UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of August 2022
Commission File Number: 001-40324
Centerra Gold
Inc.
(Translation of registrant's name into English)
1 University Avenue, Suite 1500
Toronto, Ontario
M5J 2P1
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F ¨ Form 40-F x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ¨
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ¨
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the registrant's "home country"), or under the rules of the home country exchange on which the registrant's securities are traded, as long as the report or other document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been distributed to the registrant's security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR.
On August 26, 2022, the Registrant issued a management information circular, a notice of meeting, a form of proxy, a certificate of abridgement and an annual report, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, Exhibit 99.2, Exhibit 99.3, Exhibit 99.4 and Exhibit 99.5, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit 99.1. Management Information Circular
Exhibit 99.2. Notice of Meeting
Exhibit 99.4. Certificate of Abridgement Pursuant to NI 54-101
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Centerra Gold Inc. | ||
| (Registrant) | ||
| Date: August 26, 2022 | /s/ Scott Perry | |
| Scott Perry | ||
| President and CEO | ||
Exhibit 99.1

Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
and
Management Information Circular
August 19, 2022

Dear fellow Shareholder,
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Centerra Gold Inc. (“Centerra”), it is my pleasure to invite you to attend our annual general meeting of shareholders to be held on September 22, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) (the “Meeting”) to address the items of business described in the notice of meeting and management information circular accompanying this letter.
In keeping with our commitment to the health and safety of our shareholders, employees and the broader community in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to permit a greater number of shareholders to attend the Meeting, we will again be holding our Meeting in a virtually only format to be conducted via a live audio webcast online at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739. By accessing the live audio webcast online, Centerra shareholders will have an equal opportunity to attend, participate and vote at the Meeting.
In the accompanying management information circular, you will find important information and instructions on how to attend and vote your Centerra common shares at the Meeting, either online or by proxy. Please exercise your rights as a shareholder either by attending and voting at the Meeting online, or by completing and returning your form of proxy or voting instruction form in advance of the Meeting. If you have any questions or require more information with regard to voting your Centerra shares at the Meeting, please contact Morrow Sodali, Centerra’s proxy solicitation agent, by telephone toll free in North America at 1-888-999-2944 or collect outside of North America at 1-289-695-3075 or by email at assistance@morrowsodali.com.
I thank you for your continuing interest in Centerra.
| Sincerely, | |
| (signed) “Michael S. Parrett” | |
| Michael S. Parrett | |
| Chair of the Board of Directors | |
| Toronto, Ontario | |
| August 19, 2022 |

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholder:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the annual general meeting of the shareholders (the “Meeting”) of Centerra Gold Inc. (“Centerra”) will be held on September 22, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) in order for shareholders of Centerra to:
| 1. | receive the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the auditors’ report thereon; |
| 2. | elect directors of Centerra for the ensuing year; |
| 3. | re-appoint auditors for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix the remuneration to be paid to the auditors; |
| 4. | consider, and if deemed advisable, approve, a non-binding advisory resolution to accept Centerra’s approach to executive compensation; and |
| 5. | transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof. |
Similar to last year, and in light of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic and to permit a greater number of shareholders to attend the Meeting, Centerra will hold the Meeting in a virtual only format, which will be conducted via live audio webcast at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739. At this website, shareholders will have an equal opportunity to attend, participate and vote their shares at the Meeting, regardless of geographic location. Shareholders will not be able to physically attend the Meeting.
Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders will be able to attend, participate and vote at the Meeting online. Non-registered shareholders (being shareholders who beneficially own shares that are registered in the name of an intermediary such as a bank, trust company, securities broker or other nominee, or in the name of a depository of which the intermediary is a participant) who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholder will be able to attend the Meeting online as guests, but guests will not be able to vote or ask questions at the Meeting.
A Centerra shareholder who wishes to appoint a person other than the Centerra proxyholders identified on the form of proxy or voting instruction form accompanying this notice (including a non-registered shareholder who wishes to appoint themselves as proxyholder in order to attend and vote at the Meeting online) must carefully follow the instructions in the management information circular and on their form of proxy or voting instruction form accompanying this notice. These instructions include the additional step of registering such proxyholder with our transfer agent, TSX Trust Company (“TSX Trust”), after submitting a form of proxy or voting instruction form. Failure to register will result in the proxyholder not receiving a Control Number, which is used as their online sign-in credentials and is required for them to vote at the Meeting. Without a Control Number, such proxyholder will only be able to attend the Meeting online as a guest. Non-registered shareholders located in the United States must also provide TSX Trust with a duly completed legal proxy if they wish to vote at the Meeting or appoint a third party as their proxyholder.
The Board of Directors of Centerra has fixed the close of business on August 19, 2022 as the record date to determine which shareholders are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
| BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | |
| (signed) “Yousef Rehman” | |
| Yousef Rehman | |
| Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | |
| Toronto, Ontario, Canada | |
| August 19, 2022 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| SOLICITATION OF PROXIES AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS | 1 |
| VOTING INFORMATION | 1 |
| Voting by Proxy | 2 |
| Attending and Voting at the Virtual Meeting | 3 |
| VOTING COMMON SHARES | 5 |
| PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES | 5 |
| BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED AT THE MEETING | 5 |
| Financial Statements | 5 |
| Election of Directors | 5 |
| Appointment of Auditors | 12 |
| Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation | 12 |
| REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 14 |
| Letter from the Human Resources and Compensation Committee | 14 |
| Compensation Governance | 17 |
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 19 |
| Executive Share Ownership | 28 |
| Succession Planning for Senior Management | 29 |
| Share Performance and Cost of Compensation | 30 |
| Compensation Paid to Named Executive Officers in 2021 | 31 |
| Termination and Change of Control Benefits | 34 |
| Equity Compensation Plan Information | 36 |
| Director Compensation | 37 |
| Directors’ Share Ownership | 39 |
| Directors Share-Based Awards, Option-Based Awards and Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | 40 |
| Directors Incentive Plan Awards (Value Earned During 2021) | 41 |
| REPORT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 42 |
| Board Mandate | 42 |
| Independence of Board Members | 44 |
| Interlocking Directorships | 44 |
| Majority Voting and Advance Notice Nominations | 44 |
| Skills Matrix | 45 |
| Overseeing and Managing Risk | 45 |
| Committees of the Board of Directors | 46 |
| Diversity of the Company’s Directors and Officers | 48 |
| Board Renewal | 49 |
| Assessment Process | 49 |
| Nomination of New Directors and Board Size | 50 |
| Board Education Opportunities | 50 |
i
| Compensation of Directors | 51 |
| Codes of Ethics | 51 |
| Disclosure and Insider Trading Policy | 52 |
| Shareholder/Investor Communications and Feedback | 52 |
| DIRECTORS’ AND OFFICERS’ LIABILITY INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION | 52 |
| INTERESTS OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON | 53 |
| INTERESTS OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS | 53 |
| SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING | 53 |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | 53 |
| DIRECTORS’ APPROVAL | 53 |
| APPENDIX A | A-1 |
ii

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR
August 19, 2022
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
The information contained in this management information circular (the “Circular”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies from holders of common shares (“Shares”) in the capital of Centerra Gold Inc. (“Centerra” or the “Company”). These proxies will be used at the annual general meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held on September 22, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) or any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Meeting”), for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice of meeting. The Meeting will be held in a virtual only format, which will be conducted via live audio webcast at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739. Shareholders will not be able to physically attend the Meeting. For a summary of how shareholders may attend the Meeting online, see “Attending and Voting at the Virtual Meeting” below.
The solicitation of proxies by this Circular is being made by or on behalf of the management of the Company. It is expected that the solicitation will be made primarily by mail, but proxies and voting instructions may also be solicited personally or by telephone by employees of the Company. The Company has also retained the services of Morrow Sodali to act as the Company’s proxy solicitation agent. In connection with these services, among others, Morrow Sodali will receive a fee of $25,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. Additionally, the Company may use the Broadridge QuickVote™ service, which involves “non-objecting” non-registered owners of Shares being contacted by Morrow Sodali to obtain voting instructions over the telephone and relaying them to Broadridge Investor Services (on behalf of the shareholder’s intermediary). While representatives of Morrow Sodali are soliciting proxies on behalf of Centerra management, which is recommending that shareholders vote FOR all of the matters to be voted on at the Meeting, shareholders are not required to vote in the manner recommended by management. The QuickVote™ system is intended to assist shareholders in placing their votes, however, there is no obligation for any shareholders to vote using the QuickVote™ system, and shareholders may vote (or change or revoke their votes) at any other time and in any other applicable manner described in this Circular. Any voting instructions provided by a shareholder will be recorded and such shareholder will receive a letter from Broadridge (on behalf of the shareholder’s intermediary) as confirmation that their voting instructions have been accepted. The total cost of the solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company.
The information contained in this Circular is given as at August 19, 2022 and all dollar amounts are in Canadian dollars, except where otherwise noted.
VOTING INFORMATION
You are entitled to vote at the Meeting if you were a holder of Shares of Centerra at the close of business on August 19, 2022, the record date for the Meeting. Each Share is entitled to one (1) vote. How you vote depends on whether you are a registered shareholder or a non-registered shareholder.
Registered Shareholders
You are a registered shareholder if your Shares are registered in your own name. As a registered shareholder, you may attend, participate and vote at the virtual only Meeting via live audio webcast online at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739. See “Attending and Voting at the Virtual Meeting” below.
If you are a registered shareholder and will not attend the Meeting, or if your Shares are registered in the name of a company that you own, your Shares may still be counted by authorizing an individual, called a proxyholder, to attend the Meeting and vote your Shares. Any legal form of proxy may be used, and a form of proxy will be mailed by the Company together with this Circular.
1
Non-Registered Shareholders
You are a non-registered shareholder if you beneficially own Shares that are registered in the name of an intermediary such as a bank, trust company, securities broker or other nominee, or in the name of a depository of which the intermediary is a participant, and therefore do not have Shares registered in your own name.
In accordance with applicable securities laws, Centerra has distributed copies of the notice of meeting, this Circular and form of proxy or voting instruction form, as applicable (collectively, the “Meeting Materials”) to intermediaries for onward distribution to non-registered shareholders who have not waived their right to receive them. The Company does not send proxy-related materials directly to non-registered shareholders and is not relying on the notice-and access provisions of securities laws for delivery of the Meeting Materials to either registered or non-registered shareholders. Typically, intermediaries will use a service company (such as Broadridge Investor Communications) to forward the Meeting Materials to non-registered shareholders. The Company has elected to pay for the delivery of the Meeting Materials to non-registered shareholders, including “objecting beneficial owners”, at the Company’s cost. Meeting Materials will include either your intermediary’s voting instruction form or a form of proxy stamped by the intermediary limited to the number of Shares beneficially owned by you, but that is otherwise not complete. The purpose of these documents is to permit you to direct the voting of the Shares you beneficially own. You should carefully follow the instructions set out in your intermediary’s voting instruction form or form of proxy, as the case may be.
See “Attending and Voting at the Virtual Meeting” below.
Voting by Proxy
Appointment of Proxies
The individuals named in the voting instruction form or the form of proxy you received are representatives of management of the Company. You have the right to appoint another person (who need not be a shareholder) to represent you at the Meeting. You may appoint another person by inserting that person’s name in the blank space set out in the form of proxy provided or by completing another proper form of proxy. See “Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy” below.
By properly completing and returning a voting instruction form or form of proxy, you are authorizing the individual named in the form to attend the Meeting virtually and to vote your Shares. To be valid, proxies must be deposited with our transfer agent, TSX Trust Company (“TSX Trust”) by mail to: Attn Proxy Dept., P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario, Canada, M1S 0A1; by telephone (toll free) to: 1-888-489-5760; by fax to: (416) 368-2502 or toll-free within North America 1-866-781-3111; or by e-mail to: proxyvote@tmx.com, or vote online at www.tsxtrust.com/vote-proxy, in each case no later than 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on September 20, 2022 or if the Meeting is postponed or adjourned, on a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a statutory holiday in the Province of Ontario which is at least 48 hours before the time of such reconvened or convened meeting, as applicable. Late proxies may be accepted or rejected by the Chair of the Meeting in his sole discretion; the Chair of the Meeting is under no obligation to accept or reject a late proxy. The Chair of the Meeting may extend or waive the proxy cut-off time in his sole discretion and without notice.
Exercise of Discretion by Proxies
The Shares represented by your voting instruction form or form of proxy must be voted or withheld from voting in accordance with your instruction on the form and if you specify a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, your Shares will be voted accordingly. If you have not specified how to vote on a particular matter, if any amendments are proposed to any matter, or if other matters are properly brought before the Meeting, then, in each case, your proxyholder can vote your Shares as your proxyholder sees fit.
If you properly complete and return your voting instruction form or form of proxy appointing representatives of management of the Company as your proxy, but do not specify how you wish the votes to be cast, your Shares will be voted: (i) FOR the election of directors nominated by management; (ii) FOR the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent auditor for 2022 and the authorization of the directors to fix their remuneration; (iii) FOR the non-binding advisory resolution to accept Centerra’s approach to executive compensation, and (iv) at the discretion of management, on any matter which may properly come before the Meeting.
Revocation
If you are a registered shareholder and have provided a proxy, you may revoke your proxy by: (i) completing and signing another form of proxy bearing a later date and depositing it with TSX Trust: by mail to: Attn: Proxy Dept., P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario, Canada, M1S 0A1; by telephone (toll free) to: 1-888-489-5760; by fax to: (416) 368-2502 or toll-free within North America 1-866-781-3111; or by e-mail to: proxyvote@tmx.com, or vote online at www.tsxtrust.com/vote-proxy, in each case no later than 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on September 20, 2022 or, if the Meeting is postponed or adjourned, on a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a statutory holiday in the Province of Ontario which is at least 48 hours before the time of such reconvened or convened meeting, as applicable; (ii) depositing a document that is signed by you (or by someone you have properly authorized to act on your behalf) stating that you wish to revoke your proxy, to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at the registered office of the Company (1 University Avenue, Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5J 2P1) at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof; (iii) notifying the Chair of the Meeting prior to the commencement of the Meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the Meeting that you have revoked your proxy; or (iv) following any other procedure that is permitted by law.
2
If you are a registered shareholder or a duly appointed proxyholder and log in to the Meeting online using your Control Number and accept the terms and conditions, you will be revoking any and all previously submitted proxies, and will be provided the opportunity to vote online by ballot. See “Attending and Voting at the Virtual Meeting” below.
If you are a non-registered shareholder and wish to revoke or change your prior instructions, you must contact your intermediary well in advance of the Meeting and follow its instructions. Intermediaries may set deadlines for the receipt of revocations that are further in advance of the Meeting than those set forth elsewhere in this Circular and related proxy materials and, accordingly, any such revocation should be completed in coordination with your Intermediary well in advance of the deadline for submitting forms of proxy or voting instruction forms to ensure it can be given effect to at the Meeting.
Attending and Voting at the Virtual Meeting
Similar to last year and in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will hold our Meeting in a virtual only format, which will be conducted via a live audio webcast. Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders will have an equal opportunity to attend, participate and vote at the Meeting online. We hope that hosting a virtual Meeting will increase participation by our shareholders, as it will enable shareholders to more easily attend the Meeting regardless of their geographic location. Shareholders will not be able to physically attend the Meeting.
Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders can vote online by ballot at the appropriate times during the Meeting. The control number located on the proxy form or in the email notification you received is your Control Number for purposes of logging in to the Meeting online. See “How to Attend the Meeting” below for additional information on how to log in to the Meeting online.
Non-registered shareholders who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholders may attend the Meeting as guests. Guests will be able to listen to the Meeting online, but will not be able to vote or ask questions at the Meeting. This is because our transfer agent, TSX Trust, does not have a record of the non-registered shareholders of Centerra and, as a result, will have no knowledge of your shareholdings or entitlement to vote, unless you appoint yourself as proxyholder using your voting instruction form. If you are a non-registered shareholder and wish to vote at the Meeting, you must (i) appoint yourself as proxyholder by inserting your own name in the space provided for appointing a proxyholder on the voting instruction form sent to you and (ii) follow all of the applicable instructions, including the deadline, provided by your intermediary. See “How to Attend the Meeting” below for additional information on how to log in to the Meeting online, and see “Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy” below for additional information on how non-registered shareholders can appoint themselves as proxyholder.
How to Attend the Meeting
Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders, including non-registered shareholders who have duly appointed themselves as proxyholder, will be able to attend, participate and vote at the Meeting online at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739. We recommend that you log in at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time), one hour before the Meeting starts. Once you have logged in, select “I have a login” and then enter your Control Number (see below) and password “centerra2022” (case sensitive). You will need the latest versions of Chrome, Safari, Edge or Firefox. Please ensure your browser is compatible by logging in early. PLEASE DO NOT USE INTERNET EXPLORER.
Registered shareholders: The control number located on the form of proxy you received is your Control Number.
Duly appointed proxyholders: TSX Trust will provide the proxyholder with a Control Number after the proxy voting deadline has passed and the proxyholder has been duly appointed AND registered as described in “Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy” below.
3
Guests, including non-registered beneficial shareholders who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholder, can listen to the Meeting. Guests are not able to vote or ask questions at the Meeting. Log in online at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739, select “I am a guest”, and then complete the online registration form.
If you attend the Meeting online, it is important that you remain connected to the internet for the duration of the Meeting in order to vote when balloting commences. It is your responsibility to ensure that you remain connected. Online check-in will begin one hour prior to the Meeting on September 22, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time). The Meeting will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on September 22, 2022, unless otherwise adjourned or postponed. You should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures. For any technical difficulties experienced during the check-in process or during the Meeting, please refer to https://www.lumiglobal.com/faq.
Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders who login to the Meeting with a Control Number can ask questions during the Meeting via the messaging feature on the virtual meeting platform. Questions will generally only be addressed during a question period at the end of the Meeting, however, questions regarding procedural matters or directly related to a specific motion may be addressed during the Meeting. Questions or comments containing inappropriate language (including profanities or hostilities), questions of a personal nature, or questions that are otherwise disruptive to the orderly conduct of the Meeting will not be published or answered. If the Company cannot answer a question during the Meeting because of timing or technical limitations, management will endeavor to respond by email as soon as practical after the Meeting.
Caution: Internal network security protocols including firewalls and VPN connections may block access to the Lumi platform for the Meeting. If you are experiencing any difficulty connecting or watching the Meeting, ensure your VPN setting is disabled or use a computer on a network not restricted to security settings of your organization.
If the Meeting is disrupted for any reason due to technical issues, please remain logged in to the Meeting.
Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy
The following applies to shareholders who wish to appoint someone as their proxyholder other than the Centerra proxyholders named in the enclosed form of proxy or voting instruction form accompanying this Circular. This includes non-registered shareholders who wish to appoint themselves as proxyholder to attend, participate and vote at the Meeting online.
Shareholders who wish to appoint someone other than the Centerra proxyholders named in the enclosed form of proxy as their proxyholder to attend the Meeting as their proxy and vote their Centerra shares MUST submit their form of proxy or voting instruction form, as applicable, appointing that person as proxyholder, AND register that proxyholder online, as described below. Registering your proxyholder is an additional step that must be completed AFTER you have submitted your form of proxy or voting instruction form. Failure to register your proxyholder will result in the proxyholder not receiving a Control Number, which is used as their online sign-in credentials and is required for them to ask questions and vote at the Meeting.
Step 1 - Submit your form of proxy or voting instruction form: To appoint someone as proxyholder other than the Centerra proxyholders, insert that person’s name in the blank space provided in the form of proxy or voting instruction form (if permitted) and follow the instructions for submitting such form of proxy or voting instruction form. This must be completed before registering the proxyholder, which is an additional step completed once you have submitted your form of proxy or voting instruction form.
Step 2 - Register your proxyholder: To register a third-party proxyholder, shareholders must contact TSX Trust and provide TSX Trust with the required proxyholder contact information so that TSX Trust may provide the proxyholder with a Control Number. TSX Trust can be contacted by phone at 1-866-751-6315 (within North America) or 212-235-5754 (outside of North America) or by internet at https://www.tsxtrust.com/control-number-request. Requests for a Control Number must be received by 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on September 20, 2022. Without a Control Number, proxyholders will not be able to ask questions or vote at the Meeting. They will only be able to attend the virtual Meeting online as a guest.
If you are a non-registered shareholder and wish to vote at the Meeting, you must insert your own name in the blank space provided on the voting instruction form sent to you by your intermediary, follow the applicable instructions provided by your intermediary, AND register yourself as your proxyholder, as described below. By doing so, you are instructing your intermediary to appoint you as proxyholder. It is important that you comply with the signature and return instructions provided by your intermediary.
If you are a non-registered shareholder located in the United States and wish to vote at the Meeting, or, if you are permitted, to appoint a third party as your proxyholder, in addition to the steps described above under “How to Attend the Meeting”, you must first obtain a valid legal proxy from your intermediary. You must follow the instructions from your intermediary which are included with the legal proxy form or the voting information form sent to you with this Circular. If you have not received one, you must contact your intermediary to request a legal proxy form or a legal proxy. After obtaining a valid legal proxy from your intermediary, you must then submit such legal proxy to the Company’s transfer agent, TSX Trust by mail at Attn: Proxy Dept., P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario, Canada, M1S 0A1, or by email to proxyvote@tmx.com. The request for registration must be labeled “Legal Proxy” and received by TSX Trust no later than the voting deadline of 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on September 20, 2022 or, if the Meeting is postponed or adjourned, on a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a statutory holiday in the Province of Ontario which is at least 48 hours before the time of such reconvened or convened meeting, as applicable.
4
VOTING COMMON SHARES
Centerra is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Shares and preference shares without par value. On August 19, 2022, the Company had 220,084,174 Shares issued and outstanding. The directors have fixed August 19, 2022 as the record date for the Meeting. Only holders of Shares who are on record on that date will be entitled to vote on the matters proposed to come before the Meeting on the basis of one (1) vote for each Share held.
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES
To the knowledge of the directors and officers of the Company, the only persons or companies who beneficially own, or exercise control or direction over, directly or indirectly, voting securities of the Company carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to any class of voting securities are indicated below:
| Name | Number of Shares | Percentage | ||||||
| BlackRock, Inc.(1) | 37,394,132 | 16.99 | % | |||||
| Van Eck Associates Corporation(2) | 23,259,212 | 10.56 | % | |||||
Source:
(1) Alternative Monthly Reporting System Report on Form 62-103F3 of Blackrock, Inc. dated April 7, 2022, as filed on SEDAR.
(2) Schedule 13G of Van Eck Associates Corporation dated February 4, 2022, as filed on EDGAR.
BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED AT THE MEETING
Financial Statements
The audited financial statements of Centerra for the period ended December 31, 2021 and the auditors’ report thereon will be placed before the Meeting. Copies of the financial statements, together with the auditors’ report thereon, have been provided to shareholders who have validly requested such statements separately and are available under Centerra’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar.
Election of Directors
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) has approved the nomination of the individuals named below for election as directors of Centerra. Each of the nominees is a current director of Centerra and has been since the dates indicated below and was elected to his or her present term as a director by the shareholders of the Company at the annual general meeting of the Company’s shareholders held on May 11, 2021, except Ms. Wendy Kei who was appointed to the Board on May 3, 2022.
Management does not believe that any of the proposed nominees will be unable to serve as a director, but if that should occur for any reason before the Meeting, the management representatives designated in the enclosed form of proxy reserve the right to nominate and vote for another nominee at their discretion, unless otherwise instructed. The form of proxy permits shareholders to vote for or against each nominee. Each director elected will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor is elected or appointed.
Majority Voting and Advance Notice Nominations
In accordance with the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “CBCA”), at uncontested shareholder meetings held on or after August 31, 2022, any director nominee receiving more “against” votes than “for” votes will not be elected. However, under the CBCA majority voting rules, if an incumbent director is not elected by a majority of votes at the Meeting, the incumbent director will be permitted to continue in office until the earlier of (i) the 90th day after the Meeting and (ii) the day on which their successor is appointed or elected.
5
In addition, in order to ensure that all shareholders have sufficient time and information to properly review all director nominees, the Company’s by-laws require that all director nominations be made with sufficient notice and provide certain prescribed information concerning such director nominees. For further information, please refer to “Report on Corporate Governance – Majority Voting and Advance Notice Nominations” on page 44.
Board Nominee Information
According to the Company’s constating documents, the Board shall have between 3 and 15 directors.
The Company considers diversity of background, skills, age, culture, geography, experience, and gender when reviewing potential director candidates, and the nine directors nominated this year represent a strong and diverse mix of experience in finance, mining, engineering, sustainability, government relations, Indigenous relations, risk management, legal, metallurgy, mergers and acquisitions and international business – key skills for overseeing the Company’s affairs and guiding its strategic growth. See also “Diversity of the Company’s Directors and Officers” on page 48.
The following tables set out the name and biographical information of each nominee, including present principal occupation, principal occupations and directorships during the past five years and whether or not the nominee has been determined by the Board to be independent of Centerra under Canadian securities laws. The table below also sets out each nominee’s appointment date to Centerra’s Board (where applicable), attendance at Board and standing Committee meetings during 2021, other public company directorships, and minimum ownership requirement. All nominees are in compliance with their minimum ownership requirements. For further information on the breakdown of the Directors’ Share ownership, see “Report on Executive Compensation –Directors’ Share Ownership” on page 39.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote in favour of each of the following nominees as directors of Centerra. Unless otherwise instructed, the management representatives designated in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote FOR the election as directors of the proposed nominees whose names are set out below.
6
MICHAEL S. PARRETT
Age: 70
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
Independent(1): Yes
Director since:
May 8, 2014
Mr. Parrett has served as a director of Centerra since May 2014 and was appointed Chair of the Board on October 1, 2019. Mr. Parrett is an independent consultant and corporate director and has previously served as a director of Stillwater Mining Company from 2009 to 2017, Pengrowth Energy Corporation from 2004 to 2016, Gabriel Resources Limited from 2003 to 2010 (including as Chairman from 2005 to 2010) and Fording Canadian Coal Trust from 2003 to 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Parrett was the CFO and the President of Rio Algom Limited and CFO of Falconbridge Limited. Mr. Parrett is a Chartered Professional Accountant and received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from York University.
| BOARD / COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE(2) | |
| Board (Chair) | 9/9 | |
| Audit Committee | 5/5 | |
| Human Resources and Compensation Committee | 6/6 | |
| Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | 6/6 |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
None
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS(3)
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022)(4) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 1,209,367 | $930,000 by October 1, 2024 | Yes | |||
RICHARD W. CONNOR
Age: 73
Location: Columbine Valley, Colorado, U.S.A.
Independent(1): Yes
Director since:
June 5, 2012
Mr. Connor has over 25 years of experience as an audit partner with KPMG LLP in the United States, principally for publicly traded clients in a variety of industries, including Energy and Mining, and Media and Telecommunications. Mr. Connor retired from KPMG LLP in 2009, where he served as the Managing Partner of the KPMG Denver Office from 1996 to 2008. Mr. Connor was elected to the firm’s partnership in 1980 and was appointed to the firm’s SEC Reviewing Partners Committee in 1987, where he served until his retirement. Mr. Connor earned his BS degree in Accounting from the University of Colorado.
| BOARD / COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE(2) | |
| Board | 8/9 | |
| Audit Committee (Chair) | 5/5 | |
| Risk Committee | 5/5 | |
| Human Resources & Compensation Committee | 6/6 | |
| Special Committee | 13/13 |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
None
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS(3)
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022)(4) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 653,957 | $526,500 by January 1, 2023 | Yes | |||
7
WENDY KEI
Age: 54
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Independent: Yes
Director since:
May 4, 2022
Ms. Kei is an accomplished finance executive with over 25 years of business experience across multiple industries. She currently serves as Board Chair for Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG), serves on the board of NFI Group Inc. and is the Chair of the Audit Committee for Noranda Income Fund (TSX:NIF). Ms. Kei previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Dominion Diamond Corporation.
In 2022, Ms. Kei was honoured as a Fellow from the Institute of Corporate Directors (F.ICD), named BMO Celebrate Women on Boards 2022 Honouree and in 2020, she was selected one of Canada’s Top 100 Most Powerful Women and was honoured as a Fellow Chartered Professional Accountant (FCPA-FCA) designation. In 2016, she was selected as a Diversity 50 Candidate by the Canadian Board Diversity Council.
Ms. Kei is a Fellow of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario, holds a Fellow designation from the Institute of Corporate Directors and holds a Bachelor of Mathematics from the University of Waterloo.
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
NFI Group Inc. (Audit, Human Resources and Compensation and Corporate Governance), Noranda Income Fund (Audit, Governance and Human Resources, Independent, Risk)
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022)(4) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 19,397 | $526,500 by May 3, 2027 | In progress | |||
JACQUES PERRON
Age: 61
Location: Centennial, Colorado, U.S.A.
Independent(1): Yes
Director since:
October 20, 2016
Mr. Perron is a corporate director and was appointed as a director of Centerra in October 2016, following the closing of the Company’s acquisition of Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc., where he served as President and CEO and director. Mr. Perron was President and CEO of Pretium Resources Inc. from April 2020 to March 9, 2022. Mr. Perron formerly served as a director of Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. from 2016 to 2018. His previous senior management positions include serving as President and CEO of St. Andrew Goldfields Ltd. from 2007 to 2013, Senior Vice President of IAMGOLD Corporation from 2006 to 2007 and Vice President, Canada of Cambior Inc. from 2004 to 2006. From 1984 to 2004, Mr. Perron held a variety of increasingly senior management positions with Cameco Corporation, Placer Dome Canada Limited, Breakwater Resources Ltd., Cambior Inc., JS Redpath Ltd. and Noranda Inc. Mr. Perron has also been a director of the Canadian Mineral Industry Education Foundation since 2007. Mr. Perron has a Bachelor of Science degree in Mining Engineering from l’École Polytechnique de Montréal.
| BOARD / COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE(2) | |
| Board | 9/9 | |
| Risk Committee (Chair) | 5/5 | |
| Sustainable Operations Committee | 5/5 | |
| Special | 6/6 |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
None
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS(3)
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022)(4) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 792,552 | $526,500 by May 1, 2023 | Yes | |||
8
SCOTT G. PERRY
Age: 46
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Independent(1): No
Director since:
January 1, 2016
Mr. Perry has over 23 years of international experience in the mining industry and was appointed Centerra’s CEO as of November 1, 2015 and assumed the title of President in January 2018. Mr. Perry was appointed as a director of Centerra on January 1, 2016. Prior to joining Centerra, he served as CEO & Director of AuRico Gold and, prior to that, he acted as Executive Vice President & CFO of AuRico Gold. Prior to joining AuRico Gold, Mr. Perry held increasingly senior financial roles with Barrick Gold in Australia, the United States, and Russia & Central Asia. Mr. Perry holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from Curtin University, a post-graduate diploma in applied finance and investment and a CPA designation.
| BOARD / COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE(2) | |
| Board | 9/9 |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
None
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS(3)(5)
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement (as executive) | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 5,866,865 | $2,625,000 by January 1, 2026 | Yes | |||
SHERYL K. PRESSLER
Age: 71
Location: Atlanta, Georgia U.S.A.
Independent(1): Yes
Director since:
May 7, 2008
Ms. Pressler is currently an investment and strategy consultant in Atlanta, Georgia. From 2000 to 2001, she served as CEO of Lend Lease Real Estate Investments United States. From 1994 to 2000, she served as Chief Investment Officer of California Public Employees’ Retirement System. Prior thereto, she was responsible for the investment management of the retirement funds for the McDonnell Douglas Corporation. Ms. Pressler received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Webster University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Washington University. Ms. Pressler served on the board of directors of Stillwater Mining Company from 2002 until 2013 and currently serves on the board of trustees of a number of funds managed by Voya Investment Management.
| BOARD / COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE(2) | |
| Board | 9/9 | |
| Audit Committee | 5/5(6) | |
| Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) | 6/6(6) | |
| Risk | 3/3 | |
| Special Committee | 13/13 |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
None
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS(3)
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022)(4) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 595,797 | $526,500 by May 1, 2023 | Yes | |||
9
BRUCE V. WALTER

Age: 64
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Independent(1): Yes
Director since:
May 7, 2008
Mr. Walter is currently Chairman of Nunavut Iron Ore, Inc. and serves as Vice Chair of Centerra. From 2002 until 2007, Mr. Walter was a director and officer of Dynatec Corporation, initially as Vice-Chairman and from 2005 as President and CEO. Prior thereto his career included serving as President of Sherritt Inc., President and CEO of Plaintree Systems Inc., and Managing Director and Co-Head of the Media, Telecom & Technology investment and corporate banking group at BMO Nesbitt Burns. Mr. Walter also served as Vice-President of Horsham Corporation and was a partner in the predecessor law firm to Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP. Mr. Walter received his Juris Doctor (J.D.) and Master of Business Administration degrees from York University in 1981. He received his Ph.D. in law in 1985 from the University of Cape Town. Mr. Walter is a director of the Westaim Corporation and serves on the National Advisory Board of The Salvation Army.
| BOARD / COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE(2) | |
| Board | 9/9 | |
| Sustainable Operations Committee (Chair) | 5/5 | |
| Special (Chair) | 13/13 |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
The Westaim Corporation (Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance)
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS(3)
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022)(4) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 2,179,449 | $840,000 by May 17, 2021 | Yes | |||
PAUL N. WRIGHT

Age: 68
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Independent(1): Yes
Director since:
May 1, 2020
Mr. Wright is a corporate director and has over 40 years of experience in developing and operating open pit and underground gold mines. Mr. Wright retired from Eldorado Gold Corp. in April 2017 after 21 years, where he served as President and CEO starting from October 1999. Prior to his tenure at Eldorado, he worked with Placer Dome, the Redpath Group and Granges. Mr. Wright is a Chartered Engineer (UK) and obtained his B.Sc. Mining Engineering from Newcastle University.
| BOARD / COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE(2) | |
| Board | 9/9 | |
| Risk Committee | 5/5 | |
| Sustainable Operations Committee | 5/5 | |
| Special | 4/6 |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
Galiano Gold Inc.
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS(3)
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022)(4) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 360,454 | $526,500 by May 1, 2025 | In progress | |||
10
SUSAN L. YURKOVICH

Age:57
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Independent(1): Yes
Director since:
May 1, 2018
Ms. Yurkovich is currently serving as President of the B.C. Lumber Trade Council. Ms. Yurkovich has over 25 years’ experience working in the natural resources sector, as past President and CEO of the Council of Forest Industries, Executive Vice-President at B.C. Hydro, and Vice-President at Canfor Corporation. She is currently a Director of Fortis BC and Vancouver College, and a member of the Faculty Advisory Board at the Sauder School of Business at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Ms. Yurkovich holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Masters of Business Administration from UBC, and a diploma in international business from Erasmus University, Netherlands and the ICD.D designation from the Institute of Corporate Directors.
| BOARD / COMMITTEE | ATTENDANCE(2) | |
| Board | 9/9 | |
| Human Resources & Compensation Committee (Chair) | 6/6 | |
| Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee | 6/6 | |
| Sustainable Operations Committee | 5/5 | |
| Special | 6/6 |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS (COMMITTEES)
None
COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTOR SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS(3)
| Share Ownership Calculation (as of July 15, 2022)(4) | Minimum Share Ownership requirement | In Compliance with Requirement | ||||
| $ | 764,827 | $526,500 by May 1, 2023 | Yes | |||
| (1) | For further information on independence, see “Report on Corporate Governance – Independence of Board Members” on page 44. |
| (2) | Attendance reflects the number of meetings held during 2021 in which the relevant director was a member of such committee. |
| (3) | The minimum Share ownership requirement for directors is three times their annual retainer (from time to time) to be achieved within a period of five years of becoming a director. When a director receives an increase in his/her annual retainer, which would result in an increase to his/her ownership requirement, the director has five years from the date of such increase to achieve the incremental Share ownership requirement. The minimum Share ownership level set out in the table above reflects the ownership requirement based on their current annual retainer. |
| (4) | Share ownership level for directors reflects the value of Shares, Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”) and Director Restricted Share Units (“Director RSUs”), held by the director. When calculating the value of the Share ownership of directors, Shares held are valued at the higher of (i) cost (“Book Value” for the Shares) and (ii) current fair market value based on the five-day volume weighted average price (“VWAP”). DSUs and Director RSUs are valued at the greater of (i) the fair market value at the date of award/grant (the “Book Value” for DSUs and Director RSUs) and the current fair market value (five-day VWAP) as of July 15, 2022. For a breakdown of the number of Shares, DSUs and Director RSUs held by each director, and Share ownership calculation, see “Report on Executive Compensation - Directors’ Share Ownership” on page 39 for further information. |
| (5) | Mr. Perry is subject to minimum Share ownership requirements for executives and is required to attain a level of Share ownership equivalent to 3 times his basic annual salary, one third of which must be in the form of Shares. Shares are valued at the higher of cost at acquisition and current fair market value, performance share units (“PSUs”) are valued based on the intended value of the PSU at the time of grant, and RSUs are valued based on the value of the annual incentive plan (bonus) directed by the executive to purchase RSUs plus the Company match component of RSUs. Options are not used in the determination of whether Share ownership requirements are satisfied. See “Report on Executive Compensation – Executive Share Ownership” on page 28 for further information. |
| (6) | Ms. Pressler stepped down from the Audit Committee and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee in the first quarter of 2022. |
2021 Shareholder Support
The table below sets out the voting results at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of shareholders for the incumbent director nominees standing for election at the Meeting.
| Nominee | Votes For | Votes For (%) | Votes Withheld | Votes Withheld (%) | |||||||||||
| Richard W. Connor | 163,036,014 | 98.25 | % | 2,906,870 | 1.75 | % | |||||||||
| Michael S. Parrett | 156,884,743 | 94.54 | % | 9,058,141 | 5.46 | % | |||||||||
| Jacques Perron | 157,323,574 | 94.81 | % | 8,619,310 | 5.19 | % | |||||||||
| Scott G. Perry | 163,997,870 | 98.83 | % | 1,945,014 | 1.17 | % | |||||||||
| Sheryl K. Pressler | 115,323,101 | 69.50 | % | 50,619,783 | 30.50 | % | |||||||||
| Bruce V. Walter | 161,892,447 | 97.56 | % | 4,050,437 | 2.44 | % | |||||||||
| Paul N. Wright | 165,903,240 | 99.98 | % | 39,644 | 0.02 | % | |||||||||
| Susan L. Yurkovich | 161,335,365 | 97.22 | % | 4,607,519 | 2.78 | % | |||||||||
11
Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions
To Centerra’s knowledge, no nominee for director is or has been in the last 10 years a director, Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer of any company that: (a) was subject to an order that was issued while the nominee was acting in that capacity, or (b) was subject to an order that was issued after the nominee ceased to act in that capacity and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in that capacity. For the purposes of the foregoing, “order” means (i) a cease trade order, (ii) an order similar to a cease trade order, or (iii) an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, which was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days.
Other than as noted below, to Centerra’s knowledge, no nominee for director: (a) is or has been in the last 10 years a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets, or (b) has in the last 10 years become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the proposed director.
Mr. Wright was a director of Nordic Mines AB (“Nordic”) until November 17, 2012. On July 8, 2013, within one year of Mr. Wright ceasing to be a director, Nordic announced that it had requested a Court appointed Administrator for itself and its Swedish and Finnish subsidiaries. The appointment of the Swedish Administrator was terminated by the District Court of Uppsala in a decision on September 1, 2014, when an agreement on debt write-off was entered into between Nordic and its creditors and lenders.
Mr. Perry was a director of Lachlan Star Limited, a mining company based in Australia. He ceased being a director in October 2014. In February 2015, Lachlan Star Limited entered into voluntary administration.
Mr. Parrett was a director of Mongolia Minerals Corporation (a private company involved in mining investments in Mongolia) which was granted creditor protection under the Companies Creditors’ Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) on June 16, 2014. The CCAA proceedings were terminated in February 2015 and Mr. Parrett resigned on February 20, 2015.
Appointment of Auditors
It is proposed that the KPMG LLP be re-appointed as auditor of the Company to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and that the Board be authorized to fix their remuneration. KPMG LLP was first appointed auditor of the Company on May 10, 2005.
Audit, tax and other fees billed by KPMG LLP in respect of the financial years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
| Fee Type | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Audit Fees | $ | 1,517,073 | $ | 1,125,430 | ||||
| Audit Related Fees(1) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
| Tax Fees(2) | $ | 30,032 | $ | 38,458 | ||||
| All Other Fees(3) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
| Total | $ | 1,547,105 | $ | 1,166,888 | ||||
| (1) | Audit related fees in 2021 and 2020 included interim reviews of the consolidated financial statement. |
| (2) | Tax fees comprise amounts billed for transfer pricing advisory services, tax compliance and tax advisory services. |
| (3) | All non-audit services to be provided by KPMG LLP must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. |
The Board recommends that shareholders vote in favour of the re-appointment of KPMG LLP as auditor of the Company, to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders, and the authorization of the Board to fix their remuneration. Unless otherwise instructed, the management representatives designated in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote FOR the re-appointment of KPMG LLP as auditor of the Company, to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders, and to authorize the Board to fix their remuneration.
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
The Board believes that the Company’s compensation program must be competitive with companies in its peer group, provide a strong incentive to its executives to achieve Centerra’s business and financial objectives and ensure that interests of management are aligned with the short and long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders. Centerra believes that its compensation program is consistent with those objectives and are in the best interest of shareholders. A detailed discussion of the Company’s executive compensation program is provided under ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis’’ starting on page 19 of this Circular.
12
In connection with the Company’s separation from the Kyrgyz Republic and related governance changes, the Board has resolved to provide shareholders with a ‘‘Say on Pay’’ advisory vote on the Company’s approach to executive compensation, which is intended to form an important part of the ongoing engagement between shareholders and the Board. At the meeting, shareholders will be asked to consider, and if deemed advisable, approve the following advisory resolution:
Resolved, on an advisory basis and not to diminish the role and responsibilities of the Board, the shareholders accept the approach to executive compensation disclosed in the Company’s management information circular delivered in respect of the 2022 annual general meeting of shareholders.
Because this vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Board and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will take the outcome of the vote into account in their ongoing review of executive compensation.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote in favour of the resolution to accept the Company’s approach to executive compensation. Unless otherwise instructed, the management representatives designated in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote FOR the approval of the resolution to accept the Company’s approach to executive compensation.
13
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Letter from the Human Resources and Compensation Committee
Dear Centerra Shareholders,
On behalf of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the “HRC Committee”), I am pleased to provide an overview of our 2021 performance and summary of how executive compensation outcomes for the year aligned with performance.
2021 marked one of the most challenging years in the history of Centerra. As the year began, the COVID-19 pandemic continued to hamper operations and the team worked to minimize the effects on our business. Then in May 2021, the organization was faced with unprecedented challenges arising from the imposition of external management on the Kumtor mine by the Kyrgyz Government, effectively removing the mine from management’s control and creating significant uncertainty for employees, the company and our shareholders. This event required an immediate re-focusing of the team to develop a plan to address this extraordinary event, while continuing to drive shareholder value through the operations of the remaining mines. Through the collective effort and dedication of approximately 1,000 Centerra employees around the world, the Company was able to manage through these significant challenges and is well positioned for future growth now that the situation with the Kyrgyz Republic has been resolved.
The events of 2021 made the evaluation of 2021 corporate performance difficult. Throughout the year, and with advice of our compensation advisors, the HRC Committee considered various alternative approaches to evaluate company performance, including different scenarios with recalibrated 2021 targets that both included and excluded the Kumtor mine. After careful consideration and while acknowledging that our overall performance in 2021 was overshadowed by the situation at Kumtor, the HRC Committee decided that a recalibration of the 2021 Company targets was appropriate.
In making this determination, the HRC considered many factors including the fact that the corporate performance multiplier impacts the annual incentive of employees at all levels of the organization, and, absent a recalibration, employees would be unfairly punished for an event that was not within their control and unrelated to their performance. This approach also aligned our annual company performance assessment to the reported 2021 consolidated financial statements. As such, the results quoted below have been compared to recalibrated targets that include the Kumtor mine until the date external management was imposed.
Reviewing 2021 Performance
In 2021, we exceeded our consolidated gold production and cost guidance, delivering more than 447,000 ounces of gold at an all-in sustaining cost on a by-product basis, excluding revenue-based taxes, of US$803 per ounce sold. Gold production was higher than maximum target and exceeded the high-end of gold production guidance. All-in sustaining cost on a by-product basis (excluding revenue-based taxes) was also better than maximum target and lower than guidance. Net losses for the year totaled $381.8 million or $1.29 per share, including derecognition of the Kumtor mine, and the impairment reversal at the Mount Milligan mine. Adjusted net earnings for the year of $233.6 million or $0.79 per share reflects Kumtor operations until May 2021. Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations (excluding Kumtor completely) totaled $149.3 million, a 115% increase from 2020, indicating continued strong performance from our two operating mines Mount Milligan and Öksüt.
We are pleased to have advanced a number of Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) initiatives during the year. We operated throughout the year without a material environmental event at any of our operations. In addition, our year two requirements for the World Gold Council Responsible Gold Mining Principles (“RGMP”) implementation were achieved with RGMP self-assessments completed, a Company-wide roadmap to conformance signed off by the executive team and year two assurance completed. Significant progress was also made in our Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (“DE&I”) journey with a global current state assessment completed and recommendations presented to the Executive DE&I Council, Regional DE&I Committees, and the Senior Leadership Team. Additionally, the creation of global and regional strategies to advance our performance were under development.
Unfortunately, our consolidated safety performance was disappointing. We ended the year with a Company-wide Total Reportable Injury Frequency Rate of 0.69, which underperformed our target of 0.41 due to several incidents at our Mount Milligan mine. This resulted in a zero rating for safety in 2021. Despite the disappointing overall safety score, the Company did recognize the following important milestones during the year ended December 31, 2021: the Öksüt mine achieved two million work hours without a lost-time injury, the Thomson Creek mine, Langeloth facility and Kemess UG project each achieved one full year without a lost-time injury, and the Endako mine achieved eight years without a lost-time injury. We remain committed to improving our current safety record through the expansion of our safety training programs and an increase of on-site resources dedicated to support health and safety.
14
Financially, the Company generated cash provided by operating activities (including Kumtor until May 2021) of $392 million which was higher than maximum target. The Company ended the year with more than $1.3 billion of total liquidity (cash of $947 million and an undrawn $400 million Corporate Credit Facility), positioning Centerra well for future growth.
Finally, we continued to progress on our longer-term strategy, including assessing both organic and inorganic growth opportunities. The objective to increase organic gold equivalent ounces resource growth exceeded maximum target with the release of the updated mineral reserve and mineral resources estimates for the Mount Milligan mine, the Öksüt mine and the Kemess property as of December 31, 2021. We also completed a US$400 million refinancing of the Company’s revolving line of credit in the first quarter of 2021 and later amended the agreement to allow for the availability of US$340 million of distributions to shareholders, achieving the target and maximum performance level results in this area. However, disappointingly, our efforts to pursue a value enhancing divestiture strategy for the Kemess asset were unsuccessful.
Alignment with Compensation Outcomes
As outlined above, the HRC Committee performed a thorough review of 2021 performance, and for the purposes of determining the appropriate corporate performance multiplier for 2021, made the decision to recalibrate Centerra’s 2021 performance objectives to include the Kumtor mine results until the date external management was imposed. Corporate annual performance was assessed against the new targets and, despite an extremely challenging year, the Company was able to meet most recalibrated targets, resulting in a corporate performance multiplier of 110%. However, in addition to the disciplined quantitative approach that the HRC Committee and the Board have taken, business judgement was also applied to assess the reasonableness of the overall results given the loss of shareholder value following the imposition of external management on the Kumtor mine. As a result, the HRC Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the application of discretion, capping the 2021 corporate performance multiplier at 100%. This included a score of 0% on Safety and scores near target or maximum performance on most other measures.
The HRC Committee and the Board also applied discretion to reduce the CEO’s individual performance assessment, approving an 85% score for individual performance goals. The same discretion was applied for all other named executive officers, capping individual performance at 100%.
The 100% corporate performance multiplier, together with an assessment of 85% for individual performance goals, resulted in the CEO’s annual incentive plan award approved at $929,688. Among the other named executive officers, annual incentive plan awards ranged from $289,250 to $411,840.
PSUs granted in 2019 and 2020 vested at the end of December 2021 and settled in January 2022. In alignment with share price appreciation and the experience of investors, executives received payments with a value above the original grant date value for 2019 grants and a value below the original grant date value for 2020 grants. Payouts from grants made in 2019 were paid out at an adjustment factor of 1.17 times; payouts from grants made in 2020 were paid out at an adjustment factor of 0.44 times, reflecting the impact on Share price following the seizure of the Kumtor mine.
HRC Committee Activities
The HRC Committee undertook a series of initiatives in 2021, including ongoing oversight of executive compensation, governance and succession planning. Other HRC Committee activities in 2021 included:
| · | Reviewing the Company’s industry peer group for assessing executive and board of director compensation, resulting in a revised comparator group with the addition of Equinox Gold Corp. and the removal of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, Kinross Gold Corporation, and Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. to better align with the Company’s size and scope; |
| · | Reviewing market trends and best practices for executive compensation design, prepared by the HRC Committee’s independent advisor; |
| · | Reviewing the competitiveness of compensation levels for senior executives; |
| · | Reviewing bi-annually the competitiveness of compensation levels for directors; |
| · | Continuing to progress the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion program further described in this Circular; and |
| · | Enhancing shareholder disclosure as part of the enclosed Compensation Discussion & Analysis. |
15
Key Areas of Focus for 2022
The HRC Committee remains focused on aligning pay outcomes with the execution of the Company’s overall strategy. The annual incentive plan for fiscal 2022 will reflect modest changes to the defined measures and relative weights of certain measures, included to reinforce key performance objectives, including:
| Category | Performance Measure(s) | |
| Environmental, Social & Governance (includes Health & Safety) – remains at 25% | Total Reportable Injury Frequency Rate at 10%, Environment Incidents Rate at 5%. Specific targets set for World Gold Council Responsible Gold Mining Principles (“RGMP”) implementation and diversity, equity and inclusion. | |
| Operating & Financial Performance – remains at 55% | Gold & Copper Production
– Gold production decreased from 25% to 20% while copper production increased from 5% to 10% respectively. | |
| Growth & Value Creation – remains at 20% | Varies by year and aligned with the Company’s Strategic Plan. |
In addition, in connection with the Company’s separation from the Kyrgyz Republic and related governance changes, the Board is providing shareholders with a “Say on Pay” advisory vote on the Company’s approach to executive compensation, which is intended to form an important part of the ongoing engagement between shareholders and the Board.
Annual General Meeting
I trust this letter provides a summary of Centerra’s performance in 2021 and the HRC Committee’s rationale for compensation decisions made for the CEO and other Named Executive Officers. I hope you will participate in the Meeting, and I encourage you to ask questions of me or any of the other members of the HRC Committee on issues of interest to you.
| Yours truly, | |
| (signed) “Susan L. Yurkovich” | |
| Susan L. Yurkovich | |
| Chair, Human Resources and Compensation Committee | |
| August 19, 2022 |
16
Compensation Governance
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Composition
The current members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board (the “HRC Committee”) are Ms. Yurkovich (Chair), Mr. Connor, and Mr. Parrett, each of whom is independent of Centerra. The Board has adopted a formal charter for the HRC Committee, which provides that one of the primary purposes of the HRC Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to the selection, retention and compensation of the CEO and senior management. See “Report on Corporate Governance – Committees of the Board of Directors” on page 45 for a detailed description of the HRC Committee charter.
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Expertise
Each of the three HRC Committee members has considerable prior experience in human resources and compensation matters. The specific experience of each HRC Committee member relevant to serving on the HRC Committee is set out below.
| · | Ms. Yurkovich has been on the HRC Committee since her appointment to the Board on May 1, 2018 and became Chair of the HRC Committee on October 1, 2019. She has significant compensation experience having served as a senior executive for more than 20 years, including overseeing compensation and benefits administration in her role as President and CEO of the B.C. Council of Forest Industries, as well as in her previous roles as an executive at Canfor Corporation and B.C. Hydro. |
| · | Mr. Connor spent 38 years practicing public accounting at KPMG, including time spent as the managing partner of the Denver office, where he oversaw compensation matters, including incentive plans for 400 employees. He has also previously served on the compensation committee of Zayo Group Holdings Inc. |
| · | Mr. Parrett is the Chair of the Board and previously served as the Chair of the HRC Committee from May 1, 2018 until October 1, 2019. Mr. Parrett has significant experience as a public company director and has previously served on the compensation committees of Stillwater Mining Company, Pengrowth Energy Corporation, where he served as chair of the Compensation Committee, and of Gabriel Resources Limited, where he served as chair of the Board of Directors and as chair of its Compensation Committee. |
Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s Role in Setting Executive Compensation
The HRC Committee, with the assistance of outside advisors, as appropriate, is involved in setting and reviewing executive compensation in the following ways:
| · | It annually reviews the executive compensation programs of the Company’s comparator group to benchmark Centerra’s executive compensation level and practices, including base salaries, and applicable targets for short-term and long-term incentive awards to executives. |
| · | It annually reviews the Company’s compensation framework to ensure that it is designed to meet the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives and encourages executives and other employees to carry out the Company’s objectives within the Company’s risk appetite. Such review includes evaluating the relative weighting of fixed and variable (or “at risk”) compensation, such as PSUs, restricted share units (“RSUs”) and options (“Options”) to acquire Shares. |
| · | It annually reviews and approves (or recommends to the Board for approval, where required) the Company’s targets for its annual incentive plan, taking into consideration Centerra’s corporate objectives and potential risks that the Company may face or that are inherent in the industry and the Company’s overall risk appetite. The review process is carried out with the involvement of other Board committees, including the Sustainable Operations Committee. The HRC Committee also annually reviews, with the assistance of other Board committees, the achievement of such targets. |
| · | It makes recommendations to the Board regarding compensation and objectives for the CEO. |
| · | It reviews and approves compensation for the executives who report directly to the CEO. |
| · | It retains discretion to create, modify or reduce incentive awards, including bonuses, PSUs, RSUs and Options. |
| · | It reviews Share ownership requirements and confirms that executives are compliant with such requirements. |
17
| · | It reviews, every two years, the board compensation programs of the Company’s comparator group to benchmark Centerra’s board compensation and makes recommendations to the Board as appropriate. |
| · | It reviews, as applicable, the Company’s Statement of Executive Compensation and similar public disclosure to ensure transparent disclosure to shareholders, with clear explanations of the process and rationale for pay decisions that demonstrate how pay aligns with Company performance. |
Managing Compensation-Related Risk
Annually, the HRC Committee reviews the Company’s compensation policies and practices to assess risks associated with them. This review is conducted by independent external advisors who also provide regular updates to the HRC regarding compensation related risks and corporate governance matters affecting compensation practices.
Centerra uses the following practices to discourage or mitigate excessive risk-taking:
| · | Incentive awards are based on multiple metrics, including metrics related to health and safety, environment and sustainability, production and cost metrics and growth. Such awards are based on individual and Company objectives ensuring that awards align with the Company’s priorities for the year; |
| · | Centerra has mandatory minimum Share ownership requirements for executives and directors; |
| · | Centerra’s incentive programs provide for deferred vesting of Options, PSUs, and RSUs (Employee RSUs and Discretionary RSUs, as further described below), with overlapping vesting periods, so that executives remain exposed to the risks of their decisions and the vesting periods align with risk realization periods; |
| · | Centerra utilizes an appropriate compensation mix, including fixed and performance-based compensation, with short and longer-term performance conditions and multiple forms of compensation; |
| · | Executives have the ability to take all or a portion of their annual incentive payments in Employee RSUs with a Company match – further aligning such executive’s interests with those of shareholders; |
| · | Incentive awards are reasonable in relation to salary and payouts are capped to ensure there is no unlimited upside; |
| · | Centerra has a claw-back policy that requires employees to reimburse short and long-term incentive and other awards received due to the unlikely event of irregularities in financial reporting or employee misconduct. The claw-back policy was modified in 2020 to better align with market practices, including confirming the scope of employees and compensation subject to the policy; |
| · | Centerra has a written corporate disclosure and insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits directors and employees of Centerra from hedging the value of any equity-based awards or Shares; |
| · | The HRC Committee may exercise discretion in assessing components of the annual incentive performance; and |
| · | The HRC Committee retains independent advisors who provide it with an external perspective on best practices in the market relating to executive compensation matters, compensation governance and risk management. |
A full review of compensation-related risk is completed by the independent advisor every two to three years and overseen by the HRC Committee. The last full review and report was completed in December 2020. The HRC Committee concluded at that time that there were no risks arising from Centerra’s executive compensation programs that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Centerra. In 2021, the HRC Committee’s independent advisors reviewed, at a high level, the risk associated with the Company’s compensation practices and concluded the same.
Human Resources and Compensation Consultant Fees
The following chart shows the aggregate fees paid to human resources consultants or advisors, or any of their affiliates, for consulting services (excluding purchased surveys) related to determining compensation for any of the Company’s directors and executive officers, for the past two financial years.
| Amounts Paid in 2021 | Amounts Paid in 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Consultant | Executive Compensation Related Fees | All Other Fees(1) | Executive Compensation Related Fees | All Other Fees(1) | ||||||||||||
| Korn Ferry Hay Group | - | $ | 2,392 | - | $ | 3,588 | ||||||||||
| Willis Towers Watson | $ | 146,900 | $ | 157,303 | $ | 198,608 | - | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 146,900 | $ | 159,695 | $ | 198,608 | $ | 3,588 | ||||||||
| (1) | In 2020 and 2021, “All Other Fees” for Korn Ferry Hay Group were related to Black – Scholes valuation pricing. In 2021, “All Other Fees” for Willis Towers Watson were related to consulting services to assist with the creation of a global compensation framework for non-executive roles. |
18
Centerra has engaged WTW (formerly Willis Towers Watson) since 2013 on ad hoc matters. Starting in early 2019, the HRC Committee engaged WTW to be the independent external compensation advisor to the HRC Committee and the Board. In 2021, WTW’s engagement included advising the HRC Committee on the annual review of its comparator group, providing a report on current trends in executive compensation and governance, a review of director compensation and benchmarking the Company’s compensation for executives.
From time to time, management may also engage WTW to provide consulting services. While neither the Board nor the HRC Committee is required by their mandates to pre-approve other services the HRC Committee consultant or advisor (or any of its affiliates) provides to the Company at the request of management, the Company’s practice has been for the Chair of the HRC Committee to pre-approve such engagements to ensure independence and transparency.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Named Executive Officers
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis discusses the compensation of Centerra’s CEO, CFO and its three other most highly compensated executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) in 2021:
| Scott Perry | President & Chief Executive Officer | |
| Darren Millman | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer | |
| Daniel Desjardins(1) | Vice President & Chief Operating Officer | |
| Dennis Kwong | Vice President, Business Development and Exploration | |
| Yousef Rehman | Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary |
| (1) | Mr. Desjardins retired from the Company on May 4, 2022 |
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Centerra’s executive compensation program is intended to support the Company’s business and financial objectives, and is designed to attract, retain, and motivate executives and align their interests with the short and long-term interests of Centerra’s shareholders by:
| · | providing compensation levels competitive with comparator group companies in the mining industry; |
| · | linking executive compensation to corporate performance and the creation of shareholder value; |
| · | promoting prudent risk taking in accordance with the Company’s risk appetite; |
| · | rewarding the achievement of corporate and individual performance objectives; and |
| · | promoting internal equity and a disciplined qualitative and quantitative assessment of performance. |
19
Benchmarking Compensation
Compensation Comparator Group
In July and September 2021, the annual review of the group of companies used by the Company as a reference for determining competitive total compensation packages was conducted by the Company’s external advisors. The comparator group is selected from North American-based, publicly traded, gold and diversified metal and mining companies with whom Centerra competes for executive and other professional talent. Key selection considerations include size, operating complexity and international scope, and organizational structure. Following that review and considering the effect that the loss of the Kumtor mine had on the Company’s financials, the Company revised the comparator group to add Equinox Gold Corp. and to remove three of its largest peers, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, Kinross Gold Corporation and Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. With those changes, the Company’s current comparator group comprises the following twelve companies:
| Alamos Gold Inc. | Equinox Gold Corp. | Pan American Silver Corp |
| B2Gold Corp. | IAMGOLD Corporation | Pretium Resources Inc. |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. | Lundin Mining Corporation | SSR Mining Inc. |
| Eldorado Gold Corporation | New Gold Inc. | Yamana Gold Inc. |
Components of Executive Compensation
Centerra’s compensation program is designed to provide its executive officers with total compensation targeted at the 50th percentile of its comparator group of companies when Company and individual performance objectives are achieved, with the opportunity for additional compensation when performance exceeds predetermined targets.
Centerra’s executive compensation program is comprised of four components:
| · | base salary; |
| · | annual cash incentive plan compensation; |
| · | mid-term and long-term incentive plan compensation made up of Share-based awards and Options; and |
| · | employee benefits and executive perquisites, including a Supplementary Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) in the form of a Retirement Compensation Arrangement (“RCA”) Trust. |
The HRC Committee annually reviews the various elements of compensation to ensure alignment with the goals of Centerra and each executive officer, as well as Centerra’s compensation objectives and philosophy. While the precise proportions of executive compensation will vary from year to year, the HRC Committee and the Board’s compensation philosophy is that most compensation paid to executives should be “at-risk” (annual cash incentive bonus, PSUs, Options, and RSUs where appropriate) to more closely align those executives’ actions and decisions with the interests of the Company’s shareholders. In 2021, 79% of the CEO’s and 71% (on average) of the other NEOs’ total target compensation was received in “at risk” compensation.
Base Salary
Base salary is the principal fixed component of pay and is intended to compensate executive officers for fulfilling their duties, to reflect such executive officer’s responsibilities, tenure and prior experience and assist in the attraction and retention of key executives. Base salaries are the principal basis for establishing the targets for the annual, mid-term and long-term incentive plan awards discussed below.
| Executive | 2021 Base Salary ($) | 2020 Base Salary ($) | Percentage Change | |||||||||
| Scott Perry | 875,000 | 815,000 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||
| Darren Millman | 514,800 | 502,250 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins | 496,800 | 480,000 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 470,000 | 455,000 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 445,000 | 430,000 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||
Any salary change for the CEO is recommended annually by the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the HRC Committee, who conduct a formal assessment of the CEO’s performance in the year. The results of the formal assessment are then reviewed with the HRC Committee, and recommendations made to the Board who make the final determination for any salary increase for the CEO.
Any salary changes for the other NEOs, all of whom report directly to the CEO, are recommended by the CEO to the HRC Committee who makes the final determination of any salary increase. For 2022, none of the NEOs salaries have changed compared to 2021.
Short-Term Incentives — Annual Cash Bonus Incentives (Non-Equity)
Centerra’s annual cash bonus incentive plan is a short-term incentive plan designed to provide annual cash bonuses based upon the achievement of corporate and individual targets/objectives in the year. Awards are based on the Company’s results achieved during the year and the achievement of predetermined individual targets/objectives. The compensation decisions for NEOs are made using a comprehensive evaluation process that involves the CEO, the HRC Committee and other Board committees (as appropriate) and the Chair of the Board.
NEOs and other eligible employees may elect to take all or a portion of their annual cash bonus incentive in the form of employee restricted share units (“Employee RSUs”) which acts as a mid-term incentive plan. This feature reduces cash payments to executives, while also further aligning executive compensation with sustainable performance as NEOs forego annual cash for equity which vests over time with the ultimate value reflecting shareholders’ perceptions of performance over that period. For further information relating to Employee RSUs, see “Employee Restricted Share Units (in lieu of Annual Cash Bonus)” starting on page 26.
20
The 2021 target cash bonus incentive percentages for the NEOs are set out below:
| Executive | 2021 Base Salary ($) | Target (% of Base Salary)(1) | Target Amount ($) | |||||||||
| Scott Perry | 875,000 | 125 | 1,093,750 | |||||||||
| Darren Millman | 514,800 | 80 | 411,840 | |||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins | 496,800 | 80 | 397,440 | |||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 470,000 | 65 | 305,500 | |||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 445,000 | 65 | 289,250 | |||||||||
| (1) | In December 2020, following the annual review of executive compensation in collaboration with Willis Towers Watson, the HRC Committee approved an increase of 5% to the target cash bonuses for all Named Executive Officers, with the exception of the CEO. |
The annual cash bonus incentive target percentages are subject to multipliers based on corporate and individual performance during the year and, as such, actual awards may be above or below such targets. Both the corporate and individual performance components of the annual cash bonus incentive measures may range from 0% (if the threshold performance level is not achieved) to 150% (if the stretch performance level is exceeded). However, the maximum aggregate multiplier that can be applied to the annual cash bonus incentive target is capped at two times target, resulting in maximum annual cash bonus incentives of two times a NEO’s target bonus. If a NEO is promoted during the year and the bonus target changes, the bonus target is pro-rated for the purpose of determining the NEO’s annual cash bonus incentive payment at year end.
The formula set out below is used to determine actual cash bonus awards for participants, including the NEOs. Other than base salary, which is discussed above, each element of this formula is discussed below.
| Base Salary | X |
Target Cash Bonus (% of Base Salary, varies by NEO) |
X |
Corporate Performance (0.0-1.5) |
X |
Individual Performance (0.0-1.5) |
= |
Actual Cash Bonus (0.0-2.0) |
Corporate Performance
At the beginning of each year, the Board and management agree on financial, operational and strategic objectives for the year which are based upon a number of factors, including Centerra’s annual and long-term business strategy and its overall risk appetite. At the conclusion of each year, the HRC Committee assesses actual performance against these objectives. Centerra’s 2021 corporate performance measure was based upon the following performance categories for cash bonus incentive plan purposes:
| · | environmental, social and governance (health, safety and sustainability performance) (25%); |
| · | operating and financial performance (55%); and |
| · | growth and value creation (20%). |
If Centerra meets each of the targeted performance measures, the corporate performance multiplier is 1.0. If the stretch performance is achieved or exceeded for each of the corporate performance measures, the corporate performance multiplier is 1.5. If the minimum performance is not achieved for a particular corporate performance measure, no amount is payable for that measure.
In 2021, the HRC Committee performed a thorough review of the year’s performance which was one of the most challenging in the history of Centerra. In addition to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the organization faced unprecedented challenges from the illegal seizure of the Kumtor mine by the Kyrgyz Republic Government in May 2021. These events made the evaluation of 2021 corporate performance exceedingly difficult. The HRC Committee considered, with the advice of its independent compensation advisers, various alternative approaches to evaluate company performance, including different scenarios with recalibrated 2021 targets (including and excluding the Kumtor mine). While acknowledging that Centerra’s overall performance in 2021 was overshadowed by the significant loss of shareholder value resulting from the seizure of the Kumtor mine, the HRC Committee also considered that the corporate performance multiplier impacts the annual incentive of employees at all levels of the organization. As a result, a decision was made to recalibrate Centerra’s 2021 performance objectives to include the Kumtor mine results until the date of the seizure consistent with the treatment of the seizure in the 2021 annual financial statements and the Company’s corporate annual performance was assessed against these revised targets. The HRC Committee used its discretion to cap the corporate performance score to 1.0.
21
A summary of the 2021 results as well as a discussion of 2021 corporate performance is set out below.
Environmental, Social and Governance - The Company realized several significant safety milestones including those that were recognized for achieving numerous health and safety exposure hours without incurring any lost time injuries. However, Centerra experienced a total reportable injury frequency rate that was below the minimum targeted performance levels and hence a zero score was assigned. Centerra performed well against 2021 targets for environmental incidents and advanced its progress in social and governance initiatives. The Company’s year two requirements for the RGMP implementation were achieved, with RGMP self-assessments completed, a Company-wide roadmap to conformance signed off by the executive team and year two assurance completed. Significant progress was made in our DE&I journey with a global current state assessment completed, recommendations presented and the creation of global and regional strategies underway.
Operating and Financial Performance - The Company’s operational performance was as follows: (i) full year 2021 gold production of 447,971 ounces, which was higher than the maximum performance target of 441,406 ounces. Kumtor produced 139,830 ounces until May 2021, Mount Milligan produced 196,438 ounces of gold and Öksüt produced 111,703 ounces of gold; (ii) full year 2021 copper production of 73.3 million pounds, slightly below the targeted objective of 75.7 million pounds; (iii) adjusted all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounce sold, excluding revenue based taxes, of US$803, 1 which was lower than the maximum performance target of US$913; and (iv) operating cash flow of US$392 million during the year, which was above the maximum targeted Company-wide objective of US$390 million.
Growth and Value Creation - The Company was successful against its growth and value creation objectives in 2021 as it successfully refinanced its $400 million revolving line of credit and achieved maximum performance target. Mineral resource growth target was achieved at maximum performance target with the release of updated mineral reserve and mineral resources estimates for the Mount Milligan mine, the Öksüt mine and the Kemess property as of December 31, 2021. Unfortunately, Centerra was unable to achieve a net asset value proposal for the Kemess asset and hence did not meet this objective in 2021.
| 1 | All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis is a non-GAAP financial measure and all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounce sold is a non-GAAP ratio in accordance with NI 52-112. Management believes that the use of these measures assists analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the Company in understanding the costs associated with producing gold and copper, understanding the economics of gold and copper mining, assessing operating performance, the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and on an overall Company basis, and for planning and forecasting of future periods. However, the measures have limitations as analytical tools as they may be influenced by the point in the life cycle of a specific mine and the level of additional exploration or other expenditures a company has to make to fully develop its properties. These specified financial measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers, even as compared to other issuers who may be applying the World Gold Council guidelines. Accordingly, these specified financial measures should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for, analysis of the Company’s recognized measures presented in accordance with IFRS. For further information on all-in substantiating costs on a by-product basis per ounce, including a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure, see “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” of the Company’s Management, Discussion & Analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2022, which is incorporated by reference herein and a copy of which is available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar. |
22
2021 Corporate Objectives – Results

The quantitative approach above compares 2021 results against recalibrated targets that exclude the Kumtor mine from the date of seizure. Although this assessment resulted in a corporate performance multiplier of 109.84%, the HRC Committee did not consider that to be a reasonable outcome given the loss of shareholder value following the seizure of the Kumtor mine. Consequently, the HRC Committee applied discretion to cap the 2021 corporate performance multiplier at 1.00.
2021 Individual Performances
Annually, all executives, including the CEO, establish individual performance objectives for the ensuing year. These objectives are generally outside the scope of routine work responsibilities and are designed to reflect Centerra’s strategic objectives and overall risk appetite.
The CEO’s individual performance for the purpose of the annual incentive plan cash bonus is based upon performance against a predetermined set of objectives. This performance rating is based upon input from the Chair of the Board, the Chair of the HRC Committee, members of the HRC Committee and Chairs of other committees, as appropriate. This rating and the resultant incentive compensation amount are recommended by the HRC Committee to the Board for approval.
The CEO annually provides the Chair of the HRC Committee with individual performance assessments for each of the executives who directly report to him, including the other NEOs. The HRC Committee reviews the recommendations and approves the individual performance scores, with such changes as it considers necessary, for such direct reports of the CEO, taking into account the various factors noted below. Specifically, in assessing individual performance in the context of making executive compensation recommendations, the HRC Committee considers each executive officer’s:
| · | contributions to Centerra’s overall performance; |
| · | individual performance relative to pre-established goals; |
| · | long-term performance and potential for future advancement or ability to assume roles of greater responsibility; and |
| · | position against compensation paid to executives in similar roles in our peer group. |
23
In assessing each individual NEO’s performance, the HRC Committee and the Board considered the individual achievements of each NEO as compared to their individual objectives.
Mr. Perry’s individual performance in 2021 was evaluated based on, among other things, production and all-in sustaining costs across the operations during the COVID-19 pandemic, navigating the challenges arising from the seizure of the Kumtor mine, continuing to effectively manage employee engagement; implementing critical controls as a health and safety indicator and working to improve global safety performance, and continued talent development in his senior leadership team. Mr. Perry continued to develop strong relationships with investor groups through meetings and presentations. Mr. Perry was also responsible for the continued roll-out and expansion of Centerra’s DE&I initiatives and talent management and succession programs.
Mr. Millman’s individual performance in 2021 was evaluated based on, among other things, completing the successful listing of the Company on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), delivering a global IT system roadmap, enhancing the reach of the Company’s investor relations activities and developing succession planning and talent development plans for the Finance group.
Mr. Desjardins’ individual performance in 2021 was evaluated based on, among other things, ensuring operations continue uninterrupted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and leading the Company’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, receiving Mount Milligan’s water permit approvals, improving safety performance across all sites, and actively supporting DE&I initiatives.
Mr. Kwong’s individual performance in 2021 was evaluated based on, among other things, reviewing and advising on acquisition/divestment opportunities, rolling out critical control processes for exploration drilling across the Company, developing a pipeline of new greenfield exploration projects as well as advancing brownfield exploration programs to incrementally increase the Company’s mineral reserves and resources and actively supporting DE&I initiatives.
Mr. Rehman’s individual performance in 2021 was evaluated based on navigating the challenges arising from the seizure of the Kumtor mine, legal support on business development initiatives, establishing the NYSE dual listing, receiving Mount Milligan’s water permit approvals, and actively supporting DE&I initiatives.
Overall, the CEO and each NEO achieved and/or exceeded performance against their individual goals. However, for the reasons described above, the HRC Committee and the Board used discretion to limit the CEO’s individual performance assessment at 85% and for all other Named Executive Officers at 100%.
Overall Results of Annual Cash Bonus Incentive Awards
A summary of the 2021 annual cash bonus incentive awards for each NEO is set out in the table below:
| Executive | Target (% of Base | Target Amount ($) | Corporate Performance Multiplier (%) | Actual Individual Performance Multiplier (%)(1) | Actual Incentive Amount ($)(2) | Actual Incentive (% of Base | ||||||||||||||||||
| Scott Perry | 125 | % | 1,093,750 | 100 | 85 | 929,688 | 106 | |||||||||||||||||
| Darren Millman | 80 | % | 411,840 | 100 | 100 | 411,840 | 80 | |||||||||||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins | 80 | % | 397,440 | 100 | 100 | 397,440 | 80 | |||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 65 | % | 305,500 | 100 | 100 | 305,500 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 65 | % | 289,250 | 100 | 100 | 389,250 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | As described above, to align with shareholder interests, the HRCC used its discretion to cap the CEO’s individual performance multiplier at 85% and all other NEO individual performance multipliers at 100%. |
| (2) | As further described above and below, a portion of the Annual Incentive Award can be taken by NEOs as Employee RSUs. |
Mid-term and Long-term Incentives
Centerra’s mid-term and long-term incentive programs typically consist of annual grants of PSUs awarded under its Performance Share Unit Plan (“PSU Plan”) and Options awarded under its Share Option and Share Appreciation Rights Plan (“Option Plan”). The PSU Plan and the Option Plan are administered by the HRC Committee. PSUs are awarded by the HRC Committee, and Options are awarded by the Board upon the recommendation of the HRC Committee. Prior grants are not considered when considering new grants of PSUs and Options. The HRC Committee and the Board target the grant of mid-term and long-term incentives as a percentage of the participant’s base salary, with the percentage reflecting the level of responsibility of the participant and other factors. The form of the incentive award (whether PSUs, Options or other) for each executive is at the discretion of the Board, although the Company’s practice has been to divide the award value equally between PSUs and Options.
24
Performance Share Units
Centerra’s PSU Plan is a mid-term incentive plan that permits Centerra to grant PSUs to its employees and executive officers. The purpose of the PSU Plan is to align the interests of plan participants with Centerra’s performance in increasing shareholder value over the medium term, especially in comparison with other gold companies included in the S&P/TSX Global Gold CAD$ Index as measured through its Total Return Index Value (the “TRIV”). The PSU Plan provides a staggered vesting schedule over three years whereby 50% of the PSUs vest on December 31 of the year following the grant year (end of year 2), and the remaining 50% of the PSUs vest on December 31 of the subsequent year (end of year 3). At the time of vesting, the number of PSUs will be adjusted according to the Share price performance relative to the TRIV in accordance with the table below and calculated on a linear basis between the points in the table.
| Centerra Performance Relative to TRIV | PSU Vesting Adjustment | |
| Greater than 1.5 | 200% | |
| Between 1.0 and 1.5 | Linear calculation | |
| 1.0 | 100% | |
| Between 1.0 and 0.75 | Linear calculation | |
| Below 0.75 | 0% |
PSUs are automatically redeemed at the time of vesting for the cash equivalent of a Share based upon its fair market value (as defined in the PSU Plan) immediately prior to vesting of the PSUs or, at Centerra’s election, a Share purchased on the open market. PSUs cannot be redeemed by a participant unless they have vested in accordance with their terms. If dividends are paid on the Shares, additional PSUs are credited to participants’ accounts. The number of additional PSUs credited to participants’ accounts is determined by dividing the dollar amount of the dividends payable in respect of the PSUs allocated to the participant’s account by the fair market value of a Share calculated as of the dividend payment date.
Target percentages of PSUs issued to NEOs in 2021 are set out in the table below.
| Executive | 2021 PSU Target(1) (% of Base Salary) | |||
| Scott Perry | 125 | % | ||
| Darren Millman | 90 | % | ||
| Daniel Desjardins | 90 | % | ||
| Dennis Kwong | 80 | % | ||
| Yousef Rehman | 80 | % | ||
| (1) | The number of PSUs awarded is determined by dividing the target value of the grant by the five-day volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) as of the grant date. |
Share Options
The purpose of Centerra’s Option Plan is to link employee performance with successful, sustained long-term Company performance that increases shareholder value. The Option Plan is also designed to assist in the retention of key employees. The HRC Committee designates the recipients of Options and the terms and conditions of each grant and grants are approved by the Board. Options are granted at prices no lower than the VWAP, in Canadian dollars, of Centerra’s Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) for the five trading days prior to the date of the grant. The number of Options awarded is based upon a target percentage of a participant’s base salary and the Black-Scholes value of an Option. The target percentage varies depending upon the participants’ level of responsibility. The amount and terms of outstanding PSUs, Options and share appreciation rights, if any, are not taken into account when determining whether and how many new Option grants will be made.
Options granted under the Option Plan are non-transferable, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Options must be exercised no later than eight years after the date of the grant. Options vest as to one-third on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant. The Option Plan provides for the term of Options that would otherwise expire during a blackout period to be automatically extended to 10 business days following the end of a blackout period. All Options that expire or are forfeited unexercised are available for future issuances under the Option Plan.
A maximum of 18,000,000 Shares have been made available for issuance upon exercise of Options granted under the Option Plan, representing 6.07% of Centerra’s weighted average number of Shares outstanding for 2021. Under no circumstances may the Option Plan, together with all of Centerra’s other Share compensation arrangements, result in: (i) the number of securities issuable to insiders, at any time, exceeding 10% of the outstanding issue of Shares; (ii) the number of securities issued to insiders within any one-year period exceeding 5% of the outstanding issue of Shares; or (iii) the number of securities issued or issuable to any one person exceeding 5% of the outstanding issue of Shares.
25
The HRC Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Option Plan at any time, provided that no amendment, suspension or termination may materially adversely affect any Options or rights granted to a participant without the participant’s consent. In addition, the following amendments to the Option Plan, or to Options granted thereunder, require shareholder approval: (i) amendments to the number of Shares issuable under the Option Plan, including an increase to a fixed maximum number of Shares or a change from a fixed maximum number of Shares to a fixed maximum percentage; (ii) amendments that increase the length of the period after a blackout period during which Options or any rights pursuant thereto may be exercised; (iii) amendments that would reduce the exercise price of an Option or that would result in the exercise price for any Option being lower than the fair market value of a Share at the time the Option is granted, except a reduction in connection with any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of Shares, merger, consolidation, spin-off or other distribution, or other change in the capital of Centerra affecting Shares; (iv) any amendment expanding the categories of eligible person which would have the potential of broadening or increasing insider participation; (v) amendments to termination provisions providing an extension beyond the original expiry date, or a date beyond a permitted automatic extension in the case of an Option expiring during a blackout period; (vi) the addition of any other provision which results in participants receiving Shares while no cash consideration is received by Centerra; and (vii) amendments required to be approved by shareholders under applicable law (including, without limitation, the rules, regulations and policies of the TSX).
If a participant in the Option Plan dies, Options which have vested will be exercisable for a period of one year by the participant’s legal representatives. Options not vested will expire. Options may not be transferred or assigned other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. If a participant retires or becomes disabled, unvested Options will continue to vest and vested Options will continue to be exercisable in both cases for a period of three years from the date of retirement or disability, and all Options which are not exercised expire. If a participant ceases to be eligible under the Option Plan for any other reason, except due to a change in control of Centerra, each Option held by the participant which is unvested will be cancelled immediately and each Option that is vested as at the date the participant ceases to be eligible under the Option Plan may be exercised during the period commencing on such date the participant ceases to be eligible and ending 90 days thereafter, after which time all unexercised Options held by the participant will expire. In the event of a change of control, all Options will vest immediately, and the participant may exercise his or her Options for a period of 90 days (or such longer period set out in any employment contract) after the change of control following which unexercised Options will expire.
Target percentages for Options issued to NEOs in 2021 are set out in the table below.
| Executive | 2021 Option Target(1) (% of Base Salary) | |||
| Scott Perry | 125 | % | ||
| Darren Millman | 90 | % | ||
| Daniel Desjardins | 90 | % | ||
| Dennis Kwong | 80 | % | ||
| Yousef Rehman | 80 | % | ||
| (1) | The corresponding number of Options is determined by dividing the target value of the option grant by the product of the VWAP, in Canadian dollars, of Centerra’s Shares on the TSX for the five trading days immediately preceding the date of the grant and the Black-Scholes option value which an independent compensation consulting firm prepares for Centerra prior to each grant. |
Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan - Employee RSUs
Employee Restricted Share Units (in lieu of Annual Cash Bonus)
Under the Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan (“RSU Plan”), eligible employees, including all members of senior management may decide to take all or a portion of their annual cash bonus incentive in the form of Employee RSUs. This election can be made by the end of the first quarter of the calendar year in respect of which such cash bonus incentive payment relates. Employee RSUs have different attributes from Director RSUs and any grant by the Board of discretionary RSUs (“Discretionary RSUs”), but all are granted pursuant to the terms of the RSU Plan.
The number of Employee RSUs to be granted to each individual shall be determined by dividing (a) the value of the cash bonus incentive being taken as RSUs by (b) the market value (the VWAP of Centerra’s Shares on the TSX for the five trading days immediately prior to the grant date) of a Share as at the award date, rounded to the nearest whole of an Employee RSU. If a dividend is paid on the Shares, each participant will be allocated additional Employee RSUs equal in value to any dividend paid on the Shares multiplied by the number of Employee RSUs held by the participant, divided by the market value of the Shares on the date that the dividend is paid.
In accordance with the Company’s RSU Plan, for every two Employee RSUs granted to an eligible employee in lieu of a bonus-incentive, the Company will grant an additional Employee RSU to such eligible employee.
26
All Employee RSUs granted to eligible employees are subject to a two-year vesting period; 50% of the Employee RSUs granted vest upon the first anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining 50% vest on the second anniversary of grant date. Given the two-year vesting period, these Employee RSUs serve as a retention incentive for such executives and as an additional method of aligning executive compensation with the interests of shareholders. Upon redemption of an Employee RSU, Centerra shall issue from treasury one Share for each whole vested RSU being redeemed.
If an eligible employee’s employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries ceases as a result of death, disability, retirement, termination without just cause or circumstances constituting constructive dismissal, all Employee RSUs held by such participant shall vest immediately and can be redeemed by the eligible employee within one year from the termination date. If an eligible employee resigns from the Company or one of its subsidiaries or is terminated for just cause, all unvested Employee RSUs held by such participant shall automatically be terminated and vested Employee RSUs held by such participant may be redeemed within one year from such resignation or termination.
For further information regarding the number of Shares reserved for issuance under the RSU Plan and the administration of the RSU Plan, see “Director Compensation – Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan – Director RSUs” on page 38.
The following sets out the percentage of each NEO’s 2021 annual incentive payment (awarded in 2022) taken in the form of Employee RSUs:
| Executive | % of Annual Incentive taken in Employee RSUs | |||
| Scott Perry | 100 | % | ||
| Darren Millman | 50 | % | ||
| Daniel Desjardins | 100 | % | ||
| Dennis Kwong | 50 | % | ||
| Yousef Rehman | 100 | % | ||
Discretionary Restricted Share Units
The RSU Plan also permits discretionary grants of RSUs (Discretionary RSUs) to directors, executive officers and eligible employees on such terms and conditions as the Board may determine, provided that: (i) the aggregate annual value of any Discretionary RSUs granted to any non-employee director of the Company or any of its subsidiaries shall not exceed $150,000, and (ii) the number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Discretionary RSUs granted to non-employee directors of the Company or any of its subsidiaries may not exceed 1% of the outstanding Shares.
The number of Discretionary RSUs to be granted to each individual shall be determined by dividing (a) the amount of the remuneration to be credited in RSUs on the award date by (b) the fair market value (the VWAP of Centerra’s Shares on the TSX for the five trading days immediately prior to the grant date) of a Share as at the award date, rounded to the nearest whole of a Discretionary RSU. If a dividend is paid on the Shares, each participant will be allocated additional Discretionary RSUs equal in value to any dividend paid on the Shares multiplied by the number of Discretionary RSUs held by the participant, divided by the market value of the Shares. Other terms and conditions of the Discretionary RSUs, including a vesting schedule and redemption conditions, are to be determined by the Board.
For further information regarding the number of Shares reserved for issuance under the RSU Plan and the administration of the RSU Plan, see “Director Compensation – Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan – Director RSUs” on page 38.
Employee Share Purchase Plan
In 2017, Centerra established an Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) in which eligible employees, including NEOs, are entitled to participate by making contributions of up to 10% of their base salaries. The ESPP is intended to motivate eligible employees to acquire Shares in a convenient manner, to encourage employee Share ownership and to align employees’ interests with the interests of the shareholders. Unless otherwise determined by the HRC Committee, participation in the ESPP is open to full time and permanent part-time employees (who have completed three continuous months of employment) of the Company and any of its subsidiaries. Participation in the ESPP is voluntary.
To participate in the ESPP, an eligible employee authorizes payroll deductions in an amount between 1% and 10% of his or her eligible compensation to be contributed to the ESPP, provided that a participant may not purchase more than 15,000 Shares pursuant to the ESPP in any calendar year. Such contributions will be used to purchase Shares at the end of each quarterly contribution period.
Centerra contributes to a participant’s ESPP account an amount equal to 25% of such participant’s payroll contributions during a contribution period. On the last trading day of each contribution period, the participant’s contributions and the related employer contributions to the ESPP are used to purchase the maximum number of whole Shares that can be purchased either by way of market purchase or issuance from treasury. Where such purchases are satisfied by the Company through the issuance of Shares from treasury, the number of Shares will be determined by dividing the participant’s contribution plus the employer contribution by the five-day VWAP of the Shares on the TSX on the award date. No fractional Shares may be awarded. Cash dividends, if any, paid with respect to Shares held in the ESPP accounts will be automatically reinvested in Shares. To date, all Shares issued to participants under the ESPP have been issued from treasury.
27
The total number of Shares available for issuance under the ESPP is 5,000,000. Shares purchased under the ESPP may be issued from treasury or acquired on the open market. Under no circumstances may the ESPP, together with all of Centerra’s other security-based compensation arrangements, result in (a) the number of Shares issuable pursuant to the ESPP and/or other units or stock options to any one person exceeding 5% of the outstanding Shares; or (b) the number of Shares (i) issuable to insiders at any time or (ii) issued to insiders within any one-year period, exceeding 10% of the outstanding Shares.
Upon termination of employment for any reason, a participant is no longer an eligible employee under the ESPP and will be withdrawn from the ESPP. Upon withdrawal from the ESPP, all payroll deductions from the ESPP that have not been used to purchase Shares will be returned to the participant or his or her executor, administrator or designated beneficiary. No payroll deductions, contributions or any rights to receive Shares under the ESPP may be assigned or transferred other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
The ESPP is administered by the HRC Committee, subject to the HRC Committee reporting to the Board on all matters requiring approval of the Board. The HRC Committee has the authority, in the case of specified capital reorganizations affecting the Company, to determine appropriate equitable adjustments, if any, to be made under the ESPP, including adjustments to the number of Shares which have been authorized for issuance under the ESPP. The HRC Committee may make amendments to the ESPP without shareholder approval, except for the following amendments: (i) increasing the number of Shares reserved for issuance under the ESPP; (ii) removing or exceeding the insider participation limits; (iii) extending eligibility to participate in the ESPP to non-employees; (iv) reducing the purchase price payable for Shares under the ESPP; (v) increasing the employer contributions permitted under the ESPP; (vi) changing the amendment provisions of the ESPP; or (vii) other amendments that require shareholder approval under applicable law or stock exchange rules.
Other Benefits and Perquisites
Centerra provides competitive employee benefits and executive perquisites to aid in the attraction and retention of key executives. Centerra’s group benefits package includes life, health, dental, disability and accidental death and dismemberment coverage. Centerra’s NEOs are eligible for the same group benefits package as non-executive employees, except that NEOs participate in the SERP instead of the employee group retirement savings plan. The Company’s annual contributions to the SERP are twelve percent (12%) of eligible earnings, where eligible earnings are defined as the prior year’s base salary plus annual incentive, capped at the target incentive amount. Executives also receive a quarterly perquisite allowance ($10,000 for the CEO and $8,750 for all other NEOs) as well as an annual medical exam, paid for by Centerra.
Executive Share Ownership
The Board believes that executive officers, including the NEOs, should hold a significant ownership interest in Centerra in order to align their interests with those of Centerra’s shareholders, focus executives on improving total shareholder returns over time and mitigate compensation related risks. As a result, the Board has adopted a Share ownership policy setting forth Share ownership expectations applicable to executive officers.
The CEO is required to attain a level of Share ownership equivalent to 3 times basic annual salary. All other executive officers are required to attain a level of Share ownership equivalent to 1.5 times basic annual salary. Executive officers must fulfill their Share ownership requirement within five years of becoming subject to the executive Share ownership policy. A minimum of one-third of the required level of Share ownership must be met through the ownership of Shares. The balance of the required level of Share ownership can be achieved through PSUs held pursuant to Centerra’s PSU Plan, Employee RSUs or Discretionary RSUs held pursuant to Centerra’s RSU Plan, and any other equity plan as determined by the HRC Committee (currently, there are no additionally identified plans). Options are not included in the calculation of an executive’s Share ownership.
When calculating the value of executive Share ownership, Shares are valued at the higher of cost at acquisition (the “Acquisition Value” for Shares) and current fair market value (the “Market Value” of Shares), PSUs are valued based on the intended value at the time of grant, and Employee RSUs are valued based on the value of the annual incentive plan (bonus) directed by the executive to purchase RSUs plus the value of additional Employee RSUs issued by the Company as a Company match under the RSU Plan.
28
The table below sets out a summary of each NEO’s most recent Share ownership requirements and their most recent shareholdings as of July 15, 2022. All NEOs were, as of July 15, 2022, in compliance with their Share ownership requirements.
| Executive | Salary(1) | Target(1) | Type of Value | Common ($) | PSUs ($) | RSUs ($) | Total
Value of Holdings(3) ($) | Current Holdings as a Multiple of Base Salary(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Scott Perry | 875,000 | 2,625,000 | Acquisition Value | 592,223 | 2,777,611 | 2,497,031 | 866,865 | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 570,926 | 1,874,389 | 1,560,156 | 4,005,471 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Darren Millman | 514,800 | 772,200 | Acquisition Value | 242,646 | 1,187,879 | 1,325,215 | 2,755,740 | 5.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 193,589 | 802,210 | 1,125,766 | 2,121,565 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins(6) | 496,800 | 745,200 | Acquisition Value | 1,700,574 | 1,137,709 | 860,794 | 3,699,078 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 951,391 | 767,926 | 649,217 | 2,368,534 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 470,000 | 705,000 | Acquisition Value | 414,436 | 972,695 | 771,096 | 2,158,226 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 404,731 | 657,641 | 627,186 | 1,689,558 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 445,000 | 667,500 | Acquisition Value | 257,334 | 910,986 | 636,694 | 1,805,014 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 207,735 | 615,065 | 487,902 | 1,310,702 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Salary reflects 2022 base salaries (none of the NEOs received a salary increase in 2022). The target level in this table is based on each NEO’s 2022 salary. | |
| (2) | Pursuant to the requirements for executive Share ownership, a minimum of one-third of the Share ownership level must be met through the ownership of Shares. The relevant dollar figure that must be met through the ownership of Shares based on 2022 base salary is as follows: Mr. Perry $875,000; Mr. Millman $257,400; Mr. Desjardins $248,400; Mr. Kwong $235,000; and Mr. Rehman $222,500. In accordance with the executive Share ownership policy, the foregoing amounts must be achieved by January 1, 2026. | |
| (3) | This value is determined as follows: (i) Shares are valued at cost at acquisition (the Acquisition Value); (ii) PSUs are valued based on the intended value at the time of grant (valued at the five-day VWAP as of the grant date); and (iii) Employee RSUs are valued based on the value of the annual incentive plan (bonus) directed by the executive to purchase Employee RSUs plus the value of additional Employee RSUs issued by the Company as a Company match under the RSU Plan (valued at the five-day VWAP as of the grant date). | |
| (4) | This value is determined as follows: (i) Shares are valued at the market value, being the five-day VWAP of Shares as of July 15, 2022 being $7.76; (ii) PSUs are valued based on the intended value at the time of grant (valued at the five-day VWAP as of the grant date); and (iii) Employee RSUs are valued based on the value of the annual incentive plan (bonus) directed by the executive to purchase Employee RSUs plus the value of additional Employee RSUs issued by the Company as a Company match under the RSU Plan (valued at the five-day VWAP as of the grant date). | |
| (5) | Calculated at the higher of total acquisition value or market value of holdings divided by current base salary. | |
| (6) | Mr. Desjardins retired from the Company on May 4, 2022 and his holdings are as of such date. |
Succession Planning for Senior Management
Talent management and succession planning are critical to Centerra’s continued success and the Board has a formal process for annually reviewing succession planning for its executive officers, including the CEO. In July of each year, the HRC Committee undertakes an in-depth review of succession planning, including a report from the President and CEO on succession for his direct reports and certain other employees.
The succession plans are based on Centerra’s talent identification and assessment processes that identify candidates who have the skills, experience and leadership competencies needed for progression to senior management roles. This talent management process was rolled out throughout the organization resulting in a comprehensive review of the capability and potential of both current and emerging leaders. This process includes the creation of individual development plans for high potential employees, including potential successors to all senior management roles, regional leadership positions and other critical roles in the organization.
CEO succession is also discussed during the July meetings of the HRC Committee and the Board. At these meetings, the HRC Committee and Board discuss internal candidates with long-term potential to serve as Centerra’s President and CEO, and identify any candidates that could step into the role immediately, on a permanent or interim basis, in the event the President and CEO departs unexpectedly or an emergency situation occurs. In 2021, potential internal successors to the President and CEO were assessed independently by an international leadership development firm that completed a fulsome CEO assessment for each candidate. The results were shared and discussed with the HRC Committee and development areas were identified and included in detailed individual development plan for these individuals.
The entire Board is responsible for working with the HRC Committee to continually evaluate potential successors to the position of President and CEO in accordance with the succession plan.
29
Share Performance and Cost of Compensation
Share Performance
The following graph compares the cumulative shareholder return for $100 invested in Shares from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2021. Centerra’s executive compensation mix provides approximately half of total compensation through mid-term and long-term incentives that are directly tied to the Share price, either through PSUs, RSUs or Options. Therefore, executive compensation is highly sensitive to the performance of Share value. As a result, when our Shares out-perform Centerra’s comparators (measured via the S&P/TSX Global Gold Index — TRIV), the PSU Plan is expected to pay above target and most Options are expected to be “in-the-money”. Conversely, when the Shares under-perform Centerra’s comparators, the PSU Plan is not expected to pay out and most Options are not expected to be “in-the-money”. The closing price of the Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2021 was $9.75.

CEO Compensation Lookback Analysis
The following table compares the value of total direct compensation awarded to Mr. Perry to its realizable value as at December 31, 2021. The difference between the reported value of compensation awarded and realizable value is primarily attributed to changes in Share price.
| Realizable Compensation as at December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total
Direct Compensation (TDC) Awarded(1) | Performance Period | Dollar Value(2) | Difference
from reported TDC (%) | Total
Shareholder Return (%) | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | 3.992.188 | 1 year (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021) | $ | 1,804,688 | -55 | % | -34 | % | |||||||||
| 2020 | $ | 3,919,093 | 2 year (Jan 1, 2020 to Dec 31, 2021) | $ | 2,918,937 | -26 | % | -2 | % | |||||||||
| 2019 | $ | 3,816,640 | 3 years (Jan 1, 2019 to Dec 31, 2021) | $ | 8,272,494 | 117 | % | 73 | % | |||||||||
| 2018 | $ | 3,726,142 | 4 years (Jan 1, 2018 to Dec 31, 2021) | $ | 9,194,321 | 147 | % | 57 | % | |||||||||
| 2017 | $ | 3,114,218 | 5 years (Jan 1, 2017 to Dec 31, 2021) | $ | 5,502,070 | 77 | % | 61 | % | |||||||||
| (1) | Includes base salary, annual short-term incentive, grant date fair value of option-based awards, grant date fair value of share-based awards (including Company match disclosed in prior management information circulars). |
| (2) | Includes base salary received during the year, short-term incentive paid (including receipt of payments in RSUs and the 50% Company match in RSUs, where applicable), the value at vesting of share units (RSUs and PSUs), the realized gains from Options at exercise, the fair value of share units outstanding (RSUs and PSUs), and value of outstanding Options that are “in-the-money” (realizable). |
30
Compensation Paid to Named Executive Officers in 2021
Summary Compensation Table
The Summary Compensation Table set out below and the related footnotes present information about the compensation of Centerra’s “Named Executive Officers” (determined in accordance with applicable rules). Compensation awarded to, earned by, paid or payable to each NEO is payable in Canadian dollars.
Name and Principal Position | Year | (a) Salary(1) ($) | (b) Share- ($) | (c) ($) | (d) Non-equity ($) | (e) Pension value(5) ($) | (f) All
other ($) | (g) Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Scott Perry | 2021 | 875,000 | 1,093,750 | 1,093,750 | 929,688 | 216,563 | 614,916 | 4,823,667 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| President & Chief | 2020 | 815,000 | 1,018,750 | 1,018,750 | 1,066,593 | 220,050 | 705,436 | 4,844,579 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Officer | 2019 | 780,000 | 975,000 | 975,000 | 1,086,640 | 210,600 | 585,995 | 4,613,235 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Darren Millman | 2021 | 514,800 | 463,320 | 463,320 | 411,840 | 111,197 | 202,400 | 2,166,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vice President & | 2020 | 502,250 | 452,025 | 452,025 | 381, 121 | 105,473 | 180,135 | 2,073,029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer | 2019 | 490,000 | 441,000 | 441,000 | 416,173 | 102,900 | 142,263 | 2,033,336 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins(7) | 2021 | 496,800 | 447,120 | 447,120 | 397,440 | 107,309 | 277,672 | 2,173,461 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vice President & Chief | 2020 | 480,000 | 432,000 | 432,000 | 392,743 | 100,800 | 301,072 | 2,138,615 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Officer | 2019 | 392,497 | 176,624 | 176,624 | 215,818 | n/a | 0 | 961,563 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 2021 | 470,000 | 376,000 | 376,000 | 305,500 | 93,056 | 155,312 | 1,775,868 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vice President, Business | 2020 | 455,000 | 364,000 | 364,000 | 271,410 | 87,165 | 137,706 | 1,679,281 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development & Exploration | 2019 | 435,000 | 348,000 | 348,000 | 300,251 | 83,520 | 113,283 | 1,628,054 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 2021 | 445,000 | 356,000 | 356,000 | 289,250 | 88,110 | 217,977 | 1,752,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vice President, General | 2020 | 430,000 | 344,000 | 344,000 | 265,576 | 82,560 | 128,835 | 1,594,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Counsel & Corporate Secretary | 2019 | 400,000 | 320,000 | 320,000 | 291,290 | 76,800 | 108,398 | 1,516,488 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Amounts indicated represent actual base salary received in the applicable year. |
| (2) | Share-based units awarded are (i) PSUs which are valued based on the grant date fair market value of a Share — defined as the five-day “VWAP” for a particular period of time. This valuation methodology is used because Centerra believes the fair market value is a reasonable reflection of the intended value, given that holders of these awards are affected by Share price movement and dividends in a similar manner as shareholders are affected by such events. The values provided in this table for PSUs and Employee RSUs is the same as the accounting fair value treatment. |
| (3) | Option-based awards are valued at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which Centerra has chosen because it is one of the most common valuation methodologies for options. The value is determined by an external compensation consultant each year. These values are meant to reflect the value the Board intended to deliver rather than the potential accounting expense, and therefore the assumptions used in these two calculations may differ. For comparison purposes, the corresponding accounting fair values for the Option-based awards for 2021, 2020 and 2019 respectively, were as follows: Scott Perry $805,795, $637,313 and $565,640; Darren Millman $341,339, $282,777 and $255,842; Daniel Desjardins $329,405, $270,250 and $105,138; Dennis Kwong $277,009, $227,710 and $201,890; and Yousef Rehman $262,274, $215,199 and $185,645. |
| (4) | Amounts indicated represent annual incentive bonus earned in the year but paid in the following year. The amounts indicated include any portion of annual incentive bonuses that were taken by individual NEOs in the form of Employee RSUs (which are subject to a two-year vesting period). This amount does not include the dollar value of Employee RSUs matched by the Company which is included in column (f) as more fully described in note (6) below. The Company does not have any non-equity incentive plans related to a period longer than one year except for the PSU Plan which are reflected in column (b) but for greater certainty, the vesting of PSUs does not result in the issuance of treasury Shares. |
| (5) | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) contributions are earned in one year and contributed in the following year. Amounts in the table reflect the annual SERP contributions earned by each NEO in the relevant year. |
| (6) | Amounts represent: (i) the aggregate amount of perquisites received in the year; (ii) the dollar value of any additional PSUs & RSUs granted in the year as a result of a dividend distribution (which are not included in column (b)); and (iii) the dollar value of Employee RSUs matched by the Company to NEOs who elected to receive all or a portion of their annual incentive payment in Employee RSUs (see further details below). These RSUs are in respect of the annual incentive bonus earned in the year but paid in the following year (similar to amounts reflected in column (d)). This figure does not include group benefits which are generally available to all employees of the Company. The dollar amounts for the Employee RSUs contributed (matched) by the Company to the NEOs under the RSU Plan are as follows: Scott Perry: $464,844 (2021), $533,296 (2020), and $543,320 (2019); Darren Millman: $102,960 (2021), $95,280 (2020), and $104,043 (2019); Daniel Desjardins: $198,720 (2021), $196,371 (2020), and $0 (2019); Dennis Kwong: $76,375 (2021), $67,852 (2020), and $75,063 (2019); and Yousef Rehman: $144,625 (2021), $72,823 (2020), and $62,843 (2019). All Employee RSUs are subject to a two-year vesting period – 50% vest on the first anniversary date of grant, and the remaining 50% vest on the second anniversary date. |
| (7) | As Mr. Desjardins was paid in US dollars prior to his promotion to Vice President & Chief Operating Officer on January 1, 2020, all dollar amounts indicated for Mr. Desjardins prior to 2020 have been converted from USD to CAD using the average exchange rate from the Bank of Canada for the applicable year, in this case 1.3269 for amounts received in 2019. |
31
Incentive Plan Awards
Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards
The following table sets out all incentive plan awards for each NEO outstanding as at December 31, 2021.
| Option-based Awards | Share-based Awards(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number
of (#) | Option exercise price ($) | Option expiration date(2) | Value
of unexercised in-the- money options(3) ($) | Number of (#) | Market or ($) | Market
or ($) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Scott Perry | 93,649 | 6.71 | March 6, 2027 | 284,693 | 325,131 | 2,157,729 | 1,233,787 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 155,316 | 12.52 | May 12, 2028 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 192,774 | 12.22 | March 5, 2029 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Darren Millman | 52,995 | 6.77 | March 6, 2026 | 157,925 | 91,000 | 452,714 | 1,042,998 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 110,274 | 6.71 | March 6, 2027 | 335,233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68,914 | 12.52 | May 12, 2028 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 81,660 | 12.22 | March 5, 2029 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins | 45,572 | 6.05 | March 3, 2023 | 168,616 | 100,841 | 565,041 | 725,059 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 49,824 | 7.32 | March 7, 2024 | 121,072 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56,194 | 6.77 | March 6, 2026 | 167,458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52,221 | 6.71 | March 6, 2027 | 158,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 65,861 | 12.52 | May 12, 2028 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 78,805 | 12.22 | March 5, 2029 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 109,197 | 5.04 | March 3, 2022 | 514,318 | 70,437 | 334,918 | 768,718 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 101,468 | 6.05 | March 3, 2023 | 375,432 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 98,098 | 7.32 | March 7, 2024 | 238,378 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 111,071 | 6.77 | March 6, 2026 | 330,992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 100,276 | 6.71 | March 6, 2027 | 304,839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 55,494 | 12.52 | May 12, 2028 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 66,270 | 12.22 | March 5, 2029 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 31,606 | 6.77 | March 6, 2026 | 94,186 | 67,194 | 322,188 | 698,325 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 71,419 | 6.71 | March 6, 2027 | 217,114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52,445 | 12.52 | May 12, 2028 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 62,745 | 12.22 | March 5, 2029 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | For each NEO, the figure for Share-based awards includes PSUs and Employee RSUs, including any additional PSUs & RSUs granted as a result of dividend distributions. |
| (2) | In accordance with the terms of the Option Plan, Options which expire during or within ten (10) days immediately following a trading blackout period, shall expire on the later of its expiration date and ten (10) days immediately following the expiration of the blackout period. |
| (3) | The amount in this column is the difference between the closing price on the TSX of the Shares underlying Options on December 31, 2021, which was $9.75, and the exercise price of the Options multiplied by the number of Options (whether or not such Options are vested as of the date of this Circular). |
| (4) | The market value of PSUs is based upon the market price of the Shares (calculated to be the five-day VWAP in Canadian dollars, of the Shares on the TSX) and an adjustment factor determined based on Share performance (for the applicable performance period) relative to the S&P/TSX Global Gold CAD$ TRIV Index as at December 31, 2021 (being the last trading day of 2021). The market value of Employee RSUs that have not vested is based on the closing price of the Shares on December 31, 2021, which was $9.75. |
| (5) | These amounts relate to (A) PSUs which vested on December 31, 2021, and (in accordance with the applicable plan text) are calculated using the 5-day VWAP, in Canadian dollars, of the Shares on the TSX, being $9.69 and Centerra’s Share performance relative to the S&P/TSX Global Gold CAD$ TRIV as of the vesting date of December 31, 2021; and (B) all Employee RSUs which have vested on or prior to December 31, 2021, which have not been redeemed by participants and which have been valued using the closing value of the Shares on December 31, 2021 ($9.75) As noted elsewhere in this Circular, Employee RSUs can only be redeemed by eligible employees for Centerra Shares. Pursuant to the RSU Plan, such participants can redeem vested Employee RSUs at any time for Shares up until one year following their termination date with Centerra. No RSUs were redeemed in 2021 by Messrs. Millman, Desjardins, Kwong or Rehman. Mr. Perry redeemed all the outstanding vested units of his 2019 and 2020 grants. |
32
Value Vested or Earned During the Year
The following table sets out incentive plan awards which have vested or been earned during the year ended December 31, 2021.
| Executive | Option-based awards — ($) | Share-based awards — ($) | Non-equity incentive plan ($) | |||||||||
| Scott Perry | 1,138,614 | 3,567,309 | 929,688 | |||||||||
| Darren Millman | 502,796 | 1,042,998 | 411,840 | |||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins | 206,314 | 725,059 | 397,440 | |||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 402,156 | 768,718 | 305,500 | |||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 355,947 | 698,325 | 289,250 | |||||||||
| (1) | Represents the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized in 2021 if Options had been exercised on the applicable vesting date. The value was determined by calculating the difference between the closing price on the TSX, in Canadian dollars, of the Shares underlying the Options on the vesting date and the exercise price of the Options multiplied by the number of Options vested. |
| (2) | These amounts relate to (A) PSUs which vested on December 31, 2021 and (in accordance with the applicable plan text) are calculated using the five-day VWAP, in Canadian dollars, of the Shares on the TSX, being $9.69 and Centerra’s Share performance relative to the S&P/TSX Global Gold CAD$ TRIV as of the vesting date of December 31, 2021; and (B) Employee RSUs (including units received as a result of a dividend payment) which vested during 2021, which have been valued using the market value of the Shares on the applicable vesting dates – February 10, 2021 - $14.20, March 12, 2021 - $12.49, March 15, 2021 - $12.77, April 6, 2021 - $11.58, June 10, 2021 – 10.09, September 8, 2021 - $9.02, December 3, 2021 - $9.09. As March 13, 2021 was not a trading day, market value is as of Friday March 12, 2021, being the most recent trading day prior to the vesting date. See footnote (3) for further breakdown of the Employee RSUs. As noted elsewhere in this Circular, Employee RSUs can only be redeemed by eligible employees for Shares. |
| (3) | Mr. Perry had 184,176 RSUs vest during 2021, and subsequently redeemed all vested RSUs in 2021; Mr. Millman had 39,020 RSUs vest in 2021; Mr. Desjardins had 34,883 RSUs vest in 2021; Mr. Kwong had 26,216 RSUs vest in 2021; Mr. Rehman had 23,215 RSUs vest in 2021. Pursuant to the RSU Plan, such participants can redeem vested Employee RSUs at any time for Shares up until one year following their termination date with Centerra. |
Value of Options Exercised During the Year
| Executive(1) | Grant Year | #
of Options Exercised | Gain
on options ($) | |||||||
| Scott Perry | 2018 2019 | 105,822 93,649 | 571,778 522,236 | |||||||
| Darren Millman | 2018 2019 | 76,050 16,800 | 450,074 100,058 | |||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 2013 | 70,426 | 395,919 | |||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 2017 2018 2019 | 811 20,000 20,789 | 4,006 114,600 120,368 | |||||||
| (1) | Mr. Desjardins did not exercise any Options in 2021. |
| (2) | Represents the gross dollar value (rounded down to nearest whole dollar) that was realized on the Option exercises per grant on the exercise date by calculating the difference between the Share price on date of exercise and the exercise price on the date of the grant (exercise price calculated by using the five-day VWAP, in Canadian dollars, of the Shares on the TSX, immediately preceding the grant date). |
Supplementary Executive Retirement Plan
The following table sets out the accumulated value of each NEO’s SERP at the beginning of 2021, the contributions made with respect to 2021 earnings (but paid in 2022) and the accumulated value as of December 31, 2021. Annual contributions to the SERP are twelve percent (12%) of eligible earnings, where eligible earnings are defined as the prior year’s base salary paid plus annual bonus incentive, capped at the target incentive value.
| Executive | Accumulated Value at ($) | Contribution Earned in Respect ($) | Accumulated Value at End of 2021(1) ($) | |||||||||
| Scott Perry | 982,050 | 216,563 | 1,198,613 | |||||||||
| Darren Millman | 440,978 | 111,197 | 552,175 | |||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins | 100,800 | 107,309 | 208,109 | |||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 764,513 | 93,056 | 857,569 | |||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 226,560 | 88,110 | 314,670 | |||||||||
| (1) | Since these are self-administered RCA Trusts, investment income is not included in these amounts. |
| (2) | Contributions made in respect of 2021 were based on eligible earnings in 2021 and paid in 2022. |
33
Termination and Change of Control Benefits
The following is a description of the incremental termination and change of control benefits provided to each of the NEOs pursuant to the terms of the Company’s incentive plans and their respective employment agreements with the Company. The Company’s plans and the employment agreements have a “double trigger” meaning that the benefits set out below are only triggered if both of the following events occur: (i) a change of control; and (ii) a termination without cause or a resignation for “good reason” following a change of control. A change of control itself will not trigger any of the benefits set out below.
“Just Cause”, “Good Reason”, and “Change of Control” are defined in an NEO’s employment agreement. Resignation for “good reason” is defined in the NEO employment agreements to mean (i) a material downward change in the NEO’s responsibilities or principal position; (ii) a 5% or more reduction in the NEO’s base salary or total compensation (except if reduction is related to failure to meet performance targets); (iii) a required relocation anywhere other than the metropolitan area of the NEO’s current office location; or (iv) failure to continue any material benefit available under the Company’s executive benefit program or the SERP, except to the extent that the benefits are discontinued because they can no longer be obtained by the Company at a reasonable cost.
| Type of Termination |
Severance | Annual Incentive Plan (Bonus) |
Options | PSUs | Employee RSUs |
Benefits | SERP | |||||||
| Termination without Just Cause or Good Reason(1) | Lump sum equal to base salary and target annual incentive for 24 months. | Bonus for the current year is prorated to the termination date (based on corporate performance assumed at target, if it cannot be determined, and based on personal performance at not less than meets expectation). | All options that would have vested during the 24 months following the termination date immediately vest as of the termination date and remain exercisable for a period of 90 days. | PSUs are pro-rated(2) to, and paid on, the termination date(2), and are subject to an adjustment factor equal to the adjustment factor at the termination date or 1.0, whichever is lower. | All RSUs vest immediately on the termination date. |
Benefits continue for a 24-month period following termination.
If benefits cannot be provided, the NEO receives a payment in lieu of benefits. |
Contributions continue for a 24-month period following termination. | |||||||
| Termination without Just Cause or Good Reason within 24 months of a Change of Control(1) | Lump sum equal to base salary and target annual incentive for 24 months. | Bonus for the current year is prorated to the termination date (based on corporate performance assumed at target, if it cannot be determined, and based on personal performance at not less than meets expectation). |
All options immediately vest and remain exercisable for a period of 90 days.
If options cannot vest or become exercisable during such 90-day period, the payment of a lump sum equal to the “in-the-money” value of the options is provided. |
All PSUs held as of the termination date vest immediately and are paid based on actual performance (as defined in the PSU plan) at the time of the change of control or the termination date (whichever is higher). | All RSUs vest immediately on the termination date. |
Benefits continue for the 24-month period following termination.
If benefits cannot be provided, the NEO receives a payment in lieu of benefits. |
Contributions continue for the 24-month period following termination. |
| (1) | “Just Cause”, “Good Reason”, and “Change of Control” are defined in an NEO’s employment agreement. |
| (2) | Prorated PSUs means a percentage of outstanding PSUs based on the period from the grant date to the termination date relative to the entire vesting period. For example, if an NEO was terminated without cause 18 months after grant of PSUs, the entitlement would be to (i) for the first vesting period of 24 months, 18/24 of the PSUs that would vest during such vesting period; and (ii) for the second vesting period of 36 months, 18/36 of the PSUs that would vest during such vesting period. For a further discussion on the vesting periods of PSUs, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Performance Share Unit Plan” on page 25. |
34
Each NEO has agreed that, except with advance written consent from Centerra, they will not compete with Centerra for a period of six months (12 months in the case of Mr. Perry) following the cessation of employment or solicit Centerra’s employees or full-time consultants for a period of two years following the cessation of employment. Each NEO has further agreed not to disclose any confidential information after the cessation of employment, to waive all moral rights to any intellectual property in favour of Centerra and that all right, title and interest in any intellectual property and copyright is for the exclusive use of Centerra.
The tables below provide details on the estimated incremental payments, payables and benefits by Centerra to each NEO that would have resulted had the relevant triggering event occurred on December 31, 2021. For equity-based compensation, the values represent the “in-the-money” value of any awards that vest or will become vested as a result of the termination circumstance. The values are based on a Share price of $9.75, being the closing price of the Shares on December 31, 2021.
Termination of Employment Without Cause or Good Reason
| Executive | Severance(1) ($) | Annual ($) | Options(3) ($) | PSUs(4) ($) | Employee ($) | Benefits ($) | SERP ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||
| Scott Perry | 3,937,500 | 0 | 284,693 | 0 | 1,935,833 | 116,191 | 472,500 | 6,746,717 | ||||||||||||||||
| Darren Millman | 1,853,280 | 0 | 128,768 | 0 | 354,257 | 106,191 | 222,394 | 2,664,889 | ||||||||||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins(6) | 1,788,480 | 0 | 52,917 | 0 | 470,945 | 91,884 | 214,618 | 2,618,843 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 1,551,000 | 0 | 101,615 | 0 | 344,165 | 105,353 | 186,120 | 2,288,253 | ||||||||||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 1,468,500 | 0 | 93,437 | 0 | 247,260 | 104,655 | 176,220 | 2,090,073 |
| (1) | Severance includes salary and annual incentive plan bonus at target for the severance period (24 months). |
| (2) | In the case of “Termination without Just Cause or Good Reason” which occurs on December 31, 2021, a NEO would not receive more than the annual incentive plan bonus for all of 2021, which would be calculated based on corporate performance and the individual performance being no less than “meets expectations”. Accordingly, there would be no incremental benefit to a NEO. |
| (3) | Reflects only Options which would otherwise vest in the 24 months following a termination on December 31, 2021 that are in the money. |
| (4) | In the case of a “Termination without Just Cause or Good Reason” which occurs on December 31, 2021, a NEO would not receive more than the PSU payment they would have otherwise received for any PSUs which vested at the end of 2021 which is calculated based on an adjustment factor equal to the adjustment factor at December 31, 2021 (the termination date) or 1.0, whichever is lower. Accordingly, there would be no incremental benefit to a NEO. |
| (5) | In the case of a “Termination without Just Cause or Good Reason”, all unvested Employee RSUs held by the NEO on the NEO’s termination date shall immediately vest. |
| (6) | Mr. Desjardins retired from the Company on May 4, 2022. |
Termination without Cause or Good Reason Following a Change of Control
| Executive | Severance(1) ($) | Annual ($) | Options(3) ($) | PSUs(4) ($) | Employee ($) | Benefits ($) | SERP ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||
| Scott Perry | 3,937,500 | 0 | 284,693 | 221,896 | 1,935,833 | 116,191 | 472,500 | 6,968,612 | ||||||||||||||||
| Darren Millman | 1,853,280 | 0 | 128,768 | 98,457 | 354,257 | 106,191 | 222,394 | 2,763,346 | ||||||||||||||||
| Daniel Desjardins(6) | 1,788,480 | 0 | 52,917 | 94,096 | 470,945 | 91,884 | 214,618 | 2,712,939 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Kwong | 1,551,000 | 0 | 101,615 | 79,283 | 344,165 | 105,353 | 186,120 | 2,367,537 | ||||||||||||||||
| Yousef Rehman | 1,468,500 | 0 | 93,437 | 74,928 | 247,260 | 104,655 | 176,220 | 2,165,001 |
| (1) | Severance includes salary and annual incentive plan bonus at target for the severance period (24 months). |
| (2) | In the case of “Termination without Just Cause or Good Reason within 24 months of a Change of Control” which occurs on December 31, 2021, a NEO would not receive more than the annual incentive plan bonus for all of 2021, which would be calculated based on corporate performance and the individual performance being no less than “meets expectations”. Accordingly, there would be no incremental benefit to a NEO. |
| (3) | Reflects only those unvested Options, which would accelerate in these circumstances that are in the money. |
| (4) | In the case of “Termination without Just Cause or for a Good Reason within 24 months of a Change of Control”, all unvested PSUs vest based on actual performance as of December 31, 2021. |
| (5) | In the case of a “Termination without Just Cause or Good Reason, within 24 months of a Change of Control”, all unvested Employee RSUs held by the NEO on the NEO’s termination date shall immediately vest. |
| (6) | Mr. Desjardins retired from the Company on May 4, 2022 |
35
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth, as at December 31, 2021, details of the Company’s compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.
Number of securities be issued upon of outstanding (a) | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, (b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding (c) | ||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders | ||||||||||||
| Stock Option Plan | 3,223,475 | $ | 9.23 | 7,694,120 | ||||||||
| Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan(1) | 939,676 | $ | 0 | 1,422,343 | ||||||||
| Employee Share Purchase Plan(2) | 31,997 | $ | 0 | 4,395,656 | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders | - | - | ||||||||||
| Total | 4,195,148 | N/A | 13,512,119 | |||||||||
| (1) | Information provided here includes Director RSUs (189,665), Employee RSUs (684,740) and Discretionary RSUs (65,271). As noted elsewhere, Employee RSUs must be redeemed as Shares issued from treasury. Director RSUs can be redeemed for cash or Shares issued from treasury, at the election of the director. All currently awarded Discretionary RSUs can only be redeemed for Shares issued from treasury. However, any future Discretionary RSUs may have different terms and conditions. |
| (2) | This represents the number of Shares actually issued under the ESPP in early Q1 2022, for aggregate cash proceeds that were in participants’ account as of December 31, 2021. Under the ESPP, Shares are issued to participants on a quarterly basis, as soon as administratively possible after such quarter end and based on the five-day VWAP on such purchase date, which was $9.77. |
The following tables sets forth additional information regarding Centerra’s security-based compensation arrangements.
| Plan | Burn Rate(1) | ||||
| Stock Option Plan | |||||
| 2019 | 0.45 | % | |||
| 2020 | 0.25 | % | |||
| 2021 | 0.30 | % | |||
| Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan | |||||
| 2019 | 0.17 | % | |||
| 2020 | 0.08 | % | |||
| 2021 | 0.11 | % | |||
| Employee Share Purchase Plan | |||||
| 2019 | 0.06 | % | |||
| 2020 | 0.04 | % | |||
| 2021 | 0.05 | % | |||
| (1) | Calculated by dividing (a) the number of securities granted under the arrangement during the applicable fiscal year by (b) the weighted average number of Shares outstanding for the applicable fiscal year. |
| Plan | Plan Maximum(1) | Outstanding Securities Awarded(2) | Remaining Securities Available for Grant(3) | |||
| Stock Option Plan | 18,000,000 (6.07%) | 3,223,475 (1.09%) | 7,694,120 (2.59%) | |||
| Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan | 4,000,000 (1.35%) | 939,676 (0.32%) | 1,422,343 (0.48%) | |||
| Employee Share Purchase Plan | 5,000,000 (1.69%) | 569,874 (0.19%) | 4,395,656 (1.48%) |
| (1) | The maximum number of securities issuable under each arrangement expressed as a fixed number (together with the percentage this number represents relative to the weighted average number of issued and outstanding Shares for 2021). |
| (2) | The number of outstanding securities awarded under each arrangement as of December 31, 2021 (together with the percentage this number represents relative to the weighted average number of issued and outstanding Shares for 2021). |
| (3) | The number of securities under each arrangement that are available for grant (together with the percentage this number represents relative to the weighted average number of issued and outstanding Shares for 2021). |
36
Director Compensation
Only directors who are not employees of Centerra are paid for serving as directors of Centerra. Every two years, the HRC Committee, with the advice of an independent compensation consultant, reviews the compensation paid to Centerra’s Board members in order to ensure that it is in line with its comparator group companies. The most recent director compensation review was carried out in 2021 and no adjustments were made. Accordingly, the next review will be carried out in 2023. Director compensation is currently comprised of the following components:
| (a) | an annual retainer of $175,500 (other than the Chair and Vice Chair), a portion of which (currently, a minimum of $115,000) must be taken as equity-based compensation in the form of DSUs and/or Director RSUs; |
| (b) | fees for serving as a chair of a Board committee — $25,000 for serving as chair of the Audit Committee, $20,000 for serving as Chair of the HRC Committee, $10,000 for serving as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and $15,000 for serving as chair of any other committee (other than the Special Committee); |
| (c) | attendance fee of $1,500 for each Board or regular committee meeting that they attend; |
| (d) | members of the Special Committee receive compensation of $1,500 per meeting. The chair of the Special Committee is the Vice Chair and does not receive any additional annual retainer for acting in this capacity; and |
| (e) | for directors not resident where the Board meeting is physically occurring, a travel allowance of $1,500 per trip within North America, and $4,500 in the case of travel outside North America is provided. |
The Chair receives an annual retainer of $310,000, of which at least $200,000 must be taken in the form of DSUs and/or Director RSUs. The Vice Chair receives an annual retainer of $280,000, of which at least $180,000 must be taken in the form of DSUs and/or Director RSUs.
In addition, directors also receive a per diem amount of $1,500 for international travel made at the request of the Chair or the President and CEO of Centerra. This does not apply for regularly scheduled Board meetings.
Mr. Perry, the President and CEO of Centerra, does not receive any compensation for his services as director.
None of the directors receive any non-equity incentive plan compensation or any pension related compensation.
The table below sets out compensation earned by directors in 2021.
| Fees Earned in 2021(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name(2) | Cash Portion of Fees Earned(3) ($) | Percent of Total Fees Earned (%) | Share-based ($) | Percent of Total Fees Earned (%) | Share-based ($) | Percent of Total Fees Earned (%) | All
Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tengiz Bolturuk | 4,500 | 9 | % | 2,633 | 5 | % | 41,243 | 85 | % | - | 48,375 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard Connor | 148,000 | 56 | % | - | - | 115,500 | 44 | % | - | 263,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dushenaly Kasenov | 81,000 | 41 | % | - | - | 115,500 | 59 | % | - | 196,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maksat Kobonbaev | 38,240 | 48 | % | - | - | 41,849 | 52 | % | - | 80,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nurlan Kyshtobaev | 47,384 | 32 | % | - | - | 102,763 | 68 | % | - | 150,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michael Parrett | 150,500 | 43 | % | - | - | 200,000 | 57 | % | - | 350,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jacques Perron | 118,500 | 51 | % | - | - | 115,500 | 49 | % | - | 234,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sheryl Pressler | 128,500 | 53 | % | - | - | 115,500 | 47 | % | - | 244,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bruce Walter | 57,000 | 17 | % | 280,000 | 83 | % | - | - | - | 337,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul Wright | 96,000 | 44 | % | 72,000 | 33 | % | 48,000 | 22 | % | - | 216,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Susan Yurkovich | 77,000 | 30 | % | 175,500 | 70 | % | - | - | - | 252,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Percentages in this table may not add to 100% due to rounding. Figures represent the amounts earned during 2021 – a portion of the compensation (earned in respect of the fourth quarter of 2021) was not paid to directors until early 2022. |
| (2) | This reflects all directors in 2021. Mr. Kyshtobaev joined the Board May 11, 2021. Messrs. Bolturuk and Kobonbaev were directors in 2021 until May 16, 2021 and May 11, 2021, respectively. Messrs. Kasenov and Kyshtobaev resigned from the Board effective July 29, 2022. |
| (3) | The cash portion of the fees earned includes the cash portion of a director’s retainer, meeting fees and fees for acting as a chair (where applicable). |
| (4) | This figure includes the intended value of DSUs or Director RSUs awarded as a result of fees earned during 2021. The number of DSUs or Director RSUs actually awarded in respect of the fees earned during 2021 is equal to the dollar amount of fees earned divided by the VWAP of Centerra’s Shares on the TSX for the five trading days immediately preceding the date of the award. In the case of Director RSUs and DSUs which were earned and subsequently vested and redeemed in 2021, the value above reflects the intended value of the Director RSU and DSU grants and not the actual amount paid out upon redemption, which amounts can be found in the table “Directors Incentive Plan Awards (Value Vested During 2021)”. |
37
Deferred Share Unit Plan
Centerra has established a Deferred Share Unit Plan (the “DSU Plan”) for non-executive directors to receive a portion of their director’s compensation as DSUs. As DSUs are received as compensation for services in lieu of cash remuneration, they represent an investment by directors in Centerra similar to Share ownership. Directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their director’s compensation (as specified by the Board from time to time) as equity-based compensation in the form of DSUs, Director RSUs, or a combination of both and such units are granted using the five-day VWAP of the Shares as at the time of the grant. Centerra believes that this plan aligns the interest of these directors with those of the shareholders. Directors who are officers of Centerra or Centerra subsidiaries do not receive DSUs (or Director RSUs) for serving as directors.
While serving as a director, DSUs cannot be redeemed. DSUs are redeemed in full by the director no later than December 15 in the calendar year that immediately follows the calendar year of termination of Board service. DSUs of directors who are United States citizens or resident aliens in the United States are redeemed in full on the 30th day following separation from service. In all cases, each DSU represents the right of the director to receive, after termination of all positions with Centerra, the market value of the DSUs equal to the weighted average of the closing price of Centerra’s Shares on the TSX for the five trading days immediately preceding the payout date. If a dividend is paid on the Shares, each director will be allocated additional DSUs equal in value to the dividend multiplied by the number of DSUs held by the director.
Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan – Director RSUs
Director RSUs
The RSU Plan is part of Centerra’s compensation arrangements available for directors, officers and eligible employees of Centerra and its subsidiaries and is intended to encourage directors, and eligible employees to participate in the long-term success of the Company and to align their interests with the interests of shareholders.
From time to time, the Board will specify the proportion of a director’s remuneration that is required to be taken in equity-based compensation in the form of Director RSUs under the RSU Plan, DSUs under the existing DSU Plan (described above), or a combination of both. Under the RSU Plan (and the DSU Plan), directors shall elect the percentage of their remuneration to be received in the form of Director RSUs or DSUs once each calendar year but prior to December 31 in the calendar year preceding the calendar year to which the election will apply. U.S. directors must also elect the redemption date for their Director RSUs at such time. All Director RSUs awarded to directors’ vest immediately and will expire one year following the eligible participant’s termination date. Non-US directors can elect to redeem their Director RSUs at any time after grant.
The number of Director RSUs to be granted to each individual shall be determined by dividing (a) the intended value of the director remuneration by (b) the market value (the VWAP of Centerra’s Shares on the TSX for the five trading days immediately prior to the grant day) of a Share as at the grant date, rounded to the nearest whole of a Director RSU. If a dividend is paid on the Shares, each participant will be allocated additional Director RSUs equal in value to any dividend paid on the Shares multiplied by the number of Director RSUs held by the participant, divided by the market value of the Shares.
Upon redemption, Centerra shall: (A) issue from treasury one Share for each whole vested Director RSU being redeemed; or (B) at the election of the participant, pay to the participant an amount equal to: (i) the number of vested Director RSUs being redeemed multiplied by (ii) the market value of a Share as at the redemption date minus (iii) applicable withholding taxes; or (C) a combination of (A) and (B), at the election of the participant.
If a director participant in the RSU Plan ceases to be a director of Centerra (and has no continuing employment relationship with Centerra), that individual will have a period of one year following his or her termination date to redeem Director RSUs.
Administration of the RSU Plan
Under the RSU Plan, a maximum of four million (4,000,000) Shares are available for issuance, provided that Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to RSUs (meaning Employee, Discretionary and Director RSUs) which are cancelled, terminated without having been redeemed, or are redeemed for cash, will again be available for issuance under the RSU Plan, except that Shares underlying an RSU granted prior to December 8, 2016 which are redeemed for cash will not again be available for issuance under the RSU Plan. Under no circumstances may the RSU Plan, together with all of Centerra’s other security-based compensation arrangements, result in (a) the number of Shares issuable pursuant to the RSUs and/or other units or stock options to any one person exceeding 5% of the outstanding Shares; or (b) the number of Shares (i) issuable to insiders at any time or (ii) issued to insiders within any one-year period, exceeding 10% of the outstanding Shares.
38
If a participant under the RSU Plan dies, the legal representatives of the estate of such participant may elect the redemption date of the RSUs and in the case of Director RSUs, whether to receive cash or Shares on the redemption. RSUs are not transferable or assignable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
The RSU Plan is administered by the HRC Committee, subject to the HRC Committee reporting to the Board on all matters requiring approval of the Board. The HRC Committee has the authority, in the case of specified capital reorganizations affecting the Company, to determine appropriate equitable adjustments, if any, to be made under the RSU Plan, including adjustments to the number of securities which have been authorized for issuance under the RSU Plan, the number of securities subject to the RSUs and the number of RSUs outstanding. The HRC Committee also reserves the right to amend, suspend or terminate the RSU Plan, in whole or in part, at any time, subject to applicable laws and requirements of any stock exchange or governmental or regulatory body (including any requirement for shareholder approval). The HRC Committee may make certain amendments to the RSU Plan without seeking shareholder approval, such as housekeeping amendments, amendments necessary to comply with law, amendments to meet changes in tax law, amendments to the vesting provisions of the RSU Plan or any RSU, amendments to the termination or early termination provisions of the RSU Plan or any RSU and amendments necessary to suspend or terminate the RSU Plan. However, shareholder approval is required for: (i) amendments to increase the number of Shares issuable under the RSU Plan, including an increase to a fixed maximum number of Shares or a change from a fixed maximum number of Shares to a fixed maximum percentage; (ii) amendments to remove or exceed the insider participation limits; (iii) amendments extending the term of a RSU or any rights pursuant thereto held by an insider beyond its original expiry date; (iv) amendments to increase the limits previously imposed on non-employee director participants; (v) amendments which would allow for the transfer or assignment of RSUs under the RSU Plan other than for normal estate settlement purposes; (vi) amendments to the amendment provisions of the RSU Plan; (vii) amendments required to be approved by shareholders under applicable law (including, without limitation, the rules, regulations and policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange). If the RSU Plan is terminated, its provisions will continue as long as RSUs or rights remain outstanding.
Directors’ Share Ownership
Centerra has established a Share ownership policy for its non-executive directors of Shares requiring a value equal to three times such director’s annual retainer (from time to time), to be acquired within a period of five years of becoming a director. When a director receives an increase in annual retainer, which would result in an increase to ownership requirement, the director has five years from the date of such increase to achieve the incremental Share ownership requirement. The director Share ownership required amounts are set out in each nominee director’s profile. See “Business to be Transacted at the Meeting – Election of Directors” starting on page 5.
Mr. Perry, as President and CEO, is not remunerated for his service on the Board and, as a result, is not subject to the minimum ownership requirement that applies to non-executive directors of Centerra. However, he is subject to the minimum ownership requirements that apply to executives of Centerra. See “Executive Share Ownership” on page 28.
Since the value of DSUs and Director RSUs are tied directly to Centerra’s Share price, DSUs and Director RSUs count toward the achievement of these ownership levels, in addition to Shares themselves. DSUs and Director RSUs are Share units which have already been earned by directors and are not contingent on future conditions, including performance or time vesting.
When calculating the value of the Share ownership of directors, Shares held are valued at the higher of cost (“Book Value” for Shares) and the current fair market value (based on a five-day VWAP, the “Market Value” for Shares). DSUs and Director RSUs are valued at the greater of the fair market value at the date of award/grant (the “Book Value” for DSUs and Director RSUs) and the current fair market value (based on a five-day VWAP, the “Market Value” for DSUs and Director RSUs).
39
The following table sets out the Share ownership of each the Company’s incumbent directors, their Share ownership requirement, calculated as of July 15, 2022 and a description of whether each director meets their Share ownership requirements. Directors have five years to meet their Share ownership requirement. Each of the directors were, as of July 15, 2022, in compliance with their Share ownership requirements.
| Director Name | Target Share Ownership Amount ($) | Type of Value | Common ($) | DSUs ($) | Director ($) | Book Value of Holdings(1) ($) | Total Current Market Value of Holdings(2) ($) | Meets | Current Holdings (as a multiple of Annual Board Retainer)(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard Connor | 526,500 | Acquisition Value | 94,630 | 400,039 | 28,870 | 523,539 | 653,957 | Meets | 3.73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 155,200 | 474,166 | 24,591 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wendy Kei | 526,500 | Acquisition Value | - | 19,367 | - | 19,367 | 16,523 | In Progress | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | - | 16,523 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michael Parrett | 930,000 | Acquisition Value | 40,796 | - | 1,168,572 | 1,209,367 | 1,123,414 | Meets | 3.90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 58,960 | - | 1,064,455 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jacques Perron | 526,500 | Acquisition Value | 730,525 | - | - | 730,525 | 792,552 | Meets | 4.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 792,550 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sheryl Pressler | 526,500 | Acquisition Value | 291,813 | 249,478 | 28,870 | 570,160 | 595,797 | Meets | 3.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 310,136 | 261,070 | 24,591 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bruce Walter | 840,000 | Acquisition Value | 78,600 | 1,813,546 | 287,302 | 2,179,449 | 2,074,602 | Meets | 7.78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 116,400 | 1,718,387 | 239,815 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul Wright | 526,500 | Acquisition Value | 95,055 | 159,278 | 106,121 | 360,454 | 243,830 | In Progress | 2.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | 58,200 | 111,405 | 74,217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Susan Yurkovich | 526,500 | Acquisition Value | - | 764,827 | - | 764,827 | 637,727 | Meets | 4.36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | - | 637,727 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Book value of holdings is calculated as follows: (i) Shares are valued at cost at acquisition; and (ii) DSUs and Director RSUs are valued based on the intended value at the time of grant (valued at the five-day VWAP as of the grant date). |
| (2) | Market value of holdings is determined as follows: the total holdings multiplied by $7.76, the five-day VWAP of Centerra Shares on the TSX as of July 15, 2022. |
| (3) | Directors have five years to meet their Share ownership requirement. Mr. Wright and Ms. Kei have until May 1, 2025 and May 3, 2027 to meet their Share ownership requirements, respectively. |
| (4) | Calculated at the higher of Book Value of Holdings and Total Current Market Value of Holdings divided by current annual cash retainer. |
Directors Share-Based Awards, Option-Based Awards and Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
Director incentive plan awards take the form of DSUs and Director RSUs. The following sets out Share-based awards (DSUs and Director RSUs) as of December 31, 2021 for all non-executive directors in 2021. DSUs do not vest until the director ceases to hold any positions with the Company. Director RSUs vest immediately but are redeemed and paid at the election of the directors. The following sets out only those DSUs and Director RSUs which remained outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and were not redeemed in 2021. DSUs and Director RSUs redeemed during 2021 are found in the next table. Non-executive directors of Centerra do not have any option-based awards or any non-equity incentive plan compensation.
| Share-based Awards(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares (#) | Market or Payout ($)(2) | Number of (#) | Market or ($)(2) | |||||||||||||
| Tengiz Bolturuk(3) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Richard Connor | 60,342 | 588,336 | 2,979 | 29,045 | ||||||||||||
| Dushenaly Kasenov(4) | - | - | 12,057 | 117,556 | ||||||||||||
| Nurlan Kyshtobaev(4) | - | - | 7,990 | 77,903 | ||||||||||||
| Maksat Kobonbaev(3) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Michael Parrett | - | - | 125,972 | 1,228,227 | ||||||||||||
| Jacques Perron | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Sheryl Pressler | 33,224 | 323,930 | 2,979 | 29,045 | ||||||||||||
| Bruce Walter | 205,393 | 2,002,582 | 30,520 | 297,570 | ||||||||||||
| Paul Wright | 10,760 | 104,914 | 7,168 | 69,888 | ||||||||||||
| Susan Yurkovich | 72,828 | 710,073 | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Share-based awards for director compensation can be either in the form of DSUs or Director RSUs. Director RSUs vest immediately upon their grant by the Company but are not paid out or distributed until the director elects a redemption date, which date can be during the time when he or she continues to act as a director of Centerra. In contrast, DSUs do not vest until they are redeemed in accordance with their terms and cannot be redeemed until the director no longer holds a position with Centerra or its subsidiaries. Despite the differences in vesting, both Director RSUs and DSUs represent earned compensation for directors as there is no further performance requirement to be achieved. |
| (2) | The value of DSUs and Director RSUs was determined by multiplying the number of DSUs and Director RSUs held by a director by the closing price on the TSX of Centerra’s Shares on December 31, 2021, which was $9.75. |
| (3) | Messrs. Bolturuk and Kobonbaev were directors in 2021 until May 16, 2021 and May 11, 2021, respectively. |
| (4) | Messrs. Kasenov and Kyshtobaev resigned from the Board effective July 29, 2022. |
40
Directors Incentive Plan Awards (Value Earned During 2021)
Director Deferred Share Units
No DSUs were redeemed during 2021 by directors.
Director Restricted Share Units
All Director RSUs are vested immediately upon grant by the Company and can be redeemed at any time thereafter in accordance with its terms (See “Director Compensation - Amended and Restated Restricted Share Unit Plan – Director RSUs” on page 38). The following table sets out Director RSUs which were redeemed for cash or Shares in 2021 by current directors:
| Director Name | Redemption Date | Director
RSUs Redeemed (#) | Gross
Redemption ($) | Market Value
($) | ||||||||||
| Jacques Perron | March 31, 2021 | 2,641 | 28,866 | 10.93 | ||||||||||
| June 30, 2021 | 2,973 | 28,868 | 9.71 | |||||||||||
| September 30, 2021 | 3,300 | 28,875 | 8.75 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | 2,979 | 28,867 | 9.69 | |||||||||||
| Richard Connor | February 14, 2021 | 1,917 | 26,570 | 13.86 | ||||||||||
| May 15, 2021 | 2,641 | 23,056 | 8.73 | |||||||||||
| August 14, 2021 | 2,973 | 27,560 | 9.27 | |||||||||||
| November 14, 2021 | 3,300 | 34,914 | 10.58 | |||||||||||
| Sheryl Pressler | February 14, 2021 | 1,917 | 26,570 | 13.86 | ||||||||||
| May 15, 2021 | 2,641 | 23,056 | 8.73 | |||||||||||
| August 14, 2021 | 2,973 | 27,560 | 9.27 | |||||||||||
| November 14, 2021 | 3,300 | 34,914 | 10.58 | |||||||||||
| (1) | Gross Redemption Amount is determined by multiplying the number of Director RSUs redeemed by the market value of Shares as at the Redemption Date, being the VWAP, in Canadian dollars, of the Shares on the TSX, for the five trading days immediately before the Redemption Date. Amounts in the number of Director RSUs redeemed are rounded and therefore the “Gross Redemption Amount” may not reconcile precisely. The amounts reflected above do not differentiate between RSUs awarded in cash or Shares. The “Gross Redemption Amount” does not reflect whether a director received cash or Shares in respect of the redeemed Director RSUs. |
The following Director RSUs were redeemed for cash or Shares in 2021 by individuals who were directors of Centerra during 2021, but are no longer directors of Centerra:
| Director Name | Termination Date (Date when ceased being a Director) | Redemption Date | Director RSUs Redeemed (#) | Gross Redemption ($) | Market Value
($) | |||||||||||
| Tengiz Bolturuk | May 16, 2021 | March 1, 2021 March 31, 2021 | 840 3,773 | 11,231 41,239 | 13.37 10.93 | |||||||||||
| Maksat Kobonbaev | May 11, 2021 | March 3, 2021 | 2,776 | 35,033 | 12.62 | |||||||||||
| March 30, 2021 | 3,249 | 35,609 | 10.96 | |||||||||||||
| August 5, 2021 | 1,649 | 16,408 | 9.95 | |||||||||||||
| August 10, 2021 | 1,000 | 9,640 | 9.64 | |||||||||||||
| September 3, 2021 | 2,467 | 23,437 | 9.50 | |||||||||||||
| September 8, 2021 | 2,032 | 18,959 | 9.33 | |||||||||||||
| Dushenaly Kasenov | July 29, 2022 | March 23, 2021 | 9,080 | 111,684 | 12.30 | |||||||||||
| (1) | Gross Redemption Amount is determined by multiplying the number of Director RSUs redeemed by the market value of Shares as at the Redemption Date, being the VWAP, in Canadian dollars, of the Shares on the TSX, for the five trading days immediately before the Redemption Date. Amounts in the number of Director RSUs redeemed are rounded and therefore the “Gross Redemption Amount” may not reconcile precisely. The “Gross Redemption Amount” does not reflect whether a director received cash or Shares in respect of the redeemed Director RSUs. |
41
REPORT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board and management believe that sound and effective corporate governance is essential to Centerra’s performance. Centerra has adopted certain practices and procedures to ensure that effective corporate governance practices are followed and that the Board functions independently of management. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board reviews Centerra’s corporate governance practices and procedures on a regular basis to ensure that they address significant issues of corporate governance.
The following statement sets out a description of Centerra’s corporate governance practices as approved by the Board and in accordance with the requirements set forth in National Instrument 58-101 — Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (“NI 58-101”).
Board Mandate
The Board supervises the conduct of the affairs of the Company directly and through its committees. In so doing, the Board acts in the best interests of the Company. In addition, the Board recognizes the importance of the enhancement of both short and longer-term value. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Board appoints the executive officers of the Company and meets with them on a regular basis to receive and consider reports on the Company’s business. The Board holds regularly scheduled meetings, with additional meetings being held as required to consider particular issues or conduct specific reviews between regularly scheduled meetings. Between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021, the Board held 9 meetings. In addition, from mid-March 2021 to approximately August 2021, the Board had periodic updates with the Company’s senior management team to discuss the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations, including the implementation and management of its safety protocols, and starting from August 2021, received regular written updates from the President and CEO.
The fundamental responsibility of the Board is to supervise the management of Centerra’s business and affairs with a view to sustainable value creation for all shareholders. Centerra’s Board promotes fair reporting, including financial reporting, to shareholders and other interested persons as well as ethical and legal corporate conduct through an appropriate system of corporate governance, internal controls and disclosure controls.
The Board is, among other matters, responsible for the following:
| · | selection, appointment, evaluation and setting compensation of, and, if necessary, termination of the CEO; |
| · | oversight of CEO’s selection, appointment, evaluation and termination of other executive officers; |
| · | satisfying itself as to the integrity of the CEO and other senior officers of the Company and as to the culture of integrity throughout the Company; |
| · | adoption of a strategic planning process and approval of strategic plans; |
| · | risk management policies and procedures; |
| · | policies and procedures regarding the integrity of financial reporting and information management; |
| · | oversight of estimates of Centerra’s mineral reserves by management; |
| · | human resources policies; |
| · | health, safety and environmental policies; |
| · | disclosure policies and procedures; |
| · | corporate governance; |
| · | environmental and social governance; and |
| · | certain other matters which may not be delegated by the Board under applicable corporate law. |
The Board has adopted a formal written mandate which clarifies these responsibilities and is complemented by the written mandates of each of its standing committees. The Board and committee mandates are reviewed at least annually by the Board. The full text of the Board mandate is set out in Appendix A. A copy of the mandates for the Board and each standing committee can also be found on Centerra’s website at www.centerragold.com.
42
Directors frequently (in person, by phone or virtually) meet individually or in groups with senior management in work sessions to obtain further insight and provide guidance into the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries, and are involved on a regular basis in discussions with management. Each Board committee may engage outside advisors at the expense of the Company. Individual directors are also free to consult with members of senior management whenever required and to engage outside advisors, at the expense of the Company, with the authorization of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Board Chair
The Board appointed Mr. Parrett as the Chair of the Board as of October 1, 2019. Mr. Parrett has been an independent member of the Board since May 8, 2014.
Pursuant to the Board Mandate, the Chair is principally responsible for overseeing the operations and affairs of the Board. The Chair’s responsibilities include leading, managing and organizing the Board, consistent with the approach to corporate governance adopted by the Board from time to time; confirming that appropriate procedures are in place to allow the Board to work effectively and efficiently and to function independent from management; acting as a liaison between the Board and senior management; encouraging effective communication between the Board and the CEO, and working with the CEO, the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Corporate Secretary to further the creation of a healthy governance culture within Centerra.
Position Descriptions of Board Chair, Vice Chair and Chief Executive Officer
The Board has adopted position descriptions for the Chair and Vice Chair of the Board, which set out the duties and responsibilities of the Chair and Vice Chair. These position descriptions are reviewed by the Board annually. The position descriptions for the Chair and Vice Chair of the Board are contained in the Board Mandate. The Board Mandate also provides that the chair of each committee is responsible for determining the agenda, and the frequency and conduct of the meetings of that committee.
The Board has also adopted a position description for Centerra’s CEO, which sets out the duties and responsibilities of the CEO. This position description is reviewed by the Board annually.
Overseeing the Chief Executive Officer
The CEO is appointed by the Board and is responsible for managing Centerra’s affairs. The CEO’s key responsibilities include articulating the vision for the Company, focusing on creating value for shareholders, and developing and implementing a strategic plan that is consistent with the corporate vision.
Annually, the Board sets objectives for the CEO which align with the Company’s strategic plan. These objectives include both specific quantifiable goals and general goals that are qualitative and not driven by a predetermined mathematical formula. The Board conducts a formal review of the CEO’s performance once per year.
The CEO is accountable to the Board and the Board committees. The Board Chair meets frequently with the CEO to discuss the affairs of the Company and to provide guidance and feedback. Throughout the year, on an ad hoc basis, the CEO also interacts with individual Board members to discuss matters.
The Board has established clear limits of authority for the CEO. These are described in Centerra’s delegation of financial authority policy.
The Board receives regular reports from the CEO on Centerra’s operating activities as well as timely reports on certain non-operational matters, including risk management, finance, safety, health, environment, corporate social responsibility, legal, government relations, business development, human resources, corporate governance, investor relations, and insurance matters.
Strategic Planning
The Board works with management in developing the overall business strategy of the Company and the annual business plans for achieving its objectives, which form the annual objectives for the CEO. The Board receives regular updates from management regarding management’s implementation of the business strategy.
Along with those matters which must by law be approved by the Board, key strategic decisions are also submitted by management to the Board for approval or discussion. In addition to approving specific corporate actions, the Board reviews and approves the reports issued to shareholders, including annual and interim financial statements and management information circulars.
43
Independence of Board Members
Centerra has a total of nine board members which includes the CEO and eight independent board members (as further described below).
Centerra’s Board has assessed the independence of each director. In determining independence, the Board examined and relied on the definition of independence in NI 58-101. After considering a wide variety of factors and information disclosed by each director, the Board has determined that a majority (89%) of the current directors (eight of nine) are independent.
The Board has determined that Mr. Perry is not independent because, as President and CEO of the Company, he is a member of management.
To ensure that the Board is able to discharge its responsibilities independently of management, the independent director(s) have regularly scheduled opportunities to meet separately from management and the non-independent directors following each meeting of the Board. In 2021, the independent members of the Board met 9 times, during each of the formal Board meetings. In connection with the Company’s former operations in the Kyrgyz Republic, the Board also established a Special Committee comprised entirely of independent directors to, among other things, oversee, review, evaluate and consider related party transactions, including matters relating to the Kyrgyz Government. In 2021, the Special Committee met 13 times (see “Committees of the Board” below).
Interlocking Directorships
An “interlock” occurs where two or more Board members also serve together as board members of another public company. Currently, no members of the Board have any interlocking directorships and, as such, the Company has not found a need to adopt a formal policy relating to interlocking directorships.
Majority Voting and Advance Notice Nominations
In accordance with the CBCA, for all uncontested shareholder meetings held on or after August 31, 2022, each director nominee will be elected at the Meeting only if the number of votes cast “for” the nominee represents a majority of the total votes cast “for” and “against” them. However, under the CBCA majority voting rules, if an incumbent director is not elected by a majority of votes at the Meeting, the incumbent director will be permitted to continue in office until the earlier of (i) the 90th day after the Meeting and (ii) the day on which their successor is appointed or elected
In light of the CBCA majority voting requirements described above, the Board has resolved to revoke the Company’s majority voting policy effective as of August 31, 2022 which therefore will not be applicable to the election of directors at the Meeting.
In addition to the requirements under the CBCA (and prior to August 31, 2022, the majority voting policy), the Company’s by-laws require that any shareholder seeking to nominate a director at a shareholder meeting must provide advance notice of the individual(s) the shareholder intends to nominate as well as certain other prescribed information. The by-laws provide for a reasonable time frame in which to notify the Company of an intention to nominate directors and require a level of disclosure of information concerning proposed nominees that the Company would be required to include in a management information circular in respect of the election of directors. This procedure affords the Board the opportunity to evaluate the qualifications of all director nominees and their suitability as directors while providing shareholders with adequate notice and information regarding director nominations to be considered at a meeting.
In the case of an annual meeting of shareholders, notice to the Company must be received not later than 30 and not earlier than 65 days prior to the date of the annual meeting; provided, however, that if the first public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is less than 50 days prior to the meeting, notice must be received not later than the 10th day following such public announcement. In the case of a special meeting (which is not also an annual meeting) of shareholders called for any purposes which includes the election of directors, notice to the Company must be received not later than the close of business on the 15th day following the day on which the first public announcement of the date of the special meeting is made.
44
Skills Matrix
The matrix below shows the Board’s mix of skills and experience in areas that are important to the Company’s business, assuming each of the Company’s nominee directors are elected to the Board at the Meeting. The skills matrix is also used to identify those skills for which the Company should recruit when making changes to the Board. The skills matrix is based on self-assessments by the directors and other information disclosed by current nominee directors in annual questionnaires:
| Board Experience | International Business Experience | Mining,
Exploration & Operations | Human Resources | Financial Literacy | Corporate Governance | Environmental and Social Performance | Health & Safety | Strategy & Leadership | Investment Banking/ Mergers & Acquisitions | Government Relations/ Political Risk | Senior Officer | Technology/ Cybersecurity | Risk Management | |||||||||||||||
| Richard Connor | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Wendy Kei | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||
| Michael Parrett | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||||||
| Jacques Perron | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||
| Scott Perry | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||
| Sheryl Pressler | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Bruce Walter | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||
| Paul Wright | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||
| Susan Yurkovich | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü |
Overseeing and Managing Risk
The Board is responsible for overseeing Centerra’s policies and processes to identify the Company’s principal business risks and to confirm that systems are in place to mitigate these risks where prudent to do so. Risk oversight is overseen by the Board as follows:
| · | Risk Committee: The Risk Committee oversees the policies, process and systems for the identification, assessment and management of the Company’s principal strategic, financial and operational risks. The Risk Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities including, but not limited to: (a) reviewing the Company’s insurance program, including its annual property and casualty insurance program, risk retention, coverage adequacy and any residual risk exposures; (b) reviewing with management, at least annually, the Corporation’s overall risk appetite and tolerance and making recommendations to the Board; and (c) overseeing, in conjunction with other Board committees or the full Board, significant or critical risks, including strategic, financial and operational risks. The Risk Committee must be composed of at least one member from the other standing committees of the Board to ensure information is shared and managed across the committees. |
| · | Audit Committee: The Audit Committee monitors financial related risks, including risks relating to internal controls over financial reporting, the delegation of financial authority, and financial risk management policies. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, code of ethics and international business conduct (anti-corruption) policies. |
| · | Human Resources and Compensation Committee: The HRC Committee oversees and manages compensation related risks and retention and succession risks. |
| · | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks related to corporate governance matters. |
| · | Sustainable Operations Committee: The Sustainable Operations Committee oversees risks relating to safety, health, environment, sustainability and mineral reserves matters. |
45
Committees of the Board of Directors
Each standing Board committee operates under a written mandate/charter that sets out its responsibilities and duties, qualifications for membership, procedures for committee member removal and appointment and reporting to the Board. The charters are reviewed annually by the relevant committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may make recommendations to the Board for changes. In the first quarter of 2022, the composition of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was refreshed. Ms. Pressler ceased to be a member of each of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Ms. Kei was appointed to the Audit Committee, Mr. Connor was appointed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Mr. Parrett was appointed Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Below is a summary of the current composition of the Board committees and a brief description of the responsibilities of each committee and its members. Charters for each standing Board committee can be found on Centerra’s website.
| Committee | Members | Independence | ||
| Audit Committee | Richard Connor (Chair) Michael Parrett Wendy Kei | Independent Independent Independent | ||
| Human Resources & Compensation Committee | Susan Yurkovich (Chair) Richard Connor Michael Parrett | Independent Independent Independent | ||
| Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee | Michael Parrett (Chair) Richard Connor Wendy Kei Susan Yurkovich | Independent Independent Independent Independent | ||
| Risk Committee | Jacques Perron (Chair) Richard Connor Sheryl Pressler Paul Wright | Independent Independent Independent Independent | ||
| Sustainable Operations Committee | Bruce Walter (Chair) Jacques Perron Paul Wright Susan Yurkovich | Independent Independent Independent Independent | ||
| Special Committee | Bruce Walter (Chair) Richard Connor Jacques Perron Sheryl Pressler Paul Wright Susan Yurkovich | Independent Independent Independent Independent Independent Independent |
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to, among other things:
| · | financial reporting; |
| · | the external auditor; |
| · | the internal auditor; |
| · | compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related to financial reporting and certain corporate policies; |
| · | whistleblower process; |
| · | internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls; and |
| · | any additional matters delegated to the Audit Committee by the Board. |
The Board has determined that all of the Audit Committee members are financially literate as required by applicable securities legislation. In 2021, the Audit Committee met 5 times.
Information regarding the Audit Committee can be found under “Audit Committee” in the Company’s Annual Information Form (“AIF”). A copy of the Company’s most recently filed AIF can be obtained by securityholders of the Company free of charge by contacting the Company at 1 University Avenue, Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2P1, Canada, Attention: Toby Caron, Director, Investor Relations, or (416) 204-1953 or can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar, and the Company’s website at www.centerragold.com.
46
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to, among other things:
| · | Centerra’s overall approach to corporate governance; |
| · | the size, composition and structure of the Board and its committees; |
| · | the identification and recommendation to the Board of qualified individuals for appointment to the Board and its committees; |
| · | orientation and continuing education for directors; |
| · | matters involving conflicts of interest of directors; and |
| · | any additional matters delegated to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by the Board. |
In 2021, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met 6 times.
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
The HRC Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to, among other things:
| · | the selection and retention of senior management; |
| · | the compensation of senior management; |
| · | senior management succession and development; |
| · | diversity, equity and inclusion; |
| · | human resources policies; and |
| · | any additional matters delegated to the HRC Committee by the Board. |
In 2021, the HRC Committee met 6 times.
Sustainable Operations Committee
The Sustainable Operations Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to, among other things:
| · | the establishment and review of Centerra’s safety, health and environmental policies; |
| · | management of the implementation of compliance systems; |
| · | monitoring the effectiveness of Centerra’s safety, health and environmental policies, systems and monitoring processes; |
| · | receiving audit results and updates from management with respect to Centerra’s health, safety and environmental performance; |
| · | reviewing the annual budget for safety, health and environmental operations; |
| · | the Company’s sustainability policies, programs and performance; |
| · | the estimation of mineral reserves by management; |
| · | the review of mineral reserve information before publication; and |
| · | any additional matters delegated to the Sustainable Operations Committee by the Board. |
In 2021, the Sustainable Operations Committee met 5 times.
Risk Committee
The Risk Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to, among other things:
| · | Company-wide risk management practices; |
| · | overseeing that the executive team has in place processes designed to identify and assess the key risks that the organization faces and has established appropriate mechanisms designed to address those risks; |
| · | overseeing, in conjunction with other Board-level committees or the full Board, significant or critical risks, including strategic, financial and operational risks; and |
| · | clarifying the division of risk-related responsibilities to each Board committee and analysis to determine that the oversight of significant or critical risks is not overlooked. |
In 2021, the Risk Committee met 5 times.
47
Special Committee
The Board also established a Special Committee comprised entirely of independent directors to, among other things, oversee, review, evaluate and consider related party transactions, including, prior to its separation from the Kyrgyz Republic, matters relating to the Kyrgyz Government.
In 2021, the Special Committee met 13 times.
Diversity of the Company’s Directors and Officers
Centerra’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DE&I) Policy
Centerra has a written DE&I policy, which recognizes the importance to the Company of having a leadership group (includes directors and officers of the Company) comprised of highly talented, experienced and dedicated individuals with a diverse mix of experience, skills and background collectively reflecting the strategic needs of the business and representing the local communities in which we operate. The Company also recognizes that diversity is critical to the future success of Centerra and will strive to enhance its focus on the advancement of all underrepresented groups throughout the Company and to foster a culture of equity and inclusion.
The Company strives to maintain overall diverse representation among the leadership group and is targeting a minimum of 30% women representation in both the director and officer groups when evaluated separately by the end of 2026.
While diversity is an important and valuable consideration in assessing potential candidates for appointment to the leadership group, all appointments will continue to be made on merit in the context of knowledge, experience, skills and background of each individual candidate in light of the needs of the Board and the Company. When assessing Board and Officer composition or identifying candidates to nominate for election to the Board or for appointment as an Officer, the Company will consider and apply the following practices:
| · | candidates who are highly qualified based on business expertise, functional experience, knowledge, personal skills and character against objective criteria, having due regard to the benefits of diversity, the needs of the Board, the Company’s current and future plans and objectives, as well as anticipated regulatory developments; |
| · | candidates that represent diverse groups, including with regard to gender, ethnicity, age, national origin, persons with disabilities, Indigenous peoples, visible minorities, and sexual orientation; |
| · | the level of representation of women on the Board and in senior management positions along with other markers of diversity when making recommendations for nominees to the Board or for appointment as senior management and in general with regard to succession planning for the Board and the senior leadership team; |
| · | engaging qualified independent external advisors to assist the Board and management in conducting its search for candidates as required. Search protocols will include a robust and rigorous process, using a committee and/or professional search firm specifically directed to include a diverse pool of candidates, including women and members of the designated groups or other underrepresented groups; and |
| · | in the event the Board maintains an ongoing list of potential director candidates or the Company maintains a list of potential Officer candidates within its successor pool of talent, the Board and Company will ensure that such list includes members of the designated and other underrepresented groups and, in particular, women candidates. |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reports to the Board on efforts regarding diversity with respect to Board members and the HRC Committee shall periodically report to the Board on the appointment of Officers and report on the implementation of the DE&I policy.
The Company recognizes that DE&I is imperative for long term success and that the journey begins at the top. To that end, the Company has created a Global DE&I Executive Council, sponsored, and chaired by the President and CEO with representation from senior management. The Company has also created four regional committees, all sponsored by a regional executive and led by employee members. The Global DE&I Executive Council is responsible for the continued development of the DE&I global strategy, supports alignment of regional strategies, makes decisions on various DE&I initiatives and oversees the successful implementation of the strategy through the four regional committees. The Council is responsible for reporting back on progress to the senior management team and to the Board. In 2021, employees spent 816 hours completing various DE&I-related training globally, and leaders spent 396 hours in Unconscious Bias and Cultural Competence Training. Fundamentals of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion training was launched globally and is included in all new hire orientations as mandatory learning. Centerra has also partnered with the Canadian Center for Diversity and Inclusion and is working with their DE&I experts to develop strategies and action plans to increase diversity and promote inclusivity across Centerra.
48
The Company continues to support women’s leadership programs, the identification and assessment of high potential female talent, and the creation of individual development plans to monitor progression. In 2021, Centerra became a Silver sponsor for International Women in Mining (“IWiM”). The Company participated in several initiatives alongside IWiM including women mentorship programs, inclusive workplace design workshops, and posting jobs onto their website to attract women in the workforce and in leadership positions.
As of the date of this Circular, the number of members of the Company’s leadership group who self-identify as members of the following designated groups are as follows:
| Designated Group | Number of
Board Members | Number
of Executive Officers(1) | Total
Board Members and Executive Officers(2) | |||||||||
| Women | 3/9 (33%) | 1/5 (20%) | 4/13 (32%) | |||||||||
| Indigenous peoples (First Nations, Inuit, Metis) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| Persons with Disabilities | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| Members of Visible Minorities | 1/9 (11%) | 2/5 (40%) | 3/13 (23%) | |||||||||
| Total Representation of Designated Groups | 3/9 (33%)(3) | 3/5 (60%) | 6/13 (46%)(3) | |||||||||
| (1) | This definition aligns with the definition of “executive officer” generally found in Canadian securities laws. |
| (2) | Total of Board members and executive officers does not add up to 14 because Scott Perry, who is a director and an executive officer, is counted once. |
| (3) | One directors self-identified as a member of two Designated Groups. |
Board Renewal
The Board’s mandate includes a mandatory retirement provision that allows directors to serve on the Board until the annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders next following their 75th birthday and that directors may not be re-elected after reaching age 75, unless this requirement is waived by the Board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for a valid reason.
Since 2016, seven (7) new directors have joined the Board – Ms. Kei (appointed in 2022); Mr. Kyshtobaev (elected in 2021 and resigned in 2022); Messrs. Wright and Bolturuk (both elected in 2020; Mr. Bolturuk resigned in 2021); Mr. Kasenov and Mr. Kobonbaev (both elected in 2019; Mr. Kobonbaev resigned in 2021 and Mr. Kasenov resigned in 2022), Ms. Yurkovich and Mr. Oskombaev (both elected in 2018; Mr. Oskombaev resigned in 2020) and Mr. Perron (in 2016). The Board has therefore concluded that the existing Board renewal mechanism as well as the natural turnover of the Board continues to result in a good mix of directors with experience in the Company’s ongoing matters as well as new directors who can bring fresh voices to the Board’s discussion. Accordingly, the Board has not adopted term limits for directors, especially due to the potential loss of contributions from directors who have significant insight into the Company and its operations. The Board will continue to evaluate whether strict term limits would be advisable on an ongoing basis.
Assessment Process
Annually, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the effectiveness of the Board, its committees, the Chair and the Vice Chair through the use of a confidential self-assessment questionnaire completed by each director. In the assessment, directors are also asked to comment on the performance of their peer directors. The results of the surveys are subsequently discussed by the Board.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, through questionnaires and interviews, assesses the operation of the Board and the committees, the adequacy of information given to directors, communication between the Board and management, the effectiveness of the processes of the Board and committees, and the effectiveness of the Board and individual directors. The committee recommends to the Board any changes needed to enhance performance based upon this assessment process.
49
Nomination of New Directors and Board Size
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assessing the need for new directors, and the preferred experience and qualifications of new directors, taking into consideration the independence, age, skills and experience required for the effective conduct of the Company’s business as well as the requirements of the Company’s DE&I policy discussed above. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends candidates for Board membership and Board members for re-nomination. Recommendations are based upon character, integrity, judgment, business experience, record of achievement and any other skills or talents that would enhance the Board and overall management of the business and affairs of the Company as well as the criteria laid out in the Company’s DE&I policy.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee maintains a schedule of the anticipated tenure of current directors, and the needs of the Board as a whole. Candidates are considered in light of the Board’s current and anticipated needs. Board members complete annual skills and experience self-assessments, which are reviewed by the committee to assist in placing Board members on committees where their expertise can best be utilized and also to identify skills and experience gaps important in identifying any new nominees to the Board.
The Board is of the view that its optimal size for effective decision-making and committee work is between 8-11 members.
Board Education Opportunities
Centerra provides new directors with orientation materials describing the business of the Company, its corporate governance structure and related policies and information. Centerra’s CEO, CFO and other senior executives provide new directors with detailed briefings on Company strategy, operations, risk profile, business development, legal, financial, exploration, human resources and investor and government relations matters.
Continuing education is provided by management through presentations to the Board and committees when any key business decisions are sought. Directors are briefed regularly on strategic issues affecting the Company. Board members are also encouraged to attend conferences or seminars at Centerra’s expense. Such conferences or seminars can deal with any subject matter that is applicable to the Board member’s role on the Board or its committees or to increase the member’s knowledge of the Company’s business. For example: the Sustainable Operations Committee received regular presentations from the Company’s Vice President, Security, Sustainability & Environment on topics, including “Responsible Gold Mining Principles”, received reports from a political risk consultancy group for relevant jurisdictions, and updates on mergers and acquisitions from investment banks. Specific continuing education is listed in the following table.
| Date (2021) | Subject | Attendees | Presenter | |||
| August 9 | Market Trends & Hot Topics in Executive Compensation Design & Governance | Susan Yurkovich Richard Connor Michael Parrett | Willis Towers Watson | |||
| May 6 | ESG Journey – Protecting and Strengthening Long Term Company Value | Richard Connor Dushenaly Kasenov Maksat Kobonbaev Michael Parrett Jacques Perron Scott Perry Sheryl Pressler Bruce Walter Paul Wright Susan Yurkovich | Vice President, Security Sustainability & Environment of Centerra | |||
| November 4 | Trends in Corporate Governance | Sheryl Pressler Michael Parrett Susan Yurkovich Richard Connor | Stikeman Elliott LLP |
50
Board members are also encouraged to visit the Company’s main operating sites and regularly do so. In 2021, the Board as a whole did not visit any of the Company’s operations in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Compensation of Directors
The Board believes that compensation for directors should be competitive with the compensation paid to directors of comparable companies. The HRC Committee reviews directors’ compensation every two years with the assistance of an independent consultant and makes recommendations to the Board. The most recent director compensation review was carried out in 2021, and accordingly the next review will be carried out in 2023. The HRC Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors. For more information on Board compensation, see “Report on Executive Compensation – Director Compensation” on page 37.
Codes of Ethics
Centerra’s Board expects all of Centerra’s directors, officers and employees to conduct themselves in accordance with the highest ethical standards.
Centerra’s Board has adopted a Code of Ethics for employees, which addresses, among other things, avoidance of conflicts of interest, protection of confidential information, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, adherence to good disclosure practices, and procedures for employees and third parties to report concerns with respect to accounting and auditing matters. Employees with such concerns may report their concerns directly or, if they so wish, in a confidential or anonymous manner to: (i) the General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company, (ii) the Chair of the Audit Committee, or (iii) a 24 hours-a-day compliance hotline, a service which is operated by a third party and is available in the local languages spoken where the Company’s operating subsidiaries are located. As set out in the Code of Ethics, an employee who, in good faith, reports a concern is protected from reprisal, such as dismissal, demotion, suspension, threats, harassment or discrimination.
The Board has also adopted a Code of Ethics for directors, which sets out the ethical standards that apply to directors in the exercise of their duties. Directors are required to promptly report all actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest to the Corporate Secretary, who is in turn required to bring such conflicts to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Directors may not participate in discussions, deliberations or decision-making in which they have a conflict of interest.
All directors and employees of Centerra are required to sign an annual compliance certificate relating to the Code of Ethics and, in addition, employees undergo training on the Code of Ethics. The Audit Committee receives an annual compliance report for employees, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual report on directors’ compliance. Issues arising between annual reporting are brought to the attention of the appropriate committee.
Copies of the Codes of Ethics for employees and directors can be found on Centerra’s website at www.centerragold.com and are also available in print upon request.
51
Disclosure and Insider Trading Policy
Centerra’s Board has adopted and periodically reviews and updates Centerra’s written corporate disclosure and insider trading policy. The policy addresses the following matters:
| · | establishes a process for the disclosure of material information; |
| · | establishes a process for reviewing news releases, corporate documents and public oral statements before they are issued; |
| · | sets out the obligations of Centerra’s directors, officers and other employees to preserve the confidentiality of undisclosed material information; |
| · | sets out the prohibitions applicable to Centerra’s directors, officers and other employees with respect to illegal insider trading and tipping; and |
| · | prohibits directors and employees of Centerra from hedging the value of any equity-based awards or Shares. |
Shareholder/Investor Communications and Feedback
The Company has procedures in place to effectively communicate with its stakeholders, including its shareholders, employees and the general public. The fundamental objective of these procedures is to ensure an open, accessible and timely exchange of information with shareholders, employees and other stakeholders concerning the business, affairs and performance of the Company. This includes quarterly conference calls with industry analysts, investors/shareholders and media representatives in conjunction with the release of the Company’s financial results, as well as regular presentations to, or meetings with, industry analysts, institutional shareholders, and potential investors. Through the Company’s website, shareholders and other stakeholders may access webcasts of these conference calls and most of the presentations made by the Company to the investment community. The Company has a dedicated investor relations department, which works closely with members of the investment community, institutional investors and individual shareholders. In addition, the Company has in place procedures to ensure that inquiries or other communications from shareholders are answered by an appropriate person in the Company.
During 2021, the majority of shareholder/investor interactions were done virtually in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The President and CEO, the investor relations department and other members of senior management, including the COO and CFO, held over 170 meetings with shareholders and institutional investors, attended 8 industry conferences, and hosted 14 virtual retail broker presentations for individuals located in various major cities in Canada and the U.S.
In 2022, the Board of Directors adopted a Shareholder Engagement Policy to facilitate transparent and direct engagement between members of the Board and Centerra's shareholders, shareholder organizations and governance groups, while complying with the Company's internal policies and applicable laws. A copy of the Shareholder Engagement Policy can be found on Centerra’s website at www.centerragold.com and is also available in print upon request.
Centerra’s board members, including the Board Chair, welcome communications and feedback from the Company’s shareholders or other stakeholders. Interested parties may contact the Board or Centerra’s independent directors as a group by writing to them c/o Chair of the Board, Centerra Gold Inc., 1 University Avenue, Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2P1.
DIRECTORS’ AND OFFICERS’ LIABILITY INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
Centerra’s directors and officers are covered under go-forward and run-off directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies. The aggregate limit of liability applicable to those insured directors and officers under the policies is US$50 million for the run-off policy and US$100 million for the go-forward policy, inclusive of defense costs. The go-forward policy was renewed and modified effective April 15, 2021 to coincide with Centerra’s new listing on the NYSE and will renew for a twelve month period annually commencing June 30, 2022. A run-off policy that expired June 30, 2021 provided coverage for actions by directors and officers that predate June 30, 2009. There is no deductible for officers or directors under these policies, for non-indemnifiable claims made against them for a wrongful act. Where Centerra or a subsidiary has indemnified a director or officer, the go-forward policy provides reimbursement coverage for losses over a deductible of US$2.5 million and US$100,000 for claims covered by the run-off policy. The run-off policy provided for a US$250,000 deductible in respect of securities claims, while the go-forward policy deductible is US$2.5 million. The premium paid by Centerra for 2021 was US$1.65 million for the go-forward policy. The one-time premium paid in 2018 for the final three-year extension to the run-off policy was US$220,000.
52
Centerra’s by-laws also provide for the indemnification of its directors and officers from and against liability and costs in respect of any action or suit against them in connection with the execution of their duties of office, subject to certain limitations. Centerra has also entered into agreements with each of its directors and officers providing for indemnification and related matters.
INTERESTS OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON
No director or executive officer of Centerra, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director of Centerra, or any associate or affiliate of any one of them, has any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any matter to be acted on at the Meeting, other than the election of directors.
INTERESTS OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
Information regarding interests of informed persons in material transactions can be found under the heading “Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions” in the Company’s AIF and management information circular dated June 21, 2022. A copy of the AIF and the June 21, 2022 management information circular can be obtained by securityholders of the Company free of charge by contacting the Company at 1 University Avenue, Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2P1, Canada, Attention: Director, Investor Relations, or (416) 204-1953 or can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar, and the Company’s website at www.centerragold.com.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING
The CBCA permits eligible shareholders of the Company to submit shareholder proposals to the Company, which proposals may be included in a management information circular relating to an annual meeting of shareholders. The period in which the Company must receive shareholder proposals for the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held in 2023 is between April 25, 2023 and June 24, 2023.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Financial information for the financial year ended December 31, 2021 have been provided with this Circular. Shareholders who wish to be added to the mailing list for the annual and interim financial statements and MD&A should contact the Company at 1 University Avenue, Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2P1, or (416) 204-1953, Attention: Director, Investor Relations.
Copies of the Company’s AIF, together with one copy of any document, or the pertinent pages of any document, incorporated by reference in the AIF; the Company’s most recently filed consolidated annual financial statements, together with the accompanying report of the auditor, and any interim financial statements of the Company that have been filed for any period after the end of the Company’s most recently completed financial year; and this Circular are available upon request from the Secretary of the Company or from the Director, Investor Relations, and without charge to securityholders of the Company.
The Annual Report (including the annual financial statements and MD&A), the AIF and other information relating to the Company are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar, and the Company’s website at www.centerragold.com.
DIRECTORS’ APPROVAL
The contents of this Circular and its sending to shareholders of the Company have been approved by the directors of the Company.
| BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | |
| (signed) “Yousef Rehman” | |
| Yousef Rehman | |
| Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | |
| Toronto, Ontario | |
| August 19, 2022 |
53
APPENDIX A
CENTERRA GOLD INC.
BOARD MANDATE
1. GENERAL
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) believes that sound corporate governance practices are essential to the well-being of the Corporation and the promotion and protection of its shareholders’ interests as owners of the Corporation. The Board oversees the functioning of the Corporation’s governance system, in part, through the work of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Board has adopted this mandate to assist it in supervising the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation as required under applicable legislation and stock exchange rules.
The Board will revise this mandate from time to time based on its assessment of the Corporation’s needs, legal and regulatory developments and best practices. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review this mandate annually, or more often if warranted, and recommend to the Board such changes as it deems necessary and appropriate.
2. THE BOARD’S RESPONSIBILITIES
The fundamental responsibility of the Board is to supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation with a view to sustainable value creation for all stakeholders. The Board discharges this responsibility by developing and determining policy by which the business and affairs of the Corporation are to be managed and by overseeing management of the Corporation. The Board promotes fair reporting, including financial reporting, to shareholders of the Corporation and other interested persons as well as ethical and legal corporate conduct through an appropriate system of corporate governance, internal controls and disclosure controls.
3. DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
The primary responsibility of individual directors is to act in good faith and to exercise their business judgment in what they reasonably believe to be the best interests of the Corporation. In order to fulfill this responsibility, each director is expected to:
| · | develop and maintain a thorough understanding of the markets in which the Corporation conducts business, its strategy and business operations and its financial position and performance; |
| · | diligently prepare for each meeting, including reviewing all meeting materials distributed in advance; |
| · | actively and constructively participate in each meeting, including seeking clarification from management and outside advisors where necessary to fully understand the issues under consideration; |
| · | engage in continuing education programs for directors, as appropriate; and |
| · | attend all meetings of the Board and any committee of which he or she is a member. |
4. BOARD COMPOSITION
(a) Board Membership Criteria
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for establishing the competencies and skills that the Board considers to be necessary for the Board as a whole to possess; the competencies and skills that the Board considers each existing director to possess; and the competencies and skills each new nominee will bring to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies candidates for Board membership based on their character, integrity, judgment and record of achievement and any skills and talents they possess which would add to the Board’s decision-making process and enhance the overall management of the business and affairs of the Corporation. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will also take into consideration the representation of women and other minority groups in the director identification and selection process in accordance with the Corporation’s diversity, equity and inclusion policy.
Directors who change their principal occupation are expected to advise the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, if determined appropriate by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, resign from the Board.
A-1
(b) Director Independence
The Board believes that, except during periods of temporary vacancies, the majority of its members should be independent. For the purposes of this mandate, “independent” means the standard of independence applicable to audit committee members as set out in National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees, as amended from time to time.
In all cases, the determination of whether a director is independent must be made by the Board in accordance with applicable securities laws and stock exchange rules. Generally, an independent director means a director who has no direct or indirect material relationship with the Corporation. For these purposes, “material relationship” means a relationship which could, in the view of the Board, reasonably interfere with the exercise of a member’s independent judgment.
In making a determination regarding a director’s independence, the Board will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including the director’s commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships, and such other criteria as the Board may determine from time to time.
The Board will review the independence of all directors on an annual basis and will disclose its determinations annually. To facilitate this review, directors will be asked to provide the Board with full information regarding their business and other relationships with the Corporation and its affiliates and with senior management and their affiliates. Directors have an ongoing obligation to inform the Board of any material changes in their circumstances or relationships which may affect the Board’s determination as to their independence.
(c) Board Size
The Board is of the view that a size of between 8 and 11 members is conducive to effective decision-making and committee work.
(d) Retirement
Directors may serve on the Board until the annual meeting of the Corporation next following their 75th birthday, and may not be re-elected after reaching age 75, unless this requirement has been waived by the Board, or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, for a valid reason.
(e) Term
All directors are elected at the annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation for a term of one year.
(f) Board Succession
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for maintaining a Board succession plan that is responsive to the Corporation’s needs and the interests of its shareholders.
(g) Service on Other Boards
The Board does not believe that its members should be prohibited from serving on the boards of other public companies so long as these commitments do not materially interfere with and are not incompatible with their ability to fulfill their duties as a member of the Board. Directors must advise the Chair in advance of accepting an invitation to serve on the board of another public company.
5. BOARD DUTIES
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Board is, among other matters, responsible for the following matters:
| (a) | selection, appointment, evaluation and, if necessary, termination of the Chief Executive Officer; |
| (b) | satisfying itself as to the integrity of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior officers of the Corporation and as to the culture of integrity throughout the Corporation; |
| (c) | succession planning, including appointing, counseling and monitoring the performance of executive officers; |
| (d) | human resources policies of the Corporation in general, including in particular the approval of the compensation of executive officers; |
A-2
| (e) | adoption of a strategic planning process, approval of strategic plans and monitoring corporate performance against those plans; | |
| (f) | approval of periodic capital and operating plans and monitoring corporate performance against those plans; | |
| (g) | policies and processes to identify the Corporation’s principal business risks, including hedging policies for the Corporation, and to confirm that systems are in place to mitigate these risks where prudent to do so; | |
| (h) | policies to confirm ethical behaviour of the Corporation and its employees, and compliance with laws and regulations; | |
| (i) | policies and processes to satisfy itself as to the integrity of the Corporation’s internal control and management information systems and its financial reporting; | |
| (j) | assessment of the effectiveness of the Board and its committees; | |
| (k) | confirming that an appropriate orientation program is in place for new directors and that continuing education opportunities are available for all directors; | |
| (l) | definition of the duties and the limits of authority of senior management, including approving a position description for the Chief Executive Officer; | |
| (m) | communications policy of the Corporation; | |
| (n) | health and safety and environmental policies and ensuring the implementation of systems to comply with these policies and all relevant laws and regulations; | |
| (o) | policies on corporate social responsibility and sustainable development and oversight of management’s efforts to implement the policies in the jurisdictions where it operates; | |
| (p) | oversight of the estimation of reserves by management; | |
| (q) | corporate governance including the relationship of the Board to management and confirming that the Corporation has appropriate structures and procedures in place to permit the Board to effectively discharge its duties and responsibilities; | |
| (r) | calling meetings of shareholders and submission to the shareholders of any question or matter requiring approval of the shareholders; | |
| (s) | approval of directors for nomination and election and recommendation of the auditors to be appointed at shareholders’ meetings and filling a vacancy among the directors or in the office of the auditor; | |
| (t) | issuance of securities of the Corporation; | |
| (u) | declaration of dividends and establishment of the dividend policy for the Corporation; | |
| (v) | approval of the annual audited financial statements, management proxy circulars, takeover bid circulars, directors’ circulars, prospectuses, annual information forms and other disclosure documents required to be approved by the directors of a corporation under securities laws, regulations or rules of any applicable stock exchange; | |
| (w) | adoption, amendment or repeal of by-laws of the Corporation; | |
| (x) | review and approval of material transactions not in the ordinary course of business; and | |
| (y) | other corporate decisions required to be made by the Board, or as may be reserved by the Board, to be made by itself, from time to time and not otherwise delegated to a committee of the Board or to the management of the Corporation. |
| 6. | DELEGATION TO MANAGEMENT |
The Board may delegate by resolution, from time to time, financial authority to the Chief Executive Officer (who may sub-delegate such authority to others within the Corporation as appropriate).
A-3
| 7. | CHAIR |
| (a) | Appointment |
The Board will in each year appoint from among its members a Chair. The Chair of the Board shall be an independent director unless the Board concludes that the best interests of the Corporation would be otherwise better served. If such Chair is not independent, then the independent directors shall appoint a Lead Director who shall be independent.
| (b) | General |
The Chair is principally responsible for overseeing the operations and affairs of the Board.
| (c) | Specific Role and Responsibilities |
The Chair will (subject to the responsibilities of the Lead Director as set out in Section 8, if Chair is not independent):
| o | lead, manage and organize the Board, consistent with the approach to corporate governance adopted by the Board from time to time; | |
| o | preside as chair at all meetings of the Board and shareholders; | |
| o | set the agenda of the board and shareholders’ meetings, in consultation with the Corporate Secretary and the Chief Executive Officer; | |
| o | confirm that appropriate procedures are in place to allow the Board to work effectively and efficiently and to function independently from management; | |
| o | confirm that Board functions are delegated to appropriate committees and that the functions are carried out and the results reported to the Board; | |
| o | together with the Chief Executive Officer, approach potential candidates for Board membership, once candidates have been identified and selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, to explore their interest in joining the Board; | |
| o | serve as an ex officio member of all Board committees, provided that if the Chair is not independent, he or she will not serve as a member of any committee required to be composed entirely of independent directors; | |
| o | act as a liaison between the Board and senior management, encouraging effective communication between the Board and the Chief Executive Officer; | |
| o | consistent with encouraging effective communication between the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, confirm that the Board and senior management understand their respective responsibilities and respect the boundary between them; | |
| o | chair Board meetings, including requiring appropriate briefing materials to be delivered in a timely fashion, stimulating debate, providing adequate time for discussion of issues, facilitating consensus, encouraging full participation and discussion by individual directors and confirming that clarity regarding decisions is reached and accurately recorded; | |
| o | confirm proper and timely documentary filings and fulfillment of disclosure requirements to statutory authorities under applicable legislation, including working with the Corporation’s external counsel and other outside advisors when necessary; | |
| o | confirm that the Board and its committees have the necessary resources to carry out their responsibilities, in particular, timely and relevant information; | |
| o | work with the Chief Executive Officer, the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Corporate Secretary to further the creation of a healthy governance culture within the Corporation; | |
| o | at the request of the Chief Executive Officer, represent the Corporation to shareholders and external stakeholders, including local community groups, aboriginals, government, and non-governmental organizations; and | |
| o | perform additional duties requested by the Board. |
A-4
| 8. | LEAD DIRECTOR |
| (a) | Appointment |
A Lead Director appointed pursuant to Section 7(a), shall have the responsibilities outlined in Section 8(b) below.
| (b) | Specific Role and Responsibilities |
| o | coordinate the activities of the independent directors; | |
| o | preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chair is not present, including meetings of independent directors and communicate the results of such meetings to the Chair and Chief Executive Officer as appropriate; | |
| o | call meetings of the independent directors, as appropriate; | |
| o | serve as liaison between the Chair, Chief Executive Officer and the independent directors; | |
| o | review the agenda for Board meetings to ensure that the agenda enables the Board to successfully carry out its duties and that the Board has sufficient time for discussion of all agenda matters; | |
| o | serve as an independent leadership contact for all independent directors consistent with the approach to corporate governance adopted by the Board from time to time; | |
| o | correspond or meet, if needed, with shareholders or other stakeholders regarding communications directed to the independent directors of the Board and coordinate with others as appropriate with respect to independent directors matters; | |
| o | provide support to the Chair, Chief Executive Officer, the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Corporate Secretary, as needed, to further the creation of a healthy governance culture within the Corporation; and | |
| o | perform such other duties as the Board may from time to time delegate to assist the Board in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. |
| (c) | General |
If the Lead Director has a conflict of interest, the Vice Chair shall serve as the Lead Director with respect to matters concerning any conflict of interest.
| 9. | VICE CHAIR |
| (a) | Appointment |
The Board may appoint from among its members a Vice Chair. The Vice Chair of the Board shall be an independent director and may be appointed as Lead Director.
| (b) | Specific Role and Responsibilities |
The Vice Chair will:
| o | serve as Chair of the Special Committee and, as appropriate, call meetings and coordinate the activities of the Special Committee; | |
| o | perform such other duties and responsibilities as assigned by the Board from time to time to assist the Board in the fulfillment of its responsibilities; | |
| o | assist the Chair of the Board in performing his or her duties and responsibilities and shall perform all the duties and responsibilities of the Chair of the Board during his or her absence or inability to act, including, but not limited to, presiding over all meetings of the Board at which the Chair is not present and communicating the results of such meetings to the Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate; | |
| o | provide support to the Chair, the Chief Executive Officer and the Board with respect to certain strategic matters, as needed; and | |
| o | provide strategic support and institutional knowledge to the Chair, the Chief Executive Officer and the Board with respect to all matters related to dealings with the Kyrgyz Republic. |
| 10. | CORPORATE SECRETARY |
| (a) | Appointment |
The Board will appoint an individual to act as the Corporate Secretary.
| (b) | General |
The Corporate Secretary is responsible for assisting the Chair in managing the operations and affairs of the Board and for performing additional duties requested by the Chair or the Board or any of its committees.
A-5
| (c) | Specific Role and Responsibilities |
The Corporate Secretary will:
| o | oversee the preparation of all materials for shareholders which relate to the election of directors or the matters discussed in these guidelines; | |
| o | confirm that all notices and materials are delivered to shareholders and directors in a timely manner; | |
| o | confirm that all minutes of meetings of shareholders, the Board and committees are accurately recorded; | |
| o | confirm proper and timely documentary filings and fulfilment of disclosure requirements to statutory authorities under applicable legislation, including working with the Corporation’s external counsel and other outside advisors, when necessary; | |
| o | maintain the Corporation’s books and records and oversee the security and application of the corporate seal; | |
| o | administer the operations of the Board and its committees; | |
| o | act as Secretary at annual meetings of shareholders; | |
| o | monitor compliance with the governance policies of the Board, including those regarding frequency and conduct of Board meetings, reporting information and other policies relating to the Board’s business; and | |
| o | perform additional duties requested by the Chair or the Board or any of its committees. |
| 11. | BOARD COMMITTEES |
| (a) | General |
The Board carries out its responsibilities directly and through the following committees and such other committees as it may establish from time to time: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, the Operations and Sustainability Committee and the Risk Committee.
| (b) | Chair |
The Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, the Sustainable Operations Committee and the Risk Committee are each chaired by a director who is selected by the Board on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and is responsible for determining the agenda and the frequency and conduct of meetings.
| (c) | Charters |
Each committee has its own charter which sets out its responsibilities and duties, qualifications for membership, procedures for committee member removal and appointment and reporting to the Board. On an annual basis, each committee’s charter is reviewed by both the committee itself and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and is also reviewed and approved by the Board. Copies of each charter are posted on the Corporation’s website and printed copies will be made available to any shareholder upon request. Below is a brief description of the responsibilities of each committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to the integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements; the Corporation’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements (other than with respect to health, safety and the environment); compliance with the Code of Ethics Policy; the qualifications and independence of the Corporation’s external auditors; the design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls; management of financial risks as delegated by the Board, including oversight of hedging activities; related party transactions; the performance of the Corporation’s internal audit function; and any additional matters delegated to the Audit Committee by the Board.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to the Corporation’s overall approach to corporate governance; the size, composition and structure of the Board and its committees; the identification and recommendation to the Board of qualified individuals for appointment to the Board and its committees; orientation and continuing education for directors; matters involving conflicts of interest of directors; and any additional matters delegated to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by the Board.
A-6
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for supporting the Board in making recommendations in regard to its oversight responsibilities and to review and, at its discretion, approve certain recommendations proposed by management. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews and recommends to the Board the selection and appointment of officers of the Corporation; the compensation philosophy, competitive positioning and competitive objectives in the market all of which drive the design of components and administration; the compensation and employment agreement of the CEO as recommended by the Chairman of the Board and by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee; grants of stock options to eligible participants; succession planning pertaining to all executive officers, based on recommendations of the chair of the board and the CEO; and any additional matters delegated to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee by the Board. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee oversees and approves the compensation and employment agreements of the direct reports to the CEO as reviewed and recommended by the Chairman of the Board; the objectives and design of the compensation program of the Corporation consistent with the compensation philosophy, competitive positioning and competitive objectives approved by the Board (these objectives and designs, along with their components and descriptions/plans, will satisfy the goal of providing sufficient competitive compensation to attract, retain and motivate senior management to maximize shareholder value); major human resources policies recommended by the CEO; diversity, equity and inclusion matters; management’s recommendation on annual merit increases consistent with the budget approved by the Board; special recognition payments under the CEO Awards Program which are recommended to be $50,000 or greater; and the administration of all equity-based compensation plans, subject to reporting to the Board. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee oversees and approves the compensation arrangements for Board members.
Operations and Sustainability Sustainable Operations
The Sustainable Operations Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities on matters relating to safety, health, environment, corporate social responsibility and reserves including the establishment of, and review of compliance with, appropriate safety, health and environment and corporate social responsibility policies and programs, receiving reports from management and reviewing budgets, reviewing the Corporation’s designated qualified persons for estimation of reserves and resources, receiving updates from management on key operational and technical issues, reviewing the Corporation’s publication of new reserve and resource information and annual reserve statements, and reviewing annual reconciliation of reserve and resource information to mine production.
Risk Committee
The Risk Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in relation to the policies, processes and systems for the identification, assessment and management of the Corporation’s principal strategic, financial, and operational risks including: (i) overseeing that the executive team has in place a process designed to identify and assess the key risks that the organization faces and has established an appropriate mechanism designed to address those risks; (ii) overseeing, in conjunction with other Board-level committees or the full Board, significant or critical risks, including strategic, financial and operational risks; and (iii) overseeing the division of risk-related responsibilities to each Board committee as clearly as possible and analyze to determine that the oversight of any significant or critical risks is not overlooked. Where practical, the Risk Committee is expected to include least one member from each of the other standing committees.
| 12. | BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS |
| (a) | Scheduling |
Board meetings are scheduled in advance at appropriate intervals throughout the year. In addition to regularly scheduled Board meetings, additional Board meetings may be called upon proper notice at any time to address specific needs of the Corporation. The Board may also take action from time to time by unanimous written consent. A Board meeting may be called by the Chair, the Chief Executive Officer or any two directors.
A-7
Each committee meets as often as it determines is necessary to fulfill its responsibilities. A meeting of any committee may be called by the committee chair, the Chair, the Chief Executive Officer or any two committee members.
Board meetings are held at a location determined by the Chair and meetings of each committee are held at a location determined by the committee chair.
| (b) | Notice |
Notice of the time and place of each meeting of the Board or any committee must be given to each director either by personal delivery, electronic mail, facsimile or other electronic means not less than 48 hours before the time of the meeting or by mail not less than 96 hours before the date of the meeting. Board or committee meetings may be held at any time without notice if all of the directors or committee members have waived or are deemed to have waived notice of the meeting. A director participating in a Board or committee meeting is deemed to have waived notice of the meeting.
| (c) | Agenda |
The Chair establishes the agenda for each Board meeting in consultation with the Corporate Secretary and the Chief Executive Officer. Any director may propose the inclusion of items on the agenda, request the presence of or a report by any member of senior management, or at any Board meeting raise subjects that are not on the agenda for that meeting.
Committee chairs establish the agenda for each committee meeting. Any committee member may propose the inclusion of items on the agenda, request the presence of or a report by any member of senior management, or at any committee meeting raise subjects that are not on the agenda for the meeting.
The Corporate Secretary distributes an agenda and meeting materials in advance of each Board or committee meeting to allow Board or committee members, as the case may be, sufficient time to review and consider the matters to be discussed.
| (d) | Non-Management Sessions |
Non-management directors meet separately at every Board meeting without management present. The Chair informs management of the substance of these meetings to the extent that action is required by them.
| (e) | Distribution of Information |
The Board regularly receives reports on the financial results and operating activities of the Corporation, as well as periodic reports on certain non-operational matters, including, corporate governance, insurance, pensions and treasury matters and safety, health and environmental matters.
| (f) | Attendance and Participation |
Each director is expected to attend all meetings of the Board and any committee of which he or she is a member. A director who is unable to attend a Board or committee meeting in person may participate by telephone or teleconference.
| (g) | Quorum |
A quorum for any Board meeting is a majority of directors.
A quorum for any committee meeting is a majority of its members.
| (h) | Voting and Approval |
At Board or committee meetings, each director or member, as applicable, is entitled to one vote and questions are decided by a majority of votes. In case of an equality of votes, the chair of the meeting does not have a second or casting vote.
| (i) | Procedures |
Procedures for Board meetings are determined by the Chair unless otherwise determined by the by-laws of the Corporation or a resolution of the Board.
A-8
Procedures for committee meetings are determined by the chair of the committee unless otherwise determined by the by-laws of the Corporation or a resolution of the committee or the Board.
| (j) | Corporate Secretary |
The Corporate Secretary acts as secretary to the Board and each of its committees. In the absence of the Corporate Secretary, or at the election of the Board or committee, as the case may be, the Board or a committee may appoint any other person to act as secretary.
| (k) | Minutes of Meetings |
The Corporate Secretary keeps minutes of the proceedings of the Board and each of its committees, and circulates copies of the minutes to each Board or committee member, as the case may be, on a timely basis.
| 13. | DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
The Board believes that compensation for directors should be competitive with the compensation paid to directors of comparable companies. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews directors’ compensation at least bi-annually with this criterion in mind and makes recommendations to the Board.
Directors who are employees of the Corporation or any of its affiliates do not receive any compensation for service as directors.
To further align the interests of directors with those of other shareholders, directors are paid a portion of their fees in deferred share units and restricted share units.
Directors are reimbursed by the Corporation for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as directors.
| 14. | SHARE OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS |
Directors are required, within five years of their initial appointment to the Board, to acquire and hold deferred share units, restricted share units, common shares or any other equity-based awards of the Corporation designated by the Board from time to time, with a value equal to at least three times the amount of their annual retainer for service as a director (excluding travel, meeting and committee chair fees) such value to be determined at the greater of cost or market value of such securities.
| 15. | DIRECTOR ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION |
New directors receive orientation materials describing the Corporation’s business and its corporate governance policies and procedures. New directors also have meetings with the Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for confirming that procedures are in place and resources are made available to provide directors with appropriate continuing education opportunities.
| 16. | BOARD ACCESS TO MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS |
Directors have access to members of management and are encouraged to raise any questions or concerns directly with management. The Board and its committees may invite any member of management, outside advisor or other person to attend any of their meetings.
The Board and any of its committees may retain an outside advisor at the expense of the Corporation at any time and have the authority to determine the advisor’s fees and other retention terms. Individual directors may retain an outside advisor at the expense of the Corporation with the approval of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
| 17. | PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the effectiveness of the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities and duties as set out in these guidelines.
In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the effectiveness of all Board committees in fulfilling their responsibilities and duties as set out in their charter and in a manner consistent with these guidelines.
A-9
In coordination with the Chair, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates individual directors to assess their suitability for nomination for re-election.
| 18. | CODES OF ETHICS |
The Board expects all directors, officers and employees of the Corporation to conduct themselves in accordance with the highest ethical standards.
The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics for employees which addresses, among other things, avoidance of conflicts of interest, protection of confidential information, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, adherence to good disclosure practices and procedures for employees and third parties to report concerns with respect to accounting and auditing matters. As set out in the Code, an employee who, in good faith, reports a concern regarding accounting matters or a suspected breach of the Code is protected from reprisal, such as dismissal, demotion, suspension, threats, harassment or discrimination.
The Board has also adopted a Code of Ethics for directors which sets out the ethical standards that apply to directors in the exercise of their duties.
Both Codes are posted on the Corporation’s website and are available in print to any shareholder who requests a copy.
| 19. | INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE |
In accordance with the by-laws of the Corporation, directors and officers are each indemnified by the Corporation against all liability and costs arising out of any action or suit against them from the execution of their duties, provided that they have carried out their duties honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Corporation and have otherwise complied with the provisions of applicable corporate law.
The Corporation maintains insurance for the benefit of its directors and officers against any liability incurred by them for which they would be indemnified. The amount and terms of the insurance coverage are dependent upon prevailing market conditions and practices with the objective of adequately protecting directors and officers from such liability.
| 20. | CONFLICTS OF INTEREST |
Each director is required to inform the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of any conflict of interest he or she may have with the Corporation. If a director has a personal interest in a matter before the Board or a committee, he or she must not participate in any vote on the matter except where the Board or the committee has expressly determined that it is appropriate for him or her to do so.
| 21. | CONTACT BOARD AND COMMITTEES |
The Board welcomes input and comments from shareholders of the Corporation. You may contact one or more members of the Board or its committees, by writing to the Corporate Secretary at:
Board of Directors of Centerra Gold Inc.
c/o Corporate Secretary
Centerra Gold Inc.
Suite 1500 – 1 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2P1
A-10

If you have any questions or require any assistance in executing your proxy or voting instruction form, please call Morrow Sodali at:
North American Toll-Free Number: 1.888.999.2944
Outside North America, Banks, Brokers and Collect Calls: 1.289.695.3075
Email: assistance@morrowsodali.com
North American Toll-Free Facsimile: 1.877.218.5372
CENTERRA GOLD INC.
1 University Avenue, Suite 1500
Toronto, ON M5J 2P1
P:1.416.204.1953 | E: info@centerragold.com
Download the latest about Centerra Gold Inc. at: http://www.centerragold.com
Centerra Gold Inc. is traded on the TSX under the symbol CG and on the NYSE under the symbol CGAU.
Exhibit 99.2
NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholder:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the annual general meeting of the shareholders (the “Meeting”) of Centerra Gold Inc. (“Centerra”) will be held on September 22, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) in order for shareholders of Centerra to:
| 1. | receive the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the auditors’ report thereon; |
| 2. | elect directors of Centerra for the ensuing year; |
| 3. | re-appoint auditors for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix the remuneration to be paid to the auditors; |
| 4. | consider, and if deemed advisable, approve, a non-binding advisory resolution to accept Centerra’s approach to executive compensation; and |
| 5. | transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof. |
Similar to last year, and in light of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic and to permit a greater number of shareholders to attend the Meeting, Centerra will hold the Meeting in a virtual only format, which will be conducted via live audio webcast at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739. At this website, shareholders will have an equal opportunity to attend, participate and vote their shares at the Meeting, regardless of geographic location. Shareholders will not be able to physically attend the Meeting.
Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders will be able to attend, participate and vote at the Meeting online. Non-registered shareholders (being shareholders who beneficially own shares that are registered in the name of an intermediary such as a bank, trust company, securities broker or other nominee, or in the name of a depository of which the intermediary is a participant) who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholder will be able to attend the Meeting online as guests, but guests will not be able to vote or ask questions at the Meeting.
A Centerra shareholder who wishes to appoint a person other than the Centerra proxyholders identified on the form of proxy or voting instruction form accompanying this notice (including a non-registered shareholder who wishes to appoint themselves as proxyholder in order to attend and vote at the Meeting online) must carefully follow the instructions in the management information circular and on their form of proxy or voting instruction form accompanying this notice. These instructions include the additional step of registering such proxyholder with our transfer agent, TSX Trust Company (“TSX Trust”), after submitting a form of proxy or voting instruction form. Failure to register will result in the proxyholder not receiving a Control Number, which is used as their online sign-in credentials and is required for them to vote at the Meeting. Without a Control Number, such proxyholder will only be able to attend the Meeting online as a guest. Non-registered shareholders located in the United States must also provide TSX Trust with a duly completed legal proxy if they wish to vote at the Meeting or appoint a third party as their proxyholder.
The Board of Directors of Centerra has fixed the close of business on August 19, 2022 as the record date to determine which shareholders are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
| BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | |
| (signed) “Yousef Rehman” | |
| Yousef Rehman | |
| Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | |
| Toronto, Ontario, Canada | |
| August 19, 2022 |
Exhibit 99.3
![]() |
F O R M O F P R O X Y for the |
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF MANAGEMENT
OF CENTERRA GOLD INC.
The undersigned shareholder of Centerra Gold Inc. (the “Corporation”) hereby appoints Michael Parrett, Chair of the board of directors of the Corporation, or failing him, Scott Perry, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, or instead of any of the foregoing , as proxy of the undersigned, to attend, vote and act for and on behalf of the undersigned at the annual general meeting of shareholders of the Corporation to be held on September 22, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto Time) in a virtual-only format via live audio webcast at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739, or any postponement or adjournment thereof, in the same manner, to the same extent and with the same powers as if the undersigned were personally present, upon the following matters and in accordance with the following directions.
Note: If you are appointing a proxyholder other than the representatives of management of the Corporation whose names are printed above, YOU MUST: Step 1: Return your proxy to TSX Trust Company (“TSX Trust”) AND Step 2: Register your proxyholder by contacting TSX Trust at 1-866-751-6315 (within North America) or 212-235-5754 (outside North America) or by internet at https://www.tsxtrust.com/control-number-request, and provide TSX Trust with the required information for your proxyholder so that TSX Trust may provide the proxyholder with a Control Number. This Control Number will allow your proxyholder to log in to and vote at the Meeting online. Requests for a Control Number must be received by TSX Trust by 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on September 20, 2022. WITHOUT A CONTROL NUMBER, YOUR PROXYHOLDER WILL NOT BE ABLE TO VOTE OR ASK QUESTIONS AT THE MEETING. THEY WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING ONLINE AS A GUEST. See the accompanying management information circular for further information regarding appointing a third party proxyholder.
VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS ARE INDICATED BY HIGHLIGHTED TEXT OVER THE BOXES.
The undersigned specifies that all of the voting shares owned by him or her and represented by this form of proxy shall be:
| (1) | ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | |||||
| For | Against | For | Against | |||
| Richard W. Connor | Sheryl K. Pressler | |||||
| Wendy Kei | Bruce V. Walter | |||||
| Michael S. Parrett | Paul N. Wright | |||||
| Jacques Perron | Susan L. Yurkovich | |||||
| Scott G. Perry | ||||||
| (2) | APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS | For | Withhold | |||
| To approve the appointment of KPMG LLP as the auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and to authorize the directors of the Corporation to fix the remuneration to be paid to the auditors. | ||||||
| (3) | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | For | Against | |||
| To approve a non-binding advisory resolution to accept the Corporation’s approach to executive compensation. | ||||||
I/We authorize you to act in accordance with my/our instructions set out above. I/We hereby revoke any proxy previously given with respect to the meeting. If no voting instructions are indicated above, this proxy will be voted as recommended by Management.
| Dated: , 2022. | ||
|
Name of Shareholder (Please print as registered) |
Signature of Shareholder |
1
NOTES:
| (1) | The individuals named in this proxy are representatives of management of the Corporation and are the Chair and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, respectively. You have the right to appoint another person or company to represent you at the meeting. If you wish to appoint someone else to represent you at the meeting, insert that other person’s name in the blank space set out above in this form of proxy or by completing another proper form of proxy. The person you appoint to represent you at the meeting need not be a shareholder of the Corporation. Note: If you are appointing a proxyholder other than the persons whose names are printed above and who are appointed by the management of the Corporation, YOU MUST return your proxy to TSX Trust AND register your proxyholder by contacting TSX Trust at 1-866-751-6315 (within North America) or 212-235-5754 (outside North America), and provide TSX Trust with the required information for your proxyholder so that TSX Trust may provide the proxyholder with a Control Number. Requests for a Control Number must be received by TSX Trust by 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on September 22, 2022. This Control Number will allow your proxyholder to log in to and vote at the Meeting online. Without a Control Number, your proxyholder will not be able to vote or ask questions at the meeting. They will only be able to attend the meeting online as a guest. |
| (2) | To be valid, this proxy must be signed and deposited with the Corporation’s transfer agent, TSX Trust no later than 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on September 22, 2022, 2022 or, if the Meeting is postponed or adjourned, on a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or holiday which is at least 48 hours before the time of such reconvened meeting. Late proxies may be accepted or rejected by the Chair of the meeting at his sole discretion; the Chair of the meeting is under no obligation to accept or reject a late proxy. The Chair of the meeting may extend or waive the proxy cut-off time in his discretion and without notice. |
| (3) | If shares are registered in the name of an individual, please sign exactly as your shares are registered. |
If the shareholder is a corporation, this proxy must be executed by a duly authorized officer or attorney of the shareholder and, if the corporation has a corporate seal, its corporate seal should be affixed.
If shares are registered in the name of an executor, administrator or trustee, please sign exactly as the shares are registered. If the shares are registered in the name of the deceased or other shareholder, the shareholder’s name must be printed in the space provided, the proxy must be signed by the legal representative with his/her name printed below his/her signature and evidence of authority to sign on behalf of the shareholder must be attached to this proxy.
If shares are registered in the name of two or more persons, then all those persons should sign this proxy.
All registered owners of shares should refer to the accompanying management information circular for further information regarding completion and use of this proxy and other information pertaining to the meeting.
| (4) | If this proxy is not dated in the space provided, it is deemed to bear the date on which it is mailed by management of the Corporation. |
| (5) | The shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the shareholder; however, if such a specification is not made in respect of any matter, this proxy will be voted FOR such matters by the representatives of management of the Corporation or, if you appoint another proxyholder, as that other proxyholder sees fit. |
HOW TO VOTE
Vote Online:
At www.tsxtrust.com/vote-proxy where you will enter your 13 digit control number located on this proxy. You may also appoint a person other than the persons designated on this form of proxy by following the instructions provided on the website.
Vote by Telephone:
Call toll free 1-888-489-5760 and follow the voice instructions. To vote by telephone you will need the 13 digit control number located on this proxy. If you vote by telephone, please do not return this proxy.
Vote by Mail, Fax or Email:
| · | Complete and return your signed proxy in the envelope provided and send to: |
TSX Trust Company
Attn: Proxy Department
P.O. Box 721
Agincourt, ON M1S 0A1
Canada
| · | Fax (both sides of proxy form) to: 416-368-2502 or toll free North America to: 1-866-781-3111 |
| · | Scan and email (both sides of the proxy form) to proxyvote@tmx.com |
Vote at the Meeting:
At the time of the Meeting, eligible registered shareholders or proxyholders may log in at https://web.lumiagm.com/489253739 click on “I have a login” and enter the 13-digit control number found on the proxy accompanying this notice. The generic password to be entered is “centerra2022” (case sensitive).
Proxies must be received by September 20, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) or, if the Meeting is postponed or adjourned, on a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or holiday which is at least 48 hours before the time of such reconvened meeting.
2
Exhibit 99.4
CENTERRA GOLD INC.
(the “Corporation”)
CERTIFICATE OF OFFICER
| TO: | The Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities in each of the Provinces and Territories of Canada |
| RE: | Abridgement of time pursuant to National Instrument 54-101 – Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer (“NI 54-101”) |
| DATE: | August 26, 2022 |
The undersigned, Yousef Rehman, the duly appointed Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Corporation, hereby certifies for and on behalf of the Corporation and not in his personal capacity, intending that the same may be relied upon by you without further inquiry, that the Corporation is relying on section 2.20 of NI 54-101 pertaining to the abridgement of time prescribed by subsections 2.2(1) and 2.5(1) of NI 54-101 and the requirements set forth in section 2.20 have been complied with. Specifically:
| (a) | the Corporation has arranged to have proxy-related materials for the annual general meeting of the holders of common shares of the Corporation to be held on September 22, 2022 to be sent in compliance with the timing requirements in sections 2.9 and 2.12 of NI 54-101; |
| (b) | the Corporation has arranged to carry out all of the requirements in NI 54-101 in addition to those described in paragraph (a) above; and |
| (c) | the Corporation is relying upon section 2.20 of NI 54-101. |
[Signature page follows]
DATED as of the date first written above.
| (signed) “Yousef Rehman” | |
| Yousef Rehman | |
| Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | |
Exhibit 99.5
| STRONG RESILIENT ON-TRACK CENTERRA GOLD INC. ANNUAL REPORT 2021 410_FINAL_OK_pre-press_August 12_445 pm_CenterraAR_2021 2022-08-15 7:41 PM Page 2 |
| NAV by Asset* Exploration & Other 6% Kemess 8% Mount Milligan 28% Cash & Equivalents 28% Öksüt 30% Corporate Profile Centerra Gold Inc. is a Canadian-based gold mining company focused on operating, developing, exploring and acquiring gold and copper properties in North America, Turkey, and other markets worldwide. Centerra operates two mines: the Mount Milligan Mine in British Columbia, Canada, and the Öksüt Mine in Turkey. The Company also owns the Goldfield District Project in Nevada, United States, the Kemess Underground Project in British Columbia, Canada, and owns and operates the Molybdenum Business Unit in the United States. Centerra's shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) under the symbol CG and on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol CGAU. The Company is based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements Forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. For a detailed discussion of such risks and other factors, see the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) included in this Annual Report, see page 1 of the MD&A, and the Company’s most recent Annual Information Form, which is available on SEDAR. All dollar amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars in this report, except as otherwise indicated. Information is given as of December 31, 2021. STRONG RESILIENT ON-TRACK At Centerra, we know our strength lies in our assets as well as our team. That is why we continue to grow our low-cost operating profile, invest in a collaborative and inclusive workplace, and encourage the development of diverse skills and talent throughout our business. 308,141 OZ/AU 73.3 M LBS/CU Mount Milligan achieved record cash generation and throughput in 2021. Mount Milligan Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 Annual Consolidated Gold Production Costs & All-in Sustaining Costs on a By-product Basis1 ($ per ounces) Centerra remained on-track in 2021 and stayed the course despite its challenges. 1) All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC) is a Non-GAAP financial measures and ratios. See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section of the Company's Q4 MD&A (refer to pp. 43-45). 2) 2016 statistics and guidance excludes Mount Milligan (transaction closed in October 2016). Operating Statistics vs Guidance (mid-point) (koz Au) 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 20162 2015 520 537 540 551 795 785 685 730 748 783 780 824 290 308 ● Guidance (mid-point) ● Actual Gold Production (koz) 196,438 OZ/AU 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 687 360 754 464 718 465 708 615 649 604 ● AISC ($/oz) ● Gold Production Costs ($/oz) *Based on analyst consensus estimates as of December 31, 2021. Years 2015-2020 are inclusive of gold production from the Kumtor Mine. 410_FINAL_OK_pre-press_August 12_445 pm_CenterraAR_2021 2022-08-15 7:41 PM Page 3 |
| 2021 Corporate Highlights G Safety - Öksüt achieved two million work hours without a lost-time injury, Endako achieved eight years and the Thompson Creek Mine and Langeloth Facility each achieved one year without a lost-time injury. G Action Planning toward Climate Strategy Implementation in 2023. STRONG.RESILIENT. ON-TRACK. Öksüt replenished its production depletion with its 2021 R&R gold mineral estimates. Öksüt G All sites continued to maintain proactive COVID-19 measures with no material impact to our operations. G Continued progress on compliance with Responsible Gold Mining Principles (RGMP) Requirements. G Continued focus on lowering costs at the Öksüt Mine. 2021 Financial Highlights G 2021 consolidated production costs from continuing operations of $604/oz. G 2021 consolidated all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis1 $649/oz. G Quarterly dividend declared of C$0.07 per common share. G December 31, 2021 Debt-free balance sheet with cash balance of $947M and liquidity totaling $1,347M3. G Free cash flow by provided by operating activities of $112M from Öksüt Mine and $202M from Mount Milligan Mine. G Cash provided by operating activities of $132M from Öksüt Mine and $269M from Mount Milligan. 111,703 OZ/AU Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations of $270.9M and Free Cash Flow from continuing operations1 of $178.4M Gold Production Costs ($/oz) $457/oz Öksüt $683/oz Mount Milligan G FCF1 G Cash provided by operating activities 1) Non-GAAP financial measures and ratios. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” section of the Company’s Q4 MD&A (refer to pp. 43-45). 2) Mineral resources are in addition to mineral reserves. Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. 2021 figures exclude the impact of the loss of Kumtor mine. For more details see Company’s news release dated February 25, 2022. 3) Non-GAAP financial measure. Total liquidity is calculated as cash and cash equivalents and amount available under the corporate credit facility. 2021 Consolidated FCF1 & Cash Provided by Operating Activities (US$M) 2021 FCF from Mine Ops1 & Cash Provided by Mine Ops (US$M) Centerra Gold has a strong track record of beating gold production guidance. In 2021, Centerra recorded net earnings from continuing operations of $447M or $1.51 per common share (basic). Mount Milligan Öksüt Consolidated 202 269 112 132 178 271 178 2021 271 G Increased gold mineral resources at Mount Milligan Mine by ~1.4M oz. and copper mineral resources by 453M lbs at Mount Milligan Mine2. G FCF1 G Cash provided by operating activities 410_FINAL_OK_pre-press_August 12_445 pm_CenterraAR_2021 2022-08-15 7:41 PM Page 4 |
| STRONG.RESILIENT. ON-TRACK. CEO’S MESSAGE CENTERRA’S AIM IS TO MEANINGFULLY GROW our low-cost operating portfolio, while building a great place to work, with care and consideration for the environment and the communities in which the Company operates. Centerra aims to achieve this overall strategy through the following strategic imperatives: - Driving growth: Identifying, critically evaluating, and executing targeted growth opportunities to ensure the organization is best positioned for sustainable growth and value-creation. - Optimizing existing assets: Leveraging the Company’s existing operations with consistent performance, focusing on activities that generate the most value. - Creating a great place to work: Attracting, retaining, and developing diverse, skilled talent to create a collaborative and inclusive environment. - Improving the Company’s environmental social governance (“ESG”) profile: Maintaining and enhancing value for all of Centerra’s stakeholders by embedding ESG principles across the enterprise throughout the mine life cycle and by delivering on the Company’s targets. 2021 was a pivotal year for Centerra. As a result of our continued strong operational performance and low-cost operating profile, we have a strong debt-free balance sheet and significant cash on hand, empowering an internally funded business model. Our well-established record of delivering results speaks to the quality of our assets and gives us confidence in our outlook at our core operations and the bright path ahead. As always, health and safety remain our top priority. With the ongoing pandemic, we have maintained rigorous health protocols at all of our mines to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. We continue to provide vaccination clinics for all employees and contractors at our Mount Milligan and Öksüt mines, and the majority of our site employees have been vaccinated, with booster shots now available. Mount Milligan and Öksüt paved the way for our strong operating performance in 2021. Record performance at Mount Milligan and a strong first full calendar year of operations at Öksüt enabled us to achieve the upper end of our gold production guidance, producing more than 308,000 ounces at gold production costs of $604 per ounce and all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis1 of $649 per ounce sold, making our low-cost operating profile one of the most competitive amongst our peer group. STRONG. RESILIENT. ON-TRACK. Öksüt mine achieved two million work hours without a lost time injury in 2021. Copper production costs of $1.51/lb at Mount Milligan. Mount Milligan and Öksüt paved the way for our STRONG operating performance. 1) Non-GAAP financial measures and ratios. See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section of the Company's Q4 MD&A (refer to pp. 43-45). 410_FINAL_OK_pre-press_August 12_445 pm_CenterraAR_2021 2022-08-15 7:41 PM Page 5 |
| Mount Milligan throughput in 2021 was the highest since operations began in 2014. In 2021, gold production of 196,438 ounces was at the upper end of the guidance range, and copper production of 73.3 million pounds was within the guidance range, while gold production costs were $683 per ounce and an all-in-sustaining cost on a by-product basis1 of $508 per ounce were lower than the low end of its all-in-sustaining cost guidance. Öksüt favourably outperformed both its gold production and cost guidance, achieving 111,703 ounces of gold production at gold production costs of $457 per ounce and an all-in sustaining cost on a by-product basis 1 of $668 per ounce sold. Öksüt has generated more than US$200 million of positive free cash flow in less than two years of operation, already paying back the full cost of our investment. Financially, in 2021, Centerra recorded net earnings from continuing operations of $447 million or $1.51 per common share (basic). Company-wide, we generated $271 million in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations and $178 million of free cash flow from continuing operations1. We ended the year with a strong debt-free balance sheet including more than $1.3 billion of liquidity (cash of $947 million and an undrawn $400 million corporate credit facility). With respect to the Kumtor Mine, we are pleased to have closed the agreement to sell our business interests in the Kyrgyz Republic to Kyrgyzaltyn JSC and exit the country. We expect this transaction to provide considerable value to Centerra’s stakeholders while allowing us to move forward with a renewed focus on our core operations and commit our full attention and energy to the opportunities ahead. We remain committed to responsible mining and will continue to instill our ESG principles across the enterprise and throughout the mine life cycle to deliver on our targets. In 2021, we continued our focus on safety leadership training and awareness; we completed external assurance on our Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions at both Mount Milligan and Öksüt; and we continued to progress on our Year 2 Responsible Gold Mining Principles Requirements. In 2021, we were co-recipients, with Chu Cho Environmental, of the B.C. Mine Reclamation Award for our ongoing research into innovative techniques to solve reclamation, remediation and ecological restoration questions at Mount Milligan. Total liquidity2 $1,347M As at December 31, 2021 At Mount Milligan, life of mine planning work continues with a new technical report expected in 2022. Our focus on lowering costs at the Öksüt Mine continue. Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 We know our success depends on our RESILIENCE, ability to adapt and history of delivering sustainable value for all stakeholders. 1) Non-GAAP financial measures and ratios. See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section of the Company's Q4 MD&A (refer to pp. 43-45).7 2) Non-GAAP financial measure. Total liquidity is calculated as cash and cash equivalents and amount available under the corporate credit facility. 410_FINAL_OK_pre-press_August 12_445 pm_CenterraAR_2021 2022-08-15 7:41 PM Page 6 |
| We also recognize that the mining industry needs to be more diverse, and we are taking action to make important and lasting changes. We carried out a 15-month current state assessment and our Board of Directors set a target of 30% female representation on our workforce and among the executive officer group by 2026. As we look ahead, we will look to maximize our strengths with an eye toward sustainable growth and value creation. We will continue to invest in both greenfield and brownfield exploration, with increased drilling programs at Mount Milligan and Öksüt where we have seen promising results. Greenfield and generative exploration activities will focus on our existing properties and joint ventures in Canada, Turkey and the United States. In February 2022, we announced the acquisition of Gemfield Resources LLC., owner of the Goldfield District Project (“Goldfield”) in Nevada, USA. We are excited to be adding this high-quality development project and its substantial Tier 1 jurisdiction land package to our portfolio. Similar to our Öksüt Mine, Goldfield will be a heap leach mine, with low initial capital outlay and low projected production costs. Our exploration and operational teams have experience of an asset of this kind, and I feel confident that they will be able to successfully develop and execute on this project in the coming years, delivering another source of meaningful cash flow to Centerra. Given the current strength of our balance sheet together with our projected free cash flow in 2022, acquiring Goldfield leaves Centerra in a position of flexibility to deliver on other shareholder friendly capital return initiatives that will be under consideration over time. I am proud of our team and all that we have achieved together over the past year and look forward to successful years ahead. Scott G. Perry President and Chief Executive Officer STRONG.RESILIENT. ON-TRACK. We are ON-TRACK to bring our strategy & vision to fruition. ~32,000 m of brownfield exploration drilling at Öksüt in 2021. The Company has allocated ~$35-$45 million for exploration activities in 2022. The 2022 acquisition of Goldfield adds a high-quality, open-pit, heap-leach development project to Centerra’s portfolio. 410_FINAL_OK_pre-press_August 12_445 pm_CenterraAR_2021 2022-08-15 7:41 PM Page 7 |
| FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continuing operations basis, except as noted) 2021 2020 Cash and cash equivalents $ 947 $ 545 Total Assets $ 2,677 $ 3,136 Revenue $ 900 $ 721 Production costs $ 488 $ 410 Exploration $ 37 $ 47 Corporate Administration $ 26 $ 32 Earnings from mine operations $ 292 $ 216 Net earnings from continuing operations $ 447 $ 16 Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations (1) $ 149 $ 70 Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations $ (829) $ 392 Net earnings (loss) (2) $ (382) $ 409 Adjusted net earnings (1)(2) $ 234 $ 462 Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations $ 271 $ 272 Free cash flow from continuing operations (1) $ 178 $ 169 Adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations (1) $ 193 $ 169 Cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations $ 144 $ 658 Net cash flow from discontinued operations (3) $ 48 $ 429 Additions to property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) $ 119 $ 141 Capital expenditures - total (1) $ 93 $ 111 Sustaining capital expenditures (1) $ 88 $ 57 Non-sustaining capital expenditures (1) $5$ 54 Net earnings from continuing operations per common share - basic (4) $ 1.51 $ 0.05 Net earnings (loss) per common share - $/share basic (2)(4) $ (1.29) $ 1.39 Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations per common share - basic (1)(4) $ 0.50 $ 0.24 Adjusted net earnings per common share - $/share basic (1)(2)(4) $ 0.79 $ 1.57 Gold produced (oz) 308,141 267,923 Gold sold (oz) (5) 314,757 259,603 Copper produced (000s lbs) 73,275 82,816 Copper sold (000s lbs) 78,017 80,477 Gold production costs ($/oz) $ 604 $ 615 All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis ($/oz) (1) $ 649 $ 718 All-in costs on a by-product basis ($/oz) (1) $ 785 $ 1,116 Gold - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis ($/oz) (1) $ 891 $ 954 Average realized gold price ($/oz ) (6) $ 1,485 $ 1,508 Average realized copper price ($/lb) (6) $ 3.59 $ 2.92 1) Non-GAAP financial measures and ratios. See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section of the Company's Q4 MD&A (refer to pp. 43-45). 2) Inclusive of the results from the Kumtor Mine prior to the loss of control on May 15, 2021. 3) Calculated as the sum of cash flow provided by operating activities from discontinued operations, cash flow used in investing activities from discontinued operations and cash flow used in financing activities from discontinued operations. 4) As at December 31, 2021, the Company had 297,064,750 common shares issued and outstanding, of which 26.1% were held by Kyrgyzaltyn JSC. 5) Includes 6,654 ounces of gold in 2020, which were sold prior to achieving commercial production at the Öksüt Mine on May 31, 2020. 6) This supplementary financial measure within the meaning of 52-112 is calculated as a ratio of revenue from the consolidated financial statements and units of metal sold and includes the impact from the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement and the impact of copper hedges. FINANCIAL & OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 410_FINAL_OK_pre-press_August 12_445 pm_CenterraAR_2021 2022-08-15 7:41 PM Page 8 |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) has been prepared as of February 24, 2022 and is intended to provide a review of the financial position and results of operations of Centerra Gold Inc. (“Centerra” or the “Company”) for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2021 in comparison with the corresponding periods ended December 31, 2020. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2021 prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The Company’s audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2021, are available at www.centerragold.com and on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/ edgar. In addition, this discussion contains forward-looking information regarding Centerra’s business and operations. Such forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. See “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information” below. All dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars (“USD”), except as otherwise indicated. All references in this document denoted with NG indicate a “specified financial measure” within the meaning of National Instrument 52-112 Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures Disclosure of the Canadian Securities Administrators. None of these measures is a standardized financial measure under IFRS and these measures might not be comparable to similar financial measures disclosed by other issuers. See section “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” below for a discussion of the specified financial measures used in this document and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.
Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Information contained in this document which is not a statement of historical fact, and the documents incorporated by reference herein, may be “forward-looking information” for the purposes of Canadian securities laws and within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “contemplate”, “plan”, “intends”, “continue”, “budget”, “estimate”, “may”, “will”, “schedule”, “understand” and similar expressions identify forward-looking information. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things: statements regarding 2022 Outlook and 2022 Guidance, including outlook on production (including the timing thereof), cost, free cash flow and capital spend in 2022, and the assumptions used in preparing such guidance and outlook, including those discussed under “2022 Material Assumptions”; the impact of the seizure of the Kumtor Mine on the Company’s other operations and businesses; the outcome of arbitration and other proceedings initiated by the Company regarding the unlawful seizure by the Kyrgyz Government of the Kumtor Mine in May, 2021, or the outcome or effect of the legacy environmental and tax disputes and criminal investigations relating to the Kumtor Mine, or the outcome of any future discussions or negotiations to resolve any or all of the disputes relating to the Kumtor Mine and the potential terms and conditions (including legal and regulatory requirements and approvals in connection therewith) of any such resolution; possible impacts to its operations relating to COVID-19; the Company’s expectation regarding having sufficient water at Mount Milligan in the medium-term for its targeted throughput and its plans for a long-term water solution; the Company’s continued evaluation of potential activity at the Kemess East Project; expectations regarding the resources and reserves within the Keltepe and Güneytepe deposits in support of an updated resource model and new life-of-mine plan; expectations regarding the future joining of the Keltepe North and Keltepe Northwest deposits; the Company’s expectations regarding exploration results in connection with the Sivritepe Project and 2XFred Project; expectations in respect of the acquisition of Gemfield Resources LLC, owner of the Goldfield District Project (the “Goldfield Project”), including the completion and the anticipated benefits and strategic rationale of the transaction and future prospects in respect of the Goldfield Project; the Company’s expectations of adequate liquidity and capital resources for 2022; and, expectations regarding contingent payments to be received from the sale of Greenstone Partnership.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 1 |
Forward-looking information is necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Centerra, are inherently subject to significant technical, political, business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward- looking information. Factors and assumptions that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things: (A) strategic, legal, planning and other risks, including: political risks associated with the Company’s operations in Turkey, the USA and Canada; resource nationalism including the management of external stakeholder expectations; the impact of changes in, or to the more aggressive enforcement of, laws, regulations and government practices, including unjustified civil or criminal action against the Company, its affiliates, or its current or former employees; risks that community activism may result in increased contributory demands or business interruptions; the risks related to outstanding litigation affecting the Company, including the potential failure to negotiate a mutually-acceptable outcome of disputes relating to the Kumtor Mine and any negotiations or resolution between Centerra and the Kyrgyz Republic and the potential terms and conditions (including legal and regulatory requirements and approvals in connection therewith) of any such resolution; risks that an arbitrator will reject the Company’s claims against the Kyrgyz Republic and/or Kyrgyzaltyn JSC (“Kyrgyzaltyn”) or that such claims may not be practically enforceable against the Kyrgyz Republic and/or Kyrgyzaltyn; risks related to the continued imposition by the Kyrgyz Government of external management on the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Kumtor Gold Company CJSC (“KGC”) or the prolongation of such external management, including risks that the external manager materially damages the Kumtor Mine’s operations; the inability of the external management of KGC to obtain equipment, spare parts, consumables or other supplies; the Kyrgyz Republic Government taking further steps to nationalize or expropriate the Kumtor Mine, and/or utilizing the purported environmental and tax claims being asserted against KGC to strip KGC of its assets; the ongoing failure of the Kyrgyz Republic Government to comply with its continuing obligations under the investment agreements governing the Kumtor Mine and not take any expropriation action against the Kumtor Mine; risks that the Kyrgyz Government undertake further unjustified civil or criminal action against the Company, its affiliates, or its current or former employees; the impact of constitutional changes in Turkey; the impact of any sanctions imposed by Canada, the United States or other jurisdictions against various Russian and Turkish individuals and entities; potential defects of title in the Company’s properties that are not known as of the date hereof; the inability of the Company and its subsidiaries to enforce their legal rights in certain circumstances; the presence of a significant shareholder that is a state-owned company of the Kyrgyz Republic; risks related to anti-corruption legislation; Centerra not being able to replace mineral reserves; Indigenous claims and consultative issues relating to the Company’s properties which are in proximity to Indigenous communities; and potential risks related to kidnapping or acts of terrorism; completion of the acquisition of the Goldfield Project in accordance with, and on the timeline contemplated by, the terms and conditions of the relevant agreements in respect thereof, management’s assessment of the effects of the successful completion of the proposed acquisition of the Goldfield Project and the making of a determination to proceed with the development of the Goldfield Project on terms acceptable to Centerra; (B) risks relating to financial matters, including: sensitivity of the Company’s business to the volatility of gold, copper and other mineral prices; the use of provisionally-priced sales contracts for production at the Mount Milligan Mine; reliance on a few key customers for the gold- copper concentrate at the Mount Milligan Mine; use of commodity derivatives; the imprecision of the Company’s mineral reserves and resources estimates and the assumptions they rely on; the accuracy of the Company’s production and cost estimates; the impact of restrictive covenants in the Company’s credit facilities which may, among other things, restrict the Company from pursuing certain business activities or making distributions from its subsidiaries; changes to tax regimes; the Company’s ability to obtain future financing; the impact of global financial conditions; the impact of currency fluctuations; the effect of market conditions on the Company’s short-term investments; the Company’s ability to make payments, including any payments of principal and interest on the Company’s debt facilities, which depends on the cash flow of its subsidiaries; and (C) risks related to operational matters and geotechnical issues and the Company’s continued ability to successfully manage such matters, including the stability of the pit walls at the Company’s operations; the integrity of tailings storage facilities and the management thereof, including as to stability, compliance with laws, regulations, licenses and permits, controlling seepages and storage of water where applicable; the risk of having sufficient water to continue operations at the Mount Milligan Mine and achieve expected mill throughput; changes to, or delays in, transportation routes, including cessation or disruption in rail and shipping networks whether caused by decisions of third-party providers or force majeure events (including, but not limited to, flooding or COVID-19, respectively); the success of the Company’s future exploration and development activities, including the financial and political risks inherent in carrying out exploration activities; inherent risks associated with the use of sodium cyanide in the mining operations; the adequacy of the Company’s insurance to mitigate operational and corporate risks; mechanical breakdowns; the occurrence of any labour unrest or disturbance and the ability of the Company to successfully renegotiate collective agreements when required; the risk that Centerra’s workforce and operations may be exposed to widespread epidemic including, but not limited to, the COVID-19 pandemic; seismic activity; wildfires; long lead-times required for equipment and supplies given the remote location of some of the Company’s operating properties; reliance on a limited number of suppliers for certain consumables, equipment and components; the ability of the Company to address physical and transition risks from climate change and sufficiently manage stakeholder expectations on climate-related issues; the Company’s ability to accurately predict decommissioning and reclamation costs; the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; competition for mineral acquisition opportunities; risks associated with the conduct of joint ventures/partnerships; and, the Company’s ability to manage its projects effectively and to mitigate the potential lack of availability of contractors, budget and timing overruns and project resources. For additional risk factors, please see section titled “Risks Factors” in the Company’s most recently filed Annual Information Form (“AIF”) available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar.
There can be no assurances that forward-looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, as many factors and future events, both known and unknown could cause actual results, performance or achievements to vary or differ materially from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements contained herein or incorporated by reference. Accordingly, all such factors should be considered carefully when making decisions with respect to Centerra, and prospective investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is as of February 25, 2022. Centerra assumes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions, changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such forward-looking information, except as required by applicable law.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 2 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Overview | 4 |
| Overview of Consolidated Financial and Operational Highlights | 6 |
| Overview of Consolidated Results | 7 |
| Outlook | 9 |
| Recent Events and Developments | 14 |
| Risks That Can Affect Centerra's Business | 18 |
| Market Conditions | 20 |
| Financial Performance | 22 |
| Financial Instruments | 25 |
| Balance Sheet Review | 26 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 27 |
| Contractual Obligations | 28 |
| 2022 Liquidity and Capital Resources Analysis | 29 |
| Operating Mines and Facilities | 29 |
| Discontinued Operations | 40 |
| Quarterly Results – Previous Eight Quarters | 41 |
| Related Party Transactions | 41 |
| Accounting Estimates, Policies and Changes | 42 |
| Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting | 42 |
| Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures | 43 |
| Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources | 50 |
| Qualified Person & QA/QC – Production, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources | 51 |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 3 |
Overview
Vision and Strategy
Centerra’s vision is to build a team-based culture of excellence that responsibly delivers sustainable value and growth.
Centerra aims to meaningfully grow its low-cost operating portfolio, while building a great place to work, with care and consideration for the environment and the communities in which the Company operates. Centerra aims to achieve this overall strategy through the following strategic imperatives:
| • | Driving growth: Identifying, critically evaluating, and executing targeted growth opportunities to ensure the organization is best positioned for sustainable growth and value-creation. |
| • | Optimizing existing assets: leveraging the Company’s existing operations with consistent performance, focusing on activities that generate the most value. |
| • | Creating a great place to work: attracting, retaining, and developing diverse skilled talent to create a collaborative and inclusive environment. |
| • | Improving the Company’s environmental social governance (“ESG”) profile: maintaining and enhancing value for all of Centerra’s stakeholders by embedding ESG principles across the enterprise throughout the mine life cycle and by delivering on the Company’s targets. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 4 |
Centerra’s Business
Centerra is a Canadian-based gold mining company focused on operating, developing, exploring and acquiring gold properties in North America, Turkey, and other markets worldwide. Centerra’s principal continuing operations are the Mount Milligan gold-copper mine located in British Columbia, Canada (the “Mount Milligan Mine”), and the Öksüt gold mine located in Turkey (the “Öksüt Mine”). The Company also owns the pre-development stage Kemess project (the “Kemess Project”) in British Columbia, Canada as well as exploration properties in Canada, the United States of America and Turkey and has options to acquire exploration joint venture properties in Canada, Finland, Turkey, and the United States. The Company owns and operates a Molybdenum business unit (the “Molybdenum BU”), which includes the Langeloth metallurgical processing facility, operating in Pennsylvania, USA (the “Langeloth Facility”), and two primary molybdenum mines in care and maintenance: the Thompson Creek Mine in Idaho, USA, and the Endako Mine (75% ownership) in British Columbia, Canada.
Prior to May 15, 2021, the Company also consolidated the results of the Kumtor Mine, located in the Kyrgyz Republic, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kumtor Gold Company CJSC (“KGC”). Although the Company remains the rightful owner of KGC, the seizure of the Kumtor Mine and the continuing actions by the Kyrgyz Republic and Kyrgyzaltyn have resulted in the following: (i) the carrying value of the net assets of the mine were derecognized from the Company’s balance sheet, (ii) no value was ascribed to the Company’s interest in KGC, (iii) the Company recognized a loss on the change of control in the second quarter of 2021 and (iv) results of the Kumtor Mine’s operations are now presented as a discontinued operation in the Company’s financial statements.
As of December 31, 2021, Centerra’s significant subsidiaries are as follows:
| Entity | Property - Location | Current Status | Ownership | |||||
| Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. | Mount Milligan Mine - Canada | Operation | 100 | % | ||||
| Endako Mine - Canada | Care and maintenance | 75 | % | |||||
| Öksüt Madencilik A.S. | Öksüt Mine - Turkey | Operation | 100 | % | ||||
| Langeloth Metallurgical Company LLC | Langeloth - USA | Operation | 100 | % | ||||
| AuRico Metals Inc. | Kemess Project - Canada | Pre-development | 100 | % | ||||
| Thompson Creek Mining Co. | Thompson Creek Mine - USA | Care and maintenance | 100 | % | ||||
| Kumtor Gold Company CJSC | Kumtor Mine - Kyrgyz Republic | Discontinued operation | 100 | % | ||||
The Company’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange and trade under the symbols “CG” and “CGAU”, respectively.
As of February 24, 2022, there are 297,233,839 common shares issued and outstanding, options to acquire 3,076,614 common shares outstanding under the Company’s stock option plan, and 933,718 restricted share units outstanding under the Company’s restricted share unit plan (exercisable on a 1:1 basis for common shares). Based on its public filings, as of February 24, 2022, Kyrgyzaltyn beneficially owned 77,401,766 common shares of the Company.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 5 |
Overview of Consolidated Financial and Operating Highlights
| Three
months ended December 31 | Year
ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($millions, except as noted) | 2021 | 2020 | Change | 2021 | 2020 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Highlights (continuing operations basis, except as noted) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | 251.1 | 212.1 | 18 | % | 900.1 | 721.3 | 25 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Production costs | 132.0 | 99.2 | 33 | % | 487.7 | 410.0 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion, and amortization | 31.0 | 25.0 | 24 | % | 120.5 | 95.8 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from mine operations | 88.1 | 87.9 | 0 | % | 292.0 | 215.5 | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations | 274.9 | 31.6 | 770 | % | 446.9 | 16.1 | 2669 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations(1) | 35.4 | 40.9 | (13 | )% | 149.3 | 69.5 | 115 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | — | 63.6 | (100 | )% | (828.7 | ) | 392.4 | (311 | )% | |||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss)(2) | 274.9 | 95.2 | 189 | % | (381.8 | ) | 408.5 | 193 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings(1)(2) | 35.4 | 104.5 | (66 | )% | 233.6 | 461.9 | (49 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations | 61.8 | 84.3 | (27 | )% | 270.9 | 272.4 | (1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Free cash flow from continuing operations(1) | 38.7 | 48.7 | (21 | )% | 178.4 | 168.9 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations(1) | 44.0 | 48.7 | (10 | )% | 192.6 | 168.9 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations | — | 97.6 | (100 | )% | 143.9 | 657.6 | (78 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Net cash flow from discontinued operations(3) | — | 28.1 | (100 | )% | 47.8 | 428.9 | (89 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) | 46.9 | 65.8 | (29 | )% | 118.9 | 140.7 | (15 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures - total(1) | 28.1 | 40.4 | (30 | )% | 93.3 | 110.7 | (16 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures(1) | 25.7 | 28.0 | (8 | )% | 88.0 | 57.0 | 54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures(1) | 2.4 | 12.4 | (81 | )% | 5.3 | 53.7 | (90 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations per common share - basic(4) | 0.93 | 0.11 | 764 | % | 1.51 | 0.05 | 2651 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per common share - $/share basic(2)(4) | 0.93 | 0.32 | 186 | % | (1.29 | ) | 1.39 | (193 | )% | |||||||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations per common share - basic(1)(4) | 0.12 | 0.14 | (14 | )% | 0.50 | 0.24 | 113 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings per common share - $/share basic(1)(2)(4) | 0.12 | 0.35 | (66 | )% | 0.79 | 1.57 | (50 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating highlights (continuing operations basis) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold produced (oz) | 91,197 | 82,044 | 11 | % | 308,141 | 267,923 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Gold sold (oz)(5) | 90,312 | 73,309 | 23 | % | 314,757 | 259,603 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Average market gold price ($/oz)(6) | 1,795 | 1,876 | (4 | )% | 1,799 | 1,772 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Average realized gold price ($/oz )(7) | 1,504 | 1,650 | (9 | )% | 1,485 | 1,508 | (2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper produced (000s lbs) | 16,993 | 20,376 | (17 | )% | 73,275 | 82,816 | (12 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper sold (000s lbs) | 17,184 | 18,975 | (9 | )% | 78,017 | 80,477 | (3 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Average market copper price ($/lb)(6) | 4.40 | 3.27 | 35 | % | 4.23 | 2.80 | 51 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Average realized copper price ($/lb)(7) | 3.59 | 2.79 | 29 | % | 2.92 | 2.22 | 32 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Molybdenum sold (000s lbs) | 2,361 | 3,610 | (35 | )% | 11,461 | 13,667 | (16 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Average market molybdenum price ($/lb) | 18.89 | 9.01 | 110 | % | 15.98 | 8.68 | 84 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Unit costs (continuing operations basis) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold production costs ($/oz) | 550 | 537 | 2 | % | 604 | 615 | (2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis ($/oz)(1) | 591 | 813 | (27 | )% | 649 | 718 | (10 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basis ($/oz)(1) | 732 | 1,144 | (36 | )% | 785 | 1,116 | (30 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Gold - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis($/oz)(1) | 829 | 1,070 | (23 | )% | 891 | 954 | (7 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper production costs ($/lb) | 1.79 | 1.31 | 37 | % | 1.51 | 1.24 | 22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis – ($/lb)(1) | 2.34 | 1.80 | 30 | % | 1.94 | 1.48 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Non-GAAP financial measure. See discussion under “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”. | |
| (2) | Inclusive of the results from the Kumtor Mine prior to the loss of control on May 15, 2021. | |
| (3) | Calculated as the sum of cash flow provided by operating activities from discontinued operations, cash flow used in investing activities from discontinued operations and cash flow used in financing activities from discontinued operations. | |
| (4) | As at December 31, 2021, the Company had 297,064,750 common shares issued and outstanding, of which 26.1% were held by Kyrgyzaltyn. | |
| (5) | Includes 6,654 ounces of gold in 2020, which were sold prior to achieving commercial production at the Öksüt Mine on May 31, 2020. | |
| (6) | Average for the period as reported by the London Bullion Market Association (“LBMA”) US-dollar Gold P.M. Fix Rate and London Metal Exchange (“LME”). | |
| (7) | This supplementary financial measure within the meaning of 52-112 is calculated as a ratio of revenue from the consolidated financial statements and units metal sold and includes the impact from the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement and the impact of copper hedges. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 6 |
Overview of Consolidated Results
Although the Company remains the rightful legal owner of KGC, due to the seizure of the Kumtor Mine and the continuing actions by the Kyrgyz Republic and Kyrgyzaltyn, the Company derecognized the assets and liabilities of the Kumtor Mine in the statements of financial position and presented its financial and operating results prior to the loss of control as discontinued operations for the three months and year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. As a result, the Company’s consolidated results from continuing operations discussed in this MD&A (including prior periods) exclude the Kumtor Mine’s operations, unless otherwise noted.
Fourth Quarter 2021 compared to Fourth Quarter 2020
Net earnings of $274.9 million were recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to net earnings from continuing operations of $31.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase in net earnings was primarily due to a $117.3 million impairment reversal at the Mount Milligan Mine (net of tax), the recognition of a $144.0 million deferred tax asset related to the Mount Milligan Mine and a $25.0 million incremental gain recognized on the sale of the Company’s interest in the Greenstone Gold Mines Partnership (“Greenstone Partnership”). The increase was partially offset by higher current income tax expense related to the Öksüt Mine. The Company did not report any earnings related to discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2021. Net earnings from discontinued operations were $63.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Adjusted net earningsNG of $35.4 million were recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to adjusted net earningsNG from continuing operations of $40.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The slight decrease in adjusted net earningsNG was primarily due to a decrease in gold sold at the Öksüt Mine and a decrease in the copper sold at the Mount Milligan Mine, partially offset by an increase in gold sold at the Mount Milligan Mine.
The most significant adjusting items to net earnings in the fourth quarter of 2021 were:
| • | $11.3 million in legal and other costs directly related to the seizure of the Kumtor Mine; | |
| • | $24.2 million reclamation provision revaluation expense at sites on care and maintenance in the Molybdenum BU, resulting primarily from the change in estimated future reclamation cash flows and a decrease in the discount rate applied to these cash flows; | |
| • | $132.7 million of income tax adjustments related primarily to the recognition of a deferred tax asset related to the Mount Milligan Mine; | |
| • | $117.3 million, net of tax, related to the impairment reversal of the Mount Milligan Mine; and | |
| • | $25.0 million gain on the sale of the Greenstone project as a result of the construction decision milestone at the Greenstone project, triggering an additional payment to the Company by no later than December 2023. |
The most significant adjusting item to net earnings from continuing operations in the fourth quarter of 2020 was a $9.3 million reclamation provision revaluation expense at sites on care and maintenance in Molybdenum BU, primarily due to a decrease in the discount rate being applied to the estimated future reclamation cash flows.
Cash provided by operating activities was $61.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations of $84.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to an unfavourable working capital change at the Molybdenum BU from an increase in product inventory held and a higher average molybdenum price and an increase in income taxes paid of $9.6 million, primarily related to the Öksüt Mine. The Company did not report any cash flows related to discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2021. Cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations was $97.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Free cash flowNG of $38.7 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to free cash flowNG from continuing operations of $48.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease in free cash flowNG was primarily due to lower cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by slightly lower sustaining capital expendituresNG.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 7 |
Year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020
A net loss of $381.8 million was recognized in 2021, compared to net earnings of $408.5 million in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the loss of $926.4 million recognized on the change of control of the Kumtor Mine and a full year of earnings from the Kumtor Mine in 2020, compared to four and half months in 2021. Net earnings from continuing operations of $446.9 million were recognized in 2021, compared to $16.1 million in 2020. The increase was primarily due to a $117.3 impairment reversal at the Mount Milligan Mine (net of tax), the recognition of a $144.0 million deferred tax asset related to the Mount Milligan Mine, a gain of $97.3 million on the sale of the Company’s interest in the Greenstone Partnership, an increase in earnings from mine operations at the Mount Milligan Mine and the Molybdenum BU and a decrease in reclamation expense at sites placed on care and maintenance. The increase was partially offset by higher tax expense resulting from both the gain on the sale of the Company’s interest in the Greenstone Partnership and higher income tax expense related to the Öksüt Mine.
Adjusted net earningsNG were $233.6 million in 2021, compared to adjusted net earningsNG of $461.9 million in 2020. The difference is primarily due to the inclusion of earnings from operations from the Kumtor Mine up to the loss of control on May 15, 2021 of $84.4 million, compared to a full year of earnings from operations from the Kumtor Mine in 2020 of $394.3. Adjusted net earningsNG from continuing operations in 2021 were $149.3 million, compared to $69.5 million in 2020.
Significant adjusting items to net loss in 2021 include:
| • | $926.4 million loss on the change of control of the Kumtor Mine; | |
| • | $27.5 million of legal and other related costs directly related to the seizure of the Kumtor Mine; | |
| • | $24.1 million reclamation provision revaluation expense at sites on care and maintenance in the Molybdenum BU, resulting primarily from the change in the estimated future reclamation cash flows and a decrease in the discount rate applied to these cash flows; | |
| • | $132.7 million of income tax adjustments related primarily to the recognition of a deferred tax asset related to the Mount Milligan Mine; | |
| • | $117.3 million, net of tax, related to the impairment reversal of the Mount Milligan Mine; | |
| • | $97.3 million gain on the sale of the Greenstone Partnership; and | |
| • | $15.3 million gain from the discontinuance of the Kumtor Mine’s fuel hedging instruments. |
The most significant adjusting item to net earnings in 2020 was a $53.4 million reclamation provision revaluation expense at sites on care and maintenance related to the Molybdenum BU, resulting solely from the movement in the discount rate being applied to the estimated future reclamation cash flows.
Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $270.9 million in 2021, compared to $272.4 million in 2020. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was primarily due to an unfavourable working capital change at the Molybdenum BU from an increase in product inventory held at a higher average molybdenum price, a decrease in earnings from mine operations at the Öksüt Mine and an increase in income taxes paid of $17.2 million in 2021 compared to income taxes refunded of $18.5 million in 2020. Partially offsetting the decrease was an increase in earnings from mine operations and a more favourable change in working capital at the Mount Milligan Mine from the timing of vendor payments between periods.
Free cash flowNG from continuing operations of $178.4 million was recognized in 2021 compared to $168.9 million in 2020. The increase in free cash flowNG from continuing operations was due to lower spending at the Kemess Project as well as no spending at the Greenstone project which was divested in January 2021, partially offset by higher sustaining capital expendituresNG at the Öksüt Mine primarily due to heap leach expansion and capitalized drilling costs.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 8 |
2022 Outlook
The Company’s 2022 outlook and comparative actual results for 2021 are set out in the following table and exclude information related to the Goldfield Project:
| Mount Milligan(1) | Öksüt | Consolidated(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (on continuing operations basis) | Units | 2021 | 2022 Guidance | 2021 | 2022 Guidance | 2021 | 2022 Guidance | ||||||||||||||||
| Production | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unstreamed gold production | (Koz) | 127 | 123 - 136 | 112 | 210 - 240 | 239 | 333 - 376 | ||||||||||||||||
| Streamed gold production | (Koz) | 69 | 67 - 74 | — | — | 69 | 67 - 74 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total gold production(3) | (Koz) | 196 | 190 - 210 | 112 | 210 - 240 | 308 | 400 - 450 | ||||||||||||||||
| Unstreamed copper production | (Mlb) | 59 | 57 - 65 | — | — | 59 | 57 - 65 | ||||||||||||||||
| Streamed copper production | (Mlb) | 14 | 13 - 15 | — | — | 14 | 13 - 15 | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper production(3) | (Mlb) | 73 | 70 - 80 | — | — | 73 | 70 - 80 | ||||||||||||||||
| Costs | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold production costs | ($/oz) | 683 | 675 - 725 | 457 | 300 - 350 | 604 | 500 - 550 | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG | ($/oz) | 508 | 575 - 625 | 668 | 425 - 475 | 649 | 600 - 650 | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basisNG | ($/oz) | 556 | 600 - 650 | 694 | 450 - 500 | 785 | 700 - 750 | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basisNG | ($/oz) | 883 | 900 - 950 | 668 | 425 - 475 | 891 | 750 - 800 | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper production costs | ($/lb) | 1.51 | 1.70 - 1.85 | — | — | 1.51 | 1.70 - 1.85 | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basisNG | ($/lb) | 1.94 | 2.40 - 2.55 | — | — | 1.94 | 2.40 - 2.55 | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital Expenditures | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to PP&E | ($M) | 83.7 | 70 - 75 | 24.9 | 20 - 25 | 118.9 | 95 - 105 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Capital ExpendituresNG | ($M) | 70.8 | 70 - 75 | 19.6 | 20 - 25 | 93.3 | 95 - 105 | ||||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capitalNG | ($M) | 66.7 | 65 - 70 | 18.8 | 20 - 25 | 88.0 | 90 - 100 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-sustaining capitalNG | ($M) | 4.1 | 5 | 0.8 | — | 5.3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other Costs | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kemess Project | ($M) | — | — | — | — | 14.1 | 13 - 15 | ||||||||||||||||
| Molybdenum BU | ($M) | — | — | — | — | 39.8 | 15 - 20 | ||||||||||||||||
| Exploration(4) | ($M) | — | — | — | — | 37.4 | 35 - 45 | ||||||||||||||||
| Corporate administration | ($M) | — | — | — | — | 27.1 | 40 - 45 | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | ($M) | 83.9 | 95 - 105 | 30.2 | 45 - 50 | 120.5 | 150 - 165 | ||||||||||||||||
| Current income taxes | ($M) | — | — | — | — | 40.1 | 85 - 100 | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash Flows | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities | ($M) | — | — | — | — | 270.9 | 300 - 350 | ||||||||||||||||
| Free cash flowNG | ($M) | — | — | — | — | 178.4 | 200 - 250 | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | The Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement entitles Royal Gold to 35% and 18.75% of gold and copper sales, respectively, and requires Royal Gold to pay $435 per ounce of gold and 15% of the spot price per metric tonne of copper delivered. Assuming a market gold price of $1,700 per ounce and market copper price of $4.00 per pound, Mount Milligan Mine’s average realized gold and copper price for 2022 would be $1,257 per ounce and $3.36 per pound, respectively. |
| (2) | Unit costs and consolidated unit costs include a credit for forecasted copper sales treated as by-product for all-in sustaining costs. Production for copper and gold reflects estimated metallurgical losses resulting from handling of the concentrate and metal deductions, subject to metal content, levied by smelters. |
| (3) | Gold and copper production at the Mount Milligan Mine assumes recoveries of 69% and 81%, respectively, and 72% gold recovery at the Öksüt Mine. 2022 gold ounces and copper pounds sold are expected to be consistent with production. |
| (4) | Includes both expensed and capitalized exploration costs and excludes business development expenses. Capitalized exploration costs are included in the sustaining capital expendituresNG. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 9 |
Production Profile
Centerra’s 2022 gold production is expected to be between 400,000 to 450,000 ounces, compared to 308,141 ounces produced in 2021.
Mount Milligan Mine’s 2022 production is expected to be consistent with 2021. Gold production is expected to be in the range of 190,000 to 210,000 ounces compared to 196,438 ounces produced in 2021. Copper production is expected to be in the range of 70 to 80 million pounds compared to 73 million pounds produced in 2021. Gold and copper production is expected to be back-end weighted in 2022, with the first half of the year representing approximately 40% of the 2022 annual metal production total while the second half of the year will represent approximately 60% of the 2022 annual metal production total. The changes to expected gold and copper production at the Mount Milligan Mine are due to mine sequence.
At the Öksüt Mine, 2022 gold production is expected to increase to the range of 210,000 to 240,000 ounces compared to 111,703 ounces produced in 2021. Gold production is expected to be back-end weighted in 2022, with the first half of the year representing approximately 40% of the 2022 annual gold production total while the second half of the year will represent approximately 60% of the 2022 annual gold production total. The average grade of ore stacked to the heap leach pad in 2022 is expected to be approximately 2.30 g/t compared to 1.54 g/t in 2021. Gold production guidance assumes that mining will continue at the Keltepe pit and the Güneytepe pit and assumes the receipt of permits from local authorities mid-2022.
Cost Profile
Gold production costs are expected to be in the range of $500 to $550 per ounce in 2022, a reduction from $604 per ounce in 2021, primarily due to higher gold sales at the Öksüt Mine. Mount Milligan Mine’s gold production costs are expected to be in the range of $675 to $725 per ounce in 2022, compared to $683 per ounce in 2021 as higher mining, milling and site administration costs are expected to be partially offset by a higher allocation of costs to copper. Gold production costs at the Öksüt Mine are expected to be in the range of $300 to $350 per ounce in 2022, a significant decrease compared to $457 per ounce in 2021, primarily due to an increase in gold production, partially offset by slightly higher operating costs, including higher royalty costs due to higher revenue.
Copper production costs at the Mount Milligan Mine are expected to be $1.70 to $1.85 per pound in 2022, an increase from $1.51 per pound of copper in 2021. The increase in copper production costs is due to higher mining, milling and site administration costs at the mine, and a higher allocation of these costs to copper in 2022.
Consolidated all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG are expected to be in the range of $600 to $650 per ounce, compared to $649 per ounce in 2021. Mount Milligan Mine’s all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG are expected to be in the range of $575 to $625 per ounce in 2022 compared to $508 per ounce in 2021, primarily due to higher production costs. The expected increase in production costs at the Mount Milligan Mine is primarily due to inflationary pressure. In 2021, the Mount Milligan Mine benefited from significant levels of inventory purchased at lower cost in 2020, which insulated the Company from the impacts of COVID-19 and inflation. The Öksüt Mine’s all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounceNG are expected to be in the range of $425 to $475 per ounce, a significant decrease compared to $668 per ounce in 2021 due to an increase in gold ounces sold, partially offset by higher operating costs. Consolidated all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounceNG are estimated to be in the range of $600 to $650 per ounce for 2022 compared to $649 per ounce in 2021, which reflect higher operating costs at the Mount Milligan Mine, higher corporate administration costs, offset by a significant increase in ounces sold for the Öksüt Mine.
Consolidated all-in costs on a by-product basisNG are expected to be in the range of $700 to $750 per ounce, a decrease compared to $785 in 2021. The Mount Milligan Mine’s all-in costs on a by-product basisNG are expected to be in the range of $600 to $650 per ounce in 2022 compared to $556 per ounce in 2021. The all-in costs on a by-product basis per ounceNG at the Mount Milligan Mine are expected to increase in 2022 due to higher operating costs compared to 2021. The Öksüt Mine’s all-in costs on a by-product basisNG are forecasted to be in the range of $450 to $500 per ounce, a significant decrease compared to $694 per ounce in 2021 due to an increase in gold ounces sold, partially offset by higher operating costs.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 10 |
Capital Expenditures
Additions to PP&E, which is a GAAP figure, include certain non-cash additions to PP&E such as changes in future reclamation costs and capitalization of leases while capital expendituresNG, comprised of sustaining capital expendituresNG and non-sustaining capital expendituresNG, which are non-GAAP measures and exclude them. Consolidated additions to PP&E in 2022 are expected to be in the range of $95 to $105 million compared to $118.9 million in 2021. Total capital expendituresNG in 2022 are expected to be in the range of $95 to $105 million, consistent with 2022 expected additions to PP&E and slightly higher than 2021 capital expendituresNG of $93.3 million, primarily due to a slight increase in sustaining capital expenditures at the Öksüt Mine.
Sustaining capital expendituresNG in 2022 are expected to be $90 to $100 million, a slight increase from $88 million in 2021. Sustaining capital expendituresNG in 2022 at the Mount Milligan Mine are estimated to be in the range of $65 to $70 million, in line with $66.7 million in 2021 and relate primarily to the tailings storage facility (“TSF”) costs, major overhauls and water management costs. Sustaining capital expendituresNG in 2022 at the Öksüt Mine are expected to be $20 to $25 million compared to $18.8 million in 2021 and relate primarily to the heap leach expansion, improvements to the absorption, desorption and recovery (“ADR”) plant, capitalized stripping costs and other site support equipment costs.
Non-sustaining capital expendituresNG in 2022 are consistent with prior year and relate to the Stage Flotation Reactors (“SFR”) project to improve future metal recoveries at the Mount Milligan Mine, which is expected to be commissioned in the first half of 2022.
Molybdenum Business Unit
In 2022, care and maintenance expenses and reclamation expenditures related to the Molybdenum BU are estimated to be between $20 and $25 million, including approximately $5 to $7 million of reclamation expenditures at the Endako Mine. In 2021, the Company incurred $14.6 million of care and maintenance expenses related to the Molybdenum BU and $1.0 million of reclamation expenditures at the Endako Mine. 2022 care and maintenance costs are expected to be partially offset by the cash generated by the Langeloth metallurgical processing facility. The net cash required to maintain the Molybdenum BU is expected to be in the range of $15 to $20 million, compared to $39.8 million in 2021. The Company’s assumed molybdenum price for 2022 is $17 per pound compared to average market price of $16 per pound in 2021.
Exploration Expenditures
| Mount Milligan | Öksüt | Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($millions) | 2021 | 2022 Guidance | 2021 | 2022 Guidance | 2021 | 2022 Guidance | 2021 | 2022 Guidance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exploration | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expensed | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | $ | 2 | $ | 5 | $ | 24 | $18 - $28 | $ | 32 | $29 - $39 | ||||||||||||||||
| Capitalized(1) | $ | 3 | $ | 6 | $ | 2 | — | — | — | $ | 5 | $6 | ||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 9 | $ | 12 | $ | 4 | $ | 5 | $ | 24 | $18 - $28 | $ | 37 | $35 - $45 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) Included in sustaining capital expendituresNG.
Planned exploration expenditures for 2022 are expected to be between $35 million and $45 million, including approximately $17 million for exploration at our existing mine sites and the balance for greenfield and generative exploration programs at other locations. At the Mount Milligan Mine, exploration activities are focused on extending resources and reserves below the current ultimate pit boundary by testing the width and continuity of a corridor of high- grade mineralization in the MBX stock footwall. At the Öksüt Mine, the key objectives for drilling activities in 2022 include expanding oxide gold resources at the Keltepe North, Keltepe Northwest, and Keltepe North-Northwest deposits. Greenfield exploration programs will focus on expanding and enhancing existing portfolio of projects in the US, Canada, Turkey, Finland and other global locations which include $3 million for the Sivritepe project in Turkey.
In addition to the exploration expenditures identified above, the Company expects to incur $15 to $20 million in relation to the exploration activities at the Goldfield Project in 2022.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 11 |
Corporate Administration
Corporate and administration expenses for 2022 are expected to be in the range of $40 to $45 million (including $8 million to $10 million of stock-based compensation expense). Corporate and administration expenses in 2021 were $27.1 including stock-based compensation expense of $1.3 million. The corporate and administration expenses are expected to be higher in 2022 compared to 2021 due to higher stock-based compensation expense, higher travel and personnel costs assuming a return to in-office work arrangements and lifting of public health measures and travel advisories, higher consulting costs related to corporate initiatives, including implementation of new enterprise resource planning software and higher insurance costs.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation, depletion, and amortization (“DD&A”) expense included in costs of sales expense for 2022 is expected to be in the range of $150 to $165 million, an increase compared to $120.5 million in 2021, primarily due to the increased PP&E depreciable balance from the reversal of an impairment at the Mount Milligan Mine in the fourth quarter of 2021. Mount Milligan Mine’s DD&A expense is expected to be $95 to $105 million, and Öksüt Mine’s DD&A expense is expected to be $45 to $50 million in 2022.
Taxes
Income tax in relation to the Öksüt Mine is estimated to be between $80 to $90 million, reflecting a 23% income tax rate, as well as withholding tax on expected repatriation of earnings. The higher 2022 tax expense at the Öksüt Mine reflects the full utilization of the Investment Incentive Certificate by the end of 2021. The Mount Milligan Mine is subject to British Columbia mineral tax which is forecast to be between $5 and $10 million.
Cash Flow Profile
The Company expects higher cash generation in 2022 compared to cash generation from continuing operations in 2021. In 2022, consolidated cash provided by operating activities and free cash flowNG are expected to be in the range of $300 to $350 million and $200 to $250 million, respectively. Consolidated cash provided by operating activities and free cash flowNG from continuing operations in 2021 were $270.9 million and $178.4 million, respectively. The increase in cash generation from continuing operations in 2022 compared to 2021, is primarily due to an increase in gold ounces sold at the Öksüt Mine, partially offset by higher production costs at both mines, an increase in sustaining capital expendituresNG at the Öksüt Mine, higher cash taxes at the Öksüt Mine and higher corporate administration spending.
2022 Material Assumptions
Material assumptions or factors used to forecast production and costs for 2022, after giving effect to the hedges in place as at December 31, 2021, include the following:
| · | a market gold price of $1,700 per ounce and an average realized gold price at the Mount Milligan Mine of $1,257 per ounce after reflecting the streaming arrangement with Royal Gold (35% of the Mount Milligan Mine’s gold is sold for $435 per ounce). |
| · | a market copper price of $4.00 per pound and an average realized copper price at the Mount Milligan Mine of $3.36 per pound after reflecting the streaming arrangement with Royal Gold (18.75% of the Mount Milligan Mine’s copper is sold at 15% of the spot price per metric tonne). |
| · | a molybdenum price of $17.00 per pound. |
| · | exchange rates: $1USD:$1.26 CAD; $1USD:13.0 Turkish lira; with a Turkish inflation assumption of 36%. |
| · | diesel fuel price assumption: $0.72/litre (CAD$0.91/litre) at the Mount Milligan Mine. |
Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement
The Mount Milligan Mine is an open pit mine located in north central British Columbia, Canada producing a gold and copper concentrate. Production at the Mount Milligan Mine is subject to an arrangement with RGLD Gold AG and Royal Gold, Inc. (together, “Royal Gold”) pursuant to which Royal Gold is entitled to purchase 35% of the gold produced and 18.75% of the copper production at the Mount Milligan Mine for $435 per ounce of gold delivered and 15% of the spot price per metric tonne of copper delivered (the “Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement”). To satisfy its obligations under the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement the Company purchases refined gold and copper warrants and arranges for delivery to Royal Gold. The difference between the cost of the purchases of refined gold and copper warrants, and the corresponding amounts payable to the Company under the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement is recorded as a reduction of revenue and not a cost of operating the mine.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 12 |
Other Material Assumptions
Other material assumptions used in forecasting production and costs for 2022 can be found under the heading “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information” in this document. Production, cost, and capital forecasts for 2022 are forward- looking information and are based on key assumptions and subject to material risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially and which are discussed under the heading “Risks That Can Affect Centerra’s Business” in the Company’s most recent AIF. The costs and cash flow impact associated with continued litigation and/or potential settlement of the Kumtor Mine dispute have not been incorporated into the 2022 guidance.
2022 Sensitivities
Centerra’s revenues, earnings, and cash flows for 2022 are sensitive to changes in certain key inputs or currencies. The Company has estimated the impact of any such changes on revenues, net earnings, and cash flows.
| Impact
on ($millions) | Impact
on ($ per ounce sold) | |||||||||||||
| Production Costs & Taxes | Capital Costs | Revenues | Cash flows | Net
Earnings (after tax) | All-in
sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounceNG | |||||||||
| Gold price | $50/oz | 1.5 - 4.0 | — | 16.5 - 19.0 | 12.5 - 17.5 | 12.5 - 17.5 | 4.0 - 5.0 | |||||||
| Copper price(1) | 10% | 0.2 - 0.4 | — | 4.4 - 6.7 | 4.2 - 6.5 | 4.2 - 6.5 | 14.5 - 16.5 | |||||||
| Diesel fuel(1) | 10% | 1.5 - 1.6 | 0.3 - 0.5 | — | 1.8 - 2.1 | 1.5 - 1.6 | 4.5 - 5.5 | |||||||
| Canadian dollar(1)(2) | 10 cents | 11.5 - 13.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | — | 13.0 - 15.5 | 11.5 - 13.5 | 34.5 - 39.0 | |||||||
| Turkish lira(2)(3) | 1 lira | 1.5 - 2.5 | 0.5 - 1.0 | — | 2.0 - 3.5 | 2.0 - 3.5 | 5.0 - 7.0 |
| (1) | Includes the effect of the Company’s copper sales, diesel fuel and Canadian dollars hedging programs, with current 2022 exposure coverage approximately 70%, 65% and 65%, respectively. |
| (2) | Appreciation of currency against the US dollar will result in higher costs and lower cash flow and earnings, depreciation of currency against the US dollar results in decreased costs and increased cash flow and earnings. |
| (3) | Assumes an increase in the Turkish Lira will be partially offset by inflation. |
Production, cost and capital guidance for 2022 are forward-looking information and are based on key assumptions and subject to material risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially and which are discussed herein under the headings “2022 Material Assumptions” and “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information” in this document and under the heading “Risks That Can Affect Centerra’s Business” in this document and the Company’s most recently filed AIF.
Mount Milligan Mine Technical Report and Three-Year Outlook / 2023 Guidance Update
The Company expects to conclude its ongoing life of mine planning work and issue a new National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) technical report for the Mount Milligan Mine in the second quarter of 2022. Accordingly, the Company is reviewing its consolidated three-year outlook, including 2023 guidance which is likely to change from previously issued guidance and should no longer be relied upon. The Company expects to release an updated three-year outlook during the second quarter of 2022.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 13 |
Recent Events and Developments
Goldfield Project
On February 22, 2022, Centerra announced that it had entered into an agreement to acquire Gemfield Resources LLC, owner of the Goldfield Project, from Waterton Nevada Splitter, LLC for total consideration comprised of $175 million in cash at closing and a $31.5 million deferred milestone payment. At the option of Centerra, the deferred milestone payment is payable in cash or common shares of the Company and becomes payable the earlier of 18 months following the closing of the transaction or the date a construction decision is confirmed with respect to the project, among other things.
Goldfield is a conventional open-pit, heap leach project located in a Tier 1 mining jurisdiction and contains three known deposits. The Company believes that the project has an upside potential from its large, under-explored land position in an established mining area in Nevada. The project increases Centerra's exposure to North America and provides an asset that can act as a foothold for further opportunities in the United States.
The Company has identified numerous targets for drilling activities in 2022 with the potential to expand known deposits. Centerra also plans to further refine existing technical studies undertaken to date by the previous owner, with a resource estimate expected to be released in the first half of 2023 and an updated technical study thereafter.
Kumtor Mine
In 2021, the Kyrgyz Republic and Kyrgyzaltyn took a number of coordinated actions that resulted in the seizure of the Kumtor Mine by the Kyrgyz Republic and a loss of control of the Kumtor Mine by Centerra. In particular:
| · | The Kyrgyz Republic Parliament established a State Commission in February 2021 to, among other things, review the performance of the Kumtor Mine and to review the results of a previous Kyrgyz Republic State Commission established in 2012. |
| · | The Kyrgyz Republic Government resurrected a number of historical tax claims and environmental claims relating to Kumtor, each of which was resolved years prior either through previous settlements or Kyrgyz court decisions. When the Company disclosed the tax claims in March 2021, the amounts claimed by the Kyrgyz Republic were estimated to be approximately $352 million, including taxes, interest and penalties and the Kyrgyz officials subsequently increased the amounts claimed to over $1 billion and brought them into the arbitration proceedings. The Company denies these claims; |
| · | A Kyrgyz court rendered a decision awarding damages against KGC of approximately $3.1 billion payable to the Kyrgyz Republic in respect of alleged damages caused by KGC’s past practice of placing waste rock on glaciers. The Company denies these claims; |
| · | During the spring of 2021, the Kyrgyz Republic Parliament began to consider several laws and legislative amendments that, among other things, would fundamentally alter and breach the 2009 restated Kumtor project agreements, including the 2009 Kyrgyz law that ratified the Kumtor project agreements. Such amendments would not only delete provisions that ensure the primacy of the Kumtor project agreements over other Kyrgyz legislation, but also subject Kumtor to certain Kyrgyz laws of general application, including tax laws; and, |
| · | The Kyrgyz Republic seized control of the Kumtor Mine on May 15, 2021 through a coordinated effort to take control of the Kumtor Mine site, KGC’s offices, personnel, computers and documents. The Kyrgyz Republic acted following a preliminary report of the State Commission which made a number of groundless claims against Centerra, KGC and the Kumtor Mine and under the purported authority of a new Temporary Management Law hastily passed by the Kyrgyz Republic Parliament only a few days prior to such seizure. |
According to statements made by Kyrgyz Republic authorities during and after the events described above, the Company understands that the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic has opened a series of criminal investigations relating to the Kumtor Mine and, in particular, alleged corruption of previous agreements entered into between Centerra, its predecessor, and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. The Company further understands that at various times the Kyrgyz Republic Government has arrested or detained a significant number of former Kyrgyz politicians and government officials, including several former prime ministers, in connection with such investigations.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 14 |
In addition, there have been reports that the Kyrgyz Republic has reopened a series of criminal investigations in connection with the Kyrgyz Republic General Prosecutor Office’s attempt to unwind an ordinary course $200 million dividend declared and paid by KGC to its sole shareholder, Centerra, in December 2013. The Company also understands that the Kyrgyz Republic has opened a criminal investigation into alleged “cyber-sabotage” and violations of Kumtor Mine employee rights related to actions taken by Centerra to disable Kyrgyz users from accessing its IT systems around the time of the seizure of the Kumtor Mine. Such reports identify certain members of former Centerra and KGC management teams and state that those individuals were prosecuted in absentia and put on wanted lists by the State Committee for National Security of the Kyrgyz Republic. The use of the Kyrgyz criminal law and investigations as a pressure tactic in aid of economic or commercial goals is not new for the Kyrgyz Republic. The Company denies any such allegations, which should be viewed in the broader context, including the Kyrgyz Republic Government’s goal of seizing the Kumtor Mine and intimidating its political opponents.
Centerra, KGC and Kumtor Operating Company CJSC (“KOC”) have taken a number of measures in response to the Kyrgyz Republic’s unjustified and illegal seizure of the Kumtor Mine. In particular:
| · | The Company has initiated binding arbitration against the Kyrgyz Republic and Kyrgyzaltyn to enforce its rights under longstanding agreements governing the Kumtor Mine and to, among other things, hold the Kyrgyz Republic and Kyrgyzaltyn accountable for any and all losses and damages that result from its actions against KGC and the Kumtor Mine. Following the resignation of the arbitrator on October 27, 2021 (citing the refusal by the Kyrgyz Republic and Kyrgyzaltyn to agree to protections he had requested against personal claims being brought against him by the parties or to pay his requested fees), a new arbitrator was appointed to adjudicate the arbitration dispute. The Company also filed an application requesting urgent interim measures in connection with the arbitration proceedings to address certain critical operational and safety problems at the Kumtor Mine to preserve the status quo at the Kumtor Mine and obtain some transparency and reporting as to the mine’s activities; |
| · | In accordance with longstanding shareholder and investment agreements, the Company has taken steps to restrict Kyrgyzaltyn from transferring or encumbering any common shares of the Company or exercising any voting rights or dissent rights attached to Centerra common shares. In addition, dividends or distributions on Centerra common shares that would otherwise be payable to Kyrgyzaltyn or its affiliates are waived and will be donated to the Company to the extent such dividends or distributions can be attributed reasonably to KGC (or the Kumtor Mine’s assets or operations) or distributions from KGC; |
| · | KGC and KOC filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the federal U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the Southern District of New York. The court-supervised process provides for, among other things, a worldwide automatic stay of all claims against KGC and KOC which the Company hopes will deter the Kyrgyz Republic from taking further precipitous action against KGC and the Kumtor Mine, including actions to enforce the meritless environmental and tax claims noted above; and, |
| · | The Company initiated proceedings in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against Tengiz Bolturuk, a former director of the Company who resigned from the Company’s board of directors to assume control of the Kumtor Mine on behalf of the Kyrgyz Republic as external manager, for breaches of his fiduciary duties to the Company. |
No assurances can be given that Centerra will be successful in any of the foregoing legal proceedings. There also remains the further risk that additional regulatory, tax, or civil claims will be commenced against the Company and/or its Kyrgyz subsidiaries.
Since late 2021, the Company has been engaged in discussions and negotiations with representatives of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic to resolve the outstanding disputes relating to the illegal seizure of control of the Kumtor Mine by the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic in May 2021. On January 3, 2022, and subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2021, Centerra publicly confirmed such negotiations and stated the framework of a resolution under discussion could involve the following principal terms:
| · | Centerra receiving the approximately 26.1% in Centerra common shares held by Kyrgyzaltyn (an instrumentality of the Kyrgyz Republic). Upon receipt, Centerra would cancel the shares surrendered by Kyrgyzaltyn. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 15 |
| · | The Kyrgyz Republic receiving, and assuming all responsibility for KGC and KOC, the Company’s two Kyrgyz subsidiaries, and the Kumtor Mine. |
| · | Payment, by Centerra, of a cash amount equal to the net amount of the three dividends paid by Centerra in 2021 that Kyrgyzaltyn did not receive as a result of the seizure of the mine and certain other financial consideration associated with the settlement of intercompany balances between Centerra and its Kyrgyz subsidiaries. |
| · | The resignation from Centerra’s Board of Directors of Kyrgyzaltyn’s two nominees. |
| · | Full and final releases of all claims of the parties and termination of all legal proceedings involving the parties in all jurisdictions with no admissions of liability. |
Negotiations with representatives of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic are ongoing, and there can be no assurance that any proposed resolution will be consummated or as to the final economic and other terms and conditions of any such resolution, if agreed. Any such resolution would need to be formalized in a definitive agreement and would be subject to compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements and approvals, including any applicable independent valuation or shareholder or government approval requirements.
On February 15, 2022, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice rendered a decision in the Company’s favour in its application for an order restraining Tengiz Bolturuk from breaching of his fiduciary duties as a former director of the Company. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued an injunction, permanently enjoining Mr. Bolturuk from disclosing or using any of the Company’s confidential information and restraining him from having any involvement, directly or indirectly, with the management, operation or control of the Kumtor Mine so long as Centerra has or asserts an interest in KGC or the Kumtor Mine, as well as awarding costs to the Company. As previously noted, Mr. Bolturuk resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors in May 2021 to assume control of the Kumtor Mine on behalf of the Kyrgyz Republic as external manager. No assurances can be given that any injunctions ordered are respected, or that any costs awards granted in connection with any resolved proceedings will be paid.
For more information regarding the events surrounding the seizure of the Kumtor Mine, please refer to the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the periods ended March 31, 2021, June 30, 2021, and September 30, 2021.
COVID-19 Update
Centerra continues to take steps to minimize the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on its business. The Company has established strict protocols at its mine sites to help prevent infection and reduce the potential transmission of COVID-19. A testing facility, funded by the Company, has been recently established at the Mount Milligan Mine to perform rapid testing of all employees, contractors, and other visitors to the site. Vaccination clinics have been set up for employees and contractors at the Mount Milligan Mine and the Öksüt Mine. As at December 31, 2021, more than 99% and 75% of site employees at the Öksüt Mine have received two and three doses of vaccination, respectively. A vaccination program was also conducted at the Mount Milligan Mine making first second and third doses available to all employees. The Company believes that this program, in combination with a robust provincial program in British Columbia, has resulted in a large percentage of employees being inoculated. While COVID-19 vaccination rates continue to rise in the communities and countries in which the Company operates its mine sites and offices, the Company continues to maintain its COVID-19 protocols.
Neither the Mount Milligan Mine nor the Öksüt Mine have been adversely impacted by COVID-19 in any significant way as employee absences due to COVID-19, or any other illnesses, have so far been successfully managed. However, the Company notes that the effects of COVID-19 on its business continue to change rapidly. Centerra continues to assess the resiliency of its supply chains, maintaining increased mine site inventories of key materials and fixed asset components. Additionally, the Company is pursuing an active sourcing strategy to identify potential alternatives for its critical supplies that can be purchased in alternative countries to reduce the risk of extended lead-times while trying to maintain an optimal cost structure. All measures enacted to date reflect the Company’s best assessment at this time but will remain flexible and will be revised as necessary or advisable and/or as recommended by public health and governmental authorities.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 16 |
Employee Health and Safety
Centerra continued to develop and implement best international practices and initiatives in 2021. The Company’s safety leadership program, Work Safe | Home Safe has been implemented across the company and continues to be a foundational cornerstone of Centerra’s safety culture. Extensive health and safety training continued to be provided to employees during 2021. Centerra also continued on its journey of safety risk management through the development and implementation of several health and safety risk mitigation measures including the mitigation of fatal risk and critical control management. The success of these initiatives resulted in an overall reduction in the total number of significant incidents by 41% in 2021 compared to 2020.
The Company’s total reportable injury frequency rate in 2021 was 1.02, higher than expectation, primarily due an increase in reportable incidents at the Mount Milligan Mine. The Company has formulated a strategy to improve the current performance by expanding safety leadership training programs and dedicating more professional on-site resources towards improving health and safety performance. Despite the overall disappointing safety score, the Company recognized the following important milestones during the year ended December 31, 2021:
| · | The Öksüt Mine achieved two million work hours without a lost-time injury; |
| · | The Thompson Creek Mine, Langeloth Facility and Kemess Project each achieved one full year without a lost- time injury; |
| · | The Endako Mine achieved eight years without a lost-time injury. |
The Company’s strategic initiatives for 2022 include the ongoing implementation of a new data collection and analysis software application to enhance its reporting function and, the initiation of a corporate level occupational health and industrial hygiene program.
Environmental
Centerra is subject to certain environmental regulations in connection with our exploration, development, mining, and reclamation activities in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Prior to development and expansion, each mining property is subject to environmental assessment and permitting processes, including the engagement with applicable stakeholders. Environmental management plans and internal audits guide the compliance and monitoring programs at each operating site. The Company works closely with regulatory authorities in each jurisdiction where it operates to ensure ongoing compliance. In 2021, there were no reportable releases to the environment.
Centerra actively manages six TSFs. One facility is currently active, three are on care and maintenance, one is entering the closure phase and the final one is in the early stages of the closure phase. Centerra’s TSFs are actively managed to maintain structural performance and ensure worker, environmental and public safety. Centerra’s TSFs are designed in accordance with all applicable dam safety regulations and requirements. In addition, operation of the TSFs is informed by, and routinely checked against, guidance from the Canadian Dam Association and the International Commission on Large Dams. The Company has three types of TSFs: centreline (Mount Milligan Mine and Thompson Creek Mine), modified centreline (Kemess Project) and upstream (Endako Mine). The Öksüt Mine has a heap leach facility and does not have a TSF.
Mining properties have closure and reclamation plans and related financial assurance. The Company adopts a strict regime for mine closure including at least annual updates to its reclamation provisions which are aligned with the International Council on Mining and Metals Mine Closure framework. The Company’s total liability for reclamation and closure cost obligations at December 31, 2021 was estimated to be $337.5 million. The Company provides financial assurance (surety bonds and letters of credit) for reclamation costs related to the operations in North America. As at December 31, 2021, the Company has provided the regulatory authorities with $165.7 million in reclamation bonds and letters of credit for mine closure obligations. For more information please see note 15 to the annual financial statements.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 17 |
Risks That Can Affect Centerra’s Business
Overview
The Company’s business contains significant risk due to the nature of mining, exploration, and development activities. Certain risk factors, including but not limited to those listed below, are similar across the mining industry while others are specific to Centerra. The risk factors below may include details of how Centerra seeks to mitigate these risks where possible. For additional discussion of risk factors please refer to the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2020, which is available on the Company’s website www.centerragold.com, at SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar.
The Company is subject to risks that can have a material effect on the profitability, future cash flow, financial condition of the Company and its stated mineral reserves. Some of these risks relate to the mining industry in general, and others apply to specific properties, operations or planned operations. The Company has implemented an enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program which applies to all of its operations and corporate offices. The program is based on leading international risk management standards and industry best practice. It employs both a bottom-up and top-down approach to identify and address risks from all sources that threaten the achievement of the Company’s objectives.
The ability to deliver on the Company’s vision, strategic objectives and operating guidance depends on Centerra’s ability to understand and appropriately respond to the uncertainties or “risks” the Company faces that may prevent Centerra from achieving the Company’s objectives. In order to achieve this, Centerra:
| · | Maintains a framework that permits the Company to manage risk effectively and in a manner that creates the greatest value through risk informed decision making; |
| · | Integrates a process for managing risk into all the Company’s important decision-making processes so that Centerra reduces the effect of uncertainty on achieving the Company’s objectives; |
| · | Actively monitors key controls the Company relies on to achieve Centerra’s objectives so that they remain in place and are effective at all times; and, |
| · | Provides assurance to senior management and relevant committees of the Board on the effectiveness of key control activities. |
Centerra’s Vice President, Risk & Insurance is responsible for providing the requisite tools, guidance, and leadership of the ERM program. Each operating site and project are responsible for identifying, assessing, mitigating, and monitoring risk. Efforts are coordinated by appointed “Risk Champions” who facilitate the process and provide regular reporting to Centerra’s Vice President, Risk & Insurance.
The risk management program at Centerra considers the full life of mine cycle from exploration through to closure. All aspects of the operation and the Company’s stakeholders are considered when identifying risks. As such, the Company’s risk management program encompasses a broad range of risks including technical, financial, commercial, social, reputational, environmental, governance, health and safety, political and human resources related risks.
Board and Committee Oversight
The Risk Committee of the Board of Directors has oversight responsibilities for the policies, processes and systems for the identification, assessment, and management of the Company’s principal strategic, financial, and operational risks. To ensure consistent communication of risks amongst Board committees, the members of the Risk Committee are comprised of at least one member from each of the other standing committees of the Board. Each of the other Board committees is responsible for overseeing risks related to their area of responsibility and reviewing the policies, standards and actions undertaken to mitigate such risks.
Management Oversight
The Company’s executive team meets regularly with its Vice President, Risk and Insurance to review the risks facing the organization and to discuss the implementation and effectiveness of mitigation actions.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 18 |
Principal Risks
The following section describes the risks that are most material to the Company’s business. This is not a complete list of the potential risks the Company faces; there may be others the Company is not aware of, or risks that the Company feels are not material today that could become material in the future. For a more comprehensive discussion about the Company’s risks, see the most recent Form 40-F/AIF on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities and see the “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information” in this MD&A.
Strategic, Legal and Planning Risks
Strategic, legal and planning risks include political risks associated with the Company’s operations in Turkey, United States and Canada; resource nationalism; reliance on cash flow from its subsidiaries; the impact of changes in, or more aggressive enforcement of laws, regulations and government practices including with respect to the environment; risk of failure of Centerra or its operations to comply with such laws, regulations or government practices and the potentially significant consequences thereof, including potential fines and penalties, loss of permits, interruptions or cessation of operations and loss of reputation; impact of community activism on laws and regulations; increases in contributory demands or business interruption; delays or refusals to grant required permits and licenses; status of the Company’s relationships with local communities; Indigenous claims and consultation issues relating to the Company’s properties which are in proximity to Indigenous communities; disputes with the Kyrgyz Republic relating to the Kumtor Mine; the risks related to outstanding litigation affecting the Company; the impact of any sanctions imposed by Canada, the United States or other jurisdictions against various Turkish individuals and entities; potential defects of title in the Company’s properties that are not known as of the date hereof; the inability of the Company and its subsidiaries to enforce their legal rights in certain circumstances; the presence of a significant shareholder that is a state-owned company of the Kyrgyz Republic; conflicts of interest among its board members; risks related to anti-corruption legislation; Centerra’s future exploration and development activities not being successful; Centerra not being able to replace mineral reserves and resources; risks related to mineral reserves and resources being imprecise; production and cost estimates may be inaccurate; reputational risks, particularly in light of the increase in social media; inability to identify new opportunities and to grow the business; large fluctuations in the Company’s trading price that are beyond the Company’s control or ability to predict and mitigate; potential risks related to kidnapping or acts of terrorism.
Financial Risks
The Company is subject to risks related to its financial position and total liquidity, including sensitivity of the Company’s business to the volatility of gold, copper and other mineral prices; the use of provisionally-priced sales contracts for production at the Mount Milligan Mine; reliance on a few key customers for the gold-copper concentrate at the Mount Milligan Mine and gold doré at the Öksüt Mine; use of commodity derivatives; sensitivity to fuel price volatility; the impact of currency fluctuations; global financial conditions; access to future financing including the impact of environmental, social and corporate governance practices and reporting on the Company’s ability to obtain future financing or accessing capital; the impact of restrictive covenants in the Company’s credit facility which may, among other things, restrict the Company from pursuing certain business activities; the effect of market conditions on the Company’s short-term investments; ability to obtain adequate insurance coverage; and changes to taxation laws in the jurisdictions where the Company operates.
Operational Risks
Mining and metals processing involve significant production and operational risks. Some of these risks are outside of the Company’s control or ability to predict and mitigate. Risks include, but are not limited to, the following: unanticipated ground and water conditions; shortages of water for processing activities; adjacent or adverse land or mineral ownership that results in constraints on current or future mine operations; geological risks, including earthquakes and other natural disasters; wildfires; metallurgical and other processing risks; unusual or unexpected mineralogy or rock formations; ground or slope failures; pit flooding; tailings design or operational issues, including dam breaches, failures or significant seepages; structural cave-ins, wall failures or rock-slides; flooding or fires; equipment failures or performance problems; periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions or operating conditions and other force majeure events; lower than expected ore grades or recovery rates; accidents; changes to, or delays in, transportation routes, including cessation or disruption in rail and shipping networks whether caused by decisions of third party providers or force majeure events (including COVID-19); interruption of energy supply; labour disturbances; the availability of drilling and related equipment in the area where mining operations will be conducted; the failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations; tailings management facilities; exposure of workforce to widespread pandemic (including COVID-19); cyanide use; regulations regarding greenhouse gas emissions and climate change; development and construction costs being over budget; predicting decommissioning and reclamation costs; attracting and retaining qualified personnel; long lead-times required for equipment and supplies given the remote location of some of the Company’s operating properties, and the potential that COVID-19 could disrupt such supply chains; reliance on a limited number of suppliers for certain consumables, equipment and components; and security of critical operating systems.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 19 |
Market Conditions
Commodities
The Company's profitability is materially affected by the market price of metals, primarily the prices of gold, copper and molybdenum. Metal prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control.
| Average spot price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | % Change | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gold (per oz) | 1,795 | 1,876 | (4 | )% | 1,799 | 1,772 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper (per lb) | 4.40 | 3.27 | 35 | % | 4.23 | 2.80 | 51 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Molybdenum (per lb) | 18.89 | 9.01 | 110 | % | 15.98 | 8.68 | 84 | % | ||||||||||||||||
In the fourth quarter of 2021, the gold price remained on average, consistent with the comparative period. There were significant fluctuations in the course of 2021 when the gold price ranged from a low of $1,684 per ounce to a high of $1,943 per ounce as the gold price was impacted by a variety of factors, including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, rising inflation and expectations in the shift in monetary policy by central banks.
In the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2021, the average copper price increased compared to the fourth quarter of 2020 and year ended December 31, 2020. This increase in the average copper price was driven by expectations surrounding global growth and changing shifts in monetary policy. There were significant price fluctuations in the course of 2021, primarily in the first half of 2021, with the copper price trading from a low of $3.51 per pound to a high of $4.86 per pound.
In the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2021, the average molybdenum price increased significantly compared to the fourth quarter of 2020 and year ended December 31, 2020. The initial increase in the price of molybdenum occurred in the second quarter of 2021, with this price increase from $10.95 to $18.95 per pound, stabilizing through the remainder of 2021. The significant increase in the price of molybdenum was impacted by Chinese supply and demand, including the increase in the number of global infrastructure projects.
Foreign Exchange
The Company receives its revenue through the sale of gold, copper and molybdenum in US dollars. The Company has operations in Canada, including its corporate head office, Turkey and the United States.
The exchange rate of the Canadian dollar and Turkish lira relative to the US dollar is an important financial driver for the Company for the following reasons:
| · | all revenues are earned in US dollars; | |
| · | a significant portion, approximately 50%, of operating and capital costs at the Öksüt Mine are incurred in Turkish lira; | |
| · | a majority, approximately 90%, of operating and capital costs at the Mount Milligan Mine are incurred in Canadian dollars; |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 20 |
Approximately 57% (2020 - 43%) of the Company’s combined expenditures from continuing operations were incurred in currencies other than the US dollar during the year ended December 31, 2021.
The performance of these currencies during the periods ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:
| Average market exchange rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | % Change | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
| USD-CAD | 1.26 | 1.30 | (3 | )% | 1.25 | 1.34 | (7 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| USD-Turkish Lira | 11.16 | 7.87 | 42 | % | 8.89 | 7.02 | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
On average, the Canadian dollar strengthened against the US dollar, ending the year at $1.26 while the Turkish lira weakened relative to the US dollar, ending the year at 13.3. The devaluation of the Turkish lira is being offset by persistent high levels of inflation in Turkey, reaching a 19-year high year over year change in 2021 of 36%. The Company expects this trend in Turkey to continue in the near term,
The Company utilizes its foreign exchange hedging program in order to manage its exposure to adverse fluctuations in the Canadian dollar, relative to the US dollar, see “Financial Instruments”. The Company does not currently hedge the Turkish lira.
Diesel Fuel
Fuel costs at Centerra’s continuing operations represent approximately 6% of production costs. The prices for Mount Milligan Mine’s diesel fuel are based on a supply agreement for weekly deliveries and priced at the Prince George Rack Rate. The Prince George Rack Rate reflects general benchmark movements, plus additional costs such as seasonal premiums for winterizing, costs to meet regulatory requirements and transportation costs. Mining operations at the Öksüt Mine are outsourced, and the fuel operating cost is included in the outsourcing contract costs, based on the published local retail diesel market price.
The Company utilizes its diesel hedging program in order to manage its exposure to adverse fluctuations in diesel fuel prices, see “Financial Instruments” section of this MD&A.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 21 |
Financial Performance
As previously disclosed, the Company lost control of the Kumtor Mine in May 2021 and, accordingly, the Kumtor Mine has been classified as a discontinued operation. The financial and operating data below is presented on a continuing operations basis and thus excludes the Kumtor Mine for all periods discussed, unless otherwise noted.
Fourth quarter 2021 compared to fourth quarter 2020
Revenue of $251.1 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $212.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase in revenue was primarily due to an increase in ounces of gold sold at the Mount Milligan Mine and higher average realized copper and molybdenum prices, partially offset by a decrease in ounces of gold sold at the Öksüt Mine, pounds of copper sold at the Mount Milligan Mine and pounds of molybdenum sold at the Molybdenum BU.
Gold production was 91,197 ounces in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to 82,044 ounces in the fourth quarter of 2020. Gold production in the fourth quarter of 2021 included 59,529 ounces of gold from the Mount Milligan Mine, compared to 42,664 ounces in 2020, primarily due to higher gold grades and recoveries, partially offset by slightly lower throughput. The Öksüt Mine produced 31,668 ounces of gold in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to 39,380 ounces of gold in the fourth 2020, primarily due to the site management’s decision to apply lower volume of solution to the ore tonnes stacked on the heap leach in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Copper production at the Mount Milligan Mine was 17.0 million pounds in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to 20.4 million pounds in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower copper grades and mill throughput.
The Langeloth Facility roasted and sold 2.5 million pounds and 2.4 million pounds of molybdenum, respectively, in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to 2.7 million pounds and 3.6 million pounds, respectively in the fourth quarter of 2020. This decrease in the molybdenum roasted and sold was primarily due to a decline in molybdenum concentrate available for roasting, resulting from a decrease in concentrate supply and increased competition for concentrate.
Cost of sales of $163.0 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $124.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to higher gold ounces sold, higher production costs at the Mount Milligan Mine and higher production costs at the Molybdenum BU as a result of higher average molybdenum prices paid to obtain product inventory to be processed.
Gold production costs were $550 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $537 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase in gold production costs was primarily due to an increase in production costs at the Mount Milligan Mine, partially offset by a higher allocation of costs to copper production costs, due to the relative changes in the market prices of gold and copper.
All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG from continuing operations were $591 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $813 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease in all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG was primarily due to an increase in ounces of gold sold, higher average realized copper prices, and a decrease in corporate general and administrative costs.
All-in costs on a by-product basisNG from continuing operations were $732 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $1,144 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG and lower non-sustaining capital expenditures at the Kemess Project and at the Öksüt Mine as mine construction was completed in 2020.
Corporate administration costs of $7.5 million were recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $17.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the effect of the decline in the Company’s share price on the provision for share-based compensation and a decrease in transaction costs. In the fourth quarter of 2020, $2.0 million of transaction costs were incurred in relation to the disposal of the Company’s interest in the Greenstone Partnership.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 22 |
Reclamation expense, which primarily relates to movement in the reclamation liabilities for the Company’s Molybdenum BU sites currently on care and maintenance, was $24.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $9.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase in expense was primarily due to a decline in discount rates applied to the underlying future reclamation costs and an increase in underlying future reclamation cash flows impacted by various factors, including higher inflation and change in timing of reclamation activities.
An impairment reversal of $160.0 million ($117.3 million, net of tax) was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, related to the Mount Milligan Mine, which demonstrated improved and reliable performance since 2019 when the initial impairment loss was recognized. The impairment reversal also reflects the Company’s increased confidence of resource to reserve conversion and increased long-term gold and copper price expectations relative to the prior period. The impairment reversal related to the Mount Milligan Mine represents a full reversal of the impairment taken in the fourth quarter of 2019 allocated to long-lived assets, as adjusted for amortization. The Company did not identify any impairments or impairment reversals in the fourth quarter of 2020.
A gain on sale of Greenstone Partnership of $25.0 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 in relation to a portion of contingent consideration owing to the Company from Orion Mine Finance Group (“Orion”) becoming payable in the future based on a construction decision being made at the Greenstone project.
The company recognized an income tax recovery of $61.6 million, in the fourth quarter of 2021, including deferred income tax recovery of $93.6 million and current income tax expense of $32.0 million, compared to an income tax expense of $2.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2020, including current income tax expense of $1.7 million and deferred income tax expense of $1.2 million. The increase in current income tax expense was due to higher income tax expense related to the Öksüt Mine which had higher taxable earnings, the full utilization of its Investment Incentive Certificate in the year, and a withholding tax expense incurred on dividend distribution. The increase in deferred income tax recovery was primarily due to the partial release of a valuation allowance on deductible temporary differences relating to the Mount Milligan Mine.
Year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020
Revenue of $900.1 million was recognized in 2021 compared to $721.3 million in 2020. The increase in revenue was primarily due to higher gold sold at the Mount Milligan Mine and the Öksüt Mine and higher average realized copper and molybdenum prices, partially offset by a decrease in pounds of copper sold at the Mount Milligan Mine and a decrease in pounds of molybdenum sold at the Molybdenum BU.
Gold production was 308,141 ounces in 2021 compared to 267,923 ounces in 2020. Gold production in 2021 included 196,438 ounces of gold from the Mount Milligan Mine, compared to 161,855 ounces in 2020, primarily due to higher throughput, gold grades and recoveries. The Öksüt Mine, which commenced commercial production on May 31, 2020, produced 111,703 ounces of gold in 2021 compared to 106,068 ounces of gold in 2020, primarily due to higher number of ore tonnes stacked on the heap leach, higher heap leach grade and recoveries.
Copper production at the Mount Milligan Mine was 73.3 million pounds in 2021 compared to 82.8 million pounds in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower copper grades, partially offset by higher throughput.
The Langeloth Facility roasted and sold 10.3 million pounds and 11.5 million pounds of molybdenum, respectively, in 2021 compared to 13.8 million pounds and 13.7 million pounds, respectively, in 2020. The decrease in the molybdenum both roasted and sold was primarily due to a decline in molybdenum concentrate available for roasting, resulting from a decrease in concentrate supply and increased competition for concentrate.
Cost of sales of $608.2 million was recognized in 2021 compared to $505.8 million in 2020. The increase was primarily due to an increase in gold and molybdenum sold and, higher production costs at the Mount Milligan Mine and the Öksüt Mine. In addition, there were higher production costs at the Molybdenum BU related to higher average molybdenum prices paid to obtain product inventory to be processed. The increase in cost of sales was also partially due to higher depreciation, depletion and amortization expense at the Öksüt Mine primarily due to a higher number of tonnes stacked on the heap leach pad and the Mount Milligan Mine primarily due to a decrease in reserves between the periods.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 23 |
Gold production costs from continuing operations were $604 per ounce in 2021 compared to $615 per ounce in 2020. The decrease in gold production costs from continuing operations was primarily due to an increase in gold sold at the Mount Milligan Mine and the Öksüt Mine, partially offset by an increase in production costs at both mines.
All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG from continuing operations were $649 per ounce in 2021 compared to $718 per ounce in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in ounces of gold sold at the Mount Milligan Mine and the Öksüt Mine, higher average realized copper prices and lower corporate administration expenses as a result of a decrease in the share price used to calculate the Company’s share-based compensation liability. Partially offsetting this decrease were higher production costs at the Mount Milligan Mine and Öksüt Mine.
All-in costs on a by-product basisNG were $785 per ounce in 2021 compared to $1,116 per ounce in 2020. The decrease was due to lower all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG and lower non-sustaining capital expendituresNG and care and maintenance costs at the Kemess Project. In addition, there were minimal non-sustaining capital expendituresNG at the Öksüt Mine as the mine construction was completed in 2020.
Corporate administration expenses were $27.1 million in 2021, compared to $45.7 million in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the effect of the decline in the Company’s share price on the provision for share-based compensation.
Reclamation expense, which primarily relates to movement in the reclamation liabilities for the Company’s Molybdenum BU sites currently on care and maintenance, was $23.3 million in 2021 compared to $53.4 million in 2020. The decrease in reclamation expense was primarily due to a larger decline in discount rates applied in 2020. This was partially offset by an increase in underlying future reclamation cash flows in 2021 impacted by various factors, including higher inflation and change in timing of reclamation activities.
An impairment reversal of $160.0 million ($117.3 million net of tax) was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, related to the Mount Milligan Mine, a full reversal of the impairment taken in the fourth quarter of 2019. The Company did not identify any impairments or impairment reversals in 2020.
A gain on sale of $97.3 million was recognized in 2021 on the disposal of the Company’s 50% interest in the Greenstone Partnership. This gain was partially recognized in the first quarter of 2021 when the sale was completed and partially recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 when the construction date was declared for the Greenstone project and an initial contingent payment of $25.0 million became receivable and owing from Orion.
Other non-operating expenses of $23.5 million were recognized in 2021 compared to $6.2 million in 2020. The increase in other non-operating expenses was primarily due to corporate legal costs incurred in connection with the seizure and the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine.
Income tax recovery of $44.0 million, including current income tax expense of $40.1 million and deferred income tax recovery of $84.1 million, was recognized in 2021, compared to an income tax expense of $7.7 million, including current income tax expense of $6.5 million and deferred income tax expense of $1.2 million in 2020. The increase in current income tax expense was primarily due to higher taxable earnings generated by the Öksüt Mine as the benefits from the eligible expenditures under the Investment Incentive Certificate were fully utilized, and withholding tax expense in relation to dividend distributions. The increase in deferred income tax recovery was primarily due to the partial release of a valuation allowance on deductible temporary differences relating to the Mount Milligan Mine, partially offset by deferred income tax expense recorded on the sale of the Company’s interest in the Greenstone Partnership.
Net loss from discontinued operations of $828.7 million was recognized in 2021, compared to net earnings from discontinued operations of $392.4 million in 2020. The decrease in net earnings was primarily due to the loss on the change of control of $926.4 million recognized in the second quarter of 2021 and a shorter operating period as a result of the seizure of the Kumtor Mine in May 2021. Partially offsetting the decrease in net earnings was a gain recognized on the discontinuance of the Kumtor Mine’s fuel hedging program.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 24 |
Financial Instruments
The Company seeks to manage its exposure to fluctuations in diesel fuel prices, commodity prices and foreign exchange rates by entering into derivative financial instruments from time-to-time.
The hedge positions for each of these programs as at December 31, 2021 are summarized as follows:
| Average Strike Price | Settlements (% of exposure hedged) | As
at December 31, 2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Instrument | Unit | Type | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Total position (4) | Fair
value ($000s) |
|||||||||||
| FX Hedges | |||||||||||||||||||||
| USD/CAD zero-cost collars(1) | CAD | Fixed | $1.29/$1.36 | $1.24/$1.29 | $1.25/$1.33 | $242.0 M (40%) | $122.0 M (22%) | $36.0 M (6%) | $400.0 M | 5,257 | |||||||||||
| USD/CAD forward contracts(2) | CAD | Fixed | 1.29 | 1.26 | 1.29 | $160.0 M (24%) | $80.0 M (14%) | $24.0 M (4%) | $264.0 M | 2,022 | |||||||||||
| Total | $402.0 M (64%) | $202.0 M (36%) | $60.0 M (10%) | $664.0 M | 7,279 | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel Hedges | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ULSD zero-cost collars(3) | Barrels | Fixed | $62/$68 | $73/$78 | N/A | 45,100 (30%) | 13,500 (9%) | N/A | 58,600 | 1,563 | |||||||||||
| ULSD swap contracts(2) | Barrels | Fixed | $62 | $79 | $82 | 61,500(40%) | 44,000(28%) | 15,600(10%) | 121,100 | 2,652 | |||||||||||
| Total | 106,600 (70%) | 57,500 (37%) | 15,600 (10%) | 179,700 | 4,215 | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper Hedges: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Copper zero-cost collars(4) | Pounds | Fixed | $3.66/$4.84 | $4.00/$4.89 | N/A | 41.2
M (67%) | 15.9
M (34%) | N/A | 57.1 M | (1,776 | ) | ||||||||||
| Gold/Copper Hedges (Royal Gold deliverables): | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold forward contracts | Ounces | Float | N/A | N/A | N/A | 16,410 | N/A | N/A | 16,410 | 495 | |||||||||||
| Copper forward contracts | Pounds | Float | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.7 M | N/A | N/A | 1.7 M | 94 | |||||||||||
| (1) | Under the currency zero-cost collars, the Company retains the right to buy foreign currency at the contract’s ‘floor’ price if the market price was to fall below this price upon contract expiration, while requiring it to sell foreign currency at the ‘ceiling’ price if the market price was to exceed this price upon expiration. At the end of each contract the Company has the right for financial settlement or physical settlement. |
| (2) | Under the swap and forward contracts, the Company ‘buys’ or ‘sells’ metals, currencies and commodities, at a specified price at a certain future date. |
| (3) | Under the fuel zero-cost collars, the Company retains the right to buy fuel barrels at the contract’s ‘ceiling’ price if the market price was to exceed this price upon contract expiration, while requiring the Company to buy fuel barrels at the ‘floor’ price if the market price fell below this price upon expiration. At the end of each contract there is no exchange of the underlying item and the contract is financially settled. |
| (4) | Under the copper zero-cost collars, the Company retains the right to sell copper at the contract’s ‘floor’ price if the market price fell below this price upon contract expiration, while requiring it to buy copper at the ‘ceiling’ price if the market price were to exceed this price upon expiration. At the end of each contract there is no exchange of the underlying item and the contract is financially settled. |
The realized gain (loss) recorded in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings was as follows:
| Three Months Ended December 31, 2021 | Year Ended December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($millions) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange hedges | 3,789 | 2,415 | 57 | % | 17,543 | 4,266 | 311 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel hedges | 945 | (2,835 | ) | 133 | % | 20,631 | (5,771 | ) | 457 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Copper hedges | (13,150 | ) | (1,359 | ) | (868 | )% | (50,259 | ) | (1,359 | ) | (3,598 | )% | ||||||||||||
During the second quarter of 2021, the Company unwound certain positions that were hedging future fuel purchases at the Kumtor Mine beyond the loss of control event in May 2021. Unwinding these positions resulted in the recognition of realized gain on settlement of $14.2 million, which was recorded in (loss) earnings from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 25 |
As at December 31, 2021, Centerra has not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements with special purpose entities, nor does it have any unconsolidated affiliates.
Balance Sheet Review
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
| ($millions) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | |||||||||
| Total Assets | 2,676.6 | 3,136.0 | (15 | )% | ||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 633.0 | 670.0 | (6 | )% | ||||||||
| Total Equity | 2,043.6 | 2,466.0 | (17 | )% | ||||||||
As a result of the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine in the second quarter of 2021, the Company deconsolidated the assets and liabilities of KGC, a 100%-owned subsidiary that holds the Kumtor Mine, in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial position for the period ended December 31, 2021. The assets and liabilities presented as at December 31, 2020 are inclusive of the Kumtor Mine. The movement in the following financial statement line items between December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was significantly impacted by the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine:
| · | Inventory: derecognition of product inventory of $333.6 million; | |
| · | Property, plant and equipment: derecognition of $629.4 million; | |
| · | Other non-current assets: derecognition of reclamation deposits balance of $52.9 million; | |
| · | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities: derecognition of $63.3 million; and | |
| · | Provision for reclamation: derecognition of $56.5 million. |
Cash as at December 31, 2021 was $947.2 million compared to $545.2 million as at December 31, 2020. The increase was due to the receipt of $210.0 million as consideration for the sale of the Company’s 50% interest in the Greenstone Partnership in the first quarter of 2021, free cash flowNG from continuing operations of $178.4 million and net cash flow from discontinued operations of $47.8 million. The increase in cash was partially offset by dividends paid of $45.0 million in 2021.
Total inventories as at December 31, 2021 were $221.2 million compared to $580.6 million as at December 31, 2020. The decrease in inventories was primarily due to the processing of a large portion of ore stockpiles at the Kumtor Mine prior to the loss of control, the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine as outlined above as well as processing of a large portion of ore stockpiles and timing of concentrate sales at the Mount Milligan Mine. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in inventories at the Langeloth Facility from higher working capital needs as result of higher molybdenum prices and an increase in heap leach inventory balance at the Öksüt Mine from the site management’s decision to apply lower volume of solution to the ore tonnes stacked on the heap leach in the fourth quarter of 2021.
At December 31, 2021, the product inventory balance consisted of 58,333 contained gold ounces and 15.8 million contained pounds of copper in surface stockpiles at the Mount Milligan Mine (4.3 million tonnes of ore at a grade of 0.42 g/t gold and 0.17% copper), of which 30% is expected to be processed in 2022. Additionally, the product inventory balance at the Öksüt Mine consisted of 21,077 contained gold ounces in solution at the absorption, desorption, and recovery plant and 80,102 contained gold ounces on surface and stacked (0.5 million tonnes of ore at a grade of 1.23 g/t gold in surface stockpiles and 1.54 g/t gold stacked on the heap leach pad).
Other current assets at December 31, 2021 were $25.8 million compared to $41.0 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to decrease in the current portion of derivative assets, particularly the Company’s position on foreign exchange contracts.
The carrying value of property, plant and equipment as at December 31, 2021 was $1.27 billion compared to $1.69 billion as at December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine, as outlined above, and depreciation, depletion and amortization of property, plant and equipment in their normal course of operations during the year. Partially offsetting the overall decrease was $214.6 million of additions capitalized to the property, plant and equipment and the $160.0 million impairment reversal at the Mount Milligan Mine.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 26 |
Deferred income tax assets as at December 31, 2021 were $101.3 million compared to nil as at December 31, 2020. The increase was due to the partial release of a valuation allowance on deductible temporary differences related to the Mount Milligan Mine.
Other non-current assets at December 31, 2021 were $32.1 million compared to $77.1 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine, as outlined above, partially offset by $25.0 million receivable from Orion as a result of Greenstone project being approved for construction.
Income taxes payable at December 31, 2021 was $25.3 million compared to $2.5 million at December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to the net impact of current income tax expense and payments during the year, with the most significant balance related to current income tax of the Öksüt Mine.
Deferred income tax liabilities at December 31, 2021 were $54.9 million compared to $39.5 million at December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to the tax effects, including the impact of foreign exchange on temporary differences between accounting and tax basis at the Öksüt Mine and deferred income tax expense of $9.3 million recorded on the sale of the Company’s interest in the Greenstone Partnership.
The provision for reclamation at December 31, 2021 was $337.5 million compared to $352.2 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine, partially offset by a decrease in the discount rates applied to the future cash flows and an increase in the underlying future reclamation cash flows at the Endako Mine, the Thompson Creek Mine and Kemess Project due to variety of factors, including higher inflation, timing of reclamation activities and changes to the closure plan.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s total liquidity position as at December 31, 2021 was $1,347.2 million, representing a cash balance of $947.2 million and $400 million available under a corporate credit facility.
Due to the seizure of the Kumtor Mine and the continuing actions by the Kyrgyz Republic and Kyrgyzaltyn, the Company derecognized the assets and liabilities of the Kumtor Mine in the statements of financial position and presented its financial and operating results prior to the loss of control as discontinued operations for the three months and year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. As a result, the Company’s consolidated cash flow results from continuing operations discussed in this MD&A (including prior periods) exclude the Kumtor Mine’s operations, unless otherwise noted.
Fourth quarter 2021 compared to fourth quarter 2020
Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $61.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to $84.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was primarily due to an unfavourable working capital change at the Molybdenum BU as a result of an increase in product inventory held and a higher average molybdenum price, as well as an increase in income taxes paid of $9.6 million.
Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations of $13.1 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $35.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to proceeds received on the disposition of PP&E, and lower PP&E additions at the Kemess Project and the Öksüt Mine.
Cash used in financing activities during the fourth quarter of 2021 was $13.1 million compared to $15.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in borrowing costs.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 27 |
Year-ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020
Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $270.9 million in 2021 compared to $272.4 million in 2020. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was primarily due to an unfavourable working capital change at the Molybdenum BU as a result of an increase in product inventory held and a higher average molybdenum price, as well as a decrease in earnings from mine operations at the Öksüt Mine and an increase in income taxes paid of $17.2 million in 2021 compared to income taxes refunded of $18.5 million in 2020. Partially offsetting the decrease was an increase in earnings from mine operations at the Mount Milligan Mine and a more favourable change in working capital at the Mount Milligan Mine.
Cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations of $132.5 million was recognized in 2021 compared to cash used in investing activities from continuing operations of $74.6 million in 2020. The increase in cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations was primarily due to the proceeds received from the sale of the Company’s 50% interest in the Greenstone Partnership and proceeds received on the disposition of PP&E, lower PP&E additions related to the construction at the Öksüt Mine as it was completed in 2020, and lower PP&E additions at the Kemess Project. The increase was partially offset by higher PP&E additions at the Mount Milligan Mine primarily due to the expenditures related to the purchase of new mining equipment, TSF development costs and major planned equipment rebuilds and higher PP&E additions at the Öksüt Mine primarily related to the heap leach expansion, capitalized drilling costs, LOM study costs and ADR plant upgrade costs.
Cash used in financing activities of $49.1 million was recognized in 2021 compared to $124.0 million in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the net repayment of the corporate revolving credit facility in 2020 and lower borrowing costs, partially offset by higher dividends paid.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes Centerra’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2021:
| ($millions) | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contractual commitments(1) | $ | 14.8 | $ | 0.2 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 15.0 | ||||||||||||
| Reclamation provisions(2) | 6.2 | — | — | — | 314.7 | 320.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Pension obligations(3) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Lease obligations | 6.6 | 5.8 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 21.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 27.7 | $ | 6.1 | $ | 3.6 | $ | 3.2 | $ | 321.0 | $ | 361.6 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes trade payables and accrued liabilities. | |
| (2) | Mining operations are subject to environmental regulations that require companies to reclaim and remediate land disturbed by mining operations. The Company has submitted closure plans to the appropriate governmental agencies which estimate the nature, extent and costs of reclamation for each of its mining properties. Expected reclamation cash flows are presented above on an undiscounted basis. Reclamation provisions recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are measured at the expected value of future cash flows discounted to their present value using a risk-free interest rate. | |
| (3) | The Company provides defined benefit plans for certain employees. The benefits are generally based on the employee’s years of service, age and level of compensation. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 28 |
2022 Liquidity and Capital Resources Analysis
The Company believes that it has sufficient capital resources to satisfy its 2022 mandatory expenditure commitments (including the contractual obligations set out above) and discretionary expenditure commitments. The following table sets out expected capital requirements and resources for 2022:
| 2022 Mandatory Commitments ($millions): | ||||
| Contractual obligations(1) | $ | 27.7 | ||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (as at December 31, 2021) | 186.8 | |||
| Net income taxes payable (as at December 31, 2021) | 25.3 | |||
| Total 2022 mandatory expenditure commitments | $ | 239.8 | ||
| 2022 Discretionary Commitments(2): | ||||
| Expected capital expendituresNG | $ | 100.0 | ||
| Expected exploration costs(3) | 34.0 | |||
| Total 2022 discretionary expenditure commitments | $ | 134.0 | ||
| Total 2022 mandatory and discretionary expenditure commitments | $ | 373.8 |
| (1) | From the Contractual Obligations table. | |
| (2) | From the Outlook table. | |
| (3) | Excludes exploration costs expected to be capitalized which are included in the expected capital expendituresNG. |
As of December 31, 2021, the Company had adequate capital resources available to satisfy its commitments, which include cash and cash equivalents of $947.2 million and an undrawn $400.0 million Credit Facility. In addition, the Company anticipated funding its commitments through cash provided by operating activities.
Operating Mines and Facilities
Mount Milligan Mine
The Mount Milligan Mine is an open-pit mine located in north central British Columbia, Canada producing a gold and copper concentrate. Production at the Mount Milligan Mine is subject to an arrangement with Royal Gold pursuant to which Royal Gold is entitled to purchase 35% of the gold produced and 18.75% of the copper production at the Mount Milligan Mine for $435 per ounce of gold delivered and 15% of the spot price per metric tonne of copper delivered. To satisfy its obligations under the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement, the Company purchases refined gold and copper warrants and arranges for delivery to Royal Gold. The difference between the cost of the purchases of refined gold and copper warrants and the corresponding amounts payable to the Company under the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement is recorded as a reduction of revenue and not a cost of operating the mine.
Water Update
Stored water inventory at the Mount Milligan Mine’s TSF is critical to the mine’s ability to process ore through the process plant on a sustainable basis. During 2021, the Mount Milligan Mine accessed water from surface water sources and groundwater wells near the TSF. The stored water as at December 31, 2021 is sufficient to enable continuous production for a period of at least 12 months, under normal conditions. The Company expects the water inventory level to decrease during the winter months before being replenished during freshet in the spring.
In January 2022, and subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2021, after significant discussions and consultation with British Columbia regulators, First Nations partners and other stakeholders, the Company obtained an amendment to the Mount Milligan Mine’s environmental assessment certificate which will allow access to long-term surface water sources for the life of the project, subject to the receipt of ordinary course permits.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 29 |
Mount Milligan Mine Financial and Operating Results
| Three months ended December 31 | Year ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($millions, except as noted) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Highlights: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold revenue | 78.9 | 46.7 | 69 | % | 267.9 | 205.0 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper revenue | 61.7 | 53.0 | 16 | % | 227.7 | 178.6 | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Other by-product revenue | 2.0 | 2.6 | (23 | )% | 10.3 | 10.4 | (1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 142.6 | 102.3 | 39 | % | 505.9 | 394.0 | 28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Production costs | 70.0 | 50.4 | 39 | % | 256.8 | 219.8 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 21.7 | 16.4 | 32 | % | 83.9 | 73.1 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from mine operations | 50.9 | 35.5 | 43 | % | 165.2 | 101.1 | 63 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Impairment reversal | (160.0 | ) | — | (100 | )% | (160.0 | ) | — | (100 | )% | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings from operations(1) | 207.8 | 28.4 | 632 | % | 309.2 | 83.9 | 269 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by mine operations | 63.5 | 44.0 | 44 | % | 268.9 | 185.3 | 45 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Free cash flow from mine operations(2) | 46.3 | 30.7 | 51 | % | 201.5 | 150.2 | 34 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | 28.9 | 16.0 | 80 | % | 83.7 | 38.1 | 120 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures - total(2) | 22.4 | 16.6 | 35 | % | 70.8 | 37.8 | 87 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures(2) | 20.2 | 16.6 | 22 | % | 66.7 | 37.8 | 76 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures(2) | 2.2 | — | 100 | % | 4.1 | — | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Highlights: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tonnes mined (000s) | 10,152 | 10,935 | (7 | )% | 43,588 | 41,238 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Tonnes ore mined (000s) | 3,554 | 5,350 | (34 | )% | 18,323 | 19,196 | (5 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Tonnes processed (000s) | 5,448 | 5,498 | (1 | )% | 20,900 | 20,067 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Process plant head grade gold (g/t) | 0.53 | 0.40 | 31 | % | 0.46 | 0.41 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Process plant head grade copper (%) | 0.20 | % | 0.24 | % | (18 | )% | 0.21 | % | 0.26 | % | (16 | )% | ||||||||||||
| Gold recovery (%) | 65.9 | % | 61.2 | % | 8 | % | 65.8 | % | 62.9 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Copper recovery (%) | 74.8 | % | 73.4 | % | 2 | % | 78.3 | % | 77.4 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Concentrate produced (dmt) | 37,161 | 45,943 | (19 | )% | 162,250 | 184,915 | (12 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Gold produced (oz) (3) | 59,529 | 42,664 | 40 | % | 196,438 | 161,855 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Gold sold (oz)(3) | 58,642 | 33,929 | 73 | % | 203,103 | 154,100 | 32 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Average realized gold price - combined ($/oz)(3)(4) | 1,345 | 1,376 | (2 | )% | 1,319 | 1,330 | (1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper produced (000s lbs)(3) | 16,993 | 20,376 | (17 | )% | 73,275 | 82,816 | (12 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper sold (000s lbs)(3) | 17,184 | 18,975 | (9 | )% | 78,017 | 80,477 | (3 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Average realized copper price - combined ($/lb)(3)(4) | 3.59 | 2.79 | 29 | % | 2.92 | 2.22 | 32 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Unit Costs: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold production costs ($/oz) | 670 | 755 | (11 | )% | 683 | 781 | (13 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis ($/oz)(2) | 518 | 488 | 6 | % | 508 | 552 | (8 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basis ($/oz)(2)(5) | 573 | 577 | (1 | )% | 556 | 600 | (7 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Gold - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis ($/oz)(2) | 883 | 1,043 | (15 | )% | 883 | 939 | (6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper production costs ($/lb) | 1.79 | 1.31 | 37 | % | 1.51 | 1.24 | 22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Copper - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis ($/lb)(2) | 2.34 | 1.80 | 30 | % | 1.94 | 1.48 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes exploration costs, marketing and selling costs and impairment reversal. | |
| (2) | Non-GAAP financial measure. See discussion under “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”. | |
| (3) | Mount Milligan production and sales are presented on a 100%-basis. Under the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement, Royal Gold is entitled to 35% of gold ounces and 18.75% of copper. Royal Gold pays $435 per ounce of gold delivered and 15% of the spot price per metric tonne of copper delivered. | |
| (4) | This supplementary financial measure within the meaning of 52-112 is calculated as a ratio of revenue from the consolidated financial statements and units of metal sold. | |
| (5) | Includes the impact from the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement and the impact of copper hedges. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 30 |
Fourth Quarter 2021 compared to Fourth Quarter 2020
Earnings from mine operations of $50.9 million were recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $35.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to higher gold ounces sold and higher average realized copper prices, partially offset by an increase in production costs, higher depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses and lower copper pounds sold.
Mount Milligan Q4 cash provided by mine operations ($ millions)
Cash provided by mine operations of $63.5 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $44.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to higher gold ounces sold and higher average realized copper prices, partially offset by an increase in production costs and lower copper pounds sold.
Free cash flowNG from mine operations of $46.3 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $30.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily due to an increase in cash provided by mine operations, partially offset by an increase in sustaining capital expendituresNG related to the implementation of a tailings pumping system, which will replace the current gravity system. In addition, there were higher non-sustaining capital expendituresNG related related to the stage flotation reactors project in the fourth quarter of 2021.
During the fourth quarter of 2021, mining activities were carried out in phases 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 of the open pit. Total tonnes mined were 10.2 million tonnes in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to 10.9 million tonnes in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease in tonnes mined was primarily due to lower tonnes of ore mined as a result of lower operator availability for mining equipment and consequently higher rehandling from the stockpile to maintain the required throughput.
Total process plant throughput for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 5.4 million tonnes, averaging 59,223 tonnes per calendar day, compared to 5.5 million tonnes, averaging 59,762 tonnes per calendar day in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease in throughput was a result of the longer planned process plant shutdown in the fourth quarter of 2021 which required the full SAG mill lining changeover compared to a less significant shutdown in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Gold production was 59,529 ounces in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to 42,664 ounces in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was due to higher gold grades and recoveries. During the fourth quarter of 2021, the average gold grade and recoveries were 0.53 g/t and 66%, compared to 0.40 g/t and 61% in the fourth quarter of 2020. Total copper production was 17.0 million pounds in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to 20.4 million pounds in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was due to lower copper grades, partially offset by higher recoveries.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 31 |
Gold production costs were $670 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $755 per ounce in fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was due to an increase in gold sold during the fourth quarter of 2021 and a higher allocation of costs to copper production costs, due to the relative changes in the market prices of gold and copper. This was partially offset by higher milling costs due to higher contractor costs associated with the SAG mill liners changeover during the planned shutdown, higher mining costs due to an increase in fuel consumption from higher number of tonnes moved (including tonnes rehandled from the stockpile), higher professional services costs related to mining studies and the impact of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar between periods. In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company was able to minimize the impact of foreign exchange and diesel fuel cost pressures on the Mount Milligan Mine through its hedging program. In addition, the mine was able to partially insulate itself from rising inflation in Canada and COVID-19 related supply chain issues by maintaining increased levels of supplies inventory.
Copper production costs were $1.79 per pound in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $1.31 per pound in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in copper sold, a higher allocation of costs to copper production costs, due to the relative changes in the market prices of gold and copper, and higher production costs outlined above.
Mount Milligan Q4 All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounceNG ($/oz)
All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG were $518 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $488 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to higher production costs and higher sustaining capital expendituresNG related to the implementation of a tailings pumping system, which will replace the current gravity system, partially offset by higher gold ounces sold and higher average realized copper prices.
All-in costs on a by-product basisNG were $573 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $577 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was due to lower exploration expense, partially offset by an increase in all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG and higher non-sustaining capital expendituresNG related to the stage flotation reactors project.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 32 |
Year-ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020
Earnings from mine operations of $165.2 million were recognized in 2021 compared to $101.1 million in 2020. The increase was primarily due to an increase in gold sold and higher average realized copper prices. This was partially offset by an increase in production costs from higher throughput, higher milling costs, and the impact of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar. In addition, there was an increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense primarily due to the decrease in reserves between the periods.
Mount Milligan YTD cash provided by mine operations ($ millions)
Cash provided by mine operations of $268.9 million was recognized in 2021 compared to $185.3 million in 2020. The increase was due to an increase in gold sold, higher average realized copper prices, and a favourable change in working capital, primarily related to the timing of vendor payments between periods. This was partially offset by an increase in production costs.
Free cash flowNG from mine operations of $201.5 million was recognized in 2021 compared to $150.2 million in 2020, The increase was primarily due to an increase in cash provided by mine operations, partially offset by an increase in sustaining capital expendituresNG related to the purchase of mining equipment, TSF development costs and the tailings pumping system project. In addition, there were higher non-sustaining capital expendituresNG related to the stage flotation reactors project in 2021.
During 2021, mining activities were carried out in phases 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 of the open pit. Total tonnes mined were 43.6 million tonnes in 2021 compared to 41.2 million tonnes in 2020. An increase in tonnes mined was primarily due to higher step-out tonnes from more equipment availability in 2021 compared to 2020.
The Mount Milligan Mine reported record mill throughput in 2021, processing 20.9 million tonnes, averaging 57,261 tonnes per calendar day, compared to 20.1 million tonnes in 2020, averaging 54,827 tonnes per calendar day. The higher throughput was primarily due to improved processing efficiency rate and better reliability of the secondary crushing circuit in 2021 compared to 2020.
Gold production was 196,438 ounces in 2021 compared to 161,855 ounces in 2020. The increase was due to higher throughput, gold grades and recoveries. During 2021, the average gold grade was 0.46 g/t and recoveries were 66% compared to 0.41 g/t and 63% in 2020. Total copper production was 73.3 million pounds in 2021 compared to 82.8 million pounds in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower copper grades, partially offset by higher throughput.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 33 |
Gold production costs were $683 per ounce in 2021 compared to $781 per ounce in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in gold sold, partially offset by higher milling costs as a result of higher maintenance costs, and the impact of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar. In 2021, the Company was able to minimize the impact of foreign exchange and diesel fuel cost pressures on the Mount Milligan Mine through its hedging program. In addition, the mine was able to partially insulate itself from rising inflation in Canada and COVID-19 related supply chain issues, by maintaining increased levels of supplies inventory.
Copper production costs were $1.51 per pound in 2021 compared to $1.24 per pound in 2020, primarily as a result of a decrease in copper pounds sold and higher production costs due to the reasons outlined above.
Mount Milligan YTD All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounceNG ($/oz)
All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG were $508 per ounce for 2021 compared to $552 per ounce in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to higher average realized copper prices and an increase in gold ounces sold, partially offset by higher sustaining capital expendituresNG and production costs.
All-in costs on a by-product basisNG were $556 per ounce in 2021 compared to $600 per ounce in 2020. The decrease was due to lower all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG. This was partially offset by an increase in non- sustaining capital expendituresNG relating to the stage flotation reactors project.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 34 |
Öksüt Mine
The Öksüt Mine is located in Turkey approximately 300 kilometres southeast of Ankara and 48 kilometres south of Kayseri, the provincial capital. The nearest administrative centre is at Develi, located approximately 10 kilometres north of the mine site. The Öksüt Mine achieved commercial production on May 31, 2020. Prior to achieving commercial production, revenue from the sale of gold ounces was deducted from the cost of related property, plant and equipment and the associated production costs were added to the related property, plant and equipment.
Öksüt Mine Financial and Operating Results
| Three months ended December 31 | Year ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($millions, except as noted) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Highlights: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | 56.9 | 74.3 | (23 | )% | 199.4 | 186.5 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Production costs | 10.4 | 13.8 | (25 | )% | 51.1 | 35.2 | 45 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 7.8 | 7.1 | 10 | % | 30.2 | 16.0 | 89 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from mine operations | 38.7 | 53.4 | (28 | )% | 118.1 | 135.3 | (13 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from operations(1) | 39.2 | 52.4 | (25 | )% | 116.4 | 133.6 | (13 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by mine operations | 39.5 | 61.8 | (36 | )% | 131.7 | 146.1 | (10 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Free cash flow from mine operations(2) | 35.3 | 46.5 | (24 | )% | 111.6 | 105.2 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | 9.3 | 38.4 | (76 | )% | 24.9 | 69.3 | (64.1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures - total(2) | 4.3 | 15.3 | (72 | )% | 19.6 | 43.8 | (55 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures(2) | 4.1 | 9.1 | (55 | )% | 18.8 | 13.4 | 40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures(2) | 0.2 | 6.2 | (97 | )% | 0.8 | 30.4 | (97 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Highlights: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tonnes mined (000s) | 3,820 | 4,440 | (14 | )% | 15,251 | 15,115 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Tonnes ore mined (000s) | 1,410 | 115 | 1128 | % | 4,352 | 2,578 | 69 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Ore mined - grade (g/t) | 2.18 | 1.91 | 14 | % | 1.54 | 1.68 | (8 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Ore crushed (000s) | 1,047 | 637 | 64 | % | 3,947 | 3,428 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Tonnes of ore stacked (000s) | 1,064 | 952 | 12 | % | 3,969 | 3,445 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Heap leach grade (g/t) | 2.42 | 0.78 | 210 | % | 1.54 | 1.40 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Heap leach contained ounces stacked | 82,943 | 23,950 | 246 | % | 195,990 | 154,948 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Gold produced (oz) | 31,668 | 39,380 | (20 | )% | 111,703 | 106,068 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Gold sold (oz)(3) | 31,670 | 39,380 | (20 | )% | 111,654 | 105,503 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Average realized gold price ($/oz)(4) | 1,796 | 1,887 | (5 | )% | 1,786 | 1,768 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Unit Costs: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold production costs ($/oz) | 328 | 350 | (6 | )% | 457 | 356 | 28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis ($/oz)(2) | 495 | 658 | (25 | )% | 668 | 523 | 28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basis ($/oz)(2) | 501 | 841 | (40 | )% | 694 | 848 | (18 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes exploration costs. | |
| (2) | Non-GAAP financial measure. See discussion under “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”. | |
| (3) | Includes 6,654 ounces sold before the mine was in commercial production. | |
| (4) | This supplementary financial measure, within the meaning of 52-112, is calculated as a ratio of revenue from the consolidated financial statements and units of metal sold. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 35 |
Fourth Quarter 2021 compared to Fourth Quarter 2020
Earnings from mine operations were $38.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to $53.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower gold revenue as a result of both a decrease in ounces of gold sold and slightly lower average realized gold prices. The decrease was partially offset by lower production costs, primarily due to a decrease in ounces of gold sold and the weakening of the Turkish lira relative to the US dollar between the periods which offset the impact of rapidly increasing inflation starting in December 2021.
Öksüt Mine Q4 cash provided by mine operations ($ millions)
Cash provided by mine operations of $39.5 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to $61.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in gold revenues and higher cash taxes paid, partially offset by a decrease in production costs.
Free cash flowNG from mine operations of $35.3 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to $46.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cash provided by mine operations, partially offset by lower sustaining capital expendituresNG from a decrease in capitalized stripping costs and lower non- sustaining capital expendituresNG as the construction of the Öksüt Mine was completed in 2020.
Mining activities in the fourth quarter of 2021 were carried out in phases 2 and 4 of the Keltepe pit and phase 2 of the Güneytepe pit. Total tonnes mined were 3.8 million tonnes in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to 4.4 million tonnes in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease in tonnes mined was primarily due to higher downtime in the pit from unfavourable weather conditions, including heavy fog, poor visibility and snow.
Processing activities in the fourth quarter of 2021 were focused on the preparation, stacking and irrigation of the heap leach pad. In the fourth quarter of 2021 the Öksüt Mine stacked 1.1 million tonnes at an average grade of 2.42 g/t, containing 82,943 ounces of gold, compared to 1.0 million tonnes stacked at an average grade of 0.78 g/t, containing 23,950 ounces of gold in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Gold production was 31,668 ounces in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to 39,380 ounces in the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily due to the site management’s decision to apply lower volume of solution to the ore tonnes stacked on the heap leach in the fourth quarter of 2021. Gold production associated with the tonnes of ore stacked but not leached in the fourth quarter of 2021 is expected to occur early in 2022 as solution is applied.
Gold production costs were $328 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $350 in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the weakening of the Turkish lira relative to the US dollar, partially offset by a decrease in ounces of gold sold.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 36 |
Öksüt Mine Q4 All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounceNG ($/oz)
All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG were $495 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $658 in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower production costs and lower sustaining capital expenditures from lower capitalized stripping costs, partially offset by lower ounces of gold sold.
All-in costs on a by-product basisNG were $501 per ounce in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $841 in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease was due to lower all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG and lower non-sustaining capital expenditures as the construction of the Öksüt Mine was completed in 2020.
Year-ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
As the Öksüt Mine achieved commercial production on May 31, 2020, financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2021 may not be comparable to the results for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Earnings from mine operations were $118.1 million in 2021 compared with $135.3 million in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization expense from a longer operating period and higher number of ore tonnes stacked on the heap leach pad. The increase in production costs was also due to a lower strip ratio, resulting in lower portion of mining costs being capitalized and higher community and social spending undertaken in the first full year of commercial production. The decrease was partially offset by the weakening of the Turkish lira relative to the US dollar between periods.
Cash provided by mine operations was $131.7 million in 2021 compared with $146.1 million in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in production costs and an increase in income taxes paid, partially offset by an increase in gold revenue from higher ounces of gold sold.
Free cash flowNG from mine operations was $111.6 million in 2021 compared with $105.2 million in 2020. The increase was primarily due to lower non-sustaining capital expenditures, as the mines construction was completed in 2020, partially offset by lower cash provided by mine operations and higher sustaining capital expendituresNG related to the heap leach expansion, capitalized drilling costs, and ADR plant upgrades.
Processing activities in 2021 were focused on the preparation, stacking and irrigation of the heap leach pad, with 4.0 million tonnes stacked at an average grade of 1.54 g/t containing 195,990 ounces of gold compared with 3.4 million tonnes stacked in 2020 at an average grade of 1.40 g/t containing 154,948 ounces of gold.
Gold production was 111,703 ounces in 2021 compared to 106,068 ounces in 2020, primarily due to higher number of ore tonnes stacked on the heap leach pad and higher average gold grade stacked, partially offset by the site management’s decision to apply lower volume of solution to the ore tonnes stacked on the heap leach in the fourth quarter of 2021.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 37 |
Gold production costs were $457 per ounce in 2021 compared with $356 per ounce in 2020. The increase was primarily due to lower strip ratio, resulting in lower portion of mining costs being capitalized and higher community and social spending related to various one-off initiatives in the local community, some of which were undertaken in the first full year of commercial production. The increase was partially offset by an increase in ounces of gold sold.
All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG were $668 per ounce in 2021 compared with $523 per ounce in 2020. The increase was primarily due to higher production costs and higher sustaining capital expendituresNG, partially offset by an increase in ounces of gold sold.
All-in costs on a by-product basisNG were $694 per ounce in 2021 compared with $848 per ounce in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower non-sustaining capital expenditures as the construction of the Öksüt Mine was completed in 2020, partially offset by higher all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basisNG.
Molybdenum Business Unit
The Molybdenum BU includes the Langeloth Facility in Pennsylvania and two North American molybdenum mines that are currently on care and maintenance: the Thompson Creek Mine in Idaho and the 75%-owned Endako Mine in British Columbia. The Thompson Creek Mine operates a molybdenum beneficiation circuit to treat molybdenum concentrates to supplement the concentrate feed sourced directly for the Langeloth Facility. This beneficiation process allows the Company to upgrade high copper content molybdenum concentrate, purchased from third parties, into upgraded products which are then sold in the metallurgical and chemical markets.
Molybdenum BU Financial and Operating Results
| Three months ended December 31 | Year ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($millions, except as noted) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Highlights: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Molybdenum revenue | 48.6 | 33.7 | 44 | % | 184.5 | 132.3 | 40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Other revenue | 2.9 | 1.7 | 74 | % | 10.2 | 8.5 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 51.6 | 35.4 | 46 | % | 194.8 | 140.8 | 38 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Production costs | 51.5 | 35.0 | 47 | % | 179.7 | 154.9 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 1.5 | 1.7 | (12 | )% | 6.4 | 6.8 | (6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| (Loss) earnings from mine operations | (1.2 | ) | (1.3 | ) | 6 | % | 8.7 | (20.9 | ) | (142 | )% | |||||||||||||
| Care and maintenance costs - Molybdenum mines | 4.3 | 3.1 | 37 | % | 14.6 | 12.9 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Reclamation expense | 24.1 | 9.3 | (159 | )% | 23.2 | 53.4 | (57 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Other operating expenses | 0.8 | 0.6 | 31 | % | 2.2 | 2.1 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Net loss from operations | (30.4 | ) | (14.1 | ) | (115 | )% | (31.4 | ) | (89.3 | ) | (65 | )% | ||||||||||||
| Cash (used in) provided by operations | (15.8 | ) | (3.8 | ) | 316 | % | (37.3 | ) | 11.4 | (427 | )% | |||||||||||||
| Free cash flow (deficit) from operations(1) | (17.2 | ) | (6.2 | ) | 177 | % | (39.8 | ) | 5.6 | 811 | % | |||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | 1.4 | 3.0 | (53 | )% | 2.5 | 6.5 | 62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total capital expenditures(1) | 1.4 | 2.3 | (39 | )% | 2.5 | 5.8 | (57 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Highlights: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mo purchased (lbs) | 2,941 | 2,924 | 1 | % | 10,650 | 13,577 | (22 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Mo roasted (lbs) | 2,475 | 2,712 | (9 | )% | 10,286 | 13,760 | (25 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Mo sold (lbs) | 2,361 | 3,610 | (35 | )% | 11,461 | 13,667 | (16 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
| Average market Mo price ($/lb) | 18.89 | 9.01 | 110 | % | 15.98 | 8.68 | 84 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Non-GAAP financial measure. See discussion under “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 38 |
Fourth Quarter 2021 compared to Fourth Quarter 2020
Loss from mine operations of $1.2 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to a loss of $1.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The decrease in loss from mine operations was primarily due to increased sales margin from rising molybdenum prices and the effect of various cost control measures.
Cash used in operations of $15.8 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to $3.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase in cash used in operations is primarily due to an unfavourable working capital change from an increase in product inventory and as a result of the higher average molybdenum prices paid to obtain that inventory.
Free cash flow deficit from operationsNG of $17.2 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to $6.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increased deficit was primarily due to lower cash provided by operations.
The Langeloth Facility roasted and sold 2.5 million pounds and 2.4 million pounds of molybdenum, respectively, in the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to 2.7 million pounds and 3.6 million pounds, respectively in the fourth quarter of 2020. This decrease in the molybdenum roasted and sold was primarily due to a decline in molybdenum concentrate available for roasting, resulting from a decrease in concentrate supply and increased competition for concentrate.
Reclamation expense was $24.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to $9.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase in expense was primarily due to a decline in the estimated discount rates applied to the underlying future reclamation costs and an increase in estimated future reclamation cash flows impacted by various factors, including higher inflation.
Year-ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020
Earnings from mine operations of $8.7 million were recognized in 2021 compared to a loss from mine operations of $20.9 million in 2020. The increase was primarily due to the increased sales margin from rising molybdenum prices and a non-cash write-down related to product inventory recorded in 2020 of $13.6 million.
Cash used by operations was $37.3 million in 2021 compared to cash provided by operations of $11.4 million in 2020. The decline was primarily due to an unfavourable working capital change related to product inventory purchases at higher average molybdenum prices and a $22.8 million non-recurring tax refund received in 2020.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 39 |
Free cash flow deficit from operationsNG of $39.8 million was recognized in 2021 compared to $5.6 million in 2020, primarily due to lower cash provided by operations, as described above.
The Langeloth Facility roasted and sold 10.3 million pounds and 11.5 million pounds of molybdenum, respectively, in 2021 compared to 13.8 million pounds and 13.7 million pounds, respectively, in 2020. The decrease in the molybdenum both roasted and sold was primarily due to a decline in molybdenum concentrate available for roasting, resulting from a decrease in concentrate supply and increased competition for concentrate.
Discontinued Operations
Kumtor Mine
As a result of the events described in the Recent Events and Developments section, the Kumtor Mine was reclassified as a discontinued operation in the second quarter of 2021. Consequently, the Company is only presenting 2021 financial and operating results pertaining to the period up to the date that the loss of control occurred. Therefore, the results may not be comparable between reporting periods.
Kumtor Mine Financial and Operating Results
| Three months ended December 31 | Year ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||
| ($millions, except as noted) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
| Financial Highlights: | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | — | 179.6 | 264.1 | 988.9 | ||||||||||||
| Production costs | — | 43.9 | 72.6 | 202.1 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | — | 38.5 | 57.9 | 209.5 | ||||||||||||
| Standby costs | — | — | — | 6.7 | ||||||||||||
| Earnings from mine operations | — | 97.2 | 133.6 | 570.6 | ||||||||||||
| Loss on the change of control of the Kumtor Mine | — | — | (926.4 | ) | — | |||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | — | 63.6 | (828.7 | ) | 392.4 | |||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations | — | 97.6 | 143.9 | 657.6 | ||||||||||||
| Cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations | — | 69.5 | 96.1 | 228.7 | ||||||||||||
| Net cash flow from discontinued operations | — | 28.1 | 47.8 | 428.9 | ||||||||||||
| Free cash flow from discontinued operations(1) | — | 25.1 | 53.7 | 434.9 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Highlights: | ||||||||||||||||
| Tonnes mined (000s) | — | 42,733 | 74,261 | 103,735 | ||||||||||||
| Tonnes ore mined (000s) | — | 115 | 1,298 | 705 | ||||||||||||
| Tonnes processed (000s) | — | 1,563 | 2,343 | 6,323 | ||||||||||||
| Process plant head grade (g/t) | — | 2.11 | 2.52 | 3.27 | ||||||||||||
| Recovery (%)(2) | — | 74.2 | % | 71.5 | % | 81.4 | % | |||||||||
| Gold produced (oz) | — | 90,402 | 139,830 | 556,136 | ||||||||||||
| Gold sold (oz) | — | 96,641 | 147,800 | 569,213 | ||||||||||||
| Unit Costs: | ||||||||||||||||
| Gold production costs ($/oz) | — | 311 | 491 | 355 | ||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis ($/oz)(1) | — | 778 | 929 | 746 | ||||||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basis ($/oz)(1) | — | 1,062 | 1,414 | 1,047 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Non-GAAP measure. See discussion under “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”. | |
| (2) | Metallurgical recoveries are based on recovered gold, not produced gold. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 40 |
Sale of Interest in Greenstone Partnership
On January 19, 2021, the Company completed the sale of its 50% interest in the Greenstone Partnership with final cash consideration received of $210.0 million, net of adjustments, and recognized an initial gain on sale of $72.3 million (excluding any contingent consideration). Pursuant to an agreement dated December 15, 2020, with Orion and Premier Gold Mines Limited, the Company was entitled to received further contingent consideration, payable upon making a construction decision and upon achieving certain production milestones.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Greenstone project was approved for construction and thus the initial contingency payment of $25.0 million became receivable and owing from Orion, payable no later than December 2023. As a result, the Company recognized an additional gain on the sale of its interest in Greenstone Partnership of $25.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2021.
The remaining contingent payments are payable no later than 30 days following the date on which a cumulative production milestone of (i) 250,000 ounces; (ii) 500,000 ounces; and, (iii) 750,000 ounces have been achieved. The amounts are payable in US dollars, equal to the product of 11,111 and the 20-day average gold market price on the business day immediately prior to the date of the payment.
Quarterly Results – Previous Eight Quarters
As a result of the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine, the Company deconsolidated the results of the Kumtor Mine and presented its financial results as a discontinued operation, separate from the Company’s consolidated financial results. Accordingly, the quarterly results presented below were updated retrospectively to reflect the impact of discontinued operations accounting.
| $millions, except per share data | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| quarterly data unaudited | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | 251 | 221 | 202 | 226 | 212 | 251 | 130 | 128 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations | 275 | 28 | 33 | 111 | 31 | 82 | (39 | ) | (66 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations | 0.93 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.37 | 0.10 | 0.28 | (0.13 | ) | (0.22 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations | 0.92 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.10 | 0.26 | (0.13 | ) | (0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) | 275 | 28 | (852 | ) | 167 | 95 | 206 | 81 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | 0.93 | 0.09 | (2.87 | ) | 0.57 | 0.32 | 0.70 | 0.27 | 0.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | 0.92 | 0.09 | (2.87 | ) | 0.55 | 0.32 | 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Related Party Transactions
Kyrgyzaltyn
The breakdown of sales transactions in the normal course of business with Kyrgyzaltyn, prior to the loss of control event in respect of the Kumtor Mine, is as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Gross gold and silver sales to Kyrgyzaltyn | $ | 265,407 | $ | 995,111 | ||||
| Deduct: refinery and financing charges | (1,248 | ) | (6,164 | ) | ||||
| Net revenue received from Kyrgyzaltyn(1) | $ | 264,159 | $ | 988,947 | ||||
| (1) | Presented in results from discontinued operations. |
Sojitz Corporation
The Endako Mine is operated as a joint operation between the Company, holding a 75% interest, and Sojitz Corporation (“Sojitz”), a Japanese company, holding a 25% interest. The Langeloth Facility which is part of the Molybdenum BU segment sells refined molybdenum concentrate product to Sojitz.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 41 |
The breakdown of the Company’s transactions in the normal course of business with Sojitz is as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Sales to Sojitz | $ | 24,780 | $ | 12,469 | ||||
| Deduct: commission charges | (305 | ) | (253 | ) | ||||
| Revenue(1) | $ | 24,475 | $ | 12,216 | ||||
| (1) | Amount receivable from Sojitz as at December 31, 2021 was $2.6 million (December 31, 2020 - $0.3 million ). |
Transactions with key management personnel
The Company transacts with key management personnel, who have authority and responsibility to plan, direct and control the activities of the Company and receive compensation for services rendered in that capacity. Key management personnel include members of the Board of Directors and members of the senior leadership team.
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, remuneration to key management personnel was as follows:
Compensation of key management personnel
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Director fees earned and other compensation | $ | 754 | $ | 820 | ||||
| Salaries and benefits | 7,830 | 6,354 | ||||||
| Share-based compensation | 1,894 | 12,275 | ||||||
| Total compensation | $ | 10,478 | $ | 19,449 | ||||
Accounting Estimates, Policies and Changes
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Management’s estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Any changes or revisions to estimates and underlying assumptions are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. Changes to these critical accounting estimates could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The key sources of estimation uncertainty and judgment used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that might have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying value of assets and liabilities and (loss) earnings are outlined in Note 4 of the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, is responsible for the design of disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal controls over financial reporting (“ICFR”). Centerra adheres to the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission’s (“COSO”) revised 2013 Internal Control Framework for the design of its ICFR. There was no material change to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during 2021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
The evaluation of DC&P and ICFR was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including Centerra’s CEO and CFO. Based on these evaluations, the CEO and the CFO concluded that the design and operation of these DC&P and ICFR were effective throughout 2021.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 42 |
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company asked all of its corporate office staff and many site administrative staff at regional, mine site and exploration offices to work from home. Most of these offices were subsequently re- opened, under new hygiene and physical distancing protocols; however, employees whose work does not require physical presence in the office can continue to work remotely. This change requires certain processes and controls that were previously done or documented manually to be completed and retained in electronic form. The Company continues to monitor whether remote work arrangements have adversely affected the Company’s ability to maintain internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Despite the changes required by the current environment, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls during the year ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
This MD&A contains “specified financial measures” within the meaning of NI 52-112, specifically the non-GAAP financial measures, non-GAAP ratios and supplementary financial measures described below. Management believes that the use of these measures assists analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the Company in understanding the costs associated with producing gold and copper, understanding the economics of gold and copper mining, assessing operating performance, the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and on an overall Company basis, and for planning and forecasting of future periods. However, the measures have limitations as analytical tools as they may be influenced by the point in the life cycle of a specific mine and the level of additional exploration or expenditures a company has to make to fully develop its properties. The specified financial measures used in this MD&A do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers, even as compared to other issuers who may be applying the World Gold Council (“WGC”) guidelines. Accordingly, these specified financial measures should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for, analysis of the Company’s recognized measures presented in accordance with IFRS.
Definitions
As a result of the seizure of the Kumtor Mine by the Kyrgyz Republic on May 15, 2021 and the loss of control of the mine, the Company presented the results from the Kumtor Mine as a discontinued operation, separate from the Company’s continuing operations. Consequently, the following non-GAAP financial measures were added in this MD&A: adjusted net earnings from continuing operations; free cash flow from continuing operations and adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations, and the following non-GAAP ratio was added in this MD&A: adjusted net earnings from continuing operations per common share (basic and diluted). These measures are calculated in a similar fashion as the equivalent non-GAAP financial measures and ratios presented on a total basis, inclusive of both continuing operations and discontinued operations.
The following is a description of the non-GAAP financial measures, non-GAAP ratios and supplementary financial measures used in this MD&A:
| • | All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis per ounce is a non-GAAP ratio calculated as all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis divided by ounces of gold sold. All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis is a non- GAAP financial measure calculated as the aggregate of production costs as recorded in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings, refining and transport costs, cash component of capitalized stripping and sustaining capital expenditures, lease payments related to sustaining assets, corporate general and administrative expenses, accretion expenses, asset retirement depletion expenses, copper and silver revenue and the associated impact of hedging by-product sales revenue (added in the current year and applied retrospectively to the previous year). When calculating all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis, all revenue received from the sale of copper from the Mount Milligan Mine, as reduced by the effect of the copper stream, is treated as a reduction of costs incurred. All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis for the Kumtor Mine excludes revenue-based taxes. A reconciliation of all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis to the nearest IFRS measure is set out below. Management uses these measures to monitor the cost management effectiveness of each of its operating mines. |
| • | All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis per ounce of gold or per pound of copper, is a non-GAAP ratio calculated as all-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis divided by ounces of gold or pounds of copper sold, as applicable. All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis is a non-GAAP financial measure based on an allocation of production costs between copper and gold based on the conversion of copper production to equivalent ounces of gold. The Company uses a conversion ratio for calculating gold equivalent ounces for its copper sales calculated by multiplying the copper pounds sold by estimated average realized copper price and dividing the resulting figure by estimated average realized gold price. For the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2021, 375 pounds and 452 pounds, respectively, of copper were equivalent to one ounce of gold. All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis for the Kumtor Mine excludes revenue-based taxes. A reconciliation of all-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis to the nearest IFRS measure is set out below. Management uses these measures to monitor the cost management effectiveness of each of its operating mines. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 43 |
| • | Sustaining capital expenditures and Non-sustaining capital expenditures are non-GAAP financial measures. Sustaining capital expenditures are defined as those expenditures required to sustain current operations and exclude all expenditures incurred at new operations or major projects at existing operations where these projects will materially benefit the operation. Non-sustaining capital expenditures are primarily costs incurred at ‘new operations’ and costs related to ‘major projects at existing operations’ where these projects will materially benefit the operation. A material benefit to an existing operation is considered to be at least a 10% increase in annual or life of mine production, net present value, or reserves compared to the remaining life of mine of the operation. A reconciliation of sustaining capital expenditures and non-sustaining capital expenditures to the nearest IFRS measures is set out below. Management uses the distinction of the sustaining and non-sustaining capital expenditures as an input into the calculation of all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce. |
| • | All-in costs on a by-product basis per ounce is a non-GAAP ratio calculated as all-in costs on a by-product basis divided by ounces sold. All-in costs on a by-product basis is a non-GAAP financial measure which includes all- in sustaining costs on a by-product basis. exploration and study costs, non-sustaining capital expenditures, care and maintenance and predevelopment costs. All-in costs on a by-product basis per ounce for the Kumtor Mine include revenue-based taxes. A reconciliation of all-in costs on a by-product basis to the nearest IFRS measures is set out below. Management uses these measures to monitor the cost management effectiveness of each of its operating mines. |
| • | Adjusted net earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated by adjusting net (loss) earnings as recorded in the consolidated statements of (loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income for items not associated with ongoing operations. The Company believes that this generally accepted industry measure allows the evaluation of the results of continuing income-generating capabilities and is useful in making comparisons between periods. This measure adjusts for the impact of items not associated with ongoing operations. A reconciliation of adjusted net earnings to the nearest IFRS measures is set out below. Management uses this measure to monitor and plan for the operating performance of the Company in conjunction with other data prepared in accordance with IFRS. |
| • | Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated by adjusting net (loss) earnings from continuing operations as recorded in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income for items not associated with continuing operations. This measure adjusts for the impact of items not associated with continuing operations. A reconciliation of adjusted net earnings from continuing operations to the nearest IFRS measures is set out below. Management uses this measure to monitor and plan for the operating performance of continuing operations of the Company in conjunction with other data prepared in accordance with IFRS. |
| • | Free cash flow from continuing operations is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations less property, plant and equipment additions. A reconciliation of free cash flow from continuing operations to the nearest IFRS measures is set out below. Management uses this measure to monitor the amount of cash available to reinvest in the Company and allocate for shareholder returns. |
| • | Free cash flow from mine operations is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as cash provided by mine operations less property, plant and equipment additions. A reconciliation of free cash flow from mine operations to the nearest IFRS measures is set out below. Management uses this measure to monitor the degree of self- funding of each of its operating mines and facilities. |
| • | Free cash flow from discontinued operations is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations less property, plant and equipment additions associated with discontinued operations. A reconciliation of free cash flow from discontinued operations to the nearest IFRS measures is set out below. |
| • | Adjusted free cash flow from operations is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as free cash flow adjusted for items not associated with ongoing operations. A reconciliation of adjusted free cash flow from operations to the nearest IFRS measures is set out below. Management uses this measure to monitor the amount of cash from ongoing operations available to reinvest in the Company and allocate for shareholder returns. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 44 |
| • | Average realized gold price is a supplementary financial measure calculated by dividing the different components of gold sales (including third party sales, mark-to-market adjustments, final pricing adjustments and the fixed amount received under the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement) by the number of ounces sold. Management uses this measure to monitor its sales of gold ounces against the average market gold price. |
| • | Average realized copper price is a supplementary financial measure calculated by dividing the different components of copper sales (including third party sales, mark-to-market adjustments, final pricing adjustments and the fixed amount received under the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement) by the number of pounds sold. Management uses this measure to monitor its sales of gold ounces against the average market copper price. |
| • | Total liquidity is a supplementary financial measure calculated as cash and cash equivalents and amount available under the corporate credit facility. Management uses this measure to determine if the Company can meet all of its commitments, execute on the business plan, and to mitigate the risk of economic downturns. |
Certain unit costs, including all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis (including and excluding revenue-based taxes) per ounce, are non-GAAP ratios which include as a component certain non-GAAP financial measures including all-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis which can be reconciled as follows:
| Three months ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated(2) | Mount Milligan | Öksüt | Kumtor | ||||||||||||||
| (Unaudited - $millions, unless otherwise specified) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||
| Production costs attributable to gold | 49.7 | 39.4 | 39.3 | 25.6 | 10.4 | 13.8 | — | 43.9 | |||||||||
| Production costs attributable to copper | 30.7 | 24.9 | 30.7 | 24.9 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Total production costs excluding molybdenum segment, as reported | 80.4 | 64.3 | 70.0 | 50.5 | 10.4 | 13.8 | — | 43.9 | |||||||||
| Adjust for: | |||||||||||||||||
| Third party smelting, refining and transport costs | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.1 | — | — | 1.1 | |||||||||
| By-product and co-product credits | (63.8 | ) | (55.5 | ) | (63.8 | ) | (55.5 | ) | — | — | — | (1.4 | ) | ||||
| Community costs related to current operations | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.2 | |||||||||
| Adjusted production costs | 18.9 | 11.1 | 8.4 | (2.7 | ) | 10.5 | 13.8 | — | 45.8 | ||||||||
| Corporate general administrative and other costs | 7.3 | 17.5 | (0.1 | ) | 0.3 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Reclamation and remediation - accretion (operating sites) | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.0 | — | — | 0.7 | |||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures | 24.3 | 25.7 | 20.2 | 16.6 | 4.1 | 9.1 | — | 63.4 | |||||||||
| Sustaining leases | 1.4 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 3.0 | — | — | |||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis | 53.4 | 59.7 | 30.3 | 16.6 | 15.7 | 25.9 | — | 109.9 | |||||||||
| Revenue-based taxes | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.2 | |||||||||
| Exploration and study costs | 6.4 | 7.5 | 1.1 | 3.0 | — | 1.0 | — | 5.5 | |||||||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures(1) | 2.4 | 10.8 | 2.2 | — | 0.2 | 6.2 | — | 9.4 | |||||||||
| Care and maintenance costs and pre-development costs | 4.0 | 5.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basis | 66.2 | 83.8 | 33.6 | 19.6 | 15.9 | 33.1 | — | 150.0 | |||||||||
| Ounces sold (000s) | 90.3 | 73.3 | 58.6 | 33.9 | 31.7 | 39.4 | — | 141.3 | |||||||||
| Pounds sold (millions) | 17.2 | 19.0 | 17.2 | 19.0 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Gold production costs ($/oz) | 550 | 537 | 670 | 755 | 328 | 350 | — | 311 | |||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis ($/oz) | 591 | 813 | 518 | 488 | 495 | 658 | — | 778 | |||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basis ($/oz) | 732 | 1,144 | 573 | 577 | 501 | 841 | — | 1,062 | |||||||||
| Gold - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis ($/oz) | 829 | 1,070 | 883 | 1,043 | 495 | 658 | — | 778 | |||||||||
| Copper production costs ($/pound) | 1.79 | 1.31 | 1.79 | 1.31 | n/a | n/a | — | n/a | |||||||||
| Copper - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis ($/pound) | 2.34 | 1.80 | 2.34 | 1.80 | n/a | n/a | — | n/a | |||||||||
| (1) | Non-sustaining capital expenditures are distinct projects designed to have a significant increase in the net present value of the mine. In the current quarter, non-sustaining capital expenditures include costs related primarily to the installation of the staged flotation reactors at the Mount Milligan Mine. | |
| (2) | Presented on a continuing operations basis, excluding the results from the Kumtor Mine. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 45 |
| Year ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated(2) | Mount Milligan | Öksüt | Kumtor(3) | ||||||||||||||
| (Unaudited - $millions, unless otherwise specified) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||
| Production costs attributable to gold | 189.9 | 155.6 | 138.8 | 120.4 | 51.1 | 35.2 | 72.6 | 202.2 | |||||||||
| Production costs attributable to copper | 118.0 | 99.4 | 118.0 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Total production costs excluding molybdenum segment, as reported | 307.9 | 255.0 | 256.8 | 219.8 | 51.1 | 35.2 | 72.6 | 202.2 | |||||||||
| Adjust for: | |||||||||||||||||
| Third party smelting, refining and transport costs | 11.1 | 8.7 | 10.1 | 8.7 | 1.0 | — | 1.2 | 6.2 | |||||||||
| By-product and co-product credits | (238.0 | ) | (188.9 | ) | (238.0 | ) | (188.9 | ) | — | — | — | (7.3 | ) | ||||
| Community costs related to current operations | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.6 | 19.3 | |||||||||
| Adjusted production costs | 81.0 | 74.8 | 28.9 | 39.6 | 52.1 | 35.2 | 76.4 | 220.4 | |||||||||
| Corporate general administrative and other costs | 27.7 | 46.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Reclamation and remediation - accretion (operating sites) | 4.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 3.1 | — | 0.3 | 3.6 | |||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures | 85.5 | 51.2 | 66.7 | 37.8 | 18.8 | 13.4 | 60.6 | 200.5 | |||||||||
| Sustaining leases | 5.4 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 3.1 | — | — | |||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis | 204.5 | 181.6 | 103.2 | 85.0 | 74.6 | 51.7 | 137.3 | 424.5 | |||||||||
| Revenue-based taxes | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.0 | 138.5 | |||||||||
| Exploration and study costs | 23.6 | 23.3 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 8.8 | 15.9 | |||||||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures(1) | 5.3 | 53.0 | 4.1 | — | 0.8 | 30.4 | 25.9 | 16.8 | |||||||||
| Care and maintenance costs and pre-development costs | 14.1 | 24.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basis | 247.4 | 282.2 | 112.9 | 92.5 | 77.5 | 83.8 | 209.0 | 595.7 | |||||||||
| Ounces sold (000s) | 314.8 | 253.0 | 203.1 | 154.1 | 111.7 | 98.9 | 147.8 | 569.2 | |||||||||
| Pounds sold (millions) | 78.0 | 80.5 | 78.0 | 80.5 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Gold production costs ($/oz) | 604 | 615 | 683 | 781 | 457 | 356 | 491 | 355 | |||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs on a by-product basis ($/oz) | 649 | 718 | 508 | 552 | 668 | 523 | 929 | 746 | |||||||||
| All-in costs on a by-product basis ($/oz) | 785 | 1,116 | 556 | 600 | 694 | 848 | 1,414 | 1,047 | |||||||||
| Gold - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis ($/oz) | 891 | 954 | 883 | 939 | 668 | 523 | 929 | 746 | |||||||||
| Copper production costs ($/pound) | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.51 | 1.24 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
| Copper - All-in sustaining costs on a co-product basis ($/pound) | 1.94 | 1.48 | 1.94 | 1.48 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
| (1) | Non-sustaining capital expenditures are distinct projects designed to have a significant increase in the net present value of the mine. In the current year, non-sustaining capital expenditures include costs related primarily to the installation of the staged flotation reactors at the Mount Milligan Mine and the expansion of the Kumtor Mine while in prior year they related primarily to construction costs at the Öksüt Mine and the water treatment plant at the Kemess Project. | |
| (2) | Presented on a continuing operations basis, excluding the results from the Kumtor Mine. | |
| (3) | Results for the periods ended December 31, 2021 from the Kumtor Mine are prior to the seizure of the mine on May 15, 2021. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 46 |
Adjusted net earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure and can be reconciled as follows:
| Three months ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| ($millions, except as noted) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) | 274.9 | 95.2 | (381.8 | ) | 408.5 | |||||||||||
| Adjust for items not associated with ongoing operations: | ||||||||||||||||
| Loss of control of the Kumtor Mine | — | — | 926.4 | — | ||||||||||||
| Kumtor Mine legal costs, onerous contract and other related costs | 11.3 | — | 27.5 | — | ||||||||||||
| Gain from the discontinuance of Kumtor Mine hedge instruments | — | — | (15.3 | ) | — | |||||||||||
| Impairment reversal, net of tax | (117.3 | ) | — | (117.3 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Gain on the sale of Greenstone property | (25.0 | ) | — | (97.3 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Reclamation provision revaluation expense at sites on care and maintenance | 24.2 | 9.3 | 24.1 | 53.4 | ||||||||||||
| Income and mining tax adjustments(1) | (132.7 | ) | — | (132.7 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings | 35.4 | 104.5 | 233.6 | 461.9 | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share - basic | 0.93 | 0.32 | (1.29 | ) | 1.39 | |||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share - diluted | 0.92 | 0.32 | (1.29 | ) | 1.37 | |||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings per share - basic | 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.79 | 1.57 | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings per share - diluted | 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.77 | 1.55 | ||||||||||||

| (1) | Income and mining taxes adjustments reflect foreign currency translation recorded to the income and mining taxes (recovery) expense and the tax impact on impairment reversal. |
Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations is a non-GAAP financial measure and can be reconciled as follows:
| Three months ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||
| December 31 | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| ($millions, except as noted) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations | 274.9 | 31.6 | 446.9 | 16.1 | ||||||||||||
| Adjust for items not associated with ongoing operations: | ||||||||||||||||
| Kumtor Mine litigation and other related costs | 11.3 | — | 25.5 | — | ||||||||||||
| Impairment reversal, net of tax | (117.3 | ) | — | (117.3 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Gain on the sale of Greenstone property | (25.0 | ) | — | (97.3 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Reclamation provision revaluation expense at sites on care and maintenance | 24.2 | 9.3 | 24.1 | 53.4 | ||||||||||||
| Income and mining tax adjustments(1) | (132.7 | ) | — | (132.7 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations | 35.4 | 40.9 | 149.3 | 69.5 | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations per share - basic | 0.93 | 0.11 | 1.51 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations per share - diluted | 0.92 | 0.11 | 1.50 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations per share - basic | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.50 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations per share - diluted | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.50 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||

| (1) | Income and mining taxes adjustments reflect foreign currency translation recorded to the income and mining taxes (recovery) expense and the tax impact on impairment reversal. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 47 |
Free cash flow from continuing operations and adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations are non-GAAP financial measures and can be reconciled as follows:
| Three months ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | Mount Milligan | Öksüt | Molybdenum | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations(1) | 61.8 | 84.3 | 63.5 | 44.0 | 39.5 | 61.8 | (15.8 | ) | (3.8 | ) | (25.4 | ) | (17.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjust for: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant & equipment at continuing operations(1) | (23.1 | ) | (35.6 | ) | (17.3 | ) | (13.3 | ) | (4.2 | ) | (15.3 | ) | (1.4 | ) | (2.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Free cash flow (deficit) from continuing operations | 38.7 | 48.7 | 46.2 | 30.7 | 35.3 | 46.5 | (17.2 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (25.6 | ) | (22.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjust for: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kumtor Mine legal and other related costs | 5.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.3 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations | 44.0 | 48.7 | 46.2 | 30.7 | 35.3 | 46.5 | (17.2 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (20.3 | ) | (22.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | As presented in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. |
| Year ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | Mount Milligan | Öksüt | Molybdenum | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations(1) | 270.9 | 272.4 | 268.9 | 185.3 | 131.7 | 146.1 | (37.3 | ) | 11.4 | (92.4 | ) | (70.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjust for: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant & equipment at continuing operations(1) | (92.5 | ) | (103.5 | ) | (67.4 | ) | (35.1 | ) | (20.1 | ) | (40.9 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (21.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Free cash flow (deficit) from continuing operations | 178.4 | 168.9 | 201.5 | 150.2 | 111.6 | 105.2 | (39.8 | ) | 5.6 | (94.9 | ) | (92.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjust for: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kumtor Mine legal and other related costs | 14.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.2 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations | 192.6 | 168.9 | 201.5 | 150.2 | 111.6 | 105.2 | (39.8 | ) | 5.6 | (80.7 | ) | (92.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | As presented in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. |
Free cash flow from discontinued operations is a non-GAAP financial measure and can be reconciled as follows:
| Three months ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||
| December 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations(1) | — | 97.6 | 143.9 | 657.6 | ||||||||||||
| Adjust for: | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant & equipment from discontinued operations(1) | — | (72.5 | ) | (90.2 | ) | (222.7 | ) | |||||||||
| Free cash flow from discontinued operations | — | 25.1 | 53.7 | 434.9 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | As presented in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 48 |
Sustaining capital expenditures and non-sustaining capital expenditures are non-GAAP measures and can be reconciled as follows:
| Three months ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | Mount Milligan | Öksüt | Molybdenum | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to PP&E(1) | 46.9 | 65.8 | 28.9 | 16.0 | 9.3 | 38.4 | 1.4 | 3.0 | 7.3 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjust for: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs capitalized to the ARO assets | (17.8 | ) | (27.0 | ) | (5.3 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (21.9 | ) | — | — | (7.3 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs capitalized to the ROU assets | (1.3 | ) | — | (1.5 | ) | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other(2)(3) | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 0.0 | (1.2 | ) | — | (0.7 | ) | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | 28.1 | 40.4 | 22.4 | 16.6 | 4.3 | 15.3 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures | 25.7 | 28.0 | 20.2 | 16.6 | 4.1 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 0.1 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures | 2.4 | 12.4 | 2.2 | — | 0.2 | 6.2 | — | — | — | 6.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | As presented in the note 29 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. | |
| (2) | Includes reclassification of insurance and capital spares from supplies inventory to PP&E. | |
| (3) | 2020 figures at the Öksüt Mine include deferred financing costs related to the construction phase. |
| Year ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | Mount Milligan | Öksüt | Molybdenum | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to PP&E(1) | 118.9 | 140.7 | 83.7 | 38.1 | 24.9 | 69.3 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 7.8 | 26.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjust for: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs capitalized to the ARO assets | (17.8 | ) | (29.9 | ) | (5.3 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (23.1 | ) | — | — | (7.3 | ) | (3.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs capitalized to the ROU assets | (6.9 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (6.8 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | — | — | 0.0 | (0.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other(2)(3) | (0.9 | ) | 1.0 | (0.8 | ) | 3.6 | 0.0 | (2.3 | ) | — | (0.7 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 0.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | 93.3 | 110.7 | 70.8 | 37.8 | 19.6 | 43.8 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 23.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures | 88.0 | 57.0 | 66.7 | 37.8 | 18.8 | 13.4 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 0.4 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures | 5.3 | 53.7 | 4.1 | — | 0.8 | 30.4 | — | — | — | 23.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | As presented in the note 29 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. | |
| (2) | Includes reclassification of insurance and capital spares from supplies inventory to PP&E. | |
| (3) | 2020 figures at the Öksüt Mine include deferred financing costs related to the construction phase. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 49 |
Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources
The Company released the results of the updated mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates for the Mount Milligan Mine, the Öksüt Mine, and the Kemess Property as of December 31, 2021. The 2021 mineral reserves and resources estimate excludes the Greenstone project which was divested on January 19, 2021 as well the Kumtor Mine. The Kyrgyz Republic seized the Kumtor Mine on May 15, 2021 and the Company concluded that it had lost control of the Kumtor Mine. Therefore, the mineral reserves and mineral resources as at December 31, 2021 do not include the Kumtor Mine.
Mount Milligan’s mineral reserves and mineral resources are presented on a 100%-basis. Sales of gold and copper from the Mount Milligan Mine are subject to the Mount Milligan Streaming Arrangement whereby Royal Gold is entitled to 35% and 18.75% of gold and copper sales respectively. Under this streaming arrangement, Royal Gold pays Centerra $435 per ounce of gold delivered and 15% of the spot price per metric tonne of copper delivered.
Total gold mineral reserves and resources
| Gold (000s attributable ounces contained)(1)(4) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Total proven and probable mineral reserves | 4,849 | 11,166 | ||||||
| Total measured and indicated mineral resources(2) | 7,084 | 7,948 | ||||||
| Total inferred mineral resources(2)(3) | 1,032 | 5,379 | ||||||
| (1) | Centerra’s equity interests as at December 31, 2021, are as follows: Mount Milligan Mine 100%, Öksüt Mine 100% and Kemess Project 100%. The mineral reserves and mineral resources above reflect Centerra's equity interests in the applicable properties. | |
| (2) | Mineral resources are in addition to mineral reserves. Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. | |
| (3) | Inferred mineral resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined economically. It cannot be assumed that all or part of the inferred mineral resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. | |
| (4) | Production at the Mount Milligan Mine is subject to a streaming agreement which entitles Royal Gold to 35% of gold sales from the Mount Milligan Mine. Under the stream arrangement, Royal Gold will pay $435 per ounce of gold delivered. Mineral resources for the Mount Milligan property are presented on a 100%-basis. |
Total copper mineral reserves and resources
| Copper (millions of pounds contained)(1)(4) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Total proven and probable mineral reserves | 1,366 | 1,467 | ||||||
| Total measured and indicated mineral resources(2) | 5,783 | 5,329 | ||||||
| Total inferred mineral resources(2)(3) | 539 | 520 | ||||||
| (1) | Centerra’s equity interests as at December 31, 2021, are as follows: Mount Milligan Mine 100%, Kemess Project 100% and Berg property 100%. In December 2020, the Berg property was optioned to a third party which has the right to acquire a 70% interest in the property over a period of up to five years. | |
| (2) | Mineral resources are in addition to mineral reserves. Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. | |
| (3) | Inferred mineral resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined economically. It cannot be assumed that all or part of the inferred mineral resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. | |
| (4) | Production at the Mount Milligan Mine is subject to a streaming agreement which entitles Royal Gold to 18.75% of copper sales from the Mount Milligan mine. Under the stream arrangement, Royal Gold will pay 15% of the spot price per metric tonne of copper delivered. Mineral resources for the Mount Milligan property are presented on a 100% basis. |
Total molybdenum mineral reserves and resources
| Molybdenum (millions of pounds contained)(1)(3)(4) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Total proven and probable mineral reserves | — | — | ||||||
| Total measured and indicated mineral resources(2) | 636 | 636 | ||||||
| Total inferred mineral resources(3) | 50 | 50 | ||||||
| (1) | Centerra’s equity interests are Berg property 100%, Thompson Creek Mine 100%, and Endako Mine 75%. In December 2020, the Berg property was optioned to a third party which has the right to acquire a 70% interest in the property over a period of up to five years. | |
| (2) | Mineral resources are in addition to mineral reserves. Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. | |
| (3) | Inferred mineral resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined economically. It cannot be assumed that all or part of the inferred mineral resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 50 |
Material assumptions used to determine mineral reserves and mineral resources are as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Gold price | ||||||||
| Gold mineral reserves ($/oz) | 1,250-1,350 | 1,250-1,350 | ||||||
| Gold mineral resources ($/oz) | 1,450-1,550 | 1,500-1,550 | ||||||
| Copper price | ||||||||
| Copper mineral reserves ($/lb) | 3.00 | 3.00 | ||||||
| Copper mineral resources ($/lb) | 3.50 | 3.50 | ||||||
| Molybdenum price | ||||||||
| Molybdenum mineral resources ($/lb) | 14.00 | 14.00 | ||||||
| Foreign exchange rates | ||||||||
| 1 USD : Canadian dollar | 1.25-1.30 | 1.25 | ||||||
| 1 USD : Turkish lira | 7.50 | 5.50 | ||||||
Qualified Person & QA/QC – Production, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources
The production information and other scientific and technical information presented in this document, including the production estimates, were prepared in accordance with the standards of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum and NI 43-101 and were prepared, reviewed, verified, and compiled by Centerra’s geological and mining staff under the supervision of Slobodan (Bob) Jankovic, Professional Geoscientist, member of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (“APGO”) and Centerra’s Senior Director, Technical Services, who is a qualified person for the purpose of NI 43-101. Unless otherwise noted below, sample preparation, analytical techniques, laboratories used and quality assurance and quality control protocols used during the exploration drilling programs are done consistent with industry standards and independent certified assay labs are used.
The Kumtor deposit is described in a NI 43-101-compliant technical report dated February 24, 2021 (with an effective date of July 1, 2020) and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar. The technical report describes the exploration history, geology, and style of gold mineralization at the Kumtor deposit. Sample preparation, analytical techniques, laboratories used, and quality assurance and quality control protocols used are described in the technical report. While Centerra owns 100% of the Kumtor Mine, the mine is no longer under the Company’s control as a result of Kyrgyz Government actions that took place in May 2021 and which are disclosed above under “Recent Events and Developments – Kumtor Mine”.
The Mount Milligan deposit is described in a NI 43-101-compliant technical report dated March 26, 2020 and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar. The technical report describes the exploration history, geology, and style of gold mineralization at the Mount Milligan deposit. Sample preparation, analytical techniques, laboratories used, and quality assurance and quality control protocols used during the exploration drilling programs are done consistent with industry standards while independent certified assay labs are used.
The Öksüt deposit is described in a NI 43-101-compliant technical report dated September 3, 2015 and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. The technical report describes the exploration history, geology, and style of gold mineralization at the Öksüt deposit. Sample preparation, analytical techniques, laboratories used, and quality assurance and quality control protocols used during the exploration drilling programs are done consistent with industry standards while independent certified assay labs are used.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 51 |
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
52
Report of Management’s Accountability
The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements of Centerra Gold Inc. were prepared by management in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Management acknowledges responsibility for significant accounting judgments and audited annual consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.
The Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving the audited annual consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company and for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities. The Board of Directors carries out this responsibility principally through its Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors and all of its members are non-management directors. The Audit Committee reviews the consolidated financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis and the external auditors’ report; examines the fees and expenses for audit services; and considers the engagement or reappointment of the external auditors. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration when approving the consolidated financial statements for issuance to the shareholders. KPMG LLP, the external auditors, have full and free access to the Audit Committee.
| Original signed by: | Original signed by: | |
| Scott G. Perry | Darren J. Millman | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
February 24, 2022
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 53 |
![]() | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | KPMG LLP Bay Adelaide Centre 333 Bay Street, Suite 4600 Toronto, ON M5H 2S5 Canada Tel 416-777-8500 Fax 416-777-8818 |
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Centerra Gold Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of Centerra Gold Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2021, the related consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Loss of control of the Kumtor cash generating unit (CGU)
As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company concluded in the second quarter of 2021, that it had lost control of the Kumtor Mine because it cannot effectively exercise power over the relevant activities related to the mine and is no longer exposed to variable returns, nor can it affect the returns of the mine through its managerial involvement. As a result of the loss of control event, the Company deconsolidated the subsidiary, and derecognized the assets and liabilities of the Kumtor Mine at their carrying amounts at the date when control was lost. The Company deemed the loss of control a significant event and concluded that the Kumtor Mine should be treated as a discontinued operation. A loss on the change of control equal to the net carrying value of assets and liabilities of the Kumtor Mine at the date when control was lost, totaling $926.4 million, was recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income.
We identified the assessment of the loss of control and the presentation as a discontinued operation of the Kumtor CGU as a critical audit matter. A high degree of auditor judgment was required to evaluate the Company’s ability to effectively exercise power over the relevant activities related to the CGU, including to affect the economic returns of the CGU through its managerial involvement and be exposed to variable returns of the CGU. In addition, auditor judgment was required to assess whether the loss of control of the CGU was a disposal.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 54 |
![]() |
KPMG
LLP Bay Adelaide Centre 333 Bay Street, Suite 4600 Toronto, ON M5H 2S5 Canada |
Tel 416-777-8500 Fax 416-777-8818 |
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of an internal control over the Company’s process to assess the loss of control of the CGU. This included an assessment of whether the Company was able to effectively exercise power over the relevant activities, affect the economic returns, be exposed to variable returns of the CGU and whether the loss of control was a disposal. We analyzed the Company’s loss of control and discontinued operations assessment by comparing the facts and circumstances to publicly disclosed information including the temporary management law passed by the Kyrgyz Republic. We evaluated the Company’s disclosure by comparing to the requirements related to loss of control and presentation as discontinued operations.
Recoverable amount of the Mount Milligan CGU
As discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, in the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company identified improved and reliable performance, increased expectation of resource conversion and increased long-term gold and copper prices to be an indicator to test the Mount Milligan Mine for impairment reversal. The estimated recoverable amount of the Mount Milligan mine CGU as at December 31, 2021 was determined on the basis of fair value less costs of disposal (“FVLCD”) and calculated by discounting the estimated future net cash flows over the estimated life of the mine. Calculating the FVLCD required management to make estimates and assumptions with respect to future production levels and operating and capital costs in the life of mine plans, future metal prices, foreign exchange rates, discount rates and estimates of the fair value attributable to mineralization in excess of life of mine plans. As the Mount Milligan Mine CGU’s estimated recoverable amount exceeded the previous carrying amount less amortization that would have been recognized had the assets not been impaired, an impairment reversal of $160.0 million ($117.3 million, net of tax) was recognized in the impairment reversal line item in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings.
We identified the assessment of the recoverable amount of property, plant and equipment of the Mount Milligan CGU as a critical audit matter. A high degree of auditor judgment was required to evaluate the estimated future cash flows used to estimate the recoverable amount. Significant assumptions were the production levels, operating and capital costs, future metal prices, foreign exchange rates, the discount rate and fair value attributable to mineralization in excess of life of mine plans. Changes in any of these assumptions or estimates used in determining the fair values could have impacted the impairment reversal analysis and its conclusions. In addition, auditor judgment was required to assess the mineral reserves and resources which form the basis of the life of mine plan and the fair value attributable to mineralization in excess of life of mine plans.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of certain internal controls over the Company’s process to determine recoverable amount of the Mount Milligan CGU. This included controls over the determination of future cash flows in the life-of-mine models used to estimate the recoverable amount of the CGU and the development of the significant assumptions. We assessed the estimates of the future production levels and operating and capital cost assumptions used in the life of mine plans by comparing them to historical results. We evaluated the Company’s estimate of mineral reserves and resources by comparing the Company’s historical estimates to actual production results. We assessed the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the Company’s personnel who prepared the mineral reserve and resource estimates, including the industry and regulatory standards they applied. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
| • | evaluating the future metal prices and foreign exchange rates by comparing to third party estimates |
| • | evaluating the discount rate assumption by comparing to an estimate that was independently developed using publicly available third party sources and data for comparable entities |
| • | assessing the fair value attributable to mineralization in excess of life of mine plans, by comparing the assumption to the implied value per ounce of the mineral reserves and resources in the discounted cash flow model. |

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2004
Toronto,
Canada
February 24, 2022
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 55 |
![]() | INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT | KPMG LLP Bay Adelaide Centre 333 Bay Street, Suite 4600 Toronto, ON M5H 2S5 Canada Tel 416-777-8500 Fax 416-777-8818 |
To the Shareholders of Centerra Gold Inc.
Opinion
We have audited the comparative information in the consolidated accompanying financial statements of Centerra Gold Inc. (the Entity), which comprise:
| • | the consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31, 2020 |
| • | the consolidated statement of earnings (loss) and other comprehensive (loss) income for the year ended December 31, 2020 |
| • | the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2020 |
| • | the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 |
| • | and notes to the consolidated comparative information, including a summary of significant accounting policies. |
(Hereinafter referred to as the “comparative information”).
In our opinion, the comparative information in the accompanying financial statements presents fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Entity as at December 31, 2020, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Comparative Information” section of our auditors’ report.
We are independent of the Entity in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the comparative information in Canada and we have fulfilled our other responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Comparative Information
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the comparative information in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of comparative information that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the comparative information, management is responsible for assessing the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Entity or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Entity‘s financial reporting process.
Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Comparative Information
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the comparative information as a whole is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the comparative information.
As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 56 |
![]() | KPMG
LLP Bay Adelaide Centre 333 Bay Street, Suite 4600 Toronto, ON M5H 2S5 Canada Tel 416-777-8500 Fax 416-777-8818 |
We also:
| • | Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the comparative information, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. |
The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
| • | Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Entity's internal control. |
| • | Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management. |
| • | Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditors’ report to the related disclosures in the comparative information or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditors’ report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Entity to cease to continue as a going concern. |
| • | Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the comparative information, including the disclosures, and whether the comparative information represents the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. |
| • | Communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. |
| • | Provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards. |
| • | Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group Entity to express an opinion on the comparative information. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion. |

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this auditor's report is Daniel Gordon Ricica.
Toronto, Canada
February 24, 2022
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 57 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
| As at December 31, | Notes | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||
| (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars) | ||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||
| Current assets | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 947,230 | $ | 545,180 | ||||||||
| Amounts receivable | 8 | 76,841 | 66,108 | |||||||||
| Inventories | 9 | 221,220 | 580,587 | |||||||||
| Assets held-for-sale | 7 | — | 140,005 | |||||||||
| Other current assets | 10 | 25,802 | 40,961 | |||||||||
| 1,271,093 | 1,372,841 | |||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 11 | 1,272,091 | 1,686,067 | |||||||||
| Deferred income tax assets | 22 | 101,300 | — | |||||||||
| Other non-current assets | 12 | 32,084 | 77,101 | |||||||||
| 1,405,475 | 1,763,168 | |||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 2,676,568 | $ | 3,136,009 | ||||||||
| Liabilities and shareholders' equity | ||||||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 13 | $ | 186,820 | $ | 232,704 | |||||||
| Income tax payable | 22 | 25,253 | 2,474 | |||||||||
| Liabilities held-for-sale | 7 | — | 2,255 | |||||||||
| Other current liabilities | 10 | 15,281 | 20,395 | |||||||||
| 227,354 | 257,828 | |||||||||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 22 | 54,861 | 39,473 | |||||||||
| Provision for reclamation | 15 | 331,312 | 351,149 | |||||||||
| Other non-current liabilities | 12 | 19,425 | 21,541 | |||||||||
| 405,598 | 412,163 | |||||||||||
| Shareholders' equity | ||||||||||||
| Share capital | 23 | 984,095 | 975,122 | |||||||||
| Contributed surplus | 30,809 | 30,601 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | 6,829 | 11,600 | ||||||||||
| Retained earnings | 1,021,883 | 1,448,695 | ||||||||||
| 2,043,616 | 2,466,018 | |||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 2,676,568 | $ | 3,136,009 | ||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (note 25) Subsequent events (note 30) | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Approved by the Board of Directors
Original signed by:
| Michael S. Parrett | Richard W. Connor |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 58 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Earnings and Comprehensive (Loss) Income
| For the years ended December 31, | Notes | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||
| (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars) (except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
| Revenue | 17 | $ | 900,141 | $ | 721,262 | |||||||
| Cost of sales | ||||||||||||
| Production costs | 487,676 | 409,967 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 120,505 | 95,810 | ||||||||||
| Earnings from mine operations | 291,960 | 215,485 | ||||||||||
| Exploration and development costs | 26,082 | 31,537 | ||||||||||
| Corporate administration | 18 | 27,134 | 45,674 | |||||||||
| Care and maintenance expense | 28,723 | 29,117 | ||||||||||
| Impairment reversal | 6 | (160,000 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Reclamation expense | 15 | 23,347 | 53,381 | |||||||||
| Other operating expenses | 19 | 12,759 | 11,862 | |||||||||
| Earnings from operations | 333,915 | 43,914 | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of Greenstone Partnership | 7 | (97,274 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Other non-operating expenses | 20 | 23,493 | 6,247 | |||||||||
| Finance costs | 21 | 4,762 | 13,818 | |||||||||
| Earnings before income tax | 402,934 | 23,849 | ||||||||||
| Income tax (recovery) expense | 22 | (44,015 | ) | 7,709 | ||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations | 446,949 | 16,140 | ||||||||||
| Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations | 5 | (828,717 | ) | 392,398 | ||||||||
| Net (loss) earnings | $ | (381,768 | ) | $ | 408,538 | |||||||
| Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income | ||||||||||||
| Items that may be subsequently reclassified to earnings: | ||||||||||||
| Net gain on translation of foreign operation | $ | 31 | $ | 839 | ||||||||
| Net (loss) gain on derivative instruments | 27 | (4,802 | ) | 11,513 | ||||||||
| Other comprehensive (loss) income | (4,771 | ) | 12,352 | |||||||||
| Total comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (386,539 | ) | $ | 420,890 | |||||||
| Earnings per share - continuing operations: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | 23 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 0.05 | |||||||
| Diluted | 23 | $ | 1.48 | $ | 0.05 | |||||||
| (Loss) earnings per share: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | 23 | $ | (1.29 | ) | $ | 1.39 | ||||||
| Diluted | 23 | $ | (1.29 | ) | $ | 1.37 | ||||||
| Cash dividends declared per common share (C$) | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 59 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| For the years ended December 31, | Notes | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||
| (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars) | ||||||||||||
| Operating activities | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations | $ | 446,949 | $ | 16,140 | ||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 126,374 | 102,046 | ||||||||||
| Reclamation expense | 15 | 23,347 | 53,581 | |||||||||
| Share-based compensation expense | 1,364 | 20,348 | ||||||||||
| Finance costs | 21 | 4,762 | 13,818 | |||||||||
| Inventory impairment | 377 | 13,588 | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of Greenstone Partnership | 7 | (97,274 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Income tax (recovery) expense | 22 | (44,015 | ) | 7,709 | ||||||||
| Income taxes (paid) refunded | (17,182 | ) | 18,490 | |||||||||
| Impairment reversal | 6 | (160,000 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Other | (1,023 | ) | 4,082 | |||||||||
| 283,679 | 249,802 | |||||||||||
| Changes in working capital | 24 | (12,771 | ) | 22,588 | ||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations | 270,908 | 272,390 | ||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations | 143,853 | 657,625 | ||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities | 414,761 | 930,015 | ||||||||||
| Investing activities | ||||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment additions | (92,500 | ) | (103,563 | ) | ||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of Greenstone Partnership | 7 | 210,291 | — | |||||||||
| Proceeds from disposition of marketable securities | — | 4,372 | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from disposition of fixed assets | 11 | 11,868 | — | |||||||||
| Decrease in restricted cash | 2,660 | 25,246 | ||||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in other assets | 188 | (690 | ) | |||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in) investing activities from continuing operations | 132,507 | (74,635 | ) | |||||||||
| Cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations | (96,081 | ) | (228,741 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 36,426 | (303,376 | ) | |||||||||
| Financing activities | ||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | 23 | (45,044 | ) | (39,757 | ) | |||||||
| Debt drawdown | — | 250,000 | ||||||||||
| Debt repayment | — | (327,472 | ) | |||||||||
| Payment of borrowing costs | (2,654 | ) | (8,515 | ) | ||||||||
| Repayment of lease obligations | 24 | (6,476 | ) | (6,037 | ) | |||||||
| Proceeds from common shares issued | 5,037 | 7,793 | ||||||||||
| Cash used in financing activities | (49,137 | ) | (123,988 | ) | ||||||||
| Increase in cash during the period | 402,050 | 502,651 | ||||||||||
| Cash at beginning of the period | 545,180 | 42,717 | ||||||||||
| Reclassified to assets held-for-sale | 7 | — | (188 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash at end of the period | $ | 947,230 | $ | 545,180 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 60 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share information)
| Number of Common Shares | Share Capital Amount | Contributed Surplus | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Retained Earnings | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2021 | 295,827,906 | $ | 975,122 | $ | 30,601 | $ | 11,600 | $ | 1,448,695 | $ | 2,466,018 | |||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (381,768 | ) | (381,768 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive loss | — | — | — | (4,771 | ) | — | (4,771 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Transactions with shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation expense | — | — | 3,590 | — | — | 3,590 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Issued on exercise of stock options | 756,056 | 5,492 | (1,458 | ) | — | — | 4,034 | |||||||||||||||||
| Issued under the employee share purchase plan | 137,023 | 1,175 | — | — | — | 1,175 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Issued on redemption of restricted share units | 343,765 | 2,306 | (1,924 | ) | — | — | 382 | |||||||||||||||||
| Dividend declared (C$0.24 per share) | — | — | — | — | (45,044 | ) | (45,044 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | 297,064,750 | $ | 984,095 | $ | 30,809 | $ | 6,829 | $ | 1,021,883 | $ | 2,043,616 | |||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2020 | 293,690,456 | $ | 960,404 | $ | 26,278 | $ | (752 | ) | $ | 1,079,914 | $ | 2,065,844 | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings | — | — | — | — | 408,538 | 408,538 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | 12,352 | — | 12,352 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Transactions with owners: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation expense | — | — | 10,564 | — | — | 10,564 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Issued on exercise of stock options | 1,490,465 | 10,641 | (3,291 | ) | — | — | 7,350 | |||||||||||||||||
| Issued under the employee share purchase plan | 520,165 | 1,096 | — | — | — | 1,096 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Issued on redemption of restricted share units | 126,820 | 2,981 | (2,950 | ) | — | — | 31 | |||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared (C$0.18 per share) | — | — | — | — | (39,757 | ) | (39,757 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | 295,827,906 | $ | 975,122 | $ | 30,601 | $ | 11,600 | $ | 1,448,695 | $ | 2,466,018 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 61 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| 1. | Nature of operations |
Centerra Gold Inc. (“Centerra” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act on November 7, 2002. Centerra’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “CG” and on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CGAU”. The Company is domiciled in Canada and its registered office is located at 1 University Avenue, Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2P1. The Company is primarily focused on operating, developing, exploring and acquiring gold and copper properties in North America, Turkey, and other markets worldwide.
| 2. | Basis of presentation |
| a. | Statement of Compliance |
The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). These financial statements were authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) on February 24, 2022.
| b. | Basis of Presentation |
Overview
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost basis, except for certain financial assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value. The consolidated financial statements are presented in US dollars with all amounts rounded to the nearest thousand, except where otherwise noted.
Subsidiaries
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany balances, transactions, income and expenses and gains or losses have been eliminated on consolidation. Subsidiaries consist of entities from which the Company is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns as well as the ability to affect those returns through the power to direct the relevant activities of the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date control is transferred to the Company and are de-consolidated from the date control ceases. The Company reassesses whether or not it controls a subsidiary if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the elements of control. If the Company loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognizes the related assets, liabilities, non-controlling interest and other components of equity, while any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the statements of (loss) earnings. Any investment retained is recognized at fair value.
Joint Arrangements
A joint arrangement is defined as an arrangement in which two or more parties have joint control. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control over an arrangement between two or more parties. This exists only when the decisions about the relevant activities that significantly affect the returns of the arrangement require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
A joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties have joint control of the arrangement and have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities relating to the arrangement. These consolidated financial statements include the Company’s interests in the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the joint operations, from the date that joint control commenced. The Company’s 75% interest in the Endako Mine has been accounted for as a joint operation. The Company’s 50% interest in the Greenstone Gold Mines Partnership (“Greenstone Partnership”) has been accounted for as joint operation up to the date of its sale on January 19, 2021.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 62 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| 3. | Summary of significant accounting policies |
The significant accounting policies summarized below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.
| a. | Business combinations |
The Company uses the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations, whereby the purchase consideration transferred in the acquisition is allocated to the identifiable net assets acquired on the basis of fair value. Certain fair values may be estimated at the acquisition date pending confirmation or completion of the valuation process, within a measurement period not to exceed one year from the acquisition date.
Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at fair value at the acquisition date. The excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. A gain is recorded through the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income if the cost of the acquisition is less than the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired.
| b. | Non-current assets and disposal groups held-for-sale |
Non-current assets or disposal groups are classified as assets held-for-sale (“HFS”) if it is highly probable that they will be sold in their current condition within one year from the date of classification. Assets and disposal groups that meet the criteria to be classified as HFS are recorded at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less cost of disposal. Impairment losses on initial classification as HFS and subsequent gains and losses on remeasurement are recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income. Once classified as HFS, property, plant and equipment are no longer depreciated. The assets and disposal groups classified as HFS are presented separately in the consolidated statements of financial position.
| c. | Discontinued operations |
A disposal group qualifies as a discontinued operation if it is a component of the Company that either has been disposed of, or is classified as held for sale, and: (i) represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations; (ii) is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations; or (iii) is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale. A component of the Company comprises an operation and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the Company. Discontinued operations are excluded from the results of continuing operations and are presented as a single amount as earnings or loss after tax from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income.
| d. | Foreign currency |
The functional currency of the Company, including its subsidiaries and joint operations is the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. The functional currency of the Company’s operations is the United States dollar (“USD”), except for the Greenstone Partnership, which had a functional currency of the Canadian dollar (“CAD”). Greenstone Partnership was disposed in the first quarter of 2021 (note 7). Any translation gains (losses) associated with Greenstone Partnership were recorded as part of other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 63 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Once the Company determines the functional currency of an entity, it is not changed unless there is a significant change in the relevant underlying transactions, events and circumstances. Any change in a Company’s functional currency is accounted for prospectively from the date of the change, and the consolidated balance sheets are translated using the exchange rate at that date.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the Company’s functional currency as follows:
| • | Non-monetary items that are measured at historical cost are translated at the historical exchange rates prevailing at each transaction date. Non-monetary items that are measured at fair value are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date the fair value was measured. | |
| • | Monetary items are translated at the closing rate in effect at the statement of financial position date. | |
| • | Revenue and expense items are translated using the average exchange rate during the period. |
| e. | Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and short-term investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Cash and cash equivalents are classified as financial assets carried at amortized cost.
| f. | Restricted cash and restricted short-term investments |
Cash and short-term investments which are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on their use are classified separately as restricted cash and restricted short-term investments.
| g. | Inventories |
Metal inventories, including heap leach ore, stockpiled ore, in-circuit gold, gold and copper concentrate, gold doré and molybdenum inventory are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value (“NRV”).
The cost of inventories is determined primarily on a weighted-average basis and includes all costs of purchase, costs of conversion and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Costs of inventories include direct materials, direct labour, transportation, shipping, freight and insurance costs, mine-site overhead expenses and depreciation, depletion and amortization of mining assets. Molybdenum inventory additionally includes amounts paid for molybdenum concentrate purchased from third parties, as well as costs associated with beneficiation and roasting.
NRV is calculated as the estimated price in the ordinary course of business, less costs to be incurred in converting the relevant inventories to saleable product and delivering it to a customer. Any write-down of inventories to NRV or reversals of previous write-downs are recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income in the period that the write-down or reversal occurs.
Supplies inventory and spare parts are valued at weighted average cost. Provisions are recorded to reduce supplies inventory to NRV, which is generally calculated by reference to its salvage or scrap value, when it is determined that the supplies are obsolete.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 64 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| h. | Property, plant and equipment |
Buildings, plant and equipment
Buildings, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, including all expenditures incurred to prepare an asset for its intended use. An item of buildings, plant and equipment is de-recognized upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on de-recognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between any proceeds received and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income in the year the asset is de-recognized.
Buildings, plant and equipment are depreciated according to either the units-of-production method or on a straight- line basis over their expected useful life, according to the pattern in which the asset’s future economic benefits are expected to be consumed. Depreciation commences when the assets are considered available for use. Once buildings, plant and equipment are considered available for use, they are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and applicable impairment losses.
Where an item of building, plant and equipment comprises major components with different useful lives, the components are depreciated separately but are grouped for disclosure purposes as building, plant and equipment. Major overhaul expenditures and the cost of replacement of a major component are depreciated over the average expected period between major overhauls.
Management annually reviews the estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation methods of the Company’s building, plant and equipment and also when events and circumstances indicate that such a review should be undertaken. Changes to estimated useful lives, residual values or depreciation methods resulting from such reviews are accounted for prospectively.
The following table sets out the useful lives of certain assets depreciated using the straight-line basis:
| Useful Life | ||
| Buildings, plant and equipment | 2 to 20 years | |
| Mobile equipment | 2 to 10 years | |
| Light vehicles and other mobile equipment | 2 to 10 years | |
| Furniture, computer and office equipment | 2 to 5 years |
Construction-in-progress
Assets under construction are capitalized as construction-in-progress until the asset is available for use. The cost of construction-in-progress comprises its purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing it into working condition for its intended use. Directly attributable costs are capitalized until the asset is in a location and condition necessary for operation as intended by management. These costs include: the purchase price, installation costs, site preparation costs, survey costs, freight charges, transportation insurance costs, duties, testing and preparation charges and estimated costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located.
Costs incurred on properties in the development stage are included in the carrying amount of the development project in construction-in-progress. A property is classified as a development property when a mine plan has been prepared and a decision is made to commercially develop the property. Development stage expenditures are costs incurred to obtain access to proven and probable mineral reserves or mineral resources and provide facilities for extracting, treating, gathering, transporting, and storing the minerals. All expenditures incurred from the time the development decision is made until when the asset is ready for its intended use are capitalized. Proceeds from mineral sales are offset against costs capitalized prior to a mine being capable of operating at levels intended by management and is not included in revenue from mining operations.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 65 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Borrowing costs are capitalized to qualifying assets and are included in construction-in-progress. Qualifying assets are assets that take a substantial period of time to prepare for the Company’s intended use, which includes projects that are in the exploration and evaluation, pre-development and development stages. Borrowing costs attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets are added to the cost of those assets until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use. All other borrowing costs are expensed as finance costs in the period in which they are incurred. Where the funds used to finance a qualifying asset form part of a general borrowing, the amount capitalized is calculated using a weighted average of rates applicable to the relevant borrowings during the period.
Construction-in-progress is not depreciated. When an asset becomes available for use, its costs are transferred from construction-in-progress into the appropriate asset classification such as mineral properties, building, plant and equipment. Depreciation commences once the asset is complete and available for use.
Mineral properties
The cost of mineral properties includes the fair value attributable to proven and probable mineral reserves and mineral resources acquired, development costs, capitalized exploration and evaluation costs and capitalized borrowing costs. These costs incurred are directly attributable to bringing a mineral property to the state where it is capable of operating in the manner intended by management (“commercial production”). In determining whether a mine has achieved commercial production, the criteria considered include the following:
| • | Substantial completion of the construction activities; | |
| • | Ability to produce minerals in saleable form (within specifications); | |
| • | Completion of a reasonable period of testing of mine plant and equipment; and | |
| • | Ability to sustain ongoing production of minerals. |
After a mineral property has been brought into commercial production, costs are expensed as incurred or capitalized to inventory. Once in commercial production, sales are recognized as revenues and production costs as a component of cost of sales, instead of being deducted from or added to the capitalized construction cost of the mine and amortization of capitalized costs in property, plant and equipment commences.
Mineral properties are depreciated on a units-of-production basis over the estimated economic life of the mine to which they relate.
Deferred stripping costs
In open pit mining operations, it is necessary to remove overburden and other waste materials to access ore from which minerals can be extracted economically. The process of mining overburden and waste materials to access ore from which minerals can be extracted economically is referred to as stripping. Stripping costs incurred in the production phase are accounted for as costs of the inventory produced during the period that the stripping costs are incurred, unless these costs are expected to provide a future economic benefit to an identifiable component of the ore body which will be extracted in the future. Components of the ore body are based on the distinct development phases identified by the mine planning engineers when determining the optimal development plan for the open pit.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 66 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Stripping costs incurred in the production phase provide a future economic benefit when:
| • | It is probable that the future economic benefit associated with the stripping activity will flow to the Company; | |
| • | The Company can identify the component of the ore body for which access has been improved; and | |
| • | The costs relating to the stripping activity associated with that component can be measured reliably by the Company. |
Where a mine operates several open pits that are regarded as separate operations for the purpose of mine planning, stripping costs are accounted for separately by reference to the ore from each separate pit. A “component” is a specific section of the ore body that is made more accessible by the stripping activity and is typically a subset of the larger ore body that is distinguished by a separate useful economic life.
When the costs of the stripping activity asset and the inventory produced are not separately identifiable, the Company allocates the production stripping costs between the inventory produced and the stripping activity asset by using an allocation basis that is based on a relevant production measure. This production measure is calculated for the identified component of the ore body and is used as a benchmark to identify the extent to which the additional activity of creating a future benefit has taken place. The benchmark used divides the total tonnage mined (ore and waste) for the component or pit for the period by the quantity of minerals contained in the ore mined for the component or pit.
Capitalized stripping costs are depleted on a units-of-production basis over the proven and probable reserves that become more accessible as a result of the stripping activity.
| h. | Leases |
At inception of a contract, the Company assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease by assessing if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The Company uses the following criteria to assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset:
| • | The contract involves the use of an explicitly or implicitly identified lease; | |
| • | The Company has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset throughout the period of use; and, | |
| • | The Company has the right to direct the use of the asset. |
If a contract is assessed to contain a lease, a lease liability and right-of-use (“ROU”) asset is recognized at the commencement date of the lease (i.e. the date the underlying asset is available for use).
ROU assets are measured at cost less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses and adjusted for any remeasurements of the lease liability. Such costs include the initial amount of lease obligations recognized, initial direct costs incurred, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received.
Unless the Company is reasonably certain to obtain ownership of the leased asset at the end of the lease term, the ROU assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life and the lease term. ROU assets are subject to impairment.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 67 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
At the commencement date, the lease liability is measured at the present value of lease payments to settle the lease contract, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease agreement or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Generally, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate. The lease payments include fixed payments, variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, amounts expected to be paid under residual value guarantees and the exercise price of a purchase option reasonably certain to be exercised by the Company.
After the commencement date, the lease liability is increased by the interest cost on the lease liability and decreased by lease payments made. It is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change in the fixed lease payments, changes based on an index or rate or a change in the assessment to purchase the underlying asset.
| i. | Impairment and impairment reversal of long-lived assets |
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment indicators at each reporting period. If an indicator of impairment exists, the Company calculates the recoverable amount of the asset to determine if any impairment loss is required. The recoverable amount is determined for an individual asset unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are independent of those generated from other assets or groups of assets, in which case, the individual assets are grouped together into cash generating units (“CGUs”) for impairment testing purposes. The recoverable amount is the greater of value-in-use (“VIU”) and fair value less costs of disposal (“FVLCD”) of an asset or CGU. An impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the CGU over its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recorded in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings in the period in which they occur.
The Company applies the impairment loss to the CGU’s long-lived assets based on their carrying amounts on a pro- rata basis. Assumptions, such as gold price, copper price, molybdenum price, exchange rates, discount rate, and expenditures underlying the estimate of recoverable value are subject to risks and uncertainties.
CGUs with previous impairment charges to long-lived assets, other than goodwill, are monitored for potential indicators of impairment reversal each reporting period. Any impairment charge that is taken on a long-lived asset, other than goodwill, is reversed if there are subsequent changes in the estimates or significant assumptions that were used to recognize the impairment loss, that result in an increase in the recoverable amount of the CGU. If an indicator of impairment reversal has been identified, the recoverable amount of the long-lived asset is calculated in order to determine if any impairment reversal is required. This reversal is recognized in earnings and is limited to the carrying value that would have been determined, net of any depreciation, depletion and amortization, where applicable, had no impairment charge been recognized previously. Impairment reversals are recorded in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings in the period in which they occur.
| j. | Provision for reclamation |
Provisions for reclamation arise from the acquisition, development and construction of mining properties and plant and equipment that are subject to government controls and regulations that protect the environment on the closure and reclamation of mining properties. Provisions for reclamation are recognized at the time that an environmental disturbance occurs or a new legal or constructive obligation is determined. The major parts of the carrying amount of provisions relate to tailings facilities and heap leach pad closure and rehabilitation, demolition of buildings and mine facilities, ongoing water treatment and ongoing care and maintenance of closed mines. Costs included in the provision encompass all closure and rehabilitation activity expected to occur progressively over the life of the operation at the time of closure and post-closure in connection with disturbances as at the reporting date. Estimated costs included in the determination of the provision reflect the risks and probabilities of alternative estimates of cash flows required to settle the obligation at each particular operation. Provisions for reclamation are measured at the expected value of future cash flows discounted to their present value using a pre-tax risk-free discount rate.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 68 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Each reporting period, provisions for reclamation are remeasured to reflect any changes to significant assumptions, including changes in discount rates, foreign exchange rates and the timing or amounts of the costs to be incurred. For operating sites, when the provision for reclamation is recognized or adjusted for an operating asset, the corresponding cost is capitalized to the related item of property, plant and equipment, except where a reduction in the obligation is greater than the amount capitalized, in which case the capitalized costs are reduced to nil and the remaining adjustment is included in the Statements of Earnings. Reclamation provisions that result from disturbance in the land to extract ore in the current period are included in the cost of inventories. When the provision for reclamation is recognized or adjusted for closed sites, the cost is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income.
The provisions are adjusted each period to reflect the passage of time and are recorded in finance costs in the period incurred. Upon settlement of the provision for reclamation, the Company records a gain or loss if the actual cost differs from the carrying amount of the provision. Settlement gains or losses are recorded in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income.
| k. | Contingent liabilities and other provisions |
Provisions are recorded when a legal or constructive obligation exists as a result of past events where it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made. The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the amount required to settle the present obligation estimated at the end of each reporting period, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. A provision is measured using the present value of cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, discounted using a pre-tax risk-free discount rate consistent with the time period of expected cash flows. The increase in provision due to the passage of time is recognized as a finance cost in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income.
Contingent liabilities may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. In assessing loss contingencies, the Company, with assistance from its legal counsel, evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought.
If the assessment of a contingency suggests that a loss is probable, and the amount can be reliably estimated, then a provision is recorded. When a contingent loss is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable but the amount of loss cannot be reliably estimated, then details of the contingent loss are disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed. Legal fees incurred in connection with pending legal proceedings are expensed as incurred.
| l. | Debt |
Debt is initially recognized at fair value, net of financing costs incurred. Debt is subsequently measured at amortized cost. Any difference between the amounts received and the redemption value of the debt is recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings over the period to maturity using the effective interest method.
| m. | Share-based compensation |
Employee Stock Option Plan
Stock options are equity-settled share-based compensation awards. The fair value of stock options at the grant date is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation expense is recognized over the stock option vesting period based on the number of units estimated to vest. This expense is recognized as share-based compensation expense with a corresponding increase in contributed surplus. When options are exercised, the proceeds received by the Company, together with the amount in contributed surplus, are credited to common shares.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 69 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Performance Share Unit Plan
Under Centerra’s Performance Share Unit (“PSU”) Plan, PSUs can be granted to employees and officers of the Company. A PSU represents the right to receive the cash equivalent of a common share or, at the Company’s option, a common share purchased on the open market. PSUs are accounted for under the liability method using the Monte Carlo simulation option pricing model and vest over three years whereby 50% vest on December 31 of the year following the grant year (“end of year 2”) and the remaining 50% vest on December 31 of the subsequent year (“end of year 3”). Under this method, the fair value of the PSUs is recognized over the vesting period. The liability is adjusted to fair value at each reporting period and any resulting adjustment to the accrued obligation is recognized as an expense or, if negative, a recovery. The cash paid on exercise of these PSUs is recorded as a reduction of the accrued obligation. The number of units that vest is determined by multiplying the number of units granted to the participant by the adjustment factor based on Centerra’s total return performance relative to the total return index value (“TRIV”) from the S&P/TSX Global Gold CAD$ Index during the applicable period.
Deferred Share Unit Plan
Centerra has a Deferred Share Unit (“DSU”) Plan for directors of the Company to receive all or a portion of their annual compensation as deferred share units. DSUs are settled in cash and are accounted for under the liability method. The DSUs cannot be converted to shares by the unit holder or by the Company. The DSUs vest immediately upon granting and can be redeemed only after a director no longer holds any position with the Company, but no later than December 15 of the following year in which the director ceased to hold all positions in the Company. A liability is recorded at grant date equal to the fair value of the DSUs. The liability is adjusted to fair value at each reporting period and any resulting adjustment to the accrued obligation is recognized as an expense or, if negative, a recovery. The cash paid on exercise of these deferred share units is recorded as a reduction of the accrued obligation.
Restricted Share Unit Plan
There are three types of Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”): the Executive RSUs, the Director RSUs, and the Discretionary RSUs.
Executive RSUs are equity-settled share-based compensation awards. Effective in 2017, prior to the end of the first quarter of any fiscal year (or for US persons, prior to the commencement of the fiscal year), Executive RSU holders may elect to receive a portion of their annual incentive payments for that year as Executive RSUs. The Company will match 50% of the Executive RSUs granted to Executive RSU holders. Executive RSUs vest 50% as of the first anniversary of their grant dates and the remaining 50% vest as of the second anniversary of their grant dates. The fair value of the Executive RSUs at the grant date is the portion of the annual incentive payment elected by these employees to be received as RSUs, plus the 50% of the RSUs granted to such individuals that is matched by the Company. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period based on the number of units to vest. The expense is recognized as share-based compensation expense with a corresponding increase in contributed surplus. When the Executive RSUs are exercised (at the executive’s election any time following the vesting period), the proceeds received by the Company are reclassified from contributed surplus to common shares.
The Director RSUs can be settled in cash or equity at the option of the holders. The Director RSUs vest immediately upon grant and are redeemed on a date chosen by the participant (subject to certain restrictions as set out in the plan). The Director RSUs granted are accounted for under the liability method whereby a liability is recorded at grant date equal to the fair value of the Director RSU.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 70 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The Discretionary RSUs can be settled in cash or equity at the option of the holders and are granted by the Board of Directors to certain employees of the Company. Discretionary RSUs vest 25% as of the second anniversary of their grant dates, and 75% as of the third anniversary of their grant dates. The Discretionary RSUs are accounted for under the liability method whereby a liability is recorded at grant date equal to the fair value of the Discretionary RSU. Under this method, the fair value of the Discretionary RSUs are recognized over the vesting period. The liability is adjusted to fair value at each reporting period and any resulting adjustment to the accrued obligation is recognized as an expense or, if negative, a recovery.
Employee Share Purchase Plan
Centerra has an Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) for employees of the Company. Under the ESPP, employees may elect to purchase the Company’s shares through a payroll deduction. Each year, employees may elect to contribute up to 10% of their base salary and the Company will match 25% of the contribution. Such contributions are then used to acquire Centerra shares on a quarterly basis. Shares purchased have no vesting requirement and may be issued from treasury or acquired on the open market. The Company records an expense equal to value of the match provided.
Dividends
When dividends are paid, participants under the PSU, DSU and RSU plans are allocated additional units equal in value to the dividend paid per common share based on the number of units held by the participant on the record date.
| n. | Revenue recognition from contracts with customers |
The Company sells its products pursuant to sales contracts entered into with its customers. Revenue associated with the sale of finished gold, gold-copper concentrates and molybdenum products is recognized when control is transferred to the customer. For finished gold and molybdenum products sales, typically, the transfer of control occurs when the customer has taken delivery and the consideration is received, or to be received. For concentrate sales, the transfer of control is based on terms of the sales contracts, generally upon the loading of the ocean vessel or based on negotiated terms which allows for the transfer of control to happen earlier in the sale process.
Revenues from finished gold sales from the Öksüt Mine are based on the LBMA AM spot price stipulated in the agreement with the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (“Central Bank”). Gold doré is sent to the refinery and control is transferred to the customer when gold bars are poured. The Central Bank has the right of first refusal on the purchase of the gold produced. If Central Bank exercises this right, the finished gold is delivered and held at the Central Bank and sold to third party customers through the Central Bank. In both cases, payment is received on the same day of the sale, when control of the finished gold is transferred to the Central Bank.
Revenues from the Company’s concentrate sales are based on a provisional forward sales price, which is subject to adjustments at the time of final pricing. Revenues from concentrate sales are recorded net of treatment and refining charges and the impact of derivative contracts accounted for as hedges of the contained metal.
In 2016, in connection with the acquisition of Thompson Creek Metals Inc., the Company assumed the streaming arrangement (“Gold and Copper Stream Arrangement”) with Royal Gold Inc. (“Royal Gold”) associated with the Mount Milligan Mine. Under the terms of the streaming agreement with the Mount Milligan Mine, the Company delivers to Royal Gold 35% of gold ounces produced and 18.75% of copper produced. Royal Gold pays US$435 per ounce of gold delivered and 15% of the spot price per metric tonne of copper delivered, which is recorded to revenue. Royal Gold also has a security interest over all of the Mount Milligan Mine assets.
Gains and losses related to the Company's forward commodity contracts to economically hedge the Company's commodity price exposure under the Gold and Copper Stream Arrangement, are recorded at fair value each period. To satisfy its obligations under the Gold and Copper Stream Arrangement the Company purchases refined gold and London Metal Exchange (“LME”) copper warrants and arranges for delivery to Royal Gold. Revenue from and costs for refined physical gold and LME copper warrants delivered under the Gold and Copper Stream Arrangement and gains and losses related to the Company's forward commodity contracts to economically hedge the Company's exposure under the Gold and Copper Stream Arrangement are netted and recorded to revenue.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 71 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Provisional prices are finalized in a specified future month (generally one to four months after delivery to the customer) based on spot copper prices on the LME or spot gold prices on the LBMA. The Company receives market prices based on prices in the specified future month, which results in mark-to-market price fluctuations on the related receivable. To the extent final prices are higher or lower than what was recorded on a provisional basis, an increase or decrease to revenues is recorded each reporting period reflecting the estimated forward prices at the date of final pricing. Changes in metal quantities upon receipt of final assay are also adjusted for. Any such adjustments are generally not material to the transaction price.
When sales transactions give rise to potential variable or contingent consideration, the variable consideration is recognized to the extent it can be estimated reliably and it is highly probable that a significant reversal of the amount will not occur in the future. The Company computes the transaction price to a given sales transaction using one of the following methods:
| • | the expected value method: identifies a range of possible consideration amounts, weights the possible consideration amounts by their respective probabilities, and then sums probability-weighted amounts to generate the expected value of consideration to be received from the customer; | |
| • | the most likely value method: the amount determined most likely to be received. |
The Company then applies a constraint to recognize income for variable consideration only to the extent that it is deemed highly probable that a significant reversal of said income will not occur. The Company applies judgment in assessing the probability of occurrence, which is subject to risks and uncertainties.
| o. | Exploration and evaluation expenditures |
Exploration and evaluation expenditures are the costs incurred on the initial search for mineral deposits with economic potential or in the process of obtaining more information about existing mineral deposits. Evaluation expenditures are the costs incurred to establish the technical and commercial viability of developing mineral deposits identified through exploration activities or by acquisition.
Exploration and evaluation expenditures are expensed as incurred unless it can be demonstrated that it is probable that the project will generate a future economic benefit. The exploration and evaluation phase ends when the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting the mineral is demonstrable.
The Company also recognizes exploration and evaluation costs as assets when acquired as part of a business combination, or asset purchase. These assets are recognized at fair value.
| p. | Earnings per share |
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net earnings for a given period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during that same period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if holders with rights to convert instruments to common shares exercise these rights.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 72 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The weighted average number of common shares used to determine diluted earnings per share includes an adjustment, using the treasury stock method, for stock options outstanding. Under the treasury stock method:
| • | The exercise of stock options and restricted share units is assumed to occur at the beginning of the period; | |
| • | The proceeds from the exercise of stock options and restricted share units plus the future period compensation expense on units granted are assumed to be used to purchase common shares of the Company at the average market price during the period; and, | |
| • | The incremental number of common shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) is included in the denominator of the diluted earnings per share computation. |
Equity instruments that could potentially be dilutive in the future, but do not currently have a dilutive effect are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
| r. | Income taxes |
Tax expense is comprised of current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax are recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income except to the extent that they relate to a business combination, or to items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive (loss) income.
Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the tax bases of such assets and liabilities measured using tax rates and laws that are substantively enacted at the reporting date and effective for the reporting period when the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The measurement of deferred tax reflects the tax consequences that would result the way the Company, at the end of the reporting period, intends to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax is not recognized for:
| • | Temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss; | |
| • | Temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled entities to the extent that the group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that such temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future; and, | |
| • | Taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill. |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognized for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 73 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| s. | Derivative instruments and hedge accounting |
The Company may hold derivative instruments to manage its risk exposure to fluctuations of commodity prices, including the Company’s products (for example, gold or copper) and consumables (for example, diesel fuel) and fluctuations in other currencies compared to the US dollar.
Non-derivative financial assets
Non-derivative financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value plus attributable transaction costs, where applicable for financial instruments not classified as fair value through profit or loss. Subsequent to initial recognition, non-derivative financial instruments are classified and measured as described below.
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities are classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and are measured at fair value. Cash equivalents are short-term investments with initial maturities of three months or less. The unrealized gains or losses related to changes in fair value of marketable securities are reported in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings .
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are accounted for at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method.
Hedge derivatives
The Company applies hedge accounting to the following derivative instruments:
| • | Copper contracts which hedge a portion of the copper components of its future concentrate sales, that is not subject to the streaming arrangement with Royal Gold, at the Mount Milligan Mine (“copper contracts”); | |
| • | Fuel hedge contracts to hedge a portion of its estimated future diesel fuel purchases at its Mount Milligan operations (“fuel hedge contracts”); and, | |
| • | Foreign exchange contracts to hedge a portion of its future Canadian denominated expenditures (“foreign exchange contracts”). |
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivative hedging instruments to forecasted transactions. The Company calculates and monitors the hedge ratio, which is resulting from the quantity of the hedged item that the entity hedges and the quantity of the hedging instrument that the entity uses to hedge that quantity of hedged item. Hedge effectiveness is assessed based on the degree to which the cash flows from the derivative contracts are expected to offset the cash flows of the underlying transaction being hedged.
The Company’s copper contracts, fuel hedge contracts and foreign exchange contracts are designated as a cash flow hedging instrument, where the effective portion of changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income. The amounts accumulated in other comprehensive (loss) income are reclassified to the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income, consistent with the classification of the underlying hedged transaction, when the underlying hedged transaction, identified at contract inception, is recognized.
Any ineffective portion of a hedge relationship is recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income. When derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges are terminated, expired, settled or no longer qualify for hedge accounting, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. Amounts historically recorded in other comprehensive (loss) income remain in other comprehensive (loss) income until the underlying hedged transaction is recognized. If the forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, then the amounts accumulated in other comprehensive income are reclassified to the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income as other income or expense immediately.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 74 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Gains or losses arising subsequent to the derivative contracts not qualifying for hedge accounting are recognized in the period in which they arise in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings.
Non-hedge derivatives
All derivative instruments not designated in a hedge relationship are classified as financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss. Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivatives at each reporting date are included in consolidated statements of (loss) earnings as other non-operating expenses, while spot and forward contracts associated with the Royal Gold deliverables are included in revenue.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
IAS 12, Income Taxes
In September 2021, IAS 12 was amended to narrow the scope of the recognition exemption so that it no longer applies to transactions that, on initial recognition, give rise to equal taxable and deductible temporary differences such as deferred taxes on leases and decommissioning obligations. The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and applied retrospectively.
The Company will perform an assessment of the amendment on its financial statements prior to the effective date of January 1, 2023.
IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment
In May 2020, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment that clarify the accounting for the net proceeds from selling any items produced while bringing an item of property, plant and mine development to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. The amendments prohibit entities from deducting amounts received from selling items produced from the cost of property, plant and mine development while the Company is preparing the asset for its intended use. Instead, sales proceeds and the cost of producing these items will be recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2022. The amendments apply retrospectively, but only to assets brought to the location and condition necessary for them to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management on or after the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements in which the Company first applies the amendments. The Company has performed an assessment and concluded that the adoption of these amendments does not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.
| 4. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments |
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the application of the Company’s accounting policies, which are described in note 3. Management believes that the estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from those estimates. The key areas of significant judgments, estimates and assumptions are discussed below.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 75 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| i. | Impairment and impairment reversal of long-lived assets |
Significant judgment is required in assessing indicators of impairment or impairment reversal of long-lived assets. For each asset or CGU, the Company completes an evaluation at each reporting period of potential indicators of impairment or impairment reversal. The Company considers both external and internal sources of information in assessing whether there are any indications that assets or CGUs may be impaired. When completing an impairment test, the Company calculates the estimated recoverable amount of CGUs, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions related to items such as future production levels, operating and capital costs, long-term commodity prices, foreign exchange rates, discount rates, proven and probable reserves and resources, and closure and environmental remediation costs. These estimates and assumptions are subject to risk and uncertainty, particularly in circumstances where there is limited operating history of the asset or CGU. Judgment is also required in determining the appropriate valuation method for mineralization and ascribing anticipated economics to mineralization in cases where only limited or no comprehensive economic study has been completed. Therefore, there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will have an impact on these projections, which may impact the recoverable amount of assets or CGUs. Changes in these estimates which decrease the estimated recoverable amount of a CGU could affect the carrying amounts of assets and result in an impairment charge or reversal. While management believes that estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect the recoverable amount of a CGU.
| ii. | Provision for reclamation |
Provisions for reclamation require the use of estimates of the future costs the Company will incur to complete the reclamation and remediation work required to comply with existing laws and regulations at each mine site, as well as the timing of the reclamation activities and estimated discount rate. The Company assesses and revises its reclamation provision on a periodic basis or when new material information becomes available. Adjustments to the estimated amount and timing of future reclamation cash flows are a normal occurrence in light of the significant judgments and estimates involved. The principal factors that can cause expected cash flows to change are the construction of new processing facilities, changes in the quantities of material in reserves and resources with a corresponding change in the life of mine plan, changing ore characteristics that impact required environmental protection measures and related costs, changes in water quality that impact the extent of water treatment required and changes in laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment.
Actual costs incurred may differ from those amounts estimated. Increases in future costs could materially impact the amounts charged to operations for reclamation and remediation. The provision represents management’s best estimate of the present value of the future reclamation and remediation costs based on environmental disturbances as at the reporting date. A change in any, or a combination of, the key assumptions used to determine the provisions, could have a material impact on the carrying value of the provisions.
| iii. | Deferred income taxes |
The Company operates in a number of tax jurisdictions and is therefore required to estimate its income taxes in each of these tax jurisdictions in preparing its financial statements. In calculating the income taxes, the Company considers factors such as tax rates in the different jurisdictions, non-deductible expenses, changes in tax law and management’s expectations of future results. The Company estimates deferred income taxes based on temporary differences between the income and losses reported in its financial statements and its taxable income and losses as determined under the applicable tax laws. The tax effects of these temporary differences are recorded as deferred tax assets or liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial position. If actual results differ from these estimates, adjustments are made in subsequent periods.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 76 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The Company recognizes deferred income tax benefits related to deferred income tax assets to the extent recovery is more likely than not. Assessing the recoverability of deferred income tax assets requires management to make estimates of future taxable profits. Management generally uses estimates of future taxable profit over the next three years to carry out its assessment. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable profit differ significantly from estimates, the ability of the Company, the net deferred tax assets recorded at the balance sheet date could be impacted. In addition, future changes in tax laws could limit the ability of the Company to obtain tax deductions in future periods from deferred income tax assets.
| iv. | Mineral reserves and resources estimation |
The Company estimates its mineral reserves and resources based on information compiled by qualified persons as defined in accordance with the National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). The estimation of mineral reserves requires judgment to interpret available geological data, select an appropriate mining method and establish an extraction schedule. It also requires assumptions on future commodity prices, foreign exchange rates, production costs, recovery rates, and in some instances, the renewal of mining licenses. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating mineral reserves and resources and assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation which may change significantly when new information becomes available. Changes in such assumptions and estimates may result in the mineral reserves and resources being revised.
Estimates of mineral reserves and resources impact the following items in the consolidated financial statements:
| • | The carrying value of the Company’s property, plant and equipment may be affected due to changes in estimated future cash flows; | |
| • | Depreciation, depletion and amortization charge of assets using the units-of-production method; | |
| • | Estimate of recoverable value of CGUs used for the purpose of impairment or impairment reversal tests of long-lived assets; | |
| • | Estimated timing and costs of reclamation activities; | |
| • | Deferred income and mining taxes, in particular, the evaluation of unrecognized deferred income and mining tax assets; and, | |
| • | Expected future economic benefit of expenditures, including stripping and development activities recognized in the statements of financial position as either part of mine properties or inventories. |
| v. | Derivative financial instruments |
Judgment is required to determine if an effective hedging relationship exists throughout the financial reporting period for derivative financial instruments classified as either fair value or cash flow hedges. Management assesses the relationships on an ongoing basis to determine if hedge accounting is appropriate. The Company monitors, on a regular basis, its hedge position for its risk exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and commodity prices, including prices for gold, copper and fuel. For derivative contracts, valuations are based on forward rates, considering the market price, rate of interest, and volatility, and take into account the credit risk of the financial instrument.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 77 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| vi. | Contingencies |
Contingencies can be either possible assets or possible liabilities arising from past events which, by their nature, will be resolved only when one or more uncertain future events occur or fail to occur. The assessment of the existence and potential impact of contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgment and the use of estimates regarding the outcome o future events.
| vii. | Discontinued Operations |
Significant judgment is required to determine if a component of the Company has been disposed of in the event of a loss of control of a component where there has been no sale transaction including determination of whether the loss of control is a significant economic event that changes the nature of an investment.
| 5. | Discontinued operations |
Loss of control of the Kumtor Mine
On May 6, 2021, the Kyrgyz Republic Parliament passed a temporary management law that allowed the Kyrgyz Republic, in certain circumstances, to assume management authority over Kumtor Gold Company CJSC (“KGC”), the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary that owns the Kumtor Mine. Subsequently, as a result of several coordinated actions, the Kyrgyz Republic seized the Kumtor Mine on May 15, 2021 and appointed an external manager to direct the day-to-day activities of the mine, including production and sale of metals (i.e., the “loss of control event”).
On May 14, 2021, the Company initiated binding international arbitration proceedings against the Kyrgyz Republic to enforce its rights under the longstanding agreements governing the Kumtor Mine. Furthermore, on June 1, 2021, the Company’s two wholly-owned subsidiaries, KGC and Kumtor Operating Company CJSC (“KOC”), filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Federal US Bankruptcy Code in the Southern District of New York.
While the Company remains the legal owner of KGC and KOC, the Company concluded in the second quarter of 2021, that it had lost control of the Kumtor Mine because it cannot effectively exercise power over the relevant activities related to the mine and is no longer exposed to variable returns, nor can it affect the returns of the mine through its managerial involvement. As a result of the loss of control event, the Company deconsolidated the subsidiary, and derecognized the assets and liabilities of the Kumtor Mine at their carrying amounts at the date when control was lost. The Company deemed the loss of control a significant event and concluded that the Kumtor Mine should be treated as a discontinued operation. Consequently, all amounts related to the Kumtor Mine have been classified as a discontinued operation in both the current and comparative periods in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income and consolidated statements of cash flows and the associated notes to the financial statements. However, amounts related to the Kumtor Mine are included in the consolidated statements of financial position for the year ended December 31, 2020.
While the Company is continuing to enforce its rights to the Kumtor Mine through the international arbitration proceedings and other available legal avenues, the Company’s participation in the future cash flows of the Kumtor Mine remains uncertain, and consequently no value was ascribed to the Company’s interest in KGC. A loss on the change of control equal to the net carrying value of assets and liabilities of the Kumtor Mine at the date when control was lost, totalling $926.4 million, was recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income.
The Company assessed that there was no change in circumstances that would justify the remeasurement of its interest in KGC as at December 31, 2021.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 78 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations from the Kumtor Mine, which include the results of operating activities while it was under the Company’s control up to May 15, 2021, for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Revenue | $ | 264,159 | $ | 988,947 | ||||
| Cost of sales | ||||||||
| Production costs | 72,613 | 202,191 | ||||||
| Depreciation | 57,912 | 209,476 | ||||||
| Standby costs | — | 6,728 | ||||||
| Earnings from mine operations | 133,634 | 570,552 | ||||||
| Revenue-based taxes | 36,984 | 138,493 | ||||||
| Exploration and development costs | 8,826 | 15,905 | ||||||
| Other operating expenses | 3,380 | 21,852 | ||||||
| Loss on the change of control of the Kumtor Mine | 926,350 | — | ||||||
| Earnings (loss) from operations | (841,906 | ) | 394,302 | |||||
| Other non-operating (income) expenses | (13,290 | ) | 781 | |||||
| Finance costs | 101 | 1,123 | ||||||
| Net (loss) earnings before income tax | $ | (828,717 | ) | $ | 392,398 | |||
| Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations | $ | (828,717 | ) | $ | 392,398 | |||
Other non-operating income for the year ended December 31, 2021 includes a realized gain of $14.2 million recognized upon early settlement of fuel hedge contracts related to the Kumtor Mine. Additionally, an unrealized gain of $1.1 million was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2021, upon the novation of other fuel hedge contracts which were reassigned to the Mount Milligan Mine upon the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 79 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The assets and liabilities of the Kumtor Mine, over which control was lost, are summarized in the table below:
| Current assets | ||||
| Amounts receivable | $ | 38,238 | ||
| Inventories | 333,556 | |||
| Non-current assets | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 629,374 | |||
| Reclamation deposits | 52,918 | |||
| Other non-current assets | 11,884 | |||
| Assets derecognized | $ | 1,065,970 | ||
| Current liabilities | ||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 63,271 | |||
| Revenue-based taxes payable | 17,003 | |||
| Other current liabilities | 325 | |||
| Non-current liabilities | ||||
| Provision for reclamation | 56,451 | |||
| Other non-current liabilities | 2,570 | |||
| Liabilities derecognized | $ | 139,620 | ||
| Net assets derecognized | $ | 926,350 | ||
While the Kyrgyz Republic brought forward various claims against KGC, the Company does not believe that they have any merit. Accordingly, the Company did not accrue any liability in the accounts of KGC with respect to any of these claims prior to the loss of control event. Refer to note 25 for disclosure regarding the contingency associated with the loss of control event.
| 6. | Impairment reversal |
Mount Milligan Mine
In the third quarter of 2019, as part of the Company’s annual budget and life of mine planning process, the Company identified that cost escalation relating to short- and long-term water-sourcing requirements, higher maintenance costs, higher-than-expected labor requirements, and lower mill throughput estimates, among other things, would continue in the short- to medium-term. All of these factors combined with lower-than-expected long-term gold recoveries, and the expectation that the Mount Milligan Mine’s mineral reserves and resources would be materially reduced, resulted in an indicator for an impairment test on the Mount Milligan Mine’s long-lived assets. Consequently, the Company performed an impairment test and concluded that the carrying amount exceeded its estimated recoverable amount. An impairment loss of $230.5 million was recognized, of which $16.1 million was allocated to reduce goodwill to nil and $214.4 million allocated to other long-lived assets.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, in connection with the annual budget update program as well as periodic assessment of CGUs, the Company identified improved and sustainable performance, increased expectation of resource to reserve conversion and increased long-term gold and copper prices to be indicators to test the Mount Milligan Mine for impairment reversal. In 2021, the Mount Milligan Mine achieved substantially improved operating performance that is expected to be sustained in the future. In addition, in 2021, the Company undertook a significant exploration campaign at the Mount Milligan Mine, which in combination with the lower cost structure of the mine, has increased the Company’s resource to reserve conversion rate expectation for the mine. The Company also observed increased long-term gold and copper price expectation over an extended period of time. As a result of the indicators identified for the Mount Milligan Mine CGU, the Company completed an impairment reversal test in the fourth quarter of 2021.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 80 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The estimated recoverable amount of the Mount Milligan mine CGU as at December 31, 2021 was determined on the basis of FVLCD and calculated by discounting the estimated future net cash flows over the estimated life of the mine. Calculating the FVLCD required management to make estimates and assumptions with respect to future production levels and operating and capital costs in the life of mine plans, future metal prices, foreign exchange rates, discount rate and estimates of the fair value attributable to mineralization in excess of life of mine plans. Changes in any of the assumptions or estimates used in determining the fair values could have impacted the impairment reversal analysis and its conclusions. The key assumptions used in the impairment test for Mount Milligan Mine are summarized in the table below:
| 2021 | ||||
| Gold price per oz - long-term | $ | 1,550 | ||
| Copper price per lb - long-term | $ | 3.50 | ||
| Foreign exchange rates - long-term (US$: C$) | 1.28 | |||
| Discount rate | 6.0 | % | ||
As the Mount Milligan Mine CGU’s estimated recoverable amount exceeded the previous carrying amount less amortization that would have been recognized had the assets not been impaired, an impairment reversal of $160.0 million ($117.3 million, net of tax) was recognized in the impairment reversal line item in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings. This impairment reversal represents the full reversal of prior impairment allocated to long-lived assets, as adjusted for amortization. The discounted cash flow approach uses significant unobservable inputs and is therefore considered Level 3 fair value measurement under the fair value hierarchy.
In 2020, the Company did not identify any indicators of impairment or impairment reversal on long-lived assets.
Key assumptions
The determination of the recoverable amount with Level 3 input of the fair value hierarchy, includes the following key applicable assumptions:
| • | Gold and copper price estimates were determined using forecasts of future prices prepared by industry analysts, which were available as at or close to the valuation date; | |
| • | Foreign exchange rate estimates are based on the outlook of industry analysts; | |
| • | Estimated production levels, and future operating and capital costs are based on detailed life of mine plans and also take into account the Company’s expected development plans. The production levels used were consistent with the reserves volumes developed as part of the Company’s process for the estimation of mineral reserves and resources; | |
| • | Estimates of the fair value attributable to mineralization in excess of life of mine plans are based on various assumptions, including determination of the appropriate valuation method for mineralization, ascribing anticipated economics to mineralization in cases where only limited or no comprehensive economic study has been completed and a value per ounce applied to such mineralization. The resources used were consistent with the resource volumes approved as part of the Company’s process for the estimation of mineral reserves and resources; | |
| • | A real after-tax discount rate was based on the Company’s estimated real weighted-average cost of capital, of which the two main components are the cost of equity and the after-tax cost of debt. The discount rate was adjusted for the specific risks associated with the Mount Milligan Mine. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 81 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| 7. | Sale of Greenstone Partnership |
On January 19, 2021, the Company completed the sale of its 50% interest in the Greenstone Partnership to an affiliate of the Orion Resource Partners (USA) LP (“Orion”). As a result of the closing of this transaction, the Company received cash consideration of $210.0 million, and recognized an initial gain of $72.3 million in the first quarter of 2021.
The following table summarizes the net assets of the Greenstone Partnership interest disposed of:
| January 19, 2021 | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 188 | ||
| Amounts receivable | 175 | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | 139,642 | |||
| Assets held-for-sale | $ | 140,005 | ||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | (2,125 | ) | |
| Lease obligations | (130 | ) | ||
| Liabilities held-for-sale | $ | (2,255 | ) | |
| Net assets disposed of | $ | 137,750 | ||
The Company is entitled to receive additional contingent payments based on a construction decision declaration and the achievement of subsequent production milestones by Greenstone’s project.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Greenstone project was approved for construction by the Greenstone Board. On this basis, the initial contingent payment of $25.0 million became receivable and owing from Orion, payable no later than December 2023. The amount receivable from Orion was recorded in other assets (note 12).
As a result of the construction decision declaration, the Company recognized an additional gain on the sale of Greenstone Partnership of $25.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 resulting in a total gain on the sale of Greenstone Partnership of $97.3 million in 2021.
The additional future contingent payments are payable no later than 30 days following the date on which a cumulative production milestone has been achieved (i.e., a cumulative number of ounces produced or derived from project minerals following the commercial production date). Orion will pay the Company an amount equal to the product of 11,111 ounces multiplied by the 20-day average gold market price on the business day immediately prior to the date of the payment. These additional production milestone targets are: (i) 250,000 ounces; (ii) 500,000 ounces; and, (iii) 750,000 ounces. The Company did not attribute any value to these contingent payments as of December 31, 2021 due to significant uncertainty associated with the Greenstone project.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 82 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| 8. | Amounts Receivable |
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Gold and copper concentrate sales receivable | $ | 31,916 | $ | 22,985 | ||||
| Molybdenum sales receivable | 29,364 | 21,606 | ||||||
| Consumption and income tax receivable(1) | 11,688 | 19,636 | ||||||
| Other receivables | 3,873 | 1,881 | ||||||
| Total amounts receivable | $ | 76,841 | $ | 66,108 | ||||
| (1) | Includes the current portion of value-added tax (“VAT”) receivable of $8.2 million (December 31, 2020 - $16.1 million) at the Öksüt Mine. The non-current portion of VAT receivable is included in other assets (note 12). |
9. Inventories
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Stockpiles of ore(1) | $ | 30,137 | $ | 239,219 | ||||
| Gold in-circuit | 8,108 | 14,682 | ||||||
| Ore on leach pads | 17,314 | 4,768 | ||||||
| Gold doré | 25 | 24,953 | ||||||
| Copper and gold concentrate | 13,702 | 32,201 | ||||||
| Molybdenum inventory | 86,090 | 57,238 | ||||||
| Total product inventories | 155,376 | 373,061 | ||||||
| Supplies (net of provision)(2) | 65,844 | 207,526 | ||||||
| Total inventories | $ | 221,220 | $ | 580,587 | ||||
| (1) | Includes ore in stockpiles not scheduled for processing within the next 12 months, but available on-demand of $23.5 million (December 31, 2020 - $119.2 million, including $85.0 million related to the Kumtor Mine). | |
| (2) | Net of a provision for supplies inventory obsolescence of $8.4 million (December 31, 2020 - $29.2 million, including $21.2 million related to the Kumtor Mine). The non-current portion of supplies inventory is included in other assets (note 12). |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 83 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
10. Other current assets and liabilities
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Other current assets | ||||||||
| Current portion of derivative assets(1) (note 27) | $ | 11,770 | $ | 20,158 | ||||
| Prepaid insurance expenses | 6,867 | 8,932 | ||||||
| Deposits for consumable supplies | 3,836 | 7,976 | ||||||
| Marketable securities | 2,171 | 3,485 | ||||||
| Other | 1,158 | 410 | ||||||
| Total other current assets | $ | 25,802 | $ | 40,961 | ||||
| Other current liabilities | ||||||||
| Current portion of lease obligations (note 16) | $ | 6,144 | $ | 4,575 | ||||
| Current portion of derivative liabilities(1) (note 27) | 2,959 | 9,537 | ||||||
| Current portion of provision for reclamation (note 15) | 6,168 | 1,095 | ||||||
| Revenue-based taxes payable | — | 5,073 | ||||||
| Other | 10 | 115 | ||||||
| Total other current liabilities | $ | 15,281 | $ | 20,395 | ||||
| (1) | Relates to the diesel, foreign exchange and copper hedging contracts (note 27). |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 84 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
11. Property, plant and equipment
The following is a summary of the carrying value of property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”):
| Buildings,
Plant and Equipment |
Mineral Properties(2) | Capitalized Stripping Costs | Construction
Progress |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
| January 1, 2020 | $ | 1,740,855 | $ | 627,075 | $ | 583,498 | $ | 274,546 | $ | 3,225,974 | ||||||||||
| Additions | 7,866 | 40,195 | 200,498 | 150,544 | 399,103 | |||||||||||||||
| Disposal | (6,911 | ) | — | — | — | (6,911 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Transfers | 299,232 | 23,058 | — | (322,290 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Reclassified to assets held- for-sale (note 7) | (625 | ) | (139,436 | ) | — | — | (140,061 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2020 | $ | 2,040,417 | $ | 550,892 | $ | 783,996 | $ | 102,800 | $ | 3,478,105 | ||||||||||
| Additions | 14,098 | 17,819 | 67,075 | 115,643 | 214,635 | |||||||||||||||
| Disposal(1) | (17,402 | ) | — | — | — | (17,402 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Amount derecognized to loss of control of the Kumtor Mine | (1,036,550 | ) | (186,066 | ) | (792,009 | ) | (99,386 | ) | (2,114,011 | ) | ||||||||||
| Transfers | 61,249 | — | — | (61,249 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Impairment reversal | 125,774 | 34,226 | — | — | 160,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2021 | $ | 1,187,586 | $ | 416,871 | $ | 59,062 | $ | 57,808 | $ | 1,721,327 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and other charges | ||||||||||||||||||||
| January 1, 2020 | $ | 997,901 | $ | 166,269 | $ | 392,288 | $ | — | $ | 1,556,458 | ||||||||||
| Charge for the year | 156,015 | 24,045 | 52,853 | — | 232,913 | |||||||||||||||
| Disposals | (4,303 | ) | — | — | — | (4,303 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Impairment(3) | — | 7,389 | — | — | 7,389 | |||||||||||||||
| Reclassified to assets held- for-sale (note 7) | (419 | ) | — | — | — | (419 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,149,194 | $ | 197,703 | $ | 445,141 | $ | — | $ | 1,792,038 | ||||||||||
| Charge for the year | 114,634 | 20,250 | 13,280 | — | 148,164 | |||||||||||||||
| Disposals | (6,329 | ) | — | — | — | (6,329 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Amount derecognized to loss of control of the Kumtor Mine | (905,388 | ) | (155,980 | ) | (423,269 | ) | — | (1,484,637 | ) | |||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2021 | $ | 352,111 | $ | 61,973 | $ | 35,152 | $ | — | $ | 449,236 | ||||||||||
| Net book value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance January 1, 2021 | $ | 891,223 | $ | 353,189 | $ | 338,855 | $ | 102,800 | $ | 1,686,067 | ||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2021 | $ | 835,475 | $ | 354,898 | $ | 23,910 | $ | 57,808 | $ | 1,272,091 | ||||||||||
| (1) | Relates primarily to the disposal of the unutilized plot of land near the Thomson Creek Mine. |
| (2) | Includes revenue earned from sales at the Öksüt Mine net of related costs of $6.9 million attributable to gold ounces sold prior to achieving commercial production on May 31, 2020. |
| (3) | Relates to non-core exploration properties that were impaired to their recoverable amounts. The loss of $7.4 million is included in the non-operating expenses in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 85 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
During the year ended December 31, 2021, $95.7 million of additions related to the Kumtor Mine were capitalized to the PP&E and, as a result of the loss of control of the Kumtor Mine (note 5), assets with a net book value of $629.4 million were derecognized.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company disposed of PP&E with a carrying value of $14.9 million (2020 – $2.6 million). The net gain on disposal of $0.9 million (2020 – net loss of $1.1 million) was recorded in the other non-operating expenses line item in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings.
12. Other non-current assets and liabilities
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Other non-current assets | ||||||||
| VAT receivable(1) | $ | 1,676 | $ | 7,734 | ||||
| Non-current derivative assets(2) | 2,460 | 8,339 | ||||||
| Prepayments for property, plant and equipment | 349 | 8,763 | ||||||
| Reclamation deposits(3) | 92 | 47,083 | ||||||
| Receivable from Orion (note 7) | 25,000 | — | ||||||
| Long-term inventory | 1,734 | 1,747 | ||||||
| Other | 773 | 3,435 | ||||||
| Total other non-current assets | $ | 32,084 | $ | 77,101 | ||||
| Other non-current liabilities | ||||||||
| Long-term portion of lease obligations (note 16) | $ | 14,053 | $ | 14,340 | ||||
| Post-retirement benefits | 4,382 | 4,060 | ||||||
| Non-current derivative liabilities(2) | 990 | 3,141 | ||||||
| Total other non-current liabilities | $ | 19,425 | $ | 21,541 | ||||
| (1) | Relates to the Öksüt Mine. | |
| (2) | Relates to the diesel, foreign exchange and copper hedging contracts (note 27). | |
| (3) | The decrease relates primarily to the derecognition of amounts upon loss of control of the Kumtor Mine (note 5). |
13. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Trade payables and accruals(1) | $ | 66,999 | $ | 113,541 | ||||
| Royalties payable | 23,736 | 23,832 | ||||||
| Wages, salaries and benefits payable | 7,534 | 18,273 | ||||||
| Amount due on the settlement of derivatives | 12,878 | — | ||||||
| Amount due to Royal Gold(2) | 64,229 | 48,874 | ||||||
| Liability for share-based compensation (note 23) | 11,444 | 28,184 | ||||||
| Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 186,820 | $ | 232,704 | ||||
| (1) | The decrease relates primarily to the derecognition of amounts upon loss of control of the Kumtor Mine (note 5). | |
| (2) | Royal Gold holds a streaming interest in the production at the Mount Milligan Mine. As a result, when a trade receivable is recorded in relation to a third-party customer gold and copper concentrate delivery, a corresponding liability to Royal Gold is recorded. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 86 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| 14. | Debt |
Corporate Facility
On December 31, 2020, the Company entered into a $400.0 million four-year revolving credit facility (the “Corporate Facility”). The interest rate payable on any outstanding borrowings under the Corporate Facility is LIBOR, plus 2.25% to 3.25% and the maturity date of the Corporate Facility is December 31, 2024. As at December 31, 2021, the Corporate Facility was undrawn (December 31, 2020 - $nil).
| 15. | Provision for reclamation |
The Company completed its regularly scheduled update to its closure costs estimates in December 2021. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending carrying amounts of the Company’s provision for reclamation. The settlement of the provision is estimated to occur through to 2136.
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Non-operating sites (1) | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 236,542 | $ | 180,404 | ||||
| Reclassification of the Öksüt Mine | — | (2,600 | ) | |||||
| Changes in estimate | 17,934 | 7,961 | ||||||
| Changes in discount rate | 11,395 | 46,593 | ||||||
| Accretion | 1,623 | 2,252 | ||||||
| Liabilities settled | (470 | ) | (245 | ) | ||||
| Foreign exchange revaluation | 713 | 2,177 | ||||||
| Balance, end of year | $ | 267,737 | $ | 236,542 | ||||
| Operating sites (1) | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 115,702 | $ | 84,799 | ||||
| Amount derecognized due to loss of control of the Kumtor Mine | (56,451 | ) | — | |||||
| Reclassification of Öksüt Mine | — | 2,600 | ||||||
| Changes in estimate | 6,591 | 24,433 | ||||||
| Changes in discount rate | 3,662 | 2,007 | ||||||
| Accretion | 3 | 1,000 | ||||||
| Foreign exchange revaluation | 236 | 863 | ||||||
| Balance, end of year | $ | 69,743 | $ | 115,702 | ||||
| Current portion of reclamation provision | $ | 6,168 | $ | 1,095 | ||||
| Non-current portion of reclamation provision | 331,312 | 351,149 | ||||||
| Total provision for reclamation | $ | 337,480 | $ | 352,244 | ||||
| (1) | Non-operating sites include the Endako Mine, Thompson Creek Mine and Kemess Project. Operating sites include the Mount Milligan Mine, Öksüt Mine and Kumtor Mine up to the loss of control event. |
Reclamation expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $23.3 million and was primarily attributable to changes in future reclamation cash flow estimates and changes in the discount rates at the Endako Mine and the Thompson Creek Mine. Reclamation expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $53.4 million and was primarily attributable to changes in the discount rates at the Endako Mine and the Thompson Creek Mine.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 87 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Regulatory authorities in certain jurisdictions require that security be provided to cover the estimated reclamation and remediation obligations. As at December 31, 2021, the Company has provided the regulatory authorities with $165.7 million (December 31, 2020 - $160.4 million) in reclamation bonds and letters of credit for mine closure obligations.
| 16. | Leases |
The following table is a maturity analysis of the Company’s contractual undiscounted payments required to meet obligations that have initial or remaining non-cancellable lease terms.
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Less than one year | $ | 6,592 | $ | 5,444 | ||||
| One to three years | 9,185 | 7,510 | ||||||
| More than three years | 5,945 | 7,947 | ||||||
| Total undiscounted lease obligations | $ | 21,722 | $ | 20,901 | ||||
The following table sets out the carrying amounts of ROU assets included in PP&E in the consolidated statements of financial position and the movements during the period:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 17,310 | $ | 21,298 | ||||
| Additions | 6,809 | 1,192 | ||||||
| Amortization | (4,705 | ) | (5,180 | ) | ||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,414 | $ | 17,310 | ||||
The following table sets out the lease obligations included in the consolidated statements of financial position:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Current (note 10) | $ | 6,144 | $ | 4,575 | ||||
| Non-current (note 12) | 14,053 | 14,340 | ||||||
| Total lease obligations | $ | 20,197 | $ | 18,915 | ||||
The amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings related to lease obligations are as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Interest expense on lease liabilities | $ | 715 | $ | 921 | ||||
| Amortization of ROU assets | 4,705 | 5,180 | ||||||
| Variable lease payments not included in the measurement of lease liabilities | 32,106 | 22,721 | ||||||
| Expenses relating to leases of low-value assets and short-term leases | 1,568 | 3,987 | ||||||
| Total recognized in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings | $ | 39,094 | $ | 32,809 | ||||
In addition to the above, for the year ended December 31, 2020, there was $7.6 million of variable lease payments not included in the measurement of lease liabilities related to the Öksüt Mine that was capitalized to property, plant and equipment prior to achieving commercial production on May 31, 2020.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 88 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
17. Revenue
Total revenue consists of the following:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Gold revenue | $ | 467,990 | $ | 385,405 | ||||
| Copper revenue | 209,644 | 173,473 | ||||||
| Molybdenum revenue | 187,162 | 136,954 | ||||||
| Other by-product revenue(1) | 17,796 | 14,764 | ||||||
| Revenue from contracts with customers | $ | 882,592 | $ | 710,596 | ||||
| Metal content and provisional pricing adjustments on concentrate sales | 17,549 | 10,666 | ||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 900,141 | $ | 721,262 | ||||
| (1) | Includes silver, rhenium and sulfuric acid sales. |
Total revenue by metals, including metal content and provisional pricing adjustments on concentrate sales, is as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Gold revenue | $ | 467,355 | $ | 391,503 | ||||
| Copper revenue | 227,715 | 178,597 | ||||||
| Molybdenum revenue | 187,162 | 136,954 | ||||||
| Other by-product revenue | 17,909 | 14,208 | ||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 900,141 | $ | 721,262 | ||||
Customer Information
The following table presents sales to the individual customers that exceed 10.0% of total revenue:
| Region | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
| Customer 1 | Turkey | $ | 142,841 | $ | 125,870 | |||||||
| Customer 2 | Canada | 127,942 | 125,154 | |||||||||
| Customer 3 | Canada | 116,705 | 89,810 | |||||||||
| Total sales to customers exceeding 10.0% of total revenue | $ | 387,488 | $ | 340,834 | ||||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 43.0 | % | 47.3 | % | ||||||||
18. Corporate administration
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Administration and office costs | $ | 25,833 | $ | 27,203 | ||||
| Share-based compensation(1) | 1,301 | 18,471 | ||||||
| Corporate administration | $ | 27,134 | $ | 45,674 | ||||
| (1) | Relates to the share-based compensation liability of $11.4 million as at December 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020 - $28.2 million). |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 89 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
19. Other operating expenses
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Selling and marketing(1) | $ | 11,333 | $ | 10,090 | ||||
| Other | 1,426 | 1,772 | ||||||
| Other operating expenses | $ | 12,759 | $ | 11,862 | ||||
| (1) | Primarily includes freight charges associated with the Mount Milligan Mine and the Langeloth processing facility. |
20. Other non-operating expenses
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Kumtor Mine litigation and related costs(1) | $ | 27,547 | $ | — | ||||
| Other | (4,054 | ) | 6,247 | |||||
| Other non-operating expenses | $ | 23,493 | $ | 6,247 | ||||
| (1) | Primarily includes legal fees related to the Company’s international arbitration claim against the Kyrgyz Republic, negotiations with the government of Kyrgyz Republic and the filing for protection under Chapter 11 under the Federal US Bankruptcy Code by KGC and KOC, and related consulting costs. |
21. Finance costs
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Stand-by and transaction fees | $ | 2,364 | $ | 5,320 | ||||
| Interest on Credit Facility | 55 | 3,613 | ||||||
| Accretion expense on the provision for reclamation | 1,626 | 2,252 | ||||||
| Interest expense on lease liabilities | 715 | 921 | ||||||
| Other financing fees | 2 | 1,712 | ||||||
| Total finance costs | $ | 4,762 | $ | 13,818 | ||||
22. Taxes
a. Income tax (recovery) expense
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Current income taxes | $ | 40,087 | $ | 6,228 | ||||
| Deferred income taxes | (84,102 | ) | 1,481 | |||||
| Total income tax (recovery) expense | $ | (44,015 | ) | $ | 7,709 | |||
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 90 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Income tax (recovery) expense differs from the amount that would arise from applying the Canadian federal and provincial statutory income tax rates to earnings before income tax as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Earnings before income tax | $ | 402,934 | $ | 23,849 | ||||
| Income tax at statutory tax rate of 26.5% | 106,778 | 6,320 | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) due to: | ||||||||
| Difference between Canadian and foreign tax rates(1) | (7,008 | ) | (15,379 | ) | ||||
| Change in unrecognized deductible temporary differences | (172,247 | ) | 4,597 | |||||
| Impact of foreign currency on deferred tax balances | 25,515 | 11,076 | ||||||
| Non-deductible costs | (1,875 | ) | 26 | |||||
| Local mining taxes | 4,574 | 2,323 | ||||||
| Impact of tax legislation/rate change | — | (1,279 | ) | |||||
| Other | 248 | 25 | ||||||
| Income tax (recovery) expense | $ | (44,015 | ) | $ | 7,709 | |||
| (1) | Income tax (recovery) expense in 2021 included $8.7 million (2020 - $10.0 million) of withholding tax expense related to the Öksüt Mine. |
b. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities
The following are significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Deferred income tax assets | ||||||||
| Provisions - asset retirement obligations and other | $ | 55,341 | $ | 14,573 | ||||
| Tax losses | 85,415 | 50,043 | ||||||
| Total deferred income tax assets | $ | 140,756 | $ | 64,616 | ||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | ||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | $ | 81,917 | $ | 85,689 | ||||
| Investments in subsidiaries | 12,400 | 10,000 | ||||||
| Assets held-for-sale | — | 8,400 | ||||||
| Total deferred income tax liabilities | $ | 94,317 | $ | 104,089 | ||||
| Net deferred income tax (assets)/ liabilities | $ | (46,439 | ) | $ | 39,473 | |||
The deferred income tax asset of $140.8 million is expected to be realized in more than one year. The deferred income tax liability of $94.3 million includes $81.9 million expected to be realized in more than one year.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 91 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
After offsetting deferred income tax assets against deferred income tax liabilities in the same taxable entity, the resulting balances are as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Deferred income tax assets | $ | (101,300 | ) | $ | — | |||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 54,861 | 39,473 | ||||||
| Net deferred income tax (assets)/ liability | $ | (46,439 | ) | $ | 39,473 | |||
A reconciliation of the movements of the deferred income tax assets and liabilities is provided below:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Balance at the beginning of year | $ | 39,473 | $ | 33,733 | ||||
| Recognized in the statement of earnings | (84,102 | ) | 1,481 | |||||
| Recognized in other comprehensive income | (1,810 | ) | 4,259 | |||||
| Balance at the end of the year | $ | (46,439 | ) | $ | 39,473 | |||
The deferred income tax recovery of $84.1 million recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings includes the amount related to the recognition of deferred income tax assets of $101.3 million (2020 - $nil) for the Mount Milligan Mine. Deferred income tax assets were recognized as a result of the periodic assessment performed as at December 31, 2021 to conclude that it was more likely than not that the related tax benefit will be realized in the future based on the expectation of future earnings.
The Company has not recognized deferred income tax assets with respect to the following deductible temporary differences:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Deductible temporary differences(1) | $ | 443,000 | $ | 921,457 | ||||
| British Columbia mining tax deductible temporary differences | 566,800 | 817,200 | ||||||
| British Columbia mining tax credits | 1,400 | 28,700 | ||||||
| Capital losses | 5,100 | 9,480 | ||||||
| Total deductible temporary differences | $ | 1,016,300 | $ | 1,776,837 | ||||
| (1) | The deductible temporary differences consist of $251.6 million for Canada (December 31, 2020 - $758.5 million), $160.5 million for the United States (December 31, 2020 - $137.2 million) and $30.9 million for Turkey (December 31, 2020 - $25.7 million). |
The capital loss carry forwards and deductible temporary differences have no expiry date.
| Expiry dates of tax losses | 2028 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||
| Non-capital tax losses(1) | ||||||||||||
| Canada | $ | 8,940 | $ | 657,928 | $ | 666,868 | ||||||
| United States | 496 | 144,842 | 145,338 | |||||||||
| $ | 9,436 | $ | 802,770 | $ | 812,206 | |||||||
| (1) | Represents the gross amount of tax loss carry forwards translated at the closing exchange rate as at December 31, 2021. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 92 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The non-capital tax losses include $509.3 million of losses which are not recognized as deferred income tax assets. In addition, the non-capital tax losses for the United States include $75.6 million that are restricted due to the change in ownership.
23. Shareholders' equity
a. Earnings (loss) per share
Computation for basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Earnings - continuing operations | $ | 446,949 | $ | 16,140 | ||||
| Dilutive impact related to the RSU plan | (1,022 | ) | ||||||
| Dilutive impact related to PSU plan | (4,291 | ) | — | |||||
| Diluted earnings - continuing operations for diluted earnings per share | $ | 441,636 | $ | 16,140 | ||||
| Basic weighted average common shares | 296,630 | 294,718 | ||||||
| Dilutive impact of stock options | 633 | 1,500 | ||||||
| Dilutive impact related to the RSU plan | 1,024 | — | ||||||
| Diluted weighted average common shares | 298,287 | 296,218 | ||||||
| Earnings per share - continuing operations: | ||||||||
| Basic | $ | 1.51 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
| Diluted | $ | 1.48 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Computation for basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations | $ | (828,717 | ) | $ | 392,398 | |||
| Basic and diluted weighted average common shares | 296,630 | 294,718 | ||||||
| (Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations - basic and diluted | $ | (2.79 | ) | $ | 1.33 | |||
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 93 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Computation for basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Net (loss) earnings | $ | (381,768 | ) | $ | 408,538 | |||
| Dilutive impact related to the RSU plan | — | 398 | ||||||
| Dilutive impact related to PSU plan | — | — | ||||||
| Diluted (loss) earnings | $ | (381,768 | ) | $ | 408,936 | |||
| Basic weighted average common shares | 296,630 | 294,718 | ||||||
| Dilutive impact of stock options | — | 1,500 | ||||||
| Dilutive impact related to the RSU plan | — | 1,193 | ||||||
| Diluted weighted average common shares | 296,630 | 297,411 | ||||||
| (Loss) earnings per share: | ||||||||
| Basic | $ | (1.29 | ) | $ | 1.39 | |||
| Diluted | $ | (1.29 | ) | $ | 1.37 | |||
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, certain potentially anti-dilutive securities, including stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share due to the exercise prices being greater than the average market price of the Company’s common shares for the respective periods.
Anti-dilutive securities, excluded from the calculation, are summarized below:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Excluded from earnings per share from continuing operations | — | 1,193 | ||||||
| Excluded from (loss) earnings per share | 1,657 | — | ||||||
| 1,657 | 1,193 | |||||||
b. Share-based compensation
The impact of share-based compensation as of and for the years ended December 31, 2021and 2020 is summarized as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Expense | Liability | Expense | Liability | |||||||||||||
| Stock options | $ | 1,676 | $ | — | $ | 2,078 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Performance share units | (1,654 | ) | 7,054 | 16,883 | 22,316 | |||||||||||
| Deferred share units | (874 | ) | 2,936 | 1,632 | 3,780 | |||||||||||
| Restricted share units | 2,215 | 1,454 | 1,380 | 2,088 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 1,363 | $ | 11,444 | $ | 21,973 | $ | 28,184 | |||||||||
Employee Stock Options
Under the Company’s Stock Option plan, options to purchase common shares of the Company may be granted to officers and employees. The exercise price of options granted under this plan is not less than the weighted average common share price for the five trading days prior to the date of grant. Options granted vest over three years and expire after eight years from the date granted. The Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 94 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Centerra’s stock options transactions during the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||
| Balance, January 1 | 3,335,399 | C$ | 7.97 | 4,372,480 | C$ | 7.31 | ||||||||||
| Granted | 883,981 | 12.22 | 750,642 | 12.41 | ||||||||||||
| Forfeited | (239,849 | ) | (10.75 | ) | (297,258 | ) | (7.24 | ) | ||||||||
| Exercised | (756,056 | ) | (6.68 | ) | (1,490,465 | ) | (7.03 | ) | ||||||||
| Outstanding, end of year | 3,223,475 | C$ | 9.23 | 3,335,399 | C$ | 7.97 | ||||||||||
| Options exercisable, end of year | 1,615,829 | C$ | 7.37 | 1,377,696 | C$ | 6.50 | ||||||||||
The weighted average market price of shares issued for options exercised in the year ended December 31, 2021 was C$11.74 (December 31, 2020 - C$15.00).
The following table summarizes information related to share options outstanding at December 31, 2021:
| Share options outstanding | Share options exercisable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Range |
Number
of | Weighted
Average remaining contractual life (years) |
Weighted
|
Number
of | Weighted
Average remaining contractual life (years) |
Weighted
| |||||||||||||||||||
| C$5.04 - C$6.05 | 449,384 | 0.87 | C$ | 5.74 | 449,384 | 0.87 | C$ | 5.74 | |||||||||||||||||
| C$6.06 - C$6.73 | 729,782 | 5.16 | 6.71 | 374,073 | 5.15 | 6.71 | |||||||||||||||||||
| C$6.74 - C$7.56 | 554,716 | 3.56 | 6.94 | 554,716 | 3.56 | 6.94 | |||||||||||||||||||
| C$7.57 - C$11.85 | 26,924 | 5.62 | 11.85 | 17,947 | 5.62 | 11.85 | |||||||||||||||||||
| C$11.86 - C$12.51 | 803,524 | 7.18 | 12 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| C$12.52 - C$17.98 | 659,145 | 6.36 | 12.56 | 219,709 | 6.36 | 12.56 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 3,223,475 | 5.04 | C$ | 9.23 | 1,615,829 | 3.59 | C$ | 7.37 | |||||||||||||||||
The Company used the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate fair value of stock options using the following weighted average assumptions:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Expected stock price volatility | 50.06% - 56.35% | 47.31% - 54.48% | ||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.29% - 0.90% | 0.26% - 0.41% | ||||||
| Expected life (in years) | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 5.0 | ||||||
| Expected dividend yield | 1.61% | 1.06% - 1.23% | ||||||
| Exercise price | $12.22 | $12.52 - $17.98 | ||||||
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 95 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Performance Share Unit plan
Centerra’s PSU plan transactions during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
| Number of units | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Balance, January 1 | 1,862,267 | 1,918,784 | |||||||
| Granted | 545,898 | 695,048 | |||||||
| Exercised | (748,593 | ) | (538,752 | ) | |||||
| Forfeited | (282,164 | ) | (212,813 | ) | |||||
| Balance, December 31 | 1,377,408 | 1,862,267 | |||||||
Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 703,364 PSUs.
Deferred Share Unit plan
Centerra’s DSU plan transactions during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
| Number of units | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Balance, January 1 | 319,746 | 276,844 | ||||||
| Granted | 63,102 | 42,902 | ||||||
| Exercised | — | — | ||||||
| Balance, December 31 | 382,848 | 319,746 | ||||||
Restricted Share Unit plan
Centerra’s RSU plan transactions during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
| Number of units | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Balance, January 1 | 951,471 | 1,244,943 | ||||||
| Granted | 444,075 | 351,194 | ||||||
| Redeemed | (455,870 | ) | (644,666 | ) | ||||
| Balance, December 31 | 939,676 | 951,471 | ||||||
d. ESPP
In 2021, 137,203 common shares were subscribed for under the ESPP (2020 – 125,350 common shares) for a value of $1.2 million (2020 – $1.1 million).
e. Dividends
On May 17, 2021, the Company announced that, as a result of the seizure of the Kumtor Mine by the Kyrgyz Republic, dividends or distributions on the Company’s common shares that would otherwise be payable to Kyrgyzaltyn JSC (“Kyrgyzaltyn”) (a significant shareholder of the Company and an instrumentality of the Kyrgyz Republic), or its affiliates, would be waived and donated to the Company, to the extent such dividends or distributions could be attributed reasonably to KGC, the Kumtor Mine’s assets and operations or distributions from KGC under the 2009 Restated Shareholders’ Agreement (the “2009 RSA"). As a result, Kyrgyzaltyn did not receive its portion of the C$0.05 per share dividend paid on June 10, 2021, the C$0.07 per share dividend paid on September 8, 2021 or C$0.07 share dividend paid on December 3, 2021. Based on the Company’s interpretation of the 2009 RSA, the Company does not believe it has an obligation related to these amounts, totalling $11.7 million ($11.1 million, net of withholding taxes) in the future.
On February 24, 2022, the Board approved another quarterly dividend of C$0.07 per share to shareholders of record on March 11, 2022.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 96 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
24. Supplemental disclosure
a. Changes in working capital
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| (Increase) decrease in amounts receivable | $ | (6,520 | ) | $ | 46,437 | |||
| (Increase) in inventory | (21,399 | ) | (10,675 | ) | ||||
| (Increase) in prepaid expenses | (1,402 | ) | (212 | ) | ||||
| Increase in trade creditors and accruals | 15,058 | 12,777 | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) in other taxes payable | 1,492 | (25,739 | ) | |||||
| Changes in working capital | $ | (12,771 | ) | $ | 22,588 | |||
b. Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
| As at December 31, 2020 | Changes
from financing cash flows | Lease obligation additions | Impact
of foreign exchange | Amount
derecognized due to loss of control of the Kumtor Mine | As at December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Lease obligations(1) | $ | 18,915 | $ | (6,476 | ) | $ | 9,867 | $ | 455 | $ | (2,564 | ) | $ | 20,197 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities from financing activities | $ | 18,915 | $ | (6,476 | ) | $ | 9,867 | $ | 455 | $ | (2,564 | ) | $ | 20,197 | ||||||||||
| (1) | Current portion of lease obligations included in other current liabilities (note 10). Long-term portion of lease obligations included in other liabilities (note 12). |
| As at | Changes from | Lease | Impact of | Amortization of deferred | As at | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2019 | financing
cash flows | obligation additions | oreign
exchange | financing costs | Other | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease obligations | $ | 22,639 | $ | (6,037 | ) | $ | 1,196 | $ | 915 | $ | — | $ | 202 | $ | 18,915 | |||||||||||||
| Debt | 70,007 | (77,472 | ) | — | — | 7,465 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities from financing activities | $ | 92,646 | $ | (83,509 | ) | $ | 1,196 | $ | 915 | $ | 7,465 | $ | 202 | $ | 18,915 | |||||||||||||
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 97 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
25. Commitments and contingencies Commitments
The Company had the following purchase commitments as of December 31, 2021, of which $6.1 million related to capital expenditures:
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase and capital commitments | $ | 14,775 | $ | 168 | $ | 41 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 14,986 | ||||||||||||
Contingencies
Kumtor Mine
As a result of the loss of control event, the Company deconsolidated KGC, and derecognized the assets and liabilities of the Kumtor Mine at their carrying amounts at the date when control was lost (note 5).
On May 17, 2021, the Company announced that it initiated binding arbitration against the Kyrgyz Republic to enforce its rights under longstanding agreements governing the Kumtor Mine and to, among other things, hold the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic accountable in the arbitration for any and all losses and damage that result from its actions against KGC and the Kumtor Mine. Subsequently, this claim was amended to add Kyrgyzaltyn as a respondent.
These claims are to be adjudicated by a single arbitrator in the Kumtor Arbitration Proceedings to be held at Stockholm, Sweden and conducted under the arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. The applicable governing law of most of the longstanding agreements with the Kyrgyz Republic and Kyrgyzaltyn is the law of the State of New York and of England. Following the resignation of the arbitrator, a new arbitrator has been appointed to adjudicate the arbitration dispute. The Company also filed an application requesting urgent interim measures in connection with the arbitration proceedings to address certain critical operational and safety problems at the Kumtor Mine, to preserve the status quo at the Kumtor Mine and obtain some transparency and reporting as to the mine’s activities.
Centerra will continue to pursue all measures necessary to protect its rights in arbitration and in other legal proceedings and the Company is in discussions with the Kyrgyz Republic to resolve the outstanding disputes; however, no assurances can be given that Centerra will be successful in the foregoing legal proceedings or that the Company will be able to negotiate a solution to the disputes relating to the Kumtor Mine.
Mount Milligan Mine
In 2020, the Company received a notice of civil claim in the first quarter of 2020 from H.R.S. Resources Corp. (“H.R.S.”), the holder of a 2% production royalty at Mount Milligan. H.R.S. claims that since November 2016 (when the royalty became payable) the Company has incorrectly calculated amounts payable under the production royalty agreement and has therefore underpaid amounts owing to H.R.S. The Company disputes the claim and believes it has correctly calculated the royalty payments in accordance with the agreement. The Company believes that the potential exposure in relation to this claim over what the Company has accrued, is not material.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 98 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| 26. | Related party transactions |
| a. | Kyrgyzaltyn |
The breakdown of sales transactions in the normal course of business with Kyrgyzaltyn, prior to the loss of control event in respect of the Kumtor Mine, is as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Gross gold and silver sales to Kyrgyzaltyn | $ | 265,407 | $ | 995,111 | ||||
| Deduct: refinery and financing charges | (1,248 | ) | (6,164 | ) | ||||
| Net revenue received from Kyrgyzaltyn(1) | $ | 264,159 | $ | 988,947 | ||||
| (1) | Presented in results from discontinued operations. |
| b. | Sojitz Corporation |
The Endako Mine is operated as a joint operation between the Company, holding a 75% interest, and Sojitz Corporation (“Sojitz”), a Japanese company, holding a 25% interest. The Langeloth Facility which is part of the Molybdenum BU segment sells refined molybdenum concentrate product to Sojitz.
The breakdown of the Company’s transactions in the normal course of business with Sojitz is as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Sales to Sojitz | $ | 24,780 | $ | 12,469 | ||||
| Deduct: commission charges | (305 | ) | (253 | ) | ||||
| Revenue(1) | $ | 24,475 | $ | 12,216 | ||||
| (1) | Amount receivable from Sojitz as at December 31, 2021 was $2.6 million (December 31, 2020 - $0.3 million ). |
| c. | Transactions with key management personnel |
The Company transacts with key management personnel, who have authority and responsibility to plan, direct and control the activities of the Company and receive compensation for services rendered in that capacity. Key management personnel include members of the Board of Directors and members of the senior leadership team.
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, remuneration to key management personnel was as follows:
Compensation of key management personnel
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Director fees earned and other compensation | $ | 754 | $ | 820 | ||||
| Salaries and benefits | 7,830 | 6,354 | ||||||
| Share-based compensation | 1,894 | 12,275 | ||||||
| Total compensation | $ | 10,478 | $ | 19,449 | ||||
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 99 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| 27. | Financial instruments |
The Company’s financial instruments include marketable securities, amounts receivable (including embedded derivatives), derivative financial instruments, accounts payable and accrued liabilities (including share-based compensation liability) and other assets (including amounts receivable from Orion).
| a. | Derivative financial instruments |
The Company uses derivative financial instruments as part of its risk management program to mitigate exposures to various market risks including commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and the diesel fuel prices. The Company’s derivative counterparties are syndicate members of the Company’s Corporate Facility, mitigating credit risk, and on an ongoing basis, the Company monitors its derivative position exposures.
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Derivative instrument assets | ||||||||
| Current | ||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 7,708 | $ | 13,780 | ||||
| Fuel contracts | 3,369 | 4,910 | ||||||
| Royal Gold deliverables(1) | — | 1,468 | ||||||
| Copper contracts | 693 | — | ||||||
| $ | 11,770 | $ | 20,158 | |||||
| Non-current | ||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | 550 | 5,593 | ||||||
| Fuel contracts | 852 | 2,746 | ||||||
| Copper contracts | 1,058 | — | ||||||
| 2,460 | 8,339 | |||||||
| Total derivative instrument assets | $ | 14,230 | $ | 28,497 | ||||
| Derivative instrument liabilities | ||||||||
| Current | ||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 22 | $ | — | ||||
| Fuel contracts | — | 401 | ||||||
| Royal Gold deliverables(1) | — | 57 | ||||||
| Copper contracts | 2,937 | 9,079 | ||||||
| $ | 2,959 | $ | 9,537 | |||||
| Non-current | ||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | 984 | — | ||||||
| Fuel contracts | 6 | 1,381 | ||||||
| Copper contracts | — | 1,760 | ||||||
| 990 | 3,141 | |||||||
| Total derivative instrument liabilities | $ | 3,949 | $ | 12,678 | ||||
| (1) | Relates to Royal Gold deliverables which are gold and copper forward contracts for gold ounces and copper pounds payable to Royal Gold. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 100 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Hedge derivatives
The derivative instruments outstanding as at December 31, 2021 that are accounted for as hedges are summarized below:
| Average Strike Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Instrument | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Type | Total
Position | ||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel hedge contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ULSD zero-cost collars | Barrels | $62/$68 | $73/$78 | N/A | Fixed | 58,600 | ||||||||||||||||||
| ULSD swap contracts | Barrels | $62 | $79 | $82 | Fixed | 121,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| US$/C$ zero cost-collars | CAD | $1.29/$1.36 | $1.24/$1.29 | $1.25/$1.33 | Fixed | 400,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| US$/C$ forward contracts | CAD | $1.29 | $1.26 | $1.29 | Fixed | 264,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Copper contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copper zero-cost collar contracts | Pounds | $3.66/$4.84 | $4.00/$4.89 | N/A | Fixed | 57,100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fuel contracts
The Company applies hedge accounting to derivative instruments which hedge a portion of its estimated future diesel fuel purchases at its Mount Milligan operations to manage the risk associated with changes in diesel fuel prices to the cost of operations at the Mount Milligan Mine. The fuel hedge contracts are expected to settle by the end of 2024.
In the second quarter of 2021, the Company discontinued all hedge positions related to future fuel purchases at the Kumtor Mine after May 15, 2021. Unwinding these positions in the second quarter resulted in a realized gain on discontinuance of $14.2 million recognized in net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income. To the extent the Kumtor Mine’s hedging relationship was discontinued but the positions were novated and reassigned to the Mount Milligan Mine, the Company recognized an unrealized gain of $1.1 million in net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings and comprehensive (loss) income, representing an amount in accumulated other comprehensive income up to the date the hedges were novated.
Foreign exchange contracts
The Company applies hedge accounting to the foreign exchange contracts it enters to hedge a portion of its future Canadian denominated expenditures. The foreign exchange contracts are expected to settle by the end of 2024.
Copper contracts
The Company applies hedge accounting to copper contracts. In the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company extended its copper hedge program by entering zero-cost option collars to hedge approximately 70% of the Mount Milligan Mine’s expected copper sales (net of sales under Royal Gold streaming arrangement) for 2022 and added zero-cost collar positions (net of sales under the Royal Gold streaming arrangement) for 2023 to hedge approximately 35% of this exposure.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 101 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The table below includes the effective portion of changes in the fair value of these derivatives contracts recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and the amounts reclassified to the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Fair value movement of derivative financial instruments | $ | 7,283 | $ | 14,377 | ||||
| Reclassified to net earnings from continuing operations | (29,410 | ) | 2,906 | |||||
| Reclassified to net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations | 17,325 | (5,770 | ) | |||||
| (Loss) income included in OCI(1) | $ | (4,802 | ) | $ | 11,513 | |||
| (1) | Includes tax recovery of $1.8 million (December 31, 2020 - expense of $4.3 million). |
Non-hedge derivatives
All derivative instruments not designated in a hedge relationship are classified as financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss, including the gold and copper forward contracts for gold ounces and copper pounds payable to Royal Gold and foreign exchange contracts that were entered into before April 1, 2020. Changes in fair value of non-hedge derivatives at each reporting date are included in the consolidated statements of (loss) earnings as non- hedge derivative gains or losses, with the exception of spot and forward contracts associated with the Royal Gold deliverables, which are included in revenue. As at December 31, 2021 and 2020, all foreign exchange contracts that were entered into before April 1, 2020 were settled.
For the Royal Gold deliverables, the Company delivers physical gold and copper warrants to Royal Gold based on a percentage of the gold ounces and copper pounds included in each final sale of concentrate to third party customers, including offtakers and traders (“MTM Customers”) within two days of receiving a final payment. If the final payment from a MTM Customer is not received within five months of the provisional payment date, then the Company will deliver an estimated amount of gold ounces and copper warrants based on information that is available from the MTM Customer at that time.
The Company receives payment from MTM Customers in cash, thus requiring the purchase of physical gold and copper warrants in order to satisfy the obligation to pay Royal Gold. In order to hedge its gold and copper price risk that arises when physical purchase and concentrate sales pricing periods do not match, the Company has entered into certain forward gold and copper purchase and sales contracts pursuant to which it purchases gold and copper at an average price during a quotational period and sells gold and copper at a spot price. These contracts are treated as derivatives, not designated as hedging instruments. The Company records its forward commodity contracts at fair value using a market approach based on observable quoted market prices.
The non-hedge derivative instruments outstanding as at December 31, 2021 are expected to settle by the end of 2022. The non-hedge derivative instruments outstanding as at December 31, 2021 are summarized as follows:
| Instrument | Unit | Type | Total Position | |||||||||
| Royal Gold deliverables | ||||||||||||
| Gold forward contracts | Ounces | Float | 16,410 | |||||||||
| Copper forward contracts | Pounds | Float | 1,748,000 | |||||||||
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 102 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The following table is a sensitivity analysis of what the fair value would be due to an increase or a decrease of 10% in the price of all derivative instruments outstanding as at December 31, 2021:
| Fair value | Fair value after | Fair value after | ||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | increase of 10% | decrease of 10% | ||||||||||
| Royal Gold deliverables | $ | 589 | $ | 4,359 | $ | (3,181 | ) | |||||
| Copper contracts | $ | (1,776 | ) | $ | (16,275 | ) | $ | 10,550 | ||||
| Fuel contracts | $ | 4,215 | $ | 5,874 | $ | 2,563 | ||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 7,252 | $ | 61,824 | $ | (33,169 | ) | |||||
| b. | Provisionally-priced contracts |
Certain gold-copper concentrate sales contracts contain an embedded derivative and are marked to market at the end of each reporting period. As at December 31, 2021, the Company’s trade receivables with embedded derivatives had a fair value of $28.1 million (December 31, 2020 - $12.4 million), representing a mark-to-market adjustment on 12.1 million pounds of copper and 77,164 ounces of gold (December 31, 2020 - 13.8 million pounds of copper and 25,672 ounces of gold).
| c. | Fair value measurement |
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. All financial instruments for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements are categorized within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
Level 1: observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2: inputs, other than the quoted market prices in active markets, which are observable, either directly and/ or indirectly; and
Level 3: unobservable inputs for the asset or liability in which little or no market data exists, which therefore require an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
For items that are recognized at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by reassessing their classification at the end of each reporting period. During the year ended December 31, 2021, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and no transfers into or out of Level 3 fair value measurements.
The fair values of cash, amounts receivable that are not provisionally priced, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the short term to maturity of these financial instruments.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 103 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
The levels in the fair value hierarchy into which the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized on the consolidated statements of financial position at fair value on a recurring basis were categorized as follows:
December 31, 2021
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Provisionally-priced receivables | $ | — | $ | 28,068 | $ | — | $ | 28,068 | ||||||||
| Marketable securities | 2,171 | — | — | 2,171 | ||||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | — | 14,230 | — | 14,230 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 2,171 | $ | 42,298 | $ | — | $ | 44,469 | |||||||||
| Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | $ | — | $ | 3,949 | $ | — | $ | 3,949 | ||||||||
| Share-based compensation liability | 11,444 | — | — | 11,444 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 11,444 | $ | 3,949 | $ | — | $ | 15,393 | |||||||||
December 31, 2020
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Provisionally-priced receivables | $ | — | $ | 12,415 | $ | — | $ | 12,415 | ||||||||
| Marketable securities | 3,845 | — | — | 3,845 | ||||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | — | 28,497 | — | 28,497 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 3,845 | $ | 40,912 | $ | — | $ | 44,757 | |||||||||
| Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | $ | — | $ | 12,679 | $ | — | $ | 12,679 | ||||||||
| Share-based compensation liability | 28,184 | — | — | 28,184 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 28,184 | $ | 12,679 | $ | — | $ | 40,863 | |||||||||
Valuation Techniques
Marketable securities
Marketable securities representing shares of publicly traded entities are recorded at fair value using quoted market prices (classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy).
Provisionally-priced receivables
The fair value of receivables arising from copper and gold sales contracts that contain provisional pricing mechanisms are determined using the appropriate quoted forward price from the exchange that is the principal active market for the particular metal. As such, these receivables, which meet the definition of an embedded derivative are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 104 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Derivative financial instruments
The fair value of gold, copper, diesel and currency derivative financial instruments, classified within Level 2, are determined using derivative pricing models that utilize a variety of inputs that are a combination of quoted prices and market-corroborated inputs. The fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts includes an adjustment for credit risk.
Share-based compensation liability
Share-based compensation liability representing PSUs, DSUs and a portion of RSUs is recorded at fair value using the Company’s quoted price or the Company’s quoted price in relation to quoted price of TRIV.
| 28. | Capital and financial risk management |
The Company is exposed in varying degrees to certain financial risks by virtue of its activities. The overall financial risk management program focuses on preservation of capital and protecting current and future Company assets and cash flows by reducing exposure to risks posed by the uncertainties and volatilities of financial markets. The Company manages its financial risks in accordance with the financial risk management policy approved by the Company’s Audit Committee.
The Company is exposed to the following types of risk and manages them as follows:
| a. | Capital risk |
The Company’s primary objective with respect to its capital management is to provide returns for shareholders by ensuring that it has sufficient cash resources to maintain its ongoing operations, pursue and support growth opportunities, continue the development and exploration of its mineral properties and satisfy debt repayment requirements and other obligations. The Company’s capital structure consists of lease obligations and equity with the Company’s Corporate Facility available to be drawn upon.
The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in its economic and operating environment and the risk characteristics of the Company’s assets. For effective capital management, the Company implemented planning, budgeting and forecasting processes to help determine the funds required to ensure the Company has the appropriate liquidity to meet its operating and growth objectives. The Company ensures that there is access to sufficient funds to meet its short-term business, operating and financing requirements, taking into account its anticipated cash flows from operations and its holdings of cash and cash equivalents.
| b. | Foreign currency risk |
The Company’s operations are located in various geographic locations, exposing the Company to potential foreign exchange risk in its financial position and cash flows. As the Company operates in an international environment, some of the Company’s financial instruments and transactions are denominated in currencies other than the US dollar, primarily including the Canadian dollar and Turkish lira. The operating results and financial position of the Company are reported in US dollar in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The fluctuation of the US dollar in relation to other currencies will consequently have an impact on the results of the Company and may also affect the value of the Company’s assets and liabilities.
The Company utilizes hedging strategies to minimize exposure to the Canadian dollar which includes (but is not limited to) the use of purchased puts, sold calls, collars and forward instruments. The Company does not currently hedge the exposure to the Turkish lira. Based on Canadian dollar denominated assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2021, 10% strengthening of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar and 10% weakening of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would have resulted in a $1.9 million gain and a $0.8 million loss, respectively, net of the impact of hedging strategies.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 105 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| c. | Interest rate risk |
Interest rate risk is the risk borne by an interest-bearing asset or liability as a result of fluctuations in interest rates. Financial assets and financial liabilities with variable interest rates expose the Company to risk of changes in cash flows. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments that earn interest at market rates. As at December 31, 2021, the majority of the cash and cash equivalents were comprised of interest-bearing assets. Based on amounts as at December 31, 2021, a 1% change in interest rates would result in a $9.5 million change to interest income.
No amounts were drawn from the Company’s Corporate Facility as at December 31, 2021.
| d. | Commodity price risk |
The profitability of the Company’s operations and value of its mineral resource properties is affected by changes in the current and expected future prices of gold and copper. Changes in the price of certain raw materials can also significantly affect the Company’s cash flows.
Gold and copper prices historically have fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous factors outside of the Company's control, including but not limited to, industrial, residential and retail demand, forward sales by producers and speculators, levels of worldwide production, short-term changes in supply and demand due to speculative or hedging activities, macro-economic variables, geopolitical events and certain other factors related specifically to gold, including central bank reserves management.
To the extent that the price of gold and copper increase over time, the fair value of the Company’s mineral assets increase, and cash flows will improve; conversely, declines in the prices of gold and copper will reduce the fair value of mineral assets and cash flows. A protracted period of depressed prices could impair the Company’s operations and development opportunities, and significantly erode shareholder value. To the extent there are adverse changes to the price of certain raw materials (e.g., diesel fuel), the Company’s profitability and cash flows may be impacted. The Company enters into hedge contracts to mitigate price risk for both gold and copper price movements on the Royal Gold stream, copper contracts to secure the copper price for a majority of Mount Milligan Mine’s sales not subject to the Royal Gold stream, and fuel hedge contracts to mitigate commodity price risk.
Based on amounts for the year ended December 31, 2021, net of the impact of hedging instruments, a 10% increase in gold prices would have an impact of a $39.2 million on net loss before tax and a 10% decrease in gold prices would have an impact of a $41.4 million on net loss before tax. Similarly, net of the impact of hedging instruments, a 10% increase and 10% decrease in copper prices would have an impact of $2.4 million on earnings before income tax.
| e. | Credit risk |
Credit risk is the risk of a financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligation. Credit risk arises principally from the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, receivables from customers, and certain derivative instruments.
The Company holds its cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions resulting in a low level of credit risk. The Company manages its cash holdings amongst these eligible counterparties based on assigned limits to these groups and evaluates the cash balances on a monthly basis to ensure compliance within these limits. For trade receivables and derivative financial instruments, historical levels of default have been negligible, resulting in a low level of credit risk. The Company mitigates credit risk by dealing with recognized creditworthy counterparties and limiting concentration risk. For derivative financial instrument liabilities, the Company assumes no credit risk when the fair value of an instrument is negative. The Company also manages counterparty risk through maintaining diversification limits for its eligible counterparties.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 106 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
| f. | Liquidity risk |
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company finances its operations through a combination of operating cash flows, debt and, from time to time, through the issuance of equity. The Company primarily uses funds generated from operating activities to fund operational expenses, sustaining and development capital spending, and interest and principal payments on its portfolio of leases and dividend distributions. The Company continuously monitors and reviews its actual and forecasted cash flows and manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash and cash equivalents, by utilizing debt, if necessary, and by monitoring developments in the capital markets. Contractual maturities relating to lease obligations are set out in note 16 and contractual maturities relating to derivative instruments are set out in note 27. Other financial liabilities have maturities within one year of December 31, 2021.
As at December 31, 2021, the Company has available total liquidity of $1,347.2 million (December 31, 2020 - $945.2 million), comprising cash of $947.2 million (2020 - $545.2 million) and the undrawn Corporate Facility of $400.0 million (2020 - $400.0 million).
The Company believes its cash on hand, available cash from the Company’s Corporate Facility, and cash flow from the Company’s operations will be sufficient to fund its anticipated operating cash requirements and development expenditures through at least the end of 2022.
| 29. | Segmented information |
The Company bases its operating segments on the way information is reported and used by the Company's chief operating decision-maker (“CODM”). The results of operating segments are reviewed by the CODM in order to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their respective performances.
The results of mine sites or business units that have been discontinued or the Company does not operate or does not control, or for which a disposal plan has been initiated, are not reviewed on a prospective basis as they are not important for the future allocation of resources. In the second quarter of 2021, the Kumtor Mine was reclassified as a discontinued operation and consequently is no longer being reviewed by the CODM. The results of the Kumtor Mine are presented as part of net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations in the current and comparative periods.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 107 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Geographical Information
The following table details the Company’s revenue by geographic area(1) and information about the Company’s non- current assets by location of the assets.
| Revenue | Non-current assets | |||||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, | As at December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Kyrgyz Republic | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 611,050 | ||||||||
| Turkey | 199,440 | 186,512 | 200,048 | 221,715 | ||||||||||||
| United States | 194,765 | 140,756 | 71,634 | 81,681 | ||||||||||||
| Canada | 505,936 | 393,994 | 1,125,604 | 840,914 | ||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | 8,189 | 7,808 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 900,141 | $ | 721,262 | $ | 1,405,475 | $ | 1,763,168 | ||||||||
| (1) | Presented based on the location from which the product originated. |
Operating segments
The following tables set forth operating results by reportable segment for the following years:
Year ended December 31, 2021
| Mount | Total | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Öksüt | Milligan | Molybdenum | Segments | and other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 199,440 | $ | 505,936 | $ | 194,765 | $ | 900,141 | $ | — | $ | 900,141 | ||||||||||||
| Cost of sales | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production costs | 51,137 | 256,810 | 179,729 | 487,676 | 487,676 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 30,235 | 83,910 | 6,360 | 120,505 | 120,505 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from mine operations | $ | 118,068 | $ | 165,216 | $ | 8,676 | $ | 291,960 | $ | — | $ | 291,960 | ||||||||||||
| Exploration and development costs | 1,486 | 5,590 | — | 7,076 | 19,006 | 26,082 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate administration | — | — | — | — | 27,134 | 27,134 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Care and maintenance | — | — | 14,592 | 14,592 | 14,131 | 28,723 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Impairment reversal | — | (160,000 | ) | (160,000 | ) | — | (160,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Reclamation expense | — | 135 | 23,212 | 23,347 | — | 23,347 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other operating expenses | 195 | 10,316 | 2,248 | 12,759 | — | 12,759 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings (loss) from operations | $ | 116,387 | $ | 309,175 | $ | (31,376 | ) | $ | 394,186 | $ | 333,915 | |||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of Greenstone Partnership | (97,274 | ) | (97,274 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other non-operating expenses | 23,493 | 23,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finance costs | 4,762 | 4,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings before income tax | $ | 402,934 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax recovery | (44,015 | ) | (44,015 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operation | 446,949 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss from discontinued operations | (828,717 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (381,768 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment(1) | $ | 24,898 | $ | 83,704 | $ | 2,506 | $ | 111,108 | $ | 7,828 | $ | 118,936 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes additions to property, plant and equipment related to discontinued operations of $95.7 million. |
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 108 |
Centerra Gold Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2021
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amount, unless otherwise indicated)
Year ended December 31, 2020
| Mount | Total | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Öksüt | Milligan | Molybdenum | Segments | and other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 186,512 | $ | 393,994 | $ | 140,756 | $ | 721,262 | $ | — | $ | 721,262 | ||||||||||||
| Cost of sales | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production costs | 35,232 | 219,840 | 154,895 | 409,967 | 409,967 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 15,971 | 73,073 | 6,766 | 95,810 | 95,810 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings (loss) from mine operations | $ | 135,309 | $ | 101,081 | $ | (20,905 | ) | $ | 215,485 | $ | — | $ | 215,485 | |||||||||||
| Exploration and development costs | 1,676 | 7,498 | 11 | 9,185 | 22,352 | 31,537 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate administration | — | — | — | — | 45,674 | 45,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Care and maintenance | — | — | 12,924 | 12,924 | 16,193 | 29,117 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Reclamation expenses | — | — | 53,381 | 53,381 | — | 53,381 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other operating expenses | 75 | 9,701 | 2,086 | 11,862 | — | 11,862 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings (loss) from operations | $ | 133,558 | $ | 83,882 | $ | (89,307 | ) | $ | 128,133 | $ | 43,914 | |||||||||||||
| Other non-operating expenses | 6,247 | 6,247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finance costs | 13,818 | 13,818 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss before income tax | $ | 23,849 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 7,709 | 7,709 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings from continuing operations | 16,140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings from discontinued operations | 392,398 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 408,538 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment(1) | $ | 69,301 | $ | 38,100 | $ | 6,498 | $ | 113,899 | $ | 26,829 | $ | 140,728 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes additions to property, plant and equipment related to discontinued operations of $258.4 million. |
| 30. | Subsequent events |
On February 22, 2022, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement to acquire Gemfield Resources LLC, owner of Goldfield Project in Nevada, USA, from Waterton Nevada Splitter, LLC. The total consideration for this transaction is comprised of approximately $175.0 million in cash at closing and a $31.5 million deferred milestone payment. The deferred milestone payment is payable in cash or common shares of the Company, at Centerra’s option, the earlier of 18 months following the acquisition date and a construction decision with respect to the project, among other things.
| Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021 | 109 |
CORPORATE
INFORMATION
DIRECTORS (1)
Michael S. Parrett Chair
Bruce V. Walter Vice-Chair
Richard W. Connor
Wendy Kei
Jacques Perron
Scott G. Perry
Sheryl K. Pressler
Paul N. Wright
Susan L. Yurkovich
1) As of July 2022. |
OFFICERS (1)
Scott G. Perry President and Chief Executive Officer
Darren J. Millman Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Claudia D’Orazio Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Dennis C. Kwong Vice President, Business Development and Exploration
Yousef Rehman Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
1) As of July 2022. |
MANAGEMENT (1)
Cathy Taylor Vice President, Risk and Insurance
Malcolm Stallman Vice President, Exploration
Oliver Curran Vice President, Environment and Social Performance
Cam Duquette Vice President, Health, Safety and Security
Carole Fortin General Manager, Mount Milligan Mine
José Nacif-Drah Vice President, Global Information Technology
Ryan Snyder Vice President, Finance
David A. Bickford Vice President, Operations, Turkey
Tom Ondrejko Vice President, US Molybdenum Operations
1) As of July 2022. |
TRANSFER AGENT
For information on common share holdings, lost shares and address changes, contact:
TSX Trust Company P.O. Box 700 Station B Montreal, QC Canada H3B 3K3
North America phone Fax: 1.888.249.6189
shareholderinquiries@tmx.com | AUDITORS
KPMG LLP Bay Adelaide Centre 333 Bay Street Suite 4600 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 2S5 | STOCK EXCHANGE
Toronto Stock Exchange Symbol: CG
NYSE Symbol: CGAU
INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACT
Toby Caron Director, Treasurer & Investor Relations
Shae Frosst Manager, Investor Relations investor@centerragold.com
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
Suite 1500 1 University Avenue Toronto, Ontario Canada M5J 2P1
T 416.204.1953 F 416.204.1954
www.centerragold.com |
Printed in Canada
Centerra Gold Inc. Annual Report 2021
CENTERRA GOLD INC.
Suite 1500
1 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5J 2P1
T 416.204.1953
F 416.204.1954
www.centerragold.com