As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2026.

Registration No. 333-   

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

Under

The Securities Act of 1933

 

SCRIBE THERAPEUTICS INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware		2836		82-2157847
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

1150 Marina Village Parkway

Alameda, California 94501

(510) 626-8587

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

Benjamin L. Oakes, Ph.D.

Chief Executive Officer

1150 Marina Village Parkway

Alameda, California, 94501

(510) 626-8587

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copies to:

 

Effie Toshav Robert A. Freedman Ryan Mitteness Fenwick & West LLP 401 Union Street 5th Floor Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 389-4510		B. Shayne Kennedy Ross McAloon Latham & Watkins LLP 650 Town Center Drive 20th Floor Costa Mesa, California 92626 (714) 540-1235

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:

As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. ☐

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer		☐		Accelerated filer		☐
Non-accelerated filer		☒		Smaller reporting company		☒
				Emerging growth company		☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐

 

 

Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED      , 2026

   Shares

 

Common Stock

 

 

Scribe Therapeutics Inc. is offering      shares of its common stock. This is our initial public offering of shares of common stock, and no public market currently exists for our common stock. We anticipate that the initial public offering price will be between $  and $  per share.

We have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market, or Nasdaq, under the symbol “SCTX.” We believe that upon the completion of this offering, we will meet the standards for listing on Nasdaq, and the closing of this offering is contingent upon such listing.

We are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company” as defined under the federal securities laws and, as such, we have elected to comply with certain reduced reporting requirements for this prospectus and may elect to do so in future filings. See “Prospectus summary—Implications of being an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company.”

 

 

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 18 to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of our common stock.

 

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

 

 

		Per Share				Total
Initial public offering price		$				$
Underwriting discounts and commissions(1)		$				$
Proceeds, before expenses, to us		$				$

(1)	See “Underwriting” for additional information regarding underwriting compensation.

To the extent that the underwriters sell more than      shares of our common stock, we have granted the underwriters an option for a period of 30 days to purchase up to      additional shares at the initial public offering price less underwriting discounts and commissions.

The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock to purchasers on or about     , 2026.

 

 

 

Leerink Partners		Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC		Guggenheim Securities		Wells Fargo Securities

 

 

     , 2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

		Page
Prospectus Summary			1
The Offering			13
Summary Financial Data			16
Risk Factors			18
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements			81
Market and Industry Data			83
Use of Proceeds			84
Dividend Policy			86
Capitalization			87
Dilution			89
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			92
Business			115
Management			186
Executive Compensation			192
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions			206
Principal Stockholders			208
Description of Capital Stock			210
Shares Eligible for Future Sale			216
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders			218
Underwriting			223
Legal Matters			230
Experts			230
Where You Can Find Additional Information			230
Index to Financial Statements			F-1

 

 

Neither we nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectuses prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We and the underwriters do not take responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the shares of common stock offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus or in any applicable free writing prospectus is current only as of its date, regardless of its time of delivery or the time of any sale of shares of our common stock.

For investors outside of the United States: Neither we nor any of the underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than the United States. Persons outside of the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares of our common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making your decision to invest in shares of our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this prospectus, including in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of or that we deem immaterial may also become important factors that adversely affect our business. We cannot assure you that any of the events discussed below will not occur. These events could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. If that were to happen, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks related to our financial position, limited operating history and need for additional capital

We have a limited operating history, have not completed any clinical trials, and have no products approved for commercial sale, which may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company with a limited operating history on which to base your investment decision. Biotechnology product development is a highly speculative undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk, and we have yet to complete any clinical trials. We commenced operations in 2017, and our operations to date have been limited primarily to business planning, raising capital, acquiring certain intellectual property rights, developing and engineering our two proprietary technologies, the Epigenetic Long-Term X-Repressor, or ELXR, and X-Editor, or XE, identifying potential product candidates, and advancing our pipeline programs. All of our programs are in the research and discovery, preclinical or clinical stage of development and their risk of failure is high. To date, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to identifying, acquiring and developing our product candidates, building our pipeline, conducting preclinical studies and our clinical trial, organizing and staffing our company, business planning, establishing and maintaining our intellectual property portfolio, raising capital, and providing general and administrative support for these operations.

We have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully complete any clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a clinical or commercial-scale product or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. As a result, particularly in light of the rapidly evolving field of genetic medicine, it may be more difficult for you to accurately evaluate the performance of our business to date or to predict our likelihood of success and viability than it would be if we had a longer operating history.

In addition, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and other known and unknown factors and risks frequently experienced by clinical-stage biotechnology companies developing targeted product candidates for cardiometabolic diseases.

We have a history of operating losses, we have never generated any product revenue, and we may not achieve or sustain profitability. We anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

We have incurred significant net losses in each reporting period since our inception, have not generated any product revenue to date, and have financed our operations principally through private placements of our preferred stock and collaboration revenue. Our net losses were $47.8 million and $21.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, respectively, and $17.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $175.1 million. Substantially all of our losses have resulted from expenses incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations.

 

18

We expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue our research and development of our lead program, product candidates, and our technology. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, such that a period-to-period comparison of our results of operations may not be a good indication of our future performance.

We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:

 

•

advance our lead product candidate, STX-1150, through clinical trials and conduct later stage clinical trials;

 

•

initiate clinical trials for our STX-1200 and STX-1400 developmental programs;

 

•

manufacture, or have manufactured, preclinical, clinical and potentially commercial supplies of any product candidates;

 

•

further develop our proprietary technologies, ELXR and XE, as well as engineer new technologies;

 

•

begin or continue preclinical development of our other undisclosed cardiometabolic programs;

 

•

identify and develop potential product candidates;

 

•

experience any delays in our preclinical studies and clinical trials, if any, due to unforeseen events;

 

•

obtain, expand, maintain, defend, and enforce our intellectual property portfolio;

 

•

seek regulatory approvals for any product candidates;

 

•

establish a sales, marketing, and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any product candidates, if approved;

 

•

comply with our obligations under the agreements governing our licenses, collaborations, and strategic partnerships;

 

•

establish additional licenses, collaborations, or strategic partnerships;

 

•

acquire or in-license intellectual property and technologies, work with strategic partners to support and expand our research and discovery, and initiate and conduct preclinical and clinical programs;

 

•

hire additional clinical, scientific, and management personnel, as well as administrative staff to support the growth of our business;

 

•

add operational, financial, and management information systems and personnel; and

 

•

incur additional legal, accounting, and other costs associated with operating as a public company following the completion of this offering.

Even if we succeed in developing STX-1150 or product candidates in any of our other programs, we may never achieve commercialization, and we may continue to incur substantial research and development expenses and other expenditures to develop and market additional product candidates. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. The size of our future losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future growth of our expenses and our ability to generate product revenue, if any. Our prior losses and expected future losses have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and working capital.

Our management and our independent registered public accounting firm have concluded that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our stockholders may lose some or all of their investment in our company.

Our audited financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus, were prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that we will continue in

 

19

operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize our assets and satisfy our liabilities in the normal course of business and do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from our inability to continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $49.7 million. We have incurred recurring losses since inception, including a net loss of $17.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $175.1 million. Based on our capital resources on hand at March 31, 2026, which consists of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, we will not have sufficient cash on hand to support current operations for at least twelve months from the date of issuance of the financial statements. This condition raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Additionally, if we are unable to obtain funding, through equity financings, debt financings, or other capital sources, we could be forced to delay, reduce, or eliminate some or all of our programs, product candidates, development of our platform, or commercialization efforts. Any such actions could adversely affect our business prospects or our ability to continue as a going concern. There is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining sufficient funding on terms acceptable to fund continuing operations, if at all. Even if we are able to raise additional capital, there is no guarantee the proceeds would be sufficient to support our operating plans for at least the next twelve months from the date of issuance of our financial statements. If we cannot continue as a going concern, we may have to liquidate our assets and may receive less than the value at which those assets are carried on our combined financial statements, and it is likely that our stockholders may lose some or all of their investment in us.

Even if we complete this offering, we will need substantial additional funds to pursue our business objectives, which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed may force us to delay, limit, or terminate our development initiatives and programs or other operations.

Identifying, developing, and continuing the research and development of targets and product candidates is a time-consuming, capital-intensive, and uncertain process that takes years to complete. If we identify any product candidates and initiate any preclinical studies or clinical trials, development will require substantial additional funds, and such products or studies may not be successful or may require us to significantly expand or create our development, regulatory, manufacturing, marketing, and sales capabilities. We have used substantial amounts of cash since inception to develop our proprietary technologies, ELXR and XE, and because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we have prioritized our research and discovery programs in specific indications. Further, we will require significant funds to conduct further research and development and initiate preclinical testing and clinical trials for any product candidates, to seek regulatory approvals for any product candidates, and to manufacture and market products, if any, which are approved for commercial sale. In addition, upon the completion of this offering, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. We may also need to raise additional funds sooner if we choose to pursue additional indications or markets for any product candidates or otherwise expand more rapidly than we presently anticipate.

The development of genetic medicines through our proprietary technologies, ELXR and XE, including the initiation of clinical trials and preclinical studies for our pipeline programs targeting PCSK9, LPA, and APOC3 and any product candidates, will require substantial funds. As of March 31, 2026, we had $49.7 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments, together with the net proceeds from this offering, will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through     .

However, our future capital requirements and the period for which we expect our existing resources to support our operations, fund continued growth of our operations, research and development of product candidates, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures, may vary significantly from what we expect and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to

 

20

favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. Our spending levels vary based on new and ongoing research and development and other corporate activities. Because of the length of time and challenges associated with research and development of genetic medicines using genetic modification technologies, including through our proprietary technologies, ELXR and XE, the development and success of our lead product candidate, development programs or any other product candidates, is highly uncertain. We are unable to estimate the actual funds we will require for development and any marketing and commercialization activities for any approved products in the future. Our funding requirements for our proprietary technologies, ELXR and XE, any product candidates and our ongoing operations, both near- and long-term, will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

 

•

the timing, results, cost and progress of preclinical studies and clinical trials for our STX-1150 product candidate, our STX-1200 and STX-1400 development programs and any other future product candidates;

 

•

the progress and success of developing CRISPR by Design and our ELXR and XE technologies;

 

•

the cost of regulatory submissions and timing of regulatory approvals, if any;

 

•

the number and scope of preclinical and clinical programs we decide to pursue;

 

•

the progress of the development efforts of parties with whom we have entered into licenses, collaborations, and strategic partnerships;

 

•

the timing and amount of milestone and other payments we are obligated to make under our licensing agreements, including the UCB Exclusive License Agreement (as defined herein), Acuitas Agreement (as defined herein) and any future license agreements;

 

•

the cash requirements of any future acquisitions of, or discovery of, product candidates;

 

•

our ability to establish and maintain collaborations, strategic partnerships or marketing, distribution, licensing or other strategic arrangements with third parties on favorable terms, if at all;

 

•

our ability to achieve sufficient market acceptance, adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors and adequate market share and revenue for any approved product candidates;

 

•

the costs involved in prosecuting and enforcing patent and other intellectual property claims;

 

•

the costs of manufacturing any product candidates;

 

•

the cost of commercialization activities if any product candidates are approved for sale, including marketing, sales and distribution costs;

 

•

our efforts to enhance operational systems and hire additional personnel, including personnel to support development of any product candidates;

 

•

potential delays in our preclinical studies and clinical trials, if any, due to unforeseen events; and

 

•

our need to implement additional internal systems and infrastructure, including financial and reporting systems to satisfy our obligations as a public company.

If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis or on acceptable terms, we may have to delay, reduce, or terminate our research and development programs and preclinical studies or clinical trials, limit strategic opportunities or undergo reductions in our workforce or other corporate restructuring activities. We do not expect to realize revenue from sales of commercial products or royalties from licensed products in the foreseeable future, if at all, and, in no event, before any product candidates are clinically tested, approved for commercialization and successfully marketed.

We will be required to seek additional funding in the future and currently intend to do so through public or private equity offerings or debt financings, additional licensing agreements and/or collaborations, credit or loan facilities, or a combination of one or more of these funding sources. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity

 

21

securities, our stockholders will suffer dilution and the terms of any financing may adversely affect the rights of our stockholders. In addition, as a condition to providing additional funds to us, future investors may demand, and may be granted, rights superior to those of existing stockholders. Our future debt financings, if available, are likely to involve restrictive covenants limiting our flexibility in conducting future business activities, and, in the event of insolvency, debt holders would be repaid before holders of our equity securities receive any distribution of our corporate assets. If we raise additional funds through licensing or collaboration arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to product candidates or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. Our license and collaboration agreements and any future collaboration or other agreements may also be terminated if we are unable to meet the payment or other obligations under the agreements. We also could be required to seek collaborators for product candidates at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable or relinquish our rights to product candidates or technologies that we otherwise would seek to develop or commercialize ourselves. Failure to obtain capital when needed on acceptable terms, or at all, may force us to delay, limit, or terminate our product development and commercialization of our current or future product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Risks related to discovery, development, and commercialization

We are early in our development efforts and we expect it will be many years before we commercialize any product candidate, if ever. If we are unable to advance any product candidates into and through clinical trials, obtain regulatory approval and ultimately commercialize any product candidates, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

The success of our business depends primarily upon our ability to identify, develop, and commercialize product candidates using our ELXR and XE technologies. We have initiated clinical development of our lead product candidate, STX-1150, and are in preclinical development for our STX-1200 and STX-1400 development programs. Our future success depends heavily on the successful identification and development of product candidates using our ELXR and XE technologies. Our ability to generate product revenue, which we do not expect will occur for many years, if ever, will be a result of the successful development and eventual commercialization of our product candidates, which may never occur. Any product candidates we develop may have adverse side effects or fail to demonstrate safety, purity or potency, which is considered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, to include effectiveness. Additionally, our product candidates may have other characteristics that may make them impractical or prohibitively expensive for large-scale manufacturing. Furthermore, our product candidates may not receive regulatory approval or, if they do, they may not be accepted by the medical community or patients, or may not be competitive with other products. We currently have no product revenue and we may never be able to successfully develop or commercialize a marketable product.

All of our product candidates and development programs are still in early stages of development. Our research methodology may be unsuccessful in identifying potential targets and product candidates, our product candidates may be shown to have harmful side effects in preclinical in vitro experiments or animal model studies, they may not show promising signals of therapeutic activity in such experiments or studies or they may have other characteristics that may make the product candidates impractical to manufacture or develop, unmarketable, or unlikely to receive regulatory approval. We may experience delays in initiating, conducting, or completing preclinical studies for a variety of reasons, including due to supply chain interruptions that could lead to shortages in materials or animals required for such studies. For example, recently, it has been reported that there is a shortage of non-human primates, or NHPs, for biomedical research, which are used in our preclinical studies.

Commencing a clinical trial in the United States is also subject to the FDA allowing the clinical trial to proceed under an IND and finalizing the trial design based on discussions with the FDA. Even after we receive and incorporate advice from the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, these regulatory authorities could disagree that we have satisfied their requirements to commence our clinical trial or change their position on the acceptability of our trial design or the clinical endpoints selected, which may require us to complete

 

22

additional studies or trials or impose stricter conditions on the conduct of our clinical trials than we currently expect. There are comparable processes and risks applicable to clinical trial applications in other countries, including in Europe.

Even if we complete the clinical trials necessary to support submission of a Biologics License Application, or BLA, in the United States, or comparable marketing application in another jurisdiction, we cannot predict when, or if, we will obtain regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates in the United States or any other jurisdiction, and any such approval may be for a more narrow indication than we seek. In addition, clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one country does not guarantee regulatory approval in any other country. Approval processes vary among countries and can involve additional product candidate testing and validation and additional administrative review periods.

Commercialization of any product candidates we may develop will also require preclinical and clinical development; regulatory review and approval in multiple jurisdictions, including by the FDA or other regulatory authorities; manufacturing supply, capacity and expertise; building of a commercial organization; and significant marketing efforts.

The success of any product candidates we may identify and develop will depend on many factors, including the following:

 

•

market acceptance of our ELXR and XE technologies;

 

•

timely completion of successful preclinical studies, including toxicology studies, biodistribution studies, pharmacology studies and other studies in animals, where applicable;

 

•

being allowed to proceed with clinical trials under Investigational New Drug applications, or INDs, Clinical Trial Notifications, or CTNs, or other comparable foreign applications for our planned clinical trials for any product candidates we may develop;

 

•

successful enrollment and completion of clinical trials, including in compliance with the FDA’s good clinical practices, or GCPs, good laboratory practices, or GLPs, and any additional regulatory requirements from foreign regulatory authorities;

 

•

positive results from any clinical trials that support a finding by applicable regulatory authorities of safety, purity, potency, effectiveness, and an acceptable risk-benefit profile in the intended populations;

 

•

receipt of regulatory approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;

 

•

establishment of arrangements through our own facilities or with third-party manufacturers for clinical supply and, where applicable, commercial manufacturing capabilities;

 

•

establishment, maintenance, defense, and enforcement of patent, trademark, trade secret, and other intellectual property protection or regulatory exclusivity for any product candidates we may develop;

 

•

commercial launch of any product candidates we may develop, if approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others;

 

•

acceptance of any benefits and use of our product candidates we may develop, including method of administration, if and when approved, by patients, the medical community, and third-party payors;

 

•

effective competition with other therapies;

 

•

sufficiency of our financial and other resources;

 

•

maintenance of a continued acceptable safety, tolerability, and efficacy profile of any product candidates we may develop following approval; and

 

•

establishment and maintenance of healthcare coverage and adequate reimbursement by payors.

 

23

If we do not successfully achieve one or more of these activities in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize any product candidates we may develop, which would materially harm our business. If we do not receive regulatory approvals for any product candidates, we may not be able to continue our operations.

Genetic medicine, and epigenetic modification in particular, are novel concepts that are not yet clinically validated for human therapeutic use. The approach we are taking to discover and develop novel therapeutics using our ELXR and XE technologies is unproven and may never lead to marketable products.

We are focused on developing engineered genetic medicines utilizing our proprietary technologies, ELXR and XE, which are new and unproven. ELXR and XE, which we have developed and are utilizing in our research and discovery programs, have not yet been clinically tested. The scientific evidence to support the feasibility of selection of targets and development of product candidates based on genetic modification technologies is both preliminary and limited. Successful development of product candidates will require us to safely deliver product candidates using ELXR and XE into target cells, optimize the efficiency and specificity of such product candidates and ensure the therapeutic selectivity of such product candidates. We may need to address other safety issues as well, and to demonstrate the potential value of these product candidates, and, in some cases, we may need to achieve these goals with a single administration and demonstrate a permanent correction. There can be no assurance that ELXR and XE will achieve these goals, lead to the development of genetic medicine, or be successful in addressing any or all of these challenges. Additionally, while we currently expect to use lipid nanoparticles, or LNPs, for delivery of our ELXR- and XE-based product candidates, the LNPs we expect to utilize will need to be evaluated as part of the clinical trials of our investigational product candidates.

Our future success is highly dependent on the successful development of our genetic modification technologies, delivery methods, and therapeutic applications of such technologies. We may decide to alter or abandon our initial research and discovery programs as new data become available and as we gain experience in developing gene editing and genetic modification therapeutics. We cannot be sure that our technologies will yield products that are safe, potent, effective, scalable, or profitable in any indication we pursue. Adverse developments in the clinical development efforts of other gene editing and genetic modification technology companies could adversely affect our efforts or the perception of any product candidates we may develop by both investors and regulatory authorities.

Similarly, other gene editing approaches may be determined to be more attractive than our technologies. Moreover, if we decide to develop genetic modification technologies outside of ELXR and XE, we cannot be certain that such technologies will be successful or compete with other existing technologies. Any of these factors could reduce or eliminate our commercial opportunity and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Adverse public perception of gene editing or gene modification may negatively impact regulatory approval of, and/or demand for, our product candidates.

Certain of our product candidates, in particular those using our XE technology, involve editing the human genome and making permanent changes. The potential clinical and commercial success of our product candidates will depend in part on public understanding and acceptance of the use of gene editing therapy for the prevention or treatment of human diseases. Public perception and related media coverage relating to the adoption of new therapeutics or novel approaches to treatment, as well as ethical concerns related specifically to gene editing, may adversely influence the willingness of subjects to participate in clinical trials, or, if any product candidate is approved, of physicians and patients to accept these treatments. Adverse events may occur in our preclinical studies or clinical trials or those of our competitors or of academic researchers utilizing gene modification technologies, even if not ultimately attributable to product candidates we may identify and develop, and negative publicity could result in increased governmental regulation, unfavorable public perception, potential delays in the testing or approval of product candidates we may identify and develop, stricter labeling requirements for those product candidates that are approved, and a decrease in demand for any such product candidates.

 

24

Physicians, healthcare providers, and third-party payors often are slow to adopt new products, technologies, and treatment practices, particularly those that may also require additional upfront costs and training. Physicians may not be willing to undergo training to adopt these novel therapies, may decide the particular therapy is too complex or potentially risky to adopt without appropriate training, and may choose not to administer the therapy. Furthermore, due to health conditions, genetic profile, or other reasons, certain patients may not be candidates for the therapies. In addition, responses by federal and state agencies, Congressional committees, and foreign governments to negative public perception, ethical concerns, or financial considerations may result in new legislation, regulations, or medical standards that could limit our ability to develop or commercialize any product candidates, obtain or maintain regulatory approval, or otherwise achieve profitability. New government requirements may be established that could delay or prevent regulatory approval of any product candidates we may develop. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted, regulations, policies or guidance changed, or interpretations by agencies or courts changed, or what the impact of such changes, if any, may be. Based on these and other factors, healthcare providers and payors may decide that the benefits of these new therapies do not or will not outweigh their costs.

Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome, and we cannot predict the time and cost of obtaining regulatory approval, if we receive it at all, for our product candidates, and the regulatory landscape that will govern our product candidates is uncertain.

The time required to obtain approval for any of our product candidates from the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of regulatory authorities. Clinical trials, if any, may fail to demonstrate that our product candidates are safe, pure, potent, or effective for their intended uses. Even if initial clinical trials or animal studies in any of our product candidates we may develop are successful, such product candidates may fail to show the desired quality, safety, or efficacy in later stages of clinical development despite having successfully advanced through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. There is a high failure rate for biologics proceeding through clinical trials. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and regulatory authorities may not agree with the conclusions we draw from our preclinical studies and clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in later stage clinical trials even after achieving promising results in earlier stage clinical trials.

Further, we or our collaborators may experience delays in initiating or completing clinical trials. We or our collaborators also may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, any future clinical trials that we could conduct that could delay or prevent our ability to receive regulatory approval or commercialize our clinical product candidates or any product candidates, including:

 

•

the FDA, Australian TGA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities disagreeing as to the design or implementation of our clinical trials;

 

•

delays or failure to obtain regulatory allowance or approval to initiate our clinical trials, as well as delays or failures to obtain any necessary approvals from institutional review boards, or IRBs, or ethics committees at clinical sites;

 

•

delays, suspension, or termination of our clinical trials by regulatory authorities, IRBs, or ethics committees;

 

•

modification of clinical trial protocols;

 

•

delays or failures in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and clinical trial sites, as well as possible future breaches of such agreements;

 

•

inability to generate sufficient preclinical, toxicology, or other in vivo or in vitro data to support the initiation or continuation of clinical trials;

 

25

•

failure to manufacture sufficient quantities of our product candidates for use in our clinical trials;

 

•

failure by third parties, including contract development and manufacturing organizations, or CDMOs, CROs, and clinical trial sites to comply with regulatory requirements or trial protocols, or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all;

 

•

subjects experiencing unexpected treatment-related severe or serious adverse events;

 

•

imposition of a temporary or permanent clinical hold for safety or other reasons, such as a result of a new safety finding in a clinical trial on a similar product by one of our competitors, that presents unreasonable risk to clinical trial participants;

 

•

changes in regulatory requirements and/or guidance that require amending or submitting new clinical trial protocols;

 

•

changes in the standard of care on which we developed our clinical development plan, which may require us to conduct new or additional trials;

 

•

the number of subjects required for clinical trials of any product candidates being larger than we anticipate, subjects failing to enroll or remain in our trials at the rate we expect, or failing to return for post-treatment follow-up;

 

•

patients choosing an alternative product for the indications for which we are developing our product candidates, or participating in competing clinical trials;

 

•

the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates being greater than we anticipated;

 

•

insufficient funding to continue clinical trials with our product candidates;

 

•

the emergence of unforeseen safety issues or undesirable side effects;

 

•

clinical trials of product candidates producing negative or inconclusive results, which may result in our deciding, or regulators requiring us, to conduct additional clinical trials or abandon development of our product candidates;

 

•

selection of clinical trial endpoints that require prolonged periods of observations or extended analysis of the resulting data;

 

•

inability to establish clinical trial endpoints that applicable regulatory authorities consider clinically meaningful;

 

•

results or reports from testing conducted by our competitors or others may raise safety or efficacy concerns about our programs; and

 

•

interruptions, delays, or staffing shortages resulting from public health crises.

Clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s, Australian TGA’s and/or other applicable regulatory authorities’ legal requirements, and remain subject to oversight by these governmental authorities and ethics committees at the medical institutions where such clinical trials are conducted. In addition, changes in regulatory requirements and policies may occur, and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to comply with these changes. Amendments may require us to resubmit our clinical trial protocols to regulators or to committees for reexamination, which may impact the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial. In addition, regulatory agencies may require extended follow-up observation periods of patients who receive treatment using gene editing products such as the FDA’s recommended 15-year follow-up observation period for such patients, which will require us to adopt such observation periods for any product candidates we develop if required by the relevant regulatory agencies, which could vary by country or region.

Further, conducting clinical trials in foreign countries, as we plan to do for our product candidates, presents additional risks that may delay completion of our clinical trials. These risks include the failure of enrolled subjects

 

26

in foreign countries to adhere to clinical protocols as a result of differences in healthcare services or cultural customs, managing additional administrative burdens associated with foreign regulatory schemes, and political and economic risks, including war, relevant to such foreign countries.

Moreover, principal investigators for our future clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may conclude that a financial relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the study. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority, as the case may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of one or more of our product candidates.

In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, the termination or suspension of, or a delay in the commencement or completion of, clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate. Any resulting delays to our clinical trials could shorten any period during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates. In such cases, our competitors may be able to bring products to market before we do, and the commercial viability of our product candidates could be significantly reduced. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition, and prospects.

If our product candidates or any licensed products do not achieve development milestones or commercialization in the announced or expected timeframes, the further development or commercialization of such product candidates may be delayed, and our business will be harmed.

We have estimated, and may in the future estimate, the timing of the accomplishment of various scientific, clinical, manufacturing, regulatory, and other product development objectives. These milestones have included and may include our expectations regarding the commencement or completion of clinical trials, data readouts, the submission of regulatory filings, the receipt of regulatory approval, or the realization of other commercialization objectives. The achievement of many of these milestones may be outside of our control. All of these milestones are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions regarding capital resources, constraints and priorities, progress of and results from development activities and the receipt of key regulatory approvals or actions, any of which may cause the timing of achievement of the milestones to vary considerably from our estimates. If we or our collaborators fail to achieve announced milestones in the expected timeframes, the commercialization of the product candidates may be delayed, our credibility may be undermined, our business and results of operations may be harmed, and the trading price of our common stock may decline.

If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, our clinical development activities and our receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.

Patient enrollment is a significant factor in the timing and completion of clinical trials, and the timing of our clinical trials will depend, in part, on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in our trials, as well as completion of required follow-up periods. We or our collaborators may not be able to conduct clinical trials for any product candidates we identify or develop if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or other comparable regulatory authorities outside the United States, or as needed to provide appropriate statistical power for a given trial. If patients are unwilling to participate in our gene editing trials because of negative publicity from adverse events related to the biotechnology, gene therapy, or gene editing fields, competitive clinical trials for similar patient populations, clinical trials in competing products, or for other reasons, the timeline for recruiting patients, conducting studies and trials, and obtaining regulatory approval of any product candidates we may develop may be delayed. Moreover, some of our competitors currently and may in the future have ongoing clinical trials for product

 

27

candidates that treat the same indications as the product candidates we are developing and may develop in the future, and patients who would otherwise be eligible for our clinical trials may instead choose to enroll in clinical trials of our competitors’ product candidates. Furthermore, risks related to patient enrollment are heightened in longer clinical trials.

Clinical trial patient enrollment is also affected by other factors, including:

 

•

severity of the disease under investigation;

 

•

size of the patient population and process for identifying patients;

 

•

design of the trial protocol;

 

•

availability and efficacy of approved medications for the disease under investigation;

 

•

availability of genetic testing for potential patients;

 

•

ability to obtain and maintain patient informed consent;

 

•

risk that enrolled patients will drop out before completion of the trial;

 

•

eligibility and exclusion criteria for the trial in question;

 

•

perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under trial;

 

•

perceived risks and benefits of gene editing or gene modification as a therapeutic approach;

 

•

efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;

 

•

patient referral practices of physicians;

 

•

ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment; and

 

•

proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients.

In addition, our ability to successfully initiate, enroll, and complete a clinical trial in any foreign country is subject to numerous risks unique to conducting business in foreign countries, including:

 

•

difficulty in establishing or managing relationships with CROs and physicians;

 

•

different standards for the conduct of clinical trials;

 

•

different standard-of-care for patients with a particular disease;

 

•

difficulty in locating qualified local consultants, physicians, and partners; and

 

•

potential burden of complying with a variety of foreign laws, medical standards, and regulatory requirements, including the regulation of pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and treatment of gene editing technologies.

Enrollment delays in our clinical trials may result in increased development costs for any product candidates we may develop, which would cause the value of our company to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing. If we or our collaborators have difficulty enrolling a sufficient number of patients to conduct our clinical trials as planned, we may need to delay, limit, or terminate ongoing or planned clinical trials, any of which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

The field of genetic medicines is relatively new and is evolving rapidly, making us subject to additional development challenges and risks. We are focusing our research and development efforts on genetic

 

28

modification using our ELXR and XE technologies, but other technologies may be discovered that provide significant advantages, which could materially harm our business.

To date, we have focused our efforts on developing engineered CRISPR-based medicines through our proprietary technologies, ELXR and XE. However, there are numerous other companies advancing gene editing and gene therapy product candidates that are in preclinical or clinical development. Some of these other companies have previously undertaken research and development of gene editing technologies using other forms of CRISPR protein, or other forms such as base editing, zinc finger nucleases, engineered meganucleases, and transcription activator-like effector nucleases, and at least one of these companies has obtained regulatory approval for a product candidate. There can be no certainty that our technologies will lead to the development of genetic medicines or that other genetic modification technologies will not be considered better or more attractive for the development of therapies. For example, transposons, or “jumping genes,” can insert themselves into different places in the genome and carry specific DNA sequences to specific sites without the need for making double-stranded breaks in DNA, although such methods currently cannot target specific locations.

Other new gene editing technologies that have not been discovered yet may be determined to be more attractive than ELXR, XE, or other technologies we develop. Moreover, if we decide to develop CRISPR-based technologies other than ELXR or XE, we cannot be certain we will be able to secure patents or obtain licensing rights to such technologies. Although two of our co-founders who currently provide consulting and advisory services to us in the area of gene editing technologies have entered into agreements with us pursuant to which they assign to us any inventions with respect to the services they perform for us, such obligations are subject to limitations and do not extend to their work in other fields or to the intellectual property arising from their employment with their respective academic and research institutions. To obtain intellectual property rights assigned by these co-founders to such institutions, such as the University of California, Berkeley, we would need to enter into license agreements with such institutions, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In addition, other companies may use certain technologies to develop product candidates in areas they believe are not covered under our foundational licensed issued patents, patent applications or know-how. There are also a number of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently market and sell products or are pursuing the development of products for the treatment of the disease indications for which we have research programs, using approaches other than gene editing approaches. Any of these factors could reduce or eliminate our commercial opportunity, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Moreover, because the in vivo application of ELXR and XE may involve genetic modification across multiple cell and tissue types, we are subject to many of the challenges and risks that other gene editing therapeutics and gene therapies face, including evolving regulatory guidance governing gene and gene editing therapy products, the potential risk of improper modulation of a gene sequence, and extended follow-up observation periods that may be required by regulatory agencies.

The durability of epigenetic modulation may not translate from preclinical models to humans

Our epigenetic silencing platform is designed to achieve durable modulation of gene expression without permanently altering DNA. While we and others have observed the sustained maintenance from mother cell to daughter cell of targeted epigenetic silencing effects in cell models, mouse models and NHP studies, the durability of such effects in humans has not yet been established and may differ materially from preclinical observations.

Epigenetic modifications are regulated by complex and dynamic cellular processes that may vary across species, tissues, disease states, and individual patients. As a result, epigenetic repression achieved in preclinical models may diminish over time in humans due to endogenous chromatin remodeling, cellular turnover, or other regulatory mechanisms, potentially requiring re-dosing or resulting in a transient therapeutic benefit.

While we have demonstrated two years of durability in NHPs to date, durable epigenetic silencing over multi-year time horizons has not been conclusively demonstrated in human clinical studies for our programs or

 

29

similar approaches. If epigenetic effects in humans are less durable than anticipated, our product candidates may fail to achieve their intended clinical profile, may require additional dosing, or may be less competitive relative to alternative therapeutic approaches, any of which could adversely affect our business, prospects, and results of operations.

Any favorable results we may have in our preclinical studies or clinical trials may not be predictive of results that may be observed in later preclinical studies or clinical trials. If any of our product candidates cause serious adverse events, undesirable side effects, or unexpected characteristics, such results could delay or prevent regulatory approval, limit the commercial potential, or result in significant negative consequences following any potential regulatory approval of such product candidates.

We are developing certain proprietary technologies to support our product candidates. This has and will continue to lead to significant challenges to develop a corresponding set of technical capabilities in support of these technologies. A variety of serious adverse events, undesirable side effects or unexpected characteristics may occur. Such events, side effects or characteristics could delay or prevent regulatory approval, limit the commercial potential, or result in significant negative consequences following any potential regulatory approval of any product candidates we may develop. In addition, ELXR, XE, or any other technologies that we develop may lead to other issues, such as inability to deliver the desired efficacy or safety-related consequences, as it is tested in clinical trials.

Any favorable results we may have in our preclinical studies or clinical trials we conduct may not be predictive of results that may be observed in later preclinical studies or clinical trials. Furthermore, we have not generated any clinical trial results to date. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain regulatory approval of their product candidates. Many product candidates that initially showed promise in early-stage testing for treating a variety of diseases have later been found to lack efficacy or to cause side effects that prevented further clinical development of the product candidates.

There have been a limited number of clinical trials involving the use of genetic modification technologies. It is impossible to predict when or if any product candidates we may develop will demonstrate adequate safety in humans. In the genetic therapy field more broadly, there have been several significant adverse events related to gene therapy in the past, including both the impact of the technology and the delivery methods used to convey the gene therapy technology. These include a variety of safety concerns, including reported cases of leukemia, other cancers, significant morbidities, and death. We currently utilize LNPs for delivery of our ELXR- and XE-based product candidates. Adverse events that could occur with this delivery method include, among others, liver toxicity and/or enzyme elevation, which could limit the effectiveness of the treatment. The occurrence of these events could trigger review and/or monitoring of trial data by a clinical data safety monitoring board or safety review committee, and/or reporting to regulatory agencies such as the FDA, which could result in reviews, delays, pauses, or halts in dosing or enrollment, or require modifications to the clinical trial design. Such actions, in turn, may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. There can be no assurance that technologies such as ELXR and XE or the delivery methods we are using or plan to use will not cause such undesirable side effects.

We cannot be sure that any targets identified or any of our planned delivery methods will not result in adverse effects in the long-term, such as improper editing of a patient’s DNA that leads to lymphoma, leukemia, other cancers, or other aberrantly functioning cells or other as yet unidentified findings. Many times, side effects manifest or are only detectable after investigational products are tested in larger scale, pivotal clinical trials or, in some cases, after they are made available to patients on a commercial scale after approval. FDA guidance advises that patients treated with genome editing products undergo long-term follow-up observation for identification of potential adverse events for as long as 15 years. If additional clinical or long-term follow-up experience indicates that any of our potential product candidates have side effects or cause serious or life-threatening side effects, the development of the product candidate may fail or be delayed, or, if the product candidate has received regulatory approval, such approval may be revoked or limited. It is also possible that serious or life-threatening side effects may cause significant delay or altered perception of any product candidates we may develop, even if we are able to later show

 

30

these effects are unrelated to our product candidates. Any adverse events may cause us to delay, limit, or terminate other planned clinical trials, including any that use a similar delivery method or those that use similar aspects of ELXR or XE, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

A significant risk in any gene editing product candidate is the result of “off-target” edits in the case of genome editing and transcriptional changes in the case of epigenetic changes. Off-target changes outside the intended site of gene modification, or unintended consequences of on- and off-target modification may occur, which could cause serious adverse events, undesirable side effects, or unexpected characteristics. Although we engineered ELXR and XE to reduce the risk of off-target edits, we have not yet conducted clinical trials with potential product candidates for both ELXR and XE, so it is possible that we will detect off-target edits or other unintended consequences of on- or off-target modifications. Current information is limited and we cannot be certain that any product candidates we identified or may identify and develop will not cause off-target editing or that other unintended consequences of on- or off-target editing will not occur and cause serious adverse events in any of our future clinical trials. During clinical development, regulators may require, or we may determine to include, nonclinical studies of off-target gene expression in additional human cell types if warranted by biodistribution findings, observations of on-target treatment-dependent methylation in extrahepatic cells or tissues in future studies, or evolving regulatory expectations. Furthermore, the lack of observed serious side effects in any preclinical studies does not guarantee that such side effects will not occur in human clinical trials of any potential product candidates, which would adversely impact our development programs and business.

There is also the potential risk of delayed adverse events following exposure to genetic modification due to other components of product candidates used to carry the genetic material. These risks also apply to “on-target” mis-edits or modifications that are not intended but occur at the target site of gene correction, which might also have all of the above consequences, as well as future unforeseen adverse effects.

Although we have demonstrated the ability to engineer technologies that are designed to improve the specificity of edits in a laboratory setting, we cannot be sure that our engineering efforts will result in the same changes or improvements in a clinical setting or will not lead to adverse effects. We also cannot be sure that any of our planned delivery methods will not result in adverse effects such as improper editing of a patient’s DNA that leads to lymphoma, leukemia, other cancers, or other aberrantly functioning cells or other as yet unidentified findings. It is also possible that our technologies will result in significant immunogenicity that may lead to adverse effects and could also prevent any chance of reapplication of a delivery method, or gene editing method in the future, if needed.

If STX-1150, STX-1200, STX-1400, or any of our future product candidates receives regulatory approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by such product candidates, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result.

If any of our product candidates receives regulatory approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by such product candidates, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result. For example, the FDA could require us to adopt a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, to ensure that the benefits of treatment with such product candidate outweigh the risks for each potential patient, which may include, among other things, a communication plan to healthcare practitioners, patient education, extensive patient monitoring, or distribution systems and processes that are highly controlled, restrictive, and more costly than what is typical for the industry. In addition to adopting a REMS, we may also be required to adopt or engage in similar actions, such as patient education, certification of healthcare professionals, or specific monitoring, if we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by any product candidate that we develop. Other potentially significant negative consequences associated with adverse events include:

 

•

we may be required to suspend marketing of a product, or we may decide to remove such product from the marketplace;

 

•

regulatory authorities may withdraw or limit their approvals of a product;

 

31

•

regulatory authorities may require additional warnings in the labeling or limit access of a product to selective specialized centers with additional safety reporting and with requirements that patients be geographically close to these centers for all or part of their treatment;

 

•

we may be required to create a medication guide outlining the risks of a product for patients, or to conduct post-marketing studies;

 

•

we may be required to change the way a product is administered;

 

•

we could be subject to fines, injunctions, or the imposition of criminal or civil penalties, or be sued and held liable for harm caused to subjects or patients;

 

•

a product may become less competitive; and

 

•

our reputation may suffer.

Any of these events could diminish the usage or otherwise limit the commercial success of our product candidates and prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved by the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities.

Data from our preclinical studies or preliminary, interim, or topline data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.

From time to time, we may publicly disclose data from our completed preclinical studies or preliminary, interim, or topline data from prespecified analyses from our preclinical studies and clinical trials. Such data are based on analyses of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations, and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, topline, preliminary, or interim results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies or trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline and preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the topline or preliminary data we previously published. As a result, topline and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available.

Data from interim analyses from clinical trials that we may complete are further subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse differences between topline, preliminary, or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects. Further, disclosure of such data by us or by our competitors could result in volatility in the price of our common stock.

In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and others may not agree with what we determine is material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure, and any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product candidate or our business. If the topline, preliminary, or interim data that we report differ from final results, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, operating results, prospects, or financial condition.

If we or any contract manufacturers and suppliers we engage fail to comply with environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

We and any contract manufacturers and suppliers we engage are subject to numerous federal, state, and local environmental, health, and safety laws, regulations, and permitting requirements, including those governing laboratory procedures; the generation, handling, use, storage, treatment, and disposal of hazardous and regulated

 

32

materials and wastes; the emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the ground, air, and water; and employee health and safety. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals, biological, and radioactive materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. Under certain environmental laws, we could be held responsible for costs relating to any contamination at our current or past facilities and at third-party facilities. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.

Compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations may be expensive, and current or future environmental laws and regulations may impair our research and product development efforts. In addition, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of accidental injury or contamination from these materials or wastes. Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health, and safety laws, regulations, and permitting requirements. These current or future laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may impair our research, development, or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations, and permitting requirements also may result in substantial fines, penalties, or other sanctions or business disruption, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Any third-party contract manufacturers and suppliers we engage will also be subject to these and other environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations. Liabilities they incur pursuant to these laws and regulations could result in significant costs or an interruption in operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Genetic medicines are novel, and any product candidates we develop may be complex and difficult to manufacture. We could experience delays in satisfying regulatory authorities or production problems that result in delays in our development or commercialization programs, limit the supply of our product candidates we may develop, or otherwise harm our business.

Any product candidates we may develop will likely require processing steps that are more complex than those required for most chemical pharmaceuticals. Moreover, unlike chemical pharmaceuticals, the physical and chemical properties of a biologic such as the product candidates we intend to develop generally cannot be fully characterized. As a result, assays of the finished product candidate may not be sufficient to ensure that the product candidate will perform in the intended manner. Problems with the manufacturing process, even minor deviations from the normal process, could result in product defects or manufacturing failures that result in lot failures, product recalls, product liability claims, insufficient inventory, or potentially delay progression of our potential IND or BLA submissions. If we successfully develop product candidates, we may encounter problems achieving adequate quantities and quality of clinical-grade materials that meet FDA or other comparable applicable foreign standards or specifications with consistent and acceptable production yields and costs. Our current product candidate and programs utilize LNPs for their delivery modalities, which introduces additional complexities in the manufacturing process.

In addition, if any product is approved, the FDA or other regulatory authorities may require us to submit samples of any lot of such approved product together with the protocols showing the results of applicable tests at any time. Under some circumstances, the FDA or other regulatory authorities may require that we not distribute a lot until the agency authorizes its release. Slight deviations in the manufacturing process, including those affecting quality attributes and stability, may result in unacceptable changes in the product that could result in lot failures or product recalls. Lot failures or product recalls could cause us to delay clinical trials or product

 

33

launches, which could be costly to us and otherwise harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. We also may encounter problems hiring and retaining the experienced scientific, quality control, and manufacturing personnel needed to manage our manufacturing process, which could result in delays in our production or difficulties in maintaining compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. The scientific evidence to support the feasibility of developing product candidates based on this technology is both preliminary and limited, and has yet to be produced at scale.

Given the nature of biologics manufacturing, there is a risk of contamination during manufacturing. Any contamination could materially harm our ability to produce product candidates on schedule and could harm our results of operations and cause reputational damage. Some of the raw materials that we anticipate will be required in our manufacturing process are derived from biologic sources. Such raw materials are difficult to procure and may be subject to contamination or recall. A material shortage, contamination, recall, or restriction on the use of biologically derived substances in the manufacture of any product candidates we may develop could adversely impact or disrupt the commercial manufacturing or the production of clinical material, which could materially harm our development timelines and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Any problems in our manufacturing process or the facilities with which we contract could make us a less attractive collaborator for potential partners, including larger pharmaceutical companies and academic research institutions, which could limit our access to additional attractive development programs. Problems in third-party manufacturing processes or facilities also could restrict our ability to ensure sufficient clinical material for any clinical trials we may be conducting or are planning to conduct and meet market demand for any product candidates we develop and commercialize.

If, in the future, we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to sell and market any product we may develop, we may not be successful in commercializing those products if and when they are approved.

We do not have a sales or marketing infrastructure and have no experience in the sales, marketing, or distribution of any product candidates. To achieve commercial success for any approved product, we must either develop a sales and marketing organization or outsource these functions to third parties. In the future, we may choose to build a focused sales, marketing, and commercial support infrastructure to sell, or participate in sales activities with collaborators for, some of our product candidates if and when they are approved.

There are risks involved with both establishing our own commercial capabilities and entering into arrangements with third parties to perform these services. For example, factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize any approved product candidates include:

 

•

the inability to recruit and retain adequate numbers of effective sales, marketing, coverage or reimbursement, customer service, medical affairs, and other support personnel;

 

•

the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to or persuade adequate numbers of decision makers to utilize any future approved product candidates;

 

•

the inability of reimbursement professionals to negotiate arrangements for formulary access, reimbursement, and other acceptance by payors;

 

•

the inability to price our product candidates at a sufficient price point to ensure an adequate and attractive level of profitability;

 

•

restricted or closed distribution channels that make it difficult to distribute our product candidates to segments of the patient population;

 

•

the lack of complementary product candidates to be offered by sales personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product candidate lines; and

 

•

unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent commercialization organization.

 

34

If the commercial launch of a product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and establish marketing and other commercialization capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our commercialization personnel.

If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing, commercial support, and distribution services, our sales revenue or the profitability of sales revenue may be lower than if we were to market and sell any product candidates we may develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to commercialize our product candidates or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We may have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our product candidates effectively. If we do not establish commercialization capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates if approved.

Due to the novel nature of our technologies and the potential for any product candidates we may develop to offer therapeutic benefit in a single administration or limited number of administrations, we face uncertainty related to pricing and reimbursement for these product candidates.

We expect the cost of a single administration of genetic medicines, such as those we are seeking to develop, to be substantial, when and if they achieve regulatory approval. We expect that coverage and reimbursement by government and private payors will be essential for most patients to be able to afford these treatments. Accordingly, sales of any such product candidates will depend substantially, both domestically and abroad, on the extent to which the costs of any product candidates we may develop will be paid by government authorities, private health plans, and other third-party payors. Payors may not be willing to pay high prices for a single administration. Coverage and reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon several factors, including the third-party payor’s determination that use of a product is:

 

•

a covered benefit under its health plan;

 

•

safe, effective, and medically necessary;

 

•

appropriate for the specific patient;

 

•

cost-effective; and

 

•

neither experimental nor investigational.

Obtaining coverage and reimbursement for a product from third-party payors is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us to provide to the payor supporting scientific, clinical, and cost-effectiveness data. There is significant uncertainty related to third-party coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. We may not be able to provide data sufficient to gain acceptance with respect to coverage and reimbursement. If coverage and reimbursement are not available, or are available only at limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize any product candidates we may develop. Even if coverage is provided, the approved reimbursement amount may not be adequate to realize a sufficient return on our investment.

Moreover, the downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription drugs and surgical procedures and other treatments, has become intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new product candidates such as ours. If we are unable to obtain adequate levels of reimbursement, our ability to successfully market and sell any product candidates we may develop will be harmed.

Risks related to our reliance on third parties

We have entered, and may in the future seek to enter, into collaborations with third parties for the development and commercialization of programs and product candidates using our technologies. If we fail to

 

35

enter into such collaborations, or such collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to capitalize on the market potential of our ELXR and XE technologies and resulting product candidates.

We currently are parties to collaboration agreements with Sanofi and Lilly, and we may in the future seek additional third-party collaborators for research, development, and commercialization of other therapeutic technologies or product candidates. Biopharmaceutical companies are our prior and likely future collaborators for any marketing, distribution, development, licensing, or broader collaboration arrangements. With respect to our existing collaboration agreements, and what we expect will be the case with any future collaboration agreements, we have and would expect to have limited control over the amount and timing of resources that our collaborators dedicate to the development or commercialization of our product candidates. Moreover, our ability to generate revenues from these arrangements will depend on our collaborators’ abilities to successfully perform the functions assigned to them in these arrangements.

Collaborations involving our technology currently pose, and will continue to pose, the following risks to us:

 

•

collaborators have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations and may not perform their obligations as expected;

 

•

collaborators may de-emphasize or not pursue development and commercialization of any product candidates or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on clinical trial results, changes in the collaborators’ strategic focus, including as a result of a sale or disposition of a business unit or development function, or available funding or external factors such as an acquisition that diverts resources or creates competing priorities;

 

•

collaborators may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for a clinical trial program, stop a clinical trial or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials, or require a new formulation of a product candidate for clinical testing;

 

•

collaborators could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with any product candidates if the collaborators believe that competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically attractive than ours;

 

•

a collaborator with marketing and distribution rights to multiple products may not commit sufficient resources to the marketing and distribution of our product, if approved, relative to other products;

 

•

collaborators may not properly obtain, maintain, defend, or enforce our intellectual property rights or may use our proprietary information and intellectual property in such a way as to invite litigation or other intellectual property related proceedings that could jeopardize or invalidate our proprietary information and intellectual property or expose us to potential litigation or other intellectual property related proceedings;

 

•

disputes may arise between the collaborators and us that result in the delay or termination of the research, development or, if approved, commercialization of any product candidates or that result in costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management attention and resources;

 

•

collaborations may be terminated and, if terminated, may result in a need for additional capital to pursue further development or, if approved, commercialization of the applicable product candidates;

 

•

collaboration agreements may not lead to development or, if approved, commercialization of product candidates in the most efficient manner or at all; and

 

•

if a future collaborator of ours were to be involved in a business combination, the continued pursuit and emphasis on our product development or, if approved, commercialization program could be delayed, diminished or terminated.

If our collaborations do not result in the successful development and commercialization of product candidates, or if one or more of our collaborators terminates its agreement with us, we may not receive any future

 

36

research funding or milestone or royalty payments under such collaboration. Furthermore, even if we receive such payments, they will likely result in payment obligations under license agreements with our licensors, which could be substantial. If we do not receive the funding we expect under these collaboration agreements, or if the funding is substantially offset by payment obligations to our licensors, our development of product candidates could be delayed, and we may need additional resources to develop product candidates. In addition, if one or more of our collaborators terminates its agreement with us, we may find it more difficult to find a suitable replacement collaborator or attract new collaborators, and our development programs may be delayed or the perception of us in the business and financial communities could be adversely affected.

As a result of the foregoing, our current and any future collaboration agreements may not lead to development or commercialization of our product candidates in the most efficient manner or at all.

Moreover, if a collaborator of ours were to be involved in a business combination, the continued pursuit and emphasis on our product development or commercialization program could be delayed, diminished, or terminated. Any failure to successfully develop or commercialize our product candidates pursuant to our current or any future collaboration agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

If we fail to successfully research, develop, and commercialize as required to achieve the milestone, royalty, and other payments in our collaboration and license agreements, we will not receive any milestone or royalty payments under such agreements.

Certain of our collaboration and license agreements include substantial milestone and royalty payments in the event we achieve specified development, regulatory, and commercial targets. If we fail to successfully research, develop, and commercialize as required to achieve those milestone and royalty payments, we will not be entitled to such payments. Further, certain of our agreements, such as our 2023 Sanofi License Agreement (as defined herein), provide for nomination, selection, development, regulatory, and/or commercial milestone payments on a per licensed target or licensed product basis. If any of such licensed targets fail to develop into a licensed product, we will not receive certain of such milestone payments and will fail to realize the full economic value under such agreements. In certain cases, our counterparties may also terminate the agreements if we fail to achieve specified milestones, or may otherwise terminate in their sole discretion regardless of the performance of our platform and products. In many instances, our receipt of milestone or royalty payments depends on the performance of our counterparties and we have little, if any, control regarding whether such targets are achieved. In addition to other adverse effects on our business that may result from unsuccessful research and product candidates, any failure to achieve milestones under our current, or future, collaboration and license agreements may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

If conflicts arise between us and our collaborators, these parties may act in a manner adverse to us and could limit our ability to implement our strategies.

If conflicts arise between our collaborators and us, the other party may act in a manner adverse to us and could limit our ability to implement our strategies. Our collaborators may develop, either alone or with others, products in related fields that are competitive with the product candidates we may develop that are the subject of these collaborations with us. Competing products, either developed by the collaborators or strategic partners or to which the collaborators or strategic partners have rights, may result in the withdrawal of partner support for any product candidates we may develop.

Our collaborators could develop competing products, preclude us from entering into collaborations with their competitors, fail to obtain timely regulatory approvals, prevent us from obtaining timely regulatory approvals, terminate their agreements with us prematurely, or fail to devote sufficient resources to the collaboration efforts, including development, delivery, manufacturing and commercialization of products. Any of these developments could harm our company and product development efforts.

 

37

We expect to rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and some aspects of our research, as well as some aspects of our delivery methods, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such trials, research or testing.

We currently, and expect to continue to, rely on third parties, such as CROs, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions, preclinical laboratories, and clinical investigators, to conduct some aspects of our research. For example, we rely on Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., or Acuitas, to supply LNPs pursuant to our development and option agreement with them and on various third parties to conduct some of our preclinical animal experiments. Any of these third parties may terminate their engagements with us at any time under certain criteria. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements, it may delay our product development activities.

Our reliance on these third parties for research and development activities will reduce our control over these activities but will not relieve us of our responsibilities. For example, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial. Moreover, the FDA and other regulatory authorities require us and the study sites and investigators we work with to comply with regulations and standards, commonly referred to as GLPs, cGMPs, and GCPs, for conducting, recording and reporting the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials to assure, amongst other things, that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Regulatory authorities enforce GCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators, and trial sites. If we or any of our CROs, CDMOs, or trial sites fail to comply with applicable GLP, cGMPs, GCP, or other regulatory requirements, the data generated in our preclinical studies or clinical trials may be deemed unreliable, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional studies or trials before approving our marketing applications, if ever. Failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat preclinical studies or clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

Although we intend to design the clinical trials for our potential product candidates, CROs will conduct some or all aspects of the clinical trials. As a result, many important aspects of our development programs, including their conduct and timing, will be outside of our direct control. Our reliance on third parties to conduct preclinical studies and future clinical trials will also result in less direct control over the management of data developed through preclinical studies and clinical trials than would be the case if we were relying entirely upon our own staff. Communicating with outside parties can also be challenging, potentially leading to mistakes as well as difficulties in coordinating activities. Among other reasons that may delay or impact the development of our potential product candidates, outside parties may:

 

•

have staffing difficulties;

 

•

fail to comply with contractual obligations;

 

•

experience regulatory compliance issues;

 

•

undergo changes in priorities or become financially distressed; and

 

•

form relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors.

These factors may materially adversely affect the willingness or ability of third parties to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials and may subject us to unexpected cost increases that are beyond our control. If the CROs and other third parties do not perform such preclinical studies and future clinical trials in a satisfactory manner, breach their obligations to us, or fail to comply with regulatory requirements, the development, regulatory approval, and commercialization of our potential product candidates may be delayed, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval and commercialize our potential product candidates, or our development programs may be materially and irreversibly harmed.

In addition, our CROs have the right to terminate their agreements with us in the event of an uncured material breach and under other specified circumstances. If any of our relationships with these third parties

 

38

terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative third parties on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Switching or adding additional CROs, investigators, and other third parties involves additional costs and requires our management’s time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new CRO commences work. As a result, delays occur, which can materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. Though we work to carefully manage our relationships with our CROs, investigators, and other third parties, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.

If we are unable to rely on preclinical and clinical data collected by our CROs and other third parties, we could be required to repeat, extend the duration of or increase the size of any preclinical studies or clinical trials we conduct and this could significantly delay commercialization and require greater expenditures.

We may also expect to rely on other third parties to store and distribute drug supplies for our future clinical trials. Any performance failure on the part of our distributors could delay clinical development or marketing approval of any product candidates we may develop or commercialization of our therapies, producing additional losses and depriving us of potential product revenue.

We rely on third-party manufacturers and suppliers to supply components for ELXR, XE, and other technologies we develop. The loss of our third-party manufacturers or suppliers, or our or their failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements or to supply sufficient quantities at acceptable quality levels or prices, or at all, would materially and adversely affect our business.

We do not own or operate facilities for drug manufacturing, storage, distribution, or quality testing. We currently rely, and may continue to rely, on CDMOs, including in the United States, to manufacture bulk drug substances, drug products, raw materials, samples, components, or other materials and reports. Reliance on CDMOs may expose us to different risks than if we were to manufacture product candidates ourselves. There can be no assurance that our preclinical and clinical development product supplies will not be limited, interrupted, or terminated, be of satisfactory quality, or continue to be available at acceptable prices. In particular, any replacement of our CDMOs could require significant effort and expertise because there may be a limited number of qualified replacements.

The manufacturing process for a product candidate is subject to FDA and other foreign regulatory authority review. We, and our suppliers and manufacturers, must meet applicable manufacturing requirements and undergo rigorous facility and process validation tests required by regulatory authorities in order to comply with regulatory requirements, such as Current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMPs. Securing regulatory approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities. If our contract manufacturers are unable to maintain a compliance status acceptable to the FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities, our product candidates may not be approved. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, we may not be able to rely on their manufacturing facilities for the manufacture of components of any product candidates. Moreover, although we do not control the manufacturing process at our contract manufacturers and are completely dependent on them for compliance with current regulatory requirements, we are nonetheless responsible for ensuring that any product candidates are manufactured in accordance with applicable laws and regulatory requirements. In the event that any of our manufacturers fails to comply with such requirements or to perform its obligations in relation to quality, timing or otherwise, or if our supply of components or other materials becomes limited or interrupted for other reasons, we may be forced to enter into an agreement with another third party, which we may not be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all. In some cases, the technical skills or technology required to manufacture any product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original contract manufacturer and we may have difficulty transferring the manufacturing of any product candidates to another third party. These factors would increase our reliance on such manufacturer or

 

39

require us to obtain a license from such manufacturer in order to enable us, or to have another third party, manufacture any product candidates. If we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines, and we may be required to repeat some of the development program. Any delays associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates in a timely manner or within budget. In addition, we may not be able to demonstrate sufficient comparability between products manufactured at different facilities to allow for inclusion of the clinical results from participants treated with products from these different facilities, in our product registrations.

We expect to continue to rely on CDMOs if we receive regulatory approval for any product candidate. To the extent that we have existing, or enter into future, manufacturing arrangements with third parties, we will depend on these third parties to perform their obligations in a timely manner consistent with contractual and regulatory requirements, including those related to quality control and assurance. Any manufacturing facilities used to produce any product candidates will be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities, including for continued compliance with cGMP requirements, quality control, quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents. If we are unable to obtain or maintain third-party manufacturing for product candidates, or to do so on commercially reasonable terms, we may not be able to develop and commercialize any product candidates, if approved. Our or a third party’s failure to execute on our manufacturing requirements, to comply with cGMPs, or to maintain a compliance status acceptable to the FDA or other foreign regulatory authorities could adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including:

 

•

an inability to initiate or continue clinical trials of product candidates under development;

 

•

delay in submitting regulatory applications, or receiving regulatory approvals, if any, for product candidates;

 

•

loss of the cooperation of future collaborators;

 

•

subjecting third-party manufacturing facilities to additional inspections by regulatory authorities;

 

•

requirements to cease distribution or to recall batches of any product candidates; and

 

•

in the event of approval to market and commercialize a product candidate, an inability to meet commercial demands for our products.

In addition, we do not have any long-term commitments or supply agreements with any third-party manufacturers. We may be unable to establish any long-term supply agreements with third-party manufacturers or to do so on acceptable terms, which increases the risk of failing to timely obtain sufficient quantities of our product candidates or such quantities at an acceptable cost. Even if we are able to establish agreements with third-party manufacturers, reliance on third-party manufacturers entails additional risks, including:

 

•

failure of third-party manufacturers to comply with regulatory requirements and maintain quality assurance;

 

•

breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party;

 

•

tariffs (including tariffs that have been or may in the future be imposed by the United States or other countries), trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements, trade embargoes, sanctions (including those administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury), other trade barriers (including further legislation or actions taken by the United States or other countries that restrict trade), and protectionist or retaliatory measures taken by the United States or other countries;

 

•

failure to manufacture our product candidates according to our specifications;

 

•

failure to manufacture our product according to our schedule or at all;

 

40

•

misappropriation of our proprietary information, including our trade secrets and know-how; and

 

•

termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us.

Additionally, our contract manufacturers may experience manufacturing difficulties due to resource constraints or as a result of labor disputes or unstable political environments. If our contract manufacturers were to encounter any of these difficulties, our ability to provide any product candidates to patients in preclinical and clinical trials, or to provide products for treatment of patients, if approved and commercialized, would be jeopardized.

We expect to depend on single-source suppliers for some of the components and materials used in our product candidates.

We expect to depend on single-source suppliers for some of the components and materials used in any future product candidate we develop. We cannot ensure that these suppliers or service providers will remain in business, have sufficient capacity or supply to meet our needs or that they will not be purchased by one of our competitors or another company that is not interested in continuing to work with us. Our use of single-source suppliers of raw materials, components, key processes, and finished goods exposes us to several risks, including disruptions in supply, price increases, or late deliveries. There are, in general, relatively few alternative sources of supply for substitute components. These vendors may be unable or unwilling to meet our future demands for our clinical trials or commercial sales. Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for these components, materials, and processes could take a substantial amount of time and it may be difficult to establish replacement suppliers who meet regulatory requirements. Any disruption in supply from any single-source supplier or service provider could lead to supply delays or interruptions, which would damage our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

If we have to switch to a replacement supplier, the manufacture and delivery of any product candidates we may develop could be interrupted for an extended period, which could adversely affect our business. Establishing additional or replacement suppliers, if required, may not be accomplished quickly. If we are able to find a replacement supplier, the replacement supplier would need to be qualified and may require additional regulatory authority approval, which could result in further delays. While we seek to maintain adequate inventory of the single source components and materials used in our products, any interruption or delay in the supply of components or materials, or our inability to obtain components or materials from alternate sources at acceptable prices in a timely manner, could impair our ability to meet the demand for our product candidates.

Risks related to our business and operations

Our future performance depends on our ability to retain our President and Chief Executive Officer, other key executives, and other key employees and to attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel and manage our human capital.

Our ability to compete in the highly competitive biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries largely depends upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific, and medical personnel. We are highly dependent on the scientific and management expertise of Dr. Oakes, our President and Chief Executive Officer and the other members of our management team and other key employees and advisors. We currently do not maintain key person insurance on these individuals.

The loss of one or more members of our management team or other key employees or advisors could delay our research and development programs and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. The relationships that our key managers have cultivated within our industry make us particularly dependent upon their continued employment with us. We are dependent on the continued service of our technical personnel, because of the highly technical nature of gene editing and epigenetic

 

41

modification technologies and of our product candidates, and the specialized nature of the regulatory approval process. Because our management team and key employees are not obligated to provide us with continued service, they could terminate their employment with us at any time without penalty.

We primarily conduct our operations at our facility in Alameda, California. This region is headquarters to many other biopharmaceutical companies and many academic and research institutions. Competition for skilled personnel in our market, and nationally, is intense and may limit our ability to hire and retain highly qualified personnel on acceptable terms or at all. We also face competition for personnel from other companies, universities, public and private research institutions, government entities, and other organizations. Our future performance will depend in large part on our continued ability to attract and retain highly qualified scientific, technical, and management personnel, as well as personnel with expertise in clinical testing, manufacturing, governmental regulation, and commercialization. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, the rate and success at which we can discover and develop product candidates will be limited, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Our relationships with our co-founders may create the appearance of conflicts of interest.

Two of our co-founders, Dr. Doudna and Dr. Savage, are pioneers in CRISPR-based genome editing technology and were key contributors to our founding. While we do not rely on Dr. Doudna and Dr. Savage for our day-to-day operations and they are not currently employed by us, we do continue to consult with them as appropriate on strategic matters. However, each of Dr. Doudna and Dr. Savage may be engaged by entities other than us, and may have commitments under consulting or advisory contracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us, as well as other third-party advisors and consultants.

Following this offering, Dr. Doudna and Dr. Savage will continue to serve on our Scientific Advisory Board and as our paid consultants. Dr. Doudna and Dr. Savage’s existing positions at UCB could result in, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest related to our license of intellectual property rights from UCB and other contractual relationships we may enter into from time to time. Additionally, Dr. Doudna is a co-founder of the gene editing companies Azalea Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, Inc., or Caribou, Editas Medicine, Inc., Evercrisp Biosciences, or Evercrisp, Intellia Therapeutics Inc., or Intellia, and Mammoth Biosciences, Inc., or Mammoth. Dr. Doudna also continues to serve as a scientific advisory board member of Caribou, Evercrisp, Intellia, and Mammoth. While our agreements with Dr. Doudna and Dr. Savage include (i) confidentiality obligations, (ii) a certification that they will not enter into obligations that would preclude them from complying with the terms of these agreements, and (iii) a notification requirement to us if any potential conflict arises, including due to commencement of a new employment, consulting or business relationship or a change in the business interests of other entities which such person advises, these other relationships could still result in, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest to the extent we may be seen as competitors. We do not maintain a separate conflict of interest policy, but pursuant to the terms of our agreements with Dr. Doudna and Dr. Savage, in the event any conflict arises as a result of these agreements, we have the right to modify either agreement in writing. Further, if there is a conflict between these agreements and the terms of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Uniform Consulting Agreement Provisions that each of Dr. Doudna and Dr. Savage are party to, or the Uniform Provisions, the Uniform Provisions shall govern.

We expect to significantly expand our development, clinical, and regulatory capabilities and operations as we grow, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

As of March 31, 2026, we had 89 full-time employees. We expect to increase the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of platform development, preclinical development, clinical development, clinical operations, manufacturing, late-stage regulatory affairs, finance, accounting, business operations, public company compliance, communications, and other corporate development functions, and, if any of our product candidates receive regulatory approval, sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities.

 

42

If we enter into additional collaborations, we may have to further expand our employee base beyond our current projections, which may include further preclinical research and development or later-stage regulatory operations. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational, and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth and with developing sales, marketing, and distribution infrastructure, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources.

Further, we currently rely, and for the foreseeable future will continue to rely, in substantial part on certain third-party contract organizations, advisors and consultants to provide certain services, including assuming substantial responsibilities for the conduct of our discovery programs, preclinical development, any future clinical trials and the manufacturing of any product candidates. We cannot assure you that the services of such third-party contract organizations, advisors and consultants will continue to be available to us on a timely basis when needed, or that we can find qualified replacements. In addition, if we are unable to effectively manage our outsourced activities or if the quality or accuracy of the services provided by our third-party contract organizations, advisors or consultants is compromised for any reason, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval of any product candidates or otherwise advance our business. We cannot assure you that we will be able to properly manage our existing third-party contract organizations, advisors or consultants or find other competent outside third-party contract organizations, advisors and consultants on economically reasonable terms, or at all.

If we are not able to effectively manage growth and expand, we may not be able to successfully implement the tasks necessary to further develop our research and discovery programs or any product candidates and, accordingly, we may not achieve our research, development, and commercialization goals.

Our business depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our information technology systems, and such systems and those of our third-party vendors, contractors or consultants may fail or suffer security breaches, cyberattacks, loss or leakage of data and other disruptions, which could result in a material disruption of our development programs, compromise sensitive information related to our business or prevent us from accessing critical information, potentially exposing us to liability or otherwise adversely affecting our business.

We are increasingly dependent upon information technology systems, infrastructure and data to operate our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit confidential information (including but not limited to intellectual property and proprietary business data). It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. We also have outsourced elements of our information technology systems and operations to third parties, and as a result we rely on and manage a number of third-party vendors and other contractors and consultants who have access to our confidential information. We may be unable to adequately protect our information technology systems from cyberattacks, system failures or outages, and such events could compromise our ability to perform these functions in a timely manner or result in the disclosure of confidential information, which could harm our ability to conduct business, delay our financial reporting, and subject us to significant financial and legal exposure.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our information technology systems and those of our third-party vendors and other contractors and consultants are potentially vulnerable to breakdown or other damage or interruption from service interruptions, system malfunction, accidents by our employees or third party service providers, natural disasters, terrorism, war, global pandemics, and telecommunication and electrical failures, as well as security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, third-party vendors, contractors, consultants, business partners and/or other third parties, including theft, fraud or unauthorized access to or use of our information technology systems, or attack or damage from hacking, cyberattacks or supply chain attacks by

 

43

malicious third parties and sophisticated nation-state and nation-state-supported actors (including the deployment of harmful computer viruses and malware, ransomware, denial or degradation-of-service attacks, software bugs, phishing attacks and other social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information), which may compromise our system infrastructure, or that of our third-party vendors and other contractors and consultants, or lead to data leakage. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyberattacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. We may not be able to anticipate all types of security threats, nor implement preventive measures effective against all such security threats. The techniques used by cyber criminals change frequently, may not be recognized until launched and can originate from a wide variety of sources, including outside groups such as external service providers, organized crime affiliates, terrorist organizations, or hostile foreign governments or agencies. There can also be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our information technology systems and confidential information. Even if identified, we may be unable to adequately investigate or remediate incidents or breaches due to attackers increasingly using tools and techniques (including artificial intelligence) that are designed to circumvent controls, to avoid detection, and to remove or obfuscate forensic evidence. Any breach, loss or compromise of confidential information may also subject us to liability, including litigation exposure, regulatory action or investigation and civil fines and penalties. If the information technology systems of our third-party vendors and other contractors and consultants become subject to disruptions or security breaches, we may have insufficient recourse against such third parties and we may have to expend significant resources to mitigate the impact of such an event, and to develop and implement protections to prevent future events of this nature from occurring. Additionally, any integration of artificial intelligence in our or any third party’s operations, products or services is expected to pose new or unknown cybersecurity risks and challenges. Remote and hybrid working arrangements at our company (and at many third-party providers) also increase cybersecurity risks due to the challenges associated with managing remote computing assets and security vulnerabilities that are present in many non-corporate and home networks.

We and certain of our service providers are from time to time subject to cyberattacks and security incidents. While we do not believe we have experienced any such system failure, accident or security breach to date, we cannot assure you that our data protection efforts and our investment in information technology will prevent significant breakdowns, data leakages, breaches in our systems, or those of our third-party vendors and other contractors and consultants, or other cyber incidents that could have a material adverse effect upon our reputation, business, operations, or financial condition. Significant disruptions of our information technology systems or those of our third-party vendors and other contractors and consultants, or security breaches could result in the loss, misappropriation and/or unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, confidential information (including trade secrets or other intellectual property or proprietary business information) and claims (including class actions) by our counterparties that we have failed to comply with legal or contractual obligations, which could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us.

We cannot assure you that our CROs, contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, or other third party service providers with access to our or our suppliers’, manufacturers’, and employees’ sensitive data in relation to which we are responsible will not breach contractual obligations imposed by us, or that they will not experience data security incidents or other interruptions, which could have a corresponding effect on our business, including under privacy laws and regulations or which could in turn adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the limitations of liability in our contracts would be enforceable or adequate to protect us from liabilities and damage and we may not have adequate insurance coverage to cover losses, or all types of costs, expenses, and losses, we could incur with respect to security breaches or disruptions. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceeds our available insurance coverage, or results in changes to our insurance policies (including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements), could have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, we cannot be sure

 

44

that our existing insurance coverage and coverage for errors and omissions will continue to be available on acceptable terms or that our insurers will not deny coverage as to any future claim.

We are, or may in the future be, subject to stringent and changing obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse business consequences.

The global data protection landscape is rapidly evolving and our data processing activities subject us to numerous data privacy and security obligations, such as various state, federal and foreign laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contractual requirements and other obligations that govern the processing of sensitive data by us and on our behalf, and we may be subject to new or additional obligations related to data privacy and security and face increased scrutiny from regulatory authorities as our business grows. In the ordinary course of business, we process personal information and other sensitive information, including our proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets, intellectual property, data which we expect to collect about trial participants in connection with clinical trials, and other sensitive data. Our data processing activities may subject us to numerous data privacy and security obligations, such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contracts and other obligations that govern the processing of sensitive or confidential information by us and on our behalf, and we may be subject to new or additional data protection laws and regulations and face increased scrutiny from regulators as our business grows. The legislative and regulatory landscape for data privacy and security continues to evolve in jurisdictions worldwide, and there has been an increasing focus on these issues with the potential to affect our business.

We and our partners may be subject to federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations that govern data privacy and security. In the United States, federal, state, and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws, including consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act), comprehensive consumer privacy laws, sector-specific privacy laws, data breach notification laws, laws regarding marketing, and other similar laws governing the processing of sensitive data that we are or may in the future be required to comply with. Certain states have also adopted comparable privacy and security laws and regulations, which govern the privacy, processing, and protection of health-related and other personal information. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020), or collectively, the CCPA, imposes certain obligations on businesses that process the personal information of California residents (including employees based in California), such as the obligation to provide specific disclosures in privacy notices, and affords California residents certain rights related to their personal information, including a private right of action in the event of a data breach. Although the CCPA exempts certain personal information processed in the context of clinical trials, the CCPA could increase compliance costs and potential liability. Similar laws have been enacted in a number of other states, and we expect more states to pass similar laws in the future. While these states exempt some data processed in the context of clinical trials, these developments may further complicate compliance efforts and increase legal risk and compliance costs for us and the third parties with whom we work. Certain states have also adopted specific privacy and security laws and regulations which govern the privacy, processing, and protection of health-related personal information. Such laws and regulations will likely be subject to interpretation by various courts and other governmental authorities, creating potentially complex compliance issues for us and our future customers and strategic partners. In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy groups and technology and other industries continue to consider new or revised self-regulatory standards related to privacy and security that may place additional burdens on us.

Outside the United States, an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards govern data privacy and security. For instance, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, or EU GDPR, and the United Kingdom’s GDPR, or UK GDPR, together the GDPR, impose strict requirements for processing the personal data of individuals. For example, under the GDPR, government regulators may impose temporary or

 

45

definitive bans on data processing, as well as fines of up to €20 million or 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater. Further, individuals may initiate litigation related to our processing of their personal data. Among other requirements, the GDPR (and certain other foreign jurisdictions) regulate the cross-border transfer of personal data, which could make it more difficult to transfer information across jurisdictions (such as transferring or receiving personal data that originates in the European Union, or EU, or the United Kingdom to countries such as the United States which are not considered by the EU or United Kingdom) to provide adequate protection of personal data. Case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union states that reliance on the standard contractual clauses—a standard form of contract approved by the European Commission as an adequate personal data transfer mechanism—alone may not necessarily be sufficient in all circumstances and that transfers must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. We expect the existing legal complexity and uncertainty regarding international personal data transfers to continue, and international transfers to the United States and to other jurisdictions more generally to continue to be subject to enhanced scrutiny by regulators. As the regulatory guidance and enforcement landscape in relation to data transfers continue to develop, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines; we may have to stop using certain tools and vendors and make other operational changes; we may have to implement revised standard contractual clauses for existing arrangements within required time frames; and/or it could adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition.

Complying with these complex and often evolving privacy and security related obligations can be expensive, difficult, time consuming, and subject to inconsistent application and interpretation. Any actual or perceived failure to comply with any such obligations, whether by us, or by our CROs, CMOs, partners or other third parties with whom we work, could result in significant adverse consequences, including: investigation costs; material fines and penalties; compensatory, special, punitive, or statutory damages; litigation (including class actions) and mass arbitration demands; government enforcement actions; requirements to provide notices, credit monitoring or other services to impacted individuals; adverse actions against our licenses; bans or restrictions on processing personal information; required changes to our services, technologies, systems, or practices (or those of our partners); reputational damage; imprisonment of company officials; injunctive relief; and other consequences that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Our business entails a significant risk of product liability and our ability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

When we conduct clinical trials of our product candidates, if ever, we may be exposed to significant product liability risks inherent in the development, testing, manufacturing and marketing of therapeutic treatments. Product liability claims could delay or prevent completion of our development programs. If we succeed in marketing products, if approved, such claims could result in an FDA investigation of the safety and effectiveness of our products, our manufacturing processes and facilities or our marketing programs and potentially a recall of our products or more serious enforcement action, limitations on the approved indications for which they may be used or suspension or withdrawal of approvals. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may also result in decreased demand for our products, termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs, withdrawal of clinical trial participants, injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention, significant costs to defend the related litigation, a diversion of management’s time and our resources from our business operations, substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients, loss of revenue, the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop, and a decline in our stock price. We currently maintain general liability insurance. We may, however, need to obtain higher levels of product liability insurance for later stages of clinical development or marketing any of our product candidates. Any insurance we have or may obtain may not provide sufficient coverage against potential liabilities. Furthermore, clinical trial and product liability insurance is becoming increasingly expensive. As a result, we may be unable to obtain sufficient insurance at a reasonable cost to protect us against losses caused by product liability claims that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

 

46

Our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners, and vendors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other illegal activity by our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners, and vendors. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct that fails to comply with FDA or other similar foreign regulations, provide true, complete, and accurate information to the FDA and other similar foreign regulatory bodies, comply with manufacturing standards we may establish, comply with healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. If we obtain FDA or other regulatory approval of any product candidates and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our potential exposure under these laws will increase significantly, and our costs associated with compliance with these laws will likely increase. In particular, sales, marketing, and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing, and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing, and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs, and other business arrangements. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. Additionally, we are subject to the risk that a person could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal, and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, loss of eligibility to obtain approvals from the FDA or other foreign regulatory body exclusion from participation in government contracting, healthcare reimbursement, or other government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, or reputational harm.

Changes in tax laws or regulations that are applied adversely to us may have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, financial condition or results of operations.

New income, sales, use, or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances could be enacted at any time, which could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance. For example, legislation enacted in 2017, informally titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted many significant changes to the U.S. tax laws. For our 2022 through 2024 tax years, the Tax Cuts and Job Act eliminated the option to immediately deduct research and development expenditures and required taxpayers to amortize domestic expenditures over five years and foreign expenditures over fifteen years. Beginning with our 2025 tax year, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, or OBBBA, restored immediate deductibility of domestic expenditures, while foreign expenditures will continue to be capitalized and amortized over fifteen years. Future changes in corporate tax rates, the realization of net deferred tax assets relating to our operations, the taxation of foreign earnings, and the deductibility of expenses could have a material impact on the value of our deferred tax assets, could result in significant one-time charges, and could increase our future U.S. tax expense. Further, existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified, or applied adversely to us.

Further, we are subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes and other taxes in the United States and will be subject to income taxes, withholding taxes, transaction taxes, and other taxes in any foreign jurisdictions in which we currently do business or may do business in the future. Due to the expanding scale of our international business activities, we may become subject to taxation in additional foreign jurisdictions. Moreover, changes to our corporate structure, including increased headcount and expanded functions outside of the United States, as well as changes to the tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we do business, could impact our worldwide effective tax rate and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

 

47

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

We have incurred substantial losses during our history and do not expect to become profitable in the near future, and we may never achieve profitability. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, as modified by the CARES Act, unused U.S. federal net operating losses generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, will not expire and may be carried forward indefinitely but the deductibility of such federal net operating losses for any year is limited to no more than 80% of the excess, if any, of current year taxable income (without regard to certain deductions) over any federal net operating losses from taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018. Federal net operating losses generated in tax years beginning before January 1, 2018, may be carried forward for up to 20 taxable years and are not subject to the 80% of taxable income limitation. In addition, both our current and our future unused losses and other tax attributes may be subject to limitation under Sections 382 and 383 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, if we undergo, or have undergone, an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in our equity ownership by certain stockholders or groups of stockholders over a three-year period. We performed a Section 382 study which determined that we previously underwent an ownership change in October 2018 that limited the portion of our net operating losses arising before that date. It is possible that we may undergo an additional ownership change as a result of the offering or other shifts in the ownership of our capital stock in the future, some of which may be outside of our control, and which may further limit our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset our post-change income or taxes, as applicable. Similar provisions of state tax law may also apply to limit our use of accumulated state tax attributes. In addition, at the state level, there may be periods during which the use of net operating losses is suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed. As a result, even if we attain profitability, we may be unable to use all or a material portion of our net operating losses and other tax attributes, which could adversely affect our future cash flows.

We or the third parties we depend on may be adversely affected by natural disasters, terrorist activity, pandemics and other events beyond our control, and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.

Any unplanned event, such as flood, fire, explosion, earthquake, extreme weather condition, medical epidemic, terrorist activity, power shortage, telecommunication failure or other natural or manmade accidents or incidents that result in us being unable to fully utilize our facilities, or the manufacturing facilities of our CDMOs, may have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business, particularly on a daily basis, and have significant negative consequences on our financial and operating conditions. Extreme weather conditions or other natural disasters could further disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our headquarters, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as our research facilities or the manufacturing facilities of our CDMOs, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible, for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time, if at all.

Our employees often conduct business outside of any facilities leased by us. These locations may be subject to additional security and other risk factors due to the limited control of our employees. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we have in place may prove inadequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. We may incur additional and substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As part of our risk management policy, we maintain insurance coverage at levels that we believe are appropriate for our business. However, in the event of an accident or incident at these facilities, we cannot assure you that the amounts of insurance will be sufficient to satisfy any damages and losses. If our facilities, or the manufacturing facilities of our CDMOs, are unable to operate because of an accident or incident or for any other reason, even for a short period of time, any or all of our research and development programs may be harmed. Any business interruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

 

48

We face significant competition in an environment of rapid technological change, and there is a possibility that our competitors may achieve regulatory approval before us or develop therapies that are more effective than ours, which may harm our financial condition and our ability to successfully market or commercialize any product candidates we may develop.

The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. Moreover, the genetic medicine field is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, significant competition and a strong emphasis on intellectual property. We will face competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent or other intellectual property protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.

There are a number of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently market and sell products or are pursuing the development of products for the treatment of the disease indications for which we have research programs. Such large companies have significantly greater infrastructure, resources across drug development, large-scale manufacturing, global regulatory engagement, and commercial execution than we do. As a result, they may be able to advance their programs or other competing genetic medicine approaches more rapidly or efficiently than we can, including by initiating or completing clinical trials sooner, investing more heavily in manufacturing scale-up, engaging earlier or more extensively with regulatory authorities, and deploying established global commercial and market-access capabilities. Some of these competitive products and therapies are based on scientific approaches that are the same as or similar to our approach, while others are based on entirely different approaches. Even where competing therapies are based on different technological approaches or involve different design trade-offs, large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies may be able to achieve earlier market entry, broader physician adoption, or greater commercial penetration due to their scale and resources.

There are several companies utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 technology including CRISPR Therapeutics AG, Editas Medicine, Inc., Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. and Caribou Biosciences, Inc. In addition, companies using Cas attachment or novel nuclease technologies include Beam Therapeutics Inc., Prime Medicine, Inc., Tessera Therapeutics, Inc., Mammoth Biosciences, Inc., Arbor Biotechnologies, Inc., and Metagenomi Technologies, Inc., among others. More recently, several companies have emerged focusing on epigenetic modification to modulate protein expression without directly editing DNA, such as nChroma Bio, Inc., Epicrispr Biotechnologies, Inc. and Tune Therapeutics, Inc. We are aware of a number of genetic medicine companies with operations outside of the United States with active cardiometabolic programs, including AccurEdit Therapeutics, CorrectSequence Therapeutics, Epigenic Therapeutics Co., Ltd., Yoltech Therapeutics Co., Ltd., among others. Several additional companies utilize alternative nuclease-based epigenetic modification technologies, including ZFNs, engineered meganucleases and TALENs. In addition, we face competition from companies utilizing small interfering RNA, or siRNA, oligonucleotides, cell therapy therapeutic approaches and LNP delivery technologies to create therapeutics, including Corsera Health Inc.

Our lead product candidate, STX-1150, and development programs, STX-1200 and STX-1400, target genetic risk factors of ASCVD. There are several approved products for LDL-C lowering or cardiovascular risk reduction, such as statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, lomitapide, mipomersen and icosapent ethyl. There are also several approved products that target PCSK9 protein as a mechanism to lower LDL-C and reduce the risk of ASCVD, including evolocumab, which is a monoclonal antibody, or mAb, marketed as Repatha^® by Amgen Inc., alirocumab, which is marketed as PRALUENT^® by both Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and inclisiran, which is a siRNA marketed as LEQVIO^® by Novartis.

We are also aware of one other gene editing program targeting PCSK9 in development by Verve Therapeutics, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company. Additionally, there are other investigational therapies targeting PCSK9, including Merck & Co., Inc.’s enlicitide and AstraZeneca PLC’s laroprovstat.

 

49

Further, several investigational medicines designed to reduce Lp(a) are currently in clinical development. These include pelacarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide licensed by Novartis, olpasiran, an investigational siRNA medicine targeting Lp(a) licensed by Amgen, zerlasiran, an investigational siRNA medicine being developed by Silence Therapeutics plc., and lepodisiran, an investigational siRNA medicine being developed by Eli Lilly and Company. In addition, CRISPR Therapeutics AG and Verve Therapeutics, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, have disclosed programs targeting Lp(a) in development.

In addition, several medicines designed to reduce APOC3 are currently approved and in clinical development. These include olezarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide marketed as TRYNGOLZA^™ by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., approved for familial chylomicronemia syndrome, or FCS, and plozasiran, an siRNA medicine targeting APOC3 marketed as REDEMPLO^® by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and approved for FCS.

Any product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future that are approved to treat the same diseases for which we may obtain approval for our product candidates. This may include gene editing companies with other approaches, as well as other types of therapies.

Many of our competitors, either alone or in combination with their respective strategic partners, have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, regulatory approval processes, and marketing than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and gene editing industries may result in resources becoming increasingly concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. We also compete with these companies to recruit and retain qualified scientific and management personnel. We will also face significant competition in other areas as we approach commercialization of any product candidates, including establishing clinical trial sites, recruiting patients for clinical trials, establishing sales and marketing networks and producing technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer or more effective, particularly if they represent cures, or are better tolerated, more convenient, or less expensive than any products that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market, or may establish more effective sales and marketing platforms. The key competitive factors affecting the success of all of our programs are likely to be their efficacy, safety, convenience and availability of reimbursement, as well as our ability to effectively market our products.

In addition, as a result of the expiration or successful challenge of our patent or other intellectual property rights, we could face risks relating to our ability to successfully prevent or delay launch of competitors’ products. The availability of our competitors’ products could limit the demand and the price we are able to charge for any product candidates that we may develop and commercialize.

Risks related to intellectual property

If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection for our technology and products in the United States or other countries, or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, we may not be able to compete effectively.

We rely upon a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secret protection, and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our CRISPR-based technologies, ELXR and XE. Our commercial success will depend in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and

 

50

other countries with respect to our CRISPR-based medicines, ELXR and XE, and other product candidates and technologies, and their respective methods of their use and manufacture. We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our current or future product candidates, whether those applications are company owned or in-licensed. The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file, prosecute, or maintain all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development in a manner timely enough to obtain patent protection.

In addition, we may not pursue or obtain patent protection in all relevant countries. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents covering our current or future product candidates and technologies throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products, and further may export otherwise infringing products to countries where we may obtain or have patent protection, but where patent enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our products and technologies in jurisdictions where we do not have any issued patents, and any future patent claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from so competing. The effects of geopolitical tensions could significantly limit our ability to enforce our patents in those affected jurisdictions.

The patent applications we own or in-license may fail to result in issued patents with claims that protect our current or future product candidates or technologies in the United States or in other foreign countries. There is also no assurance that all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found, which can prevent a patent from being issued from a pending patent application or be used to invalidate an issued patent. Even if patents do successfully issue and even if such patents cover our current or future product candidates or technologies, third parties may challenge their validity, enforceability or scope, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable. Any successful opposition to these patents or any other patents owned by or licensed to us could deprive us of rights necessary for the successful commercialization of our current or future product candidates and technologies. Further, if we encounter delays in regulatory approvals, the period of time during which we could market a product candidate under patent protection could be reduced.

If the patent applications we own or have in-licensed with respect to our current or future product candidates or technologies fail to issue, if their breadth or strength of protection is threatened, or if they fail to provide meaningful exclusivity for our current or future product candidates or technologies, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to develop gene editing technologies and threaten our ability to commercialize our future product or technology offerings. Any such outcome could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has been and will continue to be the subject of litigation and new legislation. The field of CRISPR-based gene editing has already been the subject of extensive patenting activity and litigation.

In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. For example, many countries restrict the patentability of methods of treatment of the human body. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in countries outside the United States. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets, and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biotechnology products, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our intellectual property and proprietary rights generally. In addition, certain countries do not allow for patent protection regarding methods of treatment.

 

51

Many countries outside the United States also have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner in certain circumstances may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries outside the United States limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we or any of our licensors are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may be adversely affected.

Publications of discoveries in scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed patents or pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. As a result of these and other factors, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or product candidates, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection.

Moreover, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, or become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter partes review, post-grant review or other proceeding challenging our owned or licensed patent rights at the USPTO or patent offices in other countries. The costs of defending our owned or licensed patents in these types of administrative proceedings and litigation matters can be substantial and the outcome can be uncertain. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our current or future product candidates or technologies and compete directly with us, without payment to us. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop, or commercialize our product candidates or technologies.

The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity, or enforceability, and our owned and licensed patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad. Such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products. Generally, issued patents are granted a term of 20 years from the earliest claimed non-provisional filing date. In certain instances, patent term can be adjusted to recapture a portion of delay by the USPTO in examining the patent application (patent term adjustment) or extended to account for term effectively lost as a result of the FDA regulatory review period (patent term extension), or both. The scope of patent protection may also be limited. Without patent protection for our current or future product candidates, we may be open to competition from generic versions of such products. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing, and regulatory review of new gene editing technologies, patents protecting our product candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

Our rights to develop our CRISPR-based technologies, ELXR and XE, and to develop and commercialize our product candidates are subject, in part, to the terms and conditions of licenses granted to us by others.

We have licensed and are dependent on certain patent rights and proprietary technology from third parties that are important or necessary to the development of our CRISPR-based technologies and product candidates. For example, we are a party to the UCB Exclusive License Agreement with the Regents of the University of

 

52

California, or the Regents, pursuant to which we license patents and patent applications that relate to our CRISPR-based technologies. The UCB Exclusive License Agreement imposes various diligence, milestone payment, royalty, insurance, indemnification and other obligations on us. If we breach any material obligation, or use the intellectual property licensed to us in an unauthorized manner, we may be required to pay damages and the Regents may have the right to terminate the license. If the license is terminated, we may be unable to develop, manufacture, sell, or use our CRISPR-based technologies and products that are covered by the patents licensed under the UCB Exclusive License Agreement, and the Regents may allow a competitor to license the covered technology instead. For more information regarding this agreement, please see “Business—Material Agreements.”

Our licenses may not provide us with exclusive rights to use the licensed intellectual property and technology in all relevant fields of use and in all territories in which we may wish to develop or commercialize our CRISPR-based gene editing technologies and product candidates in the future. Some licenses granted to us are subject to certain exclusivity restrictions or preexisting rights. Further, our out-license agreements generally include exclusivity terms limiting our ability to develop product candidates that may compete with the relevant licensed target or product. If such exclusivity restrictions prevent us from developing or commercializing our technologies in a way that we deem necessary to gain or maintain our competitive advantage, it may have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We do not have complete control in the preparation, filing, prosecution, maintenance, enforcement, and defense of patents and patent applications covering the technology that we license from third parties. It is possible that our licensors’ enforcement of patents against infringers or defense of such patents against challenges of validity or claims of enforceability may be less vigorous than if we had conducted them ourselves, or may not be conducted in accordance with our best interests. We cannot be certain that these patents and patent applications will be prepared, filed, prosecuted, maintained, enforced, and defended in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. If our licensors fail to prosecute, maintain, enforce, and defend such patents, or lose rights to those patents or patent applications, the rights we have licensed may be reduced or eliminated, our right to develop and commercialize any of our product candidates we may develop that are the subject of such licensed rights could be adversely affected and we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using, and selling competing products.

Furthermore, inventions contained within our in-licensed patent applications from the Regents under the UCB Exclusive License Agreement were made using U.S. government funding. We rely on the Regents to ensure compliance with applicable obligations arising from such funding, such as timely reporting, an obligation associated with our in-licensed patents and patent applications. The failure of the Regents to meet their obligations may lead to a loss of rights or the unenforceability of relevant patents. For example, the U.S. government could have certain rights in such in-licensed patent applications, including a non-exclusive license authorizing the U.S. government to use the invention or to have others use the invention on its behalf. If the U.S. government decides to exercise these rights, it is not required to engage us as its contractor in connection with doing so. The U.S. government’s rights may also permit it to disclose the funded inventions and technology to third parties and to exercise march-in rights to use or allow third parties to use the technology we have licensed that was developed using U.S. government funding. The U.S. government may also exercise its march-in rights if it determines that action is necessary because we or our licensor failed to achieve practical application of the U.S. government-funded technology, because action is necessary to alleviate health or safety needs, to meet requirements of federal regulations, or to give preference to U.S. industry. In addition, our rights in such in-licensed U.S. government-funded inventions may be subject to certain requirements to manufacture product candidates embodying such inventions in the United States. Any of the foregoing could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects significantly.

Our licensors may have relied on third-party consultants or collaborators or on funds from third parties such that our licensors are not the sole and exclusive owners of the patents we in-licensed. If other third parties have ownership rights to our in-licensed patents, the license granted to us in jurisdictions where the consent of a co-owner is necessary to grant such a license may not be valid and such co-owners may be able to license such

 

53

patents to our competitors, and our competitors could market competing products and technology. In addition, our rights to our in-licensed patents and patent applications are dependent, in part, on inter-institutional or other operating agreements between the joint owners of such in-licensed patents and patent applications. If one or more of such joint owners breaches such inter-institutional or operating agreements, our rights to such in-licensed patents and patent applications may be adversely affected. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may not be successful in obtaining additional rights necessary to commercialize our current and future product candidates and technologies, and even if we are successful in obtaining such rights, if we fail to comply with our obligations under the agreements governing those rights, we may be required to pay damages or could lose intellectual property rights that are necessary for developing our current and future product candidates and technologies.

The field of gene editing is competitive and growing, and we may need to obtain licenses to additional intellectual property from others in order to commercialize our CRISPR-based technologies and any product candidates. We may also need to obtain licenses from third parties covering our product candidates or technologies, or covering auxiliary technologies that are still required for the development and commercialization for our product candidates, such as certain delivery methods. For example, we are aware of certain third-party patents and patent applications in the gene repression space that may be related to our future products that incorporate ELXR. We may find it necessary or prudent to obtain licenses from such third-party intellectual property holders, or to challenge the patentability of claims in these third-party patents and patent applications in re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, derivation proceedings, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings).

In addition, with respect to any patents we may co-own with third parties, we may require licenses to such co-owners’ interest in such patents. However, we may be unable to secure any of these licenses or otherwise acquire the intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify as necessary to develop and commercialize our product candidates and technologies or may be unable to secure such rights on commercially reasonable terms. The licensing or acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a highly competitive area, and a number of more established companies may also be pursuing strategies to license or acquire third party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, capital resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities. In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third party intellectual property rights, that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Similarly, even if we were to obtain licenses or otherwise acquire intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify as necessary to develop and commercialize our products, if, for any reason, these agreements are terminated or we otherwise lose those rights, it could adversely affect our business. These agreements are likely to impose various development, commercialization, funding, milestone, royalty, diligence, sublicensing, insurance, patent prosecution, and enforcement or other obligations on us.

If we breach any material obligation, or use the intellectual property licensed to us in an unauthorized manner, we may be required to pay damages and the licensor(s) may have the right to terminate the license, which could result in us being unable to develop, manufacture and sell products that are covered by the licensed technology or enable a competitor to gain access to the licensed technology. It is possible that we may be unable to obtain additional licenses to such intellectual property rights at a reasonable cost or on reasonable terms. In such event, we may have to expend significant time and resources to redesign our product candidates or technologies, which may not be feasible on a technical or commercial basis. If we are unable to do so, we may be unable to develop or commercialize certain product candidates or expand our platform capabilities, which could harm our business.

 

54

Furthermore, disputes may arise regarding the intellectual property rights that are subject to our such license agreements that may limit the scope of our rights under those agreements. These disputes may include challenges regarding the scope of rights granted under the license agreement, disputes about sublicensing of patent rights to third parties, disputes regarding diligence obligations, disputes regarding inventorship, and/or disputes regarding ownership. Any such dispute will likely be time-consuming and costly, and if we are unsuccessful, may result in a loss of ability to commercialize our product candidates, or may increase our financial obligations.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for noncompliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees, and other government fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and other foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the issued patent. The USPTO and various foreign national or international patent agencies also require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. In certain circumstances, we rely on our licensor to pay these fees and ensure proper compliance with the procedural and documentary provisions, and do not have direct control over such compliance. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Noncompliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of patent rights include, but are not limited to, failure to timely file national and regional stage patent applications based on our international patent application, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we or our licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our current or future product candidates or technologies, our competitors might be able to enter the market with similar or identical products or technology, which would have an adverse effect on our business.

If we do not obtain patent term extension and data exclusivity for any product candidates we may develop, our business may be materially harmed.

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of any FDA marketing approval of any product candidates we may develop, one or more of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, or the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent term extension of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. However, patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, or 5 years from the expiration date of the patent to be extended. Only one patent per product may be extended and only those claims covering the approved biologic, a method for using it, or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. Moreover, even if we were to seek patent term extension, it may not be granted because of, for example, the failure to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, the failure to apply for the extension within applicable deadlines, the failure to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents, or any other failure to satisfy applicable requirements. Moreover, the extension afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or term of any such extension is less than we request, our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following our patent expiration, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially harmed.

Third party claims or litigation alleging infringement of patents or other proprietary rights, or seeking to invalidate our patents or other proprietary rights, may delay or prevent the development and commercialization of our current or future product candidates or technologies.

Our commercial success depends in part on our avoiding infringement and other violations of the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. The intellectual property landscape around gene editing technology is

 

55

highly dynamic and there is a substantial amount of litigation, both within and outside the United States, involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology industry, and in the gene editing space in particular. Potential litigation could include patent infringement lawsuits, derivation and administrative law proceedings, inter partes review and post-grant review before the USPTO, as well as oppositions and similar processes in foreign jurisdictions. As the gene editing field continues to expand and more patents are issued, and as we gain greater visibility and market exposure as a public company, the risk increases that our product candidates or other business activities may be subject to claims of infringement of the patent and other proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties may assert that we are infringing their patents or employing their proprietary technology without authorization, and we may not be successful in challenging the validity and/or enforceability of such third-party patents. Also, there may be third party patents or patent applications with claims to materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment related to the use or manufacture of our product candidates. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending patent applications which may later result in issued patents that our product candidates or technologies may infringe.

Defense of third-party claims of patent infringement or violation of intellectual property rights involves substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of management and employee time and resources from our business. Some third parties may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise funds necessary to continue our operations or could otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, or other interim proceedings or developments, and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Any of the foregoing events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

In addition, third parties may obtain patent rights in the future and claim that use of our product candidates or other technologies infringe upon these rights. If any third-party patents were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover our product candidates, or any aspect of their manufacture or use, the holders of any such patents may be able to block our ability to commercialize such product candidate or technology unless we obtain a license under the applicable patents, or until such patents expire. Such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, we may be subject to claims that we are infringing other intellectual property rights, such as trademarks or copyrights, or misappropriating the trade secrets of others, and to the extent that our employees, consultants or contractors use intellectual property or proprietary information owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.

Parties making claims against us may seek and obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to further develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. In the event of a successful infringement or other intellectual property claim against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, obtain one or more licenses from third parties, pay royalties or redesign our affected products or technologies, which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure. We cannot predict whether any such license would be available at all or whether it would be available on commercially reasonable terms.

The scope of a patent claim is a legal determination made by the courts. It is informed by the written disclosure of a patent, the patent’s prosecution history, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Our interpretation of a patent claim may not be adopted during a patent litigation alleging infringement by our products. If a court does not adopt our claim interpretation and determines that our product candidates are covered by a third-party

 

56

patent, we may be held liable for damages. Similarly, we may incorrectly predict whether a third-party patent application will issue with claims that cover one or more of our product candidates. If our claim interpretations are not adopted by the USPTO during our challenge of a third-party patent application, or by a court in a patent infringement dispute, our ability to develop and market our product candidates may be harmed.

Moreover, we, or one of our licensors, may have to participate in post-grant challenge proceedings, such as oppositions in a foreign patent office, that challenge priority of invention or other features of patentability. If we or our licensors are unsuccessful in any validity (including any patent oppositions) or inventorship disputes to which we or they are subject, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights through the loss of one or more of our owned, licensed, or optioned patents, or such patent claims may be narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, or through loss of exclusive ownership of or the exclusive right to use our owned or in-licensed patents. In the event of loss of patent rights as a result of any of these disputes, we may be required to obtain licenses from third parties, including parties involved in any such proceedings. If we are unable to obtain such licenses, we may need to cease the development, manufacture, and commercialization of one or more of the product candidates or technologies we may develop. The loss of exclusivity or the narrowing of our patent claims could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and product candidates. Even if we or our licensors are successful in such a proceeding, it could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Furthermore, the gene editing patent landscape is crowded and highly competitive. Numerous third-party U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications exist in the fields in which we are developing product candidates, including gene editing, guide nucleic acids, protospacer adjacent motif, or PAM, sequence variants, and gene repression technology, and they may assert infringement claims against us based on existing patents or patents that may be granted in the future, regardless of their merit. Ongoing research and development in the gene editing space is taking place by several companies, universities, and other institutions. There can be no assurance that our operations do not, or will not in the future, infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate existing or future third-party patents or other intellectual property rights. Identification of third-party patent rights that may be relevant to our operations is difficult because patent searching is imperfect due to differences in terminology among patents, incomplete databases, and publication timelines. We cannot guarantee that any patent searches we may conduct are complete or thorough enough to identify every third-party patent and pending application in the United States and/or abroad that is relevant to or necessary for the development and commercialization of our product candidates in any country.

There has already been significant intellectual property activity in the CRISPR-based gene editing space, and we expect that to continue. The extensive patent filings related to CRISPR related technologies make it difficult for us to assess the full extent of potentially relevant patents that may cover some aspect of our product candidates. Even in the absence of litigation, we may need to obtain licenses from third parties in order to advance our research or allow commercialization of our product candidates. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses at a reasonable cost or on reasonable terms, if at all. In that event, we may be unable to further develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates, which could harm our business significantly. We cannot provide any assurances that third party patents do not exist which might be enforced against our product candidates resulting in either an injunction prohibiting our sales, or, with respect to our sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties or other forms of compensation to third parties.

We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our owned or licensed intellectual property rights against others, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe or otherwise violate our patents, the patents of our licensors, or our other intellectual property rights. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file legal claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or our licensor is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result

 

57

in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. The initiation of a claim against a third party may also cause the third party to bring counter-claims against us such as claims asserting that our patents are invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge may be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, non-enablement, written description, or lack of patentable subject matter. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant material information from the USPTO, or made a materially misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar validity claims before the USPTO in post-grant proceedings such as reexaminations, inter partes review or post-grant review, or oppositions or similar proceedings outside the United States, in parallel with litigation or even outside the context of litigation. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. We cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. For the patents and patent applications that we have licensed, we may have limited or no right to participate in the defense of any licensed patents against challenge by a third party. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of any future patent protection on our current or future product candidates. Such a loss of patent protection could harm our business.

We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensors, misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States. Any litigation or other proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights may fail, and even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have an adverse effect on the price of our common shares.

Changes in United States patent law or the patent law of other countries or jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our products.

Changes in either the patent laws or the interpretation of patent laws could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and/or the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. The United States has enacted and implemented wide-ranging patent reform legislation. For example, the United States Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on actions by the United States Congress, the federal courts and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents that we have licensed or that we might obtain in the future.

Similarly, changes in patent law and regulations in other countries or jurisdictions or changes in the governmental bodies that enforce them or changes in how the relevant governmental authority enforces patent laws or regulations may weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents that we have licensed or that we may obtain in the future. For example, the complexity and uncertainty of European patent laws have also increased in recent years. In Europe, a new unitary patent system took effect June 1, 2023, which will significantly impact European patents, including those granted before the introduction of such a system. Under the unitary patent system, European applications have the option, upon grant of a patent, of becoming a Unitary Patent which will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Unitary Patent Court, or the UPC. As the UPC is a new

 

58

court system, there is no precedent for the court, increasing the uncertainty of any litigation. Patents granted before the implementation of the UPC have the option of opting out of the jurisdiction of the UPC over the first seven years of the court’s existence and remaining as national patents in the UPC countries. Patents that remain under the jurisdiction of the UPC will be potentially vulnerable to a single UPC-based revocation challenge that, if successful, could invalidate the patent in all countries who are signatories to the UPC. We cannot predict with certainty the long-term effects of any potential changes.

Any trademarks we may obtain may be infringed or successfully challenged, resulting in harm to our business.

We expect to rely on trademarks as one means to distinguish product candidates that are approved for marketing from the products of our competitors. We have not yet selected trademarks for our products candidates and have not yet begun the process of applying to register trademarks for our current or future product candidates. Once we select trademarks and apply to register them, our trademark applications may not be approved. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks. In the event that our trademarks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition and could require us to devote resources to advertising and marketing new brands. Our competitors may infringe our trademarks, and we may not have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks. If we are unable to establish brand recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, we might not be able to compete effectively in the marketplace and our business may be harmed.

In addition, any proprietary name we propose to use with our current or future product candidates in the United States must be approved by the FDA, regardless of whether we have registered it, or applied to register it, as a trademark. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed product names, including an evaluation of the potential for confusion with other product names. If the FDA objects to any of our proposed proprietary product names, we may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable proprietary product name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe the existing rights of third parties and be acceptable to the FDA.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to seeking patents for our technology and product candidates, we also rely on know-how and trade secret protection, as well as confidentiality agreements, non-disclosure agreements and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties, to protect our confidential and proprietary information, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable.

It is our policy to require our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, CROs, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors, and other third parties to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information concerning our business or financial affairs developed by or made known to the individual or entity during the course of the party’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties, except in certain specified circumstances. However, we cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our trade secrets or proprietary technology and processes. Any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable.

In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information through other appropriate precautions, such as physical and technological security measures. However, trade secrets and know-how can be difficult to protect. These measures may not, for example, in the case of

 

59

misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee or third party with authorized access, provide adequate protection for our proprietary information. Our security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets and providing them to a competitor, and any recourse we might take against this type of misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interests fully. In addition, trade secrets may be independently developed by others in a manner that could prevent us from receiving legal recourse. If any of our confidential or proprietary information, such as our trade secrets, were to be disclosed or misappropriated, or if any of that information was independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position could be harmed.

Furthermore, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws within the United States. We may need to share our trade secrets and proprietary know-how with current or future partners, collaborators, contractors and others located in countries at heightened risk of theft of trade secrets, including through direct intrusion by private parties or foreign actors, and those affiliated with or controlled by state actors. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property both in the United States and abroad. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are sometimes less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If we choose to go to court to stop a third party from using any of our trade secrets, we may incur substantial costs. Even if we are successful, these types of lawsuits may consume our time and other resources. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of their former employers or other third parties.

We employ individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. Although we seek to protect our ownership of intellectual property rights by ensuring that our agreements with our employees, collaborators, and other third parties with whom we do business include provisions requiring such parties to assign rights in inventions to us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed confidential information of our employees’ former employers or other third parties. We may also be subject to claims that former employers or other third parties have an ownership interest in our patents. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. There is no guarantee of success in defending these claims, and if we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Even if we are successful, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to our management and other employees.

Risks related to government regulation

Gene editing and modification, which are novel and distinct subsets of gene therapy, and the regulatory landscape that will govern any product candidates we may develop are uncertain and may change. As a result, we cannot predict the time and cost of obtaining regulatory approval, if we receive it at all, for any product candidates we may develop.

The regulatory requirements that will govern any novel gene editing or epigenetic modification product candidates we develop are not entirely clear and may change. Within the broader genetic medicines field, we are aware of a limited number of gene therapy products that have received marketing authorization from the FDA. Even with respect to more established products that fit into the categories of gene therapies or cell therapies, the regulatory landscape is still developing. Regulatory requirements governing gene editing products and cell therapy products have changed frequently and will likely continue to change in the future. Moreover, there is substantial, and sometimes uncoordinated, overlap in those responsible for regulation of existing gene editing products and cell therapy products. For example, in the United States, the FDA has established the Office of Therapeutic Products, or OTP, within its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, or CBER, to consolidate the review of gene editing and related products, and the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory

 

60

Committee to advise CBER on its review. Gene editing clinical trials may also be subject to review and oversight by an Institutional Biosafety Committee, or IBC, a local institutional committee that reviews and oversees basic and clinical research conducted at the institution participating in the clinical trial. Although the FDA decides whether individual gene editing protocols may proceed, the review process and determinations of other reviewing bodies can impede or delay the initiation of a clinical trial, even if the FDA has reviewed the trial and approved its initiation.

Adverse developments in post-marketing experience or in clinical trials conducted by others of gene editing products, cell therapy products, or products developed through the application of a base editing or other gene editing technology may cause the FDA and other regulatory bodies to revise the requirements for development or approval of any product candidates we may develop or limit the use of products utilizing gene editing technologies, either of which could materially harm our business. In addition, the clinical trial requirements of the FDA and other regulatory authorities and the criteria these regulators use to determine the safety and efficacy of a product candidate vary substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty, and intended use and market of the potential products. The regulatory approval process for novel product candidates such as the product candidates we may develop can be more expensive and take longer than for other, better known, or more extensively studied pharmaceutical or other product candidates. Regulatory agencies administering existing or future regulations or legislation may not allow production and marketing of products utilizing gene editing technology in a timely manner or under technically or commercially feasible conditions. In addition, regulatory action or private litigation could result in expenses, delays, or other impediments to our research programs or the commercialization of resulting products.

The regulatory review committees and advisory groups described above and the new guidelines they promulgate may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional studies or trials, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of these treatment candidates, or lead to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. As we advance our research programs and develop product candidates, we will be required to consult with these regulatory and advisory groups and to comply with applicable guidelines. If we fail to do so, we may be required to delay or discontinue development of any product candidates we identify and develop.

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable, and if we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, our business will be substantially harmed.

The clinical development, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising, promotion, import, export, marketing, and distribution of our product candidates are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and by comparable foreign regulatory authorities in foreign markets. In the United States, we are not permitted to market our product candidates until we receive regulatory approval of a BLA from the FDA. The process of obtaining such regulatory approval is expensive, often takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity, and novelty of the product candidates involved, as well as the target indications and patient population. Approval policies or regulations may change, and the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process, including the ability to delay, limit or deny approval of a product candidate for many reasons. Despite the time and expense invested in clinical development of product candidates, regulatory approval of a product candidate is never guaranteed. Of the large number of biologics in development, only a small percentage successfully complete the FDA or foreign regulatory approval processes and are commercialized.

Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize a biological product candidate in the United States or abroad, we must demonstrate with evidence from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, and to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, that such product candidates are safe, pure, and potent for their intended uses. This process also requires that we demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness of such

 

61

product candidates for their intended uses. Results from preclinical studies and clinical trials can be interpreted in different ways. Even if we believe available preclinical or clinical data support the safety, purity, potency or effectiveness of our product candidates, such data may not be sufficient to obtain approval from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, as the case may be, may also require us to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials for our product candidates either prior to or post-approval, or may object to elements of our clinical development program.

The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities can delay, limit or deny approval of a product candidate for many reasons, including:

 

•

such authorities may disagree with the design or execution of our clinical trials;

 

•

negative or ambiguous results from our clinical trials or results may not meet the level of statistical significance or persuasiveness required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory agencies for approval;

 

•

serious and unexpected treatment-related side effects may be experienced by participants in our clinical trials or by individuals using therapies similar to our product candidates;

 

•

the population studied in the clinical trial may not be sufficiently broad or representative to assure safety and efficacy in the full population for which we seek approval;

 

•

such authorities may not accept clinical data from trials that are conducted at clinical facilities or in countries where the standard of care is potentially different from that of their own country;

 

•

we may be unable to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;

 

•

such authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;

 

•

such authorities may not agree that the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates are acceptable or sufficient to support the submission or filing of a BLA in the United States or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval elsewhere, and such authorities may require additional preclinical studies or clinical trials;

 

•

such authorities may disagree with us regarding the formulation, labeling and/or the product specifications of our product candidates;

 

•

such authorities may disagree with us that our potency assays for our product candidates are adequate;

 

•

approval may be granted only for indications that are significantly more limited than those sought by us, and/or may include significant restrictions on distribution and use;

 

•

such authorities may find deficiencies in the manufacturing processes or facilities of the third-party manufacturers with which we contract for clinical and commercial supplies;

 

•

such authorities may not accept a submission due to, among other reasons, the content or formatting of the submission; or

 

•

the approval regulations or policies of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.

With respect to foreign markets, approval procedures vary among countries and, in addition to the foregoing risks, may involve additional product testing, administrative review periods and agreements with pricing authorities.

Even if we eventually complete clinical trials and receive approval of a BLA or comparable foreign marketing application for our product candidates, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly additional clinical trials and/or the implementation of a REMS,

 

62

which may be required because the FDA believes it is necessary to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks of the product after approval. Any delay in obtaining, or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory approval would delay or prevent commercialization of that product candidate and could have a material adverse impact on our business and prospects.

Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by, among other factors, funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, prevent new or modified products from being developed, reviewed, approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, government shutdowns, statutory, regulatory, and policy changes, the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to perform routine functions. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new biologics or modifications to approved biologics to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times, most recently in late 2025, and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities. In addition, the current U.S. Presidential administration has issued certain policies and Executive Orders directed toward reducing the employee headcount and costs associated with U.S. administrative agencies, including the FDA, and it remains unclear the degree to which these efforts may limit or otherwise adversely affect the FDA’s ability to conduct routine activities. Recent and future changes in FDA staffing, including leadership, could result in delays in the FDA’s responsiveness or in its ability to review submissions or applications, issue regulations or guidance, or implement or enforce regulatory requirements in a timely fashion or at all.

If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if funding shortages, staffing limitations or similar factors hinder or prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, such events could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other such regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may in the future conduct clinical trials for current or future product candidates outside the United States, and the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such trials.

We may in the future conduct clinical trials for current or future product candidates outside the United States, and the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such trials. The acceptance of data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States by the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all. In cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the sole basis for regulatory approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application unless (i) the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice and (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations, and the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. In addition, even where the foreign study data are not intended to serve as the sole basis for approval, the FDA will not accept the data as support for an application for marketing approval unless the study is well-designed and well-conducted in accordance with GCPs and the FDA is able to validate the data from the study through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical trial requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials

 

63

are subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. Conducting clinical trials outside the United States also exposes us to additional risks, including risks associated with foreign exchange fluctuations, compliance with foreign manufacturing, customs, shipment and storage requirements, and cultural differences in medical practice and clinical research, and diminished protection of intellectual property in some countries.

There can be no assurance that the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. For example, for FDA acceptance, we will have to demonstrate that the foreign data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice. If the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities do not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which could be costly and time-consuming, and which may result in current or future product candidates that we may develop being delayed or not receiving approval for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

We may seek orphan drug designation for one or more of our product candidates. We may not be able to obtain orphan drug designation or orphan drug exclusivity for our product candidates and, even if we do, that exclusivity may not prevent the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities from approving other competing products. 

Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. In the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as tax advantages and user fee waivers or exemptions. In addition, if a product receives the first FDA approval for the condition for which it has orphan designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other application to market the same drug for the same condition for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority over the product with orphan exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity.

We may pursue orphan drug designation for one or more of our product candidates. However, obtaining an orphan drug designation can be difficult, and we may not be successful in doing so. Even if we obtain orphan drug designation, we may not be able to maintain such designation. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a product candidate nor gives the product candidate any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process. Even if we obtain orphan drug designation for our product candidates in specific conditions, we may not be the first to obtain regulatory approval of these product candidates for the orphan-designated condition and therefore we may not be eligible for orphan drug exclusivity in the U.S. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may not be awarded if we seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan-designated condition or, if awarded, may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. Furthermore, even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition. Even after an orphan product is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. Our inability to obtain orphan drug designation for any product candidates and/or our inability to maintain that designation for the duration of the applicable exclusivity period, could reduce our ability to make sufficient sales of the applicable product candidate to balance our expenses incurred to develop it.

A Breakthrough Therapy, Fast Track, or Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy, or RMAT, Designation by the FDA, even if granted for any of our product candidates, may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, and does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive regulatory approval.

We may seek breakthrough therapy, fast track, or RMAT designation for some or all of our product candidates. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug or biologic that is intended, alone or in combination with

 

64

one or more other drugs or biologics, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug, or biologic in our case, may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies with respect to one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. Fast track designation is granted for products that are intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the disease or condition. A product candidate can receive RMAT designation if (1) the product candidate is a regenerative medicine therapy; (2) the product candidate is intended to treat, modify, reverse, or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition; and (3) preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product candidate has the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a disease or condition.

Breakthrough therapy, fast track, or RMAT designation is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe, after completing early clinical trials, that one of our product candidates meets the criteria for designation, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. Even if we receive such designation for other product candidates or indications in the future, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to drugs or biologics considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and such a designation does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. Even if one or more of our product candidates qualify for breakthrough therapy, fast track, or RMAT designation, the FDA may later decide that such product candidates no longer meet the conditions for qualification.

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in other jurisdictions.

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain regulatory approval in any other jurisdiction. For example, even if the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority grants regulatory approval of a product candidate, comparable regulatory authorities in foreign jurisdictions must also approve the manufacturing, marketing and promotion of the product candidate in those countries. However, a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from those in the United States, including additional preclinical studies or clinical trials as clinical trials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products is also subject to approval. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. If we or any partner we work with fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets or fail to receive applicable regulatory approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be harmed.

Even if we receive regulatory approval for any product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense.

Any regulatory approvals that we obtain for any of our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved uses for which a product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. In addition, if the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, post-approval monitoring and adverse event reporting, storage, import, export, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for the product will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. The FDA has significant post-market authority, including the authority to require labeling changes based on new safety information and to require post-market studies or clinical trials to evaluate safety risks related to the use of a product or to require withdrawal of the product from the market. The FDA also has the authority to require a REMS after approval, which may impose further requirements or restrictions on the distribution or use of an approved drug.

 

65

The manufacturing facilities we use to make a product, if any, will also be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA and other regulatory agencies, including for continued compliance with cGMP requirements. Any product promotion and advertising will also be subject to regulatory requirements and continuing regulatory review.

Subsequent discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our CDMOs or manufacturing processes, or our failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

 

•

holds on clinical trials;

 

•

restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, withdrawal of the product from the market or voluntary or mandatory product recalls;

 

•

restrictions on product distribution or use, or requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or clinical trials;

 

•

warning or untitled letters;

 

•

refusal by the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications;

 

•

suspension or revocation of product approvals or licenses;

 

•

product seizure or detention or refusal to permit the import or export of products; and

 

•

injunctions, fines or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.

The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit our ability to commercialize our product candidates and generate revenue and could require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could generate negative publicity. The FDA policies may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of any of our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may be subject to enforcement action and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business.

We also cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States or abroad. If any legislation, executive orders, personnel changes, or lapses in agency funding impose constraints on the FDA’s ability to engage in oversight and implementation activities in the normal course, our business may be negatively impacted.

Our operations and relationships with healthcare providers, healthcare organizations, customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-bribery, anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, transparency and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to, among other things, enforcement actions, criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future earnings.

Our current and future arrangements with healthcare providers, healthcare organizations, third-party payors and customers expose us to broadly applicable anti-bribery, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we research as well as market, sell and distribute any of our product candidates. Restrictions under applicable federal and state anti-bribery and healthcare laws and regulations, include the following:

 

•

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, individuals and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the

 

66

purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under a federal and state healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

 

•

the federal criminal and civil false claims and civil monetary penalties laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which can be enforced through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions against individuals or entities, prohibits, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent, knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim, or from knowingly making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. In addition, certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, may also violate false claims laws. Moreover, the government may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act;

 

•

HIPAA, which prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services; similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

 

•

the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of covered drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with certain exceptions, to report annually to CMS information related to certain payments and other transfers of value to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by the physicians described above and their immediate family members, with the information made publicly available on a searchable website;

 

•

analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, that may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; and

 

•

certain state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government in addition to requiring drug manufacturers to report information related to payments to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures and drug pricing information, and state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives.

Efforts to ensure that our current and future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations could involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices, including certain advisory agreements we have entered into with physicians who are paid, in part, in the form of stock or stock options, do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations, agency guidance, or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any such requirements, we may be subject to significant penalties, including civil, criminal, and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, loss of eligibility to obtain approvals from the FDA, exclusion from participation in government contracting, healthcare reimbursement, or other government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, or reputational harm, any of which could adversely affect our financial results. Any action against us for an alleged or suspected violation could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and could divert our management’s attention from the

 

67

operation of our business, even if our defense is successful. In addition, achieving and sustaining compliance with applicable laws and regulations may be costly to us in terms of money, time, and resources.

Our product candidates for which we intend to seek approval may face competition from biosimilars approved through an abbreviated regulatory pathway.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively, the ACA, includes a subtitle called the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA. The BPCIA created an abbreviated pathway for the approval of biosimilar and interchangeable biological products. The abbreviated regulatory pathway establishes legal authority for the FDA to review and approve biosimilar biologics, including the possible designation of a biosimilar as interchangeable based on its similarity to an existing reference product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product cannot be approved by the FDA until 12 years after the reference product is approved under a BLA.

We believe that if any of our product candidates is approved as a biological product under a BLA, it should qualify for the 12-year period of exclusivity. However, there is a risk that the FDA will not consider any of our product candidates to be reference products for competing products, potentially creating the opportunity for biosimilar competition sooner than anticipated. Additionally, this period of regulatory exclusivity does not apply to companies pursuing regulatory approval via their own traditional BLA, rather than via the abbreviated pathway. Moreover, an interchangeable biosimilar, once approved, may be substituted under existing law for any one of our products determined to be reference products in a way that is similar to traditional generic substitution; any non-interchangeable biosimilar products may also be substituted by a healthcare provider but, under existing law, will not be automatically substituted at the pharmacy. The extent of the impact of such substitution will depend on a number of marketplace and regulatory factors that are still developing.

We may face difficulties from healthcare legislative and regulatory reform measures.

Existing laws and regulatory policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of any of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any regulatory approval that we may have obtained, or may face penalties for any approved products, and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

In the United States, there have been and continue to be a number of legislative initiatives to contain healthcare costs. Among other things, the ACA, enacted in 2010, increased manufacturers’ rebate liability under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and imposed a significant annual fee on companies that manufacture or import branded prescription drug products.

Recently there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several presidential executive orders, Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, reduce the costs of drugs under Medicare, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products.

These initiatives recently culminated in the enactment of the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA, in August 2022, which, among other things, requires the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, to negotiate the selling price of certain drugs and biologics that CMS reimburses under Medicare Part B and Part D, although this only applies to high-expenditure single-source biologics that have been approved for at least 11 years (7 years for drugs). The negotiated prices will be capped at a statutory ceiling price representing a

 

68

significant discount from average prices to wholesalers and direct purchasers. For 2026, the first year in which negotiated prices become effective, CMS selected 10 high-cost Medicare Part D products in 2023, negotiations began in 2024, and the negotiated maximum fair price for each product was announced. CMS has also selected and negotiated the maximum fair price for 15 additional Medicare Part D drugs, which will first be effective in 2027. For 2028, CMS has selected an additional 15 drugs, comprised of drugs covered under Medicare Part D and, for the first time, drugs payable under Medicare Part B. For 2029 and subsequent years, 20 Part B or Part D drugs will be selected. Currently, a drug or biological product that has an orphan drug designation for only one rare disease or condition is excluded from the IRA’s price negotiation requirements, as long as the drug is approved only for an indication within that disease or condition. However, as a result of a statutory amendment enacted in July 2025, beginning with the 2028 negotiated price applicability year, a drug may be designated for more than one rare disease or condition and still be excluded from price negotiation, as long as the only approved indications are for such rare diseases or conditions. The constitutionality of the IRA’s drug price negotiation program provisions is currently subject to ongoing litigation. The outcome of this litigation cannot yet be fully determined.

The IRA also penalizes drug manufacturers that increase prices of Medicare Part B and Part D drugs at a rate greater than the rate of inflation. In addition, the law eliminates the “donut hole” under Medicare Part D beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost through a newly established manufacturer discount program. The IRA also extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA permits the HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial years. Manufacturers that fail to comply with the IRA may be subject to various penalties, including civil monetary penalties. While it is unclear how the IRA will be implemented, it will likely have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry.

More recently, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which was enacted in July 2025, imposes significant reductions in the funding of the Medicaid program. Such reductions are expected to decrease the number of persons enrolled in Medicaid and reduce the services covered by Medicaid, which could adversely affect our sales of any product candidate that we commercialize.

The current administration has indicated that it plans to pursue additional policies aimed at lowering prescription drug costs. For example, in May 2025, the administration published an executive order regarding most favored nation, or MFN, drug pricing, which is sometimes referred to as international reference pricing. This executive order directs the Secretary of HHS to communicate MFN price targets to pharmaceutical manufacturers, and if significant progress toward MFN pricing is not delivered, to propose a rule making plan to impose MFN pricing. HHS is currently developing a proposed rule to establish a demonstration model under the auspices of CMS’s Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation that will require MFN pricing, but the proposed rule has not yet been published, so it is not yet known which drugs will be covered, how long the model will be in effect, or how pricing will be determined. If that rule or other MFN pricing rules are finalized, they are likely to mandate reduced prices of at least some drugs in the United States, if they are also sold in comparator countries. The scope, timing, and potential impact of current and future policy initiatives remain uncertain, and accordingly, we cannot predict how such legal and regulatory changes may affect our business, operations, or financial condition. However, if MFN drug pricing is implemented, the U.S. list price of our products that are also being commercialized outside of the United States could be substantially reduced, which could negatively impact our U.S. product sale revenues and the overall U.S. market opportunity. Even if we do not market products outside of the United States, we will be indirectly affected if our products competed with products that are reduced by MFN pricing.

At the state level, legislatures are increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including restrictions or prohibitions on certain marketing practices, reporting of specified categories of remuneration provided to healthcare practitioners, and reporting and justification of price increases greater than a specified level. In some cases, states have designed programs to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, on January 5, 2024,

 

69

the FDA approved Florida’s Section 804 Importation Program, or SIP, proposal to import certain drugs from Canada for specific state healthcare programs. On December 20, 2024, FDA granted an extension of Florida’s SIP authorization for an additional period of 6 months, until July 6, 2025, and, on June 2, 2025, FDA granted an additional extension until November 6, 2025. It is unclear how and whether this program will be implemented, including which drugs will be chosen, and whether it will be subject to legal challenges in the United States or Canada. Other states have also submitted SIP proposals that are pending review by the FDA. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for pharmaceuticals and other healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for any product candidates or additional pricing pressures.

Other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our products.

We are subject to U.S. and certain foreign export and import controls, sanctions, embargoes, anti-corruption laws and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Compliance with these legal standards could impair our ability to compete in domestic and international markets. We can face criminal liability and other serious consequences for violations, which can harm our business.

We are subject to export control and import laws and regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations, various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or FCPA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and other state and national anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which we conduct activities. Export controls and trade sanctions laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit altogether the provision, sale, or supply of any product candidates to certain governments, persons, entities, countries and territories, including those that are the target of comprehensive sanctions or an embargo. Anti-corruption laws are interpreted broadly and prohibit companies and their employees, agents and contractors, from authorizing, promising, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or anything else of value to recipients in the public or private sector. We may engage third parties outside the United States to, among other things, conduct clinical trials and obtain necessary permits, licenses, patent registrations and other regulatory approvals. We or our third parties may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or government-affiliated hospitals, universities and other organizations, such as state-owned entities. Although we currently only maintain operations in the United States, we have not historically had trainings, policies or manuals regarding these laws and regulations, and have not implemented processes to screen and review our actions or the actions of our employees, agents, contractors, or other partners to monitor compliance with such laws and regulations. We can be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of our employees, agents, contractors, or other partners, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such activities. Any violations of the laws and regulations described above may result in substantial civil and criminal fines and penalties, imprisonment, the loss of export or import privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breach of contract and fraud litigation, reputational harm and other consequences.

Detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations of these laws and regulations can require a significant diversion of time, resources, and attention from management. In addition, noncompliance with such laws and regulations could subject us to whistleblower complaints, investigations, sanctions, settlements, prosecution, enforcement actions, fines, damages, other civil or criminal penalties, injunctions, suspension or debarment from contracting with certain persons, reputational harm, adverse media coverage, and other collateral consequences. If any subpoenas are received or investigations are launched, or governmental or other sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal proceeding, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially harmed. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a materially significant diversion of management’s attention and resources and significant defense costs and other professional fees.

 

70

Risks related to our common stock and this offering

No public market for our common stock currently exists, and an active and liquid trading market for our common stock may never develop. As a result, you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the initial public offering price.

Prior to this offering, no market for our common stock existed and an active trading market for our common stock may never develop or be sustained following this offering. The initial public offering price for our common stock was determined through negotiations with the underwriters and the negotiated price may not be indicative of the market price of our common stock after this offering. The market value of our common stock may decrease from the initial public offering price. As a result of these and other factors, you may be unable to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the initial public offering price. The lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your shares of common stock at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your shares of common stock. Furthermore, an inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock and may impair our ability to enter into strategic collaborations or acquire companies or products by using our shares of common stock as consideration.

Our quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate significantly or may fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, each of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate or decline.

We expect our operating results to be subject to quarterly fluctuations. Our net loss and other operating results will be affected by numerous factors, including:

 

•

timing and results of our clinical trials, preclinical studies, or the addition or termination of future preclinical studies and clinical trials or funding support by us, or existing or future collaborators or licensing partners;

 

•

timing and variations in the level of expense related to the ongoing development of STX-1150, STX-1200, STX-1400, any other future product candidate or our CRISPR-based technologies, ELXR and XE;

 

•

our execution of any additional collaboration, licensing or similar arrangements, and the timing of payments we may make or receive under existing or future arrangements or the termination or modification of any such existing or future arrangements;

 

•

any intellectual property infringement lawsuit or opposition, interference or cancellation proceeding in which we may become involved;

 

•

additions and departures of key personnel;

 

•

strategic decisions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments or changes in business strategy;

 

•

if any of our product candidates receives regulatory approval, the terms of such approval and market acceptance and demand for such product candidates;

 

•

future accounting pronouncements or changes in our accounting policies;

 

•

regulatory developments affecting any product candidates or those of our competitors;

 

•

the timing and cost to establish a sales, marketing, and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any products for which we may obtain marketing approval and intend to commercialize on our own or jointly with current or future collaborators;

 

•

our ability to adequately support future growth;

 

•

potential unforeseen business disruptions that increase our costs or expenses;

 

71

•

effects of macro events, such as inflation, geopolitical conflicts, pandemics, natural disasters, tariffs, trade tensions and supply chain issues, on our business and operations; and

 

•

changes in general market and economic conditions.

If our quarterly or annual operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Furthermore, any quarterly or annual fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. We believe that quarterly comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The trading price of our common stock following this offering is likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which we cannot control. As a result of this volatility, investors may not be able to sell their common stock at or above the initial public offering price. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section and the following:

 

•

results of preclinical studies and future clinical trials of any product candidates, or those of our competitors or our existing or future collaborators;

 

•

regulatory or legal developments in the United States or other countries, especially changes in federal or global health policies, laws or regulations applicable to any product candidates, including the review and oversight functions of federal health regulatory bodies;

 

•

the success or failure of competitive products or technologies;

 

•

introductions and announcements of new product candidates by us, any future commercialization partners, or our competitors, and the timing of these introductions or announcements;

 

•

actions taken by regulatory agencies with respect to any product candidates, clinical studies, and, if approved, manufacturing process or sales and marketing terms;

 

•

actual or anticipated variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;

 

•

the success of our efforts to identify, acquire or in-license additional technologies or product candidates;

 

•

developments concerning any future collaborations, including but not limited to those with development and commercialization partners if any product candidates are approved;

 

•

market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors;

 

•

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic collaborations, joint ventures or capital commitments;

 

•

developments or disputes concerning patents or other proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain patent protection for any product candidates;

 

•

our ability or inability to raise additional capital and the terms on which we are able to raise it, if at all;

 

•

our ability to effectively manage our growth;

 

•

the recruitment or departure of key personnel;

 

•

changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;

 

72

•

actual or anticipated changes in earnings estimates, development timelines or changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding our common stock, other comparable companies or our industry generally;

 

•

our failure or the failure of our competitors to meet analysts’ projections or guidance that we or our competitors may give to the market;

 

•

fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;

 

•

announcement and expectation of additional financing efforts;

 

•

speculation in the press or investment community;

 

•

fluctuations of trading volume of our common stock;

 

•

sales of our common stock by us, insiders or our stockholders;

 

•

the concentrated ownership of our common stock;

 

•

expiration of market stand-off or lock-up agreements;

 

•

changes in accounting principles;

 

•

actions instituted by activist shareholders or others;

 

•

terrorist acts, acts of war or periods of widespread civil unrest;

 

•

natural disasters and other calamities, including global pandemics;

 

•

general economic, industry and market conditions, including changes in tariffs and trade restrictions, fluctuating interest rates and inflation; and

 

•

other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the markets for pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have been often unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the issuer. Furthermore, the trading price of our common stock may be adversely affected by third parties trying to drive down the market price. Short sellers and others, some of whom post anonymously on social media, may be positioned to profit if our stock declines and their activities can negatively affect our stock price. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The realization of any of the above risks or any of a broad range of other risks, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section, could have a dramatic and adverse impact on the market price of our common stock.

You will experience immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering and may experience additional dilution in the future.

You will suffer immediate and substantial dilution with respect to the common stock you purchase in this offering. If you purchase common stock in this offering, at the initial public offering price of $  per share, and assuming that the underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional shares in this offering, you will incur immediate dilution of $  per share, representing the difference between the initial public offering price of $  per share and our pro forma net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2026, after giving effect to this offering and the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock to common stock upon the completion of this offering.

For a further description of the dilution you will experience immediately after this offering, see the section titled “Dilution.”

 

73

A sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Based on the shares outstanding as of March 31, 2026, upon completion of this offering, we will have a total of      shares of common stock outstanding. Of these shares, only      shares of common stock sold in this offering, or      shares if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, will be freely tradable, without restriction, in the public market immediately after this offering. Each of our officers, directors and holders of substantially all of our outstanding equity securities have entered into lock-up agreements with the underwriters that restrict their ability to sell or transfer their shares. The lock-up agreements pertaining to this offering will expire 180 days from the date of this prospectus. However, Leerink Partners LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC may, in their sole discretion, permit our officers, directors and other current stockholders who are subject to the contractual lock-up to sell shares prior to the expiration of the lock-up agreements. After the lock-up agreements expire, the shares of common stock subject to these lock-up agreements will be eligible for sale in the public market, unless held by our officers, directors and their affiliated entities, in which case such shares will be subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.

After this offering, the holders of an aggregate of      shares of our outstanding common stock as of March 31, 2026, will have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or our stockholders. We also intend to register shares of common stock that we may issue under our equity incentive plans. Once we register these shares, they will be able to be sold freely in the public market upon issuance, subject to the 180-day lock-up period under the lock-up agreements described above and in the section titled “Underwriting.”

We cannot predict what effect, if any, sales of our shares in the public market or the availability of shares for sale will have on the market price of our common stock. However, future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, including shares issued upon exercise of our outstanding options, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We also expect that significant additional capital may be needed in the future to continue our planned operations. To raise capital, we may sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale and issuance of shares of common stock or other securities convertible into shares of common stock, our stockholders will be diluted. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares of common stock, could reduce the market price of our common stock.

We will have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.

Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering, including for any of the purposes described in the section titled “Use of Proceeds,” and you will be relying on the judgment of our management regarding the application of these net proceeds. You will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether we are using the net proceeds appropriately. Our management might not apply our net proceeds in ways that ultimately increase the value of your investment. If we do not invest or apply the net proceeds from this offering in ways that enhance stockholder value, we may fail to achieve expected financial results, which could cause our stock price to decline. Pending their use, we may invest the net proceeds from this offering in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

Our principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of our common stock and will be able to control matters subject to stockholder approval.

Based on the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2026, prior to this offering, our executive officers, directors, holders of 5% or more of our capital stock and their respective affiliates beneficially

 

74

owned approximately  % of our voting stock and, upon the completion of this offering, that same group will hold approximately  % of our outstanding voting stock (assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, no exercise of our outstanding options and no purchases of shares of common stock in this offering by anyone of this group). The interests of these stockholders may not be the same as or may even conflict with your interests. For example, these stockholders could delay or prevent a change of control of our Company, even if such a change of control would benefit our other stockholders, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our Company or our assets and might affect the prevailing market price of our common stock. The significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, our stockholders’ ability to achieve a return on their investment will depend on appreciation of the value of our common stock.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. As a result, any investment return on our common stock will depend upon increases in the value for our common stock, which is not certain.

We are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including (i) being permitted to present only two years of audited financial statements, in addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements, with correspondingly reduced “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure in this prospectus; (ii) reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements; (iii) not being required to hold advisory votes on executive compensation or to obtain stockholder approval of any golden parachute arrangements not previously approved; (iv) an exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and (v) an exemption from compliance with the requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the communication of critical audit matters in the auditor’s report on the financial statements.

We may take advantage of these exemptions for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We would cease to be an emerging growth company on the date that is the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenues of $1.235 billion or more; (ii) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the completion of this offering; (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt during the previous three years; or (iv) the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the rules of the SEC.

We have taken advantage of reduced reporting requirements in this prospectus. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different from the information you receive from other public companies in which you hold stock. Additionally, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption and, therefore, while we are an emerging growth company, we will not be subject to new or revised accounting standards at the same time that they become applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. As a result

 

75

of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to those of other public companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates. We may choose to early adopt any new or revised accounting standards whenever such early adoption is permitted for private companies. Until the date that we are no longer an “emerging growth company” or affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the exemption provided by Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act, upon issuance of a new or revised accounting standard that applies to our financial statements and that has a different effective date for public and private companies, we will disclose the date on which adoption is required for non-emerging growth companies and the date on which we will adopt the recently issued accounting standard.

We are also a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates plus the proposed aggregate amount of gross proceeds to us as a result of this offering is less than $700.0 million and our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company after this offering if either (i) the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million. If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an emerging growth company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements, we are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and, similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

If we fail to establish and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, investors’ views of us and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting within our Annual Report on Form 10-K. However, while we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that will need to be frequently evaluated. Our failure to maintain the effectiveness of our internal controls in accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business. If we identify one or more material weaknesses, it could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. In addition, if we are not able to continue to meet these requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on Nasdaq.

As we grow, we expect to hire additional personnel and may utilize external temporary resources to implement, document and modify policies and procedures to maintain effective internal controls. However, it is possible that we may identify deficiencies and weaknesses in our internal controls. If material weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal controls exist and go undetected or unremediated, our financial statements could contain material misstatements that, when discovered in the future, could cause us to fail to meet our future reporting obligations and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

Upon the completion of this offering, we will become subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. We designed our disclosure controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules

 

76

and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. For example, our directors or executive officers could inadvertently fail to disclose a new relationship or arrangement causing us to fail to make any related party transaction disclosures. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. In addition, we do not have a formal risk management program for identifying and addressing risks to our business in other areas.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could prevent or delay an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws that will be in effect upon completion of this offering contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control of our Company. These provisions could also make it difficult for stockholders to elect directors who are not nominated by current members of our board of directors or take other corporate actions, including effecting changes in our management. These provisions:

 

•

establish a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board are elected at one time;

 

•

permit only the board of directors to establish the number of directors and fill vacancies on the board;

 

•

provide that directors may only be removed “for cause” and only with the approval of two-thirds of our stockholders;

 

•

require super-majority voting to amend some provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws;

 

•

authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that our board of directors could use to implement a stockholder rights plan;

 

•

eliminate the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;

 

•

prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;

 

•

prohibit cumulative voting; and

 

•

establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at annual stockholder meetings.

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our Company. Section 203 imposes certain restrictions on mergers, business combinations and other transactions between us and holders of 15% or more of our common stock.

The exclusive forum provisions in our organizational documents may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, or employees, or the underwriters of any offering giving rise to such claim, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims.

Our amended and restated bylaws that will be in effect upon completion of this offering, to the fullest extent permitted by law, will provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for: any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty;

 

77

any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the DGCL, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or our amended and restated bylaws; or any action asserting a claim that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act. It could apply, however, to a suit that falls within one or more of the categories enumerated in the exclusive forum provision. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, or other employees, or the underwriters of any offering giving rise to such claims, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provisions contained in our amended and restated bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that the federal district courts of the United States will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, or the Federal Forum Provision, including for all causes of action asserted against any defendant named in such complaint. For the avoidance of doubt, this provision is intended to benefit and may be enforced by us, our officers and directors, the underwriters to any offering giving rise to such complaint, and any other professional person or entity whose profession gives authority to a statement made by that person or entity and who has prepared or certified any part of the documents underlying the offering. Our decision to adopt a Federal Forum Provision followed a decision by the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware holding that such provisions are facially valid under Delaware law. While federal or other state courts may not follow the holding of the Delaware Supreme Court or may determine that the Federal Forum Provision should be enforced in a particular case, application of the Federal Forum Provision means that suits brought by our stockholders to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act must be brought in federal court and cannot be brought in state court, and our stockholders cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. In addition, neither the exclusive forum provision nor the Federal Forum Provision applies to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. Accordingly, actions by our stockholders to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder must be brought in federal court, and our stockholders cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in any of our securities shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to our exclusive forum provisions, including the Federal Forum Provision. These provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim, and may result in increased costs for a stockholder to bring such a claim, in a judicial forum of their choosing for disputes with us or our directors, officers, other employees, or agents, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, other employees, or agents.

General risk factors

Unfavorable macroeconomic conditions or market volatility resulting from geopolitical developments or national or global economic conditions, including those affecting the financial services industry, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Adverse macroeconomic conditions or market volatility resulting from national or global economic developments, political unrest, high inflation, rising interest rates, international tariffs, changes in international trade relationships and military conflicts, such as the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, recent military conflicts and geopolitical instability in the Middle East, the potential for significant changes in U.S. policies or

 

78

regulatory environment, or other factors, could materially and adversely affect our business operations. Sanctions imposed by the U.S. and other countries in response to such conflicts may also continue to adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others could exacerbate market and economic instability. Tariffs levied by the U.S. and other countries also may adversely affect financial markets and the global economy. There can be no assurance that further deterioration in credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur. For instance, actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. Investor concerns regarding the U.S. or international financial systems could result in less favorable commercial financing terms, including higher interest rates or costs and tighter financial and operating covenants, or systemic limitations on access to credit and liquidity sources, thereby making it more difficult for us to acquire financing on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, any further deterioration in the macroeconomic economy or financial services industry could lead to losses or defaults by our suppliers, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our current and/or planned business operations and our current or projected results of operations and financial condition. For example, there has been recent U.S. legislation that may restrict the ability of U.S. biopharmaceutical companies to purchase services or products from, or otherwise collaborate with, certain Chinese biotechnology companies of concern without losing the ability to contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. We continue to assess the law to determine whether it could have an effect on our contractual relationships. Also, current inflationary trends in the global economy may impact salaries and wages, costs of goods and transportation expenses, among other things, and recent and potential future disruptions in access to bank deposits or lending commitments due to bank failures may create market and economic instability.

A severe or prolonged economic downturn or additional global financial crises could result in a variety of risks to our business, including weakened demand for any product candidates we develop or our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all.

Further, U.S. government appropriations have been affected by larger U.S. government budgetary issues and related legislation. In addition, in the past, U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns have increased the possibility of additional credit-rating downgrades and economic slowdowns, or a recession in the U.S. Although U.S. lawmakers passed legislation to raise the federal debt ceiling on multiple occasions, ratings agencies have lowered or threatened to lower the long-term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. The impact of this or any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating or its perceived creditworthiness could adversely affect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. As a result, government spending levels are difficult to predict beyond the near term due to numerous factors, including the external threat environment, future government priorities and the state of government finances. Significant changes in government spending or changes in U.S. government priorities, policies and requirements could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over the industry or securities analysts, or the content and opinions included in their reports. We do not currently have and may never obtain research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If no or few securities or industry analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price for our common stock could be impacted negatively. In the event we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage, if any of the analysts who cover us issue an adverse or misleading

 

79

opinion regarding us, our business model, our intellectual property or our stock performance, or if our preclinical studies and clinical trials and operating results fail to meet the expectations of analysts, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of such analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause a decline in our stock price or trading volume.

We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.

As a public company, and particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company or smaller reporting company, we will incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, we expect these rules and regulations to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain sufficient coverage. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers. The increased costs may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business. Moreover, these rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.

We may be subject to securities litigation, which is expensive and could divert management attention.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile. The stock market in general, and Nasdaq and biopharmaceutical companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

 

80

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “believe,” “may,” “will,” “potentially,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “plan,” “expect” and similar expressions that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. Moreover, we operate in a competitive and rapidly changing environment, and new risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this prospectus may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements in this prospectus include, among other things, statements about:

 

•

our ability to advance our lead product candidate, STX-1150, and our developmental programs STX-1200 and STX-1400 to address the key drivers of ASCVD;

 

•

our plans to engineer, develop and commercialize potential genetic medicines with our proprietary CRISPR-based technologies, ELXR and XE;

 

•

our ability to leverage ELXR and XE to efficiently produce product candidates at a rapid pace and continuously advance our genetic modification platforms;

 

•

our expectations regarding collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, including our ability to reach development milestones under such agreements;

 

•

estimates of the addressable market for our potential genetic medicines and any future product candidates and the therapeutic impact of our potential genetic medicines;

 

•

our expectations regarding demand for, and market acceptance of, our potential genetic medicines and platforms;

 

•

our ability to market or commercialize any product candidates we may develop and to compete effectively with existing competitors and new market entrants;

 

•

the potential effects of extensive government regulations relating to the genetic medicine industry;

 

•

our ability to obtain, maintain, protect and enforce intellectual property and proprietary rights;

 

•

our ability to operate our business without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights and proprietary technology of third parties;

 

•

our ability to attract and retain key management and technical personnel;

 

•

general economic, industry and market conditions, including fluctuating interest rates and inflation, cybersecurity incidents, significant political, trade or regulatory developments, including tariffs or shifting priorities within the FDA, and global and regional conflicts on our operations and the receipt and timing of potential regulatory designations;

 

•

our ability to continue as a going concern;

 

•

our expectations regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and our needs for additional financing; and

 

•

our expected use of the net proceeds from this offering and our existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments.

 

81

We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this prospectus.

The forward-looking statements made in this prospectus relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this prospectus. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this prospectus to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by law.

You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances may be materially different from what we expect.

In addition, statements that “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this prospectus, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain and you are cautioned not to unduly rely upon these statements.

 

82

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA

This prospectus contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to our industry and the markets in which we operate, including our general expectations and market position, market opportunity, the incidence of certain medical conditions and other industry data. In some cases, we do not expressly refer to the sources from which these data are derived. These data, to the extent they contain estimates or projections, involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates or projections. Industry publications and other reports we have obtained from independent parties may state that the data contained in these publications or other reports have been obtained in good faith or from sources considered to be reliable, but they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such data. The industry in which we operate is subject to risks and uncertainties due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section titled “Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in these publications and reports. The content of these third-party sources, except to the extent specifically set forth in this prospectus, does not constitute a portion of this prospectus and is not incorporated herein.

 

83

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $   million, or approximately $   million if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of our common stock from us in full, assuming an initial public offering price of $   per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $   per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease, as applicable, the net proceeds to us from this offering by $   million, assuming the number of shares offered, as set forth on the cover of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Similarly, each increase or decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares of our common stock offered would increase or decrease, as applicable, the net proceeds that we receive from this offering by $   million, assuming that the assumed initial public offering price remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The principal purposes of this offering are to increase our financial flexibility, create a public market for our common stock and to facilitate our access to the public equity markets. We currently intend to use the net proceeds we receive from this offering, together with our existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments as follows:

 

•

approximately $    million to advance the development of our lead product candidate, STX-1150, through    ;

 

•

approximately $    million to advance the development of our additional product candidates, STX-1200 and STX-1400, through     ;

 

•

approximately $    million for continued investment in our additional pipeline programs as well as associated CRISPR-based technologies, ELXR and XE, development of new technologies and development of our internal pipeline; and

 

•

the remainder for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to in-license, acquire, or invest in complementary technologies, assets, manufacturing capabilities, or intellectual property. We periodically evaluate strategic opportunities; however, we have no current commitments to enter into any such acquisitions or make any such investments.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments, together with the net proceeds from this offering, will be sufficient for us to fund our operations and capital expenses through     . We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we expect. All of our programs are currently in the preclinical or clinical stage of development. The expected use of the net proceeds from this offering represents our intentions based upon our current plans and business conditions, which could change in the future as our plans and business conditions evolve. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with research, development, and commercialization of pharmaceutical drugs, we are unable to estimate the exact amount of our working capital requirements or the funds necessary to support our operations. As a result, our management will retain broad discretion over the allocation of the net proceeds from this offering. We expect the net proceeds from this offering, together with our existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments, will not be sufficient for us to advance any of our programs through regulatory approval, and following this offering, we will need substantial additional capital to complete the development and commercialization of any of our programs. Therefore, we will need to raise additional capital to complete the development and potential commercialization of any of our programs.

 

84

Pending the uses described above, we intend to invest the net proceeds from this offering in short term, investment-grade interest-bearing securities such as money market accounts, certificates of deposit, commercial paper and guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.

 

85

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Our ability to pay cash dividends on our capital stock in the future may also be limited by any restrictions contained in any future financing instruments or by the terms of any preferred securities we may issue or agreements governing any indebtedness we may incur.

 

86

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents, and investments and capitalization as of March 31, 2026:

 

•

on an actual basis;

 

•

on a pro forma basis, giving effect to (i) the Preferred Stock Conversion, (ii) the Warrant Conversion, (iii) the Note Conversion and (iv) the filing and effectiveness of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation; and

 

•

on a pro forma as adjusted basis giving effect to (i) the pro forma adjustments described above, and (ii) the sale and issuance by us of      shares of our common stock in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $   per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The pro forma as adjusted information set forth below is illustrative only and will be adjusted based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

You should read this table together with the sections titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the related notes, each included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

		As of March 31, 2026
		Actual				Pro  Forma				Pro Forma As Adjusted
		(unaudited)
		(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Cash, cash equivalents and investments		$	49,731			$				$
Convertible note			40,546
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; 29,182,118 shares authorized, 29,107,492 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares authorized, issued and outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted			120,356
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; no shares authorized, issued and outstanding, actual; shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted			—				—
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 52,000,000 shares authorized, 14,616,718 shares issued and outstanding, actual;     shares authorized, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted;     shares issued and outstanding, pro forma;     shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted			14
Additional paid-in capital			16,302
Accumulated deficit			(175,054	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income			—
Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity			(158,738	)
Total capitalization		$	51,895			$				$

 

87

If the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares is exercised in full, our pro forma as adjusted cash, cash equivalents, and investments, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders’ (deficit) equity and total capitalization as of March 31, 2026, would be $   million, $   million, $   million, and $   million, respectively.

Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $   per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease, as applicable, each of our pro forma as adjusted cash, cash equivalents, and investments, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders’ (deficit) equity and total capitalization by approximately $   million, assuming that the number of shares offered, as set forth on the cover of this prospectus, remains the same. Similarly, each increase or decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares of our common stock offered in this offering would increase or decrease, as applicable, each of our pro forma as adjusted cash, cash equivalents, and investments, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders’ (deficit) equity and total capitalization by approximately $   million, assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same.

The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering on a pro forma and pro forma as adjusted basis is based on 14,616,718 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2026 (including      shares of unvested restricted common stock subject to repurchase and after giving effect to (i) the Preferred Stock Conversion, (ii) the Warrant Conversion and (iii) the Note Conversion) and excludes:

 

•

6,993,919 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2026 under the 2018 Plan, at a weighted-average exercise price of $1.21 per share;

 

•

shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock granted after March 31, 2026 under our 2018 Plan, with a weighted-average exercise price of $   per share; and

 

•

shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans, consisting of:

 

•

9,904,452 shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2018 Plan as of March 31, 2026, which shares will become available under the 2026 Plan upon its effectiveness,

 

•

shares of our common stock to be reserved for future issuance under the 2026 Plan, which will become effective immediately prior to the date of the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and

 

•

shares of our common stock to be reserved for future issuance under the ESPP, which will become effective immediately prior to the date of the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Our 2026 Plan and our ESPP provide for automatic annual increases in the number of shares of our common stock reserved thereunder, and our 2026 Plan provides for increases to the number of shares that may be granted thereunder based on shares under our 2018 Plan that expire, are tendered to or withheld by us for payment of an exercise price or for satisfying tax withholding obligations or are forfeited or otherwise repurchased by us. See the section titled “Executive compensation—Equity compensation plans and other benefit plans” for additional information.

 

88

DILUTION

If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your ownership interest will be immediately diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock in this offering and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering.

Net tangible book value per share is determined by dividing our total tangible assets (which excludes deferred offering costs) less our total liabilities and redeemable convertible preferred stock by the number of shares of our common stock outstanding. Our historical net tangible book deficit as of March 31, 2026 was $161.0 million, or $11.01 per share, based on 14,616,718 shares of our common stock outstanding as of that date.

Our pro forma net tangible book value as of March 31, 2026 was $   million, or $   per share of our common stock. Our pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets (which excludes deferred offering costs) less our total liabilities and divided by the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2026, after giving effect to (i) the Preferred Stock Conversion, (ii) the Warrant Conversion, and (iii) the Note Conversion.

Dilution per share to new investors in this offering represents the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after completion of this offering. After giving further effect to our sale in this offering of shares of our common stock at the assumed initial public offering price of $   per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of March 31, 2026 would have been approximately $   million, or $   per share of our common stock. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value of $   per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $   per share to investors in this offering, as illustrated in the following table:

 

Assumed initial public offering price per share						$
Historical net tangible book deficit per share as of March 31, 2026		$	11.01
Increase per share attributable to pro forma adjustments
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2026		$
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors in this offering
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering
Dilution per share to new investors in this offering						$

Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $   per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease, as applicable, our pro forma net tangible book value by $  million, or $   per share, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by $   million, or $   per share and the dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share to new investors in this offering by $   per share, assuming the number of shares offered, as set forth on the cover of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Similarly, each increase of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares of our common stock offered in this offering would increase our pro forma net tangible book value by approximately $   million or approximately $   per share and pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $   million, or approximately $   per share, and would decrease dilution per share to new investors in this offering by approximately $   per share and each decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares of our common stock offered in this offering would

 

89

decrease our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $   million, or approximately $   per share, and would increase dilution per share to new investors in this offering by approximately $   per share, assuming the assumed initial public offering price per share remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The pro forma as adjusted information is illustrative only, and we will adjust this information based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value (deficit) per share after this offering would be $   per share, the increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share to existing stockholders would be $   per share and the dilution to new investors in this offering would be $   per share.

The following table shows, as of March 31, 2026, on a pro forma as adjusted basis described above, the differences between the existing stockholders and the new investors purchasing shares in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $   per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, with respect to the number of shares purchased from us, the total consideration paid, which includes net proceeds received from the issuance of common and redeemable convertible preferred stock, cash received from the exercise of stock options, and the value of any stock issued for services and the weighted-average price paid per share (in thousands, except share and per share amounts, and percentages):

 

		Shares Purchased								Total Consideration								Weighted- Average Price Per Share
		Number				Percent				Amount				Percent
Existing stockholders								%		$						%		$
New investors																		$
Total							100.0	%		$						%

Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $   per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease, as applicable, total consideration paid by new investors and total consideration paid by all stockholders by approximately $   million, assuming that the number of shares offered, as set forth on the cover of this prospectus, remains the same. Similarly, each increase or decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares of our common stock offered in this offering would increase or decrease, as applicable, total consideration paid by new investors and total consideration paid by all stockholders by approximately $   million, assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same.

In addition, to the extent that any outstanding options are exercised, investors in this offering will experience further dilution.

Except as otherwise indicated, the above discussion and tables assume no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares. If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, our existing stockholders would own   % and our new investors would own   % of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding upon the completion of this offering.

The foregoing tables and calculations (other than historical net tangible book value) are based on      shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2026 (including      shares of unvested restricted common stock subject to repurchase and after giving effect to (i) the Preferred Stock Conversion, (ii) the Warrant Conversion and (iii) the Note Conversion), and excludes:

 

•

6,993,919 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2026 under the 2018 Plan, at a weighted-average exercise price of $1.21 per share;

 

90

•

shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock granted after March 31, 2026 under the 2018 Plan, with a weighted-average exercise price of $   per share; and

 

•

shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans, consisting of:

 

•

9,904,452 shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under the 2018 Plan as of March 31, 2026, which shares will become available under the 2026 Plan upon its effectiveness,

 

•

shares of our common stock to be reserved for future issuance under the 2026 Plan, which will become effective immediately prior to the date of the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and

 

•

shares of our common stock to be reserved for future issuance under the ESPP, which will become effective immediately prior to the date of the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Our 2026 Plan and ESPP provide for automatic annual increases in the number of shares of our common stock reserved thereunder, and our 2026 Plan provides for increases to the number of shares that may be granted thereunder based on shares under our 2018 Plan that expire, are tendered to or withheld by us for payment of an exercise price or for satisfying tax withholding obligations or are forfeited or otherwise repurchased by us. See the section titled “Executive Compensation—Equity compensation plans and other benefit plans” for additional information.

To the extent that these outstanding stock options are exercised, new stock options are issued or we issue additional shares of our common stock in the future, there will be further dilution to new investors. In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital because of market conditions or strategic considerations, even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to our stockholders.

 

91

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion and analysis and other parts of this prospectus contain forward-looking statements based upon our current plans and expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, such as statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations, intentions and beliefs. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should carefully read the section titled “Risk Factors” to gain an understanding of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. Please also see the section titled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company engineering purpose-built in vivo CRISPR technologies designed to extend healthy lifespan through disease prevention and durable therapeutic intervention. While current genetic medicines are largely limited to rare disorders, we are engineering our technologies for use in common diseases affecting millions. By targeting prevalent diseases with significant unmet need and high clinical burden, we aim to usher in a new era of broadly scalable, transformative, and preventative genetic medicines. Our focus is on cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, with initial programs to address the key drivers of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, or ASCVD. We are designing CRISPR-based genetic medicines to be well-tolerated, effective, durable, and scalable enough to shift the treatment paradigm from symptom-driven intervention and chronic care to population-level prevention, with the goal of broadly democratizing access to the cardioprotective effects of known genetic variants. Our lead product candidate, STX-1150, utilizes ELXR, our highly engineered epigenetic silencing technology, and is designed to deliver persistent and potent LDL-C reductions without permanent genetic changes. STX-1150 is a demonstration of moving towards our goal to transform practical therapeutic adherence and real-world medical outcomes for patients in the multibillion-dollar LDL-C lowering landscape. We have secured regulatory clearance from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, or TGA, for and initiated a first-in-human clinical trial of STX-1150 in Australia in up to 64 adults with elevated LDL-C and increased risk of ASCVD. We anticipate reporting initial data from this trial, including safety, tolerability, and LDL-C-lowering activity, in the first half of 2027.

Every 40 seconds, someone in the United States suffers a heart attack, and each year, heart disease costs the nation more than $400 billion, according to the American Heart Association. Despite major advances in our understanding of the pathology of heart disease and ASCVD, and the development of new classes of pharmaceuticals, we believe today’s standard of care for ASCVD is insufficient. Existing treatments fail to demonstrate broad real-world impact due to limitations in efficacy, well-documented side effects, and the burden of chronic polypharmacy, which all contribute to poor uptake, low adherence, and limited persistence. Patients often discontinue therapy due to the lifelong burden of taking medication, loss of insurance, high out-of-pocket costs, or the logistical burden of ongoing clinic visits. Moreover, treatment is often initiated only after substantial cumulative arterial injury or an acute cardiovascular event. These limitations of the current treatment paradigms underscore the importance of developing effective and durable therapies that can be administered safely early in the course of disease, reduce the barriers to treatment continuation for patients, and provide compelling health-economic value to payors.

We believe that a fundamentally different approach is required to meaningfully treat or prevent ASCVD. We must create practical, optimized therapies that remain effective even when used early in disease progression. To realize this vision, we are executing on a differentiated strategy that applies a full-stack engineering approach coupling generative artificial intelligence and machine learning, with massively parallel experimental validation to optimize and tailor CRISPR technologies for the precise demands of each therapeutic application. Through

 

92

this proprietary approach, which we refer to as CRISPR by Design, we systematically evaluate disease biology, target genetics, and commercial opportunities against product requirements to engineer the most appropriate and scalable solution for each therapeutic application. This disciplined, data-driven strategy has led us to engineer two proprietary technologies based on a novel CRISPR-CasX enzyme: the Epigenetic Long-Term X-Repressor, or ELXR, designed for precise, durable epigenetic silencing without altering the underlying DNA sequence; and the X-Editor, or XE, designed for specific and efficient gene editing. When developing a program, rather than committing to a single technology upfront, we advance multiple approaches in parallel and prioritize the modality that demonstrates the most favorable safety, durability, and efficacy profile for each product candidate based on empirical data. We believe this engineering-led, evidence-based strategy, combined with a technology stack purpose-built for broad patient populations, positions us to develop competitive and scalable genetic medicines across a wide range of cardiovascular indications. We are advancing three in vivo product candidates targeting three key lipid drivers of ASCVD: elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or LDL-C, elevated lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), and elevated triglycerides carried by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, or TRLs.

Our lead product candidate, STX-1150, is an epigenetic silencing therapy that is based on our ELXR technology and is designed to durably lower LDL-C for years to decades by repressing the expression of PCSK9, a genetically and clinically validated target. Unlike CRISPR gene editing, base editing, or prime editing approaches, STX-1150 is designed to achieve long-lasting therapeutic benefit without permanently altering underlying DNA sequence. STX-1150 aims to improve on the real-world efficacy of small-molecule, antibody, and siRNA therapies by eliminating the need for years to decades of chronic medication. In a study conducted with non-human primates, or NHPs, a single dose of a prototype STX-1150 was generally well-tolerated and produced therapeutically meaningful, durable LDL-C reduction of greater than 50% sustained for two years. Durable and early LDL-C lowering of this magnitude has been demonstrated in human genetic studies to reduce ASCVD risk by up to 88%, underscoring the potential to transform the current treatment paradigms from late-stage intervention to effective prevention. The large and expanding LDL-C lowering market is characterized by a persistent gap between efficacy observed in controlled settings and real-world outcomes. We believe STX-1150’s long-acting epigenetic mechanism could increase current adherence rates that are typically only 40–50%, which could drive superior clinical outcomes for patients through increased adherence-adjusted efficacy and compelling health-economic value for payors while avoiding the risks of permanent genetic modification. Given that ASCVD is a chronic condition, we believe providing patients with improvements in practical adherence could compound over time to drive better clinical outcomes, enabling more efficient payor management and broadening patient access. As a result, we believe STX-1150 has the potential to expand the growing market for PCSK9-based LDL-C–lowering medicines, which currently exceeds $5 billion annually yet remains significantly underpenetrated, with fewer than 1% of eligible patients treated. We have secured regulatory clearance from the Australian TGA for and initiated a first-in-human clinical trial of STX-1150 in Australia in up to 64 adults with elevated LDL-C and increased risk of ASCVD. We anticipate reporting initial data from this trial, including safety, tolerability, and LDL-C-lowering activity, in the first half of 2027.

Our next programs, STX-1200 and STX-1400, target two additional lipid drivers of ASCVD, elevated Lp(a) and severely high triglycerides, by editing the LPA and APOC3 genes, respectively. Elevated Lp(a) and high triglycerides represent key risk factors for ASCVD affecting large populations.

Beyond our wholly-owned cardiovascular pipeline, we have entered target-limited collaborations with leading global biopharmaceutical companies to apply our precision-engineered CRISPR technologies in other therapeutic areas outside of cardiometabolic. These collaborations provide upfront payments, research funding, milestone payments, and potential royalties. We believe these partnerships validate the versatility and scalability of our technology platform while generating meaningful near- and long-term value.

Financial Overview

Since the commencement of our operations, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to conducting research and development activities, establishing and maintaining our intellectual property portfolio, establishing our corporate infrastructure, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for

 

93

these operations. We have funded our operations to date primarily from proceeds received under collaboration and license agreements with Sanofi, Lilly and Biogen, the issuance and sale of redeemable convertible preferred stock and the issuance of a convertible note. We do not expect to generate product revenue unless and until we successfully develop and obtain approval for the commercialization of a product candidate, and we cannot assure that we will ever generate significant revenue or profits.

Since inception, we have incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, we incurred net losses of $47.8 million and $21.8 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we incurred net losses of $17.4 million. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $175.1 million. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities and general and administrative costs associated with our operations.

We do not expect to generate any revenue from commercial product sales unless and until we successfully complete development and obtain regulatory approval for one or more of our product candidates, which we expect will take a number of years, if ever. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, such that a period-to-period comparison of our results of operations may not be a good indication of our future performance.

We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:

 

•

advance our lead product candidate, STX-1150, through clinical trials and conduct later stage clinical trials;

 

•

initiate clinical trials for our STX-1200 and STX-1400 developmental programs;

 

•

manufacture, or have manufactured, preclinical, clinical and potentially commercial supplies of any product candidates;

 

•

further develop our CRISPR-based technologies, ELXR and XE, as well as engineer new technologies;

 

•

begin or continue preclinical development of any future cardiometabolic programs;

 

•

identify and develop future product candidates;

 

•

experience any delays in our preclinical studies and clinical trials, if any, due to unforeseen events;

 

•

obtain, expand, maintain, defend, and enforce our intellectual property portfolio;

 

•

seek regulatory approvals for any product candidates;

 

•

establish a sales, marketing, and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any product candidates, if approved;

 

•

comply with our obligations under the agreements governing our licenses, collaborations, and strategic partnerships;

 

•

establish additional licenses, collaborations, or strategic partnerships;

 

•

acquire or in-license intellectual property and technologies, work with strategic partners to support and expand our research and discovery, and initiate and conduct preclinical and clinical programs;

 

•

hire additional clinical, scientific, and management personnel, as well as administrative staff to support the growth of our business;

 

•

add operational, financial, and management information systems and personnel; and

 

•

incur additional legal, accounting, and other costs associated with operating as a public company following the completion of this offering.

 

94

Even if we succeed in developing our lead programs and identifying potential product candidates, we may never achieve commercialization, and we may continue to incur substantial research and development expenses and other expenditures to develop and market additional product candidates. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. The size of our future losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future growth of our expenses and our ability to generate product revenue, if any. Our prior losses and expected future losses have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and working capital.

Our net losses and cash flows may fluctuate significantly from period to period, depending on, among other things, variations in the level of expense related to the ongoing development of our product candidates or future development programs; the delay, addition or termination of clinical trials; and the execution of any additional collaboration, licensing or similar arrangements, and the timing of payments we may make or receive under such arrangements.

As of March 31, 2026, we had $49.7 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments. Based on our current operating plan, we estimate that our existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments as of the date of this prospectus, together with the estimated net proceeds from this offering, will be sufficient to fund our projected operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through      . We have based this estimate on our current assumptions, which may prove to be wrong, and we may exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. To finance our operations beyond that point, we will need to raise substantial additional capital. Until we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, and licensing arrangements. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations, even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans.

Macroeconomic Trends

Economic conditions, such as rising inflation, higher interest rates, instability at banking and financial institutions, international trade tensions and tariffs, changes in regulatory laws and monetary exchange rates, and government fiscal policies, can also have a significant effect on operations. Moreover, negative macroeconomic conditions could adversely impact our ability to obtain financing in the future on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In addition, geopolitical instability and any related sanctions could have significant impact on global financial markets, including volatility in the United States and global financial markets.

Collaborations and License Agreements

Regents Exclusive License Agreements

On September 25, 2018, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with the Regents of the University of California, or the Regents, which was amended and restated on September 24, 2020, or, as amended from time to time, the UCB Exclusive License Agreement. Under the UCB Exclusive License Agreement, the Regents granted us an exclusive, worldwide license, with the right to grant sublicenses, under the Regents’ rights in specified patent rights relating to RNA-guided nucleic acid modifying enzymes and methods of use thereof and variant Type V CRISPR/CAS effector polypeptides, which we collectively refer to as CasX and CasY, to make, have made, use, have used, sell, offer to sell and import products and services and practice methods involving CasX and CasY (to the extent covered by the licensed patent rights) for treatment of all human diseases (except infectious viral diseases and diagnostic applications). The Regents also granted us a non-exclusive, worldwide license, with the right to grant sublicenses, under the same Regents’ patent rights as described above to make, have made, use, have used, sell, offer to sell and import products and services and practice methods involving use of CasX and CasY for agricultural, veterinary, industrial bio-production and environmental applications (excluding diagnostic applications). The UCB Exclusive License Agreement is subject to the Regents’ retained

 

95

rights to make and use the patented inventions, licensed products, services and methods and associated technology, and to allow other educational and non-profit institutions, including the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, to do so for educational and research purposes and certain rights of the U.S. government due to federal funding of research giving rise to the patent rights licensed to us by the Regents.

Under the UCB Exclusive License Agreement, we are obligated to diligently proceed with the development, manufacture, and sale of licensed products, services and methods in quantities sufficient to meet market demand. We are also obligated to meet certain clinical stage development, regulatory approval, and commercial milestones by certain specified achievement dates. If we do not meet a milestone by the applicable achievement date or opt to not extend such date, the Regents may terminate the UCB Exclusive License Agreement or change our exclusive license to a non-exclusive license.

In consideration for the rights granted under the UCB Exclusive License Agreement, we (i) paid a $0.1 million upfront license fee, (ii) issued to the Regents 756,370 shares of our common stock, (iii) issued to the Regents a warrant to purchase 440,133 shares of our common stock with an exercise price per share equal to $0.52 per share that expires upon the earlier of the ten-year anniversary of its issuance, the closing of our initial public offering or upon a change of control and (iv) agreed to pay an annual license maintenance fee of $50,000 beginning from September 2019.

We may also be required to pay up to $27.7 million in future development and regulatory milestone payments and up to $3.6 million in future commercial milestone payments with respect to all licensed products, and royalties at percentage rates ranging in the low to mid-single digits on future net sales by us and our sublicensees of licensed products, services and methods, if any, subject to certain minimum annual royalty payments following commercialization. Such royalties may be increased if we or our sublicensees challenge the patent rights licensed to us by the Regents and decreased if we are required to pay a third party for rights to intellectual property in order to produce or practice a licensed product, service or method, but such decrease would not apply to royalties owing to net sales made by our sublicensees. The foregoing royalties will be payable to the Regents until the expiration of all patent rights licensed to us by the Regents. Additionally, we are required to pay a specified percentage of non-royalty sublicensing revenue we receive including cash and premium paid on equity under any sublicensing agreements, subject to certain exceptions.

The term of the UCB Exclusive License Agreement will expire on the date of the last-to-expire valid claim under the Regents’ patent rights licensed to us. As of December 2025, we estimate that the last patent right licensed under the UCB Exclusive License Agreement will expire in 2039, without giving effect to any potential patent term extensions or patent term adjustments. We may terminate the UCB Exclusive License Agreement in whole or as to any portion of the Regents’ patent rights upon a specified written notice period. The Regents have the right to terminate the UCB Exclusive License Agreement, upon written notice, in the event we violate or fail to perform any term of the UCB Exclusive License Agreement, subject to a notice and cure period.

Acuitas Agreements

Development and Option Agreement

On November 7, 2022, we entered into a development and option agreement, or the Acuitas Development and Option Agreement, with Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., as supplemented and amended from time to time, the Acuitas Agreement. Under the Acuitas Development and Option Agreement, we and Acuitas agreed to conduct a program to evaluate and develop product candidates combining our gene editing technology and the lipid nanoparticle, or LNP, technology of Acuitas.

The Acuitas Development and Option Agreement provides us the option to enter into non-exclusive, worldwide license agreements with respect to reserved human genome targets, with the right to sublicense (subject to certain restrictions), under Acuitas’ patent rights and know-how covering its LNP technology to

 

96

exploit licensed products for all human therapeutic or prophylactic uses. We may exercise our option with respect to a specified number of products directed to reserved targets (each of which we refer to herein as an Option). Under the Acuitas Development and Option Agreement, we may non-exclusively reserve certain targets for potential use in the program.

In consideration for the rights granted under the Acuitas Development and Option Agreement, we paid a technology access fee of $0.4 million for each Option. We are also obligated to pay to Acuitas an annual target reservation fee of $0.1 million per target for each target we elect to reserve until we exercise our Option with respect to such target or such target is removed from the list of reserved targets. Upon exercising an Option to enter into a non-exclusive license agreement for a human genome target, we will be required to pay Acuitas a $3.0 million Option exercise fee, subject to reduction by the target reservation and maintenance fees that are creditable against the Option exercise fee for the applicable target.

The term of the Acuitas Development and Option Agreement will expire on November 7, 2027. We have the right to terminate the Acuitas Development and Option Agreement in its entirety upon a specified written notice period. Additionally, either party can terminate the Acuitas Development and Option Agreement for the other party’s uncured material breach or bankruptcy.

License Agreement

If we exercise our Option to enter into a non-exclusive license agreement for any licensed product, we agreed to enter into a pre-negotiated license agreement pursuant to which we will be required to pay Acuitas up to $20.0 million in future development and regulatory milestone payments, or the Acuitas Development and Regulatory Milestone Payments, and up to $40.0 million in future commercial milestone payments, or the Acuitas Commercial Milestone Payments, per licensed product. We will also be obligated to pay Acuitas royalties, the Acuitas Royalties, at percentage rates in the low single digits on future net sales of licensed products by us and our sublicensees, subject to reduction under certain customary conditions. The Acuitas Royalties will be payable on a country-by-country and licensed product-by-licensed product basis commencing on the first commercial sale of a licensed product in a country and continuing until the latest of: (i) the expiration of the last to expire valid claim of a licensed patent that covers such licensed product in such country, (ii) expiration of regulatory exclusivity for such licensed product in such country, and (iii) ten years from the first commercial sale of such licensed product in such country.

In December 2023, we exercised an Option with respect to a licensed product and a licensed genome target and entered into a non-exclusive, worldwide license with Acuitas, with a right to sub-license through multiple tiers, under the licensed LNP technology to research, develop and commercialize the licensed products using the LNP technology, or the Acuitas License Agreement. The Acuitas License Agreement is substantially in the form of pre-negotiated license agreement described above and attached as an exhibit to the Acuitas Development and Option Agreement. The non-refundable Option exercise fee of $2.9 million was recognized in December 2023 as a research and development expense. To the extent achieved, we are also obligated to make the respective Acuitas Development and Regulatory Milestone Payments, the Acuitas Commercial Milestone Payments and the Acuitas Royalties with respect to the licensed product.

The term of such license agreement will expire on a licensed product-by-licensed product and country-by-country basis upon the expiration of our obligation to pay royalties to Acuitas with respect to such licensed product in such country. We will have the right to terminate such license agreement in its entirety upon a specified written notice period. Additionally, either party will be able to terminate such license agreement for the other party’s uncured material breach or bankruptcy.

Sanofi – 2023 in vivo Exclusive License Agreement

On June 19, 2023, we entered into an exclusive license agreement, or the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement, with Genzyme Corporation, a Sanofi affiliate. Under the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement, we granted Sanofi an

 

97

exclusive, worldwide license, with the right to sublicense (subject to certain restrictions), under any patent rights and know-how that are owned or controlled by us relating to our CRISPR CasXE genome editing technologies and target specific gRNA molecules for the research, development, manufacture, and commercialization of in vivo gene editing therapies directed to sickle cell disease, with an option to expand to additional targets for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of any disease, but excluding infectious viral diseases.

Under the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement, we are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to use our proprietary screening systems and know-how to identify potential gRNA molecules for Sanofi’s licensed targets and provide Sanofi with details regarding such potential gRNA molecules while Sanofi is responsible for all other activities.

In consideration for the rights granted under the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement, we received an upfront payment of $40.0 million, approximately $15.0 million through March 31, 2026 in fees and milestones and may receive up to an additional $410.0 million in aggregate in payments for nomination fees, research, development, and regulatory milestones, and up to $825.0 million in aggregate in commercial milestones for all targets (assuming one licensed product is developed for each licensed target), as well as tiered royalties ranging from the high single-digit to low teens percentages on future net sales of licensed products, if any, subject to reduction under certain specified conditions. The royalties will be payable on a country-by-country and licensed product-by-licensed product basis commencing on the first commercial sale in a country and continuing until the latest of: (i) the date on which the sale of such licensed product would no longer infringe a valid claim in such country, (ii) expiration of regulatory exclusivity of such licensed product in such country, or (iii) a low-two digit number of years from the first commercial sale of such licensed product in such country.

We also have a right to opt into global development cost sharing, as well as co-promotion and profit and loss sharing in the United States on one future licensed target. In the event we exercise our opt-in right on one future licensed target, the development and regulatory milestone payments applicable to the licensed products directed to such licensed target will be subject to reduction and the royalty rates for sales of the associated product outside of the United States will be subject to certain upward adjustments. In the event we exercise our opt-in right and subsequently opt-out, the royalty rates may be subject to certain upward adjustments.

The term of the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement will expire on a licensed product-by-licensed product and country-by-country basis upon the expiration of Sanofi’s obligation to pay royalties to us, or, if applicable, the cost sharing term. Sanofi has the right to terminate the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement with respect to a licensed product, licensed target or in its entirety for convenience, upon a specified notice period. If Sanofi terminates the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement for convenience, we have a right of first negotiation for a license under certain of Sanofi’s intellectual property rights developed under the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement that covers the terminated licensed products. We have the right to terminate the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement in the event that Sanofi or its affiliate or sublicensee brings any legal action seeking to invalidate any licensed patent. Additionally, either party can terminate the 2023 Sanofi License Agreement for the other party’s uncured material breach or bankruptcy.

Prevail Therapeutics, Inc. – Exclusive License and Collaboration Agreement

On May 11, 2023, we entered into a license and collaboration agreement, or the Lilly License Agreement, with Prevail Therapeutics, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, for research and development collaborations and granting to Prevail exclusive license rights under patents and technology for certain products. Under the Lilly License Agreement, we granted to Prevail an exclusive, worldwide license, with the right to sublicense (subject to certain restrictions), under any patent rights and know-how that are owned or controlled by us that are necessary or reasonably useful for research, development, and manufacturing of in vivo gene editing therapies that incorporate a CasX editor for the development of in vivo therapies directed to specified targets known to cause serious neurological and neuromuscular diseases, but with respect to certain of the patent rights excluding certain infectious viral diseases. Prevail is obligated to use commercially reasonable

 

98

efforts to obtain regulatory approval for at least one licensed product directed to each licensed target in the United States and at least one other major market country.

As consideration for the licensed rights, we received upfront consideration of a $45.0 million cash payment. In addition, Prevail has paid us $10.0 million in research and development milestone payments through March 31, 2026 and we may receive up to an additional $150.0 million in aggregate research and development milestone payments and up to $1.4 billion in aggregate commercial milestone payments (in each case, assuming one licensed product is developed for each licensed target and we have not opted into profit and loss sharing, discussed below), as well as tiered royalties (subject to reductions) in the mid-single digit to low teens percentages on annual worldwide net sales of such licensed product. The royalties will be payable on a licensed product-by-licensed product and country-by-country basis, from the date of first commercial sale of such licensed product in a country until the latest of (i) the expiration of the last valid claim within the licensed patent rights covering such licensed product in the country in which such licensed product is made, used or sold, (ii) the expiration of the data, regulatory or market exclusivity periods conferred by the applicable regulatory authority in such country with respect to such licensed product, and (iii) the tenth anniversary following the date of the first commercial sale of such licensed product in such country.

We also have a right to opt in to development cost sharing, as well as profit and loss sharing in the United States on one licensed target. In the event we exercise our opt-in right, the commercial milestone payments applicable to licensed products directed to such licensed target will be subject to reduction and the royalty rates for sales of the co-developed product outside of the United States will be subject to certain upward adjustments.

The agreement will expire on a licensed product-by-licensed product basis upon the later of (i) the expiration of the last to expire royalty term in the country for such licensed product and (ii) the expiration of the cost-sharing term. At any time, Prevail may terminate the agreement without cause in its entirety or on a research plan-by-research plan, licensed target-by-licensed target or licensed product-by-licensed product basis upon specified written notice. We may terminate the agreement in part solely with respect to a licensed patent that Prevail directly or indirectly challenges, opposes, seeks to invalidate or render void or unenforceable, subject to certain exceptions. Either party may terminate the agreement for the other party’s uncured material breach.

Components of Results of Operations

Collaboration Revenue

We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from the sale of products to date and do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the near future.

Our revenue to date has been generated from payments received pursuant to collaboration and license arrangements with strategic partners. Collaboration revenue consists of revenue received from full-time equivalent and out-of-pocket reimbursements, upfront, milestone and contingent payments received from our collaborators.

In addition to receiving upfront payments, we may also be entitled to milestones and other contingent payments upon achieving predefined objectives. If a milestone is considered probable of being reached, and if it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone amount would also be included in the transaction price.

We expect that any collaboration revenue we generate from our current collaboration and license agreements, and from any future collaboration partners, will fluctuate in the future as a result of the timing and amount of upfront, milestone and other collaboration agreement payments and other factors.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for the discovery and development of our product candidates. We expense both internal and external research and development expenses to

 

99

operations in the periods in which they are incurred. Nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services to be received in future periods for use in research and development activities are deferred and capitalized. The capitalized amounts are then expensed as the related goods are delivered and as services are performed. We do not currently track our research and development expenses by individual projects or product candidates.

Internal research and development costs include:

 

•

costs to acquire reagents, chemicals, for in-house lab research and preclinical studies;

 

•

expenses related to laboratory supplies and services; and

 

•

expenses related to laboratory related software.

External research and development consist primarily of costs incurred for the development of our product candidates and include:

 

•

fees paid to third parties such as contract research organizations to conduct our discovery, research and development programs, preclinical activities, animal trials and regulatory operations;

 

•

costs to acquire, develop and manufacture supplies for clinical trials and preclinical studies, including fees paid to third parties such as contract manufacturing organizations; and

 

•

the cost to obtain and maintain licenses to intellectual property, such as fees paid under the UCB Exclusive License Agreement and fees paid to Acuitas.

Employee-related expenses include payroll and personnel expenses, including benefits and stock-based compensation expenses. Facilities and overhead costs include depreciation of research and development equipment, allocated overhead and other facilities-related expenses. Professional and consulting fees include fees paid to third party consultants and contractors supporting research, development, and regulatory activities.

We historically do not track our research and development costs by project category, primarily because we use our employee and infrastructure resources across multiple research and development programs that we are advancing in parallel, and therefore we do not allocate salaries, stock-based compensation, employee benefit expenses or other indirect costs related to our research and development to specific product candidates.

We expect our research and development expenses to increase substantially for the foreseeable future as we identify product candidates, conduct further preclinical studies, Investigational New Drug application, or IND-enabling, studies and clinical trials for any such product candidates, continue to invest in research and development activities for discovery programs and preclinical studies, pursue regulatory approvals and expand our pipeline. The process of conducting the necessary preclinical and clinical research to obtain regulatory approvals is costly and time-consuming. To the extent that any product candidates advance to, and continue to advance through, clinical trials, our research and development expenses will continue increasing substantially and may become more variable. The actual probability of success for such product candidates may be affected by a variety of factors, including the safety and efficacy of such product candidates, investment in our clinical programs, the ability of collaborators to successfully develop our licensed product candidates, manufacturing capability, competition with other products and commercial viability. As a result of these variables, we are unable to determine if, when and to what extent we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of any potential product candidates. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any product candidates.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and personnel expenses, including benefits and stock-based compensation, facilities-related expenses and professional fees for legal, accounting, consulting and audit, tax services, consulting fees related to human resources, intellectual property and business development. We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase for the foreseeable future as we

 

100

continue to grow, improve our infrastructure and operate as a public company. This will include additional expenses related to compliance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and listing standards applicable to companies listed on a national securities exchange, director and officer insurance premiums, investor relations activities and other administrative and professional services. We also expect our intellectual property expenses to increase as we expand our intellectual property portfolio.

Interest Income and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net primarily consists of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. We expect interest income to vary each reporting period depending on our average bank deposit, money market fund, and marketable securities balances during the period and market interest rates.

Interest Expense

Interest expense consists of coupon interest accrued on the convertible note that we issued to Lilly in May 2023.

Change in Fair Value of Convertible Note

Change in fair value of convertible note consists of fair value adjustments on the convertible note at each reporting period.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes primarily consists of estimates for federal taxes payable and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits and state taxes. We have generated net operating losses, or NOLs, since inception and have established a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of such assets.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2026

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2026 (in thousands):

 

		Three Months Ended March 31,								Change				Change
		2025				2026				$				%
Collaboration revenue		$	17,125			$	2,233			$	(14,892	)			(87	)%
Operating expenses:
Research and development			15,991				11,305				(4,686	)			(29	)%
General and administrative			6,691				3,355				(3,336	)			(50	)%
Total operating expenses			22,682				14,660				(8,022	)			(35	)%
Loss from operations			(5,557	)			(12,427	)			(6,870	)			124	%
Interest income and other income (expense), net			1,063				515				(548	)			(52	)%
Interest expense			(598	)			(598	)			—				0	%
Change in fair value of convertible note			1,352				(4,609	)			(5,961	)			(441	)%
Net loss before provision for income taxes			(3,740	)			(17,119	)			(13,379	)			358	%
Provision for income taxes			315				(228	)			(543	)			(172	)%
Net loss		$	(3,425	)		$	(17,347	)		$	(13,922	)			406	%

 

101

Collaboration Revenue

The following table summarizes our collaboration revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2026 (dollars in thousands):

 

		Three Months Ended March 31								Change				Change
		2025				2026				$				%
Lilly		$	16,790			$	2,233			$	(14,557	)			(87	)%
Sanofi			335				—				(335	)			(100	)%
Total collaboration revenue		$	17,125			$	2,233			$	(14,892	)			(87	)%

Collaboration revenue was $17.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. Revenue recognized in the three months to March 31, 2026 related to Lilly was $2.2 million compared to $16.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The $14.6 million decrease in revenue related to Lilly was primarily attributable to the achievement of a milestone and the related expiration of substitution rights in the first quarter of 2025, which did not recur in the current period. Excluding these items, revenue attributable to Lilly was also lower in the three months ended March 31, 2026 due to a decrease in the number of active workplans compared to the prior year period. Revenue recognized in the three months to March 31, 2026 related to Sanofi was zero, compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease in revenue related to Sanofi was due to the completion of workplan activities during the prior year period.

Research and Development Expenses

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2026 (dollars in thousands):

 

		Three Months Ended March 31,								Change				Change
		2025				2026				$				%
Internal research expenses		$	2,275			$	827			$	(1,448	)			(64	)%
External research and development			4,977				4,048				(929	)			(19	)%
Employee-related expenses			6,313				4,746				(1,567	)			(25	)%
Facilities and overhead costs			1,964				1,464				(500	)			(25	)%
Professional and consulting fees			462				220				(242	)			(52	)%
Total research and development		$	15,991			$	11,305			$	(4,686	)			(29	)%

Research and development expenses decreased by $4.7 million, or 29%, from $16.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $11.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. This decrease was primarily driven by a $1.6 million decrease in employee-related expenses, consistent with our lower overall headcount compared to the prior year period, a $1.4 million reduction in internal research expenses resulting from the completion of preclinical programs, the successful handover of projects to partners, and a reduction in laboratory headcount. Additionally, external research and development costs declined by $0.9 million due to a decrease in manufacturing activities for our lead program STX-1150 as this moved towards the clinic. Facilities and overhead costs decreased by $0.5 million as a result of lower headcount and costs for professional and consulting fees also decreased by $0.2 million due to a reduction in external contractors being utilized for partnered program activities.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased by $3.3 million, or 50%, from $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. The decrease is

 

102