UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2025

☐   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to _____________

Commission File No. 001-42901

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes ☐   No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes ☐   No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ☒   No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes ☒     No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐   No ☒

As of June 30, 2025 (the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter), based upon the last reported trade on that date, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates (for this purpose, all outstanding and issued ordinary shares minus shares held by the officers, directors and known holders of 10% or more of the Company’s ordinary shares) was $0.

As of March 31, 2026, there were a total of 110,500,908 ordinary shares of the registrant issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Terra Innovatum Global N.V.

 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Year Ended December 31, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN TERMS

When used throughout this annual report on Form 10-K, references to:

“Closing” means, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Business Combination Agreement, the consummation of the Business Combination on October 9, 2025.

“Governing Documents” means the legal agreements and instruments by which any Person (other than an individual) establishes its legal existence or which govern its internal affairs. For example, the “Governing Documents” of a corporation are its certificate of incorporation and by-laws, the “Governing Documents” of a limited partnership are its limited partnership agreement and certificate of limited partnership, the “Governing Documents” of a limited liability company are its operating agreement and certificate of formation and the “Governing Documents” of an exempted company are its memorandum and articles of association as amended and or restated from time to time.

“Governmental Authority” means any federal, national, state, provincial, territorial or municipal government, or any political subdivision of such government, and any agency, commission, department, board, bureau, official, minister, arbitral body (public or private), tribunal or court, whether national, state, provincial, local, foreign or multinational, exercising executive, legislative, judicial, regulatory or administrative functions of a nation, state, province or municipal government, or any political subdivision of such authority, including any authority having governmental or quasi-governmental powers, domestic or foreign.

“GSR III” means GSR III Acquisition Corp.

“GSR III Class A Shares” means Class A ordinary shares of GSR III, par value $0.0001 per share.

“GSR III Class B Shares” means Class B ordinary shares of GSR III, par value $0.0001 per share.

“GSR III Private Placement Units” means the units comprised of one GSR III Class A Share and one-seventh of one whole right to receive one GSR III Ordinary Share in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination issued and sold in a private placement simultaneously with GSR III’s initial public offering.

“GSR III Rights” means the right per GSR III Private Placement Unit to purchase one-seventh of one share upon consummation of the Closing.

“GSR III Shares” means GSR III Class A Shares and GSR III Class B Shares, collectively.

“Person” means any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, exempted company, incorporated or unincorporated association, joint venture, joint stock company, bank, trust company, trust or other entity, whether or not a legal entity, Governmental Authority or any department, agency or political subdivision of such Governmental Authority.

“Preferred Conversion Ratio” means 80 (i.e. 8,000 Terra Innovatum Preferred Shares divided by 100 quotas).

“Registration Rights Agreement” means that certain Registration Rights by and between GSR III, the Sponsor, Terra Innovatum and certain other parties.

“Related Party” means any of the current or former directors, officers, employees, managers, members, or equityholders (both indirect and direct) (or any child or spouse of any such Person) of any Terra Entity.

“Sarbanes-Oxley Act” means the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

“SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

“SOLO” means the SOLO micro-modular nuclear reactor.

“SOLO Test Reactor” means the First-Of-A-Kind (FOAK) demonstrative prototype of the SOLO reactor, developed and operated by Terra Innovatum, which is designed, constructed, and operated primarily for testing, research, training, and development purposes. This reactor is a non-power production or utilization facility under a Class 104(c) license pursuant to 10 CFR 50.21(c) of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations.

“Sponsor” means GSR III Sponsor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

“Sponsor Holders” means the Sponsor and certain members of the Sponsor (including the three prior independent directors of GSR III) and certain other former holders of GSR III Class B Shares.

“Subsidiary” means, with respect to a Person, a corporation, general or limited partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, partnership or other entity of which a majority of the economic interests or the voting interests is owned, directly or indirectly, by such Person.

“Terra Ordinary Shares” means ordinary shares in the capital of Terra, par value EUR 0.01 per share, having the terms set forth in Terra’s Governing Documents.

“Terra Preferred Shares” means convertible preferred shares in the capital of Terra, par value EUR 100.00 per share, having the terms set forth in Terra’s Governing Documents.

“U.S. GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States as in effect from time to time.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements contained in this Form 10-K, other than statements of historical fact, are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to us. These statements relate to future events or to our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “could,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “project” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect results. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those listed under Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual events or results may vary significantly from those implied or projected by the forward-looking statements. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance.

In addition, statements that “we believe”, “we expect”, “we anticipate” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this report, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely upon these statements.

The forward-looking statements made in this report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this report. Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, there is no undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits to this report with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report.

Trademarks, Trade Names and Service Marks

We own or have rights to trademarks, service marks and trade names that we use in connection with the operation of our business, including our corporate name, logos and website names. Other trademarks, service marks and trade names appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, some of the trademarks, service marks and trade names referred to in this report are listed without the ^® and ™ symbols, but we will assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights to our trademarks, service marks and trade names. This report may include trademarks, service marks and trade names owned by us or other companies. All trademarks, service marks and trade names included in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners.

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

The following is only a summary of the principal risks that may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The following summary should be read in conjunction with the complete discussion of risk factors we face, which are set forth below under “—Risk Factors.”

Risks Relating to Terra Innovatum’s Business

Risks Relating to Terra Innovatum’s Capital Resources

Risks Relating to Compliance with Law, Government Regulation and Litigation

Risks Relating to Tax Matters Applicable to Terra Innovatum

Risks Related to Ownership of Terra Shares and Terra Operating as a Public Company

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

The Company

Terra Innovatum Global N.V. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Terra,” “Terra Innovatum” or the “Company”) was formed in connection with Terra Innovatum Global s.r.l.’s conversion into a Dutch public limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap), as contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, and is headquartered in Lucca, Italy. Terra is a leading micro-modular nuclear solutions company that aims to deliver reliable, low-cost and zero-carbon power wherever energy demand is present through its first-of-a-kind reactor SOLO. SOLO is compact yet extremely powerful with one unit generating 1MWe of power, while designed with significant safety characteristics and the ability to run 24/7 without the need to refuel for 15 years. Its modular design aims to achieve maximum energy efficiency while significantly reducing the levelized cost of energy (LCOE). SOLO is built predominantly using off-the-shelf components and widely available fuel, low-enriched uranium (“LEU”), which de-risks its regulatory and commercial pathway. Terra Innovatum aims to deploy SOLO by 2028 to address the growing global demand for sustainable and reliable energy.

Business Combination

On October 9, 2025, we consummated our previously announced business combination with GSR III Acquisition Corp. (“GSR III”), pursuant to the business combination agreement (the “Business Combination Agreement”), dated April 21, 2025, between GSR III and Terra Innovatum s.r.l., an Italian limited liability company (Italian Società a responsabilità limitata) (“Terra OpCo”), which contemplated several transactions and reorganizations through which Terra became the parent of GSR III. Pursuant to the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, Terra OpCo caused to be formed Terra Innovatum Global s.r.l., an Italian limited liability company (Italian Società a responsabilità limitata) with the same quotaholders in the same ownership percentages as Terra OpCo (“Terra Global”); Terra Global converted into a public limited liability company organized under Dutch law, referred to herein as “Terra”; GSR III was merged with and into Terra MergerCo (a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Terra), with GSR III surviving the merger as a wholly owned Subsidiary of Terra (the “Merger” and, together with the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, the “Business Combination”).

On October 10, 2025, our Ordinary Shares commenced trading on Nasdaq, under the symbol “NKLR.”

Our Mission

Terra Innovatum’s mission is to make nuclear power accessible by delivering simple and safe micro-reactor solutions that are scalable, affordable and deployable anywhere, 1MWe at a time.

Overview

Terra Innovatum srl was incorporated under the laws of Italy on September 23, 2021 (“Inception”) and is headquartered in Lucca, Italy. Before Terra Innovatum’s incorporation, from 2018 to 2021 a team of engineers, who are now part of Terra Innovatum, contributed their time, effort and resources to advance the SOLO concept to design, demonstrating the feasibility and the innovative aspects.

Terra Innovatum is a nuclear reactor developer, focused on smaller, cheaper, and safer advanced clean energy solutions. Terra Innovatum’s flagship product, the SOLO Micro-Modular Nuclear Reactor (SOLO), is designed to operate continuously at full power for 15 years without refueling, with the potential for core/reactor swaps to extend the operational cycle up to 45 years. Its modular design aims to achieve maximum energy efficiency while significantly reducing the levelized cost of energy (“LCOE”). Terra Innovatum is committed to delivering carbon-free energy solutions and aims to achieve commercial deployment of SOLO by 2028 to address the growing global demand for sustainable and reliable energy.

Terra Innovatum believes the following characteristics make SOLO unique and position the Company well for successful regulatory approval and commercialization:

Terra Innovatum’s primary business model is centered on the direct sale of SOLO reactors to customers seeking reliable and sustainable energy solutions, such as industrial operations, manufacturing facilities, remote locations, healthcare facilities, and data centers, among many others. We intend to manufacture these units by contracting with existing nuclear component suppliers, with final assembly expected to be completed in established facilities in the U.S., Europe and Asia before transporting them to customer sites. Each SOLO reactor is designed to be easily transported via standard highways and installed using pre-fabricated components, with the goal of dramatically reducing deployment time and costs compared to conventional nuclear facilities. In addition to reactor sales, we intend to offer service packages and periodic maintenance services throughout each unit’s operational lifetime.

Innovation is central to our mission. Our breakthrough ability to reach criticality using LEU fuel should enable expedited regulatory approval. The SOLO reactor incorporates redundant shutdown mechanisms and is encased in a 2.5 meter thick concrete housing (known as the “monolith”) providing biological shielding; hence, no EPZ beyond the operational boundary is expected to be required. This design should allow the deployment of SOLO in highly populated areas and sensitive locations where conventional nuclear plants and other Small Modular Reactors (“SMRs”) cannot be deployed, notably due to their larger footprints and associated EPZ.

The SOLO reactor is designed to deliver a highly competitive and stable LCOE over a 45-year period, with potential for further reduction when waste heat is utilized for industrial or commercial applications, a process known as “cogeneration”. Our regulatory engagement plan was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in early 2025, and we are targeting licensing and commercial deployment of our First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) reactor by 2028.

Our target customer base spans a number of diverse sectors — including industrial operations, manufacturing facilities, remote locations, healthcare facilities, and data centers, among many others. SOLO is designed to allow customers to purchase nuclear power generating capacity that can be deployed virtually anywhere it’s needed, providing point-of-use power and heat without reliance on transmission infrastructure. Focusing on using commercially proven materials and existing supply chains in the nuclear field, we are positioned to deliver reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy solutions to customers worldwide through our reactor sales and associated services.

Expected Timeline and Costs for Deployment

The following summarizes our estimated key dates in our timeline for deployment:

Industry Overview

The nuclear energy industry is experiencing renewed interest as countries worldwide seek reliable, carbon-free energy solutions to address climate change concerns while meeting growing energy demands. SMRs and microreactors, like our SOLO technology, represent a new generation of nuclear solutions designed to overcome traditional barriers to nuclear deployment.

The successful execution of our business model depends, among other considerations, on favorable regulatory environments, public acceptance of nuclear power, and continued policy support for advanced nuclear technologies. Recently, in the United States and globally, governments have demonstrated increased support for next-generation nuclear technologies through initiatives such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s improved frameworks for reviewing innovative designs and the Department of Energy’s programs supporting advanced reactor development. However, the regulatory and political landscape could shift at any time due to factors beyond our control, including changes in administrations, public perception shifts following nuclear-related incidents, or evolving energy priorities.

Microreactor deployment faces unique challenges and opportunities compared to traditional nuclear plants and larger SMRs. While our SOLO reactor’s inherent safety features, small footprint, and envisioned absence of an EPZ requirement position us favorably for widespread adoption, we must navigate complex regulatory pathways that are still evolving for this new class of nuclear technology. Our ability to use commercially available LEU fuel provides a significant advantage over competitors requiring HALEU looking into the commercial readiness aspect.

Market adoption of microreactor technologies like SOLO will depend in part on our ability to demonstrate safety, reliability, and economic competitiveness against both traditional energy sources and other emerging technologies. The current market shift toward distributed energy resources and increasing demand for reliable, carbon-free power in applications ranging from data centers to remote industrial operations presents significant opportunities for our technology. However, public perception about nuclear energy, local community reaction to the installation of nuclear reactors, delays in regulatory approvals, or changes in energy economics could impact the pace of adoption and our overall business performance.

As we work toward commercializing our SOLO reactor, our performance will depend in part on factors affecting the broader nuclear industry and energy markets, which remain subject to technological, regulatory, and political influences that are difficult to predict over the long term.

Our markets

SOLO is intended to provide transformative micro-modular nuclear reactor solutions for industries requiring reliable, scalable, and carbon-free energy. The SOLO platform delivers electricity and/or heat (e.g. by means of high-temperature steam) to markets where conventional infrastructure is constrained, costly, or environmentally unsustainable. We believe that the SOLO solution can address six critical industry sectors through standardized, modular deployment, including: Industrial Applications, Logistics and Transportation, Data Centers, Energy Storage, Civil and Commercial Facilities and Underserved Communities.

We work with nuclear component suppliers, engineering firms, and construction partners to deliver complete SOLO reactor systems. By focusing on commercially available components and simplified design, we can address these diverse sectors with a standardized product that can be deployed virtually anywhere energy is needed and we can be flexible in the project development business model.

One key element of SOLO is its modularity. The SOLO provides energy production upon installation of the first module, allowing customers to scale as needed in a cost-effective manner without sacrificing its energy needs. As the reactor is expected to have a small EPZ, we can satisfy any demand ranging from MW to GW by replicating the reactor as many times is needed to cover the customer needs.

Industrial Applications

The SOLO reactor is designed to serve a wide range of industrial customers requiring both electricity and process heat. Our 1MWe power generation capability combined with 4MW of 55°C heat or 5MW of 450°C steam addresses critical energy needs across industries including cement production, food processing, paper mills, chemical plants, pharmaceutical facilities, and mining operations.

We believe that our reactors will provide industrial customers with stable energy costs, reduced carbon emissions, and enhanced reliability, particularly in remote locations or regions with expensive grid electricity.

SOLO is designed to support industrial processes that traditionally rely on fossil fuel boilers, offering significant decarbonization opportunities. This energy source is specifically relevant for sugar refiners, breweries and distilleries (other than food processing industries).

Logistics and Transportation

The logistics sector requires consistent power for frozen storage facilities, automated distribution centers, shipping ports, airports, and Electric Vehicle (“EV”) charging infrastructure, among a number of other applications. SOLO reactors provide the reliable electricity needed for these operations while offering waste heat utilization for facility climate control or specific process applications.

By eliminating dependency on diesel generators or unreliable grid connections, our technology can enable more sustainable and cost-effective logistics operations.

Data Centers

The rapidly growing data center market faces significant challenges including power availability constraints, land use and water restrictions, and grid capacity limitations. SOLO reactors address these challenges through their compact 10m² footprint, which dramatically reduces land requirements compared to conventional power generation facilities and helps avoid the increasing land use conflicts seen in specific densely populated areas in the United States and Europe where data center development has faced restrictions due to competing community needs.

Our behind-the-meter, off-grid capability can reduce reliance on strained electrical infrastructure, allowing data centers to bypass the typical long waiting period for grid power access experienced in the United States and Europe.

The SOLO reactor’s modular approach may enable data center operators to deploy power capacity incrementally at 1MWe per module, aligning energy supply with facility construction phases and commercial ramp-up rather than waiting for full commissioning of large-scale power plants and its design features allows for load-follows operation with a very limited battery energy storage capacity.

This scalability supports both colocation and hyperscale facilities with the ability to deploy multiple units to meet capacity requirements up to 1GW. Our approach offers superior reliability and redundancy compared to traditional grid connections while simultaneously eliminating carbon emissions.

The waste heat from SOLO reactors can be utilized for building heating or sold to district heating systems or through heat pumps generating air conditioning, further enhancing efficiency and creating additional revenue streams.

Energy Storage

Our SOLO micro nuclear reactor platform is ideally suited to enable advanced energy storage.

By providing reliable, carbon-free electricity, SOLO can support the production of pink hydrogen through electrolysis.

In ammonia and fertilizer plants, SOLO’s electricity and heat can replace fossil-fuel boilers, enabling large-scale decarbonization of ammonia synthesis — critical steps for both food security and emerging clean energy markets.

Biofuel refineries can also benefit from SOLO’s process heat and power, which can efficiently drive distillation, fermentation, and pumping, lowering the carbon intensity of ethanol and biodiesel production while displacing diesel or natural gas.

Civil and Commercial Facilities

Critical facilities such as hospitals, airports, water treatment facilities and hotels require uninterrupted power for continuous operation.

The SOLO reactor is designed to deliver 1MWe of baseload power with additional thermal energy that can be utilized for space heating, water heating, and other facility needs.

For hospitals specifically, our technology is designed to enable both reliable power and the production of radioisotopes for medical applications such as cancer treatment and diagnostics, bringing these capabilities to facilities that might otherwise lack access to such resources.

Underserved Communities

Remote locations, islands, and communities with limited grid access traditionally rely on expensive, polluting diesel generation. SOLO reactors offer transformative energy solutions for these markets, providing stable electricity at predictable costs for basic needs, agricultural irrigation and water desalination. By eliminating dependence on diesel fuel logistics, price fluctuations and negative environmental impacts, our technology can enable sustainable energy independence and economic development in underserved regions.

Our Technology

Electricity and Thermal Capacity

SOLO outputs 1MW electric produced by transforming 4MW of heat powered by the same type of LEU fuel that powers most nuclear facilities in the world today.

Overall Dimensions

The reactor is compact with overall dimensions of approximately 6.5m in height, a cross section of 2.4 m and weighing 60 metric tons in total (reactor core is less than 20 metric tons). SOLO can be assembled in many existing nuclear manufacturing facilities and can be transported on most U.S. and European highways.

Fuel

SOLO can use LEU, leveraging the vast operational experience accumulated by the various fuel vendors over the past decades.

SOLO is prepared to accommodate future technologies notably on fuel perspective, being compatible with HALEU products when licensed and commercially available.

SOLO provides a platform able to transition to new developments e.g. potentially benefitting of significant extension of its fuel cycle employing HALEU or adopting current and future accident tolerant fuel (ATF) solutions related to new clad material, which would allow an increase of the thermodynamic efficiency and possibly extending its industrial applications. 

SOLO can also benefit from current and future accident tolerant fuel (ATF) solutions related to new clad material, which would allow an increase of the average working temperature, consequently improving the thermodynamic efficiency and possibly extending its industrial applications.

Fuel Rods/Moderator

The fuel rods contain UO₂ Pellets at 4.95% U-235 enrichment level in Zircalloy clad (same as operating Light Water Reactors). The moderator is a made of a solid heterogeneous Beryllium and Graphite matrix.

Coolant

SOLO is a gas cooled reactor. The coolant, which is helium gas, enters the bottom of the reactor, is heated while passing through dedicated channels adjacent to the fuel rods and collected into the upper plenum. Keeping a physical separation between the coolant and the fuel rods is a very important design feature. After being heated, the helium moves from the upper plenum to a heat exchanger transferring the heat to the secondary circuit for the production of electricity.

Multiple Redundant Shutdown Mechanisms

The reactor is controlled when everything is operating normally using 12 control drums. The control drums are built with a N+3 redundancy: 9 out of 12 drums are sufficient to ensure the control function up to shut down the reactor. In addition to the control system, we built 3 different active and passive and diverse shutdown mechanisms; each of which has its own redundancy. These 3 shutdown systems can be relied upon in case of malfunction or incident:

Monolith: Biological Shield

SOLO is encased in all sides by the about 2.5m thick concrete block, the Monolith, which serves as a biological shield from radiation and the decay heat removal system. With the Monolith, decay heat is removed by natural convection. Since the radiation that reaches the outside of the Monolith is almost non-existent, we expect that an EPZ will be limited to the external boundary of the Monolith.

Competitive Strengths

Unique Technology and Safety Features

SOLO has been purposefully engineered as a compact 1MWe+4Mwt at 55°C/5MWt at 450°C reactor to prioritize safety. Its low thermal power output eliminates the risk of core meltdown. By using helium as a coolant instead of water, SOLO also avoids the danger of hydrogen explosions. Beside the elimination by physics of such catastrophic events the design benefits of the helium’s inert nature which allow the exclusion of corrosion issues on any reactor and coolant piping components. The reactor is equipped with multiple independent shutdown mechanisms and is enclosed within the Monolith, potentially allowing it to operate without the need for an EPZ to increase safety and regulatory compliance.

Supply Chain Certainty and Fast Time to Market

Every safety-related component of SOLO, including fuel, is sourced from the existing nuclear supply chain. Non safety-related components such as turbines, heat exchangers, condensers, etc. are commercially-off-the-shelf components from tradition non-nuclear suppliers. This approach promotes predictable regulatory pathways, reliable commercialization, and cost visibility. Multiple suppliers are available for each key component, reducing supply chain risk and supporting rapid deployment. The simulations associated with the design and components can be executed with existing codes licensed for nuclear applications.

SOLO’s simple design and use of off-the-shelf materials minimize R&D requirements and streamline the licensing process. The regulatory engagement plan with the NRC is already underway, targeting commercial deployment in 2028.

Economic Competitiveness

SOLO’s LCOE is expected to be highly competitive globally, especially in the U.S. and European markets.

The reactor’s co-generation capability (simultaneous production of electricity and usable heat) allows customers to offset heating costs, potentially reducing the effective electricity price further. We believe additional savings might be obtained where carbon credits are available for emission reductions.

Furthermore, SOLO’s modularity enables customers to scale installations precisely to their needs, with significant cost savings due to reduced transmission infrastructure and on-site assembly.

Operational Flexibility and Market Reach

SOLO can be a source of electricity, heat, co-generation, or radioisotopes, serving a diverse range of sectors: industrial, infrastructure, medical, data centers, and more.

The modular, factory-assembled design allows SOLO to be shipped globally and installed quickly, even in challenging environments. Its compact size and limited weight support transport on standard highways and fast on-site installation.

The SOLO reactor is compatible with both LEU and, when available, HALEU, ensuring future-proof fuel flexibility, potentially excluding the need of core/reactor replacement to cover the 45 year life span of the system.

Scalability and Redundancy

SOLO’s modularity means installations can be scaled from a single unit to hundreds or even thousands, providing energy redundancy and minimizing the impact of individual reactor outages. A 1,000-unit SOLO installation occupies less dedicated land (including EPZ) than a typical 1 GW reactor (when inclusive of a reactor’s required EPZ), at a fraction of the cost and with enhanced reliability.

Regulations

We are subject to extensive U.S. federal, state, and local laws and regulations, as well as foreign laws, covering a broad range of areas relevant to our operations. These regulatory requirements are continually evolving, both domestically and internationally, resulting in an expanding scope of compliance obligations. Key areas of regulation include nuclear energy and materials, environmental protection, export controls, national security, and other legal domains. Like other participants in the commercial nuclear industry, we operate under significant scrutiny from regulatory authorities in the U.S. and abroad, and many applicable laws and regulations are subject to ongoing interpretation and change by agencies and courts. Compliance with these requirements can be complex and costly, potentially affecting our business model, competitive position, and financial results.

The nuclear industry is highly regulated worldwide, and the design, construction, and operation of nuclear facilities require regulatory approval in each jurisdiction. Nuclear safety regulators typically assess design safety, resilience to internal and external hazards, and environmental impacts. Regulatory processes are country-specific, though international collaboration among regulators is common, especially when a design is deployed in multiple markets. Our licensing strategy aims to secure timely approvals by engaging early with regulators and maintaining a consistent design across markets, leveraging the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (“NRC”) approval of the design as a foundation.

Internationally, most countries restrict license applications to the proposed plant owner or operator. We intend to engage proactively with regulators in each target country, consistent with our approach in the U.S. The NRC’s established relationships with foreign regulators and participation in international organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (“IAEA”) are expected to support our efforts to obtain regulatory approvals abroad and provide additional confidence in our technology. We also anticipate benefiting from the NRC’s regulatory assistance programs, which facilitate collaboration and information sharing with other national regulators. Beyond nuclear safety, our activities are also subject to other regulatory controls, including export control laws, nuclear material safeguards, non-proliferation obligations, and liability insurance regimes such as the Price-Anderson Act and international conventions. Compliance with these additional requirements may further impact our operations, costs, and risk profile.

Patents and Proprietary Rights

We strategically protect our intellectual property through a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements, and licensing arrangements both domestically and internationally, with plans to strengthen this protection framework as our technology portfolio expands.

Our pending and filed patent applications specifically address our advanced reactor designs, passive safety systems, digital twin technology, and specialized nuclear instrumentation and control systems critical to our micro-modular reactor technologies. Patent Protection is expected to last until approximately 21 years from the earliest provisional filing date, which would be in 2046 taking into consideration the possibility of a short-term patent term extension and full payment of all fees.

Provisional patents expire one year from their filing date, however such patents remain patent pending as long as a Patent Cooperation Treaty or National phase application claiming a benefit to that provisional patent was filed on or before the one year deadline. The filing of the Regular, PCT or National phase application starts the 20 year available patent term. Together with the one year term of the Provisional Patent, the potential patent term will be approximately 21 years from the filing dates of the provisional applications. There are various factors that might extend or shorten patent terms, including without limitation, (i) excessive delays within the patent office that could result in extensions to the patent term, (ii) Terminal disclaimers that tie patent terms to other patents, and (iii) timely payment of maintenance fees to retain the patent(s) after issue.

The Company filed PCT filings for two provisional patents on April 20, 2026.

We also engage with international and local regulatory bodies and existing frameworks to safeguard our innovations across various jurisdictions. However, certain countries where our reactor components may be manufactured or where our reactor systems may be deployed may offer less robust protection for nuclear intellectual property compared to the United States or European Union regulatory environments.

Our intellectual property strategy employs a systematic assessment framework considering:

We plan to establish licensing agreements for certain specialized nuclear technologies from third-party developers and anticipate continued expansion of such arrangements as our reactor deployment roadmap advances.

Manufacturing and supply chain

We implement a fabless and contract manufacturing strategy, and expect to contract with key suppliers for all phases of the manufacturing process. We expect that this will eliminate the need for an in-house factory and will allow us to use existing manufacturing facilities. We leverage the expertise of industry-leading suppliers that comply with nuclear quality assurance standards  — including 10 CFR 50 Appendix B — in areas including fabrication, assembly, quality control, reliability testing, and licensing. We expect micro reactors like SOLO be regulated under the pending 10 CFR Part 57, a new regulation tailored to reactors like SOLO. This approach may allow Terra Innovatum to avoid the significant costs and risks associated with owning and operating manufacturing facilities while enabling scalability and rapid response to markets changing conditions.

While we plan to directly procure certain critical raw materials used in our products, such as moderators, fuel, and specialized components, our suppliers are expected to manage procurement for most other components. This enables us to focus our resources on product design, licensing, quality assurance, marketing, and customer engagement.

To anticipate high growth periods, we may place non-cancellable inventory orders for certain components ahead of historical lead times, pay premiums, or provide deposits to secure future supply and manufacturing capacity.

Our supply chain will be positioned for deployment, with manufacturing risks mitigated through qualification testing of key components in advance of both First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) and Nth-of-a-Kind (NOAK) installations. We will actively secure long-lead materials and have established long-term agreements with critical supply chain partners to ensure operational continuity.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2025, we had 5 employees, four executive directors providing services to us (of whom three entered into a written directorship agreement), as well as contractors engaged on a full time basis depending on the needs.

Available Information

Our main corporate website address is https://terrainnovatum.com/. Copies of our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Act, are available free of charge on our website within the “Investors” section as soon as reasonably practicable after having been electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. All SEC filings are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The information contained on these websites as referenced is not incorporated by reference into this filing. Further, the Company’s references to website URLs are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Investors and others should note that we announce material financial information to our investors using our investor relations website, SEC filings, press releases, public conference calls, and webcasts. We use these channels, including our website, to communicate with our investors and the public about our company, our products and solutions and other issues. It is possible that the information we post on our website could be deemed to be material information. Therefore, we encourage investors, the media and others interested in our company to review the information we make available on our website.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

RISK FACTORS

These disclosures reflect the Company’s beliefs and opinions as to factors that could materially and adversely affect the Company and its securities in the future. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not such factors have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future.

Risks Related to Terra Innovatum’s Business

We are a holding company with no direct operations that relies on dividends, distributions, loans and other payments, advances and transfers of funds from our operating Subsidiary, Terra Innovatum s.r.l., an Italian limited liability company (Italian Società a responsabilità limitata) (“Terra OpCo”), to pay dividends, pay expenses and meet our other obligations. Accordingly, our securityholders are subject to all of the risks of Terra OpCo’s business.

Throughout this section, unless otherwise noted, “Terra Innovatum,” “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Terra Innovatum Global N.V. and our consolidated subsidiaries, including Terra OpCo.

We have incurred losses and have not generated any revenue since our inception. We anticipate that we will continue to incur losses, and expect that we will not generate revenue, for the foreseeable future.

Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses, and have an accumulated deficit of approximately $607.3 million as of December 31, 2025 and negative operating cash flow in 2025 and 2024. We expect that operating losses and negative cash flows will increase in the coming years because of additional costs and expenses related to our research and development (which we refer to herein as “R&D”), business development activities and our status as a publicly traded company. To date, we have not generated any revenue. We do not expect to generate any revenue unless and until we are able to commercialize our reactors and/or other lines of business. As we have incurred losses and experienced negative operating cash flows since our inception, and accordingly we have undertaken equity financing from investors to satisfy our funding needs; however, we may not raise adequate funding to offset our expenses and losses. Moreover, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business. The magnitude of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future growth of our expenses and our ability to generate and grow revenue. We cannot predict the outcome of the actions to generate liquidity to fund our operations, whether such actions would generate the expected liquidity to fund our operations as currently planned or whether the costs of such actions will be available on reasonable terms or at all. Our continued solvency is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional working capital to complete our reactor development, to successfully market our reactors and to achieve commerciality for our reactors. Our prior losses and expected future losses have had and may continue to have adverse effects on our shareholders’ equity (deficit) and working capital and may lead to the failure of our business.

Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and challenges we may encounter.

We have a limited operating history in a rapidly evolving industry. The markets for nuclear reactor design, nuclear reactor production, nuclear fuel design, nuclear fuel supply, and services related to any or all of the foregoing business may not continue to develop in a manner that we expect or that otherwise would be favorable to our business. As a result of our limited operating history and ongoing changes in our new and evolving industry, including evolving demand for our products and services and the potential development of technologies that may prove more efficient or effective for our intended use cases, our ability to forecast our future results of operations and plan for future growth is limited and subject to uncertainties. We have encountered and expect to continue to encounter risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by companies in rapidly evolving industries, such as the risks and uncertainties described in this annual report. Accordingly, we may be unable to prepare accurate internal financial forecasts or replace anticipated revenue that we do not receive as a result of delays, changed circumstances, or changed market conditions arising from these factors, and our results of operations in future reporting periods may be below the expectations of investors or analysts. If we do not address these risks successfully, our results of operations could differ materially from our estimates or the expectations of investors or analysts, causing our business to suffer and our ordinary share price to decline.

We have not yet commercialized or sold the SOLO or any other micro-modular reactor (“MMR”), and there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so.

After we develop and obtain regulatory approval, the planned initial deployment of the SOLO is subject to Terra Innovatum reaching binding agreements for its scope of supply with potential customers. If no customer enters into such binding agreements with us, our initial deployment of the SOLO and ongoing services associated with such deployment could be significantly delayed. This could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. To date, the various memoranda of understanding that we have entered into with potential purchasers are non-binding and largely contingent upon successful site characterization studies — including for the First-Of-A-Kind site, governing body approvals and regulatory approvals, and may not result in binding agreements for the purchase of our products or services. The potential purchasers may also elect to terminate or pursue other alternative transactions.

If we fail to manage our growth effectively, we may be unable to execute our business plan, and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be harmed.

In order to achieve future revenue growth, we must finalize our reactor design, receive regulatory approvals, and continue to develop and market new products and services to traditional and non-traditional end-users. We intend to expand our operations as we develop and deploy our products and services in the future, and will need to hire and retain additional personnel, upgrade our existing operational management and financial and reporting systems, and improve our business processes and controls. Our future expansion will include:

If our operations continue to grow as planned, of which there can be no assurance, we will need to expand our sales and marketing, research and development, customer and commercial strategy, products and services, supply, and manufacturing functions. These efforts will require us to invest significant financial and other resources, including in industries and sales channels in which we have limited experience to date. We will also need to develop and implement our manufacturing and operational systems and processes, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to scale the business as currently planned or within the planned timeframe. The continued expansion of our business will require manufacturing and operational facilities, as well as space for administrative support, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to find suitable locations for such facilities.

Our growth will increase the strain on our resources, and we could experience operating difficulties, including difficulties in hiring and training employees, finding manufacturing capacity to produce our MMRs and related equipment, delays in production, challenges in scaling-up fuel and component fabrication capacity and difficulty sourcing adequate raw material, such as graphite, for our reactors. These difficulties may divert the attention of management and key employees and impact financial and operational results. If we are unable to drive commensurate growth, these costs, which include headcount and capital assets, could result in decreased margins, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent upon key officers.

Our success depends to a significant extent on the continued service of our key management, technical and other personnel. We are very thinly staffed and, as a result, the loss of one or more of our executive officers could adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects. We do not maintain “key person” life insurance on any of our executives. If we are unable to retain our current officers or attract and retain additional qualified employees as needed, our ability to execute our business strategy and achieve our objectives could be materially and adversely affected.

There is limited operating experience or regulatory precedent for reactors of this type, configuration and scale, which may result in greater than expected construction and material costs, maintenance requirements, operating expense or delivery timing. 

Our MMR design will be actively managed through design reviews, prototyping, involvement of external partners and application of industry lessons. However, we could still fail to identify manufacturing, material and construction issues early enough to avoid negative effects on production, fabrication, construction or ultimate performance of our MMRs and related technologies, or we may encounter unexpected regulatory issues. Where these issues arise at such later stages of deployment, deployment could be subject to greater costs or be significantly delayed, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

We intend to operate deployed SOLO reactors in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. For certain deployments, we may seek to engage one or more qualified operators with recognized experience in civil nuclear generation for the operation and maintenance of SOLO reactors. We may not be able to engage such operators on commercially agreeable terms, which could adversely affect our ability to deploy and commercialize SOLO reactors.

The market for MMRs generating electric power and high-temperature heat is not yet established and may not achieve the growth potential we expect or may grow more slowly than expected.

The market for MMRs, and particularly for MMRs utilizing advanced nuclear technologies such as those employed in the SOLO, has not yet been established. MMRs utilizing advanced nuclear technologies have limited operational history and have not been proven at scale. Estimates for the total addressable market and our expectations, inclusive of recent updates, with regards to certain unit economics are based on a number of internal and third-party estimates, including our potential contracted revenue, the number of potential customers who have expressed interest in our MMRs, assumed prices and production and regulatory costs for our MMRs, our ability to develop logistical and operational processes, assumptions regarding our technology and general market conditions. However, our assumptions and the data underlying our estimates may not be correct and the conditions supporting our assumptions or estimates may change at any time, reducing the predictive accuracy of these underlying factors. As a result, our expected performance as indicated by the illustrative unit economics provided in this annual report, our estimates of the annual total addressable market and serviceable addressable market for our services, as well as the expected growth rate for the total addressable market and serviceable addressable market for our services, may prove to be incorrect.

We may not attract customers to our MMR technology as quickly as we expect, or at all, and acquiring customers may be more expensive than we currently anticipate.

MMRs and advanced nuclear technologies are relatively new and unproven and may be more costly than alternatives. Accordingly, adoption of our technology, or MMRs and advanced nuclear technologies generally, among our potential customers may progress more slowly than we anticipate or it may be more expensive to bring potential customers into our pipeline. Any delay or failure to attract potential customers to our reactors or MMR technology may have a material and adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

Our cost estimates are highly sensitive to broader economic factors, and our ability to control or manage our costs may be limited.

Capital and operating costs for the deployment of a first-of-a-kind reactor such as the SOLO are difficult to project, inherently variable and are subject to significant change based on a variety of factors, including site-specific factors, customer off-take requirements, regulatory oversight, operating agreements, supply chain availability, inflation and other factors. Opportunities for cost reductions with subsequent deployments are similarly uncertain. To the extent cost reductions are not achieved within the expected timeframe or magnitude, the SOLO may not be cost competitive with alternative technologies, which could materially and adversely affect our expected revenues, gross margins and on the other information included in the Unit Economics Information.

Competition from existing or new companies could cause us to experience downward pressure on prices, fewer customer orders, reduced margins, the inability to take advantage of new business opportunities, and the loss of market share.

We operate in highly competitive markets and are subject to competition based upon product design, performance, pricing, quality, and services, from competing nuclear suppliers as well as from alternative means of producing electricity and/or heat. There are a number of advanced reactor designs, and some advanced reactor projects, under development in the United States. Many of these designs are involved in pre-application review with the NRC. Our advanced design, projected product design performance, engineering expertise, and quality control have been important factors in our growth; nonetheless other companies providing competing technologies could capture customers or market share from us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

For sales and/or deployments outside of jurisdictions with highly-developed nuclear regulatory frameworks, some of our foreign competitors currently benefit from, and others may benefit in the future from, permissive regulatory and licensing regimes and/or from protective measures by their home countries where governments are providing financial support, including significant investments in the development of new technologies.

We believe our ability to compete successfully in designing, engineering and manufacturing our products and services at attractive costs to customers does and will depend on a number of factors, which may change in the future due to increased competition, our ability to meet our customers’ needs and the frequency and availability of our offerings. If we are unable to compete successfully, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Technological changes could render our technology and products uncompetitive or obsolete, which could prevent us from achieving market share and sales.

Our failure to refine or advance our MMR technologies could cause our reactor technology to become uncompetitive or obsolete, which could prevent us from achieving market share and sales. We may need to invest significant financial resources in research and product development to keep pace with technological advances in the industry and to compete in the future; we may be unable to secure such financing. A variety of competing alternative technologies may be in development by other companies that could result in lower manufacturing or operating costs and/or higher performance than those expected for our technology. Our development efforts may be rendered obsolete by the technological advances of others, and other technologies may prove more advantageous for commercialization.

Changes in the availability and cost of electricity, natural gas and other forms of energy are subject to volatile market conditions that could adversely affect our business.

The prices for and availability of electricity, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions. We do not control these market conditions, which are, moreover, often affected by political and economic factors beyond our control. Decreases in energy prices, or changes in nuclear energy costs relative to other forms of energy, may adversely affect our business. To the extent that these uncertainties cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive or to adjust their business plans and operations, decreased energy prices may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The cost of electricity generated from nuclear sources may not be cost competitive with other electricity generation sources in some markets, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

Many U.S. electricity markets price electric energy, capacity, and/or ancillary services on a competitive basis, with market prices subject to substantial fluctuations. Other markets remain heavily regulated by state or local utility regulatory authorities, with power purchase decisions by electric utilities subject to various competitiveness or prudence tests. As a result of competitive pressures, some electricity markets experience low marginal energy prices at certain times due to a combination of subsidized generating resources, competitors with low-cost or no-cost fuel sources, or market-design features that create incentives for certain attributes or deliver revenue in unpredictable ways over time, and Terra Innovatum may not be able to compete in these markets unless the benefits of the low-carbon, reliable and/or resilient energy generation provided by the SOLO is sufficiently valued. Even in markets that price reliable capacity on a long-term basis, there is no guarantee that our customers’ SOLO units will be sufficiently low-cost so as to clear auction-style capacity markets, and clearing in any one year is no guarantee of clearing in successive years. Moreover, our SOLO reactor will likely serve a specific market segment of smaller distributed generation, remote application or industrial customers, who may have lower-cost power/heat alternatives available to them, especially in the near-term.

Given the relatively lower electricity prices and higher availability of power in the United States when compared to many international markets, the risk may be greater with respect to business in the United States. Regardless of jurisdiction, however, failure of our MMRs to provide competitively priced electricity or heat could materially and adversely affect our business.

We and our customers operate in a politically sensitive environment, and the public perception of nuclear energy can affect our customers and us.

Successful execution of our business model is dependent upon public support for nuclear power in the United States and other countries. The risks associated with uses of radioactive materials by our customers in future deployments of our MMR designs, and the public perception of those risks, can affect our business. Opposition by third parties can delay or prevent the licensing and construction of new nuclear power facilities and in some cases can limit the operation of nuclear reactors. Adverse public reaction to developments in the use of nuclear power could directly affect our customers and indirectly affect our business. In the past, adverse public reaction, increased regulatory scrutiny and related litigation have contributed to extended licensing and construction periods for new nuclear reactors, sometimes delaying construction schedules by decades or more, or even shutting down operations at already-constructed reactors.

Accidents involving nuclear power facilities, including but not limited to events similar to any of the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl or Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accidents, or terrorist acts or other high profile events involving radioactive materials, could materially and adversely affect the public perception of the safety of nuclear energy, our customers and the markets in which we operate and potentially decrease demand for nuclear energy or facilities, increase regulatory requirements and costs or result in liabilities or claims that could materially and adversely affect our business.

Historical nuclear accidents and fears of a new nuclear accident can hinder widespread acceptance of nuclear power. Nuclear power faces strong opposition from certain individuals and organizations both in the United States and abroad. With respect to public perceptions, the accident that occurred at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan in 2011 increased public opposition to nuclear power in some countries, resulting in a slowdown in, or, in some cases, a complete halt to new construction of nuclear power plants, an early shut down of existing power plants and a dampening of the favorable regulatory climate needed to introduce new nuclear technologies. As a result of the Fukushima accident, some countries that were considering launching new domestic nuclear power programs delayed or cancelled the preparatory activities they were planning to undertake as part of such programs. If a high-visibility or high-consequence nuclear accident, including the loss or mishandling of nuclear materials, or other event, such as a terrorist attack involving a nuclear facility, occurs, public opposition to nuclear power may increase dramatically, regulatory requirements and costs could become more onerous or prohibitory, and customer demand for the SOLO could suffer, which could materially and adversely affect our business and operations.

The direct and indirect impact on us and our customers from severe weather and other effects of climate change and the economic impacts of the transition to non-carbon based energy, could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows.

Our operations and properties, and those of our customers, may in the future be adversely impacted by flooding, wildfires, high winds, drought and other effects of severe weather conditions that may be caused or exacerbated by climate change. These events can force our customers to suspend operations at impacted properties and may result in significant damage to such properties. Even if these events do not directly impact us or our customers they may indirectly impact us and our customers through increased insurance, energy or other costs. In addition, although the ongoing transition to non-carbon based energy is creating significant opportunities for us and our customers, the transition also presents certain risks, including macroeconomic risks related to higher energy costs and energy shortages, among other things. These direct and indirect impacts from climate change could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results, supply chain and cash flows.

Our operations involve the use, transportation and disposal of toxic, hazardous and/or radioactive materials and could result in liability without regard to fault or negligence.

Our operations involve the use, transportation, and disposal of toxic, hazardous and radioactive materials. A release of these materials could pose a health risk to humans, plants and animals or the environment. If an accident were to occur, its severity would depend on the volume and location of the release and the speed of corrective action taken by emergency response personnel, as well as other factors beyond our control, such as weather and wind conditions.

We currently do not own any property, if, in the future we do, under federal, state and local laws and regulations, a current or former owner or operator of real property may be liable for costs to remediate contamination resulting from the presence or release of hazardous substances, wastes or petroleum products. These costs could be substantial and liability under such laws is strict and may attach whether or not the owner or operator knew of or caused such contamination. Moreover, the presence of contamination may expose us to third-party claims for property damage or bodily injury, subject our properties to liens in favor of the government for damages and cleanup costs, impose restrictions on the manner in which we use our properties, and materially adversely affect our ability to sell, lease, insure, or develop our properties. We also may be liable for costs of remediating third-party disposal sites to which we arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances without regard to whether such disposal occurred in compliance with environmental laws. These matters could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Additionally, we may be responsible for decontamination or decommissioning of facilities where we conduct, or previously conducted, operations. Activities of our contractors, suppliers or other counterparties similarly may involve toxic, hazardous, and radioactive materials and we may be liable contractually, or under applicable law, to contribute to remedy damages or other costs arising from such activities, including the decontamination or decommissioning of third-party facilities.

In the United States, the nuclear liability law codified at 42 U.S.C. 2210 (along with subsequent amendments, the “Price-Anderson Act”) and applicable NRC regulations and corresponding insurance requirements channel liability to the nuclear operator of a nuclear power plant for third-party offsite damages caused by a nuclear incident or a precautionary evacuation due to a possible or actual nuclear incident. U.S. law is substantially similar in effect to global nuclear liability regimes wherein operators are subject to robust financial protection regimes, such as required insurance policies or government indemnification, to cover the operator’s financial risk in the event of a nuclear incident that gives rise to third-party offsite liability. If, however, an incident or precautionary evacuation is not covered under such a nuclear liability regime, we could be financially liable for damages arising from such incident or evacuation, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The Price-Anderson Act does not, however, cover on-site loss or damage to property due to a nuclear incident. Rather, the NRC, like many nuclear regulators around the world, requires nuclear operators to maintain on-site property damage insurance. If an incident resulting in onsite property damage is not otherwise covered by the mandatory insurance policy maintained at the facility, then we could be potentially liable for damages arising from such incident, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In our contracts, we seek to protect ourselves from liability, but there is no assurance that such contractual limitations on liability will be effective in all cases or in all jurisdictions. The costs of defending against a claim arising out of a nuclear incident or precautionary evacuation not otherwise covered by insurance, and any damages awarded as a result of such claim, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Unresolved spent nuclear fuel storage and disposal issues and associated costs could have a significant negative impact on Terra Innovatum’s business operations if potential SOLO customers view the risks associated with these issues and costs as unacceptably high.

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 requires the DOE to provide for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel (“SNF”) and associated high-level nuclear waste (“HLW”). In 1987, Congress amended the Nuclear Waste Policy Act to identify Yucca Mountain, in Nevada, as the only site that the DOE could consider for a permanent repository. The DOE has since cancelled this project, but under the federal law, is required to construct storage facilities for, and to dispose of, all SNF and other HLW generated by domestic nuclear reactors. Interim storage requires the construction and maintenance of NRC licensed SNF/ HLW storage facilities. While the costs of developing and maintaining these interim storage facilities can have a significant effect on the costs associated with waste storage and disposal for nuclear reactors, including Terra Innovatum’s reactors, these costs could themselves be impacted by the timing of the opening of a disposal facility, as well as any possible future changes to the interim storage or transportation requirements for SNF and other forms of HLW, and the extent to which operators are able to continue to successfully sue DOE for costs incurred as a result of its continued failure to provide for permanent disposal.

There are currently two consolidated interim storage (“CIS”) facilities under development in the United States for the interim storage of SNF/HLW. One facility has received an NRC license for construction and operation, and the other facility is in the final stages of its NRC licensing review. It is possible that SNF/HLW generated at a Terra Innovatum reactor could be stored at one of these CIS facilities; however, it is also possible that these CIS facilities are never built or become operational, or are unable to store such waste from a Terra Innovatum reactor, in which case, the waste would need to be stored onsite or at another interim SNF storage facility until another disposal option became available, such as a U.S. government determined permanent national repository or other government storage facility.

The establishment of a national repository for the storage and/or permanent disposal of SNF, such as the one previously considered at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, the timing of such a facility’s opening and the ability of such a facility to accept waste from a Terra Innovatum reactor, and any related regulatory action, could impact the costs associated with our SOLO customers’ storage and/or disposal of SNF/HLW. Likewise, the establishment of a CIS for the storage of SNF/HLW, the timing of such a facility’s opening and being able to accept waste from a Terra Innovatum reactor, and any related regulatory action, could impact our customers’ costs associated with storage of SNF/HLW. These waste storage issues, and changes to the current waste disposal practices or changes to reactor operators’ ability to recover storage costs from DOE through litigation, could be material to Terra Innovatum’s operations if potential customers view waste disposal as problematic, detrimental or a negative factor when considering an investment in a Terra Innovatum reactor.

Unsatisfactory safety performance or security incidents at our facilities — or any nuclear facility around the world — could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We design and will manufacture highly sophisticated MMRs that depend on complex technology. We also work cooperatively with our suppliers, subcontractors, venture partners and other parties. Failures, disruptions or compromises to our or our third parties’ systems or facilities may be caused by natural disasters, accidents, power disruptions, telecommunications failures, acts of terrorism or war, computer viruses, bugs or vulnerabilities, physical or electronic break-ins, human error, targeted cyberattacks, other intentional conduct, or similar events or incidents. While we have built operational processes to ensure that the design, manufacture, performance and servicing of our MMRs meet rigorous safety standards and performance goals, there can be no assurance that we will not experience operational or process failures or other problems, including through manufacturing or design defects, failure of third-party safeguards, mishandling or process failures, natural disasters, cyber attacks, or other intentional acts, that could result in potential safety risks. There can be no assurance that our preparations, or those of third parties, will be able to prevent any such incidents.

Any actual or perceived safety issues may result in significant reputational harm to our businesses, in addition to tort liability, maintenance, increased safety infrastructure and other costs that may arise. Such issues with our MMRs, facilities, or customer safety could result in delaying or cancelling delivery of MMRs to our customers, increased regulation or other systemic consequences. Our inability to meet our safety standards or address adverse publicity affecting our reputation as a result of accidents, mechanical failures, damage to customer property or medical complications could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the nuclear industry, an accident or incident involving the mishandling of nuclear materials at any nuclear facility in the world can have an impact on other nuclear facilities around the world in terms of public acceptance, political pressures, and regulatory requirements and scrutiny. For example, the March 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan resulted in millions of dollars in additional regulatory reviews and requirements for U.S. nuclear power plants. If a safety incident occurs at any nuclear facility in the world, it could delay licensing and/or drive up costs to license or own our MMRs and negatively impact our business or financial condition.

We are subject to cybersecurity threats which could have adverse effects, including regulatory effects, on our business and results of operations.

We are increasingly dependent upon information technology systems, infrastructure and data to operate our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store, process and transmit confidential information (including but not limited to intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal data). It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. We also have outsourced elements of our operations to third parties, and as a result we manage a number of third-party contractors who have access to our confidential information.

Despite the implementation of security measures, given their size and complexity and the increasing amounts of confidential information that they maintain, our internal information technology systems, operational technology systems, and industrial control systems, and those of our contractors and consultants are potentially vulnerable to breakdown or other damage or interruption from service interruptions, system malfunction, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, as well as security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, contractors, consultants, business partners, and/or other third parties, or from cyber-attacks by malicious third parties (including the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information), which may compromise our system infrastructure or lead to data leakage. As part of our regular review of potential risks, we analyze emerging cyber security threats to us and our contractors, consultants, business partners and other third parties as well as our plans and strategies to address them. We are also subject to the SEC’s cybersecurity disclosure rules, which require us to describe our cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance, and to disclose material cybersecurity incidents. These obligations require us to maintain processes to assess the materiality of cybersecurity incidents on a timely basis, and any failure to timely or accurately make required disclosures could result in SEC enforcement action, investor litigation, or reputational harm. Our board of directors (“Board of Directors”), which has oversight responsibility for cyber security risks, including through the audit committee, which annually reviews our cybersecurity risk profile. See “Item 1C. Cybersecurity” for further information regarding our cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance. Any failure to maintain effective cybersecurity governance processes could increase our vulnerability to cybersecurity threats and adversely affect our ability to satisfy our regulatory disclosure obligations. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and reputational damage, and the further development and commercialization of our products could be delayed.

Additionally, we rely on third-party service providers for certain information technology functions, including cloud computing services. Any cybersecurity incident affecting our third-party service providers could adversely affect our operations or result in unauthorized access to our confidential information, even if our own systems are not directly compromised.

While we have not experienced any such system failure, accident or security breach to date, we cannot assure you that our data protection efforts and our investment in information technology will prevent significant breakdowns, data leakages, breaches in our systems or other cyber incidents that could have a material adverse effect upon our reputation, business, operations or financial condition. For example, we maintain databases comprised of our SOLO nuclear design technical engineering information and operations information, which have been and will continue to be used to design the SOLO reactors and will be utilized in “digital twin” construction and operations environments to allow for highly efficient construction and operations of these designs. If this database were to be lost or compromised, our ability to efficiently deploy and operate our reactors could be significantly impaired.

Furthermore, significant disruptions of our internal information technology systems or security breaches could result in the loss, misappropriation, and/or unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, confidential information (including, but not limited to, intellectual property, proprietary business information, and personal information), which could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us. For example, any such event that leads to unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of personal information, including personal information related to our employees, could harm our reputation directly, compel us to comply with federal and/or state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents, subject us to mandatory corrective action, and otherwise subject us to liability under laws and regulations that protect the privacy and security of personal information, which could result in significant legal and financial exposure and reputational damages that could potentially have an adverse effect on our business.

In addition, we and our customers are or will be subject to specific cybersecurity requirements imposed by the NRC, which requires licensees to protect digital computer and communication systems and networks associated with safety, security, and emergency preparedness functions from cyber attacks. Compliance with these requirements may be costly and technically complex, and any failure to comply could result in regulatory enforcement action, delays in obtaining or maintaining NRC licenses, or restrictions on our operations.

Our supply base may not be able to scale to the production levels necessary to meet sales projections.

We do not have manufacturing assets and will rely on third-party manufacturers and construction firms to build SOLO, fuel fabrication facilities and associated equipment. While we are working to secure and manage sufficient third-party manufacturing capabilities and facilities, these capabilities and the facilities involve risks including timeline, cost, and financing risk and even if successfully developed, might not be available for our earliest SOLO deployments. Moreover, we are dependent on future supplier capability to meet production demands attendant to our forecasts. If our supply chain cannot meet the schedule demands of the market, our projected sales revenues could be materially impacted.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers for certain materials and supplied components, some of which are highly specialized and are being designed for first-of-a-kind or sole use in the SOLO. We and our third-party vendors may not be able to obtain sufficient materials or supplied components to meet our manufacturing and operating needs, or obtain such materials on favorable terms or at expected costs.

We do not directly manufacture any components of our MMRs. Our ability to manufacture our MMRs depends on the sufficient availability of raw materials and supplied components, including many highly technical components that are still under design, are being developed for first-of-a-kind or sole use in the SOLO and have not yet been qualified for use, or are produced only by a limited number of suppliers and may be particularly susceptible to cost increases, supply chain disruptions, or inflationary pressures.

Certain materials, such as the graphite used for the moderator, are currently produced in limited quantities and are available predominantly from a small number of vendors inside and outside the United States (e.g., Italy, Germany, and Japan).

We rely on a limited number of suppliers for such materials and components, which means we may not be able to obtain sufficient raw materials or supplied components to meet our manufacturing and operating needs, or obtain such materials on favorable terms or at expected costs. Our reliance on multi-layered international supply chains to secure raw materials and supplied components exposes us to volatility in the prices and availability of these materials and may make us susceptible to changes in geopolitical relationships that could impair our ability to fulfill orders in a timely manner or increase our production costs.

Beyond tariffs and inflation, our international supply chain is also exposed to the risk that foreign governments may impose trade restrictions—including export bans, import licensing requirements, foreign direct investment screening, or local content mandates—that could affect the availability or cost of critical components. The imposition of tariffs and the impacts of inflation on raw materials or supplied components for our reactors could have a material adverse effect on our operations, and foreign government trade restrictions could further compound these effects.

Prolonged disruptions in the supply of any key raw materials or components, difficulties in qualifying new sources of supply or implementing the use of replacement materials, or any volatility in prices could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate in a cost-efficient and timely manner. Such prolonged disruptions could also result in cancellations or delays of scheduled launches, customer cancellations, or reductions in prices and margins, any of which could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We depend on key executives and management to execute our business plan and conduct our operations. A departure of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our success depends, in significant part, on the continued services of our senior management team and on our ability to attract, motivate, develop and retain a sufficient number of other highly skilled personnel, including engineers, manufacturing and quality assurance, finance, marketing and sales personnel. Our senior management team has extensive experience in the energy and manufacturing industries, and we believe that their depth of experience is instrumental to our continued success. The loss of any one or more members of our senior management team, for any reason, including resignation or retirement, could impair our ability to execute our business strategy and have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition if we are unable to successfully attract and retain qualified and highly skilled replacement personnel.

Our business plan requires us to attract and retain qualified personnel including personnel with highly technical expertise. Were we not to be able to successfully recruit and retain experienced and qualified personnel, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our future success depends in part on our ability to contract with, hire, integrate, and retain highly competent nuclear reactor and fuels focused engineers and scientists, and other qualified personnel. Competition for the limited number of these skilled professionals is intense. If we are unable to adequately anticipate our needs for certain key competencies and implement human resource solutions to recruit or improve these competencies, our business, results of operations and financial condition would suffer. If we are unable to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, especially personnel with sufficient technical expertise to develop our reactors and fuel, we may experience delays, increased costs and reputational harm. As a result, the licensing and approval process and the project development and ongoing nuclear regulatory oversight for our nuclear power plants may be delayed or be more costly.

We rely heavily on our intellectual property portfolio. Our ability to protect our patents and other intellectual property rights may be challenged and is not guaranteed. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our business and competitive position may be harmed.

We may not be able to prevent unauthorized use of our intellectual property, which could harm our business and competitive position. We rely upon a combination of the intellectual property protections afforded by patents, trademarks/service marks, copyrights and trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions, as well as commercial agreements such as confidentiality agreements, and license agreements to establish, maintain and enforce rights associated with our MMRs and related proprietary technologies. These measures are aimed at preventing third parties from using, practicing, selling, manufacturing, or otherwise commercially exploiting our MMRs and related technologies, which would erode our competitive position in our market. Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and enforce patent protection for our MMRs, as well as our ability to operate without infringing or violating the proprietary rights of others. We either own or have significant license rights to certain intellectual property applicable to our MMRs, including patent rights and pending patent applications on the same, and we will continue to file patent applications claiming new technologies directed to our MMRs in the United States and in other jurisdictions based on several factors including, but not limited to, commercial viability. Monitoring unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights is difficult and costly, and the steps we have taken or will take to prevent misappropriation may not be sufficient.

As noted above, we also rely upon unpatented trade secret protection, unpatented know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and help maintain our business and competitive position. We seek to protect our proprietary technology, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with our suppliers, subcontractors, venture partners, employees and consultants, and other third parties. However, we may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of information which we consider to be confidential, our technical know-how or other trade secrets by the parties to these agreements, despite the existence generally of confidentiality provisions and other contractual restrictions. If any of the suppliers, subcontractors, venture partners, employees and consultants, and other third parties who are parties to these agreements breaches or violates the terms of any of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation, and we could lose our trade secrets as a result. It is also possible that our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information could be obtained by third parties as a result of breaches of our physical or electronic security systems. Even where remedies are available, enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. Courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. Additionally, despite our efforts to protect our proprietary technology, our trade secrets could otherwise become known or be independently discovered by our competitors. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate, from using that technology or information to compete with us.

The patent position of our nuclear power reactors is not a guarantee of protection or rights. During the patent prosecution process, a patent office may require us or our licensors to narrow the scope of the claims of our or our licensors’ pending and future patent applications. This may limit the scope of patent protection and our or our licensors’ ability to assert patent infringement if the patent is subsequently issued. In some cases, a patent may not be issued if we or our licensors are unable to overcome rejections from a patent office. By pursuing patent rights by filing a patent, we or our licensors may lose trade secrets that would have otherwise been protected had a patent not been sought and third parties may be able to exploit such published information in our patent application. Additionally, even if we obtain a patent in one jurisdiction (e.g., the United States), we cannot guarantee that we will obtain a corresponding patent in another jurisdiction (e.g., Italy) as patent laws differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Additionally, maintaining and enforcing patent rights can involve complex legal and factual questions and may be subject to litigation in some cases. For example, third parties may challenge the validity of our or our licensors’ patents based on prior art at a tribunal such as the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in a federal court. Because we cannot assure that all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found, third parties may prevail in invalidating a patent or preventing a patent application from being issued as a patent. If we or our licensors are able to maintain valid patents or prevail in patent challenges instituted by third parties, we or our licensors may still bear the risk of third parties “designing around” our technologies to avoid an intellectual property infringement claim.

Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products similar to ours. The status of patents involves complex legal and factual questions and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. As a result, we cannot be certain that the patent applications that we file will result in patents being issued, or that our patents and any patents that may be issued to us will afford protection against competitors with similar technology. Numerous patents, published pending patent applications and unpublished pending patent applications owned by others exist in the fields in which we have developed and are developing our technology. In addition to the risk of infringing those patents, those patents may also be used as a basis to invalidate our patents or prevent our patent applications from issuing as patents. Our patents may also be challenged as invalid under other prior art and/or be challenged as unenforceable. Furthermore, patent applications filed in foreign countries are subject to laws, rules and procedures that differ from those of the United States, and thus we cannot be certain that foreign patent applications related to issued U.S. patents will be issued.

Even if our patent applications succeed and we are issued patents in accordance with those applications, it is still uncertain whether these patents will be contested, circumvented, invalidated or limited in scope in the future. The rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with meaningful protection or competitive advantages, and some foreign countries provide significantly less effective patent enforcement than in the United States. In addition, the claims of any patents that issue from our patent applications may not be broad enough to prevent others from developing technologies that are similar or that achieve results similar to ours. The intellectual property rights of others could also bar us from licensing and exploiting any patents that are issued from our pending patent applications. In addition, patents issued to us may be infringed or designed around by others and others may obtain patents that we need to license or design around, either of which would increase costs and may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

We currently enjoy only limited geographical protection with respect to certain issued patents and may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

We do not have worldwide patent rights for our MMRs and related proprietary technologies because there is no such thing as worldwide or “international patent rights.” Accordingly, we may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights in certain jurisdictions and their legal systems. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our MMRs worldwide can pose several challenges. First, procuring patent rights in multiple jurisdictions would be cost prohibitive because individual patent offices in different jurisdictions will have to examine each patent application separately. Therefore, costs such as examination fees, translation fees and attorneys’ fees are considered. Once a patent is registered, we or our licensors will also have the continued obligation of paying maintenance fees periodically to avoid patents from becoming abandoned or lapsed. Second, the breadth of claims in patents may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For instance, certain patent offices may require narrower claims, resulting in patent rights that are less extensive. Further, as noted above, we may not be able to obtain patents in some jurisdictions even if we obtain patents in other jurisdictions. Accordingly, our competitors may operate in countries where we do not have patent protection and can freely use our technologies and discoveries in such countries to the extent such technologies and discoveries are publicly known or disclosed in countries where we do have patent protection or pending patent applications.

Many countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. Many countries also limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we or any of our licensors are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We may need to defend ourselves against intellectual property infringement claims, which may be time-consuming and could cause us to incur substantial fees and costs.

Companies, organizations or individuals, including our existing and future competitors, may hold or obtain patents, trademarks/service marks or other intellectual property rights that would prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to develop our intellectual property and make, use, develop, import, offer to sell or sell our MMRs and related technology, which could make it more difficult for us to operate our company. From time to time, we may receive inquiries from holders of patents or trademarks/service marks inquiring whether we are infringing their proprietary rights and/or seeking court declarations that they do not infringe our intellectual property rights. Companies holding patents or other intellectual property rights similar to our technology may bring proceedings alleging infringement of such rights or otherwise asserting their rights and seeking licenses. In addition, if we are determined to have infringed a third party’s intellectual property rights, we may be required to do among other things, one or more of the following: (i) cease selling, incorporating or using MMRs that incorporate the challenged intellectual property; (ii) pay substantial damages; (iii) pay for and obtain a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property right, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all; or (iv) redesign part or all of our technology. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us and our failure or inability to obtain a license to the infringed technology, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, any litigation or claims, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management’s focus and attention.

We also license patents and other intellectual property from third parties, and we may face claims that the use of this intellectual property infringes the rights of other third parties. In such cases, we may seek indemnification from the licensors under our license contracts with those licensors or other damages. However, our rights to indemnification or damages may be unavailable or insufficient to cover our costs and losses, depending on our use of the technology, whether we choose to retain control over conduct of the litigation, and other factors.

We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, which might adversely affect our ability to develop and market our MMRs.

We cannot guarantee that any of our patent searches or analyses, including the identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or thorough because there may be hundreds of thousands of relevant patents worldwide. We also cannot be certain that we have identified each and every third-party patent and pending application in the United States and abroad that is relevant to or necessary for the commercialization of our MMRs in any jurisdiction. The scope of a patent claim is generally determined by an interpretation of the law, the written disclosure in a patent, and the patent’s prosecution history. Our interpretation of the relevance or the scope of a patent or a pending application may be incorrect or not accepted by a court of competent jurisdiction. Our determination of the expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect or inaccurate. Our failure to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to develop and market our MMRs.

There are several circumstances under which a patent application may not be published and accessible to us or our licensors. For example, patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, but some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued. Publications in scientific literature also often lag behind actual discoveries. Therefore, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications for technology covered by our issued patents or our pending applications, or that we were the first to invent the technology or to file a patent application covering the technology. Our competitors may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering our MMRs or technology similar to ours without us knowing. Any such patent application may have priority over our patent applications or patents, which could require us to procure rights to issued patents covering such technologies in order to avoid infringement claims.

We may be subject to claims of ownership and other rights to our patents and other intellectual property by third parties.

We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators, or other third parties have an interest in our patents or other intellectual property as an owner, a joint owner, a licensee, an inventor, or a co-inventor. In the latter two cases, the failure to name the proper inventors on a patent application can result in the patents issuing thereon being unenforceable. Inventorship disputes may arise from conflicting views regarding the contributions of different individuals named as inventors, the effects of foreign laws where foreign nationals are involved in the development of the subject matter of the patent, conflicting obligations of third parties involved in developing our patented technology or as a result of questions regarding co-ownership of potential joint inventions. Litigation may be necessary to resolve these and other claims challenging inventorship and ownership. Alternatively, or additionally, we may enter into agreements to clarify the scope of our rights in such intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose exclusive ownership of, or right to use or license valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Our management has limited experience in operating a public company.

Our executive officers have limited experience in the management of a publicly traded company and our management team may not successfully or effectively manage our transition to a public company that will be subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws. Their limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies could be a disadvantage and could result in an increasing amount of their time being devoted to compliance activities which would result in less time being devoted to the management and growth of the Company. We may not have adequate personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience, and training in the accounting policies, practices or internal controls over financial reporting required of public companies in the United States. The development and implementation of the standards and controls necessary for the Company to achieve the level of accounting standards required of a public company in the United States may require costs greater than expected. It is possible that we will be required to expand our employee base and hire additional employees to continue to support our operations as a public company which will increase our operating costs in future periods.

We are subject to data privacy and protection laws in multiple jurisdictions, including the GDPR, and any failure to comply with these laws could result in significant penalties and harm to our business.

In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store, transmit and otherwise process confidential information (including personal data) of our employees, contractors and business contacts and we are subject to data privacy and protection laws and regulations with respect to same. These laws include the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) (and the applicable national GDPR implementation acts), which applies to our operations in Italy and the broader European Economic Area, as well as an evolving patchwork of U.S. federal and state privacy laws and other global privacy laws in the jurisdictions where we operate. The GDPR imposes stringent requirements on data controllers and processors, including requirements for lawful processing, restrictions on cross-border data transfers, requirements for data processing agreements, data subject rights, requirements for appropriate technical and organizational security measures, and mandatory data breach notification obligations. Penalties for non-compliance with the GDPR can be significant, including fines of up to 4% of global annual turnover or €20 million, whichever is greater. We process personal data relating to our employees, contractors, and business contacts, and as our operations expand, the volume and sensitivity of personal data we process is likely to increase. The regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection is rapidly evolving, with new laws and amendments being enacted in jurisdictions where we operate or intend to operate. Compliance with these diverse and sometimes conflicting requirements is complex and costly, and our failure to comply could result in regulatory enforcement actions (including fines), (civil) litigation (including class actions), reputational harm, and restrictions on our ability to process personal data, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition, our international operations may implicate data localization requirements, restrictions on cross-border data transfers (such as requirements for the EU standard contractual clauses or other approved transfer mechanisms), and other compliance obligations that could increase our operational complexity and costs.

The use of artificial intelligence technologies may present business, legal, and regulatory risks.

We may utilize artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in our operations, including design optimization, predictive maintenance, and operational analytics. The regulatory landscape for AI is rapidly evolving, with the European Union’s AI Act and various U.S. federal and state initiatives introducing new compliance obligations for AI systems. Our use of AI in connection with nuclear operations may be subject to additional regulatory scrutiny by the NRC and other authorities. AI technologies may produce inaccurate, biased, or otherwise flawed outputs, which could result in operational inefficiencies, reputational harm, or liability. Our data center customers, who represent a significant portion of our target market, may be subject to AI-related regulations that could affect their operations and, indirectly, demand for our products. As AI regulation continues to evolve, compliance costs may increase, and we may be required to modify our use of AI technologies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Terra Innovatum’s Capital Resources

In order to fulfill our business plan, we will require substantial additional funding. To the extent we require such additional investor funding in the future, such funding may be dilutive to our investors and no assurances can be provided as to terms of any such funding. Any such funding and the associated terms will be highly dependent upon market conditions and the progress of our business at the time we seek such funding. The terms of any financing that we pursue may be less favorable than previously anticipated and could become even less favorable depending on the amount of funds we may require.

Our business is capital intensive. We expect that significant additional capital will be needed in the future to continue our planned operations, including commercialization efforts, expanded research and development activities and costs associated with operating a public company. To raise capital, we may enter into financing arrangements that may be costly or impose certain restrictive covenants or otherwise restrict our ability to seek additional leverage or financing. We may also seek to sell ordinary shares, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. If we sell ordinary shares, convertible securities or other equity securities, investors may be materially diluted by subsequent sales. Such sales may also result in material dilution to our existing shareholders, and new investors could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to the holders of our ordinary shares. Pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan, which became effective upon the Closing, our board is authorized to grant compensatory equity awards to our employees, directors and consultants. If the number of shares reserved under our Equity Incentive Plan is increased pursuant to the terms of our Equity Incentive Plan, our shareholders may experience additional dilution, which could cause our share price to fall. Any of the above events could significantly harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations and cause the price of our ordinary shares to decline.

Our corporate expenditures, including our corporate level expenses, are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.

Our current and future operating expenses are uncertain and impacted by various factors outside of our control, including rising costs and other impacts of inflation, evolving regulatory requirements, raw material availability, global conflicts, global supply chain challenges and component manufacturing and testing uncertainties, among other factors. Accordingly, it is possible that our overall expenses and related outspend could be higher than the levels we currently estimate, and any increases could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience a disproportionately higher impact from inflation and rising costs.

Inflation has resulted in, and may continue to result in, higher interest rates and capital costs, higher shipping costs, higher material costs, supply shortages, increased costs of labor and other similar effects. Although the impact of material cost, labor, or other inflationary or economically driven factors will impact the entire nuclear and energy transition industry (including renewable sources of electricity, like solar and wind), the relative impact may not be the same across the industry, and the particular effects within the industry will depend on a number of factors, including material use, design, structure of supply agreements, project management and others, which could result in significant changes to the competitiveness of our technology and our ability to sell SOLO reactors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we incur indebtedness in the future, we could be exposed to risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the future, we may incur indebtedness which could have significant negative consequences for our security holders, business, results of operations and financial condition by, among other things:

Our business may not generate sufficient funds, and we may otherwise be unable to maintain sufficient cash reserves, to pay any additional indebtedness that we may incur. Any future indebtedness that we may incur may contain financial and other restrictive covenants that will limit our ability to operate our business, raise capital or make payments under our indebtedness. If we fail to comply with such covenants or to make payments under any of our indebtedness when due, then we would be in default under that indebtedness, which could, in turn, result in that indebtedness becoming immediately payable in full and cross-default or cross-acceleration under our other indebtedness and other liabilities.

Our actual operating results may differ significantly from our guidance.

From time to time, we may release guidance in our quarterly earnings releases, quarterly earnings conference calls, or expectations regarding our future performance that represent our management’s estimates as of the date of release. This guidance, which includes forward-looking statements, will be based on projections prepared by our management. These projections are not expected to be prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and neither our registered public accountants nor any other independent expert or outside party is expected to comply or examine the projections. Accordingly, no such person is expected to express any opinion or any other form of assurance with respect to the projections.

Projections are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control, and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. Any material change to the assumptions or estimates underlying the projections management prepares, or any material overruns or other unexpected increase in costs, could have a material adverse effect on the projections and the guidance on which it is based. The rapidly evolving market in which we operate may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and our future prospects, including our ability to plan for and model future growth. We intend to state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed. However, actual results will vary from our guidance and the variations may be material. The principal reason that we release guidance is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook as of the date of release with analysts and investors. We do not accept any responsibility for any projections or reports published by any such persons. Investors are urged not to rely upon our guidance in making an investment decision regarding our ordinary shares.

Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the occurrence of any of the events or circumstances set forth in this “Risk Factors” section could result in our actual operating results being different from our guidance, and the differences may be adverse and material.

Our financial results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

We expect our revenue and operating results to vary from quarter to quarter. We may incur significant operating expenses during the start-up and early stages of contracts and may not be able to recognize corresponding revenue in that same quarter. We may also incur additional expenses when contracts are terminated or expire and are not renewed. We may also incur additional expenses when companies are newly acquired.

Additional factors that may cause our financial results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter include those addressed elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section and the following factors, among others:

Significant fluctuations in our operating results for a particular quarter could cause us to fall out of compliance with the financial covenants related to any potential future indebtedness, which if not waived, could restrict our access to capital and cause us to take extreme measures to pay down the debt, if any.

If we experience significant fluctuations in our operating results and rate of growth and fail to meet revenue and earnings expectations, our share price may fall rapidly and without advance notice.

Due to our limited operating history, our unproven and evolving business model and the unpredictability of our emerging industry, we may not be able to accurately forecast our rate of growth. We base our current and future expense levels and our investment plans on estimates of future revenue and future rate of growth. Our expenses and investments are, to a large extent, not fixed and we expect that these expenses will increase in the future. We may not be able to adjust our spending quickly enough if our revenue falls short of our expectations.

Our results of operations depend on both the growth of demand for the products and services we are going to offer in future and the general economic and business conditions throughout the world. A softening of demand for our products and services for any reason will harm our operating results. Terrorist attacks, armed hostilities and wars in the past created, and may in the future create economic and business uncertainty that may also adversely affect our results of operations.

Our revenue and operating results may also fluctuate due to other factors, including:

As a result of these and other factors, we expect that our operating results may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis. We believe that period-to period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful, and you should not rely upon them as an indication of future performance.

Changes in our accounting estimates and assumptions could negatively affect our financial position and results of operations.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. We are also required to make certain judgments that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each reporting period. We periodically evaluate our estimates and assumptions including, but not limited to, those relating to business acquisitions, revenue recognition, recoverability of assets including customer receivables, contingencies, valuation of financial instruments, stock-based compensation and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable based on specific circumstances. These assumptions and estimates involve the exercise of judgment and discretion, which may evolve over time in light of operational experience, regulatory direction, developments in accounting principles and other factors. Actual results could differ from these estimates as a result of changes in circumstances, assumptions, policies or developments in the business, which could materially affect our financial statements.

Our ability to pay dividends may be limited and the level of future dividends is subject to change.

We do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future. Payment of dividends on our shares in the future will be subject to business conditions, financial conditions, earnings, cash balances, commitments, strategic plans and other factors that the Board of Directors may deem relevant at the time it recommends approval of the dividend. Any dividend policy, once adopted, will be subject to change based on changes in statutory requirements, market trends, strategic developments, capital requirements and a number of other factors. In addition, under the Articles of Association and Dutch law, dividends may be declared on the Ordinary Shares only if the amount of equity exceeds the paid up and called up capital plus the reserves that have to be maintained pursuant to Dutch law or the Articles of Association. Further, even if we are permitted under the Articles of Association and Dutch law to pay cash dividends on our shares, we may not have sufficient cash to pay dividends in cash on our shares. We will be a holding company and our operations will be carried out through our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to pay dividends will primarily depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to generate earnings and to provide us with the necessary financial resources.

It may be difficult to enforce U.S. judgments against us.

We are a public limited liability company under the laws of the Netherlands, and a substantial portion of our assets are outside of the United States. Many of our directors and senior management are resident outside the United States, and all or a substantial portion of our respective assets may be located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for U.S. investors to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons. It may also be difficult for U.S. investors to enforce within the United States judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts outside the United States would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against us or our directors and officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. Therefore, it may be difficult to enforce U.S. judgments against us, our directors and officers and independent auditors.

Fluctuations in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates and Withholding Taxes May Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations and Cash Flows

The financial statements included in this annual report are presented in U.S. dollars, while a substantial portion of Terra Innovatum Global S.r.l.’s revenues, expenses and capital expenditures are denominated in euros. Accordingly, we are exposed to fluctuations in the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. For example, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro would reduce the reported U.S. dollar value of our euro-denominated revenues and assets, while a weakening of the U.S. dollar would increase the U.S. dollar value of our euro-denominated expenses and liabilities. Although we may enter into hedging arrangements to partially mitigate foreign currency risk, such transactions may not fully offset adverse movements, may entail significant costs and may expose us to additional risks, including counterparty credit risk and accounting volatility.

In addition, under Italian law, payments of dividends and interest by our Italian subsidiaries to U.S. or other non-Italian shareholders may be subject to withholding taxes at rates up to 26% unless reduced by an applicable tax treaty. Such withholding could reduce the net amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders, adversely impact the attractiveness of our ordinary shares to certain investors and, in certain circumstances, require us to incur additional costs to secure treaty relief or obtain tax indemnities. Any changes in Italian or U.S. withholding tax rates, amendments to existing treaties or interpretations by tax authorities could further increase our tax burden and reduce the value of your investment.

Risks Relating to Compliance with Law, Government Regulation and Litigation

Our business is subject to the policies, priorities, regulations, mandates of multiple governmental entities and may be negatively or positively impacted by any change thereto.

We are subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations relating to various aspects of our business, including with respect to use and possession of radioactive materials; design, manufacture, operations, marketing and export of nuclear technologies; employment and labor; tax; data security of the operational and information technology we use; health and safety; zoning and environmental issues. Laws and regulations at the foreign, federal, state and local levels frequently change and are often interpreted in different ways, especially in relation to new and emerging industries, and we cannot always reasonably predict the impact from, or the ultimate cost of compliance with, current or future regulatory or administrative changes. While we monitor these developments and devote a significant amount of management’s time and external resources towards compliance with these laws, regulations and guidelines, we cannot guarantee that these measures will be satisfactory to regulators or other third parties, such as our customers, who are also subject to extensive governmental regulation. Our efforts to comply with new and changing laws and regulations may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention. Moreover, changes in law, the imposition of new or additional regulations or the enactment of any new or more stringent legislation that impacts our business could require us to change the way we operate and could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, cash flows, financial condition, and lead to regulatory delays that could impact our ability to obtain licenses, certificates, authorizations, permits, approvals, and/or certifications from regulatory agencies (collectively referred to herein as “regulatory approvals”).

Our MMRs are subject to regulations in all jurisdictions related to nuclear safety, environmental, and financial qualification. Regulatory approvals, such as construction permits and operating licenses issued by the NRC, are necessary for our customers to construct and operate our MMRs. Our plans to deploy MMRs rely on timely receipt of such regulatory approvals in the jurisdictions in which we seek to do business. Such regulatory approval processes may be subject to change, can be technically challenging to address, may result in the imposition of conditions that impact the financial viability of our MMR products, and may also provide opportunities for third parties to lodge objections or seek more stringent requirements for our products.

Lastly, all of our facilities are subject to regulations regarding human health and safety, wastewater, stormwater, air emissions and storage of materials like petroleum. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be subject to fines or penalties from local, state, and federal regulators.

Uncertain global macro-economic and political conditions could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our results of operations are materially affected by economic and political conditions in the United States and internationally, including inflation, deflation, interest rates, availability of capital, energy and commodity prices, trade laws and the effects of governmental initiatives to manage economic conditions. Current or potential customers may delay or decrease spending on our products and services as their business and budgets are impacted by economic conditions. The inability of current and potential customers to pay us for our products and services may adversely affect our earnings and cash flows.

Ongoing global supply chain disruptions have increasingly affected both the availability and cost of raw materials, component manufacturing and deliveries. These disruptions may result in delays in equipment deliveries and cost escalations that could adversely affect our business.

We are subject to stringent export and import control laws and regulations, and our failure to comply with these laws and regulations or to obtain necessary authorizations, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If and when required, the inability to secure and maintain necessary export licenses or authorizations could negatively affect our ability to compete successfully or market our MMR technology for commercial applications. U.S. government agencies responsible for administering nuclear export control regulations have considerable discretion in interpreting and enforcing these regulations, as well as in approving, denying, or imposing specific conditions on authorizations to engage in controlled activities.

If we were unable to obtain authorization to export our technology, hardware, code, or technical assistance, our market opportunities would be limited, providing a competitive advantage to international suppliers of MMRs. Similarly, if export authorization could not be secured, we might need to implement design changes to our MMRs to address domestic supply chain issues, which could increase costs or lead to delays in the delivery of new plants and subsequent MMRs.

Failure to comply with export control laws and regulations could expose us to civil or criminal penalties, fines, investigations, more stringent compliance requirements, and loss of export privileges. In addition, changes to export control regulations or multilateral non-proliferation frameworks could further restrict our ability to export reactor components, technology, or technical data, materially and adversely affecting our international business prospects.

Changes in international trade policies, tariffs and treaties affecting imports and exports may have a material adverse effect on our performance or business prospects.

There have recently been significant changes to international trade policies and tariffs affecting imports and exports in tariffs on raw materials or could negatively affect our performance, and the current trade policy environment is characterized by considerable uncertainty. The United States has implemented a range of new tariffs and increases to existing tariffs, affecting steel, aluminum, and other raw materials and manufactured goods that may be relevant to our supply chain and operations. In response to these actions, other countries have imposed, are considering imposing, and may in the future impose new or increased tariffs on certain exports from the United States, including retaliatory tariffs that could increase the cost of our reactor systems for international customers and thereby reduce demand for our products in foreign markets.

There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and other countries with respect to trade policies, taxes, government regulations, and tariffs, and we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, current tariffs will continue or trade policies will change in the future. Furthermore, the renegotiation, suspension, or termination of existing free trade agreements or bilateral investment treaties by the United States or by countries in which we plan to deploy our technology could adversely affect our international business strategy. Any significant increase in tariffs on raw materials or components supplied for our reactors, or the imposition of retaliatory tariffs by foreign countries on U.S.-origin nuclear technology or equipment, could negatively affect our performance and business prospects.

Terrorist attacks, acts of war or natural disasters may adversely affect our operations.

Terrorist acts, acts of war or natural disasters may disrupt our operations, as well as the operations of the businesses in which we invest. Such acts, including the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, have created, and continue to create, economic and political uncertainties and have contributed to global economic instability. Future terrorist activities, military or security operations, or natural disasters could further weaken the domestic/global economies and create additional uncertainties, which may negatively impact our performance or business prospects. Losses from terrorist attacks and natural disasters are generally uninsurable.

In addition, the current U.S. political environment and the resulting uncertainties regarding actual and potential shifts in U.S. foreign investment, trade, taxation, economic, environmental and other policies, as well as the impact of geopolitical tension, such as a deterioration in the bilateral relationship between the U.S. and China or the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, could lead to disruption, instability and volatility in the global markets. Unfavorable economic conditions also would be expected to increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events may limit our ability to grow and could have a material negative impact on our operating results, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are part of the nuclear power industry, which is highly regulated. Our MMR designs similarly differ from reactors currently in operation, including with respect to potential industrial uses. As a result, the regulatory licensing and approval process for our nuclear power plants may be delayed and made more costly.

The nuclear power industry is highly regulated. All entities that operate nuclear power facilities, fabricate nuclear fuel, or transport special nuclear materials in the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC (except for those facilities and applications separately regulated by the DOE). Entities performing similar activities in other countries are subject to regulation by the NRC’s counterparts around the world.

Our MMR designs differ in certain respects from the reactors currently used at commercial nuclear power facilities. Because of these design differences, our reactor designs could result in more prolonged and extensive review by the NRC and its counterparts around the world. Our reactor development timeline depends on the relevant nuclear regulator’s acceptance and approval of technical information and documentation related to our reactor designs in the course of any design-specific licensing, certification, approval, or similar process, or in facility-specific licensing.

U.S. government agencies responsible for administering nuclear export control regulations have considerable discretion in interpreting and enforcing these regulations, as well as in approving, denying, or imposing specific conditions on authorizations to engage in controlled activities. This regulatory discretion, combined with our unique MMR design, could result in more prolonged and extensive reviews by the NRC and its counterparts around the world, potentially causing delays in our reactor development program and commercialization efforts. Regulators may also require additional information regarding reactor behavior or performance, necessitating unplanned analytical or experimental work that could cause further schedule delays and require additional research and development funding.

These key materials and components may also be particularly vulnerable to inflationary pressures and cost increases.

The equipment, components, and materials used in a nuclear power plant are subject to a heightened level of manufacturing and quality assurance scrutiny, in compliance with NRC regulations, applicable codes and nuclear industry standards. Moreover, it is critical to demonstrate in facility design and development that the materials used in the facility that will be exposed to radiation will perform in accordance with necessary design parameters. The heightened manufacturing and quality assurance requirements and regulatory oversight limit the number of potential suppliers from whom we can procure many types of equipment, components, and materials used in our reactors, as well as the types of facilities where we can test certain materials. These suppliers and the key materials and essential components may be particularly vulnerable to price increases, as a result of supply and demand dynamics, inflation and other price pressures. As a result, supplier delays, unexpected performance testing results, issues in the manufacturing process or procuring necessary materials, international procurement needs, regulatory compliance issues, component qualification issues or delays, increases in costs as a result of inflation or otherwise, and geopolitical considerations can all impact our ability to perform necessary R&D, assist a customer in licensing a reactor, construct and assist customers in operating a Terra Innovatum reactor design. This could impact our project timelines and costs, as well as affect potential customer interest in our reactors.

The public has the ability to intervene in licensing proceedings before the NRC for a reactor.

Under the Atomic Energy Act and the implementing NRC regulations, members of the public, state, or tribal governments may request a public hearing opposing the issuance of any NRC permit or license, or challenging portions of the license or permit application or of the NRC’s review. Certain NRC actions also include provision for a mandatory administrative hearing regardless of whether any contentions are submitted in conjunction with the action. These hearing processes may delay or prevent the issuance of required regulatory approvals (e.g., permits or licenses) for a customer’s MMR.

The SOLO designs have not yet been approved or licensed for use at any site by the NRC, and approval or licensing of these designs is not guaranteed.

Terra Innovatum submitted its regulatory engagement plan to the NRC in January 2025. Notwithstanding these actions, the SOLO designs have not yet been licensed or approved by the NRC, and no currently operating NRC-regulated reactor uses technology we use in SOLO.

If the NRC disagrees with our, or our customers’, licensing approach or the technical bases supporting the nuclear safety and environmental impact evaluations, the construction and operating license application processes could take longer than currently expected, or a license may not be granted at all, which could materially and adversely affect our business. Further, the NRC could impose conditions in a license that are not acceptable to us or our customers, which could materially and adversely affect our business. Any delays, conditions or unexpected requirements may increase costs for us or our customers and may result in uncertainty regarding the ability to deploy our technology in a predictable way, which may adversely impact our competitiveness.

 Even if the SOLO is licensed in the United States, we must still obtain approvals on a country-by-country basis to deploy these reactor technologies, which approvals may be delayed or denied or which may require modification to our design.

Even if the SOLO is licensed or approved in the United States, deploying our technology in other countries would require obtaining regulatory approvals in those jurisdictions. The regulatory framework for securing such approvals is complex, varies from country to country, and may involve authorities at national, sub-national, or local levels. Timelines are likely to be longer for initial deployments of our technology in any jurisdiction, as regulatory agencies may not be familiar with our technology or its differences from the legacy reactor designs used in existing nuclear power facilities. Moreover, other countries’ approval processes may differ significantly from the NRC’s process, or they may require modifications to certain aspects of our design as a condition of approval.

Some countries impose local content requirements or preferential procurement mandates on large infrastructure projects, including nuclear facilities. These requirements could increase our costs, necessitate the qualification of local suppliers who may not meet our quality standards, or limit our ability to use our preferred international supply chain. As a result, local content obligations could materially and adversely affect our financial performance in those markets.

Denial or delay in obtaining approvals abroad, whether due to regulatory, trade-related, or local content considerations, could materially and adversely affect our business outside the United States.

Our customers could incur substantial costs as a result of violations of, or liabilities under, environmental laws.

The operations and properties of our customers are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, management and disposal of hazardous, non-hazardous and radioactive materials and waste and remediation of releases of hazardous materials. Although Terra Innovatum’s business is to design and sell technology rather than to construct and own or operate power plants, we must design our technology so it complies with such laws and regulations. Compliance with environmental requirements could require our customers to incur significant expenditures or result in significant restrictions on their operations, and the failure to comply with such laws and regulations, including failing to obtain any necessary permits, could result in substantial fines or enforcement actions, including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring our customers to conduct or fund remedial or corrective measures, install pollution control equipment or perform other actions. More vigorous enforcement by regulatory agencies, the future enactment of more stringent laws, regulations or permit requirements, including relating to climate change, or other unanticipated events may arise in the future and adversely impact the market for our products or demand for our products from our customers, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our MMRs may not qualify as low-emissions or emissions-free pursuant to regulatory or incentive frameworks that consider emissions on a lifecycle basis or that otherwise account for fuel-cycle emissions or energy consumption.

While our MMRs generate no air emissions during operations, including no so-called greenhouse gases, our MMRs may nonetheless not qualify as providers of emissions-free, carbon-free, low-carbon or similar generating resources under emissions-limitation schemes that assess emissions on a lifecycle basis or that otherwise consider emissions from energy consumed in our fuel cycle. The failure of our MMRs to qualify for inclusion in emissions reduction or climate change related emissions control schemes, or emissions-based incentive programs may result in higher costs or lower revenues for us or our customers, and may adversely impact the demand for our products from our customers, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may become involved in litigation that may materially adversely affect us.

From time to time, we may become involved in various legal proceedings relating to matters incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including intellectual property, commercial, product liability, employment, class action, whistleblower and other litigation and claims, and governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources from the operation of our business and cause us to incur significant expenses or liability or require us to change our business practices. Because of the potential risks, expenses and uncertainties of litigation, from time to time, we may settle disputes, even where we believe that we have meritorious claims or defenses. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable, we cannot assure you that the results of any of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting and if our remediation of such material weaknesses is not effective, or if we fail to develop and maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable laws and regulations could be impaired.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of Dutch Law and the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the rules and regulations of the applicable listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Market. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting, and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming, and costly, and place significant strain on our personnel, systems, and resources.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We are continuing to develop and refine our disclosure controls, internal control over financial reporting and other procedures that are designed to ensure information required to be disclosed by us in our financial statements and in the reports that we will file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures, we have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting related costs and significant management oversight.

As further described in Section 9A, below, we identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our material weaknesses are related to (1) the lack of resources with adequate experience to execute internal controls over financial reporting at a level commensurate with public company requirements; (2) failure to complete a formal assessment of the impact of our de-SPAC transaction on our internal control environment; (3) failure to uplift our internal controls from a private-company operating environment to public company requirements; and (4) failure to implement a monitoring program to assess effectiveness of our internal controls.

We cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, and actions we may take in the future, will be sufficient to remediate the control deficiencies that led to a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting or that they will prevent or avoid potential future material weaknesses. Our current controls and any new controls we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business. Further, additional weaknesses in our internal controls may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could harm our operating results, may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that we are required to include in the periodic reports we will file with the SEC. However, while we remain an “emerging growth company,” we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the market price of our ordinary shares.

Our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until after we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our internal control over financial reporting is documented, designed or operating. Any failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations and could cause a decline in the price of our ordinary shares.

As a public company, and particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” significant resources and management oversight will be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Risk Relating to Tax Matters Applicable to Terra Innovatum

Changes in tax, tariff or fiscal policies could adversely affect demand for our products.

Imposition of any additional taxes and levies on our products could adversely affect the demand for our products and our results of operations. Changes in corporate and other taxation policies as well as changes in export and other incentives given by various governments, or import or tariff policies, could also adversely affect our results of operations. Considerable uncertainty surrounds the introduction and scope of tariffs by countries around the world, as well as the potential for trade actions, and the imposition of tariffs and trade restrictions as a result of international trade disputes or changes in trade policies may adversely affect our sales and profitability. The occurrence of any the above may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

As discussed above under the risk factor relating to international trade policies and tariffs, the tariff and trade policy environment is rapidly evolving and may have direct and indirect effects on our cost structure and the demand for our MMRs. To the extent that tariff-related cost increases or trade policy uncertainty causes our potential customers to delay purchasing decisions, this could materially and adversely affect our revenues and business prospects.

Changes to taxation or the interpretation or application of tax laws could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is expected to be subject to various taxes in different jurisdictions (currently, mainly Italy), which include, among others, the Italian corporate income tax (“IRES”), regional trade tax (“IRAP”), value added tax (“VAT”), excise duty, registration tax and other indirect taxes.

We are exposed to the risk that our overall tax burden may increase in the future.

Changes in tax laws or regulations, or in the position of the relevant Italian and non-Italian authorities regarding the application, administration or interpretation of these laws or regulations, particularly if applied retrospectively, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, tax laws are complex and subject to subjective valuations and interpretive decisions. The tax authorities may not agree with our interpretations of, or the positions we have taken or intend to take on, tax laws applicable to our ordinary activities and extraordinary transactions. In case of challenges by the tax authorities to our interpretations, we could face long tax proceedings that could result in the payment of additional tax and penalties, with potential material adverse effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We intend to be treated exclusively as a resident of the Republic of Italy for tax purposes, but Dutch or other tax authorities may seek to treat us as a tax resident of another jurisdiction as a result of which we could be subject to increased and/or different taxes.

We intend to continue being resident for fiscal purposes exclusively in the Republic of Italy. Indeed, we intend to maintain management and organizational structure in such a manner that (i) our place of effective management would be in Italy and we should be regarded as a tax resident of Italy for Italian domestic law purposes; (ii) we should be considered to be exclusively tax resident in Italy for purposes of the applicable tax treaties, including the Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Italy for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and on capital (the “Italy-Netherlands Tax Treaty”); and (iii) we should not be regarded as a tax resident of any jurisdiction other than Italy, either for purposes of the domestic tax laws of such jurisdiction or for the purposes of any applicable tax treaty.

However, the determination of our tax residency depends primarily upon our place of effective management, which is largely a question of fact, based on all relevant circumstances.

Therefore, no assurance can be given regarding the final determination of our tax residency by tax authorities. In addition, changes to applicable laws and income tax treaties or interpretations thereof and changes to applicable facts and circumstances (e.g., a change of board members or the place where board meetings take place), may have a bearing on the determination of our tax residency and the consequent tax treatment.

If the competent tax authorities of a jurisdiction other than Italy, including the Netherlands, take the position that we should be treated as (exclusively) tax resident of that jurisdiction for purposes of an applicable tax treaty, we would be subject to corporation tax and all distributions made by us to our shareholders would be subject to any applicable dividend withholding tax in such other jurisdiction(s) as well as in Italy.

To resolve any dual tax residency issue, we may have access to a mutual agreement procedure and/or dispute resolution mechanisms under an applicable tax treaty and the dispute resolution mechanism under the EU Arbitration Directive (if it is an EU jurisdiction), or we could submit our case for judicial review by the relevant courts.

These procedures would require substantial time, costs and efforts, and it is not certain that double taxation issues can be resolved in all circumstances.

Risks Related to Ownership of Terra Shares and Terra Operating as a Public Company

Our only significant asset is our ownership interest in Terra OpCo, and such ownership may not be sufficient to satisfy our financial obligations. 

We have no direct operations and no significant assets other than our ownership of Terra OpCo. We depend on Terra OpCo for distributions, loans and other payments to generate the funds necessary to meet our financial obligations, including our expenses as a publicly traded company and to pay any dividends with respect to Terra Shares. The financial condition and operating requirements of Terra OpCo may limit our ability to obtain cash from Terra OpCo. The earnings from, or other available assets of, Terra OpCo may not be sufficient to pay dividends or make distributions or loans to enable us to pay any dividends on Terra Ordinary Shares or satisfy our other financial obligations.

This lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate.

If a U.S. person is treated as owning at least 10% of the shares of Terra, such person may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

If a U.S. holder is treated as owning (directly, indirectly or constructively) at least 10% of the value or voting power of the stock of Terra, such holder may be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each of Terra and its direct and indirect subsidiaries (the “Terra Group”) that is a “controlled foreign corporation,” (a “CFC”), for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A non-U.S. corporation is considered a CFC if more than 50% of (1) the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of such corporation entitled to vote, or (2) the total value of the stock of such corporation is owned, or is considered as owned by applying certain constructive ownership rules, by United States shareholders on any day during the taxable year of such non-U.S. corporation. For our taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2025, and any taxable years of U.S. shareholders including that year, if the Terra Group includes one or more U.S. subsidiaries, certain of Terra’s non-U.S. subsidiaries could be treated as CFCs regardless of whether Terra otherwise is treated as a CFC. Immediately following the consummation of the Business Combination, the Terra Group included a U.S. subsidiary, so that Terra’s non-U.S. subsidiaries likely were considered CFCs for their taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2025.

If Terra or any of its non-U.S. subsidiaries is a CFC, 10% “United States shareholders” will be subject to adverse income inclusion and reporting requirements with respect to such CFC. No assurance can be provided that Terra will assist holders in determining whether it or any of its non-U.S. subsidiaries is treated as a CFC or whether any holder is treated as a United States shareholder with respect to any of such CFCs or furnish to any holder information that may be necessary to comply with reporting and tax payment obligations with respect to such CFCs.

The PFIC status of Terra could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders.

In general, a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year in which (i) 50% or more of the average value of its assets (generally determined on the basis of a weighted quarterly average) consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income, or (ii) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive income. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents and royalties (other than rents or royalties derived from the active conduct of a trade or business) and gains from the disposition of passive assets. Cash and cash equivalents generally are passive assets. For purposes of the PFIC rules, a non-U.S. corporation that owns, directly or indirectly, at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation and received directly its proportionate share of the income of the other corporation.

Prior to the Business Combination, GSR III believed that it was likely a PFIC due to GSR III being a blank check company with no active business (as determined for purposes of the PFIC rules). Following the Business Combination our annual PFIC income and asset tests applied based on the assets and activities of the combined business. Based on the composition of our gross income for the year ending December 31, 2025, we believe that we were a PFIC for the year ending December 31, 2025 and it is likely that we will be a PFIC for our 2026 taxable year. The determination of whether we are a PFIC is a fact-intensive determination made on an annual basis and the applicable law is subject to varying interpretation. In particular, the characterization of our assets as active or passive may depend in part on our current and intended future business plans, which are subject to change.

If we are characterized as a PFIC, our U.S. holders may suffer adverse tax consequences, including having gains realized on the sale of our shares treated as ordinary income, rather than as capital gain and the loss of the preferential rate applicable to dividends received on our shares by individuals who are U.S. holders, and having interest charges apply to distributions by us and the proceeds of sales of the shares. A U.S. shareholder of a PFIC generally may mitigate these adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences by making a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, election, or, to a lesser extent, a “mark to market” election.

If we determine that we are a PFIC for any taxable year, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to, and currently expect to, provide the necessary information for U.S. holders to make a QEF election. 

If analysts do not publish research about Terra’s business or if they publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, our share price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our ordinary shares depends in part on the research and reports that analysts publish about its business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover Terra downgrade our ordinary shares or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our ordinary shares would likely decline. If few analysts cover Terra, demand for our ordinary shares could decrease and its ordinary share price and trading volume may decline. Similar results may occur if one or more of these analysts stop covering Terra in the future or fail to publish reports on it regularly.

We may be subject to securities litigation, which is expensive and could divert management attention.

The market price of our ordinary shares may be volatile and, in the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their share have been subject to securities class action litigation.

We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm its business.

Future resales of our Ordinary Shares may cause the market price of our securities to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, subject to certain exceptions, the Sponsor and the Management Holders are contractually restricted from selling or transferring any of our ordinary shares. Such restrictions began at Closing and end on the following terms: (i) for the Lock-Up Shares held by the Management Holders (the “Terra Lock-Up Shares”) and (ii) for the Sponsor Lock-Up Shares, (a) 25% of the Terra Lock-Up Shares and Sponsor Lock-Up Shares shall be released upon the earlier of the Terra Trading Price being greater than $12.00 or Terra issuing its first quarterly earnings release that occurs at least 120 days after the Closing, (b) an additional 25% of the Terra Lock-Up Shares and Sponsor Lock-Up Shares shall be released upon the earlier of the Terra Trading Price being greater than $14.00 or Terra issuing its second quarterly earnings release that occurs at least 120 days after the Closing, (c) a further 25% of the Terra Lock-Up Shares and Sponsor Lock-Up Shares shall be released upon the earlier of the Terra Trading Price being greater than $16.00 or Terra issuing its third quarterly earnings release that occurs at least 120 days after the Closing and (d) all the remaining Terra Lock-Up Shares and Sponsor Lock-Up Shares shall be released upon the earlier of the Terra Trading Price being greater than $18.00 or Terra issuing its fourth quarterly earnings release that occurs at least 120 days after the Closing. As of the date of this annual report, 50% of the Terra Lock-Up Shares and Sponsor Lock-Up Shares have been released from these restrictions.

The shares held by Sponsor and the Management Holders may be sold after the expiration of the applicable lock-up period under the Registration Rights Agreement and the Bylaws. As restrictions on resale end and the registration statement becomes available for use, the sale or possibility of sale of these shares could have the effect of increasing the volatility in our share price or the market price of our Ordinary Shares could decline if the holders of currently restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them.

The obligations associated with being a public company involve significant expenses and require significant resources and management attention, which may divert from Terra’s business operations.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Exchange Act requires the filing of annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to a public company’s business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that a public company establish and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we as a private company, did not previously incur. Our entire management team and many of its other employees devotes substantial time to compliance and managing our transition into a public company.

These rules and regulations have resulted in us incurring substantial legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations have made it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and in the future it may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be difficult for us to continue to attract and retain qualified people to serve on our Board of Directors, the committees of our Board of Directors or as executive officers.

We are currently an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and to the extent we have taken advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.

We are currently an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we are taking advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.

Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company, which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Once we lose our “emerging growth company” status, we will no longer be able to take advantage of certain exemptions from reporting, and we will also be required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We will incur additional expenses in connection with such compliance and our management will need to devote additional time and effort to implement and comply with such requirements.

We are also a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million and our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. We will continue to be a smaller reporting company if either (i) the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million. If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an emerging growth company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and, similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Our headquarters are in Lucca, Italy. The offices are sub-leased. On April 1, 2025, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Nine Nuclear and Industrial Engineering S.R.L., a Related Party, to sublease three office rooms from a property unit located in Lucca, Sorbano del Giudice, Via della Chiesa XXXII n. 759. The three office rooms will be used exclusively for professional office purposes and related activities. The term of the lease agreement is 24 months starting from April 1, 2025 and ending on March 31, 2027. Each party may withdraw from the lease agreement at any time before the expiration date of the contract. The rent is €11,400 ($12,320 USD) per annum, €950 ($1,027 USD) per month plus €50 ($54 USD) monthly as a flat-rate reimbursement for utilities and cleaning costs (the “Lease Fee”), with the total monthly amount to be paid no later than the 10th of each month. The Lease Fee will be updated annually by 75% of the variation in the official consumer price indices for worker and employee families as determined by the Italian Statistics Day in the previous year and subsequently year by year, with the first update taking effect on April 1, 2026. The lease agreement is subject to VAT according to Italian tax regulations.

We believe that all our properties have been adequately maintained, are generally in good condition, and are suitable and adequate for our business.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are, and from time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently a party to any legal proceedings that in the opinion of our management, if determined adversely to us, would individually or taken together have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Defending such proceedings is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and team members. The results of any current or future litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our ordinary shares began trading on Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “NKLR” on October 10, 2025.

Number of Holders of our Securities

As of March 31, 2026, there were approximately 68 holders of record of our ordinary shares.  In computing the number of holders of record of our ordinary shares, each broker-dealer and clearing corporation holding shares on behalf of its customers is counted as a single shareholder.

Dividend Policy

We do not expect to pay dividends on our shares for the foreseeable future. Payment of dividends on our shares in the future will be subject to business conditions, financial conditions, earnings, cash balances, commitments, strategic plans and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant at the time it recommends approval of the dividend. Any dividend policy, once adopted, will be subject to change based on changes in statutory requirements, market trends, strategic developments, capital requirements and a number of other factors. In addition, under our Articles of Association and Dutch law, dividends may be declared on the Terra Shares only if the amount of equity exceeds the paid up and called up capital plus the reserves that have to be maintained pursuant to Dutch law and/or our Articles of Association. Further, even if we are permitted under our Articles of Association and Dutch law to pay cash dividends on our shares, we may not have sufficient cash to pay dividends in cash on such shares. We will be a holding company and our operations will be carried out through our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to pay dividends will primarily depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to generate earnings and to provide us with the necessary financial resources.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

See Item 12 “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters.”

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities 

PIPE Agreements

As previously announced, on September 23, 2025, GSR III entered into Subscription Agreements (the “PIPE Subscription Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Subscribers”), pursuant to which GSR III agreed to issue and sell 3,184,000 of its ordinary shares (the “PIPE Shares”), warrants to purchase up to 1,592,000 ordinary shares of GSR III at $12.00 per share (the “Half Warrants”) and warrants to purchase up to 796,000 ordinary shares of GSR III at $16.00 per share (the “Quarter Warrants”, and together with the Half Warrants, the “PIPE Warrants”), for an aggregate total of approximately $31.8 million.

Subsequent to September 23, 2025, GSR III entered into PIPE Subscription Agreements for an additional 499,500 PIPE Shares, Half Warrants to purchase up to 249,750 ordinary shares, and Quarter Warrants to purchase up to 124,875 ordinary shares, for an aggregate total of approximately $4.99 million.

The PIPE Warrants, issued in connection with closing of the PIPE Financing, are exercisable immediately upon issuance and have a term of five years from the date of issuance. The PIPE Shares and PIPE Warrants, as well as the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the PIPE Warrants, are subject to registration rights as described therein. Such description of the PIPE Subscription Agreement and the PIPE Warrants are qualified in their entirety by the text of the PIPE Subscription Agreement and PIPE Warrants, which are included as Exhibits 10.4, 4.1 and 4.2, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference.

On October 9, 2025, Terra entered into an assumption and assignment agreement with GSR III (the “Assignment Agreement”), pursuant to which Terra assumed all rights and obligations of GSR III under the PIPE Subscription Agreement and PIPE Warrants. Such description is qualified in its entirety by the text of the Assignment Agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.5 to this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.

The PIPE Shares and the PIPE Warrants issued and sold in the PIPE Investment have not been registered under the Securities Act and have been issued in reliance on the availability of an exemption from such registration.

Bridge Loans

As disclosed in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, between May 2025 and August 2025, Terra Innovatum entered into the Bridge Loans for gross cash proceeds of $5.0 million. The Bridge Loans accrued interest at a rate of 15.00% per annum, payable in kind (“PIK”) calculated on the outstanding principal balance. On the Closing, the principal and accrued interest on the Bridge Loans converted into 752,326 Ordinary Shares, in the aggregate, at a conversion price of $7.00 per share. Additionally, in connection with the Bridge Loans, as amended, Terra Innovatum committed to issue to the Bridge Loan Lenders following the business combination (i) warrants to purchase at an exercise price of $11.50 per share the number of Ordinary Shares equal to 100% of the number of Ordinary Shares into which the applicable Bridge Loan will convert into at Closing and (ii) warrants to purchase at an exercise price of $15.00 per share the number of Ordinary Shares equal to 100% of the number of Ordinary Shares into which the applicable Bridge Loan will convert into at Closing (the “Bridge Warrants”). The Bridge Warrants have an exercise period of 36 months from the Closing.

In August 2025 and September 2025, for certain lenders (“the lenders”), Terra Innovatum amended the terms of their outstanding Bridge Loan agreements including the terms of the associated warrant commitments. For the existing warrant commitments having an exercise price of $11.50 per share, the amendments increased the number of shares underlying such warrants to equal 100% of the shares issuable upon conversion of the Bridge Loans, and shortened the exercise period of warrants held by certain lenders from 48 months to 36 months. Additionally, Terra Innovatum added a commitment to issue to the lenders new warrants having a number of underlying common shares equal to 100% of the shares issuable upon conversion of the Bridge Loans and an exercise price of $15.00 per share.

In September 2025 Terra Innovatum entered into additional Bridge Loans for additional aggregate proceeds of $690,000 having comparable terms as the original Bridge Loans, as amended, including with respect to warrant coverage and terms of the Bridge Warrants for the additional Bridge Loans. On the Closing, the principal and accrued interest on the additional Bridge Loans converted into 99,157 Ordinary Shares, in the aggregate, at a conversion price of $7.00 per share.

The description of the Bridge Warrants is qualified in its entirety by the text of the Bridge Warrants, a form of which is included as Exhibit 4.3, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 6. [Reserved]

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis provides information that Terra Innovatum Global N.V. management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of Terra Innovatum Global N.V.’s results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read together with Terra Innovatum Global N.V’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Terra Innovatum Global N.V.’s actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” or in other parts of this Form 10-K.

Presentation of Financial Information 

Beginning with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, we have elected to present all dollar amounts rounded to the nearest thousand dollars, unless otherwise indicated. In prior periods, including those presented in the Form S-4 Amendment No. 5 filed on September 11, 2025, financial information was presented in whole dollars. This change has been made to enhance the readability and consistency of financial disclosures. As a result, certain prior period amounts may not be directly comparable due to rounding differences.

Company Overview

We are a pioneering nuclear energy technology company developing the SOLO^TM Micro-Modular Nuclear Reactor (“SOLO”), a breakthrough solution designed to address critical challenges in affordable clean decentralized energy production. Our reactor represents a significant technological and engineering advancement, offering a compact, safe, and economically compelling alternative to traditional energy generation and supply solutions. The SOLO reactor’s core innovation lies in its ability to generate 1 MWe of electricity baseload with a continuous operational cycle of up to 15 years, extendable to 45 years through refueling, with a fixed and competitive projected levelized cost of energy. Our strategic roadmap targets commercial deployment by 2028, with a clear focus on delivering a scalable, modular nuclear solution that can be deployed across diverse geographies and markets — from industrial and infrastructure to remote and off-grid applications. Key differentiators include a gas-cooled design, multiple safety shutdown mechanisms, safeguard-by-design, small footprint, and the ability to use commercially available Low Enriched Uranium (“LEU”), which significantly reduces regulatory and technological barriers typical in nuclear energy development. We have made substantial progress in de-risking its First-of-a-Kind (“FOAK”) reactor, including initiating regulatory engagement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), and establishing a robust supply chain strategy. We have completed the reactor design, validated key technological components, and are targeting licensing and commercial deployment of the FOAK reactor by 2028.

Recent Developments

Business Combination and Public Listing

On October 9, 2025, we completed our Business Combination with GSR III Acquisition Corp. (“GSR III”), pursuant to a Business Combination Agreement executed in April 2025. In connection with the transaction, Terra Innovatum Srl. completed a reorganization, including the formation of Terra Innovatum Global Srl., the contribution of all Terra Innovatum Srl. quotas, and a cross-border conversion into Terra Innovatum Global N.V. (“Terra”). At Closing, all GSR III securities converted into Terra ordinary shares on a one-for-one basis (net of redemptions), and Private Investment in Public Equity (“PIPE”) investors purchased securities at $10.00 per share. Net proceeds from the Business Combination and PIPE financing totaled approximately $106,713. The transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization, with Terra as the accounting acquirer.

Conversion of Bridge Loans

Between May and September 2025, we issued $5,690 of unsecured bridge loans (the “Bridge Loans”) bearing 15% payment in kind (“PIK”) interest. Upon Closing of the Business Combination, all outstanding notes converted into 851,483 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $7.00 per share, and we issued warrants to purchase up to 851,483 ordinary shares at exercise prices of $11.50 and $15.00 each with a 36-month term. No Bridge Loan financing remained outstanding after conversion.

Preferred Share Conversion

At the Closing of the Business Combination, we issued 8,040 Convertible Preferred Shares, which are contingently convertible into ordinary shares based on milestone achievement. On October 16, 2025, certain milestones were met, and on November 13, 2025, our Board of Directors issued a confirmation statement in connection with the conversion of 4,020 preferred shares into 40,200,000 ordinary shares. Following the conversion, 4,020 preferred shares remained outstanding.

Related Party Agreements

Massimo Morichi

On April 18, 2025, we entered into a consulting agreement with Massimo Morici, our Chief Strategy Officer and a member of the Board of Directors, which was amended on December 23, 2025 and extended to December 31, 2025, pursuant to which Mr. Morici provided strategic and consulting services to us. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we awarded Mr. Morici an extraordinary bonus of $119 in connection with the completion of the business combination and related listing, $79 for reimbursable expenses under the agreement (treated as compensation for services) and $198 to Mr. Morici for his consultancy services. This consultancy expired on December 31, 2025.

Guillaume Moyen

On April 4, 2025, we entered into a consulting agreement with Guillaume Moyen, our former Chief Financial Officer and member of the Board of Directors, which was amended on September 30, 2025, pursuant to which Mr. Moyen provided business support and advisory services to us. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we awarded Mr. Moyen an extraordinary bonus of $100 in connection with the completion of the business combination and related listing and $167 to Mr. Moyen for his consultancy services. This consultancy expired on December 31, 2025.

Related Party Loan

During 2024 and 2025, we entered into two interest-free loan agreements with Terra Innovatum Srl. legacy quotaholders (related parties) consisting of (i) an agreement executed in 2024 for approximately $216 (the “2024 Loan Agreement”), which was fully funded by March 31, 2025, and (ii) an agreement executed on March 21, 2025 for $74 (the “2025 Loan Agreement”), which was funded through April 10, 2025. Both loans were unsecured and scheduled to mature on December 31, 2040, with automatic annual extensions permitted through December 31, 2045, unless earlier repayment was requested by the legacy Terra Innovatum Srl. quotaholders. The loans were issued at par with no fees or discounts and do not include any rights or preferences that would affect the economics of the arrangement; accordingly, the terms were negotiated directly with related parties and were not intended to reflect market-based pricing.

Because the lenders were related parties, we applied the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC’) 835-30 related-party exception and did not impute interest. The loans were repaid in full upon the Closing of the Business Combination, and no amounts were outstanding as of December 31, 2025.

Lease Agreement

On April 1, 2025, we entered into a lease agreement with Nine Nuclear and Industrial Engineering S.R.L. (“Nine”), a related party, to sublease three office rooms from a property unit located in Lucca, Sorbano del Giudice, Via della Chiesa XXXII n. 759. The three office rooms will be used exclusively for professional office purposes and related activities. The term of the lease agreement is 24 months starting from April 1, 2025 and ending on March 31, 2027. Each party may withdraw from the lease agreement at any time before the expiration date of the contract without any penalty. The rent is $12 (€11) per annum, $1 (€1) and an immaterial monthly fee as a flat-rate reimbursement for utilities and cleaning costs (the “Lease Fee”), with the total monthly amount to be paid no later than the 10^th of each month. The Lease Fee will be updated annually by 75% of the variation in the official consumer price indices for worker and employee families as determined by the Italian Statistics Day (“ISTAT”) in the previous year and subsequently year by year, with the first update taking effect on April 1, 2026. During the year ended December 31, 2025 we paid $10 in rent.

Engineering Services Agreements

In July 2025, we entered into an engineering services agreement with Nine, a related party, to support the design of the SOLO project. Per the terms of the agreement, Nine committed to deliver certain technical services to us with a total value of $215 (€184) plus value added tax (“VAT”). We expensed the costs associated with these services during the year ended December 31, 2025. Any unpaid amounts as of year-end are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

In July 2025, we entered into an engineering services agreement with FPoliSolutions LLC (“FPoli Solutions”), a related party. As per the terms of the agreement, FPoliSolutions will provide support for the development of the SOLO Micro Modular Reactor including technical assistance in safety analysis, hazard modeling, radiological consequence evaluation, risk-informed safety assessments, and techno-economic analysis for $90 with work completed during September 2025.

In October 2025, we entered into an amendment to our existing engineering services agreement with FPoliSolutions. The amendment extends the scope of work through December 31, 2025, and adds one full-time engineer on a fixed-price basis of $107.

SPAC Financial Advisory Services 

On December 18, 2024, we entered into an engagement letter with a financial advisory services provider (the “SPAC Financial Advisor”) to assist with the negotiation, structuring, and execution of our business combination with a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) (the “SPAC Financial Advisory Services Agreement”). Under the agreement, the SPAC Financial Advisor also supported the preparation of marketing materials and efforts to secure potential backstop financing.

In connection with the Closing on October 9, 2025, we issued 223,000 ordinary shares to the SPAC Financial Advisor and also issued 40 Convertible Preferred Shares, which were contingently convertible into our ordinary shares at a ratio of 10,000 ordinary shares per Convertible Preferred Share, subject to milestone-based tranche conversion conditions pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement and the SPAC Financial Advisory Services Agreement. On October 16, 2025, certain conversion milestones were achieved, and on November 13, 2025, our Board of Directors issued a confirmation statement in connection with the conversion of 20 preferred shares resulting in the issuance of 200,000 ordinary shares to the SPAC Financial Advisor.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we paid the cash success fee of $2,500 and the milestone fee of $225. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we paid the retainer fee of $50 and the LOI signature fee of $25. As of December 31, 2025, we had no non-cancelable remaining cash commitments under the SPAC Financial Advisory Services Agreement, as all remaining obligations are either contingent on future events or relate to reimbursable costs recognized when incurred.

Investor Relations and Advisory Services Agreements

In October 2025, we entered into an investor relations and advisory services agreement (the “October 27, 2025 Investor Relations and Advisory Services Agreement”) with the same vendor, effective November 1, 2025. The initial term extends through April 30, 2026, with automatic annual renewals unless terminated by either party with 60 days’ notice.

The agreement provides for a fixed monthly fee of $25, covering up to 84 hours of services allocated as follows: (i) 50 hours of investor relations, public relations, media, capital markets, and market-intelligence support for $17; (ii) 14 hours of social-media and communications services for $4; and (iii) 20 hours of business-development support for $5. We are also required to pay a 3% monthly service fee related to access to market-intelligence platforms. Additional services, including support for special situations such as M&A or crisis management, are billed at the vendor’s standard hourly rates, which may reach up to $1 per hour depending on personnel level.

Capital Markets Advisory Agreements

September 22, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement

In September 2025, we entered into a agreement (the “September 22, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement”) for a 12-month engagement period commencing August 19, 2025. Under the agreement, the vendor provides strategic capital markets advisory services, including support through the Closing and post-close public company advisory. As consideration for these services, a cash fee of $150 is payable upon close of the business combination, with additional cash fees of $125 90 days after close and $125 180 days after close. The agreement includes standard indemnification provisions and may be terminated upon 10 days’ written notice.

October 14, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement

In October 2025, we entered into a agreement (the “October 14, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement”) with a vendor for a term of 24 months. Under the agreement, the vendor will provide advisory services including assistance with research coverage, investor meetings, non-deal roadshows, and participation in the vendor hosted investor conferences. As compensation for these services, a total of $600 is due, structured as follows: $300 in cash, payable 12 months from the agreement date and $300 in cash, payable 24 months from the agreement date. These fees are subject to reduction by any fees paid to the vendor for other transactions during the term, up to a maximum offset of $600. In the event of a change of control during the term, the full advisory fee becomes immediately due and payable. The agreement contains standard indemnification clauses and may be terminated earlier only in the event of breach or for cause.

October 23, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement

In October 2025, we entered into an agreement (the “October 23, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement”) with a vendor to serve as our financial and capital markets advisor for a one-year term. Under the agreement, the vendor will provide advisory services including investor positioning, coordination of investor meetings, and participation in investor conferences, among other mutually agreed services. As consideration for these services, an advisory fee of $700 is due, payable in three installments, $233 which was paid upon execution of the agreement in October 2025, $233 on March 15, 2026, and $233 upon the end of the term of the agreement, October 23, 2026. The agreement contains standard indemnification clauses and may be terminated earlier only in the event of breach or for cause.

October 27, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement

In October 2025, we entered into an agreement (the “October 27, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement”) with a vendor for a 12-month engagement period beginning January 1, 2026. Under the October 27, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement, the vendor will provide strategic capital markets advisory services, including development of capital market strategy, institutional investor relationship development, participation in conferences and investor meetings and non-deal roadshows and related support. As compensation for these services, an advisory fee of $350 is due, structured as follows: $105 which was paid upon execution of the agreement on October 27, 2025 and $245 payable on January 1, 2026. The October 27, 2025 Capital Markets Advisory Agreement includes standard indemnification clauses and may be terminated with 90 days’ written notice.

Engineering Services Agreement

In December 2025, we entered into a agreement (the “December 1, 2025 Engineering Services Agreement”) for vendor-provided engineering services in support of SOLO licensing activities. The agreement specifies total consideration of €433 (plus applicable VAT), payable in four monthly installments of €108.25 each, with payment due within 10 days of invoice. The agreement includes customary confidentiality, intellectual property, and governing-law provisions. The agreement contains standard indemnification clauses and may be terminated only for material breach, in which case we are obligated to pay only for services rendered through termination date.

Feasibility and Industrialization Study Agreement

In November 2025, we entered into an agreement with a vendor to conduct a feasibility and industrialization study (the “Feasibility and Industrialization Study Agreement”) for the SOLO Micro Modular Nuclear Reactor project. The Feasibility and Industrialization Study Agreement outlines a comprehensive scope of engineering, fabrication planning, cost analysis, and regulatory support activities to be performed by the vendor. Under the Feasibility and Industrialization Study Agreement, total consideration based on estimated man-hours and hourly rates as defined in the agreement is due with a payment structure including 10% of the total price payable within 7 days of execution, and the remaining balance payable monthly based on progress milestones and time sheets.

The Feasibility and Industrialization Study Agreement allows for price adjustments if actual man-hours exceed estimates by more than 5%, or if additional activities are agreed upon. Any such adjustments will be subject to separate written agreement. The term of the Feasibility and industrialization Study Agreement is a minimum of 6 months and up to 24 months, effective upon receipt of the advance payment. Either party may terminate the agreement under specified conditions, including non-payment or breach.

Senior Advisor Agreement

On August 21, 2025, we entered into an agreement (the “Senior Advisor Agreement”) with an independent contractor to serve as a strategic advisor and promoter for us, particularly in connection with the Business Combination. The term of the Senior Advisor Agreement is 36 months and outlines the independent contractor’s responsibilities, including strategic advisory, business development, investor introductions, and support for commercial agreements related to SOLO. Compensation includes a one-time grant of 180,000 restricted shares in the post-combination public entity (vesting over 36 months) and 1% commission on qualifying new business the independent contractor originates. As of December 31, 2025, these restricted shares have not been granted.

Financial Performance

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we reported a net income of $539,524 and net loss of $34, respectively. Net cash used by operating activities was $10,297 for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to net cash used of $42 for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Key Factors and Trends Affecting Our Business and Results of Operations

We believe the following factors and trends may cause previously reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results or future financial conditions: 

The commercial rollout of any advanced nuclear reactors depends on securing regulatory approvals for its design, construction, and operation. Our regulatory engagement plan was submitted to the NRC, and the NRC is currently reviewing a number of safety related topics related to SOLO. Although our team has significant prior experience working with the NRC, we cannot control NRC’s review process and review periods may take longer than anticipated.

We have limited financial resources. There can be no assurance that sufficient funding will be available to us to fund our operating expenses and to further develop our business. We anticipate that we will likely need to raise additional capital to fund our operations while we implement and execute our business plan. Our continued solvency is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional working capital to complete our reactor development, to successfully market our reactors and to achieve commerciality for our reactors. We have encountered and expect to continue to encounter risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by companies in rapidly evolving industries. Accordingly, we may be unable to prepare accurate internal financial forecasts or replace anticipated revenue that we do not receive as a result of delays, changed circumstances, or changed market conditions arising from these factors, and our results of operations in future reporting periods may be below the expectations of investors or analysts.

Our business operates in a complex global environment with multiple interconnected economic factors that can significantly impact our technological development, regulatory trajectory, and potential market penetration. As a nuclear technology company with an international human capital strategy and multinational supply chain, we are sensitive to macroeconomic trends and risks.

We utilize a strategic outsourced manufacturing approach for the SOLO project, leveraging international human resources and implementing an international manufacturing model for our FOAK reactor. This strategy exposes us to global supply chain vulnerabilities, including potential impacts from geopolitical tensions, trade agreements, tariffs, and manufacturing disruptions. Our current assembly preparation in Europe for reactor deployment in the U.S. introduces additional complexity in navigating international trade regulations, currency exchange risks, and logistical challenges.  

By partnering with specialized suppliers certified in nuclear engineering and precision manufacturing, we aim to avoid significant capital investments in manufacturing facilities and concentrate our resources on core competencies such as reactor design, technological innovation, and regulatory compliance. Our procurement strategy involves direct engagement with multiple suppliers for critical components, ensuring supply chain reliability and maintaining the flexibility to adapt our technology to evolving market and regulatory requirements.

Inflationary trends represent a risk to our development trajectory. Escalating costs in specialized manufacturing, regulatory compliance, technical talent acquisition, and raw material procurement could potentially erode our projected economic advantages.

The global energy transition, driven by decarbonization efforts and increasing demand for reliable low-carbon baseload power, creates both opportunities and challenges. The explosive growth in data center energy requirements, particularly with artificial intelligence (“AI”) and computational infrastructure expansion, presents a promising market segment. However, economic growth cycles, shifts in energy policy, and potential slowdowns in technological adoption could materially affect our market positioning and revenue projections.

To mitigate the AI driven market concentration risks, we have strategically designed SOLO with multi-sector versatility, targeting a diverse range of energy-intensive industries including industrial manufacturing (cement, steel, mining, paper production), critical infrastructure services (airports, ports, logistics hubs), agricultural and food processing applications (greenhouses, vertical farming, food processing plants), energy storage (ammonia production, pink hydrogen) and essential utility services like desalination and water treatment. This intentional market diversification allows us to create resilience against sector-specific economic fluctuations, leveraging SOLO’s ability to provide both electricity and thermal energy across multiple high-demand sectors, including emerging opportunities in medical radioisotope production.

Our multinational operational model requires navigating complex regulatory environments across different jurisdictions. Changes in nuclear energy policies and geopolitical tensions could significantly impact our potential market access. The evolving global stance on nuclear energy, particularly small modular reactors, introduces both strategic opportunities and potential regulatory constraints.

The specialized nature of our technology demands access to a global pool of highly skilled technical talent. Potential labor market shifts, competition for specialized nuclear engineering expertise, and varying international education and training standards could influence our human resource strategy and technology development velocity.

Macroeconomic uncertainties, including potential recessionary periods, fluctuations in investment trends in energy related technology, and broader economic growth patterns, could affect our funding capabilities, customer acquisition strategies, and overall business development trajectory.

Emerging Growth Company and Smaller Reporting Company Status

Section 102(b)(1) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”) exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. Until we are considered to be an emerging growth company, we have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when an accounting standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, as an emerging growth company we can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard.

We are also a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies until the fiscal year following the determination that our voting and non-voting ordinary shares held by non-affiliates is $250,000 or more measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenues are less than $100,000 during the most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting ordinary shares held by non-affiliates is $700,000 or more measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter.

Segment Reporting

We are a development-stage nuclear energy technology company focused on the research, development, and future commercialization of our SOLO micro-modular nuclear reactor. Our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), consisting of our chief executive officer and founding officers acting collectively, reviews financial information on a consolidated basis for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources. The CODM does not review discrete financial information by product, function, or geographic location. As a result, we have determined that we operate as a single operating segment, which is also our sole reportable segment. The measure of segment profit or loss and segment assets is the same as that presented in the consolidated financial statements. The CODM primarily uses consolidated general and administrative expenses and development costs to assess operating performance and liquidity. We have not generated revenue from external customers, as our SOLO product remains under development.

Results of Operations

The period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations have been prepared using the historical periods included in our financial statements. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Key Components of Results of Operations

Revenue

To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales and do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products for the foreseeable future. 

Operating Expenses

General and administrative

Our general and administrative consists primarily of advisory fees in connection with the Business Combination, legal fees, audit, accounting and other professional services fees, share-settled contingent liability fees, Board of Directors compensation, insurance fees, transportation costs, fees for food and lodging, advertising fees, patent application fees, rental costs, certificates and procedure fees, employee benefits, bank charges, periodic fees, and other miscellaneous expenses.

Development costs

Development costs represent costs incurred to design and engineer SOLO. These costs include technical consulting and personnel-related expenses (such as salaries, employee benefits, and bonuses), software and computing costs, hardware and experimental supplies, and fees for outside engineering, analytical, and consulting services.

Other Income (Expenses)

Other income — related party

Our other income-related party consists of fees from engineering consulting services that we provide to related parties that are unrelated to our core business. We do not expect to earn these fees following the Business Combination.

Other expense, net

Our other expense, net primarily consists of other expenses associated with the Bridge Loans, foreign currency transaction gains and losses, and interest.

Interest expense

Our interest expense consists of interest recorded for the Bridge Loans.

Change in fair value – share settled contingent liability

The change in fair value — share settled contingent liability consists of the change in fair value of certain issuances of Convertible Preferred Shares.

Change in fair value — warrant liabilities

The change in fair value — warrant liabilities consists of the change in fair value of certain PIPE and Bridge Loan warrants.

Provision for income taxes

Provision (or benefit) for income taxes consists of the expense or income related to income taxes.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

The following table sets forth our historical results for the periods indicated and the changes between periods:

NM – not meaningful

Operating Expenses

General and administrative

General and administrative increased by $32,233 for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 primarily due to increases of (i) $19,725 related to the share-settled contingent liability, (ii) $7,207 for compensation to third parties, (iii) $2,082 for board of director compensation, (iv) $1,774 for professional fees, (v) $594 for insurance, (vi) $250 for transportation, (vii) $211 for food and lodging, and (viii) $100 for advertising. The remaining $290 increase is primarily driven by patent application fees, rental costs, certificates and procedures, employee benefits, bank charges, periodic fees, and other miscellaneous expenses.

We expect to continue to incur additional general and administrative expenses as a result of operating as a public company, including expenses related to compliance with the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Nasdaq Stock Market, additional insurance costs, investor relations activities and other administrative and professional services. As a result, we expect general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars in future periods.

Development costs

Development costs increased by $1,313 for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 primarily due to increases of $1,256 in technical consultancy fees and $25 in salaries and wages. The remaining $32 increase is primarily driven by employee benefits and travel costs. 

Other Income (Expense)

Other income — related party

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we provided $129 of engineering consulting services to an affiliate unrelated to our core business. These services are considered other income associated with related parties and were not provided during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Other expense, net

Other expense, net was $1,906 during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to zero during the same period in 2024. This was primarily due to (i) a $1,372 increase driven by non-cash losses recognized upon issuance of bridge loan warrants, as the fair value of the warrants exceeded the associated loan proceeds at initial recognition, and a (ii) net foreign currency loss of $1,028, which is partially offset by (iii) an increase in interest income of $494.

Interest expense

Interest expense totaled $1,426 for the year ended December 31, 2025, attributable to the Bridge Loans. There was no interest expense during the same period in 2024.

Change in fair value – share settled contingent liability

There was a $559,967 unrealized gain in fair value attributable to the change in fair value of the share settled contingent liability. There was no share settled contingent liability in 2024.

Change in fair value — warrant liabilities

The $16,588 unrealized gain in fair value attributable to warrant liabilities consists of the change in fair value of certain PIPE and Bridge Loan warrants. There was no warrant liability in 2024.

Provision for income taxes

The provision for income taxes decreased from $10 to zero from the year ended December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025.

Net income (loss)

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $539,524 compared to net loss of $34 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The $539,558 net change was primarily due to the $559,967 unrealized gain on change in fair value - share settled contingent liability and $16,588 unrealized gain on change in fair value of warrant liabilities. These increases were partially offset by increases of $33,546 in operating expenses, $1,906 in other expense, net and $1,426 in interest expense. The remaining $119 net change is primarily attributable to the decreases in other income from related party and provision for income taxes from the year ended December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity represents our ability to generate sufficient cash to support ongoing operations, meet obligations, and fund future growth. Since inception, we have financed our activities primarily through capital contributions, as we have not yet generated revenue from our core operations. We do not expect to generate meaningful revenue unless and until we complete development, obtain regulatory licenses, and enter the commercialization phase of the SOLO, which we do not anticipate before 2028. Accordingly, we are dependent on our existing cash resources to fund operations while we advance toward commercialization. In the short term, our liquidity is supported by the proceeds received upon closing the Business Combination on October 9, 2025, which, together with the related PIPE financing, generated net proceeds of approximately $106,713. At Closing, all outstanding Bridge Loans converted into 851,483 ordinary shares at a price of $7.00 per share, eliminating near-term debt service commitments. We expect to outsource manufacturing activities, which reduces near-term capital expenditure requirements.

As of December 31, 2025, we had cash of $102,882 and an accumulated deficit of approximately $607,276. Net cash used in operating activities was $10,297 for the year ended December 31, 2025. We have historically incurred recurring operating losses and generated negative cash flows from operations.

We continue to evaluate and pursue potential liquidity-enhancing actions, which may include equity or debt financing, strategic transactions, or other funding arrangements; however, no definitive agreements are currently in place. Until sufficient funding is obtained or obligations are otherwise satisfied, we may be required to limit discretionary spending and defer or scale back certain planned activities.

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, and our primary uses of liquidity are operating expenses and licensing activities. We continue to actively monitor our liquidity position and may seek additional financing, including future equity offerings, strategic arrangements, or other capital-raising transactions, to support our long-term development and commercialization strategy.

Contractual Cash Requirements (Cancellable Agreements) 

As discussed under “Recent Developments” above, we entered into several advisory and engineering arrangements during 2024 and 2025 in connection with the Business Combination and our post-combination activities. Although these agreements are cancellable under their respective terms and therefore do not constitute non-cancelable purchase commitments, we currently expect to incur cash outflows associated with these arrangements under our ongoing operating plan.

Cash Flows

The following table provides detailed information about our net cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Operating Activities

Net cash used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $10,297. This amount was primarily driven by (i) net income of $539,524, (ii) non-cash adjustments of $553,996, (iii) net working capital increases of $4,173, and (iv) an increase in other non-current liabilities of $2.

Net cash used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $42. This amount was primarily attributable to (i) net loss of $34 and (ii) net working capital decreases of $12, which is partially offset by (iii) an increase in other non-current liabilities of $4.

Investing Activities

Net cash used by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $108, which was related to the purchases of equipment. There was no net cash from investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities of $112,263 for the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily driven by (i) $69,878 of proceeds from Business Combinations, net of transaction costs, (ii) $36,835 of proceeds from PIPE financing, and (iii) $5,690 of proceeds from Bridge Loans. The proceeds were partially offset by $116 of payments to related party loans and $24 of debt issuance cost payments related to Bridge Loans.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 consisted of proceeds of $112 from an interest-free loan agreement that we entered into with our shareholders on December 18, 2024. 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical Accounting Policy: Bridge Financing and Warrants

In connection with our financing activities, we entered into Bridge Loan agreements that include detachable warrants. We also entered into PIPE warrants and advisor warrant agreements. These arrangements require us to evaluate whether certain debt and warrant instruments represent freestanding financial instruments and, where applicable, determine the appropriate classification under ASC 480-10 and ASC 815-40. In addition, we evaluated whether these instruments met the definition of a derivative under ASC 815-10.

We determined that certain instruments, including the Bridge Loan Warrants and PIPE Warrants, meet the definition of a derivative, as they include an underlying (our common shares), require no initial net investment, and may be subject to net settlement. In performing this assessment, we considered whether the underlying shares associated with the instruments could be rapidly absorbed into the market, including analysis of trading volume. Other instruments, such as advisor warrants, are not within the scope of ASC 480 or ASC 815 and are classified as equity.

While the classification of certain warrants is based on the specific contractual terms and the application of relevant accounting guidance, the accounting for the overall bridge financing arrangements involves significant judgment and estimation. In particular, we are required to determine the fair value of the detachable warrants at issuance. Certain warrants are contingently issuable upon the occurrence of specified events; however, such warrants are considered issued for accounting purposes and are recognized at fair value upon inception.

As a result, the initial carrying value of the bridge loan may differ significantly from the proceeds received, and in certain cases, a loss may be recognized at inception when the fair value of the warrants exceeds the proceeds received.

Warrants that do not meet all criteria for equity classification are recorded as liabilities at fair value and remeasured at each reporting date, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Warrants that meet equity classification criteria (including advisor warrants) are recorded at their initial fair value and recognized as a component of additional paid-in capital.

Critical Accounting Policy: Convertible Preferred Shares and Complex Equity Instruments

In connection with the Business Combination and related arrangements, we issued Convertible Preferred Shares that are contingently convertible into ordinary shares upon the achievement of specified market-based and regulatory milestones; we also issued additional Convertible Preferred Shares to an advisor under similar milestone-based conditions, which are accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation- Stock Compensation. Determining whether these instruments are classified as equity or as liabilities requires significant judgment, including assessment of (i) whether settlement is fixed or may vary, (ii) the nature of the contingent features, and (iii) whether the instruments meet the scope exceptions in ASC 815 and the equity classification criteria in ASC 480/ASC 815-40. Classification conclusions affect where amounts are presented in the financial statements and whether subsequent remeasurement at fair value is required. Changes in facts and circumstances—such as the resolution of milestones—could require reclassification between equity and liabilities, with a corresponding impact on earnings.

Critical Accounting Policy: Business Combination Accounting and Recapitalization

We accounted for the October 9, 2025 de-SPAC transaction as a recapitalization, with Terra Innovatum Global Srl. identified as the accounting acquirer and GSR III not meeting the definition of a business under ASC 805. This conclusion required significant judgment and resulted in recognizing the net monetary assets of GSR III at historical carrying amounts with no recognition of goodwill or other intangible assets. Different judgments regarding the existence of a business, the accounting acquirer, or the nature of identifiable assets could have resulted in materially different accounting, including the recognition and measurement of intangible assets and goodwill.

Critical Accounting Policy: Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

We operate across multiple jurisdictions and transact in multiple currencies, including euro-denominated vendor agreements and U.S. dollar reporting. Determining functional currencies for our entities and measuring remeasurement/translation effects involve judgment and can affect the timing and classification of foreign-currency gains and losses in the statement of operations. We recognize transaction gains and losses arising from foreign-currency-denominated balances through earnings. Exchange-rate volatility can materially affect reported operating results, cash flows, and liquidity trends, particularly for engineering services and feasibility programs that are priced in currencies other than the functional currency.

Critical Accounting Estimate: Fair Value Measurements – Level 3 Instruments

We use option pricing model valuation techniques that rely on significant unobservable inputs (“Level 3”) to measure certain instruments at fair value or to allocate proceeds at initial recognition, including share-settled contingent liabilities and, at issuance, certain equity-linked instruments and warrants. Key inputs include expected volatility, discount rates, equity value, contractual terms, and the probability and timing of milestone achievement. Small changes in these inputs can produce material changes in fair value, impacting earnings (for liabilities) or the allocation of proceeds within equity (for non-remeasured instruments). We evaluate inputs each period with reference to market data, peer benchmarks, and updated operating facts and circumstances.

The fair value of these Level 3 instruments is most sensitive to assumptions related to expected volatility and the probability and timing of milestone achievement. A higher expected volatility or an increase in the probability of achieving performance or regulatory milestones would generally increase the fair value of these instruments, while lower volatility or delayed milestone achievement would reduce fair value. Because certain of these instruments are classified as liabilities and remeasured at each reporting date, reasonably possible changes in these assumptions could result in material volatility in our reported earnings.

For example, holding other assumptions constant, an increase in assumed volatility or milestone probability would have resulted in a higher fair value measurement and a corresponding reduction in net income, while the opposite would have resulted in lower fair value and higher reported earnings.

Critical Accounting Estimate: Fair Value of Warrants

The valuation of both equity-classified and liability-classified warrants involves significant estimation uncertainty. We use option pricing models that require us to make assumptions about key inputs, including expected volatility, risk-free interest rates, term to expiration, and the fair value of the underlying equity. These inputs are inherently subjective and difficult to predict, and even small changes in any of them can materially affect the resulting fair value. The estimation process is particularly sensitive to market conditions and company-specific developments. We continuously evaluate these assumptions, and changes in inputs or classification could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The fair value of our warrants is most sensitive to changes in expected volatility and the fair value of our ordinary shares. A higher assumed volatility or increase in share price would generally increase the fair value of the warrants, while decreases in these inputs would have the opposite effect. Because liability-classified warrants are remeasured through earnings, reasonably possible changes in these assumptions could materially affect our results of operations from period to period.

Critical Accounting Estimate: Share-settled Contingent Liability

We record share-settled contingent liabilities for arrangements in which a variable number of equity instruments are issued with contingent conversion outcomes based on the achievement of specified market-based or regulatory milestones. These instruments are classified as liabilities and measured at fair value because the timing and extent of settlement depend on the occurrence of future events that are not within our control.

Valuation of these instruments requires significant judgment, including assumptions related to expected equity volatility, discount rates, milestone probabilities, timing of achievement, and future share price outcomes. Fair value is generally estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, which incorporates multiple potential settlement scenarios and probability-weighted outcomes. Changes in these assumptions can materially impact fair value and may result in significant period-to-period volatility in earnings.

Because these contingent instruments remain outstanding until the underlying conditions are satisfied or expire, actual outcomes may differ from our estimates, resulting in potential variability in future reported results. During 2025, the resolution of certain milestones resulted in a significant reduction in the fair value of this liability, which materially increased net income. If future milestones are achieved earlier or later than expected, or if market conditions lead to significant changes in volatility or share price assumptions, the fair value of the remaining contingent instruments could change materially, resulting in corresponding gains or losses recognized in earnings.

Critical Accounting Estimate: PIPE Financing

We account for the PIPE Financing, which consists of Class A ordinary shares and accompanying Half-Warrants and Quarter-Warrants, at fair value on the issuance date in accordance with ASC 820. Because the PIPE units include multiple freestanding financial instruments with different economic characteristics, we allocate the proceeds received by first measuring the warrants at their fair value, with the remaining proceeds allocated to the Class A ordinary shares.

The accompanying warrants provide holders with the right to purchase Class A ordinary shares at fixed exercise prices of $12.00 per share for the Half-Warrants and $16.00 per share for the Quarter-Warrants, subject to standard anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, the warrants include issuer redemption features that permit us to redeem outstanding warrants for nominal consideration if our share price meets specified trading price thresholds for a defined period. These contractual terms significantly affect the fair value of the warrants.

The fair value of the PIPE warrants is estimated using valuation techniques that require significant judgment, including Monte Carlo simulation models, which incorporate assumptions related to expected share price volatility, risk-free interest rates, contractual term, redemption features, and simulated future share price paths. These assumptions are classified as Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy.

Changes in key valuation inputs, particularly assumptions related to volatility and modeled share price trajectories, can materially affect the estimated fair value of the warrants and the resulting allocation of proceeds between equity and liability-classified instruments. Such changes could have a significant impact on additional paid-in capital and earnings in the period of issuance or subsequent reporting periods. We evaluate the reasonableness of valuation assumptions each reporting period based on observable market data, comparable company volatility metrics, and prevailing trading conditions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as that term is defined in Item 303 of Regulation S-K) that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources.

Related Party Transactions

Refer to Note 4. “Related Party Transactions” of the Notes to our Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for a discussion of related party transactions.

Recent Accounting Standards and Pronouncements

Refer to Note 3. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to our Financial included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting standards and pronouncements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The full text of our audited consolidated financial statements begins on page F-1 of this report and is included herein by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of certain material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as further described below.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of our company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of our company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of our company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework (or “COSO Framework”). Based on its evaluation, management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025 due to the existence of four material weaknesses, described further below. A material weakness, as defined under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2, is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected. We describe the material weaknesses in the following section.

Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 308(b), this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.

(c) Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

We did not maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, based on the criteria established in the COSO Framework, which resulted in deficiencies in principles associated with the control environment and its ongoing evaluation by management. These control deficiencies constituted material weaknesses, either individually or in the aggregate, relating to:

The material weakness resulted in errors, which were identified and corrected during the audit. These material weaknesses created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not have been prevented or detected on a timely basis as of December 31, 2025.

Management has developed a plan to remediate the identified material weaknesses, and we expect to begin implementing these remediation efforts in 2026 and to include the following measures:

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except for the identification of the material weaknesses above, there were no changes during the quarter ended December 31, 2025, in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Directors and Executive Officers

The Board of Directors is currently composed of seven members, consisting of:

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the persons who serve as executive officers and Executive and Non-Executive Directors of Terra as of the date of this Annual Report.

Biographies of Executive Officers and Directors

Set forth below are brief accounts of the business experience during at least the past five years of each executive officer and Director of Terra.

Alessandro Petruzzi, Ph.D., is a Co-Founder of Terra Innovatum S.R.L. and has served as President since its inception. He is Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Terra and Executive Director since October 2025. He also founded Nuclear and Industrial Engineering, S.R.L. (NINE), a company that provides safety assessment services in the framework of licensing applications worldwide. He serves as Chair of the OECD/NEA Expert Group on Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics (EGTHM) and is an Industry Professor at McMaster University, Canada. He has managed international safety and licensing projects for nuclear facilities in Argentina, the UK, Finland, Brazil and Poland, including leading the safety accident analysis for Atucha-2 NPP for the Argentinean utility, the Hanikhivhi NPP for the Finnish utility and recently the independent safety analysis of the entire Final Safety Analysis Report of Westinghouse AP1000 for the Polish utility. He has contributed as an expert to IAEA safety review and training programs and is the scientific investigator for NINE on several IAEA research projects. He has co-authored numerous scientific publications and the IAEA SSG-2 guidance. He has also organized major conferences such as NURETH 15, BEPU2018, and BEPU2024. Alessandro earned his PhD in Nuclear and Industrial Safety from the “Leonardo da Vinci” Doctoral Engineering School in 2008, following over nine years with the Nuclear Research Group of San Piero a Grado (GRNSPG), University of Pisa.

Dr. Marco Cherubini is a Co-Founder of Terra Innovatum S.R.L., who has served as Chief Technology Officer and SOLO Product Director since December 2021. Prior to joining Terra, Dr. Cherubini was a Co-Founder and board member at Nuclear and Industrial Engineering S.R.L. (NINE), a leading engineering firm in nuclear safety, serving as Vice-President and Head of the Core Behavior Area, and supporting major projects in Australia, Argentina, Finland, Norway, and France, from July 2011. Dr. Cherubini has played a key role in emergency preparedness for nuclear-propelled vessels and in the licensing of advanced reactors globally. Dr. Cherubini holds an M.S. in Nuclear Engineering and Ph.D. Nuclear and Industrial Safety from the University of Pisa.

Dr. Cesare Frepoli has served as Co-Founder, Chief Operating Officer, and Director of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs at Terra since September 2021, and as Executive Director since October 2025. He has over 30 years of experience in nuclear engineering, specializing in safety analysis, regulatory strategy, and advanced simulation technologies. Dr. Frepoli serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of FPoliSolutions, a firm providing risk-informed safety analysis and regulatory support to nuclear and green energy sectors, from July 2013 to September 2021. Prior to that, Dr. Frepoli worked at Westinghouse Electric Company, a supplier of nuclear technology, where he served as an advisor and engineer from September 2001 to July 2013, receiving multiple George Westinghouse awards recognizing his leadership and innovation. Cesare holds a Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering from Penn State University and a Master’s from Politecnico di Milano.

Dr. Massimo Morichi has served as Partner, Chief Strategy Officer, and SOLO Safeguards Director at Terra, since April 2025, and as an Executive Director since October 2025. Dr. Massimo is also currently a member of the Board of CAEN SpA Group and a professor at Aix-Marseille University and lecturer at University of PISA and UNICAM. Between 2016 and 2025, he held executive management roles and served on the Board of CAEN SpA Group. Between 2005 and 2016, he held senior executive roles including EVP Director Global R&D and Innovation at AREVA Group, a French multination group specializing in nuclear power, VP R&D CTO at CANBERRA Industries (U.S.), and Group Leader for major site remediation project in Japan. Dr. Morichi has led the development of over 65 nuclear measurement solutions, advanced safeguards systems for the IAEA, and directed the EU MICADO project for nuclear waste characterization. He is lecturer at universities in France and Italy. He holds an M.S. and PhD in Nuclear Physics from the University “La Sapienza” of Rome, a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from IT IS Enrico Fermi ROMA, and is a Certified Radiation Protection Expert.

Katherine Williams has served as Executive Director and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Terra since March 2026. Previously, Ms. Williams served as a Non-Executive Director and Chairperson of the Board of Directors from October 2025 until March 2026. As of March 29, 2026, Ms. Williams was designated as Executive Director and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Company. Ms. Williams has yet to be officially appointed as Executive Director and CFO during the 2026 annual general meeting. Since April 2025, Ms. Williams has served as CFO of Solestiss LLC, an energy developer and consultancy specializing in the nuclear and renewable energy sectors. Prior to Solestiss, from February 2002 to May 2024, Ms. Williams served as CEO and CFO of Framatome Inc., a global nuclear engineering and technology company that designs, builds, maintains, and services nuclear steam supply systems (NSSS) and equipment for nuclear power plants. Ms. Williams holds a B.S. from the College of Charleston and her MBA from the University of Pittsburgh.

Rex S. Jackson has served as a Non-Executive Director of Terra since October 2025. From May 2018 until November 2023, Mr. Jackson served as CFO of ChargePoint Inc. (NYSE: CHPT), a publicly-traded provider of charging solutions for electric vehicles. Mr. Jackson previously served as CFO of Gigamon Inc. (GIMO), a developer of network and security visibility solutions, from October 2016 until April 2018 after the completion of the Company’s going private transaction, and as CFO of Rocket Fuel Inc. (FUEL), an advertising technology company, from March 2016 to October 2016. Mr. Jackson served on the board of directors of EMCORE Corporation (EMKR) from 2015 to 2024, and of Energous Corporation (WATT), a company that develops wireless charging technology, from 2014 until 2019. Mr. Jackson also served as CFO of JDS Uniphase Corporation (JDSU), a provider of network and service enablement solutions and optical products for telecommunications service providers, cable operators, and network equipment manufacturers, from January 2013 through September 2015, where he drove the separation of JDSU into two independent public companies in August 2015. Mr. Jackson joined JDSU in January 2011 as Senior Vice President, Business Services, with responsibility for corporate development, legal, corporate marketing and information technology. From 2007 to 2010, Mr. Jackson served as CFO of Symyx Technologies, Inc. (SMMX), a provider of informatics and automation products, where he led the Company’s acquisition of MDL Information Systems, Inc. and subsequent merger of equals with another public company. Mr. Jackson also previously served as acting CFO at Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS), a provider of electronic design automation software and services, and held executive positions with Avago Technologies Limited (now Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)), a provider of analog semiconductor devices, AdForce, Inc. (ADFC) and Read-Rite Corporation (RDRT). Mr. Jackson holds a B.A. from Duke University and earned his J.D. from Stanford University Law School. Mr. Jackson’s accounting and financial expertise, general business acumen, extensive knowledge of a range of technologies and significant executive leadership experience were the primary qualifications that the Board of Directors considered in concluding that he should serve as a director of Terra.

Michael W. Howard has been a Non-Executive Director of Terra since October 2025. As of March 29, 2026, Mr. Howard serves as Chairperson of the Board of Directors. From 1999 to 2020, Dr. Howard held several leadership positions within EPRI, a global organization headquartered in Palo Alto, California, with several offices across the U.S. and internationally. Dr. Howard led EPRI in developing technological innovations related to electricity production, delivery, and consumption, including advancements in nuclear power, renewable energy, energy storage, and electric vehicles. In 2010, the EPRI Board of Directors appointed Dr. Howard as President and CEO of EPRI, a role he held until his retirement at the end of 2020. He was then honored with the title of CEO Emeritus by the Board. From 1996 to 1999, Dr. Howard was the President and CEO of PEAC, a technology-driven power electronics company that offered power quality solutions to large industrial customers and electric utility companies, which was acquired by EPRI in 1999. In 1990, Dr. Howard co-founded Scientific Imaging Solutions, a technology company specializing in advanced image processing systems for automated microscopic material and biological image analysis, which merged with an affiliated firm in Pittsburgh in 1992. From 1992 to 1999, Dr. Howard joined a venture capital firm that provided equity and debt investment to early-stage tech companies while serving as an adjunct professor at the University of Tennessee, where he taught various master’s and Ph.D. courses in Industrial and Systems Engineering. Dr. Howard earned his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Tennessee, his M.S. in Business and Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, and his Ph.D. from the University of Tennessee’s College of Engineering, focusing his dissertation on advanced artificial intelligence. Dr. Howard also attended the Reactor Technology Course for Utility Executives co-sponsored by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). Dr. Howard is also a member of the Carnegie Mellon University Scott Institute advisory council and Chair Emeritus of the World Energy Council in London, England. Dr. Howard’s extensive experience in the energy sector, especially the electricity sector were the primary qualifications that the Board of Directors considered in concluding that he should serve as a director of Terra.

Peter Hastings has been a Non-Executive Director of Terra since October 2025. Mr. Hastings is also a Senior Fellow for the Nuclear Innovation Alliance, a Washington, DC-based, non-profit, non-partisan, think tank focused on catalyzing the next era of nuclear energy. He also consults with numerous nuclear energy clients through The Hastings Group, LLC, a management and regulatory advisory firm. From March 2018 to October 2025, Mr. Hastings was employed at Kairos Power LLC, a small modular reactor developer, where he served as Vice President of Regulatory, Quality, and Public Affairs, leading teams responsible for Kairos licensing and permitting activities, siting, reliability engineering, quality assurance, nuclear safeguards and security, internal and external communications and community engagement, and government relations Prior to joining Kairos, Mr. Hastings founded The Hastings Group and consulted with the Electric Power Research Institute, the Nuclear Energy Institute, the Nuclear Innovation Alliance, the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Company, and several advanced reactor developers on the regulatory framework for advanced reactors, the risk-informed “Licensing Modernization” project, source term development, and risk-informed emergency planning. He also held previous positions with Generation mPower, Duke Energy, and NuStart Energy Development. Mr. Hastings is a former member of several prominent nuclear energy industry institutes and councils, including the US Nuclear Industry Council and was Chairman of its Advanced Reactor Working Group, Chair of the Nuclear Energy Institute’s Advanced Reactor Regulatory Working Group, Vice Chair of the World Nuclear Association’s CORDEL Working Group and Chair of its Small Modular Reactor Task Force, Chair of the US High-Temperature Reactor Technology Working Group, and appointed member of the US Chamber of Commerce Civil Nuclear Trade Advisory Committee, as well as a member of numerous industry steering committees. Mr. Hastings earned his B.S. in nuclear engineering from NC State University and is a registered Professional Engineer in North and South Carolina. Mr. Hastings’ extensive experience in the nuclear energy sector was the primary qualification that the Board of Directors considered in concluding that he should serve as a director of Terra.

Family Relationships

Our Chief Business Officer, Giordano Morichi, is the son of our Chief Executive Officer, Massimo Morichi. Other than this, there are no other family relationships between or among any of the persons who will serve as directors or executive officers of Terra.

Dutch Corporate Governance Code

Since Terra qualifies as a listed Dutch public limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap), Terra is subject to the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (the “DCGC”). The DCGC contains both principles and best practice provisions on corporate governance that regulate relations between the board of directors and the general meeting and matters in respect of financial reporting, auditors, disclosure, compliance and enforcement standards. The DCGC is based on a “comply or explain” principle. Accordingly, Terra is required to disclose in its statutory board report, filed in the Netherlands, whether it complies with the provisions of the DCGC. If Terra does not comply with these provisions, Terra is required to give the reasons for such non-compliance.

Diversity and Director and Officer Qualifications

Terra has not formally established any specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by each of its directors. However, Terra generally evaluates the following qualities: educational background, diversity of professional experience, including whether the person is a current or was a former chief executive officer or chief financial officer of a public company or the head of a division of a prominent international organization, knowledge of Terra’s business, integrity, professional reputation, independence, wisdom, and ability to represent the best interests of Terra’s shareholders.

Furthermore, from the moment Terra qualifies as a so-called “large company” under Dutch law, it will be subject to the gender diversity target regime. Under this target regime Terra would have to set appropriate and ambitious targets — which should take the form of target ratios — to bring about a more balanced ratio of men to women with regard to its directors. A Dutch company qualifies as large, if it meets at least two of the following three criteria on at least two successive balance sheet dates: (a) the value of the total assets (based on its balance sheet and explanatory notes) on the basis of historical cost (acquisition and production cost) exceeds EUR 25 million, (b) the net turnover for the financial year exceeds EUR 50 million and (c) the average number of employees is 250 or more.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors has adopted policies regarding director qualification requirements (including a diversity policy) and the process for identifying and evaluating director candidates for adoption by the Board of Directors.

Board Regulations

The Board of Directors has adopted written rules and regulations dealing with, inter alia, its internal organization, the manner in which decisions are taken, any quorum requirements, the composition, duties and organization of its committees and any other matters concerning the Board of Directors, the executive directors, the non-executive directors and committees established by the Board of Directors.

Board Meetings and Committees

During our last fiscal year, each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of Board meetings and (ii) the total number of meetings of the committees on which the director served.

Independent Directors

In connection with the Business Combination, the Terra Ordinary Shares were listed on Nasdaq. Under the rules of Nasdaq, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, the rules of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Under the rules of Nasdaq, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Audit committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the rules of Nasdaq. Remuneration committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and the rules of Nasdaq. Due to the resignation of one of its independent Non-Executive Directors on November 7, 2025 for personal reasons and following the appointment of Ms. Williams as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Terra currently is not in compliance with the majority independent board requirement but will resolve the noncompliance through the addition of a new independent Non-Executive Director.

In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and under the rules of Nasdaq, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee: (a) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (b) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and under the rules of Nasdaq, the board of directors must affirmatively determine that the member of the remuneration committee is independent, including a consideration of all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship to the Company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a remuneration committee member, including, but not limited to:

The Board of Directors has undertaken a review of the independence of each Director and considered whether each Director of Terra has a material relationship with Terra that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. Rex Jackson, Michael Howard and Peter Hastings are considered “independent directors” as defined under the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq and the applicable rules of the Exchange Act.

In addition, certain provisions regarding the independency of non-executive directors apply based on the DCGC. The composition of the non-executive directors is such that the members are able to operate independently and critically vis-à-vis one another, the executive directors and any particular interests involved. The composition of the non-executive directors should be such that they are able to operate independently and critically vis-à-vis one another, the executive directors and any particular interests involved. In order to safeguard the independence of the non-executive directors, certain independency criteria apply, being in any case that the DCGC stipulates that a majority of the non-executive directors should be independent within the meaning of the DCGC and that for each shareholder or group of affiliated shareholders directly or indirectly holding more than 10 per cent of the shares in Terra, there is at most one executive director who can be considered to be affiliated with or representing them in conformity with the independence rules as included in the DCGC.

Furthermore, the Chairperson of the Board of Directors should not be a former executive director and should be independent within the meaning of the DCGC.

All of Terra’s Non-Executive Directors, qualify as independent within the meaning of the DCGC.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The standing committees of the Board of Directors consist of an audit committee (the “Audit Committee”), a remuneration committee (the “Remuneration Committee”), and a nominating and corporate governance committee (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”). The responsibilities and composition of each committee following the Business Combination are set forth below.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. Due to the resignation of one of its independent directors on November 7, 2025 for personal reasons, the Audit Committee currently consists of three Directors, each of whom is a Non-Executive Director of the Board of Directors and an independent director as well as “financially literate” as defined under the Nasdaq listing standards. The members of the Audit Committee are Rex Jackson (Chair), Michael Howard, and Peter Hastings.

The purpose of the Audit Committee is to prepare the audit committee report required by the SEC to be included in Terra’s proxy statement and to assist the Board of Directors to (A) oversee: (i) accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the financial statements of Terra; (ii) the integrity of Terra’s financial statements; (iii) Terra’s processes relating to risk management and the conduct and systems of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures; (iv) the qualifications, engagement, compensation, independence and performance of Terra’s independent auditor, and the auditor’s conduct of the annual audit of the Terra’s financial statements and any other services provided to Terra; and (v) the performance of Terra’s internal audit function, if any; and (B) produce the annual report of the Audit Committee required by the rules of the SEC.

The Board of Directors Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter for the Audit Committee which is available on Terra’s website.

Remuneration Committee

Our Remuneration Committee consists of at least two Directors, each of whom is a Non-Executive Director of the Board of Directors and an independent director under Nasdaq’s listing standards. The members of the Remuneration Committee are Michael Howard (Chair) and Peter Hastings.

The purpose of the Remuneration Committee is to assist the Board of Directors to (A) carry out the Board of Directors’ overall responsibility relating to organizational strength and executive compensation; (B) assist the Board of Directors in overseeing Terra’s employee compensation policies and practices, including (i) determining and approving the compensation of Terra’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Terra’s other executive officers, and (ii) reviewing and approving incentive compensation and equity compensation policies and programs, and exercising discretion in the administration of such programs; and (C) produce the annual report of the Remuneration Committee required by the rules of the SEC.

The Board of Directors operates pursuant to a written charter for the Remuneration Committee which is available on Terra’s website.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consist of two Directors, each of whom is a Non-Executive Director of the Board of Directors and an independent Director under Nasdaq’s listing standards. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on the Board of Directors. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Peter Hastings (Chair) and Michael Howard.

The purpose of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to assist the Board of Directors to (i) identify and screen individuals qualified to serve as directors and recommend to the Board of Directors candidates for nomination for election at the annual meeting of shareholders or to fill Board of Directors vacancies; (ii) develop, recommend to the Board of Directors and review Terra’s Corporate Governance Guidelines; (iii) coordinate and oversee self-evaluations of the Board of Directors, its committees, individual directors and management in the governance of Terra; (iv) review and approve, if appropriate, any related person transactions and other potential significant conflicts of interest; and (v) review on a regular basis the overall corporate governance of Terra and recommend improvements for approval by the Board of Directors where appropriate.

The Board of Directors operates pursuant to a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is available on Terra’s website.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct that applies to all of our Directors, officers and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Our code of business conduct is a “code of ethics,” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. Please note that our Internet website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. Terra will make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of its code of ethics on its website.

Insider Trading Policy

We have adopted an insider trading policy and procedures governing the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of its securities by directors, officers and employees, or the Company itself, that are reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and any listing standards applicable to Terra.

Communication with our Board of Directors

Our shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with our Board of Directors by sending written communication in an envelope addressed to “Board of Directors” in care of the Secretary, Via Matteo Trenta 117, Lucca, Italy 55100.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary Compensation Table. The following table sets forth certain compensation information for our Chief Executive Officer and each of the two most highly compensated officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer).

Amounts reflected in USD. For amounts paid in Euros, conversion was done at 1.13019 USD per Euro. The conversion ratio was based on the weighted average for fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.

Perquisites

Perquisites have not yet been established and therefore are not included in the figures above. The Remuneration Committee will determine any perquisites for the named executive officers based upon their services to be rendered. Such benefits to be paid by Terra may include company cars, medical insurance, accident insurance, tax preparation and financial counselling.

Equity Incentive Awards

Terra has adopted an Equity Incentive Plan under which several types of awards are available for issuance. Under the Equity Incentive Plan, NEOs receive 80% of their annual awards in Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) and 20% of their annual awards in Retention Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”). A PSU is a conditional right to receive Terra Ordinary Shares in the capital of Terra based on specific performance targets. For each vested PSU the holder is entitled to receive one Terra Ordinary Share. Each RSU represents the right to receive one Terra Ordinary Share.

Employment Agreements

The following outlines the material terms of our employment agreements with the NEOs, in addition to the compensation set forth above, pending approval by the Remuneration Committee:

Directorship Agreement with Mr. Alessandro Petruzzi

Effective as of October 10, 2025, Alessandro Petruzzi was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer and an executive director on our Board of Directors. Mr. Petruzzi’s directorship agreement does not constitute a contract of employment within the meaning of Section 7:610 et seq. of the Dutch Civil Code. Mr. Petruzzi’s directorship agreement provides for his fixed compensation, discretionary annual bonus opportunity, certain equity incentive awards (as detailed in the applicable individual award agreements), and certain benefits including a company car (or cash allowance in lieu), mobile phone and laptop, medical expense and accident insurance, D&O insurance, and tax preparation and financial counselling capped at €15,000 gross per year. Mr. Petruzzi’s office runs until after the close of the 2026 annual general meeting and is renewable year by year thereafter, with either party authorized to terminate upon six months’ written notice. The details of Mr. Petruzzi’s compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 are included above in the Summary Compensation Table.

Pursuant to the terms of his directorship agreement, in the event Mr. Petruzzi is terminated as a “Good Leaver” (i.e., the Company revokes or does not renew his appointment without “just cause of removal,” or Mr. Petruzzi resigns for “just cause of resignation,” or in the event of death or severe disability, as such terms are defined in his directorship agreement), Mr. Petruzzi will, subject to his execution of a settlement and release agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”), be entitled to (i) a termination indemnity equal to one year of his fixed compensation plus a discretionary bonus calculated at 100% of target; (ii) a pro-rated discretionary bonus for the year of termination, subject to achievement of applicable performance criteria; (iii) continued medical expense insurance coverage for up to 18 months; (iv) continued vesting or full acceleration of any retention share units awarded under any equity plan, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement; and (v) vesting of any Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) for the months of actual service during the year of termination (subject to achievement of performance targets) or full acceleration, in each case in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement. In the event of termination as a “Bad Leaver” (as defined in his directorship agreement), Mr. Petruzzi would be entitled only to his fixed compensation accrued through the date of termination, without any right to receive further amounts.

In the event Mr. Petruzzi is terminated by the Company without “just cause of removal” or resigns for “just cause of resignation,” in each case in connection with a “change in control” (as defined in his directorship agreement), then in lieu of the foregoing Good Leaver severance and subject to his execution of a Settlement Agreement, Mr. Petruzzi would be entitled to (i) a lump sum equal to 18 months of his fixed compensation plus his target discretionary bonus calculated at 100% of target; (ii) a pro-rated discretionary bonus for the year of termination, subject to achievement of applicable performance criteria; (iii) continued medical, dental and vision coverage for up to 18 months; (iv) reimbursement of outplacement services expenses incurred in the 12 months following termination, up to a gross amount of €25,000; (v) continued vesting or full acceleration of any retention share units, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement; and (vi) vesting or full acceleration of any PSUs, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement.

Directorship Agreement with Mr. Cesare Frepoli

Effective as of October 10, 2025, Cesare Frepoli was appointed as our Chief Operating Officer and an executive director on our Board of Directors. Mr. Frepoli’s directorship agreement does not constitute a contract of employment within the meaning of Section 7:610 et seq. of the Dutch Civil Code. His directorship agreement provides for his fixed compensation, a discretionary annual bonus opportunity, certain equity incentive awards (as detailed in the applicable individual award agreements), and certain benefits including a company car (or cash allowance in lieu), mobile phone and laptop, medical expense and accident insurance, D&O insurance, and tax preparation and financial counselling capped at €15,000 gross per year. Mr. Frepoli’s office runs until after the close of the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders and is renewable year by year thereafter, with either party authorized to terminate upon six months’ written notice. The details of Mr. Frepoli’s compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 are included above in the Summary Compensation Table.

Pursuant to the terms of his directorship agreement, in the event Mr. Frepoli is terminated as a “Good Leaver” (i.e., the Company revokes or does not renew his appointment without “just cause of removal,” or Mr. Frepoli resigns for “just cause of resignation,” or in the event of death or severe disability, as such terms are defined in his directorship agreement), Mr. Frepoli will, subject to his execution of a Settlement Agreement, be entitled to (i) a termination indemnity equal to one year of his fixed compensation plus his discretionary bonus calculated at 100% of target; (ii) a pro-rated discretionary bonus for the year of termination, subject to achievement of applicable performance criteria; (iii) continued medical expense insurance coverage for up to 18 months; (iv) continued vesting or full acceleration of any retention share units awarded under any equity plan, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement; and (v) vesting of any PSUs for the months of actual service during the year of termination (subject to achievement of performance targets) or full acceleration, in each case in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement. In the event of termination as a “Bad Leaver” (as defined in his directorship agreement), Mr. Frepoli would be entitled only to his fixed compensation accrued through the date of termination, without any right to receive further amounts.

In the event Mr. Frepoli is terminated by the Company without “just cause of removal” or resigns for “just cause of resignation,” in each case in connection with a “change in control” (as defined in his directorship agreement), then in lieu of the foregoing Good Leaver severance and subject to his execution of a Settlement Agreement, Mr. Frepoli would be entitled to (i) a lump sum equal to 18 months of his fixed compensation plus his target discretionary bonus calculated at 100% of target; (ii) a pro-rated discretionary bonus for the year of termination, subject to achievement of applicable performance criteria; (iii) continued medical, dental and vision coverage for up to 18 months; (iv) reimbursement of outplacement services expenses incurred in the 12 months following termination, up to a gross amount of €25,000; (v) continued vesting or full acceleration of any retention share units, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement; and (vi) vesting or full acceleration of any PSUs, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement.

Annual Bonus

Pursuant to our annual bonus program, annual bonuses for our named executive officers will be between 50% and 250% of base salary if annual performance goals are achieved, which may include company performance measures and individual goals that will be determined in the first quarter of every fiscal year. The annual bonus may be paid in cash, PSUs or a combination of cash and PSUs. If paid solely in cash only, the annual bonus will be between 50% and 100% of the base salary. If settled in part or in full in PSUs, the annual bonus will be between 100% and 250% of the base salary. The NEOs are allowed to determine the makeup of the annual bonus. The Remuneration Committee may increase the short-term incentive payable for any given year in case of exceptional achievements.

Terra Board of Director Compensation

Katherine Williams Services Agreement

Effective as of October 10, 2025, Katherine Williams was appointed as an independent Non-Executive Director and Chairperson of our Board of Directors. The appointment was for a fixed period of one year ending immediately after the close of the first annual general meeting of the Company held in the year after the appointment, subject to reappointment for a maximum of two subsequent periods. Ms. Williams’ service agreement provides for a fixed fee of $120,000 gross per annum (as corrected by an addendum dated December 2025, which amended the original fee of $80,000 to reflect her role as Chairperson of our Board of Directors), an additional annual fee for service on committees of the Board as set out in the Company’s Remuneration Policy, and any equity awards duly approved and granted by the Company or the Group Companies. Ms. Williams served as a member of the audit committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee. The Company maintains adequate directors’ and officers’ liability insurance as per market standards.

Pursuant to the terms of her service agreement, the Company may terminate the service agreement with immediate effect, without any type of fee or compensation, in the event that any of Ms. Williams’ actions in her capacity as Non-Executive Director qualifies as manifestly improper management as stipulated in Section 2:9 of the Dutch Civil Code, or if she acts in violation of one of the obligations of the service agreement and such breach is not remedied within 15 days after notification. Ms. Williams is authorized to terminate the service agreement prematurely in writing, subject to a notice period of three months. Upon termination, Ms. Williams shall have no entitlement to any compensation or remuneration of any kind other than accrued but unpaid compensation through the end date of the service agreement.

On March 29, 2026, Ms. Williams stepped down from the Company’s Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as the Chairperson of the Board of Directors and was designated as Executive Director and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

Rex Jackson Services Agreement

Effective as of October 10, 2025, Rex S. Jackson was appointed as an independent Non-Executive Director on our Board of Directors. Mr. Jackson’s service agreement is based on a contract for services (overeenkomst van opdracht) within the meaning of Section 7:400 of the Dutch Civil Code and does not constitute a contract of employment. The appointment is for a fixed period of one year ending immediately after the close of the first annual general meeting of the Company held in the year after the appointment, subject to reappointment for a maximum of two subsequent periods. Mr. Jackson’s service agreement provides for a fixed fee of $80,000 gross per annum, an additional annual fee for service on committees of our board as set out in the Company’s Remuneration Policy, and any equity awards duly approved and granted by the Company or the Group Companies. Mr. Jackson serves as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee. The Company maintains adequate directors’ and officers’ liability insurance as per market standards.

Pursuant to the terms of his service agreement, the Company may terminate the service agreement with immediate effect, without any type of fee or compensation, in the event that any of Mr. Jackson’s actions in his capacity as Non-Executive Director qualifies as manifestly improper management as stipulated in Section 2:9 of the Dutch Civil Code, or if he acts in violation of one of the obligations of the service agreement and such breach is not remedied within 15 days after notification. Mr. Jackson is authorized to terminate the service agreement prematurely in writing, subject to a notice period of three months. Upon termination, Mr. Jackson shall have no entitlement to any compensation or remuneration of any kind other than accrued but unpaid compensation through the end date of the service agreement.

Peter Hastings Services Agreement

Effective as of October 10, 2025, Peter Hastings was appointed as an independent Non-Executive Director on our Board of Directors. Mr. Hastings’s service agreement is based on a contract for services (overeenkomst van opdracht) within the meaning of Section 7:400 of the Dutch Civil Code and does not constitute a contract of employment. The appointment is for a fixed period of one year ending immediately after the close of the first annual general meeting of the Company held in the year after the appointment, subject to reappointment for a maximum of two subsequent periods. Mr. Hastings’s service agreement provides for a fixed fee of $80,000 gross per annum, an additional annual fee for service on committees of the board as set out in the Company’s Remuneration Policy, and any equity awards duly approved and granted by the Company or the Group Companies. Mr. Hastings serves as a member of the Remuneration Committee and as the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Company maintains adequate directors’ and officers’ liability insurance as per market standards.

Pursuant to the terms of his service agreement, the Company may terminate the service agreement with immediate effect, without any type of fee or compensation, in the event that any of Mr. Hastings’s actions in his capacity as Non-Executive Director qualifies as manifestly improper management as stipulated in Section 2:9 of the Dutch Civil Code, or if he acts in violation of one of the obligations of the service agreement and such breach is not remedied within 15 days after notification. Mr. Hastings is authorized to terminate the service agreement prematurely in writing, subject to a notice period of three months. Upon termination, Mr. Hastings shall have no entitlement to any compensation or remuneration of any kind other than accrued but unpaid compensation through the end date of the service agreement.

Michael W. Howard (Chairperson) Services Agreement

Effective as of October 10, 2025, M.W. Howard was appointed as an independent Non-Executive Director on our Board of Directors. Mr. Howard’s service agreement is based on a contract for services (overeenkomst van opdracht) within the meaning of Section 7:400 of the Dutch Civil Code and does not constitute a contract of employment. The appointment is for a fixed period of one year ending immediately after the close of the first annual general meeting of the Company held in the year after the appointment, subject to reappointment for a maximum of two subsequent periods. Mr. Howard’s service agreement provides for a fixed fee of $80,000 gross per annum, an additional annual fee for service on committees of the board as set out in the Company’s Remuneration Policy, and any equity awards duly approved and granted by the Company or the Group Companies. Mr. Howard serves as a member of the audit committee, the Chairperson of the remuneration committee, and a member of the nominating and corporate governance committee. The Company maintains adequate directors’ and officers’ liability insurance as per market standards.

Pursuant to the terms of his service agreement, the Company may terminate the service agreement with immediate effect, without any type of fee or compensation, in the event that any of Mr. Howard’s actions in his capacity as Non-Executive Director qualifies as manifestly improper management as stipulated in Section 2:9 of the Dutch Civil Code, or if he acts in violation of one of the obligations of the service agreement and such breach is not remedied within 15 days after notification. Mr. Howard is authorized to terminate the service agreement prematurely in writing, subject to a notice period of three months. Upon termination, Mr. Howard shall have no entitlement to any compensation or remuneration of any kind other than accrued but unpaid compensation through the end date of the service agreement.

Beginning March 29, 2026, Mr. Howard was appointed Chairperson of the Board of Directors.

Massimo Morichi Directorship Agreement

Effective as of October 10, 2025, Massimo Morichi was appointed as our Chief Strategy Officer and an Executive Director on our Board of Directors. Mr. Morichi’s directorship agreement does not constitute a contract of employment within the meaning of Section 7:610 et seq. of the Dutch Civil Code. His directorship agreement provides for his fixed compensation, a discretionary annual bonus opportunity, certain equity incentive awards (as detailed in individual award agreements), and certain benefits including a company car (or cash allowance in lieu), mobile phone and laptop, medical expense and accident insurance, D&O insurance, and tax preparation and financial counselling capped at €15,000 gross per year. Mr. Morichi’s office runs until after the close of the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders and is renewable year by year thereafter, with either party authorized to terminate upon six months’ written notice. The details of Mr. Morichi’s compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 are included above in the Summary Compensation Table.

Pursuant to the terms of his directorship agreement, in the event Mr. Morichi is terminated as a “Good Leaver” (i.e., the Company revokes or does not renew his appointment without “just cause of removal,” or Mr. Morichi resigns for “just cause of resignation,” or in the event of death or severe disability, as such terms are defined in his directorship agreement), Mr. Morichi will, subject to his execution of a Settlement Agreement, be entitled to (i) a termination indemnity equal to one year of his fixed compensation plus his discretionary bonus calculated at 100% of target; (ii) a pro-rated discretionary bonus for the year of termination, subject to achievement of applicable performance criteria; (iii) continued medical expense insurance coverage for up to 18 months; (iv) continued vesting or full acceleration of any retention share units awarded under any equity plan, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement; and (v) vesting of any PSUs for the months of actual service during the year of termination (subject to achievement of performance targets) or full acceleration, in each case in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement. In the event of termination as a “Bad Leaver” (as defined in his directorship agreement), Mr. Morichi would be entitled only to his fixed compensation accrued through the date of termination, without any right to receive further amounts.

In the event Mr. Morichi is terminated by the Company without “just cause of removal” or resigns for “just cause of resignation,” in each case in connection with a “change in control” (as defined in his directorship agreement), then in lieu of the foregoing Good Leaver severance and subject to his execution of a Settlement Agreement, Mr. Morichi would be entitled to (i) a lump sum equal to 18 months of his fixed compensation plus his target discretionary bonus calculated at 100% of target; (ii) a pro-rated MBO bonus for the year of termination, subject to achievement of applicable performance criteria; (iii) continued medical, dental and vision coverage for up to 18 months; (iv) reimbursement of outplacement services expenses incurred in the 12 months following termination, up to a gross amount of €25,000; (v) continued vesting or full acceleration of any retention share units, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement; and (vi) vesting or full acceleration of any PSUs, in accordance with the applicable individual award agreement.

Each of the foregoing severance payments and benefits is subject to Mr. Morichi’s execution of a Settlement Agreement providing for, among other things, full waivers of any right, claim or action against the Company, its Group companies and their investors, as well as his continued compliance with certain confidentiality, intellectual property, non-disparagement and non-solicitation obligations set forth in his directorship agreement. Mr. Morichi is also subject to a 12-month post-termination non-solicitation restriction with respect to the Company’s and the Group’s employees, directors, collaborators, suppliers and clients.

Guillaume Moyen

The Company did not enter into any services agreements with Guillaume Moyen. Mr. Moyen resigned as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director on March 28, 2026.

Martha Crawford

The Company did not enter into any services agreements with Ms. Crawford. Ms. Crawford resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors on November 7, 2025.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2025 regarding the beneficial ownership of ordinary shares by:

Percentage of beneficial ownership of ordinary shares is based on 110,500,908 ordinary shares outstanding as of December 31, 2025.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to, or the power to receive the economic benefit of ownership of, the securities. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days are included, including through the exercise of any option or other right or the conversion of any other security. However, these shares are not included in the computation of the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each shareholder listed below is Via Matteo Trenta 117 Lucca, Italy 55100.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of shares beneficially owned by them.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth certain information about the securities authorized for issuance under our incentive plans as of December 31, 2025:

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, Terra Innovatum earned other income of $0 and $129,170, respectively, for engineering consulting services provided to related parties. The consulting services are unrelated to the core business of Terra Innovatum and are included in the statement of operations under other income — related parties.

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, Terra Innovatum entered into interest-free loan agreements with its legacy quotaholders. The total loan amounts of $73,635 and $216,212 were provided in cash installments by January 15, 2025. Both loans were repaid in full upon the Closing of the Business Combination.

On April 1, 2025, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Nine Nuclear and Industrial Engineering S.R.L. (“Nine”). The term of the lease runs for 24 months until March 31, 2027; each party may withdraw from the lease agreement at any time before the expiration date. The rent is $12,316 (€11,400 Euros) per annum in addition to a de minimis monthly fee as a flat-rate reimbursement for utilities and cleaning costs (the “Lease Fee”). The Lease Fee will be updated annually by 75% of the variation in the official consumer price indices for worker and employee families as determined by the Italian Statistics Day (“ISTAT”) in the previous year and subsequently year by year, with the first update taking effect on April 1, 2026. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company paid $9,663 in rent.

On July 11, 2025, the Company entered into an engineering services agreement with Nine, a related party, to support the design of the SOLO project. Per the terms of the agreement, Nine committed to deliver certain technical services to the Company with a total value of $214,508 (€183,560) plus value added tax (“VAT”). The Company paid an initial one-time payment of $131,410 in September 2025.

On July 23, 2025, the Company entered into an engineering services agreement with FPoliSolutions LLC (“FPoliSolutions”), a related party. As per the terms of the agreement, FPoliSolutions will provide support for the development of the SOLO Micro Modular Reactor including technical assistance in safety analysis, hazard modeling, radiological consequence evaluation, risk-informed safety assessments, and techno-economic analysis for $89,687 with work completed during September 2025.

On October 30, 2025, the Company entered into an amendment to its existing engineering services agreement with FPoliSolutions. The amendment extends the scope of work through December 31, 2025 and adds one full-time engineer on a fixed-price basis of $106,600.

Policies and Procedures for Related Persons Transactions

The Company has adopted a policy that requires the review and approval of any transaction, arrangement or relationship where the Company was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any “Related Person” (generally defined as any director (or director nominee) or executive officer of the Company, beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s shares, any immediate family member of the foregoing and any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or principal or in which that person has a 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest) had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Before entering any such transaction, arrangement or relationship, the Chief Financial Officer must be notified of the facts and circumstances of the proposed transaction, arrangement or relationship. If the Chief Financial Officer determines that a transaction, arrangement or relationship is indeed a related party transaction, then such transaction will be sent to the Audit Committee (or the Chairperson of such committee) for their review and approval. Only those transactions that are in the best interests of the Company shall be approved.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

Change in Independent Registered Public Accountants

On January 15, 2026, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company dismissed MaloneBailey, LLP (“MaloneBailey”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. MaloneBailey had served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since April 29, 2025. MaloneBailey had served as the independent auditor for Terra Innovatum S.R.L, an Italian limited liability company, the Company’s wholly-owned Subsidiary, since 2025. MaloneBailey had served as the independent auditor for Xit Corp. (formerly GSR III Acquisition Corp.), a Cayman Islands exempted company, the Company’s wholly-owned Subsidiary, since 2024.

MaloneBailey’s audit report on the Company’s financial statements as of April 29, 2025 and for the period beginning April 29, 2025 (inception) and ended April 29, 2025 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the report included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

During the period beginning April 29, 2025 (inception) and ended April 29, 2025 and the subsequent interim period through January 15, 2026: (1) there were no “disagreements” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) with MaloneBailey on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of MaloneBailey, would have caused MaloneBailey to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in connection with its reports on the financial statements for such periods and (2) there were no “reportable events” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K), except for the material weaknesses related to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as described elsewhere in this Annual Report.

We previously reported the change in accounting firms on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 21, 2026. We provided MaloneBailey with a copy of the above disclosures and requested that MaloneBailey furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the foregoing statements. A copy of MaloneBailey’s letter dated January 21, 2026 was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2026.

On January 15, 2026, the Audit Committee appointed KPMG Accountants N.V. (“KPMG”) as its new independent registered public accounting firm. The Company has authorized MaloneBailey to respond fully to the inquiries of the successor independent registered public accounting firm.

During the two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through January 15, 2026, the Company did not consult with KPMG with respect to (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the Company that KPMG concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy and procedures for audit, audit-related and tax services that can be performed by the independent auditors without specific authorization from the Audit Committee subject to certain restrictions. The policy sets out the specific services pre-approved by the Audit Committee and the applicable limitations, while ensuring the independence of the independent auditors to audit our financial statements is not impaired. The pre-approval policy does not include a delegation to management of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities under the Exchange Act. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent auditors.

Service Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following tables summarize approximate aggregate fees billed to us by our former and current independent registered public accounting firms for the period from January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025:

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a) List of Documents Filed as a Part of This Report:

The Company’s financial statements, as indicated by the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth below, begin on page F-1. Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(2) Index to Financial Statement Schedules:

All schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto, or because it is not required.

(3) Index to Exhibits:

See exhibits listed under Part (b) below.

(b) Exhibits: