
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Warranty provisions
The Group’s product warranties primarily cover
expected costs to repair or replace components
with defects or functional errors. Warranties are
usually granted for a two-year period from legal
transfer of the turbine, however, in certain cases,
a warranty of up to five years is granted.
We focused on this area as the amounts
involved are significant and the completeness
and valuation of the expected outcome of
warranty cases require significant Management
judgement and estimates. This includes the use
of significant assumptions concerning expected
failure rates and expected repair or replacement
costs.
Refer to Note 3.6 in the Consolidated financial
statements.
We carried out risk assessment procedures in order to obtain an understanding
of IT systems, business processes and relevant controls regarding provision
for warranty. For the controls, we assessed whether they were designed and
implemented to effectively address the risk of material misstatement. For
selected controls that we planned to rely on, we tested whether they were
performed on a consistent basis.
We performed substantive audit procedures on the methodology, data,
assumptions and model used by Management to calculate the provisions and
reviewed a sample of specific warranty cases.
We challenged the significant assumptions applied in the valuation of provisions
by checking and corroborating the inputs used to calculate the provisions,
including interviewing project managers, cost controllers and Management
regarding individual cases. We assessed specific warranty provisions held for
individual cases to evaluate whether the warranty provisions were sufficient to
cover future expected costs and whether the disclosures included in the notes
appropriately reflected the estimation uncertainty.
Further, we assessed the level of historical warranty claims to assess whether
the total warranty provisions held at year-end were sufficient to cover
expected costs in light of known and expected cases.
Tax risks
The Group operates in a complex multinational
tax environment and the Group is part in tax
cases with domestic and foreign tax authorities.
The Group has recognised provisions in respect
of uncertain tax positions. Furthermore, the
Group has recognised write-downs on deferred
tax assets related to the uncertainty about
potential future utilisation of these tax assets.
We focused on this area as the amounts
involved are material and as the valuation of the
provision and deferred tax assets is associated
with significant accounting estimates and
judgements.
Refer to Note 5.1 and Note 5.2 in the
Consolidated financial statements.
We carried out risk assessment procedures in order to obtain an
understanding of IT systems, business processes and relevant controls
regarding recognition for uncertain tax positions and valuation of deferred
tax assets. For the controls, we assessed whether they were designed and
implemented to effectively address the risk of material misstatement. For
selected controls that we planned to rely on, we tested whether they were
performed on a consistent basis.
In understanding and evaluating Management’s accounting estimates and
judgements, we considered the status of recent tax authority audits and
enquiries, the outcome of previous claims, judgmental positions taken in tax
returns and estimates and developments in the tax environment.
We used PwC tax specialists to evaluate and challenge the adequacy of
Management’s significant assumptions and read correspondence with tax
authorities to assess Management’s significant accounting estimates.
We evaluated the Group’s model for valuation of deferred tax assets, including
the data used to estimate the expected future taxable income. We also
considered the historical outcome of accounting estimates made in prior
periods.
We reviewed the disclosures included in the notes and sample tested
disclosures to accounting records.
Statement on Management’s Review
Management is responsible for Management’s Review, pages
2-46 and pages 120-130.
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover
Management’s Review, and we do not express any form of
assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our
responsibility is to read Management’s Review and, in doing
so, consider whether Management’s Review is materially
inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge
obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially
misstated.
Moreover, we considered whether Management’s Review
includes the disclosures required by the Danish Financial
Statements Act and Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852
(EU Taxonomy Regulation).
Based on the work we have performed, in our view,
Management’s Review is in accordance with the Consolidated
financial statements and the Parent Company financial
statements and has been prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the Danish Financial Statements Act and
the disclosure requirements of Article 8 of Regulation (EU)
2020/852 (EU Taxonomy Regulation). We did not identify
any material misstatement in Management’s Review.
Management’s responsibilities for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of consoli-
dated financial statements that give a true and fair view in
accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted
by the EU and further requirements in the Danish Financial
Statements Act and for the preparation of parent company
financial statements that give a true and fair view in accor-
dance with the Danish Financial Statements Act, and for such
internal control as Management determines is necessary to
enable the preparation of financial statements that are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, Management is
responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing,
as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless Management either
intends to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to
cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the
financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to
issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable
assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee
that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and the
additional requirements applicable in Denmark will always
detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements
can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if,
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken
on the basis of these financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs and the additional
requirements applicable in Denmark, we exercise professional
judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout
the audit. We also:
ż Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement
of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error,
design and perform audit procedures responsive to those
risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk
of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from
fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
ż Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to
the audit in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s
and the Parent Company’s internal control.
ż Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used
and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and
related disclosures made by Management.
ż Conclude on the appropriateness of Management’s use of
the going concern basis of accounting and based on the
audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty
exists related to events or conditions that may cast
significant doubt on the Group’s and the Parent Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that
a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw
attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures
in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are
inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are
based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of
our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions
117
Statements
Vestas Annual Report 2023
Strategy and ambitions Business area progress Financial statements Additional informationGovernanceIn brief
Independent Auditor’s Reports