
45
7. We have nothing to report on the other information in the
Annual Report
The directors are responsible for the other information
presented in the Annual Report together with the financial
statements. Our opinion on the financial statements does not
cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express
an audit opinion or, except as explicitly stated below, any form of
assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing
so, consider whether, based on our financial statements audit
work, the information therein is materially misstated or
inconsistent with the financial statements or our audit
knowledge. Based solely on that work we have not identified
material misstatements in the other information.
Strategic report and directors’ report
Based solely on our work on the other information:
— we have not identified material misstatements in the
strategic report and the directors’ report;
— in our opinion the information given in those reports for the
financial year is consistent with the financial statements; and
— in our opinion those reports have been prepared in
accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Directors’ remuneration report
In our opinion the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to
be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006.
Disclosures of emerging and principal risks and longer-term
viability
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether
there is a material inconsistency between the directors’
disclosures in respect of emerging and principal risks and the
viability statement, and the financial statements and our audit
knowledge.
Based on those procedures, other than the material uncertainty
related to going concern referred to above, we have nothing
further material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
— the directors’ confirmation within the viability statement on
page 9 that they have carried out a robust assessment of the
emerging and principal risks facing the Group, including those
that would threaten its business model, future performance,
solvency and liquidity;
— the longer term viability statement disclosures describing
these risks and how emerging risks are identified, and
explaining how they are being managed and mitigated; and
— the directors’ explanation in the viability statement of how
they have assessed the prospects of the Group, over what
period they have done so and why they considered that
period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether
they have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be
able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they
fall due over the period of their assessment, including any
related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary
qualifications or assumptions.
We are also required to review the viability statement, set out on
page 9, provided as if the Company were required to comply with
the Listing Rules in relation to this matter. Based on the above
procedures, we have concluded that the above disclosures are
materially consistent with the financial statements and our audit
knowledge.
Our work is limited to assessing these matters in the context of
only the knowledge acquired during our financial statements
audit. As we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as
subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent
with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were
made, the absence of anything to report on these statements is
not a guarantee as to the Group’s and Company’s longer-term
viability.
Corporate governance disclosures
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether
there is a material inconsistency between the directors’
corporate governance disclosures and the financial statements
and our audit knowledge.
Based on those procedures, we have concluded that each of the
following is materially consistent with the financial statements
and our audit knowledge:
— the directors’ statement that they consider that the annual
report and financial statements taken as a whole is fair,
balanced and understandable, and provides the information
necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s position and
performance, business model and strategy;
— the section of the annual report describing the work of the
Audit Committee, including the significant issues that the
audit committee considered in relation to the financial
statements, and how these issues were addressed; and
— the section of the annual report that describes the review of
the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and
internal control systems.
In addition to our audit of the financial statements, the directors
have engaged us to review their Corporate Governance
Statement as if the Company were required to comply with the
Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority in relation to this
matter. Under the terms of our engagement we are required to
review the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating
to the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK
Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. We have
nothing to report in this respect.
Based solely on our work on the other information described
above:
— with respect to the Corporate Governance Report
disclosures about internal control and risk management
systems in relation to financial reporting processes and
about share capital structures:
− we have not identified material misstatements therein;
and
− the information therein is consistent with the financial
statements; and
— in our opinion, the Corporate Governance Statement has
been prepared in accordance with relevant rules of the
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial
Conduct Authority.
We are also required to report to you if a corporate governance
statement has not been prepared by the Company. We have
nothing to report in these respects.
Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement
related to compliance with laws and regulations
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could reasonably be
expected to have a material effect on the financial statements from
our general commercial and sector experience, through discussion
with the directors and other management (as required by auditing
standards), and discussed with the directors and other management
the policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and
regulations.
As the Group is regulated, our assessment of risks involved gaining
an understanding of the control environment including the entity’s
procedures for complying with regulatory requirements.
We communicated identified laws and regulations throughout our
team and remained alert to any indications of non-compliance
throughout the audit.
The potential effects of these laws and regulations on the financial
statements varies considerably.
Firstly, the Group is subject to laws and regulations that directly
affect the financial statements including financial reporting
legislation (including related companies legislation), distributable
profits legislation, and taxation legislation and we assessed the
extent of compliance with these laws and regulations as part of our
procedures on the related financial statement items.
Secondly, the Group is subject to many other laws and regulations
where the consequences of non-compliance could have a material
effect on amounts of disclosures in the financial statements, for
instance through the imposition of fines or litigation. We identified
the following areas as the most likely to have such an effect: anti-
bribery, employment law and certain aspects of company legislation
recognising the nature of the Group’s activities and its legal form.
Auditing standards limit the required audit procedures to identify
non-compliance with these laws and regulations to enquiry of the
directors and other management and inspection of regulatory and
legal correspondence, if any. Therefore if a breach of operational
regulations is not disclosed to us or evident from relevant
correspondence, an audit will not detect that breach.
We discussed with the audit committee matters related to actual or
suspected breaches of laws or regulations, for which disclosure is
not necessary, and considered any implications for our audit.
Context of the ability of the audit to detect fraud or breaches
of law or regulation
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an
unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some material
misstatements in the financial statements, even though we have
properly planned and performed our audit in accordance with
auditing standards. For example, the further removed non-
compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and
transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely
the inherently limited procedures required by auditing standards
would identify it.
In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of
non-detection of fraud, as these may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of
internal controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect
material misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing
non-compliance or fraud and cannot be expected to detect non-
compliance with all laws and regulations.