MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS

| | | | | | | | | | | |
| A. HOW WE REPORT OUR RESULTS | | I. CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT |
| | | 1. Capital |
| B. OVERVIEW | | 2. Capital Adequacy |
| 1. Strategy | | 3. Shareholder Dividends |
| 2. Financial Objectives | | 4. Principal Sources and Uses of Funds |
| 3. Sustainability Plan | | 5. Liquidity |
| 4. Acquisitions and Other | | |
| 5. COVID-19 | | J. RISK MANAGEMENT |
| | | 1. Risk Management Framework |
| C. FINANCIAL SUMMARY | | 2. Risk Governance |
| | | 3. Risk Universe |
| D. PROFITABILITY | | 4. Risk Appetite |
| | | 5. Risk Management Policies |
| E. GROWTH | | 6. Risk Management Process |
| 1. Sales and Value of New Business | | 7. Three Lines of Defence |
| 2. Assets Under Management | | 8. Risk Culture and Philosophy |
| | | 9. Risk Categories |
| F. FINANCIAL STRENGTH | | |
| | | K. ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
| G. PERFORMANCE BY BUSINESS GROUP | | 1. Selected Annual Information |
| 1. Canada | | 2. Items related to Statement of Operations |
| 2. U.S. | | 3. Items related to Statement of Financial Position |
| 3. Asset Management | | 4. Fourth Quarter 2021 Profitability |
| 4. Asia | | 5. Fourth Quarter 2021 Growth |
| 5. Corporate | | 6. Previous Quarters |
| | | |
| H. INVESTMENTS | | L. NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES |
| 1. Investment Profile | | |
| 2. Debt Securities | | M. ACCOUNTING AND CONTROL MATTERS |
| 3. Equities | | 1. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates |
| 4. Mortgages and Loans | | 2. Changes in Accounting Policies |
| 5. Derivatives | | 3. Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
| 6. Investment Properties | | |
| 7. Impaired Assets | | N. LEGAL AND REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS |
| 8. Asset Default Provision | | |
| | | O. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 9
Management's Discussion and Analysis
February 9, 2022
| | | | | |
| A. How We Report Our Results | |
Sun Life is a leading international financial services organization providing asset management, wealth, insurance and health solutions to individual and institutional Clients. Sun Life has operations in a number of markets worldwide, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, India, China, Australia, Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia and Bermuda. As of December 31, 2021, Sun Life had total assets under management ("AUM") of $1.44 trillion. For more information please visit www.sunlife.com.
Sun Life Financial Inc. trades on the Toronto (TSX), New York (NYSE) and Philippine (PSE) stock exchanges under the ticker symbol SLF.
Sun Life Financial Inc. ("SLF Inc.") is a publicly traded company domiciled in Canada and is the holding company of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada ("Sun Life Assurance"). In this management's discussion and analysis ("MD&A"), SLF Inc., its subsidiaries and, where applicable, its joint ventures and associates are collectively referred to as "the Company", "Sun Life", "we", "our", and "us". Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this MD&A is presented as at and for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the information contained in this document is in Canadian dollars.
Where information at and for the year ended December 31, 2021 is not available, information available for the latest period before December 31, 2021 is used. Except where otherwise noted, financial information is presented in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and the accounting requirements of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions ("OSFI"). Reported net income (loss) refers to Common shareholders' net income (loss) determined in accordance with IFRS.
We manage our operations and report our financial results in five business segments: Canada, United States ("U.S."), Asset Management, Asia, and Corporate. Information concerning these segments is included in our annual and interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes ("Annual Consolidated Financial Statements" and "Interim Consolidated Financial Statements", respectively, and "Consolidated Financial Statements" collectively), and this MD&A document.
1. Use of Non-IFRS Financial Measures
We report certain financial information using non-IFRS financial measures, as we believe that these measures provide information that is useful to investors in understanding our performance and facilitate a comparison of our quarterly and full year results from period to period. These non-IFRS financial measures do not have any standardized meaning and may not be comparable with similar measures used by other companies. For certain non-IFRS financial measures, there are no directly comparable amounts under IFRS. These non-IFRS financial measures should not be viewed in isolation from or as alternatives to measures of financial performance determined in accordance with IFRS. Additional information concerning non-IFRS financial measures and, if applicable, reconciliations to the closest IFRS measures are available in section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document and the Supplementary Financial Information package that is available on www.sunlife.com under Investors - Financial results and reports.
2. Forward-looking Statements
Certain statements in this document are forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, including the "safe harbour" provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation. Additional information concerning forward-looking statements and important risk factors that could cause our assumptions, estimates, expectations and projections to be inaccurate and our actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements can be found in section O - Forward-looking Statements in this document.
3. Additional Information
Additional information about SLF Inc. can be found in the Consolidated Financial Statements, the annual and interim MD&A, and SLF Inc.'s Annual Information Form ("AIF") for the year ended December 31, 2021. These documents are filed with securities regulators in Canada and are available at www.sedar.com. SLF Inc.'s Annual Consolidated Financial Statements, annual MD&A and AIF are filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in SLF Inc.'s annual report on Form 40-F and SLF Inc.'s interim MD&A and Interim Consolidated Financial Statements are furnished to the SEC on Form 6-Ks and are available at www.sec.gov.
4. COVID-19 Pandemic Considerations
In early 2020, the world was impacted by COVID-19, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is still uncertain and dependent on the progression of the virus and on actions taken by governments, businesses and individuals, which could vary by country and result in differing outcomes. Given the extent of the circumstances, it is difficult to reliably measure or predict the potential impact of this uncertainty on our future financial results.
For additional information, refer to sections B - Overview - 5 - COVID-19 and J - Risk Management - 9 - Risks relating to the COVID-19 pandemic in this document.
10 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Sun Life is a leading international financial services organization providing a diverse range of asset management, wealth, insurance, and health solutions to individual and institutional Clients. We have four business pillars: Asset Management, Canada, U.S. and Asia.
1. Strategy
In 2021, we refreshed our enterprise strategy to reflect our priorities and evolving business mix:
Purpose and Ambition
Our Purpose is to help our Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives.
We seek to provide outstanding value and impact for our Clients in three ways:
Drive positive financial actions by:
•Helping Clients build and protect their wealth.
•Providing quality products and solutions that meet the needs of our Clients.
•Delivering timely and expert advice through consistently superior Client experiences.
Deliver long-term Client investment returns by:
•Leveraging our collective expertise to make better investment decisions.
•Sourcing broad investment capabilities to serve global Client needs.
•Actively engaging with our Clients to think and act sustainably.
Drive positive health actions by:
•Helping Clients navigate, manage, and receive the care they need.
•Improving health outcomes, including physical and mental well-being, by expanding health products and solutions.
•Being a trusted payer of benefits.
Our ambition is "to be one of the best asset management and insurance companies in the world". Achieving our ambition will rely on maintaining our balanced business mix and leading positions across our pillars, delivering on our Purpose and Client Impact strategy, and strong business execution to meet our medium-term financial objectives(1):
•Underlying Earnings Per Share growth: 8-10%.
•Underlying Return on Equity: 16%+.
•Underlying Dividend Payout Ratio: 40%-50%.
(1)For more information about our medium-term financial objectives, see section B - Overview - 2 - Financial Objectives in this document. Underlying earnings per share, underlying ROE and underlying dividend payout ratio are Non-IFRS financial measures. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 11
Our Four Pillars
Our four pillars define the businesses and markets in which we compete. In each of these pillars, we focus on creating value and positively impacting our Clients and shareholders in businesses that have strong growth prospects, favourable return on equity ("ROE"), and strong capital generation in attractive global markets. We are well-positioned across each of our pillars.
Asset Management: A global leader in both public and alternative asset classes through MFS and SLC Management
We deliver value and drive positive Client impact through our offering of quality investment products, including active asset management as well as liability driven investing ("LDI") and alternative asset classes:
•MFS Investment Management ("MFS") is a premier active investment manager offering a comprehensive selection of asset management products and services to retail and institutional investors around the world.
•SLC Management is an institutional investment manager delivering customized LDI, alternative fixed income, private credit, infrastructure and global real estate solutions.
Canada: A leader in insurance and asset management
We deliver value and impact to over 6.5 million Clients via our group and individual businesses, helping Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives.
•A health business that focuses on helping Canadians live healthy lives, both as the largest provider of group benefits in Canada and with a growing focus on innovative products and services that lead to better health outcomes.
•A market leader in group retirement services in the workplace, including defined contribution pensions, and defined benefit pension de-risking.
•Provide a wide range of asset management, wealth, health and protection solutions to retail Clients.
U.S.: A leader in health and benefits
We have deep expertise in the health-care market, and a strong track record of helping our Clients get the coverage they need while improving health outcomes.
•The largest independent provider of medical stop-loss insurance in the U.S.
•A market leader in group benefits serving employees and their families with employer-sponsored benefits at workplaces of all sizes across the country including group life, disability, dental, vision, voluntary and supplemental health products.
•A leader in providing turnkey solutions for insurance and health plan partners through FullscopeRMS, including disability, absence management, life, stop-loss and supplemental health coverages.
Asia: A regional leader focused on fast-growing markets
We are well-positioned in Asia, with operations in China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Vietnam. These markets account for approximately 65% of Asia’s GDP with high potential for future growth(1).
•A provider of individual life and health insurance that delivers Client value across all of our markets.
•A provider, in select markets, of asset management and group retirement products and services.
•Among the global leaders in providing life insurance solutions to high-net-worth Clients.
Our Client Impact Strategy
Our Client Impact strategy has seven key strategic areas of focus that we are pursuing across our four pillars. These areas of focus define how we compete in our markets, extend our competitive advantages, fulfill our Purpose and support our ambition to be one of the best asset management and insurance companies in the world.
Client Impact: Our Clients are at the centre of everything we do. Whether it is helping to navigate health concerns, save and plan for retirement or provide financial security for their families, our focus is on the impact we have on our Clients' lives. We believe this allows us to maximize positive impacts for Clients, builds lasting and trusted Client relationships and leads to better business outcomes for Sun Life. We are committed to helping Clients by driving positive health and financial actions, and delivering long-term investment returns.
Distribution Excellence: We have established an omni-channel approach to distribution that makes it easier for our Clients to do business with us across all markets. To excel at distribution, we prioritize exceptional service, connecting with our Clients when and how they want to engage, and providing personalized and holistic solutions. We are focused on meeting our Clients' needs by being an exceptional distribution partner that empowers our advisors and partners to harness digital solutions to provide seamless Client experiences.
Digital Leadership: We are accelerating our digital, data and analytics ambitions and seek to think and act like a digital company. Our Digital Enterprise strategy brings our businesses and technology teams closer together and transforms how we work in an agile way to deliver digital experiences, products, and solutions that meet our Clients’ needs and drive positive outcomes. We continue to adopt Client-centric solutions that incorporate our Clients’ perspectives in every stage of their lives, creating long-term relationships.
Our Digital Enterprise strategy is focused on:
•Creating deep Client relationships enabled by leading digital capabilities and analytics.
•Delivering personalized experiences for Clients by harnessing our data to provide insights and enhance Client experiences.
•Evolving how we work together and driving faster decisions that are made closer to the Client.
(1)Source: International Monetary Fund, 2021.
12 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Financial Discipline: Our strategy is underpinned by a continued commitment to strong financial prudence and risk management, coupled with a focus on capital management. Sustained focus across these areas support our medium-term financial objectives and our aim of top quartile total shareholder returns. Specific areas of focus include:
•Delivering strong, stable earnings growth and disciplined expense management.
•Adequately managing our capital to protect our policyholders and to maintain strong financial flexibility, while optimizing the benefits for our shareholders.
•Disciplined investment and a programmatic M&A(1) approach focused on building scale and capabilities.
Sustainability Driven: Sustainability is essential to our long-term business success. We strive to embed sustainability into our strategy, culture, and operations, to drive meaningful social and economic outcomes for our Clients, employees, advisors, investors and communities. We believe our actions will contribute to a healthier, more financially resilient, environmentally secure, and economically prosperous world. See Section B - Overview - 3 - Sustainability Plan in this document for more information about our approach to sustainability.
Empowered People and Inclusive Culture: Delivering on our strategy will require us to attract, retain, and develop the best talent, and to empower our people to drive results. It will also require us to preserve and strengthen our strong culture of Client focus, integrity, collaboration and inclusivity. Specifically, our focus is to:
•Empower employees and advisors to take action, make decisions, and be accountable.
•Develop talent with both technology and leadership skills, to support our transformation to a leading digital organization.
•Maintain momentum on our diversity, equity and inclusion (“DE&I”) commitment, embedding DE&I into our decision-making to reflect our values.
•Design our future of work with intent, offering employees choice and flexibility in how and where we work
•Be the employer of choice for top talent.
Trusted Brand: Preserving our long standing reputation of being a trusted brand is paramount in an increasingly complex and digitized world. Over the last 150 years, we have built and enjoyed a strong, trusted relationship with our Clients in all Sun Life markets and through our distribution partnerships. Our forward-looking brand strategy will maintain a focus on ensuring future competitive advantage and brand appeal with new and existing Clients. This will inform the innovative and differentiated Sun Life experiences we create, the products and service experiences we deliver, and the culture we live by, to achieve our Purpose.
Key Strategic Priorities
Together with the strong foundation of our four pillars and key strategic areas of focus, our strategy emphasizes four key strategic priorities to accelerate growth and improve competitive positioning:
1.Think and act like a digital company.
2.Realize synergies between asset management and insurance businesses.
3.Build scale and capabilities through M&A and strategic partnerships.
4.Deliver on our health strategy in Canada, the U.S., and Asia.
We believe we are well-positioned to execute on each of these strategic priorities and that doing so will create positive Client Impact and further differentiate us from peers.
Our balanced four pillars, holistic Client Impact strategy, and focus on our strategic priorities combine elements that have been core to our success together with emerging areas of increasing importance. Looking ahead, we are confident that our strategy will allow us to deliver on our Purpose, drive positive Client outcomes, create meaningful value for our shareholders, and support our ambition to be one of the best asset management and insurance companies in the world.
(1)Mergers & Acquisitions ("M&A").
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 13
2. Financial Objectives
Our medium-term financial objectives are outlined as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Measure(1) | Medium-term financial objectives(2) | 5-Year(3) | 2021 results |
Underlying EPS growth Growth in EPS reflects the Company's focus on generating sustainable earnings for shareholders. | 8%-10% | 10% | 10% |
Underlying Return on Equity ("ROE") ROE is a significant driver of shareholder value and is a major focus for management across all businesses. | 16%+ | 14.2% | 15.4% |
Underlying dividend payout ratio Payout of capital versus shareholder value, based on underlying net income. | 40%-50% | 40% | 38% |
(1)Underlying earnings per share ("EPS"), underlying ROE and underlying dividend payout ratio are non-IFRS financial measures. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document. Underlying dividend payout ratio represents the ratio of common shareholders' dividends to diluted underlying EPS. See section I - Capital and Liquidity Management - 3 - Shareholder Dividends in this document for further information regarding dividends.
(2)Although considered reasonable, we may not be able to achieve our medium-term financial objectives as our assumptions may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual results could differ materially from our medium-term financial objectives as described above. Our medium-term financial objectives do not constitute guidance. Our medium-term financial objectives are forward-looking non-IFRS financial measures and additional information is provided in this MD&A in the section O - Forward-looking Statements - Medium-Term Financial Objectives.
(3)Underlying EPS growth is calculated using a compound annual growth rate. Underlying ROE and dividend payout ratio are calculated using an average.
In the year and over the medium-term, we have performed well against our medium-term financial objectives. In addition, in 2021, we increased our underlying ROE medium-term financial objective to 16%+ from our previous objective of 12% to 14%. This update is supported by strong business performance and a meaningful shift in mix towards businesses which generate higher ROE.
3. Sustainability Plan
Our sustainability plan is aligned directly with our Purpose of helping our Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives, and is integrated into our enterprise strategy. We focus on three areas where we have the greatest opportunity to have a positive impact on society, while creating a competitive advantage for our business.
Increasing Financial Security: We provide Clients and employees with innovative solutions and services that increase their lifetime financial security. We empower and educate Clients to take positive financial action, increasing access to wealth and protection products, helping to build long-term wealth and close insurance coverage gaps.
Fostering Healthier Lives: We offer Clients and employees products and tools to live healthier lives. In addition, we are focused on improving health and wellness in society through investments in community health and access to health and disability insurance.
Advancing Sustainable Investing: We aspire to deliver sustainable returns for our Clients and drive the transition to a low-carbon, sustainable economy. We embed sustainability in our investment processes, offering Clients and employees sustainable investing opportunities. In addition, we invest our own assets in ways that support a low-carbon and more inclusive economy.
Our sustainability plan builds from our foundation as a Trusted and Responsible Business. We prioritize foundational sustainability considerations that are important to stakeholders: climate change, diversity, equity & inclusion, data security & privacy, talent management, governance & ethics, risk management, and reporting & disclosure. We recognize climate change as one of the defining issues of our time and commit to working together across industries, with our Clients, investees and other stakeholders to contribute to solving this global challenge.
Our sustainability plan is guided by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals ("SDGs"). We focus primarily on supporting the five SDGs where we believe we can have the greatest influence and impact. These are: #3 Good health & well-being, #5 Gender equality, #7 Affordable and clean energy, #8 Decent work and economic growth and #13 Climate action.
In 2021, we further advanced our commitment to a cleaner, more inclusive and sustainable future with the announcement of our goal to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner as an asset owner and manager, along with the appointment of our first Chief Sustainability Officer.
For additional information on our sustainability plan and recent progress, refer to www.sunlife.com/sustainability. For more information on our approach to climate change, refer to the heading "Environmental and Social Risk Section" in section J - Risk Management - 9 - Business and Strategy Risks of this document, which includes our disclosure based on the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”).
4. Acquisitions and Other
The following developments occurred since January 1, 2021. Additional information concerning acquisitions and dispositions is provided in our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
On January 1, 2021, our subsidiary, Sun Life Vietnam Insurance Company Limited ("Sun Life Vietnam"), and Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank ("ACB") launched a 15-year exclusive bancassurance partnership in Vietnam.
14 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
On January 5, 2021, we completed our acquisition of a majority stake of Crescent(1) ("Crescent acquisition"), a U.S.-based global alternative credit investment manager. Total cash consideration of $308 million (US$241 million) was paid. The acquisition extends SLC Management's solutions in alternative credit, which will benefit existing and prospective Clients. Crescent had more than 180 partners and employees and approximately $39.1 billion in AUM (US$30.7 billion), as at January 5, 2021. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements.
On July 1, 2021, we completed the acquisition of Pinnacle Care International, Inc. ("PinnacleCare"), a leading U.S. health care navigation and medical intelligence provider, for $110 million (US$85 million). PinnacleCare joins our U.S. Group Benefits business in the medical stop-loss organization, the largest independent medical stop-loss provider in the country. The acquisition expands our medical stop-loss business beyond the traditional model that reimburses employers after care has occurred, to one that engages employees at diagnosis to help improve the entire care experience and outcomes for both the employee and employer. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2021.
On October 3, 2021, we entered into an agreement to acquire DentaQuest(2). DentaQuest is the largest provider of Medicaid dental benefits in the U.S., with growing Medicare Advantage, commercial and U.S. Affordable Care Act exchange businesses, and serves more than 33 million members. The acquisition of DentaQuest aligns to our business strategy of being a leader in health and group benefits. Upon close, which is expected in the first half of 2022, DentaQuest will more than double the size of Sun Life's U.S. employee benefits business by revenues and will position us as a leader in providing government dental benefits.
On October 12, 2021, we announced that our India joint venture, Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited ("ABSLAMC") completed an Initial Public Offering ("IPO"). As a result of the IPO, our ownership interest was reduced by 12.5% and we have realized a gain of $362 million (post-tax $297 million). After the IPO, we retained ownership of the listed entity of 36.5%. Shares of ABSLAMC began trading on the BSE Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited on October 11, 2021. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements.
On December 13, 2021, we announced that Canadian Premier Life Insurance Company ("Canadian Premier") entered into an agreement to acquire the sponsored markets business from Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada ("SLA"), a wholly owned subsidiary of SLF Inc. Sponsored markets include a variety of association & affinity, and group creditor clients. This transaction will see over 100 plan sponsors and roughly 1.5 million insured clients and plan members move from Sun Life to Canadian Premier. The transaction is expected to close in early 2023, subject to satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals. Upon close of the transaction, Sun Life expects to generate an after-tax gain of approximately $65 million, with a corresponding 1% increase to the SLF and SLA LICAT ratios, and approximately $0.03 reduction in annual underlying earnings per share going forward.
5. COVID-19
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 as a pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures imposed by governments around the world to limit its spread including travel restrictions, business closures, social distancing protocols, school closures, quarantines, and restrictions on gatherings and events, have disrupted the global economy, financial markets, supply chains, business activity and productivity in unprecedented ways.
We have and we will continue to adjust our operations across each of our businesses as government restrictions and measures around the globe evolve. We have taken proactive measures through our business continuity processes, which are designed to ensure that key business functions and normal operations can continue effectively and efficiently in the event of a disruption. We have processes in place to monitor and maintain ongoing systems availability, stability and security.
Due to various restrictions, the majority of our employees and advisors continue to work from home. Our working from home strategy continues to operate effectively and, depending on each location, the return to offices has been gradual and measured to ensure the health and safety of our employees and our communities. We have also introduced new policies which provide employees more flexibility to empower them to optimize their work and personal priorities.
Our communities are vital and we have been taking actions to support them. Since the start of the pandemic, we donated more than $4.5 million to support communities impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic for causes supporting areas such as the food bank, health inequities and vaccine distribution efforts. We have also donated to food banks and provided hand sanitizer to various communities, while digital life insurance coverage was donated to doctors, nurses, and other medical support staff as a way of saying "Thank you" for their efforts to stop the spread of COVID-19.
Awareness and concern about mental health and well-being was amplified throughout the pandemic. Sun Life helped bridge the gap by hosting an executive summit on mental health in the workplace, offering mental health resources and support through digital platforms, like Lumino Health, and for Group Benefits Clients in Canada, providing access to personalized mental health coaching resources. The pandemic also accelerated the need for digital tools and innovation to support Clients where and when they need it. From virtual health care, to new online products and services, to enhancing the ability for digital insurance applications, wealth transactions and eClaims, we made it easier for Clients to do business with us across our operations. We continue to support our Clients throughout this difficult time. To date, Sun Life has delivered nearly $900 million in COVID-19-related health and life insurance benefits to Clients and their families at a time when they needed it the most.
(1)Crescent Capital Group LP ("Crescent").
(2)DentaQuest Group, Inc. ("DentaQuest").
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 15
Regulatory Responses to COVID-19
Sun Life is subject to regulation and supervision by government authorities in the jurisdictions in which it does business. Various regulators have introduced new measures or adjustments to respond to the evolving situation with the COVID-19 pandemic.
OSFI(1), which supervises the activities of Sun Life, has announced various measures to support the resilience of the financial institutions that it regulates. On March 13, 2020, OSFI set the expectation for all federally regulated financial institutions that dividend increases and share buybacks should be halted. On November 4, 2021, OSFI lifted this restriction on the basis that these restrictions were no longer considered necessary.
In the U.S., state insurance regulators issued an unprecedented volume of emergency measures to address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on policyholders in 2020. These regulatory changes impacted policy administration and business practices for the U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners issued guidance to U.S. insurers on March 27, 2020 encouraging insurers to work with borrowers who may be unable to meet obligations because of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and on April 15, 2020 adopted interpretations of statutory accounting principles applicable to U.S. insurers related to, among other things, direct mortgage loans and Schedule BA mortgages. In the fourth quarter of 2020, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners adopted interpretations of statutory accounting principles that extend these concepts to statutory financial statements and risk-based capital calculations through the fourth quarter of 2021.
Impact on our Results and Operations
COVID-19 has had varying degrees of impacts on our net income and other financial metrics, including sales, claims and benefits, premiums and fee income.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, sales results have been mixed across our products and businesses. Some markets benefited from investments in digital tools, pre-existing sales pipelines, re-pricing and return to office opportunities. In other markets, we experienced significant sales declines resulting from strict quarantine protocols impacting face-to-face sales transactions.
We also experienced favourable morbidity experience, mostly in the first half of 2020, due to lower benefit utilization of dental, extended health care, vision, and hospital and surgical coverages. However, as restrictions eased with health care providers enhancing safety measures, benefit utilization has returned to near normal levels in 2021. The unfavourable morbidity in Canada is also related to lower resolution rates from disability experience reflecting more challenging conditions exacerbated by pandemic-related issues, such as mental health and delayed treatment. Unfavourable mortality in the current year was primarily in the U.S., reflecting elevated case counts in the working-age population. The pandemic also adversely impacted mortality in Asia.
While rising vaccination rates have supported an easing of containment measures in some geographies, progress towards re-opening has been accompanied by resurgences in the spread of COVID-19 including variants and the re-imposition of restrictions. The overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is still uncertain and dependent on the progression of the virus, including variants, mass vaccine production and distribution, vaccine efficacy, public acceptance of containment measures and vaccine adoption, the subsequent reduction in rates of infection and the actions taken by governments, monetary authorities, regulators, financial institutions, businesses and individuals, which could vary by country and result in differing outcomes. In addition, the business landscape we operate in is shifting and the longer term impacts from containment measures on the economy and Client behaviour, after the COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted, as well as long-term health impacts from COVID-19, is difficult to predict. Examples include reductions on office space as more employees shift to remote working or higher demand for employer health coverage. Given the extent of the circumstances, it is difficult to reliably measure or predict the potential impact of this uncertainty on our future financial results. For additional information, please refer to section J - 9 - Risks relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic in this document.
(1) The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions ("OSFI"). For additional information, see Section F - Financial Strength in this document.
16 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions, unless otherwise noted) | | | | | |
| | |
| Profitability | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| Net income (loss) | | | | | |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | | | | 3,934 | | 2,404 | |
| Underlying net income (loss)(1) | | | | 3,533 | | 3,213 | |
| Diluted earnings per share ("EPS") ($) | | | | | |
| Reported EPS (diluted) | | | | 6.69 | | 4.10 | |
| Underlying EPS (diluted)(1) | | | | 6.03 | | 5.49 | |
| Reported basic EPS ($) | | | | 6.72 | | 4.11 | |
| Return on equity ("ROE") (%) | | | | | |
| Reported ROE(1) | | | | 17.1 | % | 10.8 | % |
| Underlying ROE(1) | | | | 15.4 | % | 14.4 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Growth | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| Sales | | | | | |
| Insurance sales(1) | | | | 3,674 | | 3,501 | |
| Wealth sales(1)(2) | | | | 228,408 | | 220,860 | |
| Value of new business ("VNB")(1)(3) | | | | 1,346 | | 1,146 | |
| Assets under management(1)(4) | | | | | |
| General fund assets | | | | 205,374 | | 197,090 | |
| Segregated funds | | | | 139,996 | | 125,921 | |
| Mutual funds, managed funds and other AUM(1)(4) | | | | 1,099,358 | | 932,998 | |
| Total AUM(1)(4) | | | | 1,444,728 | | 1,256,009 | |
| | | | | | |
| Financial Strength | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| LICAT ratios(5) | | | | | |
| Sun Life Financial Inc. | | | | 145 | % | 147 | % |
| Sun Life Assurance(6) | | | | 124 | % | 127 | % |
| Financial leverage ratio(1)(7) | | | | 25.5 | % | 23.5 | % |
| Dividend | | | | | |
| Dividend payout ratio(1) | | | | 38 | % | 40 | % |
| Dividends per common share ($) | | | | 2.310 | | 2.200 | |
| Capital | | | | | |
| Subordinated debt(7) | | | | 6,425 | | 4,781 | |
| Innovative capital instruments(8) | | | | 200 | | 200 | |
| Participating policyholders' equity | | | | 1,700 | | 1,368 | |
| Non-controlling interest equity | | | | 59 | | 25 | |
| Preferred shares and other equity instruments | | | | 2,239 | | 2,257 | |
| Common shareholders' equity(9) | | | | 24,075 | | 22,212 | |
| Total capital(7) | | | | 34,698 | | 30,843 | |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic EPS (millions) | | | | 586 | | 585 | |
| Closing common shares outstanding (millions) | | | | 586 | | 585 | |
(1)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(2)Effective January 1, 2021, the methodology for gross flows and outflows was updated for SLC Management. Prior period amounts have not been updated. For more details, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(3)Effective January 1, 2021, reflects a change in the timing of recognition of U.S. VNB for group policies. We have updated prior period amounts to reflect this change. For more details, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(4)Effective January 1, 2021, the methodology for AUM was updated for SLC Management with respect to certain real estate and investment-grade fixed income products to include uncalled capital commitments. We have updated prior period amounts to reflect this change. For more details, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(5)Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test ("LICAT") ratio. Our LICAT ratios are calculated in accordance with OSFI-mandated guideline, Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test.
(6)Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada ("Sun Life Assurance") is SLF Inc.’s principal operating life insurance subsidiary.
(7)Includes $2.0 billion of proceeds from the subordinated debt offerings completed in November 2021, of which $1.5 billion is subject to contractual terms requiring us to redeem the underlying securities, in full, if the closing of the DentaQuest acquisition does not occur. These amounts will not qualify as LICAT capital until the acquisition closes.
(8)Innovative capital instruments consist of Sun Life ExchangEable Capital Securities ("SLEECS"), which qualify as regulatory capital. However, under IFRS they are reported as Senior debentures in the Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information, see section I - Capital and Liquidity Management in this document.
(9)Common shareholders’ equity is equal to Total shareholders’ equity less Preferred shares and other equity instruments.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 17
The following table reconciles our Common shareholders' net income ("reported net income") and underlying net income. The table also sets out the impacts that other notable items had on our reported net income and underlying net income. All factors discussed in this document that impact our underlying net income are also applicable to reported net income.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | | 3,934 | | 2,404 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | | | | | 627 | | (461) | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | | | | | 74 | | (143) | |
Other adjustments(1) | | | | | (300) | | (205) | |
Underlying net income(2) | | | | | 3,533 | | 3,213 | |
Reported ROE(2) | | | | | 17.1 | % | 10.8 | % |
Underlying ROE(2) | | | | | 15.4 | % | 14.4 | % |
Experience-related items attributable to reported and underlying net income(2)(3) | | | | | | |
| Impacts of investment activity on insurance contract liabilities ("investing activity") | | | | | 144 | | 258 | |
| Credit | | | | | 114 | | (57) | |
| Mortality | | | | | (111) | | (39) | |
| Morbidity | | | | | 39 | | 125 | |
| Lapse and other policyholder behaviour ("policyholder behaviour") | | | | | (31) | | (60) | |
| Expenses | | | | | (170) | | (93) | |
| Other experience | | | | | (56) | | (35) | |
Total of experience-related items(2)(3) | | | | | (71) | | 99 | |
(1)Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment, including pre-tax amounts.
(2)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(3)Experience-related items reflect the difference between actual experience during the reporting period and best estimate assumptions used in the determination of our insurance contract liabilities. Experience-related items are a part of the Sources of Earnings framework, and are calculated in accordance with OSFI Guideline D-9, Sources of Earnings Disclosures. Experience-related items from our India, China and Malaysia joint ventures and associates are recorded within other experience.
2021 vs. 2020
2021 reported net income of $3,934 million increased $1,530 million or 64% compared to 2020, driven by favourable market-related impacts, a $297 million gain on the IPO of our India joint venture, and ACMA(1) impacts, partially offset by a $153 million increase in SLC Management’s acquisition-related liabilities(2). Underlying net income of $3,533 million(3) increased $320 million or 10%, driven by broad-based business growth across our pillars, with particular strength in asset management and wealth, reflecting higher asset values. Underlying net income also benefited from a lower effective tax rate in the year(4), largely offset by experience-related items, which included $225 million of COVID-19-related mortality and morbidity. In addition, experience in the year included unfavourable expense experience, partially offset by investing activity gains and favourable credit. Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $177 million in reported net income and $164 million in underlying net income.
1.Market-related impacts
Market-related impacts in 2021 resulted in an increase of $627 million to reported net income compared to a decrease of $461 million in 2020, reflecting higher equity markets, an increase in the value of our real estate investments and interest rate impacts. See Section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of the components of market-related impacts.
2.Assumption changes and management actions
Due to the long-term nature of our business, we make certain judgments involving assumptions and estimates to value our obligations to policyholders. The valuation of these obligations is recorded in our financial statements as insurance contract liabilities and investment contract liabilities and requires us to make assumptions about equity market performance, interest rates, asset default, mortality and morbidity rates, policyholder behaviour, expenses and inflation and other factors over the life of our products. We review assumptions each year, generally in the third quarter, and revise these assumptions if appropriate. We consider our actual experience in current and past periods relative to our assumptions as part of our annual review.
ACMA in 2021 resulted in an increase of $74 million to reported net income, compared to a decrease of $143 million to reported net income in 2020.
(1)Assumption changes and management actions ("ACMA").
(2)Reflects the changes in estimated future payments for acquisition-related contingent considerations and options to purchase remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates.
(3)Refer to section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a reconciliation between reported net income and underlying net income.
(4)Prior year included an unfavourable adjustment relating to historical Canadian tax filings and lower tax-exempt investment income.
18 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Assumption Changes and Management Actions by Type
The following table sets out the impacts of ACMA on our reported net income in 2021.
| | | | | | | | | |
| As at December 31, 2021 | | |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | | Impacts on reported net income(1) | Comments |
| Mortality / morbidity | | 74 | Updates to reflect mortality/morbidity experience in all jurisdictions. |
Policyholder behaviour | | (174) | Updates to policyholder behaviour in all jurisdictions. The largest item was in U.S. In-force Management. |
| Expenses | | 159 | Updates to reflect expense experience and margins in all jurisdictions. The largest item was a reduction in expense margins. |
| Investment returns | | (47) | Updates to various investment-related assumptions across the Company. The largest items were a reduction to the best estimate real estate assumption in all jurisdictions, updates to the promulgated Ultimate Reinvestment Rate ("URR") and updates to the promulgated maximum net credit spreads. This was partially offset by increased investment in non-fixed assets in Canada Individual Insurance & Wealth and U.S. In-force Management. |
| Model enhancements and other | | 62 | Various enhancements and methodology changes across all jurisdictions. |
Total impacts on reported net income(2) | | 74 | |
(1)ACMA is included in reported net income and is presented as an adjustment to arrive at underlying net income.
(2)In this table, ACMA represents the shareholders' reported net income impacts (after-tax) including management actions. In Note 10.A of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements, the impacts of method and assumptions changes represents the change in shareholders' and participating policyholders' insurance contract liabilities net of reinsurance assets (pre-tax) and does not include management actions. Further information can be found in section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Additional information on estimates relating to our policyholder obligations, including the methodology and assumptions used in their determination, can be found in this MD&A under the section M - Accounting and Control Matters - 1 - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and in Note 10 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
3.Other adjustments
Other adjustments in 2021 decreased reported net income by $300 million, compared to $205 million in 2020, related to Asia, partially offset by Asset Management and Canada. In Asia, other adjustments related to a gain of $297 million on the IPO of ABSLAMC, our India joint venture. In Asset Management, other adjustments related to a $153 million increase in SLC Management’s acquisition-related liabilities. The increase reflects changes in estimated future payments for acquisition-related contingent considerations and options to purchase remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates. Higher fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards also contributed to the decrease in Asset Management. In Canada, other adjustments included an adjustment of investment income and expense allocations between participating policyholders and shareholders for prior years ("par allocation adjustment").
4.Experience-related items
In 2021, the notable experience-related items are as follows:
•Investing activity gains across the insurance businesses;
•Favourable credit experience in all insurance businesses, comprised of:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | 2021 | 2020 |
| Changes in ratings | 8 | | (138) | |
| Impairments, net of recoveries | (10) | | (28) | |
| Release of best estimate credit | 116 | | 109 | |
| Credit Experience | 114 | | (57) | |
•Unfavourable mortality experience related to COVID-19, of which $142 million was primarily impacting the working-age population in the U.S., and $60 million from our India joint ventures, the Philippines and Indonesia in Asia;
•Favourable morbidity experience in U.S. medical stop-loss, partially offset by disability in the U.S. and lower disability claims resolutions in Canada;
•Unfavourable policyholder behaviour experience reflecting small amounts in various products across the Company;
•Unfavourable expense experience related to higher compensation-related costs reflecting stronger earnings performance, VNB and Client measures; and
•Other experience was unfavourable in Corporate and Asia, partially offset by the U.S. and Canada, and was higher than the prior year. In the year, other experience included unfavourable results in our joint ventures in Asia, mainly driven by mortality in India, and project spend.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 19
5.Income taxes
Our statutory tax rate is normally impacted by various tax benefits, such as lower taxes on income subject to tax in foreign jurisdictions, a range of tax-exempt investment income, and other sustainable tax benefits.
In 2021, our effective tax rates on reported net income and underlying net income(1) were 14.3% and 13.5%, respectively, compared to 15.1% and 19.3%, respectively, in 2020. Our effective tax rate on underlying net income in 2021 is slightly below our expected range of 15% to 20%, primarily due to higher tax-exempt investment income and resolutions of prior year's tax matters. The effective tax rate on underlying net income in 2020 included an unfavourable adjustment relating to historical Canadian tax filings and lower tax-exempt investment income. For additional information, refer to Note 20 of our in 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
6.Impacts of foreign exchange translation
We have operations in many markets worldwide, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, India, China, Australia, Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia and Bermuda, and generate revenues and incur expenses in local currencies in these jurisdictions, which are translated to Canadian dollars.
Items impacting our Consolidated Statements of Operations are translated into Canadian dollars using average exchange rates for the respective period. For items impacting our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, period end rates are used for currency translation purposes.
The following table provides the foreign exchange rates for the U.S. dollar, which is our most significant impact of foreign exchange translation, over the past four quarters and two years.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exchange rate | Quarterly | Full year |
| Q4'21 | Q3'21 | Q2'21 | Q1'21 | 2021 | 2020 |
U.S. Dollar - Average | 1.260 | | 1.259 | | 1.229 | | 1.266 | | 1.254 | | 1.341 | |
| U.S. Dollar - Period end | 1.263 | | 1.268 | | 1.239 | | 1.256 | | 1.263 | | 1.273 | |
In general, our net income benefits from a weakening Canadian dollar and is adversely affected by a strengthening Canadian dollar as net income from the Company's international operations is translated back to Canadian dollars. Conversely, in a period of losses, the weakening of the Canadian dollar has the effect of increasing losses in foreign jurisdictions. The relative impacts of foreign exchange translation in any given period are driven by the movement of foreign exchange rates as well as the proportion of earnings generated in our foreign operations. We generally express the impacts of foreign exchange translation on net income on a year-over-year basis.
Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $177 million in reported net income and $164 million in underlying net income.
1. Sales and Value of New Business
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| ($ millions) | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
Insurance sales by business segment(1) | | | | | |
| Canada | | | | 852 | | 779 | |
| U.S. | | | | 1,564 | | 1,459 | |
| Asia | | | | 1,258 | | 1,263 | |
Total insurance sales(1) | | | | 3,674 | | 3,501 | |
Wealth sales by business segment(1) | | | | | |
Canada | | | | 19,854 | | 19,938 | |
| Asia | | | | 15,491 | | 10,937 | |
| Total wealth sales excluding Asset Management | | | | 35,345 | | 30,875 | |
Asset Management gross flows(1)(2) | | | | 193,063 | | 189,985 | |
Total wealth sales(2) | | | | 228,408 | | 220,860 | |
Value of New Business(1)(3) | | | | 1,346 | | 1,146 | |
(1)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(2)Effective January 1, 2021, the methodology for gross flows and outflows was updated for SLC Management. Prior period amounts have not been updated. For more details, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(3)Effective January 1, 2021, reflects a change in the timing of recognition of U.S. VNB for group policies. We have updated prior period amounts to reflect this change. For more details, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(1)Our effective income tax rate on underlying net income is calculated using underlying net income and income tax expense associated with underlying net income, which excludes amounts attributable to participating policyholders.
20 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Total Company insurance sales increased by $173 million ($329 million or 9%(1) excluding foreign exchange translation) in 2021 compared to 2020.
•Canada insurance sales increased by 9%, driven by higher individual participating whole life insurance sales, partially offset by lower large case group benefits sales in Sun Life Health.
•U.S. insurance sales increased by 13%(1), driven by growth in medical stop-loss and employee benefits sales.
•Asia insurance sales increased by 6%(1), driven by increases in Vietnam, India and the Philippines, partially offset by decreases in Hong Kong.
Total Company wealth sales increased by $7.5 billion ($21.4 billion or 10%(1) excluding foreign exchange translation) in 2021 compared to 2020.
•Canada wealth sales were in line with the prior year, as lower defined contribution sales in Group Retirement Services ("GRS") were offset by higher individual wealth mutual fund sales.
•Asia wealth sales increased by 51%(1), driven by higher sales in India, the Philippines and Hong Kong.
•Asset Management gross flows increased by 8%(1), as higher gross flows of managed funds in SLC Management were partially offset by lower gross flows of mutual funds in MFS.
VNB was $1,346 million in 2021, an increase of 17% compared to 2020, driven by higher sales across all business groups.
2. Assets Under Management
AUM consists of general funds, the investments for account of segregated fund holders ("segregated funds") and other AUM. Other AUM includes mutual funds and managed funds, which include institutional and other third-party assets managed by the Company.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | |
| ($ millions) | 2021 | | | | 2020 |
Assets under management(1)(2) | | | | | |
| General fund assets | 205,374 | | | | | 197,090 | |
| Segregated funds | 139,996 | | | | | 125,921 | |
Other assets under management(1)(2): | | | | | |
| Mutual funds | 553,943 | | | | | 487,407 | |
| Managed funds | 587,259 | | | | | 481,231 | |
| Consolidation adjustments and other | (41,844) | | | | | (35,640) | |
Total other AUM(1)(2) | 1,099,358 | | | | | 932,998 | |
Total assets under management(1)(2) | 1,444,728 | | | | | 1,256,009 | |
(1)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(2)Effective January 1, 2021, the methodology for AUM was updated for SLC Management with respect to certain real estate and investment-grade fixed income products to include uncalled capital commitments. We have updated prior period amounts to reflect this change. For more details, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
General fund assets increased by $8.3 billion or 4% as at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to:
(i)additional investments to support business growth of $10.8 billion; partially offset by
(ii)a decrease of $1.8 billion from the change in fair value through profit or loss ("FVTPL") on assets and liabilities; and
(iii)a decrease of $1.1 billion from the impacts of foreign exchange translation.
Segregated fund assets increased by $14.1 billion or 11% as at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020, driven by favourable market movements of $14.4 billion.
AUM increased by $188.7 billion or 15% as at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020, primarily driven by:
(i)favourable market movements on the value of mutual funds, managed funds and segregated funds of $131.2 billion;
(ii)an increase of $39.1 billion from the Crescent acquisition;
(iii)net inflows from mutual, managed and segregated funds of $26.3 billion; and
(iv)an increase in AUM of general fund assets of $8.3 billion; partially offset by
(v)a decrease of $6.8 billion from foreign exchange translation (excluding the impacts from general fund assets).
The net inflows of mutual, managed and segregated funds of $26.3 billion in 2021 was driven by net inflows in SLC Management of $32.5 billion and in Asia of $4.6 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $11.4 billion in MFS.
Mutual funds, managed funds and other AUM increased by $166.4 billion or 18% as at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020, driven by favourable market movements of $116.8 billion, AUM from the Crescent acquisition of $39.1 billion, net inflows of $25.8 billion, partially offset by foreign exchange translation of $6.3 billion.
(1)This percentage change excludes the impacts of foreign exchange translation. For more information about these non-IFRS financial measures, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| ($ millions, unless otherwise stated) | | | | | | 2021 | 2020 | | |
LICAT ratio(1) | | | | | | | | | |
Sun Life Financial Inc. | | | | | | 145 | % | 147 | % | | |
Sun Life Assurance | | | | | | 124 | % | 127 | % | | |
Financial leverage ratio(2)(3) | | | | | | 25.5 | % | 23.5 | % | | |
| Dividend | | | | | | | | | |
Underlying dividend payout ratio(2) | | | | | | 38 | % | 40 | % | | |
| Dividends per common share ($) | | | | | | 2.310 | | 2.200 | | | |
Capital | | | | | | | | | |
Subordinated debt(3) | | | | | | 6,425 | | 4,781 | | | |
Innovative capital instruments(4) | | | | | | 200 | | 200 | | | |
| Participating policyholders' equity | | | | | | 1,700 | | 1,368 | | | |
| Non-controlling interests | | | | | | 59 | | 25 | | | |
| Preferred shares and other equity instruments | | | | | | 2,239 | | 2,257 | | | |
Common shareholders' equity(5) | | | | | | 24,075 | | 22,212 | | | |
Total capital(3) | | | | | | 34,698 | | 30,843 | | | |
(1)Our LICAT ratios are calculated in accordance with OSFI-mandated guideline, Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test.
(2)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(3)Includes $2.0 billion of proceeds from the subordinated debt offerings completed in November 2021, of which $1.5 billion is subject to contractual terms requiring us to redeem the underlying securities, in full, if the closing of the DentaQuest acquisition does not occur. These amounts will not qualify as LICAT capital until the acquisition closes.
(4)Innovative capital instruments consist of SLEECS and qualify as regulatory capital. However, under IFRS they are reported as Senior debentures in our Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information, see section I - Capital and Liquidity Management - 1 - Capital in this document.
(5)Common shareholders’ equity is equal to Total shareholders’ equity less Preferred shares and other equity instruments.
Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions has developed the regulatory capital framework referred to as the Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test for Canada. LICAT measures the capital adequacy of an insurer using a risk-based approach and includes elements that contribute to financial strength through periods when an insurer is under stress as well as elements that contribute to policyholder and creditor protection wind-up.
SLF Inc. is a non-operating insurance company and is subject to the LICAT guideline. As at December 31, 2021, SLF Inc.'s LICAT ratio was 145%, 2% lower than December 31, 2020. The favourable impacts of reported net income, the issuance of $1 billion principal amount of other equity instruments, and net subordinated debt issuances were more than offset by dividend payments, preferred share redemptions, the ACB(1) bancassurance partnership in Vietnam, the PinnacleCare(2) acquisition and market movements.
Sun Life Assurance, SLF Inc.'s principal operating life insurance subsidiary, is also subject to the LICAT guideline. As at December 31, 2021, Sun Life Assurance's LICAT ratio was 124%, 3% lower than December 31, 2020. The favourable impacts of reported net income were more than offset by the ACB bancassurance partnership in Vietnam, dividends to SLF Inc., market movements and the smoothing impact of the interest rate scenario switch in North America for participating businesses.
The Sun Life Assurance LICAT ratios in both periods are well above OSFI's supervisory ratio of 100% and regulatory minimum ratio of 90%.
Capital
Our total capital consists of subordinated debt and other capital instruments, participating policyholders' equity and total shareholders' equity which includes common shareholders' equity, preferred shares and other equity instruments, and non-controlling interests. As at December 31, 2021, our total capital was $34.7 billion, an increase of $3.9 billion compared to December 31, 2020. The increase included reported net income of $3.9 billion, the issuance of $1 billion principal amount of other equity instruments, the issuance of Series 2021-1, Series 2021-2, and Series 2021-3 debentures, totaling $2.0 billion, all of which are detailed below. These were partially offset by the payment of $1.4 billion of dividends on common shares of SLF Inc. ("common shares"), the redemption of Class A Non-Cumulative Preferred Shares Series 1 and Series 2, and Series 12R, totaling $1.025 billion, and the redemption of $350 million Series 2016-1 debentures, all of which are also detailed below.
Our capital and liquidity positions remain strong with a LICAT ratio of 145% at SLF Inc., a financial leverage ratio of 25.5%(3)(4) and $4.7 billion in cash and other liquid assets(3)(4) as at December 31, 2021 in SLF Inc. (the ultimate parent company), and its wholly-owned holding companies ($3.1 billion as at December 31, 2020).
(1)Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank ("ACB").
(2)Pinnacle Care International, Inc. ("PinnacleCare"). For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2021.
(3)This is a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(4)Includes $2.0 billion of proceeds from the subordinated debt offerings completed in November 2021, of which $1.5 billion is subject to contractual terms requiring us to redeem the underlying securities, in full, if the closing of the DentaQuest acquisition does not occur. These amounts will not qualify as LICAT capital until the acquisition closes.
22 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Capital Transactions
On February 19, 2021, SLF Inc. redeemed all of the outstanding $350 million principal amount of Series 2016-1 Debentures. The redemption was funded from existing cash and other liquid assets.
On June 30, 2021, SLF Inc. issued $1 billion principal amount of 3.60% Limited Recourse Capital Notes Series 2021-1 ("LRCNs"). The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, which included investments in subsidiaries, repayment of indebtedness and other strategic investments.
On August 23, 2021, SLF Inc.'s Series E Senior Unsecured 4.57% Debentures ("Series E Debentures") matured and SLF Inc. redeemed all of its outstanding $300 million principal amount, including all accrued and outstanding interest. Under LICAT, senior debentures do not qualify as available capital, as a result, the repayment of the Series E Debentures had no impact on the LICAT ratio of Sun Life Assurance or SLF Inc. In addition, a separate pool of assets had been set aside to support the redemption of these debentures. As such, the redemption did not affect the cash and other liquid assets held by SLF Inc. and its wholly-owned holding companies noted above.
On September 29, 2021, SLF Inc. redeemed all of the $400 million Class A Non-Cumulative Preferred Shares Series 1 issued by SLF Inc. on February 25, 2005 and all of the $325 million Class A Non-Cumulative Preferred Shares Series 2 issued by SLF Inc. on July 15, 2005, in accordance with the terms attached to the two series of preferred shares. The redemptions were funded from existing cash and other liquid assets in SLF Inc.
On September 30, 2021, 0.5 million of the 6.9 million Class A Non-cumulative Rate Reset Preferred Shares Series 10R (the "Series 10R Shares") were converted into Class A Non-cumulative Floating Rate Preferred Shares 11QR (the "Series 11QR Shares") on a one-for-one basis and 0.4 million of the 1.1 million Series 11QR were converted into Series 10R on a one-for-one basis. Upon completion of the conversion, approximately 6.8 million Series 10R Shares and 1.2 million Series 11QR Shares were issued and outstanding in SLF Inc.
On November 18, 2021, SLF Inc. issued $500 million principal amount of Series 2021-1 Subordinated Unsecured 2.46% Fixed/Floating Debentures due 2031 (the "Series 2021-1 Debentures"), $1 billion principal amount of Series 2021-2 Subordinated Unsecured 2.80% Fixed/Floating Debentures due 2033 (the "Series 2021-2 Debentures"), and $500 million principal amount of Series 2021-3 Subordinated Unsecured 3.15% Fixed/Floating Debentures due 2036 (the "Series 2021-3 Debentures"). The net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include funding a portion of the purchase price for the DentaQuest acquisition, investments in subsidiaries, repayment of indebtedness and other strategic investments.
The Company will be required to redeem the Series 2021-2 Debentures and the Series 2021-3 Debentures in full at a redemption price equal to par, together with accrued and unpaid interest up to but excluding the date fixed for redemption if either (i) the closing of the acquisition of DentaQuest Group, Inc. has not occurred on or prior to October 3, 2022 (or such later date as extended pursuant to the acquisition agreement relating to the acquisition of DentaQuest Group, Inc.) (the “Outside Date”) or (ii) such acquisition agreement is terminated at any time prior to the Outside Date in accordance with its terms without closing of the acquisition of DentaQuest Group, Inc.
On December 31, 2021, SLF Inc. redeemed all of the $300 million principal amount of Class A Non-Cumulative Rate Reset Preferred Shares Series 12R (the "Series 12R Shares") issued by SLF Inc. on November 10, 2011, in accordance with the terms attached to the series of preferred shares. The redemption was funded from existing cash and other liquid assets in SLF Inc.
Financial Strength Ratings
Independent rating agencies assign credit ratings to securities issued by companies and assign financial strength ratings to financial institutions such as Sun Life Assurance.
The financial strength ratings assigned by rating agencies are intended to provide an independent view of the creditworthiness and financial strength of a financial institution. Each rating agency has developed its own methodology for the assessment and subsequent rating of life insurance companies.
Rating agencies do not assign a financial strength rating for SLF Inc., however, credit ratings are assigned to the securities issued by SLF Inc. and its subsidiaries and are described in SLF Inc.'s AIF under the heading Security Ratings.
The following table summarizes the financial strength ratings for Sun Life Assurance as at January 31, 2022 and January 31, 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| A.M. Best | DBRS | Moody's | Standard & Poor's |
| January 31, 2022 | A+ | AA | Aa3 | AA |
| January 31, 2021 | A+ | AA | Aa3 | AA |
Most recent rating agency actions on the financial strength rating of Sun Life Assurance:
•April 27, 2021 - Standard and Poor's ("S&P") affirmed the financial strength rating with a stable outlook.
•April 1, 2021 - Moody's affirmed the financial strength rating with a stable outlook.
•October 29, 2021 - DBRS affirmed the financial strength rating with a stable outlook.
•January 28, 2022 - A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength rating with a stable outlook.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 23
| | | | | |
| G. Performance by Business Segment | |
Sun Life's business is well-diversified across geographies and business types, supported by our four pillar strategy and diversified offerings of wealth and insurance products.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| ($ millions) | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | | | | | |
| Canada | | | | 1,558 | | 717 | |
| U.S. | | | | 499 | | 257 | |
| Asset Management | | | | 892 | | 980 | |
| Asia | | | | 1,075 | | 594 | |
| Corporate | | | | (90) | | (144) | |
| Total reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | | | | 3,934 | | 2,404 | |
Underlying net income (loss)(1) | | | | | |
| Canada | | | | 1,131 | | 1,073 | |
| U.S. | | | | 518 | | 568 | |
| Asset Management | | | | 1,346 | | 1,128 | |
| Asia | | | | 586 | | 579 | |
| Corporate | | | | (48) | | (135) | |
Total underlying net income (loss)(1) | | | | 3,533 | | 3,213 | |
(1)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
All factors discussed in this document that impact our underlying net income are also applicable to reported net income.
1. Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Our Canada business segment is a leading provider of protection, health, asset management and wealth solutions, providing products and services that deliver value to over 6.6 million Clients. We are the largest provider of benefits and pensions in the workplace, and offer a wide range of products to individuals via retail channels. We are focused on helping Canadians achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Business Units |
| • Individual Insurance & Wealth | • Group Retirement Services | • Sun Life Health |
2021 Highlights
Growing our businesses with the continued focus on helping Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives
•During the year, we announced the creation of our Sun Life Health. This new business unit brings Group Benefits and Lumino Health together, linking the strength of our overall health offering to Clients, including our core insurance solutions. We leveraged our market leadership position in group benefits(1), with over $11.8 billion of business-in-force, to proactively advance a greater focus on mental health in workplaces across Canada, including engaging with market and industry leaders to take meaningful action and investing in workplace mental health resources. We launched our Sun Life Health Mental Health Coach to support Clients' mental health journeys with personalized treatment options, virtual tools for ongoing care and diversifying providers available on our digital platforms.
•Maintained our #1 position in the group retirement market(2) with over $141 billion assets under administration. In our pension risk transfer business, Defined Benefit Solutions, we completed $2.3 billion in sales, helping Canadian employers reduce their pension risk and provide long-term protection for their retirees. Additionally, we took industry-leading action on sustainable investing by deploying a digital Plan Sponsor Sustainability Playbook that ensures members are informed of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors within their plans.
•Upheld our leadership position in individual insurance(3) by enhancing our products and services, while growing advisor relationships across the market. We made it easier for Clients to get the coverage they need by augmenting our predictive underwriting models with the help of advanced data and analytics, allowing Clients aged 18 to 40 to qualify for up to $5 million in life insurance coverage without the need for lab exams.
•Continued individual wealth momentum by launching our Investment GIF eApp, enabling Clients and third-party advisors to process investment applications digitally, streamlining the Client experience. In addition, we grew Sun Life Global Investments ("SLGI") assets under management to $38 billion and increased net flows by 73% compared to 2020, supported by the launch of a sustainable infrastructure fund.
•SLGI Asset Management Inc. joined the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, committing to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. We are doing our part to provide Clients with access to sustainable investments, allowing us to build on our commitment to invest in strategies that drive long-term sustainable outcomes while helping Clients build wealth and secure their financial future.
(1)Based on revenue for year ended December 2020 from 2021 Group Benefits Provider Report.
(2)Fraser Pension Universe Report (based on year-ended December 2020).
(3)LIMRA Market Share as of third quarter 2021 year-to-date.
24 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Putting Client Impact at the centre of everything we do when developing new business models
•Enhanced Client value and positive outcomes by providing every Client with personalized financial tools that will enable them to set, track, and continuously adjust personal goals across all our wealth and insurance platforms.
•Our digital coach, Ella, proactively connected with Clients over 20 million times throughout the year, supporting our Clients during moments that matter and assisting them with an additional $690 million in wealth deposits and $950 million in insurance coverage.
•Made it easier for our Clients to do business with us by digitally processing 93% of retail insurance applications, 83% of retail wealth transactions and 96% of group benefits health and dental claims, throughout the year.
•Our Canadian mobile app, my Sun Life, continued to be recognized as a highly rated digital platform that delivered exceptional Client experiences, maintaining a 4.0+ overall user rating since its inception(1), and unique users grew by 12% in 2021.
•Introduced the new Lumino Health [provider search] mobile app that makes it easier for Canadians to book appointments with paramedical providers, which empowers Clients and their families to live healthier lives and also deepens our Clients' relationships with the Lumino Health website, helping us reach over 1.6 million visitors.
Strategy and Outlook
Canada is a growth market for Sun Life. Our unique ability to address protection, health, asset management and wealth holistically is what sets us apart in the market. We will continue to shape the market and deliver on our Purpose through an integrated approach that addresses unmet Client needs across all stages of their health and wealth journeys. We continue to be focused on our Purpose of helping Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives, achieving our strategic ambitions, and further market differentiation, all of which will be enabled by ensuring seamless and personalized Client experiences, fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace, and embedding sustainability throughout our operations.
Our focus for the Canadian businesses will be to:
Put Client Impact at the centre of everything we do, driving positive financial and health actions and outcomes
•Equip every Client with a personalized financial plan, leveraging the strength of our diversified products and services to deliver a One Sun Life Client experience and provide a holistic and tailored offering.
•Empower Clients to build and secure their financial future through our growing asset management product and services offering, driving long-term Client investment returns and sustainable outcomes.
•Continue to educate and equip our Clients with tools to understand their sustainable investment choices and enable Clients, plan sponsors, and advisors to create measurable impact through their investments.
•Incorporate sustainability into our culture and decision making to deliver a positive social impact, increase Client and employee engagement, and drive market differentiation.
•Bring innovative solutions to market that address major health concerns in Canada, enabling Clients with existing health challenges to gain access to insurance cost-effectively, while helping them manage their health.
Shape the market and drive growth
•With the creation of our Sun Life Health business, we will empower Canadians with the support they need throughout their health journey to take action earlier, helping prevent and mitigate health risks. By leveraging our relationships with millions of group benefits Clients, we will strengthen our health offering to Clients, by building on the momentum of our digital health platform, Lumino Health.
•Continue to mobilize action on Canada’s mental health crisis by leading company executives across the country to act within their workplaces, and inspiring Canadians to take actions that support their mental health.
•Capture the growing decumulation opportunity and be the retirement income provider of choice, by leveraging our worksite advantage and building seamless planning and asset consolidation capabilities, enabling Clients to benefit from a unified experience.
•Extend our leadership in the growing Canadian pension risk transfer market, assisting employers in managing and de-risking their defined benefit pension plans.
•Advance our distribution and product capabilities to continue to scale and accelerate SLGI as a growth engine within Canada, empowering Clients with more convenient access to investment solutions and a holistic product suite to meet their asset management needs.
Think and act like a digital company
•Transform and digitize all aspects of the Client, advisor and plan sponsor journeys, with process enhancements and innovative data and analytic capabilities, enabling deeper personalization for our Clients.
•Continue to augment predictive underwriting models, utilizing advanced data analytics and predictive modelling to enhance our Client experience with easier access to products, while minimizing underwriting risk.
•Build and scale an omni-channel advice and service model to meet all Client needs and expand our reach in the market, combining face-to-face advisors and a best-in-class digital platform to offer Clients flexibility to move across channels seamlessly, including direct access through self-serve platforms and capabilities.
•Expand our Client reach and engagement, delivering proactive and personalized interactions to help our Clients achieve their health and financial goals.
•Develop and grow our digital business platforms, including my Sun Life, making it easier and more convenient for our Clients to access the resources they need.
(1)Achieved 4.0 or above overall annual user rating on both Apple App Store and Google Play Store, since its inception in 2011.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 25
Outlook
Client expectations across all cohorts are rapidly changing, driving higher demand for personalized experiences that are aligned with their needs, while being quicker and seamless. In addition, evolving mental, physical and sociological needs across the Canadian population is increasing the need to provide tailored solutions within the health market. We continue to embrace these changes and evolve our diversified business model in response to the shifting Canadian market, by accelerating key investments and expanding our Client offerings, while maintaining strong financial, risk and capital management practices.
Financial security and health are two primary preoccupations for Canadians. It drives the need for asset and wealth management, as well as life and health protection, while presenting opportunities for integrated solutions. Each individual’s needs vary as they progress through different life stages, requiring diverse offerings, holistic advice and a personalized, evolving plan throughout their wealth and health journeys. Accumulation and decumulation of wealth remains top of mind as Clients seek investment options with financial returns aligned with their goals.
In addition, while Canadians continue to live longer and desire digital health experiences, the impact and instances of mental health continues to be more prevalent than ever. We recognize the need to expand our role to provide support for Canadians’ health and well-being. This includes our focus on mental health and improving health outcomes through solutions that will ensure our Clients have the resources and support available to develop and maintain a positive mental health environment.
| | | | | | | | |
| Business | Description | Market position |
| Individual Insurance & Wealth | • Provides holistic advice to individuals to help them and their families achieve lifetime financial security, and live healthier lives, leveraging a broad suite of life and health insurance and investment products. • Products distributed via multi-channel distribution model consisting of the SLFD network(1), third-party channels, including independent brokers and broker-dealers, and direct-to-consumer. | • 1st place market position by premiums within the individual life and health market and 2nd place for Individual Critical Illness Insurance based on premiums(2). • 1st in fixed product sales(2) and 4th place market position by total wealth deposits and premiums(2). |
| Sun Life Health | • In 2021, we announced the creation of Sun Life Health business. This new business unit brings Group Benefits and Lumino Health together. Sun Life Health will provide Clients with personalized and on-demand digital health experiences that will empower them to take action on their health earlier, ultimately improving their health outcomes. • Provides group insurance products in Canada, including life, dental, extended health care, disability and critical illness, to employers of all sizes. • Leverages our worksite advantage to offer voluntary benefits solutions to individual plan members, including post-employment life and health plans. • Products distributed by sales representatives in collaboration with independent advisors, benefits consultants and the SLFD. | • 1st place group benefits provider in Canada for the 9th consecutive year(3). |
| Group Retirement Services | • Provides defined contribution pension plans and defined benefit solutions in Canada to employers of all sizes. • Leverages our worksite advantage to offer voluntary savings plans, including post-employment plans, to those members exiting their employer-sponsored plans. • Defined Benefit Solutions offers an expanding range of innovative de-risking solutions for defined benefit pension plans. • Products distributed by sales representatives in collaboration with a multi-channel distribution network of pension consultants and advisors. • Planning and asset consolidation capabilities for current and former plan members to benefit from a simplified and seamless experience with a single provider. | • Ranked 1st in the defined contribution market based on total Capital Accumulation Plan assets for the 19th consecutive year(4). • Ranked 1st in the defined benefit solutions annuity market(2). |
(1)Sun Life Financial Distribution ("SLFD") is our proprietary career advisory network.
(2)LIMRA Market Share as of third quarter 2021, on a year-to-date basis.
(3)Based on revenue for year ended December 2020 from 2021 Group Benefits Provider Report.
(4)Fraser Pension Universe Report (based on year-ended December 2020).
26 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Financial and Business Results
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| ($ millions) | | | | 2021 | 2020 | |
| Individual Insurance & Wealth | | | | 911 | | 36 | |
Sun Life Health(1) | | | | 271 | | 422 | |
| Group Retirement Services | | | | 376 | | 259 | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | 1,558 | | 717 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(2) | | | | 474 | | (392) | |
Assumption changes and management actions(2) | | | | 40 | | 32 | |
Other(2)(3) | | | | (87) | | 4 | |
Underlying net income(4) | | | | 1,131 | | 1,073 | |
Reported ROE (%)(4) | | | | 19.8 | % | 9.8 | % |
Underlying ROE (%)(4) | | | | 14.4 | % | 14.7 | % |
Insurance sales(4) | | | | 852 | | 779 | |
Wealth sales(4) | | | | 19,854 | | 19,938 | |
(1)Effective Q4 2021, we began reporting on the performance and results of Sun Life Health, which brings our Group Benefits business and Lumino Health platform together.
(2)Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment, including pre-tax adjustments.
(3)Other adjustments to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure include other items that are unusual or exceptional in nature. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(4)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Profitability
In 2021, Canada's reported net income of $1,558 million increased $841 million or 117.3% compared to 2020, driven by favourable market-related impacts. Underlying net income of $1,131 million increased $58 million or 5%, driven by business growth, partially offset by experience-related items and an investment impairment in earnings on surplus. Experience in the year included favourable credit, investing activity gains, and favourable mortality. These factors were partially offset by unfavourable morbidity reflecting lower disability claims resolutions, while pricing actions were in line with higher disability claims volumes. Unfavourable expense experience also contributed to the offset.
Growth
Canada insurance sales increased by $73 million or 9% in 2021 compared to 2020. Individual insurance sales were $489 million, an increase of $131 million or 37%, driven by higher participating whole life insurance sales. Sun Life Health sales were $363 million, a decrease of $57 million or 14%, reflecting lower large case group benefits sales.
Canada wealth sales were in line with the prior year. Individual wealth sales were $9.0 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion or 20%, driven by higher mutual fund sales. GRS sales were $10.9 billion, a decrease of $1.6 billion or 13%, reflecting lower defined contribution sales and retained business, partially offset by increased asset consolidations and rollovers.
AUM for our wealth businesses, including GRS, was $165.2 billion as at December 31, 2021, an increase of $14.4 billion or 9.5% compared to December 31, 2020, driven by improved markets and net inflows.
Profitability and Growth by Business Unit
Individual Insurance & Wealth
Individual Insurance & Wealth's reported net income of $911 million increased $875 million in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by favourable market-related and ACMA impacts, favourable credit experience and business growth, partially offset by lower investing activity and a par allocation adjustment.
Individual life and health insurance product sales were $489 million in 2021, an increase of $131 million or 37% compared to 2020. As noted above, the increase was driven by higher participating whole life insurance sales. Individual wealth product sales were $9.0 billion in 2021, an increase of $1.5 billion or 20% compared to 2020, driven by higher mutual fund sales.
Sun Life Health
Sun Life Health's reported net income of $271 million decreased $151 million or 36% in 2021 compared to 2020, reflecting unfavourable ACMA impacts and morbidity experience, partially offset by improved expense experience and business growth.
Sun Life Health sales were $363 million in 2021, a decrease of $57 million or 14% compared to 2020, reflecting lower large case group benefits sales.
Group Retirement Services
GRS's reported net income of $376 million increased $117 million or 45% in 2021, compared to 2020, driven by favourable credit experience, business growth and favourable market-related impacts.
GRS sales were $10.9 billion in 2021, a decrease of $1.6 billion or 13% in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by lower defined contribution sales and retained business, partially offset by increased asset consolidations and rollovers. Assets under administration was $142.1 billion as at December 31, 2021, an increase of $16.2 billion or 13% compared to December 31, 2020, driven by improved market movement and net inflows.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 27
2. U.S.
| | | | | | | | |
| Our U.S. business group is one of the largest group benefits providers in the U.S. market, serving employees and their families at more than 55,000 workplaces of all sizes across the country with employer-sponsored insurance products and solutions. In addition, our U.S. business manages an in-force block of more than 90,000 individual life insurance policies. |
| | | | | |
| Business Units |
| • Group Benefits | • In-force Management |
2021 Highlights
Helping Clients improve health outcomes and get the coverage they need
•Introduced Health Navigator powered by PinnacleCare, a unique medical stop-loss platform that guides members through the complex U.S. health-care system. Health Navigator helps Clients get the right care to create better health outcomes and experiences, while reducing costs.
•Launched Stitch in select states, an innovative supplemental health offering that members can buy directly from Sun Life online or via mobile any time of year without the need for employer administration. Stitch also helps protect part-time and gig workers, who are not typically eligible for employee benefits.
•Increased the number of employees covered on the Sun Life + Maxwell Health platform by 70% compared to the prior year, contributing to a 4% increase in employee benefits sales.
•Broadened the FullscopeRMS portfolio with a supplemental health offering to help more Clients cover out-of-pocket costs resulting from treatment for health conditions.
•In-force Management paid the highest amount of claims in its history at more than US$1 billion, continuing to help Clients at a time they needed it most.
Growing our business
•Sales reached another new high, growing by 13% to US$1.2 billion compared to strong performance in 2020, driven by growth in both medical stop-loss and employee benefits reflecting continued demand for our digital and virtual capabilities.
•On July 1, 2021, Sun Life completed its acquisition of Pinnacle Care International, Inc, which joined our U.S. medical stop-loss business. PinnacleCare provides leading health care navigation and medical intelligence services improving the employee experience when facing a serious medical condition.
•Added new FullscopeRMS partners for our Disability, Life, Absence, Stop-Loss, and Supplemental Health products. Momentum continued in the new Absence offering where the number of members covered grew from 36,000 to 114,000 in 2021.
•On October 3, 2021, we entered into an agreement to acquire DentaQuest Group, Inc. ("DentaQuest"), the largest provider of Medicaid dental benefits in the U.S., with a growing presence in Medicare Advantage and commercial products, serving more than 33 million members overall. The acquisition of DentaQuest aligns to our business strategy of being a leader in health and group benefits, while contributing to our emphasis on fee-based earnings and businesses which generate higher ROE.
Thinking and acting like a digital company
•Launched our new absence management solution, simplifying the administration of paid and unpaid leaves by providing members an intuitive experience with state-of-the-art technology, faster decisions and payments. Digital enhancements have made filing claims easier and more efficient, with online submissions up significantly compared to last year.
•Expanded our absence management offering with AbsenceTech BundleSM, a cost-effective solution for smaller, self-administered employers, providing access to a digital self-administration absence technology platform with support from Sun Life experts.
•Expanded our digital connectivity capabilities and launched Sun Life Link, a broad portfolio of connection solutions including Application programming interfaces ("APIs") with prominent human capital management and benefits administration systems. These connections alleviate manual administrative tasks for HR professionals, automate processes, and improve accuracy for HR administrators, while generating faster decisions and real-time notifications for employees.
•Continued to leverage our industry-leading medical stop-loss Clinical 360 program that analyzes claim and clinical data for opportunities to reduce costs for employers and members, saving Sun Life and our Clients US$25 million in 2021.
•Launched Sun Life Onboard, a stream-lined digital process that reduces the administrative time for new Clients, getting them onboarded in a faster, more seamless way.
Strategy and Outlook
Sun Life is part of the large, complex, and rapidly changing U.S. benefits ecosystem. With health-care costs continuing to rise, employees are becoming more responsible for health and benefits costs. Meanwhile, many Americans are underinsured for key financial risks without sufficient life or disability insurance.
Our strategy is centred on being a leader in health and benefits in the U.S. We are focused on helping Clients improve health outcomes and reduce costs, delivering tools that make it easier to do business with us, and helping members close coverage gaps. We are committed to diversity, equity and inclusion in our workforce and support a future of work built on flexible work styles. This will help us continue to increase employee engagement and attract and retain top talent to meet and exceed the needs of our Clients. We remain committed to being a business known for doing the right thing, guided by our Purpose of helping Clients live healthier lives by getting them the right care at the right time at the right cost.
Help Clients improve health outcomes, experiences and costs
•Help Clients navigate the complex health care system, get the care they need, and influence health outcomes.
•Continue to provide industry-leading medical stop-loss expertise and innovative risk management solutions to help self-funded employers and health plans solve for rising health care costs.
•Leverage our data and analytics capabilities to identify opportunities and new solutions to help employers and their employees reduce health care costs and improve health outcomes.
28 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Be a digital leader, enhancing the digital experience and make it easier to do business with us
•Expand our ability to integrate with other major platforms in the health and benefits ecosystem, delivering an automated and more efficient Client experience.
•Drive digital expansion through new capabilities and partnerships while leveraging existing assets to deliver predictive and personalized analytics to help members make decisions that are right for them.
•Leverage digital tools to increase Client interactions and elevate content to drive sales and virtual engagement, enhancing selling effectiveness and delivering deeper insights for brokers and employers.
Help members close coverage gaps and select the right benefits
•Continue to help members optimize the coverage they need through clear benefits communication, simple product packages, and excellent enrollment support.
•Grow our national accounts business with a focus on our expanded supplemental health and voluntary offerings and our integrated disability and absence claims management process, helping employers comply with complex regulations and giving more Americans access to paid leave.
•Drive more growth in FullscopeRMS by leveraging the recently expanded suite of turnkey solutions for insurance company and health plan partners.
Help In-force Management policy-owners achieve lifetime financial security, while effectively managing our operations
•Continue to provide excellent service to our over 90,000 individual insurance policy-owners.
•Optimize the value of the business by implementing opportunities to improve profitability, including expense efficiencies and alternative investment strategies.
•Effectively manage risk and capital through reinsurance and via product offerings for converting or maturing policies.
Outlook
The pandemic continues to impact the U.S. group benefits industry, especially as COVID-19-related deaths in the working-age population increased significantly in the second half of 2021. Our diversified business model has supported our performance throughout the pandemic, as strong medical stop-loss and In-force Management results offset unfavorable COVID-19 impacts in our employee benefits business. It is difficult to predict the direct and indirect impacts of the pandemic going forward, but we continue to be here for our Clients in the moments that matter most, paying more than $300 million in claims to families impacted by COVID-19 in 2021.
The U.S. health and employee benefits ecosystem is large and growing with Clients becoming increasingly aware of the value of our products and services. These markets remain competitive, but we are committed to growing profitably by leveraging our leadership position, deep expertise, and new capabilities to extend further into the health services space. With our acquisition of PinnacleCare and plan to acquire DentaQuest, more than 70% of our active U.S. business will be in health care products and services. We expect to close the DentaQuest acquisition during the first half of 2022.
We have advocated for and collaborated with members of Congress to encourage the passage of a Federal Paid Family and Medical Leave program. If enacted, the proposal we support would expand coverage to all Americans, and give employers the flexibility to provide these benefits through insurers. We continue to monitor other possible legislative changes to key areas impacting our business, including federal data security and privacy legislation, modifications to the Affordable Care Act, and changes to corporate tax rates.
| | | | | | | | |
| Business | Description | Market position |
| Group Benefits | • Provides group insurance products and services, including life, long-term and short-term disability, absence management, medical stop-loss, dental, vision, voluntary and supplemental health insurance such as hospital indemnity, accident and critical illness. • Stop-loss insurance provides employers who self-insure their employee health plans with protection against large claims. • Products distributed through more than 32,000 independent brokers and benefits consultants, supported by approximately 175 employed sales representatives. • Serves more than 55,000 employers in small, medium and large workplaces across the U.S. • FullscopeRMS, provides turnkey solutions for disability, absence management, stop-loss and supplemental health coverages and capabilities including underwriting services, claims administration, product development, actuarial and policy administration. | •Largest independent medical stop-loss provider(1). • Largest turnkey disability provider(2) • One of the largest preferred. provider organization ("PPO") dental networks with 130,000 unique dentists(3). • Top ten group life and disability benefits provider(4).
|
| In-force Management | • Provides more than 90,000 individual life insurance policies, primarily universal life and participating whole life insurance. | |
(1) Ranking compiled by Sun Life based on data contained in the 2020 Accident and Health Policy Experience Report from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC"). An independent stop-loss carrier is defined as a stop-loss carrier that does not also sell medical claim administration services.
(2) Based on annual 2020 NAIC Accident and Health Policy Experience Report and DRMS market expertise.
(3) Based on unique dentist count from Zelis Network Analytics data as of September 2020. Nationwide counts are state level totals.
(4) Based on LIMRA 2020 Annual U.S. Sales & In-Force Reports for group term life, group short-term disability, and long-term disability insurance.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 29
Financial and Business Results
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| (US$ millions) | | | | 2021 | | 2020 | |
| Group Benefits | | | | 247 | | 331 | |
| In-force Management | | | | 152 | | (140) | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | 399 | | 191 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | | | | 74 | | 6 | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | | | | (80) | | (236) | |
Acquisition, integration and restructuring(1) | | | | (8) | | (4) | |
Underlying net income(2) | | | | 413 | | 425 | |
Reported ROE (%)(2) | | | | 13.6 | % | 6.9 | % |
Underlying ROE (%)(2) | | | | 14.0 | % | 15.3 | % |
After-tax profit margin for Group Benefits (%)(2)(3) | | | | 5.7 | % | 8.0 | % |
Insurance sales(2) | | | | 1,244 | | 1,102 | |
| (C$ millions) | | | | | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | 499 | | 257 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | | | | 93 | | 8 | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | | | | (101) | | (313) | |
Acquisition, integration and restructuring(1) | | | | (11) | | (6) | |
Underlying net income(2) | | | | 518 | | 568 | |
(1)Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment, including pre-tax amounts.
(2)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(3)Based on underlying net income, on a trailing four-quarter basis. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Profitability
In 2021, U.S's reported net income of US$399 million increased US$208 million compared to the same period in 2020, driven by ACMA impacts largely pertaining to In-force Management and an increase in the value of our real estate investments. Underlying net income decreased US$12 million or 3%, reflecting US$105 million(1) primarily from elevated COVID-19 impacts on the working-age population. In addition, experience in the year included investing activity gains and favourable credit, partially offset by unfavourable expense experience. Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $42 million in reported net income and $40 million in underlying net income.
The trailing four-quarter after-tax profit margin for Group Benefits was 5.7% as of the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to 8.0% as of the fourth quarter of 2020.
Growth
U.S. insurance sales increased by US$142 million or 13% in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by growth in medical stop-loss and employee benefits sales.
Acquisition of PinnacleCare
On July 1, 2021, we completed the acquisition of PinnacleCare, a leading U.S. health care navigation and medical intelligence provider, for $110 million (US$85 million). PinnacleCare joins our U.S. Group Benefits business in the medical stop-loss organization, the largest independent medical stop-loss provider in the country. The acquisition expands our medical stop-loss business beyond the traditional model that reimburses employers after care has occurred, to one that engages employees at diagnosis to help improve the entire care experience and outcomes for both the employee and employer. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2021.
Profitability by Business Unit
Group Benefits
Group Benefits' reported net income of US$247 million decreased US$84 million or 25% in 2021 compared to 2020, reflecting unfavourable mortality in employee benefits and unfavourable ACMA impacts. Morbidity was in line with the prior year, as the favourable impact in medical stop-loss was largely offset by employee benefits.
In-force Management
In-force Management's reported net income of US$152 million increased US$292 million in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by less unfavourable ACMA, and favourable market-related impacts and mortality.
(1)$135 million in Canadian dollars.
30 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
3. Asset Management
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Our Asset Management business group is comprised of MFS and SLC Management. MFS is a premier global asset manager which offers a comprehensive selection of financial products and services that deliver superior value and actively manages assets for retail and institutional investors around the world. SLC Management is a global institutional asset manager with capabilities across public and private credit, fixed income, real estate and infrastructure. |
| | | | | | | | |
| Business Units |
| • MFS Investment Management | • SLC Management |
2021 Highlights
•We ended 2021 with $1.06 trillion in assets under management consisting of $875.2 billion (US$692.8 billion) from MFS and $183.9 billion from SLC Management.
MFS
•MFS generated record high ANA, revenues and net income during 2021.
•2021 marked the third straight year where MFS posted net retail inflows in every quarter.
•Delivered strong long-term investment performance with 97%, 96%, and 80% of MFS's U.S. retail mutual fund assets ranked in the top half of their Morningstar categories based on ten-, five- and three-year performance, respectively, as at December 31, 2021.
•MFS joined the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative, a global group of asset managers committed to supporting the goal of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, or sooner, by working with their clients across their portfolios.
•Sustained a strong pre-tax net operating profit margin ratio for MFS of 41%, up from 39% in 2020.
SLC Management
•On January 5, 2021, we completed the acquisition of a majority stake in Crescent Capital Group, a global alternative credit investment manager, forming the alternative credit investing pillar of SLC Management. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements.
•SLC Management achieved net flows of $33 billion through strong capital raising across all of our affiliate managers, capitalizing the momentum of investor demand across a broad range of asset classes, products and geographies, demonstrating the breadth and diversity of the platform.
◦Of the record capital raised in 2021, Crescent Capital Group produced over a third as it executed on capital raises in two flagship funds, while BGO achieved an over 40% increase in capital raising relative to 2020.
◦There are opportunities to offer the entire product shelf to our Clients and we have made tangible progress in cross-selling, particularly to our Fixed Income Clients.
◦SLC Management achieved a record AUM of $184 billion; excluding the Crescent Capital acquisition, AUM was up 19% compared to the prior year.
•We continued to build on our commitment to sustainable investing:
◦Our affiliate managers, InfraRed and BGO joined the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, pledging to achieve net-zero emissions for their portfolios by 2050.
◦Added global ESG expertise to its diverse investment platform through the appointment of a Global Head of ESG.
Strategy and Outlook
Our strategy is to provide investment products through MFS and SLC Management that will deliver growth in active asset management as well as LDI and alternative asset classes. MFS competes primarily in the global institutional, U.S. retail and select non-U.S. retail markets. SLC Management leverages Sun Life’s long-standing expertise in LDI and private asset class investments, augmented by the specialized alternative capabilities of SLC Management's affiliate managers, to offer customized investment solutions to institutional investors.
MFS: Continue to deliver superior investment performance while allocating capital responsibly for our Clients
MFS's active management strategy focuses on delivering value to our Clients over the long term. Our relative performance puts us in a strong competitive position over other asset managers:
•With increasing market volatility and a successful track record, MFS is well-positioned to attract flows from all Client sectors that are seeking risk-managed capital appreciation over the long term based on our disciplined, long-term approach. We are engaging Clients to align with MFS to focus on longer investment horizons, to leverage our proven ability to deliver over benchmark performance through a market cycle.
•Our strong leadership on ESG is embedded in our overall investment approach of allocating capital responsibly on behalf of our Clients.
•Our continued strategic focus to build out institutional fixed income product and sales capabilities and broaden our non-U.S. retail initiatives enables us to meet Clients' unique and local needs. As COVID-19 restrictions on travel lift, we will be able to make more in-person visits with new and prospective clients to better present our capabilities.
•MFS strives to maintain margins in the top quartile of active managers while maintaining our commitment to provide long-term value to Clients.
•Continue to focus on diversity at all levels and promoting an inclusive culture.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 31
SLC Management: Help investors meet their investment objectives by offering a broad suite of alternative asset classes and fixed income strategies
We are well-positioned to take advantage of key trends in our target markets:
•Growing demand for alternative investments due to low nominal interest rates
•An increasing focus by investors on ESG and sustainability issues
•Outsourcing of asset management by insurance companies, and
•Consolidation of investment manager relationships by institutional investors.
Our strategy is to continue to deliver superior investment performance, expand and deepen our distribution relationships and build out our product lineup. SLC Management is positioned for growth over the medium-term and aligned with our objectives(1) to achieve AUM of $225 billion, operating margin of 30%-35%, and underlying net income of $225 million by 2025. We offer our Clients a compelling suite of investment capabilities to meet their needs, including:
•Leading public and private fixed income capabilities, spanning both investment grade and alternative credit
•Global real estate expertise across both equity and debt and
•Global infrastructure capabilities.
Outlook
MFS
We continued to see consolidation in the asset management industry as changes are driving clients and platforms to consolidate assets into fewer investment firms. Within this context, we believe that we have the scale, proven long-term track records and broad product portfolios to take advantage of this opportunity to gain market share. Active asset managers continue face headwinds from passive investment products and downward pressure on fees. To address these headwinds, we will continue to grow our retail business outside the U.S and to diversify our global business with fixed income products. Outside the U.S., we are looking to build local infrastructure with in-country resources, incorporating local language websites and sales materials, as well as partnering with local firms who distribute our products. For our fixed income initiative, we continue to enhance our dedicated infrastructure, build our long-term track records and improve our Client engagement.
SLC Management
We expect to see continued investor demand for yield-oriented fixed income and alternative asset classes, as yields around the world continue to remain at or near historic lows. We believe we are well-positioned to meet this demand with our platform of world-class investment capabilities, complimentary businesses that drive product and distribution opportunities, and global resources that come from being part of Sun Life. The investment capabilities we use for our Clients are the same capabilities that we use in managing the general account of Sun Life Financial; this facilitates co-investment opportunities that result in an alignment of interest with our Clients and enables SLC Management's speed to market for products.
| | | | | | | | |
| Business | Description | Market position |
| MFS | • Actively manages assets for retail and institutional investors, including pension plans, sovereign wealth funds, monetary authorities, and endowments and foundations. • Retail products are distributed through financial advisors, brokerages and other professionals. • Institutional products are distributed by an internal sales force, which is aided by a network of independent consultants. | • US$693 billion in AUM. • The 10th largest U.S. Retail funds manager(1). |
| SLC Management | • SLC Management delivers public and private credit, fixed income, real estate and infrastructure solutions to Clients through a group of affiliate managers, including: • BentallGreenOak, a global real estate investment manager. • InfraRed Capital Partners, a global infrastructure and real estate investment manager headquartered in London, UK. • Crescent Capital Group, a U.S.-based global alternative credit investment manager. • SLC Management, a North American institutional asset manager specializing in investment grade public and private fixed income portfolios. • Institutional products are distributed by an internal sales force, which is aided by a network of independent consultants. | • $184 billion in AUM. |
(1) As reported by ISS Market Intelligence Simfund based on AUM as at December 31, 2021.
(1)Although considered reasonable, we may not be able to achieve our medium-term financial objectives as our assumptions may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual results could differ materially from our medium-term financial objectives as described above. Our medium-term financial objectives do not constitute guidance. Our medium-term financial objectives are forward-looking non-IFRS financial measures and additional information is provided in this MD&A in section O - Forward-looking Statements - Medium-Term Financial Objectives.
32 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Financial and Business Results
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Asset Management (C$ millions) | | | | 2021 | | 2020 | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | 892 | | 980 | |
Less: Fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards(1) | | | | (186) | | (92) | |
Acquisition, integration and restructuring(1)(2)(3) | | | | (247) | | (56) | |
Other(1)(4) | | | | (21) | | — | |
Underlying net income(5) | | | | 1,346 | | 1,128 | |
Assets under management (C$ billions)(5)(6) | | | | 1,059.2 | | 891.9 | |
Gross flows (C$ billions)(5)(7) | | | | 193.1 | | 190.0 | |
Net flows (C$ billions)(5)(7) | | | | 21.1 | | 17.2 | |
MFS (C$ millions) | | | | | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | 1,049 | | 942 | |
Less: Fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards(1) | | | | (186) | | (92) | |
Underlying net income(5) | | | | 1,235 | | 1,034 | |
Assets under management (C$ billions)(5) | | | | 875.2 | | 776.8 | |
Gross flows (C$ billions)(5) | | | | 150.1 | | 178.3 | |
Net flows (C$ billions)(5) | | | | (11.4) | | 17.7 | |
| MFS (US$ millions) | | | | | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | 836 | | 704 | |
Less: Fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards(1) | | | | (149) | | (70) | |
Underlying net income(5) | | | | 985 | | 774 | |
Pre-tax net operating profit margin ratio for MFS(5) | | | | 41 | % | 39 | % |
Average net assets (US$ billions)(5) | | | | 657.8 | | 525.4 | |
Assets under management (US$ billions)(5)(8) | | | | 692.8 | | 610.2 | |
Gross flows (US$ billions)(5) | | | | 119.7 | | 132.8 | |
Net flows (US$ billions)(5) | | | | (9.2) | | 13.1 | |
| Asset appreciation (depreciation) (US$ billions) | | | | 91.7 | | 69.7 | |
| S&P 500 Index (daily average) | | | | 4,266 | | 2,942 | |
| MSCI EAFE Index (daily average) | | | | 2,289 | | 1,853 | |
| SLC Management (C$ millions) | | | | | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | (157) | | 38 | |
Less: Acquisition, integration and restructuring(1)(2)(3) | | | | (247) | | (56) | |
Other(1)(4) | | | | (21) | | — | |
Underlying net income(5) | | | | 111 | | 94 | |
Assets under management (C$ billions)(5)(6) | | | | 183.9 | | 115.1 | |
Gross flows (C$ billions)(5)(7) | | | | 43.0 | | 11.7 | |
Net flows (C$ billions)(5)(7) | | | | 32.5 | | (0.5) | |
(1)Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment, including pre-tax adjustments.
(2)Amounts relate to acquisition costs for our acquisition of a majority stake in BentallGreenOak ("BGO acquisition"), our acquisition of a majority stake in InfraRed Capital Partners ("InfraRed acquisition"), and the Crescent acquisition, which include the unwinding of the discount for Other financial liabilities of $59 million in 2021 ($47 million in 2020).
(3)Reflects the changes in estimated future payments for acquisition-related contingent considerations and options to purchase remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates of $153 million in 2021.
(4)Other adjustments to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure include other items that are unusual or exceptional in nature. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(5)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(6)Effective January 1, 2021, the methodology for AUM was updated for SLC Management with respect to certain real estate and investment-grade fixed income products to include uncalled capital commitments. We have updated prior period amounts to reflect this change. For more details, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(7)Effective January 1, 2021, the methodology for gross flows and outflows was updated for SLC Management. Prior period amounts have not been updated. For more details, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(8)Monthly information on AUM is provided by MFS in its Corporate Fact Sheet, which can be found at www.mfs.com/CorpFact. The Corporate Fact Sheet also provides MFS's U.S. GAAP assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2021.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 33
Profitability
In 2021, Asset Management's reported net income of $892 million decreased $88 million or 9% compared to 2020, reflecting a $153 million increase in SLC Management’s acquisition-related liabilities(1) and higher fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards, partially offset by an increase in underlying net income of $218 million. The increase in underlying net income was driven by a 19% increase in MFS and an 18% increase in SLC Management. Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $67 million in reported net income and $85 million in underlying net income.
Growth
Asset Management’s AUM increased by $167.3 billion or 18.8% as at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020, driven by asset appreciation of $120.3 billion, the Crescent acquisition of $39.1 billion and net inflows of $21.1 billion.
Profitability and Growth by Business Unit
MFS
In 2021, MFS’s reported net income of US$836 million increased US$132 million or 19% compared to 2020, driven by an increase in underlying net income of US$211 million, partially offset by higher fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards. Underlying net income increased, driven by higher ANA, partially offset by higher variable compensation expenses and lower net investment returns.
MFS’s AUM increased by US$82.5 billion or 14% as at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020, driven by asset appreciation of US$91.7 billion, partially offset by net outflows of US$9.2 billion.
SLC Management
In 2021, SLC Management's reported net loss was $157 million, compared to reported net income of $38 million in 2020, reflecting a $153 million increase in SLC Management’s acquisition-related liabilities. Underlying net income of $111 million increased $17 million or 18%, driven by gains on real estate seed investments and results from our acquisitions, partially offset by higher performance fees in the prior year.
SLC Management's AUM increased by $68.8 billion or 60% as at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020, driven by the Crescent acquisition of $39.1 billion, net inflows of $32.5 billion and asset appreciation of $5.9 billion. These factors were partially offset by Client distributions of $6.4 billion.
4. Asia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Our Asia presence provides us with a strong footprint to take advantage of the high growth prospects in the region. We operate in eight Asian markets, delivering value to over 21 million Clients. Local Markets provides asset management, wealth, protection and health solutions through a multi-channel distribution approach. International Hubs offers leading insurance and wealth products through agency and broker distribution, including life insurance solutions, to High Net Worth families and individuals. |
| | | | | | | | |
| Business Units |
| • Local Markets | • International Hubs |
2021 Highlights
Growth in scale and distribution
•We ended 2021 with $63.5 billion in total AUM in our asset management and wealth businesses, up 2 billion from the prior year.
•In Vietnam, we are now the 4th largest bancassurance player and the 6th largest life insurer based on sales, up from 13th in 2020, driven by the rapid growth of our new bancassurance partnerships and the success of our agency force.
•In the Philippines, we established SLIMTC(2) to provide multi-strategy, local and global portfolio management services to deliver superior risk-adjusted returns for both individual and institutional investors.
•In Singapore, we launched our first High Net Worth life insurance product which helps Clients grow, protect and transfer their wealth to the next generation. This extends our presence to eight markets in Asia and reinforces our position in the international High Net Worth life insurance market.
•Established a relationship with MDRT Academy(3), an association helping financial professionals accelerate their careers, to supplement our existing elite advisor training program, the Brighter Academy. This partnership will support our goal of having the most respected advisors in the industry.
•Successful initial public offering of our India asset management joint venture, Aditya Birla Sun Life Asset Management Company Limited ("ABSLAMC")(4), which generated a gain of $362 million (post-tax $297 million).
(1)Reflects the changes in estimated future payments for acquisition-related contingent considerations and options to purchase remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates.
(2)Sun Life Investment Management and Trust Corporation (“SLIMTC”).
(3)Million Dollar Round Table ("MDRT").
(4)As a result of the initial public offering ("IPO"), our holding of ABSLAMC was reduced by 12.5%. After the IPO, we retained indirect ownership of the listed entity of 36.5%. Shares of ABSLAMC began trading on the BSE Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited on October 11, 2021.
34 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Putting Client Impact at the centre of everything we do
•We launched SunCanvas, a new scalable virtual solution for advisors to enhance Client experiences and increase non-face-to-face sales capabilities in the Philippines, Hong Kong, Indonesia and Vietnam.
•In the Philippines, we launched GoWell Studio, a premier digital on-demand wellness platform that includes virtual exercise programs, guided meditation sessions, and healthcare awareness and education content, amongst a variety of other features.
•We rolled out major upgrades to SunSmart, our digital point of sales tool, including straight-through processing capabilities in the Philippines for six key products and non-face-to-face sales capabilities in Malaysia.
Embed sustainability into our business to drive value creation and align with our Purpose
•We launched the Sun Life AM Hong Kong ESG Index Fund (SLHKEIB), bringing the first Hang Seng ESG 50 Index fund to investors in Hong Kong.
•We were the first Malaysian insurance company to launch an ESG investment-linked fund, the Global Sustainable Equity Fund, partnering with Nomura Asset Management.
Strategy and Outlook
To achieve our ambitious growth objectives, we will continue to fortify our operations in our established markets and capitalize on new opportunities in our existing markets. We are dedicated to building distribution excellence and offering a seamless, digitally powered Client experience. We will continue to foster our strong and distinctive culture, while attracting, developing and empowering high calibre talent. We will embed sustainability into our business, as we engage Clients along their journeys towards lifetime financial security and healthier lives. Our areas of focus for Asia are to:
Continue to build distribution excellence and scale
•Expand our reach across channels and segments to serve the growing insurance markets in Asia, by offering a diversified product lineup through a holistic sales advice process, including expanding our wealth and health solutions.
•Deliver a multi-channel experience engaging Clients where, when and how they wish.
•Create a unique brand in each market by building on our Most Respected Advisor ("MRA") program to further develop our professional agency force.
•Continue to effectively collaborate with existing bancassurance partners, including unlocking the potential of recent deals, and establish new bank relationships, to offer solutions to a wider range of Clients.
•Grow scale and enhance profitability by offering a holistic set of solutions to deliver on our Purpose of helping Clients to achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives.
Think and act like a digital company
•Digitize our business and leverage common tools and technology platforms across the region to enhance the Client and advisor experiences by making it easier to do business with us.
•Use data and analytics to drive advancement in prospect conversion, Client retention, advisor productivity, recruitment and training, with a focus on distribution quality.
•Increase engagement of prospective and existing Clients by being more personal, proactive, and predictive.
Embed sustainability into our business to drive value creation, positive impact, and align with our Purpose
•Provide quality advice and offer relevant financial solutions to enable Clients to plan and protect themselves from adverse financial events and invest for their future.
•Become a partner in our Clients' health journeys, by offering a wider set of valued health solutions and deepen the level of engagement across the Client relationship.
•Fully embed ESG into our investment processes and introduce ESG investment opportunities for our Clients.
Outlook
Our diversified business, with a multi-country presence and multi-channel distribution, positions us to capture opportunities as they arise, and protects our business against adverse economic or regulatory cycles in any one market. We expect that the region’s economic growth will continue, despite the uncertainties and short-term headwinds from COVID-19, and that rapid wealth creation, coupled with low penetration rates for insurance, will result in sustained growth across all of our distribution channels and markets over the medium-term. In addition, we expect to continue to reach more Clients by expanding and deepening our high-quality agency force and diverse network of bancassurance partners. Furthermore, we feel confident that our position among the global leaders in the international High Net Worth space will continue to generate value and positive outcomes for Clients.
Economic and geopolitical uncertainty, as well as intense competition, continue to pose challenges to our businesses, and these are further intensified by the ongoing pandemic. However, our steadfast dedication to our Purpose and our Clients, strengthening market positions, key strategic relationships, investments in digital and analytics, and our ability to leverage Sun Life's global expertise position us well for the future. As local governments continue to download responsibilities in both the retirement and health spaces, we are well-equipped to offer current and prospective Clients a diverse range of products and solutions.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 35
| | | | | | | | |
| Business | Description | Market Position |
| Local Markets |
Philippines(1) | • Individual and group life and health insurance products to individuals and businesses through a multi-channel distribution network. • Asset management for individual and institutional Clients through agency, brokerage, bancassurance and digital partners. | • #1 ranked insurance company based on total premium(2). • #1 largest mutual fund operation in the country(3). |
| Indonesia | • Individual life and health insurance and creditor life insurance through agency, telco arrangements and banks, including a bancassurance partnership with CIMB Niaga, Indonesia's 5th largest bank | • 11th ranked insurance company(4). |
| Vietnam | • Individual insurance and pensions distributed through agency, corporate sales, and digital distribution channels and partnerships, including exclusive bancassurance agreements with TPBank(5) and ACB(5). | • 6th ranked insurance company(6) |
Malaysia(7) | • Individual and group insurance through banks and telco arrangements, including an exclusive bancassurance agreement with CIMB Bank, Malaysia's 2nd largest bank, and a growing agency force. | • 4th in bancassurance sales, 7th overall(8). |
India(9) | • Individual and group insurance, savings and retirement products through agency, brokerage and bancassurance channels. • Asset management for both individual and institutional investors through independent financial advisors, banks, and direct distribution channels. | • 7th largest life insurance company in India(10). • 4th largest mutual fund operation in the country(11). |
China(12) | • Individual and group life and health insurance and savings products distributed through agency, brokerage, bancassurance and digital channels. • Institutional asset management, passive third-party asset management and debt financing business through direct distribution. | • 11th ranked life insurance company in China among multinationals(13). |
International Hubs |
| Hong Kong | • Mandatory Provident Fund ("MPF") and pension administration to individuals and businesses through agency and brokerage distribution. • Individual and group life and health insurance through agency and brokerage distribution, including life insurance solutions for High Net Worth Clients. | • 3rd largest provider based on AUM, 2nd based on net inflows(14) • Top 10 in Agency for Life Insurance(15). |
| International | • Individual life insurance solutions for High Net Worth Clients residing outside the U.S. and Canada • Manages a block of International wealth investment products closed to new sales. | • A leader in international High Net Worth life insurance business. |
| Singapore | • Individual life insurance solutions for High Net Worth Clients in Asia. | • New entrant to the market in 2021. |
(1)Philippines: Includes a joint venture with the Yuchengco Group - Sun Life Grepa Financial, Inc. (49%).
(2)Insurance Commission of the Philippines, based on Q2 2021 year-to-date total premium income for Sun Life of Canada (Philippines).
(3)Philippine Investment Funds Association, based on September 2021 ending AUM.
(4)Indonesia Life Insurance Association industry report, based on Q3 2021 year-to-date first year premiums.
(5)Tien Phong Commercial Bank ("TPBank") and Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank ("ACB").
(6)November 2021 year-to-date annualized first year premiums based on data shared among industry players.
(7)Malaysia: Joint ventures with Khazanah Nasional Berhad and CIMB Group Holdings Berhad - Sun Life Malaysia Assurance Berhad (49%), Sun Life Malaysia Takaful Berhad (49%).
(8)Life Insurance Association of Malaysia and Insurance Services Malaysia Berhad, based on Q3 2021 year-to-date annualized first year premium for conventional and takaful business.
(9)India: Joint venture with Aditya Birla Group - Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited (49%) and Aditya Birla Sun Life Asset Management Company Limited (36.5% indirect ownership).
(10)Insurance Regulatory Authority of India, based on Q3 2021 year-to-date first year premiums among private players.
(11)Association of Mutual Funds in India, based on average AUM for the quarter ended December 31, 2021.
(12)China: Joint ventures with the China Everbright Group: Sun Life Everbright Life Insurance Company Limited (24.99%), Sun Life Everbright Asset Management Co., Ltd (24.74%).
(13)China Insurance Regulatory Commission, based on gross premiums for Q3 2021 year-to-date (excluding universal life insurance deposits and pension companies).
(14)Mercer MPF Market Shares Report, September 2021.
(15)Insurance Authority of Hong Kong, Provisional Statistics on Hong Kong Long Term Insurance Business, based on Q3 2021 year-to-date annualized first year premiums.
Financial and Business Results
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| ($ millions) | | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| Local Markets | | | | | 608 | | 265 | |
| International Hubs | | | | | 467 | | 329 | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | | 1,075 | | 594 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | | | | | 61 | | (77) | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | | | | | 135 | | 99 | |
Acquisition, integration and restructuring(1) | | | | | 293 | | (7) | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | | | | | 586 | | 579 | |
Reported ROE (%)(2) | | | | | 17.4 | % | 10.1 | % |
Underlying ROE (%)(2) | | | | | 9.5 | % | 9.8 | % |
Insurance sales(2) | | | | | 1,258 | | 1,263 | |
Wealth sales(2) | | | | | 15,491 | | 10,937 | |
(1)Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment, including pre-tax amounts.
(2)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
36 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Profitability
In 2021, Asia's reported net income of $1,075 million increased $481 million or 81% compared to 2020, driven by a $297 million gain from the IPO of our India asset management joint venture, and favourable market-related and ACMA impacts. Underlying net income was in line with the prior year, as business growth and new business gains were offset by experience-related items and unfavourable foreign exchange translation. Experience in the year included unfavourable COVID-19-related mortality of $60 million from our India joint venture(1), the Philippines and Indonesia, as well as expense experience, partially offset by favourable credit. Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $67 million in reported net income and $40 million in underlying net income.
Growth
Asia insurance sales increased by 6%(2) in 2021 compared to 2020. Individual insurance sales were $1,219 million. Individual insurance sales increased 5%(2), driven by increases in Vietnam, India and the Philippines, partially offset by decreases in Hong Kong.
Asia wealth sales increased by 51%(2) in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by higher sales in India, the Philippines and Hong Kong.
Profitability by Business Unit and Growth by Business Market
Local Markets
Local Markets' reported net income of $608 million increased $343 million in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by a $297 million gain from the IPO of our India asset management joint venture, business growth, higher new business gains and favourable market-related impacts, partially offset by unfavourable expense and mortality experience, and the unfavourable impacts of foreign exchange translation.
We continued to build our agency and alternate distribution channels, leverage a more balanced product portfolio and increase efficiency and productivity, while maintaining Client focus.
Philippines - On a local currency basis, individual insurance sales increased 21% in 2021 compared to 2020. Mutual and managed fund AUM was $4.3 billion as at December 31, 2021, an increase of 40% compared to 2020, measured in local currency, reflecting strong money market sales.
Agency headcount reached approximately 22,300 at the end of 2021, 14% higher than 2020.
Indonesia - On a local currency basis, individual life insurance sales increased 9% in 2021 compared to 2020, with growth in the bancassurance channel, partially offset by lower sales in agency and telemarketing channel.
Agency headcount was at approximately 5,800 in 2021, an increase of 9% from the previous year-end.
Vietnam - On a local currency basis, individual insurance sales increased 262% in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by the new bancassurance channel and growth in the agency channel.
Agency headcount was almost 5,700 at the end of 2021, 11% lower than 2020, as a result of the impact of COVID-19 and stricter validation criteria.
Malaysia - On a local currency basis, individual insurance sales increased 6% in 2021 compared to 2020, with higher sales in the bancassurance channel.
Malaysia's agency force was at approximately 840 agents as at the end of 2021, 18% higher than 2020.
India - On a local currency basis, individual life insurance sales increased 21% in 2021 compared to 2020, with growth in all channels. On a local currency basis, gross sales of equity and fixed income funds increased 59%.
India's agency headcount reached 70,000 at the end of 2021, 14% lower than 2020 reflecting COVID-19 impacts and stricter validation criteria.
Total AUM as at December 31, 2021 was $50.4 billion, of which $18.3 billion is reported in our AUM based on Sun Life's 36.49% share, 9% higher than 2020.
China - On a local currency basis, individual insurance sales increased 13% in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by growth in the bancassurance channel, partially offset by lower sales in agency and broker channels.
Agency headcount reached 8,400 at the end of 2021, 63% lower than 2020 due to focus on quality.
International Hubs
International Hubs' reported net income of $467 million increased $138 million or 42% in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by favourable market-related and ACMA impacts, business growth and favourable credit experience, partially offset by the unfavourable impacts of foreign exchange and less favourable morbidity experience.
Hong Kong - On a local currency basis, individual insurance sales decreased 36% in 2021 compared to 2020, reflecting lower sales in the broker channel, partially offset by the agency channel. AUM in our pension business reached $21.5 billion as at December 31, 2021, an increase of 11% compared to 2020, measured in local currency, and pension net flows increased 35% compared to 2020.
Agency headcount increased by 12% from 2020 to approximately 2,500 at the end of 2021.
(1)Experience-related items from our India, China and Malaysia joint ventures and associates are recorded within other experience.
(2)This percentage change excludes the impacts of foreign exchange translation. For more information about these non-IFRS financial measures, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 37
International - On a constant currency basis, individual life insurance sales increased 3%(1) in 2021 compared to 2020, due to the competitive environment and market shifts in the first half of 2020.
Singapore - Singapore launched its first High-Net-Worth life insurance product in Q3 2021, driving $6 million of individual life insurance sales in 2021.
5. Corporate
Corporate includes the results of our UK business and Corporate Support.
| | | | | |
Business | Description |
| UK | • UK has a run-off block of business consisting of approximately 480,000 in-force life and pension policies, with approximately £10 billion of AUM. Since December 2010, UK has been closed to new business and focuses on supporting existing Clients. Most administrative functions have been outsourced to external service providers which are managed by an in-house management team. |
| Corporate Support | • Corporate Support operations consist of the certain expenses, debt charges, investment income, capital and other items, which pertain to monitoring and oversight of enterprise activities and Corporate treasury functions, which are not allocated to business segments. Corporate Support also includes our Run-off reinsurance business. Coverage in our Run-off reinsurance business includes long-term care, medical coverage, and guaranteed minimum income and death benefit coverage. The block also includes group long-term disability and personal accident policies which are 100% retroceded. |
Financial and Business Results
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| ($ millions) | | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| UK | | | | | 141 | | 193 | |
| Corporate Support | | | | | (231) | | (337) | |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | | | | | (90) | | (144) | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | | | | | (1) | | — | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | | | | | — | | 39 | |
Acquisition, integration and restructuring(1) | | | | | (51) | | (48) | |
Other(1)(2) | | | | | 10 | | — | |
Underlying net income (loss)(3) | | | | | (48) | | (135) | |
(1)Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment, including pre-tax amounts.
(2)Other adjustments to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure include other items that are unusual or exceptional in nature. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(3)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Profitability
In 2021, Corporate's reported net loss was $90 million, an improvement of $54 million compared to 2020, driven by the change in underlying net loss, partially offset by unfavourable ACMA impacts. Underlying net loss of $48 million improved $87 million, driven by a lower effective tax rate(2), partially offset by higher expenses.
Profitability by Business Unit
UK
UK's reported net income of $141 million decreased by $52 million or 27% in 2021 compared to 2020, reflecting less favourable ACMA impacts and lower investing activity.
Corporate Support
Corporate Support's reported net loss of $231 million improved $106 million or 31% in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by a lower effective tax rate(2), partially offset by unfavourable expense experience and unfavourable mortality experience in the run-off businesses.
(1)This percentage change excludes the impacts of foreign exchange translation. For more information about these non-IFRS financial measures, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(2)Prior year included an unfavourable adjustment relating to historical Canadian tax filings and lower tax-exempt investment income.
38 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The Company strives to ensure that all general fund investments are properly aligned with business objectives including meeting policyholder obligations and maintaining adequate liquidity at all times. Consideration is given in our investment process to a wide range of factors, including ensuring attractive risk and return profiles, appropriate diversification by asset type, credit exposure and sector, financial condition and ESG profile of issuers and borrowers, quality and value of underlying security and macro- and micro-economic developments and trends including prospects for specific industry sectors. The Risk Committee of the Board of Directors ("Risk Committee") approves policies that contain prudent standards and procedures for the investment of our general fund assets. These policies include requirements, restrictions and limitations for interest rate, credit, equity market, real estate market, liquidity, concentration, currency, and derivative risks. Compliance with these policies is monitored on a regular basis and reported annually to the Risk Committee. The Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee of the Board of Directors monitors the Company's Investment Plan and investment performance, oversees practices, procedures and controls related to the management of the general fund investment portfolio, and reviews corporate governance guidelines and processes.
1. Investment Profile
Total general fund invested assets of $184.5 billion as at December 31, 2021, compared to $177.9 billion as at December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due net purchases in our invested asset portfolio from general operating activities. This was partially offset by a decline in net fair value from rising interest rates, foreign exchange translation and decline in cash, including the funding of acquisitions. Our general fund invested assets are well-diversified across investment types, geographies and sectors with the majority of our portfolio invested in fixed income high-quality assets.
The following table sets out the composition of our general fund invested assets:(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ millions) | Carrying value | | Fair value | % of Total fair value | | Carrying value | | | Fair value | % of Total fair value |
| Cash, cash equivalents and short-term securities | 12,278 | | | 12,278 | | 6 | % | | 13,527 | | | | 13,527 | | 7 | % |
| Debt securities | 88,727 | | | 88,727 | | 47 | % | | 89,089 | | | | 89,089 | | 48 | % |
| Equity securities | 9,113 | | | 9,113 | | 5 | % | | 6,631 | | | | 6,631 | | 4 | % |
| Mortgages and loans | 51,692 | | | 55,756 | | 29 | % | | 49,946 | | | | 56,231 | | 31 | % |
| Derivative assets | 1,583 | | | 1,583 | | 1 | % | | 2,160 | | | | 2,160 | | 1 | % |
Other invested assets - financial assets | 7,081 | | | 7,071 | | 4 | % | | 4,167 | | | | 4,167 | | 2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Policy loans | 3,261 | | | 3,261 | | 2 | % | | 3,265 | | | | 3,265 | | 2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total financial assets | 173,735 | | | 177,789 | | 94 | % | | 168,785 | | | | 175,070 | | 95 | % |
| Investment properties | 9,109 | | | 9,109 | | 5 | % | | 7,516 | | | | 7,516 | | 4 | % |
| Other invested assets - non-financial assets | 1,678 | | | 1,678 | | 1 | % | | 1,611 | | | | 1,611 | | 1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total invested assets | 184,522 | | | 188,576 | | 100 | % | | 177,912 | | | | 184,197 | | 100 | % |
(1)The values and ratios presented are based on the fair value of the respective asset categories. Generally, the carrying values for invested assets are equal to their fair values; however our mortgages and loans are generally carried at amortized cost. For invested assets supporting insurance contracts, in the event of default, if the amounts recovered are insufficient to satisfy the related insurance contract liability cash flows that the assets are intended to support, credit exposure may be greater than the carrying value of the assets.
2. Debt Securities
Our debt securities portfolio is actively managed through a regular program of purchases and sales aimed at optimizing yield, quality and liquidity, while ensuring that it remains well-diversified and duration-matched to insurance contract liabilities. As at December 31, 2021, with the exception of certain countries where we have business operations, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Philippines, our exposure to debt securities from any single country did not exceed 1% of total invested assets.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 39
Debt Securities by Issuer and Industry Sector
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ millions) | Total | % of Total | Total | % of Total |
| Debt securities issued or guaranteed by: | | | | |
| Canadian federal government | 7,101 | | 8 | % | 6,489 | | 7 | % |
| Canadian provincial and municipal government | 17,079 | | 19 | % | 18,242 | | 20 | % |
| U.S. government and agency | 2,413 | | 3 | % | 2,475 | | 3 | % |
| Other foreign government | 5,511 | | 6 | % | 6,104 | | 7 | % |
| Total government issued or guaranteed debt securities | 32,104 | | 36 | % | 33,310 | | 37 | % |
Corporate debt securities by industry sector:(1) | | | | |
| Financials | 11,948 | | 14 | % | 11,856 | | 13 | % |
| Utilities | 8,192 | | 9 | % | 8,243 | | 9 | % |
| Industrials | 6,596 | | 7 | % | 6,226 | | 7 | % |
| Energy | 4,279 | | 5 | % | 4,802 | | 6 | % |
| Communication services | 3,886 | | 4 | % | 3,966 | | 5 | % |
Real estate | 2,688 | | 3 | % | 2,767 | | 3 | % |
| Health care | 2,427 | | 3 | % | 2,172 | | 2 | % |
| Consumer staples | 2,278 | | 3 | % | 2,051 | | 2 | % |
| Consumer discretionary | 2,120 | | 2 | % | 1,771 | | 2 | % |
| Information technology | 1,635 | | 2 | % | 1,495 | | 2 | % |
| Materials | 1,517 | | 2 | % | 1,625 | | 2 | % |
| Total corporate debt securities | 47,566 | | 54 | % | 46,974 | | 53 | % |
| Asset-backed securities | 9,057 | | 10 | % | 8,805 | | 10 | % |
| Total debt securities | 88,727 | | 100 | % | 89,089 | | 100 | % |
(1) Our grouping of debt securities by sector is based on the Global Industry Classification Standard and S&P Dow Jones Indices.
Debt Securities by Geography
The carrying value of fair value through profit or loss and AFS debt securities by geographic location is presented in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ millions) | FVTPL debt securities | AFS debt securities | Total | % of Total | FVTPL debt securities | AFS debt securities | Total | % of Total |
| Debt securities by geography: | | | | | | | | |
| Canada | 33,028 | | 5,135 | | 38,163 | | 43 | % | 34,005 | | 4,685 | | 38,690 | | 44 | % |
| United States | 26,678 | | 4,552 | | 31,230 | | 35 | % | 27,183 | | 3,984 | | 31,167 | | 35 | % |
| Europe | 8,289 | | 1,337 | | 9,626 | | 11 | % | 8,734 | | 966 | | 9,700 | | 11 | % |
| Asia | 5,249 | | 622 | | 5,871 | | 7 | % | 5,095 | | 600 | | 5,695 | | 6 | % |
| Other | 2,754 | | 1,083 | | 3,837 | | 4 | % | 2,817 | | 1,020 | | 3,837 | | 4 | % |
| Total debt securities | 75,998 | | 12,729 | | 88,727 | | 100 | % | 77,834 | | 11,255 | | 89,089 | | 100 | % |
Our gross unrealized losses as at December 31, 2021 for FVTPL and AFS debt securities were $405 million and $122 million, respectively, compared with $94 million and $27 million, respectively, as at December 31, 2020. The increase in gross unrealized losses was largely due to the impact from rising interest rates.
Debt Securities by Credit Rating
Debt securities with a credit rating of "A" or higher represented 73% of the total debt securities as at December 31, 2021, compared to 72% as at December 31, 2020. Debt securities with a credit rating of "BBB" or higher represented 99% of total debt securities as at December 31, 2021, compared to 98% as at December 31, 2020.
40 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The credit risk ratings in the following table were established in accordance with the internal rating process described in this MD&A under the heading J - Risk Management - 9 - Risk Categories - Credit Risk Management Governance and Control.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021 | 2020 |
| ($ millions) | FVTPL debt securities | AFS debt securities | Total debt securities | % of Total debt securities | FVTPL debt securities | AFS debt securities | Total debt securities | % of Total debt securities |
| Debt securities by credit rating: | | | | | | | | |
| AAA | 12,811 | | 5,294 | | 18,105 | | 20 | % | 12,794 | | 4,810 | | 17,604 | | 20 | % |
| AA | 11,510 | | 1,502 | | 13,012 | | 15 | % | 11,870 | | 1,586 | | 13,456 | | 15 | % |
| A | 29,984 | | 3,282 | | 33,266 | | 38 | % | 30,812 | | 2,600 | | 33,412 | | 37 | % |
| BBB | 20,710 | | 2,484 | | 23,194 | | 26 | % | 21,203 | | 2,091 | | 23,294 | | 26 | % |
| BB and lower | 983 | | 167 | | 1,150 | | 1 | % | 1,155 | | 168 | | 1,323 | | 2 | % |
| Total debt securities | 75,998 | | 12,729 | | 88,727 | | 100 | % | 77,834 | | 11,255 | | 89,089 | | 100 | % |
3. Equities
Our equity portfolio is well-diversified with approximately 64% of our portfolio invested in exchange-traded funds as at December 31, 2021, compared to 58% as at December 31, 2020. Exchange-traded fund holdings are primarily in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and Tracker Fund of Hong Kong Ltd. The carrying value of equities by issuer geography as at December 31, 2021 is set out in the following table.
Equities by Issuer Geography
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ millions) | FVTPL equities | AFS equities | Total | % of Total | FVTPL equities | AFS equities | Total | % of Total |
| Equity securities: | | | | | | | | |
| Canada | 3,301 | | 62 | | 3,363 | | 37 | % | 3,064 | | 15 | | 3,079 | | 47 | % |
| United States | 2,010 | | 1,405 | | 3,415 | | 37 | % | 1,046 | | 148 | | 1,194 | | 18 | % |
| Europe | 449 | | 6 | | 455 | | 5 | % | 418 | | 6 | | 424 | | 6 | % |
| Asia | 1,768 | | 102 | | 1,870 | | 21 | % | 1,832 | | 93 | | 1,925 | | 29 | % |
| Other | 10 | | — | | 10 | | — | % | 9 | | — | | 9 | | — | % |
| Total equity securities | 7,538 | | 1,575 | | 9,113 | | 100 | % | 6,369 | | 262 | | 6,631 | | 100 | % |
Excluding exchange-traded funds and mutual funds, there were no issuers exceeding 1% of the equity portfolio as at December 31, 2021.
4. Mortgages and Loans
Mortgages and loans are presented at their carrying value in our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Our mortgage portfolio consisted almost entirely of first mortgages and our loan portfolio consisted of private placement loans.
Mortgages and Loans by Geography
The carrying value of mortgages and loans by geographic location is presented in the following table.(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ millions) | Mortgages | Loans | Total | % of Total | Mortgages | Loans | Total | % of Total |
| Canada | 9,569 | | 12,885 | | 22,454 | | 43 | % | 9,119 | | 13,107 | | 22,226 | | 44 | % |
| United States | 5,907 | | 14,596 | | 20,503 | | 40 | % | 6,309 | | 13,773 | | 20,082 | | 40 | % |
| Europe | 9 | | 6,093 | | 6,102 | | 12 | % | — | | 5,352 | | 5,352 | | 11 | % |
| Asia | — | | 532 | | 532 | | 1 | % | — | | 366 | | 366 | | 1 | % |
| Other | — | | 2,101 | | 2,101 | | 4 | % | — | | 1,920 | | 1,920 | | 4 | % |
| Total mortgages and loans | 15,485 | | 36,207 | | 51,692 | | 100 | % | 15,428 | | 34,518 | | 49,946 | | 100 | % |
| % of Total Invested Assets | 8 | % | 20 | % | 28 | % | | 9 | % | 19 | % | 28 | % | |
(1)The geographic location for mortgages is based on the location of the property and for loans it is based on the country of the creditor's parent.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 41
Mortgage Portfolio
As at December 31, 2021, we held $15.5 billion of mortgages, compared to $15.4 billion as at December 31, 2020. Our mortgage portfolio consists entirely of commercial mortgages, as presented in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ millions) | Insured | Uninsured | Total | Insured | Uninsured | Total |
| Mortgages: | | | | | | |
| Retail | — | 3,388 | 3,388 | — | 3,710 | 3,710 |
| Office | — | 3,531 | 3,531 | — | 3,481 | 3,481 |
| Multi-family residential | 3,870 | 1,857 | 5,727 | 3,663 | 1,968 | 5,631 |
| Industrial and land | — | 2,035 | 2,035 | — | 1,945 | 1,945 |
| Other | 348 | 456 | 804 | 345 | 316 | 661 |
| Total mortgages | 4,218 | 11,267 | 15,485 | 4,008 | 11,420 | 15,428 |
| % of Total mortgages | 27 | % | 73 | % | 100 | % | 26 | % | 74 | % | 100 | % |
Our mortgage portfolio consists entirely of commercial mortgages, including retail, office, multi-family, industrial and land properties. As at December 31, 2021, 37% of our commercial mortgage portfolio consisted of multi-family residential mortgages; there are no single-family residential mortgages. Our uninsured commercial portfolio had a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of approximately 58% as at December 31, 2021, consistent to December 31, 2020. While we generally limit the maximum loan-to-value ratio to 75% at issuance, we may invest in mortgages with a higher loan-to-value ratio in Canada if the mortgage is insured by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation ("CMHC"). The estimated weighted average debt service coverage for our uninsured commercial portfolio is 1.72 times. Of the $4.1 billion of multi-family residential mortgages in the Canadian commercial mortgage portfolio, 93% were insured by the CMHC.
The following tables summarize our mortgages by credit quality indicator:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | December 31, 2021 | As % of Total Mortgages | December 31, 2020 | As % of Total Mortgages |
| Mortgages by credit rating: | | | | |
| Insured | 4,218 | | 27 | % | 4,008 | | 26 | % |
| AAA | — | | — | % | — | | — | % |
| AA | 1,640 | | 11 | % | 1,435 | | 9 | % |
| A | 4,979 | | 32 | % | 4,031 | | 26 | % |
| BBB | 3,814 | | 25 | % | 4,524 | | 30 | % |
| BB and lower | 822 | | 5 | % | 1,404 | | 9 | % |
| Impaired | 12 | | — | % | 26 | | — | % |
| Total mortgages | 15,485 | | 100 | % | 15,428 | | 100 | % |
| | | | |
Loan Portfolio
As at December 31, 2021, we held $36.2 billion of loans, compared to $34.5 billion as at December 31, 2020. Private placement loans provide diversification by type of loan, industry segment and borrower credit quality. The private placement loan portfolio consists of senior secured and unsecured loans to large- and mid-market corporate borrowers, securitized lease/loan obligations secured by a variety of assets, and project finance loans in sectors such as power and infrastructure.
The credit risk ratings in the following table were established in accordance with the internal rating process described in this MD&A under the heading J - Risk Management - 9 - Risk Categories - Credit Risk Management Governance and Control. As at December 31, 2021, 94% of our total loan portfolio is investment grade, compared to 93% as at December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | December 31, 2021 | As % of Total Loans | December 31, 2020 | As % of Total Loans |
| Loans by credit rating: | | | | |
| AAA | 192 | | 1 | % | 212 | | 1 | % |
| AA | 4,994 | | 14 | % | 4,906 | | 14 | % |
| A | 14,231 | | 39 | % | 13,183 | | 38 | % |
| BBB | 14,632 | | 40 | % | 13,758 | | 40 | % |
| BB and lower | 2,139 | | 6 | % | 2,427 | | 7 | % |
| Impaired | 19 | | — | % | 32 | | — | % |
| Total loans | 36,207 | | 100 | % | 34,518 | | 100 | % |
42 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The following tables summarize our loans by sector:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | December 31, 2021 | As % of Total Loans | December 31, 2020 | As % of Total Loans |
| Loans by Sector: | | | | |
| Corporate issued loans | 24,852 | | 69 | % | 22,886 | | 66 | % |
| Canadian provincial & municipal government | 7,041 | | 19 | % | 7,124 | | 21 | % |
| U.S. government & agency | 2,783 | | 8 | % | 2,962 | | 9 | % |
| Other foreign government | 1,470 | | 4 | % | 1,481 | | 4 | % |
Canadian federal government | 61 | | — | % | 65 | | — | % |
| Total loans | 36,207 | | 100 | % | 34,518 | | 100 | % |
Mortgages and Loans Past Due or Impaired
The gross carrying value and allowance for mortgages and loans past due or impaired are presented in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 |
| Gross carrying value | Allowance for losses |
| ($ millions) | Mortgages | Loans | Total | Mortgages | Loans | Total |
| Not past due | 15,473 | | 36,188 | | 51,661 | | — | | — | | — | |
| Past due: | | | | | | |
| Past due less than 90 days | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Past due 90 days or more | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Impaired | 92 | | 71 | | 163 | | 80 | | 52 | | 132 | |
Total | 15,565 | | 36,259 | | 51,824 | | 80 | | 52 | | 132 | |
| | | | | | |
| December 31, 2020 |
| Gross carrying value | Allowance for losses |
| ($ millions) | Mortgages | Loans | Total | Mortgages | Loans | Total |
| Not past due | 15,402 | | 34,486 | | 49,888 | | — | | — | | — | |
| Past due: | | | | | | |
| Past due less than 90 days | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Past due 90 days or more | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Impaired | 92 | | 81 | | 173 | | 66 | 49 | | 115 | |
Total | 15,494 | | 34,567 | | 50,061 | | 66 | | 49 | | 115 | |
Our impaired mortgages and loans, net of allowances for losses, were $31 million as at December 31, 2021, compared to $58 million as at December 31, 2020.
5. Derivatives
The fair value of derivative assets held by the Company was $1,583 million, while the fair value of derivative liabilities was $1,392 million as at December 31, 2021, compared to a fair value of derivative assets of $2,160 million and a fair value of derivative liabilities of $1,744 million as at December 31, 2020.
We use derivative instruments to manage risks related to interest rate, equity market and currency fluctuations and in replication strategies to reproduce permissible investments. Our use of derivatives in these risk mitigation strategies does not mitigate all risk exposure; rather, they are used to keep us within our risk tolerance limits.
In addition to the general policies and monitoring, we use a variety of tools in counterparty risk management. Over-the-counter ("OTC") derivative transactions are executed under International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") Master Agreements. A Credit Support Annex accompanies most of the ISDAs, which establish requirements for collateral.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The values associated with our derivative instruments are presented in the following table. Notional amounts serve as the basis for payments calculated under derivatives contracts and are generally not exchanged.
| | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| Net fair value asset (liability) | 191 | | 416 | |
| Total notional amount | 65,966 | | 62,792 | |
Credit equivalent amount(1) | 1,179 | | 904 | |
Risk-weighted credit equivalent amount(1) | 28 | 21 |
(1)Amounts presented are net of collateral received.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 43
The net fair value of derivatives was an asset of $191 million as at December 31, 2021, compared to an asset of $416 million as at
December 31, 2020. The decrease in net fair value was primarily due to the impact from upward shifts in yield curves, partially offset by the strengthening of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar on foreign exchange contracts.
The total notional amount of our derivatives increased to $66.0 billion as at December 31, 2021 from $62.8 billion as at December 31, 2020. The change in notional amount is mainly attributable to an increase in foreign exchange contracts used for hedging foreign currency assets.
Certain of our derivatives are designated in qualifying hedging relationships for accounting purposes, and represented $1.2 billion, or 1.8% of the total notional amount. Derivatives are designated in hedging relationships for accounting purposes to minimize accounting mismatches. These hedging relationships are documented at inception and hedge effectiveness is assessed on a quarterly basis.
Our derivatives designated in qualifying hedging relationships for accounting purposes include interest rate swaps, foreign exchange agreements, equity forwards and, previously, currency swaps. We designate certain interest rate swaps in fair value hedging relationships to hedge interest rate exposure on AFS assets. We also designate certain foreign exchange agreements in fair value and cash flow hedging relationships to manage foreign currency fluctuations associated with AFS assets. Additionally, we designate certain equity forwards in cash flow hedging relationships for anticipated payments of awards under certain stock-based compensation plans.
Credit Equivalent Amount
As the regulator of the Canadian insurance industry, OSFI provides guidelines to quantify the use of derivatives. The credit equivalent amount, a measure used to approximate the potential credit exposure, is determined as the replacement cost of the derivative contracts with a positive fair value plus an amount representing the potential future credit exposure.
The risk-weighted credit equivalent amount is a measure used to determine the amount of capital necessary to support derivative transactions for certain Canadian regulatory purposes. It is determined by weighting the credit equivalent amount according to the nature of the derivative and the creditworthiness of the counterparties.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021 | 2020 |
| ($ millions) | Credit equivalent amount ("CEA")(1) | Risk weighted CEA(1) | Credit equivalent amount ("CEA")(1) | Risk weighted CEA(1) |
| Foreign exchange contracts | 1,024 | | 24 | | 787 | | 18 | |
| Interest rate contracts | 90 | | 2 | | 86 | | 2 | |
| Equity and other contracts | 65 | | 2 | | 31 | | 1 | |
| Total | 1,179 | | 28 | | 904 | | 21 | |
(1) Amounts presented are net of collateral received.
Credit Default Swaps By Underlying Financial Instrument Credit Rating
Credit default swaps ("CDS") are derivative contracts that transfer credit risk related to an underlying referenced financial instrument from one counterparty to another. The purchaser receives protection against the decline in the value of the referenced financial instrument as a result of specified credit events such as default or bankruptcy. The Company sells credit protection through CDS to replicate credit exposure of an underlying reference security and enhance investment returns. The credit risk ratings of the underlying reference securities for single name contracts were established in accordance with the internal rating process described in section J - Risk Management - 9 - Risk Categories - Credit Risk Management Governance and Control.
The following table provides a summary of the credit default swap protection sold by credit rating of the underlying reference security.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021 | 2020 |
| ($ millions) | Notional amount | Fair value | Notional amount | Fair value |
| Single name credit default swap contracts | | | | |
| AA | 38 | | 1 | | 38 | | 1 | |
| A | 347 | | 4 | | 325 | | 4 | |
| BBB | 431 | | 9 | | 530 | | 12 | |
| BB | 19 | | — | | 19 | | — | |
| Total single name credit default swap contracts | 835 | | 14 | | 912 | | 17 | |
| Credit default swap index contracts | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Total credit default swap contracts sold | 835 | | 14 | | 912 | | 17 | |
| | | | |
Additional detail on our derivative portfolio by derivative type is provided in Note 6.A.iv of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
44 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
6. Investment Properties
Office, retail and industrial properties are the major components of our investment properties portfolio, representing approximately 75% as at December 31, 2021. The increase in our investment property portfolio is predominantly driven by net purchases, partially offset by market appraisal losses and foreign exchange translation in the year.
Investment Properties by Type and Geography
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 |
| ($ millions) | Office | Industrial | Retail | Multi-family residential | Other | Total | % of Total by Geography |
| Canada | 1,784 | | 2,481 | | 971 | | 1,396 | | 750 | | 7,382 | | 81 | % |
| United States | 665 | | 600 | | 260 | | 73 | | 66 | | 1,664 | | 18 | % |
| Europe | 19 | | 20 | | 24 | | — | | — | | 63 | | 1 | % |
| Total | 2,468 | | 3,101 | | 1,255 | | 1,469 | | 816 | | 9,109 | | 100 | % |
| % of Total by Type | 27 | % | 34 | % | 14 | % | 16 | % | 9 | % | 100 | % | |
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2020 |
| ($ millions) | Office | Industrial | Retail | Multi-family residential | Other | Total | % of Total by Geography |
| Canada | 1,792 | | 1,726 | | 912 | | 1,004 | | 646 | | 6,080 | | 81 | % |
| United States | 768 | | 269 | | 237 | | 67 | | 30 | | 1,371 | | 18 | % |
| Europe | 22 | | 13 | | 28 | | — | | 2 | | 65 | | 1 | % |
| Total | 2,582 | | 2,008 | | 1,177 | | 1,071 | | 678 | | 7,516 | | 100 | % |
| % of Total by Type | 34 | % | 27 | % | 16 | % | 14 | % | 9 | % | 100 | % | |
7. Impaired Assets
Financial assets that are classified as FVTPL, which represented 48% of our invested assets as at December 31, 2021, do not have allowances for losses since changes in the fair value of these assets are recorded to income and the assets are recorded at fair value in our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. In the event of default, if the amounts recovered are insufficient to satisfy the related insurance contract liability cash flows that the assets are intended to support, credit exposure may be greater than the carrying value of the asset.
In the absence of objective evidence of impairment, impairment losses are not recognized on AFS debt securities, equity securities and other invested assets. If the cost of these assets is greater than their fair values, unrealized losses are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Unrealized losses may be due to interest rate fluctuations or depressed fair values in sectors which have experienced strong negative market performance. Additional detail on our impairment policy is provided in Note 1.iii of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
8. Asset Default Provision
We make provisions for possible future credit events in the determination of our insurance contract liabilities. The amount of the provision for asset default included in insurance contract liabilities is based on possible reductions in future investment yields that vary by factors such as type of asset, asset credit quality (rating), duration and country of origin. To the extent that an asset is written off, or disposed of, any amounts that were set aside in our insurance contract liabilities for possible future asset defaults in respect of that asset are released.
Our asset default provision reflects the provision relating to future credit events for fixed income assets currently held by the Company that support our insurance contract liabilities. Our asset default provision as at December 31, 2021 was $2,992 million for losses related to possible future credit events for fixed income assets currently held by the Company that support our insurance contract liabilities. This represents 2.4% of the fixed income assets supporting insurance contract liabilities reported on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at December 31, 2021.
Our asset default provision as at December 31, 2021 was $135 million or 5% lower than the provision as at December 31, 2020 of $3,127 million, primarily due to the release of provisions on fixed income assets supporting our insurance contract liabilities, changes in ratings and foreign exchange translation, partially offset by increases in the provisions for assets purchased net of dispositions.
A one-notch downgrade of 25% of our fixed income investment portfolio(1) would result in an increase in insurance contract liabilities from the changes in ratings of $125 million post-tax and a decrease to our common shareholders' net income. This excludes the impact from the release of best estimate credit provision and fixed income investments not impacting shareholders net income, for example assets supporting participating policyholders. Of this total amount, approximately 60% related to our BBB portfolio.
(1)Excluding federal and provincial securities, asset-backed securities, mortgage-backed securities, and CMHC mortgages.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 45
The following table sets out the changes in our asset default provision for existing fixed income investments.
| | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | 2021 | 2020 |
| Opening balance | 3,127 | | 2,637 | |
Purchases, dispositions and net asset movement(1) | 251 | | 690 | |
| Changes in assumptions and methodologies | — | | — | |
| Changes in ratings | (25) | | 170 | |
Release of provisions(2) | (339) | | (323) | |
| Currency | (22) | | (47) | |
| Closing balance | 2,992 | | 3,127 | |
(1) Net movement reflects the fluctuation in the value of FVTPL assets arising from movements in interest rates, credit spreads and other factors that impact the market value of fixed income investments.
(2) This amount represents the orderly release of provisions for future credit events held in insurance contract liabilities.
| | | | | |
| I. Capital and Liquidity Management | |
Capital and liquidity management is core to our business as an insurance company. We ensure adequate capital for the protection of our policyholders, Clients and creditors, while managing capital adequacy and allocation across our businesses for the benefit of our shareholders. In addition, we maintain strong financial flexibility by ensuring that sufficient liquid assets are available to cover our anticipated payment obligations and funding requirements. We invest in various types of assets with a view to matching them with liabilities of various durations.
The regulatory environments in which we operate are expected to evolve as governments and regulators work to develop the appropriate level of financial regulation required to ensure that capital, liquidity and risk management practices are sufficient to withstand severe economic downturns.
1. Capital
We have a capital risk policy designed to maintain a strong capital position and to provide the flexibility necessary to take advantage of growth opportunities, to support the risk associated with our businesses and to optimize shareholder return. Our capital risk policy is also intended to provide an appropriate level of risk management over capital adequacy risk, which is defined as the risk that capital is not or will not be sufficient to withstand adverse economic conditions, to maintain financial strength, or to allow the Company and its subsidiaries to take advantage of opportunities for expansion. Our capital base is structured to exceed minimum regulatory and internal capital targets and to maintain strong credit and financial strength ratings, while maintaining a capital-efficient structure. Capital is managed both on a consolidated basis under principles that consider all the risks associated with the business as well as at the business group level under the principles appropriate to the jurisdictions in which we operate. The capital of our foreign subsidiaries is managed on a local statutory basis in a manner commensurate with their individual risk profiles.
Sun Life, including all of its business groups, engages in a capital planning process annually in which capital deployment options, capital raising and dividend recommendations are presented to the Board of Directors ("Board"). Capital reviews are regularly conducted which consider the potential impacts under various business, interest rate and equity market scenarios. Relevant components of these capital reviews, including dividend recommendations, are presented to the Risk Committee on a quarterly basis. The Board is responsible for the approval of our annual capital plan and quarterly shareholder dividends.
The Company's capital risk policy establishes policies, operating guidelines and procedures that govern the management of capital. The capital risk policy is reviewed annually by the Risk Committee and any changes are approved by the Board. Our Corporate Capital & Treasury and Risk Management functions are responsible for the development and implementation of the capital risk policy.
The Company's capital base consists mainly of common shareholders' equity. Other sources of capital include preferred shares and other equity instruments, non-controlling interests, participating policyholders' equity, subordinated debt issued by SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance, and certain other capital securities that qualify as regulatory capital. For Canadian regulatory purposes, our capital also includes innovative capital instruments issued by Sun Life Capital Trust.
46 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The following table summarizes the sources of our capital and our capital position over the past two years. Notes 13, 14, 15 and 21 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements include additional details on our capital.
| | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | 2021 | | 2020 | |
Subordinated debt(1) | 6,425 | | 4,781 | |
Innovative capital instruments(2) | 200 | | 200 | |
| Equity | | |
| Preferred shares and other equity instruments | 2,239 | | 2,257 | |
Common shareholders' equity(3) | 24,075 | | 22,212 | |
| Participating policyholders' equity | 1,700 | | 1,368 | |
| Non-controlling interests' equity | 59 | | 25 | |
| Total equity | 28,073 | | 25,862 | |
Total capital(1) | 34,698 | | 30,843 | |
Financial leverage ratio(1)(4) | 25.5 | % | 23.5 | % |
(1)Includes $2.0 billion of proceeds from the subordinated debt offerings completed in November 2021, of which $1.5 billion is subject to contractual terms requiring us to redeem the underlying securities, in full, if the closing of the DentaQuest acquisition does not occur. These amounts will not qualify as LICAT capital until the acquisition closes.
(2)Innovative capital instruments are presented net of associated transaction costs and consist of SLEECS, which were issued by Sun Life Capital Trust. SLEECS qualify as capital for Canadian regulatory purposes. However, under IFRS they are reported as Senior debentures in our Annual and Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)Common shareholders’ equity is equal to Total shareholders’ equity less Preferred shares and other equity instruments.
(4)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Our total capital consists of subordinated debt and other capital instruments, participating policyholders' equity, non-controlling interests and total shareholders' equity, which includes common shareholders' equity, preferred shares and other equity instruments.
Common shareholders' equity was $24.1 billion as at December 31, 2021, compared with $22.2 billion as at December 31, 2020. The increase of $1.9 billion was due to common shareholders' net income and other comprehensive income, partially offset by dividends.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 47
The table below provides the earliest par call and maturity dates for our subordinated debt, innovative capital instruments, preferred shares and other equity instruments outstanding as at December 31, 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Description | Interest Rate | Earliest Par Call Date/Redemption Date(1) | Maturity | Principal/ Face Amount ($ millions) |
| Subordinated Debt Issued by Sun Life Assurance | | | | |
| 6.30% Debentures, Series 2 | 6.30% | n/a | 2028 | 150 |
| Subordinated Debt Issued by SLF Inc. | | | | |
| Series 2007-1 | 5.40% | May 29, 2037 | 2042 | 400 |
| Series 2016-2 | 3.05% | September 19, 2023 | 2028 | 1,000 |
| Series 2017-1 | 2.75% | November 23, 2022 | 2027 | 400 |
| Series 2019-1 | 2.38% | August 13, 2024 | 2029 | 750 |
| Series 2020-1 | 2.58% | May 10, 2027 | 2032 | 1,000 | |
| Series 2020-2 | 2.06% | October 1, 2030 | 2035 | 750 |
| Series 2021-1 | 2.46% | November 18, 2026 | 2031 | 500 |
| Series 2021-2 | 2.80% | November 21, 2028 | 2033 | 1,000 |
| Series 2021-3 | 3.15% | November 18, 2031 | 2036 | 500 |
| | | | |
| Trust Units Issued by Sun Life Capital Trust | | | | |
| SLEECS - Series B | 7.09% | June 30, 2032 | Perpetual | 200 | |
| | | | |
| Class A Preferred Shares and Other Equity Instruments Issued by SLF Inc. | | | | |
| Series 3 | 4.45% | Any time | Perpetual | 250 |
| Series 4 | 4.45% | Any time | Perpetual | 300 |
| Series 5 | 4.50% | Any time | Perpetual | 250 |
Series 8R(2) | 1.825% | June 30, 2025 | Perpetual | 155 |
Series 9QR(3) | Floating | June 30, 2025(5) | Perpetual | 125 |
Series 10R(2) | 2.967% | September 30, 2021 | Perpetual | 171 |
Series 11QR(4) | Floating | September 30, 2021(5) | Perpetual | 29 |
| | | | |
Series 2021-1 - LRCN(6) | 3.600% | June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2081 | 1,000 |
(1)The earliest date on which the Company has the option, but not the obligation, to call securities for redemption at their par value. Redemption of these securities is subject to regulatory approval.
(2)On the earliest redemption date and every five years thereafter, the dividend rate will reset to an annual rate equal to the 5-year Government of Canada bond yield plus a spread specified for each series. The specified spread for Class A shares is: Series 8R - 1.41% and Series 10R - 2.17%. On the earliest redemption date and every five years thereafter, holders will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into the series that is one number higher than their existing series.
(3)Holders of Series 9QR Shares will be entitled to receive quarterly floating rate non-cumulative dividends at an annual rate equal to the then 3-month Government of Canada treasury bill yield plus 1.41%. Holders of the Series 9QR Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their Series 9QR Shares into Series 8R Shares on June 30, 2025, and on June 30 every five years thereafter.
(4)Holders of Series 11QR Shares will be entitled to receive quarterly floating rate non-cumulative dividends at an annual rate equal to the then 3-month Government of Canada treasury bill yield plus 2.17%. Holders of the Series 11QR Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their Series 11QR Shares into Series 10R Shares on September 30, 2021, and on September 30 every five years thereafter.
(5)Redeemable on the redemption date and every five years thereafter, in whole or in part, at par, and on any other date at $25.50 per share.
(6)Series 2021-1 Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.60% payable semi-annually until June 30, 2026. On June 30, 2026, and every five years thereafter until June 30, 2076, the interest rate on the Series 2-21-1 Notes will be reset at an interest rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada yield, as defined in the prospectus, plus 2.604%. In case of non-payment of interest on or principal of the Series 2021-1 Notes when due, the recourse of each noteholder will be limited to that holder's proportionate share of the Limited Recourse Trust's assets. For more information about the LRCN, see Note 15.B of the 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
48 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The following table shows the number of common shares and stock options outstanding of SLF Inc. for the last two years.
| | | | | | | | |
| Number of Common Shares Outstanding | | |
| (in millions) | 2021 | | 2020 | |
| Balance, beginning of year | 585.1 | | 587.8 | |
| Stock options exercised | 0.9 | | 0.8 | |
| Common shares repurchased and cancelled | — | | (3.5) | |
| | |
| Balance, end of year | 586.0 | | 585.1 | |
| | |
| Number of Stock Options Outstanding | | |
| (in millions) | 2021 | | 2020 | |
| Balance, beginning of year | 3.2 | | 3.1 | |
| Options issued | 0.8 | | 0.7 | |
| Options exercised, forfeited or expired | (0.9) | | (0.6) | |
| Balance, end of year | 3.0 | | 3.2 | |
Under our Canadian Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan ("DRIP"), Canadian-resident common and preferred shareholders may choose to have their dividends automatically reinvested in common shares of SLF Inc. and may also purchase common shares through our DRIP with cash. For dividend reinvestments, we may, at our option, issue common shares of SLF Inc. from treasury at a discount of up to 5% to the volume-weighted average trading price or direct that common shares be purchased on behalf of participants on the open market through the TSX and alternative Canadian trading platforms (collectively, the "Exchanges") at the market price. Common shares of SLF Inc. acquired by participants through optional cash purchases may also be issued from treasury or purchased through the Exchanges at SLF Inc.'s option, in either case at no discount. Commencing with the dividends payable on March 31, 2016 and until further notice, common shares purchased under the Plan were purchased on the open market. There are no applicable discounts because the common shares are being purchased on the open market and are not being issued from treasury.
SLF Inc. grants stock options to certain employees. These options are granted at the closing price of SLF Inc.'s common shares on the TSX on the grant date.
As at January 28, 2022, SLF Inc. had 586,046,796 common shares, 2,981,710 options to acquire SLF Inc. common shares and 52,200,000 Class A Shares outstanding.
2. Capital Adequacy
OSFI has indicated that it will review the effectiveness of the LICAT guideline and update it to keep abreast of development in the life insurance industry and evolving risk measurement and management practices.
SLF Inc.
SLF Inc. is a non-operating insurance company and was subject to OSFI's LICAT guideline as at December 31, 2021. In accordance with this guideline, SLF Inc. manages its capital in a manner commensurate with its risk profile and control environment, and SLF Inc.'s regulated subsidiaries comply with the capital adequacy requirements imposed in the jurisdictions in which they operate. SLF Inc.'s consolidated capital position is above its internal target. As at December 31, 2021, SLF Inc.'s LICAT ratio was 145%. For additional information, refer to section F - Financial Strength in this document.
Sun Life Assurance
Sun Life Assurance, SLF Inc.'s principal operating life insurance subsidiary in Canada, was subject to OSFI's LICAT guideline as at December 31, 2021. With a LICAT ratio of 124% as at December 31, 2021, Sun Life Assurance's capital ratio is well above OSFI's supervisory ratio of 100% and regulatory minimum ratio of 90%. The LICAT guideline uses a risk-based approach for measuring specific life insurer risks and for aggregating the results to calculate the amount of a life insurer's regulatory required capital to support these risks. Certain of these risk components, along with available capital, are sensitive to changes in equity markets and interest rates as outlined in the section J - Risk Management of this document. For additional information, refer to section F - Financial Strength in this document.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 49
The following table shows the components of Sun Life Assurance's LICAT ratio for 2021 and 2020.
Sun Life Assurance LICAT Ratio
| | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | 2021 | 2020 |
| Capital resources | | |
| Retained earnings and contributed surplus | 15,934 | 14,630 |
| Adjusted accumulated other comprehensive income | 811 | 1,397 |
| Common and preferred shares | 7,285 | 5,945 |
| Innovative capital instruments and subordinated debt | 350 | 350 |
| Other | 252 | 229 |
| Less: | | |
| Goodwill | 2,370 | 2,393 |
| Non-life investments and other | 2,826 | 2,350 |
| Available capital | 19,436 | 17,808 |
| Surplus allowance and eligible deposits | 10,383 | 10,575 |
| Total Capital resources | 29,819 | 28,383 |
| Capital requirements | | |
| Credit, market and insurance risks | 24,292 | 22,353 |
| Less: Diversification and other credits | 4,446 | 4,106 |
| Segregated fund guarantee risk | 872 | 904 |
| Operational risk | 2,101 | 2,054 |
| Total before scalar | 22,819 | 21,205 |
| Base solvency buffer (Total before scalar x 1.05) | 23,960 | 22,265 |
| | |
| LICAT ratio | 124% | 127% |
Foreign Life Insurance Companies
Foreign subsidiaries and foreign operations of SLF Inc. must comply with local capital or solvency requirements in the jurisdictions in which they operate. Our operations maintained capital levels above the minimum local regulatory requirements during 2021 and 2020. Additional information on capital and regulatory requirements for our foreign subsidiaries and foreign operations is provided in SLF Inc.'s AIF under the heading Regulatory Matters.
As at December 31, 2021, we have two internal reinsurance arrangements with affiliated reinsurance companies, in Delaware and Michigan, relating to our closed block of individual universal life insurance products with no-lapse guarantee benefits issued in the U.S. The Delaware reinsurance structure was established in 2013 and finances excess U.S. statutory reserves for certain universal life policies issued between January 2000 and February 2006. The financing of U.S. statutory reserve requirements in excess of those required under IFRS for the Delaware reinsurance company is supported by a guarantee from SLF Inc. The Michigan reinsurance structure was established in 2007 for certain policies issued between March 2006 and December 2008. The entity was redomesticated from Vermont to Michigan in 2020. Under the Michigan reinsurance structure, the related excess U.S. statutory reserve requirements are similarly supported by a guarantee from SLF Inc.
3. Shareholder Dividends
The declaration, amount and payment of dividends by SLF Inc. is subject to the approval of our Board and is dependent on our results of operations, our reported net income, financial condition, cash requirements and contractual restrictions. Capital management activities, as well as regulatory considerations and macro-economic factors including the economic outlook for the jurisdictions in which we do business, are also considered along with other factors. The Board reviews the level of dividends on a quarterly basis.
A regular and appropriate level of dividend payout and growth provides a stable source of return to common shareholders.
We target an underlying dividend payout ratio of between 40% and 50% based on underlying EPS.
During 2021, our dividend payout ratio to common shareholders based on our reported EPS was 35% and on an underlying EPS basis was 38%.
Total common shareholder dividends declared in 2021 were $2.310 per share, compared to $2.200 in 2020.
On March 13, 2020, OSFI set the expectation for all federally regulated financial institutions that dividend increases and share buybacks should be halted. On November 4, 2021, OSFI lifted this restriction on the basis that these restrictions were no longer considered necessary.
50 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Dividends declared
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amount per share | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| Common shares | 2.310 | | 2.200 | | 2.100 | |
| Class A preferred shares | | | |
Series 1(1) | 0.890625 | | 1.187500 | | 1.187500 | |
Series 2(1) | 0.900000 | | 1.200000 | | 1.200000 | |
| Series 3 | 1.112500 | | 1.112500 | | 1.112500 | |
| Series 4 | 1.112500 | | 1.112500 | | 1.112500 | |
| Series 5 | 1.125000 | | 1.125000 | | 1.125000 | |
| | | |
Series 8R(2)(3) | 0.456250 | | 0.512500 | | 0.568800 | |
Series 9QR(4) | 0.382421 | | 0.583985 | | 0.772500 | |
Series 10R(2)(5) | 0.718313 | | 0.710500 | | 0.710500 | |
Series 11QR(6) | 0.572421 | | 0.774505 | | 0.962500 | |
Series 12R(7) | 0.951500 | | 0.951500 | | 0.951500 | |
(1)Series 1 and 2 Shares were redeemed on September 30, 2021.
(2)On the earliest redemption date and every five years thereafter, the dividend rate will reset to an annual rate equal to the 5-year Government of Canada bond yield plus a yield specified for each series. The specified yield for Class A shares is: Series 8R - 1.41% and Series 10R - 2.17%. On the earliest redemption date and every five years thereafter, holders will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into the series that is one number higher than their existing series.
(3)The dividend rate was reset on June 30, 2020 to a fixed annual dividend rate of 1.825% until the earliest redemption date June 30, 2025.
(4)Holders of the Series 9QR Shares are entitled to receive quarterly floating rate non-cumulative dividends at an annual rate equal to the then 3-month Government of Canada treasury bill yield plus 1.41%. Holders of the Series 9QR Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their Series 9QR Shares into Series 8R Shares on June 30, 2025 and on June 30 every five years thereafter.
(5)The dividend rate was reset on September 30, 2021 to a fixed annual dividend rate of 2.967% until the earliest redemption date September 30, 2026.
(6)Holders of the Series 11QR Shares are entitled to receive quarterly floating rate non-cumulative dividends at an annual rate equal to the then 3-month Government of Canada treasury bill yield plus 2.17%. Holders of the Series 11QR Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their Series 11QR Shares into Series 10R Shares on September 30, 2026 and on September 30 every five years thereafter.
(7)The dividend rate was reset on December 31, 2016 to a fixed annual dividend rate of 3.806% until the earliest redemption date December 31, 2021. Series 12R Shares were redeemed on December 31, 2021.
4. Principal Sources and Uses of Funds
Our primary source of funds is cash provided by operating activities, including premiums, investment management fees and net investment income. These funds are used primarily to pay policy benefits, dividends to policyholders, claims, commissions, operating expenses, interest expenses and shareholder dividends. Excess cash flows generated from operating activities are generally invested to support future payment requirements. We also raise funds from time to time, through borrowing and issuing of securities, to finance growth, acquisitions or other needs.
As at December 31, 2021, we maintained net cash, cash equivalents and short-term securities totaling $12.1 billion. In addition to providing for near-term funding commitments, cash, cash equivalents and short-term securities include amounts that support short-term payment obligations.
Net cash, cash equivalents and short-term securities decreased by $1.4 billion in 2021 compared to 2020. The table below outlines our principal sources and uses of cash.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| ($ millions) | | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| Net cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | | | 10,648 | | 6,685 | |
| Cash flows provided by (used in): | | | | | | |
| Operating activities | | | | | (1,857) | | 7,253 | |
| Investing activities | | | | | (803) | | (886) | |
| Financing activities | | | | | (260) | | (2,312) | |
| Changes due to fluctuations in exchange rates | | | | | (35) | | (92) | |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | | | (2,955) | | 3,963 | |
| Net cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | | | | 7,693 | | 10,648 | |
| Short-term securities, end of period | | | | | 4,452 | | 2,873 | |
| Net cash, cash equivalents and short-term securities, end of period | | | | | 12,145 | | 13,521 | |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 51
5. Liquidity
We generally maintain an overall asset liquidity profile that exceeds requirements to fund insurance contract liabilities under prescribed adverse liability demand scenarios. To strengthen our liquidity further, we actively manage and monitor our:
•Capital levels
•Asset levels
•Matching position
•Diversification and credit quality of investments
•Cash forecasts and actual amounts against established targets
We are subject to various regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The ability of SLF Inc.'s subsidiaries to pay dividends and transfer funds is regulated in certain jurisdictions and may require local regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of specific conditions in certain circumstances. Through effective cash management and capital planning, SLF Inc. ensures that its subsidiaries, as a whole and on a stand-alone basis, are properly funded and maintain adequate liquidity to meet obligations, both individually and in aggregate.
SLF Inc. and its wholly-owned holding companies had $4.7 billion in cash and other liquid assets(1)(2) as at December 31, 2021. See section F - Financial Strength in this document for more information.
We maintain various credit facilities for general corporate purposes, as set out in the table below. Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in Canadian dollars.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 |
| Credit Facility | Amount | Utilized | Expiry | Amount | Utilized | Expiry |
| Committed | US | $ | 400 | | US | $ | 12 | | 2025 | US | $ | 400 | | US | $ | 12 | | 2022 | |
| Committed | US | $ | 1,000 | | US | $ | 349 | | 2023 | US | $ | 1,000 | | US | $ | 266 | | 2021 |
| Uncommitted | US | $ | 100 | | US | $ | — | | n/a | US | $ | 100 | | US | $ | — | | n/a |
| Uncommitted | | $ | 225 | | | $ | 81 | | n/a | | $ | 228 | | | $ | 97 | | n/a |
| Uncommitted | US | $ | 25 | | US | $ | 7 | | n/a | US | $ | 25 | | US | $ | 7 | | n/a |
The agreements relating to our committed credit facilities contain typical covenants for investment grade companies regarding solvency, credit ratings and financial strength, all of which were met as at December 31, 2021. These covenants include, but are not limited to, the maintenance of total equity by SLF Inc. of at least $12 billion, tested as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. SLF Inc.'s total equity was $28.1 billion as at December 31, 2021.
Our failure to comply with the covenants under the committed credit facility would, subject to grace periods in the case of certain covenants, result in an event of default. This could require us to repay any outstanding borrowings or to cash collateralize letters of credit under the facility. A failure by SLF Inc. (or any of its subsidiaries) to pay an obligation due for an amount exceeding $250 million would also result in an event of default under the committed credit facility described above.
Based on our historical cash flows and liquidity management processes, we believe that the cash flows from our operating activities will continue to provide sufficient liquidity for us to satisfy debt service obligations and to pay other expenses as they fall due.
(1)This is a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(2)Includes $2.0 billion of proceeds from the subordinated debt offerings completed in November 2021, of which $1.5 billion is subject to contractual terms requiring us to redeem the underlying securities, in full, if the closing of the DentaQuest acquisition does not occur. These amounts will not qualify as LICAT capital until the acquisition closes.
52 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
1. Risk Management Framework
The Company has an established Risk Management Framework ("Risk Framework") approved by the Board that prescribes a comprehensive set of protocols and programs that need to be followed in conducting business activities. The risks that arise when providing products and services to Clients, which are in line with our Purpose to help our Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives, are managed within these protocols and programs. Effective risk management is critical to the overall profitability, competitive market positioning and long-term financial viability of the Company. While all risks cannot necessarily be eliminated or known with certainty, the Risk Framework seeks to ensure that risks to a business undertaking are appropriately managed to achieve the Company's business objectives over time and are not expected to exceed pre-established boundaries for risk taking. The Risk Framework, corporate strategy and business objectives are all aligned and risk management protocols and programs are embedded within every business segment.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 53
2. Risk Governance and Accountabilities
Our Risk Framework sets out lines of responsibility and authority for risk-taking, governance and control. These governance requirements are summarized below.
Board of Directors
The Board is responsible for ensuring the governance of all risks across the enterprise and has primary responsibility for taking action to ensure risk management policies, programs and practices are in place. By approving our Risk Framework and the Risk Appetite Policy and providing ongoing oversight of the risk management programs, the Board monitors that significant risks are appropriately identified and managed. The Board oversees business and strategic risk through review and approval of the business and strategic plans, and regularly discusses key themes, issues and risks emerging in connection with the design or implementation of these plans.
The Risk Committee is a standing committee of the Board whose primary functions are to assist the Board with oversight of the management of current and emerging risks enterprise-wide, and of the risk management function to ensure that management has in place programs, policies, processes and controls designed to identify and effectively manage the significant risks to which the Company is exposed and has sufficient capital to underpin those risks. It reviews and approves all risk management policies and reviews compliance with those policies. In addition, where the Board has delegated risk oversight to other committees of the Board ("Board Committees"), the Risk Committee provides the Board with an integrated view of oversight of risk management across all Board committees. The Risk Committee regularly monitors the Company's risk profile to ensure it is within the agreed risk appetite and that the Company's capital position exceeds regulatory capital requirements, monitors and recommends to the Board for approval, the specific risk limits allocated to the businesses and the annual Capital Plan. The Risk Committee also oversees risk management activities of our subsidiaries and risks posed to the Company through its joint ventures.
The Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee ("GICRC") of the Board is responsible for assisting the Board in developing effective corporate governance guidelines and processes, including processes to assess the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees. It reviews and monitors the Company's Investment Plan and investment performance and oversees investment practices, procedures and controls related to the management of the general fund investment portfolio. It assists the Board with its oversight over the Corporation’s sustainability reporting and Sustainability Plan. In addition, the GICRC meets with the senior business and functional leaders who have first-line responsibility for compliance and compliance management programs, oversees the effectiveness of the second-line compliance function, oversees compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the identification and management of compliance risk, and oversees the development of policies and processes to sustain ethical behaviour.
The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for assisting the Board in overseeing the integrity of financial statements and related information provided to shareholders and other stakeholders, compliance with financial regulatory requirements, adequacy and effectiveness of the internal controls implemented and maintained by management, and assessing the qualifications, independence and performance of the external auditor.
The Management Resources Committee of the Board is responsible for assisting the Board with oversight of succession planning for senior executive positions and programs to effectively attract, retain, develop and reward employees. It provides guidance to management on advancing the talent
54 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
agenda to achieve strategic objectives and foster Sun Life's culture. The Management Resources Committee reviews incentive designs and governance of material incentive programs against alignment with business objectives and avoiding excessive risk taking. It reviews the implications of key enterprise risks, including human resources risks pertaining to compensation design and human resources practices. In addition, the Management Resources Committee reviews compensation matters, including the remuneration of executives who have a material impact on the risk exposure of the Company.
Senior Management Committees
The Executive Risk Committee ("ERC") provides executive management oversight of the Company's enterprise risk management activities. This includes the review and articulation of the risk appetite, review that the risk profile is within the agreed risk appetite and policies, processes and controls are in place to identify and effectively manage the significant risks in accordance with the risk appetite and the overall objective of promoting a balanced business and product model to achieve agreed upon risk-adjusted returns and allocate capital accordingly.
The Investment & Credit Risk Committee is responsible for reviewing matters related to the management of the Company's general fund assets which includes providing oversight and direction on the current and potential credit and investment risk exposures facing the Company and mitigating strategies to ensure that effective credit risk management practices and controls are in place.
The Corporate Asset Liability Management Committee is responsible for providing executive oversight and direction for the effective measurement, control and management of the market and liquidity risks in the design and operation of general fund investment strategies for efficiently discharging the Company's general fund liabilities.
The Operational Risk & Compliance Committee is responsible for providing oversight of the Company's operational and compliance risk management practices, current and emerging operational risk exposures, and the processes to ensure ongoing identification of significant operational and compliance risks facing the Company.
The Insurance Risk Committee is responsible for providing oversight and direction on insurance risk exposures facing the Company and to ensure that effective insurance risk management practices and controls are in place. This includes reviewing the current and projected insurance risk profile against limits; engaging in review of topical insurance, reinsurance and underwriting risk issues; and reviewing and recommending changes to the insurance risk measurement methodology to the ERC.
Accountabilities
Primary accountability for risk management is delegated by the Board to our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), and the CEO further delegates responsibilities throughout the Company through management authorities and responsibilities. The CEO delegates accountability for the various classes of risk management to our executive officers, who are accountable for ensuring that the management of risks in the scope of their business accountability is in accordance with the Board-approved Risk Framework, Risk Appetite Policy and risk management policies.
3. Risk Universe
As a large financial services organization operating in a complex industry, the Company encounters a variety of risks and uncertainties. We face risks in formulating our business strategy and business objectives, in carrying on our business activities in the pursuit of our strategy and objectives, and from external factors such as changes in the economic, political, competitive, regulatory and environmental landscapes. We are subject to financial and insurance risks that are connected to our liabilities and with the management and performance of our assets, including how we match returns from assets with the payment of liabilities to our Clients. Each of these risks is also considered from the perspective of different types of uncertainties under which either the outcomes and/or their probabilities of occurrence are unknown. The Risk Framework covers all risks and these have been grouped into six major categories: credit, market, insurance, business and strategic, operational and liquidity risks. The Risk Framework sets out the key risk management processes in the areas of risk: appetite, identification, measurement, management, monitoring and reporting. The Risk Framework sets out both qualitative and quantitative measures and processes to control the risk the Company will bear in respect of each of these categories of risk and in aggregate.
4. Risk Appetite
Our Risk Appetite Policy defines the amount and type of risk we are willing to accept in pursuit of our business objectives, and is approved by the Board. It is forward-looking and our strategic plan, capital plan, business plan and business objectives are established within its boundaries.
The Company's risk appetite seeks to balance the various needs, expectations, risk and reward perspectives and investment horizons of key stakeholders. In particular, our risk appetite supports the pursuit of shareholder value while ensuring that the Company's ability to pay claims and fulfill policyholder commitments is not compromised.
The Company's risk appetite is the primary mechanism to operationalize its risk philosophy and the boundaries of permissible risk-taking across the enterprise. It ensures that business activities are assessed against performance criteria that are appropriately risk-adjusted. Our risk appetite supports the objective of maintaining adequate capital, managing return on equity, managing earnings volatility, managing operational risk and managing liquidity. To accomplish this, our risk appetite includes a wide array of qualitative and quantitative standards that reflect the Company's overall risk management principles and values.
We generally accept diversifiable risks and utilize risk pooling to create portfolios with relatively low liability volatility. We take risk where we have internal expertise such as actuarial, underwriting, claims management, investment or distribution or where reinsurance partners are able to supplement our internal expertise. We prefer risks where it is possible to diversify across various segments including products, geographies, distribution channels or asset classes in order to maximize diversification opportunities.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 55
Our Risk Appetite Policy sets out specific constraints which define the aggregate level of risk that the Company is willing to accept. We translate our risk appetite constraints into specific risk limits by risk class and business segment. Our risk profile is measured, managed and monitored regularly to ensure that we operate within our risk appetite. Our risk appetite limits are reviewed periodically to reflect the risks and opportunities inherent in our evolving business strategies and operating environment.
5. Risk Management Policies
In order to support the effective communication, implementation and governance of our Risk Framework, we have codified our processes and operational requirements in a comprehensive series of risk management policies and operating guidelines. These policies and guidelines promote the application of a consistent approach to managing risk exposures across our global business platform. The Board and Board Committees regularly review and approve significant changes to the risk management policies and regularly review management's reporting and attestation on compliance to these policies.
6. Risk Management Process
The risk management process as set out in our Risk Framework is described below:
Risk Identification and Measurement
All business segments employ a common approach to identify and measure risks. Business segments have accountability for identifying and managing risks facing their business. We have a process to identify and monitor emerging risks that may have a material impact on our finances, operations or reputation. We evaluate potential correlations and inter-connections between various risk events and categories, and monitor emerging risks, regulatory and rating agency requirements, and industry developments.
Risk measurement involves determining and evaluating potential risk exposures, and includes a number of techniques such as monitoring key risk indicators, assessing probability and severity of risks, and conducting stress testing.
A robust stress testing program is an essential component of the Company's Risk Framework used to measure, monitor and mitigate the Company's risk exposures and to ensure ongoing capital adequacy under plausible stress events. Stress testing is performed on key metrics such as earnings, regulatory capital ratios and liquidity to identify and monitor potential vulnerabilities to key risk drivers and ensure that the Company is operating within its risk appetite.
We develop and test a range of scenarios based on our internal assessment and regulatory guidance. Sensitivity testing is conducted on a regular basis and measures the earnings and regulatory capital impact from changes in underlying risk factors. Sensitivity testing is performed for individual risks and for consolidated risk exposures at different levels of stress and at various levels of aggregation. Scenario testing involves changes to a number of risk factors to assess the impact of and interaction between these risk factors. These scenarios include integrated scenario testing, reverse scenario testing and key assumption sensitivity testing. We also use the Financial Condition Testing ("FCT") process, as prescribed by the Canadian Institute of Actuaries, to satisfy requirements under the Canadian insurance Company Act, and OSFI regulations, to annually stress test capital.
Risk Management, Monitoring and Reporting
Risk management decisions are formed by evaluating whether the assessed risk for a business activity aligns to our risk appetite and meets the objective of risk-adjusted return.
Monitoring processes include oversight by the Board, which is exercised through Board Committees and senior management committees described in the Risk Governance and Accountabilities section in this document.
Senior management committees, Board Committees and the Board regularly review reports that summarize our risk profile against the Board approved risk appetite, including the exposures across our principal risks, any changes in risk trends, forward-looking view of risks and emerging risks. These committees also review the effectiveness of the risk management strategies presented in the reports. On a regular basis, the Board and the Board Committees review and approve any significant changes to key policies for the management of risk and review compliance with these policies.
7. Three Lines of Defence
The Company has adopted the Three Lines of Defence ("LOD") model to provide a consistent, transparent and clearly documented allocation of accountability and segregation of functional responsibilities. This segregation of responsibility helps to establish a robust control framework that promotes transparent and independent challenge of all risk taking activities, and that encourages all functions to engage in self-critical examination to foster continuous improvement of the management of risk in our business.
The first line of defence is represented by the business segment management who own the risks that are intrinsic to the business and have the primary responsibility to identify, measure, manage, monitor and report these risks. Some of the first LOD risk related responsibilities include:
•Identification of key and emerging risks;
•Manage, measure, monitor and report on risk within their business operations;
•Accountability for business results and the risks taken to achieve those results; and
•Operating within risk appetite and according to risk management policies.
The second line of defence includes the Chief Risk Officer ("CRO") and various functional heads who are responsible for providing independent oversight of our Company-wide risk management programs. The CRO is responsible for developing our Risk Framework and Risk Appetite Policy, and for overseeing the development and implementation of risk management strategies aimed at optimizing the risk-return profile of the Company. The
56 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
CRO is supported by a network of business segment risk officers. The functional heads support the CRO in the implementation and communication of our Risk Framework and Risk Appetite Policy. Some of the key second LOD risk related responsibilities include:
•Establishment of the risk management framework and policies;
•Providing oversight and effective independent challenge of first line current and emerging risks; and
•Independent reporting to senior management committees and the Board on the level of risk appetite.
The third line of defence responsibilities are distinct from first and second LOD responsibilities. The Internal Audit function is the third LOD and is responsible for providing independent assurance to management, the Audit Committee, the Risk Committee and OSFI on the design and operational effectiveness of the risk management practices and internal controls carried out by first LOD and second LOD. Internal Audit provides a quarterly opinion on the effectiveness of internal controls, risk management and governance processes to the Risk Committee. In addition, the Risk Committee may engage third-party independent reviews to supplement the third LOD review of the effectiveness of the Company's risk management programs.
8. Risk Culture and Philosophy
We have built a strong corporate culture on a foundation of ethical behaviour, high business standards, integrity and respect. The Board establishes the "tone from the top" and is accountable to ensure that the CEO and senior management create and sustain a culture of integrity throughout the organization. We work together through our focus on diversity, equity and inclusion and sustainability to fulfill our Purpose of helping our Clients to achieve lifetime financial security and to live healthier lives.
Risk culture relates to how we behave and respond, in addition to the requirements we set. It enables and rewards taking the right risks in an informed manner. It enables effective challenge and transparency regarding risks and outcomes without fear of reprisal. It drives us to understand Client needs and preferences so that we can act in their best interests. In order to support employees in fulfilling their role, we have taken action to ensure our risk protocols and procedures are well defined and embedded in our day-to-day business activities, assess that appropriate resources and training are provided, establish and communicate a common risk philosophy and a high bar for integrity and conduct, and encourage every employee to openly identify risk exposures and communicate escalating risk concerns. The following six elements support our Risk Culture:
•Establishing tone from the top;
•Encouraging transparency in risk-taking;
•Performing effective challenge in conducting business decisions;
•Aligning incentives and risk management practices;
•Effectively communicating the risk culture expectations; and
•Establishing clear accountabilities.
A key premise of our culture is that all employees have an important role to play in managing the Company's risks. Risk Management is embedded in the Company's culture, which encourages ownership and responsibility for risk management at all levels. Our compensation programs are aligned to the organization's risk management practices through our governance structure for the design and approval of incentive compensation plans and processes used to support the alignment of compensation and risk management. We continuously reinforce and embed the culture through communication and training on risk culture elements at various forums and across various levels through training on the Code of Conduct annually, reinforcing accountability through performance reviews and compensation, and through defining roles, responsibilities and expectations in the risk management policies.
The Company's risk philosophy includes the following core principles:
Strategic Alignment
Our corporate strategy and business objectives are required to be established within the boundaries set out in the Risk Framework and the Risk Appetite Policy. This requires us to consider whether a business activity will result in a risk profile that we are willing to accept and which we are prepared to manage. We have established a range of explicit risk appetite limits and control points for credit, market, insurance, operational and liquidity risks. Business and strategic risk is managed through our strategic and business planning process and through controls over the implementation of these strategic and business plans. Risks associated with activities outside our risk appetite or outside the acceptable defined risks are avoided.
Stakeholder Interests
Our Risk Appetite Policy considers the interests of a large number of key stakeholders, including Clients, policyholders, shareholders, debt-holders, employees, regulators, distributors, rating agencies and other capital markets participants. The policy describes how to balance the needs, expectations, risk and reward perspectives, and investment horizons of these different stakeholders.
Effective risk management requires that objectives and incentives be aligned to ensure management's decisions are consistent with the Company's risk philosophy and risk appetite. To ensure this, the business plans and strategies are independently tested to ensure that they operate within the boundaries and requirements set out in the Risk Framework and the Risk Appetite Policy, and the results of this testing are reported to the Board. Compensation programs for employees are approved by the Board and the Board Committees and are aligned with the Company's risk philosophy, values, business and risk management strategies, and the long-term interests of stakeholders. In establishing annual performance objectives, we consider risk management goals to ensure that business decisions are consistent with the desired risk and return profile of the Company.
Capability Alignment
We seek out profitable risk-taking opportunities in those areas where we have established risk management skills and capabilities. Conversely, we endeavour to avoid or transfer risks that are beyond our risk-taking capability. Our ability to measure and evaluate risks, the quality of our risk governance and control environment, the depth and quality of our risk responses and the robustness of our pricing strategies are particularly important capabilities that we assess.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 57
Portfolio Perspective
In evaluating a particular risk, consideration is given to a portfolio perspective of risk and return including the explicit recognition of the impacts of diversification and concentration and how different risks interact with each other. This perspective is extended to the development of risk mitigation and pricing strategies, recognizing that often the most cost-effective way of managing risk involves utilizing available relationships already inherent in our business.
Risk-Adjusted Returns
The financial return metrics which are used to assess business activities are required to be risk-adjusted. Financial return metrics are developed in consideration of the constraints set out in the Risk Appetite Policy, and reflect the expected costs of mitigation and the cost of risk capital required to support the risk taking activity.
Culture
Culture is the sum of the shared assumptions, values and beliefs that create the unique character of an organization. Our culture encourages behaviour aligned with goals for long-term value creation. It defines the appropriate behaviour for any given situation, governs the interaction with Clients and affects how employees identify with the organization. Our company culture has significant potential to impact our risk profile. An organization's culture impacts its ability to create value and to protect value. Maintaining the right balance of risk-taking and risk control activities is a key organizational capability and fundamental to our long-term sustainable success.
9. Risk Categories
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The shaded text and tables in the following section of this MD&A represent our disclosure on credit, market and liquidity risks in accordance with IFRS 7 Financial Instruments - Disclosures and includes a discussion on how we measure risk and our objectives, policies and methodologies for managing these risks. The shaded text and tables represent an integral part of our audited annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2021. The shading in this section does not imply that these disclosures are of any greater importance than non-shaded tables |
| and text, and the Risk Management disclosure should be read in its entirely. | This information should be considered carefully together with other |
information in this MD&A and in the 2021 AIF, our Consolidated Financial Statements and other reports and materials that we file with securities regulators. |
| | | | |
| In this section, segregated funds include segregated fund guarantees, variable annuities and investment products, and includes Run-off reinsurance in Corporate. |
Our Risk Framework groups all risks into six major risk categories: market, insurance, credit, business and strategic, operational and liquidity risks.
i. Market Risk
Risk Description
We are exposed to financial and capital market risk, which is defined as the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of an insurance contract or financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes or volatility in market prices. Market risk includes equity, interest rate and spread, real estate and foreign currency risks.
Market Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of market risk management practices and controls as outlined below:
•Market risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Risk Committee.
•Risk appetite limits have been established for equity, interest rate, real estate and foreign currency risks.
•Income and regulatory capital sensitivities are monitored, managed and reported against pre-established risk limits.
•Comprehensive asset-liability management and hedging policies, programs and practices are in place.
•Regulatory solvency requirements include risk-based capital requirements and are monitored regularly.
•Product Design and Pricing Policy requires a detailed risk assessment and pricing provisions for material risks.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse market movements.
•Insurance contract liabilities are established in accordance with Canadian actuarial standards of practice.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
Specific market risks and our risk management strategies are discussed below in further detail.
Equity Risk
Equity risk is the potential for financial loss arising from declines or volatility in equity market prices. We are exposed to equity risk from a number of sources. A portion of our exposure to equity risk arises in connection with benefit guarantees on segregated fund products. These benefit guarantees may be triggered upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization. The cost of providing these guarantees is uncertain and depends upon a number of factors, including general capital market conditions, our hedging strategies, policyholder behaviour and mortality experience, each of which may result in negative impacts on net income and capital.
58 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
We generate revenue in our asset management businesses and from certain insurance and annuity contracts where fees are levied on account balances that are affected directly by equity market levels. Accordingly, we have further exposure to equity risk as adverse fluctuations in the market value of such assets will result in corresponding adverse impacts on our revenue and net income. In addition, declining and volatile equity markets may have a negative impact on sales and redemptions (surrenders) in these businesses, and this may result in further adverse impacts on our net income and financial position.
We also have direct exposure to equity markets from the investments supporting other general account liabilities, surplus, and employee benefit plans. These exposures fall within our risk-taking philosophy and appetite, and are therefore generally not hedged.
| | |
Interest Rate and Spread Risk Interest rate and spread risk is the potential for financial loss arising from changes or volatility in interest rates or spreads when asset cash flows and the policy obligations they support are not matched. This may result in the need to either sell assets to meet policy payments and expenses or reinvest excess asset cash flows in unfavourable interest rate or spread environments. The impact of changes or volatility in interest rates or spreads is reflected in the valuation of our financial assets and liabilities for insurance contracts.
Our primary exposure to interest rate and spread risk arises from certain general account products and segregated fund contracts which contain investment guarantees in the form of minimum crediting rates, guaranteed premium rates, settlement options and benefit guarantees. If investment returns fall below guaranteed levels, we may be required to increase liabilities or capital in respect of these contracts. The guarantees attached to these products may be applicable to both past premiums collected and future premiums not yet received. Segregated fund contracts provide benefit guarantees that are linked to underlying fund performance and may be triggered upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization. These products are included in our asset-liability management program and the residual interest rate exposure is managed within our risk appetite limits.
Declines in interest rates or narrowing spreads can result in compression of the net spread between interest earned on investments and interest credited to policyholders. Declines in interest rates or narrowing spreads may also result in increased asset calls, mortgage prepayments, and net reinvestment of positive cash flows at lower yields, and therefore adversely impact our profitability and financial position. Negative interest rates may additionally result in losses on our cash deposits and low or negative returns on our fixed income assets impacting our profitability. In contrast, increases in interest rates or a widening of spreads may have a material impact on the value of fixed income assets, resulting in depressed market values, and may lead to lower LICAT ratios or losses in the event of the liquidation of assets prior to maturity.
Significant changes or volatility in interest rates or spreads could have a negative impact on sales of certain insurance and annuity products, and adversely impact the expected pattern of redemptions (surrenders) on existing policies. Increases in interest rates or widening spreads may increase the risk that policyholders will surrender their contracts, potentially forcing us to liquidate assets at a loss and accelerate recognition of certain acquisition expenses. While we have established hedging programs in place and our insurance and annuity products often contain surrender mitigation features, these may not be sufficient to fully offset the adverse impact of the underlying losses.
We also have direct exposure to interest rates and spreads from investments supporting other general account liabilities, surplus and employee benefit plans. Lower interest rates or a narrowing of spreads will result in reduced investment income on new fixed income asset purchases. Conversely, higher interest rates or wider spreads will reduce the value of our existing assets. These exposures fall within our risk-taking philosophy and appetite and are therefore generally not hedged. |
A sustained low interest rate environment may adversely impact our earnings, regulatory capital requirements and our ability to implement our business strategy and plans in several ways, including:
•Lower sales of certain insurance and wealth products, which can in turn pressure our operating expense levels;
•Shifts in the expected pattern of redemptions (surrenders) on existing policies;
•Higher new business strain reflecting lower new business profitability;
•Reduced return on new fixed income asset purchases, and higher hedging costs;
•The impact of changes in actuarial assumptions;
•Impairment of goodwill; and
•Additional valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets.
| | |
Market Risk Sensitivities |
|
We utilize a variety of methods and measures to quantify our market risk exposures. These include duration management, key rate duration techniques, convexity measures, cash flow gap analysis, scenario testing, and sensitivity testing of earnings and regulatory capital ratios versus risk appetite limits. |
|
Our net income(1) is affected by the determination of policyholder obligations under our annuity and insurance contracts. These amounts are determined using internal valuation models and are recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements, primarily as Insurance contract liabilities. The determination of these obligations requires management to make assumptions about the future level of equity market performance, interest rates, credit and swap spreads and other factors over the life of our products. Differences between our actual experience and our best estimate assumptions are reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Additional Cautionary Language and Key Assumptions Related to Sensitivities in this section for important additional information regarding these estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
(1) Net income in section J - Risk Management in this document refers to common shareholders' net income. |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 59
The market value of our investments in fixed income and equity securities fluctuates based on movements in interest rates and equity markets. The market value of fixed income assets designated as AFS that are held primarily in our surplus segment increases with declining interest rates and decreases with rising interest rates. The market value of equities designated as AFS and held primarily in our surplus segment increases with rising equity markets and decreases with declining equity markets. Changes in the market value of AFS assets flow through OCI and are only recognized in net income when realized upon sale, or when considered impaired. The sale or impairment of AFS assets held in surplus can therefore have the effect of modifying our net income sensitivity.
In 2021, we realized $146 million (pre-tax), in net gains on the sale of AFS assets ($169 million(1) pre-tax in 2020). The net unrealized gains (losses) within our Accumulated OCI position on AFS fixed income and equity assets were $137 million and $129 million, respectively, net of tax, as at December 31, 2021 ($556 million and $76 million, respectively, net of tax, as at December 31, 2020).
During the fourth quarter of 2021, we realized $5 million (pre-tax), in net gains on the sale of AFS assets ($20 million pre-tax in the fourth quarter of 2020).
Equity Market Sensitivities
The following table sets out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our net income and OCI and Sun Life Assurance's LICAT ratio to certain instantaneous changes in equity market prices as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
It is important to note that these estimates are illustrative and performance of our segregated fund dynamic hedging program may differ as actual
equity-related exposures vary from broad market indices (the impact of active management, basis risk, and other factors) and higher or lower
volatility level than assumed.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ millions, unless otherwise noted) As at December 31, 2021 |
Change in Equity Markets(1) | 25% decrease | 10% decrease | 10% increase | 25% increase |
Potential impact on net income(2)(3) | | $ | (400) | | | $ | (150) | | | $ | 150 | | | $ | 350 | |
Potential impact on OCI(3) | | $ | (150) | | | $ | (50) | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | 150 | |
Potential impact on LICAT(2)(4) | 0.5% point decrease | 0.0% point change | 0.0% point change | 0.5% point increase |
| | | | | | | |
($ millions, unless otherwise noted) As at December 31, 2020 |
Change in Equity Markets(1) | 25% decrease | 10% decrease | 10% increase | 25% increase |
Potential impact on net income(2)(3) | | $ | (400) | | | $ | (150) | | | $ | 150 | | | $ | 300 | |
Potential impact on OCI(3) | | $ | (50) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 50 | |
Potential impact on LICAT(2)(4) | 0.0% point change | 0.0% point change | 0.0% point change | 0.5% point decrease |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Represents the respective change across all equity markets as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Assumes that actual equity exposures consistently and precisely track the broader equity markets. Since in actual practice equity-related exposures generally differ from broad market indices (due to the impact of active management, basis risk, and other factors), realized sensitivities may differ significantly from those illustrated above. Sensitivities include the impact of re-balancing equity hedges for dynamic hedging programs at 2% intervals (for 10% changes in equity markets) and at 5% intervals (for 25% changes in equity markets). |
(2) The market risk sensitivities include the estimated mitigation impact of our hedging programs in effect as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, and include new business added and product changes implemented prior to such dates. |
(3) Net income and OCI sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $50 million. The sensitivities exclude the market impacts on the income from our joint ventures and associates, which we account for on an equity basis. |
(4) The LICAT sensitivities illustrate the impact on Sun Life Assurance as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The sensitivities assume that a scenario switch does not occur in the quarter. LICAT ratios are rounded in increments of 0.5%. |
(1)Amount excludes net gains of $282 million relating to the impact from the repayment of our senior financing obligation. Including the net gains from the impact of the repayment of our senior financing obligation, we realized $451 million pre-tax in net gains on the sale of AFS assets in the third quarter of 2020. Our senior financing obligation related to U.S. statutory regulatory capital requirements for In-force Management. See section K - Additional Financial Disclosure in this document.
60 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Interest Rate Sensitivities
The following table sets out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our net income and OCI and Sun Life Assurance's LICAT ratio to certain instantaneous changes in interest rates as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Our LICAT sensitivities may be non-linear and can change due to the interrelationship between market rates and spreads, actuarial assumptions and our LICAT calculations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions, unless otherwise noted) | As at December 31, 2021 | As at December 31, 2020 |
Change in Interest Rates(1) | 50 basis point decrease | 50 basis point increase | 50 basis point decrease | 50 basis point increase |
Potential impact on net income(2)(3)(4) | | $ | (50) | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | (100) | | | $ | 100 | |
Potential impact on OCI(3) | | $ | 250 | | | $ | (250) | | | $ | 250 | | | $ | (250) | |
Potential impact on LICAT(2)(5) | 1.5% point increase | 0.5% point decrease | 3.5% point increase | 1.5% point decrease |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Interest rate sensitivities assume a parallel shift in assumed interest rates across the entire yield curve as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 with no change to the Actuarial Standards Board ("ASB") promulgated URR. Variations in realized yields based on factors such as different terms to maturity and geographies may result in realized sensitivities being significantly different from those illustrated above. Sensitivities include the impact of re-balancing interest rate hedges for dynamic hedging programs at 10 basis point intervals (for 50 basis point changes in interest rates). |
(2) The market risk sensitivities include the estimated mitigation impact of our hedging programs in effect as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, and include new business added and product changes implemented prior to such dates. |
(3) Net income and OCI sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $50 million. The sensitivities exclude the market impacts on the income from our joint ventures and associates, which we account for on an equity basis. |
(4) The majority of interest rate sensitivity, after hedging, is attributed to individual insurance products. We also have interest rate sensitivity, after hedging, from our fixed annuity and segregated funds products. |
(5) The LICAT sensitivities illustrate the impact on Sun Life Assurance as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The sensitivities assume that a scenario switch does not occur in the quarter. LICAT ratios are rounded in increments of 0.5%. |
| | |
The above sensitivities were determined using a 50 basis point change in interest rates and a 10% change in our equity markets because we believe that these market shocks were reasonably possible as at December 31, 2021. We have also disclosed the impact of a 25% change in equity markets to illustrate that significant changes in equity market levels may result in other than proportionate impacts on our sensitivities. |
| | |
Credit Spread and Swap Spread Sensitivities |
The credit spread sensitivities reflect the impact of changes in credit spreads on our asset and liability valuations (including non-sovereign fixed income assets, provincial governments, corporate bonds, and other fixed income assets). The swap spread sensitivities reflect the impact of changes in swap spreads on swap-based derivative positions and liability valuations. |
The following table sets out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our net income and Sun Life Assurance's LICAT ratio attributable to certain instantaneous changes in credit and swap spreads as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions, unless otherwise noted) | As at December 31, 2021 | As at December 31, 2020 |
Change in Credit Spreads(1) | 50 basis point decrease | 50 basis point increase | 50 basis point decrease | 50 basis point increase |
Potential impact on net income(2) | | $ | (75) | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | (125) | | | $ | 75 | |
Potential impact on LICAT(3) | 0.5% point decrease | 0.5% point increase | 0.5% point decrease | 0.5% point increase |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) In most instances, credit spreads are assumed to revert to long-term insurance contract liability assumptions generally over a five-year period. |
(2) Sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million. |
(3) The LICAT sensitivities illustrate the impact on Sun Life Assurance as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The sensitivities assume that a scenario switch does not occur in the quarter. LICAT ratios are rounded in increments of 0.5%. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions, unless otherwise noted) | As at December 31, 2021 | As at December 31,2020 |
Change in Swap Spreads | 20 basis point decrease | 20 basis point increase | 20 basis point decrease | 20 basis point increase |
Potential impact on net income(1) | | $ | 25 | | | $ | (25) | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | (50) | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1)Sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million. |
| | |
The credit and swap spread sensitivities assume a parallel shift in the indicated spreads across the entire term structure. Variations in realized spread changes based on different terms to maturity, geographies, asset classes and derivative types, underlying interest rate movements, and ratings may result in realized sensitivities being significantly different from those provided above. The credit spread sensitivity estimates exclude any credit spread impact that may arise in connection with asset positions held in segregated funds. Spread sensitivities are provided for the consolidated entity and may not be proportional across all reporting segments. Refer to Additional Cautionary Language and Key Assumptions Related to Sensitivities in this section for important additional information regarding these estimates. |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 61
LICAT Interest Rate Scenario Switch
The LICAT interest rate risk is assessed under four different interest rate scenarios, and the scenario leading to the highest capital requirement is chosen as the worst scenario for each geographic region as defined by the LICAT guideline. Changes and interaction between the level and term movements in interest rates and credit spreads can shift the interest rate scenario applied in the LICAT calculation causing a discontinuity where capital requirements change materially. In 2020, OSFI updated the LICAT guideline for interest rate risk requirements for participating businesses to be smoothed over six quarters. As a result, the actual impact to the LICAT ratio from participating businesses in any quarter will reflect the scenarios from current quarter as well as the prior five quarters and switching between the scenarios would have the effect of offsetting the previous impacts over time. As per OSFI's communication, this new treatment will remain in place until at least December 31, 2023. It should be noted that switching of the scenario can also change the direction of credit spread sensitivities.
Sun Life Assurance last experienced a switch in the interest rate scenario in North America in the second quarter of 2020. The total cumulative impact of that scenario switch for Sun Life Assurance was a reduction of four LICAT percentage points. No additional impact is expected should we remain on the current scenario.
SLF Inc. has experienced multiple scenario switches since the second quarter of 2020. In the fourth quarter of 2021, SLF Inc. experienced a scenario switch back to the less severe scenario, resulting in an increase in the LICAT ratio of approximately one percentage point. Over the last six quarters, SLF Inc. has been on the more severe scenario in three quarters and has been on the less severe scenario for three quarters. The cumulative impact to date has been a reduction of two LICAT percentage points and, assuming no further scenario switches, we expect to regain the two percentage points over the next six quarters.
Market Risk Management Strategies
Market risk is managed at all stages during the product life cycle including product design and development, ongoing review and positioning of our suite of products, and ongoing asset-liability management and hedge re-balancing.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We have implemented asset-liability management and hedging programs involving regular monitoring and adjustment of market risk exposures using assets, derivative instruments and repurchase agreements to maintain market risk exposures within our risk appetite. The general availability and cost of these hedging instruments may be adversely impacted by a number of factors including changes in interest rates, increased volatility in capital markets, and changes in the general market and regulatory environment within which these hedging programs operate. In particular, regulations for OTC derivatives could impose additional costs and could affect our hedging strategy. In addition, these programs may themselves expose us to other risks. |
Our market risk management strategies are developed based on policies and operating guidelines at the enterprise level, business segment level and product level. Liabilities having a similar risk profile are grouped together and a customized investment and hedging strategy is developed and implemented to optimize return within our risk appetite limits.
In general, market risk exposure is mitigated by the assets supporting our products. This includes holdings of fixed income assets such as bonds and mortgages. Derivative instruments may supplement these assets to reduce the risk from cash flow mismatches and mitigate the market risk associated with liability features and optionality. The following table sets out the use of derivatives across a number of our products as at December 31, 2021.
Asset-Liability Management Applications for Derivative Usage
The primary uses of derivatives are set out in the table below.
| | | | | | | | |
| Products/Application | Uses of Derivative | Derivatives Used |
| General asset-liability management - interest rate risk exposure for most insurance and annuity products | To manage the sensitivity of the duration gap between assets and liabilities to interest rate changes | Interest rate swaps, swaptions, floors and bond futures |
| Guarantees on insurance and annuity contracts - minimum interest rate guarantees, guaranteed surrender values and guaranteed annuitization options | To limit potential financial losses from significant reductions in asset earned rates relative to contract guarantees | Interest rate swaps, swaptions, floors and bond futures |
| Segregated fund guarantees | To manage the exposure of product guarantees sensitive to movement in equity market and interest rate levels and currency fluctuations | Put options, call options, futures and swaps on equity indices, interest rate swaps, bond futures, and foreign exchange forwards |
| Currency exposure in relation to asset-liability management | To reduce the sensitivity to currency fluctuations by matching the value and cash flows of specific assets denominated in one currency with the value and cash flows of the corresponding liabilities denominated in another currency | Currency swaps and forwards |
| Credit exposure | To replicate credit exposures and enhance investment returns | Credit default swaps |
62 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
General Account Insurance and Annuity Products
Most of our expected sensitivity to changes in interest rates and about three-quarters of our expected sensitivity to changes in equity markets are derived from our general account insurance and annuity products. We have implemented market risk management strategies to mitigate a portion of the market risk related to our general account insurance and annuity products.
Individual insurance products include universal life and other long-term life and health insurance products. Major sources of market risk exposure for individual insurance products include the reinvestment risk related to future premiums on regular premium policies, asset reinvestment risk on both regular premium and single premium policies and the guaranteed cost of insurance. Interest rate risk for individual insurance products is typically managed on a duration basis, within tolerance ranges set out in the applicable investment policy or guidelines. Targets and limits are established so that the level of residual exposure is commensurate with our risk appetite. Exposures are monitored frequently, and assets are re-balanced as necessary to maintain compliance within prescribed tolerances using a combination of assets and derivative instruments. A portion of the longer-term cash flows are backed with equities and real estate.
For participating insurance products and other insurance products with adjustability features, the investment strategy objective is to provide a total rate of return given a constant risk profile over the long term.
Fixed annuity products generally provide the policyholder with a guaranteed investment return or crediting rate. Interest rate risk for these products is typically managed on a duration basis, within tolerance ranges set out in the applicable investment guidelines. Targets and limits are established so that the level of residual exposure is commensurate with our risk appetite. Exposures are monitored frequently, and assets are re-balanced as necessary to maintain compliance within prescribed tolerances using a combination of fixed income assets and derivative instruments.
Certain insurance and annuity products contain minimum interest rate guarantees. Market risk management strategies are implemented to limit potential financial loss due to reductions in asset earned rates relative to contract guarantees. These typically involve the use of hedging strategies utilizing interest rate derivatives such as interest rate floors, swaps and swaptions.
Certain insurance and annuity products contain features which allow the policyholders to surrender their policy at book value. Market risk management strategies are implemented to limit the potential financial loss due to changes in interest rate levels and policyholder behaviour. These typically involve the use of dynamic hedging strategies and the purchase of interest rate swaptions.
Certain products have guaranteed minimum annuitization rates. Market risk management strategies are implemented to limit the potential financial loss and typically involve the use of fixed income assets, interest rate swaps, and swaptions.
Segregated Fund Guarantees
Approximately one-quarter of our equity market sensitivity and a small amount of interest rate risk sensitivity as at December 31, 2021 are derived from segregated fund products. These products provide benefit guarantees, which are linked to underlying fund performance and may be triggered upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization. The cost of providing these guarantees is uncertain and depends upon a number of factors including general capital market conditions, our hedging strategies, policyholder behaviour and mortality experience, each of which may result in negative impacts on net income and capital.
The following table provides information with respect to the guarantees provided for our segregated fund products by business group.
Segregated Fund Risk Exposures
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As at December 31, 2021 |
($ millions) | Fund value | Amount at Risk(1) | Value of guarantees(2) | Insurance contract liabilities(3) |
| Canada | 13,751 | | 183 | | 11,210 | | 350 | |
| Asia | 1,728 | | 166 | | 1,711 | | 69 | |
Corporate(4) | 2,672 | | 137 | | 892 | | 184 | |
| Total | 18,151 | | 486 | | 13,813 | | 603 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As at December 31, 2020 |
($ millions) | Fund value | Amount at Risk(1) | Value of guarantees(2) | Insurance contract liabilities(3) |
| Canada | 12,533 | | 410 | | 10,954 | | 787 | |
| Asia | 2,003 | | 180 | | 1,975 | | 97 | |
Corporate(4) | 2,548 | | 167 | | 964 | | 221 | |
| Total | 17,084 | | 757 | | 13,893 | | 1,105 | |
(1)The Amount at Risk represents the excess of the value of the guarantees over fund values on all policies where the value of the guarantees exceeds the fund value. The Amount at Risk is not currently payable as the guarantees are only payable upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization if fund values remain below guaranteed values.
(2)For guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits, the value of guarantees is calculated as the present value of the maximum future withdrawals assuming market conditions remain unchanged from current levels. For all other benefits, the value of guarantees is determined assuming 100% of the claims are made at the valuation date.
(3)The insurance contract liabilities represent management's provision for future costs associated with these guarantees and include a provision for adverse deviation in accordance with Canadian actuarial standards of practice.
(4)Corporate includes Run-off reinsurance, a closed block of reinsurance. The Run-off reinsurance business includes risks assumed through reinsurance of variable annuity products issued by various North American insurance companies between 1997 and 2001.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 63
The movement of the items in the table above from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021 primarily resulted from the following factors:
(i) the total fund values increased due to an increase in equity markets, which was partially offset by higher interest rates and net redemptions from products closed to new business;
(ii) the total amount at risk decreased due to increases in equity markets and interest rates;
(iii) the total value of guarantees decreased due to net redemptions from products closed to new business; and
(iv) the total insurance contract liabilities decreased due to increases in interest rates and equity markets.
Segregated Fund Hedging
Our hedging programs use derivative instruments to mitigate the interest and equity related exposure of our segregated fund contracts. As at December 31, 2021, over 90% of our segregated fund contracts, as measured by associated fund values, were included in a hedging program. While a large percentage of contracts are included in the hedging program, not all of our market risk exposure related to these contracts is hedged. For those segregated fund contracts included in the hedging program, we generally hedge the value of expected future net claims costs and associated margins.
The following table illustrates the impact of our hedging program related to our sensitivity to a 50 basis point decrease in interest rates and a 10% and 25% decrease in equity markets for segregated fund contracts as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
It is important to note that these estimates are illustrative and performance of our segregated fund dynamic hedging program may differ as actual equity-related exposures vary from broad market indices (the impact of active management, basis risk, and other factors) and higher or lower volatility level than assumed.
Impact of Segregated Fund Hedging
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 | | | |
| ($ millions) | Changes in interest rates(3) | Changes in equity markets(4) |
Net income sensitivity(1)(2) | 50 basis point decrease | 10% decrease | 25% decrease |
| Before hedging | (150) | | (150) | | (350) | |
| Hedging impact | 150 | | 100 | | 250 | |
| Net of hedging | — | | (50) | | (100) | |
| | | |
| December 31, 2020 | | | |
| ($ millions) | Changes in interest rates(3) | Changes in equity markets(4) |
Net income sensitivity(1)(2) | 50 basis point decrease | 10% decrease | 25% decrease |
| Before hedging | (200) | | (150) | | (450) | |
| Hedging impact | 200 | | 100 | | 350 | |
| Net of hedging | — | | (50) | | (100) | |
(1)Net income sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $50 million.
(2)Since the fair value of benefits being hedged will generally differ from the financial statement value (due to different valuation methods and the inclusion of valuation margins in respect of financial statement values), this will result in residual volatility to interest rate and equity market shocks in net income and capital. The general availability and cost of these hedging instruments may be adversely impacted by a number of factors, including volatile and declining equity and interest rate market conditions.
(3)Represents a parallel shift in assumed interest rates across the entire yield curve as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, with no change to the ASB promulgated URR. Variations in realized yields based on factors such as different terms to maturity and geographies may result in realized sensitivities being significantly different from those illustrated above. Sensitivities include the impact of re-balancing interest rate hedges for dynamic hedging programs at 10 basis point intervals (for 50 basis point changes in interest rates).
(4)Represents the change across all equity markets as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Assumes that actual equity exposures consistently and precisely track the broader equity markets. Since in actual practice equity-related exposures generally differ from broad market indices (due to the impact of active management, basis risk, and other factors), realized sensitivities may differ significantly from those illustrated above. Sensitivities include the impact of re-balancing equity hedges for dynamic hedging programs at 2% intervals (for 10% changes in equity markets) and at 5% intervals (for 25% changes in equity markets).
Our hedging strategy is applied both at the line of business or product level and at the Company level using a combination of dynamic hedging techniques (i.e., frequent re-balancing of short-dated interest rate and equity derivative contracts) and longer-dated put options. We actively monitor our overall market exposure and may implement tactical hedge overlay strategies in order to align expected earnings sensitivities with risk management objectives.
64 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Real Estate Risk
Real estate risk is the potential for financial loss arising from fluctuations in the value of, or future cash flows from, our investments in real estate. We are exposed to real estate risk and may experience financial losses resulting from the direct ownership of real estate investments or indirectly through fixed income investments secured by real estate property, leasehold interests, ground rents, and purchase and leaseback transactions. Real estate price risk may arise from external market conditions, inadequate property analysis, inadequate insurance coverage, inappropriate real estate appraisals, or from environmental risk exposures. We hold direct real estate investments that support general account liabilities and surplus, and fluctuations in value will impact our profitability and financial position. A material and sustained increase in interest rates may lead to deterioration in real estate values. An instantaneous 10% decrease in the value of our direct real estate investments as at December 31, 2021 would decrease net income(1) by approximately $375 million ($275 million decrease as at December 31, 2020). Conversely, an instantaneous 10% increase in the value of our direct real estate investments as at December 31, 2021 would increase net income by approximately $350 million ($250 million increase as at December 31, 2020).
| | |
Foreign Currency Risk Foreign currency risk is the result of mismatches in the currency of our assets and liabilities (inclusive of capital), and cash flows. This risk may arise from a variety of sources such as foreign currency transactions and services, foreign currency hedging, investments denominated in foreign currencies, investments in foreign subsidiaries and net income from foreign operations. Changes or volatility in foreign exchange rates, including a change to currencies that are fixed in value to another currency, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
As an international provider of financial services, we operate in a number of countries, with revenues and expenses denominated in several local currencies. In each country in which we operate, we generally maintain the currency profile of assets to match the currency of aggregate liabilities and required surplus. This approach provides an operational hedge against disruptions in local operations caused by currency fluctuations. Foreign currency derivative contracts such as currency swaps and forwards are used as a risk management tool to manage the currency exposure in accordance with our Asset Liability Management Policy. As at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company did not have a material foreign currency risk exposure on a functional currency basis.
Changes in exchange rates can affect our net income and surplus when financial results in functional currencies are translated into Canadian dollars. Net income earned outside of Canada is generally not currency hedged and a weakening in the local currency of our foreign operations relative to the Canadian dollar can have a negative impact on our net income reported in Canadian currency. A strengthening in the local currency of our foreign operations relative to the Canadian dollar would have the opposite effect. Regulatory capital ratios could also be impacted by changes in exchange rates. |
| | |
Additional Cautionary Language and Key Assumptions Related to Sensitivities The market risk sensitivities are measures of estimated changes in net income and OCI for changes in interest rates and equity market price levels described above, based on interest rates, equity market prices and business mix in place as at the respective calculation dates. These sensitivities are calculated independently for each risk factor, generally assuming that all other risk variables stay constant. The sensitivities do not take into account indirect effects such as potential impacts on goodwill impairment or valuation allowances on deferred tax assets. The sensitivities are provided for the consolidated entity and may not be proportional across all reporting segments. Actual results can differ materially from these estimates for a variety of reasons, including differences in the pattern or distribution of the market shocks, the interaction between these risk factors, model error, or changes in other assumptions such as business mix, effective tax rates, policyholder behaviour, currency exchange rates and other market variables relative to those underlying the calculation of these sensitivities. The extent to which actual results may differ from the indicative ranges will generally increase with larger capital market movements. Our sensitivities as at December 31, 2020 have been included for comparative purposes only. |
We have also provided measures of our net income sensitivity to instantaneous changes in credit spreads, swap spreads, real estate price levels, and capital sensitivities to changes in interest rates and equity price levels. The real estate sensitivities are non-IFRS financial measures. For additional information, see section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document. The cautionary language which appears in this section is also applicable to the credit spread, swap spread, real estate, and LICAT ratio sensitivities. In particular, these sensitivities are based on interest rates, credit and swap spreads, equity market, and real estate price levels as at the respective calculation dates and assume that all other risk variables remain constant. Changes in interest rates, credit and swap spreads, equity market, and real estate prices in excess of the ranges illustrated may result in other-than-proportionate impacts.
As these market risk sensitivities reflect an instantaneous impact on net income, OCI and Sun Life Assurance's LICAT ratio, they do not include impacts over time such as the effect on fee income in our asset management businesses.
| | |
The sensitivities reflect the composition of our assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Changes in these positions due to new sales or maturities, asset purchases/sales, or other management actions could result in material changes to these reported sensitivities. In particular, these sensitivities reflect the expected impact of hedging activities based on the hedge programs in place as at the December 31 calculation dates. The actual impact of hedging activity can differ materially from that assumed in the determination of these indicative sensitivities due to ongoing hedge re-balancing activities, changes in the scale or scope of hedging activities, changes in the cost or general availability of hedging instruments, basis risk (i.e., the risk that hedges do not exactly replicate the underlying portfolio experience), model risk, and other operational risks in the ongoing management of the hedge programs or the potential failure of hedge counterparties to perform in accordance with expectations. |
(1)Sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 65
| | |
The sensitivities are based on methods and assumptions in effect as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, as applicable. Changes in the regulatory environment, accounting or actuarial valuation methods, models, or assumptions (including changes to the ASB promulgated URR) after those dates could result in material changes to these reported sensitivities. Changes in interest rates and equity market prices in excess of the ranges illustrated may result in other than proportionate impacts.
Our hedging programs may themselves expose us to other risks, including basis risk, volatility risk, and increased levels of derivative counterparty credit risk, liquidity risk, model risk and other operational risks. These factors may adversely impact the net effectiveness, costs, and financial viability of maintaining these hedging programs and therefore adversely impact our profitability and financial position. While our hedging programs are intended to mitigate these effects, residual risk, potential reported earnings and capital volatility remain. Hedge counterparty credit risk is managed by maintaining broad diversification, dealing primarily with highly-rated counterparties, and transacting through over-the-counter ("OTC") contracts cleared through central clearing houses, exchange-traded contracts or bilateral OTC contracts negotiated directly between counterparties that include credit support annexes.
For the reasons outlined above, our sensitivities should only be viewed as directional estimates of the underlying sensitivities of each factor under these specialized assumptions, and should not be viewed as predictors of our future net income, OCI, and capital. Given the nature of these calculations, we cannot provide assurance that actual impacts will be consistent with the estimates provided. |
Information related to market risk sensitivities and guarantees related to segregated fund products should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the sections in this MD&A under the section M - Accounting and Control Matters - 1 - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in our 2021 annual MD&A. Additional information on market risk can be found in Note 6 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements and the Risk Factors section in the AIF.
ii. Insurance Risk
Risk Description
Insurance risk is the uncertainty of product performance due to actual experience emerging differently than expected in the areas of policyholder behaviour, mortality, morbidity and longevity. In addition, product design and pricing, expense and reinsurance risks impact multiple risk categories, including insurance risk.
Insurance Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of insurance risk management practices and controls, as outlined below:
•Insurance risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Risk Committee.
•Income and regulatory capital sensitivities are monitored, managed and reported against pre-established risk appetite limits for policyholder behaviour, mortality, morbidity and longevity risks.
•Comprehensive Insurance Risk Policy, guidelines and practices are in place.
•The global underwriting manual aligns underwriting practices with our corporate risk management standards and ensures a consistent approach in insurance underwriting.
•Board-approved maximum retention limits are in place. Amounts issued in excess of these limits are reinsured.
•Detailed procedures, including criteria for approval of risks and for claims adjudication are established and monitored for each business segment.
•Underwriting and risk selection standards and procedures are established and overseen by the corporate underwriting and claims risk management function.
•Diversification and risk pooling is managed by aggregation of exposures across product lines, geography and distribution channels.
•We use reinsurance to limit losses, minimize exposure to significant risks and to provide additional capacity for growth.
•The Insurance Risk Policy and Investment & Credit Risk Policy establish acceptance criteria and protocols to monitor the level of reinsurance ceded to any single reinsurer or group of reinsurers.
•Reinsurance counterparty risk is monitored, including annual reporting of reinsurance exposure to the Risk Committee.
•Concentration risk exposure is monitored on group policies in a single location to avoid a catastrophic event occurrence resulting in a significant impact.
•Various limits, restrictions and fee structures are introduced into plan designs in order to establish a more homogeneous policy risk profile and limit potential for anti-selection.
•Regulatory solvency requirements include risk-based capital requirements and are monitored regularly.
•The Product Design and Pricing Policy requires detailed risk assessment and pricing provision for material risks.
•Company specific and industry level experience studies and sources of earnings analysis are monitored and factored into valuation, renewal and new business pricing processes.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse movements in insurance risk factors.
•Insurance contract liabilities are established in accordance with Canadian actuarial standards of practice.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
Our Insurance Risk Policy sets maximum global retention limits and related management standards and practices that are applied to reduce our exposure to large claims. Amounts in excess of the Board-approved maximum retention limits are reinsured. On a single life or joint-first-to-die basis retention limit is $40 million in Canada and US$40 million outside of Canada. For survivorship life insurance, our maximum global retention limit is $50 million in Canada and US$50 million outside of Canada. In certain markets and jurisdictions, retention levels below the maximum are applied. Reinsurance is utilized for numerous products in most business segments, and placement is done on an automatic basis for defined insurance portfolios and on a facultative basis for individual risks with certain characteristics.
66 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Our reinsurance coverage is well diversified and controls are in place to manage exposure to reinsurance counterparties. Reinsurance exposures are monitored to ensure that no single reinsurer represents an undue level of credit risk. This includes performing periodic due diligence on our reinsurance counterparties as well as internal credit assessments on counterparties with which we have material exposure. While reinsurance arrangements provide for the recovery of claims arising from the liabilities ceded, we retain primary responsibility to the policyholders.
Specific insurance risks and our risk management strategies are discussed below in further detail.
Policyholder Behaviour Risk
We can incur losses due to adverse policyholder behaviour relative to the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products with regard to lapse of policies or exercise of other embedded policy options.
Uncertainty in policyholder behaviour can arise from several sources including unexpected events in the policyholder's life circumstances, the general level of economic activity (whether higher or lower than expected), changes in the financial and capital markets, changes in pricing and availability of current products, the introduction of new products, changes in underwriting technology and standards, as well as changes in our financial strength or reputation. Uncertainty in future cash flows affected by policyholder behaviour can be further exacerbated by irrational behaviour during times of economic turbulence or at key option exercise points in the life of an insurance contract.
Various types of provisions are built into many of our products to reduce the impact of uncertain policyholder behaviour. These provisions include:
•Surrender charges that adjust the payout to the policyholder by taking into account prevailing market conditions.
•Limits on the amount that policyholders can surrender or borrow.
•Restrictions on the timing of policyholders' ability to exercise certain options.
•Restrictions on both the types of funds Clients can select and the frequency with which they can change funds.
•Policyholder behaviour risk is also mitigated through reinsurance on some insurance contracts.
Internal experience studies are used to monitor, review and update policyholder behaviour assumptions as needed which could result in updates to policy liabilities.
Mortality and Morbidity Risk
Mortality and morbidity risk is the risk that future experience could be worse than the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products. Mortality and morbidity risk can arise in the normal course of business through random fluctuation in realized experience, through catastrophes, as a result of a pandemic, or in association with other risk factors such as product development and pricing or model risk. Adverse mortality and morbidity experience could also occur through systemic anti-selection, which could arise due to poor plan design, or underwriting process failure or the development of investor-owned and secondary markets for life insurance policies.
External factors could adversely affect our life insurance, health insurance, critical illness, disability, long-term care insurance and annuity businesses. Morbidity experience could be unfavourably impacted by external events, such as pandemics, increases in disability claims during economic slowdowns and increases in high medical treatment costs and growth in utilization of specialty drugs. This introduces the potential for adverse financial volatility in our financial results.
Detailed uniform underwriting procedures have been established to determine the insurability of applicants and to manage exposure to large claims. These underwriting requirements are regularly scrutinized against industry guidelines and oversight is provided through a corporate underwriting and claim management function.
Mortality and morbidity concentration risk is the risk of a catastrophic event, such as natural environmental disasters (for example, earthquakes), human-made disasters (for example, acts of terrorism, military actions, and inadvertent introduction of toxic elements into the environment) as well as epidemics that could occur in geographic locations where there is significant insurance coverage. We do not have a high degree of concentration risk to single individuals or groups due to our well-diversified geographic and business mix. The largest portion of mortality risk within the Company is in North America. Individual and group insurance policies are underwritten prior to initial issue and renewals, based on risk selection, plan design, and rating techniques.
The Insurance Risk Policy approved by the Risk Committee includes limits on the maximum amount of insurance that may be issued under one policy and the maximum amount that may be retained. These limits vary by geographic region and amounts in excess of limits are reinsured to ensure there is no exposure to unreasonable concentration of risk.
Longevity Risk
Longevity risk is the potential for economic loss, accounting loss or volatility in earnings arising from adverse changes in rates of mortality improvement relative to the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products. This risk can manifest itself slowly over time as socioeconomic conditions improve and medical advances continue. It could also manifest itself more quickly, for example, due to medical breakthroughs that significantly extend life expectancy. Longevity risk affects contracts where benefits or costs are based upon the likelihood of survival and higher than expected improvements in policyholder life expectancy could therefore increase the ultimate cost of these benefits (for example, annuities, pensions, pure endowments, reinsurance, segregated funds, and specific types of health contracts). Additionally, our longevity risk exposure is increased for certain annuity products such as guaranteed annuity options by an increase in equity market levels.
To improve management of longevity risk, we monitor research in the fields that could result in a change in expected mortality improvement. Stress-testing techniques are used to measure and monitor the impact of extreme mortality improvement on the aggregate portfolio of insurance and annuity products as well as our own pension plans.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 67
Product Design and Pricing Risk
Product design and pricing risk is the risk a product does not perform as expected, causing adverse financial consequences. This risk may arise from deviations in realized experience versus assumptions used in the pricing of products. Risk factors include uncertainty concerning future investment yields, policyholder behaviour, mortality and morbidity experience, sales levels, mix of business, expenses and taxes. Although some of our products permit us to increase premiums or adjust other charges and credits during the life of the policy or contract, the terms of these policies or contracts may not allow for sufficient adjustments to maintain expected profitability. This could have an adverse effect on our profitability and capital position.
Our Product Design and Pricing Policy, approved by the Risk Committee, establishes the framework governing our product design and pricing practices and is designed to align our product offerings with our strategic objectives and risk-taking philosophy. Consistent with this policy, product development, design and pricing processes have been implemented throughout the Company. New products follow a stage-gate process with defined management approvals based on the significance of the initiative. Each initiative is subject to a risk assessment process to identify key risks and risk mitigation requirements, and is reviewed by multiple stakeholders. Additional governance and control procedures are listed below:
•Pricing models, methods, and assumptions are subject to periodic internal peer reviews.
•Experience studies, sources of earnings analysis, and product dashboards are used to monitor actual experience against those assumed in pricing and valuation.
•On experience rated, participating, and adjustable products, emerging experience is reflected through changes in policyholder dividend scales as well as other policy adjustment mechanisms such as premium and benefit levels.
•Limits and restrictions may be introduced into the design of products to mitigate adverse policyholder behaviour or apply upper thresholds on certain benefits.
Expense Risk
Expense risk is the risk that future expenses are higher than the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products. This risk can arise from general economic conditions, unexpected increases in inflation, slower than anticipated growth, or reduction in productivity leading to increases in unit expenses. Expense risk occurs in products where we cannot or will not pass increased costs onto the Client and will manifest itself in the form of a liability increase or a reduction in expected future profits.
We closely monitor expenses through an annual budgeting process and ongoing monitoring of any expense gaps between unit expenses assumed in pricing and actual expenses.
Reinsurance Risk
We purchase reinsurance for certain risks underwritten by our various insurance businesses. Reinsurance risk is the risk of financial loss due to adverse developments in reinsurance markets (for example, discontinuance or diminution of reinsurance capacity, or an increase in the cost of reinsurance), insolvency of a reinsurer or inadequate reinsurance coverage.
Changes in reinsurance market conditions, including actions taken by reinsurers to increase rates on existing and new coverage and our ability to obtain appropriate reinsurance, may adversely impact the availability or cost of maintaining existing or securing new reinsurance capacity, with adverse impacts on our business strategies, profitability and financial position. There is a possibility of rate increases or renegotiation of some of the legacy reinsurance contracts by a few of our reinsurers, as they continue to review and optimize their business models. In addition, changes to the regulatory treatment of reinsurance arrangements could have an adverse impact on our capital position.
We have an Insurance Risk Policy and an Investment & Credit Risk Policy approved by the Risk Committee, which set acceptance criteria and processes to monitor the level of reinsurance ceded to any single reinsurer. These policies also set minimum criteria for determining which reinsurance companies qualify as suitable reinsurance counterparties having the capability, expertise, governance practices and financial capacity to assume the risks being considered. Additionally, these policies require that all agreements include provisions to allow action to be taken, such as recapture of ceded risk (at a potential cost to the Company), in the event that the reinsurer loses its legal ability to carry on business through insolvency or regulatory action. Periodic due diligence is performed on the reinsurance counterparties with which we do business and internal credit assessments are performed on reinsurance counterparties with which we have material exposure. Reinsurance counterparty credit exposures are monitored closely and reported annually to the Risk Committee.
New sales of our products can be discontinued or changed to reflect developments in the reinsurance markets. Rates for our in-force reinsurance treaties can be either guaranteed or adjustable for the life of the ceded policy. In order to diversify reinsurance risk, there is generally more than one reinsurer supporting a reinsurance pool.
Additional information on insurance risk can be found in Note 7 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements and in the Risk Factors section in the AIF.
iii. Credit Risk
Risk Description
Credit risk is the possibility of loss from amounts owed by our borrowers or financial counterparties. We are subject to credit risk in connection with issuers of securities held in our investment portfolio, debtors, structured securities, reinsurers, counterparties (including derivative, repurchase agreement and securities lending counterparties), other financial institutions and other entities. Losses may occur when a counterparty fails to make timely payments pursuant to the terms of the underlying contractual arrangement or when the counterparty's credit rating or risk profile otherwise deteriorates. Credit risk can also arise in connection with deterioration in the value of, or ability to realize, any underlying security that may be used as collateral for the debt obligation. Credit risk can occur as a result of broad economic conditions, challenges within specific sectors of the economy, or from issues affecting individual companies. Events that result in defaults, impairments or downgrades of the securities in our
68 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
investment portfolio would cause the Company to record realized or unrealized losses and may cause an increase in our provisions for asset default, adversely impacting earnings.
Credit Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of credit risk management practices and controls, as outlined below:
•Credit risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Risk Committee.
•Risk appetite limits have been established for credit risk.
•Income and regulatory capital sensitivities are monitored, managed and reported against pre-established risk limits.
•Comprehensive Investment and Credit Risk Management Policy, guidelines and practices are in place.
•Specific investment diversification requirements are in place, such as defined investment limits for asset class, geography, and industry.
•Risk-based credit portfolio, counterparty, and sector exposure limits have been established.
•Mandatory use of credit quality ratings for portfolio investments has been established and is reviewed regularly. These internal rating decisions for new fixed income investments and ongoing review of existing rating decisions are independently adjudicated by Corporate Risk Management.
•Comprehensive due diligence processes and ongoing credit analyses are conducted.
•Regulatory solvency requirements include risk-based capital requirements and are monitored regularly.
•Comprehensive compliance monitoring practices and procedures including reporting against pre-established investment limits are in place.
•Reinsurance exposures are monitored to ensure that no single reinsurer represents an undue level of credit risk.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse credit developments.
•Insurance contract liabilities are established in accordance with Canadian actuarial standards of practice.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
Our core principles of credit risk management include asset diversification, fundamental research and analysis of cash flows, proactive and continuous risk monitoring, active management and relative value assessment, all with the objective of optimizing risk-adjusted returns, with due consideration for the impacts of capital and taxation.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We rate fixed income investments primarily through the use of internally developed scorecards which combine an estimated probability of default and loss given default to determine an expected loss and credit risk rating. This rating is expressed using a 22-point scale that is generally consistent with those used by external rating agencies, and is based on detailed examination of the borrower's, or issuer's, credit quality and the characteristics of the specific instrument. The probability of default assessment is based on borrower-level or issuer-level analysis, which encompasses an assessment of industry risk, business strategy, competitiveness, strength of management and other financial information. The loss given default assessment is based on instrument-level analysis, which considers the impact of guarantees, covenants, liquidity and other structural features. These scorecards provide input to stochastic value-at-risk models and are used to stress test the portfolio, which provide insight into the distribution and characteristics of credit risk within our portfolios. In accordance with our policies and under normal circumstances, our ratings cannot be higher than the highest rating provided by certain Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations ("NRSROs"). Certain assets, including those in our sovereign debt and asset-backed securities portfolios, are assigned a rating based on ratings provided by NRSROs using a priority sequence order of Standard & Poor's, Moody's, Fitch and DBRS Limited. |
Additional information on credit risk can be found in Note 6 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements and in the Risk Factors section in the AIF.
iv. Business and Strategic Risk
Risk Description
Business and strategic risk is the risk of loss from the inability to adequately identify, plan or implement an appropriate business strategy to achieve strategic and business objectives or adapt to changes in Client behaviours or the external business, economic, political, regulatory or environmental and social landscape.
Business and Strategic Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of business and strategic risk management practices and controls, as outlined below:
•Business and strategic risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring, review and reporting to senior management, the Board and the Board Committees.
•Business and strategic risk is managed through our strategic and business planning process and controls over the implementation of these plans. These plans are reviewed and discussed at the executive level and the key themes, issues and risks emerging are discussed by the Board and the Board Committees.
•Our business and strategic plans are subject to approval by the Board, which also receives regular reviews of implementation progress against key business plan objectives.
•Comprehensive policies including the Risk Management Framework, Risk Appetite Policy, Product Design and Pricing Policy, Mergers and Acquisition Policy, Capital and Liquidity Management Framework and Capital Risk Policy are in place.
•Our corporate strategy and business objectives are established within the boundaries of the Risk Appetite Policy. Our business strategies and plans are designed to align with our risk appetite, our capital position and our financial performance objectives.
•Our risk appetite is periodically assessed, taking into consideration the economic and regulatory environments in which we operate.
•Merger, acquisition, strategic investments and divestiture transactions are governed by a Board-approved Merger and Acquisition Risk Management Policy and significant transactions require the approval of the Board.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse scenarios.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 69
•Key and emerging risks are identified, monitored and reported, including emerging regulatory changes that may have a material impact on our finances, operations or reputation.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
We regularly review and adapt our business strategies and plans to take account of changes in the external business, economic, political and regulatory environments in which we operate. Our business strategies and plans are designed to align with our risk appetite, our capital position and our financial performance objectives. We periodically reassess our risk appetite taking into consideration the economic, regulatory and competitive environment in which we operate.
Specific business and strategic risks are discussed below in further detail.
Economic and Political Risk
We operate in various geographies and our business and financial operations are susceptible to regional and global economic, political and regulatory changes. We may be affected by economic and capital markets conditions and economic shocks around the globe as a result of increasingly connected global markets. Factors such as changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, market volatility, housing prices, consumer spending, saving and debt, business investment and inflation around the globe can affect the business and economic environments in which we operate. Continued economic and political uncertainty may give rise to increased business and strategic risks including those associated with industry restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, changing competitive dynamics and changes in the legal, regulatory and tax regimes in which our businesses operate. In addition, adverse economic conditions often arise in conjunction with volatile and deteriorating capital markets conditions, which can have an adverse impact on Client behaviour and in turn on our sales and profitability, credit and financial strength ratings, and capital and liquidity positions.
Strategic Execution Risk
Our business strategies and plans are dependent on the successful execution of organizational and strategic initiatives designed to support the growth of our business. Our ability to manage the execution of these initiatives effectively and prioritize initiatives directly affects our ability to execute our strategies. Identifying and implementing the right set of initiatives is critical to achieving our business plan targets. Failure to identify and implement the right set of initiatives could also lead to cost structure challenges and inability to achieve our growth objectives.
Distribution Risk
Failure to achieve planned distribution scale could materially impact our financial and strategic objectives. This includes the inability to attract and retain intermediaries and agents at a cost that is financially feasible to the Company, or to develop digital sales and Client support capabilities and technologies. Distribution risk may also be influenced where our distribution or product strategy and related services (including digital sales and Client support capabilities and technologies) are not developed, modified or executed in line with our strategic objectives or in consideration of the changes in Client behaviour or our regulatory environment. In addition, the lack of a well-diversified distribution model in the jurisdictions in which we do business may cause over-reliance on agency channel or key partners.
Risks Relating to Mergers, Acquisitions, Divestitures and Strategic Investments
We regularly explore opportunities to selectively acquire other businesses or to divest ourselves of all or part of certain businesses, in support of our growth and strategic objectives. Any transaction that we enter into introduces a number of risks associated with economic, operational, strategic, financial, tax, legal, regulatory, compliance, and other factors.
There is a risk that we may be unable to make an appropriate acquisition in a desired market or business line or are unable to realize the financial and strategic benefits of the transactions due to competitive factors, regulatory requirements or other factors. There is a risk that the capital utilized to finance any transaction could limit our ability to deploy further capital to pursue other opportunities and initiatives. These risks could adversely impact our ability to achieve our financial and strategic objectives.
Our ability to realize the contemplated economic, financial, and strategic benefit of any transaction that we enter into is contingent on the effective separation and integration of the transferred businesses, restructuring or reorganization of related businesses, and motivating and retaining personnel to effectively execute these transactions. In addition, the integration of operations and differences in organizational culture may require the dedication of significant management resources, which may distract management’s attention from our day-to-day business. Anticipated cost synergies or other expected benefits may not materialize due to a failure to successfully integrate the acquired businesses with our existing operations. Any of these risks, if realized, could prevent us from achieving the expected results from a transaction or could impact our financial and strategic objectives.
To mitigate these risks, we have established procedures to govern the evaluation, execution and integration of merger and acquisition transactions. Regular updates on execution and integration risks relating to these transactions are provided to the Board, Board Committees and senior management committees, as appropriate, along with any mitigants developed to address such risks.
Competitive Environment
Competition from insurance companies, banks, asset managers, mutual fund companies, financial planners and other service providers (including new entrants and non-traditional financial services companies) is intense, and could adversely affect our business in certain countries.
The businesses in which we engage are highly competitive and our ability to sell our products is dependent on many factors, including scale, price and yields offered, distribution channels, digital capabilities, financial strength ratings, range of product lines and product and service quality, brand strength, investment performance, historical dividend levels and the ability to provide value added services to distributors and Clients. In certain markets, some of our competitors may be superior to us on one or more of these factors. Our competitors have significant potential to disrupt our
70 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
business through targeted strategies to reduce our market share which may include targeting our key people or bancassurance partners and other distributors or aggressively pricing their products. Our ability to achieve our business plans and strategies depends significantly upon our capacity to anticipate and respond quickly to these competitive pressures.
Technology is driving rapid change in the financial services sector and is enabling new entrants to compete or offer services to our competitors to enhance their ability to compete in certain segments of the insurance, wealth and asset management markets. The emergence of new technologies such as robotic process automation, artificial intelligence, blockchain and advanced analytics may have an impact on the financial services sector and how companies interact with their stakeholders. Our current competitors or new entrants may use these or other new technologies to provide services in various areas such as customized pricing, proactive outreach to Clients and targeted marketing in order to strengthen their Client relationships and influence Client behaviour. The impact of disruption from changing technology and innovation by traditional and non-traditional competitors who may offer a better user experience, functionality or lower priced products and may have lower distribution costs will require us to adapt at a more rapid pace and may create margin pressures. The risk of disruption may also impact our distribution models as new and low cost digital-based business models emerge in connection with the distribution of financial services and products, such as insurtechs and robo-advisors. These risks are evolving rapidly with an increasing number of digital users and are difficult to anticipate and respond to proactively, and may adversely impact our profitability and financial position.
Investment Performance
Investment performance risk is the possibility that we fail to achieve the desired return objectives on our investment portfolio, or that our asset management businesses fail to design or execute investment strategies in order to achieve competitive returns on the products and managed accounts offered by these businesses. Failure to achieve investment objectives may adversely affect our revenue and profitability through slower growth prospects and adverse impacts on policyholder or Client behaviour.
Changes in Legal and Regulatory Environment
Most of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation and supervision. Changes to legislation, regulations or government policies, or the manner in which they are interpreted or enforced, may require that we make significant changes to our strategy, may result in increased implementation costs and diversion of resources to manage the change. These changes could impact financial reporting, accounting processes, capital requirements, the regulatory framework for our products and services, the regulation of selling practices, sales intermediaries (such as bancassurance) and product offerings (such as coverage for prescription drugs), solvency requirements, executive compensation, and corporate governance practices and could impose restrictions on our foreign operations (such as limits on foreign ownership of local companies). All of these changes could have an adverse effect on our business and operations. Our failure to comply with existing and evolving regulatory requirements could also result in regulatory sanctions and could affect our relationships with regulatory authorities and our ability to execute our business strategies and plans.
Environmental and Social Risk
Our financial performance, operations, and reputation may be adversely affected if we do not adequately prepare for the direct or indirect negative impacts of environmental and social risks. Environmental and social risk include but are not limited to environmental damage on properties owned or managed by us and climate change related physical and transition risks, public health issues and issues of inequality.
Business units in our Asset Management pillar integrate environmental (as well as social and governance - ESG) considerations in their investment decision-making for Sun Life assets and Client assets. Existing and potential ESG risks are incorporated into initial and ongoing reviews and assessments of public equities and fixed income, private fixed income, real estate, infrastructure and commercial mortgage investments. In addition, we monitor our third party managers in the asset management, general account and fund platform businesses through our International Investment Centre. This centre functions as an investment research and consulting group. In the due diligence and monitoring of third-party managers, it assesses each manager’s incorporation of ESG into its investment processes, as well as other relevant sustainability factors, and monitors them on an ongoing basis.
We engage in and monitor environmental, social and broader sustainability developments in part through our participation as a signatory to the United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment ("PRI"), United Nations Environment Programme - Finance Initiative ("UNEPFI"), Climate Action 100+, Climate Engagement Canada and CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project). Our Chief Sustainability Officer leads enterprise-wide efforts to embed sustainable practices across our businesses and help drive further actions that create a cleaner, more inclusive, and sustainable future, in line with our enterprise strategy and our Purpose. Our International Sustainability Council, composed of senior executives from each of our businesses, key functions and regions convenes on broad sustainability issues. Members are responsible for implementation of our sustainability plan, through the areas of focus that align with their business. They champion, influence and drive action. We report on sustainability performance, including reporting related to climate change, the environment and social issues, in our annual Sustainability Report, available at sunlife.com/sustainability.
Climate Change
Climate change is one of the defining issues of our time. The scientific community has demonstrated that the world is warming. Governments, regulators, investors, clients and other stakeholders are increasing efforts to tackle this global issue. The UN Secretary-General referred to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ("IPCC") Working Group 1 report released in 2021 as “code red for humanity”. We believe that it is incumbent upon us to respond and to take actions that support the goal of the Paris Agreement to limit the global temperature increase in this century to well below 2 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Climate change presents risks of varying timelines to our business, with complex and broad potential impacts. As the commitments we make to our Clients may extend decades into the future, the risks related to climate change impacts exist within the solutions we are providing to our Clients today. Our Purpose of helping our Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives cannot be achieved without a sound approach to climate change that supports the transition to a lower-carbon future. Our Purpose can best be realized through the integration of this thinking
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 71
across our businesses, and through working collaboratively with other stakeholders towards a common goal of avoiding the worst effects of climate change. We have set a goal to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions by 2050. (Refer to Metrics and Targets for additional details.)
Our climate strategy includes the following elements:
•We recognize that as a long-term investor, we have the opportunity to be part of the solution to this global challenge and invest proactively in assets and businesses that support a transition to a lower-carbon economy.
•We assess climate-related impacts on our businesses and investments with the aim of prudently managing them to realize our commitments, while acknowledging the challenges of uncertainty and imperfect data to inform such decisions.
•We are committed to advocacy and collaboration with governments, regulators, investors, and industry leaders to develop supportive net-zero programs and policies that pave a path towards decarbonization.
•We advocate for better data and disclosures, so we can make better-informed assessments of climate-related risks. We support the actions of regulators to require reporting aligned to the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures ("TCFD"), and welcome ongoing efforts to improve disclosure standards.
•We commit to continuously improving our climate-related measurement, monitoring and reporting.
•We are focused on reducing climate impact and strengthening the resilience of our own operations around the world, as well as the properties that we own in our investment portfolio.
We commit to working together across industries, with our Clients, investees and other stakeholders to contribute to solving this global challenge. We recognize that we do not yet have the answers to this complex topic.
Our strategy will evolve over time, building on our experience and external developments.
TCFD Disclosures
We support the recommendations of the TCFD. The following sets out our climate-related disclosures in line with these recommendations, which are structured around four themes that represent core elements of how organizations operate: strategy, governance, risk management, and metrics and targets.
A dedicated senior executive steering committee guides our implementation of TCFD recommendations. Refer to Governance, below, for further details.
Strategy
Climate change is an important issue with potential implications for us as an asset management and insurance company. Similar to our previous experience with Financial Condition Testing ("FCT"), external research indicates climate change risks are not expected to have a material impact on the liability side of life insurance portfolios over the shorter-term and that the greater risk in the shorter-term is expected to be to the asset side of life insurance portfolios(1).
With respect to investments, our approach for climate change encompasses both a risk and opportunity viewpoint.
A transition to a lower carbon economy could affect asset values. Portfolio investments in coal, conventional oil and oil sands producers, utilities and related fossil fuel industries, railways and pipelines, as well as markets that depend on these industries, may be subject to additional financial risk as a result of changes in regulation, cost of capital, consumer preferences and competition from renewable energy companies leading to lower overall profitability and/or stranded assets (assets for which the investment costs cannot be recovered as intended).
Physical climate impacts could affect investments in real assets such as real estate, commercial mortgages, and infrastructure, as well as our own operations, and operations and revenues of our Clients and businesses across our portfolios. Risks may result from increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events and from longer-term shifts in climate patterns.
For further discussion of potential climate-related risks, please refer to Environmental and Social Risk in our 2021 AIF under Risk Factors – Business and Strategic Risk.
Climate-related opportunities include those related to sustainability and green bonds, and investments in developing resilient and adaptive real estate and infrastructure as well as renewable energy and other assets and businesses that support a transition to a low-carbon economy. Many companies and industries are benefiting from climate change-related tailwinds, such as mobility (vehicle electrification), energy efficiency services, battery technology and renewables. Through our ESG integration efforts, we seek to identify these investment opportunities in both public and private markets in both direct (real estate, infrastructure) and securitized investments. We were the first life insurer globally to issue a sustainability bond. Sustainability bonds can play a role in supporting the transition to a lower-carbon economy. Through our Asset Management pillar, we are well-positioned to invest in this transition. Asset management is delivered by SLC Management, InfraRed, BGO and Crescent, all of which operate under the SLC Management brand, as well as by MFS. Climate-related investing strategies for our asset management businesses are highlighted below.
•SLC Management invests in sustainable infrastructure around the world through its platform of public and private fixed income investments. Sustainable infrastructure categories include renewable energy, energy efficiency, and clean transportation.
•InfraRed invests in and manages social infrastructure and energy efficiency, low-carbon generation, and renewable energy projects, which advances our sustainable investment options for institutional Clients while complementing our focus on sustainable investing and climate change.
(1)The Geneva Association. 2021. Climate Change Risk Assessment for the Insurance Industry. February. Authors: Maryam Golnaraghi and the Geneva Association Task Force on Climate Change Risk Assessment for the Insurance Industry
72 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
•BGO proactively addresses climate risks at the property and portfolio levels through strategic planning that assesses and mitigates critical vulnerabilities and builds adaptive capacity. BGO utilizes its award-winning proprietary resilience tool that combines industry research with predictive climate modelling to deliver tailor-made climate resilience adaptation plans across our portfolios. These efforts help BGO to drive for long-term returns for Clients and investors.
•Crescent’s investment decisions are guided by Clients’ long-term interests, which are served through the incorporation of ESG considerations, including those related to climate change. Where possible, Crescent seeks to engage collaboratively with portfolio companies on topics such as carbon emissions measurement and reporting and energy efficiency.
•As long-term investors in public issuers, MFS assesses climate change as a key investment decision factor at both the issuer level and portfolio level. MFS also regularly engages with companies to encourage better disclosure and management of climate-related risks and opportunities. In 2021, MFS published its Climate Manifesto which outlines its beliefs and purpose as an investor with regard to the risks and opportunities associated with climate change and the goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.
As longer-term investors, we believe that integrating climate change as a key element of investment decision-making can be a source of competitive advantage for two reasons: we believe it should lead to stronger risk-adjusted returns for Clients over time, and stronger ESG investment ratings from groups like the PRI, Morningstar, GRESB (formerly Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark) and others are increasingly key decision factors for Clients. As participants in Climate Engagement Canada and Climate Action 100+ investor initiatives, we engage some of the world’s largest corporate GHG emitters with whom we have investments, to ensure their climate related goals and objectives align with those of the Company and our Clients.
The same principles are used in the selection and monitoring of third-party investment managers that we engage to invest assets on behalf of our Clients in group retirement savings plans. We recognize that our Clients are increasingly bringing a sustainable investment lens to our solutions. Our proprietary ESG integration evaluation framework helps sponsors of Sun Life Canada group retirement plans make informed decisions about the investment options they make available to their employees in their workplace plans. The evaluation framework uses detailed criteria in three key areas: Firm Policies, Investment Process and Active Ownership.
Our previous work with climate change scenarios, as part of our FCT, provided insight into the impact of climate-related risks. In 2021, we participated in a climate scenario analysis pilot project between the Bank of Canada, OSFI, and a small group of Canadian financial institutions. The scenarios that were developed focused on transition risks. They were designed to capture a range of potential outcomes and illustrate the kinds of stresses on the financial system and economy that could occur as the world transitions to a lower-carbon future. Scenarios were not intended to be forecasts or predictions. The findings of the pilot are broadly consistent with our past understanding of sectors that are most likely to be affected by potential climate change transition impacts and the implications of delaying policy action. While the pilot analyzed a sample of general account assets managed by SLC Management, other asset management affiliate companies also have been progressing their work on climate scenario analysis.
The pilot experience was valuable in deepening our understanding of potential carbon transition impacts, helping develop needed skill-sets, and better understanding the degree of resources and technical expertise required for this type of analysis. Participation in the pilot highlighted the important role industry initiatives can play in accelerating the timelines by which these capabilities can be developed in comparison to individual institutions working in isolation.
We support The Bank of Canada and OSFI’s commitment to better understanding and assessing climate-related risks to the Canadian economy and financial system and to supporting financial institutions in building their capacity for climate-related risk assessment and management.
Governance
Three Board Committees have oversight over aspects of climate change.
•The GICRC provides oversight of our enterprise-wide Sustainability Policy and sustainability program, including reviewing and recommending approval of the annual Sustainability Report and Sustainability Plan to the Board. The GICRC monitors progress on sustainability plan implementation, goals and targets, including greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions performance.
•The Risk Committee provides enterprise-wide oversight of the management of current and emerging risks, including of climate-related risks and, broadly, environmental risks. For more detail on the Risk Committee’s role, refer to Risk Management in this section.
•The Audit Committee has oversight of all financial disclosures in the financial statements and MD&A, including those related to climate change.
The Board has ultimate oversight of climate change issues, and uses reports from the Board Committee Chairs noted above, and other direct presentations by management and external experts, to decide on the nature and extent of its input and to provide challenge, advice and guidance to senior management on the enterprise approach to climate change.
At the management level, the Chief Sustainability Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Risk Officer, and Chief Investment Officer play key roles in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities.
•Our Chief Sustainability Officer has overall accountability for sustainability, including climate change, across the enterprise. This accountability includes setting strategy and the governance framework for our organization. Climate Change is part of the Trusted and Responsible Business foundation of our sustainability plan (available at sunlife.com/sustainability). As stated above, the Chief Sustainability Officer chairs our International Sustainability Council.
•Our Chief Legal Officer served as executive sponsor of sustainability prior to the appointment of the Chief Sustainability Officer, and through 2021 has chaired our senior executive TCFD steering committee with representation from Enterprise Risk Management, Finance, Asset Management, and Sustainability.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 73
•Our Chief Risk Officer is responsible for leading the Risk Management function (as noted above in Risk Management sections 2 and 7). Key and emerging risks are monitored and reported to the Risk Committee of the Board.
•The Chief Investment Officer chairs the Sustainability Committee and Sustainable Investment Council within SLC Management. The Sustainability Committee is responsible for setting strategic direction related to sustainability and ESG matters and sets priorities on key sustainability initiatives across SLC Management. The Sustainable Investment Council oversees the integration of material ESG factors, including climate change, into the investment process. SLC Management's Global Head of ESG, appointed in 2021, is responsible for leading ESG strategies for SLC Management that deliver on Client mandates by building resilience, environmental and social performance, and risk mitigation into the firm's investment management activities. With the role being added in 2021, SLC Management is assessing its governance around sustainability and climate change.
At MFS, three governance bodies have responsibility for sustainable investing and stewardship activities. These groups set sustainable investing strategy, monitor progress and broadly ensure that MFS considers material risks such as climate change in its investment activities:
•MFS Sustainability Executive Group (SEG) oversees MFS' sustainability strategy (membership includes MFS' CEO, President, Chief Investment Office, Head of Sustainability and Stewardship, General Counsel and other senior leaders directly responsible for the integration of sustainability across the firm).
•MFS Responsible Investing Committee (membership includes MFS' president, general counsel and chief compliance officer), and
•MFS Proxy Voting Committee (membership includes senior leaders from MFS' investment, legal, compliance and global investment operations departments).
In addition, MFS' head of sustainable investing and stewardship chairs a sustainable investing steering group with members from across asset classes and investment styles. The steering group established a climate change working group to stimulate discussions across the investment team and develop practical frameworks to inform MFS' investment decision-making process and corporate engagement strategy in these areas.
We anticipate evolving our governance structures over time to ensure we maintain effective decision-making and appropriate accountability.
Risk Management
Climate risk management is integrated into our Risk Framework, Governance, and supporting processes (as noted in preceding sections 1 through 8 and under Governance above).
Our definition of climate risk includes physical impacts of climate change and impacts of the transition to a lower-carbon economy. These impacts can include, but are not limited to, damage to owned and operated real assets including real estate and infrastructure, a reduction in the values of investments in public and private fixed income and non-fixed income assets tied to fossil fuels and carbon intensive industries, litigation risk to a company or sector in which we invest, health impacts to affected populations, and socio-economic, geo-political and regulatory changes.
From an investment perspective, climate-related risks (where material to an industry or asset class) are integrated into the risk management process as we look to make long-term investments that are better positioned to withstand issues related to climate change. We incorporate a number of different analyses into our assessment of climate risks through both stand-alone analysis of physical risks by geographic region and through the assessment of business model and carbon transition risks. Climate-related risk types monitored may include acute and chronic physical risks and transition risks related to current and emerging regulation, legal, technology, market and reputation or consumer preferences.
Each of the Company’s asset management businesses takes its own approach to identifying, assessing, monitoring and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities, based on the asset classes it invests in. Examples of approaches include:
•proprietary climate risk surveys to identify, assess and respond to climate-related risks and opportunities,
•portfolio and asset level risk analysis to inform investment decisions and resilience plans,
•emissions data analysis,
•stranded asset modeling,
•carbon intensity monitoring and benchmarking, and
•individual as well as collaborative engagements on topics such as decarbonization.
Approaches are refined periodically. For example, in 2021, SLC Management updated its proprietary ESG Plus scoring methodology to place a larger emphasis on emissions profiles for non-financial corporates. This enhanced analysis looks to standardize the assessment of transition risks and to continue to build capabilities within our investment teams around company-level carbon assessments. When considering a longer term investment in fossil fuel related companies, SLC Management reviews the companies' carbon reduction plans and ability to transition to a lower-carbon future.
Additionally, an environmental issue, whether caused by climate change or other factors, on a property owned or operated by us could have financial or reputational impacts. We maintain an environmental risk management program to help monitor and manage real estate investment assets from losses due to environmental issues and to ensure compliance with applicable laws. We maintain insurance policies to cover certain environmental risks on owned assets. We have implemented a business continuity program to facilitate the recovery of critical business operations if an environmental issue affects a location where we conduct operations. The Company’s corporate real estate group, together with our building owners and property managers, assesses the potential effects of climate change-related hazards and examines ways to improve the ability of our buildings to withstand these hazards. These hazards include tornadoes, flash floods, ice storms and coastline flooding.
Metrics and Targets
The Company has set a goal to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 for both its investments and operations with interim targets to be announced in 2022. As an asset owner, the Company plans to achieve net-zero GHG emissions in its general account, managed by SLC Management. MFS, SLGI Asset Management and SLC Management companies InfraRed and BGO have joined the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, an international group of asset managers committed to supporting the goal of net-zero emissions by 2050 or sooner.
74 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
We will target a 50% absolute reduction of GHG emissions in our operations by 2030, relative to 2019. This target includes emissions reductions from our offices and corporate travel(1). We will realign our GHG emissions reporting in 2022 with this new target. We have also set a goal of carbon-neutrality for our global operations beginning in 2021, to be achieved through reduction efforts and the purchase of high-quality offsets for the remainder.
The Company is targeting $20 billion in new sustainable investments from 2021 to 2025 across its general account and Client investments, which are managed by SLC Management. Investments include, but are not limited to, renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable buildings, clean transportation, water management, and social infrastructure projects.
We report our global Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions from company-occupied real estate and real estate investments under our financial control as well as Scope 3 GHG emissions(2) from corporate travel and as available, real estate-related sources such as water, waste and tenant- or landlord-paid utilities in our annual Sustainability Report available at www.sunlife.com/sustainability.
Please refer to Environmental and Social Risk in our AIF for additional climate-related risk discussion.
v. Operational Risk
Risk Description
Operational risk is the risk of loss (financial and non-financial) resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Operational risk is present in all of our business activities and encompasses a broad range of risks as described below. Operational risk is embedded in the practices utilized to manage other risks and, therefore, if not managed effectively, operational risk can impact our ability to manage other key risks.
Operational Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of operational risk management practices and controls, as outlined below:
•Operational risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Board Committees.
•Risk appetite limits have been established in Operational Risk.
•Comprehensive Operational Risk Management Framework, Policies, guidelines and practices are in place.
•Our governance practices, corporate values, Code of Conduct and Company-wide approach to managing risk set the foundation for mitigating operational risks.
•Our Code of Conduct sets the tone for a strong ethical culture, and we regularly review and update the Code of Conduct to ensure that it continues to meet the expectations of regulators and other stakeholders. All our directors and employees must reconfirm annually their understanding of and commitment to comply with the Code of Conduct.
•We have established appropriate internal controls and systems for talent acquisition, rewards and development programs that attract, build and retain top talent and create strong succession plans as well as compensation programs, and we provide ongoing training to our people.
•We conduct regular monitoring of employee engagement to ensure we create and maintain a work environment where all employees are welcome and able to contribute effectively.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse scenarios.
•We mitigate a portion of our operational risk exposure through our corporate insurance program by purchasing insurance coverage that seeks to provide insurance against unexpected material losses resulting from events such as criminal activity, property loss or damage and liability exposures, or that satisfies legal requirements and contractual obligations.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
Specific operational risks and our risk management strategies are discussed below in further detail and in the Risk Factor section in the AIF.
Information Security and Privacy Risks
Information and technology are used in almost all aspects of our business and operations. As part of our Client strategy, we continue to enhance the digital side of our business to support and enable new business models and processes, that are more personal, proactive and predictive.
Our business and the successful implementation of our digital strategy are dependent on various factors including maintaining a secure environment for our Clients, employees and other parties' information. This requires the effective and secure use, management and oversight of information and physical assets. We engage with various stakeholders and leverage emerging technologies, including digital, mobile applications, cloud computing, artificial intelligence and robotic process automation. These technologies are used to collect, process and maintain information relating to business transactions and financial reporting, as well as the personal information of our Clients and employees. We also obtain services from a wide range of third-party service providers and have outsourced some business and information technology functions in various jurisdictions.
(1)Scope 1 and 2 emissions of corporate offices globally, and Scope 3 emissions resulting from the water supply and landlord-paid utility services to these offices, as well as from corporate travel, per the GHG Protocol.
(2)Scope 3 emissions related to utilities for Corporate Real Estate where utility bills are paid by the landlord are prorated for Sun Life's share of the building’s total gross leasable area and Real Estate Investment properties only include consumption where there is submetering. Scope 3 emissions from utilities that are directly billed to third party is excluded from reporting as it is considered outside of Sun Life's financial control.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 75
There continues to be an increasing number of information security compromises and privacy breaches across industry sectors, governments and individuals. The increasing scope and complexity of malicious activity poses a significant risk to our systems and these risks may be exacerbated by the breadth of our operations, our geographic footprint and the complexity of our technology systems. The risk of information security compromises and privacy breaches has also increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as individuals continue remote working arrangements. A serious security or privacy breach of either an internal or third-party service provider’s computer system that contains sensitive business, Client and/or employee information may result in business interruption, theft or misuse of confidential information, regulatory penalties and scrutiny, litigation, reputational damage and may have an adverse impact on current and future business opportunities with our Clients, employees and business relationships.
We continue investing in people, processes and technology to strengthen our abilities to respond to the evolving threat landscape. Our Information Security framework is overseen by the Chief Information Security Officer, supported by senior leadership and by our Operational Risk Management Framework. Our information security framework and governance controls (policies, procedures, training) are aligned with recognized industry standards and are compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
Our well-established security controls and processes are intent on protecting our information and computer systems and the information entrusted to us by our Clients and employees. Our protection strategy leverages information security risk assessments and privacy impact assessments to evaluate potential risks. The security framework also includes technology and process safeguards and regularly promotes secure behavioural practices. As part of our layered security approach, we deliver general security awareness training sessions to all employees every year that is reinforced with regular awareness resources and activities.
Many jurisdictions in which we do business are developing and implementing cyber security reporting requirements and more stringent consumer privacy legislation. Our global privacy program monitors adherence to our global privacy commitments, local laws and local privacy policies. We have also established a network of privacy officers across the Company who monitor emerging privacy legislation and provide guidance on handling personal information and help manage, report and resolve any privacy incidents that may occur. We also conduct privacy training, provide regular monitoring and reporting and carry cyber risk insurance to help mitigate the impact of privacy incidents.
Human Resources Risk
Our ability to achieve business objectives can be adversely affected if we are unable to attract, retain or effectively deploy resources with the in-depth knowledge and necessary skills required, or are unable to design compensation programs that effectively drive employee behaviour. Failure to manage Human Resources risk can also lead to direct financial and reputational loss including losses arising from activity that is inconsistent with Human Rights or employment laws or health and safety regulations.
To mitigate this risk, we have comprehensive Human Resource policies, practices and programs in place to ensure compliance with employment legislation, minimize the risk of employee misconduct, and proactively develop employee skills, capabilities and behaviours to meet future business needs.
Regulatory Compliance, Legal and Conduct Risk
We are subject to extensive regulatory oversight by financial services regulators in the jurisdictions in which we conduct business. In recent years, there has been an increased focus by regulators globally on Client fairness, conduct, anti-money laundering, privacy and data governance. Failure to comply with applicable laws or to conduct our business consistent with changing regulatory or public expectations could adversely impact our reputation and may lead to regulatory investigations, examinations, proceedings, settlements, penalties, fines, restrictions on our business, litigation or an inability to carry out our business strategy.
Our Chief Compliance Officer oversees our comprehensive Enterprise-wide compliance framework, which is consistent with regulatory guidance from OSFI and other regulators. This framework promotes proactive, risk-based management of compliance and regulatory risk, and includes Enterprise-wide and business segment policies, standards and operating guidelines, programs to promote awareness of laws and regulations that impact us, ongoing monitoring of emerging legal issues and regulatory changes and training programs. The employee training programs include anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing, anti-bribery and corruption, privacy and information security risk management. Effective governance, oversight and implementation is a coordinated effort between first and second lines of defense functions. Second line oversight relies on a network of compliance officers. In addition to the second line, the general counsel in each business segment provides advice. The Chief Compliance Officer reports regularly to the Board and Board Committees on the state of compliance, key compliance risks, emerging regulatory trends, escalation of key issues and key risk indicators.
Information Technology Risk
The use of technology and computer systems is essential in supporting and maintaining business operations. We use technology to support virtually all aspects of our business and operations. The rapidly changing business environment increases the risk of our technology strategy not being agile enough to adapt to new business demands in a timely manner leading to financial losses, increased costs and the inability to meet Client needs.
To manage the risks associated with our technology infrastructure and applications, we have implemented a number of policies, directives and controls through our technology approval and risk governance model to ensure ongoing systems availability, stability and currency.
Third-Party Risk
We engage in a variety of third-party relationships, including with distributors, independent contractors, outsourcing service providers and suppliers. Our profitability or reputation could be impacted if these third parties are unable to meet their ongoing service commitments or fail to perform to expected standards.
To manage these risks, we have established Company-wide policies and guidelines which are consistent with OSFI's and other local regulatory requirements, and which set out our requirements to identify, assess, manage, monitor and report on third-party risks. Our program includes third-
76 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
party risk assessments and enhanced due diligence if a supplier will have access to any personal data and/or confidential information or access to non-public systems. The key elements and risks associated with the third party are documented in the form of a written agreement, and the company monitors performance of its third parties in a manner that is commensurate to the size, risk, scope and complexity of the third-party relationship.
Business Disruption Risk
Our businesses are dependent on the availability of trained employees, physical locations to conduct operations and access to technology. A significant business disruption to our operations can result if one or more of these key elements are negatively impacted. System disruptions as well as unanticipated events, including pandemics, can negatively affect staff, preventing them from getting to work or from operating business processes.
To manage this risk, we have implemented a business continuity program to facilitate the recovery of critical business operations. This program encompasses business continuity, crisis management and disaster recovery planning. Our policy, guidelines and operating procedures establish consistent processes designed to ensure that key business functions can continue and normal operations can resume effectively and efficiently should a major disruption occur. In addition, to regularly update and test business continuity plans for critical business operations, we conduct mandatory business continuity awareness training for all employees annually and have off-site backup facilities and failover capability designed to minimize downtime and accelerate recovery time in the event of a major disruption.
Model Risk
We use complex models to support many business functions including product development and pricing, capital management, valuation, financial reporting, planning, hedging, asset-liability management, risk management and advanced analytics (such as artificial intelligence, predictive modeling and decision making algorithms). Model risk is the risk of loss, either in the form of financial loss, inappropriate or poor business decisions, damage to reputation, or other adverse impact, arising from inaccurate model outputs or incorrect use or interpretation of model outputs.
To manage model risk, we have established robust, Company-wide model risk management procedures over the models' life cycle with respect to building, using, changing and retiring models. The policy and operating guidelines set out minimum, risk-based requirements to ensure that models are effectively controlled, maintained and appropriately understood by users.
Information Management Risk
As an international provider of financial services, we deal with extensive information across a number of countries. Information management risk is the inability to capture, manage, retain and appropriately dispose of business records, the inability to provide data that is fit for purpose, accurate, complete or timely to support business decisions, and the inability to manage data location and cross-border appropriately. Failure to manage these risks could have financial or reputational impacts, and may lead to regulatory proceedings, penalties and litigation.
To manage and monitor information management risk, we have an internal control framework, data governance and record management practices in place. Additional information on operational risk can be found in the Risk Factors section in the AIF.
vi. Liquidity Risk
Risk Description
Liquidity risk is the possibility that we will not be able to fund all cash outflow commitments and collateral requirements as they fall due. This includes the risk of being forced to sell assets at depressed prices resulting in realized losses on sale. This risk also includes restrictions on our ability to efficiently allocate capital among our subsidiaries due to various market and regulatory constraints on the movement of funds. Our funding obligations arise in connection with the payment of policyholder benefits, expenses, reinsurance settlements, asset purchases, investment commitments, interest on debt, and dividends on common and preferred shares. Sources of available cash flow include general fund premiums and deposits, investment related inflows (such as maturities, principal repayments, investment income and proceeds of asset sales), proceeds generated from financing activities, and dividends and interest payments from subsidiaries. We have various financing transactions and derivative contracts under which we may be required to pledge collateral or to make payments to our counterparties for the decline in market value of specified assets. The amount of collateral or payments required may increase under certain circumstances (such as changes to interest rates, credit spreads, equity markets or foreign exchange rates), which could adversely affect our liquidity.
Liquidity Risk Management Governance and Control
We generally maintain a conservative liquidity position and employ a wide range of liquidity risk management practices and controls, which are described below:
•Liquidity risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Risk Committee.
•Liquidity is managed in accordance with our Asset Liability Management Policy and operating guidelines.
•Liquidity contingency plans are maintained for the management of liquidity in a liquidity event.
•Stress testing is performed by comparing liquidity coverage risk metrics under a one-month stress scenario to our policy thresholds. These liquidity coverage risk metrics are measured and managed at the enterprise and legal entity levels.
•Stress testing of our collateral is performed by comparing collateral coverage ratios to our policy thresholds.
•Cash Management and asset-liability management programs support our ability to maintain our financial position by ensuring that sufficient cash flow and liquid assets are available to cover potential funding requirements. We invest in various types of assets with a view of matching them to our liabilities of various durations.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
•We actively manage and monitor our capital and asset levels, and the diversification and credit quality of our investments.
•Various credit facilities for general corporate purposes are maintained.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 77
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of our significant financial liabilities and contractual commitments as at December 31, 2021 and 2020: |
|
| Financial Liabilities and Contractual Obligations |
December 31, 2021 ($ millions) | Within 1 year | 1 year to 3 years | 3 years to 5 years | Over 5 years | Total |
Insurance and investment contract liabilities(1) | | $ | 14,781 | | | $ | 8,271 | | | $ | 8,383 | | | $ | 344,533 | | | $ | 375,968 | |
Senior debentures and unsecured financing(2) | | 14 | | | 28 | | | 28 | | | 555 | | | 625 | |
Subordinated debt(2) | | 188 | | | 375 | | | 375 | | | 7,587 | | | 8,525 | |
| Bond repurchase agreements | | 2,324 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,324 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(3) | | 7,284 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7,284 | |
Lease liabilities(4) | | 151 | | | 276 | | | 188 | | | 335 | | | 950 | |
| Secured borrowings from mortgage securitization | | 150 | | | 377 | | | 869 | | | 817 | | | 2,213 | |
Borrowed funds(2) | | 116 | | | 94 | | | 51 | | | 229 | | | 490 | |
Credit facilities(3) | | 441 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 441 | |
| Total liabilities | | $ | 25,449 | | | $ | 9,421 | | | $ | 9,894 | | | $ | 354,056 | | | $ | 398,820 | |
Contractual commitments:(5) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contractual loans, equities and mortgages | | $ | 1,184 | | | $ | 1,023 | | | $ | 407 | | | $ | 1,597 | | | $ | 4,211 | |
| Total contractual commitments | | $ | 1,184 | | | $ | 1,023 | | | $ | 407 | | | $ | 1,597 | | | $ | 4,211 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2020 ($ millions) | Within 1 year | 1 year to 3 years | 3 years to 5 years | Over 5 years | Total |
Insurance and investment contract liabilities(1) | | $ | 14,735 | | | $ | 8,317 | | | $ | 8,641 | | | $ | 311,570 | | | $ | 343,263 | |
Senior debentures and unsecured financing(2) | | 323 | | | 28 | | | 28 | | | 555 | | | 934 | |
Subordinated debt(2) | | 143 | | | 285 | | | 285 | | | 5,661 | | | 6,374 | |
| Bond repurchase agreements | | 2,208 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,208 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(3) | | 6,992 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,992 | |
Lease liabilities(4) | | 157 | | | 287 | | | 226 | | | 412 | | | 1,082 | |
| Secured borrowings from mortgage securitization | | 292 | | | 219 | | | 741 | | | 865 | | | 2,117 | |
Borrowed funds(2) | | 54 | | | 128 | | | 32 | | | 256 | | | 470 | |
Credit facilities(3) | | 338 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 338 | |
| Total liabilities | | $ | 25,242 | | | $ | 9,264 | | | $ | 9,953 | | | $ | 319,319 | | | $ | 363,778 | |
Contractual commitments:(5) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contractual loans, equities and mortgages | | $ | 777 | | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 553 | | | $ | 1,454 | | | $ | 3,583 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total contractual commitments | | $ | 777 | | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 553 | | | $ | 1,454 | | | $ | 3,583 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) These amounts represent the undiscounted estimated cash flows of insurance and investment contract liabilities on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. These cash flows include estimates related to the timing and payment of death and disability claims, policy surrenders, policy maturities, annuity payments, minimum guarantees on segregated fund products, policyholder dividends, amounts on deposit, commissions and premium taxes offset by contractual future premiums and fees on in-force contracts. These estimated cash flows are based on the best estimated assumptions used in the determination of insurance and investment contract liabilities. Due to the use of assumptions, actual cash flows will differ from these estimates. |
(2) Payments due based on maturity dates and include expected interest payments. Actual redemption of certain securities may occur sooner as some include an option for the issuer to call the security at par at an earlier date. |
(3) Reflects a change in presentation for our credit facility effective January 1, 2020. We have updated our prior period to reflect this change in presentation. |
(4) Lease liabilities are included on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position due to the implementation of IFRS 16 Leases ("IFRS 16"). |
(5) Contractual commitments and operating lease commitments are not reported on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Additional information on these commitments is included in Note 23 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Additional information on liquidity risk can be found in Note 10 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements and the Risk Factors section in the 2021 AIF.
78 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
vii. Other Risks
Risks relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Pandemics, epidemics or outbreaks of an infectious disease could have an adverse impact on our results, business, financial condition or liquidity, and could result in changes to the way we operate. The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures imposed by governments around the world to limit its spread including travel restrictions, business closures, social distancing protocols, school closures, quarantines, and restrictions on gatherings and events, have disrupted the global economy, financial markets, supply chains, business activity and productivity in unprecedented ways. The duration and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the countries in which we operate are varied and cannot currently be determined. Containment measures continue to impact global economic activity, including the pace and magnitude of recovery as well as contributing to increased market volatility supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures, and changes to the macroeconomic environment. Governments, monetary authorities, regulators and financial institutions, have taken, and continue to take, actions in support of the economy and financial system. These actions include fiscal, monetary and other financial measures to increase liquidity, and to provide financial aid to individuals and businesses. While some programs and temporary measures have come to an end, others remain in place or have continued to be developed in an effort to support the economy. Additional risks are emerging around governments' withdrawal of COVID-19 pandemic support measures, and how they will seek to finance the unprecedented level of support. If the COVID-19 pandemic is prolonged, the adverse impact on the global economy could deepen, augmenting financial market declines or volatility, corporate insolvency risks and negative household wealth impacts. The continuing or worsening of the economic and market conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and impact on clients, industries and individual countries could have a material adverse effect on our businesses including sales, fee income, investment performance, expenses, results of operations, corporate reputation and financial condition. Sustained adverse effects could negatively impact profitability and also make it difficult for us to access capital markets, could impact our liquidity and capital position, or may result in downgrades in our credit ratings. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business, results of operations, corporate reputation and financial condition, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in the Risk Factors section in our AIF and section J - Risk Management in this document. This includes, but is not limited to:
•Market risks, such as equity, interest rates and spread, real estate, and foreign currency risks, including impact on fee income;
•Insurance risk, including higher than expected mortality and, morbidity claims and adverse policyholder behaviour including but not limited to higher than expected policy lapses, withdrawals, and surrenders;
•Credit risk, including defaults, impairments and downgrades;
•Business and strategic risk including economic and political risk, business strategy implementation risk, distribution risk, expense risk, changes in Client behaviour, sales, investment performance, and changes in legal and regulatory environment;
•Operational risk, including information security and privacy risk, human resources risks, regulatory compliance, legal and conduct risk, information technology risk, processing risk, third-party risk, and business disruption risk, and change management risk with the need to quickly implement and execute new programs and procedures to support Clients, advisors, employees, products, and services; and
•Liquidity risk including collateral, and payment deferrals on invested assets or policyholder insurance premium impacts.
While rising vaccination rates have supported an easing of containment measures in some geographies, progress towards re-opening has been accompanied by resurgences in the spread of COVID-19 including variants and the re-imposition of restrictions in other geographies. The overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is still uncertain and dependent on the progression of the virus, including variants, mass vaccine production and distribution, vaccine efficacy, public acceptance of containment measures and vaccine adoption, the subsequent reduction in rates of infection and the actions taken by governments, monetary authorities, regulators, financial institutions, businesses and individuals, which could vary by country and result in differing outcomes. Given the extent of the circumstances, it is difficult to reliably measure or predict the potential impact of this uncertainty on our future financial results.
Consistent with the protocols and programs established in our Risk Management Framework, we continue to manage the risks that arise when providing products and services to Clients, which are in line with our Purpose to help Client achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives.
IFRS 17 and 9
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts ("IFRS 17") and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments ("IFRS 9") are effective for Canadian insurance companies for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023.
The adoption of IFRS 17 will be a material change to the accounting and reporting process for the Company. We have established a transition program for IFRS 17 and 9 and have dedicated significant resources to execute and oversee the multi-year cross functional plan to manage operational, regulatory, and business and strategic risks associated with the implementation of these standards.
•Operational risk - the standards requires a more expansive set of data, introduces complex estimation techniques, computational requirements and disclosures, which necessitate a major transformation to various actuarial and financial reporting processes, tools, and systems.
•Business and strategic risk - the standards may create additional volatility in our financial results and capital position. Volatility of reported results may require changes to business strategies and the introduction of new or modified non-GAAP measures to explain our results. The impact to business strategy could include changes to hedging and investment strategy, product strategy and the use of reinsurance and, as a result, could impact our exposures to other risks such as counterparty risk and liquidity risk.
•Regulatory Capital risk - the regulatory capital framework in Canada currently based on IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts ("IFRS 4") will align with IFRS 17 effective January 1, 2023. The impact to Sun Life from this change is currently uncertain. While OSFI has stated that it intends to maintain capital frameworks consistent with current capital policies and to minimize potential capital impacts at the industry level, the impact for individual companies may vary. OSFI will make changes to the LICAT guideline to reflect IFRS 17 and is consulting directly with key stakeholders. LICAT guideline changes for Segregated Fund Guarantee capital are also planned to take effect January 1, 2025. OSFI has been engaging the industry in testing of new Segregated Fund Guarantee capital requirements, and the impact will not be known until the final calibrations are completed.
Additional information on other risks can be found in the Risk Factor section in our 2021 AIF.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 79
| | | | | |
| K. Additional Financial Disclosure | |
1. Selected Annual Information
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions, after-tax, unless otherwise stated) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| Total revenue | 35,688 | | 43,337 | | 39,679 | |
| Common shareholders' net income (loss) | 3,934 | | 2,404 | | 2,618 | |
| Reported basic earnings per share ($) | 6.72 | | 4.11 | | 4.42 | |
| Reported earnings per share (diluted) ($) | 6.69 | | 4.10 | | 4.40 | |
| Total assets | 345,370 | | 323,011 | | 297,202 | |
2. Items related to Statement of Operations
i. Business Group Summary Statements of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | 2020 |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | Canada | U.S. | Asset Management | Asia | Corporate | Total | Total |
| Net premiums | 14,178 | | 5,371 | | — | | 3,394 | | 110 | | 23,053 | | 23,738 | |
| Net investment income | 3,069 | | 546 | | 20 | | 1,060 | | (62) | | 4,633 | | 12,718 | |
| Fee income | 1,611 | | 81 | | 5,835 | | 642 | | (167) | | 8,002 | | 6,881 | |
| Revenue | 18,858 | | 5,998 | | 5,855 | | 5,096 | | (119) | | 35,688 | | 43,337 | |
| Gross claims and benefits paid | 10,921 | | 5,706 | | — | | 1,569 | | 526 | | 18,722 | | 18,307 | |
Changes in insurance contract liabilities, investment contract liabilities and reinsurance assets | 3,030 | | (939) | | — | | 748 | | (689) | | 2,150 | | 13,300 | |
| Operating expenses, commissions and premium taxes | 3,791 | | 1,538 | | 4,512 | | 1,613 | | 363 | | 11,817 | | 10,441 | |
| Reinsurance expenses (recoveries) | (1,281) | | (979) | | — | | (157) | | (8) | | (2,425) | | (2,353) | |
| Interest expense | 190 | | 49 | | 79 | | 65 | | (56) | | 327 | | 355 | |
| Total benefits and expenses | 16,651 | | 5,375 | | 4,591 | | 3,838 | | 136 | | 30,591 | | 40,050 | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 384 | | 124 | | 372 | | 113 | | (266) | | 727 | | 495 | |
| Dividends on preferred shares and distributions on other equity instruments | — | | — | | — | | — | | 101 | | 101 | | 94 | |
| Non-controlling interests and participating policyholders' income in net income of subsidiaries | 265 | — | | — | | 70 | | — | | 335 | | 294 | |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 1,558 | | 499 | | 892 | | 1,075 | | (90) | | 3,934 | | 2,404 | |
Canada
Canada's revenue decreased by $2.8 billion or 13% in 2021 compared to 2020, reflecting lower net investment income from fair values changes of assets, partially offset by higher net premiums in GRS and Individual Insurance & Wealth.
U.S.
U.S.'s revenue decreased by $2.1 billion or 26% in 2021 compared to 2020, reflecting lower net investment income from fair values changes of assets.
Asset Management
Asset Management's revenue increased by $0.8 billion or 16% in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by higher fee income in SLC Management and MFS.
Asia
Asia's revenue decreased by $2.8 billion in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by lower net premiums in International Hubs and lower net investment income from fair values changes of assets.
Corporate
Corporate's revenue decreased by $0.8 billion in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by lower net investment income from fair value changes of assets.
80 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
ii. Revenue
Revenue includes: (i) premiums received on life and health insurance policies and fixed annuity products, net of premiums ceded to reinsurers; (ii) net investment income comprised of income earned on general fund assets, realized gains and losses on AFS assets and changes in the value of derivative instruments and assets designated as FVTPL and foreign exchange translation on assets and liabilities; and (iii) fee income received for services provided. Premium and deposit equivalents from ASO, as well as deposits received by the Company on investment contracts such as segregated funds, mutual funds and managed funds are not included in revenue; however, the Company does receive fee income from these contracts, which is included in revenue. Fee income and ASO premium and deposit equivalents are an important part of our business and as a result, revenue does not fully represent sales and other activity taking place during the respective periods.
Net investment income can experience volatility arising from the quarterly fluctuation in the value of FVTPL assets and foreign currency changes on assets and liabilities, which may in turn affect the comparability of revenue from period to period. The change in fair value of FVTPL assets is driven largely by market-related factors such as interest rates, credit spreads and equity returns. The debt and equity securities that support insurance contract liabilities are generally designated as FVTPL and changes in fair values of these assets are recorded in net investment income in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in the fair values of the FVTPL assets supporting insurance contract liabilities are largely offset by a corresponding change in the liabilities.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| ($ millions) | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| Premiums | | | | | |
| Life insurance | | | | 10,925 | | 11,812 | |
| Health insurance | | | | 10,664 | | 10,649 | |
| Annuities | | | | 3,917 | | 3,729 | |
| Gross | | | | 25,506 | | 26,190 | |
| Life insurance | | | | (1,563) | | (1,573) | |
| Health insurance | | | | (611) | | (587) | |
| Annuities | | | | (279) | | (292) | |
| Less: Ceded | | | | 2,453 | | 2,452 | |
| Net premiums | | | | 23,053 | | 23,738 | |
| Net investment income (loss) | | | | | |
| Interest and other investment income | | | | 6,272 | | 5,407 | |
Fair value(1)(2) and foreign currency changes on assets and liabilities | | | | (1,785) | | 6,860 | |
Net gains (losses) on available-for-sale assets(2) | | | | 146 | | 451 | |
| Net Investment income (loss) | | | | 4,633 | | 12,718 | |
| Fee income | | | | 8,002 | | 6,881 | |
| Total revenue | | | | 35,688 | | 43,337 | |
(1)Represents the change in FVTPL assets and liabilities.
(2)The prior year included an AFS gain of $282 million relating to the sale of debt securities and a loss of $342 million as a result of the termination of our fair value derivatives, both of which were related to the repayment of our senior financing obligation. Our senior financing obligation related to U.S. statutory regulatory capital requirements for In-force Management. For additional information, refer to Note 12 in our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue decreased by $7.6 billion or 18% in 2021 compared to 2020, reflecting lower net investment income from fair values changes of assets, partially offset by higher fee income. Foreign exchange translation decreased revenue by $1,287 million.
Gross premiums increased by $0.7 billion or 3% in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by increases in Canada.
Ceded premiums of $2.5 billion in 2021 were in line with 2020.
Net investment income decreased by $8.1 billion or 64% in 2021 compared to 2020, mainly from fair value changes of assets reflecting the impact of interest rates, credit spreads, as well as seed investments and AFS gains(1) in the prior year.
Fee income increased by $1.1 billion or 16% in 2021, compared to 2020, driven by Asset Management and Canada.
(1) Our senior financing obligation related to U.S. statutory regulatory capital requirements for In-force Management. For additional information, refer to Note 12 of our 2020 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 81
iii. Benefits and Expenses
| | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | 2021 | 2020 |
| Benefits and Expenses | | |
| Gross claims and benefits paid | 18,722 | | 18,307 | |
Changes in insurance contract liabilities, investment contract liabilities and reinsurance assets(1) | 2,150 | | 13,300 | |
| Operating expenses, commissions and premium taxes | 11,817 | | 10,441 | |
| Reinsurance expenses (recoveries) | (2,425) | | (2,353) | |
| Interest expense | 327 | | 355 | |
| Total benefits and expenses | 30,591 | | 40,050 | |
(1) Includes changes in insurance contract liabilities, investment contract liabilities, reinsurance assets and segregated funds. For more information, see Note 10.F in our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total benefits and expenses decreased by $9.5 billion or 24% in 2021 compared to 2020, primarily driven by decreases in insurance contract liabilities, partially offset by lower net transfers from segregated funds in Canada.
Gross claims and benefits paid of $18.7 billion in 2021 was relatively consistent with 2020.
Changes in insurance contract liabilities, investment contract liabilities and reinsurance assets decreased by $11.2 billion in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by Canada, the U.S. and Asia.
Operating expenses, commissions and premium taxes increased $1.4 billion or 13% in 2021compared to 2020, reflecting higher expenses supporting business growth, higher compensation costs and project spend, and $364 million of unfavourable foreign exchange translation. For additional information, see Note 18 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reinsurance recoveries of $2.4 billion and interest expense of $0.3 billion were relatively consistent with 2020.
iv. Taxes
Income Taxes
In 2021, we had an income tax expense of $727 million on reported net income before taxes of $5,097 million, which resulted in an effective income tax rate of 14.3%. This compares to an income tax expense of $495 million on reported net income before taxes of $3,287 million and an effective income tax rate of 15.1% in 2020.
On an underlying basis(1), in 2021, we had an income tax expense of $578 million on our underlying net income before taxes of $4,275 million, representing an effective income tax rate of 13.5% which is slightly below our expected range of 15% to 20%. This compares to an income tax expense of $808 million on our underlying net income before taxes of $4,176 million and an effective income tax rate of 19.3% in 2020, which was within our expected range of 15% to 20%.
See section D - Profitability - 5 - Income taxes in this document for additional information on our effective tax rates.
Other Taxes
In addition to income taxes, we pay various indirect taxes in jurisdictions in which we carry on business. Indirect taxes include premium taxes, investment income tax, payroll related taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, business taxes and other taxes, as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | 2021 | 2020 |
| Income tax expense | 727 | | 495 | |
| Indirect taxes | | |
Premium taxes (net of premium taxes on ceded business)(1) | 396 | | 395 | |
| Payroll taxes | 202 | | 190 | |
| Property taxes | 126 | | 124 | |
| Goods and services tax ("GST"), harmonized tax ("HST") and other sales taxes | 125 | | 121 | |
| Business taxes and other | 58 | | 30 | |
| Total indirect taxes | 907 | | 860 | |
| Total taxes | 1,634 | | 1,355 | |
| Reported effective income tax rate | 14.3 | % | 15.1 | % |
| Total taxes as a percentage of net income before deduction of total taxes | 27.2 | % | 32.7 | % |
(1) Premium taxes include investment income tax.
(1) Our effective income tax rate on underlying net income is calculated using underlying net income and income tax expense associated with underlying net income, which excludes amounts attributable to participating policyholders.
82 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
3. Items related to Statements of Financial Position
i. Changes in Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Insurance contract liabilities balances before Other policy liabilities of $135.5 billion as at December 31, 2021, compared to $137.7 billion December 31, 2020, mainly due to balances arising from new policies, partially offset by changes in balances on in-force policies (which include fair value changes on FVTPL assets supporting insurance contract liabilities) and foreign exchange translation.
Total shareholders' equity, including preferred share capital, was $26.3 billion as at December 31, 2021, compared to $24.3 billion as at December 31, 2020. The change in total shareholders' equity included:
(i)total shareholders' net income of $4.0 billion, before preferred share dividends of $0.1 billion; and
(ii)the issuance of $1 billion principal amount of other equity instruments; partially offset by
(iii)common share dividend payments of $1.4 billion; and
(iv)redemptions of preferred shares of $1 billion.
ii. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we are engaged in a variety of financial arrangements. The principal purposes of these arrangements are to earn management fees and additional spread on a matched book of business and to reduce financing costs.
While most of these activities are reflected on our balance sheet with respect to assets and liabilities, certain of them are either not recorded on our balance sheet or are recorded on our balance sheet in amounts that differ from the full contract or notional amounts. The types of off-balance sheet activities we undertake primarily include asset securitizations and securities lending.
Asset Securitizations
In the past, we sold mortgage or bond assets to non-consolidated structured entities, which may also purchase investment assets from third parties. Our securitized AUM held by these non-consolidated structured entities were $nil as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
However, the majority of our securitization activities are recorded on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. We securitize multi-residential mortgages under the National Housing Act Mortgage-Backed Securities program sponsored by the CMHC. The securitization of the multi-residential mortgages with the CMHC does not qualify for de-recognition and remains on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Additional information on this program can be found in Note 5 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Securities Lending
We lend securities in our investment portfolio to other institutions for short periods to generate additional fee income. We conduct our program only with well-established, reputable banking institutions that carry a minimum credit rating of "AA". Collateral, which exceeds the fair value of the loaned securities, is deposited by the borrower with a lending agent, usually a securities custodian, and maintained by the lending agent until the underlying security has been returned to us. We monitor the fair value of the loaned securities on a daily basis with additional collateral obtained or refunded as the fair value fluctuates. Certain arrangements allow us to invest the cash collateral received for the securities loaned. Loaned securities are recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as Invested Assets. As at December 31, 2021, we loaned securities with a carrying value of $9.9 billion for which the collateral held was $9.9 billion. This is consistent to loaned securities of $2.0 billion, with collateral of $2.1 billion as at December 31, 2020. Of the collateral held, we held cash collateral of $51 million as at December 31, 2021 ($306 million as at December 31, 2020), which is recognized on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
iii. Goodwill and Intangibles Impairment
The Company completed its annual goodwill and indefinite life intangible asset impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2021. There were no goodwill impairment charges in 2021 or 2020. Impairment charges on intangible assets of $9 million were recognized in 2021 and there were impairment charges of $11 million in 2020.
iv. Commitments, Guarantees, Contingencies and Reinsurance Matters
In the normal course of business, we enter into leasing agreements, outsourcing arrangements and agreements involving indemnities to third parties. We are also engaged in arbitration proceedings from time to time with certain companies that have contracts to provide reinsurance to the Company. Information regarding our commitments, guarantees and contingencies are summarized in Note 23 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. A table summarizing our significant financial liabilities and contractual obligations can be found in this MD&A in the section J - Risk Management - 9 - Risk Categories - vi - Liquidity Risk.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 83
4. Fourth Quarter 2021 Profitability
The following table reconciles our reported net income and underlying net income. The table also sets out the impacts of experience-related items attributable to reported net income and underlying net income in the fourth quarter of 2021 and 2020. All factors discussed in this document that impact our underlying net income are also applicable to reported net income.
| | | | | | | | |
| Q4'21 | Q4'20 |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | | |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | 1,078 | | 744 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | 156 | | 20 | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | (19) | | (42) | |
Other adjustments(1) | 43 | | (96) | |
Underlying net income(2) | 898 | | 862 | |
Reported ROE(2) | 18.0 | % | 13.3 | % |
Underlying ROE(2) | 15.0 | % | 15.4 | % |
Experience-related items attributable to reported net income and underlying net income(3) | | |
| Investing activity | 14 | | 3 | |
| Credit | 32 | | 18 | |
| Mortality | (71) | | (4) | |
| Morbidity | (34) | | 24 | |
| Policyholder behaviour | (10) | | (18) | |
| Expenses | (47) | | (53) | |
| Other experience | (1) | | (1) | |
| Total of experience-related items | (117) | | (31) | |
(1) Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment, including pre-tax amounts.
(2) Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(3) Experience-related items reflect the difference between actual experience during the reporting period and best estimate assumptions used in the determination of our insurance contract liabilities. Experience-related items are a part of the Sources of Earnings framework, and are calculated in accordance with OSFI Guideline D-9, Sources of Earnings Disclosures. Experience-related items from our India, China and Malaysia joint ventures and associates are recorded within other experience.
Q4'21 reported net income of $1,078 million increased $334 million or 45% compared to the same period in 2020, driven by a $297 million gain on the IPO of our India asset management joint venture and an increase in the value of our real estate investments, partially offset by a $153 million increase in SLC Management’s acquisition-related liabilities(1). Underlying net income of $898 million increased $36 million or 4%, driven by broad-based business growth across our pillars, with particular strength in asset management and wealth. Underlying net income also benefited from a lower effective tax rate in the quarter, largely offset by $113 million of ongoing COVID-19-related mortality and morbidity experience. Earnings on surplus were impacted by lower contributions from seed investments and available-for-sale ("AFS") gains. Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $33 million in reported net income and $22 million in underlying net income.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, our effective income tax rate on reported net income and underlying net income(2)was 4.2% and 4.8%, compared to 5.8% and 15.2% in the fourth quarter of 2020, respectively. In the fourth quarter of 2021, our effective tax rate on reported net income and underlying net income were below our expected range of 15% to 20% due to higher tax-exempt investment income and resolutions of prior year's tax matters. For additional information, refer to Note 20 in our Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2021.
(1)Reflects the changes in estimated future payments for acquisition-related contingent considerations and options to purchase remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates.
(1) Our effective income tax rate on underlying net income is calculated using underlying net income and income tax expense associated with underlying net income, which excludes amounts attributable to participating policyholders.
84 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Performance by Business Group - Fourth Quarter
We manage our operations and report our financial results in five business segments. The following section describes the operations and financial performance of Canada, U.S., Asset Management, Asia and Corporate.
The following table sets out the differences between our reported net income (loss) and underlying net income (loss) by business group.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Q4'21 |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | Canada | U.S. | Asset Management | Asia | Corporate | Total |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 356 | | 85 | | 140 | | 446 | | 51 | | 1,078 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | 90 | | 40 | | — | | 23 | | 3 | | 156 | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | 2 | | (19) | | — | | (2) | | — | | (19) | |
Other adjustments(1) | (2) | | (8) | | (242) | | 295 | | — | | 43 | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 266 | | 72 | | 382 | | 130 | | 48 | | 898 | |
| | | | | | |
| Q4'20 |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | Canada | U.S. | Asset Management | Asia | Corporate | Total |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 255 | | 88 | | 267 | | 132 | | 2 | | 744 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | 15 | | 2 | | — | | 3 | | — | | 20 | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | (3) | | (60) | | — | | 21 | | — | | (42) | |
Other adjustments(1) | — | | (2) | | (66) | | (8) | | (20) | | (96) | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 243 | | 148 | | 333 | | 116 | | 22 | | 862 | |
(1) Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment, including pre-tax amounts
(2) Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Canada
Canada's Q4'21 reported net income of $356 million increased $101 million or 40% compared to the same period in 2020, driven by an increase in the value of our real estate investments and higher equity markets. Underlying net income of $266 million increased $23 million or 9%, driven by experience-related items and business growth, partially offset by a $20 million investment impairment in earnings on surplus. Experience in the quarter included favourable credit, partially offset by unfavourable morbidity reflecting lower disability claims resolutions.
U.S.
U.S.'s Q4'21 reported net income of US$68 million ($85 million) increased US$2 million or 3% compared to the same period in 2020, driven by an increase in the value of our real estate investments and ACMA impacts, largely offset by the decrease in underlying net income of US$56 million ($76 million). Underlying net income decreased, primarily due to COVID-19-related experience, as working-age population mortality continued to be elevated in the fourth quarter. COVID-19-related experience of US$66 million included US$51 million from mortality and US$15 million primarily from disability.(1)
Lower earnings on surplus also contributed to the decrease, partially offset by favourable credit and other experience. Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $3 million in reported net income and $2 million in underlying net income.
The trailing four-quarter after-tax profit margin for Group Benefits was 5.7% as of the fourth quarter of 2021, compared to 8.0% as of the fourth quarter of 2020.
Asset Management
Asset Management's Q4'21 reported net income of $140 million decreased $127 million or 48% compared to the same period in 2020, reflecting a $153 million increase in SLC Management’s acquisition-related liabilities. Underlying net income of $382 million increased $49 million or 15%, driven by a 14% increase in MFS and an 18% increase in SLC Management. Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $7 million in reported net income and $12 million in underlying net income.
MFS's Q4'21 reported net income of US$234 million increased US$40 million or 21% compared to the same period in 2020, driven by the increase in underlying net income of US$42 million, partially offset by higher fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards. Underlying net income increased, driven by higher ANA, partially offset by higher variable compensation expenses. The pre-tax net operating profit margin ratio for MFS for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 43%, compared to 41% in the same period of 2020.
SLC Management's Q4'21 reported net loss was $155 million, compared to reported net income of $14 million in the same period in 2020, reflecting a $153 million increase in SLC Management’s acquisition-related liabilities(2). Underlying net income of $40 million increased $6 million or 18%, driven by higher AUM, including the Crescent acquisition which closed in January of 2021.
(1)In Canadian dollars, COVID-19-related experience of $83 million included $65 million from mortality and $18 million primarily from disability.
(2)Reflects the changes in estimated future payments for acquisition-related contingent considerations and options to purchase remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 85
Asia
Asia's Q4'21 reported net income of $446 million increased $314 million compared to the same period in 2020, driven by a $297 million gain from the IPO of our India asset management joint venture, ABSLAMC. Underlying net income of $130 million increased $14 million or 12%, driven by business growth and an investment impairment from the prior year, partially offset by experience-related items and foreign exchange translation. Experience in the quarter included COVID-19-related mortality of $12 million, mostly in the Philippines, and unfavourable experience in our joint ventures(1). Foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $23 million in reported net income and $8 million in underlying net income.
Corporate
Corporate's Q4'21 reported net income of $51 million increased $49 million compared to the same period in 2020, driven by the increase in underlying net income and restructuring costs in the prior year. Underlying net income of $48 million increased $26 million, benefiting from a lower effective tax rate in the quarter, partially offset by unfavourable expense experience.
5. Fourth Quarter 2021 Growth
Revenue was $12,995 million in the fourth quarter of 2021, an increase of $1,346 million or 12% compared to the same period in 2020, driven by fair value changes of assets and higher fee income. Foreign exchange translation decreased revenue by $183 million.
6. Quarterly Financial Results
The following table provides a summary of our results for the eight most recently completed quarters. A more complete discussion of our historical quarterly results can be found in our Interim and Annual MD&A for the relevant periods.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarterly results |
| ($ millions, unless otherwise noted) | Q4'21 | Q3'21 | Q2'21 | Q1'21 | Q4'20 | Q3'20 | Q2'20 | Q1'20 |
| Total revenue | 12,995 | | 8,510 | | 12,669 | | 1,514 | | 11,649 | | 10,032 | | 15,186 | | 6,470 | |
| Common shareholders' net income (loss) | | | | | | | | |
| Reported net income | 1,078 | | 1,019 | | 900 | | 937 | | 744 | | 750 | | 519 | | 391 | |
Less: Market-related impacts(1) | 156 | | 171 | | 91 | | 209 | | 20 | | (1) | | (187) | | (293) | |
Assumption changes and management actions(1) | (19) | | 95 | | 2 | | (4) | | (42) | | (53) | | 5 | | (53) | |
Other adjustments(1) | 43 | | (149) | | (76) | | (118) | | (96) | | (38) | | (38) | | (33) | |
Underlying net income(2) | 898 | | 902 | | 883 | | 850 | | 862 | | 842 | | 739 | | 770 | |
| Diluted EPS ($) | | | | | | | | |
| Reported | 1.83 | | 1.74 | | 1.53 | | 1.59 | | 1.27 | | 1.28 | | 0.88 | | 0.67 | |
Underlying(2) | 1.53 | | 1.54 | | 1.50 | | 1.45 | | 1.47 | | 1.44 | | 1.26 | | 1.31 | |
| Basic reported EPS ($) | | | | | | | | |
| Reported | 1.84 | | 1.74 | | 1.54 | | 1.60 | | 1.27 | | 1.28 | | 0.89 | | 0.67 | |
| Reported net income (loss) by segment - Common shareholders | | |
| Canada | 356 | | 393 | | 404 | | 405 | | 255 | | 387 | | 117 | | (42) | |
| U.S. | 85 | | 46 | | 157 | | 211 | | 88 | | (113) | | 118 | | 164 | |
| Asset Management | 140 | | 301 | | 221 | | 230 | | 267 | | 251 | | 223 | | 239 | |
| Asia | 446 | | 288 | | 143 | | 198 | | 132 | | 236 | | 126 | | 100 | |
| Corporate | 51 | | (9) | | (25) | | (107) | | 2 | | (11) | | (65) | | (70) | |
| Total reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 1,078 | | 1,019 | | 900 | | 937 | | 744 | | 750 | | 519 | | 391 | |
Less: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)(1) | 153 | | 231 | | 85 | | 380 | | (65) | | (49) | | (436) | | (166) | |
ACMA (pre-tax)(1) | (23) | | 93 | | 2 | | (6) | | (60) | | (91) | | 3 | | (66) | |
Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | 62 | | (184) | | (68) | | (148) | | (114) | | (46) | | (40) | | (41) | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | (12) | | (23) | | (2) | | (139) | | 121 | | 94 | | 253 | | (106) | |
Underlying net income (loss) by segment(2) | | | | | | | | |
Canada | 266 | | 290 | | 290 | | 285 | | 243 | | 293 | | 281 | | 256 | |
U.S. | 72 | | 110 | | 165 | | 171 | | 148 | | 136 | | 123 | | 161 | |
Asset Management | 382 | | 362 | | 311 | | 291 | | 333 | | 294 | | 259 | | 242 | |
Asia | 130 | | 145 | | 152 | | 159 | | 116 | | 164 | | 144 | | 155 | |
Corporate | 48 | | (5) | | (35) | | (56) | | 22 | | (45) | | (68) | | (44) | |
Total underlying net income (loss)(2) | 898 | | 902 | | 883 | | 850 | | 862 | | 842 | | 739 | | 770 | |
(1)Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment.
(2)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
(1)Experience-related items from our India, China and Malaysia joint ventures and associates are recorded within other experience.
86 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Third Quarter 2021
Q3'21 reported net income of $1,019 million increased $269 million or 36% compared to the same period in 2020, driven by favourable market-related impacts from changes in the fair value of investment properties, and ACMA, partially offset by a par allocation adjustment. Underlying net income of $902 million increased by $60 million or 7%, driven by business growth, favourable credit experience and higher tax-exempt investment income. This was partially offset by morbidity and expense experience, and the unfavourable impacts of foreign exchange translation. Mortality experience was elevated in the U.S. and Asia, but relatively in line with the prior year. During the third quarter of 2021, the impacts of foreign exchange translation led to a decline of $41 million in reported net income and $36 million in underlying net income.
Second Quarter 2021
Reported net income increased by $381 million in the second quarter of 2021 compared to the same period in 2020, driven by favourable market-related impacts, primarily from changes in interest rates. Underlying net income increased by $144 million or 19%, driven by business growth, a lower effective tax rate, and favourable credit experience. These factors were partially offset by the unfavourable impacts of foreign exchange translation, lower investing activity and unfavourable expense experience. During the second quarter of 2021, the impacts of foreign exchange translation decreased reported net income and underlying net income by $70 million and $75 million, respectively.
First Quarter 2021
Reported net income increased by $546 million in the first quarter of 2021 compared to the same period in 2020, driven by market-related impacts, reflecting favourable equity markets and interest rate changes, partially offset by unfavourable credit spread movements. This was partially offset by higher fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards and higher restructuring costs. An after-tax restructuring charge of $57 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2021 that related to our strategy for our workspace and redefining the role of the office. Underlying net income increased by $80 million or 10%, driven by business growth, favourable morbidity experience in the U.S. and favourable credit experience in Canada, partially offset by lower investing activity gains in Canada and the U.S. During the first quarter of 2021, the impacts of foreign exchange translation decreased reported net income and underlying net income by $33 million and $31 million, respectively.
Fourth Quarter 2020
Reported net income increased by $25 million or 3% in the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, driven by the change in underlying net income of $70 million, partially offset by unfavourable ACMA impacts in the U.S. and higher fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards. Underlying net income increased driven by business growth, favourable morbidity experience related to Canada and the U.S., partially offset by lower investing activity reflecting losses in Canada in the current quarter due to asset repositioning, lower AFS gains reflecting an impairment in Asia, and less favourable credit experience in Asia and the U.S. Across the Company, mortality experience was in line with the prior year, as unfavourable experience in Canada was offset by favourable experience in Corporate. Furthermore, in the U.S., the unfavourable impact of COVID-19 claims in 2020 was comparable to the impacts of large case claims in In-force Management in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Third Quarter 2020
Reported net income was $750 million in the third quarter of 2020, an increase of $69 million or 10% compared to the same period in 2019, driven by favourable market-related impacts and lower acquisition costs, partially offset by unfavourable ACMA and fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards. Favourable market-related impacts were predominantly driven by interest rates and the rise in equity markets, partially offset by changes in the fair value of investment properties. Underlying net income was $842 million in the third quarter of 2020, an increase of $33 million or 4%, compared to the same period in 2019, driven by business growth, favourable results in GB in Canada, favourable morbidity experience in the U.S., higher new business gains and higher investing activity, partially offset by tax matters that were favourable in the third quarter of 2019, unfavourable credit experience, lower net investment returns on surplus, unfavourable mortality experience and lower available-for-sale gains.
Second Quarter 2020
Reported net income decreased by $76 million or 13% in the second quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, reflecting unfavourable market-related impacts and impacts from fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payments, partially offset by ACMA. Unfavourable market-related impacts reflected interest rate impacts and changes in the fair value of investment properties, partially offset by equity market impacts. Underlying net income was in line with the same period in 2019, with positive impacts from business growth, investing activity, morbidity experience and higher net investment returns on surplus, largely offset by unfavourable tax impacts, credit experience and expense experience.
First Quarter 2020
Reported net income decreased by $232 million or 37% in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, reflecting unfavourable market-related and ACMA impacts and higher acquisition, integration and restructuring costs, partially offset by favourable fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards. Market-related impacts predominantly reflected the decline in equity markets, partially offset by the impact of credit spreads. Underlying net income increased by $53 million or 7%, driven by higher investing activity in Canada and the U.S., business growth, higher AFS gains, higher new business gains and improved credit experience compared to the first quarter of 2019. These were partially offset by lower net investment returns on surplus in Canada and Corporate, unfavourable expense and mortality experience, less favourable morbidity experience and unfavourable other experience.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 87
| | | | | |
| L. Non-IFRS Financial Measures | |
i.Underlying Net Income and Underlying EPS
Underlying net income (loss) and financial measures based on underlying net income (loss), including underlying EPS or underlying loss per share, and underlying ROE, are non-IFRS financial measures. Underlying net income (loss) removes from reported net income (loss) the impacts of the following items in our results under IFRS and when removed assist in explaining our results from period to period:
(a)market-related impacts that differ from our best estimate assumptions, which include: (i) impacts of returns in equity markets, net of hedging, for which our best estimate assumptions are approximately 2% per quarter. This also includes the impact of the basis risk inherent in our hedging program, which is the difference between the return on underlying funds of products that provide benefit guarantees and the return on the derivative assets used to hedge those benefit guarantees; (ii) the impacts of changes in interest rates in the reporting period and on the value of derivative instruments used in our hedging programs including changes in credit and swap spreads, and any changes to the assumed fixed income reinvestment rates in determining the actuarial liabilities; and (iii) the impacts of changes in the fair value of investment properties in the reporting period;
(b)assumption changes and management actions, which include: (i) the impacts of revisions to the methods and assumptions used in determining our liabilities for insurance contracts and investment contracts; and (ii) the impacts on insurance contracts and investment contracts of actions taken by management in the current reporting period, referred to as management actions which include, for example, changes in the prices of in-force products, new or revised reinsurance on in-force business, and material changes to investment policies for assets supporting our liabilities; and
(c)other adjustments:
i.certain hedges in Canada that do not qualify for hedge accounting - this adjustment enhances the comparability of our results from period to period, as it reduces volatility to the extent it will be offset over the duration of the hedges;
ii.fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards that are settled with MFS’s own shares and accounted for as liabilities and measured at fair value each reporting period until they are vested, exercised and repurchased - this adjustment enhances the comparability of MFS’s results with publicly traded asset managers in the United States;
iii.acquisition, integration and restructuring costs - this adjustment enhances comparability of our results from period to period, by removing the impacts of costs, including the unwinding of the discount for certain liabilities related to acquisitions, that are not ongoing in nature and are incurred with the intent to generate benefits in future periods; and
iv.other items that are unusual or exceptional in nature.
All factors discussed in this document that impact our underlying net income are also applicable to reported net income. All EPS measures in this document refer to fully diluted EPS, unless otherwise stated. As noted below, underlying EPS excludes the dilutive impacts of convertible instruments.
Underlying EPS (diluted). This measure is used in comparing the profitability across multiple periods and is calculated by dividing underlying net income by weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted EPS, excluding the dilutive impact of convertible instruments. For additional information about the underlying net income, see above. For additional information about the composition of the EPS, please refer to Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information about the SLEECS, please refer to Note 13 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
88 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The following table sets out the post-tax amounts that were excluded from our underlying net income (loss) and underlying EPS and provides a reconciliation to our reported net income (loss) and EPS based on IFRS.
Reconciliations of Select Net Income Measures
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| ($ millions, unless otherwise noted) | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders | | | | 3,934 | | 2,404 | |
| Market-related impacts | | | | | |
| Equity market impacts | | | | | |
| Impacts from equity market changes | | | | 278 | | (34) | |
| Basis risk impacts | | | | 24 | | (109) | |
| Equity market impacts | | | | 302 | | (143) | |
Interest rate impacts(1) | | | | | |
| Impacts of interest rate changes | | | | 74 | | (187) | |
| Impacts of credit spread movements | | | | (11) | | (35) | |
| Impacts of swap spread movements | | | | 8 | | 8 | |
| Interest rate impacts | | | | 71 | | (214) | |
| Impacts of changes in the fair value of investment properties | | | | 254 | | (104) | |
| Less: Market-related impacts | | | | 627 | | (461) | |
| Less: Assumption changes and management actions | | | | 74 | | (143) | |
| Other adjustments | | | | | |
| Fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards | | | | (186) | | (92) | |
Acquisition, integration and restructuring(2)(3)(7)(8) | | | | (18) | | (117) | |
Other(4)(5)(6) | | | | (96) | | 4 | |
| Less: Total of other adjustments | | | | (300) | | (205) | |
| Underlying net income | | | | 3,533 | | 3,213 | |
| Reported EPS (diluted) ($) | | | | 6.69 | | 4.10 | |
| Less: Market-related impacts ($) | | | | 1.06 | | (0.80) | |
| Assumption changes and management actions ($) | | | | 0.12 | | (0.24) | |
| Fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards ($) | | | | (0.32) | | (0.16) | |
| Acquisition, integration and restructuring ($) | | | | (0.03) | | (0.20) | |
| Other ($) | | | | (0.16) | | 0.01 | |
| Impact of convertible securities on diluted EPS ($) | | | | (0.01) | | — | |
| Underlying EPS (diluted) ($) | | | | 6.03 | | 5.49 | |
(1)Our exposure to interest rates varies by product type, line of business, and geography. Given the long-term nature of our business, we have a higher degree of sensitivity in respect of interest rates at long durations.
(2)Amounts relate to acquisition costs for the BGO acquisition, the InfraRed acquisition and the Crescent acquisition, which include the unwinding of the discount for Other financial liabilities of $59 million in 2021 ($47 million in 2020).
(3)The restructuring charge of $57 million in the first quarter of 2021 related to our strategy for our workspace and redefining the role of the office ($20 million in the fourth quarter of 2020), and of $57 million and $48 million in 2021 and 2020.
(4)Amount relates to an adjustment of investment income and expense allocations between participating policyholders and shareholders for prior years recorded in the third quarter of 2021.
(5)Amounts relate to the UK Finance Act that was signed into law on June 10, 2021, increasing the corporate tax rate from 19% to 25%, which will take effect for future tax periods beginning April 1, 2023. As a result, reported net income decreased by $11 million in the second quarter of 2021. See section C - Profitability - 5 - Income taxes in our Q2 2021 MD&A.
(6)Certain hedges in Canada that do not qualify for hedge accounting decreased reported net income by $5 million and $4 million for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2020, respectively.
(7)Reflects the changes in estimated future payments for acquisition-related contingent considerations and options to purchase remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates of $153 million in 2021.
(8)Reflects a realized gain of $297 million on the Initial Public Offering of Aditya Birla Sun Life Asset Management Company in the fourth quarter of 2021.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 89
The following table shows the pre-tax amount of underlying net income adjustments:
| | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions, unless otherwise noted) | 2021 | 2020 |
| Reported net income - Common shareholders (after-tax) | 3,934 | | 2,404 | |
| Underlying net income adjustments (pre-tax): | | |
| Less: Market-related impacts | 849 | | (716) | |
| Assumption changes and management actions | 66 | | (214) | |
| Other adjustments | (338) | | (241) | |
| Total underlying net income adjustments (pre-tax) | 577 | | (1,171) | |
| Less: Taxes related to underlying net income adjustments | (176) | | 362 | |
| Underlying net income (after-tax) | 3,533 | | 3,213 | |
Taxes related to underlying net income adjustments may vary from the expected effective tax rate range reflecting the mix of business based on the Company's international operations.
ii. Additional Non-IFRS Financial Measures
Management also uses the following non-IFRS financial measures:
After-tax profit margin for U.S. Group Benefits. This ratio expresses U.S. employee benefits and medical stop-loss underlying net income as a percentage of net premiums. It assists in explaining our results from period to period and measures profitability. This ratio is calculated by dividing underlying net income (loss) by net premiums for the trailing four quarters. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Assets under management. AUM is a non-IFRS financial measure that indicates the size of our company's asset management, wealth, and insurance assets. There is no standardized financial measure under IFRS. In addition to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, which are the balance of General funds and Segregated funds on our Statements of Financial Position, AUM also includes Other AUM, defined below.
Effective January 1, 2021, the methodology for AUM was updated for SLC Management with respect to certain real estate and investment-grade fixed income products to include uncalled capital commitments. We have updated prior period amounts to reflect this change.
Assumption changes and management actions. In this document the impacts of ACMA on shareholders' net income (after-tax) is included in reported net income and is excluded from underlying net income, as described in section D - Profitability in this document. See section D - Profitability - 2 - Assumption changes and management actions in this MD&A for details on ACMA.
Note 10.A of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2021 shows the pre-tax impacts of method and assumption changes on shareholders' and participating policyholders' insurance contract liabilities net of reinsurance assets, excluding changes in other policy liabilities and assets. The view in this document of ACMA is the impacts on shareholders' reported net income (after-tax). The Consolidated Financial Statements view is a component of the change in total company liabilities.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the differences between the two measures.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| ($ millions) | | | | 2021 | 2020 |
Impacts of method and assumption changes on insurance contract liabilities (pre-tax) | | | | (273) | | (116) | |
Less: Participating policyholders(1) | | | | (9) | | 54 | |
| Impacts of method and assumption changes excluding participating policyholders (pre-tax) | | | | (264) | | (170) | |
| Less: Tax | | | | (93) | | (64) | |
| Impacts of method and assumption changes excluding participating policyholders (after-tax) | | | | (171) | | (106) | |
Add: Management actions (after-tax)(2)(3) | | | | 247 | | (65) | |
Other (after-tax)(4) | | | | (2) | | 28 | |
Assumption changes and management actions (after-tax)(3)(5)(6) | | | | 74 | | (143) | |
(1)Adjustment to remove the pre-tax impacts of method and assumption changes on amounts attributed to participating policyholders.
(2)Adjustment to include the after-tax impacts of management actions on insurance contract liabilities and investment contract liabilities which include, for example, changes in the prices of in-force products, new or revised reinsurance on in-force business, and material changes to investment policies for assets supporting our liabilities. The pre-tax impact of management actions to Method and assumption changes on insurance contract liabilities was an increase of $331 million in 2021 (a decrease of $76 million in 2020).
(3)In the third quarter of 2020, ACMA included an after-tax loss of $10 million relating to the impact from the repayment of a senior financing obligation related to U.S. statutory regulatory capital requirements for In-force Management. The transaction mainly comprises of the benefit of an unwind fee of $15 million, more than offset by the net impact from the liquidation of the investment portfolio of $47 million. The latter included a loss on the termination of derivatives and realized AFS gains on the disposal of debt securities of $270 million and $223 million ($342 million and $282 million, on a pre-tax basis), respectively. See section K - Additional Financial Disclosure in our 2020 Annual MD&A.
(4)Adjustments to include the after-tax impacts of method and assumption changes on investment contracts and other policy liabilities, and the pre-tax impact to Method and assumption changes on insurance contract liabilities was a decrease of $2 million in 2021 (an increase of $35 million in 2020).
(5)Includes the tax impacts of ACMA on insurance contract liabilities and investment contract liabilities, reflecting the tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we do business.
(6)ACMA is included in reported net income and is excluded in calculating underlying net income, as described in section C - Profitability in our Q4 2021 MD&A.
90 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Cash and other liquid assets. This measure is comprised of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and publicly traded securities that are held at SLF Inc. (the ultimate parent company), and its wholly owned holding companies. This measure represents available funds for capital re-deployment to support business growth.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ millions) | As at December 31, 2021 | | As at December 31, 2020 |
| Cash and other liquid assets (held at SLF Inc. and its wholly owned holding companies): | | | |
| Cash, cash equivalents & short-term securities | 2,383 | | | 3,037 | |
Debt securities(1) | 1,421 | | | 18 | |
Equity securities(2) | 861 | | | — | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Cash and other liquid assets (held at SLF Inc. and its wholly owned holding companies) | 4,665 | | (3) | 3,055 | |
(1)Includes publicly traded bonds.
(2)Includes ETF Investments.
(3)Includes $2.0 billion of proceeds from the subordinated debt offerings completed in November 2021, of which $1.5 billion is subject to contractual terms requiring us to redeem the underlying securities, in full, if the closing of the DentaQuest acquisition does not occur. These amounts will not qualify as LICAT capital until the acquisition closes.
Constant currency. We remove the impacts of foreign exchange translation from certain IFRS and non-IFRS measures to assist in comparing our results from period to period. The impacts of foreign exchange translation is approximated by using the foreign exchange rates in effect during the comparative period, using the average or period end foreign exchange rates, as appropriate.
Earnings on Surplus. This component of the Sources of Earnings ("SOE") represents the net income earned on a company’s surplus funds. Earnings on Surplus is comprised of realized gains on available-for-sale assets, as well as net investment returns on surplus, such as investment income, gains (losses) on seed investments, investment properties mark-to-market, and interest on debt.
Expected profit. The portion of the consolidated pre-tax net income on business in-force at the start of the reporting period that was expected to be realized based on the achievement of the best estimate assumptions made at the beginning of the reporting period. Expected profit for asset management companies is set equal to their pre-tax net income.
Effective January 1, 2021, expected profit for U.S. group policies includes previously classified impact of new business, aligning group business sources of earnings reporting across business groups. We have updated prior period amounts to reflect this change.
Experience-related items attributable to reported net income and underlying net income. Pre-tax gains and losses that are due to differences between the actual experience during the reporting period and the best estimate assumptions at the start of the reporting period. Experience-related items are a part of the Sources of Earnings framework, and are calculated in accordance with OSFI Guideline D-9, Sources of Earnings Disclosures.
Financial leverage ratio. This total debt to total capital ratio is ratio of debt plus preferred shares to total capital, where debt consists of all capital qualifying debt securities. Capital qualifying debt securities consist of subordinated debt and innovative capital instruments. The ratio is an indicator of the Company's capital adequacy measured by its proportion of capital qualifying debt in accordance with OSFI guidelines.
Impacts of foreign exchange translation. To assist in comparing our results from period-to-period, the favourable or unfavourable impacts of foreign exchange translation are approximated using the foreign exchange rates, in effect during the comparative period, for several IFRS and Non-IFRS financial measures using the average or period end foreign exchange rates, as appropriate. Items impacting a reporting period, such as Revenue, Benefits and expenses, and Reported net income (loss) in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, as well as underlying net income (loss), and sales, are translated into Canadian dollars using average exchange rates for the appropriate daily, monthly, or quarterly period. For items as at a point in time, such as Assets and Liabilities in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, as well as the AUM and Expected profit component of our Sources of Earnings disclosure, period-end rates are used for currency translation purposes.
Impact of new business. The point-of-sale impact on pre-tax net income of writing new business during the reporting period. Issuing new business may produce a gain or loss at the point-of sale, primarily because valuation assumptions are different than pricing assumptions and/or actual acquisition expenses may differ from those assumed in pricing.
Other AUM. Other AUM is composed of mutual funds, managed funds, as well as general fund and segregated fund assets managed by our joint ventures. In Canada, other AUM includes Client assets in retail mutual fund products of Sun Life Global Investments. In Asia, other AUM includes Client assets in Hong Kong managed fund products, International Wealth products, Philippines mutual and managed fund products, Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited equity and fixed income mutual fund products, Sun Life Everbright Asset Management products and our joint ventures’ general fund and segregated fund assets based on our proportionate equity interest. In Asset Management, other AUM includes Client assets for retail and institutional Clients, as well as capital raising, such as uncalled commitments and fund leverage in SLC Management. There is no directly comparable IFRS financial measure.
Pre-tax net operating profit margin ratio for MFS. This ratio is a measure of the profitability of MFS, which excludes the impact of fair value adjustments on MFS's share-based payment awards, investment income, and certain commission expenses that are offsetting. These commission expenses are excluded in order to neutralize the impact these items have on the pre-tax net operating profit margin ratio and have no impact on the profitability of MFS. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Real estate market sensitivities. Real estate market sensitivities are non-IFRS financial measures for which there are no directly comparable measures under IFRS so it is not possible to provide a reconciliation of these amounts to the most directly comparable IFRS measures.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 91
Return on equity. IFRS does not prescribe the calculation of ROE and therefore a comparable measure under IFRS is not available. To determine reported ROE and underlying ROE, respectively, reported net income (loss) and underlying net income (loss) is divided by the total weighted average common shareholders’ equity for the period. The ROE provides an indication of the overall profitability of the Company. The quarterly ROE is annualized.
Sales. In Canada, insurance sales consist of sales of individual insurance and Sun Life Health products; wealth sales consist of sales of individual wealth products and sales in GRS. In the U.S., insurance sales consist of sales by Group Benefits. In Asia, insurance sales consist of the individual and group insurance sales by our subsidiaries and joint ventures and associates, based on our proportionate equity interest, in the Philippines, Indonesia, India, China, Malaysia, Vietnam, International, Hong Kong and Singapore; wealth sales consist of Hong Kong wealth sales, Philippines mutual fund sales, wealth sales by our India and China insurance joint ventures and associates, and Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited's equity and fixed income mutual fund sales based on our proportionate equity interest, including sales as reported by our bank distribution partners. Asset Management sales consist of gross flows for retail and institutional Clients; SLC Management gross flows include capital raising, such as uncalled capital commitments and fund leverage. To provide greater comparability across reporting periods, we exclude the impacts of foreign exchange translation from sales. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Effective January 1, 2021, the methodology for Assets Under Management was updated for SLC Management with respect to certain real estate and investment-grade fixed income products to add uncalled capital commitments not previously included. This will align SLC Management’s AUM with market conventions applied across asset classes. We have updated prior period amounts for all quarters of 2020 to reflect this change in methodology. Subsequent to the fourth quarter of 2020, increases and decreases in all capital raising, including uncalled capital commitments and fund leverage, for the aforementioned products are reflected in gross flows, outflows and net flows as applicable. Gross flows is a component of managed fund sales and total wealth sales. Client distributions from the sale of underlying assets in closed-end funds are no longer reported in net flows.
Sources of Earnings ("SOE"). The SOE is prepared in accordance with the OSFI Guideline D-9, Sources of Earnings Disclosures and is therefore not prescribed under IFRS. The preparation for the document and its components does not have a standard for preparation as it depends on the methodology, estimates, and assumptions used. The components of the SOE are: expected profit, impact of new business, experience gains and losses, management actions and changes in assumptions, and earnings on surplus. On a comparative period-over-period basis, this document refers to the change in expected profit as business growth.
Underlying dividend payout ratio. This is the ratio of dividends paid per share to diluted underlying EPS for the period. The ratio is utilized during the capital budgeting process to ensure that we are able to achieve our payout targets after factoring in our planned capital initiatives. We target an underlying dividend payout ratio of between 40% and 50% based on underlying EPS. For more information, see Section I - Capital and Liquidity Management in this document.
Underlying effective tax rate. This measure is calculated using the pre-tax underlying net income and the income tax expense associated with it, excluding amounts attributable to participating policyholders. Our statutory tax rate is normally reduced by various tax benefits, such as lower taxes on income subject to tax in foreign jurisdictions, a range of tax-exempt investment income, and other sustainable tax benefits. Our effective tax rate helps in the analysis of the income tax impacts in the period.
Value of New Business. VNB represents the present value of our best estimate of future distributable earnings, net of the cost of capital, from new business contracts written in a particular time period, except new business in our Asset Management pillar. The assumptions used in the calculations are generally consistent with those used in the valuation of our insurance contract liabilities except that discount rates used approximate theoretical return expectations of an equity investor. Capital required is based on the higher of Sun Life Assurance's LICAT operating target and local (country specific) operating target capital. VNB is a useful metric to evaluate the present value created from new business contracts. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Effective January 1, 2021, VNB reflects a change in the timing of recognition of U.S. group policies sold or renewed with an effective date of January 1, which will recognize VNB for these policies in the prior year rather than the first quarter, to align with the timing of U.S. renewals and reported insurance sales. We have updated prior period amounts to reflect this change.
92 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
iii.Reconciliations of Select Non-IFRS Financial Measures
Reported Net Income to Underlying Net Income Reconciliation - Pre-tax by Business Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Q4'21 |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | Canada | U.S. | Asset Management | Asia | Corporate | Total |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 356 | | 85 | | 140 | | 446 | | 51 | | 1,078 | |
Less: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)(1) | 71 | | 51 | | — | | 29 | | 2 | | 153 | |
ACMA (pre-tax)(1) | 2 | | (23) | | — | | (2) | | — | | (23) | |
Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | (3) | | (10) | | (278) | | 353 | | — | | 62 | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | 20 | | (5) | | 36 | | (64) | | 1 | | (12) | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 266 | | 72 | | 382 | | 130 | | 48 | | 898 | |
| Q4'20 |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 255 | | 88 | | 267 | | 132 | | 2 | | 744 | |
Less: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)(1) | (75) | | 2 | | — | | 3 | | 5 | | (65) | |
ACMA (pre-tax)(1) | (4) | | (76) | | — | | 21 | | (1) | | (60) | |
Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | — | | (1) | | (78) | | (8) | | (27) | | (114) | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | 91 | | 15 | | 12 | | — | | 3 | | 121 | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 243 | | 148 | | 333 | | 116 | | 22 | | 862 | |
(1) Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment.
(2) Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021 |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | Canada | U.S. | Asset Management | Asia | Corporate | Total |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 1,558 | | 499 | | 892 | | 1,075 | | (90) | | 3,934 | |
Less: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)(1) | 669 | | 117 | | — | | 67 | | (4) | | 849 | |
ACMA (pre-tax)(1) | 52 | | (126) | | — | | 135 | | 5 | | 66 | |
Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | (118) | | (14) | | (488) | | 352 | | (70) | | (338) | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | (176) | | 4 | | 34 | | (65) | | 27 | | (176) | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 1,131 | | 518 | | 1,346 | | 586 | | (48) | | 3,533 | |
| 2020 |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | Canada | U.S. | Asset Management | Asia | Corporate | Total |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 717 | | 257 | | 980 | | 594 | | (144) | | 2,404 | |
Less: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)(1) | (656) | | 10 | | — | | (77) | | 7 | | (716) | |
ACMA (pre-tax)(1) | 43 | | (397) | | — | | 99 | | 41 | | (214) | |
Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | 4 | | (6) | | (167) | | (8) | | (64) | | (241) | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | 253 | | 82 | | 19 | | 1 | | 7 | | 362 | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 1,073 | | 568 | | 1,128 | | 579 | | (135) | | 3,213 | |
(1) Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment.
(2) Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 93
Reported Net Income to Underlying Net Income Reconciliation - Pre-tax by Business Unit - Asset Management
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Q4'21 | Q4'20 | | | | |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | MFS | SLC Management | MFS | SLC Management | | | | |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 295 | | (155) | | 253 | | 14 | | | | | |
Less: Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | (53) | | (225) | | (52) | | (26) | | | | | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | 6 | | 30 | | 6 | | 6 | | | | | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 342 | | 40 | | 299 | | 34 | | | | | |
| 2021 | 2020 | | | | |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | MFS | SLC Management | MFS | SLC Management | | | | |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 1,049 | | (157) | | 942 | | 38 | | | | | |
Less: Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | (206) | | (282) | | (103) | | (64) | | | | | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | 20 | | 14 | | 11 | | 8 | | | | | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 1,235 | | 111 | | 1,034 | | 94 | | | | | |
(1) Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment.
(2) Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Reported Net Income to Underlying Net Income Reconciliation - Pre-tax in U.S. dollars
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Q4'21 | Q4'20 |
| (US$ millions) | U.S. | MFS | U.S. | MFS |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 68 | | 234 | | 66 | | 194 | |
Less: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)(1) | 42 | | — | | 1 | | — | |
ACMA (pre-tax)(1) | (19) | | — | | (58) | | — | |
Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | (8) | | (43) | | (1) | | (40) | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | (3) | | 5 | | 12 | | 4 | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 56 | | 272 | | 112 | | 230 | |
| (US$ millions) | 2021 | 2020 |
| Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders | 399 | | 836 | | 191 | | 704 | |
Less: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)(1) | 94 | | — | | 7 | | — | |
ACMA (pre-tax)(1) | (101) | | — | | (299) | | — | |
Other adjustments (pre-tax)(1) | (11) | | (165) | | (4) | | (78) | |
| Tax expense (benefit) on above items | 4 | | 16 | | 62 | | 8 | |
Underlying net income (loss)(2) | 413 | | 985 | | 425 | | 774 | |
(1) Represents an adjustment made to arrive at a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a breakdown of components within this adjustment.
(2) Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. See section L - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
| | | | | |
| M. Accounting and Control Matters |
1. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting and actuarial policies are described in Notes 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 11 and 20 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Management must make judgments involving assumptions and estimates, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain, under these policies. The estimates described below are considered particularly significant to understanding our financial performance. As part of our financial control and reporting, judgments involving assumptions and estimates are reviewed by the independent auditor and by other independent advisors on a periodic basis. Accounting policies requiring estimates are applied consistently in the determination of our financial results.
Benefits to Policyholders
General
The liabilities for insurance contracts represent the estimated amounts which, together with estimated future premiums and net investment income, will provide for outstanding claims, estimated future benefits, policyholders' dividends, taxes (other than income taxes), and expenses on in-force insurance contracts.
In determining our liabilities for insurance contracts, assumptions must be made about mortality and morbidity rates, lapse and other policyholder behaviour, interest rates, equity market performance, asset default, inflation, expenses, and other factors over the life of our products. Most of
94 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
these assumptions relate to events that are anticipated to occur many years in the future. Assumptions require significant judgment and regular review and, where appropriate, revision.
We use best estimate assumptions for expected future experience and apply margins for adverse deviations to provide for uncertainty in the choice of the best estimate assumptions. The amount of insurance contract liabilities related to the application of margins for adverse deviations to best estimate assumptions is called a provision for adverse deviations.
Best Estimate Assumptions
Best estimate assumptions are intended to be current, neutral estimates of the expected outcome as guided by Canadian actuarial standards of practice. The choice of best estimate assumptions takes into account current circumstances, past experience data (Company and/or industry), the relationship of past to expected future experience, anti-selection, the relationship among assumptions, and other relevant factors. For assumptions on economic matters, the assets supporting the liabilities and the expected policy for asset-liability management are relevant factors.
Margins for Adverse Deviations
The appropriate level of margin for adverse deviations on an assumption is guided by Canadian actuarial standards of practice. For most assumptions, the standard range of margins for adverse deviations is 5% to 20% of the best estimate assumption, and the actuary chooses from within that range based on a number of considerations related to the uncertainty in the determination of the best estimate assumption. The level of uncertainty, and hence the margin chosen, will vary by assumption and by line of business and other factors. Considerations that would tend to indicate a choice of margin at the high end of the range include:
•The statistical credibility of the Company's experience is too low to be the primary source of data for choosing the best estimate assumption.
•Future experience is difficult to estimate.
•The cohort of risks lacks homogeneity.
•Operational risks adversely impact the ability to estimate the best estimate assumption.
•Past experience may not be representative of future experience and the experience may deteriorate.
Provisions for adverse deviations in future interest rates are included by testing a number of scenarios of future interest rates, some of which are prescribed by Canadian actuarial standards of practice, and determining the liability based on the range of possible outcomes. A scenario of future interest rates includes, for each forecast period between the statement of financial position date and the last liability cash flow, interest rates for risk-free assets, premiums for asset default, rates of inflation, and an investment strategy consistent with the Company's investment policy. The starting point for all future interest rate scenarios is consistent with the current market environment. If few scenarios are tested, the liability would be at least as great as the largest of the outcomes. If many scenarios are tested, the liability would be within a range defined by the average of the outcomes that are above the 60th percentile of the range of outcomes and the corresponding average for the 80th percentile.
Provisions for adverse deviations in future equity returns are included by scenario testing or by applying margins for adverse deviations. In blocks of business where the valuation of liabilities uses scenario testing of future equity returns, the liability would be within a range defined by the average of the outcomes that are above the 60th percentile of the range of outcomes and the corresponding average for the 80th percentile. In blocks of business where the valuation of liabilities does not use scenario testing of future equity returns, the margin for adverse deviations on common share dividends is between 5% and 20%, and the margin for adverse deviations on capital gains would be 20% plus an assumption that those assets reduce in value by 20% to 50% at the time when the reduction is most adverse. A 30% reduction is appropriate for a diversified portfolio of North American common shares and, for other portfolios, the appropriate reduction depends on the volatility of the portfolio relative to a diversified portfolio of North American common shares.
In choosing margins, we ensure that, when taken one at a time, each margin is reasonable with respect to the underlying best estimate assumption and the extent of uncertainty present in making that assumption, and also that, in aggregate, the cumulative impact of the margins for adverse deviations is reasonable with respect to the total amount of our insurance contract liabilities. Our margins are generally stable over time and are generally only revised to reflect changes in the level of uncertainty in the best estimate assumptions. Our margins tend to be at the mid-range, with the higher range used where there is greater uncertainty. When considering the aggregate impact of margins, the actuary assesses the consistency of margins for each assumption across each block of business to ensure there is no double counting or omission and to avoid choosing margins that might be mutually exclusive. In particular, the actuary chooses similar margins for blocks of business with similar characteristics, and also chooses margins that are consistent with other assumptions, including assumptions about economic factors. The actuary is guided by Canadian actuarial standards of practice in making these professional judgments about the reasonableness of margins for adverse deviations.
The best estimate assumptions and margins for adverse deviations are reviewed at least annually and revisions are made when appropriate. The choice of assumptions underlying the valuation of insurance contract liabilities is subject to external actuarial peer review.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Significant factors affecting the determination of policyholders' benefits, the methodology by which they are determined, their significance to the Company's financial condition and results of operations are described below.
Non-fixed Income Market Movements
We are exposed to equity markets through our segregated fund products (including variable annuities) that provide guarantees linked to underlying fund performance and through insurance products where the insurance contract liabilities are supported by non-fixed income assets.
For segregated fund products (including variable annuities), we have implemented hedging programs involving the use of derivative instruments to mitigate a large portion of the equity market risk associated with the guarantees. The cost of these hedging programs is reflected in the liabilities. The equity market risk associated with anticipated future fee income is not hedged.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 95
The majority of non-fixed income assets that are designated as FVTPL support our participating and universal life products where investment returns are passed through to policyholders through routine changes in the amount of dividends declared or in the rate of interest credited. In these cases, changes in non-fixed income asset values are largely offset by changes in insurance contract liabilities.
Interest Rates
We generally maintain distinct asset portfolios for each major line of business. In the valuation of insurance contract liabilities, the future cash flows from insurance contracts and the assets that support them are projected under a number of interest rate scenarios, some of which are prescribed by Canadian actuarial standards of practice. Reinvestments and disinvestments take place according to the specifications of each scenario, and the liability is set based on the range of possible outcomes.
For certain products, including participating insurance and certain forms of universal life policies and annuities, policyholders share investment performance through routine changes in the amount of dividends declared or in the rate of interest credited. These products generally have minimum interest rate guarantees.
Hedging programs are in place to help mitigate the impact of interest rate movements.
Mortality
Mortality refers to the rates at which death occurs for defined groups of people. Life insurance mortality assumptions are generally based on the past five to ten years of experience. Our experience is combined with industry experience where our own experience is insufficient to be statistically valid. Assumed mortality rates for life insurance and annuity contracts include assumptions about future mortality improvement based on recent trends in population mortality and our outlook for future trends.
Morbidity
Morbidity refers to both the rates of accident or sickness and the rates of recovery therefrom. Most of our disability insurance is marketed on a group basis. We offer critical illness policies on an individual basis in Canada and Asia, long-term care on an individual basis in Canada, and medical stop-loss insurance is offered on a group basis in the U.S. In Canada, group morbidity assumptions are based on our five-year average experience, modified to reflect any emerging trend in recovery rates. For long-term care and critical illness insurance, assumptions are developed in collaboration with our reinsurers and are largely based on their experience. In the U.S., our experience is used for both medical stop-loss and disability assumptions, with some consideration of industry experience.
Policy Termination Rates
Policyholders may allow their policies to lapse prior to the end of the contractual coverage period by choosing not to continue to pay premiums or by surrendering their policy for the cash surrender value. Assumptions for lapse experience on life insurance are generally based on our five-year average experience. Lapse rates vary by plan, age at issue, method of premium payment, and policy duration.
Premium Payment Patterns
For universal life contracts, it is necessary to set assumptions about premium payment patterns. Studies prepared by industry or the actuarial profession are used for products where our experience is insufficient to be statistically valid. Premium payment patterns usually vary by plan, age at issue, method of premium payment, and policy duration.
Expense
Future policy-related expenses include the costs of premium collection, claims adjudication and processing, actuarial calculations, preparation and mailing of policy statements, and related indirect expenses and overhead. Expense assumptions are mainly based on our recent experience using an internal expense allocation methodology. Inflationary increases assumed in future expenses are consistent with the future interest rates used in scenario testing.
Asset Default
As required by Canadian actuarial standards of practice, insurance contract liabilities include a provision for possible future default of the assets supporting those liabilities. The amount of the provision for asset default included in the insurance contract liabilities is based on possible reductions in future investment yield that vary by factors such as type of asset, asset credit quality (rating), duration, and country of origin. The asset default assumptions are comprised of a best estimate plus a margin for adverse deviations, and are intended to provide for loss of both principal and income. Best estimate asset default assumptions by asset category and geography are derived from long-term studies of industry experience and the Company's experience. Margins for adverse deviation are chosen from the standard range (of 25% to 100%) as recommended by Canadian actuarial standards of practice based on the amount of uncertainty in the choice of best estimate assumption. The credit quality of an asset is based on external ratings if available (public bonds) and internal ratings if not (mortgages and loans). Any assets without ratings are treated as if they are rated below investment grade.
In contrast to asset impairment provisions and changes in FVTPL assets arising from impairments, both of which arise from known credit events, the asset default provision in the insurance contract liabilities covers losses related to possible future (unknown) credit events. Canadian actuarial standards of practice require the asset default provision to be determined taking into account known impairments that are recognized elsewhere on the statement of financial position. The asset default provision included in the insurance contract liabilities is reassessed each reporting period in light of impairments, changes in asset quality ratings, and other events that occurred during the period.
96 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Sensitivities to Best Estimate Assumptions
The sensitivities presented below are forward-looking statements. They include measures of our estimated shareholders' net income sensitivity to
changes in the best estimate assumptions in our insurance contract liabilities based on a starting point and business mix as at December 31, 2021 and as at December 31, 2020, reflecting the update of actuarial method and assumption changes described in this MD&A under the heading Assumption Changes and Management Actions and, where appropriate, taking into account hedging programs in place as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 described in this MD&A under the heading Market Risk. These sensitivities represent the Company's estimate of changes in best estimate assumptions that are reasonably likely based on the Company's and/or the industry's historical experience and industry standards and best practices as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Changes to the starting point for interest rates, equity market prices and business mix will result in different estimated sensitivities. Additional information regarding equity and interest rate sensitivities, including key assumptions, can be found under the heading J - Risk Management - 9 - Risk Categories - Market Risk Sensitivities in this document.
The following table sets out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our common shareholders' net income attributable to certain changes in best estimate assumptions as at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Critical Accounting Estimate | Sensitivity | 2021 | | 2020 | |
| ($ millions, after-tax) | | | |
| Mortality | 2% increase in the best estimate assumption for insurance products | (25) | | (25) | |
| 2% decrease in the best estimate assumption for annuity products | (150) | | (150) | |
| Morbidity | 5% adverse change in the best estimate assumption | (255) | | (250) | |
| Policy Termination Rates | 10% decrease in the termination rate - where fewer terminations would be financially adverse | (270) | | (295) | |
| 10% increase in the termination rate - where more terminations would be financially adverse | (225) | | (200) | |
| Operating Expenses and Inflation | 5% increase in unit maintenance expenses | (165) | | (175) | |
| Real Estate | 1% reduction in assumed future real estate returns | (505) | | (495) | |
| Equities | 1% reduction in assumed future equity returns | (215) | | (235) | |
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
Debt securities, equity securities and certain other invested assets are designated as FVTPL or AFS and are recorded at fair value in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Changes in fair value of assets designated as FVTPL, and realized gains and losses on sale of FVTPL assets are recorded in income. Changes in fair value of AFS assets are recorded in OCI. For foreign currency translation, exchange differences calculated on the amortized cost of AFS debt securities are recognized in income and other changes in carrying amount are recognized in OCI. The exchange differences from the translation of AFS equity securities and other invested assets are recognized in OCI. Net impairment losses and realized gains and losses on sale of AFS assets are reclassified from OCI to income.
The fair value of government and corporate debt securities is determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar securities. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value is determined using market standard valuation methodologies, which include discounted cash flow analysis, consensus pricing from various broker dealers that are typically the market makers, or other similar techniques. The assumptions and valuation inputs in applying these market standard valuation methodologies are determined primarily using observable market inputs, which include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades of identical or similar instruments, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, bid prices, and reference data including market research publications. In limited circumstances, non-binding broker quotes are used.
The fair value of asset-backed securities is determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar securities, when available, or valuation methodologies and valuation inputs similar to those used for government and corporate debt securities. Additional valuation inputs include structural characteristics of the securities, and the underlying collateral performance, such as prepayment speeds and delinquencies. Expected prepayment speeds are based primarily on those previously experienced in the market at projected future interest rate levels. In instances where there is a lack of sufficient observable market data to value the securities, non-binding broker quotes are used.
The fair value of equity securities is determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical securities or similar securities. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value is determined using equity valuation models, which include discounted cash flow analysis and other techniques that involve benchmark comparison. Valuation inputs primarily include projected future operating cash flows and earnings, dividends, market discount rates, and earnings multiples of comparable companies.
Mortgages and loans are generally carried at amortized cost. The fair value of mortgages and loans, for disclosure purposes, is determined by discounting the expected future cash flows using a current market interest rate applicable to financial instruments with a similar yield, credit quality and maturity characteristics. Valuation inputs typically include benchmark yields and risk-adjusted spreads from current lending activities or loan issuances. The risk-adjusted spreads are determined based on the borrower's credit and liquidity, as well as term and other loan-specific features. Long-term mortgages and loans are generally categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The significant unobservable input is a portion of these risk adjusted spreads at or beyond the 20 year point for mortgages and at or beyond the 10 year point for loans.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 97
The fair value of other financial liabilities is determined by using the discounted cash flow methodology at the incremental borrowing rate or the effective interest rate. Other financial liabilities categorized as Level 3 represent the present value of the estimated price we would pay to acquire any remaining outstanding shares upon exercise of a put option and any mandatory income distributions. The fair value of the liabilities is based on the average earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") for the preceding years before the options’ exercise dates and EBITDA multiples in accordance with the put agreements as well as the expected amount of any mandatory income distributions. A change in EBITDA would impact the fair value of other financial liabilities and our net income (loss).
Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in income unless the derivative is part of a qualifying hedging relationship for accounting purposes. The fair value of derivative financial instruments depends upon derivative types. The fair value of exchange-traded futures and options is determined using quoted prices in active markets, while the fair value of OTC derivatives is determined using pricing models, such as discounted cash flow analysis or other market standard valuation techniques, with primarily observable market inputs.
Valuation inputs used to price OTC derivatives may include swap interest rate curves, foreign exchange spot and forward rates, index prices, the value of underlying securities, projected dividends, volatility surfaces, and in limited circumstances, counterparty quotes.
The fair value of OTC derivative financial instruments also includes credit valuation adjustments to reflect the credit risk of both the derivative counterparty and ourselves as well as the impact of contractual factors designed to reduce our credit exposure, such as collateral and legal rights of offset under master netting agreements. Inputs into determining the appropriate credit valuation adjustments are typically obtained from publicly available information and include credit default swap spreads when available, credit spreads derived from specific bond yields, or published cumulative default experience data adjusted for current trends when credit default swap spreads are not available.
The fair value of other invested assets is determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical securities or similar securities. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value is determined using equity valuation models, which include discounted cash flow analysis and other techniques that involve benchmark comparison. Valuation inputs primarily include projected future operating cash flows and earnings, dividends, market discount rates, and earnings multiples of comparable companies.
Investment properties are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in income. The fair value of investment properties is generally determined using property valuation models that are based on expected capitalization rates and models that discount expected future net cash flows at current market interest rates reflective of the characteristics, location, and market of each property. Expected future net cash flows include contractual and projected cash flows and forecasted operating expenses, and take into account interest, rental and occupancy rates derived from market surveys. The estimates of future cash inflows, in addition to expected rental income from current leases, include projected income from future leases based on significant assumptions that are consistent with current market conditions. The future rental rates are estimated based on the location, type and quality of the properties, and take into account market data and projections at the valuation date. The fair values are typically compared to market-based information for reasonability, including recent transactions involving comparable assets. The methodologies and inputs used in these models are in accordance with real estate industry valuation standards. Valuations are prepared externally or internally by professionally accredited real estate appraisers.
The fair value of short-term securities is approximated by their carrying amount adjusted for credit risk where appropriate.
Due to their nature, the fair value of policy loans and cash are assumed to be equal to their carrying values, which is the amount these assets are recorded at in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
Investments for accounts of segregated fund holders are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in net realized and unrealized gains (losses) within the segregated fund and are not recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of investments for accounts of segregated fund holders is determined using quoted prices in active markets or independent valuation information provided by investment managers. The fair value of direct investments within investments for accounts of segregated fund holders, such as short-term securities and government and corporate debt securities, is determined according to valuation methodologies and inputs described above in the respective asset type sections. The fair value of the secured borrowings from mortgage securitization is based on the methodologies and assumptions as described above for asset-backed securities.
The methodologies and assumptions for determining the fair values of investment contract liabilities are included in Note 10.B of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
We categorize our assets and liabilities carried at fair value, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as follows:
Level 1: Fair value is based on the unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. The types of assets and liabilities classified as Level 1 generally include cash and cash equivalents, certain U.S. government and agency securities, exchange-traded equity securities, and certain segregated and mutual fund units held for account of segregated fund holders.
Level 2: Fair value is based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities traded in active markets, or prices from valuation techniques that use significant observable inputs, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data through correlation or other means. The types of assets and liabilities classified as Level 2 generally include Canadian federal, provincial and municipal government, other foreign government and corporate debt securities, certain asset-backed securities, OTC derivatives, and certain segregated and mutual fund units held for account of segregated fund holders.
Level 3: Fair value is based on valuation techniques that require one or more significant inputs that are not based on observable market inputs. These unobservable inputs reflect our expectations about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The types of assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 generally include certain corporate bonds, certain other invested assets, and investment properties.
As pricing inputs become more or less observable, assets are transferred between levels in the hierarchy. Total gains and losses in income and OCI are calculated assuming transfers into or out of Level 3 occur at the beginning of the period. For a financial instrument that transfers into Level 3
98 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
during the reporting period, the entire change in fair value for the period is included in the Level 3 reconciliation schedule in Note 5 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. For transfers out of Level 3 during the reporting period, the change in fair value for the period is excluded from the Level 3 reconciliation schedule in Note 5 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Transfers into Level 3 occur when the inputs used to price the financial instrument lack observable market data and as a result, no longer meet the Level 1 or 2 criteria at the reporting date. Transfers out of Level 3 occur when the pricing inputs become more transparent and satisfy the Level 1 or 2 criteria at the reporting date.
Transfers into and out of Level 3 for financial assets were $nil and $140 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, respectively, compared to $5 million and $89 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020. The total amount of the net realized/unrealized gains (losses) related to financial instruments transferred out of Level 3 during the period, which were excluded from the Level 3 reconciliation, was a gain of $1 million as at December 31, 2021 compared to a loss of $5 million as at December 31, 2020.
Additional information on the fair value measurement of investments can be found in Note 5 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impairment
Management assesses debt and equity securities, mortgages and loans and other invested assets for objective evidence of impairment at each reporting date. Financial assets are impaired and impairment losses are incurred if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more loss events that have an impact on the estimated future cash flows that can be reliably estimated. Objective evidence of impairment generally includes significant financial difficulty of the issuer, including actual or anticipated bankruptcy or defaults and delinquency in payments of interest or principal or disappearance of an active market for the financial assets. All equity instruments in an unrealized loss position are reviewed to determine if objective evidence of impairment exists. Objective evidence of impairment for an investment in an equity instrument or other invested asset also includes, but is not limited to, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including information about significant changes with adverse effects that have taken place in the technological, market, economic or legal environment in which the issuer operates, and a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of an equity instrument or other invested asset below its cost.
Additional information on the impairment of financial assets can be found in Notes 1 and 10 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets of the acquired businesses. Goodwill is carried at original cost less any impairment subsequently incurred. Goodwill is assessed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances occur that may result in the recoverable amount of a cash generating unit ("CGU") falling below its carrying value. A CGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of cash inflows from other groups of assets. The goodwill balances are allocated to either individual or groups of CGUs that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination. Goodwill impairment is quantified by comparing a CGU's or a group of CGU's carrying value to its recoverable amount, which is the higher of fair value less cost to sell and value in use. Impairment losses are recognized immediately and cannot be reversed in future periods.
No impairment charges were recognized in 2021. We had a carrying value of $6,517 million in goodwill as at December 31, 2021. Additional information on goodwill can be found in Note 9 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of finite life and indefinite life intangible assets. Finite life intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis or using a units-of-production method, over the useful economic lives which are varying periods of up to 40 years. Amortization is charged through operating expenses. The useful lives of finite life intangible assets are reviewed annually, and the amortization is adjusted as necessary. Indefinite life intangibles are not amortized, and are assessed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. Impairment is assessed by comparing the carrying values of the indefinite life intangible assets to their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. If the carrying values of the indefinite life intangibles exceed their recoverable amounts, these assets are considered impaired, and a charge for impairment is recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The recoverable amount of intangible assets is determined using various valuation models, which require management to make certain judgments and assumptions that could affect the estimates of the recoverable amount. Impairment charges on intangible assets of $9 million were recognized in 2021 and there were impairment charges of $11 million in 2020.
As at December 31, 2021, our finite life intangible assets had a carrying value of $2.3 billion, which reflected the value of the field force, asset administration contracts, and Client relationships acquired as part of the Clarica, CMG Asia, Genworth EBG, Ryan Labs, Prime Advisors, Bentall Kennedy, and the U.S. employee benefits business acquisitions, the ACB bancassurance partnership, and Crescent, as well as software costs. Our indefinite life intangible assets had a carrying value of $1.1 billion as at December 31, 2021. The value of the indefinite life intangible assets reflected fund management contracts of MFS, BGO, InfraRed and Crescent.
Income Taxes
Income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. Deferred income tax is provided using the liability method. Our provision for income taxes is calculated based on the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the end of the reporting period.
As a multinational organization, we are subject to taxation in numerous jurisdictions. We seek to operate in a tax efficient manner while ensuring that we are in compliance with all laws and regulations. The determination of the required provision for current and deferred income taxes requires that we interpret tax legislation in the jurisdictions in which we operate and that we make assumptions about the expected timing of realization of deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Tax laws are complex and their interpretation requires significant judgment. The provision for income taxes reflects management's interpretation of the relevant tax laws and its best estimate of the income tax implications of the transactions and events during the period. We believe that our provisions for uncertain tax positions appropriately reflect the risk of tax positions that are under
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 99
audit, dispute or appeal with tax authorities, or which are otherwise considered to involve uncertainty. The adequacy of our tax provision is reviewed at the end of each reporting period. To the extent that our interpretations differ from those of tax authorities or the timing of realization is not as expected, the provision for income taxes may increase or decrease in future periods to reflect actual experience. The amount of any increase or decrease cannot be reasonably estimated.
Deferred income tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax losses and unused tax credits to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences, unused tax losses and unused tax credits can be utilized. At each reporting period, we assess all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine the amount of deferred income tax assets to be recorded. If it is probable that the benefit of tax losses and tax deductions will not be realized, a deferred income tax asset is not recognized. The assessment requires significant estimates and judgment about future events based on the information available at the reporting date.
From time to time, local governments, in countries in which we operate, enact changes to statutory corporate income tax rates. These changes require us to review and re-measure our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the date of enactment. As at December 31, 2021, our net deferred tax asset in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position was $1,526 million, primarily in Canada. Any future tax rate reductions in jurisdictions where we carry a net deferred tax asset, could result in a reduction in the carrying value of the deferred tax asset and a corresponding income tax expense at the time of substantial enactment of a rate reduction.
Pension Plans and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans for eligible employees. All of our material defined benefit plans worldwide are closed to new entrants with new hires participating in defined contribution plans. Our defined benefit pension plans offer benefits based on length of service and final average earnings and certain plans offer some indexation of benefits. We maintain certain supplementary non-contributory defined benefit pension arrangements for eligible employees, which are primarily for benefits which are in excess of local tax limits. In addition to these plans, in some countries the Company sponsors certain post-retirement benefit plans (for medical, dental and/or life insurance benefits) for eligible qualifying employees and their dependents who meet certain requirements.
In Canada, since January 1, 2009, all new employees participate in a defined contribution plan, while existing employees continue to accrue future benefits in the prior plan which provides a defined benefit plan and an optional contributory defined contribution plan.
With the closure of the Canadian defined benefit plans to new entrants, the volatility associated with future service accruals for active members has been limited and will decline over time. As at December 31, 2021, there are no active members in the UK and no active employees accruing future service benefits in the U.S. defined benefit plans.
The major risks remaining in relation to past service obligations are increases in liabilities due to a decline in discount rates, greater life expectancy than assumed and adverse asset returns. We have significantly de-risked the investments of our material defined benefit pension plans Company-wide by systematically shifting the pension asset mix towards liability matching investments. The target for our significant plans is to minimize volatility in funded status arising from changes in discount rates and exposure to equity markets.
Due to the long-term nature of these defined benefit plans, the calculation of benefit expenses and accrued benefit obligations depends on various assumptions, including discount rates, rates of compensation increases, health care cost trend rates, retirement ages, mortality rates and termination rates. Based upon consultation with external pension actuaries, management determines the assumptions used for these plans on an annual basis. The discount rate used for our material defined benefit plans is determined with reference to market yields of high-quality corporate bonds that are denominated in the same currency in which the benefits will be paid, and that have terms to maturity approximating the terms of obligations.
Actual experience may differ from that assumed, which would impact the valuation of defined benefit plans and the level of benefit expenses recognized in future years. Details of our pension and post-retirement benefit plans and the key assumptions used for the valuation these plans are included in Note 25 of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. Changes in Accounting Policies
We have included in this section a summary of changes in accounting policies. Where there are references to Notes, these are part of our 2021 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
2.A New and Amended International Financial Reporting Standards Adopted in 2021
We adopted the following amendments on January 1, 2021:
In August 2020, the IASB issued the Interest Rate Benchmark Reform Phase 2, which includes amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16 Leases (“IFRS 16”). The amendments address issues that arise from the implementation of the reforms, including the replacement of one benchmark with an alternative one. The adoption of these amendments did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The UK, Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced on March 5, 2021 that panel bank submissions for UK London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) will cease after December 31, 2021 and for key U.S. LIBOR tenors, after June 30, 2023. Additionally, the Canadian Alternative Reference Rate (“CARR”) working group has recommended on December 16, 2021 that the administrator of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”), Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited (“RBSL”), cease publication of all of CDOR’s remaining tenors after the end of June 2024. However, this is a recommendation only and the decision to cease CDOR ultimately lies solely with RBSL.
100 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
We have created an Interbank Offered Rate ("IBOR") Transition Program (“the Program”) to manage the transition to Alternative Reference Rates ("ARR"). The Program is cross-functional in nature and comprises key stakeholders across our organization and operates with executive oversight. The Program is on track in executing its transition plan, and is mindful of incorporating market developments as they arise. We also actively participate in industry associations and incorporate best practice guidance from these industry associations, as well as regulatory bodies into the transition plan, such as reviewing all existing and new U.S. LIBOR contracts for appropriate fallback language in contracts.
Areas of risk relating to the replacement of IBOR include the negotiations with borrowers, updating systems and processes which capture IBOR referenced contracts, amendments to those contracts, or existing fallback/transition clauses not operating as anticipated. Other transition risks that may arise because of the new ARRs are predominantly limited to interest rate risk and the risk of losing value or return on existing instruments. In 2020, all our entities exposed to U.S. LIBOR adhered to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association IBOR Fallbacks Protocol facilitating the transition of legacy derivative contracts. Our entities are also fully ready for the cessation of the publication of GBP LIBOR, having addressed the transition of all exposures as at December 31, 2021.
Our exposure to interest rate benchmarks subject to IBOR reforms is predominately related to U.S. LIBOR. As at December 31, 2021, non-derivative financial assets of $3,849, non-derivative financial liabilities of $70, and derivative notional of $9,417 have not yet transitioned to an ARR and excludes financial instruments maturing by June 30, 2023.
We adopted the following amendment on April 1, 2021:
In March 2021, the IASB issued the COVID-19-Related Rent Concessions beyond 30 June 2021 amendment to IFRS 16. The amendment extends the application period of the practical expedient in IFRS 16 to help lessees account for COVID-19-related rent concessions by one year. The original amendment was issued in May 2020 by adding a practical expedient to provide relief for lessees from lease modification accounting for COVID-19-related rent concessions, such as rent holidays and temporary rent reductions. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
2.B New and Amended International Financial Reporting Standards to be Adopted in 2022
The following new and amended IFRS were issued by the IASB and are expected to be adopted by us in 2022. We do not expect the adoption of these amendments to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements:
In May 2020, the IASB issued Reference to the Conceptual Framework, which includes amendments to IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The amendments update an outdated reference to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS 3 without significantly changing the requirements in the standard.
In May 2020, the IASB issued Property, Plant and Equipment - Proceeds before Intended Use, which includes amendments to IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment. The amendments prohibit deducting from the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment any proceeds from selling items produced while bringing that asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. The amendments apply retrospectively to assets ready for use in the comparative period.
In May 2020, the IASB issued Onerous Contracts - Cost of Fulfilling a Contract, which includes amendments to IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. The amendments specify that the 'cost of fulfilling' a contract comprises the 'costs that relate directly to the contract'. Costs that relate directly to a contract can either be incremental costs of fulfilling that contract or an allocation of other costs that relate directly to fulfilling contracts.
In May 2020, the IASB issued Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018-2020, which includes minor amendments to three IFRS standards applicable to our Consolidated Financial Statements. The amendments apply prospectively.
2.C Amended International Financial Reporting Standards to be Adopted in 2023 or Later
We are currently assessing the impact that these amendments will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements:
In May 2021, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 12 Income Taxes (“IAS 12”). The amendments, Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction, narrow the scope of the recognition exemption in IAS 12 so that it no longer applies to transactions that, on initial recognition, give rise to equal taxable and deductible temporary differences. The amendment to IAS 12 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023, with early application permitted.
In February 2021, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (“IAS 1”) and IFRS Practice Statement 2 Making Materiality Judgments (“IFRS Practice Statement 2”). The amendments to IAS 1 require companies to disclose their material accounting policy information rather than their significant accounting policies. The amendments to IFRS Practice Statement 2 provide guidance on how to apply the concept of materiality to accounting policy disclosures. The amendment to IAS 1 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023, with early application permitted.
In February 2021, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors (“IAS 8”). The amendments clarify how companies should distinguish changes in accounting policies from changes in accounting estimates. The amendment to IAS 8 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023, with early application permitted.
In May 2017, the IASB issued IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts ("IFRS 17"), which replaces IFRS 4. In June 2020, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 17, which include deferral of the effective date to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023. The deferral option of IFRS 9 for insurers was also extended to that same date. In December 2021, the IASB issued an optional amendment for a new transition option relating to comparative information about financial assets presented on initial application of IFRS 17. IFRS 17 establishes the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of insurance contracts. IFRS 17 requires entities to measure insurance contract liabilities at their current fulfillment values using one of three measurement models, depending on the nature of the contract. IFRS 17 is to be applied retrospectively to each group of
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 101
insurance contracts unless impracticable. If, and only if, it is impracticable to apply IFRS 17 retrospectively for a group of insurance contracts, an entity shall apply IFRS 17 using a modified retrospective approach or a fair value approach. IFRS 17 will affect how we account for our insurance contracts and how we report our financial performance in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. We are currently assessing the impact of IFRS 17. We anticipate it will have an impact on the timing of earnings recognition and the presentation and disclosure of financial results in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2014, the IASB issued the final version of IFRS 9, which replaces IAS 39. IFRS 9 includes guidance on the classification and measurement
of financial instruments, impairment of financial assets, and hedge accounting. Financial asset classification is based on the cash flow characteristics and the business model in which an asset is held. The classification determines how a financial instrument is accounted for and measured. IFRS 9 also introduces an impairment model for financial instruments not measured at fair value through profit or loss that requires recognition of expected losses at initial recognition of a financial instrument and the recognition of full lifetime expected losses if certain criteria are met. In addition, a new model for hedge accounting was introduced to achieve better alignment with risk management activities. This standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. In October 2017, the IASB issued narrow-scope amendments to IFRS 9. The amendments clarify the classification of certain prepayable financial assets and the accounting of financial liabilities following modification. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. However, pursuant to the aforementioned amendments to IFRS 4, we elected the deferral approach permitted under IFRS 4 to continue to apply IAS 39. We are currently assessing the impact that IFRS 9, along with these amendments, will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
3. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that all relevant information is gathered and reported to senior management, including the Company's President and CEO, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), and Executive Vice-President, Chief Legal Officer and Public Affairs, on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding public disclosure.
An evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under rules adopted by the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and the SEC, as at December 31, 2021, was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of the Company's management, including the CEO and the CFO. Based on our evaluation, the CEO and the CFO concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at December 31, 2021.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with IFRS.
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2021, based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021.
Our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2021, has been audited by the Company's external auditor, Deloitte LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, who also audited our Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2021. As stated in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, they have expressed an unqualified opinion on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting for the period which began on January 1, 2021 and ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
| | | | | |
| N. Legal and Regulatory Proceedings | |
Information concerning legal and regulatory matters is provided in our Annual Consolidated Financial Statements, our annual MD&A, and the AIF, in each case for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Sun Life is subject to regulation and supervision by government authorities in the jurisdictions in which it does business. Various regulators have introduced new measures or adjustments to respond to the evolving situation with the COVID-19 pandemic. OSFI, which supervises the activities of Sun Life, has announced various measures to support the resilience of the financial institutions that it regulates. On March 13, 2020, OSFI set an expectation for all federally regulated financial institutions that dividend increases and share buybacks should be halted for the time being. On November 4, 2021, OSFI lifted this restriction on the basis that these restrictions were no longer considered necessary. On April 9, 2020, OSFI announced a smoothing mechanism to LICAT interest rate risk requirements to reduce increased and unwarranted volatility in required capital. In the U.S., the National Association of Insurance Commissioners issued guidance to U.S. insurers on March 27, 2020 encouraging insurers to work with borrowers who may be unable to meet obligations because of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and on April 15, 2020 adopted interpretations of statutory accounting principles applicable to U.S. insurers related to, among other things, direct mortgage loans and Schedule BA mortgages. This guidance has been extended through December 31, 2021.
102 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
| | | | | |
| O. Forward-looking Statements | |
From time to time, the Company makes written or oral forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, including the “safe harbour” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements contained in this document include statements (i) relating to our strategies, (ii) relating to the increase in our medium-term financial objectives for underlying return on equity; (iii) relating to our sustainability plan commitments; (iv) relating to our intention to acquire DentaQuest; (v) relating to the expected impact of the transaction on our U.S. employee benefits revenues and mix of our U.S. product and service offerings; (vi) relating to our intention to sell our Canadian sponsored markets business to Canadian Premier; (vi) relating to our growth initiatives and other business objectives; (viii) relating to the plans we have implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic conditions and their impact on the Company; (ix) relating to our expected tax range for future years; (x) set out in this document under the heading H - Risk Management - Market Risk Sensitivities - Interest Rate Sensitivities, (xi) that are predictive in nature or that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions; and (xii) that include words such as “achieve”, “aim”, “ambition”, “anticipate”, “aspiration”, “assumption”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “goal”, “initiatives”, “intend”, “may”, “objective”, “outlook”, “plan”, “project”, “seek”, “should”, “strategy”, “strive”, “target”, “will”, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations. These statements represent our current expectations, estimates, and projections regarding future events and are not historical facts, and remain subject to change, particularly in light of the ongoing and developing COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the global economy and its uncertain impact on our business.
Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Future results and shareholder value may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, among other factors, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic conditions on our operations, liquidity, financial conditions or results and the matters set out in the Q4 2021 MD&A under the headings D - Profitability - 5 - Income taxes, F - Financial Strength and J - Risk Management and in SLF Inc.’s 2021 AIF under the heading Risk Factors, and the factors detailed in SLF Inc.’s other filings with Canadian and U.S. securities regulators, which are available for review at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively.
Medium-Term Financial Objectives
The Company's medium-term financial objectives set out in B - Overview - 2 - Financial Objectives are forward-looking non-IFRS financial measures. Our ability to achieve those objectives is dependent on our success in achieving growth initiatives and business objectives and on certain key assumptions that include: (i) no significant changes in the level of interest rates; (ii) average total equity market return of approximately 8-10% per annum; (iii) credit experience in line with best estimate actuarial assumptions; (iv) no significant changes in the level of our regulatory capital requirements; (v) no significant changes to our effective tax rate; (vi) no significant increase in the number of shares outstanding; (vii) other key assumptions include: no material changes to our hedging program, hedging costs that are consistent with our best estimate assumptions, no material assumption changes including updates to the economic scenario generator and no material accounting standard changes; and (viii) our best estimate actuarial assumptions used in determining our insurance and investment contract liabilities. Our underlying ROE is dependent upon capital levels and options for deployment of excess capital. Our medium-term financial objectives do not reflect the indirect effects of interest rate and equity market movements including the potential impacts on goodwill or the current valuation allowance on deferred tax assets as well as other items that may be non-operational in nature.
Our target dividend payout ratio of 40%-50% of our underlying net income assumes that economic conditions and our results will enable us to maintain our payout ratio in the target range, while maintaining a strong capital position. The declaration, amount and payment of dividends is subject to the approval of SLF Inc.'s Board of Directors and our compliance with the capital requirements in the Insurance Companies Act (Canada). Additional information on dividends is provided in the section I - Capital and Liquidity Management - 3 - Shareholder Dividends in this MD&A.
Although considered reasonable by the Company, we may not be able to achieve our medium-term financial objectives as the assumptions on which these objectives were based may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual results could differ materially from our medium-term financial objectives as described in the section B - Overview - 2 - Financial Objectives in this MD&A. Our medium-term financial objectives do not constitute guidance.
Risk Factors
Important risk factors that could cause our assumptions and estimates, and expectations and projections to be inaccurate and our actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this document, are set out below. The realization of our forward-looking statements, essentially depends on our business performance which, in turn, is subject to many risks, which have been further heightened with the current COVID-19 pandemic given the uncertainty of its duration and impact. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations include, but are not limited to: market risks - related to the performance of equity markets; changes or volatility in interest rates or credit spreads or swap spreads; real estate investments; and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; insurance risks - related to policyholder behaviour; mortality experience, morbidity experience and longevity; product design and pricing; the impact of higher-than-expected future expenses; and the availability, cost and effectiveness of reinsurance; credit risks - related to issuers of securities held in our investment portfolio, debtors, structured securities, reinsurers, counterparties, other financial institutions and other entities; business and strategic risks - related to global economic and political conditions; the design and implementation of business strategies; changes in distribution channels or Client behaviour including risks relating to market conduct by intermediaries and agents; the impact of competition; the performance of our investments and investment portfolios managed for Clients such as segregated and mutual funds; changes in the legal or regulatory environment, including capital requirements and tax laws; the environment, environmental laws and regulations; operational risks - related to breaches or failure of information system security and privacy, including cyber-attacks; our ability to attract and retain employees; legal, regulatory compliance and market conduct, including the impact of regulatory inquiries and investigations; the execution and integration of mergers, acquisitions, strategic investments and divestitures; our information technology infrastructure; a failure of information systems and Internet-enabled technology; dependence on third-party relationships, including outsourcing arrangements; business continuity; model errors; information management; liquidity risks - the possibility that we will not be able to fund all cash outflow commitments as they fall due; and other risks - COVID-19 matters, including the severity, duration and spread of COVID-19; its impact on the global economy, and its impact on Sun Life's business, financial condition
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2021 103
and or results; risks associated with IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments; our international operations, including our joint ventures; market conditions that affect our capital position or ability to raise capital; downgrades in financial strength or credit ratings; and tax matters, including estimates and judgements used in calculating taxes.
The following risk factors are related to our intention to purchase DentaQuest and our intention to sell our Canadian sponsored markets business to Canadian Premier that could have a material adverse effect on our forward-looking statements: (1) the ability of the parties to complete the transaction; (2) failure of the parties to obtain necessary consents and approvals or to otherwise satisfy the conditions to the completion of the transaction in a timely manner, or at all; (3) our ability to realize the financial and strategic benefits of the transaction; (4) the dedication of our resources to the completion of the transaction and the effect of the Canadian Premier transaction on our continuing operations in Canada; (5) the impact of the announcement of the relevant transaction on us and DentaQuest and us and Canadian Premier, and (6) the sponsored markets business' net asset value on close. These risks all could have an impact on our business relationships (including with future and prospective employees, Clients, distributors and partners) and could have a material adverse effect on our current and future operations, financial conditions and prospects.
The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.
104 December 31, 2021 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Annual Information Form
Sun Life Financial Inc.
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
February 9, 2022
Annual Information Form 2021
Table of Contents
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Annual Information Form | Management's Discussion & Analysis(1) | Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes(1) |
| | | |
| Corporate Structure | 3 | | |
| | | |
| Development of the Business | 3 | Section B | |
| | | |
| Business of Sun Life | 5 | Section B | |
| Financial Performance | | Section C | Notes 8-12 |
| Investments | | Section H | Note 5 |
| Risk Management | | Section J | Note 6 |
| | | |
| Capital Structure | 8 | Section I | Note 15 |
| | | |
| Dividends | 12 | Section I | Note 15 |
| | | |
| Security Ratings | 12 | Section F | |
| | | |
| Transfer Agents and Registrar | 15 | | |
| | | |
| Directors and Executive Officers | 16 | | |
| | | |
| Code of Conduct | 20 | | |
| | | |
| Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 20 | | |
| | | |
| Interests of Experts | 21 | | |
| | | |
| Regulatory Matters | 21 | Section B | |
| | | |
| Risk Factors | 35 | | |
| | | |
| Legal and Regulatory Proceedings | 53 | | |
| | | |
| Additional Information | 53 | | |
| | | |
| Appendix A - Charter of the Audit Committee | 54 | | |
(1) As indicated, parts of the Company’s MD&A, consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2021 are incorporated by reference in this AIF. The 2021 MD&A (as defined below) and the 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements (as defined below) may be accessed at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 1
Annual Information Form 2021
The following defined terms are used in this document.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Abbreviation | Description | Abbreviation | Description |
| AIF | Annual Information Form | OSFI | Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, Canada |
| Board | The Board of Directors of SLF Inc. | SEC | United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| IFRS | International Financial Reporting Standards | Sun Life Assurance | Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada |
| LICAT | Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test | SLF Inc. | Sun Life Financial Inc. |
| MD&A | Management's Discussion & Analysis | Superintendent | The Superintendent under the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Act |
| NAIC | National Association of Insurance Commissioners, United States | | |
Presentation of Information
In this AIF, SLF Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries are collectively referred to as “Sun Life”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” and also includes, where applicable, our joint ventures and associates.
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this AIF is presented as at and for the year ended December 31, 2021, and amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars. Financial information is presented in accordance with IFRS and the accounting requirements of OSFI.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
The following documents are incorporated by reference in and form part of this AIF:
(i)SLF Inc.'s MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2021 (our “2021 MD&A”), and
(ii)SLF Inc.'s Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2021 (our “2021 Consolidated Financial Statements”).
These documents have been filed with securities regulators in Canada and with the SEC and may be accessed at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively.
Forward-looking Statements
From time to time, the Company makes written or oral forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, including the "safe harbour" provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation. Certain statements in this AIF and the documents incorporated by reference herein including, (i) statements relating to our strategies, (ii) statements that are predictive in nature, (iii) statements that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, and (iv) statements that include words such as “achieve”, “aim”, “ambition”, “anticipate”, “aspiration”, “assumption”, “believe”, "continue", “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “goal”, "initiatives", “intend”, “may”, “objective”, “outlook”, “plan”, "potential", “project”, “seek”, “should”, “strategy”, “strive”, “target”, “will” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations. These statements represent our current expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events and are not historical facts, and remain subject to change, particularly in light of the ongoing and developing COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the global economy and its uncertain impact on our business. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Future results and shareholder value may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, among other factors, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic conditions on our operations, liquidity, financial conditions or results and the matters set out in this AIF under the heading Risk Factors and in our annual MD&A under the heading Forward-Looking Statements, and the factors detailed in our annual and interim financial statements and other filings with Canadian and U.S. securities regulators, which are available for review at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively.
Important risk factors that could cause our assumptions and estimates, and expectations and projections to be inaccurate and our actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this document, are set out below. The realization of our forward-looking statements, essentially depends on our business performance which, in turn, is subject to many risks, which have been further heightened with the current COVID-19 pandemic given the uncertainty of its duration and impact. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations include, but are not limited to: market risks - related to the performance of equity markets; changes or volatility in interest rates or credit spreads or swap spreads; real estate investments; and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; insurance risks - related to policyholder behaviour; mortality experience, morbidity experience and longevity; product design and pricing; the impact of higher-than-expected future expenses; and the availability, cost and effectiveness of reinsurance; credit risks - related to issuers of securities held in our investment portfolio, debtors, structured securities, reinsurers, counterparties, other financial institutions and other entities; business and strategic risks - related to global economic and political conditions; the design and implementation of
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 2
Annual Information Form 2021
business strategies; changes in distribution channels or Client behaviour including risks relating to market conduct by intermediaries and agents; the impact of mergers, acquisitions, strategic investments and divestitures; the impact of competition; the performance of our investments and investment portfolios managed for Clients; changes in the legal or regulatory environment, including capital requirements; the environment and social, environmental laws and regulations; operational risks - related to breaches or failure of information system security and privacy, including cyber-attacks; our ability to attract and retain employees; legal, regulatory compliance and market conduct, including the impact of regulatory inquiries and investigations; our information technology infrastructure; a failure of information systems and Internet-enabled technology; dependence on third-party relationships, including outsourcing arrangements; business continuity; model errors; information management; liquidity risks - the possibility that we will not be able to fund all cash outflow commitments as they fall due; and other risks - COVID-19 matters, including the severity, duration and spread of COVID-19, actions by governments, monetary authorities and regulators in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, its impact on the global economy and its impact on Sun Life's business, financial condition and/or results; risks associated with IFRS 17 and 9; our international operations, including our joint ventures; market conditions that affect our capital position or ability to raise capital; downgrades in financial strength or credit ratings; and tax matters, including estimates and judgments used in calculating taxes.
The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.
Corporate Structure
SLF Inc. was incorporated under the Insurance Companies Act, Canada (the “Insurance Act”) on August 5, 1999, to become the holding company of Sun Life Assurance in connection with the demutualization of Sun Life Assurance.
Sun Life Assurance was incorporated in 1865 as a stock insurance company and was converted into a mutual insurance company in 1962. On March 22, 2000, Sun Life Assurance implemented a plan of demutualization under which it converted back to a stock company pursuant to Letters Patent of Conversion issued under the Insurance Act. Under this plan of demutualization, Sun Life Assurance became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SLF Inc.
The head and registered office of SLF Inc. is located at 1 York Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 0B6.
SLF Inc. conducts its business worldwide through direct and indirect operating subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates. SLF Inc.’s principal subsidiaries are included in the subsidiaries listed in SLF Inc.’s annual report and that list of subsidiaries is incorporated herein by reference. That list includes the percentage of voting shares owned by SLF Inc., directly or indirectly, and where those companies are incorporated, continued, formed or organized. SLF Inc.’s current annual report is accessible on www.sedar.com, www.sec.gov and www.sunlife.com.
We manage our operations and report our financial results in five business segments: Canada, United States (“U.S.”), Asset Management, Asia and Corporate.
Development of the Business
Sun Life is a leading international financial services organization providing insurance, wealth and asset management solutions to individual and corporate Clients. Sun Life has operations in a number of markets worldwide, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom (“UK”), Ireland, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, India, China, Australia, Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia and Bermuda. As of December 31, 2021, Sun Life had total assets under management of $1.4 trillion.
Three Year History: Acquisitions, Disposals, and Other Developments
We assess our businesses and corporate strategies on an ongoing basis to ensure that we make optimal use of our capital and provide maximum shareholder value. The following summary outlines our major acquisitions, dispositions and other developments in the past three years in our business segments. Additional information is provided in Note 3 to SLF Inc.'s 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements.
Kevin Strain was appointed as President and a member of the Board, effective February 15, 2021, and upon the retirement of Dean Connor on August 6, 2021, was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer. On March 29, 2021, Manjit Singh was appointed as Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer. On December 9, 2021, Sun Life announced that William Anderson will retire as Chair and from the Board of Directors following the 2022 Annual Meeting. Mr. Anderson will be succeeded as Chair by Scott Powers following his re-election as a director at that meeting.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 3
Annual Information Form 2021
In early 2020, the world was impacted by COVID-19, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is still uncertain and dependent on the progression of the virus, including variants, mass vaccine production and distribution, vaccine efficacy, public acceptance of containment measures and vaccine adoption, the subsequent reduction in rates of infection and the actions taken by governments, monetary authorities, regulators, financial institutions, businesses and individuals, which could vary by country and result in differing outcomes. Given the extent of the circumstances, it is difficult to reliably measure or predict the potential impact of this uncertainty on our future financial results. Additional information can be found in our2021 MD&A under the heading "COVID 19", which section is incorporated by reference herein.
Canada
On December 13, 2021, we announced that Canadian Premier Life Insurance Company entered into an agreement to acquire the sponsored markets business from Sun Life Assurance. The transaction is expected to close in early 2023, subject to satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals.
On December 1, 2021, we increased our strategic investment in Dialogue, a Canadian telemedicine provider supporting our Lumino Health virtual health care platform.
In 2020, we made strategic investments in connection with commercial collaborations, including with Dialogue, and with GoRendezvous, an online booking software company that allows Clients to connect with paramedical service providers digitally and schedule appointments.
U.S.
On October 3, 2021, we entered into an agreement to acquire DentaQuest Group, Inc., a U.S. dental benefits provider. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2022, subject to receipt of regulatory approvals and satisfaction of customary closing conditions.
On July 1, 2021, we completed the acquisition of Pinnacle Care International, Inc., a U.S. health-care navigation and medical intelligence provider. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements.
Asset Management
On January 5, 2021, we completed the acquisition of a majority stake in Crescent Capital Group LP ("Crescent"), a global alternative credit investment manager, forming the alternative credit investing business of SLC Management. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements.
On July 1, 2020, we acquired 80% of InfraRed Capital Partners ("InfraRed"), a UK-based global infrastructure and real estate investment manager, as well as the ability to acquire the remaining interest in the future. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2019, we completed the acquisition of a majority stake in BentallGreenOak ("BGO"), forming the real estate business of SLC Management. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2020 Consolidated Financial Statements.
Asia
In October 2021, we reduced our stake in our India asset management joint venture, Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited, from 49% to 36.5% through an initial public offering.
Effective January 1, 2021, we launched an exclusive 15-year bancassurance partnership with Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank for the exclusive distribution of life insurance products of Sun Life Vietnam Insurance Company Limited ("Sun Life Vietnam").
In February 2020, we sold our ownership interest in Crescent Asia Limited, the holding company of Global Online Financial Solutions Limited, which operates TIMO, Vietnam's first digital bank. The previously disclosed arrangement with TIMO to offer life and health insurance products of Sun Life Vietnam to TIMO's membership base is still in effect.
In January 2020, we combined our International business and Hong Kong business into a new management structure called "International Hubs", to leverage the High Net Worth opportunities in Asia and offer our Clients and distribution partners best-in-class product and service offerings across all geographies. "Local Markets" is comprised of the Philippines, Indonesia, India, China, Malaysia and Vietnam. "International Hubs" is comprised of International, Hong Kong and Singapore.
In October 2019, we entered into a 15-year bancassurance partnership with Tien Phong Commercial Joint Stock Bank, a digital leader in Vietnamese banking, for the exclusive distribution of life insurance products of Sun Life Vietnam.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 4
Annual Information Form 2021
Business of Sun Life
Information about our business and operating segments, our strategy, products and methods of distribution, risk management policies and investment activities, is included in the 2021 MD&A, which is incorporated by reference in this AIF.
The global financial services industry continues to evolve in response to demographic, economic, and technological trends. Specific trends that have an impact on our businesses include:
Demographic
•Major demographic shifts in developed markets include the aging of baby boomers and the growth of millennials as a client segment. Aging baby boomers are generating greater demand for retirement solutions and health solutions as they retire, while millennials seek holistic financial advice and solutions, including protection and wealth accumulation products in preparation for major life events.
•The number of High Net Worth Individuals ("HNWI") and their pool of wealth continues to expand. Within this segment, Asia has witnessed the fastest growth, surpassing North America as the region with the largest share of wealth held by HNWIs. As this segment continues to grow, opportunities will exist for financial service providers, with individuals seeking solutions that enable them to optimally transfer wealth to future generations.
•The trend of governments and employers downloading responsibility to individuals continues. This has created demand for protection, group benefits and group retirement solutions as individuals seek to fill the gaps. To help them make some of these decisions, consumers are seeking financial advice and assistance with financial planning. However, it is worth noting that the current COVID-19 pandemic may cause governments in some jurisdictions to reverse this trend.
•Growing prosperity in Asia is resulting in the rise of the young middle class in many Asian countries, although the pace of growth may slow due to economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This is increasing the demand for a wide variety of financial products, including insurance, savings and investment vehicles. Low financial literacy has also increased the importance of financial education and advice in this region. These markets have low penetration rates and are expected to grow much faster than industrialized countries. In certain Asian markets, such as Hong Kong and China, the aging population is creating a growing opportunity for retirement and health solutions.
•Changes in the nature of work and the rise of the gig economy, where work is temporary, contractual or project-based, has created an opportunity to provide solutions to workers who are left unsupported across key life needs (e.g. savings, benefits, and protection).
•Consumers are more proactively managing both physical and mental health and wellness, leading to an increased demand for solutions in this area. Additionally, the current COVID-19 pandemic is having a negative impact on the mental health and well-being of people around the world. This may lead to increased demand for tools and products to support mental health and well-being.
•Desire for greater transparency has caused consumers to question whether they are getting their full value for money spent on products and services, such as financial advice. This has resulted in an increase in demand for low-cost asset management products, such as index funds.
Economic
•Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, we had seen an improvement in economic conditions in recent years across many of our main markets (including Canada, U.S. and Asia). However, the current COVID-19 pandemic has led to a global economic downturn affecting many of our markets. Additionally, we are seeing changes in the geopolitical landscape that may affect the business and regulatory environment in some markets in which we operate. We believe this period of increased economic, market and geopolitical volatility will continue, and are monitoring developments closely.
•We are aware there will be long-term effects from the fiscal and monetary support governments enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic. This may include elevated government debt to GDP ratios, prolonged periods of low interest rates, potential for sustained inflation/stagflation and possible tax increases. We are monitoring the situation continuously and are ready to take actions as needed to minimize impact.
•The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted labour market supply chains and led to an acceleration of income and wealth inequality. This may lead to a slow-down of growth for the middle class in some markets.
•Low interest rates are impacting the ability for investors to achieve higher yield with relatively lower risk investments. In search for greater returns investors are seeking alternatives, which offer greater yield in exchange for illiquidity in order to meet their target returns.
•The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of digital technology to allow for remote work. Companies may rely more heavily on these digital tools and shift more of their workforce to remote work. This, in turn, may have an impact on the commercial real estate market.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 5
Annual Information Form 2021
Technological
•Digital adoption continues to grow rapidly as consumers spend an increasing amount of time online for everyday needs (e.g., social, shopping, and banking). An increase in mobile usage is an especially important part of this shift. The COVID-19 pandemic has also accelerated this shift to digital in many industries, including financial services. Omni-channel capabilities are important to create a consistent Client experience across channels and to serve Clients in their channel of choice.
•The trend of increasing personalization using data and analytics is allowing companies to create a frictionless digital user experience as they are able to better engage with Clients and meet their needs.
•Consumers continue to transfer expectations from technology companies to financial services. A seamless digital experience and personalization of advice and services is increasingly important in creating better experiences and outcomes for Clients.
•Consumers are becoming more concerned about the protection and use of their data in an environment of increasing collection and use of their data, and data breaches. Meeting those Client concerns and expectations will be key to maintaining their trust.
•The COVID-19 pandemic has also accelerated the adoption of digital health technologies, including telehealth and remote care.
Competition
The markets in which Sun Life participates are highly competitive. We compete against other insurance companies, banks, asset managers, mutual fund companies, financial planners and other financial services providers. Frequently, competition is based on factors including price, the ability to provide value-added products and services, financial strength and consistent delivery of an excellent experience to distributors and Clients through both traditional and more innovative digital channels.
Sustained low investment yields (and tightening investment spreads) and evolving regulatory requirements continue to be challenges for our industry and have forced insurers and financial services providers to review their businesses, re-focus their operations and, in some cases, discontinue or divest non-core lines of business, as well as acquire businesses with higher growth potential. We are also seeing alternative asset managers (including private equity) playing a larger role in several markets.
We also face increasing competition from new market entrants, including non-traditional service providers such as insurtech and fintech companies. The acceleration of the shift to digital interactions brought by the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to an increase in this trend, and a further rise of new market entrants with disruptive digital business models. In addition, incumbents are increasingly partnering with start-ups to compete in new and innovative ways. Both of these trends could challenge existing insurance, asset management and wealth management business models. In addition, big technology companies are entering the financial services and healthcare markets by leveraging their large customer base, strong user experience capabilities, deep pools of data and digital ecosystems offering interconnected services. In response to these trends, Sun Life continues to explore new business models and seek strategic partnerships that will drive our businesses forward.
In Canada, the federal government is considering implementing a framework for open banking, which is an application of data portability to the financial services industry. Under open banking, clients of banks, fintechs or other financial institutions would be able to ask for their personal data to be securely transferred or made available to an authorized third-party service provider, such as a fintech or another financial institution. The government’s goal is to implement an open banking framework by early 2023. We are continuing to monitor how this development will affect Sun Life and the broader financial services industry.
In addition to closely monitoring potential business disruptors, we also continuously adapt by making investments in technology and advanced analytics, building digital services and tools, and through the extension of our product offerings. Below are some examples of how we are adapting in these areas:
•Digitizing current interactions and processes: Web and mobile functionality (e.g., e-Applications, e-claims); facilitating virtual interactions (e.g., video meetings, e-signatures); digital benefits enrollment in the U.S. and for small businesses in Canada.
•Using data and analytics to be personal, predictive and proactive: Digital coach Ella in Canada; Maxwell Health, a digital benefits marketplace in the U.S.; predictive models for advisor recruiting and Client retention in Asia
•Building new business models: Lumino Health, which allows all Canadians to access provider search and discover innovative health solutions; working with bancassurance partners in Asia to offer digital sales; further expanding our role in the healthcare ecosystem in the U.S. through the acquisition of PinnacleCare
•Building a partnership ecosystem: Making strategic investments and collaborations (e.g., Dialogue, a leading virtual healthcare provider in Canada; Bowtie, Hong Kong's first online-only insurer); investing in technologies to connect with partners and drive global growth.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 6
Annual Information Form 2021
The markets in which we compete are diverse and at different stages of development:
•In Canada, the financial services industry is relatively mature and the three largest life insurance companies serve more than two-thirds of the Canadian life insurance and group benefits markets. In the wealth space, we also face competition from Canadian retail banks and investment dealers and also from emerging disruptors such as “robo-advisors”.
•In the United States, the largest insurance market in the world, the market is more fragmented and characterized by a large number of competitors. We face strong competition from established players in the group life and disability, dental, vision, stop-loss, and voluntary markets, all of which are markets with a number of competitors. In the turnkey disability market, there is one other primary competitor and competition is expected to remain stable.
•In Asia, the life insurance markets in countries where we participate are still evolving. The growth potential for insurance in Asian markets has created strong competition from both domestic and international insurers. We are observing the larger pan-Asian insurers grow at the fastest rate, with consolidation occurring in many markets. Additionally, some of the Asian markets that we operate in have foreign ownership restrictions, which may place constraints on our ability to operate or grow in these markets. In the international High Net Worth life insurance market (which for Sun Life operates out of our Asia business group), competition is increasing from the main competitors who operate in this business.
•In Asset Management, despite some consolidation, we face strong competition from a variety of players including large global asset managers, small local managers specializing in niche markets/products, multi-national and local banks as well as other insurance companies. In addition, there has been a trend among retail and institutional investors towards lower-cost passive investment products, including index and other types of exchange-traded funds, which has led to a decreased allocation of investor assets to active investment strategies. At the same time, there has been an increased demand for fixed-income, liability-driven investing and yield-oriented alternative products among institutional and High Net Worth investors. This trend may accelerate, given the prolonged period of low interest rates exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Seasonality
Some of our businesses are subject to seasonal factors. In Canada, sales of investment products spike during the first quarter of the year due to a contribution deadline for Registered Retirement Savings Plans. Timing of sales campaigns also influences sales of individual products in Canada and Asia. In the U.S., the sales pattern of our group life and health business largely reflects the renewal timing of employee benefit plans of our corporate Clients, many of which begin on January 1 each year. This often results in higher sales in the fourth quarter. In India, the sales of individual insurance products usually peak in the first quarter of each year due to tax planning by Clients. Overall, the impact of seasonal trends is not material to Sun Life.
Number of Employees
As at December 31, 2021, we had 24,589 full-time equivalent employees across our operations excluding joint ventures and associates.
| | | | | |
| Business Segment | Employees(1)(2) |
| Canada | 7,032 | |
| U.S. | 3,656 | |
| Asset Management | 4,147 | |
| Asia | 4,814 | |
Corporate(3) | 4,941 | |
|
(1) As at December 31, 2021, we had approximately 48,165 employees across our operations, including our Asia joint ventures.
(2) Excludes temporary staff.
(3) Corporate includes the operations of our UK business unit and enterprise services.
Sustainability Commitment
Sustainability is a core strategic priority that supports our Purpose. We aspire to lead the global financial industry in helping to create a cleaner, more inclusive and more sustainable future. Our commitment to lead responds to global challenges and an increasing public desire for corporations to support sustainability. Strong sustainability initiatives and practices support our Purpose of helping our Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives.
Building from a long-standing foundation as a trusted and responsible business, our Sustainability Plan focuses on our areas of expertise where we can have the most positive social and environmental impact, while creating competitive advantage for our business:
•Increasing financial security,
•Fostering healthier lives, and
•Advancing sustainable investing.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 7
Annual Information Form 2021
Our sustainability commitment is guided by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals ("SDGs"). We focus primarily on supporting the five SDGs where we believe we can have the greatest influence and impact. These are: #3 Good health & well-being, #5 Gender equality, #7 Affordable and clean energy, #8 Decent work and economic growth and #13 Climate action.
We aspire to increase the lifetime financial security of our Clients, employees and communities. We’re helping Clients take positive financial action, and increasing access to and use of wealth and protection products. In 2021, in Canada we piloted a tool that helps young workers apply a portion of their employer’s workplace savings plan contributions to their student debt, and one that supports microinvesting. We advocated and collaborated with Members of U.S. Congress to design a federal Paid Family and Medical Leave program. If adopted, the proposal will help families across the U.S. The proposal includes an option for employers to work with insurers to coordinate benefits. In addition, we worked with several leading companies across Asia to create more opportunities to access affordable insurance.
We aspire to improve health and wellness outcomes for Clients, employees and communities. We help Clients navigate, manage and receive the care they need, while expanding access to and use of health insurance, to help Clients live their healthiest lives. In Canada, we expanded our Lumino Health Virtual Care powered by Dialogue. 556,000 Clients and their family members had access to the service in 2021. Shortly after Sun Life U.S. acquired PinnacleCare, we launched Health Navigator. This service helps Clients navigate the complex U.S. health care system and care options, improving costs and outcomes for both the employee and employer. We maintained our long-standing focus on community health and wellness, investing in initiatives that encourage healthy and active living in our communities. Since 2012, we have been committed to the fight against diabetes. We focus on corporate giving on diabetes awareness, prevention and care. In 2021, we also boosted our charitable funding to help people and communities hit hard by the pandemic and continued to support under-represented groups, with an emphasis on Black-led and Indigenous initiatives in Canada.
We aspire to deliver sustainable returns for Clients and drive the transition to a low-carbon, inclusive economy. Sun Life built on its position as a leader in sustainable investing in 2021. Sun Life has targeted an additional $20 billion in sustainable investments across its General Account and Client investments, which are managed by SLC Management. Investments include, but are not limited to, renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable buildings, clean transportation, water management, and social infrastructure projects. In 2021, SLC Management appointed a Global Head of ESG ("ESG") to further build on the firm’s commitment to sustainable investing. MFS Investment Management ("MFS") continued to receive top environmental, social and governance assessments from rating entities, and BGO's global real estate investment platform received top rankings in the 2021 GRESB Real Estate Benchmark. Sun Life Assurance was the first major Canadian life insurer to sign on to the United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment ("PRI"). All companies in our Asset Management pillar are also signatories and receive top grades in PRI assessments.
Consistent with our foundational commitment to operate as a trusted and responsible business, we recognize climate change as one of the defining issues of our time and commit to working together across industries, with our Clients, investees and other stakeholders to contribute to solving this global challenge. We believe it is incumbent upon us to respond and to take actions that support the goal of the Paris Agreement to limit the global temperature increase in this century to well below 2 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
In 2021, Sun Life deepened its global commitment to sustainability with a goal to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions by 2050 for both its investments and operations. As an asset owner, Sun Life plans to achieve net-zero GHG emissions in its General Account, managed by SLC Management. Sun Life's other asset management companies will also drive net-zero efforts. MFS, SLGI Asset Management, and SLC Management companies, InfraRed and BGO, have joined the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, an international group of asset managers committed to supporting the goal of net-zero emissions by 2050 or sooner. Sun Life will target a 50% absolute reduction of GHG emissions in its operations by 2030, relative to 2019. This target includes emissions reductions from Sun Life's offices and corporate travel.(1)
Sun Life is a supporter of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures ("TCFD"), and a member of the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative and signatory to the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment. We also support and participate in several other sustainability-related forums, meetings and discussions with a range of external stakeholders. Sun Life ranked among the 2021 Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World. This was the 12th consecutive year Sun Life was named to the ranking, and we were the only North American insurance company to appear on the list. Sun Life was also included on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index - North America, and continues to be a constituent in the FTSE4Good Index.
(1) Scope 1 and 2, and Scope 3 corporate travel, water and landlord-paid utility emissions at corporate offices globally Scope 1 and 2 emissions of corporate offices globally, and Scope 3 emissions resulting from the water supply and landlord-paid utility services to these offices, as well as from corporate travel, per the GHG Protocol.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 8
Annual Information Form 2021
To have a resilient, sustainable business, diversity and inclusion must serve as a catalyst. In 2020, Sun Life reinforced its commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion by taking a firm stance for equality, social change and justice to support under-represented communities. Sun Life continues to work towards its goals of 25% underrepresented ethnicities in Vice-President (VP)+ roles in North America, and 50% women in VP+ roles globally, by 2025. In 2021, we launched the Dean Connor Sun Life Inclusion Scholarships for Black and Indigenous Students – a new scholarship program designed to equip Black and Indigenous youth with new skills and valuable work experience. Dean Connor led Sun Life for a decade as President and CEO, until his recent retirement in 2021. The scholarship honours his passion and advocacy for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Sun Life is a signatory to the goals in the BlackNorth Initiative and is pursuing Progressive Aboriginal Relations certification to foster a diverse workforce that represents the communities where we live and work.
Our commitment to sustainability is set out in our Sustainability Policy and in our Code of Conduct which applies to all employees and directors. The Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee of the Board provides oversight of our enterprise-wide Sustainability Policy and sustainability program, including reviewing and recommending approval of the annual Sustainability Report and Sustainability Plan to the Board. At the management level, in 2021, Sun Life appointed its first Chief Sustainability Officer, reporting directly to the CEO. In addition, our International Sustainability Council is composed of senior representatives from a diverse range of geographic regions, business groups and functions. This Council supports the implementation of our Sustainability Plan, through the areas of focus that align with their business. They champion, influence and drive action. The Council works closely with the Sustainability team on strategy and policy development and monitoring, and risk escalation. The Council meets regularly and reports progress to our senior executive management and to the Governance, Investment and Conduct Review Committee.
Additional details on our Sustainability Plan, and our most recent Sustainability Report, can be found on our website at www.sunlife.com/Sustainability. Additional climate-related disclosures, guided by the TCFD recommendations, can be found under the heading "Environmental and Social Risk" in our 2021 MD&A, which is incorporated by reference herein. For more information on our commitment to promote diversity and inclusion, please visit www.sunlife.com/en/sustainability/diversity-and-inclusion/.
Capital Structure
General
SLF Inc.'s authorized capital consists of unlimited numbers of Common Shares, Class A Shares and Class B Shares, each without nominal or par value.
The Class A Shares and Class B Shares may be issued in series as determined by SLF Inc.'s Board. The Board is authorized to fix the number, consideration per share, designation and rights and restrictions attached to each series of shares. The holders of Class A Shares and Class B Shares are not entitled to any voting rights except as described below or as otherwise provided by law. Additional information concerning our capital structure is included in SLF Inc.'s 2021 MD&A under the heading Capital and Liquidity Management and in Notes 13-15 and 21 to the 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements.
Common Shares
SLF Inc.’s Common Shares are listed on the Toronto, New York and Philippines stock exchanges, under the ticker symbol “SLF”. Each Common Share is entitled to one vote at meetings of the shareholders of SLF Inc., except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series of shares are entitled to vote separately as a class or series.
Common Shares are entitled to receive dividends if and when declared by the Board. Dividends must be declared and paid in equal amounts per share on all Common Shares, subject to the rights of holders of the Class A Shares and Class B Shares. Holders of Common Shares will participate in any distribution of the net assets of SLF Inc. upon its liquidation, dissolution or winding-up on an equal basis per share, subject to the rights of the holders of the Class A Shares and Class B Shares. There are no pre-emptive, redemption, purchase or conversion rights attaching to the Common Shares.
Class A Shares
The Class A Shares of each series rank on parity with the Class A Shares of each other series with respect to the payment of dividends and the return of capital on the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of SLF Inc. The Class A Shares are entitled to preference over the Class B Shares, the Common Shares and any other shares ranking junior to the Class A Shares with respect to the payment of dividends and the return of capital. The special rights and restrictions attaching to the Class A Shares as a class may not be amended without such approval as may then be required by law, subject to a minimum requirement of approval by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting of the holders of Class A Shares held for that purpose.
The following table provides information on SLF Inc.'s issued and outstanding Class A Shares (the “Class A Preferred Shares”). These Class A Preferred Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”), with the exception of Series 14.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 9
Annual Information Form 2021
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Series | Number of Shares Issued | TSX Ticker Symbol | Quarterly Dividend ($) | Redemption Date | Prospectus Date |
| Series 3 | 10,000,000 | SLF.PR.C | 0.278125 | | Any time | January 6, 2006 |
| Series 4 | 12,000,000 | SLF.PR.D | 0.278125 | | Any time | October 2, 2006 |
| Series 5 | 10,000,000 | SLF.PR.E | 0.28125 | | Any time | January 25, 2007 |
| Series 8R | 6,217,331 | | SLF.PR.G | 0.114063 | | June 30, 2025 | May 13, 2010 |
| Series 9QR | 4,982,669 | | SLF.PR.J | Floating | | June 30, 2025 | May 13, 2010 |
| Series 10R | 6,838,672 | | SLF.PR.H | 0.185438 | | September 30, 2026 | August 5, 2011 |
| Series 11QR | 1,161,328 | | SLF.PR.K | Floating | | September 30, 2026 | August 5, 2011 |
| Series 14 | 1,000,000 | | n.a. | n.a. | | June 30, 2026 | June 24, 2021 |
With the exception of Series 14, the shares in each series of Class A Preferred Shares were issued for $25 per share and holders are entitled to receive the non-cumulative quarterly dividends outlined in the preceding table. Subject to regulatory approval, SLF Inc. may redeem: (i) the Series 3, 4 or 5 shares at any time; (ii) the Series 8R, 9QR, 10R and 11QR on the redemption date noted above and every five years thereafter for $25 per share; and (iii) the Series 9QR and 11QR at any other time for $25.50 per share, in each case in whole or in part. The Series 14 shares were issued as part of the offering of 3.60% Limited Recourse Capital Notes Series 2021-1 (the "Series 2021-1 Notes"), for $1,000 per share and are held by a consolidated trust (the "Limited Recourse Trust") as trust assets in connection with the Series 2021-1 Notes. In case of non-payment of interest on or principal of the Series 2021-1 Notes when due, the recourse of each noteholder will be limited to that holder's proportionate share of the Limited Recourse Trust's assets, which will consist of the Series 14 shares (except in limited circumstances). At this time the limited recourse trustee, as trustee of the Limited Recourse Trust, has waived its right to receive any and all dividends on the Series 14 shares. Accordingly, no dividends are expected to be declared or paid on the Series 14 shares while the Series 14 shares are held by the Limited Recourse Trust. Additional information concerning these shares is contained in the Investor Relations section of www.sunlife.com and in the prospectus and prospectus supplement under which the shares were issued, which may be accessed at www.sedar.com.
Class B Shares
The Class B Shares of each series rank on a parity with the Class B Shares of each other series with respect to the payment of dividends and the return of capital on the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of SLF Inc. The Class B Shares are entitled to preference over the Common Shares and any other shares ranking junior to the Class B Shares with respect to the payment of dividends and the return of capital, but are subordinate to the Class A Shares and any other shares ranking senior to the Class B Shares with respect to the payment of dividends and return of capital. The special rights and restrictions attaching to the Class B Shares as a class may not be amended without such approval as may then be required by law, subject to a minimum requirement of approval by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting of the holders of Class B Shares held for that purpose. No Class B Shares have been issued.
Constraints on Shares
The Insurance Act contains restrictions on the purchase or other acquisition, issue, transfer and voting of the shares of SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance. Information on those restrictions can be found in this AIF under the heading Regulatory Matters - Canada - Restrictions on Ownership.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 10
Annual Information Form 2021
Market for Securities
The following tables set out the price range and trading volumes of SLF Inc.'s Common Shares and Class A Preferred Shares on the TSX during 2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common Shares |
| Price ($) | Trading volume |
| High | | Low | Close | (thousands) |
| January | 62.07 | | | 55.92 | | | 59.10 | | | 28,171 | |
| February | 63.95 | | | 59.24 | | | 61.24 | | | 56,726 | |
| March | 65.37 | | | 61.58 | | | 63.51 | | | 56,747 | |
| April | 67.14 | | | 63.06 | | | 66.31 | | | 24,142 | |
| May | 67.26 | | | 63.57 | | | 64.68 | | | 64,445 | |
| June | 66.04 | | | 62.04 | | | 63.92 | | | 43,081 | |
| July | 64.98 | | | 62.00 | | | 64.98 | | | 20,034 | |
| August | 67.01 | | | 64.34 | | | 64.96 | | | 65,164 | |
| September | 66.42 | | | 62.72 | | | 65.20 | | | 34,336 | |
| October | 71.47 | | | 64.51 | | | 70.53 | | | 23,874 | |
| November | 71.73 | | | 67.28 | | | 67.83 | | | 70,976 | |
| December | 70.96 | | | 67.51 | | | 70.41 | | | 25,707 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Class A Preferred Shares |
| | | | |
| Series 1 | | Series 2 |
| Price ($) | Trading volume | | Price ($) | Trading volume |
| High | Low | Close | (thousands) | | High | Low | Close | (thousands) |
| January | 24.95 | | | 24.59 | | | 24.78 | | | 217 | | | 25.09 | | | 24.61 | | | 24.93 | | | 315 | |
| February | 25.41 | | | 24.72 | | | 24.87 | | | 136 | | | 25.55 | | | 24.75 | | | 24.85 | | | 383 | |
| March | 25.12 | | | 24.75 | | | 24.97 | | | 936 | | | 25.15 | | | 24.76 | | | 25.15 | | | 293 | |
| April | 25.28 | | | 24.77 | | | 25.28 | | | 196 | | | 25.45 | | | 24.90 | | | 25.45 | | | 108 | |
| May | 25.87 | | | 25.05 | | | 25.87 | | | 182 | | | 25.60 | | | 25.10 | | | 25.60 | | | 89 | |
| June | 25.56 | | | 25.01 | | | 25.15 | | | 382 | | | 25.60 | | | 25.15 | | | 25.19 | | | 276 | |
| July | 25.40 | | | 25.11 | | | 25.33 | | | 187 | | | 25.36 | | | 25.10 | | | 25.28 | | | 193 | |
| August | 25.37 | | | 24.97 | | | 24.98 | | | 1,036 | | | 25.39 | | | 24.97 | | | 24.97 | | | 292 | |
| September | 25.00 | | | 24.97 | | | 24.99 | | | 171 | | | 25.02 | | | 24.97 | | | 25.01 | | | 438 | |
| October | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| November | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| December | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series 3 | | Series 4 |
| Price ($) | Trading volume | | Price ($) | Trading volume |
| High | Low | Close | (thousands) | | High | Low | Close | (thousands) |
| January | 24.39 | | | 23.92 | | | 24.08 | | | 151 | | | 24.45 | | | 23.88 | | | 24.06 | | | 124 | |
| February | 24.96 | | | 23.94 | | | 23.95 | | | 144 | | | 24.95 | | | 24.02 | | | 24.15 | | | 181 | |
| March | 24.73 | | | 23.85 | | | 24.72 | | | 238 | | | 25.04 | | | 23.94 | | | 24.90 | | | 237 | |
| April | 24.59 | | | 24.01 | | | 24.58 | | | 143 | | | 24.94 | | | 24.03 | | | 24.62 | | | 303 | |
| May | 24.95 | | | 24.50 | | | 24.95 | | | 227 | | | 25.05 | | | 24.59 | | | 25.04 | | | 165 | |
| June | 25.10 | | | 24.80 | | | 25.09 | | | 142 | | | 25.23 | | | 24.71 | | | 25.23 | | | 135 | |
| July | 25.25 | | | 24.91 | | | 25.08 | | | 175 | | | 25.36 | | | 24.85 | | | 25.14 | | | 185 | |
| August | 25.40 | | | 25.00 | | | 25.15 | | | 129 | | | 25.36 | | | 25.01 | | | 25.15 | | | 933 | |
| September | 25.50 | | | 25.15 | | | 25.41 | | | 161 | | | 25.60 | | | 25.15 | | | 25.45 | | | 211 | |
| October | 25.51 | | | 24.41 | | | 24.57 | | | 203 | | | 25.43 | | | 24.50 | | | 24.72 | | | 81 | |
| November | 25.07 | | | 24.19 | | | 24.45 | | | 57 | | | 25.90 | | | 24.55 | | | 24.72 | | | 289 | |
| December | 25.00 | | | 24.49 | | | 25.00 | | | 106 | | | 25.16 | | | 24.56 | | | 25.16 | | | 79 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 11
Annual Information Form 2021
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series 5 | | Series 8R |
| Price ($) | Trading volume | | Price ($) | Trading volume |
| High | Low | Close | (thousands) | | High | Low | Close | (thousands) |
| January | 24.33 | | | 23.99 | | | 24.08 | | | 97 | | | 13.00 | | | 11.75 | | | 12.84 | | | 137 | |
| February | 25.11 | | | 24.03 | | | 24.22 | | | 219 | | | 15.39 | | | 12.55 | | | 14.80 | | | 474 | |
| March | 24.96 | | | 24.19 | | | 24.94 | | | 311 | | | 15.73 | | | 14.51 | | | 15.00 | | | 155 | |
| April | 24.75 | | | 24.14 | | | 24.65 | | | 524 | | | 15.88 | | | 14.80 | | | 15.49 | | | 272 | |
| May | 25.07 | | | 24.58 | | | 24.90 | | | 114 | | | 15.60 | | | 14.96 | | | 15.22 | | | 154 | |
| June | 25.19 | | | 24.71 | | | 25.13 | | | 121 | | | 16.14 | | | 15.19 | | | 15.98 | | | 403 | |
| July | 25.25 | | | 24.86 | | | 25.16 | | | 69 | | | 16.49 | | | 15.32 | | | 16.21 | | | 113 | |
| August | 25.39 | | | 25.01 | | | 25.18 | | | 250 | | | 17.59 | | | 16.00 | | | 17.04 | | | 199 | |
| September | 25.75 | | | 25.18 | | | 25.53 | | | 345 | | | 17.44 | | | 16.45 | | | 17.31 | | | 162 | |
| October | 25.53 | | | 24.62 | | | 24.73 | | | 119 | | | 19.07 | | | 17.40 | | | 18.07 | | | 404 | |
| November | 25.16 | | | 24.61 | | | 24.65 | | | 154 | | | 18.77 | | | 17.95 | | | 17.99 | | | 148 | |
| December | 25.32 | | | 24.52 | | | 25.27 | | | 72 | | | 18.39 | | | 16.85 | | | 18.39 | | | 27 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series 9QR | | Series 10R |
| Price ($) | Trading volume | | Price ($) | Trading volume |
| High | Low | Close | (thousands) | | High | Low | Close | (thousands) |
| January | 12.05 | | | 10.87 | | | 12.00 | | | 48 | | | 19.43 | | | 18.15 | | | 18.55 | | | 453 | |
| February | 15.49 | | | 11.96 | | | 14.25 | | | 285 | | | 21.50 | | | 18.44 | | | 20.99 | | | 380 | |
| March | 14.87 | | | 13.99 | | | 14.50 | | | 106 | | | 21.34 | | | 20.87 | | | 21.00 | | | 133 | |
| April | 15.35 | | | 14.33 | | | 14.65 | | | 238 | | | 21.29 | | | 20.71 | | | 21.24 | | | 52 | |
| May | 14.96 | | | 14.14 | | | 14.85 | | | 88 | | | 21.90 | | | 21.00 | | | 21.55 | | | 65 | |
| June | 15.71 | | | 14.70 | | | 15.33 | | | 128 | | | 23.49 | | | 21.09 | | | 23.42 | | | 111 | |
| July | 15.69 | | | 15.00 | | | 15.20 | | | 34 | | | 23.76 | | | 23.27 | | | 23.75 | | | 170 | |
| August | 15.65 | | | 15.05 | | | 15.45 | | | 21 | | | 23.74 | | | 23.05 | | | 23.07 | | | 259 | |
| September | 17.00 | | | 15.46 | | | 16.70 | | | 45 | | | 23.63 | | | 23.00 | | | 23.63 | | | 201 | |
| October | 17.90 | | | 16.80 | | | 17.90 | | | 66 | | | 23.76 | | | 22.91 | | | 23.21 | | | 159 | |
| November | 18.10 | | | 17.15 | | | 17.15 | | | 205 | | | 23.45 | | | 22.86 | | | 22.93 | | | 74 | |
| December | 17.30 | | | 16.00 | | | 16.65 | | | 41 | | | 22.99 | | | 22.12 | | | 22.99 | | | 64 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Series 11QR | | Series 12R |
| Price ($) | Trading volume | | Price ($) | Trading volume |
| High | Low | Close | (thousands) | | High | Low | Close | (thousands) |
| January | 18.46 | | | 17.25 | | | 18.00 | | | 44 | | | 22.06 | | 20.90 | | 21.45 | | 82 | |
| February | 21.45 | | | 18.10 | | | 20.61 | | | 28 | | | 24.74 | | 21.32 | | 24.25 | | 389 | |
| March | 21.00 | | | 20.35 | | | 20.60 | | | 41 | | | 24.40 | | 23.45 | | 24.40 | | 439 | |
| April | 20.99 | | | 20.55 | | | 20.70 | | | 11 | | | 24.75 | | 23.90 | | 24.75 | | 185 | |
| May | 21.25 | | | 20.74 | | | 20.90 | | | 17 | | | 25.07 | | 24.37 | | 24.93 | | 242 | |
| June | 23.08 | | | 21.17 | | | 23.08 | | | 26 | | | 25.40 | | 24.58 | | 25.12 | | 880 | |
| July | 23.60 | | | 23.08 | | | 23.49 | | | 13 | | | 25.29 | | 25.00 | | 25.29 | | 213 | |
| August | 23.46 | | | 23.00 | | | 23.01 | | | 50 | | | 25.44 | | 25.05 | | 25.10 | | 297 | |
| September | 23.34 | | | 22.36 | | | 23.00 | | | 5 | | | 25.21 | | 25.00 | | 25.17 | | 261 | |
| October | 23.50 | | | 22.70 | | | 23.00 | | | 7 | | | 25.23 | | 24.99 | | 25.22 | | 112 | |
| November | 23.25 | | | 22.83 | | | 22.83 | | | 7 | | | 25.25 | | 24.90 | | 25.04 | | 176 | |
| December | 22.83 | | | 21.80 | | | 21.80 | | | 3 | | | 25.00 | | 24.97 | | 24.99 | | 1,295 | |
Sales of Unlisted Securities
SLF Inc. has issued the following unlisted securities since January 1, 2021:
On June 30, 2021, SLF Inc. issued $1 billion principal amount of 3.60% Limited Recourse Capital Notes Series 2021-1 ("Series 2021-1 Notes"), maturing on June 30, 2081. The Series 2021-1 Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.60% payable semi-annually, until June 30, 2026. On June 30, 2026 and every five years thereafter until June 30, 2076, the interest rate on the Series 2021-1 Notes will be reset at an interest rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada yield as defined in the prospectus, plus 2.604%.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 12
Annual Information Form 2021
On June 30, 2021, in connection with the Series 2021-1 Notes, SLF Inc. issued 1 million Class A Non-Cumulative Rate Reset Preferred Shares Series 14 for $1,000 per share to be held by Computershare Trust Company of Canada as trustee of a newly formed trust.
On November 18, 2021, SLF Inc. issued $500 million principal amount of Series 2021-1 Subordinated Unsecured 2.46% Fixed/Floating Debentures due 2031, $1 billion principal amount of Series 2021-2 Subordinated Unsecured 2.80% Fixed/Floating Debentures due 2033 and $500 million principal amount of Series 2021-3 Subordinated Unsecured 3.15% Fixed/Floating Debentures due 2036.
Dividends
The declaration, amount and payment of dividends by SLF Inc. is subject to the approval of its Board and is dependent on our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, regulatory and contractual restrictions and other factors considered by the Board.
The dividends declared by SLF Inc. in the three years ended December 31, 2021 are set out in the 2021 MD&A under the heading Capital and Liquidity Management - Shareholder Dividends, which is incorporated by reference in this AIF.
The Insurance Act prohibits the declaration or payment of dividends on shares of an insurance company if there are reasonable grounds for believing a company does not have, or the payment of the dividend would cause the company not to have, adequate capital or liquidity, or upon any direction made by the Superintendent. The Insurance Act also requires that an insurance company notify the Superintendent of the declaration of a dividend at least fifteen days before the dividend payment date. On March 13, 2020, OSFI set the expectation for all federally regulated financial institutions that dividend increases should be halted for the time being. On November 4, 2021, OSFI removed its expectations that federally regulated financial institutions halt dividend increases.
As a holding company, SLF Inc. depends primarily on the receipt of funds from its subsidiaries to pay shareholder dividends, interest payments and operating expenses. The source of these funds is primarily dividends and capital repayments that SLF Inc. receives from its subsidiaries. The inability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends or return capital in the future may materially impair SLF Inc.'s ability to pay dividends to shareholders or to meet its cash obligations. Additional information concerning legislation regulating the ability of SLF Inc.'s subsidiaries in Canada, the U.S., the UK and Asia to pay dividends or return capital can be found in this AIF under the heading Regulatory Matters.
SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance have each covenanted that, if a distribution is not paid when due on any outstanding Sun Life ExchangEable Capital Securities (“SLEECS”) issued by Sun Life Capital Trust, Sun Life Assurance will not pay dividends on its Public Preferred Shares, if any are outstanding. If Sun Life Assurance does not have any Public Preferred Shares, then SLF Inc. will not pay dividends on its preferred shares or Common Shares until the twelfth month following the failure to pay the required distribution in full, unless the required distribution is paid to the holders of the SLEECS. Public Preferred Shares means preferred shares issued by Sun Life Assurance which: (a) have been issued to the public (excluding any preferred shares held beneficially by affiliates of Sun Life Assurance); (b) are listed on a recognized stock exchange; and (c) have an aggregate liquidation entitlement of at least $200 million. Sun Life Assurance has not issued any shares that qualify as Public Preferred Shares as at the date of this AIF.
The terms of SLF Inc.'s outstanding Class A Preferred Shares provide that for so long as Sun Life Assurance is a subsidiary, no dividends on such preferred shares may be declared or paid if Sun Life Assurance’s minimum regulatory capital ratio falls below the applicable threshold.
Security Ratings
SLF Inc.'s Class A Preferred Shares, senior unsecured debentures, and subordinated unsecured debentures are rated by independent rating agencies. Security ratings assigned to securities by the rating agencies may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the applicable rating agency and are not a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell these securities as such ratings do not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor. Security ratings are intended to provide investors with an independent measure of the credit quality of an issue of securities.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 13
Annual Information Form 2021
The table below provides the security ratings for SLF Inc.'s securities as at February 9, 2022. All rating agencies currently have stable outlooks on SLF Inc. issuer credit ratings:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security Ratings | | |
| A.M. Best(1) | DBRS(2) | Fitch(3) | Moody's(4) | S&P(5) |
| Rating | Rank | Rating | Rank | Rating | Rank | Rating | Rank | Rating | Rank |
| Subordinated Unsecured Debentures: | | | | | | | | | | |
Series 2007-1, 2016-2, 2017-1, 2019-1, 2020-1, 2020-2, 2021-1, 2021-2 and 2021-3 | a- | 7 of 21 | A | 6 of 26 | A- | 7 of 21 | NR(6) | - | A | 6 of 22 |
| Limited Recourse Capital Notes ("LRCNs"): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series 2021-1 | NR(6) | - | A (low) | 7 of 26 | BBB | 9 of 21 | NR(6) | - | A- | 7 of 22 |
Class A Preferred Shares: Series 3 - 5, 8R, 9QR, 10R, and 11QR | bbb+ | 8 of 21 | Pfd-2 (high) | 4 of 16 | BBB | 9 of 21 | NR(6) | - |
P-1(low) /A-(7) |
3 of 18/ 5 of 207 |
(1) A.M. Best Company, Inc.
(2) DBRS Limited, part of DBRS Morningstar group, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc.
(3) Fitch Ratings, Inc., part of Fitch Group, is majority owned by Hearst. We do not participate in Fitch’s ratings process, or provide additional information to Fitch Ratings, beyond our available public disclosures.
(4) Moody's Investors Service, a subsidiary of Moody's Corporation (NYSE: MCO).
(5) S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI).
(6) Not Rated.
(7) The Canadian scale rating/global scale rating for preferred shares.
SLF Inc. has made payments in the ordinary course to DBRS and Standard and Poor's ("S&P") in connection with the assignment of ratings on the securities of SLF Inc. In addition, SLF Inc. has made customary payments to A.M. Best, DBRS, Moody’s and Standard and Poor's ("S&P") in respect of certain other services provided to SLF Inc. by the applicable rating agencies during the last two years.
The descriptions of the ratings below are sourced from public information as disclosed by each rating agency.
A.M. Best
A.M. Best’s issue credit rating (“IR”) provides an opinion of credit quality assigned to issues that gauges the ability to meet the terms of the obligations and can be issued on a long- or short-term basis. An IR assigned to a specific issue is A.M. Best’s opinion of the issuer’s ability to meet the ongoing financial obligations to security holders when due. As such, an IR is an opinion regarding the relative future credit risk. Credit risk is the risk that a debt issuer may not meet its contractual financial obligations as they come due. The rating does not address any other risk, including, but not limited to, liquidity risk, market value risk or price volatility of rated obligations.
A.M. Best assigns long-term IR in a range from “aaa” to “c”. Ratings from “aa” to “ccc” may be enhanced with a “+” (plus) or “-” (minus) to indicate whether credit quality is near the top or bottom of a category. The absence of either a plus or minus designation indicates the rating is in the middle of the category.
SLF Inc.’s Subordinated Unsecured Debentures have been assigned “a-“ ratings. An “a” rating denotes an issuer’s excellent ability to meet the terms of the obligation.
SLF Inc.’s Class A Preferred Shares have been assigned “bbb+” ratings. A “bbb” rating denotes an issuer’s good ability to meet the terms of the obligation, however, the issue is more susceptible to changes in economic and other conditions.
DBRS
The DBRS long-term rating scale provides an opinion on the risk of default. That is, the risk that an issuer will fail to satisfy its financial obligations in accordance with the terms under which an obligation has been issued. Ratings are based on quantitative and qualitative considerations relevant to the issuer, and the relative ranking of claims. DBRS assigns long-term ratings in a range from AAA to D, and “(high)” and “(low)” designations indicate standing within the major rating categories. The absence of either a "(high)" or "(low)" designation indicates the rating is in the middle of the category. There are no "(high)" or "(low)" designations for AAA and D ratings.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 14
Annual Information Form 2021
SLF Inc.’s Subordinated Unsecured Debentures and LRCNs have been assigned A and A (low) ratings, respectively. A ratings, reflecting a good credit quality, are assigned to issues when the capacity for the payment of financial obligations is substantial, but of lesser credit quality than AA, and the issue may be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable.
DBRS assigns ratings for preferred shares in a range from Pfd-1 to D. Reference to “high” and “low” designations indicate standing within the major rating categories. The absence of either a "(high)" or "(low)" designation indicates the rating is in the middle of the category. There are no "(high)" or "(low)" designations for D ratings. The DBRS preferred share rating scale is used in the Canadian securities market and is meant to give an indication of the risk that a borrower will not fulfill its full obligations in a timely manner, with respect to both dividend and principal commitments. SLF Inc.’s Class A Preferred Shares have been assigned a Pfd-2 (high) rating, the second highest among rating categories used by DBRS. Preferred shares rated Pfd-2 are generally of good credit quality. Protection of dividends and principal is still substantial, but earnings, the balance sheet and coverage ratios are not as strong as Pfd-1 rated companies.
Fitch
Fitch’s ratings of individual securities or financial obligations of a corporate issuer address relative vulnerability to default on an ordinal scale.
Fitch assigns long-term ratings for debt and preferred shares in a range from AAA to C. The modifiers + or - may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories. The absence of either a plus or minus designation indicates the rating is in the middle of the category. Such modifiers are not added to the AAA rating or to ratings below CCC.
SLF Inc.’s Subordinated Unsecured Debentures have been assigned A- ratings. An A rating denotes expectations of low credit risk and the capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings. SLF Inc.’s LRCNs and Class A Preferred Shares have been assigned a BBB rating. A BBB rating indicates that expectations of credit risk are currently low and the capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.
Moody's
Moody's long-term obligation ratings are forward-looking opinions of the relative credit risk of financial obligations with an original maturity of one year or more. They address the possibility that a financial obligation will not be honoured as promised. Such ratings reflect both the likelihood of default and any financial loss suffered in the event of default.
Moody’s assigns long-term obligation ratings in a range from Aaa to C. Moody's appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category. Additionally, a “(hyb)” indicator is appended to all ratings of hybrid securities.
SLF Inc.’s securities are currently not rated by Moody's.
Standard & Poor's
An S&P issue credit rating is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation. The opinion reflects S&P's view of the obligor's capacity and willingness to meet its financial commitments as they come due, and may assess terms, such as collateral security and subordination, which could affect ultimate payment in the event of default.
S&P’s long-term credit ratings for securities are based, in varying degrees, on S&P's analysis of the following considerations:
•Likelihood of payment - capacity and willingness of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on an obligation in accordance with the terms of the obligation;
•Nature of and provisions of the obligation and the promise imputed by S&P; and
•The protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors' rights.
These ratings are an assessment of default risk, but may incorporate an assessment of relative seniority or ultimate recovery in the event of default. Junior obligations are typically rated lower than senior obligations, to reflect the lower priority in bankruptcy.
S&P assigns long-term ratings in a range from AAA to D. The ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories. The absence of either a plus or minus designation indicates the rating is in the middle of the category.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 15
Annual Information Form 2021
SLF Inc.’s Subordinated Unsecured Debentures and LRCNs have been assigned A and A- ratings, respectively. An A rating category indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong.
S&P has Canadian and global rating scales for preferred shares. S&P assigns ratings for Canadian preferred shares in a range from P-1 to D on the Canadian scale and from AA to D on the global rating scale. S&P uses “high” and “low” designations to indicate standing within the major rating categories on the Canadian rating scale and plus or minus designations to indicate the relative standing of securities within a particular rating category on the global rating scale. The absence of either a “high” and “low” or a plus or minus designation indicates the rating is in the middle of the category. There are no plus and minus or “high” and “low” designations for CC, C and D ratings, and no plus designation for an AA rating category.
S&P’s preferred share rating on the Canadian scale is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific preferred share obligation issued in the Canadian market, relative to preferred shares issued by other issuers in the Canadian market. There is a direct correspondence between the specific ratings assigned on the Canadian preferred share scale and the various rating levels on the global debt rating scale of Standard & Poor's. S&P presents an issuer's preferred share ratings on both the global rating scale and on the Canadian national scale when listing the ratings for a particular issuer.
SLF Inc.’s Class A Preferred Shares have been assigned a P-1 (low) rating on the Canadian scale, which corresponds to an A- rating on the global scale. An A rating category indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong.
Transfer Agents and Registrars
Common Shares
TSX Trust Company is the principal transfer agent and the registrar for SLF Inc.'s Common Shares. The central securities register is maintained in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The transfer agent and co-transfer agents for SLF Inc.’s Common Shares are as follows (opposite their applicable jurisdictions):
| | | | | |
| Transfer Agent |
| Canada | TSX Trust Company 1 Toronto Street, Suite 1200 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5C 2V6 |
| Co-Transfer Agents | |
| United States | American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC 6201 15th Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11219 United States |
| United Kingdom | Link Asset Services 10th Floor, Central Square 29 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 4DL United Kingdom |
| Philippines | Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation RCBC Stock Transfer Processing Section Ground Floor, West Wing GPL (Grepalife) Building 221 Senator Gil Puyat Avenue Makati City, Philippines |
| Hong Kong | Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited 17M Floor, Hopewell Centre 183 Queen's Road East Wanchai, Hong Kong |
Preferred Shares and Debentures
TSX Trust Company is the transfer agent and the registrar for SLF Inc.'s Class A Preferred Shares, and BNY Trust Company of Canada is the trustee and the registrar for SLF Inc.'s senior unsecured debentures, and its subordinated unsecured debentures, Series 2007-1, 2016-2, 2017-1, 2019-1, 2020-1, 2020-2, 2021-1, 2021-2 and 2021-3. Computershare Trust Company of Canada is the trustee and registrar for SLF Inc.'s LRCNs. The registers for those securities are maintained in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 16
Annual Information Form 2021
Directors and Executive Officers
Board of Directors
As of the date of this AIF, the Board of SLF Inc. had four standing committees: Audit Committee, Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee, Management Resources Committee and Risk Committee.
The following table sets out the directors of SLF Inc. as of the date of this AIF and, for each director, the province or state and country of his or her residence, principal occupation, years as a director, and membership on Board committees. The term of each director expires at the close of business of the Annual Meeting in 2022. Each director of SLF Inc. is an independent director as defined in the Company's Director Independence Policy, except Mr. Strain, the President & Chief Executive Officer of SLF Inc.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Province/State and Country of Residence | Principal Occupation | Director Since | Board Committee Membership |
William D. Anderson Ontario, Canada | Chair of the Board, SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance | 2010 | None |
Deepak Chopra Ontario, Canada | Corporate Director | 2021 | Audit Governance, Investment & Conduct Review |
Stephanie L. Coyles Ontario, Canada | Corporate Director | 2017 | Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Management Resources |
Martin J. G. Glynn British Columbia, Canada | Corporate Director | 2010 | Management Resources Risk |
Ashok K. Gupta London, England | Corporate Director | 2018 | Management Resources Risk |
M. Marianne Harris Ontario, Canada | Corporate Director | 2013 | Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Management Resources |
Helen M. Mallovy Hicks Ontario, Canada | Corporate Director | 2021 | Audit Risk |
David H. Y. Ho Chongqing, China | Chairman and Founder, Kiina Investment Limited | 2021 | Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Management Resources |
Marie-Lucie Morin Ontario, Canada | Corporate Director | 2021 | Management Resources Risk |
Scott F. Powers Massachusetts, U.S.A. | Corporate Director | 2015 | Audit Governance, Investment & Conduct Review |
Kevin D. Strain Ontario, Canada | President & Chief Executive Officer, SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance | 2021 | None |
Barbara G. Stymiest Ontario, Canada | Corporate Director | 2012 | Audit Risk |
Each director of SLF Inc. has been engaged for more than five years in his or her present principal occupation or in other capacities with the company or organization (or predecessor thereof) in which he or she currently holds his or her principal occupation, except:
(i)Mr. Chopra, who from 2011 to 2018 was President and Chief Executive Officer, Canada Post Corporation;
(ii)Ms. Mallovy Hicks, who from 1999 to June 2021 held various executive positions at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, including most recently as Global Valuation Business Line Leader; and
(iii)Mr. Ho, who from 2010 to 2018 was a senior advisor, Permira Advisors LLC, and from 2017 to 2019 was Chairman and founding partner, CRU Capital.
Audit Committee
The responsibilities and duties of the Audit Committee are set out in its charter, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A. The Board has determined that each member of its Audit Committee is independent as defined in the Company's Director Independence Policy and is financially literate. In the Board's judgment, a member of the Committee is financially literate if, after seeking and receiving any explanations or information from senior financial management of the Company or the auditors of the Company that the member requires, the member is able to read and understand the consolidated financial statements of the Company to the extent sufficient to be able to intelligently ask, and to evaluate the answers to, probing questions about the material aspects of those financial statements.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 17
Annual Information Form 2021
The members of the Audit Committee as of the date of this AIF and their qualifications and education are set out below:
Barbara G. Stymiest (Chair), is a corporate director and a Chartered Professional Accountant. She was a member of the Group Executive at Royal Bank of Canada, an international banking and financial services organization, from 2004 to 2011; Royal Bank’s Group Head, Strategy, Treasury and Corporate Services from 2010 to 2011; and Chief Operating Officer from 2004 to 2009. Prior to that Ms. Stymiest held senior positions in the financial services sector including Chief Executive Officer, TSX Group Inc., Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, BMO Nesbitt Burns, and Partner, Financial Services Group, Ernst & Young LLP. She joined the Board, and the Risk Committee (formerly the Risk Review Committee) of SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance in May 2012. Ms. Stymiest was a member of the Management Resources Committee from her appointment until May 2015. She became a member of the Audit Committee (formerly the Audit & Conduct Review Committee) and Chair of the Risk Committee (formerly the Risk Review Committee) in May 2015. Ms. Stymiest ceased to be Chair of the Risk Committee and became Chair of the Audit Committee in May 2021. She is a Fellow of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario and received an Award of Outstanding Merit from that organization in 2011. Ms. Stymiest is a director and Chair of the audit committee of George Weston Limited. She is a director of BlackBerry Limited and was Chair of its audit and risk management committee from 2007 to September 2021. She also serves as a director of President’s Choice Bank, a director of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, the Vice Chair of University Health Network, the Vice-Chair of AGE-WELL NCE Inc. and Chair of its finance & audit committee. Ms. Stymiest holds an Honours Business Administration degree. Ms. Stymiest was named to the National Association of Corporate Directors ("NACD") Directorship 100 in 2018 and became a member of the Order of Canada in 2021.
Deepak Chopra is a corporate director and most recently served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Canada Post Corporation from 2011 to 2018. He has more than 30 years of global experience in the financial services, technology, logistics and supply-chain industries. Prior to joining Canada Post, he held various senior positions during his 23-year career with Pitney Bowes Inc., a NYSE-traded technology company known for postage meters, mail automation and location intelligence services, including President & Chief Executive Officer, Canada & Latin America, President, Asia Pacific & Middle East and Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer, Europe, Africa & Middle East. Mr. Chopra joined the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee and the Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee of Sun Life Financial Inc. and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada in May 2021. He is currently a director and a member of the audit committee of Celestica Inc., a director and a member of the audit committee of The Descartes Systems Group Inc. and a director of The North West Company Inc. Mr. Chopra has previously served on the boards of Canada Post Corporation, Purolator Inc., SCI Group, the Canada Post Community Foundation, the Toronto Region Board of Trade and the Conference Board of Canada. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada and holds a Bachelor’s degree in Commerce (Honours) and a Post Graduate Diploma in Business Management ("PGDBM").
Helen M. Mallovy Hicks is a corporate director. Prior to her retirement in June 2021, she was a partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) with over 30 years of global business management and advisory experience. She most recently served as PwC’s Global Valuation Business Line Leader from 2016 to 2021 and prior to that held various executive positions, including, Canada GTA Deals Leader, Canada Valuation Leader and Deals Valuation Partner. She has advised boards and executives on complex transactions, value creation, capital allocation, business transformation and restructuring matters. Ms. Mallovy Hicks joined the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee of Sun Life Financial Inc. and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada in October 2021. She is currently a director and member of the audit committee of Northland Power Inc., a director and Chair of the audit & risk committee of The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation, a director and Chair of the finance audit & risk committee of Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, and a trustee of Toronto Symphony Foundation. Ms. Mallovy Hicks has previously served on the Canadian Partnership Board of PwC and the board of the Toronto Symphony Orchestra. She is a Fellow of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Business Valuators ("FCBV") and a Fellow of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario (FCA/FCPA) and holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree.
Scott F. Powers is a corporate director. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of State Street Global Advisors until his retirement in 2015. Before joining State Street in 2008, Mr. Powers was President and Chief Executive Officer of Old Mutual Asset Management Plc, the U.S.-based global asset management business of Old Mutual plc. Prior to 2008, he held senior executive positions at Mellon Institutional Asset Management, BNY Mellon’s investment management business, and at The Boston Company Asset Management, LLC. Mr. Powers joined the Board, the Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee (formerly the Governance, Nomination & Investment Committee) and the Management Resources Committee of SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance in October 2015, and became the Chair of the Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee (formerly the Governance, Nomination & Investment Committee) in May 2017. He ceased to be a member of the Management Resources Committee and became a member of the Audit Committee in September 2020. Mr. Powers currently serves on the board of PulteGroup, Inc. He is also a director of Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and was previously a member of its audit committee from 2018 to 2020. Mr. Powers has served as a member of the Systemic Risk Council and the Advisory Board of the U.S. Institute of Institutional Investors. On December 9, 2021, Mr. Powers was appointed to succeed Mr. Anderson as Chair of the Board following the annual meeting of common shareholders on May 11, 2022, subject to being re-elected by the common shareholders at that meeting.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 18
Annual Information Form 2021
SLF Inc.'s Board has determined that Helen M. Mallovy Hicks and Barbara G. Stymiest are the Audit Committee Financial Experts as defined by the SEC. The SEC has indicated that the designation of a person as an Audit Committee Financial Expert does not make that person an “expert” for any purpose, or impose any duties, obligations or liabilities on that person that are greater than those imposed on members of the audit committee and the Board who do not carry this designation or affect the duties, obligations or liabilities of any other member of the Audit Committee or the Board. Each of Ms. Mallovy Hicks and Ms. Stymiest is “independent” within the meaning of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and Rule 10A-3 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Executive Officers
The following table sets out the executive officers of SLF Inc. as of the date of this AIF:
| | | | | | | | |
| Name | Province/State and Country of Residence | Position |
| Kevin D. Strain | Ontario, Canada | President & Chief Executive Officer |
| Manjit Singh | Ontario, Canada | Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer |
| Linda M. Dougherty | Ontario, Canada | Executive Vice-President, Corporate Strategy and Global Marketing |
| Daniel R. Fishbein | Maine, USA | President, Sun Life U.S. |
| Colm J. Freyne | Ontario, Canada | Executive Vice-President & Chief Risk Officer |
| Jacques Goulet | Ontario, Canada | President, Sun Life Canada |
| Ingrid G. Johnson | Hong Kong, China | President, Sun Life Asia |
| Melissa J. Kennedy | Ontario, Canada | Executive Vice-President, Chief Legal Officer & Public Affairs |
| Laura A. Money | Ontario, Canada | Executive Vice-President & Chief Information Officer |
| Helena J. Pagano | Ontario, Canada | Executive Vice-President, Chief Human Resources & Communications Officer |
| Stephen C. Peacher | Massachusetts, USA | President, SLC Management |
Each executive officer of SLF Inc. has held his or her current position or other senior positions with the Company during the past five years with the following exceptions:
(i)Prior to December 2017, Mr. Goulet was President, Health and Wealth, Mercer (U.S.) Inc.;
(ii)Prior to June 2018, Ms. Johnson was Group Finance Director, Old Mutual plc;
(iii)Ms. Money held the following positions with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce: Senior Vice-President and Chief Information Officer Corporate Centre Technology, from November 2018 to May 2020 and Senior Vice President, Enterprise Programs & Deliver Excellence, from April 2016 to October 2018; and
(iv)Mr. Singh held the following positions with The Toronto-Dominion Bank: Executive Vice President, Finance, Enterprise Finance, TD Bank Group, from August 2019 to March 2021 and Executive Vice President, TD Bank Group and Chief Financial Officer, TD Bank, from June 2015 to August 2019.
Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties and Sanctions
To the best of SLF Inc.’s knowledge, as at the date of this AIF, except as set out below, no director or executive officer of SLF Inc.:
(i)is or has been, in the last ten years, a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of a company (including SLF Inc.) that, while that person was acting in that capacity,
(a) was the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the company access to any exemption under Canadian securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, or
(b) was subject to an event that resulted, after that person ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer, in the company being the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the company access to any exemption under Canadian securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days.
(ii) is or has been, in the last ten years, a director or executive officer of a company (including SLF Inc.) that, while that person was acting in that capacity or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets,
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 19
Annual Information Form 2021
(iii) has, within the last ten years, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director or executive officer; and
(iv) has been subject to (a) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities
regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority or (b) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.
Ms. Coyles was a director of Postmedia Network Canada Corp. while it completed a restructuring following an arrangement plan under the Canada Business Corporation Act in October 2016. Ms. Coyles is no longer a director of Postmedia Network Canada Corp.
Shareholdings of Directors and Executive Officers
To the knowledge of SLF Inc., as at December 31, 2021, SLF Inc.'s directors and executive officers, as a group, owned, directly or indirectly, or had voting control or direction over 128,597 Common Shares of SLF Inc., or less than 1% of the total Common Shares outstanding.
Code of Conduct
We have built a strong corporate culture founded on ethical behaviour, high business standards, integrity and respect. The Board establishes the “tone from the top” and makes every effort to ensure that Senior Management consists of people of integrity who create and sustain a culture of integrity throughout the organization. Questions about integrity are included in our Board's, committee and peer effectiveness surveys.
The Board has established our Code of Conduct (the "Code") that applies to every Director, Officer and employee, with no exception. Each Director, Officer and employee receives annual training and is required to complete a declaration of compliance with the Code. Our Code promotes speaking up and outlines our commitment against retaliation.
Our Code also requires employees and Board members to report all known and suspected breaches. Our Ethics Hotline empowers our employees to play an active role in protecting the organization. They may use the Ethics Hotline to report allegations of misconduct anonymously or if they feel their concerns have not been resolved using other reporting methods.
Communications that accompanied the Code in 2021 continued to reinforce our expectations of behaviours in the workplace; emphasizing the importance of speaking up, fostering a workplace that is free of harassment of any kind and promoting diversity, equity and inclusion.
The Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee of the Board is responsible for reviewing the effectiveness of the Code, monitoring compliance with the Code and reporting the results of its review to the Board annually. On a quarterly basis, the Chief Compliance Officer reports on breaches of the Code and reviews our controls and compliance with the Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee. No waivers of the Code for Directors or Executive Officers have been granted.
The most recent copy of the Code is available on our website (www.sunlife.com). It has been filed with securities regulators in Canada and with the SEC and may be accessed at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following table shows the fees related to services provided by the Company's external auditors, Deloitte LLP, for the past two years:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
For the years ended December 31 ($ millions)
| | 2021 | 2020(1) |
| | | |
| Audit Services | | 19.3 | 19.6 |
| Audit-Related Services | | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| Tax Services | | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Other Services | | 0.2 | 1.5 |
|
(1) Adjustments to 2020 fee of $0.8 for Audit Services and ($0.2) for Tax Services.
Audit fees relate to professional services rendered by the auditors for the audit of our Annual Consolidated Financial Statements, the statements for our segregated funds and services related to statutory and regulatory filings. Audit fees of $13.0 million (2020: $12.7 million) relates to the audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements of SLF and its subsidiaries to support the audit opinions expressed in the Independent Auditor's Report; the remaining Audit Services fees of $6.2 million (2020: $6.9 million) relates to audit of the statements of segregated funds and statutory and regulatory filings.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 20
Annual Information Form 2021
Audit-related fees include assurance services not directly related to performing the audit of the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. These include internal control reviews, specified procedure audits and employee benefit plan audits.
Tax fees relate to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All other fees relate to products and services other than audit, audit-related and tax as described above.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee of SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance have adopted a policy restricting the use of the external auditor (the “Policy”). The objective of the Policy is to ensure that the independence of the external auditor is not compromised by certain engagements. The Policy is based on the following principles, which specify that the external auditor cannot:
•function in the role of management of the Company;
•audit its own firm’s work; or
•serve in an advocacy role for the Company.
The Policy requires that any services to be provided by the external auditor be pre-approved by the Audit Committees of SLF Inc. and/or Sun Life Assurance, as applicable, and the audit committee of any affected subsidiary that is itself directly subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If a service has not been pre-approved by the Audit Committee, specific approval must be obtained from the committee before an engagement letter can be issued and the related work commenced. The committee has, subject to reporting requirements, pre-approved certain audit, audit-related and other permissible non-audit services that are consistent with maintaining the independence of the external auditor. These pre-approved services are reviewed annually by the committee. The Policy prohibits engaging the external auditor to provide certain services, including:
•bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements;
•financial information systems design or implementation services;
•appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution in kind reports;
•actuarial services;
•internal audit outsourcing services;
•management functions or human resources services;
•broker or dealer, investment adviser, underwriting, securities or investment banking services;
•legal services and expert services unrelated to an audit;
•any service for which no fee is payable unless a specific result is obtained;
•any non-audit tax services that recommend the Company engage in confidential transactions or aggressive tax position transactions, as defined by the U.S. Public Company Accountability Oversight Board; and
•any other service that governing regulators or professional bodies determine to be impermissible.
Fees paid to SLF Inc.'s external auditors have been approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of SLF Inc. or otherwise in accordance with the Policy. None of the services provided by the Company's external auditors described above were approved pursuant to a waiver of pre-approval provisions under SEC rules (paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2 - 01 of Regulation S-X).
Interests of Experts
Deloitte LLP is the auditor of SLF Inc. and is independent of SLF Inc. within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario and within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the applicable rules and regulations thereunder adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)("PCAOB").
Kevin Morrissey, the Appointed Actuary of SLF Inc., has provided an opinion on the value of policy liabilities and reinsurance recoverables for SLF Inc.'s statements of financial position as at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the change in the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Mr. Morrissey owned beneficially, directly or indirectly, less than 1% of all outstanding securities or other property of SLF Inc. or its affiliates when he prepared that opinion, and after that opinion was prepared, and he does not expect to receive any such securities or other property in excess of that amount in the future.
Regulatory Matters
Sun Life is subject to regulation and supervision by government authorities in the jurisdictions in which it does business.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 as a pandemic. In the early days of the pandemic, various regulators introduced new measures or adjustments to respond to the evolving situation with the COVID-19 pandemic. Information on the impact of COVID-19 and certain other regulatory developments affecting Sun Life are described in our 2021 MD&A under the heading "COVID-19" and is incorporated herein by reference.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 21
Annual Information Form 2021
Canada
Regulation of Insurance Operations
SLF Inc. is incorporated under and governed by the Insurance Act. OSFI administers the Insurance Act and supervises the activities of SLF Inc. SLF Inc. has all the powers and restrictions applicable to life insurance companies governed by the Insurance Act, which permits insurance companies to offer, directly or through subsidiaries or networking arrangements, a broad range of financial services, including:
•Insurance and reinsurance;
•Investment counselling and portfolio management;
•Mutual funds and segregated funds;
•Trust services;
•Banking services;
•Real property brokerage and appraisal; and
•Merchant banking services.
The Insurance Act requires the filing of annual and other reports on the financial condition of insurance companies, provides for periodic examinations of insurance companies' affairs, imposes restrictions on transactions with related parties, and sets out requirements governing certain aspects of insurance companies' businesses.
OSFI supervises SLF Inc. on a consolidated basis to ensure that it has an overview of activities of SLF Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. This consolidated supervision includes the ability to review insurance and non-insurance operations of SLF Inc. and subsidiaries and supervisory power to bring about corrective action. OSFI has extensive powers to intervene in the affairs of regulated insurance companies, including the power to request information or documents, to conduct investigations, to require that appropriate actions are taken to address issues identified by OSFI and to levy fines. OSFI may intervene and assume control of an insurance company governed by the Insurance Act if OSFI deems that the amount of the company’s available capital is not sufficient.
Investment Powers
Under the Insurance Act, a life insurance company must maintain a prudent portfolio of investments, subject to certain overall limitations on the amount it may invest in certain classes of investments, such as commercial loans, real estate and stocks. Additional restrictions (and, in some cases, the need for regulatory approvals) limit the type of investments which SLF Inc. can make in excess of 10% of the voting rights or 25% of the equity of any entity.
Capital and Surplus Requirements
SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance, SLF Inc.’s principal operating life insurance subsidiary in Canada, are subject to OSFI’s Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test ("LICAT") capital framework.
The LICAT Guideline uses a risk-based approach for measuring specific life insurer risks and for aggregating the results to calculate the amount of a life insurer’s regulatory required capital to support these risks. LICAT measures the capital adequacy of an insurer using a Total Ratio and a Core Ratio and is one of several indicators used by OSFI to assess an insurer’s financial condition. The Total Ratio is the Available Capital plus Surplus Allowance and Eligible Deposits divided by a Base Solvency Buffer as described below.
The principal elements included in determining Qualifying Regulatory Available Capital (“Available Capital”) under LICAT include common shares, contributed surplus, retained earnings, the participating account, accumulated currency translation account, unrealized gains and losses on available for sale equity and debt securities, qualifying preferred shares, innovative capital instruments and subordinated debt.
The calculation of the Total Ratio takes into consideration other aspects of the balance sheet that are available as loss absorbing capacity, including the Surplus Allowance and Eligible Deposits. The Surplus Allowance includes the provisions for adverse deviations for non-economic and risk-free interest rate assumptions. The Eligible Deposits consist of the excess deposits held for unregistered reinsurers and claims fluctuation reserves.
The Base Solvency Buffer includes five risk components: (1) credit risk, (2) market risk, (3) insurance risk, (4) segregated funds guarantee risk, and (5) operational risk. Credits are available for: (1) qualifying in-force participating and adjustable products, (2) other risk mitigation and risk transfer, and (3) risk diversification. The sum of the risk components, net of credits, are multiplied by 1.05 to arrive at the Base Solvency Buffer.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 22
Annual Information Form 2021
The LICAT Guideline sets a Supervisory Target Total Ratio of 100% and a minimum Total Ratio of 90%. The supervisory target provides a cushion above the minimum requirements, provides a margin for other risks, and facilitates OSFI’s early intervention process. The supervisory target is not applicable to regulated insurance holding companies and non-operating insurance companies. The Company has established capital targets in excess of the supervisory target set by OSFI.
Restrictions on Dividends and Capital Transactions
The Insurance Act prohibits the declaration or payment of dividends on shares of an insurance company if there are reasonable grounds for believing the company does not have, or the payment of the dividend would cause the company not to have, adequate capital or liquidity, or upon any direction made by the Superintendent. The Insurance Act also requires that an insurance company notify the Superintendent of the declaration of a dividend at least fifteen days before the dividend payment date.
The Insurance Act also prohibits the purchase for cancellation of shares issued by an insurance company or the redemption of redeemable shares or other similar capital transactions, if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the company does not have, or the payment would cause the company not to have, adequate capital or liquidity, or upon any direction made by the Superintendent. Further, any redemption or purchase for cancellation of shares issued by an insurance company or similar capital transactions are prohibited without the prior approval of the Superintendent.
On March 13, 2020, OSFI set the expectation for all federally regulated financial institutions that dividend increases and share buybacks should be halted for the time being. On November 4, 2021, OSFI removed these restrictions.
Restrictions on Ownership
The Insurance Act contains restrictions on the purchase or other acquisition, issue, transfer and voting of the shares of an insurance company. Pursuant to these restrictions:
•No person is permitted to acquire any shares of SLF Inc. if the acquisition would cause the person to have a “significant interest” in any class of shares of SLF Inc., without the prior approval of the Minister of Finance of Canada;
•SLF Inc. is not permitted to record any transfer or issue of shares of SLF Inc. if the transfer or issue would cause the person to have a significant interest in SLF Inc., unless prior approval is obtained from the Minister of Finance of Canada; and
•No person who has a significant interest in SLF Inc. may exercise any voting rights attached to the shares held by that person, unless prior approval of the Minister of Finance of Canada is obtained.
A person has a significant interest in a class of shares where the aggregate of any shares of that class beneficially owned by that person, any entity controlled by that person and any person acting jointly or in concert with that person exceeds 10% of all of the outstanding shares of that class of shares.
Under the Insurance Act, the Minister of Finance of Canada may approve only the acquisition of a significant interest of up to 30% of any class of non-voting shares and up to 20% of a class of voting shares, provided that the person acquiring those shares does not have direct or indirect influence over SLF Inc. that, if exercised, would result in that person having control in fact of SLF Inc. In addition, the Insurance Act prohibits life insurance companies, including SLF Inc., from recording a transfer or issuing shares of any class to Her Majesty in right of Canada or of a province, an agent of Her Majesty, a foreign government or an agent of a foreign government.
SLF Inc. is required to continue to control, but not wholly own, Sun Life Assurance. Any shares of Sun Life Assurance that are not owned by SLF Inc. are required to meet the widely-held criteria (no individual may own more than 10% of any class of shares without prior approval of the Minister of Finance of Canada). The 20% limit on voting share ownership and 30% limit on non-voting share ownership apply to the direct and indirect cumulative ownership of Sun Life Assurance, with the effect that no single investor will be able to use the holding company structure to exceed those ownership restrictions.
Appointed Actuary
In accordance with the Insurance Act, SLF Inc.'s Board has appointed a Fellow of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries as its “Appointed Actuary”. The Appointed Actuary must provide an opinion on:
•The value of the Company's consolidated policy liabilities as at the end of each fiscal period in accordance with accepted actuarial practice, including the selection of appropriate assumptions and methods;
•Whether the amount of policy liabilities makes appropriate provisions for all obligations to policyholders; and
•Whether the valuation of liabilities is fairly presented in the consolidated financial statements.
Regulations require that the Appointed Actuary meet with the Board or a delegated Committee of the Board at least once in each financial year to report, in accordance with accepted actuarial practice, on the Company's financial position and its expected future financial condition. The Appointed Actuary must report to the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of SLF Inc. any matters that, in the Appointed Actuary's opinion, could have material adverse effects on the financial condition of SLF Inc.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 23
Annual Information Form 2021
Prescribed Supervisory Information
The Supervisory Information (Insurance Companies) Regulations made under the Insurance Act prohibit regulated insurance companies, such as SLF Inc. and Sun Life Assurance, from disclosing, directly or indirectly, “prescribed supervisory information”, as defined in those Regulations. Prescribed supervisory information includes assessments, recommendations, ratings and reports concerning a company made by or at the request of the Superintendent, orders of the Superintendent with respect to capital and liquidity, certain regulatory actions taken with respect to a company, prudential agreements between a company and the Superintendent, and directions of the Superintendent that a company cease or refrain from committing, or remedy, unsafe or unsound practices in conducting its business.
Provincial/Territorial Insurance Regulation
In Canada, life insurance is also subject to provincial/territorial regulation and supervision in each province and territory in Canada. Provincial/territorial insurance regulation is primarily concerned with market conduct matters, the rights and obligations under insurance contracts, and the licensing and oversight of insurance intermediaries. In addition to those regulations, guidelines adopted by the Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association (“CLHIA”) govern several aspects of our business in Canada.
SLF Inc. is licensed as an insurance company in Canada under the Insurance Act and is the holding company for the Sun Life group of companies. SLF Inc. is not licensed to carry on life insurance business in any province or territory in Canada.
Sun Life Assurance and Sun Life Insurance (Canada) Limited are licensed to carry on life insurance and accident and sickness insurance business in each province and territory in Canada.
Regulation of Securities Operations
Several of SLF Inc.'s subsidiaries in Canada are registered with various Canadian Securities Administrators as dealers, advisors or managers under one or more of the following categories of registration: mutual fund dealer, investment fund manager, commodity trading manager, investment counsel/portfolio manager and exempt market dealer. These entities, their registered employees and their products and/or services are regulated in Canada under provincial and territorial securities laws which are administered and enforced by the various Canadian Securities Administrators, and certain entities are also subject to the rules of the applicable self-regulatory organization, such as the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada for mutual fund dealers. These entities may be subject to examinations or proceedings by the various Canadian Securities Administrators and self-regulatory organizations. These examinations or proceedings could subject our registered subsidiaries to a range of regulatory sanctions, including censure, limitations on the registrant's activities, and termination of registration, and could subject these entities to a cessation of sales or the rescission of a sale of securities.
Client Protection for Financial Institution Failure
Sun Life Assurance’s Canadian policyholders are provided protection from an insolvency through Assuris, a not for profit organization that is funded by its member insurance companies. Every life insurance company authorized to sell insurance policies in Canada is required, by the federal, provincial and territorial regulators, to become a member of Assuris. Assuris provides separate protection for individual, group, registered and non-registered, life insurance policies and annuity policies.
The MFDA Investor Protection Corporation (“IPC”) provides Clients with protection, within defined limits, in the event of the insolvency of their mutual fund dealer. The IPC is funded by its member mutual fund dealers, including Sun Life Financial Investment Services (Canada) Inc.
The Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (“CDIC”) is a federal crown corporation created to protect deposits made with member financial institutions in case of their failure. CDIC member institutions, including Sun Life Financial Trust Inc., fund deposit insurance through premiums paid on the insured deposits that they hold.
Other Regulatory Matters
Privacy of Client Information and Anti-Spam Legislation
Canadian federal, and some provincial, laws and regulations require organizations, including financial institutions, to protect the security and confidentiality of Client information. This includes financial institutions notifying Clients about their policies and practices relating to their collection, use and disclosure of Client information, including protection of that information. Requirements
also include an obligation to notify individuals and report to privacy regulators when there is a real risk of significant harm to affected individuals resulting from a breach of security safeguards. In 2021, the Quebec government passed legislation that will significantly alter privacy legislation by introducing new rights for individuals, additional obligations for organizations and expansive enforcement powers and financial penalties for non-compliance. The Quebec privacy legislation will come into force over the next three years with the majority of changes coming into force in September 2023. Canadian anti-spam legislation imposes certain restrictions and formalities on the delivery of commercial electronic messages to existing and prospective Clients. This includes obtaining consent from recipients and providing the ability to unsubscribe from subsequent messages.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 24
Annual Information Form 2021
Anti-Money Laundering Legislation
The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, Canada, contains measures to assist in detecting, deterring, and facilitating the investigation of money laundering and terrorist financing offences. This legislation and the associated regulations impose reporting, recordkeeping and “know your Client” obligations on SLF Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries.
Cybersecurity
In November, 2021, OSFI launched a public consultation for a draft guideline on Technology and Cyber Risk Management. The guideline would apply to all federally regulated financial institutions, including insurance companies, with the stated objective of helping institutions develop greater resilience to technology and cyber risks. Although the draft guideline is subject to further development after the public consultation, we expect there will be significant regulatory developments in this area and we are monitoring for potential impacts on our operations.
United States
In the U.S. SLF Inc. does not carry on business and is not regulated as an insurance company. Sun Life Assurance and several indirect U.S. subsidiaries of SLF Inc. carry on business and are regulated as insurance companies in the United States. Michigan is Sun Life Assurance's “state of entry” and is treated as the state of domicile for Sun Life Assurance's U.S. branch (the “U.S. Branch”). The U.S. Branch is licensed to transact business in every state in the United States except New York, plus in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries are, collectively, licensed to transact business in all states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
Some of SLF Inc.'s U.S. subsidiaries (including MFS and its subsidiaries; Sun Life Capital Management (U.S.) LLC; BGO and Crescent and certain of their respective subsidiaries; and some subsidiaries of InfraRed) and various contracts, policies and funds issued, offered or managed by them are subject to regulation under federal securities laws administered by the SEC and under certain state securities laws.
Regulation of Insurance Operations - State Level
In the United States, all states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. territories and possessions have insurance laws that apply to companies licensed to carry on an insurance business in the jurisdiction. The primary regulator of an insurance company, however, is the state insurance department or equivalent body located in its state of domicile. Most jurisdictions have laws and regulations governing the financial aspects of insurers, including standards of solvency, reserves, reinsurance, and capital adequacy, as well as the business conduct of insurers. In addition, the laws of the various states provide state insurance regulators with broad administrative powers to approve policy forms and related materials and approve rates for certain lines of insurance, grant and revoke licenses to transact business, regulate trade practices, license agents, and require statutory financial statements. The primary purpose of such regulation is the protection of policyholders and consumers, rather than shareholders.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) is the U.S. standard-setting and regulatory support organization created and governed by the chief insurance regulators from the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories. Through the NAIC, state insurance regulators establish standards and best practices, conduct peer review, and coordinate their regulatory oversight. NAIC members, together with the central resources of the NAIC, form the national system of state-based insurance regulation in the United States.
The U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries are subject to the insurance holding company laws and regulations in the states in which they are domiciled (or deemed to be commercially domiciled). Most states' insurance holding company laws require each insurer that is domiciled therein and that is a member of a holding company system to register with the insurance regulatory authority of that state and, annually, to furnish those authorities with reports that include information concerning capital structure, ownership, financial condition, certain intercompany transactions and general business operations. In addition, under most states' holding company laws, transactions within the holding company system to which the domestic insurer is a party must be fair and equitable and the insurer's policyholder surplus following any such transaction must be both reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate for its needs. Most states require prior regulatory approval of the change of control of the domestic insurer or an entity that controls the domestic insurer and prior notice or regulatory approval of certain intercompany transfers of assets or other material affiliate transactions to which a domestic insurer is a party. Generally, under such laws, a state insurance authority must approve in advance the direct or indirect acquisition of 10% or more of the voting securities of an insurance company domiciled in the state.
SLF Inc.'s U.S. captive insurance companies are subject to the laws and regulations applicable to captive insurers in their states of domicile, as well as the terms of the business plans approved by, and the licensing orders issued by, the companies' domestic regulators. Generally, a captive insurance company is required to seek regulatory approval prior to taking any action that would deviate from the activities described in its approved business plan or specifically permitted by the licensing order issued by its domestic regulator.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 25
Annual Information Form 2021
The U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries are required to file detailed annual and quarterly financial statements with state insurance regulators in each of the states in which they are licensed, and their business and accounts are subject to examination by such regulators at any time. Regulators have authority to limit or prohibit the ability to issue new policies if, in their judgment, an insurer is not maintaining sufficient surplus or capital or if the further transaction of business would be detrimental to policyholders.
As part of their oversight process, state insurance departments conduct detailed examinations periodically (generally, every three- to five-years) of the financial condition and market conduct of insurance companies domiciled in their states. The latest published examination reports of the U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance companies did not raise any material issues or adjustments. In addition to the periodic examinations, states will on occasion perform targeted market conduct reviews that may cover, among other things, content of disclosures, advertising, sales practices and complaint handling. Examinations are periodically conducted, in cooperation with the departments of other states, under guidelines published by the NAIC.
Restrictions on Dividends
The amount of dividends that an insurance company may pay to its parent without prior regulatory approval is regulated under the U.S. state insurance holding company laws and regulations and under the terms of licensing orders issued by various states.
NAIC IRIS Ratios
The NAIC has developed a set of financial relationships or “tests” known as the Insurance Regulatory Information System (“IRIS”) to assist state regulators in monitoring the financial condition of insurance companies and identifying companies that may require special attention or action by insurance regulatory authorities. A second set of confidential ratios, called the Financial Analysis Solvency Tracking System, is also used for monitoring. Insurance companies generally submit data to the NAIC, which in turn analyzes the data using prescribed financial data ratios, each with defined “usual ranges”. Having ratios that fall outside the usual range does not necessarily indicate that a company experienced unfavourable results. Generally, if four or more of an insurance company's ratios fall outside the usual ranges, regulators will begin to investigate or monitor the company. Regulators have the authority to impose remedies with various degrees of supervision, ranging from increased monitoring to certain business limitations. For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020, the most recent period for which results are available, SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries were within the usual ranges for most of the IRIS ratios. The U.S. Branch had five ratios outside of the usual ranges, which was anticipated in connection with certain planned transactions that were reported to or approved by state regulators as required. The ratios that were outside the usual ranges did not indicate any adverse solvency issues.
Risk-based Capital Ratio Requirements
All states have risk-based capital (“RBC”) ratio requirements for insurance companies. The NAIC RBC system was created to provide a capital adequacy standard that is related to risk, raises a safety net for insurers, is uniform among the states, and provides regulatory authority for timely action. The RBC system requires an insurer to calculate a minimum amount of capital that it must maintain to support the various risks to which it is exposed. A separate factor is used across each major risk category, and may vary by primary insurance type. RBC focuses on the material risks that are common for the particular insurance type. For life and health insurance, RBC considers investment risk, insurance risk, interest rate risk, and other market and business risks, by applying factors to various amounts presented in the company's statutory financial statements. The RBC framework was updated in 2021 to introduce more granular risk charges associated with bonds in the RBC formula for life insurers. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the RBC ratios for the U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries are expected to exceed the levels under which any remedial or regulatory action would be required.
Statutory Reserves
State insurance laws require life and health insurance companies to analyze the adequacy of their reserves annually. The appointed actuary for the U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.'s other U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries must submit an opinion that such reserves, when considered in light of the assets held with respect to those reserves, make adequate provision for the associated contractual obligations and related expenses of the U.S. Branch and each of SLF Inc.’s life and health insurance subsidiaries. If such opinion cannot be provided, the affected insurer must set up additional reserves.
Under NAIC rules, life and health insurance companies must maintain an asset valuation reserve (“AVR”), which is a provision for potential asset credit defaults. The size of the AVR depends upon the composition and results of a company’s investment portfolio. These reserves are recorded for purposes of statutory accounting practices; they are not recorded under the provisions of IFRS and therefore have no impact on SLF Inc.'s reported results of operations or financial position. The AVR affects the determination of statutory surplus, and changes in such reserves may affect the ability of SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends or other distributions to their respective parents and also may affect the amounts required to be maintained in trust by the U.S. Branch (see discussion below under Minimum Statutory Surplus and Capital).
Minimum Statutory Surplus and Capital
The U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.'s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries are required to have minimum statutory surplus and capital of various amounts, depending on the states in which they are licensed and the types of business that they transact.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 26
Annual Information Form 2021
The U.S. Branch is required to maintain a certain amount of assets in trust with a financial institution acceptable to the Director of Michigan's Department of Insurance and Financial Services (the “Michigan Director”) in an amount at all times at least equal to the sum of the U.S. Branch's reserves and other liabilities, the minimum required capital and surplus, and any additional amounts considered necessary by the Michigan Director to cover the U.S. Branch's liabilities. Generally, these assets are available only to meet the obligations of Sun Life Assurance to its U.S. policyholders, claimants and other U.S. Branch creditors. Amendments to the trust agreement must be approved by the Michigan Director. As at December 31, 2021, the U.S. Branch had assets in trust in excess of Michigan’s requirements.
Investments of Insurance Companies
The U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.'s other U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries are subject to state laws and regulations that require diversification of their investment portfolios and limit the amount of investments in certain investment categories such as below-investment-grade fixed income securities, equity real estate, foreign investments and equity investments. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations would cause investments exceeding regulatory limits to be treated as non-admitted assets for purposes of measuring surplus and, in some instances, would require divestiture of such non-qualifying investments.
State Guaranty Association Assessments
All states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico require insurers to participate in the local insurance guaranty association. The association may levy assessments for policyholder losses incurred by impaired or insolvent insurers. Generally, assessments up to certain prescribed limits are based upon the proportionate share of premiums written by member insurers in the lines of business in which the impaired or insolvent insurer is engaged. A large part of the assessments paid by SLF Inc.'s U.S. insurance subsidiaries pursuant to these laws may be used as credits for a portion of its U.S. premium taxes.
Regulation of Insurance Operations - Federal Level
Although the U.S. federal government does not directly regulate the insurance business, federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas apply to the conduct of the insurance business, including age and sex discrimination, investment company regulation, financial services regulation, health care regulation, foreign corrupt practices regulation and federal taxation. For example, the U.S. Congress has, from time to time, considered legislation related to limitations on antitrust immunity and the alteration of the federal income tax structure.
Regulation of Securities Operations
The investment management activities of SLF Inc.'s U.S. subsidiaries are subject to federal and state laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where they conduct business. MFS and certain of SLF Inc.'s other U.S. subsidiaries are registered as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), which imposes various obligations on registered investment advisers, including fiduciary duties, and disclosure, operational, recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Several of SLF Inc.'s U.S. subsidiaries issue or have issued products that are registered with the SEC as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) and which issue securities that are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). Certain of SLF Inc.'s U.S. subsidiaries provide investment management services to affiliated funds, which similarly are registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act and which issue securities that are registered under the 1933 Act. The 1940 Act and the 1933 Act impose various obligations on registered investment companies and with respect to the securities that they issue, including disclosure, operational, recordkeeping and reporting requirements and, in the case of the 1940 Act, prohibitions or restrictions on certain transactions with affiliates.
Registered investment companies and investment advisers are regulated by and subject to examination by the SEC. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the U.S. federal securities laws. Failure to comply with applicable securities laws could subject SLF Inc.'s investment companies and investment adviser subsidiaries to a range of regulatory sanctions, including censure, limitations on the registrant's activities, and termination of registration, and could subject its registered investment companies to a cessation of sales or rescission of securities sold.
To the extent that any products are deemed to be securities under U.S. federal or state securities laws, they are qualified for sale as needed in certain states in the United States and the District of Columbia. Marketing and sales of securities products are subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), and regulations promulgated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).
Certain of SLF Inc.'s U.S. subsidiaries are registered as broker-dealers under the 1934 Act and are subject, for example, to the SEC's net capital rules, and are members of, and subject to regulation by FINRA. Certain other U.S. subsidiaries of SLF Inc. are registered as transfer agents under the 1934 Act.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 27
Annual Information Form 2021
MFS also conducts business in the European Union (“EU”) that is also subject to securities laws and regulations. The revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and Regulation (“MiFID II”) became effective on January 3, 2018 and applies across the EU and member states of the European Economic Area ("EEA").Some of the main changes introduced under MiFID II include applying enhanced disclosure requirements, enhancing conduct of business and governance requirements, broadening the scope of pre and post trade transparency, increasing transaction reporting requirements, transforming the relationship between Client commissions and research, and further regulation of trading venues. Implementation of MiFID has had a significant impact on both the structure and operation of EU financial markets. In response to MiFID II, MFS is paying for all external investment research for all clients (including non-European clients).
Other U.S. Regulatory Matters
U.S. Taxation
The U.S. Congress continues to debate business focused tax proposals that could increase tax payable and has proposed a number of possible changes. Given the current composition of Congress, it is uncertain whether any of these changes, which could materially impact our tax expense in the U.S., will be enacted in 2022.
The Dodd-Frank Act
The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”), which was signed into law in July 2010, enacted numerous legal and regulatory changes for the financial services industry, which have been gradually implemented over the ensuing years.
The Dodd-Frank Act mandated the U.S. federal regulation of the over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives market and granted new joint regulatory authority to the SEC and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) over OTC derivatives. The SEC and CFTC have promulgated rules to implement the Dodd-Frank Act's requirements, and certain of Sun Life's derivatives operations have become subject to, among other things, new recordkeeping, reporting and documentation requirements. In addition, certain non-cleared derivatives entered into as part of Sun Life’s derivatives operations are subject to two-way variation margin requirements and will become subject to two-way initial margin requirements beginning in September, 2022. These margining requirements are expected to increase the cost and reduce the availability of non-cleared derivatives. Collectively, the Dodd-Frank Act requirements, and the requirements of similar legislation that has been promulgated by Canadian and European regulators, have increased the direct and indirect costs of the Company's hedging and related activities and will likely increase them further in the future.
LIBOR
LIBOR and other Interbank Offer Rates ("IBORs") measure the average cost that banks pay to borrow from each other on an unsecured basis on a short-term basis. They are commonly used as a benchmark or reference rate for certain financial products and contracts, including Sun Life’s derivatives, loans and floating rate securities investments (collectively, the “Investments”) that are LIBOR or IBOR-based. On July 27, 2017, the UK Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"), which regulates LIBOR, announced its intention to stop persuading or compelling the group of major banks that sustains LIBOR to submit rate quotations after 2021. As a result, it had been uncertain whether LIBOR would continue to be quoted after 2021.
On March 5, 2021, the ICE Benchmark Administration ("IBA") (the entity that is responsible for calculating LIBOR) announced its intention to cease the publication of (a) the one-week and two-month US dollar LIBOR settings, as well as all GBP, EUR, CHF and JPY LIBOR settings, immediately following the LIBOR publication on December 31, 2021, and (b) the remaining US dollar LIBOR settings, immediately following the LIBOR publication on June 30, 2023. On the same day, the FCA confirmed that all 35 LIBOR settings will be discontinued or declared non-representative as of the dates set out above.
On October 20, 2021, the U.S. prudential regulators issued a joint statement emphasizing the expectation that supervised institutions with LIBOR exposure continue to progress toward an orderly transition away from LIBOR, reiterating that supervised institutions should, with limited exceptions, cease entering into new contracts that use US dollar LIBOR as a reference rate no later than December 31, 2021. The joint statement also provided considerations when assessing the appropriateness of alternative reference rates used in lieu of LIBOR, and the expectation that new or updated LIBOR contracts provide for the use of a strong and clearly defined fallback rate when the initial reference rate is discontinued.
In the United States, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") of the Federal Reserve Board has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the replacement rate for US dollar LIBOR. The ARRC has also developed industry specific fallback language that may be used by market participants for contract remediation in order to address the transition from US dollar LIBOR to SOFR. A transition to SOFR or another replacement rate may adversely affect the trading of US dollar LIBOR-based investments, including the Investments, insofar as their value, liquidity, return, and usefulness for intended purpose are concerned. While it may be possible to convert SOFR into a rate that is intended to be equivalent to US dollar LIBOR by developing a term rate or by adding, subtracting or otherwise incorporating one or more interest rate spreads, or by making other appropriate adjustments to minimize, to the extent possible, discrepancies between LIBOR and SOFR, the degree to which such adjustments will be effective in minimizing the differences between US dollar LIBOR and SOFR is affected by a variety of factors, including market conditions, monetary policy, and other factors affecting the liquidity and performance of SOFR and/or US dollar LIBOR during the transition.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 28
Annual Information Form 2021
Similar benchmark reform is also underway in several other countries, where regulators and industry groups (including the Canadian Alternative Reference Rate Working Group ("CARR") in Canada and the Working Group on Risk-Free Reference Rates for the Euro Area in the European Union) have identified, and are facilitating the transition to, alternative secured or unsecured (depending upon the jurisdiction) “risk free” transaction-based rates. For example, in Canada, on June 22, 2021, OSFI, consistent with international efforts, outlined its expectations of federally regulated financial institutions as they transition away from LIBOR, including ceasing the use of US dollar LIBOR settings as soon as possible and not entering into new transactions using LIBOR as a reference rate after December 31, 2021, prioritizing system and model updates to accommodate "risk-free" rates, and the need to have an adequate contingency plan to respond to potential issues that may emerge at LIBOR's cessation. Also, on December 16, 2021, CARR recommended that, with limited exceptions, all new derivative contracts and securities be transitioned from the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate to the Canadian Overnight Repo Rate Average by June 30, 2023, and that all loan agreements be transitioned by June 30, 2024. In the UK, the FCA is working with market participants to facilitate the transition from GBP LIBOR to the Sterling Overnight Index Average and, on November 16, 2021, it confirmed that it will allow the temporary use of "synthetic" GBP LIBOR rates in legacy contracts (other than cleared derivatives) until the end of 2022, in order to allow more time to complete the transition.
At this time, it is difficult to fully predict the effect of the benchmark reform that is or will be taking place in the United States or elsewhere. Uncertainty relating to the transition to alternative rates, the use of ARRC or other fall-back language, accounting and tax relief, and other factors relating to reform may adversely affect our operations and cash flows and the value of and return on our Investments that are LIBOR or IBOR-based. Accordingly, Sun Life continues to implement a comprehensive enterprise-wide program that is focused on ensuring an effective and smooth transition away from LIBOR and other IBORs.
Cybersecurity and Privacy of Client Information
U.S. regulators at the federal and state level are increasing their focus on cybersecurity. In particular, the New York Department of Financial Services has adopted regulations designed to enhance cybersecurity controls of financial institutions, and the Department includes cybersecurity programs within the scope of examination. The NAIC has developed a model cybersecurity regulation based on New York's rule and several states have adopted it. These regulations require licensees, including SLF Inc.’s U.S. insurance subsidiaries, to implement risk-based information security programs; establish detailed procedures for investigating cybersecurity events, assessing risk, and overseeing third-party service providers; and comply with increased regulatory reporting requirements.
In addition, U.S. federal and state laws require financial institutions, including insurers, investment companies and investment dealers, to protect the security and confidentiality of Client information and to notify Clients about the institution’s policies and practices relating to its collection, use and disclosure of client information. The State of California has enacted legislation designed to enhance consumer privacy rights, and other states are considering similar consumer focused privacy laws that would significantly change data privacy requirements in the U.S., impose greater penalties for non-compliance, and provide for consumer rights to access and delete their personal information and private rights of action.
These laws and regulations will increase the costs and compliance obligations associated with the Company’s information security and administration activities.
The Affordable Care Act
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Affordable Care Act”) enacted significant legal and regulatory changes for the health care and insurance industries with a primary goal of increasing the number of Americans with health insurance coverage. While the law’s changes are primarily directed at traditional health insurance products not offered by the U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.’s U.S. life and health insurance subsidiaries, the Affordable Care Act has led to an increase in the number of employers choosing to self insure their health plans. The expansion of the self-insured health plan market has positively impacted our medical stop-loss business.
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “PATRIOT Act”) seeks to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement agencies in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism, money laundering or other illegal activities. Regulations applicable to the insurance industry require insurance companies issuing “covered products” to implement anti-money laundering programs and file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury Department. SLF Inc.'s U.S. subsidiaries that issue covered products and its U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries have implemented anti-money laundering programs to comply with the PATRIOT Act regulations and with the Office of Foreign Assets Control requirements with respect to anti-terrorist financing.
Paid Family and Medical Leave
A growing number of states have passed or are considering mandated paid family and medical leave (“PFML”) programs. These programs generally provide partial income protection for an employee who is unable to work on account of his or her own serious health condition or for various family care reasons. There are a number of PFML proposals at the federal level as well. While PFML programs overlap with short term disability coverage and, as a result, could have a negative impact on the short term disability marketplace in which the U.S. Branch and SLF Inc.’s U.S. life and health subsidiaries operate, these programs also offer an opportunity for insurers to build new products to serve an emerging market.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 29
Annual Information Form 2021
United Kingdom
SLF Inc. does not carry-on business and is not regulated as an insurance or asset management company in the UK. However, it is the indirect owner of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.K.) Limited ("SLOC UK"), which is authorized and regulated as an insurance company in the UK, and subject to the Solvency II insurance regime. Insurance supervision in the UK is performed by two financial services regulators, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”). In addition, there are several other UK regulatory bodies of financial services with whom SLOC UK is required to maintain compliance.
Following the end of the transitional phase of the UK's withdrawal from the EU on December 31, 2020, SLOC UK continues to be subject to the Solvency II regime. However, some of our policyholders continue to be residents of the EU and EEA jurisdictions. As National Competent Authorities, individual EU and EEA regulators may seek additional returns from SLOC UK to meet their local requirements regarding continuity of service to policyholders resident in their jurisdictions, although this has not been the case to date.
Insurance Supervision and Regulation
The FCA's statutory and operational objectives are to protect consumers, ensure market integrity and promote effective competition. The PRA's statutory objectives are to promote the safety and soundness of its regulated firms and to ensure policyholders are appropriately protected. It also has a secondary objective to facilitate effective competition in the markets for services provided by PRA-authorized firms.
Both the FCA and PRA adopt a principles rather than a rules-based philosophy to supervision. Within this approach, they use judgment, are forward looking and focus on the issues that pose the greatest risks to their respective objectives. They aim to supervise proportionately relative to the nature, scale and complexity of the business. Both regulators apply a harmonized approach to their expectations of a firm's governance - the Senior Managers and Certification Regime - which places legally enforceable requirements on designated individuals alongside a Conduct Rules regime that applies to most employees within the business.
Both the FCA and the PRA have extensive powers to intervene in the affairs of an authorized insurance company. These include the power to fine an authorized company and to vary or cancel its permission to carry on regulated activities in the UK, to request information or documents, to investigate the business of the company and to require the company to take appropriate actions to satisfy required threshold conditions for authorization.
SLOC UK is regulated as a Standard Formula firm under Solvency II and carries out certain regulated activities in the UK in relation to long-term contracts of insurance. It is required to meet certain Threshold Conditions and to conduct business in accordance with the provisions set out in the FCA Handbook and the PRA Rulebook. Under these requirements, SLOC UK must maintain systems, procedures and controls appropriate to the nature, scale and complexity of its business, to conduct its business with due regard to the interests of its policyholders, and to treat them fairly. It is also required to hold capital appropriate to its risk profile, and report to the regulator its ongoing compliance in that respect.
Solvency II also includes a group supervision requirement that applies to SLOC UK, its ultimate holding company (SLF of Canada UK Limited), and a number of small, mostly inactive and un-regulated entities. SLF Inc. is excluded from the scope of group supervision under the terms of a rule modification granted by the PRA and scheduled for renewal on December 31, 2022. This group supervision regime also places some firm-specific restrictions on dividend and capital transactions, in addition to the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 regarding the payment of dividends.
Financial Ombudsman Service
The Financial Ombudsman Service ("FOS") provides consumers with a free and independent service to resolve disputes between consumers and financial services firms. The FOS is empowered to order firms to pay compensation for consumer losses and to take steps to remedy a complaint.
Financial Services Compensation Scheme
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme provides for the protection of consumers who may be affected by the inability of financial services companies who carry on regulated business in the UK to meet their liabilities.
The Pensions Regulator
The Pensions Regulator is the regulator of workplace pension schemes and has agreed a joint strategy with the FCA that aims to deliver better outcomes for pension savers and those entering retirement.
Asia
Sun Life carries on business through subsidiaries, joint ventures or associates in the Philippines, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Vietnam, India, China and Malaysia. The operations of our subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates in Asia are subject to the local regulatory and supervisory schemes in the jurisdictions in which they operate, which varies from country to country, but the regulators typically grant (or revoke) licenses to operate and control the ability of a company to operate an insurance business in that country.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 30
Annual Information Form 2021
In general, the applicable legislation in a particular country includes features governing the registration of agents, regulation of product features and product approvals, asset allocation, minimum capital, the basis for calculating solvency and reserves, the valuation of policyholder liabilities, conditions for outsourcing core and non-core functions, policyholder and investor protection, change of directors or key management and money laundering, know-your-Client and terrorist financing requirements. Regulatory authorities may also regulate affiliations with other financial institutions, shareholder structures and may impose restrictions on declaring dividends and the ability to effect certain capital transactions and many jurisdictions require insurance companies to participate in policyholder protection schemes.
Philippines
Our operations in the Philippines, established in 1895, distribute a diverse range of life insurance, asset management and investment products and solutions largely through our career agency sales force and bancassurance channel, an asset management company and an investment & trust company.
We offer individual and group life and health insurance products to individuals and businesses through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Sun Life of Canada (Philippines), Inc. (“Sun Life Philippines”), and our joint venture with the Yuchengco Group, Sun Life Grepa Financial, Inc. (“Sun Life Grepa”), in which we have a 49% ownership stake. In addition, we offer mutual funds and pre-need products respectively through Sun Life Philippines’ wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sun Life Asset Management Company, Inc. (“Sun Life Asset Management (Philippines)”) and Sun Life Financial Plans Inc. (“SLFPI”). Trust and investment management solutions are provided through Sun Life Investment Management and Trust Corporation (“SLIMTC”). There are no foreign ownership restrictions applicable to life insurance, mutual funds, or pre-need and trust companies in Philippines.
Sun Life Philippines and Sun Life Grepa are life insurance companies incorporated in the Philippines and regulated by the Insurance Commission. Sun Life Philippines offers individual and group life and health insurance products through its agency sales force, brokers and fintech partners. Sun Life Grepa offers its individual and group life insurance products through an agency sales force and through bancassurance distribution arrangements. The Insurance Commission supervises and regulates the operations of life, non-life, and pre-need companies.
Life insurance companies in the Philippines are required at all times to maintain the minimum net worth requirements prescribed by regulations. Current minimum net worth requirements are 900 million Philippine Pesos ("Php"), and will increase to Php1.3 billion by 2022. In addition, life insurance companies must maintain a minimum RBC ratio of 100% as prescribed in the Risk-Based Capital Framework. Insurance companies compliant with the net worth requirements as of December 31, 2019 that are adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic are required to comply with the Amended Risk Based Capital Framework and Revised Regulatory Intervention (RBC ratio). The Amended Risk Based Capital Framework adopts a risk-based approach to solvency, including quantitative capital requirements, government and risk management requirements, and disclosure requirements to encourage market discipline. The Revised Regulatory Intervention Ratio provides for the corresponding regulatory action/response to specific levels of RBC ratios. Depending on the RBC ratio, the regulatory response ranges from a required submission of linear extrapolations of the ratio for the next period to a take-over of the insurance company by the Insurance Commission.
Sun Life Asset Management (Philippines) is a mutual fund manager and distributor regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. SLFPI offers pension and education plans in the Philippines, and is regulated by the Insurance Commission.
SLIMTC is regulated by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and is licensed to provide trust and investment management services. It was established to provide multi-strategy local and global portfolio management services and deliver superior risk-adjusted returns for both individual and institutional investors in the Philippines.
Indonesia
In Indonesia, we offer individual life and health insurance, as well as creditor life insurance through our wholly-owned subsidiary, PT Sun Life Financial Indonesia.
PT Sun Life Financial Indonesia is licensed to carry on insurance business in Indonesia and can distribute life insurance products. PT Sun Life Financial Indonesia can additionally manufacture and distribute Shariah products through its Shariah unit.
The Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (“OJK”) is the regulator responsible for supervising the insurance industry. The Indonesia Life Insurance Association (“AAJI”) continues to act as a conduit between life insurers and the Ministry of Finance and the OJK in terms of the development of new regulations and guidelines in relation to the life insurance sector. Life insurance sales forces are licensed by the AAJI. The Indonesia Sharia Insurance Association acts in the similar capacity as AAJI in relation to the Shariah business. The implementation of anti-money laundering controls in the insurance industry is also monitored by the Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center , in addition to it being under the general supervision of the OJK.
Life insurance companies in Indonesia are required to maintain a minimum solvency ratio of 120% of the minimum required capital and must have minimum shareholder equity of 100 billion Indonesian Rupiah.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 31
Annual Information Form 2021
In October 2014, legislation was enacted in Indonesia that introduced significant changes to the insurance sector in Indonesia, including establishing single presence requirements, establishing local ownership requirements to be prescribed by regulations, establishing an insurance guarantee program, requiring that Shariah (Takaful) products are distributed through separate standalone insurance companies within 10 years, requiring the appointment of a controlling entity that will be responsible for losses of the insurance company under its control and imposing stiffer penalties and sanctions for non-compliance. The Government Regulation which regulates local/foreign ownership requirements was issued in April 2018 and since then a grandfathering provision has been included to allow existing ownership by a foreign shareholder to be maintained (the "Grandfathering Provision"). The Government Regulation on the foreign ownership requirement was amended in early 2020. The key amendments introduced include: (1) an expansion of the applicability of the Grandfathering Provision for standalone shariah insurance companies and (2) the removal of requirements for local shareholders in joint venture insurance companies to participate in at least 20% of any capital injection, such that local shareholders are now only required to participate in an amount at least proportionate to their current shareholdings.
Vietnam
In Vietnam, we offer a diverse range of insurance, savings, investment and pension products through our wholly owned subsidiary Sun Life Vietnam Insurance Company Limited (“Sun Life Vietnam”). There are no foreign ownership restrictions applicable to Sun Life Vietnam, however, a transfer of 10% or more of the charter capital of any life insurer must be approved by the Ministry of Finance of Vietnam (“MOF”).
Insurance operations in Vietnam are mainly regulated by the MOF, which sets the standards on all insurance business matters, including product approvals, limits on commission rates payable on insurance products, actuarial liability valuation, and solvency requirements. Life insurers have responsibility for minimum legal capital of Vietnamese Dong ("VND") 600 billion and that a security deposit equal to 2% of the legal capital be maintained at a commercial bank in Vietnam. Life insurers that sell pension products are required to have a minimum legal capital of VND 800 billion. Life insurers that sell pension and unit-linked products are required to have a minimum legal capital of VND 1,000 billion. The equity of the owner of a life insurer must not be lower than the required minimum legal capital applicable to that insurer.
The required solvency margin is VND 300 billion over the minimum solvency margin for insurers selling pension, unit-linked and universal life products. The MOF also requires life insurers to maintain: (a) minimum reserves; (b) for unit-linked policies, a minimum solvency margin of 1.5% insurance reserves plus 0.3% of the sums at risk; (c) for universal life products and pension products, a minimum solvency margin of 4% of insurance reserves plus 0.3% of the sums at risk; and (d) for other life insurance policies and health policies, a minimum solvency margin of 4% of insurance reserves plus either (i) 0.1% of sums at risk for policies with a term of five years or less, or (ii) 0.3% of the sums at risk for policies with a term over five years. Life insurers must also establish a reserve fund to ensure their solvency. Life insurers are to deduct 5% of annual profit after-tax to set up a compulsory reserve fund, the maximum of which is equal to 10% of the charter capital.
Sun Life Vietnam’s products are generally distributed through a career agency sales force, including individual agency, corporate agency and bank partner, for individual Clients and through a corporate agency for corporate Clients. Sun Life Vietnam has an option to contract with eligible insurance auxiliary service providers to support Sun Life Vietnam in selling Sun Life Vietnam's products to Clients. The insurance auxiliary services include insurance consultation, insurance risk assessment, insurance calculation, insurance loss assessment and insurance claim assistance.
A new law to replace the current Law on Insurance Business is in the near final stages of drafting. The draft law was presented for discussion at the meeting of the National Assembly in October 2021, and it is expected to be passed in mid-2022 and take effect beginning January 1, 2023.
India
Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited ("ABSLI"), our insurance joint venture with the Aditya Birla Group in India in which we have a 49% stake, provides a full range of individual and group insurance, savings and retirement products through a multi-channel distribution network, including an agency sales force, bancassurance distribution, brokers and worksite marketing.
Insurance operations in India are regulated by the Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority of India ("IRDAI"), whose duties include issuing certificates of registration to insurance companies, protecting the interests of policyholders, and regulating, promoting and ensuring the orderly growth of the insurance industry. In recent years, a number of regulatory changes have been introduced, affecting matters that include product design and structure including commissions, distribution, investments, expense management, risk management, corporate governance, insurer's registration and grievance handling.
Life insurance companies in India are expected to maintain a Minimum Solvency Ratio (Total Assets Available for Solvency / Required Solvency Margin) of 150% at all times, where the Required Solvency Margin is an amount calculated by applying specified factors to reserves and amounts-at-risk. Life insurance companies are required to maintain their Available Solvency Margin at a level which is not less than the greater of fifty per cent of the amount of minimum required capital and one hundred percent of Required Solvency Margin. The Minimum Paid-up Capital for life insurers is INR 1 billion.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 32
Annual Information Form 2021
The Indian regulator has been actively engaging with insurers and other stakeholders to monitor and manage the ongoing effects of COVID-19 pandemic on the insurance sector. The IRDAI is also keeping a close watch on COVID-19 death claims and has prescribed measures to ensure prompt settlement of such claims to ensure that policyholder interests are not negatively impacted on account of higher claims volume.
The foreign investment limit in the insurance sector in India is 74% of the equity share capital in an Indian insurance company and a majority of its directors, a majority of its Key Management Persons, and at least one among the Chairperson of its Board, its Managing Director and its CEO, being Resident Indian Citizens. In addition, prior approval is required from the IRDAI for any sale of shares over 1% of the total equity share capital and any purchase of more than 5% of the equity share capital and increases in foreign investment in an Indian insurance company must comply with the pricing guidelines specified by the Reserve Bank of India.
Aditya Birla Sun Life Pension Management Limited (“ABSLPML”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of ABSLI. ABSLPML’s business offers pension solutions and acts as Pension Fund Manager under the National Pension Scheme Trust of the National Pension System (“NPS”) to manage pension funds in the private sector according to the provisions of the NPS, the schemes, and the guidelines issued by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority.
Mutual funds and portfolio management services in India are regulated by the guidelines and regulations issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India and various other applicable statutes.
Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited (“ABSLAMC”) is our asset management joint venture in India in which we have a 36.5% stake. The equity shares of ABSLAMC have been listed on National Stock Exchange of India Limited and BSE Limited on October 11, 2021. ABSLAMC, offers mutual fund products and portfolio management services, and is also registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India to act as an investment manager to the funds launched under Alternative Investment Funds: Category III and Category II. ABSLAMC has also set up wholly owned subsidiaries in Singapore, Dubai and Mauritius.
China
Sun Life Everbright Life Insurance Company Limited is a domestically-invested life insurance company in China, in which we have a 24.99% ownership stake. It operates a multi-distribution model that combines a direct career agency, financial consultants, telemarketing and bancassurance alliances to sell individual life and health insurance and savings products.
Sun Life Everbright Life Insurance Company Limited has a 99% ownership stake in Sun Life Everbright Asset Management Co., Ltd, which carries on business in China as an insurance asset management company.
The insurance industry in China is regulated by the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (“CBIRC”), which is a central government agency under the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. The CBIRC has authority to: (i) issue regulatory rules and other normative documents applicable to the insurance industry and insurance market participants to implement the relevant laws and administrative regulations; (ii) review and approve the establishment, alteration and other significant matters of insurance institutions (which generally include insurance group (holding) companies, insurance companies and insurance asset management companies) and insurance intermediaries in China and, where applicable, their overseas activities (e.g., investment) and activities of their overseas subsidiaries; (iii) review and approve the policy terms and premium rates for insurance products; (iv) formulate and implement standards to measure and supervise the corporate governance, risk management, internal control, financial soundness, capital sufficiency, solvency, operational compliance and information disclosure of insurance institutions; (v) require insurance institutions to submit periodical and ad hoc reports concerning their business operations and condition of assets; and (vi) take necessary regulation measures and impose corresponding regulatory sanctions (e.g. to order the suspension of all or part of an insurance company's business, to restrict the exercise of a shareholder's rights if that shareholder fails to fulfill its obligations).
Currently, insurance companies established in China (including life insurance companies) are allowed to use their insurance funds (including their capital funds, reserve funds, undistributed profits, various reserves and other funds, whether dominated in RMB or a foreign currency) to invest in the following assets (subject to the satisfaction of conditions prescribed for each form of investment): bank deposits, various negotiable securities (such as government bonds, corporate bonds, financial bonds, stocks, units of securities investment funds), publicly offered infrastructure securities investment funds, security lending business, real estate, equity interest, financial derivatives such as forwards, options and interest rate swaps (provided that investment in any financial derivatives must not be speculative but be only intended for risk hedging and investment in offshore financial derivatives is subject to additional requirements of the CBIRC), products of insurance asset management companies, certain qualified financial products of commercial banks, trust companies, securities companies, securities investment fund management companies and other financial institutions and other investment channels as approved by the State Council.
The minimum paid-up capital of an insurance company is RMB200 million (in cash only) and there are additional capital requirements when additional branches are established.
Insurance asset management companies are also regulated by the CBIRC and may conduct the following businesses: (i) managing and utilizing funds in RMB or foreign currencies entrusted to them by their clients (including but not limited to their shareholders
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 33
Annual Information Form 2021
and the insurance companies controlled by their shareholders); (ii) managing and utilizing their own funds in RMB or foreign currencies; (iii) privately offering insurance asset management products to qualified investors; and (iv) other businesses approved by the CBIRC or other ministries or departments of the State Council.
The management and utilization of insurance funds by insurance asset management companies is subject to requirements and limitations that are similar to those applicable to insurance companies. Currently, insurance and asset management companies established in China are allowed to use the entrusted insurance funds to invest in the following assets: bank deposits in domestic market, government bonds, financial bonds, stocks, security investment funds and other investment channels as approved by the State Council. Independent custodians are designated for funds managed by insurance asset management companies and those custodians must be commercial banks or other financial institutions that satisfy regulatory requirements. The registered capital of an insurance asset management company must not be less than RMB100 million or the equivalent amount in a freely convertible foreign currency.
Insurance companies may, either by themselves or by entrusting qualified investment managers, use their insurance funds to make investments, and such "qualified investment managers" include not only insurance asset management companies and their subsidiaries, but also securities companies, securities asset management companies, securities investment management companies and their subsidiaries and other professional investment management institutions. Insurance asset management companies are allowed to manage and utilize not only entrusted insurance funds, but also other entrusted funds of non-insurance clients.
Insurance asset management companies are also allowed to carry out insurance asset management product business in accordance with the CBIRC's rules and should complete the product issuance, registration, custody, transaction, settlement, information disclosure and other processes via an asset registration and transaction platform as approved by the CBIRC. The CBIRC is responsible for dynamically supervising the full process of the operation and management of such products and identifying the ultimate investors (beneficiaries) and the underlying assets.
Effective January 1, 2020, the CBIRC lifted the previous 51% cap on foreign ownership in life insurance companies established in China, which means that a foreign investor is now permitted to wholly own a life insurance company in China. In October 2019, the CBIRC also implemented an amendment to the Administrative Regulations on Foreign-Invested Insurance Companies, which relaxes market access by removing the requirement that a foreign insurance company must have engaged in insurance business for more than 30 years and have maintained a representative office in China for at least two years before it can establish a foreign invested insurance company in China, and allowing foreign insurance groups to invest in and establish an insurance company and other overseas financial institutions to make investments in insurance companies.
Hong Kong
Our operations in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region offer a full range of products to address insurance and savings needs. We offer individual life and health insurance, mandatory provident funds (the government-legislated pension system) and pension administration to individuals and businesses through a career sales agency force and independent financial advisors.
Sun Life Hong Kong Limited is authorized by the Hong Kong Insurance Authority ("IA") under the Insurance Ordinance to carry on certain classes of long-term business in or from Hong Kong. On June 26, 2017, the IA took over from the previous governmental regulator, the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance, the functions of overseeing the authorization and regulation of insurance companies in Hong Kong. On September 23, 2019, the IA took over the regulation of insurance intermediaries from the then existing self-regulatory organizations through a new statutory licensing and intermediary supervision regime. The offer of our investment linked insurance products, pooled retirement funds, approved pool investment funds, mandatory provident fund schemes and occupational retirement schemes are also regulated by one or more of the financial services regulators, including the IA, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission and/or the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority. Our trustees and intermediaries who administer and distribute these products, funds and schemes are also supervised and regulated by one or more of the above regulators.
In Hong Kong, long-term insurance companies are required to maintain at all times a required solvency margin. Under the law, the required solvency margin is the higher of $2 million Hong Kong dollars ("HKD") or the aggregate of two components: a percentage of the mathematical reserves and a percentage of the capital at risk as prescribed under the Insurance (Margin of Solvency) Rules (which is generally 4% of the mathematical reserves and 0.3% of the capital at risk). For a long-term insurer, under the law, the value of its assets must be greater than the amount of its liabilities by at least the required solvency margin. The minimum paid-up capital for insurers in Hong Kong is HKD$10 million. In practice, the actual capital requirement is much higher than what the law requires, and will also depend on the business undertaken by the insurer. Despite the above, in practice, the IA will also impose additional solvency requirements to ensure a sound and healthy insurance market.
Malaysia
Our operations in Malaysia offer individual and group insurance and takaful products through Sun Life Malaysia Assurance Berhad ("SLMA") and Sun Life Malaysia Takaful Berhad ("SLMT"), respectively, our joint ventures with Renggis Ventures Sdn. Bhd. (a subsidiary of Khazanah Nasional Berhad), in which we have a 49% ownership stake in each company. SLMA has an exclusive bancassurance agreement with CIMB Bank Berhad to distribute insurance products through its network across Malaysia, while SLMT
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 34
Annual Information Form 2021
has an exclusive bancatakaful agreement with CIMB Islamic Bank Berhad to distribute takaful products through its network across Malaysia. The companies have expanded their distribution channel to include other bancassurance and bancatakaful partners, agency distribution, direct marketing, government and corporate business, telemarketing, online and telco-assurance.
The central bank of Malaysia, Bank Negara Malaysia ("BNM"), regulates entities carrying on the insurance and takaful business in Malaysia and requires insurers and takaful operators to have a minimum paid-up capital of Ringgit Malaysia 100 million. BNM also requires insurers and takaful operators to maintain a capital adequacy level that is commensurate with their risk profiles under the risk-based capital frameworks and has set a minimum Supervisory Target Capital Adequacy Level of 130%. Based on current Government policy, there is a 70% limit on foreign equity ownership in insurance companies and takaful operators in Malaysia. Under the BNM's recent Discussion Paper on Risk-Based Capital Framework for Insurers and Takaful Operators (Framework Design) issued on June 30, 2021, several enhancements have been proposed to the design of the capital adequacy framework for licensed insurers and takaful operators ("ITO"). Feedback has been sought from ITOs and a quantitative impact study will be performed in the first half of 2022 to collect data for further analysis and refinement of the proposed new framework design. The Discussion Paper is part of a phased approach towards refining the capital adequacy requirements of ITOs. A new framework embodying the revised approach is expected to be implemented in 2024.
In efforts to minimize the impact of disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, BNM has introduced various relief measures for affected policyholders, including an option to defer payment of life insurance premiums and family takaful contributions for 3 months and this premium deferment assistance is available until December 31, 2021. BNM has also reduced the interest rate and profit rate stress factor caps applied under the risk-based capital frameworks from 40% to 30% with effect from March 31, 2020 to reflect the changes in the prevailing market conditions since the stress factors were set in 2009. A COVID-19 test fund of RM 10 million has been created to cover the costs incurred for the screening of COVID-19 by policyholders, although this fund was fully utilized in May 2021. Other types of assistance provided to affected policyholders include extending the period during which the policyholder can reinstate a policy that has been terminated due to non-payment of premium, providing options for policy alterations, waiver of fees or charges for policy alterations, electronic payment alternatives and waiver of penalties for late payment of premiums.
Bermuda
Sun Life Assurance and certain SLF Inc. subsidiaries carry on insurance and investment business in or from Bermuda and are regulated as insurance or investment companies, as the case may be, in that jurisdiction. The Bermuda Monetary Authority (“BMA”) is the primary regulator of domestic and international insurance and investment companies carrying on business in or from Bermuda, and has regulatory authority for licensing and registration matters. The BMA has broad supervisory powers to regulate licensees under the Insurance Act 1978 and the Investment Business Act 2003, and is also the designated supervisory authority over the financial services industry in respect of Bermuda’s Proceeds of Crime Act anti-money laundering legislation. In accordance with these and related laws, Sun Life Assurance and certain subsidiaries of SLF Inc. are subject to requirements governing their solvency, financial reporting, privacy and data security and business conduct.
Other Jurisdictions
In each of the countries in which our other subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates operate, local regulatory authorities supervise and monitor their business and financial condition. In a number of countries, certain insurance subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are required to meet specific minimum working and regulatory capital requirements. Certain of our subsidiaries (including MFS, BentallGreenOak, InfraRed and/or their respective subsidiaries), joint ventures and associates, also conduct business in various countries, including Singapore, Japan and Australia, that are subject to applicable laws and regulations, which vary from country to country.
Risk Factors
This section provides a summary of some of the significant risks that could affect (and, in some cases, are affecting) our business, reputation, financial condition or results of operations. As a large financial services organization operating in a complex industry, the Company encounters a variety of risks and uncertainties. We face risks in formulating our business strategy and business objectives, in carrying on our business activities in the pursuit of our strategy and objectives, and from external factors such as changes in the economic, political, competitive and regulatory environments. We are subject to financial and insurance risks that are connected to our liabilities and also in connection with the management and performance of our assets, including how we match returns from assets with the payment of liabilities to our Clients. Each of these risks are also considered from the perspective of different types of uncertainties under which either the outcomes and/or their probabilities of occurrence are unknown.
Uncertainty can exist around expected financial results and from volatility, trend and extreme events. In addition, risk correlation, interconnected risks, terms of exposure and the risk horizon are important elements to consider while identifying risks.
These risk factors have been grouped as outlined in our Risk Management Framework into six major categories: market, insurance, credit, business and strategic, operational and liquidity risks. Other risks, not specified below, may exist but are not considered to be material at the present time may also impact our business in the future. This information should be considered carefully together
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 35
Annual Information Form 2021
with other information in this AIF and in the 2021 MD&A, the 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements and other reports and materials that we file with securities regulators.
These risks may occur independently or in combinations, and may occur simultaneously or in an environment where one or more risks evolve rapidly. For example, a major pandemic could have a material adverse impact on mortality and morbidity claims experience. Such an event may also trigger adverse global capital markets developments, including a downturn in equity market levels and interest rates, increased market volatility and credit deterioration, and could also lead to operational risks such as disruptions within the organization and in third party service arrangements or a government or regulatory response.
While a number of risks that are described below provide examples of inter-connectedness and relationships between risks, these do not represent a complete inventory. It should be noted that these relationships can continue to develop and change over time, and the combined adverse impact on our profitability, financial position, and reputation could be significantly greater than the sum of the individual parts. Our assessment of the impact and probability of these risks changes over time.
A description of our risk management approach can be found under the heading Risk Management in our 2021 MD&A. Many of the risk factors set out below contain forward-looking statements.
Market Risk
We are exposed to financial and capital market risk, which is defined as the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of an insurance contract or financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes or volatility in market prices. Market risk includes equity, interest rate and spread, real estate and foreign currency risks.
Equity Risk
Equity risk is the potential for financial loss arising from declines or volatility in equity market prices. We are exposed to equity risk from a number of sources. A portion of our exposure to equity risk arises in connection with benefit guarantees on segregated fund products. These benefit guarantees may be triggered upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization. The cost of providing these guarantees is uncertain and depends upon a number of factors, including general capital market conditions, our hedging strategies, policyholder behaviour and mortality experience, each of which may result in negative impacts on net income and capital.
While a large percentage of these segregated fund products are included in our hedging program, not all of this exposure is hedged. For those contracts included in our hedging program, we generally hedge the value of expected future net claims costs and associated margins, as we are primarily focused on hedging expected economic costs associated with providing the guarantees. Since the value of benefits being hedged will generally differ from the financial statement value (due to different valuation methods and the inclusion of valuation margins in respect of financial statement values), this approach will result in residual volatility to equity market shocks in reported income and capital. The general availability and cost of these hedging instruments may be adversely impacted by a number of factors, including changes in interest rates, increased volatility in capital markets and changes in the general market and regulatory environment within which these hedging programs operate.
Our hedging programs may themselves expose us to other risks, including basis risk (i.e., the risk that hedges do not exactly replicate the underlying portfolio experience), volatility risk, and increased levels of derivative counterparty credit risk, liquidity risk, model risk and other operational risks. These factors may adversely impact the net effectiveness, costs, and financial viability of maintaining our hedging programs and therefore adversely impact our profitability and financial position. While our hedging programs are intended to mitigate these effects, residual risk and potential reported earnings and capital volatility remain. In addition, regulations for over-the-counter derivatives could impose additional costs and could affect our hedging strategy. Hedge counterparty credit risk is managed by maintaining broad diversification, dealing primarily with highly rated counterparties and transacting through over-the-counter contracts cleared through central clearing houses, exchange-traded contracts or bilateral over-the-counter contracts negotiated directly between counterparties that include applicable credit support annexes.
We generate revenue in our asset management businesses and from certain insurance and annuity contracts where fees are levied on account balances that are affected directly by equity market levels. Accordingly, we have further exposure to equity risk as adverse fluctuations in the market value of such assets will result in corresponding adverse impacts on our revenue and net income. In addition, declining and volatile equity markets may have a negative impact on sales and redemptions (surrenders) in these businesses, and this may result in further adverse impacts on our net income and financial position.
We also have direct exposure to equity markets from the investments supporting other general account liabilities, surplus, and employee benefit plans. These exposures fall within our risk-taking philosophy and appetite, and are therefore generally not hedged.
Interest Rate and Spread Risk
Interest rate and spread risk is the potential for financial loss arising from changes or volatility in interest rates or spreads when asset cash flows and the policy obligations they support are not matched. This may result in the need to either sell assets to meet policy payments and expenses or reinvest excess asset cash flows in unfavourable interest rate or spread environments. The impact of changes or volatility in interest rates or spreads is reflected in the valuation of our financial assets and liabilities for insurance contracts.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 36
Annual Information Form 2021
Our primary exposure to interest rate and spread risk arises from certain general account products and segregated fund contracts which contain investment guarantees in the form of minimum crediting rates, guaranteed premium rates, settlement options and benefit guarantees. If investment returns fall below guaranteed levels, we may be required to increase liabilities or capital in respect of these contracts. The guarantees attached to these products may be applicable to both past premiums collected and future premiums not yet received. Segregated fund contracts provide benefit guarantees that are linked to underlying fund performance and may be triggered upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization. These products are included in our asset-liability management program and the residual interest rate exposure is managed within our risk appetite limits.
Declines in interest rates or narrowing spreads can result in compression of the net spread between interest earned on investments and interest credited to policyholders. Declines in interest rates or narrowing spreads may also result in increased asset calls, mortgage prepayments, and net reinvestment of positive cash flows at lower yields, and therefore adversely impact our profitability and financial position. Negative interest rates may additionally result in losses on our cash deposits and low or negative returns on our fixed income assets impacting our profitability. In contrast, increases in interest rates or a widening of spreads may have a material impact on the value of fixed income assets, resulting in depressed market values, and may lead to lower LICAT ratios or losses in the event of the liquidation of assets prior to maturity.
Significant changes or volatility in interest rates or spreads could have a negative impact on sales of certain insurance and annuity products, and adversely impact the expected pattern of redemptions (surrenders) on existing policies. Increases in interest rates or widening spreads may increase the risk that policyholders will surrender their contracts, potentially forcing us to liquidate assets at a loss and accelerate recognition of certain acquisition expenses. While we have established hedging programs in place and our insurance and annuity products often contain surrender mitigation features, these may not be sufficient to fully offset the adverse impact of the underlying losses.
We also have direct exposure to interest rates and spreads from investments supporting other general account liabilities, surplus and employee benefit plans. Lower interest rates or a narrowing of spreads will result in reduced investment income on new fixed income asset purchases. Conversely, higher interest rates or wider spreads will reduce the value of our existing assets. These exposures fall within our risk-taking philosophy and appetite and are therefore generally not hedged.
We have implemented asset-liability management and hedging programs involving regular monitoring and adjustment of risk exposures using assets, derivative instruments and repurchase agreements to maintain interest rate exposures within our risk appetite. The general availability and cost of these hedging instruments may be adversely impacted by a number of factors including changes in interest rates, increased volatility in capital markets, and changes in the general market and regulatory environment within which these hedging programs operate. In particular, regulations for over-the-counter derivatives could impose additional costs and could affect our hedging strategy. In addition, these programs may themselves expose us to other risks such as those described under the heading Risk Factors - Market Risk - Equity Risk in this AIF.
A sustained low interest rate environment may adversely impact our earnings, regulatory capital requirements and our ability to implement our business strategy and plans in several ways, including:
(i)Lower sales of certain insurance and wealth products, which can in turn pressure our operating expense levels;
(ii)Shifts in the expected pattern of redemptions (surrenders) on existing policies;
(iii)Higher new business strain reflecting lower new business profitability;
(iv)Reduced return on new fixed income asset purchases, and higher hedging costs;
(v)The impact of changes in actuarial assumptions;
(vi)Impairment of goodwill; and
(vii)Additional valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets.
We have taken various management actions to mitigate the risk of low levels of interest rates including changes in product mix, product design and hedging activities. If low levels of interest rates continue to be persistent over an extended period of time, other effects may also surface including changes in policyholder behaviour and actuarial assumptions prescribed by the regulating bodies.
Real Estate Risk
Real estate risk is the potential for financial loss arising from fluctuations in the value of, or future cash flows from, our investments in real estate. We are exposed to real estate risk and may experience financial losses resulting from the direct ownership of real estate investments or indirectly through fixed income investments secured by real estate property, leasehold interests, ground rents, and purchase and leaseback transactions. Real estate price risk may arise from external market conditions, inadequate property analysis, inadequate insurance coverage, inappropriate real estate appraisals, or from environmental risk exposures. We hold direct real estate investments that support general account liabilities and surplus, and fluctuations in value will impact our profitability and financial position. A material and sustained increase in interest rates may lead to deterioration in real estate values.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 37
Annual Information Form 2021
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency risk is the result of mismatches in the currency of our assets and liabilities (inclusive of capital), and cash flows. This risk may arise from a variety of sources such as foreign currency transactions and services, foreign currency hedging, investments denominated in foreign currencies, investments in foreign subsidiaries and net income from foreign operations. Changes or volatility in foreign exchange rates, including a change to currencies that are fixed in value to another currency, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
As an international provider of financial services, we operate in a number of countries, with revenues and expenses denominated in several local currencies. In each country in which we operate, we generally maintain the currency profile of assets to match the currency of aggregate liabilities and required surplus. This approach provides an operational hedge against disruptions in local operations caused by currency fluctuations. Foreign currency derivative contracts such as currency swaps and forwards are used as a risk management tool to manage the currency exposure in accordance with our Asset Liability Management Policy. As at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company did not have a material foreign currency risk exposure on a functional currency basis.
Changes in exchange rates can affect our net income and surplus when financial results in functional currencies are translated into Canadian dollars. Net income earned outside of Canada is generally not currency hedged and a weakening in the local currency of our foreign operations relative to the Canadian dollar can have a negative impact on our net income reported in Canadian currency. A strengthening in the local currency of our foreign operations relative to the Canadian dollar would have the opposite effect. Regulatory capital ratios could also be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
Insurance Risk
Insurance risk is the uncertainty of product performance due to actual experience emerging differently than expected in the areas of policyholder behaviour, mortality, morbidity and longevity. In addition, product design and pricing, expense and reinsurance risks impact multiple risk categories, including insurance risk.
Policyholder Behaviour Risk
We can incur losses due to adverse policyholder behaviour relative to the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products with regard to lapse of policies or exercise of other embedded policy options.
Uncertainty in policyholder behaviour can arise from several sources including unexpected events in the policyholder's life circumstances, the general level of economic activity (whether higher or lower than expected), changes in the financial and capital markets, changes in pricing and availability of current products, the introduction of new products, changes in underwriting technology and standards, as well as changes in our financial strength or reputation. Uncertainty in future cash flows affected by policyholder behaviour can be further exacerbated by irrational behaviour during times of economic turbulence or at key option exercise points in the life of an insurance contract.
Many of our products include some form of embedded policyholder option. These could range from simple options relating to surrender or termination, to more complex options relating to payment of premiums or various other benefit and coverage provisions. Changes in the relative frequency or pattern with which these options are elected (relative to those assumed in the pricing and valuation of these options) could have an adverse impact on our profitability and financial position.
Systemic forms of policyholder behaviour risk could also arise with the development of investor-owned and secondary markets for life insurance policies.
Mortality and Morbidity Risk
Mortality and morbidity risk is the risk that future experience could be worse than the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products. Mortality and morbidity risk can arise in the normal course of business through random fluctuation in realized experience, through catastrophes, as a result of a pandemic, or in association with other risk factors such as product development and pricing or model risk. Adverse mortality and morbidity experience could also occur through systemic anti-selection, which could arise due to poor plan design, or underwriting process failure or the development of investor-owned and secondary markets for life insurance policies.
External factors could adversely affect our life insurance, health insurance, critical illness, disability, long-term care insurance and annuity businesses. Morbidity experience could be unfavourably impacted by external events, such as pandemics, increases in disability claims during economic slowdowns and increases in high medical treatment costs and growth in utilization of specialty drugs. This introduces the potential for adverse financial volatility in our financial results.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 38
Annual Information Form 2021
Mortality and morbidity concentration risk is the risk of a catastrophic event, such as natural environmental disasters (for example, earthquakes), human-made disasters (for example, acts of terrorism, military actions, and inadvertent introduction of toxic elements into the environment) as well as epidemics that could occur in geographic locations where there is significant insurance coverage. Certain factors could adversely affect our mortality or morbidity experience relative to the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products, leading to a material adverse effect on our profitability and financial position.
Current legislation restricts insurers from requiring Clients to take or release the results of genetic tests. If Clients have access to the results of genetic tests and we do not, this creates asymmetry of information between Clients and insurers, which could adversely impact mortality and morbidity experience and policyholder behaviour. This asymmetry of information may increase as genetic testing advances and becomes more accessible, giving rise to better diagnoses of conditions where treatments are expensive or non-existent. The asymmetry of information may lead to increased anti-selection in new business underwriting. There may also be an impact on policy lapse rates where adverse genetic testing results may motivate Clients to retain their policies resulting in higher claims payouts than assumed in the pricing and valuation of products, as well as increased insurance rates which may result in loss of new and existing Clients.
Longevity Risk
Longevity risk is the potential for economic loss, accounting loss or volatility in earnings arising from adverse changes in rates of mortality improvement relative to the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products. This risk can manifest itself slowly over time as socioeconomic conditions improve and medical advances continue. It could also manifest itself more quickly, for example, due to medical breakthroughs that significantly extend life expectancy. Longevity risk affects contracts where benefits or costs are based upon the likelihood of survival and higher than expected improvements in policyholder life expectancy could therefore increase the ultimate cost of these benefits (for example, annuities, pensions, pure endowments, reinsurance, segregated funds, and specific types of health contracts). Additionally, our longevity risk exposure is increased for certain annuity products such as guaranteed annuity options by an increase in equity market levels.
Many of our products provide benefits over the policyholder's continued lifetime. Higher than expected improvements in policyholder life expectancy could therefore increase the ultimate cost of these benefits, thereby requiring strengthening of policyholder liabilities and resulting in reductions in net income and capital. For longevity risks, external factors including medical advances could adversely affect our life insurance, health insurance, critical illness, disability, long-term care insurance and annuity businesses.
Product Design and Pricing Risk
Product design and pricing risk is the risk a product does not perform as expected, causing adverse financial consequences. This risk may arise from deviations in realized experience versus assumptions used in the pricing of products. Risk factors include uncertainty concerning future investment yields, policyholder behaviour, mortality and morbidity experience, sales levels, mix of business, expenses and taxes. Although some of our products permit us to increase premiums or adjust other charges and credits during the life of the policy or contract, the terms of these policies or contracts may not allow for sufficient adjustments to maintain expected profitability. This could have an adverse effect on our profitability and capital position.
Products that offer complex features, options or guarantees require increasingly complex pricing models, methods or assumptions, leading to additional levels of uncertainty. The risk of mis-pricing increases with the number and inherent uncertainty of assumptions needed to model a product. Past experience data supplemented with future trend assumptions may be poor predictors of future experience. Lack of experience data on new products or new Client segments increases the risk that future actual experience unfolds differently from expected assumptions. External environmental factors may introduce new risk factors, which were unanticipated during product design, and have an adverse result on the financial performance of the product. Policyholder sophistication and behaviour in the future may vary from that assumed at the time the product is designed, thereby adversely affecting the product's financial performance.
Expense Risk
Expense risk is the risk that future expenses are higher than the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products. This risk can arise from general economic conditions, unexpected increases in inflation, slower than anticipated growth, or reduction in productivity leading to increases in unit expenses. Expense risk occurs in products where we cannot or will not pass increased costs onto the Client and will manifest itself in the form of a liability increase or a reduction in expected future profits.
From time to time, certain products or business segments may be closed for new sales (for example variable annuities in our international business in the Asia pillar, our business in the UK and our individual insurance business in the U.S.). Our ability to effectively manage the run-off of business in these products or business segments introduces additional risks, such as policyholder behaviour and expense risk that may have an adverse effect on our operations, profitability and financial position.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 39
Annual Information Form 2021
Reinsurance Risk
We purchase reinsurance for certain risks underwritten by our various insurance businesses. Reinsurance risk is the risk of financial loss due to adverse developments in reinsurance markets (for example, discontinuance or diminution of reinsurance capacity, or an increase in the cost of reinsurance), insolvency of a reinsurer or inadequate reinsurance coverage.
Changes in reinsurance market conditions, including actions taken by reinsurers to increase rates on existing and new coverage and our ability to obtain appropriate reinsurance, may adversely impact the availability or cost of maintaining existing or securing new reinsurance capacity, with adverse impacts on our business strategies, profitability and financial position. There is a possibility of rate increases or renegotiation of some of the legacy reinsurance contracts by a few of our reinsurers, as they continue to review and optimize their business models. In addition, changes to the regulatory treatment of reinsurance arrangements could have an adverse impact on our capital position.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the possibility of loss from amounts owed by our borrowers or financial counterparties. We are subject to credit risk in connection with issuers of securities held in our investment portfolio, debtors, structured securities, reinsurers, counterparties (including derivative, repurchase agreement and securities lending counterparties), other financial institutions and other entities. Losses may occur when a counterparty fails to make timely payments pursuant to the terms of the underlying contractual arrangement or when the counterparty's credit rating or risk profile otherwise deteriorates. Credit risk can also arise in connection with deterioration in the value of, or ability to realize, any underlying security that may be used as collateral for the debt obligation. Credit risk can occur as a result of broad economic conditions, challenges within specific sectors of the economy, or from issues affecting individual companies. Events that result in defaults, impairments or downgrades of the securities in our investment portfolio would cause the Company to record realized or unrealized losses and may cause an increase in our provisions for asset default, adversely impacting earnings.
Volatility in the capital markets, including deteriorating credit and negative real estate risk indicators, fluctuations in global or domestic macro-economic factors, or loss given default expectations, may have a significant impact on the value of the fixed income assets in our investment portfolio. For example, our asset-backed portfolio is sensitive to fluctuations in macro-economic factors, assumed default rates for the underlying collateral pool and loss given default expectations.
As part of our risk management strategy, we maintain hedging programs that may employ the use of derivatives. Market conditions determine the availability and cost of the derivative protection. Although we deal primarily with highly rated counterparties, a derivative counterparty's insolvency or its inability or unwillingness to make payments under the terms of a derivative agreement could have an adverse effect on our profitability and financial position.
We purchase reinsurance for certain risks underwritten by our various insurance businesses. Reinsurance does not relieve us from our direct liability to policyholders and accordingly, we bear credit risk with respect to our reinsurers. Although we deal primarily with highly rated reinsurers, deterioration in their credit ratings, or reinsurer insolvency, inability or unwillingness to make payments under the terms of a reinsurance agreement could have an adverse effect on our profitability and financial position. The risk that a reinsurer is unable or unwilling to make payments may occur due to, but is not limited to, legal disagreements, interpretations by a court regarding the terms of the reinsurance contract, changes in laws and regulations or interpretation of those changes.
Business and Strategic Risk
Business and strategic risk is the risk of loss from the inability to adequately identify, plan or implement an appropriate business strategy to achieve strategic and business objectives or adapt to changes in Client behaviours or the external business, economic, political, regulatory or environmental and social landscape.
Economic and Political Risk
We operate in various geographies and our business and financial operations are susceptible to regional and global economic, political and regulatory changes. We may be affected by economic and capital markets conditions and economic shocks around the globe as a result of increasingly connected global markets. Factors such as changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, market volatility, housing prices, consumer spending, saving and debt, business investment and inflation around the globe can affect the business and economic environments in which we operate. Continued economic and political uncertainty may give rise to increased business and strategic risks including those associated with industry restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, changing competitive dynamics and changes in the legal, regulatory and tax regimes in which our businesses operate. In addition, adverse economic conditions often arise in conjunction with volatile and deteriorating capital markets conditions, which can have an adverse impact on Client behaviour and in turn on our sales and profitability, credit and financial strength ratings, and capital and liquidity positions.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 40
Annual Information Form 2021
Currently, there are various factors that impact continuing economic and political risk and uncertainty, including the following examples:
•the duration and longer-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has already had an adverse impact on the global economy, and may deepen if prolonged, adding to financial market volatility, labour market distortions, supply chain disruptions, corporate insolvency risks and household wealth impacts;
•the shift to protectionism leading to ongoing trade uncertainties and/or new or increased tariffs;
•macro-economic uncertainty and potential disruptive policy changes due to global political unrest as seen within Hong Kong and strained relations between countries, such as between the United States and Russia or China;
•uncertainty due to Euroscepticism in various European Union countries and the impact of Brexit;
•increased support for populist parties; and
•rising income inequality.
These risks can also intersect with other risk considerations such as environmental and social risks including climate change and inequality. The impact of these factors include the possibility of continued low growth, sustained low interest rates, increases in inflation, increased volatility in interest rates and equity markets, and a continuation of relatively low yet volatile credit spreads. The impact on the economic environment from any of these events may not be consistent with our assumptions and expectations, which may adversely impact our financial results and the ability to implement our business strategy. Market-related impacts from the economic environment, legal, regulatory or policy changes or other governmental actions could continue to place pressure on our earnings, regulatory capital requirements, profitability, liquidity and our ability to implement our business strategies and plans. Low interest rates and increased volatility create a number of challenges for us including increased hedge costs, lower investment yields, adverse policyholder behaviour and lower levels of new business profitability. Other impacts of macro-economic uncertainty and volatility may lead to other financial and non-financial impacts including goodwill impairment, decline in our share price and impact on our credit and financial strength ratings. These risks continue to have the potential to inflict significant damage on global and regional markets.
Strategic Execution Risk
Our business strategies and plans are dependent on the successful execution of organizational and strategic initiatives designed to support the growth of our business. Our ability to manage the execution of these initiatives effectively and prioritize initiatives directly affects our ability to execute our strategies. Identifying and implementing the right set of initiatives is critical to achieving our business plan targets. Failure to identify and implement the right set of initiatives could also lead to cost structure challenges and inability to achieve our growth objectives.
Our financial performance is dependent upon our ability to implement and execute our business strategies and plans for growth. The current economic, regulatory and competitive environment requires us to identify and adapt rapidly to new opportunities and to refine our strategies. If we fail to identify new opportunities, revise our strategies on a timely basis or adapt to the changing environment, we may not be able to achieve our growth objectives.
Successful execution of our business strategies and plans impacts a number of factors, including our ability to generate sufficient earnings to maintain an adequate level of capital, our ability to generate sustained investment performance, our ability to meet regulatory requirements, our ability to manage our risk exposures effectively, our ability to attract and retain Clients and distributors, our ability to have the right set of diverse products and business mix, and our ability to reduce operating expenses while maintaining our ability to hire, retain and motivate key personnel. There is no certainty that we will be successful in implementing our business strategies or that these strategies will achieve our objectives. If our business strategies are not successful or are not executed effectively, we may not be able to achieve our growth objectives or react to market opportunities, which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.
Distribution Risk
Failure to achieve planned distribution scale could materially impact our financial and strategic objectives. This includes the inability to attract and retain intermediaries and agents at a cost that is financially feasible to the Company, or to develop digital sales and Client support capabilities and technologies. Distribution risk may also be influenced where our distribution or product strategy and related services (including digital sales and Client support capabilities and technologies) are not developed, modified or executed in line with our strategic objectives or in consideration of the changes in Client behaviour or our regulatory environment. In addition, the lack of a well-diversified distribution model in the jurisdictions in which we do business may cause over-reliance on agency channel or key partners.
We distribute our products through a variety of distribution channels, including direct sales agents, managing general agents, independent general agents, financial intermediaries, broker-dealers, banks, pension and benefits consultants and other third-party marketing organizations. We compete with other financial institutions to attract and retain these intermediaries and agents on the basis of products, compensation, support services and financial position. We also face the risk that our key distribution partners may undergo consolidation, change in ownership structure or change their distribution model which could materially impact sales and our growth targets. New distribution channels could emerge that may impact the effectiveness of our current distribution strategy. Distribution channels are growing rapidly in some businesses in certain countries, which may heighten the risks of market conduct
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 41
Annual Information Form 2021
and channel conflicts or overlaps. The capability to reach and retain Clients through use of digital technology and data analytics is becoming increasingly important in the insurance industry. While use of digital-based distribution channels may help us achieve or expand scale, these channels expose us to regulatory compliance and information security related risks. Our sales and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if we do not have the right distribution or product strategy and related technology or if we are unsuccessful in attracting and retaining intermediaries and agents.
Risks Relating to Mergers, Acquisitions, Divestitures and Strategic Investments
We regularly explore opportunities to selectively acquire other businesses or to divest ourselves of all or part of certain businesses, in support of our growth and strategic objectives. Any transaction that we enter into introduces a number of risks associated with economic, operational, strategic, financial, tax, legal, regulatory, compliance, and other factors.
There is a risk that we may be unable to make an appropriate acquisition in a desired market or business line or are unable to realize the financial and strategic benefits of the transactions due to competitive factors, regulatory requirements or other factors. There is a risk that the capital utilized to finance any transaction could limit our ability to deploy further capital to pursue other opportunities and initiatives. These risks could adversely impact our ability to achieve our financial and strategic objectives.
Our ability to realize the contemplated economic, financial, and strategic benefit of any transaction that we enter into is contingent on the effective separation and integration of the transferred businesses, restructuring or reorganization of related businesses, and motivating and retaining personnel to effectively execute these transactions. In addition, the integration of operations and differences in organizational culture may require the dedication of significant management resources, which may distract management’s attention from our day-to-day business. Anticipated cost synergies or other expected benefits may not materialize due to a failure to successfully integrate the acquired businesses with our existing operations. Any of these risks, if realized, could prevent us from achieving the expected results from a transaction or could impact our financial and strategic objectives.
Although we undertake extensive due diligence in connection with potential acquisitions, there may be liabilities or asset impairments that we fail to, or are unable to discover during our due diligence investigations. There could also be unforeseen liabilities or asset impairments, including goodwill impairments that arise in connection with acquisitions or divestitures of businesses. There is no assurance that we will achieve our financial or strategic objectives or anticipated cost savings following an acquisition.
The purchase and sale agreements that support acquisition transactions typically include indemnifications provided by the seller to the purchaser. These rights are typically limited by survival periods and limitations on the nature and amount of losses we may recover and there is a risk that these indemnifications will not be collectible or be sufficient to fully offset losses arising from the acquired business. We would also be exposed to the credit risk of the selling party with respect to its ability to pay if an indemnification provision is triggered.
Competitive Environment
Competition from insurance companies, banks, asset managers, mutual fund companies, financial planners and other service providers (including new entrants and non-traditional financial services companies) is intense, and could adversely affect our business in certain countries.
The businesses in which we engage are highly competitive and our ability to sell our products is dependent on many factors, including scale, price and yields offered, distribution channels, digital capabilities, financial strength ratings, range of product lines and product and service quality, brand strength, investment performance, historical dividend levels and the ability to provide value added services to distributors and Clients. In certain markets, some of our competitors may be superior to us on one or more of these factors. Our competitors have significant potential to disrupt our business through targeted strategies to reduce our market share which may include targeting our key people or bancassurance partners and other distributors or aggressively pricing their products. Our ability to achieve our business plans and strategies depends significantly upon our capacity to anticipate and respond quickly to these competitive pressures.
Technology is driving rapid change in the financial services sector and is enabling new entrants to compete or offer services to our competitors to enhance their ability to compete in certain segments of the insurance, wealth and asset management markets. The emergence of new technologies such as robotic process automation, artificial intelligence, blockchain and advanced analytics may have an impact on the financial services sector and how companies interact with their stakeholders. Our current competitors or new entrants may use these or other new technologies to provide services in various areas such as customized pricing, proactive outreach to Clients and targeted marketing in order to strengthen their Client relationships and influence Client behaviour. The impact of disruption from changing technology and innovation by traditional and non-traditional competitors who may offer a better user experience, functionality or lower priced products and may have lower distribution costs will require us to adapt at a more rapid pace and may create margin pressures. The risk of disruption may also impact our distribution models as new and low cost digital-based business models emerge in connection with the distribution of financial services and products, such as insurtechs and robo-advisors. These risks are evolving rapidly with an increasing number of digital users and are difficult to anticipate and respond to proactively, and may adversely impact our profitability and financial position.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 42
Annual Information Form 2021
Competitors may offer a greater selection of or lower cost products, which may create margin pressure in some of our businesses and impact our profitability and market share. In the asset management sector, there has been a trend among investors towards lower-fee passive investment products such as index- and other types of exchange-traded funds, which may impact our ability to attract and retain Clients in our actively managed products. Product development and product life cycles have shortened in many product segments, leading to more intense competition with respect to product features. This increases product development and administrative costs and reduces the time frame over which capital expenditures can be recovered. Regulatory and compliance costs also generally rise with increases in the range and complexity of our product portfolio.
We have many large and well-capitalized competitors with access to significant financial resources and in certain jurisdictions, these competitors have significant market share and established distribution relationships and brands. Among other things, the competition in these industries throughout the world has resulted in a trend towards the global consolidation of the financial services industry including, in particular, the insurance, banking and asset management sectors. To the extent that consolidation continues, we will increasingly face competition from large, well-capitalized financial services companies in many of the jurisdictions in which we operate. These larger companies have the ability to heavily invest in fundamental activities for sustained profitable growth and superior Client service in the life insurance industry such as brand equity, product development, technology, risk management, and distribution capability. There can be no assurance these developments will not adversely affect our businesses in certain countries.
Many of our insurance products, particularly those offered by the group segment, are renewed annually. Given this relatively high frequency of renewal activity, this business may be particularly exposed to adverse persistency through competitive market pressures.
Different accounting bases of reporting and regulatory capital requirements across multiple jurisdictions may cause us to be at a disadvantage compared to some of our competitors due to differences in reported earnings and due to these reporting and regulatory capital requirements.
Investment Performance
Investment performance risk is the possibility that we fail to achieve the desired return objectives on our investment portfolio, or that our asset management businesses fail to design or execute investment strategies in order to achieve competitive returns on the products and managed accounts offered by these businesses. Failure to achieve investment objectives may adversely affect our revenue and profitability through slower growth prospects and adverse impacts on policyholder or Client behaviour.
For our insurance businesses, the performance of our investment portfolio depends in part upon the level of and changes in interest rates, spreads, credit experience, equity prices, real estate values, the performance of the economy in general, the performance of the specific obligors included in these portfolios and other factors that are beyond our control. These changes can affect our net investment income substantially in any period.
In our asset management businesses, investment performance, along with achieving and maintaining superior distribution and Client services, is critical. If investment performance is less than that of our competitors or applicable benchmarks, we could lose existing and potential Clients. Similarly, a shift in investing trends and Client preference towards products that differ from our investment products or strategies, and in particular, the trend towards passive or alternative investment portfolios, could also lead to increased outflows. Accordingly, poor investment performance by our asset management operations or a shift in investing trends and Client preferences could adversely affect sales, increase outflows, reduce the level of assets under management or lead to a decline in the fee margin, which could adversely impact our revenues, income and capital position.
Changes in Legal and Regulatory Environment
Most of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation and supervision. Changes to legislation, regulations or government policies, or the manner in which they are interpreted or enforced, may require that we make significant changes to our strategy, may result in increased implementation costs and diversion of resources to manage the change. These changes could impact financial reporting, accounting processes, capital requirements, the regulatory framework for our products and services, the regulation of selling practices, sales intermediaries (such as bancassurance) and product offerings (such as coverage for prescription drugs), solvency requirements, executive compensation, and corporate governance practices and could impose restrictions on our foreign operations (such as limits on foreign ownership of local companies). All of these changes could have an adverse effect on our business and operations. Our failure to comply with existing and evolving regulatory requirements could also result in regulatory sanctions and could affect our relationships with regulatory authorities and our ability to execute our business strategies and plans.
Currently there are a number of regulatory developments in Canada and globally which could impact our business and the way we are regulated or supervised in various jurisdictions, which include the following:
•OSFI is considering alternatives for in-force variable annuity and segregated fund capital requirements, to be effective January 1, 2025, which may materially change the capital required to support our in-force variable annuity and segregated fund business.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 43
Annual Information Form 2021
•In Canada, there has been increased focus on enhancing the affordability of and accessibility to prescription drugs, including pressure from some provincial governments, the media and advocacy groups on the federal government to implement a form of nationalized pharmacare program. If implemented, a national pharmacare plan could impact our business in several ways, including premium income, our ability to offer prescription drug coverage, the price and level of coverage of other benefits we offer or are able to offer through our Canadian group benefits business, which in turn could impact plan renewals and retention of group Clients, plan member interaction and the value of other coverage offered by that business.
•Insurance and securities regulators continue to focus on client fairness, advisor conduct and related practices and are assessing product fees, compensation practices, sales practices and conflicts of interest. Regulators are also imposing higher standards that relate to interacting with clients in order to increase disclosure obligations related to fees; impose prohibitions or restrictions on the payment of certain types of commissions and service fees to agents, advisors and third-party distributors; resulting in changes to product features and sales and market practices by agents, advisors, product manufacturers and distributors. Examples of these changes include the Client Focused Reforms released by the Canadian Securities Administrators which fully came into effect on December 31, 2021, the Canadian Securities Administrators' ban on deferred sales charges expected to take effect in June 2022 and the implementation of the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario.
•In the U.S., states have enacted laws and regulations that require insurers to increase their level of regulatory reporting around risk management, solvency, and governance practices, and allow U.S. regulators to lead or participate in the group-wide supervision of certain international insurance groups. In December 2020, the NAIC finalized a group capital calculation that will be used by regulators to evaluate the capital position of insurance groups operating in the U.S.. The calculation does not set out specific capital requirements, but it could result in increased reporting and capital standards for insurance groups doing business in the U.S., including non-U.S. groups. Certain insurance holding company groups are exempt from the group capital calculation; however, its full impact on our business has not yet been determined.
•In June 2020, China passed the Hong Kong National Security Law ("NSL"), which is now in force in Hong Kong. Law enforcement authorities have extensive powers under the NSL, particularly in relation to investigations. In July 2020, the U.S. took steps to terminate the preferential treatment afforded to Hong Kong under the 1992 Hong Kong Policy Act. Additionally, then-U.S. President Trump signed into law the Hong Kong Autonomy Act (the “Act”) and issued an Executive Order, providing authority to impose primary sanctions against entities and individuals determined to have materially contributed to the undermining of Hong Kong’s autonomy. The Act also provides authority to impose secondary sanctions against non-U.S. financial institutions determined to have conducted a significant transaction for any individual or entity subject to primary sanctions under the Act. The U.S. Treasury Department has imposed primary sanctions on Chinese individuals, such as government officials in Hong Kong and Mainland China, under the Executive Order. China has similarly imposed sanctions on members of the U.S. Congress, heads of NGOs and former U.S. officials. Other countries, such as the United Kingdom, have also imposed similar sanctions on China. There may be heightened risks and uncertainties to our business in Hong Kong as a result of these developments.
•Regulators are increasing their focus on cybersecurity and new laws, regulations, directives and expectations have begun to emerge that will require the Company to continue to enhance its information security programs, increase regulatory reporting obligations and have an impact on the costs and resources associated with the Company’s information security activities.
•IBORs, including LIBOR, measure the average cost that banks pay to borrow from each other on an unsecured basis on a short-term basis. They are commonly used as a benchmark or reference rate for certain financial products and contracts. Certain IBORs will be discontinued or declared unrepresentative, including US dollar LIBOR which will be discontinued or declared unrepresentative either immediately after December 31, 2021 or immediately after June 30, 2023 (depending on the tenor). Uncertainty relating to the transition to alternative "risk free" rates, the use of ARRC or other fallback language, accounting and tax relief, and other factors related to reform may adversely affect our operations and cash flows and the value of and return on our Investments that are LIBOR or IBOR-based.
•Regulators in the various jurisdictions in which we operate have increased their focus on ESG matters, including the impact of climate change, and some regulators have taken steps towards introducing or have already introduced rules to address risks around ESG and climate change matters. We continue to monitor our risk management practices and disclosures as regulations and formal requirements evolve.
See the heading Regulatory Matters above for a description of our regulatory environment in Canada, the U.S., the UK, Asia and Bermuda and other examples of changes in regulation that may affect our business and operations. A summary of additional regulatory changes instituted by governments globally during 2021 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic are included in our 2021 MD&A under the headings "COVID-19" and "Risk Management - Risk Categories - Other Risks". See also the heading "Risks relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic" in this AIF.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 44
Annual Information Form 2021
Environmental and Social Risk
Our financial performance, operations, and reputation may be adversely affected if we do not adequately prepare for the direct or indirect negative impacts of environmental and social risks. Environmental risk includes environmental damage on properties owned or managed by us and climate change related physical and transition risks. These events and developments may include increased frequency and severity of natural or human-made environmental disasters, longer-term shifts in climate patterns, emerging regulatory and public policy developments, and their impacts on our operations, invested assets, suppliers, Clients and reputation. External factors such as stakeholder expectations around environmental performance, resource constraints and costs associated with adaptation are also potential sources of environmental risk. Risks that affect our Clients and our suppliers could have a negative impact on our operations and performance. Social risk includes but is not limited to public health issues and issues of inequality. These risks are considered in our key risk assessments. An environmental issue on a property owned or operated by us could have financial or reputational impacts.
A transition to a lower carbon economy could affect asset values. Portfolio investments in coal, conventional oil and oil sands producers, utilities and related fossil fuel industries, railways and pipelines, as well as markets that depend on these industries, may be subject to additional financial risk as a result of changes in regulation, cost of capital, consumer preferences and competition from renewable energy companies leading to lower overall profitability and/or stranded assets (assets for which the investment costs cannot be recovered as intended).
Physical climate impacts could affect investments in real assets such as real estate, commercial mortgages, and infrastructure, as well as our own operations, and operations and revenues of our Clients and businesses across our portfolios. Risks may result from increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events and from longer-term shifts in climate patterns.
If our Clients, shareholder groups, or other key stakeholders deem that our environmental, social, climate change or other sustainability-related practices are inadequate, our reputation and operations could be negatively affected. Failure to comply with an existing or potential Client's policies in these areas could disqualify us from bidding on, or earning business opportunities, or retaining existing business. We may also experience reduced access to capital markets if sustainability indices and/or investors find that our practices fall short of their criteria, which in turn could result in being removed from one or more of these indices or as an appropriate investment by investors.
As an owner/lessor of, investor in real estate, we may be impacted where environmental events damage or disrupt our underlying properties. Our businesses and the properties underlying our investments are subject to environmental laws and regulations in all key jurisdictions where we carry on business or hold investments. Consequently, we may experience environmental impacts or liabilities that could adversely affect the value of those businesses and properties, their ability to generate income, and costs related to any required compliance requirements or remediation. Through other invested assets, such as loans, bonds or equity investments, we could be subject to these impacts and negative consequences from environmental issues arising at the level of the issuer and/or specific asset. Our reputation and operations may be adversely affected if we or our tenants, borrowers, or other associated parties violate environmental regulations or best practices.
As noted above under Insurance Risk - Mortality and Morbidity Risk, environmental risks, including climate change risks have implications in areas such as catastrophic risk and the concentration risk presented by natural and human-made environmental disasters, which could impact our mortality and morbidity experience and our pricing and modeling assumptions as these events increase. For example, in our group benefits businesses, a localized event that affects the workplace of one or more of our Clients could cause a significant loss related to a concentration of claims under group policies.
In addition to the impacts noted above, failure to adequately prepare for the potential impacts of environmental risks, including those associated with climate change, may have other direct and indirect negative impacts. These may include business losses or disruption, including a shift in Client preferences or demands, resulting from:
•extreme weather conditions or other environmental disasters,
•longer-term shifts and impacts related to warming temperatures, the availability of food and water and other ongoing climate change impacts,
•wider and/or more rapid transmission of new and existing diseases through pandemics or otherwise, and
•other unforeseen human consequences.
Significant environmental changes and disasters may also reduce the overall level of economic activity in affected areas which could hurt our businesses, the value of our investments, our ability to offer products and services, or service our existing Clients.
These risks could also harm the financial condition of our reinsurers and insurers of property which we own, lease, have invested in or manage which may increase the risk of default on recoveries from these reinsurers and insurers, may increase the cost of reinsuring our business or the cost of insurance, and may result in reinsurance or insurance coverage being unavailable.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 45
Annual Information Form 2021
Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss (financial and non-financial) resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Operational risk is present in all of our business activities and encompasses a broad range of risks as described below. Operational risk is embedded in the practices utilized to manage other risks and, therefore, if not managed effectively, operational risk can impact our ability to manage other key risks.
Information Security and Privacy Risks
Information and technology are used in almost all aspects of our business and operations. As part of our Client strategy, we continue to enhance the digital side of our business to support and enable new business models and processes, that are more personal, proactive and predictive.
Our business and the successful implementation of our digital strategy are dependent on various factors including maintaining a secure environment for our Clients, employees and other parties' information. This requires the effective and secure use, management and oversight of information and physical assets. We engage with various stakeholders and leverage emerging technologies, including digital, mobile applications, cloud computing, artificial intelligence and robotic process automation. These technologies are used to collect, process and maintain information relating to business transactions and financial reporting, as well as the personal information of our Clients and employees. We also obtain services from a wide range of third-party service providers and have outsourced some business and information technology functions in various jurisdictions.
There continues to be an increasing number of information security compromises and privacy breaches across industry sectors, governments and individuals. The increasing scope and complexity of malicious activity poses a significant risk to our systems and these risks may be exacerbated by the breadth of our operations, our geographic footprint and the complexity of our technology systems. The risk of information security compromises and privacy breaches has also increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as individuals continue remote working arrangements. A serious security or privacy breach of either an internal or third-party service provider’s computer system that contains sensitive business, Client and/or employee information may result in business interruption, theft or misuse of confidential information, regulatory penalties and scrutiny, litigation, reputational damage and may have an adverse impact on current and future business opportunities with our Clients, employees and business relationships.
In particular, privacy breaches could occur and may result in unauthorized access and disclosure or use of personal information. Many jurisdictions in which we do business are developing and implementing reporting requirements relating to cybersecurity and more stringent consumer privacy legislation.
We have established security controls and processes that are intended to protect information and computer systems including information security risk assessments and privacy impact assessments. Notwithstanding these measures, the threat environment is rapidly and constantly changing, and there remains a possibility that our processes and controls could be unsuccessful in detecting or preventing a security breach. We remain vulnerable, and work with third parties who may also be vulnerable, to computer viruses and other types of malicious software, cyber-attacks and hacking attempts from unauthorized persons, the physical theft of computer systems, internal programming or human errors, fraud, or other disruptive problems or events. There is also a risk that certain internal controls fail, which could also exacerbate the consequences from such events.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 46
Annual Information Form 2021
Human Resources Risk
Our ability to achieve business objectives can be adversely affected if we are unable to attract, retain or effectively deploy resources with the in-depth knowledge and necessary skills required, or are unable to design compensation programs that effectively drive employee behaviour. Failure to manage Human Resources risk can also lead to direct financial and reputational loss including losses arising from activity that is inconsistent with Human Rights or employment laws or health and safety regulations.
Regulatory Compliance, Legal and Conduct Risk
We are subject to extensive regulatory oversight by financial services regulators in the jurisdictions in which we conduct business. In recent years, there has been an increased focus by regulators globally on Client fairness, conduct, anti-money laundering, privacy and data governance. Failure to comply with applicable laws or to conduct our business consistent with changing regulatory or public expectations could adversely impact our reputation and may lead to regulatory investigations, examinations, proceedings, settlements, penalties, fines, restrictions on our business, litigation or an inability to carry out our business strategy.
Our business is based on public trust and confidence and any damage to that trust or confidence could cause Clients not to buy, or to redeem our products. We also face a significant risk of litigation in the ordinary course of operating our business including the risk of class action lawsuits. In addition, we also face the risk of reputational damage or loss due to intentional, malicious, illegal or unethical acts such as fraud, misappropriation or circumvention of the law by internal and/or external parties including our employees, Clients, distributors, service providers or other third parties. Even with controls in place, these parties may behave in ways that could harm, injure or otherwise negatively impact our Clients and other stakeholders. For instance, we may not be able to fully monitor or control the manner of distribution of our products by third party firms or the submission of falsified applications or claims, despite the training program and compliance testing in place. We may suffer financial, reputation or other harm to our business if our products are distributed by such firms in an inappropriate manner or to Clients for whom such products are unsuitable. We are subject to anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, and the UK Bribery Act, each of which include significant civil and criminal penalties if breached. Our policies, including our Code of Conduct, require strict adherence to these laws. In the course of business, we, or our joint ventures, distributors or other non-controlled business partners, may from time to time transact with government entities. As a consequence, we may be at risk of censure under anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws if our or our partners' due diligence or other process and procedures when transacting with government entities are deemed inadequate.
Insurance and securities regulatory authorities and other government agencies in jurisdictions we operate regularly make inquiries, conduct investigations and administer market conduct examinations with respect to compliance with applicable anti-money laundering, bribery, corrupt practices, insurance, privacy and securities laws and regulations. As well, regulatory and governmental authorities, industry groups and rating agencies have developed initiatives regarding market conduct. In recent years, financial services regulators and other governmental authorities in many of the countries in which we operate have raised issues and commenced regulatory inquiries, investigations and proceedings with respect to current and past business practices in the financial services industry, and have given greater emphasis to the investigation of those practices. For example, regulatory reviews and investigations have been made concerning suitability of sales of certain products, payment of commissions and other fees to intermediaries, market timing and late trading in investment funds, governance practices, allegations of improper life insurance pricing, sales and compensation practices by life and annuity insurers and mutual fund dealers, including related conflicts of interest and anti-money laundering controls and procedures. Current and future regulatory investigations, examinations, proceedings, and civil actions arising out of such matters could adversely affect our reputation, and may result in settlements, penalties, fines, restrictions on our business, litigation or an inability to carry out our business strategy or may cause us to make changes to our business and compliance practices, policies and procedures, which in turn could impact our profitability and future financial results and increase our litigation risk.
Under the Insurance Act and the Supervisory Information (Insurance) Regulations (Canada) and pursuant to similar restrictions in other jurisdictions, we are prohibited from directly or indirectly disclosing any supervisory information relating to SLF Inc., Sun Life Assurance and their affiliates.
Information Technology Risk
The use of technology and computer systems is essential in supporting and maintaining business operations. We use technology to support virtually all aspects of our business and operations. The rapidly changing business environment increases the risk of our technology strategy not being agile enough to adapt to new business demands in a timely manner leading to financial losses, increased costs and the inability to meet Client needs.
Initiatives supporting our business strategy rely on developing innovative information technology solutions and upgrading our existing systems on a timely basis to meet business needs. Although every reasonable precaution is taken to ensure information technology systems remain available, stable and current, it is not possible to fully eliminate all risk. Some changes and upgrades are extremely complex and there is a chance that an undetected technical flaw may exist, which, when implemented, stops or disrupts critical information technology systems or business applications or leads to operational errors such as incorrect financial reporting.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 47
Annual Information Form 2021
Third-Party Risk
We engage in a variety of third-party relationships, including with distributors, independent contractors, outsourcing service providers and suppliers. Our profitability or reputation could be impacted if these third parties are unable to meet their ongoing service commitments or fail to perform to expected standards.
An interruption in our relationship with certain third parties or other parties engaged by such third parties, the impairment of their reputation or creditworthiness, their failure to provide contracted services in the manner agreed or in accordance with applicable laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect our business objectives or expose us to regulatory fines and/or reputational harm. Even with contingency plans developed for our material third party arrangements, there can be no assurance that we would be able to transition to alternate sources for these arrangements in a timely manner, at reasonable cost, or with minimal disruption to our stakeholders.
Business Disruption Risk
Our businesses are dependent on the availability of trained employees, physical locations to conduct operations and access to technology. A significant business disruption to our operations can result if one or more of these key elements are negatively impacted.
Although we have implemented and periodically test our business continuity, crisis management and disaster recovery plans, a sustained failure of one or more of our key business processes or systems could materially and adversely impact our business, operations and employees. These failures can result from disruption of our processes and systems due to utility outages, fires, floods, severe storms, cyber-attacks, terrorism and other human-made attacks, natural disasters and other events. We have experienced increased incidences and impacts of disruption due to weather events such as tropical storms and flooding in the geographies in which we operate, as well as earthquakes and pandemic risks. In addition to these key business processes and system disruptions, these unanticipated events, including disease pandemics, can also negatively affect staff, preventing them from working or from operating business processes. Business disruptions can also occur due to changes in environmental risk and related impacts have been highlighted above under the heading Environmental and Social Risk. Also, because some of our business processes are performed by third parties and some of our systems interface with or are dependent on third-party systems, we could experience service interruptions if these third-party operations or systems fail.
Model Risk
We use complex models to support many business functions including product development and pricing, capital management, valuation, financial reporting, planning, hedging, asset-liability management, risk management and advanced analytics (such as artificial intelligence, predictive modeling and decision making algorithms). Model risk is the risk of loss, either in the form of financial loss, inappropriate or poor business decisions, damage to reputation, or other adverse impact, arising from inaccurate model outputs or incorrect use or interpretation of model outputs.
Model risk can arise from many sources including inappropriate methodologies, assumptions or parameters, incorrect use of source data, inaccurate or untimely source data, incorrect application or operator errors, increasing product complexity and regulatory expectations. If the models' methodologies and assumptions are not appropriately set or well controlled, or data or implementation errors occur in the models, this could result in a negative impact on our results and financial position.
Many of our methods and models for managing risk and exposures are based upon the use of observed historical precedents for financial market behaviour, credit experience and insurance risks. As a result, these methods may not fully predict future risk exposures, which can be significantly greater than our historical measures indicate. Other risk management methods depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, Clients, catastrophic occurrence or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible to us. However, this information may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date, properly evaluated or necessarily indicative of ultimate realized experience. As we review and update our models, changes might be made to valuation methods and assumptions, which may impact our results.
Information Management Risk
As an international provider of financial services, we deal with extensive information across a number of countries. Information management risk is the inability to capture, manage, retain and appropriately dispose of business records, the inability to provide data that is fit for purpose, accurate, complete or timely to support business decisions, and the inability to manage data location and cross-border appropriately. Failure to manage these risks could have financial or reputational impacts, and may lead to regulatory proceedings, penalties and litigation.
Additional information on operational risk can be found in the Risk Factors section of this AIF.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 48
Annual Information Form 2021
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the possibility that we will not be able to fund all cash outflow commitments and collateral requirements as they fall due. This includes the risk of being forced to sell assets at depressed prices resulting in realized losses on sale. This risk also includes restrictions on our ability to efficiently allocate capital among our subsidiaries due to various market and regulatory constraints on the movement of funds. Our funding obligations arise in connection with the payment of policyholder benefits, expenses, reinsurance settlements, asset purchases, investment commitments, interest on debt, and dividends on common and preferred shares. Sources of available cash flow include general fund premiums and deposits, investment related inflows (such as maturities, principal repayments, investment income and proceeds of asset sales), proceeds generated from financing activities, and dividends and interest payments from subsidiaries. We have various financing transactions and derivative contracts under which we may be required to pledge collateral or to make payments to our counterparties for the decline in market value of specified assets. The amount of collateral or payments required may increase under certain circumstances (such as changes to interest rates, credit spreads, equity markets or foreign exchange rates), which could adversely affect our liquidity.
Under stress conditions, increases in funding obligations can occur in conjunction with reductions in cost effective sources of available cash inflow. In particular, adverse stress scenarios could involve increases in policyholder cash surrenders and terminations and decreases in the amounts of premiums and deposits being generated by existing and new Clients. Adverse capital market conditions may also be associated with a reduction in available market liquidity and clearing prices for expected asset sales, and reductions in the level of cash inflows (dividends, interest payments and expected maturities) on continuing portfolio investments. These developments could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
We engage in various transactions including repurchase agreements and other capital markets transactions to meet short-term cash requirements. The cost and our ability to execute these transactions may be negatively impacted by illiquid or volatile markets. Disruption in the financial markets may limit our access to capital in the event we are required to seek additional liquidity to operate our businesses. This will result in increased costs to raise capital coupled with less desirable terms or maturities which would decrease future profitability and financial flexibility.
SLF Inc. is a holding company for its insurance, wealth and asset management subsidiaries and does not have significant operations of its own. Dividends and interest payments from its subsidiaries are its principal sources of cash. If the cash received from its subsidiaries is insufficient, then it may be required to raise debt or equity externally or sell some of its assets. We are subject to various regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The ability of SLF Inc.'s subsidiaries to pay dividends and transfer funds is regulated in certain jurisdictions and may require local regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of specific conditions in certain circumstances.
In addition, rating agencies publish credit ratings of securities issued by SLF Inc. and its subsidiaries, which have an impact on the interest rates paid by those companies on borrowed funds. A material downgrade in the issuer credit ratings could limit our access to capital or increase the cost of borrowing and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
We have established financing arrangements that support NAIC statutory reserves for universal life policies issued by Sun Life Assurance in the U.S. Our ability to support these reserves with these financing structures can be negatively impacted by market conditions and regulatory changes. Further, these financings, in all or in part, are treated as operating leverage by the rating agencies. If, due to a change in rating agency methodology or position, the rating agencies cease to treat these financings as operating leverage, without providing any grandfathering provisions, there may be an adverse impact on our credit and financial strength ratings.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 49
Annual Information Form 2021
Other Risks
Risks relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Pandemics, epidemics or outbreaks of an infectious disease could have an adverse impact on our results, business, financial condition or liquidity, and could result in changes to the way we operate. The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures imposed by governments around the world to limit its spread including travel restrictions, business closures, social distancing protocols, school closures, quarantines, and restrictions on gatherings and events, have disrupted the global economy, financial markets, supply chains, business activity and productivity in unprecedented ways. The duration and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the countries in which we operate are varied and cannot currently be determined. Containment measures continue to impact global economic activity, including the pace and magnitude of recovery as well as contributing to increased market volatility, supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures, and changes to the macroeconomic environment. Governments, monetary authorities, regulators and financial institutions, have taken, and continue to take, actions in support of the economy and financial system. These actions include fiscal, monetary and other financial measures to increase liquidity, and to provide financial aid to individuals and businesses. While some programs and temporary measures have come to an end, others remain in place or have continued to be developed in an effort to support the economy. Additional risks are emerging around governments' withdrawal of COVID-19 pandemic support measures, and how they will seek to finance the unprecedented level of support. If the COVID-19 pandemic is prolonged, the adverse impact on the global economy could deepen, augmenting financial market declines or volatility, corporate insolvency risks and negative household wealth impacts. The continuing or worsening of the economic and market conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and impact on Clients, industries and individual countries could have a material adverse effect on our businesses including sales, fee income, investment performance, expenses, results of operations, corporate reputation and financial condition. Sustained adverse effects could negatively impact profitability and also make it difficult for us to access capital markets, could impact our liquidity and capital position, or may result in downgrades in our credit ratings. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business, results of operations, corporate reputation and financial condition, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in this document and "J - Risk Management" in our 2021 MD&A. This includes, but is not limited to:
•Market risks, such as equity, interest rates and spread, real estate, and foreign currency risks, including impact on fee income;
•Insurance risk, including higher than expected mortality and, morbidity claims and adverse policyholder behaviour including but not limited to higher than expected policy lapses, withdrawals, and surrenders;
•Credit risk, including defaults, impairments and downgrades;
•Business and strategic risk including economic and political risk, business strategy implementation risk, distribution risk, expense risk, changes in Client behaviour, sales, investment performance, and changes in legal and regulatory environment;
•Operational risk, including information security and privacy risk, human resources risks, regulatory compliance, legal and conduct risk, information technology risk, processing risk, third-party risk, and business disruption risk, and change management risk with the need to quickly implement and execute new programs and procedures to support Clients, advisors, employees, products, and services; and
•Liquidity risk including collateral, and payment deferrals on invested assets or policyholder insurance premium impacts.
While rising vaccination rates have supported an easing of containment measures in some geographies, progress towards re-opening has been accompanied by resurgences in the spread of COVID-19 including variants and the re-imposition of restrictions in other geographies. The overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is still uncertain and dependent on the progression of the virus, including variants, mass vaccine production and distribution, vaccine efficacy, public acceptance of containment measures and vaccine adoption, the subsequent reduction in rates of infection and the actions taken by governments, monetary authorities, regulators, financial institutions, businesses and individuals, which could vary by country and result in differing outcomes. Given the extent of the circumstances, it is difficult to reliably measure or predict the potential impact of this uncertainty on our future financial results.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 50
Annual Information Form 2021
IFRS 17 and 9
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts ("IFRS 17") and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments ("IFRS 9") are effective for Canadian insurance companies for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023.
IFRS 17 will replace IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts and establishes the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of insurance contracts.
IFRS 9 will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and includes guidance on the classification and measurement of financial instruments, impairment of financial assets and hedge accounting.
Risks related to IFRS 17 and 9 include:
•Operational risk - the standards requires a more expansive set of data, introduces complex estimation techniques, computational requirements and disclosures, which necessitate a major transformation to various actuarial and financial reporting processes, tools, and systems.
•Business and strategic risk - the standards may create additional volatility in our financial results and capital position. Volatility of reported results may require changes to business strategies and the introduction of new or modified non-GAAP measures to explain our results. The impact to business strategy could include changes to hedging and investment strategy, product strategy and the use of reinsurance and, as a result, could impact our exposures to other risks such as counterparty risk and liquidity risk.
•Regulatory Capital risk - the regulatory capital framework in Canada currently based on IFRS 4 will align with IFRS 17 effective January 1, 2023. The impact to Sun Life from this change is currently uncertain. While OSFI has stated that it intends to maintain capital frameworks consistent with current capital policies and to minimize potential capital impacts at the industry level, the impact for individual companies may vary. OSFI will make changes to the LICAT guideline to reflect IFRS 17 and is consulting directly with key stakeholders. LICAT guideline changes for Segregated Fund Guarantee capital are also planned to take effect January 1, 2025. OSFI has been engaging the industry in testing of new Segregated Fund Guarantee capital requirements, and the impact will not be known until the final calibrations are completed.
•Impact on tax - in certain jurisdictions, including Canada, the implementation of IFRS 17 may impact tax positions and other financial metrics that are dependent upon IFRS accounting values.
International Operations
The future success of our businesses in our international operations depends in large part on our ability to grow and compete in the markets where we operate. Challenges in these markets pose strategic and execution risk including our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and executives with local experience and critical skills, political, legal, economic, competition or other risks, risks associated with joint venture operations, developing and executing our risk management practices, and our ability to attract, retain, expand and diversify distribution channels.
If we are unable to attract, retain and engage qualified employees and executives with relevant experience and critical business skills, our ability to grow our business in our international operations as quickly as planned may be limited. Competition for qualified employees and distribution partners in our international operations, in particular the Asian markets, continues to be strong and could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain talent.
Our international operations may face political, legal and regulatory, economic, competitive, operational or other risks that we may not face in our domestic operations. Examples of this type of risk are the risk of changes in regulation, political risks due to changes in government, discriminatory regulation, political instability, nationalization or expropriation of assets, changes to the maximum level of non-domestic ownership, price controls and exchange controls or other restrictions that could prevent us from transferring funds from these operations out of the countries in which they operate or converting local currencies we hold into Canadian dollars or other currencies.
Capital markets in certain international markets may not have the same depth, liquidity or range of investment options generally available in other markets in which we operate. In particular, the more limited availability of long-duration assets exposes our Asian operations to higher asset-liability management costs and potential risk.
We have entered into joint venture arrangements in certain markets in Asia, where we may have a lesser degree of control over these businesses that may expose us to additional operational, financial, compliance and legal risks. We may be dependent on our joint venture counterparty for capital, product distribution, local market knowledge, or other resources. Our ability to exercise management control or influence over these joint ventures and the success of our investments in them will depend on the cooperation between the joint venture participants and the terms of the joint venture agreements, which allocate control among the joint venture participants. If we are unable to effectively manage these joint ventures, or any joint venture counterparty fails to meet its obligations under the joint venture arrangement, encounters financial difficulty, elects to alter, modify or terminate the relationship, or a joint venture does not comply with local legislation or regulations, we may be unable to achieve our objectives and our results of operations and brand may be negatively impacted.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 51
Annual Information Form 2021
Capital Adequacy
Capital adequacy risk is the risk that our capital position is not or will not be sufficient to withstand adverse economic conditions, to maintain our financial strength, to allow us and our subsidiaries to support ongoing operations and to take advantage of opportunities for expansion, and to support the risk taking activity in pursuit of our business objectives.
The strength of our capital position depends in part upon the level of and changes in interest rates and equity prices, credit experience, mortality and morbidity experience, currency rate fluctuations and our overall profitability.
Various factors such as declining equity markets, downgrades in ratings, changes in interest rates, changes in credit spreads on corporate bonds and asset backed securities, lower earnings and inability to access capital markets on a timely basis may negatively impact our capital ratios, and may impair our financial position and our ability to execute our business strategies and plans. In addition, regulatory changes being considered by other regulators world-wide may adversely impact the capital ratios of SLF Inc. and its insurance subsidiaries. These factors may impair our financial position and our ability to execute our business strategy.
Credit and Financial Strength Ratings
Financial strength ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding the financial ability of an insurance company to meet its obligations under insurance policies. Credit ratings indicate the opinions of rating agencies regarding an issuer's ability to meet the terms of debt, preferred share and Tier 1 hybrid capital obligations in a timely manner, and are important factors in a company’s overall funding profile and ability to access external capital. A downgrade by a rating agency in the credit ratings of securities issued by SLF Inc. and its subsidiaries or the financial strength ratings of SLF Inc.'s insurance company subsidiaries could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The financial strength rating of an insurance company is a key competitive factor in marketing its products and in attracting and retaining agents and distributors. If our credit or financial strength ratings are downgraded, our financial condition, competitive position and results of operations could be negatively impacted in many ways, including:
•Reducing new sales of insurance products, annuities and investment products;
•Requiring us to reduce prices for products and services to remain competitive;
•Higher level of surrenders and withdrawals;
•Higher reinsurance costs;
•Increasing our cost of capital and limiting our access to the capital markets, thus reducing our financial flexibility;
•Reducing our ability to enter into normal course derivative or hedging transactions and increasing the costs associated with such transactions; and
•Adversely affecting our relationships with our advisors and third-party distributors of our products.
In addition, downgrades in our credit or financial strength ratings below thresholds specified in certain of our derivative agreements, reinsurance agreements and other agreements could result in the counterparties to those agreements having the right to terminate those agreements or to require that we provide support for those agreements in the form of collateral or letters of credit.
Changes in methodologies and criteria used by rating agencies could also result in downgrades that do not reflect changes in the general economic conditions or our financial condition.
Additional information concerning our ratings is provided in this AIF under the heading Security Ratings and in our 2021 MD&A under the heading Financial Strength.
Tax Matters
The validity and measurement of tax benefits associated with various tax positions taken or expected to be taken in our tax filings are a matter of tax law and are subject to interpretation. Tax laws are complex and their interpretation requires significant judgment. The provision for income taxes reflects management’s interpretation of the relevant tax laws and its best estimate of income tax implications of the transactions and events during the period. There can be a risk that tax authorities could differ in their interpretation of the relevant laws and could assert that tax positions taken by the company give rise to a need for reassessment, including reassessment under specific or general anti-avoidance rules or transfer pricing provisions.
The assessment of additional taxes, interest and penalties or damage to the Company’s reputation could be materially adverse to our future results of operations and financial position.
Under the liability method of accounting for income taxes, deferred tax assets are recognized for the carryforward of unused tax losses and tax credits, as well as amounts that have already been recorded in the financial statements, but will not result in deductible amounts in determining taxable income until future periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent of the probability that taxable profit will be available against which the future tax deductions and unused tax losses can be utilized.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 52
Annual Information Form 2021
At the end of each reporting period, we must assess the value of our deferred tax assets. The determination of our deferred tax assets is dependent upon projections of future taxable profits. Our projections require significant judgments and estimates about future events, including global economic conditions and the future profitability of our businesses. If the profitability of our businesses is lower than our projections or if our outlook diminishes significantly, we may be required to reduce the value of our deferred tax assets. Any change to our deferred tax assets could have a material adverse impact on our future results of operations and financial position.
We are also subject to changing income tax regulations. We currently have an effective income tax rate that is lower than the Canadian statutory income tax rate for corporations. The Company reflects favourable tax impacts in its financial statements from certain tax benefits, including but not limited to tax-exempt investment income, dividends received deductions, tax credits (from certain investments or from taxes paid on foreign source income), and favourable tax rates in certain jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, many of our life insurance products benefit Clients with preferred tax treatment under various tax regimes. For example life insurance policies and annuity contracts in the U.S. and Canada allow for the deferral or elimination of taxation on earnings (inside buildup) accrued under the policy. There is a risk that tax legislation, administrative guidance or legislative developments could lessen or eliminate some of the benefits currently available to the Company or its policyholders. This risk could result in lower product sales or increased lapses of policies, and could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial position.
From time to time, governments in countries in which we operate enact changes to statutory corporate income tax rates. A change in income tax rate requires us to review and re-measure our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the date of substantive enactment. As of December 31, 2021, the Company reported a $1,526 millions net deferred tax asset in its Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, primarily in Canada. Any future tax rate reductions in jurisdictions where we carry a net deferred tax asset could result in a reduction in the carrying value of the deferred tax asset and a corresponding income tax expense at the time of substantive enactment of a rate reduction.
In light of significant deficits incurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments may seek to raise corporate tax rates or introduce further base-broadening measures, which could materially impact our tax expense.
Legal and Regulatory Proceedings
We are regularly involved in legal actions, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. Information on legal and regulatory proceedings is provided in Note 23 of our 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference.
Since January 1, 2020, (i) no penalties or sanctions have been imposed against Sun Life by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision; (ii) Sun Life has not entered into any settlement agreements with a court relating to Canadian securities legislation or with a Canadian securities regulatory authority and (iii) no penalties or sanctions have been imposed against Sun Life by a Canadian securities regulatory authority, other than nominal late filing fees, or by a court relating to Canadian securities legislation.
Additional Information
Additional information including directors' and officers' remuneration and indebtedness, principal holders of SLF Inc.'s securities, securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans and interests of informed persons in material transactions, if applicable, is contained in SLF Inc.'s information circular for its most recent annual meeting of security holders that involved the election of directors. Additional financial information is provided in SLF Inc.'s MD&A and consolidated financial statements for its most recently completed financial year.
Requests for copies of these documents may be sent to the Corporate Secretary of SLF Inc. at 1 York Street, 31st Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 0B6. Copies of these documents and other additional information related to SLF Inc. are available at www.sunlife.com, www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov.
Sun Life Financial Inc. | sunlife.com 53
APPENDIX ASUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC. AND
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA (“THE CORPORATION”)
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee (the “Committee”) is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors (the “Board”) in overseeing the integrity of financial statements and related information provided to shareholders and other stakeholders, compliance with financial regulatory requirements, adequacy and effectiveness of the internal controls implemented and maintained by management, and assessing the qualifications, independence and performance of the external auditor.
1.Duties and Responsibilities
In assisting the Board with its oversight role, the Committee:
1.1Financial Reporting
a)Reviews with management and the External Auditor and makes recommendations to the Board on the approval of the quarterly unaudited and the annual audited consolidated financial statements (“Quarterly and Annual Financial Statements”), including the notes thereto, Management’s Discussion and Analysis and related news release.
b)In conducting its review of the Quarterly and Annual Financial Statements:
i.reviews the reported and underlying earnings;
ii.discusses with the President & Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer any significant issues raised in connection with the certifications relating to financial disclosure and controls that those officers are required to file with securities regulatory authorities;
iii.receives reports from the Chief Actuary on the parts of the quarterly and annual audited consolidated financial statements prepared by that officer;
iv.reviews with management and the External Auditor the Corporation’s principal accounting and actuarial practices and policies; and
v.considers emerging industry, regulatory and accounting standards and the possible impact on the Corporation’s principal accounting practices and policies, including consideration of the use of non- International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) measures.
c)Periodically reviews tax matters.
d)Reviews the annual report on litigation matters or other reports, as required.
e)At the request of the Chair of the Committee, reviews finance, accounting and tax related aspects of material transactions that are being proposed by the Corporation.
1.2External Auditor
a)Reviews the External Auditor’s audit findings reports and (i) seeks assurances from the External Auditor that the financial statements, including the notes thereto, fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation; (ii) assures itself that the External Auditor is satisfied that the accounting estimates and judgements made by management, and management’s selection of accounting principles, reflect an appropriate
application of International Financial Reporting Standards; (iii) discusses with the External Auditor any significant changes that were required in the external audit plan; and (iv) discusses any significant issues raised with management during the course of the audit or review and oversees the resolution of any disagreements, including any restrictions on the scope of activities or access to information, and those matters that are required to be discussed under generally accepted auditing standards.
b)Discusses with the External Auditor on a quarterly basis the results of quarterly review procedures over the financial statements, including discussions on key areas of judgement, significant transactions in the quarter and the progress against the external audit plan.
c)Reviews the independence of the External Auditor, including the requirements relating to such independence under the laws governing the Corporation, the applicable rules of stock exchanges on which the Corporation’s securities are listed, and regulatory bodies with responsibility for establishing auditor independence requirements and policies and at least annually receives and reviews with the External Auditor its written statement delineating relationships with the Corporation and, if necessary, recommends that the Board take appropriate action to satisfy itself of the External Auditor’s independence and accountability to the Committee, the Board and shareholders.
d)Appraises the qualifications and performance of the External Auditor, including timing and implementation of the rotation of the lead audit partner, and recommends to the Board the appointment, or if so determined by the Committee the replacement, of the External Auditor, subject to the approval of the shareholders.
e)Reviews and approves the scope and terms of the External Auditor’s engagement, and reviews and recommends for approval by the Board the engagement letter and remuneration of the External Auditor.
f)Reviews and approves the Restricting Use of External Auditor Policy which outlines the services for which the External Auditor can be engaged, the approval process for such services and the policy regarding the employment of former employees of the External Auditor.
g)Determines, reviews and approves the services to be performed by the External Auditor and the fees to be paid to the External Auditor for audit, audit-related and other services permitted by law and in accordance with the Restricting Use of External Auditor Policy.
h)Reviews with the External Auditor and management the overall scope of the external audit plan, quality control procedures and the resources that the External Auditor will devote to the audit.
i)Discusses with the External Auditor the financial and control-related aspects of material transactions that are being proposed by the Corporation.
1.3Internal Control
a)Requires management to implement and maintain appropriate systems, processes and controls to ensure accurate, complete and timely financial reporting and evaluates the effectiveness of such processes and controls, and ensures that appropriate action is being taken to address any material internal control deficiencies.
b)Reviews at least annually and makes recommendations to the Board on the approval of the Corporation’s Internal Control Framework.
c)Reviews management’s quarterly reports on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting, including any evolving standards over environmental, social and governance (ESG) and/or climate related disclosures.
d)Periodically meets with the Business Group Chief Financial Officers and Chief Internal Auditors to review internal controls over financial reporting, resources, organizational structure and priorities.
1.4Internal Audit
a)Reviews the Chief Auditor’s quarterly reports on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting.
b)Reviews and approves the annual internal audit plan and any significant changes to the internal audit plan, reviews any restrictions on the scope of activities or access to information in the course of the audit, and oversees the coordination of the internal audit plan with the External Auditor’s audit plan.
c)Together with the Chair of the Audit Committee, interacts with the Chief Auditor as required to support fulfilment of the Chief Auditor’s mandate; the Chief Auditor reports on a functional basis to the Chair of the Audit Committee and administratively to the President & Chief Executive Officer.
1.5Resources and Talent
a)Reviews, at least annually, and approves changes to the statements of mandate, responsibility and authority of the Chief Actuary, Chief Auditor and Chief Financial Officer and the organizational structure of the Actuarial, Finance and Internal Audit functions.
b)Reviews, at least annually, the adequacy of the authority, independence and resources of the Chief Actuary, Chief Auditor and Chief Financial Officer.
c)Reviews, at least annually, management’s reporting on matters related to information technology affecting the Corporation’s finance and actuarial systems.
d)Approves the objectives and reviews the effectiveness of the Chief Actuary, Chief Auditor and Chief Financial Officer and the Actuarial, Internal Audit and Finance functions annually.
e)Reviews succession plans for the roles of Chief Actuary, Chief Auditor, Chief Financial Officer and other senior management roles overseen by the Committee and the Chair of the Committee is consulted in advance in connection with the appointment, reassignment, replacement or dismissal of the Chief Actuary, Chief Auditor and Chief Financial Officer, and annually on the performance assessment and compensation awarded to those individuals.
f)Requires the Chief Actuary, Chief Auditor and Chief Financial Officer to report on any material disagreements with other members of senior management relating to the business, and reviews how such matters are being addressed.
g)Discusses the qualifications for and determines whether a member of the Committee is a financial expert, and in conjunction with the Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee, ensures the ongoing financial literacy of Committee members.
1.6Regulatory
a)Reviews matters within its mandate that are addressed in the regular examination and similar reports received from regulatory agencies, including management’s responses and recommendations.
b)Reviews and discusses with the External Auditor and Chief Actuary such reports and regulatory returns of the Corporation as may be specified by law.
c)Reviews with the External Auditor any regulatory matters that pertain to the External Auditor.
2.Composition and Procedures
2.1Membership
a)The Committee is composed of not less than three Directors, including a Committee Chair, appointed by the Board on an annual basis following each annual meeting.
b)Each member of the Committee shall be independent as defined in the Director Independence Policy and financially literate. In the Board’s judgment, a member of the Committee is financially literate if, after seeking and receiving any explanations or information from senior financial management or the External Auditor of the Corporation that the member requires, the member is able to read and understand the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation to the extent sufficient to be able to intelligently ask, and to evaluate the answers to, probing questions about the material aspects of those financial statements. In addition, the Committee shall have at least one member that the Board has determined is an audit committee financial expert.
c)Committee membership is reviewed in connection with appointments to the Committee and annually by the Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee to ensure the Committee as a whole includes members with the competencies, experience and expertise required to fulfill the Committee’s mandate and that the financial literacy and the audit committee financial expert requirements (as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission) are met.
d)Any member of the Committee may be removed or replaced at any time by the Board and the Board shall fill vacancies on the Committee.
2.2Meetings and Procedures
a)A meeting of the Committee may be called at any time by the Chair of the Board (the “Board Chair”) or by any member of the Committee.
b)The Committee meets as frequently as necessary, but not less than four times a year.
c)A quorum at any meeting of the Committee shall be three members.
d)The Chair of the Committee reports to the Board after each Committee meeting.
e)The External Auditor reports to the Committee and receives notice of and may attend all Committee meetings.
f)The Committee holds a private session at each meeting of the Committee for members only and at each regularly scheduled meeting with each of the Chief Actuary, Chief Auditor, Chief Financial Officer and representatives of the External Auditor, and with the Chief Risk Officer
and Chief Compliance Officer, as appropriate, and those individuals have unrestricted access to Committee members between meetings.
g)The Committee will review its Forward Agenda, as required, and on an annual basis, the Committee will review this Charter and, where necessary, recommend changes to the Board for approval.
h)The Committee will review the minutes and list of follow up items of each Committee meeting.
i)This Charter will be posted on the Corporation’s website and the Committee will prepare a report on its activities for inclusion in the annual Proxy Circular.
j)The Committee shall undertake and review with the Board an annual performance evaluation of the Committee and the Committee Chair.
3.Access to Management and Independent Advisors
The Committee:
a)Has full and unrestricted access to management and, in consultation with the Board Chair, may engage any special advisors it deems necessary to provide independent advice at the expense of the Corporation.
b)Establishes the scope and frequency of the independent reviews of the Actuarial, Finance and Internal Audit functions.