
41
42
MAHA ENERGY 2021 ANNUAL REPORT
gas sales, are the most material. These counterparties
represent 92 per cent of the Company’s total revenue value
from customers. Currently there are no viable options to
these counterparties in the short-term, and a loss of any of
these material counterparties is expected to be particularly
costly and time-consuming and would also lead to a certain
period of adjustment to such new circumstances. There is
further a risk that these counterparties will change their
terms or increase their prices (discounts) which would
result in weakened margins for the Company. There
is also a risk that these counterparties will encounter
diculties in providing services due to a shortage of raw
materials, strikes, damage, financial diculties or other
circumstances that aect the counterparty. If the risks
would materialize, this may adversely aect the Company’s
possibility to deliver products to end customers, and lead
to increased costs as well as delays and/ or non-delivery,
which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s
operations and, indirectly, on the Company’s net sales.
Environmental and climate-related risks
All phases of the oil and natural gas business present
environmental risks and hazards and are subject to
environmental regulation pursuant to a variety of laws
and regulations in the dierent jurisdictions where the
Company operates. Environmental legislation provides for,
among other things, restrictions and prohibitions on spills,
releases or emissions of various substances produced
in association with oil and natural gas operations. The
legislation also requires that wells and facility sites be
operated, maintained, abandoned, decommissioned and
reclaimed in a certain way to satisfy applicable regulatory
authorities. Environmental regulations are expected
to become more stringent in the future, and costs are
expected to increase. Failure to comply with any such
environmental regulations or any undertakings imposed
on the Company might entail civil, administrative and
criminal sanctions.
The Company’s operations are located in regions where
there are numerous environmental regulations including
restrictions on where and when oil and gas operations
may occur, regulations on the release of substances
into groundwater, atmosphere and surface land and
the location of production facilities. There is currently a
federal conservation area, created to protect sea turtle
nesting areas, close to the Company’s Tartaruga field
operations. Because of this reserve, there is a possibility
for a drilling ban from September to April, which may
limit the Company’s exploitation opportunities. The
geographical boundaries of such conservation unit as
well as the activities to be allowed therein are currently
being questioned through a Public Civil Action filed by
the Federal District Attorney´s Oce. The Company is
not a party to the proceedings but its result might aect
and restrict the Company´s Tartaruga field operations.
In addition, there is a risk that other areas the Company
operates in may be subject to similar regulations in the
future which would restrict the ability for the Company
to conduct its operations.
The Company faces the evolving worldwide energy
transition risks as demand for energy and global
advancement of alternative sources of energy that are not
sourced from fossil fuels could change assumptions used
to determine the recoverable amount of the Company’s
PP&E and E&E assets and could aect the carrying value
of those assets, may aect future development or viability
of exploration prospects, may curtail the expected useful
lives of oil and gas assets thereby accelerating depreciation
charges and may accelerate decommissioning obligations
increasing the present value of the associated provisions.
Changes in environmental legislation can result in
a curtailment of production, and require significant
expenditures, e.g. regarding production, development
and exploration activities. In addition, a breach of
applicable environmental regulation or legislation may
result in liabilities such as the recovery of the damages,
the imposition of fines and penalties, some of which may
be material, and/or restrictions or cessation of operations.
The legislative framework in the jurisdictions where the
Company operates regarding the environment features
items such as strict liability and joint, and several liability
with regard to joint venture operations.
The energy transition could impact the future prices
of commodities. Pricing assumptions used in the
determination of recoverable amounts incorporate
markets expectations and the evolving worldwide demand
for energy. Changes to assumptions could result in a
material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets
and liabilities within the next financial year.
Decommissioning
The Company has assumed certain obligations in respect of
the decommissioning of its fields and related infrastructure
in all operating areas of the Company. In some cases,
these liabilities are derived from legislative and regulatory
requirements, and in other cases, these liabilities can also
be contractual obligations. In Brazil, such requirements
are still under discussion and waiting for approval by
the ANP, concerning the decommissioning of wells and
production facilities and require the Company to make
provision for and/or underwrite the liabilities relating to
such decommissioning. The Company’s accounts make a
provision for such decommissioning costs based on the
management’s estimate in accordance with applicable
accounting standards but there is a risk that the actual costs
of decommissioning exceed the amount of the long-term
provision set aside to cover such decommissioning costs.
The Company’s decommissioning provision amounted to
TUSD 2,597 as per 31 December 2021, which includes all
wells and facilities in Brazil and the USA. In addition, the
Company may be required to decommission wells that have
not reached the end of their service life as a result of e.g.
regulatory requirements. These risks may, if materialized,
have a material adverse eect on the Company’s business
and result. In addition, local or national governments and
lessors of oil and gas leases may require the Company to
provide cash-back guarantees, blocked cash deposits or
similar upfront payments and escrow relating to future
decommissioning costs which would aect the Company’s
liquidity.
Financial risks
Management estimates and assumptions
In preparing consolidated financial statements in
conformity with IFRS, estimates and assumptions are
used by management in determining the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses
recognized during the periods presented and disclosures
of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of
the date of the financial statements. These estimates and
assumptions must be made because certain information
that is used in the preparation of such financial statements
is dependent on future events, cannot be calculated with
a high degree of precision from data available, or is not
capable of being readily calculated based on generally
accepted methodologies. In some cases, these estimates
are particularly dicult to determine and the Company
must exercise significant judgment. Actual results for all
estimates could dier materially from the estimates and
assumptions used by the Company, which could have a
material adverse eect on the Group’s business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows and future
prospects.
Credit risk
The Company may be exposed to third party credit risk
through its contractual arrangements with its current or
future joint venture partners, customers, and other parties.
Currently, the Company has a Joint Operating Agreement
regarding the Tartaruga field with Petrobras. Furthermore,
oil sales in Brazil are made to Petrobras and a private
refinery, Dax. Historically, Petrobras and Dax have fulfilled
their payment obligations. Crude oil sales made to Dax are
prepaid, but occasional credit is extended to the customer
during long weekends or public holidays. The Company
receives payment between 20 and 30 days in arrears from
Petrobras. In the USA, the Company markets and sells its
oil through Country Mark (Illinois Basin) and Mercuria
Energy Trading (LAK Ranch) and receives payment 30
days in arrears. In the USA, historically, the Company has
always received full payment. The Company’s financial
position may be materially adversely aected in the event
such partners fail to meet their contractual obligations to
the Company.
A portion of the Company’s cash is held by banks in foreign
jurisdictions where there could be increased exposure to
credit risk. In the event the Company’s counterparty does
not fulfill its obligations in accordance with agreements,
this could adversely affect the Company’s business,
financial position and results.
Liquidity and Refinancing Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be
able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.
The Company has since inception been equity and debt
financed through share and bonds issues, and also financed
by asset divestment. Additional capital could be needed
to finance the Company’s future operations and/or for
acquisition of additional licences. The main risk is that this
need could occur during less favourable market conditions.
Management relies on cash forecasting to assess the
Company’s cash position based on expected future cash
flows. The Company has outstanding bank debt amounting
to approximately USD 55.5 million of which USD 11.3 million
is current. The terms of the debt contain provisions which
limit the Company’s ability to make certain payments and
distributions (such as paying dividends), incur additional
indebtedness, make certain disposals of, or provide security
over its assets, or engage in mergers or demergers. Further,
the Company is required to meet certain maintenance
covenants. If the Company would fail to comply with any
of the maintenance covenants, all of the outstanding debt
may be declared immediately due and payable together
with any other amounts payable. The Company has current
assets of approximately USD 33.0 million. There is a risk
that the Company either has insucient funds to settle
the current portion of the debt or repay or refinance the
debt when due.
Refinancing risk is the risk that financing cannot be
obtained or renewed on expiry of its term or can only be
obtained or renewed at significantly increased costs. There
is a risk that additional capital cannot be obtained or can
only be obtained at unfavorable terms and conditions.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
The Company is exposed to changes in foreign exchange
rates as expenses in foreign subsidiaries, oil and gas
expenditures, or financial instruments may fluctuate due
to changes in rates. The main functional currencies of
the Company’s subsidiaries are Brazilian Reals (”BRL”) for
the subsidiaries in Brazil and Luxembourg and Swedish
Krona (”SEK”) for the subsidiaries in Sweden, making the
Company sensitive to fluctuations of these currencies
against US Dollar (”USD”). Majority of the Company’s oil
sales are denominated in BRL based on a USD oil price
and all operational, administrative and capital activities
related to the Brazil properties are transacted primarily in
BRL. In Sweden, the Company’s expenditures are in SEK.
Further, with regards to BRL, there is a risk of inflation or
hyper-inflation.
Foreign exchange controls in Brazil
In the event the operations in Brazil require financing,
exchange controls could be in place that restrict such
financing. The Brazilian government requires that the
Company registers inflows and outflows of funds with
the Brazilian Central Bank. In Brazil, all transactions
must be settled in the country’s local currency. Future
exchange controls in Brazil could prevent the Company
from transferring funds abroad, which could impede the
Company’s ability to conduct its operations in Brazil, and
lead to decrease or the loss of earnings from this market.
In addition, exchange controls or changes in tax regime
could aect the dividends the Company receives from
its subsidiary in Brazil. The above could have an adverse
eect on the profitability of the Company’s operations
in Brazil. For further details on Brazil tax reform and its
impact, see section on income taxes.