Earnings Call Transcript - ADNT Q4 2023

Operator, Operator

Welcome to the Adient Fourth Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. The lines have been placed in a listen-only mode until the question-and-answer session. Today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. I’ll now turn the call over to Mark Oswald. Sir, you may begin.

Mark Oswald, Executive Vice President

Thank you, Shirley. Good morning and thank you for joining us as we review Adient's results for the fourth quarter and full year fiscal 2023. The press release and presentation slides for our call today have been posted to the Investors section of our website at adient.com. This morning, I'm joined by Doug Del Grosso, Adient's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Jerome Dorlack, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. On today's call, Doug will provide an update on the business followed by Jerome, who will review our Q4 and full year financial results. In addition, Jerome will provide you with the company's initial outlook for fiscal 2024. After our prepared remarks, we will open the call to your questions. Before I turn the call over to Doug and Jerome, there are a few items I’d like to cover. First, today’s conference call will include forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the environment as we see it today, and therefore involve risks and uncertainties. I would caution you that our actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements made on the call. Please refer to Slide 2 of the presentation for our complete Safe Harbor statement. In addition to the financial results presented on a GAAP basis, we will be discussing non-GAAP information that we believe is useful in evaluating the company’s operating performance. Reconciliations for these non-GAAP measures to the closest GAAP equivalent can be found in the appendix of our full earnings release. This concludes my comments. I’ll now turn the call over to Doug.

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

Great. Thanks, Mark. Good morning. Thanks to our investors, prospective investors, and analysts joining the call this morning as we review our fourth quarter and full year results for fiscal 2023. Turning to Slide four, let me begin with a few comments related to the quarter and a few about Adient's full year successes, starting with the numbers. You can see Adient's financial performance as highlighted by certain key financial metrics in the box on the right-hand side of the slide. Adient finished the year strong, delivering improved year-over-year earnings growth in Q4 fiscal '23, underpinned by the relentless focus on execution, operational excellence and better-than-expected production volumes versus internal expectations at the beginning of the quarter, despite labor-related work stoppages at certain customers. Adient's fourth quarter results continued to build on positive momentum established earlier this year. For the most recent quarter, revenue, which totaled $3.7 billion, was up $79 million compared to last year's fourth quarter. Adjusted EBITDA totaled $235 million, up $8 million year-over-year and finally, Adient ended the quarter with a strong cash balance and total liquidity of $1.1 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively. Given the uncertainty surrounding the timing and magnitude of the loss production due to the strike-related work stoppages, Adient executed actions to preserve cash and liquidity as we progressed through the quarter. For the full year, Adient delivered on its commitment to increase earnings, margin, and free cash flow versus fiscal '22. Jerome will expand on the full year 2023 fiscal year results in just a moment. Adient's successes in 2023 extended beyond our strong financial performance. A few examples include the team's execution of day-to-day processes that enable world-class launch execution, continuous operational improvements, and thoughtful cost reductions. Winning new business across various regions, customers, and platforms are expected over time to strengthen our leading market position, not to mention support improved margins and earnings. The team is also executing actions that provide value add to our Adient stakeholders every day, whether that's our customers, suppliers, or employees. A variety of customers and automotive industry awards reinforce Adient's commitment to excellence. The company and its employees were recognized with approximately 60 awards in fiscal '23. Highlights include GM Supplier of the Year Award, J.D. Power Award for receipt satisfaction, and many more, as you can see. I mention these awards as proof points that the team is operating at very high levels across the company. The accomplishments in fiscal '23, both financial and operational, are even more impressive considering the challenging external headwinds that impacted the industry and Adient, including labor inflation and availability, the strengthening dollar, and a still fragile supply chain. The company's unwavering focus on our strategy enabled us to successfully navigate these challenges and position Adient for future success. Speaking of challenges, and turning to Slide five, I wanted to provide a quick update on how the UAW strike here in North America has impacted Adient. To begin with, we look at production disruptions through two lenses: the near-term impact and the potential longer-term negative effects the strike could have on the industry. Near-term, the strike has impacted Adient's just-in-time operations, as well as our component plants. With the strike beginning late in our fiscal year, the negative impact was limited in fiscal '23, call it around $30 million in sales and under $5 million in EBITDA. As the strike extended and began to impact other Adient facilities, including JIT and other component plants, the impact increased. We're encouraged that progress has been made over the past week to 10 days to settle the strike. That said, given the timing of Adient's new fiscal year, the work stoppages through October and early November have undoubtedly had a bigger impact on fiscal '24 compared to the limited impact on Adient's fiscal '23 results. Through early November, we estimate the impact on our 2024 sales and EBITDA has been approximately $125 million and $25 million, respectively. Jerome will have additional commentary related to the impact of the strikes on fiscal '24 with his prepared remarks. As you would expect, the company moved quickly to lessen the negative impact. We've listed a few of the actions on the right-hand side of the slide. I won't read through the list, other than to point out the company went into cash conservation mode and reduced or eliminated non-discretionary spending early in Q4. Given the duration of the strike, we are concerned about lingering downstream impacts to the industry, especially related to supply chain and its ability to run production at the rate when called upon. The financial health of lower-tier suppliers and labor availability are just a few. In addition, risks or repercussions related to the increased labor costs at D3, such as the typical playbook to extract value from the supply base, the ability to maintain existing and future product plans, and the ability to compete against lower-cost manufacturers, especially Chinese manufacturers that not only have a lower-cost base but new products that are extremely well-contended and desired by consumers. No doubt concerning on many levels, but that said, Adient, similar to prior external headwinds, has and will continue to execute actions to lessen the impact of these negative pressures. Turning to Slide six, you've heard us mention on several occasions that Adient's focus strategy is a key enabler to our success at driving the business forward and navigating through external challenges. The key tenets of the strategy are laid out on the left-hand side of the slide. As a reminder, the top four tenets have helped drive strong business and financial performance in both fiscal 2022 and '23. At the bottom of the slide, you'll see a fifth tenet, embracing and leveraging a shift in industry dynamics. When looking ahead, we feel it's imperative that Adient adapts to the evolving auto industry, an industry that is being influenced by a number of factors, including the pricing and affordability of EVs versus traditional vehicle platforms, which is clearly impacting the pace of EV adoption here in North America. In fact, as you're aware, certain traditional manufacturers have recently announced various retiming of EV launches to align with demand. Adient's processes, which focus on acid reuse and flexibility, enable the company to meet the EV or ICE production requirements. In other regions, namely China, the industry is being reshaped by the growth and influence of the Chinese domestic auto manufacturers. In addition, access to technology and innovation is taking place through global partnerships versus in-house capabilities; the one constant being the importance of being cost competitive. Recognizing these shifts resulted in us fine-tuning the company strategy going forward to ensure that we have the right vision to create additional value for Adient stakeholders. Speaking of value creation and turning to Slide seven, one exciting trend that has begun to emerge, especially in China, is added content within seating. Presently, China is bringing a vehicle concept to the market that is very different from traditional auto manufacturers with a focus on electronics, functionality, advanced driver-assistance systems, and the interior configurations around creature comfort. Adient's zero-gravity seat, built to balance the ultimate in comfort by keeping safety in mind, is an example of the kind of innovation that these new players are generating. Longer term, as advanced driver assistance systems and comfort features become more prevalent and as seating solutions intersect with passive safety systems, seating content is expected to outpace vehicle production as OEMs adopt this innovative new interior configuration and features. Although green shoots of this added content are primarily in China today, we're optimistic that the trend will cascade into other regions. It's important to note that Adient's ability to provide innovative solutions for our customers in China with speed and world-class execution are critical to our past and future business wins with this customer group. Turning to Slides eight and nine, now let's take a look at our launch performance and new business wins. As you can see, Slide eight highlights a few of Adient's in-process and upcoming launches. Adient continues to execute at a high level on launch performance. The programs highlighted represent a good mix of wins across EV powertrains and ICE powertrains and are diversified across a number of segments, including SUVs, luxury, mass market and contain a high level of vertical integration across complete seat, foam, trim, and metals. I'd also like to point out that these launches include a number of Adient innovative technologies that are being well-received by our customers, including our zero-gravity seat, which increases ergonomic comfort and body pressure distribution, and Changan's E12 in China. As you can see at the bottom of the slide, we've provided some commentary on what you can expect for fiscal 2024 with respect to volume and complexity of launches. Generally speaking, volume and complexity are up in the Americas, Europe, and Asia outside of China versus last year. Despite that, I'm confident we'll maintain our focus and process discipline across launch readiness, driving similar results or better than in 2023. Flipping to Slide nine, the strong operational execution and launch performance, as well as innovation I just talked about, are foundational for new business wins. A few program awards are highlighted on the slide, and it's noteworthy that these programs include a high level of vertical integration of both foam, trim, and metal components, as well as the just-in-time business. We continue to secure our replacement business. We're winning our fair share of new business, leveraging our existing footprint, and we're having success winning business while navigating the difficult macro conditions and related commercial discussions. Before handing the call over to Jerome with Slide 10, let me conclude with a few comments related to our initial thoughts on 2024. To begin, Adient's focused strategy continues to drive the business forward. Our fiscal 2023 financial and operational results, in addition to our year-to-date results, provide positive proof points. The team delivered many accomplishments last year that were hard-fought, especially considering the external operating environment. Although we're confident that positive momentum will continue into 2024, we're also aware that the New Year will likely bring a unique set of challenges and obstacles to navigate. The few that most of you have commented on include temporary production disruptions that are nearing resolution, concerns related to supply chain and the ability to run at the rate, restart of production in the Americas, the impact of foreign exchange movements, stubbornly high interest rates that are likely to be in place through the midterm, and uncertainties around consumer demand. Similar to prior years, Adient has and will continue to develop and execute contingency plans to help mitigate and lessen any potential impact. I'm confident that, combining a resolve with an unwavering commitment to the company's focused strategy, we will continue to drive the business forward in 2024, further positioning Adient for sustained success, ultimately driving increased value to all of our stakeholders. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jerome to take us through Adient's fourth quarter and full year 2023 financial performance and outlook for 2024.

Jerome Dorlack, Executive Vice President and CFO

Thanks, Doug. Let's jump into the financials on Slide 12. Adhering to our typical format, the page is formatted with our reported results on the left and our adjusted results on the right side. I'll focus my commentary on the adjusted results, which exclude special items that we view as either one-time in nature or otherwise skew important trends in underlying performance. For the quarter, the biggest driver of the difference between our reported and adjusted results relates to a non-cash valuation allowance release, pension mark-to-market, restructuring and impairment costs, and purchasing accounting amortization. Details of all adjustments for the quarter and the full year are in the appendix of the presentation. High level for the quarter, sales were approximately $3.7 billion, up 2% compared to our fourth quarter results last year. Improving vehicle production in the Americas combined with positive impact of currency movements were the primary driver of the year-over-year increase. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $235 million, up $8 million year-on-year. The increase is primarily attributed to the benefits associated with improved business performance and higher volume and mix. These benefits were partially offset by the adverse impact of net commodities driven by recovery timing, primarily in the Americas. I'll expand on these key drivers in a minute. Finally, at the bottom line, Adient reported an adjusted net income of $48 million, or $0.51 a share. Slide 13 provides a similar high-level summary of Adient's full-year financial metrics. For the year, sales were $15.4 billion, up 9% compared to fiscal 2022. Improved volume and mix across all three regions was the primary driver of the year-over-year increase. Adjusted EBITDA was $938 million, up $263 million year-on-year. The increase is primarily attributed to benefits associated with improved business performance and higher volumes, partially offset by increased net commodities. Just a reminder, the $938 million includes $30 million of insurance recoveries that are considered one-time in nature and therefore should be backed out of the run rate going forward. At the bottom line for fiscal 2023, Adient reported net income of $205 million, or $2.15 per share. Moving on, let's break down our fourth quarter results in more detail. I'll cover the next few slides rather quickly as the detail of the results are included on the slides, and this should ensure we have an adequate amount of time set aside for the Q&A portion of the call. Starting with revenue on Slide 14, we reported consolidated sales of approximately $3.7 billion, an increase of $79 million compared with Q4 FY'22. The primary drivers of the year-over-year increase included the positive impact of currency movements between the two periods of $49 million and the positive contribution from improved volumes and pricing of $30 million. Focusing on the table on the right-hand side of the slide, Adient's consolidated sales across the regions were impacted by adverse customer mix in the quarter, which we view as temporary, as well as the negative impact of non-reoccurrence of material economic recoveries in FY'22. For the full year, Adient's overall sales outpaced production by about 300 basis points when adjusting for foreign exchange. Asia demonstrated strong growth over the market, outpacing production gains by two times. No surprise, this was led by China, where consolidated sales were up 8% versus production in the region, which was up approximately 2%. America's ended the year generally in line with production, and EMEA was modestly lower, driven by our planned exit of certain low-profit platforms. As Doug mentioned earlier, given the favorable trends that we're seeing in China related to added seating content, we'd expect growth over market to continue as we look to the future. With regard to Adient's unconsolidated seating revenue, year-over-year results were up about 3% adjusted for foreign exchange. Increased production volume at our unconsolidated joint ventures, primarily in China, supported this increase. Moving to Slide 15, we've provided a bridge of adjusted EBITDA to show the performance of our segments between periods. The bucket labeled corporate represents central costs that are not allocated back to operations, such as executive office, communications, corporate finance, and legal. Big picture adjusted EBITDA was $235 million in the current quarter versus $227 million reported a year ago. Primary drivers of the year-on-year comparison are detailed on the page. Positive influences include $9 million associated with improved business performance. The business performance bucket includes items such as improved material margin and lower year-over-year input costs, freight, for example. In addition, volume and mix and increased equity income benefited the quarter by $7 million and $5 million, respectively. Partially offsetting these positive influences was a net commodity headwind of $12 million within the Americas, primarily driven by the timing of contractual true-ups. Similar to past quarters, we've provided the detail of our segment performance in the slides in the appendix of the presentation. Let me now shift to our cash, liquidity, and capital structure on Slides 16 and 17. Starting with cash on Slide 16, I'll focus on the four-year results as the longer timeframe helps smooth some of the volatility in working capital movements. Free cash flow, defined as operating cash flow less CapEx, was $415 million. This compares to $47 million in fiscal 2022. Key drivers impacting the comparison include the higher level of consolidated earnings driven by improved volumes and better overall operating environment. Lower interest paid driven by the reduced level of debt and the deferral of interest related to the March 2023 debt refinancing and typical month-to-month working capital movements. I'd also point out, as seen in the middle of the chart, timing and temporary compensation-related benefits provided a significant positive benefit to the year-over-year comparison. Given the nature of the drivers within this line item, such as the day of the week the quarter closes, year-over-year bonus accruals, and the impact of compensation-related changes between the two periods, the net impact tends to smooth over the long term, very similar to working capital. In fact, the benefits experienced in 2023 are largely expected to reverse in 2024. More on Adient's fiscal 2024 expectations in just a few moments. These benefits were partially offset by the timing of tooling recoveries, VAT deferral payments, and increased engineering in support of customer launch activities. One last point, Adient continues to utilize various factoring programs as a low-cost source of liquidity. At September 30, 2023, we had $170 million of factored receivables versus $269 million at the end of fiscal 2022. Flipping to Slide 17, as noted on the right-hand side of the slide, we ended the year with about $2 billion in total liquidity, comprised of cash on hand of $1.1 billion and roughly $900 million of undrawn capacity under Adient's revolving line of credit. The elevated level of cash reflects the company's cash conservation efforts executed during the quarter to ensure Adient's balance sheet remains strong and flexible, given the uncertainty related to the timing and duration of the work stoppages at certain of our customers as a result of the UAW negotiations. Recent news related to the tentative agreements at our customers should enable the company to resume its balanced capital allocation plan. As a reminder for the year, shares repurchased and cash deployed totaled approximately $1.8 million and $65 million respectively and as a reminder, during the March 2023 debt tender, $100 million of cash on hand was used towards voluntary debt repayment. Looking forward, cash available for future returns and share repurchases will be based not only on fiscal 2024 free cash flow but also inclusive of the cash from the balance sheet, considering we ended FY'23 with an elevated level of cash. Adient's debt and net debt position at year-end totaled about $2.5 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively. One important point to call out, the strong financial performance achieved during 2023, combined with our focus on deleveraging, has driven our net leverage ratio on a trailing 12-month basis to 1.5 times, within our target range of 1.5 to 2 times. This is a very good result. With that, let's flip to Slide 19, Slide 20 and Slide 21 and review our outlook for fiscal 2024. Starting on Slide 19, as Doug noted earlier, Adient enters 2024 from a position of strength. We successfully navigated through a challenging 2023 and drove the business forward, as evidenced by the operational and financial accomplishments just discussed. That said, 2024 began with a new set of obstacles that the team is presently navigating. The guidance provided today is based on the current operating environment. On the right-hand side of the slide, we've laid out our planning assumptions for production and foreign exchange compared with FY'23. The foundation of our FY'24 plan is generally aligned with October's S&P estimates. To the far right of the chart, we've highlighted our expected sales performance by region. When adjusting for foreign exchange, we expect our sales to be slightly favorable to the industry in North America. In line with the market in Europe and significantly better versus the market in China. China's outperformance is primarily attributed to the roll-on of various new business and Adient's favorable customer mix. In the lower right-hand corner, we've provided our foreign exchange assumptions, which, as many of you have commented on in your recent reports, is expected to be a significant headwind year on year. In fact, based on our current assumptions, we estimate the year-on-year impact from 2023 to 2024 for Adient's top line in EBITDA to be about $180 million and $60 million. Outside of production and foreign exchange, other factors that are on our radar include labor availability and cost, elevated interest rates, which are forecasted to remain higher for longer, consumer demand, and geopolitical concerns. With that said, taking these factors into consideration and based on current market conditions, we expect to deliver earnings and margin growth in 2024 versus 2023. Let's flip to Slide 20 and review key influences on Adient's FY'24 revenue and EBITDA, excluding the impact of the UAW strike, which has already had an impact on the company's 2024 performance. First, on revenue, high-level, volume and mix are expected to drive a year-over-year increase in sales, call it about 2%, which is generally in line with S&P's October forecast. From an FX standpoint, based on assumptions outlined on Slide 19, it is expected to partially offset the benefit of higher volumes, call it an approximate $180 million headwind. The Chinese RMB is expected to be a substantial driver of the headwind and the euro to a lesser degree. In total, Adient's 2024 plan for revenue, excluding the impact of the UAW work stoppages at our customers, was expected to land between $15.6 and $15.7 billion. Based on the environment today, we estimate the strike-related disruptions and production stoppages at our customers through November 3, negatively impacted Adient's top line by approximately $125 million. Although it's realistic to assume certain lost production will be made up, it's premature to quantify at this time. As you would expect, the company will provide updates as the fiscal year '24 progresses with regard to the strike-related volume recovery. The bridge for EBITDA has a few more components. First, the positive influences include the benefits of improved business performance, volume, and to a lesser extent, a $10 million benefit from net material economics. On the topic of net material economics, some of you might question the magnitude of the material economics benefit. Let me remind you of several factors that can influence that. First is the timing of recoveries. Second is the fact that commercial negotiations are often settled as a basket of goods and cannot always be directly linked to specific items. And third, the company has yet to finalize its 2024 steel contracts in Europe. The important takeaway is that Adient continues to be successful with its commercial negotiations to mitigate inflationary pressures. Moving on to the headwinds; foreign exchange is expected to pressure earnings by approximately $60 million or 30 basis points FY'24 versus FY'23. The $60 million headwind includes a translational impact of about $20 million. Although the Mexican peso is driving the majority of the transactional headwind, various currencies within Europe, such as the Polish zloty, are also contributing to the pressure. Equity income is about $20 million lower than FY'24 versus last year. The primary driver is an additional pricing agreement revision between Kuiper's JV partners, which reduces equity income but improves Adient's consolidated EBITDA primarily in the Americas. And finally, minor footprint actions in Europe and further fine-tuning of the company's operations will impact the year-over-year comparison. In total, Adient's 2024 plan for EBITDA, excluding the impact of UAW work stoppages at our customers, was expected to land north of $1 billion. Based on the environment today, we estimate the strike-related disruptions and production stoppages at our customers through November 3 negatively impacted Adient's adjusted EBITDA by approximately $25 million. Consistent with my comments related to sales, although it's realistic to assume certain of the lost production and earnings will be made up, it's premature to quantify. We'll provide updates as fiscal year '24 progresses with regard to strike-related recoveries. Turning to Slide 21, we've provided our fiscal 2024 guidance for all of Adient's key financial metrics, including the impact of the strike-related production stoppages through November 3. Having just covered revenue and adjusted EBITDA and equity income, I'll begin with interest expense. For fiscal year '24, we forecast interest expense to be about $185 million, given our expected debt and cash balances. Cash interest is expected to be slightly higher, call it $195 million, resulting from the deferral of the March 2023 refinancing. Given expectations for improved profitability year over year, cash taxes are forecasted to be $105 million. For modeling purposes, you can assume between $115 million to $125 million of adjusted tax expense. CapEx is expected to trend back to a more normalized level, call it approximately $310 million. Again, 2023 was depressed given the delay of certain launches at our customers. And finally, free cash flow is projected to be approximately $300 million. The key drivers impacting the year-over-year comparison include the higher level of cash interest, CapEx returning to a more normalized level, and the modest increase in cash taxes. Also, as mentioned in my 2023 cash commentary earlier, the timing benefits recognized in fiscal '23 related to certain accrued compensation are expected to reverse. Adjusting for fiscal 2023's outperformance or smoothing FY'23, FY'24 should provide a clearer view of Adient's run rate cash generation. With that, let's move on to the Q&A portion of the call.

Operator, Operator

Our first question comes from Colin Langan with Wells Fargo. You may ask your question.

Colin Langan, Analyst

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe I should kick it off. Doug, any color on why leaving by the end of the year? It seems like you guys have been making pretty phenomenal progress on sort of your multiyear plan. Why not sort of stay it out until you fully close the margin gap to the targets you've been talking about?

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

Sure. Thanks for the question, Colin. As you would imagine, there are certainly personal reasons I won't discuss on the call, but from a professional perspective, I've been here five years. The focus over those five years was really to get the company back to basics, focus on operational excellence, and change the culture around that, and I think we've successfully done that. We've spent time on the call today talking about the dynamics and the shifting dynamics and where we need to go in the future from a technology perspective and shifting customer perspective. I just felt at this time it was a good exit point for me. My operational background got the culture on the execution side back, and with the transition team in place, we can really focus on how we shift from a technology and customer perspective. I just think, generally speaking, five years is a good timeline for a CEO, and in refocusing our energies on where we move in the future, we'll be well served under Jerome's leadership.

Colin Langan, Analyst

Maybe if we just switch to the guidance. I think in the past you've talked about 100 basis points of margin performance per year over the next three years. I think you outperformed last year. What is offsetting? Is that all just the FX kind of washing out some of that performance that you have executed in the pipeline? It's kind of keeping the year-over-year margin expansion a bit more muted?

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

Yeah. So I think your commentary in terms of if you look at '23, we executed around about 130 basis points of margin expansion. If you look at '24, net of FX, it's around that kind of 70 basis points. So over the two years, it's still a combined 200 basis points, and it's really the FX piece of it on the transaction side in '24 that's muting that performance piece of it, especially the Mexican peso, and the teams are aggressively working with the customers to claw that back. There are going to be very difficult discussions that we'll work through and pursue, but it is an unwelcome development on our path at the moment.

Operator, Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Rod Lache with Wolfe Research. You may ask your question.

Rod Lache, Analyst

Good morning, everybody. A couple of questions. I first want to say congrats, Doug, on your retirement. You've done a lot at this company and in your career, and I wish you the best in your next adventure.

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

Appreciate it, Rod. Thanks.

Rod Lache, Analyst

I wanted to ask you just firstly, on this FX impact specifically, it was a million dollars on your EBITDA in the fourth quarter and just looking back, in the Zloty, the RMB, and especially the peso, it looked like they were pretty significant headwinds all year. Can you maybe just elaborate a little bit on what's driving the acceleration of the $60 million?

Jerome Dorlack, Executive Vice President and CFO

Yeah, and so it really comes down to, Rod, our hedging strategies and how our hedging strategies execute, and that we were in a position where we were able to protect or smooth the company, and as a result, our end customers throughout the '23 fiscal year. Obviously, that's temporary. You can't hedge things forever and so as some of those hedges roll off in '24, we're now exposed to the market movements and the dynamics and the shifts of the peso, and so it's really getting to where the peso settles in at now, and that's where you're seeing these movements occurring, and you're seeing this big shift or headwind year-over-year.

Rod Lache, Analyst

Okay. And then also just another housekeeping thing. I'm only seeing, I think you referenced $10 million of reversal on the commodities. You absorbed something like $120 million of commodity headwind this year. Can you talk a little bit about whether that's just conservatism or whether there's something else that's happening there that's changing what you have to absorb versus pass along and maybe just remind us of that bridge to the 8% from here, from what we saw, I guess, excluding that $30 million gain you did, like 5-3 in 2023. How do you see that coming through from volume, your performance, and contract rollovers?

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

I will address the material question first and then move on to the second question. Regarding the material topic, remember that the $120 million includes nearly half related to an inventory revaluation. This is essentially an adjustment on our balance sheet reflecting the current state of our inventory. Additionally, there was a significant non-recurrent benefit in 2022 from a customer settlement that we did not experience again in 2023, contributing to our challenges. For 2024, we have a couple of material-related factors. We expect a $10 million benefit, but we have not finalized our European steel contracts for that year yet. We are currently working through that process. When considering recovery from these material economics deals, it’s important to note that the flow-through on the net commodity line isn't straightforward. It involves negotiating discussions with our customers regarding a variety of products. Historically, we have indicated a recovery range of 70% to 80% on steel, with a lag time of 12 to 18 months. Thus, our recovery mechanisms aren't perfect, and these negotiations will typically involve a mix of products. If we analyze the margin flow from 2022 to 2023, we managed to expand our margins, increasing by nearly 200 basis points despite facing commodity headwinds. This was largely due to our ability to negotiate better terms with customers. Looking ahead to 2024, we are outperforming the typical 16% or 17% contribution margin on volume, largely because we are recovering some commodities through those varied product negotiations. Regarding the path to our 8% margin target, we still need to achieve a run rate of $90 million within the industry, which accounts for about a third of the necessary growth. By the end of this year, we expect to be around 6.4%, but we still have that gap to fill. Another significant factor is the transition of contracts within our network, many of which will be rolling off substantially in the latter half of 2025 and into 2026. We anticipate reaching a full run rate around that 2026 timeframe when those contracts conclude. The remaining piece involves improving our overall business performance to close that gap.

Operator, Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from John Murphy with Bank of America. You may ask your question.

John Murphy, Analyst

Good morning, guys, and congratulations to all of you on sort of a hard-fought next steps in your lives and careers. It's impressive. Just a first question on cash conversion, Jerome, the numbers, obviously, to finish the year were very strong given the focus on cash conservation. The number for '24 looks pretty good. I'm just curious, is there any kind of swing factor to the negative in '24 because there was such a strong performance at the end of '23 and how do you think about cash conversion over the mid to long term in the business?

Jerome Dorlack, Executive Vice President and CFO

In terms of a swing factor, I think there's a couple of things. One is if you look at CapEx as an example, CapEx we ended '23 at, call it, a $260 million run rate, and we'll go into '24 at kind of $310 million level. There were a lot of these cash conservation activities that we had in the business, really driven by Doug and the team. As we knew with the UAW strike, we really had to kind of batten down the hatches and get aggressive from a cash conversion standpoint. So there's that element of normalization. We also had from a couple of customers actually just ARAP timing. Nothing we did, they actually timed it out a bit differently. So there is a swing in there that occurred. We won't necessarily quantify it, but there is a level of swing. So when you think about long-term cash conversion, I'd look at that number that we have in '24, kind of the $300 million on $985 million is the long-term cash conversion rate for the business going forward.

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

I don't know, Mark, if there's anything you want to add.

Mark Oswald, Executive Vice President

The only other thing I'd say, John, when I think about longer term cash conversion, our calls for cash going forward are pretty stable. So if you just think about what the drivers for cash is going to be, it's going to be EBITDA growth, right because I know what my interest is going to be. I know my restructuring is down to a normalized level. My cash taxes, thanks to our plumbing that we've set up is very favorable. So really with the calls for cash stabilized, I'd really look at EBITDA growth and use that as a proxy for where you see pre-cash flow going forward.

John Murphy, Analyst

Okay, that's very helpful. And then just a second question. You guys snuck this in in one of your slides that, in China you're going to swing. you have a leading position in China already, but from 40% Chinese domestic, mix in China to 60%, but you didn't give a timeframe on when that was going to happen. I was wondering if you can maybe talk to that and then also if you've got a handle on, at this point and where this will go over time, the sort of the mix of your vehicles that stay in country versus those that get exported, because obviously it's, China swung to a major export hub in a way over the last two years. So as you're increasing that mix to the Chinese domestics, that might be helpful in market, but might even be more helpful on the export basis. I don't know if you can give us some color on that.

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

So first of all, appreciate your comments on the leadership transition. With regard to that mix of customer change, we're anticipating that's going to happen over definitely in our five-year planning period, probably along a three-year timeline and we're fairly confident in that because when you look three years out, the bookings are if not done are clearly visible, and we view that with a high level of confidence. With regard to the amount of vehicles China is exporting right now, as you know, those are lower level vehicles and have not necessarily been on our radar. Our focus certainly has been on the Chinese domestics, certainly the ones that are growing or outgrowing the market. We're still focused on the luxury segment and still paying attention to our traditional customer base, though we clearly see the mix changing. I don't think it's crystal clear what's going to play out over the course of the next five years. Certainly, there's indications that Europe is going to put up some level of resistance that's probably going to drive domestic Chinese and they've already signaled that to reshore in the European market in Eastern Europe, but if it continues to be an export market and those vehicles shift into the higher-end vehicles, we think we're well-positioned there. If they move and reshore into the European market, we think our infrastructure capability there in Europe, particularly in Eastern Europe puts us in a pretty good position. So we're pretty confident in the way that is going to play out but, as you know, it's not crystal clear how that's all going to come together. But we do understand the competitive advantages that the Chinese have, and that's a compelling case for them to continue to grow market share.

Operator, Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Emmanuel Rosner with Deutsche Bank. You may ask your question.

Emmanuel Rosner, Analyst

Thank you very much. So I appreciate your assessment of the shift in industry dynamics that is now taking place and I wanted to hone in a little bit on electric vehicles in particular. So as you mentioned in the slides and in the prepared remarks, there's a little bit of a push out of some of these launches or reduction of some of the near-term EV volumes, especially in North America. Can you comment to what extent, if any, this is impacting your business? This is impacting your backlog? Does it have an impact on your growth of a market in the near term? And specifically, and maybe second part of this question, when I look at the growth of a market, guided for 2024, which seems to be about a point, maybe a little bit below average, when it seems like you were heading in an above-average type of direction, I'm wondering if EV push-out is a factor within that.

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

Yeah, what's happening on the EV front, as you correctly point out, is primarily a North America-related issue. I think maybe to a lesser degree, a European issue, but if you look at where the penetration is at right now, it's not really having a huge impact on us as a company when we look at our backlog and outlook. Characteristically, what happens with our customers if they pull back on one, they extend a nice platform to offset that. So we still see a relatively stable level of production. In China, we're not seeing any pullback. I think we've got eight significant launches scheduled for China this fiscal year, with no indication at all that our customers are pulling back on those launches. So I'd characterize it as a North America issue, and I'd just look at EV penetration rates as they exist today, being relatively small, not hugely disruptive to how we look at our outlook in the region.

Emmanuel Rosner, Analyst

And I guess the second part of the question around this year's growth of a market, about one point you've been running at one and a half on average for the last three years. I think your comment in the last earnings poll suggested that with this success in China, maybe you could run a little bit above average. This seems to be maybe a little bit less than planned. So can you maybe just discuss the factors in that?

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

Well, I think one is there's a significant foreign exchange weight because of the RMB and our China growth. So the growth is still significantly there in China, but you're seeing a really big FX impact on that. Just a comment, and then two, if you look at what we said last call versus this call, or even for the last year, I think it's really we've said our Europe market will kind of grow at or even slightly below because of planned exits in Europe. That's still holding. North America is kind of at market. That's still really where it's running at, and China is significantly outpacing, and we still expect China to significantly outpace. So there's no, I really don't see any change from that standpoint, Emmanuel, if you would.

Operator, Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Joe with UBS. You may ask your question.

Unidentified Analyst, Analyst

Congratulations to the three of you on the call. To build on that, if North America or the Americas is mostly flat, we could see a decline in Europe. There is growth in China, and when we consider the detailed EBITDA impacts you mentioned, including the transaction effects in the Americas and some of the strategic actions in Europe and China, could you help us understand the performance potential by region? It appears that, from a top-line perspective and some of the cost issues you discussed, most of the margin improvements might need to come from Asia, unless I'm misinterpreting that.

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

Yeah, I'll start out and then Jerome and Mark can make additional comments. I think first and foremost, what I would point to in the Americas and in EMEA is it's still been a very volatile volume market. And as we pointed to in the past, every time volume stabilizes, that means the overall environment is relatively stable. So we get the benefit of volume. But what we get added to that is business performance because we can really drive productivity in our plants and get incremental variable margin out of the business. So when we think about on a go-forward basis, if we get to some stabilization in volume in those two regions, there's added benefit there. With regard to China, I would characterize that as a market that's clearly developing faster than the other markets relative to our product segment. If we just look at the content per vehicle that's being driven in China right now, it's fairly significant to the point where historically it's operated at a lower level of content per vehicle. And as we go out a few years in our planning horizon, we're seeing with EV adoption and the way Chinese automakers are contenting their vehicle from an interior standpoint, we see significant content add. And then if we look at this whole concept of vertical integration as kind of a final piece in the way we've really targeted our new business wins, we're getting a much better vertical integration profile on our business. Definitely in the Americas, it is really the way China continues, and Asia continues to operate and even true, albeit maybe to a lesser degree in Europe. And as we look at that improved vertical integration, that's historically been just a better profitability profile on our business. And again, just a reminder that vertical integration doesn't necessarily mean that we're going to produce all that material because as I think about our business, one of the things we're staying true to is kind of the fundamentals of this business can operate with relatively low margins, but if we're good asset managers, we can generate a lot of cash. So we're looking, it's vertical integration in terms of our ability to control the supply chain. So when we kind of look at it from those different parameters, if you will, I think we're pretty optimistic that stabilization helps us the way our new business comes on and what we're not winning from supply chain control and then just what's happening in China with the amount of content being driven into vehicles, we think that's particularly positive. So we should see performance improvements out of all three regions and not just be dependent on Asia to continue to drive the profitability in the business.

Operator, Operator

And our last question comes from James Picariello with BNP Paribas. You may ask your question.

James Picariello, Analyst

Hi. Good morning, everyone and congrats, Doug on the news. Just two housekeeping ones regarding the equity income outlook, the $20 million year-over-year downside, can you just quantify what portion of that attributes to the Kuiper JV rate? My apologies if I missed that and does that benefit the America segment?

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

We didn't provide the breakdown between how much of that is from the Kuiper JV and how much comes from other JVs in the region. At this time, I don’t think we will share that breakdown. As we progress through the year and see how the equity income begins to come in, we will start to provide that information, but it will be advantageous for the Americas, yes.

James Picariello, Analyst

Okay. Understood. And then on the footprint actions, is in that one slide with all the detail packed around the guide. Is the net EBITDA impact $20 million positive or negative to think of it as a '24 bridge?

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

It's a negative $20 million, with most of it occurring in 2023. We had the chance to deconsolidate one of our operations in China, which was a unique opportunity. Looking ahead, we were able to extract some cash from it, although it offered minimal returns moving forward. We seized that opportunity, which has resulted in a year-over-year impact on our EBITDA. While it was the right decision from a cash perspective, it does create a year-over-year challenge for us regarding consolidated EBITDA.

James Picariello, Analyst

Is there an associated revenue impact as well, since you're deconsolidating it or no?

Doug Del Grosso, President and CEO

Yes, there's an associated revenue impact, but it's more than made up by the increasing sales that we see from our other operations in China.

Mark Oswald, Executive Vice President

Great. And surely it looks like we're at the bottom of the hour. So with that, we'll move to conclude the call. If there's anybody that has additional questions, please feel free to reach out throughout the day. Thank you.

Operator, Operator

Thank you. This does conclude today's call. We thank you for your participation. At this time, you may disconnect your lines.