|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
||
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date of event requiring this shell company report
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from to .
|
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
Number of Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Filer ☐
|
Non-accelerated Filer ☐
|
|
Emerging Growth Company
|
|
|
|
☐
|
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
☒
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐
|
Other
|

|
PART I |
Page | |
|
1 | ||
|
1 | ||
|
1 | ||
| 34 |
||
| 189 |
||
|
190 | ||
|
221 | ||
|
256 | ||
| 266 |
||
| 270 | ||
| 271 |
||
| 280 |
||
| 287 |
||
|
PART II |
||
| 287 |
||
|
288 | ||
| 288 |
||
| 289 |
||
| 289 | ||
| 290 |
||
| 290 |
||
| 290 |
||
| 291 |
||
| 291 |
||
| 292 | ||
| 292 | ||
| 293 |
||
| 293 | ||
| 294 | ||
| 294 | ||
| 294 | ||
| 295 |
||
|
F-1 |
|
Bromine |
A chemical element used as a basis for a wide variety of
uses and compounds, and mainly as a component in flame retardants or fire prevention substances. Unless otherwise stated, the term “bromine”
refers to elemental bromine. |
|
CDP |
Carbon Disclosure Project – A leading non-profit organization
in the greenhouse gas emissions reporting field. |
|
CFR |
Cost and Freight. In a CFR transaction, the prices of goods
to a customer include, in addition to FOB expenses, marine shipping costs and all other costs that arise after the goods leave the seller’s
factory gates and up to the destination port. |
|
CLP |
Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and
Mixtures– EU regulation. |
|
CPI |
The Consumer Price Index, as published by Israeli's Central
Bureau of Statistics. |
|
CRU |
Intelligence Company that provides information on global
mining, metal and fertilizers market. |
|
ICL ADS |
ICL América do Sul (formerly Compass Minerals América
do Sul S.A.). |
|
Dead Sea Bromine |
Dead Sea Bromine Ltd., a subsidiary in the Industrial Products
segment. |
|
MAP |
Monoammonium Phosphate, a fertilizer containing nitrate and
phosphorus oxide. |
|
GTSP |
Granular Triple Superphosphate, used as fertilizer, a source
of high phosphorus. |
|
GSSP |
Granular Single Superphosphate, used as a phosphate fertilizer.
|
|
Green Hydrogen |
Hydrogen produced by splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen
using renewable electricity. |
|
DAP |
Diammonium Phosphate - a fertilizer containing nitrate and
phosphorus oxide. |
|
EPA |
US Environmental Protection Agency. |
|
EU |
European Union. |
|
FAO |
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
|
|
FOB |
Free on-Board expenses are expenses for overland transportation,
loading costs and other costs, up to and including the port of origin. In a FOB transaction, the seller pays the FOB expenses, and the
buyer pays the other costs from the port of origin onwards. |
|
CPT |
Cost Per Tonne. |
|
CIF
|
Cost, Insurance, and Freight. In a CIF transaction, the price
of goods includes, as well as FOB expenses, the expenses for insurance, shipping and any other costs that arise after the goods leave
the factory gates and up to the destination port. |
|
ICL Haifa (Fertilizers & Chemicals) |
Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., a subsidiary in the Growing
Solutions segment. |
|
GHG |
Greenhouse Gases – air emissions contributing to climate
change. |
|
Granular |
Fertilizer containing granular particles. |
|
ICL Boulby |
A UK subsidiary in the Potash segment. |
|
ICL Iberia (Iberpotash) |
Iberpotash S.A., a Spanish subsidiary in the Potash
segment. |
|
IC |
Israel Corporation Ltd. |
|
Indicated Mineral Resource |
That part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade
or quality are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with
an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support mine
planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because an indicated mineral resource has a lower level of confidence
than the level of confidence of a measured mineral resource, an indicated mineral resource may only be converted to a probable mineral
reserve. |
|
Inferred Mineral Resource |
That part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade
or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological uncertainty associated with
an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic
extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Because an inferred mineral resource has the lowest level of geological
confidence of all mineral resources, which prevents the application of the modifying factors in a manner useful for evaluation of economic
viability, an inferred mineral resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project and may not be
converted to a mineral reserve. |
|
DSW |
Dead Sea Works Ltd., a subsidiary in the Potash segment.
|
|
DSM |
Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd., a subsidiary in the Potash
segment. |
|
ICL Neot Hovav |
Subsidiaries in the Neot Hovav area in the south of Israel,
including facilities of Bromine Compounds Ltd included in the Industrial Products segment. |
|
ICL Rotem |
Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd., a subsidiary in the Phosphate
Solutions segment. |
|
IFA |
The International Fertilizers Industry Association, an international
association of fertilizers manufacturers. |
|
ILA |
Israel Land Authority. |
|
IMF |
International Monetary Fund. |
|
K |
The element potassium, one of three main plant nutrients.
|
|
KNO3
|
Potassium Nitrate, a soluble fertilizer containing N&P
used as a stand-alone product or as a key component of some water-soluble blends. |
|
KOH |
Potassium hydroxide 50% liquid. |
|
MGA |
Merchant grade phosphoric acid. |
|
Measured Mineral Resource |
That part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade
or quality are estimated and based on conclusive geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with a
measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors, as defined in this section, in sufficient
detail to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because a measured mineral resource
has a higher level of confidence than the level of confidence of either an indicated mineral resource or an inferred mineral resource,
a measured mineral resource may be converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral reserve. |
|
Mineral Reserve |
An estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated
and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More
specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and
allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted. |
|
Mineral Resource |
A concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest
in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A
mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining
dimensions, location or continuity, that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in whole or
in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled. |
|
MoEP |
Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection. |
|
N |
The element nitrogen, one of three main plant nutrients.
|
|
P |
The element phosphorus, one of three main plant nutrients,
that is also used as a raw material in industry. |
|
PK |
Complex fertilizer comprised primarily of two primary nutrients
(P.K). |
|
NPK |
Complex fertilizer comprised primarily of three primary nutrients
(N.P.K). |
|
NYSE |
The New York Stock Exchange. |
|
Phosphate |
Phosphate rock that contains the element phosphorus. Its
concentration is measured in units of P2O5.
|
|
Polyhalite |
A mineral marketed by ICL under the brand name Polysulphate™,
composed of potash, sulphur, calcium, and magnesium. Used in its natural form as a fully soluble and natural fertilizer, which is also
used for organic agriculture and as a raw material for production of fertilizers. |
|
Probable Mineral Reserve |
The economically mineable part of an Indicated and, in some
cases, a Measured Mineral Resource. Quantity, grade and/or quality of Probable Mineral Reserves are computed from information similar
to that used for Proven Mineral Reserves, but the sites for survey, sampling and measurement are further apart or are otherwise less efficiently
spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.
|
|
Proven Mineral Reserve |
The economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource.
Proven Mineral Reserve quantities are computed from information received from explorations, channels, wells, and drilling; grade and/or
quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling. The sites for inspection, sampling and measurement for proven reserves are
spaced so closely to each other so that the geologic character is well defined so the size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves
can be reliably determined. |
|
Chlorine |
A chemical, raw material in various productions process.
A byproduct of Dead Sea Magnesium production. |
|
Sylvinite |
A byproduct from the production of Magnesium from the raw
material – Carnallite. Transferred to DSW as an additional source for potash production. |
|
Polymer |
A chemical compound containing a long chain of repeating
units linked by a chemical bond and created by polymerization. |
|
Potash |
Potassium chloride (KCl), used as a plant’s main source
of potassium. |
|
P2O5
|
Phosphorus pentoxide. |
|
TCFD |
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures.
|
|
REACH |
Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of
Chemicals, a framework within the EU. |
|
Reserves |
The part of a mineral deposit that could be economically
and legally extracted or produced at the time of the Mineral Reserve determination. Reserves are divided between “proven reserves”
and “probable reserves”. |
|
Salt |
Unless otherwise specified, sodium chloride (NaCl).
|
|
S |
Sulphur – a chemical used for the production of sulfuric
acid for sulfate and phosphate fertilizers, and other chemical processes. |
|
Soluble NPK |
Soluble fertilizer containing the three basic elements for
plant development (nitrogen, phosphorus and potash). |
|
Standard |
Fertilizer has small particles. |
|
Tami |
Tami (IMI) Research and Development Institute Ltd.,
the central research institute of ICL. |
|
TASE |
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, Ltd. |
|
USDA |
United States Department of Agriculture. |
|
WPA |
White Phosphoric Acid, purified from MGA. |
|
UK |
The United Kingdom. |
|
Urea |
A white granular or pill solid fertilizer containing 46%
nitrogen. |
|
YTH/YPC |
The Chinese partner in the Company’s joint venture
YPH in China. |
|
4D |
Clean green phosphoric acid, used as a raw material for purification
processes. |
|
PM |
Particular matter. |
| A. |
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA |
| B. |
CAPITALIZATION
AND INDEBTEDNESS |
| C. |
REASONS
FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
| • |
Our mineral extraction operations are dependent on concessions,
licenses and permits granted to us by the respective governments in the countries in which we operate. |
| • |
Our ability to operate and/or expand our production and operating
facilities worldwide is dependent on our receipt of, and compliance
with, permits issued by governmental authorities. A decision by a government authority to deny any of our permit applications may impair
the Company’s business and its operations. |
| • |
Our operations and sales are exposed to high volatility in supply
and demand, pricing fluctuations in commodity markets, expansion of production capacity and competition from some of the world’s
largest chemical and mining companies, as well as mergers of key producer/customer/supplier. |
| • |
Compliance with and changes in environmental laws and regulations
could require us to make substantial capital expenditures and incur costs and liabilities and adversely affect our performance.
|
| • |
We are exposed to risks related to climate change and natural
disasters, impacts of climate-related transition risks, including current and future laws and regulations, as well as other factors resulting
from climate change, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. |
| • |
Our operations could be adversely affected by price increases
or shortages with respect to water, energy and our principal raw materials. |
| • |
The accumulation of salt at the bottom of Pond 5, the central
evaporation pond in our solar evaporation ponds system used to extract minerals from the Dead Sea in Israel, requires regular harvesting
of salt to maintain a fixed brine volume and thereby sustain the production capacity of extracted minerals and prevent potential damage
to the foundations and structures of hotels and other buildings situated close to the edge of the pond. |
| • |
We are exposed to risks associated with our international activities,
which could adversely affect our sales to customers as well as our operations and assets in various countries. Some of these factors may
also make it less attractive to distribute cash generated by our operations outside Israel to our shareholders, use cash generated by
our operations in one country to fund our operations or repayments of our indebtedness in another country and support other corporate
purposes or the distribution of dividends. |
| • |
Changes in valuations and estimates, which serve as a basis for
analyzing our contingent liabilities and for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities, including provisions for waste
removal and the reclamation of mines, may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
| • |
Due to the nature of our operations, we may be exposed to the
risk of adverse ecological events, which may result in impacts that exceed the boundaries of our facilities, cause environmental damage
or damage to human health/life and lead to the shutdown of our sites or administrative, civil and/or criminal proceedings. |
| • |
Accidents occurring during our industrial and mining operations,
including failure to ensure the safety of our workers and processes, could adversely affect our business. |
| • |
Geopolitical changes such as war or political sanctions may materially
and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. |
| • |
Geological and mining conditions and/or effects of prior mining
that may not be fully identified/assessed within the available data or that may differ from those based on our experience;
|
| • |
Assumptions concerning future prices of products, operating costs,
updates to the statistical model and geological parameters according to past experience and developing practices in this field, mining
technology improvements, development costs and reclamation costs; and |
| • |
Assumptions concerning future effects of regulation, including
the issuance of required permits and taxes imposed by governmental agencies. |
| • |
Difficulties and costs associated with complying with a wide variety
of complex laws, treaties and regulations, including the US. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), the UK. Bribery Act
of 2010, Section 291A of the Israeli Penal Law and similar laws in the jurisdictions in which we sell or operate; |
| • |
Unexpected changes in regulatory environments and increased government
ownership and regulation in the countries in which we operate; |
| • |
Political and economic instability, including civil unrest, inflation
and adverse economic conditions resulting from governmental attempts to reduce inflation, such as imposition of higher interest rates
and wage and price controls; |
| • |
Public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics; and
|
| • |
The imposition of tariffs, exchange controls, trade barriers or
sanctions, new taxes or tax rates or other restrictions, including the current trade dispute between the US and China. |
| • |
The duration, severity and extent of a war, along with the necessary
measures undertaken by government authorities or other organizations to manage and mitigate its effects. |
| • |
The possibility of temporary closures of our facilities or the
facilities of our suppliers, customers, their contract manufacturers, and the possibility of certain industries shutting down. |
| • |
The ability to purchase raw materials in times of shortages resulting
from supply chain disruptions and production shutdowns. |
| • |
The ability of our suppliers, contractors and third-party providers
to meet their obligations to us at previously anticipated costs and timelines without significant disruption. |
| • |
Our ability to continue to meet the manufacturing and supply arrangements
with our customers at previously anticipated costs and timelines without significant disruption. |
| • |
The duration and severity of the sustained global or local recession,
and the uncertainty as to when economy will fully recover. |
| • |
Significant disruption of global financial markets and credit
markets, which may reduce our ability to access capital or our customers’ ability to pay us for past or future purchases, which
could negatively affect our liquidity. |
| • |
Some government incentive programs may be discontinued, expire
cancelled or changed. |
| • |
Governments may initiate new legislation or amend existing legislation
in order to impose additional and/or increased fiscal liabilities on our business, such as additional royalties, natural resource taxes
or required investments, as has occurred in Israel, for example, with respect to the Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources.
|
| • |
The applicable tax rates may increase. |
| • |
We may no longer be able to meet the requirements for continuing
to qualify for some incentive programs. |
| • |
Changes in trade agreements between countries, such as in the
trade agreements between the United States and China. |
| • |
Changes in international taxation laws, as may be adopted by several
countries we operate in, or sell to, may result in additional taxes or high tax rates being imposed on our operations. |
| • |
The composition of our Board of Directors (other than external
directors, as described under “Item 6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees— C. Board Practices”. |
| • |
Mergers, acquisitions, divestitures or other business combinations.
|
| • |
Future issuances of ordinary shares or other securities.
|
| • |
Amendments to our Articles of Association, excluding provisions
of the Articles of Association that were determined by virtue of the Special State Share. |
| • |
Dividend distribution policy. |
| • |
Expiration or termination of licenses and/or concessions.
|
| • |
General stock market conditions. |
| • |
Decisions by governmental entities that affect us. |
| • |
Variations in our and our competitors’ results of operations.
|
| • |
Changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities
analysts. |
| • |
General market conditions and other factors, including factors
unrelated to our operating performance. |
| • |
In July 2024, the Company completed the acquisition of Custom
Ag Formulators (CAF), a North American provider of customized agriculture formulations and products for growers, for a consideration of
approximately $60 million. |
| • |
In February 2024, the Company completed the acquisition of Nitro
1000, a manufacturer, developer and provider of biological crop inputs in Brazil, for a consideration of $30 million. |
| • |
In January 2022, the Company completed the sale of its 50% share
in its joint venture, Novetide Ltd. |
| • |
In January 2021 and in July 2021, the Company completed the acquisitions
of Agro Fertiláqua Participações S.A., one of Brazil's leading specialty plant nutrition companies, and the South American
Plant Nutrition business of Compass Minerals América do Sul S.A. (hereinafter - ADS), respectively. |
| • |
Access to one of the world’s richest, longest‑life
and lowest‑cost sources of potash and bromine (the Dead Sea). |
| • |
A potash mine and processing facilities in Spain. |
| • |
Bromine compounds processing facilities in Israel, the Netherlands
and China. |
| • |
A unique integrated phosphate value chain that extends from phosphate
rock mines in Israel and in China to value‑added downstream products produced in facilities located in Israel, Europe, the US, Brazil,
Australia and China. Our specialty phosphates serve the food industry by providing texture and stability solutions to the meat, meat alternatives,
poultry, sea food, dairy and bakery markets, as well as numerous other industrial markets, such as metal treatment, water treatment, oral
care, carbonated drinks, asphalt modification, paints and coatings and more. |
| • |
Polysulphate® resources in the UK. |
| • |
Customized, highly effective specialty fertilizers that provide
improved value to the grower, as well as essential nutrition for plant development, optimization of crop yields and reduced environmental
impact. |
| • |
A focused and highly experienced team of technical experts that
develop production processes, new applications, formulations and products for our agricultural and industrial markets. |
| • |
A strong crop nutrition sales and marketing infrastructure that
optimizes distribution channels of commodity, specialty and semi-specialty fertilizers by leveraging its commercial excellence, global
operational efficiency, region-specific knowledge, agronomic and R&D capabilities, logistical assets and customer relationships.
|
| • |
Research & Development and Innovation: We benefit from
our proximity to Israel’s global-leading high-tech and agri-tech eco-system, as well as our vast agronomy and chemistry knowledge
that we have accumulated over decades. Our extensive global R&D infrastructure includes 24 R&D and Innovation centers around the
world that employ 300 highly experienced personnel who have obtained our 707 active patents in 218 patent families. ICL's R&D unit
supports the development of new, innovative products, applications and formulations for each of our operating segments through internal
research, employee ideation and collaborative research with third parties. |
| • |
An extensive global logistics and distribution network with operations
in over 30 countries. |



| • |
Unique portfolio of mineral assets.
Access to these assets provides us with a consistent, reliable supply of raw materials, allows for large scale production, and
supports our integrated value chain of specialty products. |
| • |
Diversification into higher value‑added
specialty products leverages our integrated business model. Our company’s integrated production processes are based on a
synergistic value chain that allows us to both efficiently convert raw materials into value added downstream products and to use the by
products. For example, in phosphates, we use backward integration to produce specialty phosphates for the food industry and for industrial
applications. These businesses benefit from higher growth rates, higher margins and lower volatility compared to commodity phosphates.
In addition, as a by product of the potash production at the Dead Sea, we generate brines with the highest bromine concentration globally.
Our bromine-based products serve various industries such as the electronics, construction, oil and gas, and automotive industries.
|
| • |
Leading positions in markets with
high barriers to entry. We enjoy leadership positions in many of the key markets in which we operate. We are the clear leader in
the bromine market, with approximately one third of global production, as well as most of the excess capacity in the market. In the potash
market, our Dead Sea operations have a leading competitive cost position. According to CRU, the Dead Sea is among the most competitive
potash sources to China, India and Brazil. ICL also has the largest market share in specialty phosphates, in the combined markets of North
America, Europe and Latin America, and we are the sole producer of polyhalite. In addition, we have leadership positions in additional
product lines, such as phosphorous-based flame retardants, PK fertilizers in Europe, and soluble phosphate-based fertilizers.
|
| • |
Strategically located production
and logistics assets. We benefit from the proximity of our facilities, both in Israel and Europe, to developed economies (Western
Europe) and emerging markets (such as China, India and Brazil). In Israel, we ship from two seaports: The Port of Ashdod (with access
to Europe and South America) and the Port of Eilat (with access to Asia, Africa and Oceania). Access to these two ports provides us with
two distinct advantages versus our competitors: (1) lower plant to port, ocean freight, and transportation costs from our ports to our
target markets, which lowers our overall cost structure; and (2) faster time to market, due to our proximity to end markets, which allows
us to opportunistically fill short lead time orders and strengthen our position with our customers. We also operate manufacturing facilities
in each of the markets we serve – Europe, North and South America, and Asia Pacific, in order to serve our global customers on a
regional basis. |
| • |
Strong cash generation and closely
monitored capital allocation approach. A continuous focus on cash generation and the optimization of capital expenditures (CAPEX)
and working capital – as well as the implementation of efficiency measures – enabled us to generate strong operating cash
flow of $1,468 million in 2024. ICL's capital allocation approach balances long term value creation, through investments in its growth,
with its commitment to providing a solid dividend yield, while aiming to maintain an investment grade rating of at least BBB- from S&P
and Fitch. In 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors resolved to extend our dividend policy of a payout ratio of up to 50% of annual
adjusted net income, until further notice. In respect to 2024 adjusted net income, the Company declared total dividends in the amount
of $242 million, reflecting a dividend yield rate of approximately 4.19% (based on the average share price for the year). See “Item
8 - Financial Information— A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.
|
| • |
Professional expertise and culture
of collaboration and determination. Our operations are managed by an international management team with extensive industry experience.
We develop leaders with strong experience in their fields and focus on nurturing and empowering talent through a global platform of qualification,
collaboration and communication, intended to drive change and innovation within the Company.
|

|
Sub-business line |
Product |
Primary Applications |
Primary End‑Markets
|
|
Flame retardants |
Bromine, phosphorus and magnesium-Based Flame Retardants
|
Plastic, building materials and textile production
|
Electronics, automotive, building, construction and textiles
|
|
Industrial solutions |
Elemental Bromine |
Chemical reagent |
Tire manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and agro, PTA and flame
retardants |
|
Brominated and Phosphorus compounds |
Raw materials for pharmaceuticals and agro |
Pharmaceuticals and agro | |
|
Industrial services |
Functional fluids, Biocides (Water treatment and disinfection),
Merquel and MBr |
Power plants and other industrial facilities |
|
|
Clear Brines |
Oil and gas drillings |
Oil and gas | |
|
Energy storage |
Brominated electrolytes, Phosphorus based active salt for
electrolytes |
Battery producers | |
|
Specialty minerals |
Magnesia Products |
Pharma and Supplementals, health care, transformer steel, catalysts,
fuel and oil additives. |
Supplementals, multivitamins, transformer steel and health
care |
|
Calcium Carbonate |
Supplementals and pharma |
Supplementals and pharma | |
|
Solid MgCl2, KCl |
Deicing, food, oil drilling, pharma |
De-icing, sodium replacement, KCl for drugs. Multi-vitamins,
oil drilling companies, small industrial niche markets |






| • |
A relatively low average cost of potash production at the Dead
Sea, using the sun as a solar energy source in the evaporation process. |
| • |
Logistical advantages due to our strategic geographical location
and access to nearby ports in Israel and Europe, along with our relative proximity to customers, result in highly competitive marine and
overland shipping costs as well as expedited delivery times. |
| • |
Climate advantages, stemming from hot and dry conditions at the
Dead Sea, enable us to store substantial quantities of potash in an open area at minimal cost. This capability allows us to sustain continuous
production in Sodom at full capacity, regardless of fluctuations in global potash demand. |
| • |
Our mine in Spain is one of the few in western Europe, creating
logistics advantages in supplying European customers. |

| • |
An integrated value chain that uses phosphate rock mined in Israel
(at ICL Rotem), as well as in China (YPH), to produce green phosphoric acid which serves mainly as a raw material to produce the segment's
products and products in our Growing Solutions segment. |
| • |
Logistical advantages due to the segment's geographical location
and diversification, proximity to ports in Israel and Europe and relative proximity to our customers. |
| • |
Our ability as a global fertilizer producer to combine potash
and phosphate fertilizers in the same shipment, which enables us to service smaller customers, particularly in Brazil and the US.
|
| • |
The segment enjoys a competitive advantage in specialty phosphates
deriving from product features, quality, service, technical application support, a global manufacturing footprint and a very broad product
line. |
| • |
YPH provides an integrative phosphate platform in China with beneficial
access to the Chinese market. In addition, the segment enjoys a competitive cost advantage in its phosphate activities, due to access
to low‑cost phosphate rock with long‑term reserves. |
| • |
The segment has a diversity of integrated solutions that have
been designed specifically to match a customer’s unique needs. |
| • |
Highly qualified R&D capabilities and existing know-how that
facilitate delivering products in areas of global megatrends (e.g. in the Battery Materials market). |

| • |
Controlled‑release fertilizers (CRF) allow accurate release
of nutrients over time. CRFs have a special coating that allows prolonged release of nutrients from over several weeks to 18 months compared
to regular fertilizers that dissolve in the soil and are immediately available but therefore leach partially into the soil. ICL Growing
Solutions offers leading global and regional brand-name products including Osmocote, Agroblen, Agrocote, Agromaster, Polyblen and Producote.
|
| • |
Osmocote is the most widely known and used controlled‑release
fertilizer by ornamental growers worldwide. The brand is known to deliver high quality ornamental plants due to its consistent release
of nutrients and unique patterned and programmed release technologies. We continue to invest in new technologies as well as in field trials
to test and demonstrate the high reliability and performance of our products. In 2022, ICL presented a faster biodegradable coated fertilizer
technology - eqo.x for Ag, featuring controlled-release urea tailored for open field agriculture. This innovation aims to empower farmers
to optimize crop performance, while minimizing environmental impact through reduced nutrient loss and enhanced nutrient use efficiency
(NUE). In 2023, the segment introduced eqo.s release technology in the professional turf market for turf brands, such as, Sierrablen and
ProTurf. These pioneering release technologies represent the first offering in the market to feature a CRF coating for urea that biodegrades
more rapidly, and they are specifically designed to meet new EU fertilizer standards scheduled to take effect in 2028. |
| • |
Soluble fertilizers, which are fully water‑soluble, are
commonly used for fertilization through drip irrigation systems to optimize fertilizer efficiency in the root zone to maximize yields
and some of them can also be used for foliar applications. Our well-known brands for fertigation include Peters, Universol, Solinure,
Agrolution, Nova, Fertiflow and others. Our leading brands for foliar application are Agroleaf Liquid, Agroleaf Power and Nutrivant. ICL
develops specific formulations for different applications and crops. In South America, products such as Profol, Kellus, Tonus, Translok,
Forcy, Nutritio, Vegetação and Dimi Tônico are used as high technology products for farmers to improve plant nutrition
and physiology through foliar fertilization. There are specific formulations for specific crops, greenhouses and/or open fields, as well
as for different water types. In 2024 we launched a water-soluble fertilizer with humic acid which is expected to improve the absorption
of feed elements at the root. |
| • |
‘Straight fertilizers’ are crystalline, free‑flowing
and high purity phosphorus and potassium soluble fertilizers such as MKP, MAP and PeKacid. Our key brands include NovaPeak, Nova PeKacid
& NovaMAP. PeKacid is a patented product of ICL. It is the only solid, highly acidifying, water-soluble fertigation product that contains
both phosphorus and potassium. The product is ideal for hard water conditions where an acidifying effect is required, as well as for keeping
dripping lines clean. |
| • |
Liquid fertilizers are used for intensive agriculture and are
integrated into irrigation systems (mainly drip systems). Our product line includes mostly tailor‑made formulations designed for
specific soil and water/climate conditions and crop needs. |
| • |
Peat is a growing medium for various crops in which generally
controlled‑release fertilizers and plant‑protection products are mixed in. Specific formulations of growing media are tailored
to meet the requirements of specific plants, including those cultivated in greenhouse bedding plants and outdoor nurseries. One of our
peats is the "Levington” brand, a well-known ICL brand. The integration of growing media products into our UK portfolio enhances
ICL’s ability to offer a holistic and efficient solution to our customers. We are dedicated to adopting more circular products and
expanding our selection of growing media offerings with Fibagro Advance, an outstanding peat alternative manufactured in the UK. This
innovative and advanced woodfibre product is being used as a key component in professional growing media mixes and provides professional
growers with sustainable growing solutions. |
| • |
Water conservation and soil conditioning products are new product
lines developed by the segment. Water conservation products are used in professional turf to keep water in the root-zone. Our key brands
are H2Flo and H2Pro. These products improve water use efficiency. This new technology is also used in agriculture to allow better water
availability around the root-zone of crops. |
| • |
Bio-stimulants technologies, such as Triplus, Improver, Concorde,
Vegetação and Dimi Tônicoare, are being successfully used by farmers to increase their productivity and alleviate abiotic
stress, such as drought, salinity, and others. |
| • |
Adjuvants are essential to enhance foliar nutrition, herbicides
and crop protection spray. We offer the South American market adjuvant technologies, including Helper, Tensor Max and AD+ as well as various
formulations that address the primary challenges facing farmers, such as drift and run off. |
| • |
Our Polysulphate® and Polysulphate®-based fertilizers,
customized to meet the needs of different crops and soil types, maximize yields and allow more precise and efficient applications.
|
| • |
Polysulphate® contributes to and follows the main market
trends in the field of increased nutrient-use efficiency, low carbon footprint and organic fertilizers.
|
| • |
PotashpluS – a compressed mixture of Polysulphate®
and potash. The product includes potassium, sulphur, calcium and magnesium. |
| • |
PKpluS – a unique combination of phosphate, potash and Polysulphate®.
|
| • |
NPKpluS – a unique combination of Nitrogen, phosphate, potash
and Polysulphate®. This product includes all 6 macro nutrients in one granule. |

| • |
A strong, efficient and integrated supply chain with in-house
access to high quality raw materials, mostly phosphate and potash, which is based on an extensive product portfolio and multi-location
production. |
| • |
Unique R&D and product development capabilities, creating
a strong platform for future growth in controlled-release fertilizers, fertigation, foliar soluble fertilizers, bio-stimulants, water
efficiency and innovative, next generation products. |
| • |
Added value production process technology – custom-made
formulations that meet our customers’ unique needs. |
| • |
A highly skilled global agronomic sales team that provides professional
advice and consultation which fosters distributors' loyalty. |
| • |
Full product portfolio (one-stop shop). |
| • |
ICL’s well-known and leading brands. |
| • |
Direct working relationships with farmers (B2C) especially in
Brazil, Israel and India, providing service at the field level and acceleration of the innovation cycle. |
| • |
In 2024, we launched Recytex, an innovative startup that has developed
a patented, eco-efficient recycling solution to break down blended textile waste, such as polycotton, at scale. Using a mineral-water-based
process, we transform mixed scraps, post-consumer clothing and industrial fabrics into high-purity, reusable fiber components which can
be seamlessly integrated into manufacturing lines to create sustainable yarns and fabrics. By revitalizing textile waste and providing
premium, spin-ready components, Recytex will enable brands to meet sustainability goals and comply with the latest industry regulations,
supporting the transition to a Circular Economy for textiles. |
| • |
We continuously explore new technologies to use secondary source
phosphate as an alternative to virgin raw materials. We are developing future resources for our fertilizer products, including a technology
roadmap for recycling and recovery of phosphorus and nitrogen from secondary sources. |
| • |
PuraLoop® is an innovative phosphorus fertilizer produced
by us through the reaction of 100% SSA (sewage sludge ash). This pioneering fertilizer addresses the critical issue of resource conservation
in agriculture and promotes sustainable farming. It has been recognized by Cefic (European Chemical Industry Council) - Responsible Care
Award 2024 for its exceptional contribution to advancing the Antwerp Declaration. It was also declared a winner in the Time for Change
- Circularity and Climate Neutrality category. |
| • |
Pearl® is a sustainably recycled phosphorus that we produce
that helps to close the phosphorus cycle. It is recovered from high concentrations of phosphorus in diverse water streams, preventing
losses into aquatic environments while preserving finite rock phosphate resources. It is integrated into our premium controlled-release
fertilizer, Sierrablen Plus®. |
| • |
MagiK® is a powerful organic multi-nutrient for crops, used
as an additive in fertilization products. It was developed from a by-product stream of our magnesium production process. |
| • |
Fibagro Advance is a peat-alternative growing media that uses
waste from the timber industry and a thermo-mechanical process to create a unique matrix that improves moisture and nutrient retention.
The product has a lower carbon footprint compared to peat and other peat alternatives. |
| • |
Our Ambition Creates Excellence (ACE) program includes the development
of a standardized approach for Circular Economy that is designed to systematically review ICL’s waste streams, by-products and other
outputs from our operations and identify opportunities to develop new and useful products, as well as to optimize our operations.
|
| • |
As part of our Circular Economy efforts in China, we are developing
various uses for Phosphogypsum, the only by-product from our Chinese site that has not yet been fully utilized. In addition to existing
solutions, the Company, in collaboration with local authorities, has developed a solution to rehabilitate an old mine. In 2024, we succeeded
to utilize 7.8 million cubic meters of phosphogypsum. |
| • |
At ICL Dead Sea, salt is used as internal infrastructure in the
rehabilitation of operational roads, construction of wall barriers, as well as in other infrastructure projects. |

| • |
Climate risk management is an integral part of our overall approach
to ‘Doing the Right Thing, in the Right Way, Every Day’. ICL’s Board is responsible for setting ICL’s overall
strategic direction, including sustainability, climate and ESG related matters. The Board views climate change as a material component
of the Company's strategy. |
| • |
The Board has appointed a Climate, Sustainability and Community
Relations Committee (“CSC Committee”) to oversee climate-related issues, including but not limited to, climate-change risk
assessment and mitigation plans, installation of renewable energy facilities, site decarbonization plans, implementation of Circular Economy
activities, achievement of energy and water savings targets and implementation of various policies related to environmental impact. The
CSC Committee is chaired by Dr. Miriam Haran, a leading environmental expert with substantial experience in environmental and climate-related
matters. The CSC Committee comprises three additional directors on the Board who possess significant industrial and risk management experience,
including experience regarding environmental matters. |
| • |
The CSC Committee convenes quarterly, as scheduled, unless additional
meetings are necessitated for ad hoc purposes. The meetings include review of updates regarding the Company’s latest ESG related
events, as well as changes in underlying regulations, ESG risk assessments and ESG management systems, in addition to review and approval
of policies and procedures when relevant. The CSC Committee also holds annual discussions regarding, among other things, risk mitigation
measures, climate-related risk and opportunity disclosures, the Company’s ESG reporting, and ICL’s sustainability KPI targets.
Progress made on climate-related targets, and adherence to the Company’s GHG decarbonization targets, are also monitored in these
meetings (for more information, refer to the ‘Metrics and Targets’ section below). |
| • |
In February 2023, the Board approved the submission of a declaration
to the SBTi organization, wherein the Company will commit to set a near-term, science-based target in accordance with the framework developed
by the SBTi. The Board’s approval followed discussion and approval by ICL’s Global Executive Committee (GEC) in January 2023,
and the CSC Committee in February 2023. Following CSC Committee and Board approval, in March 2023, SBTi officially confirmed ICL’s
commitment to develop near-term targets in accordance with the criteria and processes of the SBTi. We expect to submit our targets for
validation to SBTi in March 2025, in line with the timeline criteria set-out by SBTi. |
| • |
The Board’s Audit & Accounting Committee, as determined
in ICL’s Board Manual, is responsible for, among other responsibilities, overseeing ICL’s risk management, including monitoring
our activities to manage and mitigate identified risks, as well as to ensure our compliance with relevant regulations. Accordingly, ICL’s
Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”), which includes climate related risks, is discussed at least on a bi -annual basis, and
any material changes are updated on a regular basis. |
| • |
ICL’s ERM approach and constituting documents, including
its ERM policy and procedures, follow the risk management methodology of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Committee
(COSO). The methodology is defined as “the culture, capabilities, and practices, integrated with strategy setting and its performance,
that organizations rely on to manage risk in creating, preserving, and realizing value”. |
| • |
ICL’s Global Executive Committee (“GEC”), comprised
of its senior executive management members, meets on a weekly basis and is responsible for overseeing the Company’s actions, policies
and initiatives designed to ensure that ICL’s material ESG and climate -related risks are being appropriately addressed and managed.
It also renders decisions on various issues including sustainability, climate and ESG matters. This includes the formation of annual budgets,
deliberations regarding major capital and operational expenditures for climate mitigation activities related to low carbon production
products and services, climate -related transactions (including acquisitions, mergers and divestitures) and the implementation of the
climate transition plan. |
| • |
To assist the GEC in better monitoring and overseeing ICL’s
sustainability, climate and ESG related matters, the GEC appointed a GEC Sustainability Committee, an advisory committee which convenes
on a quarterly basis. The GEC Sustainability Committee is chaired by ICL’s EVP, Chief Legal and Sustainability Officer, and is comprised
of the CFO, the EVP, Chief Risk Officer, ICL's Potash Division President, who is also in charge of ICL’s global EHS, the Chief Procurement
& CAPEX Officer, the Chief Innovation and Technology Officer and the ICL's Phosphate Specialty Solutions Division President. Three
separate management-level committees report to the GEC Sustainability Committee on climate related risks. These include: (i) a Physical
Risk Committee and (ii) a Transition Risk Committee. A third committee, an Operational Executive Committee (OEC), is responsible for management,
including measurement, of certain operational matters, including: waste, water management, air quality and pollution, biodiversity and
EHS. All three committees are supported by ICL’s global sustainability and risk management teams, which manage both physical and
transitional climate-related matters. The purpose of these committees is to identify potential climate related risks and opportunities,
assess their impact on ICL’s operational and logistic sites, manage their financial transition, and determine mitigation actions
to minimize ICL’s exposure to risk according to the respective ICL risk appetite. The chairs of the committees meet on a periodical
basis to synchronize their activities. |

| • |
Scenario SSP1-2.6 reflects
a future where physical risks, such as extreme weather events and long-term temperature increases, are minimized compared to other higher
emissions scenarios. |
| • |
Scenario SSP2-4.5 addresses
moderate physical risks, such as the increased frequency and severity of heatwaves, storms, and droughts in the long run. |
| • |
Scenario SSP5-8.5 assumes
a business-as-usual trajectory with limited global mitigation efforts. It reflects severe physical risks in the long term, including frequent
extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and significant ecosystem disruptions. This scenario highlights the need for robust resilience
planning to mitigate catastrophic impacts on operations, infrastructure, and supply chains. |


|
Transition risks |
Horizon and potential impact
|
Description
|
ICL’s response |
|
Policy &
legal
Carbon pricing mechanisms |
Time horizons: Short,
Medium and Long
Potential impact:
Medium to high, particularly within 2050-time horizon and
ambitious transition scenarios |
Stricter environmental regulations may impose additional
compliance costs and operational constraints:
Regulatory developments in countries or jurisdictions where
we operate, exposure to carbon trading schemes, cross-border tax and adjustment mechanisms, increases in existing carbon pricing, and
carbon taxes on energy and other supplies are expected to lead to increased costs for ICL. Since carbon pricing mechanisms are still in
development in most areas globally, it is expected that the risk exposure will increase over time.
|
In recent years, we have undertaken
proactive measures to reduce our carbon footprint as part of our decarbonization roadmap that includes increasing energy efficiency and
transitioning to lower carbon energy sources. We have already achieved a 25.3% (vs 2018 base year) reduction in Scope 1-2.
Consequently, we are actively improving our understanding
of our GHG emissions' impacts and are actively striving to reduce GHG emissions throughout our value chain enabling us to reduce our exposure
to carbon pricing risks.
This year we further updated our climate
risk assessment, using the latest releases for carbon price projections, on both our direct (Scope 1 & 2) and indirect (Scope 3) emissions,
covering potential impacts from 2025 to 2050. The new Israeli carbon tax was also incorporated into the models, with adjustments made
to reflect the updated Israeli carbon prices.
The analysis outputs will improve
our financial preparedness and planning and foster strategic decision-making to mitigate risks linked with carbon pricing transitions.
|
|
Reputation
Increased stakeholders concern regarding environmental
performance
|
Time horizons: Medium
Potential impact:
Medium to high, in all scenarios |
There has been an increased focus, including from investors,
the public, and governmental and non-governmental authorities, regarding environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, including
with respect to climate change and GHG emissions. As ICL operates in a carbon intensive sector, increased stakeholder concerns and expectations
regarding operational and product -related environmental performance could have an impact on our reputation (preference for our products
or investor confidence). |
ICL’s commitment to ambitious climate targets is
aligned with the Paris Agreement. Therefore, in recent years we have undertaken proactive measures to reduce our carbon footprint and
actively improved our understanding of our GHG emissions (Scope 1-2-3), coupled with developing low-carbon products and services, raising
awareness and creating the proper governance structure to support climate related risks and opportunities, as well as increasing transparency
throughout our public disclosure and reports. |
|
Transition risks |
Horizon and potential impact
|
Description
|
ICL’s response |
|
Financial
Financial Climate Alignment |
Time horizons: Medium
Potential impact:
Medium |
Investors are increasingly prioritizing climate-related
risks in their portfolios. Companies that fail to align with low-carbon objectives face reduced access to capital or higher financing
costs. This pressure is driven by external trends in sustainable investing and internal shifts in financial institutions’ policies,
which require greater transparency and climate alignment. |
Sustainable finance plays an important role in enabling
ICL’s transition to a low-carbon and environmentally sustainable economy. Our global finance teams are integrating ESG KPIs and
GHG reduction targets into financial reporting and planning, building the data infrastructure to support decision-making and enhancing
ESG performance transparency with robust financial metrics, creating resilience for short, medium, and long-term horizons. With this infrastructure
in place, ICL is well-positioned to leverage financial opportunities to advance its sustainability agenda, as demonstrated over the past
several years. ICL has integrated sustainability targets into its financial operations, securing a €250 million sustainability-linked
loan and a $1.55 billion sustainability-linked revolving credit facility, which included targets for a reduction in absolute Scope 1 &
2 GHG emissions and additional sustainability related KPIs. For more information see Strategy – Financial Planning. |
|
Technology
Requirements for clean energy |
Time horizons: Short
to Medium
Potential impact:
Low in all scenarios |
We acknowledge that our sector relies heavily on energy,
and as global demand shifts towards greener sources of energy, there is a heightened need to invest in renewable energy procurement. Both
external policies and internal targets drive this imperative. However, transitioning to alternative energy sources may result in increased
operational costs. |
ICL recognizes the necessity of sustainable energy practices.
By entering long term renewable Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and utilizing energy attributes certificates (EACs), we will reduce our
Scope 2 emissions, mitigating energy transition risks and strengthening our portfolio to increase operational resilience. |
|
Technology
The ability to Implement direct operational reduction measures
|
Time horizons:
Medium to Long
Potential impact: High
in all scenarios |
Increasing global pressures to reduce GHG emissions highlights
the necessity for companies to upgrade their infrastructure, ensuring adherence to environmental standards and energy efficiency goals.
This could result in increased costs to upgrade and improve our infrastructure, including due to energy efficiencies and optimization
of production processes, to reduce our direct Scope 1 emissions. |
ICL has already initiated a process of addressing this
risk by deploying a team of experts internally (our ACE program) which focuses on identifying initiatives to reduce Scope 1 emissions
through, among others, energy efficiency measures at various ICL sites. In addition, following our commitment to establish science -based
emission reduction targets, we are exploring the possibility of green electricity production and storage at our primary locations, aligning
with our long-term sustainability goals. For further information, please see "Energy" below. |
|
Markets
Reduced demand due to chronic changes in weather patterns
|
Time
horizons: Medium to Long
Potential
impact: Medium |
An increase in the temperature and volatile precipitation,
chronic changes in regional climates which can result in shifts in the average growing season, growing conditions and crop mix, may result
in reduced demand for commodity fertilizers. |
ICL is actively monitoring market trends and weather-related
agricultural growing conditions in response to climate change, while also employing scenario-based models to assess longer terms potential
impacts. We believe our diverse products and services portfolio, which supports precision agriculture and other products that contribute
to plant resilience, will better support farmers in a changing environment. |
|
Transition opportunities |
Horizon and potential impact
|
Description
|
ICL’s response |
|
Markets
Increased market demand for sustainable solutions
|
Time horizon: Medium
to Long
Potential impact:
Medium to High in all scenarios due to changing climate and evolving regulations |
We anticipate several market opportunities arising from
sustainable novel solutions and shifts in the markets driven by climate change which could lead to increased revenue. These new solutions
will also broaden ICL's outlook on new low carbon markets, enhancing our potential for growth and market penetration. |
As a global specialty minerals company, we are actively
exploring new market opportunities for sustainable solutions. Our downstream scenario analysis identified significant potential in several
major global markets for specialty and low-carbon fertilizers, driven by the impact of climate change scenarios on agricultural yields.
Projections for 2030 and 2050 indicated increasing demand due to climate change-induced shifts in agricultural needs. This analysis was
enhanced by incorporating the assessment of climate scenarios' impact on the transition from conventional fertilizers to specialty products.
More-over, the rising demand for electricity storage solutions aligns well with our expanding product portfolio. These emerging opportunities
enable us to expand our market presence and support revenue growth. |
|
Products
& Services
Improved product offerings |
Time horizon: Medium
Potential impact: High
|
We anticipate an increase in consumer demand for products
and services that support climate-change mitigation and adaptation, including specialty fertilizers and energy storage solutions, which
is expected to propel revenue growth. |
Our products and services cater to the emerging needs of
climate-change mitigation and adaptation. Our product portfolio features among others, highly effective specialty fertilizers that facilitate
optimal nutrient release, enabling growers worldwide to reduce their fertilizer usage while simultaneously achieving higher quality crops
and yields with lower environmental impacts. ICL’s CRFs and bio-stimulants support plant nutrition and minimize N2O emission in
the use phase, reducing GHG emissions and supporting climate change mitigation. ICL's expansion in the AgroTech sector is also expected
to improve farming techniques and increase yields with lower environmental impact. Furthermore, climate-change mitigation requires a transition
to alternative energy sources. These, in turn, require energy storage solutions to become mainstream. Therefore, we anticipate an increase
in demand for Energy Storage Solutions (ESS), a necessary step in the transition to renewable energy. Energy storage is a potentially
significant source of growth for our phosphate -based and bromine-based specialty products. Therefore, our focus is on adding such solutions
to our product portfolio, for example, by utilizing phosphate raw materials to produce Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP). For further information
about our sustainable solutions, see "Strategy – Products and Services" above. |
|
Transition opportunities |
Horizon and potential impact
|
Description
|
ICL’s response |
|
Resource
Efficiency & Energy Sour
Transition to Sustainable Energy Practices |
Time horizon: Medium
to Long
Potential impact: High
|
Maximizing resource efficiency and transitioning to alternative
energy sources present an opportunity for ICL.
|
ICL has dedicated teams and forums that focus on opportunities
in energy efficiency. By prioritizing these initiatives, we anticipate a reduction in operational costs and our environmental footprint
as renewable energy is projected to be more cost -effective (in part due to lower carbon taxes) compared to fossil fuels. Our strategy
involves.
expanding our renewable energy mix and facilitating a shift
towards heightened electrification across our operations. Furthermore, we continue our efforts to digitize and analyze site level Energy
& GHG data which allows us to improve data quality and management. This supports our journey to become more resource efficient and
to reduce our footprint. Looking ahead, we are exploring the possibility of green electricity production and storage at our primary locations,
aligning with our long-term sustainability goals. |
|
Resilience
Future resilience |
Time horizon: Medium
to Long
Potential impact: Medium
|
We believe that the resilience of our Company can be increased
by implementing initiatives aimed at improving our efficiency, designing innovative production processes, developing new products and
engaging in strategic procurement practices. These efforts will ensure that we maintain our competitive advantage and continue our preparations
for a low-carbon future. |
Our strategic approach to advance sustainable practices
significantly contributes to our resilience. Our research, development and innovation efforts focus on solutions that aim to align with
the UN SDGs. For more information about our sustainable solutions, see Strategy – Investment in R&D. This, in turn, provides
us with a long-term vision to pursue major market opportunities, including innovative climate-resilient solutions that enhance business
resilience. For more information about our sustainable solutions, see Strategy – Products and Services.
In addition, continued innovative practices and improvements
in production efficiency increase the resilience of our operations. For more information about our operations, see Strategy – Operations.
Integrated into our strategy is the focus of our value chain, with both supply chain and sustainable procurement being in scope. For more
information about our supply chain and sustainable procurement, see Strategy – Supply Chain and Strategy – Sustainable Procurement.
Additionally, enhanced access to green financing resulting
from a reduced Company-wide carbon footprint and clear sustainability strategy unlocks additional resources that further bolster our resilience.
For more information, see Strategy –Finance Planning. |
|
Year 2024 (2)(3)
|
Year 2023 |
Year 2022 |
Year 2018 (1)
|
2024 VS 2018 | ||
|
Scope 1 |
Tonnes CO2e
(thousands) |
2,131 |
2,102 |
2,126 |
2,220 |
(4.0%) |
|
Scope 2
Market-based |
Tonnes CO2e
(thousands) |
65 |
186 |
281 |
720 |
(90.9%) |
|
Total scope 1+2 GHG emission |
Tonnes CO2e
(thousands) |
2,196 |
2,288 |
2,407 |
2,940 |
(25.3%) |
| (1) |
2018 is the baseline year for ICL’s decarbonization roadmap.
|
| (2) |
On a “same site basis” (excluding facilities acquired
in Brazil during 2021), 2024 Scope 1 and Scope 2 (market-based) emissions were 2,114 and 65 thousand tonnes CO2e,
respectively. |
| (3) |
2024 independent assurance process was performed in accordance
with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements ISAE 3000 (Revised) |

| • |
Development of fertilizers with better nutrient-use efficiency
and reduction of emissions. |
| • |
Development of biological bio-stimulants that stimulate plant
growth and provide resilience to various stress conditions. |
| • |
Development of products that improve water use efficiency.
|
| • |
Investigating opportunities to integrate waste streams into our
production processes, fostering a closed-loop Circular Economy and developing future sources for sustainable fertilizer products.
|
| • |
Including integration of secondary source Phosphate technologies
(Circular Economy) for immediate use in our production facilities in Europe and development of future raw material sources for our fertilizer
products, including a technology road map for recycling and recovery of phosphorous and nitrogen from secondary sources to transform our
products into sustainable fertilizers. |
| • |
Continued diversification and development of a product portfolio
of meat substitutes: ICL and Plantible Foods have partnered to launch ROVITARIS® Binding Solution, a revolutionary clean label binding
solution for plant-based meat and seafood applications that may replace most chemically processed binders. |
| • |
Development of a Battery Materials portfolio that includes Lithium
Iron Phosphate (LFP) cathode active material, brominated electrolytes and Phosphorus-based active salts for electrolytes for current generation
and next-generation lithium-ion batteries (Energy Storage Solutions). |
| • |
Our Business Development unit has scouted more than 700
Food tech start-ups to identify disruptive technologies for ICL Phosphate Specialties. Following investments in Protera SAS and Plantible
Foods Inc., ICL Planet Startup Hub invested in Arkeon GmbH, a start-up that converts CO2 into nutritious amino acids and sustainable protein.
We continue to seek innovation partners who transform sustainable food systems. |
| • |
Our Agmatix is pioneering the future of sustainable agriculture
through advanced data and AI-driven solutions. By transforming agronomic and environmental data into actionable insights, Agmatix enhances
crop yields, promotes sustainability, and strengthens crop resilience. Its innovative technology supports global efforts to combat climate
change, drive responsible land use, and ensure food security. |
| • |
We developed a data-driven impact and evidence assessment tool
for all RD&I projects to maximize ICL’s actions on tackling climate change, advancing food security and other contributions
to human health and wellbeing. This decision-making tool is integrated into the product development process. In 2023, we completed six
case studies and incorporated this tool into our new product development process. |
| • |
Commissioning a high efficiency gas-fired combined heat and power
(CHP) plant at our Sodom facility to supply ICL’s facilities in Israel, replacing older oil-fired power generation systems.
|
| • |
Transitioning to the procurement of renewably generated electricity
across all ICL sites, beginning with the procurement of renewable electricity for ICL sites in Europe and expanding to sites in the US,
Israel, China and Brazil. |
| • |
Decommissioning our oil shale-based power generation at Rotem
(Israel), in favor of a more efficient gas-fired power plant with significantly lower GHG emissions. |
| • |
Recovering heat from various chemical reactions to produce zero
emission power for utilization by ICL sites. |
| • |
Improved measurement of GHG emissions, including the increase
of accessibility to site -level carbon metrics and analytics for our operational managers and management through digital dashboards for
up-to-date reporting of emissions at site and product levels. |
| • |
Eliminating or reducing process GHG emissions through changes
to chemical processes and production lines. |
| • |
Converting our remaining production facilities that utilize high
-emitting fossil fuels to energy generated from natural gas, renewable sources and waste heat. |
| • |
Increasing energy efficiency by phasing out inefficient production
technologies, streamlining our production facilities, increasing the efficiency of our consumption of heat and steam, and recovering heat
where possible. |
| • |
Reducing the use of electricity for lighting and air conditioning
by implementing more efficient technologies. |
| • |
Installing solar photovoltaic (solar PV) electricity generation
systems in all available and appropriate areas within the operational boundaries of our sites. |
| • |
Considering carbon pricing in product development, acquisitions
and capital investment decision-making to raise internal awareness, promote better life cycle operating decisions, and better prepare
our business for future emissions trading schemes. |
| • |
Securing long-term renewable energy power purchase agreements
(PPAs) to expand the share of renewables in ICL’s energy mix globally. |
| • |
Expanding investments in Battery Materials, such as the lithium
iron phosphate (LFP) cathode active material manufacturing plant in the US, supporting the transition to renewable energy. |
| • |
Actively addressing Scope 3 emissions by assessing suppliers,
fostering partnerships for education and emissions reduction, and optimizing logistics operations with alternative fuels, electric vehicles,
and energy-efficient shipping. |
| • |
Strengthening Circular Economy initiatives by maximizing the use
of byproducts and waste heat in production processes to enhance energy efficiency. |
| • |
DSW successfully completed the installation of the third and final
particles reduction unit (WESP). DSM successfully implemented the second major particle emissions reduction unit, and the final third
unit will be implemented and commence operation in 2025. Our other production sites in Israel are also increasing their efforts to reduce
air emissions. |
| • |
In January 2024, a new emission permit was issued to ICL Rotem
under the Israeli Clean Air Act (hereinafter - the Law) valid until January 2031. ICL Rotem is implementing several significant emissions
reduction projects as required in the permit, according to a multi-year plan. The Company is in active discussions with Israel’s
Ministry of Environmental Protection (MoEP) to assure adherence to all stipulations outlined in the permit, including the conditions specified
in an administrative order under Section 45 of the Law, and to achieve satisfactory resolutions to notable timeline execution challenges
for a limited number of projects. |
| • |
ICL Dead Sea (DSW) - Salt by-product is transferred to a reservoir
at DSW’s site. DSW uses salt as infrastructure material in various applications. In addition, DSW is examining alternatives for
salt storage/usage. |
| • |
ICL Rotem – In 2024, the site completed the implementation
of a master plan for wastewater treatment, with the principal goal of reducing effluent quantities. The plan also addressed the treatment
of additional wastewater streams created by air emission purification processes, required by the Israeli Clean Air Law. |
| • |
Neot Hovav - Pursuant to the requirements of the MoEP, the Neot
Hovav site is required to treat remnant hazardous waste in the coming years. This waste is stored in a designated defined area on the
site's premises in coordination with the MoEP. Some of the currently produced waste is also stored in this area. Treatment of the waste
is partially conducted through a combustion facility (Bromine Recovery Unit), which recovers hydro-bromine acid. Additional waste quantities
are sent to external designated treatment facilities. Once the area is cleared, the Company will be required to conduct a soil survey.
For further information, see Note 17 to our Audited Financial Statements. |
| • |
ICL Haifa (F&C) – The phosphoric acid production line
from the 1990’s, which has since been shut down, resulted in a by-product in the form of a phosphogypsum pile, which is currently
stored on site. The Company is taking the necessary actions, in coordination with the MoEP, to comply with regulatory requirements in
a timely manner, including as stipulated in the Toxins Permit issued to the site. |
| • |
ICL Iberia - A multi-year program is underway to restore large
salt piles, with focus on wastewater drainage and sludge treatment. In April 2021, the Company signed an agreement with the Catalan Water
Agency (ACA), for the construction and operation of new collector infrastructure. The new collector is essential to remove brine water,
which will be used for both restoration and production. For further information, see Notes 17 and 18 to our Audited Financial Statements.
|
| • |
ICL Boulby - All wastewater leaving our site in the UK is according
to a permit issued by the UK’s Environment Agency. The site's wastewater consists of extracted sea water, mine brines, gathered
surface rainwater and water treated at the onsite sewage plant. Multiple parameter limits are imposed on the site by the wastewater permit
and wastewater amounts have been reduced considerably since ICL Boulby started to exclusively produce Polysulphate and Polysulphate-based
products. |
| • |
ICL US Gallipolis Ferry - In January 2023, the site entered into
a Consent Order with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (hereinafter - WV DEP) regarding water discharge, allowing
for the development and execution of a plan to meet permit requirements. Followingr timely execution of the proposed plan and milestone
schedule, we found one milestone to be unfeasible for maintaining permit compliance. As a result, we proactively proposed an alternative
plan which the WV DEP accepted, with certain provisions, in 2024. |
| • |
ICL DSW – Due to the negative water balance, the water level in the northern basin of the Dead Sea
is decreasing. The receding water level over the years has required ICL to reposition its pumping station northwards to enable continued
operations in the Dead Sea region. This also enables the existence of tourism infrastructure. The P-9 pumping station and feeder canal,
crossing the Tze’elim stream, were constructed to maintain operational continuity. The Tze’elim stream alluvial fan is one
of the largest and most developed of all the surviving fans in the area, and therefore it is important to preserve it and to protect the
biodiversity existing in this habitat. ICL reached an agreement with environmental authorities and organizations according to which seven
culverts were constructed above the excavated canal to allow flood waters to flow through the original flow channel without damaging the
feeder canal, while maintaining the braided channel fan pattern. The culverts serve as an ecological corridor by providing passageways
for animals. We periodically review field data and make adjustments in accordance with the findings. |
| • |
ICL Iberia - ICL Iberia’s past activities have resulted
in the salinization of some water wells in the Suria and Sallent sites. This resulted in compensation claims from owners of land surrounding
the sites. |
| • |
ICL Rotem – |
| • |
ICL R&D Beer Sheva - A soil survey was conducted, the results
of which point to soil contamination. ICL is acting in accordance with the survey's findings and related MoEP guidelines. A pilot for
the clearing process of the contaminated soil is expected to begin in 2025. |
| • |
lCL Periclase - In 2023, brine, a non-hazardous substance, leaked
from a ruptured pipeline in a nature reserve. No significant damage was recorded. As a result, several hundred meters of pipes were replaced
during 2023 and 2024, including in the Dead Sea Works area. The company is acting in full coordination with the authorities.
|
| • |
Brazil - After conducting soil surveys at our Brazilian sites,
we identified some immaterial historical soil and groundwater contamination. In response, we are actively engaged in remediation efforts,
while maintaining close cooperation with governmental agencies and local regulators. |
| • |
ICL DSW - Sodom Saltmarsh Lake. The Ashalim reservoir, located
south of ICL’s Dead Sea site is a wet habitat, situated within a typical arid habitat. It is abundant with rich biological diversity.
ICL Dead Sea, whose excavations in the region created this wet habitat, takes extra measures to preserve it and invests in making this
unique habitat accessible to the public. In the past, the Sodom salt flats area was a resting stop and habitat for migrating birds. Today,
due to changes in the land’s use for agriculture, residential and industrial purposes, almost no salt flats remain. These flats
have unique characteristics with high salinity in the soil and unique species that have adapted to these extreme conditions. The salt
flats in Israel are a rare habitat and have been shrinking over time. The Sodom Saltmarsh Lake has become a salt flat substitute. In recent
years, the lake has maintained relatively good water quality, and we continue to monitor it closely. Additionally, vegetation has also
been planted in a stable water environment to support the ecosystem. The lake now serves as a resting spot for migrating birds and a nesting
site for a wide range of species. We have also invested in additional infrastructure to provide the public with better and safer access
to the Sodom Saltmarsh Lake. |
| • |
ICL Rotem - Over the last 8 years, ICL Rotem has participated
in academic cooperative research with Ben Gurion University of the Negev, which is examining the ecological and biodiversity effectiveness
of mine reclamation. The parameters being researched include soil chemistry, soil microbiology, vegetation growth potential, abundance,
arthropod animals and remote sensing land analysis. Following the initial research results and as part of the rehabilitation process,
we are creating micro-topography to diversify the landscape. We also created a seed bank from seeds we collected from the field as part
of our contribution to the rehabilitation and recovery of vegetation in reclaimed areas. |
| • |
ICL Boulby - Adjacent to ICL Boulby’s mining facilities,
and within its operational area, are non-developed turfs where important habitats and species flourish. Most notable are the woodlands
at Mines Wood and Ridge Lane Wood, near Dalehouse. These are some of the most wildlife-rich woodlands in the Northeast England/Yorkshire
areas. The woodlands are home to invertebrates, birds and mammals. For over a decade ICL Boulby has worked with the Industry Nature Conservation
Association (INCA) to monitor and manage the wildlife that exists in proximity to the mine. Key to this process is a Site Biodiversity
Action Plan (Site BAP), operated by ICL Boulby within its operational area. The Site BAP is designed to conserve key habitats and species
which live at the site and is assisted by INCA annually. For further information, see “Item 4 – Information on the Company
— D. Property, Plant and Equipment — Mineral Extraction and Mining Operations”. |
| • |
ABISOLOS: Brazilian Association of Plant Nutrition Technology
Industries. The association focuses on defending the interests of foliar and specialty fertilizers industries. It recently expanded its
scope to also operate with adjuvants and biological inputs. |
| • |
ANPII BIO: National association of inoculant producers and importers.
It was created to work with the inoculants industry. It recently expanded its scope to the bioinputs segments, including Biocontrol.
|
| • |
ABIAM: Brazilian Association of Industry and Commerce of Food
Ingredients and Additives. Association focused on defending the interests of the additives industry for use in human food. |
| • |
The European Commission’s Ecodesign E-Display regulation,
which has been in force since March 2021, bans the use of halogenated flame retardants in electronic display enclosures. We are closely
monitoring future developments and proactively engaged in innovative chemical design, informative chemical selection tools and end of
life solutions to respond to these challenges. |
| • |
Borate salts and boric acid – Some of our products changed
their classification (SDS, labeling) due to the reproductive classification of concentration limit. The industry has already expressed
a requirement to re-formulate to exclude these salts and ICL is working on respective solutions and replacements. |
| • |
Ammonium Bromide: |
| - |
The final decision by BPR on the use of biocides using ammonium
bromide as a precursor is unknown at this stage. |
| • |
Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA or TBBA) flame retardant is under
review as part of REACH. The result of the review is that TBBA is classified as a Carcinogen 1B and is, as SVHC, added to the candidate
list for Authorization. The advocacy team is actively working to identify uses that may be exempt from any potential restrictions. Currently,
no uses have been banned, and it appears that the 'reactive' use in PCBs is not within the scope of ECHA. Any proposed restrictions will
take several years to be implemented and enforced. |
| • |
Fyrol PCF (TCPP) – an NTP study concluded that TCPP is a
carcinogen at highly elevated exposures. In response, Europe is moving to classify the chemical as Cat. 1B thus imposing new restrictions
on selected consumer uses. However, in other applications, such as insulation, industry consortiums have calculated large safety margins
for TCPP exposures. Based on its own review, the industry has self-classified TCPP as Cat. 2. Furthermore, discussions concerning the
potential ED (Endocrine disrupter) properties of TCPP are still ongoing, adding another layer of complexity to the regulatory considerations
surrounding this chemical. Denmark has submitted a proposal to ECHA to classify TCPP as Carcinogenic, Reproductive Toxicity and Endocrine
Disrupting Effects (ED). TCPP is expected to be declared as SVHC. |
| • |
Triphenyl Phosphate (TPhP): Triphenyl Phosphate (TPhP) was added
to the SVHC list on 7 November 2024 due to endocrine disrupting properties in the environment. This is expected to be classified according
to the CLP regulations, either authorizing or restricting the substance. Many PFRs and PISs contain TPhP as a by-product formed during
production. While some products with high TPhP levels may face restrictions, we have solutions for certain PFRs and PISs and are actively
working on solutions for others. |
| • |
Decabromodiphenyl Ethane (DBDPE): Sweden has proposed to classify DBDPE as vPvB. If approved,
the next step is adding it to the SVHC list followed by authorization or restriction. In Canada and Australia, DBDPE is also under pressure.
As a result, the future of this substance is very uncertain. |
| • |
Modification of the harmonized classification and labelling
process (legally binding classifications) to prioritize new hazard classes, carry out classifications for groups of substances, increase
the number of dossiers and automatically recognize the classification of substances determined in other regulatory frameworks such as
REACH. |
| • |
CLP new classifications: Endocrine Disruptors (ED for human health
or for the environment), Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) & Persistent, Mobile & Toxic (PMT) that will be used to classify
chemicals and introduced in SDSs and on labels. |
| • |
New classification criteria for substances with more than one
constituent, for which the classification criteria of mixtures for certain hazards will be applied, based on the information of their
constituents. |
| • |
Inclusion of new rules in relation to notifications to the
public inventory of classification and labelling. |
| • |
Widespread use of drop-down labels. |
| • |
Specifying formatting requirements for labels with respect
to text font size, line spacing, and background color. |
| • |
Regulation of the use of digital labelling, although
not as an alternative to physical labelling. |
| • |
Expansion of the information to be included in online advertising
and sales. |
| • |
Determination of deadlines for updating labels due to
modifications in classification or other information. |
| • |
Clarification of the responsibility of distributors in the notification
of toxicological data sheets to poison centers. |
| • |
Regarding food ingredients, a US petition exists to increase the
levels of sodium alginate used in plant-based products. This has a positive impact on specific ICL formulas. |
| • |
The FDA has created a proposal to expand its standard of identities
for foods to include salt substitutes. ICL is working on a variety of products to use the approach. |
| • |
The EPA has released final guidance for pesticide submissions
for new outdoor uses that require endangered species act reviews. |
| • |
Like the EU, the US is implementing an Endocrine Disruptor Screening
Program (EDSP) with near-term strategies for implementation. From the experience ICL is gaining in the EU, the preparation of appropriate
data will be assured. The FDA has announced the annual monograph forecast which includes testing procedures for fluoride dentifrice products.
ICL is monitoring the forecast for any impact on its product. |
| • |
California's Proposition 65 proposed sweeping changes related
to warning requirements. |
| • |
Furthermore, we expect numerous anticipated rulemakings for PBTs
and NANO materials and will implement those in our respective strategies. |
| • |
In December 2023, ICL’s Polysulphate STD temporary registration
renewal request was rejected. We are in close contact with the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) regarding the possibility of extending the
registration for an interim period. Despite our efforts, the registration has not been extended. |
| • |
We have initiated the process of registering Polysulphate under
a new category as a soil conditioner. Registration applications were submitted to MARA China in 2024, with decisions expected in 2025.
|

| • |
Israel: under the Israeli Dead Sea Concession Law, 1961, as amended
in 1986 (the “Concession Law”), we have lease rights until March 31, 2030, for salt and carnallite ponds, pumping facilities
and productions plants at Sodom. We have other production facilities in Israel, situated on land with a long term lease, including the
Oron and Zin plants at Mishor Rotem of the Phosphate Solutions segment (the lease agreements for the Oron and Zin plants have been under
extension processes, since 2017 and 2023, respectively), production facilities at Naot Hovav of Industrial Products segment (leased until
2027-2075), as well as production, storage and transportation facilities together with chemicals and research laboratories at Kiryat Ata
that belong to the Growing Solutions segment (leased until 2046-2049). We also use warehouse, loading and unloading sites at Ashdod and
Eilat ports (leased until 2030). |
| • |
Europe: |
| • |
North and South America: |
| • |
Asia: |
| • |
Australia: ICL’s leased plant in Heatherton, Australia,
is a manufacturing site blending Food Phosphate products. |
|
Property Type |
Location |
Size (square feet) |
Products |
Owned/Leased |
|
Plant |
Mishor Rotem, Israel |
27,094,510 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Mishor Rotem, Israel |
10,763,910 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Neot Hovav, Israel |
9,601,591 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Zin, Israel |
8,484,123 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land (on a lease extension process)
|
|
Plant |
Kiryat Ata, Israel |
6,888,903 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Oron, Israel |
4,413,348 (not including phosphate reserve) |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land (on a lease extension process)
|
|
Evaportation ponds |
Sodom, Israel |
1,603,823K |
Salt and carnallite ponds |
Lease rights |
|
Plant |
13,099,679 |
Potash products (not including ponds and Magnesium plant)
|
Owned on leased land | |
|
Plant |
4,088,800 |
Magnesium products (Potash segment) |
Owned on leased land | |
|
Plant |
Sodom, Israel |
2,326,060 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Conveyor belt |
1,970,333 |
Transportation facility for Potash |
Owned on leased land |
|
Pumping stations |
Sodom, Israel |
1,180,496 |
Pumping station for the Potash segment |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
667,362 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land | |
|
Feeding canal |
5,974,980 |
Part of the pumping system for the Potash segment
|
Owned on leased land | |
|
Power plant |
645,856 |
Power and steam production for the Potash segment
|
Owned on leased land | |
|
Warehouse and loading facility |
Ashdod, Israel |
664,133 |
Warehouse for Potash and Phosphate Solutions products
|
Owned on leased land |
|
Headquarters |
Beer Sheva, Israel |
180,954 |
Company headquarters |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Mishor Rotem, Israel |
430,355 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Warehouse and loading facility |
Eilat, Israel |
152,557 |
Warehouse for Potash and Phosphate Solutions' products
|
Owned on leased land |
|
Headquarters |
Tel Aviv, Israel |
21,797 |
Company headquarters |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Catalonia, Spain |
48,491,416 |
Mines, manufacturing facilities and warehouses for Potash
segment |
Owned |
|
Port/warehouse |
Catalonia, Spain |
866,407 |
Potash and salt products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Totana, Spain |
2,210,261 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Cartagena, Spain |
209,853 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Warehouse and loading facility |
Cartagena, Spain |
184,342 |
Storage for Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Shandong, China |
692,045 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Headquarters |
Shanghai, China |
8,224 |
Company headquarters |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Kunming, Yunnan, China |
1,161,593 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned land |
|
Plant |
Kunming, Yunnan, China |
8,447,847 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Leased land |
|
Plant |
Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, China |
50,342 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Pumping station |
Kunming, Yunnan, China |
36,931 |
A pumping station for Phosphate Solutions |
Leased land |
|
Peat Moor |
Nutberry and Douglas Water, United Kingdom |
17,760,451 |
Peat mine (Growing Solutions segment) |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Cleveland, United Kingdom |
13,239,609 |
Polysulphate products (Growing Solutions segment)
|
Owned |
|
Warehouse and loading facility |
Cleveland, United Kingdom |
2,357,296 |
Polysulphate products (Growing Solutions segment)
|
Owned on leased land |
|
Peat Moor |
Creca, United Kingdom |
4,305,564 |
Peat mine (Growing Solutions segment) |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Nutberry, United Kingdom |
322,917 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Daventry, United Kingdom |
81,539 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned and leased |
|
Plant |
Terneuzen, the Netherlands |
1,206,527 |
Industrial Products' products |
Owned |
|
Plant & warehouse |
Lawford Heath, Rugby |
45,000 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Heerlen, the Netherlands |
481,802 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned and leased |
|
Plant |
Amsterdam, the Netherlands |
349,827 |
Growing Solutions products and logistics center |
Owned on leased land |
|
Headquarters |
Amsterdam, the Netherlands |
59,055 |
Company headquarters in Europe |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Gallipolis Ferry, West Virginia, United States |
1,742,400 |
Industrial Products' products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Lawrence, Kansas, United States |
179,689 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Carondelet, Missouri, United States |
190,095 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
North Charleston, South Carolina, United States |
100,000 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Fresno, California, United States |
92,000 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Headquarters |
St. Louis, Missouri, United States |
35,217 |
US Company headquarters |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Ludwigshafen, Germany |
2,534,319 |
Growing solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Ladenburg, Germany |
1,569,764 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Bitterfeld, Germany |
514,031 |
Industrial Products' products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Cajati, Brazil |
413,959 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil |
Phosphate plant: 137,573 Blending plant: 80,729 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land (free of charge) |
|
Plant |
Brazil Cidade Ocidental |
8,275 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Cruz Alta |
7,499 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Jacarei I |
879,248 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Jacarei II |
967,987 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Brazil Maua |
968,751 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Suzano I |
3,349,186 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Suzano II |
637,001 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
City of Cascavel, State of Parana - Brazil |
2,111 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Uberlandia |
263,716 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Belgium |
128,693 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Calais, France |
546,290 |
Industrial Products' products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Adel, Georgia, United States |
45,000 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Heatherton, Australia |
64,583 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Leased |

| • |
Rotem Amfert Negev Limited (“ICL Rotem”) is a wholly
owned subsidiary that operates three sites, Rotem, Oron and Zin. ICL Rotem has been mining phosphates in the Negev in Israel for more
than sixty years. Mining is conducted in accordance with a phosphate mining concession that covers an area of 177.8 sqkm, and which is
in effect until December 31, 2044. The concession was granted by Israel’s Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure, under the country’s
Mines Ordinance, in conjunction with mining authorizations, which are subject to the Israel Lands Authority jurisdiction. The concession
relates to quarries (phosphate rock), whereas the authorizations cover the use of land as an active mining area. The Rotem operation is
in the production stage. |
| • |
Dead Sea Works Ltd. (“ICL Dead Sea”) is a wholly owned
subsidiary that operates the Dead Sea concession which covers 652 sqkm, and which is in effect until March 31, 2030. DSW has 37 evaporation
ponds for production of potash, as well as other chemical products, located on the south-west shore of the Dead Sea’s southern basin
in Israel. DSW is in the production stage. |
| • |
ICL Iberia (“ICL Iberia”) is a wholly owned subsidiary
and holds mining rights granted by the Spanish government for two underground potash mines, Cabanasses and Vilafruns, located in Catalonia
in northeast Spain. ICL Iberia owns the land on which these surface facilities are located. The Cabanasses mine is operating and has been
in production for more than fifty years, while Vilafruns was placed on care and maintenance status in June 2020 following its discontinuation.
ICL Iberia holds 126 licenses for the extraction of rock salt and potash covering 693 sqkm, some of which valid until 2037 and the remainder
are effective until 2067. Cabanasses is in the production stage. |
| • |
Cleveland Potash Limited (“ICL Boulby”) is a wholly
owned subsidiary that operates an underground polyhalite mine, Boulby, located in the UK. ICL Boulby owns the freehold of approximately
2.41 sqkm of the mineral field, in addition to 24 onshore and 2 offshore mineral leases which cover a total area of 809.51 sqkm. Boulby
is in the production stage. |
| • |
Yunnan Phosphate Haikou (“YPH”) equally owned by ICL
and Yunnan Yuntianhua Corporation Ltd. ("YYTH"), and controlled by ICL, owns and operates the Haikou Phosphate Mine and processing facilities
in the Xishan district of China. YPH holds a phosphate mining license for the Haikou site covering 9.6 sqkm, which the Company operates
and is valid until January 2043. Haikou is in the production stage. |
|
Israel |
Out of Israel |
Total | |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
$ millions | ||
|
2024 |
82 |
9 |
91 |
|
2023 |
170 |
10 |
180 |
|
2022 |
95 |
8 |
103 |
|
Production Data for ICL Boulby
| |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Polyhalite hoisted (kt) |
719
|
1,028 |
947 |
|
Total Polyhalite Production (kt) |
721
|
1,009 |
953 |
|
Potash Production at Súria
Plant, ICL Iberia | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Ore hoisted from Cabanasses mine |
3,247
|
2,795 |
2,928 |
|
Head Grade % KCl |
26.7%
|
24.3% |
25.3% |
|
KCl Produced (kt) |
802
|
601 |
680 |
|
Product Grade % KCl |
95.5%
|
95.5% |
95.3% |
|
Total Mine Production of Raw Ore
at ICL Rotem | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Tonnes mined (kt) |
5,808
|
5,770 |
4,488 |
|
Grade (%P2O5
before / after beneficiation) |
23% / 31%
|
25% / 32% |
26% / 32% |
|
Product Produced After Processing
at ICL Rotem (kt) | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Phosphate Rock* |
2,375
|
2,309 |
2,170 |
|
Green Phosphoric Acid |
503
|
520 |
508 |
|
Fertilizers |
1,024
|
1,033 |
1,044 |
|
White Phosphoric Acid |
154
|
150 |
176 |
|
Specialty Fertilizers |
100
|
78 |
95 |
|
DSW Production (kt) |
|||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Potash |
3,700
|
3,819 |
4,011 |
|
Compacting plant* |
1,764
|
1,737 |
1,561 |
|
Bromine |
190
|
143 |
178 |
|
Cast Mg |
17
|
17 |
22 |
|
Total Mine Production of Raw Ore
at YPH | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Tonnes mined (kt) |
3,575
|
3,646 |
3,223 |
|
Grade (% P2O5
before/after beneficiation) |
21% / 28%
|
22% / 28% |
22% / 28% |
|
Product Produced After Processing
at YPH (kt) | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Phosphate Rock * |
2,715
|
2,657 |
2,497 |
|
Green Phosphoric Acid |
694
|
682 |
676 |
|
Fertilizers |
605
|
609 |
611 |
|
White Phosphoric Acid |
124
|
95 |
94 |
|
Specialty Fertilizers |
152
|
113 |
92 |
|
Measured Mineral Resources
|
Indicated Mineral Resources
|
Measured + Indicated Mineral Resources
|
Inferred Mineral Resources
| |||||||||||||
|
Tonnes
(Mt) |
Grades | Contained Mineral (Mt) | Contained Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt) |
Grades | Contained Mineral (Mt) | Contained Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt) |
Grades | Contained Mineral (Mt) | Contained Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt) |
Grades | Contained Mineral (Mt) | Contained Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) | |
|
Commodity: K2O |
||||||||||||||||
|
United Kingdom |
- |
- |
- |
- |
39.8 |
13.6% |
5.4 |
5.4 |
39.8 |
13.6% |
5.4 |
5.4 |
11.5 |
13.5% |
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
Boulby |
- |
- |
- |
- |
39.8 |
13.6% |
5.4 |
5.4 |
39.8 |
13.6% |
5.4 |
5.4 |
11.5 |
13.5% |
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
Total |
- |
- |
- |
- |
39.8 |
13.6% |
5.4 |
5.4 |
39.8 |
13.6% |
5.4 |
5.4 |
11.5 |
13.5% |
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
Commodity: KCl |
||||||||||||||||
|
Spain |
94.3 |
25.8% |
24.3 |
24.3 |
63.2 |
24.9% |
15.7 |
15.7 |
157.5 |
25.5% |
40.1 |
40.1 |
273.3 |
27.6% |
75.3 |
75.3 |
|
Cabanasses |
81.7 |
25.0% |
20.4 |
20.4 |
53.8 |
23.6% |
12.7 |
12.7 |
135.5 |
24.5% |
33.2 |
33.2 |
242.6 |
27.4% |
66.5 |
66.5 |
|
Vilafruns |
12.6 |
31.0% |
3.9 |
3.9 |
9.4 |
32.1% |
3.0 |
3.0 |
22.0 |
31.5% |
6.9 |
6.9 |
30.7 |
28.9% |
8.9 |
8.9 |
|
Israel |
297.9 |
20.8% |
62.0 |
62.0 |
1,642.4 |
21.2% |
348.2 |
348.2 |
1,940.3 |
21.1% |
409.4 |
409.4 |
463.0 |
21.2% |
98.2 |
98.2 |
|
DSW |
297.9 |
20.8% |
62.0 |
62.0 |
1,642.4 |
21.2% |
348.2 |
348.2 |
1,940.3 |
21.1% |
409.4 |
410.2 |
463.0 |
21.2% |
98.2 |
98.2 |
|
Total |
392.2 |
22.0% |
86.3 |
86.3 |
1,705.6 |
21.3% |
363.9 |
363.9 |
2,097.8 |
21.4% |
449.5 |
449.5 |
736.3 |
23.6% |
173.5 |
173.5 |
|
Commodity: P2O5
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Israel |
166.0 |
26.6% |
44.2 |
44.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
166.0 |
26.6% |
44.2 |
44.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Rotem |
78.5 |
28.8% |
22.6 |
22.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
78.5 |
28.8% |
22.6 |
22.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Zin |
46.1 |
25.3% |
11.7 |
11.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
46.1 |
25.3% |
11.7 |
11.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Oron |
41.4 |
24.0% |
9.9 |
9.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
41.4 |
24.0% |
9.9 |
9.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
China |
3.0 |
22.3% |
0.67 |
0.33 |
2.3 |
24.0% |
0.55 |
0.28 |
5.3 |
23.0% |
1.22 |
0.61 |
0.2 |
20.0% |
0.04 |
0.02 |
|
Haikou |
3.0 |
22.3% |
0.67 |
0.33 |
2.3 |
24.0% |
0.55 |
0.28 |
5.3 |
23.0% |
1.22 |
0.61 |
0.2 |
20.0% |
0.04 |
0.02 |
|
Total |
169.0 |
26.6% |
44.9 |
44.5 |
2.3 |
24.0% |
0.55 |
0.28 |
171.3 |
26.5% |
45.4 |
44.8 |
0.2 |
20.0% |
0.04 |
0.02 |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Resources for Boulby, Cabanasses,
Vilafruns, Rotem, Oron, Zin and Haikou is in-situ. The point of reference for Mineral Resources for DSW is contained within the carnallite
ponds following pumping from the northern Dead Sea basin. Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| (3) |
Mineral Resources for Boulby, Cabanasses, Vilafruns, Rotem, Oron,
Zin and DSW are reported on a 100% basis. For the Haikou mine, YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. The reported tonnages
and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5
attributable to ICL reflects the Company’s 50% interest. YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns a
50% minority interest in YPH. |
| (4) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (5) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using: |
| a. |
Boulby - a two-year average product price of $205/t FOB.
|
| b. |
Cabanasses and Vilafruns - a medium-long term potash price of
$373/t FOB. |
| c. |
DSW - a medium-long term potash price of $320/t FOB. |
| d. |
Rotem, Oron and Zin - an average of the previous two years’
prices of $1,178/t FOB for acid products and $424 /t FOB for fertilizer products. |
| e. |
Haikou - an average of the previous two years’ prices of
$639/t FOB for acid products and $438/t FOB for fertilizer products. |
|
Proven Reserves |
Probable Reserves |
Total Reserves | ||||||||||
|
Tonnes
(Mt) |
Grades |
Contained Mineral (Mt) |
Contained Mineral Attributable
to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt) |
Grades |
Contained Mineral (Mt) |
Contained Mineral Attributable
to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt) |
Grades |
Contained Mineral (Mt) |
Contained Mineral Attributable
to ICL (Mt) | |
|
Commodity: K2O
|
||||||||||||
|
United Kingdom |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7.4 |
13.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
7.4 |
13.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
ICL Boulby |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7.4 |
13.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
7.4 |
13.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Total |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7.4 |
13.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
7.4 |
13.9% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Commodity: KCl |
||||||||||||
|
Spain |
35.9 |
25.2% |
9.0 |
9.0 |
59.4 |
25.8% |
15.3 |
15.3 |
95.3 |
25.6% |
24.4 |
24.4 |
|
Cabanasses |
35.9 |
25.2% |
9.0 |
9.0 |
59.4 |
25.8% |
15.3 |
15.3 |
95.3 |
25.6% |
24.4 |
24.4 |
|
Vilafruns |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Israel |
122.7 |
20.6% |
25.3 |
25.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
122.7 |
20.6% |
25.3 |
25.3 |
|
DSW |
122.7 |
20.6% |
25.3 |
25.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
122.7 |
20.6% |
25.3 |
25.3 |
|
Total |
158.6 |
21.6% |
34.3 |
34.3 |
59.4 |
25.8% |
15.3 |
15.3 |
218.0 |
22.8% |
49.7 |
49.7 |
|
Commodity: P2O5
|
||||||||||||
|
Israel |
80.8 |
24.9% |
20.1 |
20.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
80.8 |
24.9% |
20.1 |
20.1 |
|
Rotem |
14.3 |
29.0% |
4.1 |
4.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14.3 |
29.0% |
4.1 |
4.1 |
|
Zin |
3.2 |
26.1% |
0.8 |
0.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3.2 |
26.1% |
0.8 |
0.8 |
|
Oron |
63.3 |
23.9% |
15.1 |
15.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
63.3 |
23.9% |
15.1 |
15.1 |
|
China |
44.5 |
21.6% |
9.6 |
4.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
44.5 |
21.6% |
9.6 |
4.8 |
|
Haikou |
44.5 |
21.6% |
9.6 |
4.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
44.5 |
21.6% |
9.6 |
4.8 |
|
Total |
125.3 |
23.7% |
29.7 |
24.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
125.3 |
23.7% |
29.7 |
24.9 |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the definitions
prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
The point of reference for Mineral Reserves for Boulby, Cabanasses
and DSW is defined as the point where ore is delivered to the processing plants. The point of reference for Mineral Reserves for Rotem,
Oron and Haikou is defined as the point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants. The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves
for Zin is defined as the point where ore is delivered to the mobile crusher. |
| (3) |
Mineral Reserves for Boulby, Cabanasses, Vilafruns, Rotem, Oron
and Zin are reported on a 100% basis. For Haikou, YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. The reported tonnages and grades are
on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5
attributable to ICL reflects the Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns
a 50% minority interest in YPH. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using: |
| a. |
Boulby - a two-year average product price of $205/t FOB.
|
| b. |
Cabanasses and Vilafruns - a medium-long term potash price of
$330/t FOB. |
| c. |
DSW - a two-year average product price of $296/t FOB. |
| d. |
Rotem and Oron - an average of the previous two years’ prices
of $1,178/t FOB for acid products and $424 /t FOB for fertilizer products. |
| e. |
Zin – a two-year average product price of $114/t FOB for
crushed phosphate rock. |
| f. |
Haikou - an average of the previous two years’ prices of
$639/t FOB for acid products and $438/t FOB for fertilizer products. |

|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
|
Polyhalite hoisted (kt) |
719
|
1,028 |
947 |
|
Total Polyhalite Production (kt) |
721
|
1,009 |
953 |
|
Amount (Mt) |
Grades/Qualities (K2O)
|
Cut-off grades (K2O)
|
Metallurgical recovery (K2O)
| |
|
Measured mineral resources |
- |
- |
12% |
100% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
39.8 |
13.6% |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral resources |
39.8 |
13.6% |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
11.5 |
13.5% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Boulby and reviewed and
accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Resources is in-situ. Mineral
Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Boulby. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density of
2.77 g/cm3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a two-year average product
price of $205/t FOB, which includes a range of products, and an exchange rate of £0.79 per dollar. |
|
Amount (Mt) |
Grades/Qualities (K2O)
|
Cut-off grades (K2O)
|
Metallurgical recovery (K2O)
| |
|
Proven mineral reserves |
- |
- |
12% |
100% |
|
Probable mineral reserves |
7.4 |
13.9% |
||
|
Total mineral reserves |
7.4 |
13.9% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the definitions
prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Boulby and reviewed and
accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at
the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Boulby. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding |
| (6) |
A minimum mining width of 6m was used. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a two-year average product
price of $205/t FOB, which includes a range of products, and an exchange rate of £0.79 per dollar. |
|
Potash Production at Súria
Plant, ICL Iberia | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Ore hoisted from Cabanasses mine |
3,247
|
2,795 |
2,928 |
|
Head Grade % KCl |
26.7%
|
24.3% |
25.3% |
|
KCl Produced (kt) |
802
|
601 |
680 |
|
Product Grade % KCl |
95.5%
|
95.5% |
95.3% |
|
Amount (Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities (KCl) |
Cut-off grades (KCI) |
Metallurgical recovery (KCI)
| |
|
Measured mineral resources |
81.7 |
25.0% |
10% |
86.5% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
53.8 |
23.6% |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral resources |
135.5 |
24.5% |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
242.6 |
27.4% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and
accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for Mineral Resources is in-situ. Mineral
Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density of
2.1 t/m3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash
price of $373/t FOB and an exchange rate of €0.91 per US dollar. |
|
Amount (Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities (KCl) |
Cut-off grades (KCI) |
Metallurgical recovery (KCI)
| |
|
Measured mineral resources |
12.6 |
31.0% |
10% |
86.5% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
9.4 |
32.1% |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral resources |
22.0 |
31.5% |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
30.7 |
28.9% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and
accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
Mineral Resources are reported in-situ and are exclusive of Mineral
Reserves. |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density of
2.1 t/m3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash
price of $373/t FOB and an exchange rate of €0.91 per US dollar. |
|
Amount (Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities (KCl) |
Cut-off grades (KCI) |
Metallurgical recovery (KCI)
| |
|
Proven mineral reserves |
35.9 |
25.2% |
19% |
86.5% |
|
Probable mineral reserves |
59.4 |
25.8% |
||
|
Total mineral reserves |
95.3 |
25.6% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the definitions
prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and
accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at
the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
A minimum mining width of 5m was used. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using medium-long term potash price
of $330/t FOB and an exchange rate of €0.91 per US dollar. |
| • |
White phosphate rock from Oron is mined and processed at the Oron
beneficiation plant and the phosphate concentrate is transported to the Rotem plant for further processing into higher added value products
such as white phosphoric acids for food applications. |
| • |
Low organic phosphate rock from Rotem mine is processed at Rotem
plant to produce green (impure) phosphoric acids for agricultural applications. |
| • |
Bituminous phosphate rock from the center of the Rotem deposit
is mined and used to produce fertilizers at Rotem plant. Further significant bituminous phosphate exists within the deeper parts of the
Rotem deposit, however, only limited mining of this has occurred to date due to the presence of thick overburden (10 to 50 meters) containing
horizons of oil shale. The oil shale contains 12% to 21% organic matter and is susceptible to self-combustion when exposed by mining.
|
| • |
The Oron beneficiation plant will be reconfigured to allow brown
and low organic phosphate rock to be mined and processed at Oron and the phosphate concentrate transported to the Rotem plant for use
in the production of green phosphoric acid. In addition, brown phosphate rock from Oron will be transported by truck to the Rotem beneficiation
plant and used to produce additional green phosphoric acid and fertilizers after 2029. |
| • |
The Rotem beneficiation plant will process bituminous phosphate
rock mined from Rotem and the concentrate used in the production of white phosphoric acid. Overburden containing horizons of oil shale
will be stripped to allow access to the underlying bituminous phosphate rock. An upper limit of around 20% of the total overburden will
be allowed to contain oil shale and this will be transported to designated waste dumps and capped using marl rock. |
| • |
Bituminous phosphate rock from Rotem will also continue to be
used to produce fertilizers. |
| • |
Mining of the available bituminous phosphate rock at Rotem to
produce white phosphoric acid is planned to be completed by the end of 2029 and the remainder of white phosphate at Oron will be used
for specialty fertilizers. |
| • |
Small scale mining at Zin of approximately 0.2 Mtpa of low organic
phosphate rock is planned to continue for the life of mine using in-pit crushing and screening and final processing at the Oron beneficiation
plant. |
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Tonnes mined (kt) |
5,808
|
5,770 |
4,488 |
|
Grade (%P2O5
before / after beneficiation) |
23% / 31%
|
25% / 32% |
26% / 32% |
|
Product Produced After Processing
at ICL Rotem (kt) | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Phosphate Rock* |
2,375
|
2,309 |
2,170 |
|
Green Phosphoric Acid |
503
|
520 |
508 |
|
Fertilizers |
1,024
|
1,033 |
1,044 |
|
White Phosphoric Acid |
154
|
150 |
176 |
|
Specialty Fertilizers |
100
|
78 |
95 |
|
Category |
White Phosphate |
Low Organic Phosphate |
High Organic & Brown Phosphate
|
Bituminous Phosphate |
Total |
Grades/
Qualities |
Cut-off grades |
Metallurgical recovery |
|
|
(millions of tonnes) |
(P2O5)
| ||||||||
|
Rotem |
Measured |
- |
15.9 |
- |
62.6 |
78.5 |
28.8% |
25% |
54% and 69% |
|
Indicated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
M + Ind |
- |
15.9 |
- |
62.6 |
78.5 |
28.8% | |||
|
Inferred |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
Zin |
Measured |
- |
11.8 |
10.0 |
24.3 |
46.1 |
25.3% |
23% |
56% |
|
Indicated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
M + Ind |
- |
11.8 |
10.0 |
24.3 |
46.1 |
25.3% | |||
|
Inferred |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
Oron |
Measured |
1.3 |
- |
7.1 |
33.0 |
41.4 |
24.0% |
20% |
59% and 60% |
|
Indicated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
M + Ind |
1.3 |
- |
7.1 |
33.0 |
41.4 |
24.0% | |||
|
Inferred |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
Total |
Measured |
1.3 |
27.7 |
17.1 |
119.9 |
166.0 |
26.6% |
||
|
Indicated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
|
M + Ind |
1.3 |
27.7 |
17.1 |
119.9 |
166.0 |
26.6% |
|||
|
Inferred |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Rotem and reviewed and
accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Resources is in-situ. Mineral
Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Rotem. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities ranging
from 1.8 to 1.9 t/m3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average of the previous
two years’ prices of $1,178/t FOB for acid products and $424/t FOB for fertilizer products, and exchange rates of NIS 3.58 per US
dollar and €0.91 per US dollar. |
| • |
Rotem site: The life of
mine at Rotem runs from 2025 to 2029 (inclusive) based on 1.3 Mt of reserves of low organic phosphate that will be mined in 2025 and 13
Mt of reserves of bituminous phosphate for production of fertilizers and white phosphoric acid, with an annual average mining rate of
2.6 Mt in the years 2025-2029. Reserves of bituminous phosphate are only reported for areas in which the total overburden required to
be mined contains a maximum of around 20% oil shale. Significant resources (62.6 Mt) of bituminous phosphate are present beneath an overburden
containing higher amounts of oil shale and the Company plans further technical studies to assess the potential for mining and stockpiling
this overburden |
| • |
Oron site: The life of
mine at Oron runs from 2025 to 2040 (inclusive) based on 3.0 Mt reserves of white phosphate rock, with an annual average mining rate of
0.2 Mt for the years 2025-2040, as well as 60.3 Mt of reserves of brown and low organic phosphate, of which 0.6 Mt will be mined in 2025
and 30 Mt in the years 2026-2040 at an annual average mining rate of 2 Mt. In the years 2030-2040, 29.7 Mt of brown phosphate rock will
be transported to Rotem beneficiation plant for processing to produce additional green phosphoric acid and fertilizers at an annual average
mining rate of 2.7 Mt. |
| • |
Zin site: The life of mine
at Zin runs from 2025 to 2040 (inclusive) based on: reserves of 3.2 Mt low organic phosphate for small-scale product sales (using minor
mining operation equipment located inside the open pit without utilizing the Zin beneficiation plant). Additional resources (11.8 million
tonnes) of low organic phosphate are available at Zin should these be required by the Company in the future. |
|
Category |
White Phosphate |
Low Organic Phosphate |
High Organic & Brown Phosphate
|
Bituminous Phosphate |
Total |
Grades/
Qualities |
Cut-off grades |
Metallurgical recovery |
|
|
(millions of tons) |
(P2O5)
| ||||||||
|
Rotem |
Proven |
- |
1.3 |
- |
13.0 |
14.3 |
29.0% |
25% |
54% and 69% |
|
Probable |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
|
Zin |
Proven |
- |
3.2 |
- |
- |
3.2 |
26.1% |
23% |
50% |
|
Probable |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
|
Oron |
Proven |
3.0 |
2.4 |
57.9 |
- |
63.3 |
23.9% |
20% |
59% and 60% |
|
Probable |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
|
Total |
Proven |
3.0 |
6.9 |
57.9 |
13.0 |
80.8 |
24.9% |
||
|
Probable |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the definitions
prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Rotem and reviewed and
accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves for Rotem and
Oron is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants, for Zin it is defined at the point where ore is delivered
to the mobile crusher. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Rotem. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding |
| (6) |
A minimum mining width of 0.5m was used. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average of the previous
two years’ prices of $1,178/t FOB for acid products and $424/t FOB for fertilizer products and $114/t FOB for phosphate rock from
Zin, and exchange rates of NIS 3.58 per US dollar and €0.91 per US dollar. |
|
Production (kt) |
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Potash |
3,700
|
3,819 |
4,011 |
|
Compacting plant* |
1,764
|
1,737 |
1,561 |
|
Bromine |
190
|
143 |
178 |
|
Cast Mg |
17
|
17 |
22 |
| 1. |
Determination of the pumping rate of brines from the northern
Dead Sea area. |
| 2. |
Determination of expected recovery of product based upon:
|
| a. |
Ability to determine composition and consistency of supply.
|
| b. |
Ability to predict consistency of evaporation and mineral precipitation.
|
| 3. |
Determination of Mineral Resource classification is based upon:
|
| a. |
Any variation in the supply rate and composition. |
| b. |
Any variation in the return flow of brines to the northern Dead
Sea basin to assess efficiency and consistency of process. |
| c. |
Variation in the precipitation of mineral amounts. |
| 4. |
Assessment of potential changes to any of the above factors.
|
|
Classification |
Amount (Mt) |
Average Grade (KCl) |
Cut-off grades
(KCl) |
Metallurgical recovery
(KCl) |
|
Measured mineral resources |
297.9 |
20.8% |
0% |
80.4% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
1,642.4 |
21.2% |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral resources |
1,940.3 |
21.1% |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
463.0 |
21.2% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Dead Sea and reviewed
and accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
Mineral Resources are reported as being contained within the carnallite
ponds following pumping from the northern Dead Sea basin. |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are reported on an in-situ basis and are exclusive
of Mineral Reserves. |
| (5) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Dead Sea.
|
| (6) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (7) |
Dead Sea Works is a dredging operation, and therefore no minimum
mining width has been applied. |
| (8) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities of
1.67 t/m3.for carnallite and 2.16 t/m3 for salt. |
| (9) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash
price of $320/t FOB and an exchange rate of NIS 3.58 per US dollar. |
|
Amount (Mt) |
Average Grade (KCl) |
Cut-off grades
(KCl) |
Metallurgical recovery
(KCl) | |
|
Proven mineral reserves |
122.7 |
20.6% |
0% |
80.4% |
|
Probable mineral reserves |
- |
- |
||
|
Total mineral reserves |
122.7 |
20.6% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the definitions
prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Dead Sea and reviewed and
accepted by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at
the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Dead Sea.
|
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Dead Sea Works is a dredging operation, and therefore no minimum
mining width has been applied. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a two-year average product
price of $296/t FOB and an exchange rate of NIS 3.58 per US dollar. |

| • |
Grade I (highest grade) > 30% P2O5
- This category of phosphate is weathered and most of the carbonates have been dissolved. It is soft and easy to mine, requiring no blasting.
However, its occurrence is in small patches, requiring highly selective mining. This category comprises less than 10% of the Haikou deposit
and is fed directly to the scrubbing plant for processing. |
| • |
Grade II 24%-30% P2O5
– Harder phosphate material requiring blasting and crushing prior to further processing at the scrubbing plant. This category comprises
around 25% of the Haikou deposit. |
| • |
Grade III 15%-24% P2O5
– This is the hardest rock and requires blasting, crushing, and grinding before further processing. |
|
Total Mine Production of Raw Ore
at YPH | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Tonnes mined (kt) |
3,575
|
3,646 |
3,223 |
|
Grade (% P2O5 before/after beneficiation) |
21% / 28%
|
22% / 28% |
22% / 28% |
| (1) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
|
Product Produced After Processing
at YPH (kt) | |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
Phosphate Rock *
|
2,715
|
2,657 |
2,497 |
|
Green Phosphoric Acid |
694
|
682 |
676 |
|
Fertilizers |
605
|
609 |
611 |
|
White Phosphoric Acid |
124
|
95 |
94 |
|
Specialty Fertilizers |
152
|
113 |
92 |
|
Amount (Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities (P2O5)
|
Contained P2O5
(Mt) |
Contained P2O5
Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Cut-off grades (P2O5)
|
Metallurgical recovery (P2O5)
| |
|
Measured mineral resources |
3.0 |
22.3% |
0.67 |
0.33 |
15% |
86.9% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
2.3 |
24.0% |
0.55 |
0.28 |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral resources |
5.3 |
23.0% |
1.22 |
0.61 |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
0.2 |
20.0% |
0.04 |
0.02 |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by YPH and reviewed and accepted
by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for Mineral Resources is defined on an
in-situ basis. Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| (4) |
YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of ICL. The reported tonnages
and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5
attributable to ICL reflects the Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns
a 50% minority interest in YPH. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities ranging
from 2.29 to 2.78 t/m3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average of the previous
two years’ prices of $639/t FOB for acid products and $438/t FOB for fertilizer products and an exchange rate of 7.20 RMB per US
dollar. |
|
Amount (Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities (P2O5)
|
Contained P2O5
(Mt) |
Contained P2O5
Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Cut-off grades (P2O5)
|
Metallurgical recovery (P2O5)
| |
|
Proven mineral reserves |
44.5 |
21.6% |
9.6 |
4.8 |
15% |
86.9% |
|
Probable mineral reserves |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
Total mineral reserves |
44.5 |
21.6% |
9.6 |
4.8 |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the definitions
prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by YPH and reviewed and accepted
by WAI. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for Mineral Reserves is defined at the
point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants. |
| (4) |
YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of ICL. The reported tonnages
and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5
attributable to ICL reflects the Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns
a 50% minority interest in YPH. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
A minimum mining width of 1.0m was used. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average of the previous
two years’ prices of $639/t FOB for acid products and $438/t FOB for fertilizer products and an exchange rate of 7.20 RMB per US
dollar. |
| A. |
OPERATING RESULTS |
|
Average prices |
2024 |
2023 |
VS 2023 | |
|
Granular potash – Brazil |
CFR spot
($ per tonne) |
299 |
392 |
(23.7)% |
|
Granular potash – Northwest Europe |
CIF spot/contract
(€ per tonne) |
349 |
496 |
(29.6)% |
|
Standard potash – Southeast Asia |
CFR spot
($ per tonne) |
294 |
381 |
(22.8)% |
|
Potash imports |
||||
|
To Brazil |
million tonnes |
13.4 |
13.2 |
1.5% |
|
To China |
million tonnes |
12.6 |
11.7 |
7.7% |
|
To India |
million tonnes |
3.1 |
2.8 |
10.7% |
|
Average prices |
$ per tonne |
2024 |
2023 |
VS 2023 |
|
DAP |
CFR India Spot |
587
|
569 |
3% |
|
TSP |
CFR Brazil Spot |
465
|
434 |
7% |
|
SSP |
CPT Brazil inland 18-20% P2O5
Spot |
283
|
290 |
(2)% |
|
Sulphur |
Bulk FOB Adnoc monthly contract |
100
|
104 |
(4)% |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
| ||||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
||
|
US$ millions | ||||
|
Operating income |
775 |
1,141 |
3,516 |
|
Charges related to the security situation in Israel (1)
|
57
|
14 |
- |
|
Impairment and write-off of assets and provision for site
closure (2) |
35
|
49 |
- |
|
Provision for early retirement (3) |
4
|
16 |
- |
|
Legal proceedings, dispute, and other settlement expenses
(4) |
2 |
(2) |
22 |
|
Divestment related items and transaction costs (5)
|
- |
- |
(29) |
|
Total adjustments to operating income |
98 |
77 |
(7) |
|
Adjusted operating income |
873 |
1,218 |
3,509 |
|
Net income attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
407
|
647 |
2,159 |
|
Total adjustments to operating income |
98
|
77 |
22 |
|
Total tax adjustments (6) |
(21) |
(9) |
198 |
|
Total adjusted net income - shareholders of the Company
|
484 |
715 |
2,379 |
| (1) |
For 2024 and 2023, reflects charges relating to the security situation
in Israel. |
| (2) |
For 2024, reflects mainly a write-off of assets resulting from
the closure of small sites in Israel and Turkey, and an impairment of assets due to a regulatory decision that mandated the cessation
of a certain project. For 2023, reflects mainly a write-off of assets related to restructuring at certain sites, including site closures
and facility modifications as part of the Company’s global efficiency plan. |
| (3) |
For 2024 and 2023, reflects provisions for early retirement, due
to restructuring at certain sites, as part of the Company’s global efficiency plan |
| (4) |
For 2024, reflects reimbursement of arbitration costs associated
with the Ethiopian potash project. For 2023, reflects a reversal of a legal provision. For 2022, reflects mainly the costs of a mediation
settlement regarding the claims related to the Ashalim Stream incident. |
| (5) |
For 2022, reflects a capital gain related to the sale of an asset
in Israel and the Company’s divestment of a 50%-owned joint venture, Novetide |
| (6) |
For 2024 and 2023, reflects the tax impact of adjustments made
to operating income. For 2022, reflects tax expenses in respect of prior years following a settlement with Israel’s Tax Authority
regarding Israel's surplus profit levy, which outlines understandings for the calculation of the levy, including the measurement of fixed
assets, as well as the tax impact of adjustments made to operating income. |
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
%
Increase
(Decrease) | ||
|
2024 |
2023 | ||
|
$ millions |
$ millions |
||
|
Sales |
6,841
|
7,536 |
(9)% |
|
Cost of sales |
4,585 |
4,865 |
(6)% |
|
Gross profit |
2,256
|
2,671 |
(16)% |
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses |
1,114
|
1,093 |
2% |
|
General and administrative expenses |
259
|
260 |
(0)% |
|
Research and development expenses |
69
|
71 |
(3)% |
|
Other expenses |
60
|
128 |
(53)% |
|
Other income |
(21) |
(22) |
(5)% |
|
Operating income |
775 |
1,141 |
(32)% |
|
Finance expenses |
181
|
259 |
(30)% |
|
Finance income |
(41) |
(91) |
(55)% |
|
Finance expenses, net |
140
|
168 |
(17)% |
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees |
1 |
1 |
0% |
|
Income before taxes on income |
636
|
974 |
(35)% |
|
Taxes on income |
172 |
287 |
(40)% |
|
Net income |
464
|
687 |
(32)% |
|
Net income attributable to the non-controlling interests
|
57 |
40 |
43% |
|
Net income attributable to the shareholders of the
Company |
407 |
647 |
(37)% |
|
Earnings per share attributable to the shareholders
of the Company: |
|||
|
Basic earnings per share (in dollars) |
0.32 |
0.50 |
(36)% |
|
Diluted earnings per share (in dollars) |
0.32 |
0.50 |
(36)% |
|
Sales |
Expenses |
Operating income |
||
|
$ millions |
||||
|
FY 2023 figures |
7,536
|
(6,395)
|
1,141
|
|
|
Total adjustments FY 2023* |
- |
77 |
77 |
|
|
Adjusted FY 2023 figures |
7,536
|
(6,318)
|
1,218
|
|
|
Quantity |
412
|
(233)
|
179
|
![]() |
|
Price |
(1,050)
|
- |
(1,050)
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
(57)
|
104
|
47
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
334
|
334
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
29
|
29
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
1
|
1
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
- |
115 |
115 |
![]() |
|
Adjusted FY 2024 figures |
6,841
|
(5,968)
|
873
|
|
|
Total adjustments FY 2024* |
- |
(98) |
(98) |
|
|
FY 2024 figures |
6,841 |
(6,066) |
775 |
| - |
Sales –
The Company's sales decreased by $695 million compared to 2023. The decrease was due to a $94 decrease in the potash price (CIF) per tonne
year-over-year, as well as a decrease in selling prices of bromine-based industrial solutions, bromine and phosphorous-based flame retardants,
white phosphoric acid (WPA), phosphate-based food additives, salts, specialty agriculture products, as well as FertilizerpluS products.
In addition, a decrease was recorded in sales volumes of clear brine fluids and fertilizers, together with the depreciation of the average
exchange rate of the Brazilian real and the Chinese Yuan against the US dollar. This decrease was partially offset by higher sales volumes
of bromine and phosphorous-based flame retardants, elemental bromine, magnesium, specialty agriculture products, turf and ornamental products,
MAP used as raw material for energy storage solutions and salts, together with higher selling prices of phosphate fertilizers. |
| - |
Cost of sales –
Cost of sales decreased by $280 million compared to 2023. The decrease was due to lower prices of commodity fertilizers, sulphur and caustic
soda, as well as a depreciation of the average exchange rate of the Brazilian real, the Israeli shekel and the Chinese Yuan against the
US dollar, as well as the positive impact of our hedging strategy on operational costs, together with decreased electricity and gas prices.
The decrease was partially offset by higher sales volumes of bromine and phosphorous-based flame retardants, elemental bromine, magnesium,
MAP used as raw material for energy storage solutions, salts, specialty agriculture products and turf and ornamental products. |
| - |
Selling and marketing
– Expenses increased by $21 million compared to 2023, mainly due to higher labor costs, partially offset by the depreciation of
the average exchange rate of the Brazilian real against the US dollar. |
| - |
General and administrative
– Expenses decreased by $1 million compared to 2023, mainly due to the depreciation of the average exchange rate of the Brazilian
Real and the Israeli shekel against the US dollar, partially offset by higher labor costs. |
| - |
Research and Development
– Expenses decreased by $2 million compared to 2023, mainly due to lower labor costs. |
| - |
Other expenses, net –
Other expenses, net, decreased by $67 million compared to 2023. The decrease was primarily due to higher expenses in 2023 associated with
asset write-offs and provisions for early retirement as part of restructuring efforts at specific sites. |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
$ millions |
NIS millions |
|
2024 |
364 |
1,348 |
|
2023 |
652 |
2,399 |
|
2022 |
1,488 |
4,988 |
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions |
|
Segment Sales |
1,239
|
1,227 |
|
Sales to external customers |
1,220
|
1,206 |
|
Sales to internal customers |
19
|
21 |
|
Segment Operating Income |
224
|
220 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
57
|
57 |
|
Segment EBITDA |
281
|
277 |
|
Capital expenditures |
94
|
91 |
|
Year Ended December 31,
| ||
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions | |
|
Asia |
438
|
361 |
|
Europe |
388
|
430 |
|
North America |
327
|
341 |
|
South America |
20
|
23 |
|
Rest of the world |
47 |
51 |
|
Total |
1,220 |
1,206 |
|
Sales |
Expenses |
Operating income |
||
|
$ millions |
||||
|
FY 2023 figures |
1,227
|
(1,007)
|
220
|
|
|
Quantity |
191
|
(114)
|
77
|
![]() |
|
Price |
(177)
|
- |
(177)
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
(2)
|
14
|
12
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
14
|
14
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
7
|
7
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
(1)
|
(1)
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
- |
72 |
72 |
![]() |
|
FY 2024 figures |
1,239 |
(1,015) |
224 |
| - |
Quantity –
The positive impact on operating income was primarily related to an increase in sales volumes of bromine and phosphorus-based flame retardants,
elemental bromine and specialty minerals. This impact was partially offset by lower sales volumes of clear brine fluids and phosphorus-based
industrial solutions. |
| - |
Price –
The negative impact on operating income was due to lower selling prices of bromine based industrial solution, bromine and phosphorus-based
flame retardants and specialty minerals. |
| - |
Exchange rates
– The favorable impact on operating income was mainly due to the positive impact on operational costs resulting from the depreciation
of the average exchange rate of the Israeli shekel against the US dollar. |
| - |
Raw materials
– The positive impact on operating income was mainly due to decreased costs of Bisphenol A (BPA). |
| - |
Energy –
The positive impact on operating income was due to lower prices of electricity and gas. |
| - |
Operating and other expenses
– The positive impact on operating income was primarily related to operational efficiencies due to higher production. |
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions |
|
Segment Sales |
1,656
|
2,182 |
|
Potash sales to external customers
|
1,237
|
1,693 |
|
Potash sales to internal customers
|
95
|
129 |
|
Other and eliminations (1) |
324
|
360 |
|
Gross Profit |
650
|
1,171 |
|
Segment Operating Income |
250
|
668 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
242
|
175 |
|
Segment EBITDA (2) |
492
|
843 |
|
Capital expenditures |
332
|
384 |
|
Potash price - CIF ($ per tonne) |
299
|
393 |
| (1) |
Primarily includes salt produced in Spain, metal magnesium-based
products, chlorine, and sales of excess electricity produced by ICL’s power plant at the Dead Sea in Israel. |
| (2) |
The Potash segment's EBITDA increased by $65 million in 2024 due
to higher depreciation expenses resulting from additions to Property, Plant and Equipment. |
|
Year Ended December 31,
| ||
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions | |
|
Europe |
405
|
529 |
|
South America |
401
|
523 |
|
Asia |
352
|
539 |
|
North America |
202
|
260 |
|
Rest of the world |
102 |
122 |
|
Total |
1,462 |
1,973 |
|
Sales |
Expenses |
Operating income |
||
|
$ millions |
||||
|
FY 2023 figures |
2,182
|
(1,514)
|
668
|
|
|
Quantity |
47
|
(30)
|
17
|
![]() |
|
Price |
(576)
|
- |
(576)
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
3
|
18
|
21
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
2
|
2
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
14
|
14
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
2
|
2
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
- |
102 |
102 |
![]() |
|
FY 2024 figures |
1,656 |
(1,406) |
250 |
| - |
Quantity –
The positive impact on operating income was primarily related to an increase in sales volumes of magnesium, as well as an increase in
sales volumes of potash in Europe, India and the US, partially offset by lower sales volumes of potash in China and Brazil. |
| - |
Price –
The negative impact on operating income resulted primarily from a decrease of $94 in the potash price (CIF) per tonne, year-over-year.
|
| - |
Exchange rates
– The favorable impact on operating income was mainly due to a positive impact on operational costs resulting from the depreciation
of the average exchange rate of the Israeli shekel against the US dollar, as well as the positive impact on sales resulting mainly from
the appreciation of the average exchange rate of the euro against the US dollar. |
| - |
Energy –
The positive impact on operating income was primarily due to decreased electricity and gas prices. |
| - |
Operating and other expenses
– The positive impact on operating income was primarily related to lower operational costs. |
|
Thousands of Tonnes |
2024 |
2023 |
|
Production |
4,502
|
4,420 |
|
Total sales (including internal sales) |
4,556
|
4,683 |
|
Closing inventory |
229
|
284 |
| - |
Production –
Production was 82 thousand tonnes higher year-over-year, mainly due to operational improvements in Spain, which outweighed operational
challenges and war related issues in the Dead Sea. |
| - |
Sales – The
quantity of potash sold was 127 thousand tonnes lower year-over-year, mainly due to decreased sales volumes in China and Brazil, partially
offset by higher sales volumes in Europe, India and the US. |
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions |
|
Segment Sales |
2,215
|
2,350 |
|
Sales to external customers |
2,049
|
2,141 |
|
Sales to internal customers |
166
|
209 |
|
Segment Operating Income |
358
|
350 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
191
|
207 |
|
Segment EBITDA |
549
|
557 |
|
Capital expenditures |
340
|
270 |
| (1) |
In alignment with the Company’s efficiency plan, which includes
a change of reporting responsibilities, as of January 2024, the results of a non-phosphate related business were allocated from the Phosphate
Solutions segment to Other Activities. Comparative figures have been restated to reflect the organizational change in the reportable segments.
|
| (2) |
For 2024, Phosphate Specialties accounted for $1,285 million of
segment sales, $183 million of operating income, $48 million of D&A and $231 million of EBITDA, while Phosphate Commodities accounted
for $930 million of segment sales, $175 million of operating income, $143 million of D&A and represented $318 million of EBITDA.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
| ||
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions | |
|
Asia |
594
|
576 |
|
North America |
567
|
613 |
|
Europe |
478
|
482 |
|
South America |
306
|
367 |
|
Rest of the world |
104 |
103 |
|
Total |
2,049 |
2,141 |
|
Sales |
Expenses |
Operating income |
||
|
$ millions |
||||
|
FY 2023 figures |
2,350
|
(2,000)
|
350
|
|
|
Quantity |
79
|
(25)
|
54
|
![]() |
|
Price |
(208)
|
- |
(208)
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
(6)
|
29
|
23
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
129
|
129
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
5
|
5
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
5 |
5 |
![]() |
|
FY 2024 figures |
2,215 |
(1,857) |
358 |
| - |
Quantity –
The positive impact on operating income was due to higher sales volumes of MAP used as raw materials for energy storage solutions, salts
and phosphate-based food additives. This was partially offset by lower sales volumes of phosphate fertilizers and white phosphoric acid
(WPA). |
| - |
Price –
The negative impact on operating income primarily related to lower selling prices of WPA, phosphate-based food additives, salts and MAP
used as raw materials for energy storage solutions. This was partially offset by higher selling prices of phosphate fertilizers.
|
| - |
Exchange rates
– The favorable impact on operating income was mainly due to the positive impact on operational costs resulting from the depreciation
of the average exchange rate of the Israeli shekel and the Chinese yuan against the US dollar, which exceeded the negative impact on sales
resulting from the depreciation of the average exchange rate of the Chinese yuan against the US dollar. |
| - |
Raw materials
– The positive impact on operating income was due to lower costs of sulphur, caustic soda, potassium hydroxide (KOH) and ammonia.
|
| - |
Energy –
The positive impact on operating income was due to decreased gas and electricity prices. |
| - |
Transportation
– The positive impact on operating income was due to a decrease in inland transportation costs. |
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions |
|
Segment Sales |
1,950
|
2,073 |
|
Sales to external customers |
1,932
|
2,047 |
|
Sales to internal customers |
18
|
26 |
|
Segment Operating Income |
128
|
51 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
74
|
68 |
|
Segment EBITDA |
202
|
119 |
|
Capital expenditures |
98
|
92 |
|
Year Ended December 31,
| ||
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions | |
|
Europe |
727
|
741 |
|
South America |
627
|
752 |
|
Asia |
248
|
255 |
|
North America |
168
|
135 |
|
Rest of the world |
162 |
164 |
|
Total |
1,932 |
2,047 |
|
Sales |
Expenses |
Operating income |
||
|
$ millions |
||||
|
FY 2023 figures |
2,073
|
(2,022)
|
51
|
|
|
Quantity |
79
|
(49)
|
30
|
![]() |
|
Price |
(149)
|
- |
(149)
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
(53)
|
44
|
(9)
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
225
|
225
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
5
|
5
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
(6)
|
(6)
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
- |
(19) |
(19) |
![]() |
|
FY 2024 figures |
1,950 |
(1,822) |
128 |
| - |
Quantity –
The positive impact on operating income was primarily related to higher sales volumes of turf and ornamental products and FertilizerpluS
products, as well as specialty agriculture and products. |
| - |
Price –
The negative impact on operating income was due to lower selling prices of specialty agriculture and FertilizerpluS products, as well
as turf and ornamental products. |
| - |
Exchange rates
– The unfavorable impact on operating income was due to the negative impact on sales resulted from the depreciation of the average
exchange rate of the Brazilian real against the US dollar, which exceeded the positive impact on operational costs. |
| - |
Raw materials
– The positive impact on operating income was primarily related to lower costs of commodity fertilizers and potassium hydroxide
(KOH). |
| - |
Energy - The positive
impact on operating income was primarily due to decreased electricity prices. |
| - |
Transportation
- The negative impact on operating income was due to an increase in marine and inland transportation costs. |
| - |
Operating and other expenses
– The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to higher maintenance and operational costs. |

|
Year Ended December 31,
| ||
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions | |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,468
|
1,710 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
(694)
|
(853) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
(846)
|
(837) |
| • |
We continue to develop magnesia-based product formulations to
fulfill unmet needs in the markets. We introduced our new formulation, FruitMag™, which serves as a firming agent for post-harvest
treatment of citrus fruits. We are also marketing a product that enables aluminum salt-free deodorant, known as CareMag® D, which
is already being marketed by several leading international companies. We launched a magnesium-based formulation, TextiMag®, designed
to absorb body odors and increase skin wellness with a textile coating. In addition, we are also developing a new formulation package
of skin treatments including face mask, serum and swallowing tablets, all based on magnesium. |
| • |
We are developing brominated electrolytes and phosphorus-based
active salt for electrolytes for battery producers. |
| • |
We are developing and promoting sustainable water treatment products,
such as CDA technology for pulp and paper, reverse osmosis membranes and cooling towers. |
| • |
We are using our Bromoquel® product, a new solution designed
to treat bromine leakage, at our plants and also commercially distributing the product. |
| • |
We are developing a new flame-retardant product for the textile
market which is currently in the market penetration stage. |
| • |
We are continuing to develop "low loss" flame retardants for intensive
computing technologies, such as AI, datacenters and more. We are collaborating with market leaders in this field. |
| • |
We continue to develop battery safety solutions for the lithium-ion
batteries in the EV market. |
| • |
We are continuing our R&D efforts to increase the sustainability
of our flame-retardant portfolio by developing Circular Economy solutions and new sustainable flame retardants. |
| • |
The Potash segment is advancing research regarding environmental
protection, including by developing methods to treat and reduce effluents. |
| • |
The segment is engaged in analyzing alternative methods to increase
production capacity of carnallite at its evaporation ponds, based on renewable energies.
|
| • |
Other initiatives are centered on floatation and crystallization
plants aimed at enhancing production capacity while simultaneously reducing the consumption of industrial water. |
| • |
The segment conducted an analysis of adapting various potential
types of phosphate rock to produce phosphoric acid and its downstream products as part of an effort to utilize and increase existing phosphate
reserves. In 2025, the segment will further analyze additional types of phosphate including by conducting R&D, pilots, plant testing
activities and other economic feasibility assessments. |
| • |
Research was conducted regarding environmental protection, including
developing methods to treat and reduce effluents and applications for Phosphogypsum uses. |
| • |
The segment investigated opportunities to integrate waste steams
into our production processes, fostering a closed-loop circular economy and development of future sources for sustainable fertilizer products.
|
| • |
The segment engaged in developing a new fertilizer product with
microelements that contribute to plant growth. |
| • |
The segment developed a new PK fertilizer designed to be fully
water soluble. |
| • |
The Specialties R&D group established a team dedicated to
scaling up licensed technology for LFP CAM. In 2023, the Company was awarded a US Department of Energy grant for $197 million to establish
an LFP CAM plant at our St. Louis, US, facility, with payments commencing in 2024. As part of this grant, ICL will expand its R&D
activities to include next-generation products for the Battery Materials market. |
| • |
The segment introduced a novel asphalt admixture that improves
asphalt stiffening properties, similar to polyphosphoric acid, but which also significantly enhances antistrip properties with improved
freeze point and high flash point properties. |
| • |
The Specialties R&D group supported further growth in the
traditional markets and application areas of Meat/Poultry/Seafood, Dairy, and Bakery as evidenced by the establishment of three Centers
of Excellence, located in Germany and in the US. We also expanded our footprint in emerging markets through sustainable and affordable
solutions. New launches included innovative products beyond phosphates for clean label and texture improvement. |
| • |
The Front-End Innovation group has scouted over 700 food technology
start-ups globally to identify disruptive technologies for ICL Food Specialties. This rigorous process led to the successful identification
and establishment of a partnership with Japan's largest food tech start-up, DAIZ Engineering. Their patented germination technology significantly
reduces soybean off-flavors and enhances umami and fibrous structure, enabling the production of superior textured soy protein. After
having been proven successful in the Japanese market, this innovation will now be introduced to the EU market through our collaboration,
reinforcing ICL Food Specialties’ commitment to advancing cutting-edge solutions in plant-based meat and seafood alternatives.
|
| • |
The Company continued to diversify and develop its product portfolio
for meat substitutes: ICL Food Specialties and DAIZ Engineering partnered to launch ROVITARIS® SprouTx™, a revolutionary textured
soy protein developed with proprietary seed germination technology. This innovative solution effectively addresses key unmet needs in
taste, texture, and nutrition for plant-based meat and seafood alternatives. The launch at Food Ingredients Europe 2024 in Frankfurt received
widespread positive feedback from industry stakeholders and customers. Building on this strong reception, we anticipate commercializing
ROVITARIS® SprouTx™ in the European market in 2025. |
| • |
In the fourth quarter of 2024, we announced a follow-on investment
in Plantible Foods, an investment which builds upon ICL's initial participation and furthers the strategic collaboration between the two
companies. In October 2023, ICL Food Specialties, in collaboration with Plantible Foods, launched Rovitaris Binding Solution powered by
Rubi Protein. This innovative ingredient was honored with the Ingredient Idol award at the SupplySide West (SSW) conference in November
2024 and recognized as the most innovative food ingredient of the year. |
| • |
Development of controlled-release fertilizers with biodegradable
coatings to meet the regulatory requirements of the EU Fertilizer Product standards, which has been delayed from 2026 to 2028. |
| • |
Development of innovative bio-stimulant products, as well as bio-stimulants
embedded or mixed with ICL's fertilizers, designed to enhance their performance and improve the plant resistance to abiotic stresses.
|
| • |
Development internally and externally (e.g. Lavie-Bio, Agrematch,
Plantarcbio) of biological bio-stimulants designed to encourage plant growth and provide resilience to different stress conditions. In
2024, Lavie Bio Ltd. computationally identified over a dozen novel microbrial candidates, which were verified in multiple greenhouse trials.
The Company believes the microbes have commercial viability as a bio-stimulant for soybean and cotton crops grown under extreme weather
conditions, including drought. These microbes meet efficacy, stability, shelf life, and fertilizer compatibility product requirements.
|
| • |
Development of fertilizers designed to enhance nutrient-use efficiency
and reduce emissions. |
| • |
Development of liquid and fully soluble fertilizers. |
| • |
Development of products designed to improve water use efficiency.
|
| • |
Enhancement of micronutrients solutions and sulfur fertilizer
formulations. |
| • |
Integration of secondary source phosphate technologies for immediate
utilization at our production facilities in Europe as part of our Circular Economy approach and the advancement of future sources of our
fertilizer products, including the establishment of a technology roadmap for recycling and recovering phosphorous and nitrogen from secondary
sources to transition our products into sustainable fertilizers. |
| • |
Development of fertilizers with higher agronomic nutrient efficiency.
|
| • |
Development of customized formulations tailored to meet specific
customer requirements. |
| • |
As part of the division's expansion of its product portfolio and
deepening its relationship with farmers, in 2024 the Company launched a new bio-stimulants product line to augment its four existing product
lines. |
| • |
Various destinations around the world began to sell the bio-stimulants
product portfolio. Each destination is addressed by realizing the synergy of Brazilian products worldwide, local partnerships with suppliers,
and self-production in various destinations around the world. |
| • |
Recently, the segment launched a new brand of organic fertilizers
named Gronamic. The segment offers all product lines in an integrated program and maintains a dedicated and experienced team of unique
professional grass experts, along with a specialized distribution network that serve its key markets, mainly in Europe and Asia
|
| • |
Eqo®, eqo-x and eqo-s® - a group of brand names for
innovative fast biodegradable controlled-release fertilizers designed to meet new EU fertilizers standards due to take effect in 2026.
|
| • |
Keep Green® - a brand name for a novel biostimulant to protect
plants against excessive sun radiation and temperature. |
| • |
Sulfurgran® - a leading product and brand in the sulfur market
in Brazil. |
| • |
Profol® - a leading foliar nutrition product line and brand
in Brazil. |
| • |
Osmocote® - a leading brand in the area of controlled released
fertilizers which uses innovative technologies and is used globally by container nursery stocks, pot-plant growers and more. |
| • |
Peters® - a brand of water-soluble fertilizers, specifically
designed for bedding-, pot- and container nursery plants. |
| • |
Joha® - a global brand of dairy specialties, which specializes
in emulsifying salts for processed cheese. |
| • |
Tari® - a brand in the meat industry as well as in the artisan
business which focuses on the production and processing of meat products with functional additives, spices and flavors. |
| • |
Brifisol® - a global brand in the meat and seafood industries,
which concentrates in improving texture by adding cryoprotectant for frozen food products such as meat, shrimp, fish filets and more.
|
| • |
Rovitaris® - a brand name for plant-based meat alternatives
that are virtually indistinguishable from their traditional meat counterparts. |
| • |
Fyrol® - a brand name for a range of phosphorus-containing
flame retardants targeting flexible and rigid polyurethane foam applications. |
| • |
Merquel® - a line of inorganic brominated salts which can
be used to control mercury emissions from coal power plants. |
| A. |
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS |
|
Name |
Age |
Commencement date as director
|
Director Qualification |
Financial Expertise |
Membership in Board Committees
| ||
|
Under the Israeli Companies Law
|
Under the NYSE rules |
Under the Israeli Companies Law
|
Under the SEC rules |
||||
|
Yoav Doppelt (Executive Chairman of the Board) |
56 |
December 2018 and as CoB since July 2019 |
(1) |
- |
- |
-
| |
|
Aviad Kaufman |
54 |
March 2014 |
(1) |
Financial Expert |
- |
Financing Committee (member) | |
|
Avisar Paz |
68 |
April 2001 |
(1) |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
- |
Financing Committee (member)
|
|
Lior Reitblatt |
67 |
November 2017 |
Independent Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Audit & Accounting Committee (member)
Compensation Committee (member) |
|
Reem Aminoach |
63 |
March 2017 |
(2) |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
- |
-
|
|
Sagi Kabla |
48 |
February 2016 |
(1) |
Financial Expert |
- |
Financing Committee (Chair)
Climate, Sustainability & Community Committee (member)
| |
|
Tzipi Ozer Armon |
59 |
January 2020 |
Independent Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
- |
- |
|
Gadi Lesin |
57 |
March 2021 |
Independent Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Audit & Accounting Committee (member)
Climate, Sustainability & Community Committee (member)
|
|
Dr. Miriam Haran |
75 |
July 2021 |
External Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Audit & Accounting Committee (member)
Compensation Committee (Chair)
Climate, Sustainability & Community Committee (Cahir)
|
|
Dafna Gruber
|
59 |
January 2022 |
External Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Audit & Accounting Committee (Chair)
Compensation Committee (member)
Financing Committee (member) |
|
Michal Silverberg |
48 |
July 2022 |
(2) |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
- |
- |
|
Shalom Shlomo |
47 |
January 2024 |
Independent Director |
Independent Director |
- |
- |
Climate, Sustainability & Community Committee (member)
|
| (1) |
Messrs. Yoav Doppelt, Aviad Kaufman and Sagi Kabla are not considered
independent directors under the above rules by virtue of the positions they hold with our controlling shareholder or in the Company. On
July 18, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors determined that Mr. Avisar Paz qualifies as an independent director under the New
York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards. Mr. Paz
is not considered independent under Israeli law by virtue of the positions he previously held with our controlling shareholder.
|
| (2) |
Mr. Reem Aminoach and Ms. Michal Silverberg meet all qualifications
under the Companies Law for Independent Director but were not formally classified as ones. |
|
Name |
Age |
Position |
|
Raviv Zoller(1)
|
60 |
President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
Amir Meshulam(2)
|
48 |
Senior Vice President, Global Internal Auditor |
|
Anantha N. Desikan |
57 |
Executive Vice President, ICL Chief Innovation and Technology
Officer |
|
Aviram Lahav |
65 |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Elad Aharonson(1)
|
51 |
Executive Vice President, ICL Growing Solutions Division
|
|
Ilana Fahima |
59 |
Executive Vice President, Chief People Officer
|
|
Lilach Geva-Harel |
48 |
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Sustainability
Officer |
|
Meir Mergi |
62 |
President, ICL Potash Division |
|
Miri Mishor |
61 |
Executive Vice President, Global Information Technology
|
|
Noam Goldstein |
64 |
Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer |
|
Philip Brown |
55 |
President, ICL Phosphate Specialty Solutions Division
|
|
Yaniv Kabalek |
50 |
President, ICL Industrial Products Division |
|
Uri Perelman |
44 |
Executive Vice President, ICL Chief Business Development
Officer |
|
Maya Grinfeld |
49 |
Vice President, ICL Marketing and Communication |
| (1) |
As per ICL’s announcements on December 5, 2024, and December
23, 2024, Mr. Zoller will conclude his tenure as ICL’s President and Chief Executive Officer on March 12, 2025 and will be succeeded
by Mr. Elad Aharonson effective as of March 13, 2025. |
| (2) |
See C. Board Practices – Internal Auditor. |
|
Expert Directors |
Non-Expert Director |
|
|
Fixed Annual Fee |
~NIS 165,000 (approximately $44,600)
|
~NIS 124,000 (approximately $33,500)
|
|
Per Meeting Fee |
~NIS 6,400 (approximately $1,700) |
~NIS 4,800 (approximately $1,300) |
|
Non-executive Director |
Fixed Annual Fee |
Aggregate Per Meeting Fees
|
Total |
|
Aviad Kaufman |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 130,810 (~$35,354) |
NIS 295,851 (~$79,960) |
|
Avisar Paz |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 143,510 (~$38,786) |
NIS 308,551 (~$83,392) |
|
Dafna Gruber |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 213,360 (~$57,665) |
NIS 378,401 (~$102,271) |
|
Gadi Lesin |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 194,310 (~$52,516) |
NIS 359,351 (~$97,122) |
|
Lior Reitblatt |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 199,390 (~$53,889) |
NIS 364,431 (~$98,495) |
|
Michal Silverberg |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 109,220 (~$29,519) |
NIS 274,261 (~$74,125) |
|
Dr. Miriam Haran |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 217,170 (~$58,695) |
NIS 382,211 (~$103,301) |
|
Reem Aminoach |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 91,440 (~$24,714) |
NIS 256,481 (~$69,320) |
|
Sagi Kabla* |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 166,370 (~$44,965) |
NIS 331,411 (~$89,571) |
|
Tzipi Ozer-Armon |
NIS 165,041 (~$44,606) |
NIS 101,600 (~$27,459) |
NIS 266,641 (~$72,065) |
|
Shalom Shlomo |
NIS 123,730 (~$33,441) |
NIS 77,112 (~$20,841) |
NIS 200,842 (~$54,282) |
| (1) |
Annual cost of employment:
Annual fixed cost of employment of NIS 1.8 million (approximately $486,000). |
| (2) |
Short-term incentive
(“STI”): An annual cash bonus, in accordance with the Executive Chairman’s STI formula set forth in the Company’s
Compensation Policy. Mr. Doppelt’s target STI, which was his potential maximum STI payout in any given year, could not exceed NIS
1.2 million (approximately $329,000). For details regarding Mr. Doppelt’s STI formula and for his 2024 STI payout, see below "Short-Term
Incentive - The Annual Bonus Component". |
| (3) |
Termination arrangement:
In the event of termination of Mr. Doppelt's term of office as Executive Chairman of the Board, Mr. Doppelt is entitled to a six-month
adjustment period and six-month advance notice period, during both of which he will continue to be entitled to all of his compensation
terms, including STI payouts and continued vesting of his existing long-term incentive (“LTI”) plans. |
| (4) |
Long-term incentive (“LTI”):
On March 30, 2022, Mr. Yoav Doppelt was awarded a three-year LTI award, for the years 2022-2024, in the form of options to purchase 1,055,100
Ordinary Shares, at an exercise price of NIS 35.7 ($9.7) per share (or exercisable on a cashless basis pursuant to a customary “net
exercise” formula), with a total value of NIS 9 million (approximately $2.4 million), or NIS 3 million (approximately $811,000)
per vesting annum. For details regarding the Company's equity compensation plans, see Note 19 to our Audited Financial Statements.
|
| (1) |
Annual Cost of employment:
NIS 1,963,000 (approximately $530,500), consistent with the amount approved in 2022, adjusted for inflation since then. |
| (2) |
Short term incentive:
Mr. Doppelt is eligible for an annual cash bonus based on the Executive Chairman’s STI formula set forth in the Company’s
Compensation Policy, with a target STI, which is also the maximum potential payout of NIS 1,309,300 (approximately $358,700) per year,
consistent with the terms approved by the shareholders in 2022, adjusted for inflation since then.
|
| (3) |
Termination Arrangement:
Remained unchanged from the previous terms, approved by the shareholders in 2022. |
| (4) |
Other Benefits:
Mr. Doppelt is entitled to additional cash and non-cash benefits similar to those payable to senior executives of the Company, including
but not limited to, pension and severance pay, life insurance (risk), annual vacation days (and redemption of accrued vacation days),
sick days quota, recuperation days and expenses reimbursement. All of Mr. Doppelt’s compensation components, including base salary
and STI, are subject to periodical adjustment in accordance with increases in the CPI, with the baseline being the January 2025 CPI, published
on February 15, 2025, subject to the maximum amounts for each compensation component as set forth in the Compensation Policy. |
|
Grant for Year |
Grant Date |
Type of Equity |
Dates of Governance Bodies' Approvals
|
Grant Value (NIS) |
Amount of Options |
Expiration Date |
|
2022-2024(1)
|
March 30, 2022 |
Options |
HR & Comp. Committee – 31.1.22 & 6.2.22
Board – 8.2.22
Shareholders (Annual GM) – 30.3.22 |
9 million (3 million per annum) |
1,055,100 |
March 30, 2027
|
|
2025-2027(2)
|
March 6, 2025 |
Options |
HR & Comp. Committee – 31.12.24 & 6.1.25
Board – 9.1.25
Shareholders (Annual GM) – 6.3.25 |
11.25 million (3.75 million per annum) |
1,973,684 |
March 6, 2030 |
|
Vesting Schedule | ||||||
|
The options will vest in three equal tranches, upon each
of the three anniversaries of the grant date. Options fully accelerate if Mr. Doppelt ceases to provide services within 12 months following
a change of control (as defined in the Equity Plan), except in the event of termination for cause. | ||||||
| (1) |
The equity award was granted pursuant to the Company’s
Equity Compensation Plan (2014), as amended in June 2016. |
| (2) |
The equity award was granted pursuant to the Company’s
Equity Compensation Plan (2024). |
|
Details of the Recipient |
Payments for services |
||||||
|
Name |
Position |
Scope of position |
Base Salary |
Compensation
(1) |
Bonus (STI)
(2) |
Equity based compensation (LTI)(3)
|
Total |
|
US$ thousand | |||||||
|
Raviv Zoller (4)
|
President & Chief Executive Officer |
100% |
850 |
1,818 |
1,118 |
787 |
3,723 |
|
Elad Aharonson (5)
|
President, Growing Solutions Division |
100% |
410 |
586 |
394 |
922 |
1,902 |
|
Aviram Lahav (6)
|
Chief Financial Officer |
100% |
401 |
574 |
378 |
904 |
1,856 |
|
Philip Brown (7)
|
President, ICL Phosphate Specialty Solutions Division
|
100% |
375 |
415 |
598 |
677 |
1,690 |
|
Lilach Geva-Harel (8)
|
EVP, Chief Legal and Sustainability Officer |
100% |
287 |
433 |
303 |
748 |
1,484 |
| (1) |
The salary items (compensation) column in the above table include
all of the following components: base salary, customary social benefits, customary social and related provisions, Company car and reimbursement
of telephone expenses. The compensation is in accordance with both the Previous Compensation Policy and the New Compensation Policy.
|
| (2) |
The annual bonuses (STI awards) to officer holders for 2024, including
the top-five earners in 2024, were approved by our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on January 20, 2025, and January
22, 2025, respectively. |
| (3) |
The expense for share-based payment compensation is calculated
according to IFRS and is recognized in the Company’s statement of income over the vesting period of each portion. The amounts reported
in this column represent the expense recorded in the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, with respect
to equity-based compensation granted to the senior officer. For details regarding the Company's equity compensation plans, see Note 19
to our Audited Financial Statements. |
|
Senior officer |
Employment terms | |||
|
(4) |
Raviv Zoller |
Mr. Zoller's compensation terms, as
of December 31, 2024, were as follows: | ||
| • | Base salary: | |||
| - | Annual base salary of ~NIS 3.2 million (approximately $880,000), or | |||
| - | Monthly base salary of ~NIS 266,000 (approximately $73,000). | |||
| - | In accordance with the Company's Compensation Policy, the CEO's perquisites for the reporting period totaled ~NIS 0.3 million (approximately $81,000). This amount includes provisions for a company car and related gross-ups, reimbursement of telephone expenses, communication allowances (as newspaper), and meal allowances, and does not include any social benefit-related compensation or customary social related provisions such as pension payments. | |||
| • | STI – Annual Bonus: Target STI of ~NIS 3.5 million (approximately $959,000), and maximum STI of ~NIS 4.56 million (approximately $1.25 million). For information regarding Mr. Zoller’s STI formula, performance and payout in 2024, see below “Short-Term Incentive - The Annual Bonus Component”. | |||
| • | LTI – Equity: Entitlement to an annual LTI (equity) value of NIS 5.5 million (approximately $1.5 million). The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for Mr. Zoller’s LTI in the Company’s 2024 Financial Statements. For details regarding Mr. Zoller's equity-based compensation grants, see Note 19 to our Audited Financial Statements; | |||
| • | Termination arrangements: | |||
| - | 12-months advance notice period in case of termination by the Company (not for cause) or 6-months advance notice in case of resignation; | |||
| - | Additional severance equal to the last base salary multiplied by the number of years that Mr. Zoller served as ICL’s President & CEO. | |||
| • | In accordance with Mr. Zoller’s Employment Agreement, all compensation items per Mr. Zoller’s Employment Agreement, are adjusted to the increase in the CPI. | |||
| • | All other cash and non-cash benefits payable to our senior executives pursuant to our policies in effect from time to time, including but not limited to, pension, education fund, disability insurance, Company car, gross up, as well as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders. | |||
|
(5) |
Elad Aharonson |
• | Monthly base salary: ~NIS 128,000 (approximately $35,000), as of December 31, 2024, adjusted to increase in the CPI. | |
| • | STI: Target STI of 75% of the annual base salary. For details regarding Mr. Aharonson’s STI performance and payout in 2024, see below “Short-Term Incentive Annual Bonus Component”. | |||
| • | LTI: The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for Mr. Aharonson’s LTI in the Company’s 2024 Financial Statements. | |||
| • | Termination arrangements: Advance notice period of 6 months. | |||
| • | All other benefits customary in the Company, such as regular provisions for pension and severance, education fund, disability insurance, Company car, gross up, as well as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders. | |||
|
Senior officer |
Employment terms | |||
|
(6) |
Aviram Lahav |
• | Monthly base salary: ~NIS 125,000 (approximately $34,000), as of December 31, 2024, adjusted to increase in the CPI. | |
| • |
2024
STI: Target STI of 75% of the annual base salary. For details regarding Mr. Lahav’s STI performance and payout in 2024, see
below "Short-Term Incentive Annual Bonus Component". | |||
| • | LTI: The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for Mr. Lahav’s LTI in the Company’s 2024 Financial Statements. | |||
| • |
Termination
arrangements: 6-months advance notice period in case of termination by the Company (not for cause) or 3-months advance notice in
case of resignation. | |||
| • |
All other
benefits customary in the Company, such as regular provisions for pension and severance, education fund, disability insurance, Company
car, gross up, as well as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders.
| |||
|
(7) |
Philip Brown |
• | Monthly base salary: ~NIS 114,000 (approximately $31,000), as of December 31, 2024. | |
| • | STI: Target STI of 75% of the annual base salary. For details regarding Mr. Brown’s STI performance and payout in 2024, see below “Short-Term Incentive Annual Bonus Component”. | |||
| • | LTI: The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for Mr. Brown’s LTI in the Company’s 2024 Financial Statements. | |||
| • | All other benefits customary in the Company, such as regular provisions for health, retirement and severance, disability arrangement, car allowance, as well as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders. | |||
| (8) | Lilach Geva-Harel | •
|
Monthly base salary: ~NIS 98,000 (approximately $27,000), as of December 31, 2024, adjusted to increase in the CPI. | |
| • | STI: Target STI of 75% of the annual base salary. For details regarding Mrs. Geva Harel’s STI performance and payout in 2024, see below “Short-Term Incentive Annual Bonus Component”. | |||
| • | LTI: The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for Mrs. Geva Harel’s LTI in the Company’s 2024 Financial Statements. | |||
| • |
Termination
arrangements: Advance notice period of 6 months. | |||
| • | All other benefits customary in the Company, such as regular provisions for pension and severance, education fund, disability insurance, Company car, gross up, as well as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders. | |||
| • |
The target STI (“STI Target”) for the CEO represents
the payout amount for achieving a 100% performance level (i.e., meeting 100% of all targets) in a given year. The STI Target for the CEO
for any given fiscal year may shall not exceed 120% of the CEO’s annual base salary. |
| • |
80% of the CEO's STI Target will be measured against the performance
level of annual measurable financial and non-financial goals determined by the HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors
at the beginning of each fiscal year, as detailed in the Compensation Policy. |
| • |
Out of the 80% STI Target, at least 60% of the STI Target will
be based on financial goals included in the annual budget and the remaining 20% (or less) of the STI Target will be based on other measurable
non-financial goals. The achievement level of each goal, whether measurable financial goals or measurable non-financial goals, will be
assessed independently of other goals, according to the rating scale set forth in the Company’s Compensation Policy, and then translated
into payout factors. The measurable financial goals are calculated based on the figures from ICL's annual reports, as adjusted in accordance
with the pre-defined profit adjustments list in the Compensation Policy (the ”Predefined List”).
|
| • |
If the actual performance of ICL’s operating income and/or
net income, as adjusted according to the Predefined List, does not meet the threshold performance level (60% of budgeted level), there
will be no payout for the 80% portion of the STI award that is based on measurable financial and non-financial goals. |
| • |
The remaining 20% of the CEO's STI Target will be determined based
on a qualitative evaluation by the HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors. The maximum payout for this component cannot
exceed three base monthly salaries. |
| • |
The maximum STI payout for the CEO according to the Company's
Compensation Policy cannot exceed, for any given year, the lower of 130% of the CEO's STI Target for such year and $1.5 million.
|
| • |
Mr. Zoller’s STI Target for fiscal year 2024 after adjustment
to the CPI as per his employment agreement, was ~NIS 3.5 million (approximately $959,000), with a maximum STI payout of NIS 4.56 million
(approximately $1.2 million). |
| • |
For details regarding Mr. Zoller’s STI performance and payout
in 2024, see ”Five-highest earners STI performance and payout in 2024” below. |
| • |
The STI Target for the CoB represents the payout amount for achieving
a 100% performance level (i.e., 100% of all targets) in a given year. The STI Target for the CoB for any given fiscal year may not exceed
120% of the CoB's annual base salary. |
| • |
If the actual performance of ICL’s operating income and/or
net income, as adjusted according to the Predefined List, does not meet the threshold performance level (60% of the budgeted level), no
payout will be made under the CoB STI plan. |
| • |
Of the CoB's STI Targets for any given year, 30% will be based
on the performance level of ICL EBITDA; 30% on the performance level of ICL Operating Income; 20% on the performance level of ICL Net
Income, and 20% on the performance level of ICL’s Revenues. These goals will be derived from ICL’s budget for the relevant
fiscal year, and the achievement level of each goal will be assessed independently, according to the rating scale set forth in the Company's
Compensation Policy and then translated into payout factors. Such financial goals are calculated according to the figures from ICL's annual
reports, as adjusted in accordance with the Predefined List. |
| • |
According to the Compensation Policy, the maximum STI payout for
the CoB shall not exceed, for any given fiscal year, the lower of 150% of the CoB's STI Target and $1 million. |
| • |
Mr. Doppelt’s STI Target for 2024, which was also his potential
maximum STI payout, was NIS 1.2 million (approximately $329,000). |
| • |
Mr. Doppelt’s overall STI score for 2024 representing the
performance against the STI targets for 2024, was 139.5%. His payout was NIS 1.2 million (approximately $329,000), which represents a
100% score and is the maximum STI payment possible under Mr. Doppelt's compensation terms. |
| • |
Pursuant to the New Compensation Policy that was approved by our
shareholders on October 9, 2024, effective as of the STI for 2025, the CEO STI formula has been amended to provide that out of the measurable
80% STI Target, between 50%-100% will be measured against financial goals included in the annual budget for the relevant fiscal year,
and the remaining measurable STI Target will be measured against non-financial measurable goals. The list of financial and non-financial
measurable goals remains unchanged. In addition, the payout factor for non-financial measurable goals for excellent performance by the
CEO has been expanded to a range between 100%-125%. |
| • |
The list of financial goals’ adjustments for purposes of
calculating the STI of the CoB and the CEO for any given year in the New Compensation Policy includes an adjustment for force majeure
events, including pandemics, natural disasters, war (including related geopolitical developments), strikes and shutdowns, general emergency
situations, an offensive event against ICL or against its facilities (including cyber-attacks), etc., that were not considered for purposes
of determining the annual budget. According to shareholders approval, this adjustment applies as of 2024 reporting year period for purposes
of calculating the payout of the STI awards for 2024 for the CoB and the CEO. |
| • |
With respect to our Executive Officers, other than our CEO and
CoB, the Company's Compensation Policy provides that the annual bonuses may be calculated by measurable financial metrics and/or measurable
non-financial metrics, as pre-determined by our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, and/or determined based on a qualitative
evaluation. The HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors may determine, in any given year, that the STI payout for such
Executive Officers will be granted, in whole or in part, according to a qualitative evaluation of non - measurable items, subject to the
maximum STI payout set forth in the Compensation Policy and described below. |
| • |
The maximum STI payout for such an Executive Officers, other than
the CEO and CoB, shall not exceed, for any given fiscal year, the lower of 225% of the Executive Officer’s STI Target for such year
and $1 million. |
| • |
For details regarding the STI performance and payout to the five
highest earning senior officers of ICL for 2024, see ‘Five-highest earners STI performance and payout in 2024' below. |
|
Executive Office |
Annual Base
(1) |
STI Target % |
STI Target |
Overall score of % target (3)
|
2024 STI Payout |
|
Raviv Zoller |
NIS 3.2 million (~$0.88 million) |
NA(4)
|
NIS 3.5 million (~$0.96 million) |
116.6% |
NIS 4.08 million (~$1.12 million) |
|
Elad Aharonson |
NIS 1.5 million (~$0.41 million) |
75% |
NIS 1.2 million (~$0.33 million) |
124.83% |
NIS 1.44 million (~$0.39 million) |
|
Aviram Lahav |
NIS 1.5 million (~$0.41 million) |
75% |
NIS 1.1 million (~$0.30 million) |
122.6% |
NIS 1.38 million (~$0.38 million) |
|
Philip Brown(5)
|
NIS 1.4 million (~$0.38 million) |
75% |
NIS 1.0 million (~$0.28 million) |
123.9% |
NIS 1.27 million (~$0.35 million) |
|
33.33% |
NIS 0.5 million (~$0.125 million)
|
200% |
NIS 0.90 million (~$0.25 million) | ||
|
Lilach Geva Harel |
NIS 1.2 million (~$0.33 million) |
75% |
NIS 0.9 million (~0.25 million) |
125.5% |
NIS 1.11 million (~$0.30 million) |
| (1) |
The Annual Base amounts are as of December 31, 2024. |
| (2) |
The adjustments to the Company’s annual net and operating
income, as specified in “Item 5 – Financial Results and Business Overview– A. Operating Results", for purposes of calculating
the STI threshold and the measurable financials goals for the CEO and the CoB, adhere to the Predefined List in the Company's Compensation
Policy. This includes adjustments for charges related to the security situation in Israel, which as determined by the shareholders, apply
to STI awards for the year ending December 31, 2024, for purposes of calculating the payout of the STI awards for 2024 of the CoB and
the CEO, in order to align the financial measures for purposes of calculating such 2024 STI payouts with the 2024 financial measures reported
by the Company. |
| (3) |
For all executive officers, this column represents the weighted
percentage score of the measurable financial and non-financial goals (including ESG targets) and qualitative evaluation, as applicable.
|
| (4) |
Mr. Zoller's STI Target was determined in Mr. Zoller's Employment
Agreement as a nominal amount, linked to the CPI. |
| (5) |
Mr. Brown STI payout in 2024 (as shown in the table above) includes
his annual STI payment of NIS 1.27 million (approximately $0.35 million), which represents an overall score of 123.9% of his STI targets,
as well as an additional STI for the pre-defined 2024 KPI's, in the amount of NIS 912,500 (approximately $0.25 million). |
| • |
Identifying and addressing flaws in the business management of
the Company. |
| • |
Review and approve interested party transactions; determine criteria
for classification and approval of interested party transactions. |
| • |
Establishing whistleblower procedures. |
| • |
Overseeing the Company’s internal audit system and the performance
of its internal auditor. |
| • |
Appointment, compensation, oversight and scope of work assessment
of the Company’s independent accounting firm. |
| • |
Monitoring ICL’s financial statements and the effectiveness
of its internal controls. |
| • |
Ensure the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements and adherence to corporate governance best practices. |
| • |
Overseeing ICL’s risk management, including monitoring the
activities to manage and mitigate the identified risks. |
| • |
Recommending to the Board of Directors a policy governing the
compensation of officers and directors based on specific criteria. |
| • |
Recommending to the Board of Directors, from time to time, updates
to such compensation policy. |
| • |
Reviewing the implementation of such compensation policy.
|
| • |
Deciding whether to approve transactions with respect to terms
of office and employment of officers and directors (which require approval by the compensation committee under the Companies Law).
|
| • |
Approving, under certain circumstances, an exemption from shareholder
approval of the compensation terms of a candidate for chief executive officer (who meets certain non-affiliation criteria, in accordance
with the provisions of the Companies Law). |
| • |
Overseeing the Company’s bonus and equity plans. |
| • |
Overseeing evaluation of top management and employees. |
| • |
Overseeing succession planning. |
| • |
Overseeing ICL’s climate, sustainability, safety, environment
and water management related risks and opportunities, targets, policies and programs. |
| • |
Overseeing ICL’s community outreach programs, public relations
and advocacy. |
| • |
Overseeing diversity and inclusion aspects in the Company.
|
| • |
Overseeing ICL’s financing and equity management and operations,
including loans, equity offerings, hedging, debt and other financing vehicles. |
|
Organ Name |
Number of Meetings in
Reported Year |
Average Attendance |
|
Board of Directors |
19 |
97% |
|
Audit & Accounting Committee |
10 |
100% |
|
Human Resources & Compensation Committee |
6 |
100% |
|
Climate, Sustainability & Community Relations Committee
|
5 |
100% |
|
Financing Committee |
2 |
100% |
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
|
Phosphate Solutions |
3,765
|
3,970 |
3,961 |
|
Growing Solutions |
3,612
|
3,630 |
3,792 |
|
Potash |
2,063
|
2,092 |
2,120 |
|
Industrial Products |
1,605
|
1,615 |
1,624 |
|
Global functions and headquarters |
1,304 |
1,243 |
1,236 |
|
Sub Total |
12,349 |
12,550 |
12,733 |
|
Temporary employees |
718 |
800 |
886 |
|
Total employees |
13,067 |
13,350 |
13,619 |
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
|
Israel |
4,507
|
4,548 |
4,534 |
|
China |
1,938
|
1,984 |
1,999 |
|
Brazil |
1,580
|
1,637 |
1,711 |
|
Spain |
879
|
918 |
940 |
|
USA |
853
|
820 |
830 |
|
UK |
693
|
705 |
715 |
|
Germany |
686
|
704 |
717 |
|
Netherlands |
557
|
580 |
612 |
|
France |
124
|
126 |
127 |
|
All other |
532 |
528 |
548 |
|
Sub Total |
12,349 |
12,550 |
12,733 |
|
Temporary employees |
718 |
800 |
886 |
|
Total employees |
13,067 |
13,350 |
13,619 |
| • |
Bloomberg’s Gender-Equality Index |
| • |
Overall ESG Score: 5.53, with a percentile ranking of 93.8.
|
| • |
Environmental Score: 5.22, with a percentile ranking of 91.2.
|
| • |
Social Score: 4.01, with a percentile ranking of 76.4. |
| • |
Governance Score: 7.83, with a percentile ranking of 97.8.
|
| • |
United Nations Global Compact |
| • |
Women’s Empowerment Principles (WEP) |
| • |
33% females in senior leadership (T100) by the end of 2030 (in
2024, the percentage was 27% versus 25% in 2023). |
| • |
45% females on ICL’s Board of Directors by 2028 (in 2024,
the percentage was 33,33% versus 36% in 2023). |


|
Shareholders |
Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Special State
Share | ||
|
Number |
% |
Number |
% | |
|
Israel Corporation Ltd. (2) |
567,018,587 |
43. 95%** |
- |
- |
|
State of Israel (3) |
- |
- |
1 |
100% |
|
The Phoenix Holdings Ltd. (4) |
99,513,244 |
7.71% |
- |
- |
|
Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings Ltd. (5)
|
78,641,356 |
6.10% |
- |
- |
|
Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd.
(6) |
70,590,979 |
5.47% |
- |
- |
|
Altshuler Shaham Ltd. (7) |
64,691,143 |
5.01% |
- |
- |
|
Yoav Doppelt (8) |
1,070,481 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Avisar Paz (9) |
25,389 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Aviad Kaufman |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Sagi Kabla |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Lior Reitblatt (10) |
62,092 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Reem Aminoach (11) |
62,092 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Tzipi Ozer Armon (12) |
24,331 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Gadi Lesin |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Miriam Haran (13) |
53,289 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Dafna Gruber |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Michal Silverberg |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Shalom Shlomo |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Raviv Zoller (14) |
1,941,383 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Aviram Lahav (15) |
1,181,538 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Lilach Geva Harel (16) |
977,212 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Ilana Fahima (17) |
977,212 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Anantha Desikan (18) |
858,793 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Noam Goldstein (19) |
671,628 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Amir Meshulam (20) |
298,406 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Miri Mishor (21) |
671,628 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Elad Aharonson (22) |
1,417,216 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Meir Mergi (23) |
888,375 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Yaniv Kabalek (24) |
441,883 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Philip Brown (25) |
999,967 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Uri Perelman (26) |
379,997 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Maya Grinfeld |
- |
* |
- |
- |
| (1) |
The percentages shown are based on 1,290,442,231 ordinary shares
issued and outstanding as of March 6, 2025 (after excluding shares held by us or our subsidiaries). In accordance with SEC rules, beneficial
ownership includes voting or investment power with respect to securities and includes the shares issuable pursuant to options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 6, 2025. Shares issuable pursuant to options are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage
of the person holding such options but are not considered outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. |
| (2) |
Israel Corp. is a public company listed for trading on the Tel
Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE). Based on the information provided by Israel Corp., Millenium Investments Elad Ltd. (“Millenium”)
and Mr. Idan Ofer are considered as controlling shareholders jointly of Israel Corp., for purposes of the Israeli Securities Law (each
of Millenium and Mr. Idan Ofer hold shares in Israel Corp. directly, and Mr. Idan Ofer serves as a director of Millenium and has an indirect
interest in it as the beneficiary of the discretionary trust that has indirect control of Millenium, as stated below). As of December
31, 2024, Millenium holds approximately 38.29% of the issued share capital (and 38.66% of the voting rights) in Israel Corp., which holds
as of December 31, 2024, approximately 43.95% of the voting rights and approximately 43.13% of the issued share capital, of the Company.
|
| (3) |
For a description of the different voting rights held by the holder
of the Special State Share, see “Item 10 - Additional Information— B. Memorandum, Articles of Association and Special State
Share — The Special State Share.” |
| (4) |
Based solely upon and qualified in its entirety with reference
to a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Phoenix Holdings Ltd. (“Phoenix”), with the SEC on November 14, 2024. According to the Schedule
13G/A, the 99,513,244 Ordinary Shares reported therein are beneficially owned by various direct or indirect, majority or wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Phoenix (the “Phoenix Subsidiaries”). The Phoenix Subsidiaries manage their own funds and/or the funds
of others, including for holders of exchange-traded notes or various insurance policies, members of pension or provident funds, unit holders
of mutual funds, and portfolio management clients. Each of the Phoenix Subsidiaries operates under independent management and makes
its own independent voting and investment decisions. |
| (5) |
Based solely upon and qualified in its entirety with reference
to a Schedule 13G filed by Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings Ltd. (“Migdal”) with the SEC on February 13, 2025. According
to the Schedule 13G, of the 78,641,356 Ordinary Shares reported as beneficially owned by Migdal (i) 70,938,115 Ordinary Shares are held
for members of the public through, among others, provident funds, mutual funds, pension funds and insurance policies, which are managed
by direct and indirect subsidiaries of Migdal, each of which subsidiaries operates under independent management and makes independent
voting and investment decisions, (ii) 7,703,241 Ordinary Shares are held by companies for the management of funds for joint investments
in trusteeship, each of which operates under independent management and makes independent voting and investment decisions, and (iii) 0
are beneficially held for their own account (Nostro account). |
| (6) |
Based solely upon and qualified in its entirety with reference
to a Schedule 13G/A filed by Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd. (“Harel”), with the SEC on January
30, 2024. According to the Schedule 13G/A, of the 70,590,979 Ordinary Shares reported as beneficially owned by Harel (i) 67,917,056 Ordinary
Shares are held for members of the public through, among others, provident funds and/or mutual funds and/or pension funds and/or index-linked
securities and/or insurance policies, which are managed by subsidiaries of Harel, each of which subsidiaries operates under independent
management and makes independent voting and investment decisions, (ii) 1,962,970 Ordinary Shares are held by third-party client accounts
managed by a subsidiary of Harel as portfolio managers, which subsidiary operates under independent management and makes independent investment
decisions and has no voting power in the securities held in such client accounts, and (iii) 710,953 Ordinary Shares are beneficially held
for its own account. |
| (7) |
Based solely upon and qualified in its entirety with reference
to a Schedule 13G filed by Altshuler Shaham Ltd. (“Altshuler”), with the SEC on January 17, 2023. According to the Schedule
13G, of the 64,691,143 Ordinary Shares reported as beneficially owned by Altshuler (i) 61,312,442 Ordinary Shares are held by provident
and pension funds managed by Altshuler Shaham Provident & Pension Funds Ltd., a majority-owned subsidiary of Altshuler, (ii) 3,378,701
Ordinary Shares are held by mutual funds managed by Altshuler Shaham Mutual Funds Management Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Altshuler;
and (iii) 263,100 Ordinary Shares are held by hedge funds managed by Altshuler Shaham Owl, Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Altshuler-Shaham.
Mr. Gilad Altshuler may be deemed to possess shared investment authority with respect to all of the foregoing Ordinary Shares due to his
indirect 44.81% interest in Altshuler-Shaham, as well as his serving in various investment management capacities for Altshuler-Shaham
and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The foregoing provident and pension funds, mutual funds and hedge funds, are managed for the benefit
of public investors and not for the economic benefit of the foregoing reporting persons. Each of the foregoing reporting persons lack
authority with respect to the voting of all of such Ordinary Shares. |
| (8) |
Includes 15,381 ordinary shares and 1,055,100 ordinary shares
subject to options that are currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (9) |
Includes 25,389 ordinary shares. |
| (10) |
Includes 62,092 ordinary shares. |
| (11) |
Includes 62,092 ordinary shares. |
| (12) |
Includes 24,331 ordinary shares. |
| (13) |
Includes 53,289 ordinary shares. |
| (14) |
Includes 1,941,383 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (15) |
Includes 1,181,538 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (16) |
Includes 977,212 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (17) |
Includes 977,212 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (18) |
Includes 858,793 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (19) |
Includes 671,628 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (20) |
Includes 298,406 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (21) |
Includes 671,628 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (22) |
Includes 1,417,216 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (23) |
Includes 888,375 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (24) |
Includes 441,883 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (25) |
Includes 999,967 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (26) |
Includes 379,997 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently
exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| • |
The composition of our Board of Directors (other than external
directors, as described under “Item 6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees— C. Board Practices— External Directors”);
|
| • |
Mergers or other business combinations; |
| • |
Certain future issuances of ordinary shares or other securities;
and |
| • |
Amendments to our Articles of Association, excluding provisions
of the Articles of Association that were determined by the Special State Share. |
|
For the year ended December 31
| |||
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions |
$ millions | |
|
Sales |
-
|
1 |
7 |
|
Cost of sales |
1
|
1 |
13 |
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses |
9
|
6 |
15 |
|
Financing income, net |
(2)
|
(1) |
- |
|
General and administrative expenses |
1
|
1 |
1 |
|
Management fees to the parent company |
-
|
- |
1 |
|
As of December 31 |
||
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
$ millions |
$ millions | |
|
Other current assets |
41
|
19 |
|
Other current liabilities |
1
|
1 |
| A. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
| A. |
In May 2018, the Company was served with a motion for discovery
and pursual of documents (hereinafter – the Motion), filed with the Tel Aviv District Court, by a shareholder of the Company (hereinafter
– the Movant), as a preliminary proceeding in preparation for the possible filing of an application for certification of a multiple
derivative action against officers of the Company and ICL Rotem who, according to the Movant, caused the alleged damages incurred and
to be incurred by the Company as a result of the Ashalim incident. In 2018, the parties reached an arrangement, according to which, the
legal proceedings will be delayed until the relevant investigation's materials are provided to the Company by the investigating authority.
As of the date of the report, to the best of the Company's knowledge the criminal investigation is still pending. In accordance with the
Court's directive, the parties were required to update, from time to time, on developments concerning the settlement agreement, for the
purpose of determining the continuation of the proceedings in the claim. Considering the proceedings are in an early stage and even suspended,
it is difficult to estimate their outcome. |
| B. |
In July 2023, the Company was served with a motion for discovery
of documents, filed with the Tel Aviv District Court, by a shareholder of the Company (hereinafter – the Applicant), as a preliminary
proceeding in preparation for a possible filing of derivative action against officers of the Company who, according to the Applicant,
allegedly caused damages to the Company in the minimum amount of about $202 million plus linkage and interest, as a result of the decision
to purchase Allana Potash in Ethiopia. In January 2025, the parties submitted a joint request to dismiss the discovery request without
an order for costs. The court confirmed the agreement between the parties. |
| C. |
In October 2023, the Company was served with a motion for discovery
of documents, filed with the Tel Aviv District Court, by a shareholder of the Company (hereinafter – the Applicant), as a preliminary
proceeding in preparation for a possible filing of a derivative action against officers of the Company and/or ICL Rotem, who, according
to the Applicant, allegedly caused damages to the Company, as a result of ICL Rotem’s actions and/or omissions as detailed
in a class action which was filed against ICL Rotem in 2018, regarding pollution of the “Judea group – Zafit formation”
groundwater aquifer and the Ein Bokek spring with industrial wastewater. In October 2024, the Tel Aviv District Court ruled that the applicant
had failed to meet the burden of proof for even a preliminary evidentiary basis, and no evidence had been attached to demonstrate any
concrete violation on behalf of the officers. Therefore, the Court rejected the motion in its ruling and found the applicant liable for
legal expenses. For further information regarding the application for certification of a claim as a class action, see Note 18 to our Audited
Financial Statements. |
| ◾ |
To preserve the character of the Company and its subsidiaries,
ICL Dead Sea, ICL Rotem, Dead Sea Bromine Company, Bromine Compounds and Tami, as Israeli companies whose centers of business and management
are in Israel. In our estimation, this condition is met. |
| ◾ |
To monitor the control over minerals and natural resources, for
purposes of their efficient development and utilization, including maximum utilization in Israel of the results of investments, research
and development. |
| ◾ |
To prevent acquisition of a position of influence in the Company
or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries by hostile entities or entities likely to harm the foreign and security interests of the State of
Israel. |
| ◾ |
To prevent acquisition of a position of influence in the Company
or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries or management of such companies, whereby such acquisition or management may create a situation of
significant conflicts of interest likely to harm any of the vital interests enumerated above. |
| • |
certain financial institutions;
|
| • |
dealers or traders in securities that use a mark-to-market method
of tax accounting; |
| • |
persons holding ordinary shares as part of a “straddle”
or integrated transaction or persons entering into a constructive sale with respect to the ordinary shares;
|
| • |
persons whose functional currency for US federal income tax purposes
is not the US dollar; |
| • |
entities classified as partnerships for US federal income tax
purposes; |
| • |
tax exempt entities, “individual retirement accounts”
or “Roth IRAs": |
| • |
persons who acquired our ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise
of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation; |
| • |
persons that own or are deemed to own 10% or more of our stock
by vote or value; or |
| • |
persons holding our ordinary shares in connection with a trade
or business conducted outside of the US. |
| • |
a citizen or individual resident of the US;
|
| • |
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created
or organized in or under the laws of the US, any state therein or the District of Columbia; or |
| • |
an estate or trust the income of which is subject to US federal
income taxation regardless of its source. |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
USD/NIS |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of
5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
1.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Short term deposits and loans |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Trade receivables |
(3.3) |
(1.7) |
36.7 |
1.9 |
4.1 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.4) |
(0.2) |
4.0 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
1.3 |
0.7 |
(14.8) |
(0.8) |
(1.6) |
|
Trade payables |
37.1 |
19.4 |
(407.9) |
(21.5) |
(45.3) |
|
Other payables |
2.9 |
1.5 |
(31.9) |
(1.7) |
(3.5) |
|
Long-term loans |
10.6 |
5.6 |
(116.8) |
(6.1) |
(13.0) |
|
Fixed rate debentures |
14.7 |
7.7 |
(161.3) |
(8.5) |
(17.9) |
|
Forward |
(65.8) |
(34.0) |
(1.1) |
39.7 |
82.7 |
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting |
(31.0) |
(17.2) |
2.1 |
14.7 |
33.3 |
|
Swap |
(16.6) |
(8.7) |
(2.9) |
9.5 |
20.6 |
|
Total |
(50.7) |
(27.0) |
(691.4) |
27.5 |
60.1 |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
EUR/USD |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of 5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(1.8) |
(1.0) |
20.3 |
1.1 |
2.3 |
|
Short term deposits and loans |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Trade receivables |
(20.4) |
(10.7) |
224.4 |
11.8 |
24.9 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(1.6) |
(0.8) |
17.5 |
0.9 |
1.9 |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.4) |
(0.2) |
4.7 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
9.4 |
4.9 |
(103.9) |
(5.5) |
(11.5) |
|
Trade payables |
18.2 |
9.6 |
(200.6) |
(10.6) |
(22.3) |
|
Other payables |
4.7 |
2.5 |
(51.8) |
(2.7) |
(5.8) |
|
Long-term loans from banks |
27.3 |
14.3 |
(300.3) |
(15.8) |
(33.4) |
|
Long-term loans with variable interest rates |
46.7 |
24.5 |
(513.7) |
(27.0) |
(57.1) |
|
Options |
2.2 |
0.3 |
1.4 |
(2.9) |
(4.4) |
|
Forward |
18.2 |
8.6 |
2.0 |
(7.9) |
(15.1) |
|
Total |
102.4 |
52.0 |
(899.2) |
(58.4) |
(119.9) |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
GBP/USD |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of
5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(0.8) |
(0.4) |
9.3 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
|
Trade receivables |
(3.6) |
(1.9) |
39.1 |
2.1 |
4.3 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.2) |
(0.1) |
1.9 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
0.7 |
0.4 |
(7.9) |
(0.4) |
(0.9) |
|
Trade payables |
2.2 |
1.1 |
(24.0) |
(1.3) |
(2.7) |
|
Other payables |
0.5 |
0.3 |
(5.5) |
(0.3) |
(0.6) |
|
Long-term loans |
1.1 |
0.6 |
(11.9) |
(0.6) |
(1.3) |
|
Options |
(1.0) |
(0.5) |
(0.4) |
0.5 |
0.9 |
|
Forward |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Total |
(1.2) |
(0.6) |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
BRL/USD |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of
5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(6.3) |
(3.3) |
68.9 |
3.6 |
7.7 |
|
Trade receivables |
(27.0) |
(14.1) |
296.9 |
15.6 |
33.0 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.5) |
(0.2) |
5.2 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
Trade payables |
9.4 |
4.9 |
(103.3) |
(5.4) |
(11.5) |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.5) |
(0.2) |
5.2 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
Other payables |
1.1 |
0.6 |
(12.6) |
(0.7) |
(1.4) |
|
Long-term loans from banks |
1.7 |
0.9 |
(18.5) |
(1.0) |
(2.1) |
|
Forward |
1.6 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
(1.0) |
(2.0) |
|
Total |
(20.5) |
(10.5) |
242.1 |
11.7 |
24.9 |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
CNY/USD |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of
5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(13.7) |
(7.2) |
150.5 |
7.9 |
16.7 |
|
Short term investments and deposits |
(0.5) |
(0.3) |
5.8 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
Trade receivables |
(7.3) |
(3.8) |
80.6 |
4.2 |
9.0 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Trade payables |
5.5 |
2.9 |
(61.0) |
(3.2) |
(6.8) |
|
Other payables |
0.8 |
0.4 |
(8.6) |
(0.5) |
(1.0) |
|
Long-term loans (CNY) |
2.5 |
1.3 |
(27.6) |
(1.5) |
(3.1) |
|
Total |
(12.7) |
(6.7) |
139.7 |
7.2 |
15.4 |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
USD/NIS |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of
5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(0.2) |
(0.1) |
2.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Short term deposits and loans |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Trade receivables |
(6.0) |
(3.1) |
66.0 |
3.5 |
7.3 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(1.3) |
(0.7) |
14.0 |
0.7 |
1.6 |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
2.7 |
1.4 |
(29.8) |
(1.6) |
(3.3) |
|
Trade payables |
28.0 |
14.7 |
(308.5) |
(16.2) |
(34.3) |
|
Other payables |
2.4 |
1.3 |
(26.8) |
(1.4) |
(3.0) |
|
Long-term loans |
12.0 |
6.3 |
(132.1) |
(7.0) |
(14.7) |
|
Fixed rate debentures |
24.7 |
13.0 |
(272.0) |
(14.3) |
(30.2) |
|
Forward |
(64.2) |
(32.5) |
35.1 |
41.0 |
83.8 |
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting |
(27.8) |
(14.5) |
5.4 |
16.0 |
34.0 |
|
Swap |
(29.5) |
(15.5) |
(4.8) |
17.1 |
36.3 |
|
Total |
(59.3) |
(29.7) |
(650.3) |
37.9 |
77.8 |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
EUR/USD |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of
5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(0.9) |
(0.5) |
10.1 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
|
Short term deposits and loans |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
1.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Trade receivables |
(23.7) |
(12.4) |
260.5 |
13.7 |
28.9 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(2.0) |
(1.0) |
21.9 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.4) |
(0.2) |
4.5 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
11.1 |
5.8 |
(122.0) |
(6.4) |
(13.6) |
|
Trade payables |
20.4 |
10.7 |
(224.5) |
(11.8) |
(24.9) |
|
Other payables |
7.5 |
3.9 |
(82.4) |
(4.3) |
(9.2) |
|
Long-term loans from banks |
28.4 |
14.9 |
(312.0) |
(16.4) |
(34.7) |
|
Long-term loans with variable interest rates |
33.5 |
17.5 |
(368.1) |
(19.4) |
(40.9) |
|
Forward |
5.9 |
2.8 |
5.4 |
(2.5) |
(4.8) |
|
Total |
79.7 |
41.4 |
(805.1) |
(45.1) |
(95.0) |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
GBP/USD |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of 5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(1.3) |
(0.7) |
14.6 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
|
Trade receivables |
(5.3) |
(2.8) |
58.5 |
3.1 |
6.5 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
1.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
1.7 |
0.9 |
(18.9) |
(1.0) |
(2.1) |
|
Trade payables |
3.0 |
1.6 |
(33.4) |
(1.8) |
(3.7) |
|
Other payables |
0.2 |
0.1 |
(2.6) |
(0.1) |
(0.3) |
|
Long-term loans |
1.5 |
0.8 |
(16.8) |
(0.9) |
(1.9) |
|
Options |
(0.9) |
(0.4) |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
|
Forward |
(0.5) |
(0.2) |
(0.3) |
0.4 |
0.8 |
|
Total |
(1.7) |
(0.8) |
2.4 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
BRL/USD |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of
5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(5.9) |
(3.1) |
65.3 |
3.4 |
7.3 |
|
Trade receivables |
(32.3) |
(16.9) |
355.4 |
18.7 |
39.5 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Trade payables |
8.2 |
4.3 |
(90.7) |
(4.8) |
(10.1) |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.6) |
(0.3) |
7.0 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
|
Other payables |
1.3 |
0.7 |
(13.9) |
(0.7) |
(1.5) |
|
Long-term loans from banks |
2.3 |
1.2 |
(25.4) |
(1.3) |
(2.8) |
|
Forward |
1.3 |
0.7 |
(0.2) |
(0.7) |
(1.6) |
|
Total |
(25.8) |
(13.4) |
298.1 |
15.0 |
31.7 |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
CNY/USD |
Increase of
10% |
Increase of
5% |
Decrease of
5% |
Decrease of
10% | |
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(20.9) |
(10.9) |
229.9 |
12.1 |
25.5 |
|
Short term investments and deposits |
(0.4) |
(0.2) |
4.8 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
|
Trade receivables |
(7.1) |
(3.7) |
77.8 |
4.1 |
8.6 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Trade payables |
5.2 |
2.7 |
(56.9) |
(3.0) |
(6.3) |
|
Other payables |
1.0 |
0.5 |
(11.2) |
(0.6) |
(1.2) |
|
Long-term loans (CNY) |
2.9 |
1.5 |
(31.4) |
(1.7) |
(3.5) |
|
Total |
(19.4) |
(10.1) |
213.9 |
11.2 |
23.7 |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | |||
|
Increase of
1% |
Increase of
0.5% |
Decrease of
0.5% |
Decrease of
1% | ||
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Fixed-USD interest debentures |
55.4 |
28.5 |
(787.8) |
(30.2) |
(62.3) |
|
NIS/USD swap |
12.7 |
6.4 |
(2.9) |
(6.8) |
(14.0) |
|
Total |
68.1 |
34.9 |
(790.7) |
(37.0) |
(76.3) |
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
|||
|
Increase of
1% |
Increase of
0.5% |
Decrease of
0.5% |
Decrease of
1% | ||
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Fixed-USD interest debentures |
57.9 |
29.8 |
(1,099.8) |
(31.6) |
(65.2) |
|
NIS/USD swap |
15.1 |
7.8 |
(4.8) |
(8.2) |
(16.7) |
|
Total |
73.0 |
37.6 |
(1,104.6) |
(39.8) |
(81.9) |
|
Sensitivity to changes in the shekel interest rate
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | ||
|
Increase of
1% |
Increase of
0.5% |
Decrease of
0.5% |
Decrease of
1% | ||
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Fixed-interest long-term loan |
- |
- |
(116.8) |
- |
- |
|
Fixed rate debentures |
11.3 |
5.8 |
(161.3) |
(6.0) |
(12.4) |
|
NIS/USD swap |
(13.3) |
(6.8) |
(2.9) |
7.1 |
14.8 |
|
Total |
(2.0) |
(1.0) |
(281.0) |
1.1 |
2.4 |
|
Sensitivity to changes in the shekel interest rate
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | ||
|
Increase of
1% |
Increase of
0.5% |
Decrease of
0.5% |
Decrease of
1% | ||
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Fixed-interest long-term loan |
0.2 |
0.1 |
(132.1) |
(0.1) |
(0.2) |
|
Fixed rate debentures |
12.5 |
6.4 |
(272.0) |
(6.7) |
(13.8) |
|
NIS/USD swap |
(15.1) |
(7.8) |
(4.8) |
8.2 |
16.9 |
|
Total |
(2.4) |
(1.3) |
(408.9) |
1.4 |
2.9 |
|
Sensitivity to changes in the Euro interest rate
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | ||
|
Increase of
1% |
Increase of
0.5% |
Decrease of
0.5% |
Decrease of
1% | ||
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Long-term loans from banks and others |
4.0 |
2.0 |
(271.3) |
(2.0) |
(4.1) |
|
Sensitivity to changes in the Euro interest rate
|
Increase (decrease)
in fair value |
Fair value |
Increase (decrease)
in fair value | ||
|
Increase of
1% |
Increase of
0.5% |
Decrease of
0.5% |
Decrease of
1% | ||
|
Type of instrument |
$ millions | ||||
|
Long-term loans from banks and others |
6.5 |
3.3 |
(276.7) |
(3.3) |
(6.7) |
| • |
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
| • |
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and |
| • |
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. |
|
2024 |
2023 | |
|
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|
Audit fees(1)
|
4,356
|
4,321 |
|
Audit-related fees(2)
|
87
|
30 |
|
Tax fees(3)
|
1,651 |
1,262 |
|
Total |
6,094 |
5,613 |
| • |
Majority Independent Board. Under
Section 303A.01 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “LCM”), a US domestic listed company, other than a controlled
company, must have a majority of independent directors. |
| • |
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee. Under Section 303A.04 of the LCM, a US domestic listed company, other than a controlled company, must have
a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors. Our controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation,
has significant control over the appointment of our directors (other than external directors). |
| • |
Equity Compensation Plans.
Under Section 303A.08 of the LCM, shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity‑compensation plans and material
revisions thereto, with certain limited exemptions as described therein. We follow the requirements of the Companies Law, under which
approval of equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto is within the authority of our HR & Compensation Committee and
the Board of Directors. However, under the Companies Law, the award of any compensation to directors, the Chief Executive Officer or a
controlling shareholder or another person in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, including the award of equity-based
compensation, generally requires the approval of the compensation committee, the Board of Directors and the shareholders, in that order.
Under the Companies Law, the compensation of directors and officers is generally required to comply with a shareholder‑approved
compensation policy, which is required, among other things, to include a monetary cap on the value of equity compensation that may be
granted to any director or officer. |
| • |
Shareholder Approval of Securities
Issuances. Under Section 312.03 of the LCM, shareholder approval is a prerequisite to (a) issuing ordinary shares, or
securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares, to a related party, a subsidiary, affiliate or other closely related person
of a related party or any company or entity in which a related party has a substantial interest, if the number of ordinary shares to be
issued exceeds either 1% of the number of ordinary shares or 1% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance, and (b) issuing
ordinary shares, or securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares, if the ordinary share has, or will have upon issuance,
voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance or the number of ordinary shares to be issued
is equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of ordinary shares before the issuance, in each case subject to certain exceptions. We seek
shareholder approval for all corporate actions requiring such approval in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law, which
are different from the requirements for seeking shareholder approval under Section 312.03 of the LCM. Under the Companies Law, shareholder
approval is a prerequisite to any extraordinary transaction with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a
personal interest. Under the Companies Law, shareholder approval is also a prerequisite to a private placement of securities if it will
cause a person to become a controlling shareholder or in case all of the following conditions are met: |
| • |
The securities issued amount to 20% or more of the Company’s
outstanding voting rights before the issuance; |
| • |
Some or all of the consideration is other than cash or listed
securities or the transaction is not on market terms; and |
| • |
The transaction will increase the relative holdings of a 5% shareholder
or will cause any person to become, as a result of the issuance, a 5% shareholder. |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
ICL Group Ltd. | |||
By: | /s/ Aviram Lahav | ||
Name: | Aviram Lahav | ||
Title: | Chief Financial Officer | ||
ICL Group Ltd. | |||
By: | /s/ Aya Landman | ||
Name: | Aya Landman | ||
Title: | VP, Chief Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary | ||
F - 1

|
|
Somekh Chaikin
KPMG Millennium Tower
17 Ha'arba'a Street, PO Box 609
Tel Aviv 61006 Israel
|
Telephone
Fax
Internet
|
972 3 684 8000
972 3 684 8444
www.kpmg.co.il
|
F - 2
F - 3
F - 4
|
2024
|
2023
|
||
|
Note
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Current assets
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
6
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other receivables
|
7
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|||
|
Deferred tax assets
|
15
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
10
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
11
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
9,16
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|||
|
Short-term debt
|
13
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions
|
17
|
|
|
|
Other payables
|
14
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|||
|
Long-term debt and debentures
|
13
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
15
|
|
|
|
Long-term employee liabilities
|
16
|
|
|
|
Long-term provisions and accruals
|
17
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
19
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
||
|
Note
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Sales
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
20
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Finance expenses, net
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on income
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to the shareholders of the Company:
|
22
|
|||
|
Basic earnings per share (in dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (in dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding:
|
22
|
|||
|
Basic (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
Components of other comprehensive income that will be reclassified subsequently to net income
|
|||
|
Foreign currency translation differences
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to the statement of income
|
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of the change in fair value of cash flow hedges
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Tax relating to items that will be reclassified subsequently to net income
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
Components of other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to net income
|
|||
|
Actuarial gains from defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
Tax relating to items that will not be reclassified to net income
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to the non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
Non-
controlling interests
|
Total
equity
|
|||||||
|
Share
capital
|
Share
premium
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
Capital
reserves
|
Treasury
shares,
at cost
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|||
|
$ millions
|
|||||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2024
|
|||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
Non-
controlling interests
|
Total
equity
|
|||||||
|
Share
capital
|
Share
premium
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
Capital
reserves
|
Treasury
shares,
at cost
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|||
|
$ millions
|
|||||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2023
|
|||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2023
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
Non-
controlling interests
|
Total
equity
|
|||||||
|
Share
capital
|
Share
premium
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
Capital
reserves
|
Treasury
shares,
at cost
|
Retained
earnings |
Total
shareholders’ equity |
|||
|
$ millions
|
|||||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2022
|
|||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2022
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2022
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|||
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets impairment
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate, interest and derivative, net
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Change in provisions
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in inventories
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Change in trade receivables
|
|
|
(
|
|
Change in trade payables
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Change in other receivables
|
|
|
(
|
|
Change in other payables
|
|
(
|
|
|
Net change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refund
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities (*)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|||
|
Proceeds (payments) from deposits, net
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Proceeds from divestiture of assets and businesses, net of transaction expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received (*)
|
|
|
|
|
Business combinations
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|||
|
Dividends paid to the Company's shareholders
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Receipts of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Repayments of short-term debt
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Interest paid (*)
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Receipts (payments) from transactions in derivatives
|
(
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid to the non-controlling interests
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of the period
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the period
|
|
|
|
| A. |
The Reporting Entity
|
| B. |
Security situation in Israel
|
| C. |
Definitions
|
| 1. |
Subsidiary – a company over which the Company has control and the financial statements of which are fully consolidated with the Company's statements as part of the consolidated financial statements.
|
| 2. |
Investee company – a subsidiary, including a partnership or joint venture which is accounted for using the equity method.
|
| 3. |
Related party – As in IAS 24 (2009), “Related Party Disclosures”.
|
| A. |
Statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
|
| B. |
Functional and presentation currency
|
| C. |
Basis of measurement
|
| D. |
Operating cycle
|
| E. |
Use of estimates and judgment
|
| E. |
Use of estimates and judgment (cont'd)
|
|
Estimate
|
Principal assumptions
|
Possible effects
|
Reference
|
|
Concessions, permits and business licenses
|
Forecast of obtaining renewed concessions, permits and business licenses which constitute the basis for the Company's continued operations and the Company's expectations regarding the holding of the operating assets by it and / or by a subsidiary until the end of their useful lives
|
Impact on the value of the operation, depreciation periods and residual values of related assets.
|
See Note 3 – Material Accounting Policies and Note 18 -Concessions.
|
|
Recoverable amount of a cash generating unit, among other things, containing goodwill
|
Expected cash-flow forecasts including estimates of mineral reserves, discount rate, market risk and the forecasted growth rate.
|
Change in impairment valuation.
|
See Note 12 - Impairment Testing.
|
|
Probability assessment of contingent and environmental liabilities including cost of waste removal/ restoration
|
Whether it is more likely than not that an outflow of economic resources will be required in respect of potential liabilities under the environmental protection laws and legal claims pending against ICL and the estimation of their amounts. The waste removal/ restoration obligations depend on the reliability of the estimates of future removal costs and interpretation of regulations.
|
A change in the Company's estimated provisions for a claim and/or environmental liability, including waste removal and restoration.
|
See Note 18 - Contingent Liabilities.
|
| A. |
Basis for Consolidation
|
| 1. |
Subsidiaries
|
| 2. |
Non-controlling interests
|
| B. |
Foreign Currency
|
| C. |
Financial Instruments
|
| 1. |
Non-derivative financial assets
|
| 2. |
Non-derivative financial liabilities
|
| C. |
Financial Instruments (cont'd)
|
| 3. |
Derivative financial instruments
|
| 4. |
CPI-linked assets and liabilities not measured at fair value
|
| 5. |
Share capital
|
| D. |
Property, plant and equipment
|
| 1. |
Recognition and measurement
|
| D. |
Property, plant and equipment (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Subsequent Costs (after initial recognition)
|
| 3. |
Depreciation
|
|
In Years
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Technical equipment and machinery (1)
|
|
|
Dikes and evaporating ponds (2)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
| E. |
Intangible Assets
|
| 1. |
Goodwill
|
| E. |
Intangible Assets (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Research and development
|
| 3. |
Amortization
|
|
In Years
|
|
|
Concessions and mining rights – over the remaining duration of the rights granted
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
Technology / patents
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
Computer applications
|
|
| F. |
Inventories
|
| G. |
Impairment
|
| 1. |
Non-derivative financial assets
|
| 2. |
Non-financial assets
|
| 1. |
Defined contribution plans
|
| 2. |
Defined benefit plans
|
| 3. |
Early Retirement Payments
|
| 4. |
Short‑term benefits
|
| 5. |
Share-based compensation
|
| I. |
Provisions
|
| 1. |
Provision for environmental costs
|
| 2. |
Site restoration
|
| 3. |
Legal claims
|
| J. |
Revenue Recognition
|
| 1. |
Identifying a contract
|
| J. |
Revenue Recognition (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Identifying a contract (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Identifying performance obligations
|
| 3. |
Determining the transaction price
|
| 4. |
Satisfaction of performance obligation
|
| 5. |
Payment terms
|
| K. |
Government grants
|
| L. |
Leases
|
| M. |
Financing Income and Expenses
|
| N. |
Taxes on Income
|
| O. |
Amendments to standards and interpretations that have not yet been adopted (cont'd)
|
| A. |
Investments in equity securities
|
| B. |
Derivatives
|
| C. |
Liabilities in respect of debentures
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2024
|
|||||||
|
Sales to external parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Other expenses not allocated to the segments
|
(
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
|
||||||
|
Financing expenses, net
|
(
|
||||||
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees
|
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures as part of business combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2023
|
|||||||
|
Sales to external parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Other expenses not allocated to the segments
|
(
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
|
||||||
|
Financing expenses, net
|
(
|
||||||
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees
|
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2022
|
|||||||
|
Sales to external parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Other income not allocated to the segments
|
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
|
||||||
|
Financing expenses, net
|
(
|
||||||
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees
|
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
||||
|
$
millions
|
% of
sales
|
$
millions
|
% of
sales
|
$
millions
|
% of
sales
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C. |
Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2024
|
|||||||
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2023
|
|||||||
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
| C. |
Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2022
|
|||||||
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
| C. |
Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany sales
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
(
|
|
|
|
North America
|
(
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany eliminations
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
|
Spare parts
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
|
|
Of which:
|
||
|
Non-current inventories - mainly raw materials (presented as non-current assets)
|
|
|
|
Current inventories
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Government institutions
|
|
|
|
Current tax assets
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
Receivables from equity-accounted investees sale
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. |
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
(
|
(
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
(
|
(
|
|
Equity
|
(
|
(
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income before depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
In the beginning of 2024, the Company completed the acquisition of Nitro 1000, a manufacturer, developer and provider of biological crop inputs in Brazil, for a consideration of $
|
| (2) |
In July 2024, the Company completed the acquisition of Custom Ag Formulators (hereinafter - CAF), a North American provider of agriculture formulations and products customized for growers, for a total consideration of $
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Surplus in employees' defined benefit plans (1)
|
|
|
|
Non-current inventories
|
|
|
|
Receivables from equity-accounted investees sale
|
|
|
|
Long term deposits
|
|
|
|
Investments in equity-accounted investees
|
|
|
|
Derivative designated as a cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
See Note 16.
|
| A. |
Composition
|
|
Land and buildings
|
Technical equipment and machinery
|
Dikes and evaporating ponds (3)
|
Plants under construction (1)
|
Other
|
Right of use
asset (2)
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
Cost
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions in respect of business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions in respect of business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciated balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The additions are presented net of items whose construction has been completed and therefore have been reclassified to other categories in “property, plant and equipment”.
|
| (2) |
The total additions were recorded against lease liabilities under IFRS 16.
|
| (3) |
Depreciation expenses allocation in the amount of $
|
| A. |
Composition (cont'd)
|
|
Land and buildings
|
Technical equipment and machinery
|
Dikes and evaporating ponds (3)
|
Plants under construction (1)
|
Other
|
Right of use asset (2)
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
Cost
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciated balance as of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The additions are presented net of items for which construction has been completed and, accordingly, were reclassified to other categories in the “property, plant and equipment” section.
|
| (2) |
The total additions were recorded against lease liabilities (IFRS 16).
|
| (3) |
The Company conducted a useful life evaluation of Property, Plant and Equipment at its facilities in Israel. As a result,
|
| A. |
Composition
|
|
Goodwill
|
Concessions and mining rights
|
Trademarks
|
Technology / patents
|
Customer relationships
|
Computer
application
|
Others
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||||||
|
Cost
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions in respect of business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Balance as of December 31 ,2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. |
Composition (cont’d)
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
Concessions and mining rights
|
Trademarks
|
Technology / patents
|
Customer relationships
|
Computer
application
|
Others
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||||||
|
Cost
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
||||||||
|
Amortized Balance as of December 31 ,2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B. |
Total book value of intangible assets having defined useful lives and those having indefinite useful lives are as follows:
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Intangible assets having a defined useful life
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets having an indefinite useful life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
||
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
|
|
|
Industrial Products
|
|
|
|
Growing Solutions
|
|
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. |
Composition
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
||
|
From financial institutions
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of:
|
||
|
Debentures
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans from financial institutions
|
|
|
|
Lease Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-Term debt
|
|
|
|
Long- term debt and debentures
|
||
|
Long term lease liability
|
|
|
|
Loans from financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable debentures
|
|
|
|
Non-marketable debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less – current maturities of:
|
||
|
Debentures
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans from financial institutions
|
|
|
|
Lease liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long- term debt and debentures
|
|
|
| B. |
Yearly movement in Credit from Banks and Others (*)
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
|
|
Changes from financing cash flows
|
||
|
Receipt of long-term debts
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
(
|
(
|
|
Repayment of short-term credit
|
(
|
(
|
|
Interest paid
|
(
|
(
|
|
Receipt from transaction in derivatives, net
|
(
|
|
|
Total net financing cash flows
|
(
|
(
|
|
Initial recognition of lease liability
|
|
|
|
Interest expenses
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates
|
(
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
|
Other changes
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31
|
|
|
| C. |
Sale of receivables under securitization transaction
|
| D. |
Information on material loans and debentures outstanding as of December 31, 2024:
|
|
Instrument type
|
Loan date
|
Original principal (millions)
|
Currency
|
Carrying amount
($ millions)
|
Interest rate
|
Principal repayment date
|
Additional information
|
|
Debentures - Series F
|
May 2018, December 2020
|
|
US Dollar
|
|
|
|
(2), (3)
|
|
Debentures - Series G
|
January/May 2020
|
|
Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
(annual installment)
|
Partially repaid
(3), (4)
|
|
Debentures (private offering) – 3 series
|
January 2014
|
|
US Dollar
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Sustainability linked loan (SLL)
|
September 2021
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Loan - European Bank
|
September 2021
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
|
| D. |
Information on material loans and debentures outstanding as of December 31, 2024: (cont’d)
|
|
| (1) |
In January 2024, the Company repaid $
|
| (2) |
In June 2024, Fitch Ratings reaffirmed the Company’s long-term issuer default rating and senior unsecured rating at 'BBB-'. The outlook on the long-term issuer default rating is stable.
|
| (3) |
In July 2024, S&P credit rating reaffirmed the Company’s international credit rating and senior unsecured rating of 'BBB-'. In addition, the S&P Maalot credit rating agency reaffirmed the Company’s credit rating of 'ilAA' with a stable rating outlook.
|
| (4) |
In December 2024, the Company repaid NIS
|
| (5) |
The loan includes three sustainability performance targets: (1) an annual 4% to 5% reduction in direct and indirect Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2 emissions resulting from ICL global operations.(2) Through 2025, the Company is committed to adding a significant number of Tfs (Together for Sustainability) qualified vendors each year who meet criteria of management, environment, health and safety, labor and human rights, ethics, and governance and (3) for female to hold at least
|
| (6) |
As of December 31, 2024, the Company is in compliance with all its financial covenants set forth in its financing agreements. See item F below.
|
| E. |
Credit facilities:
|
|
Issuer
|
Group of international banks
|
|
Date of the credit facility
|
|
|
Date of credit facility termination
|
|
|
The amount of the credit facility
|
|
|
Credit facility has been utilized
|
|
|
Interest rate
|
Up to 33% use of credit: Euribor/ SOFR + 0.69%.
From 33% to 66% use of credit: Euribor/ SOFR + 0.89%
66% or more use of credit: Euribor/ SOFR + 1.04%
|
|
Loan currency type
|
|
|
Pledges and restrictions
|
|
|
Non-utilization fee
|
|
| (1) |
In April 2023, the Company entered into a Sustainability-Linked Revolving Credit Facility Agreement between ICL Finance B.V., as borrower, and a consortium of twelve international banks for $
|
| (2) |
In line with ICL’s strategic commitment to sustainability, the Sustainability-Linked RCF follows ICL’s initial Sustainability-Linked Term Loan dated September 2021. The Sustainability-Linked RCF includes three Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) which have been designed to align with ICL’s sustainability goals: a reduction in Absolute Scope 1 & 2 GHG Emissions; an increase in the percentage of female representation among senior ICL management; and an increase in the number of valid TfS (Together for Sustainability initiative) scorecards obtained for ICL Group suppliers. Each of these goals will be assessed regularly during the term of the Sustainability-Linked RCF through third-party verification of ICL’s performance in these areas.
|
| F. |
Restrictions on the Group relating to the receipt of credit
|
|
Financial Covenants (1)(2)
|
Financial Ratio Required under the Agreement
|
Financial Ratio December 31,
|
|
2024
|
|
Total shareholder's equity
|
Equity above $2,000 million
|
$
|
|
Ratio of EBITDA to the net interest expenses
|
Equal to or above 3.5
|
|
|
Ratio of the net financial debt to EBITDA
|
Less than 3.5
|
|
|
Ratio of certain subsidiaries loans to the total assets of the consolidated company
|
Less than 10%
|
|
| (1) |
The examination of compliance with the financial covenants is based on the Company's consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2024, the Company complies with all of its financial covenants.
|
| (2) |
The EBITDA calculation for the financial covenants, which amounted to $
|
| G. |
Pledges and Restrictions Placed in Respect of Liabilities
|
| (1) |
The Company has undertaken various obligations in respect of loans and credit lines from banks, including a negative pledge, whereby the Company committed, among other things, in favor of the lenders, to limit guarantees and indemnities to third parties (other than guarantees in respect of subsidiaries) up to an agreed amount of $
|
| (2) |
As of December 31, 2024, the total guarantees provided by the Company amounted to $
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
|
Current tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
Governmental (mainly in respect of royalties)
|
|
|
|
Income received in advance
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Including post-employment liabilities in the amount of $
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel
|
| 1. |
Income tax rate
|
| 2. |
Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (hereinafter – the Encouragement Law)
|
| a) |
Beneficiary Enterprises
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
|
|
| 2. |
Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (cont'd)
|
| a) |
Beneficiary Enterprise (cont'd)
|
| b) |
Preferred Enterprises
|
| 1) |
Preferred Enterprises located in Development Area A –
|
| 2) |
Preferred Enterprises located in the rest of the country –
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
|
|
| 2. |
Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (cont'd)
|
| 3. |
The Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxation), 1969
|
| a) |
Some of the Company’s Israeli subsidiaries are “Industrial Enterprise”, as defined in the abovementioned law. In respect of buildings, machinery and equipment owned and used by any "Industrial Enterprise", the Company is entitled to claim accelerated depreciation as provided by the Income Tax Regulations – Adjustments for Inflation (Depreciation Rates), 1986 which allow accelerated depreciation to any "Industrial Enterprise" as of the tax year in which each asset is first placed in service.
|
| b) |
The Industrial Enterprises owned by some of the Company's Israeli subsidiaries have a common line of production or similar industrial branch activity and, therefore, they file, together with the Company, a consolidated tax return in accordance with Section 23 of the Law for the Encouragement of Industry. Accordingly, each of the said companies is entitled to offset its tax losses against the taxable income of the other companies.
|
| 4. |
Taxation of Profits Natural Resources
|
| 4.1 |
Royalties
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
|
|
| 4. |
Taxation of Profits Natural Resources (cont'd)
|
| 4.2 |
Imposition of Surplus Profit Levy
|
| 1) |
Actual price in the sale transaction.
|
| 2) |
A price which will provide an operating profit for the bromine compounds manufacturer of
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
|
|
| 4. |
Taxation of Profits Natural Resources (cont'd)
|
| 4.2 |
Imposition of Surplus Profit Levy: (cont'd)
|
| 1) |
Actual price in the sale transaction.
|
| 2) |
A price which will keep an operating profit with the downstream products manufacturer of
|
| 3) |
The production and operating costs attributable to a unit of phosphate.
|
| 4.3 |
Corporate income Tax:
|
| B. |
Taxation of non-Israeli subsidiaries
|
|
Country
|
Tax rate
|
Note
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
(1)
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
(2)
|
| (1) |
The tax rate is an estimated average and includes federal and states tax. Different rate may apply in each specific year, as a result of different allocation of income between the different states.
|
| (2) |
The tax rate in the UK was increased from 19% to 25% since April 1, 2023.
|
| (3) |
In accordance with the legislation of BEPS Pillar 2 which entered into effect in 2024, there are several territories in which the Company operates, where the local tax rate may require a supplement to a minimum taxation of 15%. Based on the Company estimation, no material impact is expected on its results from the above legislation.
|
| C. |
Carried forward tax losses
|
| D. |
Tax assessment
|
| E. |
Deferred income taxes
|
|
In respect of financial position
|
In respect
of carry
forward
tax losses
|
Total
|
||||
|
Depreciable
property,
plant and
equipment
and
intangible
assets
|
Inventories
|
Provisions
for
employee
benefits
|
Other
|
|||
|
$ millions
|
||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2023
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Changes in 2023:
|
||||||
|
Amounts recorded in the statement of income
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Amounts recorded to a capital reserve
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2023
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Changes in 2024:
|
||||||
|
Amounts recorded in the statement of income
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recorded to a capital reserve
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Israeli Shekels
|
(
|
(
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
|
Brazilian Real
|
|
|
|
British Pound
|
|
|
|
U.S Dollar
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
| F. |
Taxes on income included in the income statements
|
| 1. |
Composition of income tax expenses (income)
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Current taxes
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
(
|
|
|
|
Taxes in respect of prior years
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. |
Theoretical tax
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income, as reported in the statements of income
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory tax rate (in Israel)
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretical tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
Add (less) – the tax effect of:
|
|||
|
Surplus Profit Levy tax
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced tax due to tax benefits
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Differences deriving from additional deduction and different tax rates applicable to foreign subsidiaries
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Tax on dividend
|
|
|
|
|
Deductible temporary differences and their reversal (including carryforward losses) for which deferred taxes assets were not recorded and non–deductible expenses
|
|
|
(
|
|
Taxes in respect of prior years*
|
|
(
|
|
|
Differences in measurement basis
|
|
|
(
|
|
Other differences
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on income included in the income statements
|
|
|
|
| G. |
Taxes on income relating to items recorded in equity
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Tax recorded in other comprehensive income
|
|||
|
Actuarial gains from defined benefit plan
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Change in fair value of hedging derivatives
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Taxes in respect of exchange rate differences on equity loan to a subsidiary included in translation adjustment
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total
|
|
(
|
(
|
| A. |
Composition
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
Termination benefits
|
(
|
(
|
|
Defined benefit obligation
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Equity instruments
|
||
|
With quoted market price
|
|
|
|
Without quoted market price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments
|
||
|
With quoted market price
|
|
|
|
Without quoted market price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with insurance companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B. |
Severance Pay
|
| 1. |
Israeli companies
|
| 2. |
Certain subsidiaries outside Israel
|
| C. |
Pension and Early Retirement
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
Some subsidiaries have signed plans with funds – and with a pension fund for some of the employees – under which such subsidiaries make current deposits with that fund which releases them from their liability for making pension payments under the labor agreements to their employees upon reaching a retirement age. The amounts funded are not reflected in the statements of financial position, since they are not under the control and management of the subsidiaries.
|
| D. |
Post-employment retirement benefits
|
| E. |
Movement in net defined benefit obligation and in its components:
|
|
Fair value of plan assets (*)
|
Defined benefit obligation
|
Defined benefit obligation, net
|
||||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2024
|
2023
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Income (costs) included in profit or loss:
|
||||||
|
Current service costs
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Interest income (expenses)
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Past service cost
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Effect of movements in exchange rates, net
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income:
|
||||||
|
Actuarial profits (losses) deriving from changes in financial assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other actuarial gains
|
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Change with respect to translation differences, net
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Other movements:
|
||||||
|
Benefits received (paid)
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
| F. |
Actuarial assumptions
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Discount rate as of December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Future salary increases
|
|
|
|
|
Future pension increase
|
|
|
|
| G. |
Sensitivity analysis
|
|
December 2024
|
||||
|
Decrease 10%
|
Decrease
5%
|
Increase
5%
|
Increase
10%
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
Significant actuarial assumptions
|
||||
|
Salary increases
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Mortality table
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
| H. |
The Effect of the plans on the Company's future cash flows
|
| I. |
Long-term incentive plan
|
| (1) |
At the general meeting of shareholders held on March 6, 2025, the shareholders approved a new three-year equity grant for the years 2025-2027 in the form of about
|
| (2) |
On April 3, 2024, and April 4, 2024, the Company’s HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved a new three-year equity grant for the years 2024-2026 in the form of about 12 million non-marketable and non-transferable options for no consideration to officers and senior managers. For further information, see Note 19.
|
| (3) |
In November 2021, Company's HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved a new Cash LTI plan, according to which, other senior managers will be awarded a cash incentive in 2025, the fair value at the grant date is about $
|
| A. |
Composition and changes in the provision
|
|
Site restoration and equipment dismantling (1)
|
Legal claims
|
Other
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions recorded during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions reversed during the year
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Payments during the year
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Main items under 'Site restoration and equipment dismantling':
|
| a. |
Spain – In 2018, a restoration plan was approved for the Suria and Sallent sites, which included a plan for handling the salt piles and dismantling of facilities. The restoration plan for the Suria site is scheduled to extend until 2095, and for the Sallent site up to 2072.
|
| b. |
ICL Rotem– as of December 31, 2024, according to the Company's estimation, the provision for the restoration of the mining sites and waste repositories, for ICL Rotem's operations, amounted to $
|
| c. |
Bromine Israel (Neot Hovav) – pursuant to the Ministry of Environmental Protection, the Company is required to treat both solid waste of past periods which is stored in a designated defined area on the site's premises, and currently-produced waste created during the ongoing production processes in the plant. Waste treatment is partly conducted through a hydro-bromine acid recovering facility (BRU), operated by the Company. Part of the waste is sent for external designated treatment. As of December 31, 2024, the provision for prior periods waste treatment amounted to $
|
| A. |
Commitments
|
| (1) |
Several of the Group’s subsidiaries have entered into agreements with suppliers for the purchase of raw materials and natural gas in the ordinary course of business for various periods ending in 2038. As of December 31, 2024, the total amount of the commitments is approximately $
|
| (2) |
Several of the Group’s subsidiaries have entered into agreements with suppliers for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment. As of December 31, 2024, the subsidiaries’ capital expenditures commitments total approximately $
|
| (3) |
As part of the collaboration between ICL's subsidiary in Spain (ICL Iberia) and the government of Catalonia to achieve environmental sustainability goals, the Company has undertaken to carry out restoration of salt piles at ICL Iberia’s sites, mainly by processing and removing them to the sea via a collector. In 2021, the Company signed an agreement with the Catalan Water Agency for the construction and operation of a collector. The key elements of the agreement include, among other things, guidelines by which the project will be managed, financing aspects related to the project, project costs and a determination of an operational maintenance mechanism, including usage costs. Based on the said agreement and Spain's water law, it was agreed that ICL Iberia will assume up to
|
| (4) |
In 2017, the Company entered into a gas purchase agreement with Energean Israel Limited (hereinafter - Energean), which holds a license to develop the Karish and Tanin gas reservoirs off the shore of Israel. Pursuant to the agreement, Energean will supply the Company with up to 13 BCM of natural gas (NG), valued at $
|
| (5) |
In 2020, the Company entered into a long-term lease agreement with a third party according to which ICL will lease an office building in Be'er Sheva, Israel, for a period of
|
| A. |
Commitments (cont'd)
|
|
| (6) |
The Articles of Association of the Company and its Israeli subsidiaries include provisions that permit exemption, indemnification and insurance of liability of officers and directors, all in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law.
|
| B. |
Concessions
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (2) |
ICL Rotem (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (2) |
ICL Rotem (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (2) |
ICL Rotem (cont'd)
|
| • |
Emission Permit - In January 2024, a new emission permit was issued to ICL Rotem under the Israeli Clean Air Act (hereinafter - the Law) valid until January 2031. The Company is in active discussions with Israel’s Ministry of Environmental Protection (MoEP) to assure adherence to all conditions outlined in the permit, including those specified in an administrative order under Section 45 of the Law, and to achieve satisfactory resolutions to notable timeline execution challenges for a limited number of projects.
|
| • |
Phosphogypsum storage - In 2021, a new Urban Building Plan was approved (the 2021 plan), the main objectives of which are to regulate areas for phosphogypsum storage reservoirs. Due to the ambiguity of the guidelines regarding the calculation of building permit fees, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the Tamar Regional Council in August 2023 which had no material impact on the Company's financial results.
|
| (3) |
ICL Iberia – a subsidiary in Spain
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (3) |
ICL Iberia – a subsidiary in Spain (cont'd)
|
| (4) |
United Kingdom
|
| A. |
ICL Boulby, ICL's subsidiary in the UK, holds onshore and offshore mineral leases and licenses, allowing for the extraction of diverse minerals, in addition to numerous easements and rights of way from private landowners. The offshore mineral field is leased from The Crown Estate on a production royalty basis and includes provisions to explore and exploit all targeted and known polyhalite and salt mineral resources of interest to ICL Boulby.
ICL Boulby has been actively engaged in negotiations with the private property owners and has recently secured the renewals of three existing lease agreements.
The renewal of eight of the remaining leases was referred to the High Court of Justice in London for a decision regarding the calculation mechanism. The Company estimates that the proceedings will be concluded by the end of 2025. These leases, along with two additional leases, which are still being negotiated, will continue to operate under the terms of the previous leases.
Historically, the renewal of leases has not been problematic. ICL Boulby believes that all land and mineral leases will be renewed, as required, and expects to have or obtain all government approvals and permits necessary for exploiting all targeted mineral resources.
In 2022, the North York Moor National Planning Authorities (hereinafter - NYMNPA) granted planning permission for Polyhalite and salt extraction until 2048. To comply, ICL Boulby was required to produce management plans for NYMNPA approval. As of the reporting date, all required plans are completed and approved.
With respect to the mining royalties, ICL Boulby pays royalties of
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (4) |
United Kingdom (cont'd)
|
| B. |
UK subsidiary within the Growing Solutions segment (hereinafter – Everris Limited) owns peat mines in the UK (Creca, Nutberry and Douglas Water). Peat is used as a component in the production of professional growing media. Extraction permits for Creca were granted until the end of 2051, and the site is currently operative. However, mining activity in Nutberry and Douglas Water ceased in 2024, following the expiration of their permits. Restoration at these sites has commenced.
|
| (5) |
YPH - China
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities
|
| (1) |
Ecology
|
| A. |
In June 2022, an unexpected flow of brine was discovered above ground at the outskirts of an alluvial fan area, which, according to initial assessment by the Company, appears to have resulted from a combination of seepage from the feeder canal of ICL Dead Sea’s pumping station P-9 (hereinafter P-9) and unique ground conditions, which, according to the Company's estimation, does not exceed the approved design specifications of P-9. The Company installed sealing sheets over an approximately 2km long section of the 15km feeder canal in the area of the fan, according to the instruction of Israel's Nature and Parks Authority.
|
| B. |
In 2017, the Israeli Water Law was amended, according to which saline water of the kind produced for Dead Sea plants by the Company's own water drilling is charged with water fees. In October 2021, as a response to the Company’s objection to the charges relating to water drilling within the concession area, the Water Authority informed the Company that water fees will not be charged for water production within the concession area. This decision was based on the opinion of the Ministry of Justice, according to which the royalties arrangement established in the Dead Sea Concession Law, 5771-1961, is the sole arrangement for collecting payment for the right to extract water in the concession area, and, therefore, it is not legally possible to impose additional charges for water fees in addition to the royalties (hereinafter – the Opinion). In September 2022, the Company was presented with two petitions filed in Israel’s Supreme Court, one by Adam Teva V’Din, and the second by Lobby 99 Ltd., against the Water Authority, Israel’s Attorney General, the Ministry of Justice, Mekorot Water Company Ltd. and the Company.
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| C. |
In 2021, a decision was rendered by the Israel Water Authority, despite the Company's objection, that the Company's status should be changed to a "Consumer-Producer", as defined in the Water Law, commencing with the Water Authority's production license, issued to the Company for 2021. In December 2023, after the Company’s appeal was rejected by the Water Court, the Company appealed against this decision to the Supreme Court. Following the Israel Water Authority's response to the appeal, a hearing was set for March 2025. The Company has made sufficient provision in its financial statements.
|
| D. |
In 2020, an application for a class action was filed in the Beer Sheva District Court in Israel against the Company, the Company's subsidiary, ICL Rotem, and certain of the Company's present and past officeholders, by a number of local residents in the Arava region in the south of Israel (hereinafter – the Applicants). The Applicants claim that discharge, leakage and seepage of wastewater from ICL's Zin site allegedly caused various environmental hazards to the Zin stream, which resulted in damage to various groups in Israel’s population, including: the Israeli public as the Zin stream property owners; those who avoided visiting Zin stream due to the environmental hazards; visitors of Zin stream who were exposed to the aforementioned hazards and the residents of the area near Zin stream who were affected by the hazards. Accordingly, the Applicants request several remedies, including restitution and compensation for the damage that they claim was caused to the various groups in a minimum amount of NIS
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| E. |
In July 2019, an application for approval of a claim as a class action was submitted to the Jerusalem District Court by an Israeli environmental association (hereafter - the Applicant) against 30 defendants, including Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company (hereinafter – the Respondents). The application includes claims relating to air pollution in Haifa Bay (located in northern Israel) and to alleged illness therefrom to the population of the said area.
|
| F. |
In 2018, an application for certification of a claim as a class action was filed with the Be’er Sheva District Court by two groups: the first class constituting the entire public of the State of Israel and the second-class constituting visitors to the Bokek stream and the Dead Sea (hereinafter – the Applicants), against the Company’s subsidiaries, ICL Rotem and Periclase Dead Sea Ltd. (hereinafter – the Respondents).
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| F. |
(Cont'd)
|
| G. |
In 2015, a request was filed for certification of a claim as a class action, in the Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court, against eleven defendants, including a subsidiary, Fertilizers and Chemical Ltd., in respect of claims relating to air pollution in Haifa Bay and for the harm allegedly caused by it to residents of the Haifa Bay area. The amount of the claim is about NIS
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| (2) |
Increase in the level of the evaporation pond in Sodom (hereinafter – Pond 5)
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| A. |
Composition:
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
|||
|
Authorized
|
Issued and paid
|
Authorized
|
Issued and paid
|
|
|
Number of ordinary shares of Israeli Shekel 1 par value (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Special State shares of Israeli Shekel 1 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Outstanding Shares (in millions)
|
|
As of January 1, 2023
|
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|
| B. |
Rights conferred by the shares
|
| (1) |
The ordinary shares grant their holders voting rights in General Meetings of the Company, the right to participate in shareholders’ meetings, the right to receive dividends and the right to a share in excess assets upon liquidation of ICL.
|
| (2) |
The Special State of Israel Share, is held by the State of Israel for the purpose of monitoring matters of vital interest to the State of Israel, grants special rights to make decisions, among other things, on the following matters:
|
| - |
Sale or transfer of company assets, which are “essential” to the State of Israel, not in the ordinary course of business.
|
| - |
Voluntary liquidation, change or reorganization of the organizational structure of ICL or merger (excluding mergers of entities controlled by ICL, directly or indirectly, that would not impair the rights or power of the Government, as holder of the Special State Share).
|
| - |
Any acquisition or holding of
|
| - |
The acquisition or holding of
|
| B. |
Rights conferred by the shares (cont'd)
|
|
| - |
Any percentage of holding of the Company’s shares, which grants its holder the right, ability or actual possibility to appoint, directly or indirectly, such number of the Company’s directors equal to half or more of the Company’s directors appointed.
|
| C. |
Share-based payments
|
| 1. |
Non-marketable options
|
|
Grant date
|
Employees entitled
|
Number of instruments (thousands)
|
Issuance's details
|
Instrument terms
|
Vesting conditions
|
Expiration date
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
Officers and senior employees
|
|
|
|
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
|
|
|
September 5, 2016
|
Former chairman of BOD
|
|
||||
|
February 14, 2017
|
Former CEO
|
|
|
|||
|
June 20, 2017
|
Officers and senior employees
|
|
|
|||
|
August 2, 2017
|
Former chairman of BOD
|
|
||||
|
March 6, 2018
|
Officers and senior employees
|
|
|
|||
|
May 14, 2018
|
CEO
|
|
|
|||
|
August 20, 2018
|
Former chairman of BOD
|
|
|
|||
|
April 15, 2019
|
Officers and senior manager
|
|
2 equal tranches:
(1) half at the end of 24 months after the grant date.
(2) half at the end of 36 months after the grant date.
|
|
||
|
June 27, 2019
|
CEO
|
|
||||
|
May 29, 2019 *
|
Chairman of BOD
|
|
||||
|
June 30, 2021
|
Senior employees
|
|
||||
|
February 8, 2022
|
Senior employees
|
|
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
|
|||
|
March 30, 2022
|
CEO
|
|
||||
|
March 30, 2022
|
Chairman of BOD
|
|
||||
|
February 14, 2023
|
Senior managers
|
|
||||
|
April 4, 2024
|
Officers and senior managers
|
|
| * |
The options were issued upon Mr. Doppelt's entry into office on July 1, 2019.
|
| C. |
Share-based payments (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Non-marketable options (cont'd)
|
|
|
2014 Plan
|
||||||||
|
Granted 2016
|
Granted 2017
|
Granted 2018
|
Granted 2019
|
Granted 2021
|
Granted 2022
|
Granted 2023
|
Granted 2024
|
|
|
Share price (in $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI-linked exercise price (in $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility:
|
||||||||
|
First tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of options (in years):
|
||||||||
|
First tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate:
|
||||||||
|
First tranche
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
Second tranche
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
Third tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
Fair value (in $ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per option (in $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C. |
Share-based payments (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Non-marketable options (cont'd)
|
|
|
Number of options (in millions)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2023
|
|
|
Movement in 2023:
|
|
|
Exercised during the year
|
(
|
|
Total options outstanding as of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
Movement in 2024:
|
|
|
Granted during the year
|
|
|
Exercised during the year
|
(
|
|
Total options outstanding as of December 31, 2024
|
|
| C. |
Share-based payments (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Non-marketable options (cont'd)
|
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
December 31, 2023
|
December 31, 2022
|
|
Granted in 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2021
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2024
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
December 31, 2023
|
December 31, 2022
|
|
Number of options exercisable (in Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average exercise price in Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average exercise price in US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
December 31, 2023
|
December 31, 2022
|
|
Range of exercise price in Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Range of exercise price in US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
December 31, 2023
|
December 31, 2022
|
|
Average remaining contractual life
|
|
|
|
| D. |
Dividends distributed to the Company's Shareholders
|
|
Date of dividend distribution by the Board of Directors
|
Actual date of dividend distribution
|
Gross dividend distributed
($ millions)
|
Dividend per share
(in $)
|
|
February 8, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
July 26, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2022
|
|
|
|
|
February 14, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
May 9, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
August 8, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
November 7, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2023
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
May 8, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
August 12, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2024
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2025*
|
|
|
|
| E. |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
| F. |
Capital reserves
|
| G. |
Treasury shares
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|||
|
Materials consumed
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of labor
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and fuel
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses
|
|||
|
Land and Marine transportation
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of labor
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|||
|
Cost of labor
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|||
|
Cost of labor
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Other income
|
|||
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance and energy tax refunds
|
|
|
|
|
Capital gain and profit from divestment
|
|
|
|
|
Employees benefits
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Other income recorded in the income statements
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|||
|
Provision for site closure, restoration costs and efficiency plan
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful debts
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instrument at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for legal claims
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses recorded in the income statements
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Financing income and expenses
|
|||
|
Financing income:
|
|||
|
Net gain from changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
Financing income in relation to employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from banks and others
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain from change in fair value of derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain from change in fair value of derivative designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing expenses:
|
|||
|
Net loss from change in fair value of derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from change in fair value of derivative designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expenses to banks and others
|
|
|
|
|
Financing expenses in relation to employees' benefits
|
|
|
|
|
Banks and finance institutions commissions (mainly commission on early repayment of loans)
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
Financing expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Net of borrowing costs capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing expenses recorded in the income statements
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Financial assets
|
Financial liabilities
|
|||
|
Measured at
fair value
through the
statement of
income
|
Measured at
amortized
cost
|
Measured at
fair value
through the
statement of
income
|
Measured at
amortized cost
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
Current assets
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
||||
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
||||
|
Short term debt
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Foreign currency derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
||||
|
Long term debt and debentures
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Other non- current liabilities
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total financial instruments, net
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
||||
|
Financial assets
|
Financial liabilities
|
|||
|
Measured at
fair value
through the
statement of
income
|
Measured at
amortized
cost
|
Measured at
fair value
through the
statement of
income
|
Measured at
amortized
cost
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
Current assets
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
||||
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
||||
|
Short term debt
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Foreign currency derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
||||
|
Long term debt and debentures
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Other non- current liabilities
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total financial instruments, net
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
Carrying amount ($ millions)
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
Short term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
Carrying amount ($ millions)
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|||
|
Gross
|
Impairment
|
Gross
|
Impairment
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Not past due
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Past due up to 3 months
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Past due 3 to 12 months
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Past due over 12 months
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
|
|
Additional allowance
|
|
|
|
Changes due to translation differences
|
(
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|||||
|
Carrying amount
|
12 months or less
|
1-2 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||
|
Non-derivative financial liabilities
|
|||||
|
Short term debt (not including current maturities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, debentures and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments
|
|||||
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
|||||
|
Carrying amount
|
12 months or less
|
1-2 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||
|
Non-derivative financial liabilities
|
|||||
|
Short term debt (not including current maturities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, debentures and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments
|
|||||
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Fixed rate instruments
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Variable rate instruments
|
||
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Impact on profit (loss)
|
||||
|
Decrease of 1% in interest
|
Decrease of 0.5% in interest
|
Increase of 0.5% in interest
|
Increase of 1% in interest
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
SWAP instruments
|
||||
|
Changes in Israeli Shekel interest
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Carrying amount
(fair value) |
Stated amount
|
Maturity date
|
Interest rate range
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
Years
|
%
|
|
|
Israeli Shekel
|
||||
|
SWAP contracts from fixed ILS interest to fixed USD interest
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
||||
|
Carrying amount
(fair value) |
Stated amount
|
Maturity date
|
Interest rate range
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
Years
|
%
|
|
|
Israeli Shekel
|
||||
|
SWAP contracts from fixed ILS interest to fixed USD interest
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
||
|
Impact on profit (loss)
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Non-derivative financial instruments
|
||
|
US Dollar/Euro
|
(
|
(
|
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/British Pound
|
(
|
|
|
US Dollar/Brazilian Real
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/Chinese Yuan
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Increase 10%
|
Increase 5%
|
Decrease 5%
|
Decrease 10%
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
US Dollar/Brazilian Real
|
||||
|
Forward transactions
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
||||
|
Forward transactions
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
SWAP
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/British Pound
|
||||
|
Options
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
Euro/ US Dollar
|
||||
|
Forward transactions
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Options
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|||
|
Carrying amount
|
Stated amount
|
Average
|
|
|
$ millions
|
exchange rate
|
||
|
Forward contracts
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
(
|
|
|
|
Euro/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/Brazilian Real
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound/Euro
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/Chinese Yuan Renminbi
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts hedge accounting
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Currency and interest SWAPs
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
(
|
|
|
|
Put options
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Call options
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
|||
|
Carrying amount
|
Stated amount
|
Average exchange rate
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||
|
Forward contracts
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/Brazilian Real
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/Chinese Yuan Renminbi
|
(
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts hedge accounting
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Currency and interest SWAPs
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
(
|
|
|
|
Put options
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Call options
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US Dollar/Japanese Yen
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound/US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
||||||||
|
US Dollar
|
Euro
|
British Pound
|
Israeli Shekel
|
Brazilian Real
|
Chinese Yuan Renminbi
|
Other
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-derivative instruments:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt, debentures and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Derivative instruments:
|
||||||||
|
Forward transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cylinder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SWAPS – US dollar into Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net exposure
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
||||||||
|
US Dollar
|
Euro
|
British Pound
|
Israeli Shekel
|
Brazilian Real
|
Chinese Yuan Renminbi
|
Others
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-derivative instruments:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt, debentures and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Derivative instruments:
|
||||||||
|
Forward transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cylinder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SWAPS – US dollar into Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net exposure
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
|||
|
Carrying
amount
|
Fair value
|
Carrying
amount
|
Fair value
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|||
|
Loans bearing fixed interest (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures bearing fixed interest
|
||||
|
Marketable (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-marketable (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The fair value of the Euro loans bearing fixed interest is based on calculation of the present value of the cash flows in respect of the principal and the interest and is discounted at the market interest rates on the measurement date for similar loans having similar characteristics and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The average discount interest as of December 31, 2024, for the Euro loans was
|
| (2) |
The fair value of the marketable debentures is based on the quoted stock exchange price and is classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
|
| (3) |
The fair value of the non-marketable debentures is based on present value calculation of the cash flows in respect of the principal and interest and is discounted at the market customary SOFR rate for similar loans with similar characteristics and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The average discount interest as of December 31, 2024, was
|
|
Level 2
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
As of December 31, 2023
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Derivatives designated as economic hedge, net
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedge, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Earnings attributed to the shareholders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
Shares thousands
|
Shares thousands
|
Shares thousands
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued during the year
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in computation of the basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
Shares thousands
|
Shares thousands
|
Shares thousands
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of the basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of stock options*
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of the diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
| A. |
Parent company and subsidiaries
|
| B. |
Benefits to key management personnel (including directors)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Short-term benefits
|
|
|
|
Post-employment benefits
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
|
Total *
|
|
|
|
* To interested parties employed by the Company
|
|
|
|
* To interested parties not employed by the Company
|
|
|
| (1) |
It is not an “extraordinary transaction” within the meaning thereof in the Companies Law.
|
| (2) |
The effect of each of the parameters listed below is less than one percent (hereinafter – the Negligibility Threshold).
|
| (3) |
The transaction is negligible also from a qualitative point of view. For the purpose of this criteria, it shall be examined whether there are special considerations justifying reporting of the transaction, even if it does not meet the quantitative criteria described above.
|
| (4) |
In examining the negligibility of a transaction expected to occur in the future, among other things, the probability of the transaction occurring will be examined.
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2024
|
2023
|
2022
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Financing income, net
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees to the parent company
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Until July 2022, the Company and its parent company, Israel Corp., were parties to a management services agreement, pursuant to which Israel Corp. provided to the Company board member services and ongoing general consulting services, such as professional, financial, strategic, legal and managerial advice, for an annual management fee of $
|
| (2) |
The Company’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies include a two-tier coverage for directors’ and officers’ liability, comprising of a joint primary tier with Israel Corp. and a separate tier covering the Company alone. Our directors and officers are beneficiaries of both tiers.
|
| (3) |
In December 2017, the Company, Oil Refineries Ltd. (hereinafter – "ORL", a public company controlled at that time by Israel Corp., our controlling shareholder) and OPC Energy Ltd. (a public company that is controlled indirectly by one of the Company’s controlling shareholders) signed individual agreements with Energean PLC for the supply of natural gas. Under the agreement between the Company and Energean, the Company will be entitled to acquire up to 13 BCM of natural gas over a period of 15 years, in the total amount of approximately $1.8 billion. As of December 31, 2023, ORL was no longer affiliated with our controlling shareholder. For further information, see Note 18.
|
| (4) |
In October 2020, the Company and ORL signed individual bridge supply agreements with Tamar Reservoir for the supply of natural gas, following a process of joint negotiations with the supplier and the approval of ICL's general meeting of shareholders. As of December 31, 2022, the bridge supply agreement with Tamar reservoir was no longer in effect. As of December 31, 2023, ORL was no longer affiliated with our controlling shareholder. For further information, see Note 18.
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities (*)
|
|
|
|
Ownership interest in its
subsidiary and investee companies
for the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
Name of company
|
Principal location of the
company’s activity
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICL Investment Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 1.00 per share
|
ICL
|
The New York Stock Exchange
|
| • |
any two directors of the company or one quarter of the serving members of the board of directors; or
|
| • |
To preserve the character of the Company and its subsidiaries Dead Sea Works Ltd., Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd., Dead Sea Bromine Ltd., Bromine Compounds Ltd. and Tami (I.M.I.)
Research & Development Institute Ltd. as Israeli companies whose centers of business and management are in Israel.
|
| • |
To monitor the control over minerals and natural resources, for purposes of their efficient development and utilization, including maximum implementation in Israel of the
results of investments, research and development.
|
| • |
To prevent the acquisition of a position of influence in the Company or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries by hostile entities or entities likely to harm the foreign and
security interests of the State of Israel.
|
| • |
To prevent the acquisition of a position of influence in the Company or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries or management of such companies, if such acquisition or
management may create a situation of material conflict of interest likely to harm one of the vital interests listed above.
|
| • |
an amendment to the company's articles of association;
|
| • |
an increase of the company's authorized share capital;
|
| • |
a merger; and
|
| • |
certain related party transactions requiring
shareholder approval under Israeli law.
|
| 2.1 |
The purpose of the Plan is to allocate to the CEO of the Company, directors, officeholders, service providers, and employees of the Company and of companies affiliated to
the Company (the “Offerees”) (in this Plan, the term the “Company” also refers to a party affiliated to the Company (as defined below), unless otherwise indicated
by the context), options for the purchase of ordinary shares of ILS 1.00 par value each (the “Shares” or “Company Shares”) of the Company (the “Option Warrants” or the “Options”) or Shares of restricted shares (as defined in Section 14 below) or restricted share units (as defined in Section 15 below) (all
together – the "Equity Grants"), according to this Plan as approved by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee and the Company Board of Directors (the “Board”)
and subject to the provisions of Sections 102, 3(I) and/or Sections 2(1)/2(2), (as relevant) of the Income Tax Ordinance (New Version), 5721-1961 (the “Income Tax Ordinance”) and the rules enacted by
virtue thereof, as amended from time to time (the “Rules”). Shares arising from the exercise of the Option Warrants or the exercise of restricted share units will be referred to in this Plan as the “Exercise Shares”.
|
| 2.2 |
The purpose of the Plan is to incentivize the Offerees to continue to contribute to the Company’s success in the future, success which is expected manifest, inter alia, in
the long-term business results, in the price of the Company’s Share in the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd. (the “Stock Exchange”), and thereby to further the best interest of the Company and to increase
its profits in the long-term.
|
| 3.1 |
The Offerees are employees, directors, officeholders, service providers or other officials in managerial positions of the Company or an affiliated party thereof, in Israel
and abroad, according to this Section 3.1.
|
| 3.2 |
In this respect, an “employee” is any person employed by the Company or an affiliated party of the Company
and a director, except for a controlling shareholder as defined in Section 32(9) of the Income Tax Ordinance; a “service provider” is any person who has engaged with the company or an
affiliated party thereof for providing services or consultation; an “affiliated party” is any person who is controlled directly or indirectly by the Company. The term control in relation to any person under this section will be interpreted as holding, directly or indirectly, the power
to direct the activity of that person, whether through voting rights or through a contract or in any other way. In relation to Equity Grants that are provided under Section 102, an affiliated party will not include an entity that is not
an “employing company” as defined in Section 102(A) of the Ordinance; a “person” refers to any individual, corporation, organization, enterprise, trust or unincorporated organization of another entity.
|
| 3.3 |
Unless the Board has established otherwise, Offerees who are Israeli employees will be granted Equity Grants in accordance with Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance,
whereas other offerees will be allocated Equity Grants according to the provisions of Section 3(I) and/or Sections 2(1) / 2(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, or according to the tax statutes of their country of residence, as relevant.
|
| 3.4 |
And it should be emphasized, in relation to Offerees who are officeholders as this term is defined in the Companies Law, the Equity Grants that will be allocated will also be subject, besides
the conditions of the Plan and the Companies Law, to the provisions of the Company’s compensation policy, if there is one, as modified and updated from time to time.
|
| 4.1 |
The Option Warrants will be allocated to the Offerees without consideration. Each Option Warrant will grant the right to receive from the Company by way of allocation one
ordinary share of the Company, of ILS 1.00 par value, in return for payment of the Exercise Price, as defined hereunder.
|
| 4.2 |
Unless otherwise stated by the Board, the exercise price for each share subject to an Option Warrant will not be less than the average closing price on the Exchange of the
share of the Company in the 30 days preceding the time of the Board’s resolution on the allocation and will be referred to hereinafter as the “Exercise Price”.
|
| 4.3 |
As long as the Board has not determined otherwise, the Exercise Price will be linked to the consumer price index, the base index being the index known on the date of the
Board’s approval (the “Base Index”), and the Exercise Price will increase or decrease in accordance with the ratio between the index known at the Exercise Time and the Base Index. It is clarified that
the Exercise Price for Offered who are not tax residents of Israel and/or who are subject to U.S. tax laws will not be linked to the consumer price index. In the case of occurrence of events specified in Sections 13.1-13.4 below, the required
adjustments will be made to the Exercise Price.
|
| 4.4 |
A share fraction created as a result of the aforesaid calculation will be rounded to the closest complete Share. Immediately after exercising, the entire quantity of
Options exercised will expire.
|
| 4.5 |
For the removal of doubt, it should be clarified that the Board is allowed, at its sole, full discretion, to exclude the effect of linking the Exercise Price to the
consumer price index and/or making the adjustments to the Exercise Price under Section 13 of the Plan in relation to allocations that will be made by it.
|
| 4.6 |
In the absence of any determination to the contrary by the Board, the manner of payment of the Exercise Price by the Offeree will be in such a manner that the Exercise
Price will not actually be paid to the Company, but will be taken into account at the time of calculation of the number of shares to which the Offeree is actually entitled from exercising the Options as set forth below (“Net Exercise”), as long as for Equity Grants according to Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance, the Net Exercise will be contingent upon prior approval from the Israel Tax Authority, if this approval is
required in order to maintain a tax benefit pursuant to Section 102;
|
| 4.7 |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the manner of payment of the Exercise Price may be done in any of the following ways, as determined by the Board at its sole discretion in
relation to each specific allocation: (A) cash; (B) check; (C) shares of the Company; (d) a combination of each of the foregoing; and/or (E) any other way that the Board decides on.
|
| 4.8 |
An Offeree will not be entitled to receive a fraction of a whole share, and the number of shares that the Offeree will be entitled to receive will be rounded to the closest
whole number of the Shares.
|
| 4.9 |
In the case of Share allocation according to this Section, the following terms will apply: the Company will transform into share capital a portion of its profits or of a
premium on shares or of any other source included in its equity according to its financial statements, up to the rate of the par value of the Exercise Shares, all as set forth in Section 304 of the Companies Law, 5759-1999 (the “Companies Law”).
|
| 4.10 |
If the allocation of the Exercise Shares upon net exercise will be subject to the Offeree paying to the Company the par value of the shares allocated in the exercise or the
minimum per share price according to the Exchange’s regulations (whichever the higher), the formula above will be adjusted as follows:
|
| 4.11 |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the manner of payment of the Exercise Price may be done in any of the following ways, as determined by the Board at its sole discretion in
relation to each specific allocation: (A) cash; (B) check; (C) shares of the Company; (D) a combination of each of the foregoing; and/or (E) any other way that the Board decides on.
|
| 4.12 |
“Fair value” for the purposes of Sections 4.6 and 4.10 above is the value of the Shares as of a certain date that will be determined
according to one of the following options:
|
| a. |
If the Shares were registered for trading (whether in Israel or in another exchange), the fair value of the Shares will be determined according to the closing price of the
share on the Exchange as of the day preceding the determination day (if the share is not traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd. the closing price will be a price published by a source that the Board has defined as a reliable source).
|
| b. |
In the case of inability to establish the market price according to Subsection A, the fair value of the Share will be determined in good faith by the Board or by an
external appraiser who will be appointed by the Board.
|
| 5. |
Depositing of the Options, the restricted share units and/or the restricted shares with a trustee
|
| 5.1 |
The Option Warrants, the restricted share units and/or the restricted shares will be allocated to the trustee in accordance with the capital gains track through a trustee
conditions as stated in Section 11.4 below (the “Trustee”), for the Offerees, after and subject to getting all the confirmations required by law.
|
| 5.2 |
Equity Grants to Offerees who are not tax residents of Israel, to service providers or controlling shareholders may be allocated directly to an Offeree or to a Trustee who
will be appointed by the Board, as the Board will decide at its sole, absolute discretion.
|
| 5.3 |
The time of allocation is the later of the day on which the Board approved the allocation of the Option Warrants, the restricted share units and/or the restricted shares,
to the Offeree (or a later time as determined by the Board) and the time of fulfillment of all of the suspending conditions for conducting the allocation (including approval by a shareholders meeting, to the extent required by law) (the “Allocation Time”).
|
| 6. |
The exercise right, restriction and manner of exercising the Option Warrants, the restricted share units and the restricted shares
|
| 6.1. |
The Eligibility of the Offeree to exercise an Equity Grant will form at the times prescribed in the granting letter subject to the continued employment or engagement (as
the case may be) of the Offeree at the company or an affiliated party of the Company (as the case may be) during the vesting period, as determined in the granting letter, and subject to additional conditions as prescribed in the granting
letter.
|
| 6.2. |
Unless otherwise stated by the Board, each of the Offerees will be allowed to exercise according to the conditions of the Plan (including as set forth in Section 9 below)
the Option Warrants, in part or in full, from the vesting time of each portion until 10 years after the Allocation Time (the “Exercise Deadline”). If the Exercise Deadline occurs on a day that is not a
business day at banks in Israel and a trading day on the Exchange, the Exercise Deadline will be deferred to the business day that is also the closest Exchange trading day after it.
|
| 6.3. |
An Offeree that will be interested in exercising the Option Warrants to which he is entitled into shares, according to all conditions of the Plan, will provide the Company
and the Trustee a written notice, signed thereby, in a form that will be prescribed by the Company (the “Exercise Notice”). The Exercise notice will include inter alia the identity of the Offeree and
the number of Option Warrants he is interested in exercising. The discretion on whether to exercise or not and when the duty of paying the Exercise Prices is of each individual Offeree and not that of the Trustee (except for a case in which
the exercising is through net exercising as set forth in Section 4 above and to the extent that the Offeree is not required to pay the par value of the shares allocated in the exercising or the minimum per share price according to the
regulations of the Exchange (whichever the higher) to the Company).
|
| 6.4. |
The Offeree will pay the Company the consideration that is due to the Company for the Exercise Shares that will be allocated to the Offeree in accordance with the Exercise
Notice in the manner that will be determined by the Company, unless it is net exercising, in which case the provisions of Section 4 as set forth will apply.
|
| 6.5. |
If the exercising of the Option or restricted share units into Shares constitutes a tax event, and if the Company informs the Offeree that there is a tax liability for the
exercising of the Options or restricted share units, the Company will be able to suspend the allocation of the Exercise Shares for these Equity Grants until the Offeree forwards to the Company, in addition, the full tax liability to the
Company’s full satisfaction.
|
| 6.6. |
On the first trading day after the day on which the company receives the Exercise Notice, filled in and signed by the Offeree and the Consideration being paid thereby as
set forth in Section 4.6 above (above and hereinafter: the “Exercise Time”), the Company will allocate the Exercise Shares to the Trustee1, and in the case of net exercising the provisions of
Section 4 will apply as set forth.
|
| 6.7. |
Option Warrants not exercised by the Exercise Deadline (as provided in Section 6.2 above) will expire, will not grant any right to compensation or indemnification and will
become invalid.
|
| 6.8. |
Exercise of the restricted share units into Exercise Shares will be executed as detailed in Section 15.2 below.
|
| 6.9. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is hereby clarified that according to the Exchange’ regulations, the exercise of Options or restricted share units into Shares will not be
executed on the effective date for the distribution of bonus shares, an offering by way of rights, distribution of dividend, equity consolidation, equity split or equity reduction (any one of the foregoing will be referred to in this Section
a “Company Event”), and such exercise will be deferred to the subsequent trading day. Additionally, in case the X day of a Company Event occurs prior to the effective date of a Company Event (as these
terms are defined in Exchange’s regulations), an exercise of Options or restricted share units into Shares will not be executed on such X day and the exercise will be deferred to the subsequent trading day.
|
| 7. |
Rights attendant to the Exercise Shares arising from the exercise of Option Warrants and restricted share units
|
| 7.1. |
The Exercise Shares will bear, immediately upon allocation thereof, equal rights for all intents and purposes, to the ordinary shares existing in the Company’s share
capital at the time of this Plan, and will grant, inter alia, the same rights to receive notices and participate in general meetings of the Company, to receive dividends or any other distribution and to receive surplus assets in case of
liquidation.
|
| 7.2. |
In any event where, according to the provisions of the Plan, an Offeree is entitled to be granted rights and/or bonus shares and/or any other right by virtue of the Option
Warrants and/or restricted share units and/or Exercise Shares (hereinafter: the “Rights”), and at the effective date for the distribution of such Rights the Option Warrants and/or restricted share units
and/or Exercise Shares are held by the Trustee, the Rights will be transferred unto the Trustee, who will withhold tax according to any law, inasmuch as applicable, and all such Rights will be allocated to the Trustee on behalf of the
Offerees and held by the Trustee until the lapse of the minimal trust period (as defined in Section 11.4 below) of the Options and/or restricted share units for which the Rights were allocated, and the terms of the tax track will apply to
such additional Rights.
|
| 7.3. |
In any case where the Company will distribute a cash dividend and, at the effective date for such dividend distribution, the Trustee held Exercise Shares on behalf of any
Offeree, the Company will transfer unto the Trustee dividend amounts for the Exercise Shares held by the Trustee as aforesaid for each Offeree, the Trustee will withhold tax by law, inasmuch as required, and thereafter transfer the dividend
amounts (after tax withholding) unto the Offeree. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7.1 above, as long as, according to the provisions of the Plan, Exercise Shares are held by the Trustee on behalf of the Offerees and have not been
transferred to the Offerees, such Shares will not grant any right to receive notices and to participate in general meetings of the Company.
|
| 8. |
Restrictions on execution of actions respecting the Option Warrants, restricted share units, restricted shares and Exercise Shares
|
| 8.1. |
The Option Warrants, restricted share units and restricted shares, as the case may be, constitute a personal right which cannot be transferred, assigned, encumbered,
whether voluntarily or otherwise (except to the inheritors of a deceased Offeree by way of a last will or inheritance laws, provided that they consent to the terms thereof). The Option Warrants and restricted share units will not be listed
for trade on the Exchange. The restricted shares and the Shares arising from exercise of the Option Warrants and restricted share units will be registered for trade on the Exchange.
|
| 8.2. |
The Option Warrants, restricted share units and restricted shares, as the case may be, granted to employees who are residents of Israel, will be allocated to the Trustee
according to Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance. Accordingly, the Option Warrants, restricted share units and restricted shares, or the Exercise Shares, as the case may be, will be held by the Trustee, according to the provisions of
Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance, for the duration of the minimal trust period, all as provided in Section 11 below.
|
| 8.3. |
The Trustee may not transfer the Option Warrants, restricted share units and restricted shares, granted according to this Plan to any third party, including an Offeree,
except in accordance with instructions received from the Company and subject to applicable law.
|
| 8.4. |
The transfer of rights to Option Warrants and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares and/or Exercise Shares according to a last will or according to inheritance
laws will be valid and bind the Company only after the Company has been delivered the following confirmation, signed and certified by a notary:
|
| a. |
A written request for transfer and a copy of a legal document creating and affirming the right of such person to act with respect to the estate of the Offeree and which
creates or affirms the right of the transferee;
|
| b. |
A written consent of the transferee to pay any amount respecting the Option Warrants, restricted share units and/or restricted shares in accordance with the Plan and
consent to pay any required amount pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, as well as consent to comply with all provisions of the Plan;
|
| c. |
Any other evidence required, in the view of the Board, in order to establish the right for the transfer of Option Warrants, restricted share units and/or restricted shares
and/or Exercise Shares, and the validity of such transfer.
|
| 9. |
Terms of the Plan in case of termination of employment relations or engagement relations
|
| 9.1. |
In case of termination of employment or engagement relations due to disability or death - the Offeree (or heirs thereof) will be entitled to exercise the matured Option
Warrants which have not been exercised into Shares during a period of twelve (12) months following the termination of employment or engagement relations, but in any case no later than the expiration time. The Board is allowed, subject to its
sole, absolute discretion, to expedite some or all parts of the Equity Grants that have not yet matured as of the time of termination of the employment or engagement relations owing to disability or death.
|
| 9.2. |
In case of termination of employment or engagement relations under circumstances which, in the Company’s view, grant it a legal right to terminate the employee without
paying severance compensation, including the perpetration of criminal offenses and breach of trust, all Option Warrants offered to the Offeree according to this Plan will immediately expire at the date of giving notice of termination,
including those that have matured and which have yet to be actually exercised.
|
| 9.3. |
At the allocation time, the Board is allowed to decide, at its sole, absolute discretion, that in case of termination of employment or engagement relations, provided that
the sum of years of the Offeree’s age and the period of employment with or provision of services to the Company equals or exceeds 75 years, all or only some of the Equity Grants allocated thereto which have yet to mature by
the said time of termination of employment or engagement relations, will become mature, and may be exercised into Shares within 12 months after such termination of employment relations or termination of the engagement.
|
| 9.4. |
Unless otherwise stated by the Board, in the case of termination of employment or engagement relations for any reason that is not described in Subsection 9.1 to 9.3 above,
the Offeree will be entitled to exercise only the Option Warrants that have matured through to the termination of his employment or the termination of his engagement that have yet to be exercised into Shares, and which have not yet expired,
and they will be exercisable over a period of 90 days from that day. The remaining Option Warrants will expire at the time of termination of his employment or engagement with the Company.
|
| 9.5. |
The Board is allowed, subject to its sole, absolute discretion, to take various steps towards any Equity Grant and to expedite some or all of the Equity Grants that have
not yet matured as of the time of termination of the employment or engagement relations.
|
| 9.6. |
The Offeree’s right to the Equity Grants granted to him under this Plan or to the exercise thereof will not end or expire or be expedited solely due to the fact that such
an Offeree has been transferred to work as an employee, as a service provider or as an officeholder of from the Company to an affiliated party thereof, or vice versa.
|
| 9.7. |
The Board may change the provisions of this Section 9 (and/or any one thereof) at its absolute discretion.
|
| 9.8. |
In this Section 9, the date of termination of employment relations is the end date of the employee-employer relations between the Offeree and the Company, or the ending of
the advance notice period (or adjustment period, if any), whichever the later.
|
| 9.9. |
With respect to a service provider – the time of termination of the engagement is the time of conclusion of the service provision agreement (in the case of the Offeree
providing services to the Company, including through a company under his control, by way of a service provision agreement), or the occurrence of a termination of engagement event as defined in the engagement agreement with the Offeree.
|
| 9.10. |
In case the engagement with the Company of an Offeree who served as director in the Company at the time of allocation is terminated, for any reason whatsoever, the
provisions of Sections 9.1-9.7 above will apply, mutatis mutandis. For purposes of Section 9.8 – the “date of employment relations termination” will be considered, in the case of directors - as the day
of termination of a director’s term of office, for whatever reason.
|
| 9.11. |
In the case of termination of employment or engagement relations of an Offeree in the Company who was granted restricted shares, the provisions of Section 14.7 below will
apply.
|
| 9.12. |
In the case of termination of employment or engagement relations of an Offeree in the Company who was granted restricted share units, the provisions of Section 15.4 below
will apply.
|
| 10. |
Sale event
|
| 10.1. |
Without derogating from the general power of the Board under the Plan, and subject to the approvals of the lawful competent organs, to the extent required, in relation to the case of a sale
event, the board will have the power at the time of allocation of the Equity Grants and/or around the time of occurrence of a sale event, to take the following steps in relation to some or all of the outstanding Equity Grants, without giving
advance notice and without getting the approval of the Offerees:
|
| a. |
Determine that the Equity Grants will be replaced or converted into equivalent Equity Grants of the successor company, or an affiliated company of the acquiring company, in a sale event, under
the conditions that the Board will prescribe or under the conditions that will be prescribed by the successor company.
|
| b. |
Determine that the Offerees will have a right to exercise the Equity Grants for the parts that have yet to mature and/or are not yet exercisable, under conditions that the Board will prescribe
(considering the original conditions of that Equity Grant) and that all parts of the Equity Grants that have not yet matured and/or have not been exercised immediately before the closing of the sale event will be cancelled.
|
| c. |
Determine that the vesting period will be expedited and that the additional exercising conditions, if any, will be considered as having been fulfilled (subject to closing of the sale event),
under conditions that the Board will prescribe (considering the original conditions of that Equity Grant) and that all parts of the Equity Grants that have not yet matured and/or have not been exercised immediately before the closing of the
sale event will be cancelled. For the removal of doubt, the foregoing does not derogate from the power of the board to establish in advance at the time of allocation of the Equity Grants, subject to the fulfillment of appropriate provisions
in the granting letter, that at the time of occurrence of a sale event, the Equity Grants that have not yet matured as of the time of closing the sale event will be expedited.
|
| d. |
Determine that the Equity Grants will be cancelled at the time of the sale event without any consideration or in exchange for cash or other consideration that is equal to: (i) the number of
shares covered by the Equity Grant, times (ii), the difference, if any between the fair value of the Company’s Share at the time of the sale event and the exercise price of the Equity Grant, subject to the condition that if the fair value of
the Share at the time of the sale event is not greater than the exercise price of the Equity Grant, the Board is allowed to cancel the Equity Grant without paying any consideration at all.
|
| e. |
Determine for any Equity Grant that has yet to mature and/or that cannot yet be exercised, that it will be cancelled without consideration, even if the fair value of the Company Share at the
time of the sale event is higher than the exercise price of that Equity Grant.
|
| 10.2. |
Any cash or other consideration that will be given for cancellation of an Equity Grant may be subject, at the discretion of the Board, to the following conditions: (i) maturation conditions
that are identical in nature to those that occurred for the Equity Grant that was cancelled immediately before the sale event; and/or (ii) other conditions, including conditional consideration arrangements and depositing in trust, to the
extent that these conditions apply to the consideration paid to the shareholders within the sale event.
|
| 10.3. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in any other case in the Plan, in the case of a sale event, the Board is allowed to decide, at its sole, absolute discretion, that at the time of completing the
sale event, the conditions of any Equity Grant will be changed, amended or cancelled, as the Board sees fit in good faith.
|
| 10.4. |
Notwithstanding the statements anywhere else in the Plan, the Board’s powers and ability to exercise its powers under this section, owing to them being an inherent characteristic of the rights
of the Offerees under the Plan, (i) will not be restricted in any form by adverse consequences (taxation or otherwise) that the Offerees may bear; and (ii) will not be considered as an adverse change or amendment of the rights of the
Conferees under the Plan, and any adverse consequence that the exercising of these rights may have will not be considered as an adverse change or amendment of the rights of the Offerees under the Plan, and these powers may be exercised
without the consent of the Offerees.
|
| 10.5. |
The Board is allowed to take various steps towards any Equity Grant, and take various steps in relations to different Equity Grant classes, or in relation to Equity Grants that are exercisable
and those that are not. Also, the Board is allowed to establish a different sum or type of consideration that will be distributed within the sale event to different offerees.
|
| 10.6. |
The decisions of the Board pursuant to Section 10.5 above will be final and will bind all Offerees.
|
| 10.7. |
If thus resolved by the Board, the Offerees will be subject to the final agreement within the sale event applying to the shareholders of the Company, including those conditions,
representations, undertakings, restrictions, waivers, indemnifications, participating in expenses and trust arrangements, as the Board will decide. Each Offeree will sign the documents he has been requested to sign by the Company, the
successor company or the acquirer within the sale event. Signing of these documents may be a condition to substitution of the Equity Grants, receiving consideration for the Equity Grants or exercising of the Equity Grants according to this
Section 10.
|
| 10.8. |
Liquidation. In the case of liquidation of the
Company, all of the outstanding Equity Grants of the Company will expire immediately prior to the liquidation being performed. The Board is allowed, at its sole, absolute discretion and subject to the approval of the competent organs of the
Company, to the extent required, to declare that a certain Equity Grant or all Equity Grants will expire on another date and grant each Offeree a right to exercise his Equity Grant, in part or in full, for the part of the Equity Grant for
which eligibility has not yet formed.
|
| 11. |
General tax consequences and provisions related to Equity Grants pursuant to Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance in the capital gains with trustee
track
|
| 11.1. |
Any tax liability for the allocation of the Options and/or the restricted share units and/or the restricted shares to the Offerees (including income tax, capital gains tax, national insurance
and health tax) and any other mandatory payment applying to granting of the Option Warrants and/or the restricted share units and/or the restricted shares, exercise thereof or sale of the Exercise Shares and/or the restricted share units
and/or the restricted shares and/or the released shares, will be borne by the Offerees. The Trustee, the Company or an affiliated party thereof, will be allowed to withhold any sum that must be withheld at source by law. The Company and/or
the Trustee will not allocate to the Offeree the Exercise Shares pursuant to the Equity Grants prior to payment of the entire tax liability of the Offeree.
|
| 11.2. |
The Offeree consents and undertakes to obey any taxation decision or other arrangement with the Tax Authority that will be approved by the Company.
|
| 11.3. |
The Company does not make any commitment to any particular taxation track applying to the Equity Grants. If a different tax track applies to the Equity Grants than that intended for them, the
tax consequences will be borne by the Offeree only. The Company and/or an affiliated party thereof will not bear any liability in relation to the manner in which the Equity Grant is treated for tax purposes, even if the grant is intended to
be subject to a certain form of treatment or tax scheme. This section will supersede any classification of the Equity Grant in the granting letter, in the resolutions of the Company or other documents, and no classification of a grant for tax
purposes that will be made in these documents will bind the Company.
|
| 11.4. |
The Option Warrants and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares allocated to Offerees in Israel will be subject to the provisions of Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance and all
Regulations enacted thereunder (jointly, above and below: “Section 102”). The Company has opted for the allocation to employees who are residents of Israel will be via a trustee, in the capital gains
track.
|
| 11.5. |
The provisions of Section 102 in relation to the capital gains track provide, inter alia, as of the time of this Plan, as follows:
|
| a. |
The Options and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares and the Shares received from the exercise of the Options and/or restricted share units will be held by a
trustee for a period of no less than two years after the Allocation Date;
|
| b. |
The income obtained by the employee from the allocation of the Options and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares will not be taxable at the time of allocation;
|
| c. |
The tax liability of the employee respecting the “benefit value portion” at the Allocation Date of the Options and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares will
be calculated according to the marginal tax rate applying to him. For this purpose, the “benefit value portion” will be calculated according to the average value of the Company’s Shares on the Exchange in the 30 trading days preceding the
Allocation Date of the Options and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares, after deduction of the cost of exercising the Options and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares, as the case may be;
|
| d. |
The remaining benefit value will be taxed at the rate applying to capital gains according to Section 102 (currently 25%);
|
| e. |
In the allocation of Options and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares as aforesaid, the company employing the Offeree may be allowed a payroll expense at the
amount of the employee’s income, to which tax will apply according to the marginal tax rate. With respect to the employee’s benefit value subject to the tax rate applying to capital gains according to Section 102 (currently 25%), the company
may not enter an expense for tax purposes. The aforesaid should not be viewed as taxation advice, and each Offeree should examine the taxation status applicable to thereto and decide whether and how to act according to their specific personal
circumstances.
|
| f. |
In the case of 102 grants through a trustee not fulfilling the conditions of Section 102 of allocation through a trustee in a capital gains track, these Equity Grants will
be classified as Equity Grants that are not through a trustee in accordance with the provisions of Section 102 or as Equity Grants in accordance with Section 3(I) of the Income Tax Ordinance, as relevant, and the tax consequences will be
borne by the Offeree.
|
| 11.6. |
Accordingly:
|
| a. |
No allocation will be made to employees until after the conditions required in the provisions of the capital gains track in Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance have
been fulfilled.
|
| b. |
Prior to the allocation of the Option Warrants and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares to the employees, the Company will engage with a trustee (the “Trustee”), who will hold the Option Warrants and/or restricted share units and/or restricted shares in trust on behalf of the employees until exercise of the Option Warrants and/or restricted share units
(or the expiration thereof, as the case may be), or until the lapse of the restriction of the restricted shares, as the case may be, and will also hold the Exercise Shares received by the exercise of the Option Warrants and/or restricted
share units and the restricted shares until the lapse of at least 24 months after the day of allocation to the Trustee (the “Minimum Trust Period”).
|
| 11.7. |
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this section, it is clarified that the transfer of Exercise Shares and/or restricted shares and/or released shares from the Trustee to an
Israeli employee or from an Israeli employees to any third party (including the sale thereof) will only be possible after the lapse of the Minimal Trust Period and payment of the applicable tax. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a transfer of
Exercise Shares and/or restricted shares and/or the released shares may be allowed even prior to the lapse of the Minimum Trust Period, after payment or withholding of tax inasmuch as required, and will be executed in accordance with the
provisions, terms and arrangements as agreed upon between the Company and the Trustee, subject to the provisions of Section 102 or the provisions of any law and to any agreement with tax authorities.
|
| 11.8. |
Notwithstanding all the provisions above and below, Offerees according to this Plan may also include Offerees whose place of residence and employment is outside Israel, and therefore the
provisions of Section 102 may not apply to them. If the Options and/or restricted share units and/or the restricted shares for these Offerees are deposited at the time of their allocation with the Trustee, the exercising of the Options and/or
restricted share units and/or the restricted shares will be through the Trustee in the manner prescribed in this Plan without the restrictions in Section 102 applying.
|
| 11.9. |
The contents of this Section 11 above do not presume to be an authorized interpretation of statutory provisions relating to the taxes which may apply in connection with the
granting of Options, restricted share units and restricted shares to the Offerees, and does not substitute legal and professional advice on the matter. Each of the Offerees (including Offerees as specified in Section 11.4 above) should
consider the various tax implications aspects and consequences and consult their professional advisors, including legal and taxation advice, taking into account their particular circumstances.
|
| 12. |
Additional provisions on the matter of Equity Grants pursuant to Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance that are not through a trustee and Equity
Grants pursuant to Section 3(I) of the Income Tax Ordinance
|
| 12.1. |
Equity Grants pursuant to Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance that are not through a trustee and Equity Grants pursuant to Section 3(I) of the Income Tax Ordinance may be allocated directly
to the Offeree or to the Trustee who will be appointed by the Board, as the Board will decide by its sole, absolute discretion. If the Board decides to allocate these Equity Grants to the Trustee to the benefit of the Offeree, the provisions
of the Plan will apply, mutatis mutandis.
|
| 12.2. |
In the case of the Offeree being allocated a grant pursuant to Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance other than through a trustee or an Equity Grant pursuant to Section 3(I) of the Income Tax
Ordinance, then at the time of termination of the employment and/or provision of services, the Offeree will deposit a bond to secure payment of the tax liability in relation to that Equity Grant, to the satisfaction of the Company.
|
| 13. |
Adjustments for distribution of bonus shares and/or allocation by way of rights and/or splitting and/or joinder of equity and/or distribution of dividends
|
| 13.1. |
Issue of bonus shares. If the company
distributes bonus shares after the allocation of Option Warrants or the restricted share units according to this Plan, then the number of Exercise Shares for exercising of the Option Warrants or restricted share units that have not yet been
exercised into shares and that have not yet expired through to the date of reference for the right to receive bonus shares will be increased, by adding the appropriate number, at no extra cost, of Shares to which the Offeree would have been
entitled as bonus shares had he exercised the Options or the restricted share units that had not yet been exercised into Shares through to the date of reference for the right to receive bonus shares, immediately before the time of reference
for the time of distribution of the bonus shares. It is clarified that the exercise price of the options or the restricted share units (if prescribed) will not change in the case of distribution of bonus shares, however, the payment for
each Share will be decreased accordingly pursuant to the increase in the number of Shares arising from any Option or restricted share unit.
|
| 13.2. |
Issue of rights. If the company offers its
shareholders securities of any type by way of issuing rights, the exercise right of the Option Warrants or restricted share units (if set) will not be adjusted, however, the number of Exercise Shares for exercising of the Option Warrants or
restricted share units that have not yet been exercised into shares on the date of reference for the right to acquire rights in an issue of rights will be adjusted according to the bonus component embodied in the rights that will be
calculated in accordance with the directions of the Exchange as they will be on the date of reference.
|
| 13.3. |
Changes in equity. In any case of splitting or
joinder of the share capital of the Company, or any corporate equity event of fundamentally similar character, the Company will make the changes or adjustments required for prevention of dilution or increasing of rights of an Offeree within
the Plan in relation to the number and class of Exercise Shares for the Options or restricted share units that have not yet been exercised by the Offeree and/or in relation to the exercise price of each Option or restricted share units (if
established).
|
| 13.4. |
Dividend distribution. As long as the Board has
not determined otherwise, if the Company distributes dividend in cash whose date of reference for distribution occurs after allocation of the Option Warrants pursuant to this Plan, then on the X day, the exercise price of Option Warrants
that have not yet been exercised and that have not yet expired as of that time will be reduced by the sum of the per share dividend (gross), according to its sum in ILS. For the removal of doubt, the exercise price will not be less than the
par value of the share in any case. It is clarified that the provisions of this Section 13.4 will not apply to Offerees who are not tax residents of Israel and/or who are subject to U.S. tax laws. Adjustments for distribution of dividends
made for restricted shares will be performed according to Section 14.5 below.
|
| 13.5. |
In any case of the adjustments set forth in this section resulting in the Company having to allocate fractional shares, the Company will not allocate such fractional shares, and the number of
Shares that will be allocated to the Offeree will be rounded to the closest whole number of shares.
|
| 13.6. |
It is clarified that the right of the Offeree to additional Exercise Shares as a result of adjustments according to the provisions of this Section 13 will only apply at the Exercise Time of the
Option Warrants or restricted share units.
|
| 14. |
Shares and restricted shares
|
| 14.1. |
Subject to the sole discretion of the Board, the Board will be allowed to grant, according to this Plan, Shares and/or restricted shares, as defined below, instead of or in addition to any
other grant of Options. The Shares and/or the restricted shares will be granted in exchange for a sum equal to the par value of the Company’s Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board is allowed to determine, at its sole discretion,
that the Offerees will not pay the par value of the Shares and/or the restricted shares upon their granting and that the Company will capitalize part of its profits into share capital or will act in any other way permitted by law in the case
of issue of shares in exchange for a sum lower than their par value, in accordance with the applicable law, including according to Section 304 of the Companies Law.
|
| 14.2. |
Restricted shares are shares that are subject to restrictions in transferability and that may not be transferred or sold until the end of their vesting period and removal of the restrictions
applying to them (the “Restricted Shares”). Upon the end of the vesting period of any Restricted Share and fulfillment of the additional conditions for its maturation, if applicable, the restriction
applying to that share will be released automatically and it will become an ordinary Share of the Company (the “Released Shares”).
|
| 14.3. |
The Board will be allowed to grant performance dependent Restricted Shares, according to the parameters as will be determined thereby.
|
| 14.4. |
The Exercise Shares will bear, immediately upon allocation thereof, equal rights for all intents and purposes, to the ordinary shares existing in the Company’s share capital at the time of this
Plan, and will grant, inter alia, the same rights to receive notices and participate in general meetings of the Company (subject to the statements in Section 14.6 below), to receive dividends (subject to the statements in Section 14.5 below)
or any other distribution and to receive surplus assets in case of liquidation.
|
| 14.5. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a dividend that has been distributed for Restricted Shares that have not yet matured will be held by the Trustee until the maturation date of the Restricted
Shares for which the dividend has been distributed and will be transferred thereafter to the Offeree, after withholding statutory tax at source by the Trustee. A dividend that has been distributed for Restricted Shares that have not yet
matured will be transferred directly to the Offeree, after withholding statutory tax at source by the Trustee.
|
| 14.6. |
Voting rights. As long as the Restricted Shares
have not matured according to the provisions of the Plan and the restrictions applying to them are not removed, the right of vote using them will be conferred to the Trustee only. The Trustee will not be required to exercise his voting
right. After the maturation of the Shares, the statements in Section 7 of this Plan above will apply.
|
| 14.7. |
Termination of employment or engagement relations
|
| 14.7.1. |
Unless otherwise resolved by the Board, at the time of termination of the employment or engagement relations, all of the Restricted Shares that were allocated to the Offeree pursuant to this
Plan and whose vesting period has not yet ended will be transferred to the Company without consideration. Also, the dividends distributed for Restricted Shares that have not yet matured as set forth and held by the Trustee will also be
returned to the Company. The Restricted Shares that have matured will be transferred to the Offeree (will not be returned to the Company), and accordingly the dividends distributed for them will be transferred to the Offeree. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, Restricted Shares whose maturation is contingent upon performance conditions without mandatory continued employment or service in the Company, as relevant, will not be returned to the Company at the time of termination of the
employment or engagement relations, but at the time of nonfulfillment of the said performance conditions.
|
| 14.7.2. |
In case of termination of employment or engagement relations under circumstances which, in the Company’s view, grant the Company a statutory right to terminate the Offeree without paying
severance compensation, including the commission of criminal offenses and breach of trust, all Restricted Shares that have matured and that have not yet been sold or transferred and the dividends for them will also be returned to the Company
immediately, without consideration.
|
| 14.7.3. |
The provisions of Section 9.3 on the matter of expediting the maturation of Restricted Shares will apply as relevant to Section 14.
|
| 15. |
Restricted share units
|
| 15.1. |
Subject to the sole discretion of the Board, the Board will be allowed to grant, according to this Plan, Restricted Share Units, as defined below, instead of or in addition
to any other grant of Options. At the Exercise Time, the Offerees will pay a sum equal to the par value of the Company’s Shares that will result from the said exercising. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board is allowed to determine, at
its sole discretion, that the Offerees will not pay the par value of the Restricted Share Units upon their granting and that the Company will capitalize part of its profits into share capital or will act in any other way permitted by law in
the case of issue of shares in exchange for a sum lower than their par value, in accordance with the applicable law, including according to Section 304 of the Companies Law.
|
| 15.2. |
A Restricted Share Unit is a right to receive a Share of the Company, after the end of the vesting period of that Restricted Share Unit and removal of the restrictions
applying to it, without any additional action on the part of the Offeree (without giving an Exercise Notice). Upon the end of the vesting period of any Restricted Share Unit and fulfillment of the additional conditions for its maturation, if
applicable, the Restricted Share Unit will be exercised automatically or will become a transferrable Share that is released from any restriction, subject to payment of its par value by the Offeree to the Company (“Restricted Share Unit ”).
|
| 15.3. |
The Board will be allowed to grant performance dependent Restricted Share Units, according to the parameters as will be determined thereby.
|
| 15.4. |
Termination of employment or engagement relations
|
| 15.4.1. |
Unless determined otherwise by the Board, in the case of termination of the employment or engagement relations between the Offeree and the Company, for any reason (including in the case of
death or disability), all of the Restricted Share Units that were granted to the Offeree and whose vesting period has not yet elapsed through to the time of termination of the employment or engagement relations, will immediately expire and
will no longer have any legal effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Restricted Share Units whose maturation is contingent upon performance conditions without mandatory continued employment or service in the Company, as relevant, will not
expire at the time of termination of the employment or engagement relations, but at the time of nonfulfillment of the said performance conditions.
|
| 15.4.2. |
In case of termination of employment or engagement relations under circumstances which, in the Company’s view, grant the Company a statutory right to terminate the Offeree without paying
severance compensation, including the commission of criminal offenses and breach of trust, all Exercise Shares arising from the exercising of the Restricted Share Units and that have not yet been sold or transferred and the dividends for them
will also be returned to the Company immediately, without consideration.
|
| 15.4.3. |
The provisions of Section 9.3 on the matter of expediting the maturation of Restricted Share Units will apply as relevant to Section 15.
|
| 16. |
Undertakings of the Offerees
|
| 17. |
Applicable law
|
| 17.1. |
The Plan and any documents attendant thereto that have been delivered or signed by the Company or an affiliated party thereof in relation to the Plan, will be interpreted,
managed and will be subject to the Laws of the State of Israel.
|
| 17.2. |
The allocation of the Options, the Restricted Share Units and the Restricted Shares according to this Plan is subject to receiving the confirmations and permits required by
law.
|
| 18. |
Power of the Board of the Company
|
| 18.1. |
Subject to statutory provisions and getting the approvals of the required organs, to the extent required, the Board of the Company is authorized to interpret the provisions
of the Plan and give any supplementary or clarifying provision in relation to the execution of the Plan, to the extent required at its discretion.
|
| 18.2. |
Without derogating from the entirety of the foregoing, it is clarified that subject to any statute2, the Board of the Company is authorized, at its sole
discretion, to exercise all powers required for managing the Plan, including establishing the identity of the Offerees, establishing the number of Options, the Restricted Share Units and the Restricted Shares that will be allocated to each of
the Offerees, establishing the allocation dates, establishing the exercise price, establishing the vesting period, the expiration date of the Option Warrants, conditions for removal of the restrictions applying to the Restricted Shares, and
in special cases in which the Board sees fit to do so, to expedite the maturation times of the Option Warrants, the Restricted Share Units and the Restricted Shares that have not yet matured (in part or in full), in relation to some or all of
the Offerees. The Board is also authorized, at its sole, complete discretion, to establish any other resolution that is required or related to the Plan, whether stated in this Plan or not.
|
| 18.3. |
Also, subject to any statute, the Board of the Company is authorized, at its sole discretion, to correct the provisions of the Plan (and the documents attendant thereto)
and/or replace and/or terminate and/or cancel it at any time, as it sees fit. It should also be clarified that the Company will be entitled to change the conditions of the Plan for allocations that have been made for the Offerees, without the
consent of the Offerees, as long as the conditions of the Equity Grants that have already been allocated will have no change made in them that may materially and adversely impact the rights of the Offerees. The Board will determine, at its
sole discretion, whether a particular change materially and adversely impacts the rights of the Bidders.
|
| 18.4. |
The Board is allowed to delegate to its compensation and human resources committee and reserve for specific Offerees (who are not officeholders) the Options, the Restricted
Share Units and the Restricted Shares that will be allocated to the Trustee, according to and subject to the provisions in Section 288(B)(1) of the Companies Law and the applicable law.
|
| 18.5. |
The Company is entitled to adopt appendixes to the Plan that will prescribe specific conditions in relation to the allocation of Equity Grants in certain countries. In the
case of contradiction between the statements in such an appendix and the Plan, the statements in the appendix will take precedence. Appendixes to the Plan will only apply to the Equity Grants that will be given to the Offerees in the relevant
country. The adoption of such an appendix will be subject to approval of the Board, and if required by the Board or a relevant statute, it will also be subject to the approval of the competent organs of the Company, as the case may be.
|
| 19. |
Period of and changes in the Plan
|
| 19.1. |
The Plan will expire at the earlier of (1) the time at which the Board decides to end
the Plan’s period, subject to its discretion and subject to passing a resolution not cancel the Plan; or (2) expiration of all of
the Options, the Restricted Share Units that have been allocated according to the Plan due to a sale event as defined above or as a result of any other event, subject to the discretion of the Board and subject to making a decision to
cancel the Plan; however, all Options, Restricted Share Units that have been allocated according to the Plan and not yet exercised in the case set forth in Subsection (1) above will continue to be valid according to the statements in the
Plan, and all of the directions in the Plan will continue to apply to them.
|
| 19.2. |
The Board may, from time to time, extend, terminate or change this Plan in any form it wishes, including updating the vesting period, the Exercise Times as it sees fit, and
to decree on any question of policy, efficiency, interpretation and application that may arise due to the enactment of the Plan.
|
| 20. |
No undertaking to continue the transaction or engagement
|
| 21. |
Reserved shares
|
| 22. |
Notice of the Plan
|
| (i) |
such Incentive-based Compensation was received by such Covered Executive (A) after the Effective Date, (B) after he or she commenced service as an Executive Officer and (C)
while the Company had a class of securities publicly listed on a United States national securities exchange; and
|
|
(ii)
|
such Covered Executive served as an Executive Officer at any time during the performance period applicable to such Incentive-based Compensation.
|
| (i) |
an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements; or
|
|
(ii)
|
an error that would result in a material misstatement if the error were (A) corrected in the current period or (B) left uncorrected in
the current period.
|
| 2. |
Recoupment of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
|
|
(i)
|
the direct expense paid to a third party to assist in enforcing the recovery
of the Erroneously Awarded Compensation under this Policy would exceed the amount of such Erroneously Awarded Compensation to be recovered; provided that, before concluding that it would
be impracticable to recover any amount of Erroneously Awarded Compensation pursuant to this Section 2(d), the Company shall have first made a reasonable attempt to recover such Erroneously Awarded Compensation, document such reasonable
attempt(s) to make such recovery and provide that documentation to the NYSE;
|
|
(ii)
|
recovery of the Erroneously Awarded Compensation would violate Israeli law to the extent such law was adopted prior to November
28, 2022 (provided that, before concluding that it would be impracticable to recover any amount of Erroneously Awarded Compensation pursuant to this Section 2(d)), the Company shall have first
obtained an opinion of home country counsel of Israel, that is acceptable to the NYSE, that recovery would result in such a violation, and the Company must provide such opinion to the NYSE; or
|
|
(iii)
|
recovery of the Erroneously Awarded Compensation would likely cause an otherwise tax-qualified retirement plan, under which
benefits are broadly available to employees of the Company, to fail to meet the requirements of Sections 401(a)(13) or 411(a) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
|
| 7. |
Miscellaneous.
|
|
Name of Subsidiary / Investee company
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
|
Bromine Compounds Ltd.,
|
Israel
|
|
|
Chemada Fine Chemicals Ltd. (under liquidation)
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Periclase Fused Products Co. (registered partnership in Israel).
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Periclase Ltd. (under liquidation)
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Works Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Edom Mining and Development Ltd. (the operations were transferred to Rotem)
|
Israel
|
|
|
Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
ICL Israel Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Keter Tovala Ltd (the operations were transferred to Rotem)
|
Israel
|
|
|
M.M.M. Company United Landfill, Industries (1998), Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Mifalei Tovala Ltd.,
|
Israel
|
|
|
P.A.M.A. Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Revivim in the Bay Water Environment Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Sherut Integrated transportation services (2013) Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Tami (IMI) Institute for R&D Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
B.K. Giulini Argentina S.A
|
Argentina
|
|
|
Everris Australia Pty Ltd.
|
Australia
|
|
|
Fibrisol Service Australia Pty. Ltd.
|
Australia
|
|
|
Prolactal GmbH
|
Austria
|
|
|
ICL Belgium (Sales) N.V.
|
Belgium
|
|
|
ICL Belgium NV
|
Belgium
|
|
|
Bromisa Industrial e Commercial Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
ICL América do Sul S.A Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
ICL Aditivos e Ingredientes Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Mixmicro Indústria e Comércio de Produtos Químicos Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Nitro 1000 Indústria e Comércio de Produtos Agropecuários e Têxteis Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
ICL Growing Solutions Canada Inc.
|
Canada
|
|
|
ICL Investment Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Lianyungang Dead Sea Bromine Co. Ltd
|
China
|
|
|
Shanghai Tari International Food Additive Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
Name of Subsidiary / Investee company
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
|
Sinobrom Compounds Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Yunnan BK Giulini Tianchuang Phosphate Co. Ltd.,
|
China
|
|
|
Yunnan ICL YTH Phosphate Research and Technology Center Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Yunnan Phosphate Haikou Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Yunnan Tianchuang Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
ICL (Zhangjiagang) International Trading Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Allana Potash Afar PLC (under liquidation)
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
ICL Potash Ethiopia Plc. (under liquidation)
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
Nova Potash PLC (under liquidation)
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
Rotem Manufacturing Private Limited Company
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
ICL France Spécialités SAS
|
France
|
|
|
Protera SAS
|
France
|
|
|
Scora S.A.S.
|
France
|
|
|
BK Giulini GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
BKG Finance GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
Hoyerman Chemie GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Deutschland Ludwigshafen GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Deutschland Vertriebs GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Fertilizers Deutschland GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Holding beschränkt haftende O.H.G. (partnership)
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Holding Germany GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL IP Bitterfeld GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Ludwigshafen Service GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL-IP Bitterfeld Grundbesitz GmbH & Co KG (partnership)
|
Germany
|
|
|
Pulse-Tex GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
Turris Versicherungvermittlung GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
A.R.M. Ltd.,
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
D.D.F.R Corporation Ltd.
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
ICL Asia Ltd.
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
ICL Trading (HK) Ltd.
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
ICL Fertilizers (India) Private Ltd.
|
India
|
|
|
ICL Management and Trading India Private Limited
|
India
|
|
|
ICL Italia Treviso SRL,
|
Italy
|
|
|
ICL Italy SRL Milano
|
Italy
|
|
Name of Subsidiary / Investee company
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
|
ICL Japan Ltd.
|
Japan
|
|
|
Everris Kenya Ltd.
|
Kenya
|
|
|
ICL Korea Ltd.
|
Korea
|
|
|
Everris Malaysia Sdn. Bhd
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
ICL Fosfatos y Aditivos de México S. A. de C.V.
|
Mexico
|
|
|
ICL Polska S.p z.o.o
|
Poland
|
|
|
ICL Romania S.r.l.
|
Romania
|
|
|
ICL Rus LLC
|
Russia
|
|
|
ICL Group Asia Pacific PTE. LTD
|
Singapore
|
|
|
ICL Growing Solutions (Pty) Ltd.
|
South Africa
|
|
|
Everris Iberica Fertilizers S.L.
|
Spain
|
|
|
Fomento y Desarrollo Agrícola S.L
|
Spain
|
|
|
Fuentes Fertilizantes S.L.
|
Spain
|
|
|
Iberpotash S.A.
|
Spain
|
|
|
ICL BM, S.L.
|
Spain
|
|
|
ICL Iberia Ltd. SCA
|
Spain
|
|
|
Logística de Fertilizantes Fuentes S.A
|
Spain
|
|
|
Trafico de Mercancías S.A.
|
Spain
|
|
|
Twincap Forsakrings A.B.
|
Sweden
|
|
|
ICL Swiss (Zug) GmbH
|
Swiss
|
|
|
Intracap Insurance Ltd
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
ICL Fertilizers Tanzania Limited
|
Tanzania
|
|
|
Amsterdam Fertilizers B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
Ashli Chemicals IL B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
Everris International B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Europe B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Europe Coöperatief U.A.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Fertilizers Europe C.V. (partnership)
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Finance B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Puriphos B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL-IP Terneuzen B.V
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
Incap B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
Name of Subsidiary / Investee company
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
|
Rotem Kimyevi Maddeler Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S,
|
Turkey
|
|
|
Amega Sciences Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Cleveland Potash Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Constantine & Company (Export) Limited
|
UK
|
|
|
Everris Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Fibrisol Service Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Greenbest Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
ICL UK (Sales) Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Nutrient Sciences Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
B.K. Mercosur S.A.
|
Uruguay
|
|
|
Custom Ag Formulators, LLC
|
USA
|
|
|
Custom Ag Formulators TX, Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
Everris NA, Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
Growers Holdings Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
Growers Tech Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Americas LLC
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Finance Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Group America Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Specialty products Inc
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Specialty Products North America Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL-IP America Inc.
|
USA
|
|
•
|
Purpose of the Procedure: to review the main prohibitions pertaining to the use of Inside Information and outline the rules of conduct for Employees of ICL who may be in possession of Inside
Information.
|
|
•
|
The main prohibitions: Prohibited use of Inside Information is either of two principal actions, which are prohibited when the person performing such actions or ICL has Inside Information:
|
|
◾
|
Transactions. It is prohibited to execute Transactions in
Securities of ICL, of Israel Corporation or of publicly held subsidiaries of ICL (referred to as "Covered Securities").
It is also prohibited for an Employee to execute Transactions in Securities of other publicly traded companies, if the Employee was
exposed to material non-public information concerning such companies as part of his/her work at ICL
|
|
◾
|
Disclosure of Information. It is prohibited to deliver
information to another person or an opinion on the Covered Securities to another person who may use such information or opinion for a Transaction or disclose them to another person.
|
|
•
|
“Inside information” is, in brief, material information concerning the ICL Group that if it were known to the public this would have materially changed the price of a Covered Security.
|
|
◾
|
Information may be deemed Inside Information even before there is an obligation to publicly
disclose it.
|
|
•
|
Permitted Trading Windows: Transactions in Securities of ICL may only be executed during "Trading Windows" which commence two days following the publication of ICL’s financial statements unless
otherwise specifically instructed, and only pending written confirmation as to the opening of the window, and end on the last day of a calendar quarter.
|
|
◾
|
Transactions while the Trading Window
is closed are strictly forbidden without specific prior approvals as described in the Procedure.
|
|
◾
|
Even during Trading Windows, directors and members of T15
should apply to ICL's Corporate Secretariat ahead of conducting a Transaction in Covered Securities, to verify that there is no Inside Information in ICL.
|
|
•
|
Specifically prohibited types of Transactions in Covered
Securities: The Procedure sets forth several types of Transactions in Covered Securities that Employees are required to
categorically abstain from: Pledging Covered Securities, hedging Transactions, speculative Transactions. Key Insiders are also required not to enter into opposing Transactions (sale and then purchase and vice versa) within a 3
month period.
|
|
•
|
Non-Disclosure Undertakings: In order to ensure that third parties who have access to Inside Information of ICL do not disclose such information or trade on the basis of such information, all
such third parties are required to execute a non-disclosure and no-trade undertaking.
|
| 1. |
Scope and Purpose
|
| 2. |
Responsibilities
|
| 2.1. |
The General Counsel of ICL and the GCO are responsible for implementing the Procedures set forth in this Procedure at ICL.
|
| 2.2. |
The relevant Regional General Counsel is responsible for implementing this Procedure in each region.
|
| 2.3. |
The CEO of ICL is authorized to change the identity or duties of the entities responsible for this Procedure.
|
| 3. |
Definitions of Key Terms
|
|
Covered Securities
|
Securities of ICL, of Israel Corporation and of publicly held subsidiaries of ICL (if any exist).
|
|
Employee
|
Any of the following –
1. Any person that
is employed by ICL
2. Insiders
3. Key Insiders
4. Employees of
entities in the ICL Group
|
|
Family Member
|
A spouse, sibling, parent, offspring or offspring of the spouse, or any household member of any of the above.
|
|
Insider
|
Any of the following -
1. Directors of ICL,
the CEO of ICL, Major Shareholders of ICL, or any other person whose status or function in, or relations with, ICL gives him/her access to Inside Information on, or within six months prior to, the day on which use of the inside
information is made.
2. Family Members
of any person mentioned in sections 1 and 2.
3. Entities
Controlled by any person mentioned in sections 1 and 2.
4. Employees of
ICL's headquarters.
5. Members of
T100.
|
|
Key Insider
|
Any of the following -
1. Directors of ICL,
the CEO of ICL, the deputy CEO of ICL, T100 members, controller, internal auditor, and any person carrying out one of the said functions under a different title.
2. Major
Shareholders of ICL;
3. A Family Member
of any person mentioned in sections 1 and 2;
4. An entity
Controlled by any person mentioned in sections 1, 2 and 3.
|
|
Major Shareholder
|
A shareholder holding, directly or indirectly, alone or in concert with others, 5% or more of a company's issued share capital or voting power or entitled to
appoint one or more directors.
|
|
Securities
|
Certificates issued in series by a company, a cooperative society or any other corporation conferring a right of membership or
participation in them or claim against them, and certificates conferring a right to acquire securities, all of which whether registered or bearer securities, excluding certain securities issued by the Government or by the Bank of Israel.
|
|
Underlying Asset
|
The asset to which an obligation in a Security is linked.
|
| • |
Affiliate – mean as defined in Section 1 of the Securities Law.
|
| • |
Control, Subsidiary - mean as defined in Section 1, and Holding,
for the purpose of this Procedure - directly or indirectly, alone or in concert with others. .
|
| 4. |
Restrictions on the Use of Inside Information - The Basic Rules
|
| 4.1. |
General. Israeli and U.S. securities laws prohibit companies and individuals from executing Transactions in securities while possessing
Inside Information. The main purpose of the prohibition is to prevent the exploitation of an unfair advantage in trading securities, arising from access to information on a company, which is not accessible to the public of investors.
|
| 4.2. |
Use of Inside Information. Generally, a person would be deemed to have used Inside Information if he or she did one of the following:
|
| a. |
Transactions while in possession of Inside Information. Performed a Transaction in Security of a company, or in a Security of which the Security of such company is an
Underlying Asset, while in possession of Inside Information or while the company is in possession of Insider Information.
|
|
Note: there is no requirement to prove that there is a connection between the possession of
Inside Information and the Transaction in order for it to be considered use of Inside Information.
|
| b. |
Provision of Inside Information to another person. Delivered Inside Information or opinion on the Securities of a company, or on a Security of which the Security of such
company is an Underlying Asset, while in possession of Inside Information, to any person, who he/she knows or has grounds to believe that will use the Inside Information or the opinion, or will pass it to another, for the purpose of a
Transaction in Securities.
|
| 4.3. |
The Key Prohibitions. The Israeli Securities Law sets forth the following main prohibitions:
|
| a. |
an Insider may not make use of Inside Information. Under the Israeli Securities Law, an Insider may be deemed to have made use of Inside
Information even if such information was not in his or her possession but in the possession of the company.
|
| b. |
a person may not make use of Inside Information if it came into his or her possession, directly or
indirectly, from an Insider.
|
| 4.4. |
When would ICL or another ICL Group Entity be deemed to have access to Inside Information? - As a rule, a corporation will be deemed to
have access to Inside Information or to be in possession of Inside Information if a director or Employee of the corporation has access to information or has information in his possession, subject to the exceptions set forth in the Israeli
Securities Law.
|
|
WHEN IN DOUBT - ABSTAIN AND CHECK
A breach of the insider trading laws could expose the Insider to imprisonment, criminal fines, administrative enforcement
measures and civil penalties.
In case of doubt as to whether or not a certain Transaction is prohibited, abstain from executing the Transaction and
check the restrictions with the legal department.
|
| 5. |
What is “Inside Information”?
|
| 5.1. |
The Israeli Securities Law defines “Inside Information” as -
|
|
"Information regarding a development or expected development
in a company or regarding a change or expected change in its situation, or any other information regarding a company, which is not known to the public and which, if it became known to the public, might cause a significant change in the price of the company’s securities, or in the price of a different security for which the company’s Security is the Underlying Asset"
|
| 5.2. |
Materiality.
|
| a. |
General. Although the Securities Law does not explicitly address the materiality of the information, it is customary, as an auxiliary tool,
to examine the materiality of the information in question in order to assess its potential impact on the price of the company’s securities.
|
| b. |
Examining Materiality. As a general rule of thumb, an information regarding a certain event would be deemed material if it is considered a
"Material Event" under ICL's Periodic and Immediate Reports Procedure (Chapter 3 of the Program), i.e., if its potential quantitative effect crosses a 5% threshold. An event may be deemed insider information even if it does not meet such
materiality threshold, based on qualitative considerations.
|
| c. |
U.S. law definitions. “Inside information” and “materiality” under U.S. law are concepts similar to Inside Information and “materiality,”
under Israeli law. Information is “inside information” under the U.S. securities laws if it has not been publicly disclosed in a manner making it available to investors generally on a broad-based non-exclusionary basis. Information is
“material” under the U.S. securities laws if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision. The meanings of these terms have been further elaborated in the United
States primarily through case law.
|
|
All queries as to whether information may be considered material inside information under the U.S.
securities laws should be referred to ICL's General Counsel.
|
| d. |
"Red Flags" – below is a non-exhaustive list of events that may deemed Inside Information:
|
|
The intention to issue immediate reports and the withholding of the filing of an immediate report .
|
|
Information that was gathered on the results of operations, including annual or quarterly results, primarily during the period between formulation of the financial results as part
of the process of preparing the consolidated financial statements of ICL and their formal publication.
|
|
Note: According to ICL’s policy, from the time that
drafts of financial statements or financial data arrive at ICL headquarters by means of the SAP system or in another manner, of the subsidiaries or segments of ICL (such data is usually transferred up to seven business days from the end
of the quarter), such information is considered to be Inside Information.
Without derogating from the provisions below regarding "trading windows", when considering a Transaction between the end of a financial
quarter and the publication of ICL's financial results, the existence of Inside Information should be checked with ICL's legal department.
|
|
Intention to raise equity and/or debt of substantial amount.
|
|
Information on significant Transactions, such as a significant merger, purchase or sale of material assets/operations, or material joint ventures, and material events that
occurred, are occurring or expected to occur in companies of ICL Group, whether their effect on the company’s results is positive or not.
|
|
Change of business plan or dividend distribution policy in ICL.
|
|
Known material effects arising from implementing accounting standards (that were not published in the past).
|
|
Valuation of material asset of ICL.
|
|
Significant regulatory developments.
|
|
Information in connection with changes in debt ratings.
|
|
Significant developments in connection with important customers.
|
|
Ongoing or possible material legal proceedings, to which a company of the ICL Group is a party.
|
|
Negotiations with regard to one of the above, including a development in negotiations, renewal of negotiations that were halted and/or closing business conditions.
|
|
Material changes (or expected material changes) in the market or business environment of the ICL Group.
|
|
Any other information which, due to its nature, could be deemed material information.
|
|
Note: The above list of "red flags" is aimed to assist ICL and its Employees in
identifying potential Inside Information. The fact that a certain type of information is on the List does not necessarily mean that said information will be deemed Inside Information, and vise versa. Each matter should be examined on a
case-by-case basis.
|
| 5.3. |
Withheld immediate reports are deemed as Inside Information. If ICL is withholding an immediate report pursuant to Regulation 36(B) of
the Israeli Securities Regulations (Reporting), the information to be reported in such immediate report is deemed to be Inside Information, as long as it is not
public.
|
| 5.4. |
When does information cease to be "Inside Information"? - The Securities Law defines a period of one trading day following the public
filing of the information with the ISA and TASE. However, according to the ISA’s interpretive position and proposed amendment to the Securities Law, information will no longer be deemed as Inside Information following 30 minutes of its
reporting to the public via MAGNA - ISA’s reporting system.
|
| 6. |
"Transactions" in "Securities" – what is a "Transaction"? what are "Securities"?
|
| 6.1. |
Types of Securities subject to this Procedure.
|
| a. |
General. Under the Israeli Securities Law, the restrictions on the use of Inside Information apply to Securities that have been offered to the public by a prospectus or that
are traded on the stock exchange, (including shares, bonds, convertible Securities and commercial papers) and other securities which the Securities of the company are their Underlying Asset. For purposes of compliance with U.S. securities
laws, the prohibition on trading securities while in the possession of material inside information includes orders for purchases and sales of stock and convertible securities.
|
| b. |
Exercise of Employee Options. Under US Securities Law, the exercise of employee stock options is not subject to this Procedure. However, it is subject to this Procedure
under Israeli Securities Law. In addition, the shares acquired when the option is exercised are treated like any other shares.
|
| c. |
Securities Subject to this Procedure. This Procedure generally applies to Transactions in the following Securities, although there may be additional types of Securities
subject to the Procedure if they fall within the above definition (which we refer to in this procedure as "Covered Securities"):
|
| • |
Securities of ICL.
|
| • |
Securities of Israel Corporation.
|
| • |
Securities of publicly held subsidiaries of ICL (to the extent there are any).
|
| 6.2. |
Types of Transactions subject to this Procedure.
|
|
Note: The size of the Transaction is not relevant when determining whether the prohibition
on insider trading was violated. There are precedents where legal proceedings were initiated for Transactions in relatively small amounts.
|
| 7. |
Permitted Trading Windows and prohibited periods for Transactions in ICL Securities
|
| 7.1. |
The Rule - Trading during Trading Windows Only. Transactions in Securities of ICL may only be executed during the period commencing two
trading days following the publication of ICL’s financial statements, and only pending written confirmation as to the opening of the window, and ending the last day of a calendar quarter (a "Trading Window"),
unless specifically instructed otherwise by ICL. The Trading Window for the first quarter will commence two trading days following the publication of the Q4 results and PR, unless otherwise specifically instructed by ICL.
|
| 7.2. |
Exceptions to the Rule - Transactions outside the Trading Window:
|
| a. |
Safe Harbor Plans. The foregoing restrictions do not apply to Transactions pursuant to written plans for trading securities that comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act and with the ISA guidelines (as applicable) (“Safe Harbor Plan”).
|
|
Note: Safe Harbor Plans may not be entered into, amended or terminated without the prior
approval of the General Counsel of ICL, which will be given only during a Trading Window period.
|
| b. |
Prior Approval. In unique circumstances, such as exceptional personal hardship or near expiration of options, ICL's CEO and General Counsel may approve executing a
Transaction in ICL Securities not during a trading window, provided that: (1) this exemption will not apply to T15 members, (2) prior to granting such approval, the Employee will certify that they do not possess Inside Information. Such
certification will be in writing and will be kept in the Global Corporate Secretariat.
|
| c. |
Extension of period for exercising options. In unique circumstances, when a “Prior Approval”, as
described in section b. above, is not applicable, ICL’s CEO and General Counsel may decide to extend the period for exercising the options by up to 60 business days starting from the day the trading window re-opens (for further details
regarding the trading window period, see section 7.1 above).
|
| 7.3. |
Closing of "Trading Window"; No Trading while in Possession of Inside Information even during a Trading Window.
|
| a. |
No Transaction in Securities of ICL is to be made if notification was given to the Employees by ICL regarding a prohibition on performing any Transactions in its Securities, from
the time of such notification until the receipt of another notification stating otherwise. A notification regarding the closing of a "Trading Window" may be sent only to some employees and not all Insiders and is not required to detail the
grounds for closing the "Trading Window".
|
| b. |
If an Insider or ICL are in possession of Inside Information during a Trading Window, the Insider is not allowed to trade ICL Securities, even if the Trading Window is "open".
|
|
Note: ICL may not always notify of the closing of a Trading Window when there is Inside
Information in the Company. An Insider who believes he or she are in possession of Inside Information may not trade ICL Securities before clearing with the ICL General Counsel.
The fact that there ICL issued a notification of the closing of a Trading Window may, in itself, be
deemed as Inside Information. An Employee is not allowed to disclose such matters.
|
| c. |
Even during Trading Windows, Directors and members of T15 should apply to ICL's Corporate Secretariat ahead of conducting a Transaction in Covered Securities, to
verify that there is no Inside Information in ICL.
|
| 8. |
Rules of Conduct
|
| 8.1. |
No Transactions in Covered Securities, except during Trading Windows. See section 7 above. This rule has
certain limited exceptions, all of which require approval by at least the ICL General Counsel.
|
| 8.2. |
No Transactions in Covered Securities while in possession of Inside Information (even during Trading Windows). An Employee who is in possession of Inside Information concerning the ICL Group, or who knows that ICL is in possession of such Inside Information, may not execute a Transaction in Covered Securities nor disclose any Inside
Information or opine on Covered Securities to any person. Any exception to this rule requires prior approval by the ICL General Counsel.
|
|
If an Insider has any doubt as to whether or not he or she is in possession of Inside Information, he/she must abstain
from making any Transaction and consult with the ICL General Counsel or Global Compliance Officer.
|
| 8.3. |
Transactions in Covered Securities by ICL or an ICL Group Company.
|
| a. |
Before executing a Transaction in a Covered Security on behalf of ICL or a member of the ICL Group, ICL's General Counsel or Global Compliance Officer and ICL's CFO will conduct a
process for examining whether ICL is in possession of Inside Information. The process will include verifying with the relevant Employees whether or not any Inside Information exists in the company.
|
| b. |
The process will be documented and the records of the examination and answers received will be kept at the Global Corporate Secretariat.
|
| c. |
In case of Transactions for buying/selling Securities over time, the examination should be made each day, and all relevant persons would be required to update of any changes or
developments since the last time they confirmed no Inside Information exists.
|
| d. |
In the absence of a confirmation that no Inside Information exists, a Transaction in Covered Securities will not be executed.
|
| 8.4. |
"Opposing Transactions" by Key Insiders should be avoided. The Israeli Securities Law sets forth
a presumption that if a Key Insider purchased Securities of a company, or other Securities of which Securities such Company an Underlying Asset, within three months from the date on which he sold such Securities, or vice-versa, this will
constitute prima facie evidence that the Key Insider made use of Inside Information, unless the Key Insider proves that he or she was not in possession of Inside Information at the time of the Transaction or that in the relevant circumstances
it is reasonable that the Key Insider was not in possession of Inside Information at that time. Key Insiders are therefore required to avoid executing opposing Transactions in Covered Securities within a three-month period.
|
| 8.5. |
Types of Transactions in Covered Securities that are NOT allowed:
|
| a. |
Pledging of securities; margin accounts. ICL prohibits Employees from pledging Covered Securities in any circumstance, including by purchasing Covered Securities on margin
or holding Covered Securities in a margin account. The reason for this prohibition is that pledged Securities may be sold by the pledgee without the pledgor’s consent under certain conditions. For example, Securities held in a margin account
may be sold by a broker without the customer’s consent if the customer fails to meet a margin call, and such a sale may occur at a time when an Employee has Inside Information or is otherwise not permitted to trade in the company’s
Securities.
|
| b. |
Hedging Transactions. Employees are prohibited from engaging in any hedging Transactions (including Transactions involving options, puts, calls, prepaid variable forward
contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds or other derivatives) that are designed to hedge or speculate on any change in the market value of the equity securities of the Company. Trading in options or other derivatives is generally
highly speculative and very risky. People who buy options are betting that the stock price will move rapidly. For that reason, when a person trades in options in his employer’s stock, it will arouse suspicion in the eyes of the SEC or the ISA
that the person was trading on the basis of Inside Information, particularly where the trading occurs before a company announcement or major event. It is difficult for an Employee to prove that he did not know about the announcement or event.
For all these reasons, the Company prohibits its Employees from trading in options or other securities involving the Company’s shares
|
| c. |
Avoid speculation. Investing in the ICL’s ordinary shares and taking part in ICL’s future growth do not mean short range speculation
based on fluctuations in the market. Such activities put the personal gain of the Employee in conflict with the best interests of ICL and its shareholders. Although this Procedure does not mean that Employees may never sell shares, ICL
encourages Employees to avoid frequent trading of its shares, as speculation is ICL’s shares is not part of ICL’s culture.
|
| 8.6. |
No trading in Covered Shares through investment portfolio managers. If Employees manage their investments through investment portfolio
managers who are authorized to execute Transactions at their discretion, the portfolio managers must be instructed not to trade in Covered Securities.
|
| 8.7. |
No trading in Securities of other companies if in possession of material non-public information. Employees who learn material
information about suppliers, customers or competitors through their work at ICL should keep it confidential and not purchase or sell Securities of such companies until said information becomes public.
|
| 8.8. |
Inform Relatives of Restrictions. Under the Israeli Securities Law, an individual and Relatives who share residence with such individual
are viewed as one person. Insiders are required to inform their adult Relatives who reside with them of the substance of this Procedure and act, to the extent possible, to ensure compliance with the Procedure.
|
| 8.9. |
Limitations on disclosing information concerning the ICL Group.
|
| a. |
Cautious Disclosure of Information. An Employee of the ICL Group should refrain from discussing or providing Inside Information
concerning the ICL Group to persons outside the Group, except, and as required, in the framework of carrying out his ordinary duties. If the information is given to persons outside the Group, provided that such persons signed a
confidentiality agreement in accordance with ICL’s Procedures.
|
|
Employees are required to take extra precautions in their conversations (including with Family Members) in order not to
expose or disclose information that might be Inside Information.
|
| b. |
Obligation of external consultants to maintain confidentiality. If third party service providers to ICL are expected to be exposed
to Inside Information, they will be required to sign a confidentiality undertaking substantially in the form attached as Appendix A or such other form as shall be approved by ICL's Global Compliance Officer or General Counsel. Signing a
confidentiality undertaking is not mandatory where the service provider is subject to legal or ethical confidentiality obligations (e.g. - legal advisors or auditors).
|
| 8.10. |
Special cases. If it is suspected that, notwithstanding the provisions of this Procedure a Transaction in Covered Securities was
executed contrary to the provisions of this Procedure or in possession of Inside Information, it must be reported immediately to the ICL General Counsel and to the Global Compliance Officer. ICL's General Counsel or the Global Compliance
Officer will conduct an urgent examination of the matter in question and will decide if, indeed, there is any substance to said suspicion, and will determine the manner of the continued handling of the issue.
|
| 8.11. |
In any case of doubt the General Counsel of the Company must be consulted and, if necessary, the Compliance Officer as well.
|
| 9. |
Schedules and Appendices
|
|
Appendix A
|
Form of Undertaking Not to Use Inside Information
|
|
Schedule 1
|
List of persons to receive notices of opening and closing of Trading Windows
|
|
•
|
Purposes of the Procedure:
|
|
◾
|
To identify and prohibit certain types of practices and transactions that may be considered under
certain circumstances as fraudulent or manipulative according to Israeli and/or U.S. securities laws.
|
|
◾
|
To provide guidelines for other types of transactions in ICL securities, specifically repurchases
of shares and resales of securities.
|
|
•
|
The main prohibitions:
|
|
◾
|
General. It is prohibited for Employees of ICL to induce
or attempt to induce a person to purchase or sell securities of ICL or of any other entity, with statements, promises or projections, in writing, verbally or otherwise, when the Employee knows or ought to know that the statements,
promises or forecasts are false, misleading or materially incomplete.
|
|
◾
|
Suspicious Transactions. It is prohibited to execute
fraudulent transactions affecting the market price of securities. The following types or suspicious transactions are specifically forbidden:
|
|
-
|
"Single Trader Transactions" - simultaneous sales and purchases of the same security by the
same person or persons on his/her behalf.
|
|
-
|
"Coordinated Transactions" - sale and purchase of the same security by two persons acting
in coordination, affecting the price of the security.
|
|
-
|
"Stabilization" - purchasing or selling securities during a distribution period of the
securities (such as a public offering).
|
|
◾
|
Publication of Information about the ICL Group. Must be
made only in compliance with the Procedure governing periodic and immediate reports and disclosure of Material Non-Public Information (see Chapter No. 3 of the Program).
|
|
•
|
Other limitations on transactions in securities of ICL.
The Procedure addresses additional types of transactions in ICL securities, including repurchases of shares by ICL or its subsidiary (which may only be done with the prior approval of ICL's
General Counsel) and resales.
|
| 1. |
Scope and Purpose
|
| 1.1. |
Actions or Transactions that constitute fraud or manipulation in connection with securities are prohibited under the Israeli Securities Law and may constitute criminal offences or
administrative violations that do not require proof of criminal intent. In addition, the failure to disclose material facts or the use of false or misleading statements or any other manipulative or deceptive practices in connection with the
purchase or sale of any security is unlawful under the U.S. Exchange Act.
|
| 1.2. |
The purposes of this Procedure are -
|
| • |
to identify and prohibit certain types of practices and transactions that may be considered under certain circumstances as fraudulent or manipulative and Israeli and/or U.S.
securities laws.
|
| • |
To provide guidelines for other types of transactions in ICL securities, specifically repurchases of shares and resales of securities.
|
| 1.3. |
This Procedure applies to transactions in ICL securities by directors, Officers or employees of the ICL Group, referred to in this procedure as "Employees"
and also to transactions in securities of ICL or of other entities by ICL.
|
| 2. |
Responsibilities
|
| 2.1. |
ICL's General Counsel and Global Compliance Officer are responsible for implementing this Procedure at ICL.
|
| 2.2. |
The relevant Regional General Counsel is responsible for implementing this Procedure in each region.
|
| 2.3. |
The CEO of ICL is authorized to change the identity or duties of the entities responsible for this Procedure.
|
|
In any case of doubt as to the proper treatment of a contemplated or existing transaction in securities, the General
Counsel of ICL should be contacted immediately for instructions.
|
| 3. |
Guidelines and rules of conduct pertaining to fraud and manipulation
|
| 3.1. |
Using fraudulent, misleading, or nondisclosed information
|
| a. |
An Employee of ICL shall not motivate or attempt to induce a person to purchase or sell securities of ICL or of any other entity, with statements, promises or
projections, in writing, verbally or otherwise, when the Employee knows or ought to know that the statements, promises or forecasts are false, misleading or materially incomplete.
|
| b. |
An Employee of ICL shall not make any statement, promise or projection to a person, whether in writing, verbally or otherwise, which the Employee knows or ought to
know that is false, misleading or materially incomplete, when the Employee knows or should know that his actions would motivate such person to purchase or sell securities of ICL or of any other entity.
|
| c. |
Nondisclosure of information that is required to be disclosed by law, or the existence of a misleading fact in a report of ICL may also be considered a Securities
fraud.
|
| 3.2. |
Affecting the price of Securities - Prohibited Types of Transactions.
|
| a. |
General prohibition on fraudulent transactions affecting market price. Employees of ICL are prohibited from fraudulently
affecting the rate fluctuations of Securities (of ICL or any other corporation).
|
| b. |
Single Trader Transactions. Employees of ICL are prohibited from performing a "Single
Trader Transaction" in Securities, namely - The sale and purchase, at the same time, of the same security, by the same person or someone on his behalf, which affects the price of the security on the stock exchange.
|
| c. |
Coordinated Transactions. Employees of ICL are prohibited from performing "Coordinated
Transactions" in securities, namely - the sale and purchase of the same Security by two or more persons, executed by prior coordination among the parties, which affected the rate of the security on the TASE (except for a "Matching
Transaction" in securities on TASE, marked as such in accordance with the bylaws of the TASE).
|
| d. |
"Stabilization"; Regulation M.
|
| • |
It is prohibited for Employees of ICL to conduct "Stabilization" transactions, namely - the purchase or sale of Securities,
by an interested party, prior to or after the public filing of a prospectus (or other offering document such as a shelf offering report) that affected the rate of the Security in favor of the issue, all while concealing material information
pertaining to the Stabilization actions and the time of their implementation.
|
| • |
In order to prevent market manipulation, the SEC adopted Regulation M under the Exchange Act. Regulation M generally restricts the Company or any of its affiliates
from buying Company shares, including as part of a share buyback program, in the open market during certain periods while a distribution, such as a public offering, is taking place. ICL's General Counsel should be consulted if any purchases
of ICL securities are to be made during any period that the Company is conducting an offering or buying shares from the public.
|
|
Without derogating from the generality of the foregoing or from any other Procedure prohibiting
transactions in ICL securities, in order to avoid the risk of potential illegal Stabilization, all Employees of ICL are prohibited from selling or purchasing securities of ICL from the time a prospectus or
draft prospectus, shelf offering report or other offering document is published by ICL and until the lapse of 30 days from the completion of the offering of securities, unless specific prior approval was obtained from ICL's General
Counsel
|
| 3.3. |
Publication of information about the ICL Group
|
| a. |
Any message from ICL, regarding ICL, to entities outside the Company, such as the media, analysts, investors or other people in the financial community, will only
be delivered through the representatives authorized for that purpose.
|
| b. |
Confidential information that has not yet been disclosed (including the fact that such information exists) may not be disclosed other than by those authorized for
such disclosure.
|
| c. |
No opinion may be made or stated with respect to the prices of ICL's securities or on the advisability of investing in such securities.
|
| d. |
Caution must be exercised to avoid being drawn into addressing sensitive subjects as specified above when responding questions from analysts / journalists.
|
| 4. |
Other limitations on transactions in securities of ICL
|
| 4.1. |
Repurchases of Shares by ICL or a Subsidiary of ICL
|
| a. |
Repurchases of shares by ICL or by a subsidiary of ICL are subject to limitations set forth in the Israeli Companies Law, the Israeli Securities Law and U.S.
Securities laws.
|
|
Any repurchase of shares, either in a one-time transaction or pursuant to a
repurchase program, either through orders placed on the stock exchange or in off-market transactions requires the prior approval of ICL's General Counsel.
|
| b. |
When examining whether to approve a transaction in securities of ICL, ICL's General Counsel will, among other matters, examine the compliance of the proposed
transaction with the following restrictions and prohibitions:
|
| • |
The rules of distribution set forth in the Israeli Companies Law.
|
| • |
The Israeli Companies Law's requirement for a tender offer for acquisitions leading to the crossing of certain thresholds by shareholders of a company.
|
| • |
The requirement in ICL's Articles of Association for approval of the Government of Israel for acquisitions leading to the crossing of certain thresholds.
|
| • |
Israeli Antitrust merger rules.
|
| • |
U.S. tender offer rules and disclosure requirements relating to repurchases.
|
| • |
Israeli and U.S. laws prohibiting the use of inside information.
|
| 4.2. |
Resales by ICL or a Subsidiary of ICL
|
| 4.3. |
Restrictions on the Use of Inside Information
|
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ICL Group Ltd.;
|
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
|
|
4.
|
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
|
|
5.
|
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
|
| /s/ Raviv Zoller | |
|
Raviv Zoller
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ICL Group Ltd.;
|
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
|
|
4.
|
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
|
|
5.
|
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
|
| /s/ Aviram Lahav | |
|
Aviram Lahav
Chief Financial Officer
|
| 1. |
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|
| 2. |
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ICL Group Ltd.
|
| /s/ Raviv Zoller | |
|
Raviv Zoller
|
|
|
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
| /s/ Aviram Lahav | |
|
Aviram Lahav
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE BOULBY MINING OPERATION,
UNITED KINGDOM
February 27, 2025
|
|
Wardell Armstrong (part of SLR)
Baldhu House, Wheal Jane Earth Science Park, Baldhu, Truro, Cornwall, TR3 6EH,
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)1872 560738 www.wardell-armstrong.com
|
|
|
EFFECTIVE DATE:
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
DATE ISSUED:
|
February 27, 2025
|
|
JOB NUMBER:
|
ZT61-2273
|
|
VERSION:
REPORT NUMBER:
STATUS:
|
V3.0
MM1808
Final
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE BOULBY MINING OPERATION, UNITED KINGDOM
|
|
|
Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong International Ltd,
Registered in England No. 3813172. Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom
UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Bolton, Bristol, Bury St Edmunds, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh,
Glasgow, Leeds, London, Newcastle upon Tyne and Truro. International Office: Almaty.
|
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
LAND AND PROPERTY
MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING
MINERAL ESTATES
WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE
BOULBY MINING OPERATION, UNITED KINGDOM
|
|
|
1
|
|
1.1
|
Property Description
|
1
|
|
|
1.2
|
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
2
|
|
|
1.3
|
History
|
2
|
|
|
1.4
|
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
4
|
|
|
1.5
|
Exploration
|
4
|
|
|
1.6
|
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
5
|
|
|
1.7
|
Data Verification
|
5 | |
|
1.8
|
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
6
|
|
|
1.9
|
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
6
|
|
|
1.10
|
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
7
|
|
|
1.11
|
Mining Methods
|
7
|
|
|
1.12
|
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
8
|
|
|
1.13
|
Infrastructure
|
8
|
|
|
1.14
|
Market Studies
|
8
|
|
|
1.15
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
8 | |
|
1.16
|
Capital, Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
9
|
|
|
1.17
|
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
9
|
|
|
1.18
|
Recommendations
|
9 |
|
11
|
|
2.1
|
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
11
|
|
|
2.2
|
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
12 | |
|
2.3
|
Sources of Information
|
12
|
|
|
2.4
|
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
13
|
|
|
2.5
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
13
|
|
|
2.6
|
Units and Abbreviations
|
14
|
|
17
|
|
3.1
|
Tenure
|
18 | |
|
3.2
|
Agreements
|
20 | |
|
3.3
|
Royalties and Rents
|
20 | |
|
3.4
|
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
21 |
|
22
|
|
4.1
|
Accessibility
|
22 | |
|
4.2
|
Climate
|
22 | |
|
4.3
|
Local Resources
|
22 | |
|
4.4
|
Infrastructure
|
23 | |
|
4.5
|
Physiography
|
23 |
|
24
|
|
5.1
|
Ownership, Development and Exploration History
|
24 | |
|
5.2
|
Production History
|
25 |
|
26
|
|
6.1
|
Regional Geology
|
26 | |
|
6.2
|
Local and Property Geology
|
28
|
|
|
6.3
|
Mineralisation
|
33 | |
|
6.4
|
Deposit Type
|
36 |
|
38
|
|
7.1
|
Seismic Surveys
|
38
|
|
|
7.2
|
Drilling
|
40 | |
|
7.3
|
QP Opinion
|
46 |
|
47
|
|
8.1
|
Sample Preparation
|
47 | |
|
8.2
|
Analysis Method
|
48 | |
|
8.3
|
Sample Security
|
49 | |
|
8.4
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
|
49 | |
|
8.5
|
QP Opinion
|
62 |
|
63
|
|
9.1
|
Site Visits
|
63 | |
|
9.2
|
Drillhole Database
|
63 | |
|
9.3
|
QP Opinion
|
63 |
|
65
|
|
10.1
|
Feed Grade and Final Product Grade Relationship
|
65 |
|
67
|
|
11.1
|
Summary
|
67 | |
|
11.2
|
Database
|
68 | |
|
11.3
|
Domaining
|
69 | |
|
11.4
|
Geostatistics
|
74 | |
|
11.5
|
Block Model
|
76 | |
|
11.6
|
Density
|
76 | |
|
11.7
|
Grade Estimation, Validation and Reconciliation
|
76 | |
|
11.8
|
Mineral Resource Classification
|
83 | |
|
11.9
|
Depletion
|
86 | |
|
11.10
|
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
86 | |
|
11.11
|
Mineral Resource Statement
|
87 | |
|
11.12
|
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
87 |
|
88
|
|
12.1
|
Summary
|
88 | |
|
12.2
|
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
89 | |
|
12.3
|
Mining Blocks
|
89 | |
|
12.4
|
Mine Layout
|
89 | |
|
12.5
|
Mining Losses
|
90
|
|
|
12.6
|
Dilution
|
90 | |
|
12.7
|
Cut-Off Grade
|
90 |
|
|
12.8
|
Mine Sequencing and Scheduling
|
91 | |
|
12.9
|
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
91 | |
|
12.10
|
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
91 |
|
92
|
|
13.1
|
Geotechnical
|
92 | |
|
13.2
|
Mine Design Layouts
|
95 | |
|
13.3
|
Hydrogeology
|
96 | |
|
13.4
|
Mine Production
|
96 | |
|
13.5
|
Underground Infrastructure
|
97
|
|
|
13.6
|
Production
|
100
|
|
|
13.7
|
Life of Mine Plan
|
100 | |
|
13.8
|
Mining Equipment
|
101
|
|
|
13.9
|
Mining Personnel
|
102 |
|
103
|
|
14.1
|
Polysulphate® Process Description
|
103
|
|
|
14.2
|
PotashpluS® Process Description
|
104 | |
|
14.3
|
Processing Personnel
|
105 |
|
106
|
|
15.1
|
Surface Layout
|
106
|
|
|
15.2
|
Roads
|
107 | |
|
15.3
|
Rail
|
107
|
|
|
15.4
|
Port
|
107 | |
|
15.5
|
Energy
|
108
|
|
|
15.6
|
Water
|
108
|
|
|
15.7
|
Effluent Tunnel / Dewatering
|
108
|
|
|
15.8
|
Waste Tips and Stockpiles
|
108
|
|
109
|
|
16.1
|
Commodity Price Projections
|
109
|
|
|
16.2
|
Contracts
|
109 |
|
110
|
|
17.1
|
Permitting
|
110 | |
|
17.2
|
Chemicals and Fuel
|
111
|
|
|
17.3
|
Chemicals Underground
|
111 | |
|
17.4
|
Waste Management and Disposal
|
111
|
|
|
17.5
|
Air Quality and Noise
|
112 | |
|
17.6
|
Community and Social
|
113
|
|
|
17.7
|
Health and Safety
|
115 | |
|
17.8
|
Mine Closure Plan
|
116 | |
|
17.9
|
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
117 |
|
118
|
|
18.1
|
Capital Costs
|
118
|
|
|
18.2
|
Operating Costs
|
118
|
|
119
|
|
19.1
|
Economic Criteria
|
119
|
|
|
19.2
|
Cash Flow Analysis
|
120
|
|
|
19.3
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
121 |
|
123
|
|
124
|
|
125
|
|
22.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
125
|
|
|
22.2
|
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
125
|
|
|
22.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
125
|
|
|
22.4
|
Infrastructure
|
125
|
|
|
22.5
|
Environment
|
125
|
|
126
|
|
23.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
126
|
|
|
23.2
|
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
126
|
|
|
23.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
126 | |
|
23.4
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
126
|
|
127
|
|
128
|
|
129
|
|
Table 1.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Boulby Mine – December 31, 2024
|
6
|
|
Table 1.2: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Boulby Mine – December 31, 2024
|
7
|
|
Table 7.1: Test Results for Assessing for Potential Brine Contamination of Samples
|
43
|
|
Table 7.2: Summary of Drillholes Used in Mineral Resource Estimation (LHD Drilling)
|
45
|
|
Table 8.1: Control Data May 2018 – December 2020
|
50
|
|
Table 8.2: Standard and Blank Control Limits Prior to July 2023
|
53
|
|
Table 8.3: Duplicate Sample Control Limits Prior to July 2023
|
53
|
|
Table 8.4: Standard and Blank Control Limits Prior After July 2023
|
54
|
|
Table 8.5: Nelson Rules for Detecting Systematic Errors of Bias
|
54
|
|
Table 8.6: Duplicate Sample Control Limits After July 2023
|
55
|
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Boulby Mine – December 31, 2024
|
68
|
|
Table 11.2: Seams Modelled
|
69
|
|
Table 11.3: Search Parameters for Grade Estimation
|
77
|
|
Table 11.4: Comparison of K in Input Sample Data and Estimated Blocks by Domain
|
77
|
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Boulby Mine – December 31, 2024
|
88
|
|
Table 13.1: Summary of Pillar Dimensions (Remnant Pillar Size)
|
93
|
|
Table 13.2: Boulby Mine Production (2020 to 2025)
|
100
|
|
Table 13.3: Boulby Life of Mine Schedule
|
100
|
|
Table 13.4: Main Mining Fleet
|
101
|
|
Table 13.5: Ancillary Equipment Fleet
|
101
|
|
Table 13.6: Labour for the Underground Mining Operations
|
102
|
|
Table 14.1: Labour for the Processing Operations
|
115
|
|
Table 17.1: Summary of Environmental Permits
|
110
|
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for Boulby Mine
|
118
|
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for Boulby Mine
|
118
|
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for the Boulby Mine
|
119
|
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for the Boulby Mine
|
120
|
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for the Boulby Mine
|
121
|
|
Figure 1.1: Boulby Mine Annual Hoisted Polyhalite Tonnes
|
3
|
|
Figure 3.1: Location of the Boulby Mine, United Kingdom
|
17
|
|
Figure 3.2: Location of the Boulby Mine, Northeast United Kingdom
|
18
|
|
Figure 3.3: Offshore Lease Areas
|
19
|
|
Figure 3.4: Onshore Lease Areas
|
20
|
|
Figure 5.1: Boulby Mine Annual Hoisted Polyhalite Tonnes
|
25
|
|
Figure 6.1: Regional Geology of the Cleveland Basin and Surrounding Area
|
26
|
|
Figure 6.2: Schematic Cross Section Showing Interpretation of Stratigraphic Changes Across the Mine and Lease Area
|
28
|
|
Figure 6.3: Stratigraphic Overview of the Boulby Mine at the Shafts
|
29
|
|
Figure 6.4: Stratigraphy of the Zone 1 Polyhalite Mining Area
|
30
|
|
Figure 6.5: Structural Setting and Location of Polyhalite Zone 1 and Zone 2
|
31
|
|
Figure 6.6: Detailed Stratigraphic Sequence in the Vicinity of the Polyhalite Horizons
|
33
|
|
Figure 6.7: Features of the P1 Polyhalite in a Mine Roadway Section
|
34
|
|
Figure 7.1: Location of Onshore and Offshore 2D Seismic Lines
|
38
|
|
Figure 7.2: Location of Offshore 3D Seismic Survey
|
39
|
|
Figure 7.3: Schematic Cross Section of the LHD Directional Drilling (Red – Parent, Blue – Daughter)
|
40
|
|
Figure 7.4: Location of Polyhalite Exploration Data in Relation to Boulby Mine Workings (shown in red). Data shown is: Longhole Drilling
(blue), Probe Holes (green), Chip Samples (yellow)
|
44
|
|
Figure 7.5: Example Sections of Longhole Exploration Drillholes through Polyhalite
|
44
|
|
Figure 8.1: QC Sample Insertion Template (Prior to July 2023)
|
52
|
|
Figure 8.2: Standard Sample Results – Prior to July 2023
|
56
|
|
Figure 8.3: Standard Sample Results – After July 2023
|
56
|
|
Figure 8.4: Blank Sample Results – Prior to July 2023
|
58
|
|
Figure 8.5: Blank Sample Results – After July 2023
|
58
|
|
Figure 8.6: Relative Difference of Coarse Duplicates - Polyhalite
|
69
|
|
Figure 8.7: Scatter Plot of Coarse Duplicate - Polyhalite
|
59
|
|
Figure 8.8: Relative Difference of Coarse Duplicates - Anhydrite
|
60
|
|
Figure 8.9: Scatter Plot of Coarse Duplicate - Anhydrite
|
60
|
|
Figure 8.10: Relative Difference of Coarse Duplicates - Halite
|
61
|
|
Figure 8.11: Scatter Plot of Coarse Duplicate - Halite
|
61
|
|
Figure 10.1: Comparison of ROM Head Grade and Final Product Grade (% K2O)
|
65
|
|
Figure 10.2: Comparison of ROM Head Grade and Final Product Grade (% Halite)
|
66
|
|
Figure 11.1: Example West-East Section (looking North) of Final Seam Solid Model
|
70
|
|
Figure 11.2: Isometric View (looking Northwest) of Final Seam Solid Model
|
70
|
|
Figure 11.3: Isometric View (looking Northwest) of Location of Three Main Sub-Domains with Respect to Current Mine Workings
|
71
|
|
Figure 11.4: Plan Views of the Spatial Extents of High Grade Polyhalite (red) with Respect to Anhydritic Poly (purple) and Halitic Poly
(green) Domains
|
72
|
|
Figure 11.5: Plan View of Spatial Extent of P2-Polyhalite High Grade (red) Anhydritic (purple) and Halitic (green)
|
73
|
|
Figure 11.6: Plan View of Spatial Extent of Poly-East High Grade (red) and Low Grade (green)
|
73
|
|
Figure 11.7: Example of Top-Cut Assessment for K in P3-Poly-Halitic Subdomain
|
74
|
|
Figure 11.8: Variogram Models for K in P3-Polyhalite
|
75
|
|
Figure 11.9: Example Swath Plots for P3-Polyhalite
|
78
|
|
Figure 11.10: Example Visual Validation of Estimated K grade and Input Drillhole Composite Data
|
79
|
|
Figure 11.11: Summary of Annual Reconciliation
|
80
|
|
Figure 11.12: Summary of K2O Deviation Model vs Product on
Annual Basis
|
80
|
|
Figure 11.13: Summary of K2O Deviation Model vs Chip Sample
on Annual Basis
|
81
|
|
Figure 11.14: Summary of K2O Deviation Model vs Product on
Monthly Basis
|
81
|
|
Figure 11.15: Summary of Tonnage Reconciliation on Annual Basis
|
82
|
|
Figure 11.16: Summary of Tonnage Deviation Block Model vs Product on Annual Basis
|
83
|
|
Figure 11.17: Mineral Resource Classification
|
85
|
|
Figure 11.18: Plan Views of Kriging Efficiency (left) and Kriging Variance (right)
|
85
|
|
Figure 11.19: Plan Views of Number of Drillholes Used in Estimation (left) and Search Pass for Grade Estimation (right)
|
86
|
|
Figure 13.1: Design Criteria for Chain Pillars (Advance)
|
95
|
|
Figure 13.2: Design Criteria for Stubs/Remnant Pillar (Retreat)
|
95
|
|
Figure 13.3: Design Criteria for Barrier/Lateral Pillar following retreat of Production Panel
|
95
|
|
Figure 13.4: Plan View of Existing Layout of the Boulby Mine
|
99
|
|
Figure 14.1: Block Flow Diagram of Polysulphate® Processing Flowsheet
|
103
|
|
Figure 14.2: PotashpluS® Simplified Flowsheet
|
114
|
|
Figure 15.1: Surface Layout of the Boulby Mine
|
106
|
|
Figure 19.1: After-Tax 8% NPV Sensitivity Analysis
|
122
|
| 1 |
| 1.1 |
Property Description
|
| 1.2 |
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
| 1.3 |
History
|

| 1.4 |
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
| 1.5 |
Exploration
|
| 1.6 |
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
| 1.7 |
Data Verification
|
| 1.8 |
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
| 1.9 |
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
|
Table 1.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Boulby Mine – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grade
(% K2O)
|
|
Measured
|
-
|
-
|
|
Indicated
|
39.8
|
13.6
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
39.8
|
13.6
|
|
Inferred
|
11.5
|
13.5
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Boulby and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference of Mineral Resources is on an in-situ basis and are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Boulby.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a cut-off grade of 12.0% K2O equivalent and comprise a 6m
thick horizon.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density of 2.77 g/cm3.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 100%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a two-year average product price of $205/t FOB and an exchange rate of £0.79 per U.S. dollar.
|
| 1.10 |
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
|
Table 1.2: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Boulby Mine – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grade
(% K2O)
|
|
Proven
|
-
|
-
|
|
Probable
|
7.4
|
13.9
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Boulby and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Boulby.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a cut-off grade of 12.0% K2O equivalent.
|
| 7. |
A minimum mining width of 6 m was used.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 100%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a two-year average product price of $205/t FOB and an exchange rate of £0.79 per U.S. dollar.
|
| 1.11 |
Mining Methods
|
| 1.12 |
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
| 1.13 |
Infrastructure
|
| 1.14 |
Market Studies
|
| 1.15 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
| 1.16 |
Capital, Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
| 1.17 |
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
| 1.18 |
Recommendations
|
| 1.18.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Continue the current sampling and analysis methodology for drill core supported by continuation of the current QA/QC sample programme.
|
| • |
Testing of core samples for density and a comparison of estimation for density using these results in the resource model against the current methodology of grade assignation
using a regression equation should be made once sufficient sample results are available.
|
| • |
Testing of retained historic core for density should be carried out. Targeting of historic core from positions in and around mined out production areas would allow mining
reconciliation equations to be refined using actual density results rather than density estimated from regression equations.
|
| • |
As exploration to the east and south of the current resource area continues, bring in these drill results to expand the extents of the current Mineral Resource model to help
guide further exploration drilling and planning.
|
| 1.18.2 |
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
| • |
To date an analysis of production panels shows the overall mining recovery from each panel compared with the planned recovery results in approximately 10 % mining losses. The
QP considers losses from each panel should be continuously reviewed as mining progresses.
|
| 1.18.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
Continue research into new high value fertilizer products.
|
| • |
Investigate the potential for a surface blending facility.
|
| 1.18.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Continue using and improving the environmental management system and maintain its ISO accredited standard.
|
| • |
Continue active engagement with local communities and stakeholders through formal and informal projects and outreach.
|
| • |
ICL Boulby should progress the application with the North York Moors Planning Authority (NYMPA) to extend the import of MOP beyond the current permit of December 31, 2027.
|
| 2 |
| 2.1 |
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
| 2.2 |
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
| 2.3 |
Sources of Information
|
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report.
|
| • |
Documentation for licensing and permitting, published government reports and public information as included in Section 24 (References) of this report and cited in this report.
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report.
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources as listed below.
|
| • |
Mr. Thomas Edwards, Chief Geologist, ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Mr. Dogan Cetinkal, Resource Geologist, ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Mr. Phil Welsh, Production, ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Mr Craig Szekeres, Operations Manager (Mining), ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Mr Alexander Garcia-Gonzales, Geotechnical Engineer, ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Mr Craig Lawton, Infrastructure Manager, ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Mr Balaji Vasudevan, Senior Process Engineer, ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Ms. Zoe Goodchild, Environmental, ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Ms. Donna Bennison, Project Development Manager, ICL Boulby.
|
| • |
Mr. Craig Hardaker, Financial, ICL Boulby.
|
| 2.4 |
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
| 2.5 |
Forward-Looking Statements
|
| 2.6 |
Units and Abbreviations
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
°C
|
Degrees Celsius
|
|
2D
|
Two-dimensional
|
|
3D
|
Three-dimensional
|
|
AA
|
Atomic Absorption
|
|
AAS
|
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
|
|
AGI
|
American Geologic Institute
|
|
AI
|
Acid Insoluble assays
|
|
Al2O3
|
Aluminium Oxide
|
|
BAT
|
Best Available Technology or Best Available Techniques
|
|
bhp
|
Brake Horse Power
|
|
BOT
|
Build-Operate-Transfer
|
|
Ca2+
|
Calcium ions
|
|
CaCl2
|
Calcium chloride
|
|
CaO
|
Calcium Oxide
|
|
Cd
|
Cadmium
|
|
CEMS
|
Constant Emissions Monitoring Systems
|
|
CO2
|
Carbon dioxide
|
|
COG
|
Cut-off Grade
|
|
CORS
|
Continuously Operating Reference Station
|
|
CRM
|
Certified Reference Materials
|
|
Datamine
|
3D geological modelling, mine design and production planning software
|
|
EA
|
Environmental Assessment
|
|
EDA
|
Exploratory data analysis
|
|
EHS&S
|
Environment, Health, Safety and Sustainability
|
|
EIA
|
Environmental Impact Assessment
|
|
EIS
|
Environmental Impact Statement
|
|
EMS
|
Environmental Management System
|
|
EPR
|
Environmental Permitting Regulations
|
|
ESG
|
Economic and environmental, Social, Governance
|
|
ESIA
|
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
|
|
F
|
Florine
|
|
Fe
|
Iron
|
|
Fe2O3
|
Iron Oxide or ferric oxide
|
|
FOB
|
Free on Board / Freight on Board
|
|
FS
|
Feasibility Study
|
|
GHG
|
Greenhouse Gas
|
|
GIS
|
Geographical Information Services
|
|
GPS
|
Global Positioning System
|
|
GRI
|
Global Reporting Initiative
|
|
GWh
|
Gigawatt hour
|
|
H&S
|
Health and Safety
|
|
Ha
|
Hectare (10,000m2)
|
|
HFO
|
Heavy Fuel Oil
|
|
HQ
|
63.5 mm diameter drill core
|
|
hr
|
Hour/s
|
|
ICL
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
ICMM
|
International Council on Mining and Metals
|
|
ID
|
Identification (number or reference)
|
|
IPPC
|
Integrated Pollution Prevention Control
|
|
K
|
Potassium
|
|
K2O
|
Potassium oxide
|
| Acronym / Abbreviation | Definition |
|
kV
|
Kilovolt
|
|
kW
|
Kilowatt
|
|
kWh
|
Kilowatt hour
|
|
kWh/t
|
Kilowatt hour per tonne
|
|
LFO
|
Light Fuel Oil
|
|
LIMS
|
Laboratory Information Management System
|
|
LOM
|
Life of Mine
|
|
LTA
|
Lost Time Analysis
|
|
M
|
Million(s)
|
|
Ma
|
Million years ago
|
|
MAPGIS
|
GIS Mapping Software
|
|
mbsl
|
Metres below sea level
|
|
MgCl2
|
Magnesium chloride
|
|
MgO
|
Magnesium Oxide
|
|
MOP
|
Muriate of potash
|
|
MRMR
|
Mining Rock Mass Rating
|
|
Mtpa
|
Million tonnes per annum
|
|
MW
|
Megawatt
|
|
MWh
|
Megawatt hour
|
|
NaCl
|
Sodium Chloride (salt)
|
|
NQ
|
47.6 mm diameter drill core
|
|
OEE
|
Overall Equipment Effectiveness
|
|
P2O5
|
Phosphorus pentoxide
|
|
Pa
|
Pascal (measurement of vacuum gas pressure)
|
|
PFS
|
Prefeasibility Study
|
|
ppm
|
parts per million
|
|
QA/QC
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
|
QMS
|
Quality Management System
|
|
QP
|
Qualified Person
|
|
RMR
|
Rock Mass Rating
|
|
ROM
|
Run of Mine
|
|
rpm
|
revolutions per minute
|
|
SEC
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
SiO2
|
Silicon Dioxide
|
|
SLR
|
SLR Consulting Limited
|
|
SRM
|
Standard Reference Materials
|
|
t
|
Tonne metric unit of mass (1,000kg or 2,204.6 lb)
|
|
t/a or tpa
|
Tonnes per annum
|
|
t/d or tpd
|
Tonnes per day
|
|
t/h or tph
|
Tonnes per hour
|
|
TRS
|
(S-K 1300) Technical Report Summary
|
|
UTM
|
Universal Transverse Mercator
|
|
WAI
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
|
XRD
|
X-ray powder Diffraction
|
|
XRF
|
X-ray powder Fluorescence
|
| 3 |


| 3.1 |
Tenure
|


| 3.2 |
Agreements
|
| 3.3 |
Royalties and Rents
|
| 3.4 |
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
| 4 |
| 4.1 |
Accessibility
|
| 4.2 |
Climate
|
| 4.3 |
Local Resources
|
| 4.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
Boulby underground (room and pillar) mine including shafts and vent shafts;
|
| • |
Mineral processing plant including crushing and screening;
|
| • |
Site offices, laboratory, stores and maintenance workshops;
|
| • |
Surface drains, catch ponds and catch pit (interceptor pit);
|
| • |
Effluent tunnel and pipeline for site dewatering;
|
| • |
Rail load out and rail line;
|
| • |
Port facilities at Teesport.
|
| • |
Power consisting of electrical power and natural gas with connection to the UK national grid.
|
| • |
Water sourced from a combination of national grid supplied fresh water from utility suppliers, sea water and brine from mine dewatering which is pumped to storage areas in the
mine workings.
|
| • |
No tailings storage facility is required by the operation.
|
| • |
Surface stockpiles consisting of ore and final product.
|
| • |
Waste dumps.
|
| 4.5 |
Physiography
|
| 5 |
| 5.1 |
Ownership, Development and Exploration History
|
| 5.2 |
Production History
|

| 6 |
| 6.1 |
Regional Geology
|

| • |
Pre-Permian Basement, this sequence is not exposed or dealt with directly within the mine workings or exploration. The upper contact of the Carboniferous is a major and
well-studied regional unconformity that can be seen on seismic data across the mine site and is associated with Variscan uplift.
|
| • |
The Permian age Zechstein Group overlies this basement material and includes four major cycles of carbonate-evaporite sequences. The Zechstein deposits outcrop for some 230 km
to the north towards the River Tyne and dip gently to the east. The thickness of the Zechstein strata ranges from 580 m onshore within the lease boundaries and increasing up to 1,200 m offshore eastwards beneath the North Sea. This
package consists predominantly of evaporitic chlorides, carbonates and sulphate rocks (halite, anhydrite, dolomite, potash and polyhalite) while subordinate occurrences of siltstones and mudstones also occur within this package.
|
| • |
Above the Zechstein strata lies a significant package of Mesozoic sediments. These consist of sandstones, mudstones, siltstone, shales with lesser dolomitic intervals. Units to
note are the Sherwood Sandstone with a thickness of approximately 270 m and constitutes a major regional scale aquifer.
|
| • |
The surface stratigraphy is dominated by a thin capping of Cenozoic glacial till. This material is present across the mine site and its thickness varies dramatically with the
surface topography of the area.
|
| • |
Pre-Zechstein: Prior to the late Carboniferous (circa 650 Ma) a significant number of major deformation events affected the region and included the Cadomain, Acadian,
Caledonian and Variscan orogenies. The impact of these events was the development of a number of major structural trends covering a range of orientations. These trends do not directly impact the Zechstein strata and the polyhalite
mineralisation, however, the resultant structures and faulting result in weak zones that show signs of reactivation during Mesozoic and Tertiary and act to partially control and localise deformation during these periods.
|
| • |
Syn-Zechstein: The Zechstein sequence is typically described as increasing in depth within the southern North Sea area, however, within this context there is no published data
suggesting active faulting during the deposition of the Zechstein strata in this region. However, in the Central Graben area (further to the northeast) there is evidence of significant fault related extension during the Permian period.
|
| • |
Post-Zechstein: The Mesozoic and Tertiary eras represent a structurally significant time for the stratigraphy within the Boulby mine. Significant east-west extension occurred
from the late Permian through to the early Cretaceous resulting in the formation of the North Sea Basin. Along the southern margins of the larger central North Sea grabens (Viking and Central) numerous sub-basins were formed and
separated by local topographic highs. Several of these are orientated obliquely to the regional extension direction which is inferred to result from local trans-tensional deformation due to re-activation of pre-Permian structures. During
the late Cretaceous and early to mid-Tertiary, the tectonic regime in the North Sea became contractional resulting in the reactivation of some Mesozioc normal faults as reverse faults.
|
| 6.2 |
Local and Property Geology
|
| • |
Z1 (the Don Group)
|
| • |
Z2 (the Aislaby Group)
|
| • |
Z3 (the Teesside Group) and
|
| • |
Z4 (the Staintondale Group)
|




| 6.2.1 |
Faulting
|
| 6.3 |
Mineralisation
|

| 6.3.1 |
P1 Polyhalite
|

| 6.3.2 |
P1 Halite
|
| 6.3.3 |
P2 Polyhalite
|
| 6.3.4 |
P3 Polyhalite
|
| 6.4 |
Deposit Type
|
| 7 |
| 7.1 |
Seismic Surveys
|
| 7.1.1 |
2D Seismic Survey
|

| 7.1.2 |
3D Seismic Survey
|

| 7.2 |
Drilling
|
| • |
Initial vertical exploration holes drilled from potash workings above the polyhalite;
|
| • |
Sub-horizontal, longhole directional drilling known as longhole drilling (LHD); and
|
| • |
Grade control face drilling.
|
| 7.2.1 |
Longhole Drilling
|

| 7.2.2 |
Drill Core Diameter
|
| 7.2.3 |
Core Return, Collection and Order
|
| 7.2.4 |
Core Recovery
|
| 7.2.5 |
Hole Positioning
|
| 7.2.6 |
Downhole Surveys
|
| 7.2.7 |
Adequacy of the Location of Data Points
|
| 7.2.8 |
LHD Logging Procedures
|
| 7.2.9 |
LHD Sampling Procedures
|
| 7.2.10 |
Effects of Crystallisation of Drilling Brine on Drill Core
|
|
Table 7.1: Test Results for Assessing for Potential Brine Contamination of Samples
|
||||
|
Sample Description
|
w/w %
|
|||
|
NaCl
|
KCL
|
Ca
|
Mg
|
|
|
Saturated Brine (Control sample)
|
23.04
|
3.17
|
0.04
|
0.51
|
|
Test 1
|
ND
|
ND
|
0
|
0.14
|
|
Test 2
|
ND
|
ND
|
0
|
0.15
|
|
Test 3
|
ND
|
ND
|
0
|
0.15
|
|
Uncontaminated Distilled Water
|
ND
|
ND
|
0
|
0.15
|
| 7.2.11 |
Drill Plans and Sections
|


|
Table 7.2: Summary of Drillholes Used in Mineral Resource Estimation (LHD Drilling)
|
|||||||
|
BHID
|
First Deflection Collar Easting (m)
|
First Deflection Collar Northing (m)
|
First Deflection Collar Elevation (m)
|
Start Bearing (Degrees)
|
Start Dip (Degrees)
|
Total
Number of Deflections
|
Number of Polyhalite Intersections
|
|
P001
|
478,179
|
523,503
|
833
|
270
|
0
|
13
|
7
|
|
P003
|
478,180
|
523,505
|
833
|
290
|
2
|
9
|
2
|
|
P006
|
478,183
|
523,508
|
833
|
318
|
0
|
17
|
5
|
|
P007
|
478,185
|
523,509
|
833
|
330
|
-1
|
16
|
5
|
|
P008
|
478,187
|
523,509
|
833
|
340
|
0
|
15
|
5
|
|
P009
|
478,188
|
523,509
|
833
|
350
|
0
|
18
|
5
|
|
P010
|
478,190
|
523,509
|
833
|
359
|
-1
|
19
|
7
|
|
P011
|
478,191
|
523,509
|
833
|
10
|
1
|
17
|
5
|
|
P012
|
478,193
|
523,509
|
833
|
26
|
-1
|
17
|
6
|
|
P014
|
478,195
|
523,508
|
833
|
45
|
-2
|
14
|
5
|
|
P017
|
478,197
|
523,505
|
833
|
77
|
-2
|
17
|
7
|
|
P019
|
478,199
|
523,503
|
832
|
88
|
-3
|
15
|
2
|
|
P021
|
478,292
|
523,257
|
810
|
80
|
0
|
4
|
2
|
|
P027
|
478,291
|
523,255
|
810
|
95
|
0
|
21
|
9
|
|
P028
|
478,552
|
523,191
|
797
|
100
|
0
|
23
|
9
|
|
P029
|
478,552
|
523,189
|
797
|
115
|
0
|
26
|
4
|
|
P030
|
478,552
|
523,189
|
797
|
115
|
0
|
9
|
6
|
|
P032
|
478,549
|
523,187
|
797
|
125
|
0
|
16
|
8
|
|
P034
|
478,548
|
523,186
|
798
|
135
|
-2
|
14
|
5
|
|
P036
|
478,533
|
523,189
|
797
|
230
|
0
|
5
|
3
|
|
P037
|
478,544
|
523,184
|
797
|
169
|
-1
|
22
|
10
|
|
P040
|
478,546
|
523,185
|
797
|
151
|
1
|
14
|
10
|
|
P041
|
478,547
|
523,186
|
797
|
143
|
1
|
22
|
1
|
|
P042
|
478,547
|
523,186
|
797
|
143
|
1
|
16
|
10
|
|
P052
|
478,867
|
523,315
|
791
|
340
|
2
|
14
|
11
|
|
P054
|
478,870
|
523,316
|
791
|
350
|
0
|
13
|
9
|
|
P056
|
478,871
|
523,316
|
791
|
358
|
0
|
10
|
7
|
|
P058
|
478,872
|
523,316
|
791
|
10
|
0
|
11
|
7
|
|
Table 7.2: Summary of Drillholes Used in Mineral Resource Estimation (LHD Drilling)
|
|||||||
|
BHID
|
First Deflection Collar Easting (m)
|
First Deflection Collar Northing (m)
|
First Deflection Collar Elevation (m)
|
Start Bearing (Degrees)
|
Start Dip (Degrees)
|
Total
Number of Deflections
|
Number of Polyhalite Intersections
|
|
P062
|
478,876
|
523,315
|
791
|
30
|
0
|
11
|
7
|
|
P066
|
478,879
|
523,312
|
790
|
47
|
2
|
13
|
8
|
|
P068
|
478,880
|
523,311
|
790
|
57
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
|
P070
|
478,881
|
523,310
|
790
|
65
|
1
|
24
|
11
|
|
P072
|
478,874
|
523,315
|
791
|
21
|
0
|
14
|
6
|
|
P074
|
478,038
|
524,235
|
823
|
194
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
|
P080
|
478,033
|
524,235
|
823
|
220
|
0
|
5
|
3
|
|
P084
|
478,030
|
524,238
|
823
|
240
|
0
|
9
|
4
|
|
P086
|
478,029
|
524,240
|
823
|
252
|
-1
|
7
|
6
|
|
P088
|
478,029
|
524,241
|
823
|
259
|
1
|
10
|
5
|
|
P090
|
478,029
|
524,243
|
823
|
270
|
3
|
8
|
3
|
|
P092
|
478,029
|
524,245
|
823
|
278
|
3
|
7
|
4
|
|
P094
|
478,030
|
524,247
|
823
|
290
|
2
|
9
|
5
|
|
P096
|
478,030
|
524,249
|
823
|
300
|
4
|
11
|
7
|
|
P097
|
478,032
|
524,251
|
823
|
310
|
0
|
6
|
1
|
|
P098
|
478,032
|
524,251
|
823
|
310
|
0
|
8
|
7
|
|
P100
|
478,033
|
524,253
|
823
|
320
|
1
|
9
|
4
|
|
P104
|
478,037
|
524,254
|
823
|
340
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
|
P106
|
478,039
|
524,255
|
823
|
350
|
0
|
6
|
3
|
|
P119
|
478,918
|
522,395
|
795
|
70
|
1
|
9
|
1
|
|
P120
|
478,918
|
522,395
|
795
|
70
|
0
|
11
|
8
|
|
P122
|
478,918
|
522,394
|
795
|
79
|
2
|
8
|
5
|
|
P123
|
478,918
|
522,392
|
796
|
90
|
4
|
12
|
1
|
|
P124
|
478,918
|
522,392
|
796
|
90
|
4
|
13
|
8
|
|
P126
|
478,919
|
522,391
|
796
|
98
|
2
|
7
|
5
|
|
P128
|
478,919
|
522,389
|
796
|
109
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
|
P134
|
478,914
|
522,382
|
795
|
171
|
-1
|
10
|
3
|
| 7.3 |
QP Opinion
|
| 8 |
| 8.1 |
Sample Preparation
|
| • |
Primary sample preparation (size and mass reduction of full core samples).
|
| • |
Sealed bags of core are brought to surface and supplied to the core preparation area.
|
| • |
The core sample ID ticket is removed from the bag and checked against the expected ID number.
|
| • |
The sample is allowed to dry in a dedicated storage container.
|
| • |
The crushing and splitting equipment (Rocklabs Mid-Boyd RSD Dual split (RSD)) are cleaned to remove any remnants of previous samples, including the jaws, vibratory feeder tray
and splitting equipment (RSD cone, chute and sample & reject collection drawers).
|
| • |
The whole core sample is fed through the crusher for size reduction to target 80 % passing 2 mm.
|
| • |
The sample material is continuously split via a cone shaped rotary sample divider to a pre-selected amount (typically 10 %).
|
| • |
For a typical core sample, approximately 1.2 - 1.6 kg of material flows to the sample drawer and the rest to the reject bin.
|
| • |
For samples where a duplicate is required, a second sample drawer can be inserted into the RSD unit, thus diverting a duplicate split mass to this drawer rather than the reject
bin.
|
| • |
A check on final size is performed during the processing of each batch of core with use of a 10 mm aperture test sieve. The sample portion is added to the sieve and shaken
through into a collection pan below. The amount retained above 10 mm is recorded. If a sample has more than 5 % retained above 10 mm, investigation into crushing efficiency and settings is carried out before preparation work continues.
|
| • |
The breaking jaws, cheek plates and vibratory feeder tray are brushed if necessary and then the unit restarted to remove any remaining dust into the sample utilising the RSD to
ensure this is split in the same manner as the sample.
|
| • |
The sample is removed from the unit and poured into a labelled sample bag containing a ‘ticket’ with the batch number and sample number before being transferred to a larger
labelled container with the rest of the samples from the batch.
|
| • |
The reject material is removed from the unit and poured into a labelled large heavy-duty bag and sealed with a plastic cable tie.
|
| • |
The crusher/splitter unit is then cleaned to remove any remnants of the sample, including vacuuming of the RSD cone and feeder tray.
|
| • |
Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) samples are introduced at this stage at an insertion rate determined via the batch record sheet. Generally, each batch will contain
a blank, standard and set of duplicate samples.
|
| • |
Geology duplicate: The duplicate is inserted as above to obtain two samples and reject.
|
| • |
Geology blank: 500 g of dried, high purity quartzite is fed through the crusher/splitter unit, the sample and reject material recombined and then bagged directly.
|
| • |
Geology standard: A bag of pre-crushed, batch made ‘ND01’ high purity polyhalite is included with batches.
|
| • |
Complete batches are then sealed and labelled with the date of preparation.
|
| • |
At the start of the batch, the sample bags are laid out and checked for any defects or obvious contamination.
|
| • |
Each sample is then split via a tabletop 1:2 riffle splitter to 100 g (±10 g) and poured into a clean paper drying tray contained within an oven tray.
|
| • |
The laboratory QA/QC samples are introduced during this preparation stage at a standard insertion rate of 1 of each type per batch:
|
| • |
Laboratory duplicate: The sample is split to 200 g (±10 g). The sub-sample is then passed through the riffle splitter once more to obtain two duplicate 100 g samples.
|
| • |
Laboratory blank: 100 g of dried, pre-crushed high purity quartzite is weighed and poured into a clean paper drying tray contained within an oven tray.
|
| • |
Laboratory standard: A pre-prepared bag of laboratory standard ‘S1’ is included within each batch (wet chemistry testing only).
|
| • |
The samples are dried at 120°C for 30 minutes.
|
| • |
The samples are pulverised on a Herzog HSM250 vibratory disc mill for 45 seconds at 1,200 rpm with the addition of a few drops of isopropanol to prevent sticking to the
grinding tools, to obtain powder samples of analytical fineness.
|
| • |
Samples are transferred to labelled bags and sealed within a large bag containing the rest of the batch. The date of preparation is written on the bag.
|
| • |
A check on final size is performed during the pulverisation of each batch of core to ensure grinding efficiency by use of a test sieve. The whole pulverised sample is poured
into a 200 µm test sieve with collection pan attached. The sieve stack is then shaken on a Retsch AS200 control sieve shaker to aid separation. Any remaining sample is brushed through the sieve. The percentage by mass retained above 200
µm is recorded. If the sample has more than 1 % retained above 200 µm, investigation into milling efficiency is carried out before preparation work continues.
|
| 8.2 |
Analysis Method
|
| • |
From the 100 g sample, a clean sample scoop is used to fill a 40 mm aluminium pellet cup.
|
| • |
This is then pressed into a pellet using a Hertzog HTP40 automatic pellet press with a press force of 40 kN.
|
| • |
The pellet is then inserted into a pellet holder and placed in a numbered position on the XRD tray autosampler unit.
|
| • |
Samples are then scanned to capture a diffractogram of the sample.
|
| • |
Each complete diffraction experiment is automatically processed by RoboRiet software using an internally developed template for phase fraction quantification by Rietveld
refinement.
|
| • |
Results of mineral percentage by mass are exported automatically to an Excel workbook and the raw scan data saved and archived as XRDML files.
|
| • |
Mineral percentages by mass then undergo a correction based on a calibration derived from samples that have been analysed by ion chromatography.
|
| • |
Results of QA/QC samples are checked by ICL Boulby against pre-determined tolerances. The results are also checked for any obvious errors.
|
| • |
Any QA/QC samples that fall outside the pre-determined tolerances make the whole batch liable for re-testing or re-preparation depending on the nature of the failure,
flowcharts are in place for exact steps to follow for various types of QA/QC failure.
|
| • |
Pending any re-tests, final results are uploaded onto an internal, online database platform for storage and transfer to the geology department.
|
| • |
Batches are selected at random, and all samples from the selected batch tested.
|
| • |
A 1 g sub-sample is taken.
|
| • |
The sub-sample is added to a clean 600 ml beaker and 400 ml of deionised water are added, with swirling to prevent caking.
|
| • |
The beaker is then placed on a hotplate and boiled for 30 minutes.
|
| • |
The beaker is then cooled and the contents transferred to a 500 ml volumetric flask and deionised water is added.
|
| • |
Analysis for Na and K is undertaken by flame photometry
|
| • |
A full suite of elements (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Cl, SO4) can be analysed via ion chromatography if
required.
|
| 8.3 |
Sample Security
|
| 8.4 |
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
|
| 8.4.1 |
Introduction
|
| 8.4.2 |
Internal Laboratory Controls
|
|
Table 8.1: Control Data May 2018 – December 2020
|
||||||
|
Element
|
Theoretical
Value (%)
|
Ave. Lab
Result (%)
|
Above Instrument Error
|
Below Instrument Error
|
||
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
|||
|
K
|
12.00
|
12.00
|
1
|
0.02%
|
2
|
0.05%
|
|
Na
|
3.00
|
3.14
|
16
|
0.4%
|
0
|
0.0%
|
|
Ca
|
11.65
|
11.71
|
224
|
5.1%
|
1
|
0.02%
|
|
Mg
|
4.93
|
4.86
|
87
|
2.0%
|
308
|
7.1%
|
|
Cl
|
90.00
|
89.65
|
0
|
0.0%
|
5
|
0.2%
|
|
Element
|
Theoretical Value (%)
|
Analytical
Error
|
Absolute
Error (%)
|
Upper
Limit (%)
|
Lower
Limit (%)
|
|
|
K
|
12.00
|
2.0%
|
0.24
|
12.24
|
11.76
|
|
|
Na
|
3.00
|
0.2
|
0.20
|
3.20
|
2.80
|
|
|
Ca
|
11.65
|
2.0%
|
0.23
|
11.88
|
11.42
|
|
|
Mg
|
4.93
|
2.0%
|
0.10
|
5.03
|
4.83
|
|
|
Cl
|
90.00
|
2.0%
|
1.80
|
91.80
|
88.20
|
|
| 8.4.3 |
QA/QC
|

| • |
Standard QC sample control limits were set based on its mean ±2 standard deviations;
|
| • |
Blank QC sample control limits were set based on ±5 % tolerance limits. A pure quartz sample was used as blank sample; and
|
| • |
Control limits of duplicate samples were set based on the grade of the primary mineral in the sample. The mineral that comprises more than 80 % of a sample is
considered as the primary mineral in the sample, and ±4 % relative difference control limits were applied only to those primary mineral samples.
|
|
Table 8.2: Standard and Blank Control Limits Prior to July 2023
|
|||||
|
Sample Type
|
Mineral
|
Mean (%)
|
STD (%)
|
Lower Control Limit (%)
|
Upper Control Limit (%)
|
|
Standard
|
Polyhalite
|
98.47
|
0.39
|
97.69
|
99.25
|
|
Halite
|
0.30
|
0.15
|
0.00
|
0.60
|
|
|
Anhydrite
|
0.95
|
0.37
|
0.20
|
1.70
|
|
|
Quartz
|
-
|
-
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
|
Blank
|
Polyhalite
|
-
|
-
|
0.00
|
5.00
|
|
Halite
|
-
|
-
|
0.00
|
5.00
|
|
|
Anhydrite
|
-
|
-
|
0.00
|
5.00
|
|
|
Quartz
|
100.00
|
-
|
95.00
|
100.00
|
|
|
Table 8.3: Duplicate Sample Control Limits Prior to July 2023
|
||||
|
Sample Type
|
Mineral
|
Grade (%)
|
Lower Control Limits
|
Upper Control Limits
|
|
Duplicate
|
Polyhalite, Halite & Anhydrite
|
>80
|
-4% Relative Difference Ratio
|
+4% Relative Difference Ratio
|
|
<80
|
Ignored
|
Ignored
|
||
| • |
Standard QC sample control limits were re-defined to improve the accuracy based on the significantly increased number of standard sample results in the database. New control
limits were set to mean ±1, ±2, ±3 standard deviations. Mean ±3 STD limit was used as the “hard-limit” for accept/reject decisions of the batches, whereas mean ±1, ±2 STD limits were also set to identify any systematic error trends and
potential continuous biases.
|
| • |
Blank QC sample control limits were set based on mean ±1, ±2, ±3 standard deviations calculated based on all the available blank sample analysis results. High purity quartz
sample is used for blank samples. As with the standard sample limits, the mean -3 STD limit was set as the “hard-limit”, whereas mean ±1, ±2 STD limits have been set to identify systematic/continuous errors.
|
|
Table 8.4: Standard and Blank Control Limits Prior After July 2023
|
|||||||||
|
Sample Type
|
Mineral
|
Mean (%)
|
STD
|
Lower Control Limits (%)
|
Upper Control Limits (%)
|
||||
|
-1STD
|
-2STD
|
-3STD
|
+1STD
|
+2STD
|
+3STD
|
||||
|
Standard
|
Polyhalite
|
98.38
|
0.29
|
98.09
|
97.80
|
97.51
|
98.67
|
98.96
|
99.26
|
|
Halite
|
0.01
|
0.07
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.08
|
0.15
|
0.21
|
|
|
Anhydrite
|
0.91
|
0.37
|
0.54
|
0.17
|
0.00
|
1.27
|
1.64
|
2.01
|
|
|
Quartz
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|||
|
Blank
|
Polyhalite
|
0.81
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
1.54
|
2.35
|
3.16
|
|
|
Halite
|
0.20
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.25
|
0.46
|
0.66
|
||
|
Anhydrite
|
0.45
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.77
|
1.22
|
1.66
|
||
|
Quartz
|
100.00
|
1.01
|
97.87
|
96.86
|
95.84
|
99.90
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
|
|
Table 8.5: Nelson Rules for Detecting Systematic Errors of Bias
|
|
|
Nelson Rules
|
Description
|
|
Rule 1
|
One point is more than 3 standard deviations from the mean
|
|
Rule 2
|
Nine (or more) points in a row are on the same side of the mean
|
|
Rule 3
|
Six (or more) points in a row are continually increasing (or decreasing)
|
|
Rule 4
|
Fourteen (or more) points in a row alternate in direction, increasing then decreasing
|
|
Rule 5
|
Two (or three) out of three points in a row are more than 2 standard deviations from the mean in the same direction
|
|
Rule 6
|
Four (or five) out of five points in a row are more than 1 standard deviation from the mean in the same direction
|
|
Rule 7
|
Fifteen points in a row are all within 1 standard deviation of the mean on either side of the mean
|
|
Rule 8
|
Eight points in a row exist with none within 1 standard deviation of the mean and the points are in both directions from the mean
|
|
Table 8.6: Duplicate Sample Control Limits After July 2023
|
||||
|
Sample Type
|
Mineral
|
Grade (%)
|
Lower Control Limits
|
Upper Control Limits
|
|
Duplicate
|
Polyhalite, Halite & Anhydrite
|
>80
|
-5% Relative Difference Ratio
|
+5% Relative Difference Ratio
|
|
50-80
|
-10% Relative Difference Ratio
|
+10% Relative Difference Ratio
|
||
|
20-50
|
-20% Relative Difference Ratio
|
+20% Relative Difference Ratio
|
||
|
0-20
|
Ignored
|
Ignored
|
||










| 8.5 |
QP Opinion
|
| 9 |
| 9.1 |
Site Visits
|
| 9.2 |
Drillhole Database
|
| • |
Collar files:
|
| o |
Collar coordinates were checked to validate their positions against existing borehole traces drawn in AutoCAD using custom planning and plotting scripts.
|
| o |
End of hole depths were checked.
|
| o |
Provisional collars, and collars of the holes that have no assay and logging data were deleted.
|
| • |
Survey files:
|
| o |
Surveys of the holes that had no assays and logging data were deleted.
|
| o |
Checks were made that there were no downhole surveys beyond the total hole depths.
|
| o |
Surveys exceeding allowed deviation limits were checked then fixed, deleted or kept as they were, based on individual assessment.
|
| o |
Checks were made for any negative azimuth or depth values.
|
| • |
Assay files:
|
| o |
Overlapping intervals were checked.
|
| o |
Lithology/assay consistencies were checked.
|
| o |
Checks were made that no assays were out of the limits of 0 – 100 %.
|
| o |
Checks that “From”-”To” values were correct and in the correct order.
|
| o |
Checks were made that no missing or zero-length intervals were present.
|
| o |
Mineral grades of 0 % were replaced with a value of 0.5 % (precision level of QXRD).
|
| o |
Elemental grades of 0 % were replaced with a value of 0.01 %.
|
| o |
Duplicated records were removed.
|
| • |
Lithology files:
|
| o |
Overlapping intervals were checked.
|
| o |
Consistencies of lithology coding and occurrence of any typo were checked.
|
| o |
Checks that “From”-”To” values were correct and in the correct order.
|
| o |
Checks were made that no missing or zero-length intervals were present.
|
| • |
Verification that collar coordinates coincide with underground workings.
|
| • |
Ensuring each drillhole collar recorded has valid XYZ coordinates.
|
| • |
Ensuring collar coordinates are inside expected limits.
|
| • |
Ensuring collar coordinates are reported to an expected accuracy.
|
| • |
Checking for the presence of any duplicate drillhole collar IDs or collars with duplicate collar coordinates.
|
| • |
Ensuring all holes have valid downhole surveys or at least a recorded start bearing and dip.
|
| • |
Verification that downhole survey azimuth and inclination values display consistency.
|
| • |
Ensuring all downhole survey bearing and dip records were within expected limits.
|
| • |
Checking for the presence of any unusually large changes in dip and/or bearing in downhole survey records that may indicate the presence of typographic errors.
|
| • |
Check for overlapping sample intervals.
|
| • |
Check for duplicate sample intervals.
|
| • |
Identify sample intervals for which grade has been recorded that have excessive length which may indicate composite samples or typographic errors.
|
| • |
Assessing for inconsistencies in spelling or coding (typographic and case sensitive errors) of BHID, hole type, lithology etc. to ensure consistency in data review.
|
| 9.3 |
QP Opinion
|
| 10 |
MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING
|
| 10.1 |
Feed Grade and Final Product Grade Relationship
|


| 11 |
| 11.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Boulby Mine – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grade
(% K2O)
|
|
Measured
|
-
|
-
|
|
Indicated
|
39.8
|
13.6
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
39.8
|
13.6
|
|
Inferred
|
11.5
|
13.5
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Boulby and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference of Mineral Resources is on an in-situ basis and are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Boulby.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a cut-off grade of 12.0% K2O equivalent and comprise a 6m
thick horizon.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density of 2.77 g/cm3.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 100%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a two-year average product price of $205/t FOB and an exchange rate of £0.79 per U.S. dollar.
|
| 11.2 |
Database
|
| 11.3 |
Domaining
|
|
Table 11.2: Seams Modelled
|
||
|
Brotherton Dolomite
|
P1-Polyhalite
|
Poly South
|
|
Z2-Anhydrite
|
P2-Polyhalite
|
Poly East
|
|
Z2-Halite
|
P3-Polyhalite
|
FW-Anhydrite
|
|
P1-Anhydrite (Mid-Seam)
|
P3-Glauberite (Mid-Seam)
|
Kirkham Formation
|


| • |
Main-Polyhlite: The main polyhalite seam has been mined since commencement of polyhalite operations. The characteristics, depositional sequence and nature of deposition of this
are well understood.
|
| • |
Poly-East: Shares common characteristics with the main P2- and P3-Polyhalite but is overlain by anhydrite rather than the P1_Polyhalite. K grades also show higher variability
than the Main Polyhalite.
|
| • |
Poly-South: The extents of this domain remain open and has been intersected by only a few deflections of a single longhole. This shows similar properties with the Main P3 and
Poly-East domains with higher K variability than both albeit from a smaller data set.
|

| • |
Halitic P3-Poly: Generally located near the upper levels of the P3-Polyhalite and defined where polyhalite:halite ratio is ≤15.
|
| • |
Anhydritic P3-Poly: Generally located near the lower levels of the P3-Polyhalite and defined where the polyhalite:anhydrite ratio is ≤11.
|
| • |
HGrade P3-Poly: The high grade polyhalite domain where dilution by halite and anhydrite is minimal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
| • |
Halitic P2-Poly: Defined where polyhalite:halite ratio is ≤4.
|
| • |
Anhydritic P2-Poly: Defined where the polyhalite:anhydrite ratio is ≤4.
|
| • |
HGrade P2-Poly: The high-grade polyhalite domain where dilution by halite and anhydrite is minimal.
|


| • |
P3-Polyhalite Domain:
|
| o |
P3-Poly-HGrade
|
| o |
P3-Poly-Anhydritic
|
| o |
P3-Poly-Halitic
|
| • |
P2-Polyhalite Domain:
|
| o |
P2-Poly-HGrade
|
| o |
P2-Poly-Anhydritic
|
| o |
P2-Poly-Halitic
|
| • |
Poly-East Domain:
|
| o |
Poly-East-HGrade
|
| o |
Poly-East-LGrade
|
| 11.4 |
Geostatistics
|

| • |
P3-Poly-HGrade to P3-Poly-Halitic
|
| • |
P3-Poly-Anhydritc to P2-HGrade
|
| • |
P3-Poly-Halitic to P2-HGrade
|
| • |
P2-Anhydritic to P2 Halitic
|

| 11.5 |
Block Model
|
| 11.6 |
Density
|
| 11.7 |
Grade Estimation, Validation and Reconciliation
|
|
Table 11.3: Search Parameters for Grade Estimation
|
||||||||
|
Domain
|
Radius
|
Factor 1
|
Factor 2
|
Factor 3
|
Sector Strategy
|
Max Samp per Sector
|
Min Samp (total)
|
Min Holes
|
|
P3 Poly
|
||||||||
|
Run 1
|
310
|
1
|
0.50
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
6
|
2
|
|
Run 2
|
460
|
1
|
0.50
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
6
|
2
|
|
Run 3
|
920
|
1
|
0.50
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
|
P2 Poly
|
||||||||
|
Run 1
|
250
|
1
|
0.92
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
6
|
2
|
|
Run 2
|
500
|
1
|
0.92
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
6
|
2
|
|
Run 3
|
1000
|
1
|
0.92
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
|
Poly East
|
||||||||
|
Run 1
|
200
|
1
|
0.90
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
|
Run 2
|
450
|
1
|
0.90
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
|
Run 3
|
900
|
1
|
0.90
|
0.02
|
Quadrants
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
|
Table 11.4: Comparison of K in Input Sample Data and Estimated Blocks by Domain
|
|||||
|
Domain
|
Element
|
Sample
Mean
|
Block
Mean |
Absolute
Difference |
% Absolute
Difference |
|
P2 Anhydritic
|
K
|
4.8
|
5.3
|
0.5
|
10.4
|
|
P2 HGrade
|
K
|
10.9
|
10.9
|
0
|
0.0
|
|
P2 Halitic
|
K
|
6.9
|
7.1
|
0.2
|
2.9
|
|
P3 Anydritic
|
K
|
9.9
|
10.1
|
0.2
|
2.0
|
|
P3 HGrade
|
K
|
11.9
|
11.8
|
-0.1
|
-0.8
|
|
P3 Halitic
|
K
|
10.5
|
10.6
|
0.1
|
1.0
|
|
Poly East HGrade
|
K
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
0
|
0.0
|
|
Poly East LGrade
|
K
|
9.9
|
9.9
|
0
|
0.0
|










| 11.8 |
Mineral Resource Classification
|
| 11.8.1 |
Mineral Resource Classification Criteria
|
| • |
Blocks estimated by ordinary kriging:
|
| o |
Indicated: Zones where majority of blocks have kriging efficiency between 0.4 and 1.0
|
| o |
Inferred: Zones where majority of blocks have kriging efficiency between 0.0 and 0.4
|
| • |
Blocks estimated by inverse distance weighting in Poly East – Northern area
|
| o |
Indicated: Up to 100m from data points or 150m away from holes towards NNE
|
| o |
Inferred: Up to 50 away from the indicated border
|
| • |
Blocks estimated by inverse distance weighting in Poly East – Southern area
|
| o |
Indicated: Up to 150m from data points towards NNE
|
| o |
Inferred: Up to 180 away from the indicated border
|
| • |
Drillhole spacing
|
| • |
Search pass during estimation
|
| • |
Downhole survey spacing
|
| • |
Assessment of geological and grade continuity
|
| • |
Evidence of geological and grade continuity based on mined out areas
|
| • |
Data representativity and data quality
|
| • |
Kriging efficiency
|
| • |
Kriging variance
|



| 11.9 |
Depletion
|
| 11.10 |
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
| 11.11 |
Mineral Resource Statement
|
| 11.12 |
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
| 12 |
| 12.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Boulby Mine – December
31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grade
(% K2O)
|
|
Proven
|
-
|
-
|
|
Probable
|
7.4
|
13.9
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Boulby and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Boulby.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a cut-off grade of 12.0% K2O equivalent.
|
| 7. |
A minimum mining width of 6 m was used.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 100%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a two-year average product price of $205/t FOB and an exchange rate of £0.79 per U.S. dollar.
|
| 12.2 |
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
| • |
An advance/development stage; advances two roadways either 8 m or 9 m wide depending on the equipment used to excavate the roadways, by 4 m to 4.5 m high (Note: for design
purposes 4.5 m roadway heights have been utilised); and
|
| • |
A retreat/second cut stage which includes “milling” and “stubs”. Milling extracts additional tonnes from the floor of the roadways driven on advance. Stubs extract additional
tonnes from the intra-pillars within the panel and barrier pillars left on advance between each production panel. The currently accepted maximum milling depth is 1.5 m to 2.0 m resulting in a final 6 m high roadway.
|
| 12.3 |
Mining Blocks
|
| • |
The difficulty for selective mining once a mining panel has been established; and
|
| • |
The minimum length of panels required for efficient utilisation of mining equipment.
|
| 12.4 |
Mine Layout
|
| 12.5 |
Mining Losses
|
| • |
Losses within areas where milling is not practicable or economic due to grade below cut-off;
|
| • |
Losses within areas due to unforeseen geological difficulties i.e. seam thinning, reduction in grade etc.
|
| • |
Losses within areas due to unforeseen geotechnical difficulties preventing extraction of “stubs” and/or areas of “milling” i.e. faulting, fracturing, high stress or
deterioration of the roadways.
|
| 12.6 |
Dilution
|
| 12.7 |
Cut-Off Grade
|
| 12.8 |
Mine Sequencing and Scheduling
|
| 12.9 |
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
| 12.10 |
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
| 13 |
| 13.1 |
Geotechnical
|
| 13.1.1 |
Rock Stress Environment
|
| 13.1.2 |
Rock Mass Properties
|
|
Table 13.1: Summary of Pillar Dimensions (Remnant Pillar Size)
|
||
|
Pillar Type
|
Description
|
Size (m)
|
|
Barrier Pillars
|
Production Panel and Laterals
|
40
|
|
Between Production Panels (retreat)
|
37
|
|
|
Chain Pillar
|
Length (Advance)
|
52
|
|
Width (Advance)
|
27
|
|
|
Width between sumps (Retreat)
|
7
|
|
| 13.1.3 |
Validation of Geotechnical Parameters and Design
|
| 13.2 |
Mine Design Layouts
|



| 13.3 |
Hydrogeology
|
| 13.4 |
Mine Production
|
| 13.5 |
Underground Infrastructure
|
| 13.5.1 |
Shafts
|
| 13.5.2 |
Main Access and Transport
|
| 13.5.3 |
Polyhalite Access
|
| 13.5.4 |
Ore Handling Systems
|
| 13.5.5 |
Waste Handling Systems
|
| • |
A sudden uplift in the base of seam at gradients which cannot be fully overcome by mining;
|
| • |
Increased halite content due to mining towards the top of seam; or
|
| • |
Increased thickness and occurrence of seam parallel veins.
|
| 13.5.6 |
Ventilation
|
| 13.5.7 |
Dewatering/Pumping
|
| 13.5.8 |
Mine Layout
|

| 13.6 |
Production
|
|
Table 13.2: Boulby Mine Production (2020 to 2025)
|
|||||
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
Hoisted Tonnes (kt)
|
711
|
784
|
947
|
1,028
|
719
|
|
Product Tonnes (kt)
|
709
|
789
|
953
|
1,009
|
721
|
| 13.7 |
Life of Mine Plan
|
|
Table 13.3: Boulby Life of Mine Schedule
|
||||||||||||
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
2030
|
2031
|
2032
|
2033
|
2034
|
2035
|
Total
|
|
|
Waste Tonnes (Mt)
|
0.09
|
0.14
|
0.11
|
0.10
|
0.13
|
0.09
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
0.12
|
1.2
|
|
Proven Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
K₂0 (%)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Probable Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
0.67
|
0.64
|
0.69
|
0.70
|
0.67
|
0.71
|
0.69
|
0.67
|
0.68
|
0.64
|
0.64
|
7.4
|
|
K₂0 (%)
|
14.0
|
14.1
|
14.0
|
13.9
|
13.6
|
13.4
|
13.8
|
13.9
|
14.0
|
14.2
|
14.1
|
13.9
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
0.67
|
0.64
|
0.69
|
0.70
|
0.67
|
0.71
|
0.69
|
0.67
|
0.68
|
0.64
|
0.64
|
7.4
|
|
K₂0 (%)
|
14.0
|
14.1
|
14.0
|
13.9
|
13.6
|
13.4
|
13.8
|
13.9
|
14.0
|
14.2
|
14.1
|
13.9
|
| 1. |
Ore tonnes are Probable Mineral Reserves as presented in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 2. |
Mining losses of 10% and no mining dilution applied as detailed in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 3. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 13.8 |
Mining Equipment
|
|
Table 13.4: Main Mining Fleet
|
||||||||
|
Equipment Type
|
Model №
|
OEM
|
Number
|
Active Polyhalite Fleet
|
Active Bunker Fleet
|
Active Salt Fleet
|
Spares & Repairs
|
Total
|
|
Miners
|
12HM36
|
Joy-Komatsu
|
6
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
7
|
|
12HM46
|
Joy-Komatsu
|
1
|
||||||
|
Shuttle Cars
|
10SC32 (25t)
|
Joy-Komatsu
|
8
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
8
|
|
Drills
|
Single Boom Jumbo
|
LINGDALE
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
|
Single Boom Jumbo
|
BOART
|
1
|
||||||
|
Single Boom Jumbo
|
EIMCO
|
2
|
||||||
|
Roof Bolters
|
711
|
EIMCO
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
9
|
|
DDR-77
|
Fletcher
|
3
|
||||||
|
3045
|
Joy-Komatsu
|
1
|
||||||
|
Feeder Breakers
|
UFB-33B-64-114C
|
Joy-Komatsu
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
|
UFB-33B-78-172C
|
Joy-Komatsu
|
1
|
||||||
|
Bridge Conveyor
|
Dale Engineering
|
1
|
||||||
|
Panel Carrier
|
Tracked Panel Carrier
|
Dale Engineering
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
CFT Fans
|
Fans
|
CFT
|
5
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
5
|
|
Total
|
22
|
2
|
5
|
10
|
39
|
|||
|
Table 13.5: Ancillary Equipment Fleet
|
|
|
Equipment Type
|
Number
|
|
Personnel Carriers
|
44
|
|
Forklift Trucks
|
4
|
|
Load Haul Dump (LHD’s)
|
8
|
|
Telehandlers
|
19
|
|
Neuson 701 (Skid steer front-end loaders)
|
3
|
|
Neuson dumper
|
2
|
|
Kramer 350 (articulated front-end loader)
|
1
|
|
Tractor
|
1
|
|
Wirgen Road Grader
|
1
|
| 13.9 |
Mining Personnel
|
|
Table 13.6: Labour for the Underground Mining Operations
|
|
|
Role/Position
|
Number
|
|
Production
|
170
|
|
Gap Crew
|
9
|
|
Shafts and Winder
|
32
|
|
Geology
|
16
|
|
Ventilation
|
2
|
|
Survey
|
3
|
|
Rock Engineering
|
7
|
|
Infrastructure
|
98
|
|
Total
|
337
|
| 14 |
| 14.1 |
Polysulphate® Process Description
|

| 14.2 |
PotashpluS® Process Description
|

| 14.3 |
Processing Personnel
|
|
Table 14.1: Labour for the Processing Operations
|
|
|
Role / Position
|
Number
|
|
Head of Operations (Processing)
|
1
|
|
Head of Departments
|
3
|
|
Laboratory
|
8
|
|
Process Engineer
|
2
|
|
Production
|
40
|
|
Logistics / Materials
|
10
|
|
Maintenance – Mechanical
|
16
|
|
Maintenance – E&I
|
12
|
|
Total
|
92
|
| 15 |
| 15.1 |
Surface Layout
|

| 15.2 |
Roads
|
| • |
Access from the public highway to the Boulby mine shall be via the existing access to the A147 and no other access shall be used.
|
| • |
All vehicles involved in the transport of materials or finished products to or from the Boulby mine shall be thoroughly cleaned as necessary before leaving the site so that no
mud or waste materials are deposited on the public highway. Vehicle washing facilities shall be retained on site for the duration of the development and shall be kept in full working order at all times.
|
| • |
All road vehicles (and rail wagons) transporting mineral, mineral products or waste materials shall be securely covered or sheeted to ensure the effective containment of dust
of other debris.
|
| • |
No more than 66 Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) loaded with mineral product shall leave the site each day and no more than 150,000 tonnes of mineral product shall be transported
from the site by road in any 12-month period.
|
| • |
No HGVs used for the import of MOP, dispatching of mineral products from the site or for the transport of waste materials arising from the phased deconstruction works shall
enter the site before 6:45 am or leave the site before 7:30 am each day and no HGVs are to be used for dispatching product or transport of waste materials from the site after 7:00 pm each day.
|
| • |
A written record of the number, timing of HGV movements entering and leaving the site each day and quantity of mineral products transported shall be kept, with a copy provided
to the Mineral Planning Authority on a monthly basis.
|
| • |
In addition, ICL Boulby is required to review the potential for enhanced sustainable travel measures and initiatives.
|
| 15.3 |
Rail
|
| 15.4 |
Port
|
| 15.5 |
Energy
|
| 15.6 |
Water
|
| 15.7 |
Effluent Tunnel / Dewatering
|
| 15.8 |
Waste Tips and Stockpiles
|
| 16 |
| 16.1 |
Commodity Price Projections
|
| 16.2 |
Contracts
|
| 16.2.1 |
Polyhalite Sales Contracts
|
| 16.2.2 |
Other Contracts
|
| 17 |
| 17.1 |
Permitting
|
|
Table 17.1: Summary of Environmental Permits
|
||
|
Permit reference
|
Function
|
Compliance Agency
|
|
EPR/BL7973IW 2002
|
Following the decommissioning of the Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant in Q3 2023, this permit (issued in 2002) has been surrendered to the Environment
Agency, and is currently awaiting confirmation.
|
Environment Agency
|
|
CPL-209A
|
Environmental performance and emissions of main stack on-site.
|
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
|
|
NE/027/0029/010
|
Abstraction licence for mine dewatering. Issued on March 29, 2021 and expires on March 31, 2027.
|
Environment Agency
|
|
2/27/29/131
|
Permission to abstract water via surface dewatering. Issued on June 26, 2012.
|
Environment Agency
|
|
L/2016/00111/1
|
Licence for permission for ICL Boulby to dredge the sea floor. Issued in 2016.
|
Marine Management Organisation
|
|
UK-E-IN-11399
|
Greenhouse gas emissions permit covers the site activities regulated by the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), requiring ICL Boulby to monitor and report
greenhouse gas emissions. Issued in 2022.
|
Environment Agency
|
|
CIA/T00077
|
Climate change agreement including voluntary targets for electricity consumption. Issued on December 19, 2020.
|
Environment Agency
|
|
EPR/BB3037RC
|
Discharge of effluent from the mine via the effluent tunnel to the North Sea
|
Environment Agency
|
|
QB3795DU
|
Management of radioactive sources on site.
|
Environment Agency
|
|
NYM/2019/0764/MEIA
|
Permit is valid from 2023 to 2048 and imposes environmental monitoring and performance requirements including:
• Noise and
vibration management;
• Dust and
air quality management;
• Lighting
management;
• Access and
transport limits to heavy goods vehicles;
• Landscape
and visual amenity;
• Tree
planting and soft landscaping works;
• Landscape
and ecological management
• Prevention
of pollution
• Ecological
Management Plan
• Protected
Species Management Plan
• Carbon
offsetting scheme
|
North York Moors National Park Authority
|
| 17.2 |
Chemicals and Fuel
|
| 17.3 |
Chemicals Underground
|
| 17.4 |
Waste Management and Disposal
|
| 17.4.1 |
Tips/Stockpiles
|
| 17.4.2 |
Non-Mining Waste
|
| 17.4.3 |
Non-Mining Water and Effluent Management
|
| 17.4.4 |
Hazardous Materials Storage and Handling
|
| 17.5 |
Air Quality and Noise
|
| 17.5.1 |
Dust
|
| 17.5.2 |
Noise and Vibration
|
| 17.5.3 |
Lighting Management
|
| • |
Permanent removal of all unnecessary or redundant lighting units;
|
| • |
Placement of all fixed/mobile lighting units at low level with minimal upward/horizontal light spill from site;
|
| • |
Utilisation of automated timing/proximity activated lighting units, where feasible; and
|
| • |
Closing of unnecessary gaps in cladding to eliminate the possibility of internal lighting being perceived externally.
|
| 17.6 |
Community and Social
|
| 17.6.1 |
Social
|
| • |
Supporting local schools by providing educational resources and sponsoring extracurricular activities.
|
| • |
Partnering with local businesses to promote economic growth and development.
|
| • |
Organising Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) events to foster a sense of community and promote social cohesion.
|
| • |
Supporting local charities, employee fundraising efforts, and non-profit organisations through the Boulby Community Fund.
|
| 17.6.2 |
Social Initiatives and Community Development
|
| • |
The Community Fund is designed to support local organisations, charities and initiatives that benefit the community. Over the years, the fund has supported a
wide range of projects, including renovation of local community centres, provision of equipment for local sports teams, and establishment of community gardens. The fund has been in operation since 2016 and has provided financial
assistance to nearly 200 groups.
|
| • |
In addition, ICL Boulby runs a number of community development programmes. These programmes aim to improve the skills and employability of local people, as well
as to promote economic growth and social cohesion. These programmes include apprenticeships and training programmes such as mechanical and electrical engineering.
|
| • |
Community Forum meetings are held on a quarterly basis where local residents and councillors from the surrounding areas are invited to share concerns and ideas
for initiatives.
|
| • |
ICL Boulby is a member of the Redcar & Cleveland Ambassador programme to discuss and explore ways to promote and enhance the economic growth and development
of the area.
|
| • |
Educational bursaries are offered for university students.
|
| 17.6.3 |
Stakeholder Dialogue and Grievance Mechanisms
|
| • |
SC1 – Subsidiary Companies;
|
| • |
SC2 – Shareholders;
|
| • |
SC3 – Communities;
|
| • |
SC4 – Workforce (including associated external companies and contractors);
|
| • |
SC5 - Local and Central Government;
|
| • |
SC6 - Private security and Emergency Services
|
| • |
SC7 – Regulatory Authorities
|
| • |
SC8 - Community Educational Institutions
|
| • |
SC9 – Influence Groups
|
| • |
SC10 – Agricultural Community
|
| • |
SC11 - Utility Providers
|
| • |
Primary area of influence: those communities that are directly impacted by current mining and future closure activities. These are usually those communities that lie within or
directly adjacent to the mining operation’s footprint and can also be referred to as “doorstep communities”. Their proximity implies that they are most affected by the activities of the mine, and they require a more focused engagement
regarding mine closure. However, other local communities located in the immediate vicinity of the mine can also be included in the primary area of influence, depending on the nature and extent of mining associated impacts (dust
propagation, visual impact, surface- and groundwater impacts, vibration, etc.).
|
| • |
Secondary area of influence: non-adjacent labour sending communities, interest groups, and other stakeholders that experience lesser/indirect impacts.
|
| 17.7 |
Health and Safety
|
| • |
General Induction;
|
| • |
Manual Handling;
|
| • |
Hand Arm vibration;
|
| • |
Risk Assessments;
|
| • |
Noise at Work;
|
| • |
LMS Induction;
|
| • |
Fire Safety;
|
| • |
HR Department;
|
| • |
Safety Department;
|
| • |
GOARC/Enablon – Electronic platforms for data collection on Incidents, Near Misses and Hazards;
|
| • |
Accreditations – ISO9001, ISO14001 and ISO45001;
|
| • |
Well-being Department;
|
| • |
Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Health Monitoring – Dust, Noise, HAVS; and
|
| • |
Quality and Environmental Department.
|
| 17.8 |
Mine Closure Plan
|
| • |
Developed decommissioning, pre-demolition preps, demolition work scopes and landscaping.
|
| • |
Carry out pre-demolition asbestos surveys.
|
| • |
Develop Construction Design and Management (CDM) requirements.
|
| • |
Pre-qualification and award of contractors.
|
| • |
Statutory notifications.
|
| • |
Decommissioning of redundant asset including:
|
| o |
Clean and purge all equipment.
|
| o |
Isolate, equipment and drives.
|
| o |
Physical air gapping of all equipment.
|
| o |
Complete any pre demolition works to divert and operational infrastructure to remain post demolition.
|
| • |
Undertake ecology studies prior to demolition phases to ensure control measures / arrangements are in place.
|
| • |
Mobilise demolition contractors, establish laydown areas, contractors welfare, develop Risk Assessment Method Statements (RAMs), notifications to HSE.
|
| • |
Remove all visible and loose contaminated material (such as remnant product and soil mixtures) from bases, paving and/or exposed soil areas and terraced embankments.
|
| • |
Select appropriate wet and dry decontamination techniques to prevent secondary contamination of soils and the broader receiving environment and construct an appropriate
decontamination bay with suitable water management structures to capture sediment run-off during decontamination activities.
|
| • |
Identify contaminated and degraded concrete bases and hazardous components of structures that will require decontamination and specialist handling.
|
| • |
Remove remnant chemical inventories and identify potential hydrocarbon contamination or other hazardous components that may require specialist handling during the demolition
phase.
|
| • |
Demolition phase:
|
| o |
Prepare structures earmarked for demolition for structural dis-assembly, by removing all furniture, fittings, equipment, cabling and pipes, etc.
|
| o |
Isolate and disassemble small salvageable equipment.
|
| o |
Dismantle and removal of structures.
|
| o |
Crush concrete arising from the removal of plinths, bases, footings to a pre-determined size.
|
| o |
Segregate crushed concrete designated for offsite disposal from concrete to be used for infill on site.
|
| o |
Sort and screen waste as close as practical to the footprint area of the building being demolished, and package or prepare for offsite transport and/or disposal.
|
| • |
Close Out:
|
| o |
Compile the Health and Safety File.
|
| 17.9 |
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
| 18 |
| 18.1 |
Capital Costs
|
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for Boulby Mine
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
79.4
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
39.2
|
|
Total Capital Costs
|
$M
|
118.6
|
| 18.2 |
Operating Costs
|
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for Boulby Mine
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
692.2
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
508.5
|
|
G&A
|
$M
|
211.9
|
|
Total Operating Costs
|
$M
|
1,412.5
|
| 19 |
| 19.1 |
Economic Criteria
|
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for the Boulby Mine
|
||
|
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
|
Mining
|
||
|
Mine Life
|
Years
|
11
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes Mined
|
Mt
|
7.4
|
|
Waste Tonnes
|
Mt
|
1.2
|
|
Mining Rate (Ore and Waste)
|
Mtpa
|
0.78
|
|
Processing
|
||
|
Total Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
7.4
|
|
Grade KCl
|
%
|
13.9
|
|
Processing Rate
|
Mtpa
|
0.67
|
|
Plant Recovery
|
%
|
100.0
|
|
Economic Factors
|
||
|
Discount Rate
|
%
|
8
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
£ to $
|
0.79
|
|
Commodity Price
|
$/t FOB
|
205
|
|
Taxes
|
%
|
25
|
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
32.4
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
6.7
|
|
Revenues
|
$M
|
1,705.4
|
|
Capital Costs (including closure)
|
$M
|
203.4
|
|
Operating Costs
|
$M
|
1,412.5
|
| 19.2 |
Cash Flow Analysis
|
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for the Boulby Mine
|
||||||||||||||
|
Description
|
Unit
|
LOM Total
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
2030
|
2031
|
2032
|
2033
|
2034
|
2035
|
2036
|
|
Mining
|
||||||||||||||
|
Ore
|
Mt
|
7.4
|
0.670
|
0.640
|
0.690
|
0.700
|
0.667
|
0.712
|
0.694
|
0.670
|
0.678
|
0.638
|
0.637
|
0
|
|
Waste
|
Mt
|
1.2
|
0.09
|
0.14
|
0.11
|
0.10
|
0.13
|
0.09
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
0.12
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
||||||||||||||
|
Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
7.4
|
0.67
|
0.64
|
0.69
|
0.70
|
0.67
|
0.71
|
0.69
|
0.67
|
0.68
|
0.64
|
0.64
|
0
|
|
Grade K2O
|
%
|
13.9
|
14.0
|
14.1
|
14.0
|
13.9
|
13.6
|
13.4
|
13.8
|
13.9
|
14.0
|
14.2
|
14.1
|
0
|
|
Product*
|
Mt
|
8.3
|
0.75
|
0.72
|
0.77
|
0.78
|
0.75
|
0.80
|
0.78
|
0.75
|
0.76
|
0.72
|
0.72
|
0
|
|
Revenue
|
||||||||||||||
|
Product
|
$M
|
1,705.4
|
154.5
|
148.4
|
158.7
|
160.7
|
153.9
|
163.1
|
159.4
|
154.6
|
156.1
|
148.1
|
147.9
|
0
|
|
Operating Costs
|
||||||||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
692.2
|
66.7
|
63.4
|
62.9
|
62.4
|
61.9
|
63.0
|
62.8
|
62.4
|
62.5
|
62.0
|
61.9
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
508.5
|
49.0
|
46.6
|
46.2
|
45.8
|
45.6
|
46.3
|
46.1
|
45.9
|
45.9
|
45.6
|
45.6
|
0
|
|
G&A
|
$M
|
211.9
|
20.4
|
19.4
|
19.2
|
19.1
|
19.0
|
19.4
|
19.2
|
19.1
|
19.1
|
19.0
|
19.0
|
0
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
1,412.5
|
136.1
|
129.4
|
128.4
|
127.3
|
126.5
|
128.7
|
128.1
|
127.5
|
127.7
|
126.5
|
126.5
|
0
|
|
Capital Costs
|
||||||||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
79.4
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
6.2
|
4.2
|
2.8
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
39.2
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
1.3
|
0
|
|
Closure
|
$M
|
84.8
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
84.8
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
203.4
|
12.0
|
12.0
|
12.0
|
12.0
|
12.0
|
12.0
|
12.0
|
12.0
|
10.0
|
8.0
|
4.1
|
84.8
|
|
Cash Flow
|
||||||||||||||
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
32.4
|
2.3
|
1.9
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
2.9
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
2.8
|
2.8
|
0
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
6.7
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0
|
|
Pre-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
50.4
|
1.9
|
3.0
|
12.2
|
17.0
|
12.5
|
19.2
|
16.2
|
12.2
|
15.4
|
10.9
|
14.7
|
0
|
|
Tax (25%)
|
$M
|
33.8
|
0.5
|
0.8
|
3.0
|
4.3
|
3.2
|
4.8
|
4.1
|
3.0
|
3.9
|
2.7
|
3.7
|
0
|
|
After-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
16.6
|
1.5
|
2.3
|
9.1
|
12.8
|
9.4
|
14.4
|
12.2
|
9.1
|
11.6
|
8.1
|
11.0
|
0
|
|
Project Economics
|
||||||||||||||
|
After Tax NPV (8%)
|
$M
|
30.3
|
1.5
|
2.1
|
7.8
|
10.1
|
6.9
|
9.8
|
7.7
|
5.3
|
6.3
|
4.1
|
5.1
|
-36.4
|
|
* Includes imported potash used in Potashplus®
|
||||||||||||||
| 19.3 |
Sensitivity Analysis
|
| • |
Commodity price
|
| • |
Exchange rate
|
| • |
Operating costs
|
| • |
Capital costs
|
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for the Boulby Mine
|
||
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Commodity Price ($/t)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
164
|
-187.0
|
|
-10%
|
170
|
-68.0
|
|
0%
|
205
|
30.3
|
|
10%
|
226
|
120.1
|
|
20%
|
246
|
209.9
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Exchange Rate (£/$)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
0.63
|
-187.0
|
|
-10%
|
0.71
|
-68.0
|
|
0%
|
0.79
|
30.3
|
|
10%
|
0.87
|
120.1
|
|
20%
|
0.95
|
209.9
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Operating Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
1,130.4
|
179.3
|
|
-10%
|
1,270.9
|
104.8
|
|
0%
|
1,412.5
|
30.3
|
|
10%
|
1,554.4
|
-49.9
|
|
20%
|
1,694.9
|
-146.2
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Capital Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
163.3
|
50.5
|
|
-10%
|
183.5
|
40.4
|
|
0%
|
203.4
|
30.3
|
|
10%
|
224.1
|
20.2
|
|
20%
|
244.3
|
10.0
|
| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 22.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Mineral Resources for the Property have been prepared to industry best practice and conform to the resource categories defined by the SEC in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
The geology and mineralization of the deposits is well understood and includes significant operational experience.
|
| • |
A total of 90 parent holes are contained in the drillhole database. In these holes a total of 949 deflections have been completed. Of these 949 deflections, 305 deflections are
polyhalite seam intersections from which assay results are available. The 605 deflections are spread across 55 holes and are used in the current Mineral Resource estimate. This totals 191,744 m of parent and daughter hole drilling of
which approximately 28,148 m has been sampled by ICL Boulby as of April 1, 2024.
|
| • |
The sample preparation, analyses, QA/QC procedures, and sample security are acceptable and in line with industry standard practice. Data verification identified no significant
issues with the databases used for Mineral Resource estimation.
|
| • |
No Measured Mineral Resources are classified due to a lack of closely spaced drillholes (needed to predict variation in salt content, polyhalite grade and seam position on a
production panel basis. Indicated Mineral Resources were generally defined within 100 m drillhole spacing with some areas up to 150 m. Remaining areas were classified as Inferred Mineral Resources.
|
| • |
There is significant exploration potential at the Boulby deposit and particularly in the Zone 2 area.
|
| 22.2 |
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
| • |
Mineral Reserves for the Property have been classified in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Reserves in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
Indicated Mineral Resources were converted to Probable Mineral Reserves. Inferred Mineral Resources were not converted to Mineral Reserves.
|
| • |
Mining uses a modified room and pillar method with electric powered continuous miner machines. Production panels are defined, and the continuous miners extract in these
following the visible seam in the face. The mining method is well established with many years of operating experience.
|
| • |
The current LOM runs from 2025 to 2035 (inclusive).
|
| 22.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
The operation has a long history of processing polyhalite mineralisation. Mineral processing involves simple crushing and screening, and metallurgical recovery is 100 %.
|
| • |
Research is being undertaken to further enhance the standard products through compaction, granulation, blending and micronutrient addition which, in combination, has the
potential to deliver high value new fertilizer products.
|
| 22.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
All infrastructure is in place and no significant upgrades or changes are planned.
|
| 22.5 |
Environment
|
| • |
Permits held by ICL Boulby for the Property are sufficient to ensure that mining activities are conducted within the regulatory framework required by regulations.
|
| • |
There are currently no known environmental, permitting, or social/community risks that could impact the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves.
|
| 23 |
| 23.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Continue the current sampling and analysis methodology for drill core supported by continuation of the current QA/QC sample programme.
|
| • |
Testing of core samples for density to continue and a comparison of estimation for density using these results into the resource model against the current methodology of grade
assignation using a regression equation should be made once sufficient sample results are available.
|
| • |
Testing of retained historic core for density should be carried out if possible. Targeting of historic core from positions in and around mined out production areas would allow
mining reconciliation equations to be refined using actual density results rather than density estimated from regression equations.
|
| • |
As exploration to the east and south of the current resource area continues, bring in these drill results to expand the extents of the current Mineral Resource model to help
guide further exploration drilling and planning.
|
| 23.2 |
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
| • |
To date an analysis of production panels shows the overall mining recovery from each panel compared with the planned recovery results in approximately 10 % mining losses. The
QP considers losses from each panel should be continuously reviewed as mining progresses.
|
| 23.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
Continue research into new high value fertilizer products.
|
| • |
Investigate the potential for a surface blending facility.
|
| 23.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Continue using and improving the environmental management system and maintain its ISO accredited standard.
|
| • |
Continue active engagement with local communities and stakeholders through formal and informal projects and outreach.
|
| • |
ICL Boulby should progress the application with the NYMPA to extend the import of MOP beyond the current permit of December 31, 2027.
|
| 24 |
| 25 |
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report,
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report, and
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources.
|
| 26 |
|
Qualified Person or Firm
|
Signature
|
Date
|
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
“signed”
|
February 27, 2025
|

|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE CABANASSES AND VILAFRUNS MINING OPERATION, SPAIN
February 27, 2025
|
|
Wardell Armstrong (part of SLR)
Baldhu House, Wheal Jane Earth Science Park, Baldhu, Truro, Cornwall, TR3 6EH,
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)1872 560738 www.wardell-armstrong.com
|
|
|
EFFECTIVE DATE:
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
DATE ISSUED:
|
February 27, 2025
|
|
JOB NUMBER:
|
ZT61-2273
|
|
VERSION:
REPORT NUMBER:
STATUS:
|
V3.0
MM1807
Final
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE CABANASSES AND VILAFRUNS MINING OPERATION, SPAIN
|
|
|
Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong International Ltd,
Registered in England No. 3813172. Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom
UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Bolton, Bristol, Bury St Edmunds, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh,
Glasgow, Leeds, London, Newcastle upon Tyne and Truro. International Office: Almaty.
|
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
LAND AND PROPERTY
MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING
MINERAL ESTATES
WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE
CABANASSES AND VILAFRUNS MINING OPERATION, SPAIN
|
|
|
1
|
|
1.1
|
Property Description
|
1
|
|
|
1.2
|
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
2
|
|
|
1.3
|
History
|
2
|
|
|
1.4
|
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
4 | |
|
1.5
|
Exploration
|
5 | |
|
1.6
|
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
5 | |
|
1.7
|
Data Verification
|
6
|
|
|
1.8
|
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
6
|
|
|
1.9
|
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
6 | |
|
1.10
|
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
7
|
|
|
1.11
|
Mining Methods
|
8
|
|
|
1.12
|
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
9
|
|
|
1.13
|
Infrastructure
|
9
|
|
|
1.14
|
Market Studies
|
10
|
|
|
1.15
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
10
|
|
|
1.16
|
Capital, Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
10
|
|
|
1.17
|
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
11
|
|
|
1.18
|
Recommendations
|
11
|
|
12
|
|
2.1
|
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
12 | |
|
2.2
|
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
12 | |
|
2.3
|
Sources of Information
|
13 | |
|
2.4
|
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
14 | |
|
2.5
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
14 | |
|
2.6
|
Units and Abbreviations
|
15 |
|
18
|
|
3.1
|
Tenure
|
19 | |
|
3.2
|
Royalties and Other Payments
|
21 | |
|
3.3
|
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
21 |
|
22
|
|
4.1
|
Accessibility
|
22 | |
|
4.2
|
Climate
|
22 | |
|
4.3
|
Local Resources
|
22 | |
|
4.4
|
Infrastructure
|
23 | |
|
4.5
|
Physiography
|
24 |
|
25
|
|
5.1
|
Ownership, Development and Exploration History
|
25 | |
|
5.2
|
Production History
|
25 |
|
27
|
|
6.1
|
Regional Geology
|
27 | |
|
6.2
|
Local and Property Geology
|
29 | |
|
6.3
|
Mineralisation
|
35 | |
|
6.4
|
Deposit Type
|
35 |
|
37
|
|
7.1
|
Seismic Surveys
|
37 | |
|
7.2
|
Drilling
|
38 | |
|
7.3
|
QP Opinion
|
45
|
| 48 |
|
8.1
|
Underground Drill Samples
|
48 | |
|
8.2
|
Surface Drill Samples
|
50 | |
|
8.3
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
|
51 | |
|
8.4
|
QP Opinion
|
63 |
| 64 |
|
9.1
|
Site Visits
|
64 | |
|
9.2
|
Drillhole Database
|
64 | |
|
9.3
|
QP Opinion
|
72 |
|
73
|
|
74
|
|
11.1
|
Summary
|
74 | |
|
11.2
|
Database Cut-Off Dates
|
75 | |
|
11.3
|
Data Transformations
|
75
|
|
|
11.4
|
Software
|
76 | |
|
11.5
|
Drillhole Databases
|
76 | |
|
11.6
|
Geological Interpretation
|
78 | |
|
11.7
|
Drillhole Data Processing
|
81 | |
|
11.8
|
Variography
|
84 | |
|
11.9
|
Block Modelling
|
84 | |
|
11.10
|
Density
|
84 | |
|
11.11
|
Grade Estimation
|
85 | |
|
11.12
|
Reconciliation with Mining Production Data
|
90 | |
|
11.13
|
Mineral Resource Classification
|
91 | |
|
11.14
|
Depletion and Non-Recoverable Resources
|
93
|
|
|
11.15
|
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
94 | |
|
11.16
|
Mineral Resource Statement
|
94 |
|
|
11.17
|
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
94 |
| 95 |
|
12.1
|
Summary
|
95
|
|
|
12.2
|
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
96
|
|
|
12.3
|
Dilution and Mining Recovery
|
97 | |
|
12.4
|
Cut-Off Grade
|
97 | |
|
12.5
|
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
97 | |
|
12.6
|
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
97
|
|
98
|
|
13.1
|
Geotechnics and Hydrogeology
|
98
|
|
|
13.2
|
Mine Production
|
98
|
|
|
13.3
|
Underground Infrastructure
|
99
|
|
|
13.4
|
Production
|
101
|
|
|
13.5
|
Life of Mine Schedule
|
101
|
|
|
13.6
|
Mining Equipment
|
103
|
|
|
13.7
|
Mining Personnel
|
104
|
| 105 |
|
14.1
|
Process Description
|
106 | |
|
14.2
|
Processing Personnel
|
109 | |
|
14.3
|
Discussion on Processing and Recovery Methods
|
109 |
|
110
|
|
15.1
|
Surface Layout
|
110
|
|
|
15.2
|
Roads
|
111
|
|
|
15.3
|
Rail
|
112
|
|
|
15.4
|
Port
|
112
|
|
|
15.5
|
Energy
|
112
|
|
|
15.6
|
Water
|
112
|
|
|
15.7
|
Effluent Water
|
112
|
|
|
15.8
|
Waste Dumps and Salt Transportation Pipeline
|
112
|
| 113 |
|
16.1
|
Potash Market
|
113 | |
|
16.2
|
Demand
|
113 | |
|
16.3
|
Commodity Price Projections
|
114 | |
|
16.4
|
Contracts
|
114 |
| 115 |
|
17.1
|
Permitting
|
115
|
|
|
17.2
|
Water
|
116
|
|
|
17.3
|
Air Emissions
|
117
|
|
|
17.4
|
Waste
|
118
|
|
|
17.5
|
Environmental Health and Safety Management
|
118 | |
|
17.6
|
Plans, Negotiations or Agreements with Stakeholders
|
119
|
|
|
17.7
|
Mine Closure Plans
|
120 | |
|
17.8
|
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
120
|
|
121
|
|
18.1
|
Capital Costs
|
121 | |
|
18.2
|
Operating Costs
|
121
|
| 122 |
|
19.1
|
Economic Criteria
|
122 | |
|
19.2
|
Cash Flow Analysis
|
123
|
|
|
19.3
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
124
|
| 126 |
| 127 |
| 128 |
|
22.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
128 | |
|
22.2
|
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
128 | |
|
22.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
129
|
|
|
22.4
|
Infrastructure
|
129
|
|
|
22.5
|
Environment
|
129 |
| 130 |
|
23.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
130 | |
|
23.2
|
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
130 | |
|
23.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
130 | |
|
23.4
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
130 |
| 131 |
| 132 |
| 133 |
|
TABLES
|
|
|
Table 1.1: Summary of Production History
|
3
|
|
Table 1.2: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Cabanasses and Vilafruns Mines
|
7
|
|
Table 1.3: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Cabanasses Mine – December 31, 2024
|
8
|
|
Table 5.1: Summary of Production History
|
26 |
|
Table 6.1: Detailed Stratigraphic Column for Cabanasses Area
|
30 |
|
Table 7.1: Summary of Cabanasses and Vilafruns Drillholes
|
39 |
|
Table 7.2: Summary Statistical Analysis of KCl (%) and KClcorr at Cabanasses
|
44 |
|
Table 8.1: SRM Samples Used by Cabanasses Laboratory (2022-2024)
|
55 |
|
Table 8.2: Summary of SRM Analysis (2022 to 2024) – Cabanasses Laboratory
|
55 |
|
Table 8.3: Summary of Blank Material Assaying
|
57
|
|
Table 8.4: Summary of Coarse Duplicates for 2022 to 2024 Exploration Drilling (Cabanasses Laboratory)
|
58 |
|
Table 8.5: Summary of Coarse Duplicates for 2022 to 2024 Exploration Drilling (ALS Laboratory)
|
59 |
|
Table 8.6: Summary of Pulp Duplicates Results for 2022 to 2024 Exploration Programmes (Cabanasses Laboratory)
|
60 |
|
Table 8.7: Summary of Pulp Duplicate Results for 2022 to 2024 Exploration Programmes (ALS Laboratory)
|
61 |
|
Table 8.8: Density Measurements by Lithology
|
62
|
|
Table 9.1: Summary Statistical Analysis for KCl (%) at Cabanasses Seam A
|
64 |
|
Table 9.2: Summary Statistical Analysis for KCl (%) at Cabanasses Seam B
|
66 |
|
Table 9.3: Summary Statistical Analysis for KCl (%) at Cabanasses Transformada Zone
|
67 |
|
Table 9.4: Duplicate Analysis of Drillhole C-2Bis
|
69 |
|
Table 9.5: Duplicate Analysis of Drillhole C-3
|
70 |
|
Table 9.6: Duplicate Analysis of Drillhole C-4Bis
|
71 |
|
Table 9.7: Duplicate Analysis of SAG1
|
72 |
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Cabanasses and Vilafruns Mines
|
75 |
|
Table 11.2: Drillhole Database Files
|
76 |
|
Table 11.3: Description of Database
|
76 |
|
Table 11.4: Summary of Stratigraphy and Database Lithology Codes
|
78 |
|
Table 11.5: Summary of Domains for Cabanasses and Vilafruns
|
80 |
|
Table 11.6: Summary Statistical Analysis of KCl (%) [CORR] for Selected Samples at Cabanasses
|
81 |
|
Table 11.7: Summary Statistical Analysis of KCl (%) [CORR] for Selected Samples at Vilafruns
|
82 |
|
Table 11.8: Block Model Prototypes
|
84 |
|
Table 11.9: Summary of Search Parameters
|
86 |
|
Table 11.10: Summary of Reconciliation of Cabanasses Resource Model with Mining Production Data
|
90 |
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Cabanasses Mine – December 31, 2024
|
95 |
|
Table 13.1: Cabanasses Mine Production (2021 to 2024)
|
101 |
|
Table 13.2: Cabanasses Life of Mine Schedule
|
102 |
|
Table 13.3: Summary of Mining Equipment
|
103 |
|
Table 13.4: Mining Personnel at Cabanasses Mine
|
104 |
|
Table 14.1: Súria Processing Plant Personnel
|
109 |
|
Table 17.1: Summary of ICL Iberia Permits
|
115 |
|
Table 17.2: ACA Wastewater Discharge Limits
|
117 |
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for Cabanasses Mine
|
121
|
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for Cabanasses Mine
|
121 |
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for the Cabanasses Mine
|
122 |
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for the Cabanasses Mine
|
123 |
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for the Cabanasses Mine
|
124 |
|
FIGURES
|
|
|
Figure 3.1: Location of the Cabanasses and Vilafruns Mines, Northeast Spain
|
18 |
|
Figure 3.2: Location of Cabanasses and Vilafuns Mines
|
19 |
|
Figure 3.3: ICL Iberia Concession Areas (Scale in km)
|
20 |
|
Figure 4.1: General Site Plan of the Cabanasses Mine (scale in km)
|
23 |
|
Figure 4.2: General Site Plan of the Vilafruns Mine (scale in km)
|
24 |
|
Figure 6.1: Location of the ICL Iberia Deposits within the Ebro Basin of the Iberian Peninsula
|
27 |
|
Figure 6.2: Regional Geology of the Pyrenees and Ebro Basin (Vergés et al, (2002))
|
28 |
|
Figure 6.3: Simplified Cross Section of the Pyrenees and Ebro Basin (Vergés et al, (2002))
|
29 |
|
Figure 6.4: Main Formations of the Eastern Pyrenean Foreland Basin (Vergés et al, (2002))
|
30 |
|
Figure 6.5: Location of Stratigraphic Cross Section through the Cabanasses Mine
|
31 |
|
Figure 6.6: Cross Section Showing the Stratigraphy of the Cabanasses Mine
|
31 |
|
Figure 6.7: Plan Showing Inset of Northeast of Ebro Basin
|
32 |
|
Figure 6.8: Inset of Figure 6.7 Showing Main Anticlinal Structures of the Northeast Ebro Basin (Sans (2003)) [SPMT – South Pyrenean Main
Thrust]
|
32 |
|
Figure 6.9: Cross Section through El Guix, Súria and Cardona Anticlines (Sans (2003)) [location of mines is shown as larger well symbols
and location of surface drillholes as smaller wells]
|
33 |
|
Figure 6.10: Example North-South Cross Sections Showing Along Strike Change in Structure of the Súria Anticline from East (bottom) to West
(top) (Sans (2003))
|
34
|
|
Figure 6.11: Cross Section Showing Structural Geology of the Tordell Thrust
|
35 |
|
Figure 7.1: Merged 2D and 3D Seismic Surveys of Cabanasses Area
|
38 |
|
Figure 7.2: Plan View of Underground and Surface Drillholes at Cabanasses by Drilling Year
|
40 |
|
Figure 7.3: Isometric View of Location of Underground Drillholes at Vilafruns by Drilling Year
|
40 |
|
Figure 7.4: Schematic Cross Section of LHD Drilling Method
|
41 |
|
Figure 7.5: Results of Analysis for KCl (%) and Ca2+ (%) for Control and Brine Group Samples
|
43 |
|
Figure 7.6: Histograms comparing KCl (%) and KClcorr for Cabanasses Seams A and B
|
44
|
|
Figure 7.7: Geological Cross Sections of Underground Drilling at Cabanasses
|
46 |
|
Figure 7.8: Geological Cross Sections of Underground Drilling at Vilafruns
|
47 |
|
Figure 8.1: Summary of Sample Preparation of Drill Core Sample from Underground Drilling
|
49 |
|
Figure 8.2: Internal Pulp Duplicates (Cabanasses Laboratory) for KCl (%) (2019 – 2021)
|
52 |
|
Figure 8.3: External Pulp Duplicates (ALS ) for KCl (%) (2019 – 2021)
|
54
|
|
Figure 8.4: Summary Results of Analysis of Standard 1 SRM During 2022 Through to 2024. All were Analysed at the Cabanasses Laboratory Except
the Circled Sample (ALS)
|
56 |
|
Figure 8.5: Summary of Blank Sample Results by Year for 2021 to 2024
|
57 |
|
Figure 8.6: Correlation Plot of Coarse Duplicate Sample Results 2022 to 2024 (Cabanasses Laboratory)
|
59 |
|
Figure 8.7: Correlation Plot of Coarse Duplicate Sample Results 2022 to 2024 (ALS Laboratory)
|
60 |
|
Figure 8.8: Correlation Plot of Pulp Duplicate Pairs Analysed at Cabanasses Laboratory 2022-2024
|
61 |
|
Figure 8.9: Correlation Plot of Pulp Duplicate Pairs Analysed at ALS Laboratory 2022-2024
|
62 |
|
Figure 9.1: Cabanasses Seam A: a) Log Probability Plots and b) Mean Grade Plots of KCl (%)
|
65 |
|
Figure 9.2: Cabanasses Seam B: a) Log Probability Plots and b) Mean Grade Plots of KCl (%)
|
66 |
|
Figure 9.3: Cabanasses Transformada: a) Log Probability Plots and b) Mean Grade Plots of KCl (%)
|
68 |
|
Figure 11.1: Plan View and Cross Sections of Drillholes at Cabanasses
|
77 |
|
Figure 11.2: Seam B (Base) Surface for Cabanasses and Showing Surface and Underground Drilling
|
79 |
|
Figure 11.3: Domain Definition at Cabanasses and Vilafruns
|
80 |
|
Figure 11.4: Probability Plot and Histogram of KClcorr (%) for Seam A Domain DS1 at Cabanasses
|
81 |
|
Figure 11.5: Probability Plot and Histogram of KClcorr (%) for Seam B Domain DS1 at Cabanasses
|
82 |
|
Figure 11.6: Probability Plot and Histogram of KClcorr (%) for Seam A Domain DV1 at Vilafruns
|
82 |
|
Figure 11.7: Probability Plot and Histogram of KClcorr (%) for Seam B Domain DV1 at Vilafruns
|
83 |
|
Figure 11.8: Calculation of Grade and True Thickness during Sample Compositing
|
83 |
|
Figure 11.9: Histograms of Density Measurements for Cabanasses for Seam A and Seam B (including Transformada Zone)
|
85 |
|
Figure 11.10: Block Model Showing Spatial Distribution of KClcorr (%) at Cabanasses
|
87 |
|
Figure 11.11: Block Model Showing Spatial Distribution of Seam Thicknesses (m) at Cabanasses
|
88 |
|
Figure 11.12: Example Swath Analysis for KClcorr (%) in A and B Seams at Cabanasses
|
89 |
|
Figure 11.13: Mineral Resource Classification for Cabanasses (Mined Out Areas in Blue)
|
93 |
|
Figure 12.1: Schematic Overview of the Life of Mine Design Layout at Cabanasses, Showing Existing Workings (grey), Seam A (green), Seam B
(red), and Planned Infrastructure
|
96 |
|
Figure 12.2: Schematic Detail of Mine Planning Layout at Cabanasses Showing Seam A (Green), Seam B (Grey) and Planned Infrastructure
|
96 |
|
Figure 13.1: Plan View of Existing Layout (Grey) of the Cabanasses Mine and Life of Mine Plan (5-year Increments) Showing Seam A (green)
and Seam B (red)
|
100 |
|
Figure 14.1: Summary Block Flow Diagram of the Súria Processing Plant Flowsheet
|
106 |
|
Figure 15.1: Surface Layout of the Cabanasses Mine (Súria)
|
110 |
|
Figure 15.2: Surface Layout of the Vilafruns Mine (Sallent)
|
111 |
|
Figure 15.3: Salt Transportation Pipeline from Catalan Potash Basin to Mediterranean
|
112 |
|
Figure 19.1: After-Tax 8% NPV Sensitivity Analysis
|
125 |
| 1 |
| 1.1 |
Property Description
|
| 1.2 |
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
| 1.3 |
History
|
|
Table 1.1: Summary of Production History
|
||||||
|
Year
|
Súria Processing Plant
|
Sallent Processing Plant
|
||||
|
Ore Hoisted
(kt)
|
Head Grade KCl (%)
|
Product
(kt)
|
Ore Hoisted
(kt)
|
Head Grade KCl (%)
|
Product
(kt)
|
|
|
1995
|
2,206.7
|
24.6
|
486.8
|
1,976.5
|
22.5
|
383.7
|
|
1996
|
2,179.7
|
24.4
|
455.8
|
2,647.8
|
21.9
|
468.6
|
|
1997
|
2,271.7
|
23.7
|
469.4
|
2,837.9
|
21.4
|
513.4
|
|
1998
|
1,937.6
|
22.5
|
373.4
|
2,519.5
|
20.2
|
431.1
|
|
1999
|
2,108.4
|
22.0
|
390.2
|
2,820.6
|
20.8
|
499.7
|
|
2000
|
2,189.0
|
22.8
|
428.5
|
2,571.7
|
20.0
|
441.5
|
|
2001
|
1,741.3
|
26.1
|
396.7
|
1,923.9
|
23.2
|
388.2
|
|
2002
|
1,526.6
|
28.0
|
382.6
|
1,420.1
|
23.5
|
295.2
|
|
2003
|
1,827.5
|
26.7
|
437.7
|
1,988.2
|
22.9
|
404.8
|
|
2004
|
2,076.9
|
25.3
|
473.0
|
2,209.3
|
22.9
|
449.0
|
|
2005
|
1,905.0
|
25.3
|
438.6
|
1,896.7
|
22.9
|
385.7
|
|
2006
|
1,493.2
|
25.9
|
352.1
|
1,901.9
|
22.3
|
376.9
|
|
2007
|
1,489.7
|
27.2
|
377.6
|
2,123.8
|
21.9
|
413.2
|
|
2008
|
1,469.7
|
27.2
|
373.1
|
1,872.0
|
22.2
|
367.6
|
|
2009
|
978.5
|
28.3
|
258.8
|
1,630.9
|
21.7
|
317.3
|
|
2010
|
697.0
|
27.9
|
182.2
|
1,203.9
|
21.4
|
228.9
|
|
2011
|
1,669.3
|
26.4
|
408.4
|
1,945.1
|
22.4
|
388.0
|
|
2012
|
1,949.9
|
27.4
|
492.8
|
2,331.7
|
22.7
|
461.3
|
|
2013
|
1,922.1
|
27.1
|
480.3
|
2,308.0
|
23.5
|
481.6
|
|
2014
|
1,953.5
|
25.4
|
456.1
|
2,479.8
|
23.4
|
516.0
|
|
2015
|
1,925.7
|
26.1
|
461.7
|
2,525.9
|
22.9
|
515.0
|
|
2016
|
2,071.8
|
26.0
|
489.5
|
2,371.4
|
23.1
|
487.6
|
|
2017
|
2,329.4
|
23.7
|
492.4
|
1,816.8
|
23.2
|
371.6
|
|
2018
|
2,521.3
|
24.8
|
561.9
|
1,811.8
|
22.9
|
362.8
|
|
2019
|
2,666.6
|
23.8
|
569.2
|
1,182.8
|
22.5
|
234.0
|
|
2020
|
2,358.3
|
24.2
|
503.0* / 518**
|
277.2
|
22.4
|
54.0
|
|
2021
|
2,533.5
|
26.4
|
598.7* / 614**
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
2022
|
2,928
|
25.3
|
664* / 680**
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
2023
|
2,795
|
24.3
|
584* / 601**
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
2024
|
3,247
|
26.7
|
786* / 802**
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
1. Feed to the Súria processing plant included ore from both Súria mine and Cabanasses mine up to 2006 (production from the Súria mine ceased in 2006. From 2006
onwards, all production from Súria mine was transferred to Cabanasses);
2. The 2018, 2019 and 2020 figures include some ore transported from Vilafruns to Súria plant for processing;
3. From mid-2020 production from Vilafruns and the Sallent processing plant ceased;
4. Product statistics for the Súria processing plant prior to 2020 exclude white potash production;
5. Product statistics for the Súria processing plant for 2020-2022: *Excluding white potash production, **Including white potash production.
|
||||||
| 1.4 |
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
| • |
Hangingwall package (90 m) of carnallite and halite;
|
| • |
Mine package (15 m) of halite and potash;
|
| • |
Footwall package of:
|
| o |
Massive halite (100 - 500 m);
|
| o |
Semi-massive halite in the upper 20 m;
|
| • |
Marker horizon of basal anhydrite (5 m).
|
| • |
Seam B: Average thickness at Cabanasses is 2.3 m, compared with an average thickness of 1 - 1.5 m at Vilafruns. Average KCl grade at Cabanasses is 42% KCl and 45% KCl at Vilafruns.
|
| • |
Seam A: Average thickness of Seam A at Cabanasses is 4 – 5 m. In the northern part of the Vilafruns deposit, the average thickness of the seam is 5.5 m while in the southern part
the average thickness reduces to 2.4 – 3.5 m. Average KCl grade at Cabanasses is 22 – 23 % KCl. In the northern part of the Vilafruns deposit, the average grade is 29 % KCl while in the southern part the average grade reduces to 22 – 23 %
KCl.
|
| 1.5 |
Exploration
|
| 1.6 |
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
| 1.7 |
Data Verification
|
| • |
Statistical comparison of KCl assays by drilling year (underground drilling);
|
| • |
Review of 2021 re-assaying programme of historical surface drillhole samples; and
|
| • |
A review of the drillhole databases.
|
| 1.8 |
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
| 1.9 |
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
|
Table 1.2: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Cabanasses and Vilafruns Mines
– December 31, 2024
|
||||||
|
Classification
|
Cabanasses
|
Vilafruns
|
Total
|
|||
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
|
|
Measured
|
81.7
|
25.0
|
12.6
|
31.0
|
94.3
|
25.8
|
|
Indicated
|
53.8
|
23.6
|
9.4
|
32.1
|
63.2
|
24.9
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
135.5
|
24.5
|
22.0
|
31.5
|
157.5
|
25.5
|
|
Inferred
|
242.6
|
27.4
|
30.7
|
28.9
|
273.3
|
27.6
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference of Mineral Resources is on an in-situ basis. Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 10% KCl and a minimum seam thickness of 0.5m.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density of 2.1 t/m3.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 86.5%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash price of $373/t FOB and a EURO:USD exchange rate of 0.91.
|
| 1.10 |
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
|
Table 1.3: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Cabanasses Mine – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grade
(% KCl)
|
|
Proven
|
35.9
|
25.2
|
|
Probable
|
59.4
|
25.8
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
95.3
|
25.6
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a cut-off grade of 19% KCl.
|
| 7. |
A minimum mining width of 5m was used.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 86.5%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a medium-long term potash price of $330/t FOB and a EURO:USD exchange rate of 0.91.
|
| 1.11 |
Mining Methods
|
| 1.12 |
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
| 1.13 |
Infrastructure
|
| 1.14 |
Market Studies
|
| 1.15 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
| 1.16 |
Capital, Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
| 1.17 |
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
| 1.18 |
Recommendations
|
| 1.18.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Continue the exploration drilling programmes.
|
| • |
Continue QA/QC programmes for all underground and surface drilling. Consider the use of external pulp duplicates as part of routine QA/QC samples.
|
| • |
Instances of drillhole intersections with economic KCl grades that are not included within the modelled potash seams (due to being off-section during geological interpretation)
should be reviewed by ICL Iberia.
|
| • |
Continue to monitor and review reconciliation of the resource model with production data (broken, stowed and hoisted material) with emphasis on reconciliation of mining losses at
Seam A.
|
| 1.18.2 |
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
| • |
Continue to optimise the mine planning process through the use of DeswikOps short-term planning analysis, focusing on providing a stable feed grade to the process plant.
|
| • |
Continue to progress teleremote loader operations from surface, to reduce exposure underground and increase operational efficiencies.
|
| • |
Continue spectral imaging studies to identify the white carnallite layer in the northern area of Cabanasses to assist with geotechnical characterisation.
|
| • |
Continue to develop on-going rock mechanics studies.
|
| 1.18.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
Continue on-going processing plant optimisation projects.
|
| • |
Continue work to investigate options to reduce the amount of salt for disposal including the potential for additional saleable salt products.
|
| 1.18.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Continue using and improving the environmental management system and maintain its ISO accredited standard.
|
| • |
Continue active engagement with local communities and stakeholders through formal and informal projects and outreach.
|
| • |
Continue to monitor and address brine run-off from the salt dumps.
|
| 2 |
| 2.1 |
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
| 2.2 |
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
| 2.3 |
Sources of Information
|
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report.
|
| • |
Documentation for licensing and permitting, published government reports and public information as included in Section 24 (References) of this report and cited in this report.
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report.
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources as listed below.
|
| • |
Mr. Carlos Saavedra, Technical Services and Planning Manager.
|
| • |
Mr. David Roca, Geological Modeler.
|
| • |
Mr. Carles Fàbrega, Mine Chief Geologist.
|
| • |
Mr. Francesc X. Caballero, Mine Manager
|
| • |
Mr. Angel García, Mine Planning Engineer.
|
| • |
Mr. Eric Lemus, Rock Mechanics Manager.
|
| • |
Mr. Avi Bovlil, Process Engineering Manager.
|
| • |
Mr. Christian Sánchez, Environment, Health and Safety, and Quality Manager.
|
| • |
Mr. Lluis Fàbrega, Environment Manager.
|
| • |
Ms. Sara Gordon, Head of Business Finance.
|
| • |
Ms. Maria Ángeles Reyes, Finance Director.
|
| • |
Mr. Meir Berger, CFO Potash Division.
|
| 2.4 |
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
| 2.5 |
Forward-Looking Statements
|
| 2.6 |
Units and Abbreviations
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
°C
|
Degrees Celsius
|
|
2D
|
Two-dimensional
|
|
3D
|
Three-dimensional
|
|
AA
|
Atomic Absorption
|
|
AAS
|
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
|
|
AGI
|
American Geologic Institute
|
|
Al2O3
|
Aluminium Oxide
|
|
BAT
|
Best Available Technology or Best Available Techniques
|
|
bhp
|
Brake Horse Power
|
|
BOT
|
Build-Operate-Transfer
|
|
Ca2+
|
Calcium ions
|
|
CaCl2
|
Calcium chloride
|
|
CaO
|
Calcium Oxide
|
|
Cd
|
Cadmium
|
|
CEMS
|
Constant Emissions Monitoring Systems
|
|
CO2
|
Carbon dioxide
|
|
COG
|
Cut-off Grade
|
|
CORS
|
Continuously Operating Reference Station
|
|
CRM
|
Certified Reference Materials
|
|
Datamine
|
3D geological modelling, mine design and production planning software
|
|
EA
|
Environmental Assessment
|
|
EHS&S
|
Environment, Health, Safety and Sustainability
|
|
EIA
|
Environmental Impact Assessment
|
|
EIS
|
Environmental Impact Statement
|
|
EMS
|
Environmental Management System
|
|
EPR
|
Environmental Permitting Regulations
|
|
ESG
|
Economic and Environmental, Social, Governance
|
|
ESIA
|
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
|
|
F
|
Florine
|
|
Fe
|
Iron
|
|
Fe2O3
|
Iron Oxide or ferric oxide
|
|
FOB
|
Free on Board / Freight on Board
|
|
FS
|
Feasibility Study
|
|
GHG
|
Greenhouse Gas
|
|
GIS
|
Geographical Information Services
|
|
GPS
|
Global Positioning System
|
|
GRI
|
Global Reporting Initiative
|
|
GWh
|
Gigawatt hour
|
|
H&S
|
Health and Safety
|
|
Ha
|
Hectare (10,000m2)
|
|
HFO
|
Heavy Fuel Oil
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
HQ
|
63.5 mm diameter drill core
|
|
hr
|
Hour/s
|
|
ICL
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
ID
|
Identification (number or reference)
|
|
IPPC
|
Integrated Pollution Prevention Control
|
|
K
|
Potassium
|
|
K2O
|
Potassium oxide
|
|
kV
|
Kilovolt
|
|
kW
|
Kilowatt
|
|
kWh
|
Kilowatt hour
|
|
kWh/t
|
Kilowatt hour per tonne
|
|
LFO
|
Light Fuel Oil
|
|
LIMS
|
Laboratory Information Management System
|
|
LOM
|
Life of Mine
|
|
LTA
|
Lost Time Analysis
|
|
M
|
Million(s)
|
|
Ma
|
Million years ago
|
|
MAPGIS
|
GIS Mapping Software
|
|
mbsl
|
Metres below sea level
|
|
MgCl2
|
Magnesium chloride
|
|
MgO
|
Magnesium Oxide
|
|
MOP
|
Muriate of potash
|
|
MRMR
|
Mining Rock Mass Rating
|
|
Mtpa
|
Million tonnes per annum
|
|
MW
|
Megawatt
|
|
MWh
|
Megawatt hour
|
|
NaCl
|
Sodium Chloride (salt)
|
|
NQ
|
47.6 mm diameter drill core
|
|
OEE
|
Overall Equipment Effectiveness
|
|
Pa
|
Pascal (measurement of vacuum gas pressure)
|
|
PFS
|
Prefeasibility Study
|
|
ppm
|
parts per million
|
|
QA/QC
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
|
QMS
|
Quality Management System
|
|
QP
|
Qualified Person
|
|
RMR
|
Rock Mass Rating
|
|
ROM
|
Run of Mine
|
|
rpm
|
revolutions per minute
|
|
SEC
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
SiO2
|
Silicon Dioxide
|
|
SLR
|
SLR Consulting Limited
|
|
SRM
|
Standard Reference Materials
|
|
t
|
Tonne metric unit of mass (1,000kg or 2,204.6 lb)
|
|
t/a or tpa
|
Tonnes per annum
|
|
t/d or tpd
|
Tonnes per day
|
|
t/h or tph
|
Tonnes per hour
|
|
TSF
|
Tailings Storage Facility
|
|
TOC
|
Total Organic Carbon
|
|
TRS
|
(S-K 1300) Technical Report Summary
|
|
UTM
|
Universal Transverse Mercator
|
|
Vulcan
|
3D geological modelling, mine design and production planning software
|
|
WAI
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
|
XRD
|
X-ray Diffraction
|
|
XRF
|
X-ray Fluorescence
|
| 3 |


| 3.1 |
Tenure
|

| 3.2 |
Royalties and Other Payments
|
| 3.3 |
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
| 4 |
| 4.1 |
Accessibility
|
| 4.2 |
Climate
|
| 4.3 |
Local Resources
|
| 4.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
Cabanasses underground (room and pillar) mine including decline and conveyor, shafts and vent shafts;
|
| • |
Mineral processing plant including crushing, grinding and flotation;
|
| • |
High purity pharmaceutical salt plant;
|
| • |
Waste dump consisting of salt and comprises two areas: historical dump area (unlined) and historical dump area (lined);
|
| • |
Water treatment facility including surface drains and catch pond to collect and process surface run-off water and underflow water from the new dump area;
|
| • |
Additional water treatment facility at the Cardener River to collect and process underflow brine (generated by the historical dump area); and
|
| • |
Site offices, laboratory, stores and maintenance workshops.
|
| • |
Rail load out and rail line.
|
| • |
Port facilities at Barcelona port.
|

| • |
Vilafruns underground (room and pillar) mine including decline, shafts and vent shafts.
|
| • |
Mineral processing plant including grinding and flotation.
|
| • |
Waste dumps consisting of salt and include a main dump termed Cogulló (partially lined), a historical dump (unlined) termed Botjosa that is under restoration, and a restored dump.
|
| • |
Water treatment facility including surface drains and catch pond to collect and process surface run-off water and underflow water from the lined dump area.
|
| • |
Additional water treatment facility to collect and process underflow brine (generated by the unlined dumps).
|
| • |
Site offices, stores and maintenance workshops.
|
| • |
Rail load out and rail line.
|
| • |
Port facilities at Barcelona port.
|

| 4.5 |
Physiography
|
| 5 |
| 5.1 |
Ownership, Development and Exploration History
|
| 5.2 |
Production History
|
|
Table 5.1: Summary of Production History
|
||||||
|
Year
|
Súria Processing Plant
|
Sallent Processing Plant
|
||||
|
Ore Hoisted
(kt)
|
Head Grade KCl (%)
|
Product
(kt)
|
Ore Hoisted
(kt)
|
Head Grade KCl (%)
|
Product
(kt)
|
|
|
1995
|
2,206.7
|
24.6
|
486.8
|
1,976.5
|
22.5
|
383.7
|
|
1996
|
2,179.7
|
24.4
|
455.8
|
2,647.8
|
21.9
|
468.6
|
|
1997
|
2,271.7
|
23.7
|
469.4
|
2,837.9
|
21.4
|
513.4
|
|
1998
|
1,937.6
|
22.5
|
373.4
|
2,519.5
|
20.2
|
431.1
|
|
1999
|
2,108.4
|
22.0
|
390.2
|
2,820.6
|
20.8
|
499.7
|
|
2000
|
2,189.0
|
22.8
|
428.5
|
2,571.7
|
20.0
|
441.5
|
|
2001
|
1,741.3
|
26.1
|
396.7
|
1,923.9
|
23.2
|
388.2
|
|
2002
|
1,526.6
|
28.0
|
382.6
|
1,420.1
|
23.5
|
295.2
|
|
2003
|
1,827.5
|
26.7
|
437.7
|
1,988.2
|
22.9
|
404.8
|
|
2004
|
2,076.9
|
25.3
|
473.0
|
2,209.3
|
22.9
|
449.0
|
|
2005
|
1,905.0
|
25.3
|
438.6
|
1,896.7
|
22.9
|
385.7
|
|
2006
|
1,493.2
|
25.9
|
352.1
|
1,901.9
|
22.3
|
376.9
|
|
2007
|
1,489.7
|
27.2
|
377.6
|
2,123.8
|
21.9
|
413.2
|
|
2008
|
1,469.7
|
27.2
|
373.1
|
1,872.0
|
22.2
|
367.6
|
|
2009
|
978.5
|
28.3
|
258.8
|
1,630.9
|
21.7
|
317.3
|
|
2010
|
697.0
|
27.9
|
182.2
|
1,203.9
|
21.4
|
228.9
|
|
2011
|
1,669.3
|
26.4
|
408.4
|
1,945.1
|
22.4
|
388.0
|
|
2012
|
1,949.9
|
27.4
|
492.8
|
2,331.7
|
22.7
|
461.3
|
|
2013
|
1,922.1
|
27.1
|
480.3
|
2,308.0
|
23.5
|
481.6
|
|
2014
|
1,953.5
|
25.4
|
456.1
|
2,479.8
|
23.4
|
516.0
|
|
2015
|
1,925.7
|
26.1
|
461.7
|
2,525.9
|
22.9
|
515.0
|
|
2016
|
2,071.8
|
26.0
|
489.5
|
2,371.4
|
23.1
|
487.6
|
|
2017
|
2,329.4
|
23.7
|
492.4
|
1,816.8
|
23.2
|
371.6
|
|
2018
|
2,521.3
|
24.8
|
561.9
|
1,811.8
|
22.9
|
362.8
|
|
2019
|
2,666.6
|
23.8
|
569.2
|
1,182.8
|
22.5
|
234.0
|
|
2020
|
2,358.3
|
24.2
|
503.0* / 518**
|
277.2
|
22.4
|
54.0
|
|
2021
|
2,533.5
|
26.4
|
598.7* / 614**
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
2022
|
2,928
|
25.3
|
664* / 680**
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
2023
|
2,795
|
24.3
|
584* / 601**
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
2024
|
3,247
|
26.7
|
786* / 802**
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
1. Feed to the Súria processing plant included ore from both Súria mine and Cabanasses mine up to 2006 (production from the Súria mine ceased in 2006. From 2006
onwards, all production from Súria mine was transferred to Cabanasses);
2. The 2018, 2019 and 2020 figures include some ore transported from Vilafruns to Súria plant for processing;
3. From mid-2020 production from Vilafruns and the Sallent processing plant ceased;
4. Product statistics for the Súria processing plant prior to 2020 exclude white potash production;
5. Product statistics for the Súria processing plant for 2020-2022: *Excluding white potash production, **Including white potash production.
|
||||||
| 6 |
| 6.1 |
Regional Geology
|



| 6.2 |
Local and Property Geology
|
| 6.2.1 |
Stratigraphy
|
| • |
Hangingwall package (90m) of carnallite and halite;
|
| • |
Mine package (15m) of halite and potash;
|
| • |
Footwall package of:
|
| o |
Massive halite (100-500m);
|
| o |
Semi-massive halite in the upper 20m;
|
| • |
Marker horizon of basal anhydrite (5m).
|

|
Table 6.1: Detailed Stratigraphic Column for Cabanasses Area
|
|||||
|
Epoch
|
Formation
|
Unit
|
Series
|
Description
|
Thickness
|
|
Oligocene
|
Solsona
|
U17
|
Upper Series
|
Sandstones, conglomerates, lutites and marls
|
Unknown
|
|
U16
|
Intermediate Series
|
Sandstones, lutites and marls
|
Unknown
|
||
|
U15
|
Transition Series
|
Red mudstone, sandstones and limestones
|
250-300m
|
||
|
Eocene
|
Artés
|
U14
|
Marker Horizon
|
Limestones
|
5m
|
|
U13
|
Súria Beds
|
Limonites and sandstones with interbedded limestones
|
150-200m
|
||
|
U12
|
Marker Horizon
|
Microconglomeritic sandstone
|
5m
|
||
|
U11b
|
Marker Horizon
|
Limestones - "Calizas del Castillo o del Tossal"
|
5m
|
||
|
U11a
|
Marker Horizon
|
Limestones - "Calizas del Mas Torquer"
|
5m
|
||
|
U10
|
"Capas de Súria"
|
Limonites and sandstones with interbedded limestones
|
100m
|
||
|
U9
|
Marker Horizon
|
Limestone - "Calizas del Cogullo"
|
5m
|
||
|
U8
|
"Capas de Súria"
|
Limonites and sandstones with interbedded limestones
|
150m
|
||
|
U7
|
Marker Horizon
|
Massive gypsum, lutite and halite - "Yesos de la Estacion"
|
20-50m
|
||
|
Castelltallat / Súria
|
U6
|
"Unidad Lacustre del Tordell"
|
Limonites, marls and layers of limestone
|
150-200m
|
|
|
Barbastro
|
U5
|
"Miembro Arcilloso-Evaporitico Superior"
|
Limonites and marls, centimetric layers of gypsum, halite, thin layers of limestone
|
30-40m
|
|
|
Cardona
|
U4
|
Hangingwall Package
|
Halite (with clay partings)
|
30-50m
|
|
|
U4
|
Carnallite interbedded with halite ("CAPA C")
|
5-20m
|
|||
|
U4
|
Halite
|
5-15m
|
|||
|
U4
|
Carnallite
|
3-7m
|
|||
|
U4
|
Mine Package
|
Transformada (altered carnallite)
|
1-2m
|
||
|
U3
|
Seam B ("CAPA B")
|
2-3m
|
|||
|
U3
|
Sal Entrados (middle halite)
|
3-6m
|
|||
|
U3
|
Seam A ("Capa A")
|
4-5m
|
|||
|
U2
|
Footwall Package
|
Semi-massive halite
|
10-20m
|
||
|
U2
|
Massive halite
|
100-500m
|
|||
|
U1
|
Marker Horizon
|
Basal Anhydrite
|
10-15m
|
||
|
Igualada
|
U0
|
"Margas de Igualada"
|
Grey-blue marls with beds of limestone
|
>1000m
|
|


| 6.2.2 |
Structural Geology
|





| 6.3 |
Mineralisation
|
| • |
Seam B:
|
| o |
The average thickness of Seam B (including the Transformada zone [see below for description]) at Cabanasses is 2.3 m, compared with an average thickness of 1 - 1.5 m at Vilafruns;
|
| o |
The average KCl grade at Cabanasses is 42% KCl and 45% KCl at Vilafruns.
|
| • |
Seam A:
|
| o |
The average thickness of Seam A at Cabanasses is 4 – 5 m. In the northern part of the Vilafruns, the average thickness of the seam is 5.5 m while in the southern part the average
thickness reduces to 2.4 – 3.5 m.
|
| o |
The average KCl grade at Cabanasses is 22 – 23 % KCl. In the northern part of Vilafruns, the average grade is 29 % KCl while in the southern part the average grade reduces to 22 –
23 % KCl.
|
| 6.4 |
Deposit Type
|
| 7 |
| 7.1 |
Seismic Surveys
|

| 7.2 |
Drilling
|
|
Table 7.1: Summary of Cabanasses and Vilafruns Drillholes
|
||||||
|
Year
|
Cabanasses
|
Vilafruns
|
Total
|
|||
|
Drillholes
|
Length (m)
|
Drillholes
|
Length (m)
|
Drillholes
|
Length (m)
|
|
|
Underground Drillholes
|
||||||
|
2002
|
-
|
-
|
13
|
3,417
|
13
|
3,417
|
|
2003
|
10
|
2,475
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
2,475
|
|
2004
|
63
|
21,717
|
6
|
529
|
69
|
22,246
|
|
2005
|
81
|
23,195
|
-
|
-
|
81
|
23,195
|
|
2006
|
60
|
16,612
|
56
|
15,165
|
116
|
31,777
|
|
2007
|
38
|
11,763
|
40
|
11,793
|
78
|
23,556
|
|
2008
|
36
|
10,050
|
45
|
14,829
|
81
|
24,879
|
|
2009
|
74
|
22,864
|
46
|
14,844
|
120
|
37,708
|
|
2010
|
129
|
37,887
|
28
|
7,224
|
157
|
45,111
|
|
2011
|
80
|
26,294
|
22
|
6,399
|
102
|
32,693
|
|
2012
|
115
|
36,965
|
-
|
-
|
115
|
36,965
|
|
2013
|
134
|
49,572
|
13
|
2,289
|
147
|
51,861
|
|
2014
|
112
|
35,671
|
20
|
3,978
|
132
|
39,649
|
|
2015
|
145
|
45,779
|
62
|
21,459
|
207
|
67,238
|
|
2016
|
251
|
83,941
|
74
|
29,793
|
325
|
113,734
|
|
2017
|
256
|
88,548
|
-
|
-
|
256
|
88,548
|
|
2018
|
262
|
90,166
|
-
|
-
|
262
|
90,166
|
|
2019
|
252
|
92,693
|
-
|
-
|
252
|
92,693
|
|
2020
|
144
|
56,401
|
-
|
-
|
144
|
56,401
|
|
2021
|
91
|
35,173
|
-
|
-
|
91
|
35,173
|
|
2022
|
73
|
32,766
|
-
|
-
|
73
|
32,766
|
|
2023
|
115
|
42,301
|
-
|
-
|
115
|
42,301
|
|
2024
|
97
|
40,398
|
-
|
-
|
97
|
40,398
|
|
Sub-Total
|
2,618
|
903,231
|
425
|
131,719
|
3,043
|
1,034,950
|
|
Surface Drillholes
|
||||||
|
1963
|
1
|
999
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
999
|
|
1991
|
4
|
3,406
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
3,406
|
|
2010
|
1
|
1,258
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1,258
|
|
2011
|
3
|
3,525
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
3,525
|
|
2018
|
1
|
966
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
966
|
|
2021
|
2
|
1,910
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
1,910
|
|
2022
|
3
|
2,760
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
2,760
|
|
Sub-Total
|
15
|
14,824
|
-
|
-
|
15
|
14,824
|
|
Grand Total
|
2,633
|
918,055
|
425
|
131,719
|
3,058
|
1,049,774
|


| 7.2.1 |
Underground Drilling
|

| 7.2.2 |
Surface Drilling
|
| 7.2.3 |
Effects of Crystallisation of Drilling Brine on Drill Core
|

| 7.2.4 |
Adjustment of KCl Grade for Carnallite Content and Dissolution of Drillcore
|
| • |
Instances where the drilling brine was not sufficiently saturated, results in differential dissolution of the drillcore, whereby, sylvinite is partially dissolved and a higher
proportion of halite remains;
|
| • |
In cases of differential dissolution, the remaining drillcore diameter is measured by a geologist using a calliper and the proportion of sylvinite that has been dissolved is
estimated and a Leach Factor (LF) is recorded in the drillhole database to reflect this;
|
| • |
The LF is used to correct the KCl values to account for the missing proportion of sylvinite from the drillcore. An LF value of 1 means no dissolution of drill core has occurred and
no adjustment is made. LF values of >1 reflect the proportion of dissolution and the resulting KClcorr value will be higher than the KCl (total) value.
|
|
a) Cabanasses Seam A
![]() |
b) Cabanasses Seam B (including Transformada)
![]() |
|
Table 7.2: Summary Statistical Analysis of KCl (%) and KClcorr at Cabanasses
|
|||||||
|
Year
|
№ of Samples
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
Seam A
|
|||||||
|
KCl
|
15,329
|
0
|
90.9
|
24.5
|
265.8
|
16.3
|
0.66
|
|
KClcorr
|
15,329
|
0
|
91.2
|
24.7
|
274.4
|
16.6
|
0.67
|
|
Seam B (including Transformada Zone)
|
|||||||
|
KCl
|
6,432
|
0
|
94.2
|
39.2
|
198.8
|
14.1
|
0.36
|
|
KClcorr
|
6,432
|
0
|
93.9
|
39.4
|
204.3
|
14.3
|
0.36
|
| 7.2.5 |
Calculation of True Thickness and Grade
|
| 7.2.6 |
Drill Plans and Sections
|
| 7.3 |
QP Opinion
|
|
a) Plan View of Cross Section Profiles C097 and C116 at Cabanasses
![]() |
|
b) Geological Cross Sections of Profiles C097 and C116 at Cabanasses
![]() |
|
a) Plan View of Cross Section Profiles V031 and V022 at Vilafruns
![]() |
|
b) Geological Cross Sections of Profiles V031 and V022 at Vilafruns
![]() |
| 8 |
| 8.1 |
Underground Drill Samples
|
| 8.1.1 |
Core Logging
|
| 8.1.2 |
Core Sampling
|
| 8.1.3 |
Sample Preparation
|

| 8.1.4 |
Sample Analysis
|
| 8.2 |
Surface Drill Samples
|
| 8.2.1 |
Core Logging
|
| 8.2.2 |
Core Sampling
|
| 8.2.3 |
Sample Preparation
|
| • |
Drying (ALS code: DRY-22);
|
| • |
Crushing to better than 70% of the sample passing 2mm (ALS code: CRU-31);
|
| • |
Riffle splitting to produce a sample weight of 250g (ALS code: SPL-21); and
|
| • |
Pulverising to better than 85% of the sample passing 75 microns (ALS code: PUL-31).
|
| 8.2.4 |
Sample Analysis
|
| 8.3 |
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
|
| 8.3.1 |
QA/QC for 2019 – 2021 Drilling Campaigns
|


| 8.3.2 |
QA/QC for Drilling Campaigns from 2021 Onwards
|
|
Table 8.1: SRM Samples Used by Cabanasses Laboratory (2022-2024)
|
|||
|
SRM Name
|
Description
|
Target KCl (%)
|
Standard Deviation
|
|
Standard 1
|
High Grade
|
42.90
|
1.22
|
|
Standard 2
|
Medium Grade
|
21.09
|
0.79
|
|
Standard 3
|
Low Grade
|
14.00
|
0.64
|
|
Table 8.2: Summary of SRM Analysis (2022 to 2024) – Cabanasses Laboratory
|
||||||||
|
SRM Name
|
Target Grade
KCl (%) |
Number
SRM Samples |
Mean KCl Grade of Analysed SRM Samples (%)
|
Bias Against Target Grade (%)
|
Samples Outside ± 2
Standard Deviations |
Samples Outside ± 3
Standard Deviations |
||
|
Number
Samples |
%
Samples |
Number
Samples |
%
Samples |
|||||
|
Standard 1
|
42.90
|
23
|
41.56
|
-3.1
|
4
|
17.4
|
1
|
4.3
|
|
Standard 2
|
21.09
|
22
|
20.63
|
-2.2
|
5
|
22.7
|
1
|
4.5
|
|
Standard 3
|
14.00
|
14
|
13.73
|
-1.9
|
2
|
9.1
|
0
|
0
|

|
Table 8.3: Summary of Blank Material Assaying
|
||||||
|
Year
|
Element
|
Number of
Blank Samples |
Samples > 3% KCl
|
Samples > 5% KCl
|
||
|
Number Samples
|
% Samples
|
Number Samples
|
% Samples
|
|||
|
2021
|
KCl
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2022
|
KCl
|
30
|
1
|
3.3
|
0
|
0
|
|
2023
|
KCl
|
22
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2024
|
KCl
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|

|
Table 8.4: Summary of Coarse Duplicates for 2022 to 2024 Exploration Drilling (Cabanasses Laboratory)
|
|||||||
|
Element
|
Number
of Pairs
|
Mean Primary Samples
|
Mean Duplicate Samples
|
CV Primary Samples
|
CV Duplicate Samples
|
Correlation Coefficient
|
% of Pairs <15% HARD
|
|
KCl
|
30
|
38.17
|
37.46
|
0.41
|
0.41
|
0.99
|
96.7
|

|
Table 8.5: Summary of Coarse Duplicates for 2022 to 2024 Exploration Drilling (ALS Laboratory)
|
|||||||
|
Element
|
Number
of Pairs
|
Mean Primary Samples
|
Mean Duplicate Samples
|
CV Primary Samples
|
CV Duplicate Samples
|
Correlation Coefficient
|
% of Pairs <15% HARD
|
|
KCl
|
33
|
33.13
|
31.84
|
0.68
|
0.68
|
0.99
|
97.0
|

|
Table 8.6: Summary of Pulp Duplicates Results for 2022 to 2024 Exploration Programmes (Cabanasses Laboratory)
|
|||||||
|
Element
|
Number
of Pairs
|
Mean Primary Samples
|
Mean Duplicate Samples
|
CV Primary Samples
|
CV Duplicate Samples
|
Correlation Coefficient
|
% of Pairs <10% HARD
|
|
KCl
|
31
|
34.45
|
34.24
|
0.45
|
0.45
|
1.00
|
96.8
|

|
Table 8.7: Summary of Pulp Duplicate Results for 2022 to 2024 Exploration Programmes (ALS Laboratory)
|
|||||||
|
Element
|
Number
of Pairs
|
Mean Primary Samples
|
Mean Duplicate Samples
|
CV Primary Samples
|
CV Duplicate Samples
|
Correlation Coefficient
|
% of Pairs <10% HARD
|
|
KCl
|
44
|
32.53
|
31.66
|
0.78
|
0.80
|
1.00
|
90.9
|

| 8.3.3 |
Density Determination
|
|
Table 8.8: Density Measurements by Lithology
|
|||||||||
|
ANH
|
SM
|
SMS
|
A
|
S2
|
B
|
CAR
|
TR
|
ST
|
|
|
Number
|
10
|
124
|
50
|
259
|
44
|
115
|
36
|
65
|
32
|
|
Minimum
|
2.89
|
2.12
|
2.15
|
1.63
|
2.14
|
1.95
|
1.60
|
1.97
|
2.15
|
|
Maximum
|
2.94
|
2.21
|
2.27
|
2.49
|
2.19
|
2.18
|
1.82
|
2.18
|
2.20
|
|
Average
|
2.92
|
2.17
|
2.17
|
2.09
|
2.17
|
2.07
|
1.67
|
2.08
|
2.17
|
|
Notes:
NH (basal anhydrite); SM (lower massive halite); SMS (lower semi-massive halite); A (Seam A); S2 sal entredos (middle halite); B (Seam B); CAR (carnallite); TR
(transformada); ST (upper halite)
|
|||||||||
| 8.3.4 |
Sample Security and Chain of Custody
|
| • |
Underground drillhole samples are transported as whole core within sealed heavy duty polythene bags with internal and external tags. The whole core samples are used for sample
preparation; and
|
| • |
Surface drillhole samples are transported to the Vilafruns facility in sealed core boxes. Once photographed, logged and half core samples are taken, the remaining half core from the
surface drillholes is stored at the Manresa core storage facility. Half core for the following surface drillholes (completed from 2010 onwards) are currently stored at Manresa: C1, C2bis, C3, C4bis, VS1bis, SAG1 to SAG 5.
|
| 8.4 |
QP Opinion
|
| 9 |
| 9.1 |
Site Visits
|
| 9.2 |
Drillhole Database
|
| • |
Statistical comparison of KCl assays by drilling year (underground drilling);
|
| • |
Review of 2021 re-assaying programme of historical surface drillhole samples; and
|
| • |
A review of the drillhole databases.
|
| 9.2.1 |
Statistical Comparison of KCl Assays by Drilling Year
|
|
Table 9.1: Summary Statistical Analysis for KCl (%) at Cabanasses Seam A
|
|||||||
|
Year
|
№ of Samples
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
2003
|
29
|
2.8
|
76.9
|
25.5
|
350
|
18.7
|
0.73
|
|
2004
|
875
|
0.8
|
87.1
|
25.7
|
339
|
18.4
|
0.72
|
|
2005
|
848
|
1.2
|
88.9
|
29.2
|
349
|
18.7
|
0.64
|
|
2006
|
430
|
0.8
|
85.9
|
24.0
|
273
|
16.5
|
0.69
|
|
2007
|
482
|
1.1
|
89.4
|
25.1
|
335
|
18.3
|
0.73
|
|
2008
|
289
|
0.6
|
85.1
|
24.6
|
283
|
16.8
|
0.68
|
|
2009
|
561
|
0.6
|
87.3
|
24.3
|
244
|
15.6
|
0.64
|
|
2010
|
697
|
0.6
|
78.1
|
25.0
|
217
|
14.7
|
0.59
|
|
2011
|
563
|
0.9
|
72.5
|
25.9
|
207
|
14.4
|
0.56
|
|
2012
|
891
|
0.9
|
85.4
|
25.8
|
237
|
15.4
|
0.60
|
|
2013
|
965
|
0.5
|
90.9
|
22.1
|
235
|
15.3
|
0.69
|
|
2014
|
673
|
0.7
|
89.0
|
24.5
|
259
|
16.1
|
0.66
|
|
2015
|
857
|
0.0
|
79.0
|
24.8
|
256
|
16.0
|
0.64
|
|
2016
|
1,162
|
0.0
|
86.0
|
23.7
|
234
|
15.3
|
0.64
|
|
2017
|
1,235
|
0.1
|
87.2
|
23.8
|
262
|
16.2
|
0.68
|
|
2018
|
1,074
|
0.0
|
80.2
|
23.3
|
231
|
15.2
|
0.65
|
|
2019
|
1,211
|
0.5
|
84.1
|
23.8
|
248
|
15.7
|
0.66
|
|
2020
|
602
|
0.6
|
89.6
|
23.6
|
271
|
16.5
|
0.70
|
|
2021
|
456
|
0.0
|
87.3
|
25.4
|
325
|
18.0
|
0.71
|
|
2022
|
372
|
1.0
|
87.2
|
26.0
|
290
|
17.0
|
0.65
|
|
2023
|
531
|
0.8
|
70.8
|
25.3
|
245
|
15.7
|
0.62
|
|
2024
|
516
|
0.0
|
69.2
|
21.7
|
281
|
16.8
|
0.77
|
|
Total
|
15,319
|
0.5
|
84.2
|
24.5
|
263.5
|
16.2
|
0.7
|
|
a) Cumulative Distribution Plot
![]() |
b) Mean KCl Grade
![]() |
|
Table 9.2: Summary Statistical Analysis for KCl (%) at Cabanasses Seam B
|
|||||||
|
Year
|
№ of Samples
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
2003
|
7
|
22.8
|
46.0
|
36.3
|
62
|
7.9
|
0.22
|
|
2004
|
300
|
1.3
|
75.7
|
39.6
|
183
|
13.5
|
0.34
|
|
2005
|
443
|
4.2
|
94.2
|
43.5
|
187
|
13.7
|
0.31
|
|
2006
|
214
|
2.2
|
78.9
|
38.0
|
119
|
10.9
|
0.29
|
|
2007
|
233
|
3.3
|
86.2
|
37.5
|
217
|
14.7
|
0.39
|
|
2008
|
126
|
2.8
|
77.9
|
37.0
|
133
|
11.6
|
0.31
|
|
2009
|
245
|
1.9
|
88.0
|
39.9
|
163
|
12.8
|
0.32
|
|
2010
|
398
|
0.7
|
86.8
|
40.5
|
183
|
13.5
|
0.33
|
|
2011
|
283
|
0.4
|
93.0
|
42.0
|
203
|
14.3
|
0.34
|
|
2012
|
324
|
0.8
|
85.2
|
42.3
|
139
|
11.8
|
0.28
|
|
2013
|
381
|
0.9
|
85.2
|
35.9
|
311
|
17.6
|
0.49
|
|
2014
|
236
|
1.2
|
69.1
|
36.3
|
184
|
13.6
|
0.37
|
|
2015
|
378
|
0.0
|
79.4
|
38.7
|
195
|
14.0
|
0.36
|
|
2016
|
464
|
0.4
|
78.6
|
39.6
|
218
|
14.7
|
0.37
|
|
2017
|
442
|
0.7
|
65.3
|
40.2
|
134
|
11.6
|
0.29
|
|
2018
|
503
|
0.1
|
68.6
|
38.0
|
174
|
13.2
|
0.35
|
|
2019
|
482
|
1.1
|
90.4
|
41.2
|
139
|
11.8
|
0.29
|
|
2020
|
253
|
1.1
|
70.5
|
38.3
|
234
|
15.3
|
0.40
|
|
2021
|
150
|
0.4
|
70.6
|
35.1
|
326
|
18.1
|
0.51
|
|
2022
|
144
|
2.4
|
61.0
|
38.7
|
166
|
12.9
|
0.33
|
|
2023
|
216
|
1.4
|
75.8
|
38.4
|
187
|
13.7
|
0.36
|
|
2024
|
204
|
0.0
|
68.5
|
33.1
|
360
|
19.0
|
0.57
|
|
Total
|
6,426
|
1.2
|
79.6
|
39.2
|
193.3
|
13.8
|
0.4
|
|
a) Cumulative Distribution
![]() |
b) Mean KCl Grade Plot
![]() |
|
Table 9.3: Summary Statistical Analysis for KCl (%) at Cabanasses Transformada Zone
|
|||||||
|
Year
|
№ of Samples
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
2003
|
14
|
2.9
|
46.3
|
36.5
|
139
|
11.8
|
0.32
|
|
2004
|
231
|
1.2
|
79.4
|
40.7
|
117
|
10.8
|
0.27
|
|
2005
|
205
|
1.1
|
71.2
|
40.1
|
174
|
13.2
|
0.33
|
|
2006
|
107
|
16.0
|
56.0
|
37.2
|
69
|
8.3
|
0.22
|
|
2007
|
99
|
2.2
|
55.9
|
30.8
|
164
|
12.8
|
0.42
|
|
2008
|
62
|
10.0
|
53.0
|
37.6
|
68
|
8.2
|
0.22
|
|
2009
|
111
|
1.8
|
85.1
|
42.0
|
105
|
10.3
|
0.24
|
|
2010
|
158
|
3.0
|
63.2
|
42.3
|
66
|
8.1
|
0.19
|
|
2011
|
95
|
2.0
|
56.6
|
41.1
|
114
|
10.7
|
0.26
|
|
2012
|
141
|
2.1
|
60.6
|
39.0
|
112
|
10.6
|
0.27
|
|
2013
|
236
|
2.9
|
64.1
|
36.9
|
157
|
12.5
|
0.34
|
|
2014
|
101
|
4.1
|
56.3
|
38.3
|
86
|
9.3
|
0.24
|
|
2015
|
132
|
3.0
|
57.7
|
40.5
|
78
|
8.8
|
0.22
|
|
2016
|
275
|
6.8
|
56.5
|
41.0
|
70
|
8.3
|
0.20
|
|
2017
|
223
|
7.2
|
56.9
|
39.0
|
86
|
9.2
|
0.24
|
|
2018
|
231
|
8.8
|
54.6
|
36.4
|
69
|
8.3
|
0.23
|
|
2019
|
253
|
3.1
|
67.2
|
38.2
|
102
|
10.1
|
0.26
|
|
2020
|
135
|
18.4
|
57.8
|
38.8
|
58
|
7.6
|
0.20
|
|
2021
|
83
|
0.0
|
53.3
|
34.9
|
127
|
11.3
|
0.32
|
|
2022
|
83
|
18.3
|
56.3
|
39.3
|
64
|
8.0
|
0.20
|
|
2023
|
104
|
10.3
|
56.5
|
38.0
|
75
|
8.7
|
0.23
|
|
2024
|
74
|
0.0
|
61.7
|
36.7
|
226
|
15.0
|
0.41
|
|
Total
|
3,153
|
5.4
|
62.0
|
38.8
|
103.2
|
10.0
|
0.3
|
|
a) Cumulative Distribution Plot
![]() |
b) Mean KCl Grade Plot
![]() |
| 9.2.2 |
Re-Assaying Programme of Surface Drilling Samples
|
| • |
C-2bis (2011)
|
| • |
C-3 (2011)
|
| • |
C-4bis (2011)
|
| • |
SAG1 (2021)
|
|
Table 9.4: Duplicate Analysis of Drillhole C-2Bis
|
|||||||||
|
Sample
|
From
(m)
|
To
(m)
|
Length
(m)
|
Lith
|
ICL Iberia
(AAS)
|
ALS (XRF)
|
Difference
|
||
|
KCl (%)
|
Duplicate
|
K2O
(%)
|
KCl
(%)
|
KCl (%)
|
|||||
|
C-2Bis/011
|
1116.50
|
1117.30
|
0.80
|
CAR
|
24.4
|
C2BIS-011-DUP
|
17.1
|
27.1
|
|
|
0.80
|
24.4
|
27.1
|
-2.7
|
||||||
|
C-2Bis/010
|
1117.30
|
1117.95
|
0.65
|
B
|
43.3
|
C2BIS-010-DUP
|
28.9
|
45.7
|
|
|
C-2Bis/009
|
1117.95
|
1118.65
|
0.70
|
B
|
34.9
|
C2BIS-009-DUP
|
23.6
|
37.4
|
|
|
1.35
|
38.9
|
41.4
|
-2.5
|
||||||
|
C-2Bis/008
|
1118.65
|
1120.20
|
1.55
|
S2
|
1.5
|
C2BIS-008-DUP
|
1.02
|
1.6
|
|
|
C-2Bis/007
|
1120.20
|
1121.40
|
1.20
|
S2
|
1.4
|
C2BIS-007-DUP
|
0.95
|
1.5
|
|
|
C-2Bis/006
|
1121.40
|
1122.60
|
1.20
|
S2
|
1.4
|
C2BIS-006-DUP
|
0.88
|
1.4
|
|
|
C-2Bis/005
|
1122.60
|
1123.85
|
1.25
|
S2
|
13.1
|
C2BIS-005-DUP
|
1.66
|
2.6
|
|
|
5.20
|
4.2
|
1.8
|
2.4
|
||||||
|
C-2Bis/004
|
1123.85
|
1124.70
|
0.85
|
Asup
|
41.4
|
C2BIS-004-DUP
|
5.66
|
9.0
|
|
|
C-2Bis/003
|
1124.70
|
1125.90
|
1.20
|
Asup
|
23.4
|
C2BIS-003-DUP
|
17.15
|
27.1
|
|
|
C-2Bis/002
|
1125.90
|
1126.20
|
0.30
|
S60
|
3.7
|
C2BIS-002-DUP
|
2.54
|
4.0
|
|
|
C-2Bis/001
|
1126.20
|
1127.10
|
0.90
|
A/CR
|
31.1
|
C2BIS-001-DUP
|
31
|
49.1
|
|
|
3.25
|
28.4
|
26.3
|
2.1
|
||||||
|
Note: Calculation of KCl from K2O based on empirical formula: KCl = K2O/0.6317
|
|||||||||
| • |
Seam B: overall grades of 38.9% KCl and 41.4% attained by ICL Iberia and ALS respectively; and
|
| • |
Seam A: overall grades of 28.4% KCl and 26.3% KCl attained by ICL Iberia and ALS, respectively.
|
|
Table 9.5: Duplicate Analysis of Drillhole C-3
|
|||||||||
|
Sample
|
From
(m)
|
To
(m)
|
Length
(m)
|
Lith
|
ICL Iberia
(AAS)
|
ALS (XRF)
|
Difference
|
||
|
KCl (%)
|
Duplicate
|
K2O
(%)
|
KCl
(%)
|
KCl (%)
|
|||||
|
C-3/010
|
1053.30
|
1056.15
|
2.85
|
CAR
|
20.8
|
C3-010-DUP
|
16.5
|
26.1
|
|
|
2.85
|
20.8
|
26.1
|
-5.3
|
||||||
|
C-3/009
|
1056.15
|
1056.80
|
0.65
|
B
|
44.4
|
C3-009-DUP
|
27.8
|
44.0
|
|
|
C-3/008
|
1056.80
|
1057.45
|
0.65
|
B
|
39.9
|
C3-008-DUP
|
25.6
|
40.5
|
|
|
1.30
|
42.1
|
42.3
|
-0.1
|
||||||
|
C-3/007
|
1057.45
|
1058.80
|
1.35
|
S2
|
1.5
|
C3-007-DUP
|
0.98
|
1.6
|
|
|
C-3/006
|
1058.80
|
1060.00
|
1.20
|
S2
|
1.7
|
C3-006-DUP
|
1.12
|
1.8
|
|
|
C-3/005
|
1060.00
|
1060.90
|
0.90
|
S2
|
1.5
|
C3-005-DUP
|
1.06
|
1.7
|
|
|
3.45
|
1.6
|
1.7
|
-0.1
|
||||||
|
C-3/004
|
1060.90
|
1061.70
|
0.80
|
Asup
|
31.4
|
C3-004-DUP
|
21.2
|
33.6
|
|
|
C-3/003
|
1061.70
|
1062.70
|
1.00
|
Asup
|
20.6
|
C3-003-DUP
|
13.8
|
21.8
|
|
|
C-3/002
|
1062.70
|
1063.10
|
0.40
|
S60
|
1.8
|
C3-002-DUP
|
1
|
1.6
|
|
|
C-3/001
|
1063.10
|
1063.80
|
0.70
|
A/CR
|
41.8
|
C3-001-DUP
|
27.5
|
43.5
|
|
|
2.90
|
26.1
|
27.5
|
-1.4
|
||||||
|
Note: Calculation of KCl from K2O based on empirical formula: KCl = K2O/0.6317
|
|||||||||
| • |
Seam B, overall grades of 42.1% KCl and 42.3% attained by ICL Iberia and ALS, respectively;
|
| • |
Seam A, overall grades of 16.0% KCl and 17.0% KCl attained by ICL Iberia and ALS, respectively.
|
|
Table 9.6: Duplicate Analysis of Drillhole C-4Bis
|
|||||||||
|
Sample
|
From
(m)
|
To
(m)
|
Length
(m)
|
Lith
|
ICL Iberia (AAS)
|
ALS (XRF)
|
Difference
|
||
|
KCl (%)
|
Duplicate
|
K2O
(%)
|
KCl
(%)
|
KCl (%)
|
|||||
|
C-4Bis01
|
574.15
|
578.50
|
4.35
|
T
|
40.6
|
C4BIS-001-DUP
|
27.2
|
43.1
|
|
|
C-4Bis02
|
578.50
|
580.70
|
2.20
|
ST
|
2.4
|
C4BIS-002-DUP
|
1.85
|
2.9
|
|
|
C-4Bis03
|
580.70
|
581.85
|
1.15
|
T+SAL
|
19.8
|
C4BIS-003-DUP
|
12.85
|
20.3
|
|
|
C-4Bis04
|
581.85
|
583.30
|
1.45
|
silvinita+Sal
|
31.1
|
C4BIS-004-DUP
|
20.5
|
32.5
|
|
|
C-4Bis05
|
583.30
|
585.90
|
2.60
|
Sal alterada
|
2.1
|
C4BIS-005-DUP
|
1.46
|
2.3
|
|
|
C-4Bis06
|
585.90
|
588.35
|
2.45
|
silvinita+Sal
|
29.1
|
C4BIS-006-DUP
|
19.55
|
30.9
|
|
|
14.20
|
23.0
|
24.4
|
-1.4
|
||||||
|
C-4Bis07
|
588.35
|
590.35
|
2.00
|
Sal
|
1.8
|
C4BIS-007-DUP
|
1.85
|
2.9
|
|
|
C-4Bis08
|
590.35
|
592.90
|
2.55
|
silvintia+Sal
|
8.2
|
C4BIS-008-DUP
|
5.68
|
9.0
|
|
|
C-4Bis09
|
592.90
|
593.70
|
0.80
|
Sal
|
2.1
|
C4BIS-009-DUP
|
1.18
|
1.9
|
|
|
C-4Bis10
|
593.70
|
596.50
|
2.80
|
silvinita+Sal
|
22.3
|
C4BIS-010-DUP
|
13.9
|
22.0
|
|
|
C-4Bis11
|
596.50
|
604.75
|
8.25
|
Sal
|
1.9
|
C4BIS-011-DUP
|
1.22
|
1.9
|
|
|
16.40
|
6.3
|
6.6
|
-0.2
|
||||||
|
C-4Bis12
|
604.75
|
607.45
|
2.70
|
silvinita+Sal
|
24.8
|
C4BIS-012-DUP
|
16.2
|
25.6
|
|
|
C-4Bis13
|
607.45
|
610.30
|
2.85
|
silvinita+Sal
|
34.5
|
C4BIS-013-DUP
|
23.1
|
36.6
|
|
|
C-4Bis14
|
610.30
|
613.55
|
3.25
|
Sal alterada
|
8.5
|
C4BIS-014-DUP
|
6.58
|
10.4
|
|
|
C-4Bis15
|
613.55
|
616.15
|
2.60
|
Sal alterada
|
4.4
|
C4BIS-015-DUP
|
2.98
|
4.7
|
|
|
C-4Bis16
|
616.15
|
619.45
|
3.30
|
Sal alterada
|
4.4
|
C4BIS-016-DUP
|
2.99
|
4.7
|
|
|
C-4Bis17
|
619.45
|
622.40
|
2.95
|
silvintia+Sal
|
21.2
|
C4BIS-017-DUP
|
13.85
|
21.9
|
|
|
17.65
|
16.0
|
17.0
|
-1.0
|
||||||
|
Note: Calculation of KCl from K2O based on empirical formula: KCl = K2O/0.6317
|
|||||||||
| • |
Seam B, overall grades of 23.0% KCl and 24.4% KCl attained by ICL Iberia and ALS, respectively;
|
| • |
Seam A, overall grades of 16.0% KCl and 17.0% KCl attained by ICL Iberia and ALS, respectively.
|
|
Table 9.7: Duplicate Analysis of SAG1
|
||||||||||
|
Sample
|
From
(m)
|
To
(m)
|
Length
(m)
|
Lith
|
ALS (XRF) [1]
|
ALS (XRF) [2]
|
Difference
|
|||
|
K2O
(%)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Duplicate
|
K2O
(%)
|
KCl
(%)
|
KCl (%)
|
|||||
|
SAG1-619.95
|
619.20
|
619.95
|
0.75
|
B
|
31.1
|
49.2
|
QAQC005
|
31.1
|
49.2
|
|
|
0.75
|
49.2
|
49.2
|
0.0
|
|||||||
|
SAG1-628.20
|
627.25
|
628.20
|
0.95
|
AS
|
43.9
|
69.5
|
QAQC006
|
43.8
|
69.3
|
|
|
SAG1-630.80
|
630.20
|
630.80
|
0.60
|
AS
|
46.2
|
73.1
|
QAQC007
|
46.5
|
73.6
|
|
|
SAG1-632.60
|
632.00
|
632.60
|
0.60
|
AS
|
26.4
|
41.8
|
QAQC008
|
26.4
|
41.8
|
|
|
SAG1-634.65
|
634.10
|
634.65
|
0.55
|
AS
|
24.5
|
38.8
|
QAQC009
|
24.5
|
38.8
|
|
|
SAG1-636.65
|
635.75
|
636.65
|
0.90
|
AS
|
20.3
|
32.1
|
QAQC010
|
20.3
|
32.1
|
|
|
SAG1-640.10
|
639.35
|
640.1
|
0.75
|
CR
|
33.8
|
53.5
|
QAQC011
|
33.7
|
53.3
|
|
|
4.3
|
51.8
|
51.8
|
0.0
|
|||||||
|
Note: Calculation of KCl from K2O based on empirical formula: KCl = K2O/0.6317
|
||||||||||
| 9.2.3 |
Review of Drillhole Databases
|
| • |
Review of geological and geographical setting of the Cabanasses and Vilafruns deposits;
|
| • |
Review of extent of the exploration work completed to date;
|
| • |
Inspection of drill core to assess the nature of the mineralisation and to confirm geological descriptions;
|
| • |
Inspection of geology and mineralisation in underground exposures;
|
| • |
Review of drilling, logging, sampling and analysis procedures;
|
| • |
An evaluation of minimum and maximum grade values and sample lengths;
|
| • |
Assessing for inconsistencies in spelling or coding (typographic or case sensitive errors);
|
| • |
Ensuring full data entry for each drillhole and that a specific data type (collar, survey, lithology and assay) is not missing;
|
| • |
Assessing for sample gaps and overlaps;
|
| • |
A review of assay detection limits;
|
| • |
Identification of problematic assay records;
|
| • |
A spatial on-screen review of the grade and lithology distributions of the drillholes was undertaken to identify any additional data reliability issues; and
|
| • |
A review of collar locations for underground or surface drilling.
|
| 9.3 |
QP Opinion
|
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 11.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Cabanasses and Vilafruns Mines
– December 31, 2024
|
||||||
|
Classification
|
Cabanasses
|
Vilafruns
|
Total
|
|||
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
|
|
Measured
|
81.7
|
25.0
|
12.6
|
31.0
|
94.3
|
25.8
|
|
Indicated
|
53.8
|
23.6
|
9.4
|
32.1
|
63.2
|
24.9
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
135.5
|
24.5
|
22.0
|
31.5
|
157.5
|
25.5
|
|
Inferred
|
242.6
|
27.4
|
30.7
|
28.9
|
273.3
|
27.6
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference of Mineral Resources is on an in-situ basis. Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
The Mineral Resource estimate has an effective date of December 31, 2024.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 10% KCl and a minimum seam thickness of 0.5m.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density of 2.1 t/m3.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 86.5%.
|
| 10. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash price of $373/t FOB and a EURO:USD exchange rate of 0.91.
|
| 11.2 |
Database Cut-Off Dates
|
| • |
The final underground drillhole in the database by date containing both lithology and assay data was C348H;
|
| • |
The final surface drillhole in the database containing both lithology and assay data was SAG-5 completed in 2022. No surface drilling has been carried out since this hole.
|
| 11.3 |
Data Transformations
|
| 11.4 |
Software
|
| 11.5 |
Drillhole Databases
|
|
Table 11.2: Drillhole Database Files
|
||
|
Data Type
|
Cabanasses
|
Vilafruns
|
|
Drillhole Collars
|
sondeos_2024_diciembre_dhd_collar.csv
|
vilafruns_sondeos_bt_dhd_collar.csv
|
|
Downhole Surveys
|
sondeos_2024_diciembre_dhd_surveys.csv
|
vilafruns_sondeos_bt_dhd_surveys.csv
|
|
Assay Data
|
sondeos_2024_diciembre_dhd_assays.csv
|
vilafruns_sondeos_bt_dhd_assays.csv
|
|
Geological Logging
|
sondeos_2024_diciembre_dhd_litho.csv
|
vilafruns_sondeos_bt_dhd_litho.csv
|
|
Table 11.3: Description of Database
|
||
|
Field
|
Description
|
Reference
|
|
HoleID
|
Drillhole number
|
Collar
|
|
East, North, Elevation
|
X-Coordinate, Y-Coordinate, Z-Coordinate
|
Collar
|
|
Finish Date
|
Date of completion of drilling
|
Collar
|
|
Type
|
Surface or underground drillhole
|
Collar
|
|
Depth
|
Depth of downhole survey measurement
|
Survey
|
|
Bearing
|
Downhole survey azimuth
|
Survey
|
|
Dip
|
Downhole survey inclination
|
Survey
|
|
Capa
|
Lithology
|
Lithology
|
|
Bou
|
Initial simplified lithology logging
(A: Seam A; B: Seam B; T: Transformada Zone; SAL: Halite)
|
Lithology
|
|
KCl
|
Potassium Chloride Grade (%)
|
Assay
|
|
Ca
|
Ca2+ Grade (%)
|
Assay
|
|
MgCl2
|
Magnesium Chloride Grade (%)
|
Assay
|
|
KClcorr
|
KCl grade adjusted for carnallite content and dissolution of drill core
|
Assay
|
|
Bound
|
Updated simplified lithology logging
|
Assay
|
|
a) Cabanasses Drillhole Database - Plan View
![]() |
|
b) Cabanasses Cross Section A – A’ (Easting 398600m)
![]() c) Cabanasses Cross Section B – B’ (Easting 400800m)
![]() d) Cabanasses Cross Section C – C’ (Easting 402000m)
![]() |
| 11.6 |
Geological Interpretation
|
| 11.6.1 |
Stratigraphy and Lithology
|
|
Table 11.4: Summary of Stratigraphy and Database Lithology Codes
|
|||||
|
Formation
|
Unit
|
Series
|
Description
|
Thickness
|
Lithology Code
|
|
Solsona
|
U17
|
Upper Series
|
Sandstones, conglomerates, lutites and marls
|
Unknown
|
-
|
|
U16
|
Intermediate Series
|
Sandstones, lutites and marls
|
Unknown
|
-
|
|
|
U15
|
Transition Series
|
Red mudstone, sandstones and limestones
|
250-300m
|
-
|
|
|
Artés
|
U14
|
Marker Horizon
|
Limestones
|
5m
|
-
|
|
U13
|
Súria Beds
|
Limonites and sandstones with interbedded limestones
|
150-200m
|
-
|
|
|
U12
|
Marker Horizon
|
Microconglomeritic sandstone
|
5m
|
-
|
|
|
U11b
|
Marker Horizon - "Calizas del Castillo o del Tossal"
|
Limestones
|
5m
|
-
|
|
|
U11a
|
Marker Horizon - "Calizas del Mas Torquer"
|
Limestones
|
5m
|
-
|
|
|
U10
|
"Capas de Súria"
|
Limonites and sandstones with interbedded limestones
|
100m
|
U_8-10
|
|
|
U9
|
Marker Horizon - "Calizas del Cogullo"
|
Limestone
|
5m
|
U_8-10
|
|
|
U8
|
"Capas de Súria"
|
Limonites and sandstones with interbedded limestones
|
150m
|
U_8-10
|
|
|
U7
|
Marker Horizon - "Yesos de la Estacion"
|
Massive gypsum, lutite and halite
|
20-50m
|
U_7
|
|
|
Castelltallat / Súria
|
U6
|
"Unidad Lacustre del Tordell"
|
Limonites, marls and layers of limestone
|
150-200m
|
U_6
|
|
Barbastro
|
U5
|
"Miembro Arcilloso-Evaporitico Superior"
|
Limonites and marls, centimetric layers of gypsum, halite, thin layers of limestone
|
30-40m
|
U_5
|
|
Cardona
|
U4
|
Hangingwall Package
|
Halite (with clay partings)
|
30-50m
|
U_4
|
|
U4
|
Carnallite interbedded with halite ("CAPA C")
|
5-20m
|
C
|
||
|
U4
|
Halite
|
5-15m
|
ST; ST+T
|
||
|
U4
|
Carnallite
|
3-7m
|
CAR; CARN; MCAR; NI-CAR; TE
|
||
|
U4
|
Mine Package
|
Transformada (altered carnallite)
|
1-2m
|
T; B+T
|
|
|
U3
|
Seam B ("CAPA B")
|
2-3m
|
B; B+T
|
||
|
U3
|
Sal Entrados (middle halite)
|
3-6m
|
S2; SMSS2
|
||
|
U3
|
Seam A ("Capa A")
|
4-5m
|
A; AS; CR; EA; EB; S60
|
||
|
U2
|
Footwall Package
|
Semi-massive halite
|
10-20m
|
SMS; SMS+EA
|
|
|
U2
|
Massive halite
|
100-500m
|
SM; SM/SMS
|
||
|
U1
|
Marker Horizon
|
Basal Anhydrite
|
10-15m
|
ANH
|
|
|
Igualada
|
U0
|
"Margas de Igualada"
|
Grey-blue marls with beds of limestone
|
>1,000m
|
-
|
| 11.6.2 |
Mineralised Zone Wireframes
|

| 11.6.3 |
Domaining
|
|
Table 11.5: Summary of Domains for Cabanasses and Vilafruns
|
||||
|
Mine
|
Domain
|
Surface Area
(km2)
|
Seam A
Average Thickness (m)
|
Seam B
Average Thickness (m)
|
|
Cabanasses
|
DN1
|
0.8
|
5.0
|
3.0
|
|
DN2
|
3.5
|
5.6
|
3.0
|
|
|
DN3
|
13.1
|
3.3
|
1.4
|
|
|
DN4
|
3.6
|
4.2
|
3.1
|
|
|
DN5
|
7.9
|
2.8
|
1.1
|
|
|
DS1
|
12.1
|
5.1
|
2.2
|
|
|
DS2
|
1.6
|
3.6
|
2.1
|
|
|
DS3
|
1.6
|
4.1
|
2.4
|
|
|
DS4
|
8.1
|
3.8
|
1.6
|
|
|
DS5
|
5.1
|
5.9
|
2.2
|
|
|
Vilafruns
|
DV1
|
5.0
|
4.3
|
2.1
|
|
DV2
|
0.8
|
4.4
|
2.1
|
|
|
DV3
|
2.5
|
2.0
|
1.8
|
|
|
DV4
|
2.5
|
4.3
|
2.1
|
|
|
Note: Seam B at Cabanasses includes Transformada zone
|
||||

| 11.7 |
Drillhole Data Processing
|
| 11.7.1 |
Grade Capping
|
|
Table 11.6: Summary Statistical Analysis of KCl (%) [CORR] for Selected Samples at Cabanasses
(Domain DS1)
|
|||||||
|
Seam
|
№ of Samples
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
A
|
9,738
|
0
|
89.44
|
24.46
|
278.2
|
16.68
|
0.68
|
|
B
|
4,990
|
0
|
90.07
|
38.26
|
210.1
|
14.50
|
0.38
|
|
Seam B includes Transformada Zone
|
|||||||


|
Table 11.7: Summary Statistical Analysis of KCl (%) [CORR] for Selected Samples at Vilafruns
(Domain DV1)
|
|||||||
|
Seam
|
№ of Samples
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
A
|
1,133
|
0.33
|
84.51
|
23.99
|
285.15
|
16.89
|
0.70
|
|
B
|
558
|
0.13
|
88.46
|
39.72
|
261.56
|
16.17
|
0.41
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| 11.7.2 |
Compositing
|

| 11.8 |
Variography
|
| 11.9 |
Block Modelling
|
|
Table 11.8: Block Model Prototypes
|
|||||||||
|
Mine
|
Domain
|
Block Model Origin Coordinate (m)
|
Number of Parent Blocks
|
Block Size (m) [X x Y x Z]
|
|||||
|
X
|
Y
|
Z
|
X
|
Y
|
Z
|
Parent
|
Sub-Cell
|
||
|
Cabanasses
|
All
|
397,550
|
4,629,068.911
|
-1220
|
650
|
435
|
39
|
20x20x20
|
0.5x0.5x0.5
|
|
Vilafruns
|
DV1
|
401083.484
|
4629089.868
|
-310
|
470
|
380
|
24
|
10 x 10 x 10
|
0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5
|
|
DV2
|
|||||||||
|
DV3
|
|||||||||
|
DV4
|
401200.964
|
4632559.279
|
-420
|
260
|
100
|
34
|
10 x 10 x 10
|
0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5
|
|
|
Cabanasses block model is rotated to 060 degrees along strike.
Vilafruns block model is rotated to 072 degrees along strike.
|
|||||||||
| 11.10 |
Density
|

| 11.11 |
Grade Estimation
|
| 11.11.1 |
Estimation Parameters
|
|
Table 11.9: Summary of Search Parameters
|
||||
|
Mine
|
Domain
|
Search 1 (m)
|
Search 2 (m)
|
Search 3 (m)
|
|
Cabanasses
|
DN1
|
200 x 150 x 150
|
600 x 300 x 250
|
1,800 x 900 x 600
|
|
DN2
|
200 x 150 x 150
|
1,000 x 400 x 150
|
3,000 x 1,700 x 250
|
|
|
DN3
|
300 x 200 x 200
|
2,500 x 1,800 x 250
|
5,000 x 3,000 x 350
|
|
|
DN4
|
200 x 150 x 150
|
1,200 x 500 x 250
|
3,400 x 1,500 x 500
|
|
|
DN5
|
200 x 150 x 150
|
2,500 x 1,800 x 350
|
5,000 x 3,000 x 900
|
|
|
DS1
|
100 x 100 x 50
|
250 x 250 x 75
|
400 x 400 x 100
|
|
|
DS2
|
200 x 150 x 150
|
900 x 700 x 300
|
2,200 x 2,000 x 700
|
|
|
DS3
|
200 x 150 x 150
|
900 x 600 x 400
|
2,200 x 2,200 x 1,000
|
|
|
DS4
|
200 x 150 x 150
|
1,800, 1,200 x 300
|
6,500 x 3,500 x 700
|
|
|
DS5
|
200 x 150 x 150
|
900 x 400 x 250
|
2,400 x 1,200 x 600
|
|
|
Vilafruns
|
DV1
|
120 x 80 x 50
|
250 x 150 x 75
|
400 x 250 x 100
|
|
DV2
|
200 x 150 x 90
|
450 x 250 x 120
|
1,200 x 700 x 200
|
|
|
DV3
|
200 x 150 x 90
|
600 x 350 x 150
|
1,600 x 1,300 x 300
|
|
|
DV4
|
150 x 100 x 75
|
350 x 200 x 100
|
1,000 x 600 x 150
|
|
|
Search ellipses orientated by: Distance 1 - along strike direction, Distance 2 – across strike direction, Distance 3 - orthoganal
|
||||
| 11.11.2 |
Spatial Grade and Thickness Distribution
|
|
a) Cabanasses Seam A – Block Model Showing KClcorr (%) Grades
![]() |
|
b) Cabanasses Seam B – Block Model Showing KClcorr (%) Grades
![]() |
|
a) Cabanasses Seam A – Block Model Showing Seam Thickness (m)
![]() |
|
b) Cabanasses Seam B – Block Model Showing Seam Thickness (m)
![]() |
| 11.11.3 |
Grade Estimation Validation
|
|
a) Cabanasses: Seam A (060° – 10m Panels)
![]() |
b) Cabanasses: Seam A (150° – 10m Panels)
![]() |
|
c) Cabanasses: Seam B (060° – 10m Panels)
![]() |
d) Cabanasses: Seam B (150° – 10m Panels)
![]() |
| 11.12 |
Reconciliation with Mining Production Data
|
|
Table 11.10: Summary of Reconciliation of Cabanasses Resource Model with Mining Production Data
|
|||||||||||
|
Broken
|
Stowed
|
Hoisted
|
Mining Losses
|
Mining Dilution (Factor)
|
Hoisted
(Excl. Dilution)
|
Resource
Model
|
|||||
|
Unit
|
Tonnes
|
Tonnes
|
Tonnes
|
KCl
(%)
|
Tonnes
|
%
|
%
|
Tonnes
|
KCl
(%)
|
Tonnes
|
KCl
(%)
|
|
2021
|
|||||||||||
|
Seam A
|
1,356,464
|
115,299
|
1,013,279
|
20.9
|
227,886
|
22
|
13
|
878,513
|
24.2
|
1,376,907
|
23.2
|
|
Seam B
|
2,035,140
|
211,655
|
1,520,249
|
29.0
|
303,236
|
20
|
29
|
1,074,816
|
41.0
|
1,090,366
|
39.0
|
|
2022
|
|||||||||||
|
Seam A
|
1,840,068
|
220,808
|
1,485,313
|
21.9
|
133,947
|
9
|
11
|
1,318,958
|
24.7
|
2,373,905
|
23.6
|
|
Seam B
|
1,765,516
|
247,172
|
1,425,134
|
28.8
|
93,210
|
7
|
31
|
979,067
|
41.9
|
968,484
|
40.9
|
|
2023
|
|||||||||||
|
Seam A
|
1,528,914
|
143,758
|
1,183,049
|
20.8
|
202,107
|
17
|
16
|
991,395
|
24.8
|
1,657,311
|
22.5
|
|
Seam B
|
2,076,670
|
195,262
|
2,076,670
|
26.6
|
274,514
|
17
|
37
|
1,013,950
|
42.2
|
901,259
|
40.9
|
|
Stowed material estimated based on percentage of broken material as follows:
• 2021 – Seam A: 9%, Seam B: 10%
• 2022 – Seam A: 12%, Seam B: 14%
• 2023 – Seam A: 8%, Seam B: 9%.
|
|||||||||||
| • |
For 2021, the resource model is within 2 % of the reported hoisted tonnes (excluding dilution) with lower KCl grades (39.0 % KCl verses 41.0 % KCl);
|
| • |
For 2022, the resource model is within 1 % of the reported hoisted tonnes (excluding dilution) with lower KCl grades (40.9 % KCl verses 41.9 % KCl);
|
| • |
For 2023, the resource model is within 11 % of the reported hoisted tonnes (excluding dilution) with lower KCl grades (40.9 % KCl verses 42.2 % KCl).
|
| 11.13 |
Mineral Resource Classification
|
| 11.13.1 |
Drillhole Data
|
| 11.13.2 |
Geological Interpretation and Geological Continuity
|
| 11.13.3 |
Data Spacing and Orientation
|
| 11.13.4 |
Spatial Grade Continuity
|
| 11.13.5 |
Classification
|
| • |
Measured Mineral Resources: are classified at DS1 and DV1 based on a drillhole spacing of
80 – 150m. In addition, these areas have a significant production history and are subject to on-going reconciliation studies. |
| • |
Indicated Mineral Resources: halo the Measured Mineral Resources within areas confirmed by surface drilling and/or seismic survey data. Drillhole spacings within areas of Indicated
Mineral Resources are up to 1,700m.
|
| • |
Inferred Mineral Resources: halo the Indicated Mineral Resources within the remaining licence area and are covered by seismic data or limited surface drilling.
|
| • |
Unclassified Mineral Resources: include non-recoverable resources or areas of low grade or low seam thickness. Unclassified resources were excluded from the Mineral Resource
estimate.
|

| 11.14 |
Depletion and Non-Recoverable Resources
|
| • |
Mined-out areas based on underground mine survey data;
|
| • |
Resources located in close proximity to essential mine infrastructure (shafts and decline) are considered as non-recoverable and includes:
|
| o |
200 m safety pillar around Shaft IV; and
|
| o |
200 m safety pillar around the Cabanasses decline.
|
| • |
Resources located around the traces of completed surface drillholes are sterilised for safety reasons. These resources are not mined to prevent the drillhole trace from acting as a
potential ingress of water into the mine:
|
| o |
For historical drillholes a radius of 50 m from the drillhole trace is considered as non-recoverable;
|
| o |
For recent drillholes which have been surveyed with modern downhole survey equipment, a radius of 25 m is used.
|
| • |
Resources located within 200 m of the Tordell Fault are sterilised to prevent possible water ingress on this major thrust zone. This zone is known to be structurally complex and it
is thought the potash is absent from this area due to deformation. The safety pillar is wider in the north than the south, as in the south the fault plane is below the potash workings; and
|
| • |
Areas identified as being below a cut-off grade of 10 % KCl and areas of low seam thicknesses are also considered by ICL Iberia as non-recoverable.
|
| 11.15 |
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
| • |
1m for zones with dip angles of 5° to 14°.
|
| • |
0.5m for flat lying zones (<5° dip).
|
| • |
2m for steeply dipping of 5° to 14°.
|
| • |
1m for flat lying zones (<5° dip).
|
| 11.16 |
Mineral Resource Statement
|
| 11.17 |
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
| 12 |
| 12.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Cabanasses Mine – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grade
(% KCl)
|
|
Proven
|
35.9
|
25.2
|
|
Probable
|
59.4
|
25.8
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
95.3
|
25.6
|
| 1. |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with S-K 1300 classification system.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a cut-off grade of 19% KCl.
|
| 7. |
A minimum mining width of 5m was used.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 86.5%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a medium-long term potash price of $330/t FOB and a EURO:USD exchange rate of 0.91.
|
| 12.2 |
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|


| 12.3 |
Dilution and Mining Recovery
|
| 12.4 |
Cut-Off Grade
|
| 12.5 |
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
| 12.6 |
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
| 13 |
| 13.1 |
Geotechnics and Hydrogeology
|
| 13.2 |
Mine Production
|
| 13.3 |
Underground Infrastructure
|
| 13.3.1 |
Shafts and Decline
|
| 13.3.2 |
Main Access and Transport
|
| 13.3.3 |
Potash Access
|
| 13.3.4 |
Ore and Waste Handling Systems
|
| 13.3.5 |
Ventilation
|
| 13.3.6 |
Mine Layout
|

| 13.4 |
Production
|
|
Table 13.1: Cabanasses Mine Production (2021 to 2024)
|
||||
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
Ore Hoisted (kt)
|
2,534
|
2,928
|
2,795
|
3,247
|
|
Tonnes Processed (kt)
|
2,534
|
2,928
|
2,790
|
3,217
|
|
Head Grade (% KCl)
|
26.4
|
25.3
|
24.3
|
26.7
|
|
Saleable Product (kt)
|
599* / 614**
|
664* / 680**
|
584* / 601**
|
786* / 802**
|
|
Saleable Product Grade (% KCl)
|
95.5
|
95.3
|
95.5
|
95.5
|
|
Metallurgical Recovery (%)
|
85.3
|
85.2
|
86.5
|
87.0
|
| 13.5 |
Life of Mine Schedule
|
|
Table 13.2: Cabanasses Life of Mine Schedule
|
|||||||||||
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
2030
|
2031
|
2032
|
2033
|
2034
|
2035
|
|
|
Waste Tonnes (Mt)
|
0.52
|
0.59
|
0.71
|
0.64
|
0.68
|
0.66
|
0.72
|
0.70
|
0.73
|
0.78
|
0.65
|
|
Proven Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
4.05
|
4.24
|
3.76
|
2.18
|
0.82
|
0.09
|
0.17
|
0.84
|
0.08
|
0.79
|
1.53
|
|
KCl (%)
|
25.83
|
25.57
|
25.95
|
25.43
|
25.17
|
25.36
|
29.71
|
29.26
|
22.00
|
23.11
|
26.72
|
|
Saleable Product (Mt)
|
0.97
|
1.00
|
0.90
|
0.51
|
0.19
|
0.02
|
0.05
|
0.23
|
0.02
|
0.17
|
0.38
|
|
Probable Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
-
|
0.11
|
0.75
|
2.60
|
3.97
|
4.54
|
4.42
|
3.81
|
4.53
|
3.77
|
3.15
|
|
KCl (%)
|
-
|
24.70
|
26.99
|
24.85
|
27.72
|
29.26
|
29.76
|
27.80
|
26.77
|
26.99
|
28.46
|
|
Saleable Product (Mt)
|
-
|
0.02
|
0.19
|
0.60
|
1.01
|
1.22
|
1.21
|
0.98
|
1.12
|
0.94
|
0.83
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
4.05
|
4.35
|
4.51
|
4.78
|
4.78
|
4.63
|
4.59
|
4.65
|
4.60
|
4.56
|
4.69
|
|
KCl (%)
|
25.83
|
25.55
|
26.12
|
25.12
|
27.29
|
29.18
|
29.76
|
28.06
|
26.69
|
26.32
|
27.89
|
|
Saleable Product (Mt)
|
0.97
|
1.03
|
1.09
|
1.11
|
1.20
|
1.24
|
1.26
|
1.20
|
1.13
|
1.11
|
1.20
|
|
2036
|
2037
|
2038
|
2039
|
2040
|
2041
|
2042
|
2043
|
2044
|
2045
|
Total
|
|
|
Waste Tonnes (Mt)
|
0.62
|
0.72
|
0.67
|
0.62
|
0.75
|
0.68
|
0.64
|
0.63
|
0.50
|
0.09
|
13.30
|
|
Proven Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
0.98
|
1.27
|
1.38
|
3.14
|
3.60
|
2.60
|
1.21
|
0.64
|
1.80
|
0.72
|
35.89
|
|
KCl (%)
|
23.84
|
23.92
|
25.43
|
24.71
|
22.56
|
24.94
|
22.22
|
26.61
|
26.71
|
28.29
|
25.20
|
|
Saleable Product (Mt)
|
0.22
|
0.28
|
0.32
|
0.72
|
0.75
|
0.60
|
0.25
|
0.16
|
0.44
|
0.19
|
8.35
|
|
Probable Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
4.04
|
3.67
|
3.14
|
1.43
|
0.65
|
1.89
|
3.37
|
3.95
|
2.66
|
2.96
|
59.40
|
|
KCl (%)
|
25.37
|
25.14
|
26.65
|
26.33
|
24.49
|
23.29
|
20.87
|
22.30
|
20.03
|
21.66
|
25.79
|
|
Saleable Product (Mt)
|
0.94
|
0.85
|
0.77
|
0.35
|
0.15
|
0.41
|
0.65
|
0.82
|
0.50
|
0.60
|
14.14
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
5.02
|
4.94
|
4.52
|
4.57
|
4.25
|
4.50
|
4.58
|
4.59
|
4.46
|
3.68
|
95.29
|
|
KCl (%)
|
25.07
|
24.82
|
26.27
|
25.22
|
22.86
|
24.25
|
21.22
|
22.90
|
22.72
|
22.96
|
25.57
|
|
Saleable Product (Mt)
|
1.16
|
1.13
|
1.10
|
1.06
|
0.90
|
1.01
|
0.90
|
0.97
|
0.94
|
0.79
|
22.49
|
| 1. |
Ore tonnes are Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves as presented in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 2. |
Mining losses and mining dilution applied as detailed in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 3. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 13.6 |
Mining Equipment
|
|
Table 13.3: Summary of Mining Equipment
|
||
|
Machine
|
№ of Items
|
|
|
Continuous Miners
|
MINADOR ALPINE AM-85
|
4
|
|
MINADOR ALPINE MR-520
|
13
|
|
|
MINADOR ALPINE AM-50
|
5
|
|
|
Trucks
|
CAMION WAGNER MT436B
|
25
|
|
GHH SK-A30.1
|
5
|
|
|
Bolting machines
|
JUMBO SANDVIK TAMROCK
|
1
|
|
JUMBO SANDVIK DS311D
|
8
|
|
|
JUMBO SMAG
|
1
|
|
|
Scaling machines
|
LIEBHERR 912
|
3
|
|
LIEBHERR 900 LIPTRONIC
|
1
|
|
|
LIEBHERR 916
|
3
|
|
|
PAUS PSCALE 8-T
|
1
|
|
|
LHDs
|
PALA WAGNER ST 8B
|
11
|
|
PALA WAGNER ST 1030
|
6
|
|
|
PALA WAGNER ST 14
|
9
|
|
|
Auxiliary Machinery
|
PALA BOB-CAT S-220
|
2
|
|
PALA BOB-CAT S-630
|
4
|
|
|
MANIP. BOB-CAT T40140
|
8
|
|
|
MANIP. BOB-CAT T41140
|
9
|
|
|
MANIP. BOB-CAT T2250
|
2
|
|
|
MANIP. BOB-CAT T3571
|
1
|
|
|
MANIP. BOB-CAT T35 120SL
|
1
|
|
|
MANIP. MERLO
|
2
|
|
|
MANIP. JCB 540V140
|
1
|
|
|
NEXTRENCHER FC-2600
|
2
|
|
|
LIGHT TRUCK CAMION CATERPILLAR
|
2
|
|
|
LIGHT TRUCK CAMION WAGNER MT436B
|
1
|
|
|
LIGHT TRUCK IVECO DAILY
|
2
|
|
|
CRANE GRUA PAUS
|
3
|
|
|
AUSA M250M
|
2
|
|
|
CRANE GRUA GETMAN A-64
|
2
|
|
| 13.7 |
Mining Personnel
|
| • |
Ordinary shifts: 170 people within six teams working on three shifts (9 hours)
|
| • |
Asynchronous shifts: 126 people within five teams working on three shifts (8 hours)
|
|
Table 13.4: Mining Personnel at Cabanasses Mine
|
|
|
Department
|
Number
|
|
Operations
|
304
|
|
Maintenance
|
144
|
|
Geology
|
8
|
|
Survey
|
11
|
|
Planning
|
7
|
|
Rock Mechanics
|
10
|
|
Operational Excellence, Innovation & Process Engineering
|
2
|
|
Health & Safety
|
4
|
|
Total
|
492
|
| 14 |
| 14.1 |
Process Description
|

| 14.1.1 |
Crushing
|
| 14.1.2 |
Rod Milling
|
| 14.1.3 |
Classification
|
| 14.1.4 |
Coarse Flotation
|
| 14.1.5 |
Flotation Tails Regrinding
|
| 14.1.6 |
Fine Flotation
|
| 14.1.7 |
Tailings Thickening and Filtration
|
| 14.1.8 |
Concentrate Centrifuging and Filtering
|
| 14.1.9 |
Drying Plant
|
| 14.1.10 |
Compaction Plant
|
| 14.1.11 |
Brine Circuit
|
| 14.2 |
Processing Personnel
|
|
Table 14.1: Súria Processing Plant Personnel
|
|
|
Area / Department
|
Number
|
|
Operation
|
67
|
|
Maintenance
|
43
|
|
Laboratory
|
10
|
|
Process Control
|
5
|
|
Weigh Scale
|
2
|
|
Vacuum Salt Plant
|
27
|
|
Total
|
154
|
| 14.3 |
Discussion on Processing and Recovery Methods
|
| 15 |
| 15.1 |
Surface Layout
|


| 15.2 |
Roads
|
| 15.3 |
Rail
|
| 15.4 |
Port
|
| 15.5 |
Energy
|
| 15.6 |
Water
|
| 15.7 |
Effluent Water
|
| 15.8 |
Waste Dumps and Salt Transportation Pipeline
|

| 16 |
| 16.1 |
Potash Market
|
| 16.2 |
Demand
|
| • |
Brazil is one of the largest consumers of potash globally with 95 % of potash imported from Canada, Russia, Germany and Israel, making up 25 % of the global imported potash. However,
the Autazes Potash Project is expected to supply a significant portion of Brazil’s annual potash demand for the next three decades once it comes online around 2029.
|
| • |
In 2023, China made up 21 % of the global imported potash. In 2024, China initiated a MOP import contract with a Russian supplier to reboot the dormant market which is likely to
influence buyers’ bids in other key regions such as south-east Asia and Brazil. A Chinese MOP producer has also started construction on a new potash plant in Laos which is expected to be producing 1 Mt/yr by the end of 2026 with exports in
early 2027, making it the third in the country. In June 2024, China introduced additional restrictions on fertilizer exports to stabilise domestic prices and safeguard food security but have interrupted global fertiliser supplies, prompting
countries such as India and South Korea to seek alternatives in a market already impacted by geopolitical tensions and disrupted shipping routes.
|
| • |
The US is one of the top producers of potash globally but still imports additional resources to meet their needs. The potential introduction of import tariffs for all imports from
Canada will have a significant impact on potash, as suppliers will either lower their prices to mitigate this or keep them the same but risk losing their US market, meaning the US may have to source potash from other regions and affecting the
overall global market as US demands for potash increase.
|
| 16.3 |
Commodity Price Projections
|
| 16.4 |
Contracts
|
| 16.4.1 |
Potash Sales Contracts
|
| 16.4.2 |
Other Contracts
|
| 17 |
| 17.1 |
Permitting
|
|
Table 17.1: Summary of ICL Iberia Permits
|
|||||
|
Permit
|
Description
|
Granted by
|
Granted on
|
Duration
|
Renewal
|
|
SÚRIA
|
|||||
|
Mining Concession
|
Roumanie Mining Concession for the activity of Potash extraction
|
MAGC
|
April 27, 1977
|
90 years
|
-
|
|
Environmental Authorisation
|
Main Environmental Authorisation, for activity of potash mining with Environmental Impact Assessment.
|
MAGC
|
September 11, 2006
|
Linked with the Mining Concession
|
Every four years, or in case of modification of the activity.
|
|
Modification of the Environmental Authorisation, for potash mining with Environmental Impact Assessment
|
MAGC
|
March 4, 2014
|
Linked with the Mining Concession
|
Every four years, or in case of modification of the activity.
|
|
|
Modification of the environmental authorisation
|
MAGC
|
June 6, 2016
|
Linked with the Mining Concession
|
Every four years (or 2 years for waste disposal)
|
|
|
New modification of the environmental authorisation to increase production capacity
|
MAGC
|
November 19, 2021
|
Linked with the Mining Concession
|
Every four years, or in case of modification of the activity.
|
|
|
Urban & Environmental License for Salt Stockpiling
|
The current salt deposit in Súria has an authorisation with environmental impact assessment to enlarge the capacity of such deposit.
|
MAGC
|
October, 2018
|
Linked with mining concession
|
Enlargement application has been submitted. Estimated in May 2025.
|
|
Water Disposal
|
Water concession for extraction of natural water for industrial process (1.4 hm3)
|
ACA
|
June 9, 2017
|
25 years
|
-
|
|
Brine Collector Discharge
|
Water concession to release wastewater to the environment (53 litres/second)
|
ACA
|
November 12, 2019
|
5 years
|
New authorization is being processed. Documentation submitted on October 8, 2024
|
|
New Water Disposal
|
Water concession to use treatment water from Manresa SWTP (6.8 hm3)
|
ACA
|
April 9, 2021
|
25 years
|
-
|
|
Restoration Plan for Súria Activity
|
Restoration Plan
|
MAGC
|
July, 2018
|
5 years
|
Documentation submitted in October 2023. Awaiting final resolution.
|
|
GHG Concession
|
Right to emit GHG to the atmosphere
|
DGQA
|
December 22, 2020
|
8 years
|
-
|
|
PRTR
|
Declaration of the annual amount of pollution substances released to the environment
|
ARC
|
March 3, 2017
|
Report yearly
|
-
|
|
SALLENT
|
|||||
|
Mining Concession EMERIKA
|
EMERIKA Mining Concession for the activity of Potash extraction
|
MAGC
|
August 11, 1977
|
90 years
|
-
|
|
Environmental Authorisation of the Activity
|
Main Environmental Authorisation, for activity of potash mining with Environmental Impact Assessment.
|
MAGC
|
April 29, 2008
|
Linked with the Mining Concession
|
Reviewed every four years, or in case of modification of the activity.
|
|
Water Disposal/Supply
|
Water concession to use natural water for industrial process (0.8 hm3)
|
ACA
|
April 19, 2017
|
5 years
|
Application submitted for 1.5 Hm3/year. Expected in June 2025.
|
|
New Water Disposal/Supply
|
Water concession for treatment of water from Sallent SWTP (0.9 hm3)
|
ACA
|
May 8, 2020
|
50 years
|
-
|
|
Brine Collector Discharge
|
Water concession to release wastewater to the environment
|
ACA
|
March 24, 2024
|
5 years
|
-
|
|
Restoration Plan for Sallent Activity
|
Restoration Plan
|
MAGC
|
March, 2022
|
5 years
|
|
|
Air Emission Concession
|
Right to emit substances to the atmosphere
|
DGQA
|
November 27, 2018
|
8 years
|
Will not be renewed as no longer applicable to Sallent.
|
|
GHG Concession
|
Right to emit GHG to the atmosphere
|
DGQA
|
December 22, 2020
|
8 years
|
-
|
|
PRTR
|
Declaration of the annual amount of pollution substances released to the environment
|
ARC
|
March 3, 2017
|
Renewed annually
|
|
|
TRAMER, S.A
|
|||||
|
TRAMER Port Concession
|
Concession of the Port Terminal in Port of Barcelona to shipload Salt and Potash, 80,492.99m2 surface plot
|
Barcelona Port Authority
|
-
|
-
|
Reviewed every 6 years, or in case of modification of the activity
|
|
Environmental License
|
Environmental License to carry out the Activity of ship loading of Salt and Potash
|
Town Hall of Barcelona
|
April 4, 2016
|
-
|
-
|
|
DGQA - Direcció General de Qualitat Ambiental
ACA – Catalonia Water Agency
ARC – Catalonia Waste Agency
MAGC – Mines Agency Generalitat of Catalonia
|
|||||
| 17.2 |
Water
|
|
Table 17.2: ACA Wastewater Discharge Limits
|
|||
|
Parameter
|
Fixed value
|
Monitoring frequency
|
|
|
Maximum
|
Unit
|
||
|
Annual flow
|
1,670,000
|
m3/year
|
-
|
|
Half flow
|
190.8
|
m3/h
|
-
|
|
Tip flow
|
53
|
l/s
|
-
|
|
Suspension matters
|
250
|
mg/l
|
monthly
|
|
Sedimented matters
|
30
|
ml/l
|
monthly
|
|
Temperature
|
35
|
ºC
|
monthly
|
|
pH
|
6-10
|
--
|
monthly
|
|
Total hydrocarbons
|
15
|
mg/l
|
semestral
|
|
Cl-
|
160
|
g/l
|
-
|
|
(SO4)2-
|
10
|
g/l
|
-
|
|
(SO4)2-/(Cl)-
|
0.01-0.15
|
g/l
|
-
|
|
(CO3H)-
|
1
|
g/l
|
-
|
|
Na+
|
100
|
g/l
|
-
|
|
K+
|
50
|
g/l
|
-
|
|
(Ca)2+
|
3
|
g/l
|
-
|
|
(Mg)2+
|
20
|
g/l
|
-
|
|
Oils and fats
|
50
|
mg/l
|
semestral
|
|
Total phosphorous
|
30
|
mg/l
|
-
|
|
Phosphates
|
90
|
mg/l
|
trimestral
|
|
Nitrates
|
100
|
mg/l
|
trimestral
|
| 17.3 |
Air Emissions
|
| 17.4 |
Waste
|
| 17.5 |
Environmental Health and Safety Management
|
| 17.5.1 |
Policies and Certifications
|
| • |
UNE 22480 - Sustainable mining management certification by the Spanish Normalisation Organisation (UNE) promoted by the National Confederation of Mining and Metallurgy Companies
(CONFEDEM) and aimed at adopting the Mining Association of Canada
|
| • |
IS0 14001 – Environmental management
|
| • |
ISO 9001 – Quality management
|
| • |
ISO 45001 – Occupational Health and Safety
|
| • |
ISO 14067 – Carbon footprint of products
|
| • |
ISO 22000 – Food safety management
|
| • |
BS OHSAS 18001:2007 – Occupational Health and Safety
|
| • |
FEIQUE Responsible Care – Corporate social responsibility certificate issued by the chemical industry federation in Spain
|
| • |
Strategic impact in SDG 2 (zero hunger)
|
| • |
Direct impact in SDGs 8 (decent work and economic growth), 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure), and 12 (responsible consumption and production)
|
| • |
Indirect impact in SDGs 3 (good health and well-being), 6 (clean water and sanitation), 10 (reduced inequalities), 13 (climate action) and 15 (life on land)
|
| 17.5.2 |
Personnel and Occupational Health and Safety
|
| 17.6 |
Plans, Negotiations or Agreements with Stakeholders
|
| 17.6.1 |
Stakeholder Engagement
|
| 17.6.2 |
Engagement with Worker Unions
|
| 17.6.3 |
Social Development
|
| 17.7 |
Mine Closure Plans
|
| 17.8 |
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
| 18 |
| 18.1 |
Capital Costs
|
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for Cabanasses Mine
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
1,033.0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
297.8
|
|
Other
|
$M
|
46.2
|
|
Total Capital Costs
|
$M
|
1,377.0
|
| 18.2 |
Operating Costs
|
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for Cabanasses Mine
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
3,368.1
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
1,812.1
|
|
G&A
|
$M
|
150.5
|
|
Depreciation
|
$M
|
-1,376.9
|
|
Total Operating Costs
|
$M
|
3,952.7
|
| 19 |
| 19.1 |
Economic Criteria
|
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for the Cabanasses Mine
|
||
|
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
|
Mining
|
||
|
Mine Life
|
Years
|
21
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes Mined
|
Mt
|
95.3
|
|
Waste Tonnes
|
Mt
|
18.1
|
|
Mining Rate (Ore and Waste)
|
Mtpa
|
5.4
|
|
Processing
|
||
|
Total Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
95.3
|
|
Grade KCl
|
%
|
25.6
|
|
Processing Rate
|
Mtpa
|
4.5
|
|
Plant Recovery
|
%
|
86.5
|
|
Economic Factors
|
||
|
Discount Rate
|
%
|
8
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
€ to $
|
0.91
|
|
Commodity Price
|
$/t FOB
|
330
|
|
Taxes
|
%
|
25
|
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
4.2
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
18.0
|
|
Revenues
|
$M
|
6,954.8
|
|
Capital Costs (including closure)
|
$M
|
1,547.3
|
|
Operating Costs
|
$M
|
3,952.7
|
| 19.2 |
Cash Flow Analysis
|
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for the Cabanasses Mine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Description
|
Unit
|
LOM Total
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
2030
|
2031
|
2032
|
2033
|
2034
|
2035
|
2036
|
2037
|
2038
|
2039
|
2040
|
2041
|
2042
|
2043
|
2044
|
2045
|
2046
|
|
Mining
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore
|
Mt
|
95.3
|
4.05
|
4.35
|
4.51
|
4.78
|
4.78
|
4.63
|
4.59
|
4.65
|
4.60
|
4.56
|
4.69
|
5.02
|
4.94
|
4.52
|
4.57
|
4.25
|
4.50
|
4.58
|
4.59
|
4.46
|
3.68
|
0
|
|
Waste
|
Mt
|
18.1
|
0.77
|
0.83
|
0.86
|
0.91
|
0.91
|
0.88
|
0.87
|
0.88
|
0.87
|
0.87
|
0.89
|
0.95
|
0.94
|
0.86
|
0.87
|
0.81
|
0.85
|
0.87
|
0.87
|
0.85
|
0.70
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
95.3
|
4.05
|
4.35
|
4.51
|
4.78
|
4.78
|
4.63
|
4.59
|
4.65
|
4.60
|
4.56
|
4.69
|
5.02
|
4.94
|
4.52
|
4.57
|
4.25
|
4.50
|
4.58
|
4.59
|
4.46
|
3.68
|
0
|
|
Grade KCl
|
%
|
25.6
|
25.8
|
25.5
|
26.1
|
25.1
|
27.3
|
29.2
|
29.8
|
28.1
|
26.7
|
26.3
|
27.9
|
25.1
|
24.8
|
26.3
|
25.2
|
22.9
|
24.2
|
21.2
|
22.9
|
22.7
|
23.0
|
0
|
|
Contained KCl
|
Mt
|
24.4
|
1.05
|
1.11
|
1.18
|
1.20
|
1.31
|
1.35
|
1.36
|
1.30
|
1.23
|
1.20
|
1.31
|
1.26
|
1.23
|
1.19
|
1.15
|
0.97
|
1.09
|
0.97
|
1.05
|
1.01
|
0.85
|
0
|
|
Recovered KCl
|
Mt
|
21.1
|
0.90
|
0.96
|
1.02
|
1.04
|
1.13
|
1.17
|
1.18
|
1.13
|
1.06
|
1.04
|
1.13
|
1.09
|
1.06
|
1.03
|
1.00
|
0.84
|
0.94
|
0.84
|
0.91
|
0.88
|
0.73
|
0
|
|
Revenue
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Potash
|
$M
|
6,954.8
|
297.8
|
316.5
|
336.3
|
342.9
|
372.5
|
385.7
|
389.0
|
372.5
|
350.5
|
342.9
|
373.6
|
359.3
|
349.5
|
339.6
|
328.6
|
278.0
|
311.0
|
276.9
|
300.0
|
289.0
|
241.8
|
0
|
|
Operating Costs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
3,368.1
|
163.6
|
151.1
|
155.2
|
157.8
|
166.4
|
168.1
|
168.6
|
166.4
|
163.5
|
162.4
|
166.7
|
164.8
|
163.6
|
162.1
|
160.7
|
153.2
|
158.7
|
153.6
|
157.4
|
155.6
|
148.0
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
1,812.1
|
78.4
|
78.6
|
81.9
|
85.1
|
90.3
|
91.3
|
91.5
|
90.3
|
88.8
|
88.2
|
90.5
|
89.6
|
88.8
|
88.0
|
87.3
|
83.2
|
86.2
|
83.4
|
85.5
|
84.5
|
80.4
|
0
|
|
G&A
|
$M
|
150.5
|
10.3
|
7.1
|
7.1
|
7.1
|
7.1
|
7.3
|
7.3
|
7.1
|
7.0
|
7.0
|
7.3
|
7.1
|
7.0
|
7.0
|
6.9
|
6.6
|
6.8
|
6.6
|
6.8
|
6.7
|
6.4
|
0
|
|
Depreciation
|
$M
|
-1,376.9
|
-56.7
|
-64.5
|
-81.3
|
-61.5
|
-57.8
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
-65.9
|
0
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
3,952.7
|
195.5
|
172.2
|
162.9
|
188.6
|
206.0
|
200.8
|
201.5
|
198.0
|
193.5
|
191.8
|
198.5
|
195.6
|
193.5
|
191.2
|
188.9
|
177.1
|
185.8
|
177.7
|
183.6
|
181.0
|
169.0
|
0
|
|
Capital Costs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
1,033.0
|
31.4
|
39.9
|
42.1
|
44.2
|
48.8
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
51.6
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
297.8
|
23.1
|
22.7
|
36.8
|
14.8
|
6.8
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
0
|
|
Other
|
$M
|
46.2
|
2.2
|
1.9
|
2.4
|
2.5
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
0
|
|
Closure
|
$M
|
170.3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
170
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
1,547.3
|
56.7
|
64.5
|
81.3
|
61.5
|
57.8
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
65.9
|
170
|
|
Cash Flow
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
4.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
18.0
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0
|
|
Pre-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
1,433.0
|
45.1
|
79.1
|
90.8
|
91.8
|
107.6
|
118.2
|
121.0
|
107.4
|
90.2
|
84.1
|
107.6
|
96.6
|
89.2
|
81.0
|
73.0
|
33.4
|
58.4
|
32.5
|
49.5
|
41.2
|
5.5
|
-170
|
|
Tax (25%)
|
$M
|
401.1
|
11.2
|
19.8
|
22.6
|
23.0
|
26.9
|
29.6
|
30.2
|
26.8
|
22.5
|
21.0
|
26.9
|
24.2
|
22.3
|
20.2
|
18.2
|
8.4
|
14.6
|
8.1
|
12.4
|
10.3
|
1.4
|
0
|
|
DTA
|
$M
|
-133.0
|
-7.9
|
-13.8
|
-15.9
|
-16.0
|
-18.8
|
-20.7
|
-21.2
|
-18.8
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
After-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
1,164.8
|
41.6
|
73.2
|
84.0
|
84.8
|
99.6
|
109.3
|
111.9
|
99.2
|
67.7
|
63.0
|
80.8
|
72.4
|
66.9
|
60.8
|
54.7
|
25.1
|
43.7
|
24.4
|
37.1
|
30.9
|
4.2
|
-170
|
|
Project Economics
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After Tax NPV (8%)
|
$M
|
739.7
|
41.7
|
67.8
|
72.0
|
67.4
|
73.2
|
74.4
|
70.5
|
57.9
|
36.6
|
31.5
|
37.4
|
31.1
|
26.6
|
22.3
|
18.6
|
7.9
|
12.8
|
6.6
|
9.3
|
7.2
|
0.9
|
-33.8
|
| 19.3 |
Sensitivity Analysis
|
| • |
Commodity price
|
| • |
Head grade
|
| • |
Metallurgical recovery
|
| • |
Exchange rate
|
| • |
Operating costs
|
| • |
Capital costs
|
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for the Cabanasses Mine
|
||
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Commodity Price ($/t FOB)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
264
|
106.5
|
|
-10%
|
297
|
426.4
|
|
0%
|
330
|
739.7
|
|
10%
|
363
|
1052
|
|
20%
|
396
|
1364.2
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Head Grade (% KCl)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
20.5
|
106.5
|
|
-10%
|
23.0
|
426.4
|
|
0%
|
25.6
|
739.7
|
|
10%
|
28.1
|
1052
|
|
20%
|
30.7
|
1364.2
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Recovery (%)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
-
|
-
|
|
-10%
|
76.5
|
377.4
|
|
0%
|
86.5
|
739.7
|
|
10%
|
96.5
|
1100.7
|
|
20%
|
-
|
-
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Exchange Rate (€:$)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
0.73
|
133.1
|
|
-10%
|
0.82
|
426.4
|
|
0%
|
0.91
|
739.7
|
|
10%
|
1.00
|
1052.0
|
|
20%
|
1.09
|
1364.2
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Operating Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
3,162.6
|
1087.5
|
|
-10%
|
3,557.1
|
913.6
|
|
0%
|
3,952.7
|
739.7
|
|
10%
|
4,348.4
|
565.1
|
|
20%
|
4,742.9
|
389.9
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Capital Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 8% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
1,237.4
|
866.5
|
|
-10%
|
1,392.3
|
803.1
|
|
0%
|
1,547.3
|
739.7
|
|
10%
|
1,702.2
|
676.2
|
|
20%
|
1,856.0
|
612.4
|

| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 22.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Mineral Resources for the Property have been prepared to industry best practice and conform to the resource categories defined by the SEC in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
The geology and mineralization of the deposits is well understood and includes significant operational experience.
|
| • |
As of October 15, 2024, a total of 2,618 underground drillholes for 903,231m have been completed at Cabanasses while 15 surface drillholes for 14,824m have been completed. A total of
425 underground drillholes for 131,719m have been completed at Vilafruns and no surface drilling.
|
| • |
The sample preparation, analyses, QA/QC procedures, and sample security are acceptable and in line with industry standard practice. Data verification identified no significant issues
with the databases used for Mineral Resource estimation.
|
| • |
Measured Mineral Resources are classified on a drill spacing of 80 m – 100 m. Indicated Mineral Resources are classified based on a drill spacing of up to 1,700 m and within areas
covered by seismic survey. Inferred Mineral Resources include the remaining area of the licences and covered by seismic survey with some limited surface drilling.
|
| • |
There is significant exploration potential at the deposits, particularly with additional surface drilling to step-out beyond the near-mine area.
|
| 22.2 |
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
| • |
Mineral Reserves for the Property have been classified in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Reserves in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources were converted to Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves, respectively. Inferred Mineral Resources were not converted to Mineral Reserves.
|
| • |
Mining uses a modified room and pillar method with electric powered continuous miner machines. Production panels are defined, and the continuous miners extract in these following the
visible seam in the face. The mining method is well established with many years of operating experience.
|
| • |
The production focus in the short to medium term is the eastern area (Agenaise zone) of the mine. Due to the large horizontal extents of the underground workings, it is more
efficient to concentrate production in one area to avoid long tramming.
|
| • |
The current LOM runs from 2025 to 2045 (inclusive).
|
| 22.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
The operation has a long history of processing potash mineralisation and processing methods are conventional and have been refined over time.
|
| • |
The Súria processing plant has been operating since the early 1950’s. The potash processing facility has undergone an expansion, with the installation of new equipment to allow
production to increase from circa 600,000 tpa of potash product to approximately 1.1 Mtpa and this was completed in 2023. This allows the process plant to process a maximum of approximately 5 Mtpa of ore. The mine continues to ramp up to meet
the processing plant capacity.
|
| • |
Metallurgical recovery achieved in the processing plant in 2024 was 87.0 % and was an increase from 86.5 % achieved in 2023. However, for conservatism Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves have been estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 86.5 %.
|
| 22.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
ICL Iberia has recently completed upgrades to the processing plant, rail load facilities and port facilities to allow transport and export of approximately 2.3 Mtpa of potash and
salt products.
|
| 22.5 |
Environment
|
| • |
Permits held by ICL Iberia for the Property are sufficient to ensure that mining activities are conducted within the regulatory framework required by regulations.
|
| • |
There are currently no known environmental, permitting, or social/community risks that could impact the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves.
|
| 23 |
| 23.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Continue the exploration drilling programmes.
|
| • |
Continue QA/QC programmes for all underground and surface drilling. Consider the use of external pulp duplicates as part of routine QA/QC samples.
|
| • |
Instances of drillhole intersections with economic KCl grades that are not included within the modelled potash seams (due to being off-section during geological interpretation)
should be reviewed by ICL Iberia.
|
| • |
Continue to monitor and review reconciliation of the resource model with production data (broken, stowed and hoisted material) with emphasis on reconciliation of mining losses at
Seam A.
|
| 23.2 |
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
| • |
Continue to optimise the mine planning process through the use of DeswikOps short-term planning analysis, focusing on providing a stable feed grade to the process plant.
|
| • |
Continue to progress teleremote loader operations from surface, to reduce exposure underground and increase operational efficiencies.
|
| • |
Continue spectral imaging studies to identify the white carnallite layer in the northern area of Cabanasses to assist with geotechnical characterisation.
|
| • |
Continue to develop on-going rock mechanics studies.
|
| 23.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
Continue on-going plant optimisation projects.
|
| • |
Continue work to investigate options to reduce the amount of salt for disposal on the dump including the potential for additional saleable salt products.
|
| 23.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Continue using and improving the environmental management system and maintain its ISO accredited standard.
|
| • |
Continue active engagement with local communities and stakeholders through formal and informal projects and outreach.
|
| • |
Continue to monitor and address brine run-off from the salt dumps.
|
| 24 |
| 25 |
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report,
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report, and
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources.
|
| 26 |
|
Qualified Person or Firm
|
Signature
|
Date
|
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
“signed”
|
February 27, 2025
|
|
ICL Iberia Concessions in Barcelona Province; "Potasas De Llobregat"
|
|||||
|
Mining ID
|
Name
|
Area (Ha)
|
Date
Awarded
|
Consolidated
tenure (years)
|
Expires
|
|
1916
|
MONTSERRAT
|
3,276
|
07-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1929
|
EMERIKA
|
766
|
08-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1940
|
NURIA I
|
555
|
08-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1941
|
NURIA II
|
135
|
08-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1943
|
SILVINA
|
300
|
08-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1948
|
NUEVA CARDONA
|
1,164
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1949
|
2ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
1,667
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1953
|
CALAF
|
942
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1958
|
SALINAS VICTORIA
|
1,914
|
08-10-79
|
60
|
2039
|
|
1961
|
5ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
263
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1965
|
LUIS
|
1,200
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1966
|
ENRIQUE
|
643
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1967
|
SALLENT
|
935
|
08-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1969
|
SEGUE
|
160
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1970
|
CASTELLTALLAT
|
300
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1975
|
6ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
48
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1976
|
7ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
247
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1979
|
8ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
145
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1980
|
SALAVINERA
|
263
|
22-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2233
|
DEMASÍA A 7ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
3
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2234
|
DEMASÍA A 8ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
22
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2236
|
DEMASÍA A 6ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
19
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2238
|
1ª DEMASÍA A CALAF
|
8
|
22-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2239
|
2ª DEMASÍA A CALAF
|
7
|
22-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2240
|
3ª DEMASÍA A CALAF
|
6
|
22-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2241
|
4ª DEMASÍA A CALAF
|
11
|
22-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2242
|
DEMASÍA A SEGUE
|
18
|
22-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2243
|
DEMASÍA A CASTELLTALLAT
|
37
|
22-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2420
|
2ª DEMASÍA A NUEVA CARDONA III
|
52
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2422
|
3ª DEMASÍA A NUEVA CARDONA III
|
58
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2423
|
1ª DEMASÍA A NUEVA CARDONA III
|
30
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2532
|
2ª DEMASÍA A NURIA I
|
10
|
08-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2533
|
1ª DEMASÍA A NURIA I
|
6
|
08-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2574
|
DEMASÍA A SALLENT
|
21
|
17-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2639
|
DEMASÍA A NUEVA CARDONA
|
39
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2640
|
DEMASÍA A 2ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
40
|
18-11-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2644
|
3ª DEMASÍA A SALINAS VICTORIA
|
10
|
08-10-79
|
60
|
2039
|
|
2645
|
4ª DEMASÍA A SALINAS VICTORIA
|
5
|
08-10-79
|
60
|
2039
|
|
2646
|
5ª DEMASÍA A SALINAS VICTORIA
|
7
|
08-10-79
|
60
|
2039
|
|
2647
|
6ª DEMASÍA A SALINAS VICTORIA
|
2
|
08-10-79
|
60
|
2039
|
|
2648
|
7ª DEMASÍA A SALINAS VICTORIA
|
16
|
08-10-79
|
60
|
2039
|
|
Total
|
15,350
|
||||
|
ICL Iberia Concessions in Barcelona Province; "Súria K"
|
|||||
|
Mining ID
|
Name
|
Area (Ha)
|
Date
Awarded
|
Consolidated
tenure (years)
|
Expires
|
|
1761
|
ROUMANIE
|
40
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1783
|
NUEVA ROUMANIE
|
16
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1800
|
SALADITA
|
152
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1888
|
NUEVA SALADITA
|
101
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1889
|
SÚRIA
|
14
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1895
|
RESGUARDO
|
38
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1896
|
BORDELAISE
|
857
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1908
|
BARCELONAISE
|
1,355
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1912
|
SAGAZAN
|
458
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1913
|
GERSOISE
|
2,400
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1914
|
AGENAISE
|
3,280
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1919
|
AGENAISE II
|
2,982
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1920
|
ALFA
|
4,843
|
07-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1921
|
BETA
|
2,522
|
07-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1921
|
BETA-DOS
|
313
|
07-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1925
|
KAPPA
|
3,900
|
07-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1931
|
XI
|
3,569
|
07-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1938
|
SAMPASALAS II
|
144
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1944
|
1ª DEMASIA A GERSOISE
|
29
|
27-04-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1945
|
2º DEMASIA A GERSOISE
|
2
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1946
|
DEMASIA A BARCELONAISE Y AGENAISE
|
33
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
1955
|
FRONTERIZA
|
18
|
07-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2424
|
DEMASIA A SAMPASALAS II
|
28
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2535
|
DEMASIA A BARCELONAISE
|
4
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2536
|
3ª DEMASIA A AGENAISE
|
1
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2537
|
2ª DEMASIA A AGENAISE
|
3
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2538
|
DEMASIA A SAGAZAN
|
30
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2539
|
DEMASIA A GERSOISE
|
2
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2540
|
1ª DEMASIA A AGENAISE
|
1
|
02-05-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2634
|
DEMASIA A XI
|
5
|
07-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
Total
|
27,140
|
||||
|
ICL Iberia Concessions in Lleida Province; "Potasas De Llobregat"
|
|||||
|
Mining ID
|
Name
|
Area (Ha)
|
Date
Awarded
|
Consolidated
tenure (years)
|
Expires
|
|
2318
|
PINOS I
|
1,255
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2343
|
3ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
743
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2344
|
PINOS
|
2,021
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2346
|
3ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
107
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2347
|
MOLSOSA
|
98
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2350
|
2ª PINOS
|
661
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2362
|
PINOS TERCERA
|
1,746
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2367
|
SELLES
|
210
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2368
|
BASSAS 2ª
|
41
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2408
|
AMPLIACIÓN A MOLSOSA
|
13
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2418
|
DEMASÍA A BASSAS 2ª
|
4
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2718
|
1ª DEMASÍA A 3ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
6
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2719
|
2ª DEMASÍA A 3ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
7
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2720
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS
|
5
|
11-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2721
|
2ª DEMASÍA A PINOS
|
19
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2722
|
1ª DEMASÍA A SELLES
|
4
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2723
|
2ª DEMASÍA A SELLES
|
8
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2724
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS III
|
35
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2725
|
2ª DEMASÍA A MOLSOSA
|
6
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2726
|
1ª DEMASÍA A MOLSOSA
|
10
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2727
|
DEMASÍA A MOLSOSA
|
4
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2728
|
DEMASÍA A 3ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
10
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2729
|
DEMASÍA A 2ª PINOS
|
7
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2738
|
DEMASÍA A AMPLIACIÓN A MOLSOSA
|
2
|
15-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2739
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS III
|
21
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2740
|
DEMASÍA A SELLES
|
3
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2741
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS
|
4
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2873
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS III
|
22
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2874
|
2ª DEMASÍA A PINOS
|
4
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2876
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS III
|
31
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2877
|
DEMASÍA A AMPLIACIÓN A MOLSOSA
|
2
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2879
|
1ª DEMASÍA A 3ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
3
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2881
|
2ª DEMASÍA A SELLES
|
2
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2883
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS
|
5
|
16-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2884
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS
|
5
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2885
|
2ª DEMASÍA A 3ª NUEVA CARDONA
|
7
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2891
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS
|
3
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2892
|
DEMASÍA A PINOS III
|
4
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
3070
|
AMPLIACIÓN A SALINAS VICTORIA
|
65
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
3073
|
2ª DEMASÍA A 2º PINOS
|
6
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
3074
|
3ª DEMASÍA A 2ª PINOS
|
4
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
3075
|
4ª DEMASÍA A 2º PINOS
|
2
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
3076
|
DEMASÍA A BASSAS 2ª
|
10
|
17-11-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
Total
|
7,225
|
||||
|
ICL Iberia Concessions In Lleida Province; "Súria K"
|
|||||
|
Mining ID
|
Name
|
Area (Ha)
|
Date
Awarded
|
Consolidated
tenure (years)
|
Expires
|
|
2294
|
AGUDA
|
4,500
|
27-04-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2295
|
SAMPASALAS
|
1,417
|
27-04-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2302
|
PI
|
6,120
|
04-06-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2303
|
OMIKRON
|
6,000
|
04-06-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2304
|
RHO
|
1,117
|
04-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2329
|
SAMPASALAS III
|
203
|
27-04-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2331
|
RUBIÓ
|
76
|
27-04-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2334
|
PRECISA
|
132
|
04-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
2886
|
3ª DEMASIA A SAMPASALAS
|
6
|
27-04-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2887
|
2ª DEMASIA A SAMPASALAS
|
5
|
27-04-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
2889
|
1ª DEMASIA A SAMPASALAS
|
2
|
27-04-77
|
60
|
2037
|
|
3080
|
DEMASIA A RHO
|
5
|
04-06-77
|
90
|
2067
|
|
Total
|
19,583
|
||||

|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE ROTEM MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL
February 27, 2025
|
|
Wardell Armstrong (part of SLR)
Baldhu House, Wheal Jane Earth Science Park, Baldhu, Truro, Cornwall, TR3 6EH,
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)1872 560738 www.wardell-armstrong.com
|
|
|
EFFECTIVE DATE:
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
DATE ISSUED:
|
February 27, 2025
|
|
JOB NUMBER:
|
ZT61-2273
|
|
VERSION:
REPORT NUMBER:
STATUS:
|
V2.0
MM1813
Final
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE ROTEM MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL
|
|
|
Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong International Ltd,
Registered in England No. 3813172. Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom
UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Bolton, Bristol, Bury St Edmunds, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh,
Glasgow, Leeds, London, Newcastle upon Tyne and Truro. International Office: Almaty.
|
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
LAND AND PROPERTY
MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING
MINERAL ESTATES
WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE ROTEM MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL
|
|
| 1.1 |
Property Description
|
3 |
|
| 1.2 |
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
4 |
|
| 1.3 |
History
|
4 |
|
| 1.4 |
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
6 |
|
| 1.5 |
Exploration
|
7 |
|
| 1.6 |
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
9 |
|
| 1.7 |
Data Verification
|
10 |
|
| 1.8 |
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
10 |
|
| 1.9 |
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
11 |
|
| 1.10 |
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
12 |
|
| 1.11 |
Mining Methods
|
13 |
|
| 1.12 |
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
15 |
|
| 1.13 |
Infrastructure
|
15 |
|
| 1.14 |
Market Studies
|
15 |
|
| 1.15 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
15 |
|
| 1.16 |
Capital and Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
16 |
|
| 1.17 |
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
16 |
|
| 1.18 |
Recommendations
|
16 |
| 2 | INTRODUCTION | 18 |
| 2.1 | Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report | 18 |
|
| 2.2 | Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits | 18 |
|
| 2.3 | Sources of Information | 20 |
|
| 2.4 | Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports | 21 |
|
| 2.5 | Forward-Looking Statements | 21 |
|
| 2.6 | Units and Abbreviations | 22 |
| 3 | PROPERTY DESCRIPTION | 24 |
| 3.1 | Tenure | 25 |
|
| 3.2 | Agreements | 26 |
|
| 3.3 | Royalties | 26 |
|
| 3.4 | Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements | 27 |
|
| 3.5 | QP Opinion | 29 |
| 4.1 | Accessibility | 30 |
|
| 4.2 | Climate | 30 |
|
| 4.3 | Local Resources | 30 |
|
| 4.4 | Infrastructure | 31 |
|
| 4.5 | Physiography, Vegetation and Fauna | 31 |
|
5.1
|
Ownership, Development and Exploration History
|
33 |
|
|
5.2
|
Production History
|
34 |
|
6.1
|
Regional Geology
|
36 |
|
|
6.2
|
Local and Property Geology
|
37 |
|
|
6.3
|
Mineralisation
|
42 |
|
|
6.4
|
Deposit Type
|
43 |
|
45
|
|
7.1
|
QP Opinion | 47 |
| 48 |
|
8.1
|
Sample Preparation
|
48 |
|
|
8.2
|
Analysis Method
|
48 |
|
|
8.3
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
49 |
|
|
8.4
|
QP Opinion | 52 |
| 53 |
| 9.1 |
Site Visits
|
53 |
|
| 9.2 |
Previous Audits
|
53 |
|
| 9.3 |
Drillhole Database
|
53 |
|
| 9.4 | QP Opinion | 61 |
| 62 |
|
10.1
|
Metallurgical Testwork
|
62 |
|
| 10.2 |
Discussion on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
63 |
|
11.1
|
Summary | 64 |
|
|
11.2
|
Mineral Resource Estimation Methodology | 65 |
|
|
11.3
|
Drillhole Database | 65 |
|
|
11.4
|
Statistical Analysis | 65 |
|
|
11.5
|
Geological Modelling | 66 |
|
|
11.6
|
Boundary Analysis | 73 |
|
|
11.7
|
Grade Capping | 73 |
|
|
11.8
|
Variography | 74 |
|
|
11.9
|
Density | 75 |
|
|
11.10
|
Grade Estimation and Validation | 75 |
|
|
11.11
|
Mineral Resource Classification | 77 |
|
|
11.12
|
Depletion | 78 |
|
|
11.13
|
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources | 78 | |
|
11.14
|
Mineral Resource Statement | 79 |
|
|
11.15
|
Risk Factors that May Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate | 79 |
| 80 |
|
12.1
|
Summary
|
80 |
|
|
12.2
|
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
81 | |
|
12.3
|
Dilution and Mining Recovery
|
81 | |
|
12.4
|
Cut-off Grade
|
81 | |
|
12.5
|
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
82 | |
|
12.6
|
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
82 |
|
13.1
|
Geotechnics and Hydrogeology | 85 |
|
|
13.2
|
Mining Strategy | 85 | |
|
13.3
|
Production | 87 | |
|
13.4
|
Life of Mine Schedule | 87 | |
|
13.5
|
Mining Equipment | 90 | |
|
13.6
|
Mining Personnel | 91 |
| 92 |
|
14.1
|
Oron Beneficiation Plant | 92 |
|
|
14.2
|
Rotem Beneficiation Plant | 94 | |
|
14.3
|
Zin Beneficiation Plant | 96 |
|
14.4
|
Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Facilities | 96 | |
|
14.5
|
Fertilizer Plants | 101 | |
|
14.6
|
Processing Personnel | 103 |
| 104 |
|
15.1
|
Surface Layout
|
104 | |
|
15.2
|
Roads | 105 | |
|
15.3
|
Rail | 106 | |
|
15.4
|
Ports | 106 | |
|
15.5
|
Power | 106 | |
|
15.6
|
Water | 107 | |
|
15.7
|
Tailings Storage Facilities | 107 |
| 108 |
|
16.1
|
Phosphate Market | 108 |
|
|
16.2
|
Demand | 108 |
|
|
16.3
|
Commodity Price Projections | 109 |
|
|
16.4
|
Contracts | 109 |
| 110 |
|
17.1
|
Permitting | 110 |
|
|
17.2
|
ICL Rotem Environmental Organisational Structure | 111 |
|
|
17.3
|
Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) Procedures | 111 |
|
|
17.4
|
Stakeholder Engagement | 114 |
|
|
17.5
|
Mine and Facility Closure Plans
|
114 |
|
|
17.6
|
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
115 |
|
116
|
|
18.1
|
Capital Costs
|
116 |
|
|
18.2
|
Operating Costs
|
116 |
| 19 | ECONOMIC ANALYSIS | 117 |
|
19.1
|
Economic Criteria | 117 |
|
|
19.2
|
Cash Flow Analysis | 118 |
|
|
19.3
|
Sensitivity Analysis | 120 |
| 123 |
| 124 |
|
22.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources | 124 |
|
|
22.2
|
Mining and Mineral Reserves | 124 |
|
|
22.3
|
Mineral Processing | 125 |
|
|
22.4
|
Infrastructure | 125 |
|
|
22.5
|
Environment | 125 |
| 126 |
|
23.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
126 |
|
|
23.2
|
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
126 |
|
|
23.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
126 |
|
|
23.4
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
126 |
| 127 |
| 128 |
|
TABLES
|
|
|
Table 1.1: Rotem Beneficiation Plant Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
5 |
|
Table 1.2: Oron Beneficiation Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
6 |
|
Table 1.3: Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
6 |
|
Table 1.4: Summary of Drilling at Rotem, Oron and Zin Deposits
|
8 |
|
Table 1.5: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Rotem, Oron and Zin Mines
|
12 |
|
Table 1.6: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Rotem, Oron and Zin Mines
|
13 |
|
Table 5.1: Rotem Beneficiation Plant Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
34 |
|
Table 5.2: Oron Beneficiation Plant Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
34 |
|
Table 5.3: Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
35
|
|
Table 7.1: Summary of Drilling at Rotem, Oron and Zin Deposits
|
45 |
|
Table 9.1: Summary Statistical Analysis for P2O5 (%) Composites at Oron
|
54 |
|
Table 9.2: Summary Statistical Analysis for P2O5 (%) Composites at Rotem
|
56 |
|
Table 9.3: Summary Statistical Analysis for P2O5 (%) Composites at Zin
|
58 |
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Rotem, Oron and Zin Mines
|
64 |
|
Table 11.2: Summary of Density Values
|
75 |
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Rotem, Oron and Zin Mines
|
80 |
|
Table 13.1: Total ICL Rotem Mine Production (2020 – 2024)
|
87 |
|
Table 13.2: ICL Rotem Summary of Mining Equipment
|
91 |
|
Table 13.3: ICL Rotem Mining Personnel
|
91 |
|
Table 14.1: Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Plants
|
97 |
|
Table 14.2: ICL Rotem Processing Personnel
|
103 |
|
Table 17.1: Permits and Licences held by ICL Rotem
|
110 |
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for ICL Rotem
|
116 |
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for ICL Rotem
|
116 |
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for ICL Rotem
|
117 |
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for ICL Rotem
|
119 |
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for ICL Rotem
|
120 |
| FIGURES | |
|
Figure 3.1: Location of Rotem, Oron and Zin, Israel
|
24 |
|
Figure 3.2: ICL Rotem New Mining Concession
|
26 |
|
Figure 6.1: Syrian Arc Fold Belt (Modified from Abed, 2013)
|
36 |
|
Figure 6.2: Map of Phosphate Deposits in the Negev (Modified from Bartov et al., 1980)
|
37 |
|
Figure 6.3: Rotem Stratigraphic Column
|
39 |
|
Figure 6.4: Rotem Pit Wall Exposure with Stratigraphic Units Labelled
|
39 |
|
Figure 6.5: Oron Stratigraphic Column
|
40 |
|
Figure 6.6: Oron Pit Wall Exposure with Stratigraphic Units Labelled
|
40 |
|
Figure 6.7: Zin Stratigraphic Column
|
41 |
|
Figure 6.8: Zin Phosphate Exposure from Hagor C Area
|
41 |
|
Figure 6.9: Schematic Vertical Section Across an Oceanic Margin (Simandl et al., 2011)
|
43 |
|
Figure 6.10: Genetic Model for Sedimentary Phosphate Deposits (Modified from Abed, 2013)
|
44 |
|
Figure 7.1: Location of Drillholes (Black Dots) at the Rotem, Oron and Zin Deposits
|
46 |
|
Figure 7.2: Location of Drillholes at the Rotem Deposit (including Hatrurim)
|
46 |
|
Figure 7.3: Location of Drillholes at the Oron and Zin Deposits
|
47 |
|
Figure 8.1: CRM Used by Rotem Laboratory
|
49 |
|
Figure 8.2: Analysis of CRM for P2O5 (%) at the Rotem Laboratory
|
50 |
|
Figure 8.3: Analysis of CRM for Fe2O3 (%) at the Rotem Laboratory
|
50 |
|
Figure 8.4: Analysis of CRM for Al2O3 (%) at the Rotem Laboratory
|
51 |
|
Figure 8.5: Analysis of CRM for MgO (%) at the Rotem Laboratory
|
51 |
|
Figure 9.1: Log Probability and Mean Grade Plots for Upper Phosphate (Top Left), Middle Phosphate (Top Right) and Lower Phosphate
(Bottom) by Drilling Decade at Oron
|
55 |
|
Figure 9.2: Log Probability and Mean Grade Plots for A) Upper Phosphate, B) Lower Phosphate, C) IC1 Phosphate, and D) IC2
Phosphate by Drilling Decade at Rotem
|
57 |
|
Figure 9.3: Log Probability and Mean Grade Plots for A) Phosphate 0, B) Phosphate 1, and C) Phosphate 2 by Drilling Decade
|
59 |
|
Figure 9.4: Log Probability and Mean Grade Plots for D) Phosphate 3 and E) Phosphate 4 by Decade Drilled at Zin
|
60 |
|
Figure 11.1: Histograms of P2O5% Grade for Rotem (Top Left), Oron (Top Right) and Zin (Bottom)
|
66 |
|
Figure 11.2: Isometric View Showing Example of the Geological Model at Rotem
|
67 |
|
Figure 11.3: Seam Modelling Methodology and Showing Mean P2O5 % Grades of Drillholes
|
68 |
|
Figure 11.4: Mean P2O5% Grades for Phosphate Domains and Caprock at Rotem
|
69 |
|
Figure 11.5: Box and Whisker Plot Showing Mean P2O5 Grades for the Phosphate Domains and Caprock at Oron
|
70 |
|
Figure 11.6: Section through Phosphate Seams at Oron 5 Area against Logged Lithology (Top) and Composite Grade (Bottom)
|
71 |
|
Figure 11.7: Cross-Section (Red on Inset) of Phosphate Seams and Overburden at Oron 5 Area
|
71 |
|
Figure 11.8: Example Section of Phosphate Seams at Hagor C Field at Zin
|
72 |
|
Figure 11.9: Box and Whisker Plot Showing Mean P2O5 Grade for the Phosphate Seams and Caprock at Zin
|
72 |
|
Figure 11.10: Example of Boundary Analysis of Lower Phosphate Domain at Rotem for P2O5
|
73 |
|
Figure 11.11: Statistical Analysis for P2O5 Outliers in Upper Phosphate Domain at Oron
|
74 |
|
Figure 11.12: Example of Modelled Variograms for the Middle Phosphate Domain at Oron
|
75 |
|
Figure 11.13: Example Swath Analysis for P2O5 (%) in Upper and Lower Phosphate Seams at Oron
|
76 |
|
Figure 11.14: Log Probability Plots Comparing Estimated P2O5 (%) Grades vs Composite Grades
|
77 |
|
Figure 13.1: Overburden Removal at Rotem
|
83 |
|
Figure 13.2: Drilling for Blasting at Oron
|
84 |
|
Figure 13.3: Ripping of Phosphate Ore at Rotem
|
84 |
|
Figure 13.4: Planned Mining Strips for Life of Mine of Rotem Bituminous Phosphate
|
86 |
|
Figure 13.5: Planned Mining Strips for Life of Mine of Oron Brown Phosphate
|
86 |
|
Figure 13.6: ICL Rotem Life of Mine Schedule
|
89 |
|
Figure 14.1: Overview of ICL Rotem Processing Operations
|
92 |
|
Figure 14.2: Oron Beneficiation Plant Flowsheet
|
93
|
|
Figure 14.3: Rotem Dry Beneficiation Plant 70B
|
95 |
|
Figure 14.4: Rotem Wet Beneficiation Plant 20
|
96 |
|
Figure 14.5: Sulphuric Acid Production
|
98 |
|
Figure 14.6: Phosphoric Acid Production
|
99 |
|
Figure 14.7: White Acid Production
|
101 |
|
Figure 14.8: Phosphorus Fertilizer Production Chemistry
|
101 |
|
Figure 14.9: MAP Production Flowsheet
|
102 |
|
Figure 15.1: Rotem Surface Layout
|
104 |
|
Figure 15.2: Oron Surface Layout
|
105 |
|
Figure 15.3: Oron (Savion) Tailings Storage Facility
|
107 |
|
Figure 17.1: ICL Rotem Environmental Management Department
|
111 |
|
Figure 17.2: Rotem HSE Management Structure
|
112 |
|
Figure 19.1: After-Tax 10% NPV Sensitivity Analysis
|
121 |
| 1 |
| • |
White (<0.25% organic matter)
|
| • |
Low Organic (0.25 to 0.35% organic matter),
|
| • |
Brown and High Organic (>0.35% to 1.0% organic matter)
|
| • |
Bituminous (>1.0% organic matter).
|
| • |
White phosphate rock from Oron is mined and processed at the Oron beneficiation plant and the phosphate concentrate transported to the Rotem plant for further processing
into higher added value products such as white phosphoric acids for food applications.
|
| • |
Low organic phosphate rock from Rotem mine is processed at the Rotem plant to produce green (impure) phosphoric acids for agricultural applications.
|
| • |
Bituminous phosphate rock from the centre of the Rotem deposit is mined and used to produce fertilizers at the Rotem plant. Further significant bituminous phosphate
exists within the deeper parts of the Rotem deposit, however, only limited mining of this has occurred to date due to the presence of thick overburden (10 to 50 meters) containing horizons of oil shale. The oil shale contains 12 -
21 % organic matter and is susceptible to self-combustion when exposed by mining.
|
| • |
The Oron beneficiation plant will be reconfigured to allow brown and low organic phosphate rock to be mined and processed at Oron and the phosphate concentrate
transported to the Rotem plant for use in the production of green phosphoric acid. In addition, brown phosphate rock from Oron will be transported by truck to the Rotem beneficiation plant and used to produce additional green
phosphoric acid and fertilizers after 2029.
|
| • |
The Rotem beneficiation plant will process bituminous phosphate rock mined from Rotem, and the concentrate used in the production of white phosphoric acid. Overburden
containing horizons of oil shale will be stripped to allow access to the underlying bituminous rock. An upper limit of around 20 % of the total overburden will be allowed to contain oil shale and this will be transported to
designated waste dumps and capped using marl rock.
|
| • |
Bituminous phosphate rock from Rotem will also continue to be used to produce fertilizers.
|
| • |
Mining of the available bituminous rock at Rotem to produce white phosphoric acid is planned to be completed by the end of 2029 and the remainder of white phosphate at
Oron will be used for speciality fertilizers.
|
| • |
Small scale mining at Zin of approximately 0.2 Mtpa of low organic phosphate rock is planned to continue for the life of mine (LOM) using in-pit crushing and screening
and final processing at the Oron beneficiation plant.
|
| 1.1 |
Property Description
|
| 1.2 |
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
| 1.3 |
History
|
|
Table 1.1: Rotem Beneficiation Plant Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
||||
|
Rock for Fertilizer
|
||||
|
Feed
|
Concentrate
|
|||
|
Year
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
|
2020
|
793,914
|
29.35
|
507,559
|
31.4
|
|
2021
|
972,694
|
29.68
|
542,993
|
31.3
|
|
2022
|
879,456
|
29.71
|
555,348
|
31.2
|
|
2023
|
865,857
|
29.66
|
549,601
|
31.2
|
|
2024
|
843,120
|
29.49
|
547,913
|
30.9
|
|
Rock for Phosphoric Acid
|
||||
|
Feed
|
Concentrate
|
|||
|
Year
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
|
2020
|
1,731,353
|
30.30
|
886,882
|
31.74
|
|
2021
|
1,707,717
|
29.98
|
879,629
|
31.65
|
|
2022
|
1,503,100
|
28.87
|
726,173
|
31.57
|
|
2023
|
1,705,263
|
27.69
|
880,955
|
30.71
|
|
2024
|
1,386,475
|
28.15
|
859,137
|
30.06
|
|
Table 1.2: Oron Beneficiation Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
||||
|
Feed
|
Concentrate
|
|||
|
Year
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
|
2020
|
2,413,758
|
23.50
|
1,110,677
|
31.30
|
|
2021
|
2,509,017
|
23.19
|
1,103,334
|
31.31
|
|
2022
|
2,358,437
|
22.61
|
975,639
|
31.04
|
|
2023
|
2,358,528
|
22.65
|
966,847
|
30.50
|
|
2024
|
2,479,447
|
22.70
|
1,057,736
|
30.48
|
|
Table 1.3: Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
|||||
|
Year
|
Phosphate Rock* (kt)
|
Green Phosphoric Acid (kt)
|
White Phosphoric Acid (kt)
|
Speciality Fertilizers (kt)
|
Fertilizers
(kt)
|
|
2020
|
3,090
|
544
|
171
|
70
|
920
|
|
2021
|
2,431
|
531
|
168
|
72
|
1,082
|
|
2022
|
2,170
|
508
|
176
|
95
|
1,044
|
|
2023
|
2,309
|
520
|
150
|
78
|
1,033
|
|
2024
|
2,375
|
503
|
154
|
100
|
1,024
|
|
* Figures relate to phosphate concentrate produced by the beneficiation plants
2020 includes production from Zin prior to cessation of operations
|
|||||
| 1.4 |
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
| 1.5 |
Exploration
|
|
Table 1.4: Summary of Drilling at Rotem, Oron and Zin Deposits
|
|||||||
|
Site
|
Decade
|
Number of Drillholes
|
Length of Drilling
|
||||
|
Dust Drilling
|
Core Drilling
|
Combination of Dust and Core
|
Dust Drilling
|
Core Drilling
|
Combination of Dust and Core
|
||
|
Oron
|
50s
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
133
|
0
|
0
|
|
60s
|
148
|
0
|
0
|
1,933
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
70s
|
405
|
0
|
0
|
3,954
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
80s
|
102
|
38
|
0
|
2,930
|
837
|
0
|
|
|
90s
|
481
|
117
|
0
|
10,763
|
2,558
|
0
|
|
|
2000s
|
233
|
15
|
0
|
5,205
|
345
|
0
|
|
|
2010s
|
267
|
7
|
6
|
6,171
|
111
|
44
|
|
|
2020s
|
93
|
4
|
0
|
1,718
|
120
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
1,744
|
181
|
6
|
32,808
|
3,970
|
44
|
|
|
Total Drillholes
|
1,931
|
||||||
|
Total Meters
|
36,822
|
||||||
|
Number of Composite Samples
|
4,508
|
||||||
|
Rotem
(and Hatrurim)
|
60s
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
102
|
0
|
0
|
|
70s
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
724
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
80s
|
72
|
0
|
4
|
2,133
|
0
|
819
|
|
|
90s
|
284
|
11
|
4
|
12,309
|
484
|
57
|
|
|
2000s
|
705
|
41
|
8
|
30,955
|
1,211
|
149
|
|
|
2010s
|
299
|
3
|
1
|
17,018
|
46
|
33
|
|
|
2020s
|
42
|
6
|
0
|
1,994
|
318
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
1,425
|
61
|
17
|
65,232
|
2,058
|
1,058
|
|
|
Total Drillholes
|
1,503
|
||||||
|
Total Meters
|
68,347
|
||||||
|
Number of Composite Samples
|
2,791
|
||||||
|
Zin
|
70s
|
71
|
0
|
0
|
1,499
|
0
|
0
|
|
80s
|
210
|
5
|
1
|
3,188
|
77
|
17
|
|
|
90s
|
268
|
22
|
15
|
5,766
|
314
|
99
|
|
|
2000s
|
1,130
|
129
|
9
|
25,101
|
1,840
|
306
|
|
|
2010s
|
257
|
2
|
7
|
5,510
|
59
|
148
|
|
|
Total
|
1,936
|
158
|
32
|
4,1063
|
2,290
|
570
|
|
|
Total Drillholes
|
2,126
|
||||||
|
Total Meters
|
43,924
|
||||||
|
Number of Composite Samples
|
5,449
|
||||||
| 1.6 |
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
| 1.7 |
Data Verification
|
| • |
Open pit surface geology, mineralisation and lithological descriptions.
|
| • |
Extent of exploration work completed to date.
|
| • |
Review of core/sample logging, sampling, sample preparation and analysis procedures.
|
| • |
Core/sample storage areas.
|
| • |
Analytical laboratory.
|
| • |
Data storage procedures.
|
| • |
Review of drillhole databases.
|
| 1.8 |
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
| 1.9 |
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
|
Table 1.5: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Rotem, Oron and Zin Mines – December 31, 2024
|
|||||||
|
Mine
|
Classification
|
White Phosphate (Mt)
|
Low Organic Phosphate (Mt)
|
Brown Phosphate (Mt)
|
High Organic & Bituminous Phosphate (Mt)
|
Total
(Mt)
|
P2O5
(%)
|
|
Rotem
|
Measured
|
-
|
15.9
|
-
|
62.6
|
78.5
|
28.8
|
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
-
|
15.9
|
-
|
62.6
|
78.5
|
28.8
|
|
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Zin
|
Measured
|
-
|
11.8
|
10.0
|
24.3
|
46.1
|
25.3
|
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
11.8
|
10.0
|
24.3
|
46.1
|
25.3
|
||
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Oron
|
Measured
|
1.3
|
-
|
7.1
|
33.0
|
41.4
|
24.0
|
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
1.3
|
-
|
7.1
|
33.0
|
41.4
|
24.0
|
|
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Total
|
Measured
|
1.3
|
27.7
|
17.1
|
119.9
|
166.0
|
26.6
|
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
1.3
|
27.7
|
17.1
|
119.9
|
166.0
|
26.6
|
|
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Rotem and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
Mineral Resources are reported in-situ and are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Rotem.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Resources are estimated at cut-off grades of 25% P2O5 for Rotem, 20% P2O5 for Oron and 23% P2O5
for Zin and a minimum seam thickness of 0.5m
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities ranging from 1.8 to 1.9 t/m3.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using beneficiation plant metallurgical recoveries of 54% and 69% for Mineral Resources at Rotem, 59% and 60% for Mineral Resources at Oron
and 56% for Mineral Resources at Zin.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average of the previous two years’ prices of $1,178/t FOB for acid products and $424/t FOB for fertilizer products and exchange
rates of NIS:USD of 3.58 and EURO:USD of 0.91.
|
| 1.10 |
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
|
Table 1.6: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Rotem, Oron and Zin Mines – December 31, 2024
|
|||||||
|
Mine
|
Classification
|
White Phosphate (Mt)
|
Low Organic Phosphate (Mt)
|
Brown Phosphate (Mt)
|
High Organic & Bituminous Phosphate (Mt)
|
Total
(Mt)
|
P2O5
(%)
|
|
Rotem
|
Proven
|
-
|
1.3
|
-
|
13.0
|
14.3
|
29.0
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
-
|
1.3
|
-
|
13.0
|
14.3
|
29.0
|
|
|
Zin
|
Proven
|
-
|
3.2
|
-
|
-
|
3.2
|
26.1
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
-
|
3.2
|
-
|
-
|
3.2
|
26.1
|
|
|
Oron
|
Proven
|
3.0
|
2.4
|
57.9
|
-
|
63.3
|
23.9
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
3.0
|
2.4
|
57.9
|
-
|
63.3
|
23.9
|
|
|
Total
|
Proven
|
3.0
|
6.9
|
57.9
|
13.0
|
80.8
|
24.9
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
3.0
|
6.9
|
57.9
|
13.0
|
80.8
|
24.9
|
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Rotem and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves for Rotem and Oron is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants, for Zin it is defined at the
point where ore is delivered to the mobile crusher.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Rotem.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated at cut-off grades of 25% P2O5 for Rotem, 20% P2O5 for Oron and 23% P2O5
for Zin.
|
| 7. |
A minimum mining width of 0.5m was used.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using beneficiation plant metallurgical recoveries of 54% and 69% for Mineral Reserves at Rotem, 59% and 60% for Mineral Reserves at Oron
and 50% for Mineral Reserves at Zin.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average of the previous two years’ prices of $1,178/t FOB for acid products, $424/t FOB for fertilizer products and $114/t FOB for
phosphate rock from Zin, and exchange rates of NIS:USD of 3.58 and EURO:USD of 0.91.
|
| 1.11 |
Mining Methods
|
| • |
Removal of topsoil (where present) up to 0.5 m depth by bulldozer. This material is stockpiled for later use in reclamation.
|
| • |
Overburden removal using hydraulic excavators to load a fleet of haul trucks:
|
| o |
Overburden at Oron is harder and typically requires blasting. Overburden removal is undertaken by contractor and loaded to haul trucks and used to backfill areas of
previous workings as progressive restoration. Waste mining rates at Oron are typically 6 to 7 Mm3 per annum.
|
| o |
Blasting of overburden is not always required at Rotem and free digging can be undertaken. Again, overburden is used for progressive restoration. Waste mining rates for
Rotem are typically 14 to 15 Mm3 per annum.
|
| o |
Working areas are up to 80,000 m2 in surface area and several working areas are active at any one time.
|
| • |
Once overburden removal is complete, phosphate mining is undertaken sequentially in mining blocks as a series of strips. Bulldozers are used to work the phosphate by
ripping 0.5 m high cuts. The ore is pushed into piles for loading by front end loaders into trucks. Typically, two bulldozers work simultaneously in one area. After the phosphate has been piled and loaded, the interburden is removed
in the same manner.
|
| • |
Rotem site: The life of mine at Rotem runs from 2025 to 2029 (inclusive) based on 1.3 Mt of reserves of low organic phosphate that will be mined in 2025 and 13.0 Mt of
reserves of bituminous phosphate for production of fertilizers and white phosphoric acid, with an annual average mining rate of 2.6 Mt in the years 2025 – 2029. Reserves of bituminous phosphate are only reported for areas in which
the total overburden required to be mined contains a maximum of around 20 % oil shale. Significant resources (62.6 Mt) of bituminous phosphate are present beneath an overburden containing higher amounts of oil shale and ICL Rotem
plans further technical studies to assess the potential for mining and stockpiling this overburden.
|
| • |
Oron site: The life of mine at Oron runs from 2025 to 2040 (inclusive) based on 3.0 Mt of reserves of white phosphate rock, with an annual average mining rate of 0.2 Mt
for the years 2025 – 2040, as well as 60.3 Mt of reserves of brown and low organic phosphate, of which 0.6 Mt will be mined in 2025 and 30 Mt in the years 2026-2040 at an annual average mining rate of 2 Mt. In the years 2030 – 2040,
29.7 Mt of brown phosphate rock will be transported to Rotem beneficiation plant for processing to produce additional green phosphoric acid and fertilizers at an annual average mining rate of 2.7 Mt.
|
| • |
Zin site: The life of mine at Zin runs from 2025 to 2040 (inclusive) based on reserves of 3.2 Mt of low organic phosphate for small-scale product sales (using minor
mining equipment located inside the open pit without utilizing the Zin beneficiation plant). Additional resources (11.8 Mt) of low organic phosphate are available at Zin should these be required by ICL Rotem in the future.
|
| 1.12 |
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
| 1.13 |
Infrastructure
|
| 1.14 |
Market Studies
|
| 1.15 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
| 1.16 |
Capital and Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
| 1.17 |
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
| 1.18 |
Recommendations
|
| 1.18.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Implement and monitor a robust QA/QC system which incorporates standards, duplicates and blank samples to document sampling and laboratory performance. Establish further
geological standard samples of varying grades and send to external laboratories for comparison.
|
| • |
The QP recommends that a 3D block modelling approach should be considered by ICL Rotem for future Mineral Resource estimates. This would aid visualisation and
communication of the resource model and integration with mine planning, scheduling and regular reconciliations with production data.
|
| 1.18.2 |
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
| • |
Undertake regular reconciliations of mining production data against the geological model.
|
| • |
Undertake regular reviews of dilution and mining recovery.
|
| 1.18.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
Continue R&D programmes to identify a metallurgical process route to produce white phosphoric acid from brown phosphate rock.
|
| • |
Continue R&D programmes to investigate potential reprocessing of tailings material, which contains on average approximately 17 % P2O5.
|
| • |
Continue R&D programmes to develop saleable products from the gypsum tailings.
|
| 1.18.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Continue active engagement with local communities and stakeholders through formal and informal projects and outreach.
|
| • |
Continue to meet monthly with representatives from the Ministry of Energy and Infrastructures and the Parks Authority to review the active programmes, address any issues
and look for areas for improvements.
|
| • |
Continue to work closely with Be’er Sheva University and the Parks Authority to review the status and benefits of ongoing restoration programmes and identify any areas
for improvement.
|
| • |
Data and information pertaining to current plans to address environmental compliance and local individuals or groups should become more transparent and ICL Rotem should
consider the requirement to disclose this information more clearly and separately from the overall corporate responsibility report and information disclosed on the ICL corporate website.
|
| • |
Whilst the ICL Rotem operation is in a constant state of progressive development and reclamation of depleted open pits, it is recommended that a Mine and Facility Closure
Plan is developed in order to align with accepted international best practice.
|
| 2.1 |
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
| 2.2 |
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
| • |
Active mining areas including Area4/Zefa, Hatrurim, Tamar west & Tamar northwest and inspection of geological outcrops.
|
| • |
Review of overburden removal by contractor using excavator (free-digging) and dump trucks.
|
| • |
Mining of phosphate ore by bulldozers (ripping) and pushing into stockpiles for loading by excavators.
|
| • |
Review of geotechnical conditions of a final pit wall at Zefa area.
|
| • |
In-pit waste rock dumps and gypsum waste dumps.
|
| • |
Rotem beneficiation plant.
|
| • |
Tailings storage facilities (TSFs).
|
| • |
Rail loading facilities.
|
| • |
Truck maintenance workshops.
|
| • |
Technical services office.
|
| • |
Environmental reclamation area at Hatrurim.
|
| • |
Active mining areas at Oron East (white phosphate and low organic phosphate) and inspection of geological outcrops. Review of planned future mining area of Oron North
(brown phosphate) and inspection of geological outcrops.
|
| • |
Preparation of overburden removal site using drilling and blasting.
|
| • |
Overburden removal by contractor including loading by excavators into dump trucks.
|
| • |
Mining of phosphate ore using ripping by bulldozers and pushing into stockpiles for loading by excavators.
|
| • |
Contractor loading of phosphate ore by excavators into road trucks and haulage to Oron beneficiation plant.
|
| • |
Inspection of geotechnical conditions of final pit wall at Oron East.
|
| • |
In-pit waste dumps.
|
| • |
The Oron beneficiation plant.
|
| • |
Flotation tailings storage facilities at Savion and Alon.
|
| • |
Oron environmental reclamation areas.
|
| • |
Small-scale mining activity at Hagor C area and stockpiles.
|
| • |
In pit mobile crusher.
|
| • |
Environmental reclamation area at Saraf area.
|
| 2.3 |
Sources of Information
|
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report.
|
| • |
Documentation for licensing and permitting, published government reports and public information as included in Section 24 (References) of this report and cited in this
report.
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report.
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources as listed below.
|
| • |
Ms. Dganit Hagag, Integration Manager.
|
| • |
Mr. Simon Volin, Geology and Raw Material Manager.
|
| • |
Mr. Andrey Belyakov, Long Range Mine Planning Engineer.
|
| • |
Mr. David Genon, Short and Mid-Range Mine Planning Engineer.
|
| 2.4 |
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
| 2.5 |
Forward-Looking Statements
|
| 2.6 |
Units and Abbreviations
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
°C
|
Degrees Celsius
|
|
2D
|
Two-dimensional
|
|
3D
|
Three-dimensional
|
|
AA
|
Atomic Absorption
|
|
AAS
|
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
|
|
ADT
|
Articulated Dump Truck (mining class of truck)
|
|
AGI
|
American Geologic Institute
|
|
AI
|
Acid Insoluble assays
|
|
Al2O3
|
Aluminium Oxide
|
|
ANFO
|
Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil (bulk explosive)
|
|
BAT
|
Best Available Technology or Best Available Techniques
|
|
BCM or bcm
|
Bank Cubic Meter
|
|
bhp
|
Brake Horse Power
|
|
BOT
|
Build-Operate-Transfer
|
|
Ca2+
|
Calcium ions
|
|
CaCl2
|
Calcium chloride
|
|
CaO
|
Calcium Oxide
|
|
Cd
|
Cadmium
|
|
CEMS
|
Constant Emissions Monitoring Systems
|
|
CO2
|
Carbon dioxide
|
|
COG
|
Cut-off Grade
|
|
CORS
|
Continuously Operating Reference Station
|
|
CRM
|
Certified Reference Materials
|
|
DAP
|
Diammonium Phosphate
|
|
Datamine
|
3D geological modelling, mine design and production planning software
|
|
EA
|
Environmental Assessment
|
|
EDA
|
Exploratory data analysis
|
|
EHS&S
|
Environment, Health, Safety and Sustainability
|
|
EIA
|
Environmental Impact Assessment
|
|
EIS
|
Environmental Impact Statement
|
|
EMS
|
Environmental Management System
|
|
EPR
|
Environmental Permitting Regulations
|
|
ESG
|
Economic and environmental, Social, Governance
|
|
ESIA
|
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
|
|
F
|
Florine
|
|
Fe
|
Iron
|
|
Fe2O3
|
Iron Oxide or ferric oxide
|
|
FOB
|
Free on Board / Freight on Board
|
|
FS
|
Feasibility Study
|
|
GHG
|
Greenhouse Gas
|
|
GIS
|
Geographical Information Services
|
|
GPS
|
Global Positioning System
|
|
GRI
|
Global Reporting Initiative
|
|
GSSP
|
Granular Single Superphosphate
|
|
GTSP
|
Granular Triple Superphosphate
|
|
GWh
|
Gigawatt hour
|
|
H&S
|
Health and Safety
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
Ha
|
Hectare (10,000m2)
|
|
HFO
|
Heavy Fuel Oil
|
|
HNO3
|
Nitric acid
|
|
HQ
|
63.5 mm diameter drill core
|
|
hr
|
Hour/s
|
|
ICL Rotem
|
ICL Rotem (Rotem, Oron and Zin mines, processing plants and logistics facilities)
|
|
ICL
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
ID
|
Identification (number or reference)
|
|
IEC
|
Israeli National Grid
|
|
ILA
|
Israel Lands Administration
|
|
IPPC
|
Integrated Pollution Prevention Control
|
|
K
|
Potassium
|
|
K2O
|
Potassium oxide
|
|
kV
|
Kilovolt
|
|
kW
|
Kilowatt
|
|
kWh
|
Kilowatt hour
|
|
kWh/t
|
Kilowatt hour per tonne
|
|
LFO
|
Light Fuel Oil
|
|
LIMS
|
Laboratory Information Management System
|
|
LOM
|
Life of Mine
|
|
LTA
|
Lost Time Analysis
|
|
M
|
Million(s)
|
|
Ma
|
Million years ago
|
|
MAP
|
Mono Ammonium Phosphate
|
|
MAPGIS
|
GIS Mapping Software
|
|
mbsl
|
Metres below sea level
|
|
MGA
|
Merchant Grade Acid
|
|
MgCl2
|
Magnesium chloride
|
|
MgO
|
Magnesium Oxide
|
|
MKP
|
Mono Ammonium Phosphate + Potash
|
|
MOP
|
Muriate of potash
|
|
MPK
|
Water-soluble Fertilizer
|
|
MRMR
|
Mining Rock Mass Rating
|
|
Mtpa
|
Million tonnes per annum
|
|
MW
|
Megawatt
|
|
MWh
|
Megawatt hour
|
|
NaCl
|
Sodium Chloride (salt)
|
|
NEGEV
|
Negev Energy Ashalim Thermo-Solar Ltd. (Israeli Natural Gas Grid Supplier)
|
|
NPS
|
Mono Ammonium Phosphate+ Sulphur
|
|
NQ
|
47.6 mm diameter drill core
|
|
OEE
|
Overall Equipment Effectiveness
|
|
P2O5
|
Phosphorus pentoxide
|
|
Pa
|
Pascal (measurement of vacuum gas pressure)
|
|
PFS
|
Prefeasibility Study
|
|
ppm
|
parts per million
|
|
QA/QC
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
|
QMS
|
Quality Management System
|
|
QP
|
Qualified Person
|
|
RAB
|
Rotary Air Blast
|
|
RMR
|
Rock Mass Rating
|
|
ROM
|
Run of Mine
|
|
rpm
|
revolutions per minute
|
|
SEC
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
SiO2
|
Silicon Dioxide
|
|
SLR
|
SLR Consulting Limited
|
|
SRM
|
Standard Reference Materials
|
|
SSP
|
Single Superphosphate
|
|
t
|
Tonne metric unit of mass (1,000kg or 2,204.6 lb)
|
|
t/a or tpa
|
Tonnes per annum
|
|
t/d or tpd
|
Tonnes per day
|
|
t/h or tph
|
Tonnes per hour
|
|
TSF
|
Tailings Storage Facility
|
|
TOC
|
Total Organic Carbon
|
|
TRS
|
(S-K 1300) Technical Report Summary
|
|
TSP
|
Triple Super Phosphate
|
|
UTM
|
Universal Transverse Mercator
|
|
Vulcan
|
3D geological modelling, mine design and production planning software
|
|
WAI
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
|
XRD
|
X-ray powder Diffraction
|
|
XRF
|
X-ray powder Fluorescence
|
| 3 |

| 3.1 |
Tenure
|

| 3.2 |
Agreements
|
| 3.3 |
Royalties
|
| 3.4 |
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
| 3.4.1 |
Mining Concession and Licenses
|
| 3.4.2 |
Emission Permit
|
| 3.4.3 |
Phosphogypsum Storage
|
| 3.4.4 |
An Application for a Class Action (Zin)
|
| 3.4.5 |
An Application for a Class Action (Bokek)
|
| 3.5 |
QP Opinion
|
| 4 |
| 4.1 |
Accessibility
|
| 4.2 |
Climate
|
| 4.3 |
Local Resources
|
| 4.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
Open pit mines at Rotem, Oron and Zin.
|
| • |
Rotem and Oron Beneficiation plants (Zin plant is non-operational).
|
| • |
Fertilizer and acid processing facilities (Rotem).
|
| • |
Run of Mine (ROM) conveyor/crusher systems.
|
| • |
Stockpiles.
|
| • |
Waste dumps.
|
| • |
Tailings Storage Facilities (TSFs) including flotation TSFs and gypsum TSFs.
|
| • |
Rail transportation facilities and load outs.
|
| • |
Road haulage facilities and load outs. Includes road haulage of around 1 Mtpa of phosphate concentrate from Oron to Rotem by 40 t road-going rigid trucks and trailers
operated by ICL Tovala.
|
| • |
Railhead at Tzefa.
|
| • |
Power:
|
| o |
Rotem - electricity generated from sulphuric acid plants; supply from national electricity grid; and gas combustion from national gas network (replacing previous oil
shale combustion).
|
| o |
Oron and Zin – supplied by national electricity grid.
|
| • |
Process and potable water sources – supplied by national water network.
|
| • |
Truckstops and truck washes.
|
| • |
Stores and workshops.
|
| • |
Mine offices and change houses.
|
| • |
Administration offices.
|
| • |
Cafeterias.
|
| • |
Medical services facilities.
|
| • |
Sample preparation facility (Oron).
|
| • |
Analytical laboratory (Rotem).
|
| • |
Research and development facility.
|
| • |
Explosive magazines.
|
| • |
Port facilities and storage at Ashdod and Eilat (including rail load out at Ashdod).
|
| • |
Sulphur dispatch facility (5 km from Ashdod).
|
| 4.5 |
Physiography, Vegetation and Fauna
|
| 5 |
HISTORY
|
| 5.1 |
Ownership, Development and Exploration History
|
| 5.2 |
Production History
|
| 5.2.1 |
Rotem Beneficiation Plant
|
|
Table 5.1: Rotem Beneficiation Plant Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
||||
|
Rock for Fertilizer
|
||||
|
Feed
|
Concentrate
|
|||
|
Year
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
|
2020
|
793,914
|
29.35
|
507,559
|
31.4
|
|
2021
|
972,694
|
29.68
|
542,993
|
31.3
|
|
2022
|
879,456
|
29.71
|
555,348
|
31.2
|
|
2023
|
865,857
|
29.66
|
549,601
|
31.2
|
|
2024
|
843,120
|
29.49
|
547,913
|
30.9
|
|
Rock for Phosphoric Acid
|
||||
|
Feed
|
Concentrate
|
|||
|
Year
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
|
2020
|
1,731,353
|
30.30
|
886,882
|
31.74
|
|
2021
|
1,707,717
|
29.98
|
879,629
|
31.65
|
|
2022
|
1,503,100
|
28.87
|
726,173
|
31.57
|
|
2023
|
1,705,263
|
27.69
|
880,955
|
30.71
|
|
2024
|
1,386,475
|
28.15
|
859,137
|
30.06
|
| 5.2.2 |
Oron Beneficiation Plant
|
|
Table 5.2: Oron Beneficiation Plant Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
||||
|
Feed
|
Concentrate
|
|||
|
Year
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
Tonnes
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
|
|
2020
|
2,413,758
|
23.50
|
1,110,677
|
31.30
|
|
2021
|
2,509,017
|
23.19
|
1,103,334
|
31.31
|
|
2022
|
2,358,437
|
22.61
|
975,639
|
31.04
|
|
2023
|
2,358,528
|
22.65
|
966,847
|
30.50
|
|
2024
|
2,479,447
|
22.70
|
1,057,736
|
30.48
|
| 5.2.3 |
Zin Beneficiation Plant
|
| 5.2.4 |
Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Production
|
|
Table 5.3: Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Production (Previous 5 Years)
|
|||||
|
Year
|
Phosphate Rock* (kt)
|
Green Phosphoric Acid (kt)
|
White Phosphoric Acid (kt)
|
Speciality Fertilizers (kt)
|
Fertilizers
(kt)
|
|
2020
|
3,090
|
544
|
171
|
70
|
920
|
|
2021
|
2,431
|
531
|
168
|
72
|
1,082
|
|
2022
|
2,170
|
508
|
176
|
95
|
1,044
|
|
2023
|
2,309
|
520
|
150
|
78
|
1,033
|
|
2024
|
2,375
|
503
|
154
|
100
|
1,024
|
|
* Figures relate to phosphate concentrate produced by the beneficiation plants
2020 includes production from Zin prior to cessation of operations
|
|||||
| 6 |
| 6.1 |
Regional Geology
|

| 6.2 |
Local and Property Geology
|







| 6.3 |
Mineralization
|
| • |
White <0.25 % organic matter.
|
| • |
Low organic: 0.25-0.35 % organic matter.
|
| • |
High organic and Brown: >0.35-.1.0% organic matter.
|
| • |
Bituminous: >1.0% organic matter.
|
| 6.3.1 |
Rotem
|
| 6.3.2 |
Oron
|
| 6.3.3 |
Zin
|
| 6.4 |
Deposit Type
|


| 7 |
|
Table 7.1: Summary of Drilling at Rotem, Oron and Zin Deposits
|
|||||||
|
Site
|
Decade
|
Number of Drillholes
|
Length of Drilling
|
||||
|
Dust Drilling
|
Core Drilling
|
Combination of Dust and Core
|
Dust Drilling
|
Core Drilling
|
Combination of Dust and Core
|
||
|
Oron
|
50s
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
133
|
0
|
0
|
|
60s
|
148
|
0
|
0
|
1,933
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
70s
|
405
|
0
|
0
|
3,954
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
80s
|
102
|
38
|
0
|
2,930
|
837
|
0
|
|
|
90s
|
481
|
117
|
0
|
10,763
|
2,558
|
0
|
|
|
2000s
|
233
|
15
|
0
|
5,205
|
345
|
0
|
|
|
2010s
|
267
|
7
|
6
|
6,171
|
111
|
44
|
|
|
2020s
|
93
|
4
|
0
|
1,718
|
120
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
1,744
|
181
|
6
|
32,808
|
3,970
|
44
|
|
|
Total Drillholes
|
1,931
|
||||||
|
Total Meters
|
36,822
|
||||||
|
Number of Composite Samples
|
4,508
|
||||||
|
Rotem
(and Hatrurim)
|
60s
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
102
|
0
|
0
|
|
70s
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
724
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
80s
|
72
|
0
|
4
|
2,133
|
0
|
819
|
|
|
90s
|
284
|
11
|
4
|
12,309
|
484
|
57
|
|
|
2000s
|
705
|
41
|
8
|
30,955
|
1,211
|
149
|
|
|
2010s
|
299
|
3
|
1
|
17,018
|
46
|
33
|
|
|
2020s
|
42
|
6
|
0
|
1,994
|
318
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
1,425
|
61
|
17
|
65,232
|
2,058
|
1,058
|
|
|
Total Drillholes
|
1,503
|
||||||
|
Total Meters
|
68,347
|
||||||
|
Number of Composite Samples
|
2,791
|
||||||
|
Zin
|
70s
|
71
|
0
|
0
|
1,499
|
0
|
0
|
|
80s
|
210
|
5
|
1
|
3,188
|
77
|
17
|
|
|
90s
|
268
|
22
|
15
|
5,766
|
314
|
99
|
|
|
2000s
|
1,130
|
129
|
9
|
25,101
|
1,840
|
306
|
|
|
2010s
|
257
|
2
|
7
|
5,510
|
59
|
148
|
|
|
Total
|
1,936
|
158
|
32
|
4,1063
|
2,290
|
570
|
|
|
Total Drillholes
|
2,126
|
||||||
|
Total Meters
|
43,924
|
||||||
|
Number of Composite Samples
|
5,449
|
||||||



| 7.1 |
QP Opinion
|
| 8 |
| 8.1 |
Sample Preparation
|
| 8.2 |
Analysis Method
|
| 8.2.1 |
P2O5 Analysis
|
| 8.2.2 |
Analysis of Other Elements
|
| 8.3 |
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|





| 8.4 |
QP Opinion
|
| 9 |
| 9.1 |
Site Visits
|
| • |
Open pit surface geology, mineralisation and lithological descriptions.
|
| • |
Extent of exploration work completed to date.
|
| • |
Review of core/sample logging, sampling, sample preparation and analysis procedures.
|
| • |
Core/sample storage areas.
|
| • |
Analytical laboratory.
|
| • |
Data storage procedures.
|
| • |
Review of drillhole databases.
|
| 9.2 |
Previous Audits
|
| 9.3 |
Drillhole Database
|
| 9.3.1 |
Statistical Comparison of P2O5 Assays by Drilling Year
|
|
Table 9.1: Summary Statistical Analysis for P2O5 (%) Composites at Oron
|
||||||||
|
Phosphate Layer
|
Decade
|
№ of Composites
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
Upper Phosphate
|
1950
|
10
|
20.5
|
27.0
|
25.1
|
3.5
|
1.9
|
0.08
|
|
1960
|
116
|
20.1
|
29.6
|
24.9
|
3.2
|
1.8
|
0.07
|
|
|
1970
|
143
|
18.1
|
28.4
|
24.6
|
3.0
|
1.7
|
0.07
|
|
|
1980
|
87
|
16.0
|
30.2
|
23.9
|
6.5
|
2.5
|
0.11
|
|
|
1990
|
491
|
15.0
|
33.1
|
24.7
|
4.5
|
2.1
|
0.09
|
|
|
2000
|
132
|
0.2
|
29.7
|
24.1
|
10.8
|
3.3
|
0.14
|
|
|
2010
|
178
|
14.9
|
29.1
|
24.0
|
9.1
|
3.0
|
0.13
|
|
|
2020
|
30
|
3.0
|
29.1
|
22.9
|
22.0
|
4.7
|
0.20
|
|
|
Total
|
1,206
|
0.2
|
33.1
|
24.4
|
6.3
|
2.5
|
0.10
|
|
|
Middle Phosphate
|
1950
|
12
|
22.0
|
25.8
|
24.2
|
1.7
|
1.3
|
0.05
|
|
1960
|
134
|
17.4
|
27.8
|
24.5
|
2.2
|
1.5
|
0.06
|
|
|
1970
|
263
|
15.3
|
27.8
|
23.5
|
2.5
|
1.6
|
0.07
|
|
|
1980
|
93
|
16.3
|
27.8
|
23.1
|
4.1
|
2.0
|
0.09
|
|
|
1990
|
528
|
15.7
|
29.8
|
23.9
|
4.1
|
2.0
|
0.09
|
|
|
2000
|
160
|
10.7
|
28.8
|
23.1
|
6.6
|
2.6
|
0.11
|
|
|
2010
|
206
|
11.2
|
28.0
|
22.9
|
9.1
|
3.0
|
0.13
|
|
|
2020
|
40
|
11.4
|
30.0
|
22.2
|
18.1
|
4.3
|
0.19
|
|
|
Total
|
1,457
|
10.7
|
30.0
|
23.6
|
5.3
|
2.3
|
0.10
|
|
|
Lower Phosphate
|
1950
|
8
|
24.0
|
26.0
|
24.9
|
0.5
|
0.7
|
0.03
|
|
1960
|
171
|
19.9
|
29.5
|
25.0
|
4.0
|
2.0
|
0.08
|
|
|
1970
|
471
|
16.6
|
29.4
|
24.1
|
5.6
|
2.4
|
0.10
|
|
|
1980
|
108
|
19.0
|
28.9
|
24.4
|
4.9
|
2.2
|
0.09
|
|
|
1990
|
587
|
1.6
|
30.0
|
24.0
|
18.7
|
4.3
|
0.18
|
|
|
2000
|
219
|
15.8
|
30.0
|
24.4
|
5.2
|
2.3
|
0.09
|
|
|
2010
|
211
|
15.0
|
29.8
|
25.2
|
6.8
|
2.6
|
0.10
|
|
|
2020
|
50
|
14.8
|
27.2
|
22.4
|
10.9
|
3.3
|
0.15
|
|
|
Total
|
1,845
|
1.6
|
30.0
|
24.3
|
10.1
|
3.2
|
0.13
|
|

|
Table 9.2: Summary Statistical Analysis for P2O5 (%) Composites at Rotem
|
||||||||
|
Phosphate Layer
|
Decade
|
№ of Composites
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
Upper Phosphate
|
1960
|
5
|
18.9
|
28.8
|
25.2
|
12.8
|
3.6
|
0.14
|
|
1970
|
17
|
21
|
25.9
|
23.3
|
1.8
|
1.4
|
0.06
|
|
|
1980
|
57
|
18.6
|
27.3
|
23.7
|
3.1
|
1.8
|
0.08
|
|
|
1990
|
216
|
15.1
|
32.3
|
24.9
|
5.9
|
2.4
|
0.10
|
|
|
2000
|
437
|
16
|
31.1
|
24.2
|
4.5
|
2.1
|
0.09
|
|
|
2010
|
125
|
18.6
|
30.2
|
24.4
|
4.6
|
2.2
|
0.09
|
|
|
2020
|
16
|
19.5
|
24.7
|
22.4
|
1.9
|
1.4
|
0.06
|
|
|
Total
|
878
|
15.1
|
32.3
|
24.3
|
4.9
|
2.2
|
0.09
|
|
|
Lower Phosphate
|
1970
|
17
|
29.3
|
33.8
|
31.1
|
1
|
1
|
0.03
|
|
1980
|
40
|
28.2
|
32.8
|
31
|
1.2
|
1.1
|
0.04
|
|
|
1990
|
168
|
25.1
|
34.3
|
31.2
|
3
|
1.7
|
0.05
|
|
|
2000
|
384
|
15.8
|
33.8
|
30.9
|
3.9
|
2
|
0.06
|
|
|
2010
|
86
|
24.1
|
33.7
|
30.9
|
2.2
|
1.5
|
0.05
|
|
|
2020
|
1
|
30.6
|
30.6
|
30.6
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
|
|
Total
|
701
|
15.8
|
34.3
|
31.0
|
3.2
|
1.8
|
0.06
|
|
|
IC1 Phosphate
|
1970
|
15
|
22.3
|
26.6
|
24.6
|
1.7
|
1.3
|
0.05
|
|
1980
|
83
|
15.7
|
28.9
|
22.8
|
7.3
|
2.7
|
0.12
|
|
|
1990
|
225
|
15.6
|
32.7
|
24.4
|
12.9
|
3.6
|
0.15
|
|
|
2000
|
426
|
12.2
|
31.7
|
23.5
|
8.3
|
2.9
|
0.12
|
|
|
2010
|
226
|
18.5
|
33.6
|
27.6
|
10
|
3.2
|
0.12
|
|
|
2020
|
28
|
19.3
|
30.4
|
24.8
|
8
|
2.8
|
0.11
|
|
|
Total
|
1,005
|
12.2
|
33.6
|
24.6
|
12.4
|
3.5
|
0.14
|
|
|
IC2 Phosphate
|
1980
|
28
|
20.7
|
32.3
|
27.8
|
10.8
|
3.3
|
0.12
|
|
1990
|
31
|
18.5
|
13.6
|
26.1
|
12.8
|
3.6
|
0.14
|
|
|
2000
|
76
|
16.3
|
33.5
|
28.3
|
13.8
|
3.7
|
0.13
|
|
|
2010
|
69
|
20.5
|
33.1
|
29.5
|
8.5
|
2.9
|
0.10
|
|
|
2020
|
3
|
23.9
|
30.8
|
26.6
|
9.1
|
3
|
0.11
|
|
|
Total
|
207
|
16.3
|
33.5
|
28.3
|
12.7
|
3.6
|
0.13
|
|
|
Table 9.3: Summary Statistical Analysis for P2O5 (%) Composites at Zin
|
||||||||
|
Phosphate Layer
|
Decade
|
№ of Composites
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Variance
|
Standard Deviation
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
Phosphate 0
|
1980
|
3
|
22
|
24.9
|
23
|
1.7
|
1.3
|
0.06
|
|
1990
|
10
|
20.6
|
27.5
|
24.4
|
4.2
|
2
|
0.08
|
|
|
2000
|
116
|
15.6
|
27.1
|
22.7
|
6.6
|
2.6
|
0.11
|
|
|
2010
|
34
|
17.3
|
29.3
|
23.9
|
4.8
|
2.2
|
0.09
|
|
|
Total
|
165
|
15.6
|
29.3
|
23.1
|
6.4
|
2.5
|
0.11
|
|
|
Phosphate 1
|
1970
|
65
|
20.4
|
28.3
|
24.4
|
3.4
|
1.8
|
0.07
|
|
1980
|
226
|
20.6
|
31.1
|
25.4
|
4.2
|
2
|
0.08
|
|
|
1990
|
237
|
14.4
|
30.4
|
24.9
|
8.2
|
2.9
|
0.12
|
|
|
2000
|
1,001
|
14.9
|
33
|
25.1
|
9.1
|
2.7
|
0.11
|
|
|
2010
|
129
|
18.2
|
28.3
|
24.4
|
3.3
|
1.8
|
0.07
|
|
|
Total
|
1,660
|
14.4
|
33
|
25.1
|
6.5
|
2.5
|
0.10
|
|
|
Phosphate 2
|
1970
|
92
|
22
|
31
|
27
|
3.4
|
1.9
|
0.07
|
|
1980
|
253
|
21.7
|
36.4
|
27.4
|
3.7
|
1.9
|
0.07
|
|
|
1990
|
204
|
16.2
|
32.1
|
25.8
|
7
|
2.6
|
0.10
|
|
|
2000
|
926
|
11
|
32.2
|
26
|
8.3
|
2.9
|
0.11
|
|
|
2010
|
94
|
1.6
|
29.8
|
24.9
|
12.4
|
3.5
|
0.14
|
|
|
Total
|
1,576
|
1.6
|
36.4
|
26.2
|
7.7
|
2.8
|
0.11
|
|
|
Phosphate 3
|
1970
|
83
|
20.4
|
31
|
25.5
|
8.2
|
2.9
|
0.11
|
|
1980
|
170
|
20.3
|
31.2
|
26.6
|
5.2
|
2.3
|
0.09
|
|
|
1990
|
197
|
18.5
|
31
|
25.3
|
5.4
|
2.3
|
0.09
|
|
|
2000
|
903
|
2.4
|
32.7
|
24.9
|
7.6
|
2.8
|
0.11
|
|
|
2010
|
80
|
20.4
|
31
|
25.1
|
5.1
|
2.3
|
0.09
|
|
|
Total
|
1,417
|
2.4
|
32.7
|
25.2
|
7.3
|
2.7
|
0.11
|
|
|
Phosphate 4
|
1980
|
40
|
23.5
|
29.5
|
26.2
|
1.5
|
1.2
|
0.05
|
|
1990
|
27
|
21.1
|
28.9
|
25.9
|
4.6
|
2.2
|
0.08
|
|
|
2000
|
97
|
19.6
|
30.5
|
25.7
|
3.7
|
1.9
|
0.07
|
|
|
2010
|
438
|
19.3
|
30.5
|
26.1
|
4.1
|
2
|
0.08
|
|
|
Total
|
631
|
19.3
|
30.5
|
26.0
|
3.9
|
2
|
0.08
|
|


| 9.3.2 |
Review of Drillhole Databases
|
| • |
Review of geological and geographical setting of the Rotem, Oron and Zin deposits;
|
| • |
Review of extent of the exploration work completed to date;
|
| • |
Inspection of drill samples to assess the nature of the mineralisation and to confirm geological descriptions;
|
| • |
Inspection of geology and mineralisation exposed in the open pits at Rotem, Oron and Zin;
|
| • |
Review of drilling, logging, sampling and analysis procedures;
|
| • |
An evaluation of minimum and maximum grade values and sample lengths;
|
| • |
Assessing for inconsistencies in spelling or coding (typographic or case sensitive errors);
|
| • |
Ensuring full data entry for each drillhole and that a specific data type (collar, survey, lithology and assay) is not missing;
|
| • |
Assessing for sample gaps and overlaps;
|
| • |
A review of assay detection limits;
|
| • |
Identification of problematic assay records;
|
| • |
A spatial on-screen review of the grade and lithology distributions of the drillholes was undertaken to identify any additional data reliability issues; and
|
| • |
A review of collar locations in relation to surface topography.
|
| 9.4 |
QP Opinion
|
| 10 |
| 10.1 |
Metallurgical Testwork
|
| 10.1.1 |
Oron Brown Phosphate
|
| 10.1.2 |
Rotem Bituminous Phosphate
|
| 10.2 |
Discussion on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
| 11 |
| 11.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Rotem, Oron and Zin Mines – December 31,
2024
|
|||||||
|
Mine
|
Classification
|
White Phosphate (Mt)
|
Low Organic Phosphate (Mt)
|
Brown Phosphate (Mt)
|
High Organic & Bituminous Phosphate (Mt)
|
Total
(Mt)
|
P2O5
(%)
|
|
Rotem
|
Measured
|
-
|
15.9
|
-
|
62.6
|
78.5
|
28.8
|
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
-
|
15.9
|
-
|
62.6
|
78.5
|
28.8
|
|
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Zin
|
Measured
|
-
|
11.8
|
10.0
|
24.3
|
46.1
|
25.3
|
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
11.8
|
10.0
|
24.3
|
46.1
|
25.3
|
||
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Oron
|
Measured
|
1.3
|
-
|
7.1
|
33.0
|
41.4
|
24.0
|
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
1.3
|
-
|
7.1
|
33.0
|
41.4
|
24.0
|
|
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Total
|
Measured
|
1.3
|
27.7
|
17.1
|
119.9
|
166.0
|
26.6
|
|
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
1.3
|
27.7
|
17.1
|
119.9
|
166.0
|
26.6
|
|
|
Inferred
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Rotem and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
Mineral Resources are reported in-situ and are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Rotem.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
The Mineral Resource estimate has an effective date of December 31, 2024.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated at cut-off grades of 25% P2O5 for Rotem, 20% P2O5 for Oron and 23% P2O5
for Zin and a minimum seam thickness of 0.5m
|
| 8. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities ranging from 1.8 to 1.9 t/m3.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using beneficiation plant metallurgical recoveries of 54% and 69% for Mineral Resources at Rotem, 59% and 60% for Mineral Resources at
Oron and 56% for Mineral Resources at Zin.
|
| 10. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average of the previous two years’ prices of $1,178/t FOB for acid products and $424/t FOB for fertilizer products and
exchange rates of NIS:USD of 3.58 and EURO:USD of 0.91.
|
| 11.2 |
Mineral Resource Estimation Methodology
|
| 11.3 |
Drillhole Database
|
| 11.4 |
Statistical Analysis
|

| 11.5 |
Geological Modelling
|
| 11.5.1 |
Introduction
|


| 11.5.2 |
Rotem
|

| 11.5.3 |
Oron
|
| • |
Oron east, Oron north, and Oron 4A – mainly consisting of white phosphate
|
| • |
Oron 3 and northern Oron, and 4BetGimel - mainly consisting of low organic phosphate
|
| • |
Oron 4 BetGimel, Oron 5 and Oron 6 – mainly consisting of brown phosphate.
|



| 11.5.4 |
Zin
|


| 11.6 |
Boundary Analysis
|

| 11.7 |
Grade Capping
|

| 11.8 |
Variography
|

| 11.9 |
Density
|
|
Table 11.2: Summary of Density Values
|
|||
|
Deposit
|
Layer
|
Density Testwork
(mean value in t/m3)
|
Density Values Used
For Mineral Resource Estimation (t/m3)
|
|
Oron
|
Upper Phosphate
|
1.96
|
1.9
|
|
Middle Phosphate
|
1.93
|
1.8
|
|
|
Lower Phosphate
|
1.89
|
1.8
|
|
|
Zin
|
All
|
1.80
|
1.8
|
|
Rotem
|
All
|
1.77
|
1.8
|
| 11.10 |
Grade Estimation and Validation
|
| 11.11 |
Mineral Resource Classification
|
| 11.12 |
Depletion
|
| 11.13 |
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Rotem beneficiation plant:
|
| o |
54 % for the current production scenario including low organic phosphate and bituminous phosphate for fertilizers.
|
| o |
69 % for bituminous phosphate for white phosphoric acid and fertilizers.
|
| o |
60 % for brown phosphate rock (from Oron) for green phosphoric acid and fertilizers.
|
| • |
Oron beneficiation plant:
|
| o |
59 % for the current production scenario including white phosphate.
|
| o |
60 % for brown phosphate for green phosphoric acid.
|
| • |
Zin:
|
| o |
56 % based on the historical large-scale mining operation at Zin. The Zin beneficiation plant will not be used for any future processing of phosphate rock, processing
can be undertaken at either Oron or Rotem and the concentrate used for production of acids or fertilizers.
|
| 11.14 |
Mineral Resource Statement
|
| 11.15 |
Risk Factors that May Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
| 12 |
| 12.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Rotem, Oron and Zin Mines
– December 31, 2024
|
|||||||
|
Mine
|
Classification
|
White Phosphate (Mt)
|
Low Organic Phosphate (Mt)
|
Brown Phosphate (Mt)
|
High Organic & Bituminous Phosphate (Mt)
|
Total
(Mt)
|
P2O5
(%)
|
|
Rotem
|
Proven
|
-
|
1.3
|
-
|
13.0
|
14.3
|
29.0
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
-
|
1.3
|
-
|
13.0
|
14.3
|
29.0
|
|
|
Zin
|
Proven
|
-
|
3.2
|
-
|
-
|
3.2
|
26.1
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
-
|
3.2
|
-
|
-
|
3.2
|
26.1
|
|
|
Oron
|
Proven
|
3.0
|
2.4
|
57.9
|
-
|
63.3
|
23.9
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
3.0
|
2.4
|
57.9
|
-
|
63.3
|
23.9
|
|
|
Total
|
Proven
|
3.0
|
6.9
|
57.9
|
13.0
|
80.8
|
24.9
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
3.0
|
6.9
|
57.9
|
13.0
|
80.8
|
24.9
|
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Rotem and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves for Rotem and Oron is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants, for Zin it is defined at
the point where ore is delivered to the mobile crusher.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Rotem.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated at cut-off grades of 25% P2O5 for Rotem, 20% P2O5 for Oron and 23% P2O5
for Zin.
|
| 7. |
A minimum mining width of 0.5m was used.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using beneficiation plant metallurgical recoveries of 54% and 69% for Mineral Reserves at Rotem, 59% and 60% for Mineral Reserves at
Oron and 50% for Mineral Reserves at Zin.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average of the previous two years’ prices of $1,178/t FOB for acid products, $424/t FOB for fertilizer products and $114/t FOB
for phosphate rock from Zin, and exchange rates of NIS:USD of 3.58 and EURO:USD of 0.91.
|
| 12.2 |
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
| • |
Tonnes of in situ phosphate rock.
|
| • |
Recoverable tonnes (tonnes of phosphate rock that can be mined taking into account planned and unplanned mining dilution and mining recovery).
|
| • |
Stripping ratio (the quantity of waste removed per tonne of phosphate rock mined).
|
| • |
Cost per tonne for mining (typically related to transport distance to beneficiation plant).
|
| • |
Cost per tonne including reclamation.
|
| • |
Beneficiation plant recovery.
|
| 12.3 |
Dilution and Mining Recovery
|
| 12.4 |
Cut-off Grade
|
| • |
Rotem beneficiation plant:
|
| o |
54 % for the current production scenario including low organic phosphate and bituminous phosphate for fertilizers.
|
| o |
69 % for bituminous phosphate for white phosphoric acid and fertilizers.
|
| o |
60 % for brown phosphate (from Oron) for green phosphoric acid and fertilizers.
|
| • |
Oron beneficiation plant:
|
| o |
59 % for the current production scenario including white phosphate.
|
| o |
60 % for brown phosphate for green phosphoric acid.
|
| • |
Zin:
|
| o |
50 % based on small scale mining of phosphate rock for further beneficiation at the Oron plant.
|
| 12.5 |
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
| 12.6 |
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
| 13 |
| • |
Removal of topsoil (where present) up to 0.5 m depth by bulldozer. This material is stockpiled for later use in reclamation.
|
| • |
Overburden removal (Figure 13.1) using hydraulic excavators to load a fleet of haul trucks:
|
| o |
Overburden at Oron is harder and typically requires blasting (Figure 13.2). Overburden removal is undertaken by contractor and loaded to haul trucks and used to
backfill areas of previous workings as progressive restoration. Waste mining rates at Oron are typically 6 to 7 Mm3 per annum.
|
| o |
Blasting of overburden is not always required at Rotem and free digging can be undertaken. Again, overburden is used for progressive restoration. Waste mining rates
for Rotem are typically 14 to 15 Mm3 per annum.
|
| o |
Working areas are up to 80,000 m2 in surface area and several working areas are active at any one time.
|
| • |
Once overburden removal is complete, phosphate mining is undertaken sequentially in mining blocks as a series of strips. Bulldozers are used to work the phosphate by
ripping 0.5 m high cuts (Figure 13.3). The ore is pushed into piles for loading by front end loaders into trucks. Typically, two bulldozers work simultaneously in one area. After the phosphate has been piled and loaded, the
interburden is removed in the same manner.
|



| 13.1 |
Geotechnics and Hydrogeology
|
| 13.2 |
Mining Strategy
|


| 13.3 |
Production
|
|
Table 13.1: Total ICL Rotem Mine Production (2020 – 2024)
|
||
|
Year
|
Total Mine Production
of Phosphate Ore (kt)
|
Grade P2O5 (%)
(Before / After Beneficiation)
|
|
2020
|
6,263
|
26 / 32
|
|
2021
|
4,893
|
26 / 32
|
|
2022
|
4,488
|
26 / 32
|
|
2023
|
5,770
|
25 / 32
|
|
2024
|
5,808
|
23 / 31
|
|
2020 includes production from Zin prior to cessation of operations
|
||
| 13.4 |
Life of Mine Schedule
|
| • |
White (<0.25% organic matter)
|
| • |
Low Organic (0.25 to 0.35% organic matter),
|
| • |
Brown and High Organic (>0.35% to 1.0% organic matter)
|
| • |
Bituminous (>1.0% organic matter).
|
| • |
White phosphate rock from Oron is mined and processed at the Oron beneficiation plant and the phosphate concentrate transported to the Rotem plant for further
processing into higher added value products such as white phosphoric acids for food applications.
|
| • |
Low organic phosphate rock from Rotem is processed at the Rotem plant to produce green (impure) phosphoric acids for agricultural applications.
|
| • |
Bituminous phosphate rock from the centre of the Rotem deposit is mined and used to produce fertilizers at the Rotem plant. Further significant bituminous phosphate
exists within the deeper parts of the Rotem deposit, however, only limited mining of this has occurred to date due to the presence of thick overburden (10 to 50 meters) containing horizons of oil shale. The oil shale contains 12
- 21 % organic matter and is susceptible to self-combustion when exposed by mining.
|
| • |
The Oron beneficiation plant will be reconfigured to allow brown and low organic phosphate rock to be mined and processed at Oron and the phosphate concentrate
transported to the Rotem plant for use in the production of green phosphoric acid. In addition, brown phosphate rock from Oron will be transported by truck to the Rotem beneficiation plant and used to produce additional green
phosphoric acid and fertilizers after 2029.
|
| • |
The Rotem beneficiation plant will process bituminous phosphate rock mined from Rotem, and the concentrate used in the production of white phosphoric acid. Overburden
containing horizons of oil shale will be stripped to allow access to the underlying bituminous rock. An upper limit of around 20 % of the total overburden will be allowed to contain oil shale and this will be transported to
designated waste dumps and capped using marl rock.
|
| • |
Bituminous phosphate rock from Rotem will also continue to be used to produce fertilizers.
|
| • |
Mining of the available bituminous rock at Rotem to produce white phosphoric acid is planned to be completed by the end of 2029 and the remainder of white phosphate
at Oron will be used for speciality fertilizers.
|
| • |
Small scale mining at Zin of approximately 0.2 Mtpa of low organic phosphate rock is planned to continue for the life of mine (LOM) using in-pit crushing and
screening and final processing at the Oron beneficiation plant.
|

| 1. |
Ore tonnes are Proven Mineral Reserves as presented in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 2. |
Mining losses and mining dilution applied as detailed in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 3. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| • |
Rotem site: The life of mine at Rotem runs from 2025 to 2029 (inclusive) based on 1.3 Mt of reserves of low organic phosphate that will be mined in 2025 and 13.0 Mt
of reserves of bituminous phosphate for production of fertilizers and white phosphoric acid, with an annual average mining rate of 2.6 Mt in the years 2025 – 2029. Reserves of bituminous phosphate are only reported for areas in
which the total overburden required to be mined contains a maximum of around 20 % oil shale. Significant resources (62.6 Mt) of bituminous phosphate are present beneath an overburden containing higher amounts of oil shale and
ICL Rotem plans further technical studies to assess the potential for mining and stockpiling this overburden.
|
| • |
Oron site: The life of mine at Oron runs from 2025 to 2040 (inclusive) based on 3.0 Mt of reserves of white phosphate rock, with an annual average mining rate of 0.2
Mt for the years 2025 – 2040, as well as 60.3 Mt of reserves of brown and low organic phosphate , of which 0.6 Mt will be mined in 2025 and 30 Mt in the years 2026-2040 at an annual average mining rate of 2 Mt. In the years
2030-2040, 29.7 Mt of brown phosphate rock will be transported to Rotem beneficiation plant for processing to produce additional green phosphoric acid and fertilizers at an annual average mining rate of 2.7 Mt.
|
| • |
Zin site: The life of mine at Zin runs from 2025 to 2040 (inclusive) based on reserves of 3.2 Mt of low organic phosphate for small-scale product sales (using minor
mining equipment located inside the open pit without utilizing the Zin beneficiation plant). Additional resources (11.8 Mt) of low organic phosphate are available at Zin should these be required by ICL Rotem in the future.
|
| 13.5 |
Mining Equipment
|
|
Table 13.2: ICL Rotem Summary of Mining Equipment
|
|||||
|
Machine
|
Manufacturer
|
Main Parameter
|
|||
|
Owned
|
Dump
truck
|
1
|
630E
|
HAULPAK DRESSER
|
130 t
|
|
6
|
EH3500ACII
|
HITACHI
|
162 t
|
||
|
Loader
|
2
|
L1100
|
LeTourneau
|
Bucket capacity
16.8m3
|
|
|
ANFO MIXER
|
2
|
DAF8*4
|
TREAD
|
17.4m^2
|
|
|
AMERIND
|
19.6m^2
|
||||
|
Tire Handler
|
2
|
ZW310-7
|
HITACHI + OTR tire handler
|
-
|
|
|
Cat966
|
|||||
|
Service Truck
|
2
|
DAF8*4
|
18t
|
||
|
Inter
|
10t
|
||||
|
Leased
|
Maniscope
|
1
|
Jcb telehandler
|
15.5m
|
4t
|
|
Leased
|
Excavators
|
1
|
9350
|
Liebherr
|
Backhoe 18.7m^2
|
| 13.6 |
Mining Personnel
|
|
Table 13.3: ICL Rotem Mining Personnel
|
|
|
Department
|
Number
|
|
Operations
|
46
|
|
Maintenance & Drilling and Blasting
|
5
|
|
Geology
|
2
|
|
Planning
|
1
|
|
Rock Mechanics
|
22
|
|
Operational Excellence, Innovation & Process Engineering
|
1
|
|
Health & Safety
|
1
|
|
Total
|
78
|
| 14 |
| • |
Phosphoric acid for agricultural applications (green phosphoric acid).
|
| • |
Technical phosphoric acid for food applications (white phosphoric acid).
|
| • |
Phosphate fertilizers (GTSP, GSSP).
|
| • |
Special fertilizers (MKP, MAP, Hipeck, PicAcid) and composite fertilizers.
|

| 14.1 |
Oron Beneficiation Plant
|

| 14.2 |
Rotem Beneficiation Plant
|


| 14.3 |
Zin Beneficiation Plant
|
| 14.4 |
Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Facilities
|
|
Table 14.1: Rotem Fertilizer and Acid Plants
|
|
|
Plant Number
|
Facilities
|
|
Plant 10
|
Sulfuric Acid
|
|
Plant 11
|
Sulfuric Acid
|
|
Plants 20 and 70
|
Beneficiation Plant
|
|
Plant 30
|
Green Acid Plant
|
|
Plant 31
|
Green Acid Plant
|
|
Plant 32
|
Green Acid Plant
|
|
Plant 40
|
Fertilizer Plant
|
|
Plant 42
|
Fertilizer Plant
|
|
Plant 50
|
Fertilizer Plant
|
|
White Acid 1
|
White Acid Plant
|
|
White Acid 2
|
White Acid Plant
|
|
White Acid 3
|
White Acid Plant
|
|
White Acid 4
|
White Acid Plant
|
|
White Acid 5
|
White Acid Plant
|
|
MKP
|
Special Fertilizers
|
|
MAP
|
Special Fertilizers
|
| 14.4.1 |
Sulphuric Acid Plants
|

| 14.4.2 |
Phosphoric Acid Plants
|

| 14.4.3 |
The Four D Plant
|
| 14.4.4 |
White Phosphoric Acid Plant
|

| 14.5 |
Fertilizer Plants
|

| 14.5.1 |
Mono Ammonium Phosphate
|

| 14.5.2 |
Mono Kalium Phosphate
|
| 14.6 |
Processing Personnel
|
|
Table 14.2: ICL Rotem Processing Personnel
|
|
|
Facility
|
Number of Personnel
|
|
Fertilizer plant
|
75
|
|
Quality Assurance
|
3
|
|
Engineering
|
8
|
|
Beneficiation lab
|
9
|
|
Raw material
|
6
|
|
R&D
|
21
|
|
MKP plant
|
45
|
|
Analytical lab
|
27
|
|
Oron beneficiation plant
|
43
|
|
Rotem beneficiation plant
|
39
|
|
Sulfuric acid plant
|
37
|
|
Phosphoric acid plant
|
79
|
|
White Phosphoric acid plant
|
61
|
|
Energy plant
|
21
|
|
Rotem transportation
|
36
|
|
Asdod transportation
|
16
|
|
Offices and Householder
|
101
|
|
Personal contract / Managers
|
130
|
|
Total
|
757
|
| 15 |
| 15.1 |
Surface Layout
|


| 15.2 |
Roads
|
| 15.3 |
Rail
|
| 15.4 |
Ports
|
| 15.5 |
Power
|
| 15.6 |
Water
|
| • |
Potable water which can be used for drinking; and
|
| • |
A saline brackish water also supplied via the national water grid.
|
| 15.7 |
Tailings Storage Facilities
|

| 16 |
| 16.1 |
Phosphate Market
|
| 16.2 |
Demand
|
| • |
More than 95 % of phosphate rock mined in the United States is used to manufacture phosphoric acid, which is used as intermediate feedstocks in the manufacture of
fertilizers and animal feed supplements. About 25 % of the wet-process phosphoric acid produced is exported in the form of upgraded granular diammonium phosphate (DAP), monoammonium phosphate (MAP) fertilizer, merchant-grade
phosphoric acid, and other phosphate fertilizer products.
|
| • |
Higher phosphoric acid prices will push India to rely more heavily on DAP imports and domestic production using imported phosphate rock and sulphur to build its DAP
stocks.
|
| • |
The total demand for phosphate rock in China is predicted to reach approximately 2.2 - 2.7 billion tons between now and 2050. This demand can be met by domestic
supply. China is now supplying phosphorus rock to more than 50 % of the global market.
|
| 16.3 |
Commodity Price Projections
|
| 16.4 |
Contracts
|
| 16.4.1 |
Acid and Fertilizer Sales Contracts
|
| 16.4.2 |
Other Contracts
|
| 17 |
| 17.1 |
Permitting
|
|
Table 17.1: Permits and Licences held by ICL Rotem
|
||
|
Plant
|
Licence/Permit
|
Expiration Date
|
|
ICL Rotem (Arad)
|
Air emission permit (including stack emissions)
|
January 28, 2031
|
|
General business licence
|
Renewed and valid until December 12, 2028
|
|
|
Hazardous materials permit
|
Valid until January 30, 2030
|
|
|
ICL Zafir (Oron – Zin)
|
General business licence
|
Zin - Valid until December 31, 2028
Oron – Valid until December 31, 2044
|
|
Hazardous materials permit
|
Valid until January 30, 2030
|
|
| 17.2 |
ICL Rotem Environmental Organisational Structure
|

| 17.3 |
Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) Procedures
|
| 17.3.1 |
HSE Procedures
|
|
• Travel within the mine areas
|
• Site preservation
|
|
• Permit to enter the mine
|
• Ground shocks, noise, and dust
|
|
• Accident / Near Accident Reporting
|
• Contractors' work in the mines
|
|
• Using a cell phone
|
• Road planning in the mine
|
|
• Mediation training for a new contractor
employee
|
• Workspace operation
|
|
• definition of mine works
|
• Switching operators between shifts
|
|
• Definition of environmental risks in mines
• Rehabilitation while mining
|
• Introduction of an IDF operator into a new
work area
|
| 17.3.2 |
HSE Management
|

| 17.3.3 |
Environmental Procedures
|
|
• Poison permit and treatment of hazardous
substances
|
• Training and awareness
|
|
• Business licence
|
• Monitoring and measurement
|
|
• Work in open areas
|
• Reporting and documenting environmental
events and exceptions
|
|
• Adherence to conditions in permits -
business licences and their renewal
|
• Air quality detectors on the Property
boundaries
|
|
• Dealing with Home Front Command regarding
hazardous substances and submitting reports
|
• Prevention of soil contamination by
chemicals, fuel and oils
|
|
• Requirements under any law and other
requirements
|
• Treatment of hazardous materials and waste
disposal
|
|
• Goals, objectives, and environmental
management plan
|
• Prevention of harm to flocks of migratory
birds
|
|
• Communication with the environmental
regulator (and submitting reports)
|
• Prevention of soil and groundwater
pollution from evaporation and storage ponds
|
|
• Operational control
|
• Disposal of electrical and electronic
equipment, batteries, and accumulators
|
|
• Inconsistencies and corrective and
preventive actions
|
• Pipe marking
|
|
• Engineering, safety and environmental rules
for fuel storage facilities and internal gas stations in the company
|
| 17.3.4 |
Environmental Management
|
| 17.4 |
Stakeholder Engagement
|
| 17.5 |
Mine and Facility Closure Plans
|
| • |
ICL Rotem, a representative from the Ministry of Energy and Infrastructures and the Parks Authority meets each month. The active programmes are reviewed and areas
for improvement are discussed.
|
| • |
ICL Rotem is working with Be’er Sheva University and the Parks Authority to review the long-term impact of reclamation after 5 years’ and identify any areas for
improvement.
|
| • |
Active reclamation of areas where mining has finished includes backfilling with overburden, topsoil replaced, and the area returned to its pre-mining state.
|
| • |
Reclamation costs are managed by the mines, where for each tonne of phosphate removed finance is set aside for reclamation. This financial provision differs from
other quarries in Israel where money is paid to an Authority that reclaims the area once quarrying has finished.
|
| 17.6 |
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
| 18 |
| 18.1 |
Capital Costs
|
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for ICL Rotem
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
812.0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
723.0
|
|
Other
|
$M
|
512.3
|
|
Total Capital Costs
|
$M
|
2,047.3
|
| 18.2 |
Operating Costs
|
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for ICL Rotem
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
671.2
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
9,136.2
|
|
G&A
|
$M
|
729.3
|
|
D&A
|
$M
|
-1,692.2
|
|
Total Operating Costs
|
$M
|
8,844.5
|
| 19 |
| 19.1 |
Economic Criteria
|
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for ICL Rotem
|
|||||||
|
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
|||||
|
Mining
|
|||||||
|
Mine Life
|
Years
|
16
|
|||||
|
Total Ore Tonnes Mined
|
Mt
|
80.8
|
|||||
|
Waste Volume
|
Mm3
|
242.9
|
|||||
|
Strip Ratio (Waste (m3) to Ore (t))
|
Ratio
|
3.0
|
|||||
|
Processing
|
|||||||
|
Total Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
80.8
|
|||||
|
Grade P2O5
|
%
|
24.9
|
|||||
|
Processing Rate
|
Mtpa
|
5.0
|
|||||
|
Beneficiation Plant Recovery
|
%
|
Rotem
|
Oron
|
Zin
|
|||
|
2025
2026 - 2029
2030 – 2040
|
54%
69%
60%
|
2025
2026 - 2040
|
59%
60%
|
2025 - 2040
|
50%
|
||
|
Economic Factors
|
|||||||
|
Discount Rate
|
%
|
10
|
|||||
|
Exchange Rate
|
NIS to $
|
3.58
|
|||||
|
Commodity Price
|
|||||||
|
Acid products
|
$/t FOB
|
1,178
|
|||||
|
Fertilizer products
|
$/t FOB
|
424
|
|||||
|
Zin phosphate rock
|
$/t FOB
|
114
|
|||||
|
Taxes
|
%
|
23
|
|||||
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
202.0
|
|||||
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
-
|
|||||
|
Revenues
|
$M
|
12,609.3
|
|||||
|
Capital Costs (including closure)
|
$M
|
2,103.1
|
|||||
|
Operating Costs
|
$M
|
8,844.5
|
|||||
| 19.2 |
Cash Flow Analysis
|
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for ICL Rotem
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Description
|
Unit
|
LOM Total
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
2030
|
2031
|
2032
|
2033
|
2034
|
2035
|
2036
|
2037
|
2038
|
2039
|
2040
|
2041
|
|
Mining
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore
|
Mt
|
80.8
|
5.0
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
0
|
|
Waste
|
Mm3
|
242.9
|
24.4
|
18.4
|
18.4
|
18.4
|
18.4
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
13.2
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore Feed to Plants
|
Mt
|
80.8
|
5.0
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
0
|
|
Grade P2O5
|
%
|
24.9
|
25.3
|
27.1
|
27.1
|
27.1
|
27.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
24.1
|
0
|
|
Contained P2O5
|
Mt
|
20.14
|
1.27
|
1.41
|
1.41
|
1.41
|
1.41
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
1.20
|
0
|
|
Recovered P2O5
|
Mt
|
13.44
|
0.78
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0.79
|
0
|
|
Acid Products
|
Mt
|
4.37
|
0.24
|
0.31
|
0.31
|
0.31
|
0.31
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0.26
|
0
|
|
Fertilizer Products
|
Mt
|
17.16
|
0.85
|
1.12
|
1.12
|
1.12
|
1.12
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
1.08
|
0
|
|
Zin Phosphate Rock
|
Mt
|
1.6
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0
|
|
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Acid Products
|
$M
|
5,152.7
|
366.3
|
480.7
|
480.7
|
480.7
|
480.7
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
260.3
|
0
|
|
Fertilizer Products
|
$M
|
7,274.2
|
357.7
|
469.5
|
469.5
|
469.5
|
469.5
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
458.0
|
0
|
|
Zin Phosphate Rock
|
$M
|
182.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
11.4
|
0
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
12,609.3
|
735.4
|
961.7
|
961.7
|
961.7
|
961.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
729.7
|
0
|
|
Operating Costs
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
671.2
|
35.8
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
42.4
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
9,136.2
|
676.3
|
699.5
|
699.5
|
699.5
|
699.5
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
514.7
|
0
|
|
G&A
|
$M
|
729.3
|
48.8
|
48.8
|
48.8
|
48.8
|
48.8
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
0
|
|
D&A
|
$M
|
-1,692.2
|
-109.6
|
-109.6
|
-109.6
|
-109.6
|
-109.6
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
-104.0
|
0
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
8,844.5
|
651.2
|
680.9
|
680.9
|
680.9
|
680.9
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
497.2
|
0
|
|
Capital Costs
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
812.0
|
59.5
|
68.5
|
66.0
|
66.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
723.0
|
68.5
|
30.0
|
51.5
|
53.8
|
57.3
|
44.7
|
43.7
|
43.7
|
42.7
|
42.7
|
41.7
|
41.7
|
40.7
|
40.7
|
39.7
|
39.7
|
0
|
|
Other
|
$M
|
512.3
|
44.3
|
60.8
|
34.3
|
31.0
|
26.0
|
26.0
|
27.0
|
27.0
|
28.0
|
28.0
|
29.0
|
29.0
|
30.0
|
30.0
|
31.0
|
31.0
|
0
|
|
Closure
|
$M
|
55.7
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
55.7
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
2,103.1
|
172.3
|
159.3
|
151.8
|
150.8
|
129.3
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
116.7
|
55.7
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
202.0
|
12.5
|
13.0
|
13.0
|
13.0
|
13.0
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
0
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Pre-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
1,459.8
|
-100.5
|
108.4
|
116.0
|
117.0
|
138.5
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
103.3
|
-55.7
|
|
Tax (23%)
|
$M
|
371.7
|
0.0
|
24.9
|
26.7
|
26.9
|
31.9
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
23.8
|
0.0
|
|
After-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
1,088.1
|
-100.5
|
83.5
|
89.3
|
90.1
|
106.6
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
79.5
|
-55.7
|
|
Project Economics
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
After Tax NPV (10%)
|
$M
|
530.4
|
-100.5
|
75.9
|
73.8
|
67.7
|
72.8
|
49.4
|
44.9
|
40.8
|
37.1
|
33.7
|
30.7
|
27.9
|
25.3
|
23.0
|
20.9
|
19.0
|
-12.1
|
| 19.3 |
Sensitivity Analysis
|
| • |
Commodity price
|
| • |
Exchange rate
|
| • |
Operating costs
|
| • |
Capital costs
|
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for ICL Rotem
|
||||
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Commodity Price ($/t FOB)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
||
|
-20%
|
Acids $942/t
|
Fertilizers $339/t
|
Zin Rock $91/t
|
-681.8
|
|
-10%
|
Acids $1,060/t
|
Fertilizers $382/t
|
Zin Rock $103/t
|
-27.2
|
|
0%
|
Acids $1,178/t
|
Fertilizers $424/t
|
Zin Rock $114/t
|
503.4
|
|
10%
|
Acids $1,296/t
|
Fertilizers $466/t
|
Zin Rock $125/t
|
1,087.9
|
|
20%
|
Acids $1,414/t
|
Fertilizers $509/t
|
Zin Rock $137/t
|
1,634.7
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Exchange Rate (NIS/$)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
||
|
-20%
|
2.86
|
-681.8
|
||
|
-10%
|
3.22
|
-27.2
|
||
|
0%
|
3.58
|
503.4
|
||
|
10%
|
3.94
|
1,087.9
|
||
|
20%
|
4.30
|
1,634.7
|
||
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Operating Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
||
|
-20%
|
7,075.6
|
1,325.9
|
||
|
-10%
|
7,960.0
|
931.5
|
||
|
0%
|
8,844.5
|
503.4
|
||
|
10%
|
9,728.9
|
129.2
|
||
|
20%
|
10,613.4
|
-284.9
|
||
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Capital Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
||
|
-20%
|
1,682.5
|
719.7
|
||
|
-10%
|
1,892.8
|
625.0
|
||
|
0%
|
2,103.1
|
503.4
|
||
|
10%
|
2,313.4
|
435.7
|
||
|
20%
|
2,523.7
|
341.1
|
||

| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 22.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Mineral Resources for the Property have been prepared to industry best practice and conform to the resource categories defined by the SEC in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
The exploration drillhole database contains the following:
|
| o |
Oron – 1,931 drillholes for 36,822 m and 4,508 composite samples.
|
| o |
Rotem – 1,503 drillholes for 68,347 m and 2,791 composite samples.
|
| o |
Zin – 2,126 drillholes for 43,924 m and 5,449 composite samples.
|
| • |
The drilling, logging, and sampling follows a conventional approach suitable for the geology and deposit type. The results achieved are in line with expectations
and, in the QP’s opinion, there are no drilling, sampling, or recovery factors that could materially impact the accuracy and reliability of results.
|
| • |
Drilling is undertaken on a spacing of 200 – 250 m and then infilled on 50 – 70 m spacing where necessary. Mineral Resource classification by ICL Rotem considers
Measured Mineral Resources to be generally within a 250 m drillhole spacing, however, some areas can be assigned Measured Mineral Resources where the drillhole spacing is greater than this due to high confidence in the
geological and structural interpretation of these areas.
|
| • |
Given the high density of drilling at the Rotem, Oron and Zin deposits, the Mineral Resources are classified as Measured. The QP considers this appropriate given
the laterally extensive and stratiform nature of the deposits and the low level of grade variability. The local geology is relatively simple with gentle dips and few significant faults, those that do occur have displacements
of less than a few metres affecting the phosphate bearing seams.
|
| • |
There is significant exploration potential for further phosphate deposits in the surrounding area including the Barir Field, located to the northwest of Rotem.
Currently no concession exists for this area.
|
| 22.2 |
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
| • |
Mineral Reserves for the Property have been classified in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Reserves in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
Measured Mineral Resources were converted to Mineral Reserves through the application of modifying factors. There are no Indicated or Inferred Mineral Resources
at Rotem, Oron or Zin.
|
| • |
The ICL Rotem mines use conventional open pit mining methods including drilling and blasting (where required) and then utilising a range of diesel hydraulic
excavators and haul trucks. Phosphate is mined by ripping using bulldozers which allows for a selectivity of 0.5 m thickness for mining the phosphate seams.
|
| • |
Mining at Rotem is a combination of contractor and owner operated while mining at Oron and Zin is entirely by contractor.
|
| • |
The current life of mine is 16 years, based on an average mining rate of 5 Mtpa over the total life of mine and a strip ratio of 3.0 (waste (m3) to ore
(t)).
|
| 22.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
After successful R&D efforts including pilot plant testwork, 250 kt of brown phosphate and 180 kt of bituminous phosphate ores were processed successfully to
produce green and white phosphoric acids, through Plants 30 and 31, respectively.
|
| • |
The QP is of the opinion that the data derived from the testing is conventional and adequate for the purposes of Mineral Resource estimation given the style of
deposit. Pilot trials have been undertaken on significant tonnages of material and the results of which have been used to develop and optimize the flow sheet for processing brown phosphate ore from Oron and bituminous
phosphate ore from Rotem.
|
| • |
Based on this testwork metallurgical recoveries of 69 % were calculated for beneficiation of bituminous phosphate rock at Rotem and 60 % for beneficiation of
brown phosphate rock.
|
| 22.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
The current infrastructure is sufficient to support the planned changes to production and no significant upgrades or changes are required.
|
| 22.5 |
Environment
|
| • |
ICL Rotem has all the current required permits to conduct work on the Property and the Company believes that all required permits to continue production will be
achieved. It is the QP’s opinion that ICL Rotem’s current actions and plans are appropriate to address any issues related to environmental compliance, permitting, relationship with local individuals or groups.
|
| • |
There are currently no known environmental, permitting, or social/community risks that could impact the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves.
|
| • |
Progressive restoration of areas where mining has been completed is undertaken by ICL Rotem with positive results.
|
| 23 |
| 23.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Implement and monitor a robust QA/QC system which incorporates standards, duplicates and blank samples to document sampling and laboratory performance.
Establish further geological standard samples of varying grades and send to external laboratories for comparison.
|
| • |
The QP recommends that a 3D block modelling approach should be considered by ICL Rotem for future Mineral Resource estimates. This would aid visualisation and
communication of the resource model and integration with mine planning, scheduling and regular reconciliations with production data.
|
| 23.2 |
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
| • |
Undertake regular reconciliations of mining production data against the geological model.
|
| • |
Undertake regular reviews of dilution and mining recovery.
|
| 23.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
Continue R&D programmes to identify a metallurgical process route to produce white phosphoric acid from brown phosphate rock.
|
| • |
Continue R&D programmes to investigate potential reprocessing of tailings material, which contains on average approximately 17 % P2O5.
|
| • |
Continue R&D programmes to develop saleable products from the gypsum tailings.
|
| 23.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Continue active engagement with local communities and stakeholders through formal and informal projects and outreach.
|
| • |
Continue to meet monthly with representatives from the Ministry of Energy and Infrastructures and the Parks Authority to review the active programmes, address
any issues and look for areas for improvements.
|
| • |
Continue to work closely with Be’er Sheva University and the Parks Authority to review the status and benefits of ongoing restoration programmes and identify
any areas for improvement.
|
| • |
Data and information pertaining to current plans to address environmental compliance and local individuals or groups should become more transparent and ICL
Rotem should consider the requirement to disclose this information more clearly and separately from the overall corporate responsibility report and information disclosed on the ICL corporate website.
|
| • |
Whilst Rotem is in a constant state of progressive development and reclamation of depleted open pits, it is recommended that a Mine and Facility Closure Plan is
developed in order to align with accepted international best practice.
|
| 24 |
REFERENCES
|
| 25 |
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report,
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report, and
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources.
|
| 26 |
|
Qualified Person or Firm
|
Signature
|
Date
|
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
“signed”
|
February 27, 2025
|

|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE DEAD SEA WORKS MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL
February 27, 2025
|
|
Wardell Armstrong (part of SLR)
Baldhu House, Wheal Jane Earth Science Park, Baldhu, Truro, Cornwall, TR3 6EH,
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)1872 560738 www.wardell-armstrong.com
|
|
|
EFFECTIVE DATE:
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
DATE ISSUED:
|
February 27, 2025
|
|
JOB NUMBER:
|
ZT61-2273
|
|
VERSION:
REPORT NUMBER:
STATUS:
|
V4.0
MM1810
Final
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE DEAD SEA WORKS MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL
|
|
|
Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong International Ltd,
Registered in England No. 3813172. Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom
UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Bolton, Bristol, Bury St Edmunds, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh,
Glasgow, Leeds, London, Newcastle upon Tyne and Truro. International Office: Almaty.
|
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
LAND AND PROPERTY
MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING
MINERAL ESTATES
WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE
DEAD SEA WORKS MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL
|
|
|
CONTENTS
|
||
|
1
|
||
|
1.1
|
Property Description
|
1
|
|
|
1.2
|
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
2
|
|
|
1.3
|
History
|
3 | |
|
1.4
|
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
3 | |
|
1.5
|
Exploration
|
4 | |
|
1.6
|
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
4 | |
|
1.7
|
Data Verification
|
5 | |
|
1.8
|
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
5 | |
|
1.9
|
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
5 | |
|
1.10
|
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
6 | |
|
1.11
|
Mining Methods
|
7
|
|
|
1.12
|
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
8
|
|
|
1.13
|
Infrastructure
|
9
|
|
|
1.14
|
Market Studies
|
9
|
|
|
1.15
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
9
|
|
|
1.16
|
Capital, Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
9
|
|
|
1.17
|
Adjacent Properties
|
10
|
|
|
1.18
|
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
10
|
|
|
1.19
|
Recommendations
|
10
|
|
12
|
|
2.1
|
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
12
|
|
|
2.2
|
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
13 | |
|
2.3
|
Sources of Information
|
13 | |
|
2.4
|
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
14
|
|
|
2.5
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
14
|
|
|
2.6
|
Units and Abbreviations
|
15 |
| 18 |
|
3.1
|
Tenure
|
19 | |
|
3.2
|
Royalties
|
21 | |
|
3.3
|
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
21 |
| 22 |
|
4.1
|
Accessibility
|
22 | |
|
4.2
|
Climate
|
22 | |
|
4.3
|
Local Resources
|
22 | |
|
4.4
|
Infrastructure
|
22 | |
|
4.5
|
Physiography
|
23 |
| 24 |
|
5.1
|
Ownership History
|
24 | |
|
5.2
|
Exploration History
|
25 | |
|
5.3
|
Production History
|
26 |
| 27 |
|
6.1
|
Regional Geology
|
27 | |
|
6.2
|
Local and Property Geology
|
29 | |
|
6.3
|
Mineralisation
|
32
|
|
|
6.4
|
Deposit Type
|
32 |
| 33 |
|
7.1
|
Solution Chemistry
|
33 | |
|
7.2
|
Thickness of Carnallite
|
34 | |
|
7.3
|
QP Opinion
|
34 |
| 36 |
|
8.1
|
Sampling Preparation
|
36 | |
|
8.2
|
Analysis
|
36 | |
|
8.3
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
38 | |
|
8.4
|
Sample Security
|
38 | |
|
8.5
|
QP Opinion
|
38 |
|
39
|
|
9.1
|
Site Visits
|
39 | |
|
9.2
|
Database
|
39 | |
|
9.3
|
QP Opinion
|
39 |
| 40 |
| 41 |
|
11.1
|
Summary
|
41 | |
|
11.2
|
Mineral Resource Estimation Methodology
|
41 | |
|
11.3
|
Assessment of Future Variation in Brine Inflows and Chemistry
|
43 | |
|
11.4
|
Mineral Resource Classification
|
43 | |
|
11.5
|
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
44 | |
|
11.6
|
Mineral Resource Statement
|
44 | |
|
11.7
|
Risk Factors That May Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
44 |
| 45 |
|
12.1
|
Summary
|
45 | |
|
12.2
|
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
46
|
|
|
12.3
|
Dilution and Mining Recovery
|
46 | |
|
12.4
|
Cut-off Grade and Recovery
|
46 | |
|
12.5
|
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
46 | |
|
12.6
|
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
46 |
| 47 |
|
13.1
|
Pumping
|
49 | |
|
13.2
|
Salt Harvesting
|
50
|
|
|
13.3
|
Carnallite Harvesting
|
52 | |
|
13.4
|
Geotechnics and Hydrogeology
|
53 | |
|
13.5
|
Life of Mine Schedule
|
53 | |
|
13.6
|
Mining Equipment
|
54
|
|
|
13.7
|
Personnel Requirement
|
54 |
| 55 |
|
14.1
|
Carnallite Processing Plant
|
55 | |
|
14.2
|
Personnel Requirement
|
56 |
| 57 |
|
15.1
|
Roads
|
58 | |
|
15.2
|
Rail
|
58 | |
|
15.3
|
Ports
|
58 | |
|
15.4
|
Power and Water
|
59
|
|
|
15.5
|
Tailings and Waste Dumps
|
59 |
| 60 |
|
16.1
|
Potash Market
|
60 | |
|
16.2
|
Demand
|
60 | |
|
16.3
|
Commodity Price Projections
|
61 | |
|
16.4
|
Contracts
|
61 |
| 62 |
|
17.1
|
Permitting
|
62 | |
|
17.2
|
ICL Dead Sea Environmental Organisational Structure
|
63 | |
|
17.3
|
Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) Procedures
|
63 | |
|
17.4
|
Stakeholder Engagement
|
65 | |
|
17.5
|
Mine and Facility Closure Plans
|
65 | |
|
17.6
|
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
65 |
| 66 |
|
18.1
|
Capital Costs
|
66 | |
|
18.2
|
Operating Costs
|
66 |
| 67 |
|
19.1
|
Economic Criteria
|
67 | |
|
19.2
|
Cash Flow Analysis
|
68 | |
|
19.3
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
69 |
| 71 |
| 72 |
| 73 |
|
22.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
73 | |
|
22.2
|
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
73 | |
|
22.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
74 | |
|
22.4
|
Infrastructure
|
74 | |
|
22.5
|
Environment
|
74 |
| 75 |
|
23.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
75 | |
|
23.2
|
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
75 | |
|
23.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
75 | |
|
23.4
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
75 |
| 76 |
| 77 |
| 78 |
|
TABLES
|
|
|
Table 1.1: Summary of Potash Production at the DSW
|
3
|
|
Table 1.2: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Dead Sea Works – December 31, 2024
|
6
|
|
Table 1.3: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Dead Sea Works – December 31, 2024
|
6
|
|
Table 5.1: Summary of Potash Production at the DSW
|
26 |
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Dead Sea Works – December 31, 2024
|
41 |
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Dead Sea Works – December 31, 2024
|
45 |
|
Table 12.2: DSW Precipitation and Harvesting Production Data for 2020 - 2024
|
46 |
|
Table 13.1: Summary of Pumping Performance (2009 to 2024)
|
50 |
|
Table 13.2: DSW Life of Mine Schedule
|
54 |
|
Table 14.1: Personnel for the Carnallite Processing Plant
|
56 |
|
Table 17.1: Permits and Licences held by ICL Dead Sea
|
61 |
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for the Dead Sea Works
|
66 |
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for the Dead Sea Works
|
66 |
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for the Dead Sea Works
|
67 |
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for the Dead Sea Works
|
68 |
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for the DSW
|
69 |
|
FIGURES
|
|
|
Figure 3.1: Location of the DSW, Israel
|
18 |
|
Figure 3.2: ICL Dead Sea Concession Area
|
21 |
|
Figure 6.1: Location of the Ded Sea Basin within the Dead Sea Transform Fault System
|
27 |
|
Figure 6.2: Geological Model of the Formation of the Dead Sea
|
28 |
|
Figure 6.3: Local Geology of the Dead Sea Region
|
29 |
|
Figure 6.4: Schematic Cross Section of the Western Dead Sea
|
30 |
|
Figure 6.5: Stratigraphy of the Dead Sea Group at Mount Sodom
|
31 |
|
Figure 7.1: Mineral Concentration in Solution with Progression through the DSW Pond System
|
33 |
|
Figure 7.2: Brine Sample Collecting
|
34 |
|
Figure 7.3: Methodology and Equipment used in Surveying Carnallite Precipitation
|
35 |
|
Figure 7.4: Plan of Carnallite Ponds Showing Solution Depth in Metres
|
35 |
|
Figure 7.5: Plan of Carnallite Ponds Showing Carnallite Thickness in Metres
|
35 |
|
Figure 8.1: Analysis of Brine Samples for KCl (g/kg) by Sampling Station (2024)
|
37 |
|
Figure 8.2: Analysis of Brine Samples for NaCl (g/kg) by Sampling Station (2024)
|
37 |
|
Figure 8.3: Analysis of Brine Samples for MgCl2 (g/kg) by Sampling Station (2024)
|
38 |
|
Figure 8.4: Analysis of Brine Samples for Ca (g/kg) by Sampling Station (2024)
|
38 |
|
Figure 11.1: ICL Predictive Model of Dead Sea Estimated Recovered KCl Against Water Inflow
|
42 |
|
Figure 11.2: ICL Predictive Models of Dead Sea Level Reduction Against Water Inflow
|
43 |
|
Figure 13.1: Outline of the Salt and Carnallite Ponds at the DSW
|
48 |
|
Figure 13.2: Schematic Plan of DSW Solution Flows (schematic) and Pumping Stations
|
49 |
|
Figure 13.3: P9 Pumping Station
|
49 |
|
Figure 13.4: Salt Harvesting Cutter Suction Dredger
|
51
|
|
Figure 13.5: Schematic of Deposition of Carnallite (PL - Pond Level, H – Height Measured, CH – Carnallite Cake Height, NFL – NaCl floor
level)
|
52 |
|
Figure 13.6: Schematic Production Scheme (Barge Cycle)
|
53 |
|
Figure 13.7: DSW Mining Personnel Requirement
|
54 |
|
Figure 14.1: Potash Compaction Process at the DSW
|
56 |
|
Figure 15.1: General Site Map of the DSW Processing Facilities
|
57
|
|
Figure 15.2: DSW Combined Cycle Power Plant Configuration
|
59 |
|
Figure 17.1: DSW Environmental Management Department
|
63 |
|
Figure 19.1: After-Tax 10% NPV Sensitivity Analysis
|
70 |
|
Figure 20.1: Relationship Between the DSW in Israel and APC in Jordan
|
71 |
| 1 |
| 1.1 |
Property Description
|
| 1.2 |
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
| 1.3 |
History
|
|
Table 1.1: Summary of Potash Production at the DSW
|
|||
|
Year
|
Potash Product (kt)
|
Year
|
Potash Product (kt)
|
|
2005
|
3,720
|
2015
|
2,437
|
|
2006
|
3,691
|
2016
|
3,768
|
|
2007
|
3,641
|
2017
|
3,654
|
|
2008
|
3,543
|
2018
|
3,804
|
|
2009
|
3,185
|
2019
|
3,334
|
|
2010
|
3,402
|
2020
|
3,960
|
|
2011
|
2,982
|
2021
|
3,900
|
|
2012
|
3,529
|
2022
|
4,011
|
|
2013
|
3,590
|
2023
|
3,819
|
|
2014
|
3,503
|
2024
|
3,700
|
| 1.4 |
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
| 1.5 |
Exploration
|
| 1.6 |
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
| 1.7 |
Data Verification
|
| 1.8 |
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
| 1.9 |
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
|
Table 1.2: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Dead Sea Works – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
|
Measured
|
297.9
|
20.8
|
|
Indicated
|
1,642.4
|
21.2
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
1,940.3
|
21.1
|
|
Inferred
|
463.0
|
21.2
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Dead Sea and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
Mineral Resources are reported as being contained within the carnallite ponds following pumping from the northern Dead Sea basin.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 5. |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Dead Sea.
|
| 6. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 0% KCl.
|
| 8. |
The Dead Sea Works is a dredging operation, and therefore no minimum mining width has been applied.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities of 1.67 t/m3 for carnallite and 2.16 t/m3 for salt.
|
| 10. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 80.4%.
|
| 11. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash price of $320/t FOB and an exchange rate of NIS 3.58 per U.S dollar.
|
| 1.10 |
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
|
Table 1.3: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Dead Sea Works – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
|
Proven
|
122.7
|
20.6
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
122.7
|
20.6
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Dead Sea and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Dead Sea.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
The Mineral Reserve estimate has an effective date of December 31, 2024.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a cut-off grade of 0% KCl.
|
| 8. |
The Dead Sea Works is a dredging operation, and therefore no minimum mining width has been applied.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 80.4%.
|
| 10. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average of the previous two years’ potash price of $296/t FOB and an exchange rate of NIS 3.58 per U.S dollar.
|
| 1.11 |
Mining Methods
|
| 1.12 |
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
| 1.13 |
Infrastructure
|
| 1.14 |
Market Studies
|
| 1.15 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
| 1.16 |
Capital, Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
| 1.17 |
Adjacent Properties
|
| 1.18 |
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
| 1.19 |
Recommendations
|
| 1.19.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
A quality control sample is included at the start and end of each batch of brine samples analysed by the DSW laboratory. The control sample is used to monitor the accuracy of the
laboratory analysis and has target values of 10 g/kg for KCl, 127 g/kg for MgCl2, 35 g/kg for CaCl2 and 45 g/kg for NaCl. The QP considers it would be prudent to run additional controls of lower and higher KCl grade, as well as ‘blank’ samples, to provide an additional check on the laboratory analysis.
|
| 1.19.2 |
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
| • |
Continue to progress existing projects including:
|
| o |
The conveyor to transfer salt back to the Northen basin (currently undergoing detailed engineering design) for commissioning planned in 2027. Costs for this project are included in
the capital and operating costs.
|
| o |
The second dredger for the Salt Harvesting Project (commissioning planned in 2027). Costs for this project are included in the capital and operating costs.
|
| o |
Following detailed design completed in 2022, continue design optimisation works for the Arava stream project to prevent erosion endangering the future stability of the eastern dykes
in the array of salt and carnallite ponds.
|
| 1.19.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
The DSW processing plant has operated in a steady state for many years. As such no further recommendations are made by the QP other than to continue with ongoing optimisation
studies.
|
| 1.19.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Consider more closely the requirement to disclose information more clearly and separately from the overall corporate responsibility report and information disclosed on the ICL
corporate website.
|
| • |
Consider implementing a formalised system of stakeholder engagement as a standard procedure.
|
| 2 |
| 2.1 |
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
| 2.2 |
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
| • |
The P-9 pumping station at the southern end of the northern Dead Sea basin and the settling pond from the P-9 pumping station.
|
| • |
Pond 5 (salt pond) including levee between sub ponds 156/1 and 156/2.
|
| • |
Salt harvesting dredger and salt stockpiles in Pond 5.
|
| • |
Planned conveyor route for the return of salt to the Northern basin.
|
| • |
The carnallite ponds.
|
| • |
A review of brine sampling methods and procedures.
|
| • |
The analytical laboratory and observed analysis of brine samples.
|
| • |
Pump station 36 to the Arava stream for return of brine to the Northern basin.
|
| • |
The Tzefa transfer station including conveyor from the DSW, product storage facilities and rail load out.
|
| 2.3 |
Sources of Information
|
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report.
|
| • |
Documentation for licensing and permitting, published government reports and public information as included in Section 24 (References) of this report and cited in this report.
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report.
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources as listed below.
|
| • |
Mr. Meir Berger, CFO Potash Division
|
| • |
Mr. Oriel Aliat, Director of Mega Projects.
|
| • | Mr. Evgeny Maiburd, Head of Process Engineering. |
| • |
Mr. Lior Steiner, Head of the Salt Harvest Department.
|
| • |
Mr. Zvi Yonatan – Salt Conveyance Project Manager.
|
| • |
Mr. Alex Aizenberg – Project Manager, Chief Civil Engineer.
|
| • |
Mr. Eli Gafnovich – Tzefa Site Manager.
|
| 2.4 |
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
| 2.5 |
Forward-Looking Statements
|
| 2.6 |
Units and Abbreviations
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
°C
|
Degrees Celsius
|
|
2D
|
Two-dimensional
|
|
3D
|
Three-dimensional
|
|
AA
|
Atomic Absorption
|
|
AAS
|
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
|
|
AGI
|
American Geologic Institute
|
|
AI
|
Acid Insoluble assays
|
|
Al2O3
|
Aluminium Oxide
|
|
APC
|
Arab Potash Company
|
|
BAT
|
Best Available Technology or Best Available Techniques
|
|
bhp
|
Brake Horse Power
|
|
BOT
|
Build-Operate-Transfer
|
|
Ca2+
|
Calcium ions
|
|
CaCl2
|
Calcium chloride
|
|
CaO
|
Calcium Oxide
|
|
Cd
|
Cadmium
|
|
CDP
|
Carbon Disclosure Project
|
|
CEMS
|
Constant Emissions Monitoring Systems
|
|
CO2
|
Carbon dioxide
|
|
COG
|
Cut-off Grade
|
|
CORS
|
Continuously Operating Reference Station
|
|
CRM
|
Certified Reference Materials
|
|
CSD
|
Cutter Suction Dredge
|
|
DST
|
Dead Sea Transform (geological fault system)
|
|
DSPGC
|
Dead Sea Preservation Government Company Limited
|
|
DSW
|
Dead Sea Works
|
|
EA
|
Environmental Assessment
|
|
EDA
|
Exploratory data analysis
|
|
EHS&S
|
Environment, Health, Safety and Sustainability
|
|
EIA
|
Environmental Impact Assessment
|
|
EIS
|
Environmental Impact Statement
|
|
EMS
|
Environmental Management System
|
|
EPR
|
Environmental Permitting Regulations
|
|
ESG
|
Economic and environmental, Social, Governance
|
|
ESIA
|
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
|
|
F
|
Florine
|
|
Fe
|
Iron
|
|
Fe2O3
|
Iron Oxide or ferric oxide
|
|
FOB
|
Free on Board / Freight on Board
|
|
FS
|
Feasibility Study
|
|
GHG
|
Greenhouse Gas
|
|
GIS
|
Geographical Information Services
|
|
GPS
|
Global Positioning System
|
|
GRI
|
Global Reporting Initiative
|
|
GWh
|
Gigawatt hour
|
|
H&S
|
Health and Safety
|
|
Ha
|
Hectare (10,000m2)
|
|
HFO
|
Heavy Fuel Oil
|
|
HOP
|
Human and Organizational Performance
|
|
hr
|
Hour/s
|
|
HSSD
|
Holland Shallow Seas Dredging
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
ICL
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
ID
|
Identification (number or reference)
|
|
IEC
|
Israeli National Grid
|
|
ILA
|
Israel Lands Administration
|
|
IPPC
|
Integrated Pollution Prevention Control
|
|
JV
|
Joint Venture
|
|
K
|
Potassium
|
|
K2O
|
Potassium oxide
|
|
KCl
|
Potash
|
|
KCl.MgCl2•6(H2O)
|
Carnallite
|
|
kV
|
Kilovolt
|
|
kW
|
Kilowatt
|
|
kWh
|
Kilowatt hour
|
|
kWh/t
|
Kilowatt hour per tonne
|
|
LFO
|
Light Fuel Oil
|
|
LIMS
|
Laboratory Information Management System
|
|
LOM
|
Life of Mine
|
|
LTA
|
Lost Time Analysis
|
|
M
|
Million(s)
|
|
Ma
|
Million years
|
|
MAPGIS
|
GIS Mapping Software
|
|
mbsl
|
Metres below sea level
|
|
MgCl2
|
Magnesium chloride
|
|
MgO
|
Magnesium Oxide
|
|
MOP
|
Muriate of potash
|
|
Mtpa
|
Million tonnes per annum
|
|
MW
|
Megawatt
|
|
MWh
|
Megawatt hour
|
|
NaCl
|
Sodium Chloride (salt)
|
|
NEGEV
|
Negev Energy Ashalim Thermo-Solar Ltd. (Israeli Natural Gas Grid Supplier)
|
|
OEE
|
Overall Equipment Effectiveness
|
|
P2O5
|
Phosphorus pentoxide
|
|
Pa
|
Pascal (measurement of vacuum gas pressure)
|
|
PFS
|
Prefeasibility Study
|
|
ppm
|
parts per million
|
|
QA/QC
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
|
QMS
|
Quality Management System
|
|
QP
|
Qualified Person
|
|
RMR
|
Rock Mass Rating
|
|
ROM
|
Run of Mine
|
|
rpm
|
revolutions per minute
|
|
SEC
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
SiO2
|
Silicon Dioxide
|
|
SLR
|
SLR Consulting Limited
|
|
SRM
|
Standard Reference Materials
|
|
t
|
Tonne metric unit of mass (1,000kg or 2,204.6 lb)
|
|
t/a or tpa
|
Tonnes per annum
|
|
t/d or tpd
|
Tonnes per day
|
|
t/h or tph
|
Tonnes per hour
|
|
TRS
|
(SK 1300) Technical Report Summary
|
|
UTM
|
Universal Transverse Mercator
|
|
WAI
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
|
XRD
|
X-ray powder Diffraction
|
|
XRF
|
X-ray powder Fluorescence
|
| 3 |

| 3.1 |
Tenure
|

| 3.2 |
Royalties
|
| 3.3 |
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
| 4 |
| 4.1 |
Accessibility
|
| 4.2 |
Climate
|
| 4.3 |
Local Resources
|
| 4.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
Pump stations.
|
| • |
Southern basin ponds:
|
| o |
Salt Ponds.
|
| o |
Carnallite Ponds.
|
| • |
Salt harvesting cutter suction dredger.
|
| • |
Salt stockpile on eastern side of Pond 5.
|
| • |
Carnallite harvesting cutter suction dredgers.
|
| • |
Arava Stream which flows along the international border of Israel and Jordan and used for return of brine to the northern basin from the final carnallite ponds.
|
| • |
Processing facilities including potash production facilities (cold leach plant, hot leach plant and compaction plant), bromine and chlorine plants, metal magnesium, magnesium
chloride and salt production facilities.
|
| • |
Product storage.
|
| • |
Road haulage facilities and load outs.
|
| • |
18 km conveyor to Tzefa.
|
| • |
Railhead at Tzefa (Mishor Rotem) and load out facilities.
|
| • |
New power station which supplies electricity and steam to the DSW operation and sells surplus electricity to other ICL companies and external customers via the national electricity
grid. The power station has a capacity of 230 MWh and uses natural gas which is piped into the facility from the national gas grid.
|
| • |
Old power station which is operated on a limited basis as a hot back up.
|
| • |
Process and potable water sources – supplied by national water network.
|
| • |
Research and development (R&D) facility.
|
| • |
Warehouse.
|
| • |
Workshop.
|
| • |
Mine offices and change houses.
|
| • |
Administration offices.
|
| • |
Cafeterias.
|
| • |
Medical services facilities.
|
| • |
Analytical laboratory.
|
| • |
Port facilities and storage at Ashdod and Eilat (including rail load out at Ashdod).
|
| 4.5 |
Physiography
|
| 5 |
| 5.1 |
Ownership History
|
| 5.2 |
Exploration History
|
| 5.3 |
Production History
|
|
Table 5.1: Summary of Potash Production at the DSW
|
|||
|
Year
|
Potash Product (kt)
|
Year
|
Potash Product (kt)
|
|
2005
|
3,720
|
2015
|
2,437
|
|
2006
|
3,691
|
2016
|
3,768
|
|
2007
|
3,641
|
2017
|
3,654
|
|
2008
|
3,543
|
2018
|
3,804
|
|
2009
|
3,185
|
2019
|
3,334
|
|
2010
|
3,402
|
2020
|
3,960
|
|
2011
|
2,982
|
2021
|
3,900
|
|
2012
|
3,529
|
2022
|
4,011
|
|
2013
|
3,590
|
2023
|
3,819
|
|
2014
|
3,503
|
2024
|
3,700
|
| 6 |
| 6.1 |
Regional Geology
|


| 6.2 |
Local and Property Geology
|

| • |
Clastic Hazeva Formation (Early to Late Miocene): fill the bottom of the Dead Sea basin and consist of sandstones and conglomerates of fluviatile and lacustrine origin.
|
| • |
Evaporitic Sedom Formation (Late Miocene to Pliocene): predominantly lagoonal origin halite.
|
| • |
Postevaporitic series (Pliocene to Recent): largely coarse to fine clastics of fluviafile and lacustrine origin, and some lacustrine carbonates and evaporites.
|


| 6.3 |
Mineralisation
|
| 6.4 |
Deposit Type
|
| 7 |
| 7.1 |
Solution Chemistry
|


| 7.2 |
Thickness of Carnallite
|
| 7.3 |
QP Opinion
|

![]() Figure 7.4: Plan of Carnallite Ponds Showing
Solution Depth in Metres
|
![]() Figure 7.5: Plan of Carnallite Ponds Showing
Carnallite Thickness in Metres
|
| 8 |
| 8.1 |
Sampling Preparation
|
| • |
Complete dissolution by adding distilled water.
|
| • |
A 2-litre glass container is placed on a scales, and approximately 4/5 of the sample volume is transferred to the glass container.
|
| • |
100 ml of distilled water is added to the bottom of the bottle which contains the solids
|
| • |
A magnet is added to the original sample bottle and is transferred to the stirring station.
|
| • |
The bottle is stirred for five minutes to ensure dissolution.
|
| • |
The remaining solution from the glass container is added to the original bottle, and the total sample weight is recorded.
|
| • |
The diluted solution from the 2-litre glass container is then transferred back to the original bottle.
|
| • |
A 500 ml glass bottle is placed on the scales, and the scales are zeroed.
|
| • |
A 50 ml sample is transferred from the original bottle to the 500 ml glass container, and the sample weight is recorded.
|
| • |
The sample is diluted with distilled water up to the 500 ml mark and mixed thoroughly by stirring for 3 - 5 minutes.
|
| • |
After filtering the sample is transferred into a 10 ml test tube in preparation for chemical analysis.
|
| 8.2 |
Analysis
|




| 8.3 |
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
| 8.4 |
Sample Security
|
| 8.5 |
QP Opinion
|
| 9 |
| 9.1 |
Site Visits
|
| • |
Pump stations, salt ponds and carnallite ponds.
|
| • |
Extent of brine sampling to date.
|
| • |
Review of brine sampling methods, sample preparation and analysis procedures.
|
| • |
Sample storage areas.
|
| • |
Analytical laboratory.
|
| • |
Data storage procedures.
|
| • |
Review of sample databases.
|
| 9.2 |
Database
|
| • |
Review of geological and geographical setting of the Dead Sea;
|
| • |
Review of extent of the sampling to date;
|
| • |
Review of sampling and analysis procedures;
|
| • |
An evaluation of minimum and maximum grade values;
|
| • |
Assessing for inconsistencies in spelling or coding (typographic or case sensitive errors);
|
| • |
Ensuring full data entry for each sample;
|
| • |
A review of assay detection limits;
|
| • |
Identification of problematic assay records;
|
| • |
A review for consistency of assay results for each sampling location.
|
| 9.3 |
QP Opinion
|
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 11.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Dead Sea Works – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
|
Measured
|
297.9
|
20.8
|
|
Indicated
|
1,642.4
|
21.2
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
1,940.3
|
21.1
|
|
Inferred
|
463.0
|
21.2
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Dead Sea and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
Mineral Resources are reported as being contained within the carnallite ponds following pumping from the northern Dead Sea basin.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 5. |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Dead Sea.
|
| 6. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 0% KCl.
|
| 8. |
The Dead Sea Works is a dredging operation, and therefore no minimum mining width has been applied.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities of 1.67 t/m3 for carnallite and 2.16 t/m3 for salt.
|
| 10. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 80.4%.
|
| 11. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash price of $320/t FOB and an exchange rate of NIS 3.58 per U.S dollar.
|
| 11.2 |
Mineral Resource Estimation Methodology
|
| • |
Determination of pumping rate of brines from northern Dead Sea area to ponds.
|
| • |
Determination of expected recovery of product as based upon:
|
| o |
Ability to determine composition and consistency of supply.
|
| o |
Ability to predict consistency of evaporation and mineral precipitation.
|
| • |
Determination of Mineral Resource classification is based upon:
|
| o |
Any variation in supply rate and composition.
|
| o |
Any variation in return flow of brines to Dead Sea to assess efficiency and consistency of process.
|
| o |
Variation in precipitation of mineral amounts.
|
| • |
Assessment of potential changes to any of the above factors.
|
| 11.3 |
Assessment of Future Variation in Brine Inflows and Chemistry
|
![]() Figure 11.1: ICL Predictive Model of Dead Sea Estimated Recovered KCl Against Water Inflow
|
![]() |
| 11.4 |
Mineral Resource Classification
|
| • |
Measured Mineral Resources have been classified for the period 2025 to 2043. During this period, the modelled KCl production rates and ranges of water inflows show a high level of
consistency. For the period 2025 to 2031 the Measured Mineral Resources were based on the previous 5 years actual production data.
|
| • |
Indicated Mineral Resources have been classified for the period 2043 to 2111. During this period the predictive models were considered to show wider potential variation from the base
case predictions than those considered for Measured Mineral Resources.
|
| • |
Inferred Mineral Resources have been classified for the period 2111 to 2133. During this period the predictive models show wider variation than those considered for Measured or
Indicated Mineral Resources.
|
| 11.5 |
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
| 11.6 |
Mineral Resource Statement
|
| 11.7 |
Risk Factors That May Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
| 12 |
| 12.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Dead Sea Works – December 31, 2024
|
||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
|
Proven
|
122.7
|
20.6
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
122.7
|
20.6
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Dead Sea and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant.
|
| 4. |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Dead Sea.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
The Mineral Reserve estimate has an effective date of December 31, 2024.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a cut-off grade of 0% KCl.
|
| 8. |
The Dead Sea Works is a dredging operation, and therefore no minimum mining width has been applied.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a metallurgical recovery of 80.4%.
|
| 10. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average of the previous two years’ potash price of $296/t FOB and an exchange rate of NIS 3.58 per U.S dollar.
|
| 12.2 |
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
|
Table 12.2: DSW Precipitation and Harvesting Production Data for 2020 - 2024
|
||||||
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
Five Year Average
|
|
|
Halite Precipitation in Carnallite Ponds by Mass Balance (kt)
|
2,551
|
3,262
|
2,473
|
2,558
|
3,064
|
2,781
|
|
Carnallite and Halite Precipitation in Carnallite Ponds by Mass Balance (kt)
|
20,626
|
25,012
|
22,011
|
20,405
|
24,672
|
22,545
|
|
Carnallite Precipitation in Carnallite Ponds by Mass Balance (kt)
|
18,075
|
21,750
|
19,538
|
17,847
|
21,608
|
19,764
|
|
KCl (%) in Precipitation by Mass Balance
|
23.5%
|
23.3%
|
23.8%
|
23.5%
|
23.5%
|
23.5%
|
|
% Halite in Precipitation
|
12.4%
|
13.0%
|
11.2%
|
12.5%
|
12.4%
|
12.3%
|
|
% Carnallite in Precipitation
|
87.6%
|
87.0%
|
88.8%
|
87.5%
|
87.6%
|
87.7%
|
|
Harvested Material (kt)
|
23,662
|
23,614
|
24,069
|
22,867
|
22,629
|
23,368
|
|
KCl (%) in Harvested Material
|
20.6%
|
20.3%
|
21.1%
|
20.5%
|
20.6%
|
20.6%
|
| 12.3 |
Dilution and Mining Recovery
|
| 12.4 |
Cut-off Grade and Recovery
|
|
12.5
|
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
| 12.6 |
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
| 13 |

| 13.1 |
Pumping
|


|
Table 13.1: Summary of Pumping Performance (2009 to 2024)
|
||||
|
Year
|
Pump Station and Volume Pumped (Mm3)
|
|||
|
P88 and P9*
|
P5
|
P11
|
P33
|
|
|
2009
|
406.3
|
401.3
|
223.3
|
230.5
|
|
2010
|
409.4
|
404.4
|
223.8
|
230.0
|
|
2011
|
447.9
|
442.9
|
224.7
|
229.8
|
|
2012
|
459.8
|
454.8
|
231.1
|
241.5
|
|
2013
|
406.7
|
401.7
|
248.9
|
262.8
|
|
2014
|
377.2
|
372.2
|
214.3
|
222.2
|
|
2015
|
375.1
|
370.1
|
240.0
|
225.4
|
|
2016
|
417.6
|
412.6
|
268.7
|
274.2
|
|
2017
|
422.0
|
417.0
|
241.3
|
249.7
|
|
2018
|
431.6
|
421.6
|
226.4
|
244.4
|
|
2019
|
436.5
|
426.5
|
239.5
|
258.5
|
|
2020
|
454.7
|
444.7
|
226.1
|
239.0
|
|
2021
|
443.5
|
437.5
|
255.3
|
268.1
|
|
2022
|
473.2
|
467.2
|
245.3
|
256.9
|
|
2023
|
453.8
|
447.8
|
229.1
|
241.7
|
|
2024
|
468.9
|
462.9
|
261.3
|
278.0
|
| 13.2 |
Salt Harvesting
|

| • |
2025 - 2027: 5.5 – 7 Mm3 (7 – 9 Mt of salt) per year
|
| • |
2027 - 2030: 11 – 14 Mm3 (14 – 18 Mt of salt) per year
|
| • |
2030 - 2037: 14 – 16 Mm3 (18 – 21 Mt of salt) per year
|
| 13.3 |
Carnallite Harvesting
|


| 13.4 |
Geotechnics and Hydrogeology
|
| 13.5 |
Life of Mine Schedule
|
|
Table 13.2: DSW Life of Mine Schedule
|
|||||||
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
Q1 2030
|
Total
|
|
|
Waste (Mt)
(Salt Harvesting)
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
10.0
|
16.0
|
16.0
|
4.0
|
62.0
|
|
Proven Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
5.8
|
122.7
|
|
KCl (%)
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
|
Probable Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
KCl (%)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
5.8
|
122.7
|
|
KCl (%)
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
| 1. |
Ore tonnes are Proven Mineral Reserves as presented in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 2. |
Mining recovery of 100 % and Mining dilution of 0 % applied as detailed in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 3. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 13.6 |
Mining Equipment
|
| • |
Pump stations: P9 (pumping from northern Dead Sea basin), P5, P44, P11 and P33.
|
| • |
A cutter suction dredger for the Salt Harvesting Project and 9 excavators (contractor owned and operated) for managing the stockpiled salt in Pond 5.
|
| • |
Seven cutter suction dredgers for carnallite harvesting.
|
| 13.7 |
Personnel Requirement
|

| 14 |
| 14.1 |
Carnallite Processing Plant
|
| 14.1.1 |
Cold Leach Plant
|
| 14.1.2 |
Hot Leach Plant
|
| 14.1.3 |
Compaction Plant
|

| 14.2 |
Personnel Requirement
|
|
Table 14.1: Personnel for the Carnallite Processing Plant
|
|
|
Department
|
Number
|
|
Hot Leach Plant
|
88
|
|
Cold Leach Plant
|
64
|
|
Granulation Plant
|
47
|
| 15 |

| 15.1 |
Roads
|
| 15.2 |
Rail
|
| 15.3 |
Ports
|
| 15.4 |
Power and Water
|

| 15.5 |
Tailings and Waste Dumps
|
| 16 |
| 16.1 |
Potash Market
|
| 16.2 |
Demand
|
| • |
Brazil is one of the largest consumers of potash globally with 95 % of potash imported from Canada, Russia, Germany and Israel, making up 25 % of the global imported potash. However,
the Autazes Potash Project is expected to supply a significant portion of Brazil’s annual potash demand for the next three decades once it comes online around 2029.
|
| • |
In 2023, China made up 21 % of the global imported potash. In 2024, China initiated a MOP import contract with a Russian supplier to reboot the dormant market which is likely to
influence buyers’ bids in other key regions such as south-east Asia and Brazil. A Chinese MOP producer has also started construction on a new potash plant in Laos which is expected to be producing 1 Mt/yr by the end of 2026 with exports in
early 2027, making it the third in the country. In June 2024, China introduced additional restrictions on fertilizer exports to stabilise domestic prices and safeguard food security but have interrupted global fertiliser supplies, prompting
countries such as India and South Korea to seek alternatives in a market already impacted by geopolitical tensions and disrupted shipping routes.
|
| • |
The US is one of the top producers of potash globally but still imports additional resources to meet their needs. The potential introduction of import tariffs for all imports from
Canada will have a significant impact on potash, as suppliers will either lower their prices to mitigate this or keep them the same but risk losing their US market, meaning the US may have to source potash from other regions and affecting the
overall global market as US demands for potash increase.
|
| 16.3 |
Commodity Price Projections
|
| 16.4 |
Contracts
|
| 16.4.1 |
Potash Sales Contracts
|
| 16.4.2 |
Other Contracts
|
| 17 |
| 17.1 |
Permitting
|
|
Table 17.1: Permits and Licences held by ICL Dead Sea
|
|
|
Licence/Permit
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Air emission permit 1528
|
01/01/2030
|
|
Air emission permit 1233
|
01/01/2030
|
|
Haz. Mat. permit
|
01/01/2030
|
|
Wastewater discharge permit
|
31/12/2029
|
|
Water production license
|
31/12/2025
*The water authority renews the permit every year in June. New permit expected June 2025.
|
| 17.2 |
ICL Dead Sea Environmental Organisational Structure
|

| 17.3 |
Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) Procedures
|
| 17.3.1 |
HSE Procedures
|
|
• Natural gas emergency state
|
• Shelters
|
• Communication in emergency scenarios
|
|
• Odorizing facility
|
• Weather situations preparedness
|
• Emergency behaviour
|
|
• Lock out tag out
|
• Emergency equipment checks
|
• Earthquakes preparedness
|
|
• Risk assessment
|
• Emergency HQ operations
|
• H&S procedure
|
|
• Assistance to outside persons in case of emergency
|
• Incidents reports
|
• Incidents investigations
|
|
• Violators of safety provisions
|
• Certified person working near rotating equipment
|
• Industrial hygiene procedure
|
|
• Referent employees
|
• Working near flammable materials
|
• Industrial hygiene monitoring
|
|
• Safety division activity in non-regular working hours
|
• Safety in laboratories
|
• Harmful dust
|
|
• Communication procedure
|
• Safety working with angle grinder
|
• Transportation safety
|
|
• Safety referent
|
• Safety working with open flame tools
|
• Forklift safety
|
|
• Risk management
|
• Safety in portable electrical equipment
|
• Trucks safety
|
|
• Pressure vessels
|
• Safety using high pressure equipment
|
• Connecting\Disconnecting of fire systems
|
|
• Construction
|
• Piping marking
|
• Fire-fighting - reporting of events
|
|
• Safety permit
|
• Electrical permit
|
• Closed breathing systems
|
|
• Lifting apparatus and machines
|
• Working in heights
|
• Fire truck
|
|
• Confined space entry
|
• Gas measurement
|
• Pregnant employee works
|
|
• Safety training
|
• Safety signs
|
• Ambulance operation
|
|
• Flammable gases cylinders
|
• Safety programme
|
• Clinic operations
|
|
• Personal protective equipment
|
• Valve opening\closing
|
• Hazardous materials
|
|
• Radiation
|
• Lifting of people using a forklift
|
• Natural gas safety procedure
|
|
• Safety committee
|
| 17.3.2 |
Environmental Procedures
|
|
• Air quality assurance
|
• Transport and storage of chemicals
|
|
• Reports to environmental authorities
|
• Mining sites (wadi material): Responsibility and authority
|
|
• Risks and opportunities
|
• Data Analysis
|
|
• Complaint handling
|
• Operation of environmental air monitoring stations
|
|
• Customer satisfaction
|
• Annual environmental training programme
|
|
• Measurements and monitoring
|
• Internal audit report
|
|
• Managing toxic permit
|
• Mining sites (wadi material): Responsibility and authority
|
|
• Organizational structure, roles, and authorities
|
• Operation of environmental protection trustees
|
|
• Environmental internal communication
|
• A list of environmental law requirements
|
|
• Confidentiality of information and conflict of interest
|
• Treatment of pollutant emissions from chimneys
|
|
• Acceptance and delivery of hazardous materials
|
• Work order level of service
|
|
• Hazardous Materials Transportation
|
• Actions to be taken- high conductivity in the sewage system
|
|
• Preparation, maintenance, and operation of a toxin permit
|
• Operation of the Membrane Facility (wastewater treatment)
|
|
• Environmental Aspects Identification and Scaling
|
• Responsibility for management and communication in the organization
|
|
• Sewage Disposal from the canals
|
• Reporting and documenting environmental events and exceptions
|
|
• Prevention of fuel and oil wastewater pollution
|
• Procedure for handling and disposal of waste
|
|
• Procurement, storage, and handling of chemicals
|
| 17.4 |
Stakeholder Engagement
|
| 17.5 |
Mine and Facility Closure Plans
|
| 17.6 |
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
| 18 |
| 18.1 |
Capital Costs
|
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for the Dead Sea Works
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
766.1
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
219.1
|
|
Other
|
$M
|
325.9
|
|
Total Capital Costs
|
$M
|
1,311.1
|
| 18.2 |
Operating Costs
|
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for the Dead Sea Works
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
563.1
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
4,198.7
|
|
G&A
|
$M
|
236.4
|
|
Depreciation
|
$M
|
-1,184.4
|
|
Total Operating Costs
|
$M
|
3,813.7
|
| 19 |
| 19.1 |
Economic Criteria
|
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for the Dead Sea Works
|
||
|
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
|
Mining
|
||
|
Mine Life
|
Years
|
5.25
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes Mined
|
Mt
|
122.7
|
|
Waste Tonnes (Salt Harvesting)
|
Mt
|
62.0
|
|
Mining Rate (Ore and Waste)
|
Mtpa
|
35.2
|
|
Processing
|
||
|
Total Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
122.7
|
|
Grade KCl
|
%
|
20.6
|
|
Processing Rate
|
Mtpa
|
23.4
|
|
Plant Recovery
|
%
|
80.4
|
|
Economic Factors
|
||
|
Discount Rate
|
%
|
10
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
NIS to $
|
3.58
|
|
Commodity Price
|
$/t FOB
|
296
|
|
Taxes
|
%
|
23
|
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
255.3
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
-
|
|
Revenues
|
$M
|
6,014.4
|
|
Capital Costs
|
$M
|
1,311.1
|
|
Operating Costs
|
$M
|
3,813.7
|
| 19.2 |
Cash Flow Analysis
|
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for the Dead Sea Works
|
||||||||
|
Description
|
Unit
|
LOM Total
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
2030
|
|
Mining
|
||||||||
|
Ore
|
Mt
|
122.7
|
23.368
|
23.368
|
23.368
|
23.368
|
23.368
|
5.842
|
|
Waste
|
Mt
|
62.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
10.0
|
16.0
|
16.0
|
4.0
|
|
Processing
|
||||||||
|
Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
122.7
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
23.4
|
5.8
|
|
Grade KCl
|
%
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
20.6
|
|
Contained KCl
|
Mt
|
25.3
|
4.81
|
4.81
|
4.81
|
4.81
|
4.81
|
1.20
|
|
Recovered KCl
|
Mt
|
20.3
|
3.87
|
3.87
|
3.87
|
3.87
|
3.87
|
0.97
|
|
Revenue
|
||||||||
|
Potash
|
$M
|
6,014.4
|
1,145.6
|
1,145.6
|
1,145.6
|
1,145.6
|
1,145.6
|
286.4
|
|
Operating Costs
|
||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
563.1
|
104.4
|
104.9
|
106.0
|
110.1
|
110.1
|
27.5
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
4,198.7
|
778.5
|
782.1
|
790.2
|
821.3
|
821.3
|
205.3
|
|
G&A
|
$M
|
236.4
|
48.3
|
44.2
|
44.3
|
44.2
|
44.2
|
11.1
|
|
Depreciation
|
$M
|
-1,184.4
|
-189.1
|
-206.7
|
-211.9
|
-256.3
|
-256.3
|
-64.1
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
3,813.7
|
742.1
|
724.5
|
728.6
|
719.3
|
719.3
|
179.8
|
|
Capital Costs
|
||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
766.1
|
145.9
|
145.9
|
145.9
|
145.9
|
145.9
|
36.5
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
219.1
|
41.7
|
41.7
|
41.7
|
41.7
|
41.7
|
10.4
|
|
Other
|
$M
|
325.9
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
15.5
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
1,311.1
|
249.7
|
249.7
|
249.7
|
249.7
|
249.7
|
62.4
|
|
Cash Flow
|
||||||||
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
255.3
|
40.8
|
41.2
|
53.0
|
53.5
|
53.5
|
13.4
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Pre-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
634.4
|
113.0
|
130.2
|
114.3
|
123.1
|
123.1
|
30.8
|
|
Tax (23%)
|
$M
|
145.9
|
26.0
|
29.9
|
26.3
|
28.3
|
28.3
|
7.1
|
|
After-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
488.5
|
87.0
|
100.2
|
88.0
|
94.8
|
94.8
|
23.7
|
|
Project Economics
|
||||||||
|
After Tax NPV (10%)
|
$M
|
401.5
|
87.0
|
91.1
|
72.7
|
71.2
|
64.7
|
14.7
|
| 19.3 |
Sensitivity Analysis
|
| • |
Commodity price
|
| • |
Head grade
|
| • |
Metallurgical recovery
|
| • |
Exchange rate
|
| • |
Operating costs
|
| • |
Capital costs
|
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for the DSW
|
||
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Commodity Price ($/t FOB)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
237
|
-469.5
|
|
-10%
|
266
|
19.6
|
|
0%
|
296
|
401.5
|
|
10%
|
326
|
783.1
|
|
20%
|
366
|
1164.5
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Head Grade (% KCl)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
-
|
-
|
|
-10%
|
18.5
|
19.6
|
|
0%
|
20.6
|
401.5
|
|
10%
|
22.7
|
783.1
|
|
20%
|
-
|
-
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Recovery (%)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
-
|
-
|
|
-10%
|
70.4
|
-94.8
|
|
0%
|
80.4
|
401.5
|
|
10%
|
90.4
|
876.1
|
|
20%
|
-
|
-
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Exchange Rate (NIS:$)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
2.86
|
-469.5
|
|
-10%
|
3.22
|
19.6
|
|
0%
|
3.58
|
401.5
|
|
10%
|
3.94
|
783.1
|
|
20%
|
4.30
|
1164.6
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Operating Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
3,050.8
|
886.1
|
|
-10%
|
3,432.4
|
643.8
|
|
0%
|
3,813.7
|
401.5
|
|
10%
|
4,195.0
|
159.3
|
|
20%
|
4,576.5
|
-107.8
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Capital Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 10% ($M)
|
|
-20%
|
1,048.9
|
567.9
|
|
-10%
|
1,179.9
|
484.7
|
|
0%
|
1,311.1
|
401.5
|
|
10%
|
1,442.2
|
318.4
|
|
20%
|
1,573.2
|
235.2
|
| 20 |

| 21 |
| 22 |
| 22.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Mineral Resources for the Property have been prepared to industry best practice and conform to the resource categories defined by the SEC in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
The source brines from the northern Dead Sea basin and their changes in chemistry as they flow through the series of evaporation ponds is well understood and is sufficiently sampled.
|
| • |
Approximately 2,080 samples of the brines are analysed at the DSW laboratory each year and produce approximately 8,320 results per year. Analysis is undertaken for KCl, MgCl2, CaCl2 and NaCl.
|
| • |
The sample preparation, analyses, QA/QC procedures, and sample security are considered appropriate for the deposit type. Data verification identified no significant issues with the
databases used for Mineral Resource estimation.
|
| • |
The Mineral Resource estimation process used by ICL Dead Sea involves long-term predictive modelling of brine inflow rates and changes to brine chemical composition.
|
| • |
Mineral Resources are classified based on the predictive models using the following criteria:
|
| o |
Measured Mineral Resources have been classified for the period 2025 to 2043. During this period, the modelled KCl production rates and ranges of water inflows show a high level of
consistency. For the period 2025 to 2031 the Measured Mineral Resources were based on the previous 5 years actual production data.
|
| o |
Indicated Mineral Resources have been classified for the period 2043 to 2111. During this period the predictive models were considered to show wider potential variation from the base
case predictions than those considered for Measured Mineral Resources.
|
| o |
Inferred Mineral Resources have been classified for the period 2111 to 2133. During this period the predictive models show wider variation than those considered for Measured or
Indicated Mineral Resources.
|
| • |
Future exploration involves ongoing monitoring of the chemical composition of the brines.
|
| 22.2 |
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
| • |
Mineral Reserves for the Property have been classified in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Reserves in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
Measured Mineral Resources within the timeframe of the current concession (up to March 31, 2030) were converted to Proven Mineral Reserves. No Indicated Mineral Resources were
converted to Mineral Reserves because sufficient Measured Resources are available in the concession timeframe. Inferred Mineral Resources were not converted to Mineral Reserves.
|
| • |
Mining is undertaken using cutter suction dredgers to harvest the carnallite from the floor of the ponds before being pumped to the processing plant. The mining method is
conventional and has operated for many years.
|
| • |
The current LOM runs from 2025 to March 31, 2030.
|
| 22.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
The DSW carnallite processing plant has operated in steady state for many years. In 2024, a total of 3.7 Mt of potash were produced.
|
| • |
No significant changes are planned to the processing plant.
|
| • |
Final potash products produced by the DSW operation include Standard Grade (SMOP), Granular Grade (GMOP) and Fine Grade (FMOP).
|
| • |
Metallurgical recovery of KCl is approximately 80.4 % based on the previous five-year’s average. However, KCl that is not recovered is returned to the ponds and can be re-harvested
in future.
|
| 22.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
ICL Dead Sea intends to construct a 24 km conveyor to transfer salt back to the northern basin (currently undergoing detailed engineering design) for commissioning planned in 2027.
|
| • |
ICL intends for a second dredger for the Salt Harvesting Project for commissioning planned in 2027.
|
| 22.5 |
Environment
|
| • |
Permits held by ICL Dead Sea for the Property are sufficient to ensure that mining activities are conducted within the regulatory framework required by regulations.
|
| • |
There are currently no known environmental, permitting, or social/community risks that could impact the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves.
|
| 23 |
| 23.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
A control sample is included at the start and end of each batch of brine samples analysed by the DSW laboratory. The control sample is used to monitor the accuracy of the laboratory
analysis and has target values of 10 g/kg for KCl, 127 g/kg for MgCl2, 35 g/kg for CaCl2
and 45 g/kg for NaCl. The QP considers it would be prudent to run additional control samples of lower and higher KCl grade, as well as ‘blank’ samples, to provide an additional check on the laboratory analysis.
|
| 23.2 |
Mining and Ore Reserves
|
| • |
Continue to progress existing projects including:
|
| o |
The conveyor to transfer salt back to the Northen basin (currently undergoing detailed engineering design) for commissioning planned in 2027. Costs for this project are included in
the capital and operating costs.
|
| o |
The second dredger for the Salt Harvesting Project (commissioning planned in 2027). Costs for this project are included in the capital and operating costs.
|
| o |
Following detailed design completed in 2022, continue design optimisation works for the Arava stream project to prevent erosion endangering the future stability of the eastern dykes
in the array of salt and carnallite ponds.
|
| 23.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
The DSW processing plant has operated in a steady state for many years. As such no further recommendations are made by the QP other than to continue with ongoing optimisation
studies.
|
| 23.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Consider more closely the requirement to disclose information more clearly and separately from the overall corporate responsibility report and information disclosed on the ICL
corporate website.
|
| • |
Consider implementing a formalised system of stakeholder engagement as a standard procedure.
|
| 24 |
| 25 |
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report,
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report, and
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources.
|
| 26 |
|
Qualified Person or Firm
|
Signature
|
Date
|
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
“signed”
|
February 27, 2025
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE HAIKOU MINING OPERATION, CHINA
February 27, 2025
|
|
Wardell Armstrong (part of SLR)
Baldhu House, Wheal Jane Earth Science Park, Baldhu, Truro, Cornwall, TR3 6EH,
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)1872 560738 www.wardell-armstrong.com
|
|
|
EFFECTIVE DATE:
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
DATE ISSUED:
|
February 27, 2025
|
|
JOB NUMBER:
|
ZT61-2273
|
|
VERSION:
REPORT NUMBER:
STATUS:
|
V3.0
MM1814
Final
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE HAIKOU MINING OPERATION, CHINA
|
|
|
Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong International Ltd,
Registered in England No. 3813172. Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom
UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Bolton, Bristol, Bury St Edmunds, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh,
Glasgow, Leeds, London, Newcastle upon Tyne and Truro. International Office: Almaty.
|
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
LAND AND PROPERTY
MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING
MINERAL ESTATES
WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
|
|
ICL GROUP LIMITED
S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE HAIKOU MINING OPERATION, CHINA
|
|
|
CONTENTS
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
1.1
|
Property Description
|
1
|
|
1.2
|
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
2
|
|
1.3
|
History
|
2
|
|
1.4
|
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
3
|
|
1.5
|
Exploration
|
5
|
|
1.6
|
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
6
|
|
1.7
|
Data Verification
|
7
|
|
1.8
|
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
7
|
|
1.9
|
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
8
|
|
1.10
|
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
9
|
|
1.11
|
Mining Methods
|
9
|
|
1.12
|
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
10
|
|
1.13
|
Infrastructure
|
11
|
|
1.14
|
Market Studies
|
11
|
|
1.15
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
11
|
|
1.16
|
Capital, Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
11
|
|
1.17
|
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
12
|
|
1.18
|
Recommendations
|
12
|
|
2
|
13
|
|
|
2.1
|
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
13
|
|
2.2
|
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
14
|
|
2.3
|
Sources of Information
|
15
|
|
2.4
|
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
15
|
|
2.5
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
15
|
|
2.6
|
Units and Abbreviations
|
16
|
|
3
|
20
|
|
|
3.1
|
Tenure
|
21
|
|
3.2
|
Agreements
|
23
|
|
3.3
|
Royalties
|
23
|
|
3.4
|
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
23
|
|
4
|
24
|
|
|
4.1
|
Accessibility
|
24
|
|
4.2
|
Climate
|
24
|
|
4.3
|
Local Resources
|
24
|
|
4.4
|
Infrastructure
|
24
|
|
4.5
|
Physiography
|
25
|
|
5
|
26
|
|
|
5.1
|
Ownership and Development History
|
26
|
|
5.2
|
Exploration History
|
27
|
|
6
|
28
|
|
|
6.1
|
Regional Geology
|
28
|
|
6.2
|
Local and Property Geology
|
30
|
|
6.3
|
Mineralization
|
31
|
|
6.4
|
Deposit Type
|
33
|
|
7
|
34
|
|
|
7.1
|
Exploration Drilling
|
34
|
|
7.2
|
QP Opinion
|
36
|
|
8
|
37
|
|
|
8.1
|
Sample Preparation and Laboratory Analytical Procedures
|
37
|
|
8.2
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
|
38
|
|
8.3
|
QP Opinion
|
39
|
|
9
|
40
|
|
|
9.1
|
Site Visits
|
40
|
|
9.2
|
Previous Audits
|
40
|
|
9.3
|
Drillhole Database
|
40
|
|
9.4
|
QP Opinion
|
41
|
|
10
|
42
|
|
|
10.1
|
Beneficiation Testing
|
43
|
|
10.2
|
Washability Testing
|
44
|
|
10.3
|
Flotation Testing
|
45
|
|
10.4
|
Comments on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
46
|
|
11
|
47
|
|
|
11.1
|
Summary
|
47
|
|
11.2
|
Mineral Resource Estimate Methodology
|
48
|
|
11.3
|
Drillhole Database
|
48
|
|
11.4
|
Statistical Analysis
|
50
|
|
11.5
|
Geological Modelling
|
52
|
|
11.6
|
Boundary Analysis
|
54
|
|
11.7
|
Grade Capping
|
55
|
|
11.8
|
Variography
|
56
|
|
11.9
|
Density
|
58
|
|
11.10
|
Grade Estimation and Validation
|
58
|
|
11.11
|
Mineral Resource Classification
|
61
|
|
11.12
|
Depletion
|
62
|
|
11.13
|
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
62
|
|
11.14
|
Mineral Resource Statement
|
62
|
|
11.15
|
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
62
|
|
12
|
63
|
|
|
12.1
|
Summary
|
63
|
|
12.2
|
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
64
|
|
12.3
|
Dilution and Mining Recovery
|
64
|
|
12.4
|
Cut-off Grade
|
64
|
|
12.5
|
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
64
|
|
12.6
|
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
64
|
|
13
|
65
|
|
|
13.1
|
Geotechnics and Hydrogeology
|
65
|
|
13.2
|
Mine Layout
|
66
|
|
13.3
|
Production
|
66
|
|
13.4
|
Life of Mine Schedule
|
66
|
|
13.5
|
Mining Equipment
|
67
|
|
13.6
|
Mining Personnel
|
68
|
|
14
|
69
|
|
|
14.1
|
Phosphate Beneficiation Plants
|
69
|
|
14.2
|
3C Chemical Plant
|
72
|
|
14.3
|
Processing Personnel
|
72
|
|
15
|
73
|
|
|
15.1
|
Surface Layout
|
73
|
|
15.2
|
Site Access and Infrastructure
|
74
|
|
15.3
|
Power
|
74
|
|
15.4
|
Water
|
74
|
|
15.5
|
Tailings Storage Facilities
|
74
|
|
15.6
|
Labour and Accommodation
|
74
|
|
16
|
75
|
|
|
16.1
|
Phosphate Market
|
75
|
|
16.2
|
Demand
|
75
|
|
16.3
|
Commodity Price Projections
|
75
|
|
16.4
|
Contracts
|
75
|
|
17
|
76
|
|
|
17.1
|
Permitting
|
76
|
|
17.2
|
Local Procurement and Hiring Commitments
|
77
|
|
17.3
|
Mine Closure Plans
|
77
|
|
17.4
|
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local
Individuals, or Groups
|
77
|
|
18
|
78
|
|
|
18.1
|
Capital Costs
|
78
|
|
18.2
|
Operating Costs
|
78
|
|
19
|
79
|
|
|
19.1
|
Economic Criteria
|
79
|
|
19.2
|
Cash Flow Analysis
|
80
|
|
19.3
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
82
|
|
20
|
84
|
|
|
21
|
85
|
|
|
22
|
86
|
|
|
22.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
86
|
|
22.2
|
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
86
|
|
22.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
86
|
|
22.4
|
Infrastructure
|
87
|
|
22.5
|
Environment
|
87
|
|
23
|
88
|
|
|
23.1
|
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
88
|
|
23.2
|
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
88
|
|
23.3
|
Mineral Processing
|
88
|
|
23.4
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
88
|
|
24
|
89
|
|
|
25
|
90
|
|
|
26
|
91
|
|
Table 1.1: Beneficiation Plant Production for 2022 to 2024
|
3
|
|
Table 1.2: 3C Chemical Plant Production for 2022 to 2024
|
3
|
|
Table 1.3: Summary of Exploration Campaigns at Haikou
|
5
|
|
Table 1.4: Exploration Drilling Summary for YPH
|
5
|
|
Table 1.5: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Haikou Mine - December 31, 2024
|
8
|
|
Table 1.6: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Haikou Mine - December 31, 2024
|
9
|
|
Table 5.1: Summary of Beneficiation Plants Production for 2022 to 2024
|
26
|
|
Table 5.2: 3C Chemical Plant Production for 2022 to 2024
|
27
|
|
Table 5.3: Exploration History
|
27
|
|
Table 6.1: Simplified General Stratigraphy of the Haikou Deposit
|
31
|
|
Table 7.1: Summary of Exploration Campaigns at Haikou
|
34
|
|
Table 7.2: Exploration Drilling Summary for YPH
|
34
|
|
Table 8.1: Summary of Internal and External Checks
|
38
|
|
Table 8.2: Summary of P2O5 Assayed Samples by Block and Modelled Stratigraphic Units
|
39
|
|
Table 10.1: Results of Mineral Sampling – Mining Blocks 1 and 2
|
42
|
|
Table 10.2: Carbonate-silicate Flotation Results for 0.300 × 0.038mm
|
43
|
|
Table 10.3: 0.150 × 0.038mm Carbonate-silicate Flotation Results (Block 2)
|
43
|
|
Table 10.4: Carbonate and Silicate Flotation Results for the Block 1
|
44
|
|
Table 10.5: Flotation Results for the Block 1 and Block 2 samples
|
44
|
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Haikou Mine - December 31, 2024
|
47
|
|
Table 11.2: Summary of Drillhole Database
|
48
|
|
Table 11.3: Example Drillhole Classification of Phosphate Layers to Grade I, II, and III Categories for Drill Hole ZK08-05
|
49
|
|
Table 11.4: Summary of Layers Included in the Geological Model
|
52
|
|
Table 11.5: Variogram Model Parameters
|
56
|
|
Table 11.6: Summary of Density Data for Haikou Deposit
|
58
|
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Haikou Mine - December 31, 2024
|
63
|
|
Table 13.1: Ore Mined from Haikou Mine (2022 to 2024)
|
66
|
|
Table 13.2: Haikou Life of Mine Schedule
|
67
|
|
Table 13.3: Summary of Mining Equipment
|
68
|
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for Haikou Mine on a 50 % Attributable Basis
|
78
|
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for Haikou Mine on a 50 % Attributable Basis
|
78
|
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for Haikou Mine on 50 % Attributable Basis
|
79
|
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for the Haikou Mine on 50 % Attributable Basis
|
81
|
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for the Haikou Mine on 50 % Attributable Basis
|
82
|
|
Figure 3.1: Location of the Haikou Mine, Southwest China
|
20
|
|
Figure 3.2: Location of the Haikou Mine in Relation to Kunming City
|
21
|
|
Figure 3.3: YPH Concession Area
|
22
|
|
Figure 3.4: Location of the Baitacun Deposit in Relation to the Haikou Mine
|
23
|
|
Figure 4.1: View of Block 3 Showing General Physiography of the Haikou Mine
|
25
|
|
Figure 6.1: Geological Map of Kunming Area (after Lecai Xing et al, 2015)
|
28
|
|
Figure 6.2: Structural Map of Yunnan Province [ZF=Zhongdian fault, JF=Jianshui fault, QF=Qujiang fault (after Stanka Šebela et al
2006)]
|
29
|
|
Figure 6.3: Local Geology of the Haikou Deposit (after Yu-You Yang 2014)
|
30
|
|
Figure 6.4: Haikou Concession and Mineralised Blocks
|
31
|
|
Figure 6.5: Example of Upper Layer Phosphate in Block 3
|
32
|
|
Figure 6.6: Schematic Vertical Section Across an Oceanic Margin (Simandl et al., 2011)
|
33
|
|
Figure 6.7: Genetic Model for Sedimentary Phosphate Deposits (Modified from Abed, 2013)
|
33
|
|
Figure 7.1: Exploration Drillholes at the Haikou Deposit
|
35
|
|
Figure 8.1: Sample Preparation Flowsheet
|
37
|
|
Figure 11.1: Histogram and Statistics for CaO%, CO2%, F%, Fe%, MgO%, and SiO2% in Upper Phosphate (PH1) and
Lower Phosphate (PH2)
|
50
|
|
Figure 11.2: Histogram and Statistics for P2O5% and AL2O3% in Upper Phosphate (PH1) and
Lower Phosphate (PH2)
|
51
|
|
Figure 11.3: Plan View of Geological Model for the Haikou Deposit
|
52
|
|
Figure 11.4: Geological Model of the Haikou Deposit showing Modelled Layers from INT1 to PH2
|
53
|
|
Figure 11.5: Example Cross Section of the Geological Model Showing Modelled Layers
|
54
|
|
Figure 11.6: P2O5 Boundary Analysis for PH1 and PH2 Domains
|
54
|
|
Figure 11.7: Example of Statistical Checks for P2O5 Outliers in PH1 Domain
|
55
|
|
Figure 11.8: Example Major (left) and Semi-major Axis (middle) Variograms and Variogram Map (right) by Thickness and P2O5
% for Lower Layer within Blocks 1, 2, and 4 and Block 3
|
57
|
|
Figure 11.9: Upper Phosphate (Green) and Lower Phosphate (Red) Limits as of December 31, 2024
|
59
|
|
Figure 11.10: Swath Analysis for P2O5 (%) for Upper and Lower Phosphate Seams at Haikou
|
60
|
|
Figure 11.11: Log Probability Plots Comparing Estimated P2O5 (%) Grades Against Input Grades
|
61
|
|
Figure 13.1: Haikou Life of Mine Design and Planned Mining Strips
|
66
|
|
Figure 14.1: Crushing Flow Sheet
|
70
|
|
Figure 14.2: Grinding and Flotation Flow Sheet
|
71
|
|
Figure 14.3: Scrubbing Plant Process Flow Sheet
|
71
|
|
Figure 14.4: 3C Chemical Plant
|
72
|
|
Figure 15.1: Surface Layout Showing the Haikou Mine, 3C Chemical Plant and TSFs
|
73
|
|
Figure 15.2: Surface Layout of the Haikou Mine
|
73
|
|
Figure 17.1: Progressive Restoration at Block 1
|
77
|
|
Figure 19.1: After-Tax 7% NPV Sensitivity Analysis
|
83
|
| 1 |
| 1.1 |
Property Description
|
| 1.2 |
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
| 1.3 |
History
|
|
Table 1.1: Beneficiation Plant Production for 2022 to 2024
|
||||
|
Unit
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
Source
|
||||
|
Ore mined from Haikou open pit
|
kt
|
3,223
|
3,646
|
3,575
|
|
Rock purchased from third-parties
|
kt
|
50
|
34
|
416
|
|
Rock from stockpiles
|
kt
|
343
|
399
|
232
|
|
Feed to Beneficiation Plants
|
||||
|
Flotation plant
|
kt
|
3,291
|
3,389
|
3,440
|
|
Scrubbing plant
|
kt
|
432
|
520
|
555
|
|
Total
|
kt
|
3,723
|
3,909
|
3,995
|
|
Phosphate Concentrate Production
|
||||
|
Flotation plant
|
kt
|
2,110
|
2,154
|
2,170
|
|
Scrubbing plant
|
kt
|
386
|
503
|
544
|
|
Total
|
kt
|
2,497
|
2,657
|
2,715
|
|
Table 1.2: 3C Chemical Plant Production for 2022 to 2024
|
||||
|
Unit
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
Phosphate Concentrate Feed
|
kt
|
2,497
|
2,657
|
2,715
|
|
Products
|
||||
|
Green phosphoric acid
|
kt
|
676
|
682
|
694
|
|
White phosphoric acid
|
kt
|
94
|
95
|
124
|
|
Speciality Fertilisers
|
kt
|
92
|
113
|
152
|
|
Fertilisers
|
kt
|
611
|
609
|
605
|
| 1.4 |
Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit
|
| • |
Block 1 – North central flank of the Haikou deposit with 12° strike orientation and plunging 5-10°.
|
| • |
Block 2 – Northwest flank of the Haikou deposit with 12° strike orientation and dipping 5-10°.
|
| • |
Block 3 – South to south-east flank of the deposit with a general strike of 120-130° plunging at 5 to 7° to southeast.
|
| • |
Block 4 – North-eastern flank with general strike of 32° plunging at 10° towards the northeast.
|
| • |
Top siliceous dolomite of no economic value.
|
| • |
The upper phosphate layer is of significant economic value. This generally comprises sandy phosphorite material on the upper parts, strips of phosphorite and dolomite
layers at the middle followed by pseudo-oolitic phosphorite at the base. This subdivision is not consistent throughout the strike length of the Haikou deposit and some of the middle layers appear to be missing in certain places.
Certain sections of pseudo-oolitic phosphorite are also thinner and occasionally distributed on the middle or top of the horizon. Conglomerate phosphorites are also present but are very sporadic with very small occurrences in the
middle or bottom of the horizon. The thickness of the upper layer varies from 2.5 – 11.0 m and is about 7.6 m on average.
|
| • |
Interburden consisting of interbedded phosphate bearing sandy dolomite – locally enriched with sporadic low-grade ore, within shallow oxidised zones, but not of economic
value. The average thickness of the interburden is 11.0 m.
|
| • |
The lower phosphate layer of better than marginal economic value. This has extremely stable and consistent bioclastic phosphorite on the top, followed by sandy phosphorite
at the middle and pseudo-oolitic phosphorite, stripped (dolomitic) phosphorite and silicious phosphorite at the bottom of the horizon. The thickness of the lower layer, which is lower grade varies from 2.0 – 9.0 m and is about 6.1 m
on average.
|
| • |
Base rock consisting of dolomite of the Dengying Formation of Upper Sinian (Zzdn) interbedded with silica textured stripes of no economic value.
|
| • |
Grade I (highest grade) > 30 % P2O5 – This category is weathered and most of the carbonates have been dissolved. It is soft and easy to mine,
requiring no blasting. However, its occurrence is in small patches, requiring highly selective mining. This category comprises less than 10 % of the Haikou deposit and was previously fed to the scrubbing plant for beneficiation.
|
| • |
Grade II (medium grade) 24 – 30 % P2O5 – Harder phosphate material requiring blasting and crushing prior to further beneficiation. This category
comprises around 25 % of the Haikou deposit.
|
| • |
Grade III (low grade) 15 – 24 % P2O5 – This is the hardest rock and requires blasting, crushing and grinding before beneficiation.
|
| 1.5 |
Exploration
|
|
Table 1.3: Summary of Exploration Campaigns at Haikou
|
||
|
Year
|
Group
|
Type of Exploration Work
|
|
1955
|
Southwest Geological Bureau
|
Regional geological mapping
|
|
1966
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Geological mapping of the northern limb of Xiang Tiachong anticline
|
|
1973
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Geological survey, core drilling and trenching of Blocks 1 and 2 of the Haikou deposit
|
|
1974
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Additional geological surveying, core drilling and trenching of Blocks 1 and 2 of the Haikou deposit
|
|
1980
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
Geological survey, core drilling and trenching of Block 4 of the Haikou deposit
|
|
2009 – 2014
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
Core drilling
|
|
Table 1.4: Exploration Drilling Summary for YPH
|
||
|
Year
|
Group
|
№ Holes Drilled
|
|
1966
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
7
|
|
1973
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
71
|
|
1974-1980
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
47
|
|
2009
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
37
|
|
2010
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
30
|
|
2011
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
85
|
|
2014
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
23
|
|
Total
|
300
|
|
| 1.6 |
Sample Preparation, Analyses, and Security
|
| • |
Sample (2.5 kg) crushed to -10 mm.
|
| • |
Drying at 150° C for 30 minutes.
|
| • |
Crushed to 3 – 4 mm until 100 % passing 4 mm sieve.
|
| • |
Splitting to produce a 600 g sample.
|
| • |
Sub-sampling to 100 g (remaining 500 g was retained, bagged and stored).
|
| • |
Drying at 150° C for 10 minutes.
|
| • |
Grinding until 100 % passing 100 mesh.
|
| • |
Sample is bagged and sent for analysis.
|
| 1.7 |
Data Verification
|
| • |
Open pit surface geology, mineralisation and lithological descriptions.
|
| • |
Extent of exploration work completed to date.
|
| • |
Review of core/sample logging, sampling, preparation and analysis procedures.
|
| • |
Core store.
|
| • |
Sample preparation and analytical laboratory.
|
| • |
Data storage procedures.
|
| • |
Review of drillhole databases.
|
| 1.8 |
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
| • |
In 1978, selected samples were taken from Blocks 1 and 2 and sent to the Bureau of Mines of the United States Department of the Interior for beneficiation testing.
|
| • |
In 1978 - 1979, the Chemical Mine Design Institute of the Ministry of Chemical Industry carried out washability tests on samples from upper and lower phosphate seams of
Blocks 3 and 4.
|
| • |
In 2007, the Research and Development centre of Yunnan Phosphating Group Co. Ltd. completed flotation tests on Haikou low-grade ore.
|
| 1.9 |
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
|
Table 1.5: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Haikou Mine - December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Contained P2O5
(Mt)
|
Contained P2O5
Attributable to ICL
(Mt)
|
|
Measured
|
3.0
|
22.3
|
0.67
|
0.33
|
|
Indicated
|
2.3
|
24.0
|
0.55
|
0.28
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
5.3
|
23.0
|
1.22
|
0.61
|
|
Inferred
|
0.2
|
20.0
|
0.04
|
0.02
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by YPH and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
Mineral Resources are reported in-situ and are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 4. |
YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of ICL. The reported tonnages and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5 attributable to ICL reflects the
Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns a 50% minority interest in YPH.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 15% P2O5 and a minimum seam thickness of 1.0m.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities ranging from 2.29 to 2.78 t/m3.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a beneficiation plant metallurgical recovery of 86.9%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using the average of the previous two year’s prices of $639/t FOB for acid products and $438/t FOB for fertilizer products and an exchange
rate of 7.20 RMB per U.S dollar.
|
| 1.10 |
Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
|
Table 1.6: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Haikou Mine - December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Contained P2O5
(Mt)
|
Contained P2O5
Attributable to ICL
(Mt)
|
|
Proven
|
44.5
|
21.6
|
9.6
|
4.8
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
44.5
|
21.6
|
9.6
|
4.8
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by YPH and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants.
|
| 4. |
YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of ICL. The reported tonnages and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5 attributable to ICL reflects the
Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns a 50% minority interest in YPH.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated at a cut-off grade of 15% P2O5.
|
| 7. |
A minimum mining width of 1.0m was used.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a beneficiation plant metallurgical recovery of 86.9%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using the average of the previous two year’s prices of $639/t FOB for acid products and $438/t FOB for fertilizer products and an exchange
rate of 7.20 RMB per U.S dollar.
|
| 1.11 |
Mining Methods
|
| • |
Clearing and grubbing – Includes equipment and labour required to clear vegetation from disturbance areas within the pit.
|
| • |
Drilling and blasting – Drilling and blasting typically of the overburden or interburden utilises 10 m deep holes using a 150 mm diameter drill. The burden and spacing are
typically 5 m × 4.5 m with a moderate powder factor. The phosphate ore is typically blasted when at least half of the ore is considered hard. Where the ore is amenable to free-digging, drilling and blasting is not required.
|
| • |
Overburden/interburden removal – Includes the equipment and labour costs necessary to remove all overburden and interburden material from the ore zones.
|
| • |
Ore mining – Includes the equipment and labour necessary to extract ore and deliver it to the primary crusher.
|
| • |
General pit support - Includes the equipment and labour required to maintain haul roads and perform other miscellaneous support tasks.
|
| • |
Progressive restoration is undertaken on areas where mining has been completed.
|
| 1.12 |
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
| • |
Ore mined from Haikou open pit;
|
| • |
Mining of surface stockpiles; and
|
| • |
Phosphate rock purchased from third parties.
|
| 1.13 |
Infrastructure
|
| 1.14 |
Market Studies
|
| 1.15 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting, And Plans, Negotiations, Or Agreements With Local Individuals or Groups
|
| 1.16 |
Capital, Operating Costs and Economic Analysis
|
| 1.17 |
Interpretation and Conclusions
|
| 1.18 |
Recommendations
|
| 1.18.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Update the geological model on a regular basis to incorporate detailed geological mapping as a greater proportion of deposit is exposed.
|
| • |
Preserve historic drill core contained in the existing core shed and consider relocating this core to a larger storage facility.
|
| • |
To further enhance the verification process, the QP recommends twinning drillhole pairs as part of any future exploration drilling programmes to allow for a more robust
view of sample representativeness.
|
| • |
In addition, to allow a more robust view of the accuracy and precision of sample preparation and laboratory analysis, the QP recommends future exploration drilling
programmes should include a full suite of QA/QC samples including duplicates, certified reference materials and blanks.
|
| • |
Locate and store all historical results of QA/QC checks and standard tests.
|
| • |
The QP recommends that a 3D block modelling approach should be considered by YPH for future Mineral Resource estimates. This would aid visualisation and communication of
the resource model and integration with mine planning, scheduling and regular reconciliations with production data.
|
| 1.18.2 |
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
| • |
The life of mine schedule assumes a reduction in mining rate at Haikou due to a permit requirement for an average ore mining rate of around 2.5 Mtpa over the total life of
mine. To maintain current production capacity, additional phosphate rock for processing will be purchased from third parties. In addition, the mining concession for the Baitacun deposit is currently in the process of being renewed by
YPH. It is recommended that technical studies should be undertaken to assess the potential for Baitacun as an additional source of phosphate rock.
|
| • |
The QP recommends that a schedule defining the annual feed to the beneficiation plants should be undertaken by YPH inclusive of mined, stockpile and purchased material.
|
| • |
Undertake regular reconciliations of mining production data against the geological model.
|
| 1.18.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
The YPH beneficiation plants and the 3C chemical plant have operated in a steady state for many years. As such no further recommendations are made by the QP other than to
continue with ongoing optimisation studies.
|
| 1.18.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Whilst the Haikou mine is in a constant state of progressive restoration of depleted open pits, it is recommended that a Mine and Facility Closure Plan is developed in
order to align with accepted international best practice.
|
| 2 |
| 2.1 |
Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
|
| 2.2 |
Qualified Persons or Firms and Site Visits
|
| • |
YPH main offices for safety induction.
|
| • |
Haikou open pit.
|
| • |
Stockpiles.
|
| • |
Core shed.
|
| • |
Sample preparation and laboratory.
|
| • |
Technical services.
|
| • |
Mining control office and truck dispatch.
|
| • |
Dry processing and crushing facilities.
|
| • |
Flotation plant.
|
| • |
Flotation and gypsum tailings storage facilities (TSFs) and tailings control office.
|
| • |
3C chemical plant.
|
| • |
Innovation and testing centre.
|
| • |
Workshop and truckstop facilities.
|
| 2.3 |
Sources of Information
|
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report.
|
| • |
Documentation for licensing and permitting, published government reports and public information as included in Section 24 (References) of this report and cited in this
report.
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report.
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources as listed below.
|
| • |
Ms. Chen Meshulami, Financial Director.
|
| • |
Ms. Dganit Hagag, Integration Manager.
|
| • |
Mr. Nadav Turner, CEO.
|
| • |
Golder Associates (WSP)
|
| 2.4 |
Previously Filed Technical Report Summary Reports
|
| 2.5 |
Forward-Looking Statements
|
| 2.6 |
Units and Abbreviations
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
°C
|
Degrees Celsius
|
|
2D
|
Two-dimensional
|
|
3D
|
Three-dimensional
|
|
AA
|
Atomic Absorption
|
|
AAS
|
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
|
|
ADT
|
Articulated Dump Truck (mining class of truck)
|
|
AGI
|
American Geologic Institute
|
|
AI
|
Acid Insoluble assays
|
|
Al2O3
|
Aluminium Oxide
|
|
ANFO
|
Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil (bulk explosive)
|
|
BAT
|
Best Available Technology or Best Available Techniques
|
|
BCM or bcm
|
Bank Cubic Meter
|
|
bhp
|
Brake Horse Power
|
|
BOT
|
Build-Operate-Transfer
|
|
Ca2+
|
Calcium ions
|
|
CaCl2
|
Calcium chloride
|
|
CaO
|
Calcium Oxide
|
|
Cd
|
Cadmium
|
|
CEMS
|
Constant Emissions Monitoring Systems
|
|
CO2
|
Carbon dioxide
|
|
COG
|
Cut-off Grade
|
|
CORS
|
Continuously Operating Reference Station
|
|
CRM
|
Certified Reference Materials
|
|
DAP
|
Diammonium Phosphate
|
|
Datamine
|
3D geological modelling, mine design and production planning software
|
|
EA
|
Environmental Assessment
|
|
EDA
|
Exploratory data analysis
|
|
EHS&S
|
Environment, Health, Safety and Sustainability
|
|
EIA
|
Environmental Impact Assessment
|
|
EIS
|
Environmental Impact Statement
|
|
EMS
|
Environmental Management System
|
|
EPR
|
Environmental Permitting Regulations
|
|
ESG
|
Economic and environmental, Social, Governance
|
|
ESIA
|
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
|
|
F
|
Florine
|
|
Fe
|
Iron
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
Fe2O3
|
Iron Oxide or ferric oxide
|
|
FOB
|
Free on Board / Freight on Board
|
|
FS
|
Feasibility Study
|
|
GHG
|
Greenhouse Gas
|
|
GIS
|
Geographical Information Services
|
|
GPS
|
Global Positioning System
|
|
GRI
|
Global Reporting Initiative
|
|
GSSP
|
Granular Single Superphosphate
|
|
GTSP
|
Granular Triple Superphosphate
|
|
GWh
|
Gigawatt hour
|
|
H&S
|
Health and Safety
|
|
Ha
|
Hectare (10,000m2)
|
|
HFO
|
Heavy Fuel Oil
|
|
HNO3
|
Nitric acid
|
|
HOM
|
Has Only Mineral Rights. On mine reference to an area within the concession with constraints on surface rights
|
|
HQ
|
63.5 mm diameter drill core
|
|
hr
|
Hour/s
|
|
ICL
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
ID
|
Identification (number or reference)
|
|
IPPC
|
Integrated Pollution Prevention Control
|
|
JV
|
Joint Venture
|
|
K
|
Potassium
|
|
K2O
|
Potassium oxide
|
|
kV
|
Kilovolt
|
|
kW
|
Kilowatt
|
|
kWh
|
Kilowatt hour
|
|
kWh/t
|
Kilowatt hour per tonne
|
|
LFO
|
Light Fuel Oil
|
|
LIMS
|
Laboratory Information Management System
|
|
LOM
|
Life of Mine
|
|
LTA
|
Lost Time Analysis
|
|
M
|
Million(s)
|
|
Ma
|
Million years ago
|
|
MAP
|
Mono Ammonium Phosphate
|
|
MAPGIS
|
GIS Mapping Software
|
|
mbsl
|
Metres below sea level
|
|
MGA
|
Merchant Grade Acid
|
|
MgCl2
|
Magnesium chloride
|
|
MgO
|
Magnesium Oxide
|
|
MKP
|
Mono Ammonium Phosphate+ Potash
|
|
MOP
|
Muriate of potash
|
|
MPK
|
Water-soluble Fertilizer
|
|
Acronym / Abbreviation
|
Definition
|
|
MRMR
|
Mining Rock Mass Rating
|
|
Mtpa
|
Million tonnes per annum
|
|
MW
|
Megawatt
|
|
MWh
|
Megawatt hour
|
|
NaCl
|
Sodium Chloride (salt)
|
|
NBTU
|
Not Belong To Us. On mine reference to an area within the concession previously with constraints on surface rights but acquired by YPH in
2024
|
|
NPS
|
Mono Ammonium Phosphate+ Sulphur
|
|
NQ
|
47.6 mm diameter drill core
|
|
OEE
|
Overall Equipment Effectiveness
|
|
P2O5
|
Phosphorus pentoxide
|
|
Pa
|
Pascal (measurement of vacuum gas pressure)
|
|
PFS
|
Prefeasibility Study
|
|
ppm
|
parts per million
|
|
QA/QC
|
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
|
QMS
|
Quality Management System
|
|
QP
|
Qualified Person
|
|
RAB
|
Rotary Air Blast
|
|
RMR
|
Rock Mass Rating
|
|
ROM
|
Run of Mine
|
|
rpm
|
revolutions per minute
|
|
SEC
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
|
|
SiO2
|
Silicon Dioxide
|
|
SLR
|
SLR Consulting Limited
|
|
SRM
|
Standard Reference Materials
|
|
SSP
|
Single Superphosphate
|
|
t
|
Tonne metric unit of mass (1,000kg or 2,204.6 lb)
|
|
t/a or tpa
|
Tonnes per annum
|
|
t/d or tpd
|
Tonnes per day
|
|
t/h or tph
|
Tonnes per hour
|
|
TSF
|
Tailings Storage Facility
|
|
TOC
|
Total Organic Carbon
|
|
TRS
|
(S-K 1300) Technical Report Summary
|
|
TSP
|
Triple Super Phosphate
|
|
UTM
|
Universal Transverse Mercator
|
|
Vulcan
|
3D geological modelling, mine design and production planning software
|
|
WAI
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
|
XRD
|
X-ray powder Diffraction
|
|
XRF
|
X-ray powder Fluorescence
|
| 3 |


| 3.1 |
Tenure
|
| 3.1.1 |
Haikou Concession
|

| 3.1.2 |
Baitacun Concession
|

| 3.2 |
Agreements
|
| 3.3 |
Royalties
|
| 3.4 |
Environmental Liabilities and Permitting Requirements
|
| 4 |
| 4.1 |
Accessibility
|
| 4.2 |
Climate
|
| 4.3 |
Local Resources
|
| 4.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
Open pit mine at Haikou including Blocks 1 – 4.
|
| • |
Beneficiation plants.
|
| • |
Fertilizer and acid processing facilities (3C chemical plant).
|
| • |
Run of Mine (ROM) crusher system.
|
| • |
Stockpiles.
|
| • |
Waste dumps.
|
| • |
Tailings Storage Facilities (TSFs) including flotation TSF and gypsum TSF.
|
| • |
Rail transportation facilities and load outs.
|
| • |
Power including:
|
| o |
National electricity grid connection and
|
| o |
Power produced by the sulphuric acid plants at the 3C chemical plant.
|
| • |
Process and potable water sources – supplied by national water network.
|
| • |
Truckstops and truck washes.
|
| • |
Stores and workshops.
|
| • |
Mine offices and change houses.
|
| • |
Administration offices.
|
| • |
Accommodation camp.
|
| • |
Cafeterias.
|
| • |
Medical services facilities.
|
| • |
Sample preparation facility and analytical laboratory.
|
| • |
Research and Development (R&D) facility.
|
| • |
Explosive magazines.
|
| • |
Port facilities and storage at QinZhou and Fangchengang.
|
| 4.5 |
Physiography
|

| 5 |
| 5.1 |
Ownership and Development History
|
|
Table 5.1: Summary of Beneficiation Plants Production for 2022 to 2024
|
||||
|
Unit
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
Source
|
||||
|
Ore mined from Haikou open pit
|
kt
|
3,223
|
3,646
|
3,575
|
|
Rock purchased from third-parties
|
kt
|
50
|
34
|
416
|
|
Rock from stockpiles
|
kt
|
343
|
399
|
232
|
|
Feed to Beneficiation Plants
|
||||
|
Flotation plant
|
kt
|
3,291
|
3,389
|
3,440
|
|
Scrubbing plant
|
kt
|
432
|
520
|
555
|
|
Total
|
kt
|
3,723
|
3,909
|
3,995
|
|
Phosphate Concentrate Production
|
||||
|
Flotation plant
|
kt
|
2,110
|
2,154
|
2,170
|
|
Scrubbing plant
|
kt
|
386
|
503
|
544
|
|
Total
|
kt
|
2,497
|
2,657
|
2,715
|
|
Table 5.2: 3C Chemical Plant Production for 2022 to 2024
|
||||
|
Unit
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
Phosphate Concentrate Feed
|
kt
|
2,497
|
2,657
|
2,715
|
|
Products
|
||||
|
Green phosphoric acid
|
kt
|
676
|
682
|
694
|
|
White phosphoric acid
|
kt
|
94
|
95
|
124
|
|
Speciality Fertilisers
|
kt
|
92
|
113
|
152
|
|
Fertilisers
|
kt
|
611
|
609
|
605
|
| 5.2 |
Exploration History
|
|
Table 5.3: Exploration History
|
||
|
Year
|
Group Engaged
|
Activity
|
|
1955
|
528 geological team of Southwest Geological Bureau
|
Carried out exploration and evaluation of Kunyang phosphate rocks. Carried out 1:50000 geological mapping and mineral survey and evaluation on the
peripheral areas from Jinning (Kunyang) in the south, Fumin in the north, Yimen and Bajie in the West and Jincheng in the East.
|
|
1966
|
Team 9 of Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Completed a preliminary exploration and evaluation of the Haikou deposit on the north wing of xiangtiaochong anticline with 1:5000 geological mapping.
|
|
1973
|
13th geological team of Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Completed the supplementary exploration work in Blocks 1 and 2 and submitted the detailed exploration report phase. The main physical work completed
included 1:2000 geological survey over 4 km2, drilling of 3,167 m, shallow wells of 425 m and trenching 1,1000 m3.
|
|
1974
|
13th geological team of Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Completed the supplementary exploration work in Block 3. Including 1:2000 geological survey over 4 km2, drilling of 1421 m, shallow wells of
99m and trenching of 1,135 m3.
|
|
1980
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
Completed the exploration of Block 4 including 1:2000 geological survey of 1.8 km2, drilling of 2161 m, shallow wells of 83 m and trenching of
7,491 m3.
|
|
1991
|
Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources
|
Approved the Haikou phosphate mining licence.
|
|
2008
|
Yunnan Geological Exploration Institute of Sinochem General Administration of Geology and mines
|
Completed the verification of resources and reserves in Blocks 1 – 4. Including 1:2000 geological survey and 1:1000 exploration line revision survey.
|
|
2009
|
Ministry of land and resources of the people's Republic of China
|
Approved the resource and reserve review and Filing Certificate of the verification report of Haikou phosphate rock resources and reserves in Kunming
City, Yunnan Province.
|
|
2010
|
Yunnan Geological Exploration Institute of Sinochem General Administration of Geology and mines
|
Completed the field geological work of resources and reserves verification within the mining area of Haikou phosphate mine. Including 6.38 km2
geological survey and 17.7 km2, 1:1000 exploration line revision survey and establishment of 18 GPS E-class network. Submitted in Feb 2011.
|
|
2011
|
Yunnan Phosphate group
|
Applied to the Provincial Department of land and resources for expanding the mining area and production scale. Approval was granted for expansion from
9.3118 km2 to 9.6022 km2. Production scale was expanded from 600,000 tpa to 2.0 Mtpa.
|
|
2012
|
Yunnan Geological Exploration Institute of Sinochem Geology and Mines Bureau
|
Completed Verification Report on Phosphate Resources Reserves in Haikou and submitted to The Beijing China Mining Federation Consulting Centre for review
and mining rights approval. The report and reported resources and reserves were approved accordingly.
|
|
2013
|
Yunnan Geological Survey Institute of Sinochem Geology and Mine Administration
|
Commissioned by Yunnan Phosphate Group Haikou Phosphate Co., Ltd. to carry out the 2013 dynamic measurement of the mine reserves of Haikou mine.
|
|
2014-2020
|
Yunnan Phosphate Group Engineering Construction Co., Ltd.
|
Completed annual reports on Dynamic Measurement of Mine Reserves.
|
| 6 |
| 6.1 |
Regional Geology
|


| 6.2 |
Local and Property Geology
|
| • |
Dengying Formation of Upper Sinian (Zzdn) - Yellow shale followed by 300 m thick layered dolomite.
|
| • |
Yuhucun Formation of Lower Cambrian (Ꞓ1y) - Phosphate rocks and interburden dolomite.
|
| • |
Qiongzhushi of Lower Cambrian (Ꞓ1g) - Pelletic siltstone.
|
| • |
Quaternary (Q) - Sandy clay (alluvial and pluvial clay and gravel).
|

|
Table 6.1: Simplified General Stratigraphy of the Haikou Deposit
|
||||
|
Age
|
Strata
|
Unit
|
Thickness (m)
|
Petrographic Description (Lithology)
|
|
Quaternary
|
Q
|
>40.0
|
Sandy clay; alluvial and pluvial clay and gravel
|
|
|
Lower
Cambrian
|
Qiongzhushi
|
Ꞓ1g
|
>75.0
|
Pelitic siltstone
|
|
Yuhucun
Formation
|
Ꞓ1y
|
0.92 – 14.03
|
Phosphate rock; sandy phosphate rock
|
|
|
1.76 – 22.46
|
Sandy dolomite
|
|||
|
2.55 – 17.33
|
Sandy phosphate rock; phosphate rock; phosphate rock with dolomite
|
|||
|
2.00 – 18.13
|
Layered siliceous dolomite
|
|||
|
Upper Sinian
|
Dengying
Formation
|
Zzdn
|
330
|
Yellow shale followed by 300m-thick layered dolomite
|
| 6.3 |
Mineralization
|

| • |
Block 1 – North central flank of the deposit with 12° strike orientation and plunging 5 - 10°.
|
| • |
Block 2 – Northwest flank of the deposit with 12° strike orientation and dipping 5 - 10°.
|
| • |
Block 3 – South to southeast flank of the deposit with a general strike of 120 - 130° plunging at 5 - 7° to southeast.
|
| • |
Block 4 – North-eastern flank with general strike of 32° plunging at 10° towards the northeast. This block is geologically more complex and is characterised by several
local faults with several metres of displacement.
|
| • |
Top siliceous dolomite of no economic value.
|
| • |
The upper phosphate layer of significant economic value. This generally comprises sandy phosphorite material on the upper parts, strips of phosphorite and dolomite layers
at the middle followed by pseudo-oolitic phosphorite at the base. This subdivision is not consistent throughout the strike length of the Haikou deposit and some of the middle layers appear to be missing in certain places. Certain
sections of pseudo-oolitic phosphorite are also thinner and occasionally distributed on the middle or top of the horizon. Conglomerate phosphorites are also present but are very sporadic with very small occurrences in the middle or
bottom of the horizon. The thickness of the upper layer varies from 2.5 – 11.0 m and is about 7.6 m on average. An example of the upper layer phosphate at Block 3 is shown in Figure 6.5.
|
| • |
Interburden consisting of interbedded phosphate bearing sandy dolomite – locally enriched with sporadic low-grade ore, within shallow oxidised zones, but not of economic
value. The average thickness of the interburden is 11.0 m.
|
| • |
The lower phosphate layer of better than marginal economic value. This has extremely stable and consistent bioclastic phosphorite on the top, followed by sandy phosphorite
at the middle and pseudo-oolitic phosphorite, stripped (dolomitic) phosphorite and silicious phosphorite at the bottom of the horizon. The thickness of the lower layer, which is lower grade varies from 2.0 – 9.0 m and is about 6.1 m
on average.
|
| • |
Base rock consisting of dolomite of the Dengying Formation of Upper Sinian (Zzdn) interbedded with silica textured stripes of no economic value.
|

| • |
Grade I (highest grade) > 30 % P2O5 – This category is weathered and most of the carbonates have been dissolved. It is soft and easy to mine,
requiring no blasting. However, its occurrence is in small patches, requiring highly selective mining. This category comprises less than 10 % of the Haikou deposit and was fed to the scrubbing plant for beneficiation.
|
| • |
Grade II (medium grade) 24 – 30 % P2O5 – Harder phosphate material requiring blasting and crushing prior to further beneficiation. This category
comprises around 25 % of the Haikou deposit.
|
| • |
Grade III (low grade) 15 – 24 % P2O5 – This is the hardest rock and requires blasting, crushing and grinding before beneficiation.
|
| 6.4 |
Deposit Type
|


| 7 |
|
Table 7.1: Summary of Exploration Campaigns at Haikou
|
||
|
Year
|
Group
|
Type of Exploration Work
|
|
1955
|
Southwest Geological Bureau
|
Regional geological mapping
|
|
1966
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Geological mapping of the northern limb of Xiang Tiachong anticline
|
|
1973
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Geological survey, core drilling and trenching of Blocks 1 and 2 of the Haikou deposit
|
|
1974
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
Additional geological surveying, core drilling and trenching of Blocks 1 and 2 of the Haikou deposit
|
|
1980
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
Geological survey, core drilling and trenching of Block 4 of the Haikou deposit
|
|
2009 – 2014
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
Core drilling
|
| 7.1 |
Exploration Drilling
|
|
Table 7.2: Exploration Drilling Summary for YPH
|
||
|
Year
|
Group
|
№ Holes Drilled
|
|
1966
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
7
|
|
1973
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
71
|
|
1974-1980
|
Yunnan Geological Bureau
|
47
|
|
2009
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
37
|
|
2010
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
30
|
|
2011
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
85
|
|
2014
|
Yunnan Chemical geological team
|
23
|
|
Total
|
300
|
|

| 7.1.1 |
Drillhole Location of Data Points
|
| 7.1.2 |
Core Sampling and Logging
|
| 7.2 |
QP Opinion
|
| 8 |
| 8.1 |
Sample Preparation and Laboratory Analytical Procedures
|

| 8.2 |
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
|
| 8.2.1 |
Standard Reference Material Samples
|
| 8.2.2 |
Duplicates and Replicates
|
|
Table 8.1: Summary of Internal and External Checks
|
||||||
|
Type
|
Blocks
|
№ Samples
Checked |
%Samples
Checked |
No Sample with
Poor Repeatability >= 2STD |
№ Samples
Reanalysed |
|
|
P2O5%
|
AI2O3 (%)
|
|||||
|
Internal
Checks |
1 and 2
|
2,020
|
100%
|
102
|
102
|
102
|
|
3
|
516
|
30%
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
4
|
192
|
23%
|
2
|
16
|
0
|
|
|
External
Checks |
1 and 2
|
288
|
14%
|
13
|
7
|
2
|
|
3
|
55
|
11%
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
|
|
4
|
55
|
29%
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
|
| 8.2.3 |
Sample Results
|
|
Table 8.2: Summary of P2O5 Assayed Samples by Block and Modelled Stratigraphic Units
|
|||||||||||
|
Block
|
Strat
Unit
|
Sample Count
|
Mean Sample Length
|
Min Sample Length
|
Max Sample Length
|
Block
|
Strat Unit
|
Sample Count
|
Mean Sample Length
|
Min Sample Length
|
Max Sample Length
|
|
1
|
INT1
|
137
|
2.11
|
0.25
|
13.35
|
4
|
INT1
|
55
|
1.95
|
0.30
|
7.43
|
|
1
|
PH1
|
566
|
1.14
|
0.20
|
4.09
|
4
|
PH1
|
199
|
1.30
|
0.13
|
13.94
|
|
1
|
INT2
|
388
|
1.22
|
0.40
|
13.34
|
4
|
INT2
|
87
|
2.75
|
0.28
|
15.08
|
|
1
|
PH2
|
367
|
1.13
|
0.15
|
9.75
|
4
|
PH2
|
91
|
1.27
|
0.26
|
11.27
|
|
1
|
INT3
|
194
|
3.11
|
0.20
|
64.57
|
4
|
INT3
|
68
|
1.38
|
0.25
|
10.55
|
|
1
|
Total
|
1,652
|
1.47
|
0.15
|
64.57
|
4
|
Total
|
500
|
1.63
|
0.13
|
15.08
|
|
2
|
INT1
|
22
|
3.81
|
0.86
|
15.89
|
3
|
INT1
|
85
|
1.81
|
0.30
|
15.30
|
|
2
|
PH1
|
119
|
1.33
|
0.39
|
12.53
|
3
|
PH1
|
212
|
1.25
|
0.27
|
5.32
|
|
2
|
INT2
|
66
|
2.03
|
0.56
|
18.50
|
3
|
INT2
|
103
|
1.53
|
0.42
|
9.31
|
|
2
|
PH2
|
71
|
1.51
|
0.44
|
23.20
|
3
|
PH2
|
273
|
1.25
|
0.20
|
6.77
|
|
2
|
INT3
|
50
|
2.04
|
0.63
|
12.74
|
3
|
INT3
|
53
|
1.43
|
0.22
|
10.67
|
|
2
|
Total
|
328
|
1.78
|
0.39
|
23.20
|
3
|
PH3
|
2
|
1.03
|
0.95
|
1.10
|
|
3
|
INT1
|
199
|
1.84
|
0.30
|
15.24
|
3
|
Total
|
728
|
1.37
|
0.20
|
15.30
|
|
3
|
PH1
|
646
|
1.25
|
0.20
|
3.06
|
3
|
INT1
|
22
|
3.92
|
0.40
|
13.28
|
|
3
|
INT2
|
234
|
1.34
|
0.20
|
9.33
|
3
|
PH1
|
24
|
1.13
|
0.60
|
3.24
|
|
3
|
PH2
|
615
|
1.28
|
0.02
|
9.91
|
3
|
INT2
|
12
|
1.97
|
0.72
|
8.41
|
|
3
|
INT3
|
141
|
1.53
|
0.11
|
14.28
|
3
|
PH2
|
135
|
1.16
|
0.19
|
11.27
|
|
3
|
PH3
|
5
|
1.10
|
0.97
|
1.20
|
3
|
INT3
|
11
|
2.09
|
0.22
|
6.09
|
|
3
|
Total
|
1,840
|
1.36
|
0.02
|
15.24
|
3
|
Total
|
204
|
1.56
|
0.19
|
13.28
|
| 8.2.4 |
Sample Security and Chain of Custody
|
| • |
Ensure absolute security over the samples, with defined chain of custody;
|
| • |
Prevent any mixing; and
|
| • |
Prevent exposure to rain and contamination.
|
| 8.3 |
QP Opinion
|
| 9 |
| 9.1 |
Site Visits
|
| • |
Open pit surface geology, mineralisation and lithological descriptions.
|
| • |
Extent of exploration work completed to date.
|
| • |
Review of core/sample logging, sampling, preparation and analysis procedures.
|
| • |
Core store.
|
| • |
Sample preparation and analytical laboratory.
|
| • |
Data storage procedures.
|
| • |
Review of drillhole databases.
|
| 9.2 |
Previous Audits
|
| 9.3 |
Drillhole Database
|
| • |
Review of geological and geographical setting of the Haikou deposit;
|
| • |
Review of extent of the exploration work completed to date;
|
| • |
Inspection of drill core to assess the nature of the mineralisation and to confirm geological descriptions;
|
| • |
Inspection of geology and mineralisation of exposures in the open pit;
|
| • |
Review of drilling, logging, sampling and analysis procedures;
|
| • |
An evaluation of minimum and maximum grade values and sample lengths;
|
| • |
Assessing for inconsistencies in spelling or coding (typographic or case sensitive errors);
|
| • |
Ensuring full data entry for each drillhole and that a specific data type (collar, survey, lithology and assay) is not missing;
|
| • |
Assessing for sample gaps and overlaps;
|
| • |
A review of assay detection limits;
|
| • |
Identification of problematic assay records;
|
| • |
A spatial on-screen review of the grade and lithology distributions of the drillholes was undertaken to identify any additional data reliability issues; and
|
| • |
A review of collar locations.
|
| 9.4 |
QP Opinion
|
| 10 |
|
Table 10.1: Results of Mineral Sampling – Mining Blocks 1 and 2
|
|||||||
|
Ore sample
|
Content (%)
|
||||||
|
P2O5
|
CaO
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
Fe2O3
|
Al2O3
|
F
|
|
|
Mixed sample in West Area
|
22.0
|
35.0
|
25.0
|
1.70
|
2.00
|
2.00
|
2.60
|
|
Mixed sample in East Area
|
21.2
|
35.2
|
22.9
|
2.91
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Upper ore bed in West area
|
25.4
|
36.7
|
28.6
|
1.03
|
1.73
|
2.24
|
3.11
|
|
Lower ore bed in West Area
|
20.4
|
32.6
|
28.7
|
3.26
|
1.77
|
2.75
|
2.52
|
|
Upper ore bed in East Area
|
23.4
|
37.2
|
20.7
|
3.12
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Lower ore bed in East area
|
19.0
|
34.1
|
23.6
|
5.15
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Ore sample
|
Content (%)
|
Content (ppm)
|
Content (%)
|
||||
|
Na2O
|
K2O
|
CO2
|
Organic carbon
|
S
|
U2O3
|
Cl
|
|
|
Mixed sample in West Area
|
0.08
|
0.08
|
4.00
|
0.10
|
0.02
|
21
|
-
|
|
Mixed sample in East Area
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Upper ore bed in West area
|
0.27
|
0.08
|
2.62
|
-
|
0.13
|
-
|
0.016
|
|
Lower ore bed in West Area
|
0.19
|
0.09
|
7.44
|
-
|
0.091
|
-
|
0.014
|
| • |
In 1978, selected samples were taken Blocks 1 and 2 and sent to the Bureau of Mines of the United States Department of the Interior for beneficiation testing.
|
| • |
In 1978 - 1979, the Chemical Mine Design Institute of the Ministry of Chemical Industry carried out washability tests on samples from upper and lower phosphate seams of
Blocks 3 and 4.
|
| • |
In 2007, the Research and Development centre of Yunnan Phosphating Group Co. Ltd. completed flotation tests on Haikou low-grade ore.
|
| 10.1 |
Beneficiation Testing
|
|
Table 10.2: Carbonate-silicate Flotation Results for 0.300 × 0.038mm
|
|||||||||||
|
Products
|
Heavy Measure
(%) |
Content (%)
|
Distribution
Rate (%)
|
CaO/ MgO Ratio
|
Chemicals
Dosage (kg/t)
|
||||||
|
P2O5
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
P2O5
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
Fatty Acid
|
Amine
|
Al2SiF6
|
|||
|
Screening concentrate
(2.54×0.3 mm)
|
34
|
31
|
16
|
0.7
|
44
|
21
|
19
|
1.4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Flotation concentrate
(0.3×0.038 mm)
|
21
|
28
|
23
|
0.5
|
25
|
19
|
9
|
1.4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Carbonate flotation
|
2
|
26
|
8
|
5.5
|
2
|
1
|
7
|
1.8
|
0.16
|
-
|
0.12
|
|
SiO2 flotation
|
7
|
10
|
77
|
0.2
|
3
|
20
|
1
|
1.3
|
-
|
0.2
|
-
|
|
Primary slimes
-0.038 mm
|
26
|
18
|
27
|
2.2
|
27
|
39
|
64
|
1.7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Total concentrates
|
55
|
30
|
19
|
0.7
|
69
|
40
|
28
|
1.4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Table 10.3: 0.150 × 0.038mm Carbonate-silicate Flotation Results (Block 2)
|
||||||||||
|
Products
|
Weight
(%) |
Content (%)
|
Distribution rate (%)
|
CaO / P2O5
|
||||||
|
P2O5
|
CaO
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
P2O5
|
CaO
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
|||
|
Phosphate concentrate
|
25.7
|
36.6
|
49.8
|
5.1
|
0.50
|
39.8
|
38.0
|
3.9
|
12.5
|
1.35
|
|
Carbonate flotation
|
16.8
|
22.2
|
34.6
|
28.5
|
2.30
|
15.6
|
17.3
|
14.2
|
40.3
|
1.56
|
|
Primary SiO2 flotation
|
2.6
|
11.1
|
15.5
|
66.9
|
0.70
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
5.2
|
2.0
|
1.40
|
|
Secondary SiO2 flotation
|
35.6
|
13.7
|
19.1
|
63.9
|
0.40
|
20.7
|
20.2
|
67.5
|
15.9
|
1.39
|
|
SiO2-Concentrate
|
11.5
|
32.6
|
45.7
|
12.3
|
1.00
|
15.9
|
15.6
|
4.2
|
12.2
|
1.40
|
|
Slimes Scrub
|
7.8
|
20.6
|
33.4
|
21.6
|
2.10
|
6.8
|
7.7
|
5.0
|
17.1
|
1.62
|
|
Total
|
100.0
|
23.6
|
33.7
|
33.7
|
0.90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
1.43
|
|
Mixed concentrates
|
37.2
|
35.4
|
48.5
|
7.3
|
0.60
|
55.5
|
53.0
|
8.1
|
24.2
|
1.37
|
| 10.1.1 |
Tests and Results of Block 1 Samples
|
|
Table 10.4: Carbonate and Silicate Flotation Results for the Block 1
|
||||||||||
|
Products
|
Weight
(%) |
Content (%)
|
Distribution rate (%)
|
CaO:P2O5
Ratio |
||||||
|
P2O5
|
CaO
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
P2O5
|
CaO
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
|||
|
0.038 mm concentrate
|
62.4
|
29.5
|
41.5
|
16.3
|
1.4
|
80.8
|
75.9
|
34.1
|
50.4
|
1.41
|
|
-0.025 mm concentrate
|
52
|
29
|
-
|
16
|
1.6
|
64
|
-
|
37
|
30
|
-
|
|
-0.038 mm concentrate
|
36
|
32
|
-
|
12
|
1.5
|
50
|
-
|
19
|
18
|
-
|
|
0.30 mm concentrate
|
10
|
24
|
-
|
18
|
3.8
|
10
|
-
|
7
|
12
|
-
|
|
Table 10.5: Flotation Results for the Block 1 and Block 2 samples
|
||||||||
|
Product Name
|
Weight
(%) |
Grade (%)
|
Distribution rate (%)
|
Dosage (kg/t) to feed
|
||||
|
P2O5
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
P2O5
|
SiO2
|
MgO
|
|||
|
Phosphate concentrate
|
47.5
|
30.4
|
17.7
|
1.1
|
65.7
|
29.6
|
28.3
|
H2SiF6:0.23
|
|
Carbonate floats
|
2
|
16.1
|
11.7
|
9.5
|
1.5
|
0.7
|
7
|
Fatty acids, fuel oil
0.49
|
|
Silica tailings
|
14.5
|
9.5
|
68.5
|
0.8
|
6.6
|
32.4
|
5
|
|
|
25 mm waste
|
5
|
18.1
|
16.0
|
6.7
|
4
|
3.6
|
16.5
|
NaOH:0.02
|
|
-0.038 mm Slimes
|
31
|
16.5
|
26.3
|
3.2
|
22.2
|
33.7
|
43.2
|
Amine: 0.25
|
|
total
|
100.0
|
22.2
|
27.5
|
2.1
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Na2SiO3:0.08
|
| 10.1.2 |
Second Batch 500 kg Mineral Test Results
|
| 10.2 |
Washability Testing
|
| 10.2.1 |
Testing Block 3 Mineralisation
|
| 10.2.2 |
Selective Tests for Block 4
|
| 10.3 |
Flotation Testing
|
| • |
The Haikou mine uses 4# collector and adopts a reverse flotation process.
|
| • |
The alkaline process is used for the Haikou ore. Because grinding is greater than 98 % of – 200 mesh, flotation requires small air charge, long flotation time, stable pulp
pH value (pH = 9.5-10.0); the process is easy to control.
|
| • |
For Haikou medium and low-grade phosphate rock, direct flotation is adopted. MgO inhibitors are added in the flotation operation.
|
| • |
Using 4# collector, the flotation temperature can adapt to a wide range (between 10-20 degrees), without solidifying.
|
| 10.4 |
Comments on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
| 11 |
| 11.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 11.1: Summary of Mineral Resources for the Haikou Mine - December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Contained P2O5
(Mt)
|
Contained P2O5
Attributable to ICL
(Mt)
|
|
Measured
|
3.0
|
22.3
|
0.67
|
0.33
|
|
Indicated
|
2.3
|
24.0
|
0.55
|
0.28
|
|
Measured + Indicated
|
5.3
|
23.0
|
1.22
|
0.61
|
|
Inferred
|
0.2
|
20.0
|
0.04
|
0.02
|
| 1. |
Mineral Resources are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Resources were estimated by YPH and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
Mineral Resources are reported in-situ and are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| 4. |
YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of ICL. The reported tonnages and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5 attributable to ICL reflects the
Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns a 50% minority interest in YPH.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 15% P2O5 and a minimum seam thickness of 1.0m.
|
| 7. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities ranging from 2.29 to 2.78 t/m3.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a beneficiation plant metallurgical recovery of 86.9%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Resources are estimated using the average of the previous two year’s prices of $639/t FOB for acid products and $438/t FOB for fertilizer products and an exchange
rate of 7.20 RMB per U.S dollar.
|
| 11.2 |
Mineral Resource Estimate Methodology
|
| 11.3 |
Drillhole Database
|
|
Table 11.2: Summary of Drillhole Database
|
|||
|
Drillholes
|
Metres (m)
|
Samples
|
Full Seam Composites
|
|
300
|
23,915
|
5,252
|
1,421
|
| • |
Grade I (highest grade) > 30 % P2O5 – This category is weathered and most of the carbonates have been dissolved. It is soft and easy to mine,
requiring no blasting. However, its occurrence is in small patches, requiring highly selective mining. This category comprises less than 10 % of the Haikou deposit and was fed to the scrubbing plant for beneficiation.
|
| • |
Grade II (medium grade) 24 – 30 % P2O5 – Harder phosphate material requiring blasting and crushing prior to further beneficiation. This category
comprises around 25 % of the Haikou deposit.
|
| • |
Grade III (low grade) 15 – 24 % P2O5 – This is the hardest rock and requires blasting, crushing and grinding before beneficiation.
|
|
Table 11.3: Example Drillhole Classification of Phosphate Layers to Grade I, II, and III Categories for Drill Hole
ZK08-05
|
|||||||
|
Drillhole: ZK08-05
|
East: 8200.5 North: 11988 RL: 2381.64
|
||||||
|
From (m)
|
To
(m)
|
Length (m)
|
P2O5
(%)
|
Geology Log
|
Layer
Code
|
Interpretation
|
Subdivision
|
|
0
|
18.76
|
18.76
|
-
|
Siltstone
|
INT1
|
INT1
Over-burden |
Waste
|
|
18.76
|
32.9
|
14.14
|
-
|
Argillaceous
Siltstone
|
INT1
|
||
|
32.9
|
35.88
|
2.98
|
-
|
INT1
|
|||
|
35.88
|
46.22
|
10.34
|
-
|
INT1
|
|||
|
46.22
|
51.09
|
4.87
|
2.58
|
INT1
|
|||
|
51.09
|
51.94
|
0.85
|
26.18
|
Sandy
Phosphorite
|
PH1
|
PH1
Upper Phosphate |
II
|
|
51.94
|
53.23
|
1.29
|
21.92
|
PH1
|
III
|
||
|
53.23
|
54.05
|
0.82
|
14.22
|
PH1
|
Waste
|
||
|
54.05
|
54.8
|
0.75
|
28.68
|
Banding
Phosphorite
|
PH1
|
I
|
|
|
54.8
|
55.8
|
1
|
30.6
|
PH1
|
|||
|
55.8
|
57.27
|
1.47
|
28.79
|
PH1
|
|||
|
57.27
|
58.45
|
1.18
|
26.64
|
PH1
|
II
|
||
|
58.45
|
59.74
|
1.29
|
29.68
|
Shamoolitic
Phosphorite
|
PH1
|
I
|
|
|
59.74
|
61.08
|
1.34
|
33.98
|
PH1
|
|||
|
61.08
|
62.08
|
1
|
35.03
|
PH1
|
|||
|
62.08
|
62.83
|
0.75
|
36.05
|
PH1
|
|||
|
62.83
|
63.99
|
1.16
|
10.61
|
Dolomite
|
INT2
|
INT2
Interburden |
Waste
|
|
63.99
|
64.99
|
1
|
11.67
|
INT2
|
|||
|
64.99
|
65.99
|
1
|
10.38
|
INT2
|
|||
|
65.99
|
66.76
|
0.77
|
14.31
|
INT2
|
|||
|
66.76
|
68.16
|
1.4
|
8.9
|
INT2
|
|||
|
68.16
|
68.94
|
0.78
|
2.74
|
INT2
|
|||
|
68.94
|
70.51
|
1.57
|
7.35
|
INT2
|
|||
|
70.51
|
71.54
|
1.03
|
16.13
|
Bioclast
Phosphorite
|
PH2
|
PH2
Lower Phosphate |
III
|
|
71.54
|
72.62
|
1.08
|
14.92
|
PH2
|
Waste
|
||
|
72.62
|
73.62
|
1
|
23.02
|
Sandy
Phosphorite
|
PH2
|
III
|
|
|
73.62
|
74.58
|
0.96
|
24.21
|
PH2
|
II
|
||
|
74.58
|
75.48
|
0.9
|
21.45
|
Banding
Phosphorite
|
PH2
|
III
|
|
|
75.48
|
80.56
|
5.08
|
6.35
|
INT3
|
INT3
Base Rock |
Waste
|
|
| 11.4 |
Statistical Analysis
|



| • |
A good grade partitioning is noted based on P2O5 % values for the interpreted upper and lower phosphate domains. To maintain continuity some lower
grade samples were included within both the upper and lower layers.
|
| • |
The upper phosphate layer contains marginally higher grade P2O5 % values and higher statistical variance compared to the lower layer.
|
| • |
The upper phosphate layer P2O5 % average grades steadily reduce moving from Block 1 to 4 and, except for Block 4 where the statistical variance is
highest, the variability reduces proportionally to the mean value.
|
| • |
The lower phosphate layer P2O5 % average grades show similar trends to that of the upper layer, however, the grade of Block 4 appears higher than the
other blocks and with higher grade variability.
|
| 11.5 |
Geological Modelling
|
|
Table 11.4: Summary of Layers Included in the Geological Model
|
|
|
Layer
|
Code
|
|
Overburden
|
INT1
|
|
Upper Phosphate Layer
|
PH1
|
|
Interburden
|
INT2
|
|
Lower Phosphate Layer
|
PH2
|
|
Interburden
|
INT3
|
|
Basement
|
BASE
|



| 11.6 |
Boundary Analysis
|

| 11.7 |
Grade Capping
|

| 11.8 |
Variography
|
|
Table 11.5: Variogram Model Parameters
|
|||||||||
|
Variable
|
Layer
|
Area
|
Axis Direction
|
Nugget
|
Sill 1
|
Range 1 (m)
|
Sill 2
|
Range 2 (m)
|
Azimuth
|
|
Thickness
|
Upper
|
1,2,4
|
Major Axis
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
400
|
0.4
|
800
|
35
|
|
Semi-Major Axis
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
200
|
0.4
|
400
|
125
|
|||
|
3
|
Major Axis
|
2.5
|
3
|
300
|
5
|
900
|
120
|
||
|
Semi-Major Axis
|
2.5
|
3
|
200
|
5
|
500
|
40
|
|||
|
Lower
|
1,2,4
|
Major Axis
|
2.5
|
5
|
300
|
12.5
|
1500
|
55
|
|
|
Semi-Major Axis
|
2.5
|
5
|
300
|
12.5
|
500
|
155
|
|||
|
3
|
Major Axis
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
200
|
0.4
|
600
|
120
|
||
|
Semi-Major Axis
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
100
|
0.4
|
400
|
30
|
|||
|
P2O5
|
Upper
|
1,2,4
|
Major Axis
|
2.5
|
5.9
|
280
|
9.1
|
750
|
20
|
|
Semi-Major Axis
|
2.5
|
5
|
450
|
7
|
800
|
110
|
|||
|
3
|
Major Axis
|
2.5
|
6.3
|
150
|
6
|
950
|
120
|
||
|
Semi-Major Axis
|
2.5
|
6.3
|
100
|
6
|
850
|
30
|
|||
|
Lower
|
1,2,4
|
Major Axis
|
2.5
|
6.3
|
290
|
7
|
650
|
50
|
|
|
Semi-Major Axis
|
2.5
|
7.3
|
200
|
5
|
550
|
140
|
|||
|
3
|
Major Axis
|
2.5
|
2.3
|
100
|
5.5
|
350
|
145
|
||
|
Semi-Major Axis
|
2.5
|
2.3
|
150
|
5.5
|
450
|
55
|
|||

| 11.9 |
Density
|
|
Table 11.6: Summary of Density Data for Haikou Deposit
|
|||
|
Area
|
Layer
|
Grade
|
Density
|
|
Block 1 and 2
|
Upper
|
I & II
|
2.62
|
|
Upper
|
III
|
2.42
|
|
|
Lower
|
I & II
|
2.55
|
|
|
Lower
|
III
|
2.55
|
|
|
Block 3
|
Upper
|
I & II
|
2.26
|
|
Upper
|
III
|
2.71
|
|
|
Lower
|
I & II
|
2.27
|
|
|
Lower
|
III
|
2.78
|
|
|
Block 4
|
Upper
|
I & II
|
2.35
|
|
Upper
|
III
|
2.35
|
|
|
Lower
|
I & II
|
2.29
|
|
|
Lower
|
III
|
2.29
|
|
|
Total
|
Upper
|
I & II & III
|
2.50
|
|
Lower
|
I & II & III
|
2.53
|
|
| 11.10 |
Grade Estimation and Validation
|

|
a) Upper Phosphate (X direction – 10m Panels)
![]() |
b) Upper Phosphate (Y Direction – 10m Panels)
![]() |
|
c) Lower Phosphate (X direction – 10m Panels)
![]() |
d) Lower Phosphate (Y Direction – 10m Panels)
![]() |
|
a) Upper Phosphate
![]() |
b) Lower Phosphate
![]() |
| 11.11 |
Mineral Resource Classification
|
| 11.12 |
Depletion
|
| 11.13 |
Prospects of Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources
|
| 11.14 |
Mineral Resource Statement
|
| 11.15 |
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
|
| 12 |
| 12.1 |
Summary
|
|
Table 12.1: Summary of Mineral Reserves for the Haikou Mine - December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
KCl
(%)
|
Contained P2O5
(Mt)
|
Contained P2O5
Attributable to ICL
(Mt)
|
|
Proven
|
44.5
|
21.6
|
9.6
|
4.8
|
|
Probable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Proven + Probable
|
44.5
|
21.6
|
9.6
|
4.8
|
| 1. |
Mineral Reserves are being reported in accordance with S-K 1300.
|
| 2. |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by YPH and reviewed and accepted by WAI.
|
| 3. |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants.
|
| 4. |
YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of ICL. The reported tonnages and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5 attributable to ICL reflects the
Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns a 50% minority interest in YPH.
|
| 5. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 6. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated at a cut-off grade of 15% P2O5.
|
| 7. |
A minimum mining width of 1.0m was used.
|
| 8. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a beneficiation plant metallurgical recovery of 86.9%.
|
| 9. |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using the average of the previous two year’s prices of $639/t FOB for acid products and $438/t FOB for fertilizer products and an exchange
rate of 7.20 RMB per U.S dollar.
|
| 12.2 |
Mineral Reserve Estimation Methodology
|
| 12.3 |
Dilution and Mining Recovery
|
| 12.4 |
Cut-off Grade
|
| 12.5 |
Mineral Reserve Statement
|
| 12.6 |
Risk Factors That Could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate
|
| 13 |
| • |
Clearing and grubbing – Includes equipment and labour required to clear vegetation from disturbance areas within the pit.
|
| • |
Drilling and blasting – Drilling and blasting typically of the overburden or interburden utilises 10 m deep holes using a 150 mm diameter drill. The burden and spacing are
typically 5 m × 4.5 m with a moderate powder factor. The phosphate ore is typically blasted when at least half of the ore is considered hard. Where the ore is amenable to free-digging, no drilling and blasting are required.
|
| • |
Overburden/Interburden removal – Includes the equipment and labour costs necessary to remove all overburden and interburden material from the ore zones.
|
| • |
Ore mining – Includes the equipment and labour necessary to extract ore and deliver it to the primary crusher.
|
| • |
General pit support - Includes the equipment and labour required to maintain haul roads and perform other miscellaneous support tasks.
|
| • |
Progressive restoration is undertaken on areas where mining has been completed.
|
| 13.1 |
Geotechnics and Hydrogeology
|
| 13.2 |
Mine Layout
|

| 13.3 |
Production
|
|
Table 13.1: Ore Mined from Haikou Mine (2022 to 2024)
|
|||
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
Ore Tonnes (kt)
|
3,223
|
3,646
|
3,575
|
|
P2O5 (%) Before Beneficiation
|
22
|
22
|
21
|
|
P2O5 (%) After Beneficiation
|
28
|
28
|
28
|
| 13.4 |
Life of Mine Schedule
|
|
Table 13.2: Haikou Life of Mine Schedule
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
2030
|
2031
|
2032
|
2033
|
2034
|
2035
|
2036
|
2037
|
2038
|
2039
|
2040
|
2041
|
2042
|
Total
|
|
|
Proven Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
3.34
|
3.20
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.19
|
2.27
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
44.5
|
|
P2O5 (%)
|
20.8
|
21.0
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.6
|
|
Contained P2O5 (%)
|
0.69
|
0.67
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.47
|
0.49
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
9.61
|
|
Contained P2O5 (%) Attributable to ICL
|
0.35
|
0.34
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.24
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
4.81
|
|
Probable Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
P2O5 (%)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Contained P2O5 (%)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Contained P2O5 (%) Attributable to ICL
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes (Mt)
|
3.34
|
3.20
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.52
|
2.19
|
2.27
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
2.31
|
44.5
|
|
P2O5 (%)
|
20.8
|
21.0
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.6
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
21.6
|
|
Contained P2O5 (%)
|
0.69
|
0.67
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.47
|
0.49
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
9.61
|
|
Contained P2O5 (%) Attributable to ICL
|
0.35
|
0.34
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.24
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
4.81
|
|
Waste (M m3)
|
13.90
|
13.00
|
4.27
|
4.27
|
4.27
|
4.27
|
4.27
|
4.27
|
4.26
|
4.79
|
3.55
|
3.55
|
3.55
|
3.55
|
3.55
|
3.55
|
3.55
|
3.55
|
90.0
|
|
Strip Ratio (m3/t)
|
4.17
|
4.06
|
1.70
|
1.70
|
1.70
|
1.70
|
1.70
|
1.70
|
1.94
|
2.11
|
1.54
|
1.54
|
1.54
|
1.54
|
1.54
|
1.54
|
1.54
|
1.54
|
2.02
|
| 1. |
Ore tonnes are Proven Mineral Reserves as presented in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 2. |
Mining losses and mining dilution applied as detailed in Section 12 of this report.
|
| 3. |
Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
|
| 13.5 |
Mining Equipment
|
|
Table 13.3: Summary of Mining Equipment
|
|||||
|
Machine
|
Manufacturer
|
Main Parameter
|
|||
|
Owned
|
Excavators
|
2
|
PC1250SP-7
|
Komatsu Ltd. (Japan)
|
Bucket capacity 6.7m3
|
|
1
|
PC750SE-7
|
Komatsu Ltd. (Japan)
|
Bucket capacity 4.1m3
|
||
|
1
|
EC700BLC
|
Volvo Construction Equipment Korea Limited
|
Bucket capacity 4.0m3
|
||
|
Articulated truck
|
2
|
VoLVoA40D
|
Volvo Articulated Trucks and Loaders Limited
|
15 m3
|
|
|
8
|
VoLVoA40E
|
16 m3
|
|||
|
5
|
VoLVoA40F
|
||||
|
Bulldozer
|
1
|
D9T
|
Caterpillar Inc. (USA)
|
13.5m3
|
|
|
1
|
D9R
|
Caterpillar Inc. (USA)
|
13.5m3
|
||
|
3
|
SD22
|
Shantui Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.
|
6.2m3
|
||
|
Loader
|
2
|
CLG856
|
Guangxi Liugong Machinery Co., Ltd.
|
Bucket capacity
3.0m3
|
|
|
Water truck
|
1
|
CLW5250GSS3
|
Hubei Chengli Special Automobile Co., Ltd.
|
14.7m3
|
|
|
1
|
EQ1250GFJ4
|
14.93m3
|
|||
|
Leased
|
Excavator
|
2
|
CAT®395
|
Caterpillar (Xuzhou) Limited
|
Bucket capacity6.5m3
|
|
Bucket capacity6.5m3
|
|||||
|
Wide-body vehicle
|
4
|
XDR80AT
|
Xuzhou XCMG Mining Machinery Co., Ltd.
|
26m3
|
|
|
Wide-body vehicle
|
4
|
TD96A
|
Shaanxi Tongli Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.
|
26m3
|
|
|
Auxiliary equipment
|
1
|
SG24-G
|
Shantui Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.
|
-
|
|
|
1
|
SR26H-G
|
Shantui Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.
|
-
|
||
| 13.6 |
Mining Personnel
|
| 14 |
| • |
Ore mined from Haikou open pit;
|
| • |
Mining of surface stockpiles; and
|
| • |
Phosphate rock purchased from third parties.
|
| 14.1 |
Phosphate Beneficiation Plants
|
| 14.1.1 |
Flotation Plant
|
| • |
Crushing – receives raw material (ROM) from the mine and reduces the size to less than 25 mm as shown in Figure 14.1:
|
| o |
Primary impact crusher receives its feed from the mine, after screening out the very large rocks (over 800 mm). The primary crusher reduces the rock size to 40 mm.
|
| o |
The under size of 100 mm screen and primary crusher product are fed to a 25 mm screen. The undersize is the final product and the over size is fed to a secondary cone
crusher for another size reduction. The secondary crusher is in closed circuit, in which its product goes back to the 25 mm screen.
|
| o |
The final crushed product is being piled in an 11 piles array that feed the grinding & flotation section.
|

| • |
Grinding & flotation – further size reduction to less than 74 mm and removes the main impurity, which is MgO:
|
| o |
The crushing section product is fed to two stages grinding circuit for (Figure 14.2):
|
| ◾ |
Grinding by rod mill in open circuit.
|
| ◾ |
Grinding by ball mill in closed circuit with a hydro cyclones cluster.
|
| o |
The grinding circuit product (overflow of the hydro cyclones) contains at least 85 % – 74 mm particles.
|
| o |
The overflow is sent to the first mixing tank, where sulfuric acid is added as pH modifier. The slurry from the first tank is transferred to a second tank where phosphoric
is added (as depressant) and collector.
|
| o |
The flotation circuit is a three-stage process:
|
| ◾ |
Rougher cells – first stage receive the fresh feed.
|
| ◾ |
Cleaner cells receive the rougher product as a final beneficiation.
|
| ◾ |
Scavenger cells– receives the reject (the flotation froth) from the cleaner to recover the P2O5 and reduce the losses.
|
| o |
The plant has two identical lines for grinding and flotation.
|

| 14.1.2 |
Scrubbing Plant
|

| 14.2 |
3C Chemical Plant
|

| 14.3 |
Processing Personnel
|
| • |
Production – 543
|
| • |
Maintenance – 207
|
| • |
Quality Control – 95
|
| • |
Research, Development and Engineering - 20
|
| 15 |
| 15.1 |
Surface Layout
|


| 15.2 |
Site Access and Infrastructure
|
| 15.3 |
Power
|
| 15.4 |
Water
|
| 15.5 |
Tailings Storage Facilities
|
| 15.6 |
Labour and Accommodation
|
| 16 |
| 16.1 |
Phosphate Market
|
| 16.2 |
Demand
|
| • |
More than 95 % of phosphate rock mined in the United States is used to manufacture phosphoric acid, which is used as intermediate feedstocks in the manufacture of
fertilizers and animal feed supplements. About 25 % of the wet-process phosphoric acid produced is exported in the form of upgraded granular diammonium phosphate (DAP), monoammonium phosphate (MAP) fertilizer, merchant-grade
phosphoric acid, and other phosphate fertilizer products.
|
| • |
Higher phosphoric acid prices will push India to rely more heavily on DAP imports and domestic production using imported phosphate rock and sulphur to build its DAP stocks.
|
| • |
Data shows that the total demand for phosphate rock in China will reach approximately 2.2 - 2.7 billion tons between now and 2050. This demand can be met by domestic
supply. China is now supplying phosphorus rocks to more than 50% of the global market.
|
| 16.3 |
Commodity Price Projections
|
| 16.4 |
Contracts
|
| 16.4.1 |
Acid and Fertilizer Sales Contracts
|
| 16.4.2 |
Other Contracts
|
| 17 |
| 17.1 |
Permitting
|
| 17.1.1 |
Air Quality Impacts Assessment
|
| 17.1.2 |
Effluent
|
| 17.1.3 |
Waste Management
|
| 17.1.4 |
Tailings Management and Monitoring
|
| 17.2 |
Local Procurement and Hiring Commitments
|
| 17.3 |
Mine Closure Plans
|

| • |
Haikou open pit;
|
| • |
Processing plant;
|
| • |
Waste rock storage facility;
|
| • |
TSFs;
|
| • |
Roads;
|
| • |
Water supply, storage, and distribution;
|
| • |
Water containment systems (e.g., storm water catchment systems and containment ponds);
|
| • |
Domestic and commercial waste;
|
| • |
Fuelling facility;
|
| • |
Power supply and infrastructure; and
|
| • |
Growth media stockpile.
|
| 17.4 |
Adequacy of Current Plans to Address Any Issues Related to Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals, or Groups
|
| 18 |
| 18.1 |
Capital Costs
|
|
Table 18.1: Life of Mine Capital Costs for Haikou Mine on a 50 % Attributable Basis
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
8.7
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
300.6
|
|
Total Capital Costs
|
$M
|
309.3
|
| 18.2 |
Operating Costs
|
|
Table 18.2: Life of Mine Operating Costs for Haikou Mine on a 50 % Attributable Basis
|
||
|
Unit
|
Total
|
|
|
Mining
|
$M
|
324.5
|
|
Processing (including G & A)
|
$M
|
1,470.5
|
|
Total Operating Costs
|
$M
|
1,794.9
|
| 19 |
| 19.1 |
Economic Criteria
|
|
Table 19.1: Economic Assumptions and Parameters for Haikou Mine on 50 % Attributable Basis
|
||
|
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
|
Mining
|
||
|
Mine Life
|
Years
|
18
|
|
Total Ore Tonnes Mined
|
Mt
|
22.25
|
|
Waste Volume
|
Mm3
|
45.00
|
|
Strip Ratio (Waste (m3) to Ore (t))
|
Ratio
|
2.02
|
|
Processing
|
||
|
Total Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
22.25
|
|
Grade P2O5
|
%
|
21.6
|
|
Processing Rate
|
Mtpa
|
1.24
|
|
Beneficiation Plant Recovery
|
%
|
86.9
|
|
Economic Factors
|
||
|
Discount Rate
|
%
|
7
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
RMB to $
|
7.20
|
|
Commodity Price
|
||
|
Acid products
|
$/t FOB
|
639
|
|
Fertilizer products
|
$/t FOB
|
438
|
|
Taxes
|
%
|
25
|
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
31.4
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
6.1
|
|
Revenues
|
$M
|
2,944.2
|
|
Capital Costs (including closure)
|
$M
|
332.7
|
|
Operating Costs
|
$M
|
1,794.9
|
| 19.2 |
Cash Flow Analysis
|
|
Table 19.2: Annual Discounted Cash Flow Model for the Haikou Mine on 50 % Attributable Basis
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Description
|
Unit
|
LOM Total
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
2029
|
2030
|
2031
|
2032
|
2033
|
2034
|
2035
|
2036
|
2037
|
2038
|
2039
|
2040
|
2041
|
2042
|
2043
|
|
Mining
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore
|
Mt
|
22.25
|
1.67
|
1.60
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.10
|
1.14
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
0
|
|
Waste
|
Mm3
|
45.00
|
6.95
|
6.50
|
2.14
|
2.14
|
2.14
|
2.14
|
2.14
|
2.14
|
2.13
|
2.40
|
1.78
|
1.78
|
1.78
|
1.78
|
1.78
|
1.78
|
1.78
|
1.78
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore Feed to Plant
|
Mt
|
22.25
|
1.67
|
1.60
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.26
|
1.10
|
1.14
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
0
|
|
Grade P2O5
|
%
|
25.6
|
25.8
|
25.5
|
26.1
|
25.1
|
27.3
|
29.2
|
29.8
|
28.1
|
26.7
|
26.3
|
27.9
|
25.1
|
24.8
|
26.3
|
25.2
|
22.9
|
24.2
|
21.2
|
0
|
|
Contained P2O5
|
Mt
|
4.81
|
0.35
|
0.34
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.24
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0
|
|
Recovered P2O5
|
Mt
|
4.18
|
0.30
|
0.29
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
0.21
|
0.22
|
0.22
|
0.22
|
0.22
|
0.22
|
0.22
|
0.22
|
0.22
|
0.22
|
0
|
|
Acid Products
|
Mt
|
1.86
|
0.14
|
0.13
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.09
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
0
|
|
Fertilizer Products
|
Mt
|
4.01
|
0.29
|
0.28
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
0.20
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0
|
|
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Acid Products
|
$M
|
1,186.8
|
85.6
|
82.8
|
67.2
|
67.2
|
67.2
|
67.2
|
67.2
|
67.2
|
58.5
|
60.5
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
62.1
|
0
|
|
Fertilizer Products
|
$M
|
1,757.4
|
126.7
|
122.6
|
99.5
|
99.5
|
99.5
|
99.5
|
99.5
|
99.5
|
86.6
|
89.6
|
91.9
|
91.9
|
91.9
|
91.9
|
91.9
|
91.9
|
91.9
|
91.9
|
0
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
2,944.2
|
212.3
|
205.4
|
166.7
|
166.7
|
166.7
|
166.7
|
166.7
|
166.7
|
145.0
|
150.1
|
154.0
|
154.0
|
154.0
|
154.0
|
154.0
|
154.0
|
154.0
|
154.0
|
0
|
|
Operating Costs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
324.5
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
1,470.5
|
113.8
|
109.3
|
83.8
|
83.8
|
83.8
|
83.8
|
83.8
|
83.8
|
69.5
|
72.8
|
75.4
|
75.4
|
75.4
|
75.4
|
75.4
|
75.4
|
75.4
|
75.4
|
0
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
1,794.9
|
131.9
|
127.3
|
101.8
|
101.8
|
101.8
|
101.8
|
101.8
|
101.8
|
87.5
|
90.9
|
93.4
|
93.4
|
93.4
|
93.4
|
93.4
|
93.4
|
93.4
|
93.4
|
0
|
|
Capital Costs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mining
|
$M
|
8.7
|
1.8
|
4.7
|
2.3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Processing
|
$M
|
300.6
|
16.8
|
17.4
|
17.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
0
|
|
Closure
|
$M
|
23.4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
23.4
|
|
Total
|
$M
|
332.7
|
18.5
|
22.1
|
19.9
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
16.6
|
0
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Royalties
|
$M
|
31.4
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
0
|
|
Other Government Payments
|
$M
|
6.1
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0
|
|
Pre-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
779.2
|
59.9
|
54.0
|
43.0
|
46.3
|
46.3
|
46.3
|
46.3
|
46.3
|
38.9
|
40.6
|
41.9
|
41.9
|
41.9
|
41.9
|
41.9
|
41.9
|
41.9
|
41.9
|
-23.4
|
|
Tax (25%)
|
$M
|
200.7
|
15.0
|
13.5
|
10.8
|
11.6
|
11.6
|
11.6
|
11.6
|
11.6
|
9.7
|
10.2
|
10.5
|
10.5
|
10.5
|
10.5
|
10.5
|
10.5
|
10.5
|
10.5
|
0
|
|
After-Tax Cashflow
|
$M
|
578.6
|
44.9
|
40.5
|
32.3
|
34.7
|
34.7
|
34.7
|
34.7
|
34.7
|
29.2
|
30.5
|
31.4
|
31.4
|
31.4
|
31.4
|
31.4
|
31.4
|
31.4
|
31.4
|
-23.4
|
|
Project Economics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
After Tax NPV (7%)
|
$M
|
363.7
|
44.9
|
37.85
|
28.15
|
28.3
|
26.45
|
24.7
|
23.1
|
21.6
|
16.95
|
16.55
|
15.95
|
14.95
|
13.95
|
13.05
|
12.2
|
11.4
|
10.65
|
9.95
|
-6.9
|
| 19.3 |
Sensitivity Analysis
|
| • |
Commodity price
|
| • |
Exchange rate
|
| • |
Operating costs
|
| • |
Capital costs
|
|
Table 19.3: Sensitivity Analysis for the Haikou Mine on 50 % Attributable Basis
|
|||
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Commodity Price ($/t FOB)
|
NPV at 7% ($M)
|
|
|
-20%
|
Acids $639/t
|
Fertilizers $438/t
|
91.8
|
|
-10%
|
Acids $575/t
|
Fertilizers $394/t
|
227.7
|
|
0%
|
Acids $639/t
|
Fertilizers $438/t
|
363.7
|
|
10%
|
Acids $703/t
|
Fertilizers $482/t
|
499.7
|
|
20%
|
Acids $767/t
|
Fertilizers $526/t
|
635.6
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Exchange Rate (RMB/$)
|
NPV at 7% ($M)
|
|
|
-20%
|
5.76
|
114.8
|
|
|
-10%
|
6.48
|
253.1
|
|
|
0%
|
7.20
|
363.7
|
|
|
10%
|
7.92
|
454.2
|
|
|
20%
|
8.64
|
529.7
|
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Operating Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 7% ($M)
|
|
|
-20%
|
1,435.9
|
529.9
|
|
|
-10%
|
1,615.4
|
446.8
|
|
|
0%
|
1,794.9
|
363.7
|
|
|
10%
|
1,974.4
|
280.6
|
|
|
20%
|
2,153.9
|
197.6
|
|
|
Variance from Base Case
|
Capital Costs ($M)
|
NPV at 7% ($M)
|
|
|
-20%
|
266.1
|
393.4
|
|
|
-10%
|
299.4
|
378.5
|
|
|
0%
|
332.7
|
363.7
|
|
|
10%
|
365.9
|
348.9
|
|
|
20%
|
399.2
|
334.1
|
|

| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 22.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Mineral Resources for the Property have been prepared to industry best practice and conform to the resource categories defined by the SEC in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
The exploration drillhole database contains 300 drillholes for 23,915 m and produced 5,252 analytical samples for P2O5.
|
| • |
Exploration drilling at Haikou has been undertaken on a spacing of 100 – 150 m with some infilling on 50 – 100 m where additional information prior to mining is considered
necessary. Mineral Resource classification by YPH considers Measured Mineral Resources to be generally within a drillhole spacing of 150 m, however, some areas can be assigned Measured Mineral Resources where the drillhole spacing is
greater than this and where there is high confidence in the geological and structural interpretation of these areas. Areas of greater than 150 m drilling spacing and where there is lower confidence in the geological interpretation
were classified as Indicated. Any remaining areas were classified as Inferred Mineral Resources.
|
| • |
The exploration drill spacing at Haikou is relatively close spaced for the deposit type and given the laterally extensive and stratiform nature of the deposit, the low
level of grade variability and the relatively simple local geology, most of the Mineral Resources at Haikou are classified as Measured. The Mineral Resource classification methodology and associated data were reviewed by the QP. The
QP is satisfied that the classification is appropriate based on the data available and the geological information and knowledge.
|
| 22.2 |
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
| • |
Mineral Reserves for the Property have been classified in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Reserves in S-K 1300.
|
| • |
Measured Mineral Resources were converted to Proven Mineral Reserves. Indicated Mineral Resources were not required to be converted to Mineral Reserves because sufficient
Measured Mineral Resources are available for the LOM up to the January 2043 concession expiry. Inferred Mineral Resources within the mine designs were not converted to Mineral Reserves.
|
| • |
Haikou is a conventional open pit operation with initial drilling and blasting and then utilising a range of diesel hydraulic excavators and haul truck combinations that
allow for a high degree of mining selectivity.
|
| • |
Haikou is mined using a combination of owner operated and contractor mining. Most of the mining operation is by contractor while YPH operates some overburden stripping.
|
| • |
The mine plan and sequence of mining activities is largely guided to ensure a uniform feed grade to the process plant and ensuring a stable economic cost through balancing
the strip ratio and sequencing of the ore and waste material.
|
| • |
The current life of mine is 18 years, based on an average ore mining rate of around 2.5 Mtpa over the total life of mine and a strip ratio of 2.02 (waste (m3) to
ore (t)).
|
| 22.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
Haikou is a typical phosphate mining operation in which ores are processed mainly in two stages:
|
| o |
Beneficiation stage which uses unit operations such as crushing, screening and flotation; and
|
| o |
Chemical processing stage that involves attacking the beneficiated ores with sulphuric acid to produce fertilizer products (MAP, DAP, TSP) and purified phosphoric acid.
|
| • |
Both stages and associated plants (at different locations) employ state of the art technologies, typical in the phosphate industry.
|
| • |
The beneficiation plants produce phosphate concentrate at a minimum grade of 28 %P2O5. The flotation plant is currently operating at capacity and
processes 3.4 Mtpa of phosphate ore while the scrubbing plant was re-configured in 2024 to a dry crushing process and currently processes around 0.5 Mtpa.
|
| • |
The concentrate is delivered to the 3C chemical plant for processing into saleable products. The 3C chemical plant is part of the YPH company and the processing facilities
have been operating for many years.
|
| 22.4 |
Infrastructure
|
| • |
The scrubbing plant had four process water ponds with a total volume of 4,000 m3 and one domestic water pond with a volume of 500 m3 and these were
removed in 2024. Replacement ponds were constructed within the mining area and included a new process water pond with a capacity of 3,000 m3 and a domestic water tank with a capacity of 150 m3.
|
| 22.5 |
Environment
|
| • |
Permits held by YPH for the Property are sufficient to ensure that mining activities are conducted within the regulatory framework required by regulations.
|
| • |
There are currently no known environmental, permitting, or social/community risks that could impact the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves.
|
| • |
Progressive restoration of areas where mining has been completed is undertaken by YPH with positive results.
|
| 23 |
| 23.1 |
Geology and Mineral Resources
|
| • |
Update the geological model on a regular basis to incorporate detailed geological mapping as a greater proportion of deposit is exposed.
|
| • |
Preserve historic drill core contained in the existing core shed and consider relocating this core to a larger storage facility.
|
| • |
To further enhance the verification process, the QP recommends twinning drillhole pairs as part of any future exploration drilling programmes to allow for a more robust
view of sample representativeness.
|
| • |
In addition, to allow a more robust view of the accuracy and precision of sample preparation and laboratory analysis, the QP recommends future exploration drilling
programmes should include a full suite of QA/QC samples including duplicates, certified reference materials and blanks.
|
| • |
Locate and store all historical results of QA/QC checks and standard tests.
|
| • |
The QP recommends that a 3D block modelling approach should be considered by YPH for future Mineral Resource estimates. This would aid visualisation and communication of
the resource model and integration with mine planning, scheduling and regular reconciliations with production data.
|
| 23.2 |
Mining and Mineral Reserves
|
| • |
The life of mine schedule assumes a reduction in mining rate at Haikou due to a permit requirement for an average ore mining rate of around 2.5 Mtpa over the total life of
mine. To maintain current production capacity, additional phosphate rock for processing will be purchased from third parties. In addition, the mining concession for the Baitacun deposit is currently in the process of being renewed by
YPH. It is recommended that technical studies should be undertaken to assess the potential for Baitacun as an additional source of phosphate rock.
|
| • |
The QP recommends that a schedule defining the annual feed to the beneficiation plants should be undertaken by YPH inclusive of mined, stockpile and purchased material.
|
| • |
Undertake regular reconciliations of mining production data against the geological model.
|
| 23.3 |
Mineral Processing
|
| • |
The YPH beneficiation plants and the 3C Chemical plant have operated in a steady state for many years. As such no further recommendations are made by the QP other than to
continue with ongoing optimisation studies.
|
| 23.4 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
| • |
Whilst the Haikou mine is in a constant state of progressive restoration of depleted open pits, it is recommended that a Mine and Facility Closure Plan is developed in
order to align with accepted international best practice.
|
| 24 |
| 25 |
| • |
Information available to WAI at the time of preparation of this report,
|
| • |
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report, and
|
| • |
Data, reports, and other information supplied by ICL and other third-party sources.
|
| 26 |
|
Qualified Person or Firm
|
Signature
|
Date
|
|
Wardell Armstrong International
|
“signed”
|
February 27, 2025
|

![]() |
![]() |
|
Richard Ellis
Wardell Armstrong International Ltd.
Baldhu House, Wheal Jane Earth Science Park, Baldhu, Truro, Cornwall,
United Kingdom TR3 6EH
|
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Summary Report entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE BOULBY MINING OPERATION, UNITED KINGDOM” with an effective date of
December 31, 2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F;
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Summary Report entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE CABANASSES AND VILAFRUNS MINING OPERATION, SPAIN” with an effective date
of December 31, 2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F;
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Summary Report entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE DEAD SEA WORKS MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL” with an effective date of
December 31, 2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F;
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Summary Report entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE ROTEM MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL” with an effective date of December 31,
2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F;
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Summary Report entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE HAIKOU MINING OPERATION, CHINA” with an effective date of December 31,
2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F;
|
| • |
the use and references to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 20-F, the Registration Statement (as defined below) and the Technical Report Summaries;
|
| • |
any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Summary Reports in the Form 20-F and incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement and the use of any
information derived, summarized, quoted, or referenced from the Technical Report Summaries, or portions thereof, that was prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of, and/or that was reviewed and approved by us, that is included
or incorporated by reference in the Form 20-F and the Registration Statement; and
|
| • |
the incorporation by reference of the Technical Report Summaries into the Issuer’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-205518) (the “Registration
Statement”) of the above items as included in the Form 20-F.
|

|
Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong International Ltd, Registered in England No.
3813172.
Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom
UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Bolton, Bristol, Bury St Edmunds, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh,
Glasgow, Leeds, London, Newcastle upon Tyne and Truro. International Office: Almaty.
|
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES
LAND AND PROPERTY
MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING
MINERAL ESTATES WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
|