8-K
Crescent Energy Co false 0001866175 0001866175 2022-02-07 2022-02-07

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 8-K

 

 

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 7, 2022

 

 

Crescent Energy Company

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   001-41132   87-1133610

(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)

 

(Commission

File Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

 

600 Travis Street, Suite 7200

Houston, Texas

  77002
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

(713) 337-4600

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

Pre-commencement communication pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

Pre-commencement communication pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Trading

Symbol(s)

 

Name of each exchange

on which registered

Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share   CRGY   The New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§ 230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§ 240.12b-2 of this chapter).

Emerging growth company  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

 

 

 


Item 2.02.

Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

On February 7, 2022, in connection with the Notes Offering (as defined below), Crescent Energy Company (NYSE: CRGY) (“CRGY” or “our,” “us,” or “we”) provided certain updated disclosures to potential investors, the relevant excerpts of which are set forth below.

Preliminary Production Data for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2021

As of the date of this current report, we have not finalized our financial and operational results for the three months or the year ended December 31, 2021. However, based on preliminary information, we estimate that our December production ranged from 112 to 118 MBoe/d including Contango (as defined below) production after the close of the Merger Transactions (as defined below) on December 7, 2021.

This preliminary estimate is derived from our internal records and is based on the most current information available to management as to the outcome and timing of future events, including current planned capital expenditures, drilling activity, commodity prices and well results, as well as current expected unit costs for 2022. This preliminary estimate has not been audited or reviewed by our independent auditors nor have our independent auditors performed any procedures with respect to this information or expressed any opinion or any form of assurance on such information. This preliminary estimate is preliminary, unaudited and inherently uncertain. Our normal reporting processes with respect to the foregoing preliminary estimate have not been fully completed and our auditors have not completed an audit or review of such estimate. During the course of our and our auditors’ review on this preliminary estimate, we could identify items that would require us to make adjustments and which could affect our final results. Any such adjustments could be material. This preliminary estimate should not be viewed as indicative of our financial condition or results as of or for any future period. Actual results could differ from the estimates, trends and expectations discussed herein, and such differences could be material.

In addition, the information contained in Item 8.01 of this Current Report is incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.

The information in this Item 2.02 shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.

 

Item 7.01.

Regulation FD Disclosure.

On February 7, 2022, Crescent Energy Finance LLC (“CE Finance”), a subsidiary of CRGY, issued a news release announcing that, subject to market conditions, CE Finance intends to offer (the “Notes Offering”) for sale in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act, to eligible purchasers $150 million aggregate principal amount of 7.250% Senior Notes due 2026. A copy of the news release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.

In addition, the information contained in Item 2.02 and Item 8.01 of this Current Report is incorporated into this Item 7.01 by reference.

The information contained in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act.

 

2


Item 8.01

Other Events.

On February 7, 2022, in connection with the Notes Offering (as defined below), CRGY provided certain updated disclosures to potential investors, the relevant excerpts of which are set forth below.

******

Our proved developed producing (“PDP”) reserves as of December 31, 2021 have estimated average five-year and ten-year annual decline rates of approximately 11% and 10%, respectively, and an estimated 2022 PDP decline rate of 17%, based on production type curves used in our reserve reports. As a result of this low decline profile, we require relatively minimal capital expenditures to maintain our production and cash flows. Our properties located in the Eagle Ford, Barnett and the Rockies represent approximately 78% of our PD reserves as of December 31, 2021 and provide us with diversification from both a regional location and commodity price perspective, which provides us certain downside protection as it relates to commodity-specific pressures, isolated infrastructure constraints or severe weather events. The table below illustrates the aggregate leasehold acreage positions, reserve volumes and weighted average decline profiles associated with our proved assets as of December 31, 2021 and our pro forma production for the nine months ended September 30, 2021.

 

Operating Area

   Net Acreage      Net
Proved
Reserves
     % Oil &
Liquids
    Net PD
Reserves
     Weighted Average
Annual PDP Decline(1)
    Net
Proved
PV

($MM)(2)
     Net PD
PV

($MM)(2)
     9 Months
Ended
9/30/21 PF
Production
 
   (in thousands)      (MMBoe)     

 

    (MMBoe)      Five Year     Ten Year     PV-10      PV-10      (MBoe/d)  

Eagle Ford

     143        136        79     84        13     11     1,954        1,306        28  

Rockies(3)

     243        147        52     143        10     10     1,319        1,250        35  

Barnett

     133        129        16     129        6     6     605        605        23  

Permian

     107        54        69     37        15     12     594        458        10  

Mid Con

     365        40        67     40        11     10     413        411        12  

Other(4)

     37        25        71     25        17     12     274        274        8  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     1,029        532        54     459        11     10     5,159        4,305        115  

 

(1)

Reflects the estimated average annual decline rates of our PDP reserves as of December 31, 2021 for the five-year period ending January 31, 2027 and the ten-year period ending January 31, 2032 in each case based on the production type curves used in estimating our proved reserves.

(2)

Reflects the net proved and net PD present values reflected in our proved reserve estimates as of January 1, 2022. PV-10 is not a financial measure prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Neither PV-10 or standardized measure represent an estimate of the fair market value of our oil and natural gas properties. We believe that the presentation of PV-10 is relevant and useful to our investors as supplemental disclosure to the standardized measure of future net cash flows, or after tax amount, because it presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our reserves prior to taking into account future income taxes and our current tax structure. We and others in the industry use PV-10 as measures to compare the relative size and value of proved reserves held by companies without regard to the specific tax characteristics of such entities. Investors should be cautioned that none of PV-10 and standardized measure represent an estimate of the fair market value of our proved reserves.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our PV-0 and PV-10 to the GAAP financial measure of Standardized Measure.

 

     SEC Pricing  
   As of December 31, 2021  

PV-10 of proved reserves

   $ 5,158,824  

Impact removal of 10% discount rate

     4,232,083  

PV-0

     9,390,907  

Future income taxes

     (352,136

Future net cash flows

     9,038,771  

Impact of 10% discount rate

     (4,080,471

Standardized Measure

   $ 4,958,300  

 

(3)

We have a contractual right to participate in 28,768 net acres in the DJ basin through an agreement with a large operator and will be entitled to receive our proportionate share of acreage in the future based on our participation in proposed wells.

(4)

Includes working interest properties located in California as well as diversified minerals.

******

 

3


We had leasehold interests in an aggregate 1,029 thousand net acres as of December 31, 2021, on 898 thousand of which we were designated as operator.

******

As of December 31, 2021, we owned mineral and royalty interests in 174 thousand gross acres and an overriding royalty interest in 117 thousand gross acres, both operated by large, well-capitalized oil and natural gas companies located primarily in the Eagle Ford, Marcellus, Utica and the Rockies. These interests entitle us to receive an average 5.4% royalty and 0.7% overriding royalty interest on all production from such acreage with no additional future capital or operating costs required.

******

The below table describes the net acreage, net PDP wells and proved reserve amounts for each of our geographic areas as of December 31, 2021:

 

Geographic Area

   Net Acreage      Net PDP Wells      Proved Reserves  
     (in thousands)             (MBoe)  

Eagle Ford Shale

     143        666        136,175  

Barnett Shale

     133        899        129,354  

Mid Con

     365        1,372        40,146  

Rockies(1)

     243        1,239        146,584  

Permian Basin

     107        1,112        54,056  

Other Basins(2)

     37        609        25,330  

 

(1)

We have a contractual right to participate in 28,768 net acres in the DJ basin through an agreement with a large operator and will be entitled to receive our proportionate share of acreage in the future based on our participation in proposed wells.

(2)

Includes working interest properties located in California as well as diversified minerals.

Oil, natural gas and NGL data

The following table summarizes our estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2021 based on an evaluation prepared in accordance with SEC Pricing, including the provisions of the SEC rule regarding reserve estimation regarding a historical 12 month pricing average applied prospectively.

 

     As of December 31, 2021(1)  

Net Proved Reserves:

  

Oil (MBbls)

     210,160  

Natural gas (MMcf)

     1,469,953  

NGLs (MBbls)

     76,493  

Total Proved Reserves (MBoe)

     531,645  

Standardized Measure (thousands)(2)

     4,958,300  

PV-0 (thousands)(2)

   $ 9,390,907  

PV-10 (thousands)(2)

   $ 5,158,824  

Net Proved Developed Reserves:

  

Oil (MBbls)

     158,091  

Natural gas (MMcf)

     1,404,570  

NGLs (MBbls)

     66,402  

Total Proved Developed Reserves (MBoe)

     458,587  

PV-0 (thousands)(2)

   $ 7,494,842  

PV-10 (thousands)(2)

   $ 4,304,510  

Net Proved Undeveloped Reserves:

  

Oil (MBbls)

     52,069  

Natural gas (MMcf)

     65,383  

NGLs (MBbls)

     10,091  

Total Proved Undeveloped Reserves (MBoe)

     73,057  

PV-0 (thousands)(2)

   $ 1,896,065  

PV-10 (thousands)(2)

   $ 854,314  

 

4


 

(1)

Our reserves and present values were determined using average first-day-of-the-month prices for the prior 12 months in accordance with SEC guidance. For oil and NGL volumes, the average WTI posted price of $66.56 per barrel as of December 31, 2021, was adjusted for items such as gravity, quality, local conditions, gathering, transportation fees and distance from market. For natural gas volumes, the average Henry Hub spot price of $3.60 per MMBtu as of December 31, 2021, was similarly adjusted for items such as quality, local conditions, gathering, transportation fees and distance from market. All prices are held constant throughout the lives of the properties. The average adjusted product prices weighted by production over the remaining lives of the properties are $64.84 per barrel of oil, $3.46 per Mcf of natural gas and $27.21 per barrel of NGLs.

(2)

PV-0 and PV-10 are not financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP because they do not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. Our standardized measure includes future obligations under the Texas gross margin tax, but it does not include future federal income tax expenses because, due to the status of CE Finance (as defined below) as a flow through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it is not subject to federal income taxes, and accordingly the Standardized Measure of estimated future cash flows attributable to CE Finance does not differ materially from the associated PV-10. None of PV-0, PV-10 or standardized measure represents an estimate of the fair market value of our oil and natural gas properties. We believe that the presentation of PV-0 and PV-10 is relevant and useful to our investors because it presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our reserves prior to taking into account future income taxes and our current tax structure. We and others in the industry use PV-0 and PV-10 as measures to compare the relative size and value of proved reserves held by companies without regard to the specific tax characteristics of such entities.

******

As of December 31, 2021, our aggregate PUD reserves were composed of 52,069 MBbls of oil, 65,383 MMcf of natural gas and 10,091 MBbls of NGLs, for a total of 73,057 MBoe. PUDs will be converted from undeveloped to developed as the applicable wells have been drilled or completed and have minimal capital remaining to bring the well onto production.

The following table summarizes our changes in PUDs for the year ended December 31, 2021 (in MBoe):

 

Balance, December 31, 2020

     98,579  
  

 

 

 

Purchases of reserves in place

     1,427  

Extensions and discoveries

     8,588  

Revisions of previous estimates

     (21,115

Sales of reserves in place

     (3,190

Transfers to proved developed

     (11,232
  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2021

     73,057  

Purchases of reserves in place of 1,427 during the year ended December 31, 2021 primarily relate to PUD locations added as part of the Merger Transactions. Revisions of previous estimates during the year ended December 31, 2021 were due to the removal of certain locations that are no longer part of our five-year consolidated development plan following the Merger Transactions. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2021, we spent $86 million to convert 11,232 MBoe to developed reserves.

******

 

5


The following table provides a summary of our gross and net operated and non-operated drilling locations by area as of December 31, 2021:

 

     Gross Identified Drilling Locations(1)(2)                
     Operated      Non-Operated      Total WI      Minerals  
     Gross      Net      Gross      Net      Gross      Net      Gross      Net(3)  

By Area

                       

Eagle Ford Shale(4)

                       

Total Locations

     270.0        258.6        620.0        134.8        890.0        393.4        1,249.0        8.7  

Barnett Shale(5)

                       

Total Locations

     40.0        24.3        —          —          40.0        24.3        —          —    

Mid Con(6)

                       

Total Locations

     1.0        0.9        —          —          1.0        0.9        —          —    

Rockies(7)

                       

Total Locations

     99.0        73.0        167.0        66.0        266.0        139.0        498.0        6.3  

Permian Basin(8)

                       

Total Locations

     152.0        87.7        174.0        34.8        326.0        122.5        —          —    

Other Basins(9)

                       

Total Locations

     5.0        4.7        —          —          5.0        4.7        2,550.0        20.6  

 

(1)

Locations as of December 31, 2021 have not been updated to reflect events subsequent to December 31, 2021.

(2)

We estimate that the significant majority of our identified drilling locations are economic at oil and natural gas prices of $60/Bbl oil and $3.00/MMBtu gas.

(3)

Net Mineral Locations Defined as Net Royalty Interest Locations.

(4)

Includes 219.0 gross (123.1 net) total PUD locations and assumes average well spacing of 720 feet.

(5)

Assumes well spacing of 500 feet.

(6)

Includes 1.0 gross (0.9 net) total PUD locations.

(7)

Includes 22.0 gross (17.8 net) total PUD locations and assumes average well spacing of 848 feet.

(8)

Includes 88.0 gross (17.6 net) total PUD locations and assumes average well spacing of 887 feet.

(9)

Includes working interest properties located in California as well as diversified minerals.

******

The following table sets forth production, price and cost data with respect to our properties on a historical basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2021.

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2021
 
     (in thousands)  

Net Production:

  

Eagle Ford Shale:

  

Oil (MBbls)

     3,907  

Natural gas (MMcf)

     8,498  

NGLs (MBbls)

     1,382  
  

 

 

 

Total (MBoe)

     6,706  
  

 

 

 

Average daily production (MBoe/d)

     25  

Barnett Shale:

  

Oil (MBbls)

     8  

Natural gas (MMcf)

     30,813  

NGLs (MBbls)

     1,013  
  

 

 

 

Total (MBoe)

     6,157  
  

 

 

 

Average daily production (MBoe/d)

     23  

Total:

  

Oil (MBbls)

     9,866  

Natural gas (MMcf)

     64,925  

NGLs (MBbls)

     4,488  
  

 

 

 

Total (MBoe)

     25,175  
  

 

 

 

Average daily production (MBoe/d)

     92  

 

6


     Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2021
 
     (in thousands)  

Average Realized Prices (before effects of derivatives):

  

Eagle Ford Shale:

  

Oil (per Bbl)

   $ 62.79  

Natural gas (per Mcf)

   $ 3.56  

NGLs (per Bbl)

   $ 29.42  

Barnett Shale:

  

Oil (per Bbl)

   $ 59.73  

Natural gas (per Mcf)

   $ 2.87  

NGLs (per Bbl)

   $ 22.10  

Total:

  

Oil (per Bbl)

   $ 63.63  

Natural gas (per Mcf)

   $ 3.55  

NGLs (per Bbl)

   $ 27.10  

Average Realized Prices (after effects of derivatives):

  

Eagle Ford Shale:

  

Oil (per Bbl)

   $ 52.13  

Natural gas (per Mcf)

   $ 3.27  

NGLs (per Bbl)

   $ 16.56  

Barnett Shale:

  

Oil (per Bbl)

   $ 59.73  

Natural gas (per Mcf)

   $ 2.90  

NGLs (per Bbl)

   $ 18.77  

Total:

  

Oil (per Bbl)

   $ 51.97  

Natural gas (per Mcf)

   $ 3.16  

NGLs (per Bbl)

   $ 17.04  

Average Costs per Boe:

  

Eagle Ford Shale

   $ 18.03  

Barnett Shale

   $ 9.65  

Total

   $ 16.48  

 

(1)

As of the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K, we have not finalized our financial and operational results for the three months ended December 31, 2021. However, based on preliminary information, we estimate that our December 2021 production ranged from 112 MBoe/d to 118 MBoe/d.

******

The following table sets forth information regarding our PDP wells as of December 31, 2021:

 

     As of December 31, 2021      Average
Working Interest
 
     Proved Developed Producing Wells  
     Working Interest Assets  
     Gross      Net  

Combined Total:

        

Natural gas

     3,700        1,645        44

Oil

     8,213        4,252        52
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

     11,913        5,897        50

 

7


     As of December 31, 2021      Average Net
Revenue Interest
 
     Proved Developed Producing Wells  
     Mineral Assets  
     Gross      Net  

Combined Total:

        

Natural gas

     1,384        34        2.48

Oil

     2,207        35        1.58
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

     3,591        69        1.93

Leasehold acreage

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the total developed and undeveloped acreage in which we owned an interest as of December 31, 2021.

 

     Developed Acres      Undeveloped Acres      Total Acres(1)      Royalty Acres(2)  
     Gross      Net      Gross      Net      Gross      Net      Gross      NMA  

Total

     1,969,914        930,154        223,358        98,585        2,193,272        1,028,740        173,593        55,471  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)

We have a contractual right to participate in 28,768 net acres in the DJ basin through an agreement with a large operator and will be entitled to receive our proportionate share of acreage in the future based on our participation in proposed wells.

(2)

Royalty acres excludes our overriding royalty interest in 117,000 gross acres.

Undeveloped acreage expirations

The following table sets forth the number of total net undeveloped acres as of December 31, 2021 that will expire in 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 unless production is established within the spacing units covering the acreage prior to the expiration dates or unless such leasehold rights are extended or renewed.

 

     2022      2023      2024      2025  

Total

     6,960        1        229        320  

******

The table below sets forth the results of our operated drilling activities for the periods indicated. The information should not be considered indicative of future performance, nor should it be assumed that there is necessarily any correlation among the number of productive wells drilled, quantities of reserves found or economic value. Productive wells are those that produce, or are capable of producing, commercial quantities of hydrocarbons, regardless of whether they produce a reasonable rate of return. Dry wells are those that prove to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities to justify completion.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2021  
     Gross      Net  

Operated Development Wells:

     

Productive

     2.0        1.9  

Dry holes

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Development

     2.0        1.9  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Operated Exploratory Wells:

     

Productive

     —          —    

Dry holes

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Exploratory

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Operated Total Wells:

     

Productive

     2.0        1.9  

Dry holes

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     2.0        1.9  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

8


As of December 31, 2021, we were not a party to any long-term drilling rig contracts. The following table provides our wells in progress, as well as the various stages of such progress, at December 31, 2021.

 

Well Status

   Gross      Net  

Drilling

     6.0        5.7  

Waiting on completion

     4.0        3.8  

Being completed, not producing

     9.0        6.7  

* * * * *

In September 2021, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with an unrelated third party to acquire certain operated producing oil and natural gas properties predominantly located in the Central Basin Platform in Texas and New Mexico, with additional properties in the southwestern Permian and Powder River Basins, for a purchase price of $71.3 million. We closed the transaction in December 2021 and funded the purchase with borrowings under our revolving credit facility and cash on hand.

* * * * *

Production volumes sold

The following table presents historical sales volumes for our properties:

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
     2021      2020  

Oil (MBbls)

     9,866        9,390  

Natural gas (MMcf)

     64,925        54,506  

NGLs (MBbls)

     4,488        3,493  

Total (MBoe)

     25,175        21,967  

Daily average (MBoe/d)

     92        80  

The shift in our production volume mix from oil to natural gas and NGLs since 2020 is due to the acquisition of Titan Energy Holdings, LLC (f/k/a Liberty Energy LLC) (the “Titan Acquisition”), which included assets that are slightly more natural gas-weighted than the existing production of our legacy assets.

Total sales volume increased 3,208 MBoe during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The increase is primarily due to the Titan Acquisition, which contributed an additional 6,079 MBoe, and the acquisition of a portfolio of oil and natural gas mineral assets located in the DJ Basin from an unrelated third-party operator for total consideration of $60.8 million (the “DJ Basin Acquisition”), which contributed an additional 233 MBoe. Sales volumes from our existing asset base decreased by 3,104 MBoe as a result of shut-ins at certain of our assets in Texas due to the severe winter storms occurring in February 2021 and the natural decline from our existing asset base that resulted from the reduction in development capital expenditures in 2020 as a response to the low commodity price environment.

******

Results of operations:

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020

Revenues

The following table provides the components of our revenues, our respective average realized prices and net sales volumes for the periods indicated:

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,      $ Change      % Change  
     2021      2020  

Revenues (in thousands):

           

Oil

   $ 627,817      $ 341,808      $ 286,009        84

Natural gas

     230,271        87,113        143,158        164

Natural gas liquids

     121,613        42,415        79,198        187

Midstream and other

     34,017        30,631        3,386        11
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total revenues

   $ 1,013,718      $ 501,967      $ 511,751        102
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

9


     Nine Months Ended September 30,      $ Change      % Change  
     2021      2020  

Average realized prices, before effects of derivative settlements:

           

Oil ($/Bbl)

   $ 63.63      $ 36.40      $ 27.23        75

Natural gas ($/Mcf)

   $ 3.55      $ 1.60      $ 1.95        122

NGLs ($/Bbl)

   $ 27.10      $ 12.14      $ 14.96        123

Total ($/Boe)

   $ 38.92      $ 21.46      $ 17.46        81

Net sales volumes:

           

Oil (MBbls)

     9,866        9,390        476        5

Natural gas (MMcf)

     64,925        54,506        10,419        19

NGLs (MBbls)

     4,488        3,493        995        28

Total (MBoe)

     25,175        21,967        3,208        15

Average daily net sales volumes:

           

Oil (MBbls/d)

     36        34        2        6

Natural gas (MMcf/d)

     238        199        39        20

NGLs (MBbls/d)

     16        13        3        23

Total (MBoe/d)

     92        80        12        15

Oil revenue. Oil revenue increased $286.0 million, or 84%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. This was driven primarily by higher realized oil prices that resulted in an increase of $268.7 million (an increase of 75% per Bbl) and a $17.3 million increase in sales volumes (2 MBbls per day, or 6%). The increase in sales volumes was primarily driven by our Titan Acquisition (1,822 MBbls of the increase) and DJ Basin Acquisition (107 MBbls of the increase), partially offset by the natural decline from our existing assets that resulted from the reduction in development capital expenditures in 2020.

Natural gas revenue. Natural gas revenue increased $143.2 million, or 164%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. This was driven primarily by higher realized natural gas prices that resulted in an increase of $126.5 million (an increase of 122% per Mcf) in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 due in part to the severe winter storms in February 2021, and a $16.7 million increase in sales volumes (39 MMcf per day, or 20%). The increase in sales volumes was primarily driven by our Titan Acquisition (15,898 MMcf of the increase) and our DJ Basin Acquisition (736 MMcf of the increase), partially offset by the natural decline from our existing assets.

NGL revenue. NGL revenue increased $79.2 million, or 187%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. This was driven primarily by higher realized NGL prices which resulted in an increase of $67.1 million (an increase of 123% per Bbl) as well as a $12.1 million increase in sales volumes (3 MBbls per day, or 23%).The increase in sales volumes was primarily driven by our Titan Acquisition (1,608 MBbls of the increase), partially offset by the natural decline from our existing assets.

Midstream and other revenue. Midstream and other revenue increased $3.4 million, or 11%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by additional revenue of $5.4 million from the midstream assets acquired in the Titan Acquisition offset by lower midstream revenue from our other legacy midstream assets.

 

10


Expenses

The following table summarizes our expenses for the periods indicated and includes a presentation on a per Boe basis, as we use this information to evaluate our performance relative to our peers and to identify and measure trends we believe may require additional analysis:

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,      $ Change      % Change  
     2021      2020  

Expenses (in thousands):

           

Operating expense

   $ 424,427      $ 335,234      $ 89,193        27

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     233,122        231,270        1,852        1

Impairment expense

     —          233,957        (233,957      (100 )% 

General and administrative expense

     33,775        10,198        23,577        231

Other operating costs

     263        8,088        (7,825      (97 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total expenses

   $ 691,587      $ 818,747      $ (127,160      (16 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Expenses per Boe:

           

Operating expense

   $ 16.86      $ 15.26      $ 1.60        10

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     9.26        10.53        (1.27      (12 )% 

Impairment expense

     —          10.65        (10.65      (100 )% 

General and administrative expense

     1.34        0.46        0.88        191

Other operating costs

     0.01        0.37        (0.36      (97 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total expenses per Boe

   $ 27.47      $ 37.27      $ (9.80      (26 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Operating expense. Operating expense increased $89.2 million, or 27%, compared to nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by the following factors:

 

  (i)

Lease and asset operating expenses increased $28.9 million, or 17%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. This increase was driven primarily by higher production during the nine months ended September 30, 2021, due in part to the Titan Acquisition, which contributed $16.3 million to the increase, as well as certain costs that are indexed to oil commodity prices, such as CO2 purchase costs related to our CO2 flood asset in Wyoming. These commodity indexed operating expenses move in tandem with oil commodity prices and are partially offset by changes in our price realizations.

 

  (ii)

Gathering, transportation and marketing expense increased $17.3 million, or 15%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2021, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The increase was driven primarily by increased production and higher gathering and processing expenses of $38.6 million associated with the Titan Acquisition, which included assets that have a higher mix of natural gas and NGLs. This increase was offset by $12.0 million of nonrecurring expense incurred during the months ended September 30, 2020, due to the termination of a midstream contract at our Eagle Ford business. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2021, we reached a settlement with a third-party operator to recoup $3.5 million of disputed gathering charges that we had paid in historical periods.

 

  (iii)

Production and other taxes increased $39.5 million, or 97%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2021, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by higher oil and natural gas revenues, which increased the tax base upon which production and other taxes were calculated.

 

  (iv)

Workover expense increased $3.6 million, or 83%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by higher well workover activities.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization. In the nine months ended September 30, 2021, depreciation, depletion and amortization increased $1.9 million, or 1%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by an increase in our total production, offset by a reduction in the rate from our impairment in 2020.

Impairment expense. In the nine months ended September 30, 2020, because of significant declines in crude prices as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we recorded an impairment charge of $234.0 million to oil and natural gas properties.

 

11


General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense increased $23.6 million, or 231%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by an increase in our equity-based compensation $13.8 million due to the mark-to-market impact of our liability classified awards, an increase in recurring general and administrative expenses of $2.1 million due to increased employee headcount, and an increase in legal, accounting, and other nonrecurring and transaction-related costs of $7.7 million.

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,      $ Change      % Change  
     2021      2020  

General and Administrative Expense (in thousands):

           

Recurring general and administrative expense

   $ 8,445      $ 6,367      $ 2,078        33

Nonrecurring transaction expenses

     10,703        3,000        7,703        257

Equity-based compensation

     14,627        831        13,796        1,660
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total expenses

   $ 33,775      $ 10,198      $ 23,577        231
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Other operating costs. Other operating costs included midstream operating expenses, exploration expenses and gain on sale of assets. Other operating costs decreased $7.8 million, or 97%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by the recognition of a $9.4 million gain on sale of assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2021, partially offset by $2.0 million of additional midstream expenses from our Titan Acquisition.

Interest expense. In the nine months ended September 30, 2021, we incurred interest expense of $37.8 million, as compared to $29.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2020, a 28% increase. This increase was primarily driven by the write-off of deferred financing charges associated with our various credit agreements with syndicates of lenders, which were terminated on May 6, 2021, in May 2021 and higher interest rates associated with the issuance of the notes.

Gain (loss) on derivatives

We enter into derivative contracts to manage our exposure to commodity price risks that impact our revenues and interest rate risks on our variable interest rate debt. In June 2021, we settled certain of our outstanding derivative oil commodity contracts associated with calendar years 2022 and 2023 for $198.7 million, using borrowings of $160.0 million from our revolving credit facility and cash on hand. As part of this settlement, we entered into new commodity derivatives at prevailing market prices. The following table presents gain (loss) on derivatives for the periods presented:

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,      $ Change  
     2021      2020  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Gain (loss) on commodity derivatives

   $ (885,006    $ 308,426      $ (1,193,432

Gain (loss) on interest rate derivatives

     (26      (8,646      8,620  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total gain (loss) on derivatives

   $ (885,032    $ 299,780      $ (1,184,812
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDAX (non-GAAP) and Levered Free Cash Flow (non-GAAP)

Adjusted EBITDAX and Levered Free Cash Flow are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures used by our management to assess our operating results.

 

12


The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDAX (non-GAAP) and Levered Free Cash Flow (non-GAAP) to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP:

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,      $ Change      % Change  
     2021      2020  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     (in thousands)         

Net income (loss)

   $ (601,172    $ (46,442    $ (554,730      1194

Adjustments to reconcile to Adjusted EBITDAX:

           

Interest expense

     37,810        29,555        

Realized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives

     7,373        8,670        

Income tax expense

     407        13        

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     233,122        231,270        

Exploration expense

     833        468        

Non-cash (gain) loss on derivatives

     493,698        (142,773      

Impairment of oil and natural gas properties

     —          233,957        

Equity-based compensation expense

     14,054        831        

(Gain) loss on sale of assets

     (9,418      —          

Other (income) expense

     54        (126      

Transaction and nonrecurring expenses (1)

     12,438        15,000        

Early settlement of derivative contracts (2)

     198,688        —          
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

Adjusted EBITDAX (non-GAAP)

   $ 387,887      $ 330,423      $ 57,464        17

Adjustments to reconcile to Levered Free Cash Flow:

           

Interest expense, excluding non-cash deferred financing cost amortization

     (28,460      (26,153      

Realized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives

     (7,373      (8,670      

Current income tax provision

     (407      (13      

Development of oil and natural gas properties

     (107,998      (86,124      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

Levered Free Cash Flow (non-GAAP)

   $ 243,649      $ 209,463      $ 34,186        16
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

(1)

Transaction and nonrecurring expenses of $12.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 were primarily related to legal, consulting and other fees incurred for (i) the redemption by certain of our consolidated subsidiaries of the noncontrolling equity interests held in such subsidiaries by a certain third-party investor in exchange for its proportionate share of the underlying oil and natural gas interests held directly or indirectly by such subsidiaries, (ii) the redemption by certain of our consolidated subsidiaries of the noncontrolling equity interests held in such subsidiaries by certain third-party investors in exchange for our membership interests in April 2021 and (iii) the series of transactions (the “Merger Transactions”) consummated pursuant to that certain Transaction Agreement, dated June 7, 2021, providing for the combination of the business of Contango Oil & Gas Company (“Contango”) with the business of Independence Energy LLC under CRGY, as if they had occurred on October 1, 2021. Transaction and nonrecurring expenses of $15.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 included (i) $3.0 million for the formation of Independence, the Titan Acquisition and the related reorganization transactions and (ii) $12.0 million for the termination of a midstream contract at our Eagle Ford business.

(2)

Represents the settlement in June 2021 of certain outstanding derivative oil commodity contracts for open positions associated with calendar years 2022 and 2023. Subsequent to the settlement, we entered into new commodity derivative contracts at prevailing market prices. Adjusted EBITDAX increased by $57.5 million, or 17%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2021, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by higher revenue associated with our oil, natural gas and NGL production as a result of increased (i) realized prices and (ii) sales volume driven by the Titan Acquisition. This increase was partially offset by a corresponding increase in operating costs due to higher production volume, as well as realized losses on our commodity derivatives in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 as compared to realized gains in the nine months ended September 30, 2020. Levered Free Cash Flow increased by $34.2 million, or 16%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, driven primarily by (i) increased Adjusted EBITDAX of $57.5 million, offset by $21.9 million of increased capital expenditures related to 2021 development activities following the increase in commodity prices.

******

Non-GAAP financial measures

This Current Report on Form 8-K includes financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP measures include the following:

 

   

Adjusted EBITDAX; and

 

   

Levered Free Cash Flow.

 

13


These are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures used by our management to assess our operating results and assist us make our investment decisions. We believe that the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures provides investors with greater transparency with respect to our results of operations, as well as liquidity and capital resources, and that these measures are useful for period-to-period comparison of results.

We define Adjusted EBITDAX as net income (loss) before interest expense, realized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives, income tax expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization, exploration expense, non-cash gain (loss) on derivative contracts, impairment of oil and natural gas properties, non-cash equity-based compensation, write-offs of other long-term assets, (gain) loss on sale of assets, other (income) expense, certain noncontrolling interest distributions made by Crescent Energy OpCo LLC (“OpCo”), transaction and nonrecurring expenses and early settlement of derivative contracts. We believe Adjusted EBITDAX is a useful performance measure because it allows for an effective evaluation of our operating performance when compared against our peers, without regard to our financing methods, corporate form or capital structure. We exclude the items listed above from net income (loss) in arriving at Adjusted EBITDAX because these amounts can vary substantially within our industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired. Adjusted EBITDAX should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (loss) as determined in accordance with GAAP, of which such measure is the most comparable GAAP measure. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDAX are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax burden, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets, none of which are reflected in Adjusted EBITDAX. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDAX should not be construed as an inference that our results will be unaffected by unusual or nonrecurring items. Our computations of Adjusted EBITDAX may not be identical to other similarly titled measures of other companies. In addition, our revolving credit facility and the notes include a calculation of Adjusted EBITDAX for purposes of covenant compliance.

We define Levered Free Cash Flow as Adjusted EBITDAX less interest expense, excluding non-cash deferred financing cost amortization, realized gain (loss) on interest rate derivatives, current income tax benefit (provision), tax-related noncontrolling distributions made by OpCo, and development of oil and natural gas properties. Levered Free Cash Flow does not take into account amounts incurred on acquisitions. Levered Free Cash Flow is not a measure of performance as determined by GAAP. Levered Free Cash Flow is a supplemental non-GAAP performance measure that is used by our management and external users of our financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. We believe Levered Free Cash Flow is a useful performance measure because it allows for an effective evaluation of our operating and financial performance and the ability of our operations to generate cash flow that is available to reduce leverage or distribute to our equity holders. Levered Free Cash Flow should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (loss) as determined in accordance with GAAP, of which such measure is the most comparable GAAP measure, or as an indicator of actual operating performance or investing activities. Our computations of Levered Free Cash Flow may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Adjusted EBITDAX and Levered Free Cash Flow should be read in conjunction with the information contained in our combined and consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.

******

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
     2021      2020  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 148,632      $ 297,434  

Net cash used in investing activities

     (126,776      (101,390

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     4,939        (175,685

 

14


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020

Net cash provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 decreased by $148.8 million, or 50%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020 primarily due to cash payments of $198.7 million associated with the early settlement of certain outstanding oil commodity derivative contracts in June 2021. As part of this settlement, we entered into new commodity derivatives at prevailing market prices.

Net cash used in investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 increased by $25.4 million, or 25%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, primarily due to $65.4 million of acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties related to our DJ Basin Acquisition partially offset by $26.4 million of lower cash development capital expenditures and $12.8 million higher proceeds from the sale of assets.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 was $4.9 million, as compared to a $175.7 million use of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2020. This increase was primarily due to net cash inflows as a result of our debt refinancing during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to net long-term debt repayments cash outflow of $161.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

******

The table below presents our capital expenditures and related metrics that it uses to evaluate our business for the periods presented:

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
     2021      2020  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Total development of oil and natural gas properties

   $ 107,998      $ 86,124  

Change in accruals of oil and natural gas properties

     (24,301      23,925  

Cash used in development of oil and natural gas properties

     83,697        110,049  

Cash used in acquisition of oil and natural gas properties

     65,391        —    

Non-cash acquisition of oil and natural gas properties

     7,164        452,383  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total expenditure on acquisition and development of oil and natural gas properties

   $ 156,252      $ 562,432  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Our development of oil and natural gas properties was higher in the first nine months ended September 30, 2021, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. Due to the low commodity price environment experienced throughout 2020 resulting from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the actions from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, we significantly reduced our development capital expenditures starting in the second quarter of 2020 but have resumed development activities in 2021 as commodity prices have recovered. We used cash of $65.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 for the acquisition of oil and natural gas properties, primarily related to our DJ Basin Acquisition, and had a non-cash acquisition of $452.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2020 related to our Titan Acquisition.

* * * * *

This Item 8.01 incorporates by reference the following audit letter and reserve reports by our independent reserve engineers

 

   

the audit letter of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., filed as Exhibit 99.2 herewith;

 

   

the report of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., filed as Exhibit 99.3 herewith;

 

   

the report of Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc., filed as Exhibit 99.4 herewith;

 

   

the report of William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc., filed as Exhibit 99.5 herewith; and

 

   

the report of Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc., filed as Exhibit 99.6 herewith.

 

15


Item 9.01

Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d)    Exhibits.

 

Exhibit

  

Description

23.1    Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
23.2    Consent of Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.
23.3    Consent of William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc.
23.4    Consent of Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc.
99.1    Press Release, dated February 7, 2022.
99.2    Audit Letter of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
99.3    Report of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
99.4    Report of Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.
99.5    Report of William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc.
99.6    Report of Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc.
104    Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

 

16


SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CRGY has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 7, 2022

 

CRESCENT ENERGY COMPANY
By:  

/s/ Bo Shi

Name:   Bo Shi
Title:   General Counsel

 

17

Exhibit 23.1

 

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into or inclusion in (i) this Current Report on Form 8-K (including any amendments or supplements thereto, related appendices, and financial statements) (this “Current Report”), and (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December 10, 2021 of Crescent Energy Company (the “Company”) of our firm’s audit letter dated January 14, 2022 and reserves report dated January 17, 2022, respectively, each prepared for the Company as of December 31, 2021. We hereby further consent to all references to our firm or such letters included in or incorporated by reference into this Current Report.

 

NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
By:  

/s/ Danny D. Simmons, P.E.

  Danny D. Simmons, P.E.
  President and Chief Operating Officer

Houston, Texas

February 7, 2022

Exhibit 23.2

 

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear, and to the references to, and the inclusion of, our reserve report and oil, natural gas and NGL reserves estimates and forecasts of economics as of December 31, 2021, included in or made part of this Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December 10, 2021, of Crescent Energy Company.

 

CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.

 

Texas Registered Engineering Firm

/s/ W. Todd Brooker, P.E.

W. Todd Brooker, P.E.

President

Austin, Texas

February 7, 2022

Exhibit 23.3

WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Worldwide Petroleum Consultants

 

12770 Coit Road, Suite 907      Tel: (972) 385-0354
Dallas, Texas 75251      Fax: (972) 788-5165
     E-Mail: [email protected]

February 4, 2022

Crescent Energy Company

600 Travis Street, Suite 7200

Houston, Texas, 77002

 

Re:    Crescent Energy Company

Gentlemen:

The firm of William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. consents to the use of its name and to the use of its projections for Crescent Energy Company’s Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue (i) included in this Current Report on Form 8-K, and (ii) incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December 10, 2021, of Crescent Energy Company

William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. has no interests in Crescent Energy Company or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Crescent Energy Company. Crescent Energy Company does not employ us on a contingent basis.

 

Sincerely,
WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-84

/s/ Tor Meling

Tor Meling
Senior Vice President

Exhibit 23.4

 

LOGO     

750 N. St. Paul Street

Suite 1750

Dallas, Texas 75201

Phone (214) 754-7090

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to (i) the inclusion of information included in this Current Report on Form 8-K, and (ii) the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December 10, 2021, of Crescent Energy Company with respect to the information from our firm’s reserves reports dated January 31, 2022, prepared for Crescent Energy Company as of December 31, 2021, in reliance upon the reports of this firm and upon the authority of this firm as experts in petroleum engineering.

 

HAAS PETROLEUM ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Texas Registered Engineering Firm

/s/ Michael A. Link, P.E.

Michael A. Link, P.E.
Director

Dallas, Texas

February 4, 2022

Exhibit 99.1

 

LOGO

Crescent Energy Announces Offering of $150 Million Private Placement of Additional 7.250% Senior Notes Due 2026

HOUSTON, TX – (February 7, 2022) – Crescent Energy Company (NYSE: CRGY) (“we” or “our”) announced today that, subject to market conditions, its indirect subsidiary Crescent Energy Finance LLC (the “Issuer”) intends to offer for sale in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to eligible purchasers $150 million aggregate principal amount of 7.250% Senior Notes due 2026 (the “Notes”). The Notes are being offered as additional notes under the indenture (the “Indenture”) pursuant to which the Issuer issued, on May 6, 2021, $500 million aggregate principal amount of 7.250% Senior Notes due 2026 (the “Existing Notes”). The Notes will have substantially identical terms, other than the issue price, the issue date and the first interest payment date, as the Existing Notes, and the Notes and the Existing Notes will be treated as a single class of securities under the Indenture. The Notes mature on May 1, 2026 and pay interest at the rate of 7.250% per year, payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Issuer intends to use the net proceeds from this offering to repay a portion of the amounts outstanding under its revolving credit facility.

The Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act, or any state securities laws, and, unless so registered, the Notes may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. The Issuer plans to offer and sell the Notes only to persons reasonably believed to be qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to persons outside the United States pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act.

This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, the securities described herein, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.

About Crescent Energy Company

Crescent Energy Company is a U.S. independent energy company with a portfolio of assets in basins across the lower 48 states.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This communication contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are based on current expectations. The words and phrases “should”, “could”, “may”, “will”, “believe”, “think”, “plan”, “intend”, “expect”, “potential”, “possible”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “view”, “efforts”, “target”, “goal” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements and express our expectations about future events. This communication includes statements regarding this private placement and the use of proceeds therefrom that may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. We believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions; however, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to be correct. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations, anticipated results or other forward-looking information expressed in this communication, including liquidity and financial market conditions, adverse market conditions, governmental regulations, and the impact of world health events such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this communication that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks


and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Consequently, actual future results could differ materially from our expectations due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those items identified as such in the Final Prospectus, dated November 3, 2021, filed by Crescent Energy Company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Many of such risks, uncertainties and assumptions are beyond our ability to control or predict. Because of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We do not give any assurance (1) that we will achieve our expectations or (2) concerning any result or the timing thereof.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning this offering, the use of proceeds therefrom, Crescent Energy Company and the Issuer or other matters and attributable thereto or to any person acting on their behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. We assume no duty to update or revise their respective forward-looking statements based on new information, future events or otherwise.

Exhibit 99.2

 

LOGO  

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

ROBERT C. BARG

P. SCOTT FROST

JOHN G. HATTNER

JOSEPH J. SPELLMAN

RICHARD B. TALLEY, JR.

 

CHAIRMAN & CEO

C.H. (SCOTT) REES III

 

PRESIDENT & COO

DANNY D. SIMMONS

 

 

January 14, 2022

Mr. Brett Knight

Crescent Energy Company

600 Travis Street, Suite 7200

Houston, Texas 77002

Dear Mr. Knight:

In accordance with your request, we have audited the estimates prepared by Crescent Energy Company (Crescent), as of December 31, 2021, of the proved reserves and future revenue to the Crescent interest in certain oil and gas properties located in the United States. It is our understanding that the proved reserves estimates shown herein constitute approximately 16 percent of all proved reserves owned by Crescent. We have examined the estimates with respect to reserves quantities, reserves categorization, future producing rates, future net revenue, and the present value of such future net revenue, using the definitions set forth in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a). The estimates of reserves and future revenue have been prepared in accordance with the definitions and regulations of the SEC and, with the exception of the exclusion of future income taxes, conform to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas. We completed our audit on or about the date of this letter. This report has been prepared for Crescent’s use in filing with the SEC; in our opinion the assumptions, data, methods, and procedures used in the preparation of this report are appropriate for such purpose.

The following table sets forth Crescent’s estimates of the net reserves and future net revenue, as of December 31, 2021, for the audited properties:

 

     Net Reserves      Future Net Revenue (M$)  

Category

   Oil
(MBBL)
     NGL
(MBBL)
     Gas
(MMCF)
     Total      Present Worth
at 10%
 

Proved Developed Producing

     20,055.8        15,329.4        203,445.7        1,368,963.4        844,472.6  

Proved Developed Non-Producing

     653.2        281.4        2,744.1        29,691.5        18,697.8  

Proved Undeveloped

     5,317.5        4,426.3        30,852.2        258,134.7        111,367.1  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Proved

     26,026.6        20,037.1        237,042.0        1,656,789.7        974,537.5  

Totals may not add because of rounding.

The oil volumes shown include crude oil and condensate. Oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) volumes are expressed in thousands of barrels (MBBL); a barrel is equivalent to 42 United States gallons. Gas volumes are expressed in millions of cubic feet (MMCF) at standard temperature and pressure bases.

When compared on a well-by-well basis, some of the estimates of Crescent are greater and some are less than the estimates of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI). However, in our opinion the estimates shown herein of Crescent’s reserves and future revenue are reasonable when aggregated at the proved level and have been prepared in accordance with the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE Standards). Additionally, these estimates are within the recommended 10 percent tolerance threshold set forth in the SPE Standards. We are satisfied with the methods and procedures used by Crescent in preparing the December 31, 2021, estimates of reserves and future revenue, and we saw nothing of an unusual nature that would cause us to take exception with the estimates, in the aggregate, as prepared by Crescent.

 

 

2100 Ross AVENUE, SUIT 2200 • DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 • PH: 214-969-5401 • FAX: 214-969-5411    [email protected]
1301 MCKINNEY STREET, SUITE 3200 • HOUSTON, TEXAS 77010 • PH: 713-654-4950 •FAX: 713-654-4951    netherlandsewell.com


LOGO

 

Reserves categorization conveys the relative degree of certainty; reserves subcategorization is based on development and production status. The estimates of reserves and future revenue included herein have not been adjusted for risk. Crescent’s estimates do not include probable or possible reserves that may exist for these properties, nor do they include any value for undeveloped acreage beyond those tracts for which undeveloped reserves have been estimated.

Prices used by Crescent are based on the 12-month unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month in the period January through December 2021. For oil and NGL volumes, the average West Texas Intermediate spot price of $66.56 per barrel is adjusted for quality, transportation fees, and market differentials. For gas volumes, the average Henry Hub spot price of $3.598 per MMBTU is adjusted for energy content, transportation fees, and market differentials. All prices are held constant throughout the lives of the properties. The average adjusted product prices weighted by production over the remaining lives of the properties are $63.86 per barrel of oil, $26.03 per barrel of NGL, and $3.634 per MCF of gas.

Operating costs used by Crescent are based on historical operating expense records. These costs include the per-well overhead expenses allowed under joint operating agreements along with estimates of costs to be incurred at and below the district and field levels. However, these overhead expenses have not been included in the confirmation of economic producibility or in the determination of economic limits for the properties. Operating costs have been divided into per-well costs and per-unit-of-production costs. Since all properties are nonoperated, headquarters general and administrative overhead expenses are not included. Capital costs used by Crescent are based on authorizations for expenditure and actual costs from recent activity. Capital costs are included as required for tubing installations, artificial lift installations, new development wells, and production equipment. Abandonment costs used are Crescent’s estimates of the costs to abandon the wells and production facilities, net of any salvage value. Operating, capital, and abandonment costs are not escalated for inflation.

The reserves shown in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as exact quantities. Proved reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of engineering and geoscience data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible; probable and possible reserves are those additional reserves which are sequentially less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. Estimates of reserves may increase or decrease as a result of market conditions, future operations, changes in regulations, or actual reservoir performance. In addition to the primary economic assumptions discussed herein, estimates of Crescent and NSAI are based on certain assumptions including, but not limited to, that the properties will be developed consistent with current development plans as provided to us by Crescent, that the properties will be operated in a prudent manner, that no governmental regulations or controls will be put in place that would impact the ability of the interest owner to recover the reserves, and that projections of future production will prove consistent with actual performance. If the reserves are recovered, the revenues therefrom and the costs related thereto could be more or less than the estimated amounts. Because of governmental policies and uncertainties of supply and demand, the sales rates, prices received for the reserves, and costs incurred in recovering such reserves may vary from assumptions made while preparing these estimates.

It should be understood that our audit does not constitute a complete reserves study of the audited oil and gas properties. Our audit consisted primarily of substantive testing, wherein we conducted a detailed review of all properties. In the conduct of our audit, we have not independently verified the accuracy and completeness of information and data furnished by Crescent with respect to ownership interests, oil and gas production, well test data, historical costs of operation and development, product prices, or any agreements relating to current and future operations of the properties and sales of production. However, if in the course of our examination something came to our attention that brought into question the validity or sufficiency of any such information or data, we did not rely on such information or data until we had satisfactorily resolved our questions relating thereto or had independently verified such information or data. Our audit did not include a review of Crescent’s overall reserves management processes and practices.


LOGO

 

We used standard engineering and geoscience methods, or a combination of methods, including performance analysis and analogy, that we considered to be appropriate and necessary to establish the conclusions set forth herein. As in all aspects of oil and gas evaluation, there are uncertainties inherent in the interpretation of engineering and geoscience data; therefore, our conclusions necessarily represent only informed professional judgment.

Supporting data documenting this audit, along with data provided by Crescent, are on file in our office. The technical person primarily responsible for conducting this audit meets the requirements regarding qualifications, independence, objectivity, and confidentiality set forth in the SPE Standards. Connor B. Riseden, a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, has been practicing consulting petroleum engineering at NSAI since 2006 and has over 4 years of prior industry experience. We are independent petroleum engineers, geologists, geophysicists, and petrophysicists; we do not own an interest in these properties nor are we employed on a contingent basis.

 

Sincerely,

 

NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-2699

By:

 

/s/ C.H. (Scott) Rees III

 

C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

By:

 

/s/ Connor B. Riseden

 

Connor B. Riseden, P.E. 100566

 

Vice President

 

Date Signed: January 14, 2022

LPV:SGZ

Please be advised that the digital document you are viewing is provided by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI) as a convenience to our clients. The digital document is intended to be substantively the same as the original signed document maintained by NSAI. The digital document is subject to the parameters, limitations, and conditions stated in the original document. In the event of any differences between the digital document and the original document, the original document shall control and supersede the digital document.


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

The following definitions are set forth in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a). Also included is supplemental information from (1) the 2018 Petroleum Resources Management System approved by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, (2) the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas, and (3) the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.

(1) Acquisition of properties. Costs incurred to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire a property, including costs of lease bonuses and options to purchase or lease properties, the portion of costs applicable to minerals when land including mineral rights is purchased in fee, brokers’ fees, recording fees, legal costs, and other costs incurred in acquiring properties.

(2) Analogous reservoir. Analogous reservoirs, as used in resources assessments, have similar rock and fluid properties, reservoir conditions (depth, temperature, and pressure) and drive mechanisms, but are typically at a more advanced stage of development than the reservoir of interest and thus may provide concepts to assist in the interpretation of more limited data and estimation of recovery. When used to support proved reserves, an “analogous reservoir” refers to a reservoir that shares the following characteristics with the reservoir of interest:

 

  (i)

Same geological formation (but not necessarily in pressure communication with the reservoir of interest);

 

  (ii)

Same environment of deposition;

 

  (iii)

Similar geological structure; and

 

  (iv)

Same drive mechanism.

Instruction to paragraph (a)(2): Reservoir properties must, in the aggregate, be no more favorable in the analog than in the reservoir of interest.

(3) Bitumen. Bitumen, sometimes referred to as natural bitumen, is petroleum in a solid or semi-solid state in natural deposits with a viscosity greater than 10,000 centipoise measured at original temperature in the deposit and atmospheric pressure, on a gas free basis. In its natural state it usually contains sulfur, metals, and other non-hydrocarbons.

(4) Condensate. Condensate is a mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in the gaseous phase at original reservoir temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, is in the liquid phase at surface pressure and temperature.

(5) Deterministic estimate. The method of estimating reserves or resources is called deterministic when a single value for each parameter (from the geoscience, engineering, or economic data) in the reserves calculation is used in the reserves estimation procedure.

(6) Developed oil and gas reserves. Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

 

  (i)

Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and

 

  (ii)

Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

Supplemental definitions from the 2018 Petroleum Resources Management System:

Developed Producing Reserves – Expected quantities to be recovered from completion intervals that are open and producing at the effective date of the estimate. Improved recovery Reserves are considered producing only after the improved recovery project is in operation.

Developed Non-Producing Reserves – Shut-in and behind-pipe Reserves. Shut-in Reserves are expected to be recovered from (1) completion intervals that are open at the time of the estimate but which have not yet started producing, (2) wells which were shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections, or (3) wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons. Behind-pipe Reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells that will require additional completion work or future re-completion before start of production with minor cost to access these reserves. In all cases, production can be initiated or restored with relatively low expenditure compared to the cost of drilling a new well.

(7) Development costs. Costs incurred to obtain access to proved reserves and to provide facilities for extracting, treating, gathering and storing the oil and gas. More specifically, development costs, including depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other costs of development activities, are costs incurred to:

 

  (i)

Gain access to and prepare well locations for drilling, including surveying well locations for the purpose of determining specific development drilling sites, clearing ground, draining, road building, and relocating public roads, gas lines, and power lines, to the extent necessary in developing the proved reserves.

 

  (ii)

Drill and equip development wells, development-type stratigraphic test wells, and service wells, including the costs of platforms and of well equipment such as casing, tubing, pumping equipment, and the wellhead assembly.

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

 

  (iii)

Acquire, construct, and install production facilities such as lease flow lines, separators, treaters, heaters, manifolds, measuring devices, and production storage tanks, natural gas cycling and processing plants, and central utility and waste disposal systems.

 

  (iv)

Provide improved recovery systems.

(8) Development project. A development project is the means by which petroleum resources are brought to the status of economically producible. As examples, the development of a single reservoir or field, an incremental development in a producing field, or the integrated development of a group of several fields and associated facilities with a common ownership may constitute a development project.

(9) Development well. A well drilled within the proved area of an oil or gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.

(10) Economically producible. The term economically producible, as it relates to a resource, means a resource which generates revenue that exceeds, or is reasonably expected to exceed, the costs of the operation. The value of the products that generate revenue shall be determined at the terminal point of oil and gas producing activities as defined in paragraph (a)(16) of this section.

(11) Estimated ultimate recovery (EUR). Estimated ultimate recovery is the sum of reserves remaining as of a given date and cumulative production as of that date.

(12) Exploration costs. Costs incurred in identifying areas that may warrant examination and in examining specific areas that are considered to have prospects of containing oil and gas reserves, including costs of drilling exploratory wells and exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells. Exploration costs may be incurred both before acquiring the related property (sometimes referred to in part as prospecting costs) and after acquiring the property. Principal types of exploration costs, which include depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other costs of exploration activities, are:

 

  (i)

Costs of topographical, geographical and geophysical studies, rights of access to properties to conduct those studies, and salaries and other expenses of geologists, geophysical crews, and others conducting those studies. Collectively, these are sometimes referred to as geological and geophysical or “G&G” costs.

 

  (ii)

Costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped properties, such as delay rentals, ad valorem taxes on properties, legal costs for title defense, and the maintenance of land and lease records.

 

  (iii)

Dry hole contributions and bottom hole contributions.

 

  (iv)

Costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells.

 

  (v)

Costs of drilling exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells.

(13) Exploratory well. An exploratory well is a well drilled to find a new field or to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of oil or gas in another reservoir. Generally, an exploratory well is any well that is not a development well, an extension well, a service well, or a stratigraphic test well as those items are defined in this section.

(14) Extension well. An extension well is a well drilled to extend the limits of a known reservoir.

(15) Field. An area consisting of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. There may be two or more reservoirs in a field which are separated vertically by intervening impervious strata, or laterally by local geologic barriers, or by both. Reservoirs that are associated by being in overlapping or adjacent fields may be treated as a single or common operational field. The geological terms “structural feature” and “stratigraphic condition” are intended to identify localized geological features as opposed to the broader terms of basins, trends, provinces, plays, areas-of-interest, etc.

(16) Oil and gas producing activities.

 

  (i)

Oil and gas producing activities include:

 

  (A)

The search for crude oil, including condensate and natural gas liquids, or natural gas (“oil and gas”) in their natural states and original locations;

 

  (B)

The acquisition of property rights or properties for the purpose of further exploration or for the purpose of removing the oil or gas from such properties;

 

  (C)

The construction, drilling, and production activities necessary to retrieve oil and gas from their natural reservoirs, including the acquisition, construction, installation, and maintenance of field gathering and storage systems, such as:

 

  (1)

Lifting the oil and gas to the surface; and

 

  (2)

Gathering, treating, and field processing (as in the case of processing gas to extract liquid hydrocarbons); and

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

 

  (D)

Extraction of saleable hydrocarbons, in the solid, liquid, or gaseous state, from oil sands, shale, coalbeds, or other nonrenewable natural resources which are intended to be upgraded into synthetic oil or gas, and activities undertaken with a view to such extraction.

Instruction 1 to paragraph (a)(16)(i): The oil and gas production function shall be regarded as ending at a “terminal point”, which is the outlet valve on the lease or field storage tank. If unusual physical or operational circumstances exist, it may be appropriate to regard the terminal point for the production function as:

 

  a.

The first point at which oil, gas, or gas liquids, natural or synthetic, are delivered to a main pipeline, a common carrier, a refinery, or a marine terminal; and

 

  b.

In the case of natural resources that are intended to be upgraded into synthetic oil or gas, if those natural resources are delivered to a purchaser prior to upgrading, the first point at which the natural resources are delivered to a main pipeline, a common carrier, a refinery, a marine terminal, or a facility which upgrades such natural resources into synthetic oil or gas.

Instruction 2 to paragraph (a)(16)(i): For purposes of this paragraph (a)(16), the term saleable hydrocarbons means hydrocarbons that are saleable in the state in which the hydrocarbons are delivered.

 

  (ii)

Oil and gas producing activities do not include:

 

  (A)

Transporting, refining, or marketing oil and gas;

 

  (B)

Processing of produced oil, gas, or natural resources that can be upgraded into synthetic oil or gas by a registrant that does not have the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in such production;

 

  (C)

Activities relating to the production of natural resources other than oil, gas, or natural resources from which synthetic oil and gas can be extracted; or

 

  (D)

Production of geothermal steam.

(17) Possible reserves. Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves.

 

  (i)

When deterministic methods are used, the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10% probability that the total quantities ultimately recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates.

 

  (ii)

Possible reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to probable reserves where data control and interpretations of available data are progressively less certain. Frequently, this will be in areas where geoscience and engineering data are unable to define clearly the area and vertical limits of commercial production from the reservoir by a defined project.

 

  (iii)

Possible reserves also include incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than the recovery quantities assumed for probable reserves.

 

  (iv)

The proved plus probable and proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates must be based on reasonable alternative technical and commercial interpretations within the reservoir or subject project that are clearly documented, including comparisons to results in successful similar projects.

 

  (v)

Possible reserves may be assigned where geoscience and engineering data identify directly adjacent portions of a reservoir within the same accumulation that may be separated from proved areas by faults with displacement less than formation thickness or other geological discontinuities and that have not been penetrated by a wellbore, and the registrant believes that such adjacent portions are in communication with the known (proved) reservoir. Possible reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher or lower than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

 

  (vi)

Pursuant to paragraph (a)(22)(iii) of this section, where direct observation has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves should be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir above the HKO only if the higher contact can be established with reasonable certainty through reliable technology. Portions of the reservoir that do not meet this reasonable certainty criterion may be assigned as probable and possible oil or gas based on reservoir fluid properties and pressure gradient interpretations.

(18) Probable reserves. Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.

 

  (i)

When deterministic methods are used, it is as likely as not that actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50% probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable reserves estimates.

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

 

  (ii)

Probable reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to proved reserves where data control or interpretations of available data are less certain, even if the interpreted reservoir continuity of structure or productivity does not meet the reasonable certainty criterion. Probable reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

 

  (iii)

Probable reserves estimates also include potential incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than assumed for proved reserves.

 

  (iv)

See also guidelines in paragraphs (a)(17)(iv) and (a)(17)(vi) of this section.

(19) Probabilistic estimate. The method of estimation of reserves or resources is called probabilistic when the full range of values that could reasonably occur for each unknown parameter (from the geoscience and engineering data) is used to generate a full range of possible outcomes and their associated probabilities of occurrence.

(20) Production costs.

 

  (i)

Costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities, including depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other costs of operating and maintaining those wells and related equipment and facilities. They become part of the cost of oil and gas produced. Examples of production costs (sometimes called lifting costs) are:

 

  (A)

Costs of labor to operate the wells and related equipment and facilities.

 

  (B)

Repairs and maintenance.

 

  (C)

Materials, supplies, and fuel consumed and supplies utilized in operating the wells and related equipment and facilities.

 

  (D)

Property taxes and insurance applicable to proved properties and wells and related equipment and facilities.

 

  (E)

Severance taxes.

 

  (ii)

Some support equipment or facilities may serve two or more oil and gas producing activities and may also serve transportation, refining, and marketing activities. To the extent that the support equipment and facilities are used in oil and gas producing activities, their depreciation and applicable operating costs become exploration, development or production costs, as appropriate. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of capitalized acquisition, exploration, and development costs are not production costs but also become part of the cost of oil and gas produced along with production (lifting) costs identified above.

(21) Proved area. The part of a property to which proved reserves have been specifically attributed.

(22) Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

 

  (i)

The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:

 

  (A)

The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and

 

  (B)

Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

 

  (ii)

In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

 

  (iii)

Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

 

  (iv)

Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:

 

  (A)

Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

 

  (B)

The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

 

  (v)

Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

(23) Proved properties. Properties with proved reserves.

(24) Reasonable certainty. If deterministic methods are used, reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the estimate. A high degree of confidence exists if the quantity is much more likely to be achieved than not, and, as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical), engineering, and economic data are made to estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time, reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease.

(25) Reliable technology. Reliable technology is a grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods) that has been field tested and has been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation.

(26) Reserves. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.

Note to paragraph (a)(26): Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir (i.e., absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources (i.e., potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).

Excerpted from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas:

932-235-50-30 A standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to an entity’s interests in both of the following shall be disclosed as of the end of the year:

 

  a.

Proved oil and gas reserves (see paragraphs 932-235-50-3 through 50-11B)

 

  b.

Oil and gas subject to purchase under long-term supply, purchase, or similar agreements and contracts in which the entity participates in the operation of the properties on which the oil or gas is located or otherwise serves as the producer of those reserves (see paragraph 932-235-50-7).

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to those two types of interests in reserves may be combined for reporting purposes.

932-235-50-31 All of the following information shall be disclosed in the aggregate and for each geographic area for which reserve quantities are disclosed in accordance with paragraphs 932-235-50-3 through 50-11B:    

 

  a.

Future cash inflows. These shall be computed by applying prices used in estimating the entity’s proved oil and gas reserves to the year-end quantities of those reserves. Future price changes shall be considered only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements in existence at year-end.

 

  b.

Future development and production costs. These costs shall be computed by estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved oil and gas reserves at the end of the year, based on year-end costs and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions. If estimated development expenditures are significant, they shall be presented separately from estimated production costs.

 

  c.

Future income tax expenses. These expenses shall be computed by applying the appropriate year-end statutory tax rates, with consideration of future tax rates already legislated, to the future pretax net cash flows relating to the entity’s proved oil and gas reserves, less the tax basis of the properties involved. The future income tax expenses shall give effect to tax deductions and tax credits and allowances relating to the entity’s proved oil and gas reserves.

 

  d.

Future net cash flows. These amounts are the result of subtracting future development and production costs and future income tax expenses from future cash inflows.

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

 

  e.

Discount. This amount shall be derived from using a discount rate of 10 percent a year to reflect the timing of the future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves.

 

  f.

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. This amount is the future net cash flows less the computed discount.

(27) Reservoir. A porous and permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of producible oil and/or gas that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is individual and separate from other reservoirs.

(28) Resources. Resources are quantities of oil and gas estimated to exist in naturally occurring accumulations. A portion of the resources may be estimated to be recoverable, and another portion may be considered to be unrecoverable. Resources include both discovered and undiscovered accumulations.

(29) Service well. A well drilled or completed for the purpose of supporting production in an existing field. Specific purposes of service wells include gas injection, water injection, steam injection, air injection, salt-water disposal, water supply for injection, observation, or injection for in-situ combustion.

(30) Stratigraphic test well. A stratigraphic test well is a drilling effort, geologically directed, to obtain information pertaining to a specific geologic condition. Such wells customarily are drilled without the intent of being completed for hydrocarbon production. The classification also includes tests identified as core tests and all types of expendable holes related to hydrocarbon exploration. Stratigraphic tests are classified as “exploratory type” if not drilled in a known area or “development type” if drilled in a known area.

(31) Undeveloped oil and gas reserves. Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

 

  (i)

Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.

 

  (ii)

Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time.

From the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (October 26, 2009):

Although several types of projects — such as constructing offshore platforms and development in urban areas, remote locations or environmentally sensitive locations — by their nature customarily take a longer time to develop and therefore often do justify longer time periods, this determination must always take into consideration all of the facts and circumstances. No particular type of project per se justifies a longer time period, and any extension beyond five years should be the exception, and not the rule.

Factors that a company should consider in determining whether or not circumstances justify recognizing reserves even though development may extend past five years include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

   

The company’s level of ongoing significant development activities in the area to be developed (for example, drilling only the minimum number of wells necessary to maintain the lease generally would not constitute significant development activities);

 

   

The company’s historical record at completing development of comparable long-term projects;    

 

   

The amount of time in which the company has maintained the leases, or booked the reserves, without significant development activities;

 

   

The extent to which the company has followed a previously adopted development plan (for example, if a company has changed its development plan several times without taking significant steps to implement any of those plans, recognizing proved undeveloped reserves typically would not be appropriate); and

 

   

The extent to which delays in development are caused by external factors related to the physical operating environment (for example, restrictions on development on Federal lands, but not obtaining government permits), rather than by internal factors (for example, shifting resources to develop properties with higher priority).

 

  (iii)

Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

(32) Unproved properties. Properties with no proved reserves.

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

ROBERT C. BARG

P. SCOTT FROST

JOHN G. HATTNER

JOSEPH J. SPELLMAN

RICHARD B. TALLEY, JR.

 

 

Exhibit 99.3

 

CHAIRMAN & CEO

C.H. (SCOTT) REES III

 

PRESIDENT & COO

DANNY D. SIMMONS

 

January 17, 2022

Mr. Brett Knight

Crescent Energy Company

600 Travis Street, Suite 7200

Houston, Texas 77002

Dear Mr. Knight:

In accordance with your request, we have estimated the proved reserves and future revenue, as of December 31, 2021, to the Crescent Energy Company (Crescent) interest in certain oil and gas properties located in Brea-Olinda Field, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California. We completed our evaluation on or about the date of this letter. It is our understanding that the proved reserves estimated in this report constitute approximately 3 percent of all proved reserves owned by Crescent. The estimates in this report have been prepared in accordance with the definitions and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, with the exception of the exclusion of future income taxes, conform to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas. Definitions are presented immediately following this letter. This report has been prepared for Crescent’s use in filing with the SEC; in our opinion the assumptions, data, methods, and procedures used in the preparation of this report are appropriate for such purpose.

We estimate the net reserves and future net revenue to the Crescent interest in these properties, as of December 31, 2021, to be:

 

     Net Reserves      Future Net Revenue (M$)  

Category

   Oil
(MBBL)
     NGL
(MBBL)
     Total      Present Worth
at 10%
 

Proved Developed Producing

     14,140.4        353.5        421,056.1        177,661.7  

Proved Developed Non-Producing

     1,472.7        36.8        50,768.9        19,209.9  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Proved Developed

     15,613.1        390.3        471,825.0        196,871.6  

The oil volumes shown include crude oil only. Oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) volumes are expressed in thousands of barrels (MBBL); a barrel is equivalent to 42 United States gallons. Residual produced gas is consumed in field operations.

Reserves categorization conveys the relative degree of certainty; reserves subcategorization is based on development and production status. Our study indicates that as of December 31, 2021, there are no proved undeveloped reserves for these properties. As requested, probable reserves that exist for these properties have not been included. No study was made to determine whether possible reserves might be established for these properties. The estimates of reserves and future revenue included herein have not been adjusted for risk. This report does not include any value that could be attributed to interests in undeveloped acreage.

Gross revenue is Crescent’s share of the gross (100 percent) revenue from the properties prior to any deductions. Future net revenue is after deductions for Crescent’s share of production taxes, ad valorem taxes, capital costs, abandonment costs, operating expenses, and payments to net profits interests but before consideration of any income taxes. The future net revenue has been discounted at an annual rate of 10 percent to determine its present worth, which is shown to indicate the effect of time on the value of money. Future net revenue presented in this report, whether discounted or undiscounted, should not be construed as being the fair market value of the properties.

 

2100 ROSS AVENUE, SUITE 2200 • DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 PH: 214-969-5401 • FAX: 214-969-5411

1301 MCKINNEY STREET, SUITE 3200 • HOUSTON, TEXAS 77010 • PH: 713-654-4950 • FAX: 713-654-4951

  

[email protected]

netherlandsewell.com


LOGO

 

Prices used in this report are based on the 12-month unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month in the period January through December 2021. For oil and NGL volumes, the average West Texas Intermediate spot price of $66.56 per barrel is adjusted for quality, transportation fees, and market differentials. All prices are held constant throughout the lives of the properties. The average adjusted product prices weighted by production over the remaining lives of the properties are $66.98 per barrel of oil and $53.91 per barrel of NGL.

Operating costs used in this report are based on operating expense records of Bridge Energy LLC (Bridge), the operator of the properties. As requested, operating costs are limited to direct lease- and field-level costs and Bridge’s estimate of the portion of its headquarters general and administrative overhead expenses necessary to operate the properties. Operating costs have been divided into field-level costs, per-well costs, and per-unit-of-production costs and are not escalated for inflation.

Capital costs used in this report were provided by Bridge and are based on authorizations for expenditure and actual costs from recent activity. Capital costs are included as required for workovers and production equipment. Based on our understanding of future development plans, a review of the records provided to us, and our knowledge of similar properties, we regard these estimated capital costs to be reasonable. Abandonment costs used in this report are Bridge’s estimates of the costs to abandon the wells and production facilities, net of any salvage value. Capital costs and abandonment costs are not escalated for inflation.

For the purposes of this report, we did not perform any field inspection of the properties, nor did we examine the mechanical operation or condition of the wells and facilities. We have not investigated possible environmental liability related to the properties; therefore, our estimates do not include any costs due to such possible liability.    

We have made no investigation of potential volume and value imbalances resulting from overdelivery or underdelivery to the Crescent interest. Therefore, our estimates of reserves and future revenue do not include adjustments for the settlement of any such imbalances; our projections are based on Crescent receiving its net revenue interest share of estimated future gross production. Additionally, we have made no specific investigation of any firm transportation contracts that may be in place for these properties; our estimates of future revenue include the effects of such contracts only to the extent that the associated fees are accounted for in the historical field- and lease-level accounting statements.

The reserves shown in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as exact quantities. Proved reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of engineering and geoscience data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible; probable and possible reserves are those additional reserves which are sequentially less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. Estimates of reserves may increase or decrease as a result of market conditions, future operations, changes in regulations, or actual reservoir performance. In addition to the primary economic assumptions discussed herein, our estimates are based on certain assumptions including, but not limited to, that the properties will be developed consistent with current development plans as provided to us by Bridge, that the properties will be operated in a prudent manner, that no governmental regulations or controls will be put in place that would impact the ability of the interest owner to recover the reserves, and that our projections of future production will prove consistent with actual performance. If the reserves are recovered, the revenues therefrom and the costs related thereto could be more or less than the estimated amounts. Because of governmental policies and uncertainties of supply and demand, the sales rates, prices received for the reserves, and costs incurred in recovering such reserves may vary from assumptions made while preparing this report.

For the purposes of this report, we used technical and economic data including, but not limited to, well logs, geologic maps, well test data, production data, historical price and cost information, and property ownership interests. The reserves in this report have been estimated using deterministic methods; these estimates have been prepared in accordance with the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE Standards). We used standard engineering and geoscience methods, or a combination of methods, including performance analysis and analogy, that we considered


LOGO

 

to be appropriate and necessary to categorize and estimate reserves in accordance with SEC definitions and regulations. As in all aspects of oil and gas evaluation, there are uncertainties inherent in the interpretation of engineering and geoscience data; therefore, our conclusions necessarily represent only informed professional judgment.    

The data used in our estimates were obtained from Crescent, Bridge, public data sources, and the nonconfidential files of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI) and were accepted as accurate. Supporting work data are on file in our office. We have not examined the titles to the properties or independently confirmed the actual degree or type of interest owned. The technical persons primarily responsible for preparing the estimates presented herein meet the requirements regarding qualifications, independence, objectivity, and confidentiality set forth in the SPE Standards. C. Ashley Smith, a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, has been practicing consulting petroleum engineering at NSAI since 2006 and has over 5 years of prior industry experience. Shane M. Howell, a Licensed Professional Geoscientist in the State of Texas, has been practicing consulting petroleum geoscience at NSAI since 2005 and has over 7 years of prior industry experience. We are independent petroleum engineers, geologists, geophysicists, and petrophysicists; we do not own an interest in these properties nor are we employed on a contingent basis.

 

Sincerely,
NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-2699
By:   LOGO
  C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

By:   LOGO   LOGO   By:   LOGO   LOGO
  C. Ashley Smith, P.E. 100560     Shane M. Howell, P.G. 11276
  Vice President     Vice President
Date Signed: January 17, 2022  

 

Date Signed: January 17, 2022

 

CAS:RQH

   


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

The following definitions are set forth in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a). Also included is supplemental information from (1) the 2018 Petroleum Resources Management System approved by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, (2) the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas, and (3) the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.

(1) Acquisition of properties. Costs incurred to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire a property, including costs of lease bonuses and options to purchase or lease properties, the portion of costs applicable to minerals when land including mineral rights is purchased in fee, brokers’ fees, recording fees, legal costs, and other costs incurred in acquiring properties.

(2) Analogous reservoir. Analogous reservoirs, as used in resources assessments, have similar rock and fluid properties, reservoir conditions (depth, temperature, and pressure) and drive mechanisms, but are typically at a more advanced stage of development than the reservoir of interest and thus may provide concepts to assist in the interpretation of more limited data and estimation of recovery. When used to support proved reserves, an “analogous reservoir” refers to a reservoir that shares the following characteristics with the reservoir of interest:

 

  (i)

Same geological formation (but not necessarily in pressure communication with the reservoir of interest);

 

  (ii)

Same environment of deposition;

 

  (iii)

Similar geological structure; and

 

  (iv)

Same drive mechanism.

Instruction to paragraph (a)(2) : Reservoir properties must, in the aggregate, be no more favorable in the analog than in the reservoir of interest.

(3) Bitumen. Bitumen, sometimes referred to as natural bitumen, is petroleum in a solid or semi-solid state in natural deposits with a viscosity greater than 10,000 centipoise measured at original temperature in the deposit and atmospheric pressure, on a gas free basis. In its natural state it usually contains sulfur, metals, and other non-hydrocarbons.

(4) Condensate. Condensate is a mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in the gaseous phase at original reservoir temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, is in the liquid phase at surface pressure and temperature.

(5) Deterministic estimate. The method of estimating reserves or resources is called deterministic when a single value for each parameter (from the geoscience, engineering, or economic data) in the reserves calculation is used in the reserves estimation procedure.

(6) Developed oil and gas reserves. Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

 

  (i)

Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and

 

  (ii)

Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

Supplemental definitions from the 2018 Petroleum Resources Management System:

Developed Producing Reserves – Expected quantities to be recovered from completion intervals that are open and producing at the effective date of the estimate. Improved recovery Reserves are considered producing only after the improved recovery project is in operation.

Developed Non-Producing Reserves – Shut-in and behind-pipe Reserves. Shut-in Reserves are expected to be recovered from (1) completion intervals that are open at the time of the estimate but which have not yet started producing, (2) wells which were shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections, or (3) wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons. Behind-pipe Reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells that will require additional completion work or future re-completion before start of production with minor cost to access these reserves. In all cases, production can be initiated or restored with relatively low expenditure compared to the cost of drilling a new well.    

(7) Development costs. Costs incurred to obtain access to proved reserves and to provide facilities for extracting, treating, gathering and storing the oil and gas. More specifically, development costs, including depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other costs of development activities, are costs incurred to:

 

  (i)

Gain access to and prepare well locations for drilling, including surveying well locations for the purpose of determining specific development drilling sites, clearing ground, draining, road building, and relocating public roads, gas lines, and power lines, to the extent necessary in developing the proved reserves.

 

  (ii)

Drill and equip development wells, development-type stratigraphic test wells, and service wells, including the costs of platforms and of well equipment such as casing, tubing, pumping equipment, and the wellhead assembly.

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

  (iii)

Acquire, construct, and install production facilities such as lease flow lines, separators, treaters, heaters, manifolds, measuring devices, and production storage tanks, natural gas cycling and processing plants, and central utility and waste disposal systems.

 

  (iv)

Provide improved recovery systems.

(8) Development project. A development project is the means by which petroleum resources are brought to the status of economically producible. As examples, the development of a single reservoir or field, an incremental development in a producing field, or the integrated development of a group of several fields and associated facilities with a common ownership may constitute a development project.

(9) Development well. A well drilled within the proved area of an oil or gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.

(10) Economically producible. The term economically producible, as it relates to a resource, means a resource which generates revenue that exceeds, or is reasonably expected to exceed, the costs of the operation. The value of the products that generate revenue shall be determined at the terminal point of oil and gas producing activities as defined in paragraph (a)(16) of this section.

(11) Estimated ultimate recovery (EUR). Estimated ultimate recovery is the sum of reserves remaining as of a given date and cumulative production as of that date.

(12) Exploration costs. Costs incurred in identifying areas that may warrant examination and in examining specific areas that are considered to have prospects of containing oil and gas reserves, including costs of drilling exploratory wells and exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells. Exploration costs may be incurred both before acquiring the related property (sometimes referred to in part as prospecting costs) and after acquiring the property. Principal types of exploration costs, which include depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other costs of exploration activities, are:

 

  (i)

Costs of topographical, geographical and geophysical studies, rights of access to properties to conduct those studies, and salaries and other expenses of geologists, geophysical crews, and others conducting those studies. Collectively, these are sometimes referred to as geological and geophysical or “G&G” costs.

 

  (ii)

Costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped properties, such as delay rentals, ad valorem taxes on properties, legal costs for title defense, and the maintenance of land and lease records.

 

  (iii)

Dry hole contributions and bottom hole contributions.

 

  (iv)

Costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells.

 

  (v)

Costs of drilling exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells.

(13) Exploratory well. An exploratory well is a well drilled to find a new field or to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of oil or gas in another reservoir. Generally, an exploratory well is any well that is not a development well, an extension well, a service well, or a stratigraphic test well as those items are defined in this section.

(14) Extension well. An extension well is a well drilled to extend the limits of a known reservoir.

(15) Field. An area consisting of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. There may be two or more reservoirs in a field which are separated vertically by intervening impervious strata, or laterally by local geologic barriers, or by both. Reservoirs that are associated by being in overlapping or adjacent fields may be treated as a single or common operational field. The geological terms “structural feature” and “stratigraphic condition” are intended to identify localized geological features as opposed to the broader terms of basins, trends, provinces, plays, areas-of-interest, etc.

(16) Oil and gas producing activities.

 

  (i)

Oil and gas producing activities include:

 

  (A)

The search for crude oil, including condensate and natural gas liquids, or natural gas (“oil and gas”) in their natural states and original locations;

 

  (B)

The acquisition of property rights or properties for the purpose of further exploration or for the purpose of removing the oil or gas from such properties;

 

  (C)

The construction, drilling, and production activities necessary to retrieve oil and gas from their natural reservoirs, including the acquisition, construction, installation, and maintenance of field gathering and storage systems, such as:

 

  (1)

Lifting the oil and gas to the surface; and

 

  (2)

Gathering, treating, and field processing (as in the case of processing gas to extract liquid hydrocarbons); and

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

  (D)

Extraction of saleable hydrocarbons, in the solid, liquid, or gaseous state, from oil sands, shale, coalbeds, or other nonrenewable natural resources which are intended to be upgraded into synthetic oil or gas, and activities undertaken with a view to such extraction.

Instruction 1 to paragraph (a)(16)(i): The oil and gas production function shall be regarded as ending at a “terminal point”, which is the outlet valve on the lease or field storage tank. If unusual physical or operational circumstances exist, it may be appropriate to regard the terminal point for the production function as:

 

  a.

The first point at which oil, gas, or gas liquids, natural or synthetic, are delivered to a main pipeline, a common carrier, a refinery, or a marine terminal; and

 

  b.

In the case of natural resources that are intended to be upgraded into synthetic oil or gas, if those natural resources are delivered to a purchaser prior to upgrading, the first point at which the natural resources are delivered to a main pipeline, a common carrier, a refinery, a marine terminal, or a facility which upgrades such natural resources into synthetic oil or gas.

Instruction 2 to paragraph (a)(16)(i): For purposes of this paragraph (a)(16), the term saleable hydrocarbons means hydrocarbons that are saleable in the state in which the hydrocarbons are delivered.

 

  (ii)

Oil and gas producing activities do not include:

 

  (A)

Transporting, refining, or marketing oil and gas;

 

  (B)

Processing of produced oil, gas, or natural resources that can be upgraded into synthetic oil or gas by a registrant that does not have the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in such production;

 

  (C)

Activities relating to the production of natural resources other than oil, gas, or natural resources from which synthetic oil and gas can be extracted; or

 

  (D)

Production of geothermal steam.

(17) Possible reserves. Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves.

 

  (i)

When deterministic methods are used, the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10% probability that the total quantities ultimately recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates.

 

  (ii)

Possible reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to probable reserves where data control and interpretations of available data are progressively less certain. Frequently, this will be in areas where geoscience and engineering data are unable to define clearly the area and vertical limits of commercial production from the reservoir by a defined project.

 

  (iii)

Possible reserves also include incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than the recovery quantities assumed for probable reserves.

 

  (iv)

The proved plus probable and proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates must be based on reasonable alternative technical and commercial interpretations within the reservoir or subject project that are clearly documented, including comparisons to results in successful similar projects.

 

  (v)

Possible reserves may be assigned where geoscience and engineering data identify directly adjacent portions of a reservoir within the same accumulation that may be separated from proved areas by faults with displacement less than formation thickness or other geological discontinuities and that have not been penetrated by a wellbore, and the registrant believes that such adjacent portions are in communication with the known (proved) reservoir. Possible reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher or lower than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

 

  (vi)

Pursuant to paragraph (a)(22)(iii) of this section, where direct observation has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves should be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir above the HKO only if the higher contact can be established with reasonable certainty through reliable technology. Portions of the reservoir that do not meet this reasonable certainty criterion may be assigned as probable and possible oil or gas based on reservoir fluid properties and pressure gradient interpretations.

(18) Probable reserves. Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.

 

  (i)

When deterministic methods are used, it is as likely as not that actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50% probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable reserves estimates.

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

  (ii)

Probable reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to proved reserves where data control or interpretations of available data are less certain, even if the interpreted reservoir continuity of structure or productivity does not meet the reasonable certainty criterion. Probable reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

 

  (iii)

Probable reserves estimates also include potential incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than assumed for proved reserves.

 

  (iv)

See also guidelines in paragraphs (a)(17)(iv) and (a)(17)(vi) of this section.

(19) Probabilistic estimate. The method of estimation of reserves or resources is called probabilistic when the full range of values that could reasonably occur for each unknown parameter (from the geoscience and engineering data) is used to generate a full range of possible outcomes and their associated probabilities of occurrence.

(20) Production costs.

 

  (i)

Costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities, including depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other costs of operating and maintaining those wells and related equipment and facilities. They become part of the cost of oil and gas produced. Examples of production costs (sometimes called lifting costs) are:

 

  (A)

Costs of labor to operate the wells and related equipment and facilities.

 

  (B)

Repairs and maintenance.

 

  (C)

Materials, supplies, and fuel consumed and supplies utilized in operating the wells and related equipment and facilities.

 

  (D)

Property taxes and insurance applicable to proved properties and wells and related equipment and facilities.

 

  (E)

Severance taxes.

 

  (ii)

Some support equipment or facilities may serve two or more oil and gas producing activities and may also serve transportation, refining, and marketing activities. To the extent that the support equipment and facilities are used in oil and gas producing activities, their depreciation and applicable operating costs become exploration, development or production costs, as appropriate. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of capitalized acquisition, exploration, and development costs are not production costs but also become part of the cost of oil and gas produced along with production (lifting) costs identified above.

(21) Proved area. The part of a property to which proved reserves have been specifically attributed.

(22) Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

 

  (i)

The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:

 

  (A)

The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and

 

  (B)

Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

 

  (ii)

In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

 

  (iii)

Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

 

  (iv)

Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:

 

  (A)

Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

  (B)

The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

 

  (v)

Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

(23) Proved properties. Properties with proved reserves.

(24) Reasonable certainty. If deterministic methods are used, reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the estimate. A high degree of confidence exists if the quantity is much more likely to be achieved than not, and, as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical), engineering, and economic data are made to estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time, reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease. (25) Reliable technology. Reliable technology is a grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods) that has been field tested and has been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation.

(26) Reserves. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.

Note to paragraph (a)(26) : Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir (i.e., absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources (i.e., potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).

Excerpted from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas:

932-235-50-30 A standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to an entity’s interests in both of the following shall be disclosed as of the end of the year:

 

  a.

Proved oil and gas reserves (see paragraphs 932-235-50-3 through 50-11B)

 

  b.

Oil and gas subject to purchase under long-term supply, purchase, or similar agreements and contracts in which the entity participates in the operation of the properties on which the oil or gas is located or otherwise serves as the producer of those reserves (see paragraph 932-235-50-7).

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to those two types of interests in reserves may be combined for reporting purposes.

932-235-50-31 All of the following information shall be disclosed in the aggregate and for each geographic area for which reserve quantities are disclosed in accordance with paragraphs 932-235-50-3 through 50-11B:

 

  a.

Future cash inflows. These shall be computed by applying prices used in estimating the entity’s proved oil and gas reserves to the year-end quantities of those reserves. Future price changes shall be considered only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements in existence at year-end.

 

  b.

Future development and production costs. These costs shall be computed by estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved oil and gas reserves at the end of the year, based on year-end costs and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions. If estimated development expenditures are significant, they shall be presented separately from estimated production costs.

 

  c.

Future income tax expenses. These expenses shall be computed by applying the appropriate year-end statutory tax rates, with consideration of future tax rates already legislated, to the future pretax net cash flows relating to the entity’s proved oil and gas reserves, less the tax basis of the properties involved. The future income tax expenses shall give effect to tax deductions and tax credits and allowances relating to the entity’s proved oil and gas reserves.

 

  d.

Future net cash flows. These amounts are the result of subtracting future development and production costs and future income tax expenses from future cash inflows.

 


LOGO

DEFINITIONS OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Adapted from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Section 210.4-10(a)

 

  e.

Discount. This amount shall be derived from using a discount rate of 10 percent a year to reflect the timing of the future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves.

 

  f.

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. This amount is the future net cash flows less the computed discount.

(27) Reservoir. A porous and permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of producible oil and/or gas that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is individual and separate from other reservoirs.

(28) Resources. Resources are quantities of oil and gas estimated to exist in naturally occurring accumulations. A portion of the resources may be estimated to be recoverable, and another portion may be considered to be unrecoverable. Resources include both discovered and undiscovered accumulations.

(29) Service well. A well drilled or completed for the purpose of supporting production in an existing field. Specific purposes of service wells include gas injection, water injection, steam injection, air injection, salt-water disposal, water supply for injection, observation, or injection for in-situ combustion.

(30) Stratigraphic test well. A stratigraphic test well is a drilling effort, geologically directed, to obtain information pertaining to a specific geologic condition. Such wells customarily are drilled without the intent of being completed for hydrocarbon production. The classification also includes tests identified as core tests and all types of expendable holes related to hydrocarbon exploration. Stratigraphic tests are classified as “exploratory type” if not drilled in a known area or “development type” if drilled in a known area.

(31) Undeveloped oil and gas reserves. Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

 

  (i)

Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.

 

  (ii)

Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time.

From the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (October 26, 2009):

Although several types of projects — such as constructing offshore platforms and development in urban areas, remote locations or environmentally sensitive locations — by their nature customarily take a longer time to develop and therefore often do justify longer time periods, this determination must always take into consideration all of the facts and circumstances. No particular type of project per se justifies a longer time period, and any extension beyond five years should be the exception, and not the rule.

Factors that a company should consider in determining whether or not circumstances justify recognizing reserves even though development may extend past five years include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

   

The company’s level of ongoing significant development activities in the area to be developed (for example, drilling only the minimum number of wells necessary to maintain the lease generally would not constitute significant development activities);

 

   

The company’s historical record at completing development of comparable long-term projects;

 

   

The amount of time in which the company has maintained the leases, or booked the reserves, without significant development activities;

 

   

The extent to which the company has followed a previously adopted development plan (for example, if a company has changed its development plan several times without taking significant steps to implement any of those plans, recognizing proved undeveloped reserves typically would not be appropriate); and

 

   

The extent to which delays in development are caused by external factors related to the physical operating environment (for example, restrictions on development on Federal lands, but not obtaining government permits), rather than by internal factors (for example, shifting resources to develop properties with higher priority).

 

  (iii)

Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

(32) Unproved properties. Properties with no proved reserves.

 

Exhibit 99.4

CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.

PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

 

13640 BRIARWICK DRIVE, SUITE 100    306 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 302    1000 LOUISIANA STREET, SUITE 1900
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729-1107    FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-4987    HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5008
512-249-7000    817- 336-2461    713-651-9944
   www.cgaus.com   

January 13, 2022

Mr. Brett Knight

Director, Corporate Reserves

Crescent Energy Company

600 Travis, Suite 7200

Houston, Texas 77002

 

 

Re:  Evaluation Summary – SEC Pricing

 

Crescent Energy Company Interests

 

Total Proved Reserves

 

Certain Properties in Texas

 

As of December 31, 2021

 

Pursuant to the Guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Reporting Corporate Reserves and Future Net Revenue

Dear Mr. Knight:

As requested by Crescent Energy Company (“Company”), this report was prepared on January 13, 2022 for the purpose of submitting our estimates of total proved reserves and forecasts attributable to the Company ownership interests. We evaluated approximately 23% of the Company’s proved reserves, which are made up of certain oil and gas properties located in the Eagle Ford trend of Texas. This evaluation utilized an effective date of December 31, 2021, was prepared using constant prices and costs, and conforms to Item 1202(a)(8) of Regulation S-K and other rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This report has been prepared for the Company’s use in filing with the SEC; in our opinion the assumptions, data, methods, and procedures used in the preparation of this report are appropriate for such purpose. The results of this evaluation are presented in the table below:

 

            Proved
Developed
Producing
     Proved
Developed
Non-Producing
     Proved
Developed
Shut-In
     Proved
Undeveloped
     Total Proved
Summary
 

Net Reserves

                 

Oil

     - Mbbl        31,451.0        4,747.2        186.8        41,039.4        77,424.4  

Gas

     - MMcf        92,766.3        2,386.0        68.6        32,544.5        127,765.4  

NGL

     - Mbbl        15,511.5        323.4        10.9        5,315.7        21,161.5  

MBOE

     - Mbbl        62,423.5        5,468.3        209.1        51,779.2        119,880.1  

Net Revenue

           

Oil

     - M$        2,035,118.4        306,002.7        12,042.5        2,648,026.3        5,001,189.5  

Gas

     - M$        347,333.9        9,055.3        258.5        122,018.8        478,666.4  

NGL

     - M$        461,901.3        9,281.2        308.4        151,883.8        623,374.8  

Other

     - M$        136,316.9        0.0        0.0        0.0        136,316.6  

Severance Taxes

     - M$        129,067.1        15,168.4        589.0        135,864.7        280,689.4  

Ad Valorem Taxes

     - M$        70,331.8        8,635.8        336.6        77,220.5        156,524.7  

Operating Expenses

     - M$        1,105,959.8        40,341.5        5,012.3        434,839.8        1,586,152.9  

Workover Expenses

     - M$        137,372.9        9,054.5        1,794.5        96,354.0        244,576.3  

Future Development Costs

     - M$        42,990.8        20,532.9        472.4        762,465.6        826,461.8  

Net Operating Income (BFIT)

     - M$        1,494,948.4        230,606.0        4,404.7        1,415,184.3        3,145,143.0  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Discounted @ 10%

     - M$        920,308.5        134,952.1        3,071.8        637,360.3        1,695,693.0  


Crescent Energy Company Interests

January 13, 2022

Page 2

 

Proved Developed (“PD”) reserves are the summation of the Proved Developed Producing (“PDP”), Proved Developed Non-Producing (“PDNP”) and Proved Developed Shut-In (“PDSI”) estimates. Proved Developed reserves were estimated at 36,385.0 Mbbl oil, 95,220.9 MMcf gas and 15,845.8 Mbbl NGLs (or 68,100.9 MBOE). Of the Proved Developed reserves, 62,423.5 MBOE was attributed to producing zones in existing wells and 5,677.4 MBOE was attributed to zones in existing wells not producing.

Future net revenue is prior to deducting state production taxes and ad valorem taxes. Future net cash flow (net operating income) is after deducting these taxes, future development costs and operating expenses, but before consideration of federal income taxes. In accordance with SEC guidelines, the future net cash flow has been discounted at an annual rate of ten percent to determine its “present worth”. The present worth is shown to indicate the effect of time on the value of money and should not be construed as being the fair market value of the properties by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. (“CG&A”).

Hydrocarbon Pricing

The base SEC oil and gas prices calculated for December 31, 2021 were $66.56/bbl and $3.598/MMBTU, respectively. As specified by the SEC, a company must use a 12-month average price, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period. The base oil price is based upon WTI-Cushing spot prices (EIA) during 2021 and the base gas price is based upon Henry Hub spot prices (Gas Daily) during 2021.

The base prices were adjusted for differentials on a per-property basis, which may include local basis differentials, transportation, gas shrinkage, gas heating value (BTU content) and/or crude quality and gravity corrections. After these adjustments, the net realized prices for the SEC price case over the life of the proved properties was estimated to be $64.595 per barrel for oil, $3.746 per MCF for natural gas and $29.459 per barrel for NGL. All economic factors were held constant in accordance with SEC guidelines.

Economic Parameters

Operating expenses, 3rd party COPAS and capital expenditures (future development costs) were not escalated in accordance with SEC guidelines. Lease operating expenses and 3rd party COPAS fees were applied on a per property basis as estimated by the Company from the October 2020 through October 2021 lease operating statements. Lease operating expenses (LOE), workover expenses and future development costs were provided by the Company and audited by us at a summary level. Our audit determined that the commercial parameters being applied were reasonable and appropriate, and therefore no changes were made to cost parameters. Severance tax values were determined by applying normal state severance tax rates. Ad valorem tax rates were forecast as provided at approximately 2.5% of revenue. Variable operating expenses were applied to all wells to capture gas and/or liquids transportation costs plus water disposal costs.

For the non-producing PUD properties, LOE was also scheduled as provided by production lift type and type curve area. Future development capital information was provided by the Company based upon their significant drilling and completion activities in recent years. The drill and complete (D&C) costs were applied by lateral length and completions type for all Eagle Ford locations.

SEC Conformance and Regulations

The reserve classifications and the economic considerations used herein conform to the criteria of the SEC as defined in pages 6 and 7 below in the Appendix. The reserves and economics are predicated on regulatory agency classifications, rules, policies, laws, taxes and royalties currently in effect except as noted herein. The possible effects of changes in legislation or other Federal or State restrictive actions which could affect the reserves and economics have not been considered. However, we do not anticipate nor are we aware of any legislative changes or restrictive regulatory actions that may impact the recovery of reserves.


Crescent Energy Company Interests

January 13, 2022

Page 3

 

CG&A evaluated 2086 PDP properties for this report, each with daily production data through 11/30/2021 as provided by the Company. We also evaluated a “Springfield Credits” cost case as part of the PDP value. This report also includes 23 PDSI properties, of which seven (7) are scheduled to return to production, along with 12 PDNP properties, each drilled and cased but awaiting final completion as of the date of this report.

In addition, CG&A evaluated 213 commercial PUD drilling opportunities all targeting the Eagle Ford reservoir. All PUD drills were modeled as horizontal wells offsetting production from existing horizontal producers. Reserves for each PUD location were assigned by type curve area depending upon the region and nearby analogous production. Each of these drilling locations proposed as part of the Company’s development plan conforms to the proved undeveloped standards as set forth by the SEC. In our opinion, the Company has indicated they have every intent to complete this development plan within the next five years. Furthermore, the Company has demonstrated that they have the proper staffing, financial backing and prior development success to ensure this five year development plan will be fully executed.

Reserve Estimation Methods

The methods employed in estimating reserves are described on page 5 below in the Appendix. Reserves for proved developed producing wells were estimated using production performance methods for the vast majority of properties. Certain new producing properties with very little production history were forecast using a combination of production performance and analogy to similar production, both of which are considered to provide a relatively high degree of accuracy.

Non-producing reserve estimates, for both developed and undeveloped properties, were forecast using either volumetric or analogy methods, or a combination of both. These methods provide a relatively high degree of accuracy for predicting proved developed non-producing and proved undeveloped reserves for the Company properties, due to the mature nature of their properties targeted for development and an abundance of subsurface control data. The assumptions, data, methods and procedures used herein are appropriate for the purpose served by this report.

General Discussion

The estimates and forecasts were based upon interpretations of data furnished by your office and available from our files. To some extent information from public records has been used to check and/or supplement these data. The basic engineering and geological data were subject to third party reservations and qualifications. Nothing has come to our attention, however, that would cause us to believe that we are not justified in relying on such data. All estimates represent our best judgment based on the data available at the time of preparation. Due to inherent uncertainties in future production rates, commodity prices and geologic conditions, it should be realized that the reserve estimates, the reserves actually recovered, the revenue derived therefrom and the actual cost incurred could be more or less than the estimated amounts.

An on-site field inspection of the properties has not been performed. The mechanical operation or condition of the wells and their related facilities have not been examined nor have the wells been tested by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. Possible environmental liability related to the properties has not been investigated nor considered. The cost of plugging and the salvage value of equipment at abandonment has been included in this evaluation, as provided by the Company.

Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. is a Texas Registered Engineering Firm (F-693), made up of independent registered professional engineers and geologists that have provided petroleum consulting services to the oil and gas industry for over 60 years. This evaluation was supervised by W. Todd Brooker, President at Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. and a State of Texas Licensed Professional Engineer (License #83462). We do not own an interest in the properties, Crescent Energy Company or its subsidiaries and are not employed on a contingent basis. We have used all methods and procedures that we consider necessary under the circumstances to prepare this report. Our work-papers and related data utilized in the preparation of these estimates are available in our office.


Crescent Energy Company Interests

January 13, 2022

Page 4

 

Yours very truly,
/s/ W. Todd Brooker, P.E. LOGO
W. Todd Brooker, P.E.
President
CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-693


Crescent Energy Company Interests

January 13, 2022

Page 5

 

APPENDIX

Methods Employed in the Estimation of Reserves

The four methods customarily employed in the estimation of reserves are (1) production performance, (2) material balance, (3) volumetric and (4) analogy. Most estimates, although based primarily on one method, utilize other methods depending on the nature and extent of the data available and the characteristics of the reservoirs.

Basic information includes production, pressure, geological and laboratory data. However, a large variation exists in the quality, quantity and types of information available on individual properties. Operators are generally required by regulatory authorities to file monthly production reports and may be required to measure and report periodically such data as well pressures, gas-oil ratios, well tests, etc. As a general rule, an operator has complete discretion in obtaining and/or making available geological and engineering data. The resulting lack of uniformity in data renders impossible the application of identical methods to all properties, and may result in significant differences in the accuracy and reliability of estimates.

A brief discussion of each method, its basis, data requirements, applicability and generalization as to its relative degree of accuracy follows:

Production performance. This method employs graphical analyses of production data on the premise that all factors which have controlled the performance to date will continue to control and that historical trends can be extrapolated to predict future performance. The only information required is production history. Capacity production can usually be analyzed from graphs of rates versus time or cumulative production. This procedure is referred to as “decline curve” analysis. Both capacity and restricted production can, in some cases, be analyzed from graphs of producing rate relationships of the various production components. Reserve estimates obtained by this method are generally considered to have a relatively high degree of accuracy with the degree of accuracy increasing as production history accumulates.

Material balance. This method employs the analysis of the relationship of production and pressure performance on the premise that the reservoir volume and its initial hydrocarbon content are fixed and that this initial hydrocarbon volume and recoveries therefrom can be estimated by analyzing changes in pressure with respect to production relationships. This method requires reliable pressure and temperature data, production data, fluid analyses and knowledge of the nature of the reservoir. The material balance method is applicable to all reservoirs, but the time and expense required for its use is dependent on the nature of the reservoir and its fluids. Reserves for depletion type reservoirs can be estimated from graphs of pressures corrected for compressibility versus cumulative production, requiring only data that are usually available. Estimates for other reservoir types require extensive data and involve complex calculations most suited to computer models which makes this method generally applicable only to reservoirs where there is economic justification for its use. Reserve estimates obtained by this method are generally considered to have a degree of accuracy that is directly related to the complexity of the reservoir and the quality and quantity of data available.

Volumetric. This method employs analyses of physical measurements of rock and fluid properties to calculate the volume of hydrocarbons in-place. The data required are well information sufficient to determine reservoir subsurface datum, thickness, storage volume, fluid content and location. The volumetric method is most applicable to reservoirs which are not susceptible to analysis by production performance or material balance methods. These are most commonly newly developed and/or no-pressure depleting reservoirs. The amount of hydrocarbons in-place that can be recovered is not an integral part of the volumetric calculations but is an estimate inferred by other methods and a knowledge of the nature of the reservoir. Reserve estimates obtained by this method are generally considered to have a low degree of accuracy; but the degree of accuracy can be relatively high where rock quality and subsurface control is good and the nature of the reservoir is uncomplicated.

Analogy. This method, which employs experience and judgment to estimate reserves, is based on observations of similar situations and includes consideration of theoretical performance. The analogy method is a common approach used for “resource plays,” where an abundance of wells with similar production profiles facilitates the reliable estimation of future reserves with a relatively high degree of accuracy. The analogy method may also be applicable where the data are insufficient or so inconclusive that reliable reserve estimates cannot be made by other methods. Reserve estimates obtained in this manner are generally considered to have a relatively low degree of accuracy.

Much of the information used in the estimation of reserves is itself arrived at by the use of estimates. These estimates are subject to continuing change as additional information becomes available. Reserve estimates which presently appear to be correct may be found to contain substantial errors as time passes and new information is obtained about well and reservoir performance.


Crescent Energy Company Interests

January 13, 2022

Page 6

 

APPENDIX

Reserve Definitions and Classifications

The Securities and Exchange Commission, in SX Reg. 210.4-10 dated November 18, 1981, as amended on September 19, 1989 and January 1, 2010, requires adherence to the following definitions of oil and gas reserves:

“(22) Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations— prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

“(i) The area of a reservoir considered as proved includes: (A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and (B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

“(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

“(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

“(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when: (A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and (B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

“(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

“(6) Developed oil and gas reserves. Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

“(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and

“(ii) Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

“(31) Undeveloped oil and gas reserves. Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

“(i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.

“(ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time.

“(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.


Crescent Energy Company Interests

January 13, 2022

Page 7

 

“(18) Probable reserves. Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.

“(i) When deterministic methods are used, it is as likely as not that actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50% probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable reserves estimates.

“(ii) Probable reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to proved reserves where data control or interpretations of available data are less certain, even if the interpreted reservoir continuity of structure or productivity does not meet the reasonable certainty criterion. Probable reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

“(iii) Probable reserves estimates also include potential incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than assumed for proved reserves.

“(iv) See also guidelines in paragraphs (17)(iv) and (17)(vi) of this section (below).

“(17) Possible reserves. Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves.

“(i) When deterministic methods are used, the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10% probability that the total quantities ultimately recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates.

“(ii) Possible reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to probable reserves where data control and interpretations of available data are progressively less certain. Frequently, this will be in areas where geoscience and engineering data are unable to define clearly the area and vertical limits of commercial production from the reservoir by a defined project.

“(iii) Possible reserves also include incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than the recovery quantities assumed for probable reserves.

“(iv) The proved plus probable and proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates must be based on reasonable alternative technical and commercial interpretations within the reservoir or subject project that are clearly documented, including comparisons to results in successful similar projects.

“(v) Possible reserves may be assigned where geoscience and engineering data identify directly adjacent portions of a reservoir within the same accumulation that may be separated from proved areas by faults with displacement less than formation thickness or other geological discontinuities and that have not been penetrated by a wellbore, and the registrant believes that such adjacent portions are in communication with the known (proved) reservoir. Possible reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher or lower than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

“(vi) Pursuant to paragraph (22)(iii) of this section (above), where direct observation has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves should be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir above the HKO only if the higher contact can be established with reasonable certainty through reliable technology. Portions of the reservoir that do not meet this reasonable certainty criterion may be assigned as probable and possible oil or gas based on reservoir fluid properties and pressure gradient interpretations.”

Instruction 4 of Item 2(b) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K was revised January 1, 2010 to state that “a registrant engaged in oil and gas producing activities shall provide the information required by Subpart 1200 of Regulation S–K.” This is relevant in that Instruction 2 to paragraph (a)(2) states: “The registrant is permitted, but not required, to disclose probable or possible reserves pursuant to paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) through (a)(2)(vii) of this Item.”

“(26) Reserves. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.

“Note to paragraph (26): Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir (i.e., absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources (i.e., potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).”

Exhibit 99.5

 

LOGO

 

Mr. Brett Knight

Director, Corporate Reserves

Crescent Energy Company

600 Travis Street, Suite 7200

Houston, TX 77002

      Dallas, January 20, 2022

Dear Mr. Knight:

In accordance with your request, William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. (Cobb & Associates) has estimated the proved reserves and future income as of January 1, 2022, attributable to the Crescent Energy Company and its subsidiaries (Crescent) interests in certain hydrocarbon-producing properties located in Kansas, Louisiana, state and federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming. This report is based on unescalated prices and costs in accordance with the guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This evaluation was completed on January 20, 2022.

Reserves presented in this report are classified as proved and are further categorized as Proved Developed Producing (PDP), Proved Developed Not Producing (PDNP), Proved Developed Shut-In (PDSI) and Proved Un-Developed (PUD). Table 1 summarizes our estimate of the proved oil and gas reserves and their pre-federal income tax value undiscounted and discounted at ten percent using the year-end 2021 SEC price.

TABLE 1

CRESCENT ENERGY COMPANY

CRESCENT ENERGY COMPANY PROPERTIES

RESERVES AND CASH FLOW SUMMARY AS OF JANUARY 1,2022

YEAR-END 2021 SEC PRICE

 

     Net Reserves      Future Net Cash Flow  

Reserves Category

   Oil      Gas      NGL      Oil Equiv.      Undiscounted      Discounted @
10% per Year
 
     (MBBL)      (MMcf)      (MBBL)      (MBOE)      (M$)      (M$)  

Proved Developed

     43,876        438,632        11,734        128,715        1,945,486        1,115,886  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

PDP—Producing

     42,444        438,391        11,678        127,187        1,873,120        1,072,252  

PDNP—Non Producing

     1,432        241        56        1,527        72,366        43,634  

PDSI—Shut-In

     0        0        0        0        0        0  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Proved Undeveloped

     1,340        286        40        1,427        63,210        34,604  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

PUD—Undeveloped

     1,340        286        40        1,427        63,210        34,604  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

TOTAL PROVED

     45,215        438,919        11,773        130,142        2,008,696-        1,150,490  


LOGO

 

Values shown were determined utilizing constant oil and gas prices and well operating expenses. The discounted net present values of future income shown in Table 1 are not intended to represent an estimate of fair market value. These estimates were prepared in accordance with the definitions and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, with the exception of the exclusion of future income taxes, conform to the FASB Accounting Standards Certification Topic 932, Extraction Activities – Oil and Gas.

Oil and NGL volumes are expressed in thousand stock tank barrels (MBBL). A stock tank barrel is equivalent to 42 United States gallons. Gas volumes are expressed in million standard cubic feet (MMcf) as determined at 60° Fahrenheit and the legal pressure base for the specific location of the gas reserves.

Cobb & Associates reviewed 100 per cent of the properties included in this report. This report, which was prepared for Crescent’s use in filing with the SEC and will be filed with Crescent’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 (the “Form 10-K”) and covers 22 percent of the total company present value discounted at ten percent (PV10) presented in Crescent’s Form 10-K. All assumptions, data, methods, and procedures considered necessary and appropriate were used to prepare this report.

DISCUSSION

The Crescent Energy Company properties are divided into four regions: Midcontinent, Permian, Rockies and Other. Cobb & Associates have reviewed 100% of the properties contained in this report, which constitutes 24% of the total proved reserves and 22% of the total Net Present Value for Crescent Energy Company.

The region with the largest net present value is the Rockies, which account for 42.6% of the total value. The Rockies region consists of properties in Montana and Wyoming. 35.9% of the total value is made up by the Midcontinent region and consists of properties in Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas. The Permian region makes up 20.4% of the total value from properties New Mexico and Texas. The remaining 1.0% of the total value comes from the Other region with properties in state and federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

Reserve estimates were prepared using generally accepted petroleum engineering principles and practices. The method, or combination of methods, utilized in the study of each property or reservoir included an assessment of the stage of reservoir development, quality of data, and length of production history. Geologic and engineering data was obtained from Crescent, public sources, and the non-confidential files of Cobb & Associates.

Performance data through September 2021 was used to forecast reserves for all producing properties where available. Reserve classification was based on the status of each well as of January 1, 2022 for operated wells, and on the most recently available information for non-operated wells.

For most regions in the report, the PDP reserve estimates were based on decline curve analysis. Some of the properties have produced for only a short period of time and did not exhibit an identifiable performance decline trend. In these cases, reserve estimates were based primarily on geological interpretation, mapping, and analogy to offset producers. Past performance, and offsetting performance data were used to estimate behind pipe and undeveloped reserves. Fields where additional analysis or methodology was used for the reserve assignments are discussed in more detail. These fields include Eugene Island 11 and the Big Horn or Madden Deep gas field in Wyoming.


LOGO

 

Offshore—Eugene Island 11

Eugene Island 11 is located in federal and Louisiana state waters of the Gulf of Mexico, at a water depth of approximately 13 feet. Production is primarily from a single CibOp sand, the JRM-1 sand, at a depth of approximately 15,000 feet. The field was discovered in September, 2006 by Crescent Energy Company’s Dutch 1 well. Crescent has since drilled four more wells, the Dutch 2, 3, 4 and 5, on Federal acreage. The Dutch 5 well is depleted and was abandoned in December 2021.

Crescent also has properties in Louisiana state waters in this field. These properties are referred to as the Mary Rose prospect. Five Mary Rose wells have been drilled to date. Four Mary Rose wells, numbers 1 through 4, have produced from the main CibOp sand. The Mary Rose 4 well is depleted and has been abandoned. The Mary Rose 3 is also depleted, with abandonment scheduled for May 2023.

The Mary Rose 5 well produced from a separate, and much smaller, CibOp reservoir that is now depleted. Abandonment of the Mary Rose 5 was completed in 2019.

Proved reserves for the Eugene Island 10 main CibOp sand are based on analysis of historical rate versus time decline curves and P/Z performance plots, supplemented by volumetric calculations of original-gas-in-place (OGIP) using all available well log and 3D seismic data. The reservoir has been effectively drilled to the lowest structural datum and no significant aquifer has been found. Performance to date indicates a depletion drive system.

All Dutch and Mary Rose wells now flow to compression on the ‘H’ platform, allowing for a decrease in producing flowing tubing pressures. This two-stage compression lowers line pressure to approximately 200 psi. There are no remaining capital or startup costs for compression on the ‘H’ platform. Abandonment costs were provided by Crescent and scheduled at the end-of-project life for all wells and the ‘H’ platform.

The Mary Rose 1 well suffered a failure during 2021. Well investigation work indicate that there is not an easy fix to bring the well back online. Should it be impossible to develop a cost effective method to recover the production capacity lost from Mary Rose 1, it will likely bring forward the abandonment of the entire field. For this report, it has been assumed that the Mary Rose 1 is permanently lost and that none of the other wells will be increasing their production as a result of Mary Rose 1 no longer producing.

Big Horn / Madden Deep Gas Field

The Madden Deep reservoir is located in the Wind River Basin in Wyoming and was discovered and developed by Burlington Resources in the early 1990s. The reservoir is a fractured dolomitized limestone with around 200 feet of net pay. The structure is a fault bounded, three way dip structure with a total closure of around 1,500 feet. The average reservoir permeability is 1-10 mD with high permeability streaks around 100 mD. The reservoir as well as the reservoir fluids are challenging, the reservoir is located at a depth of around 25,000 feet and the reservoir temperature is 435 degrees Fahrenheit. The gas in the reservoir consists of 67.4% methane, 20% CO2 and 12.6% H2S. None of the 9 wells penetrating the reservoir have tagged the gas water contact (GWC), so there is some uncertainty about the exact location of the GWC.


LOGO

 

Conoco Phillips purchased the Asset from Burlington Resources in 2006 and owned it until it was purchased by Crescent in 2021.

The Gas in place for the field have been assessed using all available seismic data, static and dynamic well data. Three models have been constructed to model field performance:

 

  1)

1 A Material Balance, Nodal Analysis, Surface Network model. The material balance portion of this model includes a detailed and history matched P/Z model using the measured P/Z data from the individual wells in the field.

 

  2)

A reservoir simulation model has been constructed and history matched and

 

  3)

A rate versus cumulative gas produced well by well production forecasting model.

The Gas Initially In Place numbers from the material balance and simulation models match well. The forecast used in the reserve report was taken from the rate versus cumulative gas model as this was best able to describe the production when one of the processing trains will be decommissioned in one of the coming years and the field experience higher deliverability than there is available processing capacity.

OIL AND GAS PRICING

Projections of proved reserves contained in this report utilize constant product prices of $65.56 per barrel of oil and $3.598 per MMBTU of gas. These are the so called SEC prices, which are the average first-of-the-month prices for the prior 12-month period for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil and Henry Hub gas. Appropriate oil and gas pricing differentials, residue gas shrink, NGL yields, and NGL pricing as a fraction of WTI were calculated for each field using 12 months of revenue data where available. After applying appropriate differentials for each property, the weighted average realized product prices for 2021 were $63.87 per barrel of oil and $3.321 per MCF of gas, resulting in average 2021 differentials of negative $1.69 per barrel of oil and negative $0.277 per MCF of gas.

OPERATING COSTS

Future operating costs for each of the Crescent wells are held constant at current values for the life of the property. These costs were calculated using 12-month lease operating expense (LOE) statements provided by Crescent. In general, the LOE statements for each of the properties were analyzed by production area. LOE data was available for most areas through August 2021. In general, each well was assigned a fixed monthly operating cost, variable costs for oil and gas, and water handling costs per barrel of water produced. Oil, gas and NGL transportation and processing fees were also assigned to each well by area using net revenue data in a similar manner that product differentials were determined.

LOE data for the Eugene Island 11 properties was analyzed by cost centre. Fixed operating costs were divided into three categories: producing well, non-producing well and platform expenses. Non-producing wells are wells that are no longer producing and awaiting abandonment in 2022 or beyond and had costs attributable to insurance. Platform expenses include shared compression equipment rental and operating costs, pipeline costs, and other costs that were assigned to platform cost centers.


LOGO

 

CAPITAL & ABANDONMENT COSTS

Capital expenditures to recomplete behind-pipe zones in existing wells, re-activate or work over existing wells, drill new wells and install production facilities were provided by Crescent and appear to be reasonable.

Abandonment costs for Eugene Island 11 were included for each well and the platform expense case as it was supplied to Cobb & Associates by Crescent. Cobb & Associates have not done a field visit or in any other way attempted to verify the abandonment estimates apart from determining that the numbers looked reasonable.

Abandonment costs for all other properties in the report were been included by area. Yearly estimates of abandonment costs and equipment salvage values were scheduled based on current well status and life estimations.

PROFESSIONAL GUIDELINES

Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years, from known reservoirs under expected economic and operating conditions. Reserves are considered proved if economic productivity is supported by either actual production or conclusive formation tests.

Probable reserves are those additional reserves which analysis of geoscience and engineering data indicate are less likely to be recovered than proved reserves, but more certain to be recovered than possible reserves. Possible reserves are those additional reserves which analysis of geoscience and engineering data suggest are less likely to be recoverable than probable reserves.

The reserve estimates shown in this report are those estimated to be recoverable in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4-10(a) (1)-(32) of Regulation S-X and the guidelines specified in Item 1202 (a)(8) of Regulation S-K of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and with the exception of the exclusion of future income taxes, conforms to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Industries—Oil and Gas. The definitions for oil and gas reserves in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X are set forth in this report.

The reserves included in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as being exact quantities. Governmental policies, uncertainties of supply and demand, the prices actually received for the reserves, and the costs incurred in recovering such reserves, may vary from the price and cost assumptions in this report. Estimated reserves using price escalations may vary from values obtained using constant price scenarios. In any case, estimates of reserves, resources, and revenues may increase or decrease as a result of future operations.

Cobb & Associates has not examined titles to the appraised properties nor has the actual degree of interest owned been independently confirmed. The data used in this evaluation were obtained from Crescent Energy Company and the non-confidential files of Cobb & Associates and were considered accurate.

We have not made a field examination of the Crescent properties. Therefore, operating ability and condition of the production equipment have not been considered. Also, environmental liabilities, if any, caused by Crescent or any other operator have not been considered, nor has the cost to restore the property to acceptable conditions, as may be required by regulation, been taken into account.


LOGO

 

In evaluating available information concerning this appraisal, Cobb & Associates has excluded from its consideration all matters as to which legal or accounting interpretation, rather than engineering, may be controlling. As in all aspects of oil and gas evaluation, there are uncertainties inherent in the interpretation of engineering data and conclusions necessarily represent only informed professional judgments.

William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. is an independent consulting firm founded in 1983. Its compensation is not contingent on the results obtained or reported. Frank J. Marek, a Registered Texas Professional Engineer and a senior technical advisor of William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc., is primarily responsible for overseeing the preparation of the reserve report. His professional qualifications meet or exceed the qualifications of reserve estimators set forth in the “Standards Pertaining to Estimation and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information” promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers. His qualifications include: Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University 1977; member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers; member of the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers; and over 40 years of experience in estimating and evaluating reserve information and estimating and evaluating reserves.

William M. Cobb & Associates, Inc. appreciate the opportunity to be of service to Crescent Energy Company on this project. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report.

 

Sincerely,

WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-84

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Exhibit 99.6

 

LOGO      

750 N St Paul St.

Suite 1750

Dallas, Texas 75201

Phone (214) 754-7090

January 31, 2022

Mr. Brett Knight

Director, Corporate Reserves

Crescent Energy Company

600 Travis Street, Suite 7200

Houston, Texas 77022

Mr. Knight:

As requested, Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Haas Engineering”) has performed an Audit of the provided economics and databases prepared by Crescent Energy Company (hereinafter referred to as “Crescent”), as of December 31, 2021. The properties contained in this Audit are the Gardendale, Newark, and Renee areas, which are located in Texas and Wyoming. These areas have been combined into a single report, at the request of Crescent. Production data was generally available through August 31, 2021. It is the understanding of Haas Engineering that this evaluation comprises approximately 34% of the Proved Reserves of Crescent.

Haas Engineering has completed this audit in accordance with the definitions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a). This estimate of Reserves was completed on or about the date of this report. This report has been prepared for the purposes of Crescent’s SEC filing. It is Haas Engineering’s opinion that the assumptions, data, methods, and procedures used in the preparation of this report are appropriate for this purpose. As of December 31, 2021, Crescent’s net Reserves, future net income (“FNI”), and net present worth discounted at 10 percent per annum (“NPV”) have been estimated to be as follows:

TABLE 1

     As of 12/31/2021         
     Net Reserves      Sales Volumes         
     Oil &      Wet
Gas

(Mcf)
            Residue
Gas
(Mcf)
            NPV  
     Condensate      NGL      FNI      Disc. @ 10%  

Reserve Class/Cat

   (bbl)      (bbl)      ($)      ($)  

Proved Producing

     36,849,153        662,589,450        21,599,062        593,726,063        1,667,635,376        948,673,440  

Proved Non-Producing

     4,658,952        76,291,127        1,221,794        70,801,026        281,281,613        121,575,999  

Proved Undeveloped

     4,372,374        2,517,986        309,712        1,699,640        159,535,376        70,982,260  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Proved

     45,880,479        741,398,563        23,130,568        666,226,729        2,108,452,365        1,141,231,699  

 

*

Totals in Table 1 may not exactly match values in the attached cash flow summaries and tabular summaries due to computer rounding.

In this unqualified audit of Crescent’s Reserves, Haas Engineering noted some variances from our internal estimations including forecast differences, price adjustments, taxes, recoveries, and operating expenses. However, these differences, in aggregate, did not exceed the 10 percent tolerance of auditing standards.

It is the opinion of Haas Engineering that the Reserves, FNI, and NPV estimates listed in Table 1 are, in the aggregate, reasonable and meet Audit standards for the top 80% of value in the portfolio. FNI is after deducting estimated operating and future development costs, severance and ad valorem taxes, but before Federal income taxes. Total net Proved Reserves are defined as those natural gas and hydrocarbon liquid Reserves to Crescent’s interests after deducting all royalties, overriding royalties, and reversionary interests owned by outside parties that become effective upon payout of specified monetary balances. All Reserves estimates have been prepared using standard engineering practices generally accepted by


the petroleum industry and conform to guidelines developed and adopted by the SEC. All hydrocarbon liquid Reserves are expressed in United States barrels (“bbl”) of 42 gallons. Natural gas Reserves are expressed in thousand standard cubic feet (“Mcf”) at the contractual pressure and temperature bases and include shrinkage adjustment related to field and plant losses.

RESERVES ESTIMATE METHODOLOGY

It is the opinion of Haas Engineering that the Reserves estimates contained in this report have been prepared using standard engineering practices generally accepted by the petroleum industry. Decline curve analysis was used to estimate the remaining Reserves of pressure depletion reservoirs with enough historical production data to establish decline trends. Reservoirs under non-pressure depletion drive mechanisms and non-producing Reserves were estimated by volumetric analysis, research of analogous reservoirs, probabilistic methods, or a combination of methods. The appropriate methodology was used, as deemed necessary, to estimate Reserves in conformance with SEC regulations. The maximum remaining Reserves life assigned to wells included in this report is 48 years for Gardendale, 50 years for Newark, and 39 years for Renee. This report does not include any gas sales imbalances.

RESERVES CLASSIFICATION

It is the opinion of Haas Engineering that the Reserves estimates contained in this report conform to guidelines specified by the SEC. For more information regarding Reserves classification definitions see Appendix A. A complete discussion of the Reserves classification definitions can be found on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission website (www.sec.gov). It should be noted that this evaluation contains cases with negative FNI, due to the inclusion of abandonment costs, or expense modeling (G&A, expense capital, etc.). All volumes are related to commercial production.

The SEC requires a development plan be in place for these assets. This Audit report defines a budget for that development plan, but Haas Engineering makes no representation about the company’s ability to fund this development. All Proved Undeveloped (“PUD”) locations are developed within 5 years. Please note that, as of the effective date of this report, no wells were being drilled, completed, or are waiting on completion.

COMMODITY PRICES

It is the opinion of Haas Engineering that, pursuant to SEC guidelines, the cash flow projections in this report utilize the unweighted 12-month arithmetic average of the first-day-of month benchmark prices for January 2021 through December 2021. The benchmark price for natural gas is taken to be the price received at Henry Hub and the benchmark price for hydrocarbon liquids is taken to be the price received for West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude oil at the Cushing, OK sales point.

The unweighted arithmetic average cash market price for natural gas delivered at Henry Hub during this time period is $3.598 per MMBTU. The Henry Hub price was held constant throughout the life of the wells and is adjusted for BTU content, basis differentials, and marketing costs, resulting in a weighted average net price of $3.33 per Mcf for Gardendale, $3.44 per Mcf for Newark, and $3.27 per Mcf for Renee. Please note that transportation costs for natural gas have been included as expense.

The unweighted arithmetic average cash market price for WTI crude oil sold at Cushing, OK during this time period is $66.56 per bbl. For natural gas liquids (“NGL”), the WTI crude oil price was held constant throughout the life of the wells and is adjusted for BTU content, plant processing fees and basis differentials, resulting in a weighted average net price of $28.62 per bbl for Gardendale, $23.97 per bbl for Newark, $31.50 per bbl for Renee. For crude oil, the WTI crude oil price was held constant throughout the life of the wells and is adjusted for crude quality, marketing fees, BS&W, transportation costs, purchaser bonuses and basis differentials, resulting in a weighted average net price of $66.16 per bbl for Gardendale, $63.85 per bbl for Newark, and $66.02 per bbl for Renee.


Summary level revenue accounting data for the period of August 1, 2020 through July 31, 2021 was generally used in this evaluation. The pricing adjustments were provided by Crescent and reviewed for the top 80 percent of the NPV. Haas Engineering verified the reasonableness of Crescent’s pricing models and differentials using accounting data furnished by Crescent.

OPERATING EXPENSES & CAPITAL COSTS

It is the opinion of Haas Engineering that, in most cases, the lease operating costs used in this evaluation represent the average of recent historical monthly operating costs. In cases where historical costs were not available or deemed to be unreliable, operating costs were estimated based on knowledge of analogous wells producing under similar conditions. The lease operating expenses in this report represent field level operating costs and do not include COPAS charges for operated properties.

It is the opinion of Haas Engineering that capital costs were estimated using recent historical information reported for analogous expenditures. Where recent historical information was not available, Authority for Expenditure (“AFE”) documents, or supplemental documentation was provided by the operator and used to estimate capital costs. AFE and supplemental documents provided by the operator have been checked for reasonableness. It should also be understood that abandonment costs have been included at both the field and well level. The abandonment costs used are Crescent’s estimates of the costs to abandon the wells and production facilities, net of salvage value, and have been reviewed for reasonableness.

Operating expenses for the period of August 1, 2020 through July 31, 2021 was generally used in this evaluation. Operating expenses, capital costs, and abandonment costs were not escalated in this evaluation.

DISCLAIMERS

In this unqualified audit of Crescent’s Reserves, Haas Engineering noted some variances from our internal estimations including forecast differences, price adjustments, taxes, recoveries, and operating expenses. However, these differences, in aggregate, did not exceed the 10 percent tolerance of auditing standards.

It should also be clear that abandonment costs have been included at the field and well level. The abandonment costs used are Crescent’s estimates of the costs to abandon the wells and production facilities, net of salvage value, and have been reviewed for reasonableness.

The Proved Reserves presented in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as being exact quantities. They may or may not be actually recovered; and, if recovered, the revenues therefrom and the actual costs related thereto could be more or less than the estimated amounts. Because of governmental policies and uncertainties of supply and demand, the product prices and the costs incurred in recovering these Reserves may vary from the price and cost assumptions in this report. Because these estimates are based on existing governmental regulations, changes could affect the ability to recover these Reserves. In any case, quantities of Reserves may increase or decrease as a result of future operations.

Reserves estimates for individual properties included in this report are only valid when considered within the context of the overall report and should not be considered independently. The future net income and net present value estimates contained in this report do not represent an estimate of fair market value.


All information pertaining to the operating expenses, prices, and the interests of Crescent in the properties appraised has been accepted as represented. It was not considered necessary to make a field examination of the appraised properties. Data used in performing this appraisal were obtained from Crescent, public sources, and our own files. Supporting work papers pertinent to the appraisal are retained in our files and are available to you or designated parties at your convenience.

It was beyond the scope of this Haas Engineering report to evaluate the potential environmental liability costs from the operation and abandonment of these properties. In addition, no evaluation was made to determine the degree of operator compliance with current environmental rules, regulations, and reporting requirements. Therefore, no estimate of the potential economic liability, if any, from environmental concerns is included in the forecasts presented herein.

The technical persons primarily responsible for conducting this Audit meets the requirements regarding qualifications, independence, objectivity, and confidentiality, as defined by the SPE Standards. Michael A. Link, a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, has been practicing consulting petroleum engineering at Haas Engineering since 2015 and has over 20 years of industry experience. Franklin Stagg, a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, has been practicing consulting petroleum engineering at Haas Engineering since 2016 and has over 7 years of industry experience.

Haas Engineering is independent with respect to Crescent as provided in the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Attached are summary tables of economic analysis of predicted future performance. Other tables identify the properties appraised with summary Reserves and the economic factors applicable to each. A list of tables is included.

We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service and hope that this report will fulfill your requirements.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows.]    


Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc.
F-0002950

 

/s/ Michael A. Link, P.E.
Michael A. Link, P.E.
January 31, 2022

 

/s/ Franklin W. Stagg, P.E.
Franklin W. Stagg, P.E.
January 31, 2022


Appendix A

Definitions of Oil and Gas Reserves—Securities and Exchange Commission

The list of definitions below were compiled by HPESI. They represent selected definitions from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Rule 4-10 document. This document was amended on January 14, 2009, and the definitions below reflect the changes resulting from the amendment. Comprehensive versions of Rule 4-10 and the amendments to Rule 4-10 can be obtained online at https://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/secg/oilgasreporting-secg.htm

 

  (a)

Definitions. The following definitions apply to the terms listed below as they are used in this section:

 

  (1)

Developed oil and gas reserves. Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

 

  (i)

Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and

 

  (ii)

Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

 

  (2)

Possible reserves. Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves.

 

  (i)

When deterministic methods are used, the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10% probability that the total quantities ultimately recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates.

 

  (ii)

Possible reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to probable reserves where data control and interpretations of available data are progressively less certain. Frequently, this will be in areas where geoscience and engineering data are unable to define clearly the area and vertical limits of commercial production from the reservoir by a defined project.

 

  (iii)

Possible reserves also include incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than the recovery quantities assumed for probable reserves.

 

  (iv)

The proved plus probable and proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates must be based on reasonable alternative technical and commercial interpretations within the reservoir or subject project that are clearly documented, including comparisons to results in successful similar projects.

 

  (v)

Possible reserves may be assigned where geoscience and engineering data identify directly adjacent portions of a reservoir within the same accumulation that may be separated from proved areas by faults with displacement less than formation thickness or other geological discontinuities and that have not been penetrated by a wellbore, and the registrant believes that such adjacent portions are in communication with the known (proved) reservoir. Possible reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher or lower than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

 

  (vi)

Pursuant to paragraph (a)(22)(iii) of this section, where direct observation has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves should be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir above the HKO only if the higher contact can be established with reasonable certainty through reliable technology. Portions of the reservoir that do not meet this reasonable certainty criterion may be assigned as probable and possible oil or gas based on reservoir fluid properties and pressure gradient interpretations.

 

  (3)

Probable reserves. Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.

 

  (i)

When deterministic methods are used, it is as likely as not that actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50% probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable reserves estimates.

 

  (ii)

Probable reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to proved reserves where data control or interpretations of available data are less certain, even if the interpreted reservoir continuity of structure or productivity does not meet the reasonable certainty criterion. Probable reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.


Appendix A

Definitions of Oil and Gas Reserves—Securities and Exchange Commission

 

  (iii)

Probable reserves estimates also include potential incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than assumed for proved reserves.

 

  (iv)

See also guidelines in paragraphs (a)(17)(iv) and (a)(17)(vi) of this section.

 

  (4)

Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

 

  (i)

The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:

 

  (A)

The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and

 

  (B)

Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

 

  (ii)

In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

 

  (iii)

Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil(HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

 

  (iv)

Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:

 

  (A)

Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and

 

  (B)

The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

 

  (v)

Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

 

  (5)

Reasonable certainty. If deterministic methods are used, reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the estimate. A high degree of confidence exists if the quantity is much more likely to be achieved than not, and, as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical), engineering, and economic data are made to estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time, reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease.

 

  (6)

Reliable technology. Reliable technology is a grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods) that has been field tested and has been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation.


Appendix A

Definitions of Oil and Gas Reserves—Securities and Exchange Commission

 

  (7)

Reserves. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.

Note to paragraph (a)(26): Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir ( i.e. , absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources ( i.e. , potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).

 

  (8)

Undeveloped oil and gas reserves. Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

 

  (i)

Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.

 

  (ii)

Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time.

 

  (iii)

Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.