
ANNUAL REPORT 2025
CONTENTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ REPORT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE 83
Independent Auditor’s Report
PricewaterhouseCoopers AS, org.no.: 987 009 713 MVA, Statsautoriserte revisorer, medlemmer av Den norske Revisorforening og autorisert regnskapsførerselskap
Advokatfirma
et Pricewaterhous
eCoopers AS
, Org.no.: 98
8 371 084 MVA, M
edlemmer av Adv
okatforenin
gen.
advokatfirm[email protected] PwC Tax Services AS, Org.no.: 962 066 321 MVA, Autorisert regnskapsførerselskap, Medlem av Regnskap Norge
Dronning Eufemias gate 71, Postboks 748 Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, T: 02316 (+47 952 60 000) www.pwc.no
To the General Meeting of Akastor ASA
Independent Auditor’s Report
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of Akastor ASA, which comprise:
• the financial statements of the parent company Akastor ASA (the Company), which comprise the statement of
financial position as at 31 December 2025, the income statement and statement of cash flow for the year then
ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies, and
• the consolidated financial statements of Akastor ASA and its subsidiaries (the Group), which comprise the
statement of financial position as at 31 December 2025, the income statement, statement of comprehensive
income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flow for the year then ended, and notes to the
financial statements, including material accounting policy information.
In our opinion
• the financial statements comply with applicable statutory requirements,
• the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company as at 31 December
2025, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the Norwegian
Accounting Act and accounting standards and practices generally accepted in Norway, and
• the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Group as at 31
December 2025, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with
IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU.
Our opinion is consistent with our additional report to the Audit Committee.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those
standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our
report. We are independent of the Company and the Group as required by relevant laws and regulations in Norway and
the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
(including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code) as applicable to audits of financial statements of public
interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe
that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, no prohibited non-audit services referred to in the Audit Regulation (537/2014)
Article 5.1 have been provided.
We have been the auditor of Akastor ASA for four years from the election by the general meeting of the shareholders on
20 April 2022 for the accounting year 2022.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the
financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial
statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
The Group’s business activities are largely unchanged compared to last year. We have not identified regulatory changes,
transactions or other events that qualified as new key audit matters this year. Accuracy of Equity-accounted investments
2 / 5
and Valuation of Other investments have the same characteristics during 2025, and consequently have been areas of
focus also for this year’s audit.
How our audit addressed the Key Audit Matter
Accuracy of Equity-accounted investments
Investments in the Joint Ventures (JV)
,
HMH Holding B.V.
and AKOFS Offshore AS
, amounts to approximately 59%
of the Group’s total assets. Any year
-on-year fluctuations
in Akastor’s share of the JVs booked results may amount
to a significant part of the Group’s total results. As such,
accuracy in reporting Group management receives from
JVs is of significance to
the Group’s financial statements.
To ensure accuracy, we had extensive involvement with
the JV auditors.
See note 3 “Significant accounting policies”, section
“Basis of consolidation” for significant accounting policies
applied for investments in joint ventures. Information on
the recognition and measurement of the JVs are
disclosed in note 12 “Equity
-accounted investments”.
Equity-accounted investments
recognised by management in the statement of financial
position and the corresponding financial statement line
items in the income statement and statement of
comprehensive income, against financial reports of the
JVs. The JVs’ financial reports were commun
icated to us
by component audit teams who, as instructed by us,
performed audit work related to the JVs for purposes of
the Group audit.
To evaluate the reliability of the JVs financial reports, we
obtained an understanding of the JVs, held discussions
with
the Group’s management and supervised the
throughout the audit process. We
were involved in the component audit teams’ risk
assessment, including the susceptibility of material
misstatement due to fraud or error. We also reviewed
their audit plan with regards to identified significant risks
and challenged their audit respons
e to areas subject to
nt. We instructed the component
auditors on the materiality levels for their
component
supervision, involvement and communication,
both written and otherwise, was extensive.
The
component auditors confirmed to us that they
were
independent of the Group.
We assessed the competence, independence, and work
performed by the component audit teams to ensure that
their audit procedures were adequate for the purposes of
the Group audit. This assessment was based on previous
experience with the component auditors,
meetings held
with them during the current year’s audit, and frequent
communication.
To evaluate the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit
evidence obtained by the component audit teams, we
reviewed the
component auditors’ reporting to us, held
meetings with the component audit teams
, and reviewed
their audit documentation. Our procedures were focused
on the audit of significant risks and the audit of the
consolidation process and
-journals.
Finally, we considered the adequacy of disclosures in
notes related to
Equity-accounted investments and found
Valuation of Other investments
Other
investments amounted to approximately 15
% of the
Group’s total assets
as at 31 December 2025. Other
nvestments are primarily measured at fair value through
other comprehensive income and is classified as level 3 in
the fair value hierarchy.
Management uses valuation
techniques to estimate the fair value of Other
We obtained an understanding of management’s
processes and controls related to the valuation of
Other
the valuation model obtained
including the valuation method
applied, tested the mathematical accuracy of the model,
3 / 5
investments. The carrying value is sensitive to
management’s use of judgment
.
See note 4 “Significant accounting estimates and
judgements” for disclosures on Management’s fair value
measurement and Impairment of financial assets. The
carrying value of
Other i
nvestments is specified in note 13
“Other Investments”.
and considered whether the valuation model was
appropriate
in the circumstances.
We challenged the key assumptions applied by
management in the valuation model. Specifically, we
discussed with management to challenge their view on
ebitda, growth, net working capital and net interest
-
bearing debt, peer groups, ev/ebitda valuation multiples
and discount rate. We compared applied assumptions to
budgets approved by management and to obtainable
market information such as relevant benchmarks for
enterprise value multiples and discount rates
. We also
tested data used in the model against relev
ant
Finally, we considered the adequacy of disclosures in
notes for Other
investments and found them to be
Other Information
The Board of Directors and the Managing Director (management) are responsible for the information in the Board of
Directors’ report and the other information accompanying the financial statements. The other information comprises
information in the annual report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our
opinion on the financial statements does not cover the information in the Board of Directors’ report nor the other
information accompanying the financial statements.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the Board of Directors’ report and the
other information accompanying the financial statements. The purpose is to consider if there is material inconsistency
between the Board of Directors’ report and the other information accompanying the financial statements and the financial
statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or whether the Board of Directors’ report and the other information
accompanying the financial statements otherwise appears to be materially misstated. We are required to report if there is
a material misstatement in the Board of Directors’ report or the other information accompanying the financial statements.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Based on our knowledge obtained in the audit, it is our opinion that the Board of Directors’ report
• is consistent with the financial statements and
• contains the information required by applicable statutory requirements.
Our opinion on the Board of Directors' report applies correspondingly to the statement on Corporate Governance.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements of the Company that give a true and fair view in
accordance with the Norwegian Accounting Act and accounting standards and practices generally accepted in Norway,
and for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements of the Group that give a true and fair view in accordance
with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU. Management is responsible for such internal control as
management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s and the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern. The financial statements of the
Company use the going concern basis of accounting insofar as it is not likely that the enterprise will cease operations.
The consolidated financial statements of the Group use the going concern basis of accounting unless management either
intends to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with
ISAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are