
64
SignaturesParent company financial statements Auditor’s reportCEO’s reviewKey figures Board of Directors’ report Group financial statements
ity of its operations. The Board has set Garantia’s target level
for capitalisation above the statutory solvency capital require-
ment, the minimum capital requirement required by credit
rating agency Standard & Poor’s for an AAA credit rating, and
the economic capital model defined at a confidence level of
99.5%. Garantia only distributes dividends or returns capital
to the owner when this does not put the A- credit rating or the
internal solvency target levels of Garantia at risk. The purpose
of capital management is to ensure in an anticipatory way that
the company has adequate capital reserves for exceptional
situations. The principal means to maintain balance between
risks and actual capitalisation is to ensure profitable business
operations and active risk management. If an imbalance is
detected, balance is restored with management of profit and
risk position, by refraining dividend payments or by acquiring
new capital.
Risk appetite means the amount and type of risks that the
company is prepared to take in order to achieve the targets
set for its business. Garantia has moderate risk appetite and
this is defined with so-called “risk-taking limits / risk indica-
tors”. The Board of Directors approves the risk-taking limits
/ risk indicators annually as part of the capital plan (solvency
limits), credit risk policy (concentration risks and risk-taking
limits concerning insurance operations), reinsurance policy
(risk-taking limits concerning reinsurance) and the investment
plan (risk-taking limits concerning investment activities).
Constant identification and assessment of risks in the
business and operating environment are part of Garantia’s
risk and solvency management process. The principal risks
associated with Garantia’s business operations are credit risks
arising from guaranty operations, investment risks regarding
assets covering technical provisions and shareholders’ equity,
strategic risks and operational and compliance risks. The iden-
tification and assessment of risks are described separately for
each risk below.
Garantia defines and assesses its capital requirement /
measures the risk of its business operations with three differ-
ent Value-at-Risk-based risk indicators. The primary indicator
used in the steering of operations, measurement of risk and
assessment of capital adequacy is economic capital (“Internal
risk capital”) at a confidence level of 99.5%. When estimating
its capital requirement, the company also uses the solvency
capital requirement (SCR) based on the Solvency II standard
formula at a confidence level of 99.5% including the capital
add-on and the minimum capital requirement corresponding
to AAA credit rating that is in accordance with the S&P’s Insur-
ance Capital Model. In addition to VaR-based risk indicators,
Garantia measures, monitors and assesses the risks of its
business operations and their development with other quanti-
tative and qualitative risk indicators. The measurement of risks
is described separately for each risk below.
Garantia’s monitoring and reporting of risk and solvency
position is divided into internal and external monitoring and
reporting. External reporting means the information pub-
lished for all stakeholders and reporting to the authorities.
Garantia also reports on its operations to external credit rating
agency Standard & Poor’s. Internally risk and solvency position
is reported to Garantia’s Management Team and Board of
Directors at least once a month and quarterly to the Taaleri
Group Risk and Capital Committee and further to the Board
of Directors of the Taaleri Group. The target of internal moni-
toring and reporting is to ensure that the company’s risk and
solvency position are within the limits of risk appetite.
Insurance risk
Insurance risk means a risk of loss arising from inadequate
assumptions concerning pricing and technical provisions or
an unfavourable change in the value of insurance liabilities.
In guaranties, the insurance risk mostly consists of credit risk,
i.e. the inability of the guaranteed counterparty to manage its
financial and/or operational obligations under the contract
in relation to the insured party. This may be the result of the
default of the guaranteed counterparty (default risk) or the
guaranteed counterparty may fail to fulfil a contractual obliga-
tion on time (delivery risk). The credit risk is also considered
to include the counterparty risk of the reinsurers or the party
providing other counter guaranties, which results from the
default of the reinsurer or the party providing other counter
guaranties, and the value change risk, which is caused by
changes in the fair value of the collateral.
The aim in the management of insurance risk related to
guarantee insurance i.e credit risk is to ensure that the negative
profit impacts arising from client and counterparty risks remain
at acceptable levels and that the returns are adequate in re-
lation to the risks taken. In guaranty insurance credit risks are
reduced by means of client selection, active management of
client relationships, monitoring of changes in the clients’ opera-
tions, pricing, diversification and also typically with reinsurance
and with collateral and covenant arrangements. Central to
the management of credit risks is the process of underwriting
insurance policies, which is controlled by the credit risk policy,
reinsurance policy and decision-making system approved
by the Board of Directors and the complementary process
descriptions and guidelines on credit risk assessment, audit-
ing of distribution partners, pricing, collateral and covenants
approved by the Management Team. The risk management
function monitors the functioning and quality of the insurance
process. In addition to the daily insurance process, credit risks
are identified and assessed at least once a year with a risk sur-
vey compiled in conjunction with the annual planning.
The amount of insurance risk is measured by the eco-
nomic capital model, by the solvency capital requirement
(SCR) including and excluding the capital add-on and by
S&P’s insurance capital model. The insurance risk’s economic
capital is defined separately for each contract with internal
ratings-based approach according to Basel II which considers
the exposure at default (EAD), the instrument’s credit rating
(probability of default, PD), duration, and the loss given de-
fault (LGD), which depends on counter-collateral and reinsur-
ance. The economic capital model also includes concentration
risk. Garantia regularly assesses its economic capital model
and the functionality of the parameters used in the calculation
of the amount of economic capital, including the effectiveness
of risk mitigating techniques as part of assessment of the
accuracy of the LGD parameter. Credit risks specific to clients
and groups of connected clients are assessed with the follow-
ing indicators in addition to economic capital model: client’s
rating and background variables, gross insurance exposure,
the proportion reinsured and amount and type of other collat-
eral, uncovered exposure, covenants and risk client status. The
credit risk exposure of the insurance portfolio is assessed with
the following indicators: gross exposure, proportion reinsured
and other collateral, and uncovered exposure and economic
capital figures by product group, rating class, industry, aver-
age maturity of exposure, claims incurred in relation to earned
premiums and insurance exposure. The insurance risk position
is monitored and reported to the Management Team and the
Board of Directors every month.
Quantitative information on insurance risks and technical
provisions are presented in note 42.
Actuarial assumptions
Under the Insurance Companies Act, insurance companies
must adopt prudent calculation criteria for determining the
technical provisions. The value of the technical provisions
must always be adequate so that the company can be rea-
sonably assumed to be able to manage its commitments. The
criteria for calculating the technical provisions must be sub-
mitted to the Financial Supervisory Authority before the end
of the financial year.
The provision for unearned premiums is determined as
‘pro rata parte temporis’. The proportion of the premiums
written of the valid insurance policies assigned to future finan-
cial years is determined on a guarantee basis. The outstand-
ing claims provision consists of known and unknown claims.
The individual claims due after the closing date are allocated
on a claims basis as part of the known outstanding claims. A
proportion of the premiums written accrued by the compa-
ny during a financial year is allocated to outstanding claims
unknown to the company on the closing date as part of un-
known outstanding claims, using a specific coefficient. Actual
technical provisions are not discounted.
The purpose of the equalization provision is to balance
the impact of years with exceptional technical results. The
equalization provision acts as a buffer, especially against
growth in claims incurred. In Garantia’s calculation bases for