
35
Any findings identified through the due diligence review process (or otherwise during the ordinary course of business),
are followed up separately with continuous reporting to the Audit Committee.
DUE DILIGENCE FINDINGS AND AREAS OF FOCUS
Under the Transparency Act, EMGS is obligated to publish the “[…] actual negative consequences for basic human rights
and decent working conditions, and significant risk of negative consequences […]” (office translation) identified by the
Company as part of the due diligence review.
EMGS has not, during the period covered by this statement, identified any actual negative consequences for basic
human rights and decent working conditions as a direct or indirect result of its business or operations.
Based on a risk-based approach, EMGS has identified the following two areas as those with the highest risk (meaning,
in this context, more than a remote or hypothetical possibility) of negative consequences for human rights and/or
decent working conditions:
EMGS operates on a worldwide basis. Consequently, the Company will from time-to-time operate in countries
where local requirements, laws and regulations applicable to our operations (e.g. requirements for fishing
representatives onboard our vessel during operations) do not sufficiently safeguard the interest of local fishing
communities and/or indigenous peoples. Consequently, when performing offshore acquisition operations in
such countries, the Company would, if it solely relied on meeting the requirements under applicable local law,
still risk infringing on the rights and interests of such local fishing communities and/or indigenous peoples. To
mitigate this risk, EMGS undertakes specific human-rights related risk analysis when operating in such
jurisdictions and implements mitigating initiatives and efforts if and as appropriate. Based on the concrete
circumstances, such mitigating initiatives and efforts may include voluntary use of fishing representative(s),
retaining one or more local community/fishing liaisons, consultation with affected or potentially affected local
communities and fishermen, and paying appropriate compensation in case of disruption to fishing activity
(including in the form of pre-emptive compensation; paying compensation to local fishing communities so that
they may temporarily cease their fishing activity in EMGS’ area of operation). Based on extensive experience
from operating in such areas, and considering the robust mitigating measures EMGS employs, we consider the
risk to be very low (although not negligible).
At the end of 2022, EMGS had 20 full time employees (whereof 19 were based in Norway), in addition to
certain direct contractors. EMGS considers the risk of potential non-compliance with the right to decent
working conditions among its own employees and direct contractors, including in both instances with respect
to those working on the Company’s vessel/offshore, to be very low. EMGS also relies on the consultants,
contractors, and employees of our suppliers. As we are not the employer/direct contracting party with this
personnel, regular interaction and follow up is required to ensure that their working conditions are, as a
minimum, decent and generally acceptable. EMGS mitigates this risk by specifically addressing these questions
with our contracting counterparties both during the sourcing/contracting phase and (for longer/recurring
engagements) with regular intervals during the course of the relationship. Furthermore, our own employees
are encouraged to report, either through their line manager or, if deemed appropriate, through our whistle-
blowing channel if they suspect that working conditions for such personnel is below the requirements of EMGS.
EMGS considers this risk to be very low (although not negligible).
INFORMATION REQUESTS
Under Section 6 of the Transparency Act, any person has the right to submit a written request for further information
Oslo, 19 April 2023
Board of Directors and CEO of Electromagnetic Geoservices ASA
Sign.