
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the
Managing Director for the Financial Statements
The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are
responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial
statements that give a true and fair view in accordance
with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the
EU, and of financial statements that give a true and
fair view in accordance with the laws and regulations
governing the preparation of financial statements in
Finland and comply with statutory requirements. The
Board of Directors and the Managing Director are also
responsible for such internal control as they determine
is necessary to enable the preparation of financial
statements that are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Board of
Directors and the Managing Director are responsible
for assessing the parent company’s and the group’s
ability to continue as going concern, disclosing, as
applicable, matters relating to going concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting. The financial
statements are prepared using the going concern basis
of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate
the parent company or the group or cease operations, or
there is no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for
the Audit of Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance on
whether the financial statements as a whole are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes
our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level
of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with good auditing practice
will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and
are considered material if, individually or in aggregate,
they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with good auditing
practice, we exercise professional judgment and
maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement
of the financial statements, whether due to fraud
or error, design and perform audit procedures
responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence
that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a
material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher
than for one resulting from error, as fraud may
involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant
to the audit in order to design audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the parent company’s or the group’s internal
control.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies
used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates
and related disclosures made by management.
• •
Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of
Directors’ and the Managing Director’s use of the
going concern basis of accounting and based on
the audit evidence obtained, whether a material
uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that
may cast significant doubt on the parent company’s
or the group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we
are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Valuation of investment property
Refer to Note 2.1 in the consolidated financial statements.
The value of investment properties in the consolidated financial
statements 31.12.2025 is 3.265,9 million euros (3.627,8 million
euros).
Investment properties are properties in accordance with the IAS 40
standard, which are measured at fair value as referred to in IFRS 13.
Yield requirement, market rents, vacancy rate and operating
expenses form the key variables used in an investment property’s
fair value measurement.
The valuation of investment property has been considered as a
key audit matter of consolidated financial statements because
the evaluation of the fair value of investment properties involves
management’s judgement and assumptions.
This matter is a significant risk of material misstatement referred to
in EU Regulation No 537/2014, point (c) of Article 10(2).
In our audit, we have evaluated and challenged the principles and
methods applied in determining fair values and evaluated the
controls related to the valuation process.
Among other things, we have carried out the following audit activities:
• Assessing the appropriateness of valuation methods and the
reasonableness of the assumptions used by management.
• Testing the mathematical accuracy of the valuation method used
by the company.
• Comparison of the valuation of investment properties by region
with external market information sources.
• Assessment of the accuracy of the valuation calculation
parameters.
• Ensuring the competence and objectivity of an external evaluator
used by management.
We have assessed the appropriateness of presentation in the
consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill valuation
Refer to Note 5.2 in the consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill in the consolidated balance sheet is 89,7 million euros
(89,9 million euros). The goodwill is allocated to the Norway business
unit as a whole.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. Impairment is
determined for goodwill by assessing the recoverable amount of
each CGU (or group of CGUs) to which the goodwill relates.
Citycon determines recoverable amounts using value in use cash
flows based on cash flows. The recoverable amount is sensitive
especially to assumption of discount rate and net rental income.
The valuation of goodwill has been considered as a key audit matter
of the consolidated financial statements, as the testing of goodwill
for impairment involves significant management judgement and
assumptions, especially in determining recoverable amount.
In our audit, we have evaluated impairment testing models prepared
by the management and approved by the Board of Directors and
evaluated impairment testing controls.
We have discussed with management of the bases used in
the forecasts and evaluated significant assumptions used by
management:
• We have compared growth and profitability assumptions with
historical development.
• We have compared the input data and estimates used in the
calculations with the budgets approved by the Board of Directors.
• In assessing the accuracy of discount rates, we have compared
the input data used to determine the discount rate with external
sources and mirrored the change in interest rates to the previous
year, assessing its accuracy.
• We have tested the mathematical accuracy of the impairment test
calculation.
We have also assessed the appropriateness of the notes on
impairment testing.
We have no key audit matters to report with respect to our audit of the parent company financial statements. There are no significant
risks of material misstatement referred to in EU regulation No 537/241, point (c) of Article 10(2) relating to the parent company’s financial
statements.
92
Financial statementsFinancial review Financial Review 2025