|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
||
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
||
|
|
Date of event requiring this shell company report
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from to .
|
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
Number of Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Filer ☐
|
Non-accelerated Filer ☐
|
|
Emerging Growth Company
|
|
|
|
☐
|
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
☒
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐
|
Other
|

|
PART
I |
Page
| |
|
1 | ||
|
1 | ||
|
1 | ||
|
38 | ||
|
211 | ||
|
212 | ||
|
243 | ||
|
280 | ||
|
290 | ||
|
294 | ||
|
295 | ||
|
305 | ||
|
313 | ||
|
PART
II |
||
|
313 | ||
|
313 | ||
|
314 | ||
|
315 | ||
|
315 | ||
|
316 | ||
|
316 | ||
|
316 | ||
|
317 | ||
|
317 | ||
|
318 | ||
|
318 | ||
|
319 | ||
|
319 | ||
|
320 | ||
|
320 | ||
|
320 | ||
|
321 | ||
|
F-1 |
|
Bromine |
A chemical element used as a basis for a wide
variety of uses and compounds, and mainly as a component in flame retardants or fire prevention substances. Unless otherwise stated, the
term “bromine” refers to elemental bromine. |
|
CDP |
Carbon Disclosure Project – A leading
non-profit organization in the greenhouse gas emissions reporting field. |
|
CFR |
Cost and Freight. In a CFR transaction, the
prices of goods to a customer include, in addition to FOB expenses, marine shipping costs and all other costs that arise after the goods
leave the seller’s factory gates and up to the destination port. |
|
CLP |
Classification, Labeling and Packaging of
Substances and Mixtures– EU regulation. |
|
CPI |
The Consumer Price Index, as published by
Israeli's Central Bureau of Statistics. |
|
CRU |
Intelligence Company that provides information
on global mining, metal and fertilizers market. |
|
ICL ADS |
ICL América do Sul (formerly Compass
Minerals América do Sul S.A.). |
|
Dead Sea Bromine |
Dead Sea Bromine Ltd., a subsidiary in the
Industrial Products segment. |
|
MAP |
Monoammonium Phosphate, a fertilizer containing
nitrate and phosphorus oxide. |
|
GTSP |
Granular Triple Superphosphate, used as fertilizer,
a source of high phosphorus. |
|
GSSP |
Granular Single Superphosphate, used as a
phosphate fertilizer. |
|
Green Hydrogen |
Hydrogen produced by splitting water into
hydrogen and oxygen using renewable electricity. |
|
DAP |
Diammonium Phosphate - a fertilizer containing
nitrate and phosphorus oxide. |
|
EPA |
US Environmental Protection Agency.
|
|
EU |
European Union. |
|
FAO |
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations. |
|
FOB |
Free on-Board expenses are expenses for overland
transportation, loading costs and other costs, up to and including the port of origin. In a FOB transaction, the seller pays the FOB expenses,
and the buyer pays the other costs from the port of origin onwards. |
|
CPT |
Cost Per Tonne. |
|
CIF
|
Cost, Insurance, and Freight. In a CIF transaction,
the price of goods includes, as well as FOB expenses, the expenses for insurance, shipping and any other costs that arise after the goods
leave the factory gates and up to the destination port. |
|
ICL Haifa (Fertilizers & Chemicals)
|
Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., a subsidiary
in the Growing Solutions segment. |
|
GHG |
Greenhouse Gases – air emissions contributing
to climate change. |
|
Granular |
Fertilizer containing granular particles.
|
|
ICL Boulby |
A UK subsidiary in the Potash segment.
|
|
ICL Iberia (Iberpotash) |
Iberpotash S.A., a Spanish subsidiary
in the Potash segment. |
|
IC |
Israel Corporation Ltd. |
|
Indicated Mineral Resource |
That part of a mineral resource for which
quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty
associated with an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail
to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because an indicated mineral resource has a lower level
of confidence than the level of confidence of a measured mineral resource, an indicated mineral resource may only be converted to a probable
mineral reserve. |
|
Inferred Mineral Resource |
That part of a mineral resource for which
quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological uncertainty
associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects
of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Because an inferred mineral resource has the lowest level
of geological confidence of all mineral resources, which prevents the application of the modifying factors in a manner useful for evaluation
of economic viability, an inferred mineral resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project and
may not be converted to a mineral reserve. |
|
DSW |
Dead Sea Works Ltd., a subsidiary in
the Potash segment. |
|
DSM |
Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd., a subsidiary
in the Potash segment. |
|
ICL Neot Hovav |
Subsidiaries in the Neot Hovav area in the
south of Israel, including facilities of Bromine Compounds Ltd included in the Industrial Products segment. |
|
ICL Rotem |
Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd., a subsidiary
in the Phosphate Solutions segment. |
|
IFA |
The International Fertilizers Industry Association,
an international association of fertilizers manufacturers. |
|
ILA |
Israel Land Authority. |
|
IMF |
International Monetary Fund. |
|
K |
The element potassium, one of three main plant
nutrients. |
|
KNO3
|
Potassium Nitrate, a soluble fertilizer containing
N&P used as a stand-alone product or as a key component of some water-soluble blends. |
|
KOH |
Potassium hydroxide 50% liquid. |
|
MGA |
Merchant grade phosphoric acid. |
|
Measured Mineral Resource |
That part of a mineral resource for which
quantity and grade or quality are estimated and based on conclusive geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty
associated with a measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors, as defined in this section,
in sufficient detail to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because a measured
mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than the level of confidence of either an indicated mineral resource or an inferred
mineral resource, a measured mineral resource may be converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral reserve. |
|
Mineral Reserve |
An estimate of tonnage and grade or quality
of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project.
More specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials
and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted. |
|
Mineral Resource |
A concentration or occurrence of material
of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic
extraction. A mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade,
likely mining dimensions, location or continuity, that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely
to, in whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled.
|
|
MoEP |
Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection.
|
|
N |
The element nitrogen, one of three main plant
nutrients. |
|
P |
The element phosphorus, one of three main
plant nutrients, that is also used as a raw material in industry. |
|
PK |
Complex fertilizer comprised primarily of
two primary nutrients (P.K). |
|
NPK |
Complex fertilizer comprised primarily of
three primary nutrients (N.P.K). |
|
NYSE |
The New York Stock Exchange. |
|
Phosphate |
Phosphate rock that contains the element phosphorus.
Its concentration is measured in units of P2O5.
|
|
Polyhalite |
A mineral marketed by ICL under the brand
name Polysulphate™, composed of potash, sulphur, calcium, and magnesium. Used in its natural form as a fully soluble and natural
fertilizer, which is also used for organic agriculture and as a raw material for production of fertilizers. |
|
Probable Mineral Reserve |
The economically mineable part of an Indicated
and, in some cases, a Measured Mineral Resource. Quantity, grade and/or quality of Probable Mineral Reserves are computed from information
similar to that used for Proven Mineral Reserves, but the sites for survey, sampling and measurement are further apart or are otherwise
less efficiently spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between
points of observation. |
|
Proven Mineral Reserve |
The economically mineable part of a Measured
Mineral Resource. Proven Mineral Reserve quantities are computed from information received from explorations, channels, wells, and drilling;
grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling. The sites for inspection, sampling and measurement for proven
reserves are spaced so closely to each other so that the geologic character is well defined so the size, shape, depth and mineral content
of reserves can be reliably determined. |
|
Chlorine |
A chemical, raw material in various productions
process. A byproduct of Dead Sea Magnesium production. |
|
Sylvinite |
A byproduct from the production of Magnesium
from the raw material – Carnallite. Transferred to DSW as an additional source for potash production. |
|
Polymer |
A chemical compound containing a long chain
of repeating units linked by a chemical bond and created by polymerization. |
|
Potash |
Potassium chloride (KCl), used as a plant’s
main source of potassium. |
|
P2O5
|
Phosphorus pentoxide. |
|
TCFD |
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures.
|
|
REACH |
Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and
Restriction of Chemicals, a framework within the EU. |
|
Reserves |
The part of a mineral deposit that could be
economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the Mineral Reserve determination. Reserves are divided between “proven
reserves” and “probable reserves”. |
|
Salt |
Unless otherwise specified, sodium chloride
(NaCl). |
|
S |
Sulphur – a chemical used for the production
of sulfuric acid for sulfate and phosphate fertilizers, and other chemical processes. |
|
Soluble NPK |
Soluble fertilizer containing the three basic
elements for plant development (nitrogen, phosphorus and potash). |
|
Standard |
Fertilizer has small particles. |
|
Tami |
Tami (IMI) Research and Development Institute Ltd.,
the central research institute of ICL. |
|
TASE |
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, Ltd. |
|
USDA |
United States Department of Agriculture.
|
|
WPA |
White Phosphoric Acid, purified from MGA.
|
|
UK |
The United Kingdom. |
|
Urea |
A white granular or pill solid fertilizer
containing 46% nitrogen. |
|
YTH/YPC |
The Chinese partner in the Company’s
joint venture YPH in China. |
|
4D |
Clean green phosphoric acid, used as a raw
material for purification processes. |
|
PM |
Particular matter. |
| A. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
| B. |
CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS |
| C. |
REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
| • |
Our mineral extraction operations are dependent on concessions,
licenses and permits granted to us by the respective governments in the countries in which we operate, including the concession for our
operations at the Dead Sea in Israel, which is expected to expire in March 2030. |
| • |
Our ability to operate and/or expand our production and operating
facilities worldwide is dependent on our receipt of, and compliance
with, permits issued by governmental authorities. A decision by a government authority to deny any of our permit applications may adversely
affect the Company’s business and operations. |
| • |
Our operations and sales are exposed to high volatility in supply
and demand, pricing fluctuations in commodity markets, expansion of production capacity and competition from some of the world’s
largest chemical and mining companies, as well as mergers of key producer/customer/supplier. |
| • |
Compliance with, and changes in, environmental laws and regulations
could require us to make substantial capital expenditures and incur costs and liabilities and adversely affect our performance.
|
| • |
We are exposed to risks related to physical climate change and
natural disasters, such as earthquakes, impacts of climate-related transition risks, including current and future laws and regulations,
as well as other factors resulting from climate change, which could adversely impact on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity. |
| • |
Our operations could be adversely affected by price increases
or shortages with respect to water, energy and our principal raw materials. |
| • |
The accumulation of salt at the bottom of Pond 5, the central
evaporation pond in our solar evaporation ponds system used to extract minerals from the Dead Sea in Israel, requires regular harvesting
of salt to maintain a fixed brine volume and thereby sustain the production capacity of extracted minerals and prevent potential damage
to the foundations and structures of hotels and other buildings situated close to the edge of the pond. |
| • |
We are exposed to risks associated with our international activities,
which could adversely affect our sales, operations, and assets in various countries. Some of these factors may also make it less attractive
or more difficult to distribute cash generated by our operations outside Israel to shareholders, use cash from one country to fund operations
or repayments of indebtedness in another, or support other corporate purposes, including the distribution of dividends. |
| • |
Changes in valuations and estimates, which serve as a basis for
analyzing our contingent liabilities and for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities, including provisions for waste
removal and the reclamation of mines, may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
| • |
As a multinational company, our financial results may be adversely
affected by currency fluctuations and restrictions, as well as by credit risks. |
| • |
Due to the nature of our operations, we may be exposed to the
risk of adverse ecological events, which may result in impacts that exceed the boundaries of our facilities, cause environmental damage
or damage to human health/life and lead to the shutdown of our sites or administrative, civil and/or criminal proceedings. |
| • |
Accidents occurring during our industrial and mining operations,
including failure to ensure the safety of our workers and processes, could adversely affect our business. |
| • |
Geological and mining conditions and/or effects of prior mining
that may not be fully identified/assessed within the available data or that may differ from those based on our experience;
|
| • |
Assumptions concerning future prices of products, operating costs,
updates to the statistical model and geological parameters according to past experience and developing practices in this field, mining
technology improvements, development costs and reclamation costs; and |
| • |
Assumptions concerning future effects of regulation, including
the issuance of required permits and taxes imposed by governmental agencies. |
| • |
Difficulties and costs associated with complying with a wide
variety of complex laws, treaties and regulations, including the US. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), the UK. Bribery
Act of 2010, Section 291A of the Israeli Penal Law and similar laws in the jurisdictions in which we sell or operate; |
| • |
Unexpected changes in regulatory environments and increased government
ownership and regulation in the countries in which we operate; |
| • |
Political and economic instability, including civil unrest, inflation
and adverse economic conditions resulting from governmental attempts to reduce inflation, such as imposition of higher interest rates
and wage and price controls; |
| • |
Public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics; and
|
| • |
The imposition of tariffs, exchange controls, trade barriers
or sanctions, new taxes or tax rates or other restrictions, including the current trade dispute between the US and China. |
| • |
The duration, severity and extent of a war, along with the necessary
measures undertaken by government authorities or other organizations to manage and mitigate its effects. |
| • |
The possibility of temporary closures of our facilities or the
facilities of our suppliers, customers, their contract manufacturers, and the possibility of certain industries shutting down. |
| • |
The ability to purchase raw materials in times of shortages resulting
from supply chain disruptions and production shutdowns. |
| • |
The ability of our suppliers, contractors and third-party providers
to meet their obligations to us at previously anticipated costs and timelines without significant disruption. |
| • |
Our ability to continue to meet the manufacturing and supply
arrangements with our customers at previously anticipated costs and timelines without significant disruption. |
| • |
The duration and severity of the sustained global or local recession,
and the uncertainty as to when economy will fully recover. |
| • |
Significant disruption of global financial markets and credit
markets, which may reduce our ability to access capital or our customers’ ability to pay us for past or future purchases, which
could negatively affect our liquidity. |
| • |
Some government incentive programs may be discontinued, expired,
cancelled or changed. |
| • |
Governments may initiate new legislation or amend existing legislation
in order to impose additional and/or increased fiscal liabilities on our business, such as additional royalties, natural resource taxes
or required investments, as has occurred in Israel, for example, with respect to the Law for Taxation of Profits from Natural Resources.
|
| • |
The applicable tax rates may increase. |
| • |
We may no longer be able to meet the requirements for continuing
to qualify for some incentive programs. |
| • |
Changes in trade agreements between countries, such as in the
trade agreements between the United States and China. |
| • |
Changes in international taxation laws, as may be adopted by
several countries we operate in, or sell to, may result in additional taxes or high tax rates being imposed on our operations. |
| • |
The composition of our Board of Directors (other than external
directors, as described under “Item 6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees— C. Board Practices”. |
| • |
Mergers, acquisitions, divestitures or other business combinations.
|
| • |
Future issuances of ordinary shares or other securities.
|
| • |
Amendments to our Articles of Association, excluding provisions
of the Articles of Association that were determined by virtue of the Special State Share. |
| • |
Dividend distribution policy. |
| • |
Expiration or termination of licenses and/or concessions.
|
| • |
Uncertainties and developments related to the DSW concession.
|
| • |
General stock market conditions. |
| • |
Decisions by governmental authorities affect our business.
|
| • |
Significant legal rulings impacting our operations and financial
results. |
| • |
Variations in our and our competitors’ results of operations.
|
| • |
Changes in earnings estimates or analyst recommendations.
|
| • |
Broader market dynamics and other factors, including factors
unrelated to our operating performance. |
| • |
In January 2026, the Company acquired 49.9% of Bartek Ingredients'
shares. Bartek is a global leader in food-grade malic and fumaric acids, serving hundreds of customers and distributors across the food,
beverage, confectionery, bakery and other end-markets worldwide. These functional food ingredients are used by food and beverage companies
to enhance flavor profiles, extend shelf life, and improve overall product quality. |
| • |
In July 2024, the Company acquired Custom Ag Formulators (CAF),
a North American provider of customized agriculture formulations and products customized for growers. CAF offers a diverse assortment
of liquid adjuvants and enhanced nutrients, as well as various other specialty products. |
| • |
In February 2024, the Company acquired Nitro 1000, a manufacturer,
developer and provider of biological crop inputs in Brazil. Nitro 1000’s products mainly target soybean, corn and sugar cane crops,
and their application replaces or optimizes the use of fertilizers. These products help farmers increase profitability, as well as offer
more sustainable options. |
| • |
Access to one of the world’s richest, longest‑life
and lowest‑cost sources of potash and bromine (the Dead Sea). |
| • |
A potash mine and processing facilities in Spain. |
| • |
Bromine compounds processing facilities in Israel, the Netherlands
and China. |
| • |
A unique integrated phosphate value chain that extends from phosphate
rock mines in Israel and in China to value‑added downstream products produced in facilities located in Israel, Europe, the US, Brazil,
Australia and China. Our specialty phosphates serve the food industry by providing texture and stability solutions to the meat, meat alternatives,
poultry, sea food, dairy and bakery markets, as well as numerous other industrial markets, such as metal treatment, water treatment, oral
care, carbonated drinks, asphalt modification, paints and coatings and more. |
| • |
Polysulphate® resources in the UK. |
| • |
Customized, highly effective specialty fertilizers that provide
improved value to growers, provide essential plant nutrition, optimize crop yields, and reduce environmental impact. |
| • |
A focused and highly experienced team of technical experts that
develop production processes, new applications, formulations and products for our agricultural and industrial markets. |
| • |
A strong crop nutrition sales and marketing infrastructure that
optimizes distribution channels of commodity, specialty and semi-specialty fertilizers by leveraging its commercial excellence, global
operational efficiency, region-specific knowledge, agronomic and R&D capabilities, logistical assets and customer relationships.
|
| • |
Research & Development and Innovation: We benefit from
our proximity to Israel’s global-leading high-tech and agri-tech eco-system, as well as our vast agronomy and chemistry knowledge
that we have accumulated over decades. Our extensive global R&D infrastructure includes 24 R&D and Innovation centers around the
world that employ 300 highly experienced personnel who have obtained our 945 active patents in 175 patent families. ICL's R&D unit
supports the development of new, innovative products, applications and formulations for each of our operating segments through internal
research, employee ideation and collaborative research with third parties. |
| • |
An extensive global logistics and distribution network with operations
in over 30 countries. |


| • |
Unique portfolio
of mineral assets. Access to these assets provides us with a consistent, reliable supply of raw materials,
allows for large-scale production, and supports our integrated value chain of specialty products. |
| • |
Diversification
into higher value‑added specialty products leverages our integrated business model. Our company’s
integrated production processes are based on a synergistic value chain that allows us to both efficiently convert raw materials into value
added downstream products and to use the byproducts. For example, in phosphates, we use backward integration to produce specialty phosphates
for the food industry and for industrial applications. These businesses benefit from higher growth rates, higher margins and lower volatility
compared to commodity phosphates. In addition, as a byproduct of the potash production at the Dead Sea, we generate brines with the highest
bromine concentration globally. Our bromine-based products serve various industries such as the electronics, construction, oil and gas,
and automotive industries. |
| • |
Leading positions
in markets with high barriers to entry. We enjoy leadership positions in many of the key markets
in which we operate. We are the clear leader in the Bromine market, with approximately one third of global production, as well as most
of the excess capacity in the market. In the Potash market, our Dead Sea operations have a leading competitive cost position. According
to CRU, the Dead Sea is among the most competitive potash sources to China, India and Brazil. ICL also has the largest market share in
specialty phosphates, in the combined markets of North America, Europe and Latin America, and we are the sole producer of polyhalite.
In addition, we have leadership positions in additional product lines, such as phosphorous-based flame retardants, PK fertilizers in Europe,
and soluble phosphate-based fertilizers. |
| • |
Strategically
located production and logistics assets. We benefit from the proximity of our facilities, both in
Israel and Europe, to developed economies (Western Europe) and emerging markets (such as China, India and Brazil). In Israel, we ship
from two seaports: The Port of Ashdod (with access to Europe and South America) and the Port of Eilat (with access to Asia, Africa and
Oceania). Access to these two ports provides us with two distinct advantages versus our competitors: (1) lower plant to port, ocean freight,
and transportation costs from our ports to our target markets, which lowers our overall cost structure; and (2) faster time to market,
due to our proximity to end markets, which allows us to opportunistically fill short lead time orders and strengthen our position with
our customers. We also operate manufacturing facilities in each of the markets we serve – Europe, North and South America, and Asia
Pacific, in order to serve our global customers on a regional basis. |
| • |
Strong cash generation
and closely
monitored capital allocation approach. A continuous focus on cash generation and the optimization
of capital expenditures (CAPEX) and working capital – as well as the implementation of efficiency measures – enabled us to
generate strong operating cash flow of $1,056 million in 2025. ICL's capital allocation approach balances long term value creation, through
investments in its growth, with its commitment to providing a solid dividend yield, while aiming to maintain an investment grade rating
of at least BBB- from S&P and Fitch. In 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors resolved to extend our dividend policy of a payout
ratio of up to 50% of annual adjusted net income, until further notice. In respect to 2025 adjusted net income, the Company declared total
dividends in the amount of $232 million, reflecting a dividend yield rate of approximately 3.1% (based on the average share price for
the year). See “Item 8 - Financial Information— A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.
|
| • |
Professional
expertise and culture of collaboration and determination. Our operations are managed by an international
management team with extensive industry experience. We develop leaders with strong experience in their fields and focus on nurturing and
empowering talent through a global platform of qualification, collaboration and communication, intended to drive change and innovation
within the Company. |
| 1. |
Profitable growth, with a focus on specialty crop nutrition and
specialty food solutions; |
| 2. |
Maximizing the value of our core businesses, including our phosphate,
potash and bromine resources; |
| 3. |
Overall portfolio optimization and cost efficiency. |
| 1. |
Profitable Growth |
| 2. |
Maximizing the value of our Core businesses
|
| 3. |
Portfolio Optimization and Cost Efficiency
|

|
Sub-business line
|
Product |
Primary Applications
|
Primary End‑Markets
|
|
Flame
retardants |
Bromine, phosphorus and magnesium-Based Flame
Retardants |
Plastic, building materials and textile production
|
Electronics, automotive, building, construction
and textiles |
|
Industrial
solutions |
Elemental Bromine |
Chemical reagent |
Tire manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and agro,
PTA and flame retardants |
|
Brominated and Phosphorus compounds
|
Raw materials for pharmaceuticals and agro
|
Pharmaceuticals and agro | |
|
Industrial services |
Functional fluids, Biocides (Water treatment
and disinfection), Merquel and MBr |
Power plants and other industrial facilities
| |
|
Clear Brines |
Oil and gas drillings |
Oil and gas | |
|
Energy storage |
Brominated electrolytes, Phosphorus based
active salt for electrolytes |
Battery producers | |
|
Specialty
minerals |
Magnesia Products |
Pharma and Supplementals, health care, transformer
steel, catalysts, fuel and oil additives. |
Supplementals, multivitamins, transformer
steel and health care |
|
Calcium Carbonate |
Supplementals and pharma |
Supplementals and pharma | |
|
Solid MgCl2, KCl |
Deicing, food, oil drilling, pharma
|
De-icing, sodium replacement, KCl for drugs.
Multi-vitamins, oil drilling companies, small industrial niche markets |





| • |
A relatively low average cost of potash production at the Dead
Sea, using the sun as a solar energy source in the evaporation process. |
| • |
Logistical advantages from to our strategic geographic location
and access to nearby ports in Israel and Europe, along with our relative proximity to customers, resulting in highly competitive marine
and overland shipping costs as well as expedited delivery times. |
| • |
Climate advantages, stemming from hot and dry conditions at the
Dead Sea, enable us to store substantial quantities of potash in an open area at minimal cost. This capability allows us to maintain continuous,
full-capacity production in Sodom regardless of fluctuations in global potash demand. |
| • |
Our mine in Spain is one of the few in Western Europe, creating
logistics advantages in supplying European customers. |


| • |
An integrated value chain utilizing phosphate rock mined in Israel
(at ICL Rotem), as well as in China (YPH), to produce green phosphoric acid, which primarily serves as a raw material for both the segment's
products and those of our Growing Solutions segment. |
| • |
Logistical advantages stemming from the segment's geographical
location and diversification, its proximity to ports in Israel and Europe, and its relative proximity to our customers. |
| • |
Our ability as a global fertilizer producer to combine potash
and phosphate fertilizers in the same shipment, which enables us to service smaller customers, particularly in Brazil and the US.
|
| • |
The segment enjoys a competitive advantage in specialty phosphates
deriving from product features, quality, service, technical application support, a global manufacturing footprint and a very broad product
line. |
| • |
YPH provides an integrative phosphate platform in China with
beneficial access to the Chinese market. In addition, the segment enjoys a competitive cost advantage in its phosphate activities, due
to access to low‑cost phosphate rock with long‑term reserves.
|
| • |
The segment has a diversity of integrated solutions that have
been designed specifically to match a customer’s unique needs. |
| • |
Highly qualified R&D capabilities and existing know-how that
enable the delivery of products aligned with global megatrends, such as in the Specialty Food Solutions market. |

| • |
Controlled‑release fertilizers (CRF) allow accurate release
of nutrients over time. CRFs have a special coating that allows prolonged release of nutrients from over several weeks to 18 months compared
to regular fertilizers that dissolve in the soil and are immediately available but therefore leach partially into the soil. ICL Growing
Solutions offers leading global and regional brand-name products including Osmocote, Agroblen, Agrocote, Agromaster, Polyblen and Producote.
|
| • |
Osmocote is the most widely recognized and used controlled-release
fertilizer among ornamental growers globally. The brand is known to deliver high quality ornamental plants due to its consistent nutrient
release and unique patterned and programmed release technologies. We continue to invest in innovation and field trials to validate and
demonstrate the performance and high reliability of our products. With Osmocote Exact and Osmocote 5, ICL offers advanced technologies
designed to enhance nutrient and micronutrient uptake of the plants. In addition, ICL has developed a faster biodegradable coating for
controlled-release fertilizers, marketed as eqo.s. This technology is incorporated into the Company's professional turf brands, such as
Sierrablen and ProTurf, which are mainly used on sport fields and golf courses. The eqo.s is the first market solution featuring a CRF
coating for urea that biodegrades more rapidly, and is specifically designed to comply with the upcoming EU fertilizer regulation set
to take effect in October 2028. In 2025, ICL became the first company in the EU to receive the official CE Mark for this technology, certifying
its compliance and allowing its use in the EU market. |
| • |
Soluble fertilizers, which are fully water soluble, are commonly
used for fertilization through drip irrigation systems to optimize fertilizer efficiency in the root zone to maximize yields and some
of them can also be used for foliar applications. Our well-known brands for fertigation include Peters, Universol, Solinure, Agrolution,
Nova, Fertiflow and others. Our leading brands for foliar application are Agroleaf Liquid, Agroleaf Power and Nutrivant. ICL develops
specific formulations for different applications and crops. In South America, products such as Profol, Kellus, Tonus, Translok, Forcy,
Nutritio, Vegetação and Dimi Tônico are used as high technology products for farmers to improve plant nutrition and physiology
through foliar fertilization. There are specific formulations for specific crops, greenhouses and/or open fields, as well as for different
water types. In 2025, we launched our foliar drone-spray, water-soluble fertilizer technology under the brand name FertiBuzz. |
| • |
‘Straight fertilizers’ are crystalline, free‑flowing
and high purity phosphorus and potassium soluble fertilizers such as MKP, MAP and PeKacid. Our key brands include NovaPeak, Nova PeKacid
& NovaMAP. PeKacid is a patented product of ICL. It is the only solid, highly acidifying, water-soluble fertigation product that contains
both phosphorus and potassium. The product is ideal for hard water conditions where an acidifying effect is required, as well as for keeping
dripping lines clean. |
| • |
Liquid fertilizers are used for intensive agriculture and are
integrated into irrigation systems (mainly drip systems). Our product line includes mostly tailor‑made formulations designed for
specific soil and water/climate conditions and crop needs. |
| • |
Peat is a growing medium for various crops in which generally
controlled‑release fertilizers and plant‑protection products are mixed in. Specific formulations of growing media are tailored
to meet the requirements of specific plants, including those cultivated in greenhouse bedding plants and outdoor nurseries. One of our
peats is the "Levington” brand, a well-known ICL brand. The integration of growing media products into our UK portfolio enhances
ICL’s ability to offer a holistic and efficient solution to our customers. We are dedicated to adopting more circular products and
expanding our selection of growing media offerings with Fibagro Advance, an outstanding peat alternative manufactured in the UK. This
innovative and advanced woodfibre product is being used as a key component in professional growing media mixes and provides professional
growers with sustainable growing solutions. |
| • |
Growing Media, Levington Advance is a leading brand of growing
media product line in the UK and Ireland, offering premium pre-mixed solutions tailored to the specific needs of ornamental growers. Through
our unique Fibagro Advance woodfiber technology, we offer an enhanced and sustainable alternative to peat. |
| • |
Specialty Turf Fertilizers - In addition to controlled release
fertilizers, the Company offers specialized fertilizers for a range of grass-field applications. For golf greens, the portfolio includes
very fine granular fertilizers, such as Greenmaster and Sierraform GT (slow-release fertilizers), as well as a range of Greenmaster liquids.
|
| • |
Water conservation and soil conditioning products – these
are new product lines developed by the segment to enhance water use efficiency and soil health. In professional turf, water conservation
products such as H2Flo and H2Pro are designed to retain moisture in the root zone, improving water availability and usage. This technology
is also being applied in agriculture to optimize water distribution around crop roots. For the Ornamental market, ICL offers H2Gro, which
is added to growing media to ensure consistent water availability to plants. A wide range of H2Pro products is also available for the
Professional Turf market. |
| • |
Bio-stimulants technologies, such as Triplus, Improver, Concorde,
Vegetação and Dimi Tônicoare and the general Bioz line are being successfully used by farmers to increase their productivity
and alleviate abiotic stress, such as drought, salinity, and others. |
| • |
Adjuvants are essential to enhance foliar nutrition, herbicides
and crop protection spray. We offer the South American market adjuvant technologies, including Helper, Tensor Max and AD+ as well as various
formulations that address the primary challenges facing farmers, such as drift and run off. |
| • |
Our Polysulphate® and Polysulphate®-based fertilizers,
customized to meet the needs of different crops and soil types, maximize yields and allow more precise and efficient applications.
|
| • |
Polysulphate® contributes to and follows the main market
trends in the field of increased nutrient-use efficiency, low carbon footprint and organic fertilizers.
|
| • |
PotashpluS – a compressed mixture of Polysulphate®
and potash. The product includes potassium, sulphur, calcium and magnesium. |
| • |
PKpluS – a unique combination of phosphate, potash and
Polysulphate®. The product also includes sulphur, calcium and magnesium. |
| • |
NPKpluS – a unique combination of Nitrogen, phosphate,
potash and Polysulphate®. This product includes all 6 macro nutrients in one granule. |

| • |
A strong, efficient and integrated supply chain with in-house
access to high-quality raw materials, mostly phosphate and potash, supported by a broad product portfolio and global production footprint.
|
| • |
Strong R&D and innovation capabilities, creating a strong
platform for future growth in controlled-release fertilizers, fertigation, foliar soluble fertilizers, bio-stimulants, water efficiency
and innovative, and next- generation products. |
| • |
Advanced, value-added production technologies and tailored formulations
that meet our customers’ unique needs. |
| • |
A highly skilled global agronomic sales team offering expert
support and fostering customer loyalty. |
| • |
Comprehensive, one-stop shop product portfolio. |
| • |
ICL’s well-known and leading brands. |
| • |
Direct farmer relationships (B2C) in key markets (Brazil, Israel,
and India), enabling field-level service and acceleration of the innovation cycle.
|
| • |
We continuously explore new technologies to use secondary phosphate
sources as alternatives to virgin raw materials. We are developing future resources for our fertilizer products, including for recycling
and recovery of phosphorus and nitrogen from secondary sources. |
| • |
PuraLoop® is an innovative phosphorus fertilizer produced
by us through the reaction of 100% SSA (sewage sludge ash). This pioneering fertilizer addresses the critical issue of resource conservation
in agriculture and promotes sustainable farming. |
| • |
Pearl® is a sustainably recycled phosphorus product that
helps to close the phosphorus cycle. It is recovered from high concentrations of phosphorus in diverse water streams, preventing losses
into aquatic environments while preserving finite rock phosphate resources, and is integrated into our premium controlled-release fertilizer,
Sierrablen Plus®. |
| • |
MagiK® is a powerful organic multi-nutrient for crops, used
as an additive in fertilization products. It was developed from a byproduct stream of our magnesium production process. |
| • |
Fibagro Advance is a peat-alternative growing media that uses
waste from the timber industry and a thermo-mechanical process to create a unique matrix that improves moisture and nutrient retention.
The product has a lower carbon footprint compared to peats and other peat alternatives. |
| • |
As part of our Circular Economy efforts in China, we are developing
various uses for phosphogypsum, the only byproduct from our Chinese site that has not yet been fully utilized. In addition to existing
solutions, the Company, in collaboration with local authorities, has developed a solution to rehabilitate an old mine. In 2025, we successfully
utilized 2.8 million cubic meters of phosphogypsum. |
| • |
We invest time and effort in advancing solutions for the utilization
of phosphogypsum at Rotem, in line with our Circular Economy approach to transform byproducts into valuable resources. The Company is
collaborating with a third party to establish a pilot intended to evaluate a technological pathway to convert phosphogypsum into valuable
raw materials that can be reintegrated into industrial value chains. |
| • |
At ICL Dead Sea, salt is used as internal infrastructure in the
rehabilitation of operational roads, construction of wall barriers, as well as in other infrastructure projects. |

| • |
Climate risk management is an integral part of our overall approach
to ‘Doing the Right Thing, in the Right Way, Every Day’. ICL’s Board is responsible for setting ICL’s overall
strategic direction, including sustainability, climate and ESG related matters. The Board views climate change as a material component
of the Company's strategy. |
| • |
The Board has appointed a Climate, Sustainability and Community
Relations Committee (“CSC Committee”) to oversee climate-related issues, including but not limited to, climate-change risk
assessment and mitigation plans, installation of renewable energy facilities, site decarbonization plans, implementation of Circular Economy
activities, achievement of energy and water savings targets and implementation of various policies related to environmental impact. The
CSC Committee is chaired by Dr. Miriam Haran, a leading environmental expert with substantial experience in environmental and climate-related
matters. The CSC Committee comprises three additional directors on the Board who possess significant industrial and risk management experience,
including experience regarding environmental matters. |
| • |
The CSC Committee convenes quarterly, as scheduled, unless additional
meetings are necessitated for ad hoc purposes. The meetings include review of updates regarding the Company’s latest ESG related
events, as well as changes in underlying regulations, ESG risk assessments and ESG management systems, in addition to review and approval
of policies and procedures when relevant. The CSC Committee also holds annual discussions regarding, among other things, risk mitigation
measures, climate-related risk and opportunity disclosures, the Company’s ESG reporting, and ICL’s sustainability KPI targets.
Progress made on climate-related targets, and adherence to the Company’s GHG decarbonization targets, are also monitored in these
meetings (for more information, refer to the ‘Metrics and Targets’ section below). |
| • |
In February 2023, the Board approved the submission of a declaration
to the SBTi organization, wherein the Company will commit to set a near-term, science-based target in accordance with the framework developed
by the SBTi. The Board’s approval followed discussion and approval by ICL’s Global Executive Committee (GEC) in January 2023,
and the CSC Committee in February 2023. In March 2023, SBTi officially confirmed ICL’s commitment to develop near-term targets in
accordance with SBTi criteria and processes. Following ICL’s submission in March 2025, SBTi validated ICL’s near term targets
for GHG reduction in July 2025. The CSC Committee will continue to oversee ICL’s decarbonization plan and targets. |
| • |
The Board’s Audit & Accounting Committee, as determined
in ICL’s Board Manual, is responsible for, among other responsibilities, overseeing ICL’s risk management, including monitoring
our activities to manage and mitigate identified risks, as well as to ensure our compliance with relevant regulations. Accordingly, ICL’s
Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”), which includes climate related risks, is discussed at least on a bi -annual basis, and
any material changes are updated on a regular basis. |
| • |
ICL’s ERM approach and constituting documents, including
its ERM policy and procedures, follow the risk management methodology of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Committee
(COSO). The methodology is defined as “the culture, capabilities, and practices, integrated with strategy setting and its performance,
that organizations rely on to manage risk in creating, preserving, and realizing value”. |
| • |
ICL’s Global Executive Committee (“GEC”), comprised
of its senior executive management members, meets on a weekly basis and is responsible for overseeing the Company’s actions, policies
and initiatives designed to ensure that ICL’s material ESG and climate -related risks are being appropriately addressed and managed.
It also renders decisions on various issues including sustainability, climate and ESG matters. This includes the formation of annual budgets,
deliberations regarding major capital and operational expenditures for climate mitigation activities related to low carbon production
products and services, climate -related transactions (including acquisitions, mergers and divestitures) and the implementation of the
climate transition plan. |
| • |
To assist the GEC in better monitoring and overseeing ICL’s
sustainability, climate and ESG related matters, the GEC appointed a GEC Sustainability Committee, an advisory committee which convenes
on a quarterly basis. Following an organizational change, ICL’s EVP, Chief Legal and Sustainability Officer, was appointed as Deputy
CEO, and the responsibility over sustainability was transferred to the ICL Chief Procurement & CAPEX Officer, as well as responsibility
for energy matters. Accordingly, ICL Chief Procurement & CAPEX Officer, is chairing the GEC Sustainability Committee as of 2026. In
2025, the GEC Sustainability Committee was chaired by ICL’s EVP, Chief Legal and Sustainability Officer, and included the CFO, the
EVP, Chief Risk Officer, ICL's Potash Division President, and Head of Israel Phosphate Operations, who is also in charge of ICL’s
global EHS, the Chief Procurement & CAPEX Officer, the Chief Innovation and Technology Officer and the ICL's Phosphate Specialty Solutions
Division President. Three separate management-level committees report to the GEC Sustainability Committee on climate-related risks. These
include: (i) a Physical Risk Committee and (ii) a Transition Risk Committee. A third committee, an Operational Executive Committee (OEC),
is responsible for management, including measurement, of certain operational matters, including: waste, water management, air quality
and pollution, biodiversity and EHS. All three committees are supported by ICL’s global sustainability and risk management teams,
which manage both physical and transitional climate-related matters. The purpose of these committees is to identify potential climate
related risks and opportunities, assess their impact on ICL’s operational and logistic sites, manage their financial transition,
and determine mitigation actions to minimize ICL’s exposure to risk according to the respective ICL risk appetite. The chairs of
the committees meet on a periodical basis to synchronize their activities. |

| • |
Scenario SSP1-2.6
reflects a future where physical risks, such as extreme weather events and long-term temperature increases, are minimized compared to
other higher emissions scenarios. |
| • |
Scenario SSP2-4.5
addresses moderate physical risks, such as the increased frequency and severity of heatwaves, storms, and droughts in the long run.
|
| • |
Scenario SSP5-8.5
assumes a business-as-usual trajectory with limited global mitigation efforts. It reflects severe physical risks in the long term, including
frequent extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and significant ecosystem disruptions. This scenario highlights the need for robust
resilience planning to mitigate catastrophic impacts on operations, infrastructure, and supply chains. |

|
Transition risks
|
Horizon
and potential impact |
Description
|
ICL’s
response |
|
Policy
& legal
Carbon pricing mechanisms |
Time horizons:
Short, Medium and Long
Potential impact:
Medium to high, particularly within 2050-time
horizon and ambitious transition scenarios |
Stricter
environmental regulations may impose additional compliance costs and operational constraints:
Regulatory developments in countries or jurisdictions
where we operate, exposure to carbon trading schemes, cross-border tax and adjustment mechanisms, increases in existing carbon pricing,
and carbon taxes on energy and other supplies are expected to lead to increased costs for ICL. Since carbon pricing mechanisms are still
in development in most areas globally, it is expected that the risk exposure will increase over time.
|
In recent years, we have undertaken proactive
measures to reduce our carbon footprint as part of our decarbonization roadmap that includes increasing energy efficiency and transitioning
to lower carbon energy sources. We have already achieved a 26.0% (vs 2018 base year) reduction in Scope 1-2.
Consequently, we are actively improving our
understanding of our GHG emissions' impacts and are actively striving to reduce GHG emissions throughout our value chain enabling us to
reduce our exposure to carbon pricing risks.
This year we further updated our climate risk
assessment, using the latest releases for carbon price projections, on both our direct (Scope 1 & 2) and indirect (Scope 3) emissions,
covering potential impacts from 2025 to 2050.
The Israeli carbon tax that came into effect
in 2025 was also incorporated into the models, with adjustments made to reflect the updated Israeli carbon prices.
The analysis outputs will improve our financial
preparedness and planning and foster strategic decision-making to mitigate risks linked with carbon pricing transitions. |
|
Reputation
Increased stakeholders concern regarding environmental
performance
|
Time horizons:
Medium
Potential impact:
Medium to high, in all scenarios |
ICL operates in a GHG intensive sector, there
are interests, concerns and expectations regarding operational and product -related environmental performance from investors, the public,
and governmental and non-governmental authorities, that could have an impact on our reputation (preference for our products or investor
confidence). |
ICL’s commitment to ambitious climate
targets is aligned with the Paris Agreement. Therefore, in recent years we have undertaken proactive measures to reduce our carbon footprint
and actively improved our understanding of our GHG emissions (Scope 1-2-3), coupled with developing low-carbon products and services,
raising awareness and creating the proper governance structure to support climate related risks and opportunities, as well as increasing
transparency throughout our public disclosure and reports. For more information please see: “ICL Climate Related Risk and Opportunity
Disclosures – Introduction”. |
|
Transition risks
|
Horizon
and potential impact |
Description
|
ICL’s
response |
|
Financial
Financial Climate Alignment |
Time horizons:
Short to Medium
Potential impact:
Medium |
Certain investors and lenders are increasingly
prioritizing climate-related risks considerations in their portfolios. Companies that fail to align with low-carbon objectives and with
climate-change related adaptation and mitigation efforts may face reduced access to capital or higher financing costs. This pressure is
driven by external trends in sustainable investing and internal shifts in financial institutions’ policies, which require greater
transparency and climate alignment. |
Sustainable finance plays an important role
in enabling ICL’s transition to a low-carbon and environmentally sustainable economy. Our global finance teams are integrating ESG
KPIs and GHG reduction targets into financial reporting and planning, building the data infrastructure to support decision-making and
enhancing ESG performance transparency with robust financial metrics, creating resilience for short, medium, and long-term horizons. With
this infrastructure in place, ICL is well-positioned to leverage financial opportunities to advance its sustainability agenda, as demonstrated
over the past several years. ICL has integrated sustainability targets into its financial operations, securing a €250 million sustainability-linked
loan and a $1.55 billion sustainability-linked revolving credit facility, which included targets for a reduction in absolute Scope 1 &
2 GHG emissions and additional sustainability related KPIs. For more information see Strategy – Financial Planning. |
|
Technology
Requirements for clean energy |
Time horizons:
Short to Medium
Potential impact:
Low in all scenarios |
We acknowledge that our sector relies heavily
on energy, and as global demand shifts towards greener sources of energy, there is a heightened need to invest in renewable energy procurement.
Both external policies and internal targets drive this imperative. However, transitioning to alternative energy sources may result in
increased operational costs. |
ICL recognizes the necessity of sustainable
energy practices. By entering long term renewable Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and utilizing energy attributes certificates (EACs),
we will reduce our Scope 2 emissions, mitigate energy transition risks and strengthen our portfolio to increase operational resilience.
For more information please see: “Sustainable Procurement”. |
|
Technology
The ability to Implement direct operational
reduction measures |
Time horizons:
Medium to Long
Potential
impact: High in all scenarios |
Increasing global pressures to reduce GHG
emissions highlights the necessity for companies to upgrade their infrastructure, ensuring adherence to environmental standards and energy
efficiency goals. This could result in increased costs to upgrade and improve our infrastructure, including due to energy efficiencies
and optimization of production processes, to reduce our direct Scope 1 emissions. |
ICL has already initiated a process of addressing
this risk by deploying a multi-disciplinary team of experts internally which focuses on identifying initiatives to reduce Scope 1 emissions
through, among others, energy efficiency measures at various ICL sites. In addition, following our commitment to establish science -based
emission reduction targets, we are exploring the possibility of green electricity production and storage at our primary locations, aligning
with our long-term sustainability goals. For further information, please see "Operations". |
|
Markets
Reduced demand due to chronic changes in weather
patterns |
Time
horizons: Medium to Long
Potential
impact: Medium |
An increase in the temperature and volatile
precipitation, chronic changes in regional climates which can result in shifts in the average growing season, growing conditions and crop
mix, may result in reduced demand for commodity fertilizers. |
ICL is actively monitoring market trends and
weather-related agricultural growing conditions in response to climate change, while also employing scenario-based models to assess longer
terms potential impacts. We believe our diverse products and services portfolio, which supports precision agriculture and other products
that contribute to plant resilience, will better support farmers in a changing environment. |
|
Transition opportunities
|
Horizon
and potential impact |
Description
|
ICL’s
response |
|
Markets
Increased market demand for sustainable solutions
|
Time horizon:
Medium to Long
Potential
impact: Medium to High in all scenarios due to changing climate and evolving regulations
|
We anticipate several market opportunities
arising from sustainable novel solutions and shifts in the markets driven by climate change and supported by increased demand for energy
and food security, which could lead to increased revenue. ICL’s solutions will also broaden its outlook on new low carbon markets
as well as ones that support climate adaptation and mitigation, enhancing our potential for growth and market penetration. |
As a global specialty minerals company, we
are actively exploring new market opportunities for sustainable solutions. Our downstream scenario analysis identified growth potential
in several major global markets for specialty and low-carbon fertilizers, including products that answer climate adaptation and mitigation
needs, which is driven by the impact of climate change scenarios on agricultural yields. Projections for 2030 and 2050 indicated increasing
demand due to climate change-induced shifts in agricultural needs and a need for a resilient food supply chain, with longer shelf-life
and reduced product loss and food waste. This analysis was enhanced by incorporating the assessment of climate scenarios' impact on the
transition from conventional fertilizers to specialty products. More-over, we can support the demand for electricity storage solutions
by providing raw materials to battery materials market. |
|
Products
& Services
Improved product offerings |
Time horizon:
Medium
Potential
impact: High |
We anticipate an increase in consumer demand
for products and services that support climate-change mitigation and adaptation, including specialty fertilizers, resilient food supply
chain and energy storage solutions, which is expected to propel revenue growth. |
Our products and services cater to the emerging
needs of climate-change mitigation and adaptation. ICL’s products support a resilient food supply chain, from the field to the final
consumer. Our product portfolio features among others, highly effective specialty fertilizers that facilitate optimal nutrient release,
enabling growers worldwide to reduce their fertilizer usage while simultaneously achieving higher quality crops and yields with lower
environmental impacts. ICL’s CRFs and bio-stimulants support plant nutrition and minimize N2O emission in the use phase, reducing
GHG emissions and supporting climate change mitigation. ICL's expansion in the AgroTech sector is also expected to improve farming techniques
and increase yields with lower environmental impact. ICL is involved in other parts of the food chain as well, its products contribute
to extended shelf-life, reduce fruit spoilage, and thus enable reduced food waste.
Furthermore, climate-change mitigation requires
a transition to alternative energy sources. ICL will continue to develop its existing activities related to the supply of raw materials
to the battery materials market. It remains a provider of raw materials to LFP battery customers.
In addition, ICL offers a low carbon product
footprint portfolio, for its industrial, agricultural and food products.
For further information about our sustainable
solutions, see "Strategy – Products and Services" above. |
|
Transition
opportunities |
Horizon
and potential impact |
Description
|
ICL’s
response |
|
Resource
Efficiency & Energy Source
Transition to Sustainable Energy Practices
|
Time horizon:
Medium to Long
Potential
impact: Medium to High |
Maximizing resource efficiency and transitioning
to alternative energy sources present an opportunity for ICL.
|
ICL has dedicated teams and forums that focus
on opportunities in energy efficiency. By prioritizing these initiatives, we anticipate a reduction in operational costs and our environmental
footprint as renewable energy is projected to be more cost -effective (in part due to lower carbon taxes) compared to fossil fuels. Our
strategy involves expanding our renewable and low carbon energy mix and facilitating a shift towards heightened electrification across
our operations. Furthermore, we continue our efforts to digitize and analyze site level Energy & GHG data which allows us to improve
data quality and management. This supports our journey to become more resource efficient and to reduce our footprint. Looking ahead, we
are exploring the possibility of green electricity production and storage at our primary locations, aligning with our long-term sustainability
goals. For further information about our sustainable solutions, see "Strategy – Operations" above. |
|
Resilience
Future resilience |
Time horizon:
Medium to Long
Potential
impact: Medium |
We believe that the resilience of our Company
can be increased by implementing initiatives aimed at improving our efficiency, designing innovative production processes, developing
new products and engaging in strategic procurement practices. These efforts will ensure that we maintain our competitive advantage and
continue our preparations for a low-carbon future. |
Our strategic approach to advance sustainable
practices significantly contributes to our resilience. Our research, development and innovation efforts focus on solutions that aim to
align with the UN SDGs. For more information about our sustainable solutions, see Strategy – Investment in R&D. This, in turn,
provides us with a long-term vision to pursue major market opportunities, including innovative climate-resilient solutions that enhance
business resilience. For more information about our sustainable solutions, see Strategy – Products and Services.
In addition, continued innovative practices
and improvements in production efficiency increase the resilience of our operations. For more information about our operations, see Strategy
– Operations. Integrated into our strategy is the focus of our value chain, with both supply chain and sustainable procurement being
in scope. For more information about our supply chain and sustainable procurement, see Strategy – Supply Chain and Strategy –
Sustainable Procurement.
Additionally, enhanced access to green financing
resulting from a reduced Company-wide carbon footprint and clear sustainability strategy unlocks additional resources that further bolster
our resilience. For more information, see Strategy –Finance Planning. |
|
Year
2025
(2)(3)
|
Year
2024 (3) |
Year
2023 |
Year
2018 (1) |
2025
VS 2018 |
|
Scope 1 |
Tonnes CO2e
(thousands) |
2,088 |
2,131 |
2,102 |
2,220 |
(5.9%) |
|
Scope 2
Market-based |
Tonnes CO2e
(thousands) |
89 |
65 |
186 |
720 |
(87.7%) |
|
Total scope 1+2 GHG emission |
Tonnes CO2e
(thousands) |
2,177 |
2,196 |
2,288 |
2,940 |
(26.0%) |
| (1) |
2018 is the baseline year for ICL’s legacy decarbonization
roadmap. |
| (2) |
On a “same site basis” includes only facilities operated
by ICL in 2018, 2025 Scope 1 and Scope 2 (market-based) emissions were 2,074 and 88 thousand tonnes CO2e,
respectively. |
| (3) |
Independent assurance process was performed in accordance with
the International Standard on Assurance Engagements ISAE 3000 (Revised).
|

| • |
Development of fertilizers with better nutrient-use efficiency
and reduction of emissions. |
| • |
Development of biological bio-stimulants that stimulate plant
growth and provide resilience to various stress conditions. |
| • |
Development of products that improve water use efficiency.
|
| • |
Investigating opportunities to integrate waste streams into our
production processes, fostering a closed-loop Circular Economy and developing future sources for sustainable fertilizer products.
|
| • |
Including integration of secondary source Phosphate technologies
(Circular Economy) for immediate use in our production facilities in Europe and development of future raw material sources for our fertilizer
products, including a technology road map for recycling and recovery of phosphorous and nitrogen from secondary sources to transform our
products into sustainable fertilizers. |
| • |
Continued diversification and development of a product portfolio
of meat substitutes: ICL and Plantible Foods have partnered to launch ROVITARIS® Binding Solution, a revolutionary clean label binding
solution for plant-based meat and seafood applications that may replace most chemically processed binders. |
| • |
Our Business Development unit has scouted more than 700 Food
tech start-ups to identify disruptive technologies for ICL Phosphate Specialties. We continue to seek innovation partners who transform
sustainable food systems. The Company continued to diversify and develop its product portfolio for meat substitutes: ICL Food Specialties
and DAIZ Engineering partnered to launch ROVITARIS® SprouTx™, a revolutionary textured soy protein developed with proprietary
seed germination technology, commercialized in the European market in 2025. This innovative solution effectively addresses key unmet needs
in taste, texture, and nutrition for plant-based meat and seafood alternatives. |
| • |
Our Agmatix is pioneering the future of sustainable agriculture
through advanced data and AI-driven solutions. By transforming agronomic and environmental data into actionable insights, Agmatix enhances
crop yields, promotes sustainability, and strengthens crop resilience. Its innovative technology supports global efforts to combat climate
change, drive responsible land use, and ensure food security. |
| • |
We developed a data-driven impact and evidence assessment tool
for all RD&I projects to maximize ICL’s actions on tackling climate change, advancing food security and other contributions
to human health and wellbeing. This decision-making tool is integrated into the product development process. This tool has been incorporated
into our new product development process. |
| • |
Commissioning a high efficiency gas-fired combined heat and power
(CHP) plant at our Sodom facility to supply ICL’s facilities in Israel, replacing older oil-fired power generation systems.
|
| • |
Transitioning to the procurement of renewably generated electricity
across all ICL sites, beginning with the procurement of renewable electricity for ICL sites in Europe and expanding to sites in the US,
Israel, China and Brazil. |
| • |
Secured long-term renewable energy power purchase agreements
(PPAs) to expand the share of renewables in ICL’s energy in Israel. |
| • |
Decommissioning our oil shale-based power generation at Rotem
(Israel), in favor of a more efficient gas-fired power plant with significantly lower GHG emissions. |
| • |
Recovering heat from various chemical reactions to produce zero
emission power for utilization by ICL sites. |
| • |
Improved measurement of GHG emissions, including the increase
of accessibility to site -level carbon metrics and analytics for our operational managers and management through digital dashboards for
up-to-date reporting of emissions at site and product levels. |
| • |
Eliminating or reducing process GHG emissions through changes
to chemical processes and production lines. |
| • |
Converting our remaining production facilities that utilize high
-emitting fossil fuels to energy generated from natural gas, renewable sources and waste heat. |
| • |
Increasing energy efficiency by phasing out inefficient production
technologies, streamlining our production facilities, increasing the efficiency of our consumption of heat and steam, and recovering heat
where possible. |
| • |
Reducing the use of electricity for lighting and air conditioning
by implementing more efficient technologies. |
| • |
Installing solar photovoltaic (solar PV) electricity generation
systems in all available and appropriate areas within the operational boundaries of our sites. |
| • |
Considering carbon pricing in product development, acquisitions
and capital investment decision-making to raise internal awareness, promote better life cycle operating decisions, and better prepare
our business for future emissions trading schemes. |
| • |
Securing long-term renewable energy power purchase agreements
(PPAs) to expand the share of renewables in ICL’s energy mix globally. |
| • |
Actively addressing Scope 3 emissions by engaging with suppliers,
fostering partnerships for education and emissions reduction, and optimizing logistics operations with alternative fuels, electric vehicles,
and energy-efficient shipping. |
| • |
Strengthening Circular Economy initiatives by maximizing the
use of byproducts and waste heat in production processes to enhance energy efficiency. |
| • |
DSW successfully completed the installation of the third and
final particle reduction unit (WESP). In 2025, DSM also implemented its third major particle emissions reduction unit. additional ICL
production sites in Israel are progressing with initiatives to further reduce air emissions. |
| • |
In January 2024, a new emission permit was issued to ICL Rotem
under the Israeli Clean Air Act (hereinafter - the Law) valid until January 2031. ICL Rotem is implementing several significant emissions
reduction projects as required in the permit, according to a multi-year plan. The Company is in active discussions with Israel’s
Ministry of Environmental Protection (MoEP) to assure adherence to all conditions outlined in the permit, including those specified in
an administrative order under Section 45 of the Law, and to achieve satisfactory resolutions to notable timeline execution challenges
for a limited number of projects. |
| • |
ICL Dead Sea (DSW) and ICL Dead Sea Magnesium (DSM) – Based
on a historical soil survey conducted to map potential soil contamination, the sites have prepared a borehole testing schedule that is
planned to be conducted in 2026. Once the test results are received, a mitigation plan will be implemented. |
| • |
ICL Dead Sea (DSW) - As part of its operational activities, DSW
piles salt, a byproduct of the production process, in the operational salt mound (Mount Salt) in accordance with a plan approved by the
Southern District Planning and Building Committee in September 2016, allowing a height of 40 meters. In January 2024, a supplementary
plan was approved allowing the mound to be raised by an additional 12 meters, which is expected to be utilized at least until the end
of the concession period. |
| • |
ICL Rotem – In 2024, the site completed the implementation
of a master plan for wastewater treatment, aimed primarily at reducing effluent quantities. The plan also addressed the treatment of additional
wastewater streams created by air emission purification processes, as required under the Israeli Clean Air Law. Restoration of acidic
ponds is being carried out according to a plan in compliance with the hazardous materials permit, and the process of obtaining an emissions
permit for the ponds has begun. |
| • |
Neot Hovav - Pursuant to the requirements of the MoEP, the Neot
Hovav site is required to treat remnant hazardous waste in the coming years. This waste is stored in a designated defined area on the
site's premises in coordination with the MoEP. Some of the currently produced waste is also stored in this area. Treatment of the waste
is partially conducted through a combustion facility (Bromine Recovery Unit), which recovers hydro-bromine acid. Additional waste quantities
are sent to external designated treatment facilities. Once the area is cleared, the Company may be required to conduct a soil survey.
For further information, see Note 17 to our Audited Financial Statements. |
| • |
ICL Haifa (F&C) – The phosphoric acid production line
from the 1990’s, which has since been shut down, resulted in a byproduct in the form of a phosphogypsum pile, which is currently
stored on site. The Company is taking the necessary actions, in coordination with the MoEP, to comply with regulatory requirements in
a timely manner, including as stipulated in the Toxins Permit issued to the site. |
| • |
ICL Iberia - A multi-year program is underway to restore large
salt piles, with focus on wastewater drainage and sludge treatment. In April 2021, the Company signed an agreement with the Catalan Water
Agency (ACA), for the construction and operation of new collector infrastructure. The new collector is essential to remove brine water,
which will be used for both restoration and production. For further information, see Notes 17 and 18 to our Audited Financial Statements.
|
| • |
ICL Boulby - All wastewater leaving our site in the UK is according
to a permit issued by the UK’s Environment Agency. The site's wastewater consists of extracted sea water, mine brines, gathered
surface rainwater and water treated at the onsite sewage plant. Multiple parameter limits are imposed on the site by the wastewater permit
and wastewater amounts have been reduced considerably since ICL Boulby started to exclusively produce Polysulphate and Polysulphate-based
products. |
| • |
ICL US Gallipolis Ferry - In January 2023, the site entered into
a Consent Order with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (hereinafter - WV DEP) regarding water discharge, allowing
for the development and execution of a plan to meet permit requirements. In 2025, further reviews identified inaccuracies in the previously
used sampling methodology, which were subsequently addressed with the WV DEP. As a result, the Consent Order was closed and resolved with
the WV DEP. |
| • |
ICL DSW – Due to a negative water balance, water levels
in the northern basin of the Dead Sea are decreasing. Over the years, this decline has required ICL to relocate its pumping station northwards
to allow continued operations in the Dead Sea region. This relocation also supports the continued operation of tourism infrastructure.
The P-9 pumping station and the feeder canal, which cross the Tze’elim stream, were constructed to maintain operational continuity.
The Tze’elim stream alluvial fan is one of the largest and most developed among the surviving fans in the area, making its preservation
and the protection of the biodiversity in this habitat particularly important. ICL reached an agreement with environmental authorities
and organizations, under which seven culverts were constructed above the excavated canal to allow flood waters to flow through the original
channel without damaging the feeder canal, while preserving the braided channel fan pattern. The culverts serve as an ecological corridor,
providing passageways for animals. The Company periodically reviews field data and makes adjustments based on the findings. |
| • |
ICL Iberia - Past activities at ICL Iberia have led to the salinization
of certain water wells in the Suria and Sallent sites, resulting in compensation claims from nearby landowners. |
| • |
ICL Rotem – In 2020, an application for a class action
was filed against the Company according to which, discharge, leakage, and seepage of wastewater from Rotem’s Zin site allegedly
resulted in various environmental hazards and damage to the Zin stream. In November 2022, the parties signed a procedural arrangement
to resort to a mediation process in an attempt to settle the dispute outside of court. As part of the procedural arrangement, the transfer
of approximately 5.5 million NIS from the Company to NPA was approved to fund the NPA’s palm trees rescue operations at Neot Zin
and Akrabim for the years 2022-2026. For further information, see Note 18 to our Audited Financial Statements. |
| • |
ICL R&D Beer Sheva - A soil survey was performed and identified
soil contamination. ICL is addressing the findings in accordance with the survey results and the applicable Ministry of Environmental
Protection (MoEP) guidelines. |
| • |
Brazil - Following soil and groundwater surveys conducted at
our Brazilian sites, we identified certain immaterial historical soil and groundwater contamination. In response, ICL is undertaking remediation
measures where required and, in certain cases, continues monitoring activities in close coordination with local governmental environmental
authorities and regulators. |
| • |
ICL DSW - Sodom Saltmarsh Lake. The Ashalim reservoir, located
south of ICL’s Dead Sea site, is a unique wetland habitat within an arid environment, rich in biodiversity. Created as a result
of ICL Dead Sea’s activities, this habitat is preserved and made accessible to the public through ongoing investment. Historically,
the Sodom salt flats area was a resting stop and habitat for migrating birds. However, due to changes in the land use for agriculture,
residential, and industrial purposes, most of these salt flats have disappeared. These rare habitats, characterized by high soil salinity
and specialized species, have been increasingly replaced by areas like the Sodom Saltmarsh Lake. The lake now functions as an alternative
salt flat, maintaining relatively high-water quality in recent years, which ICL continues to monitor. Vegetation has evolved, and the
lake now supports a range of wildlife, serving both as a nesting site and a stopover for migratory birds. Infrastructure around the lake
has also been improved to provide safe public access. |
| • |
ICL Rotem - Over the last 9 years, ICL Rotem has partnered with
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev on academic research focused on evaluating the ecological and biodiversity impacts of mine reclamation.
The study examines parameters such as soil chemistry, microbiology, vegetation growth and diversity, arthropod populations, and remote
sensing analysis of the land. Based on early findings and as part of the rehabilitation process, we are creating micro-topography to diversify
the landscape. During 2025, only laboratory soil tests were conducted, and land plots were allocated for continued research. Funding for
the limited ongoing research was provided by the Open Spaces Fund. |
| • |
ICL Boulby - Adjacent to ICL Boulby’s mining facilities,
within its operational area, are undeveloped turfs that support important habitats and species. Most notable are the woodlands at Mines
Wood and Ridge Lane Wood near Dalehouse, considered among the most wildlife-rich woodlands in Northeast England and Yorkshire. These areas
are home to diverse invertebrates, birds, and mammals. For over a decade, ICL Boulby has collaborated with Industry Nature Conservation
Association (INCA) to monitor and manage wildlife in proximity to the mine. Central to this effort is a Site Biodiversity Action Plan
(Site BAP), implemented by ICL Boulby within its operational area to conserve key habitats and species, with annual support from INCA.
For further information, see “Item 4 – Information on the Company — D. Property, Plant and Equipment — Mineral
Extraction and Mining Operations”. |
| • |
ABISOLOS: Brazilian Association of Plant Nutrition Technology
Industries. The association focuses on defending the interests of foliar and specialty fertilizers industries. It recently expanded its
scope to also operate with adjuvants and biological inputs. |
| • |
ANPII BIO: National association of inoculant producers and importers.
It was created to work with the inoculants industry. It recently expanded its scope to the bioinputs segments, including Biocontrol.
|
| • |
ABIAM: Brazilian Association of Industry and Commerce of Food
Ingredients and Additives. The association focused on defending the interests of the additives industry for use in human food. |
| • |
The European Commission’s Ecodesign E-Display regulation,
which has been in force since March 2021, bans the use of halogenated flame in electronic display enclosures. We are closely monitoring
future developments and proactively engaged in innovative chemical design, informative chemical selection tools and end of life solutions
to respond to these challenges. |
| • |
Borate salts and boric acid – Some of our products changed
their classification (SDS, labeling) due to the reproductive classification of the concentration limit. The industry has already expressed
a requirement to re-formulate to exclude these salts and ICL is working on respective solutions and replacements. |
| • |
The flame retardant tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA or TBBA) has
completed the REACH review process. As a result, TBBPA has been classified as a Category 1B carcinogen, designated as a Substance of Very
High Concern (SVHC), and included in Annex XVII of REACH, listing substances subject to restrictions. However, the “reactive”
use of TBBPA in printed circuit boards (PCBs) is not within the scope of the restriction, and TBBPA for those uses may still be placed
on the market. |
| • |
Fyrol PCF (TCPP): Denmark has submitted a proposal to ECHA to
classify TCPP as a substance with carcinogenic, reproductive toxicity, and endocrine-disrupting effects at the highest category. TCPP
is expected to be designated as a Substance of Very High Concern (SVHC). If listed, new restrictions would apply to consumer applications.
However, for key uses such as insulation and flexible foam for furniture, industry consortia have calculated substantial safety margins
for TCPP exposures to prepare for the SVHC listing and potential subsequent restriction discussions. |
| • |
Triphenyl Phosphate (TPhP): Triphenyl Phosphate (TPhP) was added
to the SVHC list on November 7, 2024, due to endocrine-disrupting properties in the environment. This is expected to be classified according
to the CLP regulations, either authorizing or restricting the substance. Many PFRs and PISs contain TPhP as a by-product formed during
production. While some products with high TPhP levels may face restrictions, we have solutions for certain PFRs and PISs and are actively
working on solutions for others. The US EPA is expected to conclude its risk evaluation for TPP in 2026, but it remains unclear whether
any use restrictions will be imposed. In Canada, the risk assessment dossier for TPP has been reopened as a follow-up to EU regulatory
developments. Currently, Canada imposes no restrictions on TPP uses. |
| • |
Decabromodiphenyl Ethane (DBDPE) is scheduled for evaluation
under expected EU restrictions, with the process anticipated to be finalized by December 2026. Articles in scope include electrical and
electronic equipment, construction and building materials, and textile articles, with restrictions planned for implementation in 2030,
followed by an 18-month transition period. In Canada, regulation of DBDPE will begin on July 30, 2026, restricting its importation and
manufacturing. Exemptions for other manufactured products (“Manufactured Items”) containing DBDPE end on December 31, 2040,
and exemptions for replacement parts for land-based motor vehicles end on December 31, 2055. In Australia, DBDPE was added to Schedule
6 (Relevant Industrial Chemicals Likely to Cause Serious or Irreversible Harm to the Environment) in June 2025, with regulations taking
effect January 1, 2027. A ban on products containing DBDPE is scheduled for 2037, and the exemption for replacement parts ends in 2052.
|
| • |
Modification of the harmonized classification and labelling
process (legally binding classifications) to prioritize new hazard classes, carry out classifications for groups of substances, increase
the number of dossiers and automatically recognize the classification of substances determined in other regulatory frameworks such as
REACH. |
| • |
CLP new classifications: Endocrine Disruptors (ED for human health
or for the environment), Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) & Persistent, Mobile & Toxic (PMT) that will be used to classify
chemicals and introduced in SDSs and on labels. |
| • |
New classification criteria for substances with more than one
constituent, for which the classification criteria of mixtures for certain hazards will be applied, based on the information of their
constituents. |
| • |
Inclusion of new rules in relation to notifications to the
public inventory of classification and labelling. |
| • |
Widespread use of drop-down labels. |
| • |
Specifying formatting requirements for labels with
respect to text font size, line spacing, and background color. |
| • |
Regulation of the use of digital labelling, although
not as an alternative to physical labelling. |
| • |
Expansion of the information to be included in online advertising
and sales. |
| • |
Determination of deadlines for updating labels due
to modifications in classification or other information. |
| • |
Clarification of the responsibility of distributors in the notification
of toxicological data sheets to poison centers. |
| • |
The FDA and Congress are pursuing reforms to the “self-affirmed
GRAS” loophole, which currently allows companies to determine an ingredient’s safety without formal FDA review or notification.
As part of its October 2025 guidance agenda, the FDA proposed a rule requiring the submission of all GRAS notices. In parallel, legislation
such as the “Better Food Disclosure Act of 2025” has been introduced to strengthen oversight and mandate public listing of
all GRAS substances. |
| • |
Like the EU, the US is implementing an Endocrine Disruptor Screening
Program (EDSP) with near-term strategies for rollout. Drawing on ICL’s experience in the EU, preparation of appropriate data will
be ensured. In 2025, the EPA finalized a settlement related to its EDSP, which includes a new tracking website for high-priority conventional
pesticides and commitments to assess their potential effects on human health. Additional developments include the EPA’s new TSCA
chemical reporting rule, effective January 13, 2025, requiring reporting of byproducts and impurities to inform risk evaluations. The
EPA is also integrating new scientific methods into the EDSP to screen chemicals more efficiently. |
| • |
In 2025, key changes to California Proposition 65 regulations
include updated short-form warnings that must now name at least one specific chemical, new options for signal words, and specific requirements
for warnings on motor vehicle and marine vessel parts. Businesses must identify chemicals in their products to ensure compliance with
a three-year transition period for products manufactured before January 1, 2028. |
| • |
Furthermore, we expect numerous anticipated rulemakings for PBTs
and NANO materials, which we will incorporate into our respective strategies. |

| • |
Israel: under the Israeli Dead Sea Concession Law, 1961, as amended
in 1986 (the “Concession Law”), we have lease rights until March 31, 2030, for salt and carnallite ponds, pumping facilities
and productions plants at Sodom. We have other production facilities in Israel, situated on land with a long-term lease, including the
Oron and Zin plants at Mishor Rotem of the Phosphate Solutions segment (the Zin and Oron plant lease agreements expired in 2024 and 2017,
respectively. The Zin lease is currently under renewal process with the Israel Land Authority, while the Oron lease has been approved
for renewal until 2044 and is in a process of formalizing a new lease agreement), production facilities at Neot Hovav of Industrial Products
segment (leased until 2027-2073), as well as production, storage and transportation facilities together with chemicals and research laboratories
at Kiryat Ata that belong to the Growing Solutions segment (leased until 2046-2049). We also use warehouses, loading and unloading sites
at Ashdod and Eilat ports (leased until 2030). |
| • |
Europe: |
| • |
North and South America: |
| • |
Asia: |
| • |
Australia: ICL’s leased facility in Heatherton, Australia,
is a manufacturing site dedicated to blending food phosphate products. |
|
Property Type
|
Location
|
Size
(square feet) |
Products
|
Owned/Leased
|
|
Plant |
Mishor Rotem, Israel |
27,094,510 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Mishor Rotem, Israel |
10,763,910 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Mishor Rotem, Israel |
430,355 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Neot Hovav, Israel |
9,601,591 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Zin, Israel |
8,484,123 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land (on a lease extension
process) |
|
Plant |
Kiryat Ata, Israel |
6,888,903 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Oron, Israel |
4,413,348 (not including phosphate reserve)
|
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land (on a lease extension
process) |
|
Evaportation ponds |
Sodom, Israel |
1,603,823 |
Salt and carnallite ponds for the Potash segment
|
Lease rights |
|
Plant |
Sodom, Israel |
13,099,679 |
Potash products (not including ponds and Magnesium
plant) |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Sodom, Israel |
4,088,800 |
Magnesium products (Potash segment)
|
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Sodom, Israel |
2,326,060 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Conveyor belt |
Sodom, Israel |
1,970,333 |
Transportation facility for Potash |
Owned on leased land |
|
Pumping stations |
Sodom, Israel |
1,180,496 |
Pumping station for the Potash segment
|
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Sodom, Israel |
667,362 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Feeding canal |
Sodom, Israel |
5,974,980 |
Part of the pumping system for the Potash
segment |
Owned on leased land |
|
Power plant |
Sodom, Israel |
645,856 |
Power and steam production for the Potash
segment |
Owned on leased land |
|
Warehouse and loading facility |
Ashdod, Israel |
664,133 |
Warehouse for Potash and Phosphate Solutions
products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Headquarters |
Beer Sheva, Israel |
193,750 |
Company headquarters |
Leased |
|
Warehouse and loading facility |
Eilat, Israel |
152,557 |
Warehouse for Potash and Phosphate Solutions'
products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Headquarters |
Tel Aviv, Israel |
22,604 |
Company headquarters |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Catalonia, Spain |
48,491,416 |
Mines, manufacturing facilities and warehouses
for Potash segment |
Owned |
|
Port/warehouse |
Catalonia, Spain |
866,407 |
Potash and salt products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Plant |
Totana, Spain |
2,210,261 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Cartagena, Spain |
209,853 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Warehouse and loading facility |
Cartagena, Spain |
184,342 |
Storage for Growing Solutions products
|
Leased |
|
Plant |
Grobbendonk, Belgium |
128,693 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Calais, France |
546,290 |
Industrial Products' products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Terneuzen, the Netherlands |
1,206,527 |
Industrial Products' products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Heerlen, the Netherlands |
481,802 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned and leased |
|
Plant |
Amsterdam, the Netherlands |
349,827 |
Growing Solutions products and logistics center
|
Owned on leased land |
|
Headquarters |
Amsterdam, the Netherlands |
59,055 |
Company headquarters in Europe |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Ludwigshafen, Germany |
2,534,319 |
Growing solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Ladenburg, Germany |
1,569,764 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Bitterfeld, Germany |
514,031 |
Industrial Products' products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Shandong, China |
692,045 |
Industrial Products products |
Owned on leased land |
|
Headquarters |
Shanghai, China |
7,830 |
Company headquarters |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Kunming, Yunnan, China |
1,161,593 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned land |
|
Plant |
Kunming, Yunnan, China |
9,607,270 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Leased land |
|
Pumping station |
Kunming, Yunnan, China |
36,931 |
A pumping station for Phosphate Solutions
|
Owned land |
|
Plant |
Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, China
|
50,342 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Peat Moor |
Nutberry and Douglas Water, United Kingdom
|
17,760,451 |
Peat mine (Growing Solutions segment)
|
Owned |
|
Plant |
Cleveland, United Kingdom |
13,239,609 |
Polysulphate products (Growing Solutions segment)
|
Owned |
|
Warehouse and loading facility |
Cleveland, United Kingdom |
2,357,296 |
Polysulphate products (Growing Solutions segment)
|
Owned on leased land |
|
Peat Moor |
Creca, United Kingdom |
4,305,564 |
Peat mine (Growing Solutions segment)
|
Owned |
|
Plant |
Nutberry, United Kingdom |
322,917 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Daventry, United Kingdom |
81,539 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned and leased |
|
Plant & warehouse |
Lawford Heath, Rugby |
45,000 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Gallipolis Ferry, West Virginia, United States
|
1,742,400 |
Industrial Products' products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Lawrence, Kansas, United States |
179,689 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Carondelet, Missouri, United States
|
190,095 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
North Charleston, South Carolina, United States
|
100,000 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Fresno, California, United States |
92,000 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Headquarters |
St. Louis, Missouri, United States
|
35,217 |
US Company headquarters |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Adel, Georgia, United States |
45,000 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Cajati, Brazil |
413,959 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil |
Phosphate plant: 137,573 Blending plant: 80,729
|
Phosphate Solutions products |
Owned on leased land (free of charge)
|
|
Plant |
Brazil Cidade Ocidental |
8,275 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Cruz Alta |
7,499 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Jacarei I |
879,248 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Jacarei II |
967,987 |
Growing Solutions products |
Leased |
|
Plant |
Brazil Maua |
968,751 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Suzano I |
3,349,186 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Suzano II |
637,001 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
City of Cascavel, State of Parana - Brazil
|
2,111 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Brazil Uberlandia |
263,716 |
Growing Solutions products |
Owned |
|
Plant |
Heatherton, Australia |
64,583 |
Phosphate Solutions products |
Leased |

| • |
Rotem Amfert Negev Limited (“ICL Rotem”) is a wholly
owned subsidiary that operates three sites, Rotem, Oron and Zin. ICL Rotem has been mining phosphates in the Negev in Israel for more
than sixty years. Mining is conducted in accordance with a phosphate mining concession that covers an area of 177.8 sqkm, and which is
in effect until December 31, 2044. The concession was granted by Israel’s Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure, under the country’s
Mines Ordinance, in conjunction with mining authorizations, which are subject to the Israel Lands Authority jurisdiction. The concession
relates to quarries (phosphate rock), whereas the authorizations cover the use of land as active mining areas. The Rotem operation is
in the production stage. |
| • |
Dead Sea Works Ltd. (“ICL Dead Sea”) is a wholly
owned subsidiary that operates the Dead Sea concession which covers 652 sqkm, and which is in effect until March 31, 2030. DSW has 37
evaporation ponds for production of potash, as well as other chemical products, located on the southwest shore of the Dead Sea’s
southern basin in Israel. DSW is in the production stage. |
| • |
ICL Iberia (“ICL Iberia”) is a wholly owned subsidiary
and holds mining rights granted by the Spanish government for two underground potash mines, Cabanasses and Vilafruns, located in Catalonia
in northeast Spain. ICL Iberia owns the land on which these surface facilities are located. The Cabanasses mine is operating and has been
in production for more than fifty years, while Vilafruns was placed on care and maintenance status in June 2020 following its discontinuation.
ICL Iberia holds 126 licenses for the extraction of rock salt and potash covering 693 sqkm. Some of these licenses are valid until 2037,
while the remainder are effective through 2067. Cabanasses is in the production stage. |
| • |
Cleveland Potash Limited (“ICL Boulby”) is a wholly
owned subsidiary that operates an underground polyhalite mine, Boulby, located in the UK. ICL Boulby owns the freehold of approximately
2.41 sqkm of the mineral field, in addition to 24 onshore and 2 offshore mineral leases which cover a total area of 809.52 sqkm. Boulby
is in the production stage. |
| • |
Yunnan Phosphate Haikou (“YPH”) equally owned by
ICL and Yunnan Yuntianhua Corporation Ltd. ("YYTH"), and controlled by ICL, owns and operates the Haikou Phosphate Mine and processing
facilities in the Xishan district of China. YPH holds a phosphate mining license for the Haikou site covering 9.6 sqkm, which the Company
operates and is valid until January 2043. Haikou is in the production stage. |
|
Israel
|
Out
of Israel |
Total
| |
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
$ millions
| ||
|
2025 |
67 |
8 |
75 |
|
2024 |
82 |
9 |
91 |
|
2023 |
170 |
10 |
180 |
|
Production
Data for ICL Boulby | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Polyhalite hoisted (kt) |
751
|
719 |
1,028 |
|
Total Polyhalite Production (kt) |
761
|
721 |
1,009 |
|
Potash
Production at Súria Plant, ICL Iberia | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Ore hoisted from Cabanasses mine (kt)
|
3,449
|
3,247 |
2,795 |
|
Head Grade % KCl |
26.0%
|
26.7% |
24.3% |
|
KCl Produced (kt) |
805
|
802 |
601 |
|
Product Grade % KCl |
95.0%
|
95.5% |
95.5% |
|
Total
Mine Production of Raw Ore at ICL Rotem | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Tonnes mined (kt) |
3,654
|
5,808 |
5,770 |
|
Grade (%P2O5 before / after beneficiation)
|
23%
/ 31% |
23% / 31% |
25% / 32% |
|
Product
Produced After Processing at ICL Rotem (kt) | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Phosphate Rock* |
2,211
|
2,375 |
2,309 |
|
Green Phosphoric Acid |
513
|
503 |
520 |
|
Fertilizers |
1,017
|
1,024 |
1,033 |
|
White Phosphoric Acid |
167
|
154 |
150 |
|
Specialty Fertilizers |
95
|
100 |
78 |
|
DSW
Production (kt) | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Potash |
3,572
|
3,700 |
3,819 |
|
Compacting plant* |
1,743
|
1,764 |
1,737 |
|
Bromine |
156
|
190 |
143 |
|
Cast Mg |
18
|
17 |
17 |
|
Total
Mine Production of Raw Ore at YPH | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Tonnes mined (kt) |
3,499
|
3,575 |
3,646 |
|
Grade (% P2O5 before/after beneficiation)
|
21%
/ 29% |
21% / 28% |
22% / 28% |
|
Product
Produced After Processing at YPH (kt) | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Phosphate Rock * |
2,455
|
2,715 |
2,657 |
|
Green Phosphoric Acid |
700
|
694 |
682 |
|
Fertilizers |
639
|
605 |
609 |
|
White Phosphoric Acid |
133
|
124 |
95 |
|
Specialty Fertilizers |
175
|
152 |
113 |
|
Measured
Mineral Resources |
Indicated
Mineral Resources |
Measured
+ Indicated Mineral Resources |
Inferred
Mineral Resources | |||||||||||||
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grades
|
Contained
Mineral (Mt) |
Contained
Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grades
|
Contained
Mineral (Mt) |
Contained
Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grades
|
Contained
Mineral (Mt) |
Contained
Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grades
|
Contained
Mineral (Mt) |
Contained
Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) | |
|
Commodity: K2O |
||||||||||||||||
|
United Kingdom |
- |
- |
- |
- |
45.8 |
13.7% |
6.3 |
6.3 |
45.8 |
13.7% |
6.3 |
6.3 |
20.8 |
13.9% |
2.9 |
2.9 |
|
Boulby |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
45.8
|
13.7%
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
45.8
|
13.7%
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
20.8
|
13.9%
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
|
Total |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
45.8
|
13.7%
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
45.8
|
13.7%
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
20.8
|
13.9%
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
|
Commodity: KCl |
||||||||||||||||
|
Spain |
113.5 |
26.2% |
29.7 |
29.7 |
76.8 |
25.6% |
19.7 |
19.7 |
190.3 |
25.9% |
49.4 |
49.4 |
271.9 |
27.6% |
75.0 |
75.0 |
|
Cabanasses |
100.9 |
25.6% |
25.8 |
25.8 |
67.4 |
24.7% |
16.6 |
16.6 |
168.3 |
25.2% |
42.5 |
42.5 |
241.2 |
27.4% |
66.1 |
66.1 |
|
Vilafruns |
12.6 |
31.0% |
3.9 |
3.9 |
9.4 |
32.1% |
3.0 |
3.0 |
22.0 |
31.5% |
6.9 |
6.9 |
30.7 |
28.9% |
8.9 |
8.9 |
|
- |
||||||||||||||||
|
Israel |
294.4 |
20.7% |
60.9 |
60.9 |
1,642.1 |
21.1% |
346.5 |
346.5 |
1,936.5 |
21.0% |
407.4 |
407.4 |
462.4 |
21.2% |
98.0 |
98.0 |
|
DSW |
294.4
|
20.7%
|
60.9
|
60.9
|
1,642.1
|
21.1%
|
346.5
|
346.5
|
1,936.5
|
21.0%
|
407.4
|
407.4
|
462.4
|
21.2%
|
98.0
|
98.0
|
|
Total |
407.9
|
22.2%
|
90.7
|
90.7
|
1,718.9
|
21.3%
|
366.1
|
366.1
|
2,126.8
|
21.4%
|
456.8
|
456.8
|
734.3
|
23.6%
|
173.0
|
173.0
|
|
Commodity: P2O5 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Israel |
168.0 |
26.5% |
44.6 |
44.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
168.0 |
26.5% |
44.6 |
44.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Rotem |
78.0 |
28.7% |
22.4 |
22.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
78.0 |
28.7% |
22.4 |
22.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Zin |
46.1 |
25.3% |
11.7 |
11.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
46.1 |
25.3% |
11.7 |
11.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Oron |
43.9 |
24.0% |
10.5 |
10.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
43.9 |
24.0% |
10.5 |
10.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
China |
3.0 |
22.3% |
0.7 |
0.3 |
2.3 |
24.0% |
0.6 |
0.3 |
5.3 |
23.0% |
1.2 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
20.0% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Haikou |
3.0
|
22.3%
|
0.7
|
0.3
|
2.3
|
24.0%
|
0.6
|
0.3
|
5.3
|
23.0%
|
1.2
|
0.6
|
0.2
|
20.0%
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
Total |
171.0
|
26.5%
|
45.3
|
44.9
|
2.3
|
24.0%
|
0.6
|
0.3
|
173.3
|
26.5%
|
45.8
|
45.2
|
0.2
|
20.0%
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Resources for Boulby,
Cabanasses, Vilafruns, Rotem, Oron, Zin and Haikou is in-situ. The point of reference for Mineral Resources for DSW is contained within
the carnallite ponds following pumping from the northern Dead Sea basin. Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
| (3) |
Mineral Resources for Boulby, Cabanasses, Vilafruns, Rotem, Oron,
Zin and DSW are reported on a 100% basis. For the Haikou mine, YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. The reported tonnages
and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5
attributable to ICL reflects the Company’s 50% interest. YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns a
50% minority interest in YPH. |
| (4) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (5) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using: |
| a. |
Boulby - a three-year average product price of $204/t FOB.
|
| b. |
Cabanasses and Vilafruns - a medium-long term potash price of
$373/t FOB. |
| c. |
DSW - a medium-long term potash price of $320/t FOB. |
| d. |
Rotem, Oron and Zin - an average of the previous three years’
prices of $1,177/t FOB for acid products and $441/t FOB for fertilizer products. |
| e. |
Haikou - an average of the previous three years’ prices
of $675/t FOB for acid products and $459/t FOB for fertilizer products. |
|
Proven
Reserves |
Probable
Reserves |
Total
Reserves | ||||||||||
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grades
|
Contained
Mineral (Mt) |
Contained
Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grades
|
Contained
Mineral (Mt) |
Contained
Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Grades
|
Contained
Mineral (Mt) |
Contained
Mineral Attributable to ICL (Mt) | |
|
Commodity: K2O |
||||||||||||
|
United Kingdom |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8.6 |
13.9% |
1.2 |
1.2 |
8.6 |
13.9% |
1.2 |
1.2 |
|
ICL Boulby |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8.6
|
13.9%
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
8.6
|
13.9%
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
|
Total |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8.6
|
13.9%
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
8.6
|
13.9%
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
|
Commodity: KCl |
||||||||||||
|
Spain |
38.5 |
24.5% |
9.4 |
9.4 |
55.0 |
25.8% |
14.2 |
14.2 |
93.5 |
25.3% |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
Cabanasses |
38.5 |
24.5% |
9.4 |
9.4 |
55.0 |
25.8% |
14.2 |
14.2 |
93.5 |
25.3% |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
Vilafruns |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Israel |
97.7 |
20.5% |
20.0 |
20.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
97.7 |
20.5% |
20.0 |
20.0 |
|
DSW |
97.7
|
20.5%
|
20.0
|
20.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
97.7
|
20.5%
|
20.0
|
20.0
|
|
Total |
136.2
|
21.6%
|
29.5
|
29.5
|
55.0
|
25.8%
|
14.2
|
14.2
|
191.2
|
22.8%
|
43.7
|
43.7
|
|
Commodity: P2O5 |
||||||||||||
|
Israel |
74.4 |
24.9% |
18.5 |
18.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
74.4 |
24.9% |
18.5 |
18.5 |
|
Rotem |
12.5 |
29.5% |
3.7 |
3.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12.5 |
29.5% |
3.7 |
3.7 |
|
Zin |
3.0 |
26.0% |
0.8 |
0.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3.0 |
26.0% |
0.8 |
0.8 |
|
Oron |
58.9 |
23.9% |
14.1 |
14.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
58.9 |
23.9% |
14.1 |
14.1 |
|
China |
40.5 |
21.6% |
8.7 |
4.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
40.5 |
21.6% |
8.7 |
4.4 |
|
Haikou |
40.5
|
21.6%
|
8.7
|
4.4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
40.5
|
21.6%
|
8.7
|
4.4
|
|
Total |
114.9
|
23.8%
|
27.3
|
22.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
114.9
|
23.8%
|
27.3
|
22.9
|
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
The point of reference for Mineral Reserves for Boulby, Cabanasses
and DSW is defined as the point where ore is delivered to the processing plants. The point of reference for Mineral Reserves for Rotem,
Oron and Haikou is defined as the point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants. The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves
for Zin is defined as the point where ore is delivered to the mobile crusher. |
| (3) |
Mineral Reserves for Boulby, Cabanasses, Vilafruns, Rotem, Oron
and Zin are reported on a 100% basis. For Haikou, YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. The reported tonnages and grades are
on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5
attributable to ICL reflects the Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns
a 50% minority interest in YPH. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using: |
| a. |
Boulby - a three-year average product price of $204/t FOB.
|
| b. |
Cabanasses and Vilafruns - a medium-long term potash price of
$350/t FOB. |
| c. |
DSW - a three-year average product price of $296/t FOB.
|
| d. |
Rotem and Oron - an average of the previous three years’
prices of $1,177/t FOB for acid products and $441 /t FOB for fertilizer products. |
| e. |
Zin – a three-year average product price of $112/t FOB
for crushed phosphate rock. |
| f. |
Haikou - an average of the previous three years’ prices
of $675/t FOB for acid products and $459/t FOB for fertilizer products. |

|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
Polyhalite hoisted (kt) |
751
|
719 |
1,028 |
|
Total Polyhalite Production (kt) |
761
|
721 |
1,009 |
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/Qualities
(K2O) |
Cut-off
grades (K2O) |
Metallurgical
recovery (K2O) |
|
Measured mineral resources |
- |
- |
12% |
100% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
45.8
|
13.7% |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral
resources |
45.8
|
13.7% |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
20.8 |
13.9% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Boulby and reviewed and
accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Resources is in-situ.
Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Boulby.
|
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a regression equation derived
from elemental analysis and density measurements. An average dry density of 2.74 g/cm3 has been estimated for the reported Mineral Resources.
|
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a three-year average product
price of $204/t FOB, which includes a range of products, and an exchange rate of £0.78 per dollar. |
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/Qualities
(K2O) |
Cut-off
grades (K2O) |
Metallurgical
recovery (K2O) |
|
Proven mineral reserves |
- |
- |
12% |
100% |
|
Probable mineral reserves |
8.6
|
13.9% |
||
|
Total mineral reserves
|
8.6
|
13.9% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Boulby and reviewed and
accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at
the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Boulby. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding |
| (6) |
A minimum mining height of 5m was used. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a three-year average product
price of $204/t FOB, which includes a range of products, and an exchange rate of £0.78 per dollar. |

|
Potash
Production at Súria Plant, ICL Iberia | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Ore hoisted from Cabanasses mine (kt)
|
3,449
|
3,247 |
2,795 |
|
Head Grade % KCl |
26.0%
|
26.7% |
24.3% |
|
KCl Produced (kt) |
805
|
802 |
601 |
|
Product Grade % KCl |
95.0%
|
95.5% |
95.5% |
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities
(KCl) |
Cut-off
grades (KCI) |
Metallurgical
recovery (KCI) |
|
Measured mineral resources |
100.9 |
25.6% |
10% |
86.5% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
67.4
|
24.7% |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral
resources |
168.3
|
25.2% |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
241.2 |
27.4% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and
accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for Mineral Resources is in-situ. Mineral
Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia.
|
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density
of 2.1 t/m3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash
price of $373/t FOB and an exchange rate of €0.88 per US dollar. |
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities
(KCl) |
Cut-off
grades (KCI) |
Metallurgical
recovery (KCI) |
|
Measured mineral resources |
12.6 |
31.0% |
10% |
86.5% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
9.4
|
32.1% |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral
resources |
22.0
|
31.5% |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
30.7 |
28.9% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and
accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
Mineral Resources are reported in-situ and are exclusive of Mineral
Reserves. |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia.
|
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average dry density
of 2.1 t/m3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash
price of $373/t FOB and an exchange rate of €0.88 per US dollar. |
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities
(KCl) |
Cut-off
grades (KCI) |
Metallurgical
recovery (KCI) |
|
Proven mineral reserves |
38.5 |
24.5% |
19% |
86.5% |
|
Probable mineral reserves |
55.0
|
25.8% |
||
|
Total mineral reserves
|
93.5
|
25.3% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Iberia and reviewed and
accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at
the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Iberia. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
A minimum mining height of 5m was used. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using medium-long term potash
price of $350/t FOB and an exchange rate of €0.88 per US dollar.
|
| • |
White phosphoric acids |
| - |
White phosphate rock from Oron is mined and processed at the
Oron beneficiation plant, and the resulting phosphate concentrate is transported to the Rotem plant for further processing into higher
value-added products, including white phosphoric acids for food applications. The white phosphate rock reserves at Oron are mostly depleted.
Beginning in 2027, the remaining white phosphate rock at Oron will be mined until 2030 and will be used to produce specialty fertilizers.
|
| - |
To maintain current production levels, mining of the available
bituminous phosphate rock at Rotem, which is used to produce white phosphoric acid, is planned to continue until the end of 2029. The
remaining bituminous phosphate rock at Rotem will be allocated to produce other products including specialty fertilizers during 2030.
Overburden containing layers of oil shale is stripped to allow access to the underlying bituminous phosphate rock. An upper limit of around
20% of the total overburden will be allowed to contain oil shale and this will be transported to designated waste dumps and capped using
marl rock. |
| • |
Green phosphoric acids |
| - |
Low organic phosphate rock from the Rotem mine is processed at
the Rotem plant to produce green (impure) phosphoric acids for agricultural applications. This activity is planned to continue through
the end of 2026. |
| - |
The Oron beneficiation plant is being reconfigured to allow the
mining and processing of brown and low organic phosphate rock at Oron, with the resulting phosphate concentrate transported to the Rotem
plant for use in the production of green phosphoric acid through 2040. |
| • |
Fertilizers |
| - |
Bituminous phosphate rock from the center of the Rotem deposit
is mined and utilized for fertilizer production at the Rotem plant, and this activity is planned to continue through the end of 2029.
The remaining bituminous phosphate rock at Rotem will be allocated to produce other products including specialty fertilizers during 2030.
Although significant bituminous phosphate resources exist in the deeper parts of the Rotem deposit, only limited mining of this occurred
due to the presence of thick overburden (10 to 50 meters) containing horizons of oil shale. The oil shale contains 12% to 21% organic
matter and is susceptible to self-combustion when exposed during mining operations. |
| - |
Starting 2030, since the bituminous phosphate rock for fertilizers
will be depleted, brown phosphate rock from Oron will be used to produce additional green phosphoric acid and fertilizers by processing
in the Rotem beneficiation plant. |
| • |
Small scale mining at Zin of approximately 0.2 Mtpa of low organic
phosphate rock is planned to continue for the life of mine using in-pit crushing and screening and final processing at the Oron beneficiation
plant. |
|
Year
Ended December 31, |
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
Tonnes mined (kt) |
3,654
|
5,808 |
5,770 |
|
Grade (%P2O5 before / after beneficiation)
|
23%
/ 31% |
23% / 31% |
25% / 32% |
|
Product
Produced After Processing at ICL Rotem (kt) | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Phosphate Rock* |
2,211
|
2,375 |
2,309 |
|
Green Phosphoric Acid |
513
|
503 |
520 |
|
Fertilizers |
1,017
|
1,024 |
1,033 |
|
White Phosphoric Acid |
167
|
154 |
150 |
|
Specialty Fertilizers |
95
|
100 |
78 |
|
Category
|
White
Phosphate |
Low
Organic Phosphate |
High
Organic & Brown Phosphate |
Bituminous
Phosphate |
Total
|
Grades/
Qualities
|
Cut-off
grades |
Metallurgical
recovery | |
|
(millions
of tonnes) |
(P2O5)
| ||||||||
|
Rotem |
Measured |
- |
17.0 |
- |
61.0 |
78.0 |
28.7% |
25% |
54% and 69% |
|
Indicated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
M + Ind |
- |
17.0 |
- |
61.0 |
78.0 |
28.7% | |||
|
Inferred |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
Zin |
Measured |
- |
11.8 |
10.0 |
24.3 |
46.1 |
25.3% |
23% |
56% |
|
Indicated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
M + Ind |
- |
11.8 |
10.0 |
24.3 |
46.1 |
25.3% | |||
|
Inferred |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
Oron |
Measured |
- |
- |
10.9 |
33.0 |
43.9 |
24.0% |
20% |
59% and 60% |
|
Indicated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
M + Ind |
- |
- |
10.9 |
33.0 |
43.9 |
24.0% | |||
|
Inferred |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- | |||
|
Total |
Measured |
-
|
28.8
|
20.9
|
118.3
|
168.0
|
26.5%
|
||
|
Indicated |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
|
M + Ind |
-
|
28.8
|
20.9
|
118.3
|
168.0
|
26.5%
|
|||
|
Inferred |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Rotem and reviewed and
accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Resources is in-situ.
Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Rotem. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities ranging
from 1.8 to 1.9 t/m3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average of the previous
three years’ prices of $1,177/t FOB for acid products and $441/t FOB for fertilizer products, and exchange rates of NIS 3.61 per
US dollar and €0.88 per US dollar. |
| • |
Rotem site:
The life of mine at Rotem runs from 2026 to 2030 based on 12.3 Mt of reserves of bituminous phosphate, with an annual average mining rate
of 2.5 Mt. From 2026 to 2029, 10.1 Mt will be used to produce white phosphoric acid and fertilizers while the remaining reserves will
be allocated to produce other products including specialty fertilizers in 2030. Reserves of bituminous phosphate are only reported for
areas in which the total overburden required to be mined contains a maximum of around 20% oil shale. Significant resources (61.0 Mt) of
bituminous phosphate are present beneath overburden containing higher amounts of oil shale and the Company plans further technical studies
to assess the potential for mining and stockpiling this overburden. |
| • |
Oron site:
The life of mine at Oron runs from 2026 to 2040 (inclusive) based on 56.1 Mt of reserves of brown and low organic phosphate, of which
0.6 Mt will be mined in 2026 and 28 Mt will be mined in the years 2027-2040 at an annual average mining rate of 2 Mt. In the years 2030-2040,
27.5 Mt of brown phosphate rock will be transported to Rotem beneficiation plant for processing to produce additional green phosphoric
acid and fertilizers at an annual average mining rate of 2.7 Mt. In addition, 2.8 Mt of reserves of white phosphate rock will be mined
from 2026 to 2030. |
| • |
Zin site:
The life of mine at Zin runs from 2026 to 2040 (inclusive) based on: reserves of 3 Mt of low organic phosphate for small-scale product
sales (using minor mining operation equipment located inside the open pit without utilizing the Zin beneficiation plant). Additional resources
(11.8 million tonnes) of low organic phosphate are available at Zin should these be required by the Company in the future.
|
|
Category
|
White
Phosphate |
Low
Organic Phosphate |
High
Organic & Brown Phosphate |
Bituminous
Phosphate |
Total
|
Grades/
Qualities
|
Cut-off
grades |
Metallurgical
recovery | |
|
(millions
of tons) |
(P2O5)
| ||||||||
|
Rotem |
Proven |
- |
0.2 |
- |
12.3 |
12.5 |
29.5% |
25% |
54% and 69% |
|
Probable |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
|
Zin |
Proven |
- |
3.0 |
- |
- |
3.0 |
26.0% |
23% |
50% |
|
Probable |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
|
Oron |
Proven |
2.8 |
2.0 |
54.1 |
- |
58.9 |
23.9% |
20% |
59% and 60% |
|
Probable |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
|
Total |
Proven |
2.8
|
5.2
|
54.1
|
12.3
|
74.4
|
24.9%
|
||
|
Probable |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Rotem and reviewed and
accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves for Rotem and
Oron is defined at the point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants, for Zin it is defined at the point where ore is delivered
to the mobile crusher. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Rotem. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding |
| (6) |
A minimum mining width of 0.5m was used. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average of the previous
three years’ prices of $1,177/t FOB for acid products and $441/t FOB for fertilizer products and $112/t FOB for phosphate rock from
Zin, and exchange rates of NIS 3.61 per US dollar and €0.88 per US dollar. |

|
DSW
Production (kt) | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Potash |
3,572
|
3,700 |
3,819 |
|
Compacting plant* |
1,743
|
1,764 |
1,737 |
|
Bromine |
156
|
190 |
143 |
|
Cast Mg |
18
|
17 |
17 |
| 1. |
Determination of the pumping rate of brines from the northern
Dead Sea area. |
| 2. |
Determination of expected recovery of product based upon:
|
| a. |
Ability to determine composition and consistency of supply.
|
| b. |
Ability to predict consistency of evaporation and mineral precipitation.
|
| 3. |
Determination of Mineral Resource classification is based upon:
|
| a. |
Any variation in the supply rate and composition. |
| b. |
Any variation in the return flow of brines to the northern Dead
Sea basin to assess efficiency and consistency of process. |
| c. |
Variation in the precipitation of mineral amounts. |
| 4. |
Assessment of potential changes to any of the above factors.
|
|
Classification
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities
(KCl) |
Cut-off
grades (KCI) |
Metallurgical
recovery (KCI) |
|
Measured mineral resources |
294.4 |
20.7% |
0% |
80.4% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
1,642.1
|
21.1% |
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral
resources |
1,936.5
|
21.0% |
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
462.4 |
21.2% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by ICL Dead Sea and reviewed
and accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
Mineral Resources are reported as being contained within the
carnallite ponds following pumping from the northern Dead Sea basin. |
| (4) |
Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| (5) |
Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to ICL Dead Sea.
|
| (6) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (7) |
Dead Sea Works is a dredging operation, and therefore no minimum
mining width has been applied. |
| (8) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities of
1.67 t/m3.for carnallite and 2.16 t/m3 for salt. |
| (9) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using a medium-long term potash
price of $320/t FOB and an exchange rate of NIS 3.61 per US dollar. |
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities
(KCl) |
Cut-off
grades (KCI) |
Metallurgical
recovery (KCI) |
|
Proven mineral reserves |
97.7 |
20.5% |
0% |
80.4% |
|
Probable mineral reserves |
-
|
- |
||
|
Total mineral reserves
|
97.7
|
20.5% |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by ICL Dead Sea and reviewed
and accepted by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for the Mineral Reserves is defined at
the point where ore is delivered to the processing plant. |
| (4) |
Mineral Reserves are 100% attributable to ICL Dead Sea.
|
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Dead Sea Works is a dredging operation, and therefore no minimum
mining width has been applied. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a three-year average product
price of $296/t FOB and an exchange rate of NIS 3.61 per US dollar. |

| • |
Grade I (highest grade) > 30% P2O5
- This category of phosphate is weathered and most of the carbonates have been dissolved. It is soft and easy to mine, requiring no blasting.
However, its occurrence is in small patches, requiring highly selective mining. This category comprises less than 10% of the Haikou deposit
and is fed directly to the scrubbing plant for processing. |
| • |
Grade II 24%-30% P2O5
– Harder phosphate material requiring blasting and crushing prior to further processing at the scrubbing plant. This category comprises
around 25% of the Haikou deposit. |
| • |
Grade III 15%-24% P2O5
– This is the hardest rock and requires blasting, crushing, and grinding before further processing. |
|
Total
Mine Production of Raw Ore at YPH | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Tonnes mined (kt) |
3,499
|
3,575 |
3,646 |
|
Grade (% P2O5
before/after beneficiation) |
21%
/ 29% |
21% / 28% |
22% / 28% |
| (1) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
|
Product
Produced After Processing at YPH (kt) | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
Phosphate Rock * |
2,455
|
2,715 |
2,657 |
|
Green Phosphoric Acid |
700
|
694 |
682 |
|
Fertilizers |
639
|
605 |
609 |
|
White Phosphoric Acid |
133
|
124 |
95 |
|
Specialty Fertilizers |
175
|
152 |
113 |
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities
(P2O5)
|
Contained
P2O5
(Mt) |
Contained
P2O5
Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Cut-off
grades (P2O5)
|
Metallurgical
recovery (P2O5)
|
|
Measured mineral resources |
3.0 |
22.3% |
0.67 |
0.33 |
15% |
86.9% |
|
Indicated mineral resources |
2.3
|
24.0%
|
0.55
|
0.28
|
||
|
Measured + Indicated mineral
resources |
5.3
|
23.0%
|
1.22
|
0.61
|
||
|
Inferred mineral resources |
0.2 |
20.0% |
0.04 |
0.02 |
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Resources is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Resources were estimated by YPH and reviewed and accepted
by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for Mineral Resources is defined on an
in-situ basis. Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| (4) |
YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of ICL. The reported tonnages
and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5
attributable to ICL reflects the Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns
a 50% minority interest in YPH. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using average dry densities ranging
from 2.29 to 2.78 t/m3. |
| (7) |
Mineral Resources are estimated using an average of the previous
three years’ prices of $675/t FOB for acid products and $459/t FOB for fertilizer products and an exchange rate of 7.20 RMB per
US dollar. |
|
Amount
(Mt) |
Grades/
Qualities
(P2O5)
|
Contained
P2O5
(Mt) |
Contained
P2O5
Attributable to ICL (Mt) |
Cut-off
grades (P2O5)
|
Metallurgical
recovery (P2O5)
|
|
Proven mineral reserves |
40.5 |
21.6% |
8.7 |
4.4 |
15% |
86.9% |
|
Probable mineral reserves |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
|
Total mineral reserves
|
40.5
|
21.6%
|
8.7
|
4.4
|
| (1) |
Classification of Mineral Reserves is in accordance with the
definitions prescribed under Regulation S-K 1300. |
| (2) |
Mineral Reserves were estimated by YPH and reviewed and accepted
by SLR. |
| (3) |
The point of reference for Mineral Reserves is defined at the
point where ore is delivered to the beneficiation plants. |
| (4) |
YPH is a consolidated subsidiary of ICL. The reported tonnages
and grades are on a 100% basis. The contained P2O5
attributable to ICL reflects the Company’s 50% interest. While YPH is consolidated into ICL’s financial statements, YYTH owns
a 50% minority interest in YPH. |
| (5) |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate, and numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
| (6) |
A minimum mining width of 1.0m was used. |
| (7) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average of the previous
three years’ prices of $675/t FOB for acid products and $459/t FOB for fertilizer products and an exchange rate of 7.20 RMB per
US dollar. |
| A. |
OPERATING RESULTS |
|
Average prices |
2025
|
2024
|
VS
2024 |
|
Granular potash – Brazil |
CFR spot
($ per tonne) |
348
|
299 |
16.4% |
|
Granular potash – Northwest Europe
|
CIF spot/contract
(€ per tonne) |
355
|
349 |
1.7% |
|
Standard potash – Southeast Asia
|
CFR spot
($ per tonne) |
348
|
294 |
18.4% |
|
Potash imports |
||||
|
To Brazil |
million tonnes |
13.3
|
13.4 |
(0.7)% |
|
To China |
million tonnes |
12.8
|
12.6 |
1.6% |
|
To India |
million tonnes |
2.9
|
3.1 |
(6.5)% |
|
Average prices |
$ per tonne |
2025
|
2024
|
VS
2024 |
|
DAP |
CFR India Spot |
720
|
587 |
23% |
|
TSP |
CFR Brazil Spot |
555
|
465 |
19% |
|
SSP |
CPT Brazil inland 18-20% P2O5 Spot |
296
|
283 |
5% |
|
Sulphur |
Bulk FOB Adnoc monthly contract |
286
|
100 |
186% |
|
For
the Year Ended December 31, | ||||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
||
|
US$
millions | ||||
|
Operating income
|
580
|
775
|
1,141
|
|
Charges related to the security situation
in Israel (1) |
54
|
57 |
14 |
|
Impairment and write-off of assets and provision
for site closure (2) |
131
|
35 |
49 |
|
Provision for early retirement (3)
|
28
|
4 |
16 |
|
Legal proceedings, dispute, and other settlement
expenses (4) |
80
|
2
|
(2)
|
|
Total adjustments to operating
income |
293
|
98
|
77
|
|
Adjusted operating income
|
873
|
873
|
1,218
|
|
Net income attributable
to the shareholders of the Company |
226
|
407 |
647 |
|
Total adjustments to operating income
|
293
|
98 |
77 |
|
Total tax adjustments (5)
|
(54)
|
(21)
|
(9)
|
|
Total adjusted net income
- shareholders of the Company |
465
|
484
|
715
|
| (1) |
For 2025, 2024 and 2023, reflects charges relating to the security
situation in Israel. |
| (2) |
For 2025, reflects mainly asset write-offs resulting from the
closure of LFP projects, impairment of assets in the Company’s UK operation, and a small R&D activity in Israel, following the
implementation of the Company’s strategy, including efficiency and cost-reduction programs. It also includes asset write-offs related
to a fire at Ashdod Port and two portfolio companies due to failed business continuity and funding. For 2024, reflects mainly a write-off
of assets resulting from the closure of small sites in Israel and Turkey. For 2023, reflects mainly a write-off of assets related to restructuring
at certain sites, including site closures and facility modifications as part of the Company’s global efficiency plan. |
| (3) |
For 2025, 2024 and 2023, reflects provisions for early retirement
due to restructuring at certain sites, as part of the Company’s global efficiency plan.
|
| (4) |
For 2025, reflects a provision for prior years following a Supreme
Court ruling regarding water extraction fees in the Dead Sea concession area. For 2024, reflects reimbursement of arbitration costs associated
with the Ethiopian potash project. For 2023, reflects a reversal of a legal provision. |
| (5) |
For 2025, 2024 and 2023, reflects the tax impact of adjustments
made to operating income. |
|
For
the Years Ended December 31, |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
| ||
|
2025
|
2024
| ||
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
||
|
Sales |
7,153
|
6,841 |
5% |
|
Cost of sales |
4,967
|
4,585
|
8% |
|
Gross profit |
2,186
|
2,256 |
(3)% |
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses
|
1,114
|
1,114 |
0% |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
299
|
259 |
15% |
|
Research and development expenses |
70
|
69 |
1% |
|
Other expenses |
161
|
60 |
168% |
|
Other income |
(38)
|
(21)
|
81% |
|
Operating income
|
580
|
775
|
(25)% |
|
Finance expenses |
298
|
181 |
65% |
|
Finance income |
(159)
|
(41)
|
288% |
|
Finance expenses, net
|
139
|
140 |
(1)% |
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees
|
-
|
1
|
(100)% |
|
Income before taxes on
income |
441
|
636 |
(31)% |
|
Taxes on income |
161
|
172
|
(6)% |
|
Net income |
280
|
464 |
(40)% |
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling
interests |
54
|
57
|
(5)% |
|
Net income attributable
to shareholders of the Company |
226
|
407 |
(44)% |
|
Earnings per share attributable
to shareholders of the Company: |
|||
|
Basic earnings per share (in dollars)
|
0.18
|
0.32 |
(44)% |
|
Diluted earnings per share (in dollars)
|
0.18
|
0.32 |
(44)% |
|
Sales
|
Expenses
|
Operating
income |
||
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
YTD 2024 figures
|
6841
|
(6,066)
|
775
|
|
|
Total adjustments YTD 2024* |
- |
98
|
98
|
|
|
Adjusted YTD 2024 figures
|
6,841
|
(5,968)
|
873
|
|
|
Quantity |
(56)
|
30
|
(26)
|
![]() |
|
Price |
298
|
- |
298
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
70
|
(113)
|
(43)
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
(129)
|
(129)
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
(2)
|
(2)
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
34
|
34
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
- |
(132)
|
(132)
|
![]() |
|
Adjusted YTD 2025 figures
|
7,153
|
(6,280)
|
873
|
|
|
Total adjustments YTD 2025* |
- |
(293)
|
(293)
|
|
|
YTD 2025 figures
|
7,153
|
(6,573)
|
580
|
| - |
Quantity –
The negative impact on operating income was mainly due to lower sales volumes of potash, bromine-based flame retardants, elemental bromine
and FertilizerpluS products. This was partially offset by higher sales volumes of WPA, food specialties, phosphate fertilizers, industrial
salts, MAP used as raw materials for energy storage solutions, phosphorus-based flame retardants, clear brine fluids and specialty agriculture
products. |
| - |
Price –
The positive impact on operating income was primarily related to an increase of $34 in the potash price (CIF) per tonne, as well as higher
selling prices of phosphate fertilizers, specialty agriculture products, FertilizerpluS products, bromine- and phosphorus-based flame
retardants, elemental bromine, and specialty minerals products. This was partially offset by lower selling prices of food specialties
and WPA. |
| - |
Exchange rates
– The unfavorable impact on operating income was mainly due to higher operational costs resulting mainly from the appreciation of
the average exchange rate of the euro and the Israeli shekel against the US dollar, which outweighed their positive impact on sales. This
impact was partially offset by a favorable impact from the Brazilian real depreciation. |
| - |
Raw materials
– The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to higher costs of sulphur, commodity fertilizers and nitrogen.
This was partially offset by lower costs of ammonia and raw materials used in the production of industrial solutions products. |
| - |
Transportation
– The positive impact on operating income was due to reduced marine transportation costs, primarily to Brazil, China and India.
|
| - |
Operating and other
expenses – The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to higher maintenance and operational costs, as
well as higher royalties' payments. |
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
$ millions
|
NIS
millions |
|
2025 |
442 |
1,524 |
|
2024 |
364 |
1,348 |
|
2023 |
652 |
2,399 |
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Segment Sales |
1,254
|
1,239 |
|
Sales to external customers
|
1,238
|
1,220 |
|
Sales to internal customers
|
16
|
19 |
|
Segment Operating Income
|
220
|
224 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
60
|
57 |
|
Segment EBITDA |
280
|
281 |
|
Capital expenditures |
81
|
94 |
|
Year
Ended December 31, | ||
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
| |
|
Asia |
403
|
438 |
|
Europe |
382
|
388 |
|
North America |
389
|
327 |
|
South America |
21
|
20 |
|
Rest of the world |
43
|
47
|
|
Total |
1,238
|
1,220 |
|
Sales
|
Expenses
|
Operating
income |
||
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
YTD 2024 figures
|
1,239
|
(1,015)
|
224
|
|
|
Quantity |
(58)
|
42
|
(16)
|
![]() |
|
Price |
63
|
-
|
63
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
10
|
(23)
|
(13)
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
11
|
11
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
(2)
|
(2)
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
1
|
1
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
-
|
(48)
|
(48)
|
![]() |
|
YTD 2025 figures
|
1,254
|
(1,034)
|
220
|
| - |
Quantity –
The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to a decrease in sales volumes of bromine-based flame retardants, elemental
bromine and phosphorus-based industrial solutions. This impact was partially offset by higher sales volumes of phosphorus-based flame
retardants and clear brine fluids. |
| - |
Price –
The positive impact on operating income was due to higher selling prices of elemental bromine, phosphorus- and bromine-based flame retardants
and specialty minerals. This was partially offset by decreased prices of clear brine fluids. |
| - |
Exchange rates
– The negative impact on operating income was mainly due to higher operational cost resulted from the appreciation of the average
exchange rate of the Israeli shekel and the euro against the US dollar, partially offset by higher sales driven by the stronger euro.
|
| - |
Raw materials
– The positive impact on operating income was driven by decreased raw materials costs. |
| - |
Operating and other
expenses – The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to higher operational expenses. |
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Segment Sales |
1,714
|
1,656 |
|
Potash sales to external
customers |
1,308
|
1,237 |
|
Potash sales to internal
customers |
89
|
95 |
|
Other and eliminations (1)
|
317
|
324 |
|
Gross Profit |
622
|
650 |
|
Segment Operating Income
|
298
|
250 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
254
|
242 |
|
Segment EBITDA |
552
|
492 |
|
Capital expenditures |
367
|
332 |
|
Potash price - CIF ($ per tonne) |
333
|
299 |
| (1) |
Primarily includes salt produced in Spain, metal magnesium-based
products, chlorine, and sales of excess electricity produced by ICL’s power plant at the Dead Sea in Israel. |
|
Year
Ended December 31, | ||
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
| |
|
Europe |
443
|
405 |
|
South America |
421
|
401 |
|
Asia |
390
|
352 |
|
North America |
175
|
202 |
|
Rest of the world |
102
|
102
|
|
Total |
1,531
|
1,462 |
|
Sales
|
Expenses
|
Operating
income |
||
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
YTD 2024 figures
|
1,656
|
(1,406)
|
250
|
|
|
Quantity |
(60)
|
38
|
(22)
|
![]() |
|
Price |
102
|
- |
102
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
16
|
(31)
|
(15)
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
3
|
3
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
(9)
|
(9)
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
24
|
24
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
- |
(35)
|
(35)
|
![]() |
|
YTD 2025 figures
|
1,714
|
(1,416)
|
298
|
| - |
Quantity –The
negative impact on operating income was primarily due to lower potash sales volumes in the US, as well as decreased sales volumes of magnesium,
partially offset by higher potash sales volumes, mainly in Europe and India. |
| - |
Price –The
positive impact on operating income was primarily driven by a $34 year-over-year increase in the potash price (CIF) per tonne. |
| - |
Exchange rates
– The unfavorable impact on operating income was mainly due to higher operational costs resulting from the appreciation of the average
exchange rate of the euro and the Israeli shekel against the US dollar, partially offset by higher sales driven by the stronger euro and
pound. |
| - |
Energy –
The negative impact on operating income was primarily due to higher water fees. |
| - |
Transportation –
The positive impact on operating income was primarily due to reduced marine transportation costs, primarily to Brazil, China and India.
|
| - |
Operating and other
expenses –The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to higher maintenance and operational costs,
as well as higher royalties' payments. |
|
Thousands of Tonnes
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
Production |
4,377
|
4,502 |
|
Total sales (including internal sales)
|
4,320
|
4,556 |
|
Closing inventory |
286
|
229 |
| - |
Production –
Production was 125 thousand tonnes lower year-over-year, mainly due to operational challenges. |
| - |
Sales – The
quantity of potash sold was 236 thousand tonnes lower year-over-year, mainly due to lower production in the first half of the year and
adverse weather conditions toward year-end that disrupted loading operations at Ashdod Port, leading to reduced sales volumes primarily
in the US and South America. |
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Segment Sales |
2,333
|
2,215 |
|
Sales to external customers
|
2,156
|
2,049 |
|
Sales to internal customers
|
177
|
166 |
|
Segment Operating Income
|
342
|
358 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
186
|
191 |
|
Segment EBITDA |
528
|
549 |
|
Capital expenditures |
336
|
340 |
| (1) |
For 2025, Phosphate Specialties accounted for $1,332 million
of segment sales, $157 million of operating income, $49 million of D&A and $206 million of EBITDA, while Phosphate Commodities accounted
for $1,001 million of segment sales, $185 million of operating income, $137 million of D&A and represented $322 million of EBITDA.
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, | ||
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
| |
|
Asia |
687
|
594 |
|
North America |
573
|
567 |
|
Europe |
454
|
478 |
|
South America |
340
|
306 |
|
Rest of the world |
102
|
104
|
|
Total |
2,156
|
2,049 |
|
Sales
|
Expenses
|
Operating
income |
||
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
YTD 2024 figures
|
2,215
|
(1,857)
|
358
|
|
|
Quantity |
27
|
(6)
|
21
|
![]() |
|
Price |
73
|
- |
73
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
18
|
(21)
|
(3)
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
(96)
|
(96)
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
(1)
|
(1)
|
![]() |
|
Transportation |
- |
9
|
9
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
- |
(19)
|
(19)
|
![]() |
|
YTD 2025 figures
|
2,333
|
(1,991)
|
342
|
| - |
Quantity –
The positive impact on operating income was primarily due to higher sales volumes of phosphate fertilizers, WPA, phosphate-based food
additives, salts and MAP used as raw materials for energy storage solutions. |
| - |
Price –
The positive impact on operating income was primarily related to higher selling prices of phosphate fertilizers and MAP used as raw materials
for energy storage solutions. This was partially offset by lower selling prices of phosphate-based food additives, WPA and salts.
|
| - |
Exchange rates
– The unfavorable impact on operating income was mainly due to higher operational costs resulting mainly from the appreciation of
the average exchange rate of the euro and the Israeli shekel against the US dollar. This impact was partially offset by higher sales resulting
mainly from the appreciation of the British pound. |
| - |
Raw materials
– The negative impact on operating income was primarily due to higher costs of Sulphur, partially offset by lower cost of ammonia.
|
| - |
Transportation
– The positive impact on operating income was due to a decrease in marine and inland transportation costs. |
| - |
Operating and other
expenses – The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to higher maintenance and operational expenses.
|
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Segment Sales |
2,063
|
1,950 |
|
Sales to external customers
|
2,048
|
1932 |
|
Sales to internal customers
|
15
|
18 |
|
Segment Operating Income
|
135
|
128 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
78
|
74 |
|
Segment EBITDA |
213
|
202 |
|
Capital expenditures |
95
|
98 |
|
Year
Ended December 31, | ||
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
| |
|
Europe |
766
|
727 |
|
South America |
651
|
627 |
|
Asia |
270
|
248 |
|
North America |
204
|
168 |
|
Rest of the world |
157
|
162
|
|
Total |
2,048
|
1,932 |
|
Sales
|
Expenses
|
Operating
income |
||
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
YTD 2024 figures
|
1,950
|
(1,822)
|
128
|
|
|
Quantity |
1
|
(1)
|
- |
![]() |
|
Price |
92
|
- |
92
|
![]() |
|
Exchange rates |
20
|
(19)
|
1
|
![]() |
|
Raw materials |
- |
(79)
|
(79)
|
![]() |
|
Energy |
- |
10
|
10
|
![]() |
|
Operating and other expenses |
- |
(17)
|
(17)
|
![]() |
|
YTD 2025 figures
|
2,063
|
(1,928)
|
135
|
| - |
Price –
The positive impact on operating income was due to higher selling prices of specialty agriculture, turf and ornamental and FertilizerpluS
products. |
| - |
Exchange rates
– The favorable impact on operating income was mainly due to the appreciation of the average exchange rate of the euro and the Israeli
shekel against the US dollar, partially offset by the depreciation of the Brazilian real. |
| - |
Raw materials
– The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to higher costs of commodity fertilizers, sulphur and nitrogen.
|
| - |
Energy - The
positive impact on operating income was primarily due to decreased electricity and gas prices. |
| - |
Operating and other
expenses – The negative impact on operating income was primarily related to higher maintenance and operational costs.
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, | ||
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
| |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
1,056
|
1,468 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(915)
|
(694) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(195)
|
(846) |
| • |
We continue to advance magnesia-based formulations targeting
unmet market needs. We launched TextiMag®, a magnesium-based formulation designed for textile coatings that absorb body odors and
enhance skin wellness. We are also marketing CareMag® D, a solution that enables the production of aluminum salt-free deodorants,
already adopted by several leading international companies. In addition, we introduced FruitMag™, a new formulation used as a firming
agent for post-harvest treatment of citrus fruits. |
| • |
We continue to develop "low loss" flame retardants for intensive
computing applications, including AI and data centers, in collaborating with leading industry players. |
| • |
Our R&D efforts remain focused on enhancing the sustainability
of our flame-retardant portfolio through Circular Economy solutions and the development of new sustainable products. |
| • |
We are developing CDA, a solution for biofilm contamination across
food, beverage, healthcare, and pharmaceutical markets, designed to integrates seamlessly into existing cleaning processes. |
| • |
We are using our Bromoquel® product, a solution for treating
bromine leakage, both within our own facilities and commercially to external customers |
| • |
The Potash segment continues to advance environmental research,
including developing methods to treat and reduce effluents. |
| • |
The segment is exploring alternative solutions to increase carnallite
production capacity and quality in its evaporation ponds, with a focus on utilizing renewable energy sources. |
| • |
Additional initiatives at potash production facilities focus
on increasing production capacity while reducing industrial water consumption and overall production costs. |
| • |
The segment conducted an analysis of adapting various potential
types of phosphate rock to produce phosphoric acid and its downstream products as part of an effort to utilize and increase existing phosphate
reserves. In 2025, the segment advanced this initiative by analyzing additional types of phosphate, supported by focused R&D activities,
pilot trials, plant testing and comprehensive economic feasibility assessments. The segment will continue these activities also in 2026
with a strategic focus on prioritizing opportunities that support long term growth. |
| • |
Research was conducted regarding environmental protection, including
developing methods to treat and reduce effluents and applications for Phosphogypsum uses and ponds reclamation. |
| • |
The segment investigated opportunities to integrate waste steams
into our production processes, fostering a closed-loop circular economy and development of future sources for sustainable fertilizer products.
|
| • |
The segment engaged in developing a new fertilizer product that
contributes to plant growth, such as PK granulated fertilizer based on SOP. |
| • |
The segment developed a process to meet the requirement to reduce
Cadmium (Cd) content in the granulated fertilizers. |
| • |
The Specialties R&D group supported further growth in the
traditional markets and application areas of Meat/Poultry/Seafood, Dairy, and Bakery as evidenced by the establishment of three Centers
of Excellence, located in Germany and in the US. A new food lab was opened in India to serve the customer needs of the region. We also
expanded our footprint in emerging markets through sustainable and affordable solutions. New launches included innovative products beyond
phosphates for clean label and texture improvement. |
| • |
The Front-End Innovation group has scouted over 700 food technology
start-ups globally to identify disruptive technologies for ICL Food Specialties. This rigorous process led to the successful identification
and establishment of a partnership with Japan's largest food tech start-up, DAIZ Engineering (now called SproutX Inc). Their patented
germination technology significantly reduces soybean off-flavors and enhances umami and fibrous structure, enabling the production of
superior textured soy protein. After having been proven successful in the Japanese market, this innovation will now be introduced to the
EU market through our collaboration, reinforcing ICL Food Specialties’ commitment to advancing cutting-edge solutions in plant-based
meat and seafood alternatives. |
| • |
The Company continued to diversify and develop its product portfolio
for meat substitutes: ICL Food Specialties and DAIZ Engineering partnered to launch ROVITARIS® SprouTx™, a revolutionary textured
soy protein developed with proprietary seed germination technology. This innovative solution effectively addresses key unmet needs in
taste, texture, and nutrition for plant-based meat and seafood alternatives. The ROVITARIS® SprouTx® textured soy protein received
the "Best Plant-Based Product" title at the World Food Innovation Awards and won the Plant-Based Category at the Fi Europe Innovation
Awards. In 2025 the Company successfully launched the product in the European market, accompanied by widespread positive feedback from
industry stakeholders and customers. |
| • |
In the fourth quarter of 2024, we announced a follow-on investment
in Plantible Foods, an investment which builds upon ICL's initial participation and furthers the strategic collaboration between the two
companies. In October 2023, ICL Food Specialties, in collaboration with Plantible Foods, launched Rovitaris Binding Solution powered by
Rubi Protein. This innovative ingredient was honored with the Ingredient Idol award at the SupplySide West (SSW) conference in November
2024 and recognized as the most innovative food ingredient of the year. Our engagement with customers and showcasing prototypes at different
conferences continues. |
| • |
The Advanced Additives business introduced four new corrosion
inhibitor additives within our Paints and Coatings portfolio. Two are targeted to replace chromium based anti-corrosion additives which
have high toxicity and are under pressure for replacement in aluminum-based coatings. In addition, Novel oral care additives are under
evaluation by major players globally with promising results. |
| • |
The development of controlled-release fertilizers with biodegradable
coatings, designed to meet the EU Fertilizer Product standards, has been delayed from 2026 to 2028. In 2025, our biodegradable product
was certified by CerTrust as compliant with the applicable biodegradation criteria. |
| • |
Development of innovative bio-stimulant products, including bio-stimulants
embedded or blended with ICL fertilizers, designed to enhance fertilizer performance and improve the plant resistance to abiotic stresses.
|
| • |
Development of biological bio-stimulants, both internally and
externally, designed to encourage plant growth and enhance resilience to various stress conditions. In 2025, bacterial candidates were
field-tested across different countries in the US with positive results. These candidates demonstrate potential for commercialization
as bio-stimulants for soybean and cotton crops grown under extreme weather conditions within the next two years. They meet key product
requirements, including efficacy, stability, shelf life, and compatibility with fertilizers.. |
| • |
Development of fertilizers to improve nutrient-use efficiency
and reduce environmental emissions. |
| • |
Development of liquid and fully soluble fertilizers supplemented
with unique additives. |
| • |
Development of products designed to improve water use efficiency.
|
| • |
Enhancement of micronutrients solutions and sulfur fertilizer
formulations. |
| • |
Integration of secondary source phosphate technologies for immediate
utilization at our production facilities in Europe as part of our Circular Economy approach and the advancement of future sources of our
fertilizer products, including the establishment of a technology roadmap for recycling and recovering phosphorous and nitrogen from secondary
sources to transition our products into sustainable fertilizers. |
| • |
Development of fertilizers with higher agronomic nutrient efficiency.
|
| • |
Development of customized formulations tailored to meet specific
customer requirements. |
| • |
As part of the segment's efforts to expand its product portfolio
and strengthen relationship with farmers, in 2024, the Company launched several new products in its bio-stimulants line, including microbial
products. One of these is Bioz ActiJump, a biological inoculant for soybeans. It contains live nitrogen-fixing bacteria designed to enhance
soybean growth by promoting more extensive root development and improving nitrogen fixation. |
| • |
In 2025, we launched our foliar drone spray water-soluble fertilizer
technology under the brand FertiBuzz globally and FertiDrone in India. The use of drones for foliar fertilizers application is gaining
popularity, and the Company introduced a unique ultra-low volume fertilizer specifically formulated for effective drones-based application.
In addition, the segment launched a new product under its FertilizerpluS product line – PotashpluS 45%, a compacted blend of Polysulphate®
and potash, featuring a new nutrient ratio. This product provides an ideal combination of potassium and sulfur fertilizer, enriched with
calcium and magnesium. |
| • |
Eqo®, eqo-x and eqo-s® - a group of brand names for
innovative fast biodegradable controlled-release fertilizers designed to meet new EU fertilizers standards due to take effect in 2026.
|
| • |
Keep Green® - a brand name for a novel biostimulant to protect
plants against excessive sun radiation and temperature. |
| • |
Sulfurgran® - a leading product and brand in the sulfur
market in Brazil. |
| • |
Profol® - a leading foliar nutrition product line and brand
in Brazil. |
| • |
Osmocote® - a leading brand in the area of controlled released
fertilizers which uses innovative technologies and is used globally by container nursery stocks, pot-plant growers and more. |
| • |
Peters® - a brand of water-soluble fertilizers, specifically
designed for bedding-, pot- and container nursery plants. |
| • |
Joha® - a global brand of dairy specialties, which specializes
in emulsifying salts for processed cheese. |
| • |
Tari® - a brand in the meat industry as well as in the artisan
business which focuses on the production and processing of meat products with functional additives, spices and flavors. |
| • |
Brifisol® - a global brand in the meat and seafood industries,
which concentrates in improving texture by adding cryoprotectant for frozen food products such as meat, shrimp, fish filets and more.
|
| • |
Rovitaris® - a brand name for plant-based meat alternatives
that are virtually indistinguishable from their traditional meat counterparts. |
| • |
Fyrol® - a brand name for a range of phosphorus-containing
flame retardants targeting flexible and rigid polyurethane foam applications. |
| • |
Merquel® - a line of inorganic brominated salts which can
be used to control mercury emissions from coal power plants. |
| A. |
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS |
|
Name
|
Age
|
Commencement
date as director |
Director
Qualification |
Financial
Expertise |
Membership
in Board Committees | ||
|
Under
the Israeli Companies Law |
Under
the NYSE rules |
Under
the Israeli Companies Law |
Under
the SEC rules | ||||
|
Yoav Doppelt (Executive Chairman of the Board)
|
57 |
December 2018 and as CoB since July 2019
|
(1) |
- |
- |
-
| |
|
Aviad Kaufman |
55 |
March 2014 |
(1) |
Financial Expert |
- |
Financing Committee (member) | |
|
Avisar Paz |
69 |
April 2001 |
(1) |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
- |
Financing Committee (member)
|
|
Lior Reitblatt |
68 |
November 2017 |
Independent Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Audit & Accounting Committee (member)
Compensation Committee (member) |
|
Reem Aminoach |
64 |
March 2017 |
(2) |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
- |
Regulation Committee (member) |
|
Sagi Kabla |
49 |
February 2016 |
(1) |
Financial Expert |
- |
Financing Committee (Chair)
Climate, Sustainability & Community Committee
(member) | |
|
Tzipi Ozer Armon |
60 |
January 2020 |
Independent Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
- |
Regulation Committee (member)
|
|
Gadi Lesin |
58 |
March 2021 |
Independent Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Audit & Accounting Committee (member)
Climate, Sustainability & Community Committee
(member) |
|
Dr. Miriam Haran |
76 |
July 2021 |
External Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Audit & Accounting Committee (member)
Compensation Committee (Chair)
Climate, Sustainability & Community Committee
(Chair)
Regulation Committee (member) |
|
Dafna Gruber
|
60 |
January 2022 |
External Director |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Audit & Accounting Committee (Chair)
Compensation Committee (member)
Financing Committee (member) |
|
Michal Silverberg |
49 |
July 2022 |
(2) |
Independent Director |
Financial Expert |
- |
- |
|
Shalom Shlomo |
48 |
January 2024 |
Independent Director |
Independent Director |
- |
- |
Regulation Committee (Chair)
Climate, Sustainability & Community Committee
(member) |
| (1) |
Messrs. Yoav Doppelt, Aviad Kaufman and Sagi Kabla are not considered
independent directors under Israeli law and the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards rules by virtue of the positions
they hold with our controlling shareholder or in the Company. On July 18, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors determined that
Mr. Avisar Paz qualifies as an independent director under the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards. Mr.
Paz is not considered independent under Israeli law by virtue of the positions he previously held with our controlling shareholder.
|
| (2) |
Mr. Reem Aminoach and Ms. Michal Silverberg meet all qualifications
for Independent Directors under the Companies Law but were not formally classified as such. |
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Elad Aharonson |
52 |
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Lilach Geva-Harel |
49 |
Deputy Chief Executive Officer |
|
Aviram Lahav(1)
|
66 |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Ilan Barkai |
57 |
President, ICL Potash Division & Head
of Israel Phosphate Operation |
|
Nir Ilani |
49 |
President, ICL Growing Solutions Division
|
|
Yaniv Kabalek |
51 |
President, ICL Industrial Products Division
|
|
Nadav Turner |
50 |
President, ICL Phosphate Specialty Solutions
Division |
|
Anantha N. Desikan |
58 |
Executive Vice President, ICL Chief Innovation
and Technology Officer |
|
Ilana Fahima |
60 |
Executive Vice President, Chief People
Officer |
|
Miri Mishor(2)
|
62 |
Executive Vice President, Global Information
Technology |
|
Uri Perelman |
45 |
Executive Vice President, ICL Chief Corporate
Business Development Officer |
|
Amir Meshulam |
49 |
Senior Vice President, Global Internal Auditor
|
|
Maya Grinfeld |
50 |
Senior Vice President, ICL Marketing and Communication
|
| (1) |
Mr. Aviram Lahav will conclude his tenure
as ICL's CFO on June 15, 2026, towards his retirement. Asaf Alperovitz will succeed Mr. Lahav as the CFO, effective as of that date.
|
| (2) |
Ms. Miri Mishor will cease to serve as the Company’s EVP,
Global Information Technology, effective as of April 30, 2026, and will be succeeded by Ms. Alegra Kilstein, effective as of June 1, 2026.
|
|
Expert
Directors |
Non-Expert
Director | |
|
Fixed Annual Fee |
~NIS 170,000 (approximately
$49,500) |
~NIS 128,000 (approximately
$37,000) |
|
Per Meeting Fee |
~NIS 6,550 (approximately $1,900) |
~NIS 4,900 (approximately $1,400) |
|
Non-executive
Director |
Fixed
Annual Fee |
Aggregate
Per Meeting Fees |
Total
|
|
Aviad Kaufman |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 163,247 (~$47,387) |
NIS 333,627 (~$96,844) |
|
Avisar Paz |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 185,516 (~$53,851) |
NIS 355,896 (~$103,308) |
|
Dafna Gruber |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 245,852 (~$71,365) |
NIS 416,232 (~$120,822) |
|
Gadi Lesin |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 218,302 (~$63,368) |
NIS 388,682 (~$112,825) |
|
Lior Reitblatt |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 234,035 (~$67,935) |
NIS 404,415 (~$117,392) |
|
Michal Silverberg |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 166,331 (~$48,282) |
NIS 336,711 (~$97,739) |
|
Dr. Miriam Haran |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 286,477 (~$83,157) |
NIS 456,857 (~$132,615) |
|
Reem Aminoach |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 113,416 (~$32,922) |
NIS 283,796 (~$82,379) |
|
Sagi Kabla* |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 211,538 (~$61,404) |
NIS 381,918 (~$110,862) |
|
Tzipi Ozer-Armon |
NIS 170,380 (~$49,457) |
NIS 152,744 (~$44,338) |
NIS 323,124 (~$93,795) |
|
Shalom Shlomo |
NIS 127,740 (~$37,080) |
NIS 142,051 (~$41,234) |
NIS 269,791 (~$78,314) |
| (1) |
Annual Cost of employment:
NIS 1,963,000 (approximately $615,360), which reflects the annual fixed employment cost of NIS 1.8 million (approximately $564,263) under
the 2022 terms, as adjusted for inflation since July 2022, of which the Annual Base Salary amounts to NIS 1.68 million (approximately
$0.53 million). |
| (2) |
Short term incentive:
Mr. Doppelt is eligible for an annual cash bonus based on the Executive Chairman’s short-term incentive (STI) formula set forth
in the Company’s Compensation Policy, with a target STI, which is also the maximum potential payout of NIS 1,309,300 (approximately
$410,439) per year, which reflects the maximum potential payout of NIS 1.2 million (approximately $0.38 million) under the 2022 terms,
adjusted for inflation since then. As of December 31, 2025, following further adjustments to the CPI, the target STI and the maximum potential
STI payout for a full year are NIS 1.34 million (approximately $0.42 million), while the pro-rated for the 2022 terms and the renewed
terms target STI and the maximum potential STI payout for 2025 are NIS 1.31 million (approximately $0.41 million). |
| (3) |
Termination Arrangement:
Remains unchanged from the 2022 terms, under which in the event of termination of Mr. Doppelt's term of office as Executive Chairman of
the Board, he is entitled to a six‑month adjustment period and a six‑month advance notice period, during both of which all
compensation components, including STI payouts and the continued vesting of existing LTI plans, continue to apply. |
| (4) |
Other Benefits:
Mr. Doppelt is entitled to additional cash and non-cash benefits similar to those payable to senior executives of the Company, including
but not limited to, pension and severance pay, life insurance (risk), annual vacation days (and redemption of accrued vacation days),
sick days quota, recuperation days and expenses reimbursement. All of Mr. Doppelt’s compensation components, including base salary
and STI, are subject to periodical adjustment in accordance with increases in the CPI, with the baseline being the January 2025 CPI, published
on February 15, 2025, subject to the maximum amounts for each compensation component as set forth in the Compensation Policy. |
|
Grant
for Year |
Grant
Date |
Type
of Equity |
Dates
of Governance Bodies' Approvals |
Grant
Value (NIS)(3)
|
Number
of Options |
Expiration
Date |
|
2022-2024(1)
|
March 30, 2022 |
Options |
HR & Comp. Committee – 31.1.22 &
6.2.22
Board – 8.2.22
Shareholders (Annual GM) – 30.3.22
|
9 million
(2.8 million per vesting annum) |
1,055,100 |
March 30, 2027
|
|
2025-2027(2)
|
March 6, 2025 |
Options |
HR & Comp. Committee – 31.12.24
& 6.1.25
Board – 9.1.25
Shareholders (Annual GM) – 6.3.25
|
11.25 million (3.5 million per vesting annum)
|
1,973,684 |
March 6, 2030 |
|
Vesting
Schedule | ||||||
|
The options will vest in three equal tranches,
upon each of the three anniversaries of the grant date. Options fully accelerate if Mr. Doppelt ceases to provide services within 12 months
following a change of control (as defined in the Equity Plan), except in the event of termination for cause.
| ||||||
| (1) |
The equity award was granted pursuant to the Company’s
Equity Compensation Plan (2014), as amended in June 2016. |
| (2) |
The equity award was granted pursuant to the Company’s
Equity Compensation Plan (2024). |
| (3) |
Translated at the US dollar exchange rate as of December 31,
2025. |
|
Details
of the Recipient |
Payments
for services | ||||||
|
Name
|
Position
|
Scope
of position |
Base
Salary |
Compensation
(1) |
Bonus
(STI) (2) |
Equity
based compensation (LTI)(3) |
Total
|
|
US$
thousand | |||||||
|
Elad Aharonson (4)
|
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
100% |
752 |
1,990 |
854 |
2,703 |
5,547 |
|
Yoav Doppelt (5)
|
Executive Chairman of the Board
|
Invests significant portion of his time
|
476 |
567 |
411 |
1,642 |
2,620 |
|
Uri Perelman (6)
|
EVP, Chief Corporate BD Officer |
100% |
350 |
807 |
273 |
771 |
1,851 |
|
Aviram Lahav (7)
|
Chief Financial Officer |
100% |
442 |
663 |
359 |
657 |
1,679 |
|
Raviv Zoller (8)
|
Former President & Chief Executive Officer
|
100% |
810 |
1,323 |
- |
140 |
1,463 |
| (1) |
The salary items (compensation) column in the above table includes
all of the following components: base salary, customary social benefits, customary social and related provisions, Company car and reimbursement
of telephone expenses. |
| (2) |
The annual bonuses (STI awards) to officer holders for 2025,
including the top five earners in 2025, were approved by our HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors on February 15,
2026, and February 17, 2026, respectively. |
| (3) |
The expense for share-based payment compensation is calculated
in accordance with IFRS and is recognized in the Company’s statement of income over the vesting period of each portion. The amounts
reported in this column represent the expense recorded in the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025,
with respect to equity-based compensation granted to the senior officer. For details regarding the Company's equity compensation plans,
see Note 19 to our Audited Financial Statements. |
|
Senior
officer |
Employment
terms | |
|
(4) |
Elad Aharonson |
On March 6, 2025, our shareholders approved
Mr. Aharonson’s compensation terms as our new President and Chief Executive Officer, following approvals by the HR & Compensation
Committee on December 31, 2024 and January 6, 2025, and by the Board of Directors on January 9, 2025. Mr. Aharonson’s compensation
terms, as of December 31, 2025 (and effective as of March 13, 2025, the date of his commencement of service as President and Chief Executive
Officer), were as follows:
• Annual
base salary:
-
An annual gross base salary of NIS 2,875,560 (approximately
$901,429), adjusted for increases in the CPI since March 6, 2025.
-
Perquisites:
In accordance with the Company's Compensation Policy, the CEO's perquisites for the reporting period totaled ~NIS 0.31 million (approximately
$97,563). This amount includes provisions for a company car and related gross-ups, reimbursement of telephone expenses, communication
allowances (such as newspaper), and meal allowances, and does not include any social benefit-related compensation or customary social
related provisions such as pension payments.
• STI
award – Annual Bonus:
-
The target STI is equal to 12 monthly base salaries.
-
The maximum STI payout per year may not exceed 15 monthly base
salaries annually.
-
For details regarding Mr. Aharonson’s STI performance
and payout in 2025, see below “Short-Term Incentive Annual Bonus Component”.
• LTI
award – Equity:
-
An LTI (equity) in the value of NIS 5.52 million (approximately
$1.73 million) per vesting annum. The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for
Mr. Aharonson’s LTI in the Company’s 2025 Financial Statements. For details regarding Mr. Aharonson 's equity-based compensation
grants, see Note 19 to our Audited Financial Statements.
• Termination
arrangements:
-
12-months advance notice period in any case of termination of
employment (excluding termination of employment by the Company for cause).
• Other
Benefits:
-
Additional cash and non-cash benefits similar to those payable
to senior executives of the Company pursuant to policies in effect from time to time, including but not limited to, welfare, pension including
severance pay, education fund, life insurance (risk), health insurance, accidents insurance, work disability insurance, birthday and holiday
gifts, vacation days per year (and redemption of accrued vacation days), sick days quota, recuperation days, annual medical examination,
professional association membership fees, meals allowance or its equivalent, newspaper allowance, cellular phone and company car, including
gross up, and expenses reimbursement.
-
Entitlement to the exemption, insurance and indemnification
arrangements as customary in the Company.
-
All components of Mr. Aharonson’s compensation, including
base salary, STI awards and LTI entitlement, will be adjusted periodically in accordance with increases in the CPI, subject to the maximum
amounts for each compensation component as set forth in the Compensation Policy.
|
|
Senior officer |
Employment
terms | |
|
(4) |
Elad Aharonson |
The compensation terms of Mr. Aharonson in
his previous role as President, Growing Solutions Division, from the beginning of 2025 until the date he commenced service as ICL President
and CEO on March 12,2025, were as follows:
• Monthly
base salary: ~NIS 129,000 (approximately $40,439), adjusted for increases in the CPI.
• STI:
Target STI of 75% of the annual base salary. For details regarding Mr. Aharonson’s STI performance and payout in 2025, see below
“Short-Term Incentive Annual Bonus Component”.
• LTI:
The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for Mr. Aharonson’s LTI in the
Company’s 2025 Financial Statements.
• Termination
arrangements: Advance notice period of 6 months.
All other benefits customary
in the Company, such as regular provisions for pension and severance, education fund, disability insurance, Company car, gross up, as
well as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders. |
|
(5) |
Yoav Doppelt |
• For
details regarding Mr. Doppelt’s compensation terms as our Executive Chairman of the Board, see above ‘Executive Chairman of
the Board’s Compensation’, as well as ‘Short-Term Incentive (Annual Bonus) Component’ below. |
|
(6) |
Uri Perelman |
• Monthly
base salary: ~NIS 93,000 (approximately $29,000), as of December 31, 2025, adjusted for increases in the CPI. [Annual base salary
- $350k]
• STI:
Target STI of 75% of the annual base salary. For details regarding Mr. Perelman’s STI performance and payout in 2025, see below
“Short-Term Incentive Annual Bonus Component”.
• Sign-on
Bonus: Upon his commencement of employment with ICL on December 8, 2023, Mr. Uri Perelman was granted a sign‑on
bonus of ~NIS 2.4 million ($750,000), as approved by the HR & Committee and Board of Directors, to be paid in two equal installments
of $ 375,000 each. The first installment, subject to Mr. Perelman’s continued active employment through December 31, 2025, has already
vested and the second installment is subject to his continued employment through December 31, 2026.
• LTI:
The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for Mr. Perelman’s LTI in the Company’s
2025 Financial Statements.
• All
other benefits customary in the Company, such as regular provisions for health, retirement and severance, disability arrangement, as well
as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders. |
|
(7) |
Aviram Lahav |
• Monthly
base salary: ~NIS 128,000 (approximately $40,125), as of December 31, 2025, adjusted for increases in the CPI.
• 2025
STI: Target STI of 75% of the annual base salary. For details regarding Mr. Lahav’s STI performance and payout in 2025, see
below "Short-Term Incentive Annual Bonus Component".
• LTI:
The equity-based compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense that was recognized for Mr. Lahav’s LTI in the Company’s
2025 Financial Statements. |
|
Senior officer |
Employment
terms | |
|
(7) |
Aviram Lahav |
• Termination
arrangements: 6-months advance notice period in case of termination by the Company (not for cause) or 3-months advance notice in
case of resignation.
• All
other benefits customary in the Company, such as regular provisions for pension and severance, education fund, disability insurance, Company
car, gross up, as well as the exemption, insurance and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders. In
addition, payments related to non‑competition and confidentiality undertakings.
|
|
(8) |
Raviv Zoller |
Mr. Raviv Zoller ceased to serve as our President
and CEO on March 12, 2025. His compensation terms up to his departure in November 2025, were as follows:
• Base
salary:
-
Annual base salary of ~NIS 3.3 million (approximately $1 million)
-
Monthly base salary of ~NIS 276,000 (approximately $86,500).
-
In accordance with the Company's Compensation Policy, Mr. Zoller’s
perquisites as CEO for the reporting period totaled ~NIS 0.25 million (approximately $76,600). This amount included provisions for a company
car and related gross-ups, reimbursement of telephone expenses, communication allowances (as newspaper), and meal allowances, and does
not include any social benefit-related compensation or customary social related provisions such as pension payments.
• STI
– Annual Bonus: Target STI of ~NIS 3.5 million (approximately $1 million), and maximum STI payout of ~NIS 4.56 million (approximately
$1.4 million). For information regarding Mr. Zoller’s STI formula, performance and payout in 2025, see below “Short-Term Incentive
- The Annual Bonus Component”.
• LTI
– Equity: Entitlement to an annual LTI (equity award) at a value of NIS 5.5 million (approximately $1.69 million). The equity-based
compensation amount in the above table reflects the expense recognized for Mr. Zoller’s LTI in the Company’s 2025 Financial
Statements. For details regarding Mr. Zoller's equity-based compensation grants, see Note 19 to our Audited Financial Statements;
• Termination
arrangements:
-
12-months advance notice period in case of termination by the
Company (not for cause) or 6-months advance notice in case of resignation;
-
Additional severance equal to the last base salary multiplied
by the number of years that Mr. Zoller served as ICL’s President & CEO.
-
Upon termination of employment, Mr. Zoller received payment
in lieu of 12 months' advance notice, as well as an additional severance payment, in addition to the regular severance pay, for each year
of his employment (including the 12 months’ advance notice period).
• CPI
adjustment: In accordance with Mr. Zoller’s Employment Agreement, all compensation items under Mr. Zoller’s Employment
Agreement were adjusted for increases in the CPI.
• Other
benefits: All other cash and non-cash benefits payable to our senior executives pursuant to our policies in effect from time to
time, including but not limited to, pension, education fund, disability insurance, Company car, gross up, as well as the exemption, insurance
and indemnification arrangements applying to the Company’s office holders. |
| • |
The target STI (“STI Target”) for the CEO represents
the payout amount for achieving a 100% performance level (i.e., meeting 100% of all targets) in a given year. The STI Target for the CEO
for any given fiscal year shall not exceed 120% of the CEO’s annual base salary. |
| • |
80% of the CEO's STI Target will be measured against the performance
level of annual measurable financial and measurable non-financial goals determined by the HR & Compensation Committee and the Board
of Directors at the beginning of each fiscal year, as detailed in the Compensation Policy. |
| • |
Out of the measurable 80%
STI Target, between 50%-100% will be based on financial goals included in the
annual budget and the remaining measurable STI Target will be based on other measurable non-financial goals. The achievement level of
each goal, whether measurable financial goals or measurable non-financial goals, will be assessed independently of other goals, according
to the rating scale set forth in the Company’s Compensation Policy, and then translated into payout factors. The measurable financial
goals are calculated based on the figures from ICL's annual reports, as adjusted in accordance with the pre-defined profit adjustments
list in the Compensation Policy (the ”Predefined List”). |
| • |
If the actual performance of ICL’s operating income and/or
net income, as adjusted according to the Predefined List, does not meet the threshold performance level (60% of budget), there will be
no payout for the 80% portion of the STI award that is based on measurable financial and non-financial goals. |
| • |
The remaining 20% of the CEO's STI Target will be determined
based on a qualitative evaluation by the HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of the CEO's performance during the relevant
fiscal year after receiving a recommendation of the Executive Chairman. The maximum payout for this component cannot exceed three monthly
base salaries. |
| • |
The maximum STI payout for the CEO according to the Company's
Compensation Policy cannot exceed, for any given year, the lower of 130% of the CEO's STI Target for such year and $1.5 million.
|
| • |
Mr. Aharonson’s STI for 2025 was
calculated on a pro‑rata basis, reflecting the portion of the year during which he served as President of ICL Growing Solutions
Division through March 12, 2025, and the portion of the year during which he served as the Company’s President and CEO thereafter.
In his role as President and CEO, Mr. Aharonson’s target STI for a given year—representing the payout for achieving 100% of
his performance objectives—equals 12 monthly base salaries, while his maximum STI payout may not exceed 15 monthly base salaries.
In 2025, the Target STI was calculated on a prorated basis, as indicated above, and amounted to ILS 2,542,059 (approximately $797,000). |
| • |
For details regarding Mr. Aharonson’s STI performance and
payout in 2025, see ”Five-highest earners STI performance and payout in 2025” below. |
| • |
The STI Target for the CoB represents the payout amount for achieving
a 100% performance level (i.e., 100% of all targets) in a given year. The STI Target for the CoB for any given fiscal year may not exceed
120% of the CoB's annual base salary. |
| • |
Of the CoB's STI Targets for any given year, 30% will be based
on the performance level of ICL EBITDA; 30% on the performance level of ICL Operating Income; 20% on the performance level of ICL Net
Income, and 20% on the performance level of ICL’s Revenues. These goals will be derived from ICL’s budget for the relevant
fiscal year, and the achievement level of each goal will be assessed independently, according to the rating scale set forth in the Company's
Compensation Policy and then translated into payout factors. Such financial goals are calculated according to the figures from ICL's annual
reports, as adjusted in accordance with the Predefined List. |
| • |
If the actual performance of ICL’s operating income and/or
net income, as adjusted according to the Predefined List, does not meet the threshold performance level (60% of budget), no payout will
be made under the CoB STI plan. |
| • |
According to the Compensation Policy, the maximum STI payout
for the CoB shall not exceed, for any given fiscal year, the lower of 150% of the CoB's STI Target and $1 million. |
| • |
Mr. Doppelt’s STI Target for 2025, which was also his potential
maximum STI payout, was NIS 1,312,139 (approximately $411,329), after adjustment to the CPI. This 2025 STI Target was calculated on a
pro-rated basis, considering the STI Target until March 6, 2025, the date on which the shareholders' meeting approved the change in Mr.
Doppelt’ s compensation, and the revised STI target thereafter. |
| • |
Mr. Doppelt’s overall STI score for 2025, representing
the performance against the 2025 STI targets, was 103.8%. His resulting payout was NIS 1,312,139 (approximately $411,329), which represents
a 100% score and the maximum STI payment possible under his compensation terms. |
| • |
With respect to our Executive Officers, other than our CEO and
CoB, the Company's Compensation Policy provides that the annual bonuses may be calculated based on measurable financial metrics and/or
measurable non-financial metrics, as pre-determined by our HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, and/or determined based
on a qualitative evaluation. The HR & Compensation Committee and Board of Directors may determine, in any given year, that the STI
payout for such Executive Officers will be granted, in whole or in part, according to a qualitative evaluation of non-measurable items,
subject to the maximum STI payout set forth in the Compensation Policy and described below. |
| • |
The maximum STI payout for such Executive Officers, other than
the CEO and CoB, shall not exceed, for any given fiscal year, the lower of 225% of the Executive Officer’s STI Target for such year
and $1 million. |
| • |
For details regarding the STI performance and payout to the five
highest earning senior officers of ICL for 2025, see ‘Five-highest earners STI performance and payout in 2025' below. |
|
Executive
Office |
Annual
Base (1) |
STI
Target % |
STI
Target |
Overall
score of % target (3) |
2025
STI Payout |
|
Elad Aharonson(4)
|
NIS 2.62 million (~$0.82 million) |
100% |
NIS 2.54 million (~$0.8 million) |
107.23% |
NIS 2.73 million (~$0.86 million) |
|
Yoav Doppelt |
NIS 1.68 million (~$0.53million) |
NA(5)
|
NIS 1.31 million (~$0.41 million) |
103.8% |
NIS 1.31 million (~$0.41 million) |
|
Uri Perelman |
NIS 1.12 million (~$0.35 million) |
75% |
NIS 0.84 million (~$0.26 million) |
103.96% |
NIS 0.87 million (~$0.27million) |
|
Aviram Lahav |
NIS 1.54 million (~$0.48 million) |
75% |
NIS 1.15 million (~$0.36million) |
99.22% |
NIS 1.15 million (~$0.36 million) |
|
Raviv Zoller |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| (1) |
The Annual Base amounts are calculated based on the December
31, 2025 salary, multiplied by 12 months, translated into US dollars using the US dollar exchange rate in effect on December 31,2025.
|
| (2) |
The adjustments to the Company’s annual net and operating
income, as specified in “Item 5 – Financial Results and Business Overview– A. Operating Results", for purposes of calculating
the STI threshold and the measurable financials goals for the CEO and the CoB, adhere to the Predefined List in the Company's Compensation
Policy. |
| (3) |
For all executive officers, this column represents the weighted
percentage score of the measurable financial and non-financial goals (including ESG targets) and qualitative evaluation, as applicable.
|
| (4) |
The STI payout for 2025 reflects a pro‑rata calculation
based on Mr. Aharonson’s service in both roles during the year. For the period as President of the Growing Solutions division, the
STI payout was ~NIS 0.22 million (approximately $69,000) (96.53% of a target STI of ~NIS 0.23 million (approximately $72,000), representing
75% of an annual base salary of ~NIS 1.55 million (approximately $0.48 million)). For the period as Chief Executive Officer, the STI payout
was ~NIS 2.51 million (approximately $0.79 million) (108.27% of a target STI of ~NIS 2.32 (approximately $0.73 million), representing
100% of an annual base salary of ~NIS 2.88 million (approximately $0.9 million)). The combined STI payout for 2025 was ~NIS 2.73 (approximately
$0.86 million), reflecting 107.23% of a weighted STI target of ~NIS 2.54 million (approximately $0.8 million), based on a weighted annual
base salary of ~NIS 2.62 million (approximately $0.82 million). |
| (5) |
Mr. Doppelt’s STI Target for 2025 (which was also his maximum
potential STI payout) under his compensation terms was set at a nominal NIS 1.2 million (approximately $0.28 million) until March 6, 2025,
the date on which the shareholders' meeting approved the change in Mr. Doppelt’s compensation, and as of March 7, 2025, at NIS 1.34
million (approximately $0.41 million), linked to CPI adjustments. Mr. Doppelt’s 2025 STI Target of NIS 1.31 million was calculated
on a pro rata basis, reflecting the two periods described above. |
| • |
Identifying and addressing flaws in the business management of
the Company. |
| • |
Review and approve interested party transactions; determine criteria
for classification and approval of interested party transactions. |
| • |
Establishing whistleblower procedures. |
| • |
Overseeing the Company’s internal audit system and the
performance of its internal auditor. |
| • |
Appointment, compensation, oversight and scope of work assessment
of the Company’s independent accounting firm. |
| • |
Monitoring ICL’s financial statements and the effectiveness
of its internal controls. |
| • |
Ensure the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements and adherence to corporate governance best practices. |
| • |
Overseeing ICL’s risk management, including monitoring
the activities to manage and mitigate the identified risks. |
| • |
Recommending to the Board of Directors a policy governing the
compensation of officers and directors based on specific criteria. |
| • |
Recommending to the Board of Directors, from time to time, updates
to such compensation policy. |
| • |
Reviewing the implementation of such compensation policy.
|
| • |
Deciding whether to approve transactions with respect to terms
of office and employment of officers and directors (which require approval by the compensation committee under the Companies Law).
|
| • |
Approving, under certain circumstances, an exemption from shareholder
approval of the compensation terms of a candidate for chief executive officer (who meets certain non-affiliation criteria, in accordance
with the provisions of the Companies Law). |
| • |
Overseeing the Company’s bonus and equity plans.
|
| • |
Overseeing evaluation of top management and employees.
|
| • |
Overseeing succession planning. |
| • |
Overseeing ICL’s climate, sustainability, safety, environment
and water management related risks and opportunities, targets, policies and programs. |
| • |
Overseeing ICL’s community outreach programs, public relations
and advocacy. |
| • |
Overseeing diversity and inclusion aspects in the Company.
|
| • |
Overseeing ICL’s financing and equity management and operations,
including loans, equity offerings, hedging, debt and other financing vehicles. |
| • |
Overseeing ICL's preparedness for significant regulatory changes
expected in the coming years, including preparations related to the expiration of the Dead Sea concession and the processes for allocating
a new concession in 2030. |
|
Organ
Name |
Number
of Meetings in
Reported
Year |
Average
Attendance |
|
Board of Directors |
24 |
98% |
|
Audit & Accounting Committee |
10 |
98% |
|
Human Resources & Compensation Committee
|
10 |
100% |
|
Climate, Sustainability & Community Relations
Committee |
4 |
100% |
|
Financing Committee |
2 |
100% |
|
Regulatory Committee |
2 |
100% |
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
Phosphate Solutions |
3,751
|
3,765 |
3,970 |
|
Growing Solutions |
3,548
|
3,612 |
3,630 |
|
Potash |
1,995
|
2,063 |
2,092 |
|
Industrial Products |
1,568
|
1,605 |
1,615 |
|
Global functions and headquarters |
1,303
|
1,304
|
1,243
|
|
Sub Total |
12,165
|
12,349 |
12,550 |
|
Temporary employees |
842
|
718
|
800
|
|
Total employees |
13,007
|
13,067 |
13,350 |
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
Israel |
4,427
|
4,507 |
4,548 |
|
China |
1,942
|
1,938 |
1,984 |
|
Brazil |
1,505
|
1,580 |
1,637 |
|
Spain |
863
|
879 |
918 |
|
USA |
821
|
853 |
820 |
|
Germany |
699
|
686 |
704 |
|
UK |
698
|
693 |
705 |
|
Netherlands |
554
|
557 |
580 |
|
France |
123
|
124 |
126 |
|
All other |
533
|
532
|
528
|
|
Sub Total |
12,165
|
12,349 |
12,550 |
|
Temporary employees |
842
|
718
|
800
|
|
Total employees |
13,007
|
13,067 |
13,350 |
| • |
Bloomberg’s ESG Index |
| • |
Overall ESG Score: 5.57, with a percentile ranking of 93.7.
|
| • |
Environmental Score: 5.33, with a percentile ranking of 97.9.
|
| • |
Social Score: 3.96, with a percentile ranking of 70.5.
|
| • |
Governance Score: 7.84, with a percentile ranking of 96.8.
|
| • |
United Nations Global Compact |
| • |
Women’s Empowerment Principles (WEP)
|
| • |
33% females in senior leadership (T100) by the end of 2030 (in
2025, the percentage was 26% versus 25% in 2024). |
| • |
45% females on ICL’s Board of Directors by 2028 (in 2025,
the percentage was 33,33% versus 33.33% in 2024). |


|
Shareholders |
Ordinary
Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Special
State Share | ||
|
Number
|
%
|
Number
|
%
| |
|
Israel Corporation Ltd. (2)
|
567,018,587 |
43.93%** |
- |
- |
|
State of Israel (3)
|
- |
- |
1 |
100% |
|
The Phoenix Holdings Ltd. (4)
|
99,513,244 |
7.12% |
- |
- |
|
Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings
Ltd. (5) |
88,693,705 |
6.87% |
- |
- |
|
Harel Insurance Investments & Financial
Services Ltd. (6) |
67,769,160 |
5.25% |
- |
- |
|
Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd. (7)
|
65,339,816 |
5.03% |
- |
- |
|
Altshuler Shaham Ltd. (8)
|
64,691,143 |
5.01% |
- |
- |
|
Yoav Doppelt (9)
|
1,712,995 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Avisar Paz (10)
|
25,389 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Aviad Kaufman |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Sagi Kabla |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Lior Reitblatt (11)
|
62,092 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Reem Aminoach (12)
|
62,092 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Tzipi Ozer Armon (13)
|
24,331 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Gadi Lesin |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Miriam Haran (14)
|
53,289 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Dafna Gruber |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Michal Silverberg |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Shalom Shlomo |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Elad Aharonson (15)
|
2,657,905 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Aviram Lahav (16)
|
1,578,159 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Lilach Geva Harel (17)
|
1,305,243 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Ilana Fahima (18)
|
1,305,243 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Anantha Desikan (19)
|
858,793 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Amir Meshulam (20)
|
390,255 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Ilan Barkai (21)
|
157,593 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Nadav Turner (22)
|
973,302 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Nir Ilani |
- |
* |
- |
- |
|
Miri Mishor (23)
|
878,353 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Yaniv Kabalek (24)
|
767,457 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Uri Perelman (25)
|
749,697 |
* |
- |
- |
|
Maya Grinfeld |
- |
* |
- |
- |
| (1) |
The percentages shown are based on 1,290,672,729 ordinary shares
issued and outstanding as of March 10, 2026 (after excluding shares held by us or our subsidiaries). In accordance with SEC rules, beneficial
ownership includes voting or investment power with respect to securities and includes the shares issuable pursuant to options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 10, 2026. Shares issuable pursuant to options are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage
of the person holding such options but are not considered outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. |
| (2) |
Israel Corp. is a public company listed for trading on the Tel
Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE). Based on the information provided by Israel Corp., Millenium Investments Elad Ltd. (“Millenium”)
and Mr. Idan Ofer are considered as controlling shareholders jointly of Israel Corp., for purposes of the Israeli Securities Law (each
of Millenium and Mr. Idan Ofer hold shares in Israel Corp. directly, and Mr. Idan Ofer serves as a director of Millenium and has an indirect
interest in it as the beneficiary of the discretionary trust that has indirect control of Millenium, as stated below). As of December
31, 2025, Millenium holds approximately 38.28% of the issued share capital (and 38.65% of the voting rights) in Israel Corp., which held
as of December 31, 2025, approximately 43.93% of the voting rights and approximately
43.11% of the issued share capital, of the Company.
To the best of Israel Corp.’s knowledge, Millenium is wholly held by Mashat (Investments) Ltd. (“Mashat”).
Mashat is wholly owned by Ansonia Holdings Singapore B.V. (“Ansonia”) which is incorporated in the Netherlands. Ansonia is
a wholly owned subsidiary of Jelany Corporation N.V. (registered in Curaçao), which is wholly owned subsidiary of the Liberian company,
Court Investments Ltd. (“Court”). Court is wholly owned by a discretionary trust, in which Mr. Idan Ofer is the beneficiary.
In addition, as of December 31, 2025, Lynav Holdings Ltd. ("Lynav"), which is a company controlled by a discretionary trust in which Mr.
Idan Ofer is the beneficiary, held directly approximately 9.39% of the issued share capital (and 9.48% of the voting rights) of Israel
Corp.. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2025, Mr. Idan Ofer held directly approximately 0.05% of the issued share capital of Israel Corp
(and approximately 0.05% of the voting rights).
Even though Israel Corp. holds less than 50% of the Company’s ordinary shares, it still has decisive
influence at the general meetings of the Company’s shareholders and, effectively, it has the power to appoint directors (other than
the external directors) and to exert significant influence with respect to the composition of the Company’s Board of Directors.
As of December 31, 2025, approximately 73 million ordinary shares have been pledged by Israel Corp. to
secure certain liabilities, almost entirely comprised of margin loans with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $150 million.
|
| (3) |
For a description of the different voting rights held by the
holder of the Special State Share, see “Item 10 - Additional Information— B. Memorandum, Articles of Association and Special
State Share — The Special State Share.” |
| (4) |
Based solely upon and qualified in its entirety with reference
to a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Phoenix Holdings Ltd. (“Phoenix”), with the SEC on November 14, 2024. According to the Schedule
13G/A, the 99,513,244 Ordinary Shares reported therein are beneficially owned by various direct or indirect, majority or wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Phoenix (the “Phoenix Subsidiaries”). The Phoenix Subsidiaries manage their own funds and/or the funds of
others, including for holders of exchange-traded notes or various insurance policies, members of pension or provident funds, unit holders
of mutual funds, and portfolio management clients. Each of the Phoenix Subsidiaries operates under independent management and makes its
own independent voting and investment decisions. |
| (5) |
Based solely upon and qualified in its entirety with reference
to a Schedule 13G filed by Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings Ltd. (“Migdal”) with the SEC on November 13, 2025. According
to the Schedule 13G, of the 78,641,356 Ordinary Shares reported as beneficially owned by Migdal (i) 78,990,548 Ordinary Shares are held
for members of the public through, among others, provident funds, pension funds and insurance policies, which are managed by Migdal, and
(i) 9,703,157 Ordinary Shares are held for members of the public through mutual funds which are managed by Migdal. |
|
(6) |
Based solely upon and
qualified in its entirety by reference to a Schedule 13G filed by Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd. (“Harel”)
on March 4, 2026. According to the Schedule 13G, of the 67,769,160 Ordinary Shares reported as beneficially owned by Harel, (i) 66,221,913
Ordinary Shares are held for members of the public through, among others, provident funds and/or mutual funds and/or pension funds and/or
insurance policies and/or exchange traded funds, which are managed by subsidiaries of Harel, each of which subsidiaries operates under
independent management and makes independent voting and investment decisions, (ii) 700,557 Ordinary Shares are held by third-party client
accounts managed by a subsidiary of Harel as portfolio managers, which subsidiary operates under independent management and makes independent
investment decisions and has no voting power in the securities held in such client accounts, and (iii) 846,690 Ordinary Shares are beneficially
held for its own account. |
| (7) |
Based solely upon and qualified in its entirety with reference
to a Schedule 13G filed by Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd. (“Menora Holdings”) on November 19, 2025. According to the Schedule
13G, the securities reported are beneficially owned by Menora Holdings and by entities that are direct or indirect, wholly-owned or majority-owned,
subsidiaries of Menora Holdings (the "Subsidiaries"), such as Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd., Shomera Insurance Company Ltd., Menora
Mivtachim Pensions and Gemel Ltd., Menora Mivtachim Vehistadrut Hamehandesim Nihul Kupot Gemel Ltd., and Menora Mivtachim Investment Portfolio
Management Ltd. The economic interest or beneficial ownership in a portion of the securities covered by the report (including the right
to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, such securities) is held for the benefit
of insurance policy holders, the owners of portfolio accounts, or the members of the provident funds or pension funds, as the case may
be. |
| (8) |
Based solely upon and qualified in its entirety with reference
to a Schedule 13G filed by Altshuler Shaham Ltd. (“Altshuler”), with the SEC on January 17, 2023. According to the Schedule
13G, of the 64,691,143 Ordinary Shares reported as beneficially owned by Altshuler (i) 61,312,442 Ordinary Shares are held by provident
and pension funds managed by Altshuler Shaham Provident & Pension Funds Ltd., a majority-owned subsidiary of Altshuler, (ii) 3,378,701
Ordinary Shares are held by mutual funds managed by Altshuler Shaham Mutual Funds Management Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Altshuler;
and (iii) 263,100 Ordinary Shares are held by hedge funds managed by Altshuler Shaham Owl, Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Altshuler-Shaham.
Mr. Gilad Altshuler may be deemed to possess shared investment authority with respect to all of the foregoing Ordinary Shares due to his
indirect 44.81% interest in Altshuler-Shaham, as well as his serving in various investment management capacities for Altshuler-Shaham
and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The foregoing provident and pension funds, mutual funds and hedge funds, are managed for the benefit
of public investors and not for the economic benefit of the foregoing reporting persons. Each of the foregoing reporting persons lack
authority with respect to the voting of all of such Ordinary Shares. |
| (9) |
Includes 1,712,995 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (10) |
Includes 25,389 ordinary shares. |
| (11) |
Includes 62,092 ordinary shares. |
| (12) |
Includes 62,092 ordinary shares. |
| (13) |
Includes 24,331 ordinary shares. |
| (14) |
Includes 53,289 ordinary shares. |
| (15) |
Includes 2,657,905 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (16) |
Includes 1,578,159 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (17) |
Includes 1,305,243 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (18) |
Includes 1,305,243 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (19) |
Includes 858,793 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (20) |
Includes 390,255 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (21) |
Includes 157,593 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (22) |
Includes 27,744 ordinary shares and 945,558 ordinary shares subject
to options that are currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (23) |
Includes 878,353 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (24) |
Includes 767,457 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| (25) |
Includes 749,697 ordinary shares subject to options that are
currently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table. |
| • |
The composition of our Board of Directors (other than external
directors, as described under “Item 6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees— C. Board Practices— External Directors”);
|
| • |
Mergers or other business combinations; |
| • |
Certain future issuances of ordinary shares or other securities;
and |
| • |
Amendments to our Articles of Association, excluding provisions
of the Articles of Association that were determined by the Special State Share. |
|
For
the year ended December 31 | |||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
| |
|
Sales |
-
|
- |
1 |
|
Cost of sales |
-
|
1 |
1 |
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses
|
-
|
9 |
6 |
|
Financing income, net |
(2)
|
(2) |
(1) |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
1
|
1 |
1 |
|
As
of December 31 | ||
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
| |
|
Other current assets |
46
|
41 |
|
Other current liabilities |
-
|
1 |
| A. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
| A. |
Following the Israeli Supreme Court ruling requiring Dead Sea
Works to pay water fees starting in 2018 for water extracted from wells in the concession area, in December 2025, the Company was served
with a motion for discovery of documents filed with the Tel Aviv District Court by a shareholder of the Company (hereinafter – the
Applicant), as a preliminary proceeding in preparation for a possible derivative action against officers and directors of the Company.
According to the Applicant, the requested documents could potentially serve as a basis for a restitution claim relating to compensation
paid to such officers. Given the preliminary stage of the proceedings, it is not possible to assess their outcome. Nevertheless, an initial
review of the motion indicates that it is based on an incorrect premise. |
| B. |
In May 2018, the Company was served with a motion for discovery
and inspection of documents (hereinafter – the "Motion"), filed with the Tel Aviv District Court by a shareholder of the Company
(hereinafter – the "Movant"), as a preliminary proceeding in preparation for the possible filing of an application for certification
of a multiple derivative action against officers of the Company and ICL Rotem who, according to the Movant, caused the alleged damages
incurred and to be incurred by the Company as a result of the environmental incident in the Ashalim creek area in Israel’s Negev
region. In 2018, the parties reached an arrangement, pursuant to which the legal proceedings would be postponed until the relevant investigation
materials are provided to the Company by the investigating authority. As of the date of this report, to the best of the Company's knowledge,
the criminal investigation is still pending. In accordance with the Court's directive, the parties are required to update, from time to
time, on developments concerning the settlement agreement for the purpose of determining the continuation of the proceedings. Certain
NPO having its request to join the proceedings as an amicus curia is still pending in court, has filed requests to renew the proceedings
in the case. No resolution has been given yet. Considering the proceedings are at an early stage and are currently suspended, it is difficult
to estimate their outcome. |
![]() |
To preserve the character of the Company and its subsidiaries,
ICL Dead Sea, ICL Rotem, Dead Sea Bromine Company, Bromine Compounds and Tami, as Israeli companies whose centers of business and management
are in Israel. In our estimation, this condition is met. |
![]() |
To monitor the control over minerals and natural resources, for
purposes of their efficient development and utilization, including maximum utilization in Israel of the results of investments, research
and development. |
![]() |
To prevent acquisition of a position of influence in the Company
or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries by hostile entities or entities likely to harm the foreign and security interests of the State of
Israel. |
![]() |
To prevent acquisition of a position of influence in the Company
or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries or management of such companies, whereby such acquisition or management may create a situation of
significant conflicts of interest likely to harm any of the vital interests enumerated above. |
| • |
certain financial institutions;
|
| • |
dealers or traders in securities that use a mark-to-market method
of tax accounting; |
| • |
persons holding ordinary shares as part of a “straddle”
or integrated transaction or persons entering into a constructive sale with respect to the ordinary shares;
|
| • |
persons whose functional currency for US federal income tax purposes
is not the US dollar; |
| • |
entities classified as partnerships for US federal income tax
purposes; |
| • |
tax exempt entities, “individual retirement accounts”
or “Roth IRAs": |
| • |
persons who acquired our ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise
of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation; |
| • |
persons that own or are deemed to own 10% or more of our stock
by vote or value; or |
| • |
persons holding our ordinary shares in connection with a trade
or business conducted outside of the US. |
| • |
a citizen or individual resident of the US;
|
| • |
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created
or organized in or under the laws of the US, any state therein or the District of Columbia; or |
| • |
an estate or trust the income of which is subject to US federal
income taxation regardless of its source. |
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
USD/NIS |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of 5% |
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
1.4 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Trade receivables |
(4.5) |
(2.4) |
49.5 |
2.6 |
5.5 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.8) |
(0.4) |
8.5 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
0.2 |
0.1 |
(1.8) |
(0.1) |
(0.2) |
|
Credit from banks and others |
2.9 |
1.5 |
(32.4) |
(1.7) |
(3.6) |
|
Trade payables |
47.7 |
25.0 |
(524.9) |
(27.6) |
(58.3) |
|
Other payables |
3.0 |
1.6 |
(33.3) |
(1.8) |
(3.7) |
|
Long-term loans |
8.5 |
4.5 |
(93.8) |
(4.9) |
(10.4) |
|
Fixed rate debentures |
38.3 |
20.0 |
(421.0) |
(22.2) |
(46.8) |
|
Options |
(4.3) |
(2.1)
|
2.1 |
3.7 |
7.3
|
|
Forward |
(66.5) |
(35.5) |
18.5 |
39.5 |
82.7 |
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting
|
(31.5) |
(16.5) |
21.0 |
18.2 |
38.5 |
|
Swap |
(43.5)
|
(23.0)
|
51.0
|
25.4
|
53.7
|
|
Total |
(50.6)
|
(27.3)
|
(955.2)
|
31.6
|
65.8
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
EUR/USD |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of
5%
|
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(7.4) |
(3.9) |
81.4 |
4.3 |
9.0 |
|
Short-term deposits and loans |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Trade receivables |
(22.5) |
(11.8) |
247.2 |
13.0 |
27.5 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(1.6) |
(0.8) |
17.8 |
0.9 |
2.0 |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.3) |
(0.2) |
3.7 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
11.1 |
5.8 |
(121.8) |
(6.4) |
(13.5) |
|
Trade payables |
21.7 |
11.3 |
(238.3) |
(12.5) |
(26.5) |
|
Other payables |
6.0 |
3.1 |
(65.9) |
(3.5) |
(7.3) |
|
Long-term loans from banks |
36.8 |
19.3 |
(404.7) |
(21.3) |
(45.0) |
|
Long-term loans with variable interest rates
|
21.8 |
11.4 |
(240.2) |
(12.6) |
(26.7) |
|
Options |
6.3 |
3.6 |
(1.1) |
(1.5) |
(4.5) |
|
Forward |
5.5
|
2.6
|
0.1
|
(2.4)
|
(4.5)
|
|
Total |
77.3
|
40.4
|
(721.0)
|
(41.8)
|
(89.0)
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
GBP/USD |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of
5%
|
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Trade receivables |
(3.8) |
(2.0) |
41.3 |
2.2 |
4.6 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.2) |
(0.1) |
2.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
1.1 |
0.6 |
(12.1) |
(0.6) |
(1.3) |
|
Trade payables |
2.1 |
1.1 |
(23.1) |
(1.2) |
(2.6) |
|
Other payables |
0.5 |
0.3 |
(5.4) |
(0.3) |
(0.6) |
|
Long-term loans |
1.1 |
0.6 |
(11.9) |
(0.6) |
(1.3) |
|
Options |
(0.7) |
(0.3) |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
|
Forward |
(0.5)
|
(0.2)
|
0.0
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
|
Total |
(0.5)
|
-
|
(7.5)
|
0.2
|
0.5
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
BRL/USD |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of
5%
|
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(5.6) |
(2.9) |
61.9 |
3.3 |
6.9 |
|
Trade receivables |
(31.2) |
(16.3) |
342.8 |
18.0 |
38.1 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.5) |
(0.3) |
5.8 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
Trade payables |
5.5 |
2.9 |
(60.0) |
(3.2) |
(6.7) |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.5) |
(0.3) |
6.0 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
|
Other payables |
1.4 |
0.7 |
(15.5) |
(0.8) |
(1.7) |
|
Long-term loans from banks |
1.7 |
0.9 |
(18.2) |
(1.0) |
(2.0) |
|
Forward |
4.0
|
2.1
|
0.6
|
(2.3)
|
(4.9)
|
|
Total |
(25.2)
|
(13.2)
|
323.4
|
14.6
|
31.0
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
CNY/USD |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of
5%
|
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(8.3) |
(4.4) |
91.6 |
4.8 |
10.2 |
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
(0.6) |
(0.3) |
6.5 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
|
Trade receivables |
(5.8) |
(3.0) |
63.5 |
3.3 |
7.1 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(0.2) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Trade payables |
6.2 |
3.2 |
(67.7) |
(3.6) |
(7.5) |
|
Other payables |
0.7 |
0.4 |
(8.2) |
(0.4) |
(0.9) |
|
Long-term loans (CNY) |
2.4
|
1.2
|
(26.1)
|
(1.4)
|
(2.9)
|
|
Total |
(5.4)
|
(2.9)
|
59.4
|
3.0
|
6.7
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
USD/NIS |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of 5% |
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
1.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Short-term deposits and loans |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Trade receivables |
(3.3) |
(1.7) |
36.7 |
1.9 |
4.1 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.4) |
(0.2) |
4.0 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
1.3 |
0.7 |
(14.8) |
(0.8) |
(1.6) |
|
Trade payables |
37.1 |
19.4 |
(407.9) |
(21.5) |
(45.3) |
|
Other payables |
2.9 |
1.5 |
(31.9) |
(1.7) |
(3.5) |
|
Long-term loans |
10.6 |
5.6 |
(116.8) |
(6.1) |
(13.0) |
|
Fixed rate debentures |
14.7 |
7.7 |
(161.3) |
(8.5) |
(17.9) |
|
Forward |
(65.8) |
(34.0) |
(1.1) |
39.7 |
82.7 |
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting
|
(31.0) |
(17.2) |
2.1 |
14.7 |
33.3 |
|
Swap |
(16.6)
|
(8.7)
|
(2.9)
|
9.5
|
20.6
|
|
Total |
(50.7)
|
(27.0)
|
(691.4)
|
27.5
|
60.1
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
EUR/USD |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of
5%
|
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(1.8) |
(1.0) |
20.3 |
1.1 |
2.3 |
|
Short-term deposits and loans |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Trade receivables |
(20.4) |
(10.7) |
224.4 |
11.8 |
24.9 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(1.6) |
(0.8) |
17.5 |
0.9 |
1.9 |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.4) |
(0.2) |
4.7 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
9.4 |
4.9 |
(103.9) |
(5.5) |
(11.5) |
|
Trade payables |
18.2 |
9.6 |
(200.6) |
(10.6) |
(22.3) |
|
Other payables |
4.7 |
2.5 |
(51.8) |
(2.7) |
(5.8) |
|
Long-term loans from banks |
27.3 |
14.3 |
(300.3) |
(15.8) |
(33.4) |
|
Long-term loans with variable interest rates
|
46.7 |
24.5 |
(513.7) |
(27.0) |
(57.1) |
|
Options |
2.2 |
0.3 |
1.4 |
(2.9) |
(4.4) |
|
Forward |
18.2
|
8.6
|
2.0
|
(7.9)
|
(15.1)
|
|
Total |
102.4
|
52.0
|
(899.2)
|
(58.4)
|
(119.9)
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
GBP/USD |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of
5%
|
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(0.8) |
(0.4) |
9.3 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
|
Trade receivables |
(3.6) |
(1.9) |
39.1 |
2.1 |
4.3 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.2) |
(0.1) |
1.9 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Credit from banks and others |
0.7 |
0.4 |
(7.9) |
(0.4) |
(0.9) |
|
Trade payables |
2.2 |
1.1 |
(24.0) |
(1.3) |
(2.7) |
|
Other payables |
0.5 |
0.3 |
(5.5) |
(0.3) |
(0.6) |
|
Long-term loans |
1.1 |
0.6 |
(11.9) |
(0.6) |
(1.3) |
|
Options |
(1.0) |
(0.5) |
(0.4) |
0.5 |
0.9 |
|
Forward |
(0.1)
|
(0.1)
|
(0.1)
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
|
Total |
(1.2)
|
(0.6)
|
0.5
|
0.7
|
1.0
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
BRL/USD |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of
5%
|
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(6.3) |
(3.3) |
68.9 |
3.6 |
7.7 |
|
Trade receivables |
(27.0) |
(14.1) |
296.9 |
15.6 |
33.0 |
|
Receivables and debit balances |
(0.5) |
(0.2) |
5.2 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
Trade payables |
9.4 |
4.9 |
(103.3) |
(5.4) |
(11.5) |
|
Long-term deposits and loans |
(0.5) |
(0.2) |
5.2 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
Other payables |
1.1 |
0.6 |
(12.6) |
(0.7) |
(1.4) |
|
Long-term loans from banks |
1.7 |
0.9 |
(18.5) |
(1.0) |
(2.1) |
|
Forward |
1.6
|
0.9
|
0.3
|
(1.0)
|
(2.0)
|
|
Total |
(20.5)
|
(10.5)
|
242.1
|
11.7
|
24.9
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
CNY/USD |
Increase
of 10% |
Increase
of
5%
|
Decrease
of 5% |
Decrease
of 10% | |
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
(13.7) |
(7.2) |
150.5 |
7.9 |
16.7 |
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
(0.5) |
(0.3) |
5.8 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
Trade receivables |
(7.3) |
(3.8) |
80.6 |
4.2 |
9.0 |
|
Trade payables |
5.5 |
2.9 |
(61.0) |
(3.2) |
(6.8) |
|
Other payables |
0.8 |
0.4 |
(8.6) |
(0.5) |
(1.0) |
|
Long-term loans (CNY) |
2.5
|
1.3
|
(27.6)
|
(1.5)
|
(3.1)
|
|
Total |
(12.7)
|
(6.7)
|
139.7
|
7.2
|
15.4
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
Increase
of
1%
|
Increase
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 1% | ||
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Fixed-USD interest debentures |
55.9 |
28.7 |
(831.1) |
(30.4) |
(62.5) |
|
NIS/USD swap |
27.7
|
14.1
|
51.0
|
(14.7)
|
(30.0)
|
|
Total |
83.6
|
42.8
|
(780.1)
|
(45.1)
|
(92.5)
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | |||
|
Increase
of
1%
|
Increase
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 1% | ||
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Fixed-USD interest debentures |
55.4 |
28.5 |
(787.8) |
(30.2) |
(62.3) |
|
NIS/USD swap |
12.7
|
6.4
|
(2.9)
|
(6.8)
|
(14.0)
|
|
Total |
68.1
|
34.9
|
(790.7)
|
(37.0)
|
(76.3)
|
|
Sensitivity to changes
in the shekel interest rate |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | ||
|
Increase
of
1%
|
Increase
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 1% | ||
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Fixed-interest long-term loan |
- |
- |
(93.8) |
- |
- |
|
Fixed rate debentures |
27.5 |
14.1 |
(421.0) |
(14.7) |
(30.0) |
|
NIS/USD swap |
(32.5)
|
(16.7)
|
51.0
|
17.5
|
35.8
|
|
Total |
(5.0)
|
(2.6)
|
(463.8)
|
2.8
|
5.8
|
|
Sensitivity to changes
in the shekel interest rate |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | ||
|
Increase
of
1%
|
Increase
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 1% | ||
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Fixed-interest long-term loan |
- |
- |
(116.8) |
- |
- |
|
Fixed rate debentures |
11.3 |
5.8 |
(161.3) |
(6.0) |
(12.4) |
|
NIS/USD swap |
(13.3)
|
(6.8)
|
(2.9)
|
7.1
|
14.8
|
|
Total |
(2.0)
|
(1.0)
|
(281.0)
|
1.1
|
2.4
|
|
Sensitivity to changes
in the Euro interest rate |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | ||
|
Increase
of
1%
|
Increase
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 1% | ||
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Long-term loans from banks and others
|
4.1 |
2.1 |
(459.5) |
(2.1) |
(4.3) |
|
Sensitivity to changes
in the Euro interest rate |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value |
Fair
value |
Increase
(decrease)
in
fair value | ||
|
Increase
of
1%
|
Increase
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 0.5% |
Decrease
of 1% | ||
|
Type of instrument
|
$ millions
| ||||
|
Long-term loans from banks and others
|
4.0 |
2.0 |
(271.3) |
(2.0) |
(4.1) |
| • |
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
| • |
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and |
| • |
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. |
|
2025
|
2024
| |
|
US$
thousands |
US$
thousands |
|
Audit fees(1)
|
4,392
|
4,356 |
|
Audit-related fees(2)
|
16
|
87 |
|
Tax fees(3)
|
1,304
|
1,651
|
|
Total |
5,712
|
6,094 |
| • |
Majority Independent
Board. Under Section 303A.01 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “LCM”), a US
domestic listed company, other than a controlled company, must have a majority of independent directors. |
| • |
Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee. Under Section 303A.04 of the LCM, a US domestic listed company,
other than a controlled company, must have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors. Our
controlling shareholder, Israel Corporation, has significant control over the appointment of our directors (other than external directors).
|
| • |
Equity Compensation
Plans. Under Section 303A.08 of the LCM, shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote
on all equity‑compensation plans and material revisions thereto, with certain limited exemptions as described therein. We follow
the requirements of the Companies Law, under which approval of equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto is within the
authority of our HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors. However, under the Companies Law, the award of any compensation
to directors, the Chief Executive Officer or a controlling shareholder or another person in which a controlling shareholder has a personal
interest, including the award of equity-based compensation, generally requires the approval of the compensation committee, the Board of
Directors and the shareholders, in that order. Under the Companies Law, the compensation of directors and officers is generally required
to comply with a shareholder‑approved compensation policy, which is required, among other things, to include a monetary cap on the
value of equity compensation that may be granted to any director or officer. |
| • |
Shareholder Approval
of Securities Issuances. Under Sections 312.03(b)(i) and 312.03(c) of the LCM, shareholder approval
is a prerequisite to (A) issuing ordinary shares, or securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares, to a director,
officer, a controlling shareholder or member of a control group or any other substantial security holder of the company that has an affiliated
person who is an officer or director of the company (each an ”active related party”), if the number of ordinary shares to
be issued exceeds either 1% of the number of ordinary shares or 1% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance, and (B) (1)
issuing ordinary shares, or securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares, if the ordinary share has, or will have upon
issuance, voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance or (2) the number of ordinary
shares to be issued is, or will be upon issuance, equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of ordinary shares before the issuance, respectively,
in each case subject to certain exceptions. We seek shareholder approval for all corporate actions requiring such approval in accordance
with the requirements of the Companies Law, which are different from the requirements for seeking shareholder approval under Sections 312.03(b)(i)
and 312.03(c) of the LCM. Under the Companies Law, shareholder approval is a prerequisite to any extraordinary transaction with a controlling
shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest. Under the Companies Law, shareholder approval is also a prerequisite
to a private placement of securities if it will cause a person to become a controlling shareholder or in case all of the following conditions
are met: |
| • |
The securities issued amount to 20% or more of the Company’s
outstanding voting rights before the issuance; |
| • |
Some or all of the consideration are other than cash or listed
securities, or the transaction is not on market terms; and |
| • |
The transaction will increase the relative holdings of a 5% shareholder
or will cause any person to become, as a result of the issuance, a 5% shareholder. |
| 97* | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
ICL Group Ltd. | |||
By: | /s/ Aviram Lahav | ||
Name: | Aviram Lahav | ||
Title: | Chief Financial Officer | ||
ICL Group Ltd. | |||
By: | /s/ Aya Landman | ||
Name: | Aya Landman | ||
Title: | VP, Chief Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary | ||

|
ICL Group Ltd
|
![]() |
|
Auditors' Report (PCAOB
|
F-2
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|

|
|
Somekh Chaikin
KPMG Millennium Tower
17 Ha'arba'a Street, PO Box 609
Tel Aviv 61006 Israel
|
Telephone
Fax
Internet
|
972 3 684 8000
972 3 684 8444
www.kpmg.co.il
|
|
2025
|
2024
|
||
|
Note
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Current assets
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
6
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other receivables
|
7
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|||
|
Deferred tax assets
|
15
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
10
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
11
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
9,16
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|||
|
Short-term debt
|
13
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions
|
17
|
|
|
|
Other payables
|
14
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|||
|
Long-term debt and debentures
|
13
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
15
|
|
|
|
Long-term employee liabilities
|
16
|
|
|
|
Long-term provisions and accruals
|
17
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
19
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
||
|
Note
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Sales
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
20
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Finance expenses, net
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on income
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to shareholders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to shareholders of the Company:
|
22
|
|||
|
Basic earnings per share (in dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (in dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding:
|
22
|
|||
|
Basic (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
Components of other comprehensive income that will be reclassified subsequently to net income
|
|||
|
Foreign currency translation differences
|
|
(
|
|
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to the statement of income
|
(
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of the change in fair value of cash flow hedges
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Tax relating to items that will be reclassified subsequently to net income
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
Components of other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to net income
|
|||
|
Actuarial gains from defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
Tax relating to items that will not be reclassified to net income
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to the non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
Non- controlling interests
|
Total equity
|
|||||||
|
Share capital
|
Share premium
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
Capital reserves
|
Treasury shares,
at cost |
Retained earnings
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|||
|
$ millions
|
|||||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2025
|
|||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2025
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
Non- controlling interests
|
Total equity
|
|||||||
|
Share capital
|
Share premium
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
Capital reserves
|
Treasury shares,
at cost |
Retained earnings
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|||
|
$ millions
|
|||||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2024
|
|||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the shareholders of the Company
|
Non- controlling interests
|
Total equity
|
|||||||
|
Share capital
|
Share premium
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
Capital reserves
|
Treasury shares,
at cost |
Retained earnings
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|||
|
$ millions
|
|||||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2023
|
|||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2023
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|||
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets impairment
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate, interest and derivative, net
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Change in provisions
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in inventories
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Change in trade receivables
|
(
|
|
|
|
Change in trade payables
|
|
|
(
|
|
Change in other receivables
|
(
|
|
|
|
Change in other payables
|
|
|
(
|
|
Net change in operating assets and liabilities
|
(
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refund
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|||
|
Proceeds (payments) from deposits, net
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Proceeds from divestiture of assets and businesses, net of transaction expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Payments from settlement of derivatives, net
|
(
|
|
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
|
|
Business combinations
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|||
|
Dividends paid to the Company's shareholders
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Receipts of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Receipts (repayments) of short-term debt, net
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Interest paid
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Receipts (payments) from transactions in derivatives
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Dividend paid to the non-controlling interests
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of the year
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the year
|
|
|
|
| A. |
The Reporting Entity
|
| B. |
Security situation in Israel
|
| C. |
Definitions
|
| 1. |
Subsidiary – a company over which the Company has control and the financial statements of which are fully consolidated with the Company's statements as part of the consolidated financial statements.
|
| 2. |
Investee company – a subsidiary, including a partnership or joint venture which is accounted for using the equity method.
|
| 3. |
Related party – As in IAS 24 (2009), “Related Party Disclosures”.
|
| A. |
Statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
|
| B. |
Functional and presentation currency
|
| C. |
Basis of measurement
|
| D. |
Operating cycle
|
| E. |
Use of estimates and judgment
|
|
Estimate
|
Principal assumptions
|
Possible effects
|
Reference
|
|
Concessions, permits and business licenses
|
Forecast of obtaining a new concessions, permits and business licenses which constitute the basis for the Company's continued operations and the Company's expectations regarding the holding of the operating assets until the end of their useful lives
|
Impact on the value of the operation, depreciation periods and residual values of related assets.
|
See Note 3 – Material Accounting Policies and Note 18 -Concessions.
|
|
Recoverable amount of a cash generating unit, among other things, containing goodwill
|
Expected cash-flow forecasts including estimates of mineral reserves, discount rate, market risk and the forecasted growth rate.
|
Change in impairment valuation.
|
See Note 12 - Impairment Testing.
|
|
Probability assessment of contingent and environmental liabilities including cost of waste removal/ restoration
|
Whether it is more likely than not that an outflow of economic resources will be required in respect of potential liabilities under the environmental protection laws and legal claims pending against ICL and the estimation of their amounts. The waste removal/ restoration obligations depend on the reliability of the estimates of future removal costs and interpretation of regulations.
|
A change in the Company's estimated provisions for a claim and/or environmental liability, including waste removal and restoration.
|
See Note 18 - Contingent Liabilities.
|
| A. |
Basis for Consolidation
|
| 1. |
Subsidiaries
|
| 2. |
Non-controlling interests
|
| B. |
Foreign Currency
|
| C. |
Financial Instruments
|
| 1. |
Non-derivative financial assets
|
| 2. |
Non-derivative financial liabilities
|
| C. |
Financial Instruments (cont'd)
|
| 3. |
Derivative financial instruments
|
| 4. |
CPI-linked assets and liabilities not measured at fair value
|
| 5. |
Share capital
|
| D. |
Property, plant and equipment
|
| 1. |
Recognition and measurement
|
| D. |
Property, plant and equipment (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Subsequent Costs (after initial recognition)
|
| 3. |
Depreciation
|
|
In Years
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Technical equipment and machinery (1)
|
|
|
Dikes and evaporating ponds (2)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
| E. |
Intangible Assets
|
| 1. |
Goodwill
|
| E. |
Intangible Assets (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Research and development
|
| 3. |
Amortization
|
|
In Years
|
|
|
Concessions and mining rights – over the remaining duration of the rights granted
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
Technology / patents
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
Computer applications
|
|
| F. |
Inventories
|
| G. |
Impairment
|
| 1. |
Non-derivative financial assets
|
| 2. |
Non-financial assets
|
| H. |
Employee Benefits
|
| 1. |
Defined contribution plans
|
| 2. |
Defined benefit plans
|
| 3. |
Early Retirement Payments
|
| 4. |
Short‑term benefits
|
| H. |
Employee Benefits (cont'd)
|
| 5. |
Share-based compensation
|
| I. |
Provisions
|
| 1. |
Provision for environmental costs
|
| 2. |
Site restoration
|
| 3. |
Legal claims
|
| J. |
Revenue Recognition
|
| 1. |
Identifying a contract
|
| J. |
Revenue Recognition (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Identifying a contract (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Identifying performance obligations
|
| 3. |
Determining the transaction price
|
| 4. |
Satisfaction of performance obligation
|
| 5. |
Payment terms
|
| K. |
Government grants
|
| L. |
Leases
|
| M. |
Financing Income and Expenses
|
| N. |
Taxes on Income
|
| O. |
Amendments to standards and interpretations that have not yet been adopted
|
| P. |
Reclassification
|
| A. |
Investments in equity securities
|
| B. |
Derivatives
|
| C. |
Liabilities in respect of debentures
|
| A. |
General
|
| 1. |
Information on operating segments
|
| A. |
General (cont’d)
|
| 1. |
Information on operating segments (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Segment capital investments
|
| 3. |
Inter–segment transfers and unallocated income (expenses)
|
| A. |
General (cont’d)
|
| 3. |
Inter–segment transfers and unallocated income (expenses) (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Operating segment data
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2025
|
|||||||
|
Sales to external parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Other expenses not allocated to the segments
|
(
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
|
||||||
|
Financing expenses, net
|
(
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures as part of business combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B. |
Operating segment data (cont'd)
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2024
|
|||||||
|
Sales to external parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Other expenses not allocated to the segments
|
(
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
|
||||||
|
Financing expenses, net
|
(
|
||||||
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees
|
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures as part of business combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B. |
Operating segment data (cont'd)
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2023
|
|||||||
|
Sales to external parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Other expenses not allocated to the segments
|
(
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
|
||||||
|
Financing expenses, net
|
(
|
||||||
|
Share in earnings of equity-accounted investees
|
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C. |
Information based on geographical location
|
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
||||
|
$
millions
|
% of
sales
|
$
millions
|
% of
sales
|
$
millions
|
% of
sales
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C. |
Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2025
|
|||||||
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2024
|
|||||||
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
| C. |
Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
|
|
Industrial Products
|
Potash
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
Growing Solutions
|
Other
Activities
|
Reconciliations
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
For the year ended December 31, 2023
|
|||||||
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
| C. |
Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany sales
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
North America
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany eliminations
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
| C. |
Information based on geographical location (cont'd)
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
|
Spare parts
|
|
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
|
|
Of which:
|
||
|
Non-current inventories - mainly raw materials (presented as non-current assets)
|
|
|
|
Current inventories
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Government institutions
|
|
|
|
Current tax assets
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
Receivables from equity-accounted investees sale
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. |
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
(
|
(
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
(
|
(
|
|
Equity
|
(
|
(
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income before depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
| B. |
Business Acquisition and Divestiture
|
| 1. |
In January 2026, the Company acquired
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Surplus in employees' defined benefit plans (1)
|
|
|
|
Non-current inventories
|
|
|
|
Derivative designated as a cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
Long term deposits
|
|
|
|
Receivables from equity-accounted investees sale
|
|
|
|
Investments in equity-accounted investees
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
See Note 16.
|
| A. |
Composition
|
|
Land and buildings
|
Technical equipment and machinery
|
Dikes and evaporating ponds (3)
|
Plants under construction (1)
|
Other
|
Right of use
asset (2)
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
Cost
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciated balance as of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The additions are presented net of items whose construction has been completed and therefore have been reclassified to other categories in “property, plant and equipment”.
|
| (2) |
The total additions were recorded against lease liabilities under IFRS 16.
|
| (3) |
Depreciation expenses allocation in the amount of $
|
| A. |
Composition (cont'd)
|
|
Land and buildings
|
Technical equipment and machinery
|
Dikes and evaporating ponds (3)
|
Plants under construction (1)
|
Other
|
Right of use asset (2)
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||||
|
Cost
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions in respect of business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions in respect of business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciated balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The additions are presented net of items for which construction has been completed and, accordingly, were reclassified to other categories in the “property, plant and equipment” section.
|
| (2) |
The total additions were recorded against lease liabilities (IFRS 16).
|
| (3) |
Depreciation expenses allocation in the amount of $
|
| A. |
Composition
|
|
Goodwill
|
Concessions and mining rights
|
Trademarks
|
Technology / patents
|
Customer relationships
|
Computer
application
|
Others
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||||||
|
Cost
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions in respect of business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reallocations (1)
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Amortized Balance as of December 31 ,2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Reallocation of $
|
| A. |
Composition (cont’d)
|
|
Goodwill
|
Concessions and mining rights
|
Trademarks
|
Technology / patents
|
Customer relationships
|
Computer
application
|
Others
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||||||
|
Cost
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions in respect of business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Amortized Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B. |
Total book value of intangible assets having defined useful lives and those having indefinite useful lives are as follows:
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Intangible assets having a defined useful life
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets having an indefinite useful life
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. |
Impairment testing for intangible assets with an indefinite useful life
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
||
|
Phosphate Solutions
|
|
|
|
Industrial Products
|
|
|
|
Growing Solutions
|
|
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. |
Impairment testing for intangible assets with an indefinite useful life (cont’d)
|
| B. |
Impairment testing for Property, Plant and Equipment
|
| 1. |
As part of the Company's comprehensive strategic review of its operations, and its efforts to focus its activities on strategic growth drivers and to optimize its core businesses, on November 11, 2025, the Company decided to discontinue its operations in the United States related to the establishment of a lithium iron phosphate (“LFP”) cathode active material production facility. In addition, in a joint decision with Shenzhen Dynanonic, the parties agreed to terminate the joint venture for the establishment of a similar facility in Spain.
|
| B. |
Impairment testing for Property, Plant and Equipment (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Following the Company’s comprehensive strategic review, including its assessment of future investments in low-synergy activities, and in light of challenges in product development and updated expectations regarding the timing and extent of market penetration for polyhalite, the Company performed an impairment assessment of its consolidated subsidiary Boulby, which conducts the polyhalite operations.
In estimating the recoverable amount as part of the impairment assessment, the Company applied the value‑in‑use methodology, which was calculated as the present value of the updated future cash flows expected to be generated from the polyhalite operations. Management engaged an independent third party to review and validate the underlying assumptions. |
| A. |
Composition
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
||
|
From financial institutions (1)
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of:
|
||
|
Debentures
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans from financial institutions
|
|
|
|
Lease Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-Term debt
|
|
|
|
Long- term debt and debentures
|
||
|
Long-term lease liability
|
|
|
|
Loans from financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable debentures
|
|
|
|
Non-marketable debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less – current maturities of:
|
||
|
Debentures
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans from financial institutions
|
|
|
|
Lease liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long- term debt and debentures
|
|
|
| (1) |
Including $
|
| (2) |
For further information, see Note 21.
|
| B. |
Yearly movement in Credit from Banks and Others (*)
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
|
|
Changes from financing cash flows
|
||
|
Receipt of long-term debts
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
(
|
(
|
|
Receipts (repayments) of short-term debt, net
|
|
(
|
|
Interest paid
|
(
|
(
|
|
Repayment from transaction in derivatives, net
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total net financing cash flows
|
|
(
|
|
Initial recognition of lease liability
|
|
|
|
Interest expenses
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates
|
|
(
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
(
|
|
|
Other changes
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31
|
|
|
| C. |
Sale of receivables under securitization transaction
|
| D. |
Information on material loans and debentures outstanding as of December 31, 2025(7):
|
|
Instrument type
|
Loan date
|
Original principal (millions)
|
Currency
|
Carrying amount
($ millions)
|
Interest rate (*)
|
Principal repayment date
|
Additional information
|
|
Debentures - Series F
|
May 2018, December 2020
|
|
US Dollar
|
|
|
|
(2), (3)
|
|
Debentures - Series G
|
January/May 2020, May 2025
|
|
Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
(annual installment)
|
(1), (3)
|
|
Debentures (private offering) – 3 series
|
January 2014
|
|
US Dollar
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Sustainability linked loan (SLL)
|
September 2021
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Loan - European Bank
|
June 2025
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
(Semi – Annual installment) |
|
| D. |
Information on material loans and debentures outstanding as of December 31, 2025: (cont’d)
|
|
| (1) |
In May 2025, the Company completed an expansion of its Series G debentures in Israel, in the amount of NIS
|
| (2) |
In May 2025, Fitch Ratings reaffirmed the Company’s long-term issuer default rating and senior unsecured rating at 'BBB-'. The outlook on the long-term issuer default rating is stable.
|
| (3) |
In July 2025, the S&P credit rating agency reaffirmed the Company’s international credit rating and senior unsecured rating of 'BBB-' with a stable rating outlook. In addition, the S&P Maalot credit rating agency reaffirmed the Company’s credit rating of 'ilAA' with a stable rating outlook.
|
| (4) |
The loan includes three sustainability performance targets: (1) an annual 4% to 5% reduction in direct and indirect Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2 emissions resulting from ICL global operations.
(2) Through 2025, the Company is committed to adding a significant number of Tfs (Together for Sustainability) qualified vendors each year who meet criteria of management, environment, health and safety, labor and human rights, ethics, and governance and (3) for female to hold at least
|
| (5) |
Subsequent to the date of the report, in January 2026, the Company repaid $
|
| (6) |
The principal will be repaid in consecutive,
|
| (7) |
As of December 31, 2025, the Company is in compliance with all its financial covenants set forth in its financing agreements. See item F below.
|
| E. |
Credit facilities:
|
|
Issuer
|
Group of international banks
|
|
Date of the credit facility
|
|
|
Date of credit facility termination
|
|
|
The amount of the credit facility
|
|
|
Credit facility has been utilized
|
EUR 210 million |
|
Interest rate
|
Up to 33% use of the credit: SOFR/Euribor + 0.69%.
From 33% to 66% use of the credit: SOFR/Euribor + 0.89%
66% or more use of the credit: SOFR/Euribor + 1.04%
|
|
Loan currency type
|
|
|
Pledges and restrictions
|
|
|
Non-utilization fee
|
|
|
(1)
|
In April 2023, the Company entered into a $
|
| (2) |
The Sustainability-Linked RCF includes three Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) which have been designed to align with ICL’s sustainability goals: a reduction in Absolute Scope 1 & 2 GHG Emissions; an increase in the percentage of female representation among senior ICL management; and an increase in the number of valid TfS (Together for Sustainability initiative) scorecards obtained for ICL Group suppliers. Each of these goals will be assessed regularly during the term of the Sustainability-Linked RCF through third-party verification of ICL’s performance in these areas.
|
| F. |
Restrictions on the Group relating to the receipt of credit
|
|
Financial Covenants (1)(2)
|
Financial Ratio Required under the Agreement
|
Financial Ratio December 31, 2025
|
|
Total shareholder's equity
|
Equity above $2,000 million
|
$
|
|
Ratio of EBITDA to the net interest expenses
|
Equal to or greater than 3.5
|
|
|
Ratio of the net financial debt to EBITDA
|
Less than 3.5
|
|
|
Ratio of certain subsidiaries loans to the total assets of the consolidated company
|
Less than 10%
|
|
| (1) |
The examination of compliance with the financial covenants is based on the Company's consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2025, the Company complies with all of its financial covenants.
|
| (2) |
The EBITDA calculation for the financial covenants, which amounted to $
|
| G. |
Pledges and Restrictions Placed in Respect of Liabilities
|
| (1) |
The Company has undertaken various obligations in respect of loans and credit lines from banks, including a negative pledge, whereby the Company committed, among other things, in favor of the lenders, to limit guarantees and indemnities to third parties (other than guarantees in respect of subsidiaries) up to an agreed amount of $
|
| (2) |
As of December 31, 2025, the total guarantees provided by the Company were in the amount of $
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Employees (1)
|
|
|
|
Current tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
Governmental (mainly in respect of royalties)
|
|
|
|
Income received in advance
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Including post-employment liabilities in the amount of $
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel
|
| 1. |
Income tax rate
|
| 2. |
Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (hereinafter – the Encouragement Law)
|
| a) |
Beneficiary Enterprises
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
|
|
| 2. |
Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (cont'd)
|
| a) |
Beneficiary Enterprise (cont'd)
|
| b) |
Preferred Enterprises
|
| 1) |
Preferred Enterprises located in Development Area A –
|
| 2) |
Preferred Enterprises located in the rest of the country –
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
|
|
| 3. |
The Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxation), 1969
|
| a) |
Some of the Company’s Israeli subsidiaries are “Industrial Enterprise”, as defined in the abovementioned law. In respect of buildings, machinery and equipment owned and used by any "Industrial Enterprise", the Company is entitled to claim accelerated depreciation as provided by the Income Tax Regulations – Adjustments for Inflation (Depreciation Rates), 1986 which allow accelerated depreciation to any "Industrial Enterprise" as of the tax year in which each asset is first placed in service.
|
| b) |
The Industrial Enterprises owned by some of the Company's Israeli subsidiaries have a common line of production or similar industrial branch activity and, therefore, they file, together with the Company, a consolidated tax return in accordance with Section 23 of the Law for the Encouragement of Industry. Accordingly, each of the said companies is entitled to offset its tax losses against the taxable income of the other companies.
|
| 4. |
Taxation of Profits Natural Resources
|
| 4.1 |
Royalties
|
| 4.2 |
Imposition of Surplus Profit Levy
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
|
|
| 4. |
Taxation of Profits Natural Resources (cont'd)
|
| 4.2 |
Imposition of Surplus Profit Levy: (cont'd)
|
| 1) |
Actual price in the sale transaction.
|
| 2) |
A price which will provide an operating profit for the bromine compounds manufacturer of
|
| 1) |
Actual price in the sale transaction.
|
| 2) |
A price which will keep an operating profit with the downstream products manufacturer of
|
| 3) |
The production and operating costs attributable to a unit of phosphate.
|
| A. |
Taxation of companies in Israel (cont'd)
|
| 4. |
Taxation of Profits Natural Resources (cont'd)
|
| 4.3 |
Corporate income Tax:
|
| B. |
Taxation of non-Israeli subsidiaries
|
|
Country
|
Tax rate
|
Note
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
(3)
|
|
United States
|
|
(1)
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
| (1) |
The tax rate is an estimated average and includes federal and states taxes. Different rates may apply in each year due to changes in the allocation of income among states.
|
| (2) |
In accordance with the legislation of BEPS Pillar 2, which entered into effect in 2024, there are several jurisdictions in which the Company operates where the local tax rate may require a supplement to a minimum taxation of 15%. This legislation has no material impact on the Company.
|
| (3) |
Starting in fiscal year 2028, the tax rate will be gradually reduced by 1% per year, reaching 24% in fiscal year 2032.
|
| C. |
Carried forward tax losses
|
| D. |
Tax assessment
|
| 1. |
Income Tax
|
| 2. |
Surplus Profit Levy (in Israel)
|
| E. |
Deferred income taxes
|
|
In respect of financial position
|
In respect
of carry forward tax losses
|
Total
|
||||
|
Depreciable property,
plant and equipment and intangible assets
|
Inventories
|
Provisions for employee benefits
|
Other
|
|||
|
$ millions
|
||||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Changes in 2024:
|
||||||
|
Amounts recorded in the statement of income
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recorded to a capital reserve
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Changes in 2025:
|
||||||
|
Amounts recorded in the statement of income
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
Amounts recorded to a capital reserve
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2025
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Israeli shekels
|
(
|
(
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
|
US dollar
|
|
|
|
British pound
|
|
|
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
| F. |
Taxes on income included in the income statements
|
| 1. |
Composition of income tax expenses (income)
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Current taxes (1)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Taxes in respect of prior years
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. |
Theoretical tax
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Income before taxes on income, as reported in the statements of income
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory tax rate (in Israel)
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretical tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
Add (less) – the tax effect of:
|
|||
|
Surplus Profit Levy tax
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced tax due to tax benefits
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Differences deriving from additional deduction and different tax rates applicable to foreign subsidiaries
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Tax on dividend
|
|
|
|
|
Deductible temporary differences and their reversal (including carryforward losses) for which deferred taxes assets were not recorded and non–deductible expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes in respect of prior years
|
|
|
(
|
|
Differences in measurement basis
|
|
|
|
|
Other differences
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on income included in the income statements
|
|
|
|
| G. |
Taxes on income relating to items recorded in equity
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Tax recorded in other comprehensive income
|
|||
|
Actuarial gains from defined benefit plan
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Change in fair value of hedging derivatives
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Taxes in respect of exchange rate differences on equity loan to a subsidiary included in translation adjustment
|
|
|
(
|
|
Total
|
(
|
|
(
|
| A. |
Composition
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
Termination benefits
|
(
|
(
|
|
Defined benefit obligation
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Equity instruments
|
||
|
With quoted market price
|
|
|
|
Without quoted market price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments
|
||
|
With quoted market price
|
|
|
|
Without quoted market price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with insurance companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B. |
Severance Pay
|
| 1. |
Israeli companies
|
| 2. |
Certain subsidiaries outside Israel
|
| C. |
Pension and Early Retirement
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
Some subsidiaries have signed plans with funds – including a pension fund for certain employees – under which the subsidiaries make current deposits to the fund. These deposits release the subsidiaries from their obligation to make pension payments under the labor agreements upon the employees’ retirement. The funded amounts are not reflected in the statements of financial position, as they are not under the subsidiaries' control and management.
|
| D. |
Post-employment retirement benefits
|
| E. |
Movement in net defined benefit obligation and in its components:
|
|
Fair value of plan assets (*)
|
Defined benefit obligation
|
Defined benefit obligation, net
|
||||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2025
|
2024
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Income (costs) included in profit or loss:
|
||||||
|
Current service costs
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Interest income (expenses)
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
Past service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of movements in exchange rates, net
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income:
|
||||||
|
Actuarial profits (losses) deriving from changes in financial assumptions
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
Other actuarial gains (losses)
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Change with respect to translation differences, net
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
Other movements:
|
||||||
|
Benefits received (paid)
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
| F. |
Actuarial assumptions
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Discount rate as of December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Future salary increases
|
|
|
|
|
Future pension increase
|
|
|
|
| G. |
Sensitivity analysis
|
|
December 2025
|
||||
|
Decrease
10%
|
Decrease
5%
|
Increase
5%
|
Increase
10%
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
Significant actuarial assumptions
|
||||
|
Salary increases
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Mortality table
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
| H. |
The Effect of the plans on the Company's future cash flows
|
| I. |
Long-term incentive plan
|
| (1) |
At the general meeting of shareholders held on March 6, 2025, the shareholders approved a new three-year equity grant for the years 2025-2027 to the CEO and the Chairman of the Board. The grant consists of about
|
| (2) |
In March and April 2025, the Company’s HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved a new triennial equity grant for the years 2025-2027 to two senior managers. The grant consists of
|
| I. |
Long-term incentive plan (cont'd)
|
| (3) |
In June 2025, Company's HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved a new Cash Long-Term Incentive (LTI) plan. Under this plan, certain senior managers will be awarded with a cash incentive of $
|
| (4) |
In July 2025, the Company’s HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved a new triennial equity grant for the years 2025-2027 to certain officers and senior managers. The grant consists of
|
| (5) |
In November 2025 and December 2025, the Company’s HR & Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, respectively, approved a new three-year equity grant for two senior executives. The grant consists of
|
| A. |
Composition and changes in the provision
|
|
Site restoration and equipment dismantling (1)
|
Legal claims
|
Other
|
Total
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions recorded during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions reversed during the year
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Payments during the year
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Main items under 'Site restoration and equipment dismantling':
|
| a. |
Spain – In 2018, a restoration plan was approved for the Suria and Sallent sites, which includes handling the salt piles and dismantling of facilities. The restoration plan at the Suria site is expected to continue until 2095, and at the Sallent site until 2072.
|
| b. |
ICL Rotem – as of December 31, 2025, according to the Company's estimation, the provision for the restoration of the mining sites and waste repositories, for ICL Rotem's operations, amounted to $
|
| c. |
Bromine Israel (Neot Hovav) – pursuant to the Ministry of Environmental Protection, the Company is required to treat both solid waste of past periods which is stored in a designated defined area on the site's premises, and currently-produced waste created during the ongoing production processes in the plant. Waste treatment is partly conducted through a hydro-bromine acid recovering facility (BRU), operated by the Company. Part of the waste is sent for external designated treatment. As of December 31, 2025, the provision for prior periods waste treatment amounted to $
|
| A. |
Commitments
|
| (1) |
Several of the Group’s subsidiaries have entered into agreements with suppliers for the purchase of raw materials and natural gas in the ordinary course of business for various periods ending in 2038. As of December 31, 2025, the total amount of the commitments is approximately $
|
| (2) |
Several of the Group’s subsidiaries have entered into agreements with suppliers for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment. As of December 31, 2025, the subsidiaries’ capital expenditures commitments total approximately $
|
| (3) |
As part of the collaboration between ICL's Spanish subsidiary, ICL Iberia, and the Government of Catalonia to advance environmental sustainability goals, the Company has committed to restoring salt piles at ICL Iberia’s sites, mainly through processing and removal via a dedicated collector to the sea. In 2021, the Company signed an agreement with the Catalan Water Agency for the construction and operation of this collector. Key elements of the agreement include, among other things, project management guidelines, financing aspects related to the project, project costs and a determination of an operational maintenance mechanism, including usage costs. In accordance with the agreement and based on the Company's assessment, its share of the project cost is expected to be approximately $
|
| (4) |
In 2017, the Company entered into a gas purchase agreement with Energean Israel Limited (Energean), which holds a license to develop the Karish and Tanin gas reservoirs off the shore of Israel. Pursuant to the agreement, Energean will supply the Company with up to 13 BCM of natural gas (NG), valued at $
|
| (5) |
The Articles of Association of the Company and its Israeli subsidiaries include provisions that permit exemption, indemnification and insurance of liability of officers and directors, all in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law.
|
| A. |
Commitments (cont'd)
|
| (5) |
(cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions
|
| (1) |
Dead Sea Works Ltd. (hereinafter – DSW)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
DSW (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (2) | Rotem Amfert Israel (hereinafter – “ICL Rotem”) |
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (2) | ICL Rotem (cont'd) |
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (2) |
ICL Rotem (cont'd)
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (2) |
ICL Rotem (cont'd)
|
| • |
Emission Permit - In January 2024, a new emission permit was issued to ICL Rotem under the Israeli Clean Air Act (hereinafter - the Law) valid until January 2031. The Company is in active discussions with Israel’s Ministry of Environmental Protection (MoEP) to assure adherence to all conditions outlined in the permit, including those specified in an administrative order under Section 45 of the Law, and to achieve satisfactory resolutions to notable timeline execution challenges for a limited number of projects.
|
| • |
Phosphogypsum storage - In 2021, a new Urban Building Plan was approved (the 2021 plan), the main objectives of which are to regulate areas for phosphogypsum storage reservoirs.
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (3) |
ICL Iberia – a subsidiary in Spain
|
| (4) |
United Kingdom
|
| A. |
ICL Boulby, ICL's subsidiary in the UK, holds onshore and offshore mineral leases and licenses that allow for the extraction of various minerals, along with numerous easements and rights of way from private landowners. The offshore mineral field is leased from The Crown Estate on a production royalty basis and includes provisions for the exploration and exploitation of all targeted and known polyhalite and salt mineral resources of interest to ICL Boulby.
|
| B. |
Concessions (cont'd)
|
| (4) |
United Kingdom (cont'd)
|
| A. |
(cont'd)
|
| B. |
A UK subsidiary within the Growing Solutions segment (hereinafter – Everris Limited) owns peat mines in the UK (Creca, Nutberry, and Douglas Water). Peat is used as a component in the production of professional growing media. The extraction permits for Creca site are valid until the end of 2051, and the site is currently operational. However, mining activity at the Nutberry and Douglas Water sites ceased in 2024, following the expiration of their respective permits. Restoration activities at these sites have commenced and are currently ongoing.
|
| (5) |
YPH - China
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities
|
| (1) |
Ecology
|
| A. |
In June 2022, an unexpected flow of brine was discovered above ground at the outskirts of an alluvial fan area, which, according to initial assessment by the Company, appears to have resulted from a combination of seepage from the feeder canal of ICL Dead Sea’s pumping station P-9 (hereinafter - P-9) and unique ground conditions, which, according to the Company's estimation, does not exceed the approved design specifications of P-9. The Company installed sealing sheets over an approximately 2km long section of the 15km feeder canal in the area of the fan, according to the instruction of Israel's Nature and Parks Authority. The Company is in discussions with the MoEP regarding the implementation of the remaining corrective requirements.
|
| B. |
In 2017, the Israeli Water Law was amended, according to which saline water of the kind produced for Dead Sea plants by the Company's own water drilling is charged with water fees. In October 2021, following the Company’s objection to the imposition of water fees for drilling within the concession area, the Water Authority informed the Company that such fees would not apply. This decision was based on the legal opinion issued by the Israeli Ministry of Justice (the Opinion), according to which the royalties arrangement established in the Dead Sea Concession Law, 5771-1961, constitutes the exclusive legal framework for payment in connection with water extraction in the concession area, and that imposing additional water fees beyond the royalties is not legally permissible. In September 2022, two petitions were filed with the Supreme Court of Israel by certain non-profit organizations against the Water Authority, Israel’s Attorney General, the Ministry of Justice, Mekorot Water Company Ltd. and the Company.
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
Ecology (cont'd)
|
| C. |
In 2021, a decision was rendered by the Israel Water Authority, despite the Company's objection, that the Company's status should be changed to a "Consumer-Producer", as defined in the Water Law, commencing with the Water Authority's production license, issued to the Company for 2021. In December 2023, after the Company’s appeal was rejected by the Water Court, the Company appealed against this decision to the Supreme Court. Following the Israel Water Authority's response to the appeal, a hearing was set for March 2026. The Company has made sufficient provision in its financial statements.
|
| D. |
In 2020, an application for a class action (the Application) was filed in the Beer Sheva District Court in Israel against the Company, the Company's subsidiary, ICL Rotem, and certain of the Company's present and past officeholders, by a number of local residents in the Arava region in the south of Israel (hereinafter – the Applicants). The Applicants claim that discharge, leakage and seepage of wastewater from ICL's Zin site allegedly caused various environmental hazards to the Zin stream, which resulted in damage to various groups in Israel’s population, including: the Israeli public as the Zin stream property owners; those who avoided visiting Zin stream due to the environmental hazards; visitors of Zin stream who were exposed to the aforementioned hazards and the residents of the area near Zin stream who were affected by the hazards. Accordingly, the Applicants request several remedies, including restitution and compensation for the damage that they claim was caused to the various groups in a minimum amount of NIS
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
Ecology (cont'd)
|
| E. |
In July 2019, an application for approval of a claim as a class action was submitted to the Jerusalem District Court by an Israeli environmental association (hereafter - the Applicant) against 30 defendants, including Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company (hereinafter – the Respondents). The application includes claims relating to air pollution in Haifa Bay (located in northern Israel) and to alleged illness therefrom to the population of the said area.
|
| F. |
In 2018, an application for certification of a claim as a class action was filed with the Be’er Sheva District Court by two groups: the first class constituting the entire public of the State of Israel and the second-class constituting visitors to the Bokek stream and the Dead Sea (hereinafter – the Applicants), against the Company’s subsidiaries, ICL Rotem and Periclase Dead Sea Ltd. (hereinafter – the Respondents).
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| (1) |
Ecology (cont'd)
|
| F. |
(cont'd)
|
| G. |
In 2015, a request for certification of a claim as a class action was filed with the Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court against eleven defendants, including the subsidiary Fertilizers and Chemical Ltd., in respect of claims relating to air pollution in Haifa Bay and the alleged harm caused to its residents. The amount of the claim was about NIS
|
| (2) |
Increase in the level of the evaporation pond in Sodom (hereinafter – Pond 5)
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| (2) |
Pond 5 (cont'd)
|
| (3) |
In connection with the Harmonization Project (to create one global ERP system) which was discontinued in 2016 by a decision of the Company's Board of Directors, in December 2018, the Company filed a lawsuit in the Tel Aviv District Court against IBM Israel, the leading project provider (hereinafter – IBM), in the amount of $
|
| C. |
Contingent liabilities (cont'd)
|
| (3) |
(cont'd)
|
| (4) |
In addition to the contingent liabilities, as stated above, as of the reporting date the contingent liabilities regarding the matters of environmental protection and legal claims which are pending against the Group are in immaterial amounts. It is noted that part of the above claims is covered by insurance. According to the Company’s estimation, the provisions recognized in its financial statements are sufficient.
|
| A. |
Composition:
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|||
|
Authorized
|
Issued and paid
|
Authorized
|
Issued and paid
|
|
|
Number of ordinary shares of Israeli Shekel 1 par value (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Special State shares of Israeli Shekel 1 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Outstanding Shares (in millions)
|
|
As of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
|
| B. |
Rights conferred by the shares
|
| (1) |
The ordinary shares grant their holders voting rights in General Meetings of the Company, the right to participate in shareholders’ meetings, the right to receive dividends, and the right to a share in excess assets upon liquidation of ICL.
|
| (2) |
The Special State of Israel Share, is held by the State of Israel for the purpose of monitoring matters of vital interest to the State of Israel, grants special rights to make decisions, among other things, on the following matters:
|
| - |
Sale or transfer of company assets, which are “essential” to the State of Israel, not in the ordinary course of business.
|
| - |
Voluntary liquidation, change or reorganization of the organizational structure of ICL or merger (excluding mergers of entities controlled by ICL, directly or indirectly, that would not impair the rights or power of the Government, as holder of the Special State Share).
|
| - |
Any acquisition or holding of
|
| - |
The acquisition or holding of
|
| - |
Any percentage of holding of the Company’s shares, which grants its holder the right, ability or actual possibility to appoint, directly or indirectly, such number of the Company’s directors equal to half or more of the Company’s directors appointed.
|
| C. |
Share-based payments
|
| 1. |
Non-marketable options
|
|
Grant date
|
Employees entitled
|
Number of instruments (thousands)
|
Issuance's details
|
Instrument terms
|
Vesting conditions
|
Expiration date
|
|
February 14, 2017
|
Former CEO
|
|
|
|
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
|
|
|
June 20, 2017
|
Officers and senior employees
|
|
|
|||
|
August 2, 2017
|
Former chairman of BOD
|
|
||||
|
March 6, 2018
|
Officers and senior employees
|
|
|
|||
|
May 14, 2018
|
CEO
|
|
|
|||
|
August 20, 2018
|
Former chairman of BOD
|
|
|
|||
|
April 15, 2019
|
Officers and senior manager
|
|
2 equal tranches:
(1) half at the end of 24 months after the grant date.
(2) half at the end of 36 months after the grant date.
|
|
||
|
June 27, 2019
|
CEO
|
|
||||
|
May 29, 2019 *
|
Chairman of BOD
|
|
||||
|
June 30, 2021
|
Senior employees
|
|
||||
|
February 8, 2022
|
Senior employees
|
|
3 equal tranches:
(1) one third at the end of 12 months after the grant date
(2) one third at the end of 24 months after the grant date
(3) one third at the end of 36 months after the grant date
|
|||
|
March 30, 2022
|
CEO
|
|
||||
|
March 30, 2022
|
Chairman of BOD
|
|
||||
|
February 14, 2023
|
Senior managers
|
|
||||
|
April 4, 2024
|
Officers and senior managers
|
|
||||
|
March 6, 2025
|
Chairman of BOD
|
|
||||
|
March 13, 2025
|
CEO
|
|
||||
|
April 1, 2025
|
Senior manager
|
|
||||
|
May 1, 2025
|
Senior manager
|
|
||||
|
July 6, 2025
|
Certain officers and senior managers
|
|
||||
|
December 7, 2025
|
Senior executive
|
|
||||
|
January 4, 2026
|
Senior executive
|
|
| * |
The options were issued upon Mr. Doppelt's entry into office on July 1, 2019.
|
| C. |
Share-based payments (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Non-marketable options (cont'd)
|
|
|
2014 Plan
|
||||||||
|
Granted 2017
|
Granted 2018
|
Granted 2019
|
Granted 2021
|
Granted 2022
|
Granted 2023
|
Granted 2024
|
Granted 2025
|
|
|
Share price (in $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI-linked exercise price (in $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility:
|
||||||||
|
First tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of options (in years):
|
||||||||
|
First tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third tranche
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate:
|
||||||||
|
First tranche
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
Second tranche
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
Third tranche
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value (in $ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per option (in $)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C. |
Share-based payments (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Non-marketable options (cont'd)
|
|
|
Number of options (in millions)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2024
|
|
|
Movement in 2024:
|
|
|
Granted during the year
|
|
|
Exercised during the year
|
(
|
|
Total options outstanding as of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
Movement in 2025:
|
|
|
Granted during the year
|
|
|
Forfeited during the year
|
(
|
|
Exercised during the year
|
(
|
|
Total options outstanding as of December 31, 2025
|
|
| C. |
Share-based payments (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Non-marketable options (cont'd)
|
|
|
December 31, 2025
|
December 31, 2024
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
Granted in 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2021
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2024
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in 2025
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2025
|
December 31, 2024
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
Number of options exercisable (in Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average exercise price in Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average exercise price in US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2025
|
December 31, 2024
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
Range of exercise price in Israeli Shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Range of exercise price in US Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2025
|
December 31, 2024
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
Average remaining contractual life
|
|
|
|
| D. |
Dividends distributed to the Company's Shareholders
|
|
Date of dividend distribution by the Board of Directors
|
Actual date of dividend distribution
|
Gross dividend distributed ($ millions)
|
Dividend per share (in $)
|
|
February 14, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
May 9, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
August 8, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
November 7, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2023
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
May 8, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
August 12, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2024
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
November 11, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2025
|
|
|
|
|
February 17, 2026*
|
|
|
|
| E. |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
| F. |
Capital reserves
|
| G. |
Treasury shares
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|||
|
Materials consumed
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of labor
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and fuel
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses
|
|||
|
Land and Marine transportation
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of labor
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|||
|
Cost of labor
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|||
|
Cost of labor
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Other income
|
|||
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
|
|
Legal claims
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance and energy tax refunds
|
|
|
|
|
Capital gain and profit from divestment
|
|
|
|
|
Employees benefits
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Other income recorded in the income statements
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|||
|
Impairment, site closure, restoration costs and efficiency plan
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful debts
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instrument at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for legal claims
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses recorded in the income statements
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Financing income and expenses
|
|||
|
Financing income:
|
|||
|
Net gain from changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
Financing income in relation to employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from banks and others
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain from change in fair value of derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain from change in fair value of derivative designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing expenses:
|
|||
|
Net loss from change in fair value of derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from change in fair value of derivative designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expenses to banks and others
|
|
|
|
|
Financing expenses in relation to employees' benefits
|
|
|
|
|
Banks and finance institutions commissions (mainly commission on early repayment of loans)
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
Financing expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Net of borrowing costs capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing expenses recorded in the income statements
|
|
|
|
| A. |
General
|
| B. |
Groups and measurement bases of financial assets and financial liabilities
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
||||
|
Financial assets
|
Financial liabilities
|
|||
|
Measured at fair value through the statement of income
|
Measured at amortized cost
|
Measured at fair value through the statement of income
|
Measured at amortized cost
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
Current assets
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
||||
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
||||
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Foreign currency derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
||||
|
Long-term debt and debentures
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total financial instruments, net
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
| B. |
Groups and measurement bases of financial assets and financial liabilities (cont'd)
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Financial assets
|
Financial liabilities
|
|||
|
Measured at fair value through the statement of income
|
Measured at amortized cost
|
Measured at fair value through the statement of income
|
Measured at amortized cost
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
Current assets
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
||||
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
||||
|
Short term debt
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Foreign currency derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
||||
|
Long-term debt and debentures
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
(41)
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Total financial instruments, net
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
| C. |
Credit risk
|
| (1) |
General
|
| (a) | Customer credit risks |
| C. |
Credit risk (cont'd)
|
| (2) |
Maximum Exposure to credit risk
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
Carrying amount ($ millions)
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
Carrying amount ($ millions)
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (3) |
Aging of debts and impairment losses
|
|
As of December 31
|
||||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|||
|
Gross
|
Impairment
|
Gross
|
Impairment
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Not past due
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
Past due up to 3 months
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Past due 3 to 12 months
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
Past due over 12 months
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
| C. |
Credit risk (cont'd)
|
| (3) |
Aging of debts and impairment losses (cont'd)
|
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
|
|
Additional allowance
|
|
|
|
Changes due to translation differences
|
|
(
|
|
Balance as of December 31
|
|
|
| D. |
Liquidity risk
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
|||||
|
Carrying amount
|
12 months or less
|
1-2 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||
|
Non-derivative financial liabilities
|
|||||
|
Short-term debt (not including current maturities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, debentures and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments
|
|||||
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D. |
Liquidity risk (cont'd)
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|||||
|
Carrying amount
|
12 months or less
|
1-2 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||||
|
Non-derivative financial liabilities
|
|||||
|
Short-term debt (not including current maturities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, debentures and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities – derivative instruments
|
|||||
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative designated as economic hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency and interest derivative designated as cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E. |
Market risk
|
| 1. |
Interest risk
|
| E. |
Market risk (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Interest risk (cont'd)
|
| (a) |
Interest Rate Profile
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Fixed rate instruments
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
Variable rate instruments
|
||
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
||||
|
Impact on profit (loss)
|
||||
|
Decrease of 1% in interest
|
Decrease of 0.5% in interest
|
Increase of 0.5% in interest
|
Increase of 1% in interest
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
SWAP instruments
|
||||
|
Changes in Israeli shekel interest
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
| E. |
Market risk (cont'd)
|
| 1. |
Interest risk (cont'd)
|
| (d) |
Terms of derivative financial instruments used to hedge interest risk
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
||||
|
Carrying amount
(fair value) |
Stated amount
|
Maturity date
|
Interest rate range
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
Years
|
%
|
|
|
Israeli shekel
|
||||
|
SWAP contracts from fixed ILS interest to fixed USD interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
||||
|
Carrying amount
(fair value) |
Stated amount
|
Maturity date
|
Interest rate range
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
Years
|
%
|
|
|
Israeli shekel
|
||||
|
SWAP contracts from fixed ILS interest to fixed USD interest
|
(
|
|
|
|
| 2. |
Currency risk
|
| E. |
Market risk (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Currency risk (cont'd)
|
| (a) |
Sensitivity analysis
|
|
As of December 31,
|
||
|
Impact on profit (loss)
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Non-derivative financial instruments
|
||
|
US dollar/euro
|
|
(
|
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
US dollar/British pound
|
(
|
(
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
||||
|
Increase 10%
|
Increase 5%
|
Decrease 5%
|
Decrease 10%
|
|
|
$ millions
|
||||
|
US dollar/Brazilian real
|
||||
|
Forward transactions
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
||||
|
Forward transactions
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
Options
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
SWAP
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
US dollar/British pound
|
||||
|
Options
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/ US dollar
|
||||
|
Forward transactions
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
|
Options
|
|
|
(
|
(
|
| E. |
Market risk (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Currency risk (cont'd)
|
|
| (b) |
Terms of derivative financial instruments used to reduce foreign currency risk
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
|||
|
Carrying amount
|
Stated amount
|
Average
|
|
|
$ millions
|
exchange rate
|
||
|
Forward contracts
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar/Brazilian real
|
|
|
|
|
British pound/euro
|
(
|
|
|
|
British pound/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts hedge accounting
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Currency and interest SWAPs
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Put options
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US dollar
|
(
|
|
|
|
US dollar/Japanese yen
|
|
|
|
|
British pound/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Call options
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar/Japanese yen
|
|
|
|
|
British pound/US dollar
|
|
|
|
| E. |
Market risk (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Currency risk (cont'd)
|
| (b) |
Terms of derivative financial instruments used to reduce foreign currency risk (cont’d)
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|||
|
Carrying amount
|
Stated amount
|
Average exchange rate
|
|
|
$ millions
|
|||
|
Forward contracts
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
(
|
|
|
|
Euro/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar/Brazilian real
|
|
|
|
|
British pound/euro
|
|
|
|
|
British pound/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/Chinese yuan renminbi
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts hedge accounting
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Currency and interest SWAPs
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
(
|
|
|
|
Put options
|
|||
|
US Dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar/Japanese yen
|
|
|
|
|
British pound/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Call options
|
|||
|
US dollar/Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
Euro/US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar/Japanese yen
|
|
|
|
|
British pound/US dollar
|
|
|
|
| E. |
Market risk (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Currency risk (cont'd)
|
| (c) |
Linkage terms of monetary balances – in millions of dollars
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
||||||||
|
US dollar
|
Euro
|
British pound
|
Israeli shekel
|
Brazilian real
|
Chinese yuan renminbi
|
Other
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-derivative instruments:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, debentures and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Derivative instruments:
|
||||||||
|
Forward transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cylinder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SWAPS – US dollar into Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net exposure
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
| E. |
Market risk (cont'd)
|
| 2. |
Currency risk (cont'd)
|
| (c) |
Linkage terms of monetary balances – in millions of dollars (cont'd)
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
||||||||
|
US dollar
|
Euro
|
British pound
|
Israeli shekel
|
Brazilian real
|
Chinese yuan renminbi
|
Others
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-derivative instruments:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, debentures and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net
|
(
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Derivative instruments:
|
||||||||
|
Forward transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward transactions hedge accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cylinder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SWAPS – US dollar into Israeli shekel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net exposure
|
(
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
| E. |
Market risk (cont'd)
|
| 3. |
Hedge accounting
|
| F. |
Fair value of financial instruments
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|||
|
Carrying amount
|
Fair value
|
Carrying amount
|
Fair value
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|||
|
Loans bearing fixed interest (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures bearing fixed interest
|
||||
|
Marketable (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-marketable (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The fair value of the Euro loans bearing fixed interest is based on calculation of the present value of the cash flows in respect of the principal and the interest and is discounted at the market interest rates on the measurement date for similar loans having similar characteristics and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The average discount interest as of December 31, 2025, for the Euro loans was
|
| (2) |
The fair value of the marketable debentures is based on quoted stock exchange price and is classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
|
| (3) |
The fair value of the non-marketable debentures is based on calculation of the present value of the cash flows in respect of the principal and the interest and is discounted at the SOFR rate customary in the market for similar loans having similar characteristics and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The average discount interest as of December 31, 2025, was
|
| G. |
Hierarchy of fair value
|
|
Level 2
|
As of
December 31, 2025
|
As of
December 31, 2024
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
Derivatives designated as economic hedge, net
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedge, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Earnings attributed to the shareholders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
Shares thousands
|
Shares thousands
|
Shares thousands
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued during the year
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in computation of the basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
Shares thousands
|
Shares thousands
|
Shares thousands
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of the basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of stock options*
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of the diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
| A. |
Parent company and subsidiaries
|
| B. |
Benefits to key management personnel (including directors)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Short-term benefits
|
|
|
|
Post-employment benefits
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
|
Total *
|
|
|
|
* To interested parties employed by the Company
|
|
|
|
* To interested parties not employed by the Company
|
|
|
| C. |
Ordinary transactions that are not exceptional
|
| (1) |
It is not an “extraordinary transaction” within the meaning thereof in the Companies Law.
|
| (2) |
The effect of each of the parameters listed below is less than one percent (hereinafter – the Negligibility Threshold).
|
| C. |
Ordinary transactions that are not exceptional (cont’d)
|
| (3) |
The transaction is negligible also from a qualitative point of view. For the purpose of these criteria, it shall be examined whether there are special considerations justifying reporting of the transaction, even if it does not meet the quantitative criteria described above.
|
| (4) |
In examining the negligibility of a transaction expected to occur in the future, among other things, the probability of the transaction occurring will be examined.
|
| D. |
Transactions with related and interested parties
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
2025
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, transport and marketing expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Financing income, net
|
(
|
(
|
(
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
As of July 2022, directors who are officers or directors of Israel Corp. (other than Mr. Yoav Doppelt), namely Mr. Aviad Kaufman and Mr. Sagi Kabla, are paid the same cash compensation as paid to all other non-executive directors of the Company, namely the fixed annual fee and per meeting fees payable to directors from time to time under the regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law, 1999 governing the compensation of external directors. Mr. Kabla requested that his compensation be assigned to Israel Corp.
|
| (2) |
The Company’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies include a two-tier coverage for directors’ and officers’ liability, comprising of a joint primary tier with Israel Corp. and a separate tier covering the Company alone. Our directors and officers are beneficiaries of both tiers.
|
| E. |
Balances with related and interested parties
|
|
As of December 31
|
||
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
$ millions
|
$ millions
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
Ownership interest in its
subsidiary and investee companies
for the year ended December 31
|
|||
|
Name of company
|
Principal location of the
company’s activity
|
2025
|
2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 1.00 per share
|
ICL
|
The New York Stock Exchange
|
| • |
any two directors of the company or one quarter of the serving members of the board of directors; or
|
| • |
To preserve the character of the Company and its subsidiaries Dead Sea Works Ltd., Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd., Dead Sea Bromine Ltd., Bromine Compounds Ltd. and Tami (I.M.I.) Research & Development Institute Ltd. as Israeli companies
whose centers of business and management are in Israel.
|
| • |
To monitor the control over minerals and natural resources, for purposes of their efficient development and utilization, including maximum implementation in Israel of the results of investments, research and development.
|
| • |
To prevent the acquisition of a position of influence in the Company or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries by hostile entities or entities likely to harm the foreign and security interests of the State of Israel.
|
| • |
To prevent the acquisition of a position of influence in the Company or the foregoing Israeli subsidiaries or management of such companies, if such acquisition or management may create a situation of material conflict of interest likely
to harm one of the vital interests listed above.
|
| • |
an amendment to the company's articles of association;
|
| • |
an increase of the company's authorized share capital;
|
| • |
a merger; and
|
| • |
certain related party transactions requiring shareholder approval under Israeli law.
|
| (i) |
an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements; or
|
| 2. |
Recoupment of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
|
| 7. |
Miscellaneous.
|
|
Name of Subsidiary / Investee company
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
|
Bromine Compounds Ltd.,
|
Israel
|
|
|
Chemada Fine Chemicals Ltd. (under liquidation)
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Periclase Fused Products Co. (registered partnership in Israel).
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Periclase Ltd. (under liquidation)
|
Israel
|
|
|
Dead Sea Works Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Edom Mining and Development Ltd. (the operations were transferred to Rotem)
|
Israel
|
|
|
Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
ICL Israel Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Keter Tovala Ltd (the operations were transferred to Rotem)
|
Israel
|
|
|
M.M.M. Company United Landfill, Industries (1998), Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Mifalei Tovala Ltd.,
|
Israel
|
|
|
P.A.M.A. Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Revivim in the Bay Water Environment Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Sherut Integrated transportation services (2013) Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
Tami (IMI) Institute for R&D Ltd.
|
Israel
|
|
|
B.K. Giulini Argentina S.A
|
Argentina
|
|
|
Everris Australia Pty Ltd.
|
Australia
|
|
|
Fibrisol Service Australia Pty. Ltd.
|
Australia
|
|
|
Prolactal GmbH
|
Austria
|
|
|
ICL Belgium (Sales) N.V.
|
Belgium
|
|
|
ICL Belgium NV
|
Belgium
|
|
|
Bromisa Industrial e Commercial Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
ICL América do Sul S.A Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
ICL Aditivos e Ingredientes Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Mixmicro Indústria e Comércio de Produtos Químicos Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Nitro 1000 Indústria e Comércio de Produtos Agropecuários e Têxteis Ltda.
|
Brazil
|
|
|
ICL Growing Solutions Canada Inc.
|
Canada
|
|
|
ICL Investment Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
Name of Subsidiary / Investee company
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
|
Sinobrom Compounds Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Yunnan BK Giulini Tianchuang Phosphate Co. Ltd.,
|
China
|
|
|
Yunnan ICL YTH Phosphate Research and Technology Center Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Yunnan Phosphate Haikou Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Yunnan Tianchuang Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
ICL (Zhangjiagang) International Trading Co. Ltd.
|
China
|
|
|
Allana Potash Afar PLC (under liquidation)
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
ICL Potash Ethiopia Plc. (under liquidation)
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
Nova Potash PLC (under liquidation)
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
Rotem Manufacturing Private Limited Company
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
ICL France Spécialités SAS
|
France
|
|
|
Scora S.A.S.
|
France
|
|
|
BK Giulini GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
BKG Finance GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
Hoyerman Chemie GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Deutschland Ludwigshafen GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Deutschland Vertriebs GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Fertilizers Deutschland GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Holding beschränkt haftende O.H.G. (partnership)
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Holding Germany GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL IP Bitterfeld GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL Ludwigshafen Service GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
ICL-IP Bitterfeld Grundbesitz GmbH & Co KG (partnership)
|
Germany
|
|
|
Pulse-Tex GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
Turris Versicherungvermittlung GmbH
|
Germany
|
|
|
A.R.M. Ltd.,
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
D.D.F.R Corporation Ltd.
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
ICL Asia Ltd.
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
ICL Trading (HK) Ltd.
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
ICL Fertilizers (India) Private Ltd.
|
India
|
|
|
ICL Management and Trading India Private Limited
|
India
|
|
|
ICL Italia Treviso SRL,
|
Italy
|
|
|
ICL Italy SRL Milano
|
Italy
|
|
Name of Subsidiary / Investee company
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
|
ICL Japan Ltd.
|
Japan
|
|
|
Everris Kenya Ltd.
|
Kenya
|
|
|
ICL Korea Ltd.
|
Korea
|
|
|
Everris Malaysia Sdn. Bhd
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
ICL Fosfatos y Aditivos de México S. A. de C.V.
|
Mexico
|
|
|
ICL Polska S.p z.o.o
|
Poland
|
|
|
ICL Romania S.r.l.
|
Romania
|
|
|
ICL Rus LLC
|
Russia
|
|
|
ICL Group Asia Pacific PTE. LTD
|
Singapore
|
|
|
ICL Growing Solutions (Pty) Ltd.
|
South Africa
|
|
|
Everris Iberica Fertilizers S.L.
|
Spain
|
|
|
Fomento y Desarrollo Agrícola S.L
|
Spain
|
|
|
Fuentes Fertilizantes S.L.
|
Spain
|
|
|
Iberpotash S.A.
|
Spain
|
|
|
ICL BM, S.L.
|
Spain
|
|
|
ICL Iberia Ltd. SCA
|
Spain
|
|
|
Logística de Fertilizantes Fuentes S.A
|
Spain
|
|
|
Trafico de Mercancías S.A.
|
Spain
|
|
|
Twincap Forsakrings A.B.
|
Sweden
|
|
|
ICL Swiss (Zug) GmbH
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
Intracap Insurance Ltd
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
ICL Fertilizers Tanzania Limited
|
Tanzania
|
|
|
Amsterdam Fertilizers B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
Ashli Chemicals IL B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
Everris International B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Europe B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Europe Coöperatief U.A.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Fertilizers Europe C.V. (partnership)
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Finance B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL Puriphos B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
ICL-IP Terneuzen B.V
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
Incap B.V.
|
The Netherlands
|
|
Name of Subsidiary / Investee company
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
|
Rotem Kimyevi Maddeler Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S,
|
Turkey
|
|
|
Amega Sciences Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Cleveland Potash Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Constantine & Company (Export) Limited
|
UK
|
|
|
Everris Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Fibrisol Service Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Greenbest Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
ICL UK (Sales) Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
Nutrient Sciences Ltd.
|
UK
|
|
|
B.K. Mercosur S.A.
|
Uruguay
|
|
|
Custom Ag Formulators, LLC
|
USA
|
|
|
Custom Ag Formulators TX, Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
Everris NA, Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
Growers Holdings Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
Growers Tech Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Americas LLC
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Finance Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Group America Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Specialty products Inc
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL Specialty Products North America Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
ICL-IP America Inc.
|
USA
|
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ICL Group Ltd.;
|
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
|
|
4.
|
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
|
|
5.
|
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit
committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
| (b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
/s/ Elad Aharonson
|
||
| Elad Aharonson President & Chief Executive Officer |
||
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ICL Group Ltd.;
|
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
|
|
4.
|
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
|
|
5.
|
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit
committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
/s/ Aviram Lahav
|
||
|
Aviram Lahav
Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
1.
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|
|
2.
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ICL Group Ltd.
|
| /s/ Elad Aharonson | |
|
Elad Aharonson
|
|
|
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
| /s/ Aviram Lahav | |
|
Aviram Lahav
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
SLR Consulting Limited
|
|
|
Consent of Qualified Person for ICL Group Resources and Reserves for Fiscal Year 2025
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Report Summary entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE BOULBY MINING OPERATION, UNITED KINGDOM” prepared by WAI, and with an
effective date of December 31, 2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F.
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Report Summary entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE CABANASSES AND VILAFRUNS MINING OPERATION, SPAIN” prepared by WAI, and with
an effective date of December 31, 2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F.
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Report Summary entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE DEAD SEA WORKS MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL” prepared by WAI, and with an
effective date of December 31, 2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F.
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Report Summary entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE ROTEM MINING OPERATION, ISRAEL” prepared by WAI, and with an effective date
of December 31, 2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F.
|
| • |
the use of the Technical Report Summary entitled “S-K 1300 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE HAIKOU MINING OPERATION, CHINA” prepared by WAI, and with an effective date
of December 31, 2024, and dated February 27, 2025, by the Issuer referenced in the Form 20-F.
|
| • |
the use and references to our name or WAI’s name, including ours or WAI’s status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K
promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 20-F, the Registration Statement (as defined below) and the Technical Report Summaries.
|
|
|
Registered Office:
3rd Floor, Summit House, 12 Red Lion Square, London, WC1R 4QH
|
SLR Consulting Limited
|
|
|
3rd Floor, Summit House, 12 Red Lion Square, London, WC1R 4QH
|
|||
|
Registered No:SLR Consulting Limited 3880506
|
Tel: +44 3300 886631
|
||
| • |
any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summaries in the Form 20-F and incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement and the use of any
information derived, summarized, quoted, or referenced from the Technical Report Summaries, or portions thereof, that was prepared by WAI, or that WAI supervised the preparation of, and/or that was reviewed and approved by WAI, that is
included or incorporated by reference in the Form 20-F and the Registration Statement.
|
| • |
the incorporation by reference of the Technical Report Summaries into the Issuer’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-205518) (the “Registration
Statement”) of the above items as included in the Form 20-F.
|

|
2
|
![]() |
| WHEREAS |
as of the date of execution of this Agreement, DSW is the holder of the concession (the “Existing Concession”) as such term is defined in the Dead Sea Concession Law, 5721-1961 (the “Concession Law”), pursuant to the provisions of the Concession Law and the concession deed appended thereto (the “Existing Concession Deed”), under which DSW, Bromine
Company and Magnesium Company carry out the activities of the Existing Concession, including holding the assets of the Existing Concession (as defined below);
|
| WHEREAS |
pursuant to Section 4 of the Existing Concession Deed, the term of the Existing Concession is until March 31, 2030 (the “Concession Expiry Date”);
|
| WHEREAS |
the State intends to allocate a new concession that will enter into effect immediately after the Concession Expiry Date (the “Future Concession”) and that will replace the Existing Concession, and
for such purpose the State intends to conduct a competitive, equal and fair process for granting the Future Concession (the “Tender”);
|
| WHEREAS |
Section 24 of the Existing Concession Deed provides, inter alia, that on the Concession Expiry Date “all fixed tangible assets belonging to the concession holder shall become the property of the Government and the Government shall pay the
concession holder, in consideration for such fixed tangible assets, their depreciated replacement value as of on the termination date. Any other assets of any kind belonging to the concession holder on the termination date shall remain the
property of the concession holder”;
|
| WHEREAS |
by agreement of the Parties, this Agreement constitutes, inter alia, an agreed implementation of Section 24 of the Existing Concession Deed;
|
| WHEREAS |
the State seeks to ensure that the issues associated with the expiry of the concession term and the granting of the next concession will be regulated in an optimal manner, while providing certainty to ICL and the Dead Sea Companies with
respect to the value of the Existing Concession assets and the time of receipt of the consideration therefor, and the State also seeks to ensure that until the Concession Expiry Date the Existing Concession activity will continue to be
carried out in a manner not materially different from the manner in which it is carried out prior to the execution date of this Agreement, as well as the transfer of the Existing Concession assets in proper condition and fit for immediate use
in a similar manner to their use by the existing concession holder, by the future concession holder;
|
| WHEREAS |
the Parties seek to regulate the payment by the State to the Dead Sea Companies for the Existing Concession assets and the fulfilment of the Parties’ additional obligations under this Agreement;
|
| WHEREAS |
on November 5, 2025, a Memorandum of Understanding was executed between the Government of Israel on the one hand and the Dead Sea Companies and ICL on the other hand (the “MOU”) concerning the
matters set out above, in which it was agreed, among other things, that following its signing the Parties will conduct, in accordance with its principles, good-faith discussions with the objective of formulating and agreeing upon a detailed
agreement that will anchor the understandings included in the MOU (the “Detailed Agreement”);
|
| WHEREAS |
the Parties conducted a dialogue in good faith in accordance with the principles set forth in the MOU and reached the agreements detailed below.
|
| 1. |
General
|
| 1.1. |
The appendices listed below are attached to this Agreement:
|
| 1.1.1. |
Appendix A – 2025 Investment Procedure;
|
| 1.1.2. |
Appendix B – List of the Existing Concession Assets as of December 31, 2024;
|
| 1.1.3. |
Appendix C – Example of the manner of implementation of the payment mechanism;
|
| 1.1.4. |
Appendix D – Details of the data, information and documents;
|
| 1.1.5. |
Appendix E – Confidentiality Appendix;
|
| 1.1.6. |
Appendix F – List of Operational Agreements;
|
| 1.1.7. |
Appendix G – Format of a report for reporting investments and maintenance in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Procedure.
|
| 1.2. |
The preamble and the appendices to this Agreement constitute an integral part hereof.
|
| 1.3. |
The headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be given weight in the interpretation of this Agreement.
|
| 1.4. |
Without derogating from other definitions in this Agreement, the following terms in this Agreement shall have the meanings attached thereto, as follows:
|
| 1.4.1. |
“Future Concession Holder” – the entity that will receive from the State the Future Concession for the extraction of natural resources from the waters of the Dead Sea;
|
| 1.4.2. |
“Financial Statements” – financial statements prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Dead Sea Companies;
|
| 1.4.3. |
"Dollar" – United States Dollar;
|
| 1.4.4. |
"The State " –including the Government of Israel, and anyone appointed by it or acting on its behalf, including external consultants, and including a tender committee to be established for conducting
the Tender;
|
| 1.4.5. |
“Salt Harvesting Agreement” – the agreement executed between the State and DSW on July 8, 2012, in connection with the salt harvesting project in Pond No. 5, and adopted by the Government by virtue
of Government Resolution No. 4060 dated January 1, 2012 titled “Implementation of the permanent protection project in the Dead Sea and its financing and increase of the royalties payable to the State”
|
| 1.4.6. |
"Investments" - capital investments in the Existing Concession Assets, in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Dead Sea Companies;
|
| 1.4.7. |
"Dead Sea Companies" – DSW, the Bromine Company and the Magnesium Company, each separately or together;
|
| 1.4.8. |
"ICL" – ICL Group Ltd.;
|
| 1.4.9. |
"Arbitration Law" – the Arbitration Law, 5728-1968;
|
| 1.4.10. |
"Dead Sea" – as defined in the Existing Concession Deed, and any amendment thereto up to the Concession Expiry Date;
|
| 1.4.11. |
"Documents" – including documents in digital media;
|
| 1.4.12. |
"Concession Expiry Date" – as defined in the preamble to this Agreement;
|
| 1.4.13. |
"2020 Procedure" – the procedure dated March 23, 2020, titled “Process for examining investments of Dead Sea Works Ltd. from 2020 until the end of the Concession term”;
|
| 1.4.14. |
"Work Procedure" – a document defining the working methods, performance processes, and decision-making methods in the company, including professional manuals, used for operating the Existing Concession Assets;
|
| 1.4.15. |
"Damage" – as defined in the Torts Ordinance, of any kind and type, directly or indirectly;
|
| 1.4.16. |
"Existing Concession Assets" – as defined in Section 3.1 below;
|
| 1.4.17. |
"Fixed Assets" – in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Dead Sea Companies;
|
| 1.4.18. |
"Concession Area" – the concession area as determined in the Existing Concession Deed;
|
| 1.4.19. |
"Existing Concession Deed" – as defined in the preamble to this Agreement;
|
| 1.5. |
Subject to the foregoing, all terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning given to them in the Existing Concession Deed, unless expressly stated otherwise below.
|
| 2. |
Representations, Approvals and General Undertakings
|
| 2.1. |
The Parties hereby represent, confirm and undertake that: (a) this Agreement has been duly approved by all authorized bodies and, upon its execution, shall bind the Parties in all respects; (b) no third party consent is required for this
Agreement and its performance; and (c) there is no impediment under any law or agreement to either Party entering into this Agreement and fully and timely performing its obligations hereunder.
|
| 2.2. |
It is agreed between the Parties that nothing in this Agreement derogates from the responsibility of the Future Concession Holder to be prepared to receive the assets, information, systems and other rights and obligations transferred to it
pursuant to this Agreement, and in accordance with its provisions, at the expense of the Future Concession Holder.
|
| 3. |
Transfer of Existing Concession Assets
|
| 3.1. |
On the Concession Expiry Date, all Existing Concession Assets, as detailed in Section 3.2 below, which, according to the representation of the Dead Sea Companies, include all assets affixed to the real property in the Concession Area, and
other assets used directly, in the ordinary course of business, for the production processes carried out in the Concession Area pursuant to the Concession Law, shall be fully and entirely transferred to the State or to the Future Concession
Holder, in consideration for their full payment to the Dead Sea Companies, as detailed in Section 5 below.
|
| 3.2. |
"Existing Concession Assets” shall be the following assets:
|
| 3.2.1. |
All assets of any kind and type recorded in the fixed assets of the Dead Sea Companies (fixed assets and non-fixed assets; attached and non-attached assets; real property, including land and movable property; assets that have been fully
depreciated and those that have not been fully depreciated; assets located within the Concession Area and assets not located within the Concession Area), which are used for the purpose of exercising their rights under the Existing Concession
Deed (“Operation of the Concession”), and which are included in the audited financial statements of the Dead Sea Companies for 2024, and those which will be included in the audited financial statements
of the Dead Sea Companies for 2029 (together with an adjustment of the value of the fixed assets approved by an accountant for the end of the Concession term (March 31, 2030).
|
| 3.2.2. |
Intangible assets owned by the Dead Sea Companies, whether or not included in their financial statements, used for the Operation of the Concession, and which shall include: research and development performed by the Dead Sea Companies;
intellectual property rights, software and drawings, know-how and knowledge, excluding holdings in other companies of the ICL Group.
|
| 3.3. |
List of Existing Concession Assets:
|
| 3.3.1. |
The list of the Existing Concession Assets shall include the fixed assets of the Dead Sea Companies, as detailed in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 above, in accordance with their audited financial statements, as they will be from year to year, as
well as the intangible assets, as detailed in Appendix B, as updated annually (the “List of the Existing Concession Assets”).
|
| 3.3.2. |
Attached as Appendix B is the list of the Existing Concession Assets as of December 31, 2024.
|
| 3.3.3. |
The State shall use the List of the Existing Concession Assets for the purpose of granting the Future Concession, subject to the candidates signing a confidentiality agreement in a form agreed between the Parties as a condition for its
receipt. ICL shall make reasonable efforts to assist the State in refining the List of the Existing Concession Assets, so that it accurately reflects the assets included in the concession.
|
| 3.3.4. |
In the month of May in the years 2025 through 2029, and on the Concession Expiry Date, ICL shall be responsible for sending the updated Appendix B.
|
| 3.4. |
Upon the Concession Expiry Date, physical possession of the Existing Concession Assets shall be fully and entirely transferred, in proper, functional and ready for continued operation, in a manner and condition similar to their condition
prior to their transfer, and without any interruption that depends on the existing Concession Holder (the “Transfer of Ownership and Possession of the Assets”).
|
| 3.5. |
Without derogating from the generality of this Agreement, if it becomes apparent to the Parties that after the Concession Expiry Date, there is any item included in the Existing Concession Assets that was not transferred to the full and
exclusive ownership of the State or to the Future Concession Holder and should have been transferred pursuant to the provisions of Sections 3.1 and 3.2 above, or conversely, any asset was transferred by the Dead Sea Companies or anyone on
their behalf to the ownership of the State or to the Future Concession Holder, but should not have been transferred pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, the Parties shall act jointly so that such asset will be transferred to the
possession and full ownership of the State or the Future Concession Holder, if it was supposed to be transferred to them; or so that such asset will be returned to the full ownership of the Dead Sea Companies or anyone on their behalf if it
was not supposed to leave their ownership, as applicable, immediately and without any additional cost or payment.
|
| 3.6. |
The Dead Sea Companies undertake that until the Concession Expiry Date, all of their rights in the Existing Concession Assets shall remain free and clear. The Dead Sea Companies undertake that they shall remove, no later than 120 days
prior to the Concession Expiry Date, and at their full expense, any lien, encumbrance, charge, pledge, lien, restriction, impediment, blockage or other obligation that is imposed, if imposed, on any of the Existing Concession Assets.
|
| 3.7. |
From the date of signing of this Agreement, ICL and the Dead Sea Companies shall refrain from taking any action and shall avoid any omission, directly or indirectly, that may impair the transfer of ownership of the Existing Concession
Assets to the State, including: they shall not sell or transfer, or reclassify any assets from a fixed assets classification to another classification that is not fixed assets, directly or indirectly, for consideration or for no
consideration; and they shall not transfer, directly or indirectly, for consideration or for no consideration, any right in the Dead Sea Assets (including by way of a lien) – except to the State or the Future Concession Holder, or with the
State prior written approval.
|
| 3.8. |
Any right, debt, obligation, demand or claim brought by any third party in connection with the Existing Concession Assets, the cause for which arose up to the Concession Expiry Date, shall apply exclusively and entirely to the Dead Sea
Companies, and they shall bear full, absolute and sole responsibility in connection therewith. Without derogating from the foregoing, if any claim is made against the State or anyone on its behalf, or against the Future Concession Holder, in
connection with the Existing Concession Assets, the cause for which arose up to the Concession Expiry Date (inclusive), the State or the Future Concession Holder shall notify the Dead Sea Companies as soon as possible, and the Dead Sea
Companies shall ensure that such claim is removed, or shall bear any reasonable expense incurred by the State or anyone on its behalf, or by the Future Concession Holder, in connection therewith, to the extent that they acted to remove such
claim because the Dead Sea Companies did not do so.
|
| 3.9. |
Any right, debt, obligation, demand or claim brought by any third party in connection with the Existing Concession Assets, the cause for which arose after the Concession Expiry Date, shall apply exclusively and entirely to the State or the
Future Concession Holder, and they shall bear full, absolute and sole responsibility in connection therewith. Without derogating from the foregoing, if any claim is made against the Dead Sea Companies or anyone on their behalf in connection
with the Existing Concession Assets, the cause for which arose after the Concession Expiry Date, the Dead Sea Companies shall notify the State and the Future Concession Holder as soon as possible, and the State and the Future Concession
Holder shall ensure that such claim is removed, or shall bear any reasonable expense incurred by the Dead Sea Companies or anyone on their behalf in connection therewith, to the extent that they acted to remove such claim because the State
and the Future Concession Holder did not do so.
|
| 3.10. |
Asset Transfer Procedure:
|
| 3.10.1. |
Six months prior to the Concession Expiry Date, ICL, together with the State, shall formulate an orderly procedure for the transfer of the Existing Concession Assets, such that this procedure will be ready and agreed no later than three
months prior to the Concession Expiry Date. Such transfer procedure shall include, inter alia, the following:
|
| 3.10.1.1. |
a handover process for transferring the Existing Concession Assets to the Future Concession Holder;
|
| 3.10.1.2. |
good-faith negotiations between the Future Concession Holder or the State and the Dead Sea Companies regarding the purchase of the Dead Sea Companies’ spare parts inventory required for the Concession activity, taking into account the
needs of other companies in the ICL Group. It is clarified that the State may approach the Dead Sea Companies for the purpose of conducting negotiations prior to the date stated in Section 3.10.1 above.
|
| 3.10.2. |
The asset trnasition process shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure to be formulated pursuant to this Section, and the handover shall commence approximately two months prior to the Concession Expiry Date, and shall end no
later than approximately one month after the commencement of the Future Concession. This process shall take place with the Future Concession Holder in the presence of and accompanied by representatives of the State.
|
| 3.11. |
Preservation, operation, investment and maintenance of the Existing Concession Assets and the rights therein until their transfer:
|
| 3.11.1. |
Until the Concession Expiry Date, the Dead Sea Companies shall continue the Existing Concession activity in the ordinary course of business in a similar manner as it was prior to the signing of this Agreement, including: (a) maintaining
extraction and production activity at a level no less than the production capacity that existed under the Existing Concession, based on the average production capacity of the five years preceding the signing of this Agreement; (b) operating,
preserving, investing in and maintaining the Existing Concession Assets in a manner and scope similar to that carried out prior to the signing of the MOU and this Agreement, such that they will be suitable and fit to carry out the Existing
Concession activity, and in particular they shall carry out investments and maintenance in the Existing Concession Assets in the same annual amount carried out in the past decade, namely 292 million Dollars (USD 292,000,000), on a multi-year
average.
|
| 3.11.2. |
The Parties agree that the implementation of this Section shall be carried out as detailed in Appendix A to this Agreement, which shall replace the 2020 Procedure, and that the scope of investments
and maintenance as set out in Section 3.11.1 shall be reviewed from January 1, 2025, onwards.
|
| 4. |
Establishment of Infrastructure in Accordance with the Provisions of the Salt Harvesting Agreement
|
| 4.1. |
Until the Concession Expiry Date, the Dead Sea Companies shall provide the permanent solution for salt harvesting, its transport and deposition or dispersal, as determined for implementation in the Salt Harvesting Agreement (the “Permanent Solution”), in a full and operational manner, all in accordance with the plans approved by the relevant authorities and subject to their approvals.
|
| 4.2. |
All systems, facilities and components that will be established as part of the Permanent Solution shall be included within the Existing Concession Assets that will be transferred to the State upon the expiry of the Concession in accordance
with the provisions of Section 3.1, and the consideration therefor shall be as detailed in Section 5 below.
|
| 4.3. |
If, for any reason, the aforesaid Permanent Solution is not fully established and operational by the Concession Expiry Date, the Dead Sea Companies shall continue to act, also after the Concession Expiry Date, in order to complete its
establishment, including in a case where the Dead Sea Companies or a related party thereto are not the Future Concession Holder. The reimbursement amounts for the additional investments that will be required to complete the Permanent Solution
after the Concession Expiry Date shall be paid by the State to the Dead Sea Companies in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.1.2 and Section 6.2.2 below. Nothing in the foregoing shall derogate from the State’s right to initiate
proceedings to enforce its rights with respect to damages caused to it or to the Future Concession Holder, if any, due to the failure to provide the Permanent Solution by the Concession Expiry Date. Such proceedings shall not be conducted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 11 of this Agreement.
|
| 5. |
The Total Consideration
|
| 5.1. |
In consideration for the transfer of ownership and possession of the Existing Concession Assets pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, the State shall pay to ICL the consideration set forth in Section 5.1.1 and also 5.1.2 as
detailed below, which together shall constitute the total consideration (the “Total Consideration”):
|
| 5.1.1. |
The Main Consideration – a total amount of 2.54 billion Dollars (USD 2,540,000,000) plus VAT, to the extent that VAT applies in accordance with applicable law, subject to the provisions of this Agreement regarding any
increase or decrease of the main consideration as stated in Appendix A.
|
| 5.1.2. |
Consideration for investments in the permanent solution for salt harvesting – an amount equal to the reimbursement of investments for the assets in the permanent solution for salt harvesting, based on the actual invoice costs for the investments
made by the Dead Sea Companies from January 1, 2025 until the establishment of the Permanent Solution for salt harvesting, its transport and deposition or dispersal in accordance with the Salt Harvesting Agreement. The amount of the
consideration for investments in the Permanent Solution for salt harvesting shall be paid as specified in Appendix A, and this amount shall be paid plus VAT. to the extent that VAT applies in
accordance with applicable law. For the avoidance of doubt, the consideration for investments in the Permanent Solution for salt harvesting shall not include payment for maintenance activities or operational activities relating to
harvesting, transport and deposition or dispersal of the salt, but only for investment in the establishment of assets for the Permanent Solution for salt harvesting as part of the Salt Harvesting Agreement. Notwithstanding the provisions of
Section 8.2 of the Salt Harvesting Agreement, the following shall be deducted from the aforesaid amount:
|
| 5.1.2.1. |
20% of all of the Dead Sea Companies’ expenses for the Permanent Solution, constituting the State’s ongoing participation in establishing the Permanent Solution;
|
| 5.1.2.2. |
The annual depreciation rates for each infrastructure that will be established and operated under the Salt Harvesting Agreement shall reflect the technical-economic useful life of each infrastructure; however, the weighted annual
depreciation rate of all infrastructures for which depreciation is recorded shall not be less than an average of 4%.
|
| 5.2. |
The Total Consideration shall be paid on the payment date in United States Dollars.
|
| 5.3. |
It is clarified that the Total Consideration, and each component thereof, shall be paid together with VAT, to the extent applicable in accordance with applicable law. In any event and for the avoidance of doubt, to the extent that VAT
applies to the transaction, the State shall bear the cost thereof, and not the Dead Sea Companies or ICL.
|
| 6. |
Manner of Payment
|
| 6.1. |
Payment of the Adjusted Total Consideration on the Concession Expiry Date (April 1, 2030):
|
| 6.1.1. |
Out of the Total Consideration as defined in Section 5, the State shall pay to the Dead Sea Companies 95% of the Adjusted Total Consideration, plus VAT to the extent that VAT applies in accordance with applicable law, on the Concession
Expiry Date.
|
| 6.1.2. |
The ““Adjusted Total Consideration” shall be determined as detailed below:
|
| 6.1.2.1. |
In accordance with the reports of the Dead Sea Companies, as detailed in Sections 18.1.2 and 18.2.1, and subject to determinations made as stated in Section 11 below, if such determinations were made by the Concession Expiry Date, provided
that the following conditions are met:
|
| 6.1.2.1.1. |
The Dead Sea Companies complied with their reporting obligation, as required in Appendix A;
|
| 6.1.2.1.2. |
The Dead Sea Companies reported that they performed at least the conditions as specified in Sections 16.1.1 and 16.1.2 of Appendix A; if for any reason the Dead Sea Companies reported that they did
not meet the conditions as specified in such sections and reported compliance in lower amounts, the amount of the Adjusted Total Consideration shall be reduced in accordance with Section 16.4.1.1 to the amounts so reported.
|
| 6.1.2.2. |
If the condition set forth above in Section 6.1.2.1.1 was not met, the amount of the Adjusted Total Consideration shall be determined in accordance with the amounts approved by the State in accordance with the interim financial
reconciliation mechanism and the mechanism in lieu of the interim financial reconciliation mechanism (a final investment plan for 2029 and the first quarter of 2030), as specified in Appendix A,
subject to determinations made by the arbitrators as stated in Section 11 below, if such determinations were made by the date of the transfer of ownership and possession of the Assets.
|
| 6.2. |
Final Financial Reconciliation – payment of the remaining balance of the Total Consideration (September 1, 2030):
|
| 6.2.1. |
The State shall pay to the Dead Sea Companies on September 1, 2030, the remaining balance of the Total Consideration, as specified below:
|
| 6.2.1.1. |
The remaining balance of the Total Consideration shall be the difference between the amount of the Adjusted Total Consideration already paid to the Dead Sea Companies on the Concession Expiry Date as specified in Section 6.1 above, and the
amount of the Total Consideration, as specified in Section 5.1 above.
|
| 6.2.1.2. |
If the arbitrators order to withhold the payment of the remaining balance of the Total Consideration, in whole or in part, as provided in Section 18.2.4, the amount in respect of which the arbitrators ordered to withhhold the payment shall
be transferred only upon completion of the dispute resolution process, and the provisions of Section 6.3 regarding interest and linkage shall apply to this amount.
|
| 6.2.2. |
Late completion of the Permanent Solution – notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.2.1.1, in the event that the Dead Sea Companies did not complete the Permanent Solution by August 31, 2030, the final financial reconciliation on
September 1, 2030, shall be carried out with the following adjustments:
|
| 6.2.2.1. |
On September 1, 2030, payment shall be made in respect of the remaining balance of the main consideration as specified in Section 5.1.1 only;
|
| 6.2.2.2. |
On the date of completion of the establishment of the Permanent Solution in a full and operational manner, payment shall be made in respect of the remaining investments in the Permanent Solution for salt harvesting as specified in Section
5.1.2 that were made up to March 31, 2030;
|
| 6.2.2.3. |
Sixty (60) days following the completion of the establishment of the Permanent Solution in a full and operational manner, payment shall be made in respect of the remaining investments in the Permanent Solution for salt harvesting as
specified in Section 5.1.2 that were made from April 1, 2030, until the date of completion of the Permanent Solution.
|
| 6.3. |
Subject to compliance with the payment dates, as specified above, no linkage differentials or interest shall be added to the payments under this Agreement. Any amount that is not paid on the date specified in this Agreement shall bear
interest and linkage in accordance with the Interest and Linkage Law, 5721-1961. The obligation to bear interest and linkage payments shall also apply to an amount that a dispute resolution mechanism determined that one of the Parties was
obligated to pay at an earlier date or that was overpaid and has to be refunded.
|
| 6.4. |
Except in a case where one of the Parties took dispute resolution steps under this Agreement as specified in Section 18.2.4, payment of the full amount of the Total Consideration as stated, against the transfer of the Existing Concession
Assets, shall constitute a satisfaction of any right, allegation, demand or claim of the Dead Sea Companies or ICL and of the State, each vis-à-vis the other, in relation to this agreement.
|
| 6.5. |
The State shall not have a right of set-off or withhold the Total Consideration under this Agreement, in whole or in part, by virtue of this Agreement or any other grounds, without derogating from the provisions of Section 6.1.1 above
which provide for payment of 95% of the Adjusted Total Consideration on the Concession Expiry Date and payment of the remaining balance of the Total Consideration on September 1, 2030, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 6.2.1 and
6.2.2.
|
| 6.6. |
Attached as Appendix C is an example of the manner of implementation of the payment mechanism set forth in this Agreement.
|
| 7. |
Provision of Data, Information and Documents in Connection with the Existing Concession Operation to the State
|
| 7.1. |
The Dead Sea Companies shall provide to the State all data, information and documents as specified in Appendix D in connection with the Existing Concession activity, whether the data, information
and documents are in the possession of the Dead Sea Companies or whether they are in the possession of any of the other companies in the ICL Group (the “Data, Information and Documents”). The Dead Sea
Companies and ICL shall not refrain from delivering the Data, Information and Documents to the State due to any claim whatsoever, subject to arrangements for maintaining confidentiality on the part of the State or anyone on its behalf as
specified below. The State, including anyone on its behalf, shall maintain this information in confidentiality, subject to the provisions below, and shall use the Data, Information and Documents solely for the purposes of granting a future
concession, and for no other purpose. It is further clarified that the information as specified in Appendix D shall be provided, to the extent that the Dead Sea Companies and ICL have such available
information or that it can be made available with reasonable effort and without an investment of resources that would impair the ordinary course of business of the companies.
|
| 7.2. |
All Data, Information and Documents provided by the Dead Sea Companies and ICL shall be complete, correct and full.
|
| 7.3. |
The Dead Sea Companies and ICL shall provide the Data, Information and Documents to the State as aforesaid in accordance with the provisions of Appendix D, in accordance with the date specified in
the table above, and in any event no later than January 1, 2027 (the “Date for Provision of the Data, Information and Documents to the State”).
|
| 7.4. |
The Data, Information and Documents shall be provided by the Dead Sea Companies and ICL in digital form, and the State shall be required to be prepared in all respects to receive the information in its systems, including ensuring its
security in full coordination with ICL’s information security unit. The Data, Information and Documents shall be compiled for the State and arranged by ICL in an accessible format. It is clarified that the purpose of such accessibility by ICL
is the transfer of the information as such to the State and is not the establishment of a data room or information lists for the candidates in the future tender, and the establishment thereof and the management of the information vis-à-vis
the candidates are the responsibility of, and at the expense of, the State.
|
| 7.5. |
ICL shall update the State at the beginning of each calendar year regarding any update in the Data, Information and Documents. It is emphasized that the Data, Information and Documents as aforesaid shall be provided without requiring their
specification by the State. Without derogating from the foregoing, the State shall be entitled to require an explanation or further detail in relation to such data or additional information details related to the Concession activity. ICL
shall make the required information available within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed 90 calendar days, and subject to the information being available or being capable of being made available with reasonable effort and
without an investment of resources that would impair the ordinary course of business of the companies.
|
| 7.6. |
Nothing in any processing, report or review that may be carried out by the State or anyone on its behalf, or by any other party, in connection therewith, if and to the extent conducted, shall impose any liability whatsoever on the Dead Sea
Companies or anyone on their behalf.
|
| 7.7. |
All Data, Information and Documents that will be provided to the State pursuant to this Section, or that have already been provided to the State for the purpose of the process of Concession expiration process and the State’s initiation of
a process for granting a new concession, are provided and have been provided by the Dead Sea Companies as information whose non-disclosure is a condition for its provision by the Dead Sea Companies, within the meaning of Section 9(7) of the
Freedom of Information Law, 5758-1998, and the provisions of Section 117 of the Penal Law, 5737-1977, and Chapter 42.5 of the Civil Service Regulations shall apply.
|
| 7.8. |
Option to conduct due diligence by the State:
|
| 7.8.1. |
The State may conduct a due diligence review (Vendor DD Report) in relation to the Concession activity, in whole or in part, for the purpose of a future tender for the granting of the Dead Sea Concession. The Dead Sea Companies shall fully
cooperate, in an accepted and reasonable manner, with the State or anyone appointed by it for this purpose, also with respect to information that has already been provided to the State.
|
| 7.8.2. |
The State shall allow ICL to respond to the due diligence review, in the manner and at the time to be determined by it. If the State does not make changes in accordance with ICL’s response to the due diligence review, it shall attach ICL’s
comments to the due diligence report.
|
| 7.8.3. |
If the State decides to prepare a due diligence report as stated in this Section, the Dead Sea Companies shall have no claim in connection therewith, including regarding its conclusions or the manner of its preparation, all subject to the
fulfillment of all confidentiality arrangements specified in this Agreement, including as a condition for delivering such report to any party, and the fulfillment of the provisions of Section 7.9.2 above. It is further clarified that the due
diligence report shall not impose any liability whatsoever on the Dead Sea Companies or anyone on their behalf.
|
| 8. |
Disclosure of Information to Tender Participants and Performance of Reviews by Them
|
| 8.1. |
The State shall disclose the Data, Information and Documents, in whole or in part, as part of the Future Concession allocation process, whether through tender or any other competitive process, to the participants, all in accordance with
the provisions of this Agreement, including the conditions and limitations governing the provision of the Data, Information and Documents.
|
| 8.2. |
In addition, participants in such tender shall be entitled to conduct their own reviews of the Existing Concession Assets, at the times and in accordance with the rules that will be determined in the tender, including conducting site
visits to the operational facilities and plants, and performing engineering, technological, economic, environmental, accounting and legal reviews, whether by themselves or through advisors on their behalf. These reviews shall be carried out
at the participants’ own expense and responsibility and no payment shall be made to the Dead Sea Companies or ICL in connection therewith. The site visits and reviews shall be coordinated in advance with the Dead Sea Companies and ICL and
shall be conducted in accordance with all safety rules customary at ICL, and in a manner that will not harm the regular and ongoing operations of the companies. It is further clarified that, the reviews shall be concentrated, as much as
possible, within a limited number of visit days in order not to harm or disrupt the routine operations of the companies and the plants.
|
| 8.3. |
Subject to the provisions of Section 8.2 above, the Dead Sea Companies and ICL shall permit the tender participants to perform the reviews as stated, and shall make available appropriate professional personnel who are familiar with the
facility being reviewed, for professional assistance during the visit.
|
| 8.4. |
It is agreed between the Parties that a condition for the disclosure of Data, Information and Documents to tender participants or in any process for granting a future concession, shall be the execution by the participant, and anyone on its
behalf who is exposed to such information, of a confidentiality undertaking, in the form attached as Appendix E.
|
| 8.5. |
Data, Information and Documents to be defined as having special commercial sensitivity:
|
| 8.5.1. |
If the Dead Sea Companies or ICL believe, in good faith and reasonably, that a Data, Information or Document provided by them to the State under this Agreement has special commercial sensitivity which, in their opinion, should not be
disclosed in its raw form to participants in such tender, they shall notify the State accordingly together with the provision of the information to the State, or no later than 90 calendar days after the provision of the information. Such
request shall be submitted in a reasoned manner and with an explanation of what raw information has such special sensitivity.
|
| 8.5.2. |
In any event, ICL shall be entitled to approach the State, in good faith and reasonably, with a request to classify as confidential any Data, Information or Document that has already been provided to the State, by way of a reasoned
request, provided that the information has not yet been delivered to a participant.
|
| 8.5.3. |
In accordance with ICL’s position as specified in Section 8.5.1 above, such document shall be defined as having special commercial sensitivity. The Parties agree that information defined as having special commercial sensitivity shall be
provided to tender participants in a manner that does not disclose sensitive commercial details. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for special and reasoned grounds, the State may object to ICL’s position as aforesaid, and if it chooses to do so
it shall provide its reasons in advance and in writing to ICL, in order for ICL to decide, within a period not exceeding 7 business days, whether it wishes to refer the matter to dispute resolution as specified in Section 11 below. The State
shall not disclose the information having special commercial sensitivity until a decision is made in such dispute.
|
| 8.5.4. |
The State, in its sole discretion, may appoint an external professional, to be appointed by the State and shall work in coordination with ICL, and who will sign a confidentiality undertaking, that will be exposed to the full information
subject to a confidentiality undertaking. In such case, the person appointed by the State shall process the information and prepare for the tender participants a summary document or data, in a manner that does not disclose the raw data having
special commercial sensitivity or in a manner that will keep it from direct disclosure to competitors of the ICL Group (including by disclosing it to a “clean team” on behalf of the tender participants).
|
| 8.5.5. |
It is clarified that the foregoing does not derogate from the obligation of the Dead Sea Companies and ICL to provide to the State all Data, Information and Documents in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
|
| 8.6. |
Disclosure of information to tender participants shall not derogate from the provisions of Section 8.4 regarding confidentiality of the information. In addition, insofar as the participant is a competitor of any of the Dead Sea Companies
or ICL, the information shall be delivered in a manner and subject to the provisions and rules of the relevant local law and foreign law, including Opinion 2/14 of the Competition Authority or any updated or other provision with respect to
the transfer of information between competitors for the purpose of due diligence. The State shall be responsible for complying with such provisions.
|
| 9. |
Additional Agreements and Undertakings of the Parties
|
| 9.1. |
Cancellation of the right of first offer: The Dead Sea Companies or ICL shall not object to
the cancellation of Section 25 of the Existing Concession Deed and the right of first offer set forth therein, and shall not act in connection therewith, directly or indirectly, including assisting, encouraging or soliciting any third party
to act against such cancellation. In addition, the Dead Sea Companies or ICL shall not object to the State’s initiation of a tender for the purpose of granting the Future Concession. The waiver of the right of first offer does not
constitute a waiver of the right to participate in the tender, as specified in Section 9.4 below.
|
| 9.2. |
Transfer of obligations to employees of the Dead Sea Companies or ICL:
|
| 9.2.1. |
To the extent that any employees of the Dead Sea Companies or ICL transfer to work for the Future Concession Holder while maintaining continuity of rights (the “Transferring Employees”), on the date
of the transfer of ownership and possession of the Assets (the “Effective Date”), the Dead Sea Companies or ICL shall transfer to the Future Concession Holder the full amounts owed by the Dead Sea
Companies or ICL by law and agreement to the Transferring Employees (including actuarial liabilities for severance, early retirement, vacation and any other liability) (the “Accrued Rights of the Employees”),
as of the Effective Date, in cash or by transfer of designated funds existing for the benefit of the Transferring Employees. It is clarified that the Dead Sea Companies or ICL shall not bear liability toward the employees who transfer to the
Future Concession Holder in respect of their rights, demands and claims on legal causes of action that arose after the Effective Date.
|
| 9.2.2. |
In any case of dispute between the Future Concession Holder and ICL regarding the amount of the Accrued Rights of the Employees as stated in Section 9.2.1, ICL agrees that the dispute shall be resolved between it and the Future Concession
Holder in an arbitration proceeding in accordance with the provisions of Section 11 below, with the necessary adaptation as the State is not a party to the proceeding.
|
| 9.3. |
Use of the ports in Ashdod and Eilat: ICL shall cooperate with Israel Ports Company –
Development and Assets Ltd., for the implementation of the solution to be determined by the State, which will enable the Future Concession Holder and the companies in the ICL Group currently using the port berths in Ashdod and Eilat to use
such port berths on an ongoing, proper, and similarly efficient manner.
|
| 9.4. |
ICL’s participation in the Tender: In view of ICL’s agreement not to object to the
cancellation of the right of first offer as detailed in Section 9.1 above, nothing in the provisions of this Agreement shall prevent or prejudice the right of the Dead Sea Companies or ICL, similar to any other similar participant, to
participate in the Tender for the granting of the Future Concession.
|
| 9.5. |
Downstream industries activity: For the purpose of providing certainty for the downstream
industry activity for the Future Concession Holder and ICL (including the companies operating in the downstream industries fields), and in order to ensure operational continuity for the downstream activities, Appendix F sets forth operational agreements which shall be assigned to the Future Concession Holder as specified below in Section 10.
|
| 10. |
Assignment of Agreements from the Dead Sea Companies to the Future Concession Holder
|
| 10.1. |
The Parties agree that the operational agreements required for the operation of the Concession and attached as a list in Appendix F (the “Operational Agreements”)
to this Agreement shall be assigned by the Dead Sea Companies or ICL to the Future Concession Holder.
|
| 10.2. |
For the purpose of implementing the provisions of this Section, the State shall establish a normative framework that will enable the assignment of such Operational Agreements to the Future Concession Holder, such that it will assume the
position of the Dead Sea Companies or ICL in connection with the Operational Agreements.
|
| 11. |
Dispute Resolution
|
| 11.1. |
The Parties agree that in any case of a dispute in connection with this Agreement, including its performance, enforcement and breach, the Parties shall act so that such dispute shall first be brought for a joint determination by the
Accountant General and the CEO of ICL within 10 business days:
|
| 11.2. |
If they do not reach a determination, the dispute shall be brought for resolution in an arbitration proceeding, in accordance with the provisions of Section 26 of the Existing Concession Deed, as detailed below:
|
| 11.2.1. |
The Parties shall appoint the arbitrators in accordance with the provisions of Section 26 of the Existing Concession Deed by the end of 2026.
|
| 11.2.2. |
The arbitration shall be resolved within 90 days from the date on which the referral was received from the party to the Agreement that believes there for a dispute exists requiring determination under this Agreement. The Parties shall
adjust themselves and conduct the arbitration within a timetable that will allow a decision to be rendered within this timeframe.
|
| 11.2.3. |
The arbitrators shall not be bound by rules of procedure, but shall be bound by substantive law and shall be required to provide reasons for their award.
|
| 12. |
Notices under the Agreement
|
| 12.1. |
Any notice under this Agreement shall be delivered by email, unless the Parties agree otherwise; such notice by email shall be deemed received upon receipt of a “read receipt”, or after 3 days from the date of the email delivery
confirmation was issued, whichever is earlier.
|
| 12.2. |
Email notices under this Agreement shall be sent to the following addresses:
|
| 12.2.1. |
State Email Address: will be the address of Tamar Farhi, Senior Manager of the Dead Sea Concession at the Accountant General, or any other email address updated by the State.
|
| 12.2.2. |
ICL Email Address: will be the address of Michael Dahan, CFO of ICL Israel, or any other email address updated by ICL.
|
| 12.3. |
Any material notice under this Agreement (such as notices regarding delays, deviations in the consideration, claims of breach, urgent matters, etc.) shall be delivered by email and accompanied by a telephone call to the official
representative in order to confirm receipt of the email.
|
| 12.4. |
A sending confirmation from the email mailbox shall serve as evidence of the date of sending. A read receipt shall serve as evidence of the date of delivery.
|
| 13. |
Miscellaneous
|
| 13.1. |
Except for Appendices B, C and D, which include commercially sensitive information of the Dead Sea Companies and which has been defined by the Parties as confidential, this Agreement is not
confidential and each Party may disclose it at its sole discretion, in accordance with any law.
|
| 13.2. |
The Parties’ representatives for the purpose of implementing this Agreement shall be as specified below:
|
| 13.2.1. |
Representative of the Accountant General Division – from the Economic Ministries Division, or another representative to be chosen by the Accountant General.
|
| 13.2.2. |
ICL representative – the Dead Sea Companies and ICL shall appoint an authorized representative on their behalf who will serve as their representative vis-à-vis the State for the performance of the obligations of the Dead Sea Companies and
ICL under this Agreement. The Dead Sea Companies and ICL may replace the authorized representative by written notice (by all of them jointly) to the State given at least 14 days in advance.
|
| 13.3. |
Any change, amendment or update to this Agreement shall have no effect unless made in writing and signed by the Parties.
|
| 13.4. |
This Agreement is made solely between the Parties and not for the benefit of any third party, and it does not grant any third party any right upon vis-à-vis either of the Parties thereto or at all. In addition, this Agreement exhausts the
State’s claims towards the Dead Sea Companies and ICL in connection with the end of the Existing Concession period.
|
| 13.5. |
This Agreement constitutes the full and complete agreement between the Parties with respect to the matters included herein, and it replaces, with respect to the matters included herein, any agreement, representation, declaration, consent,
correspondence or undertaking, whether written or oral, given (if given) or made (if made) prior to the signing date, that is not expressly included in this Agreement, and any such agreement, representation, declaration, consent,
correspondence or undertaking shall have no effect. Previous drafts of this Agreement shall not serve as a tool for its interpretation.
|
|
The Accountant General, on behalf of the
Government of Israel
|
||
|
Dead Sea Works Ltd.
|
ICL Group Ltd.
|
|
|
Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd.
|
Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd.
|
| 14. |
Introduction
|
| 14.1. |
Until the Concession Expiry Date, the Dead Sea Companies shall continue their activities under the Existing Concession and shall operate the Existing Concession Assets in a similar manner to the way they operated them prior to this
Procedure entry into force.
|
| 14.2. |
This Appendix replaces the procedure dated March 23, 2020, titled “Process for examining investments of Dead Sea Works Ltd. from 2020 until the end of the concession period” (the “2020 Procedure”).
As of the date of signing the Agreement to which this Appendix is attached, the 2020 Procedure is cancelled and shall have no force and effect with respect to any investment made from the date of signing the Agreement onward, and with
respect to investments made in 2025. Nothing herein shall derogate from the validity of the provisions of the 2020 Procedure and its appendices with respect to the period prior to 2025.
|
| 14.3. |
This Appendix does not derogate from, and does not replace, the provisions of the Salt Harvesting Agreement, including with respect to investments and maintenance expenses for the purpose of performing the Salt Harvesting Agreement and
with respect to the participation of the State or ICL therein.
|
| 15. |
Maintenance of Production Capacity and Scope of Activity
|
| 15.1. |
Until the Concession Expiry Date, the Dead Sea Companies shall continue their activities under the Concession and shall maintain the current production capacity of the Dead Sea products, such that the Dead Sea production capacity shall not
materially decrease compared to the average production capacity over the past five years.
|
| 15.2. |
Without derogating from the generality of the foregoing, the Dead Sea Companies undertake to continue business operations as follows:
|
| 15.2.1. |
During the period from January 1, 2028, until the Concession Expiry Date, the Dead Sea Companies shall continue to produce potassium chloride from the Dead Sea in an amount of not less than an average of 3.3 million tons per year.
|
| 15.2.2. |
During the period from January 1, 2028, until the Concession Expiry Date, the Dead Sea Companies shall continue to produce elemental bromine in accordance with the production capacity of the plant and in accordance with the economic
feasibility of producing this product, and in a manner that preserves at least the plant’s operational capability level.
|
| 16. |
Investments and Maintenance in the Existing Concession Assets
|
| 16.1. |
Without derogating from the generality of the provisions of Section 3.11 above, from January 1, 2025 until the transfer of ownership and possession of the Existing Concession Assets, the Dead Sea Companies shall carry out investments and
maintenance in the Existing Concession Assets as they did prior to the signing of the MOU, such that the total investments and maintenance shall satisfy all of the following:
|
| 16.1.1. |
In a net amount of USD 292 million (USD 292,000,000) per year, measured on a multi-year average, from January 1, 2025, until the date of the transfer of ownership and possession of the Existing Concession Assets (or a pro rata amount in
the case of a partial year) (the “Total Expenditure Amount”);
|
| 16.1.2. |
Not less than a net amount of USD 230 million (USD 230,000,000) in each single (solo) year (or a pro rata amount in the case of a partial year) (the “Minimum Expenditure Amount”);
|
| 16.1.3. |
The amount of investments on a multi-year average basis shall be at least within the range of between USD 140 million (USD 140,000,000) and USD 185 million (USD 185,000,000) (the “Minimum Investment Amount”).
|
| 16.2. |
The examination of the Total Expenditure Amount and the Minimum Investment Amount shall be carried out on the reconciliation dates specified below, on a multi-year average, and subject to annual compliance with the Minimum Expenditure
Amount.
|
| 16.3. |
Effect of Investments on the Main Consideration:
|
| 16.3.1. |
Reduction mechanism for the Main Consideration:
|
| 16.3.1.1. |
If by the date of the transfer of ownership and possession of the Existing Concession Assets the Dead Sea Companies do not carry out investments and maintenance in accordance with the
undertakings set forth in Section 16.1 above, the consideration shall be reduced, as specified below:
|
| 16.3.1.1.1. |
For each year in which the Dead Sea Companies did not meet the Minimum Expenditure Amount set forth in Section 16.1.2, the consideration shall be reduced by an amount equal to the difference between the expenditure amount by the Dead Sea
Companies in that year and the Minimum Expenditure Amount. The reduction amount shall be calculated separately for each year until the Concession Expiry Date.
|
| 16.3.1.1.2. |
If, upon the Concession Expiry Date, the multi-year average of the actual total expenditure is lower than the Total Expenditure Amount set forth in Section 16.1.1, the consideration shall be reduced by the difference between the actual
total expenditure and the Total Expenditure Amount for the years 2025 through the first quarter of 2030. For example, if the multi-year average of the actual Total Expenditure Amount was USD 290 million (USD 290,000,000) instead of USD 292
million (USD 292,000,000), the difference of USD 2 million (USD 2,000,000) shall be multiplied by 5.25 (the number of years under the procedure), such that the Main Consideration shall be reduced by a total amount of USD 10.5 million (USD
10,500,000).
|
| 16.3.2. |
Increase mechanism for the Main Consideration:
|
| 16.3.2.1. |
If by the date of the transfer of ownership and possession of the Existing Concession Assets the Dead Sea Companies carry out investments and maintenance in excess of the Total Expenditure Amount, the Dead Sea Companies shall be entitled
to an increase of the Main Consideration in a maximum aggregate net amount of up to USD 100 million (USD 100,000,000) (the “Excess Expenditure Amount”), provided that the following cumulative conditions
are met:
|
| 16.3.2.1.1. |
The Dead Sea Companies carried out investments and maintenance in an amount exceeding the Minimum Expenditure Amount in the year in which the expenditure is examined;
|
| 16.3.2.1.2. |
The investment component was at least USD 170 million (USD 170,000,000) on a multi-year average;
|
| 16.3.2.1.3. |
Notwithstanding the fact that there is no requirement to approve an annual investment plan under this Procedure, in any case of excess investment as stated in this Section, it is required that the Excess Expenditure Amount be made subject
to the State’s prior approval of the investment;
|
| 16.3.2.1.4. |
None of the Dead Sea Companies or ICL, or any company or party having a corporate affiliation with the Dead Sea Companies or ICL, shall be the Future Concession Holder.
|
| 16.3.2.2. |
For example, subject to satisfaction of the cumulative conditions set forth in Section 16.3.2.1, if the multi-year average of the actual Total Expenditure Amount were USD 294,000,000 (USD 294 million), rather than USD 292,000,000 (USD 292
million), the resulting difference of USD 2,000,000 (USD 2 million) would be multiplied by 5.25 (being the number of years in the Procedure), such that the Main Consideration would increase by an aggregate amount of USD 10,500,000 (USD 10.5
million).
|
| 16.3.2.3. |
In addition to the Excess Expenditure Amount, and provided cumulative compliance with the conditions set forth in subsections 16.3.2.1.1 through 16.3.2.1.4, the Dead Sea Companies shall be entitled to an increase of the Main Consideration
if the expenditure was required due to the occurrence of one of the following:
|
| 16.3.2.3.1. |
Investments required as a result of all of the following together: (1) material damage caused to an asset of the Existing Concession Assets, the failure to repair which may cause a material adverse impact to the Existing Concession
activity; and (2) that was caused as a result of an unforeseen event that is exceptional in its nature, scope and impact on the Concession activity; and (3) that is not reasonably foreseeable and cannot be prepared for in advance (including
through the purchase of insurance, hedging and etc.); and (4) that does not exist, is not known or is not expected as of the signing date of this Agreement; and (5) the failure to make the investment therein will cause a material adverse
impact on the Existing Concession activity; and (6) that is not subject to compensation, indemnification, reimbursement or participation, in full, directly or indirectly, from any party other than the Dead Sea Companies or ICL themselves,
whether or not the Dead Sea Companies or ICL asserted their rights toward such party. If the amount is compensable, indemnifiable or subject to reimbursement in part as stated in this Section, the increase of the Main Consideration shall not
apply to the part in respect of which the ICL Group is entitled to compensation, indemnification or reimbursement; and (7) not more than its net amount;
|
| 16.3.2.3.2. |
Investments required as a result of all of the following together: (1) an expenditure required for a material asset among the Existing Concession Assets, arising as a result of a legal provision or a licensing requirement that, as of the
execution date of this Agreement, does not exist or is not known (including as a draft that was published or came to the attention of the Dead Sea Companies or ICL); and (2) the failure to make the investment therein will cause a material
adverse impact on the Existing Concession activity; and (3) that is not compensable, indemnifiable, refundable or subject to participation, in full, directly or indirectly, by any party other than the Dead Sea Companies or ICL themselves,
whether or not the Dead Sea Companies or ICL asserted their rights with respect to such party. If the amount is compensable, indemnifiable or refundable in part as stated in this Section, the increase of the main consideration shall not apply
to the part in respect of which the Dead Sea Companies or ICL are entitled to compensation, indemnification or refund; and (4) not more than its net amount.
|
| 16.4. |
The term “net” in this Appendix means: (a) excluding VAT; and (b) without any capitalization of any kind, except for capitalization in an amount not exceeding USD 40 million (USD 40,000,000) per year
net (USD 20 million net in maintenance and USD 20 million net in investments) which shall remain and be included in the Total Expenditure Amount required for investments and maintenance.
|
| 17. |
Investments in Respect with the Salt Harvesting Agreement
|
| 17.1. |
The Total Expenditure Amount and anything derived therefrom shall not include expenses of any kind related to the Salt Harvesting Agreement, and such expenses shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.1.2 of the
Agreement and below.
|
| 17.2. |
A condition for making any investment in the establishment of assets for the Permanent Solution for salt harvesting under the Salt Harvesting Agreement (a “Harvesting Investment”) is obtaining the
State’s prior written approval, in its discretion.
|
| 17.3. |
Approval Request: With respect to each new Harvesting Investment, DSW or anyone on its behalf
shall submit to the Accountant General a request for its approval (the “Approval Request”), which shall include all of the following details: (a) the nature of the Harvesting Investment (efficiency,
increase in output, regulation and safety, infrastructure and preservation of existing condition); (b) alternatives examined for making the Harvesting Investment and its cost, including professional opinions, if any; (c) the expected
monetary scope of the Harvesting Investment; (d) the expected duration for carrying out the Harvesting Investment; (e) the expected scope of maintenance as a result of the Harvesting Investment under review; (f) an estimate of the useful
life of the Harvesting Investment; (g) an estimated ROI [internal rate of return before tax], if any, disregarding the possible change of the Concession Holder upon the Concession Expiry Date and the State’s payment in respect of the
Existing Concession Assets (under Section 5.1.1 of the Agreement); i.e., for the entire period of the Harvesting Investment (namely, not on the basis of a forecasted cash flow until the end of 2030 plus the calculation of a one-time amount
of reimbursement of the Harvesting Investment at the end of the period); (h) an explanation regarding the risks of not carrying out the requested Harvesting Investment and the necessity of the Harvesting Investment for the purpose of
performing the Salt Harvesting Agreement; (i) any additional clarification requested by the Accountant General.
|
| 17.4. |
Approval by the State Representative: (a) the Accountant General or anyone on his behalf
shall conduct an examination process for making Harvesting Investments, within reasonable timetables that will not harm the Existing Concession and will enable the establishment of the Permanent Solution under the Salt Harvesting Agreement
by the date set forth in Section 5.2 of the Agreement above; (b) the Accountant General or anyone on his behalf shall provide his consent or non-consent to carrying out the Approval Request within 60 days from the date of receipt of the
request; (c) in the event of an operational emergency at the Company’s facilities in which it is required to carry out a Harvesting Investment immediately, the Company shall notify the Accountant General or anyone on his behalf regarding
the operational emergency and shall act to immediately remedy the malfunction. In such case, the Accountant General or anyone on his behalf shall consider the Approval Request retroactively in accordance with the principles of this
Procedure.
|
| 18. |
Reporting, Review, Control and Approval by the State of the Performance of the Provisions Above
|
| 18.1. |
Interim reconciliation for the years 2025-2028:
|
| 18.1.1. |
The parties shall conduct interim reconciliations on the following dates:
|
| 18.1.1.1. |
in 2027 – for the years 2025-2026;
|
| 18.1.1.2. |
in 2029 – for the years 2027-2028;
|
| 18.1.2. |
For the purposes of the interim reconciliation, the Dead Sea Companies or ICL shall provide ongoing reporting, as detailed below:
|
| 18.1.2.1. |
By April 1 of the relevant year, ICL shall submit the report attached as Appendix G regarding the scope of investments and maintenance for the relevant years in respect of the Main Consideration, as
well as details of all Harvesting Investments carried out by it in the relevant years. As part of the report, ICL shall distinguish between the harvesting project and the other investments.
|
| 18.1.2.2. |
If, in the State’s view, the Dead Sea Companies did not comply with the reporting requirements, the State shall notify as soon as possible so that the Dead Sea Companies may correct or supplement the report as required. As part of the
request for supplement, the State shall detail the deficiencies it seeks to have supplemented.
|
| 18.1.2.3. |
From the date of the supplement request, ICL shall act to complete the documents within a reasonable period of time not exceeding 45 calendar days.
|
| 18.1.3. |
The State shall conduct oversight of the investments in accordance with the provisions of this Procedure, shall be entitled to carry out any reasonable review, shall request clarifications and additions required for this purpose, and shall
deliver the results of the reconciliation for those years to the Dead Sea Companies by November 1 of that year (the “Interim Reconciliation Amount”). If there is no agreement regarding the amount of the
Interim Reconciliation Amount, either Party may, prior to the end of that year, refer the matter to the dispute resolution process, as specified in Section 11.
|
| 18.1.4. |
Subject to the foregoing, the Interim Reconciliation Amount shall be final, and the Parties shall not raise claims after the amount has been determined as stated in this Section.
|
| 18.2. |
Reconciliation for 2029 and the first quarter of 2030:
|
| 18.2.1. |
For 2029 and the first quarter of 2030, instead of an interim reconciliation, ICL shall provide, by January 1, 2029, an investment plan for those years (the “Final Investment Plan”) which shall
include details regarding investments and maintenance pursuant to Section 16 above, as well as details regarding Harvesting Investments pursuant to Section 17 above. Following such investment plan, ICL undertakes that any material change in
the actual investments as compared to the investment plan shall be reported to the State as soon as possible, including details regarding the reasons for the change and the impact of the change on the scope of the investments. A Final
Investment Plan as stated in this Section shall constitute an alternative to an interim reconciliation for these years.
|
| 18.2.2. |
By April 15, 2030, ICL shall provide an actual performance report of investments and maintenance, as well as Harvesting Investments, carried out in the Concession for 2029, and by June 1, 2030, ICL shall provide an actual performance
report of investments and maintenance, as well as Harvesting Investments, carried out in the Concession for the first quarter of 2030, all with details regarding the actual performance of the Final Investment Plan as specified in Section
18.2.1.
|
| 18.2.3. |
The State shall conduct oversight over the actual performance of the Final Investment Plan and compliance with the Total Expenditure Amount, in accordance with the provisions of this Procedure, shall be entitled to carry out any reasonable
review, and shall deliver the reconciliation results to the Dead Sea Companies. Such notice by the State shall be delivered no later than August 1 of that year.
|
| 18.2.4. |
If there is no agreement regarding the reconciliation amount, either Party may, by August 31, 2030, refer the matter to the dispute resolution process, as specified in Section 11. In such referral, the State may request that the
arbitrators order to withhold the execution of the portion in dispute from the remaining balance of the Total Consideration.
|
| 19. |
Review of the Existing Concession Assets by the State:
|
| 19.1. |
The State shall be entitled, but not obligated, from time to time and whenever it deems fit, throughout the entire term of this Agreement, to review all of the Existing Concession Assets, under any customary review applicable in asset sale
transactions (including engineering, technological, economic, accounting, environmental and legal reviews), whether by itself or through anyone on its behalf (including its advisors), provided that the foregoing does not harm the ordinary and
ongoing course of operations.
|
| 19.2. |
The Dead Sea Companies shall enable and cooperate with such reviews, including by making available appropriate professional personnel familiar with the asset in connection with which the review is conducted, for the purpose of providing
professional explanations.
|
| 19.3. |
The reviews shall be carried out at the State’s expense and responsibility, and no consideration shall be paid to the Dead Sea Companies in connection therewith. However, the performance of reviews by the State shall not derogate from the
responsibility of the Dead Sea Companies under this Agreement in connection with the Existing Concession Assets.
|
| 20. |
Miscellaneous
|
| 20.1. |
The provisions of Section 7.7 and all other provisions in the Agreement relating to maintaining the confidentiality of information shall also apply to the information delivered in connection with the 2020 Procedure and to the information
to be delivered pursuant to this Procedure.
|
| 20.2. |
This procedure is not intended to confer any rights on third parties.
|
| 20.3. |
Disputes between the Parties in connection with this Procedure shall be resolved in accordance with Section 11 above.
|
| 21. |
List of Attached Files:
|
| 21.1. |
Fixed Asset List as of December 31, 2024;
|
| 21.2. |
List of Intangible Assets;
|
| 21.3. |
List of Patents.
|
| 1. |
I _______________________, ID __________________, whose position with ____________________ __________________________________ [insert company name] (the "Company"), is ____________________, provide
this undertaking in connection with the receipt of information as part of the process conducted by the State for the purpose of granting a new concession for the extraction of resources from the Dead Sea (the “Concession”
and the “Concession Process”):
|
| 2. |
In this undertaking, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth next to them:
|
| 3. |
I hereby undertake to keep the Information and the Trade Secrets that come to my possession as a result of the Concession Process or the Concession, in absolute confidence, and to make use of them solely for the purpose of submitting a bid
in the tender and operating the Concession, if I win the tender (the “Permitted Use”). In this context, I shall not make any commercial use or any other use of the Information or the Trade Secrets in
order to harm, or affect, the business operations of ICL or any of its subsidiaries in any manner.
|
| 4. |
Without derogating from the generality of the foregoing, I undertake not to publish, transfer, notify, deliver or bring to the knowledge of any person or entity, whether by act or omission, whether directly or indirectly, the Information
or the Trade Secrets that came to my attention as a result of the Agreement or the Concession Process or the Concession, except for information required to be delivered pursuant to any law. If, pursuant to law, I am required to disclose the
Information and/or the Trade Secrets, I undertake to notify the Accountant General and ICL immediately, in order to enable ICL to take all measures to protect the confidentiality of the Information and/or the Trade Secrets, and in any event I
shall disclose only the portion expressly required pursuant to law and only after I take all the actions stated above.
|
| 5. |
It is known to me that the Dead Sea Companies or ICL or anyone on their behalf do not provide any representation, undertaking or warranty of any kind to you and/or to any other participant with respect to the Information or the Trade
Secrets, their degree of accuracy or merchantability, or their suitability for any use or purpose. The Information or the Trade Secrets are provided “as is".
|
| 6. |
In addition, it is hereby clarified that ICL is a public company whose shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange, and that some of the Information or the Trade Secrets may constitute “inside
information” under the securities laws applicable in Israel and the United States; therefore, I declare that I am aware that my undertaking herein is also an undertaking not to deliver “inside information” to any other person and, of course,
not to make any use thereof for my benefit and/or for the benefit of any other person (except for the Permitted Use as defined above). In addition, it is clarified that the Information and/or the Trade Secrets may include competitively
sensitive information between competitors; therefore, I declare that I am aware that my undertaking herein is also an undertaking not to breach obligations under any law relating to competition laws concerning the receipt of competitors’
information and the prohibition to make use thereof other than for the Permitted Use and subject to the limitations under law. It is known to me that the disclosure of the Information or the Trade Secrets, or the use thereof, other than for
the Permitted Use (as defined above), may cause significant damage to the Dead Sea Companies, ICL and anyone on their behalf. I undertake that I will refrain from any action that may create an appearance or an obligation to deliver
Information or Trade Secrets, directly or indirectly.
|
| 24. |
List of approved Operational Agreements:
|
| 24.1. |
An agreement signed between Dead Sea Works Ltd. and Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd., regarding the regulation of the purchase of water to be produced from the Efeh Well in Mishor Rotem, based on water fees tariff rates;
|
| 24.2. |
An agreement signed between Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd. and Bromine Compounds Ltd., regarding the purchase of elemental bromine;
|
| 24.3. |
An agreement signed between Dead Sea Works Ltd. and Dead Sea Bromine Company Ltd., regarding the purchase of brine for the purpose of the operation of the Periclase plants in Mishor Rotem.
|
| 25. |
List of Operational Agreements to be approved in the future, subject to the consent of the relevant third party:
|
| 25.1. |
An agreement to be signed between the Dead Sea Companies and Israel Railways regarding the Zefa conveyor and transportation of products produced in the Dead Sea activity;
|
| 25.2. |
Agreements to be signed between the Dead Sea Companies and a supplier regarding the construction of harvesters, the construction of a conveyor and any other agreement related to the establishment of the permanent solution of the harvesting
project;
|
| 25.3. |
An agreement to be signed between the Dead Sea Companies and Mifalei Tovala Ltd. regarding transportation of the products of the Concession activity.
|
| 26. |
Additional Operational Agreements:
|
| 26.1. |
The Dead Sea Companies may submit a request to the State to approve additional operational agreements to be assigned to a Future Concession Holder, provided that such agreements serve the purpose of maintaining or increasing the value of
the Concession.
|
| 26.2. |
The State’s approval of additional operational agreements shall be given prior to the singing of the operational agreement that is the subject of the request.
|
| 1. |
In this report, the breakdown of investments by plants, shall be in accordance with the manner they are recorded in the Company’s books.
|
| 2. |
This report shall be accompanied by a certification of an external auditor.
|
|
Company
|
Plant
|
Total
|
|
Dead Sea Works
|
Hot Leach
|
|
|
Cold Leach
|
||
|
Granulation
|
||
|
Raw Materials
|
||
|
Chemical
|
||
|
Equipment & IT Systems
|
||
|
Tzefa
|
||
|
Production Services
|
||
|
Power Plant
|
||
|
Other
|
||
|
Total - Dead Sea Works
|
||
|
Dead Sea Bromine
|
Machinery and Facilities
|
|
|
Total – Bromine
|
||
|
Dead Sea Magnesium
|
Cell Renovation
|
|
|
Machinery and Facilities
|
||
|
Environmental
|
||
|
Total – Magnesium
|
||
|
Total Investments Performed by the Dead Sea Companies
|
||
|
Capitalized Amount Out of Total Investments
|
||
|
Company
|
Section
|
Total
|
|
Dead Sea Works
|
Maintenance expenses
|
|
|
Dead Sea Bromine
|
Maintenance expenses
|
|
|
Dead Sea Magnesium
|
Maintenance expenses
|
|
|
Total Maintenance Performed by the Dead Sea Companies
|
||
|
Capitalized Amount Out of Total Maintenance
|
||
|
Company
|
Investments
|
Maintenance
|
Total
|
|
Dead Sea Works
|
|||
|
Dead Sea Bromine
|
|||
|
Dead Sea Magnesium
|
|||
|
Total Performed by the Dead Sea Companies
|