UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 COMPENSATION

OR

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report ________

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number 001-42553

Baiya International Group Inc.

(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Cayman Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

D501-12, Building D, Guanghong Meiju

No. 5 Golf Avenue, Hehua Community

Pinghu Street, Longhua District

Shenzhen, China

(Address of principal executive offices)

Siyu Yang, Chief Executive Officer
Room 18022, Floor 18

New York, NY 10120

Tel: +1 828-900-8888

Email: [email protected]

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of December 31, 2025: 1,185,835  Class A Ordinary Shares were issued and outstanding.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes ☐ No ☒

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards † provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☐ No ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐ No ☒

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

We are an exempted company with limited liability incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands on October 18, 2021. As a holding company with no material operations of our own, we conduct all of our operations in China through a variable interest entity, or “VIE”, Shenzhen Gongwuyuan Network Technology Co., Ltd. (“Gongwuyuan”), and its subsidiaries, or collectively, the “PRC operating entities.” We entered into a series of agreements date December 29, 2021 (the “Contractual Arrangements”) with the VIE and certain shareholders of Gongwuyuan, and this structure involves unique risks to investors. Neither we nor our subsidiaries own any equity interests in the PRC operating entities under the VIE structure.

We are headquartered in Shenzhen, China, and currently our business focuses on three primary services: (i) job matching services; (ii) entrusted recruitment services; (iii) project outsourcing services in the flexible employment market within China, primarily in the core manufacturing regions including the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta region. We previously provided labor dispatching services; however, this service was discontinued in 2023 due to regulatory reforms issued by the Chinese Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, as well as its negative profit margins.”

Our website is www.gwyapp.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, references in this annual report to “we,” “us,” “our company,” “our”, and “Baiya” refer to Baiya International Group Inc., a Cayman Islands holding company, its subsidiaries, the VIE and its subsidiaries in China, as the context requires.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report contains forward-looking statements as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) that involve significant risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include information about our possible or assumed future results of operations or our performance. Words such as “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify the forward-looking statements. The risk factors and cautionary language in this Report provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations described in our forward-looking statements, including among other things, the items identified in “Item 3.D. — Risk Factors” section of this Report.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates which are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this Report, or the documents to which we refer readers in this Report, to reflect any change in our expectations with respect to such statements or any change in events, conditions or circumstances upon which any statement is based.

PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

Our Holding Company Structure and the Contractual Arrangements with the VIE

We are not a Chinese operating company, but an offshore holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. As a holding company with no material operations of our own, we conduct all of our operations in China through a variable interest entity, or “VIE”, Gongwuyuan and its subsidiaries, or collectively, the “PRC operating entities.” We entered into a series of agreements date December 29, 2021 with the VIE and certain shareholders of Gongwuyuan, and this structure involves unique risks to investors. Neither we nor our subsidiaries own any equity interests in the PRC operating entities under the VIE structure.

Neither we nor our subsidiaries own any share or equity interest in the PRC operating entities. Instead, we consolidate the financial results of the VIE as a primary beneficiary through the Contractual Arrangements between our wholly owned subsidiary entity, Shenzhen Pengze Future Technology Co., Ltd. (“Pengze WFOE”), Gongwuyuan, the VIE, and certain shareholders of Gongwuyuan. We are utilizing the VIE structure because some of the VIE’s businesses may be prohibited or restricted from direct foreign investment under Chinese law. As a result of Baiya’s indirect ownership in Pengze WFOE and the Contractual Arrangements, we treat the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries as our consolidated entities under U.S. GAAP, but we do not own equity interests in the VIE or its subsidiaries. We have consolidated the financial results of the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See “Item 4.C. Information on the Company—Organizational Structure—Contractual Arrangements among Pengze WFOE, Gongwuyuan, and the Shareholders of the VIE.”

As we chose such VIE structure, we are subject to certain unique risks and uncertainties that may not otherwise exist if we had direct equity ownership in the PRC operating entities. Because we do not directly hold equity interests in the VIE and its subsidiaries, our Contractual Arrangements may not be effective in providing control over Gongwuyuan. Further, we are subject to risks due to uncertainty of the interpretation and the application of the PRC laws and regulations, including but not limited to limitations on foreign ownership and regulatory review of overseas listing of PRC companies through a special purpose vehicle, and the validity and enforcement of the Contractual Arrangements. We are also subject to the risks of uncertainty about any future actions of the PRC government in this regard that could disallow the VIE structure, which would likely result in a material change in our operations and/or cause the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares to decrease significantly or become worthless. As of the date of this annul report, the agreements under the Contractual Arrangements have not been tested in any court of law.

We are subject to certain legal and operational risks associated with the VIE operations in China through the Contractual Arrangements. Additionally, PRC laws and regulations governing our current business operations are sometimes vague and uncertain, and therefore, these risks may result in a material change in our operations, significant depreciation of the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares, or a complete hindrance of our ability to offer or continue to offer our securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. The Chinese government may intervene or influence the operations of the PRC operating entities at any time and may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, which could result in a material change in the operations of the PRC operating entities and/or the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares. Further, any actions by the Chinese government to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

Recent Regulatory Developments in China

Cyber Security Review and Data Privacy Regulations

The PRC regulatory authorities have promulgated, among others, the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC(the “PIPL”), the Data Security Law of the PRC and the Amendment to Cybersecurity Law of the PRC to ensure cybersecurity, data and personal information protection. These new laws, as well as other proposed regulations, demonstrate that relevant laws and regulations governing these areas are developing along with the enforced and constantly tightening of relevant regulatory supervision. The State Council of the PRC promulgated the Regulations on the Protection of the Security of Critical Information Infrastructure on July 30, 2021, which took effect on September 1, 2021. This regulation requires, among other things, that certain competent authorities identify and protect critical information infrastructures. The CAC and a number of other departments under the State Council promulgated the Cybersecurity Review Measures on December 28, 2021, which became effective on February 15, 2022. According to this regulation, critical information infrastructure operators purchasing network products and services and network platform operators carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, are required to conduct cybersecurity review. On July 7, 2022, the CAC issued the Security Assessment Measures, which became effective on September 1, 2022 and require a data processor to apply to the CAC for a data export security assessment under certain circumstances. On February 22, 2023, the CAC issued the Measures for the Standard Contract for Outbound Transfer of Personal Information, which requires a data processor to enter into standard contracts under certain circumstances. On March 22, 2024, the CAC issued the Cross-Border Data Flows Provisions, which further regulates that the responsibility to apply for data export security assessments, submit standard contract, or obtain compliance certifications can be exempted under certain circumstances. See “—Permits and Permission Required from the PRC Authorities for Our Operations” above in this annual report for more information.

On September 1, 2021, the Data Security Law of the PRC became effective, which imposes data security and privacy obligations on entities and individuals conducting data-related activities, and introduces a data classification and hierarchical protection system. In addition, the Standing Committee of the NPC promulgated the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC on August 20, 2021, and this law took effect on November 1, 2021. The PIPL further emphasizes processors’ obligations and responsibilities for personal information protection and sets out the basic rules for processing personal information and the rules for cross-border provision of personal information. On September 24, 2024, the State Council formally issued the Cyber Data Security Regulations, which became effective on January 1, 2025, stipulating that where network data handlers carry out network data processing activities that affect or may affect national security, they should undergo a national security review in accordance with relevant national regulations. The Cyber Data Security Regulations optimize regulations for cross-border data security management, specifying conditions under which network data processors may provide personal information abroad in accordance with international treaties or agreements. The regulations clarify that data not identified or publicly disclosed as important data by relevant regions or departments need not undergo cross-border security assessments for important data. Further, the Cyber Data Security Regulations set forth network data security protection requirements for network platform service providers, third-party product and service providers, and other relevant entities. On October 28, 2025, the Standing Committee of the NPC adopted amendments to the Cybersecurity Law, which took effect on January 1, 2026. The revisions align the legal liability for personal information processing with the PIPL and other applicable laws, ensuring that breaches of personal data are subject to a cohesive legal framework. Furthermore, the amendments introduce a tiered penalty system: for violations with particularly serious consequences, companies may face fines of up to RMB10 million, and responsible individuals may face fines of up to RMB1 million. The amendments also expand the extraterritorial application of the Cybersecurity Law to cover overseas activities that endanger China’s cybersecurity. These developments indicate a continued regulatory focus on data protection and could impact our compliance costs and operational procedures, particularly concerning customer data handling and the potential designation of core business systems as critical information infrastructure. On September 11, 2025, the Cyberspace Administration of China promulgated the Measures for the Administration of National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting, which took effect on November 1, 2025. These measures require that network operators engaged in network construction, operation, or network-based service provision within the territory of the People’s Republic of China shall report cybersecurity incidents in accordance with the provisions thereof once such incidents occur. In particular, for cybersecurity incidents at or above the “relatively significant level”, network operators shall promptly report to the local provincial-level cyberspace administration department, and in any event, such reporting shall not be delayed for more than four hours.

There are uncertainties as to the interpretation and application of these cybersecurity and data privacy laws, regulations and standards, and they may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our current policies and practices or require changes to the features of our data systems. If the CAC or other regulatory agencies later deem us to be a CIIO and require that we obtain their approvals for our future offshore offerings, we may be unable to obtain such approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or be worthless. In addition, implementation of industry-wide regulations affecting our business operations could limit our ability to attract new customers and/or users and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline. Therefore, investors of our company and our business face potential uncertainties from actions taken by the PRC regulatory authorities affecting our business. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received inquiry, notice, warning, sanctions or regulatory objection from the CSRC or the CAC; we continue to monitor evolving PIPL/Data Security Law enforcement.

Potential CSRC Filings on Overseas Listing

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC promulgated the Trial Measures and relevant notes and Supporting Guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. The Trial Measures seek to regulate all types of overseas offerings and listings by PRC based companies, including: (a) direct overseas listings, i.e. overseas listings by joint-stock companies which are established in PRC (such as H shares, N shares, GDRs); and (b) indirect overseas listings, i.e. overseas listings by PRC based companies in the names of an overseas entity (such as red-chip listings), if such issuers meets both of the following conditions: (i) more than 50% of its audited financial indicators (either operating revenue, profits, total assets or net assets) for the most recent accounting year is accounted for by its PRC-based companies, and (ii) major business activities or operations are conducted within the territory of PRC; main places of business are located within the territory of the PRC; or the majority of senior management staff domicile in the PRC or are Chinese citizens.

The Trial Measures does not only govern initial public offerings (the “IPOs”), but also governs spin-off listings, single or multiple acquisitions of domestic assets, share swaps or transfer of shares, reverse takeovers, SPAC listings, subsequent issuances of securities, secondary listings or dual listing, etc. In addition to offering and listing of shares, offering and listing of depository receipts, corporate bonds convertible to shares, and other equity securities by PRC-based companies shall also be subject to the filing requirements under the Trial Measures.

The Trial Measures and Supporting Guidelines require PRC-based companies that seek overseas offerings and listings to fulfill the filing procedures with and report relevant information to the CSRC, specifically: (a) for an IPO, the filing with CSRC shall be conducted within three (3) working days following the submission of the application; (b) for a subsequent issuance of securities, the filing shall be conducted within three (3) working days following the completion of the offering; (c) for the listings in other stock markets (e.g. secondary listings or dual listings), the same filing timeline applied to an IPO shall apply; (d) for the listing of assets via multiple acquisitions, share swaps, transfers of shares (e.g. reverse takeover), the same filing timeline applied to an IPO shall apply; (e) for the unlisted shares of PRC Companies applying for conversion to listed shares trading on overseas market, the filings shall be conducted pursuant to the other regulations.

Furthermore, an overseas offering and listing would be prohibited under the following circumstances: (a) it is explicitly prohibited under applicable laws and administrative regulations; (b) there exists national security concerns as reviewed and determined by competent authorities under the State Council; (c) a crime has been committed by the issuer’s PRC-based company, its controlling shareholder(s) or actual shareholder(s) in the last three (3) years (e.g. corruption, bribery, embezzlement, misappropriation of property or undermining the market economy orders); (d) the issuer’s PRC-based company is under investigations for criminal acts or major violations of applicable laws and regulations, and no conclusion of the investigation has yet been made; and (e) there exists material ownership disputes over equity interests held by controlling shareholders (or by shareholders who are controlled by the controlling shareholder or actual controllers). If there exists any of the aforementioned circumstances, the overseas offerings and listings shall be postponed or even terminated.

Specifically, if an issuer adopts a VIE structure for the purpose of overseas offering and listing, it shall disclose relevant contractual arrangements to the CSRC through fillings. The Supporting Guidance also provides that PRC counsel needs to verify the following issues, including (i) the participation of foreign investors in the issuer management operation, for example, the appointment of directors; (ii) whether there exist situations where PRC laws and administrative regulations expressly prohibit the use of contractual arrangements to retain business licenses and qualifications, etc.; (iii) whether there exist situations where the PRC operating entity of the issuer falls under the scope of foreign investment security review, or within the restricted or prohibited sectors of foreign investment.

Our PRC subsidiaries and the VIE are not subject to the immediate filing requirements under the Trial Measures. However, in the events of any re-financing in the future, such as subsequent share issuance, our company will be subject to the relevant filing requirements pursuant to the Trial Measures.

On February 24, 2023, the CSRC, the Ministry of Finance, the National Administration of State Secrets Protection and the National Archives Administration jointly issued the Provisions on Strengthening Confidentiality and Archives Administration of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (the “Confidentiality and Archives Provisions”), which became effective from March 31, 2023. The Confidentiality and Archives Provisions specify that during the overseas issuance of securities and listing activities of domestic enterprises, domestic enterprises and securities companies and securities service institutions that provide relevant securities services shall, by strictly abiding by the relevant laws and regulations of the PRC and the requirements therein, establish sound confidentiality and archives management systems, take necessary measures to implement confidentiality and archives management responsibilities, and shall not leak national secrets, work secrets of governmental agencies and undermine national and public interests. Work manuscripts generated in the PRC by securities companies and securities service institutions that provide relevant securities services for overseas issuance and listing of securities by domestic enterprises shall be kept in the PRC. Without the approval of relevant competent authorities, it shall not be transferred overseas. Where archives or copies need to be transferred outside of the PRC, it shall be subject to the approval procedures in accordance with relevant PRC regulations. The Confidentiality and Archives Provisions further require that (a) a domestic enterprise that plans to, either directly or indirectly through its overseas listed entity, publicly disclose or provide to relevant individuals or entities including securities companies, securities service providers and overseas regulators, any documents and materials that contain state secrets or working secrets of government agencies, shall first obtain approval from competent authorities according to law, and file with the secrecy administrative department at the same level; and (b) a domestic enterprise that plans to, either directly or indirectly through its overseas listed entity, publicly disclose or provide to relevant individuals and entities including securities companies, securities service providers and overseas regulators, any other documents and materials that, if leaked, will be detrimental to national security or public interest, shall strictly fulfill relevant procedures stipulated by applicable national regulations.

As of the date of this annual report, we have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanctions or regulatory objection from the CSRC or the CAC.  Because these regulatory actions are relatively new, it is uncertain how soon legislative or regulatory bodies will respond and what existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations will be modified or promulgated, if any, or the potential impact such modified or new laws and regulations will have on our daily business operation, our ability to accept foreign investments and listing on a U.S. or other overseas exchanges. PRC laws and their interpretations and enforcement continue to develop and are subject to change, and the PRC regulators may adopt other rules and restrictions in the future.

Dividends and Other Distributions

We are a holding company with no material operations of our own and do not generate any revenue. We currently conduct substantially all of our operations through the PRC operating entities. Under Cayman Islands law, Baiya may pay a dividend on its shares out of either profit or share premium amount or a combination of both, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts due in the ordinary course of business. If we determine to pay dividends on any of our Class A Ordinary Shares in the future, as a holding company, we will rely on payments made from Gongwuyuan to the Pengze WFOE, pursuant to the Contractual Arrangements, and the dividend payment to Juxing HK from Pengze WFOE, unless we receive proceeds from future offerings. Certain payments from Gongwuyuan to the Pengze WFOE are subject to PRC taxes, including value added tax, or VAT, and enterprise income tax.

We intend to keep any future earnings to re-invest in and finance the expansion of the business of the PRC operating entities, and we do not anticipate that any cash dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future. As of the date of this annul report, no cash transfer or transfer of other assets have occurred between Baiya, its subsidiaries, and the consolidated VIE as well as its subsidiaries. As of the date of this annul report, none of our subsidiaries, the consolidated VIE, or the subsidiaries of the VIE have made any dividends or distributions to Baiya. Currently, we, including our consolidated VIE and the subsidiaries of the VIE, have not adopted or maintained any cash management policies and procedures to govern cash transfer between Baiya, its subsidiaries, and the consolidated VIE as well as the subsidiaries of the VIE, and each entity needs to comply with applicable law or regulations with respect to transfer of funds, dividends and distributions with other entities.

Our Pengze WFOE’s ability to distribute dividends is based upon its distributable earnings. Current PRC regulations permit the Pengze WFOE to pay dividends to Juxing HK only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of our subsidiaries in China is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of its registered capital. Each of such entity in China may also set aside a portion of its after-tax profits to fund an optional reserve, although the amount to be set aside, if any, is determined at the discretion of its shareholders. The reserves can be used to increase the registered capital, cover losses made in past years and enhance the company’s productivity and expand its business.

The PRC government also imposes controls on the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies and the remittance of currencies out of the PRC. Therefore, we may experience difficulties in completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency for the payment of dividends from our profits, if any. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries in the PRC incur debt on their own in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments. If we or our subsidiaries are unable to receive the relevant revenues from our operations through the current Contractual Arrangements, we may be unable to pay dividends on our Class A Ordinary Shares.

Cash dividends, if any, on our Class A Ordinary Shares will be paid in U.S. dollars. If we are considered a PRC tax resident enterprise for tax purposes, any dividends we pay to our overseas shareholders may be regarded as China-sourced income and as a result may be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10.0%.

In order for us to pay dividends to our shareholders, we will rely on payments made from Gongwuyuan to the Pengze WFOE, pursuant to the Contractual Arrangements, and the dividend payments to Juxing HK from the Pengze WFOE. Certain payments from the VIE, Gongwuyuan, to Pengze WFOE are subject to PRC taxes, including VAT and enterprise income tax.

Pursuant to the Arrangement between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income, or the Double Tax Avoidance Arrangement, the 10% withholding tax rate may be lowered to 5% if a Hong Kong resident enterprise owns no less than 25% of a PRC project. However, the 5% withholding tax rate does not automatically apply and certain requirements must be satisfied, including without limitation that (a) the Hong Kong project must be the beneficial owner of the relevant dividends; and (b) the Hong Kong project must directly hold no less than 25% share ownership in the PRC project during the 12 consecutive months preceding its receipt of the dividends. In current practice, a Hong Kong project must obtain a tax resident certificate from the Hong Kong tax authority to apply for the 5% lower PRC withholding tax rate. As the Hong Kong tax authority will issue such a tax resident certificate on a case-by-case basis, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the tax resident certificate from the relevant Hong Kong tax authority and enjoy the preferential withholding tax rate of 5% under the Double Taxation Arrangement with respect to dividends to be paid by our PRC subsidiary to its immediate holding company, Juxing HK. As of the date of this annual report, we have not applied for the tax resident certificate from the relevant Hong Kong tax authority. Juxing HK intends to apply for the tax resident certificate when the Pengze WFOE plans to declare and pay dividends to Juxing HK. See “Item 3.D. Key Information—Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Doing Business in China — There are significant uncertainties under the EIT Law relating to the withholding tax liabilities of our PRC subsidiary, and dividends payable by our PRC subsidiary to our offshore subsidiaries may not qualify to enjoy certain treaty benefits.”

Further, the proceeds from our offshore offerings may be sent back from the holding company to the PRC, and the process for sending such proceeds back to the PRC may be time-consuming. We may be unable to use these proceeds to grow the business of the PRC operating entities until the PRC operating entities receive such proceeds in the PRC. Any transfer of funds by the holding company to the PRC operating entities, either as a shareholder loan or as an increase in registered capital, are subject to registration, filing with or report to relevant governmental authorities in China. Any foreign loans procured by the PRC operating entities is required to be registered with China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) in its local branches and satisfy relevant requirements, and the PRC operating entities may not procure loans which exceed the difference between their respective total project investment amount and registered capital or 3.5 times (which may be varied year by year due to the change of PRC’s national macro-control policy) of the net worth of our PRC subsidiary. According to the relevant PRC regulations on foreign-invested enterprises in China, capital contributions to the Pengze WFOE are subject to the registration with State Administration for Market Regulation in its local branches, report submission to the Ministry of Commerce in its local branches and registration with a local bank authorized by SAFE.

Financial Information Related to the VIE

The tables below are condensed consolidating schedules summarizing separately the operations, financial position and cash flows of Baiya (“Parent” in the tables below), Ruifeng BVI and Juxing HK (“Subsidiaries” in the tables below that is exclusive of Pengze WFOE), Pengze WFOE (“WFOE” in the tables below), Gongwuyuan and its subsidiaries (“VIE and Subsidiaries” in the table below), as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.

Condensed Consolidating Schedule of Results of Operations

Condensed Consolidating Schedule of Financial Position

Condensed Consolidating Schedule of Cash Flows

A. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

B. Capitalization and indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk factors

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this Report, including the matters addressed under the headings “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, and the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained herein, you should carefully consider the following risk factors presented in this Report. The risks associated with our company are discussed below, and many of these risks may have various ramifications. Therefore, the information below should be viewed as a starting point for understanding the significant risks relating to our company, and not as a limitation on the potential impact of the matters discussed. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could also be harmed by risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Unless otherwise indicated, references to business being harmed in these risk factors include harm to our business, reputation, brand, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Summary of Risk Factors

The following summary description sets forth an overview of the material risks we are exposed to in the normal course of our business activities. The summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full risk factor discussion immediately following this summary description. We encourage you to read the full risk factor discussion carefully. The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in this section, alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

Risks Relating to the Variable Interest Entity (VIE) Structure

Risks Relating to Doing Business in China

Risks Relating to the Class A Ordinary Shares

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

Our PRC operating entities operate in the emerging, dynamic, and competitive flexible employment industry, which makes it difficult for investors to evaluate our PRC operating entities’ future prospects, and we cannot assure you that their current or future strategies will be successfully implemented or will generate sustainable profit.

We primarily operate in China’s flexible employment industry through our PRC operating entities. The flexible employment industry is relatively new and rapidly evolving, business models continue to evolve, and the industry may not develop as we anticipate. The regulatory framework in China governing the flexible employment industry is also developing and may remain uncertain in the near future. As our PRC operating entities’ business develops and in response to the evolving client needs and market competition, our PRC operating entities need to continuously introduce new services, improve their existing services, or adjust and optimize their business model. In response to new regulatory requirements or industry standards, or in connection with the introduction of new services, our PRC operating entities may need to impose more rigorous risk management systems and policies, which may negatively affect manage the PRC operating entities’ the growth of their business. Any significant change to our PRC operating entities’ business model may not achieve expected results and may materially and adversely affect their financial condition and results of operations. It is therefore difficult to accurately predict the PRC operating entities’ future prospects.

You should consider the PRC operating entities’ business and prospects in light of the risks and challenges that they encounter or may encounter as an entrant in the newly emerging and rapidly evolving market in which they operate and their limited operating history. These risks and challenges include the PRC operating entities’ ability to, among other things:

If the PRC operating entities fail to address any or all of these risks and challenges, if the PRC operating entities fail to educate business partners and clients about the value of their platform and services, if the market for their products and services does not develop as they expect, if they fail to address the needs of their target clients, or if they are not able to effectively tackle other risks and challenges that they may encounter, the PRC operating entities’ business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We have a limited operating history and are subject to the risks encountered by development-stage companies. We cannot assure you that the market for our services will develop as we expect or we will be able to maintain the growth rate that they have experienced to date.

We provide our services in the flexible employment industry through our PRC operating entities. We originally provided job matching services via traditional methods beginning in 2017, and have since launched our online Gongwuyuan Platform and expanded our services to include entrusted recruitment, project outsourcing, labor dispatch (labor dispatching service was discontinued in 2023), and others, and have achieved rapid growth in terms of client base and revenue. However, the PRC operating entities’ limited operating history in the flexible employment industry may not be indicative of their future growth or financial results. There is no assurance that the PRC operating entities will be able to maintain their historical growth rates in future periods. The PRC operating entities’ growth prospects should be considered in light of the risks and uncertainties that fast-growing companies with a limited operating history and experience in their industry may encounter, including, among others, risks and uncertainties regarding the PRC operating entities’ ability to:

All of these endeavors involve risks and will require significant allocation of management and employee resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively manage our growth or implement our business strategies effectively. If the market for our services does not develop as expected or if we fail to address the needs of the flexible employment industry, our business, results of operations, and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.

The proper functioning of our Gongwuyuan platform and its technology infrastructure is essential to our business. Any errors in or disruption to the PRC operating entities’ IT systems and infrastructure and those on which they rely could materially affect their ability to maintain the satisfactory performance of their platform and deliver consistent services to their clients.

To grow our business, we are dependent on the ability of the IT systems of our PRC operating entities. The reliability, availability and satisfactory performance of these IT systems are critical to our success, our ability to attract and retain clients and their ability to maintain a satisfactory user experience and client service. The PRC operating entities’ servers may be vulnerable to computer viruses, traffic spike that exceeds the capacity of the PRC operating entities’ or their servers, electricity power interruptions, physical or electronic break-ins, and similar disruptions, which could lead to system interruptions, website slowdown and unavailability, delays in transaction processing, loss of data, and the inability to accept and fulfill client orders.

The software, hardware, and systems and those on which our PRC operating entities and our Gongwuyuan Platform rely upon may contain undetected errors that could have a material adverse effect on our business, particularly to the extent such errors are not detected and remedied quickly. Since clients use the PRC operating entities’ services for important aspects of their businesses, any errors, defects, disruptions in services, or other performance problems with the PRC operating entities’ services could hurt their reputation and damage their clients’ businesses. Software and system errors, or human error, could delay or inhibit posting of jobs or prevent the PRC operating entities from collecting transaction fees. We can provide no assurance that these systems will not experience unexpected human errors, system errors or interruptions in the future, or that their current security mechanisms will be sufficient to protect their IT systems and technology infrastructure from any third-party intrusions, electricity power interruptions, viruses and hacker attacks, information and data theft, and other similar activities. Any such future occurrences could damage their reputation and result in a material decrease in our operations and revenue.

Maintaining and upgrading the technology infrastructure on which we rely upon, especially our Gongwuyuan Platform, require significant investment of time and resources, including adding new hardware, updating software, and recruiting and training new engineering personnel. During updates, our Gongwuyuan Platform and other systems may experience interruptions, and the new technologies and infrastructures may not be fully integrated with the existing systems timely, or at all. Any failure to maintain and improve the technology infrastructure on which we and our Gongwuyuan Platform rely upon could result in unanticipated system disruptions, slower response times, impaired quality of user experience and delays in reporting accurate operating and financial information, which, in turn, could materially and adversely affect the PRC operating entities’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because the PRC operating entities face significant competition in all of their businesses, they may lose market share and our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our PRC operating entities face significant competition in all of their businesses. We face competition from traditional recruitment companies such as Career International, ManpowerGroup and Renrui Human Resources, platform based human resource service providers, and other crowdsourcing recruitment and HR management service providers in the flexible employment marketplace, including certain crowdsourcing recruiting companies that are also focused on blue-collar workers in China.

Some of these competitors have a longer operating history, strategic partnerships, and significantly greater financial resources, and may have greater financial, management, technological development, sales, marketing and other resources than we do, and in turn, may be able to attract and retain more clients, operate at a lower cost, and establish larger cooperative partnerships due to company scale. They may also be able to adopt our business model and intensify competition. As a result, we may experience reduced margins, loss of market share or decreased usage of our services by Customers, Employing Companies and HR Service Companies. We cannot assure you that existing or future competitors will not develop or offer services and products which provide significant performance, price, creative, technological or other advantages over the PRC operating entities’ services. If the PRC operating entities are unable to compete effectively with current or future competitors as a result of these or other factors, the PRC operating entities’ market share and their results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

New competitors face low entry barriers to flexible employment industry, and successful entry by new competitors may cause us to lose market share and materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

We face competition from new entrants in the flexible employment industry, especially in areas such as recruitment crowdsourcing, HR management services and other human resource related services industries where our PRC operating entities primarily operate. The PRC operating entities may face increased competition from companies focusing on flexible employment, dedicated human resource service providers, crowdsourcing companies, and other such recruitment companies focusing their services towards blue-collar workers. The PRC operating entities’ businesses are characterized by relatively low start-up and fixed costs, modest capital requirements, and short start-up lead times. As a result, potential market entrants face relatively low barriers to entry to all of our service markets, and could acquire significant numbers of clients, including corporate customers and human resource service providers, within a relatively short period of time. Increased competition could result in a loss of market share and revenues, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If the use of our Gongwuyuan Platform for our recruitment and human resource services do not grow in market acceptance, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

The business success of our PRC operating entities, in a large part, depends on the adoption and use of our Gongwuyuan Platform to provide their services to Customers, Employing Companies, HR Service Companies and blue-collar workers in China. The PRC operating entities face challenges in promoting adoption and usage of the Gongwuyuan Platform, which involves, among other things, how business enterprises, human resource and labor companies connect and interact regarding human resources, standardization of employment processes and human resource management structures, and the promotion of career development and improvement of welfare benefits for blue-collar workers. Even though the use of online platforms, such as our Gongwuyuan Platform, has become more prevalent in China, the use of such online platforms as a medium for flexible employment has a limited history. As such, if there are any negative perceptions as to the effectiveness of the Gongwuyuan Platform and the services available, or any significant failure of the Gongwuyuan Platform to gain broader acceptance and trust as a reliable medium, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The PRC operating entities rely on cooperation with third party companies for aspects of their business, which could result in disruption, increased costs, reputation risks and may adversely affect their business and results of operations.

The PRC operating entities are reliant on third party vendors for their business operations, such as partnerships with human resource companies in connection with job matching services, entrusted recruitment services and project outsourcing services, and cooperation with third party companies for various ongoing technical support of our Gongwuyuan Platform. This reliance exposes the PRC operating entities to other risks, including increased costs, supply chain interruptions, potential disruptions to our business operations and reputational risk. However, there can be no assurance that the PRC operating entities’ arrangements with these companies will be extended or renewed after their respective expiration or that the PRC operating entities will be able to extend or renew such arrangements on terms and conditions favorable to them. While we believe that these third-party companies provide greater efficiency and are imperative to the services that the PRC operating entities provide, our dependence on these third-party companies increases the risk that the PRC operating entities’ business and operations will be adversely affected if we are unable to timely provide our services through our third-party companies consistent with the needs of our clients. Similarly, the PRC operating entities’ profit margins could be adversely affected a third-party company needed to be replaced for performance or economic issues.

The PRC operating entities’ operations also depend significantly upon the ability of these third party companies to protect client and worker data. While the PRC operating entities have implemented security measures during use of the Gongwuyuan Platform, we cannot guarantee that the third-party companies have implemented the same. The loss and/or theft of confidential, personally identifiable, or other sensitive data, including data about our clients, workers and/or associates, or the PRC operating entities’ human resources operations, or our human resources operations, could damage our reputation in the market, and our business and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

Our Gongwuyuan Platform may rely on third parties for elements of the payment processing infrastructure underlying our platform. If these third-party elements become unavailable or unavailable on favorable terms, our business could be adversely affected.

As we continue to develop our platform to support relevant payment needs, Gongwuyuan Platform may rely on third parties payment providers for elements of our payment-processing infrastructure to support relevant payment needs such as wage payments from Employing Company to workers, and these third parties may refuse to enter or renew contracts with them on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If these companies become unwilling or unable to provide these services to us on acceptable terms or at all, our business may be disrupted.

The PRC operating entities are subject to potential legal liability from both employers and individual workers arising from disputes regarding recruitment process and employment relationships.

The PRC operating entities are exposed to potential claims associated with the recruitment process, including claims by clients seeking to hold the PRC operating entities liable for failures to properly fulfil contractual obligations to meet their employment and labor needs, claims by either employers and workers seeking damages due to failures of certain features made or to be made available on our Gongwuyuan Platform, or other such proceedings, investigations and claims incidental to the conduct of our crowdsourcing recruitment services. Any such claims, regardless of merit, may force us to participate in time-consuming, costly litigation or investigation, divert significant management and staff attention, and damage our reputation and brand names. The PRC operating entities do not maintain insurance coverage for liabilities arising from claims by employers, employees, candidates or third parties.

Our customers may raise objection to and claim for compensation for the outsourcing arrangement carried out by the PRC operating companies in completing relevant worker recruitment or labor assignments which could have a material adverse effect on our business operation and financial conditions.

In completing relevant worker recruitment or labor assignments for customers, the PRC operating entities may outsource the labor assignments to HR service companies or entrust/cooperate with HR service companies to recruit the required workers in their business operation. While the PRC operating entities believe most of the customers will not have any objection with this type of outsourcing arrangement, if any, there are no explicit provisions in the contracts between the PRC operating entities and the customers permitting such outsourcing arrangement. In the event that the customers raise objection to the outsourcing arrangement or claim for compensation against the PRC operating entities due to breach of contract or other reasons, we may not be able to complete the worker recruitment or labor assignments by ourselves on a timely basis or at all, and we may have to make compensation for our customers, the business cooperation between the customers and us may be interrupted or terminated, which could have a material adverse effect on our business operation and financial conditions.

Due to seasonal variations in demand for blue-collar workers and human resource related services, the PRC operating entities experience material fluctuations in their revenue streams which affect their ability to predict their quarterly results and which may also cause quarterly results to vary from period to period.

The PRC operating entities experience material fluctuations in their revenue streams which affect their ability to predict quarterly results. For example, in the period following the Chinese New Year holiday in the first quarter, the PRC operating entities’ industry historically experiences an increase in recruitment activity. During this peak period, demand for online recruitment and other human resource related services may or may not rise significantly depending on the needs of employers as well as their perceptions of the job market. In addition, the Chinese New Year holiday is based on the lunar calendar, which varies from year to year and affects the PRC operating entities’ first and second quarter results as well as their comparability to financial results of the same quarters in prior years. Due to these factors, the PRC operating entities’ revenues may vary materially from quarter to quarter and quarterly results may not be comparable to the corresponding periods of prior years. Such uncertainty makes it difficult for the PRC operating entities to predict revenues for a particular quarter. Therefore, actual results may differ significantly from the PRC operating entities’ targets or estimated quarterly results, which could negatively affect our cash flow for such periods.

If we are not able to respond successfully to technological or industry developments, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

The use of online platforms for crowdsourcing recruitment services is characterized by rapid technological developments, frequent launches of new products and services, introductions of new business models, changes in customer needs and behavior, and evolving industry standards. If we fail to adapt our Gongwuyuan Platform to these developments, our PRC operating entities’ recruitment services may become less competitive or obsolete. For example, the number of people accessing the Internet through mobile devices, including smartphones, tablets and other hand-held devices, has increased in recent years, and the PRC operating entities expect this trend to continue as 5G and more advanced mobile communications technologies are broadly implemented. As our Gongwuyuan Platform is available across a variety of mobile operating systems and devices, we are dependent on the interoperability of their services with popular mobile devices and mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Android and iOS. Any changes in such mobile operating systems or devices that degrade the functionality of the PRC operating entities’ services or give preferential treatment to competitive services could adversely affect usage of their services. In order to respond to new developments, we may be required to undertake substantial efforts and incur significant costs to ensure that our Gongwuyuan Platform is up-to-date with the latest technological developments. In the event that we do not successfully respond to such developments in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

If we or our PRC operating entities are unable to protect or promote our brand names and reputation, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

If we fail to successfully develop and enhance the perception of the our Gongwuyuan Platform as a leading crowdsourcing recruitment platform, undertake effective marketing and promotional activities, maintain cooperation and partnerships with human resources and recruitment companies, outsourcing companies and regional businesses, and generally provide high quality services, we or our PRC operating entities may not be successful in protecting or promoting our brand names and reputation in a cost-effective manner or at all. In addition, if job seeker profiles or recruitment advertisements on the Gongwuyuan Platform are found to contain inaccurate or false information, the value proposition of the use of our Gongwuyuan Platform as a leading online crowdsourcing recruitment platform in a developing industry may be weakened. Furthermore, the PRC operating entities may be subject to claims by its users seeking to hold them liable for such inaccurate or false information. Any claims, regardless of merit, may force the PRC operating entities to participate in time-consuming, costly litigation or investigation, divert significant management and staff attention, and damage the PRC operating entities’ reputation and brand names. The PRC operating entities may dedicate significantly greater resources in the future to advertising, marketing and other promotional efforts aimed at building awareness of the PRC operating entities’ brand names. Any significant damage to the PRC operating entities’ reputation, the perceived quality or awareness of the PRC operating entities’ brand names or services, or any significant failure on the PRC operating entities’ part to promote and protect their brand names and reputation could make it more difficult for them to successfully attract job seekers, compete for customers or retain qualified personnel, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Negative publicity and allegations involving us, the PRC operating entities, the PRC operating entities’ shareholders, directors, officers, employees and business partners may affect our reputation and, as a result, our business may be negatively affected.

The PRC operating entities, the PRC operating entities’ shareholders, directors, officers, employees and business partners may be subject to negative media coverage and publicity from time to time. Such negative coverage and publicity could threaten the perception of the PRC operating entities’ brand names and damage their reputation. In addition, to the extent the PRC operating entities’ employees and business partners are subject to allegations of non-compliance, regardless of merit, with any relevant laws or regulations, the PRC operating entities may also suffer negative publicity or harm to their reputation. As a result, the PRC operating entities may be required to spend significant time and incur substantial costs in response to allegations and negative publicity, which could adversely affect our business and operational costs.

The PRC operating entities are dependent on their Internet service providers, and the PRC operating entities are vulnerable to failures of the Internet, telecommunications networks in China and the PRC operating entities’ technology platform.

The PRC operating entities’ online businesses, including the development of the Gongwuyuan Platform, are relying on the performance and reliability of China’s Internet infrastructure, the continual accessibility of bandwidth and servers to the PRC operating entities’ service providers’ networks, and the continuing performance, reliability and availability of the PRC operating entities’ technology platform. The PRC operating entities cannot assure you that the Internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China will be able to support the increased demands associated with the continued growth in Internet usage.

Almost all access to the Internet is maintained through state-owned telecommunications operators under the administrative control and regulatory supervision of the MIIT. In addition, the national networks in China connect to the Internet through a government-controlled international gateway. This international gateway is the only channel through which a domestic user can connect to the international Internet network.

The PRC operating entities rely on a limited number of telecommunications service providers to provide them with data communications capacity through local telecommunications lines and data centers to host the PRC operating entities’ servers. The PRC operating entities are unlikely to have any access to alternative networks or services in the event of disruptions, failures or other problems with China’s Internet infrastructure or telecommunications networks. In addition, the PRC operating entities have no control over the costs of the services provided by the telecommunications service providers. If they fail to provide these services, the PRC operating entities would be required to seek other providers, and there is no assurance that the PRC operating entities will be able to find alternative providers willing or able to provide high quality services and there is no assurance that such providers will not charge them higher prices for their services. If the prices that the PRC operating entities are required to pay for Internet services rise significantly, the PRC operating entities’ results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business generates and processes a large amount of data, and the improper use or disclosure of such data could harm our reputation as well as have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

Our Gongwuyuan Platform generates and processes a large quantity of business, financial, personal and transaction data. We face risks inherent in handling large volumes of data and in protecting the security of such data. In particular, we face a number of challenges relating to data from transactions and other activities on our platform, including:

Any systems failure or security breach or lapse that results in the release of user data could harm our reputation and brand and, consequently, our business, in addition to exposing us to potential legal liability.

The PRC operating entities rely heavily on their information systems, and any failure to properly protect privacy and to maintain and secure the PRC operating entities’ systems could seriously damage the PRC operating entities’ reputation, disrupt the PRC operating entities’ operations and harm their business.

The Internet industry is facing significant challenges regarding information security and privacy. As the use of the Internet grows in everyday life, the general public is increasingly aware of the vulnerability of confidential and private information. Certain data and services collected, provided or used by the PRC operating entities in their systems or provided to and used by them, the PRC operating entities’ partners, the PRC operating entities’ customers or their job seekers contain confidential and private information, such as names, user IDs and passwords and payment or transaction related information. The PRC operating entities’ ability to store, retrieve, process, manage and protect substantial amounts of data and information, including the PRC operating entities’ client and candidate databases, is an important part of the PRC operating entities’ operations and a critical component of their success.

In recent years, PRC government authorities have enacted legislation on Internet use to protect personal information from unauthorized disclosure. In December 2012 and July 2013, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress and the MIIT issued new laws and regulations to enhance the legal protection of information security and privacy on the Internet, and also require Internet operators to take measures to ensure confidentiality of user information. The PRC Counter-Terrorism Law, which became effective on January 1, 2016 and amended in April 2018, requires Internet service providers to prevent the dissemination of information containing terrorist or extremist content and conduct identity verification of individuals. The PRC Cyber Security Law, which became effective on June 1, 2017, requires, among others, that network operators take security measures to protect the network from unauthorized interference, damage and unauthorized access and prevent data from being divulged, stolen or tampered with. Network operators are also required to collect and use personal information in compliance with the principles of legitimacy, properness and necessity, and strictly within the scope of authorization by the subject of personal information unless otherwise prescribed by laws or regulations. In May 2020, the PRC Civil Code, which became effective on January 1, 2021, was promulgated and also provides specific provisions regarding the protection of personal information. On August 20, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC (the “PIPL”), which became effective on November 1, 2021, to regulate activities of processing of personal information and promote a reasonable use of personal information. On September 24, 2024, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on the Network Data Security Management (the “Data Security Management Regulations”), which became effective on January 1, 2025. The Data Security Management Regulations clarifies the rules for processing personal information and the specific provisions that must be followed, requiring network data processors to provide convenient methods and channels to support individuals in exercising their rights, and not to set unreasonable conditions that limit individuals’ reasonable requests. At the same time, it specifies the protection obligations for collecting personal information using automated collection techniques, and refines the implementation pathways for personal information transfer requests. However, the interpretation and application of such laws in China are often uncertain and in flux. On October 28, 2025, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress adopted amendments to the Cybersecurity Law, which took effect on January 1, 2026. The revisions align the legal liability for personal information processing with the PIPL and other applicable laws, ensuring that breaches of personal data are subject to a cohesive legal framework. Furthermore, the amendments introduce a tiered penalty system: for violations with particularly serious consequences, companies may face fines of up to RMB10 million, and responsible individuals may face fines of up to RMB1 million. The amendments also expand the extraterritorial application of the Cybersecurity Law to cover overseas activities that endanger China’s cybersecurity. These developments indicate a continued regulatory focus on data protection and could impact our compliance costs and operational procedures, particularly concerning customer data handling and the potential designation of core business systems as critical information infrastructure. On September 11, 2025, the Cyberspace Administration of China promulgated the Measures for the Administration of National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting, which took effect on November 1, 2025. These measures require that network operators engaged in network construction, operation, or network-based service provision within the territory of the People’s Republic of China shall report cybersecurity incidents in accordance with the provisions thereof once such incidents occur. In particular, for cybersecurity incidents at or above the “relatively significant level”, network operators shall promptly report to the local provincial-level cyberspace administration department, and in any event, such reporting shall not be delayed for more than four hours.

In addition, on December 18, 2020, the PRC Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, or the MOHRSS, issued the Regulations on the Administration of Online Recruitment Services, which became effective on March 1, 2021. These regulations require human resource service organizations engaged in online recruitment services to comply with the cybersecurity protection obligations requested by PRC laws and regulations, and adopt technical or other necessary measures to ensure the network, information system and user information security of recruitment services. At the same time, such regulations require human resource service organizations to comply with personal information protection obligations requested by PRC laws and regulations when collecting and using users’ personal information, and to establish user information protection systems for online recruitment service.

While the PRC operating entities have adopted measures and strive to comply with relevant data protection laws and regulations, any failure or perceived failure to comply may result in proceedings or actions against the PRC operating entities by government agencies or others, and could damage the PRC operating entities’ reputation. The PRC operating entities cannot guarantee the effectiveness of the measures they have undertaken, and such measures may still be determined as insufficient, improper or deficient by relevant authorities. Concerns about the PRC operating entities’ practices and systems with regard to the collection, use, disclosure, or security of personal information or other privacy related matters, and any negative publicity on the PRC operating entities’ information safety or privacy protection mechanism and policy, even if unfounded, could harm the PRC operating entities’ business. Any damage to the PRC operating entities’ reputation and brand names may adversely impact the size, engagement and loyalty of the PRC operating entities’ job seekers and employers, which could materially and adversely affect the PRC operating entities’ financial condition and results of operations. The PRC operating entities must further develop and enhance their information systems to compete effectively and ensure their compliance with relevant laws and regulations, which may require significant staff and financial resources. If the PRC operating entities’ online platforms are not properly maintained and secured, the PRC operating entities’ operations could be seriously disrupted and their business significantly harmed.

If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively and our business, financial condition, and results of operation may be materially and adversely affected.

Our success depends on our ability to keep pace with rapid technological changes in the development and implementation of our services and HR SaaS solutions. Additionally, our Gongwuyuan Platform is reliant on a variety of technologies, including those which support our “Yun Dan Bao” transaction system, intelligent HR management, payroll, and client data analytics. We face fierce competition for qualified personnel to continue the development of our Gongwuyuan Platform and improve our business and human resource services. If we are not able to compete effectively for highly qualified personnel or attract and retain top talent at reasonable costs, our technology development capabilities would be materially and adversely impacted. If we are unable to continue development of our Gongwuyuan Platform and to continue evolving our technologies in pace with industry developments, it could have a negative effect on our services and HR SaaS solutions and our ability to develop and maintain a competitive advantage, and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our future success also depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified management personnel. Expansion of our business and our management will require additional managers and employees with industry experience, and our success will be highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel and other employees. We may not be able to attract or retain highly qualified personnel as competition for skilled management personnel is significant in China. This competition may make it more difficult and expensive to attract, hire and retain qualified managers and employees.

The PRC operating entities operate in an evolving market, and the PRC operating entities’ business and results of operations may suffer if they do not successfully manage their growth.

The PRC operating entities operate in a rapidly evolving market. While the PRC operating entities have grown significantly since their commenced operations in 2017, the PRC operating entities intend to continue to expand in size and increase the number of services they provide. The PRC operating entities’ success in managing this growth will depend to a significant degree on the ability of the members of their senior management to operate effectively both independently and as a group.

As a growing company, the PRC operating entities may encounter risks and difficulties including their potential failure to:

Although the PRC operating entities have achieved profitability for a period of time, the PRC operating entities expect that their ongoing expansion will increase their operating expenses. In addition, new business initiatives may expose the PRC operating entities to new challenges and uncertainties. The PRC operating entities’ historical results of operations should not be taken as indicative of the rate of growth, if any, or the level of profitability, if any, that can be expected in the future. If the PRC operating entities do not successfully manage their growth, the PRC operating entities’ business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

If the PRC operating entities are unable to prevent others from using their intellectual property, the PRC operating entities’ business may be materially and adversely affected.

The PRC operating entities’ intellectual property may be subject to various forms of theft and misappropriation. Competitors may copy and distribute content from the PRC operating entities’ platforms and from the training materials that they use, and utilize misleadingly similar Internet domain names and URLs in an effort to divert Internet traffic away from the PRC operating entities’ websites. The PRC operating entities are also susceptible to others copying their business model and methods. The legal protection of trademarks, trade names, copyrighted material, domain names, trade secrets, know-how and other forms of intellectual property in the PRC is still developing and may afford the PRC operating entities little or no effective protection sometimes. Preventing unauthorized use of the PRC operating entities’ intellectual property is difficult, time consuming and expensive. Misappropriation of the PRC operating entities’ content, trademarks and other intellectual property could divert significant business to the PRC operating entities’ competitors, damage the PRC operating entities’ brand names and reputation, and require the PRC operating entities to initiate litigation that could be expensive and divert management resources from the operation of their businesses.

The PRC operating entities may be subject to liability for placing advertisements with content that is deemed inappropriate.

PRC laws and regulations, such as the PRC Advertising Law which became effective on February 1, 1995 and its amendment which became effective on April 29, 2021, the Measures for the Administration of Online Advertising promulgated the PRC State Administration for Market Regulation, or the SAMR, which became effective on May 1, 2023, the Circular on Launching a Special Program to Rectify Internet Advertisements, which was issued on February 9, 2018, and the PRC E-Commerce Law, which became effective on January 1, 2019, prohibit advertising companies from producing, distributing or publishing any advertisement that contains any content that violates laws and regulations, impairs the national dignity of the PRC, infringes upon personal and property safety, discloses privacy or state secrets, harms the physical and mental health of minors or the disabled, involves designs of the national flag, national emblem or national anthem or the music of the national anthem of the PRC, is reactionary, obscene, superstitious or absurd, is fraudulent, or disparages similar products. An Internet advertisement shall be identifiable and clearly identified as an “advertisement” so that consumers can tell it is an advertisement. Paid search advertisements shall be clearly distinguished from natural search results. Advertisements shall be published or distributed by means of the Internet without affecting the normal use of the network by users. Advertisements published on Internet pages in the form of pop-up or other forms shall be clearly marked with a “Close” sign to ensure a “Click to Close”. If the PRC operating entities are deemed to be in violation of such laws and regulations, the PRC operating entities may be subject to penalties including confiscation of the illegal revenues, levying of fines and suspension or revocation of the PRC operating entities’ business license, any of which may materially and adversely affect the PRC operating entities’ business.

Hacking and computer viruses may cause delays or interruptions on the PRC operating entities’ systems and may reduce use of their services and damage their reputation and brand names.

Hacking and computer viruses may cause delays or other service interruptions on the PRC operating entities’ systems. Hacking involves efforts to gain unauthorized access to information or systems or to cause intentional malfunctions, loss or corruption of data, software, hardware or other computer equipment. In addition, the inadvertent transmission of computer viruses could expose the PRC operating entities to a material risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. Hacking and computer viruses could result in significant damage to the PRC operating entities’ hardware and software systems and databases, disruptions to the PRC operating entities’ business activities, including to the PRC operating entities’ e-mail and other communications systems, breaches of security and the inadvertent disclosure of confidential or sensitive information, interruptions in access to the PRC operating entities’ websites through the use of “denial of service” or similar attacks, and other material adverse effects on the PRC operating entities’ operations. Although to date the PRC operating entities have not been subject to significant targeted disruptions or hacking, the PRC operating entities may incur significant costs to continue to protect their systems and equipment against the threat of, and to repair any damage caused by, hacking and computer viruses. Moreover, if hacking or a computer virus affects the PRC operating entities’ systems and is highly publicized, the PRC operating entities’ reputation and brand names could be materially damaged and use of their services may decrease.

The considerable uncertainty in Chinese economic growth could hurt demand of the service products of the PRC operating entities.

While China has grown significantly over the past two decades, the growth rate may decrease due to uncertainties with respect to national structural control along with other factors. If China’s growth rate slows, or even declines, demand for the services of the PRC operating entities might be accordingly decreased. Therefore, the business of the PRC operating entities might be adversely affected by the slowdown in the economic conditions, which would negatively affect sales of their products, operations of our company and our financial condition.

Our reliance on a limited number of major customers and service providers exposes us to concentration risk, and the loss of, or adverse changes in relationships with, these counterparties could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our revenues and payables are concentrated among a limited number of customers and service providers, which increases our exposure to changes in their business conditions, payment practices, pricing decisions, and operational capacity. We consider major customers in each period to be those accounting for more than 10% of our revenue. The PRC operating entities had five major customers, Guangdong Yingwang Industrial Investment Co., Ltd., Nanchang Jiesite Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., China Postal Express & Logistics Co., Ltd — Zhaoqing Branch, China Post Group Co., Ltd — Zhaoqing Branch and Zhaoqing Runzhongyi Logistics Services Co., Ltd., who accounted for approximately $2,904,325, or 18%, $2,377,241, or 14%, $2,187,211, or 13%, $1,871,530, or 11% and $1,780,642, or 11%, respectively, of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025. The PRC operating entities had four major customers, China Post Group Co., Ltd — Zhaoqing Branch, Nanchang Jiesite Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., China Post Group Co., Ltd — Zhaoqing Branch, Guangdong Yingwang Industrial Investment Co., Ltd. and China Post Group Co., Ltd — Zhongshan Branch, who accounted for approximately $4,393,353, or 34%, $3,055,082 or 24%, $2,542,167, or 20% and $1,479,155 or 12%, respectively, of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024. The PRC operating entities had three major customers, Nanchang Jiesite Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., China Post Group Co., Ltd and Guangdong Yingwang Industrial Investment Co., Ltd., who accounted for approximately $5,070,838, or 44%, $2,006,486 or 17%, and $1,277,408, or 11% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Our purchases of services are also concentrated among a limited number of service providers. During the year ended December 31, 2025, four major service providers accounted for approximately 16%, 15%, 10% and 10% of our total purchase of services, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2024, three major service providers accounted for approximately 25%, 14% and 13% of our total purchase of services, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2023, three major service providers accounted for approximately 49%, 25% and 13% of our total purchase of services, respectively.

Although we believe our relationships with major customers are stable, many of these relationships are relatively new and may not be governed by long-term contracts. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or strengthen these relationships or replace major customers with others of equivalent value. If any significant customer reduces demand, delays payment, disputes invoices, or terminates its relationship with us, our revenues, cash flows, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. Similarly, if any significant service provider increases prices, reduces service quality, experiences operational or financial difficulties, or ceases doing business with us, our costs and ability to deliver services could be adversely impacted. The concentration of accounts payable among a limited number of service providers further heightens our exposure to disruptions in these relationships.

Accordingly, any loss of, or other adverse change in, our relationships with one or more significant customers or service providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

During any growth, the PRC operating entities may encounter problems related to their operational and financial systems and controls, including quality control and delivery and production capacities.

Any significant growth in the market for the services of the PRC operating entities or their entry into new markets may require additional employees for managerial, operational, financial and other purposes. Our PRC operating entities would also need to continue to expand, train and manage their employees. Continued future growth will impose significant added responsibilities upon their management to identify, recruit, maintain, integrate, and motivate new employees.

We cannot assure you that the internal growth strategy of the PRC operating entities will be successful, which may result in a negative impact on our growth, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

One of the strategies of the PRC operating entities is to grow internally through increasing the development of new services and improving the quality of existing services. However, many obstacles to this expansion exist, including, but not limited to, increased competition from similar businesses, the PRC operating entities’ ability to improve their services to realize the benefits of their research and development efforts, new PRC regulations related to the flexible employment market, unexpected costs, and costs associated with marketing efforts. We cannot, therefore, assure you that the PRC operating entities will be able to successfully overcome such obstacles and establish their services in any additional markets. The inability of the PRC operating entities to implement this internal growth strategy successfully may have a negative impact on our growth, future financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our significant shareholders may have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Because our significant shareholders have, either collectively or individually, considerable influence over our corporate matters, their interests may differ from the interests of our company as a whole. These shareholders could, for example, appoint directors and management without the requisite experience, relations or knowledge to steer our company properly because of their affiliations or loyalty, and such actions may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition. Currently, we do not have any arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these shareholders and our company. If we cannot resolve any conflict of interest or dispute between us and the shareholders, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which could disrupt our business and subject us to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

The business of the PRC operating entities depends on the continued efforts of their senior management. If one or more of the key executives of the PRC operating entities were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, the business of senior management may be severely disrupted.

The business operations of the PRC operating entities depend on the continued services of their senior management, particularly the executive officers named in this annual report. While the PRC operating entities have provided different incentives to their management, we cannot assure you that the PRC operating entities can continue to retain their services. If one or more of their key executives were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, the PRC operating entities may not be able to replace them easily, or at all, their future growth may be constrained, their business may be severely disrupted and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected, and the PRC operating entities may incur additional expenses to recruit, train and retain qualified personnel. In addition, although the PRC operating entities have entered into confidentiality and non-competition agreements with their management, there is no assurance that any member of their management team will not join the competitors of the PRC operating entities or form a competing business. If any dispute arises between the PRC operating entities and their current or former officers, the PRC operating entities may have to incur substantial costs and expenses in order to enforce such agreements in China or the PRC operating entities may be unable to enforce them at all.

The business of the PRC operating entities could be materially harmed by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic. In 2020, many businesses and social activities around the world were severely disrupted. The pandemic also caused market panic, which had a substantial negative impact on the global financial markets. The operations, especially international orders, of the PRC operating entities were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, the emergence of COVID-19 variants, including the Delta variant and subsequently the Omicron variant and its subvariants—which are known to be more transmissible—has introduced additional uncertainty., as well as the effects of any new variants and subvariants which may develop, which may have impacts on the business, operation, and financial conditions of the PRC operating entities is uncertain.

Potential impact to our results of operations will also depend on numerous constantly changing factors, almost all of which are beyond our control.

Due to the high uncertainty of the evolving situation, we have limited visibility on the full impact brought upon by the COVID-19 pandemic and the financial impact related to the outbreak of and response to the coronavirus cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

Our financial and operating performance may be adversely affected by epidemics, natural disasters and other catastrophes.

The business of the PRC operating entities could be materially and adversely affected by the outbreak of epidemics including but not limited to the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19), swine influenza, avian influenza, middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV). Our financial and operating performance have been adversely affected by novel coronavirus (COVID-19), natural disasters and other catastrophes, which may affect the demand for human resources services and labor services within the industries that we service, as well as our anticipated expansion and operational plans. What may further impact our business and financial performance will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and largely beyond our control. There is no assurance that we will be able to adjust our business operations to adapt to these changes and the increasingly complex environment in which we operate.

Any prolonged restrictive measures in order to control the contagious disease or other adverse public health developments in China or our targeted markets may have a material and adverse effect on the PRC operating entities’ business operations.

Similarly, natural disasters, wars (including the potential of war), terrorist activity (including threats of terrorist activity), social unrest and heightened travel security measures instituted in response, and travel-related accidents, as well as geopolitical uncertainty and international conflict, will affect travel volume and may in turn have a material adverse effect on the PRC operating entities’ business and results of operations. In addition, the PRC operating entities may not be adequately prepared in contingency planning or recovery capability in relation to a major incident or crisis, and as a result, their operational continuity may be adversely and materially affected, which in turn may harm their reputation.

If the PRC operating entities are not able to adapt to changes in their industry, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

The shift for a flexible employment model in China is relatively new and the competitors of the PRC operating entities are constantly developing new services to recruit and provide services to employers. The PRC operating entities continue to invest significant resources in their infrastructure, research and development and other areas to enhance their existing services as well as to introduce new services that will attract more participants to their Gongwuyuan Platform. The changes and developments taking place in this industry may also require the PRC operating entities to re-evaluate their business model and adopt significant changes to their long-term strategies and business plan. The failure of the PRC operating entities to innovate and adapt to these changes would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If the PRC operating entities fail to promote and maintain their brand in an effective and cost-efficient way, our business and results of operations may be harmed.

We believe that developing and maintaining awareness of the PRC operating entities’ brand effectively is critical to attracting new and retaining existing customers. Successful promotion of the PRC operating entities’ brand and their ability to attract customers depend largely on the effectiveness of their marketing efforts and the success of the channels they use to promote their services. It is likely that the PRC operating entities’ future marketing efforts will require them to incur significant additional expenses. These efforts may not result in increased revenues in the immediate future or at all and, even if they do, any increases in revenues may not offset the expenses incurred. If the PRC operating entities fail to successfully promote and maintain their brand while incurring substantial expenses, our results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected, which may impair the PRC operating entities’ ability to grow their business.

New lines of business or new services may subject us to additional risks.

From time to time, the PRC operating entities may implement new lines of business or offer new services within existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new services, the PRC operating entities may invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new services may not be achieved and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new service. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new services could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new services could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our significant loan receivables, including non-interest-bearing loans to investment holding companies, expose us to credit risk and may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition if not repaid. 

As of December 31, 2025, we had loan receivables of approximately $17.7 million. This amount is primarily attributable to two loan agreements entered into on December 15, 2025 with Xinyi International Group Ltd. (“Xinyi”) and Hesheng International Group Ltd. (“Hesheng”), respectively, each of which is principally engaged in investment holding and equity investment activities. Under these agreements, we provided loans in the principal amounts of $8,496,022 and $8,500,000, respectively. On April 1, 2026, we entered into supplemental agreements to these loan agreements with each of Xinyi and Hesheng pursuant to which, among other things, if Xinyi or Hesheng, as applicable, fail to repay the entire outstanding principal balance due under the loans by July 1, 2026, interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal amount retroactively from January 1, 2026 at an annual interest rate of 3%. On April 20, 2026, we entered into loan repayment plans with each of Xinyi and Hesheng pursuant to which, among other things, each of Xinyi and Hesheng shall commence repayment of their respective loans on July 15, 2026 and shall fully repay their respective loan (together with accrued interest) by December 15, 2026.

These loans are no-interest bearing for the first 6 months of their term, have contractual terms of 12 months and may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time without penalty. As of December 31, 2025, the loans remained outstanding and were not yet due.

Because these loans do not bear interest for the first six months of their respective terms, they do generate limited income to offset the risks associated with lending, and therefore represent an opportunity cost and potential inefficiency in our capital allocation. In addition, the borrowers’ businesses are focused on investment holding and equity investments, which may be subject to market volatility and liquidity risks that could impair their ability to repay the loans when due. 

Hesheng and Xinyi intend to use the proceeds from the loans to fund refundable project deposits that corporate clients require service providers to provide or guarantee. Typically, such deposits are refundable only upon contract completion. It is possible that these funds will not be refunded to Hesheng and/or Xinyi. If either borrower fails to repay the outstanding amounts in a timely manner, or at all, we may experience delays in cash inflows, incur impairment losses, or be required to pursue legal or other remedies, which may be costly and time-consuming. Any such delay or nonpayment could reduce the funds available for working capital, operations, strategic investments and other corporate purposes, and could force us to seek additional debt, equity financing or shareholder support on terms that may be unfavorable or dilutive to our shareholders. Furthermore, the concentration of a substantial portion of our assets in these loan receivables increases our exposure to the financial condition and creditworthiness of a limited number of counterparties. If we are forced to enter into an insolvent liquidation, any amounts received by Xinyi or Hesheng could be viewed as an unlawful payment if it was proved that immediately following the date on which the distribution was made, we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. As a result, a liquidator could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. Furthermore, our directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to us or our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing themselves and our company to claims.

We have previously experienced collection difficulties with third-party loans, including a loan that became past due, required legal enforcement, and was written off after we determined recovery was unlikely, and similar issues could recur with these larger loan balances. If we are unable to recover these amounts in whole or in part, our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and ability to execute our business strategy could be materially and adversely affected.

Any failure to recover these loan amounts, in whole or in part, or any significant delay in repayment, could materially and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If we do not adequately remediate the material weakness, or if we experience additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain effective internal controls, we may be unable to accurately or timely report our results of operations or prevent fraud, and investor confidence and the market price of our Class A Common Shares may be materially and adversely affected.

During the audit of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, certain material weaknesses were identified in the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting including, (i) insufficient full-time employees with the necessary levels of accounting expertise and knowledge to compile and analyze consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with U.S. GAAP and handle complicated U.S. GAAP accounting issues, and lack of comprehensive accounting policies and procedures manual in accordance with U.S. GAAP, (ii) the absence of timely related party transaction monitoring and the failure to update a completed related party list in time and failure to keep records of related party transactions on a regular basis; and (iii) insufficient awareness regarding the timely evaluation and recording of contingencies and estimated liabilities in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See “Item 15 – Controls and Procedures” for details on our remediation plans

We have instituted plans to remediate the material weaknesses, including implementation of appropriate processes with the objective of improving the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting, and we expect to invest more resources in our design and execution of our Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance program, such as reassessing existing entity-level controls and, as necessary, implementing enhancements to such controls. In addition, we expect to take additional remedial measures, including hiring additional qualified accounting professionals with relevant U.S. GAAP experience and providing recurring training to our finance team; establishing a centralized and routinely updated related party register supported by formal identification and monitoring processes; and implementing structured procedures for the timely assessment and recognition of contingencies and estimated liabilities, including regular coordination with legal counsel and operational departments. However, there can be no assurance that these material weaknesses will be remediated in a timely manner, or at all. Our failure to implement and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could result in errors in our financial statements that could result in a restatement of our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which may result in volatility in and a decline in the market price of our Class A Common Shares.

Additionally, we cannot assure you that we have identified all, or that we will not in the future have additional, material weaknesses. As a company with less than US$1.235 billion in revenue for our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” pursuant to the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company we may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in the assessment of the emerging growth company’s internal control over financial reporting.  

We are a public company in the United States subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, will require that we include a report of management on our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F. In addition, if we cease to be an “emerging growth company” as such term is defined in the JOBS Act but are classified as an accelerated filer, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on an annual basis. Our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may issue a report that is qualified if it is not satisfied with our internal controls or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us. In addition, after we become a public company, our reporting obligations may place a burden on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. We may be unable to timely complete our evaluation testing and any required remediation.

We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and any determination that we violated the foreign corrupt practices act could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act, or FCPA, and other laws that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by U.S. persons and issuers as defined by the statute for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The existing business of the PRC operating entities in Asia creates the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by one of the employees, consultants, or sales agents of our Company, because these parties are not always subject to the control of the PRC operating entities. It will be our policy to implement safeguards to discourage these practices by our employees. Also, our existing safeguards and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective, and the employees, consultants, or sales agents of our Company may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. Violations of the FCPA may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, the government may seek to hold our Company liable for successor liability for FCPA violations committed by companies in which we invest or that we acquire.

We (or a foreign investor) may become at risk of being taxed or imposed a penalty under Announcement 7 and may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with Announcement 7 or to establish that we (or such foreign investor) should not be taxed under Announcement 7, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations (or such foreign investor’s investment in us).

On December 10, 2009, the State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”) released the Notice on Strengthening Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises (“Circular 698”) that reinforces the taxation of non-listed equity transfers by non-resident enterprises through overseas holding vehicles. Circular 698 is retroactively effective from January 1, 2008. Subsequently SAT also released the Announcement on Several Issues Related to Enterprise Income Tax for Indirect Asset Transfer by Non-PRCResident Enterprises (“Announcement 7”), effective from February 3, 2015, which in part supersedes Circular 698.

Announcement 7 addresses indirect share transfer as well as other issues. According to Announcement 7, if a non-PRC resident enterprise transfers the equity interests of or similar rights or interests in overseas companies which directly or indirectly own PRC taxable assets through an arrangement without a reasonable commercial purpose, but rather to avoid PRC corporate income tax, the transaction will be re-characterized and treated as a direct transfer of PRC taxable assets subject to PRC corporate income tax. Announcement 7 specifies certain factors that should be considered in determining whether an indirect transfer has a reasonable commercial purpose. Since Announcement 7 has a short history, there is uncertainty as to its application, and in particular, the interpretation of the term “reasonable commercial purpose.”

Announcement 7 further provides that, the entity which has the obligation to pay the consideration for the transfer to the transferring shareholders has the obligation to withhold any PRC corporate income tax that is due. If the transferring shareholders do not pay corporate income tax that is due for a transfer and the entity which has the obligation to pay the consideration does not withhold the tax due, the PRC tax authorities may impose a penalty on the entity that so fails to withhold, which may be relieved or exempted from the withholding obligation and any resulting penalty under certain circumstances if it reports such transfer to the PRC tax authorities.

In October 2017, SAT issued the Announcement on Issues Relating to Withholding at Source of Income Tax of Non-resident Enterprises, or the SAT Circular 37, amended in June 2018. The SAT Circular 37 superseded Circular 698 as a whole and partially amended some provisions in Announcement 7. SAT Circular 37 purports to clarify certain issues in the implementation of the above regime, by providing, among others, the definition of equity transfer income and tax basis, the foreign exchange rate to be used in the calculation of withholding amount, and the date of occurrence of the withholding obligation. Specifically, SAT Circular 37 provides that where the transfer income subject to withholding at source is derived by a non-PRC resident enterprise in installments, the installments may first be treated as recovery of costs of previous investments. Upon recovery of all costs, the tax amount to be withheld must then be computed and withheld.

Risks Relating to the Variable Interest Entity (VIE) Structure

The PRC government may find that the Contractual Arrangements with the VIE and its shareholders to operate our business in China do not comply with applicable PRC Laws, or if these applicable PRC Laws or the interpretation of existing applicable PRC Laws change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations. Additionally, such determination by the PRC government and changes or interpretations in PRC Laws, if occurred, may cause significant decline in the value of our shares, or even render our shares worthless.

Current PRC Laws impose certain restrictions and prohibitions on foreign ownership of companies that engage in telecommunication and internet businesses. For example, foreign investors are generally not allowed to own more than 50% of the equity interests in a value-added telecommunications service provider (other than operating e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, store-and-forward, and call center services). For more information on the restrictions on foreign investors to invest in a value-added telecommunications businesses in the PRC and the impact on us, please refer to the section headed “Regulations — Foreign Investment in Value-Added Telecommunications Services.”

To comply with PRC Laws, we conduct substantially all of our business in China through Contractual Arrangements with Gongwuyuan, or the VIE, and certain shareholders of the VIE which enable us to (i) receive ninety-five percent (95%) of the economic benefits of the VIE as the consideration for our services provided; (ii) have the power to appoint directors and vote on behalf of the shareholders on all matters regarding the VIE that require shareholders’ approval; (iii) hold a pledge on ninety-five percent (95%) equity interests in the VIE; and (iv) have an exclusive option to purchase or designate a third party to purchase all or part of the ninety-five percent (95%) equity interests in the VIE or purchase all or part of the ninety-five percent (95%) assets of Gongwuyuan when and to the extent permitted by the laws of the PRC.  The PRC operating entities hold the licenses, approvals and key assets that are essential for our business operations.

However, there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations. The relevant PRC regulatory authorities have discretion in determining whether the VIE structure violates PRC laws and regulations. If we are found in violation of any PRC laws or regulations, or if the VIE structure is disallowed by the relevant governmental authorities, or if the VIE Agreements are determined as illegal or invalid by any PRC court, arbitral tribunal or regulatory authorities, the relevant governmental authorities would have discretion in dealing with such violations, including, without limitation:

The imposition of any of these penalties would result in a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct business via the VIE, and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, if the PRC government determines the Contractual Arrangements with the VIE and its shareholders to operate our business in China do not comply with applicable PRC Laws, or if these applicable PRC Laws or the interpretation of existing applicable PRC Laws change in the future, and as a result, we are unable to assert contractual control over the assets of our PRC subsidiaries or the VIE, our shares may significantly decline in value, or even lose all its value.

We rely on Contractual Arrangements with the VIE and certain shareholders of the VIE to consolidate financial results of the PRC operating entities.

We do not have an equity ownership in, direct foreign investment in, or control of, through such ownership or investment, the VIE.

Due to the PRC restrictions or prohibitions on foreign ownership of certain businesses in China, we operate the PRC operating entities’ business in China through the Contractual Arrangements in which we have no direct ownership interest. We have relied and expect to continue to rely on the Contractual Arrangements with the VIE and certain shareholders of the VIE to consolidate the financial results of the PRC operating entities’ business. These contractual arrangements are intended to enable us to (i) direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, (ii) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the VIE and its subsidiaries; and (iii) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in and assets of the VIE and its subsidiaries when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. Please refer to the section headed “Corporate History and Structure — Contractual Arrangements among Pengze WFOE, Gongwuyuan, and the Shareholders of the VIE” in this annual report for more details.

The Contractual Arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us control over the VIE. For example, the VIE and their shareholders could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to conduct the operations of the VIE in an acceptable manner or taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests.

If we had direct ownership of the VIE in China, we would be able to exercise our rights as a shareholder to effect changes in the board of directors of the VIE, which in turn could implement changes, subject to any applicable fiduciary obligations, at the management and operational level. However, under the current contractual arrangements, we rely on the performance by the VIE and their shareholders of their obligations under the contracts to exercise control over the VIE. The shareholders of the VIE may not act in the best interests of our company or may not perform their obligations under these contracts. If any dispute relating to these contracts remains unresolved, we will have to enforce our rights under these contracts through the operations of PRC law and arbitration, litigation and other legal proceedings and therefore will be subject to uncertainties in the PRC legal system.

Any failure by the VIE or their shareholders to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and adverse effect on our business.

If the VIE or their shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and contractual remedies, which we cannot assure you will be sufficient or effective under PRC law. For example, if the shareholders of the VIE were to refuse to transfer their equity interests in the VIE to us or our designee if we exercise the purchase option pursuant to these contractual arrangements, or if they were otherwise to act in bad faith toward us, then we may have to take legal actions to compel them to perform their contractual obligations. In addition, if any third parties claim any interest in such shareholders’ equity interests in the VIE, our ability to exercise shareholders’ rights or foreclose the share pledge according to the contractual arrangements may be impaired. If these or other disputes between the shareholders of the VIE and third parties were to impair our control over the VIE, our ability to consolidate the financial results of the VIE would be affected, which would in turn result in a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition.

These Contractual Arrangements are governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the PRC, and disputes arising from these Contractual Arrangements will be resolved through arbitration in China. The legal system in the PRC is still developing. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. See “Item 3.D. Key Information—Risk Factors—— Risks relating to doing business in China — Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system, including uncertainties regarding the enforcement of laws, and sudden or unexpected changes in laws and regulations in China could adversely affect us and limit the legal protections available to you and us.” Further, there are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a consolidated VIE should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law. There remain significant uncertainties regarding the ultimate outcome of such arbitration should legal action become necessary. In addition, under PRC law, rulings by arbitrators are final and parties cannot appeal the arbitration results in courts, and if the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit, the prevailing parties may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts through arbitration award recognition proceedings, which would require additional expenses and delay. In the event we are unable to enforce the Contractual Arrangements, or we experience significant delays or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to exert effective control over the VIE and may lose control over the assets owned by it. As a result, we may be unable to consolidate the consolidated financial statements of the PRC operating entities and our ability to conduct business may be negatively affected.

We may lose the ability to use and enjoy assets held by Gongwuyuan that are material to our business operations if Gongwuyuan or one of its subsidiaries declares bankruptcy or become subject to a dissolution or liquidation proceeding.

As part of our Contractual Arrangements, Gongwuyuan holds certain assets that are material for the PRC operating entities’ business operations, including permits, domain names and IP rights, among others. If Gongwuyuan or one of its subsidiaries goes bankrupt or all or part of its assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, we may be unable to continue some or all of the PRC operating entities’ business activities, which could materially and adversely affect our, and the VIE’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Under the Contractual Arrangements, Gongwuyuan may not enter into any transaction, except in the ordinary course of business, which substantially affect its assets, obligations, rights or operation without prior written consent from us. Further, if Gongwuyuan undergoes a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, independent third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of its assets, thereby hindering our ability to operate our, and VIE’s business, which could materially and adversely affect our, and VIE’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we exercise the option to acquire an equity ownership in Gongwuyuan, the ownership transfer may subject us to certain limitations and substantial costs.

Pursuant to the Regulations for the Administration of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises (the “FITE Regulations”) promulgated by the State Council, foreign investors are not allowed to hold more than 50% of the equity interests of any company providing value-added telecommunications services, including Internet Content Provider (“ICP”) services. In addition, foreign-invested telecommunication enterprises should meet the requirements as prescribed in the relevant regulations. As there remain uncertainties regarding the review requirements of foreign-invested telecommunications enterprises in China, we cannot assure you that we could meet the requirements as prescribed and could pass the examination and approval of the competent telecommunications authorities.

Pursuant to the Contractual Arrangements, the Pengze WFOE, or its designated person has the exclusive right to purchase up to ninety-five percent (95%) of the equity interests in Gongwuyuan from the shareholders at the lowest price permitted by applicable PRC Law, when and if permitted by applicable PRC Law. The equity transfer may be subject to the approvals from, registrations with or report to the MIIT, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the MOFCOM of the PRC and/or their local competent branches. In addition, the equity transfer price may be subject to review and tax adjustment by the relevant tax authority. The shareholders will then pay the equity transfer price they receive to the Pengze WFOE or its designated person under the Contractual Arrangements. The amount to be received by the Pengze WFOE may also be subject to enterprise income tax. Such tax amounts could be substantial.

Uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the newly enacted Foreign Investment Law, and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance, business, financial condition and results of operations.

On March 15, 2019, China’s National People’s Congress promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the trio of previous laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. However, since it is relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation, and failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with the regulatory-compliance challenges could result in material and adverse effect on us. For instance, though the Foreign Investment Law does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, it contains a catch-all provision under the definition of “foreign investment”, which includes investments made by foreign investors in China through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council of PRC. Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions promulgated by the State Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, at which time it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment in the PRC and how our Contractual Arrangements will be dealt with. In addition, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. We may be required to unwind our existing Contractual Arrangements and/or dispose of the relevant business operations, which could have a material and adverse effect on our current corporate structure, corporate governance, business, financial condition and results of operations.

On December 27, 2021, the Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (2021 Edition), or the Negative List (2021) were promulgated. The Negative List (2021) was then abolished by the Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (2024 Edition), or the Negative List (2024), which was promulgated on September 6, 2024 and became effective on November 1, 2024. The Negative List (2024) stipulates that if a domestic enterprise engaged in business in the prohibited investment field issues shares abroad and is listed for trading, it shall be examined and approved by the relevant competent authorities of the state. According to a press release issued by the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) in relation to the same provisions in the Negative List (2021), the above provisions are only applicable to the direct overseas listing of domestic enterprises engaged in the prohibited investment field. However, if relevant governmental authority determines or new future rules provides that we are required to obtain the approval, we would have to apply for such approval. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain such approval in time or at all. If we fail to obtain the approve as required or in a timely manner, the VIE structure may be deemed illegal and ordered to be cancelled by relevant government authorities, and other administrative measures or penalties may be imposed on us, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares.

Our Contractual Arrangements may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and who may determine that we owe additional taxes which could substantially reduce our consolidated net income.

Under PRC Laws, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. We could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the Contractual Arrangements among the Pengze WFOE, Gongwuyuan and its shareholders do not represent an arms-length price and adjust the VIE’s income in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction, for PRC tax purposes, of expense deductions recorded by Gongwuyuan, which could in turn increase its tax liabilities. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties to Gongwuyuan for under-paid taxes. Our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected if our tax liabilities increase or if we are found to be subject to late payment fees or other penalties. Our financial conditions could be materially and adversely affected if our tax liabilities increase or Gongwuyuan is required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.

The shareholders of the VIE may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The shareholders of the VIE in Baiya may breach, or refuse to renew, the existing Contractual Arrangements we have with them, which may have a material and adverse effect on our ability to effectively consolidate financial results of Gongwuyuan as primary beneficiary. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise any or all of these shareholders will act in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor. If we cannot resolve any conflict of interest or dispute between us and these shareholders, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which could result in disruption of our business and subject us to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

If the custodians or authorized users of our controlling non-tangible assets, including chops and seals of the VIE, fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets, our business and operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Under PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions, including agreements and contracts that our business relies on, are executed using the chop or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is filed with the relevant local branch of the State Administration for Market Regulation (“SAMR”), formerly known as the State Administration for Industry and Commerce. We generally execute legal documents by affixing chops or seals, rather than having the designated legal representatives sign the documents.

We use three major types of chops: corporate chops, contract chops and finance chops. Chops are seals or stamps used by a PRC company to legally authorize documents, often in place of a signature. We use corporate chops generally for documents to be submitted to government agencies, such as applications for changing business scope, directors or company name, and for legal letters. We use contract chops generally for contracts and agreements. We use finance chops generally for making and collecting payments, including issuing invoices. Use of corporate chops must be approved by department manager and office of the president, use of contract chops must be approved by department manager or responsible personnel with higher authority, and use of finance chops must be approved by our finance department. The chops of our PRC subsidiary and consolidated VIE are generally held by the relevant entities so that documents can be executed locally. Although we usually utilize chops to execute contracts, the registered legal representatives of our PRC subsidiary and consolidated VIE have the apparent authority to enter into contracts on behalf of such entities without chops, unless such contracts set forth otherwise.

In order to maintain the physical security of our chops, we generally have them stored in secured locations accessible only to the designated key employees of the office of the president or finance departments. Our designated legal representatives generally do not have access to the chops. Although we have approval procedures in place and monitor our key employees, including the designated legal representatives of our subsidiary and consolidated VIE, the procedures may not be sufficient to prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. There is a risk that our key employees or designated legal representatives could abuse their authority, for example, by binding our subsidiary and consolidated VIE with contracts against our interests, as we would be obligated to honor these contracts if the other contracting party acts in good faith in reliance on the apparent authority of our chops or signatures of our legal representatives. If any designated legal representative obtains control of the chop in an effort to obtain control over the relevant entity, we will need to have a shareholder or board resolution to designate a new legal representative to take legal action to seek the return of the chop, apply for a new chop with the relevant authorities, or otherwise seek legal remedies for the legal representative’s misconduct. If any of the designated legal representatives obtains and misuses or misappropriates our chops and seals or other controlling intangible assets for whatever reason, we could experience disruption to our normal business operations. We may have to take corporate or legal action, which could involve significant time and resources to resolve the matter, while distracting management from our operations, and our business operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Risks Relating to Doing Business in China

The recent state government interference into business activities on U.S. listed Chinese companies may negatively impact our existing and future operations in China. The Chinese government may intervene in or influence our operations at any time, which could result in a material change in our operations and significantly and adversely impact the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares, including potentially causing the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares to decline or be worthless.

The Chinese government has significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business and may intervene or influence our operations as the government deems appropriate to further regulatory, political and societal goals. To the extent that the cash and assets in our business are in the PRC operating entities, the funds or assets may not be available to fund operations or for other use outside of the PRC due to intervention in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations on the ability of us or our subsidiaries by the Chinese government to transfer cash or assets. Any such intervention in or influence on our business operations or action to exert more oversight and control over the cash or assets of our subsidiaries, once taken by the Chinese government, could adversely affect our, and or VIE’s business, financial condition and results of operations and the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares, or significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or in extreme cases, become worthless.

The Chinese government has recently published new policies that significantly affected certain industries such as the internet industries, and we cannot rule out the possibility that it will in the future release regulations or policies that could require us to seek other permission from Chinese authorities to continue to operate our business, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, recent statements made by the Chinese government have indicated an intent to increase the government’s oversight and control over offerings of companies with significant operations in China that are to be conducted in foreign markets, as well as foreign investment in China-based issuers like us. Any such action, if taken by the Chinese government, could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer the Class A Ordinary Shares to our investors and could cause the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or become worthless.

Recently, the Chinese government announced that it would step up supervision of Chinese companies listed offshore. Under the new measures, China will improve regulation of cross-border data flows and security, crack down on illegal activity in the securities market and punish fraudulent securities issuance, market manipulation and insider trading, China will also check sources of funding for securities investment and control leverage ratios. The CAC has also opened a cybersecurity probe into several U.S.-listed tech giants focusing on anti-monopoly, financial technology regulation and more recently, with the passage of the Data Security Law, how companies collect, store, process and transfer data.

Although Baiya is a Cayman Islands holding company, the PRC operating entities are headquartered and have operations in China. Because the PRC operating entities are in China and our major shareholders are located in China, there is always a risk that the Chinese government may in the future seek to intervene or influence operations of any company with any level of operations in China, including its ability to offer securities to investors, list its securities on a U.S. or other foreign exchange, conduct its business or accept foreign investment. In light of China’s recent announcements, there are risks and uncertainties which we cannot foresee for the time being, and rules and regulations in China can change quickly with little or no advance notice. The Chinese government may intervene or influence our PRC subsidiary’s current and future operations in China at any time, or may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in issuers likes ourselves.

If any or all of the foregoing were to occur, this could lead to a material change in the PRC operating entities’ operations and/or the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares and/or significantly limit or completely hinder its ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued the New Administrative Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, which became effective on March 31, 2023. According to the New Administrative Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, among other things, a domestic company in the PRC that seeks to offer and list securities in overseas markets shall fulfill the filing procedure with the CSRC. When a domestic company seeks to directly offer and list securities in overseas markets, the issuer shall file with the CSRC. When a domestic company seeks to indirectly offer and list securities in overseas markets, the issuer shall designate a major domestic operating entity, which shall, as the domestic responsible entity, file with the CSRC. Initial public offerings or listings in overseas markets shall be filed with the CSRC within 3 working days after the relevant application is submitted overseas. The required filing materials with the CSRC include (without limitation): (i) record-filing reports and related undertakings, (ii) compliance certificates, filing or approval documents from the primary regulators of applicants’ businesses (if applicable), (iii) security assessment opinions issued by related departments (if applicable), (iv) PRC legal opinions issued by domestic law firms (with related undertakings), and (v) prospectus or listing documents.

In addition, under the New Administrative Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, a domestic company is prohibited from overseas offering and listing if any of the following circumstances is involved: (1) where such securities offering and listing is explicitly prohibited by provisions in laws, administrative regulations and relevant state rules; (2) where the intended securities offering and listing may endanger national security as reviewed and determined by competent authorities under the State Council in accordance with law; (3) where the domestic company intending to make the securities offering and listing, or its controlling shareholders and the actual controller, have committed crimes such as corruption, bribery, embezzlement, misappropriation of property or undermining the order of the socialist market economy during the latest three years; (4) where the domestic company intending to make the securities offering and listing is suspected of committing crimes or major violations of laws and regulations, and is under investigation according to law, and no conclusion has yet been made thereof; and (5) where there are material ownership disputes over equity held by the domestic company’s controlling shareholder or by other shareholders that are controlled by the controlling shareholder and/or actual controller. Moreover, a domestic company that seeks to offer and list securities in overseas markets shall abide by certain other regulatory requirements as set out in the New Administrative Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, including without limitation to, compliance with national secrecy, foreign investment, cybersecurity, data security, cross-border investment and financing, foreign exchange, and other laws and relevant provisions.

Pursuant to the New Administrative Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, we filed with the CSRC in accordance with the Trial Administrative Measures with respect to our initial public offering in March 2025. We completed such filing procedures on June 27, 2024, the completion of which was posted on the official website of the CSRC on June 28, 2024. As of the date of this annual report, the contractual arrangements have not been tested in court. However, we cannot assure you of whether there will be further regulatory requirements related to overseas securities offerings and other capital markets activities. Any failure on our part to fully comply with further regulatory requirements may significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer our Class A Ordinary Shares, cause significant disruption to our business operations, and severely damage our reputation, which would materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and cause our Class A Ordinary Shares to significantly decline in value or become worthless.

On February 24, 2023, the CSRC promulgated the Confidentiality and Archives Administration Provisions, which also became effective on March 31, 2023. According to the Confidentiality and Archives Administration Provisions, domestic companies that seek overseas offering and listing (either in direct or indirect means) and the securities companies and securities service (either incorporated domestically or overseas) providers that undertake relevant businesses shall institute a sound confidentiality and archives administration system, and take necessary measures to fulfill confidentiality and archives administration obligations. They shall not leak any state secret or working secret of government agencies, or harm national security and public interests.

Furthermore, a domestic company that provides accounting archives or copies of accounting archives to any entities, including securities companies, securities service providers and overseas regulators and individuals, shall fulfill due procedures in compliance with applicable regulations. Working papers produced in the mainland China by securities companies and securities service providers in the process of undertaking businesses related to overseas offering and listing by domestic companies shall be retained in mainland China. Where such documents need to be transferred or transmitted to areas outside of mainland China, relevant approval procedures stipulated by regulations shall be followed. We believe that our initial public offering in March 2025 did not involve the leaking of any state secret or working secret of government agencies, or the harming of national security and public interests. However, we may be required to perform additional procedures in connection with the provision of accounting archives. The specific requirements of the relevant procedures are currently unclear and we cannot be certain whether we will be able to perform the relevant procedures.

Any failure of us to fully comply with new regulatory requirements may significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer our Class A Ordinary Shares, cause significant disruption to our business operations, severely damage our reputation, materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and cause our Class A Ordinary Shares to significantly decline in value or become worthless.

Adverse changes in economic and political policies of the PRC government could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China, which could adversely affect our, and VIE’s business.

Substantially all of our operations are located in China through the VIE and its subsidiaries. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by political, economic and social conditions in China generally. Although the Chinese economy is no longer a planned economy, the PRC government continues to exercise significant control over China’s economic growth through direct allocation of resources, monetary and tax policies, and a host of other government policies such as those that encourage or restrict investment in certain industries by foreign investors, control the exchange between RMB and foreign currencies, and regulate the growth of the general or specific market.

While the Chinese economy has experienced significant growth over the past decades, growth has been varied, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy, and the rate of growth has been slowing since 2012. Any adverse changes in economic conditions in China, in the policies of the Chinese government or in the laws and regulations in China could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China. Such developments could adversely affect our, and VIE’s business and operating results, lead to reduction in demand for VIE’s services and adversely affect VIE’s competitive position. The Chinese government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the overall Chinese economy, but may have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations.

In addition, in the past the Chinese government has implemented certain measures, including interest rate adjustment, to control the pace of economic growth. These measures may cause decreased economic activity in China, which may adversely affect our business and operating results.

PRC foreign exchange controls and foreign debt rules may restrict our ability to move capital and could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and operations

PRC regulations governing foreign exchange, cross-border capital movements, and foreign debt, including rules administered by SAFE and the PBOC’s macro-prudential framework, may limit our ability to transfer cash between our offshore holding company, our PRC subsidiaries, and the VIE and its subsidiaries. These rules may restrict or delay our ability to make capital contributions or loans to our PRC operations, receive dividends or other distributions from our PRC subsidiaries, settle intercompany balances, or otherwise move funds across borders. If we are unable to obtain required registrations, complete filings, satisfy applicable quotas, or comply with changing regulatory requirements, our ability to upstream cash, finance our operations, fund expansion, or service our obligations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, any tightening in the interpretation or enforcement of these rules could reduce our financial flexibility, impair our liquidity, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system, including uncertainties regarding the enforcement of laws, and sudden or unexpected changes in of laws and regulations in China applicable to us could adversely affect us and limit the legal protections available to you and us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Prior court decisions are encouraged to be used for reference but it remains unclear to what extent the prior court decisions may impact the current court ruling as the encouragement policy is new and there is limited judicial practice in this regard. Since a large number of laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues to rapidly evolve, the interpretations of certain laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and the enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties.

In 1979, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and regulations governing economic matters in general. The overall effect of legislation over the past decades has significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, Chinese legal system is still developing, and recently enacted laws and regulations may not sufficiently cover all aspects of economic activities in China. In particular, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory provisions and contractual terms, it may be difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy. These uncertainties may affect our judgement on the relevance of legal requirements and our ability to enforce our, or VIE’s contractual rights or tort claims.

In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited or frivolous legal actions or threats in attempts to extract payments or benefits from us.

Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely basis or at all and may have retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our, or VIE’s violation of any of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. In addition, any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. However, since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules (some of which are not published in a timely manner or at all) that may have retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. Such uncertainties, including uncertainty over the scope and effect of its contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights, and any failure to respond to changes in the regulatory environment in China could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.

We are also subject to the legal and operational risks associated with being based in and having substantially all operations in China. These risks may result in material changes in operations, or a complete hindrance of our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and could cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or become worthless. Recently, the PRC government initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in China with little advance notice, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over overseas listing of domestic enterprises, adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews, and expanding the efforts in anti-monopoly enforcement. On July 6, 2021, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued an announcement to crack down on illegal activities in the securities market and promote the high-quality development of the capital market, which, among other things, requires the relevant governmental authorities to strengthen cross-border oversight of law-enforcement and judicial cooperation, to enhance supervision over China-based companies listed overseas, and to establish and improve the system of extraterritorial application of the PRC securities laws. On December 28, 2021, Cybersecurity Review Measures (2021 version) was issued, which became effective on February 15, 2022. As of the date of this annual report, the above regulations have not impacted our ability to conduct the business, accept foreign investments, or list on a U.S. or other foreign exchange; however, there are uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of these new laws and guidelines, which could materially and adversely impact our overall business and financial outlook.

The PRC legal system is evolving, and the resulting uncertainties could adversely affect us.

We conduct our business in China through the PRC operating entities. The operations of the PRC operating entities in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations.

As the legislation in China and the PRC legal system has continued to evolve rapidly over the past decades and the PRC government has made significant progress in promulgating laws and regulations related to economic affairs and matters, for example, such laws and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, some of these laws and regulations are relatively new and there is a limited volume of published decisions and enactments. In particular, there exist uncertainties surrounding the evolvement, interpretation and enforcement of regulatory requirements of cybersecurity, data security, privacy protection as well as anti-monopoly, and we may need to take certain corresponding measures to maintain our regulatory compliance, such as adjusting the relevant business or transactions and introducing compliance experts and talents, which may incur additional related costs and adverse impact on our business. As a result, the interpretations of some laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties, which may limit legal protections available to us. Therefore, there are uncertainties involved in their implementation and interpretation, and it may be difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection available to you and us. Such uncertainties, including uncertainty over the scope and effect of our contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights, and any failure to respond to changes in the regulatory environment in China could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.

We, and the VIE may be adversely affected by the complexity, uncertainties and changes in PRC regulation related to the internet-related business and companies.

The PRC government extensively regulates the internet industry, including foreign ownership of, and the licensing and permit requirements pertaining to, companies in the internet industry. These internet-related laws and regulations are relatively new and evolving, and their interpretation and enforcement involve uncertainty. As a result, in certain circumstances it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violations of applicable laws and regulations. Issues, risks and uncertainties relating to PRC regulation of the internet business include, but are not limited to, the following:

The interpretation and application of existing PRC laws, regulations and policies and possible new laws, regulations or policies relating to the internet industry have created substantial uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, internet businesses in China, including our business. For example, according to the Negative List (2024), our value-added telecommunication services are restricted industry. The Negative List (2024) also stipulates that if a domestic enterprise engaged in business in the prohibited investment field issues shares abroad and is listed for trading, it shall be examined and approved by the relevant competent authorities of the state. According to a press release issued by the NDRC in relation to the same provisions in the Negative List (2021), the above provisions are only applicable to the direct overseas listing of domestic enterprises engaged in business in the prohibited investment field. However, provisions on overseas indirect listing of domestic companies are still being formulated and there are no detailed rules in connection with relevant requirements or procedures to obtain approval from relevant competent departments of the state. If relevant governmental authority determines or new future rules provides that we are required to obtain the approval and/or abide by the management requirement, we would have to apply for such approval and/or adjust our current management mechanism. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain such approval in time or at all.

Subject to interpretation by the relevant authorities, it may not be possible for us to determine in all cases the type of content that could result in liability for us, especially if the Chinese government continues to maintain or strengthen its heightened scrutiny on internet content in China. We may not be able to control or restrict all of the online content generated, transmitted or placed on our network or platform by our users, despite our attempt to monitor and filter such content. To the extent that regulatory authorities find any portion of our content on our network or platform objectionable or requiring any license or permit that we have not obtained, they may require us to limit or eliminate the dissemination of such information or otherwise curtail the nature of such content, and keep records and report to relevant authorities, which may reduce our user traffic. In addition, we may be subject to significant penalties for violations of those regulations arising from prohibited content displayed on, retrieved from or uploaded to our network or platform, including a suspension or shutdown of our operations. The enforcement activities may be intensified in connection with any ongoing government campaigns. In addition, while we maintain a regular internal monitoring and compliance protocol, we cannot ascertain that we would not fall foul of any changing or new government regulations or standards in the future. If we receive a public warning from the relevant government authorities or our licenses are revoked, our reputation would be harmed and if the operation of our online business is suspended or shut down entirely or in part, our revenues and results of operation may be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, the internal compliance investigation and the removal of content may have a material impact on our network or platform operation, which in turn may lead to a decrease in users and have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. To date, we have not been able to quantify the magnitude and extent of such impact.

The successful operations of our and VIE’s business and our growth depend upon the internet infrastructure and telecommunication networks in China.

Almost all access to the internet in China is maintained through state-owned telecommunication operators under the administrative control and regulatory supervision of the MIIT. Moreover, the VIE primarily relies on a limited number of telecommunication service providers to provide it with data communications capacity through local telecommunications lines. The VIE has limited access to alternative networks or services in the event of disruptions, failures or other problems with China’s internet infrastructure or telecommunications networks provided by telecommunication service providers. Internet traffic in China has experienced significant growth during the past few years. Effective bandwidth and server storage at internet data centers in large cities in China are limited. With the expansion of our, and VIE’s business, the VIE may be required to upgrade its technology and infrastructure to keep up with the increasing traffic on its mobile apps and websites. We cannot assure you that the internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China will be able to support the increased demands associated with the continued growth in internet usage. If the VIE is unable to increase our online content and service delivering capacity accordingly, the VIE may not be able to continuously grow its internet traffic and the adoption of its products and services may be hindered, which could adversely impact our, and VIE’s business and our Share price.

In addition, we, and the VIE have no control over the costs of the services provided by telecommunication service providers. If the prices the VIE pays for telecommunications and internet services rise significantly, our, and VIE’s results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Furthermore, if internet access fees or other charges to internet users increase, users may be discouraged or prevented from accessing the internet and thus cause the growth of internet users to decelerate. Such deceleration may adversely affect VIE’s ability to continue to expand its user base, which in turn could adversely affect the operation of our, and VIE’s business and growth.

Regulation and censorship of information disseminated over the internet in China may adversely affect our business and reputation and subject the VIE to liability for information displayed on our websites.

The PRC government has adopted regulations governing internet access and the distribution of news and other information over the internet. Under these regulations, internet content providers and internet publishers are prohibited from posting or displaying over the internet content that, among other things, violates PRC Laws, impairs the national dignity of China, or is reactionary, obscene, superstitious, fraudulent or defamatory. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the revocation of licenses to provide internet content and other licenses, and the closure of the concerned websites. In the past, failure to comply with such requirements has resulted in the closure of certain websites. The website operator may also be held liable for such censored information displayed on or linked to the websites. If any of VIE’s websites and teaching materials disseminated are found to be in violation of any such requirements, the VIE may be penalized by relevant authorities, and VIE’s operations or reputation could be adversely affected.

We may be subject to liability for placing advertisements with content that is deemed inappropriate or misleading under PRC laws.

According to Chinese law, if any advertisement issued by our PRC subsidiary infringes the rights and interests of a third party, contain contents prohibited by the relevant laws, or is otherwise in violation of relevant regulatory requirements, the PRC operating entities may bear the liability for compensation or be subject to investigations or penalties by governmental authorities, which may cause us financial loss.

The PRC operating entities may be liable for improper collection, use or appropriation of personal information provided by our customers and users.

The PRC operating entities collect and retains customer and user data, including personal information. The PRC operating entities also maintain information about various aspects of their operations as well as regarding their employees. The integrity and protection of the PRC operating entities’ customer, user, employee and company data is critical to our business. The PRC operating entities’ customers, users and employees expect that the PRC operating entities will adequately protect their personal information. The PRC operating entities are required by applicable laws to keep strictly confidential the personal information that we collect, and to take adequate security measures to safeguard such information.

According to the applicable PRC laws and regulations in relation to cybersecurity and data security, data processing includes, in a broad sense, among others, the collection or access, processing, transmission and related data activities.

The PRC Criminal Law, as amended by its Amendment 7 (effective on February 28, 2009), and Amendment 9 (effective on November 1, 2015), Amendment 10 (effective on November 4, 2017) and Amendment 11 (effective on March 1, 2021), prohibits institutions, companies and their employees from selling or otherwise illegally disclosing a citizen’s personal information obtained during the course of performing duties or providing services or obtaining such information through theft or other illegal ways. The Civil Code of the PRC (issued by the PRC National People’s Congress on May 28, 2020 and effective from January 1, 2021) provides main legal basis for privacy and personal information infringement claims under the Chinese civil laws. PRC regulators, including the CAC, MIIT, and the Ministry of Public Security have been increasingly focused on regulation in the areas of data security and data protection. The PRC regulatory requirements regarding cybersecurity are constantly evolving. For instance, various regulatory bodies in China, including the CAC, the Ministry of Public Security and the SAMR, have enforced data privacy and protection laws and regulations with varying and evolving standards and interpretations. The PRC governmental authorities have promulgated, among others, the Cyber Security Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国网络安全法》), Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China (《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》), Data Security Law of the People’s Republic of China (《中华人民共和国数据安全法》), Measures for Cybersecurity Review (2021) (《网络安全审查办法(2021)》), the Measures for the Security Assessment of Outbound Data Transfers, or the Measures (《数据出境安全评估办法》) and the Regulations on the Network Data Security Management (the “Data Security Management Regulations”) (《网络数据安全管理条例》) to ensure cyber security, data and personal information protection.

The PRC operating entities attach great importance to data security, cyber security and personal information protection, and the evolvement of applicable PRC laws and regulations therewith, and we strive to comply with laws and regulations with respect to data security, cyber security and personal information protection. As of the date of this annual report, The PRC operating entities have implemented comprehensive internal policies and measures on protection of cyber security, data privacy and personal information so as to comply with relevant PRC laws and regulations. The main internal policies and measures of are as follows: (i) for customer data processing, the PRC operating entities deploy the access control mechanism on the server side, adopts the principle of minimum authorization for the staff who may contact end users’ personal data; (ii) the PRC operating entities’ operating systems and database systems have password complexity requirements; (iii) the PRC operating entities have established Information Security Committee and appoints Bin Tan to be the head of the committee; (iv) the PRC operating entities have formulated a cybersecurity contingency plan and will conduct training and safety drills every year in preparation for any emergency cybersecurity incidents; (v) the PRC operating entities have established data privacy policies to ensure that its collection of data is conducted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and that the collection is for legitimate purposes as set out in its agreements.

While the PRC operating entities take various measures to comply with applicable data privacy and protection laws and regulations, there is no guarantee that our current or past security measures and those of our third-party service providers may always be adequate for the protection of our customer, employee or company data, nor fully fulfil the requirements under relevant PRC laws and regulations; and like all companies, the PRC operating entities have experienced data incidents from time to time. In addition, given the size of our customer base and the types and volume of personal data on the PRC operating entities’ system, the PRC operating entities may be a particularly attractive target for computer hackers, foreign governments or cyber terrorists. Unauthorized access to the PRC operating entities’ proprietary internal and customer data may be obtained through break-ins, sabotage, breach of their secure network by an unauthorized party, computer viruses, computer denial-of-service attacks, employee theft or misuse, breach of the security of the networks of their third-party service providers, or other misconduct. Because the techniques used by computer programmers who may attempt to penetrate and sabotage the PRC operating entities’ proprietary internal and customer data change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, the PRC operating entities may be unable to anticipate these techniques. Unauthorized access to the PRC operating entities’ proprietary internal and customer data may also be obtained through inadequate use of security controls. Any of such incidents may harm our and the VIE’s reputation and adversely affect our and the VIE’s business and results of operations. In addition, we and the VIE may be subject to negative publicity about our security and privacy policies, systems, or measurements from time to time.

Any failure to prevent or mitigate security breaches, cyber-attacks or other unauthorized access to the PRC operating entities’ systems or disclosure of our customers’ data, including their personal information, could result in loss or misuse of such data, interruptions to their service system, diminished customer experience, loss of customer confidence and trust, impairment of our technology infrastructure, and harm the PRC operating entities’ reputation and business, resulting in significant legal and financial exposure and potential lawsuits and could cause the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or be worthless. In addition, any violation of the provisions and requirements under relevant laws and regulations with respect to cyber security, data security and personal information protection may subject the PRC operating entities to rectifications, warnings, fines, confiscation of illegal gains, suspension of the related business, revocation of licenses, cancellation of qualifications being entered into the relevant credit record or even criminal liabilities.

In April 2020, the Chinese government promulgated the Cybersecurity Review Measures, which came into effect on June 1, 2020. According to the Cybersecurity Review Measures, operators of critical information infrastructure must pass a cybersecurity review when purchasing network products and services which do or may affect national security. On December 28, 2021, the CAC published the Measures for Cybersecurity Review (2021 version), which became effective on February 15, 2022 and replace the Measures for Cybersecurity Review promulgated on April 13, 2020. The Measures for Cybersecurity Review (2021 version) specifies that the procurement of network products and services by operator of critical information infrastructure and the activities of data process carried out by Internet platform operator that raise or may raise “national security” concerns are subject to strict cyber security review by Cybersecurity Review Office established by the CAC. Before critical information infrastructure operator purchases internet products and services, it should assess the potential risk of national security that may be caused by the use of such products and services. If such use of products and services may give raise to national security concerns, it should apply for a cybersecurity review by the Cybersecurity Review Office and a report of analysis of the potential effect on national security shall be submitted when the application is made. In addition, Internet platform operators that possess the personal data of over one million users must apply for a review by the Cybersecurity Review Office, if they plan to list their companies in foreign countries. The CAC may voluntarily conduct cyber security review if any network products and services and activities of data process affects or may affect national security. It may take approximately 70 business days in maximum for the general cybersecurity review upon the delivery of their applications, which may be subject to extensions for a special review. On July 7, 2022, the Measures for the Security Assessment of Outbound Data Transfers, or the Measures was published and became effective on September 1, 2022, which requires security assessment of outbound data transfers in cases, among others, outbound transfer of important data, outbound transfer of personal information by a critical information infrastructure operator or a personal information processor who has processed the personal information of more than one million people. For more details about the Measures, please see “Item 4.B. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Regulations— — Regulations Relating to Information Security and Censorship”. On September 24, 2024, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on the Network Data Security Management (the “Data Security Management Regulations”), which became effective on January 1, 2025. Pursuant to the Data Security Management Regulations, network data processing activities refer to activities such as the collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, provision, disclosure, and deletion of data. Network data processors refer to individuals or organizations that independently determine the purposes and methods of data processing activities. Network data processors conducting any data processing activities that affect or may affect national security shall undergo national security review in accordance with relevant national regulations. Where it is indeed necessary to transfer any important data collected and generated within the territory of the PRC to an overseas party, the security assessment of outbound data transfer organized by the national cyberspace administration department shall be passed. On October 28, 2025, the Standing Committee of the NPC adopted amendments to the Cybersecurity Law, which took effect on January 1, 2026. The revisions align the legal liability for personal information processing with the PIPL and other applicable laws, ensuring that breaches of personal data are subject to a cohesive legal framework. Furthermore, the amendments introduce a tiered penalty system: for violations with particularly serious consequences, companies may face fines of up to RMB10 million, and responsible individuals may face fines of up to RMB1 million. The amendments also expand the extraterritorial application of the Cybersecurity Law to cover overseas activities that endanger China’s cybersecurity. These developments indicate a continued regulatory focus on data protection and could impact our compliance costs and operational procedures, particularly concerning customer data handling and the potential designation of core business systems as critical information infrastructure. On September 11, 2025, the Cyberspace Administration of China promulgated the Measures for the Administration of National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting, which took effect on November 1, 2025. These measures require that network operators engaged in network construction, operation, or network-based service provision within the territory of the People’s Republic of China shall report cybersecurity incidents in accordance with the provisions thereof once such incidents occur. In particular, for cybersecurity incidents at or above the “relatively significant level”, network operators shall promptly report to the local provincial-level cyberspace administration department, and in any event, such reporting shall not be delayed for more than four hours.

The PRC operating entities currently does not have over one million users’ personal information and does not anticipate that it will be collecting over one million users’ personal information in the foreseeable future and the PRC operating entities do not conduct any data processing activities that affect or may affect national security; further, the PRC operating entities’ business operations do not involve any Critical Information Infrastructure, and neither we nor the PRC operating entities have received any notification from applicable PRC governmental authorities indicating that any of the PRC operating entities’ products or services is determined as the Critical Information Infrastructure. As of the date of this annual report, neither we nor the PRC operating entities have received any notification from applicable PRC governmental authorities indicating that we or the PRC operating entities shall file for a cybersecurity review.

However, as there remains uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of relevant PRC cybersecurity laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that the PRC regulators will reach the same conclusion as we and our PRC legal counsel. If in the future, the PRC regulators require us or the PRC operating entities to apply for a cybersecurity review, we cannot assure you that we or the PRC operating entities are able to pass such review. In addition, we and the PRC operating entities could become subject to enhanced cybersecurity review or investigations launched by PRC regulators in the future. Any failure or delay in the completion of the cybersecurity review procedures or any other non-compliance with the related laws and regulations may result in fines or other penalties, including suspension the PRC operating entities’ business, website closure, removal of our app from the relevant app stores, and revocation of prerequisite licenses, as well as reputational damage or legal proceedings or actions against us and the PRC operating entities, which may have material adverse effect on ours and the PRC operating entities’ business, financial condition or results of operations and cause the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or be worthless.

We rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiary to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiary to make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.

We are a holding company, and we rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiary for our cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders and service any debt we may incur. If our PRC subsidiary incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require our PRC subsidiary to adjust its taxable income, in a manner that would materially and adversely affect their ability to pay dividends and other distributions to us.

Under PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiary, as wholly foreign-owned enterprise in China, may pay dividends only out of their respective accumulated after-tax profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise is required to set aside at least 10% of its accumulated after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such funds reaches 50% of its registered capital. At the discretion of its shareholders, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise may allocate a portion of its after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to fund an optional reserve. These reserve funds and the discretionary funds are not distributable as cash dividends.

In response to the persistent capital outflow and the Renminbi’s depreciation against the U.S. dollar in the fourth quarter of 2016, the People’s Bank of China and SAFE have implemented a series of capital control measures, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. The PRC government may continue to strengthen its capital controls and our PRC subsidiary’s dividends and other distributions may be subjected to tighter scrutiny in the future. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiary to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

There are significant uncertainties under the EIT Law relating to the withholding tax liabilities of our PRC subsidiary, and dividends payable by our PRC subsidiary to our offshore subsidiaries may not qualify to enjoy certain treaty benefits.

Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law (the “EIT Law”) and its implementation rules, the profits of a foreign invested enterprise generated through operations, which are distributed to its immediate holding company outside the PRC, will be subject to a withholding tax rate of 10%. Pursuant to a special arrangement between Hong Kong and the PRC, such rate may be reduced to 5% if a Hong Kong resident enterprise owns more than 25% of the equity interest in the PRC company. Our PRC subsidiary is wholly-owned by our Hong Kong subsidiary. Moreover, under the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues regarding the Administration of the Dividend Provision in Tax Treaties promulgated on February 20, 2009, the taxpayer needs to satisfy certain conditions to enjoy the benefits under a tax treaty. These beneficial owners of the relevant dividends and the corporate shareholder to receive dividends from the PRC subsidiary must have continuously met the direct ownership thresholds during the 12 consecutive months preceding the receipt of the dividends. Based on the Notice of the State Taxation Administration on the Recognition of Beneficial Owners in Tax Treaties, which was promulgated by STA on February 3, 2018 and came into effect on April 1, 2018, a comprehensive analysis will be used to determine beneficial ownership based on the actual situation of a specific case combined with certain principles, and if an applicant was obliged to pay more than 50% of its income to a third country (region) resident within 12 months of the receipt of the income, or the business activities undertaken by an applicant did not constitute substantive business activities including substantive manufacturing, distribution, management and other activities, the applicant was unlikely to be recognized as a beneficial owner to enjoy tax treaty benefits. In current practice, a Hong Kong enterprise must obtain a tax resident certificate from the relevant Hong Kong tax authority to apply for the 5% lower PRC withholding tax rate. As the Hong Kong tax authority will issue such a tax resident certificate on a case-by-case basis, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the tax resident certificate from the relevant Hong Kong tax authority. As of the date of this annual report, we have not commenced the application process for a Hong Kong tax resident certificate from the relevant Hong Kong tax authority, and there is no assurance that we will be granted such a Hong Kong tax resident certificate. Even after we obtain the Hong Kong tax resident certificate, we are required by applicable tax laws and regulations to file required forms and materials with relevant PRC tax authorities to prove that we can enjoy 5% lower PRC withholding tax rate. We intend to obtain the required materials and file with the relevant tax authorities when it plans to declare and pay dividends, but there is no assurance that the PRC tax authorities will approve the 5% withholding tax rate on dividends received from Juxing HK, incorporated in Hong Kong.

PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay or prevent us from using the proceeds of our offshore offerings to make loans to or make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiary and VIE which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Any funds we transfer to our PRC subsidiary the Pengze WFOE, either as a shareholder loan or as an increase in registered capital, are subject to approval by or registration or filing with relevant governmental authorities in China. According to the relevant PRC regulations on foreign-invested enterprises, or FIEs, in China, capital contributions to the Pengze WFOE are subject to registration with State Administration for Market Regulation in its local branches, report submission to the Ministry of Commerce in its local branches and registration with a local bank authorized by SAFE. In addition, any foreign loans by us to Pengze WFOE or the VIE cannot exceed a statutory limit and is required to be registered with the SAFE or its local branches. We may not obtain these government approvals or complete such registrations on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future capital contributions or foreign loans by us to Pengze WFOE and VIE. If we fail to receive such approvals or complete such registration or filing, our ability to use the proceeds of our offshore offerings and to capitalize our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business. On March 30, 2015, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Reforming the Management Approach Regarding the Foreign Exchange Capital Settlement of Foreign-Invested Enterprises or SAFE Circular 19. SAFE Circular 19 launched a nationwide reform of the administration of the settlement of the foreign exchange capitals of FIEs and allows FIEs to settle their foreign exchange capital at their discretion but prohibit FIEs from using the Renminbi fund converted from their foreign exchange capitals for expenditure beyond their business scopes, providing entrusted loans or repaying loans between non-financial enterprises. SAFE further promulgated Circular on Reforming and Regulating the Policies for the Administration of Foreign Exchange Settlement under the Capital Account or SAFE Circular 16, effective on June 9, 2016, it is stipulated that if the content of the SAFE Circular 16 is inconsistent with the content of SAFE Circular 19, the SAFE Circular 16 shall prevail. SAFE Circulars 19 and 16 both prohibit FIEs from using the Renminbi fund converted from their foreign exchange capitals for expenditure beyond their business scopes or for investment and financing other than equity investment or investment in guaranteed products issued by banks, and also prohibit FIEs from using such Renminbi fund to provide loans to persons other than affiliates or constructing or purchasing real estate not for self-use, unless otherwise permitted under its business scope. As a result, we are required to apply Renminbi funds converted from the net proceeds we received from our offshore offerings within the business scopes of our PRC subsidiary. SAFE Circular 19 and 16 may limit our ability to transfer to and use in China the net proceeds from our offshore offerings, which may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Restrictions on currency exchange under PRC Laws may limit our ability to convert cash derived from our operating activities into foreign currencies and may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of Renminbi into foreign currencies. We receive substantially all of our revenue in Renminbi and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. Under our current corporate structure, our income is primarily derived from dividend payments from Pengze WFOE. Shortages in the availability of foreign currency may restrict the ability of Pengze WFOE to remit sufficient foreign currency to pay dividends or other payments to us, or otherwise satisfy their foreign currency denominated obligations, if any.

Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, conversion of Renminbi is permitted, without prior approval from the SAFE, for current account transactions, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions, as long as certain procedural requirements are complied with. However, approval from and registration with the SAFE, other PRC regulatory authorities or designated banks are required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China for capital account transactions, which includes foreign direct investment and repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may also restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. Any existing and future restrictions on currency exchange in China may limit our ability to convert cash derived from our operating activities into foreign currencies to fund expenditures denominated in foreign currencies. If the foreign exchange restrictions in China prevent us from obtaining US dollars or other foreign currencies as required, we may not be able to pay dividends in US dollars or other foreign currencies to our shareholders, or pay to suppliers and contractors in currencies other than Renminbi.

Furthermore, foreign exchange control in respect of the capital account transactions could affect our PRC subsidiary’ ability to obtain foreign exchange or conversion into Renminbi through debt or equity financing, including by means of loans or capital contributions from us.

Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

The value of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies fluctuates, is subject to changes resulting from the PRC government’s policies and depends to a large extent on domestic and international economic and political developments as well as supply and demand in the local market. With the development of the foreign exchange market and progress toward interest rate liberalization and Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future announce further changes to the exchange rate system, and we cannot assure you that the Renminbi will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the Hong Kong dollar or the U.S. dollar in the future.

Substantially all of our revenue and costs are denominated in Renminbi and most of our financial assets are also denominated in Renminbi. We rely entirely on dividends and other fees paid to us by our PRC subsidiary and the VIE. Our proceeds from our offshore offerings was denominated in dollars. Any significant change in the exchange rates of the dollar against Renminbi may materially and adversely affect the value of and any dividends payable on, our Shares in dollars. For example, a further appreciation of Renminbi against the dollar would make any new Renminbi-denominated investments or expenditures more costly to us, to the extent that we need to convert dollars into Renminbi for such purposes. An appreciation of Renminbi against the dollar would also result in foreign currency translation losses for financial reporting purposes when we translate our dollar denominated financial assets into Renminbi. Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our Shares or for other business purposes, appreciation of the dollar against Renminbi would have a negative effect on the dollar amount available to us.

Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar while the functional currency for our PRC operating entities is RMB. Gains and losses from the re-measurement of assets and liabilities that are receivable or payable in RMB are included in our consolidated statements of operations. The re-measurement has caused the U.S. dollar value of our results of operations to vary with exchange rate fluctuations, and the U.S. dollar value of our results of operations will continue to vary with exchange rate fluctuations. A fluctuation in the value of RMB relative to the U.S. dollar could reduce our profits from operations and the translated value of our net assets when reported in U.S. dollars in our consolidated financial statements. This could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations as reported in U.S. dollars. In addition, fluctuations in currencies relative to the periods in which the earnings are generated may make it more difficult to perform period-to-period comparisons of our reported results of operations.

Very limited hedging options in China are available to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any material hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency.

The enforcement of the PRC Labor Contract Law and other labor-related regulations in the PRC may adversely affect our, and VIE’s business and results of operations.

The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress enacted the Labor Contract Law in 2008, and amended it on December 28, 2012. The Labor Contract Law introduced specific provisions related to fixed-term labor contracts, part-time employment, probationary periods, consultation with Labor unions and employee assemblies, employment without a written contract, dismissal of employees, severance, and collective bargaining to enhance previous PRC Labor Jaws. Under the Labor Contract Law, an employer is obligated to sign an unlimited-term Labor contract with any employee who has worked for the employer for ten consecutive years. Further, if an employee requests or agrees to renew a fixed-term Labor contract that has already been entered into twice consecutively, the resulting contract, with certain exceptions, must have an unlimited term, subject to certain exceptions. With certain exceptions, an employer must pay severance to an employee where a Labor contract is terminated or expires. In addition, the PRC governmental authorities have continued to introduce various new Labor-related regulations since the effectiveness of the Labor Contract Law.

Under the PRC Social Insurance Law and the Administrative Measures on Housing Fund, employees are required to participate in pension insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance, and housing funds and employers are required, together with their employees or separately, to pay the social insurance premiums and housing funds for their employees. If the VIE fails to make adequate social insurance and housing fund contributions, the VIE may be subject to fines and legal sanctions, and our, and VIE’s business, financial conditions and results of operations may be adversely affected.

These laws designed to enhance labor protection tend to increase VIE’s labor costs. In addition, as the interpretation and implementation of these regulations are still evolving, VIE’s employment practices may not be at all times be deemed in compliance with the regulations. As a result, the VIE could be subject to penalties or incur significant liabilities in connection with labor disputes or investigations.

VIE’s failure to fully comply with PRC labor-related laws may expose it to potential penalties.

Companies operating in China are required to participate in various government sponsored employee benefit plans, including certain social insurance, housing funds and other welfare-oriented payment obligations, and contribute to the plans in amounts equal to certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of our employees up to a maximum amount specified by the local government from time to time at locations where the companies operate its businesses. The requirement of employee benefit plans has not been implemented consistently by the local governments in China given the different levels of economic development in different locations. The VIE and some of its subsidiaries have not paid social insurance and housing provident fund in strict compliance with the relevant PRC regulations for and on behalf of their employees and/or have not carried out social insurance registration and housing provident fund deposit registration as required by PRC laws as of the date of this annual report The VIE and its subsidiaries may be subject to penalties for its failure to make payments in accordance with the applicable PRC laws and regulations, or rectification as required by the relevant governmental authorities. The VIE and its subsidiaries may be required to make up the contributions for social insurance and housing provident fund and/or to pay late fees and fines. We have not made any accruals for penalties that may be imposed by the relevant PRC governmental authorities in the financial statements. As of the date of this annual report, the VIE and its subsidiaries have not received any notification from the PRC governmental authorities requiring us to pay any outstanding amount of the social insurance and housing provident fund contributions. Though our management considers the likelihood that we are required by the PRC governmental authorities to make additional payment for the above mentioned amount wholly is low. If the VIE or any of its subsidiaries is subject to fines in relation to the underpaid employee benefits, our, and the financial condition and results of operations of the VIE or its subsidiaries may be adversely affected.

Further, Pursuant to the PRC Labor Contract Law, or the Labor Contract Law, that became effective in January 2008 and was last amended in December 2012 and its implementing rules that became effective in September 2008, as well as other relevant labor laws and regulations, the VIE and its subsidiaries are subject to stricter requirements in terms of, among others, signing labor contracts, minimum wages, paying remuneration, determining the term of employees’ probation and unilaterally terminating labor contracts. As of the date of this annual report, some employees signed labor contracts with several PRC operating entities but actually work for different PRC operating entities, it may be considered that the actual employers have failed to sign labor contracts with the employees. Under the PRC laws, if the employer fails to conclude a written labor contract with the employee within one month but less than one year from the date of employment, it shall pay twice the monthly salary to the employee. If the VIE or its subsidiaries are unable to comply with labor-related laws and regulations in China, it may be subject to compensations, liabilities, penalties, labor disputes or government investigations. If the VIE or its subsidiaries are deemed to have violated relevant labor laws and regulations, it could be required to provide additional compensation to the employees and subject to fines or any penalties, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Failure to obtain or renew relevant requisite licenses, permits, authorization, approvals or certificates from the relevant government authorities related to our business operation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business and our financial conditions.

Our business operation in the PRC is subject to various licenses, permits, authorization, approvals or certificates from or completion of relevant filings, registration with, or reports to the relevant governmental authorities, including, but not limited to, the Value-added telecommunications business license, Human resource services license, Labor dispatch business license, and Road transport business license.

Gongwuyuan started to operate the employment platform and published employment information as well as conducted other activities related to the operation of value-added telecommunication business from March 2019, but did not obtain the value-added telecommunication business operation license (“ICP License”) until February 2020. According to the Administrative Measures for Internet Information Services, to engage in commercial Internet information services, the operator shall apply for an ICP License, if such operator do not obtain an ICP License but engage in commercial Internet information services without authorization, the competent government authorizations may order corrections within a time limit, confiscate the illegal gains (if any), impose a fine and if the circumstances are serious, the website shall be ordered to close. As of the date of this annul report, Gongwuyuan has not been penalized nor inspected by relevant governmental authorities in connection with the abovementioned late acquisition of the ICP License. While under the Law of the PRC on Administrative Penalties, where an unlawful act is not discovered within two years of its commission, an administrative penalty shall not be imposed, the law further provides that in cases where citizens’ life and health security or financial security is involved and harmful consequences are caused, the above-mentioned two-year period shall be extended to five years. Therefore it remains uncertain whether the relevant governmental authority would initiate investigations on the late obtaining of ICP license by Gongwuyuan or impose penalties on this regard in the future, if so, our ability to conduct our business and our financial conditions could be adversely affected. In addition, Gongwuyuan started to provide human resources services from April 2020 without completion of relevant filings with the competent administrative authority for human resources, which was completed by Gongwuyuan in January 2021 by obtaining a filing certificate (updated into a human resource services license in April 2024). Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, Gongwuyuan could be ordered by the competent authorities to make corrections, impose fines and other penalties for failure to compete the filing procedures in relation to its human resources services in a timely manner.

Further, as of the date of this annul report, some subsidiaries of Gongwuyuan have not successfully completed the reporting procedures in writing to the local administrative authority for human resources for establishing branches that engaged in human resources services, and have not completed the reporting and filing procedures for establishing branches that engaged in labor dispatching services. Besides, some subsidiaries of Gongwuyuan, which no longer engaged in relevant business or has obtained relevant permissions as of the date of this annul report, had provided human resources services and labor dispatching services without completion of relevant permission and filing procedures. Under the PRC Laws, for failure to complete the reporting or filing procedures for establishing branches that engaged in human resources services or labor dispatching services, the relevant subsidiaries may be ordered by the competent authorities to make corrections, confiscate illegal income, impose fines, be closed or other penalties under the PRC laws. For any entity engages in employment agency activities without permission, such entity may be ordered by the competent authorities to make corrections, confiscate illegal income, impose fines or be closed; for any entity engaging in human resources service but failed to complete the filing procedures, it may be ordered to rectify and a fine would be imposed if the rectification is not made within the time limit. For any entity engages in labor dispatching services without permission, such entity may be ordered by the competent authorities to cease legal activities, confiscate illegal income and impose fines. Any entity that engages in road transport business without obtaining a road transport business license may be ordered by the competent transportation department to stop the business operation, confiscate the illegal income and impose a fine and other penalties under the PRC laws. As of the date of this annul report, none of Gongwuyuan’s subsidiaries have been subject to penalties or investigations in connection with failure to obtain the abovementioned licenses or permits or complete the foregoing reporting or filing procedures. However, there is no assurance that the subsidiaries will not receive penalties or be subject to investigation in this connection in the future. Any penalty or investigation imposed by relevant governmental authority on such subsidiaries due to the aforementioned matter in the future could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business and our financial conditions. Further, if any of our PRC subsidiary, the VIE or its subsidiaries fails to obtain or renew any license, permit, authorization, approval or certificate related to its business operation, it could be subject to penalties or investigations from the relevant government authorities, which would materially and adversely affect our business operation and financial conditions.

Failure by the VIE or its subsidiaries to comply with tax laws or regulations, or lose their favorable tax treatments could subject us supplemental tax payment, higher tax liabilities or even penalties.

Companies established in the PRC are subject to various tax liabilities, procedures and other requirements. In particular, PRC companies are required to complete tax registration after their incorporation and make tax declaration regularly or otherwise as stipulated by relevant laws and regulations. Some of the PRC operating companies failed to complete tax registration and tax declaration on time. According to Law of the PRC on the Administration of Tax Collection, each of the PRC operating entities that failed to complete tax registration and tax declaration may be ordered by the tax authorities to make corrections within a time limit and imposed a fine up to RMB10,000. If the VIE or its subsidiaries fail to comply with relevant tax laws or regulations, they may be subject to supplemental tax payment, late pay fees, fines or other penalties.

Moreover, some of the PRC operating companies enjoy preferential tax treatment under PRC tax laws and regulations. For example, the VIE’s subsidiaries Jiangxi Gongwuyuan Talent Service Co., Ltd and Huizhong Human Resources Co., Ltd (collectively, the “Jiangxi Companies”) enjoy the preferential policy of value-added tax. While Jiangxi Companies signed business contracts and gain incomes, services under the business contracts were actually provided by employees of other PRC operating companies for Jiangxi Company’s customers without entering into written contracts between Jiangxi Companies and other PRC operating companies. If the abovementioned arrangement is considered to enjoy tax benefits through transfer pricing by the PRC operating companies, the competent PRC government authority may make tax adjustments and ask for additional tax payment. Besides, if the PRC operating companies were to lose the benefit of the favorable tax treatment they currently enjoy in the future, we could see significant increases in the amount of taxes we pay, hence our operating results could be materially harmed, even in the absence of a decrease in our operations.

Uncertainties exist with respect to the enactment timetable, interpretation and implementation of the laws and regulations with respect to online platform business operation.

The VIE’s online recruitment and crowdsourcing application may be deemed an online platform. As such, the PRC operating entities may be subject to various internet-related laws and regulations. These internet-related laws and regulations are relatively new and involving, and their enactment timetable, interpretation and implementation involve uncertaities.

For example, On February 7, 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation, or the SAMR, promulgated Guidelines to Anti-Monopoly in the Field of Platform Economy, or the Anti-Monopoly Guidelines for Platform Economy. The Anti-Monopoly Guidelines for Platform Economy provides operational standards and guidelines for identifying certain internet platforms’ abuse of market dominant position which are prohibited to restrict unfair competition and safeguard users’ interests, including without limitation, prohibiting personalized pricing using big data and analytics, selling products below cost without reasonable causes, actions or arrangements seen as exclusivity arrangements, using technology means to block competitors’ interface, using bundle services to sell services or products. In addition, internet platforms’ compulsory collection of user data may be viewed as abuse of dominant market position that may have the effect to eliminate or restrict competition. As of the date of this Annual report, neither we nor the PRC operating entities have been subject to any anti-monopoly investigation, penalty of litigation initiated by government authorities or third parties. Furthermore, we will continue to attach attention to the updates of applicable PRC laws and regulations in relation to antimonopoly.

On August 31, 2018, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the E-commerce Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2019. The E-commerce Law imposes a series of requirements on e-commerce operators including e-commerce platform operators, merchants operating on the platform and the individuals and entities carrying out business online. The governance measures our PRC subsidiary adopted in response to the enhanced regulatory requirements may fail to meet these requirements and may lead to penalties or our loss of merchants to those platforms, or to complaints or claims made against us by customers on our platforms.

In addition, the PRC operating entities may be subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations regarding privacy and data protection. For more details, please see “Item 3.D. Key Information—Risk Factors— Risks Relating to Doing Business In China — The PRC operating entities may be liable for improper collection, use or appropriation of personal information provided by our customers and users.”

The approval of the China Securities Regulatory Commission or other PRC regulatory agencies may be required in connection with our offshore offerings under PRC law.

The Regulations on Mergers of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, purport to require offshore special purpose vehicles that are controlled by PRC companies or individuals and that have been formed for the purpose of seeking a public listing on an overseas stock exchange through acquisitions of PRC domestic companies or assets to obtain CSRC approval prior to publicly listing their securities on an overseas stock exchange. The interpretation and application of the regulations involve uncertainties. If CSRC approval is required, it is uncertain how long it will take for us to obtain such approval, and any failure to obtain or a delay in obtaining CSRC approval for this registration may subject us to sanctions imposed by the CSRC and other PRC regulatory agencies.

Based on its understanding of the PRC Laws and our corporate structure up to the date of this annual report, it is of the opinion that we are not required to apply for the CSRC approval prescribed under the M&A Rules in connection with our offshore offerings. However, there remains uncertainty as to how the M&A Rules will be interpreted or implemented, and the opinions summarized above will be subject to any new PRC laws, rules and regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations in any form relating to an overseas listing of SPVs like the Company. We cannot assure you that relevant PRC government agencies, including the CSRC, would reach the same conclusion as our PRC legal counsel does. If it is determined that CSRC approval under the M&A Rules is required, or if we inadvertently conclude that such approval is not required when it is, we may face sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies for failure to obtain or delay in obtaining CSRC approval for the sale of securities. These sanctions may include fines and penalties on our operations in China, limitations on our operating privileges in China, delays in or restrictions on the repatriation of the proceeds from our offshore offerings into the PRC, restrictions on or prohibition of the payments or remittance of dividends by our subsidiaries in China, or other actions that could have a material and adverse effect on our business financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of our securities.

In addition, on February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued the New Administrative Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, which came into force on March 31, 2023. According to the New Administrative Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, among other things, a domestic company in the PRC that seeks to offer and list securities on overseas markets shall fulfill the filing procedures with the CSRC as per requirement of the Trial Administrative Measures. Where a domestic company seeks to directly offer and list securities on overseas markets, the issuer shall file with the CSRC. Where a domestic company seeks to indirectly offer and list securities on overseas markets, the issuer shall designate a major domestic operating entity, which shall, as the domestic responsible entity, file with the CSRC. Initial public offerings or listings on overseas markets shall be filed with the CSRC within 3 working days after the relevant application is submitted overseas. The required filing materials with the CSRC include (without limitation): (i) record-filing reports and related undertakings; (ii) compliance certificates, filing or approval documents from the primary regulators of applicants’ businesses (if applicable); (iii) security assessment opinions issued by related departments (if applicable); (iv) PRC legal opinions issued by domestic law firms (with related undertakings); and (v) prospectus or listing documents. Pursuant to the New Administrative Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, we have filed with the CSRC with respect to our initial public offering in March 2025. We completed such filing procedures on June 27, 2024, the completion of which was posted on the official website of the CSRC on June 28, 2024. However, we cannot assure you of whether there will be further regulatory requirements related to overseas securities offerings and other capital markets activities. Any failure on our part to fully comply with further regulatory requirements may significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer our Class A Ordinary Shares.

Furthermore, on July 6, 2021, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly promulgated the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities in Accordance with the Law, pursuant to which PRC regulators are required to accelerate rulemaking related to overseas issuance and listing of securities, and improvement to the laws and regulations related to data security, cross-border data flow, and management of confidential information. Numerous regulations, guidelines and other measures have been or are expected to be adopted under the umbrella of or in addition to the Cybersecurity Law and Data Security Law, including (i) the Measures for the Security Assessment of Outbound Data Transfers, or the Measures published by the CAC, in July 2022, which requires security review before transferring personal information or important date out of China, and (ii) Measures for Cybersecurity Review (2021) which provides that, among others, an application for cybersecurity review shall be made by an issuer who is a critical information infrastructure operator or a data processing operator as defined therein before such issuer’s listing in a foreign country if the issuer possesses personal information of more than one million users, and that the relevant governmental authorities in the PRC may initiate cybersecurity review if such governmental authorities determine an operator’s cyber products or services, data processing or potential listing in a foreign country affect or may affect national security. As there are still uncertainties regarding the interpretation and implementation of such regulatory guidance, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with new regulatory requirements relating to our future overseas capital raising activities and our PRC subsidiary may become subject to more stringent requirements with respect to matters including data privacy, and cross-border investigation and enforcement of legal claims.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, as of the date of this report, except as disclosed in the “Item 3.D. Key Information—Risk Factors—” , “Item 3.D. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business In China — We are subject to PRC laws or regulations that govern our industry; — The approval of the China Securities Regulatory Commission or other PRC regulatory agencies may be required in connection with our offshore offerings under PRC law,” there are no PRC laws and regulations in force explicitly requiring that we or the VIE obtain any permission from PRC authorities to issue securities to foreign investors, and we have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanction or any regulatory objection to this registration from the CSRC, the CAC or any other PRC authorities that have jurisdiction over our operations. Based on the above and our understanding of the current PRC laws and regulations, as of the date of this annual report, we are not required to submit an application to the CAC for the approval of our offshore offerings. However, our PRC legal counsel has further advised us that the enactment, interpretation and implementation of regulatory requirements related to overseas securities registration and other capital markets activities are still subject to change. If it is determined in the future that the CAC or other approval were required for our offshore offerings, our PRC subsidiary may face sanctions by the CAC or other PRC regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our operations in China, limit our ability to pay dividends outside of China, limit our operations in China, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from this registration into China or take other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading price of the Stocks. The CAC or other PRC regulatory agencies also may take actions requiring us, or making it advisable for us, to halt this registration before settlement and delivery of the Stocks. Consequently, if you engage in market trading or other activities in anticipation of and prior to settlement and delivery, you do so at the risk that settlement and delivery may not occur. In addition, if the CAC or other regulatory agencies later promulgate new rules requiring that our PRC subsidiary obtaining their approvals for this registration, we may be unable to obtain a waiver of such approval requirements, if and when procedures are established to obtain such a waiver. Any uncertainties and/or negative publicity regarding such an approval requirement could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

As of the date of this annual report, we or the PRC operating entities have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanctions or regulatory objection to our offshore offerings from the CSRC or any other PRC governmental authorities.

PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident beneficial owners or our PRC subsidiary to liability or penalties, limit our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiary, limit our PRC subsidiary’s ability to increase their registered capital or distribute profits to us, or may otherwise adversely affect us.

The Circular on Relevant Issues Relating to Domestic Resident’s Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles or SAFE Circular 37 was promulgated by the SAFE in July 2014 that requires PRC residents or entities to register with SAFE or its local branch, currently with local bank according to Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Simplifying and Improving Policies for the Foreign Exchange Administration of Direct Investment issued by SAFE on February 13, 2015, in connection with their establishment or control of an offshore entity established for the purpose of overseas investment or financing. In addition, any PRC resident who is a direct or indirect shareholder of an offshore company is required to update the previously filed registration with the local branch of the SAFE, with respect to that offshore company, to reflect any material change involving its round-trip investment, capital variation, such as an increase or decrease in capital, transfer or swap of shares, merger or division. These regulations apply to our shareholders who are PRC residents and may apply to any offshore acquisitions that we make in the future.

We have requested PRC residents holding direct or indirect interest in us to make the necessary applications, filings and amendments as required by applicable foreign exchange regulations. We are committed to complying with and to ensuring that our shareholders known to us who are subject to such regulations will comply with the relevant SAFE rules and regulations. However, due to uncertainties in the implementation of the regulatory requirements by PRC authorities, such registration might not be always practically available in all circumstances as prescribed in those regulations. In addition, we may not always be able to compel shareholder to comply with SAFE Circular 37 or other related regulations. We cannot assure you that the SAFE or its local branches will release explicit requirements or interpret the relevant PRC Laws otherwise. Failure by any such shareholders to comply with SAFE Circular 37 may result in restrictions on the foreign exchange activities of the relevant PRC enterprise and may also subject the relevant PRC resident to penalties under the PRC foreign exchange administration regulations. To the best of our knowledge, as of the date of this annual report, our shareholders who are being subject to SAFE regulations have completed all necessary registrations required by the SAFE Circular 37.

If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders.

Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules, an enterprise established outside of the PRC with its “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a “resident enterprise” and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. The implementation rules define the term “de facto management body” as the body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In 2009, the State Administration of Taxation issued a circular, SAT Circular 82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a PRC-controlled enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in China. One of the criteria is that a company’s major assets, accounting books and minutes and files of its board and shareholders’ meetings are located or kept in the PRC. In addition, the State Administration of Taxation issued a bulletin on 3 August 2011, effective from September 1, 2011 and amended in June, 2018, providing more guidance on the implementation of the SAT Circular 82. This bulletin clarifies matters including residence status determination, post-determination administration and competent tax authorities. Although both the SAT Circular 82 and the bulletin only apply to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the State Administration of Taxation’s general position on how the “de facto management body” text should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all offshore enterprises.

We believe none of our entities outside of China is a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body”. As substantially all of our management members are based in China, it remains unclear how the tax residency rule will apply to our case. If the PRC tax authorities determine that our Company or any of our subsidiaries outside of China is a PRC resident enterprise for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, then our Company or such subsidiary could be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 25% on its world-wide income, which could materially reduce our net income. In addition, we will also be subject to PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. Furthermore, if the PRC tax authorities determine that we are a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, gains realized on the sale or other disposition of our shares may be subject to PRC tax, at a rate of 10% in the case of non-PRC enterprises or 20% in the case of non-PRC individuals (in each case, subject to the provisions of any applicable tax treaty), if such gains are deemed to be from PRC sources. It is unclear whether non-PRC shareholders of our Company would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that we are treated as a PRC resident enterprise. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in our Shares.

It may be difficult to effect service of process upon our Directors or officers named in this annual report who reside in mainland China or enforce non-mainland China court judgements against us or them.

Substantially all of our assets are situated in mainland China, and most of our Directors and officers named in this annual report reside in, and most of their respective assets are located in, mainland China. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process outside mainland China upon most of our Directors and officers, including with respect to matters arising under applicable securities laws.

In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands or the PRC, respectively, would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state. In addition, it is uncertain whether such Cayman Islands or PRC courts would entertain original actions brought in the courts of the Cayman Islands or the PRC against us or such persons predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state.

Specifically, regarding judgment enforcement in the PRC, the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other forms of reciprocal arrangement with the United States that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, the PRC courts will not enforce a foreign judgements against us or our directors and officers if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security or public interest of the PRC. As a result, it is uncertain whether and how a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the U.S. or the Cayman Islands.

Failure to comply with relevant regulation regarding VIE’s leased premises may cause interruptions to VIE’s business operations.

As of the date of this annual report, some of the lessors of properties leased by the VIE and its subsidiaries failed to provide the relevant building ownership certificates, as a result of which, there may be risks that this lease may be held invalid, and therefore the VIE or its subsidiaries may not be able to continue to occupy and use such property. The VIE or its subsidiaries may be forced to relocate. We cannot assure you that the VIE or its subsidiaries will be able to find suitable replacement site on terms acceptable to it on a timely basis.

In addition, some leased properties have not been registered with the relevant PRC governmental authorities as required by the relevant laws of the PRC. The failure to register leasehold interests will not affect the validity and enforceability of the lease agreement under the laws of the PRC and a maximum penalty of RMB10,000 may be imposed for non-registration of each leased property.

Risks Relating to the Class A Ordinary Shares

A recent joint statement by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or the “PCAOB,” proposed rule changes submitted by Nasdaq, and an act passed by the U.S. Senate all call for additional and more stringent criteria to be applied to emerging market companies upon assessing the qualification of their auditors, especially the non-U.S. auditors who are not inspected by the PCAOB. These developments could add uncertainties to our listing on Nasdaq in the future. 

On April 21, 2020, the SEC and PCAOB released a joint statement highlighting the risks associated with investing in companies based in or having substantial operations in emerging markets including China. The joint statement emphasized the risks associated with lack of access for the PCAOB to inspect auditors and audit work papers in China and higher risks of fraud in emerging markets.

On May 18, 2020, Nasdaq filed three proposals with the SEC to (i) apply a minimum offering size requirement for companies primarily operating in a “Restrictive Market,” (ii) adopt a new requirement relating to the qualification of management or the board of directors for Restrictive Market companies, and (iii) apply additional and more stringent criteria to an applicant or listed company based on the qualifications of the company’s auditor.

On May 20, 2020, the U.S. Senate passed the HFCAA requiring a foreign company to certify it is not owned or manipulated by a foreign government if the PCAOB is unable to audit specified reports because the company uses a foreign auditor not subject to PCAOB inspection. If the PCAOB is unable to inspect the company’s auditor for two (2) consecutive “non-inspection” years, the issuer’s securities are prohibited to trade on an U.S. national securities exchange.

On June 4, 2020, the U.S. President issued a memorandum ordering the President’s working group on financial markets to submit a report to the President within 60 days of the date of the memorandum that should include recommendations for actions that can be taken by the executive branch and by the SEC or PCAOB to enforce U.S. regulatory requirements on Chinese companies listed on a U.S. national securities exchange and their audit firms. However, it remains unclear what further actions, if any, the U.S. executive branch, the SEC, and PCAOB will take to address the problem. The lack of access to the PCAOB inspection in China prevents the PCAOB from fully evaluating audits and quality control procedures of the auditors based in China. As a result, investors may be deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of these accounting firm’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to the PCAOB inspections, which could cause investors and potential investors in our Class A Ordinary Shares to lose confidence in our audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our financial statements.

On March 24, 2021, the SEC announced that it adopted interim final amendments to implement congressionally mandated submission and disclosure requirements of the HFCAA. Under the new requirements, certain companies must establish that they are not owned or controlled by a foreign government entity and disclose any foreign government influence. These interim final amendments will apply to registrants that (i) the SEC identifies as having filed an annual report on Forms 10-K, 20-F, 40-F, or N-CSR with an audit report issued by a registered public accounting firm that is located in a foreign jurisdiction where (ii) the PCAOB has determined that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by an authority in that foreign jurisdiction. The interim final amendments define such registrants as “Commission-Identified Issuers” (CIIs). The interim final amendments will also apply to “Commission-Identified Foreign Issuers” (CIFIs), a subset of CIIs who are foreign issuers (as defined under the Exchange Act). CIFIs are subject to additional disclosure requirements under the HFCAA. The SEC will implement a process to identify which registrants and is assessing how to implement other requirements of the HFCAA, including the listing and trading prohibition requirements described above.

On August 26, 2022, the PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol with the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or the CSRC, and the Ministry of Finance of the PRC, taking the first step toward opening access for the PCAOB to inspect and investigate registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it “was able to secure complete access to inspect and investigate audit firms in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the first time in history, in 2022. Therefore, on December 15, 2022, the PCAOB Board voted to vacate previous determinations to the contrary.” Notwithstanding the foregoing, uncertainties exist with respect to the implementation of these provisions and there is no assurance that the PCAOB will be able to execute, in a timely manner, its future inspections and investigations in a manner that satisfies the Statement of Protocol.

On December 29, 2022, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, was signed into law, which amended the HFCAA (i) to reduce the number of consecutive years that would trigger delisting from three years to two years, and (ii) so that any foreign jurisdiction could be the reason why the PCAOB does not to have complete access to inspect or investigate a company’s auditors. As it was originally enacted, the HFCAA applied only if the PCAOB’s inability to inspect or investigate because of a position taken by an authority in the foreign jurisdiction where the relevant public accounting firm is located. As a result of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, the HFCAA now also applies if the PCAOB’s inability to inspect or investigate the relevant accounting firm is due to a position taken by an authority in any foreign jurisdiction. The denying jurisdiction does not need to be where the accounting firm is located.

Our former auditor, Friedman LLP, was an independent registered public accounting firm with the PCAOB, and as an auditor of publicly traded companies in the U.S., was subject to laws in the U.S. pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. Friedman LLP had been inspected by the PCAOB on a regular basis, with the last inspection in October 2020. Friedman LLP was merged with Marcum LLP on September 1, 2022 and filed its application to withdraw the PCAOB registration on December 30, 2022. On February 21, 2023, the Company engaged Kreit & Chiu CPA LLP (“Kreit & Chiu”) as its independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. We dismissed its independent auditor, Kreit & Chiu, which action was approved by Board of Directors on August 1, 2025. On August 1, 2025, we engaged Onestop Assurance PAC (“Onestop”) as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. Our current auditors, Onestop, is located at 180B Bencoolen Street 03-01, The Bencoolen Singapore 189648 , and has been inspected by the PCAOB The Company will not engage any independent public accounting firm headquartered in mainland China or Hong Kong or not subject to the PCAOB’s inspections. However, the above recent developments have added uncertainties to our continued listing on Nasdaq in the future, to which Nasdaq may apply additional and more stringent criteria after considering the effectiveness of our auditor’s audit and quality control procedures, adequacy of personnel and training, sufficiency of resources, geographic reach, and experience as related to our audit.

We cannot assure you that we will not be identified by the SEC as an issuer whose audit report is prepared by auditors that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate. We cannot assure you that, once we have a “non-inspection” year, we will be able to take remedial measures in a timely manner.

As a result of the foregoing legislative and regulatory developments in the United States, and we cannot assure you that we will always be able to maintain the listing of our Class A Ordinary Shares on a national stock exchange in the U.S., such as the Nasdaq Stock Market, or that you will always be allowed to trade our Class A Ordinary Shares.

Recent statements by the SEC on the PRC’s guidance and restrictions on China-based companies seeking to raise capital in the United States may raise scrutiny as to our operations and SEC disclosures.

In light of the PRC providing new guidance to and restrictions on China-based companies raising capital offshore, including PRC government-led cybersecurity reviews, the Chairman of the SEC has requested his staff to review disclosures from offshore issuers associated with China-based operating companies. In particular the SEC Chairman was concerned about an investor’s understanding of a VIE contract structure. We currently conduct our business in China utilizing a VIE contract structure, and, as a result, the SEC may raise scrutiny as to our operations and as to the adequacy of our disclosure as to the risks of our operating our business in this legal structure.

You must rely on the judgment of our management as to the use of the net proceeds from our offshore offerings, and such use may not produce income or increase our share price.

We anticipate that we will use the net proceeds from our offshore offerings for working capital and other corporate purposes and business opportunities that complement or enhance our existing operations. However, our management will have significant discretion as to the use of the net proceeds to us from our offshore offerings and could spend the net proceeds of our offshore offerings for corporate purposes or in ways that do not improve our results of operations or maintain profitability or increase the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. You will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether proceeds are being used appropriately.

Our Ordinary Share price may change significantly following our initial public offering regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your Class A Ordinary Shares at or above the initial public offering price.

The market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares may be highly volatile and may fluctuate or decline substantially as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

Furthermore, the stock market has experienced extreme volatility that in some cases has been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These and other factors may cause the market price and demand for our Class A Ordinary Shares to fluctuate substantially, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, in the past, when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have sometimes instituted securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock. If any of our shareholders were to bring a lawsuit against us, we could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit. Such a lawsuit could also divert the time and attention of our management from our business.

Because we are a foreign private issuer and are exempt from certain Nasdaq corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. issuers, you will have less protection than you would have if we were a domestic issuer.

Nasdaq Listing Rules require listed companies to have, among other things, a majority of its board members be independent. As a foreign private issuer, however, we are permitted to, and we may follow home country practice in lieu of the above requirements, or we may choose to comply with the above requirement within one year of listing. The corporate governance practice in our home country, the Cayman Islands, does not require a majority of our board to consist of independent directors. Thus, although a director must act in the best interests of the Company, it is possible that fewer board members will be exercising independent judgment and the level of board oversight on the management of our company may decrease as a result. In addition, the Nasdaq Listing Rules also require U.S. domestic issuers to have a compensation committee, a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors, and an audit committee with a minimum of three members. We, as a foreign private issuer, are not subject to these requirements. The Nasdaq Listing Rules may require shareholder approval for certain corporate matters, such as requiring that shareholders be given the opportunity to vote on all equity compensation plans and material revisions to those plans, certain ordinary share issuances. We intend to comply with the requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rules in determining whether shareholder approval is required on such matters and to appoint a nominating and corporate governance committee. However, we decide to follow our home country practice in lieu of the following Nasdaq Listing Rules: (1) Rule 5250(b)(3) which requires disclosure of third-party director and nominee compensation; and (2) Rule 5250(d) which requires the Company to distribute annual and interim reports. Other than the practice described above, there are no significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those followed by U.S. domestic companies under Nasdaq Stock Market Rules.

Nasdaq may apply additional and more stringent criteria for our initial and continued listing because we have a small public offering and insiders will hold a large portion of the company’s listed securities.

Nasdaq Listing Rule 5101 provides Nasdaq with broad discretionary authority over the initial and continued listing of securities on Nasdaq and Nasdaq may use such discretion to deny initial listing, apply additional or more stringent criteria for the initial or continued listing of particular securities, or suspend or delist particular securities based on any event, condition, or circumstance that exists or occurs that makes initial or continued listing of the securities on Nasdaq inadvisable or unwarranted in the opinion of Nasdaq, even though the securities meet all enumerated criteria for initial or continued listing on Nasdaq. In addition, Nasdaq has used its discretion to deny initial or continued listing or to apply additional and more stringent criteria in the instances, including but not limited to: (i) where the company engaged an auditor that has not been subject to an inspection by the PCAOB, an auditor that PCAOB cannot inspect, or an auditor that has not demonstrated sufficient resources, geographic reach, or experience to adequately perform the company’s audit; (ii) where the company planned a small public offering, which would result in insiders holding a large portion of the company’s listed securities. Nasdaq was concerned that the offering size was insufficient to establish the company’s initial valuation, and there would not be sufficient liquidity to support a public market for the company; and (iii) where the company did not demonstrate sufficient nexus to the U.S. capital market, including having no U.S. shareholders, operations, or members of the board of directors or management. Our initial public offering in March 2025 was relatively small and the insiders of our Company held a large portion of the company’s listed securities. Nasdaq might apply the additional and more stringent criteria for our initial and continued listing, which might cause delay or even denial of our listing application.

If we do not continue to satisfy the Nasdaq continued listing requirements, our Class A Ordinary Shares could be delisted.

The listing of our Class A Ordinary Shares on Nasdaq Capital Market is contingent on our compliance with Nasdaq’s conditions for continued listing. In the future, should we fail to meet Nasdaq’s listing rules, we may be subject to delisting. In the event our Class A Ordinary Shares are no longer listed for trading on Nasdaq, our trading volume and share price may decrease and we may experience difficulties in raising capital which could materially affect our operations and financial results. Further, delisting from Nasdaq could also have other negative effects, including potential loss of confidence by partners, lenders, suppliers and employees. Finally, delisting could make it harder for us to raise capital and sell securities.

We may lose our foreign private issuer status in the future, which could result in significant additional costs and expenses.

In order for us to maintain our current status as a foreign private issuer, a majority of our Shares must be either directly or indirectly owned by non-residents of the United States, unless we also satisfy all of the additional requirements necessary to preserve this status including (i) a majority of our board of directors and management are located outside the United States; (ii) more than 50 percent of our assets are located outside the United States; and (iii) our business is administered principally outside of the United States. We may in the future lose our foreign private issuer status if a majority of our Shares is held in the United States and we fail to meet the additional requirements necessary to avoid loss of foreign private issuer status. The regulatory and compliance costs under U.S. federal securities laws as a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly more than the costs incurred as a foreign private issuer. If we are no longer deemed to be a foreign private issuer, we will be required to file periodic and current reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer. In addition, we may lose the ability to rely upon certain exemptions from Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements that are available to foreign private issuers.

You may experience further dilution in the future.

If we issue additional Class A Ordinary Shares in the future, purchasers of our Class A Ordinary Shares in the offering may experience further dilution in their shareholding percentage.

We are an exempted company with limited liability incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and you may have different protection of your shareholder rights than you would have under United States law.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Memorandum and Articles of Association, as amended, the Companies Act (Revised) of the Cayman Islands, which we refer to as the Companies Act below and common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take legal action against our directors and us, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law may not be as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some jurisdictions in the United States, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies (other than copies of our Memorandum and Articles of Association, as amended, and register of mortgages and charges). Under Cayman Islands law, the names of our current directors can be obtained from a search conducted at the Registrar of Companies. Our directors have discretion under our Memorandum and Articles of association, as amended, to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from the NASDAQ corporate governance requirements; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to United States domestic issuers.

As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may encounter different issues in protecting their interests through actions against our management, directors or major shareholders compared to shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States.

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. We conduct our operations in China and substantially all of our assets are located in China. In addition, our directors and executive officers, and some of the experts named in this annual report, reside within China, and most of the assets of these persons are located within China. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of the PRC may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.

Cayman Islands economic substance requirements may have an effect on our business and operations.

Pursuant to the International Tax Cooperation (Economic Substance) Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands, or the ES Act, that came into force on January 1, 2019, a “relevant entity” is required to satisfy the economic substance test set out in the ES Act. A “relevant entity” includes a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands as is our Company. Based on the current interpretation of the ES Act, we believe that our Company is a pure equity holding company since it only holds equity participation in other entities and only earns dividends and capital gains. Accordingly, for so long as our Company is a “pure equity holding company”, it is only subject to the minimum substance requirements, which require us to (i) comply with all applicable filing requirements under the Companies Act; and (ii) has adequate human resources and adequate premises in the Cayman Islands for holding and managing equity participations in other entities. However, there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to more requirements under the ES Act. Uncertainties over the interpretation and implementation of the ES Act may have an adverse impact on our business and operations.

As an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements.

As a Cayman Islands company listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, we are subject to Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements. However, Nasdaq rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements. For example, the Companies Act does not require a majority of our directors to be independent and we could include non-independent directors as members of our compensation committee and nominating committee, and our independent directors would not necessarily hold regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present. Currently, we are evaluating as to whether we intend to rely on home country practice with respect to our corporate governance. If we choose to follow home country practice in the future, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

There can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year, which could subject U.S. investors in our Class A Ordinary Shares to significant adverse U.S. income tax consequences.

We will be a “passive foreign investment company,” or “PFIC,” if, in any particular taxable year, either (a) 75% or more of our gross income for such year consists of certain types of “passive” income or (b) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of our assets (as determined on the basis of fair market value) during such year produce or are held for the production of passive income (the “asset test”). Although the law in this regard is unclear, we intend to treat the VIE (including their subsidiaries) as being owned by us for U.S. federal income tax purposes, not only because we exercise effective control over the operation of such entity but also because we are entitled to substantially all of its economic benefits, and, as a result, we consolidate its results of operations in our consolidated financial statements. Assuming that we are the owner of the VIE (including their subsidiaries) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and based upon our current and expected income and assets, including goodwill, (taking into account the expected proceeds from this offering) and projections as to the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares following the offering, we do not presently expect to be a PFIC for the current taxable year or the foreseeable future.

While we do not expect to become a PFIC, the determination of whether we will be or become a PFIC will depend, in part, on the composition of our income and assets, which may be affected by how, and how quickly, we use our liquid assets and the cash raised in this offering. If we determine not to deploy significant amounts of cash for active purposes or if it were determined that we do not own the stock of the VIE for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our risk of being a PFIC may substantially increase. Because there are uncertainties in the application of the relevant rules and PFIC status is a factual determination made annually after the close of each taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for the current taxable year or any future taxable year.

If we are a PFIC in any taxable year, a U.S. holder (as defined in “Item 10.E. Additional Information—Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders”) may incur significantly increased U.S. income tax on gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of the Class A Ordinary Shares and on the receipt of distributions on the Class A Ordinary Shares to the extent such gain or distribution is treated as an “excess distribution” under the U.S. federal income tax rules and such holder may be subject to burdensome reporting requirements. Further, if we are a PFIC for any year during which a U.S. holder holds our Class A Ordinary Shares, we generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which such U.S. holder holds our Class A Ordinary Shares. For more information see “Item 10.E. Additional Information—Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders — Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”

We will incur increased costs and become subject to additional rules and regulations as a result of being a public company.

As a result of this offering, we will become a public company and expect to incur significant accounting, legal and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market, have detailed requirements concerning corporate governance practices of public companies, including Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act relating to internal controls over financial reporting. We expect these rules and regulations applicable to public companies to increase our accounting, legal and financial compliance costs and to make certain corporate activities more time-consuming and costly. Our management will be required to devote substantial time and attention to our public company reporting obligations and other compliance matters. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules and regulations, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs. Our reporting and other compliance obligations as a public company may place a strain on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future.

In the past, shareholders of a public company often brought securities class action suits against the company following periods of instability in the market price of that company’s securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations, which could harm our results of operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. History and Development of the Company

Baiya is a holding company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands on October 18, 2021. We have no substantial operations other than holding all of the issued and outstanding shares of Ruifeng International Group Limited, or Ruifeng BVI, which was established in the British Virgin Islands on October 25, 2021. Ruifeng BVI is also a holding company with substantially no operations other than holding all of the issue and outstanding shares of Juxing Investment Group (Hong Kong) Limited, or Juxing HK, which was established on November 3, 2021 under the laws of Hong Kong. Juxing HK is also a holding company with substantially no operations other than holding all of the issue and outstanding shares of Shenzhen Pengze Future Technology Co., Ltd, or Pengze WFOE, which was established on December 9, 2021 under the laws of PRC.

We conduct business operations through the VIE, Shenzhen Gongwuyuan Network Technology Co., Ltd., or Gongwuyuan, a PRC company, and its subsidiaries in China. Gongwuyuan was incorporated in China on October 23, 2017 and started to provide job matching services in 2017. The Gongwuyuan Platform was launched in November 2019 and has since expanded its flexible employment matching services in 5 provinces and 30 cities.

On March 21, 2025, the Company was officially listed on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “BIYA.” The Company announced the pricing of its initial public offering (IPO) of 2.5 million Class A Ordinary Shares at a price of $4.00 per share. Following the 1-for-25 reverse split effective December 29, 2025, this equates to 100,000 Class A Ordinary Shares on a post-split basis. All share and per-share amounts in this report have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse split. An aggregate of 51 shares were adjusted to address rounding differences arising from the 1-for-25 reverse split, with no impact on total shareholders’ equity. As a result of the share capital reorganization and reverse share split, the Company had 100,000,000 authorized preferred shares, par value $0.0025 per share, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.

On September 19, 2025, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with STARFISH TECHNOLOGY-FZE (“Starfish”) and each of the holders of Starfish’s outstanding capital shares, to acquire 100% of the equity interests in Starfish. The purchase price will be paid in the form of 2,320,000 newly-issued Class A ordinary shares of the Company. The transaction has not yet been completed.

Our principal executive offices are located at Yifang Capital Industrial Park, No. 33 Pingshan Industrial Road, Building A, 16F, Tangxia, Dongguan, Guangdong, China, and our telephone number is +86 0769-88785888. We maintain a website at www.gwyapp.com. Our website or any other website does not constitute a part of this annual report. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at the office of Harneys Fiduciary (Cayman) Limited, 4^th Floor, Harbour Place, 103 South Church Street, P.O. Box 10240, Grand Cayman KY1-1002, Cayman Islands. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Cogency Global, Inc. located at 122 East 42^nd Street, 18^th Floor, New York, NY 10168.

Developments in Fiscal 2025

2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

On May 30, 2025, we held our Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. At the meeting, our shareholders voted to approve (1) the proposal that, immediate effect, the authorized share capital of the Company be increased from US$50,000 divided into 400,000,000 ordinary shares of par value US$0.0001 each and 100,000,000 preferred shares of par value US$0.0001 each to US$180,000 divided into 1,700,000,000 ordinary shares of par value US$0.0001 each and 100,000,000 preferred shares of par value US$0.0001 each (the “Increase of Authorized Share Capital”), (2) the proposal that subject to approval by the shareholders of the “Increase of Authorized Share Capital” and immediately following the Increase of Authorized Share Capital, the authorized share capital of the Company be amended and reclassified as follows with immediate effect by undertaking the following steps: (a)1,600,000,000 of the authorized ordinary shares of par value US$0.0001 each (including all of the existing issued ordinary shares) in the Company will be re-designated and reclassified as 1,600,000,000 class A ordinary shares of par value US$0.0001 each (the “Class A Ordinary Shares”), where the rights of the existing ordinary shares shall be the same as the Class A Ordinary Shares; and (b)100,000,000 authorized but unissued ordinary shares of par value US$0.0001 each in the Company will be cancelled and a new class of shares comprising of 100,000,000 class B ordinary shares of par value US$0.0001 each (the “Class B Ordinary Shares”), which will be entitled to twenty (20) votes per share, will be created, such that the authorized share capital of the Company shall become US$180,000 divided into 1,600,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of par value US$0.0001 each, 100,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of par value US$0.0001 each and 100,000,000 preferred Shares of par value US$0.0001 each (the “Share Capital Reorganization”), and (3) the proposal that subject to approval by the shareholders of the Increase of Authorized Share Capital and the Share Capital Reorganization, with effect from the effective date of the Increase of Authorized Share Capital and the Share Capital Reorganization, the fourth amended and restated memorandum and articles of association of the Company in the form as attached to the shareholders meeting notice (the “Amended M&AA”) be approved and adopted as the new memorandum and articles of association of the Company in substitution for and to the exclusion of the existing amended and restated memorandum and articles of association of the Company to reflect.

2025 Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders

On November 28, 2025, we held our 2025 Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. At the meeting, the shareholders voted to approve (1) the proposal that with effect upon approval by the NASDAQ Stock Market, (a) all the authorized, issued and unissued Class A Ordinary Shares be consolidated at a 25:1 ratio (the Share Consolidation), such that every twenty-five (25) issued and unissued existing Class A ordinary shares of US$0.0001 par value each be consolidated into one Class A ordinary share of a par value of US$0.0025 each (the Consolidated Class A Ordinary Shares), such Consolidated Class A Ordinary Shares shall rank pari passu in all respect with each other, so that following the Share Consolidation, the authorized share capital of the Company shall become US$180,000 divided into (i) 64,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of par value US$0.0025 each, (ii) 100,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of par value US$0.0001 each and (iii) 100,000,000 Preferred Shares of par value US$0.0001 each; and (b) all fractional entitlements to the issued Consolidated Class A Ordinary Shares resulting from the Share Consolidation will not be issued to the shareholders of the Company and instead, any fractional shares that would have resulted from the Share Consolidation will be rounded up to the next whole number; and (2) the proposal that the Company adopt the fifth amended and restated memorandum and articles of association of the Company in its entirety and in substitution for, and to the exclusion of, the existing memorandum and articles of association of the Company with immediate effect, to reflect the revised authorized share capital upon effectiveness of the Share Consolidation.

Reverse Stock Split

On December 23, 2025, we announced our board of directors has approved a reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of our Class A ordinary shares, a par value of US$0.0001 each at a ratio of 1-for-25. Following the Reverse Stock Split, our Class A ordinary shares had a par value of $0.0025 per share.

We undertook the Reverse Stock Split with the objective of meeting the minimum $1.00 per Ordinary Share bid requirement for maintaining the listing of the Class A Ordinary Shares on The Nasdaq Capital Market.

The Reverse Stock Split was effective at 04:01 p.m. (ET) on Monday, December 29, 2025 (the “Record Date”) and the Class A Ordinary Shares began trading on a split-adjusted basis when the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC opens for trading on Tuesday, December 30, 2025. The Class A Ordinary Shares continued to trade on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the trading symbol “BIYA” but trade under the following new CUSIP number: G07064119.

Starfish Acquisition

On July 18, 2025, we announced our entry into a strategic merger framework agreement with Dubai-headquartered technology company STARFISH TECHNOLOGY-FZE (“Starfish”). Under this agreement, we intend to acquire all equity interests and core assets of Starfish, marking a significant shift in our business toward digital assets and financial technology. Target properties will include all intellectual property and operational rights to Starfish’s flagship product, UpTop.Meme (“UpTop”).

 On September 19, 2025, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Starfish and each of the holders of Starfish’s outstanding capital shares, to acquire 100% of the equity interests in Starfish. The purchase price will be paid in the form of 2,320,000 newly-issued Class A ordinary shares of the Company. The transaction has not yet been completed. Pursuant to this agreement, we will acquire 100% of Starfish and its flagship platform, UpTop.Meme, a decentralized liquidity protocol built on BNB Chain, designed to provide on-chain liquidity services for crypto-native digital assets, tokenized U.S. equities, and digital bonds, with the strategic goal of becoming the world’s leading decentralized liquidity infrastructure. This acquisition is part of our strategy to transition towards Web3 and digital assets. If we consummate digital asset-related acquisitions, we may become subject to evolving U.S. and PRC regulatory regimes governing digital assets, anti-money laundering, and sanctions compliance, which could materially affect operations and capital needs.

Change of Directors

Effective June 25, 2025, Mr. Dian Zhang resigned as the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the Company. The resignation of Mr. Zhang was not a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter related to the operations, policies, or practices of the Company.

Effective June 25, 2025, Ms. Xiaoyue Zhang resigned as a director of the Board of the Company. The resignation of Ms. Zhang was not a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter related to the operations, policies, or practices of the Company.

Effective June 25, 2025, Ms. Dan Bin, was elected as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) by the remaining members of the Board to fill the vacancy resulting from the resignation of Mr. Zhang.

Effective June 25, 2025, Ms. Linxi Xie, was elected as a director by the remaining members of the Board to fill the vacancy resulting from the resignation of Ms. Zhang.

Effective July 11, 2025, Mr. Weilai Zhang resigned as a director and the Chairman of the board of directorsof the Company. The resignation of Mr. Zhang was not a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter related to the operations, policies, or practices of the Company. Effective July 11, 2025, Ms. Siyu Yang (“Ms. Yang”) was elected as the Chairman of the Broad by the remaining members of the Board to fill the vacancy resulting from the resignation of Mr. Zhang.

Effective July 11, 2025, Ms. Luting Zhang was elected as a new director by the remaining members of the Board.

Effective July 21, 2025, Ms. Zicen Liao resigned as a director and the chair of the the Audit Committee of the Board. The resignation of Ms. Liao was not a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter related to the operations, policies, or practices of the Company.

Effective July 21, 2025, Ms. Yankun Wang, was elected as a director by the remaining members of the Board to fill the vacancy resulting from the resignation of Ms. Liao.

Recent Developments

Compliance with Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement

On January 14, 2026, we received a notification letter from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market, informing us that it has regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement set forth in Rule 5550(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules.

We had previously announced on August 11, 2025, that we were notified by Nasdaq on August 6, 2025 that we were not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), as the closing bid price of our ordinary shares had been below $1.00 per share for more than 30 consecutive business days. Pursuant to Rule 5810(c)(3)(A) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules, we had a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until February 2, 2026, to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid price requirement. On January 14, 2026, Nasdaq provided confirmation to us that for the last 10 consecutive business days, from December 30, 2025 to January 13, 2026, the closing bid price of our ordinary shares had been $1.00 per share or greater, that we have regained compliance with Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) and that the matter is now closed.

On January 14, 2026, we also received a letter from Nasdaq, informing us that it has regained compliance with requirement set forth in Rule 5550(b)(1) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules in lieu of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(2).

We had previously announced on August 11, 2025, that we were notified by Nasdaq on August 6, 2025 that we were not in compliance with the minimum MVLS requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(2), as our MVLS had been below $35 million for more than 30 consecutive business days. The letter also noted that we did not meet (i) the requirement for a minimum of $2.5 million in stockholders’ equity under Listing Rules 5550(b)(1) or (ii) the requirement for a minimum net income from continuing operations of $500,000 in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the three most recently completed fiscal years under Listing Rule 5550(b)(3). In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(C), we had 180 calendar days, or until February 2, 2026, to regain compliance pursuant to one of the three standards as set forth under Rule 5550(b)(1), Rule 5550(b)(2), or Rule 5550(b)(3). On January 14, 2026, Nasdaq provided confirmation to us that based on the Form 6-K, dated September 30, 2025, evidencing stockholders’ equity of $22,488,566, we have regained compliance with Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) and that the matter is now closed.

2026 Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders

On February 9, 2026, we held our 2026 Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. At the meeting, the shareholders voted to approve (1) the proposal that the Company’s authorized share capital be increased from US$180,000 divided into: (i) 64,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of par value US$0.0025 each, (ii) 100,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of par value US$0.0001 each and (iii) 100,000,000 Preferred Shares of par value US$0.0001 each, to US$12,680,000 divided into (i) 5,064,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of US$0.0025 par value each, (ii) 100,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of par value US$0.0001 each and (iii) 100,000,000 Preferred Shares of par value US$0.0001 each with immediate effect (the “Authorized Share Capital Increase”), (2) the proposal that conditional upon (i) the approval of the Authorized Share Capital Increase and (ii) the shareholders holding not less than two-thirds of the issued Class B Ordinary Shares of the Company consenting (the “Class B Shareholder’s Consent”) to the increase of the votes attached to each Class B Ordinary Share from twenty (20) votes per share to sixty (60) votes per share (the “Class B Condition to the Amended M&A”), the proposed Sixth Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company (the “Amended M&A”), in the form attached as Annex A to the notice of the Meeting, be adopted by the Company in substitution for, and to the exclusion of, the existing Fifth Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company; (3) the proposal that:(a) conditional upon the approval of the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”), (i) all the issued and outstanding and authorized and unissued class A ordinary shares of the Company (the “Class A Ordinary Shares”) in the authorized share capital of the Company be consolidated, at any one time or multiple times during a period of up to two years of the date of the Meeting, at the exact consolidation ratio and effective time as the Board may determine from time to time in its absolute discretion provided that the accumulative consolidation ratio for all such share consolidation(s) (altogether, the “Share Consolidations” and each, a “Share Consolidation”) shall not be more than 1:5,000; and (ii) no fractional Class A Ordinary Shares be issued in connection with each of the Share Consolidations; if a shareholder is entitled to receive a fractional Class A Ordinary Share upon a Share Consolidation, the total number of Class A Ordinary Shares to be received by such shareholder be rounded up to the next whole Class A Ordinary Share; (b) the Board be authorized, at its absolute and sole discretion, to either (i) implement one or more Share Consolidations, and determine the exact consolidation ratio and effective date of such Share Consolidation during a period of two years of the date of the Meeting; or (ii) elect not to implement any Share Consolidation during a period of two years of the date of the Meeting; and (c) if and when deemed advisable by the Board in its sole discretion, any director or officer of the company be authorized, for and on behalf of the company, to do all such other acts and things and execute all such documents necessary or desirable to implement Share Consolidation(s), (4) the proposal that subject to and immediately following the Share Consolidation(s) being effected, the Company adopt an amended and restated memorandum and articles of association in substitution for, and to the exclusion of, the Company’s then existing memorandum and articles of association, to reflect such Share Consolidation(s), (5) the proposal that a general mandate be granted to the Board to exercise absolute discretion, for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the date of the Meeting, in deciding on the disposal of any assets of the Company, whether by sale, transfer, or any other method of disposition, and to determine and finalize all specific terms, conditions, pricing, and arrangements related to any such asset disposal as the Board deems fit and (6) the proposal that the Board be authorized and empowered, in its absolute discretion, to arrange and secure financing for the purpose of purchasing virtual currencies and/or digital assets through any means it deems suitable, including but not limited to equity financing, debt financing, issuance of convertible securities, or entering into credit facilities (the “Financing”), and to negotiate, determine, agree upon, and execute all terms, conditions, agreements, and definitive documentation related to such Financing and the underlying asset purchases, including matters of size, pricing, security, tenor, and use of proceeds.

The Class B Condition to the Amended M&A was satisfied when the Class B Shareholder’s Consent was delivered to the Company’s registered office address on January 21, 2026 pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of the Company’s then effective memorandum and articles of association.

Entry into a Securities Purchase Agreement

On April 17, 2026, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an institutional investor for the purchase of 13,500,000 Class A Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0025 per share of the Company, at the price of $0.312 per share, by the investor. The closing of the transaction is expected to take place in the second quarter of 2026, subject to the satisfaction of the customary closing conditions, including necessary regulatory approvals, if applicable. This agreement is filed as Exhibit 4.26 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

B. Business Overview

We, Baiya International Group Inc., are an offshore holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. As a holding company with no material operations of our own, we conduct all of our operations in China through the Contractual Arrangements with Gongwuyuan which is a variable interest entity, and its subsidiaries, or collectively, “PRC operating entities”. Neither we nor our direct and indirect subsidiaries own any equity interests in the PRC operating entities.

Through Gongwuyuan, the VIE, we are building a human resource (“HR”) technology company utilizing our cloud-based internet platform to provide one-stop crowdsourcing recruitment and SaaS-enabled HR solutions in the flexible employment marketplace (the “Gongwuyuan Platform”). Our business currently focuses on three primary services: (i) job matching services; (ii) entrusted recruitment services; and (iii) project outsourcing services in the flexible employment market within China, primarily in the core manufacturing regions including the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta region.

Prior to 2022, we primarily conducted these services offline, while we utilized Gongwuyuan Platform for lead generation. Gongwuyuan may, from time to time, also recruit freelancers and workers to outsourcing and dispatch requests, which may include postings of available jobs for fulfillment through various third-party platforms that Gongwuyuan cooperates with. As of this report date, our services cover over 5 provinces and 30 cities.

The Gongwuyuan Platform was launched in November 2019 to expand its offline flexible employment matching services. We have been strategically building the Gongwuyuan Platform with innovative product features that work together to provide greater user experience and improve the job matching and HR related services in the flexible employment marketplace.

Gongwuyuan will continue to integrate digital technologies onto its platform, including crowdsourcing, big data and artificial intelligence, which we believe will enhance our capability to provide platform-based crowdsourcing recruitment and HR management services. The use of the crowdsourcing recruitment platform streamlines the process for efficient job matching and bulk recruitment of blue-collar workers for corporate businesses. In addition to its current focus on providing the four primary types of services in the flexible employment market, Gongwuyuan has further developed the Gongwuyuan Platform to include additional product features and services, such as human resource management, payroll and advances, electronic contracts and pay slips, and Yun Dan Bao, an optional feature that provides payment assurance for transactions through our Gongwuyuan Platform (“Yun Dan Bao”).

Through the Gongwuyuan Platform, we expect to provide effective solutions for employment matching of blue-collar workers with business enterprises and institutions, often as bulk transactions, through its innovative and intelligent crowdsourcing and HR management system. In addition, Gongwuyuan’s payment assurance service through Yun Dan Bao will be able to provide certain payment assurance for blue-collar workers, if Customers or Employing Companies opt in for this feature. Further, Gongwuyuan intends to provide a variety of other HR management and post-employment services through its Gongwuyuan Platform, including intelligent HR management, payroll and advances services, electronic contracts, electronic pay slips, direct deposit services and worker training programs. These integrated products and resources on a single platform will add business values to our customers by providing one-stop SaaS-enabled HR solutions in the flexible employment market, and to establish more standardized industry standards for blue-collar workers.

Current Business Models for Our Primary Services

The following is an overview of the business models for our four primary services:

Job Matching. For our job matching services, we act as an intermediary to connect Employing Companies with HR Service Companies to fulfill the labor needs of Employing Companies. The Employing Company will release employment and labor needs to Gongwuyuan, and Gongwuyuan will confirm such work information such as the number of workers, working hours and types of jobs with the services and resources that the HR Service Company are able to provide. The Employing Company has the discretion to select the HR Service Company to provide the requisite labor needs and Gongwuyuan acts as an agent in this service model. For our Job Matching services, Gongwuyuan receives a service fee from the Employing Company based on the total labor recruitment.

Entrusted Recruitment. Our entrusted recruitment service is currently one of the main revenue drivers for Gongwuyuan. Our entrusted recruitment service helps to maintain a stable business relationship among Gongwuyuan, the Employing Company and HR Service Company, while benefiting from high customer stickiness and a large blue-collar labor base with high recruitment frequency and turnover of approximately twice a year. Under this service model, the Employing Company directly submits their labor recruitment requirements to Gongwuyuan for their labor needs, which typically include the number of workers they need, work hours, the preferred/required skill sets, etc. (the “Overall Work Arrangement”). Once the Overall Work Arrangement is established, Gongwuyuan will confirm the information regarding the labor needs of the Employing Company and enter into an entrustment recruitment agreement with the Employing Company. Subsequently, Gongwuyuan will negotiate with the HR Service Company to organize the needed blue-collar workers, which includes providing employment information to the workers and registering basic personal information of the workers.

Unlike our job matching service model, the identities of the Employing Companies and the HR Service Companies are mutually confidential, and the Employing Companies are not able to select the HR Service Company and also do not have direct contact with the HR Service Companies; instead, Gongwuyuan has the discretion to select suitable HR Service Companies to fulfill the labor needs of the Employing Companies.

During the effective duration of the entrustment service, Gongwuyuan will maintain regular communication with Employing Company to collect feedback on the performance and suitability of the contracted blue-collar workers during the service period and to resolve any issues. For example, if any previously contracted workers resign or were terminated during the service period, Gongwuyuan will coordinate with HR Services Companies to provide the Employing Companies affected with new workers to fulfill their recruitment needs during such service period. Gongwuyuan receives a service fee from the Employing Companying for utilizing its entrusted recruitment service.

Project Outsourcing. Under our project outsourcing service model, Gongwuyuan fulfills the outsourced labor assignments of the Customers. We enter into various contracts with Customers for their labor assignments (project-based) and outsource these assignments to HR Service Companies. The primary focus of this service is to complete and address the particular workload needs of the Customer. The Customer submits its required workload to Gongwuyuan, which includes but is not limited to the number of assignments to be completed and the timeframe for completion of the assignments etc. Once the work arrangement is finalized, Gongwuyuan makes arrangements with HR Service Companies for the organization of the needed workers for the completion of these project-based assignments. Gongwuyuan receives a service fee from the Customer based on an accumulation of assignments completed for the month.

Services Through the Gongwuyuan Platform

We believe that the further development and adoption of our Gongwuyuan Platform will strengthen our business growth in our primary service areas.

The Gongwuyuan Platform includes features such as the Yun Dan Bao payment assurance, intelligent HR management system, electronic contracts management system, payroll and advance systems. The Gongwuyuan Platform is available as a mobile application, in both iOS and Android systems, with two versions: a) enterprise version, customized for institutional end-users, and b) individual version, customized for individual workers, available for download on certain major application stores, such as the Apple App Store (China), and android app store, integrated with leading applications, such as Tencent, WeChat, and Alipay. The Gongwuyuan Platform is also available as a web-based online platform through www.gwyapp.com.

Through its intelligent management transaction system and SaaS tools, the Gongwuyuan Platform connects HR and labor resource companies with business enterprises on a single platform, allowing an efficient matching of job-seeking blue-collar workers with the labor recruitment needs of businesses. The incorporation of Gongwuyuan’s innovative and intelligent management transaction system into the Gongwuyuan Platform enables Gongwuyuan to facilitate the cooperation among workers, enterprises and human resource and labor service companies. The Gongwuyuan Platform also integrates certain human resource management services for businesses and enterprises into the same platform, which allows businesses to easily review its employment situation conveniently on a single application. Further, departments within companies are able to access all human resources information across a single platform, which enables management conformity, improves manpower and efficacy, and increases efficiency of business resources. This promotes the standardization of the employment process for blue-collar workers in large businesses and enterprises, improving compliance with national and/or regional labor requirements, and help to create a more centralized and vertical human resource management structure.

There are two different versions of the Gongwuyuan Platform. The enterprise version of the Gongwuyuan Platform tailored for businesses and institutions consists of (i) SaaS-enabled HR management services, (ii) business partnerships and cooperation resources, and (iii) job postings and labor supply resources sharing services, which includes access to its payment assurance feature (“Yun Dan Bao”). The personal version is customized for blue-collar individual job seekers with job search feature.

While our products can be used as separate modules and features, they are also integrated into the Gongwuyuan Platform system and function interactively among all our products and services available on the Gongwuyuan Platform.

The following is a description of the integrated products and services available as individual modules on the Gongwuyuan Platform:

Market Opportunity and Growth Strategy

Gongwuyuan’s long-term objective is to expand its business coverage to include information technology services, online platforms to link schools and enterprises, and online training programs for workers. Gongwuyuan has begun to accumulate strategic resources and conduct market research in order to enhance its strategic position and future development in the field of blue-collar employments in the following areas:

Strategic Advantages

Gongwuyuan believes that it has the following strengths, which provide it with a competitive advantage and opportunity over its competitors:

Competition

Gongwuyuan primarily competes with other recruitment crowdsourcing and HR management service providers in China. Our primary competitors include traditional integrated service providers (e.g. ManpowerGroup, Renrui Human Resources, Career International, and FSG), platform-based companies (e.g. Dianmi Network Technology and Joyowo), other flexible employment crowdsourcing platforms and labor management service providers.

Seasonality

We experience fluctuations due to seasonal variations in demand for blue-collar workers and human resource related services. Fluctuations in the level of recruitment activity for blue-collar workers and human resource needs occur due to changes in the overall economic, market and social conditions in China. Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and may continue to fluctuate depending upon a number of factors, many of which are out of our control. For example, recruitment numbers tend to be higher during holidays and at the end of the year, and the demand for human resource services is reliant on the needs of employers as well as their perceptions of the job market. Such uncertainty makes it difficult for us to predict operating results on a period-to-period basis.

Sales and Marketing

We believe the success of our business and continued expansion of our services requires building mutually beneficial long-term business relationships with our strategic partners, on both regional and national levels. Towards that goal, we have developed marketing strategies through diverse marketing channels, including social media, industry conferences, online advertising platforms, etc.

We have cultivated and maintained cooperation and partnerships with a number of agencies, labor recruitment and outsourcing companies in the provinces we conduct our business in. We have a dedicated sales and marketing team which focuses on developing our relationship with these companies over China. Our cooperation with these companies have significantly improved our marketing efforts, through direct recommendations to vocational colleges, other human resource companies and potential employers which require large scale of blue-collar worker recruitment and human resources management services. In addition, our cooperative initiatives with the local and national government agencies provide us with effective channels to promote and demonstrate our Gongwuyuan Platform and our crowdsourcing recruitment and human resource services to local businesses.

We are actively seeking new and effective marketing channels in order to grow and promote our brand and our Gongwuyuan Platform. To facilitate our growth prospects, we are on track to form strategic partnerships with regional businesses nationwide to promote regional cooperation for our crowdsourcing recruitment and human resource services. We also actively participate in industry conferences and summits organized by industry associations and local government delegations to promote our Gongwuyuan Platform, its products and our services.

In addition to our marketing efforts described above, we also market our crowdsourcing recruitment services, HR management services and our Gongwuyuan Platform, through:

Research and Development

Our Gongwuyuan Platform is a cloud-based internet platform to provide one-stop crowdsourcing recruitment and SaaS-enabled HR solutions in the flexible employment marketplace. Gongwuyuan Platform provides employment matching of blue-collar workers through HR service companies with business enterprises and institutions through its innovative and intelligent management transaction system. In addition, it also provides other crowdsourcing products and services related to employment recruitment, including our Yun Dan Bao payment assurance system.

We plan to continue investing in and improving our Gongwuyuan Platform to further increase user friendliness, functionality and efficiency. In addition, we intend to provide further information technology services and additional platforms in the flexible employment market throughout China. We intend to develop and expand our products in digitalization and SaaS services for human resources. In addition to providing more advanced HR SaaS products and creating a private domain traffic matrix for our enterprise users, we also plan to provide more products in big data analysis for our enterprise users to optimize decision making for their human resources needs. Further, we will also continue development of our information technology services for our Gongwuyuan Platform, including proposed aftermarket services, supply chain and financial services, and to continue building our Gongwuyuan Platform into a comprehensive ecosystem for HR services and products.

Intellectual Property

As of the date of this annul report, we own one (1) registered layout-design of Integrated Circuit in the PRC, one (1) registered patent in the PRC, seven (7) registered trademarks in the PRC and thirty (30) registered software copyrights in the PRC, relating to various aspects of our operations. These registered intellectual properties are crucial to our business. We also own three (3) domain names registered in the PRC, including gwyapp.cn, gwyapp.com and gwyapp.net.

The success of our business depends substantially upon our continued ability to use our brand and trademarks to increase brand awareness and to further develop our brand. The unauthorized reproduction of our trademarks could diminish the value of our brand and our market acceptance, competitive advantages or goodwill. In addition, our proprietary information for our Gongwuyuan Platform and associated applications, in which we own 1 registered patent, is a component of our competitive advantage and our growth strategy. To accomplish this, we rely on our trade secrets, including know-how, confidentiality clauses in standard labor agreements and third party nondisclosure agreements, copyright laws, trademarks, intellectual property licenses and other contractual rights to establish and protect our proprietary rights in our technology.

Regulations

We are subject to a variety of PRC and foreign laws, rules and regulations across a number of aspects of our business. This section summarizes the principal PRC laws, rules and regulations relevant to our business and operations.

Regulation on Foreign Investment Restrictions

Investment activities in the PRC by foreign investors are principally governed by the Catalog of Industries for Encouraging Foreign Investment (2022 Edition), or the Catalog, as promulgated by the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (“MOFCOM”), and the National Development and Reform Commission (the “NDRC”) on December 27, 2020, and the Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (2024 Edition), or the Negative List (2024), as promulgated on September 6, 2024. According to the Negative List (2024), our value-added telecommunication services are restricted industry, while other businesses operated by us in PRC do not fall into the restricted or prohibited categories. The Negative List (2024) also stipulates that if a domestic enterprise engaged in business in the prohibited investment field issues shares abroad and is listed for trading, it shall be examined and approved by the relevant competent authorities of the state. According to a press release issued by the NDRC in relation to the same provisions in the Negative List (2021), the above provisions are only applicable to the direct overseas listing of domestic enterprises engaged in business in the prohibited investment field. However, provisions on overseas indirect listing of domestic companies are still being formulated and there are no detailed rules in connection with relevant requirements or procedures to obtain approval from relevant competent departments of the state. If relevant governmental authority determines or new future rules provides that we are required to obtain the approval and/or abide by the management requirement, we would have to apply for such approval and/or adjust our current management mechanism. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain such approval in time or at all.

In addition, a foreign-invested enterprise in the PRC is required to comply with other regulations on its incorporation, operation and changes. On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress (“NPC”) adopted the Foreign Investment Law (the “FIL”), which became effective on January 1, 2020. Pursuant to the FIL, PRC will grant national treatment to foreign-invested entities, except for those foreign-invested entities that operate in industries that fall within “restricted” or “prohibited” categories as prescribed in the Negative List (2025) to be released or approved by the State Council.

On December 31, 2019, the State Council promulgated the Implementation Rules to the Foreign Investment Law, which became effective on January 1, 2020. The implementation rules further clarify that the state encourages and promotes foreign investment, protects the lawful rights and interests of foreign investors, regulates foreign investment administration, continues to optimize a foreign investment environment, and advances a higher-levelopening. On December 30, 2019, the MOFCOM and SAMR jointly promulgated the Measures for Information Reporting on Foreign Investment, which became effective on January 1, 2020. Pursuant to the Measures for Information Reporting on Foreign Investment, where a foreign investor carries out investment activities in PRC, directly or indirectly, the foreign investor or the foreign-invested enterprise shall submit the investment information to the competent commerce department.

Regulations Relating to Information Security and Censorship

Internet content in China is regulated and restricted from a state security standpoint. The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (“the SCNPC”) enacted the Decisions on the Maintenance of Internet Security on December 28, 2000, which was most recently amended on August 27, 2009, providing that the following activities conducted through the internet are subject to criminal liabilities: (i) gaining improper entry into any of the computer information networks relating to state affairs, national defensive affairs, or cutting-edge science and technology; (ii) violation of relevant provisions of the State in the form of unauthorized interruption of any computer network or communication service, as a result of which the computer network or communication system cannot function normally; (iii) spreading rumor, slander or other harmful information via the internet for the purpose of inciting subversion of the state political power; (iv) stealing or divulging state secrets, intelligence or military secrets via internet; (v) marketing fake and substandard products or carrying out false publicity for any commodity or service; or (vi) infringing on intellectual property.

On November 7, 2016, the SCNPC promulgated the Cyber Security Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “Cyber Security Law”), which became effective on June 1, 2017, pursuant to which network operators shall comply with laws and regulations and fulfill their obligations to safeguard security of the network when conducting business and providing services. Those who provide services through networks including us shall take technical measures and other necessary measures pursuant to laws, regulations and compulsory national requirements to safeguard the safe and stable operation of the networks, respond to network security incidents effectively, prevent illegal and criminal activities, and maintain the integrity, confidentiality and usability of network data, and the network operator shall prevent network data from being divulged, stolen or falsified. In addition, any network operator that collects personal information shall follow the principles of legitimacy, rationality and necessity. Network operators shall neither gather personal information unrelated to the services they provide, nor gather or use personal information in violation of the provisions of laws and administrative regulations or the agreements arrived at. Network operators of key information infrastructure shall store within the territory of the PRC all the personal information and important data collected and produced within the territory of PRC.

On April 13, 2020, the CAC, the NDRC, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (the “MIIT”) and other nine promulgation authorities issued the Cybersecurity Review Measures (2020 Version), effective on June 1, 2020, which stipulate that the cybersecurity review shall focus on the evaluation of possible risks to national security caused by the purchase of the network product or service, also provide for more detailed rules regarding cybersecurity review requirements. On July 10, 2021, the CAC issued a revised draft of the Measures for Cybersecurity Review for public comments, which required that, in addition to the procurement of any network product or service by an operator of critical information infrastructure (the “CIIO”), any data processor carrying out data processing activities that affect or may affect national security should also be subject to cybersecurity review. On December 28, 2021, the Cybersecurity Review Measures (2021 Version) was promulgated and became effective on February 15, 2022 and the Cybersecurity Review Measures (2020 Version) was repealed at the same time. The Cybersecurity Review Measures (2021 Version) iterates that any online platform operators controlling personal information of more than 1 million users which seeks to list in a foreign stock exchange should also be subject to cybersecurity review. The Cybersecurity Review Measures (2021 Version) further elaborates the factors to be considered when assessing the national security risks of the relevant activities, including, among others, (i) the risk of core data, important data or a large amount of personal information being stolen, leaked, destroyed, and illegally used or exited the country; and (ii) the risk of critical information infrastructure, core data, important data or a large amount of personal information being affected, controlled, or maliciously used by foreign governments after listing abroad.

On June 10, 2021, the SCNPC promulgated the Data Security Law of the PRC (the “Data Security Law”), which took effect on September 1, 2021. The Data Security Law establishes a tiered system for data protection in terms of their importance, data categorized as “important data”, which will be determined by governmental authorities in the form of catalogs, shall be treated with higher level of protection. Specifically, the Data Security Law provides that processors of important data shall appoint a “data security officer” and a “management department” to take charge of data security. In addition, such processor shall evaluate the risk of its data activities periodically and file assessment reports with relevant regulatory authorities. Separately, data transaction intermediary services providers shall check the sources of the data, the identities of parties to the data transactions and shall keep records accordingly. Since the Data Security Law is relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation.

On July 7, 2022, the CAC promulgated the Measures for the Security Assessment of Outbound Data Transfers, or the Measures, which became effective from September 1, 2022. The Measures shall apply to the security assessment of the provision of important data and personal information collected and generated by data processors in the course of their operations within the territory of the People’s Republic of China by such data processors to overseas recipients. The Measures stipulates the circumstances under which security assessment of outbound data transfers should be declared, including: (i) outbound transfer of important data by a data processor; (ii) outbound transfer of personal information by a critical information infrastructure operator or a personal information processor who has processed the personal information of more than 1,000,000 people; (iii) outbound transfer of personal information by a personal information processor who has made outbound transfers of the personal information of 100,000 people cumulatively or the sensitive personal information of 10,000 people cumulatively since 1 January of the previous year; or (iv) other circumstances where an application for the security assessment of an outbound data transfer is required as prescribed by the national cyberspace administration authority. Based on the relevant regulations relating to outbound data transfer in the Cybersecurity Law, the Data Security Law, and the Personal Information Protection Law, the measures provides the scope, conditions and procedures of security assessment of outbound data transfer and thereby provides specific guidelines for security assessment of outbound data transfers.

On February 22, 2023, the CAC issued the Provisions on the Standard Contract for Outbound Cross-border Transfer of Personal Information, or the Provisions, which became effective on June 1, 2023. The CAC further promulgated on Provisions of Promoting and Regulating Cross-border Data Flow, effective on March 22, 2024, it is stipulated that if the content of the Provisions of Promoting and Regulating Cross-border Data Flow is inconsistent with the content of the Measures for the Security Assessment of Outbound Data Transfers and the Provisions on the Standard Contract for Outbound Cross-border Transfer of Personal Information, the Provisions of Promoting and Regulating Cross-border Data Flow shall prevail. According to the Personal Information Protection Law, the A personal information processor who intends to enter into a contract to provide personal information to an overseas recipient outside the territory of the PRC shall enter into a standard contract for outbound cross-border transfer of personal information. The Provisions provides the detailed requirements and guidelines for such standard contract.

On September 24, 2024, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on the Network Data Security Management (the “Data Security Management Regulations”), which became effective on January 1, 2025. Pursuant to the Data Security Management Regulations, network data processing activities refer to activities such as the collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, provision, disclosure, and deletion of data. Network data processors refer to individuals or organizations that independently determine the purposes and methods of data processing activities. Network data processors conducting any data processing activities that affect or may affect national security shall undergo national security review in accordance with relevant national regulations. Where it is indeed necessary to transfer any important data collected and generated within the territory of the PRC to an overseas party, the security assessment of outbound data transfer organized by the national cyberspace administration department shall be passed.

The Cybersecurity Review Measures (2021 Version) the Measures were adopted and the Data Security Management Regulations became effective on January 1, 2025, and their implementation provisions and anticipated adoption or effective date remains substantially uncertain and may be subject to change. If the CAC or other regulatory agencies promulgate new rules or explanations requiring that we obtain their approvals for this report and any subsequent report, we may become subject to enhanced cybersecurity review. Certain internet platforms in China have been reportedly subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny in relation to cybersecurity matters.

On October 28, 2025, the Standing Committee of the NPC adopted amendments to the Cybersecurity Law, which took effect on January 1, 2026. The revisions align the legal liability for personal information processing with the PIPL and other applicable laws, ensuring that breaches of personal data are subject to a cohesive legal framework. Furthermore, the amendments introduce a tiered penalty system: for violations with particularly serious consequences, companies may face fines of up to RMB10 million, and responsible individuals may face fines of up to RMB1 million. The amendments also expand the extraterritorial application of the Cybersecurity Law to cover overseas activities that endanger China’s cybersecurity. These developments indicate a continued regulatory focus on data protection and could impact our compliance costs and operational procedures, particularly concerning customer data handling and the potential designation of core business systems as critical information infrastructure. On September 11, 2025, the Cyberspace Administration of China promulgated the Measures for the Administration of National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting, which took effect on November 1, 2025. These measures require that network operators engaged in network construction, operation, or network-based service provision within the territory of the People’s Republic of China shall report cybersecurity incidents in accordance with the provisions thereof once such incidents occur. In particular, for cybersecurity incidents at or above the “relatively significant level”, network operators shall promptly report to the local provincial-level cyberspace administration department, and in any event, such reporting shall not be delayed for more than four hours.

As of the date of this report, we have not been informed by any PRC governmental authority of any requirement that we file for a cybersecurity review. However, if we are deemed to be a CIIO or a company that is engaged in data processing and holds personal information of more than 1 million users, we could be subject to PRC cybersecurity review.

Regulations Relating to Privacy Protection

Pursuant to the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (the “Civil Code”), the personal information of a natural person shall be protected by the law. Any organization or individual that need to obtain personal information of others shall obtain such information legally and ensure the safety of such information, and shall not illegally collect, use, process or transmit personal information of others, or illegally purchase or sell, provide or make public personal information of others.

On December 13, 2005, the Ministry of Public Security issued the Regulations on Technological Measures for Internet Security Protection, or the Internet Protection Measures, which took effect on March 1, 2006. The Internet Protection Measures require Internet service providers to take proper measures including anti-virus, data back-upand other related measures, and to keep records of certain information about their users (including user registration information, log-in and log-out time, IP address and log files of system maintenance) for at least 60 days, and detect illegal information, stop transmission of such information, and keep relevant records. Internet services providers are prohibited from unauthorized disclosure of users’ information to any third parties unless such disclosure is required by the laws and regulations. They are further required to establish management systems and take technological measures to safeguard the freedom and secrecy of the users’ correspondences.

On December 28, 2012, the SCNPC promulgated the Decision on Strengthening Network Information Protection to enhance the legal protection of information security and privacy on the internet. On July 16, 2013, the MIIT promulgated the Provisions on Protection of Personal Information of Telecommunication and Internet Users to regulate the collection and use of users’ personal information in the provision of telecommunication services and Internet information services in China and the personal information includes a user’s name, birth date, identification card number, address, phone number, account name, password and other information that can be used for identifying a user. Telecommunication business operators and Internet service providers are required to constitute their own rules for the collecting and use of users’ information and they cannot collect or use of user’s information without users’ consent. Telecommunication business operators and Internet service providers must specify the purposes, manners and scopes of information collection and uses, obtain consent of the relevant citizens, and keep the collected personal information confidential. Telecommunication business operators and Internet service providers are prohibited from disclosing, tampering with, damaging, selling or illegally providing others with, collected personal information. Telecommunication business operators and Internet service providers are required to take technical and other measures to prevent the collected personal information from any unauthorized disclosure, damage or loss.

On December 29, 2011, the MIIT promulgated the Several Provisions on Regulation of the Order of Internet Information Service Market, which became effective on March 15, 2012. The Provisions stipulate that without the consent of users, Internet information service providers shall not collect information relevant to the users that can lead to the recognition of the identity of the users independently or in combination with other information (hereinafter referred to as “personal information of users”), nor shall they provide personal information of users to others, unless otherwise provided by laws and administrative regulations. The Provisions also requires that Internet information service providers shall properly keep the personal information of users; if the preserved personal information of users is divulged or may possibly be divulged, Internet information service providers shall immediately take remedial measures; where such incident causes or may cause serious consequences, they shall immediately report the same to the telecommunications administration authorities that grant them with the Internet information service license or filing and cooperate in the investigation and disposal carried out by relevant departments. Failure to comply with such requirements may result in a fine between RMB10,000 and RMB30,000 and an announcement to the public.

On May 8, 2017, the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate released the Interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases Involving Infringement of Citizens’ Personal Information, or the Interpretations, effective from June 1, 2017. The Interpretations clarify several concepts regarding the crime of “infringement of citizens’ personal information” stipulated by Article 253A of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, including “citizen’s personal information”, “provision”, and “unlawful acquisition”. Also, the Interpretations specify the standards for determining “serious circumstances” and “particularly serious circumstances” of this crime.

On August 20, 2021, the SCNPC promulgated Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China (“The Personal Information Protection Law”), which became effective on November 1, 2021. According to The Personal Information Protection Law, personal information refers to any kind of information related to an identified or identifiable natural person as electronically or otherwise recorded, excluding information that has been anonymized. Processing of personal information includes the collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, provision, disclosure, and deletion of personal information. Processing of personal information shall be for a specified and reasonable purpose, and shall be conducted for a purpose directly relevant to the purpose of processing and in a way that has the least impact on personal rights and interests. Collection of personal information shall be limited to the minimum scope necessary for achieving the purpose of processing and shall not be excessive.

There remain uncertainties with respect to the interpretation and detailed application of such laws and regulations and PRC regulators are enhancing the protection of privacy rule-making and enforcement actions at central and local levels. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with privacy policies or related legal obligations could cause suspension of business for rectification, fines and other penalties. See also “Item 3.D. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry — The PRC operating entities rely heavily on their information systems, and any failure to properly protect privacy and to maintain and secure the PRC operating entities’ systems could seriously damage the PRC operating entities’ reputation, disrupt the PRC operating entities’ operations and harm their business.”

Licenses for Value-Added Telecommunications Services

An extensive regulatory scheme governing telecommunication services, including value-added telecommunication services and infrastructure telecommunications services, is promulgated by the State Council, MIIT, and other relevant government authorities. Value-added telecommunication service operators may be required to obtain additional licenses and permits in addition to those that they currently have given new laws and regulations may be adopted from time to time. In addition, uncertainties exist regarding the interpretation and implementation of PRC laws and regulations applicable to the telecommunication activities.

On September 25, 2000, the State Council issued the Regulations on Telecommunications of China, or the Telecommunications Regulations, which was lately amended on February 6, 2016, to regulate telecommunications activities in China. The Telecommunications Regulations divide the telecommunications services into two categories, namely “infrastructure telecommunications services” and “value-added telecommunications services.” Pursuant to the Telecommunications Regulations, operators of value-added telecommunications services must first obtain a Value-added Telecommunications Business Operating License, or VAT License, from the MIIT, or its provincial level counterparts. The MIIT promulgated the Administrative Measures on Telecommunications Business Operating Licenses on March 1, 2009 and most recently amended it on July 3, 2017, for the purpose of setting forth more specific provisions regarding the types of licenses required to operate value-added telecommunications services, the qualifications and procedures for obtaining such licenses and the administration and supervision of such licenses.

According to the Catalog of Classification of Telecommunications Businesses effective from April 1, 2003, internet information services, also called internet content services, or ICP services, are deemed as a type of value-added telecommunications services. On December 28, 2015 and June 6, 2019, the MIIT published revised editions of Catalog of Classification of Telecommunication Business. According to the latest 2019 MIIT Catalog, internet information services, which include information release and delivery services, information search and query services, information community platform services, information real-times interactive services, and information protection and processing services, continues to be classified as a category of value-added telecommunication services. The Administrative Measures on Internet Information Services, or ICP Measures, also promulgated by the PRC State Council on September 25, 2000 and amended on January 8, 2011, set forth more specific rules on the provision of ICP services. According to ICP Measures, any company that engages in the provision of commercial ICP services shall obtain a sub-category VAT License for Internet Information Services, or ICP license, from the relevant government authorities before providing any commercial internet content services within the PRC, and when the ICP services involve areas of news, publication, education, medical treatment, health, pharmaceuticals and medical equipment, and if required by law or relevant regulations, specific approval from the respective regulatory authorities must be obtained prior to applying for the ICP License from the MIIT or its provincial level counterpart.

Foreign Investment in Value-Added Telecommunication Services

The Regulations on Administration of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises, or the FITE Regulations, which took effect on January 1, 2002 and lastly amended on May 1, 2022, are the key regulations that regulate foreign direct investment in telecommunications companies in China. The FITE Regulations stipulate that the foreign investor of a telecommunications enterprise is prohibited from holding more than 50% of the equity interest in a foreign-invested enterprise that provides value-added telecommunications services, unless otherwise stipulated by the State In addition, for a foreign investor to acquire any equity interest in a business providing value-added telecommunications services in China, the latest FITE Regulations no longer requires that such foreign investor must demonstrate a positive track record and experience in providing such services. Pursuant to the FITE Regulations, the registered capital of a foreign-invested telecom enterprise that operate value-added telecommunications services shall comply with the following requirements: (i) for operating business nationwide or across provinces, autonomous regions, or municipalities directly under the central government, the minimum registered capital shall be CNY10 million; and (ii) for operating business within a province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the central government, the minimum registered capital shall be CNY1 million. To operate telecommunications business, a foreign-invested telecom enterprise shall, in addition to meeting the requirements specified in the FITE Regulation, also meet the requirements specified in the Telecommunications Regulations, which was promulgated on February 6, 2016, for operating the business of value-added telecommunications services, including: (i) the operator shall be a legally established company; (ii) there are funds and specialized personnel commensurate with the business activities to be developed; (iii) the operator has the reputation or the capability to provide long term service to its subscribers; and (iv) other conditions specified by the State.

On July 13, 2006, the MIIT issued the Circular on Strengthening the Administration of Foreign Investment in Value-added Telecommunications Services, or the MIIT Circular 2006, which requires that (i) foreign investors can only operate a telecommunications business in China through establishing a telecommunications enterprise with a valid telecommunications business operation license; (ii) domestic license holders are prohibited from leasing, transferring or selling telecommunications business operation licenses to foreign investors in any form, or providing any resource, sites or facilities to foreign investors to facilitate the unlicensed operation of telecommunications business in China; (iii) value-added telecommunications services providers or their shareholders must directly own the domain names and registered trademarks they use in their daily operations; (iv) each value-added telecommunications services provider must have the necessary facilities for its approved business operations and maintain such facilities in the geographic regions covered by its license; and (v) all value-added telecommunications services providers should improve network and information security, enact relevant information safety administration regulations and set up emergency plans to ensure network and information safety. Due to the lack of any additional interpretation from the regulatory authorities, it remains unclear what impact MIIT Circular 2006 will have on us or the other PRC internet companies with similar corporate and contractual structures. MIIT issued the Circular on Removing the Restrictions on Shareholding Ratio Held by Foreign Investors in Online Data Processing and Transaction Processing (Operating E-commerce) Business on June 19, 2015, which began to allow foreign investors to own more than 50% of the equity interest in an operator of e-commerce business. However, foreign investors continue to be prohibited from holding more than 50% of the equity interest in a provider of other category of value-added telecommunication’s services except for e-commerce.

To comply with the above-mentioned foreign ownership restrictions, we operate our value-added telecommunication services in China through the VIE.

Regulations relating to Mobile Internet Applications Information Services

Mobile internet applications (the “APPs”) and the APP distribution platforms are subject to the Administrative Provisions on Mobile Internet Applications Information Services (the “APP Provisions”), which was promulgated by the CAC on June 14, 2022 and became effective from August 1, 2022. The APP Provisions regulate the APP providers and the APP distribution platforms. The CAC and local offices of cyberspace administration shall be responsible for the supervision and administration of nationwide or local APP information services, respectively.

Under the APP Provisions, the APP providers shall acquire relevant qualifications, implement the information security management responsibilities strictly and fulfil their obligations, including real-name system, protection of users’ information, examination and management of information content, etc. In addition, the APP providers shall enter into the service agreements with the APP users, clarifying the rights and obligations of both parties. The APP distribution platforms shall file a record with the related local offices of cyberspace administration within 30 days after such services have been rolled out online for operation. They shall fulfil the administrative responsibilities over the APP providers. For any App providers who violates the aforementioned provisions, the APP distribution platforms shall take such measures as warning, suspending the release or withdrawing the applications as the case may be, keep records and report such violation to the relevant competent authorities. In addition, the APP distribution platforms shall also enter into the service agreements with the APP providers, clarifying the rights and obligations of both parties.

Regulations relating to HR Services

HR services providers in China are mainly regulated by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (the “MOHRSS”). The principal regulations applicable to HR services providers include (i) the Provisions on Employment Services and Employment Management promulgated on November 5, 2007 and latest amended on January 7, 2022 by the MOHRSS, (ii) the Provisions on Talent Market Administration jointly promulgated by the PRC Ministry of Personnel, the PRC State Administration for Industry and Commerce on September 11, 2001 and latest amended on December 31, 2019 by the MOHRSS and (iii) the Interim Regulation on Human Resources Market promulgated by the PRC State Council on June 29, 2018.

Under the Provisions on Employment Services and Employment Management, the Provisions on Talent Market Administration, the Notice on Further Strengthening Work Related to Human Resources Market Supervision, promulgated by the MOHRSS on January 29, 2010 and the Interim Regulation on Human Resources Market, any entity engaging in occupational intermediary activities in China must obtain a HR Services License from the administrative department of human resources and social security. Besides, the profit-making HR service organization shall file with the administrative department of human resources and social security 15 days from the date of carrying out services such as the collection and release of HR supply and demand information, employment and entrepreneurship guidance, human resource management consulting, human resource assessment, HR training, and HR service outsourcing. Where a profit-making HR service organization establishes a branch, it shall, within 15 days from the date of completion of the industrial and commercial registration, report in writing to the administrative department of human resources and social security where the branch office locates.