UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For February 20, 2020
Commission File Number: 000-26424
SSR MINING INC.
(Translation of registrant's name into English)

#800 - 1055 Dunsmuir Street
PO Box 49088, Bentall Postal Station
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada V7X 1G4
(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

[ ] Form 20-F   [x] Form 40-F

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [      ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [           ]

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3 hereto are each hereby incorporated by reference into the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-185498, 333-196116 and 333-198092) of SSR Mining Inc.

DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS FORM 6-K

See the Exhibit Index hereto.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
Date: February 20, 2020
By:
Signed: “Gregory Martin”
 
 
Gregory Martin
 
Title:
Chief Financial Officer






ssrmininglogonewa15.jpg

SUBMITTED HEREWITH

Exhibits
 
 
 
 
 
 



ssrmininglogonewa15.jpg








CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND 2018


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 1


Contents



 
Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Additional Disclosures
 
 
 
 
 

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 2


SSR Mining Inc.
Management's Report
 


Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation and presentation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) are the responsibility of management and have been approved by the Board of Directors.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Consolidated financial statements, by nature, are not precise since they include certain amounts based upon estimates and judgments. When alternative methods exist, management has chosen those it deems to be the most appropriate in the circumstances.
Management, under the supervision of and the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has a process in place to evaluate disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting as required by Canadian and U.S. securities regulations. We, as Chief Executive Officer and as Chief Financial Officer, will certify our annual filings with the Canadian Securities Administrators and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as required in Canada by National Instrument 52-109 and in the United States as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibilities for financial reporting and is ultimately responsible for reviewing and approving the consolidated financial statements. The Board carries out this responsibility principally through its Audit Committee which is independent from management.
The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors and reviews the consolidated financial statements and MD&A; considers the report of the external auditors; assesses the adequacy of our internal controls, including management’s assessment described below; examines the fees and expenses for audit services; and recommends to the Board the independent auditors for appointment by the shareholders. The independent auditors have full and free access to the Audit Committee and meet with it to discuss their audit work, our internal control over financial reporting and financial reporting matters. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board for consideration when approving the consolidated financial statements for issuance to the shareholders and management’s assessment of the internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the shareholders, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, as stated in their report which appears herein.


"Paul Benson"
"Gregory Martin"
Paul Benson
Gregory Martin
President and Chief Executive Officer
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
February 20, 2020
 


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 3


SSR Mining Inc.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of SSR Mining Inc.

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of SSR Mining Inc. and its subsidiaries (together, the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 4


SSR Mining Inc.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Recoverable amount of Puna Operations cash-generating unit

As described in Notes 2, 3 and 24 to the consolidated financial statements, management assessed impairment indicators for the Company’s mineral properties, plant and equipment and concluded, at December 31, 2019, an impairment indicator existed at Puna Operations cash-generating unit (“Puna Operations CGU”), which had a carrying value of $141.9 million, and as such, management performed an impairment assessment. The recoverable amount of Puna Operations CGU was determined to be the fair value less costs of disposal and was based on a discounted cash flow model. The recoverable amount of Puna Operations CGU determined by management exceeded its carrying value, and as a result no impairment was recorded. Significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model, included: metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and the foreign exchange rate. The Company’s estimates of Mineral Reserves have been developed by management’s specialists.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the recoverable amount of Puna Operations cash-generating unit is a critical audit matter are: (i) there was significant judgment exercised by management when determining the significant assumptions included in its discounted cash flow model, including, metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and the foreign exchange rate which led to a high degree of auditor subjectivity and judgment in applying our procedures and in evaluating audit evidence relating to the impairment assessment of Puna Operations CGU; and (ii) our audit effort included the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the discount rate.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 5


SSR Mining Inc.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures involved testing the effectiveness of internal controls relating to management’s impairment assessment, including controls over the recoverable amount of Puna Operations CGU. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for determining the recoverable amount of Puna Operations CGU, including evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model; testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the model; and evaluating the significant assumptions used by management. Evaluating whether the significant assumptions used by management, including metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and the foreign exchange rate were reasonable involved considering (i) the current and past performance of Puna Operations CGU, (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data, including external metal prices and the foreign exchange rate, and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the discount rate. The work of management’s specialists was used in performing procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the amount of recoverable Mineral Reserves. As a basis for using this work, the specialists’ qualifications and objectivity were understood, as well as their methods and assumptions. The procedures performed also included tests of the data used by the specialists and an evaluation of their findings. Evaluating the significant assumptions relating to the estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves also involved obtaining evidence to support the reasonableness of the assumptions, including considering the past performance of Puna Operations CGU and whether they were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.
Recoverable amount of goodwill

As described in Notes 2, 3 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill balance was $49.8 million as at December 31, 2019, and arose from the acquisition of the Seabee Gold Operation. The goodwill is required to be tested annually for impairment and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable. For the purpose of the goodwill impairment test, the recoverable amount of the Seabee Gold Operation cash-generating unit (“the Seabee Gold Operation CGU”), was determined to be the fair value less cost of disposal and was based on a discounted cash flow model. The recoverable amount of the Seabee Gold Operation CGU determined by management exceeded its carrying value, and as a result no impairment loss was recorded. Significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model, included: metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and a Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate. The Company’s estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources have been developed by management’s specialists.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the recoverable amount of goodwill is a critical audit matter are: (i) there was significant judgment exercised by management when determining the significant assumptions included in its discounted cash flow model, including, metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and a Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate which led to a high degree of auditor subjectivity, judgment and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence relating to the determination of the recoverable amount of goodwill; and (ii) our audit effort included the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the discount rate.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 6


SSR Mining Inc.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures involved testing the effectiveness of internal controls relating to management’s goodwill impairment assessment, including controls over the recoverable amount of the Seabee Gold Operation CGU. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for determining the recoverable amount of the Seabee Gold Operation CGU, evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model; testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the model; and evaluating the significant assumptions used by management. Evaluating whether the significant assumptions used by management, including metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and a Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate, were reasonable involved considering (i) the current and past performance of the Seabee Gold Operation CGU, (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data, including external metal prices and the foreign exchange rate, and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the discount rate. The work of management’s specialists was used in performing procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the amount of recoverable Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources. As a basis for using this work, the specialists’ qualifications and objectivity were understood, as well as their methods and assumptions. The procedures performed also included tests of the data used by the specialists and an evaluation of their findings. Evaluating the significant assumptions relating to the estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources also involved obtaining evidence to support the reasonableness of the assumptions, including considering the past performance of the Seabee Gold Operation CGU and whether they were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

(Signed) “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”

Chartered Professional Accountants


Vancouver, Canada
February 20, 2020

We have served as the company's auditor since 1989.




SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 7


SSR Mining Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)


 
Note
December 31

December 31

 
 
2019

2018

Current assets
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
5
$
503,647

$
419,212

Trade and other receivables
6
87,306

42,841

Marketable securities
7
66,453

29,542

Inventories
8
237,570

232,748

Other
 
4,686

8,776

 
 
899,662

733,119

Non-current assets
 
 
 
Mineral properties, plant and equipment
9
769,462

701,175

Deferred income tax assets
12
63

7,523

Goodwill
10
49,786

49,786

Other
11
31,134

29,535

Total assets
 
$
1,750,107

$
1,521,138

 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
13
$
111,125

$
83,043

Reclamation and closure cost provision
15
8,766

211

Current portion of debt
14
114,280

—

 
 
234,171

83,254

Non-current liabilities
 
 
 
Deferred income tax liabilities
12
127,815

107,909

Reclamation and closure cost provision
15
75,469

61,961

Debt
14
169,769

247,551

Other
16
8,929

14,487

Total liabilities
 
616,153

515,162

 
 
 
 
Shareholders' equity
 
 
 
Share capital
17
1,083,766

1,055,417

Other reserves
18
19,762

(16,303
)
Equity component of convertible notes
14
106,425

68,347

Deficit
 
(75,999
)
(133,314
)
Total shareholders' equity attributable to SSR Mining shareholders
 
1,133,954

974,147

Non-controlling interest
4
—

31,829

Total equity
 
1,133,954

1,005,976

Total liabilities and equity
 
$
1,750,107

$
1,521,138

 
 
 
 
Commitments (note 26(c))
 
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
Approved by the Board of Directors and authorized for issue on February 20, 2020.
"Beverlee F. Park"
 
"Paul Benson"
Beverlee F. Park, Director
 
Paul Benson, Director

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 8


SSR Mining Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for per share amounts)



 
Note
2019

2018

Revenue
19
$
606,850

$
420,675

Cost of sales
 
 
 
   Production costs
 
(329,810
)
(245,111
)
   Depletion and depreciation
 
(106,157
)
(98,719
)
 
 
(435,967
)
(343,830
)
Income from mine operations
 
170,883

76,845

General and administrative expenses
20
(30,929
)
(32,941
)
Exploration, evaluation and reclamation expenses
 
(17,616
)
(14,009
)
Operating income
 
122,338

29,895

Interest and other finance income
21
11,910

11,761

Interest expense and other finance costs
21
(31,598
)
(33,630
)
Loss on redemption of convertible debt
14
(5,423
)
—

Other (expense) income
22
(5,739
)
(9,092
)
Foreign exchange (loss) gain
 
(5,359
)
9,156

Income before income taxes
 
86,129

8,090

Income tax expense
12
(30,372
)
(8,121
)
Net income (loss)
 
$
55,757

$
(31
)
Attributable to:
 
 
 
Equity holders of SSR Mining
 
$
57,315

$
6,379

Non-controlling interest
 
(1,558
)
(6,410
)
 
 
 
 
Net income per share attributable to equity holders of SSR Mining
 
 
 
Basic
23

$0.47


$0.05

Diluted
23

$0.47


$0.05

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 9


SSR Mining Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)


 
 
2019

2018

Net income (loss)
 
$
55,757

$
(31
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 

 

Items that will not be reclassified to net income:
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on marketable securities, at FVTOCI, net of tax (expense) recovery of ($4,811) and $6,059
 
29,819

(37,686
)
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to net income:
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on effective portion of derivative, net of tax (expense) recovery of ($702) and $850
 
2,226

(2,907
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
32,045

(40,593
)
Total comprehensive income (loss)
 
$
87,802

$
(40,624
)
Attributable to:
 
 
 
Equity holders of SSR Mining
 
$
89,360

$
(34,214
)
Non-controlling interest
 
(1,558
)
(6,410
)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 10


SSR Mining Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)


 
 
Common Shares
Other reserves
(note 18)

Equity
 component of convertible notes

 
Total equity
attributable to equity holders of SSR Mining

 
 
 
 Note
Shares
(000's)

Amount

Deficit

Non-controlling
interest

Total
equity

Balance, January 1, 2018
 
119,841

$
1,047,233

$
24,998

$
68,347

$
(139,693
)
$
1,000,885

$
23,043

$
1,023,928

Exercise of stock options
17
899

8,184

(2,864
)
—

—

5,320

—

5,320

Equity-settled share-based compensation
17
—

—

2,156

—

—

2,156

—

2,156

Funding from non-controlling interest
 
—

—

—

—

—

—

15,196

15,196

Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year
 
—

—

(40,593
)
—

6,379

(34,214
)
(6,410
)
(40,624
)
Balance, December 31, 2018
 
120,740

$
1,055,417

$
(16,303
)
$
68,347

$
(133,314
)
$
974,147

$
31,829

$
1,005,976

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise of stock options and settlement of RSUs
17
1,098

$
10,131

$
(2,804
)
$
—

$
—

$
7,327

$
—

$
7,327

Acquisition of non-controlling interest
4
1,246

18,218

1,463

—

—

19,681

(33,981
)
(14,300
)
Equity-settled share-based compensation
17
—

—

4,005

—

—

4,005

—

4,005

Transfer of equity-settled Performance Share Units
 
—

—

1,356

—

—

1,356

—

1,356

Equity value of convertible debt issued
14
—

—

—

42,903

—

42,903

—

42,903

Equity value of convertible debt redeemed
14
—

—

—

(4,825
)
—

(4,825
)
—

(4,825
)
Funding from non-controlling interest
 
—

—

—

—

—

—

3,710

3,710

Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year
 
—

—

32,045

—

57,315

89,360

(1,558
)
87,802

Balance, December 31, 2019
 
123,084

$
1,083,766

$
19,762

$
106,425

$
(75,999
)
$
1,133,954

$
—

$
1,133,954

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

SSR Mining Inc.

 
Financial Statements Year-End 2018 | 11



SSR Mining Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)

 
Note
2019

2018

Cash flows from operating activities
 
 

 

Net income (loss) for the year
 
$
55,757

$
(31
)
Adjustments for:
 
 

 

Depreciation and depletion
 
108,247

100,479

Interest and other finance income
 
(11,910
)
(11,761
)
Interest expense
 
30,010

32,325

Income tax expense
 
30,372

8,121

Non-cash foreign exchange loss (gain)
 
2,162

(13,002
)
Loss on redemption of convertible debt
14
5,423

—

Other
28
11,541

6,883

Net changes in non-cash working capital items
28
(61,046
)
(30,934
)
Cash generated from operating activities before interest and taxes
 
170,556

92,080

Moratorium paid
 
(3,862
)
(5,683
)
Interest paid
 
(11,646
)
(13,831
)
Income taxes paid
 
(20,850
)
(12,797
)
Cash generated by operating activities
 
134,198

59,769

Cash flows from investing activities
 
 

 

Expenditures on mineral properties, plant and equipment
 
(135,768
)
(158,031
)
Purchase of marketable securities
7
(3,435
)
(23,057
)
Loan to joint venture partner
 
(1,967
)
(8,032
)
Net proceeds from sale of marketable securities
7
3,308

63,445

Interest received
 
9,697

9,219

Acquisition of non-controlling interest
4
(2,415
)
—

Other
 
252

526

Cash used in investing activities
 
(130,328
)
(115,930
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 
 

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options
 
7,237

5,320

Funding from non-controlling interest
 
3,710

15,196

Redemption of convertible notes
14
(152,250
)
—

Issuance of convertible notes
14
230,000

—

Convertible notes issuance costs
 
(7,068
)
—

Lease payments
 
(1,076
)
—

Cash generated by financing activities
 
80,553

20,516

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
12

(5,007
)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
84,435

(40,652
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
 
419,212

459,864

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
 
$
503,647

$
419,212

Supplemental cash flow information (note 28)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 12


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)



1.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS

SSR Mining Inc. ("we", "us", "our" or "SSR Mining") is a company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada and our shares are publicly listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange in Canada and the NASDAQ Global Market in the United States. Together with our subsidiaries, we (the “Group”) are principally engaged in the operation, acquisition, exploration and development of precious metal resource properties located in the Americas. We have three producing mines and a portfolio of precious metal dominant projects located throughout the Americas. SSR Mining Inc. is the ultimate parent of the Group.

Our address is Suite 800, 1055 Dunsmuir Street, PO Box 49088, Vancouver, British Columbia, V7X 1G4.

Our focus is on safe, profitable gold and silver production from our Marigold mine in Nevada, U.S., Seabee Gold Operation in Saskatchewan, Canada and our Puna Operations in Jujuy, Argentina, and to advance, as market and project conditions permit, our other principal development projects towards development and commercial production.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are as follows:
a)
Basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. These statements were authorized for issue by our Board of Directors on February 20, 2020.
b)
Basis of measurement
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for those assets and liabilities that are measured at revalued amounts or fair values at the end of each reporting period.
c)Basis of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of SSR Mining Inc. and all of our subsidiaries. Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which we have control. We control an entity when we are exposed to, or have rights to, variable returns from our involvement with the entity and have the ability to affect those returns through our power over the entity. Subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial results of the Company from the effective date of acquisition of control up to the effective date of loss of control.
The principal subsidiaries of SSR Mining Inc. and their geographic locations at December 31, 2019 were as follows:
Subsidiary
Location
Ownership
Principal project or purpose
Marigold Mining Company
USA
100%
Marigold
SGO Mining Inc.
Canada
100%
Seabee Gold Operation
Puna Operations Inc. (1) (2)
Canada
100%
Puna Operations
SSR Durango, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
100%
Pitarrilla
Intertrade Metals Limited Partnership
Canada
100%
Sales and marketing
(1) 
On September 18, 2019, we acquired the remaining 25% interest in Puna Operations Inc. ("Puna Operations") from Golden Arrow Resources Corporation ("Golden Arrow"), increasing our ownership from 75% to 100% (note 4).
(2) 
Mina Pirquitas Sociedad Anonima, a subsidiary of Puna Operations Inc., is the Argentine operating company.
Intercompany assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows between the SSR Mining and our subsidiaries are eliminated.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 13


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
d)Foreign currency translation
The functional and presentation currency of SSR Mining and each of our subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, foreign currency transactions and balances of the Company’s subsidiaries are translated as follows: (i) monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar (“foreign currencies”) are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date; (ii) non-monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies and measured at other than fair value are translated using the rates of exchange at the transaction dates; (iii) non-monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at fair value are translated using the rates of exchange at the dates those fair values are determined; and (iv) income statement items denominated in foreign currencies are principally translated using daily exchange rates, except for depletion and depreciation which is translated at historical exchange rates. Foreign exchange gains and losses are recognized in net (loss) earnings and presented in the consolidated statements of income (loss) in accordance with the nature of the transactions to which the foreign currency gains and losses relate. Unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses on cash and cash equivalent balances denominated in foreign currencies are disclosed separately in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
e)Revenue recognition
Our primary source of revenue is the sale of gold bullion or doré and metal-bearing concentrate.
Revenue relating to the sale of metals is recognized when control of the metal or related services are transferred to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those products or services. In determining whether we have satisfied a performance obligation, we consider the indicators of the transfer of control, which include, but are not limited to, whether: it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the sale will flow to us; we have a present right to payment; we have transferred physical possession of the asset to the customer; the customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset; and the customer has legal title to the asset.
Gold bullion and doré sales

Gold bullion and doré is sold primarily to bullion banks in the London spot market. The sales price is fixed on the date of sale based on the gold spot price. Generally, we record revenue from sales of gold bullion at the time of physical delivery, which is also the date that title to the gold passes and cash is received.

Concentrate sales

The initial sales price of our concentrate metal sales is determined on a provisional basis at the date of sale as the final selling price is subject to movements in the monthly average London Metal Exchange or London Bullion Market Association prices up to the date of final pricing. The period between provisional invoicing and final pricing, or settlement period, is typically between 30 and 120 days.

We recognize revenues under these contracts at the point that control passes to the customer, which is when the risk and rewards of ownership pass over to the customer, typically at port of loading or port of unloading. Upon transfer of control of the concentrate, we recognize revenue based on the estimated prices for the estimated month of settlement and initial assay results. The associated receivable is subsequently remeasured to fair value by reference to forward market prices at each period end until final settlement, with the impact of changes in the forward market prices recognized in other revenue in the consolidated statements of income (loss) as they occur. Refining and treatment charges are netted against revenues from metal concentrate sales.






SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 14


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
f)Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and held at banks and short-term investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less, which are readily convertible into a known amount of cash and excludes any restricted cash that is not available for use by us.
g)Inventories
Stockpiled ore, leach pad inventory and finished goods are valued at the lower of average cost and estimated net realizable value (“NRV”). Cost includes all direct costs incurred in production including direct labour and materials, freight, depreciation and depletion and directly attributable overhead costs. NRV is calculated using the estimated price at the time of sale based on prevailing and forecast metal prices less estimated future production costs to convert the inventory into saleable form and all associated selling costs. Any write-downs of inventory to NRV are recognized within cost of sales in the consolidated statements of income (loss). If there is a subsequent increase in the value of inventory, the previous write-downs to NRV are reversed up to cost to the extent that the related inventory has not been sold.
Stockpiled ore inventory represents ore that has been extracted from the mine and is available for further processing. The cost of stockpiled ore inventory is derived from the current mining costs incurred up to the point of stockpiling the ore and is removed at average cost as ore is processed. Quantities of stockpiled ore are verified by periodic surveys.
The recovery of gold and by-products from oxide ore is achieved through a heap leaching process at our Marigold mine. Under this method, ore is stacked on leach pads and treated with a chemical solution that dissolves the gold contained within the ore. The resulting pregnant solution is further processed in a plant where the gold is recovered. The cost of leach pad inventory is derived from current mining and leaching costs and removed as ounces of gold are recovered at the average cost per recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pads. Estimates of recoverable gold in the leach pads are calculated based on the quantities of ore placed on the leach pads (measured tonnes added to the leach pads), the grade of ore placed on the leach pads (based on assay data), and an estimated recovery percentage.
Finished goods inventory includes metal concentrates at site and in transit, doré at a site or refinery, or bullion in a metal account.
Materials and supplies inventories are valued at the lower of average cost and NRV. Costs include acquisition, freight and other directly attributable costs. A regular review is undertaken to determine the extent of any provision for obsolescence.
Inventory that is not planned to be processed or used within one year is classified as non-current.
h)Mineral properties, plant and equipment
(i)    Mineral properties
Mineral properties contain Mineral Reserves or Mineral Resources and exploration potential. The value associated with Mineral Resources and exploration potential is the value beyond Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves.
Mineral Reserves represent the estimate of ore that can be economically and legally extracted from our mining properties. Mineral Resources represent property interests that contain potentially economic mineralized material such as Inferred Mineral Resources within pits; Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources with insufficient drill spacing to qualify as Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves; and Inferred Mineral Resources in close proximity to Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves. Exploration potential represents the estimated potential mineralized material contained within: (i) areas adjacent to existing Mineral Reserves and mineralization located within the immediate mine area; (ii) areas outside of immediate mine areas that are not part of Measured, Indicated, or Inferred Mineral Resources; and (iii) greenfields exploration potential that is not associated with any other production, development, or exploration stage property.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 15


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
h)Mineral properties, plant and equipment (continued)
(i)    Mineral properties (continued)
Capitalized costs of mineral properties include the following:
▪
Costs of acquiring exploration and development stage properties in asset acquisitions, or the value attributed to properties acquired in a business combination;
▪
Economically recoverable exploration and evaluation expenses;
▪
Expenditures incurred to develop mining properties, net of proceeds from pre-production sales, prior to reaching operating levels intended by management;
▪
Certain costs incurred during production;
▪
Estimates of reclamation and closure costs; and
▪
Borrowing costs incurred that are attributable to qualifying mineral properties.
Acquisition of mineral properties
The costs of acquiring exploration and development stage properties, including transaction costs, in an asset purchase are capitalized as an exploration and evaluation asset or a mineral property at cost. The value attributed to acquiring mineral properties at an operating mine in a business combination is recognized as a mineral property. The value attributed to acquiring exploration potential in a business combination is recognized as an exploration and evaluation asset.
Exploration and evaluation expenditures
Exploration expenditures are the costs incurred in the initial search for mineral deposits with economic potential or in the process of obtaining more information about existing mineral deposits. Exploration expenditures typically include costs associated with acquiring the rights to explore, prospecting, sampling, mapping, diamond drilling and other work involved in searching for Mineral Resources, as defined by National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").
Evaluation expenditures are costs incurred to establish the technical and commercial viability of developing mineral deposits identified through exploration activities or by acquisition. Evaluation expenditures include the cost of: (i) further defining the volume and grade of deposits through drilling of core samples, trenching and sampling activities in an ore body; (ii) determining the optimal methods of extraction and metallurgical and treatment processes; (iii) studies related to surveying, transportation and infrastructure requirements; (iv) permitting activities; and (v) economic evaluations to determine whether development of mineralized material is commercially justified including preliminary economic assessments, pre-feasibility and final feasibility studies.
Exploration and evaluation expenditures are expensed until it has been determined that a property is technically feasible and commercially viable, in which case subsequent evaluation costs incurred to develop a mineral property are capitalized.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 16


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
h)Mineral properties, plant and equipment (continued)
(i)    Mineral properties (continued)
Development expenditures
Once we have met the criteria for capitalization of exploration and evaluation expenditures, the carrying value of the exploration and evaluation asset is reclassified as a mineral property. All costs, including pre-operating costs are capitalized until the point that the mineral property is capable of operating as intended by us. This is determined by: (i) completion of operational commissioning of major mine and plant components; (ii) operating results being achieved consistently for a period of time; (iii) indicators that these operating results will be continued; and (iv) other factors being present, including one or more of the following: a significant portion of the plant/mill capacity being achieved; a significant portion of available funding being directed towards operating activities; a predetermined, reasonable period of time being passed; or significant milestones for the development of the mineral property being achieved.
In open pit mining operations, it is necessary to incur costs to remove waste material in order to access the ore body, which is known as stripping, with the stripping ratio being the ratio of waste material to ore. Stripping costs incurred prior to the production stage of a mining property (pre-stripping costs) are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related mining property.
Once the mineral property is capable of operating as intended, further operating costs, including depreciation and depletion, are included within inventory as incurred.
Costs incurred during production
During the production phase of an underground mine, mine development costs incurred to maintain current production are included in mine operating costs. These costs include the development and access (tunnelling) costs of production drifts to develop the ore body in the current production cycle. Development costs incurred to build new shafts, declines and ramps that enable permanent access to ore underground are capitalized as incurred. Capitalized underground development costs are depleted using the units-of-production method, as described below.
During the production phase of an open pit mine, stripping costs incurred that provide improved access to ore that will be produced in future periods and that would not have otherwise been accessible are capitalized (as a "deferred stripping asset").The costs qualifying for capitalization are those costs directly incurred to perform the stripping activity that improves access to the identified component of ore, plus an allocation of directly attributable overhead costs, and which are determined using a strip ratio methodology. The strip ratio represents the ratio of the estimated total volume of waste material to the estimated total quantity of economically recoverable ore of the Mineral Reserves for which access has been improved. The deferred stripping asset is included as part of the carrying amount of the mineral property. Capitalized stripping costs are amortized based on the estimated recoverable ounces contained in Mineral Reserves that directly benefit from the stripping activities. Costs for waste removal that do not give rise to future economic benefits are included in production costs in the period in which they are incurred.
Measurement
Mineral properties are recorded at cost less accumulated depletion and impairment losses.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 17


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
h)Mineral properties, plant and equipment (continued)
(i)    Mineral properties (continued)
Depletion of mineral properties
Our mineral properties are classified as either those subject to depletion or not yet subject to depletion. On acquisition of a mineral property, we prepare an estimate of the fair value attributable to Mineral Reserves, Mineral Resources and exploration potential attributable to the property. The fair value attributable to Mineral Resources is classified as mineral properties not yet subject to depletion. As Mineral Resources are converted into Mineral Reserves at operating properties, a portion of the asset balance is reclassified as subject to depletion using an average cost per ounce.
Mineral properties subject to depletion are depleted using the units-of-production method. In applying the units-of-production method over the recoverable ounces to which the asset specifically relates, depletion is calculated using the recoverable ounces extracted from the mine in the period as a percentage of the total recoverable ounces expected to be extracted in current and future periods based on the Mineral Reserves.
We review the estimated total recoverable ounces contained in depletable Mineral Reserves annually and when events and circumstances indicate that such a review should be made. Changes to estimated total recoverable ounces contained in depletable Mineral Reserves are accounted for prospectively. No amortization is charged during the evaluation and development phases as the asset is not available for use.
(ii)   Plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.
The cost of an item of plant and equipment includes the purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for its intended use, an initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located, and for qualifying assets, the associated borrowing costs.
Where an item of plant and equipment is comprised of major components with different useful lives, the components are accounted for as separate items of plant and equipment.
Costs incurred for major overhaul of existing equipment and sustaining capital are capitalized as plant and equipment and are subject to depreciation once they are available for use. Major overhauls include improvement programs that increase the productivity or extend the useful life of an asset beyond that initially envisaged. The costs of routine maintenance and repairs that do not constitute improvement programs are accounted for as a cost of inventory.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 18


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
h)Mineral properties, plant and equipment (continued)
(ii)   Plant and equipment (continued)
Depreciation of plant and equipment
The carrying amounts of plant and equipment are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the estimated useful lives of the specific assets concerned, or the estimated life-of-mine ("LOM"), if shorter. Depreciation starts on the date when the asset is available for its intended use. The major categories of plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis using the estimated lives indicated below:
Vehicles
5 - 7 years
Mining equipment
5 - 20 years
Mobile equipment components
2 - 9 years
Buildings
LOM
Mine plant equipment
LOM
Underground infrastructure
LOM

Assets under construction are not depreciated until available for their intended use.

We conduct a review of residual values, useful lives and depreciation methods employed for plant and equipment annually, and when events and circumstances indicate that such a review should be made. Any changes in estimates that arise from this review are accounted for prospectively.

(iii)  Impairment

At the end of each reporting period, we review our mineral properties, plant and equipment to determine whether there is any indication that these assets are impaired. If any such indication exists, an estimate of the recoverable amount is undertaken If the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount then an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Impairment is normally assessed at the cash-generating unit ("CGU") level, which is identified as the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets. Each individual mining interest that is an operating mine is typically a CGU.
The recoverable amount of a mine site is the greater of an asset’s fair value less costs to dispose (“FVLCTD”) and value in use (“VIU”). FVLCTD is defined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. VIU is determined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continued use of the asset in its present form and from its ultimate disposal. The fair value of mine sites is generally determined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continued use of the asset, including any expansion prospects.
Mineral properties, plant and equipment that have been impaired are tested for possible reversal of the impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the impairment may have reversed. When an impairment loss reverses in a subsequent period, the revised carrying amount shall not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset previously, less subsequent depletion and depreciation. Reversals of impairment losses are recognized in net earnings in the period in which the reversals occur.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 19


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
i)Goodwill
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized at their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. The excess of the fair value of consideration paid over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is recognized as goodwill and allocated to CGUs.

Goodwill arises principally because of the following factors: (i) the ability to capture buyer-specific synergies arising upon a transaction; (ii) the ability to increase Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources through exploration activities, and (iii) the requirement to record a deferred tax liability for the difference between the assigned values and the tax bases of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
 
Goodwill is not amortized. We perform an annual impairment test for goodwill and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of a CGU to which goodwill has been allocated exceeds the recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount in excess. The impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the CGU to $nil and then to the other assets of the CGU based on the relative carrying amounts of those assets. Impairment losses recognized for goodwill are not reversed in subsequent periods should its value recover.
j)Share-based payments
The fair value of estimated number of stock options and other equity-settled share-based payment arrangements that will eventually vest, determined at the date of grant, is recognized as a share-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of income (loss) over the vesting period, with a corresponding increase to equity. We estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and estimate the expected forfeiture rate at the date of grant.
Share-based payment arrangements considered to be cash-settled include our Directors’ Deferred Share Unit (“DSU”) Plan, our Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”) Plan, our Performance Share Unit (“PSU”) Plan and our 2017 Share Compensation Plan, which replaces our RSU Plan and PSU Plan. The fair values of these arrangements are recognized as share-based compensation expenses in the consolidated statements of income (loss) over the vesting period, with a corresponding increase to accrued liabilities. The fair value of DSUs and RSUs is estimated based on the quoted market price of our common shares and are remeasured at each reporting period. The fair value of PSUs is estimated using a Monte Carlo valuation model.
Under our 2017 Share Compensation Plan, we have the option to settle vested PSUs in either cash or common shares. On February 22, 2019, our Board of Directors indicated its intention to settle the PSUs issued under our 2017 Share Compensation Plan, when vested, in common shares of SSR Mining. Prior to this date, based on our past history of settling PSUs in cash, we had accounted for our obligations as a liability. The impact of this change is discussed in note 17(e).
When awards are forfeited because non-market based vesting conditions are not satisfied, the expense previously recognized is proportionately reversed.
k)Taxation
The income tax expense for the period is comprised of current and deferred tax, and is recognized in the consolidated statements of income (loss) except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in shareholders’ equity, in which case the tax is recognized in equity.
Current income tax
Current tax for each of our taxable entities is based on the local taxable profit for the period at the local statutory tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the date of the consolidated statements of financial position.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 20


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
k)Taxation (continued)
Deferred tax
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized, using the liability method, for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, unused tax losses and other income tax deductions. Deferred income tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available to be utilized against those deductible temporary differences. The extent to which deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses and other income tax deductions are expected to be realized are reassessed at the end of each reporting period.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the related deferred income tax assets are realized or the deferred income tax liabilities are settled. The measurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which we expect, at the reporting date, to recover and settle the carrying amounts of its assets and liabilities, respectively. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period in which the change is substantively enacted.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are not recognized if the temporary difference arises on the initial recognition of assets and liabilities in a transaction other than a business combination, that at the time of the transaction, affects neither the taxable nor the accounting profit or loss.
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and associates, and interests in joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by us and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
We recognize deferred income taxes relating to the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on the tax bases of non-monetary assets and liabilities which are denominated in currencies other than our functional currency. The resultant changes in deferred taxes are recognized in deferred income tax expense/recovery in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). We recognize foreign exchange gains and losses on current income tax receivable and payable balances denominated in currencies other than our functional currency in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the current tax assets against the current tax liabilities, when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority, and we intend to settle our current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
Royalties and other tax arrangements
Royalties and other arrangements are treated as taxation arrangements when they have the characteristics of income tax. This is considered to be the case when they are imposed under government authority and the amount payable is calculated by reference to an income measure. Obligations arising from royalty arrangements that do not satisfy these criteria are recognized as current liabilities and included within cost of sales.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 21


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
l)
Income per share
Income per share calculations are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For calculations of diluted income per share, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding are adjusted to include the effects of all potentially dilutive share equivalents, such as stock options and convertible notes, whereby proceeds from the potential exercise of dilutive stock options with exercise prices that are below the average market price of the underlying shares are assumed to be used in purchasing our common shares at their average market price for the period.
m)Financial instruments
Measurement – initial recognition
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized in our consolidated statements of financial position when we become a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. On initial recognition, all financial assets and financial liabilities are recorded at fair value, net of attributable transaction costs, except for financial assets and liabilities classified as at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”). The directly attributable transaction costs of financial assets and liabilities classified as at FVTPL are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.

Subsequent measurement of financial assets and liabilities depends on the classifications of such assets and liabilities.
Classification of financial assets
Amortized cost:
Financial assets that meet the following conditions are measured subsequently at amortized cost:
(i)
The financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows, and
(ii)
The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
The amortized cost of a financial asset is the amount at which the financial asset is measured at initial recognition minus the principal repayments, plus the cumulative amortization using effective interest method of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount, adjusted for any loss allowance. Interest income is recognized using the effective interest method.
Our financial assets at amortized cost primarily include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and interest and other receivables included in other current and non-current financial assets in the consolidated statements of financial position.
Fair value through other comprehensive income ("FVTOCI"):
Financial assets that meet the following conditions are measured at FVTOCI:
(i)
The financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets, and
(ii)
The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
Our FVTOCI financial assets include our equity instruments designated as FVTOCI.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 22


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
m)Financial instruments (continued)
Equity instruments designated as FVTOCI:
On initial recognition, we may make an irrevocable election (on an instrument-by-instrument basis) to designate investments in equity instruments that would otherwise be measured at FVTPL to present subsequent changes in fair value in other comprehensive income. Designation at FVTOCI is not permitted if the equity investment is held for trading or if it is contingent consideration recognized by an acquirer in a business combination. Investments in equity instruments at FVTOCI are initially measured at fair value plus transaction costs. Subsequently, they are measured at fair value with gains and losses arising from changes in fair value recognized in other comprehensive income ("OCI"). The cumulative gain or loss is not reclassified to profit or loss on disposal of the equity instrument, instead, it is transferred to retained earnings. We have designated all investments in equity instruments that are not held for trading as FVTOCI (see note 3).
Financial assets measured subsequently at FVTPL:
By default, all other financial assets are measured subsequently at FVTPL.
We, at initial recognition, may also irrevocably designate a financial asset as measured at FVTPL if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognizing the gains and losses on them on different bases.
Financial assets measured at FVTPL are measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period, with any fair value gains or losses recognized in profit or loss to the extent they are not part of a designated hedging relationship. Fair value is determined in the manner described in note 25(b). Our financial assets at FVTPL include its account receivable arising from sales of concentrate and derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments.
Financial liabilities and equity
Debt and equity instruments are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument.
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of SSR Mining after deducting all its liabilities.
Equity instruments issued by us are recognized at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Repurchase of our own equity instruments is recognized and deducted directly in equity. No gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, or cancellation of our own equity instruments. No gain or loss is recognized on the issue of our own equity instruments, unless the equity is issued to settle a liability.
Classification of financial liabilities
Financial liabilities that are not contingent consideration in a business combination, held for trading or designated as at FVTPL, are measured at amortized cost using effective interest method.
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges
We designate certain derivatives as hedging instruments in respect of foreign currency risk and commodity price risk as cash flow hedges. On initial designation of the derivative as a cash flow hedge, we document the relationship between the hedging instrument and hedged item, along with our risk management objectives and its strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. Furthermore, at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, we document whether the hedging instrument is effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 23


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
m)Financial instruments (continued)
The changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and determined to be effective in offsetting forecasted cash flows is recognized in OCI. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately as gain (loss) on derivatives in other (expense) income, net, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). When the forecasted transaction impacts earnings, the cumulative gains or losses that were recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI") are reclassified to earnings in the same line item as the recognized hedged item. When the forecasted transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset, the cumulative gains or losses that were recorded in AOCI are reclassified and included in the carrying amount of the asset.
When a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge expires or is sold and the forecasted transaction is still expected to occur, any cumulative gain or loss relating to the derivative that is recorded in AOCI at that time remains in AOCI and is recognized in the consolidated statements of income (loss) when the forecasted transaction occurs, in the same line item as the recognized hedged item. When the forecasted transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset, the cumulative gains or losses that were recorded in AOCI are removed from equity and included in the carrying amount of the asset. This transfer does not affect OCI.
We discontinue hedge accounting only when the hedging relationship (or part thereof) ceases to meet the qualifying criteria. This includes instances when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised. The discontinuation is accounted for prospectively. Any gain or loss recognized in OCI at that time remains in equity and is reclassified to the consolidated statements of income (loss) when the forecast transaction occurs. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the gain or loss is reclassified immediately to the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Non-hedge derivatives
Derivative instruments that do not qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings.
Impairment
We recognize a loss allowance for expected credit losses on its financial assets. At each reporting date, we measure the loss allowance for the financial asset at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses if the credit risk on the financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition. If at the reporting date, the financial asset has not increased significantly since initial recognition, we measure the loss allowance for the financial asset at an amount equal to twelve month expected credit losses.
n)Provisions
Provisions are liabilities that are uncertain in timing or amount. We record a provision when and only when:
(i)
We have a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event;
(ii)
It is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation; and
(iii)
A reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Constructive obligations are obligations that derive from our actions where:
(i)
By an established pattern of past practice, published policies or a sufficiently specific current statement, we have indicated to other parties that we will accept certain responsibilities; and
(ii)
As a result, we have created a valid expectation on the part of those other parties that we will discharge those responsibilities.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 24


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
n)Provisions (continued)

Provisions are reviewed at the end of each reporting period and adjusted or reversed to reflect management’s current best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period. If it is no longer probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, the provision is reversed. Provisions are reduced by actual expenditures for which the provision was originally recognized. Where discounting has been used, the carrying amount of a provision is accreted during the period to reflect the passage of time. This accretion expense is included in finance costs in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Reclamation and closure cost provision
We record a provision for the estimated future costs of reclamation and closure of operating, closed and inactive mines and development projects when environmental disturbance occurs or a constructive obligation arises. The provision for our Company’s reclamation and closure costs is accreted over time to reflect the unwinding of the discount with the accretion expense included in finance costs in the consolidated statements of income (loss). The provision for reclamation and closure costs is remeasured at the end of each reporting period for changes in estimates or circumstances. Changes in estimates or circumstances include changes in legal or regulatory requirements, increased obligations arising from additional mining and exploration activities, changes to cost estimates and changes to risk-free interest rates.

Reclamation and closure cost obligations relating to operating mines and development projects are initially recorded with a corresponding increase to the carrying amounts of related mining properties. Changes to the obligations which may arise as a result of changes in estimates and assumptions are also accounted for as changes in the carrying amounts of related mining properties, except where a reduction in the obligation is greater than the capitalized reclamation and closure costs, in which case, the capitalized reclamation and closure costs are reduced to nil and the remaining adjustment is included in production costs in the consolidated statements of income (loss). The provisions for reclamation and closure costs related to inactive and closed mines are included in production costs in the consolidated statements of income (loss) on initial recognition and subsequently when remeasured.
o)Leases
On January 1, 2019, we adopted IFRS 16 - Leases ("IFRS 16"), described further in note 2(t). We elected to apply IFRS 16 using a modified retrospective approach, therefore the comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under IAS 17 - Leases and the associated interpretive guidance ("IAS 17"). Under IAS 17, leases which transfer substantially all of the benefits and risks incidental to the ownership of property are accounted for as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalized at the lease commencement at the lower of the fair market value of the leased property and the net present value of the minimum lease payments. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charge. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases are depreciated over the shorter of the asset’s useful life and the lease term. All other leases are accounted for as operating leases wherein rental payments are expensed as incurred.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 25


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
p)Current accounting changes
New standards issued and adopted
IFRS 16
We adopted the requirements of IFRS 16, which replaced IAS 17, as of January 1, 2019. IFRS 16 applies a control model to the identification of leases, distinguishing between a lease and a service contract on the basis of whether the customer controls the asset. Control is considered to exist if the customer has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of an identified asset and the right to direct the use of that asset. For those assets determined to meet the definition of a lease, IFRS 16 introduces significant changes to the accounting by lessees, introducing a single, on-balance sheet accounting model that is similar to the accounting for finance leases under IAS 17, with limited exceptions for short-term leases or leases of low value assets.

We elected to apply IFRS 16 using a modified retrospective approach by recognizing the cumulative effect of adopting IFRS 16 as an adjustment to the opening consolidated statements of financial position at January 1, 2019. Therefore, the comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under IAS 17. In addition, in applying IFRS 16 for the first time, we elected to account for operating leases with a remaining lease term of less than twelve months as at January 1, 2019 as short-term leases.

Our lease accounting policy under IFRS 16 is provided below.

At inception of a contract, we assess whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease of the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset over a period of time in exchange for consideration. We assess whether the contract involves the use of an identified asset during the term of the contract and if we have the right to direct the use of the asset.

As a lessee, we recognize a right-of-use asset, which is included in mineral properties, plant and equipment, and a lease liability at the commencement date of the lease. The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which is comprised of the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, plus any decommissioning and restoration costs, less any lease incentives received.

A lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted by the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the incremental borrowing rate. The lease liability is subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Lease payments included in the measure of the lease liability comprise: fixed payments; variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate; amounts expected to be payable under any residual value guarantee, and the exercise price under any purchase option that we would be reasonably certain to exercise; lease payments in any optional renewal period if we are reasonably certain to exercise an extension option; and penalties for any early termination of a lease unless we are reasonably certain not to terminate early.

We have elected not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a lease term of twelve months or less and leases of low-value assets. Payments associated with short-term leases and all leases of low-value assets are recognized on a straight-line basis as an expense in profit or loss.

Right-of-use assets are generally depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life and the lease term on a straight-line basis. If the we are reasonably certain to exercise a purchase option, the right-of-use asset is depreciated over the underlying asset's useful life.


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 26


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
p)Current accounting changes (continued)
IFRS 16 (continued)
On adoption of IFRS 16, we recognized right-of-use assets of $4.3 million within mineral properties, plant and equipment and lease liabilities of $4.3 million as at January 1, 2019. The weighted average incremental borrowing rate for lease liabilities initially recognized as of January 1, 2019 was 7.5%.

IFRIC 23 - Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments

IFRIC 23 - Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments (the "Interpretation") provides guidance on the accounting for current and deferred tax liabilities and assets in circumstances in which there is uncertainty over income tax treatments. The Interpretation requires: (a) an entity to contemplate whether uncertain tax treatments should be considered separately, or together as a group, based on which approach provides better predictions of the resolution; (b) an entity to determine if it is probable that the tax authorities will accept the uncertain tax treatment; and (c) if it is not probable that the uncertain tax treatment will be accepted, measure the tax uncertainty based on the most likely amount or expected value, depending on whichever method better predicts the resolution of the uncertainty. We adopted the Interpretation in our consolidated financial statements for the annual period beginning on January 1, 2019. The adoption of the Interpretation did not impact the consolidated financial statements.
q)Future accounting changes
At this time, we do not expect future accounting changes to impact our significant accounting policies.
3.
AREAS OF JUDGMENT AND ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we make judgments in applying our accounting policies. The
judgments that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in our consolidated financial statements are outlined below. In addition, the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of estimates that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and related notes. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, having regard to previous experience, but actual results may differ materially from the amounts included in the consolidated financial statements. We have outlined below information about assumptions and other sources of estimation uncertainty as at December 31, 2019 that have a risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next year.
a)
Areas of Judgment
Assessment of impairment indicators

Judgment is required in assessing whether certain factors would be considered an indicator of impairment. We consider both internal and external information to determine whether there is an indicator of impairment present and, accordingly, whether impairment testing is required. The information we consider in assessing whether there is an indicator of impairment includes, but is not limited to, market and economic conditions, commodity prices, reserves and resources, mine plans and operating results, market transactions for similar assets and our market capitalization.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 27


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


3.
AREAS OF JUDGMENT AND ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY (continued)
a)
Areas of Judgment (continued)
Assessment of impairment indicators (continued)

At December 31, 2019, we assessed whether there were indicators of impairment present for our mineral properties, plant and equipment. As part of our assessment, we noted that total sustaining capital expenditures estimated in Puna Operations' 2019 LOM plan, which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2019, were significantly higher than the sustaining capital expenditures estimated in the 2016 Puna Operations Technical Report. The increase in the estimate of total sustaining capital expenditures over the LOM was considered to be an indicator of impairment. As a result, we performed an impairment assessment of Puna Operations as at December 31, 2019 (note 24).

Functional currency

We have determined the functional currency of each of our subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. The determination of a subsidiary’s functional currency requires significant judgment to determine the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of our entities if there is a change in events and conditions which determined the primary economic environment.

Determination of commencement of commercial production

The determination of when a mine is in the condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management (referred to as "commercial production") is a matter of significant judgment which impacts when we recognize revenue, operating costs and depreciation and depletion in our consolidated statements of income (loss). In making this determination, management considers whether (a) the major capital expenditures to bring the mine to the condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended was complete; (b) ramping up to nameplate design capacity has been achieved for the operations; (c) the mine and mill were meeting performance design criteria such as mining rates, haulage targets, hourly throughput and process recovery; and (d) a saleable product could be produced.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities

Judgment is required in assessing whether deferred tax assets and certain deferred tax liabilities are recognized on the balance sheet and what tax rate is expected to be applied in the year when the related temporary differences reverse. We also evaluate the recoverability of deferred tax assets based on an assessment of our ability to use the underlying future tax deductions. Deferred tax liabilities arising from temporary differences on investments in subsidiaries are recognized unless the reversal of the temporary differences is not expected to occur in the foreseeable future and can be controlled by us. Judgment is also required on the application of income tax legislation. We are subject to assessments by various taxation authorities, which may interpret legislation differently. These judgments are subject to risk and uncertainty and could result in an adjustment to the deferred tax provision and a corresponding credit or charge to profit.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 28


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


3.
AREAS OF JUDGMENT AND ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY (continued)
b)
Sources of Estimation Uncertainty
Recoverable amount of Puna Operations CGU

When impairment testing is required, discounted cash flow models are used to determine the recoverable amount of the applicable assets. In addition, if available, market transactions for comparable assets are considered in determining the recoverable amount of assets. The projected discounted cash flows are significantly affected by changes in assumptions related to metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and the foreign exchange rate. These inputs are based on our best estimates of what an independent market participant would consider appropriate. Changes in these inputs may impact the results of the impairment testing and the resulting carrying values of assets.

As described in note 3(a), we determined there was an indicator of impairment present at Puna Operations at December 31, 2019 and, therefore, we performed an impairment assessment. At December 31, 2019, the carrying amount of Puna Operations CGU was $141.9 million (December 31, 2018 - $131.0 million). We concluded there was no impairment (see note 24).

Recoverable amount of goodwill

A discounted cash flow model is used to determine the recoverable amount of the Seabee Gold Operation CGU when performing the annual impairment test for goodwill. The projected cash flows are significantly affected by assumptions related to metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and a Canadian dollar ("CAD") to U.S. dollar ("USD") foreign exchange rate. Note 10 outlines the significant inputs used when performing our goodwill impairment testing. These inputs are based on our best estimates of what an independent market participant would consider appropriate. There is a risk that changes in these inputs may result in a material adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill within the next year.

The carrying amount of goodwill was $49.8 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

We estimate Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources based on information prepared by qualified persons as defined by NI 43-101. Mineral Reserves are used in the calculation of depletion, depreciation, in performing impairment testing and for forecasting the timing of the payment of reclamation and closure costs, and future taxes. In assessing the LOM for accounting purposes, Mineral Resources are only taken into account where there is a high degree of confidence of economic extraction. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating Mineral Reserves, and assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly when new information becomes available. Changes in the forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs or recovery rates may, ultimately, result in Mineral Reserves estimates being revised. Such changes in Mineral Reserves could impact depletion and depreciation rates, asset carrying values and the provision for reclamation and closure costs.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 29


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


3.
AREAS OF JUDGMENT AND ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY (continued)
b)
Sources of Estimation Uncertainty (continued)
Valuation of inventory
The measurement of inventory, including the determination of its NRV, especially as it relates to ore in stockpiles and leach paid inventory, involves the use of estimates.
The NRV of inventory is calculated as the estimated price at the time of sale based on prevailing and forecast metal prices less estimated future production costs to convert the inventory into saleable form and associated selling costs. In addition, in determining the value of the leach pad inventory, we make estimates of quantities and grades of ore stacked on leach pads and in-process, and the recoverable gold in this material to determine the total inventory. Changes in these estimates can result in a change in carrying amounts of inventory, as well as cost of sales. The determination of forecast sales price, recovery rates, grade, assumed contained metal in stockpiles and leach pad inventory and production and selling costs requires significant assumptions that may impact the stated value of our inventory.
Depletion and depreciation
We use the units of production method to deplete mineral properties, whereby depletion is calculated using the quantity of ounces extracted from the mine in the period as a percentage of the total quantity of ounces expected to be extracted in current and future periods. Other assets are depreciated, net of residual value, using the straight-line method over the useful life of the equipment.
The calculation of the unit of production rate and the useful life and residual values of capital assets, and therefore the annual depletion and depreciation expense, could be materially affected by changes in the underlying estimates. Changes in estimates can be the result of changes in our mine plans, differences between estimated and actual costs of mining and differences in the gold price used in the estimation of Mineral Reserves.
Estimate of reclamation and closure costs

Our provision for reclamation and closure cost obligations represents management's best estimate of the present value of the future cash outflows required to settle the liability which reflects estimates of future costs, the timing of the cash flows associated with the future costs, inflation and movements in foreign exchange rates when liabilities are anticipated to be settled in a currency other than the United States dollar. Cost estimates can vary in response to many factors including changes to the relevant legal requirements, whether closure plans achieve intended reclamation goals, the emergence of new restoration techniques or experience at other mine sites, local inflation rates and foreign exchange rates. The expected timing of expenditures can also change, for example, in response to changes in Mineral Reserves, production rates or economic conditions. Our assumptions are reviewed at the end of each reporting period and adjusted to reflect management's current best estimate and changes in any of the above factors can result in a material change to the provision recognized by us. At December 31, 2019, our total provision for reclamation and closure cost obligations was $84.2 million (December 31, 2018 - $62.2 million).




SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 30


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


4.
ACQUISITION OF NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

On May 31, 2017, we formed a jointly owned company with Golden Arrow called Puna Operations for the development of the Chinchillas property. The jointly owned company, holding the Pirquitas and Chinchillas properties, was owned 75% by SSR Mining and operated by SSR Mining.

On September 18, 2019, we acquired Golden Arrow's 25% interest in Puna Operations for aggregate consideration of $32,364,000, consisting of $2,261,000 of cash, the extinguishment of the loan to Golden Arrow and related interest of $11,369,000, the issuance of $18,218,000 of our common shares, and the transfer of shares in Golden Arrow we owned, with a fair value of $516,000, for cancellation.

As the acquisition did not result in a change of control, the acquisition was accounted for as an equity transaction
whereby the non-controlling interest of $33,981,000 in Puna Operations recognized by us prior to the acquisition was adjusted to nil in our consolidated statements of financial position. Further, the difference of $1,617,000 between the carrying value of the non-controlling interest in Puna Operations at the time of acquisition and the fair value of the consideration paid to Golden Arrow of $32,364,000 million was recognized in equity. In addition, transaction costs we incurred in connection with the transaction of $154,000 were recognized as a reduction of equity.

5.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Cash
$
164,470

$
209,518

Short-term investments
339,177

209,694

 
$
503,647

$
419,212


6.
TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Trade receivables
$
54,164

$
11,287

Value added tax receivables
10,944

12,811

Prepayments and deposits
15,478

10,880

Income tax receivable
3,489

2,947

Other taxes receivable
2,368

4,274

Other
863

642

 
$
87,306

$
42,841


No provision for credit loss was recognized at December 31, 2019 or 2018. All trade receivables are expected to be settled within twelve months. Credit risk is further discussed in note 26(b).


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 31


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


7.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Balance, beginning of year
$
29,542

$
114,001

Additions
5,355

25,456

Disposals
(3,534
)
(63,445
)
Gain (loss) recognized on acquisition at fair value
757

(2,782
)
Fair value adjustments
34,333

(43,688
)
Balance, end of year
$
66,453

$
29,542


Additions to marketable securities for the year ended December 31, 2019 includes the purchase of 0.8 million common shares of SilverCrest Metals Inc. ("SilverCrest") for total consideration of $3.4 million.

During 2018, we purchased 8.2 million common shares of SilverCrest for total consideration of $23.1 million and sold our remaining position of 9.0 million common shares of Pretium Resources Inc. ("Pretium") for pre-tax cash proceeds of approximately $63.4 million.

The fair value adjustments in 2019 and 2018 relate primarily to the changes in the value of SilverCrest common shares and Pretium common shares, respectively.


8.
INVENTORIES
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Finished goods
$
14,141

$
23,433

Stockpiled ore
18,155

18,195

Leach pad inventory
171,768

162,335

Materials and supplies
35,354

30,791

 
239,418

234,754

Non-current materials and supplies
(1,848
)
(2,006
)
 
$
237,570

$
232,748


As at December 31, 2019, we have recognized a provision of $3,297,000 (2018 - $3,436,000) for obsolete materials and supplies inventory.





SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


9.
MINERAL PROPERTIES, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 
December 31, 2019
 
Plant and equipment (1) (2)

Mineral properties subject to depletion

Mineral properties not yet subject to depletion

Exploration and evaluation assets

Total

Cost
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of year
$
621,882

$
463,548

$
101,990

$
91,228

$
1,278,648

Additions
82,151

42,373

7,145

35,275

166,944

Disposals
(12,457
)
(2,962
)
—

(434
)
(15,853
)
Change in reclamation and closure cost provision
—

7,580

—

1,072

8,652

Transfers
—

28,839

(28,839
)
—

—

Balance, end of year
691,576

539,378

80,296

127,141

1,438,391

 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated depreciation and depletion
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of year
(338,153
)
(239,320
)
—

—

(577,473
)
Depreciation and depletion
(48,226
)
(55,783
)
—

—

(104,009
)
Disposals
10,981

1,572

 
 
12,553

Balance, end of year
(375,398
)
(293,531
)
—

—

(668,929
)
Net book value at December 31, 2019
$
316,178

$
245,847

$
80,296

$
127,141

$
769,462


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 33


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


9.
MINERAL PROPERTIES, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)

 
December 31, 2018
 
Plant and equipment (1)(2)

Mineral properties subject to depletion

Mineral properties not yet subject to depletion 

Exploration and evaluation assets

Total

Cost
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of year
$
545,090

$
393,273

$
121,854

$
91,579

$
1,151,796

Additions
102,275

33,371

13,771

956

150,373

Disposals
(16,331
)
—

—

(1,307
)
(17,638
)
Removal of fully depreciated/depleted assets
(9,152
)
—

—

—

(9,152
)
Change in reclamation and closure cost provision
—

3,269

—

—

3,269

Transfers
—

33,635

(33,635
)
—

—

Balance, end of year
621,882

463,548

101,990

91,228

1,278,648

 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated depreciation and depletion
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of year
(315,261
)
(177,906
)
—

—

(493,167
)
Depreciation and depletion
(44,772
)
(61,414
)
—

—

(106,186
)
Disposals
12,728

—

—

—

12,728

Removal of fully depreciated/depleted assets
9,152

—

 
 
9,152

Balance, end of year
(338,153
)
(239,320
)
—

—

(577,473
)
Net book value at December 31, 2018
$
283,729

$
224,228

$
101,990

$
91,228

$
701,175


(1) 
Includes assets under construction of $28,208,000 at December 31, 2019 (2018 - $44,858,000).
 
(2) 
On January 1, 2019, we adopted IFRS 16. At December 31, 2019, plant and equipment includes right-of-use assets with a cost of $4,584,000 and related accumulated amortization of $1,082,000.







SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 34


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


10.
GOODWILL

In connection with the acquisition of the Seabee Gold Operation in 2016, we recognized goodwill of $49,786,000. In accordance with IAS 36 - Impairment of Assets, we performed the annual goodwill impairment test at December 31, 2019. For the purposes of the goodwill impairment test, the recoverable amount of the Seabee Gold Operation, which is considered to be the CGU, has been determined using a FVLCTD calculation.

A discounted cash flow model is used to determine the FVLCTD amount of the Seabee Gold Operation CGU. The projected cash flows are significantly affected by assumptions related to metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, future operating costs and capital expenditures, the discount rate and CAD to USD foreign exchange rate. These inputs are based on our best estimates of what an independent market participant would consider appropriate. Projected cash flows under the discounted cash flow model are after-tax and discounted using an estimated weighted average cost of capital of a market participant adjusted for asset specific risks. Commodity prices and the foreign exchange rate used to project cash flows were based on observable market or publicly available data, including forward prices and analyst forecasts.

The discounted cash flow model uses a long-term gold price of $1,392 per ounce and a long-term foreign exchange rate of $1.29 CAD to USD $1.00. The model also uses a post-tax real discount rate adjusted for asset specific risks of 5.6%. At December 31, 2019, the calculated recoverable amount of the Seabee Gold Operation CGU exceeded the carrying value, and therefore no impairment charge has been recorded.

11.
OTHER ASSETS - NON-CURRENT
 
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Deferred consideration on sale of mineral properties
$
12,332

$
11,289

Value added tax receivables
10,472

5,991

Other taxes receivable
3,143

—

Restricted cash
2,339

2,035

Non-current inventories (note 8)
1,848

2,006

Loan receivable from joint venture partner (note 4)
—

8,214

Other investments
1,000

—

 
$
31,134

$
29,535



SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 35


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


12.
CURRENT AND DEFERRED INCOME TAX

The following table represents the major components of income tax expense (recovery) recognized in the consolidated statement of income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Current tax expense
$
24,796

$
8,043

Deferred tax expense
5,576

78

Total income tax expense
$
30,372

$
8,121


Income tax expense differs from the amount that would be computed by applying the Canadian statutory rate of 27% (2018- 27%) to income before income taxes. The reasons for the differences are as follows:

Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Income before taxes
$
86,129

$
8,090

Statutory tax rate
27.00
%
27.00
%
Expected income tax
$
23,254

$
2,184

 
 
 
Increase (decrease) attributable to:
 
 
Non-deductible (taxable) items
(17,654
)
25,408

Foreign exchange
15,058

(13,714
)
Differences in foreign and future tax rates
(3,309
)
(1,086
)
Mining and overseas withholding tax
10,249

4,955

Expired losses
738

2,928

Restructuring of Argentine operations
—

114,100

Change in tax estimates with respect to prior years
(2,316
)
1,501

Changes in recognition of deferred tax assets
3,952

(128,066
)
Other
400

(89
)
Total income tax expense
$
30,372

$
8,121


Restructuring of Argentine Operations

In May 2018, we restructured our Argentine operations by recharacterizing our intercompany loan to equity and transferring the Chinchillas assets into the same wholly-owned subsidiary of Puna Operations that holds the Pirquitas plant. The restructuring was designed to increase the efficiency and administration of the operation and reduce the risk related to historic tax positions. The restructuring resulted in the elimination of previously unrecognized deferred tax assets resulting in a movement in deferred tax not recognized of $125.7 million and a change to tax expense of $114.1 million reflecting the recharacterization of the intercompany loan to equity, an increase in tax basis of mining assets, and current tax expense of $4.7 million in 2018.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 36


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


12.
CURRENT AND DEFERRED INCOME TAX (continued)

The significant components of deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are presented below:
As at December 31
2019

2018

Deferred income tax assets
 
 
Deductible temporary differences relating to:
 
 
Marketable securities
$
—

$
1,038

Inventories
2,241

—

Reclamation and closure cost provision
4,760

3,354

Deductibility of other taxes
9,242

9,445

Other items
9,917

10,124

 
26,160

23,961

Tax loss carry forwards and tax credits
9,919

15,361

Total deferred income tax assets
$
36,079

$
39,322

 
 
 
Deferred income tax liabilities
 
 
Taxable temporary differences relating to:
 
 
Marketable securities
(4,118
)
—

Inventories
(4,138
)
(3,511
)
Mineral properties, plant and equipment
(98,438
)
(92,686
)
Convertible notes
(15,046
)
(2,236
)
Mineral and foreign withholding tax
(40,462
)
(41,143
)
Other items
(1,629
)
(132
)
Total deferred income tax liabilities
$
(163,831
)
$
(139,708
)
 
 
 
Balance sheet presentation
 
 
Deferred income tax assets
$
63

$
7,523

Deferred income tax liabilities
(127,815
)
(107,909
)
Deferred income tax liabilities, net
$
(127,752
)
$
(100,386
)


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 37


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


12.
CURRENT AND DEFERRED INCOME TAX (continued)

As at December 31, 2019, an aggregate deferred tax liability of $13,952,000 (December 31, 2018 - $17,617,000) for temporary differences of $46,507,000 (December 31, 2018 - $58,724,000) related to investments in subsidiaries was not recognized as we control the dividend policy of our subsidiaries (i.e., we control the timing of reversal of the related taxable temporary differences and we are satisfied that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future).

We recognize tax benefits on losses or other deductible amounts generated in countries where we determine that it is probable that taxable profits will be available to be utilized against those temporary differences. Our unrecognized deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset is recognized consist of the following amounts:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Mineral properties, plant and equipment
$
4,850

$
3,330

Reclamation and closure cost provision
46,418

30,677

Tax loss carry forwards and tax credits
15,192

7,962

Mineral and foreign withholding tax
616

567

Other items
6,913

3,883

Unrecognized deductible temporary differences
$
73,989

$
46,419


At December 31, 2019, we had the following estimated tax operating losses available to reduce future taxable income, including both losses for which deferred tax assets are utilized to offset applicable deferred tax liabilities and losses for which deferred tax assets are not recognized as listed in the table above. Losses expire at various dates and amounts between 2020 and 2039.

As at December 31, 2019
 

Argentina
$
1,193

Mexico
43,517

Peru
71

Canada
2,541

U.S.A.
7,433

Tax operating losses
$
54,755




SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 38


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


13.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Trade payables
$
33,579

$
15,896

Accrued liabilities (1)
54,911

43,596

Income taxes payable
12,767

8,463

Royalties payable
3,528

4,542

Moratorium liability (note 16)
3,537

4,570

Derivative liabilities
—

2,798

Accrued interest on convertible notes (note 14(a))
2,803

3,178

 
$
111,125

$
83,043


(1)Accrued liabilities includes $446,000 recognized for lease liabilities under IFRS 16.

14.
DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITY

a)
Debt
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

2013 Notes
$
114,280

$
247,551

2019 Notes
169,769

—

Total carrying amount of convertible debt
284,049

247,551

Less: current portion of debt
$
(114,280
)
$
—

Non-current portion of debt outstanding
$
169,769

$
247,551


On March 19, 2019, we issued $230,000,000 of unsecured convertible senior notes due in 2039 (the “2019 Notes”) for net proceeds of $222,932,000 after payment of commissions and expenses related to the offering of $7,067,000. The 2019 Notes mature on April 1, 2039 and bear an interest rate of 2.50% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. The 2019 Notes are convertible into our common shares at a fixed conversion rate, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, if certain fundamental changes occur, holders of the 2019 Notes may be entitled to an increased conversion rate. The 2019 Notes are convertible into our common shares at an initial conversion rate of 54.1082 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Notes converted, representing an initial conversion price of $18.48 per common share.
Prior to April 1, 2023, we may not redeem the 2019 Notes, except in the event of certain changes in Canadian tax law. On or after April 1, 2023 and prior to April 1, 2026 we may redeem all or part of the 2019 Notes for cash, but only if the last reported sales price of our common shares for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days exceeds 130% of the conversion price in effect on each such trading day. On or after April 1, 2026, we may redeem the 2019 Notes in full or in part, for cash.
Holders of the 2019 Notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or part of their 2019 Notes on April 1 of each of 2026, 2029 and 2034, or upon certain fundamental corporate changes. The repurchase price will be equal to 100% of the 2019 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the repurchase date.
The proceeds of the 2019 Notes have been bifurcated between their debt and equity components. The fair value of the debt portion of $169,365,000 was estimated using a discounted cash flow model method based on an expected life of seven years and a discount rate of 7.5%. The residual of $44,766,000 ($60,635,000 less deferred tax liability of $15,869,000) was allocated to equity. The debt portion has been recorded at amortized cost, net of transaction costs, and is being accreted to face value over the expected life using the effective interest method.


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 39


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


14.
DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITY (continued)

a)
Debt (continued)

The transaction costs of the issuance of the 2019 Notes of $7,068,000 have been allocated on a pro rata basis with $5,205,000 to debt and $1,863,000 to equity.

At December 31, 2018, we had $265,000,000 of senior convertible unsecured notes (the "2013 Notes") outstanding.

On March 19, 2019, the Company repurchased $150,000,000 of the 2013 Notes for a cash payment of $152,250,000. The redemption amount was bifurcated into the debt and equity components of the 2013 Notes purchased. The fair value of the debt portion of $148,000,000 was estimated using a discounted cash flow model based on a maturity date of February 1, 2020 and a discount rate of 4.95%. The difference between this amount and the book value of the redeemed 2013 Notes of $5,423,000 was recognized in the consolidated statements of income (loss) along with the related tax recovery of $1,687,000 and the residual of $4,825,000 was allocated to equity.
At December 30, 2019, holders of our 2013 Notes had the right to surrender their 2013 Notes for purchase by us at their option (the "Put Option") pursuant to the terms of the Indenture governing the 2013 Notes (the "Indenture") any time before January 31, 2020. As of December 30, 2019, there was $115,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the 2013 Notes outstanding. On January 31, 2020, as of the expiration of the Put Option, $49,000 aggregate principal amount of the 2013 Notes were validly surrendered for purchase. The remaining outstanding 2013 Notes are callable by us at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, at any time at our election giving due notice, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Indenture. On February 13, 2020, we provided notice of redemption to call the remaining outstanding 2013 Notes. We will redeem all of our outstanding 2013 Notes on March 30, 2020 totaling an aggregate principal amount of $114,947,000 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, unless any of the outstanding 2013 Notes are converted into common shares of the Company in accordance with the terms of the 2013 Notes. Following the redemption of the 2013 Notes, no 2013 Notes will remain outstanding.
The table below provides a summary of changes in the debt balance:
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Balance, beginning of year
$
250,729

$
236,358

Accretion of discount
14,320

14,371

Interest accrued
8,729

7,619

Interest paid
(9,104
)
(7,619
)
Redemption of 2013 Notes
(141,982
)
—

Issuance of 2019 Notes
164,160

—

Balance, end of year
286,852

250,729

Accrued interest outstanding (note 14)
(2,803
)
(3,178
)
Carrying value of Notes outstanding
$
284,049

$
247,551

 
 
 
Classified as:
 
 
   Current
$
114,280

$
—

   Non-current
169,769

247,551

 
$
284,049

$
247,551


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 40


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


14.
DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITY (continued)

b)Credit facility

On August 4, 2015, we entered into a $75,000,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Facility may be used for reclamation bonding, working capital and other general corporate purposes. During 2017, we extended the maturity of our Credit Facility to June 8, 2020, and concurrently reduced applicable margins, increased covenant flexibility and added a $25,000,000 accordion feature.

Amounts that are borrowed under the Credit Facility will incur variable interest at London Interbank Offered Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 2.25% to 3.75% determined based on our net leverage ratio. The Credit Facility also provides for financial letters of credit at 66% of the applicable margin and undrawn fees are 22.5% of the applicable margin.

All debts, liabilities and obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by our material subsidiaries and secured by certain of our assets, certain of our material subsidiaries, and pledges of the securities of our material subsidiaries. In connection with the Credit Facility, we must also maintain certain net tangible worth and ratios for interest coverage and net leverage. As at December 31, 2019 we were in compliance with these covenants.

As at December 31, 2019, we had utilized $580,000 (December 31, 2018 - $8,000,000) of the Credit Facility to support certain obligations arising under workers compensation insurance.

15.
RECLAMATION AND CLOSURE COST PROVISION

Changes to the reclamation and closure cost provision during the years ended December 31 were as follows:
 
2019

2018

Balance, beginning of year
$
62,172

$
58,330

Obligations assumed on acquisition of mining properties (1)
12,990

—

Reclamation expenditures
(3,568
)
(852
)
Accretion expense (note 21)
3,743

3,459

Foreign exchange gain (loss)
308

(504
)
Revisions in estimates and obligations
8,658

1,739

Obligations related to divested mining properties
(68
)
—

Balance, end of year
84,235

62,172

Less: current portion
(8,766
)
(211
)
Non-current reclamation and closure cost provision
$
75,469

$
61,961


(1) 
On June 27, 2019, we acquired 8,900 hectares of land contiguous to the Marigold mine in Nevada, U.S., net of a 0.5% net smelter returns royalty. The consideration included $22,000,000 in cash and the assumption of related non-current environmental and reclamation obligations then valued at approximately $12,990,000.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 41


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


15.
RECLAMATION AND CLOSURE COST PROVISION (continued)

The reclamation and closure cost provision is calculated as the present value of estimated future net cash outflows based on the following key assumptions:

▪
Discount rates used in discounting the estimated reclamation and closure cost provision range between 1.8% and 9.9% for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018 - 2.3% and 9.9%).
▪
The majority of the expenditures are expected to occur between 2029 and 2038.
▪
A 1% change in the discount rate would increase or decrease the provision on a consolidated basis by approximately $11,087,000, while holding other assumptions consistent.

16.
OTHER LIABILITIES - NON-CURRENT
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Moratorium liability
$
5,583

$
14,487

Lease liabilities
3,346

—

 
$
8,929

$
14,487


On March 31, 2017, we entered into the tax moratorium system in Argentina resolving the dispute concerning export duties payable. The tax moratorium system outlines the terms of repayment, including the total amount of the obligation and the interest rate on outstanding amounts. Outstanding Argentine peso amounts are subject to interest at a minimum rate of 1.5% per month.

With our entry into the tax moratorium system for resolution of our export duty dispute, we are no longer challenging the legality of the application of the export duty other than with respect to our right for reimbursement of $6,646,000 of export duties paid prior to entering into the tax moratorium system.
 

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 42


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


17.
SHARE CAPITAL AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
a)Authorized capital
We have unlimited authorized common shares with no par value.
The 2017 Share Compensation Plan provides for treasury settlement up to an aggregate total of 6.5% of our issued and outstanding common shares.
b)Stock options
Our existing incentive plan, approved by our shareholders, under which options to purchase common shares may be granted to officers, employees and others at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The exercise price of each option is set at the date of grant and shall not be less than the closing market price of our stock on the award date. The expiry date for all grants may not exceed the earlier of 7 years after the grant date and the latest date permitted under the rules of the regulatory authorities. Currently, the vesting periods range up to three years, and the term is seven years. New shares from treasury are issued on the exercise of stock options.
The changes in stock options issued during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
 
2019
2018
 
Number of stock options

Weighted average exercise price (C$/option)

Number of stock options

Weighted average exercise price (C$/option)

Outstanding, beginning of year
2,638,749

10.35

2,976,360

9.35

     Granted
514,355

16.81

668,664

11.84

     Exercised
(1,093,844
)
(8.78
)
(899,050
)
(7.79
)
     Expired
(193,167
)
(18.90
)
(56,700
)
(14.15
)
     Forfeited
(63,470
)
(12.81
)
(50,525
)
(12.70
)
Outstanding, end of year
1,802,623

12.14

2,638,749

10.35

During the year ended December 31, 2019, options granted to officers and employees had exercise prices ranging from C$16.50 to C$17.63 (December 31, 2018 - C$11.07 to C$13.39) and expiry dates ranging from January 1, 2026 to April 1, 2026.
As of December 31, 2019, incentive stock options constitute 1.5% (2018 - 2.2%) of issued and outstanding common share capital. The aggregate intrinsic value of vested share options (market value less exercise price) at December 31, 2019 was $17,831,000 (December 31, 2018 - $11,898,000).

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 43


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


17.
SHARE CAPITAL AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (continued)
The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2019 and year ended December 31, 2018 were estimated to be C$6.22 and C$5.06 per stock option, respectively, at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, based on the following assumptions:
Years ended December 31
2019
2018
Forfeiture rate (%)
3.0
3.0
Dividend yield (%)
—
—
Average risk-free interest rate (%)
1.78
1.88
Expected life (years)
4.2
4.2
Volatility (%)
45.8
55.8
Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. The expected life of the options considered such factors as the average length of time similar option grants in the past have remained outstanding prior to exercise and the vesting period of the grants. Volatility was estimated based upon historical price observations over the expected term. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the estimated fair value of the options.
The weighted average share price, at the date of grant, of stock options granted in 2019 was C$16.81 (2018 - C$11.84).
The weighted average share price at the date of the exercise of stock options in 2019 was C$18.37 (2018 - C$14.13).
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2019:
 
Stock options outstanding
 
Stock options exercisable
 
Exercise prices (C$)
Stock options outstanding

Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)

Stock options exercisable

Weighted average exercise price
(C$/option)

5.83 - 10.18
438,514

2.8

438,514

7.01

10.19 - 11.63
357,458

4.0

130,022

11.04

11.64 - 15.31
503,876

4.3

218,753

12.69

15.32 - 17.63
502,775

6.0

—

—

 
1,802,623

4.4

787,289

9.25

c)Deferred Share Units
Non-executive directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their annual compensation in the form of DSUs which are linked to the value of our common shares. DSUs are issued on a quarterly basis under the terms of the DSU Plan, at the market value of our common shares at the date of grant. DSUs vest immediately and are redeemable in cash on the date the director ceases to be our director.

 
2019

2018

Years ended December 31
Number of DSUs

Number of DSUs

Outstanding, beginning of year
533,698

608,763

   Granted
79,919

107,318

   Redeemed
—

(182,383
)
Outstanding, end of year
613,617

533,698


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 44


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


17.
SHARE CAPITAL AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (continued)
c)Deferred Share Units (continued)
DSUs granted in the year ended December 31, 2019 had a weighted average fair value of C$17.90 per unit at the date of grant (2018 - C$12.49). DSUs are cash-settled instruments and, therefore, the fair value of the outstanding DSUs at the end of each reporting period is recognized as an accrued liability with the associated compensation expense recorded in general and administrative expenses. As at December 31, 2019, the fair value of outstanding DSUs was C$24.99 per unit (December 31, 2018 - C$16.50 per unit).
At December 31, 2019, an accrued liability of $11,807,000 (2018 - $6,455,000) relating to DSUs has been recognized.
d) Restricted Share Units
RSUs are granted to employees based on the value of our share price at the date of grant. The awards have a graded vesting schedule over a three-year period. The terms of the plan provide the Board of Directors the discretion to elect to settle the units in either cash or shares.
To date, RSUs have been cash-settled and, therefore, are recognized as a liability, with fair value re-measurement at each reporting period. The associated compensation expense is recorded in general and administrative expenses unless directly attributable to our operations, whereby it is included in production costs, or exploration, evaluation and reclamation expense.
 
2019

2018

 Years ended December 31
Number of RSUs

Number of RSUs

Outstanding, beginning of year
425,095

541,006

     Granted
195,530

322,935

     Settled
(200,671
)
(276,983
)
     Forfeited
(63,794
)
(161,863
)
Outstanding, end of year
356,160

425,095

RSUs granted in the year ended December 31, 2019 had a weighted average fair value of C$18.14 per unit at the date of grant (2018 - C$11.47 per unit). RSUs settled in the year ended December 31, 2019 were settled at a fair value of C$17.67 per unit (2018 - C$12.33). As at December 31, 2019, the fair value of outstanding RSUs was C$24.99 per unit (December 31, 2018 - C$16.50 per unit).
At December 31, 2019, an accrued liability of $4,003,000 (2018 - $2,949,000) relating to RSUs has been recognized.
e)     Performance Share Units
PSUs are granted to senior executives, and vest after a performance period of three years. The vesting of these awards is based on our total shareholder return in comparison to our peer group and awards vested range from 0% to 200% of initial PSUs granted. Under the terms of our 2017 Share Compensation Plan, our Board of Directors have the discretion to elect to settle PSUs in either cash or shares.
On February 22, 2019, our Board of Directors indicated its intention to settle all of the PSUs issued under our 2017 Share Compensation Plan, when vested, in common shares of SSR Mining.
Prior to this date, based on our past history of settling PSUs in cash, we had accounted for our obligations as a liability. As a result of this change, the value of the relevant outstanding PSUs was fixed at that date and the existing liability of $1,764,000 ($1,284,000, net of tax) was transferred to the share-based compensation reserve of shareholders' equity. The unamortized value of $4,652,000 relating to these PSUs will be amortized over the remaining vesting periods.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 45


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


17.
SHARE CAPITAL AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (continued)
e)     Performance Share Units (continued)
PSUs granted prior to those under the 2017 Share Compensation Plan were accounted for as cash-settled and, therefore, were recognized as a liability, with fair value re-measurement at each reporting period. The associated compensation cost is recorded in general and administrative expenses.
 
2019

2018

Years ended December 31
Number of PSUs

Number of PSUs

Outstanding, beginning of year
311,100

391,432

     Granted
144,500

174,900

     Settled
(122,300
)
(255,232
)
     Forfeited
(24,800
)
—

Outstanding, end of year
308,500

311,100

PSUs granted in the year ended December 31, 2019 had a weighted average fair value of C$15.22 per unit at the date of grant (2018 - C$10.72 per unit). PSUs settled in the year ended December 31, 2019 were settled at a value of C$23.43 per unit (December 31, 2018 - C$23.09). As at December 31, 2019, the estimated weighted average value was C$39.60 per unit (2018 - C$26.76 per unit).
At December 31, 2019, an accrued liability of $3,729,000 (2018 - $7,230,000) related to PSUs has been recognized.
f)    Share-based compensation
Total share-based compensation, including all equity and cash-settled arrangements, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 has been recognized in the consolidated financial statements as follows:

Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Equity-settled
 
 
Production costs
$
250

$
160

General and administrative expense
3,715

1,958

Exploration, evaluation and reclamation expense
40

39

Cash-settled
 
 
Production costs
1,201

1,024

General and administrative expense
9,099

11,412

Exploration, evaluation and reclamation expense
119

125

 
$
14,424

$
14,718




SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 46


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


18.
OTHER RESERVES

Total other reserves for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 has been recognized in the consolidated financial statements as follows:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Foreign currency translation reserve
 
 
At beginning and end of year
$
781

$
781

 
 
 
Revaluation reserves
 
 
At beginning of year
(37,240
)
3,353

Gain (loss) on marketable securities at FVTOCI, net of tax
29,819

(37,686
)
Unrealized gain (loss) on effective portion of derivative, net of tax
2,226

(2,907
)
At end of year
(5,195
)
(37,240
)
 
 
 
Share-based compensation reserve
 
 
At beginning of year
49,696

50,404

Stock options exercised
(2,804
)
(2,864
)
Transfer of equity-settled PSUs
1,356

—

Share-based compensation
4,005

2,156

At end of year
52,253

49,696

 
 
 
Other
 
 
At beginning of year
(29,540
)
(29,540
)
Acquisition of non-controlling interest (note 4)
1,463

—

At end of year
(28,077
)
(29,540
)
 
 
 
Total Other Reserves
$
19,762

$
(16,303
)

19.
REVENUE

Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Gold bullion and doré sales
$
461,463

$
365,996

Concentrate sales
144,861

57,461

Other (1)
526

(2,782
)
 
$
606,850

$
420,675


(1) 
Other revenue includes the impact of changes in the fair value of concentrate trade receivables classified as FVTPL.


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 47


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


20.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Salaries and benefits
$
11,041

$
12,157

Share-based compensation
12,814

13,371

Consulting and professional fees
2,391

3,036

Travel expense
1,100

1,044

Depreciation and amortization
460

194

Other expenses
3,123

3,139

 
$
30,929

$
32,941


21.
FINANCE INCOME AND EXPENSES
a)Interest and other finance income
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Interest income
$
11,111

$
9,219

Accretion income on deferred consideration
799

2,542

 
$
11,910

$
11,761


b)Interest expense and other finance expenses
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Interest expense on convertible notes (note 14)
$
(23,049
)
$
(21,990
)
Accretion of reclamation and closure cost provision (note 15)
(3,743
)
(3,459
)
Interest expense on moratorium liability
(2,542
)
(6,212
)
Other
(2,264
)
(1,969
)
 
$
(31,598
)
$
(33,630
)

22.
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME

Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Write-down/loss on disposal of mineral properties, plant and equipment
$
(1,018
)
$
(5,344
)
Gain (loss) on derivatives
2,243

(2,782
)
Write-down of deferred consideration asset
(3,677
)
—

Other
(3,287
)
(966
)
 
$
(5,739
)
$
(9,092
)



SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 48


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


23.
INCOME PER SHARE

The calculations of basic and diluted income per share attributable to our equity holders for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are based on the following:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

 
 
 
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
121,769

120,137

Adjustments for dilutive instruments:
 
 
   Stock options (thousands)
892

1,217

Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
122,661

121,354


The outstanding 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future were not included in the calculation of diluted income per share for the year ended December 31, 2019 because they were anti-dilutive.

24.
OPERATING SEGMENTS

Operating results of operating segments are reviewed by our chief operating decision maker ("CODM") to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance. We consider each individual operating mine site as a reportable operating segment for financial reporting purposes. In addition, exploration and evaluation projects have been aggregated into a single reportable segment as they all have similar characteristics and do not exceed the quantitative thresholds for individual disclosure.

The following is a summary of the reported amounts of income from mine operations, operating income (loss), income (loss) before income taxes and the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities by operating segment:

Year ended and at December 31, 2019
Marigold mine

Seabee Gold Operation

Puna Operations (1)

Exploration, evaluation and development properties

Other reconciling items (2)

Total

Revenue
$
315,320

$
146,141

$
145,389

$
—

$
—

$
606,850

Production costs
(183,782
)
(48,470
)
(97,558
)
—

—

(329,810
)
Depletion and depreciation
(52,291
)
(36,368
)
(17,498
)
—

—

(106,157
)
Cost of sales
(236,073
)
(84,838
)
(115,056
)
—

—

(435,967
)
Income from mine operations
79,247

61,303

30,333

—

—

170,883

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exploration, evaluation and reclamation expenses
(4,139
)
(8,511
)
(818
)
(3,501
)
(647
)
(17,616
)
Operating income (loss)
73,829

52,371

27,578

(3,549
)
(27,891
)
122,338

Income (loss) before income tax
58,269

40,851

12,652

(2,937
)
(22,706
)
86,129

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
$
524,113

$
484,750

$
270,633

$
115,191

$
355,420

$
1,750,107

Non-current assets
249,962

310,578

155,049

114,327

20,529

850,445

Total liabilities
(119,413
)
(97,131
)
(70,676
)
(6,216
)
(322,717
)
(616,153
)


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 49


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


24.
OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)

Year ended and at December 31, 2018
Marigold mine

Seabee Gold Operation

Puna Operations

Exploration, evaluation and development properties

Other reconciling items (1)

Total

Revenue
$
250,341

$
115,655

$
54,679

$
—

$
—

$
420,675

Production costs
(143,380
)
(46,054
)
(55,677
)
—

—

(245,111
)
Depletion and depreciation
(56,748
)
(38,818
)
(3,153
)
—

—

(98,719
)
Cost of sales
(200,128
)
(84,872
)
(58,830
)
—

—

(343,830
)
Income (loss) from mine operations
50,213

30,783

(4,151
)
—

—

76,845

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exploration, evaluation and reclamation expenses
(769
)
(7,703
)
919

(2,857
)
(3,599
)
(14,009
)
Operating income (loss)
43,399

20,657

(8,457
)
(2,801
)
(22,903
)
29,895

Income (loss) before income tax
26,239

20,204

(9,066
)
(2,751
)
(26,536
)
8,090

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
$
478,187

$
448,891

$
185,298

$
71,830

$
336,932

$
1,521,138

Non-current assets
235,242

321,802

121,890

69,263

39,822

788,019

Total liabilities
(79,210
)
(93,017
)
(62,243
)
(6,330
)
(274,362
)
(515,162
)

(1) 
Other reconciling items refer to items that are not reported as part of segment performance as they are managed on a corporate basis.

Impairment assessment - Puna Operations
At December 31, 2019, we performed an assessment of our Puna Operations to identify any potential indicators of impairment. We determined that there was an indicator of potential impairment on the $141.9 million carrying value of Puna Operations, which resulted in us assessing the recoverable amount of the CGU. The recoverable amount of Puna Operations CGU was determined to be the FVLCTD, which is based upon the estimated future after-tax cash flows of the CGU. The cash flows were determined based on cash flow projections over the projection period of 2020 to 2026, which incorporate our estimates of metal prices, production based on current estimates of recoverable Mineral Reserves and future operating costs and capital expenditures. We used a long-term silver price of $17.81 per ounce in the cash flow projections, based on market consensus forecasts. Projected cash flows under the FVLCTD model are after-tax and discounted at 9.3% using an estimated weighted average cost of capital of a market participant adjusted for project and country specific risks. We concluded that the FVLCTD exceeded the carrying value of Puna Operations CGU and therefore, no impairment was required. Additionally, we performed a sensitivity analysis over the inputs determined to be most sensitive within the FVLCTD model. The average silver price would have had to decrease by more than approximately 15.0% for Puna Operations to be impaired.


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 50


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


24.
OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)

Revenue by metal
Our Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation produce gold in doré form. Doré is unrefined gold bullion bars usually consisting of in excess of 90% gold that is refined to pure gold bullion prior to sale to our customers, which are typically bullion banks.
Puna Operations produces silver/lead and zinc concentrates, which are sold to smelters or traders for further refining. During 2019, one customer accounted for 42% (2018 - 51%) of our concentrate revenue.
The following table provides a summary of revenue by metal:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Gold
76
%
87
%
Silver
19
%
12
%
Lead
3
%
—
%
Zinc
2
%
1
%
 
100
%
100
%

Non-current assets
The following table provides a summary of non-current assets, excluding financial instruments and deferred income taxes, by location:
At December 31
2019

2018

Canada
$
326,272

$
357,783

United States
285,686

236,054

Argentina
154,986

113,534

Mexico
67,160

66,749

Other
607

575

 
$
834,711

$
774,695




SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 51


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


25.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, marketable securities, other financial assets, trade and other payables, moratorium and our 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes.
a)Financial assets and liabilities by category
At December 31, 2019
Amortized cost

FVTPL

FVTOCI (1)

Total

Financial assets
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents (note 5)
$
503,647

$
—

$
—

$
503,647

Trade receivables (2) (note 6)
—

54,164

—

54,164

Marketable securities (note 7)
—

—

66,453

66,453

Other current and non-current financial assets
13,337

4,627

1,000

18,964

Total financial assets
$
516,984

$
58,791

$
67,453

$
643,228

 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
Trade and other payables
$
78,819

$
19,539

$
—

$
98,358

Other non-current financial liabilities
8,929

—

—

8,929

Debt (note 14(a))
284,049

—

—

284,049

Total financial liabilities
$
371,797

$
19,539

$
—

$
391,336


At December 31, 2018
Amortized cost

FVTPL

FVTOCI (1)

Total

Financial assets
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents (note 5)
$
419,212

$
—

$
—

$
419,212

Trade receivables (2) (note 6)
—

11,287

—

11,287

Marketable securities (note 7)
—

—

29,542

29,542

Other financial assets
25,172

3,711

—

28,883

Total financial assets
$
444,384

$
14,998

$
29,542

$
488,924

 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
Trade and other payables
$
58,695

$
15,885

$
—

$
74,580

Other non-current financial liabilities
14,487

—

—

14,487

Debt (note 14(a))
247,551

—

—

247,551

Total financial liabilities
$
320,733

$
15,885

$
—

$
336,618


(1) 
Investments in equity securities were designated as FVTOCI upon initial recognition as the management of the equity securities in not considered to be part of our core operations. Securities in the portfolio are disposed of when they no longer meet our long-term investment strategy.
(2) 
Trade receivables are classified as FVTPL due to the derivative identified through provisional pricing arrangements discussed in note 2(e).

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 52


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


25.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (continued)

b)Fair value of financial instruments
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value

The categories of the fair value hierarchy that reflect the significance of inputs used in making fair value measurements are as follows:

Level 1 - quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e., as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices); and

Level 3 - inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data.

The levels in the fair value hierarchy into which our financial assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at fair value on a recurring basis were categorized as follows:

 
Fair value at December 31, 2019
 
Level 1 (1)

Level 2 (2)

Level 3 (3)

Total

Trade receivables (note 6)
$
—

$
54,164

$
—

$
54,164

Marketable securities (note 7)
66,453

—

—

66,453

Other financial assets
2,339

2,641

647

5,627

Accrued liabilities
—

(19,539
)
—

(19,539
)
 
$
68,792

$
37,266

$
647

$
106,705


 
Fair value at December 31, 2018
 
Level 1 (1)

Level 2 (2)

Level 3 (3)

Total

Trade receivables (note 6)
$
—

$
11,287

$
—

$
11,287

Marketable securities (note 7)
29,542

—

—

29,542

Other financial assets
2,035

—

1,676

3,711

Accrued liabilities
—

(16,649
)
—

(16,649
)
 
$
31,577

$
(5,362
)
$
1,676

$
27,891


(1) 
Marketable securities of publicly quoted companies, consisting of FVTOCI investments are valued using a market approach based upon unadjusted quoted prices in an active market obtained from securities exchanges.
(2) 
Trade receivables relating to sales of concentrate are included in Level 2 as the basis of valuation uses quoted commodity forward prices. Accrued liabilities relating to DSUs, RSUs, and PSUs and derivative assets and liabilities are included in Level 2 as the basis of valuation uses quoted prices in active markets.
(3) 
Certain items of deferred consideration from the sale of exploration and evaluation assets are included in Level 3, as certain assumptions used in the calculation of the fair value are not based on observable market data as detailed in note 2(m).

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, no amounts were transferred between Levels.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 53


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


25.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (continued)

b)Fair value of financial instruments (continued)
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities not already measured at fair value

The fair value of our 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes as compared to the carrying amounts were as follows:
 
 
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
 
Level
Carrying amount

Fair value

Carrying amount

Fair value

2013 Notes (1)
1
$
(114,280
)
$
(116,581
)
$
(247,551
)
$
(263,675
)
2019 Notes (1)
1
(169,769
)
(297,735
)
—

—

Total convertible notes
 
$
(284,049
)
$
(414,316
)
$
(247,551
)
$
(263,675
)

(1) 
The fair value disclosed for our 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes is included in Level 1 as the basis of valuation uses a quoted price in an active market. The fair value of the convertible notes represents both the debt and equity components of the convertible notes (note 14).
 
26.
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

We are exposed to a variety of financial risks as a result of our operations, including market risk (which includes price risk, currency risk and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. Our overall risk management strategy seeks to reduce potential adverse effects on our financial performance. Risk management is carried out under policies approved by our Board of Directors.
We may, from time to time, use foreign exchange contracts, commodity price contracts, equity hedges and interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency, metal and energy prices, marketable securities values and interest rates. We do not have a practice of trading derivatives. Our use of derivatives is limited to specific programs to manage fluctuations in foreign exchange, diesel prices and marketable securities risks, which are subject to the oversight of our Board of Directors.
The risks associated with our financial instruments, and the policies on how we mitigate those risks are set out below. This is not intended to be a comprehensive discussion of all risks.
a)Market Risk
This is the risk that the fair values of financial instruments will fluctuate owing to changes in market prices. The significant market risks to which we are exposed are price risk, currency risk and interest rate risk.
(i)  Price Risk
This is the risk that the fair values or future cash flows of our financial instruments will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Income from mine operations in the next year depends on the metal prices for gold and silver, lead and zinc and also prices of input commodities such as diesel. These prices are affected by numerous factors that are outside of our control, such as:
▪global or regional consumption patterns;
▪the supply of, and demand for, these commodities;
▪speculative activities;
▪the availability and costs of substitutes;
▪inflation; and
▪political and economic conditions, including interest rates and currency values.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 54


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


26.
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

a)Market Risk (continued)
(i)  Price Risk (continued)
The principal financial instruments that we hold which are impacted by commodity prices are our concentrate trade receivables. The majority of our sales agreements are subject to pricing terms that settle within one to four months after delivery of concentrate, and this adjustment period represents our trade receivable exposure to variations in commodity prices.
We have not hedged the price of any metal as part of our overall corporate strategy.
We hedge a portion of our diesel consumption with the objective of securing future costs. We executed swap and option contracts under a risk management policy approved by our Board of Directors. In addition, due to the ice road supply at the Seabee Gold Operation, we purchase annual consumable supplies in advance at prices which are generally fixed at time of purchase, not during period of use.
A 10% increase or decrease in the silver prices as at December 31, 2019, with all other variables held constant, would have resulted in a $2,260,000 (December 31, 2018 - $891,000) increase or decrease to our trade receivables and after-tax net income.

As we do not have trade receivables for gold sales, movements in gold prices do not impact the value of any financial instruments.

The costs relating to our production activities vary depending on market prices on consumables including diesel fuel and electricity.
During 2019, in accordance with our risk management policy, we have used swaps and options to manage a portion of our cost of diesel. As at December 31, 2019, the fair value of derivative instruments related to our diesel hedges was ($348,000) (December 31, 2018 - ($1,908,000)).
Marigold Mine
Our instruments are based on the Ultra Low Sulphur Gulf Coast Diesel Index for diesel consumed at the Marigold mine. As at December 31, 2019, we have hedged the following future anticipated usage at the Marigold mine:

2020

2021

Gallons hedged (in thousands)
4,200

600

Portion of forecast diesel hedged
41.2
%
5.9
%
Floor price ($/gallon)
1.72

1.50

Cap price ($/gallon)
2.22

2.19

As at December 31, 2019, the spot price of diesel was $1.95 per gallon. If and when it is determined to be favourable, we may execute additional diesel fuel hedges under our risk management policy.
Seabee Gold Operation
As at December 31, 2019, we have not hedged future anticipated diesel usage at the Seabee Gold Operation. If and when it is determined to be favourable, we may execute additional diesel fuel hedges under our risk management policy.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 55


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


25.
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

a)Market Risk (continued)
(i)  Price Risk (continued)
Marketable Securities
We hold certain investments in marketable securities which are measured at fair value, being the closing share price of each equity investment at the balance sheet date. We are exposed to changes in share prices which would result in gains and losses being recognized in OCI. A 10% change in prices would have a $5,748,000 impact on total comprehensive income at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 - $2,555,000). We did not hedge any securities in 2019 or 2018.

(ii)  Currency Risk

Currency risk is the risk that the fair values or future cash flows of our financial instruments and other assets and liabilities will fluctuate because of changes in foreign currency rates. Our financial instruments are exposed to currency risk where those instruments are denominated in currencies that are not the same as the functional currency of the entity that holds them; foreign exchange gains and losses in these situations impact earnings.
The following are the most significant areas of exposure to currency risk, shown in thousands of U.S. dollars:
 
December 31, 2019
 
Canadian dollar

Argentine peso

Cash
$
4,786

$
146

Value added tax receivable
148

19,023

Other financial assets
—

1,250

Trade and other payables (excluding income taxes)
(26,695
)
(13,411
)
Reclamation and closure cost provision
(6,239
)
—

Moratorium
—

(9,120
)
Total
$
(28,000
)
$
(2,112
)

 
December 31, 2018
 
Canadian dollar

Argentine peso

Cash
$
7,982

$
1,604

Value added tax receivable
145

17,039

Other financial assets
—

1,098

Trade and other payables (excluding income taxes)
(22,974
)
(9,908
)
Reclamation and closure cost provision
(5,752
)
—

Moratorium
—

(19,057
)
Total
$
(20,599
)
$
(9,224
)

We monitor and manage this risk with the objective of ensuring our company-wide exposure to negative fluctuations in currencies against the U.S. dollar is managed.
 

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 56


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


26.
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

a)Market Risk (continued)
(ii)  Currency Risk (continued)

Over the course of 2019, the Argentine peso continued to devalue by approximately 59% compared to 102% in 2018. We have a net Argentine peso liability position which has resulted in foreign exchange gains as a result of the devaluation of the Argentine peso.

The Canadian dollar was relatively stable through most of 2019, ending the year having appreciated by 5.0% (2018 - depreciated by 8.7%) and closing at $1.30 Canadian dollar per one U.S. dollar. We have a net Canadian dollar liability position which has resulted in foreign exchange losses as a result of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar.

Our Seabee Gold Operation has exposure to Canadian dollar operating and capital costs. Under our risk management policy, we have entered into options to manage this exposure. As at December 31, 2019, we had the following hedge positions outstanding:

2020

2021

Notional amount (in thousands of Canadian dollars)
54,000

—

Portion of forecast exposure hedged
39.1
%
—
%
Floor level (Canadian dollars per $1 U.S. dollar)
1.2757

—

Cap level (Canadian dollars per $1 U.S. dollar)
1.3683

—


As at December 31, 2019, the fair value of derivative instruments related to our foreign currency hedges was $350,000 (December 31, 2018 ($890,000)).

We assessed the impact of a 10% change in the U.S. dollar exchange rate relative to the Canadian dollar and a 25% change in the U.S. dollar exchange rate relative to the Argentina peso as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 on financial assets and liabilities, with all other variables held constant.

The respective changes in each currency would have resulted in the following impact to our total comprehensive income:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Canadian dollar
$
2,044

$
1,504

Argentine peso
370

1,614

(iii)  Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair values or future cash flows of our financial instruments will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from the interest rate impact on our cash and cash equivalents and our moratorium liability because these are the only financial instruments we hold that are impacted by interest based on variable market interest rates. The 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes have a fixed interest rate and are not exposed to fluctuations in interest rates. A change in interest rates would impact the fair value of the 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes, but because we record the 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes at amortized cost, there would be no impact on our financial results. We monitor our exposure to interest rates closely and have not entered into any derivative contracts to manage our risk.

As at December 31, 2019, the weighted average interest rate earned on our cash and cash equivalents was 1.8% (December 31, 2018 - 2.4%). With other variables unchanged, a 1.0% change in the annualized interest rate would impact after-tax net income by $3,274,000 (December 31, 2018 - $3,372,000).

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 57


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


26.
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)
b)Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to discharge its obligations under the terms of a financial contract. Our credit risk is limited to the following instruments:

(i) Credit risk related to financial institutions and cash deposits

Under our investment policy, investments are made only in highly-rated financial institutions and corporate and government securities. We diversify our holdings and consider the risk of loss associated with investments to be low.

(ii) Credit risk related to trade receivables

We are exposed to credit risk through our trade receivables on concentrate sales, which are principally with internationally-recognized counterparties. Payments of receivables are scheduled, routine and received within a contractually agreed time frame. We manage this risk through provisional payments of at least 75% of the value of the concentrate shipped, through transacting with multiple counterparties and retaining title to the concentrate for the majority of our sales until we receive the first provisional payment.

(iii) Credit risk related to other financial assets

Our credit risk with respect to other financial assets includes deferred consideration following the sales of various mineral properties. We have security related to these payments in the event of default.

We also have credit risk through our significant value-added tax ("VAT") receivables and other receivables balance that is collectible from the government of Argentina. The balance is expected to be recoverable in full, however due to legislative rules and the complex collection process, a significant portion of the asset is classified as non-current until government approval of the recovery claim is approved.

Our maximum exposure to credit risk as at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was as follows:
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Cash and cash equivalents
$
503,647

$
419,212

Value added tax receivable
21,416

18,802

Trade receivables and other assets
54,164

11,287

Other financial assets
17,964

28,883

 
$
597,191

$
478,184


At December 31, 2019, no amounts were held as collateral except those discussed above related to other financial assets.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 58


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


26.
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)
c)Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our obligations associated with financial liabilities as they fall due. We manage our liquidity risk through a rigorous planning, budgeting and forecasting process, which is reviewed and updated on a regular basis, to help determine the funding requirements to support our current operations, expansion and development plans, and by managing our capital structure as described in note 26(d). Our objective is to ensure that there are sufficient committed financial resources to meet our business requirements for a minimum of twelve months.
To supplement corporate liquidity, we have a credit facility (note 14(b)) of which we utilized $580,000 (December 31, 2018 - $8,000,000) to secure certain obligations arising under workers' compensation insurance.
In addition, we use surety bonds to support certain environmental bonding obligations. As at December 31, 2019, we had surety bonds totaling $84,431,000 outstanding (December 31, 2018 - $54,053,000).
We enter into contracts that give rise to commitments in the normal course of business for future minimum payments. The following table summarizes the remaining contractual maturities of our financial liabilities, operating and capital commitments, shown in contractual undiscounted cash flows:
 
Payments due by period (as at December 31, 2019)

Less than one year

1 - 3 years

4-5 years

After 5 years

Total

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
92,018

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
92,018

Moratorium liability
3,537

5,583

—

—

9,120

Convertible notes (principal portion) (note 14)
115,000

—

—

230,000

345,000

Interest payments on convertible notes (note 14)
7,403

11,500

11,500

8,625

39,028

Reclamation and closure costs
9,556

5,694

—

115,438

130,688

Operating expenditure commitments
6,539

1,137

980

2,440

11,096

Capital expenditure commitments
13,311

—

—

—

13,311

Total contractual obligations
$
247,364

$
23,914

$
12,480

$
356,503

$
640,261


We believe working capital at December 31, 2019, together with future cash flows from operations, are sufficient to support our commitments through 2020.

SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 59


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


26.
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

d)Capital management
Our objectives when managing capital are:
▪
to safeguard our ability to continue as a going concern in order to develop and operate our current projects and pursue strategic growth initiatives; and
▪
to maintain a flexible capital structure and minimize the cost of capital.
In assessing our capital structure, we include in our assessment the components of shareholders’ equity and our 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes. In order to facilitate the management of capital requirements, we prepare annual budgets and periodic forecasts and continuously monitor and review actual and forecasted cash flows. The annual budgets are monitored and approved by the Board of Directors.
To maintain or adjust the capital structure, we may, from time to time, issue new shares, issue new debt, repay debt or dispose of non-core assets. We expect our current capital resources will be sufficient to carry out our exploration plans and support operations through the current operating period.
As of December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with our externally-imposed financial covenants in relation to the credit facility (note 14(b)). We do not have any financial covenants in relation to our 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes (note 14).

27.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Key management includes our directors (executive and non-executive) and other key officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The compensation paid or payable to key management for employee services is shown below:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Salaries and other short-term employee benefits
$
3,401

$
2,589

Post-employment benefits
134

83

Termination benefits
—

1,379

Share-based compensation (1)
12,370

10,819

Total compensation
$
15,905

$
14,870


(1) 
Share-based compensation includes fair value adjustments on cumulative DSU and PSU positions as reported in the consolidated statements of income (loss).

28.
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Changes in working capital items during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Trade and other receivables
$
(66,344
)
$
(4,234
)
Inventories
(10,872
)
(40,144
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
19,663

18,753

Provisions - current
(3,493
)
(5,309
)
 
$
(61,046
)
$
(30,934
)


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 60


SSR Mining Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise stated)


28.
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION (continued)

Adjustments for non-cash other operating activities during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Share-based payments
$
4,005

$
2,157

Gain on sale of mineral properties, plant and equipment
(10
)
—

Change in reclamation and closure cost provision
—

1,580

Write-down/loss on mineral properties, plant and equipment
1,018

2,771

Other
6,528

375

 
$
11,541

$
6,883

Non-cash investing and financing transactions during December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Reclamation and closure cost provision assumed in land acquisition
$
(12,990
)
$
—

Transfer of equity-settled PSUs
1,356

—

Marketable securities received as consideration for sale of exploration and evaluation assets (note 7)
—

1,751

Extinguishment of loan receivable in connection with the acquisition of non-controlling interest (note 4)
11,369

—

Non-cash consideration for acquisition of non-controlling interest (note 4)
(30,101
)
—

Transfer of share-based payment reserve upon exercise of stock options
(2,804
)
(2,864
)
 
$
(33,170
)
$
(1,113
)


SSR Mining Inc.
Financial Statements Year-End 2019 | 61





ssrmininglogonewa15.jpg








MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  1





 
CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  2




Management's Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Position and Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2019

This Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") is intended to supplement the audited consolidated financial statements of SSR Mining Inc., ("SSR Mining", "the Company", "we", "us" or "our") for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. All figures are expressed in U.S. dollars except where otherwise indicated. This MD&A has been prepared as of February 20, 2020, and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Additional information, including our most recent Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, and on the EDGAR section of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") website at www.sec.gov.

This MD&A contains "forward-looking statements" that are subject to risk factors set out in a cautionary note contained in Section 13. We use certain non-GAAP financial measures in this MD&A which are described in Section 10. We use Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources classifications in this MD&A, which differ significantly from the classifications required by the SEC, as set out in the cautionary note contained in Section 13.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  3





1.FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL YEAR 2019 HIGHLIGHTS

▪
Achieved annual production and cost guidance: Achieved guidance for the eighth consecutive year by delivering gold equivalent production of 421,828 ounces at cash costs of $740 per payable gold equivalent ounce sold.(1) 

▪
Continued our track record of Mineral Reserves and Resources growth: Successful exploration activities in 2019 increased gold Mineral Reserves at the Marigold mine to 3.9 million ounces. At the Seabee Gold Operation, gold Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) increased to 1.1 million ounces and gold Inferred Mineral Resources increased to 583,000 ounces.

▪
Fourth consecutive year of positive earnings per share: Annual basic attributable income per share in 2019 was $0.47, an increase of 840% from 2018. Annual adjusted basic attributable income per share in 2019 was $0.81, a 252% increase from 2018.(1) 

▪
Delivered record annual gold production at Seabee: The operation achieved its sixth consecutive annual production record, producing 112,137 ounces of gold, exceeding the top end of our annual guidance. Annual cash costs were $464 per payable ounce of gold sold.(1)

▪
Strong operating performance at Marigold: Delivered gold production of 59,186 ounces for the fourth quarter of 2019, resulting in annual production of 220,227 ounces of gold, marking an annual production record and exceeding the top end of our annual guidance. Reported annual cash costs of $811 per payable ounce of gold sold. (1) 

▪
Successful ramp-up of Puna: Produced 7.7 million ounces of silver in 2019 at annual cash costs of $10.38 per payable ounce of silver sold.(1) Strong fourth quarter results with production of 2.1 million ounces of silver and cash costs of $8.90 per payable ounce of silver sold(1), demonstrating operational improvements made through the year.

▪
Acquired 8,900 hectares contiguous to the Marigold mine: Prospective land package on trend with several zones of gold mineralization.

▪
Consolidated 100% ownership in Puna Operations: Completed acquisition of the remaining 25% interest in Puna Operations leading to an immediate increase in silver production and improved operational flexibility.

▪
Maintained strong liquidity and balance sheet: Cash balance increased to $504 million and the value of marketable securities increased to $66 million.

▪
Completed $230 million convertible notes offering: Issued $230 million aggregate principal amount of 2.50% unsecured convertible senior notes on March 19, 2019. A portion of the proceeds was used to repurchase $150 million of our outstanding $265 million 2.875% convertible notes.

▪
Published inaugural Sustainability Report: Report outlines our approach to sustainability and underscores our commitment to transparency with our stakeholders.
(1)
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of cash costs per payable ounce of gold and silver sold and adjusted basic attributable income per share to manage and evaluate operating performance at the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Section 10.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  4




2.OUTLOOK

This section of the MD&A provides management's production, cost, capital, exploration and development expenditure estimates for 2020. These are “forward-looking statements” and subject to the cautionary note regarding the risks associated with forward-looking statements contained in Section 13. Cash costs per payable ounce of gold and silver sold are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.
For the full year 2020, we expect:
Operating Guidance
 
Marigold mine

Seabee Gold Operation

Puna Operations

Gold Production
oz
225,000 - 240,000

110,000 - 120,000

—

Silver Production
Moz
—

—

6.0 - 7.0

Lead Production
Mlb
—

—

21.0 - 24.0

Zinc Production
Mlb
—

—

7.0 - 9.0

Cash Costs per Payable Ounce Sold (1)
$/oz
780 - 810

460 - 500

10.50 - 12.00

Capital Expenditures
 
 
 
 
   Sustaining
$M
60

15

15

   Growth
$M
—

5

6

Capitalized Stripping / Capitalized Development
$M
20

12

12

Exploration Expenditures
 






   Sustaining
$M
4

1

—

   Growth
$M
8

11

1


(1) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measure of cash costs per payable ounce of gold and silver sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at our operations. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Section 10.

In 2020, we expect to produce on a consolidated basis, at the midpoint of guidance, approximately 425,000 gold equivalent ounces at gold equivalent cash costs of $740 per payable ounce sold.

At the Marigold mine, gold production is expected to increase in 2020 compared to 2019. Marigold is well-positioned for another record production year as the mine benefits from an additional hydraulic loading unit purchased in 2019, expected to be commissioned in the first quarter of 2020, and continued operational efficiencies. Production is weighted toward the second half of the year as a result of mine sequencing and access to higher grade ore. Capital investments are expected to total $60 million, including $12 million for two replacement haul trucks and $15 million for an additional leach pad to be built in 2020. The continuous build of leach pad capacity will ensure the operation can maintain leach cycle times and gold recoveries at higher ore stacking rates. Capitalized stripping is expected to total $20 million with the majority incurred through the first three quarters of the year. Exploration expenditures totaling $12 million are expected to focus on drill programs at Mackay, Basalt, Valmy and Trenton Canyon with the goals of adding Mineral Reserves and defining additional Mineral Resources within these areas. Exploration expenditures include $2 million for drill testing Trenton Canyon’s sulphide targets.

At the Seabee Gold Operation, we expect to deliver another record gold production year in 2020 as we continue executing our plan of increasing mining rates to support higher sustained mill throughput. Production is weighted to the first half of the year due to access to higher grade ore. Cash costs are expected to remain low between $460 and $500 per payable ounce of gold sold. Sustaining capital investments remain focused on mining equipment and ventilation, with $5 million planned for underground and surface equipment to enable higher mine production. Due to continued exploration success at Seabee, in 2019 we commenced an expansion of tailings storage capacity at the mine. In 2020, investment in the tailings facility expansion is estimated to total $12 million as phase 1 of the project is completed and phase 2 is initiated, with completion expected in 2021. Once completed, Seabee is expected to have tailings capacity for current mill throughput levels into the early 2030s. Non-tailings facility-related capital expenditures are concentrated in the first quarter of 2020 as equipment is delivered over the ice road. Expected capitalized development expenditures of $12 million support higher mining rates and reflect the development strategy for the Santoy complex. Exploration expenditures at Seabee are estimated to total $12 million with a focus on expansion and definition of Santoy Gap Hanging Wall ("Gap HW") and surface drill programs at the Seabee and Fisher properties following up on targets identified in 2019.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  5





At Puna Operations, we expect to produce between 6.0 and 7.0 million ounces of silver at cash costs, net of by-products, of between $10.50 and $12.00 per payable silver ounce sold. Production is weighted to the first half of the year due to higher grades, with the majority of capital stripping expected in the second half of the year. Sustaining capital investments of $15 million relate principally to maintenance of mine, mill and power generating equipment. A $6 million investment to replace contracted ore transportation is also planned as the operation focuses on lowering unit operating costs.

At the Pitarrilla project, located in Mexico, we plan to spend $4 million in 2020 as part of a two-year $10 million exploration program related to extending an existing decline to provide drill access to the underground Mineral Resources. An improved geological model from work completed in 2019 indicates strong potential to better define known, high-grade mineralized veining associated with steeply dipping rhyolite dyke contacts. Extending the underground ramp provides access for tighter spaced drilling at better orientations to test the rhyolite dykes and veins for continuity. If infill drilling confirms the continuity of high-grade mineralized structures, there would be potential to enhance the grades of existing Mineral Resources.

At the San Luis project, located in Peru, we expect to commence a detailed mapping program in the area of the existing high-grade gold-silver Mineral Resources in 2020.

Our 2.875% senior convertible notes issued in 2013 (the "2013 Notes"), of which approximately $115 million remain outstanding, provide for investors to put the notes to us at their option (the "Put Option") for repurchase at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, on February 1, 2020.

On January 31, 2020, we announced that as of the expiration of the Put Option, $49,000 aggregate principal amount of the 2013 Notes were validly surrendered for purchase. The remaining outstanding 2013 Notes are callable by us at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, at any time at our election giving due notice, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Indenture governing the 2013 Notes (the "Indenture"). On February 13, 2020, we provided notice of redemption to call the remaining outstanding 2013 Notes. We will redeem all of our outstanding 2013 Notes on March 30, 2020 totaling an aggregate principal amount of $114,947,000 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, unless any of the outstanding 2013 Notes are converted into common shares of the Company in accordance with the terms of the 2013 Notes. Following the redemption of the 2013 Notes, no 2013 Notes will remain outstanding.

Gold equivalent figures for our 2020 operating guidance are based on a gold-to-silver ratio of 86:1. Cash costs and capital expenditures guidance is based on an oil price of $60 per barrel and an exchange rate of 1.30 Canadian dollars to one U.S. dollar. Royalty costs at Marigold were calculated using a gold price of $1,550 per ounce.

3.BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Strategy

We are a Canadian-based resource company focused on the operation, acquisition, exploration and development of precious metal resource properties located in the Americas. We have three producing mines and a portfolio of precious metal dominant projects located throughout the Americas. Our focus is on safe, profitable gold and silver production from our Marigold mine in Nevada, U.S., our Seabee Gold Operation in Saskatchewan, Canada, and our Puna Operations in Jujuy, Argentina.

Corporate summary

SSR Mining has an experienced management team of mine-builders and operators with proven capabilities. We have a strong balance sheet with $503.6 million in cash and cash equivalents as at December 31, 2019. We are committed to delivering safe production through relentless emphasis on Operational Excellence. We are also focused on growing production and Mineral Reserves through the exploration and acquisition of assets for accretive growth, while maintaining financial strength.

On March 19, 2019, we issued $230.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.50% unsecured convertible senior notes (the "2019 Notes") for net proceeds of $222.9 million after payment of commissions and expenses related to the offering. For a full description of the 2019 Notes, see the “Capital Resources” discussion in Section 6.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  6




Of the proceeds from the 2019 Notes, $152.3 million was used to repurchase, in separate privately negotiated transactions, $150 million of our outstanding 2013 Notes.

On June 27, 2019, we acquired approximately 8,900 hectares of land contiguous to the Marigold mine, comprised of a 100% interest in the Trenton Canyon and Buffalo Valley properties (the "Properties") from Newmont Corporation and Fairmile Gold Mining, Inc., net of a 0.5% net smelter returns royalty on the Properties. The aggregate purchase price included $22 million in cash and the assumption of related long-term environmental and reclamation obligations then valued at approximately $13 million. The acquisition of the Properties increases Marigold's land position by 84%, provides a potential opportunity to increase mineralization and adds multiple zones of mineralization as potential exploration targets.

In August 2019, we completed the purchase of common shares of SilverCrest Metals Inc. ("SilverCrest") pursuant to our equity participation right. Upon closing of the transaction, we owned approximately 9.8% of the issued and outstanding common shares of SilverCrest on a non-diluted basis. As at December 31, 2019, we owned approximately 8.4% of the issued and outstanding common shares of SilverCrest on a non-diluted basis.

On September 18, 2019, we closed the acquisition of the remaining 25% interest in Puna Operations Inc. from Golden Arrow Resources Corporation ("Golden Arrow") for aggregate consideration totaling approximately $32.4 million (the "Transaction"). The Transaction allowed us to consolidate ownership in Puna Operations, streamlined our reporting structure and is expected to allow for cost savings and operational flexibility. The Transaction also provides us with near-term low-risk silver production growth. Under the terms of the Transaction, aggregate consideration consisted of $2.3 million in cash, $11.4 million for the cancellation of the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the non-revolving term loan to Golden Arrow, $18.2 million in common shares of SSR Mining, and $0.5 million for the transfer to Golden Arrow of 4,285,714 of their common shares held by us.

Market overview

Metal prices

The market prices of gold and silver are key drivers of our profitability. The price of gold can fluctuate widely and is affected by a number of macroeconomic factors, including global or regional consumption patterns, the supply of, and demand for, these metals, interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, and the political and economic conditions of major gold-producing and gold-consuming countries throughout the world.

goldandsilver.jpg

The price of gold traded between $1,270 per ounce and $1,350 per ounce in the first two quarters of 2019 and then increased steadily until early September, recording its highest level in 2019 at $1,552 per ounce, before declining slightly to finish 2019 at $1,517 per ounce. The PM fix average of $1,393 per ounce in 2019 was higher than the 2018 average of $1,268 per ounce. The silver price trading pattern closely followed that of gold with the first two quarters of 2019 trading within a range between $14.35 and $16.00 per ounce. From July through September, the price of silver increased to its highest level in 2019 of $19.57 per ounce and closed the year at $17.83 per ounce. The 2019 average silver fix price of $16.21 per ounce was higher compared to the 2018 average of $15.71 per ounce.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  7




In the fourth quarter of 2019, the average gold price of $1,481 per ounce increased from the average gold price of $1,472 per ounce in the third quarter of 2019. The average silver price over the same periods was $17.32 per ounce and $16.98 per ounce, respectively. 

During 2019, two overarching themes lent support to the precious metals sector, including the move by various Central Banks to continue with or to project interest rate cuts, resulting in reduced bond yields as well as a general move away from risk and increased appetite for safe-haven assets such as gold. Significant events during the year that supported a movement away from risk included trade negotiations between the United States and China, geopolitical uncertainty surrounding Brexit, the air attack on Saudi Arabia's largest oil facility, unrest amongst the populace in Hong Kong and impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States. In early 2020, the gold price has continued to increase, reaching a multi-year high, impacted largely by the Coronavirus outbreak in China. 

Currency and commodity markets

The Canadian dollar (“CAD”) opened 2019 at $1.36 per one U.S. dollar, its weakest point for the year. The CAD generally strengthened during 2019 and, with the Canadian economy and dollar strongly correlated to commodities, the CAD ended the year at its strongest level for 2019 at $1.30 per one U.S. dollar. The Canadian and U.S dollar pairing spent the year trading at an average of $1.33 per one U.S. dollar, plus or minus 200 basis points, compared to $1.30 per one U.S. dollar in 2018, with the pattern dependent upon oil prices, the state of disruptive agriculture trading with China, trade tensions with the United States, and a divergence in Canadian Central Bank monetary policy relative to the United States Federal Reserve and other major Central Banks. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the CAD averaged $1.32 per one U.S. dollar, consistent with the average foreign exchange rate in the third quarter of 2019. Our Seabee Gold Operation has exposure to Canadian dollar operating and capital costs. Under our risk management policy, we have entered into options to manage this exposure.

foreignexchangecadusd3a05.jpg

The Argentine peso ("ARS") depreciated from ARS 38 per one U.S. dollar at the start of 2019 to ARS 60 per one U.S. dollar in early December and closed the year at ARS 60 per one U.S. dollar. The average foreign exchange rate in 2019 was ARS 48 per one U.S dollar compared to ARS 28 per one U.S. dollar in 2018. The Argentine peso devalued by 53% relative to the U.S. dollar during 2019. In August 2019, the Argentine peso weakened from 45 to 60 per one U.S. dollar over a five-day period after the primary election, whereby the contesting Peronista party emerged as the likely winner of the federal election in November, which was the ultimate outcome. The move to this new government led to concerns regarding sovereign debt repayment, stricter foreign currency controls, a weak economy and high inflation. While a weaker currency is positive for Puna Operations’ operating costs, we expect the high inflation rates in Argentina to generally offset the benefits of the currency devaluation.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  8




arsusd.jpg


Consolidated financial summary
(presented in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for per share value)
 
 
 
 
 
Selected Financial Data (1)
Three Months
Ended December 31
Year
Ended December 31
 
2019

2018

2019

2018

 
$

$

$

$

Revenue
177,603

103,712

606,850

420,675

Income from mine operations (1)
58,913

16,536

170,883

76,845

Gross margin (%) (2)
33

16

28

18

Operating income (1)
43,228

3,061

122,338

29,895

Net income (loss)
19,479

(2,544
)
55,757

(31
)
Net income (loss) attributable to equity holders of SSR Mining
19,479

(3,486
)
57,315

6,379

Basic attributable income (loss) per share
0.16

(0.03
)
0.47

0.05

Adjusted attributable income before tax (1)
48,211

(345
)
129,419

28,586

Adjusted attributable net income (1)
36,625

4,369

98,215

27,961

Adjusted basic attributable income per share (1)
0.30

0.04

0.81

0.23

Cash generated by (used in) operating activities
48,632

(3,744
)
134,198

59,769

Cash used in investing activities
(22,303
)
(63,027
)
(130,328
)
(115,930
)
Cash generated by financing activities
(251
)
11,903

80,553

20,516

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Position
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Cash and cash equivalents
503,647
 
419,212
 
Marketable securities
66,453
 
29,542
 
Current assets
899,662
 
733,119
 
Current liabilities
234,171
 
83,254
 
Working capital (3)
665,491
 
649,865
 
Total assets
1,750,107
 
1,521,138
 

(1) 
We report non-GAAP financial measures including adjusted attributable income before tax, adjusted attributable net income, and adjusted basic attributable income per share to manage and evaluate our operating performance. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.
(2) 
Gross margin is defined as income from mine operations divided by revenue.
(3) 
Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  9




Annual financial summary

Realized gold and silver prices are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

Revenue for the year ended 2019 increased by 44% compared to the year ended 2018 mainly due to a 14% increase in gold ounces sold and a 10% increase in realized gold price at our Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, as well as a 105% increase in silver ounces sold and a 2% increase in realized silver price at our Puna Operations.

Income from mine operations for the year ended 2019 of $170.9 million generated a gross margin of 28% compared to a gross margin of 18% for the year ended 2018, primarily due to higher ounces of gold and silver sold and higher average realized prices of gold and silver. Net income for the year ended 2019 was $55.8 million, compared to net loss of $0.0 million for the comparative period 2018.

Cash generated by operating activities for the year ended 2019 increased to $134.2 million compared to $59.8 million for the year ended 2018. The increase is mainly due to higher ounces sold and higher average realized prices of gold and silver.

Investing activities used $130.3 million for the year ended 2019 compared to using $115.9 million for the year ended 2018. In 2019, we invested $55.9 million in plant and equipment, $22.6 million to acquire the Properties, $23.2 million in capitalized stripping costs, $13.4 million in underground development costs and $11.6 million in the Chinchillas project. We also received $9.7 million of interest. In 2018, we invested $67.7 million in plant and equipment, $60.2 million on the Chinchillas project and $23.1 million in marketable securities, which was partially offset by $63.4 million received from the sale of marketable securities.

Cash generated by financing activities for the year ended 2019 increased to $80.6 million compared to $20.5 million for the year ended 2018. In 2019, we repurchased a portion of our 2013 Notes for $152.3 million and issued the 2019 Notes for net proceeds of $222.9 million. In addition, we received proceeds from stock option exercises of $7.2 million and funding, prior to the acquisition of the non-controlling interest, from our joint venture partner at Puna Operations of $3.7 million. In 2018, we received funding from our joint venture partner for $15.2 million at Puna Operations, as well as proceeds on the exercise of stock options of $5.3 million.

Quarterly financial summary

Realized gold and silver prices are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

Revenue increased by 71% in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the fourth quarter of 2018, mainly due to an 18% increase in gold ounces sold and a 20% increase in realized gold price at our Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, as well as a 177% increase in silver ounces sold and a 20% increase in realized silver price at our Puna Operations.

Income from mine operations of $58.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2019 generated a gross margin of 33% compared to a gross margin of 16% in the fourth quarter of 2018. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2018, income from mine operations generated at all of our operations were higher mainly due to higher average realized prices of gold and silver and higher gold and silver ounces sold. Net income for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $19.5 million, compared to a net loss of $2.5 million in the same quarter of 2018.

Cash generated from operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2019 increased to $48.6 million compared to $3.7 million used in operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2018. All mine operations generated higher margins driven primarily by higher realized gold and silver prices.

Investing activities used $22.3 million of cash in the fourth quarter of 2019. This included expenditures of $18.9 million on plant and equipment, capitalized stripping costs of $3.7 million and underground development costs of $3.3 million, offset partially by $2.2 million of interest received. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we invested $10.6 million in mineral properties, plant and equipment, $18.9 million on the Chinchillas project and $23.1 million on the purchase of marketable securities.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  10




Cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to cash generated of $11.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2018.

4.RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated results of operations

The following table presents consolidated operating information for our Marigold mine, our Seabee Gold Operation and our Puna Operations. Additional operating information is provided in the sections relating to the individual mines.

 Three months ended
Total
Operating data
December 31, 2019

September 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

March 31, 2019

2019

2018

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated production and sales:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold produced (oz)
81,255

85,313

81,461

84,335

332,364

300,763

Silver produced ('000 oz)
2,132

1,664

1,486

2,392

7,674

3,747

Lead produced ('000 lb) (1)
7,985

5,304

3,879

6,789

23,957

3,107

Zinc produced ('000 lb) (2)
3,007

2,206

1,539

1,640

8,392

8,775

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold sold (oz)
85,450

78,928

83,978

83,516

331,872

290,294

Silver sold ('000 oz)
2,584

1,505

2,679

927

7,695

3,761

Lead sold ('000 lb) (1)
9,371

4,119

7,652

2,977

24,119

1,059

Zinc sold ('000 lb) (2)
3,067

2,030

5,757

3,218

14,072

2,365

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash costs ($/oz) - payable gold from Marigold mine (3)
778

822

835

812

811

723

Cash costs ($/oz) - payable gold from Seabee Gold Operation (3)
505

373

526

467

464

505

Cash costs ($/oz) - payable silver from Puna Operations (3)
8.90

14.22

9.80

9.94

10.38

15.91

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold equivalent production (oz) (4)
106,205

104,775

98,334

112,514

421,828

347,090

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gold price ($/oz) (3)
1,480

1,480

1,314

1,303

1,394

1,263

Realized silver price ($/oz) (3)
17.32

17.31

14.92

15.35

16.26

15.92

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash costs per equivalent gold ounce sold ($/oz) (3,4)
716

759

775

712

740

736

AISC per equivalent gold ounce sold ($/oz) (3,4)
1,088

1,136

1,049

1,088

1,087

1,088

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Financial data ($000s)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
177,603

147,848

155,149

126,250

606,850

420,675

Income from mine operations
58,913

51,906

29,827

30,237

170,883

76,845


(1) 
Data for lead production and sales relate only to lead in lead concentrate.
(2) 
Data for zinc production and sales relate only to zinc in zinc concentrate.
(3) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of realized metal prices, cash costs and all-in sustaining costs ("AISC") per payable ounce of precious metals sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at our mines. For further information, please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Section 10.
(4) 
Gold equivalent ounces have been established using the realized metal prices per payable ounce of precious metals sold in the period and applied to the recovered silver metal content produced by the mines. Zinc and lead production are not included in gold equivalent ounces produced.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  11




Marigold Mine, U.S.
 
 Three months ended
Total
Operating data
December 31, 2019

September 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

March 31, 2019

2019

2018

Total material mined (kt)
18,457

19,033

19,254

17,295

74,039

70,431

Waste removed (kt)
11,736

12,676

12,185

11,767

48,364

42,907

Total ore stacked (kt)
6,721

6,357

7,070

5,528

25,676

27,526

Gold stacked grade (g/t)
0.36

0.51

0.38

0.34

0.40

0.37

Gold recovery (%)
76.0

77.0

75.0

73.0

75.4

73.5

Strip ratio
1.7

2.0

1.7

2.1

1.9

1.6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mining cost ($/t mined)
1.83

1.73

1.65

1.73

1.74

1.76

Processing cost ($/t processed)
1.03

1.17

1.01

1.20

1.10

1.03

General and administrative costs ($/t processed)
0.54

0.54

0.47

0.54

0.51

0.45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold produced (oz)
59,186

52,968

54,922

53,151

220,227

205,161

Gold sold (oz)
61,088

50,650

59,702

55,517

226,957

198,884

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gold price ($/oz) (1)
1,478

1,481

1,309

1,303

1,391

1,261

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash costs ($/oz) (1)
778

822

835

812

811

723

AISC ($/oz) (1)
1,117

1,104

986

930

1,034

974

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial data ($000s)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
90,198

74,820

78,039

72,263

315,320

250,341

Income from mine operations
30,263

22,064

13,939

12,981

79,247

50,213

Capital expenditures (2)
17,768

10,496

6,924

3,167

38,355

52,935

Capitalized stripping
2,116

2,031

871

2,293

7,311

7,489

Exploration expenditures (3)
1,190

1,990

2,452

3,653

9,285

10,209


(1) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of realized gold price, cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at the Marigold mine. For further information, please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Section 10.
(2) 
Excludes capitalized exploration expenditures.
(3) 
Includes capitalized and expensed exploration expenditures.

Mine production

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Marigold mine produced 220,227 ounces of gold, an increase of 7% compared to the 205,161 ounces of gold produced for the year ended 2018. For the year ended 2019, gold sales were 226,957 ounces as 2019 began with 6,300 ounces in finished goods inventory.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, total material mined was 74.0 million tonnes, a 5% increase as compared to the year ended 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we mined 25.7 million ore tonnes, a 7% decrease from the previous year, offset by an 8% increase in gold stacked grade.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, 18.5 million tonnes of material were mined, a decrease of 3% compared to the third quarter of 2019, due to a long shovel move and variance to planned haulage cycles. A new leach pad cell was commissioned on schedule with material stacking commencing in the fourth quarter.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we delivered approximately 6.7 million tonnes of ore to the heap leach pads at a gold grade of 0.36 g/t. This compares to 6.4 million tonnes of ore delivered to the heap leach pads at a gold grade of 0.51 g/t in the third quarter of 2019. Gold grade mined in the fourth quarter of 2019 was 29% lower than the prior quarter as primary ore deliveries from Mackay Phase 5 wound down and were replaced by lower grade material from Mackay Phase 4. The strip ratio declined to 1.7:1 in the fourth quarter of 2019, a decrease of 12% compared to the prior quarter.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  12




During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Marigold mine produced 59,186 ounces of gold, a 12% increase compared to the prior quarter. The increase was due to higher-grade ore stacked during the third quarter of 2019, becoming available for production in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Mine operating costs

Cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold sold are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of gold sold were $811, an increase of 12% compared to the year ended 2018, primarily due to higher leach pad opening inventory unit costs. Total mining costs of $1.74 per tonne for the year ended December 31, 2019 were consistent with the prior year primarily due to 5% higher tonnes mined, offset partially by 4% higher total mining costs. Processing and general and administrative unit costs were higher for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year mainly due to 7% fewer ore tonnes mined. Total processing costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 were consistent with total processing costs for the year ended 2018, while general and administrative costs increased 7% primarily due to higher labor costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, AISC per payable ounce of gold sold was $1,034 compared to $974 for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the higher cash costs referred to above, offset partially by an increase in the number of ounces sold.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of gold sold were $778, a decrease of 5% compared to the previous quarter primarily due to lower leach pad opening inventory unit costs in the fourth quarter resulting from higher grades mined in the third quarter. Total mining costs of $1.83 per tonne in the fourth quarter of 2019 were 6% higher than the previous quarter due to 3% fewer tonnes mined and 3% higher total mining costs. Total mining costs were higher in the fourth quarter of 2019 mainly due to the timing of haul truck tire replacements. Processing unit costs were 12% lower in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the previous quarter mainly due to 6% higher ore tonnes mined and 7% lower total processing costs. Total processing costs were lower in the fourth quarter of 2019 mainly due to lower cyanide consumption and lower power unit rates. General and administrative unit costs in the fourth quarter of 2019 were consistent with the previous quarter as higher ore tonnes mined were offset by higher labor costs.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, AISC per payable ounce of gold sold was $1,117 compared to $1,104 in the third quarter of 2019 due to higher planned sustaining capital expenditures, primarily related to the purchase of a PC7000 Komatsu shovel during the quarter for approximately $10.6 million.

Mine sales

Realized gold price is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 226,957 ounces of gold, a 14% increase compared to sales of 198,884 ounces of gold during the prior year. We realized an average gold price of $1,391 per ounce during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to an average realized gold price of $1,261 per ounce during the year ended December 31, 2018.
 
In the fourth quarter of 2019, we sold 61,088 ounces of gold, a 21% increase compared to sales of 50,650 ounces of gold in the third quarter of 2019. We realized an average gold price of $1,478 per ounce during the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to an average realized gold price of $1,481 per ounce during the third quarter of 2019.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  13




Exploration

The main focus of the 2019 exploration program at Marigold was to convert Red Dot Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves. During previous quarters, we conducted exploration drilling for additional Mineral Resources along areas that were north and south of Red Dot, within the Mackay pit and on Valmy target areas such as Crossfire and East Basalt. During the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed a total of 64 reverse circulation ("RC") drill holes for 20,682 meters on these targets.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, our Red Dot exploration program focused on geotechnical drilling and engineering with the goal of declaring additional Mineral Reserves. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed the second phase of confirmation drilling, which included nine core holes for 3,700 meters. Based on the results of these evaluations, we converted Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves and Red Dot is anticipated to extend the Marigold mine life into the early 2030s, without requiring expansion of the haul fleet or the associated expansion capital.

Exploration at Marigold for the year ended December 31, 2019 was successful in replacing mined depletion and growing Mineral Reserves compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Including leach pad inventory, year-over-year Probable Mineral Reserves increased by 18%. At the same time, Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves and leach pad inventory) decreased by 11% due to depletion and model changes. Inferred Mineral Resources declined by 55% to 0.18 million gold ounces (16.2 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.35 g/t). Please see Section 5 for additional information regarding our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed 20,825 meters of drilling in 64 RC drill holes at Trenton Canyon. RC drilling for the year amounted to 93,006 meters in 272 drill holes.

Following the exploration release of July 30, 2019, we received another 42 intercepts with grade-thickness products exceeding 20 gram-meters. These results, in addition to earlier published drill assays, contribute to the Mineral Resources reported for the Marigold mine.

For 2020, we are planning 64,000 meters of RC and core drilling for resource growth at Trenton Canyon, Valmy, East Basalt, Mackay, and on two recently acquired small land parcels internal to Marigold's mineral claims package. This work includes diamond drilling to explore for higher-grade sulphide hosted gold deposits between East Basalt and Trenton Canyon.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  14




Seabee Gold Operation, Canada
 
 Three months ended
Total
Operating data
December 31, 2019

September 30, 2019

June 30,
2019

March 31,
2019

2019

2018

Total ore milled (t)
87,394

77,465

88,424

90,756

344,039

351,999

Ore milled per day (t/day)
950

842

971

1,008

943

964

Gold mill feed grade (g/t)
7.89

12.39

9.83

8.59

9.56

9.16

Gold recovery (%)
97.9

98.8

98.4

97.2

98.2

97.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mining cost ($/t mined)
59

61

53

52

56

56

Processing cost ($/t processed)
29

28

35

28

30

25

General and administrative costs
($/t processed)
59

59

50

53

54

56

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold produced (oz)
22,069

32,345

26,539

31,184

112,137

95,602

Gold sold (oz)
24,362

28,278

24,276

27,999

104,915

91,410

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gold price ($/oz) (1)
1,484

1,480

1,329

1,302

1,398

1,267

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash costs ($/oz) (1)
505

373

526

467

464

505

AISC ($/oz) (1)
751

715

828

947

812

755

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial data ($000s)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
36,142

41,331

32,237

36,431

146,141

115,655

Income from mine operations
13,735

22,134

11,762

13,672

61,303

30,783

Capital expenditures
2,772

5,406

3,358

8,772

20,308

7,054

Capitalized development
3,312

3,352

3,345

3,379

13,388

9,074

Exploration expenditures (2)
1,210

2,131

2,257

3,172

8,770

9,298


(1) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of realized gold price, cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at the Seabee Gold Operation. For further information, please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Section 10.
(2) 
Includes capitalized and expensed exploration expenditures.

Mine production

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Seabee Gold Operation produced 112,137 ounces of gold, an annual production record and a 17% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in gold production was mainly due to higher mill feed head grade, in addition to 1,244 ounces (on a gross basis) recovered from sludge, fines and cathodes during the third quarter of 2019.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the operation milled 344,039 tonnes of ore, a decrease of 2% from the 351,999 tonnes milled during the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the average gold mill feed grade was 9.56 g/t, a 4% increase compared to the prior year. The Santoy mine supplied 100% of ore milled, predominantly from long hole stopes.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, the operation produced 22,069 ounces of gold, a 32% decrease from the third quarter of 2019, mainly due to lower gold grades more than offsetting higher milling rates.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, the operation milled 87,394 tonnes of ore compared to 77,465 tonnes in the third quarter of 2019. The mill achieved an average throughput of 950 tonnes per day over the fourth quarter of 2019, a 13% increase compared to the previous quarter, mainly due to increased mill feed from the Santoy mine. During the fourth quarter of 2019, gold mill feed grade was 7.89 g/t, a 36% decrease compared to the third quarter of 2019, as a result of stope sequencing. Gold recovery for the fourth quarter of 2019 was 97.9%, consistent with the previous quarter.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  15





Mine operating costs

Cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold sold are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of gold sold were $464, 8% lower than the $505 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is due primarily to a 15% increase in ounces sold in 2019 as a result of the higher gold mill feed grade, offset partially by higher processing costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, AISC per payable ounce of gold sold was $812, 8% higher than the $755 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is due to higher planned capital expenditures in 2019, related mainly to the Tailings Management Facility expansion, offset partially by the decrease in cash costs.

For the fourth quarter of 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of gold sold were $505, 35% higher than the $373 for the third quarter of 2019, due primarily to lower gold grade, 14% fewer ounces sold compared to the third quarter of 2019 and increases in total mining and general and administrative costs.

For the fourth quarter of 2019, AISC per payable ounce of gold sold was $751, compared to $715 in the third quarter of 2019 due to higher cash costs in conjunction with lower ounces sold in the fourth quarter of 2019, offset partially by lower sustaining capital expenditures.

Mine sales

Realized gold price is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 104,915 ounces of gold, a 15% increase compared to the 91,410 ounces of gold sold in during the prior year. We realized an average gold price of $1,398 per ounce during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to an average realized gold price of $1,267 per ounce during the year ended December 31, 2018.
 
In the fourth quarter of 2019, we sold 24,362 ounces of gold, a decrease of 14% compared to the 28,278 ounces of gold sold in the third quarter of 2019. We realized an average gold price of $1,484 per ounce during the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to an average realized gold price of $1,480 per ounce during the third quarter of 2019.

Exploration

In 2019, exploration at Seabee focused on increasing and upgrading Mineral Resources near the Santoy mine through 68,000 meters of drilling from surface and underground. Specific targets included Santoy 8A and Santoy Gap and the recently discovered Inferred Mineral Resources at Gap HW.  

For the year ended December 31, 2019, Mineral Reserves decreased by 18%, due to mining depletion; however, the average gold grade is 11% higher compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) increased by 23% at an average gold grade of 10.61 g/t as a result of our exploration focus at Gap HW. As of December 31, 2019, Inferred Mineral Resources are 583,000 ounces (2.13 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 8.50 g/t), 21% higher compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, due to conversion and continued exploration activity at Gap HW. Gap HW is now a significant discovery for the Seabee Gold Operation and remains open on strike and at depth. Please see Section 5 for additional information regarding our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, Seabee Gold Operation completed 12,738 meters of underground drilling for a total of 68,158 meters for the year ended December 31, 2019 to convert and extend portions of Santoy 8A, Santoy Gap and Gap HW deposits. The majority of the drilled meters were targeting Gap HW.

For 2020, we are planning to drill 50,000 meters in the area of the Santoy mine and Gap HW as brownfield work, with another 37,000 meters of drilling on greenfield targets on tenures controlled by us. Additionally, we are planning 12,000 meters of greenfield drilling on the Fisher property.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  16




Puna Operations, Argentina
(amounts presented on a 100% basis unless otherwise stated)

 
 Three months ended
Total
Operating data
December 31, 2019

September 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

March 31, 2019

2019

2018

Total material mined (kt) (1)
3,244

3,116

3,304

2,618

12,282

897

Waste removed (kt) (1)
2,725

2,531

3,114

2,469

10,839

696

Strip ratio (1)
5.3

4.3

16.4

16.6

7.5

3.5

Ore milled (kt)
400

336

313

345

1,394

1,420

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Silver mill feed grade (g/t)
174

165

160

235

184

114

Lead mill feed grade (%)
0.99

0.81

0.71

1.07

0.89

0.92

Zinc mill feed grade (%)
0.63

0.60

0.46

0.46

0.54

0.84

Silver recovery (%)
95.1

93.5

92.4

91.7

93.2

72.1

Lead recovery (%)
91.9

88.1

79.4

83.6

85.8

83.1

Zinc recovery (%)
54.3

49.3

48.1

47.3

49.2

39.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mining cost ($/t mined) (1)
2.62

2.76

2.33

2.74

2.60

2.61

Processing cost ($/t milled)
29.53

36.34

32.57

29.62

32.04

18.72

General and administrative costs ($/t milled)
9.11

9.24

8.27

8.02

8.68

7.34

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Silver produced ('000 oz)
2,132

1,664

1,486

2,392

7,674

3,747

Silver sold ('000 oz)
2,584

1,505

2,679

927

7,695

3,761

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lead produced ('000 lb) (2)
7,985

5,304

3,879

6,789

23,957

3,107

Lead sold ('000 lb) (2)
9,371

4,119

7,652

2,977

24,119

1,059

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Zinc produced ('000 lb) (3)
3,007

2,206

1,539

1,640

8,392

8,775

Zinc sold ('000 lb) (3)
3,067

2,030

5,757

3,218

14,072

2,365

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized silver price ($/oz) (4)
17.32

17.31

14.92

15.35

16.26

15.92

Realized lead price ($/lb) (4)
0.92

0.94

0.85

0.95

0.90

0.89

Realized zinc price ($/lb) (4)
1.11

1.03

1.28

1.27

1.20

1.21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash costs ($/oz) (4)
8.90

14.22

9.80

9.94

10.38

15.91

AISC ($/oz) (4)
11.18

17.36

13.08

19.76

14.06

19.33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Data ($000s)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
51,263

31,697

44,873

17,556

145,389

54,679

Income (loss) from mine operations
14,915

7,708

4,126

3,584

30,333

(4,151
)
Capitalized expenditures (5)
2,134

1,782

1,157

1,543

6,616

9,680

Capitalized stripping
2,565

1,385

6,273

6,191

16,414

—

Exploration expenditures
492

229

65

1

787

462


(1) 
Data for 2018 is for the period subsequent to December 1, 2018, the date upon which commercial production was declared at the Chinchillas mine.
(2) 
Data for lead production and sales relate only to lead in lead concentrate.
(3) 
Data for zinc production and sales relate only to zinc in zinc concentrate.
(4) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of realized silver, lead and zinc prices, cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of silver sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at Puna Operations. For further information, please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Section 10.
(5) 
Does not include exploration or development of the Chinchillas project or capitalized stripping.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  17




Mine production

For the year ended December 31, 2019, Puna Operations produced a total of 7.7 million ounces of silver, 24.0 million pounds of lead and 8.4 million pounds of zinc. After declaring commercial production at the Chinchillas mine in December 2018, 2019 represented the first full year of Puna Operations milling Chinchillas open pit ore. During the year ended December 31, 2019, ore was milled at an average of 3,819 tonnes per day and contained an average silver grade of 184 g/t. The average silver recovery was 93.2%, a 29% improvement as compared to 2018 when the operation milled primarily low-grade stockpiled ore.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, silver production was 2.1 million ounces, an increase of 28% compared to the third quarter of 2019, due mainly to increased mill throughput and processing of higher-grade ore. During the fourth quarter of 2019, ore was milled at an average of 4,349 tonnes per day. Processed ore in the fourth quarter of 2019 contained an average silver grade of 174 g/t, a 5% increase compared to the third quarter of 2019. The average silver recovery in the fourth quarter of 2019 was 95.1% as mill performance continues to benefit from our Operational Excellence initiatives.

Mine operating costs

Cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of silver sold are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of silver sold were $10.38, a decrease of 35% compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is mainly due to increased production as the Chinchillas mine achieved steady state operations, driven by higher silver mill feed grades and recoveries, partially offset by higher unit processing costs, driven by a re-start of the zinc circuit in 2019, the pumping of tailings for in-pit disposal at the Pirquitas plant and higher ore haulage costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, AISC per payable ounce of silver sold was $14.06, a decrease of 27% compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is mainly due to lower cash costs per payable ounce of silver sold, offset partially by higher capital expenditures, including capital stripping costs, of which the majority were incurred in the first half of 2019.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of silver sold were $8.90, a decrease of 37% compared to the third quarter of 2019. The decrease is mainly due to lower per unit operating costs as a result of higher mill throughput and higher by-product credits during the fourth quarter of 2019, driven by higher production resulting from an increase in mill throughput, feed grades, and recoveries.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, AISC per payable ounce of silver sold was $11.18, a decrease of 36% compared to the third quarter of 2019. The decrease is mainly due to lower cash costs per payable ounce of silver sold, offset partially by higher capital expenditures, including capitalized stripping costs during the fourth quarter of 2019.

Mine sales

Realized silver price is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, silver sales totaled 7.7 million ounces, an increase of 105% compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Lead sales totaled 24.1 million pounds and zinc sales totaled 14.1 million pounds. The increase in concentrate sales is mainly due to an increase in production, as 2019 represented the first full year of production at the Chinchillas mine. For the year ended December 31, 2019, realized silver price was $16.26 per ounce, an increase of 2% compared to the previous year.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, silver sales totaled 2.6 million ounces, an increase of 72% compared to the third quarter of 2019. Lead and zinc sales totaled 9.4 million pounds and 3.1 million pounds, respectively, representing increases of 128% and 51%, respectively, compared to the previous quarter. The increase in concentrate sales is mainly due to higher production in the fourth quarter of 2019, driven by higher throughput, feed grades, and recoveries, as well as the timing of concentrate sales.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  18




Exploration

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed 2,074 meters of diamond drilling exploring the Granada target. The Granada target is the projected intersection of the north-dipping past producing historic Potosi vein and the south-dipping Cortaderas Breccia vein which hosts much of the current underground Mineral Resources at Pirquitas. We anticipate completing the drilling in 2020 and reporting these results in the first half of 2020.

Chinchillas Project, Argentina

The Chinchillas project was completed in the fourth quarter of 2019 with all project components handed over to operations. The project was completed for an investment of $75 million, approximately $6 million below approved budget.

5.MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2019, our total estimated gold Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves were 4.4 million ounces including Marigold leach pad inventory (230.3 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.56 g/t excluding Marigold leach pad inventory) and total estimated silver Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves were 49.7 million ounces (10.4 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 149 g/t) compared to 3.9 million ounces including Marigold leach pad inventory (203.6 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.56 g/t excluding Marigold leach pad inventory) and 38.7 million ounces (7.74 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 156 g/t), respectively, at December 31, 2018. Mineral Reserves estimates for the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations have been determined based on prices of $1,250 per ounce of gold and $18.00 per ounce of silver. These prices are unchanged from those used to determine the Mineral Reserves estimate at December 31, 2018. Further details regarding our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates are presented in the "Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources" section of our news release dated February 20, 2020.

At the Marigold mine, our 2019 exploration program led to an increase in Mineral Reserves. Probable Mineral Reserves increased to 3.9 million ounces of gold (228.8 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.49 g/t) at the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of 18% compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. After consideration of mining depletion in 2019 of 330,000 ounces, 912,000 ounces (51.9 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.55 g/t) of Probable Mineral Reserves were added in 2019. The increase in Probable Mineral Reserves is mainly attributable to our successful infill and exploration drilling programs which converted Mineral Resources at Phases 2 and 3 of Red Dot and Mackay. We added 874,000 ounces (53.0 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.51 g/t) of gold Probable Mineral Reserves at Red Dot in Phases 2 and 3. Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) totaled 4.9 million ounces of gold (301.8 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.48 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 5.6 million ounces (354.5 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.47 g/t) at December 31, 2018. The reduction is principally due to depletion and revised slope angles. Inferred Mineral Resources declined to 182,000 ounces of gold (16.2 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.35 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 404,000 ounces of gold (33.6 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.37 g/t) at December 31, 2018, due to conversion in certain areas at Mackay and Red Dot. Both the 3.9 million ounce Probable Mineral Reserve and the 4.9 million ounce Indicated Mineral Resource (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) are inclusive of the respective year's leach pad inventory. For further information regarding our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimate at Marigold, please see the technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Marigold mine, Humboldt County, Nevada, U.S.A" dated July 31, 2018.

At the Seabee Gold Operation, Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves total 500,000 ounces of gold at December 31, 2019, compared to 608,000 ounces at December 31, 2018. Proven Mineral Reserves were 117,000 ounces (0.37 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 9.82 g/t) and Probable Mineral Reserves were 383,000 ounces (1.16 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 10.29 g/t). The decrease in Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves was primarily due to depletion. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) total 1,050,000 gold ounces (3.08 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 10.61 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 856,000 ounces (2.29 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 11.60 g/t) at December 31, 2018. This 23% addition of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources principally reflects conversion and additions at Gap HW. Measured Mineral Resources are 201,000 ounces (0.49 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 12.69 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 170,000 ounces (0.45 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 11.76 g/t) at December 31, 2018 and Indicated Mineral Resources are 849,000 ounces (2.59 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 10.22 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 686,000 ounces (1.85 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 11.56 g/t) at December 31, 2018.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  19




As at December 31, 2019, Inferred Mineral Resources totaled 583,000 gold ounces (2.13 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 8.50 g/t) compared to 483,000 ounces (1.70 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 8.82 g/t) at December 31, 2018, with the majority of the increase resulting from discovery at Gap HW more than offsetting the conversion at Gap HW to Indicated Mineral Resources. The Gap HW discovery now totals 279,000 ounces (1.15 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 7.52 g/t) classified as Indicated Mineral Resources and an additional 217,000 ounces (0.85 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 7.94 g/t) classified as Inferred Mineral Resources. For further information regarding our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimate at the Seabee Gold Operation, please see the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Seabee Gold Operation, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated October 20, 2017.

At Puna Operations, silver Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves are 49.7 million ounces at December 31, 2019 compared to 38.7 million ounces at December 31, 2018. The increase in reported Mineral Reserves results from our purchase of the remaining 25% interest in Puna Operations, which more than offset depletion and modelling adjustments. Proven Mineral Reserves are 3.8 million ounces (0.81 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 147 g/t) at December 31, 2019 compared to 4.4 million ounces (0.71 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 196 g/t) at December 31, 2018 and Probable Mineral Reserves are 45.9 million ounces (9.6 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 149 g/t) compared to 34.3 million ounces (7.03 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 152 g/t) at December 31, 2018. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) total 110.7 million ounces of silver within the open pit, underground and stockpiles at both Chinchillas and Pirquitas at December 31, 2019 compared to 89.0 million ounces at December 31, 2018. Measured Mineral Resources were 6.2 million ounces (1.51 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 127 g/t) at December 31, 2019 and Indicated Mineral Resources were 104.5 million ounces (27.4 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 119 g/t). Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated to total 42.7 million ounces (23.2 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 57 g/t) of silver at December 31, 2019, compared to 31.1 million ounces (16.8 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 58 g/t) of silver at December 31, 2018.

6.ANNUAL FINANCIAL RESULTS

We have provided the following consolidated financial information for each of the three most recently completed financial years:
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for per share amounts)
Years ended December 31
 
2019

2018

2017

Total revenue
$
606,850

$
420,675

$
448,773

Net income (loss)
55,757

(31
)
71,466

Net income attributable to equity holders of SSR Mining
57,315

6,379

69,316

Basic income per share attributable to equity holders of SSR Mining
0.47

0.05

0.58

Diluted income per share attributable to equity holders of SSR Mining
0.47

0.05

0.57

Total assets
1,750,107

1,521,138

1,537,454

Total non-current financial liabilities
292,978

262,038

233,180


Income Statement Review
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for per share amounts)

Realized gold and silver prices are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Section 10.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $55.8 million compared to a net loss of $0.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in net income was due to an increase in income from mine operations of $94.0 million, driven by increases in sales volumes at all our operations, including Puna Operations which declared commercial production at the end of 2018, combined with an increase in the average realized gold sales price, offset partially by higher unit production costs at Marigold due to fewer ore tonnes stacked in 2019 compared to 2018. In addition, as a result of the higher net income generated during the year ended December 31, 2019, income tax expense increased by $22.3 million compared to the prior year.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  20





 
2019

2018

Revenue
$
606,850

$
420,675

Cost of sales
 
 
   Production costs
(329,810
)
(245,111
)
   Depletion and depreciation
(106,157
)
(98,719
)
 
(435,967
)
(343,830
)
Income from mine operations
170,883

76,845

General and administrative expenses
(30,929
)
(32,941
)
Exploration, evaluation and reclamation expenses
(17,616
)
(14,009
)
Operating income
122,338

29,895

Interest and other finance income
11,910

11,761

Interest expense and other finance costs
(31,598
)
(33,630
)
Loss on redemption of convertible debt
(5,423
)
—

Other (expense) income
(5,739
)
(9,092
)
Foreign exchange (loss) gain
(5,359
)
9,156

Income before income taxes
86,129

8,090

Income tax expense
(30,372
)
(8,121
)
Net income (loss)
$
55,757

$
(31
)

Revenue

Total revenues increased by $186.2 million, or 44%, to $606.9 million for the year ended 2019, compared to $420.7 million in the comparative period of 2018. The increase was due primarily to an increase in gold sales revenue of $95.5 million from the Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation and increases in silver sales revenue of $64.6 million and lead sales revenue of $18.7 million from Puna Operations. The increase in gold sales revenue was due to higher sales volumes at Marigold and Seabee of 14% and 15%, respectively, combined with a 10% increase in the average realized gold sales price for the year ended 2019 compared to the prior year. The increase in silver and lead sales revenue was due to an increase in sales volume as we declared commercial production at Chinchillas in December 2018.

Production costs

Production costs increased by $84.7 million to $329.8 million for the year ended 2019, compared to $245.1 million in the comparative period of 2018. The increase was due primarily to an increase in gold and silver sales volumes at our operations and an increase in higher unit production costs at Marigold driven by fewer ore tonnes stacked in 2019 compared to 2018. These increases were offset partially by lower unit production costs at Puna Operations, as it ramped up operations in 2019 after declaring commercial production in 2018.

Depreciation and depletion

Year ended December 31
2019
2018
Change
Depreciation and depletion ($000s)
$
106,157

$
98,719

8
 %
Gold equivalent payable ounces sold (000s)
415

335

24
 %
Depreciation and depletion per equivalent ounce
$
256

$
295

(13
)%

The increase in depreciation and depletion of $7.5 million to $106.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $98.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 was due primarily to an increase in gold and silver sales volumes at all our operations, offset partially by the impact of higher depletable reserve base at both the Marigold mine and the Seabee Gold Operation.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  21




General and administrative expenses

For the year ended 2019, we recognized general and administrative expenses of $30.9 million compared to $32.9 million for the year ended 2018. The decrease in 2019 compared to 2018 is mainly due to lower salaries and benefits, consulting and professional fees and lower share-based compensation. General and administrative share-based compensation expense for the years ended 2019 and 2018 was $12.8 million and $13.4 million, respectively. Share-based compensation expense decreased primarily due to the impact of changing the 2018 and 2019 Performance Share Unit ("PSU") grants from cash-settled to equity-settled to reflect the intention of our Board of Directors to settle the PSUs in common shares.

Exploration, evaluation and reclamation costs

For the year ended 2019, exploration, evaluation and reclamation costs were $17.6 million, compared to $14.0 million for the year ended 2018. The majority of expensed expenditures for the year ended 2019 related to exploration work performed at the Seabee Gold Operation and our Trenton Canyon property. The majority of expensed expenditures for the year ended 2018 related to exploration work performed at the Seabee Gold Operation and the SIB project located near the former Eskay Creek mine in northwest British Columbia.

Interest and other finance income

Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Interest income
$
11,111

$
9,219

Accretion income on deferred consideration
799

2,542

 
$
11,910

$
11,761


Interest and other finance income of $11.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was comparable to the prior year. Interest income relates primarily to interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents balance. In accordance with our investment policy, we invest our cash in short-term investments or high interest savings accounts with maturities of 90 days or less.

Interest expense and other finance costs
 
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Interest expense on convertible notes
$
(23,049
)
$
(21,990
)
Accretion of reclamation and closure cost provision
(3,743
)
(3,459
)
Interest expense on moratorium liability
(2,542
)
(6,212
)
Other
(2,264
)
(1,969
)
 
$
(31,598
)
$
(33,630
)

For the year ended 2019, interest expense was mainly attributable to accretion and interest paid or accrued on our 2019 Notes and our 2013 Notes, while during the year ended 2018, interest expense was mainly attributable to accretion and interest paid or accrued on our 2013 Notes. The decrease in interest expense and other finance costs in 2019 compared to 2018 was primarily due to a decrease in interest expense on Puna Operations' moratorium liability due to a decrease in the average liability balance in 2019 compared to 2018, reflecting the principal repayments made during the periods and the devaluation of the Argentine peso.

Loss on redemption of convertible debt

In connection with the repurchase in March 2019 of $150 million of the outstanding $265 million of our 2013 Notes, we recognized a loss of $5.4 million, representing the difference between the estimated fair value of the debt portion redeemed and the book value of the repurchased 2013 Notes.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  22




Foreign exchange (loss) gain

For the year ended 2019, we recognized a foreign exchange loss of $5.4 million compared to a $9.2 million foreign exchange gain recognized for the year ended 2018. Our main foreign exchange exposures relate to net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Argentine pesos and Canadian dollars. The foreign exchange loss for the year ended 2019 resulted mainly due to a weaker Argentine peso in which our value-added tax ("VAT") receivable asset is denominated, partially offset by our declining moratorium liability and by a strengthening of the Canadian dollar and its impact on our net monetary assets denominated in Canadian dollars. The foreign exchange gain for the year ended 2018 resulted mainly from a significantly weaker Argentine peso at a time in which our moratorium liability exceeded our VAT receivable balance.

Income tax expense

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized an income tax expense of $30.4 million compared to $8.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. The total income tax expense in the year ended 2019 consists of a current tax expense of $24.8 million and deferred tax expense of $5.6 million. Income tax expense is a result of profitable operations at the Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, the metal concentrate and gold sales activities in Canada, as well as inflation adjustments on monetary items and an erosion of its tax basis due to the devaluation of the Argentine peso. This is partially offset by the impact of the general and administrative expenses incurred in Canada, $1.7 million of tax recovery from the repurchase of our 2013 Notes and the inflation adjustments to the tax basis of mineral properties, plant and equipment.

The total income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 consists of a current tax expense of $8.0 million and a deferred tax expense of $0.1 million. Income tax expense was a result of the restructuring of our Argentine business units, profitable operations at the Marigold mine and the Seabee Gold Operation, as well as the metal concentrate and gold sales activities in Canada, offset partially by the impact of general and administrative expenses in Canada.

Other comprehensive income

For the year ended 2019, we recognized a gain, net of tax, of $29.8 million on marketable securities compared to a loss of $37.7 million in the comparative period of 2018. The gain, net of tax, recognized in 2019 is mainly due to changes in the fair value of our investment in SilverCrest compared to the loss in the prior period which is mainly due to changes in the fair value of our investment in Pretium Resources Inc. ("Pretium"), which was fully sold in May 2018.

Financial Position and Liquidity
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)

 
As at December 31
 
2019

2018

Cash generated by operating activities
$
134,198

$
59,769

Cash flows from financing activities
(130,328
)
(115,930
)
Cash generated by financing activities
80,553

20,516

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
12

(5,007
)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
84,435

(40,652
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
419,212

459,864

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
503,647

$
419,212


Cash generated by operating activities

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash generated by operating activities was $134.2 million, an increase of 124% compared to the year ended 2018. The increase in cash generated by operating activities compared to the comparative period 2018 is driven by higher gold sales from our Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, as well as higher silver and base metal sales from our Puna Operations. Cash generated by operating activities in 2019 was impacted by a $61.0 million increase in non-cash working capital items, mainly driven by an increase in concentrate sales receivables related to our Puna Operations.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  23




Cash used in investing activities

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash used in investing activities was $130.3 million. We invested in $135.8 million in mineral properties, plant and equipment, including $55.9 million to purchase plant and equipment, $23.2 million in capitalized stripping costs at our Marigold mine and Puna Operations, $13.4 million in underground mine development costs at our Seabee Gold Operation, $11.6 million in Chinchillas project costs and $22.6 million to acquire the Properties contiguous to the Marigold mine. Additionally, we received interest of $9.7 million and $3.3 million in proceeds on the sale of marketable securities.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, we invested $67.7 million in plant and equipment and $16.6 million was invested in capitalized stripping and underground development at our Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation. We also invested $60.2 million in the development of the Chinchillas project and $23.1 million in the purchase of SilverCrest shares. We received $63.4 million from the sale of our remaining common shares of Pretium.

Cash generated by financing activities

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash generated by financing activities was $80.6 million compared to $20.5 million generated from financing activities for the year ended 2018. During 2019, we issued our 2019 Notes for net proceeds of $222.9 million and repurchased a portion of our 2013 Notes for $152.3 million. We also received proceeds of $7.2 million from the exercise of stock options and $3.7 million in funding from our non-controlling interest.

Cash generated by financing activities of $20.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 consisted of $15.2 million in funding from our non-controlling interest in Puna Operations and $5.3 million in proceeds received from the exercise of stock options.

Liquidity

At December 31, 2019, we had $503.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $84.4 million from December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2019, our working capital position of $665.5 million, was an increase of $15.6 million from $649.9 million at December 31, 2018. We manage our liquidity position with the objective of ensuring sufficient funds are available to meet planned operating requirements and providing support to fund strategic growth initiatives. Our cash balance at December 31, 2019, along with projected operating cash flows, are expected to be sufficient to fund planned activities over the next twelve months from the date of this MD&A. We continue to focus on capital allocation and our cost reduction strategy, while also implementing various optimization activities at our operations to improve the cash generating capacity of each operation.

Of our cash and cash equivalents balance, $500.4 million was held in Canada or the United States. At December 31, 2019, $2.5 million cash was held in Argentina. All cash is invested in short-term investments or high interest savings accounts under our investment policy with maturities of 90 days or less providing us with sufficient liquidity to meet our foreseeable corporate needs.

Capital Resources
Our objectives when managing capital are to:
▪
safeguard our ability to continue as a going concern in order to operate and optimize our current projects and pursue strategic growth initiatives; and
▪
maintain a flexible capital structure which lowers our cost of capital.

In assessing our capital structure, we include in our assessment the components of shareholders’ equity and our 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes. In order to facilitate the management of capital requirements, we prepare annual expenditure budgets and continuously monitor and review actual and forecasted cash flows. The annual budget and updated forecasts are monitored and approved by our Board of Directors.

To maintain or adjust the capital structure, we may, from time to time, issue new shares or debt, repay debt or dispose of non-core assets. We expect our current capital resources will be sufficient to meet our business requirements for a minimum of twelve months.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  24




In the first quarter of 2019, we issued the 2019 Notes for net proceeds of $222.9 million after payment of commissions and expenses related to the offering. The 2019 Notes mature on April 1, 2039 and bear an interest rate of 2.5% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. The 2019 Notes are convertible into our common shares at a fixed conversion rate, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. The 2019 Notes are convertible into our common shares at an initial conversion rate of 54.1082 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Notes converted, equivalent to an initial conversion price of $18.48 per common share.

Prior to April 1, 2023, we may not redeem the 2019 Notes, except in the event of certain changes in Canadian tax laws. On or after April 1, 2023 and prior to April 1, 2026, we may redeem all or part of the 2019 Notes for cash, but only if the last reported sales price of our common shares for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days exceeds 130% of the conversion price in effect on each such trading day. On or after April 1, 2026, we may redeem the 2019 Notes in full or in part, for cash. Holders of the 2019 Notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or part of their 2019 Notes on April 1 of each of 2026, 2029 and 2034, or upon certain fundamental corporate changes. The repurchase price will be equal to 100% of the 2019 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the repurchase date.

Concurrent with the 2019 Notes offering, we repurchased, in separate privately negotiated transactions, $150.0 million
of our outstanding $265 million of 2013 Notes.

At December 30, 2019, holders of our 2013 Notes had the right to exercise the Put Option pursuant to the terms of the Indenture any time before January 31, 2020. As of December 30, 2019, there was $115,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the 2013 Notes outstanding.

On January 31, 2020, as of the expiration of the Put Option, $49,000 aggregate principal amount of the 2013 Notes were validly surrendered for purchase. The remaining outstanding 2013 Notes are callable by us at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, at any time at our election giving due notice, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Indenture. On February 13, 2020, we provided notice of redemption to call the remaining outstanding 2013 Notes. We will redeem all of our outstanding 2013 Notes on March 30, 2020 totaling an aggregate principal amount of $114,947,000 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, unless any of the outstanding 2013 Notes are converted into common shares of the Company in accordance with the terms of the 2013 Notes. Following the redemption of the 2013 Notes, no 2013 Notes will remain outstanding.

Our $75 million senior secured revolving credit facility has a term to June 8, 2020, with a $25.0 million accordion. As of December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with our externally-imposed financial covenants in relation to the Credit Facility. We do not have any financial covenants in relation to our 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes.

Outstanding share data

The authorized capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without par value. As at February 20, 2020, the following common shares and options were outstanding:
 
 

 
Remaining life
 
Number of shares

Exercise price (C$)
(years)
Capital stock
123,239,940

 
 
Stock options
1,970,317

5.83 - 24.99
0.81 - 6.87
Other share-based compensation awards
1,105,559

 
0.11 - 9.87
Fully diluted
126,315,816

 
 


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  25





7.QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS

The following table sets out selected financial results for each of the eight most recently completed quarters, expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and per ounce amounts:
 
2019
2018
(in thousands of U.S. dollars,
unless otherwise noted)
31-Dec

30-Sep

30-Jun

31-Mar

31-Dec

30-Sep

30-Jun

31-Mar

Revenue
177,603

147,848

155,149

126,250

103,712

115,033

104,028

97,902

Gold equivalent payable ounces sold
114,268

95,112

112,022

93,452

82,439

96,337

80,937

74,922

Realized gold price ($/oz) (1)
1,480

1,480

1,314

1,303

1,230

1,208

1,304

1,334

Realized silver price ($/oz) (1)
17.32

17.31

14.92

15.35

14.42

15.45

16.49

16.79

Income from mine operations
58,913

51,906

29,827

30,237

16,536

21,875

21,203

17,231

Income (loss) before tax
31,148

32,981

13,103

8,897

(7,559
)
6,632

9,823

(806
)
Net income (loss)
19,479

18,132

12,414

5,732

(2,544
)
2,228

2,607

(2,322
)
Attributable income (loss) to equity holders of SSR Mining
19,479

20,741

10,631

6,464

(3,486
)
6,374

5,117

(1,626
)
Basic attributable income (loss) per share
0.16

0.17

0.09

0.05

(0.03
)
0.05

0.04

(0.01
)
Diluted attributable income (loss) per share
0.16

0.17

0.09

0.05

(0.03
)
0.05

0.04

(0.01
)
Cash and cash equivalents
503,647

474,479

452,160

461,351

419,212

474,511

493,642

472,901

Total assets
1,750,107

1,688,443

1,650,222

1,607,142

1,521,138

1,503,717

1,504,987

1,490,123

Working capital (2)
665,491

636,310

599,685

616,758

649,865

649,448

671,967

685,731

Non-current financial liabilities
169,769

588,346

169,347

167,643

247,551

243,858

240,234

236,685


(1) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of realized metal prices per payable ounce of precious metals sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at our mines. For a better understanding of these measures, please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Section 10.
(2) 
Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.

The volatility in revenue over the past eight quarters has resulted from variable precious metals prices, which are not under our control, and sales volumes. There are no significant seasonal fluctuations in the results for the presented periods. Over the past eight quarters, realized gold prices have ranged between $1,208 and $1,481 per payable ounce of gold sold and realized silver prices have ranged between $14.42 and $17.32 per payable ounce of silver sold. Sales volumes have been impacted by generally increasing production at the Seabee Gold Operation, normal production variations at the Marigold mine due to its nature as a run-of-mine heap leach operation and increasing production at Puna Operations after commercial production was declared at the Chinchillas mine on December 1, 2018.

Income from mine operations broadly follows the trend in revenue. Gross margin, defined as income from mine operations divided by revenue, decreased following the Pirquitas pit closure at Puna Operations in early 2017 until the Chinchillas mine was brought into commercial production in December 2018. From time to time, certain periods are impacted by non-cash adjustments. There have been no significant non-cash adjustments impacting income from mine operations over the past eight quarters.

Net income (loss) before and after income tax has fluctuated significantly over the past eight quarters, as it has been heavily influenced by operating performance and other adjustments. Net income for the third quarter of 2019 was negatively impacted by $6.8 million of deferred tax expense, primarily related to the devaluation of the Argentine peso. Net income for the first quarter of 2019 was negatively impacted by a $5.4 million loss on redemption of a portion of our 2013 Notes. Net income for the fourth quarter of 2018 was negatively impacted by a $2.8 million expense related to the premium paid over the prevailing market price on the purchase of SilverCrest shares. Net income for the second quarter of 2018 was negatively impacted by the recognition of a $5.8 million income tax expense related to the re-organization of our business units in Argentina.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  26





Three months ended December 31, 2019, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2018
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for per share amounts)

Three months ended December 31

2019

2018

Revenue
$
177,603

$
103,712

Cost of sales
 
 
Production costs
(89,179
)
(64,175
)
Depletion and depreciation
(29,511
)
(23,001
)
 
(118,690
)
(87,176
)
Income from mine operations
58,913

16,536

General and administrative expenses
(10,242
)
(12,108
)
Exploration, evaluation and reclamation expenses
(5,443
)
(1,367
)
Operating income
43,228

3,061

Interest and other finance income
1,669

3,202

Interest expense and other finance costs
(7,545
)
(8,205
)
Other expense
(1,571
)
(3,618
)
Foreign exchange loss
(4,633
)
(1,999
)
Income (loss) before taxes
31,148

(7,559
)
Income tax (expense) recovery
(11,669
)
5,015

Net income (loss)
$
19,479

$
(2,544
)

Net income attributable to our shareholders for the three months ended December 31, 2019 was $19.5 million ($0.16 per share), compared to a net loss of $3.5 million (($0.03) per share) in the same period of 2018. The following is a summary and discussion of the significant components of income and expenses recorded during the three months ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in the prior year.

Revenue

In the three months ended December 31, 2019, we recognized total revenues of $177.6 million, compared to $103.7 million in the comparative period of 2018. The increase was due to higher gold sales from the Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation and higher silver sales from Puna Operations.

Production costs

Production costs increased by $25.0 million to $89.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2019, compared to $64.2 million in the comparative period of 2018. The increase was due primarily to an increase in gold and silver production at our operations. These increases were offset partially by lower unit production costs at Puna Operations, as it ramped up operations in 2019 after declaring commercial production in 2018, and at Marigold mine as a result of higher tonnes stacked. Unit production costs at Seabee Gold Operation were flat during the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the prior period.

Depreciation and depletion

Three months ended December 31
2019
2018
Change
Depreciation and depletion ($000s)
$
29,511

$
23,001

28
 %
Gold equivalent payable ounces sold (000s)
114

82

39
 %
Depreciation and depletion per equivalent ounce
$
259

$
281

(8
)%

Depreciation and depletion costs increased by $6.5 million to $29.5 million for the year three months ended December 31, 2019 compared to $23.0 million for the comparative period 2018. The increase is due primarily to an increase in gold and silver sales volumes at all our operations, offset partially by a lower average depletable base.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  27




General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2019 were $10.2 million compared to $12.1 million in the three months ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to lower share- based compensation and salaries and benefits in the current period relative to the comparative period 2018. General and administrative share-based compensation expense for three months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $5.3 million and $8.1 million, respectively. Share-based compensation expense decreased primarily due to the impact of changing the 2018 and 2019 PSU grants from cash-settled to equity-settled to reflect the intention of the Board of Directors to settle the PSUs in common shares.

Exploration, evaluation and reclamation expenses

Exploration, evaluation and reclamation costs of $5.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2019 were lower than the $1.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2018. The majority of expenditures in the three months ended December 31, 2019 related to greenfield exploration work performed at our Trenton Canyon property and our Seabee Gold Operation. The majority of expenditures in the three months ended December 31, 2018 related to greenfield exploration work performed at the Seabee Gold Operation.

Interest and other finance income

For the three months ended December 31, 2019, interest and other finance income was $1.7 million compared to $3.2 million for the comparative period 2018. Interest income relates primarily to interest earned on our cash balance. In accordance with our investment policy, we invest our cash in short-term investments or high interest savings accounts with maturities of 90 days or less.

Interest expense and other finance costs
 
Three months ended December 31
2019

2018

Interest expense on convertible notes
$
(5,839
)
$
(5,613
)
Accretion of reclamation and closure cost provision
(764
)
(1,137
)
Interest expense on moratorium liability
(54
)
(29
)
Other
(888
)
(1,426
)
 
$
(7,545
)
$
(8,205
)

For the three months ended December 31, 2019, interest expense and other finance costs were $7.5 million compared to $8.2 million for the comparative period 2018. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the interest expense was mainly attributable to accretion and interest paid or accrued on our 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes, while in the fourth quarter of 2018, the interest expense was mainly attributable to accretion and interest paid or accrued on our 2013 Notes. The decrease in interest expense and other finance costs is mainly due to a decrease in interest expense on Puna Operations' moratorium liability resulting from a decrease in the average liability balance in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the fourth quarter of 2018, reflecting repayments of principal made during the periods.

Foreign exchange loss

We recognized a foreign exchange loss for the three months ended December 31, 2019 of $4.6 million compared to a foreign exchange loss of $2.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2018. Our main foreign exchange exposures are related to net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Argentine pesos and Canadian dollars. During the three months ended December 31, 2019, the foreign exchange loss was mainly due to a weaker Argentine peso in which our VAT receivable asset is denominated, partially offset by our declining moratorium liability. During the three months ended December 31, 2018, the foreign exchange loss resulted mainly from a strengthening of the Argentine peso after a significant decline earlier in the year during a period where our moratorium liability exceeded our VAT receivables.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  28




Income tax expense

For the three months ended December 31, 2019, we recognized an income tax expense of $11.7 million compared to an income tax recovery of $5.0 million in the three months ended December 31, 2018. The income tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2019 consists of a current tax expense of $7.7 million and a deferred tax expense of $4.0 million. Income tax expense is a result of profitable operations at the Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, the metal concentrate and gold sales activities in Canada, offset partially by the impact of the general and administrative expenses incurred in Canada. Further, income tax expense in the period included $4.5 million of deferred tax expense related to Puna Operations. Deferred tax expense for Puna Operations arises primarily due to inflation adjustments on monetary items and an erosion of its tax basis due to the devaluation of the Argentine peso, partially offset by inflation adjustments to the tax basis of mineral properties, plant and equipment.

The income tax expense for the three months ended December 31, 2018 consists of a current tax expense of $0.3 million and a deferred tax recovery of $5.3 million. The total income tax expense for the period was a result of the restructuring of our business units in Argentina, profitable operations at the Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, as well as the metal concentrate and gold sales activities in Canada. Offsets to the income tax expense items include the general and administrative expenses in Canada and a $5.1 million recovery of tax expense related to inflation adjustments to the tax basis of mineral properties, plant and equipment in Argentina.

Other comprehensive income

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognized a gain, net of tax, of $12.5 million on marketable securities, compared to a gain of $2.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2018. The gain, net of tax, recognized in the fourth quarter of 2019 current period is mainly due to changes in the fair value of our investment in SilverCrest.

Financial Position and Liquidity
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)

 
Three months ended December 31
 
2019

2018

Cash generated by (used in) operating activities
$
48,632

$
(3,744
)
Cash used in investing activities
(22,303
)
(63,027
)
Cash (used in) generated by financing activities
(251
)
11,903

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
3,090

(431
)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
29,168

(55,299
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
474,479

474,511

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
503,647

$
419,212


Cash generated by operating activities

In the fourth quarter of 2019, cash generated by operating activities was $48.6 million compared to cash used by operating activities of $3.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2018. The increase in cash generated by operating activities compared to the comparative period 2018 is driven by higher gold sales from our Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, as well as higher silver sales from our Puna Operations. Cash generated from operating activities was impacted by a $12.9 million increase in non-cash working capital items, mainly driven by an increase in production and therefore, concentrate sales, at our Puna Operations in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Cash used in investing activities

In the fourth quarter of 2019, cash used in investing activities was $22.3 million compared to $63.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2018. The decrease in cash used in investing activities in the fourth quarter of 2019 is mainly due to lower expenditures on mineral properties, plant and equipment of $11.9 million compared to the same period in the prior year, driven by a $13.1 million decrease in Chinchillas project cost expenditures after commercial production of the mine was declared in December 2018. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we also invested $23.1 million in marketable securities, which was primarily related to our investment in SilverCrest, and loaned $8.0 million to our joint venture partner in Puna Operations. We did not make similar investments in the fourth quarter of 2019.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  29




Cash generated by (used in) financing activities

In the fourth quarter of 2019, we used $0.3 million in financing activities, primarily related to lease payments. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we generated $11.9 million from financing activities, which was due to $8.8 million received from our joint venture partner in Puna Operations and $3.1 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

8. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED RISKS

We are exposed to a variety of financial risks as a result of our operations, including market risk (which includes price risk, currency risk and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. Our overall risk management strategy seeks to reduce potential adverse effects on our financial performance. Risk management is carried out under policies approved by our Board of Directors.

We may, from time to time, use foreign exchange contracts, commodity price contracts, equity hedges and interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency, metal and energy prices, marketable securities values and interest rates. We do not have a practice of trading derivatives. Our use of derivatives is limited to specific programs to manage fluctuations in foreign exchange, diesel prices and marketable securities risks, which are subject to the oversight of our Board of Directors.

The risks associated with our financial instruments, and the policies on how we mitigate those risks are set out below. This is not intended to be a comprehensive discussion of all risks.
a)Market Risk
This is the risk that the fair values of financial instruments will fluctuate owing to changes in market prices. The significant market risks to which we are exposed are price risk, currency risk and interest rate risk.
(i)  Price Risk
This is the risk that the fair values or future cash flows of our financial instruments will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Income from mine operations in the next year depends on the metal prices for gold and silver, lead and zinc and also prices of input commodities such as diesel. These prices are affected by numerous factors that are outside of our control, such as:
▪global or regional consumption patterns;
▪the supply of, and demand for, these commodities;
▪speculative activities;
▪the availability and costs of substitutes;
▪inflation; and
▪political and economic conditions, including interest rates and currency values.
The principal financial instruments that we hold which are impacted by commodity prices are our concentrate trade receivables. The majority of our sales agreements are subject to pricing terms that settle within one to four months after delivery of concentrate, and this adjustment period represents our trade receivable exposure to variations in commodity prices.
We have not hedged the price of any metal as part of our overall corporate strategy.
We hedge a portion of our diesel consumption with the objective of securing future costs. We executed swap and option contracts under a risk management policy approved by our Board of Directors. In addition, due to the ice road supply at the Seabee Gold Operation, we purchase annual consumable supplies in advance at prices which are generally fixed at time of purchase, not during period of use.
A 10% increase or decrease in the silver prices as at December 31, 2019, with all other variables held constant, would have resulted in a $2,260,000 (December 31, 2018 - $891,000) increase or decrease to our trade receivables and after-tax net income.

As we do not have trade receivables for gold sales, movements in gold prices do not impact the value of any financial instruments.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  30





The costs relating to our production activities vary depending on market prices on consumables including diesel fuel and electricity.
During 2019, in accordance with our risk management policy, we have used swaps and options to manage a portion of our cost of diesel. As at December 31, 2019, the fair value of derivative instruments related to our diesel hedges was ($348,000) (December 31, 2018 - ($1,908,000)).
Marigold Mine
Our instruments are based on the Ultra Low Sulphur Gulf Coast Diesel Index for diesel consumed at the Marigold mine. As at December 31, 2019, we have hedged the following future anticipated usage at the Marigold mine:

2020

2021

Gallons hedged (in thousands)
4,200

600

Portion of forecast diesel hedged
41.2
%
5.9
%
Floor price ($/gallon)
1.72

1.50

Cap price ($/gallon)
2.22

2.19

As at December 31, 2019, the spot price of diesel was $1.95 per gallon. As and when it is determined to be favourable, we may execute additional diesel fuel hedges under our risk management policy.

Seabee Gold Operation
As at December 31, 2019, we have not hedged future anticipated diesel usage at the Seabee Gold Operation. As and when it is determined to be favourable, we may execute additional diesel fuel hedges under our risk management policy.
Marketable Securities
We hold certain investments in marketable securities which are measured at fair value, being the closing share price of each equity investment at the balance sheet date. We are exposed to changes in share prices which would result in gains and losses being recognized in other comprehensive income. A 10% change in prices would have a $5,748,000 impact on total comprehensive income at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 - $2,555,000). We did not hedge any securities in 2019 or 2018.

(ii)  Currency Risk

Currency risk is the risk that the fair values or future cash flows of our financial instruments and other assets and liabilities will fluctuate because of changes in foreign currency rates. Our financial instruments are exposed to currency risk where those instruments are denominated in currencies that are not the same as the functional currency of the entity that holds them; foreign exchange gains and losses in these situations impact earnings.
The following are the most significant areas of exposure to currency risk, shown in thousands of U.S. dollars:
 
December 31, 2019
 
Canadian dollar

Argentine peso

Cash
$
4,786

$
146

Value added tax receivable
148

19,023

Other financial assets
—

1,250

Trade and other payables (excluding income taxes)
(26,695
)
(13,411
)
Reclamation and closure cost provision
(6,239
)
—

Moratorium
—

(9,120
)
Total
$
(28,000
)
$
(2,112
)


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  31




 
December 31, 2018
 
Canadian dollar

Argentine peso

Cash
$
7,982

$
1,604

Value added tax receivable
145

17,039

Other financial assets
—

1,098

Trade and other payables (excluding income taxes)
(22,974
)
(9,908
)
Reclamation and closure cost provision
(5,752
)
—

Moratorium
—

(19,057
)
Total
$
(20,599
)
$
(9,224
)

We monitor and manage this risk with the objective of ensuring our company-wide exposure to negative fluctuations in currencies against the U.S. dollar is managed.
 
Over the course of 2019, the Argentine peso continued to devalue by approximately 59% compared to 102% in 2018. We have a net Argentine peso liability position which has resulted in foreign exchange gains as a result of the devaluation of the Argentine peso.

The Canadian dollar was relatively stable through most of 2019, ending the year having appreciated by 5% (2018 - depreciated by 8.7%) and closing at $1.30 Canadian dollar per one U.S. dollar. We have a net Canadian dollar liability position which has resulted in foreign exchange losses as a result of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar.

Our Seabee Gold Operation has exposure to Canadian dollar operating and capital costs. Under our risk management policy, we have entered into options to manage this exposure. As at December 31, 2019, we had the following hedge positions outstanding:

2020

2021

Notional amount (in thousands of Canadian dollars)
54,000

—

Portion of forecast exposure hedged
39.1
%
—
%
Floor level (Canadian dollars per $1 U.S. dollar)
1.2757

—

Cap level (Canadian dollars per $1 U.S. dollar)
1.3683

—


As at December 31, 2019, the fair value of derivative instruments related to our foreign currency hedges was $350,000 (December 31, 2018 ($890,000)).

We assessed the impact of a 10% change in the U.S. dollar exchange rate relative to the Canadian dollar and a 25% change in the U.S. dollar exchange rate relative to the Argentina peso as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 on financial assets and liabilities, with all other variables held constant.

The respective changes in each currency would have resulted in the following impact to our total comprehensive income:
Years ended December 31
2019

2018

Canadian dollar
$
2,044

$
1,504

Argentine peso
370

1,614

(iii)  Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair values or future cash flows of our financial instruments will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from the interest rate impact on our cash and cash equivalents and our moratorium liability because these are the only financial instruments we hold that are impacted by interest based on variable market interest rates. The 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes have a fixed interest rate and are not exposed to fluctuations in interest rates. A change in interest rates would impact the fair value of the 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes, but because we record the 2013 Notes and 2019 Notes at amortized cost, there would be no impact on our financial results. We monitor our exposure to interest rates closely and have not entered into any derivative contracts to manage our risk.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  32




As at December 31, 2019, the weighted average interest rate earned on our cash and cash equivalents was 1.8% (December 31, 2018 - 2.4%). With other variables unchanged, a 1.0% change in the annualized interest rate would impact after-tax net income by $3,274,000 (December 31, 2018 - $3,372,000).
b)Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to discharge its obligations under the terms of a financial contract. Our credit risk is limited to the following instruments:

(i) Credit risk related to financial institutions and cash deposits

Under our investment policy, investments are made only in highly-rated financial institutions and corporate and government securities. We diversify our holdings and consider the risk of loss associated with investments to be low.

(ii) Credit risk related to trade receivables

We are exposed to credit risk through our trade receivables on concentrate sales, which are principally with internationally-recognized counterparties. Payments of receivables are scheduled, routine and received within a contractually agreed time frame. We manage this risk through provisional payments of at least 75% of the value of the concentrate shipped, through transacting with multiple counterparties and retaining title to the concentrate for the majority of our sales until we receive the first provisional payment.

(iii) Credit risk related to other financial assets

Our credit risk with respect to other financial assets includes deferred consideration following the sales of various mineral properties. We have security related to these payments in the event of default.

We also have credit risk through our significant VAT receivables and other receivables balance that is collectible from the government of Argentina. The balance is expected to be recoverable in full, however due to legislative rules and the complex collection process, a significant portion of the asset is classified as non-current until government approval of the recovery claim is approved.

Our maximum exposure to credit risk as at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was as follows:
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

Cash and cash equivalents
$
503,647

$
419,212

Value added tax receivable
21,416

18,802

Trade receivables and other assets
54,164

11,287

Other financial assets
17,964

28,883

 
$
597,191

$
478,184

At December 31, 2019, no amounts were held as collateral except those discussed above related to other financial assets.
c)Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our obligations associated with financial liabilities as they fall due. We manage our liquidity risk through a rigorous planning, budgeting and forecasting process, which is reviewed and updated on a regular basis, to help determine the funding requirements to support our current operations, expansion and development plans, and by managing our capital structure as described in Note 26(d) of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our objective is to ensure that there are sufficient committed financial resources to meet our business requirements for a minimum of twelve months.
To supplement corporate liquidity, we have a credit facility of which we utilized $580,000 (December 31, 2018 - $8,000,000) to secure certain obligations arising under workers' compensation insurance.
In addition, we use surety bonds to support certain environmental bonding obligations. As at December 31, 2019, we had surety bonds totaling $84,431,000 outstanding (December 31, 2018 - $54,053,000).

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  33




We enter into contracts that give rise to commitments in the normal course of business for future minimum payments. The following table summarizes the remaining contractual maturities of our financial liabilities, operating and capital commitments, shown in contractual undiscounted cash flows:
 
Payments due by period (as at December 31, 2019)

Less than one year

1 - 3 years

4-5 years

After 5 years

Total

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
92,018

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
92,018

Moratorium liability
3,537

5,583

—

—

9,120

Convertible notes (principal portion)(1)
115,000

—

—

230,000

345,000

Interest payments on convertible notes(1)
7,403

11,500

11,500

8,625

39,028

Reclamation and closure costs
9,556

5,694

—

115,438

130,688

Operating expenditure commitments
6,539

1,137

980

2,440

11,096

Capital expenditure commitments
13,311

—

—

—

13,311

Total contractual obligations
247,364

23,914

12,480

356,503

640,261


(1) 
Refer to section 6 for details of convertible notes.

We believe working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, at December 31, 2019, together with future cash flows from operations, are sufficient to support our commitments through 2020.


9.RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

The mining industry involves many risks which are inherent to the nature of the business, global economic trends and economic, environmental and social conditions in the geographical areas of operation. As a result, we are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, each of which could have an adverse effect on our operating results, business prospects or financial position. We continuously assess and evaluate these risks and minimize them by implementing high operating standards and processes to identify, assess, report and monitor risks across our organization.

For a comprehensive list of other risks and uncertainties affecting our business, please refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors" in our most recent Annual Information Form, which is available at www.sedar.com, and our most recent Annual Report on Form 40-F, which is available on the EDGAR section of the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

There has been no significant known change in our risks and uncertainties.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  34





10.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

We have included certain non-GAAP performance measures throughout this document. These performance measures are employed by us to measure our operating and economic performance internally and to assist in decision-making, as well as providing key performance information to senior management. We believe that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, certain investors and other stakeholders also use this information to evaluate our operating and financial performance; however, these non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, these performance measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements.
Non-GAAP financial measures - Cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of precious metals sold
We use total cash costs per ounce of precious metals sold, a non-GAAP financial measure, to monitor our operating performance internally, including operating cash costs. We believe this measure provides investors and analysts with useful information about our underlying cash costs of operations and the impact of by-product credits on our cost structure. We also believe it is a relevant metric used to understand our operating profitability and ability to generate cash flow. When deriving the production costs associated with an ounce of precious metal, we include the by-product credits as we consider the cost to produce the gold or silver is reduced as a result of the by-product sales incidental to the gold and silver production process; thereby allowing our management and other stakeholders to assess the net costs of gold and silver production. Cash costs per ounce metrics, net of by-product credits, are also used in our internal decision making processes.

AISC includes total production costs incurred at our mining operations, which forms the basis of our by-product cash costs. Additionally, we include sustaining capital expenditures, general and administrative expenses, mine-site exploration and evaluation costs and reclamation cost accretion and amortization. This measure seeks to reflect the full cost of gold and silver production from current operations, therefore expansionary capital and non-sustaining expenditures are excluded. Certain other cash expenditures, including tax payments and financing costs are also excluded. We believe that this measure represents the total costs of producing gold from current operations and provides us and other stakeholders with additional information about our operating performance and ability to generate cash flows. It allows us to assess our ability to support capital expenditures and to sustain future production from the generation of operating cash flows.

On November 16, 2018, the World Council announced an update to its Guidance Note on AISC with application effective January 1, 2019. This update is intended to provide additional transparency about the costs of gold production and support further consistency of application of the Guidance Note. The major updates to the Guidance Note include providing a more specific definition of non-sustaining costs as those costs incurred at "new operations" and costs related to "major projects at existing operations" where these projects will materially benefit the operation in the future. The Guidance Note has defined "material benefit" as an increase of at least 10% in annual or life of mine production, net present value or reserves compared to the remaining life of the operation. We adopted the updates to the Guidance Note, effective September 30, 2019. Prior period comparatives have been updated to align with the updated Guidance Note.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  35







The following table provides a reconciliation of our consolidated interim and annual statements of income to cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of precious metals sold for the three and twelve month periods indicated below:


(in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise noted)
Q4 2019

Q3 2019

Q2 2019

Q1 2019

Total 2019

Total 2018

Marigold mine
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales (A)
$
59,936

$
52,755

$
64,100

$
59,282

$
236,073

$
200,128

Add: Treatment and refining costs
62

68

56

73

259

372

Less: By-product revenue
(19
)
(25
)
(13
)
(14
)
(71
)
(64
)
Less: Depreciation and depletion
(12,464
)
(11,204
)
(14,333
)
(14,290
)
(52,291
)
(56,748
)
Cash costs
47,515

41,594

49,810

45,051

183,970

143,688

Sustaining capital expenditures
17,768

10,496

6,924

3,167

38,355

30,962

Capitalized stripping costs
2,116

2,031

871

2,293

7,311

7,489

Exploration and evaluation costs (sustaining)
332

1,336

954

636

3,258

10,209

Reclamation and closure costs
449

409

268

429

1,555

1,296

AISC (D)
$
68,180

$
55,866

$
58,827

$
51,576

$
234,449

$
193,644

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Seabee Gold Operation
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales (B)
$
22,406

$
19,196

$
20,475

$
22,759

$
84,836

$
84,872

Add: Treatment and refining costs
46

(4
)
52

33

127

166

Less: By-product revenue
(24
)
(11
)
(7
)
(8
)
(50
)
(46
)
Less: Depreciation and depletion
(10,124
)
(8,771
)
(7,761
)
(9,712
)
(36,368
)
(38,818
)
Cash costs
12,304

10,410

12,759

13,072

48,545

46,174

Sustaining capital expenditures
2,633

5,406

3,358

8,772

20,169

7,053

Capitalized development
3,313

3,352

3,345

3,379

13,389

9,074

Exploration and evaluation costs (sustaining)
—

768

605

1,251

2,624

6,503

Reclamation and closure costs
35

34

34

34

137

135

AISC (E)
$
18,285

$
19,970

$
20,101

$
26,508

$
84,864

$
68,939

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Puna Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales (C)
$
36,348

$
23,991

$
40,747

$
13,972

$
115,058

$
58,830

Add: Treatment and refining costs
2,916

1,687

3,887

1,709

10,199

4,377

Less: By-product revenue
(10,388
)
(4,178
)
(12,306
)
(6,116
)
(32,988
)
(3,079
)
Less: Depreciation and depletion
(6,921
)
(1,353
)
(8,078
)
(1,146
)
(17,498
)
(3,153
)
Cash costs
21,955

20,147

24,250

8,419

74,771

56,975

Sustaining capital expenditure
2,134

1,839

1,157

1,543

6,673

9,680

Capitalized stripping costs
2,565

1,385

6,273

6,191

16,414

—

Exploration and evaluation costs (sustaining)
492

229

65

1

787

—

Reclamation and closure costs
433

994

605

590

2,622

2,548

AISC (F)
$
27,579

$
24,594

$
32,350

$
16,744

$
101,267

$
69,203

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales, per consolidated statement of (loss) income (A+B+C)
$
118,690

$
95,942

$
125,322

$
96,013

$
435,967

$
343,830

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AISC (total for all mines) (D+E+F)
$
114,044

$
100,430

$
111,278

$
94,828

$
420,580

$
331,786

General and administrative costs
10,242

7,602

6,214

6,871

30,929

32,941

AISC - consolidated
$
124,286

$
108,032

$
117,492

$
101,699

$
451,509

$
364,727


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  36




 
Q4 2019

Q3 2019

Q2 2019

Q1 2019

Total 2019

Total 2018

Marigold mine
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payable ounces of gold sold (oz)
61,054

50,617

59,666

55,486

226,823

198,780

Cash costs per gold ounce sold ($/oz)
$
778

$
822

$
835

$
812

$
811

$
723

AISC per gold ounce sold ($/oz)
$
1,117

$
1,104

$
986

$
930

$
1,034

$
974

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Seabee Gold Operation
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payable ounces of gold sold (oz)
24,350

27,928

24,264

27,985

104,527

91,360

Cash costs per gold ounce sold ($/oz)
$
505

$
373

$
526

$
467

$
464

$
505

AISC per gold ounce sold ($/oz)
$
751

$
715

$
828

$
947

$
812

$
755

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Puna Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payable ounces of silver sold (oz)
2,466,481

1,416,487

2,474,058

847,286

7,204,312

3,580,095

Cash costs per silver ounce sold ($/oz)
$
8.90

$
14.22

$
9.80

$
9.94

$
10.38

$
15.91

AISC per silver ounce sold ($/oz)
$
11.18

$
17.36

$
13.08

$
19.76

$
14.06

$
19.33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gold price ($/oz)
$
1,480

$
1,480

$
1,314

$
1,303

$
1,394

$
1,263

Realized silver price ($/oz)
$
17.32

$
17.31

$
14.92

$
15.35

$
16.26

$
15.92

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Precious metals equivalency
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total cash costs (for all metals)
$
81,774

$
72,151

$
86,819

$
66,542

$
307,286

$
246,837

Equivalent payable gold ounces sold (1) (2)
114,268

95,112

112,022

93,452

415,383

335,267

Cash costs per equivalent gold ounce sold ($/oz)
$
716

$
759

$
775

$
712

$
740

$
736

Consolidated AISC per equivalent gold ounce sold ($/oz)
$
1,088

$
1,136

$
1,049

$
1,088

$
1,087

$
1,088

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1) 
Gold equivalent ounces have been established using realized metal prices per payable ounce of precious metal sold in the period and applied to the recovered metal content of the gold and silver sold by the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations. We have not included zinc and lead as they are considered a by-product.
(2) 
Equivalent payable gold ounces sold may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

Non-GAAP financial measures - adjusted attributable net income
We have included the non-GAAP financial performance measures of adjusted attributable income before tax, adjusted attributable income tax expense, adjusted attributable net income and adjusted basic attributable income per share. Adjusted attributable net income excludes gains/losses and other costs incurred for acquisitions and disposals of mineral properties and exploration and evaluation assets, impairment charges and reversals, unrealized and realized gains and losses on financial instruments, significant non-cash foreign exchange impacts as well as other significant non-cash, non-recurring items. We exclude these items from net income to provide a measure which allows investors to evaluate the operating results of our underlying core operations and our ability to generate liquidity through operating cash flow to fund working capital requirements, future capital expenditures and service outstanding debt. We believe that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, certain investors may use this information to evaluate our performance.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  37




The following table provides a reconciliation of adjusted net income to the consolidated financial statements:

 
Year ended December 31,
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)
2019

2018

 
 
 
Income before income tax
$
86,129

$
8,090

Non-controlling interest
1,558

6,410

Income before tax attributable to our equity holders
87,687

14,500

 
 
 
Adjusted for:
 
 
Non-cash finance expense, net of non-cash finance income
17,556

15,252

Non-cash foreign exchange loss (gain)
14,519

(11,862
)
Impairment charges
573

—

Loss on convertible notes
5,423

—

Write-down/loss on disposal of mineral properties, plant and equipment
2,409

5,359

Loss (gain) on purchase of SilverCrest common shares
(2,396
)
2,782

Adjustments to reclamation and closure cost provision
—

(1,580
)
Write-down of deferred consideration asset
3,677

—

Other items
(29
)
4,135

Adjusted income before tax attributable to our equity holders
129,419

28,586

 
 
 
Income tax expense per Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss)
(30,372
)
(8,121
)
 
 
 
Adjusted for:
 
 
Change in prior period estimates
(1,793
)
662

Change in economic estimates related to reclamation and closure costs
2,635

—

Change in tax rate
—

(127
)
Argentina reorganization
—

4,712

Initial recognition of deferred tax in Argentina
—

2,649

Tax impact of purchase of SilverCrest common shares
426

(376
)
Tax impact of the redemption of 2013 convertible notes
(1,687
)
—

Other items
(413
)
(24
)
Adjusted attributable income tax expense
(31,204
)
(625
)
 
 
 
Adjusted attributable net income
$
98,215

$
27,961

 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding (000's)
121,769

120,137

 
 
 
Adjusted basic attributable income per share ($)
$
0.81

$
0.23




SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  38




 
Three months ended December 31,
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted)
2019

2018

 
 
 
Income (loss) before tax per consolidated statements of income (loss)
$
31,148

$
(7,559
)
Non-controlling interest
—

(942
)
Income (loss) before tax attributable to our shareholders
31,148

(8,501
)
 
 
 
Adjusted for:
 
 
Non-cash finance expense, net of non-cash finance income
4,873

3,745

Non-cash foreign exchange loss
8,268

745

Write-down/loss on disposal of mineral properties, plant and equipment
1,601

686

Loss (gain) on purchase of SilverCrest common shares
(1,639
)
2,782

Adjustments to reclamation and closure cost provision
—

(1,580
)
Write-down of deferred consideration asset
3,677

—

Other items
283

1,778

Adjusted attributable income before tax
48,211

(345
)
 
 
 
Income tax (expense) recovery for the period
(11,669
)
5,015

 
 
 
Adjusted for:
 
 
Change in prior period estimates
(1,651
)
116

Change in economic estimates related to reclamation and closure costs
1,803

—

Argentina reorganization
—

(16
)
Tax impact of purchase of SilverCrest common shares
426

(376
)
Other items
(495
)
(25
)
Adjusted attributable income tax (expense) recovery
(11,586
)
4,714

 
 
 
Adjusted attributable net income
$
36,625

$
4,369

 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding (000's)
123,052

120,351

 
 
 
Adjusted basic attributable income per share ($)
$
0.30

$
0.04

Non-GAAP financial measures - realized metal prices
We use the financial measure "average realized gold price" and "average realized silver price", which are non-GAAP financial measures, to supplement information in our consolidated financial statements. We use this information to evaluate our performance relative to average market prices of metals for the period. The presentation of average realized metal prices is not meant to be a substitute for revenue information presented in accordance with IFRS, but rather should be evaluated in conjunction with revenue information in our consolidated financial statements.

Average realized metal prices represent the sale price of the underlying metal before deducting treatment and refining charges and other quotational and pricing adjustments. Average realized prices are calculated as the revenue related to each of the metals sold, divided by the quantity of the respective units of metals sold. The quantity is the payable metal sold, inclusive of any adjustments upon final settlement.


SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  39





11.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Basis of preparation and accounting policies

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB and interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 provides details of the significant accounting policies for significant or potentially significant areas that have had an impact on our financial statements or may have an impact in future periods. The impact of future accounting changes is disclosed in note 2(q) to our consolidated financial statements.

Critical accounting estimates and judgments

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of judgments and/or estimates that
affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and related notes. Critical accounting estimates represent estimates that are uncertain and for which changes in those estimates could materially impact our consolidated financial statements. Areas of judgment and key sources of estimation uncertainty that have the most significant effect are disclosed in Note 3 of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.


12.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon the results of that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this MD&A, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the appropriate time periods and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management, with the participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:

•
pertain to maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, the transactions and dispositions of assets;
•
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS and that our receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our Board of Directors; and
•
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2019 which has not materially affected, or is reasonably not likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  40




Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2019, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who also audited our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, as stated in its report which accompanies our consolidated financial statements.
Limitations of Controls and Procedures
Our management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well conceived and operated can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, they cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our organization have been prevented or detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by unauthorized override of the control. The design of any control system also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

13.
CAUTIONARY NOTES REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This MD&A contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws and forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements.
Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “assumes,” “intends,” “strategy,” “goals,” “objectives,” “potential,” “believes,” or variations thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may,” “could,” “would,” “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms or similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this MD&A relate to, among other things: forecasts; outlook; guidance; future production of gold, silver and other metals; timing of production; future cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold, silver and other metals sold; the prices of gold, silver and other metals; our ability to discover new areas of mineralization, to add Mineral Reserves and to define additional Mineral Resources; the timing and extent of capital investment at our operations; the timing and extent of capitalized stripping at our operations; timing of production and production levels at the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations; achieving production records in 2020 at each of the Marigold mine and the Seabee Gold Operation; expected increase in access to higher grade ore at the Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation in 2020; expected increase in mining rates and mill throughput at the Seabee Gold Operation in 2020; expected capital, exploration and development expenditures; expected timing and benefits of the commissioning of the additional hydraulic loading unit at the Marigold mine in early 2020 and the construction of an additional leach pad at the Marigold mine in 2020; expected cost and timing of completion of the first and second phase of the expansion to tailings capacity at the Seabee Gold Operation in 2020 and 2021, respectively; upon completion of the Tailings Facility Expansion, expected tailings capacity for current mill throughput levels at the Seabee Gold Operation into the early 2030s; our expected drill programs at the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations; estimated mine life and extensions thereof, including anticipated extension of the mine life of the Marigold mine into the early 2030s, without requiring expansion of mining fleet or the associated expansion capital; timing of production at the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  41




Operations; timing, focus and results of our exploration and development programs; the investments made in the Marigold mine and the Seabee Gold Operation benefiting future periods; the expected high inflation rates in Argentina generally offsetting the benefits of the devaluation of the currency; current financial resources being sufficient to carry out plans, commitments and business requirements for the next twelve months; movements in gold prices not impacting the value of any financial instruments; estimated production rates for gold, silver and other metals produced by us; the estimated cost of sustaining capital; ongoing or future development plans and capital replacement; estimates of expected or anticipated economic returns from our mining projects, including future sales of metals, concentrate or other products produced by us and the timing thereof; and our plans and expectations for our properties and operations.
These forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied, including, without limitation, the following: uncertainty of production, development plans and cost estimates for the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation, Puna Operations and our projects; our ability to replace Mineral Reserves; commodity price fluctuations; political or economic instability and unexpected regulatory changes; currency fluctuations; the possibility of future losses; general economic conditions; counterparty and market risks related to the sale of our concentrate and metals; uncertainty in the accuracy of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates and in our ability to extract mineralization profitably; differences in U.S. and Canadian practices for reporting Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources; lack of suitable infrastructure or damage to existing infrastructure; future development risks, including start-up delays and cost overruns; our ability to obtain adequate financing for further exploration and development programs and opportunities; uncertainty in acquiring additional commercially mineable mineral rights; delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with our permits; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and management; the impact of governmental regulations, including health, safety and environmental regulations, including increased costs and restrictions on operations due to compliance with such regulations; unpredictable risks and hazards related to the development and operation of a mine or mineral property that are beyond our control; reclamation and closure requirements for our mineral properties; potential labour unrest, including labour actions by our unionized employees at Puna Operations; indigenous peoples' title claims and rights to consultation and accommodation may affect our existing operations as well as development projects and future acquisitions; certain transportation risks that could have a negative impact on our ability to operate; assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; recoverability of value added tax and significant delays in the collection process in Argentina; claims and legal proceedings, including adverse rulings in litigation against us and/or our directors or officers; compliance with anti-corruption laws and internal controls, and increased regulatory compliance costs; complying with emerging climate change regulations and the impact of climate change; fully realizing our interest in deferred consideration received in connection with recent divestitures; fully realizing the value of our shareholdings in our marketable securities, due to changes in price, liquidity or disposal cost of such marketable securities; uncertainties related to title to our mineral properties and the ability to obtain surface rights; the sufficiency of our insurance coverage; civil disobedience in the countries where our mineral properties are located; operational safety and security risks; actions required to be taken by us under human rights law; competition in the mining industry for mineral properties; our ability to complete and successfully integrate an announced acquisition; reputation loss resulting in decreased investor confidence, increased challenges in developing and maintaining community relations and an impediment to our overall ability to advance our projects; an event of default under our 2013 Notes or our 2019 Notes may significantly reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business; failure to meet covenants under our senior secured revolving credit facility; information systems security threats; conflicts of interest that could arise from certain of our directors' and officers' involvement with other natural resource companies; and those other various risks and uncertainties identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Information Form filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the SEC.
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements are based on what our management considers to be reasonable assumptions, beliefs, expectations and opinions based on the information currently available to it.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  42




Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, our ability to carry on our exploration and development activities, our ability to meet our obligations under our property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves on our mineral properties, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of our projects, the price of the minerals we produce, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, our ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner, our ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms, our ability to continue operating the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations, dilution and mining recovery assumptions, assumptions regarding stockpiles, the success of mining, processing, exploration and development activities, the accuracy of geological, mining and metallurgical estimates, no significant unanticipated operational or technical difficulties, maintaining good relations with the communities surrounding the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations, no significant events or changes relating to regulatory, environmental, health and safety matters, certain tax matters and no significant and continuing adverse changes in general economic conditions or conditions in the financial markets (including commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and inflation rates). You are cautioned that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all factors and assumptions which may have been used. We cannot assure you that actual events, performance or results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements, and management’s assumptions may prove to be incorrect. Our forward-looking statements reflect current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date hereof and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Qualified Persons
The scientific and technical information contained in this MD&A relating to the Marigold mine has been reviewed and approved by Greg Gibson, P.E., and James N. Carver, each of whom is a SME Registered Member and a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). Mr. Gibson is our General Manager and Mr. Carver is our Exploration Manager at the Marigold mine. The scientific and technical information contained in this MD&A relating to the Seabee Gold Operation has been reviewed and approved by Cameron Chapman, P.Eng., and Jeffrey Kulas, P. Geo., each of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101. Mr. Chapman is our General Manager and Mr. Kulas is our Manager Geology, Mining Operations at the Seabee Gold Operation. The scientific and technical information contained in this MD&A relating to Puna Operations has been reviewed and approved by Robert Gill, P.Eng. and F. Carl Edmunds, P. Geo., each of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101. Mr. Gill is our General Manager at Puna Operations and Mr. Edmunds is our Vice President Exploration.
Cautionary Note Regarding Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources Estimates
This MD&A includes Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources classification terms that comply with reporting standards in Canada and the Mineral Reserves and the Mineral Resources estimates are made in accordance with NI 43-101. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC set out in SEC Industry Guide 7. Consequently, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources information included in this MD&A is not comparable to similar information that would generally be disclosed by domestic U.S. reporting companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC. Under SEC standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.
In addition, the SEC’s disclosure standards normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “Measured Mineral Resources,” “Indicated Mineral Resources” or “Inferred Mineral Resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the SEC. U.S. investors should understand that “Inferred Mineral Resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. Moreover, the requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC, and reserves reported by us in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable with information made public by companies that report in accordance with U.S. standards.

SSR Mining Inc.
MD&A Year-End 2019 |  43




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-219848), S-8 (File No. 333-185498), S-8 (File No. 333-196116) and S-8 (File No.333-198092) of SSR Mining Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2020 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Exhibit 99.1 to SSR Mining Inc.’s Current Report on Form 6-K filed on February 20, 2020.


(Signed) "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP"


Chartered Professional Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
February 20, 2020





ssrmininglogonewa15.jpg
 
News Release 20-06




February 20, 2020
SSR MINING REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR-END 2019 RESULTS
VANCOUVER, B.C. - SSR Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: SSRM) (TSX: SSRM) (“SSR Mining”) reports consolidated financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2019.

Paul Benson, President and CEO said, “SSR Mining had another successful year in 2019 as we continued our track record of achieving production and cost guidance for the eighth consecutive year. We delivered reserve growth at Marigold and resource growth at Seabee, which continue to support mine life extensions at both assets.
Looking ahead, 2020 consolidated production is forecast to grow to approximately 425,000 gold equivalent ounces. With over $500 million of cash and an outlook of increasing production and higher margins at today’s precious metal prices, we are well positioned to continue our track record of creating value for our shareholders."

Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2019 Highlights:
(All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted)

▪
Achieved annual production and cost guidance: Achieved guidance for the eighth consecutive year by delivering gold equivalent production of 421,828 ounces at cash costs of $740 per payable gold equivalent ounce sold.(1) 

▪
Continued our track record of Mineral Reserves and Resources growth: Successful exploration activities in 2019 increased gold Mineral Reserves at the Marigold mine to 3.9 million ounces. At the Seabee Gold Operation, gold Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) increased to 1.1 million ounces and gold Inferred Mineral Resources increased to 583,000 ounces.

▪
Fourth consecutive year of positive earnings per share: Annual basic attributable income per share in 2019 was $0.47, an increase of 840% from 2018. Annual adjusted basic attributable income per share in 2019 was $0.81, a 252% increase from 2018.(1) 

▪
Delivered record annual gold production at Seabee: The operation achieved its sixth consecutive annual production record, producing 112,137 ounces of gold, exceeding the top end of our annual guidance. Annual cash costs were $464 per payable ounce of gold sold.(1)

▪
Strong operating performance at Marigold: Delivered gold production of 59,186 ounces for the fourth quarter of 2019, resulting in annual production of 220,227 ounces of gold, marking an annual production record and exceeding the top end of our annual guidance. Reported annual cash costs of $811 per payable ounce of gold sold. (1) 


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
PHONE         +1 604.689.3846
Suite 800 - 1055 Dunsmuir Street
www.ssrmining.com
TOLL FREE   +1 888.338.0046
PO Box 49088
 
 
Vancouver, BC, Canada V7X 1G4





▪
Successful ramp-up of Puna: Produced 7.7 million ounces of silver in 2019 at annual cash costs of $10.38 per payable ounce of silver sold.(1) Strong fourth quarter results with production of 2.1 million ounces of silver and cash costs of $8.90 per payable ounce of silver sold(1), demonstrating operational improvements made through the year.

▪
Acquired 8,900 hectares contiguous to the Marigold mine: Prospective land package on trend with several zones of gold mineralization.

▪
Consolidated 100% ownership in Puna Operations: Completed acquisition of the remaining 25% interest in Puna Operations leading to an immediate increase in silver production and improved operational flexibility.

▪
Maintained strong liquidity and balance sheet: Cash balance increased to $504 million and the value of marketable securities increased to $66 million.

▪
Completed $230 million convertible notes offering: Issued $230 million aggregate principal amount of 2.50% unsecured convertible senior notes on March 19, 2019. A portion of the proceeds was used to repurchase $150 million of our outstanding $265 million 2.875% convertible notes.

▪
Published inaugural Sustainability Report: Report outlines our approach to sustainability and underscores our commitment to transparency with our stakeholders.
(1)
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of cash costs per payable ounce of gold and silver sold and adjusted basic attributable income per share to manage and evaluate operating performance at the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 2





Marigold Mine, U.S.
 
 Three months ended
Total
Operating data
December 31, 2019

September 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

March 31, 2019

2019

2018

Total material mined (kt)
18,457

19,033

19,254

17,295

74,039

70,431

Waste removed (kt)
11,736

12,676

12,185

11,767

48,364

42,907

Total ore stacked (kt)
6,721

6,357

7,070

5,528

25,676

27,526

Gold stacked grade (g/t)
0.36

0.51

0.38

0.34

0.40

0.37

Gold recovery (%)
76.0

77.0

75.0

73.0

75.4

73.5

Strip ratio
1.7

2.0

1.7

2.1

1.9

1.6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mining cost ($/t mined)
1.83

1.73

1.65

1.73

1.74

1.76

Processing cost
($/t processed)
1.03

1.17

1.01

1.20

1.10

1.03

General and administrative costs ($/t processed)
0.54

0.54

0.47

0.54

0.51

0.45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold produced (oz)
59,186

52,968

54,922

53,151

220,227

205,161

Gold sold (oz)
61,088

50,650

59,702

55,517

226,957

198,884

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gold price ($/oz) (1)
1,478

1,481

1,309

1,303

1,391

1,261

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash costs ($/oz) (1)
778

822

835

812

811

723

AISC ($/oz) (1)
1,117

1,104

986

930

1,034

974

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial data ($000s)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
90,198

74,820

78,039

72,263

315,320

250,341

Income from mine operations
30,263

22,064

13,939

12,981

79,247

50,213

Capital expenditures (2)
17,768

10,496

6,924

3,167

38,355

52,935

Capitalized stripping
2,116

2,031

871

2,293

7,311

7,489

Exploration expenditures (3)
1,190

1,990

2,452

3,653

9,285

10,209


(1) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of realized gold price, cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at the Marigold mine. For further information, please refer to “Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
(2) 
Excludes capitalized exploration expenditures.
(3) 
Includes capitalized and expensed exploration expenditures.

Mine production

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Marigold mine produced 220,227 ounces of gold, an increase of 7% compared to the 205,161 ounces of gold produced for the year ended 2018. For the year ended 2019, gold sales were 226,957 ounces as 2019 began with 6,300 ounces in finished goods inventory.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, total material mined was 74.0 million tonnes, a 5% increase as compared to the year ended 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we mined 25.7 million ore tonnes, a 7% decrease from the previous year, offset by an 8% increase in gold stacked grade.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 3





During the fourth quarter of 2019, 18.5 million tonnes of material were mined, a decrease of 3% compared to the third quarter of 2019, due to a long shovel move and variance to planned haulage cycles. A new leach pad cell was commissioned on schedule with material stacking commencing in the fourth quarter.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we delivered approximately 6.7 million tonnes of ore to the heap leach pads at a gold grade of 0.36 g/t. This compares to 6.4 million tonnes of ore delivered to the heap leach pads at a gold grade of 0.51 g/t in the third quarter of 2019. Gold grade mined in the fourth quarter of 2019 was 29% lower than the prior quarter as primary ore deliveries from Mackay Phase 5 wound down and were replaced by lower grade material from Mackay Phase 4. The strip ratio declined to 1.7:1 in the fourth quarter of 2019, a decrease of 12% compared to the prior quarter.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Marigold mine produced 59,186 ounces of gold, a 12% increase compared to the prior quarter. The increase was due to higher-grade ore stacked during the third quarter of 2019, becoming available for production in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Mine operating costs

Cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold sold are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of gold sold were $811, an increase of 12% compared to the year ended 2018, primarily due to higher leach pad opening inventory unit costs. Total mining costs of $1.74 per tonne for the year ended December 31, 2019 were consistent with the prior year primarily due to 5% higher tonnes mined, offset partially by 4% higher total mining costs. Processing and general and administrative unit costs were higher for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year mainly due to 7% fewer ore tonnes mined. Total processing costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 were consistent with total processing costs for the year ended 2018, while general and administrative costs increased 7% primarily due to higher labor costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, AISC per payable ounce of gold sold was $1,034 compared to $974 for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the higher cash costs referred to above, offset partially by an increase in the number of ounces sold.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of gold sold were $778, a decrease of 5% compared to the previous quarter primarily due to lower leach pad opening inventory unit costs in the fourth quarter resulting from higher grades mined in the third quarter. Total mining costs of $1.83 per tonne in the fourth quarter of 2019 were 6% higher than the previous quarter due to 3% fewer tonnes mined and 3% higher total mining costs. Total mining costs were higher in the fourth quarter of 2019 mainly due to the timing of haul truck tire replacements. Processing unit costs were 12% lower in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the previous quarter mainly due to 6% higher ore tonnes mined and 7% lower total processing costs. Total processing costs were lower in the fourth quarter of 2019 mainly due to lower cyanide consumption and lower power unit rates. General and administrative unit costs in the fourth quarter of 2019 were consistent with the previous quarter as higher ore tonnes mined were offset by higher labor costs.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 4





In the fourth quarter of 2019, AISC per payable ounce of gold sold was $1,117 compared to $1,104 in the third quarter of 2019 due to higher planned sustaining capital expenditures, primarily related to the purchase of a PC7000 Komatsu shovel during the quarter for approximately $10.6 million.

Mine sales

Realized gold price is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 226,957 ounces of gold, a 14% increase compared to sales of 198,884 ounces of gold during the prior year. We realized an average gold price of $1,391 per ounce during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to an average realized gold price of $1,261 per ounce during the year ended December 31, 2018.
 
In the fourth quarter of 2019, we sold 61,088 ounces of gold, a 21% increase compared to sales of 50,650 ounces of gold in the third quarter of 2019. We realized an average gold price of $1,478 per ounce during the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to an average realized gold price of $1,481 per ounce during the third quarter of 2019.

Exploration

The main focus of the 2019 exploration program at Marigold was to convert Red Dot Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves. During previous quarters, we conducted exploration drilling for additional Mineral Resources along areas that were north and south of Red Dot, within the Mackay pit and on Valmy target areas such as Crossfire and East Basalt. During the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed a total of 64 reverse circulation ("RC") drill holes for 20,682 meters on these targets.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, our Red Dot exploration program focused on geotechnical drilling and engineering with the goal of declaring additional Mineral Reserves. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed the second phase of confirmation drilling, which included nine core holes for 3,700 meters. Based on the results of these evaluations, we converted Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves and Red Dot is anticipated to extend the Marigold mine life into the early 2030s, without requiring expansion of the haul fleet or the associated expansion capital.

Exploration at Marigold for the year ended December 31, 2019 was successful in replacing mined depletion and growing Mineral Reserves compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Including leach pad inventory, year-over-year Probable Mineral Reserves increased by 18%. At the same time, Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves and leach pad inventory) decreased by 11% due to depletion and model changes. Inferred Mineral Resources declined by 55% to 0.18 million gold ounces (16.2 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.35 g/t). Please see the section “Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” for more detail on our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed 20,825 meters of drilling in 64 RC drill holes at Trenton Canyon. RC drilling for the year amounted to 93,006 meters in 272 drill holes.

Following the exploration release of July 30, 2019, we received another 42 intercepts with grade-thickness products exceeding 20 gram-meters. These results, in addition to earlier published drill assays, contribute to the Mineral Resources reported for the Marigold mine.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 5





For 2020, we are planning 64,000 meters of RC and core drilling for resource growth at Trenton Canyon, Valmy, East Basalt, Mackay, and on two recently acquired small land parcels internal to Marigold's mineral claims package. This work includes diamond drilling to explore for higher-grade sulphide hosted gold deposits between East Basalt and Trenton Canyon.

Seabee Gold Operation, Canada
 
 Three months ended
Total
Operating data
December 31, 2019

September 30, 2019

June 30,
2019

March 31,
2019

2019

2018

Total ore milled (t)
87,394

77,465

88,424

90,756

344,039

351,999

Ore milled per day (t/day)
950

842

971

1,008

943

964

Gold mill feed grade (g/t)
7.89

12.39

9.83

8.59

9.56

9.16

Gold recovery (%)
97.9

98.8

98.4

97.2

98.2

97.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mining cost ($/t mined)
59

61

53

52

56

56

Processing cost ($/t processed)
29

28

35

28

30

25

General and administrative costs ($/t processed)
59

59

50

53

54

56

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gold produced (oz)
22,069

32,345

26,539

31,184

112,137

95,602

Gold sold (oz)
24,362

28,278

24,276

27,999

104,915

91,410

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gold price ($/oz) (1)
1,484

1,480

1,329

1,302

1,398

1,267

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash costs ($/oz) (1)
505

373

526

467

464

505

AISC ($/oz) (1)
751

715

828

947

812

755

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial data ($000s)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
36,142

41,331

32,237

36,431

146,141

115,655

Income from mine operations
13,735

22,134

11,762

13,672

61,303

30,783

Capital expenditures
2,772

5,406

3,358

8,772

20,308

7,054

Capitalized development
3,312

3,352

3,345

3,379

13,388

9,074

Exploration expenditures (2)
1,210

2,131

2,257

3,172

8,770

9,298


(1) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of realized gold price, cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at the Seabee Gold Operation. For further information, please refer to “Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
(2) 
Includes capitalized and expensed exploration expenditures.

Mine production

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Seabee Gold Operation produced 112,137 ounces of gold, an annual production record and a 17% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in gold production was mainly due to higher mill feed head grade, in addition to 1,244 ounces (on a gross basis) recovered from sludge, fines and cathodes during the third quarter of 2019.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 6





For the year ended December 31, 2019, the operation milled 344,039 tonnes of ore, a decrease of 2% from the 351,999 tonnes milled during the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the average gold mill feed grade was 9.56 g/t, a 4% increase compared to the prior year. The Santoy mine supplied 100% of ore milled, predominantly from long hole stopes.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, the operation produced 22,069 ounces of gold, a 32% decrease from the third quarter of 2019, mainly due to lower gold grades more than offsetting higher milling rates.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, the operation milled 87,394 tonnes of ore compared to 77,465 tonnes in the third quarter of 2019. The mill achieved an average throughput of 950 tonnes per day over the fourth quarter of 2019, a 13% increase compared to the previous quarter, mainly due to increased mill feed from the Santoy mine. During the fourth quarter of 2019, gold mill feed grade was 7.89 g/t, a 36% decrease compared to the third quarter of 2019, as a result of stope sequencing. Gold recovery for the fourth quarter of 2019 was 97.9%, consistent with the previous quarter.

Mine operating costs

Cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold sold are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of gold sold were $464, 8% lower than the $505 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is due primarily to a 15% increase in ounces sold in 2019 as a result of the higher gold mill feed grade, offset partially by higher processing costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, AISC per payable ounce of gold sold was $812, 8% higher than the $755 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is due to higher planned capital expenditures in 2019, related mainly to the Tailings Management Facility expansion, offset partially by the decrease in cash costs.

For the fourth quarter of 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of gold sold were $505, 35% higher than the $373 for the third quarter of 2019, due primarily to lower gold grade, 14% fewer ounces sold compared to the third quarter of 2019 and increases in total mining and general and administrative costs.

For the fourth quarter of 2019, AISC per payable ounce of gold sold was $751, compared to $715 in the third quarter of 2019 due to higher cash costs in conjunction with lower ounces sold in the fourth quarter of 2019, offset partially by lower sustaining capital expenditures.

Mine sales

Realized gold price is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 104,915 ounces of gold, a 15% increase compared to the 91,410 ounces of gold sold in during the prior year. We realized an average gold price of $1,398 per ounce during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to an average realized gold price of $1,267 per ounce during the year ended December 31, 2018.
 

 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 7





In the fourth quarter of 2019, we sold 24,362 ounces of gold, a decrease of 14% compared to the 28,278 ounces of gold sold in the third quarter of 2019. We realized an average gold price of $1,484 per ounce during the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to an average realized gold price of $1,480 per ounce during the third quarter of 2019.

Exploration

In 2019, exploration at Seabee focused on increasing and upgrading Mineral Resources near the Santoy mine through 68,000 meters of drilling from surface and underground. Specific targets included Santoy 8A and Santoy Gap and the recently discovered Inferred Mineral Resources at Gap HW.  

For the year ended December 31, 2019, Mineral Reserves decreased by 18%, due to mining depletion; however, the average gold grade is 11% higher compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) increased by 23% at an average gold grade of 10.61 g/t as a result of our exploration focus at Gap HW. As of December 31, 2019, Inferred Mineral Resources are 583,000 ounces (2.13 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 8.50 g/t), 21% higher compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, due to conversion and continued exploration activity at Gap HW. Gap HW is now a significant discovery for the Seabee Gold Operation and remains open on strike and at depth. Please see the section “Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” for more detail on our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, Seabee Gold Operation completed 12,738 meters of underground drilling for a total of 68,158 meters for the year ended December 31, 2019 to convert and extend portions of Santoy 8A, Santoy Gap and Gap HW deposits. The majority of the drilled meters were targeting Gap HW.

For 2020, we are planning to drill 50,000 meters in the area of the Santoy mine and Gap HW as brownfield work, with another 37,000 meters of drilling on greenfield targets on tenures controlled by us. Additionally, we are planning 12,000 meters of greenfield drilling on the Fisher property.



 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 8





Puna Operations, Argentina
(amounts presented on a 100% basis)
 
 Three months ended
Total
Operating data
December 31, 2019

September 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

March 31, 2019

2019

2018

Total material mined (kt) (1)
3,244

3,116

3,304

2,618

12,282

897

Waste removed (kt) (1)
2,725

2,531

3,114

2,469

10,839

696

Strip ratio (1)
5.3

4.3

16.4

16.6

7.5

3.5

Ore milled (kt)
400

336

313

345

1,394

1,420

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Silver mill feed grade (g/t)
174

165

160

235

184

114

Lead mill feed grade (%)
0.99

0.81

0.71

1.07

0.89

0.92

Zinc mill feed grade (%)
0.63

0.60

0.46

0.46

0.54

0.84

Silver recovery (%)
95.1

93.5

92.4

91.7

93.2

72.1

Lead recovery (%)
91.9

88.1

79.4

83.6

85.8

83.1

Zinc recovery (%)
54.3

49.3

48.1

47.3

49.2

39.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mining cost ($/t mined) (1)
2.62

2.76

2.33

2.74

2.60

2.61

Processing cost ($/t milled)
29.53

36.34

32.57

29.62

32.04

18.72

General and administrative costs ($/t milled)
9.11

9.24

8.27

8.02

8.68

7.34

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Silver produced ('000 oz)
2,132

1,664

1,486

2,392

7,674

3,747

Silver sold ('000 oz)
2,584

1,505

2,679

927

7,695

3,761

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lead produced ('000 lb) (2)
7,985

5,304

3,879

6,789

23,957

3,107

Lead sold ('000 lb) (2)
9,371

4,119

7,652

2,977

24,119

1,059

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Zinc produced ('000 lb) (3)
3,007

2,206

1,539

1,640

8,392

8,775

Zinc sold ('000 lb) (3)
3,067

2,030

5,757

3,218

14,072

2,365

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized silver price ($/oz) (4)
17.32

17.31

14.92

15.35

16.26

15.92

Realized lead price ($/lb) (4)
0.92

0.94

0.85

0.95

0.90

0.89

Realized zinc price ($/lb) (4)
1.11

1.03

1.28

1.27

1.20

1.21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash costs ($/oz) (4)
8.90

14.22

9.80

9.94

10.38

15.91

AISC ($/oz) (4)
11.18

17.36

13.08

19.76

14.06

19.33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Data ($000s)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
51,263

31,697

44,873

17,556

145,389

54,679

Income (loss) from mine operations
14,915

7,708

4,126

3,584

30,333

(4,151
)
Capitalized expenditures (5)
2,134

1,782

1,157

1,543

6,616

9,680

Capitalized stripping
2,565

1,385

6,273

6,191

16,414

—

Exploration expenditures
492

229

65

1

787

462


(1) 
Data for 2018 is for the period subsequent to December 1, 2018, the date upon which commercial production was declared at the Chinchillas mine.
(2) 
Data for lead production and sales relate only to lead in lead concentrate.
(3) 
Data for zinc production and sales relate only to zinc in zinc concentrate.
(4) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measures of realized silver, lead and zinc prices, cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of silver sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at Puna Operations. For further information, please refer to “Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
(5) 
Does not include exploration or development of the Chinchillas project or capitalized stripping.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 9





Mine production

For the year ended December 31, 2019, Puna Operations produced a total of 7.7 million ounces of silver, 24.0 million pounds of lead and 8.4 million pounds of zinc. After declaring commercial production at the Chinchillas mine in December 2018, 2019 represented the first full year of Puna Operations milling Chinchillas open pit ore. During the year ended December 31, 2019, ore was milled at an average of 3,819 tonnes per day and contained an average silver grade of 184 g/t. The average silver recovery was 93.2%, a 29% improvement as compared to 2018 when the operation milled primarily low-grade stockpiled ore.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, silver production was 2.1 million ounces, an increase of 28% compared to the third quarter of 2019, due mainly to increased mill throughput and processing of higher-grade ore. During the fourth quarter of 2019, ore was milled at an average of 4,349 tonnes per day. Processed ore in the fourth quarter of 2019 contained an average silver grade of 174 g/t, a 5% increase compared to the third quarter of 2019. The average silver recovery in the fourth quarter of 2019 was 95.1% as mill performance continues to benefit from our Operational Excellence initiatives.

Mine operating costs

Cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of silver sold are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of silver sold were $10.38, a decrease of 35% compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is mainly due to increased production as the Chinchillas mine achieved steady state operations, driven by higher silver mill feed grades and recoveries, partially offset by higher unit processing costs, driven by a re-start of the zinc circuit in 2019, the pumping of tailings for in-pit disposal at the Pirquitas plant and higher ore haulage costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, AISC per payable ounce of silver sold was $14.06, a decrease of 27% compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is mainly due to lower cash costs per payable ounce of silver sold, offset partially by higher capital expenditures, including capital stripping costs, of which the majority were incurred in the first half of 2019.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, cash costs per payable ounce of silver sold were $8.90, a decrease of 37% compared to the third quarter of 2019. The decrease is mainly due to lower per unit operating costs as a result of higher mill throughput and higher by-product credits during the fourth quarter of 2019, driven by higher production resulting from an increase in mill throughput, feed grades, and recoveries.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, AISC per payable ounce of silver sold was $11.18, a decrease of 36% compared to the third quarter of 2019. The decrease is mainly due to lower cash costs per payable ounce of silver sold, offset partially by higher capital expenditures, including capitalized stripping costs during the fourth quarter of 2019.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 10





Mine sales

Realized silver price is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".

For the year ended December 31, 2019, silver sales totaled 7.7 million ounces, an increase of 105% compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Lead sales totaled 24.1 million pounds and zinc sales totaled 14.1 million pounds. The increase in concentrate sales is mainly due to an increase in production, as 2019 represented the first full year of production at the Chinchillas mine. For the year ended December 31, 2019, realized silver price was $16.26 per ounce, an increase of 2% compared to the previous year.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, silver sales totaled 2.6 million ounces, an increase of 72% compared to the third quarter of 2019. Lead and zinc sales totaled 9.4 million pounds and 3.1 million pounds, respectively, representing increases of 128% and 51%, respectively, compared to the previous quarter. The increase in concentrate sales is mainly due to higher production in the fourth quarter of 2019, driven by higher throughput, feed grades, and recoveries, as well as the timing of concentrate sales.

Exploration

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed 2,074 meters of diamond drilling exploring the Granada target. The Granada target is the projected intersection of the north-dipping past producing historic Potosi vein and the south-dipping Cortaderas Breccia vein which hosts much of the current underground Mineral Resources at Pirquitas. We anticipate completing the drilling in 2020 and reporting these results in the first half of 2020.

Chinchillas Project, Argentina

The Chinchillas project was completed in the fourth quarter of 2019 with all project components handed over to operations. The project was completed for an investment of $75 million, approximately $6 million below approved budget.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 11





Outlook

This section of the news release provides management's production, cost, capital, exploration and development expenditure estimates for 2020. These are “forward-looking statements” and subject to the cautionary note regarding the risks associated with forward-looking statements contained in this news release. Cash costs per payable ounce of gold and silver sold are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
For the full year 2020, we expect:
Operating Guidance
 
Marigold mine

Seabee Gold Operation

Puna Operations

Gold Production
oz
225,000 - 240,000

110,000 - 120,000

—

Silver Production
Moz
—

—

6.0 - 7.0

Lead Production
Mlb
—

—

21.0 - 24.0

Zinc Production
Mlb
—

—

7.0 - 9.0

Cash Costs per Payable Ounce Sold (1)
$/oz
780 - 810

460 - 500

10.50 - 12.00

Capital Expenditures
 
 
 
 
   Sustaining
$M
60

15

15

   Growth
$M
—

5

6

Capitalized Stripping / Capitalized Development
$M
20

12

12

Exploration Expenditures
 
 
 
 
   Sustaining
$M
4

1

—

   Growth
$M
8

11

1


(1) 
We report the non-GAAP financial measure of cash costs per payable ounce of gold and silver sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at our operations. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.

In 2020, we expect to produce on a consolidated basis, at the midpoint of guidance, approximately 425,000 gold equivalent ounces at gold equivalent cash costs of $740 per payable ounce sold.

At the Marigold mine, gold production is expected to increase in 2020 compared to 2019. Marigold is well-positioned for another record production year as the mine benefits from an additional hydraulic loading unit purchased in 2019, expected to be commissioned in the first quarter of 2020, and continued operational efficiencies. Production is weighted toward the second half of the year as a result of mine sequencing and access to higher grade ore. Capital investments are expected to total $60 million, including $12 million for two replacement haul trucks and $15 million for an additional leach pad to be built in 2020. The continuous build of leach pad capacity will ensure the operation can maintain leach cycle times and gold recoveries at higher ore stacking rates. Capitalized stripping is expected to total $20 million with the majority incurred through the first three quarters of the year. Exploration expenditures totaling $12 million are expected to focus on drill programs at Mackay, Basalt, Valmy and Trenton Canyon with the goals of adding Mineral Reserves and defining additional Mineral Resources within these areas. Exploration expenditures include $2 million for drill testing Trenton Canyon’s sulphide targets.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 12





At the Seabee Gold Operation, we expect to deliver another record gold production year in 2020 as we continue executing our plan of increasing mining rates to support higher sustained mill throughput. Production is weighted to the first half of the year due to access to higher grade ore. Cash costs are expected to remain low between $460 and $500 per payable ounce of gold sold. Sustaining capital investments remain focused on mining equipment and ventilation, with $5 million planned for underground and surface equipment to enable higher mine production. Due to continued exploration success at Seabee, in 2019 we commenced an expansion of tailings storage capacity at the mine. In 2020, investment in the tailings facility expansion is estimated to total $12 million as phase 1 of the project is completed and phase 2 is initiated, with completion expected in 2021. Once completed, Seabee is expected to have tailings capacity for current mill throughput levels into the early 2030s. Non-tailings facility-related capital expenditures are concentrated in the first quarter of 2020 as equipment is delivered over the ice road. Expected capitalized development expenditures of $12 million support higher mining rates and reflect the development strategy for the Santoy complex. Exploration expenditures at Seabee are estimated to total $12 million with a focus on expansion and definition of Santoy Gap Hanging Wall ("Gap HW") and surface drill programs at the Seabee and Fisher properties following up on targets identified in 2019.

At Puna Operations, we expect to produce between 6.0 and 7.0 million ounces of silver at cash costs, net of by-products, of between $10.50 and $12.00 per payable silver ounce sold. Production is weighted to the first half of the year due to higher grades, with the majority of capital stripping expected in the second half of the year. Sustaining capital investments of $15 million relate principally to maintenance of mine, mill and power generating equipment. A $6 million investment to replace contracted ore transportation is also planned as the operation focuses on lowering unit operating costs.

At the Pitarrilla project, located in Mexico, we plan to spend $4 million in 2020 as part of a two-year $10 million exploration program related to extending an existing decline to provide drill access to the underground Mineral Resources. An improved geological model from work completed in 2019 indicates strong potential to better define known, high-grade mineralized veining associated with steeply dipping rhyolite dyke contacts. Extending the underground ramp provides access for tighter spaced drilling at better orientations to test the rhyolite dykes and veins for continuity. If infill drilling confirms the continuity of high-grade mineralized structures, there would be potential to enhance the grades of existing Mineral Resources.

At the San Luis project, located in Peru, we expect to commence a detailed mapping program in the area of the existing high-grade gold-silver Mineral Resources in 2020.

Our 2.875% senior convertible notes issued in 2013 (the "2013 Notes"), of which approximately $115 million remain outstanding, provide for investors to put the notes to us at their option (the "Put Option") for repurchase at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, on February 1, 2020.

On January 31, 2020, we announced that as of the expiration of the Put Option, $49,000 aggregate principal amount of the 2013 Notes were validly surrendered for purchase. The remaining outstanding 2013 Notes are callable by us at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, at any time at our election giving due notice, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Indenture governing the 2013 Notes (the "Indenture"). On February 13, 2020, we provided notice of redemption to call the remaining outstanding 2013 Notes. We will redeem all of our outstanding 2013 Notes on March 30, 2020 totaling an aggregate principal amount of $114,947,000 at a

 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 13





redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, unless any of the outstanding 2013 Notes are converted into common shares of the Company in accordance with the terms of the 2013 Notes. Following the redemption of the 2013 Notes, no 2013 Notes will remain outstanding.

Gold equivalent figures for our 2020 operating guidance are based on a gold-to-silver ratio of 86:1. Cash costs and capital expenditures guidance is based on an oil price of $60 per barrel and an exchange rate of 1.30 Canadian dollars to one U.S. dollar. Royalty costs at Marigold were calculated using a gold price of $1,550 per ounce.

Consolidated Financial Summary
(presented in thousands of U.S., dollars, except for per share value)
 
 
 
 
 
Selected Financial Data (1)
Three Months
Ended December 31
Year
Ended December 31
 
2019

2018

2019

2018

 
$

$

$

$

Revenue
177,603

103,712

606,850

420,675

Income from mine operations (1)
58,913

16,536

170,883

76,845

Gross margin (%) (2)
33

16

28

18

Operating income (1)
43,228

3,061

122,338

29,895

Net income (loss)
19,479

(2,544
)
55,757

(31
)
Net income (loss) attributable to equity holders of SSR Mining
19,479

(3,486
)
57,315

6,379

Basic attributable income (loss) per share
0.16

(0.03
)
0.47

0.05

Adjusted attributable income before tax (1)
48,211

(345
)
129,419

28,586

Adjusted attributable net income (1)
36,625

4,369

98,215

27,961

Adjusted basic attributable income per share (1)
0.30

0.04

0.81

0.23

Cash generated by (used in) operating activities
48,632

(3,744
)
134,198

59,769

Cash used in investing activities
(22,303
)
(63,027
)
(130,328
)
(115,930
)
Cash generated by financing activities
(251
)
11,903

80,553

20,516

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Position
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Cash and cash equivalents
503,647
 
419,212
 
Marketable securities
66,453
 
29,542
 
Current assets
899,662
 
733,119
 
Current liabilities
234,171
 
83,254
 
Working capital (3)
665,491
 
649,865
 
Total assets
1,750,107
 
1,521,138
 

(1) 
We report non-GAAP financial measures including adjusted attributable income before tax, adjusted attributable net income, and adjusted basic attributable income per share to manage and evaluate our operating performance. For further information, please refer to “Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
(2) 
Gross margin is defined as income from mine operations divided by revenue.
(3) 
Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 14





Quarterly financial summary

Realized gold and silver prices are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".

Revenue increased by 71% in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the fourth quarter of 2018, mainly due to an 18% increase in gold ounces sold and a 20% increase in realized gold price at our Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, as well as a 177% increase in silver ounces sold and a 20% increase in realized silver price at our Puna Operations.
Income from mine operations of $58.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2019 generated a gross margin of 33% compared to a gross margin of 16% in the fourth quarter of 2018. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2018, income from mine operations generated at all of our operations were higher mainly due to higher average realized prices of gold and silver and higher gold and silver ounces sold. Net income for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $19.5 million, compared to a net loss of $2.5 million in the same quarter of 2018.

Cash generated from operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2019 increased to $48.6 million compared to $3.7 million used in operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2018. All mine operations generated higher margins driven primarily by higher realized gold and silver prices.

Investing activities used $22.3 million of cash in the fourth quarter of 2019. This included expenditures of $18.9 million on plant and equipment, capitalized stripping costs of $3.7 million and underground development costs of $3.3 million, offset partially by $2.2 million of interest received. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we invested $10.6 million in mineral properties, plant and equipment, $18.9 million on the Chinchillas project and $23.1 million on the purchase of marketable securities.

Cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to cash generated of $11.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Annual financial summary

Realized gold and silver prices are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion under "Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures".

Revenue for the year ended 2019 increased by 44% compared to the year ended 2018 mainly due to a 14% increase in gold ounces sold and a 10% increase in realized gold price at our Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation, as well as a 105% increase in silver ounces sold and a 2% increase in realized silver price at our Puna Operations.

Income from mine operations for the year ended 2019 of $170.9 million generated a gross margin of 28% compared to a gross margin of 18% for the year ended 2018, primarily due to higher ounces of gold and silver sold and higher average realized prices of gold and silver. Net income for the year ended 2019 was $55.8 million, compared to net loss of $0.0 million for the comparative period 2018.

Cash generated by operating activities for the year ended 2019 increased to $134.2 million compared to $59.8 million for the year ended 2018. The increase is mainly due to higher ounces sold and higher average realized prices of gold and silver.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 15





Investing activities used $130.3 million for the year ended 2019 compared to using $115.9 million for the year ended 2018. In 2019, we invested $55.9 million in plant and equipment, $22.6 million to acquire Trenton Canyon and Buffalo Valley, $23.2 million in capitalized stripping costs, $13.4 million in underground development costs and $11.6 million in the Chinchillas project. We also received $9.7 million of interest. In 2018, we invested $67.7 million in plant and equipment, $60.2 million on the Chinchillas project and $23.1 million in marketable securities, which was partially offset by $63.4 million received from the sale of marketable securities.

Cash generated by financing activities for the year ended 2019 increased to $80.6 million compared to $20.5 million for the year ended 2018. In 2019, we repurchased a portion of our 2013 Notes for $152.3 million and issued the 2019 Notes for net proceeds of $222.9 million. In addition, we received proceeds from stock option exercises of $7.2 million and funding, prior to the acquisition of the non-controlling interest, from our joint venture partner at Puna Operations of $3.7 million. In 2018, we received funding from our joint venture partner for $15.2 million at Puna Operations, as well as proceeds on the exercise of stock options of $5.3 million.

Corporate Summary

SSR Mining has an experienced management team of mine-builders and operators with proven capabilities. We have a strong balance sheet with $503.6 million in cash and cash equivalents as at December 31, 2019. We are committed to delivering safe production through relentless emphasis on Operational Excellence. We are also focused on growing production and Mineral Reserves through the exploration and acquisition of assets for accretive growth, while maintaining financial strength.

On March 19, 2019, we issued $230.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.50% unsecured convertible senior notes (the "2019 Notes") for net proceeds of $222.9 million after payment of commissions and expenses related to the offering. For a full description of the 2019 Notes, see the “Capital Resources” discussion in Section 6 of our MD&A.

Of the proceeds from the 2019 Notes, $152.3 million was used to repurchase, in separate privately negotiated transactions, $150 million of our outstanding 2013 Notes.

On June 27, 2019, we acquired approximately 8,900 hectares of land contiguous to the Marigold mine, comprised of a 100% interest in the Trenton Canyon and Buffalo Valley properties (the "Properties") from Newmont Corporation and Fairmile Gold Mining, Inc., net of a 0.5% net smelter returns royalty on the Properties. The aggregate purchase price included $22 million in cash and the assumption of related long-term environmental and reclamation obligations then valued at approximately $13 million. The acquisition of the Properties increases Marigold's land position by 84%, provides a potential opportunity to increase mineralization and adds multiple zones of mineralization as potential exploration targets.

In August 2019, we completed the purchase of common shares of SilverCrest Metals Inc. ("SilverCrest") pursuant to our equity participation right. Upon closing of the transaction, we owned approximately 9.8% of the issued and outstanding common shares of SilverCrest on a non-diluted basis. As at December 31, 2019, we owned approximately 8.4% of the issued and outstanding common shares of SilverCrest on a non-diluted basis.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 16





On September 18, 2019, we closed the acquisition of the remaining 25% interest in Puna Operations Inc. from Golden Arrow Resources Corporation ("Golden Arrow") for aggregate consideration totaling approximately $32.4 million (the "Transaction"). The Transaction allowed us to consolidate ownership in Puna Operations, streamlined our reporting structure and is expected to allow for cost savings and operational flexibility. The Transaction also provides us with near-term low-risk silver production growth. Under the terms of the Transaction, aggregate consideration consisted of $2.3 million in cash, $11.4 million for the cancellation of the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the non-revolving term loan to Golden Arrow, $18.2 million in common shares of SSR Mining, and $0.5 million for the transfer to Golden Arrow of 4,285,714 of their common shares held by us.

Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

At December 31, 2019, our total estimated gold Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves were 4.4 million ounces including Marigold leach pad inventory (230.3 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.56 g/t excluding Marigold leach pad inventory) and total estimated silver Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves were 49.7 million ounces (10.4 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 149 g/t) compared to 3.9 million ounces including Marigold leach pad inventory (203.6 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.56 g/t excluding Marigold leach pad inventory) and 38.7 million ounces (7.74 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 156 g/t), respectively, at December 31, 2018. Mineral Reserves estimates for the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations have been determined based on prices of $1,250 per ounce of gold and $18.00 per ounce of silver. These prices are unchanged from those used to determine the Mineral Reserves estimate at December 31, 2018.

At the Marigold mine, our 2019 exploration program led to an increase in Mineral Reserves. Probable Mineral Reserves increased to 3.9 million ounces of gold (228.8 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.49 g/t) at the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of 18% compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. After consideration of mining depletion in 2019 of 330,000 ounces, 912,000 ounces (51.9 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.55 g/t) of Probable Mineral Reserves were added in 2019. The increase in Probable Mineral Reserves is mainly attributable to our successful infill and exploration drilling programs which converted Mineral Resources at Phases 2 and 3 of Red Dot and Mackay. We added 874,000 ounces (53.0 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.51 g/t) of gold Probable Mineral Reserves at Red Dot in Phases 2 and 3. Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) totaled 4.9 million ounces of gold (301.8 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.48 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 5.6 million ounces (354.5 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.47 g/t) at December 31, 2018. The reduction is principally due to depletion and revised slope angles. Inferred Mineral Resources declined to 182,000 ounces of gold (16.2 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.35 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 404,000 ounces of gold (33.6 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 0.37 g/t) at December 31, 2018, due to conversion in certain areas at Mackay and Red Dot. Both the 3.9 million ounce Probable Mineral Reserve and the 4.9 million ounce Indicated Mineral Resource (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) are inclusive of the respective year's leach pad inventory. For further information regarding our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimate at Marigold, please see the technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Marigold mine, Humboldt County, Nevada, U.S.A" dated July 31, 2018.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 17





At the Seabee Gold Operation, Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves total 500,000 ounces of gold at December 31, 2019, compared to 608,000 ounces at December 31, 2018. Proven Mineral Reserves were 117,000 ounces (0.37 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 9.82 g/t) and Probable Mineral Reserves were 383,000 ounces (1.16 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 10.29 g/t). The decrease in Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves was primarily due to depletion. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) total 1,050,000 gold ounces (3.08 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 10.61 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 856,000 ounces (2.29 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 11.60 g/t) at December 31, 2018. This 23% addition of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources principally reflects conversion and additions at Gap HW. Measured Mineral Resources are 201,000 ounces (0.49 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 12.69 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 170,000 ounces (0.45 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 11.76 g/t) at December 31, 2018 and Indicated Mineral Resources are 849,000 ounces (2.59 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 10.22 g/t) at December 31, 2019, compared to 686,000 ounces (1.85 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 11.56 g/t) at December 31, 2018.

As at December 31, 2019, Inferred Mineral Resources totaled 583,000 gold ounces (2.13 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 8.50 g/t) compared to 483,000 ounces (1.70 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 8.82 g/t) at December 31, 2018, with the majority of the increase resulting from discovery at Gap HW more than offsetting the conversion at Gap HW to Indicated Mineral Resources. The Gap HW discovery now totals 279,000 ounces (1.15 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 7.52 g/t) classified as Indicated Mineral Resources and an additional 217,000 ounces (0.85 million tonnes at an average gold grade of 7.94 g/t) classified as Inferred Mineral Resources. For further information regarding our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimate at the Seabee Gold Operation, please see the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Seabee Gold Operation, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated October 20, 2017.

At Puna Operations, silver Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves are 49.7 million ounces at December 31, 2019 compared to 38.7 million ounces at December 31, 2018. The increase in reported Mineral Reserves results from our purchase of the remaining 25% interest in Puna Operations, which more than offset depletion and modelling adjustments. Proven Mineral Reserves are 3.8 million ounces (0.81 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 147 g/t) at December 31, 2019 compared to 4.4 million ounces (0.71 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 196 g/t) at December 31, 2018 and Probable Mineral Reserves are 45.9 million ounces (9.6 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 149 g/t) compared to 34.3 million ounces (7.03 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 152 g/t) at December 31, 2018. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves) total 110.7 million ounces of silver within the open pit, underground and stockpiles at both Chinchillas and Pirquitas at December 31, 2019 compared to 89.0 million ounces at December 31, 2018. Measured Mineral Resources were 6.2 million ounces (1.51 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 127 g/t) at December 31, 2019 and Indicated Mineral Resources were 104.5 million ounces (27.4 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 119 g/t). Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated to total 42.7 million ounces (23.2 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 57 g/t) of silver at December 31, 2019, compared to 31.1 million ounces (16.8 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 58 g/t) of silver at December 31, 2018.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 18





Details on Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources by mine and project including tonnes, grades, ounces and notes, are presented below.

Mineral Reserves and Resources
(As of December 31, 2019)
 
 
Tonnes
Gold
Silver
Lead
Zinc
Gold
Silver
Lead
Zinc
Gold-Equivalent
 
Location
kt
g/t
g/t
%
%
koz
koz
M-lbs
M-lbs
koz
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MINERAL RESERVES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proven Mineral Reserves
 
 
Seabee (2) (UG)
Canada
370

9.82

—

—

—

117

—

—

—

117

Chinchillas (3,4)
Argentina
807

—

146.9

0.56

0.30

—

3,809

10

5

66

Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
117

3,809

10

5

183

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Probable Mineral Reserves
 
 
Marigold (1)
U.S.
228,763

0.49

—

—

—

3,610

—

—

—

3,610

Marigold Leach Pad Inventory (1)
U.S.
 
 
 
 
 
277

 
 
 
277

Seabee (2) (UG)
Canada
1,158

10.29

—

—

—

383

—

—

—

383

Chinchillas (3,4)
Argentina
8,113

—

160.8

1.36

0.37

—

41,944

243

66

832

Chinchillas Stockpiles (3)
Argentina
587

—

114.8

0.57

0.66

—

2,167

7

9

43

Pirquitas Stockpiles (3)
Argentina
870

—

63.9

—

1.43

—

1,789

—

28

48

Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,270

45,901

251

102

5,193

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
 
 
Marigold (1)
U.S.
228,763

0.49

—

—

—

3,610

—

—

—

3,610

Marigold Leach Pad Inventory (1)
U.S.
 
 
 
 
 
277

 
 
 
277

Seabee (2) (UG)
Canada
1,528

10.17

—

—

—

500

—

—

—

500

Chinchillas (3,4)
Argentina
10,377

—

149.0

1.14

0.47

—

49,710

260

108

989

Total Proven and Probable
 
 
 
 
4,387

49,710

260

108

5,376

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 19





 
 
Tonnes
Gold
Silver
Lead
Zinc
Gold
Silver
Lead
Zinc
Gold-Equivalent
 
Location
kt
g/t
g/t
%
%
koz
koz
M-lbs
M-lbs
koz
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MINERAL RESOURCES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Measured Mineral Resource (inclusive of Proven Mineral Reserves)
 
 
Seabee (2) (UG)
Canada
493

12.69

—

—

—

201

—

—

—

201

Chinchillas (3,4)
Argentina
1,512

—

126.8

0.54

0.37

—

6,165

18

12

114

Pitarrilla (6)
Mexico
12,345

—

90.1

0.70

1.22

—

35,746

190

333

969

Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
201

41,911

208

346

1,284

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Probable Mineral Reserves)
 
 
Marigold (1)
U.S.
301,760

0.48

—

—

—

4,665

—

—

—

4,665

Marigold Leach Pad Inventory (1)
U.S.
 
 
 
 
 
277

 
 
 
277

Seabee (2) (UG)
Canada
2,586

10.22

—

—

—

849

—

—

—

849

Amisk (9)
Canada
30,150

0.85

6.2

—

—

827

5,978

—

—

912

Chinchillas (3,4)
Argentina
23,266

—

101.4

0.98

0.63

—

75,815

502

321

1,776

Chinchillas Stockpile (3)
Argentina
587

—

114.8

0.57

0.66

—

2,167

7

9

45

Pirquitas
Stockpile (3)
Argentina
870

—

63.9

—

1.43

—

1,789

—

28

51

Pirquitas (3,5) (UG)
Argentina
2,634

—

292.4

—

4.46

—

24,756

—

259

594

Pitarrilla (6)
Mexico
147,016

—

97.5

0.32

0.87

—

460,728

1,040

2,804

10,003

Pitarrilla (7) (UG)
Mexico
5,430

—

164.9

0.68

1.34

—

28,793

81

160

624

San Luis (8) (UG)
Peru
484

22.40

578.1

—

—

349

9,003

—

—

477

Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
6,967

609,030

1,631

3,580

20,273

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of Mineral Reserves)
 
 
Marigold (1)
U.S.
301,760

0.48

—

—

—

4,665

—

—

—

4,665

Marigold Leach Pad Inventory (1)
U.S.
 
 
 
 
 
277

 
 
 
277

Seabee (2) (UG)
Canada
3,079

10.61

—

—

—

1,050

—

—

—

1,050

Amisk (9)
Canada
30,150

0.85

6.2

—

—

827

5,978

—

—

912

Chinchillas (3,4) + Pirquitas (3,5)
Argentina
28,870

—

119.3

0.83

0.99

—

110,692

528

628

2,579

Pitarrilla (6,7) (OP + UG)
Mexico
164,791

—

99.1

0.36

0.91

—

525,267

1,312

3,297

11,596

San Luis (8) (UG)
Peru
484

22.40

578.1

—

—

349

9,003

—

—

477

Total Measured and Indicated
 
 
 
7,168

650,941

1,839

3,925

21,557

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inferred Mineral Resources
 
 
Marigold (1)
U.S.
16,194

0.35

—

—

—

182

—

—

—

182

Seabee (2) (UG)
Canada
2,132

8.50

—

—

—

583

—

—

—

583

Amisk (9)
Canada
28,653

0.64

4.0

—

—

589

3,693

—

—

642

Chinchillas (3,4)
Argentina
22,172

—

49.9

0.55

0.83

—

35,558

268

407

1,096

Pirquitas (3,5) (UG)
Argentina
1,080

—

206.9

—

7.45

—

7,185

—

177

267

Pitarrilla (6)
Mexico
8,524

—

77.4

0.18

0.58

—

21,213

33

108

429

Pitarrilla (7) (UG)
Mexico
1,230

—

138.1

0.89

1.25

—

5,461

24

34

128

San Luis (8) (UG)
Peru
20

5.60

272.0

—

—

4

175

—

—

6

Total Inferred
 
 
 
 
1,358

73,286

325

726

3,334



 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 20





Notes to Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources Table
All estimates set forth in the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources table have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). The Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates have been reviewed and approved by Samuel Mah, P.Eng., our Director, Mine Planning, and F. Carl Edmunds, P.Geo., our Vice President, Exploration, each of whom is a qualified person as defined under NI 43-101.
All Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Due to the uncertainty that may be attached to Inferred Mineral Resources, it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be upgraded to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource as a result of continued exploration.
Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources figures have some rounding applied, and thus totals may not sum exactly. All ounces reported herein represent troy ounces, and “g/t” represents grams per tonne. All $ references are in U.S. dollars. All Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates are as at December 31, 2019.
Mineral Reserves are estimated using the following commodity prices: $1,250 per ounce of gold; $18.00 per ounce of silver; $1.00 per pound of zinc; and $0.90 per pound of lead. Additional modifying parameters such as mine recovery, dilution, metallurgical recovery and geotechnical are appropriately taken into consideration. Mineral Resources are estimated using the following commodity prices: $1,400 per ounce of gold; $20.00 per ounce of silver; $1.30 per pound of zinc; and $1.10 per pound of lead, except as noted below for each of the San Luis project and the Amisk project.
All technical reports for the properties are available under our profile on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com or on our website at www.ssrmining.com.
Marigold Mine
(1) 
Except for updates to cost parameters, all other key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources and the data verification procedures followed are set out in the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Marigold Mine, Humboldt County, Nevada” dated July 31, 2018 (the "Marigold Technical Report"). For additional information about the Marigold mine, readers are encouraged to review the Marigold Technical Report.

Mineral Reserves estimate was prepared under the supervision of Jeremy W. Johnson, SME Registered Member, a qualified person and our Technical Services Superintendent at the Marigold mine. Mineral Resources estimate was prepared under the supervision of James N. Carver, SME Registered Member, our Exploration Manager at the Marigold mine, and Karthik Rathnam, MAusIMM (CP), our Resource Manager, Corporate, each of whom is a qualified person.

Mineral Reserves are reported within a design pit shell whereas Mineral Resources are constrained within a conceptual open pit shell. Mineral Reserves are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.065 g/t payable gold, which includes a calculation for royalty and metallurgical recovery within the block model. On-site costs incorporate the appropriate amount for sustaining capital within the respective average unit costs for mining of $1.91 per tonne mined, processing of $1.68 per tonne placed (heap leach), and site general of $0.74 per tonne placed.

Seabee Gold Operation
(2) 
Except for updates to cost parameters, mill recovery and dilution to include recent operating results, and resource modeling techniques based on recommendations set forth in the technical report entitled “NI 43- 101 Technical Report for the Seabee Gold Operation, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated October 20, 2017 (the “Seabee Gold Operation Technical Report”), all other key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources and the data verification procedures followed are set out in the Seabee Gold Operation Technical Report. For additional information about

 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 21





the Seabee Gold Operation, readers are encouraged to review the Seabee Gold Operation Technical Report.

Mineral Reserves estimate was prepared under the supervision of Kevin Fitzpatrick, P.Eng., a qualified person and our Engineering Supervisor at the Seabee Gold Operation. Mineral Resources estimate was prepared under the supervision of Jeffrey Kulas, P.Geo., a qualified person and our Manager Geology, Mining Operations at the Seabee Gold Operation.

Mineral Reserves are reported at a cut-off grade of 3.44 g/t gold. On-site costs include the average costs for mining of $54.17 per tonne processed, process and surface transport of $38.16 per tonne processed, and site general costs of $75.65 per tonne processed. The overall metallurgical recovery is 98.0% for gold.

Puna Operations
(3) 
Mineral Reserves estimates for Minera Pirquitas S.A. Operations was prepared under the supervision of Robert Gill, P.Eng., a qualified person and our General Manager at Minera Pirquitas S.A. Operations. Mineral Resources estimate was prepared under the supervision of F. Carl Edmunds, P.Geo., a qualified person and our Vice President, Exploration.

(4) 
Mineral Reserves for Chinchillas Mine are reported within a design pit shell whereas Mineral Resources are constrained within a conceptual open pit shell. Mineral Reserves are reported at a net smelter return (“NSR”) cut-off value of $44.11 per tonne, which incorporates the appropriate metallurgical recoveries and an amount for sustaining capital. On-site costs include the average costs for mining of $3.03 per tonne mined, surface transport cost of $9.80 per tonne hauled, rehandling cost of $1.93 per tonne crushed, processing of $16.89 per tonne processed, and site general costs of $9.70 per tonne processed.

(5) 
Mineral Resources for Pirquitas Underground are reported below the as-built open pit topographic surface above an NSR cut-off value of $100.00 per tonne. Additional factors of dilution, mine recovery and the requisite development costs were considered to exclude any potentially uneconomical stope shapes.

Pitarrilla Project
(6) 
Mineral Resources amenable to conventional open pit mining method are constrained within conceptual pit shell at an NSR cut-off value of $16.38 per tonne (leach) or $16.40 per tonne (flotation), which incorporates the appropriate metallurgical recoveries for the respective concentrates and off-site charges.

(7) 
Mineral Resources (Pitarrilla UG) are reported below the constrained open pit resource shell above an NSR cut-off value of $80.00 per tonne, using grade shells that have been trimmed to exclude distal and lone blocks that would not support development costs.

San Luis Project
(8) 
Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 6.0 g/t gold equivalent, using metal price assumptions of $600.00 per ounce of gold and $9.25 per ounce of silver.

Amisk Project
(9) 
Mineral Resources estimate was prepared by Glen Cole, P.Geo., Principal Resource Geologist, SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., a qualified person. Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.40 g/t gold equivalent, using metal price assumptions of $1,100 per ounce of gold and $16.00 per ounce of silver.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 22





Qualified Persons
The scientific and technical information contained in this news release relating to the Marigold mine has been reviewed and approved by Greg Gibson, P.E., and James N. Carver, each of whom is a SME Registered Member and a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). Mr. Gibson is our General Manager and Mr. Carver is our Exploration Manager at the Marigold mine. The scientific and technical information contained in this news release relating to the Seabee Gold Operation has been reviewed and approved by Cameron Chapman, P.Eng., and Jeffrey Kulas, P. Geo., each of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101. Mr. Chapman is our General Manager and Mr. Kulas is our Manager Geology, Mining Operations at the Seabee Gold Operation. The scientific and technical information contained in this news release relating to Puna Operations has been reviewed and approved by Robert Gill, P.Eng. and F. Carl Edmunds, P. Geo., each of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101. Mr. Gill is our General Manager at Puna Operations and Mr. Edmunds is our Vice President Exploration.

Management Discussion & Analysis and Conference Call

This news release should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the MD&A as filed with the Canadian Securities Administrators and available at www.sedar.com or our website at www.ssrmining.com.

▪
Conference call and webcast: Friday, February 21, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. EST.
 
Toll-free in U.S. and Canada:
+1 (800) 319-4610
 
All other callers:
+1 (416) 915-3239
 
Webcast:
http://ir.ssrmining.com/investors/events

▪
The conference call will be archived and available on our website.
Audio replay will be available for two weeks by calling:
 
Toll-free in U.S. and Canada:
+1 (855) 669-9658, replay code 3955
 
All other callers:
+1 (412) 317-0088, replay code 3955

About SSR Mining

SSR Mining Inc. is a Canadian-based precious metals producer with three operations, including the Marigold mine in Nevada, U.S., the Seabee Gold Operation in Saskatchewan, Canada and Puna Operations in Jujuy, Argentina. We also have two feasibility stage projects and a portfolio of exploration properties in North and South America. We are committed to delivering safe production through relentless emphasis on Operational Excellence. We are also focused on growing production and Mineral Reserves through the exploration and acquisition of assets for accretive growth, while maintaining financial strength.


SOURCE: SSR Mining Inc.





 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 23





For further information contact:
W. John DeCooman, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Business Development and Strategy
SSR Mining Inc.
Vancouver, BC
N.A. toll-free: +1 (888) 338-0046
All others: +1 (604) 689-3846
E-Mail: invest@ssrmining.com

To receive SSR Mining's news releases by e-mail, please register using the SSR Mining website at www.ssrmining.com.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

This news release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws and forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements.

Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “assumes,” “intends,” “strategy,” “goals,” “objectives,” “potential,” “believes,” or variations thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may,” “could,” “would,” “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms or similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this news release relate to, among other things: forecasts; outlook; guidance; future production of gold, silver and other metals; timing of production; future cash costs and AISC per payable ounce of gold, silver and other metals sold; the prices of gold, silver and other metals; our ability to discover new areas of mineralization, to add Mineral Reserves and to define additional Mineral Resources; the timing and extent of capital investment at our operations; the timing and extent of capitalized stripping at our operations; timing of production and production levels at the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations; achieving production records in 2020 at each of the Marigold mine and the Seabee Gold Operation; expected increase in access to higher grade ore at the Marigold mine and Seabee Gold Operation in 2020; expected increase in mining rates and mill throughput at the Seabee Gold Operation in 2020; expected capital, exploration and development expenditures; expected timing and benefits of the commissioning of the additional hydraulic loading unit at the Marigold mine in early 2020 and the construction of an additional leach pad at the Marigold mine in 2020; expected cost and timing of completion of the first and second phase of the expansion to tailings capacity at the Seabee Gold Operation in 2020 and 2021, respectively; upon completion of the Tailings Facility Expansion, expected tailings capacity for current mill throughput levels at the Seabee Gold Operation into the early 2030s; our expected drill programs at the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations; estimated mine life and extensions thereof, including anticipated extension of the mine life of the Marigold mine into the early 2030s, without requiring expansion of mining fleet or the associated expansion capital; timing of production at the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations; timing, focus and results of our exploration and development programs; the investments made in the Marigold mine and the Seabee Gold Operation benefiting future periods; the expected high inflation rates in Argentina generally offsetting the benefits of the devaluation of the currency; current financial resources being sufficient to carry out plans, commitments and business requirements for the next twelve months; movements in gold prices not impacting the value of any financial instruments; estimated production rates for gold, silver and other metals produced by us; the estimated cost of sustaining capital; ongoing or future development plans and capital replacement; estimates of expected or anticipated economic returns from our mining projects, including future sales of metals, concentrate or other products produced by us and the timing thereof; and our plans and expectations for our properties and operations.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 24





These forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied, including, without limitation, the following: uncertainty of production, development plans and cost estimates for the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation, Puna Operations and our projects; our ability to replace Mineral Reserves; commodity price fluctuations; political or economic instability and unexpected regulatory changes; currency fluctuations; the possibility of future losses; general economic conditions; counterparty and market risks related to the sale of our concentrate and metals; uncertainty in the accuracy of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates and in our ability to extract mineralization profitably; differences in U.S. and Canadian practices for reporting Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources; lack of suitable infrastructure or damage to existing infrastructure; future development risks, including start-up delays and cost overruns; our ability to obtain adequate financing for further exploration and development programs and opportunities; uncertainty in acquiring additional commercially mineable mineral rights; delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with our permits; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and management; the impact of governmental regulations, including health, safety and environmental regulations, including increased costs and restrictions on operations due to compliance with such regulations; unpredictable risks and hazards related to the development and operation of a mine or mineral property that are beyond our control; reclamation and closure requirements for our mineral properties; potential labour unrest, including labour actions by our unionized employees at Puna Operations; indigenous peoples' title claims and rights to consultation and accommodation may affect our existing operations as well as development projects and future acquisitions; certain transportation risks that could have a negative impact on our ability to operate; assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; recoverability of value added tax and significant delays in the collection process in Argentina; claims and legal proceedings, including adverse rulings in litigation against us and/or our directors or officers; compliance with anti-corruption laws and internal controls, and increased regulatory compliance costs; complying with emerging climate change regulations and the impact of climate change; fully realizing our interest in deferred consideration received in connection with recent divestitures; fully realizing the value of our shareholdings in our marketable securities, due to changes in price, liquidity or disposal cost of such marketable securities; uncertainties related to title to our mineral properties and the ability to obtain surface rights; the sufficiency of our insurance coverage; civil disobedience in the countries where our mineral properties are located; operational safety and security risks; actions required to be taken by us under human rights law; competition in the mining industry for mineral properties; our ability to complete and successfully integrate an announced acquisition; reputation loss resulting in decreased investor confidence, increased challenges in developing and maintaining community relations and an impediment to our overall ability to advance our projects; an event of default under our 2013 Notes or our 2019 Notes may significantly reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business; failure to meet covenants under our senior secured revolving credit facility; information systems security threats; conflicts of interest that could arise from certain of our directors' and officers' involvement with other natural resource companies; and those other various risks and uncertainties identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Information Form filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the SEC.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements are based on what our management considers to be reasonable assumptions, beliefs, expectations and opinions based on the information currently available to it. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, our ability to carry on our exploration and development activities, our ability to meet our obligations under our property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves on our mineral properties, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of our projects, the price of the minerals we produce, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, our ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner, our ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms, our ability to continue operating the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations, dilution and mining recovery assumptions, assumptions regarding stockpiles, the success of mining, processing, exploration and development activities, the accuracy of geological, mining and metallurgical estimates, no significant unanticipated operational or technical difficulties, maintaining good relations with the communities surrounding the Marigold mine, the Seabee Gold Operation and Puna Operations, no significant events or changes relating to regulatory, environmental,

 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 25





health and safety matters, certain tax matters and no significant and continuing adverse changes in general economic conditions or conditions in the financial markets (including commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and inflation rates). You are cautioned that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all factors and assumptions which may have been used. We cannot assure you that actual events, performance or results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements, and management’s assumptions may prove to be incorrect. Our forward-looking statements reflect current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date hereof and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors

This news release includes Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources classification terms that comply with reporting standards in Canada and the Mineral Reserves and the Mineral Resources estimates are made in accordance with NI 43-101. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC set out in SEC Industry Guide 7. Consequently, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources information included in this news release is not comparable to similar information that would generally be disclosed by domestic U.S. reporting companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC. Under SEC standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.

In addition, the SEC’s disclosure standards normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “Measured Mineral Resources,” “Indicated Mineral Resources” or “Inferred Mineral Resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the SEC. U.S. investors should understand that “Inferred Mineral Resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. Moreover, the requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC, and reserves reported by us in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable with information made public by companies that report in accordance with U.S. standards.

Cautionary Note Regarding Non-GAAP Measures

This news release includes certain non-GAAP performance measures throughout this document. These performance measures are employed by us to measure our operating and economic performance internally and to assist in decision-making, as well as providing key performance information to senior management. We believe that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, certain investors and other stakeholders also use this information to evaluate our operating and financial performance; however, these non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, these performance measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements. Readers should refer to our MD&A, available on www.sedar.com under the heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a more detailed discussion of how we calculate certain of such measures and a reconciliation of certain measures to GAAP terms.


 
 
 
SSR Mining Inc.
 
PAGE 26