213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-01-012021-12-31iso4217:GBP213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-01-012020-12-31iso4217:GBPxbrli:shares213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-12-31213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-12-31213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-12-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-12-31sancus:WarrantsOutstandingMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-01-012021-12-31sancus:WarrantsOutstandingMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-12-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-12-31sancus:WarrantsOutstandingMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262021-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262019-12-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262019-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262019-12-31sancus:WarrantsOutstandingMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262019-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262019-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262019-12-31213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-01-012020-12-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-01-012020-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-01-012020-12-31sancus:WarrantsOutstandingMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-01-012020-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800S2XOO3YSEGCA262020-01-012020-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember
Straightforward.
Experienced.
Reliable.
Annual Report 2021
About us
Sancus Lending Group Limited
isanAIM listed alternative finance
provider, offering Borrowers fast,
bespoke bridging and development
finance and Co-funders arange of
asset backed fundingopportunities.
Find out more
online
www.sancus.com
Contents
Strategic report
Highlights 1
Chairman’s statement 2
Chief Executive
Officer’s review 4
Principal risks, uncertainties
andrelated internal controls 10
Social responsibility 12
Corporate governance
Board of Directors
and Executive
Management Team 14
Governance framework 16
Audit and Risk
Committee report 20
Remuneration report 23
Directors’ report 26
Consolidated financial
statements
Independent auditor’s
report to the members
of Sancus Lending
GroupLimited 29
Consolidated statement
of comprehensive income 35
Consolidated statement
of financial position 36
Consolidated statement
of changes in
shareholders’ equity 38
Consolidated statement
of cash flows 39
Notes to the
financial statements 40
Officers and
professional advisers 72
Strategic and operational highlights
>
Change of name to Sancus
Lending Group Limited,
announced on 11 May 2021,
reflecting the Group’s continued
focus on property lending in
residential development and
bridge financing;
>
Appointment of Rory Mepham as
CEO and Steve Smith as Chairman;
>
Significant investment in the
sales and credit teams at the
endof 2021 and into 2022, to
support and drive growth
overthe coming years;
>
Focus on the maintenance of
robust institutional grade credit
processes, smooth loan execution,
active loan management, data
integrity and a proactive approach
to loans that become stressed
ordistressed;
>
Geographic focus remains
unchanged, with the UK and
Ireland the key areas of growth for
the business whilst the Offshore
markets currently remain the
Group’s largest market. Core
Sancus revenue growth was 6%
inFY21, with UK revenue up 131%;
>
Impressive growth of 60% on new
facilities written; from £50m to
£80m year on year, and a strong
pipeline in the Group’s key growth
markets for FY22 and beyond;
>
Loan book at year end £142m
(2020: £171m) as a result of large
Offshore loan repayments; and
>
Positive shift in the residential
property market presents the
Group with a favourable outlook
and an opportunity to focus on
the right strategic steps to
support growth in coming years.
Financial highlights
>
Group revenue for the year was
£9.0m (2020: £10.9m) with the
reduction in Sancus Loans Limited
representing a decrease of £2m;
>
Group loss for the year was
£10.3m (2020: loss £14.5m);
>
£6.4m of operating losses relates
to expected credit losses under
IFRS9 and represents a realistic
view on delinquent or defaulted
loans, virtually all of which were
written in or prior to 2018; and
>
Increase in operating expenses
to£6.2m (FY20: £5.6m)
reflectsinvestment in sales
andcredit teams.
Since my appointment as CEO in June 2021, I have prioritised the
turnaround of the Group’s financial performance. 2021 was the
startofa transitional period for the Company. We have rebranded,
strengthened the management team, invested in technology and
expanded our presence in the UK and Ireland. We have also
undertakena thorough review of the loan book and, where
required,provisioned accordingly.
Our plan is to return the Group to profitability by growing the
Group’sloans under management while ensuring that our credit
andother processes are best in class. We will also broaden our
funderbase and improve funding terms. The business will continue
tofocus on expanding the Group’s presence in the UK and Ireland
together with rebuilding its loan book in the Offshore markets
ofJersey, Guernsey andGibraltar.
We started 2022 with a clear strategy to return the business to
profitability, and a management team committed to achieving that.
Rory Mepham
Chief Executive Officer of Sancus Lending Group Limited
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
1
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Chairman’s statement
Positioning the business
for the future
Our target markets continue to present
compelling opportunities and coupled
with the reduced appetite amongst
traditional balance sheet lenders, we are
optimistic this will increase the potential
to write high quality new business.
2021 was a busy year. The Group was
rebranded as Sancus Lending Group
Limited (from GLI Finance Limited) on
11 May 2021, the change reflecting the
Group’s continued focus on lending
for residential property development
and bridge financing purposes.
There have also been a number of
changes to our senior executive team,
with new appointments expected to
drive Group development and growth,
which are outlined more fully below.
As part of a wider review of the
business and the expansion of the credit
and recoveries teams, we carried out a
detailed review of the Group’s loan book
in June 2021, resulting in impairments of
£3m. Whilst we have seen some
improvement in the quality of the loan
book as the worst effects of the
pandemic reduced, we have made
anadditional £3.4m provision in the
second half of the year which we
believedraws a line under recent losses.
Virtually all of the provisions relate to
loans written in or before 2018.
Finally, after a five-year tenure our
auditor, Deloitte LLP stood down
andhave been replaced by Moore
Stephens following a tender process.
I was delighted to take on the
roleof Chairman of the Group
on31August 2021, having joined
Sancus in May 2021, and am looking
forward to the challenge ahead.
Steve Smith
Chairman
A number of key events took place prior to my appointment.
Thesuccessful fund raise at the end of 2020 was the first
stepinwhat the Board believes will be a structured change
programmewhich will reposition the Group for growth.
2 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Our people
There were a number of personnel
changes during 2021. Following the
resignation of Andy Whelan, Rory
Mepham assumed the role of Interim
CEO on 30 June 2021 and was then
confirmed as CEO on 23 November
2021. Rory joined the business in
January 2021 with initial responsibility
for funding and origination and has
extensive experience in corporate
finance, capital raising, debt finance,
fund management and development.
During his transition, Rory was
supported by Dan Walker who
originally joined the Group in 2018,
and was appointed as Deputy CEO
inJune 2021. Dan subsequently left
the Group on 31 January 2022, and
wethank him for his contribution.
On8March 2022 James Waghorn
wasappointed as Chief Investment
Officer and together with Rory and
Emma Stubbs, our Chief Financial
Officer, completes our Executive
Management Team. James has over
14years’ experience in the UK and
European real estate market and has
extensive experience across the
corporate real estate, investment
andproperty development sectors.
On 31 August 2021, Patrick Firth
stepped down after sixteen years
withthe Group and I would like to
thank Patrick for his invaluable
contribution during this time.
As Rory sets out in more detail in his
report, the Group has invested in
rebuilding and reinforcing the team
and our headcount has increased from
25 at the end of 2021 to 36 at the date
of this report. The new resource will
largely be focussed on expansion in
our growth markets UK and Ireland
but will also reinforce our credit and
management focus as we deliver new
business in the coming years.
Dividend and Shareholders
As part of its wider strategic review of
the business, the Board has decided to
withdraw its previous dividend policy as
the business plan requires the
reinvestment of surplus resources in
order to deliver the planned growth
objectives. The Company last declared
a dividend in 2016 and thereafter
adopted a policy consistent with
prudent capital and liquidity
management, recognising the need
toprovide the time and funding
necessary for the various platforms in
which the Group was invested to reach
their potential. This followed the
transitioning of the business from an
investment company to a trading
company, when historically it was
earning positive cashflows from CLO
investments which enabled the business
to pay dividends. The Board’s decision
to formally withdraw its previous
dividend policy is therefore consistent
with the approach that has been
adopted over recent years, to reinvest
surplus resources for growth. As such,
the Group does not intend to declare a
dividend for the year. The Board intends
to revisit this policy at the appropriate
time, should the profitability and cash
flow profile of the business support the
reinstatement of a dividend.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to
thank shareholders for their continuing
support and patience. We certainly do
not underestimate the scale and
challenge ahead, but with the
continuing support of shareholders
and all of our stakeholders and in the
belief that we have the strategy, the
systems and the personnel to put the
business onto a firmer footing, I look
forward to reporting more positive
developments in the coming period.
Steve Smith
Chairman
30 March 2022
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
3
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Chief Executive Officer’s review
Building a stronger business
A return to Group profitability relies on successfully growing loans
under management whilst widening its range of funders, improving
funding terms and adopting institutional grade processes in all areas.
The business is focused on expanding
the Group’s presence in the UK and
Ireland, together with rebuilding its
loans under management in the
Offshore markets of Jersey, Guernsey
and Gibraltar.
The business has written in excess of
£1.2billion of loans since inception and
as at 31 December 2021 the Group loan
book stood at £142m. Sancus is targeting
significant growth of loans under
management over the coming years.
Assembling the team, having the right
structure, effective institutional
management systems and becoming
increasingly technology enabled is
necessary to achieve increased scale.
The investment in these areas is
underway and will continue in 2022.
The perennial imbalance between
supply and demand for housing
continues to offer a favourable
landscape for the Group’s anticipated
growth in its target markets. Banks
having retrenched from both SME and
development financing further provides
attractive opportunities for alternative
lenders. We continue to track the
geopolitical situation closely and note
the potential for further supply chain
disruption and inflationary risks in the
construction sector.
The successful delivery of Sancus’s
growth objectives will be driven by the
four key pillars of the Group’s business:
Origination, Loan Management, Funding
and Finance & Operations.
Origination
Originating sufficient lending volumes
across the target jurisdictions and
product types will provide the
business with the scale and
diversification it needs to deliver
sustainable profitable growth.
Significant investment has been made
in recruiting experienced business
development team members in each
of our markets during 2021, an
initiative which will continue in 2022.
In the 15 months to March 2022, we
took the total business development
heads from 8.5 to 15, with a particular
focus on our sales activity in the UK
with business development heads in
this region going from 2 to 8 over the
last 15 months. The new team
members come from experienced
backgrounds in the industry and bring
with them a large pool of potential
sources of new business. Team
members will be incentivised to deliver
quality new business with a focus on
the business earning an appropriate
return for where a given loan sits on
the risk / return spectrum.
Since my appointment as CEO
inJune 2021, I have prioritised
planning the turnaround of the
Group’s financial performance.
Rory Mepham
CEO
4 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Business Development Heads
1.5
1
3
1.5
Gibraltar
Guernsey
Jersey
2
2
Dublin
4
0
UK (North)
3
2
UK (South)
2021
2020
Whilst it is possible that further
hiringwillbe required in the future,
weconsider that this recruitment
driveprovides the team that can
substantially deliver against the
Group’s required targets. TheBoard
will remain alert to market dynamics
and future opportunities as they
present themselves and will look
toadd to the team in line with
business requirements.
As part of the risk management process,
no members of the credit committee
have an origination function. This ensures
an appropriate separation between the
origination and credit functions.
We have seen growth in new loan
facilities written during the year with
£80m written during FY21 against
£50m for FY20. Loan deployments
sawa 10% increase from £69m at
theend of 2020 to £76m for 2022.
Wehave a strong pipeline for 2022.
Arrangement fees and commitments
fees are received on the full value of
loan facility written and therefore a key
metric in monitoring the performance
of our sales team. We continue to see
significant demand for development
finance and are increasing our presence
in the bridging market with acouple of
key hires.
We envisage origination growth in the
UK and Ireland in 2022 and the years
beyond and is a key area of investment
for the Group. We further anticipate
that the Offshore business (including
the Channel Islands and Gibraltar) will
continue to offer lending opportunities
and we are confident that our
businesses in those jurisdictions are
well placed to execute against those
opportunities as they arise.
During the year, we have placed a
greater emphasis on diversifying and
growing our origination channels to
include a wider variety of brokers,
other introducers, and a greater range
of marketing tools utilised in a targeted
fashion. We have also established a
working group to explore the extent to
which technology may be able to
support our growth in origination.
New facilities written £m
0
47
Dec 2020Dec 2021
16
20
14
20
47
13
·
Offshore
·
UK
·
Ireland
Loan Deployments £m
0
48
Dec 2020Dec 2021
48
11
10
41
22
13
·
Offshore
·
UK
·
Ireland
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
5
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Loan management
Scaling the business successfully
necessitates a focus on the maintenance
of robust institutional grade credit
processes, smooth loan execution,
active loan management, data integrity
and a proactive approach to loans that
become stressed or distressed.
Loans Under Management £m
>
0
147
Dec 2020Dec 2021
147
15
9
96
29
17
·
Offshore
·
UK
·
Ireland
Maintaining a high-quality credit
process whilst scaling the quantity of
new loans is a priority. During 2021
our experienced credit team has been
supplemented by new members with
a track record in the property sector
and qualifications as Chartered
Surveyors. We have standardised our
approach across all jurisdictions
including valuation, legal title,
borrower, market due diligence and
monitoring surveyor standards.
>
Standardisation of the loan
execution process has been
implemented across the Group,
including documentation, conditions
precedent, conditions subsequent
and closing checklists. We have also
implemented a new workflow
process to expedite the time
between the loan credit approval
and loan drawdown and exploring
how we can better utilise technology
to better manage certain elements.
The business is both actively
engaging with external suppliers of
software packages together with
continuing to invest our own loan
management system. The required
investment in terms of possible
subscription charges and additional
technology staff has been budgeted
in our forecasts.
>
Greater emphasis has been placed
on actively managing loans once
the initial drawdown has been
made. This has been particularly
important during a time when
various market related pressures
such as cost inflation, are impacting
our borrowers. Active management
is helping us to deal with issues
before they become problems.
>
Where loans unavoidably become
delinquent or defaulted Sancus is
adopting a proactive approach to
minimise the risk of loss. The period
of time during which loans become
stressed can lead to further strain
on loan covenants, so decisive
action is often required without
compromising on the integrity of
decision making.
>
Due consideration is always
afforded to the interests of all
stakeholders in a given loan.
>
Further investment has been made
in recruiting experienced loan
management team members in
each of our markets during 2021,
and this will continue in 2022.
The Sancus asset backed lending loan
book decreased by 17% since the end
of 2020 from £171m to £142m. This
decrease was driven by some large
Offshore loan repayments in the
period and the knock-on effect of
Covid-19 on loan closures, and masks
promising improvements in the UK
and Irish business, where we saw
newfacilities written in these two
businesses combined of £60m in 2021,
a 76% increase from £34m in 2020.
We have a strong pipeline and expect
to see an increase in the loan book by
the end of 2022. At the year end, the
asset backed loan book comprised
Offshore at £96m (Dec 2021: £147m)
UK at £29m (Dec 2021: £15m) and
Ireland at £17m (Dec 2021: £9m).
Under the leadership of the Senior
Management Team, a detailed
evaluation of the Group’s loan book has
been completed. Particular focus has
been on reviewing historic loans that are
either delinquent or defaulted. As a
result of this exercise, the Group is
reporting an increase in expected credit
loss provisions of £6.4m for the financial
year (FY20: £4.7m). Virtually all of the
provisions made relate to legacy loans
written in 2018 or before. For all of these
positions, the new senior management
team have put together deliverable
workout strategies, and these are now
underway. These strategies have been
shared in a transparent manner with our
funding sources and feedback has been
incorporated into our plans. The
seasoned property professionals within
the new Sancus team have proven track
records in the Groups markets and will
continue to be involved in working hard
to recover value for all participants in
these positions.
Funding
We continue to focus on growing the
funding capacity of the business on
improved terms. Additionally, we are
seeking to work with a diversified mix of
funders, both private and institutional, to
match funders with the loans meeting
their varied risk and rewards criteria.
Currently, the Group continues to be
supported by four sources of funding:
>
Co-Funders
>
Loan Note program
>
Institutional funders
>
Proprietary Capital
Co-Funders remain our largest funding
channel, with the majority of the loan
book in the Channel Islands and Gibraltar
being co-funded, though its share
reduced in the year from 64% of the total
to 50% as a result of large loan
repayments. We continue to nurture
relationships with the Co-Funder base,
typically being Offshore private
individuals and family offices. In addition
to the large pool of Co-Funders that
have been working with Sancus for a
number of years, the business is actively
seeking to widen its net and has
recruited team members in its Offshore
team to be exclusively focused on
targeting and building relationships
withpotential new Co-Funders.
Chief Executive Officer’s review continued
6 Sancus Annual Report 2021
During the year we have continued
tolaunch further loan notes through
Amberton Asset Management with the
successful launch of Loan Note 7, raising
£16.7 million. Loan Note 7 matures on
10May 2024 and has a coupon of 7%
p.a. (payable quarterly), with Sancus
providing a 10% first loss guarantee.
On31 January 2022 Sancus Loan Note 8
launched with £2.0m of assets and a
target of £20 million. Loan Note 8 has
aterm of five years and a coupon of 5%
p.a. (payable quarterly), with Sancus
providing a 20% first loss guarantee.
Asthe business matures it is planned
toincrease the regularity and widen
thevariety of Loan Note products.
Sancus has a secured institutional
funding line from the Honeycomb
Investment Trust (“HIT”), which is
managed by Pollen Street Capital and is
designed to be complementary to our
Co-Funder base and Loan Notes. As
announced on 4 December 2020 the
HIT credit facility was increased to £75m
from £45m and the term was extended
to 28 January 2024. At 31 December
2021 the total drawn was £49.9m
(31December 2020: £45.0m). The HIT
facility continues to be strategic for the
business and is generally utilized in
relation to funding development loans.
Sancus has additionally secured
aforward flow bridge funding
arrangement with a global private
equity backed debt acquisition
business and continues to explore
additional long term financing lines
that could sit alongside our
syndicatedlending approach.
The availability, cost and flexibility of
funding is key to achieving our growth
ambitions and we are reviewing the
capital position of the business with a
view to ensuring it is best placed to
grow funding capacity on improved
terms. Over the course of 2021 the loan
book funded by institutional funding
increased by 22% with the majority of
the UK and Irish loan book funded by
this channel. We will seek to increase
this along with the loan notes over time.
Own capital has fluctuated around
£7m/£8m over the course of the year
inline with our strategy to increase our
Return on Tangible Assets (“ROTA”).
Finance & Operations
A focus on operational efficiencies
within Finance and Operations to be
driven by technology wherever
possible is underway, linking into the
technology strategy noted above.
Continued focus and improvement on
Corporate Governance, Compliance
and Risk via way of policy and
procedures to ensure the business
iswell set for future growth plans.
Effective compliance and corporate
governance remains a priority for the
Board. This is critical to ensuring that
only well-considered risks are taken, and
expected returns emerge as planned.
Sancus has developed, and continues
to evolve, its own proprietary loan
managements system (“LMS”) for
theadministration of loans. A
comprehensive review of the LMS
system and our wider Technology
strategy has been carried out during
the year and further steps will be
undertaken in 2022.
As highlighted above, we have made
anumber of recent hires across the
business, in particular to bolster our
Funding and Origination capabilities in
the markets in which we are active. At
the end of December 2021, the Group
headcount was 35 (31 December 2020:
25) with the largest increase in the Sales
and Credit teams and as we build our
presence across the UK and Ireland, we
expect this to increase over time.
A key milestone at the end of 2020
was the successful new equity raise as
well as restructuring our debt (Bonds
and ZDPs) and increasing and
extending the term of our facility with
HIT. This transaction had the full
support of our largest shareholder
Somerston Group who participated in
both the equity raise and new bond
issue. With the ZDP’s intended to play
a long-term part the Group’s finance
strategy, given the current maturity
date of 5 December 2022, we intend
to engage with the ZDP holders in due
course in order to seek their support
at this critical time in the Group’s
turnaround and as it embarks on a
redefined growth strategy.
Realising value from the legacy
FinTech Ventures Investments remains
a target for the management team.
Monitoring and governance of FinTech
Ventures is ongoing and we continue
to assist our investee platforms with
their strategy. Unfortunately, the
profitability of many of these
companies have failed to meet
expectations within an acceptable
timeframe and their ability to raise
additional capital without proving
concept is severely constrained. It
remains a challenging market for
manyof the FinTech platforms.
Loan Book Funding Allocation £m
Dec 2020Dec 2021
8
15
71
48
7
16
108
39
·
Own Capital
·
Co-Funders
·
Loan Notes
·
Institutional
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
7
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Strategic KPIs
The Board have agreed the following
KPI’s with the senior management
team. These have been selected based
on their link to the successful delivery
of our strategy and the executive
management team will be monitored
against these throughout the year.
Thecomposition of KPI’s are further
monitored by the Board on a regular
basis and upon their successful
delivery are designed to create
shareholder value.
>
Revenue growth.
>
Growing loans under management.
>
Reducing cost of funding.
>
Become a capital efficient business.
>
Increasing operating profits –
byincreasing gross margin and
reducing costs.
>
Return on Equity.
>
Ensuring a risk based approach
istaken on all decision making.
Summary of Financial Performance
Our full year 2021 financial results
havebeen overshadowed by the
ongoing impact of Covid-19 as we
sawa reduction in our loan book and
revenue as delays to loan completions
impacted the results. This resulted in
revenue of £9.0m for the year
compared to £10.9m last year.
2021 was the start of what we expect
will be a transitional period for the
Group, where we saw the Group
rebrand, a number of changes to
senior management and continued
expansion of our presence in the UK
and Ireland. From the delays we saw
over the last few years on development
sites and following a full review of our
loan books, we have seen an increase
in IFRS 9 provisions in the year of
£6.4m. Coupled with an increase in
operating costs as we have started
tobuild out the team for our growth
plans, this has resulted in an overall
loss for the year of £10.3m for the
year(2020: loss of £14.5m).
Although headline revenue showed a
decrease, Note 3 Segmental Reporting
sets out the results by Offshore, UK
and Ireland and we can start to see
revenue growth in our growth target
markets, with the UK revenue up by
132% over the course of 2021.
Ireland results are relatively flat
(revenue up 6%) against last year
however strict Covid-19 restrictions
inIreland during 2021 did cause some
delays to loan closures. However, we
have seen a good start to 2022 and
with most restrictions now largely
lifted and further resources allocated
to Ireland we expect 2022 to show a
good growth story.
We have seen Offshore revenue
decrease by 12% in the year, partly due
to some large exit fees which were
received in 2020 but also a reduction
in administration fees as we saw the
loan book in this region decrease over
the last few years. The Offshore team
has been rebuilt over the course of
2021 and into 2022 following some
changes in senior management and
they are focussed on building the loan
book over the next few years.
Operating costs in the year were
£6.2m (2020: £5.6m) with a breakdown
shown in Note 7. The increase we have
seen this year is largely around
employment costs where we have
started to build out the UK and Irish
operations as well as building up the
credit team in particular. We have also
been through a period of change in
senior management during the year
which has contributed to the increase
in these costs.
Following a thorough review of the
loan book we have seen an increase
inthe expected credit loss provisions
(IFRS 9) of £6.4m in the year (2020:
£4.7m). This brings the total loan and
debtor provision balance to £13.5m.
The majority of this provision figure
relates to loans written in or before
2018. As disclosed in Note 22 the total
loan and debtor provision balance is
£13.5m at 31 December 2021 (2020:
£7.9m). On a total loan and debtor
exposure including first loss positions
within HIT and the loan notes this
represents 15.7% (2020: 7.0%).
The Group’s net assets have
reducedin the year from £29.5m
at31December 2020 to £19.1m as
aresult of the operating loss in the
year which includes an increase in
theexpected credit loss provision
of£6.4m.
Goodwill remains at £22.9m, which
relates to the carrying amount of
goodwill arising on the acquisition of
Sancus Jersey and Sancus Gibraltar.
This is assessed by the Board for
impairment on an annual basis or
sooner if there has been any indication
of impairment. A full impairment review
of the carrying amount of goodwill was
reported in the June 2021 interim
accounts. The resultant value in use
calculation indicated that no impairment
of goodwill was required in either
Sancus Jersey or Sancus Gibraltar.
Following on from this review the Board
have considered whether there have
been any further indicative events of
impairment since June 2021, and they
have concluded there have not. The
next full impairment review will take
place in the 2022 Interim Report.
Group cash remains healthy. Within the
£12.4m of cash and cash equivalents
balance at 31 December 2021, £4.9m
relates to Group operational cash with
£7.5m within Sancus Loans Limited.
On balance sheet loans (excluding
those loans in Sancus Loans Limited)
were £11.6m before IFRS 9 provisions
at 31 December 2021 compared to
£11.8m at 31 December 2020. During
the year a provision of £6.4m has been
made against loans and loan debtors.
Sancus Loans Limited had loans of
£49.9m at 31 December 2021
(31December 2021: £45.0m).
The Group’s liabilities consist of the
Bond of £12.5m which has a quarterly
coupon of 7% p.a. and matures on 31
December 2025; and ZDPs of £10.6m
with a coupon of 8% and payable on 5
December 2022. The HIT credit facility
was increased to £75m from £45m on
4 December 2020 and at 31 December
2021 was £49.9m (£52.5m including
IOM loans) ((31 December 2020:
£45.0m (£45.6m including IOM loans)).
The Directors are considering their
options regarding the ZDPs inline with
the growth strategy of the business as
noted above.
Chief Executive Officer’s review continued
8 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Going Concern
The Directors have considered the going
concern basis in the preparation of the
financial statements as supported by the
Director’s assessment of the Company’s
and Group’s ability to pay its debts as
they fall due and have assessed the
current position and the principal risks
facing the business with a view to
assessing the prospects of the Company.
Liabilities which fall due in the next
12months include the final capital
entitlement of the Company’s ZDP
shares, which are repayable on
5December 2022 at £11.3m.
As part of the Group’s growth plan
theCompany is considering its options
regarding this liability which may
include re-financing, part repayment
and/or extension of the ZDPs and an
equity raise. This will require consultation
with the relevant stakeholders, including
ordinary shareholders and ZDP
shareholders and regulatory approvals
and consents. Accordingly, there can
be no certainty that the proposals will
proceed. These factors and assumptions
constitute a material uncertainty that
may cast significant doubt over the
Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern, such that it may be
unable to realise its assets and
discharge its liabilities in the normal
course of business. The Directors
expect that if they are able to action
the mitigations in accordance with the
plan outlined above, the material
uncertainty will be extinguished. The
Directors are therefore of the opinion
that the Company will have adequate
financial resources to continue in
operation and meet its liabilities as
they fall due for the foreseeable future
and continue to adopt the going
concern basis in preparing the
financial statements.
Outlook
The Group has been through a
substantial period of change with a new
chief executive and other new members
of the senior executive team now in
place. This new senior executive team
have a clearly defined strategy to return
the business to profitability. The road
map to achieving this goal has been
clearly communicated to the whole
team and all members of the Sancus
team are clear on the vision for the
business together with understanding
the role that they have to play in
delivering this target. While a great deal
of hard work lies ahead, I am certain the
team are up to the challenge and are
excited about the future.
I want to thank all shareholders for
their support during this period of
change and over the preceding year.
We are enthusiastic about the
opportunities that lie ahead of us and
look forward to delivering profitability.
Rory Mepham
Chief Executive Officer
30 March 2022
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
9
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Principal risks, uncertainties and related internal controls
The principal risks which the Group
has consciously accepted in the
pursuit of value creation are liquidity
risk, regulatory and compliance risk,
market risk, credit risk, strategic risk,
and investment risk. With regard to
the FinTech activities, exposure to
investment risk is a factor of the
strategic, liquidity, credit and operational
risks assumed by the platforms in
which the Group is invested.
This section on the Group’s Principal
Risks should be read together with the
sections on the Group’s Governance
Framework, the operation of the Audit
and Risk Committee, as well as Note 22
which describes the sensitivity of the
Group’s financial results to its Financial
Risk exposures. These sections explain
how these risks are being managed,
monitored and governed.
The table below describes the Group’s
assessment of the principal risks being
those which have the potential to have
a significant impact on the Group’s
business model, future performance,
solvency or liquidity.
Principal risks Internal controls mitigating risks Current rating of risks
Group
1. Capital and liquidity risk
Sancus’s own funding is sourced primarily
from the ZDP shares and theCorporate
Bond (as detailed in Note 17).
Expansion of lending and investment
activities will be constrained to the extent
of retained profits unless further sources
of funding are secured.
Sancus has a Treasury Committee which
meets once a month to manage its capital
andliquidity position, and forecasts over
several years to predict longer term
fundingrequirements.
Management of each of the operating
companies balance their lending and funding
and proposals to advance lending are typically
contingent on sufficient funding having been
secured in advance.
The business seeks to maintain a material
liquidity buffer at all times.
Medium
Completion of the fundraising and liability
management exercise in December 2021 has
significantly improved the Group’s capital
and liquidity position.
Management at Group and subsidiary level
are focussed on raising additional on and off
balance sheet funding in order to grow
lending activities and support funding
commitments.
2. Regulatory and Compliance Risk
As a Financial Services business,
compliance with regulation is considered
paramount within the Group, particularly
with regard to Anti Money Laundering
(AML) regulations which are critically
important.
The Company has chosen to comply
withthe provisions of the QCA Corporate
Governance Code. Refer to page 16
forfurther detail.
All entities have developed and implemented
appropriate policies and procedures relating
to regulatory compliance and Anti Money
Laundering.
The Group Compliance Committee monitors
these risks, and forthcoming regulations, with
appropriate reporting from the various Heads
of Compliance and Money Laundering
Reporting Officers. Further reviews of AML
compliance are carried out by independent
third parties where appropriate.
The Company has an appointed NOMAD,
Liberum, with whom it liaises regularly, to
ensure compliance with the AIM rules,
including the Market Abuse Regulations.
Boards receive quarterly reports from
Compliance Officers and where appropriate,
Money Laundering Reporting Officers on
compliance monitoring plans and any
breaches identified.
Low
The compliance framework as described
isconsidered to be operating effectively.
The Group is mindful of the conflicts in
Russiaand Ukraine and have carried out
acheck of our clients against various
sanctionlists in relation to Russia and
havenot identified any individual or entity
ofany concern. Additionally, we subscribe
toWorldCheck for standard AML checking
purposes with all clients set up for ongoing
monitoring, which provides any real-time
negative information, that include
updatedsanctions.
The Group aims to carefully manage the risks which are inherent
across its business activities in order to deliver an appropriate
riskadjusted commercial return.
Risk management is key
to achieving objectives
10 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Principal risks Internal controls mitigating risks Current rating of risks
Group
3. Market risk
The primary market risks are considered
to be interest rate and foreign exchange
risk. Given the nature of the business
operations, with relatively short term
lending and currencies on lending
opportunities being matched (or hedged)
the exposure is considered to have limited
impact on its position as a Going Concern.
Foreign exchange risk primarily arises
from the USD and Euro investments in
the FinTech portfolio and Euro loans held
in the Irish lending book.
Exposures to these risks are monitored regularly
by the Sancus Treasury Committee and reported
to the Board on a quarterly basis.
These risks are identified and assessed at the
time of entering into new transactions.
Low
More information on the sensitivity to these
risks is contained in Note 22.
Covid-19 could cause interest rate and foreign
exchange fluctuations although the impact of
this we believe is likely to be minimal as loans
have fixed rates and are short term. Co-
Funders might look elsewhere to investment;
however, we believe this to be a minimal risk as
our lending model enables investors to receive
attractive risk adjusted returns on asset
backed lending.
4. Credit Risk
The Group has direct credit exposures
through its on balance sheet lending and
credit support. Indirect credit risk
(potential losses to Co-Funders) could
impact further business development.
Each operational entity has its own credit
policies and procedures which are the
subjectof at least annual review by
operatingentity Boards.
The respective Credit Committees take all
credit decisions, monitor credit exposures
onan ongoing basis and manage recoveries
situations. Following Covid-19 tighter lending
criteria has been implemented.
Medium
The IFRS 9 provision increased substantially
during the year. However, the credit
performance across the Group remains
resilient with actual losses incurred being
less than 1% of loans advanced.
See Note 22(5) for further details.
Covid-19 created downside risk through
potential delays in loan repayments and
reduced recoveries. We believe the risk
ofthis going forward has reduced.
Sancus
5. Operational Risk – Execution of the
Sancus strategy
Approximately 80% of Sancus’s capital
has been deployed into the Sancus Group.
There is a risk that the planned growth of
these businesses will not be realised
primarily as a result of sub optimal levels
of loan origination and funding.
The Board and Executive Committee of Sancus
Group recognise the challenge of building the
business to meet the financial targets and
actively manage all aspects of the business on
an ongoing basis. Plans and budgets are in place
and performance against these is monitored
regularly by the management team and the
Executive Committee.
There continues to be strong demand from
both Borrowers and Co-Funders for the
lending products offered across the business,
and the risk adjusted returns available to
Co-Funders.
Medium
By its nature, this risk remains an on-going
area of focus for the Board, particularly with
respect to business development in the UK
and Ireland.
The emergence of Covid-19 created downside
risk on new loan origination levels although
we believe this risk has now reduced.
IT capabilities for Sancus were further
enhanced during 2021, providing Co-
Funders with online interactive services
andcreating operational efficiencies.
FinTech Ventures
6. Investment risk – platformvaluations
Across the majority of the FinTech
portfolio, the growth rates historically
have been slower than originally
anticipated and the business models have
proved more capital intensive.
Many of the FinTech platforms require
additional capital to fund their ongoing
growth to enable them to reach profitability.
There remains a risk that some platforms
may not be successful in the longer term,
either as a result of lack of loan funding, lack
of working capital funding or difficulties in
establishing a competitive position in their
chosen markets.
The Group has board seats or board observer
rights on most investee company boards and thus
is able to participate in the strategic discussions
and monitor the progress on each platform.
The Group regularly monitors the progress of
each business, with regular review of financial
and KPI reporting.
Period end valuations are conducted for all
investments in platforms. These are based on
avariety of factors including the pricing for
anyrecent relevant capital transactions by the
respective platform or using an appropriate
valuation methodology such as a discounted
cash flow model. The forecasts provided by
management of the platforms are often
challenged, and where considered appropriate,
adjustments are made and sensitivity analysis
is included as part of the valuation work.
Low
As a result of the platforms taking longer to
reach profitability, and given that several are
seeking additional capital, the Board has
valued our holding of the FinTech portfolio
at £0.5m at the end of 2021.
The valuations are also subject to a number
of material estimation uncertainties, refer to
Note 22(4).
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
11
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Social responsibility
Our ESG journey at Sancus
We recognise our responsibility to
incorporate sustainability throughout
the operations of our business, be
custodians of the environment and
practice good stewardship of our
stakeholders’ interests. We are now
taking steps to improve our approach
to managing these factors.
Q1 2022 has been focused on starting
to define our ESG strategy. Having
now established an internal ESG focus
group we will also draw on external
industry experts as required.
It is essential that we understand what
ESG factors are most important to our
stakeholders, such that we can focus
our strategy around improving our
approach to these material issues.
Weare well on our way to completing
a materiality assessment and intend
toengage with stakeholders in the
coming period.
Our approach to ESG will be to
breakdown the topics into People,
Planet and Prosperity. Starting by
ascertaining which factors are material
to our business, establish our baseline,
set objectives & goals, assess the gap
between goals and baseline, establish
a roadmap, set KPIs and report on
progress (see infographic opposite).
We are committed to providing an
ESG report, focusing on our progress
in the 2022 Annual Report.
At Sancus, we are committed to taking environmental,
socialandgovernance (“ESG”) factors seriously.
12 Sancus Annual Report 2021
1.
Materiality
assessment
2.
Current state
(baseline)
3.
Objectives
and goals
4.
Future
stategap
5.
Strategic
roadmap
Our approach
to ESG
7.
Report
progress
6.
KPIs
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
13
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Board of Directors and Executive Management Team
Strong leadership
and governance
B B B B
E
B
E
E
Steve Smith
Independent Non-Executive Director
John Whittle
Independent Non-Executive Director
Tracy Clarke
Non-Executive Director
Rory Mepham
Executive Director, CEO
Emma Stubbs
Executive Director, CFO
James Waghorn*
Chief Investment Officer
Mr Smith was formerly an Executive
Director and the Chief Investment
Officer of The British Land Company
plc, the FTSE 100 real estate
investment trust, with responsibility
for the group’s property and
investment strategy, standing down in
2013. Prior to this, Mr Smith was Global
Head of Asset Management and
Transactions at AXA Real Estate
Investment Managers, where he was
responsible for the asset management
of a portfolio of assets valued at more
than €40 billion on behalf of life funds,
listed property vehicles, unit linked
and closed end funds. Prior to joining
AXA in 1999, Mr Smith was Managing
Director at Sun Life Properties for over
five years. Over the last decade, Mr
Smith has worked extensively in
governance related roles for a number
of real estate focused organisations.
Mr Smith is Chairman of the Board and
is a member of the Audit and Risk
Committee and Remuneration and
Nomination Committee. Mr Smith was
appointed to the Board on 11 May 2021.
He is resident in the UK.
Mr Whittle has a background in large
third party Fund Administration. He has
worked extensively in high tech service
industries and has in-depth experience
of strategic development and mergers/
acquisitions. He has experience of listed
company boards as well as the private
equity, property and fund of funds
sectors. He is currently a director of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance
Limited and TRIG (both listed on the
main market of the London Stock
Exchange) and Chenavari Toro Income
Fund Limited (admitted to trading on the
Specialist Fund Segment of the London
Stock Exchange). Mr Whittle, a
Chartered Accountant, has also served
as Finance Director of Close Fund
Services Limited (responsible for internal
finance and client financial reporting),
Managing Director of Hugh Symons
Group PLC and Finance Director and
Deputy MD of Talkland International
Limited (now Vodafone Retail).
Mr Whittle was appointed to the
Board, the Audit and Risk Committee
and the Remuneration and Nomination
Committee on 23 September 2016,
after having served as an Alternate
Director since December 2015. He is
resident in Guernsey. Mr Whittle is
Chairman of the Audit and Risk
Committee, and of the Remuneration
and Nomination Committee.
Ms Clarke is a representative of the
Somerston group of companies
(“Somerston”), the Company’s
largestshareholder which has the
right to nominate one individual for
appointment to the Board. Ms Clarke
joined Somerston in 2016 and acts as
the group’s Chief Operating Officer.
Ms Clarke is also Managing Director
ofCarlton Management Services
Limited, a licensed Jersey trust
company business. Prior to joining
Somerston, Ms Clarke worked for
Deutsche Bank in Jersey and Zurich
for over 10 years, specialising in
financial Intermediary and external
asset manager business. Ms Clarke is
aFellow of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales
and holds the CISI Investment Advice
Diploma. Ms Clarke was appointed to
the Board on 8 March 2022 and is a
member of the Company’s Audit and
Risk Committee and Remuneration
and Nomination Committee.
Rory joined Sancus in January 2021,
assuming the role of Interim CEO on
1July 2021 and was then confirmed
asCEO and board member on
23November 2021. Joining Sancus
from The Somerston Group where he
managed their European real estate
platform which includes business in
the hotel, retail, land development,
student housing and PRS sectors.
Rory has over 20 years experience
inthe UK and European property
market. He has spent his career
working with institutional capital and
has an extensive track record in M&A,
corporate finance, capital raising, debt
finance, investment management and
property development. Rory Holds an
MBA from the Cranfield School of
Management, a BSc(Hons) in Land
Management from the University of
Reading and qualified as a member
ofthe Royal Institute of Chartered
Surveyors (MRICS).
Emma joined the Group in
November2013 as Chief Financial
Officer and was appointed to the
Board on 16 September 2014. Emma
isalso a Board member of Sancus
Group Holdings Limited and a number
of the subsidiary entities. Emma
wasappointed as a Non Executive
Director on Funding Options Limited
on 24March 2020. Emma is also a
Non-Executive Director of Amberton
Limited. Emma is a Fellow member of
the Association of Chartered Certified
Accountants and qualified with Deloitte
in 2004. She graduated from the
University of the West of England with
a BA Hons degree in Accounting and
Finance. Emma is resident in Guernsey.
James was appointed to the Executive
Management Team on 8 March 2022.
James has over 14 years experience
inthe UK and European real estate
market. James has extensive
experience across the corporate real
estate, investment and property
development sectors. For the past
6years James’ has led Somerston’s
land development business, a strategic
land and development focused
business with capacity for in excess
of2,350 units within its strategic
portfolio. James holds a BSc in
Investment and Finance in Property
from the University of Reading and
isMRICS accredited. James joined
Sancus in January 2021.
* Joined Executive Management Team
on 8March 2022)
The Board recognises the importance
ofastrong corporate governance culture.
The composition of the Board is the
subject of ongoing review. Somerston
Group had the right to nominate a
candidate for appointment to the Board
and took up this right in 2019 with the
appointment of Nick Wakefield. On the
8 March 2022 it was announced that
Nick Wakefield has been replaced by
Tracy Clarke (bio noted below).
14 Sancus Annual Report 2021
B B B B
E
B
E
E
Steve Smith
Independent Non-Executive Director
John Whittle
Independent Non-Executive Director
Tracy Clarke
Non-Executive Director
Rory Mepham
Executive Director, CEO
Emma Stubbs
Executive Director, CFO
James Waghorn*
Chief Investment Officer
Mr Smith was formerly an Executive
Director and the Chief Investment
Officer of The British Land Company
plc, the FTSE 100 real estate
investment trust, with responsibility
for the group’s property and
investment strategy, standing down in
2013. Prior to this, Mr Smith was Global
Head of Asset Management and
Transactions at AXA Real Estate
Investment Managers, where he was
responsible for the asset management
of a portfolio of assets valued at more
than €40 billion on behalf of life funds,
listed property vehicles, unit linked
and closed end funds. Prior to joining
AXA in 1999, Mr Smith was Managing
Director at Sun Life Properties for over
five years. Over the last decade, Mr
Smith has worked extensively in
governance related roles for a number
of real estate focused organisations.
Mr Smith is Chairman of the Board and
is a member of the Audit and Risk
Committee and Remuneration and
Nomination Committee. Mr Smith was
appointed to the Board on 11 May 2021.
He is resident in the UK.
Mr Whittle has a background in large
third party Fund Administration. He has
worked extensively in high tech service
industries and has in-depth experience
of strategic development and mergers/
acquisitions. He has experience of listed
company boards as well as the private
equity, property and fund of funds
sectors. He is currently a director of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance
Limited and TRIG (both listed on the
main market of the London Stock
Exchange) and Chenavari Toro Income
Fund Limited (admitted to trading on the
Specialist Fund Segment of the London
Stock Exchange). Mr Whittle, a
Chartered Accountant, has also served
as Finance Director of Close Fund
Services Limited (responsible for internal
finance and client financial reporting),
Managing Director of Hugh Symons
Group PLC and Finance Director and
Deputy MD of Talkland International
Limited (now Vodafone Retail).
Mr Whittle was appointed to the
Board, the Audit and Risk Committee
and the Remuneration and Nomination
Committee on 23 September 2016,
after having served as an Alternate
Director since December 2015. He is
resident in Guernsey. Mr Whittle is
Chairman of the Audit and Risk
Committee, and of the Remuneration
and Nomination Committee.
Ms Clarke is a representative of the
Somerston group of companies
(“Somerston”), the Company’s
largestshareholder which has the
right to nominate one individual for
appointment to the Board. Ms Clarke
joined Somerston in 2016 and acts as
the group’s Chief Operating Officer.
Ms Clarke is also Managing Director
ofCarlton Management Services
Limited, a licensed Jersey trust
company business. Prior to joining
Somerston, Ms Clarke worked for
Deutsche Bank in Jersey and Zurich
for over 10 years, specialising in
financial Intermediary and external
asset manager business. Ms Clarke is
aFellow of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales
and holds the CISI Investment Advice
Diploma. Ms Clarke was appointed to
the Board on 8 March 2022 and is a
member of the Company’s Audit and
Risk Committee and Remuneration
and Nomination Committee.
Rory joined Sancus in January 2021,
assuming the role of Interim CEO on
1July 2021 and was then confirmed
asCEO and board member on
23November 2021. Joining Sancus
from The Somerston Group where he
managed their European real estate
platform which includes business in
the hotel, retail, land development,
student housing and PRS sectors.
Rory has over 20 years experience
inthe UK and European property
market. He has spent his career
working with institutional capital and
has an extensive track record in M&A,
corporate finance, capital raising, debt
finance, investment management and
property development. Rory Holds an
MBA from the Cranfield School of
Management, a BSc(Hons) in Land
Management from the University of
Reading and qualified as a member
ofthe Royal Institute of Chartered
Surveyors (MRICS).
Emma joined the Group in
November2013 as Chief Financial
Officer and was appointed to the
Board on 16 September 2014. Emma
isalso a Board member of Sancus
Group Holdings Limited and a number
of the subsidiary entities. Emma
wasappointed as a Non Executive
Director on Funding Options Limited
on 24March 2020. Emma is also a
Non-Executive Director of Amberton
Limited. Emma is a Fellow member of
the Association of Chartered Certified
Accountants and qualified with Deloitte
in 2004. She graduated from the
University of the West of England with
a BA Hons degree in Accounting and
Finance. Emma is resident in Guernsey.
James was appointed to the Executive
Management Team on 8 March 2022.
James has over 14 years experience
inthe UK and European real estate
market. James has extensive
experience across the corporate real
estate, investment and property
development sectors. For the past
6years James’ has led Somerston’s
land development business, a strategic
land and development focused
business with capacity for in excess
of2,350 units within its strategic
portfolio. James holds a BSc in
Investment and Finance in Property
from the University of Reading and
isMRICS accredited. James joined
Sancus in January 2021.
* Joined Executive Management Team
on 8March 2022)
B
Board of Directors
E
Executive Team
Board of Directors
The Company operates a unitary
Board Structure, comprised of both
Executive and Non-Executive
Directors. Biographical details of the
Directors can be found below. The
terms of Directors’ appointments are
available from the Company Secretary.
On joining the Board, any new director
will have received an induction
through face to face meetings with
existing directors, senior management
and the Company Secretary.
The Chairman leads the Board and is
responsible for its overall effectiveness
in directing the Company, its corporate
governance responsibilities, and
addressing any training or development
needs of the directors.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
15
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Governance framework
Committed to strengthening
corporate governance
The Board believes that scrutinising all
aspects of the Company’s business
and reflecting, analysing and
improving its procedures will minimise
the potential for downside risk and will
preserve shareholder value. In
compliance with the AIM Rules for
Companies, published March 2018, the
Company has chosen to comply with
the provisions of the QCA Corporate
Governance Code (the “QCA Code”).
The Company is also mindful of the
provisions of the Finance Sector Code
of Corporate Governance, as amended
by the Guernsey Financial Services
Commission in November 2021.
The Board believes that applying the
principles and reporting against the
provisions of the QCA Code accurately
reflects the nature, scale and
complexity of the business and
enables the Board to provide
information to shareholders on its
activities in accordance with the
principles set out in a recognised
governance framework. Furthermore,
through applying the relevant
provisions the Company is better
positioned to mitigate downside risk
and in doing so, preserve long-term
shareholder value.
The Company’s corporate governance
framework has been based on these
principles and is designed to deliver
the Group’s strategy, and the application
of such principles to the operation of
the Board ensures that its decision-
making processes remain focussed
onthe long-term sustainable success
of the Company.
The Board is committed to maintaining high standards
ofcorporategovernance throughout the Company’s
operationsand to ensuring that all of its practices are
conductedtransparently, ethically and efficiently.
16 Sancus Annual Report 2021
As at 31 December 2021, the Company
complied substantially with the
relevant provisions of the QCA Code
and it is the intention of the Board that
the Company will comply with these
provisions throughout the year ending
31 December 2022, save with regard
to the following:
>
The appointment of a Senior
Independent Director: Given the size
and composition of the Board, the
Board does not consider it is
necessary to appoint a Senior
Independent Director. The Board
considers that all the independent
Directors have different qualities and
areas of expertise on which they may
lead where issues arise and to whom
concerns can be referred.
>
Internal audit function: The Board has
considered the need for an internal
audit function and is satisfied that the
compliance policies, procedures and
reporting mechanisms in place
throughout the group are sufficient,
and that implementing a separate
internal audit function would be
unnecessary. This requirement is
assessed annually by the Audit and
Risk Committee.
How we apply the QCA Code
The Company has established specific
formally constituted committees and
implemented certain policies, to
ensure that:
>
It is led by an effective Board which
is collectively responsible for the
long-term sustainable success of
the Company and establishes a
culture whereby the tone is set from
the top which is consistent with the
objectives, strategy and business
model of the Group;
>
the Board and its committees have
the appropriate balance of skills,
experience, independence, and
knowledge of the Company to
enable them to discharge their
respective duties and
responsibilities effectively;
>
the Board establishes a formal and
transparent arrangement for
considering how it applies the
corporate reporting, risk
management, and internal control
principles and for maintaining an
appropriate relationship with the
Company’s auditors; and
>
there is a dialogue with shareholders
based on the mutual understanding
and alignment of objectives,
conducted primarily through the CEO
and the Corporate Broker.
Risk management remains a key area
of focus during Board meetings.
Details of the Company’s risk
management and internal control
framework is set out on page 10.
Composition and Independence
oftheBoard of Directors
The Board of Directors is responsible
for ensuring the affairs of the
Company are properly managed
through formulating, reviewing and
approving the Company’s strategy,
budgets, and corporate actions and
that oversight, scrutiny and challenge
is applied to Executives responsible
for the day-to-day activities of the
Group. The Company seeks to deliver
long-term growth for shareholders
and maintain a flexible, efficient and
effective management framework
within an entrepreneurial environment.
It is important that the Board itself
contains the right mix of skills and
experience in order to deliver the
strategy of the Company. As such,
theBoard is comprised of:
>
Two Independent Non-Executive
Directors, one of which serves as
the Chairman, who is responsible
for leadership of the Board and
ensuring its effectiveness on all
aspects of its role;
>
One Non-Executive Director who,
whilst sharing the fiduciary and
statutory duties of the independent
directors, is also an executive
director of the Somerston Group,
asignificant shareholder of the
Company, and therefore not
considered independent under the
QCA Code; and
>
Two Executive Directors, who are
also members of the Group’s
Executive Committee and are
therefore not considered
independent under the QCA Code.
The Board is comprised of individuals
holding professional qualifications and
experience relevant to the activities
ofthe Company. A biography of each
of the Directors is included on pages
14 and 15. The time requirement
expected from each of the Directors
isset out in writing in their respective
appointment letters.
Liberum Capital has been appointed as
the Company’s Corporate Broker and
Nominated Adviser under the AIM Rules
and advises on compliance with the AIM
Rules, corporate communications and
acts as financial adviser to corporate
actions. Additionally, the Company has
appointed a professional Company
Secretary who assists the Board of
Directors in preparing for and running
effective board meetings, including the
timely dissemination of appropriate
information. The Company Secretary
provides guidance to the extent required
by the Board on certain aspects of the
legal and regulatory environment, within
which the Company operates.
The Board believes that long serving
Directors should not be prevented from
forming part of the Board or from acting
as Chairman and no limit has been
imposed on the overall length of service
of the Directors. EachDirector will retire
and seek reappointment at every third
annual general meeting, with those
serving for nine years or more subject to
reappointment annually. The Board
meets on at least a quarterly basis during
the financial year.
The Board has appointed several
committees to support it in different
areas of the business; each with formal
terms of reference, with specific roles
as set out below.
The Board undertakes an annual
evaluation of its own performance,
theperformance of its formally
constituted committees and that of
individual Directors. This includes a
formal process of self-appraisal
reviewing the balance of skills,
experience, independence and
diversity present on the Board, and
individual director performance,
contribution and commitment to the
Group to ensure that the Board and its
committees continue to operate
effectively, or to identify areas where
action is required. The remainder of
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
17
Sancus Annual Report 2021
the Board is responsible for evaluating
the performance of the Chairman. The
Chairman also has responsibility for
assessing the individual Board members’
training requirements. No significant
findings were identified in the 2021
evaluation which required further action.
The Directors remain mindful of the
benefits which can flow from
increasing the level of diversity
represented on the Board including,
but not limited to, cultural, gender,
experience and background. Such
factors will be taken into consideration
by the Nomination Committee during
any selection process.
Executive Management Team
As at the year end, the Company’s
Executive Management Team
comprised Rory Mepham (Chief
Executive Officer), Emma Stubbs
(Chief Financial Officer) and Dan
Walker (Chief Operating Officer and
UK Managing Director) (together the
“Executive Management Team” or
“Management”). Management are
responsible for the day-to-day
management of the Company’s
operations. The non-executive
independent Directors monitor and
evaluate the performance of the
Management Team on an ongoing
basis. Dan Walker left the Company on
31 January 2022 and on 8 March 2022
James Waghorn was appointed to the
Executive Management Team as Chief
Investment Officer.
Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee
conducts formal meetings at least
twice a year. The Audit and Risk
Committee’s key duties include:
>
monitoring the integrity of the
financial statements of the Group,
including its annual and half-yearly
reports and any other formal
announcement relating to its
financial performance, reviewing,
challenging (where necessary) and
reporting to the Board on significant
financial reporting issues and
judgements which they contain
having regard to matters
communicated to it by the auditor,
and how they were addressed;
>
reviewing the Group’s internal
financial controls and the Group’s
internal control and risk
management systems;
>
making recommendations to the
Board for it to put to the
shareholders for their approval in
general meeting in relation to the
appointment, re-appointment or
removal of the external auditor and
to recommend the remuneration
and terms of engagement of the
external auditor;
>
monitoring the external auditor’s
independence and objectivity and
the effectiveness of the audit
process, taking into account
relevant professional and regulatory
requirements;
>
in conjunction with executive
management, advise the Board on
the overall risk appetite, tolerance
and strategy of the Group, current
risk exposures and future risk
strategy; and
>
keep under review the Group’s
overall risk assessment processes
that inform the Board’s decision
making, ensuring both qualitative
and quantitative metrics are used.
The Audit and Risk Committee has
three members, two of whom are
independent, non-executive directors
and one of whom is a non-executive
director, and at least one member has
recent and relevant financial experience.
The current members of the Committee
are John Whittle as the Chairman,
Steve Smith and Tracy Clarke.
The Audit and Risk Committee is
supported by a risk management and
oversight process employed by the
Executive Management Team and
receives reports twice a year on key
risks and developments during the
period, or as otherwise required in
thecase of a material development.
The terms of reference of the Audit
and Risk Committee are available
fromthe Company Secretary.
Remuneration and Nomination
Committee
The purpose of the Remuneration and
Nomination Committee is to determine
and agree with the Board the
framework or broad policy for the
remuneration of the Company’s
Directors, senior executives, and any
bonus-related arrangements in place
by the Company as well as to consider
the structure, size and composition of
the Board. The key duties of the
Remuneration and Nomination
Committee include:
>
determining and agreeing with
theBoard the framework or broad
policy for the remuneration of the
Company’s Chairman, executive and
non-executive directors and such
other members of the management
as it is designated to consider;
>
reviewing the ongoing
appropriateness and relevance
ofthe remuneration policy;
>
reviewing the structure, size and
composition of the Board;
>
considering the succession planning
for Directors and the Executive
Management Team;
>
reviewing the leadership needs
ofthe organisation; and
>
identifying candidates for
appointment to the Board.
The Remuneration and Nomination
Committee has three members, all
ofwhom are non-executive directors
and two are independent. The current
members of the committee are
JohnWhittle as the Chairman,
SteveSmith and Tracy Clarke.
The terms of reference of the
Remuneration and Nomination
Committee are available from the
Company Secretary.
Please refer to the Remuneration
Report on page 23 for details of fees
paid to the Directors during the year.
Governance framework continued
18 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Board
Quarterly Other
Remuneration &
Nomination
Committee
Audit and Risk
Committee
Total number of meetings held during the year 4 19 6 4
Stephen Smith (Chairman)
1
3 of 3 7 of 7 3 of 3 3 of 3
Patrick Firth
2
3 of 3 16 of 16 6 of 6 2 of 2
John Whittle 4 of 4 18 of 19 6 of 6 4 of 4
Nicholas Wakefield 4 of 4 18 of 19 6 of 6 4 of 4
Andrew Whelan
3
2 of 2 12 of 16 n/a n/a
Emma Stubbs 4 of 4 19 of 19 n/a n/a
Rory Mepham
4
1 of 1 1 of 1 n/a n/a
1
Stephen Smith was appointed to the Board on 11 May 2021 and appointed as Chairman of the Board on 1 September 2022.
2
Patrick Firth resigned as Chairman of the Board on 31 August 2021.
3
Andrew Whelan resigned from the Board on 30 June 2021.
4
Rory Mepham was appointed to the Board on 23 November 2021.
Meetings and attendance
The Directors meet on a quarterly
basis (‘Quarterly’ meetings per the
table below) and at other unscheduled
times (‘Other’ meetings per the
tablebelow) when necessary to
assessGroup operations and the
setting and monitoring of strategy
andperformance.
The table below, details the
attendance of the Board at eligible
Board and Committee meetings
during the year, noting that certain
Directors retired or were appointed
during the course of the year.
Relations with Stakeholders
The Board’s advisers and the Executive
Management Team maintain regular
dialogue with key shareholders, the
feedback from which is reported to the
Board and the Chairman. Shareholders
who wish to communicate with the
Board should contact the Company
Secretary in the first instance, whose
contact details can be found on page 72.
The Board also regularly monitors the
shareholder profile of the Company.
All shareholders have the opportunity
to and are encouraged to attend the
Company’s annual general meeting at
which members of the Board are
available in person to meet shareholders
and answer questions.
Whilst the primary duty of the Directors
is owed to the Company as a whole, the
Board takes into consideration the
interests of all key stakeholder groups
as part of its decision-making process
and particular consideration is given to
the impact of any decision on holders of
its securities, the Co-Funders to the
underlying loan businesses, and
providers of the Group’s long-term debt
capital. The Board also recognises the
crucial roles played by those involved
throughout the Group’s operations who
contribute to delivering strategy,
including staff and key service
providers, to ensure a continued
alignment of interests between their
activities and those of the Company.
Terms of Reference
ofCommittees
Committee Terms of Reference are
available from the Company Secretary.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
19
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Audit and Risk Committee report
Ensuring the highest business
standards and integrity
Chairman and membership
The Audit and Risk Committee
comprises of John Whittle as
Chairman, Steve Smith and Tracy
Clarke. Only Non-Executive Directors
serve on the Audit and Risk
Committee and members of the Audit
and Risk Committee have no links with
the Company’s external auditor and
are independent of the Executive
Management Team. The Audit and
Risk Committee meets not less than
three times a year in Guernsey and
meets the external auditor at least
twice a year in Guernsey. The identity
of the Chairman of the Audit and Risk
Committee is reviewed on an annual
basis and the membership of the Audit
and Risk Committee, and its terms of
reference are kept under review.
Regular attendees at the Audit and
Risk Committee include the CEO,
CFOand CIO.
Duties
The Audit and Risk Committee is
responsible for monitoring the financial
reporting process, including the
appropriateness of the Company’s
accounting policies and the effectiveness
of the Company’s risk management and
internal control systems.
The Committee continues to spend a
considerable amount of time reviewing
significant risks and areas of judgement.
In particular, the Committee conducts
detailed reviews and analysis of the
valuations prepared by the Executive
Management Team of the FinTech
Ventures investments, the Subsidiary
Goodwill value in use models to assess if
any impairment might be required and
the Expected Credit Loss model. These
valuations are key elements in the
Group’s financial statements and the
Audit and Risk Committee questions
these carefully.
External Audit
The Audit and Risk Committee is
responsible for overseeing the
relationship with the external auditor,
including the ongoing assessment of the
auditor’s independence. The Committee
makes recommendations to the Board
with regard to the appointment of the
external auditor and approves their
terms of engagement and fees. The
Committee discusses and agrees the
nature and scope of the audit as set out
in the audit engagement letter, reviews
the results of the audit as described in
the auditors’ management letter and the
ongoing independence and objectivity
of the external auditor. Following a
tender process, Moore Stephens were
appointed as the Company’s auditor in
2021, taking over from Deloitte who
held this position since 2016.
The Audit and Risk Committee has a formal terms of reference
mandate documenting the duties and responsibilities which it
hasbeen delegated by the Board. These are available from the
Company Secretary.
The Audit and Risk Committee has been in operation throughout the year under review.
During 2021, management
continued to enhance its reporting
on risk management to the Board
and the Audit and Risk Committee.
John Whittle
Chairman
Audit and Risk Committee
20 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Processes are in place to safeguard
the independence of the external
auditor, including controls around the
use of the external auditor for non-
audit services. The external auditor
also provides the Audit and Risk
Committee with further assurance as
to the procedures that it maintains to
preserve objectivity and confirmation
that it remains independent. All
non-audit services are pre-approved
by the Audit and Risk Committee.
Effectiveness of External Auditor
The Committee assessed the
effectiveness of the external auditor
and the external audit process for 2021
through a number of steps, including:
>
agreement of their engagement
letter and fees;
>
review of the external audit plan;
>
meetings with the external auditors;
>
considering the extent of any
non-audit services provided by the
external auditors;
>
considering the external auditors’
fulfilment of the agreed audit plan
and variations from it;
>
considering the report from the
auditor highlighting any major
issues that arose during the course
of the audit; and
>
conducting interviews to obtain
feedback from the Executive
Management Team to evaluate the
performance of the audit team.
For the audit for the year ended
31December 2021, the Audit and Risk
Committee was satisfied that the audit
was effective and that there were no
factors which had any bearing on the
independence or effectiveness of the
external auditor.
Financial reporting
The Audit and Risk Committee
reviews, considers and, if thought
appropriate, recommends to the
Board the approval of the contents of
the half yearly report and annual
report and audited financial statements
together with the external auditor’s
report thereon. It focuses particularly
on compliance with legal requirements,
accounting standards and the relevant
Listing Rules.
The ultimate responsibility for reviewing
and approving the half year report and
annual report and audited financial
statements remains with the Board.
The Audit and Risk Committee provides
a forum through which the external
auditor reports to the Board and the
external auditor is invited to attend
Audit and Risk Committee meetings at
which annual and half yearly financial
statements are considered. After
discussions with the Executive
Management Team and external auditor,
the Audit and Risk Committee
determined that the key risks of
misstatement of the Group’s financial
statements relate to the valuation of
financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss, the valuation and
recoverability of goodwill, loan
impairments and revenue.
Freely tradeable market prices are not
available for the majority of the Group’s
financial assets, including the carrying
value of goodwill arising on
consolidation, which are therefore
based on a discounted cash flow basis.
Goodwill impairment reviews are
carried out annually or sooner where
an indicative event of impairment has
been identified. The next annual review
will coincide with the preparation of the
2022 interim accounts, there having
been no indicative event of impairment
since the last annual review which
coincided with the preparation of the
2021 interim accounts. Full details can
be found in Note 2(h), Note 3 and
Note12 to the financial statements.
For the valuations of the FinTech
Ventures portfolio, the Executive
Management Team provides a detailed
valuation report on a quarterly basis.
The Executive Management Team has
confirmed to the Audit and Risk
Committee that the valuation
methodology has been applied
consistently during the year. The
accounting policies are described
indetail in Note 2(f) to the financial
statements.
The Audit and Risk Committee has
assessed the processes around the
expected credit loss provisions recorded
in respect of the Group’s loan assets and
reviewed the IFRS 9 model adopted at
year-end which had also gone through
the credit committee for approval.
The accounting policies for revenue
recognition are described in detail in
Note 2(o) to the financial statements.
The Audit and Risk Committee has
reviewed the revenue recognition
policies of the Group and has
determined that they are in accordance
with the accounting standards and
have been applied consistently.
After due consideration, the Audit and
Risk Committee recommends to the
Board that the Annual Report and
Financial Statements, taken as a whole,
is fair, balanced and understandable
and provides the information necessary
for shareholders to assess the Group
and Company’s performance, business
model and strategy.
Non-Audit and audit related fees
paid to the External Auditors
During 2021 no non-audit fees were paid
to Moore Stephens, the external auditors.
£15,000 was paid to Moore Stephens for
audit related services, being the half year
review. There is no perceived threat to
auditor independence given the nature
of the services provided and the
safeguards in place.
Risk Management and Internal
Control Systems
During 2021, management continued
to enhance its reporting on risk
management to the Board and the
Audit and Risk Committee, which
cover the operation of the Company
and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
TheAudit and Risk Committee has
received and considered these reports
on three occasions, which has been
the basis for its conclusion below.
In addition to the review of risk
management reports, and in
accordance with the guidance
published in the Guidance on Risk
Management, Internal Control and
Related Financial and Business
Reporting by the Financial Reporting
Council (the “FRC”), the Audit and Risk
Committee has reviewed the Company’s
internal control procedures and
concluded that these are adequate to
manage the current risk profile.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
21
Sancus Annual Report 2021
A robust, ongoing process ofRisk
Management and InternalControl
The Board and Executive Management
Team are responsible for safeguarding
the assets of the Group through
establishing effective systems of risk
management and internal control. This
responsibility is shared by the Directors
of subsidiary companies, who are
similarly responsible for safeguarding
the assets of these companies.
The Board is also responsible for
deciding on whether the nature and
extent of risks taken within the Group
are within its risk appetite. Such risks
have been formally defined (refer
page10), setting the basis for the
design and implementation of the
Group’s internal control framework.
On behalf of the Board, the Audit and
Risk Committee oversees the Group’s
risk management and internal control
systems. These systems are designed
to ensure proper accounting records
are maintained and that internal and
published financial information is
reliable, and that the assets of the
Group are safeguarded. Such a system
of internal controls can only provide
reasonable and not absolute assurance
against misstatement or loss.
Critical components of the Group’s
internal control framework include the
documented policies which describe
how each risk is to be managed and
governed and the governance
committees established in terms of
such policies, which have mandates
describing how they should operate,
what reports they should receive and
how they should govern the
management of principal risks. Such
policies have been implemented at
Company as well as subsidiary levels.
On a semi-annual basis, the Executive
Management Team review the key risks
across the Group to ensure they are
being managed within the Company’s
risk appetite. Action plans are drawn up
if any risks are considered to be outside
of the Company’s risk appetite and these
are monitored on a regular basis until
they return to levels back within the
riskappetite.
On a semi-annual basis, the Board and/
or Audit and Risk Committee receive
reports on risk management, the key
risks and the exposures outstanding.
Also included in these reports are the
results of Executive Management Team’s
risk and issue identification discussions
noted above. These meetings also
provide the Directors with the
opportunity to consider any other
issues which management may not
have identified and give direction on
any additional risk management
actions which might be required.
Insurance
The Sancus and subsidiaries insurance
programme is subject to annual review
each year, with cover generally
renewed in April of the following year.
A significant amount of Insurance
cover is held for Public Indemnity,
Directors’ and Officers’ liability, Cyber,
and Crime. Appropriate office and
travel insurance is also in place.
During 2021, the Committee did
notreceive any reports relating to
whistleblowing across the Group.
On behalf of the Audit and Risk
Committee
John Whittle
Chairman Audit and Risk Committee
30 March 2022
Audit and Risk Committee report continued
22 Sancus Annual Report 2021
The Company is committed to the
objective of maximising shareholder
return in the longer term.
John Whittle
Chairman
Remuneration and Nomination Committee
Remuneration and Nomination
Committee
The Remuneration and Nomination
Committee comprises of John Whittle
as Chairman, Steve Smith and Tracy
Clarke. The key duties include, but are
not limited to, agreeing a framework
for Director remuneration, ensuring
management staff are appropriately
incentivised to enhance performance,
and reviewing the effectiveness of the
remuneration policy on an on-going
basis. No Director is involved in
determining their own remuneration.
Remuneration Policy
In February 2020 the Remuneration
Policy was last approved and adopted.
The Company is committed to the
objective of maximising shareholder
return in the longer term. The
remuneration policy aims to be
competitive, aligned with shareholder
interests and relatively simple and
transparent. The Board takes into
consideration the views of significant
shareholders when determining the
remuneration of directors.
The objective is to put in place a
remuneration package that, as a whole:
>
aligns the interests of employees
with that of shareholders and the
success of the Company;
>
is appropriately benchmarked,
suchthat it aids retention and
recruitment; and
>
meets applicable legal or regulatory
requirements, is tax efficient and
simple to implement and administer.
The Board is reviewing the Remuneration
Policy against these objectives.
The Policy is divided into two parts;
the first part in relation to the
remuneration of the Non-Executive
directors of the Company, and the
second part in relation to the
remuneration of the Executive
Directors of the Company.
Maximising shareholder returns
Remuneration report
An ordinary resolution for the approval of the annual remuneration
report will be put to the shareholders at the annual general meeting
to be held in 2022.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
23
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Director
Role
Base
for 2021
Additional
feesfor 2021
Total fees
for 2021
Base
for2020
Additional
fees for 2020
Total fees
for 2020
Patrick Firth*
Non-Executive Director and
Chairman of the Board
£23,333 £10,000
forChairman
of the Board
£33,333 £34,125 £14,625
for Chairman
of the Board
£48,750
Steve Smith**
Non-Executive Director and
Chairman of the Board
£22,446 £5,000
forChairman
of the Board
£27,4 46 - - -
John Whittle
Non-Executive Director,
Chairman of the Audit and Risk
Committee and Chairman of the
Remuneration Committee
£35,000 £5,000
forChairman of
the ARC and
£2,500 for
Chairman of
Rem & Nom Co
£42,500 £34,125 £4,875
for Chairman
of the ARC
and £2,438
for Chairman
of Rem Co
£41,438
Nicholas Wakefield***
Non-Executive Director
£35,000 Nil £35,000 £34,125 Nil £34,125
Total £115,779 £22,500 £138,279 £102,375 £21,938 £124,313
*Pro rata for 2021 as Mr Firth resigned as a Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Board on 31 August 2021.
**Pro rata for 2021 as Mr Smith was appointed to the Board on 11 May 2021 and succeeded Mr Firth as Board Chairman following his resignation.
***Pro rata for 2022 as Mr Wakefield was succeeded by Ms Clark on 8 March 2022.
Remuneration report continued
Each Non-Executive Director receives
afixed fee per annum based on their
role and responsibility within the
Company and the time commitment
required. It is not considered
appropriate that Non-Executive
Directors’ remuneration should be
performance related and none of the
Non-Executive Directors are eligible
for pension benefits, share options,
long-term incentive schemes or other
benefits in respect of their services as
Non-Executive directors of the
Company. Shares held by the Non-
Executive Directors are disclosed
inthe Annual Report.
Pursuant to Article 30.3 of the
Company’s Articles of Incorporation
(the “Articles”) the Board may award
additional remuneration to any
Director engaged in exceptional work
at the request of the Board on a time
spent basis to compensate for the
additional time spent over their
expected time commitment.
The total remuneration of the Non
Executive Directors has not exceeded
the £300,000 per annum limit
(excluding amounts payable in respect
of any out-of-pocket expenses
pursuant to Article 30.2 or any
additional remuneration awarded
pursuant to Article 30.3) pursuant to
an ordinary resolution passed at the
Annual General Meeting of the
Company held on 19 May 2016.
The Articles provide that Non-Executive
Directors retire and offer themselves for
re election at the first annual general
meeting after their appointment and at
least every three years thereafter. A
Non-Executive Director’s appointment
may at any time be terminated by and at
the discretion of either party upon three
months’ written notice. A Non-Executive
Director’s appointment will terminate
immediately without notice (or payment
in lieu of notice) if such director is not
re-appointed at a General Meeting of the
Company (if required under the Articles),
if such director is removed as a director
at a General Meeting of the Company, or
if such director resigns or ceases to be
adirector in accordance with the
provisions of the Articles.
The terms and conditions of
appointment of each Non-Executive
Director are available for inspection
atthe Company’s registered office.
The last independent remuneration
review was carried out in July 2014.
The Directors intend to put in place
aLong-Term Incentive Plan for Senior
Management and an external advisor
will be engaged to assist with this
during the course of 2022 which will
also include a remuneration review.
For comparative purposes the
tablebelow sets out the Non-
Executive Directors’ remuneration
approved and actually paid for the
year to 31 December 2020 as well
asproposed for the year ending
31December 2021 (to be approved at
the 2022 AGM). There has been no
change to the base fee, other than the
fees noted below were reduced by 10%
in the third quarter of 2020 as part of
the Covid-19 cost saving initiative.
Part
1.
Remuneration Policy of Non-Executive Directors
24 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Base Remuneration 31 December 2021 31 December 2020
Andrew Whelan* £260,981 £260,981
Rory Mepham** £220,000 -
Emma Stubbs £170,000 £163,113
Dan Walker £200,000 £175,960
* Mr Whelan resigned on 30 June 2021, and his contract ended on 28 February 2022.
** Mr Mepham was appointed Interim CEO on 30 June 2021 and permanent CEO on 23 November 2022.
Base Remuneration
For the year ended 31 December 2021,
the Executive Directors’ base salary
from the Company, excluding all
reasonable expenses incurred in the
course of their duties which were
reimbursed by the Company, were as
detailed in the table below:
In addition to fixed salary payments,
in2021 the Executive Management
Team members received pension
contributions of £3,278 (Andrew
Whelan), £7,045, Rory Mepham,
£6,299, (Emma Stubbs) and £7,581
(Dan Walker). (2020: £19,478
(AndrewWhelan), £12,174 (Emma
Stubbs), £6,932 (Aaron Le Cornu)
and£9,240 (Dan Walker)).
Long Term Incentives
The Board intends to introduce a
LongTerm Incentive Plan for Senior
Management during 2022 and an
external advisor will be engaged
toassist with this.
Discretionary Executive Bonus
In the year to 31 December 2021
discretionary bonuses in cash of
£125,000, £50,000, £75,000 and
£75,000 were paid to Andrew Whelan,
Rory Mepham, Emma Stubbs and
DanWalker respectively (Year to
31December 2020: discretionary
bonuses of £125,000, £25,000
and£60,000 were paid to
AndrewWhelan, Emma Stubbs
andDan Walker respectively).
On behalf of the Remuneration
Committee
John Whittle
Remuneration Committee Chairman
30 March 2022
Part
2.
Remuneration Policy of Executive Directors
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
25
Sancus Annual Report 2021
The Directors submit their Report
together with the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income,
the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position, the Consolidated Statement of
Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
and the related Notes for the year
ended 31 December 2021, which have
been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting
Standards as adopted by the UK,
inaccordance with any relevant
enactment for the time being in force,
and are in agreement with the
accounting records, which comply
withSection 238 of The Companies
(Guernsey) Law, 2008.
Principal activities
The Company was incorporated and
domiciled in Guernsey, Channel Islands,
as a company limited by shares and with
limited liability on 9 June 2005 in
accordance with The Companies
(Guernsey) Law, 1994 (since superseded
by The Companies (Guernsey) Law,
2008). Until 25 March 2015, the
Company was Authorised as a Closed-
ended Investment Scheme and was
subject to the Authorised Closed-ended
Investment Scheme Rules 2008 issued
by the Guernsey Financial Services
Commission (“GFSC”). On 25 March
2015, the Company was registered with
the GFSC as a Non-Regulated Financial
Services Business, at which point the
Company’s authorised fund status was
revoked. The Company’s Ordinary
Shares were admitted to the AIM market
of the London Stock Exchange on
5Augu5 August 2005. The ZDPs were listed
and traded on the main market of the
London Stock Exchange with effect
from5 Ofrom 5 October 2015 and following
shareholder approval now have a
maturity date of 5 December 2022.
The Company’s 2021 bonds were repaid
on 21 December 2021 and a total of
£12.575m principal of new bonds
(the“New Bonds”) were issued on
22December 2021. The New Bonds are
not listed and have an interest rate of 7%.
The Company does not have a fixed
life and the Articles do not contain
anytrigger events for a voluntary
liquidation of the Company.
Following the approval by Shareholders
at the Company AGM on 19 May 2016,
the Company changed its status from
being an investing company for the
purpose of the AIM rules to a trading
Company.
The Executive Management Team
isresponsible for the day-to-day
management of the Company.
The Group
As at 31 December 2021, the Group
comprises the Company and the
entities disclosed in Note 20 to the
financial statements.
Directors and Executive
Management Team of
theCompany
A list of the Directors and the
Executive Management Team who
served the Company during the year
and as at the date of this report is
shown on page 14.
Results and Dividends
The Group results for the year are set out
on page 35. No Dividends were paid
during the year (31 December 2020: Nil).
Substantial shareholdings
As at 31 December 2021, the Company
was aware of the following substantial
shareholders who held 3% or more of
issued share capital of the Company:
Substantial Shareholdings
Number of ordinary
shares held
Percentage of total
ordinary shares
issued held
Somerston Group 200,349,684 40.90%
Philip J Milton & Company plc 86,793,928 17.72 %
Investec Wealth and Investment 16,590,873 3.39%
DBH Global Holdings 15,603,285 3.19%
Chelverton Asset Management 14,700,000 3.00%
Directors’ interests
As at 31 December 2021, the Directors
had the following beneficial interests in
the Ordinary Shares of the Company:
31 December 2021 31 December 2020
Directors’ Interests
No. of
Ordinary
Shares Held
% of Ordinary
Shares
No. of
Ordinary
Shares Held
% of Ordinary
Shares
John Whittle 138,052 0.03 138,052 0.03
Nick Wakefield - - - -
Emma Stubbs 1,380,940 0.28 1,380,940 0.28
Steve Smith (Chairman) - -
Rory Mepham - - - -
Statement of Directors’
Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for
preparing the financial statements in
accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted
by the United Kingdom (UK), and The
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 for
each financial period to give a true and
fair view of the state of affairs of the
Group as at the end of the financial year
and of the profit or loss for that period.
International Accounting Standard 1
requires that financial statements
present fairly for each financial period
the Group’s financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. This
requires faithful representation of the
effects of transactions, other events and
conditions in accordance with the
definitions and recognition criteria for
assets, liabilities, income and expenses
set out in the International Accounting
Standards Board’s “Framework for the
preparation and presentation of
financial statements”. In virtually all
circumstances a fair presentation will be
achieved by compliance with all IFRSs
as adopted by the UK.
Directors’ report
26 Sancus Annual Report 2021
In preparing these financial statements,
the Directors are required to:
>
Ensure that the financial statements
comply with the Memorandum and
Articles of Incorporation and IFRSs,
as adopted by the United Kingdom;
>
Select suitable accounting policies
and apply them consistently;
>
Present information including
accounting policies, in a manner
that provides relevant, reliable,
comparable and understandable
information;
>
Make judgements and estimates that
are reasonable and prudent; and
>
Prepare the financial statements on
the going concern basis unless it is
inappropriate to presume that the
Company and the Group will
continue in business.
The Directors confirm that they have
complied with the above requirements
in preparing the financial statements.
The Directors are responsible for
keeping proper accounting records
which disclose with reasonable
accuracy at any time the financial
position of the Company and the
Group and enable them to ensure that
the financial statements have been
properly prepared in accordance with
The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.
They are also responsible for
safeguarding the assets of the
Company and the Group and hence
for taking reasonable steps for the
prevention and detection of fraud
andother irregularities.
The Directors also confirm that
theannual report and financial
statements, taken as a whole, is fair,
balanced and understandable and
provides the information necessary
forshareholders to assess the Group
and Company’s performance,
businessmodel and strategy.
Internal controls review
Taking into account the ongoing work
of the Audit and Risk Committee in
monitoring the risk management and
internal control systems on behalf of
the Board the Directors have
conducted a robust assessment of the
principal risks and uncertainties faced
by the Group as set out on page 10
and is satisfied that each of these has
been properly identified and is being
effectively managed through the
operation of appropriate internal
controls and risk management
systems, within the constraints
oftheresources of the Group.
Statement as to Disclosure
ofInformation to Auditor
The Directors who held office at the
date of approval of this Directors’
Report confirm that:
>
There is no relevant audit information
of which the Company’s auditors is
unaware; and
>
The Directors have taken all steps
that they ought to have taken to
make themselves aware of any
relevant audit information and to
establish that the auditors are
aware of that information.
Auditor
Moore Stephens have indicated their
willingness to continue in office and a
resolution to re-appoint Moore Stephens
will be tabled at the forthcoming AGM.
Going Concern
The Directors have considered the going
concern basis in the preparation of the
financial statements as supported by the
Director’s assessment of the Company’s
and Group’s ability to pay its debts as
they fall due and have assessed the
current position and the principal risks
facing the business with a view to
assessing the prospects of the Company.
Liabilities which fall due in the next
12months include the final capital
entitlement of the Company’s ZDP
shares which are repayable on
5December 2022 at £11.3m.
As part of the Group’s growth plan
theCompany is considering its options
regarding this liability which may include
re-financing, part repayment and/or
extension of the ZDPs and an equity
raise. This will require consultation
with the relevant stakeholders,
including ordinary shareholders and
ZDP shareholders and regulatory
approvals and consents. Accordingly,
there can be no certainty that the
proposals will proceed.
These factors and assumptions
constitute a material uncertainty that
may cast significant doubt over the
Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern, such that it may be
unable to realise its assets and
discharge its liabilities in the normal
course of business. The Directors
expect that if they are able to action
the mitigations in accordance with the
plan outlined above, the material
uncertainty will be extinguished. The
Directors are therefore of the opinion
that the Company will have adequate
financial resources to continue in
operation and meet its liabilities as
they fall due for the foreseeable future
and continue to adopt the going
concern basis in preparing the
financial statements.
Board succession
The Board notes the resignation of
Patrick Firth in August 2021 and the
appointment of Steve Smith who
succeeded Mr Firth as Chairman of the
Board on his resignation. The Directors
remain focussed on ensuring the
Board is comprised of individuals with
the requisite skills, knowledge,
experience and diversity to operate
effectively and to meet the future
leadership needs of the Company.
TheBoard welcomes the appointment
of Ms Tracy Clarke who succeeded
MrNick Wakefield in March 2022 as
the Somerston appointed Board
representative.
Approved and signed on behalf of the
Board of Directors on 30 March 2022.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
27
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Consolidated
financialstatements
Contents
Consolidated financial
statements
Independent auditor’s report
to the members of Sancus
Lending Group Limited 29
Consolidated statement
of comprehensive income 35
Consolidated statement
of financial position 36
Consolidated statement
of changes in
shareholders’ equity 38
Consolidated statement
of cash flows 39
Notes to the
financial statements 40
Officers and
professional advisers 72
For the year ended 31 December 2021
28 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements
of Sancus Lending Group Limited (the
‘company’ or the ‘parent company and
its subsidiaries together as the ‘group’)
for the year ended 31December 2021
which comprise ofthe Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income,
Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position, Consolidated Statement of
Cash Flows, the Consolidated
Statements ofChanges in Equity and
notes to thefinancial statements,
including asummary of significant
accounting policies. The financial
reporting framework that has been
applied in their preparation is
applicable law andInternational
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs)
as adopted by the United Kingdom
and, as regards the Group’s consolidated
financial statements, as applied in
accordance with the provisions of
theCompanies Act 2006.
In our opinion:
>
the financial statements give a true
and fair view of the state of the
group’s affairs as at 31 December
2021 and of the group’s loss for the
year then ended;
>
the group financial statements
havebeen properly prepared in
accordance with IFRSs as adopted
by the United Kingdom; and
>
the Group’s financial statements
have been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance
with International Standards on
Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and
applicable law. Our responsibilities
under those standards are further
described in the Auditor’s
Responsibilities for the audit of the
financial statements section of our
report. We are independent of the
Group, in accordance with the ethical
requirements that are relevant to our
audit of the financial statements in
Guernsey, including the FRC’s Ethical
Standard as applied to listed entities,
and we have fulfilled our other ethical
responsibilities in accordance with
these requirements. We believe that
the audit evidence we have obtained
issufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our opinion.
Material uncertainty related
togoing concern
We draw attention to Note 2(a) in the
financial statements, which sets out
that the company’s ZDP shares are
repayable on 5 December 2022 at
£11.3 million and that the company is
considering its options regarding this
liability. As stated in Note 2(a), this
indicates that a material uncertainty
exists that may cast significant doubt
on the company’s ability to continue
as a going concern. Our opinion is not
modified in respect of this matter.
In auditing the financial statements,
we have concluded that the directors’
use of the going concern basis of
accounting in the preparation of the
Group’s consolidated financial
statements is appropriate. Our
evaluation of the directors’ assessment
of the entity’s ability to continue to
adopt the going concern basis of
accounting included Review of board
and treasury minutes, subsequent year
financial forecasts and management’s
going concern assessment.
Our responsibilities and the
responsibilities of the directors with
respect to going concern are described
in the relevant sections of this report.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters
that, in our professional judgement,
were of most significance in our audit of
the financial statements of the current
period and include the most significant
assessed risks of material misstatement
(whether or not due to fraud) we
identified, including those which had the
greatest effect on: the overall audit
strategy, the allocation of resources in
the audit; and directing the efforts of
the engagement team. These matters
were addressed in the context of our
audit of the financial statements as a
whole, and in forming our opinion
thereon, and we do not provide a
separate opinion on these matters.
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Sancus Lending Group Limited
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
29
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Audit Matter Procedures
Impairment of Goodwill
As at 31 December 2021, the Group has
recorded goodwill of £22.9m (2020:
£22.9m) representing 23.1% (2020: 22%)
ofgroup total assets at year end. Discounted
cash flow models are prepared by
management to assist the Board and the
Audit and Risk Committee in determining
whether indicators of impairment exist and
estimating the recoverable amount of
goodwill, based on information available
at30 June 2021. The management
believesthat there is no further change till
31December 2021.
The risk is explained further in the Strategic
report where this is included as a key risk of
misstatement. Note 2(h) and Note 3 set out
the associated accounting policy and disclosure
in respect of critical judgements and key
sources of estimation uncertainty, with
Note12 setting out details of the impairment
tests and goodwill valuation sensitivities.
We obtained our understanding of how the discounted cash flow forecasts are modelled
aspart of the Board’s processes to identify and recognise impairment. With regards to
valuation, we performed the following procedures:
We obtained an understanding of the relevant controls over the impairment assessment process;
We have reviewed and checked the key assumptions to the cash flows including revenue
growth rates, discount rates, the potential impacts of Covid-19 and future income and
expenditure cash flows, and tested for any inconsistencies with our understanding of the
group’s business model;
We internally performed stress testing on the key assumptions to determine the impact
onthe recoverable amount of goodwill and whether this would lead to any impairment;
We checked the critical model assumptions related to the cash flow and growth rate
assumptions, which were used in the forecast to model the recovery to pre-Covid-19 levels
of loan origination, by assessing trends in external sector reports, evaluating the expected
cash flows from the loan pipeline and loans originated post impairment test date;
We agreed inputs to supporting evidence where appropriate;
We reviewed the models prepared by management for consistency with the requirements
of IAS 36;
We challenged management’s assertion that no further impairment triggers exist at the
balance sheet date, considering the sources of information to identify such indicators as
listed in IAS 36 Impairment of Assets; and
We reviewed the disclosures made per requirements of IAS 36.
Based on our audit work, we concur with management that the goodwill balance was not
impaired as at 31 December 2021.
As described in Note 3 to the financial statements, we noted that management have
assumed a recovery to pre-Covid-19 levels of loan issuance in 2021 in their forecasts and
should this not occur, this could lead to future impairment.
Note 12 to the financial statements describes the underlying sensitivity of the key inputs used.
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Sancus Lending Group Limited continued
30 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Audit Matter Procedures
Impairment and recoverability of loans receivable
As at 31 December 2021, the aggregate value
of Sancus loans amounted to £53.24m
(2020: £53.22m) representing 54.89% of
total assets (2020: 51.7%). The loan portfolio
comprises property-backed (Sancus) and
Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (“SME”)
loans (via BMS Finance (UK) Sarl). Through
Sancus, the group has direct exposure to
loans through co-investment alongside
third-party lenders.
The group has also provided a first loss
guarantee as part of the Sancus Loan Note
structures and has direct investment into
loan SPVs including BMS Finance (UK) Sarl.
The value of these assets are also supported
by the underlying loan book. Management is
required to assess loans for impairment,
including the application of the expected
credit loss (‘ECL’) model under IFRS 9.
In making this assessment, management
makes several significant judgements.
Theseinclude determining appropriate
assumptions for calculating the loss
allowance under IFRS9 (including probability
of default and loss given default), as well as
loan-specific matters including cash flow
forecasts and covenant compliance,
specifically related to loan to value (LTV)
ratio. As a result, errors or deliberate
manipulation of these determining factors
could result in material misstatement of the
financial statements, as such it is considered
as a fraud key audit matter.
The risk is explained further in the strategic
report where this is included as a key risk of
misstatement. Note 2(f) and Note 3 set out
the associated accounting policy and
disclosure in respect of critical judgements
and key sources of estimation uncertainty,
with Note 22 setting out details of the
associated risk factors, including credit risk.
We have performed the following procedures:
We have obtained an understanding of significant controls over the loan’s impairment process;
Performed a walk-through of relevant controls in the valuation process to confirm they
were appropriately designed and implemented;
We have tested, on a sample basis, inputs used in the ‘Loans Monitoring Report’, including
the accuracy of covenant calculations, such as loan to value ratios, collateral values, and
other financial and non-financial information;
We have checked the reasonableness of management’s significant judgments relating to
the categorisation of loans into the various credit stages required under IFRS 9. We have
considered this in relevance to management’s definition of a significant increase in credit
risk (‘SICR’) and the definition of default and performed a review of the Loan Monitoring
Report to assess evidence of changes in credit risk resulting from factors such as:
>
exceedances in LTV;
>
covenant breaches;
>
delinquencies in payments; or
>
other signs of financial stress.
We also checked the reasonableness of management’s assumptions related to the
recoverable value of any non-performing loans in light of available evidence and the
underlying collateral;
We have checked the reasonableness of management’s assumptions relating to their
capital market expectations, such as Covid-19, including any overlays required to
compensate for the change in the market environment not reflected in the ECL model;
We have evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgements and estimates in
deriving the probability of default (PD), determining the loss given default (LGD) and
exposure at default (EAD) for each stage within which loans are classified and their
compliance with IFRS 9 requirements;
We tested the numerical accuracy of the ECL calculation based on the above inputs; and
We evaluated the adequacy of disclosures made in the financial statements in light of the
requirements of IFRS 7 and IFRS 9.
We have concluded that the overall carrying value of loans is reasonable.
As described in Note 3 to the financial statements, IFRS 9 requires the application of
aprobability-weighted unbiased estimate in determining the ECL on loans; there are
therefore certain loans where the amounts recovered could be materially different to
theestimate at 31 December 2021.
Note 22 to the financial statements describes the underlying sensitivity of the key inputs used.
Revenue recognition
The Group’s revenue for the year ended 31
December 2021 was £9m (2020: £10.86m) of
which £5.39m (2020: £5.53m) sourced from
interest income and fees enforced as per
lending agreements and £3.62m (2020:
£5.33m) was from interest on loans.
We consider revenue as a presumed
fraudrisk and have directed our tests
towards this risk
We have performed the following procedures:
We have obtained reports from the Loan Management System (“LMS”), related to interest
income and tested on sample basis by recalculating interest income and comparing it with
the amounts accounted in the general ledger.
We also performed analytical review to test the reasonableness of interest income.
For fee income, we have verified on sample basis, fee from various contracts and tested
foraccuracy.
We have concluded that the reported revenue is presented fairly.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
31
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Our application of materiality
We define materiality as the
magnitude of misstatement in the
financial statements that makes it
probable that the economic decisions
of a reasonably knowledgeable person
would be changed or influenced. We
use materiality both in planning the
scope of our audit work and in
evaluating the results of our work.
Based on our professional judgement,
we determined materiality for the
financial statements as a whole as
shown in the table to the right:
We have also adopted a lower level
ofmateriality for revenue balances
consistent with the prior year audit.
Weconsider revenue to be a critical
performance measure for the group
asit is expected to be a key driver for
future distributions from profits now the
group has further developed its SME
and property backed lending business.
The lower level materiality applied
was£180k (2020: £177k), being
approximately 2% (2020: 1.7%) of total
revenue. We agreed with the Audit
and Risk Committee that this was
appropriate as revenue balances are
relatively low compared to our overall
group materiality set out above, yet
there is an increasing focus on these
as performance measures.
Performance materiality
We set performance materiality at a
level lower than materiality to reduce
the probability that, in aggregate,
uncorrected and undetected
misstatements exceed the materiality
for the financial statements as a whole.
Group performance materiality was
set at 60% of group materiality for the
2021 audit (2020: 60%). In determining
performance materiality, we
considered the following factors:
>
Our risk assessment, including our
assessment of the group’s overall
control environment and that we
consider it appropriate to rely on
controls on a key business process;
>
Our past experience of the audit,
which has indicated a low number
of uncorrected misstatements
identified in prior periods; and
>
The potential impact of Covid-19 on
the application of control procedures
which might increase the possibility
of having undetected misstatements.
Error reporting threshold
We agreed with the Audit and Risk
Committee that we would report to
theCommittee all audit differences in
excess of £23k (2020: £33k), as well as
differences below that threshold that,
inour view, warranted reporting on
qualitative grounds. We also report
tothe Audit and Risk Committee on
disclosure matters that we identified
when assessing the overall presentation
of the financial statements.
An overview of the scope
ofouraudit
Our audit was scoped by obtaining an
understanding of the group and its
environment, including internal control,
and assessing the risks of material
misstatement for the parent company
and its subsidiaries. Audit work to
respond to the risks of material
misstatement was performed directly
by the group audit team for both the
parent entity and its subsidiaries. All
subsidiaries in the group were subject
to full scope audits.
Audit work performed for the
subsidiaries was executed by the
group audit team at levels of
materiality applicable to each
subsidiary, which in all instances was
lower than group materiality and
ranged between £4.4k and £1,006k
(2020: between £9.7k and £557k).
Other information
The directors are responsible for
theother information. The other
information comprises the information
included in the annual report, other
than the financial statements and our
auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion
on the financial statements does not
cover the other information and,
except to the extent otherwise
explicitly stated in our report, we do
not express any form of assurance
conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the
financial statements, our responsibility
is to read the other information and, in
doing so, consider whether the other
information is materially inconsistent
with the financial statements or our
knowledge obtained in the audit or
otherwise appears to be materially
misstated. If we identify such material
inconsistencies or apparent material
misstatements, we are required to
determine whether there is a material
misstatement in the financial
statements or a material misstatement
of the other information. If, based on
the work we have performed, we
conclude that there is a material
misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Group Materiality
£450k
Basis
2% of net assets
Rationale
Considered as most appropriate based on the significance of the on balance
sheet lending and goodwill balances. In determining performance materiality,
weconsidered the following significant judgements:
>
Our risk assessment, including our assessment of the Group’s overall
control environment; and
>
No past audit experience with the Group.
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Sancus Lending Group Limited continued
32 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Matters on which we are
required to report by exception
In the light of the knowledge and
understanding of the Group and the
parent company and its environment
obtained in the course of the audit,
wehave not identified material
misstatements in the strategic report
or the directors’ report.
We have nothing to report in respect
of the following matters where the
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008
requires us to report to you if, in
ouropinion:
>
adequate accounting records have
not been kept by the parent
company, or returns adequate for
our audit have not been received
from branches not visited by us; or
>
the consolidated financial
statements are not in agreement
with the accounting records and
returns; or
>
certain disclosures of directors’
remuneration specified by law
arenot made; or
>
we have not received all the
information and explanations
werequire for our audit.
Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the directors’
responsibilities statement set out on
page 26, the directors are responsible
for the preparation of the financial
statements and for being satisfied that
they give a true and fair view, and for
such internal control as the directors
determine is necessary to enable the
preparation of financial statements that
are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements,
the directors are responsible for
assessing the group’s ability to
continue as a going concern,
disclosing, as applicable, matters
related to going concern and using
thegoing concern basis of accounting
unless the directors either intend to
liquidate the group or to cease
operations, or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the
audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial
statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s
report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of
assurance, but is not a guarantee that
an audit conducted in accordance with
ISAs (UK) will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or
error and are considered material if,
individually or in aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on
the basis of these financial statements.
A further description of our
responsibilities for the audit of the
financial statements is located on the
Financial Reporting Council’s website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities.
This description forms part of our
auditor’s report.
Irregularities, including fraud, are
instances of non-compliance with laws
and regulations. We design procedures
in line with our responsibilities,
outlined above, to detect material
misstatements in respect of
irregularities, including fraud. The
extent to which our procedures are
capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud is detailed below.
Explanation as to what extent
the audit was considered
capable of detecting
irregularities, including fraud
The objectives of our audit in respect
of fraud, are; to identify and assess the
risks of material misstatement of the
financial statements due to fraud; to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding the assessed risks
of material misstatement due to fraud,
through designing and implementing
appropriate responses to those
assessed risks; and to respond
appropriately to instances of fraud or
suspected fraud identified during the
audit. However, the primary
responsibility for the prevention and
detection of fraud rests with both
management and those charged with
governance of the company.
Our approach was as follows:
>
We obtained an understanding of the
legal and regulatory requirements
applicable to the company and
considered that the most significant
are the Companies (Guernsey) Law,
2008, International Financial
Reporting Standards as adopted by
the UK, and taxation legislation.
>
We obtained an understanding of
how the company complies with
these requirements by discussions
with management and those
charged with governance.
>
We assessed the risk of material
misstatement of the financial
statements, including the risk of
material misstatement due to fraud
and how it might occur, by holding
discussions with management and
those charged with governance.
>
We inquired of management and
those charged with governance
asto any known instances of
non-compliance or suspected
non-compliance with laws and
regulations.
>
Based on this understanding, we
designed specific appropriate audit
procedures to identify instances of
non-compliance with laws and
regulations. This included making
enquiries of management and those
charged with governance and
obtaining additional corroborative
evidence as required.
As part of an audit in accordance with
ISAs (UK) we exercise professional
judgement and maintain professional
scepticism throughout the audit.
Wealso:
>
Identify and assess the risks of
material misstatement of the
financial statements, whether due to
fraud or error, design and perform
audit procedures responsive to
those risks, and obtain audit
evidence that is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for
our opinion. The risk of not detecting
a material misstatement resulting
from fraud is higher than for one
resulting from error, as fraud may
involve collusion, forgery, intentional
omissions, misrepresentations, or
the override of internal control.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
33
Sancus Annual Report 2021
>
Obtain an understanding of internal
control relevant to the audit in order
to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purposes of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the
group’s internal control.
>
Evaluate the appropriateness of
accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures
made by the directors.
>
Conclude on the appropriateness
ofthe directors’ use of the going
concern basis of accounting and,
based on the audit evidence
obtained, whether a material
uncertainty exists related to events
or conditions that may cast
significant doubt on the group’s
ability to continue as a going
concern. If we conclude that a
material uncertainty exists, we are
required to draw attention in our
auditor’s report to the related
disclosures in the financial
statements or, if such disclosures
are inadequate, to modify our
opinion. Our conclusions are based
on the audit evidence obtained up
to the date of our auditor’s report.
However, future events or conditions
may cause the group to cease to
continue as a going concern.
>
Evaluate the overall presentation,
structure and content of the financial
statements, including the disclosures,
and whether the financial statements
represent the underlying transactions
and events in a manner that achieves
fair presentation.
>
Obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding the financial
information of the entities or business
activities within the group to express
an opinion on the consolidated
financial statements. We are
responsible for the direction,
supervision and performance of the
group audit. We remain solely
responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with those charged
with governance regarding, among
other matters, the planned scope and
timing of the audit and significant
audit findings, including any significant
deficiencies in internal control that we
identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with
governance with a statement that we
have complied with relevant ethical
requirements regarding independence,
and to communicate with them all
relationships and other matters that
may reasonably be thought to bear on
our independence, and where
applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with
those charged with governance, we
determine those matters that were of
most significance in the audit of the
consolidated financial statements of
thecurrent period and are therefore the
key audit matters. We describe these
matters in our auditor’s report unless law
or regulation precludes public disclosure
about the matter or when, in extremely
rare circumstances, we determine that
amatter should not be communicated
inour report because the adverse
consequences of doing so would
reasonably be expected to outweigh
thepublic interest benefits of such
communication.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the
company’s members, as a body, in
accordance with Section 262 of the
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008. Our
audit work has been undertaken so that
we might state to the company’s
members those matters we are required
to state to them in an auditor’s report
and for no other purpose. To the fullest
extent permitted by law, we do not
accept or assume responsibility to
anyone other than the company and the
company’s members as a body, for our
audit work, for this report, or for the
opinions we have formed.
Jeff Vincent (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of Moore Stephens
Audit and Assurance (Guernsey)
Limited
Level 2 Park Place
Park Street
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 3HZ
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Sancus Lending Group Limited continued
34 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Notes
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Revenue 5 9,022 10,861
Cost of sales 6 (6,537) (6,118)
Gross profit 2,485 4,743
Operating expenses 7 (6,231) (5,582)
Operating loss before credit losses (3,746) (839)
Changes in expected credit losses 22 (6,399) (4,665)
Incurred losses on financial assets (90) -
Operating Loss (10,235) (5,504)
FinTech Ventures fair value movement 22 434 (5,996)
Other net losses 8 (557) (3,032)
Loss for the year before tax (10,358) (14,532)
Income tax 18 19 15
Loss for the year after tax (10,339) (14,517)
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit and loss
Foreign exchange gain/(loss) arising on consolidation 12 (23)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year after tax 12 (23)
Total comprehensive loss for the year (10,327) (14,540)
Loss for the year after tax attributable to equity holders of the company (10,339) (14,517)
Total comprehensive loss attributable to equity holders of the company (10,327) (14,540)
Basic Loss per Ordinary Share 10 (2.16)p (4.60)p
Diluted Loss per Ordinary Share 10 (2.09)p (4.19)p
The accompanying Notes on pages 40 to 71 form an integral part of these financial statements.
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
35
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Notes
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Fixed assets 11 660 774
Goodwill 12 22,894 22,894
Other intangible assets 13 53 168
Sancus loans and loan equivalents 22 6,643 3,863
FinTech Ventures investments 22 500 -
Other investments 100 -
Investments in joint ventures and associates 9 500 866
Total non-current assets 31,350 28,565
Current assets
Other assets 14 496 1,015
Sancus loans and loan equivalents 22 46,602 49,369
Trade and other receivables 15 6,075 8,204
Cash and cash equivalents 12,436 15,786
Total current assets 65,609 74,374
Total assets 96,959 102,939
Consolidated statement of financial position
For the year ended 31 December 2021
36 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Notes
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
EQUITY
Share premium 16 116,218 116,218
Treasury shares 16 (1,172) (1,099)
Other reserves (95,952) (85,625)
Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the Group 19,094 29,494
Total equity 19,094 29,494
LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 64,677 69,450
Lease liabilities 364 469
Total non-current liabilities 17 65,041 69,919
Current liabilities
Borrowings 10,532 -
Trade and other payables 1,628 1,638
Tax liabilities 86 118
Provisions - 1,542
Lease liabilities 212 188
Interest payable 366 -
Other liabilities - 40
Total current liabilities 17 12,824 3,526
Total liabilities 77,865 73,445
Total equity and liabilities 96,959 102,939
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 30 March 2022 and were signed on its behalf by:
Director: Stephen Smith Director: John Whittle
The accompanying Notes on pages 40 to 71 form an integral part of these financial statements.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
37
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Note
Share
Premium
£’000
Treasury
Shares
£’000
Warrants
Outstanding
£’000
Foreign
Exchange
Reserve
£’000
Retained
Earnings/
(Losses)
£’000
Capital and
reserves
attributable
to equity
holders
ofthe
Company
£’000
Balance at 1 January 2021 116,218 (1,099) 847 (1) (86,471) 29,494
Acquired on sale of BMS 16 - (73) - - - (73)
Movement in fair value
ofwarrants
16 - - (462) - 462 -
Transactions with owners - (73) (462) - 462 (73)
Total comprehensive income/
loss for the year
- - - 12 (10,339) (10,327)
Balance at 31 December 2021 116,218 (1,172) 385 11 (96,348) 19,094
Balance at 1 January 2020 112,557 (1,099) - 22 (71,107) 40,373
Warrants issued during theyear 16 - - 847 - (847) -
Equity raised (net of costs) 16 3,661 - - - - 3,661
Transactions with owners 3,661 - 847 - (847) 3,661
Total comprehensive loss
forthe year
- - - (23) (14,517) (14,540)
Balance at 31 December 2020 116,218 (1,099) 847 (1) (86,471) 29,494
Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity
For the year ended 31 December 2021
38 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Notes
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Cash flow from operations, excluding loan movements 19 (4,121) (3,837)
(Increase)/Decrease in Sancus loans (1,340) 5,060
Decrease in loans through platforms 8 18
(Increase)/Decrease in Sancus Loans Limited loans (4,564) 472
Decrease in loans re: UK SARL 1,808 3,581
Investment in Sancus Loan Notes (100) -
Net Cash flows (used in) / from operating activities (8,309) 5,294
Investing activities
Net investments in FinTech Ventures (66) 277
Investment in Sancus (IOM) Holdings Limited (16) -
Investment in joint venture (91) (100)
Cash outflow on disposal of BMS Finance AB Limited - (215)
Expenditure on SPL Properties (157) (229)
Sale of SPL Properties 743 1,597
Property, equipment and other intangibles acquired (14) (29)
Net cash inflow from investing activities 399 1,301
Financing activities
Drawdown of HIT facility 19 7,500 4,187
Repayment of HIT facility 19 - (3,500)
Capital element of lease payments 19 (193) (216)
Proceeds from equity issued - 3,681
Repayment of bonds 19 - (6,125)
Issue of bonds 19 - 8,700
Debt issue costs 19 (3) (314)
Repayment of ZDPs 19 (2,756) (4,443)
Net cash generated by financing activities 4,548 1,970
Effects of foreign exchange 12 (23)
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents (3,350) 8,542
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 15,786 7,244
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 12,436 15,786
The accompanying Notes on pages 40 to 71 form an integral part of these financial statements.
Consolidated statement of cash flows
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
39
Sancus Annual Report 2021
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Sancus Lending Group Limited (formerly GLI Finance Limited), (the “Company”), and together with its subsidiaries,
(“theGroup”) was incorporated, and domiciled in Guernsey, Channel Islands, as a company limited by shares and with
limited liability, on 9 June 2005 in accordance with The Companies (Guernsey) Law, 1994 (since superseded by The
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008). Until 25 March 2015, the Company was an Authorised Closed-ended Investment
Scheme and was subject to the Authorised Closed-ended Investment Scheme Rules 2008 issued by the Guernsey
Financial Services Commission (“GFSC”). On 25 March 2015, the Company was registered with the GFSC as a Non-
Regulated Financial Services Business, at which point the Company’s authorised fund status was revoked. The Company’s
Ordinary Shares were admitted to trading on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange on 5 August 2005 and its
issued ZDPs were listed and traded on the Standard listing Segment of the main market of the London Stock Exchange
with effect from 5 October 2015.
The Company does not have a fixed life and the Articles do not contain any trigger events for a voluntary liquidation of
the Company. The Company is an operating company for the purpose of the AIM rules. The Executive Management Team
is responsible for the management of the Company.
As at 31 December 2021, the Group comprises the Company and its subsidiaries (Note 20). During 2021 as part of the
Group’s rebranding the Company and a number of its subsidiaries have been renamed:
Previous name New name Date of name change
Sancus BMS Group Limited Sancus Group Holdings Limited 17 March 2021
Sancus BMS (Ireland) Limited Sancus Lending (Ireland) Limited 29 March 2021
GLI Finance Limited Sancus Lending Group Limited 11 May 2021
Sancus (Guernsey) Limited Sancus Lending (Guernsey) Limited 12 July 2021
Sancus Funding Limited Sancus Lending (UK) Limited 13 July 2021
Sancus Finance Limited Sancus Holdings (UK) Limited 13 July 2021
Sancus (Jersey) Limited Sancus Lending (Jersey) Limited 6 October 2021
Sancus (Gibraltar) Limited Sancus Lending (Gibraltar) Limited 6 October 2021
The Company has taken advantage of the exemption conferred by the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, Section 244,
not to prepare company only financial statements.
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(“IFRS”), as adopted by the UK, and all applicable requirements of Guernsey Company Law. The financial statements have
been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified for the measurement of investment at fair value through
profit or loss. With the exception of any new and amended accounting standards which require policy changes, detailed
in Note 2(v), the principal accounting policies of the Group have remained unchanged from the previous year and are set
out below. Comparative information in the primary statements is given for the year ended 31 December 2020.
The Group does not operate in an industry where significant or cyclical variations, as a result of seasonal activity,
areexperienced during any particular financial period.
Going Concern
The Directors have considered the going concern basis in the preparation of the financial statements as supported by the
Director’s assessment of the Company’s and Group’s ability to pay its debts as they fall due and have assessed the current
position and the principal risks facing the business with a view to assessing the prospects of the Company.
Liabilities which fall due in the next 12 months include the final capital entitlement of the Company’s ZDP shares which are
repayable on 5 December 2022 at £11.3m.
As part of the Group’s growth plan the Company is considering its options regarding this liability which may include
re-financing, part repayment and/or extension of the ZDPs and an equity raise. This will require consultation with the
relevant stakeholders, including ordinary shareholders and ZDP shareholders and regulatory approvals and consents.
Accordingly, there can be no certainty that the proposals will proceed.
Notes to the financial statements
For the year ended 31 December 2021
40 Sancus Annual Report 2021
These factors and assumptions constitute a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt over the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern, such that it may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the
normal course of business. The Directors expect that if they are able to action the mitigations in accordance with the plan
outlined above, the material uncertainty will be extinguished. The Directors are therefore of the opinion that the Company
will have adequate financial resources to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due for the foreseeable
future and continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
(b) Basis of consolidation
The financial statements comprise the results of Sancus Lending Group and its subsidiaries for the year ended
31December 2021. The subsidiaries are all entities where the Company has the power to control the investee, is exposed,
or has rights to variable returns and has the ability to use its power to affect these returns. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated
from the date on which control is transferred to the Company. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.
Profit or loss and other comprehensive income of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year is recognised from
the effective date of acquisition, or up to the effective date of disposal, as applicable. Intercompany transactions, balances
and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated in full on consolidation.
(c) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks and other short term highly liquid
investments that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of
changes in value.
(d) Dividends
Dividend distributions are made at the discretion of the Company. A dividend distribution to shareholders is accounted
for as a reduction in retained earnings. A proposed dividend is recognised as a liability in the period in which it has been
approved and declared by the Directors.
(e) Expenditure
All expenses are accounted for on an accrual basis. Management fees, administration fees, finance costs and all other
expenses (excluding share issue expenses which are offset against share premium) are charged through the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income.
(f) Financial assets and liabilities
Classification, recognition and initial measurement
Classification and measurement of debt assets is driven by the business model for managing the financial assets and
thecontractual cash flow characteristics of those financial assets. There are three principal classification categories for
financial assets that are debt instruments: (i) amortised cost, (ii) fair value through other comprehensive income and
(iii)fair value through profit and loss. Equity investments in the scope of IFRS 9 are measured at fair value with gains
andlosses recognised in profit and loss unless an irrevocable election is made to recognise gains or losses in other
comprehensive income.
We are a lending business, which participates in financing to borrowers, Sancus loans, HIT loans, loan equivalents and loans
through platforms. As a result all of these loans/loan equivalents are held solely for the collection of contractual cash flows, being
interest, fees and payment of principal. These assets are held at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, adjusted
for any credit loss allowance.
FinTech Ventures investments relate to equity, preference shares and some working capital loans. Whilst some of these
investments attract interest, the assets are held primarily to assist the development of the entities involved. These
investments are held at fair value with charges recognised in profit and loss.
Trade payables, financial liabilities and trade receivables are held solely for the collection and payment of contractual cash
flows, being payments of principal and interest where applicable. Trade receivables are held at amortised cost using the
effective interest rate method, adjusted for any credit loss allowance. Trade payables and financial liabilities are held at
amortised cost with any interest cost calculated in accordance with the effective interest rate.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are initially recognised on the trade date, which is the date on which the Group
becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value, with
transaction costs recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. Financial assets and financial
liabilities not at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly
attributable to their acquisition or issue.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
41
Sancus Annual Report 2021
2.ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
(f) Financial assets and liabilities continued
Classification, recognition and initial measurement continued
Subsequent to initial recognition, financial assets are either measured at fair value or amortised cost as noted above.
Realised gains and losses arising on the derecognition of financial assets and liabilities are recognised in the period
inwhich they arise. The effect of discounting on trade and other receivables is not considered to be material.
Fair value measurement
“Fair value” is the price that would be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or, in its absence, the most advantageous market
to which the Group has access at that date. The fair value of a liability reflects its non-performance risk.
When available, the Group measures the fair value of an instrument using quoted price in an active market for that
instrument. A market is regarded as “active” if transactions of the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency
andvolume to provide pricing information on an on-going basis. The Group measures financial instruments quoted in
anactive market at a mid price.
If there is no quoted price in an active market, the Group uses valuation techniques that maximise the use of relevant
observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable inputs. The chosen valuation technique incorporates all of the
factors that market participants would take into account in pricing a transaction. Please refer to Note 22.
The Group recognises transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy as at the end of the reporting period during
which the change has occurred. If in the case of any investment the Directors at any time consider that the above basis
ofvaluation is inappropriate or that the value determined in accordance with the foregoing principles is unfair, they are
entitled to substitute what in their opinion, is a fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the
financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are included in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income in the period in which they arise.
Debt and Equity Instruments
Debt and equity instruments issued by a group entity are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with
the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument. An equity
instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities.
Equity instruments are recorded at the proceeds received less any direct costs of issue.
Derecognition
Sales of all financial assets are recognised on trade date – the date on which the Group disposes of the economic benefits
of the asset. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired or the
Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
On derecognition of a financial asset, the difference between the carrying amount of the asset (or the carrying amount
allocated to the portion of the asset derecognised) and the consideration received (including any new asset obtained less
any new liability assumed) is recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. Any interest in such
transferred financial assets that is created or retained by the Company is recognised as a separate asset or liability.
The Group derecognises a financial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expire.
Derivative financial instruments
The Group enters into foreign exchange forward contracts in order to manage its exposure to foreign exchange rate
movements. Further details can be found in Note 22.
Forward contracts are initially recognised at fair value at the date the contract is entered into and are subsequently
remeasured to their fair value at each balance sheet date. Resulting gains/losses are recognised in profit or loss
immediately. Forward contracts with positive fair value are recognised as financial assets whereas forward contracts with
negative fair value are recognised as financial liabilities. Contracts are presented as non-current assets or liabilities if the
remaining maturity of the instrument is more than 12 months and is not expected to be settled within 12 months. Other
contracts are presented as current assets.
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
42 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Expected credit losses
Credit risk is assessed at initial recognition of each financial asset and subsequently re-assessed at each reporting
period-end. For each category of Credit risk loans have been categorized into Stage 1, Stage 2 and Stage 3 with Stage 1
being to recognise 12 month Expected Credit Losses (ECL), Stage 2 being to recognise Lifetime ECL not credit impaired
and Stage 3 being to recognise Lifetime ECL credit impaired. When for example LTV exceeds 65% or amounts become
30days past due judgement will be used to reassess whether Credit risk has increased significantly enough to move the
loan from one stage to another. A loan is considered to be in default when there is a failure to meet the legal obligation
ofthe loan agreement. This would include provisions against loans that are considered by management as unlikely to pay
their obligations in full without realisation of collateral. Refer to Note 22 for further details.
Sancus loans and loan equivalents are assessed for credit risk based on information available at initial recognition,
predominantly (but not solely) using Loan to Value (LTV). For trade and other receivables, the Group has applied the
simplified approach to recognise lifetime expected credit losses although loan interest receivable is included in the gross
carrying value when determining ECL.
Provision for ECL is calculated using the credit risk, the probability of default and the probability of loss given default,
allunderpinned by the LTV, historical position, forward looking considerations and on occasion subsequent events,
andthe subjective judgement of the Board. ECL assumes the life of the loan is consistent with contractual term.
Financial guarantee contracts
Financial guarantee contracts are only recognised as a financial liability when it becomes probable that the guarantee will
be called upon in the future. The liability is measured at fair value and subsequently in accordance with the expected credit
loss model under IFRS 9. The fair value of financial guarantees is determined based on the present value of the difference in
cash flows between contracted payments required under the debt instrument and the payments that would be required
without the guarantee, or the estimated amount that would be payable to a third party for assuming the obligations.
(g) Foreign currency translation
Functional and presentation currency
The financial statements of the Group are presented in the currency of the primary economic environment in which
theCompany operates (its functional currency). The Directors have considered the primary economic currency of the
Company and considered the currency in which finance is raised, distributions made, and ultimately what currency would
be returned if the Company was wound up. The Directors have also considered the currency to which the underlying
investments are exposed. On balance, the Directors believe Sterling best represents the functional currency of the
Company. Therefore, the books and records are maintained in Sterling and for the purpose of the financial statements, the
results and financial position of the Group are presented in Sterling, which is also the presentation currency of the Group.
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates
of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the
translation at year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised
in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. Non-monetary items measured at historical cost are translated
using the exchange rates at the date of the transaction (not retranslated). Non-monetary items measured at fair value are
translated using the exchange rates at the date when fair value was determined.
All subsidiaries are presented in Sterling, which is the primary currency in which they operate with the exception of
Sancus Lending (Ireland) Limited whose primary currency is the Euro. Translation differences on non-monetary items are
reported as part of the fair value gain or loss reported in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Foreign exchange differences arising on consolidation of the Group’s foreign operations are taken direct to reserves.
Therates of exchange as at the year-end are £1: USD1.3527 (31 December 2020 USD1.3664) and £1: EUR1.1898
(31December 2020 EUR1.1202)
(h) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from a business combination that are not individually identified
and separately recognised. Goodwill is measured as the excess of (a) the aggregate of: (i) the consideration transferred
measured in accordance with IFRS 3, which generally requires acquisition-date fair value; (ii) the amount of any non-
controlling interest in the acquiree measured in accordance with IFRS 3; and (iii) in a business combination achieved in
stages, the acquisition-date fair value of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree; over (b) the net of
the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed measured in accordance with
IFRS 3. Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Refer to Note 2(k) for a description of impairment
testing procedures and Note 12 for details on impairment testing.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
43
Sancus Annual Report 2021
2.ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
(i) Interest costs
Interest costs are recognised when economic benefits are due to debt holders. Interest costs are accrued on a time basis,
by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly
discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability to the liability’s net carrying
amount on initial recognition.
(j) Other intangible assets
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortised to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful
lives. Useful lives and amortisation methods are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period, or more frequently
when there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired, with the effect of any changes accounted for on a
prospective basis. Amortisation commences when the intangible asset is available for use. The residual value of intangible
assets is assumed to be zero.
Computer software
Costs associated with maintaining computer software programmes are recognised as an expense as incurred.
Development costs that are directly attributable to the design and testing of identifiable and unique software products
controlled by the Group are recognised as intangible assets when the following criteria are met:
>
it is technically feasible to complete the software product so that it will be available of use;
>
management intends to complete the software product and use or sell it;
>
there is an ability to use or sell the software product;
>
it can be demonstrated how the software product will generate probable future economic benefits;
>
adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the software product
are available; and
>
the expenditure attributable to the software product during its development can be reliably measured.
Directly attributable costs that are capitalised as part of the software product include the software development
employee costs and third party contractor costs. Other development expenditures that do not meet these criteria are
recognised as an expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognised as an expense are not recognised as an
asset in a subsequent period. Capitalised development costs are recorded as intangible assets and amortised from the
point at which the asset is ready for use over their estimated useful lives, which does not exceed four years.
(k) Impairment testing of goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment
An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s or cash-generating unit’s carrying amount
exceedsits recoverable amount, which is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value-in-use. To determine
thevalue-in-use, management estimates expected future cash flows from each cash-generating unit and determines a
suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value of those cash flows. The data used for impairment testing
procedures are directly linked to the Group’s latest approved budget, adjusted as necessary to exclude the effects of
future reorganisations and asset enhancements. Discount factors are determined individually for each cash-generating
unit and reflect management’s assessment of respective risk profiles, such as market and asset-specific risk factors.
Impairment losses for cash-generating units reduce first the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to that cash-generating
unit. Any remaining impairment loss is charged pro rata to the other assets in the cash-generating unit. With the exception of
goodwill, all assets are subsequently reassessed for indications that an impairment loss previously recognised may no longer
exist. An impairment loss is reversed if the asset’s or cash-generating unit’s recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount.
All impairments or subsequent reversals of impairments are recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income.
(l) Investment in Joint Venture and associates
A joint venture is a joint arrangement over which the Group has joint control. An associate is an entity over which the
Group has significant influence but is not a subsidiary.
An investment in a joint venture or associate is accounted for by the Group using the equity method except for certain
FinTech Ventures associates as described in Note 3. These are measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance
with policy Note 2(f).
Any goodwill or fair value adjustment attributable to the Group’s share in the joint venture or associate is not recognised
separately and is included in the amount recognised as an investment.
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
44 Sancus Annual Report 2021
The carrying amount of the investment in a joint venture or associate is increased or decreased to recognise the Group’s
share of the profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the joint venture or associate and adjusted where
necessary to ensure consistency with the accounting policies of the Group.
Unrealised gains and losses on transactions between the Group and its joint venture or associate are eliminated to the extent
of the Group’s interest in the entity. Where unrealised losses are eliminated, the underlying asset is also tested for impairment.
(m) Non-Current Liabilities
Loans payable are recognised initially at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial
recognition, loans payable are stated at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
The ZDPs are contractually required to be redeemed on their maturity date and they will be settled in cash, thus, ZDP
shares are classified as liabilities (refer to Note 17) in accordance with IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation. After
initial recognition, these liabilities are measured at amortised cost, which represents the initial proceeds of the issuance
plus the accrued entitlement to the reporting date. Any ZDPs acquired by the group, as noted in Note 17, are held in
Treasury and shown as a reduction in carrying value.
(n) Property and equipment
Tangible fixed assets include computer equipment, furniture and fittings stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is provided at rates calculated to write off the cost of tangible property and computer equipment on
astraight-line basis over its expected useful economic life as follows:
Furniture and fittings 3 to 5 years
Computer equipment 2 to 4 years
(o) Revenue recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and represents amounts receivable for
services provided in the normal course of business, net of discounts, VAT and other sales-related taxes where applicable
in the Group. Revenue is reduced for estimated rebates and other similar allowances. The Group has five principal sources
of revenue and related accounting policies are outlined below:
Interest on loans
Interest income is recognised in accordance with IFRS 9. Interest income is accrued over the contractual life of the loan,
by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly
discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that asset’s net carrying
amount on initial recognition.
Dividend income
Dividend income from investments is recognised when the shareholders’ rights to receive payment have been established
(provided that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group and the amount of revenue can be
measured reliably).
Fee income on syndicated and non-syndicated loans
In accordance with the guidance in IFRS 15 Revenue, the Group distinguishes between fees that are an integral part of the
effective interest rate of a financial instrument, fees that are earned as services are provided, and fees that are earned on
the execution of a significant act.
Commitment and arrangement fees
Commitment and arrangement fees earned for syndicated loans are recognised on origination of the loan as
compensation for the service of syndication. This is a reflection of the commercial reality of the operations of the business
to arrange and administer loans for other parties i.e. the execution of a significant act and satisfying the Group’s
performance obligation at the point of arranging the loan.
Consistent with the policy outlined above, commitment and arrangement fees earned on loans originated for the sole
benefit of the Group are also recorded in revenue on completion of the service of analysing or originating the loan. Whilst
this is not in accordance with the requirements of the effective interest rate method outlined in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments,
this is not considered to have a material impact on the financial performance or financial position of the Group.
Exit fees
Where a loan is syndicated and has standard terms the exit fee is recognised as part of the arrangement fee, reflecting
the costs of syndication at the start of the loan. Where a loan is syndicated and has milestones or conditions which
determine if the fee becomes payable and/or the magnitude of the fee the exit fee is treated as variable consideration in
line with IFRS 15 and is only recognised when the relevant milestones/conditions are met. Where loans are not syndicated
the exit fee is deemed to be part of the effective interest rate and recognised over the term of the loan.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
45
Sancus Annual Report 2021
2.ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
(o) Revenue recognition continued
Fee income earned by peer-to-peer subsidiary platforms
Fee income earned by subsidiaries whose principal business is to operate online lending platforms that arrange financing
between Co-Funders and Borrowers includes arrangement fees, trading transaction fees, repayment fees and other lender
related fees. Revenue earned from the arrangement of financing is classified as a transaction fee and is recognised
immediately upon acceptance of the arrangement by borrowers. Other transaction fees, including revenue from Co-Funders
in relation to the sale of their loan participations in platform secondary markets is also recognised immediately. Loan
repayment fees are charged on a straight-line basis over the repayments of the borrower’s financing arrangement.
Advisory fees
Advisory fee income is invoiced and recognised on an accruals basis in accordance with the relevant investment
advisoryagreement.
(p) Share based payments
As explained in the Remuneration Report, the Company provides a discretionary bonus, part of which is satisfied through the
issuance of the Company’s own shares, to certain senior management. The cost of such bonuses is taken to the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income with a corresponding credit to Shareholders’ Equity. The fair value of any share options
granted is determined at the grant date and the expense is spread over the vesting period in accordance with IFRS 2.
(q) Taxation
Current tax, including corporation tax in relevant jurisdictions that the Group operates in, is provided at amounts expected to be
paid (or recovered) using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of all timing differences that have originated but not reversed at the balance sheet
date where transactions or events that result in an obligation to pay more tax in the future or a right to pay less tax in the
future have occurred at the balance sheet date. Timing differences are differences between the Group’s taxable profits,
and its results as stated in the financial statements, that arise from the inclusion of gains and losses in tax assessments in
periods different from those in which they are recognised in the financial statements.
(r) Treasury shares
Where the Company purchases its own Share Capital, the consideration paid, which includes any directly attributable
costs, is recognised as a deduction from Share Premium.
When such shares are subsequently sold or reissued to the market, any consideration received, net of any directly
attributable incremental transaction costs, is recognised as an increase in Share Premium. Where the Company cancels
treasury shares, no further action is required to the Share Premium account at the time of cancellation.
(s) Warrants
Warrants are accounted for as either equity or liabilities based upon the characteristics and provisions of each instrument
and are recorded at fair value as of the date of issuance. In subsequent periods an amount representing the difference
between the warrant exercise price and the prevailing market price of the company’s shares is transferred from/to
retained earnings to/from warrants outstanding.
(t) Inventories – Development properties
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost comprises initial outlay and, where applicable,
additional costs that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Net realisable
value represents the estimated selling price less all estimated costs of completion and costs to be incurred in marketing
and selling. Repossessed assets are accounted for under IAS 2: Inventories because the Group will either immediately
seek to dispose of those assets which are readily marketable or pursue the original development plans to sell for those
that are not readily marketable. Such assets are classed as “Other Assets” within current assets on the balance sheet.
(u) Leases
The Group assesses whether a contract is or contains a lease, at inception of the contract. The Group recognises a
right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability with respect to all lease arrangements in which it is the lessee,
except for short-term leases (defined as leases with a lease term of 12 months or less) and leases of low value assets. For
these leases, the Group recognises the lease payments as an operating expense on a straight-line basis over the term of
the lease unless another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the
leased assets are consumed.
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement
date, discounted by using the incremental borrowing rate.
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
46 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise fixed lease payments (including in-substance fixed
payments) less any lease incentives receivable, variable lease payments that depend on an index or rate (initially measured using
the index or rate at the commencement date), the amount expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees,
the exercise price of purchase options (if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise the options) and payments of penalties for
terminating the lease if the lease term reflects the exercise of an option to terminate the lease.
The lease liability is presented within current and non-current liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position.
It is subsequently measured by increasing the carrying amount to reflect interest on the lease liability (using the effective
interest method) and by reducing the carrying amount to reflect the lease payments made. The Group remeasures this
liability (and makes a corresponding adjustment to the related right-of-use asset) whenever the lease term has changed
or there is a change in the lease payments used on inception to measure the liability as described above.
The right-of-use assets comprise the initial measurement of the corresponding lease liability, lease payments made at
orbefore the commencement day, less any lease incentives received and any initial direct costs. They are subsequently
measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
Right-of-use assets are depreciated over the shorter period of lease term and useful life of the underlying asset. If
aleasetransfers ownership of the underlying asset or the cost of the right-of-use asset reflects that the Group expects
toexercise a purchase option, the related right-of-use asset is depreciated over the useful life of the underlying asset.
Thedepreciation starts at the commencement date of the lease.
The Group applies IAS 36 to determine whether a right-of-use asset is impaired and accounts for any identified
impairment loss as described in the ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ policy.
Variable rents that do not depend on an index or rate are not included in the measurement of the lease liability and the
right-of-use asset. The related payments are recognised as an expense in the period in which the event or condition that
triggers those payments occurs and are included in ‘Operating expenses’ in profit or loss.
(v) Adoption of new and revised Standards
Amendments to IFRSs and IASs that are mandatorily effective for the current year
In the current year, the Group has applied a number of amendments to IFRSs and IASs issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) that are mandatorily effective for an accounting period that begins on or after
1January 2021. These have been listed below. Their adoption has not had any material impact on the disclosures or
ontheamounts reported in these financial statements.
>
Amendments to IFRS 4, 7, 9, 16 and IAS 39: Amendments regarding replacement issues in the context of the IBOR reform
IFRSs, IASs and amendments that are in issue but not yet effective
At the date of approval of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the following IFRSs, IASs and amendments, which
have not been applied in these Consolidated Financial Statements and are not envisaged to have a material impact on
thefinancial statements when they are applied, were in issue but not yet effective:
>
Amendments to IFRS 1: Amendments resulting from ‘Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018-2020’
>
Amendments to IFRS 3: Amendments updating a reference to the Conceptual Framework
>
Amendments to IFRS 4: Amendments regarding the expiry date of the deferral approach
>
Amendments to IFRS 9: Amendments resulting from ‘Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018-2020’
>
Amendments to IFRS 16: Amendments to extend the exemption from assessing whether a Covid-19-related rent
concession is a lease modification
>
IFRS 17: Insurance Contracts
>
Amendments to IFRS 17: Amendments to address concerns and implementation challenges that were identified
afterIFRS 17 was published
>
Amendments to IFRS 17: Amendments regarding the initial application of IFRS 17 and IFRS 9
>
Amendments to IAS 1: Amendments regarding the classification of liabilities
>
Amendments to IAS 1: Amendments to defer the effective date of the January 2020 amendments
>
Amendments to IAS 1: Amendments regarding the disclosure of Accounting Policies
>
Amendments to IAS 8: Amendments regarding the definition of accounting estimates
>
Amendments to IAS 12: Amendments regarding deferred tax on leases and decommissioning obligations
>
Amendments to IAS 16: Amendments prohibiting a company from deducting from the cost of property, plant and
equipment amounts received from selling items produced while the company is preparing the asset for its intended use
>
Amendments to IAS 37: Amendments regarding the costs to include when assessing whether a contract is onerous
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
47
Sancus Annual Report 2021
3. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS IN APPLYING ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In the application of the Group’s accounting policies, which are described in Note 2, the directors are required to make
judgements (other than those involving estimations) that have a significant impact on the amounts recognised and to
make estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources.
The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to
berelevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates. There is no change in applying accounting policies for critical
accounting estimates and judgments from the prior year. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on
anongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the
revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current
andfuture periods.
Critical judgements in applying the group’s accounting policies
The following are the critical judgements, apart from those involving estimations (which are dealt with separately below),
that the directors have made in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies and that have the most significant
effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.
Fair value accounting for FinTech Ventures investments
Some of the Group’s FinTech Ventures investments meet the definition of an associate. However, the Group has applied
the exemption available under IAS 28.18 which states that when an investment in an associate is held by, or is held
indirectly through, an entity that is a venture capital organisation, the entity may elect to measure investments in those
associates at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IAS 39 – Financial Instruments.
The Directors consider that the Group is of a nature similar to a venture capital organisation on the basis that FinTech
Ventures investments form part of a portfolio which is monitored and managed without distinguishing between
investments that qualify as associate undertakings. Furthermore, the most appropriate point in time for exit from such
investments is being actively monitored as part of the Group’s investment strategy.
The Group therefore designates those investments in associates which qualify for this exemption as fair value through
profit or loss. Refer to Note 22 for fair value techniques used. If the Group had not applied this exemption the investments
would be accounted for using the equity method of accounting. This would have the impact of taking a share of each
investment’s profit or loss for the year and would also affect the carrying value of the investments.
The Directors consider that equity and loan stock share the same investment characteristics and risks and they are
therefore treated as a single unit of account for valuation purposes and a single class for disclosure purposes.
Exit fees
The Directors consider that the economic measurement of fee revenues that arise and become due on the completion
ofa loan (exit fees and warrants) should be accounted for as variable consideration and the exit fee constrained to the
extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognised will not occur.
Variable consideration is included based on the expected value or most likely amount, with the estimated transaction
price associated with syndication services (being the performance obligation to which these fees are attributable) due
oncollection of the loan, updated at the end of each reporting period to represent the circumstances present and any
changes in circumstances during the reporting period. This includes factors such as timing risk, liquidity risk, quantum
uncertainty and conditions precedent in the syndicated finance contract. The Directors consider that this treatment best
reflects the commercial operations of the Group as an administrator of loan arrangements.
IFRS 10 Control Judgements
Judgement is sometimes required to determine whether after considering all relevant factors, the Group has control,
jointcontrol or significant influence over an entity or arrangement. Other companies may make different judgements
regarding the same entity or arrangement. The Directors have assessed whether or not the Group has control over
Sancus Loan Note 7 based on whether the Group has the practical ability to direct the relevant activities unilaterally.
Inmaking their judgement, the directors considered the rights associated with its investment in preference shares.
Afterassessment, the directors concluded that the Group does not have the ability to affect returns through voting
rights(the preference shares do not have voting rights) or other arrangements such as direct management of these
entities (the Group does not have control over the investment manager). If the Directors had concluded that the
ownership of preference shares was sufficient to give the Group control, these entities would instead have been
consolidated with the results of the Group.
IFRS 9 Credit Risk
Credit risk and determining when a significant increase in credit risk has occurred are critical accounting judgements and
are assessed at each reporting period end. Credit risk is used to calculate estimated credit losses (ECL). Further details on
credit risk can be found in Note 22.
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
48 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
The key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting period, that
may have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the
next financial year, are discussed below.
Impairment of goodwill
As detailed in Note 12, the Directors carry out an impairment review annually to assess whether goodwill is impaired.
Indoing so, the Directors assess the value in use of each cash generating unit through an internal discounted cash flow
analysis. The last impairment review was carried out for the June 2021 interim reporting.
Given the nature of the Group’s operations, the calculation of value in use is sensitive to the estimation of future cash
flows and the discount rates applied, the impact of which is also disclosed in Note 12. Refer Notes 2(h) and 2(k) for
accounting policies relating to the valuation and impairment of goodwill.
IFRS 9 ECL
Key areas of estimation and uncertainty are the probabilities of default (PD) and the probabilities of loss given default
(PL) which are used along with the credit risk in the calculation of ECL. Further details on ECLs, PD and PL can be found
in Note 22. Should the estimates of PD or PL prove to be different from what actually happens in the future, then the
recoverability of loans could be higher or lower than the accounts currently suggest, although this should be mitigated
bythe levels of LTV which are, in the main, less than 70%. Where loans are in default and classified within stage 3, the
Directors estimate of the present value of amounts recoverable through enforcement or other repayment plans could be
materially different to the actual proceeds received to settle the balances due. In respect of certain loans held by the
Group, the range of outcomes is significant and has a material impact on the calculation of ECL.
Fair Value of the FinTech Ventures investments
The Group invests in financial instruments which are not quoted in active markets and measures their fair values as
detailed in Note 22.
All of the FinTech Ventures investments are categorised as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. In the past the Directors
have estimated the fair value of financial instruments using discounted cash flow methodology, comparable market
transactions, recent capital raises and other transactional data including the performance of the respective businesses.
Having considered the terms, rights and characteristics of the equity and loan stock held by the Group in the FinTech
Ventures investments, as well as the challenges that have faced the platforms during the pandemic, the Board’s estimate
of liquidation value of these assets is £0.5m at 31 December 2021 (31 December 2020: £Nil) following £0.5m deployed
into an existing investment in March 2021. Changes in the performance of these businesses and access to future returns
via its current holdings could affect the amounts ultimately realised on the disposal of these investments, which may be
greater or less than £0.5m. There have been no transfers between levels in the period (2020: None).
4. SEGMENTAL REPORTING
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the manner in which the Executive Management Team
reports to the Board, which is regarded to be the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) as defined under IFRS 8.
Themain focus of the Group is Sancus. Bearing this in mind the Executive Management Team have identified 4 segments
based on operations and geography.
Finance costs and Head Office costs are not allocated to segments as such costs are driven by central teams who
provide, amongst other services, finance, treasury, secretarial and other administrative functions based on need. The
Group’s borrowings are not allocated to segments as these are managed by the Central team. Segment assets and
liabilities are measured in the same way as in these financial statements and are allocated to segments based on the
operations of the segment and the physical location of those assets and liabilities.
The four segments based on geography, whose operations are identical (within reason), are listed below. Note that
Sancus Loans Limited, although based in the UK, is reported separately as a stand-alone entity to the Board and as
suchis considered to be a segment in its own right.
1. Offshore
Contains the operations of Sancus Lending (Jersey) Limited, Sancus Lending (Guernsey) Limited, Sancus Lending
(Gibraltar) Limited, Sancus Properties Limited and Sancus Group Holdings Limited.
2. United Kingdom (UK)
Contains the operations of Sancus Lending (UK) Limited and Sancus Holdings (UK) Limited.
3. Ireland
Contains the operations of Sancus Lending (Ireland) Limited.
4. Sancus Loans Limited
Contains the operations of Sancus Loans Limited.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
49
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
4. SEGMENTAL REPORTING continued
Reconciliation to FinancialStatements
Year to 31 December
2021
Offshore
£’000
UK
£’000
Ireland
£’000
Sancus
Loans
Limited
(SLL)
£’000
Sancus
Debt
Costs
£’000
Total
Sancus
£’000
Head
Office
£’000
SLL Debt
Costs
£’000
Fintech
Ventures
Fair Value
& Forex
£’000
Other
£’000
Financial
Statements
£’000
Revenue 3,810 1,480 667 (1,149) - 4,808 - 4,137 - 77 9,022
Operating Profit/(loss)* 1,207 (462) 88 (1,170) - (337) (1,601) - - 67 (1,871)
Credit Losses (3,892) - - (2,579) - (6,471) - - - (18) (6,489)
Debt Costs - - - - (1,875) (1,875) - - - - (1,875)
Other Gains/(losses) 56 2 (38) (100) - (80) - - 420 10 350
Loss on JVs and
associates
- - - - - - - - - (473) (473)
Taxation 19 - - - - 19 - - - - 19
(Loss)/Profit After Tax (2,610) (460) 50 (3,849) (1,875) (8,744) (1,601) - 420 (414) (10,339)
Year to 31 December
2020
Revenue 4,338 638 628 876 - 6,480 - 3,785 - 596 10,861
Operating Profit/(loss)* 1,916 (672) 201 859 - 2,304 (890) - - (302) 1,112
Credit Losses (3,923) - - (965) - (4,888) - - - 223 (4,665)
Debt Costs - - - - (1,952) (1,952) - - - - (1,952)
Other Gains/(losses) 4 - - - - 4 - - (6,022) (1,072) (7,090)
Loss on JVs and
associates
- - - - - - - - - (1,937) (1,937)
Taxation 15 - - - - 15 - - - - 15
(Loss)/Profit After Tax (1,988) (672) 201 (106) (1,952) (4,517) (890) - (6,022) (3,088) (14,517)
*Operating Profit/(loss) before credit losses and debt costs
Sancus Loans Limited is consolidated into the Group’s results as it is 100% owned by Sancus Group. However, the reality
isthat Sancus Loans Limited is a Co-Funder the same as any other Co-Funder. As a result the Board reviews the
economic performance of Sancus Loans Limited in the same way as any other Co-Funder, with revenue being stated
netof debt costs. Operating expenses include recharges from UK to Offshore £635,000, Offshore to Ireland £114,000,
HeadOffice to Offshore £130,000 and Offshore to Head Office £55,000. “Other” includes Fintech (excluding fair
valueand forex) and Sancus Group Holdings operations.
50 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Reconciliation to Financial Statements
At 31 December
2021
Offshore
£’000
UK
£’000
Ireland
£’000
Sancus
Loans
Limited
(SLL)
£’000
Total
Sancus
£’000
Head
Office
£’000
Investment
in IOM
£’000
Fintech
Portfolio
£’000
Other
£’000
Inter
Company
Balances
£’000
Financial
Statements
£’000
Total Assets 45,397 11,127 586 60,504 117,614 43,129 500 500 793 (65,577) 96,959
Total Liabilities (40,503) (12,599) (714) (64,355) (118,171) (23,978) - - (1,293) 65,577 (77,865)
Net Assets/
(liabilities)
4,894 (1,472) (128) (3,851) (557) 19,151 500 500 (500) - 19,094
At 31 December
2020
Total Assets 44,486 7,203 488 54,131 106,308 47,137 866 - 4,177 (55,549) 102,939
Total Liabilities (38,720) (8,214) (679) (53,255) (100,868) (27,774) - - (352) 55,549 (73,445)
Net Assets/
(liabilities)
5,766 (1,011) (191) 876 5,440 19,363 866 - 3,825 - 29,494
Head Office liabilities include borrowings £23,007,000 (2020: £24,897,000). Other Fintech assets and liabilities,
andSancus Group Holdings assets and liabilities are included within “Other”.
5. REVENUE
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Co-Funder fees 1,574 1,836
Earn out (exit) fees 962 1,863
Advisory fees - 399
Transaction fees 2,862 1,434
Total revenue from contracts with customers 5,398 5,532
Interest on loans 168 456
HIT Interest income 2,989 4,660
Sundry income 467 213
Total Revenue 9,022 10,861
The disaggregation of revenue reflects the different performance obligations in contracts with customers as described in
the accounting policy Note 2(o) and the typical timing of payment for those relevant revenue streams.
6. COST OF SALES
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Interest costs 1,911 2,016
HIT interest costs 4,137 3,785
Other cost of sales 489 317
Total cost of sales 6,537 6,118
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
51
Sancus Annual Report 2021
7. OPERATING EXPENSES
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Amortisation and depreciation 356 428
Audit fees 155 231
Company secretarial 124 78
Corporate insurance 96 72
Employment costs 4,363 3,573
Investor relations expenses 81 67
Legal & professional 251 222
Marketing expenses 93 38
NOMAD fees 76 75
Other office and administration costs 514 620
Pension costs 87 145
Registrar fees 31 23
Sundry 4 10
Total operating expenses 6,231 5,582
8. OTHER NET LOSSES
The £557,000 Other net losses is predominantly made up of losses on Foreign exchange £143,000 and loss on joint
ventures and associates of £473,000 offset by the profit on the sale of Sancus Property Limited properties of £59,000.
(2020 £3,032,000: predominantly made up of the write down of other assets of £892,000 (Note 14) and loss on joint
ventures and associates of £1,937,000 (Note 9).
9. INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURES
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
At beginning of year 866 2,703
Additions 107 100
Share of profit/(loss) of associate 161 (574)
Share of loss in joint venture (91) (100)
Write down joint venture/associate (543) (1,263)
At end of year 500 866
The investment in joint venture relates to a 50% share in Amberton Limited (31 December 2020: 50% share in Amberton
Asset Management Limited). Both investments were held at £Nil. Amberton Asset Management Limited was liquidated on
13 December 2021. Amberton Limited, which is Jersey a registered entity, was incorporated in January 2021 and has been
established as a joint venture to manage the loan note programme going forward (duties previously performed by
Amberton Asset Management Limited).
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
52 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Details of material associates
Proportion of ownership
interest/voting rights held
bythe group
Principal Activity
Place of
Incorporation
31 December
2021
31 December
2020
Sancus (Isle of Man) Holdings Limited Holding Company for Sancus (IOM) Limited Guernsey 29.32% 29.32%
The above associate is accounted for using the equity method in these consolidated financial statements as set out in the
Group’s accounting policies in Note 2.
Summarised financial information in respect of Sancus (Isle of Man) Holdings is set out below. The summarised financial
information represents amounts in associates’ financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRSs.
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Non-current assets 1 2
Current assets 5,309 4,821
Current liabilities (49) (164)
Equity attributable to owners of the company 5,261 4,659
Revenue 173 278
Profit from continuing operations 133 250
Reconciliation of the above summarised financial information to the carrying amount of the interest in Sancus (Isle of Man)
Holdings Limited recognised in the consolidated financial statements:
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Net assets of associate 5,261 4,659
Proportion of the Group’s ownership interest in the associate 1,543 1,366
Goodwill arising on acquisition 763 763
Write down of carrying value (1,806) (1,263)
Carrying amount of the Group’s interest in the associate 500 866
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
53
Sancus Annual Report 2021
10. LOSS PER ORDINARY SHARE
Consolidated loss per Ordinary Share has been calculated by dividing the consolidated loss for the year after tax
attributable to Ordinary Shareholders of £10,339,000 (31 December 2020: loss of £14,517,000) by the weighted
averagenumber of Ordinary Shares (excluding treasury shares) outstanding during the period of 478,141,413
(31December 2020: 315,797,259).
Note 16 describes the warrants in issue. Taking these warrants into account the weighted average number of Ordinary
Shares used in calculating the diluted loss per share was 493,540,868 (31 December 2020: 346,046,187).
31 December
2021
31 December
2020
Number of shares 489,843,477 489,843,477
Weighted average no. of shares in issue throughout the year 478,141,413 315,797,259
Basic Loss per share (2.16)p (4.60)p
Diluted Loss per share (2.09)p (4.19)p
11. FIXED ASSETS
Cost
Right-of-use
assets
£’000
Property &
Equipment
£’000
Total
£’000
At 31 December 2019 1,089 433 1,522
Additions in the year - 29 29
Leases expired (75) - (75)
Lease variations 253 - 253
At 31 December 2020 1,267 462 1,729
Additions in the year 128 15 143
Disposals - (14) (14)
Leases expired (132) - (132)
Lease variations (16) - (16)
At 31 December 2021 1,247 463 1,710
Accumulated depreciation
Right-of-use
assets
£’000
Property &
Equipment
£’000
Total
£’000
At 31 December 2019 231 273 504
Charge in the year 208 54 262
Leases expired (75) - (75)
Lease variations 264 - 264
At 31 December 2020 628 327 955
Charge for the year 190 51 241
Disposals - (14) (14)
Leases expired (132) - (132)
At 31 December 2021 686 364 1,050
Net book value 31 December 2021 561 99 660
Net book value 31 December 2020 639 135 774
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
54 Sancus Annual Report 2021
12. GOODWILL
At 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2020 goodwill comprises: £’000
Sancus Lending Jersey 14,255
Sancus Lending Gibraltar 8,639
22,894
Impairment tests
The carrying amount of goodwill arising on the acquisition of certain subsidiaries is assessed by the Board for impairment
on an annual basis or sooner if there has been any indication of impairment. The Board last assessed the Goodwill for
impairment on the preparation of the 2021 interim accounts, with the next assessment due on the preparation of the 2022
interim accounts, assuming that there having been no indicators of impairment in the interim period.
The value in use of Sancus Jersey and Sancus Gibraltar was based on an internal Discounted Cash Flow (“DCF”) value-in-
use analysis using cash flow forecasts for the years 2021/22 to 2025/26. The starting point for each of the cash flows was
the revised forecast for 2021 produced by Sancus Lending Jersey and Gibraltar management. Management’s revenue
forecasts applied a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) to revenue of 16.1% and 19.6% for Jersey and Gibraltar
respectively. A cost of equity discount rate of 11.5% was employed in the valuation model for Sancus Jersey and 12.0% for
Sancus Gibraltar. The resultant valuation indicated that no impairment of goodwill was required in either Sancus Lending
Jersey or Sancus Lending Gibraltar, with significant headroom.
Goodwill valuation sensitivities
When the discounted cash flow valuation methodology is utilised as the primary goodwill impairment test, the variables
which influence the results most significantly are the discount rates applied to the future cash flows and the revenue
forecasts. The table below shows the impact on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income of stress testing
the period end goodwill valuation with a decrease in revenues of 10% and an increase in cost of equity discount rate of
3%. These potential changes in key assumptions fall within historic variations experienced by the business (taking other
factors into account) and are therefore deemed reasonable. The current model reveals that a sustained decrease in
revenue of circa 20% for Jersey and circa 28% for Gibraltar or a sustained increase of circa 11% in the cost of Equity
discount rate for Jersey and circa 14% for Gibraltar would remove the headroom.
Reduction in headroom implied
bysensitivity
Sensitivity applied
Sancus
Jersey
£’000
Sancus
Gibraltar
£’000
Total
£’000
10% decrease in revenue per annum 5,650 3,063 8,713
3% increase in cost of equity discount rate 4,040 2,679 6,719
Neither a 10% decrease in revenue nor a 3% increase in the cost of Equity discount rate implies a reduction of Goodwill
inJersey or Gibraltar.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
55
Sancus Annual Report 2021
13. OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Cost £’000
At 31 December 2021, 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019 1,584
Amortisation £’000
At 31 December 2019 1,250
Charge for the year 166
At 31 December 2020 1,416
Charge for the year 115
At 31 December 2021 1,531
Net book value 31 December 2021 53
Net book value 31 December 2020 168
Other Intangible assets comprise capitalised contractors’ costs and other costs related to core systems development.
Noimpairment provision has been recorded. The amortisation charge has been recorded in Operating expenses.
14. OTHER ASSETS
Development
properties
£’000
At 31 December 2019 3,336
Additions 236
Disposals (1,665)
Write downs (892)
At 31 December 2020 1,015
Additions 157
Disposals (676)
At 31 December 2021 496
Other assets comprise of a number of repossessed properties and developments which were previously held as security
against certain loans which have defaulted. The write down in the prior year is that necessary to bring the assets to the
lower of cost and net realisable value. The remaining £0.5m comprises of one development property which is held at cost.
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
56 Sancus Annual Report 2021
15. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Loan fees, interest and similar receivable 4,146 7,438
Receivable from associated companies 10 49
Taxation 40 -
Derivative contracts (Note 22) 759 94
Other trade receivables and prepaid expenses 1,120 623
Total trade and other receivables 6,075 8,204
Loan fees, interest and similar receivables amounted to £11,201,000 at 31 December 2021 (31 December 2020: £9,628,000)
before provisions against receivables of £7,055,000 (31 December 2020: £2,190,000).
16. SHARE CAPITAL, SHARE PREMIUM & DISTRIBUTABLE RESERVE
Sancus has the power under its articles of association to issue an unlimited number of Ordinary Shares of no par value.
No Ordinary shares were issued during the year. (2020: 177,777,778 Ordinary shares for a consideration of £4,000,000).
Share Capital
Number of shares
Ordinary shares of nil par value
31 December
2021
31 December
2020
At beginning of the year 489,843,477 312,065,699
Issued during the year - 177,777,778
At end of the year 489,843,477 489,843,477
Share Premium
Ordinary shares of nil par value
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
At beginning of the year 116,218 112,557
Issued during the year - 4,000
Costs of issue - (339)
At end of the year 116,218 116,218
Ordinary shareholders have the right to attend and vote at Annual General Meetings and the right to any dividends
orother distributions which the company may make in relation to that class of share.
Treasury Shares
Number of shares
31 December
2021
31 December
2020
At beginning of the year 7,925,999 7,925,999
Sancus shares acquired on sale of BMS Finance AB Limited 3,926,677 -
At end of the year 11,852,676 7,925,999
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
At beginning of the year 1,099 1,099
Sancus shares acquired on sale of BMS Finance AB Limited 73 -
At end of the year 1,172 1,099
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
57
Sancus Annual Report 2021
16. SHARE CAPITAL, SHARE PREMIUM & DISTRIBUTABLE RESERVE continued
Warrants in Issue
On 22 December 2020, in connection with the issue of the New Bonds, the Company issued 153,994,543 Warrants to
subscribe in cash for new Ordinary Shares at a subscription price of2.25 penceper Ordinary Share. The Warrants will
beexercisable on at least 30 days notice in the period to 31 December 2025.As at 31 December 2021 and up to the
dateof signing these accounts none of these warrants have been exercised. The warrants in issue are classified as
equityinstruments because a fixed amount of cash is exchangeable for a fixed amount of equity, there being no
otherfeatureswhich could justify a financial liability classification. The fair value of the warrants at 31 December 2021
is£385,000 (31 December 2020: £847,000).
17. LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
ZDP shares (1) - 12,424
Corporate Bond (2) 12,474 12,473
HIT Facility (3) 52,203 44,553
Lease creditors (Notes 2(u), 2(v) & 24) 364 469
Total non-current liabilities 65,041 69,919
Current liabilities
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
ZDP shares (1) 10,532 -
Accounts payable 93 436
Payable to associated companies 16 -
Interest payable 366 -
Accruals and other payables 1,519 1,202
Taxation 86 118
Deferred income - 40
Provisions for financial guarantees - 1,542
Lease creditors (Notes 2(u), 2(v) & 24) 212 188
Total current liabilities 12,824 3,526
Provisions for financial guarantees were recognised in the prior year in relation to ECLs on off-balance sheet loans and
debtors where the company has provided a subordinated position or other guarantee (Note 25). No such provision was
required in the current year. The fair value is determined using the exact same methodology as that used in determining
ECLs (Note 2(f) and Note 22). The amount credited to operating profit in the year was £1,542,000 (2020: £1,542,000
charged to operating profit), there being no other movements.
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
58 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Interest costs on debt facilities
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
ZDP shares (1) 969 1,246
Corporate Bond (2) 906 706
HIT Facility (3) 4,137 3,785
Lease Interest 36 64
Total interest costs on debt facilities 6,048 5,801
1. ZDP shares
The ZDP Shares have a maturity date of 5 December 2022 with a final capital entitlement of £1.6464 per ZDP Share.
Under the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 shares in the Company can only be redeemed if the Company can
satisfythe solvency test prescribed under that law. Refer to the Company’s Memorandum and Articles of
Incorporationfor full detail of the rights attached to the ZDP Shares. This document can be accessed via the Company’s
website www.sancus.com.
The ZDP shares bear interest at an average rate of 8% (2020: 8%). In accordance with article 7.5.5 of the Company’s
Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation, the Company may not incur more than £30m of long term debt without the
prior approval from the ZDP shareholders. The Memorandum and Articles also specify that two debt cover tests must be
met in relation to the ZDPs. At 31 December 2021 the Company was in compliance with these covenants as Cover Test A
was 3.07 (minimum of 1.7) and Cover Test B was 5.38 (minimum of 3.25). At 31 December 2021 senior debt borrowing
capacity amounted to £17.4m. The HIT facility does not impact on this capacity as it is non-recourse to Sancus.
In addition to a tender offer in April 2021, whereby the company acquired, and subsequently cancelled 1,690,034 ZDP
shares, the company purchased a further 226,718 ZDP shares throughout the year. At 31 December 2021 the Company
held 12,235,748 shares (31 December 2020: 12,009,030) with an aggregate value of £18,810,266 (31 December 2020:
£17,051,409).
2. Corporate Bond
£6,125,000 of the existing £10m bonds were repaid early on 21 December 2020 (maturity was 30 June 2021). The
remaining £3,875,000 were rolled into new bonds which were issued on 22 December 2020. In addition to these a further
£8,700,000 new bonds were issued for cash on 22 December 2020 giving a total amount of new bonds issued
£12,575,000 (£15m may be issued over the life of the bonds). The bonds bear interest at 7% (2020: 7%). The new bonds
have a maturity date of 31 December 2025.
3. HIT Facility
On 28 January 2018, Sancus signed a funding facility with Honeycomb Investment Trust plc (HIT). The funding line initially
had a term of 3 years and comprised of a £45m accordion and revolving credit facility. On 3 December 2020 this facility
was extended to a 6 year term to end on 28 January 2024. In addition to the extension the facility was increased to £75m.
The facility bears interest at 7.25%.
The HIT facility has portfolio performance covenants including that actual loss rates are not to exceed 4% in any twelve
month period and underperforming loans are not to exceed 10% of the portfolio. Sancus Group has a £5.8m first loss
position on the HIT facility. Sancus has also provided HIT with a guarantee, capped at £2m that will continue to ensure
theorderly wind down of the loan book, in the event of the insolvency of Sancus Group, given its position as facility and
security agent. Refer to Note 25 Commitments and Guarantees.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
59
Sancus Annual Report 2021
18. TAXATION
The Company is exempt from Guernsey taxation under the Income Tax (Exempt Bodies) (Guernsey) Ordinance, 1989.
Afixed annual fee of £1,200 (31 December 2020: £1,200) is payable to the States of Guernsey in respect of this exemption.
Reconciliation of tax charge
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Accounting loss before tax (10,358) (14,532)
Gibraltar Corporation Tax at 10% (2020: 10%) - -
Jersey Corporation Tax at 10% (2020: 10%) - -
Adjustment in respect of prior years (19) (15)
Tax credit (19) (15)
Certain of the Group’s subsidiaries have an estimated £16.0m of losses between them available to carry forward to offset
against qualifying future trading profits. The Group does not recognise deferred tax assets in respect of losses arising because
in the opinion of the directors the quantum and timing of any suitable profits which can utilise these losses is unknown.
19. NOTES TO THE CASH FLOW STATEMENT
Cash generated from operations (excluding loan movements)
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Loss for the year (10,339) (14,517)
Adjustments for:
Net losses on FinTech Ventures - 5,936
Other net losses/(gains) 9 (221)
ZDP finance costs 874 1,039
Fair Value joint ventures and associates 473 1,937
Changes in expected credit losses 6,489 4,665
Amortisation/depreciation of fixed assets 356 428
Amortisation of debt issue costs 202 201
SPL Properties (59) 960
Changes in working capital:
Trade and other receivables (1,995) (4,303)
Trade and other payables (131) 38
Cash outflow from operations (excluding loan movements) (4,121) (3,837)
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
60 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
The tables below detail changes in the Group’s liabilities arising from financing activities, including both cash and non-
cash changes. Liabilities arising from financing activities are those for which cash flows were, or future cash flows will
beclassified in the Group’s consolidated cash flow statement as cash flows from financing activities.
1 January
2021
£’000
Payments
£’000
Receipts
1
£’000
Debt
issue
costs
1
£’000
Additions
Non-cash
£’000
Amortisation
of debt issue
costs
Non-cash
£’000
Other
Non-
cash
£’000
31 December
2021
£’000
ZDP Shares 12,424 (2,756)
1
- - - 24 840
3
10,532
Corporate Bond 12,473 (24)
5
- - - 25 - 12,474
HIT Facility 44,553 - 7,500 (3) - 153 - 52,203
Lease Liability 657 (193)
1
- - 128 - (16)
4
576
Total liabilities 70,107 (2,973) 7,500 (3) 128 202 824 75,785
1 January
2020
£’000
Payments
1
£’000
Receipts
1
£’000
Debt
issue
costs
1
£’000
Additions
Non-cash
£’000
Amortisation
of debt issue
costs
Non-cash
£’000
Other
Non-
cash
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
ZDP Shares 16,825 (4,443) - (44) (829)
2
76 839
3
12,424
Corporate Bond 10,000 (6,125) 8,700 (111) - 1 8
3
12,473
HIT Facility 44,191 (3,500) 4,187 (159) - 124 (290)
3
44,553
Lease Liability 890 (216) - - - - (17)
4
657
Total liabilities 71,906 (14,284) 12,887 (314) (829) 201 540 70,107
1
These amounts can be found under financing cash flows in the cash flow statement.
2
A loan to the value of £829,000 which sat within Sancus loans and loan equivalents was swapped for 621,586 ZDP shares.
3
Comprises interest accruals and unpaid debt issue costs.
4
Lease variations.
5
Interest within operating cash flows.
20. CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
The Directors consider the following entities as wholly owned subsidiaries of the Group as at 31 December 2021.
Theirresults and financial positions are included within its consolidated results.
Subsidiary entity
Date of
Incorporation
Country of
Incorporation Nature of Holding % held
Sancus Group Holdings Limited 27 December 2013 Guernsey Directly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Lending (Jersey) Limited 1 July 2013 Jersey Indirectly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Lending (Guernsey) Limited 18 June 2014 Guernsey Indirectly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Lending (Gibraltar) Limited 10 March 2015 Gibraltar Indirectly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Lending (Ireland) Limited 10 April 2017 Ireland Indirectly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Lending (UK) Limited 17 February 2011 UK Indirectly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Holdings (UK) Limited 7 January 2011 UK Indirectly held – Equity Shares 100%
FinTech Ventures Limited 9 December 2015 Guernsey Directly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Properties Limited 21 August 2018 Guernsey Indirectly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Loans Limited 3 July 2017 UK Indirectly held – Equity Shares 100%
Sancus Group Holdings Limited and Sancus Holdings (UK) Limited act as holding companies. Sancus Properties Limited
engages in property development. Fintech Ventures Limited is an investment company, investing in Fintech companies.
The activities of the remaining companies named above relate to the core business of lending.
Sancus BMS Holdings Limited was voluntarily struck off on 13 September 2021 following the sale of the BMS Fund.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
61
Sancus Annual Report 2021
21. FINTECH VENTURES AND OTHER INVESTMENTS
The Directors consider the following entities as associated undertakings of the Group as at 31 December 2021.
Name of Investment: Nature of holding
Country of
incorporation
Percentage
holding Measurement
FinTech Ventures:
LiftForward Inc Indirectly held – Equity USA 18.81% Fair Value
Finexkap Indirectly held – Equity France 10.76% Fair Value
Ovamba Solutions Inc Indirectly held – Equity USA 20.18% Fair Value
Funding Options Limited Indirectly held – Equity and Preference Shares UK 22.78% Fair Value
Open Energy Group Inc Indirectly held – Equity USA 22.71% Fair Value
Finpoint Limited Indirectly held – Equity UK 12.95% Fair Value
The percentage holdings in the above table are on a fully diluted basis, assuming any warrants and management
optionsall vest.
22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – FAIR VALUES AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Sancus loans and loan equivalents
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Non-current
Sancus loans 447 442
Sancus Loans Limited loans 6,196 3,421
Total non-current Sancus loans and loan equivalents 6,643 3,863
Current
Sancus loans 4,269 7,873
Loan equivalents - 117
Sancus Loans Limited loans 42,333 41,379
Total current Sancus loans and loan equivalents 46,602 49,369
Total Sancus loans and loan equivalents 53,245 53,232
Fair Value Estimation
The financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position are grouped
into the fair value hierarchy as follows:
31 December 2021 31 December 2020
Level 2
£’000
Level 3
£’000
Level 2
£’000
Level 3
£’000
Assets
FinTech Ventures investments - 500 - -
Derivative contracts 759 - 94 -
Total assets at Fair Value 759 500 94 -
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
62 Sancus Annual Report 2021
All of the FinTech Ventures investments are categorised as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. In the past the Directors
have estimated the fair value of financial instruments using discounted cash flow methodology, comparable market
transactions, recent capital raises and other transactional data including the performance of the respective businesses.
Having considered the terms, rights and characteristics of the equity and loan stock held by the Group in the FinTech
Ventures investments, as well as the challenges that have faced the platforms during the pandemic, the Board’s estimate
of liquidation value of these assets is £0.5m at 31 December 2021 (31 December 2020: £Nil) following £0.5m deployed
into an existing investment in March 2021. Changes in the performance of these businesses and access to future returns
via its current holdings could affect the amounts ultimately realised on the disposal of these investments, which may be
greater or less than £0.5m. There have been no transfers between levels in the period (2020: None).
FinTech Ventures investments
31 December 2021
Equity
£’000
Loans
£’000
Total
£’000
Opening fair value - - -
New investments/divestments (8) 74 66
Realised gains recognised in profit and loss 8 426 434
Closing fair value - 500 500
31 December 2020
Equity
£’000
Loans
£’000
Total
£’000
Opening fair value 4,500 1,799 6,299
New investments/divestments - (277) (277)
Unrealised losses recognised in profit and loss (4,500) (1,496) (5,996)
Foreign exchange loss - (26) (26)
Closing fair value - - -
Assets at Amortised Cost
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Sancus loans and loan equivalents 53,245 53,232
Trade and other receivables 4,196 7,487
Cash and cash equivalents 12,436 15,786
Total assets at amortised cost 69,877 76,505
Due to the relatively short-term nature of the above assets, their carrying amount is considered to be the same as their
fair value.
Liabilities at Amortised Cost
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
ZDP Shares 10,532 12,424
Corporate Bond 12,474 12,473
HIT Facility 52,203 44,553
Trade and other payables 2,656 2,453
Provisions in respect of guarantees - 1,542
Total liabilities at amortised cost 77,865 73,445
Refer to Note 17 for further information on liabilities.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
63
Sancus Annual Report 2021
22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – FAIR VALUES AND RISK MANAGEMENT continued
Risk Management
The Group is exposed to financial risk through its investment in a range of financial instruments, i.e. in the equity and debt
of investee companies and through the use of debt instruments to fund its investment in loans. Such risks are categorised
as capital risk, liquidity risk, investment risk, credit risk, and market risk (market price risk, interest rate risk and foreign
currency risk).
Comments supplementary to those on risk management in the Corporate Governance section of this report are included below.
1. Capital Risk Management
The Group’s capital comprises ordinary shares as well as a number of debt instruments. Its objective when managing this
capital is to enable the Group to continue as a going concern in order to provide a consistent appropriate risk-adjusted
return to shareholders, and to support the continued development of its investment activities. Details of the Group’s
equity is disclosed in Note 16 and of its debt in Note 17.
The Group and its subsidiaries (with the exception of Sancus Lending (UK) Limited, which is regulated by the FCA) are
not subject to regulatory or industry specific requirements to hold a minimum level of capital, other than the legal
requirements for Guernsey incorporated entities. The Group considers the amount and composition of its capital is
currently in proportion to its risk profile.
The Group monitors the ratio of debt (loans payable, bonds and ZDP Shares) to other capital which, based upon shareholder
approval, is limited to 5 to 1 (or 500%). At year-end this ratio increased to 394% (31 December 2020: 235%) due to the HIT
facility. The HIT facility is non-recourse to Sancus. Excluding HIT, the ratio at year-end was 120% (31 December 2020: 84%).
2. Liquidity risk
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and the availability of funding through an adequate
amount of committed credit facilities to meet obligations when due. At the end of the reporting period the group held
cash of £12,436,000. The Group Treasury Committee monitors rolling forecasts of the group’s cash position in relation to
its obligations as they become due on a monthly basis. In addition, the group’s liquidity management involves projecting
cash flows and considering the level of liquid assets necessary to meet obligations. Where necessary contingency plans
are made to realise assets which are reasonably liquid in the short term.
The following table analyses the Group’s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the period to the
contractual maturity date. The amounts in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
Contractual maturities of financial liabilities
31 December 2021
Within
12 months
£’000
Between
1 and 2 years
£’000
Between
2 and 5 years
£’000
Total
£’000
ZDP shares 10,532 - - 10,532
Corporate bond - - 12,474 12,474
Sancus Loans Limited - - 52,203 52,203
Trade and other payables 2,206 212 152 2,570
Total liabilities 12,738 212 64,829 77,779
31 December 2020
Within
12 months
£’000
Between
1 and 2 years
£’000
Between
2 and 5 years
£’000
Total
£’000
ZDP shares - 12,424 - 12,424
Corporate bond - - 12,473 12,473
Sancus Loans Limited - - 44,553 44,553
Trade and other payables 3,408 200 269 3,877
Total liabilities 3,408 12,624 57,295 73,327
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
64 Sancus Annual Report 2021
3. Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in market interest rates
andthat mismatches in the interest rates applying to assets and liabilities will impact on the Group’s earnings.
The Group’s cash balances, debt instruments and loan notes are exposed to interest rate risk.
The Group did not enter into any interest rate risk hedging transactions during the current or prior years.
The table below summarises the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk:
31 December 2021
Floating rate
Financial
Instruments
£’000
Fixed Rate
Financial
Instruments
£’000
Total
£’000
ASSETS
Sancus loans and loan equivalents - 53,245 53,245
Cash and cash equivalents 12,436 - 12,436
Total assets 12,436 53,245 65,681
LIABILITIES
ZDP shares - 10,532 10,532
Corporate Bond - 12,474 12,474
Sancus Loans Limited - 52,203 52,203
Total liabilities - 75,209 75,209
Total interest sensitivity gap 12,436 (21,964) (9,528)
31 December 2020
Floating rate
Financial
Instruments
£’000
Fixed Rate
Financial
Instruments
£’000
Total
£’000
ASSETS
Sancus Loans and loan equivalents 3,693 49,539 53,232
Cash and cash equivalents 15,786 - 15,786
Total assets 19,479 49,539 69,018
LIABILITIES
ZDP shares - 12,424 12,424
Corporate Bond - 12,473 12,473
Sancus Loans Limited - 44,553 44,553
Total liabilities - 69,450 69,450
Total interest sensitivity gap 19,479 (19,911) (432)
Interest rate sensitivities
The Group currently holds £12,436,000 in cash deposits, predominantly in sterling. Whilst interest rates are currently
negligible there is a risk that these could go negative. At the current level of cash deposits this could cost the group
£124,000 per annum for every 1% decrease in interest rates. The Group does not hold significant amounts in foreign
currencies for any period of time.
The Treasury Committee reviews interest rate risk on an ongoing basis, and the exposure is reported quarterly to the
Board and/or Audit and Risk Committee.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
65
Sancus Annual Report 2021
22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – FAIR VALUES AND RISK MANAGEMENT continued
4. Investment risk
Investment risk is defined as the risk that an investment’s actual return will be different to that expected. Investment risk
primarily arises from the Group’s exposure to its FinTech Ventures portfolio (see Note 3). This risk in turn is driven by the
underlying risks taken by the platforms themselves – their own strategic, liquidity, credit and operational risks.
The Group’s framework for the management of this risk includes the following:
>
Seats on the Boards of most of the platforms, which allow input into strategy and monitoring of progress;
>
pre-emptive rights on participation in capital raises, or the support for capital raises, to protect against dilution;
>
regular monitoring of the financial results of platforms;
>
bi-annual reviews of the valuations of platforms, which provide an opportunity to test the success of platforms’
strategies; and
>
quarterly reporting to the Board on these matters.
The Group measures fair values using the following fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used
inmaking the measurements.
>
Level 1 – Inputs that are quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical instruments. A market is regarded
as “active” if transactions of the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing
information on an on-going basis. The Group measures financial instruments quoted in an active market at a bid price.
>
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable either directly (i.e. as prices) or
indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). This category includes instruments valued using: quoted market prices in active
markets for similar instruments; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are considered less
than active; or other valuation techniques in which all significant inputs are directly or indirectly observable from
market data. The chosen valuation technique incorporates all of the factors that market participants would take into
account in pricing a transaction.
>
Level 3 – Inputs that are unobservable. This category includes all instruments for which the valuation technique
includes inputs not based on observable data and the unobservable inputs have a significant effect on the instrument’s
valuation. This category includes instruments that are valued based on quoted prices for similar instruments but for
which significant unobservable adjustments or assumptions are required to reflect differences between the
instruments. If in the case of any investment the Directors at any time consider that the above basis of valuation is
inappropriate or that the value determined in accordance with the foregoing principles is unfair, they are entitled to
substitute what in their opinion, is a fair value. In this case, the fair value is estimated with care and in good faith by the
Directors in consultation with the Executive Management Team with a view to establishing the probable realisation
value for such shares as at close of business on the relevant valuation day.
All of the FinTech Ventures investments are categorised as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. In the past the Directors
have estimated the fair value of financial instruments using discounted cash flow methodology, comparable market
transactions, recent capital raises and other transactional data including the performance of the respective businesses.
Having considered the terms, rights and characteristics of the equity and loan stock held by the Group in the FinTech
Ventures investments, as well as the challenges that have faced the platforms during the pandemic, the Board’s estimate
of liquidation value of these assets is £0.5m at 31 December 2021 (31 December 2020: £Nil) following £0.5m deployed
into an existing investment in March 2021. Changes in the performance of these businesses and access to future returns
via its current holdings could affect the amounts ultimately realised on the disposal of these investments, which may be
greater or less than £0.5m. There have been no transfers between levels in the period (2020: None).
5. Credit risk
Credit risk is defined as the risk that a borrower/debtor may fail to make required repayments within the contracted time
scale. The Group invests in senior debt, senior subordinated debt, junior subordinated debt and secured loans. Credit risk
is taken in direct lending to third party borrowers, investing in loan funds, lending to associated platforms and loans
arranged by associated platforms.
The Group mitigates credit risk by only entering into agreements related to loan instruments in which there is sufficient
security held against the loans or where the operating strength of the investee companies is considered sufficient to
support the loan amounts outstanding.
Credit risk is determined on initial recognition of each loan and re-assessed at each balance sheet date. The risk assessment
is undertaken by the Executive Management Team at the time of the agreements, and the Executive Management Team
continues to evaluate the loan instruments in the context of these agreements. Credit risk is categorised into Stage 1, Stage
2 and Stage 3 with Stage 1 being to recognise 12 month Expected Credit Losses (ECL), Stage 2 being to recognise Lifetime
ECL not credit impaired and Stage 3 being to recognise Lifetime ECL credit impaired.
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
66 Sancus Annual Report 2021
Credit risk is initially evaluated using the LTV, (LTGDV and LTF where relevant) and the circumstances of the individual
borrower. For the majority of loans security takes the form of real estate. There has been no significant change in the quality
of this security over the prior year. When determining credit risk macro-economic factors such as GDP, unemployment
rates, the impact of Covid-19 on real estate and other relevant factors are also taken into account. A loan is considered to be
in default when there is a failure to meet the legal obligation of the loan agreement. Having regards to the principles of IFRS
9 this would also include provisions against loans that are considered by management as unlikely to pay their obligations in
full without realisation of collateral. Once identified as being in default a re-assessment of the credit risk of that loan will be
undertaken using the factors as noted above. A decision will then be made as to whether to credit impair that asset.
In some instances borrowers will request loan modifications, extensions or renegotiation of terms. Any such event will
trigger a reassessment of the credit risk of that loan where the reasons for the modification, extension or renegotiation
will be carefully assessed and may result in that asset being credit impaired.
The entities in the Sancus Lending Group operate Credit Committees which are responsible for evaluating and deciding
upon loan proposals, as well as monitoring the recoverability of loans, and taking action on any doubtful accounts. All
lending undertaken by Sancus Lending is secured. The credit committee reports to the Sancus Lending Board on a
quarterly basis.
Provision for ECL
A probability of default is assigned to each loan. This probability of default is arrived at by reference to historical data and
the ongoing status of each loan which is reviewed on a regular basis. The loss given default is deemed to be nil where LTV
is equal to or less than 65%, as it is assumed that the asset can be sold and full recovery made.
Provision for ECL is made using the credit risk, the probability of default (PD) and the loss given default (PL) all of which
are underpinned by the Loan to Value (LTV), historical position, forward looking considerations and on occasion,
subsequent events and the subjective judgement of the Board. Preliminary calculations for ECL are performed on a loan
by loan basis using the simple formula Outstanding Loan Value (exposure at default) x PD x PL and are then amended as
necessary according to the more subjective measures as noted above.
To reflect the time value of money ECL is discounted back to the reporting date using the effective interest rate of the
asset (or an approximation thereof) that was determined at initial recognition.
The following tables provide information on amounts reserved for ECL on loans and loan equivalents as at 31 December 2021
and 31 December 2020 based on the model adopted by management. Loans through platforms were added to the table in
2020 (previously disclosed separately and not included in the below analysis).
Sancus loans and loan equivalents at 31 December 2021
Stage 1
£’000
Stage 2
£’000
Stage 3
£’000
Total
£’000
Closing loans at 31 December 2020 41,972 4,047 7,213 53,232
New Loans 27,794 - - 27,794
Loans Repaid (17,640) (4,578) (3,273) (25,491)
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 (5,739) 5,739 - -
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 3 (16,247) - 16,247 -
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 3 - (368) 368 -
Loans written off (80) - - (80)
Movement in ECL - 903 (3,113) (2,210)
Closing loans at 31 December 2021 30,060 5,743 17,442 53,245
Loss allowance at 31 December 2021
Stage 1
£’000
Stage 2
£’000
Stage 3
£’000
Total
£’000
Closing loss allowance at 31 December 2020 - 903 3,296 4,199
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 3 - (37) 37 -
(Decrease)/Increase in provision - - 3,076 3,076
Utilisations - (866) - (866)
Closing loss allowance at 31 December 2021 - - 6,409 6,409
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
67
Sancus Annual Report 2021
22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – FAIR VALUES AND RISK MANAGEMENT continued
(5) Credit risk continued
For certain loans the range of outcomes for loss given default considered by the Directors is significant and therefore
hasa material impact on the calculation of ECL.
Sancus loans and loan equivalents at 31 December 2020
Stage 1
£’000
Stage 2
£’000
Stage 3
£’000
Total
£’000
Closing loans at 31 December 2019 54,188 8,849 1,195 64,232
Add loans through platforms 31 - - 31
54,219 8,849 1,195 64,263
New Loans 19,168 - - 19,168
Loans Repaid (25,267) (3,582) (19) (28,868)
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 (380) 380 - -
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 3 (5,768) - 5,768 -
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 3 - (1,910) 1,910 -
Movement in ECL - 310 (1,641) (1,331)
Closing loans at 31 December 2020 41,972 4,047 7,213 53,232
Loss allowance at 31 December 2020
Stage 1
£’000
Stage 2
£’000
Stage 3
£’000
Total
£’000
Closing loss allowance at 31 December 2019 - 1,213 1,655 2,868
Transfer from Stage 2 to Stage 3 - (125) 125 -
(Decrease)/Increase in provision - (185) 1,516 1,331
Closing loss allowance at 31 December 2020 - 903 3,296 4,199
Reconciliation of Provision for ECLs to charge in the statement of comprehensive income
Loans
Trade
Debtors Guarantees Total
Loss allowance at 31 December 2020 4,199 2,190 1,542 7,931
Charge/(credit) for the year 2021 3,076 4,865 (1,542) 6,399
Utilisations (866) - - (866)
Loss allowance at 31 December 2021 6,409 7,055 - 13,464
For certain loans the range of outcomes for loss given default considered by the Directors is significant and therefore has
a material impact on the calculation of ECL.
6. Market price risk
The Group has no exposure to market price risk of financial assets valued on a Level 1 basis as disclosed earlier in this note.
7. Foreign exchange risk
Foreign exchange risk is the risk that the value of financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in foreign exchange
rates. Investments made in currencies other than Sterling are currently valued at £Nil and therefore there is no exposure.
The exchange rates used by the Group to translate foreign currency balances are as follows:
Currency
31 December
2021
30 June
2021
31 December
2020
30 June
2020
31 December
2019
EUR 1.1898 1.1663 1.1202 1.1039 1.1815
USD 1.3527 1.3830 1.3664 1.2399 1.3259
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
68 Sancus Annual Report 2021
The Treasury Committee monitors the Group’s currency position on a regular basis, and the Board of Directors reviews
iton a quarterly basis. Loans denominated in Euros which are taken out through the HIT facility are hedged. Forward
contracts to sell Euros at loan maturity dates are entered into when loans are drawn in Euros. The following forward
foreign exchange contracts were open at the respective dates:
At 31 December 2021
Counterparty Settlement date
Buy
Currency
Buy Amount
£’000
Sell
currency
Sell amount
€’000
Unrealised
gain £’000
EWealthGlobal Group Limited February 2022 to
May 2023
GBP 14,769 Euro 16,817 623
Liberum Wealth Limited February 2022 GBP 1,183 Euro 1,299 92
Lumon Risk Management April 2022 to
May 2023
GBP 5,148 Euro 6,046 44
Unrealised gain on forward foreign contracts 759
At 31 December 2020
Counterparty Settlement date
Buy
Currency
Buy Amount
£’000
Sell
currency
Sell amount
€’000
Unrealised
gain/(loss)
£’000
EWealthGlobal Group Limited January 2021 to
February 2022
GBP 4,121 Euro 4,641 (50)
Liberum Wealth Limited January 2021 to
December 2021
GBP 8,062 Euro 8,854 144
Unrealised gain on forward foreign contracts 94
No hedging has been taken out against investments in the FinTech Ventures platforms (2020: £Nil).
23. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the Directors/Executive Management Team
Non-executive Directors
As at 31 December 2021, the non-executive Directors’ annualised fees, excluding all reasonable expenses incurred in the
course of their duties which were reimbursed by the Company, were as detailed in the table below:
31 December
2021
£
31 December
2020
£
Steven Smith (Chairman – appointed Chairman 31.8.21) 50,000 -
Patrick Firth (Chairman – resigned Chairman 31.8.21) - 48,750
John Whittle 42,500 41,438
Nick Wakefield 35,000 34,125
Golf Investments Limited (‘Golf’), a subsidiary of Somerston, of which Mr Wakefield is a Director, holds 200,349,684
ordinary shares in the Company, representing 40.9 per cent of the current issued share capital. From time to time, the
Somerston Group may participate as a Co-Funder in Sancus Lending loans. Other than this and the directors’ fees and
expenses in relation to Mr Wakefield’s appointment as a director the Group does not transact with either Golf or Somerston.
Total Directors’ fees charged to the Company for the year ended 31 December 2021 were £138,279 (31 December 2020: £124,313)
with £Nil (31 December 2020: £Nil) remaining unpaid at the year-end.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
69
Sancus Annual Report 2021
23. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS continued
Transactions with the Directors/Executive Management Team continued
Executive Management Team
The Executive Management Team consisted of Rory Mepham (appointed 30 June 2021), Andrew Whelan (resigned
30June 2021), Emma Stubbs, and Dan Walker (resigned 31 January 2022). The Executive Management Team members’
remuneration from the Company, excluding all reasonable expenses incurred in the course of their duties which were
reimbursed by the Company, was as detailed in the table below:
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Aggregate remuneration in respect of qualifying service – fixed salary 598 646
Aggregate amounts contributed to Money Purchase pension schemes 24 48
Aggregate bonus paid (cash) 325 210
See remuneration report for further details. All amounts have been charged to Operating Expenses.
Directors’ and Persons Discharging Managerial Responsibilities (“PDMR”) shareholdings in the Company
The Directors and PDMRs had the following beneficial interests in the Ordinary Shares of the Company:
31 December 2021 31 December 2020
No. of
Ordinary
Shares Held
% of
Ordinary
Shares
No. of
Ordinary
Shares Held
% of Ordinary
Shares
John Whittle 138,052 0.03 138,052 0.03
Andrew Whelan* - - 9,553,734 1.95
Emma Stubbs 1,380,940 0.28 1,380,940 0.28
Dan Walker 911,300 0.19 911,300 0.19
*Andrew Whelan resigned 30 June 2021.
During the year and prior year no directors received dividends on their Ordinary Share holdings in the Company.
Mr Walker had an outstanding unsecured loan from Sancus Holdings (UK) Limited in the amount of £31,053 at
31December 2021 and 31 December 2020. This was waived in January 2022. The loan was interest free and repayable
ondemand.
From time to time members of key management personnel participate as co-funders in loans originated by the Group.
Transactions with connected entities
The following transactions with connected entities took place during the year:
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Receivable from/(payable to) related parties
Sancus (IOM) Holdings Limited (16) 2
Sancus (IOM) Limited - 36
Amberton Limited 10 -
Amberton Asset Management Limited - 11
Office and staff costs recharges
Amberton Asset Management Limited 18 41
Amberton Limited 9 -
Sancus (IOM) Limited - 125
There is no ultimate controlling party of the Company. All platform loans and preference shares bear interest at
acommercial rate.
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
70 Sancus Annual Report 2021
24. LEASES
The Group as Lessee
Maturity Analysis – contracted undiscounted cash flows
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Within one year 247 240
In the second to fifth years inclusive 413 569
After five years - -
Total undiscounted cash flows 660 809
All lease commitments relate to office space.
Lease liabilities included in the statement of financial position
31 December
2021
£’000
31 December
2020
£’000
Current 212 188
Non-current 364 469
Total lease liabilities 576 657
Amounts recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Depreciation expense on right-of-use assets 190 208
Interest expense on lease liabilities 36 64
Expense related to short term leases 78 137
Income received from sub-leasing right-of-use assets 60 -
25. COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES
The Group’s commitments and guarantees are described below.
HIT Facility
Sancus Group has invested £9.5m (2020: £6.3m) of its own capital in Sancus Loans Limited which sits in a £5.8m first
lossposition as part of the HIT facility. Sancus has also provided HIT with a guarantee, capped at £2m that it will continue
to ensure the orderly wind down of the HIT related loan book, in the event of the insolvency of Sancus Group, given its
position as facility and security agent. Nothing has been provided in the accounts for this (2020: £Nil).
Sancus Loan Notes
SLN7 launched on 10 May 2021 with £16.6m assets. As at 31 December 2021 this had £16.3m assets. Sancus Group
Holdings Limited has a 10% first loss position on this loan note.
Unfunded Commitments
As at 31 December 2021 the Group has unfunded commitments of £47.3m (31 December 2020: £28.4m). These unfunded
commitments primarily represent the undrawn portion of development finance facilities. Drawdowns are conditional on
satisfaction of specified conditions precedent, including that the borrower is not in breach of its representations or
covenants under the loan or security documents. The figure quoted is the maximum exposure assuming that all such
conditions for drawdown are met. Directors expect the majority of these commitments to be filled by Co-Funders.
26. POST YEAR END EVENTS
On 31 January 2022 the Group sold its 29.32% interest in Sancus (Isle of Man) Holdings Limited for a consideration of £500,000.
Strategic Report Corporate Governance Financial Statements Additional Information
71
Sancus Annual Report 2021
Non-executive Directors Patrick Anthony Seymour Firth (Chairman – resigned 31 August 2021)
Stephen Smith (Chairman – appointed as a NED on 11 May 2021,
appointedChairman 31 August 2021)
John Richard Whittle
Nick Wakefield (resigned 8 March 2022)
Tracy Clarke (appointed 8 March 2022)
Executive Directors Andrew Noel Whelan (resigned 30 June 2021)
Emma Stubbs
Rory Mepham (appointed 30 June 2021)
The address of the Directors is the company’s registered office
Executive Management Team
Chief Executive Officer Andrew Noel Whelan (resigned 30 June 2021)
Chief Executive Officer Rory Mepham (appointed 30 June 2021)
Chief Financial Officer Emma Stubbs
Chief Operating Officer
and UK Managing Director
Daniel Walker (resigned 31 January 2022)
Chief Investment Officer James Waghorn (appointed 8 March 2022)
Registered Office Block C, Hirzel Court, Hirzel Street, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 2NL
Nominated Advisor and Broker Liberum Capital Limited, Ropemaker Place, 25 Ropemaker Street,
London,EC2Y9LY
Company Secretary Sanne Fund Services Limited (formerly Praxis Fund Services Limited)
Sarnia House, Le Truchot, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 1GR
Legal Advisors, Channel Islands Carey Olsen, PO Box 98, Carey House, Les Banques, St Peter Port,
Guernsey, GY1 4BZ
Legal Advisors, UK Stephenson Harwood, 1 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7SH
Legal Advisors, USA Troutman Pepper, 3000 Two Logon Square, Eighteenth and Arch Streets,
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799
Bankers Barclays International, 1st Floor, 39041 Broad Street, St Helier, Jersey, JE4 8NE
Auditors Moore Stephens, PO Box 146, Park Place, Park Street, St Peter Port,
Guernsey,GY1 3HZ
Registrar Link Market Services Limited, The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road,
Beckenham,Kent, BR3 4TU
Public Relations Instinctif Partners Limited, 65 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7NQ
Officers and professional advisers
72 Sancus Annual Report 2021
www.sancus.com