UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| N/A | ||||
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
||
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation to the registrant under any of the following provisions:
| Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) | |
| Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) | |
| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) | |
| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of exchange on which registered | ||
| The Stock Market LLC | ||||
| The Stock Market LLC | ||||
| The Stock Market LLC |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
| Item 7.01 | Regulation FD Disclosure |
On January 7, 2026, Barron’s published an article titled “Trump Wants Greenland. Why He May Be Overestimating Its Value.” The article discussed strategic and resource considerations in Greenland, and featured a quote from Mr. Robert Price of the March GL Company (“March GL”). The article can be accessed by subscription at https://www.barrons.com/articles/greenland-trump-minerals-defense-denmark-e08b926f. A copy of the article is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated by reference into this Item 7.01.
On January 12, 2026, Yahoo Finance published an article titled “Greenland looks like Trump’s next geopolitical priority. It could also be the oil industry’s next great hope.” The article featured Mr. Robert Price of March GL discussing Greenland energy development and related industry implications. The article can be accessed at https://finance.yahoo.com/news/greenland-looks-like-trumps-next-geopolitical-priority-it-could-also-be-the-oil-industrys-next-great-hope-110029932.html. A copy of the article is furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated by reference into this Item 7.01.
Also on January 12, 2026, Yahoo Finance aired a video segment titled “Trump’s Greenland push: Inside look.” The video featured Mr. Jake Conley of Yahoo Finance discussing the resource potential of Greenland and the business combination involving March GL, Pelican Acquisition Corporation (“Pelican”), Greenland Exploration Limited (“Greenland”) and Pelican Holdco, Inc. (“PubCo”) (the “Business Combination”). The video can be accessed at https://finance.yahoo.com/video/trump-greenland-push-inside-look-195009504.html.
The information in this Item 7.01 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Additional Information About the Business Combination and Where to Find It
In connection with the Business Combination, Pelican filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a registration statement on Form S-4 (the “Registration Statement”), which includes a preliminary proxy statement/prospectus of Pelican and after the Registration Statement is declared effective, Pelican will mail the definitive proxy statement/prospectus relating to the Business Combination to Pelican’s shareholders as of the respective record dates to be established for voting on the Business Combination. The Registration Statement, including the proxy statement/prospectus contained therein, contains important information about the Business Combination and the other matters to be voted upon at a meeting of the Pelican shareholders (the “Pelican Shareholder Meeting”). This Current Report on Form 8-K does not contain all the information that should be considered concerning the Business Combination and other matters and is not intended to provide a basis for any investment decision or any other decision in respect of such matters. Pelican, Greenland, March GL, or PubCo may also file other documents with the SEC regarding the Business Combination. Pelican’s shareholders and other interested persons are advised to read, when available, the Registration Statement, including the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus contained therein, the amendments thereto and the definitive proxy statement/prospectus and other documents filed in connection with the Business Combination, as these materials will contain important information about Pelican, Greenland, March GL, PubCo, and the Business Combination.
Pelican’s shareholders and other interested persons will be able to obtain copies of the Registration Statement, including the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus contained therein, the definitive proxy statement/prospectus and other documents filed or that will be filed with the SEC, free of charge, by Pelican, Greenland, March GL, and PubCo through the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Participants in the Solicitation
Pelican, Greenland, March GL, PubCo, and their respective directors and officers may be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies of Pelican shareholders in connection with the Business Combination. More detailed information regarding the directors and officers of Pelican, and a description of their interests in Pelican is contained in Pelican’s filings with the SEC, including its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended October 31, 2025, which was filed with the SEC on December 19, 2025, July 31, 2025, which was filed with the SEC on September 15, 2025, April 30, 2025, which was filed with the SEC on June 27, 2025, and the initial business combination offering filed on Form S-1, and effective as of May 22, 2025, which are available free of charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Information regarding the persons who may, under the SEC rules, be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies of Pelican’s shareholders and other interested persons in connection with the Business Combination and other matters to be voted upon at the Pelican Shareholders Meeting will be set forth in the Registration Statement for the Business Combination when available.
1
Forward-Looking Statements
This Current Report on Form 8-K includes certain statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “would,” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements about Pelican, Greenland, and March GL’s ability to effectuate the Business Combination discussed in this document; the benefits of the Business Combination; the future financial performance of PubCo (defined as the Greenland Energy Company, which will be the go-forward public company following the completion of the Business Combination) following the contemplated transactions; changes in the parties’ strategy; future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management. These forward-looking statements are based on information available as of the date of this document, and current expectations, forecasts and assumptions, and involve a number of judgments, risks, and uncertainties. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing Pelican’s, Greenland’s, March GL’s, or PubCo’s views as of any subsequent date, and none of Pelican, Greenland, March GL, and PubCo undertakes any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they were made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. Neither Pelican nor PubCo gives any assurance that either Pelican or PubCo will achieve its business expectations. Therefore, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. As a result of a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties, PubCo’s actual result or performance may be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Some factors that could cause actual results to differ include: (i) the timing to complete the Business Combination by Pelican’s business combination deadline, including after approval of applicable extensions and the potential failure to obtain such extension(s) of the business combination by the deadline if sought by Pelican; (ii) the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the definitive agreements relating to the Business Combination, (iii) the outcome of any legal, regulatory, or governmental proceedings that may be instituted against Pelican, Greenland, March GL, or PubCo or any investigation or inquiry following announcement of the Business Combination, including in connection with the Business Combination; (iv) the inability to complete the Business Combination due to the failure to obtain approval of Pelican’s shareholders or other interested persons; (v) Greenland, March GL, and PubCo’s success in retaining or recruiting, or changes required in its officers, key employees or directors, following the Business Combination; (vi) the ability of the parties to obtain the listing of the PubCo’s common stock on a national securities exchange upon the date of closing of the Business Combination; (vii) the risk that the Business Combination disrupts current plans and operations of Greenland or March GL; (viii) the ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination; (ix) the unexpected costs related to the Business Combination; (x) the amount of redemptions by the Pelican public shareholders being greater than expected; (xi) the management and board composition of PubCo following the Business Combination; (xii) limited liquidity and trading of PubCo’s securities following completion of the Business Combination; (xiii) changes in domestic and foreign business, market, financial, political, and legal conditions, including March GL’s expectations of receiving extensions on applicable licenses, (xiv) the possibility that Pelican, Greenland, or March GL may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors; (xv) operational risks; (xvi) litigation and regulatory enforcement risks, including the diversion of management time and attention and the additional costs and demands on Pelican, Greenland, or March GL’s resources; (xvii) the risk that the consummation of the Business Combination is substantially delayed or does not occur; and (xviii) other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in the Registration Statement, including those under “Risk Factors” therein, and in other filings of Pelican with the SEC.
No Offer or Solicitation
This Current Report on Form 8-K relates to a Business Combination by and among Pelican, Greenland, PubCo, and March GL. This document does not constitute a solicitation of a proxy, consent or authorization with respect to any securities or in respect of the Business Combination. This document does not constitute an offer to sell or exchange, or the solicitation of an offer to buy or exchange, any securities, nor shall there by any offer, sale or exchange of securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, sale or exchange would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offering of securities will be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act or an exemption therein.
2
| Item 9.01 | Financial Statements and Exhibits |
| Exhibit No. | Description | |
| 99.1 | Barron’s article published on January 7, 2026, titled “Trump Wants Greenland. Why He May Be Overestimating Its Value.” | |
| 99.2 | Yahoo Finance article published on January 12, 2026, titled “Greenland looks like Trump’s next geopolitical priority. It could also be the oil industry’s next great hope.” | |
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document). |
3
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| PELICAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION | ||
| Dated: January 12, 2026 | By: | /s/ Robert Labbé |
| Name: | Robert Labbé | |
| Chief Executive Officer | ||
4
Exhibit 99.1


January 7, 2026
Trump Wants Greenland. Why He May Be Overestimating Its Value.

Key Points
About This Summary
| ● | The U.S. wants to acquire Greenland for strategic Arctic control and mineral resources, but it already has capabilities in the territory, which is part of Denmark. |
| ● | Greenland possesses significant rare earth element deposits and an estimated 13 billion barrels of oil, but extraction of those resources would be challenging. |
| ● | Denmark’s national bank reported Greenland faces a slowing economy, skilled worker shortages, and rising healthcare costs leading to a 2025 deficit. |
It’s no secret that the U.S. wants to make Greenland its own. But while there are many reasons driving President Donald Trump’s effort to procure the large, sparsely-populated Arctic island, some experts think the benefits of doing so may be exaggerated.
“Everything that the United States could possibly want from Greenland it already has,” says Robert Neil Huebert, a political science professor at the University of Calgary and Director of its Centre for Military, Security and Strategic Studies.
Located northeast of Canada at the junction of the North Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean, Greenland is ideally positioned to monitor submarines entering the Atlantic, detect long-range ballistic missiles, and serve as a base for satellite operations. “It is a strategically exposed island in the Arctic—an area that sees increased activity from Russia and China,” Justina Budginaite-Froehly, a fellow at the non-partisan Atlantic Council think tank, told Barron’s.
But the U.S. already has all those monitoring capabilities with its current arrangement. In addition to its Pituffik Space Base there, the U.S. has secured various treaties giving it broad access to the 836,000-square mile island, which happens to be owned by Denmark.
The Trump administration views annexing Greenland as giving the U.S. “more control over the Arctic region and ensuring that China and Russia and our adversaries cannot continue their aggression in this very important and strategic region,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Wednesday afternoon.
But acquiring Greenland could both increase tensions with Europe—Denmark has said the territory isn’t for sale and a takeover would violate the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s collective security guarantee—while emboldening Russia and China to make similar territorial claims in Europe and Asia.
The U.S. also is interested in Greenland to extract minerals from there, but those benefits may be overstated, too.
Greenland has some of the largest rare earth element (REE) deposits in the world by weight, notes Kathryn Goodenough, principal geologist at the British Geological Survey. These include unusual ones such as the gemstone eudialyte and steenstrupine, which contains other rare earths used in high-tech devices. However, they are also lower grade than many such ores mined elsewhere across the globe, Goodenough notes.
Mining those reserves is particularly tough. “They are very complex ores with highly unusual mineralogy, and some of them have relatively high contents of the radioactive elements uranium and thorium,” Goodenough notes. “As yet, no company has successfully opened a REE mine in the region, due to a combination of geological, environmental, engineering, economic and social acceptance challenges.”
2
There’s also oil in Greenland, as much as 13 billion barrels according to a recent estimate from advisory firm Sproule ERCE, but so far companies have been unable to access it.
The territory banned new oil drilling there in 2021, largely over environmental concerns. Licenses granted before the moratorium have opened up the possibility of a new revenue source that could help Greenland become financially independent from Denmark, which currently subsidizes the semiautonomous territory.
Greenland could use an influx of cash. It faces a slowing economy and modest growth, according to a Tuesday report from Denmark’s national bank. A shortage of skilled workers and rising healthcare costs amid an aging population have contributed to an expected deficit in 2025. Healthcare is free in Greenland, paid for by the government.
“Greenland offers a density of critical natural resources that is virtually unmatched,” says Robert Price, CEO of the Texas-based oil-drilling company March GL, which is looking to extract oil from Greenland’s Jameson Land basin. (March GL will become Greenland Energy Company following its planned merger with Pelican Acquisition Corp.) Greenland would get a cut of any profits from oil that potentially gets extracted.
Such enthusiasm is helping to propel the accelerated timeline for working out a deal with Denmark. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Wednesday that he is meeting with Denmark next week to talk about Greenland.
Diplomacy is always the “first option,” Leavitt said Wednesday, after floating the prospect of military action on Tuesday.
“I see military involvement as rather unlikely,” says the Atlantic Council’s Budginaite-Froehly. “More feasible could be behind-the-scenes pressure on Denmark and Europe, potentially in combination with the ongoing Ukraine peace negotiations.”
Talks could be helped along by the prospect of losing U.S. business if it fails to cooperate. More than 20% of Danish exports go to the U.S., including drugs from pharmaceutical firm Novo Nordisk, Danske Bank economists noted on Wednesday.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/greenland-trump-minerals-defense-denmark-e08b926f
3
Exhibit 99.2
Greenland looks like Trump’s next geopolitical priority. It could also be the oil industry’s next great hope.
TASIILAQ, GREENLAND — Oil executives looking for the next massive source of petroleum have turned toward the Arctic for decades. Studies by the US government suggest the area above the Arctic Circle could hold as many as 90 billion barrels of oil and nearly 1,700 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
The oil alone would be enough to sustain the entirety of global demand for nearly three years if all other drilling worldwide were to cease tomorrow.
At the center of these ambitions is Greenland, where some of the harshest conditions on Earth protect stores that have drawn in prospectors looking for the chance at another discovery the size of Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay.
A company called March GL, which will be renamed Greenland Energy Company after it goes public this year, is hoping to vault itself into the upper echelons of the industry by extracting some of these billions of barrels of oil from a peninsula called Jameson Land sticking off the eastern coast of Greenland, the largest island in the world. The oil could be transformative for the US and European markets likely to receive it, injecting a massive wave of new supply that could help wean Europe from its dependence on Russian petroleum, currently under a steep sanctions regime as its war in Ukraine rages on.
In late October, Yahoo Finance accompanied March GL CEO and veteran oilman Robert Price, alongside the company’s lead petroleum engineer, to a town called Tasiilaq on Greenland’s eastern coast, where March GL’s contractors were preparing to store a collection of heavy machinery in town for the winter.
Price had been planning to barge the earthmovers up to Jameson Land, where they would begin constructing a three-mile-long road from the coast to the inland site where March GL will be drilling its first wells. Rough seas off the island’s eastern coast left the tugboat with which the company planned to haul the equipment unable to make the journey; by late autumn, the window of ice-free water to make this trip was closing too quickly to wait for a new one.
Instead, March GL’s team will keep much of its equipment in Tasiilaq until the spring or summer, when the ice will thaw, compressing their timelines — a testament to the tenuous-at-best operating conditions in Greenland.

Greenland’s geography is dominated by mountains and icy waters.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
Since that trip, the complexities of Price’s Greenland ambitions have only increased.
After the arrest and extraction of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in early January, President Trump renewed his push to annex the Danish autonomous territory. Trump said during a press briefing on Jan. 4 that “we need Greenland” to protect US national security interests in the Arctic, comments which set off a wave of pushback from the Greenlandic and Danish governments.
In a meeting with more than a dozen major oil executives at the White House, Trump said, “When we own it, we defend it. You don’t defend leases the same way, you have to own it,” in reference to Greenland.
“We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not.”
In a briefing to Congress on Jan. 6, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US would pursue a purchase of the territory, and Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry — appointed special envoy to Greenland by Trump — said he intends to “make Greenland a part of the U.S.”
At the same time, China and Russia have been increasing their military and shipping presence throughout the Arctic region, pressuring the US and Europe to ramp up their own combat preparedness and making Greenland a key security node. In January, a subsidiary of the Russian state-controlled nuclear corporation posted a video on Telegram of an icebreaking ship using the “Northern Sea Route,” which passes by Greenland to connect Europe and Asia in a path far faster than traversing the Suez Canal.
If Price’s company is successful, March GL’s operations could result in a major American energy presence in the High North at a time when territorial control has become a key focus of the White House.
Not that this was part of Price’s plan.

Once the waters freeze over in Tasiilaq, no supplies will get in or out until the ice thaws.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
2
‘A company with vision’
The stakes are high for Price’s company.
March GL is planning to spend hundreds of millions of dollars, pooled from Price’s personal network and the company’s upcoming SPAC merger that will take it public, to develop the Jameson Land prospect, with plans to drill two initial wells at a cost of $40 million for the first and roughly $20 million for the second. Despite the arduous nature of operating in a region cut off from the rest of the world, Price is determined to install the exploratory wells in 2026.
“It takes a company with vision to get the first two wells drilled,” Price told Yahoo Finance. “Upon a discovery here, we all of a sudden become close to a major oil and gas company overnight.”
In Greenland, where the local government has spent decades desperate for any source of economic development, March GL’s success is also no small matter. Keeping Greenland from claiming its own sovereignty is an annual $560 million or so in funding that the territory receives from Denmark, accounting for more than half of the Greenlandic government’s revenue. Billions of barrels of oil exported from Greenland’s shores, from which the local government would collect a share of the profits, would go toward filling in that half-a-billion-dollar gap.
Yet, Price is chasing a major frontier prospect at a time when market dynamics in the oil industry have made costly new exploration efforts the most unattractive they’ve been since prices crashed in 2014. The market is headed for a major wave of oversupply as the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, the 12-member cartel controlled by Saudi Arabia, has spent the past eight months raising its production targets, and US shale oil operators and other exporters in the Americas have maintained or increased their own outputs.
Prices were trending toward four-year lows when Price’s team last traveled to Greenland in September, and the market is likely to be oversupplied by more than 3 million barrels per day in 2026, according to the International Energy Agency. Some on Wall Street have warned of prices on West Texas Intermediate crude, the US benchmark, falling to the $30 per barrel range next year if measures aren’t taken to curtail supply. And that’s accounting for the oil the world’s biggest producers have already identified, let alone what they haven’t.
“At the risk of flogging a very dead horse, our message to the market has remained consistent since June 2023,” JPMorgan strategists wrote in a report earlier this year. “While demand is robust, supply is simply too abundant.”
But oil drilling is never without risk. For Price, this is the biggest shot of his career, a moonshot.
***
3
Jameson Land sits more than 250 miles above the Arctic Circle, isolated from civilization. A ring of high mountains to the west, the Arctic Ocean to the north and east, and the deepest fjord system in the world to the south protect the basin from the harsh arctic environment and rip current winds that roar off the ice sheet covering nearly all of Greenland.
Reaching the peninsula is famously difficult and highly dependent on weather and light. Visitors fly from Iceland and land on the icy runway at Kulusuk, tucked in the mountains of Greenland’s southeastern corner, then fly more than 500 miles further north to land on the dirt at Nerlerit Inaat Airport, a tiny operating station known as Constable Point. Finally, they must take a helicopter or boat another 20 miles out to Ittoqqortoormiit.
Price, the 65-year-old visionary leading the team prospecting Jameson Land, has spent most of his life in the oil industry, and he is betting that the spoils of the peninsula are worth the effort. Throughout his more than 40 years in the field, the chief executive of recently formed oil exploration company March GL has drilled frontier “wildcat” wells across the continental US, in states ranging from North Dakota and Oklahoma to Kansas and Nebraska.
But Greenland has long drawn Price’s attention. Family history ties him to the region, as does a desire for a discovery on a scale that has eluded him thus far.
“I have drilled for and found millions of barrels of oil over my career,” Price told Yahoo Finance. “I have never, never drilled for billions of barrels.”
With no roads connecting Greenland’s settlements, all travel around the island must be done by air or sea.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
4
As we flew over the Denmark Strait, Price described to me how he ended up leading the first major oil exploration project on Greenland in a generation. His father served as a weatherman in World War II, stationed by the US Air Force at a remote outpost on the arctic island. From that station, the elder Price wrote a series of letters describing the strangeness of being so far from civilization, the boredom and darkness, a polar bear fended off with a wooden two-by-four. Those letters were passed down to the younger Price, who was enamored with the alien world they depicted.
After making his way in the industry by managing some of the US’ largest oil and gas trusts — vast sums of riches made by earlier generations of wildcat oilmen — Price joined the ranks of a rarefied and dying breed of resource cowboys willing to take huge risks on even bigger payoffs, drilling for oil himself across the US.
Many of those sites turned up millions of barrels of oil. But the crown jewel — a billion-barrel discovery — never showed. It haunted Price and, eventually, drew him toward Greenland, one of the last untamed frontiers on the planet.
“I saw firsthand what oil wealth can do for families,” Price told me, “what it can do for communities and economic development.”
‘It’s high-risk stuff’
For several years, the prize of Greenland has been locked away from the market. In July 2021, the Naalakkersuisut government, concerned with preserving what remains of a pristine environment, passed a moratorium banning any new oil and gas drilling licenses.
In a statement issued when the decision was made public, Greenland’s government noted that, while data had shown vast potential for hydrocarbon development both on the island and beneath the waves off its shores, “the Greenlandic government believes the cost of extraction is too high.” The moratorium was being instated “for the sake of our nature, for the sake of our fisheries, for the sake of our tourism industry, and to focus our business on sustainable potentials.”
But in a stroke of luck for Price’s company, the government issued four hydrocarbon licenses to two small companies prior to the ban. Crucially, those licenses could not be annulled so long as the companies continued operating the sites.
Not that they were seen as having much promise. “My understanding is that the licenses that remain have very limited potential,” Mads Christensen, then the executive director of the Nordic branch of environmental advocacy group Greenpeace, told the Danish magazine Ingeniøren shortly after the decision was announced. But they remained active nonetheless. Today, three out of the four remain alive, all onshore oil and gas exploration licenses for acreage on Jameson Land.
When the set came up for an international bidding process, a subsidiary of the British exploration company 80 Mile bid for and won the licenses. Under the terms of a deal arranged between March GL and 80 Mile, Price’s company is funding new exploration efforts in return for a 70% stake in the license.
As the operational leader for the project, March GL will lead the drilling efforts, essentially grandfathered in under the nose of Greenland’s drilling moratorium. Upon merging with a blank-check company called Pelican Acquisition Corp. (PELIR), March GL will list on the public market in the first quarter of 2026 as Greenland Energy Company.
Data that Price’s company acquired and reprocessed tells him that, with these licenses, his team is sitting on 13 billion or more barrels of commercially recoverable oil, likely within the top five largest discoveries in the past 50 years, if accurate.
5

Price’s earthmoving equipment will remain stuck in Tasiilaq until it can be barged up the coast in spring.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
Getting to all that oil, however, will be immensely difficult.
Ice flowing from the north and blocking prominent sea corridors can delay equipment deliveries and working time, and rogue weather can make it impossible to operate at times. Price is looking to spud, or begin drilling, his first well in the second half of 2026. But there are no highways or even backroads to Jameson Land from any of Greenland’s major settlements in the West, and the waterways in and out of the area freeze over in winter’s subzero conditions.
To get the hulking masses of metal that make up oil-drilling rigs out to the sites where Price and his lead petroleum engineer, Neel Duncan, are planning to drill their first wells, they must build their own roads. Equipment must be barged from Canada, Alaska, or the American Gulf Coast in a process entirely dependent on weather, and crews must be flown in by helicopter to work year-round in conditions that range from uncomfortable to dangerous.
Even once the drilling rigs are in place and ready to break ground, they may miss the “traps,” or spots in the rock hundreds or thousands of feet below the surface where oil has spent millennia collecting.
“There’s been plenty of other basins where, in theory, you do your work, your evaluation, and you see the potential for there to be a large resource, then the wells don’t ultimately yield what you hoped to find,” said Ruaraidh Montgomery, head of energy trends and analysis at the industry intelligence firm Welligence.
“It’s high-risk stuff, and it will remain that way until they actually physically go and take a look at what can be done.”
***
6
The story of the oil industry is one of wild prospects that often left the explorers brave enough to chase them penniless. The masterstrokes of luck that have minted fortunes, however, keep investors coming back.
In the early 1960s, American geologists were pushing north, hunting for fossil fuels among the snow and ice of the Arctic Circle. By 1968, an American company called Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), today part of the British energy giant BP (BP), would make one of the most important discoveries in the history of the American energy sector: northern Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay, the largest oilfield in the US and a transformative asset for the country.
Decades later, in 2015, ExxonMobil (XOM) began drilling wells in the Atlantic waters about 100 miles off the coast of Guyana. Other companies tried and failed over the years to find oil beneath the seafloor, but in March 2015, workers onboard an oil-drilling ship called the Deepwater Champion placed the first of what would become dozens of wells into the water.
By 2022, Exxon had increased its Guyana estimates to 11 billion barrels of recoverable oil, a discovery that has helped the largest publicly owned oil company in the world vault past its peers. The area, called the Stabroek block, is now one of the most active and high-value oil plays globally.
Nearly 20 years after ARCO discovered Prudhoe Bay, the company was looking for new prospects, acquiring a license to explore a 10,000 square kilometer patch of land on Greenland’s Jameson Land. In the 1980s, the company spent more than $100 million in today’s dollars building out a bare minimum of infrastructure that included the Constable Point airport, a collection of less than a dozen buildings and a small aircraft hangar sitting adjacent to a dirt runway less than 1,000 feet from the waters of the peninsula’s fjords.
By 1989, a study of samples pulled from Jameson Land by ARCO and the Geological Survey of Greenland heralded good fortune for hydrocarbon exploration on the peninsula. Not only was there oil underfoot, but its profile was nearly identical to that of the oil being pulled from the floor of northern Europe’s North Sea — a light, sweet version of the substance, known as Brent (BZ=F), that has become the international benchmark for crude oil pricing, given demand for the oil’s profile.
Refiners may process 40 or 50 different grades, or chemical makeups, of oil on any given day. But light, sweet crude is particularly desirable because it requires a much smaller amount of processing to turn the substance into products like diesel or jet fuel than the heavier, more “sour” — or sulfurous — oils found elsewhere around the globe, according to several analysts at energy intelligence firms. Most of the oil discovered in Venezuela, for instance, is of this latter variety.
Millions of years ago, the areas that are now Greenland’s east coast and Europe’s North Sea were conjoined, geologic studies have shown. They were separated over time as volcanic activity shifted tectonic plates. But the fossil fuels, pushed apart with the land masses, remain similar.

The sky over Greenland glows pale yellow and blue as the sun rises.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
7
“I’m very confident in those rocks just because it’s the same geology as the North Sea,” Duncan said. Even if the first two wells miss traps and come up dry, “We’ll still be fine,” Duncan told me. The data they’re able to gather, he said, will almost guarantee success on following attempts.
Yet, despite the promise of what could be another Prudhoe Bay-scale discovery, by 1990 ARCO had surrendered its Greenland licenses. The exploration rights, and all of the company’s data, were turned over to a Danish government-funded research institute called the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland. Years later, the 80 Mile subsidiary White Flame won the licenses and data, which Price and his team have reprocessed.
But it was not without reason that ARCO pulled out of Greenland. Not only had oil prices collapsed globally, making the risk of a frontier development with high upfront costs less attractive, but the logistics of operating in eastern Greenland are brutal, and the conditions even worse. In Jameson Land, roughly halfway up Greenland, the sun sets in early December and won’t reemerge over the horizon until late January — polar night.
For every Guyana-sized discovery, there are dozens of examples where the gamble didn’t pay off. Between 2005 and 2008, British energy major Shell (SHEL) went on a shopping spree, ultimately spending more than $2 billion buying up leases in the Chukchi Sea off the coast of Alaska. At the time, the Arctic, with its reserves long locked miles below the ice, was viewed as the next major frontier for oil wildcatting.
Shell’s progress in the Arctic was mired for years in delays ranging from pushback by environmental activists to the industry-wide public relations fallout of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Once the company finally managed to mobilize and begin deploying resources to the area in 2012, Shell’s crews faced some of the harshest conditions on the planet, surrounded by water only four degrees above freezing in all directions and with only four months, from July to October, to get everything set up before ice set in for the winter.
Everything went wrong. A containment dome, meant to prevent blowouts, was “crushed like a beer can” during testing, according to a local radio station. One rig ran aground in a storm, and another suffered mechanical failures. Shell called off the efforts after spending $7 billion. Three years later, Shell tried one more time. But shortly after breaking ground on its first well, the company announced it was ending its Arctic campaign “for the foreseeable future.” Initial results from the wellhead weren’t enough to justify continuing.

Robert Price, right, is pursuing a frontier prospect in an era of mass de-risking for the oil and gas industry.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
8
‘Good luck’
The largest discoveries throughout the industry’s history have long been the domain of the largest companies in the world. Mexico’s Cantarell Field has been handled by Petróleos Mexicanos — Mexico’s state-controlled oil company, referred to as PEMEX — since its discovery. The Stabroek oilfield, 100 miles off Guyana’s western coast, is operated by a partnership between Exxon Mobil, Chevron (CVX), and the China National Offshore Oil Corporation, or CNOOC. Kazakhstan’s Kashagan oilfield was discovered by a consortium that included Exxon, Shell, BP, and the French and Italian majors TotalEnergies (TTE) and Eni (E).
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, at the same time that ARCO engineers were surveying Jameson Land, a coalition of companies, including Exxon, BP, and Shell, received licenses to prospect for oil through northeastern and northwestern Greenland, which were thought to be rich in fossil fuel reserves due to the regions’ geological history. The coalition, in partnership with the national Greenlandic oil company Nunaoil, performed initial testing on the regions, often with promising results, but in the mid-2010s, all of those companies surrendered their licenses.
“In a period of less than 10 years, Greenland has seen a dramatic change in industry interest from being one of the hottest regions for investments to virtually no activities at all,” said geologist Flemming Christiansen, who has spent the past 50 years studying Greenland’s petroleum and mineral extraction potential.
Some of the companies’ departures from Greenland were driven by new data that pared back reserve estimates or complicated the extraction process. Much of it was due to a crash in oil prices. In 2014, a wave of oversupply crushed the industry, cutting global prices by more than half. The largest oil and gas companies, which depend on stable returns to fund steady dividend payments, pivoted away from frontier developments and invested what exploration budgets they still had in well-known prospects located in countries with oil-producing histories.
The world’s major oil companies have never reentered Greenland, leaving an opportunity for March GL.

Tasiilaq is the largest settlement on Greenland’s isolated eastern coast.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
9
“It would be a bit of a stretch [for the majors] to go and drop a lot of money on new exploration wells, just on the basis of seismic data that was shot in the ’70s,” Tom Liles, senior vice president of upstream research at industry intelligence firm Rystad Energy, told Yahoo Finance.
“But certainly, I think you could envision a scenario where there is a big discovery that proves analogous to the [Alaskan] North Slope or the North Sea in some respects, there could be some interest in gaining a portfolio position there.”
March GL’s assumptions on the oil reserves are based on seismic data, or underground radar readings, taken by ARCO in the 1980s, when the now-defunct company was first prospecting the basin. Price debated reshooting his own seismic data before drilling a well, but he told me he was counseled by colleagues in the field — including petroleum engineers who worked with ARCO at the time — that he would be better off skipping that step and going straight to getting a drill bit into the ground, which would provide reams of more accurate data.
“If it was a guaranteed discovery and it was all definitely going to be there, then someone else would have done it,” Saskia Goacher, an energy analyst at Welligence, told me. “It’s still kind of up in the air whether it will actually be there.”
It will take years before any true assessment of Jameson Land’s potential reserves can be made, and the seismic data Price’s team is working from only covers half of the basin, leaving the rest unknown, he told me. Exxon, for instance, drilled the first of its wells in the Stabroek field, called Liza 1, in 2015 and raised its projections for recoverable oil by piecemeal until they hit 11 billion barrels in 2022.
March GL, Price said, stands for March 2025, when the company was founded, and “Greenland.”
Or, depending on the day, “Good luck.”
***
10
We landed on Greenland at around 8 a.m. local time, but it could have been the middle of the night as the pilot touched the twin-engine plane down in between mountain peaks. In November, much of central and northern Greenland only experiences three to four hours of daylight.
By the end of the month, the entire share of the island above the Arctic Circle, roughly two-thirds of its landmass, won’t see the sun again until late January or early February.
A skeleton crew of maybe five greeted us with smoked salmon and cucumber sandwiches inside the slight building adjacent to the runway at Kulusuk, a settlement of around 240 people in Greenland’s southeastern corner, just as the sun began to breach the horizon. The plan had been to land in Kulusuk, fly north another couple of hours to Jameson Land and visit the sites Price and Duncan are prospecting for their first two oil wells, then fly west to the town of Tasiilaq, where contractors are preparing the Caterpillar (CAT) and Hitachi Construction Machinery Co. (6305.T) earth-moving equipment March GL will use to build a road from the coast to the company’s prospective drilling site.

Kulusk’s airstrip is manned by a small crew.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
But when we arrived in Kulusuk, the polite but short-spoken pilot who had flown us from Iceland said a trip to Jameson Land would be impossible. Not only was there a storm brewing further north, but daylight was limited, and he worried we wouldn’t have time to arrive at Constable Point, see the drill site, and fly back to Kulusuk before sundown.
If we got stuck at Constable Point overnight, he said, there was no deicer at the site to prepare the plane for a flight south in the morning. Instead, we boarded a helicopter to Tasiilaq, cruising over the landscapes that keep settlements on the island geographically isolated.
In the air over Greenland, outside of the settled regions, mountain ranges reach as far back as the horizon, cut by glaciers that have spent millions of years carving the landscape. The sky glows blue and yellow before reaching pitch-black darkness once the sun goes down, leaving only stars and the Northern Lights to illuminate swaths of the unsettled wilderness.
11
Greenland is more than twice the size of Texas, but there are fewer than 100 miles of roads throughout the island, and none of them connect Greenland’s towns to each other. All travel must be by air or sea.
Tasiilaq, a town of less than 2,000 permanent residents, is the largest settlement on Greenland’s remote east coast. Its port is a key pipeline for supplies that are delivered along the town’s waterways, but those waters freeze over the winter, typically around the end of November. Once winter sets in, no ships — and no deliveries — will get in or out of Tasiilaq until the ice melts, usually in late May.
March GL’s difficulty with its earthmoving equipment in Tasiilaq, delayed by the frozen waters off the coast, is visible proof of the precarity of operating in Greenland, where the weather is less of a nuisance and more of a legitimate operational risk. And these delays, in part, also explain why the world’s largest oil companies have, for the past decade, largely ignored Greenland’s hydrocarbon potential despite a large body of evidence suggesting the land is oil-rich.
Price is attempting to pull off his company’s Jameson Land exploration during a period of de-risking for the largest players in the oil and gas sector. The majors, focused on cost-cutting and dividend payments, have laid off thousands of staff in the last year and cut back on their exploration efforts, instead focusing on finding new barrels by drilling more wells around existing hotspots in a process known as a “tieback.”
If Price and Duncan’s first set of wells yields the results they are hoping for — commercially recoverable reserves counted in the billions of barrels of oil — the majors’ reluctance toward Greenland is likely to change, several analysts said. The risk is not extracting the oil once a field has been established, but in taking the shot on the unknown and hoping for success.

Tasiilaq is full of Greenland’s signature brightly colored buildings.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
12
March GL is already in conversation with some of the world’s largest energy companies, Price said, and his company has invited them to visit the site once March GL begins drilling. Some of those companies’ exploration managers, he told me, came to Jameson Land as young geologists early in their careers, and they are closely watching Price and Duncan’s success or failure.
“This is an exploratory project; it’s in the Arctic,” Price said. “Once we have success here, they will come and they will be very interested in potentially partnering with us.”
Such a move by an oil major would essentially be required for Price’s scheme to work, multiple analysts told Yahoo Finance, due to the sheer scale of infrastructure needed to extract massive volumes of oil. But if that were to happen, the Jameson Land basin would likely see a steel city spring up on its shores.
Storage tanks, pipelines, processing facilities, and power plants would all need to be built. In the deep waters of the nearby Scoresby Sund fjord system, a port big enough to berth crude oil tankers may be erected. Power plants will be required to electrify the operation.
For the crew, there will be a need for a town like that built at Los Alamos. Airports, helipads, medical facilities, and a tangle of winterized roads would be necessary. As in Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay, where there once was nothing, a sprawling metal jungle could emerge.
Costs could balloon. And it’s not only analysts who think a maturing Jameson Land project would require backers with more resources than Price’s March GL.
“We hope that some of the big guys [would come] in and take over because they are the ones that can facilitate this in a proper way,” Jørgen Hammeken-Holm, the permanent secretary of Greenland’s Ministry of Business, responsible for overseeing mineral resources and energy, told Yahoo Finance.
***
13
Oil and gas are not Greenland’s only natural riches. The island, still largely unblemished, also holds beneath its surface a massive amount of minerals and metals crucial to the global economy. In the far northern region of Greenland, less than 500 miles from the North Pole, the Citronen Fjord is home to what is believed to be one of the largest undeveloped deposits of zinc on the planet.
To the West, licenses have been granted for potential extraction projects focused on graphite and the feedstock ores used to produce titanium, while others have proposed prospects focused on rare earth metals. In the South, miners plan to dig for gold. Eastern Greenland is oil territory.
“Greenland’s known and proven quantities of critical minerals, rare earths, and oil could well provide the industrial building blocks necessary for an advanced global economy,” said James Kiernan, chairman of the company operating Greenland’s only active mining project, Lumina Global.
Kiernan’s private credit firm, Cordiant Capital, has provided backing to Lumina, which has spent the past decade operating in Greenland and currently runs the only commercially operating mine on the island. Lumina’s operations at a mining site in the southeastern corner of Greenland extract and export tens of thousands of tons of anorthite, a mineral used to manufacture glass and ceramics.
Anorthite is also used as a feedstock for the industrial production of cement and alumina, the primary chemical compound used to smelt aluminum. As in Greenland, where the environment can seem almost alien, anorthite is abundant in the crust of the moon.
‘These are our rocks, this is our soil’
Though the Greenlandic government has granted a litany of mining licenses over the years, only a few have ever been developed, and Lumina’s anorthite mine is the only one of those still standing. Many licensees surrender their rights before ever breaking ground, stymied by the same logistical hurdles that make oil and gas production unattractive to major global companies concentrated on low-risk opportunities.
With a population of less than 60,000, labor is in short supply, and most projects are fly-in, fly-out rotations of weeks at a time. Delivery of food and equipment is complex. Weather can keep crews stuck at a remote site for weeks longer than planned. The start-up costs are leagues higher than elsewhere in the world.
But the promise of economic development is enticing for many Greenlanders. When, in 2009, the island passed laws establishing its right of self-governance from Denmark, a requirement that half of any income above a certain threshold Greenland receives from its subsoil resources be deducted from the grants it receives from the Danish government was written into the act, chipping away at Greenland’s dependence on the European nation.
“There is a strong drive for activity within the minerals sector because that could lead up to more sovereignty or autonomy,” the Greenland Business Association’s managing director, Christian Keldsen, who was involved with now-dormant offshore oil drilling projects in Greenland earlier in his career, told Yahoo Finance. “These are our rocks, this is our soil.”

Kulusuk, in the southeastern corner of Greenland, is tucked between mountains.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
14
The locals, Keldsen told me, have been especially supportive of resource development, even as the government has pushed back and moved to lean toward environmental protection and renewable energy sources. Between flights, Price and Duncan described to our Air Greenland helicopter pilot, a gray-haired and brisk man named Jergen, what they were hoping to accomplish. The Greenlandic people, Jergen said, had been watching oil and gas developments closely for years, hopeful that one would come to fruition and begin generating tax revenue and royalties for the locals, at one moment telling Price to “please find oil.”
“We’ve seen for many, many years that Greenland would like to get independence, and in order to get independence, you have to be economically supporting your political system,” Christiansen, the Greenland analyst, said.
Driving the lack of environmental concern from many of Greenland’s locals is the fact that these resource developments — oil wells on Jameson Land, mines in the far north, and others — are so far removed from population that they are unlikely to affect local subsistence hunting and fishing activity, Hammeken-Holm told me.
“It doesn’t make me worried. It’s going to be set up in the middle of nowhere. It’s going to be a city without any connections,” he said. Hammeken-Holm pointed to the territory’s strict environmental protection policies for extraction projects as further reasoning for his security.
Yet, the world’s interest in Greenland’s resources hasn’t come without pushback. In 2007, an Australian company called Energy Transition Minerals (GDLNF) applied for a license to explore a patch of earth in southern Greenland, known as Kuannersuit in Greenlandic, or the Kvanefjeld deposit. Originally prospected in the 1950s for its uranium stores, the site is one of the world’s largest undeveloped deposits of rare earth minerals, which have become a crucial geopolitical sticking point amid the ongoing trade war between the US and China.
Eight years later, in 2015, Energy Transition Minerals submitted a plan to build an open pit mine focused on rare earth minerals, with plans to extract uranium as a co-product. But the project faced intense scrutiny from locals in the nearby town of Narsaq, worried that uranium development so close to home would create significant radioactive waste and pose steep health and environmental hazards.
In 2021, before the mine could be developed, the Greenlandic government passed laws banning the exploration and exploitation of resources that exceeded defined uranium content limits. Because the deposits at the Kvanefjeld deposit are above those limits, Energy Transition Minerals hasn’t been able to develop the site, which remains the subject of an active court case.
“That was a bit of an issue, the risk of contamination so close to the project,” Keldsen said. The further away from anywhere where there’s a relevant resource hunting ground or where people are living, Keldsen told me, the more supportive — or in some cases, indifferent — Greenland’s people are likely to be.

Greenland’s mountains have been cut by glaciers over millions of years.
(Yahoo Finance/Jake Conley) ● Jake Conley
15
There is also an expectation among Greenlanders that they will benefit from the extraction of resources from the island, Keldsen said.
For generations, hunting and fishing have been Greenland’s primary industries, providing the subsistence to support local communities. But large-scale industrial projects have remained an untouched development in Greenland despite its abundance of natural resources, in part because the territory does not have the expertise or capital to kickstart large-scale mineral extraction.
“It means that someone else is being allowed to make money off our resources,” Keldsen told me. In return, “There should be some income, there should be jobs created.”
Under the agreement made between March GL and the Greenlandic government, the territory will receive a sliding scale of payments from Price’s company, rising as March GL hits certain profit margins from a 3.75% royalty to a royalty of 15%. The scheme is known as an “R-factor” system, a model widely used by governments with frontier resource land, such as Egypt, Algeria, or Alaska.
Because the royalty payments don’t begin until the company running the extraction activity has reached a certain level of profitability, the system encourages exploration that is both high-risk and highly capital-intensive in the initial stages. If the project turns into a windfall, the host government can capture a greater slice of the profits.
The scheme also accounts for market instability without needing renegotiation. If oil prices were to suddenly jump while Price’s company is extracting crude oil, Greenland’s share of the profits rises in tandem with March GL’s profitability. If oil prices fell, the payments due to Greenland automatically scale down. At current prices, 13 billion barrels of crude oil would be worth more than $800 billion.
“That potential revenue stream is the closest revenue Greenland has to independence,” Price said. “It could be the genesis for transforming their country.”
***
16
The term “wildcatting” dates back to the Civil War period, when poorly collateralized banks established in the American West and willing to print paper currency in an era with no national banking system were said to be engaged in “wildcat banking,” a derogatory term meant to imply risk and unreliability. Over time, the term was co-opted by the hydrocarbon industry, applied to the oilmen who ventured beyond known land and took the risk of drilling for oil in untamed wilderness.
When Price talks about the project, he speaks with an unshakable faith that the oil he’s hoping to find will be there, that the reserves will contain the volumes he’s planning for, and that he will be the one to discover it.
But it is still, at its core, a wildcat prospect.
The weeks between our trip to Greenland and the publication of this story are another case in point.
Shortly after the US military’s removal of Nicolás Maduro from Venezuela, Katie Miller, a former Trump administration official and the wife of Trump’s key advisor, Stephen Miller, posted a cartoon of Greenland covered in an American flag on X, captioned: “SOON.”
If we don’t do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and we’re not gonna have Russia or China as a neighbor,” Trump said in his comments at the White House on Jan. 9.
“I would like to make a deal the easy way, but if we don’t do it the easy way, we’ll do it the hard way.”

President Donald Trump answers reporter questions during a meeting with oil executives in the East Room of the White House, Friday, Jan. 9, 2026, in Washington.
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon) ● ASSOCIATED PRESS
17
“This is the Western hemisphere, and American dominance is going to continue under this president,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in comments to the press on Jan. 7, noting that President Trump “keeps his options open” and therefore would not rule out potential military force in Greenland.
Responding to the White House’s statements over control of Greenland — including a refusal by Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to rule out militaristic action — Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said such a move would trigger a breakdown of international relations.
“I will also make it clear that if the US chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, then everything stops, including NATO and thus the security that has been established since the end of the Second World War,” Frederiksen said to Danish broadcaster TV2 on Jan. 5
On Jan. 8, Denmark’s ambassador to the US and Greenland’s chief representative to the US met with members of the White House National Security Council about Trump’s renewed push for potential annexation, according to the Associated Press.
“Greenland’s return to the headlines is no coincidence, and the intensity of this debate confirms that energy security and national security are now inseparable,” Price told Yahoo Finance last week.
In September 2025, Price’s team took the arduous route to Jameson Land to finalize decisions over where they plan to install their first wells. Difficult and tiring as it is, Price and Duncan, the petroleum engineer, believe the journey was worth it.
The two men are steadfast in their conviction that every time they visit the peninsula, they are standing on one of the largest untapped hydrocarbon reserves in the world, projected to hold billions of barrels of oil that have never been recovered.
On Jameson Land, rolling lowlands stretch for miles in each direction, covered in a layer of vegetation that has thrived in the basin’s weather-protected region. The ground, a rust-colored mossy carpet, bends and bounces back into shape underfoot.
As they stood near the proposed drill sites in September, Duncan bent down and touched the shimmery liquid pooled beneath his feet, seeping out of the mossy ground. He stood and brought his hand close to his face, rubbing the fluid between his fingers. The petroleum engineer had, by this point in his life, spent more than 40 years working on oilfields and was intimately familiar with the substance.
“Beautiful,” he said. “Smells like crude.”
Jake Conley is a breaking news reporter covering US equities for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X at @byjakeconley or email him at [email protected].
18