37
relevant professional qualification in Romania and who has recent experience in the location and categories of the
investment property being valued. Additionally, for those properties where pre-sale agreements were in place, the
sale value included in the respective sale agreements has been used for the purposes of the valuation.
Valuation has been made such, in accordance with the International Valuation Standards, to reflect market value
of the properties, namely “The amount for which an asset could be exchanged or a liability settled, between
knowledgeable, willing parties, in an arm’s length transaction”. No account has been taken of any additional
prospective purchaser with a special interest. No allowance has been made with regard to any expenses of
realization, or for any taxation arising in case of disposal.
With regard to the valuation methodology, two approaches were used: (i) the direct market comparison approach
and (ii) the residual approach. Both approaches were utilised, and the degree to which either, or both, are relevant
depended upon the nature of the specific land plot and the availability of information. When data is available, the
market comparison approach is the most direct and systematic approach as it recognizes that property prices are
determined by the market. Valuation by comparison is essentially objective since it is based on an analysis of the
price achieved or offered for sites with broadly similar development characteristics with the land being valued. The
residual approach estimates the land value considering the value of the proposed project upon completion and the
deduction of the development costs, including the developer’s profit. This method requires the input of a large
amount of data and involves a large number of assumptions. Even small changes in any of the inputs can
cumulatively lead to a large change in the land value. Thus, the application of this method requires a high level of
expertise, being mainly used as an alternative approach when there are no or limited comparables to apply the direct
market comparison approach. In line with the market practice, the valuation of assets is determined and quoted in
EUR. While the basis for preparation of accounting records is RON the EUR/RON exchange rate movements result
into currency differences which are reflected as an adjustment to the carrying value of the investment property.
Taking into account the characteristics of the Group’s properties, as well as the features of the local market, the
market comparison approach was considered in these circumstances as the most suitable in estimating the market
value of the properties. For each property, several comparables were selected and the following elements of
comparison were considered: price, real property rights transferred, financing terms, conditions of sale,
expenditures made immediately after the purchase, location, area, visibility and frontage, utilities, access, public
transportation, existing buildings, existing potential building permitting and best use. Land price varies depending
on the size of the plot. In case of development sites, the larger the plot, the lower the price per square meter. In
terms of size, based on market evidence, land plots were grouped in several intervals, as follows: smaller than 1,000
sq m, between 1,000 and 5,000 sq m, between 5,000 and 10,000 sq m, between 10,000 and 50,000 sq m and larger
than 50,000 sq m. If comparison was made with sites that are in different size intervals, a 5% adjustment was
applied.
The properties have been inspected along with the surrounding neighbourhood and location from which comparable
data was drawn where possible. The limited liquidity of the market has resulted in comparables being mainly based
on the most recent asking prices. In such cases, several adjustments ranging on average between 10-30% were
applied to the asking prices to adjust for reduced liquidity, difference in size, accessibility, permitting, etc.
Within the fair value hierarchy, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement the
above-described valuation of investment properties is categorised as Level 3 — Valuation techniques for which the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable. In arriving at their estimates of
market values the valuators used their market knowledge and professional judgement and did not rely solely on
historical transactional comparables. In these circumstances, there was a greater degree of uncertainty than which
exists in a more active market in estimating the market values of investment property. Furthermore, given the rapid
change on the market, significant alterations of value can be encountered within short periods of time. Unforeseen
macroeconomic or political crises can have a sudden and dramatic effect on markets. This could manifest itself by
either panic buying or selling, or simply disinclination to trade until it is clear how prices in the market will be