8-K
Contango Silver & Gold Inc. (CTGO)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
________________
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 26, 2023
CONTANGO ORE, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware<br><br> <br>(State<br> or other jurisdiction of<br><br> <br>incorporation<br><br><br><br><br> or organization) | 001-35770<br><br> <br>(Commission<br><br> <br>File<br> Number) | 27-3431051<br><br> <br>(I.R.S.<br> Employer<br><br> <br>Identification<br><br><br><br><br> No.) |
|---|---|---|
| 3700 Buffalo Speedway,<br> Suite 925<br><br> <br>Houston, Texas<br><br> <br>(Address<br><br><br><br><br> of principal executive offices) | 77098<br><br> <br>(Zip Code) | |
| Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code: (713) 877-1311 | ||
| --- |
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2.):
☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
|---|---|---|
| Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 per share | CTGO | NYSE American |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§ 230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§ 240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Item 8.01. Other Events.
Technical Report Summary
On May 26, 2023, Contango ORE, Inc. (the “Company” or “Contango”) announced that it had completed its Technical Report Summary, dated May 12, 2023 (the “TRS”), on the Manh Choh Project (the “Project”) in accordance with the mining property disclosure rules specified in subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K. A copy of the TRS is filed as Exhibit 96.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. A copy of the related press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
The TRS summarizes the results of a Feasibility Study (“FS”) and subsequent FS economic update prepared by KG Mining (Alaska), Inc., Contango’s joint venture partner for the Project and an indirect subsidiary of Kinross Gold Corporation. The foregoing description of the TRS does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the TRS attached hereto as Exhibit 96.1.
Russell Indexes
On May 30, 2023, the Company announced that it is set to join the broad-market Russell 3000® and Russell Microcap® Indexes at the conclusion of the 2023 Russell indexes annual reconstitution, effective after the US market opens on June 26, 2023. Russell indexes are widely used by investment managers and institutional investors for index funds and as benchmarks for active investment strategies. A copy of the press release is filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits.
| Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit |
|---|---|
| 96.1 | Technical Report Summary, dated<br> May 12, 2023. |
| 99.1 | Press Release of the Company,<br> dated May 26, 2023 |
| 99.2 | Press Release of the Company,<br> dated May 30, 2023 |
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document). |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| CONTANGO ORE, INC. |
|---|
| By: /s/ Leah Gaines |
| Leah Gaines |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting |
| Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
Dated: June 1, 2023
Exhibit 96.1
TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY ON THE MANH CHOH PROJECT, ALASKA, USA
PREPARED FOR CONTANGO ORE, INC.
S-K 1300 Report
Qualified Person:
Sims Resources LLC
May 12, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
| PAGE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 1-1 | |
| 1.1 | Conclusions | 1-2 | |
| 1.2 | Recommendations | 1-8 | |
| 1.3 | Economic Analysis | 1-10 | |
| 1.4 | Technical Summary | 1-17 | |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION | 2-1 | |
| 2.1 | Site Visits | 2-2 | |
| 2.2 | Sources of Information | 2-2 | |
| 2.3 | List of Abbreviations and Acronyms | 2-3 | |
| 3. | PROPERTY DESCRIPTION | 3-1 | |
| 3.1 | Location | 3-1 | |
| 3.2 | Land Tenure | 3-3 | |
| 3.3 | Environmental Liabilities | 3-6 | |
| 4. | ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY | 4-1 | |
| 4.1 | Accessibility | 4-1 | |
| 4.2 | Climate | 4-3 | |
| 4.3 | Local Resources and Infrastructure | 4-3 | |
| 4.4 | Physiography | 4-4 | |
| 5. | HISTORY | 5-1 | |
| 5.1 | Prior Ownership | 5-1 | |
| 5.2 | Exploration History | 5-1 | |
| 5.3 | Past Production | 5-10 | |
| 6. | GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION, AND DEPOSIT | 6-1 | |
| 6.1 | Regional Geology | 6-1 | |
| 6.2 | Local Geology | 6-3 | |
| 6.3 | Property Geology | 6-1 | |
| 6.4 | Mineralization | 6-4 | |
| 6.5 | Deposit Type | 6-8 | |
| 7. | EXPLORATION | 7-1 | |
| 7.1 | Exploration | 7-1 | |
| 7.2 | Drilling | 7-14 | |
| 7.3 | Geotechnical, Hydrological and Metallurgical Drilling | 7-20 | |
| 7.4 | Qualified Person's Opinion on Drilling Programs | 7-21 | |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page i | ||
| --- | --- |

| 8. | SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES, AND SECURITY | 8-1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | Sampling Method and Approach | 8-1 | |
| 8.2 | Density | 8-1 | |
| 8.3 | Analytical Laboratories | 8-2 | |
| 8.4 | Sample Preparation | 8-2 | |
| 8.5 | Sample Analysis | 8-3 | |
| 8.6 | Quality Assurance and Quality Control | 8-3 | |
| 8.7 | Sample Storage and Security | 8-6 | |
| 8.8 | Qualified Person's Opinion on Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security | 8-6 | |
| 9. | DATA VERIFICATION | 9-1 | |
| 9.1 | Qualified Person’s Opinion on Adequacy of the Data | 9-1 | |
| 10. | MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING | 10-1 | |
| 10.1 | Test Work Programs and Laboratories | 10-1 | |
| 10.2 | Metallurgical Sampling Programs | 10-1 | |
| 10.3 | Metallurgical Characterization | 10-4 | |
| 10.4 | Metallurgical Testing | 10-10 | |
| 10.5 | Process Selection | 10-43 | |
| 10.6 | Qualified Person’s Opinion on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing | 10-49 | |
| 11. | MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES | 11-1 | |
| 11.1 | Summary | 11-1 | |
| 11.2 | Resource Database | 11-3 | |
| 11.3 | Geological Interpretation | 11-5 | |
| 11.4 | Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) | 11-10 | |
| 11.5 | Black Modelling and Grade Estimation | 11-23 | |
| 11.6 | Model Validation | 11-37 | |
| 11.7 | Resource Classification | 11-42 | |
| 11.8 | Mineral Resource Reporting | 11-43 | |
| 11.9 | Qualified Person’s Opinion and Recommendations | 11-46 | |
| 12. | MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES | 12-1 | |
| 12.1 | Summary | 12-1 | |
| 12.2 | Dilution and Ore Loss | 12-1 | |
| 12.3 | Cut-off Grade | 12-2 | |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page ii | ||
| --- | --- |

| 13. | MINING METHODS | 13-1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.1 | Mine Design Considerations | 13-1 | |
| 13.2 | Mine Configuration | 13-9 | |
| 13.3 | Design of Waste Storage Facilities | 13-18 | |
| 13.4 | Ore Inventory | 13-19 | |
| 13.5 | Mine Production Sequence and Schedules | 13-20 | |
| 13.6 | Mine Equipment and Facilities | 13-23 | |
| 13.7 | Mine Labor Requirements | 13-25 | |
| 14. | PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS | 14-1 | |
| 14.1 | Facility Description | 14-1 | |
| 14.2 | Processing Production Sequence and Schedules | 14-11 | |
| 15. | INFRASTRUCTURE | 15-1 | |
| 15.1 | Planned Infrastructure | 15-1 | |
| 15.2 | Mine Site Roads | 15-5 | |
| 15.3 | Mine Site Buildings | 15-7 | |
| 15.4 | Mine Site Utilities | 15-9 | |
| 15.5 | Mine Site Waste Disposal | 15-15 | |
| 15.6 | Fort Knox Infrastructure | 15-15 | |
| 16. | MARKET STUDIES | 16-1 | |
| 16.1 | Product Specification | 16-1 | |
| 16.2 | Demand and Supply Forecasts | 16-1 | |
| 16.3 | Marketing Strategy | 16-2 | |
| 16.4 | Marketing Plan | 16-3 | |
| 16.5 | Product Distribution | 16-3 | |
| 17. | ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS, OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS | 17-1 | |
| 17.1 | Summary | 17-1 | |
| 17.2 | Corporate Policies | 17-2 | |
| 17.3 | Operation and Management | 17-2 | |
| 17.4 | Environmental Studies | 17-3 | |
| 17.5 | Management of Impacts | 17-15 | |
| 17.6 | Legal Requirements and Permitting | 17-24 | |
| 17.7 | Stakeholder and Community Relations | 17-29 | |
| 17.8 | Mine Closure Planning | 17-34 | |
| 17.9 | Qualified Person’s opinion on Environmental Compliance, Permitting, and Local Individuals or Groups | 17-34 | |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page iii | ||
| --- | --- |

| 18. | CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS | 18-1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.1 | Capital Costs | 18-1 | |
| 18.2 | Operation Costs | 18-2 | |
| 19. | ECONOMIC ANALYSIS | 19-1 | |
| 20. | ADJACENT PROPERTIES | 20-1 | |
| 20.1 | Triple Z | 20-3 | |
| 20.2 | Hona | 20-3 | |
| 20.3 | Eagle | 20-6 | |
| 21. | OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION | 21-1 | |
| 22. | INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS | 22-1 | |
| 22.1 | Geology and Mineral Resources | 22-1 | |
| 22.2 | Mining and Mineral Reserves | 22-2 | |
| 22.3 | Mineral Processing | 22-3 | |
| 22.4 | Environmental and Social Considerations | 22-5 | |
| 23. | RECOMMENDATIONS | 23-1 | |
| 23.1 | Geology and Mineral Resources | 23-1 | |
| 23.2 | Mining and Mineral Reserves | 23-1 | |
| 23.3 | Mineral Processing | 23-2 | |
| 23.4 | Environmental and Social Considerations | 23-2 | |
| 24. | REFERENCES | 24-1 | |
| 25. | RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT | 25-1 | |
| 26. | DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE | 26-1 |
LIST OF TABLES
| PAGE | ||
|---|---|---|
| Table 1‑1 | Project Capital Costs | 1-11 |
| Table 1‑2 | Summary of Contango Model Cash Flow Results | 1-13 |
| Table 1‑3 | Sensitivity Analysis Summary | 1-15 |
| Table 1‑4 | Mineral Resource Estimate as of December 31, 2022 – Peak Gold 100% Attributable Ownership | 1-20 |
| Table 1‑5 | Mineral Resource Estimate as of December 31, 2022 – Contango 30% Attributable Ownership | 1-20 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page iv | |
| --- | --- |

| Table 1‑6 | Mineral Reserve Estimate as of December 31, 2022 – Peak Gold 100% Attributable Ownership | 1-21 |
|---|---|---|
| Table 1‑7 | Mineral Reserve Estimate as of December 31, 2022 – Contango 30% Attributable Ownership | 1-21 |
| Table 1‑8 | Project Capital Cost Summary | 1-27 |
| Table 3-1 | Mineral Rights and Properties Summary | 3-3 |
| Table 4-1 | Tok, Alaska Monthly Climate Summary, Period of Record June 1954 to April 2016 | 4-3 |
| Table 5-1 | Summary of Historical Work on Manh Choh Project | 5-3 |
| Table 7-1 | Summary of Drill Holes from the Manh Choh Project | 7-14 |
| Table 7-2 | 2021 Collar Verification Results | 7-16 |
| Table 10‑1 | SGS Test Composites Summary | 10-2 |
| Table 10-2 | Sample Selection Criteria | 10-3 |
| Table 10-3 | 2014 SGS Gold Mineral Occurrence | 10-5 |
| Table 10-4 | 2021 PII SLS Test Result | 10-7 |
| Table 10-5 | 2021 MLI Comminution Test Results | 10-9 |
| Table 10‑6 | SMC Test Results | 10-9 |
| Table 10-7 | Parameters Derived from the SMC Test Results | 10-9 |
| Table 10-8 | MLI Leaching Test Procedures Matrix | 10-21 |
| Table 10-9 | 2021 MLI Leach Test Conditions | 10-26 |
| Table 10-10 | 2014 SGS Flotation Tests | 10-30 |
| Table 10-11 | 2014 KCA Flotation Tests | 10-31 |
| Table 10-12 | Gravity Tests Summary | 10-33 |
| Table 10-13 | Overall Metallurgical Results, Gravity Concentration Tailings Cyanidation Tests | 10-38 |
| Table 10-14 | Summary Metallurgical Results, Gravity Concentration Tailings Cyanidation Tests | 10-39 |
| Table 10-15 | Results of Flowsheet Option Study | 10-43 |
| Table 10-16 | Design Criteria | 10-43 |
| Table 10-17 | Potential Process Improvements | 10-45 |
| Table 10-18 | Actual vs. Modeled Recoveries | 10-48 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page v | |
| --- | --- |

| Table 11‑1 | Mineral Resource Estimate as of December 31, 2022 – Peak Gold 100% Attributable Ownership | 11-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Table 11‑2 | Mineral Resource Estimate as of December 31, 2022 – Contango 30% Attributable Ownership | 11-3 |
| Table 11‑3 | Summary of Drill Holes Excluded from the Model Dataset | 11-4 |
| Table 11‑4 | Lithogeochemical Cluster Given Logged Lithology for Skarn and Minor Skarn | 11-6 |
| Table 11‑5 | Domain Flagging | 11-8 |
| Table 11‑6 | Uncapped Raw Assay Statistics within Manh Choh South and North | 11-12 |
| Table 11‑7 | Manh Choh Assay Capping Strategy | 11-15 |
| Table 11‑8 | Manh Choh Uncapped and Capped Gold Assay Statistics by Domain and Deposit | 11-16 |
| Table 11‑9 | Manh Choh Uncapped and Capped Silver Assay Statistics by Domain and Deposit | 11-17 |
| Table 11‑10 | Manh Choh Global Capped Composite Statistics | 11-20 |
| Table 11‑11 | Model Setup Parameters | 11-24 |
| Table 11‑12 | Block Search Anisotropy Parameters | 11-25 |
| Table 11‑13 | Variogram Parameters for Gold and Silver | 11-27 |
| Table 11‑14 | Gold Grade ID^3^Estimate Parameters | 11-33 |
| Table 11‑15 | Silver Grade ID^3^Estimate Parameters | 11-34 |
| Table 11‑16 | Soft Boundary Composite Selection Criteria for Gold and Silver Estimate | 11-35 |
| Table 11‑17 | Global Comparison of Uncapped, Capped and Declustered 10 ft Composites to ID^3^and NN Estimates | 11-38 |
| Table 11‑18 | Summary of Mineral Resources as of December 31, 2022 – Peak Gold, LLC’s 100% Ownership | 11-45 |
| Table 11‑19 | Summary of Mineral Resources as of December 31, 2022 – Contango’s 30% Attributable Ownership | 11-45 |
| Table 12-1 | Mineral Reserve Estimate as of December 31, 2022 – Peak Gold 100% Attributable Ownership | 12-1 |
| Table 12-2 | Mineral Reserve Estimate as of December 31, 2022 – Contango 30% Attributable Ownership | 12-1 |
| Table 12-3 | Mineral Reserve Cut-off Grade Inputs | 12-3 |
| Table 13-1 | Geotechnical Domains | 13-3 |
| Table 13-2 | Geotechnical Design Criteria | 13-4 |
| Table 13-3 | Geotechnical Codes in Planning Model and Optimization Slope Code Inputs | 13-7 |
| Table 13-4 | Pit Shell Optimization Inputs | 13-9 |
| Table 13-5 | Mineral Reserve Pit shell Inventory | 13-10 |
| Table 13-6 | WRSA Slope Design Criteria | 13-18 |
| Table 13-7 | Waste balance – Major WRSA and Stockpile facilities | 13-19 |
| Table 13-8 | Ore inventory | 13-19 |
| Table 13-9 | Key Performance Metrics – Load and Haul | 13-24 |
| Table 13-10 | Ancillary Equipment List | 13-25 |
| Table 13-11 | Manh Choh Labor REquirements | 13-26 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page vi | |
| --- | --- |

| Table 14‑1 | Cyanide Consumption st/year | 14-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Table 14‑2 | LOM Production and Metal Recovery | 14-12 |
| Table 17‑1 | Manh Choh Project Baseline Survey Reports Issued | 17-3 |
| Table 17‑2 | Impact Definitions | 17-10 |
| Table 17‑3 | Impact Summary | 17-11 |
| Table 17‑4 | Summary of Assessed Impacts of the Manh Choh Project | 17-11 |
| Table 17‑5 | Non-Issue Resource Categories | 17-14 |
| Table 17‑6 | Relevant Permitting Strategy and Schedule Summary | 17-26 |
| Table 17‑7 | Summary of Potential State of Alaska Permit and Authorization Requirements | 17-28 |
| Table 18‑1 | Summary of Project Capital Costs | 18-1 |
| Table 19‑1 | Project Capital Costs | 19-2 |
| Table 19‑2 | Annual Cash Flow Model | 19-5 |
| Table 19‑3 | Sensitivity Analysis Summary | 19-7 |
| Table 20‑1 | Contango’s 100% Owned State Mining Claims | 20-1 |
LIST OF FIGURES
| Figure 1‑1 | After-tax NPV at 5% Sensitivity Analysis | 1-16 |
|---|---|---|
| Figure 3‑1 | Location Map | 3-2 |
| Figure 3-2 | Location of State Claims and Tetlin Leased Lands | 3-4 |
| Figure 4‑1 | Site Access | 4-2 |
| Figure 6‑1 | Regional Geology of the Yukon Tanana Uplands, Eastern and Central Alaska | 6-2 |
| Figure 6‑2 | Stratigraphy of the Manh Choh Project, Chief Danny Area | 6-6 |
| Figure 6‑3 | Typical Cross Section of Local Geology | 6-1 |
| Figure 6‑4 | Generalized Geology of the Chief Danny area including the Manh Choh South and North Deposits of the Tetlin Project, Alaska | 6-2 |
| Figure 6‑5 | Age Dates | 6-3 |
| Figure 6‑6 | Reflected Light Photomicrograph of Au-Amphibole Skarn | 6-5 |
| Figure 6‑7 | Location of Manh Choh Deposit within an Idealized Model of a Hydrothermal System | 6-10 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page vii | |
| --- | --- |

| Figure 7‑1 | Chief Danny District Prospectivity Analysis | 7-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Figure 7‑2 | Manh Choh South Deposit Cross-Section 9735 oriented 045° - MAG and IP Chargeability | 7-7 |
| Figure 7‑3 | Manh Choh North Deposit Cross-Section 10030 oriented 045° - MAG and IP Chargeability | 7-8 |
| Figure 7‑4 | Manh Choh West Resource Target Area | 7-10 |
| Figure 7‑5 | Inverse Distance Grid of Gold in Soils, Chief Danny Area | 7-11 |
| Figure 7‑6 | Inverse Distance Grid of Copper, Arsenic, Lead, and Zinc in Soils, Chief Danny Area | 7-12 |
| Figure 7‑7 | Drill Hole Plan | 7-15 |
| Figure 7‑8 | Core Logging Facility in Tok, Tetlin Project, Alaska | 7-18 |
| Figure 7‑9 | Example of Split Core Prior to Sampling, Tetlin Project, Alaska | 7-19 |
| Figure 8‑1 | Standards Pairs Plot, 2011 through 2021 | 8-4 |
| Figure 8‑2 | Pulp Replicate Gold Assay Results | 8-5 |
| Figure 8‑3 | Coarse Reject Replicate Assay Results | 8-5 |
| Figure 8‑4 | Field Replicate Assay Results | 8-6 |
| Figure 10‑1 | KCA and MLI Drill Core Samples Prior to 2020 | 10-2 |
| Figure 10‑2 | MLI 2021 Drill Core Samples | 10-3 |
| Figure 10‑3 | 2018 BV Mineral Distribution | 10-6 |
| Figure 10‑4 | Mineral Distribution by Mineral Lab, Inc. | 10-7 |
| Figure 10‑5 | 2014 KCA BRT Gold and Silver Extraction Rates | 10-11 |
| Figure 10‑6 | 2014 KCA BRT Gold Leaching Kinetics | 10-11 |
| Figure 10‑7 | 2014 KCA BRT Sodium Cyanide and Lime Consumption | 10-12 |
| Figure 10‑8 | 2014 KCA Reagent Consumption Rates and Gold and Silver Recoveries as a Function of Total Sulfur Concentration | 10-13 |
| Figure 10‑9 | 2017 MLI MCN Gold Leaching Kinetics | 10-14 |
| Figure 10‑10 | 2017 MLI MCN Leach Test Reagent Consumption | 10-15 |
| Figure 10‑11 | 2018 MLI BRT MCS Reagent Consumption and Gold and Silver recoveries as a Function of Total Sulfur Concentration | 10-16 |
| Figure 10‑12 | 2018 MLI Gold and Silver Extraction Rates Using TP-1 and TP-2 on MCS Composites | 10-17 |
| Figure 10‑13 | 2018 MLI Gold Leaching Kinetics Using TP-1 and TP-2 on MCS Composites | 10-18 |
| Figure 10‑14 | 2018 MLI Reagent Consumptions Using TP-1 and TP-2 on MCS Composites | 10-19 |
| Figure 10‑15 | 2018 MLI Gold and Silver Extraction Rates Using TP-1 and TP-2 on MCN Composites | 10-20 |
| Figure 10‑16 | 2018 MLI Gold Leaching Kinetics Using TP-1 and TP-2 on MCN Composites | 10-20 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page viii | |
| --- | --- |

| Figure 10‑17 | 2018 MLI Reagent Consumptions Using TP-1 and TP-2 on MCN Composites | 10-21 |
|---|---|---|
| Figure 10‑18 | MCS South Leach Condition Optimization TP-1 to TP-6 | 10-23 |
| Figure 10‑19 | MCS Gold Leaching Kinetics on TP-1 to 6 | 10-23 |
| Figure 10‑20 | MCS Leach Condition Optimization TP-1, 2, 7 to 10 | 10-24 |
| Figure 10‑21 | MCS Gold Leaching Kinetics on TP-1, 2, 7 to 10 | 10-24 |
| Figure 10‑22 | Leach Grind Size Optimization | 10-25 |
| Figure 10‑23 | Leaching Condition Optimization | 10-27 |
| Figure 10‑24 | Blending Test – Actual vs. Expected Gold Recovery | 10-28 |
| Figure 10‑25 | 2014 SGS Flotation Tests – Gold Recovery and Mass Pull | 10-30 |
| Figure 10‑26 | 2014 KCA Gold Recovery and Mass Pull as a Function of Total Sulfur Content | 10-31 |
| Figure 10‑27 | 2019 MLI Gold Rougher Recovery and Mass Pull as a Function of Total Sulfur Content | 10-32 |
| Figure 10‑28 | Gold and Silver Recovery – Gravity Concentration | 10-35 |
| Figure 10‑29 | EGRG vs. Grind Size | 10-35 |
| Figure 10‑30 | Cumulative EGRG by Size Fraction | 10-36 |
| Figure 10‑31 | Gold Distribution in Magnetic Separation | 10-37 |
| Figure 10‑32 | Gold and Silver Recoveries – Gravity and Cyanide Leaching Tests | 10-40 |
| Figure 10‑33 | Reagent Consumption – Gravity and Cyanide Leaching Tests | 10-40 |
| Figure 10‑34 | Gold Recovery – Blending Tests | 10-41 |
| Figure 10‑35 | Flowsheet – Gravity/Rougher/Cyanidation | 10-42 |
| Figure 10‑36 | Flowsheet – Gravity/Rougher and Cleaner/Cyanidation | 10-42 |
| Figure 10‑37 | Actual vs. Modeled Recoveries | 10-49 |
| Figure 11‑1 | Location Map of Manh Choh South and North Deposits, Manh choh Project, Alaska | 11-2 |
| Figure 11‑2 | Lithogeochemical Cluster Characterization of Manh Choh | 11-6 |
| Figure 11‑3 | Cross Section of Manh Choh South and North showing Domain Lithology Block and Drill hole Code, Looking Northwest | 11-9 |
| Figure 11‑4 | Detail of Manh Choh South and North Skarn Domain Codes | 11-9 |
| Figure 11‑5 | Cross Section of Manh Choh South and North showing Redox Block and Drill hole Code, Looking Northwest | 11-10 |
| Figure 11‑6 | Raw Run-Length Statistics for Valid Assay Data | 11-11 |
| Figure 11‑7 | Log Scatterplot of Capped Au Assays and Cobalt and Correlation Matrix | 11-12 |
| Figure 11‑8 | Gold Capping Log Probability Plots for South primary skarn (upper) and North skarn (lower) | 11-14 |
| Figure 11‑9 | Composite Length Statistics | 11-18 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page ix | |
| --- | --- |

| Figure 11‑10 | Cell Declustering of Capped Composites | 11-19 |
|---|---|---|
| Figure 11‑11 | Composite Contact Plot of Gold within Estimate Domains | 11-22 |
| Figure 11‑12 | Block Search Anisotropy Detail with idealized search ellipsoids elongated along strike | 11-26 |
| Figure 11‑13 | Example Normal Scores Back-Transform Variogram for South Primary Skarn (domain 201) | 11-28 |
| Figure 11‑14 | Gold Estimate Search Ellipse in Plan View (top) and NW-looking Cross Section (below) | 11-31 |
| Figure 11‑15 | Gold High Grade Restriction Search Shown in green versus domain 201 Search Ellipse in blue | 11-31 |
| Figure 11‑16 | Silver Estimate Search Ellipse in Plan View (top) and NW-looking Cross Section (below) | 11-32 |
| Figure 11‑17 | Cross Section Comparison of Domain Approach, NN, and ID^3^Estimates for Manh Choh | 11-37 |
| Figure 11‑18 | SWATH Plot Gold 045 azimuth (X axis) | 11-38 |
| Figure 11‑19 | SWATH Plot Gold 315 azimuth (Y axis) | 11-39 |
| Figure 11‑20 | SWATH Plot Gold (Z axis) | 11-39 |
| Figure 11‑21 | SWATH Plot Silver 045 azimuth (X-axis) | 11-40 |
| Figure 11‑22 | SWATH Plot Silver 315 azimuth (Y axis) | 11-40 |
| Figure 11‑23 | SWATH Plot Silver (Z axis) | 11-41 |
| Figure 11‑24 | Grade Tonnage Curve Comparison of ID3 (red) to OK (blue) and NN (yellow) | 11-42 |
| Figure 11‑25 | Plan View of Mahn Choh North and south deposits Block Model Classification (2021 drill collars in blue) | 11-43 |
| Figure 13‑1 | Pit Cross Section Showing Alteration Model | 13-3 |
| Figure 13‑2 | Geotechnical Codes in Planning Model | 13-6 |
| Figure 13‑3 | Mineral Reserve Pit shells vs. Design Pit Outlines | 13-10 |
| Figure 13‑4 | Manh Choh Pit Designs | 13-12 |
| Figure 13‑5 | MCS design, Phases 1 and 2 | 13-12 |
| Figure 13‑6 | MCN Design | 13-13 |
| Figure 13‑7 | MCS Pit Phases | 13-14 |
| Figure 13‑8 | Mine Site Layout | 13-15 |
| Figure 13‑9 | Plan view of In-Pit Backfill | 13-16 |
| Figure 13‑10 | MCS In-Pit Backfill | 13-17 |
| Figure 13‑11 | MCN In-Pit Backfill | 13-17 |
| Figure 13‑12 | Annual Mining Rate by Phase | 13-20 |
| Figure 13‑13 | Quarterly Ore and Waste Mining Rates | 13-21 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page x | |
| --- | --- |

| Figure 13‑14 | Annual Ore Stockpile Movement | 13-21 |
|---|---|---|
| Figure 13‑15 | Annual Waste Movement by Destination (Rehandle Included) | 13-22 |
| Figure 14‑1 | Simplified Block Flow Diagram of Modified Process | 14-2 |
| Figure 14‑2 | General Arrangement of CN Detoxification Circuit | 14-6 |
| Figure 15‑1 | Site General Arrangement – Manh Choh | 15-3 |
| Figure 15‑2 | Site General Arrangement – Fort Knox | 15-4 |
| Figure 15‑3 | Mine Access Road | 15-6 |
| Figure 19‑1 | After-tax NPV at 5% Sensitivity Analysis | 19-8 |
| Figure 20‑1 | Contango’s 100% Owned State Mining Claims | 20-2 |
| Figure 20‑2 | Hona Geology, Prospects, Drill Holes and Geophysics | 20-4 |
| Figure 20‑3 | Hona - Coincident Mag-VTEM with Geochemistry and Favorable Porphyry/IRG Geology | 20-5 |
| Figure 20‑4 | Strong Multiple-Element Geochemistry on Dome and Eagle Target Areas | 20-6 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page xi | |
| --- | --- |

- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Sims Resources LLC (SR) was retained by Contango ORE, Inc. (Contango) to prepare a Technical Report Summary (TRS) on the Manh Choh Project (the Project or Manh Choh), located near Tok, Alaska, U.S.A. The purpose of this TRS is to summarize the results of a Feasibility Study (FS) and subsequent FS economic update prepared by KG Mining (Alaska), Inc. (KGMA), Contango’s joint venture partner for the Project and an indirect subsidiary of Kinross Gold Corporation (Kinross). This TRS conforms to United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Modernized Property Disclosure Requirements for Mining Registrants as described in Subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K, Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (S-K 1300) and Item 601(b)(96) Technical Report Summary.
Contango is a New York Stock Exchange-American (NYSE-American) listed company that engages in exploration for gold and associated minerals in Alaska. It holds a 30% interest in Peak Gold, LLC (or Peak Gold JV), which leases approximately 675,000 acres of exploration and development, with the remaining 70% owned by KGMA, operator and manager of the Project. Contango also owns a 100% interest in approximately 167,000 acres of State of Alaska mining claims through Contango Mineral Alaska, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary, which gives Contango the exclusive right to explore and develop minerals on these lands.
The Project has been actively explored since 2009 when gold mineralization was discovered in a favourable geological environment for mid-Cretaceous intrusive-related gold deposits of the Tintina Gold Belt as well as late Cretaceous to mid-Tertiary porphyry copper-molybdenum gold and related gold skarn deposits. Two distal gold skarn deposits have been delineated, Manh Choh North (MCN) and Manh Choh South (MCS), and there is excellent potential to discover additional deposits on the Project.
The Project was previously named “Peak Gold” but was renamed “Manh Choh” in March 2021 after close consultation with the local Upper Tanana Athabascan Village of Tetlin and the landowner. The Project contains a relatively high-grade gold deposit. The FS contemplates 4.6 years of open pit production at a life-of-mine (LOM) average mining rate of approximately 10.8 million tonnes per year (tpa). Ore from the Project will be processed at Kinross’ Fort Knox processing facilities, located approximately 400 km by paved highway northwest of the Project.
All economic values presented in this TRS are in United States dollars (US$).
Unless stated otherwise, all tonnages are dry metric tonnes and all ounces are troy ounces.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-1 |
|---|

1.1. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the review of the available information, the Qualified Person (QP) provides the following conclusions:
1.1.1. GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
| • | The northern part of the Project is located in rocks that are highly prospective for mid-Cretaceous intrusive related gold deposits as well as two intersecting belts of mid-Cretaceous to mid-Tertiary porphyry<br> copper-molybdenum-gold deposits and porphyry related distal gold skarn deposits. |
|---|---|
| • | The drilling, sampling, sample preparation, analysis, and data verification procedures meet or exceed industry standard, and are appropriate for the estimation of Mineral Resources. |
| --- | --- |
| • | As of December 31, 2022, Manh Choh Mineral Resources (100% Peak Gold JV attributable ownership basis) comprise: |
| --- | --- |
| o | Indicated Mineral Resources of approximately 845,700 metric tonnes (t) grading 2.4 grams per metric tonne (g/t) gold (Au) and 9.3 g/t silver (Ag) for approximately 65,290 contained ounces (oz) Au and 252,140<br> contained oz Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Inferred Mineral Resources of approximately 21,400 t grading 3.8 g/t Au and 9.2 g/t Ag for approximately 2,570 contained oz Au and 6,290 contained oz Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| --- | --- |
| • | As of December 31, 2022, Manh Choh Mineral Resources held by Contango (30% attributable ownership basis) comprise: |
| --- | --- |
| o | Indicated Mineral Resources of approximately 253,700 t grading 2.4 g/t Au and 9.3 g/t Ag for approximately 19,590 contained oz Au and 75,640 contained oz Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Inferred Mineral Resources of approximately 6,400 t grading 3.8 g/t Au and 9.2 g/t Ag for approximately 770 contained oz Au and 1,890 contained oz Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The QP is of the opinion that with consideration of the recommendations in this TRS, any issues relating to all relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction<br> can be resolved with further work. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The deposits remain open and present exploration potential beyond the current Mineral Resources. As the area is underexplored, there is good potential to delineate additional exploration targets on the Lease. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-2 |
| --- | --- |

1.1.2. MINING AND MINERAL RESERVES
MINE DESIGN
| • | Pit slope design criteria used to develop the FS pit slope designs are at a Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) level of study/confidence. Stability analyses have not been completed on the final FS pit slope designs. |
|---|---|
| • | A geotechnical stability analysis was completed on the Project’s waste rock stockpile areas (WRSAs) and confirmed a low risk of WRSA instability. WRSAs are designed with 3:1 side slopes for ease of final<br> reclamation and are generally located on hilltops where adverse sub-surface conditions and movement are not expected. The northeast walls of MCS may require approximately 33 ft to 50 ft of horizontal depressurization to attain acceptable<br> factors of safety. The extent to which horizontal depressurization is required will need to be confirmed once mining has progressed beyond the elevation of the groundwater table. Due to the overall low-flow groundwater regime, dedicated<br> dewatering wells are not expected to be required. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A series of pit shells were generated based on varying gold price input factors. The pit shell corresponding to Mineral Reserve prices of $1,300/oz Au and $17/oz Ag was selected as the basis for the ultimate<br> pit design. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Portions of the detailed pit designs vary significantly from the MCN and MCS pit limits suggested by the ultimate pit shell analysis. This is due to: |
| --- | --- |
| o | The degree of accuracy that is possible when modeling complex pit slopes and transitions in a pit shell optimization as compared to completing detailed design. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The pit shell optimization over-smooths the influence of in-pit ramps on overall slope angle. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The narrower than minimum mining widths that result during pit shell optimization. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The degree of accuracy that is possible when allowing the pit shell optimization to achieve the corner design for the northeast wall of MCS. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Several pit shell sensitivity scenarios were investigated, including sensitivity to metal price, mining cost, transport and processing cost, and slope angles. Generally, there is no material change to the<br> ultimate pit limits for a range of Base Case inputs. This is a result of the high grade, high margin nature of the in-situ mineralization. |
| --- | --- |
OPERATIONS
| • | Completing extraction in MCN early in the LOM plan is an important Project objective as it: |
|---|---|
| o | Enables hauling of waste rock from MCS directly into MCN, thereby keeping ex-pit haulage costs to a minimum. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Facilitates short hauls in a truck-constrained period of the LOM plan. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Serves as a long-term waste storage facility to minimize the size of ex-pit waste stockpiles (WRSAs) that would otherwise require rehandling to meet closure obligations. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Key mining equipment performance metrics are based on both internal and external benchmarks for similar equipment, are unchanged in all LOM plan time periods, and are used as a measure of maximum productive<br> hours to drive the LOM plan. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-3 |
| --- | --- |

| • | During the Project’s operating phase, waste rock swell factors will be investigated to confirm WRSA designs and storage capacity. In the event that additional waste rock storage capacity is required, or MCN<br> in-pit backfill capacity is not available as planned, sections of the Main WRSA may be constructed to greater than 3:1 slopes. |
|---|---|
| • | The Project will require a rigorous grade control program to mitigate mining dilution and ore loss. Program elements will include blasthole sampling in ore and waste blasts, high-precision global position<br> system (GPS) equipment on loading units, and blast movement monitoring activities. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The selected highway transport rate (3,000 U.S. short tons per day (stpd) ore) requires that ore stockpiles be maintained to disconnect the variable ex-pit ore mining rate from the ore delivery rate to the Fort<br> Knox process plant. Maintaining a consistent ore delivery rate is important to allow the transport contractor to maintain steady-state operations and for the Project not to incur standby charges. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The Project’s labor strategy will include both shared responsibilities with existing Fort Knox personnel and dedicated Manh Choh labor on rotational schedules. Mine site leadership positions will report to the<br> Fort Knox Mine Manager. |
| --- | --- |
MINERAL RESERVES
| • | As of December 31, 2022, Manh Choh Mineral Reserves (100% Peak Gold JV attributable ownership basis) comprise Probable Mineral Reserves of approximately 3.94 million metric tonnes (Mt) grading 7.9 g/t Au and<br> 13.6 g/t Ag for approximately 997,143 contained oz Au and 1,718,571 contained oz Ag. |
|---|---|
| • | As of December 31, 2022, Manh Choh Mineral Reserves held by Contango (30% attributable ownership basis) comprise Probable Mineral Reserves of approximately 1.18 Mt grading 7.9 g/t Au and 13.6 g/t Ag for<br> approximately 299,143 contained oz Au and 515,571 contained oz Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The QP is not aware of any risk factors associated with, or changes to, any aspects of the modifying factors such as mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, or other relevant factors that could<br> materially affect the Mineral Reserve estimate. |
| --- | --- |
1.1.3. MINERAL PROCESSING
METALLURGICAL CHARACTERIZATION
| • | Mineralogy analysis, analyses on cleaner flotation concentrates and tailings, and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis indicate that the predominant sulfide mineral in the MCS deposit is pyrrhotite while the<br> predominant copper mineral is chalcopyrite. Gold was observed in samples and is predominantly free gold and electrum. |
|---|---|
| • | XRD, QEMSCAN, optical microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) equipped with Energy Dispersive Spectrometers (EDS), and chemical analysis found that samples contain moderate (10% to 30%) to major<br> (>30%) pyrrhotite and suggest a gold recovery circuit design having gravity concentration followed by finer grinding for further liberation. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In 2018, seven metallurgical composites were tested to measure abrasion index, Bond ball mill work index, and rod mill work index. Samples selected were well distributed in both pits. In 2021, four master<br> composites and eight variability composites were tested. The results of this testing demonstrate that all samples are between soft and medium hardness and abrasiveness. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-4 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Two sulfide master composite samples that were sent for semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill comminution (SMC) testing yielded one sample with medium to soft hardness and the other sample considered to be hard. |
|---|
METALLURGICAL TESTING
| • | Results of metallurgical testing programs demonstrate that Manh Choh ore is amenable to being recovered by gravity concentration, flotation, and cyanidation. Both MCS and MCN ores respond well to cyanide<br> leaching, gravity concentration, and flotation. |
|---|---|
| • | Cyanide leaching test work showed that highly reactive sulfide materials in the Manh Choh ores are one of the challenges for economical gold and silver recovery, although adding cement in grinding and leaching<br> with oxygen sparging helps reduce high reagent consumptions. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In 2014, a series of flotation tests were completed on 13 metallurgical composite samples from the Project. Test results show a direct correlation between the percentage of total sulfur content in the feeds<br> and the gold flotation recoveries and indicates most of the gold in the samples is associated with sulfide minerals. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In 2019, 22 rougher flotation tests and nine cleaner flotation tests were completed on Manh Choh ore samples, of which four rougher flotation tests and four cleaner flotation tests were assayed for gold<br> content. Test results show a direct correlation for both gold recovery and mass pull with the total sulfur content in the samples. The cleaner tests show that the gold grade in the flotation concentrate can be improved but at the expense of<br> the overall gold recovery. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Gold recoveries from 51 gravity concentration tests did not show clear correlation between gold head grades and gold recoveries. The average gold recovery from all tests was 25%, however, the recovery variance<br> standard deviation is as high as 20%. The average silver recovery from all tests was 10%. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In 2021, Extended Gravity Recovery Gold (EGRG) tests were completed on four master composites from Manh Choh. Test results show that the maximum gold recovery for Manh Choh ore samples varies between 16.3% and<br> 50.7%. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The results of the flowsheet options study confirmed that Manh Choh samples respond well to the gravity/flotation/cyanidation flowsheet, however, the overall reagent consumption was higher as compared to whole<br> ore leaching options. Based on the study of the MCS sulfide composite, the savings in NaCN and lime consumption made the whole ore leach the preferred option for the FS. |
| --- | --- |
PROCESS SELECTION AND OPERATIONS
| • | The existing Fort Knox processing facility will continue to operate with Fort Knox ore on a batch basis along with the Manh Choh ore. The equipment and process as is currently designed will not be modified when<br> processing ore from Fort Knox, however, additional equipment and piping modifications to some areas of the plant will be required for when processing Manh Choh ore. |
|---|---|
| • | The site conditions, operating conditions, and safety parameters are documented and provided for in the design basis. The environmental constraints have been identified and are considered in the design. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-5 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Any adjustments to the FS LOM plan or stockpiling strategy need to be carefully considered relative to the current stockpiling objective, i.e., prioritizing high-grade Fort Knox mill feed early in the life of<br> the Project. |
|---|---|
| • | The QP is of the opinion that the data derived from the Project’s metallurgical testing activities is adequate for the purposes of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation. |
| --- | --- |
1.1.4. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
| • | The Project is located on land owned and controlled by the Native Village of Tetlin (Tetlin), an indigenous Upper Tanana Athabascan Native Alaskan community. Tetlin owns both the surface and the subsurface<br> rights to their land. |
|---|---|
| • | In accordance with the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) is required to prepare either an EA or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project using<br> environmental baseline surveys and public comments. Based on a proactive effort to minimize Project-related impacts to wetlands, an EIS was not required and a wetlands permit was issued in September 2022 as part of an environmental<br> assessment (EA) of the Project. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Although not considered material to operating permits, in response to public concerns, the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities has funded an independent corridor analysis to review potential<br> impacts of an increase in traffic along the selected access route. The selected corridor analysis contractor will work with the newly established Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) that is being led by a consultant. The TAC will make<br> recommendations to the contractor and will help identify areas of concern. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Manh Choh ore has both potentially acid generating (PAG) and non-acid generating (NAG) components. Manh Choh ore will be processed at Fort Knox prior to the onset of PAG conditions. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Waste rock in the mine site area includes materials that are both PAG and metal leaching (ML). |
| --- | --- |
| o | Pit wall rock masses assessed as being ML or PAG will be covered during mining and reclamation activities. |
| --- | --- |
| o | During mining, surface water run-off and pit inflows will be collected and treated via a perimeter ditch collection system and in-pit dewatering infrastructure. |
| --- | --- |
| o | WRSAs are designed to minimize recharge and to isolate PAG and ML material, thereby minimizing any potential for external discharge from the waste rock over the long term. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Since 2012, surface water monitoring data has been collected from 19 sites around the Project area. Stream discharge is perennial in all catchments and most stream flows during the low-flow late fall and<br> winter months are assumed to represent baseflows due to the limited precipitation in the Project area during this period. The Project does not include disturbance of fish habitat. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Groundwater flow in the Project area is extremely low and localized due to dry conditions and limited recharge area. The small amount of recharge that does occur is related to spring snowmelt and the<br> relatively large seasonal fluctuation of groundwater levels is indicative of a low storage groundwater system. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-6 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Low rates of groundwater in-flow to the pits, low bedrock hydraulic conductivity, and a deep water table suggests that drawdown will be limited to the localized areas of the pit walls. |
|---|---|
| • | Manh Choh will be a low water-usage mine and droughts are not expected to have a significant impact on operations. If more frequent or intense rainstorms occur, the mine site is well situated on a hilltop high<br> above the flood plain, is designed to safely manage a 1 in 100-year storm event, and by designing to low probability events, infrastructure becomes inherently resilient to changes in precipitation over the relatively short mine life. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Water quality is generally good in headwater streams that drain the Project area. Baseline iron, arsenic, and manganese concentrations in Tors Creek exceed Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC)<br> guideline values due to the proximity of the mineralized orebody. Baseline sulfate, metals, and total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations are consistently higher in groundwater than surface water, particularly in the vicinity of the<br> orebody, however, concentrations are not consistently higher than ADEC guideline values. |
| --- | --- |
| • | None of the species recorded in the Project area are listed as Threatened or Endangered as specified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). There are however some fauna species and habitat worth<br> noting: |
| --- | --- |
| o | The Tetlin Hills are within the breeding range of the Olive-sided Flycatcher, which is designated by the USFWS as a species of conservation concern. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The Short-eared Owl was not observed but is also a species of conservation concern and may occur in the area. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Two Bald Eagle nests were found during the raptor nest survey, both greater than two miles from the Project. The USFWS advises that activities within two miles of Bald Eagle or Golden Eagle nests may require an<br> incidental take permit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Three common raven nests were found and these species are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). |
| --- | --- |
| o | The Project avoided important lowland moose habitat surrounding the Tok River. Individual animals from two caribou herds may be present seasonally. Caribou avoid areas of recent wildfire, which indicates they<br> may naturally avoid the Project. |
| --- | --- |
| • | No Project activities are located within protected areas. The closest protected area is the Tetlin National Wildlife refuge, which is approximately 20 to 30 miles to the east and southeast of the Project. |
| --- | --- |
| • | During Project baseline information collection activities, seven prehistoric archaeological sites were identified with five of these sites meeting federal archaeological site significance criteria making them<br> eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Based on the Project’s 2021 mine and infrastructure plans, the Project could impact one NRHP eligible site while the four other NRHP eligible sites should be avoidable<br> over the course of the LOM. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A Cultural Heritage Management Plan has been developed to address the mitigation plan for the NRHP eligible archaeological site that will be adversely affected by the Project and future discoveries of cultural<br> resources that may be discovered during the Project’s construction and operation. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-7 |
| --- | --- |

| • | The local area of Tok and surrounding areas, including Tetlin, have expressed support for the Project in numerous engagements, community meetings, public testimony, and in letter form. The local communities<br> expect that the Project will maximize opportunities for local employment and local business, operate in a safe and environmentally responsible manner, properly maintain the tribal road impacted by increased traffic, and respect the desire to<br> maintain cultural and subsistence ways of life. |
|---|---|
| • | Mine site reclamation and closure will be performed in accordance with the Manh Choh Project Reclamation and Closure Plan (RCP). The RCP was originally submitted for approval to Alaska Department of Natural<br> Resources (ADNR) and ADEC in December 2021 and was subsequently updated and re-submitted in January 2022. The RCP includes a closure cost estimate prepared using Alaska’s Standardized Reclamation Cost Estimator (SRCE) model, which was used<br> for calculating the financial assurance amount (bond) required by ADNR and ADEC. The SRCE model estimated a financial assurance requirement of approximately $63.5 million. Contango’s attributable ownership portion of the financial assurance<br> requirement is approximately $19.1 million, or as may be amended in the future. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In the QP’s opinion, the current plans related to environmental compliance, permitting, and local individuals or groups are reasonable for this level of study. |
| --- | --- |
1.2. RECOMMENDATIONS
1.2.1. GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
| 1. | Geologic exploration is on-going in the vicinity of the Manh Choh deposit and new data should be incorporated in the resource area when quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) and validation work is complete.<br> Several other holes were drilled in 2021 with results not available at the time of the model estimate. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Review second-laboratory and additional QA/QC results pending at the time of the model estimate. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Complete additional relogging validation of skarn intensity codes, redox codes, and structural measurements to add additional support to the estimate domains and methodology. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Complete additional density measurements in oxide waste areas where sample density could be increased. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Carry out additional metal estimates based on geochemical results to support other recovery, geochemical, and metallurgical considerations such as bismuth, lead, and zinc. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Complete additional sensitivity work related to simulated gold grade dilution. |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | Carry out a comparison of the grade capping on the 10 ft composites and the variable raw assays. |
| --- | --- |
| 8. | Use Disintegration Analysis for grade capping. |
| --- | --- |
| 9. | To avoid over-estimation of grades in certain areas, review and confirm declustered mean values. |
| --- | --- |
| 10. | Test the variable orientation and estimation in Leapfrog rather than moving the work to Vulcan software. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-8 |
| --- | --- |

| 11. | Tabulate and review capped vs. uncapped gold volumetric output (grade and ounces) from the block model by domain. |
|---|---|
| 12. | Prior to production, complete a reverse circulation (RC) grade control program to assess closer spaced grade variability. |
| --- | --- |
| 13. | The QP has reviewed the inputs for the reporting of Mineral Resources and is of the opinion that they are reasonable. The QP recommends that these inputs be reviewed during any future studies. |
| --- | --- |
1.2.2. MINING AND MINERAL RESERVES
| 1. | Complete additional geotechnical drilling, site investigation, and analysis to further optimize FS mine designs and the operational phase of the Project. Confirm the orientation of critical structures and<br> further inform potentially problematic domains, i.e., the North Domain in MCS and the Northeast Domain in MCN. |
|---|---|
| 2. | For optimal wall control, adopt pre-split blasting in all geotechnical domains. Trim blasting may be sufficient for the design sectors identified as having slope stability controlled by discrete faults or<br> fault/shear anisotropy. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Horizontal groundwater depressurization may be required in one geotechnical design sector, however, this should be confirmed during the Project’s operating phase. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | At MCS, straight north and east pit walls are designed to meet at a corner to avoid transitioning to a northeast wall orientation that would parallel problematic structures. It is critical that the orientations<br> of the straight north and east pit walls fall outside the range of influence of adversely orientated structures. The orientation of adverse structures at these pit wall locations should be confirmed by further drilling. |
| --- | --- |
1.2.3. MINERAL PROCESSING
| 1. | Review/evaluate the following potential improvements: |
|---|---|
| o | Install Auto Dilution for the thickener feed well to decrease the feed solids level prior to flocculation, improving particle setting rates. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Acid wash carbon prior to elution. This will improve elution efficiency by removing impurities such as copper, calcium, and magnesium which can impede both the elution step and the later adsorption of gold<br> onto the carbon after it has been returned to the Carbon-in-Pulp (CIP) circuit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Complete regeneration of all carbon prior to sending it back to the CIP circuit. This will restore the activity of spent activated carbon by removal of organic absorbates and lower the need to add additional<br> fresh carbon into the circuit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | To increase solution flow rates, replace piping to electrowinning circuit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | To reduce costs, complete a hydraulic study of slurry flow to evaluate the elimination of smaller inter-tank piping and instead use existing piping. |
| --- | --- |
| o | To reduce equipment scaling and improve heat exchange, complete regular cleaning of the heat exchanger and associated lines with sulfamic acid. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Evaluate in-line heating of eluate or heating of a portion of the eluate prior to stripping. Either improvement may eliminate the need for an extra heater to heat the elution columns and reduce elution times. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-9 |
| --- | --- |

1.2.4. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
| 1. | Continue adherence to the existing avoidance plan for all seven identified prehistoric sites to prevent any damage to their current condition or integrity until ACOE NRHP eligibility determinations are<br> formalized. |
|---|
1.3. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The economic analysis contained in this TRS is based on Contango’s 30% attributable ownership interest in Manh Choh Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves.
Economic assumptions and capital and operating costs in this analysis are based on the Manh Choh FS and FS economic update prepared by KGMA for the Peak Gold JV.
All costs are expressed without allowance for escalation or currency fluctuation in United States dollars (US$) with a H1 2022 cost basis and assume a West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil price of US$80 per barrel.
The economic analysis is presented in metric units of measure.
A summary of key inputs for the analysis is provided below.
1.3.1. PHYSICALS
| • | Physicals (mineable ore inventory): | Equal to Contango’s 30% attributable ownership interest in Manh Choh Probable Mineral Reserves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | Mine life: | 4.6 years (between years 2024 and 2028) | |
| • | Open pit operations | ||
| o | Open pit mine life: | 4.6 years | |
| o | Total ore tonnes mined: | 1.18 Mt at 7.9 g/t Au and 13.6 g/t Ag | |
| o | Waste tonnes: | 13.7 Mt | |
| o | Maximum mining rate: | 13,023 tpd (ore and waste) in year 2024 | |
| • | Processing of Mineral Reserves: | ||
| o | Total Ore Feed to Plant: | 1.18 Mt | |
| ◾Gold grade: | 7.9 g/t Au | ||
| ◾Silver grade: | 13.6 g/t Ag | ||
| ◾Maximum milling rate: | 13,200 tpd (ore will be processed on a batch <br><br> basis approximately four times a year) | ||
| o | Contained Metal | ||
| ◾Gold: | 299,143 oz | ||
| ◾Silver: | 515,571 oz | ||
| o | Average LOM Plant Recovery | ||
| ◾Gold | 90.3% | ||
| ◾Silver | 69.2% | ||
| o | Recovered Metal | ||
| ◾Gold: | 269,971 oz | ||
| ◾Silver: | 356,819 oz | ||
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-10 | ||
| --- | --- |

1.3.2. REVENUE
| • | Revenue stated in this section of the TRS only considers Contango’s 30% interest in Peak Gold JV. |
|---|---|
| • | Revenue is estimated over the LOM based on Contango’s corporate guidance prices from January 2023 on a real basis, with a flat long-term price of $1,600/oz Au and $22.00/oz Ag, respectively. The QP considers<br> these prices to be aligned with the current industry standards. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Payable metals are estimated at 99.9% for gold and 99.0% for silver. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Refinery charges are estimated to be as follows: |
| --- | --- |
| o | Doré transportation shipments: 15,000 oz per shipment. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Doré shipment costs: $10,000 per shipment. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Refining charges: $5.00/oz Au and $0.50/oz Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| • | After transportation and refining charges, LOM Net Smelter Returns (NSR) of approximately $437 million. |
| --- | --- |
1.3.3. CAPITAL COSTS
| • | A summary of the Project capital costs included in the economic analysis is provided in Table 1‑1. |
|---|
TABLE 1‑1 PROJECT CAPITAL COSTS
| Description | Units | Peak Gold JV<br><br> <br>(100% basis) | Contango^1^<br><br> <br>(30% portion) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Capital Costs for Project Construction | $ million | 189.4 | 56.8 |
| Capitalized Waste Development - Initial | $ million | 25.9 | 7.8 |
| Sustaining Capital Costs | $ million | 20.1 | 6.0 |
| Capitalized Waste Development - Sustaining | $ million | 55.8 | 16.7 |
| Salvage Value | $ million | 11.5 | 3.5 |
| Closure/Reclamation Capital | $ million | 105.6 | 31.7 |
Note:
- Excludes approximately $52 million in capital costs allocated to Fort Knox (captured in Toll Milling costs).
1.3.4. OPERATING COSTS
| • | Operating costs summarized below are LOM average values and are based on Contango’s 30% interest in the Peak Gold JV. |
|---|---|
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-11 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Open pit mining: |
|---|---|
| • | Capitalized waste development: |
| • | Ore haulage: |
| • | Processing (toll milling): |
| • | General and Administrative (G&A): |
| • | Total unit operating costs: |
| • | LOM total operating costs: |
| • | JV Management fee: In addition to site operating costs, there is a JV Management Fee charged by Peak Gold to the JV partners for running the site and operations. The fee is a<br> percentage charge of applicable Project costs as specified in the JV Agreement. The fee varies between a 3% charge during pre-production and a 2% charge during the operations period. The JV Management Fee for Contango’s 30% interest totals<br> approximately 5.4 million over the LOM. |
All values are in US Dollars.
1.3.5. TAXATION AND ROYALTIES
| • | The Project is subject to the following royalties: |
|---|---|
| o | Production royalty with the Native Village of Tetlin. When production is achieved, Peak Gold will begin paying the Tetlin Council a production royalty less all advanced royalty payments and the $450,000 “buy<br> up” payment. The current production royalty for gold, silver, platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, osmium, iridium, or any other precious metals or gems to the Native Village of Tetlin per Lease is: |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 3.0% NSR royalty on the first four years of full-scale production |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 4.0% NSR royalty on the fifth, sixth, and seventh years of full-scale production |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 5.0% NSR royalty on the eighth and subsequent years of full-scale production |
| --- | --- |
| • | Production royalty to Royal Gold, Inc., comprising: |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 3.0% NSR royalty on the Lease |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 28% NSR royalty on silver from the Lease |
| --- | --- |
| • | The mining industry pays an Alaska corporate income tax of up to 9.4% of income, which is the same for all corporations in the state. The mining industry also pays up to 7% of net profits as an additional<br> mining license tax, which applies to all mining operations, including royalty owners, regardless of size, land status, mineral ownership, or location. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The QP has relied on Grant Thornton LLP (Contango’s tax adviser) for the calculation of income and mining taxes applicable to the economic analysis. |
| --- | --- |
1.3.6. CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
The QP has reviewed the Manh Choh FS financial model (100% Peak Gold JV basis) prepared by KGMA (Kinross Model) and Contango’s own unlevered after-tax cash flow model for Contango’s 30% interest in the Project (Contango Model).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-12 |
|---|

Project economics in the Contango Model have been evaluated using the discounted cash flow method and considering annual processed tonnages and grade of ore. The QP reviewed the Contango Model and its assumptions for metal prices, metallurgical recoveries, operating costs, refining and transportation charges, and initial and sustaining capital expenditures and finds them to be reasonable.
Annual cash flow model results are presented in Section 19 of the TRS with no allowance for inflation.
At a 5% discount rate, results include a pre-tax and after-tax net present value (NPV) of approximately $49 million and $30 million, respectively. The QP is of the opinion that the application of a 5% discount rate for after-tax cash flow discounting of a precious metals Project in a politically stable region is reasonable and appropriate.
The economic analysis confirms that Contango’s 30% interest in Project Mineral Reserves is economically viable at the assumed metal prices.
Undiscounted pre-tax cash flows total approximately $71 million and undiscounted after-tax cash flows total approximately $46 million.
The Project’s internal rate of return (IRR) is defined as the discount rate that results in a Project NPV equal to zero. The Project’s pre-tax IRR is approximately 31% and the Project’s after-tax IRR is approximately 23%.
The World Gold Council Adjusted Operating Cost (AOC) on a Gold Equivalent (AuEq) basis is $899 per AuEq oz. The LOM sustaining capital cost is $218 per AuEq oz, for an All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) of $1,116 per AuEq oz. Contango’s portion of annual gold sales is approximately 58,402oz per year from 2024 to 2028.
Table 1‑2 presents a summary of the Contango Model cash flow results.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-13 |
|---|

TABLE 1‑2 SUMMARY OF CONTANGO MODEL CASH FLOW RESULTS
| Units | Total LOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Production | ||
| Mine Life | years | 4.6 |
| Pit Production | '000 tonnes | 1,181 |
| Au Grade | g/t | 7.9 |
| Ag Grade | g/t | 13.6 |
| Waste | '000 tonnes | 13,740 |
| Process Plant Feed | '000 tonnes | 1,181 |
| Au Grade | g/t | 7.9 |
| Ag Grade | g/t | 13.6 |
| Total Contained Production | ||
| Contained Au | ‘000 oz | 299 |
| Contained Ag | ‘000 oz | 515 |
| Average Metallurgical Recoveries | ||
| Au Recovery | % | 90.3% |
| Ag Recovery | % | 69.2% |
| Total Recovered Production | ||
| Recovered Au | ‘000 oz | 270 |
| Recovered Ag | ‘000 oz | 357 |
| Total Payable Production | ||
| Payable Au | ‘000 oz | 270 |
| Payable Ag | ‘000 oz | 353 |
| Metal Prices | ||
| Gold Price - average | $/oz | 1,600 |
| Silver Price - average | $/oz | 22.00 |
| Cash Flow | ||
| Gross Revenue | $ million | 439.3 |
| Transportation & Refining | $ million | (1.9) |
| Royalties | $ million | (28.5) |
| Operating Costs | ||
| Mining (Open Pit) | $ million | (89.1) |
| Capitalized Waste & Mine Development | $ million | 30.9 |
| Ore Hauling | $ million | (74.8) |
| Processing | $ million | (61.7) |
| G&A | $ million | (21.8) |
| Other Admin Expenses - Management Fee | $ million | (5.4) |
| EBITDA^1^ | $ million | 186.9 |
| Capital Costs | ||
| Initial Capital | $ million | (56.8) |
| Sustaining Capital | $ million | (6.0) |
| Capitalized Waste Dev. - Initial | $ million | (7.8) |
| Capitalized Waste Dev. - Sustaining | $ million | (16.7) |
| Salvage Value | $ million | 3.5 |
| Reclamation & Closure | $ million | (31.7) |
| Change in Working Capital | $ million | 0 |
| Pre-Tax Net Cash Flow | $ million | 71.3 |
| Federal & State Income Taxes | $ million | (25.1) |
| After-Tax Cash Flow | $ million | 46.2 |
| Project Economics | ||
| Pre-Tax | ||
| Pre-tax NPV at 5% | $ million | 49.0 |
| IRR | % | 30.6 |
| After-Tax | ||
| After-Tax NPV at 5% | $ million | 29.7 |
| IRR | % | 22.5 |
Note:
- Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-14 |
|---|

1.3.7. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Project risks can be identified in both economic and non-economic terms. Key economic risks were examined by running cash flow sensitivities on after-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate. The following parameters were examined:
| • | Gold head grade |
|---|---|
| • | Gold metallurgical recovery |
| --- | --- |
| • | Gold metal price |
| --- | --- |
| • | Operating costs |
| --- | --- |
| • | Capital costs (initial, sustaining, salvage, and closure) |
| --- | --- |
After-tax sensitivities have been calculated for -20% to +20% variations for gold grade, and gold price, -6% to +6% variations for gold recovery, and -5% to +15% for operating costs and capital costs to determine the most sensitive parameter of the Project. The sensitivities are presented in Table 1‑3.
TABLE 1‑3 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY
| Variance From Base Case | Head Grade<br><br> (g/t Au) | NPV at 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
|---|---|---|
| -20% | 6.30 | (24.1) |
| -10% | 7.09 | 5.2 |
| 0% | 7.88 | 29.7 |
| 10% | 8.67 | 54.0 |
| 20% | 9.46 | 76.9 |
| Variance From Base Case | Recovery<br><br> (% Au) | NPV at 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
| -6% | 85.3% | 16.2 |
| -3% | 87.6% | 22.6 |
| 0% | 90.3% | 29.7 |
| 3% | 92.8% | 36.5 |
| 6% | 95.1% | 42.9 |
| Variance From Base Case | Metal Prices<br><br> (US$/oz Au) | NPV at 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
| -20% | $1,280 | (24.4) |
| -10% | $1,440 | 5.1 |
| 0% | $1,600 | 29.7 |
| 10% | $1,760 | 54.1 |
| 20% | $1,920 | 77.1 |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-15 | |
| --- | --- |

| Variance From Base Case | Operating Costs<br><br> (US$/t) | NPV at 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
|---|---|---|
| -5% | $174 | 35.9 |
| -2,5% | $179 | 32.8 |
| 0% | $183 | 29.7 |
| 7.5% | $197 | 20.5 |
| 15% | $211 | 11.2 |
| Variance From Base Case | Capital Costs<br><br> (US$ 000) | NPV at 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
| -5% | $109,777 | 34.7 |
| -2,5% | $112,666 | 32.2 |
| 0% | $115,554 | 29.7 |
| 7.5% | $124,221 | 22.3 |
| 15% | $132,888 | 14.9 |
A comparison of results for the various sensitivity cases using after-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate are presented in Figure 1‑1.
FIGURE 1‑1 AFTER-TAX NPV AT 5% SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The Project is most sensitive to changes in metal prices, head grade and metallurgical recoveries, followed by operating costs and then capital costs.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-16 |
|---|

1.4. TECHNICAL SUMMARY
1.4.1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Project is located in the Tetlin Hills and Mentasta Mountains of eastern Interior Alaska, approximately 300 km (190 miles) SE of the city of Fairbanks (city and immediate area population approximately 100,000) and 20 km (12 miles) SE of Tok, Alaska
1.4.2. LAND TENURE
Peak Gold, a joint venture entity of KGMA (70%) and Core Alaska, LLC (30%), exclusively holds the rights to explore, mine, extract, and sell the metalliferous minerals derived from any mineral deposits of a mineral lease (the Lease) from the Native Village of Tetlin covering approximately 675,000 acres (the Leased Land). In addition, Peak Gold holds the mineral rights to 159 Alaska state mining claims (State Claims). These claims, totaling approximately 13,500 acres, are located adjacent to the Leased Land to the NW.
1.4.3. HISTORY
The first known arrival of a prospector to what is now the Manh Choh Project was in 1908 when James Northway brought a steam prospecting boiler to Tanacross and then set up a trading post at Tetlin Village the following spring. No other mention of Northway’s prospecting efforts is available. In the fall of 1913, prospector Andrew Taylor recovered about 200 ounces of gold from his discovery on the Chisana River bordering the eastern Project area. A small rush to the district occurred, however, it was short-lived as the district was soon found to contain few large or paying placer gold deposits.
Mineral exploration in the Manh Choh Project area came to a halt on June 10, 1930 when the approximately 750,000 acre Tetlin Indian Reserve (Tetlin Reserve) was established by the signing of Executive Order 5365 by President Herbert Hoover.
No other significant prospecting or geological work was reported from the Tetlin lands until the late 1960s. Approximately 40 geochemical samples were collected on the extreme southern edge of the Project during regional geologic mapping and geochemical sampling conducted by the US Geological Survey (USGS) in the late 1960s and early 1970s. This work revealed no significant gold or base metal anomalies, possibly due to the crude, high detection limit analytical methods used.
The Tetlin Reserve was revoked in 1971 upon passage of the landmark Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA). In the mid-1970s, Resources Associates of Alaska (RAA), a Fairbanks-based mineral consulting firm, was allowed to conduct a limited reconnaissance mineral survey of Tetlin Tribal lands. The results of this work are not available and attempts to locate data from this effort have not been successful. Limited information on this program indicated that reconnaissance-level geochemical sampling was conducted in 1976 and eight days of field work were completed in 1980. This work succeeded in discovering a tungsten skarn occurrence (exact location unknown) and two massive pyrite occurrences with nearby copper-lead-zinc exhalite horizons in the Meiklejohn Pass area.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-17 |
|---|

The Lease was acquired by Juneau Mining Company (Juneau), an affiliate of Contango, in mid-June 2008. In November 2010, Contango was formed and the Lease was contributed to it at that time. Mineral exploration work was conducted on the property in 2009 through 2013. In 2015, Royal Alaska, LLC, a subsidiary of Royal Gold, and Core Alaska, LLC, a subsidiary of Contango, entered into a joint venture with Contango for the Project, and the Lease and interests in the Project were contributed to Peak Gold JV. Peak Gold JV conducted further mineral exploration work on the Project from 2015 through 2018.
In September 2018, JDS Energy & Mining Inc. (JDS) prepared an internal Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) on the Project, which envisaged a conventional open pit truck and shovel operation with gold processing with cyanide leaching at a rate of 3,500 tonnes per day (tpd) over the potential Project life of eight years.
On September 30, 2020, Contango and Royal Gold each announced that a subsidiary of Kinross had acquired Royal Gold’s 40% interest and an additional 30% interest from Contango and was appointed Manager and Operator of Peak Gold JV, with the resulting ownership being KGMA at 70% and Contango at 30%.
1.4.4. GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION, AND DEPOSIT
The Project area is located in the eastern portion of the Yukon-Tanana Terrane (YTT) and is largely hosted within poly-metamorphic rocks. The majority of the bedrock in the deposit area consist of a Lower Paleozoic quartz-muscovite ± biotite schist (QMS) containing conformable layers of amphibolite schist. The deposit is hosted within calcareous metasedimentary rock that hosts silicate skarn alteration, as well as gold, silver, copper, and sulfide mineralization. The composition of the calcareous rocks vary from rare pure marble, through a gradational calc-schist package ranging from a calcareous arenite to a silty marble.
Weathering at Manh Choh is pervasive and largely controlled by the schist fabric, skarn alteration intensity, and intersecting faults. The MCN deposit has a deeper oxidation profile than the MCS deposit, characterized primarily by logged identification of more intense weathering minerals at depth and lower sulfur geochemical signature.
Both the MCS and MCN deposits have appreciable quantities of gold (Au), silver (Ag), and copper (Cu) associated with pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-arsenopyrite dominant stratabound replacement bodies interlayered with calcium-iron (Ca-Fe) amphibole, which replace the calcareous portions of the interlayered calcareous to argillaceous schist. The highest gold and silver grades are associated with the junctions of the discordant veining and the calcareous schist, with precious metal grade rapidly decreasing down dip, and gently tapering up dip.
1.4.5. EXPLORATION
Mineral exploration work was conducted on the Peak Gold property in 2009 through 2013 and 2015 through 2021.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-18 |
|---|

Gold mineralization was discovered at the property during stream sediment and pan concentrate sampling in 2009 and exploration efforts since then have included top of bedrock soil sampling, induced polarization and DC resistivity and magnetotelluric (Titan-24 DCIP&MT) ground geophysics, airborne magnetic and electromagnetic geophysical surveys, and approximately 85,509 m of diamond core drilling. These exploration efforts defined two high-grade gold skarn deposits, MCS and MCN, hosted in skarn-altered calcareous metasediments within an area of anomalous gold, copper, and pathfinder metals that measures at least 6 km N-S by 5 km E-W. Several promising near-resource exploration targets have been identified and have been explored during 2017 and 2018. A total of 521 diamond core holes comprising 98,843 m have been completed on the Project between 2011 and December 31, 2022, the effective date of the current Mineral Resource estimate.
1.4.6. MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
The Mineral Resources are contained within two deposits: MCS and MCN. Mineral Resources have been classified in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300. The Mineral Resources were developed using a computer-based block model based on drill hole assay information and geologic interpretation of the mineralization boundaries. Mineral Resources were estimated using the block model and open pit design software to establish the component of the deposit with reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The Mineral Resource block model and estimate were prepared by Kinross Technical Services (KTS) and reviewed by the Contango QP. The model was based on validated drilling data available through June 2021. Additional drilling has been completed on the property outside of the resource area.
Table 1‑4 summarizes the Mineral Resource estimate for the Project, effective December 31, 2022 (100% Peak Gold JV basis). Table 1‑5 summarizes Contango’s 30% attributable ownership of the Mineral Resource estimate.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-19 |
|---|

TABLE 1‑4 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – PEAK GOLD 100% ATTRIBUTABLE OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 846 | 2.4 | 65 | 9.3 | 252 |
| TOTAL | 846 | 2.4 | 65 | 9.3 | 252 |
| Inferred | 21 | 3.8 | 3 | 9.2 | 6 |
TABLE 1‑5 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – CONTANGO 30% ATTRIBUTABLE OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Au Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 254 | 2.4 | 20 | 9.3 | 76 |
| TOTAL | 254 | 2.4 | 20 | 9.3 | 76 |
| Inferred | 6 | 3.8 | 1 | 9.2 | 2 |
Notes for Tables 1-4 and 1-5:
| 1. | The definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300 were followed for Mineral Resources. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Mineral Resources are estimated using long term prices of US$1,600/oz Au price and US$22/oz. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Mineral Resources are reported using un-diluted Au and Ag grades. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Mineral Resources are reported within constraining pit shells. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | Mineral Resources are reported in dry metric tonnes. |
| --- | --- |
| 8. | Numbers may not add due to rounding. |
| --- | --- |
The QP reviewed consensus long-term (10 year) metal price forecasts for gold and silver and verified that the selected metal prices for estimating Mineral Resources are in line with independent forecasts from banks and other lenders.
The QP is of the opinion that with consideration of the recommendations summarized in Sections 1 and 23 of this report, any issues relating to all relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction can be resolved with further work.
The estimates of Mineral Resources may be materially affected if mining, metallurgical, or infrastructure factors change from those currently anticipated at the Manh Choh Project. Although the QP has a reasonable expectation that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated or Measured Resources with continued exploration, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources have significant geological uncertainty and it should not be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be converted to the Measured or Indicated categories.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-20 |
|---|

| 1.4.7. | MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE |
|---|
Table 1‑6 summarizes the Mineral Reserve estimate for the Project, effective December 31, 2022 (100% Peak Gold JV basis). Table 1‑7 summarizes Contango’s 30% attributable ownership of the Mineral Reserve estimate.
TABLE 1‑6 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – PEAK GOLD 100% ATTRIBUTABLE OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proven | - | - | - | - | - |
| Probable | 3,936 | 7.9 | 997 | 13.6 | 1,719 |
| TOTAL | 3,936 | 7.9 | 997 | 13.6 | 1,719 |
TABLE 1‑7 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – CONTANGO 30% ATTRIBUTABLE OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proven | - | - | - | - | - |
| Probable | 1,181 | 7.9 | 299 | 13.6 | 516 |
| TOTAL | 1,181 | 7.9 | 299 | 13.6 | 516 |
Notes for Tables 1-6 and 1-7:
| 1. | The definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300 were followed for Mineral Resources. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Mineral Reserves were estimated at long term prices of $1,300/oz Au and $17/oz Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Mineral Reserves are reported at an economic cut-off that varies by process cost and metallurgical recovery, approximately equivalent to 2.50 g/t Au. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Mineral Reserve estimates incorporate dilution built in during the re-blocking process and assume 100% mining recovery. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Mineral Reserves are reported in dry metric tonnes. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Numbers may not add due to rounding. |
| --- | --- |
The QP is not aware of any risk factors associated with, or changes to, any aspects of the modifying factors such as mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the Mineral Reserve estimate.
The smallest mining unit (SMU) is deemed to be 20 ft x 20 ft x 10 ft (height). The primary ore loading fleet will therefore be tailored to maintain selectivity at this scale, with excavator buckets not to exceed 7 ft to 8 ft widths, and flitch mining in 10 ft flitches (20 ft blasts) to occur in ore zones. Dilution was estimated using a 2 ft thick block skin on every other ore contact, to simulate dilution incurred along the floor of each 10 ft flitch.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-21 |
|---|

| 1.4.8. | MINING |
|---|
The Project mine design includes two open pits, Manh Choh North and Manh Choh South (MCN and MCS), that will be mined with conventional open pit mining equipment. The Project includes waste rock storage areas (WRSA), ore stockpile and load-out facilities, and related surface infrastructure and support buildings.
Pre-production mining will commence in Q3 2023, followed by first ore delivered to the Fort Knox processing facility in January 2024. The Project’s ex-pit mining rate is between 15 Mtpa and 17 Mtpa over the life of mine (LOM) with peak ex-pit mining rates expected in 2024 when ore and waste hauls are shortest and MCN and MCS pits are being mined concurrently. Ore and waste extraction is completed first in MCN, approximately two years into Project mine life, and provides important and time-sensitive in-pit waste storage capacity. Ex-pit ore and waste mining and in-pit waste backfilling are expected to occur over a four-year period, followed by approximately six months of waste re-handling and in-pit backfilling in support of reclamation and closure activities.
The LOM plan includes ore haulage by the mining fleet to an ore load-out facility proximal to the MCN and MCS pits. At the load-out facility, ore will be transferred into highway trucks by a third-party contractor for transport to the Fort Knox site where it will be processed at the existing CIP mill.
Mining activities at the Project are proposed to commence in July 2023 with the start of the pre-production period. The pre-production period includes mining MCS Phase 1 (MCS P1) to build high-grade ore stockpiles ahead of ore transport ramp-up, and mining MCS Phase 2 (MCS P2) and MCN to expedite sinking of the large pits and to source clean waster rock for construction priorities (mining roads, etc.). The pre-production period lasts until first transport of ore to Fort Knox, in January 2024, at which time the production period begins. MCN mining is completed in August 2025 and corresponding in-pit backfill capacity becomes available for receiving waste from mining the remainder of MCS P2. Mining of MCS P2 is on the critical path to completion of the overall mining sequence, with expected completion in July 2027, four years after mining begins.
| 1.4.9. | MINERAL PROCESSING |
|---|
Three historical metallurgical testing programs and one recent metallurgical test program were performed on the Project ore samples, which included.
| • | Gravity concentration and flotation tests in 2014 by SGS, in Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, |
|---|---|
| • | Gravity concentration, flotation, and cyanide leaching tests in 2014 by Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA), Reno, Nevada, USA, |
| --- | --- |
| • | Flotation, magnetic separation, gravity concentration, cyanide leaching, and comminution tests from 2017 to 2019 by McClelland Laboratories, Inc. (MLI), in Sparks,<br> Nevada, USA. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Flotation, gravity concentration, cyanide leaching, and comminution tests in 2021 by MLI,<br> 2021. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-22 |
| --- | --- |

Results of previous metallurgical testing programs show that Manh Choh ore is amenable to being recovered by gravity concentration, flotation, and cyanidation.
Both MCS and MCN ores respond well to cyanide leaching, gravity concentration, and flotation.
Starting in the second half of 2024 to the beginning of 2028, a total of 4.3 million st of Manh Choh ore is expected to be transported to the Fort Knox mineral processing facility. Approximately 900 koz of gold (90.3% LOM recovery) will be produced. Gold is recovered by gravity concentration and CIP process. During the third quarter of the Manh Choh ore processing campaign in 2024, the gold and silver recoveries are reduced by 5% to account for processing ramp-up.
The existing Fort Knox processing facility will be modified to process Manh Choh ore on a campaign or batch basis. ROM ore will be trucked from Manh Choh to Fort Knox and side dumped onto a coarse ore stockpile. From the coarse ore stockpile, ore will be transported to the Gyratory crusher. Crushed ore will be drawn from the crushed ore stockpile using variable speed apron feeders which will feed the semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill feed conveyor. The SAG mill product will discharge onto a wet vibrating screen where the undersize will flow into a common mill sump along with the ball mill product and the oversize, to the pebble crusher to further reduce the critical size material which will then be recycled back to the feed end of the SAG mill. From the common mill sump, SAG mill discharge screen undersize and ball mill discharge will be pumped to a set of hydrocyclones. The cyclone overflow will flow to trash screens to remove grit and wood chips. Screen underflow will report to the pre-leach thickener where flocculant is added to aid in the settling process. Thickener underflow will be pumped to the leach circuit, consisting of six CIP tanks.
Due to its higher gold content, the ore will require additional carbon to maintain low solution losses. Total carbon transfer from CIP tanks No.1 and No. 2 will total approximately 38 stpd. The slurry and carbon from CIP tanks No.1 and 2 will be sent to two new loaded carbon dewatering screens to wash the pulp off the carbon. A loaded carbon holding tank will be added to have a capacity to hold 12 st of carbon. When the elution columns are ready to be filled, the loaded carbon will be transferred to the elution columns and the stripping cycle will begin. Currently, the carbon stripping circuit at Fort Knox is comprised of two stripping vessels, of which only one operates at any given time, processing the loaded carbon from the CIP. When Manh Choh ore is being processed, to avoid excess accumulation of carbon, two stripping vessels will be used simultaneously.
Cyanide tailings generated from the Manh Choh ore will report to the cyanide destruction circuit, which will consist of two tanks. Discharge from the last CIP tank will flow by gravity into the tailings thickener feed box along with the addition of process water from the reclaim water pond to reduce the feed density to the thickener from the CIP tank from 55% wt solids to a lower density. The thickener underflow will then be pumped to the carbon safety screen distributor box which feeds the carbon safety screens. To improve water recovery, overflow clarity and underflow densities, a new feedwell will be installed. It was also recommended to install an auto dilution system to ensure proper mixing of the flocculent with the slurry.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-23 |
|---|

| 1.4.10. | INFRASTRUCTURE |
|---|
To support Project activities at the Manh Choh mine site, the following new or upgraded infrastructure is planned:
| • | Construction of a new “Twin Road” parallel to the existing Tetlin Village Access (TVA) Road to facilitate ore haulage with highway trucks. |
|---|---|
| • | A new Manh Choh Mine Access (MCMA) Road from the TVA Road to the mine site, including several material laydown areas along the route. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A new highway truck ore load-out facility, including infrastructure for maintenance, truck scale operations, administrative functions, and associated waste and water<br> management facilities. |
| --- | --- |
| • | North Waste Rock Storage Facility (WRSF), North Pit WRSF, Main WRSF, Overburden and Wet Stockpiles, and Marginal Low-Grade Ore (LGO) Stockpile Pad. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A new Mine Infrastructure Site, including mine offices, mine maintenance facilities, warehousing facilities, a water treatment plant, and emergency response<br> infrastructure. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Facilities for re-fueling, explosives storage and handling, and sewerage. |
| --- | --- |
| • | New laydown areas, upgraded off-site accommodation facilities, and general buildings. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Primary mine site power supply consisting of enclosed diesel generators and switchgear with three-phase power distribution via on-surface and underground cable runs. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Process controls for water and wastewater management, mine dewatering pumps, building systems, and equipment washdown. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Communications infrastructure for facilities, administration, mine operations and mine maintenance activities, and environmental monitoring. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Surface water diversion channels and water treatment and retention facilities. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Two additional water supply wells will be installed to ensure sufficient water is available to manage dust. The first additional well will be in the vicinity of the pits,<br> with the second to be drilled close to the access road near the Alaska Highway. Potable drinking water will be available at fill stations at the upgraded accommodations complex in Tok and will be delivered from the complex to the mine site<br> offices. |
| --- | --- |
To support Project activities at Fort Knox, the following new or upgraded infrastructure is planned:
| • | Process plant modifications to process Manh Choh ore on a campaign or batch basis. |
|---|---|
| • | Minor modifications to the Fort Knox Access Road. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A new Manh Choh coarse ore stockpile, including a new surface water collection and management facility and associated pipelines. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Tailings from Manh Choh ore will be deposited in the mined-out Fort Knox open pit. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-24 |
| --- | --- |

| 1.4.11. | ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|---|
Policies, procedures, and requirements for environmental protection and compliance with regulatory requirements at Manh Choh will be developed once regulatory agency permits, plans, and agreements are approved and issued. These agency documents will provide specific regulatory requirements that will be used for development of Manh Choh’s policies and procedures. These policies and procedures will be incorporated into the Manh Choh Environmental Management Plan (EMP), which will apply to all aspects of Manh Choh operations, including, but not limited to, mine construction and operations, crushing, maintenance, warehousing, and exploration activities, as well as ancillary facilities (e.g., ore transfer, water management, powder magazine, reverse osmosis water treatment system, etc.). The EMP will describe environmental tasks; list environmental permits, licenses, and authorizations and corresponding obligations; contain inspection and monitoring routines and checklists; and include reporting and environmental management procedures. The EMP is aligned with the Peak Gold Safety and Sustainability Policy, the Kinross Corporate Safety and Sustainability Policy, as well as the Kinross Corporate Responsibility Management System (CRMS) Environmental Management System standards.
Project development requires the US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) to prepare either an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) using environmental baseline surveys and public comments. The ACOE’s EA is required by the agency because of the U.S. CWA §404 Wetlands Fill permitting process. In September 2022, the Project received a Wetlands Fill Permit under Clean Water Act (CWA) §404 as part of an EA.
Based on a proactive effort to minimize Project-related impacts to wetlands, it appears that the ACOE will complete an EA based on only 5.2 acres of wetland disturbance and ACOE’s public notice for the CWA §404 Wetlands Fill Permit Application on January 13, 2022. Provided that the ACOE follows through with completion of an EA, the permitting timeframe is estimated to take no more than six to nine months to complete.
All other key permit applications and plans for the Project have been submitted to the respective regulatory agencies for approval.
Interior Alaska continues to be supportive of mining and is cognizant of its mining-rich history. The local area of Tok and surrounding areas, including the Native Village of Tetlin, have expressed support for the Project in numerous engagements, community meetings, public testimony, and in letter form. The local communities see great value in the Project to include hope and opportunities that could be generationally impactful. They also expect that the Project will maximize opportunities for local employment and local business, operate in a safe and environmentally responsible manner, properly maintain the tribal road impacted by increased traffic, and respect the desire to maintain cultural and subsistence ways of life.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-25 |
|---|

The current ore transport plan anticipates that the ore trucks will depart from the Manh Choh mine site and will end at the Fort Knox mill for processing, traveling approximately 240 miles on 90% public roadways along the Alaska, Richardson, and Steese highways. The route will pass through the communities of Tok, Delta Junction, Salcha, North Pole, Fairbanks, and Fox. Two smaller lakeside communities that the corridor will pass by, but not through, are Harding Lake and Birch Lake. Public meetings have been held in communities along the route, either virtually or in-person, to provide information and listen to community concerns.
A community engagement plan has been in place since 2020 which details an estimated consultation schedule for all key stakeholders, in alignment with key internal targets such as contractor/employee trainings, baseline studies, newsletters, etc. The plan outlines meeting frequency, purpose, site lead, and resources needed, both internal and external. Documentation of each of these engagements is maintained on the Manh Choh internal SharePoint site, to include (when available) meeting minutes, sign-in sheets, announcements, and photographs.
Mine site reclamation and closure will be performed in accordance with the Manh Choh Project RCP. The RCP was originally submitted for approval to ADNR and ADEC in December 2021 and was subsequently updated and re-submitted in January 2022. The RCP includes a closure cost estimate prepared using the SRCE model, which was used for calculating the financial assurance amount (bond) required by ADNR and ADEC. The SRCE model estimated a financial assurance requirement of approximately $63.5 million. Contango’s attributable ownership portion of the financial assurance requirement is approximately $19.1 million, or as may be amended in the future.
The public comment period for the revised (January 2022) RCP ended March 13, 2023 and approval of the revised RCP is expected approximately May 2023.
| 1.4.12. | CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS |
|---|
The pre-production capital cost for the Project is approximately $189 million (Peak Gold JV 100% attributable basis). An allowance of US$52 million has been estimated for modifications needed to the Fort Knox processing facility to treat ore from the Manh Choh mine site. The capital costs for Fort Knox mill modifications are not directly attributable to the Project or the Peak Gold JV and instead will be recovered by Kinross through a toll processing charge.
Table 1‑8 provides a summary of the Project capital cost estimate (100% Peak Gold JV basis).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-26 |
|---|

TABLE 1‑8 PROJECT CAPITAL COST SUMMARY
| WBS | Description | Manh Choh<br><br> <br>(100%) Total<br><br> <br>Cost<br><br> <br>($M) | Fort Knox Mill<br><br> <br>Mods (100%)<br><br> <br>Total Cost<br><br> <br>($M) | Manh Choh +<br><br> <br>Fort Knox Mill Mods<br><br> <br>(100%) Total Cost<br><br> <br>($M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | General Contracts | - | $2.7 | $2.7 |
| 20 | Mining & Mobile Equipment | $4.7 | $2.5 | $7.2 |
| 30 | Site Development | $77.4 | $3.2 | $80.6 |
| 40 | Process Facilities | - | $22.2 | $22.2 |
| 50 | Tailings | - | $2.6 | $2.6 |
| 80 | Indirect Costs | $18.8 | $12.0 | $30.8 |
| 89 | Contingency & Escalation | $14.0 | $6.4 | $20.4 |
| Initial Capital | $114.9 | $51.6 | $166.5 | |
| Pre-Production G&A | $12.9 | |||
| Admin Fee | $6.4 | |||
| Highway Ore Transport | $33.6 | |||
| Pre-Production Capitalized Stripping | $21.4 | |||
| Total Capital Costs | $240.8 |
Table 1‑9 shows the operating costs by area. The operating costs are presented on a 100% JV basis.
TABLE 1‑9 OPERATING COST ESTIMATE
| Operating Cost | Unit | LOM Average Unit Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Mining | $/t mined^1^ | 5.97 |
| Processing | $/t ore | 52.26 |
| G&A | $/t ore | 18.47 |
| Ore Haul^2^ | $/t ore | 63.39 |
^1^Includes capitalized stripping and WTI Oil Adjustment.
^2^Includes initial cost of trucks amortized across mine life and includes fuel cost based on $3.00/gal.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 1-27 |
|---|

| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
Sims Resources LLC (SR) was retained by Contango ORE, Inc. (Contango) to prepare a Technical Report Summary (TRS) on the Manh Choh Project (the Project or Manh Choh), located near Tok, Alaska, U.S.A. The purpose of this TRS is to summarize the results of a Feasibility Study (FS) prepared by KGMA (Kinross), Contango’s joint venture partner for the Project. This Technical Report Summary (TRS) conforms to United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Modernized Property Disclosure Requirements for Mining Registrants as described in Subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K, Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (S-K 1300) and Item 601(b)(96) Technical Report Summary.
Contango is a New York Stock Exchange - American NYSE-A) company that engages in exploration for gold and associated minerals in Alaska. The Company holds a 30% interest in Peak Gold, LLC (Peak Gold JV or Peak Gold) with the remaining 70% owned by KGMA, operator and manager of the Peak Gold JV. Peak Gold leases approximately 675,000 acres of fee simple land from the Tetlin Tribe and controls an additional approximately 13,000 acres of State mining claims open to exploration and development. Contango also owns a 100% interest in approximately 167,000 acres of State of Alaska mining claims through Contango Mineral Alaska, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary, which gives Contango the exclusive right to explore and develop minerals on these lands.
The Project has been actively explored since 2009 when gold mineralization was discovered in a favourable geological environment for mid-Cretaceous intrusive-related gold deposits of the Tintana Gold Belt as well as late Cretaceous to mid Tertiary porphyry copper-molybdenum gold and related gold skarn deposits. Two distal gold skarn deposits have been delineated, Manh Choh North (MCN) and Manh Choh South (MCS) and there is excellent potential to discover additional deposits on the Project.
The Project was previously named “Peak Gold” but was renamed “Manh Choh” in March 2021 after close consultation with the local Upper Tanana Athabascan Village of Tetlin and the landowner. The Project contains a relatively high-grade gold deposit. The FS contemplates 4.6 years of open pit production at a life-of-mine (LOM) average mining rate of 10.8 million tonnes per year (tpa). Ore from the Project will be processed at Kinross’ Fort Knox processing facilities, located approximately 400 km by paved highway northwest of the Project.
All economic values presented in this TRS are in United States dollars (US$).
Unless stated otherwise, all tonnages are dry metric tonnes and all ounces are troy ounces.
This TRS updates the previously filed Technical Report Summary on the Manh Choh Project, Alaska, USA by Sims Resources LLC and dated April 8, 2021.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 2-1 |
|---|

| 2.1. | SITE VISITS |
|---|
The Qualified Person (QP) for this Technical Report is:
| • | John Sims, AIPG Certified Professional Geologist, President of Sims Resources LLC (SR) |
|---|
The QP is of the opinion that with consideration of the recommendations summarized in Sections 1 and 23 of this report, any issues relating to all relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction can be resolved with further work.
Mr. Sims visited the site in August of 2021 and inspected core and surface outcrops, drill platforms, and sample cutting and logging areas. Further, the QP discussed the details of geology and mineralization with Project staff.
| 2.2. | SOURCES OF INFORMATION |
|---|
When the Manh Choh property was acquired by KGMA, the QP was Senior Vice President, Mineral Resources and Brownfields Exploration at Kinross. Post-acquisition, the QP became an independent consultant to Kinross. The documentation reviewed, and other sources of information, are listed at the end of this report in Section 24 References.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 2-2 |
|---|

2.3. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
Both metric and imperial units of measurement are used in this report. The Mineral Resource estimate in Section 11 is reported in metric units, while historic information is reported in both metric and imperial units. All currency in this report is US dollars (US$) unless otherwise noted.
| a | annum | L/s | litres per second |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ampere | μ | micron |
| bbl | barrels | m | metre |
| BTU | British thermal units | M | mega (million); molar |
| °C | degree Celsius | m^2^ | square metre |
| C$ | Canadian dollars | m^3^ | cubic metre |
| cal | calorie | Ma | million years |
| cfm | cubic feet per minute | MASL | metres above sea level |
| cm | centimetre | mg | microgram |
| cm^2^ | square centimetre | m^3^/h | cubic metres per hour |
| d | day | mi | mile |
| dia | diameter | min | minute |
| dmt | dry metric tonne | mm | micrometre |
| dwt | dead-weight ton | mm | millimetre |
| E | east | mph | miles per hour |
| °F | degree Fahrenheit | MVA | megavolt-amperes |
| FASL | feet above sea level | MW | megawatt |
| ft | foot | MWh | megawatt-hour |
| ft^2^ | square foot | N | north |
| ft^3^ | cubic foot | NE | northeast |
| ft/s | foot per second | NW | northwest |
| g | gram | oz | Troy ounce (31.1035g) |
| G | giga (billion) | oz/st | ounce per short ton |
| Gal | Imperial gallon | ppb | part per billion |
| g/L | gram per litre | ppm | part per million |
| Gpm | Imperial gallons per minute | psia | pound per square inch absolute |
| g/t | gram per tonne | psf | per square foot |
| ha | hectare | psig | pound per square inch gauge |
| hp | horsepower | RL | relative elevation |
| hr | hour | s | second |
| Hz | hertz | S | south |
| in. | inch | SE | southeast |
| in^2^ | square inch | SW | southwest |
| J | joule | st | United States short ton |
| k | kilo (thousand) | stpa | United States short ton per year |
| kcal | kilocalorie | stpd | United States short ton per day |
| kg | kilogram | t | metric tonne |
| km | kilometre | tpa | metric tonne per year |
| km^2^ | square kilometre | tpd | metric tonne per day |
| km/h | kilometre per hour | US$ | United States dollar |
| koz | thousand ounces | USg | United States gallon |
| kPa | kilopascal | USgpm | US gallon per minute |
| kt | thousand tonnes | V | volt |
| kVA | kilovolt-amperes | W | west |
| kW | kilowatt | wmt | wet metric tonne |
| kWh | kilowatt-hour | wt% | weight percent |
| L | litre | yd^3^ | cubic yard |
| lb | pound | yr | year |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 2-3 | ||
| --- | --- |

Acronyms used in this TRS are listed below.
| Acronym | Description |
|---|---|
| AAS | Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy |
| ABA | Acid Base Accounting |
| ACI | American Concrete Institute |
| ACOE | U.S. Army Corps of Engineers |
| ADEC | Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation |
| ADNR | Alaska Department of Natural Resources |
| ADOT | Alaska Department of Transportation |
| ANCSA | Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act |
| ANSI | American National Standards Institute |
| AGMA | American Gear Manufacturers Association |
| AISC | American Institute of Steel Construction |
| AISI | American Iron and Steel Institute |
| AP&T | Alaska Power and Telephone |
| APDES | Alaska Pollutant Discharge Elimination System |
| API | American Petroleum Institute |
| ASCE | American Society of Civil Engineers |
| ASHRAE | American Society of Heating, Ventilation, and Refrigeration Engineers |
| ASME | American Society of Mechanical Engineers |
| ASTM | American Society for Testing and Materials |
| AWWA | American Water Works Association |
| BFA | Bench Face Angle |
| BICSI | Building Industry Consulting Service International |
| BLM | Bureau of Land Management |
| BRT | Bottle Roll Test |
| BTS | Brazilian Tensile Strength |
| CAP | Council of Alaska Producers |
| CEMA | Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association |
| CF | Cash Flow |
| CIM | Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum |
| CIP | Carbon-in-Pulp |
| CMAA | Crane Manufacturers Association of America |
| CV | Coefficient of Variation |
| DCS | Distributed Control System |
| DEF | Diesel Exhaust Fluid |
| EA | Environmental Assessment |
| EDA | Exploratory Data Analysis |
| EDS | Energy Dispersive Spectrometers |
| EHS | Environment, Health and Safety |
| EID | Environmental Information Document |
| EIS | Environmental Impact Statement |
| EMP | Environmental Management Plan |
| EMS | Environmental Management System |
| ERT | Emergency Response Ream |
| FCC | Federal Communications Commission |
| FGMI | Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc. |
| FOS | Factor of Safety |
| FEL | Front End Loader |
| FS | Feasibility Study |
| G&A | General and Administration |
| GCO | Grade Control Optimization |
| GHG | Greenhouse Gas |
| HDPE | High Density Polyethylene |
| IBC | International Building Code |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 2-4 |
| --- | --- |

| Acronym | Description |
|---|---|
| ICP-AES | Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrography |
| IFC | International Fire Code |
| IMC | International Mechanical Code |
| ISO | International Organization for Standardization |
| ID | Inverse Distance |
| IEEE | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
| IES | Illuminating Engineering Society |
| IP | Induced Polarization |
| ISO | International Organization for Standardization |
| JIC | Joint Industrial council |
| KCA | Kappes, Cassiday & Associates |
| KNA | Kriging Neighborhood Analysis |
| KTS | Kinross Technical Services |
| LBMA | London Bullion Market Association |
| LiDAR | Light Detection and Ranging |
| LOM | Life of Mine |
| LUC | Localized Uniform Conditioning |
| MCN | Manh Choh North |
| MCS | Manh Choh South |
| MCW | Manh Choh West |
| ML | Metal Leaching |
| MLI | McClelland Laboratories, Inc. |
| MSEP | MineSight Economic Planner |
| MSGP | Multi-Sector General Permit |
| MSHA | Mine Safety and Health Administration |
| MTO | Material Take Offs |
| NACE | National Association of Corrosion Engineers |
| NAG | Non-Acid Generating |
| NE | Northeast |
| NEC | National Electrical Code |
| NECA | National Electrical Contractors Association |
| NEMA | National Electrical Manufacturers Association |
| NEPA | U.S. National Environmental Policy Act |
| NESC | National Electrical Safety Code |
| NFPA | National Fire Protection Association |
| NHD | National Hydrography Dataset |
| NN | Nearest Neighbor |
| NPR | Neutralization Potential Ratio |
| NRHP | National Register of Historic Places |
| NRTL | Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory |
| NW | Northwest |
| OK | Ordinary Kriging |
| OSA | Overall Slope Angle |
| OSHA | Occupational Safety and Health Standards |
| P&ID | Piping and Instrumentation Diagram |
| PAG | Potentially Acid Generating |
| PAX | Potassium Amyl Xanthate |
| PEA | Preliminary Economic Assessment |
| PPI | Plastics Pipe Institute |
| PFS | Pre-Feasibility Study |
| QA/QC | Quality Assurance and Quality Control |
| QMS | Quartz-Muscovite ± Biotite Schist |
| QP | Qualified Person |
| RMR | Rock Mass Rating |
| RQD | Rock Quality Designation |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 2-5 |
| --- | --- |

| Acronym | Description |
|---|---|
| 'RSA | Reimbursable Service Agreement |
| SDS | Safety Data Sheet |
| SE | Southeast |
| SEM | Scanning Electron Microscopy |
| SHPO | State Historic Preservation Office |
| SMBS | Sodium Metabisulfite |
| SMU | Smallest Mining Unit |
| SPCC | Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure |
| SRCE | Standardized Reclamation Cost Estimator |
| SW | Southwest |
| SWPPP | Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan |
| TAC | Transportation Advisory Committee |
| TCS | Triaxial Compressive Strength |
| TDS | Total Dissolved Solids |
| TNC | Tetlin Native Corporation |
| TIA | Telecommunications Industry Association |
| TMF | Tailings Management Facility |
| UCS | Unconfined Compressive Strength |
| UL | Underwriters Laboratory |
| UPC | Uniform Plumbing Code |
| USFWS | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |
| UTM | Universal Transverse Mercator |
| WGC | World Gold Council |
| WRMP | Waste Rock Management Plan |
| WRSA | Waste Rock Storage Facility |
| XRD | X-ray Diffraction |
| YTT | Yukon-Tanana Terrane |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 2-6 |
| --- | --- |

| 3. | PROPERTY DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| 3.1. | LOCATION |
| --- | --- |
The Project is located in the Tetlin Hills and Mentasta Mountains of eastern Interior Alaska, approximately 300 km (190 miles) SE of the city of Fairbanks (city and immediate area population approximately 100,000) and 20 km (12 miles) SE of Tok, Alaska (population 1,258). The Project is located at approximately 63°N latitude and 143°E longitude (Figure 3‑1). UTM coordinates for the Project are 404688E, 7007487N, and 900 MASL elevation. The Project covers an area measuring approximately 80 km (50 miles) N-S by 60 km (37 miles) E-W in eastern Interior Alaska.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 3-1 |
|---|

FIGURE 3‑1 LOCATION MAP

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 3-2 |
|---|

| 3.2. | LAND TENURE |
|---|
Peak Gold, a joint venture entity of a KGMA and Core Alaska, LLC, exclusively holds the rights to explore, mine, extract, and sell the metalliferous minerals derived from any mineral deposits of a mineral lease (the Lease) from the Native Village of Tetlin covering approximately 675,000 acres (the Leased Land). In addition, Peak Gold holds the minerals rights to 159 Alaska state mining claims (State Claims). These claims, totaling approximately 13,500 acres, are located adjacent to the Leased Land to the NW. Table 3‑1 summarizes the Project mineral rights holdings and Figure 3‑2 is a map showing the location of the Alaska State Claims and Leased Land. The Manh Choh North (MCS) and Manh Choh South (MCN) deposits are located entirely within the Leased Land. The State Claims are in good standing. Peak Gold is owner, lessee, or optionee of adequate surface rights to allow for stockpiling, processing, and tailings storage within the Project area.
The approximately 750,000-acre Tetlin Indian Reserve (the Reserve) was established in 1930. An airstrip was constructed in 1946, and an all-weather road linking the Tetlin Village with the Alaska Highway was constructed in the 1990s. When the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) was passed in 1971, the “Reserve” status was revoked and the Tetlin Native Corporation (TNC) was granted fee simple surface and subsurface title to approximately 743,000 acres of land in the former Reserve. TNC later transferred all lands south of the midline of the Tanana River, approximately 675,000 acres, to the Tetlin Village.
TABLE 3‑1 MINERAL RIGHTS AND PROPERTIES SUMMARY
| Property | Owner | Commodities | Claims | Acres | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tok-Eagle | Contango Minerals Alaska, LLC | Gold, Copper | 159 | 13,500 | Optioned Alaska State Mining Claims |
| Tetlin-Village | Peak Gold, LLC | Gold, Copper | 0 | 675,000 | Leased Private, Fee-Simple |
| TOTALS: | 159 | 688,500 | |||
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 3-3 | ||||
| --- | --- |

FIGURE 3‑2 LOCATION OF STATE CLAIMS AND TETLIN LEASED LANDS

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 3-4 |
|---|

| 3.2.1. | STATE CLAIMS |
|---|
Exploration by Contango Minerals Alaska, LLC has been conducted on the State Claims adjacent to and near the Leased Land. All of the optioned State Claims are located in the Copper River meridian. Peak Gold, LLC has exercised its option on the State Claims and now has the right of possession and right to develop and extract a discovered, valuable, mineral deposit.
Peak Gold owns approximately 13,500 acres of State of Alaska mining claims immediately north and east of the Tetlin leased lands (see Figure 3‑2). The State Claims give Peak Gold the exclusive rights to explore and develop minerals subject to specific permitting requirements. The State Claims do not provide Peak Gold with exclusive surface rights or the right to receive fee simple Patent ownership rights to State Claims. Surface Activities on the State Claims are permitted through the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. Peak Gold’s permits are addressed in Section 17.
The State Claims can be maintained indefinitely by satisfying (i) annual claim rental fee obligations and (ii) annual minimum work expenditure requirements. The annual claim rental fees are to be paid between September 1 and November 30 in advance for the following claim year. The amount of the annual claim rental fees starts at $140 for each 160 acre claim and $35 for each 40 acre claim and increases based on tenure. The annual minimum work expenditure requirements can be met by actual labor or development work within the annual labor year, carried forward credits from the previous four years or payment in lieu of labor. Annual work must be completed between noon, September 1 of the current year and noon, September 1 of the following year and evidence of such work must be recorded in the appropriate recording district between September 1 and November 30 of each calendar year. The annual minimum work expenditure requirements are $400 for each 160 acre claim and $100 for each 40 acre claim ($2.50 per acre). The State Claims are currently in good standing and Peak Gold plans to complete all work commitments, pay all annual claim rental fees, and file all appropriate annual labor documents to maintain the State Claims in good standing. None of the State Claims have been surveyed by a registered land or mineral surveyor and there is no State or federal law or regulation requiring such surveying.
| 3.2.2. | LEASED LAND |
|---|
Juneau Exploration, LP doing business as Juneau Mining Company (Juneau) entered into a mineral lease with the TRIBE OF TETLIN aka the NATIVE VILLAGE OF TETLIN, whose governmental entity is Tetlin Tribal Council (Tetlin Council) effective July 15, 2008 (as amended and assigned, the “Lease”) covering the Leased Land. By a series of assignments, Peak Gold succeeded to Juneau’s interest under the Lease. The primary term of the Lease has been extended through July 15, 2028 and the Lease can be further extended past the primary term for so long as Peak Gold continues exploration, development, or mining activities on the Leased Land.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 3-5 |
|---|

The Tetlin Council holds fee simple title to the Leased Land. The Lease provides Peak Gold the exclusive, complete, and unrestricted right to make any use or uses of the Leased Land to explore for, develop, mine, remove, treat, and sell all ore and minerals on the Leased Land.
Pursuant to the Lease, Peak Gold is required to make minimum expenditures in order to maintain the Lease in addition to making certain production royalty payments to the Tetlin Council. Peak Gold must spend a minimum of $350,000 a year exploring, evaluating, or developing the Leased Land. Peak Gold has accumulated enough work credit to last through December 31, 2029. Peak Gold makes annual advanced minimum royalty payments to the Tetlin Council of $75,000 a year, plus an escalation adjustment equal to $75,000 x the CPI percentage increase (as published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics) during the period from January 1, 2012 to the immediately preceding January 1 prior to the date of disbursement. Recently, the Native Village of Tetlin exercised its option (stated in the Lease) of “buying up” its royalty 0.75% for a cost of $450,000 to be deducted from Peak Gold’s initial royalty payments. If and when production is achieved, Peak Gold will begin paying the Tetlin Council a production royalty less all of the advanced royalty payments and the $450,000 “buy up” payment.
The current production royalty for gold, silver, platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, osmium, iridium, or any other precious metals or gems to the Native Village of Tetlin per the Lease is as follows:
| • | 3.0% NSR - First four years of full-scale production |
|---|---|
| • | 4.0% NSR - Fifth, sixth and seventh years of full-scaled production |
| --- | --- |
| • | 5.0% NSR - Eighth and subsequent years of full-scale production |
| --- | --- |
In addition to the above-mentioned royalties, Peak Gold owes a production royalty to Royal Gold, Inc. which is as follows:
| • | 3.0% NSR on the Lease |
|---|---|
| • | 3.0% NSR on State Mining Claims |
| --- | --- |
| • | 28% NSR on Silver from the Lease |
| --- | --- |
| • | 28% NSR on Silver from State Mining Claims |
| --- | --- |
| 3.3. | ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES |
| --- | --- |
The QP is not aware of any environmental liabilities on the property. Peak Gold JV has all required permits to conduct the proposed work on the property. The QP is not aware of any other significant factors and risks that may affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform the proposed work program on the property.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 3-6 |
|---|

| 4. | ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY |
|---|---|
| 4.1. | ACCESSIBILITY |
| --- | --- |
The paved Alaska Highway 2 passes through the northern edge of the Leased lands. The paved Tok Cut-off of the Glenn Highway passes within a kilometer of the Leased Lands and traverses through the Eagle and Hona claim blocks along the NW side of the Project. The 23-mile-long Tetlin Village Access (TVA) Road provides year-round access to the northern Tetlin Hills, linking Tetlin Village to the Alaska Highway.
A new Twin Road will be constructed parallel to the existing TVA Road and cross the TVA Road where the Twin Road meets the Manh Choh Mine Access Road (Figure 4‑1).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 4-1 |
|---|

FIGURE 4‑1 SITE ACCESS

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 4-2 |
|---|

| 4.2. | CLIMATE |
|---|
The Project area (elevation range 900 MASL to 1,000 MASL) has a dry-winter continental subarctic climate. Summer daytime temperatures on the Project are typically in the 60°F to 80°F range with summertime lows in the 40°F to 50°F range. Winter daytime temperatures vary from highs in the +20^o^F range to lows in the -30°F to -50^o^F range. Average annual precipitation in the Project area, including snow fall, is 13 in. to 15 in., most of which falls as snow in the winter months. The majority of exploration takes place in summer months, however, mines in the area operate on a year-round basis.
The nearest weather station is approximately nine miles from the Project area in the town of Tok, Alaska (elevation 490 MASL). The station has recorded weather since 1954 (Table 4‑1).
TABLE 4‑1 TOK, ALASKA MONTHLY CLIMATE SUMMARY, PERIOD OF RECORD JUNE 1954 TO APRIL 2016
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Annual | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Max. Temperature (^°^F) | -6.5 | 7.6 | 24.7 | 44.3 | 60.4 | 70.4 | 72. | 68 | 54.4 | 31.5 | 8.6 | -3.4 | 36.1 |
| Average Min. Temperature (^°^F) | -24.6 | -15.9 | -6.4 | 16 | 29.8 | 39.9 | 43.7 | 39 | 29.3 | 12.8 | -9.8 | -21.1 | 11.1 |
| Average Total Precipitation (in.) | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.7 | 2.31 | 2.14 | 1.32 | 0.82 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 9.78 |
| Average Total Snow (in.) | 4.7 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 5. | 35.7 |
| Average Snow Depth (in.) | 15 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 7 |
Source: Western Regional Climate Center
| 4.3. | LOCAL RESOURCES AND INFRASTRUCTURE |
|---|
The nearest town to the Project is Tok with a population of approximately 1,250 people. Roads connect Tok to both Fairbanks and Anchorage. Tok area medical needs are served primarily by the Tok Clinic and EMS which are based in the same facility. If more advanced medical treatment is needed, patients are typically air-lifted via air ambulance to a medical center in Fairbanks.
Tok and the Tetlin Village are part of the Alaska Gateway School District. Tok School is a K–12 campus while the Tetlin Village school is a P-12 campus. There is also a small University of Alaska office that provides distance education and even some local classes for the small community.
Power for the site is being supplied by a local utility company, AP&T, in conjunction with Golden Valley Electrical Association. The nearest line power is approximately 100 miles northwest serving the town of Delta Junction. An existing well (TET) has been used to provide a water supply for exploration and resource drilling.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 4-3 |
|---|

| 4.4. | PHYSIOGRAPHY |
|---|
The Project is situated in an area of varied topographic relief with elevations ranging from 1,600 ft along the Tanana River to over 8,300 ft at the top of Noyes Mountain. Mountainous terrain, primarily in the southern part of the Project, comprises approximately 50% of the Project with the remaining lands being composed of low rolling hills and wetlands. Two mountain belts are present in the Project. From north to south these are the Tetlin Hills and the Mentasta Mountains, a subsidiary unit of the Alaska Range. The Tetlin Hills extend from the Tanana River flats on the north and east to the Tok River flats on the west and to the lakeshore of Tetlin Lake on the south. In the Tetlin Hills, ridges are generally rounded and typically have flat rubble crop and alpine tundra covered summits with maximum elevations reaching 3,300 ft. North and west facing hillsides are forested with black spruce, aspen, birch, and alder. Lower elevations are often poorly drained due in part to discontinuous permafrost conditions and are covered by soft muskeg and stunted black spruce forest. Outcrops occur locally along the ridgelines but colluvial and vegetative cover mask bedrock on hillsides and valley bottoms. Much of the northern and western portions of the Tetlin Hills have been burned by wildfires during the 1990s and early 2000s to as recently as June and July 2016. In these burned areas, black and white spruce have been largely replaced by deciduous species, including aspen, birch, willow, and alder.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 4-4 |
|---|

| 5. | HISTORY |
|---|---|
| 5.1. | PRIOR OWNERSHIP |
| --- | --- |
In 2008, Juneau entered into a mineral lease with the Tetlin Council covering the Leased Land. By a series of assignments, Peak Gold JV succeeded to Juneau’s interest under the Lease. In late 2009, Ken Peak, President & CEO of Contango Oil & Gas Co. acquired 50% of Juneau’s interest and placed this into a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary, Contango Mining Co. Contango Mining Co. acquired the remaining 50% in 2010 and Contango Ore (Contango) became a public company. In 2014, Contango entered into a joint venture agreement with Royal Gold, whereby Royal Gold took over operatorship of the Peak Gold JV and spent $30 million by end of October 2018 in order to earn a 40% interest in the Project. On September 30, 2020, Contango and Royal Gold announced that KGMA had acquired Royal Gold’s 40% interest and an additional 30% interest from Contango. Contango retains 30% of Peak Gold JV and is a 100% owner of the State Leases.
| 5.2. | EXPLORATION HISTORY |
|---|
The following is summarized from JDS Energy & Mining Inc. (2018). Historically, the name of the Project was the Peak Gold Project, which included the Main Peak, North Peak, and West Peak deposits, and these names are used in this subsection. In 2021, the Project was renamed “Manh Choh Project” and the deposits were renamed, respectively, Manh Choh South, Manh Choh North, and Manh Choh West.
Units of measure vary in this section, and where appropriate, values have been rounded to the nearest unit for consistency (e.g., foot or metre).
| 5.2.1. | PRE-2008 |
|---|
The first known arrival of a prospector to what is now the Manh Choh Project was in 1908 when James Northway brought a steam prospecting boiler to Tanacross and then set up a trading post at Tetlin Village the following spring (Brown, 1984). No other mention of Northway’s prospecting efforts is available. In the fall of 1913, prospector Andrew Taylor recovered approximately 200 ounces of gold from his discovery on the Chisana River bordering the eastern Project area. A small rush to the district occurred, however, it was short-lived as the district was soon found to contain few large or paying placer gold deposits. By the summer of 1914, the district had left many of those working in search of better ground (Capps, 1916).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-1 |
|---|

Mineral exploration in the Project area came to a halt on June 10, 1930 when the approximately 750,000 acre Tetlin Reserve was established by the signing of Executive Order 5365 by President Herbert Hoover (Brown, 1984). Although mineral prospecting and development under the 1872 Mining Law was contemplated for the Tetlin Reserve at some future date, such activities needed adoption of enabling regulations. Attempts were made to promote the passage of such regulations, however, no such regulations were put forth and the Tetlin Reserve remained closed to mineral entry. Part of the reason that the Tetlin Reserve was never opened to mineral entry was the statements by noted U.S. Geological Survey Geologist Dr. Phillip Smith, who indicated that “there was but slight chance of any minerals of consequence being found within the area”. Dr. Smith also indicated that although he thought the Tetlin Reserve should be open to mineral entry as a matter of principle, “the tentative boundaries of the reservation were laid down so that all areas judged to be mineral bearing were excluded” from the Tetlin Reserve (Brown, 1984).
No other significant prospecting or geological work was reported from the Tetlin lands until the late 1960s. Approximately 40 geochemical samples were collected on the extreme southern edge of the Project area during regional geologic mapping and geochemical sampling conducted by the USGS in the late 1960s and early 1970s (Matson and Richter, 1971a; Matson and Richter, 1971b; Matson and Richter, 1971c). All of these samples are located in the extreme south end of the Project area and analyses were conducted by atomic absorption for gold and by semi-quantitative emission spectrography for all other elements. This work revealed no significant gold or base metal anomalies, possibly due to the crude, high detection limit analytical methods used.
The Tetlin Reserve was revoked in 1971 upon passage of the landmark Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA). ANCSA authorized the formation of 12 Alaska Native regional corporations and over 200 Alaska Native village corporations to which 44 million acres of land (generally including both surface and minerals) have been conveyed. Because a reserve had been established for the Tetlin Council, ANCSA allowed the TNC to choose whether (1) to make selections of a limited quantity of surface estate under ANCSA in the vicinity of the village and to participate in the broader benefits of ANCSA or (2) to take fee simple title to the lands within its former reserve and thereby forgo all other benefits under ANCSA (including revenue sharing under section 7(i)-(j) of ANCSA). TNC chose the latter option and took fee simple surface and subsurface title to approximately 743,000 acres of land over the old Tetlin Reserve. TNC later transferred all lands south of the midline of the Tanana River, approximately 675,000 acres, to the Tetlin Council, which represented the only inhabited village within the 675,000-acre tract. TNC retained corporate ownership of the remaining lands north of the Tanana River. The mineral location closure that had been in effect since 1930 became permanent on both the TNC lands and on Leased Land.
In the mid-1970s, the Tetlin Council allowed Resources Associates of Alaska (RAA), a Fairbanks-based mineral consulting firm, to conduct a limited reconnaissance mineral survey of their lands. The results of this work are not available and attempts to locate data from this effort have not been successful. Limited information on this program indicated that reconnaissance-level geochemical sampling of some sort was conducted in 1976 and eight days of field work were completed in 1980. This work succeeded in discovering a tungsten skarn occurrence (exact location unknown) and two massive pyrite occurrences with nearby Cu-Pb-Zn exhalite horizons in the Meiklejohn Pass area (exact location unknown, Eng, 1980).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-2 |
|---|

| 5.2.2. | 2008 TO 2021 |
|---|
The Lease was acquired by Juneau, an affiliate of Contango, in mid-June 2008. Mineral exploration work was conducted on the property in 2009 through 2013, and 2015 through 2018. Initial field work on the Leased Lands was completed in mid-June 2009 by Avalon Development Corporation (Avalon), a contractor to Peak Gold JV through 2018. Phase 1 field work included 270 man-days of project-wide helicopter supported reconnaissance geochemical sampling and prospecting. Field work was conducted with a Hughes 500D helicopter and included evaluation of over 40 high priority sites identified by pre-season remote sensing analysis. During this one-month work program, the four two-person teams collected a total of 387 rock samples, 94 pan concentrate samples, and 11 stream sediment samples over the Project area (Table 5‑1). Gold was found in a rock sample at the Discovery zone during this phase of work.
TABLE 5‑1 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL WORK ON MANH CHOH PROJECT
| Year | Core<br><br> (m) | Core<br><br> <br>Samples | Rock<br><br> <br>Samples | Soil<br><br> <br>Samples | Pan<br><br> <br>Concentrate<br><br> <br>Samples | Stream<br><br> <br>Sediment<br><br> <br>Samples | Geophysics<br><br> (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 0.00 | 0 | 958 | 33 | 94 | 11 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0.00 | 0 | 613 | 760 | 668 | 795 | 14 |
| 2011 | 2,456 | 1,267 | 20 | 688 | 0 | 0 | 3,957 |
| 2012 | 10,974 | 5,223 | 82 | 1,029 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14,333 | 8,970 | 14 | 1,406 | 85 | 278 | 2,414 |
| 2014 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 14,059 | 8,352 | 133 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 20,523 | 10,450 | 21 | 694 | 0 | 0 | 23.5 |
| 2017 | 18,088 | 11,864 | 112 | 975 | 408 | 408 | 48.0 |
| 2018 | 6,059 | 2,973 | 420 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 32.6 |
| Total | 86,509 | 49,099 | 2.373 | 5,585 | 1,256 | 1,501 | 6,489 |
Phase 2 work in 2009 consisted of limited field follow-up of the initial rock and pan concentrate sample anomalies at the Chief Danny prospect. The area covers the current MCS and MCN deposits, as well as other prospects. The work was completed in early September and included collection of 49 rock samples and 33 soil samples. Possible road access routes were also identified during this phase of work.
Phase 3 work in 2009 was designed to expose mineralization at the Discovery zone using heavy equipment. This program was completed in October. Following construction of a 13- mile-long pioneer trail to the Discovery zone, a total of 2,330 ft of dozer trenching was completed in four trenches. All trenches were mapped and a total of 522 rocks samples was collected in the trenches and along the access trail constructed to the site.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-3 |
|---|

Encouraging results from the 2009 program prompted Juneau/Contango to expand their efforts in 2010. The 2010 Phase 1 program included helicopter-supported reconnaissance level stream sediment and pan concentrate sampling and prospect-scale soil auger sampling, rock sampling, induced polarization (IP) ground geophysics, and prospecting (Brown et al., 2010). The stream sediment and pan concentrate sampling began in drainages surrounding the Chief Danny prospect area and worked concentrically outward from this area to eventually provide geochemical sampling coverage for most major stream drainages of the Tetlin Hills and several of the larger drainages on the southern end of the Project. The soil sample crews collected top of bedrock soil auger samples on the Chief Danny prospect and surrounding areas. During this phase of work, the exploration stream sediment/pan concentrate teams collected a total of 296 rock samples, 667 pan concentrate samples, and 795 stream sediment samples over the Project area. Exploration in the Chief Danny prospect area resulted in collection of 292 rock samples and 560 soil samples. Zonge Engineering completed 9.65 line-km of dipole-dipole IP ground geophysics over the main Chief Danny prospect area.
The encouraging results from 2010 Phase 1 soil sampling and IP surveys prompted Juneau/Contango to approve additional IP and soil sampling as part of a Phase 2, 2010 field program. Phase 2 soil and IP surveys on the Chief Danny prospect were conducted between September 7 and October 8 (Brown et al., 2010; Fleming and Pendrigh, 2010). Work concentrated on the expansion of the Chief Danny IP geophysics coverage, initial IP coverage of a coincident gold-copper-arsenic anomaly at the Saddle zone, and limited top of bedrock soil auger sampling over the new IP lines completed. A total of 200 top of bedrock soil auger samples and 25 grab rock samples were collected during Phase 2 work. In addition, a total of 4.5 line-km of IP geophysics was completed east of the Chief Danny prospects and in the Saddle zone. Interpretive work was conducted by Windels (2010) and Beasley (2010) using IP, regional-scale magnetics and project geochemical data.
The Tok claim block was staked by Contango in 2010 and expanded in 2012. There is no record of any mineral exploration work on these lands in the past. Subsequent exploration of these lands, which are located west of and adjacent to the Leased Land, was conducted in 2010, 2012, 2013, and 2015 through 2018. The incremental cost of exploration on the Tok lands was not tracked separately in 2010 but in 2012 it was considered part of the MM prospect where soil auger sampling was conducted. A total of 358 soil auger samples were collected on the MM prospect in 2012. Airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys were conducted over the Tok claims and 99 soil auger samples collected at MM in 2013.
The 2011 exploration program at the Project consisted of three phases of work extending from late April through mid-October. Phase 1 work consisted of 3,957.3 line-km of DIGHEM airborne magnetics and electromagnetics completed by Fugro Airborne Surveys before the summer field season began (Fugro, 2011). The survey covered four (non-contiguous) areas including the Tetlin Hills block (includes the Chief Danny-MM-Chisana prospect areas, 2,004.3 line-km), the Taixtsalda Hill block (352.6 line-km), the Copper Hill block (1,421.9 line-km), and the Triple Z block (178.5 line-km). Flight lines were N-S on all blocks with tie lines at right angles on all blocks except Copper Hill where topographic considerations required modification of the tie line directions to azimuth 123° (303°). Flight line spacing over the main Chief Danny prospect in the Tetlin Hills block was 100 m while spacing on all other blocks was 200 m. Instrument height above ground was 35 m for both the magnetic and electromagnetic sensors. Final digital products delivered from this work included all raw data, electromagnetic anomaly maps, calculated vertical gradient maps, residual magnetic intensity maps, and 56,000 Hz, 7,200 Hz and 900 Hz resistivity maps. A detailed summary of the program and equipment used is presented in Fugro (2011). Interpretive work was conducted by Windels (2011) using this magnetics and resistivity data. Geophysical contractors Zonge Engineering, Condor Geophysics, and Kim Cook also conducted geophysical reinterpretation work on data from the Project area during 2015 through 2018.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-4 |
|---|

Phase 2 efforts in 2011 consisted of top of bedrock soil auger sampling on the Chief Danny prospect and lesser amounts of reconnaissance soil auger sampling on the MM and Chisana prospects and shovel soil sampling on the Copper Hill prospect. During this phase of work 668 soil auger and 20 grab rock samples were collected at Chief Danny, 304 soil auger and one grab rock sample was collected at MM, 327 soil auger samples were collected at Chisana and 290 shovel soil samples, 16 grab rock samples, five pan concentrate samples, and one stream sediment sample were collected at Copper Hill.
Phase 3 work in 2011 consisted of 2,456 m of drilling in 11 diamond core holes (1,267 core samples, Table 6-1). With the exception of part of one hole, all core drilled was HQ diameter (2.5 inch). This drilling was conducted by Connors Drilling of Montrose, Colorado using a CS1000 fly-capable drill rig.
The 2012 exploration program consisted of top of bedrock soil auger sampling at the Chief Danny, Taixtsalda, and MM prospects and 36,004 ft of diamond core drilling in 50 drill holes at the Chief Danny prospect. The drilling was conducted by Connors Drilling of Montrose, Colorado using a CS14 wheel mounted drill rig and a CS1000 fly-capable drill rig. All core drilled was HQ diameter (2.5 inch). Initial field efforts consisted of 137 soil samples at Taixtsalda to cover coincident airborne magnetic and resistivity anomalies and 357 soil samples along the ridges above anomalous pan concentrate and stream sediment gold and pathfinder element anomalies in the streams draining the MM prospect. A total of 534 soil samples and 82 grab rock samples were collected on the western and southern margins of the Chief Danny prospect during 2012. Drilling with the CS14 drill rig at the Discovery zone at the Chief Danny prospect began on May 23 and continued at several other targets through September 21.
In addition to exploration work in 2012, several other project improvements were completed. Initial baseline water sampling was conducted by ABR, Inc. of Fairbanks, Alaska in May and September. The “Eagle” claims were staked on state land adjacent to and west of the Leased Lands. This new block consists of 217 state claims and covers 32,187 acres. No field work was conducted on these claims in 2012. During July and August, an additional four miles of access road was permitted and constructed between the Tetlin Village road and the 2009 Chief Danny Road. This new spur road cut travel distance to the Chief Danny Prospect by nearly 11 miles and allowed year-round access to the Project.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-5 |
|---|

The 2013 exploration program at the Project consisted of four phases of work extending from late May through early-October. Initial work consisted of 1,622.9 line-km (1,420.4 line-km N-W and 202.5 line-km E-W) of frequency-domain DIGHEM airborne magnetics and electromagnetics completed by Fugro Airborne Surveys before the summer field season began (Table 6-1, Fugro, 2013a and Fugro, 2013b, and Beard, 2013). This part of the survey expanded the 2011 airborne coverage in the Tetlin Hills and included the Eagle prospect to the NW of the Tetlin Hills. The survey consisted of three separate blocks: the north edge of the Tetlin Hills (274.9 line-km), south margin of the Tetlin Hills (556.8 line-km) and the newly acquired Eagle claims to the NW (791.2 line-km). Flight lines were N-S on all blocks with tie lines at right angles on all blocks. Flight line spacing was 200 m. Instrument height above ground was 35 m for both the magnetic and electromagnetic sensors. Final digital products delivered from this work included all raw data, electromagnetic anomaly maps, calculated vertical gradient maps, residual magnetic intensity maps, and 56,000 Hz, 7,200 Hz and 900 Hz resistivity maps. In addition, 791.1 line-km of time-domain HELITEM electromagnetic survey (706.1 line-km N-S and 85 line-km E-W) was conducted over the Chief Danny zone and vicinity. A detailed summary of the program and equipment used is presented in Fugro (2013). All geophysical survey data from 2010 through 2013 as well as all other technical data was then merged and reinterpreted by Condor Geophysics of Denver, CO (Cunion, 2013).
During 2013, Contango completed 14,350 m of diamond core drilling in 69 holes at the Chief Danny prospect. All but eight of these holes, totaling 2,189 m, were drilled in the Peak zone. The majority of the drilling was conducted by Connors Drilling of Montrose, Colorado using a CS14 wheel mounted drill rig and a CS1000 fly-capable drill rig. A second CS14 was added to the program in mid-August. Following repeated mechanical issues with one of the CS14 drills, it was replaced in late August by a similar CS14 drill provided by CnC Drilling of Fairbanks, Alaska. All core drilled was HQ3 diameter (6.06 cm/2.406 in) using ACT 2 and three orientation tools in conjunction with a split tube system. Drilling commenced on May 29 and continued through October 3.
Following completion of the 2013 drilling program at the Peak zone, Contango published its first resource estimate for the Peak zone (Giroux, 2013b). This resource estimate includes data from 130 drill holes totaling 27,767 m for diamond core drilling. The resource estimate was not made public.
During the 2013 field program, a total of 1,406 top of bedrock, soil samples were collected in the Tetlin Hills. Samples were collected on 100 m by 100 m grids in twenty target areas and along the Chief Danny drill road over six prospects. Sample collection targets were selected to expand on previously sampled areas and to collect samples in areas with coincident high magnetic susceptibility and high conductivity geophysical signatures, similar to that seen in the Peak zone. From these sample areas, 243 samples were collected in the Chief Danny prospect, 498 samples were collected in Chisana, 74 samples were collected in Himalaya, 99 samples were collected in MM, 453 samples were collected in Tors, and 30 samples were collected in Wishbone.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-6 |
|---|

The approximately 56,000-acre Eagle claim block was staked in 2012 and 2013 as a response to the Peak zone discovery and subsequent drilling program. The Eagle block is underlain by similar geology as the northern Tetlin Hills and limited reconnaissance stream sediment and pan concentrate samples collected by Federal government agencies in the 1970s revealed widespread copper and arsenic anomalies within the area now covered by the Eagle claims. No field work was conducted on the Eagle claims in 2012, however, a reconnaissance level stream sediment and pan concentrate sampling program completed over the Eagle claims in 2013. This work resulted in collection of eight rock samples, 278 stream sediment samples, 85 pan concentrate samples, and coverage of the SE half of the Eagle claims by DIGHEM airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys.
Examination of existing regional geological and geochemical data also prompted Contango to stake the Bush and West Fork claim blocks in early 2013. Each of these claim blocks consists of 48 State of Alaska mining claims covering 7,680 acres. These claim blocks, located north of Leased Lands, exhibited copper and arsenic anomalies similar to those within the Eagle block. No field work was required or conducted on these two claims blocks in 2013.
The environmental baseline program started in 2012 was continued and expanded during 2013. Fairbanks-based ABR, Inc. conducted seasonal baseline water quality samples, and completed initial biotic inventories of fish, macroinvertebrates, and periphyton. Water quality sampling was conducted at 16 sites in June and again in October. Fish sampling was conducted at six sites during July. In addition to the above baseline environmental monitoring work, an initial Wetland Determination study was completed on 3,180 acres of the Tetlin Hills in mid-August. This work was centered on the Chief Danny prospect access roads and covered the majority of the prospect’s gold and copper in soil anomalies. A weather station was also installed at Vertical Angle Bench Mark (VABM) Tetling in July to provide climatic data for environmental baseline studies and to provide weather conditions for flight operations on the Project. Information from the solar powered wet-cell battery weather station was connected to an internet uplink allowing real-time data analysis.
No field operations were conducted during 2014.
In 2015, Royal Alaska, LLC, a subsidiary of Royal Gold, and Core Alaska, LLC, a subsidiary of Contango, entered into a joint venture agreement for the Peak Gold Project.
Exploration efforts during 2015 included two phases of drilling in the Chief Danny area, Phase 1 in May through July and Phase 2 in September and October, separated by a month of data analysis and budgeting in August.
In addition to the drilling in 2015, a total of 133 rock samples were collected over the Eagle and Noah prospects and Peak Gold JV continued baseline water quality and wetlands jurisdiction studies. Late in the fall, the Project acquired a post-wildfire air photo of the northern Tetlin Hills to document the extent of the fire and the nature of disturbances created by the Alaska Division of Forestry during its firefighting efforts.
In 2016, three phases of drilling were completed to test targets in the North Peak, West Peak and East Peak areas. In addition to the drilling in 2016, the Peak Gold JV completed 23.5 line-km of dipole-dipole ground IP geophysics by Quantec Geosciences Ltd., collected 694 top-of-bedrock soil auger samples over the Ridgeline prospect SW of Main Peak, and continued baseline water quality and wetlands jurisdiction studies. Peak Gold JV also commenced efforts toward completion of the first resource update since late 2013. Tucson-based Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (IMC) was selected to complete this work as 2017 Phase 1 data became available.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-7 |
|---|

Following an interpretive review of the airborne geophysical surveys conducted by Contango in 2011 and 2013 and by the State Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys in 2014 (Emond et al., 2015), the Peak Gold JV staked 219 State of Alaska mining claims cover 34,440 acres over what is known as the Noah claim block. In early 2017, the Noah block was expanded with the staking of an additional 222 State of Alaska mining claims coving an additional 34,440 acres. The Noah claims are located contiguous with and west of the Leased Land block and contiguous with and south of the Eagle claim block.
Phase 1 drilling in the period January through mid-April 2017 consisted of infill and expansion drilling at North Peak as well as scout drilling at the West Peak (PT pad) and True Blue Moon targets. The drilling consisted of 40 drill holes (3,702 m) in the North Peak zone, one hole (281 m) in the PT target at West Peak zone and six holes (1,251 m) in the True Blue Moon target. The majority of the North Peak drilling was targeted at infill and perimeter drilling to better define the resource estimate being conducted by IMC. The drill target at West Peak was an exploration hole targeting a magnetic high not previously tested by drilling. The True Blue Moon drilling targeted a multi-discipline magnetic-resistivity-soil anomaly along the general NW trend of the North Peak deposit. SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc. (SRK) was retained to take over all permitting and environmental affairs management for the Peak Gold JV, resulting in submission of the Project’s first individual wetlands permit through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This work was accompanied by wetlands reclamation conducted in April 2017.
Phase 2 work was conducted from May through August 2017 and consisted of core drilling, IP geophysics, and geochemical sampling. Core drilling of 16 drill holes (3,374 m) was carried out in the Main Peak, 7 O’clock, West Peak Extension, and Waterpump zones. Drilling at Main Peak was for confirmation and metallurgical purposes while drilling at the other three zones was exploration oriented to follow up on previously identified geochemical and geophysical targets. Ontario-based Quantec Geosciences Ltd completed 47.9 line-km of pole-dipole IP including:
| • | Infill over the NW extensions of the Main Peak and North Peak deposits (primarily in Waterpump Creek), |
|---|---|
| • | Expansion of the 7 O’clock target area; and, |
| --- | --- |
| • | Expansion of the 8 O’clock area. |
| --- | --- |
Phase 2 work also included collection of 873 top of bedrock soil samples and 14 grab rock samples in the South Limb, String of Pearls and southern 8 O’clock areas. Later in the summer, the Peak Gold JV collected 363 pan concentrate samples, 364 stream sediment, and five grab rock samples over the Noah and southern Eagle claim blocks and completed logging, photographing, and Niton XRF analysis of the 885 m of split core from three Hona prospect core holes loaned to the Project by Kinross.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-8 |
|---|

In June 2017 Peak Gold JV completed a mineral resource estimate update on the Main Peak and North Peak deposits (IMC, 2017). IMC completed this work using drilling data available through the end of 2017 Phase 1. The resource estimate was considered compliant with CIM Definition Standards (2014) incorporated by reference in Canadian National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. This resource estimate is superseded by the Mineral Resource reported in Section 11 of this TRS.
During Phase 2, SRK continued its efforts to obtain an Individual Permit for the Peak Gold JV from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This wetlands permit was eventually awarded late in 2017. In addition, Peak Gold JV conducted extensive reclamation of the greater Chief Danny area with focus on the North Peak, Waterpump, Main Peak, New Moon, and TBM prospect areas. At the conclusion of this work, all past wetlands disturbances had been reclaimed.
On September 26 and 27, 2017, Peak Gold JV conducted its first use of a drone for airborne photogrammetric work. The work was conducted by Anchorage-based K2 Dronotics who conducted surveys over 1,096 acres of the Project. Coverage included the Main Peak – North Peak deposits as well as adjacent surrounding areas. The Main Peak – North Peak area, covering 269 acres, was covered at a resolution of at least 2 inches per pixel from an instrument height above ground of 380 ft. The surrounding areas, broken up into six additional blocks totaling 827 additional acres, were covered at a resolution of at least 3 inches per pixel from an instrument height above ground of 400 ft.
Phase 3 exploration for 2017 was conducted in September and October and consisted of drilling of 16 core holes (2,966 m) in the 7 O’clock, West Peak Extension, Forks and North Peak areas. Other than the North Peak drilling, all of the Phase 3 drilling was exploration in nature and designed to expand or follow up on previously identified targets. The North Peak drilling was designed to test down-dip mineralization on the southern edge of the North Peak resource.
During 2018, Phase 1 exploration, conducted from mid-April to June, consisted of 34.1 line-km of pole-dipole IP, 43.4 line-km of Titan 24 DCIP-MT ground geophysics, and core drilling at the 2 O’clock and 8 O’clock zones (nine holes, 957 m). Additional drilling was conducted in the second half of 2018. Fairbanks-based ABR Inc. conducted an early summer water quality sampling program on May 29 and 30 with another round of sampling in mid-September. Additional Titan 24 DCIP-MT ground geophysics at Copper Hill and Taixtsalda prospects and core drilling at Copper Hill and North Saddle also were conducted in August through October 2018.
In September 2018, JDS Energy & Mining Inc. (JDS) prepared a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) on the Project, which envisaged a conventional open pit truck and shovel operation with gold processing with cyanide leaching at a rate of 3,500 tonnes per day (tpd) over the potential Project life of eight years.
On September 30, 2020, Contango and Royal Gold each announced that a subsidiary of Kinross, KG Mining (Alaska), Inc., had acquired Royal Gold’s 40% interest and an additional 30% interest from Contango, and was appointed Manager and Operator of the newly formed Peak Gold JV.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-9 |
|---|

During 2020 to 2022, further drilling was completed including resource and development drilling and exploration drilling within 5 km of the deposit area.
Further details of drilling at the Project are provided in Section 7.2.
| 5.3. | PAST PRODUCTION |
|---|
There has been no production from the property up to the effective date of the report.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 5-10 |
|---|

| 6. | GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION, AND DEPOSIT |
|---|---|
| 6.1. | REGIONAL GEOLOGY |
| --- | --- |
The Tok area is located in the eastern portion of the Yukon-Tanana Terrane (YTT) (Nokleberg et al., 1994). The YTT is bounded by the Tintina Fault system to the north and Denali Fault system to the south. These parallel, dextral strike slip faults form major sutures with up to 400 km of offset since the middle Cretaceous (Flanigan et al., 2000). The YTT is thought to be a Devonian volcanic arc along the continental margin of the North American Craton (Aleinikoff et al., 1981, Nokleberg et al., 1994). Regional geology is illustrated in Figure 6‑1.
Subsequent mapping has subdivided the YTT into several broad lithologic packages. Nokleberg et al. (1992) and Foster et al. (1994) have correlated rocks within the Project area to the Jarvis Creek Glacier (JCG) subterrane. Rocks of the JCG are greenschist to granulite facies metamorphic rocks of Mississippian or older age. Rocks consist of fine-grained polydeformed schist derived from sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Metasedimentary rocks are pelitic schist, quartzite, calcareous schist, quartz-feldspar schist, and marble. Metavolcanic rocks are meta-andesite and metaquartz-keratophyre with minor components of metadacite, metabasalt, and rare metarhyolite.
The YTT is intruded by Mesozoic and Cenozoic plutonic rocks (Foster et al., 1994; Illig, 2015). The intrusives are largely unfoliated and predominantly felsic to intermediate composition. Radiometric age dates indicate that most of the plutonic rocks in the Tok area are Late Triassic to Late Tertiary. Volcanic rocks were deposited during the Cretaceous and Cenozoic and are largely found in the eastern YTT. The Tertiary and Holocene volcanic rocks are rhyolite to basalt. Illig (2015) conducted argon-argon dating of hornblende from the volcanic rocks north of the Project area. Age dates from hornblende andesite volcanic rocks returned a mean 40Ar/39Ar age of 75.5+0.7 Ma.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-1 |
|---|

FIGURE 6‑1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF THE YUKON TANANA UPLANDS,
EASTERN AND CENTRAL ALASKA

From Foster et al (1994), modified by Kinross Gold Corp, 2021.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-2 |
|---|

| 6.2. | LOCAL GEOLOGY |
|---|
The Project is located largely within poly-metamorphic rocks of the YTT. Mapping by Foster (1970) and Richter (1976) has defined several broad lithologic packages which Nokleberg et al. (1992) and Foster, Keith and Menzie (1994) correlate with the Jarvis Creek Glacier subterrane, the southernmost of four regionally extensive subterranes identified within the YTT. Basement rocks in the Jarvis Creek subterrane are generally greenschist to granulite facies metamorphic rocks of Mississippian or older age. A brief description of these rock types on the Project follows.
The only published geologic maps available for the Leased Lands on the Project are 1:250,000 scale (one inch equals four miles) quadrangle maps dating from the 1970s (Foster, 1970; Richter, 1976). These regional scale maps provide only a basic framework geology for the Project. The northern half of the Project, primarily in the Tetlin Hills and extending to the NW onto the Project’s Eagle claim block, is mapped as poorly exposed calcareous and non-calcareous quartz-muscovite schist, quartz-biotite gneiss and schist, quartz-hornblende gneiss, quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss, augen gneiss, quartz-muscovite-garnet gneiss, and quartzite (Foster, 1970). Garnet is a common component in these rocks. Although not mapped by Foster (1970), the Tetlin Hills hosts a significant amount of carbonate-bearing rocks, ranging from clean marbles to calcareous schists with variable but significant carbonate content. These calcareous units, which are host to the MCS and MCN skarn mineralization, generally are less than two metres to three metres in individual thickness but can form mixed calcareous schist–pelitic schist packages over 30 m (100 m) in thickness.
A gradational metamorphic isograd boundary separates higher grade schist and gneiss on the north from lower grade schist and phyllite units to the south. These lower grade rocks consist of light pink, light green, tan, and gray phyllite, quartz-sericite schist, quartz-sericite-chlorite schist, quartzite, and marble. In the Alaska Range in the SW part of the Tanacross quadrangle, these rocks are primarily light pink, light green, gray, and tan phyllite with some included greenstone. Several discontinuous marble beds up to 15 m (50 ft) thick and associated quartzite units occur in this rock package although they are not mapped separately by Foster (1970) or Richter (1976). Foster (1970) reported two age dates from the biotite gneiss and schist unit on the SE end of the Eagle claim block about 16 km (10 miles) south of Tok near the Tok Cutoff to the Glenn Highway. A Rb87/Sr87 age date returned an age of 120 Ma from biotite while a muscovite sample returned a K40/Ar40 age date of 119 Ma and a Rb87/Sr87 age date of 524 Ma. A Rb87/Sr87 whole rock age date of 1,173 Ma suggesting that rocks are likely Precambrian to Paleozoic in age and have been reset by more than one period of regional metamorphism.
Southward, the rocks become more schistose with quartz-sericite schist, quartz-sericite-chlorite schist, quartz-graphite-schist, and quartzite becoming the dominant rock types. Rocks of this unit are primarily greenschist facies. These lower-grade schists and phyllites are intruded by small bodies of gray altered and metamorphosed diorite that occur as small sills, dikes, and plugs. Intrusives become more common to the south and extend into the northern Nabesna Quadrangle where Richter (1976) mapped these rocks as more continuous sillform bodies and described these units as fine to coarse-grained augite and hornblende bearing diorite and gabbro. These rocks have an equigranular hypidiomorphic to ophitic textures consisting principally of ophitic augite, saussuritized calcic plagioclase, and minor hornblende. The primary plagioclase and the lack of foliation indicate that these diorite to gabbro units were emplaced after the primary folding and metamorphic events in this part of the Alaska Range.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-3 |
|---|

Dark-greenish-gray massive greenstone consisting chiefly of fine-grained epidote, chlorite, and albitized feldspar occur in the Copper Hill area of the Project and appears to be in fault contact with overlying marine metasedimentary rocks to the south (Richter, 1976). These greenstone units often are actinolite-bearing and in the Copper Hill prospect area contain <0.5% disseminate fine grained pyrite. These mafic extrusive units are commonly in fault contact above and below with dark-gray phyllite, dark-gray to buff quartzite and calcareous quartzite, light-gray slate, buff to light-gray calcareous quartz mica schist, and light-gray marble. Rocks are isoclinally folded with axial-plane schistosity well defined in the phyllite and schist layers. These phyllite and quartzite units are structurally overlain by dark-to light-gray phyllite and brownish-gray metaconglomerate containing conspicuous stretched clasts and subordinate quartz mica schist, quartzite, calcareous mica schist, quartz-chlorite schist, and thin marble lenses. Rocks exhibit well-defined axial plane schistosity deformed by a later period of kink-folding. Thermal metamorphism has locally produced cordierite- and andalusite-bearing knotty schists peripheral to the widespread plutonic rocks just north of the Denali fault. Gray to dark-gray recrystallized limestone is interbedded with the marine schists and phyllite units, often forming resistant pinnacles along ridgelines. Rugose and tabulate corals from widely scattered localities indicate a Middle Devonian age (Richter, 1976).
The southernmost portion of the Project is hosted in post-accretionary Jura-Cretaceous rocks of the Gravina-Nutzotin Terrane which are separated from metamorphic rocks of the YTT by the Denali fault. The Gravina-Nutzotin Terrane lies disconformably on the regionally extensive Wrangellia Terrane, which crops out on the extreme southern edge of the Project (Richter, 1976; Foster et al., 1994). Rocks of the Gravina-Nutzotin Terrane include a 900 m thick sequence of dark gray argillite and minor siltstone, mudstone, greywacke, and impure limestone. Conspicuous clasts of light-gray massive limestone, ranging in size from cobbles to house-size boulders, occur sporadically through the lowermost section. Sparsely distributed Buchia fossils throughout the unit indicate a Late Jurassic age. Clasts in the conglomerate consist of well-rounded volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks, limestone, chert, and crystalline igneous rocks derived from underlying strata, and white quartz and metamorphic rocks probably derived from the metamorphic terrane north of the Denali fault. These rocks are regionally extensive and correlative with Jura-Cretaceous flysch units of the Kahiltna Terrane to the SW (Nokleberg et al., 1994; Silberling et al., 1994).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-4 |
|---|

The Wrangellia Terrane is a regionally extensive allocthonous terrane separated from the YTT by the Denali fault (Nokleberg et al., 1994). The contact between the YTT and Wrangellia is obscured by the post-accretionary Gravina-Nutzotin Terrane. Dextral offsets of up to 8 m (26 ft) in a single event have been documented on the Denali fault as recently as 2002. The southern edge of the Project is hosted in the Slana River subterrane, the northern of two E-W trending Wrangellia subterranes in this part of Alaska. The Slana River subterrane consists mainly of:
| • | A thick sequence of Pennsylvanian and Permian island-arc andesite and dacite overlain by marine limestone, argillaceous chert, volcaniclastics<br> and tuffs of the Tetelna Volcanics, Slana Spur Formation, and Eagle Creek Formation which are part of the Skolai arc; |
|---|---|
| • | A 1,500 m thick sequence of disconformably overlying massive basalt flows of the Late Triassic Nikolai Group and co-genetic gabbroic and<br> ultramafic intrusives; and |
| --- | --- |
| • | Late Triassic limestone. |
| --- | --- |
Rocks of the YTT, Pingston, Windy McKinley, Gravina-Nutzotin, and Wrangellia Terrane are extensively intruded by Mesozoic and Cenozoic granitic rocks (Foster, Keith and Menzie, 1994; Illig, 2015; Benowitz et al., 2017; Sicard et al., 2017; and Twelker et al., 2016). These largely unfoliated, predominantly felsic to intermediate, plutonic rocks reach batholithic proportions east of the Shaw Creek fault (Foster, Keith and Menzie, 1994). Radiometric age dates indicate that most of the plutonic rocks west of the Shaw Creek fault are mid-Cretaceous to early Tertiary, whereas plutonic rocks east of the Shaw Creek Fault range from Late Triassic to Late Tertiary. Age dates have been used to subdivide the plutonic rocks of the YTT into three distinctive groups:
| • | Late Triassic – Early Jurassic (215 Ma – 188 Ma); |
|---|---|
| • | Mid- to Late Cretaceous (110 Ma – 85 Ma, with most clustering from 95 Ma – 90 Ma); and, |
| --- | --- |
| • | Latest Cretaceous to Eocene (70 Ma – 50 Ma) in two subgroups that cluster around 70 Ma and 55 Ma. |
| --- | --- |
Figure 6‑2 and Figure 6‑3 illustrate the stratigraphic column and a typical cross-section of the local geology, respectively.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-5 |
|---|

FIGURE 6‑2 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE MANH CHOH PROJECT, CHIEF DANNY AREA

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-6 |
|---|

FIGURE 6‑3 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF LOCAL GEOLOGY

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-1 |
|---|

| 6.3. | PROPERTY GEOLOGY |
|---|
The majority of the bedrock in the deposit area consist of quartz-muscovite ± biotite schist unit (QMS) containing conformable layers of amphibolite schist. The QMS unit is primarily comprised of quartz, muscovite, biotite, and local garnet with minor actinolite and epidote.
The deposit is hosted within a calcareous unit that hosts silicate skarn alteration as well as gold, silver, copper, and sulfide mineralization. The composition of the calcareous unit varies from rare pure marble through a gradational schist package ranging from a calcareous arenite to a silty marble.
Calcareous arenite to silty marble forms the primary host for skarn alteration and gold-sulfide mineralization. Calcareous schist is less competent than the surrounding rock package; it deforms more easily, resulting in complex deformational textures, including structural thickening and thinning, isoclinal and recumbent folding, cascade folding, and disharmonic folding. It is believed that most of the deformation exhibited by calcareous schist predates mineralization.
Layers of massive, equigranular amphibolite schist ranging from five feet to 50 ft thick are located south of the Spring fault (Figure 6‑4). This unit is weakly to moderately foliated with minor calcite and trace to minor disseminated pyrrhotite + chalcopyrite. Amphibolite is often interbedded with quartz-mica schist and/or calcareous schist. The rock is dark greenish-gray to black and can be distinguished in airborne magnetics due to its high magnetic susceptibility (Fugro, 2011).
Small plugs of hypabyssal intrusive bodies of felsic, intermediate, and mafic composition have intruded the country rock. The largest of these bodies, a porphyritic quartz monzodiorite, outcrops along the northern end of Mohawk Ridge (Figure 6‑4). The quartz monzonite body contains local zones of one to two centimeter thick A-type quartz-magnetite veins (Sillitoe, 2013).
Intermediate, mafic and felsic hypabyssal rocks and their more widespread volcanic equivalents are common along the extreme western edge of the Chief Danny area and north of the Tor fault (Figure 6‑4). These rocks are thought to be post-mineral in age and preserved at the current erosional surface due to north-side down motion on the Tors fault. See Figure 6‑2 for a generalized stratigraphic column of area rocks.
Linear stream drainages, low saddles, and distinctive magnetic and resistivity features within the Tetlin Hills define the surface expression of several fault orientations in this part of the Tetlin Project. The three dominant structural orientations in the Chief Danny prospect area include:
| • | NW striking high angle faults with dips to the north and south with both dip-slip and right-lateral strike-slip motion; |
|---|---|
| •<br><br> <br><br><br> <br>• | NE striking high angle faults with both dip-slip and left-lateral strike-slip motion, and<br><br> <br><br><br> <br>post-mineral north-south trending, east dipping reverse faults (Figure 6‑4) that truncate mineralization in the MCS and MCN deposit resource<br> area. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-1 |
| --- | --- |

SRK’s (2019) regional structural interpretation used deposit drill oriented and unoriented core data to model several fault interpretations within the deposit area. Cross-cutting relationships in the model conform to the regional paragenesis outlined with later syn- and post-mineral faulting offsetting earlier shallow southwest dipping thrust faults defining the overall deposit foliation fabric.
Weathering at Manh Choh is pervasive and largely controlled by the schist fabric, skarn alteration intensity, and intersecting faults. The MCN deposit has a deeper oxidation profile than the MCS deposit, characterized primarily by logged identification of more intense weathering minerals at depth and lower sulfur geochemical signature.
FIGURE 6‑4 GENERALIZED GEOLOGY OF THE CHIEF DANNY AREA
INCLUDING THE MANH CHOH SOUTH AND NORTH DEPOSITS OF THE TETLIN
PROJECT, ALASKA

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-2 |
|---|

Both argon-argon and uranium-lead dating was conducted by Illig (2015) on rocks from the skarn and surrounding rocks. Age dates from the hornblende quartz monzonite on Mohawk Ridge immediately west of the Manh Choh skarn deposit returned mean 40Ar/39Ar ages for hornblende of 69.4 + 0.5 Ma and a nearly identical uranium-lead zircon age of 69.7+ 0.2 Ma. Both of these ages are slightly younger than the 40Ar/39Ar ages of 71.5 + 0.5 Ma age returned from hornblende in the skarn (Figure 6‑5). Given these dates, the causative pluton responsible for the Manh Choh skarn deposit and other skarn-related mineralization in the Chief Danny area remain unknown.
FIGURE 6‑5 AGE DATES

Note. Age dates from Illig (2015); Hajdukovich age from Avalon Development, other Ar/Ar ages from Benowitz et al. (2017) and Newberry et al. (1998), U-Pb from Holm-Denoma et al (2020)
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-3 |
|---|

| 6.4. | MINERALIZATION |
|---|
The Manh Choh Project contains two deposits, the MCS and MCN. Both deposits have appreciable quantities of gold (Au), silver (Ag), and copper (Cu) associated with pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-arsenopyrite dominant stratabound replacement bodies interlayered with calcium-iron (Ca-Fe) amphibole which replace the calcareous portions of the interlayered calcareous to argillaceous schist unit. High angle discordant pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-arsenopyrite-spalerite-galena-boulangerite-pyrite-amphibole-calcite-quartz veins show open space textures and are proposed to represent the D2 hydrothermal fluid conduits connecting from the source pluton to the chemically responsive host rock trap. The highest gold and silver grades are associated with the junctions of the discordant veining and the calcareous schist with precious metal grade rapidly decreasing down dip, and gently tapering up dip. Two major discordant vein orientations, one generally striking E-W and dipping steeply N, and a second one striking NW-SE and dipping steeply N control the shape of the mineralized body, which is elongate in the E-W direction with a NW oriented tail. The intersection of these major discordant veins and secondary NE to N trending faults creates east dipping shoots which have localized and accentuated hydrothermal fluid flow.
| 6.4.1. | MINERALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS |
|---|
Gold, silver, and copper ore from the MCS and MCN deposits and is associated with sulfide mineralization largely within amphibole skarns in a complex folded geometry. Ore minerals include native gold, electrum, chalcopyrite, pyrargyrite (Ag3SbS3), acanthite (Ag2S), argentopyrite (AgFe2S3), and hessite (Ag2Te). Additional metals with anomalous values include bismuth (Bi), tellurium (Te), arsenic (As), antimony (Sb), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), and tungsten (W), which contrasts with the known Au-Bi-Te ± As metal associations of intrusive related deposits in Interior Alaska such as Fort Knox and Pogo mines (Flanigan et al., 2000). Metallurgical testing has been conducted with respect to the recovery of gold and silver by cyanidation and results suggest that the mineralization is amenable to recovery. Other metals and elements critical to the characterization of waste and process recovery of ore are characterized in the block model and discussed further in Sections 5.0, 8.0, and 9.0.
GOLD CHARACTERIZATION
Highest Au grades occur in dark green amphibole-rich skarn with coarse grained arsenopyrite and coarse-grained pyrrhotite typically with total sulfide content in the 5% to 15% range. In general, the higher the ratio of chalcopyrite to arsenopyrite, the lower the average Au grade. Gold is often in solid solution with Ag and Bi minerals. Gold grains are typically 10 µm to 1 mm in diameter. Coarser Au grains are more common in higher grade mineralization. Three samples from MCN and MCS had gold fineness ((Au wt% / (Au wt% + Ag wt%)) * 1000) ranging from 580 to 906 (Illig, 2015). An example reflected-light photomicrograph image of Au-amphibole skarn at the Manh Choh deposit is shown in Figure 6‑6 showing typical association but atypical angular morphology.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-4 |
|---|

FIGURE 6‑6 REFLECTED LIGHT PHOTOMICROGRAPH OF AU-AMPHIBOLOE SKARN

Note. po = pyrrhotite; cp = chalcopyrite.
SILVER CHARACTERIZATION
Significant Ag concentrations partly overlap both the Cu and Au zones at MCS and MCN. The partial overlap between Au and Ag reflects the wide variations in the Ag:Au ratio (>28,000 to <0.05) seen in deposit assays. Pyrargyrite, acanthite, argentopyrite, and lesser hessite are likely present in areas with high Ag:Au ratios. Gold and gold electrum contain silver commonly in areas with Au >> Ag. Silver grades tend to track more predictably with Au grades at MCN compared to MCS. Average Ag:Au ratio excluding detection limit samples is 97:1 at MCN, 136:1 at MCS, and 118:1 for the deposit areas. Within skarn mineralization, the average and median Ag:Au ratio is 110:1 and 8:1 respectively for the combined deposit areas.
COPPER CHARACTERIZATION
Copper at the MCS and MCN deposits is predominantly hosted in chalcopyrite (CuFeS2). Chalcopyrite is associated with pyrrhotite (Fe1-xS)
in disseminated and banded grains ranging from <0.1 mm to >1.0 cm. Native copper, bornite, chalcocite, and other copper bearing minerals are rare within the Manh Choh deposits. Au:Cu ratios typically increase from east to
west across both MCS and MCN with lowest ratios to the west in MCS. The higher copper content in portions of MCS contrast with lower concentrations in assay results at MCN. More discussion on the cyanidation of copper and its
characteristics relative to gold and silver recovery is provided in Section 10.0.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-5 |
|---|

PETROLOGY, MINERALOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY
Mineralogically, higher Au grades occur in skarn horizons containing coarse-grained euhedral amphibole and/or calcite, often in discordant, late structures. Illig (2015) describes some compositional zonation of the skarn and associated geochemistry.
Geochemical signature of a skarn horizon includes highly anomalous Au, Ag, As, Bi, Co, Cu, and sometimes anomalous Mo, Pb, Sn, or Te. Geochemical signature of potential plumbing features at the MCS and MCN deposits is characterized by high Ag, Sb, Pb, and Zn values with variable amounts of Au, As, Bi, Co, Cu, Mo, Sn and Te. In general, the MCN deposit average As, Bi, Pb, Sb, and Zn concentrations are higher than those of MCS. In contrast, MCS deposit Cu, P, and S concentrations are typically higher than those of MCN.
| 6.4.2. | MANH CHOH SOUTH DEPOSIT |
|---|
MCS is a largely unoxidized distal skarn hosted in recumbent folded calcareous schist and marble interbedded with amphibolite grade argillaceous schist and quartzite. A cross section through MCS is presented in Figure 6‑4. A penetrative foliation/axial planer cleavage characterizes the Chief Danny prospect, this cleavage is striking 150° and dipping 20°-30° SW. The numerous recumbent isoclinal folds measure 0.1 cm to 2.0 cm across the axis and form a composite overturned isoclinal fold shape with its axis sub parallel to the strike of foliation and opening to the NE. This larger composite fold body of calcareous schist, also opening to the NE, crops out at the surface, measures 200 m vertically and 300 m horizontally in cross section. In long section, the fold measures just over 500 m. The calcareous schist body is dissected by three to four high angle NE-SW trending normal faults which display offsets of 2 m to 10 m, appear to be post-mineralization in age, and have a periodicity of 100 m along the strike of the folded calcareous schist body. The eastern edge of the composite fold is proposed to be truncated by the B1 fault, a N-NE striking, moderately east dipping (45°-50°) reverse fault, also of D2 age. At least one NW striking, sub-vertical fault, thought to be a D2 feeder zone, can be traced along the long axis of the mineralization. This fault is characterized by +100 g/t Ag values associated with highly anomalous Pb, Sb, and Zn with the highest-grade concentration of these metals in the extreme SE portion of the MCS deposit.
Gold, silver, and copper mineralization is associated with pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-arsenopyrite dominant strata bound replacement bodies interlayered with Ca-Fe amphibole dominant gangue which has replaced the calcareous portions of the interlayered calc-schist units. High angle discordant pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-arsenopyrite-spalerite-galena-boulangerite-pyrite-amphibole-calcite-quartz veins show open space textures and are thought to represent the hydrothermal fluid conduits connecting the source plutonic system to the chemically responsive host rock. The highest Au and Ag grades are associated with the junctions of the discordant veining and the calcareous schist with precious metal grade rapidly decreasing down dip, and gently tapering up dip. Two major discordant vein orientations have been identified at MCS one generally striking E-W dipping steeply to the north (the 275 fault), the other striking NW-SE and dipping steeply north (the 305 fault). Combined, these two feeder systems control the shape of the mineralized body, which is elongate in the E-W direction with a NW oriented tail. The intersection of these major discordant veins and secondary N-E to N trending faults creates east dipping shoots which have localized and accentuated hydrothermal fluid flow. As is true at the MCN resource, the eastern portion of these feeders returned significantly higher Ag grades (>100 g/t) associated with higher Pb, Sb and Zn, possibly indicating a higher temperature and fluid flow regime on the extreme SE end of the MCS resource.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-6 |
|---|

| 6.4.3. | MANH CHOH NORTH DEPOSIT |
|---|
MCN is a largely oxidized distal skarn hosted in recumbent folded calcareous schist and marble interbedded with amphibolite grade argillaceous schist and quartzite. A significant portion of the MCN resource area is oxidized to depths in excess of 50 m below surface, resulting in widespread Fe, Cu, and As oxides. This strong, pervasive oxidation destroyed the magnetic and conductive pyrrhotite-arsenopyrite-chalcopyrite skarn mineralization, resulting in geophysical signatures unlike those over the unoxidized MCS zone. A cross section through MCN is presented in Figure 6‑4.
A penetrative foliation/axial planer cleavage characterizes the Chief Danny prospect, striking 150° and dipping 20° to 30° to the SW. The numerous recumbent isoclinal folds measure 0.1 m to 2.0 m across the axis and form a larger composite overturned isoclinal fold shape with its axis subparallel to the strike of foliation and opening to the SW. This composite fold body of calcareous schist measures 150 m vertically and 100 m horizontally in cross section. In long section, the fold measures just over 270 m over the NW portion of the resource and is proposed to have had the upper limb and hinge eroded in the SE portion of the resource. The calcareous schist body is dissected by four to five high angle NE-SW trending normal D3 faults which display offsets of 2 m to 10 m, appear to be post-mineralization in age, and have a periodicity of 100 m along the strike of the folded calcareous schist body. The eastern edge of the resource area is proposed to be truncated by the B1 fault, a N-NE striking, moderately east dipping (45° to 50°) reverse D3 fault.
Gold, silver, and copper mineralization is associated with pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-arsenopyrite dominant strata bound replacement bodies interlayered with Ca-Fe amphibole dominant gangue which has replaced the calcareous portions of the interlayered calc-schist units in the NW half of the resource. The weathering product of this mineralization, dominated by hematite, limonite, goethite, and scorodite-rich clays, make up a significant portion of the SE resource area. High angle discordant pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-arsenopyrite-spalerite-galena-boulangerite-pyrite-amphibole-calcite-quartz veins show open space textures and are thought to represent the D2 hydrothermal fluid conduits connecting the source plutonic system to the chemically responsive host rock. The highest Au and Ag grades are associated with the junctions of the discordant veining and the calcareous schist with precious metal grade rapidly decreasing down dip, and gently tapering up dip. At least two steeply dipping, NW striking D2 feeder faults have been identified within the MCN zone, the 125 and 110 faults, named for their strike directions. As in the MCS zone, the eastern portion of these feeders returned significantly higher Ag grades (>100 g/t) associated with higher Pb, Sb and Zn, possibly indicating a higher temperature and fluid flow regime on the extreme SE end of the MCN resource.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-7 |
|---|

| 6.5. | DEPOSIT TYPE |
|---|
Exploration results from 2009 through 2018 revealed the presence of a distinctive suite of elements, sulfide minerals, and alteration minerals at the MCN, MCS, and Discovery zones that do not match the typical characteristics of an intrusive related gold system but do share several diagnostic characteristics of distal reduced gold-copper-silver skarns and the larger porphyry copper systems with which such skarns are sometimes associated.
Petrologic data from Deininger (2012) and Illig (2015) confirmed the rare presence of remnant prograde skarn minerals (hedenbergite and wollastonite). The most pervasive and often abundant alteration assemblage associated with gold-sulfide mineralization, however, is amphibole and chlorite, a mineral assemblage normally associated with retrograde skarn alteration. This evidence suggests the highest temperatures reached during silicate alteration were stable for amphibole and chlorite but temperatures rarely reached levels where true prograde skarn minerals were stable. From a strictly technical standpoint, amphibole at MCS and MCN is a prograde mineral, however, to avoid confusion of the reader, the terms “prograde” and “retrograde” will not be used in this report except in places where their use is defined and in compliance with the commonly understood technical meaning of these two terms.
New Pb-isotope data from the deposit area plots in a zone with other replacement / vein style mineral deposits with 206Pb / 204Pb ratios in the 19.1 to 19.2 range and 207Pb/204Pb ratios in the 15.64 to 15.68 range (Illig, 2015). The deposit area Pb-isotope data are considerably more radiogenic than Devonian-Mississippian volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits that are common to the west in the Delta Mining District. Lead isotope data from Cretaceous and Tertiary plutonic rocks in the Yukon Tanana Terrane plot in a similar range to the deposit area samples and other skarn samples from Eastern Interior Alaska, leading Newberry et al. (1997) to conclude that the source of lead for Yukon Tanana Terrane skarns was plutonic.
In September 2013, noted economic geologist Richard Sillitoe conducted a two-day site visit to the Project and agreed with the previously drawn conclusion that the gold-rich mineralization at Manh Choh was part of a reduced gold skarn system within a larger porphyry copper setting (Sillitoe, 2013). Additional evidence supporting the presence of a larger porphyry copper-gold system includes:
| • | 35 km^2^ of anomalous copper, gold and pathfinder element soil sample geochemistry zoned from a copper-gold enriched core<br> to arsenic-lead-zinc-manganese enriched rim; |
|---|---|
| • | A-type quartz magnetite veins observed in a crowded quartz monzonite porphyry intrusive in drill hole TET11006 on Mohawk Ridge; and |
| --- | --- |
| • | A metal and mineral suite similar to well-known distal gold skarn deposits in other parts of the world. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-8 |
| --- | --- |

The link to a porphyry copper system was further strengthened by trace element work conducted by Illig (2015). On a plot of Y/Sr compared to SiO2 content, the MCS skarn at Manh Choh plots clearly in the porphyry copper field with other well-known examples such as Bingham Canyon, Yanacocha, Batu Hijau, Pebble and similar age porphyries in the adjacent Yukon Territory.
Sillitoe (2013) suggested that the Manh Choh zone alteration and mineralization most closely resembles the gold-sulfide skarn deposits mined at the Fortitude deposit in the Battle Mountain Mining District of central Nevada. Figure 6‑7 illustrates the location of the Manh Choh Project within an idealized model of a hydrothermal system.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-9 |
|---|

FIGURE 6‑7 LOCATION OF MANH CHOH DEPOSIT WITHIN AN IDEALIZED
MODEL OF A HYDROTHERMAL SYSTEM

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 6-10 |
|---|

| 7. | EXPLORATION |
|---|---|
| 7.1. | EXPLORATION |
| --- | --- |
| 7.1.1. | SUMMARY |
| --- | --- |
A Lease to explore Tetlin Village tribal lands was secured in June 2008. Prior to the Lease, the authors are not aware of any detailed geologic exploration conducted on the lease (see subsection 5.2.1). Initial reconnaissance consisting of surface sampling, trenching, and geophysics occurred on the Lease during 2009 and 2010. Drill testing followed in 2011, testing several prospects, including Discovery and the northernmost edge of MCN.
During the 2012 drilling campaign, the discovery drill hole at MCS was completed along with six drill hole fences and fans. During 2013, an extensive infill drilling program was conducted at MCS deposit, defining the bulk of resource. Following the 2013 program, Contango published its first resource estimate for the MCS and MCN deposits (Giroux, 2013b). This resource estimate included data from 130 drill holes totaling 27,767 m for diamond core drilling. The resource estimate is not considered compliant with Canadian National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
Contango initiated a process to market for sale its interest in the Tetlin Project. Numerous companies visited the Project in 2014. As a consequence, no field operations were conducted during 2014. This process resulted in Royal Alaska, LLC, a subsidiary of Royal Gold, and Core Alaska, LLC, a subsidiary of Contango, entering into a joint venture agreement for Peak Gold in 2015.
The 2015 field program included additional infill drilling at the western extent of MCS and the first systematic grid drilling at MCN. Follow-up drilling at North in 2016 and 2017 expanded the resource and roughly defined the extent of the orebody.
Tucson based Independent Mining Consultants, Inc (IMC) was selected to complete a resource update in 2017. In June 2017 a mineral resource update on the MCS and MCN deposits (IMC, 2017) was completed using drilling data available. The resource estimate is considered compliant with Canadian National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
Additional exploration drilling occurred during 2018 and 2019 tested for potential extensions to the resource and tested targets outside of the immediate deposit area. Drilling during 2020 and 2021 included resource and development drilling and exploration drilling within 5 km of the deposit area.
Exploration activities have employed a number of methods to test the area including:
| • | 1:250,000 geologic mapping completed by Foster (1970) |
|---|---|
| • | Rock chip mapping derived from grid-based top of bedrock soil auger sampling |
| --- | --- |
| • | Trench, road cut and drill pad geologic mapping |
| --- | --- |
| • | Stream sediment, pan concentrate, soil, and rock sampling |
| --- | --- |
| • | Airborne and ground-based geophysics |
| --- | --- |
| • | Diamond core drilling |
| --- | --- |
Further details on exploration at MCS, MCN, and MCW are provided in the following sections, summarized from JDS (2018).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-1 |
|---|

| 7.1.2. | MANH CHOH SOUTH EXPLORATION |
|---|
The MCS deposit area is located 250 m N-NW of VABM Tetling approximately 15 km S-SE of Tok Junction and measures 600 m in the E-W direction and 220 m in the N-S direction within the Tintana Gold Belt.
Following delineation of anomalous gold and pathfinder metals in rock, soil, stream sediment, and pan concentrate samples in 2009 and 2010, the MCS deposit was discovered by drilling an Au-As-Cu soil auger anomaly in June 2012. Drill holes TET12016-12019 targeted a NW-SE oriented elevated gold-in-soil anomaly; the four drill holes were placed to create a crossed scissors section to test either a NE or SW dip to mineralization. Holes TET12016-12017 were angled at -50° and -70° to the NE and holes 12018-12019 were offset 15 m to the NW, drilled at -50° and -70° to the SW. From the collar to 114 m downhole, TET12016 intercepted stratiform disseminated to massive pyrrhotite, arsenopyrite, and chalcopyrite mineralization hosted in stratiform semi-massive to massive amphibole-chlorite skarn. Drill holes TET12017-12019 returned similar results and defined a steep NE dip to the mineralized body, while the host stratigraphy displayed foliation dipping shallowly to the SW. After assay results of core samples from drill holes TET12016-12019 confirmed the presence of high-grade gold mineralization (1.51 to 845 gram-meters), a series of three-hole fans of -50°, -70°, and -90° were drilled at 100 m step outs from the two fences of scissor holes. Two fences were drilled to the SE and three to the NW. This drill program allowed for the initial 2012 resource estimate (Giroux, 2013a).
The 2013 drill program was designed to upgrade the Inferred Resource to the Indicated level. Drilling was laid out at a nominal 30 m spacing between 225° azimuth, -60° inclination holes as well as between fences. This drill program allowed for the second MCS resource estimate (Giroux, 2013b). The 2015 drill program at MCS extended the resource to the west and explored the depth extent with two 1,000 m deep drill holes. During 2016, four cardinal direction-oriented drill holes were completed to test the resource integrity between fences. These holes showed good correlation with previously modeled mineralization and mineralized intervals from these holes were used for metallurgical testing. A total of 106 drill holes totaling 23,027 m have been completed in the MCS resource area.
Limited drilling to the east of the MCS resource suggests decreasing gold grades although drill density on the eastern end of the MCS resource is sparce. The down-dip portion of the lower fold limb, heading NE, has not been drilled extensively due to its depth below surface and the lower gold grade returned from the few drill holes that have tested it. It is proposed that the lower limb of the folded calcareous unit may join the mineralized MCN folded calcareous unit and that there may be undiscovered D2 feeder structures which would act as fluid conduits to create additional precious metal mineralization between the MCS and MCN resource areas.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-2 |
|---|

Extensive drilling in 2016 and 2017 on the western extension of the MCS resource revealed the presence of the N-S striking, shallow east dipping B2 reverse fault. This post-mineral D3-age fault truncates the western end of the MCS zone and juxtaposes it with a thick, distinctive purple-green colored calc-schist unit which contains thinner, lower-grade gold zones characterized by extremely low arsenic values. Potential for MCS grade-thickness intervals is present in the footwall of the B2 fault, known as the Manh Choh West Extension, including hole TET17379 which returned 8.16 m grading 5.22 g/t Au starting at 103.24 m and an additional 29.1 m grading 2.53 g/t Au starting at 116.6 m. Continuity of grade and thickness, however, could not be established during grid-based 2017 drilling.
| 7.1.3. | MANH CHOH NORTH EXPLORATION |
|---|
The MCN deposit area is located 650 m N of VABM Tetling (elevation 1,019.5 m) and measures 540 m in the SE-NW direction and at its maximum is 180 m wide in the NE-SW direction.
The MCN zone was originally targeted with limited drilling in 2011 (hole 11010) and several follow-up holes in 2013, all of which were targeted on anomalous gold and pathfinder anomalies in top of bedrock soil samples in the resource area. In addition, construction of the main project access road exposed several areas of highly oxidized gossan that contained iron, arsenic, and copper oxides in rock samples. Geophysical modeling of both airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys as well as ground dipole-dipole IP surveys was completed prior to the 2015 field season and revealed coincident airborne magnetic highs and resistivity lows that were coincident with NW trending Au-Cu-As soil anomalies. Magnetic and resistivity anomalies at MCN were weaker than those at MCS and these lower responses were deemed unfavorable indicators of gold skarn mineralization.
Drilling completed in 2015 revealed several significant grade-thickness intervals, culminating in discovery hole 153 which intercepted 22.72 m grading 9.38 g/t Au starting at 10.2 m and an additional 13.29 m grading 6.52 g/t Au starting at 42.06 m. Follow-up drilling conducted in the Phase 1 2016 winter drilling program expanded the MCN mineralization over 200 m to the SE and revealed significant gold mineralization that cropped out at the paleo-surface and was masked only by two to four metres of aeolian silt. Infill and expansion drilling continued at MCN through Phases 2 and 3 drilling programs in 2016 and culminated in the Phase 1 2017 drill program that resulted in the updated resource estimate by IMC (2017).
Potential for expansion of the MCN deposit outside of the current resource area exists down dip to the SW along mineralized carbonate beds toward an area known as Middle Earth where favorable horizons are correlated with those within the MCN deposit area. Hole 12033 intercepted 14.02 m grading 1.36 g/t Au starting at 248.41 m and an additional 12.19 m grading 3.62 g/t Au starting at 268.53 m. Hole 15148 was subsequently drilled to confirm the suggested south-dipping geometry of this area and intercepted 5.84 m grading 4.63 g/t Au starting at 229.6 m and 3.00 m grading 1.84 g/t Au starting at 240.84 m. These intervals fell below the $1,400/oz gold pit bottom modeled during the IMC resource estimation so no further drilling has been conducted at Middle Earth and the relationship between it and the North Peak or Main Peak zones remains uncertain.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-3 |
|---|

| 7.1.4. | MANH CHOH SOUTH AND NORTH GEOCHEMICAL SIGNATURE |
|---|
Both the MCS and MCN deposits have unique geochemical signatures. The soil geochemical data shows elevated Au-As-Cu-Bi as well as other elements. These elements along with the airborne magnetic and electromagnetic data have been combined into a prospectivity analysis for the Chief Danny area. Figure 7‑1 shows the results of combining leveled and normalized values for Au + Cu + Bi + Reduced to Pole (RTP) Magnetics + 900 Hz electromagnetic data. Each dataset has been leveled to a scale from 1 to 10 and summed to obtain a total prospectivity value. Zones of the highest prospectivity value are at the MCS and MCN deposits. Other targets highlighted in the prospectivity analysis are the extensions to the NW from MCN at True Blue Moon and Waterpump. Other areas highlighted include Discovery, Saddle, and 8 O’clock. Exploration and limited diamond drilling have concentrated on these target areas within the Chief Danny area.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-4 |
|---|

FIGURE 7‑1 CHIEF DANNY DISTRICT PROSPECTIVITY ANALYSIS

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-5 |
|---|

| 7.1.5. | MANH CHOH SOUTH AND NORTH GEOPHYSICAL SIGNATURE |
|---|
Both the MCS and MCN deposits have unique geophysical characteristics that help define the mineralized bodies. The characteristic signature has been used for additional exploration targeting. The key characteristics are that both deposits are located on annular three dimensional (3D) magnetic chimney-like structures and have a bulls-eye target of IP conductivity high that in the case of MCS sits on and below the deposit and at MCN sits below the deposit.
Figure 7‑2 shows a cross-section of the MCS deposit with a slice of the 3D magnetic isograde shells (red contours) with gridded IP chargeability. The 3D magnetic shell was derived from UBC inversion of the Dighem RTP-TMI magnetic data (Condor 2016). The IP data is from the Quantec pole-dipole ground survey and was gridded by Peak Gold JV. Figure 7‑3 is a cross-section for the MCN deposit that shows a similar 3D inversion magnetic chimney-like feature with a strong IP conductivity anomaly. The deposit itself sits above the conductivity anomaly presumably because of the deeper oxidation level at MCN versus the limited near surface oxidation level at MCS.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-6 |
|---|

FIGURE 7‑2 MANH CHOH SOUTH DEPOSIT CROSS-SECTION 9735 ORIENTED
045° - MAG AND IP CHARGEABILITY

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-7 |
|---|

FIGURE 7‑3 MANH CHOH NORTH DEPOSIT CROSS-SECTION 10030
ORIENTED 045° - MAG AND IP CHARGEABILITY

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-8 |
|---|

| 7.1.6. | MANH CHOH WEST EXPLORATION |
|---|
The Manh Choh West (MCW) deposit area is located 550 m NW of VABM Tetling and is believed to be geologically contiguous with the MCS resource area. Insufficient drilling has been completed to confirm or negate this supposition, so the MCW area is treated as a separate mineralized area for purposes of this report. Known gold mineralization at MCW measures 120 m NW-SE and 60 m SW-NE. Drilling intercepted gold mineralization both above and below the B2 fault, a N-NE striking moderately E dipping (45°-50°) D3-age reverse fault.
First drilled in 2012, auriferous skarn mineralization in MCW is generally less sulfide mineral rich than the Main Peak resource area and contains significantly lower arsenic values. Drill holes TET12047-049 contained multi-gram gold grades for multiple meters in an upper skarn zone that returned a combined 54 gram-meters of significant drill intercepts (14 m to 78 m down hole). Follow-up drilling in 2016 defined an upper hangingwall mineralized body and a lower footwall mineralized body related to the N-NE striking moderately east dipping (45°-50°) B2 reverse fault. Drill hole sets TET16217-16219, 16262, 16263, 16264, 16265, and 16273 traced the two zones of mineralization to the NW.
Unlike the MCS and MCN resource areas, there is no host rock fold structure or hinge thickening apparent at MCW. The B2 fault was identified as a post-mineral D3 fault with a clear IP chargeability signature, most likely the result of the white-yellow unoxidized clay-rich gouge which marks the trace of the B2 fault. Calcareous host rock is present above and below the B2 fault. The MCS 305 and 275 D2 plumbing structures are cut by and appear to be offset by the D3-age B2 fault with an apparent west-side down motion (Figure 7‑4).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-9 |
|---|

FIGURE 7‑4 MANH CHOH WEST RESOURCE TARGET AREA

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-10 |
|---|

| 7.1.7 | EXPLORATION<br> POTENTIAL |
|---|
During the 2012 through 2019 exploration programs, several areas of the greater Chief Danny area were explored by soil auger sampling, rock sampling, magnetic and electromagnetic airborne geophysics, IP and/or Titan 24 DCIP/MT geophysics, and core drilling. The exploration targets include the Discovery, 7 O’clock, 8 O’clock, 2 O’clock, Saddle, North Saddle, Tors, Moons, Waterpump, and Forks zones.
Contango began top of bedrock soil auger sampling in 2010, and continued that work in subsequent years, expanding the soil grid. The result of this work is a remarkably consistent multi-element anomaly, zoned from a copper-rich core, grading outward through a gold-copper zone where the MCS and MCN resources are located, then copper-gold-arsenic and rimmed by lead-zinc-antimony-manganese (Figure 7‑5 and Figure 7‑6).
FIGURE 7‑5 INVERSE DISTANCE GRID OF GOLD IN SOILS, CHIEF DANNY AREA

Other metallic elements of interest, such as silver, bismuth, cobalt, tungsten, manganese and iron, show more irregular patterns that are not as easily explained when compared with gold, copper, arsenic, lead, and zinc. In general, higher gold values tend to have higher bismuth and arsenic values associated with them while copper tends to be associated with anomalous silver and iron (Figure 7‑6).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-11 |
|---|

FIGURE 7‑6 INVERSE DISTANCE GRID OF COPPER, ARSENIC, LEAD, AND ZINC IN SOILS, CHIEF DANNY AREA

Initial drill targets in the Chief Danny area were identified with soil sampling. Subsequent airborne and ground geophysics and over 80,000 m of diamond core drilling have generated a series of exploration characteristics that allow both pre-drill targeting and post-drill refinement of near-resource targets. These two phases of drill targeting are summarized as follows.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-12 |
|---|

PRE-DRILLING SKARN INDICATORS:
| 1. | Most gold-bearing skarn mineralization is magnetic and conductive<br> because pyrrhotite is the dominant sulfide and causes a positive magnetic response and a negative resistivity response. |
|---|---|
| 2. | The Calculated Vertical Gradient (CVG) product of the airborne<br> magnetic survey emphasizes the magnetic response from the upper 500 m of bedrock, and therefore is the most useful for drill<br> targeting of pyrrhotite-dominant gold skarn. Chimney-like magnetic highs occur immediately below the MCS and MCN resource<br> areas. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Airborne resistivity has a penetration depth of less than 100 m, and<br> is attenuated by the first conductor it encounters, therefore this tool will only identify very shallow conductors. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Plumbing structures are linear, high angle features, and may be clay<br> and/or pyrrhotite rich resulting in low resistivity response in IP surveys. A moderate to weak chargeability high caused by<br> disseminated peripheral pyrrhotite/pyrite may form adjacent to an IP resistivity low. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Coincident IP chargeability highs with IP resistivity lows are most<br> likely unmineralized clay-altered shear or gouge zones. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Elevated soil gold or pathfinders (particularly arsenic) occur only<br> where skarn or plumbing-related mineralization is exposed at the surface. Even one meter of barren QMS overlying mineralization<br> will prevent a gold-pathfinder response in soils. Soils cannot be used as a condemnation tool. |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | Elevated soil gold or pathfinders may occur with little or no<br> magnetic or resistivity response due to +50 m thick bedrock oxidation zone that has destroyed magnetic minerals and degraded or<br> destroyed magnetic and resistivity responses. |
| --- | --- |
In summary, the best pre-drilling targets are chimney-like CVG highs, coincident with small IP resistivity lows, which are coincident with linear soil sample anomalies containing elevated gold plus pathfinder elements.
POST-DRILLING INDICATORS:
| 1. | Highest gold grades occur in dark green amphibole-rich skarn with<br> coarse grained arsenopyrite and coarse-grained pyrrhotite. Visible gold is rare. |
|---|---|
| 2. | The higher the arsenopyrite content, the more likely the interval<br> will contain high-grade gold, however, extremely high arsenic grades can occur in gold-poor zones. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | The higher the ratio of chalcopyrite to arsenopyrite, the lower<br> the average gold grade |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | The highest gold grades occur in rock with total sulfide<br> percentages ranging from 5% to 15%. Lower gold values occur at <5% total sulfide percentages, although lower gold also<br> occurs at extremely high sulfide percentages (>20%). |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Higher gold grades often occur in skarn horizons containing<br> coarse-grained euhedral amphibole and/or calcite, often in discordant, late structures. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Geochemical signature of a skarn horizon includes highly anomalous<br> gold, silver, arsenic, bismuth, cobalt, and copper and sometimes anomalous molybdenum, lead, tin, or tellurium. |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | Geochemical signature of a plumbing feature includes extremely<br> high silver, tin, lead, and zinc with highly variable amounts of gold, arsenic, bismuth, cobalt, copper, molybdenum, tin, and<br> tellurium. |
| --- | --- |
| 8. | Higher grade-thickness intervals are more likely to occur up-dip<br> of a plumbing feature than downdip below a plumbing feature. |
| --- | --- |
| 9. | Plumbing structures tend to strike to the NW and dip steeply<br> to the NE or SW. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-13 |
| --- | --- |

In summary, the QP has reviewed the exploration information and concurs that the best post-drilling targets occur up-dip of discordant plumbing features in dark green amphibole-rich skarn with coarse-grained arsenopyrite and pyrrhotite, high pyrrhotite:chalcopyrite ratios, total sulfide volumes ranging from 5% to 15%, coarse-grained euhedral amphibole and/or calcite, low levels of lead, antimony, and zinc, and silver values generally below 34 g/t.
The QP believes that there is good exploration potential at the Manh Choh Project between the MCS and MCN deposits. This area was drill tested in 2022 and could potentially expand or add to the Mineral Resource inventory. There is additional gold-silver exploration potential as outlined by the geochemistry in Figure 7‑5 along the numerous mineralized trends, including the MCS, MCN, Discovery, and Saddle trends.
| 7.2. | DRILLING |
|---|
There is no evidence of exploration drilling on the Project prior to 2011.
A total of 530 diamond core holes comprising 100,822 m have been completed on the Project between 2011 and December 2022. An annual drilling summary is presented in Table 7‑1. A drill hole plan is presented in Figure 7‑7 Drill Hole Plan.
TABLE 7‑1 SUMMARY OF DRILL HOLES FROM THE MANH CHOH PROJECT
| Year | Company | Number of Holes | Length<br><br> (ft) | Total<br><br> (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Contango/Juneau | 11 | 8,056 | 2,456 |
| 2012 | Contango/Juneau | 50 | 36,004 | 10,974 |
| 2013 | Contango/Juneau | 69 | 47,025 | 14,333 |
| 2015 | Royal Gold/Contango Peak Gold LLC | 61 | 46,126 | 14,059 |
| 2016 | Royal Gold/Contango Peak Gold LLC | 119 | 67,332 | 20,523 |
| 2017 | Royal Gold/Contango Peak Gold LLC | 107 | 59,344 | 18,088 |
| 2018 | Royal Gold/Contango Peak Gold LLC | 28 | 21,179 | 6,455 |
| 2019 | Royal Gold/Contango Peak Gold LLC | 4 | 5,811 | 1,771 |
| 2020 | KGMA/Contango Peak Gold LLC | 13 | 4,589 | 1,399 |
| 2021 | KGMA/Contango Peak Gold LLC | 59 | 28,822 | 8,785 |
| 2022 | KGMA/Contango Peak Gold LLC | 9 | 6,493 | 1,979 |
| Total | 530 | 330,781 | 100,822 |
As of the resource reporting cut-off date (December 31, 2022), a total of 53,400 valid assay intervals were available for 521 diamond drill holes for a total of 324,288 ft (98,843 m) of diamond drilling. The remaining nine drill hole intervals were not validated as of the cut-off date and were still pending but are added in Table 7-1 to show the entire drill footages.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-14 |
|---|

FIGURE 7‑7 DRILL HOLE PLAN

| 7.2.1. | DRILLING METHODS AND<br> EQUIPMENT |
|---|
Drilling from 2011 to 2022 at the Project was primarily diamond core HQ diameter (63.5 m/2.5 in.). A number of NQ2 diameter (50.7 mm/2.00 in.) drill holes were completed in 2011, 2015, 2017, and 2018. Select drill holes were started with PQ (85 mm) diameter and reduced to HQ diameter or drilled entirely as PQ to improve near surface recoveries in 2016, 2017, and 2018. NQ2 and PQ diameter drilling accounts for less than 5% of the total drilling. The majority of annual drill campaigns were completed during May to October months. Drilling activities in 2016 through 2021 were largely conducted on a 24-hour per day, 7-day per week basis.
The majority of 2011 to 2019 drilling was completed using a combination of a road-supported Atlas-Copco CS14 wheel mounted drill rig and a CS1000 fly-capable drill rig. Drilling in 2020 and 2021 was completed with Boart Longyear LF90 track-mounted drills.
The following drilling contractors have been used at the Project since 2011:
| • | 2011-2012 - Connors Drilling of Montrose, Colorado |
|---|---|
| • | 2013 - CNC Drilling of Fairbanks, Alaska and Connors Drilling |
| --- | --- |
| • | 2015 - CNC Drilling and First Drilling of Montrose, Colorado |
| --- | --- |
| • | 2016-2019 - CNC Drilling |
| --- | --- |
| • | 2020 - Boart Longyear of Salt Lake City, Utah |
| --- | --- |
| • | 2021 - Ruen Drilling of Clark Fork, Idaho |
| --- | --- |
| • | 2022 - T&J Drilling of Arlee, Montana |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-15 |
| --- | --- |

| 7.2.2. | COLLAR AND DOWNHOLE SURVEYS |
|---|
Drill locations are initially set using handheld global positioning system (GPS) units. High precision surveys are completed periodically during the drill program. All of the drill holes used for the MCS and MCN resource have been precision surveyed.
Collar surveys through August 2016 were found to have a consistent error of less than 2 m due to survey control mis-location. The control was corrected and all collar coordinates adjusted and corrected prior to estimation of current Mineral Resources.
The surveys through 2019 were completed using Leica RTK survey equipment in UTM meters. Surveys in 2020 and 2021 were completed using Trimble RTK equipment in UTM meters. In 2021, all collected data including collar and downhole surveys were transformed to Alaska State Plane using US Survey feet units. The acQuire database with all associated logged data retains UTM Zone 7N coordinate system. The Project coordinate system details are:
| • | Coordinate System: UTM Zone 7 North |
|---|---|
| • | Datum: NAD 83 |
| --- | --- |
| • | Vertical Datum: NAVD88 |
| --- | --- |
| • | Geoid: AK Geoid 12B |
| --- | --- |
Site visits by the QP have included visits to historic drill locations to verify collar positions. All drill holes visited were monumented and properly located relative to topography and other drill holes. Three collar locations for TET12020, TET12021, and TET19448 were re-surveyed in 2021 to confirm elevation coordinates relative to adjacent drill holes showing approximately 3 m to 5 m (10 ft to 15 ft) of variance. Elevations were not adjusted for the resource estimation. The expected impact is less than 0.1% to resource inventory as TET19448 was drilled entirely outside mineralization and TET12020 and TET12021 have low gold grade mineralization at the northern extents of MCN. Table 7‑2 shows the expected changes to collar location elevations for the three holes.
TABLE 7‑2 2021 COLLAR VERIFICATION RESULTS
| HoleID | Original X | Original Y | Original<br><br> <br>Z | SPCS83_<br><br> <br>TRANS_X | SPCS83_<br><br> <br>TRANS_Y | SPCS83_<br><br> <br>TRANS_Z | Collar<br><br> <br>Elevation<br><br> <br>Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TET12020 | 1,492,900.623 | 3,358,701.578 | 3,225.518 | 1,492,900.623 | 3,358,701.578 | 3,209.580 | (15.938) |
| TET12021 | 1,492,905.515 | 3,358,705.658 | 3,225.158 | 1,492,905.515 | 3,358,705.658 | 3,209.836 | (15.321) |
| TET19448 | 1,493,709.675 | 3,357,175.022 | 3,166.004 | 1,493,709.675 | 3,357,175.022 | 3,177.070 | 11.066 |
Note. Alaska State Plane Zone 2 grid coordinates in US Survey feet.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-16 |
|---|

In 2021, survey control monuments and verification were completed by a professionally licensed surveyor with Lounsbury & Associates, Inc. confirming coordinate details for the Project.
Downhole surveys were completed for each drill hole to measure variation in orientation. Downhole surveys were conducted by the drilling contractors at specified downhole intervals while drilling and typically used a REFLEX EZ magnetic probe attached to the drill rig wireline. In 2021, select holes were surveyed with a REFLEX Gyro Sprint tool representing approximately 5% of all downhole surveys recorded.
Downhole surveys are collected in the field in hard copy and collated by geology staff in Microsoft (MS) Excel compilations corrected for average magnetic declination during drilling. Measurement data is visualized and compared to neighboring surveys for quality control. Some pyrrhotite-bearing measurement data were excluded based on deviation from expected hole trace and magnetic intensity. In 2021, a KGMA review of historic excluded downhole survey data confirmed the selected exclusions. Magnetic declination was revised for all drill data based on month and year drilled to better constrain true azimuth of historic data in acQuire.
| 7.2.3. | RECOVERY |
|---|
The style of mineralization and host rocks at the MCS and MCN deposits require careful collection of downhole core samples to ensure acceptable recoveries. Drilling samples were collected using a triple-tube method to minimize core loss. Recovery measured at the core shack during logging compares core length to drill interval length and is stated as a percent. Average and median core recovery for Manh Choh are 90% and 96% respectively.
Previous reports have discussed the occurrences of lower recoveries in HQ diameter core samples particularly in near-surface oxidation and at MCN. Local PQ diameter twin holes of HQ diameter drilling oxide zones were completed when HQ diameter recoveries were below 80% to ensure acceptable and representative sample volumes were collected for drilled intervals. Intervals with calculated recovery greater than 100% or consistently below 75% were evaluated.
| 7.2.4. | DEPOSIT DRILLING |
|---|
Since 2017, drilling at the Project has consisted of angled diamond core holes. Seven RC water well holes were drilled in 2021.
The 2011 drilling program focused on the Discovery prospect 500 m SW of MCS but included three holes targeting the MCS and MCN prospects. The majority of subsequent drilling was at MCS, MCW (subset of MCS), and MCN with over 72,000 m (236,000 ft) of drilling from 403 drill holes, constituting 73% of all Project drilling. Initial definition drilling was completed at MCS in 2013 and 2015 on approximately 30 m (100 ft) spaced section lines with most holes angled 225° SW perpendicular to overall NE dipping mineralization. Major deposit drilling at MCN occurred in 2015 through 2017 infilling 30 m (100 ft) spaced section lines with most holes angled 45° NE perpendicular to overall SW dipping mineralization. An infill program at MCS and MCN was completed during 2021 targeting gaps in previous drilling.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-17 |
|---|

| 7.2.5. | LOGGING PROCEDURES |
|---|
Drill core was transported from the drill sites to the core shack in Tok Junction via helicopter or truck in the morning and evening. When the core arrived at the core shack, it was washed and laid out on tables, and drill recovery and rock quality designation (RQD) was measured and recorded (Figure 7‑8 and Figure 7‑9). Beginning in 2020 expanded geotechnical parameters were added to the standard logging procedure to capture additional hardness and fracture information. During logging, the core was written on with chinagraph markers to identify important features by the logging geologist and these features are visible during photographing of the core.
FIGURE 7‑8 CORE LOGGING FACILITY IN TOK, TETLIN PROJECT, ALASKA

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-18 |
|---|

FIGURE 7‑9 EXAMPLE OF SPLIT CORE PRIOR TO SAMPLING, TETLIN PROJECT, ALASKA

In 2011 and 2012, all logging data was recorded using Coreview logging software running on Toshiba netbooks. Starting in 2013, all logging data was recorded using MS Excel on a template designed by Avalon Development, specifically for logging the Tetlin Project drill core. The MS Excel logging template was modified in 2015 to include more features prevalent at both MCS and MCN such as skarn alteration. Logging includes collar, prospect, lithology, alteration, mineralization, structural vein and fault intervals, sample intervals, and comment annotations at the geologist’s discretion. Geologists and geotechnicians also complete linear core length recovery, RQD, and density measurements. Implementation of an acQuire database for active logging into the database began in 2021.
After the core was logged it was photographed and stacked for cutting. Core was split in half lengthwise, and one side of split core sampled. The half the core that was not sampled remains in the core box and is stored in wooden boxes, under permanent cover, in Tok. In 2013 and 2015, prior to the core boxes being stored, geotechnicians took readings every 50 cm over the entire hole with a GDD Inc. MPP- EM2S+ Multi Parameter Probe (MPP). The MPP records magnetic susceptibility, conductivity (MHOS/M), and conductor response (Hz).
Sample interval blocks are placed by the logger, leaving every tenth sample number open for blanks and standards. Full sample bags were stacked in polyvinyl super-sacks and stored at the core shack warehouse until they were dispatched to Fairbanks for assay.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-19 |
|---|

| 7.3. | GEOTECHNICAL,<br> HYDROLOGICAL AND METALLURGICAL DRILLING |
|---|
All core drilled on the Tetlin Project in 2013 was oriented using the Reflex ACT II RD orientation tool. This tool allows the core to be oriented to its original position in the ground. Once a drill run was complete and the core barrel was out of the hole, the drill helper placed the barrel in a horizontal stand, attached the ACT II handheld controller, and rotated the barrel until the controller indicated the down position. At this point the rig geologist, using the bubble level supplied with the ACT II tool, marked the bottom of the core on the downhole side with a red chinagraph marker. The shoe of the core barrel, containing the piece of core with the orientation mark, was removed from the core barrel and set aside. A split tube containing the shoe was pieced back together with the core in the tube and an orientation line was extended up the core as far as possible from the initial orientation mark. Orientation was not able to extend beyond areas of spun core, gouge, or zones of broken rock if the rock could not be pieced back together and the line extend up core beyond this zone with confidence in orientation accuracy. Recovery, RQD, and number of fractures in the core were then recorded by the rig geologist and important features noted in a quick log.
Rig geologists recorded orientation lock interval quality (IQ) by measuring the orientation line lock with the previous or following drill run and assigned a value of 1 to 5. A 5 was recorded if the orientation line locked with the previous and/or following drill run’s orientation line and had a lock angle within 10°. A value of 4 had the same requirements except that the lock angle between the two orientation lines was greater than 10° but no more than 20°. A 3 was assigned if no lock was available with the previous or next run but an orientation line was able to be drawn up the core from the orientation mark from the shoe. The value 2 was unused and a value of 1 was assigned if the lock angle between orientation lines was greater than 20°. At this point, core was placed in wooden core boxes by the rig geologists, a run block was placed and hole number, box number, and depths were recorded on the top and front of the box and the box lid secured with wood screws. In 2019, a consultant review of oriented core data found generally acceptable orientation lock interval qualities given the schist fabric and faulted nature of the drill core.
Structural data was processed with a structural calculator program running in MS Excel. Any orientation measurements recorded in core that did not have an orientation lock quality of 3 or greater were not used. In 2013, oriented core reference lines were preserved where possible in the remaining half core after sampling.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 7-20 |
|---|

In 2020 and 2021, geotechnical drill holes were completed around the perimeter of pit designs. Geotechnical parameters were collected on-rig by a consultant. After completion of the drilling an optical televiewer survey was conducted for in situ structural information. Vibrating wire piezometers and thermistors were installed in select drill holes for additional groundwater and ground temperature information.
Two water wells were completed in 2015 and 2016. Wells were drilled as 8 in. diameter, 800 ft (244 m) water wells with 6 in. standpipes. Well #2 located approximately two miles north of MCN was flow-tested at over 450 gpm for 20 hours without discernable draw-down with calculated recharge rate at 100 gpm. Groundwater monitoring wells were completed in 2019 to measure and monitor groundwater levels, water quality, and temperatures. Seven additional 8 in. diameter groundwater monitoring wells were completed in 2021.
Select holes were drilled at MCS and MCN as PQ diameter and HQ diameter for metallurgical testing in 2020. Additional metallurgical samples were selected from archived drill core during 2021.
| 7.4. | QUALIFIED<br><br> PERSON’S OPINION ON DRILLING PROGRAMS |
|---|
In the QP’s opinion, there are no drilling, sampling, or recovery factors that could materially impact the accuracy and reliability of the results. The quantity and quality of the lithological, geotechnical, collar, and downhole survey data collected in exploration and infill drill programs are considered to be sufficient by the QP to support the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation as follows:
| • | Core logging was conducted to a<br> sufficient degree of detail and archived samples are safely stored for reference |
|---|---|
| • | Collar surveys have been performed<br> with adequate precision using industry standards |
| --- | --- |
| • | Downhole surveys have been performed<br> using industry standards |
| --- | --- |
| • | Core sample recovery is acceptable. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Geotechnical logging of drill core is<br> of sufficient quantity and quality for open pit design |
| --- | --- |
| • | The ground monitoring wells did not<br> indicate any issues that might impact the Project |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12,<br> 2023 | Page 7-21 |
| --- | --- |

| 8. | SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES,<br> AND SECURITY |
|---|---|
| 8.1. | SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH |
| --- | --- |
Diamond drill core samples were placed by contract drillers and drill helpers in wooden boxes after each run of core. Depth markers were added by the drill contractor after every run and boxes were labelled with drill hole number and depths contained in the box. Core boxes were then transported to the core shack for logging, photography, sampling, and storage.
After logging, sample interval blocks were placed by the logging geologist, leaving every tenth sample number open for blanks and standards. Sample intervals were generated at the geologists’ discretion and notes were added in the logging MS Excel template for each sample noting whether the sample interval was a geologic break or met the maximum sample length criteria for the program, typically not more than 3.1 m (10.0 ft). All Tetlin Project core was split in half lengthwise using core saws. Core is cut perpendicular to foliation by contract geotechnicians. Loggers drew cut lines on the core in areas where they want the core to be cut in a specific way. Split core was placed back in the core boxes until it is sampled. During sampling, one side of the split core from each sample was placed in a cloth sample bag with the sample number written on the bag and the sample tag inside the bag and the bag was tied closed. The half the core that was not sampled remains in the core box and is stored in wooden boxes under permanent cover in Tok. Full sample bags were stacked in super-sacks and stored at the core shack warehouse until they were sent out for assay.
| 8.2. | DENSITY |
|---|
Samples selected for specific gravity (SG) measurement have the dry sample weight and wet sample weight recorded. Prior to 2020, samples were selected for SG measurements every 20 m (65 ft) downhole. During 2020 and 2021 samples were selected every 15 m (50 ft) and at changes in oxidation or lithology.
Specific gravity procedures using Archimedes’ principle are as follows:
| • | 10 cm to 15 cm (4 in. to 6 in.) samples selected from whole core. |
|---|---|
| • | Oxides and highly broken sulfides are typically dried at 230°F for 24 hours. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The dried samples are vacuum sealed in <1 mm plastic. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Samples are weighed dry, and immersed in water. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The weights are recorded to determine density and are entered into drill<br> hole logging worksheets. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Intact specific gravity samples are returned to core boxes after density<br> analysis before sampling. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May<br> 12, 2023 | Page 8-1 |
| --- | --- |

| 8.3. | ANALYTICAL<br><br> LABORATORIES |
|---|
All surface samples submitted in 2009, 2010, and drill and surface samples from 2011 were prepared for assay by ALS Chemex, an independent laboratory with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 accreditation, at their facilities in Fairbanks, Alaska and analyzed at their Vancouver, British Columbia facility.
Samples submitted in 2012 were prepared by Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. (Acme), an independent laboratory with ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, at their facilities in Fairbanks and analyzed for gold at their Fairbanks, Alaska facility and for all other elements at their Vancouver, British Columbia facility. Sample reject material was submitted as check assays to be prepared by ALS Chemex at their facilities in Fairbanks, Alaska and analyzed at their Vancouver, British Columbia facility.
Drilling samples in 2013 were prepared by Acme and ALS Minerals, at their respective facilities in Fairbanks, Alaska and analyzed at their respective facilities in Vancouver, British Columbia. ALS Minerals analyzed 57% of the samples and Acme analyzed 43% of the 2013 drilling samples. All 2013 surface samples (soils, sediments, etc.) were prepared and analyzed by ALS Minerals.
All samples submitted in 2015 and 2016 were prepared for assay by ALS Minerals at their facilities in Fairbanks, Alaska and analyzed at their Vancouver, British Columbia facility.
In 2016, select drill core pulps from 2012, 2013, 2015, and 2016 were re-analyzed for Au, Ag, and Cu by cyanide leach with atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) finish. These samples were analyzed by ALS Minerals at their Vancouver, British Columbia facility.
Samples during 2017 were prepared and analyzed by both ALS Minerals and Bureau Veritas Minerals, an independent laboratory with ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation. Sample preparation was completed at their Fairbanks, Alaska facilities and analysis completed at their Vancouver, British Columbia facilities for multi-element analysis and Reno, Nevada facilities for primary Au analysis.
In 2018 and 2019, samples were prepared for assay by Bureau Veritas Minerals at their facilities in Fairbanks, Alaska and analyzed at their Vancouver, British Columbia facilities for multi-element analysis and Reno, Nevada facilities for primary Au analysis.
Samples during 2020 and 2021 were prepared by ALS Minerals at their Fairbanks, Alaska, Whitehorse, Yukon, and Vancouver, British Columbia facilities. Sample analysis was performed at the ALS Mineral facilities in Reno, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia.
All laboratories are independent of Contango, KGMA, or Peak Gold.
| 8.4. | SAMPLE PREPARATION |
|---|
Sample preparation procedures have varied over the duration of the Project.
Prior to 2020, sample preparation was completed as outlined below.
| Contango ORE,<br> Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 8-2 |
|---|

| • | Upon receipt by<br> the preparation laboratory, samples were inventoried. Sample submission information was verified to confirm<br> all samples were present. A received weight was measured, the sample was dried at 160°-180°F in fan forced<br> ovens, and a dry weight was collected. |
|---|---|
| • | A primary jaw<br> crusher was used to crush the core samples to 70% passing 2 mm. Some preparation facilities included two<br> stages of crushing with coarse crushing to 70% passing 19 mm and secondary fine crushing to 70% passing 2<br> mm. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The fine crushed<br> samples were riffle-split to obtain a 250 g sub-sample for pulverization. The split was pulverized to<br> >85% passing 75 μm (-200 mesh)<br> with a vibratory ring pulverizer. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The 250 g pulp was<br> split with 100 g to 120 g sent to the primary analytical laboratory and 10 g to 20 g for separate<br> multi-element analysis. Remaining pulp fraction was retained as the master pulp. An extra pulp was prepared<br> from every 10^th^ coarse and pulverized sub-sample for coarse and pulp replicate analysis. |
| --- | --- |
After 2020, the sub-sample size between crushing and pulverization has been increased to 800 g. An additional split has been collected every 10 samples for internal and external pulp duplicates.
| 8.5. | SAMPLE ANALYSIS |
|---|
In 2009 to 2019, analytical work consisted of 30 g fire assay with an AAS finish for gold and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrography (ICP-AES) using 4-acid digestion for multi-element analysis at the various laboratories used at the Tetlin Project. Since 2012, check assays have also been analyzed by fire assay with an AAS finish for gold and ICP-AES using 4-acid digestion for multi-element analysis.
All samples above 10 ppm Au were automatically re-assayed using a gravimetric finish. In 2018, ICP multi-acid analysis was conducted in Vancouver, British Columbia using a Spectro Ciros Vision and Spectro Arcos ICPs. Over-limits, above upper detection limits, are automatically re-analyzed for Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn with an AAS finish.
Since 2020, analytical methods have been modified. The size of gold fire assay with an AAS finish increased from 30 g to 50 g. Over-limit analyses for gold was decreased to 5 ppm and added for As, Co, and S.
| 8.6. | QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL |
|---|
A blank or standard has been inserted at a rate of approximately 10% since 2011. Certified reference materials (CRM or standards) are purchased from Rocklabs and Ore Research & Exploration Pty Ltd (OREAS) and reflect a range of Au, Ag, and Cu grades that span the grade range at Tetlin. Blank material is sourced from Browns Hill Quarry in North Pole, Alaska and each blank contains approximately one kilogram of material.
There are 4,706 gold bearing standards (8% of the database intervals) and 1,863 blanks (3% of the database intervals) to date. There are fewer measured results for Cu and Ag because some of the standards are not certified for these metals.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page 8-3 |
|---|

| 8.6.1. | STANDARDS |
|---|
Figure 8‑1 is a summary plot of all of the assay results for standards versus the certified standard value on the X axis. The graph indicates that there is no observed bias and that sample swaps are not apparent in the standard value range. The total standard failure rate for the Project is under 2%, and the standards performance indicates no significant areas of concern.
FIGURE 8‑1 STANDARDS PAIRS PLOT, 2011 THROUGH 2021

| 8.6.2. | BLANKS |
|---|
Blank material assayed above 0.025 ppm Au is treated as a failure. Total blank failure for the Project is below 2.5%. Based on the performance of blank material, there are no significant concerns.
| 8.6.3. | REPLICATES |
|---|
Pulp and crush duplicates of samples have been taken since 2015. To date, 1,427 pulp duplicates and 888 crush duplicates have been collected. In 2021, field duplicates were also collected by using the remaining half-split core after collecting the primary sample. Field duplicates were taken from 2021 drill core as well as select drill holes from previous campaigns. To date, 261 field duplicates have been collected.
Figure 8‑2, Figure 8‑3, and Figure 8‑4 plot gold assay results for pulp, crush, and field duplicates, respectively.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh<br> Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report<br> Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 8-4 |
|---|

FIGURE 8‑2 PULP REPLICATE GOLD ASSAY RESULTS

FIGURE
8‑3 COARSE REJECT REPLICATE ASSAY RESULTS

| Contango ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report<br> Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 8-5 |
|---|

FIGURE 8‑4 FIELD REPLICATE ASSAY RESULTS

| 8.7. | SAMPLE STORAGE AND SECURITY |
|---|
All samples processed in 2009 through 2021 were catalogued in the field and shipped via ground transport to the respective preparation facilities. A sample submittal document is prepared and chain of custody forms are submitted with the samples.
| 8.8. | QUALIFIED PERSON’S OPINION ON SAMPLE PREPARATION,<br> ANALYSIS AND SECURITY |
|---|
The QP is of the opinion that the samples taken and the sample preparation, analysis, and security procedures are adequate and suitable for Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.
| Contango ORE,<br> Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical<br> Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 8-6 |
|---|

| 9. | DATA VERIFICATION |
|---|
The drilling, data collection, and database management for the Project was completed and administered by Avalon Development Corp. as a contractor to Peak Gold through 2019. Beginning in 2020, KGMA became operator of the Project and took over drilling, data collection, and database management for the Project. Drilling at the Project that was used in this estimate spanned the period of 2011 through June 2021. KGMA geologists and database staff under the direction of the QP reviewed the data collection procedures as well as quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures and results to verify the Project drill hole database.
The database verification included the following steps:
| • | Imported<br><br> all assay data from the original certificate into the acQuire database for verification. <br> Imported all geologic data from the original digital logs to validate data. |
|---|---|
| • | A<br> statistical analysis of the QA/QC inserted standards; |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> statistical analysis of the QA/QC inserted blanks; |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> statistical analysis of the replicate pulps and replicate coarse rejects; |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> statistical comparison of the two assay laboratories using nearest neighbor methods; |
| --- | --- |
| • | Review<br><br> of the specific gravity data collection; |
| --- | --- |
| • | Review<br><br> of the drill hole collar survey information; and |
| --- | --- |
| • | During<br><br> site visits in 2019 and 2020, KGMA geologists observed and reviewed the sample procedures<br> and quality control data handling as described in this text. |
| --- | --- |
The QP carried out a review of these protocols and procedures during his site visit in 2021.
| 9.1. | QUALIFIED PERSON’S OPINION ON ADEQUACY OF THE DATA |
|---|
As a result of the data verification work that is summarized in this section, the QP finds that the Project data is reliable and suitable for the estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
| Contango<br> ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 9-1 |
|---|

| 10. | MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING |
|---|---|
| 10.1. | TEST WORK PROGRAMS AND<br> LABORATORIES |
| --- | --- |
Three historical metallurgical testing programs and one recent metallurgical test program were performed on Manh Choh mineralized samples by the following independent laboratories.
| 1. | SGS (Burnaby, British Columbia) performed gravity concentration and flotation<br> tests in 2014 (SGS, 2014). ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005 Accreditation. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA) (Reno, Nevada) performed gravity<br> concentration, flotation, and cyanide leaching tests in 2014 (KCA, 2014). No<br> accreditation at that time. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | McClelland Laboratories, Inc. (MLI) (Sparks, Nevada) performed flotation,<br> magnetic separation, gravity concentration, cyanide leaching, and comminution tests on<br> the Manh Choh mineralized samples from 2017 to 2019 (MLI, 2017, 2018, 2019). MLI<br> performed flotation, gravity concentration, cyanide leaching, and comminution tests on<br> Manh Choh samples in 2021 (MLI, 2021; Pocock, 2022). ISO/EIC Standard 17025:2017<br> Accreditation. |
| --- | --- |
| o | In 2018, MLI sub-contracted Bureau Veritas (BV) (Richmond, British Columbia) to<br> perform analyses on cleaner flotation concentrates and tailings. |
| --- | --- |
| o | In 2021, MLI sub-contracted Mineral Lab, Inc. (Mineral Lab) (Golden, Colorado) to<br> perform X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analyses on mineralized composites. |
| --- | --- |
| o | MLI sub-contracted Cyanco International, LLC (Sparks, Nevada) to perform testing<br> and analysis related to the use of cyanide. |
| --- | --- |
| o | MLI sub-contracted FLSmidth (Salt Lake City, Utah) to perform semi-autogenous<br> grinding (SAG) mill comminution (SMC) testing. |
| --- | --- |
In addition, Steinert carried out an ore sorting test program (Steinert, 2021).
| 10.2. | METALLURGICAL SAMPLING PROGRAMS |
|---|
For SGS’s 2014 test work, all samples collected were from MCS. Test composite information is listed in Table 10‑1.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 10-1 |
|---|

TABLE 10‑1 SGS TEST COMPOSITES SUMMARY
| Composites ID | Laboratory | Au<br><br> (oz/st) | Ag<br><br> (oz/st) | Cu<br><br> (%) | Stotal<br><br> (%) | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A - 564063 | SGS | 2.424 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 10.9 | 564063 – AVALON_DEV Drill Core, Split Rej FBK13000089RJ23 |
| B - 573066 | SGS | 0.004 | 6.56 | 5.85 | 29.2 | FA 1312588R027 TET 573066 Raw Sample FA 13125881 R 027 |
| C - 565119 | SGS | 0.656 | 1.13 | 1.31 | 10.5 | 565119 |
Samples
tested by KCA and MLI before 2020 were collected from 29 drill core samples from MCS and MCN.
The sample locations are illustrated in Figure 10‑1.
Samples
tested by MLI in 2021 were collected from 10 drill core samples from a drill program completed
in early 2021. One quarter of the drill core was used for geochemistry purposes with the
remaining three quarters of the core used for MLI’s metallurgical testing program. The sample
locations are illustrated in Figure 10‑2. Sample selection was carried out using predicted
exploration block model grades and logged data. Samples were selected by identifying the
desired redox and grade in each individual hole. The sample selection criteria are listed in
Table 10‑2.
FIGURE 10‑1 KCA AND MLI DRILL CORE SAMPLES PRIOR TO 2020

Source: KGMA, 2022a
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 10-2 |
|---|

FIGURE 10‑2 MLI 2021 DRILL CORE SAMPLES

Source: KGMA, 2022a
TABLE 10‑2 SAMPLE SELECTION CRITERIA
| Composites ID | Sample Name | Redox Class | Au Range<br><br> ppm | S Range<br><br> % | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPSxC | Manh Choh South Sulfide Master Composite | Unoxidized | 1-10 | 1-5 | - |
| MPOxC | Manh Choh South Oxide Master Composite | Oxidized | 1-10 | <1 | - |
| NPSxC | Manh Choh North Sulfide Master Composite | Unoxidized | 1-10 | 0.5-5 | - |
| NPSxC(1) | Manh Choh North Sulfide Master Composite (1) | Unoxidized | 1-10 | 0.5-5 | - |
| NPOxC | Manh Choh North Oxide Master Composite | Oxidized | 1-10 | <0.5 | - |
| MPSxV1 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 1 | Unoxidized | >5 | - | shallow |
| MPSxV2 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 2 | Unoxidized | >5 | - | deep |
| MPSxV3 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 3 | Unoxidized | <3 | - | shallow |
| MPSxV4 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 4 | Unoxidized | <3 | - | deep |
| MPSxV5 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 5 | Unoxidized | 3-5 | 1-3 | east |
| MPSxV6 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 6 | Unoxidized | 3-5 | 1-3 | west |
| MPSxV7 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 7 | Unoxidized | - | >3 | shallow |
| MPSxV8 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 8 | Unoxidized | - | >3 | deep |
| MPSxV9 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 9 | Unoxidized | - | <1 | shallow |
| MPSxV10 | Manh Choh South Sulfide Variability Composite 10 | Unoxidized | - | <1 | deep |
| MPOxV1 | Manh Choh South Oxide Variability Composite 1 | Oxidized | >5 | >1 | average |
| MPOxV2 | Manh Choh South Oxide Variability Composite 2 | Oxidized | <5 | <1 | average |
| NPSxV1 | Manh Choh North Sulfide Variability Composite 1 | Unoxidized | >5 | >1 | average |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-3 | ||||
| --- | --- |

| Composites ID | Sample Name | Redox Class | Au Range<br><br> ppm | S Range<br><br> % | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPSxV2 | Manh Choh North Sulfide Variability Composite 2 | Unoxidized | <5 | <1 | average |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NPOxV1 | Manh Choh North Oxide Variability Composite 1 | Oxidized | >3 | - | shallow |
| NPOxV2 | Manh Choh North Oxide Variability Composite 2 | Oxidized | <3 | - | shallow |
| NPOxV3 | Manh Choh North Oxide Variability Composite 3 | Oxidized | >3 | - | deep |
| NPOxV4 | Manh Choh North Oxide Variability Composite 4 | Oxidized | <3 | - | deep |
| 10.3. | METALLURGICAL CHARACTERIZATION | ||||
| --- | --- |
In 2014, SGS performed mineralogy analysis on metallurgical test head samples. In 2018, Bureau Veritas (BV), as sub-contractor to MLI, performed analyses on cleaner flotation concentrates and tailings. The analyses indicate that the predominant sulfide mineral in the MCS deposit is pyrrhotite while the predominant copper mineral is chalcopyrite. Pyrite, arsenopyrite, galena, and sphalerite were also present in the metallurgical samples. Gold was observed in the samples and is predominantly free gold and electrum.
During the 2021 metallurgical test campaign by MLI, XRD analysis was performed on ore composites by Mineral Lab, Inc. (sub-contracted by MLI). Results of the XRD analysis indicated that MCS contain substantial pyrrhotite (up to 20%). Arsenopyrite, orpiment, marcasite, and other sulfide minerals were observed in unoxidized composites.
| 10.3.1. | 2014 SGS<br> MINERALOGY REPORT |
|---|
In 2014, SGS performed XRD, QEMSCAN, optical microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) equipped with Energy Dispersive Spectrometers (EDS), and chemical analysis on three metallurgical tests samples, 564063 A, 573066 B, and 565119 C.
The analysis found all three samples contain moderate (10% to 30%) to major (>30%) pyrrhotite. Sample 573066 B contains moderate chalcopyrite and Sample 565119 C contains minor (2% to 10%) chalcopyrite. All samples contain minor to trace amounts of pyrite. Sample 565119 C also contains trace amounts of arsenopyrite and marcasite.
A summary of the liberation and association, exposure, and grain size of the gold for samples 563063 A and 565119 C is provided in Table 10‑3. No liberation and association, exposure, or grain size measurements were performed on Sample 573066 B due to low gold concentration in the sample.
Samples 563063 A and 565119 C have different mineral associations and gold grain sizes. Sample 563063 A consists of large size free gold, whereas gold in Sample 565119 C is mainly associated with sulfide minerals and contains fine grained gold. Taken together, the results suggest a gold recovery circuit design having gravity concentration followed by finer grinding for further liberation.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page<br><br><br><br><br> 10-4 |
|---|

TABLE 10‑3 2014 SGS GOLD MINERAL OCCURRENCE
| Gold Minerals | Distribution_% | 564063 A | 565119 C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberation and Association | Liberated | 56.7 | 23.1 | |||
| Gold Minerals: Sulfides | 17.2 | 60.1 | ||||
| Gold Minerals: Silicates | 2.1 | 0.2 | ||||
| Complex Grains | 24 | 16.6 | ||||
| Exposure | Exposed | 6.9 | 12 | |||
| –0–- 80% Exposed | 65.4 | 17.2 | ||||
| –0–- 30% Exposed | 26.3 | 57.7 | ||||
| locked | 1.4 | 13 | ||||
| Grain Size | >200 microns | 7 | 0 | |||
| 1–0–- 200 microns | 41.2 | 0 | ||||
| –0–- 100 microns | 20.9 | 3.1 | ||||
| –0–- 50 microns | 30.9 | 96.9 | ||||
| 10.3.2. | 2018 BV<br> MINERALOGY REPORT | |||||
| --- | --- |
In 2018, MLI sub-contracted mineralogical assessment to BV in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. BV analyzed two cleaner concentrate samples and two cleaner tailing samples. The main objective of the analysis was to provide evidence and guidance for improving the rougher and cleaner flotation test procedure for copper minerals. The mineral distribution for the rougher concentrates which generated the two cleaner concentrates and tailings is shown in Figure 10‑3.
The analysis indicates that the most abundant mineral in the 4393 F5 rougher concentrate is pyrite/marcasite, followed by chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, and arsenopyrite. There are also approximately 8% iron oxides identified in the rougher flotation concentrate. Minor minerals include bornite, chalcocite, and covellite.
The major mineral in the 4393 F6 rougher concentrate is pyrrhotite, with approximately 10% being chalcopyrite. There are also trace amounts of arsenopyrite, pyrite, and galena in the rougher concentrate.
Analysis of gold deportment shows approximately 40% of the gold in feed samples 4393 F5 and 4393 F6 is native gold and electrum.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 10-5 |
|---|

FIGURE 10‑3 2018 BV MINERAL DISTRIBUTION

| 10.3.3. | 2021 MINERAL LAB, INC REPORT |
|---|
In 2021, MLI sub-contracted XRD assessment to Mineral Lab. Mineral Lab analyzed five Manh Choh master composites, 18 Manh Choh variability composites, and one Fort Knox leach feed composite. The mineral distribution is shown in Figure 10‑4. The analysis indicates that the most common sulfide gangue minerals in the MCS sulfide samples are pyrrhotite, pyrite, and chalcopyrite.
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report Summary - May 12,<br> 2023 | Page 10-6 |
|---|

FIGURE 10‑4 MINERAL DISTRIBUTION BY MINERAL LAB, INC.

| 10.3.4. | PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS |
|---|
In the 2021 MLI metallurgical test work campaign, 23 Manh Choh ore composite samples were tested for specific gravity (SG). The SG of these samples ranges from 2.66 to 2.92 with a weighted average of 2.82. Ore moisture is assumed to be 2% to 3%.
In the 2021 MLI metallurgical test work campaign, leached tailing composites were sent to Pocock Industrial, Inc. (PII) for solid liquid separation (SLS) tests. The result (Table 10‑4) shows that with proper type and dosage of flocculant, and at a feed density of 16.5% solids, the Manh Choh leach tailing thickening underflow density can reach up to 64% solids. For design purposes, a 60% tailing underflow density was considered for the FS.
TABLE 10‑4 2021 PII SLS TEST RESULT
| Material<br><br> Tested | Recommended<br><br> High-Rate Thickener Operating Parameter Ranges | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested<br><br> Feed Solids<br><br> (%) | Flocculant | Design<br><br> Basis Net Feed Loading<br><br> (m^3^/m^2^hr) | Predicted<br><br> Overflow TSS Conc. Range<br><br> (mg/L) | Predicted<br><br> Underflow Density | |||
| Type | Dose<br><br> (g/MT) | Conc.<br><br> (g/L) | |||||
| AL-211 Leach Slurry | 16.5 | SNF AN905SH | 38-42 | 0.1 | 4.2 | 150-250 | 64% |
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh<br> Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report<br> Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 10-7 | ||||||
| --- | --- |

| 10.3.5. | COMMINUTION<br> CHARACTERISTICS |
|---|
In June 2018, seven metallurgical composites (three from MCN and four from MCS) were tested to measure abrasion index, Bond ball mill work index, and rod mill work index. Samples selected were well distributed in both pits. In 2021, four master composites and eight variability composites were tested by MLI. The results in Table 10‑5 demonstrate that all samples are between soft and medium hardness and abrasiveness.
Two sulfide master composite samples were sent to FLSmidth for semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill comminution (SMC) testing. The results are listed in Table 10‑6 and Table 10‑7. Based on the JKTech Database, Composite NPSxC(1) is considered to be medium to soft hardness, while Composite MPSxC is considered to be hard.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br> <br>Technical<br> Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 10-8 |
|---|

TABLE
10‑5 2021 MLI COMMINUTION TEST RESULTS
| Composites ID | Sample Location | Ore Type | Bond Ball Mill Work Index | Bond Rod Mill Work Index | Abrasion Index | Crusher Work Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kWh/st | Class | kWh/st | Class | g | Class | kWh/st | Class | |||
| PK18-MET-001 | Main Peak | 12.44 | Medium | 12.52 | Medium | 0.174 | Moderate | |||
| PK18-MET-002 | Main Peak | 12.62 | Medium | 11.46 | Medium | 0.096 | Light | |||
| PK18-MET-003 | Main Peak | 10.50 | Medium | 9.67 | Soft | 0.136 | Moderate | |||
| PK18-MET-004 | Main Peak | 9.60 | Soft | 11.65 | Medium | 0.097 | Light | |||
| PK18-MET-005 | North Peak | 11.29 | Medium | 8.96 | Soft | 0.124 | Moderate | |||
| PK18-MET-006 | North Peak | 11.11 | Medium | 7.05 | Soft | 0.101 | Moderate | |||
| PK18-MET-007 | North Peak | 12.14 | Medium | 9.96 | Medium | 0.008 | Light | |||
| MPOxC | Main Peak | Oxide | 10.76 | Medium | 9.33 | Soft | ||||
| MPOxV1 | Main Peak | Oxide | 9.88 | Soft | 8.83 | Soft | 0.021 | Light | 2.560 | Very Soft |
| MPSxC | Main Peak | Sulfide | 13.72 | Medium | 12.26 | Medium | ||||
| MPSxV1 | Main Peak | Sulfide | 12.48 | Medium | 10.97 | Medium | 0.180 | Moderate | 5.961 | Very Soft |
| MPSxV2 | Main Peak | Sulfide | 13.16 | Medium | 12.13 | Medium | 0.220 | Abrasive | 4.611 | Very Soft |
| MPSxV3 | Main Peak | Sulfide | 12.36 | Medium | 12.57 | Medium | 0.145 | Moderate | 4.901 | Very Soft |
| MPSxV4 | Main Peak | Sulfide | 13.30 | Medium | 11.45 | Medium | 0.142 | Moderate | 4.981 | Very Soft |
| MPSxV5 | Main Peak | Sulfide | 14.07 | Medium | 11.88 | Medium | 0.135 | Moderate | 4.841 | Very Soft |
| NPOxC | North Peak | Oxide | 11.98 | Medium | 8.27 | Soft | ||||
| NPOxV3 | North Peak | Oxide | 9.76 | Soft | 9.99 | Soft | 0.084 | Light | 5.351 | Very Soft |
| NPSxC(1) | North Peak | Sulfide | 13.10 | Medium | 12.43 | Medium | ||||
| NPSxV1 | North Peak | Sulfide | 12.53 | Medium | 10.12 | Medium | 0.152 | Moderate | 5.041 | Very Soft |
| Average | 12.26 | 10.85 | 0.135 | 4.781 | ||||||
| 75^th^ Percentile | 13.26 | 12.22 | 0.173 | 5.273 |
TABLE
10‑6 SMC TEST RESULTS
| Composite ID | Dwi | Mi Parameters | SG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mia | Mih | Mic | ||||
| kWh/m^3^ | % | kWh/mt | kWh/mt | kWh/mt | ||
| NPSxC(1) | 4.5 | 23 | 13.00 | 8.80 | 4.600 | 2.930 |
| MPSxC | 6.7 | 51 | 18.10 | 13.40 | 6.900 | 2.920 |
TABLE
10‑7 PARAMETERS DERIVED FROM THE SMC TEST RESULTS
| Composite ID | A | b | A x b | ta | SCSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kWh/mt) | |||||
| NPSxC(1) | 51.4 | 1.28 | 65.8 | 0.58 | 8.27 |
| MPSxC | 62.2 | 0.7 | 43.5 | 0.39 | 9.96 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br> <br>Technical<br> Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 10-9 | ||||
| --- | --- |

| 10.4. | METALLURGICAL TESTING |
|---|
Results of metallurgical testing programs demonstrates that Manh Choh ore is amenable to being recovered by gravity concentration, flotation, and cyanidation. Both MCS and MCN ores respond well to cyanide leaching, gravity concentration, and flotation.
In 2014, KCA performed gravity concentration, flotation, and leaching tests on 13 composites made from 18 assay reject samples from MCS. During the same period, SGS performed gravity concentration and flotation tests on three ore samples from MCS.
From 2017 to 2018, more comprehensive metallurgical test campaigns were undertaken by MLI. Samples from both MCN and MCS were subjected to gravity concentration, cyanide leaching, and comminution testing. A total of 45 ore composites were tested, of which 22 composites were made from MCN drill core samples and 23 composites were made from MCS drill core samples.
In 2019, additional drill core samples from Manh Choh were tested using rougher flotation, cleaner flotation, and magnetic separation.
In 2021, more drill core samples from Manh Choh were sent to MLI by Kinross. The samples were tested using agitated leaching, flotation, gravity concentration, etc.
| 10.4.1. | CYANIDE LEACHING TESTS |
|---|
TEST WORK BY KCA
In May 2014, KCA performed 26 cyanide bottle roll tests (BRT) on 13 ore composites made from MCS drill core samples. A total of 13 tests were conducted on head samples and 13 leaching tests were conducted on the gravity concentration tailings. All samples were ground to 80% passing (P80) 75 µm and leached at 40% solid. The NaCN concentration was maintained at 1 g/L. The leaching tests were run for 96 hours. Test results are shown in Figure 10‑5 to Figure 10‑7.
For the leaching tests on the fresh composites without any gravity concentration, the average gold recovery is 83% and the average silver recovery is 32%. The variance of these test results is high between 55% and 98% for gold and 0% and 86% for silver (Figure 10‑5).
Tests on the gravity concentration tailings show that the average gold recovery increases to more than 85% and the silver recovery, to greater than 50% (Figure 10‑5).
| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh<br> Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical Report<br> Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-10 |
|---|

FIGURE
10‑5 2014 KCA BRT GOLD AND SILVER EXTRACTION RATES

Figure 10‑5 compares leaching kinetics between the test series conducted on the fresh ore sample and gravity tailing samples. The results show that leaching gravity tailing samples takes less time than the leaching fresh mineralized samples.
FIGURE
10‑6 2014 KCA BRT GOLD LEACHING KINETICS

| Contango ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 10-11 |
|---|

Figure
10‑7 presents the sodium cyanide \(NaCN\) and lime
consumption rates. Fresh ore composites had an
average NaCN consumption of 11.6 lb/st of ore,
and lime \(Ca\(OH\)2\) consumption
averaged 11.1 lb/st. After gravity
concentration, the NaCN consumption decreased to
6.4 lb/st of ore, while lime consumption
remained at the same level as the consumption on
the fresh ore leach.
FIGURE 10‑7 2014 KCA BRT SODIUM CYANIDE AND LIME CONSUMPTION

Figure 10‑8 presents the reagent consumptions and gold and silver recoveries as a function of total sulfur concentration. Further analysis shows that the variance for gold and silver recoveries, and NaCN and lime consumptions directly correlate with the total sulfur grade in the samples.
| Contango<br> ORE, Inc. - Manh Choh Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary - May 12, 2023 | Page 10-12 |
|---|

FIGURE 10‑8 2014 KCA REAGENT CONSUMPTION RATES AND GOLD AND SILVER RECOVERIES AS A FUNCTION OF TOTAL SULFUR CONCENTRATION

TEST WORK BY MLI
From 2017 to 2021, 266 leaching tests were performed by MLI on 68 ore composites from the Project and one leach feed composite from the Fort Knox milling facility. A total of 31 composites were prepared from MCN drill core samples and the remaining 37 composites were prepared from MCS drill core samples. The Fort Knox leach feed composite is made of Fort Knox daily mill samples that were sampled in January 2021.
2017 MLI Test Work
In 2017, MLI conducted bottle roll leaching tests on 19 metallurgical composites made of drill core samples from MCN. Later in 2018, additional leaching tests were conducted on three low-grade composites made of drill core samples from MCN.
The above bottle roll tests were conducted following Test Procedure #1 (TP-1), whereby the samples were ground to P80 of 75 µm using laboratory steel ball mill. Leaching was done on 40% solid ore slurry. Lime was added to adjust pH of the pulp to between 10.5 and 11 before adding cyanide. Sodium cyanide was controlled and maintained at 2.0 g/L in the pulp. The leaching lasted for 48 hours. Rolling was paused for interim sampling.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary -<br> May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-13 |
|---|

The gold extraction rate at 48 hours averaged 96% and ranged between 90% and 100%. The average silver extraction rate is 68%. The results showed a slight direct correlation between gold extraction rate and gold head grade.
Figure
10‑9 shows the 25, 50,
and 75 percentile of
gold leaching
kinetics. The gold
extraction rate
increased with
increased cyanide
concentration \(2 g/L
NaCN\). Eleven of the
22 samples tested
achieved more than 90%
gold extraction within
12 hours of leaching.
FIGURE
10‑9 2017 MLI MCN
GOLD LEACHING KINETICS

The average NaCN consumption is 2.9 lb/st and the lime consumption averaged 13.5 lb/st. These consumptions directly correlated with total sulfur concentration in the ores. The results are shown in Figure 10‑10.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-14 |
|---|

FIGURE 10‑10 2017 MLI MCN LEACH TEST REAGENT CONSUMPTION

2018 MLI Test Work
Test Procedure TP-1
In 2018, a total of 28 BRT leaching tests were conducted on ore composites made of drill core samples from MCS. The test procedure that was followed in these tests is the same as that used for the BRT tests on the MCN ores (TP-1).
Samples were ground to P80 75 µm in a laboratory steel ball mill, followed by adjusting the slurry %solid to 40%. The slurry pH was adjusted between 10.5 and 11 by using hydrated lime. The NaCN concentration was monitored and controlled to be maintained at 2.0 g/L. Periodic solution samples were taken and assayed for leaching kinetics assessments. Pregnant solutions and residues were analyzed after 48 hours.
The MCS BRT testing results are as follows:
| • | Gold<br> extraction at<br> 48 hours<br> averaged 91%<br> and ranged<br> between 83%<br> and 97%, with<br> silver<br> extraction<br> averaging 41%. |
|---|---|
| • | The<br> gold<br> extraction is<br> relatively<br> slower than<br> that of the<br> MCN samples<br> under the same<br> test<br> conditions. At<br> a 12-hour<br> leach time,<br> only eight of<br> the 28 samples<br> tested reached<br> 85% gold<br> extraction. At<br> 24 hours, 20<br> of the 28<br> samples<br> reached 85%<br> gold<br> extraction. |
| --- | --- |
| • | NaCN<br> consumption is<br> much higher<br> than that for<br> MCN ore<br> samples under<br> the same test<br> conditions.<br> The NaCN<br> consumption<br> averages 15.4<br> lb/st and<br> ranges between<br> 2.2 lb/st and<br> 28.8 lb/st for<br> the 48 hours<br> leaching<br> period. Lime<br> consumption<br> averages 6.2<br> lb/st and<br> ranges between<br> 1.6 lb/st and<br> 19.4 lb/st. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-15 |
| --- | --- |

Figure
10‑11
illustrates
the direct
correlation
between NaCN
consumption
and total
sulfur
concentration,
while the lime
consumption
rate is
negatively
correlated
with the total
sulfur
concentration
in the
samples. A
similar
correlation is
noticed for
copper head
grades in the
head sample,
although not
as clear as
the
correlation
with total
sulfur grade.
FIGURE 10‑11 2018 MLI BRT MCS REAGENT CONSUMPTION AND GOLD AND
SILVER
RECOVERIES AS A
FUNCTION OF
TOTAL SULFUR
CONCENTRATION

The high NaCN consumption is caused by the highly reactive iron sulfide minerals, pyrrhotite and marcasite, in the MCS composite samples. MLI performed agitated leaching tests with addition of cement in the grinding stage and oxygen/air sparging in the leaching stage to mitigate the high reagent consumptions.
Test Procedure TP-2
Throughout
multiple test
conditions,
test procedure
#2 \(TP-2\)
delivered the
most favorable
results. In
TP-2, ore
samples were
ground to P80
75 µm with
lime and
Portland type
I/II cement \(8
lb/st\).
Leaching was
conducted at 1
g/L NaCN, pH
10.5 to pH 11,
and continuous
oxygen/air
sparging to
increase
dissolved
oxygen in the
pulp. Interim
solution
samples were
taken and
assayed for
leaching
kinetics
assessments.
Pregnant
solutions and
residues were
analyzed after
36 hours of
leach.
For the 28 MCS and three MCN composites that were tested under the TP-2 conditions, gold extraction after 36 hours averaged 89% and ranged from 77% and 97%, with silver extraction averaging 56%.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-16 |
|---|

Comparison of TP-1 and TP-2 Procedures
Figure 10‑12, Figure 10‑13, and Figure 10‑14 compare the test results between TP-1 and TP-2 on the same MCS composite samples. The average silver recovery is increased by applying TP-2 test procedure, without noticeably decreasing gold recovery. The gold leaching kinetics are slightly improved in the early stage of leaching from 0 to 12 hours. More importantly, the NaCN consumption rate decreases significantly from 15.4 lb/st to 4.5 lb/st. In addition, lime consumption decreased from 6.2 lb/st to 3.3 lb/st.
FIGURE 10‑12 2018 MLI GOLD AND SILVER EXTRACTION RATES USING TP-1 AND TP-2 ON MCS COMPOSITES

The gold leaching kinetics, shown in Figure 10‑13, are slightly faster than in TP-1 on the MCS composites. Eleven of the 28 samples achieved higher than 85% gold extraction after being leached for 12 hours.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-17 |
|---|

FIGURE 10‑13 2018 MLI GOLD LEACHING KINETICS USING TP-1 AND TP-2 ON MCS COMPOSITES

The average reagent consumptions in TP-2 were significantly lower than those in TP-1. The NaCN consumption averaged 4.5 lb/st and ranged between 0.1 lb/st and 12.0 lb/st of ore. The average lime consumption was 3.3 lb/st. The results are shown in Figure 10‑14.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-18 |
|---|

FIGURE 10‑14 2018 MLI REAGENT CONSUMPTIONS USING TP-1 AND TP-2 ON MCS COMPOSITES

In the later stage of the metallurgical test campaign, three ore composites made of drill core samples taken from MCN were also tested using the TP-2 procedure. Figure 10‑15, Figure 10‑16, and Figure 10‑17 compared the results of using TP-1 and TP-2 on the same MCN composite samples. For the three composites tested, TP-1 and TP-2 have very similar gold and silver recoveries and gold leaching kinetics. NaCN consumptions between the two test procedures are at the same level, while the average lime consumption decreased from 8.9 lb/st to lower than 4 lb/st. Lower lime consumption in the TP-2 testing is due to the buffering from the addition of Portland type I/II cement.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-19 |
|---|

Figure
10‑15 2018
MLI Gold and
Silver
Extraction
Rates Using
TP-1 and TP-2
on MCN
Composites

FIGURE 10‑16 2018 MLI GOLD LEACHING KINETICS USING TP-1 AND TP-2 ON MCN COMPOSITES

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-20 |
|---|

FIGURE 10‑17 2018 MLI REAGENT CONSUMPTIONS USING TP-1 AND TP-2 ON MCN COMPOSITES

Evaluation
of Other Test
Procedures
MLI also tested other conditions to optimize gold extraction and reduce reagent consumption. From 2017 to 2018, a total of 10 test procedures, including TP-1 to TP-10, were tested on ore composites made of drill core samples from the MCS deposit. The test parameters are detailed in Table 10‑8.
Table
10‑8 MLI
Leaching Test
Procedures
Matrix

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-21 |
|---|

TP-1 to TP-6 were compared on a set of composites, 4279-020, 021, 022, and 023 and the results are shown in Figure 10‑18. TP-1 delivers the highest average gold extraction rate, followed by TP-2 at 88% and TP-6 at 85%, with the remaining three test procedures providing gold recoveries lower than 85%. The average silver recovery of TP-2 is 54%, which is the highest. The average NaCN consumption rates of TP-2 to 6 are all significantly lower than TP-1. TP-2, 5, and 6 have the lowest NaCN consumption. TP-4 has the highest average lime consumption, while TP-2, 5, and 6 have the lowest. Gold leaching kinetics are shown in Figure 10‑19. TP-2, 5, and 6 have faster gold leaching kinetics than TP-1 in the early stage of the leaching. Overall, TP-2 is the best performer, having the second highest gold recovery, first highest silver recovery, and low NaCN and lime consumption rates. The series of tests confirmed that adding 8 lb/st of cement during grinding and oxygen sparging during the 36 hours leach delivers the best overall results.
TP-1, 2, and TP-7 to 10 were compared on a set of composites, 4279-011, 012, 014, and 016. The test results are shown in Figure 10‑20. Among all six test conditions, TP-8 is the only procedure where the average gold extraction is lower than 80%. Except for TP-8, all test procedures give an average recovery in a range between 83% and 86%. TP-2 provides the highest average silver extraction (51%). All test procedures provide significantly lower NaCN consumption compared to TP-1. TP-2, TP-7 to 9 consumed an average or less than 1 lb/st of lime. TP-9 and TP-10 confirmed that finer grinding does not provide a noticeable recovery improvement for gold and silver. Moreover, the finer grinding slightly increased reagent consumption. All test procedures provide faster gold leaching kinetics in the early stage of leaching than TP-1 (Figure 10‑21). Given the second highest average gold extraction rate, the first highest silver extraction rate, and low NaCN and lime consumptions, TP-2 is considered the best performer.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-22 |
|---|

Figure
10‑18 MCS
South Leach
Condition
Optimization
TP-1 to TP-6

FIGURE 10‑19 MCS GOLD LEACHING KINETICS ON TP-1 TO 6

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-23 |
|---|

FIGURE
10‑20 MCS
LEACH
CONDITION
OPTIMIZATION
TP-1, 2, 7 TO
10

FIGURE 10‑21 MCS GOLD LEACHING KINETICS ON TP-1, 2, 7 TO 10

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-24 |
|---|

2021 Test Work
In 2021, 158 leaching tests were performed by MLI on five master composites and 18 variability composites from Manh Choh and one leach feed composite from Fort Knox.
The grind size for agitated leaching was first determined by leaching the Manh Choh master composites ground to different mill product sizes (P80s).
The test
results
presented in
Figure 10‑22
show that
composites
were sensitive
to grind size,
with
recoveries
improving by
grinding finer
than P80
75 μm,
however, lime
and cyanide
consumptions
increase with
the decrease
of grind size
which makes
grinding finer
less
preferable. As
a result, the
grind size of
P80
75 μm and 60
μm are
considered in
the following
test work at
MLI.
FIGURE 10‑22 LEACH GRIND SIZE OPTIMIZATION

A total of 15 different leaching conditions were tested on the Manh Choh master composites to study the optimum processing method. The conditions are listed below in Table 10‑9 and the results of the optimization tests are presented in Figure 10‑23. Considering recovered precious metals prices, reagents and power costs, TP-3 is considered to be the optimum leaching condition for the Manh Choh mineralization.
In TP-3, 8 lb/st Portland type I/II cement and adequate amount of hydrated lime are added in grinding. The hydrated lime addition is based on experience that after grind pH is expected to be close to 10.5-11.0. The ore is ground to P80 75 μm, and then subjected to cyanide leaching at 2.0 lb NaCN per US ton solution. The leaching solution is periodically oxygen sparged to maintain a dissolved oxygen content of 5 ppm to 15 ppm. Slurry density is 40% solid. The leaching cycle is 24 hours. Under TP-3, gold leach rates were moderate to rapid.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-25 |
|---|

Table
10‑9 2021
MLI Leach Test
Conditions
| Test<br><br> <br>Procedure<br><br> <br>No. | Feed<br> Size | Added<br> During Grind<br><br> lb/st | Pre-aeration | NaCN<br><br> <br>Conc.<br><br> <br>lb/st<br><br> <br>soln. | Leaching<br><br> <br>pH | Lead<br><br> <br>Nitrate<br><br> <br>lb/st | Leach<br><br> <br>Time<br><br> <br>hr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrated<br><br> <br>Lime | Cement | |||||||
| 1 | Varied | No | 8 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 2 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | Yes | 0 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 3 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | Yes | 8 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 4 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | No | 4 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 5 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | No | 8 | No | 1.5 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 6 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | No | 8 | No | 1 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 7 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | No | 8 | No | 0.5 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 8 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | No | 8 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 1 | 24 |
| 9 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | No | 8 | No | 2 | 9.8-10.2 | 0 | 24 |
| 10 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | Yes | 0 | Yes | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 11 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | No | 8 | No | 0.5 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 72 |
| 12 | 80%-60<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | Yes | 8 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 1 | 24 |
| 13 | 80%-60<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | Yes | 10 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 14 | 80%-60<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | Yes | 8 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 0 | 24 |
| 15 | 80%-75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> μm | Yes | 8 | No | 2 | 10.5-11.0 | 1 | 24 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-26 | |||||||
| --- | --- |

Figure
10‑23
Leaching
Condition
Optimization

The blending tests are performed to investigate the feasibility of leaching Manh Choh ore and Fort Knox ore together in the same leaching train. The range of the ore blend ratio between Manh Choh ore and Fort Knox ore is between 20% and 30%. The results presented in Figure 10‑24 indicate that at the 20% blend ratio, the blended ore can be effectively leached at 0.5 lb/st NaCN strength, while the 30% blend ratio requires the NaCN concentration to be as high as 1.5 lb/st. As presented in Figure 10-27, results are evaluated on an actual vs. expected recovery basis.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-27 |
|---|

FIGURE
10‑24
BLENDING TEST
– ACTUAL VS.
EXPECTED GOLD
RECOVERY

GOLD CYANIDE WHOLE ORE LEACHING SUMMARY
The following conclusions are based on the test work conducted by KCA and MLI:
| • | Both<br> fresh drill<br> core samples<br> and gravity<br> concentration<br> tailings are<br> amenable to<br> cyanide<br> leaching at P80<br> 75 µm. |
|---|---|
| • | The<br> gold<br> extraction,<br> silver<br> extraction,<br> and lime<br> consumption<br> were<br> negatively<br> impacted with<br> the increase<br> in total<br> sulfur grade<br> and copper<br> grade in the<br> head samples;<br> the NaCN<br> consumption<br> increases with<br> an increase in<br> total sulfur<br> grade and<br> copper grade<br> in the head<br> samples. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-28 |
| --- | --- |

| • | The<br> high NaCN<br> consumption<br> and need for<br> additional<br> oxygen for the<br> MCS composites<br> is likely due<br> to highly<br> reactive iron<br> sulfides<br> (pyrrhotite)<br> and cyanide<br> soluble copper<br> (chalcopyrite)<br> present. |
|---|---|
| • | Grinding<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> to P80<br> 75 µm resulted<br> in sufficient<br> gold<br> extraction.<br> Finer grinding<br> to P80<br> 45 µm did not<br> provide<br> noticeable<br> recovery<br> improvements<br> for gold or<br> silver<br> extraction.<br> Finer grinding<br> also caused<br> slightly<br> higher lime<br> and NaCN<br> consumption. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Oxygen<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> sparging<br> during<br> leaching was<br> shown to be<br> required to<br> maintain<br> sufficient<br> dissolved<br> oxygen levels<br> in the pulp.<br> Air sparging<br> was not as<br> effective as<br> oxygen<br> sparging. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Adding<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> cement at 8<br> lb/st reduced<br> NaCN<br> consumption<br> significantly<br> with no<br> noticeable<br> decrease in<br> gold<br> extraction.<br> Silver<br> recovery was<br> improved by<br> adding cement. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Adding<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> lead nitrate<br> with a<br> decreased<br> cement dosage<br> decreased NaCN<br> consumption<br> with little<br> effects on<br> gold or silver<br> extraction.<br> Additional<br> lime was<br> needed in the<br> absence of<br> cement. |
| --- | --- |
The cyanide leaching test work conducted by KCA and MLI showed that high reactive sulfide materials in the Manh Choh ores are one of the challenges for economical gold and silver recovery, although adding cement in grinding and leaching with oxygen sparging helps reduce the high reagent consumptions.
10.4.2. FLOTATION
TESTS
In April 2014, SGS performed nine rougher flotation tests on three metallurgical composites after gravity concentration. The series of tests were conducted to evaluate flotation recovery of gold as a function of grind size. Target grind sizes were set to be P80 60 µm, 75 µm, 95 µm. The flotation tests were run at natural pH, without any pH adjustment. During the flotation tests, potassium amyl xanthate (PAX) was used as the sulfide mineral collector. Copper sulfate (CuSO4) was used as the activator and methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) was used as the frother.
The test results are summarized in Figure 10‑25 and Table 10‑10. The results show that with finer grinding, gold recoveries of the three composites are slightly higher. Different grind sizes had minimal impact on rougher flotation concentrate mass pull. Test B-573066 had the highest mass pull, averaging 74% of the feed mass. The high mass pull is caused by high sulfide minerals content in the sample, which is mainly pyrrhotite.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-29 |
|---|

Figure
10‑25 2014
SGS Flotation
Tests – Gold
Recovery and
Mass Pull

TABLE 10‑10 2014 SGS FLOTATION TESTS
| Composite<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ID | Calc Au<br> Head<br><br> (oz/st) | Grind<br> Size P80<br><br> (microns) | Au<br> Recovery<br><br> (%) | Mass<br> Pull<br><br> (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-564063 | 1.256 | 44 | 91 | 36 |
| A-564063 | 1.181 | 67 | 90 | 41 |
| A-564063 | 1.318 | 86 | 86 | 39 |
| B-573066 | 0.012 | 54 | 99 | 74 |
| B-573066 | 0.003 | 49 | 93 | 79 |
| B-573066 | 0.003 | 85 | 90 | 78 |
| C-565119 | 0.586 | 83 | 95 | 44 |
| C-565119 | 0.505 | 78 | 94 | 36 |
| C-565119 | 0.589 | 115 | 94 | 36 |
In May 2014, KCA performed a series of flotation tests on 13 metallurgical composite samples from the Project. Due to the limited sample size received, all flotation tests were only done at P80 75 µm. PAX was used as the sulfide minerals collector, CuSO4 was used as the activator, and Flo 742 was used as the frother. The slurry pH was measured but not adjusted throughout the tests.
The test results presented in Figure 10‑26 and Table 10‑11 show a direct correlation between the percentage of total sulfur content in the feeds and the gold flotation recoveries. This indicates most of the gold in the samples is associated with sulfide minerals.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-30 |
|---|

Figure
10‑26 2014
KCA Gold
Recovery and
Mass Pull as a
Function of
Total Sulfur
Content

TABLE 10‑11 2014 KCA FLOTATION TESTS
| Composite<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ID | Calc<br> Au Head<br><br> (oz/st) | Total<br> Sulfur<br><br> (%) | Au<br> Recovery<br><br> (%) | Mass<br> Pull<br><br> (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET-1 | 0.482 | 17.1 | 98 | 41 |
| MET-2 | 0.106 | 4.7 | 90 | 14 |
| MET-3 | 0.309 | 12.3 | 94 | 33 |
| MET-4 | 0.197 | 3.9 | 97 | 13 |
| MET-5 | 0.170 | 8.2 | 97 | 22 |
| MET-6 | 0.222 | 11.2 | 98 | 35 |
| MET-7 | 0.039 | 0.5 | 69 | 4 |
| MET-8 | 0.415 | 1.2 | 55 | 4 |
| MET-9 | 0.726 | 0.6 | 79 | 4 |
| MET-10 | 0.342 | 0.4 | 63 | 3 |
| MET-11 | 0.556 | 17.3 | 97 | 43 |
| MET-12 | 0.178 | 12.3 | 88 | 32 |
| MET-13 | 0.283 | 7.5 | 98 | 21 |
In 2019, MLI conducted 22 rougher flotation tests and nine cleaner flotation tests on the Manh Choh ore samples, of which only four rougher flotation tests and four cleaner flotation tests were assayed for gold content. Rougher flotation tests were conducted at P80 106 µm after grinding, and cleaner flotation tests were conducted on the rougher flotation concentrates. Rougher flotation slurry pH was measured but not adjusted. The cleaner flotation tests were adjusted to pH 12 with hydrated lime. The rougher flotation tests used PAX as the sulfide minerals collector and alkyl dithiophosphate (AERO 208) as the gold collector. CuSO4 was added as an activator and AERO 3418A was used as the frother.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-31 |
|---|

The results from MLI rougher flotation tests show a direct correlation for both gold recovery and mass pull with the total sulfur content in the samples (Figure 10‑27). Similar correlation was seen in the KCA flotation test work.
Figure
10‑27 2019
MLI Gold
Rougher
Recovery and
Mass Pull as a
Function of
Total Sulfur
Content

Cleaner
tests were
conducted to
produce
sellable
copper
concentrate.
However,
neither the
gold nor the
copper was
successfully
beneficiated
in the four
cleaner tests.
The gold
recovery in
the cleaner
tests averaged
41%, with
approximately
45% of the
gold lost in
the cleaner
tails. The
copper
recovery
averaged
76.2%, with
17.5% lost in
the cleaner
tails.
Cleaner
concentrates
and tailings
from Test F-5
\(on composite
4393-003\) and
Test F-6 \(on
composite
4393-004\) were
sent to BV for
mineralogy
analysis. The
results are
summarized in
Section 10.3.5
Comminution
Characteristics.
In the 2019 MLI metallurgical test campaign, three Manh Choh ore composites were tested. The result shows that Manh Choh ore is amenable to flotation. Without gravity concentration, gold recovery in the rougher flotation stage varies between 74.0% and 92.6%, with the mass pull varying between 5.9% and 11.6%.
Gold recoveries were lower for the oxide composites; cumulative gold recoveries were 74.0% for MCS oxides and 79.2% for MCN oxides comparing to 92.6% for MCS sulfides.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-32 |
|---|

The cleaner tests show that the gold grade in the flotation concentrate can be improved but at the expense of the overall gold recovery.
10.4.3. GRAVITY CONCENTRATION TESTS
From 2014 to 2018, 26 gravity concentration tests were performed by SGS, KCA, and MLI. The results are tabulated in Table 10‑12.
SGS studied gold recovery form gravity concentration as a function of grind size. The grind sizes tested were 60 µm, 75 µm, and 95 µm. Tests were performed on three different ore composites. The nine gravity concentration test results did not show clear correlation between gold recoveries and the grind sizes.
KCA conducted gravity concentration tests on 13 ore composites from Manh Choh. All tests were performed on 80% passing 75 µm ground ore composites.
MLI completed four gravity concentration tests on four metallurgical composites made of drill hole samples from the MCS. All samples were ground to 75 µm and hand panned to generate gravity rougher concentrate and then furthered cleaned by hand panning to produce gravity cleaner concentrates.
In the 2021 MLI metallurgical test campaign, 25 gravity concentration tests were performed. The test procedure is the same as the 2018 tests at MLI.
TABLE 10‑12 GRAVITY TESTS SUMMARY
| Composite<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ID | Laboratory | Test<br><br> <br>ID | Calc<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Au<br><br> <br>Head<br><br> <br>(oz/st) | Grind<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Size<br><br> <br>P80<br><br> <br>(µm) | Au<br><br> <br>Recovery<br><br> <br>(%) | Ag<br><br> <br>Recovery<br><br> <br>(%) | Mass<br><br> <br>Pull<br><br> <br>(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A<br> - 564063 | SGS | R-01 | 1.397 | 44 | 8% | 5% | 0.05% |
| A<br> - 564063 | SGS | R-04 | 2.117 | 67 | 42% | 44% | 0.23% |
| A<br> - 564063 | SGS | R-07 | 2.313 | 86 | 40% | 23% | 0.18% |
| B<br> - 573066 | SGS | R-02 | 0.102 | 54 | 90% | 1% | 0.28% |
| B<br> - 573066 | SGS | R-10 | 0.003 | 49 | 10% | 3% | 0.15% |
| B<br> - 573066 | SGS | R-11 | 0.003 | 85 | 6% | 1% | 0.33% |
| C<br> - 565119 | SGS | R-03 | 0.796 | 83 | 22% | 5% | 0.24% |
| C<br> - 565119 | SGS | R-06 | 0.580 | 78 | 8% | 4% | 0.26% |
| C<br> - 565119 | SGS | R-09 | 0.682 | 115 | 10% | 5% | 0.28% |
| MET-1 | KCA | 70973 | 0.520 | 75 | 63% | 33% | 7.50% |
| MET-2 | KCA | 70974 | 0.145 | 75 | 59% | 52% | 5.00% |
| MET-3 | KCA | 70975 | 0.326 | 75 | 48% | 27% | 9.40% |
| MET-4 | KCA | 70976 | 0.169 | 75 | 73% | 40% | 6.40% |
| MET-5 | KCA | 70989 | 0.167 | 75 | 52% | 7% | 1.00% |
| MET-6 | KCA | 70990 | 0.247 | 75 | 30% | 7% | 2.10% |
| MET-7 | KCA | 71236 | 0.333 | 75 | 17% | 17% | 0.50% |
| MET-8 | KCA | 70977 | 0.048 | 75 | 57% | 7% | 4.20% |
| MET-9 | KCA | 71237 | 0.514 | 75 | 14% | 9% | 0.60% |
| MET-10 | KCA | 71235 | 0.326 | 75 | 5% | 17% | 0.20% |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-33 | ||||||
| --- | --- |

| Composite<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ID | Laboratory | Test<br><br> <br>ID | Calc<br> Au<br><br> <br>Head<br><br> <br>(oz/st) | Grind<br> Size<br><br> <br>P80<br><br> <br>(µm) | Au<br><br> <br>Recovery<br><br> <br>(%) | Ag<br><br> <br>Recovery<br><br> <br>(%) | Mass<br><br> <br>Pull<br><br> <br>(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET-11 | KCA | 71238 | 0.520 | 75 | 45% | 19% | 3.00% |
| MET-12 | KCA | 71239 | 0.336 | 75 | 28% | 19% | 4.80% |
| MET-13 | KCA | 71240 | 0.131 | 75 | 44% | 13% | 3.40% |
| 4279-020 | MLI | G-1 | 0.564 | 75 | 52% | 18% | 1.74% |
| 4279-021 | MLI | G-2 | 0.407 | 75 | 30% | 10% | 2.40% |
| 4279-022 | MLI | G-3 | 0.330 | 75 | 15% | 11% | 1.77% |
| 4279-023 | MLI | G-4 | 0.140 | 75 | 24% | 26% | 1.32% |
| MPOxC | MLI | G-8 | 0.279 | 75 | 12% | 2% | 0.30% |
| MPSxC | MLI | G-9 | 0.108 | 75 | 16% | 7% | 0.48% |
| NPOxC | MLI | G-10 | 0.130 | 75 | 24% | 3% | 0.52% |
| MPSxV1 | MLI | G-12 | 0.036 | 75 | 4% | 3% | 0.44% |
| MPSxV2 | MLI | G-13 | 0.048 | 75 | 16% | 2% | 0.45% |
| MPSxV3 | MLI | G-14 | 0.049 | 75 | 23% | 3% | 0.39% |
| MPSxV4 | MLI | G-15 | 0.085 | 75 | 11% | 0% | 0.68% |
| MPSxV5 | MLI | G-16 | 0.135 | 75 | 20% | 5% | 0.49% |
| MPSxV6 | MLI | G-17 | 0.010 | 75 | 15% | 3% | 0.48% |
| MPSxV7 | MLI | G-18 | 0.128 | 75 | 21% | 8% | 0.55% |
| MPSxV8 | MLI | G-19 | 0.178 | 75 | 6% | 2% | 0.79% |
| MPSxV9 | MLI | G-20 | 0.012 | 75 | 3% | 8% | 0.53% |
| MPSxV10 | MLI | G-21 | 0.051 | 75 | 8% | 3% | 0.31% |
| MPOxV1 | MLI | G-22 | 0.092 | 75 | 2% | 0% | 0.52% |
| MPOxV2 | MLI | G-23 | 0.200 | 75 | 2% | 1% | 0.52% |
| NPSxV1 | MLI | G-24 | 0.327 | 75 | 33% | 17% | 0.38% |
| NPSxV2 | MLI | G-25 | 0.106 | 75 | 13% | 1% | 0.41% |
| NPOxV1 | MLI | G-26 | 0.142 | 75 | 5% | 1% | 0.40% |
| NPOxV2 | MLI | G-27 | 0.047 | 75 | 35% | 1% | 0.37% |
| NPOxV3 | MLI | G-28 | 0.319 | 75 | 38% | 11% | 0.48% |
| NPOxV4 | MLI | G-29 | 0.117 | 75 | 6% | 2% | 0.88% |
| NPSxC(1) | MLI | G-30 | 0.093 | 75 | 7% | 0% | 0.50% |
| MPSxV5 | MLI | G-31 | 0.127 | 75 | 13% | 3% | 0.55% |
| MPSxV7 | MLI | G-32 | 0.128 | 75 | 15% | 3% | 0.41% |
| MPSxV10 | MLI | G-33 | 0.053 | 75 | 16% | 5% | 0.68% |
| Average | 25% | 10% | 1.37% | ||||
| 25<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Percentile | 8% | 2% | 0.37% | ||||
| 75<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Percentile | 38% | 17% | 1.32% | ||||
| IQR | 30% | 15% | 0.95% | ||||
| Low<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Bound | 2% | 0% | 0.05% | ||||
| High<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Bound | 82% | 38% | 2.75% |
The gold recoveries from all 51 gravity concentration tests did not show clear correlation between gold head grades and gold recoveries. The average gold recovery from all tests was 25%, but the recovery variance standard deviation is as high as 20%. The average silver recovery from all tests was 10% (Figure 10‑28).
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-34 |
|---|

Figure
10‑28 Gold
and Silver
Recovery –
Gravity
Concentration

In MLI’s 2021 metallurgical testing campaign, MLI performed Extended Gravity Recovery Gold (EGRG) tests on four master composites from Manh Choh. The results show that the maximum gold recovery for Manh Choh ore samples varies between 16.3% and 50.7% (Figure 10‑29). MCN oxide and MCS sulfide samples have the highest possible gravity gold recovery, while MCN sulfide’s maximum gold gravity recovery is 16.3%.
FIGURE 10‑29 EGRG VS. GRIND SIZE

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-35 |
|---|

FIGURE
10‑30
CUMULATIVE
EGRG BY SIZE
FRACTION

10.4.4. MAGNETIC
SEPARATION
TESTS
In 2019, MLI conducted four magnetic separation tests on the cleaner concentrate and cleaner tailings from the F2 (4393-002) and F4 (4393-004) cleaner flotation tests. The tests used a permanent handheld magnet (420 gauss).
The results in Figure 10‑31 demonstrate that gold in the rougher concentrate tends to be beneficiated with non-magnetic particles. Based on the mineralogy analysis, the majority of magnetic mineral in the 4393-002 and 4393-004 rougher concentrates is pyrrhotite. This indicates that some gold is associated with pyrrhotite in these rougher concentrates.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-36 |
|---|

Figure
10‑31 Gold
Distribution
in Magnetic
Separation

10.4.5. FLOWSHEET
TESTS
GRAVITY/CYANIDATION
A total of four master composites and 18 variability composites were tested by hand panning followed by cyanide leaching (using TP-3) on the hand panned tailings. The samples represent MCS sulfide ore (11 samples), MCS oxide ore (three samples), MCN sulfide ore (three samples) and MCN oxide ore (five samples). The test results are provided in Table 10‑13, Table 10‑14, Figure 10‑32, and Figure 10‑33.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-37 |
|---|

TABLE 10‑13 OVERALL METALLURGICAL RESULTS, GRAVITY CONCENTRATION TAILINGS CYANIDATION TESTS
| Composite | MPOxC | MPSxC | NPOxC | NPSxC<br> (1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metallurgical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Results | G-8/AL-108 | G-9/AL-109 | G-10/AL-110 | G-30/AL-139 | ||||
| Au | Ag | Au | Ag | Au | Ag | Au | Ag | |
| Extraction<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> % of Total | ||||||||
| By<br> Gravity | 11.4 | 1.8 | 16.1 | 7.0 | 23.7 | 2.6 | 7.4 | 0.4 |
| By<br> Cyanidation | ||||||||
| in 1 hr | 37.9 | 40.7 | 21.2 | 14.4 | 48.8 | 56.6 | 51.6 | 51.1 |
| in 6<br> hrs | 81.4 | 58.9 | 63.3 | 44.3 | 62.7 | 68.9 | 79.5 | 64.2 |
| in 12<br> hrs | 83.4 | 60.5 | 72.5 | 50.4 | 68.7 | 73.5 | 84.1 | 66.3 |
| in 18<br> hrs | 84.0 | 62.0 | 74.5 | 52.1 | 70.5 | 73.4 | 85.8 | 69.2 |
| in 24<br> hrs | 83.5 | 60.2 | 76.8 | 55.8 | 68.8 | 73.6 | 84.5 | 72.4 |
| Combined<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Grav/CV<br> Extraction, %<br> of total | 94.9 | 62.0 | 92.9 | 62.8 | 92.5 | 76.2 | 91.9 | 72.8 |
| Extracted,<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> oz/st feed | 0.242 | 0.20 | 0.092 | 0.10 | 0.110 | 0.35 | 0.079 | 0.08 |
| Tail<br> Assay, oz/st^(^*^)^ | 0.013 | 0.12 | 0.007 | 0.06 | 0.009 | 0.11 | 0.007 | 0.03 |
| Calculated<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Head, oz/st<br> feed | 0.255 | 0.32 | 0.099 | 0.16 | 0.119 | 0.46 | 0.086 | 0.11 |
| Head<br> assay, oz/st<br> ore^(^*^)^ | 0.279 | 0.32 | 0.106 | 0.17 | 0.135 | 0.48 | 0.091 | 0.11 |
| Gravity<br> Conc. Wt.% of<br> feed | 0.30 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.50 | ||||
| NaCN<br> Consumed,<br> lb/ton feed | 2.73 | 4.32 | 2.96 | 1.97 | ||||
| Lime<br> Added, Lb/ton<br> feed | 22.2 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 2.0 | ||||
| Final<br> pH | 11.0 | 11.0 | 10.9 | 10.4 | ||||
| Natural<br> pH (40%<br> solids) | 11.1 | 11.2 | 11.0 | 10.7 |
^(^*^)^ Average of triplicate assays.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-38 |
|---|

TABLE 10‑14 SUMMARY METALLURGICAL RESULTS, GRAVITY CONCENTRATION TAILINGS CYANIDATION TESTS
| MLI<br> Test | Lime<br> Added During<br> Grind<br><br> lb/ton | Au<br> Recovery<br><br> % of<br> total | oz/ton<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Au feed | Cu<br> Ext’d^(^*^)^<br><br> 22m | Reagent<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Requirements<br><br> lb/ton<br> feed | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grav. | Ext’d | Head<br> Grade | NaCN | Lime | |||||||||
| Composite | No. | Grav. | CN | Total | Conc. | CN | Tail | Cl'd | Assayed | Cons. | Added | ||
| MPSxV1 | AL-121 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 78.3 | 81.9 | 0.001 | 0.026 | 0.006 | 0.033 | 0.034 | 84 | 2.05 | 4.0 |
| MPSxV2 | AL-122 | 4.0 | 16.0 | 72.6 | 88.6 | 0.007 | 0.032 | 0.005 | 0.044 | 0.047 | 432 | 3.51 | 6.4 |
| MPSxV3 | AL-123 | 3.9 | 23.1 | 68.1 | 91.2 | 0.010 | 0.031 | 0.004 | 0.045 | 0.039 | 106 | 2.16 | 3.9 |
| MPSxV4 | AL-124 | 4.0 | 10.5 | 76.7 | 87.2 | 0.008 | 0.060 | 0.010 | 0.078 | 0.097 | 173 | 2.87 | 4.0 |
| MPSxV5 | AL-125 | 4.0 | 19.8 | 74.5 | 94.3 | 0.024 | 0.092 | 0.007 | 0.123 | 0.150 | 541 | 6.97 | 13.0 |
| MPSxV5 | AL-144 | 13.0 | 12.2 | 81.7 | 93.9 | 0.014 | 0.094 | 0.007 | 0.115 | 0.150 | 511 | 5.67 | 15.1 |
| MPSxV6 | AL-126 | 4.0 | 14.2 | 75.1 | 89.3 | 0.001 | 0007 | 0.001 | 0.009 | 0.011 | 105 | 1.62 | 4.4 |
| MPSxV7 | AL-127 | 4.0 | 20.9 | 68.0 | 88.9 | 0.024 | 0.080 | 0.013 | 0.117 | 0.119 | 497 | 7.46 | 13.8 |
| MPSxV7 | AL-145 | 13.8 | 14.7 | 75.1 | 89.8 | 0.017 | 0.088 | 0.012 | 0.117 | 0.119 | 548 | 6.81 | 17.4 |
| MPSxV8 | AL-128 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 85.6 | 91.4 | 0.009 | 0.139 | 0.014 | 0.162 | 0176 | 93 | 3.32 | 4.0 |
| MPSxV9 | AL-129 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 87.9 | 91.2 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.011 | 0.009 | 37 | 0.54 | 4.0 |
| MPSxV1O | AL-130 | 4.0 | 7.8 | 50.3 | 58.1 | 0.004 | 0.024 | 0.020 | 0.048 | 0.049 | 2,274 | 12.47 | 19.0 |
| MPSxV1O | AL-149 | 19.0 | 16.4 | 46.0 | 62.4 | 0.008 | 0.022 | 0.018 | 0.048 | 0.049 | 1,967 | 11.90 | 25.3 |
| MPOxV1 | AL-131 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 91.6 | 94.0 | 0.002 | 0.077 | 0.005 | 0.084 | 0.087 | 164 | 2.73 | 12.9 |
| MPOxV2 | AL-132 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 94.3 | 96.7 | 0.004 | 0.173 | 0.006 | 0.183 | 0.214 | 60 | 1.18 | 16.4 |
| NPSxV1 | AL-133 | 5.0 | 32.6 | 60.0 | 92.6 | 0.097 | 0.179 | 0.022 | 0.298 | 0.293 | 82 | 1.32 | 5.0 |
| NPSxV2 | AL-134 | 5.0 | 13.0 | 73.7 | 86.7 | 0.013 | 0.072 | 0.013 | 0.098 | 0.105 | 282 | 2.03 | 5.0 |
| NPOxV1 | AL-135 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 86.2 | 90.8 | 0.006 | 0112 | 0.012 | 0.130 | 0.150 | 40 | 1.08 | 11.2 |
| NPOxV2 | AL-136 | 5.0 | 34.5 | >63.2 | >97.7 | 0.015 | 0.028 | <0.001 | <0.044 | 0.057 | 65 | 0.82 | 8.7 |
| NPOxV3 | AL-137 | 5.0 | 37.4 | 55.8 | 93.2 | 0.109 | 0.163 | 0.020 | 0.292 | 0.381 | 61 | 1.01 | 6.2 |
| NPOxV4 | AL-138 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 86.0 | 92.5 | 0.007 | 0.092 | 0.008 | 0.107 | 0.097 | 74 | 1.26 | 5.1 |
(*) CN feed basis, i.e., lb Cu extracted per 106 lb of feed.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-39 |
|---|

Figure
10‑32 Gold
and Silver
Recoveries –
Gravity and
Cyanide
Leaching Tests

FIGURE 10‑33 REAGENT CONSUMPTION – GRAVITY AND CYANIDE LEACHING TESTS

Gravity/cyanide
leaching tests
were also
conducted on
each of the 18
variability
composites
after blending
with Fort Knox
feed material
at a 20%
ratio. The
Manh Choh
variability
samples were
ground with
lime and 8
lb/st cement.
After
grinding, the
samples were
hand panned to
recover
gravity gold.
The tailings
of the gravity
concentration
were blended
with the Fort
Knox leach
feed composite
at 0.5 lb/st
NaCN
maintained.
The slurry was
sparged
continuously
with air.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-40 |
|---|

The gold recoveries are evaluated by comparing to the unblended variability test results. As shown in Figure 10‑34, all gravity/cyanide leaching tests on 20% blend samples were below their expected gold recoveries.
Figure
10‑34 Gold
Recovery –
Blending Tests

GRAVITY/ROUGHER
\(+CLEANER\)
FLOTATION/CYANIDATION
Three Manh Choh master composites were subjected to bulk gravity concentration followed by flotation concentration and cyanide leaching treatment (Figure 10‑35 and Figure 10‑36).
The ore samples were ground to P80 212 μm. The ground samples were slurried with water and processed through a laboratory scale Knelson gravity concentrator to produce rougher gravity concentrates and tailings. The rougher concentrates were further beneficiated by hand panning to generate cleaner concentrates. Both cleaner concentrates and tailings were assayed. The remaining cleaner tailings were combined with rougher tailings for the next stage’s treatment.
The combined gravity tailings were ground to P80
75 μm
and then
subjected to
flotation
tests. The
ground slurry
was diluted to
33% solid
using water,
then
conditioned
with copper
sulfate.
Hydrated lime
or soda ash
was used to
adjust the
slurry pH to
7.5. PAX and
AERO 208 were
used as the
collectors.
For
gravity/rougher
flotation/cyanidation
tests, the
rougher
concentrates
were subjected
to intensive
leaching,
while the
rougher tails
were subject
to agitated
leaching. For
gravity/rougher
and
cleaner/cyanidation
tests, the
rougher
concentrates
were further
beneficiated
by cleaner
flotation
without
introducing
any additional
reagents. The
cleaner
tailings were
re-combined
with rougher
tailings as
flotation
tailings for
agitated
leaching
tests.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-41 |
|---|

The flotation tailings were leached following standard Fort Knox plant leaching conditions. The slurry density was adjusted to 50% solids, continuous air sparging, and the solution cyanide concentration was maintained at 0.50 lb/st NaCN. The samples were leached for 24 hours.
Figure
10‑35
Flowsheet –
Gravity/Rougher/Cyanidation

FIGURE 10‑36 FLOWSHEET – GRAVITY/ROUGHER AND CLEANER/CYANIDATION

SUMMARY RESULTS OF FLOWSHEET OPTIONS STUDY
The results of the flowsheet options study are summarized in Table 10‑15. The Manh Choh samples respond to the gravity/flotation/cyanidation
flowsheet
well, however,
the overall
reagent
consumption
was higher
than the whole
ore leaching
options.
Especially for
the MCS
sulfide
composite, the
savings in
NaCN and lime
consumption
made the whole
ore leach the
preferred
option for the
FS.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-42 |
|---|

Table
10‑15
Results of
Flowsheet
Option Study
| Composite | Process | Au<br><br> <br>Recovery | Ag<br><br> <br>Recovery | NaCN<br><br> <br>Consumption | Lime<br><br> <br>Consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | lb/st | lb/st | ||
| MPOxC | CN | 95.5 | 74.5 | 2.0 | 22.3 |
| Grav/CN | 94.9 | 62.0 | 2.7 | 22.2 | |
| Grav/Ro.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Flot/CN | 94.8 | 63.5 | 2.4 | 16.5 | |
| Grav/Ro+Cl.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Flot/CN | 89.3 | 76.7 | 1.7 | 18.4 | |
| MPSxC | CN | 93.0 | 65.5 | 3.5 | 3.9 |
| Grav/CN | 92.9 | 62.8 | 4.3 | 3.5 | |
| Grav/Ro.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Flot/CN | 91.1 | 55.8 | 11.0 | 7.0 | |
| Grav/Ro+Cl.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Flot/CN | 83.4 | 31.0 | 6.6 | 11.7 | |
| NPOxC | CN | 91.0 | 71.7 | 2.1 | 6.2 |
| Grav/CN | 92.5 | 76.2 | 3.0 | 4.2 | |
| Grav/Ro.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Flot/CN | 89.2 | 72.4 | 2.8 | 5.8 | |
| Grav/Ro+Cl.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Flot/CN | 72.9 | 58.5 | 1.8 | 9.2 |
10.5. PROCESS SELECTION
10.5.1. PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA
The key process design criteria for the facility are provided in Table 10‑16.
TABLE 10‑16 DESIGN CRITERIA
| Description | Units | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Manh<br> Choh Ore | ||
| Campaign<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Duration | days | 30.42 |
| Mass<br> Flow Rate | stpd | 12,000 |
| Feed<br> Grade - Au | Troy<br> oz/st | 0.32 |
| Feed<br> Grade - Ag | Troy<br> oz/st | 0.44 |
| Overall<br> Recovery - Au | % | 90.50 |
| Overall<br> Recovery - Ag | % | 69.34 |
| Feed<br> Rate | stph | 543.5 |
| Availability | % | 92 |
| Ore<br> Characteristics | ||
| Crushing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Work Index | kWh/st | 9.0 |
| Bond<br> Ball Mill Work<br> Index | kWh/st | 11.4 |
| Bond<br> Rod Mill Work<br> Index | kWh/st | 12.2 |
| Abrasion<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Index | g | 0.11 |
| Ore<br> Bulk Density | lbs/ft^3^ | 100-112 |
| Solids<br> SG | 2.82 | |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-43 | |
| --- | --- |

| Description | Units | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture | % | 2-3 |
| Product<br> Size – P80 | microns | 75 |
| Design<br> Life | years | 5 |
| Maximum<br> Cement<br> Addition | lbs/st<br> ore | 8.0 |
| Maximum<br> Lime Addition<br> Leach Circuit | lbs/st<br> ore | 17.4 |
| Grinding<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Area | ||
| Operating<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Hydrocyclones | No. | 10 |
| Hydrocyclone<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Diameter | inches | 20 |
| Cement<br> Silo Capacity | st | 100 |
| Leach<br> & CIP Area | ||
| Number<br> of Leach Tanks | No. | 2 |
| Number<br> of CIP Tanks | No. | 6 |
| Gold<br> Recovery in<br> CIP Circuit | % | 90 |
| Silver<br> Recovered in<br> CIP Circuit | % | 61.5 |
| CIP<br> Carbon Advance<br> Rate | st/d | 38 |
| Cyanide<br> Addition to<br> Leach Circuit | lbs/st<br> ore | 4.1 |
| Leach<br> Slurry Density | %<br> solids | 55 |
| Elution<br> Area | ||
| Elution<br> Columns | No. | 2 |
| Elution<br> Column<br> Capacity | st | 12 |
| Loaded<br> Carbon | oz/st<br> carbon | 150 |
| Stripped<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Carbon | oz/st<br> carbon | 10 |
| Elution<br> Time | hours | 11.1 |
| Strips<br> per day per<br> Column | No. | 2 |
| Stripping<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Temperature | °F | 270 |
| Additional<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Boilers<br> Required | No. | 1 |
| Additional<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Heat<br> Exchangers<br> Required | No. | 2 |
| Cyanide<br> Destruction | ||
| Number<br> of Detox Tanks | No. | 2 |
| Retention<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Time | hours | 2.0 |
| Feed<br> Rate - Design | stph | 939 |
| Product<br> Size - P80 | microns | 75 |
| Feed<br> Density | % | 59 |
| Operating<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> pH | 8.0 –<br> 9.0 | |
| Cyanide<br> Concentration<br> Feed End | ppm | 500 |
| Cyanide<br> Concentration<br> After Detox | ppm | 7.0 |
| SMBS<br> Consumption<br> Rate | lbs/st | 6.00 |
| Copper<br> Sulfate<br> Consumption<br> Rate | lbs/st | 1.02 |
| Lime<br> Consumption<br> Rate | lbs/st | 2.03 |
The existing Fort Knox processing facility will continue to operate with Fort Knox ore on a batch basis along with the Manh Choh ore. The equipment and process as is currently designed will not be modified when processing ore from Fort Knox, however, additional equipment and piping modifications to some areas of the plant will be required for when processing Manh Choh ore. To offset the reduction in throughput when processing Manh Choh ore, modifications will be done in parallel alongside the existing equipment. Where applicable, synergies that can be found throughout the entire circuit when processing either ore will be used to reduce capital expenditures (capex) and installation times. The modifications to the plant will be flexible and will allow for a seamless switch from one ore to the other.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-44 |
|---|

The site conditions, operating conditions, and safety parameters are documented and provided for in the design basis. The environmental constraints have been identified and are considered in the design. There is a low probability for the production of leachate that is acidic or contains levels of metals that might contaminate surface or groundwater from the coarse ore stockpile. To mitigate any potential contamination of ground water, any seepage is collected via the stockpile runoff pond and pumped to the process water tank in the mill.
10.5.2. POTENTIAL
PROCESS
IMPROVEMENTS
Flotation
was
investigated
as an
alternative
process in the
test work. No
new
alternative
processes were
identified for
the Mill
Modification
project.
Several
process
improvements
have been
identified and
are listed in
Table 10‑17.
TABLE 10‑17 POTENTIAL PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS
| Description | Conclusion | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Installation<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> of Auto<br> Dilution for<br> the thickener<br> feed well. | Will<br> decrease the<br> feed solids<br> level prior to<br> flocculation,<br> improving<br> particle<br> setting rates. |
| 2 | Acid<br> wash carbon<br> prior to<br> elution. | Improve<br> elution<br> efficiency by<br> removing<br> impurities<br> such as<br> copper,<br> calcium, and<br> magnesium which<br> can impede<br> both the<br> elution step<br> and the later<br> adsorption of<br> gold onto the<br> carbon after<br> it has been<br> returned to<br> the CIP<br> circuit. |
| 3 | Regeneration<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> of all carbon<br> prior to<br> sending back<br> to CIP<br> circuit. | Restore<br> the activity<br> of spent<br> activated<br> carbon by<br> removal of<br> organic<br> absorbates.<br> This will<br> lower the need<br> to add<br> additional<br> fresh carbon<br> into the<br> circuit. |
| 4 | Replace<br> piping to<br> electrowinning<br> circuit. | Increase<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> solution flow<br> rates. |
| 5 | Hydraulic<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> study of the<br> slurry flow. | Eliminate<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> smaller inter<br> tank piping<br> and use<br> existing<br> piping to save<br> on costs. |
| 6 | Regular<br> cleaning of<br> heat exchanger<br> and lines with<br> sulfamic acid. | Will<br> reduce the<br> buildup of<br> scale within<br> the heat<br> exchanger and<br> associated<br> piping. Also<br> improve heat<br> exchange<br> within the<br> heat<br> exchangers. |
| 7 | In-line<br> heating of<br> eluate. | Potential<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> to eliminate<br> extra heater<br> for heating of<br> elution<br> columns.<br> Reduction of<br> elution time. |
| 8 | Heating<br> of portion of<br> eluate prior<br> to stripping. | Potential<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> to eliminate<br> extra heater<br> for heating of<br> elution<br> columns.<br> Reduction of<br> elution time. |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-45 | |
| --- | --- |

10.5.3. PROCESS MODIFICATIONS
Higher
grade ore from
the proposed
Manh Choh mine
site will be
processed at
the existing
Fort Knox
milling
complex.
Manh Choh ore will be batched or campaigned through the Fort Knox concentrator at a rate of 12,000 stpd for a period of 20 to 30 days. The ore will be processed using the existing process flowsheet with some modifications to accommodate for the decrease in throughput. Where possible, the processing of the Manh Choh ore will share equipment with the processing of the Fort Knox ore, to reduce capital costs, reduce construction time, and standardize operating and maintenance practices. Equipment and facilities with capacity to cater for the processing of Manh Choh ore will not be duplicated (e.g., gold smelting facilities, crushing/grinding, leaching, and CIP circuits).
The process plant includes a primary crusher, a SAG mill, and two ball mills of which only one is currently operating in closed-circuit, each with a cluster of hydrocyclones to control grind size.
When processing Manh Choh ore, only ball mill No. 2 will be operated, along with a single gravity concentrator to recover gravity recoverable coarse gold, and two (of seven) cyanide leach tanks to compensate for the reduction in tonnage. The recovery of gold in solution via activated carbon (CIP circuit) will use all six existing tanks to maximize absorption efficiency due to the high-grade Manh Choh plant feed.
Modifications
to the carbon
elution
circuit will
include two
new loaded
carbon
dewatering
screens, one
new boiler,
and two
additional
heat
exchangers. A
new cyanide
detoxification
circuit is
required to
lower cyanide
content in the
CIP tails
before they
are sent to
the TSF.
Modifications
to the
existing
feedwell for
the tailings
thickener is
also
scheduled. The
current
reagent pumps
will be
replaced along
with the
addition of a
new cement
silo, lime
silo package
\(includes
pumps and
tanks\) and a
new cyanide
mixing system
using ISO
containers to
generate a
24%wt cyanide
solution used
in the
leaching
circuit.
Piping
modifications
throughout the
circuit will
also be needed
to account for
the reduction
in tonnage
across the
plant.
Fort Knox Mill Modifications are as follows.
Ore Handling System/Grinding Area/Leach/CIP Area
| • | A<br> new 100 st<br> cement silo<br> located next<br> to the<br> existing 200<br> st lime silo<br> discharging<br> onto the SAG<br> mill feed<br> conveyor. |
|---|---|
| • | New<br> cyclones for<br> cyclone<br> cluster No. 2.<br> A total of ten<br> in. to 20 in.<br> diameter<br> cyclones. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Installation<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> of an existing<br> slurry line<br> which will<br> have the<br> ability to<br> divert 20% wt<br> of the cyclone<br> underflow to<br> the SAG mill<br> feed chute. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Installation<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> of a new line<br> (12 in.) from<br> the pre-leach<br> thickener<br> distributor<br> box<br> (23-CU-016) to<br> the thickener<br> feed box. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new pre-leach<br> thickener<br> underflow pump<br> (23-PP-701)<br> and a line to<br> the grit feed<br> box<br> distributor<br> (23-CU-018). |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-46 |
| --- | --- |

| • | A<br> new line (14<br> in.) from the<br> distributor<br> grit feed box<br> (23-CU-018) to<br> the grit<br> screens<br> distributor<br> (23-CU-020). |
|---|---|
| • | A<br> new line (14<br> in.) from the<br> drop box in<br> leach tank No.<br> 1 to the feed<br> on leach tank<br> No. 6 and new<br> inter tank<br> line to leach<br> tank No. 7. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new line (14<br> in.) from the<br> discharge of<br> leach tank No.<br> 7 to the feed<br> end of CIP<br> tank No. 1 and<br> No. 2 (tank<br> 23-TK-<br> 009/010) |
| --- | --- |
| • | New<br> inter-tank<br> lines (14 in.)<br> for all<br> connections<br> pipes to the<br> CIP tanks. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new line (12<br> in.) from the<br> discharge of<br> CIP No. 6 to<br> the tailings<br> thickener feed<br> box<br> (F29-TAN-201). |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new sump pump<br> (13-PP-701)<br> for the<br> stockpile<br> runoff pond. |
| --- | --- |
Elution Area
| • | A<br> new hot water<br> heater with 10<br> million BTU/h<br> capacity<br> (26-HF-701)<br> along with two<br> pumps<br> (26-PP-702/703),<br> hot water<br> surge vessel<br> (26-VS-701)<br> and two pumps<br> (26-PP-704/705),<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and two new<br> heat<br> exchangers<br> (26-HX-701/702). |
|---|---|
| • | New<br> loaded carbon<br> holding tank<br> (12 st<br> capacity<br> 26-TK-701) and<br> pump<br> (26-PP-701). |
| --- | --- |
| • | Two<br> new loaded<br> carbon<br> dewatering<br> screens<br> (26-SR-701/702)<br> to replace<br> existing<br> units. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new structure<br> and building<br> for handling<br> the cyanide<br> ISO<br> containers.<br> The system<br> also requires<br> a new cyanide<br> transfer pump<br> (25-PP-707)<br> and cyanide<br> off loading<br> sump pump<br> (25-PP-706). |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new air<br> receiver<br> (25-VS-701) to<br> supply high<br> pressure air<br> to the ISO<br> container. |
| --- | --- |
Cyanide Detoxification Area
| • | New<br> piping (14<br> in.) from<br> tailings<br> thickener feed<br> box<br> (F29-TAN-201)<br> to thickener<br> feed well. An<br> intermediate<br> feed box<br> (F29-TK-701)<br> also to be<br> installed. |
|---|---|
| • | Replacement<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> of the<br> existing<br> feedwell<br> (F29-AE-701)<br> with a new<br> unit. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new thickener<br> under flow<br> pump<br> (F29-PP-701)<br> and piping (12<br> inch) to<br> safety screen<br> distributor<br> box<br> (F29-CU-023) |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new pump box<br> (24-TK-701),<br> new pump<br> (24-PP-701),<br> and lines from<br> the screen<br> underflow to<br> the<br> detoxification<br> tanks and back<br> to tailings<br> discharge pump<br> box<br> (32-TK-001) |
| --- | --- |
| • | New<br> reagent pumps<br> for copper<br> sulfate<br> (25-PP-704/705)<br> and SMBS<br> (25-PP-701/702/703). |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new mix tank<br> (25-TK-701)<br> and agitator<br> (25-AG-701)<br> for copper<br> sulfate. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new copper<br> sulfate<br> storage tank<br> (25-TK-702). |
| --- | --- |
| • | Two<br> new cyanide<br> detoxification<br> tanks<br> (33-TK-703/704)<br> and agitators<br> (33-AG-703/704)<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> along with a<br> new discharge<br> pump<br> (33-PP-705). |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new 100 st<br> lime silo,<br> which will be<br> a complete<br> vendor package<br> to include a<br> lime silo,<br> transfer<br> pumps,<br> distribution<br> pumps, mix<br> tank and<br> agitator, and<br> storage tank<br> and agitator.<br> A new building<br> to house new<br> tanks and<br> pumps will<br> also be<br> required. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new lime sump<br> pump<br> (33-PP-706). |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> new air<br> compressor<br> (23-CA-701). |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-47 |
| --- | --- |

10.5.4.
ACTUAL
VS. MODELED
RECOVERIES
Mill gold and silver recovery models are developed using gravity and cyanidation test results on four Manh Choh master composites and 18 Manh Choh variability composites. A comparison between actual test recoveries and model calculated recoveries is provided in Table 10‑18 and Figure 10‑37.
TABLE 10‑18 ACTUAL VS. MODELED RECOVERIES
| Test ID | Sample<br><br> <br>ID | Au<br> Recovery, % | Ag<br> Recovery, % | NaCN<br><br> <br>Consumption<br><br> <br>lb/st | Lime<br><br> <br>Consumption<br><br> <br>lb/st | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test<br><br> <br>Actual | Model | Test<br><br> <br>Actual | Model | ||||
| AL-108 | MPOxC | 94.90 | 91.88 | 61.99 | 75.95 | 2.73 | 22.20 |
| AL-109 | MPSxC | 92.92 | 89.61 | 62.80 | 51.70 | 4.32 | 3.50 |
| AL-110 | NPOxC | 92.45 | 91.80 | 76.19 | 71.38 | 2.96 | 4.20 |
| AL-139 | NPSxC(1) | 91.90 | 94.96 | 72.84 | 60.28 | 1.97 | 0.20 |
| AL-121 | MPSxV1 | 81.93 | 90.92 | 44.17 | 55.49 | 2.05 | 4.00 |
| AL-122 | MPSxV2 | 88.65 | 89.82 | 56.31 | 53.14 | 3.51 | 6.40 |
| AL-123 | MPSxV3 | 91.21 | 91.12 | 62.85 | 51.43 | 2.16 | 3.90 |
| AL-124 | MPSxV4 | 87.21 | 85.18 | 29.69 | 41.43 | 2.87 | 4.00 |
| AL-144 | MPSxV5 | 93.98 | 90.59 | 72.17 | 65.40 | 5.67 | 15.10 |
| AL-126 | MPSxV6 | 89.28 | 88.09 | 51.35 | 50.31 | 1.62 | 4.40 |
| AL-145 | MPSxV7 | 89.76 | 90.51 | 46.17 | 52.22 | 6.81 | 17.40 |
| AL-128 | MPSxV8 | 91.38 | 93.22 | 53.88 | 49.76 | 3.32 | 4.00 |
| AL-129 | MPSxV9 | 91.21 | 89.22 | 38.47 | 53.97 | 0.54 | 4.00 |
| AL-149 | MPSxV10 | 62.40 | 68.03 | 47.70 | 54.14 | 11.90 | 25.30 |
| AL-131 | MPOxV1 | 94.05 | 90.53 | 56.38 | 61.02 | 2.73 | 12.90 |
| AL-132 | MPOxV2 | 96.73 | 94.74 | 75.15 | 68.03 | 1.18 | 16.40 |
| AL-133 | NPSxV1 | 92.62 | 96.04 | 74.83 | 72.53 | 1.32 | 5.00 |
| AL-134 | NPSxV2 | 86.69 | 92.15 | 76.22 | 65.38 | 2.03 | 5.00 |
| AL-135 | NPOxV1 | 90.77 | 93.04 | 71.63 | 80.36 | 1.08 | 11.20 |
| AL-136 | NPOxV2 | 97.74 | 87.58 | 72.19 | 66.21 | 0.82 | 8.70 |
| AL-137 | NPOxV3 | 93.16 | 96.77 | 81.57 | 83.30 | 1.01 | 6.20 |
| AL-138 | NPOxV4 | 92.52 | 87.68 | 73.22 | 74.22 | 1.26 | 5.10 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-48 | ||||||
| --- | --- |

Figure 10‑37 Actual vs. Modeled Recoveries

The average mill gold and silver recoveries are estimated based on gold and silver head grades, total sulfur and copper head grade. The recovery formulas are as follows:
Au recovery%
=
99.69 – 8.805
x 1.751 -Au head
ppm^^+
0.02677 x^%^^S^tot –
0.004927 x Cu head
ppm
Ag recovery%
= 53.47
+ 1.782 x ^Au head ppm^+
0.6496 x^^Ag head
ppm –
2.345 x
^%S^tot
where,
Au recovery% is the overall Manh Choh ore gold recovery, which includes gravity concentration recovery plus leaching recovery.
Ag recovery% is the overall Manh Choh ore gold recovery, which includes gravity concentration recovery plus leaching recovery.
Au head ppm is the gold head assay.
S tot is the total sulfur assay.
Cu head ppm is the copper head assay.
In addition, the gold recovery has a cap of 93.36%, and the silver recovery has a cap of 73.62%.
10.6. QUALIFIED PERSON’S OPINION ON MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING
The QP is of the opinion that the data derived from the testing activities described above are adequate for the purposes of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 10-49 |
|---|

- MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES
11.1. SUMMARY
Mineral
Resources have
been
classified in
accordance
with the
definitions
for Mineral
Resources in
S-K 1300. The
Mineral
Resources were
developed
using a
computer-based
block model
based on drill
hole assay
information
and geologic
interpretation
of the
mineralization
boundaries.
Mineral
Resources were
estimated
using the
block model
and open pit
design
software to
establish the
component of
the deposit
with
reasonable
prospects for
economic
extraction.
The Mineral
Resource block
model and
estimate were
prepared by
Kinross
Technical
Services \(KTS\)
and reviewed
by the
Contango QP.
The model was
based on
validated
drilling data
available
through June
2021.
Additional drilling
has been
completed on
the property
outside of the
resource area.
The Mineral Resources are contained within two deposits: MCS and MCN. There is an area southwest of MCS that contains several drill holes named Discovery Hill. The Discovery Hill area was not modeled for this block model and is not included in the stated Mineral Resources. The northwest end of the MCS deposit is referred to as MCW because there are structural offsets between MCS and MCW. The MCW mineralization was modeled incorporating those structural offsets, and it is tabulated as part of MCS on the resource tables. Figure 11‑1 illustrates the general location of the deposits, associated drill data, and extents of the block model used for the resource inventory.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-1 |
|---|

FIGURE 11‑1 LOCATION MAP OF MANH CHOH SOUTH AND NORTH DEPOSITS, MANH CHOH PROJECT, ALASKA

Table 11‑1 summarizes the Mineral Resource estimate for the Project effective December 31, 2022 on a 100% attributable ownership basis. Table 11-2 summarizes Contango’s portion of Project Mineral Resources (30% attributable basis).
TABLE 11‑1 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – PEAK GOLD 100% ATTRIBUTABLE OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au<br> Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag<br> Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 846 | 2.4 | 65 | 9.3 | 252 |
| TOTAL | 846 | 2.4 | 65 | 9.3 | 252 |
| Inferred | 21 | 3.8 | 3 | 9.2 | 6 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-2 | ||||
| --- | --- |

TABLE
11‑2 MINERAL
RESOURCE
ESTIMATE AS OF
DECEMBER 31,
2022 –
CONTANGO 30%
ATTRIBUTABLE
OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au<br> Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag<br> Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 254 | 2.4 | 20 | 9.3 | 76 |
| TOTAL | 254 | 2.4 | 20 | 9.3 | 76 |
| Inferred | 6 | 3.8 | 1 | 9.2 | 2 |
Notes for Tables 11-1 and 11-2:
| 1. | The<br> definitions<br> for Mineral<br> Resources in<br> S-K 1300 were<br> followed for<br> Mineral<br> Resources. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported exclusive<br> of Mineral<br> Reserves. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> estimated<br> using long<br> term prices of<br> US$1,600/oz Au<br> price and<br> US$22/oz. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported using<br> un-diluted Au<br> and Ag grades. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported<br> within<br> constraining<br> pit shells. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Mineral<br> Resources that<br> are not<br> Mineral<br> Reserves do<br> not have<br> demonstrated<br> economic<br> viability. |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported in<br> dry metric<br> tonnes. |
| --- | --- |
| 8. | Numbers<br> may not add<br> due to<br> rounding. |
| --- | --- |
The QP reviewed consensus long-term (10 year) metal price forecasts for gold and silver and verified that the selected metal prices for estimating Mineral Resources are in line with independent forecasts from banks and other lenders.
The QP is of the opinion that with consideration of the recommendations summarized in Sections 1 and 23 of this report, any issues relating to all relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction can be resolved with further work.
The estimates of Mineral Resources may be materially affected if mining, metallurgical, or infrastructure factors change from those currently anticipated at the Manh Choh Project. Although the QP has a reasonable expectation that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated or Measured Resources with continued exploration, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources have significant geological uncertainty and it should not be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be converted to the Measured or Indicated categories.
Mr. Sims, the QP, visited the site in August 2021. The QP worked with the Project staff to inspect core and surface outcrops, drill platforms, and sample cutting and logging areas, and discussed geology and mineralization.
11.2. RESOURCE
DATABASE
The database for the block model consists of completed and validated drill data as of August 13, 2021. There are 528 drill holes in the Tetlin Project database including 521 core holes and seven RC holes. Only diamond core drill holes within the areas defined as South (MCS), West (MCW), and North (MCN) are used for resource estimation highlighted in darker gray in Figure 11‑1. A total of 134 drill holes were excluded including seven dewatering RC holes, 18 core holes pending results as of the database cut-off date, and 109 drill holes from targets distal to the Manh Choh deposit. Table 11‑3 summarizes excluded drill holes not used in the block model. As a result, the actual number of drill holes used for modeling is 394 for a total of 69,574 m (228,260 ft) of assays.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-3 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑3 SUMMARY OF DRILL HOLES EXCLUDED FROM THE MODEL DATASET
| Dewatering<br><br> <br>RC<br> Holes<br><br> <br>(7) | Pending<br> Results<br><br> <br>Holes<br> (18) | Distal<br> Holes to the<br> Model Extents<br> (109) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TET21484 | TET21511 | TET11002 | TET12050 | TET15139 | TET17357 | TET17396 | TET18431 |
| TET21490 | TET21512 | TET11004 | TET12051 | TET15140 | TET17362 | TET17398 | TET18432 |
| TET21494 | TET21513 | TET11005 | TET12052 | TET15141 | TET17363 | TET17399 | TET18433 |
| TET21502 | TET21514 | TET11006 | TET12053 | TET15142 | TET17364 | TET17400 | TET18434 |
| TET21506 | TET21515 | TET11007 | TET12054 | TET15143 | TET17365 | TET17401 | TET18435 |
| TET21509 | TET21516 | TET11008 | TET12055 | TET15144 | TET17366 | TET17402 | TET18436 |
| TET21510 | TET21517 | TET11009 | TET12056 | TET15146 | TET17367 | TET18418 | TET18437 |
| TET21518 | TET11011 | TET13111 | TET15155 | TET17370 | TET18419 | TET18438 | |
| TET21519 | TET12012 | TET13115 | TET15156 | TET17372 | TET18420 | TET18439 | |
| TET21520 | TET12013 | TET13116 | TET15157 | TET17375 | TET18421 | TET18440 | |
| TET21521 | TET12014 | TET13128 | TET15180 | TET17377 | TET18422 | TET18441 | |
| TET21522 | TET12015 | TET15131 | TET16201 | TET17380 | TET18423 | TET18442 | |
| TET21523 | TET12024 | TET15132 | TET16202 | TET17382 | TET18424 | TET18443 | |
| TET21524 | TET12025 | TET15133 | TET16203 | TET17383 | TET18425 | TET19449 | |
| TET21525 | TET12026 | TET15134 | TET17352 | TET17384 | TET18426 | ||
| TET21526 | TET12027 | TET15135 | TET17353 | TET17387 | TET18427 | ||
| TET21527 | TET12028 | TET15136 | TET17354 | TET17391 | TET18428 | ||
| TET21528 | TET12029 | TET15137 | TET17355 | TET17392 | TET18429 | ||
| TET12030 | TET15138 | TET17356 | TET17394 | TET18430 |
Non-positive
values
indicative of
assay results
below
detection
limit were
replaced with
½ detection
limit. Missing
data was left
as null.
Additional
drilling
completed
after June
2021 was not
included in
the generation
of the block
model. The
.csv database
was validated
against
original logs,
historic
driller data,
and complete
assay
certificates.
Historic data
was validated
and compiled
for inclusion
in an acQuire
database with
coordination
translation to
US Survey
feet. Partial
relogging and
review of core
photographs
was completed
along with
normal
database
validation
procedures for
acQuire
database
implementation
in 2021. All
fire assay and
ICP
geochemical
data were
re-imported
from original
assay
certificates
during acQuire
database
implementation.
Historically
accepted
re-run assay
QA/QC data
were reviewed
with no
significant
discrepancies
or errors
found.
Drill hole data were loaded from .csv export files to Leapfrog software with inherent validation tools used to verify that no significant errors were present. Data were compared within original UTM meter and translated Alaska State Plane US Survey feet coordinate systems to ensure database integrity. Collar locations, downhole survey QA/QC consistency, original log comparisons, and FROM and TO interval comparisons were completed.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-4 |
|---|

Comprehensive
re-logging of
skarn
alteration was
completed in
2015 on
pre-2015 drill
data with
logging scheme
adopted
through 2021
drilling. No
significant
data errors or
material
inconsistencies
were noted in
large part due
to good
historic MS
Excel based
database
management and
recent
execution of
all drill
programs using
modern methods
and industry
best
practices.
11.3.
GEOLOGICAL
INTERPRETATION
The Manh Choh gold-copper mineralization is hosted by metasedimentary rocks consisting of mainly siliciclastic schist, which underwent complex folding and regional metamorphism. The folding appears to have concentrated calcareous components of the host rock along axial planes of the folding.
Later metasomatic events formed localized skarn bodies of varying degrees of alteration and mineralization textures and intensity within the schist. The fluids that formed the skarns likely also controlled the placement of the gold, silver, and copper mineralization. The distribution of gold, silver, and copper demonstrate hard boundaries with abrupt grade changes for the metals with relatively high grade within the mineralized skarn and lower grades outside of these zones. Mixed metasomatized skarn and schist intervals with elevated pathfinder geochemical elements are logged as minor skarn.
The drill hole ICP-ME geochemical data was used in 2021 by KTS (Ordóñez, 2021) to generate two cluster analyses of the deposit:
| • | Metal<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> zoning<br> characterization<br> was<br> established<br> using seven<br> isometric<br> log-ratio<br> coordinates<br> balancing<br> sulfur, gold,<br> arsenic,<br> molybdenum,<br> cobalt, and<br> bismuth<br> against other<br> metals. The<br> analysis<br> produced six<br> significant<br> clusters, with<br> three<br> characterizing<br> ore and three<br> characterizing<br> waste. The ore<br> and waste<br> clusters<br> individually<br> subdivide the<br> dataset<br> relative to<br> expected redox<br> boundaries. <br> The cluster<br> results were<br> reviewed in 3D<br> for<br> appropriateness<br> relative to<br> final domains. | |
|---|---|---|
| • | Lithogeochemistry<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> characterization<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> was<br> established<br> using three<br> isometric<br> log-ratio<br> coordinates of<br> mobile and<br> relatively<br> immobile<br> elements: | |
| --- | --- | |
| o | Ca,<br> Co | <br> MgVTiAlSc,<br> NiLaP |
| --- | --- | |
| o | Ca | <br> Co |
| --- | --- | |
| o | MgVTiAlSc | <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> NiLaP |
| --- | --- |
Five clusters were identified. Clusters 1, 2, and 3 represent gradational metasomatic alteration defined by variable cobalt and calcium content. Clusters 4 and 5 represent less altered background siliciclastic schist rock (Figure 11‑2).
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-5 |
|---|

FIGURE
11‑2
LITHOGEOCHEMICAL
CLUSTER
CHARACTERIZATION
OF MANH CHOH

The analysis suggests that the protolith for the deposit skarn alteration is from mixed siliciclastic and limited calcareous sediments. The analysis supports logged skarn alteration used to define the mineralization control and shows good correlation. Cluster 1 and Cluster 3 represent strong and moderate calc-silicate alteration, respectively, predominantly overprinting metal-poor, less altered but Ca-rich Cluster 4. Given the lithogeochemical clusters, 81% of Cluster 1 and 45% of Cluster 3 were logged as skarn. The reconciled distribution of lithogeochemical clusters for logged minor skarn and skarn lithologies is shown in Table 11‑4.
TABLE 11‑4 LITHOGEOCHEMICAL CLUSTER GIVEN LOGGED LITHOLOGY FOR SKARN AND MINOR SKARN
| Logged<br> Lithology | Cluster1_<br><br> <br>CoCaRich | Cluster2_<br><br> <br>CoMod_CaDepleted | Cluster3_<br><br> <br>CoMod_<br> CaRich | Cluster4_<br><br> <br>CoDepleted_CaRich | Cluster5_<br><br> <br>CoCaDepleted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minor<br> Skarn (100%) | 4% | 13% | 19% | 40% | 24% |
| Skarn<br> (100%) | 26% | 15% | 33% | 18% | 8% |
Cross section and 3D re-interpretation
of the skarn
and minor
skarn altered
lithology code
establishes
the general
geometry of
the
mineralization.
To simplify,
the logged
geologic codes
were grouped
by dominant
association
and
statistical
comparison for
consistency
and use in
constructing
the geologic
interpretation.
For example, a
calc schist
sub-code
\(“Calc schist”
71-90\)
indicates
mixed skarn
alteration
with less than
30% schist and
was grouped
with the
global “calc
schist” code.
The calc
schist
lithology was
used with
secondary
geochemical
data to group
with minor
skarn and
skarn
intervals.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-6 |
|---|

In 2021, select drill holes were re-logged on sections from both MCS and MCN and sections were infilled with a comprehensive review using core photographs. Paper cross sections for logged lithology, alteration, metal zonation, and other geologic features were constructed and geo-referenced for use in software interpretation.
Leapfrog
3D solid
wireframes
were developed
using drill
hole
geochemistry
and logged
skarn and calc
schist
lithology
interval
selections as
primary
controls and
with gold,
silver, and
copper grades
as secondary
controls.
Arsenic,
cobalt, and
iron were used
to inform
interval
selections to
form cohesive
estimation
domains.
Logged skarn,
minor skarn,
and gold
associated
calc schist
intervals not
included in
primary
domains were
grouped into
an isotropic
domain for
South and
North
encapsulating
discrete
modeled skarn
domains. The
minor skarn
domain is a
gradational
buffer zone
approximating
the
lithogeochemical
shift observed
in the cluster
analysis
\(Ordóñez,
2021\).
A 0.5 ft to 18.0 ft thick overburden domain was created respecting a minimum 0.5 ft offset to the 2020 drone Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) topographic surface. This interval of material has been reworked extensively for drill pads and access.
The overburden, skarn, and minor skarn domains were coded to drill holes to guide compositing and were coded to model blocks on a whole block basis from block centroids by priority (Figure 11‑3 and Figure 11‑4). The overburden domain supersedes skarn coding in composites and blocks below the topographic surface. The background QMS pelitic schist was subset by deposit by coding as 1 for South and 11 for North. The minor skarn was coded as 4 and 14 for South and North, respectively. The mineralized domain codes assigned to model blocks and composites follow the general priority (Table 11‑5):
| • | 9 =<br> Overburden<br> (OVB) |
|---|---|
| • | 201,<br> 205 = Primary<br> skarn South<br> (SKN) |
| --- | --- |
| • | 202,<br> 203, 204,<br> 206-212 =<br> Secondary<br> skarn South<br> (SKN) |
| --- | --- |
| • | 108,<br> 109 = Primary<br> skarn North<br> (SKN) |
| --- | --- |
| • | 101-107,<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 111-112 =<br> Secondary<br> skarn North<br> (SKN) |
| --- | --- |
| • | 4,14 =<br> Minor skarn<br> indicator<br> (MINSKN) |
| --- | --- |
| • | 1,11 =<br> Schist (QMS) |
| --- | --- |
Top of sulfide (fresh rock), transition, and oxide interval selections were also interpreted for redox domains. The interpretation was assessed for each drill hole in the model area using total sulfur within the ICP geochemistry data and reviewed against geologic logging of oxidation intensity of null/0-absent to 4-intense/complete oxidation. The redox interpretation includes:
| • | 4 =<br> oxide<br> (<0.1% S<br> with logged<br> oxidation<br> intensity<br> >0), |
|---|---|
| • | 3 =<br> transition<br> (>.1%S and<br> generally with<br> logged<br> oxidation<br> <4), and |
| --- | --- |
| • | 1 =<br> sulfide/fresh<br> (>0.25%S<br> and null<br> oxidation<br> intensity). |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-7 |
| --- | --- |

The contacts between sulfide/transition and transition/oxide define domain solids that were used to code the composites and model blocks on a nearest whole block basis. The redox domain boundaries are illustrated relative to block domains in Figure 11‑5.
Secondary
marble,
massive
sulfide, and
garnetiferous
schist
lithologic
domains were
generated but
are not used
in estimation
after
exploratory
data analysis
indicated
limited extent
and
statistical
correlation to
already
defined schist
and skarn
domains.
Structural
interpretation
and analysis
is still
ongoing to
better
constrain
folding and
fault
relationships
and their
influence on
the deposit
domains. SRK
\(2019\)
structural
interpretations
were used with
additional
2021 downhole
televiewer and
validated
oriented core
data to
influence the
modeled
domains for
potential
fault
offsets. The
overall
interpretation
of domains
conforms with
the pervasive
southwest
foliation
fabric except
in the MCS
deposit where
the skarn
logging at
depth suggests
an NE
continuity.
The primary
geologic
domains are of
high
confidence
given the
extent of
drilling data
in the deposit
areas.
TABLE 11‑5 DOMAIN FLAGGING
| Deposit<br> Category | Variable | Domain<br> Solid | Code | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global | DOMAIN | Global<br> Schist<br> (Default code) | 1,11 | 0 |
| Global | DOMAIN | LITHO-SKARNINDICATOR | 4,14 | 1 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-<br>LITHO-MIDDLEEARTHSKARN | 112 | 4 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP-3 | 111 | 5 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP3 | 101 | 6 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP2 | 103 | 8 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP1 | 104 | 9 |
| North<br> Primary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP-1 | 108 | 10 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP2.5 | 102 | 11 |
| North<br> Primary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP-1.5 | 109 | 12 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP0 | 107 | 13 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP0.5 | 105 | 14 |
| North<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-NP0.25 | 106 | 15 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MPSOUTHBLOB | 212 | 5 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MP_SKARN2 | 211 | 6 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MPLOWER3 | 210 | 7 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MPSKARNLOWER2_MERGE | 209 | 8 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MPLOWER1 | 208 | 9 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MPSKARNLOWER3_MERGE | 207 | 10 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MP_UPPERSWDIP2 | 206 | 11 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MP_UPPERSWDIP | 204 | 12 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MP_UPPERNEDIP | 202 | 13 |
| South<br> Secondary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MP_UPPERNEDIP1 | 203 | 14 |
| South<br> Primary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MP_UPPERSWDIP1 | 205 | 15 |
| South<br> Primary | DOMAIN | LITHO-MPSKARN1_MERGE | 201 | 16 |
| Global<br> Primary | DOMAIN | LITHO-OVERBURDEN | 9 | 17 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-8 | |||
| --- | --- |
FIGURE 11‑3 CROSS SECTION OF MANH CHOH SOUTH AND NORTH
SHOWING DOMAIN LITHOLOGY BLOCK AND DRILL HOLE CODE, LOOKING NORTHWEST

Figure
11‑4 Detail
of Manh Choh
South and
North Skarn
Domain Codes

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-9 |
|---|

FIGURE 11‑5 CROSS SECTION OF MANH CHOH SOUTH AND NORTH
SHOWING
REDOX BLOCK
AND DRILL HOLE
CODE, LOOKING
NORTHWEST

11.4. EXPLORATORY
DATA ANALYSIS
\(EDA\)
11.4.1. RAW STATISTICS
Initial
statistics
were completed
on raw assay
intervals
sorted by
deposit area
and by the
coded domains
described
under
Geological
Interpretation.
Leapfrog
software
statistical
tools were
used to
generate
general
histograms and
basic
statistics to
understand
relationships
between
various metals
and assist
with initial
domaining.
Additional
exploratory
data analysis
\(EDA\) was
completed in
MS Excel and
using
Supervisor
8.14.3
software.
Table 11‑6
summarizes
global
uncapped gold
and silver
assay data
within the
South and
North areas.
Skarn domains
which
exhibited
similar grade
distributions,
low assay
sample counts,
as well as
spatially
limited
domains, were
grouped
iteratively
during further
analysis and
in estimation.
Run length statistics for assay analytical data was reviewed. The mean length within the South and North deposit areas is 5.8 ft with a range from 0.2 ft to 40.0 ft (Figure 11‑6). Approximately 98% of the dataset has sample lengths from 1.0 ft to 10.4 ft with larger samples occurring rarely in areas outside the main resource zones. Samples of 4.9 ft to 5.1 ft and 9.91 ft to 10.14 ft lengths represent 19% and 14% of the dataset, respectively.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-10 |
|---|

FIGURE 11‑6 RAW RUN-LENGTH STATISTICS FOR VALID ASSAY DATA

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-11 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑6 UNCAPPED RAW ASSAY STATISTICS WITHIN MANH CHOH SOUTH AND NORTH
| Deposit | Number<br><br> <br>of<br><br> <br>Assays | Assay<br><br> <br>Length<br><br> <br>(m) | Assay<br><br> <br>Length<br><br> <br>(ft) | Mean | Standard<br><br> <br>Deviation | CV | Minimum* | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold<br> (g/t) | ||||||||
| South<br> & West | 21,724 | 37,443 | 122,844 | 0.844 | 5.110 | 6.1 | 0.0025 | 207.700 |
| North | 17,514 | 32,112 | 105,354 | 0.965 | 8.255 | 8.6 | 0.0025 | 416.000 |
| Total | 39,238 | 69,555 | 228,198 | 0.898 | 6.699 | 7.5 | 0.0025 | 416.000 |
| *<br> detection<br> limit of 0.005<br> g/t Au | ||||||||
| Silver<br> (g/t) | ||||||||
| South<br> & West | 21,724 | 37,443 | 122,844 | 3.43 | 19.07 | 5.6 | 0.25 | 828.00 |
| North | 17,514 | 32,112 | 105,354 | 4.70 | 34.67 | 7.4 | 0.25 | 3210.00 |
| Total | 39,238 | 69,555 | 228,198 | 4.00 | 27.17 | 6.8 | 0.25 | 3210.00 |
| *<br> detection<br> limit of 0.5<br> g/t Ag |
Correlation
matrices and
paired scatter
plots were
generated
between
various
elements to
determine
suitability
for possible
estimation
using similar
continuity
analysis.
Cobalt has a
moderate
correlation
for both the
MCS and MCN
deposits with
gold, with a
subset of the
MCS deposit
containing
higher grade
gold relative
to the
expected
log-log
distribution
\(Figure
11‑7\). Iron
and sulfur
show a strong
correlation,
and continuity
analysis for
sulfur was
used as a
basis for iron
percent
estimates.
FIGURE 11‑7 LOG SCATTERPLOT OF CAPPED AU ASSAYS AND COBALT AND CORRELATION MATRIX

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-12 |
|---|

11.4.2. OUTLIER MANAGEMENT AND CAPPING STRATEGY
Log probability plots and histograms of both raw assays and 10 ft. composites were developed by domain and zone. Raw assays, despite variable lengths, were used for capping prior to compositing. Plots for the MCS and MCN deposits were considered separately within and outside the 23 modeled skarn domains. Outside schist and minor skarn shared similar gold and silver distributions separate from overburden and skarn. Similar grade distributions supported combined capping strategies for domained primary and secondary skarn domains. MCS skarn was grouped as two primary and 10 secondary skarn domains and MCN skarn was grouped as three primary and nine secondary skarn domains. A different cap was applied for gold and silver after review of grouped domains based on visual breaks within log probability plots. Log probability plots illustrating capping analysis of several skarn domains is shown in Figure 11‑8.
The total number of capped gold assays was 49 (99.8^th^ percentile) for both MCS and MCN. Silver assays were similarly capped near the 99^th^ percentile of its respective data distributions. Assays outside skarn domains were retained and had higher capping levels for gold and silver to reduce the influence of outlier data. Anticipated metal loss due to capping is higher in overburden, schist, minor skarn, and secondary skarn domains. Capped data was reviewed visually for each domain to confirm that further domain segregation of higher grade continuity was warranted. Table 11‑7 illustrates the cap values that were applied to gold and silver raw assay data.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-13 |
|---|

FIGURE
11‑8 GOLD
CAPPING LOG
PROBABILITY
PLOTS FOR
SOUTH PRIMARY
SKARN \(UPPER\)
AND NORTH
SKARN \(LOWER\)

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-14 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑7 MANH CHOH ASSAY CAPPING STRATEGY
| Deposit | Domain | Gold<br> Cap<br><br> (g/t) | Silver<br> Cap<br><br> <br>(g/t) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global | 1- QMS<br> schist | 10 | 100 |
| Global | 4 -<br> Minor Skarn | 10 | 100 |
| Global | 9-OVB<br> over-burden | 1 | 20 |
| North | 102<br> North Skarn | 70 | 300 |
| North | 108<br> North Skarn | 120 | 200 |
| North | 109<br> North Skarn | 120 | 200 |
| North | 100s<br> North<br> Secondary<br> Skarn | 70 | 200 |
| South | 201<br> South Skarn | 80 | 300 |
| South | 205<br> South Skarn | 80 | 100 |
| South | 200s<br> South<br> Secondary<br> Skarn | 20 | 100 |
Overall,
capping
followed the
outlier
management
strategies
used in the
previous
estimate. In
addition to
capping, high
yield
restrictions
of capped
composite data
were used to
reduce the
influence of
higher grades
beyond local
data support
\(see Grade
Interpolation\).
Capped assays
were inspected
visually to
ensure
outliers were
spatially
distributed
and not part
of a potential
sub-domain.
Additional
estimates were
generated for
non-economic
metals and
elements
included in
the ICP
dataset
without
capping,
including
arsenic,
calcium
percent,
cobalt,
copper, iron
percent, and
sulfur
percent. The
distribution
for sulfur
percent
multi-element
data includes
495 results
for which no
over-limit
analyses were
completed
above the
maximum
detection
limit of
10.0%. Local
portions of
high-grade
sulfur zones
may be biased
low. A total
of 122
pre-2021 and
forty 2021
over-limit
analyses were
completed with
an average of
13.8% S and
these results
were
incorporated
in the
estimate.
Raw ICP geochemistry data for arsenic includes 719 samples at the maximum detection limit of 10,000 ppm As with no over-limit analyses. These isolated samples are largely mitigated with compositing and block estimation but some high arsenic zones of the deposits may be biased low. In 2021, a selection of 77 over-limit samples were analyzed and resulted in an average over-limit analysis of 20,826 ppm As. The 77 over-limit samples were incorporated in the estimate.
The Project’s raw and capped statistics by domain are summarized in Table 11‑8 for gold and Table 11‑9 for silver.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-15 |
|---|

TABLE
11‑8 MANH
CHOH UNCAPPED
AND CAPPED
GOLD ASSAY
STATISTICS BY
DOMAIN AND
DEPOSIT
| Gold<br><br> (g/t<br> Au) | All | 1- QMS<br><br> <br>schist | 4 -<br><br> <br>Minor<br><br> <br>Skarn | 9 - OVB<br><br> <br>Over-<br><br> <br>burden | 102 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 108 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 109 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 100s -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Secondary<br><br> <br>Skarn | 201 -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Skarn | 205 -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Skarn | 200s -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Secondary<br><br> <br>Skarn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncapped | |||||||||||
| Samples | 39,238 | 22,009 | 8,953 | 151 | 342 | 517 | 389 | 1,982 | 2,323 | 813 | 1,759 |
| Minimum | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Maximum | 416.000 | 64.200 | 8.930 | 49.000 | 84.500 | 151.500 | 371.000 | 416.000 | 178.500 | 207.700 | 149.500 |
| Mean | 0.900 | 0.030 | 0.060 | 0.530 | 2.190 | 6.570 | 13.300 | 3.520 | 4.720 | 5.330 | 1.370 |
| SD | 2.909 | 0.540 | 0.260 | 4.030 | 6.090 | 16.600 | 38.620 | 13.290 | 11.420 | 13.190 | 5.710 |
| CV | 13.4 | 21.0 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 4.2 |
| 98% | 8.330 | 0.130 | 0.470 | 2.430 | 17.230 | 58.800 | 100.750 | 22.350 | 33.190 | 40.480 | 10.160 |
| 99% | 19.700 | 0.340 | 0.840 | 5.810 | 22.830 | 89.540 | 169.960 | 37.330 | 54.720 | 67.530 | 16.320 |
| Capped | |||||||||||
| Samples | 39,238 | 22,009 | 8,953 | 151 | 342 | 517 | 389 | 1,982 | 2,323 | 813 | 1,759 |
| Cap<br> Count | 49 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
| Capped % | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.3% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 1.5% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Minimum | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Maximum | 120.000 | 10.000 | 8.930 | 1.000 | 70.000 | 120.000 | 120.000 | 70.000 | 80.000 | 80.000 | 20.000 |
| Mean | 0.832 | 0.020 | 0.060 | 0.120 | 2.150 | 6.500 | 11.190 | 3.200 | 4.600 | 5.150 | 1.130 |
| SD | 2.012 | 0.170 | 0.260 | 0.270 | 5.550 | 16.040 | 24.840 | 7.760 | 10.110 | 11.250 | 2.820 |
| CV | 5.8 | 7.9 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-16 | ||||||||||
| --- | --- |

TABLE 11‑9 MANH CHOH UNCAPPED AND CAPPED SILVER ASSAY STATISTICS BY DOMAIN AND DEPOSIT
| Silver<br><br> (g/t<br> Ag) | All | 1- QM<br><br> <br>schist | 4 -<br><br> <br>Minor<br><br> <br>Skarn | 9 - OVB<br><br> <br>Over-<br><br> <br>burden | 102 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 108 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 109 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 100s -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Secondary<br><br> <br>Skarn | 201 -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Skarn | 205 -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Skarn | 200s -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Secondary<br><br> <br>Skarn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncapped | |||||||||||
| Samples | 39,238 | 22,009 | 8,953 | 151 | 342 | 517 | 389 | 1,982 | 2,323 | 813 | 1,759 |
| Minimum | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Maximum | 3210.00 | 626.00 | 469.00 | 94.10 | 656.00 | 428.00 | 3210.00 | 927.00 | 828.00 | 778.00 | 783.00 |
| Mean | 4.00 | 0.88 | 1.76 | 2.76 | 32.36 | 15.39 | 27.30 | 17.03 | 14.22 | 12.85 | 8.20 |
| SD | 27.17 | 7.11 | 7.63 | 7.95 | 60.72 | 32.79 | 181.29 | 47.75 | 42.00 | 35.18 | 30.30 |
| CV | 6.8 | 8.1 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 6.6 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 3.7 |
| 98% | 29.20 | 4.00 | 9.80 | 10.65 | 189.70 | 93.26 | 142.55 | 125.45 | 120.96 | 63.17 | 50.02 |
| 99% | 68.60 | 8.80 | 19.55 | 14.52 | 258.00 | 145.49 | 597.03 | 208.62 | 190.08 | 103.27 | 104.04 |
| Capped | |||||||||||
| Samples | 39,238 | 22,009 | 8,953 | 151 | 342 | 517 | 389 | 1,982 | 2,323 | 813 | 1,759 |
| Cap<br> Count | 81 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 21 | 6 | 9 | 19 |
| Capped % | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Minimum | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Maximum | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 20.00 | 300.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 300.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Mean | 3.56 | 0.81 | 1.68 | 2.27 | 31.01 | 14.77 | 13.65 | 15.29 | 13.59 | 11.29 | 6.85 |
| SD | 8.95 | 3.51 | 4.97 | 3.12 | 50.60 | 26.92 | 33.66 | 32.37 | 34.21 | 17.71 | 15.08 |
| CV | 3.6 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-17 | ||||||||||
| --- | --- |

11.4.3. COMPOSITING
Raw assay length intervals are predominantly less than or equal to 10 ft. Compositing of capped assay analytical data including gold and silver as well as uncapped arsenic, calcium, cobalt, copper, iron percent, and sulfur percent is completed at nominal 10.0 ft lengths for both deposits. A total of 283 non-sampled intervals for 2,312 ft were excluded from compositing. Only 394 holes within the model extent were used for compositing excluding holes from the Discovery target and other distal targets.
Compositing
is completed
on a
run-length
downhole basis
in Vulcan
2021.3
starting from
the top of
hole or first
analytical
sample to the
bottom sample
depth.
Composites
were completed
respecting the
‘domain’
variable back
flagged to the
raw assay
data.
Composite
intervals less
than 1.0 ft
were merged
with the
previous
composite to
reduce small
composite
influence in
the estimate.
Approximately
86% of
composites are
10 ft long,
with 11% of
composites
shorter than
10 ft retained
to honor
narrow
geometries
with hard
boundaries
\(Figure 11‑9\).
The remaining
3% larger than
10 ft assay
intervals were
primarily due
to short
interval
merging at the
end of holes
and larger
samples taken
outside the
mineralized
areas.
Composites
larger than 11
ft and smaller
than 9 ft were
checked
visually
against gold
grade and no
bias was
noted.
FIGURE 11‑9 COMPOSITE LENGTH STATISTICS

Statistics
for capped
composites for
gold and
silver are
presented in
Table 11‑10.
Capped
composites
were visually
inspected
relative to
the entire
composite
dataset for
appropriateness.
Composite
variable ‘ORE’
matches block
‘DOMAIN’, and
‘GEOCD2’ is
domain back
flagged
lithology
simplified to
overburden
\(9\), schist
\(1\), minor
skarn \(4\), and
primary and
secondary
domain skarn
\(5\).
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-18 |
|---|

An external distance to composites software was run to calculate the average drill hole and composite spacing of the deposit areas. The MCS deposit area averages 69 ft drill hole spacing from 220 holes. The MCN deposit area averages 90.9 ft drill hole spacing from 184 holes.
Composites
for arsenic,
calcium,
cobalt,
copper, iron
percent, and
sulfur percent
were completed
for the entire
drill dataset
as part of the
gold and
silver
composite
dataset.
Cell declustering was completed on composites using Supervisor software at 160 ft x 160 ft x 20 ft to generate declustering weights to reduce the influencing of tightly drilled areas in non-kriging estimates. This resulted in a declustered mean of 0.283 g/t Au globally versus raw capped mean of 0.641 g/t Au (Figure 11‑10).
FIGURE 11‑10 CELL DECLUSTERING OF CAPPED COMPOSITES

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-19 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑10 MANH CHOH GLOBAL CAPPED COMPOSITE STATISTICS
| Gold<br><br> <br>Composites<br><br> <br>(g/t) | All | 1- QMS<br> schist | 4 -<br><br> <br>Minor<br><br> <br>Skarn | 9 - OVB<br> over-<br><br> <br>burden | 102 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 108 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 109 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 100s -<br> North<br><br> <br>Secondary<br><br> <br>Skarn | 201 -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Skarn | 205 -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Skarn | 200s -<br> South<br> Secondary<br><br> <br>Skarn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composites | 23,793 | 14,140 | 5,405 | 136 | 162 | 285 | 207 | 1,051 | 1,054 | 410 | 943 |
| Minimum | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Maximum | 120.000 | 3.995 | 6.420 | 2.505 | 11.250 | 84.032 | 120.000 | 57.222 | 75.170 | 67.959 | 20.000 |
| Mean | 0.662 | 0.018 | 0.062 | 0.118 | 1.773 | 5.822 | 10.492 | 3.139 | 4.628 | 4.553 | 1.044 |
| SD | 1.315 | 0.089 | 0.179 | 0.295 | 2.523 | 10.700 | 20.585 | 6.250 | 8.513 | 8.450 | 2.225 |
| CV | 4.0 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| 98% | 6.421 | 0.124 | 0.461 | 0.979 | 8.621 | 29.469 | 76.415 | 20.044 | 30.539 | 28.476 | 7.386 |
| 99% | 16.763 | 0.263 | 0.740 | 1.000 | 11.180 | 50.716 | 97.954 | 33.510 | 36.241 | 39.533 | 11.090 |
| Silver<br><br> <br>Composites<br><br> <br>(g/t) | All | 1- QMS<br> schist | 4 -<br><br> <br>Minor<br><br> Skarn | 9 - OVB<br><br> <br>over-<br><br> <br>burden | 102 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 108 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 109 -<br><br> <br>North<br><br> <br>Skarn | 100s -<br> North<br> Secondary<br><br> <br>Skarn | 201 -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Skarn | 205 -<br><br> <br>South<br><br> <br>Skarn | 200s -<br> South<br> Secondary<br><br> <br>Skarn |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Composites | 23,793 | 14,140 | 5,405 | 136 | 162 | 285 | 207 | 1,051 | 1,054 | 410 | 943 |
| Minimum | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Maximum | 254.70 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 45.16 | 181.41 | 148.53 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 254.70 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Mean | 2.94 | 0.70 | 1.56 | 2.57 | 26.93 | 14.44 | 13.19 | 14.97 | 13.39 | 11.31 | 6.00 |
| SD | 11.53 | 2.29 | 3.69 | 4.65 | 35.99 | 19.72 | 29.54 | 28.57 | 29.10 | 15.55 | 11.51 |
| CV | 2.8 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| 98% | 24.41 | 3.50 | 9.29 | 12.34 | 130.49 | 69.62 | 104.56 | 96.77 | 107.64 | 58.00 | 39.48 |
| 99% | 52.12 | 6.59 | 16.67 | 15.66 | 163.26 | 76.02 | 152.73 | 157.20 | 167.01 | 74.37 | 63.77 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-20 | ||||||||||
| --- | --- |

11.4.4. CONTACT ANALYSIS
Boundary
conditions
were checked
within the
composited
dataset for
gold and
silver. The
major boundary
conditions
considered
were the
contacts
between
overburden
\(9\), QMS
pelitic schist
\(1\), minor
skarn \(4\),
South skarn
\(200s\), and
North skarn
\(100s\). Redox
domains were
treated as
open or soft
boundaries for
a secondary
control to
composite
selections.
The overburden profile is generally composed of limited soils over heavily fractured bedrock. Overburden has a one-way soft boundary to QMS pelitic schist and minor skarn allowing estimates of overburden to project 20 ft (6.1 m) into underlying bedrock for composites.
The contact between background QMS pelitic schist and the indicator minor skarn domain is gradational and suggests no boundary consistent with the mixed skarn logging and gradational alteration noted at the margins of the true skarn altered domains. To reduce the influence of higher grade composites, the QMS pelitic schist generally used a 45 ft (13.7 m) soft boundary to minor skarn but the minor skarn estimates were open to lower grade QMS pelitic schist.
Contact
plots for both
North and
South suggest
a hard
boundary
between
primary skarn
domains to QMS
pelitic schist
and to the
minor skarn
domain.
Intersecting
domains
suggesting
possible fold
thrust
continuity
between skarn
domains have
soft or open
boundary
conditions
between them.
For example,
primary MCS
domain 205 has
a two-way soft
boundary with
domain 204,
one-way soft
boundary with
domain 203,
and open
boundary with
secondary
domain 206.
Contact
plots for
secondary
skarn domains,
which are
narrower and
exhibit
gradational
contacts in
drill core and
lower average
gold and
silver grades,
show one-way
soft
boundaries
where average
grades inside
and outside
the domain are
relatively
similar. This
relationship
is
particularly
apparent for
more distal
secondary
skarn domains.
Some estimates
for secondary
skarn domains
are one-way
soft allowing
use of minor
skarn and
pelitic schist
composites in
estimation.
Secondary
domains
exhibit hard
boundaries to
primary skarn
domains.
Example
boundary
condition
contact plots
are presented
in Figure
11‑11.
Boundary
conditions
appropriate
for gold were
confirmed for
other elements
estimated,
supported by
the geologic
interpretation
of the skarn
altered
lithology
encapsulating
the
predominant
metal zonation
of the
deposits.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-21 |
|---|

FIGURE 11‑11 COMPOSITE CONTACT PLOT OF GOLD WITHIN ESTIMATE DOMAINS

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-22 |
|---|

11.4.5. DENSITY
Specific
gravity
sampling in
the core shack
was carried
out on a
regular basis
as outlined in
subsection
8.2. Previous
models used
averaged
domain
densities
based on
lithology and
the top of
sulfide
contact
separately for
MCS and MCN.
An additional
reduction
factor was
applied to
better reflect
in situ bulk
density with
high
alteration and
weathering.
The specific
gravity tests
are typically
conducted on
spot samples
of relatively
intact rock,
as density
sampling is
complicated in
areas where
rock strength
is low due to
alteration and
faulting.
In 2020 and 2021, density measurement frequency was increased with additional samples taken at major geologic boundaries. Pre-2020 density sample frequency was approximately one measurement every 79 ft and was increased to an average of one measurement every 22 ft from 2020 onwards. An additional 1,204 measurements were taken in the model area in 2020 and 2021 representing 37% of all model area density measurements.
Density
data
distribution
is reasonable
across the
model area,
based on 355
of the core
drill holes
with 3,278
individual
density
measurements.
The mean of
model area
specific
gravity
measurements
was 2.72 g/cm^3^
with a range
from 1.51 g/cm^3^
to 4.98 g/cm^3^.
Within logged
skarn
alteration
domains
characterizing
the ore, the
mean density
is 2.83 g/cm^3^
with North
mean density
of 2.60 g/cm^3^
and South mean
density of
3.02 g/cm^3^.
The density
data were
subdivided by
deposit, skarn
domain, and
redox domain
and grouped
into 17
subsets.
Visual
inspection of
the domain
coded approach
showed
over-smoothing
of density
measurements.
To better
represent
variable
densities
throughout the
deposit, a
domained
estimate of
density was
generated as
outlined in
later in
subsection
11.5.5.
11.5. BLOCK
MODELLING AND
GRADE
ESTIMATION
The geologic interpretation for MCS and MCN was developed in Leapfrog software version 6.0. The block model and estimation were completed in Vulcan software version 2021.3.
11.5.1. BLOCK MODEL SETUP
The block model was developed using blocks sized 20 ft (6.1 m) x 20 ft (6.1 m) on plan with a 10 ft (3.0 m) bench height. The block size was selected to honor the discrete, moderate dipping grade distributions and skarn domains while respecting a reasonable expected minimum mining unit. The model was sub-blocked to a minimum size of 5 ft x 5 ft x 5 ft (1.52 m x 1.52 m x 1.52 m) to accommodate small volume domains. The sub-blocked model was reblocked after metal estimation to 20 ft x 20 ft x 10 ft (6.1 m x 6.1 m x 3.1 m) block size to produce a regular block size for use in Minesight planning software. Density was estimated into the regularized blocks model.
The mineralization within the MCS and MCN deposits generally strikes northwest (315°). To improve the representation of the geologic contacts, the block model is rotated 45° to align with the strike of the mineralized material and perpendicular to the azimuth orientations of the majority of drilling at both deposits. Figure 11‑1 illustrates the modeled area as the darker gray area over the area topography. Table 11‑11 provides the model location parameters and extent. The model has been developed in the Alaska State Plane (NAD83) coordinate system. The model area excludes the Discovery prospect.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-23 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑11 MODEL SETUP PARAMETERS
| Parameter | |
|---|---|
| Block<br> Origin Easting^1^ | 1,495,300 |
| Block<br> Origin<br> Northing^1^ | 3,357,600 |
| Block<br> Origin<br> Elevation^1^ | 2,200 |
| Columns | 160 |
| Rows | 175 |
| Levels | 60 |
| Reblock<br> Block Count | 1,680,000 |
| Reblock<br> Block Size<br> (ft) | 20 x 20<br> x 20 |
| Reblock<br> Block Size (m) | 6.1 x<br> 6.1 x 6.1 |
| Z-Axis<br> Rotation<br> (Vulcan) | 315° |
Note.
- Alaska State Plane Zone 2 grid coordinates in US Survey feet
11.5.2. BLOCK SEARCH ANISOTROPY
Vulcan
software’s
Unfolding
module was
used to
generate block
search
anisotropy to
provide
variable
search
orientations
within the
anastomosing
estimate
domains
respecting
dominant
continuity
direction and
overall schist
fabric within
the MCS and
MCN deposits.
The orebody
has a general
NW strike and,
to simplify,
no plunge
control was
estimated.
The tool
allows for the
creation of
“bearing”,
“plunge”, and
“dip” rotation
angles from
the Z-axis,
Y-axis, and
Z-axis
respectively
based on back
flagging of
the 3D spatial
orientations
of
triangulation
faces. The
result
generally
varies plunge
and dip but
respects the
major axis
strike by
electing a
preferred
major
direction
during setup.
Leapfrog
generated
reference
surfaces
approximating
the
generalized
centerline
planar trend
of a domain as
well as
footwall and
hangingwall
triangulated
surfaces were
considered.
Reference
surfaces
extend beyond
the desired
back flagged
block extents
to ensure no
edge effects
produce
unwanted
orientations.
Filtering of
triangle
complexity in
Vulcan is
completed to
simplify the
orientations
coded to
blocks. The
parameters
used to code
all model
blocks are
outlined in
Table 11‑12.
The block
variables
coded are
‘bear’,
‘plung’, and
‘dip’.
The global anisotropy used to code model block search rotations was based on foliation structural trend surfaces generated using available oriented core and televiewer foliation measurements. An upper (FOL_globa_with_TV_-_0_25_FILTER) and lower (FOL_globa_with_TV_-_-0_75FILTER) trend surface were used to blend orientations which fit the foliation measurement data and best approximated the fabric orientations anticipated in MCS and MCN (Figure 11‑12). The preferred major direction aligns with variogram parameters for the QMS pelitic schist with major axis aligned 182.2°.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-24 |
|---|

Within
the skarn
domains, the
overall
geometry
respects the
foliation
fabric of the
schist and
interpreted
orientations
of the skarn
alteration.
The lower
portion of the
MCS deposit
including
primary domain
201 uses two
surface
blended
orientation.
The upper
surface is
consistent
with foliation
fabric from a
relatively
flat southwest
dipping
reference
surface
\(Litho\_-\_MP\_upperSWdip\_RefSurf\).
The lower
surface
follows a
moderate
northeast
dipping
reference
surface
\(HG\_Select\_-\_HG7\_RefSurf\).
The variogram
and continuity
for silver
shows major
strike
oriented
305°. Prior
to estimating
silver, the
block search
anisotropy
parameter
‘mpskarn1ag’
is run to
align the
major search
axis.
TABLE 11‑12 BLOCK SEARCH ANISOTROPY PARAMETERS
| Name | Deposit | Domains | Preferred<br><br> <br>Major<br><br> <br>Direction<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> (°) | Upper<br> Triangulation | Lower<br> Triangulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global | all | all,<br> non-overburden | 182 | FOL_globa_with_TV_-_0_25_FILTER | FOL_globa_with_TV_-_-0_75FILTER |
| Mpupper | South | 204,205,206 | 305 | upperSWdip1_RefSurf | upperSWdip_RefSurf |
| mpskarn1 | South | 201,207,208,209,210 | 335 | Litho_-_MP_upperSWdip_RefSurf | HG_Select_-_HG7_RefSurf |
| mpskarn1ag | South | 201,207,208,209,210 | 305 | Litho_-_MP_upperSWdip_RefSurf | HG_Select_-_HG7_RefSurf |
| MPNEs | South | 202,203,211 | 305 | Litho_-_MP_upperSWdip_RefSurf | HG_Select_-_HG7_RefSurf |
| nPupper | North | 108,109,110,111 | 315 | Litho_-_NP-3_RefSurf. | Litho_-_NP-1_RefSurf. |
| Nplower | North | 101-107 | 315 | Litho_-_NP0_FW_FILTER. | Litho_-_NP2_5_Footwall. |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-25 | ||||
| --- | --- |

FIGURE 11‑12 BLOCK SEARCH ANISOTROPY DETAIL WITH IDEALIZED SEARCH ELLIPSOIDS ELONGATED ALONG STRIKE

11.5.3. VARIOGRAPHY
AND CONTINUITY
ANALYSIS
Variograms
were tabulated
for all
estimated
metals and
elements
including
gold, silver,
copper,
arsenic,
calcium,
sulfur, iron,
and cobalt.
Continuity
analysis
defined
anisotropy
within the
separate
datasets for
MCS and MCN.
Declustered
capped 10 ft
composites
were used to
generate
variograms for
gold and
silver and
non-declustered
capped
composites
were used for
other metals.
Variography
was performed
in Supervisor
software for
each domain
separately and
for grouped
domains with
low composite
counts to
ensure
sufficient
data support.
Variograms
were modeled
with two
structures in
non-transformed
space where
possible and
back
transformed
normal scores
structures
were
appropriate.
Nuggets for
all variograms
were obtained
from the
downhole
variogram of
10 ft
composites. An
example gold
variogram for
South primary
skarn domain
201 is shown
in Figure
11‑13. While
the geometry
of domain 201
is striking
northwest and
has an
apparent
northeast dip,
review of core
and structural
interpretations
of the fabric
suggests that
dominant metal
continuity is
to the SW
consistent
with upper
South domain
205 and with
the MCN
deposit in
general. Gold
variograms
exhibited
variable
continuity
orientations
throughout the
deposits.
Attempts to
use gold
variograms for
specific
domains for
silver did not
produce
acceptable
continuity
models and
more
generalized
variograms
were
generated.
Table 11‑13
shows
structure 2
variogram
parameters for
gold and
silver for
both the MCS
and MCN
deposits.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-26 |
|---|

Arsenic, calcium, copper, and sulfur normal space variograms were simplified to the general orientation of greatest continuity with a northwest major strike direction (305°) and shallow (10°) to moderate (25°) dip with no plunge. Continuity analysis for arsenic, calcium, and sulfur suggested local shallow (-10°) NE dips in the deeper portions of the MCS pit within skarn domains 201, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, and 212.
Kriging
Neighborhood
Analysis \(KNA\)
was used on
the MCS and
MCN domains to
assess
appropriate
estimation
parameters.
Blocks at a
parent size of
20 ft x 20 ft
x 10 ft with
composite
counts greater
than four
showed kriging
efficiencies
above 80%.
The analysis
for several
domains did
not show
significant
changes with
search ellipse
size. A 3 x 3
x 3
discretization
was chosen for
all estimates
based on the
results.
TABLE 11‑13 VARIOGRAM PARAMETERS FOR GOLD AND SILVER
| Rotation<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> (°) | Range<br> (ft) | Range<br> (m) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain<br> /Deposit | Nugget | Sill | Bearing | Plunge | Dip | Major | Semi | Minor | Major | Semi | Minor |
| Gold<br> Variogram<br> Parameters<br> (Structure 2) | |||||||||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 201, 211 | 0.092 | 0.5027 | 335.2 | 14.9 | -1.3 | 325 | 430 | 145 | 99.1 | 131.1 | 44.2 |
| 202,<br> 203, 212 | 0.105 | 0.5879 | 307.5 | -9.8 | -28.5 | 750 | 445 | 76 | 228.6 | 135.6 | 23.2 |
| 204,<br> 205, 206 | 0.094 | 0.3256 | 305.0 | 0.0 | -10.0 | 530 | 370 | 105 | 161.5 | 112.8 | 32.0 |
| 207,<br> 208, 209, 210 | 0.091 | 0.4706 | 232.5 | 21.5 | 166.9 | 170 | 240 | 80 | 51.8 | 73.2 | 24.4 |
| 1,4/<br> South | 0.192 | 0.2224 | 182.2 | -18.9 | -16.7 | 283 | 400 | 180 | 86.3 | 121.9 | 54.9 |
| 100s<br> North | 0.105 | 0.4166 | 66.3 | 35.6 | -19.5 | 380 | 225 | 105 | 115.8 | 68.6 | 32.0 |
| 1,4/<br> North | 0.167 | 0.3018 | 182.2 | -18.9 | -16.7 | 280 | 310 | 140 | 85.3 | 94.5 | 42.7 |
| Silver<br> Variogram<br> Parameters<br> (Structure 2) | |||||||||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 200s<br> South | 0.074 | 0.3167 | 305.0 | 0 | -10 | 360 | 310 | 180 | 109.7 | 94.5 | 54.9 |
| 1, 4 /<br> Global | 0.237 | 0.2297 | 182.2 | -18.89 | -16.69 | 365 | 315 | 160 | 111.3 | 96.0 | 48.8 |
| 100s<br> North | 0.128 | 0.6102 | 66.33 | 35.63 | -19.53 | 520 | 440 | 220 | 158.5 | 134.1 | 67.1 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-27 | ||||||||||
| --- | --- |

FIGURE 11‑13 EXAMPLE NORMAL SCORES BACK-TRANSFORM VARIOGRAM FOR SOUTH PRIMARY SKARN (DOMAIN 201)

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-28 |
|---|

11.5.4. GRADE ESTIMATION
Alternative
methods of
grade
estimation
were evaluated
before
selecting the
inverse
distance cubed
method \(ID^3^\).
Ordinary
linear kriging
\(OK\), inverse
distance
squared \(ID^2^\),
and nearest
neighbor \(NN\)
estimates were
compared with
ID^3^
as options for
grade
estimation. OK
appeared to
“over-smooth”
the block
grades,
meaning that
the block
variance
between blocks
was less than
what would be
predicted by
inverse
distance
methods.
Additional
refinement
will be needed
to apply a
Localized
Uniform
Conditioning
\(LUC\)
non-linear
estimate as
localized
results from
panel
estimates
appeared to
“over-smooth”
similar to OK
results.
Table 11‑14 summarizes
the ID^3^
gold grade
estimation
parameters.
Search
distances
varied from
240 ft to 500
ft along the
longest axis
for all gold
estimates. All
search
orientations
use the block
search
anisotropy
reflecting
major axis
orientations
and
generalized
ellipse radii
from
variography
\(Figure
11‑14\). A
table of soft
boundary
conditions
used for gold
composite
selections is
presented in
Table 11‑16.
In general,
soft
boundaries
used a
generalized
search
orientation
based on
domain
variography
and search of
45 ft x 45 ft
x 15 ft
depending on
domain and
boundary
conditions.
The estimates
used composite
counts of:
| • | Maximum<br> Composites =<br> 10 |
|---|---|
| • | Minimum<br> Composites = 3 |
| --- | --- |
| • | Maximum<br> per Drill Hole<br> = 2 |
| --- | --- |
The search composite counts were refined iteratively and informed with initial KNA using Supervisor during EDA. A 3 x 3 x 3 discretization was used for all estimates.
Search
limits were
established to
limit the
interpolation
on higher gold
grade values
based on
visual and
statistical
breaks in
grades seen in
the raw assay
data. Figure
11‑8
illustrates
gold assay
distribution
breaks
observed below
the capping
limit for
primary skarn
domains.
Composites
with gold
values greater
than
thresholds
presented in
Table 11‑14
were
restricted to
a 60 ft x 60
ft x 20 ft
search
ellipse. The
ellipse size
approximates
1/2 drill hole
spacing for
both deposits
on average.
For example,
domain 201
gold assays
were capped at
80 g/t prior
to
compositing.
Composites
greater than
50 g/t Au were
only
interpolated
in blocks
within a 60 ft
x 60 ft x 20
ft ellipse
which selected
the composite
using the
specified
parameters
\(Figure
11‑15\). No
high grade
restrictions
were used for
silver or
other
estimates.
Based on drill hole coverage across the entire block model, gold estimates were completed for greater than 99% of domain coded blocks in primary skarn domains, 95% of domain coded blocks in secondary skarn and minor skarn domains, and 55% of blocks in background QMS pelitic schist estimate 55% of blocks.
The overburden and cleanup estimate passes use two minimum composites. To ensure all blocks are estimated within 400 ft) of a drill hole, a cleanup pass (PASS=2) excluding overburden composites is estimated using a minimum of two composites from one drill hole. The cleanup pass uses background schist and minor skarn composites with a soft boundary 45 ft x 45 ft x 15 ft ellipsoid into higher grade skarn composites within secondary domain variable ‘GEOCD2’ approximating domain lithology. This pass does not use the block search anisotropy and uses the variogram search for background schist/minor skarn (bearing 182.2, plunge -18.9, dip -16.7).
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-29 |
|---|

Silver estimates were completed for the South and North skarn domains similar to gold estimates with equal major and semi-major search radius between 320 ft and 350 ft informed by the silver composite variography (Table 11‑13). The block search anisotropy (LVA) was used for all estimates except overburden (Table 11‑15). Domain 203 was able to see domain 212 composites as part of the soft boundary search whereas all other soft boundary conditions were treated similar to gold (Table 11‑16). A plan view and cross section of silver estimate searches and estimate are shown in Figure 11‑16.
For arsenic, calcium (percent), copper, and sulfur (percent) estimates, major axis searches vary from 300 ft to 570 ft.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-30 |
|---|

FIGURE
11‑14 GOLD
ESTIMATE
SEARCH ELLIPSE
IN PLAN VIEW
\(TOP\) AND
NW-LOOKING
CROSS SECTION
\(BELOW\)

FIGURE
11‑15 GOLD
HIGH GRADE
RESTRICTION
SEARCH SHOWN
IN GREEN
VERSUS DOMAIN
201 SEARCH
ELLIPSE IN
BLUE

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-31 |
|---|

FIGURE
11‑16 SILVER
ESTIMATE
SEARCH ELLIPSE
IN PLAN VIEW
\(TOP\) AND
NW-LOOKING
CROSS SECTION
\(BELOW\)

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-32 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑14 GOLD GRADE ID^3^ ESTIMATE PARAMETERS
| Area | Est<br> Domain | EstID | Comp<br> Selection<br><br> (soft<br> boundary) | Soft<br> Bound | HG<br> Restrict Au<br> g/t | LVA | Min<br> Comp | Max<br> Comp | Max/<br> Hole | Major<br> (ft) | Semi<br><br> <br>(ft) | Minor<br> (ft) | Block<br> Domain<br> Selection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South | 201 | i201 | ORE=201,(203) | Y | 50 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 220 | 160 | 70 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 201) |
| South | 202 | i202 | ORE=202,(203,204) | Y | 15 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 500 | 300 | 60 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 202) |
| South | 203 | i203 | ORE=203,(202,204) | Y | 15 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 500 | 300 | 60 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 203) |
| South | 204 | i204 | ORE=204,(202,203,205,206) | Y | 15 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 370 | 300 | 70 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 204) |
| South | 205<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> & 206 | i205 | ORE=205,206,(203,204) | Y | 50 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 370 | 300 | 70 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 205 or<br> domain eq 206) |
| South | 207,<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 208, 209, 210 | i207 | ORE=207,208,209,210 | 15 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 170 | 240 | 70 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 207 ,208 ,<br> 209, 210) | |
| South | 211 | i211 | ORE=211 | 15 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 300 | 350 | 130 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 211) | |
| South | 212 | i212 | ORE=212<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ,<br> (201,203,205) | Y | 15 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 400 | 400 | 100 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 212) |
| South | QMS<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> schist | imsch | ORE=1,(4) | Y | 8 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 300 | 400 | 180 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 1 and pit<br> eq 2) |
| South | Minor<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> skarn | imskn | ORE=1,4 | 8 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 300 | 400 | 180 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 4 and pit<br> eq 2) | |
| North | 101 | in101 | ORE=101,111,112 | 15 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 330 | 200 | 80 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 101, 111, <br> 112) | |
| North | 102<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> & 103 | in102 | ORE=102,103,(104) | Y | 25 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 330 | 200 | 80 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 102 or<br> domain eq 103) |
| North | 104 | in104 | ORE=104,<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> (102,103) | Y | 25 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 330 | 200 | 80 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 104) |
| North | 105 | in105 | ORE=105,(106) | Y | 25 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 330 | 200 | 80 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 105) |
| North | 106 | in106 | ORE=106,(102,104,105,107) | Y | 25 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 250 | 200 | 70 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 106) |
| North | 107 | in107 | ORE=107 | 25 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 330 | 200 | 80 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 107) | |
| North | 108 | in108 | ORE=108,(109) | Y | 50 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 250 | 200 | 70 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 108) |
| North | 109 | in109 | ORE=(108),109 | Y | 50 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 250 | 200 | 70 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 109) |
| North | QMS<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> schist | insch | ORE=1,(4) | Y | 8 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 280 | 310 | 140 | ((domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 1 or 11)<br> and pit eq 1) |
| North | Minor<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> skarn | inskn | ORE=1,4 | 8 | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 280 | 310 | 140 | ((domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 4 or 14)<br> and pit eq 1) | |
| All | Overburden | ovb | ORE=(1,4),9 | Y | 8 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 90 | 90 | 10 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 9) | |
| All | Cleanup | Clean | GEOCD2<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> = 1,4, (5) | Y | 8 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 300 | 400 | 180 | domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ne 9 and auid3<br> lt 0 |
Overburden
estimate uses
305, 0, 0
search
orientation.
Cleanup
estimate uses
182.2, -18.9,
-16.7 search
orientation
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-33 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑15 SILVER GRADE ID^3^ ESTIMATE PARAMETERS
| Area | Est<br> Domain | EstID | Comp<br> Selection<br><br> (soft<br> boundary) | Soft<br><br> <br>Bound | HG<br> Restrict Ag<br> g/t | LVA | Min Comp | Max Comp | Max/<br> Hole | Major<br> (ft) | Semi<br><br> <br>(ft) | Minor<br> (ft) | Block<br> Domain<br> Selection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South | 201 | i201 | ORE=201,(203) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 300 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 201) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| South | 202 | i202 | ORE=202,(203,204) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 300 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 202) |
| South | 203 | i203 | ORE=203,(202,204,212) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 300 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 203) |
| South | 204 | i204 | ORE=204,(202,203,205,206) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 110 | (domain<br> eq 204) |
| South | 205<br> & 206 | i205 | ORE=205,206,(203,204) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 110 | (domain<br> eq 205 or<br> domain eq 206) |
| South | 207,<br> 208, 209, 210 | i207 | ORE=207,208,209,210 | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 300 | 160 | (domain<br> eq 207 ,208 ,<br> 209, 210) | |
| South | 211 | i211 | ORE=211 | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 300 | 160 | (domain<br> eq 211) | |
| South | 212 | i212 | ORE=212<br> ,<br> (201,203,205) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 300 | 160 | (domain<br> eq 212) |
| All | QMS<br> schist | imsch | ORE=1,(4) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 320 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 1 and pit<br> eq 2) |
| All | Minor<br> skarn | imskn | ORE=1,4 | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 320 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 4 and pit<br> eq 2) | |
| North | 101 | in101 | ORE=101,111,112 | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 101, 111, <br> 112) | |
| North | 102<br> & 103 | in102 | ORE=102,103,(104) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 102 or<br> domain eq 103) |
| North | 104 | in104 | ORE=104,<br> (102,103) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 104) |
| North | 105 | in105 | ORE=105,(106) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 105) |
| North | 106 | in106 | ORE=106,(102,104,105,107) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 106) |
| North | 107 | in107 | ORE=107 | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 107) | |
| North | 108 | in108 | ORE=108,(109) | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 108) |
| North | 109 | in109 | ORE=(108),109 | Y | N/A | Y | 3 | 10 | 2 | 350 | 350 | 150 | (domain<br> eq 109) |
| All | Overburden | ovb | ORE=(1,4),9 | Y | N/A | 2 | 8 | 2 | 90 | 90 | 10 | (domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> eq 9) | |
| All | Cleanup | Clean | GEOCD2<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> = 1,4, (5) | Y | N/A | Y | 2 | 10 | 2 | 320 | 320 | 150 | domain<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ne 9 and agid<br> lt 0 |
Overburden
Ag estimate
uses 305, 0, 0
search
orientation.
Cleanup
estimate uses
LVA.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-34 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑16 SOFT BOUNDARY COMPOSITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR GOLD AND SILVER ESTIMATE
| Deposit | Est<br> Domain | EstID | Comp<br> Selection<br><br> <br>(soft<br> boundary) | Soft<br> Boundary Comp<br> Selection | Soft<br><br> <br>Bound<br><br> Major Axis<br> Radius (ft) | Soft<br><br> <br>Bound<br><br> <br>Semi<br> Axis Radius<br> (ft) | Soft<br> Bound Minor<br> Axis Radius<br> (ft) | Soft<br><br> <br>Bound<br> Bearing | Soft<br><br> <br>Bound<br> Plunge | Soft<br> Bound<br><br> <br>Dip |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South | 201 | i201 | ORE=201,(203) | [203] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| South | 202 | i202 | ORE=202,(203,204) | [203,204] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| South | 203* | i203 | ORE=203,(202,204)* | [202,204] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| South | 204 | i204 | ORE=204,(202,203,205,206) | [202,203,205,206] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| South | 205<br> & 206 | i205 | ORE=205,206,<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> (203,204) | [203,204] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| South | 207,<br> 208, 209, 210 | i207 | ORE=207,208,209,210 | |||||||
| South | 211 | i211 | ORE=211 | |||||||
| South | 212 | i212 | ORE=212<br> ,<br> (201,203,205) | [201,205,203] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| South | QMS<br> schist | imsch | ORE=1,(4) | [4] | 45 | 45 | 45 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| South | Minor<br> skarn | imskn | ORE=1,4 | |||||||
| North | 101 | in101 | ORE=101,111,112 | |||||||
| North | 102<br> & 103 | in102 | ORE=102,103,(104) | [104] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 20 |
| North | 1004 | in104 | ORE=104,<br> (102,103) | [102,103] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 20 |
| North | 105 | in105 | ORE=105,(106) | [106] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 20 |
| North | 106 | in106 | ORE=106,(102,104,105,107) | [102,104,105,107] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 20 |
| North | 107 | in107 | ORE=107 | |||||||
| North | 108 | in108 | ORE=108,(109) | [109] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 20 |
| North | 109 | in109 | ORE=(108),109 | [108] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 20 |
| North | QMS<br> schist | insch | ORE=1,(4) | [4] | 45 | 45 | 45 | 305 | 0 | 10 |
| North | Minor<br> skarn | inskn | ORE=1,4 | |||||||
| All | Overburden | ovb | ORE=(1,4),9 | [1,4] | 20 | 20 | 20 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| All | Cleanup | clean | GEOCD2 =<br> 1,4, (5) | [5<br> (skarn)] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
| All | Cleanup | clean | GEOCD2 =<br> 1,4, (5) | [5<br> (skarn)] | 45 | 45 | 15 | 305 | 0 | 0 |
*domain
203 estimate
for silver
includes soft
boundary
composites
from ORE
domain 21
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-35 |
|---|

11.5.5. DENSITY INTERPOLATION
An ID^3^ estimate was completed for density based on individual non-composited density point sample measurements from downhole data. The estimate was run with soft 90 ft isotropic search boundaries between redox domains within skarn domains and all outside domains including minor skarn. Transition and sulfide redox domains were estimated together. This resulted in four estimations:
| • | Oxide<br> background –<br> redox codes<br> 3,4 and domain<br> codes 0<br> through 20,<br> soft bound to<br> redox = 3 |
|---|---|
| • | Oxide<br> skarn – redox<br> codes 3, 4 and<br> domain codes<br> greater than<br> 20, soft bound<br> to redox = 3 |
| --- | --- |
| • | Transition/sulfide<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> background –<br> redox codes<br> 1,3,4 and<br> domain codes 0<br> through 20,<br> soft bound to<br> redox = 4 |
| --- | --- |
| • | Transition/sulfide<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> skarn – redox<br> codes 1,3,4<br> and domain<br> codes greater<br> than 20, soft<br> bound to redox<br> = 4 |
| --- | --- |
The estimate was based on the following criteria:
| • | Sample<br> Count = 2 |
|---|---|
| • | Maximum<br> Samples = 6 |
| --- | --- |
| • | Maximum<br> Samples per<br> Drill Hole = 2 |
| --- | --- |
A 600 ft x 600 ft x 200 ft ellipsoidal search was used with global mean NW trending schist fabric orientation of 305°, 0° plunge, and 10° dip used for the estimates.
NN, ID^2^, and variable minimum and maximum sample counts were iteratively tested to determine an estimate that honored local density data variability appropriately. ID^2^ and higher counts are over-smoothed versus sample data. Estimates without respecting the skarn domains extended local higher density sample values beyond reasonable geologic interpretation of the skarn extents. A comparison of domain approach, NN, and ID^3^ estimates for density are shown in Figure 11‑17. Imperial unit density is expressed in the DENS variable as inverse tonnage factor (TF) using ton/ft^3^ and in the TF variable as tonnage factor using ft^3^/st.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-36 |
|---|

Figure
11‑17 Cross
Section
Comparison of
Domain
Approach, NN,
and ID^3^
Estimates for
Manh Choh

11.6. MODEL VALIDATION
Estimation
sensitivities
were run at
various
capping levels
as a check of
the
appropriateness
of loss in
total metal
content for
gold and
silver at
incrementally
lower and
higher capping
levels. An
uncapped gold
estimate
within the
reserve design
produces 7%
more total
gold metal
globally. The
estimated
metal loss
varies for
each domain
estimate. A
global
comparison
within the
reserve design
of the
un-declustered
composite mean
gold grade to
estimate
methods is
presented in
Table 11‑17.
Visual checks
of the
estimated
block grades
and
corresponding
composites
were completed
for all metals
and elements
estimated.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-37 |
|---|

Swath plots were generated for the gold and silver estimates completed for the Manh Choh deposits relative to the block model rotated X-, Y-, and Z-axes. Gold swath plots are shown in Figure 11‑18 to Figure 11‑20. Silver swath plots are shown in Figure 11‑21 to Figure 11‑23. For both gold and silver estimates, the swath plots suggest that all estimates are smooth relative to the declustered composite mean grade data. The ID^3^ estimate produces a reasonable estimate between the OK and NN estimates.
Figure
11‑24 shows
the global
grade-tonnage
profile of the
Manh Choh
deposits for
gold estimates
within
Indicated
Mineral
Resource
classification
below
topography but
unconstrained
by a resource
solid or
design. The
model shows an
under-estimated
grade profile
versus 10 ft
\(3.1 m\)
composite NN
estimate for
the ID^3^
final gold
estimator.
TABLE 11‑17 GLOBAL COMPARISON OF UNCAPPED, CAPPED AND DECLUSTERED 10 FT COMPOSITES TO ID^3^ AND NN ESTIMATES
| Uncapped<br><br> <br>AU_PPM<br><br> <br>Composite<br><br> <br>Mean<br> (g/t) | AUCAP<br><br> <br>Composite<br><br> <br>Mean<br> (g/t) | Declustered<br><br> <br>AUCAP<br><br> <br>Composite<br><br> <br>Mean<br> (g/t) | AUID3<br><br> <br>(g/t) | AUNN<br><br> <br>(g/t) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inside<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Design, inside<br> skarn domains<br> >0 | 5.36 | 4.96 | 1.89 | 1.465 | 1.473 |
FIGURE
11‑18 SWATH
PLOT GOLD 045
AZIMUTH \(X
AXIS\)

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-38 |
|---|

FIGURE
11‑19 SWATH
PLOT GOLD 315
AZIMUTH \(Y
AXIS\)

FIGURE
11‑20 SWATH
PLOT GOLD \(Z
AXIS\)

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-39 |
|---|

FIGURE
11‑21 SWATH
PLOT SILVER
045 AZIMUTH
\(X-AXIS\)

FIGURE
11‑22 SWATH
PLOT SILVER
315 AZIMUTH \(Y
AXIS\)

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-40 |
|---|

FIGURE
11‑23 SWATH
PLOT SILVER \(Z
AXIS\)

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-41 |
|---|

FIGURE
11‑24 GRADE
TONNAGE CURVE
COMPARISON OF
ID3 \(RED\) TO
OK \(BLUE\) AND
NN \(YELLOW\).

11.7. RESOURCE
CLASSIFICATION
Definitions
for resource
categories
used in this
TRS are those
defined by SEC
in S-K 1300.
Mineral
Resources are
classified
into Measured,
Indicated, and
Inferred
categories.
Blocks
were coded as
Indicated or
Inferred based
on the ID^3^
gold grade
estimate, the
minimum
distance to
the nearest
composite, and
drill hole
spacing. Plan
sections of
the model were
sliced to
correlate
minimum
composite
distances
within the
estimate and
drill hole
spacing.
Polygonal
outlines of
cohesive drill
clusters were
generated to
eliminate
isolated drill
holes. The
outlines were
used to
generate a
solid
wireframe to
black flag the
model. The
Indicated
class solid
encloses drill
holes within
65.6 ft \(20 m\)
drill
spacing. The
Inferred class
solid encloses
effective
drill spacing
of 131.2 ft
\(40 m\).
MCS and MCN classification:
| • | Measured:<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Not classified |
|---|---|
| • | Indicated:<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Average<br> Distance <<br> 65.6 ft |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-42 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Inferred:<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Average<br> Distance <<br> 131.2 ft |
|---|---|
| • | Unclassified:<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Remaining<br> estimated<br> blocks |
| --- | --- |
Figure
11‑25 presents
a plan view
sliced section
of the South
and North
areas showing
block model
classification
relative to
drill hole
traces.
FIGURE
11‑25 PLAN
VIEW OF MAHN
CHOH NORTH AND
SOUTH DEPOSITS
BLOCK
MODEL
CLASSIFICATION
\(2021 DRILL
COLLARS IN
BLUE\)

The QP has reviewed the resource block model and classification and is of the opinion that they adequately support the reporting of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves.
11.8. MINERAL RESOURCE REPORTING
Mineral
Resources
summarized in
this section
follow the
definitions
for Mineral
Resources in
S-K 1300. The
following
paragraphs are
quoted from
those
documents. “A
Mineral
Resource is a
concentration
or occurrence
of diamonds,
natural solid
inorganic
material, or
natural solid
fossilized
organic
material
including base
and precious
metals, coal,
and industrial
minerals in or
on the Earth’s
crust in such
form and
quantity and
of such a
grade or
quality that
it has
reasonable
prospects for
economic
extraction.
The location,
quantity,
grade,
geologic
characteristics
and continuity
of a Mineral
Resource are
known,
estimated or
interpreted
from specific
geological
evidence and
knowledge.”
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-43 |
|---|

“The phrase ‘reasonable prospects for economic extraction’ implies a judgment by the Qualified Person in respect to the technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction. A Mineral Resource is an inventory of mineralization that under realistically assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions might become economically extractable. These assumptions must be presented explicitly in both public and technical reports.” “The reader is cautioned that mineral resources are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be realized or that they will convert to mineral reserves.”
Contango’s
December 31,
2022 Mineral
Resource
statement
comprises
Indicated and
Inferred
Mineral
Resources for
the MCN and
MCS deposits.
Mineral
Resources are
reported
within a
Lerchs
Grossmann
optimization
shell,
exclusive of
Mineral
Reserves,
using prices
of $1,600/oz
for gold and
$22/oz for
silver and a
Process Cash
Flow \(PCF\)
cut-off
criteria
defining model
blocks which
produce PCF
greater than
or equal to
zero after
allowance for
dilution,
recovery,
mining, and
process costs.
Mineral
Resources are
reported using
un-diluted
gold and
silver grades
for both MCS
and MCN and
are exclusive
of Mineral
Reserves.
Mineral
Resources are
reported below
the Project
topographic
surface with
no depletion
as no mining
has been
conducted on
the deposits.
Table 11‑18 and Table 11‑19 summarize Manh Choh Mineral Resources, exclusive of Mineral Reserves, for Peak Gold’s 100% attributable ownership basis and Contango’s 30% ownership basis, respectively.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-44 |
|---|

TABLE 11‑18 SUMMARY OF MINERAL RESOURCES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – PEAK GOLD, LLC’S 100% OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au<br> Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag<br> Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manh<br> Choh South | |||||
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 574.3 | 2.5 | 45.7 | 7.0 | 129.4 |
| TOTAL | 574.3 | 2.5 | 45.7 | 7.0 | 129.4 |
| Inferred | 4.3 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 2.8 | 0.3 |
| Manh<br> Choh North | |||||
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 271.4 | 2.2 | 19.4 | 14.0 | 122.7 |
| TOTAL | 271.4 | 2.2 | 19.4 | 14.0 | 122.7 |
| Inferred | 17.1 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 10.6 | 6.0 |
| Total<br> Mineral<br> Resource, Manh<br> Choh South and<br> North | |||||
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 845.7 | 2.4 | 65.3 | 9.3 | 252.1 |
| TOTAL | 845.7 | 2.4 | 65.3 | 9.3 | 252.1 |
| Inferred | 21.4 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 9.20 | 6.3 |
TABLE 11‑19 SUMMARY OF MINERAL RESOURCES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – CONTANGO’S 30% ATTRIBUTABLE OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au<br> Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag<br> Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manh<br> Choh South | |||||
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 172.3 | 2.5 | 13.7 | 7.0 | 38.8 |
| TOTAL | 172.3 | 2.5 | 13.7 | 7.0 | 38.8 |
| Inferred | 1.3 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 0.1 |
| Manh<br> Choh North | |||||
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 81.4 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 14.0 | 36.8 |
| TOTAL | 81.4 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 14.0 | 36.8 |
| Inferred | 5.1 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 10.6 | 1.8 |
| Total<br> Mineral<br> Resource, Manh<br> Choh South and<br> North | |||||
| Measured | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indicated | 253.7 | 2.4 | 19.6 | 9.3 | 75.6 |
| TOTAL | 253.7 | 2.4 | 19.6 | 9.3 | 75.6 |
| Inferred | 6.4 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 9.20 | 1.9 |
Notes for Tables 11-18 and 11-19:
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-45 |
|---|

| 1. | The<br> definitions<br> for Mineral<br> Resources in<br> S-K 1300 were<br> followed for<br> Mineral<br> Resources. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported exclusive<br> of Mineral<br> Reserves. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> estimated<br> using long<br> term prices of<br> US$1,600/oz Au<br> price and<br> US$22/oz. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported using<br> un-diluted Au<br> and Ag grades. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported<br> within<br> constraining<br> pit shells. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Mineral<br> Resources that<br> are not<br> Mineral<br> Reserves do<br> not have<br> demonstrated<br> economic<br> viability. |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported in<br> dry metric<br> tonnes. |
| --- | --- |
| 8. | Numbers<br> may not add<br> due to<br> rounding. |
| --- | --- |
| 9. | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> tabulated<br> using Process<br> Cash Flow<br> (PCF) cut-off<br> criteria to<br> define model<br> blocks which<br> produce PCF<br> greater than<br> or equal to<br> zero value<br> after<br> subtraction of<br> dilution,<br> process, and<br> other costs. |
| --- | --- |
| 11.9. | QUALIFIED<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> PERSON’S<br> OPINION AND<br> RECOMMENDATIONS |
| --- | --- |
The QP has reviewed the inputs for the reporting of Mineral Resources and is of the opinion that they are reasonable. The QP recommends that these inputs be reviewed during any future studies.
The QP is of the opinion that with consideration of the recommendations summarized below and in Sections 1 and 23 of this report, any issues relating to all relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction can be resolved with further work.
The estimates of Mineral Resources may be materially affected if mining, metallurgical, or infrastructure factors change from those currently anticipated at the Manh Choh Project. Although the QP has a reasonable expectation that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Resources with continued exploration, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources have significant geological uncertainty and it should not be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be converted to the Measured or Indicated categories.
The QP offers the following recommendations:
| 1. | Carry<br> out a<br> comparison of<br> the grade<br> capping on the<br> 10 ft<br> composites and<br> the variable<br> raw assays. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Use<br> Disintegration<br> Analysis for<br> grade capping. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | To<br> avoid<br> over-estimation<br> of grades in<br> certain areas,<br> review and<br> confirm<br> declustered<br> mean values. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Test<br> the variable<br> orientation<br> and estimation<br> in Leapfrog<br> rather than<br> moving the<br> work to Vulcan<br> software. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Tabulate<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and review<br> capped vs.<br> uncapped gold<br> volumetric<br> output (grade<br> and ounces)<br> from the block<br> model by<br> domain. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 11-46 |
| --- | --- |

| 12. | MINERAL<br> RESERVE<br> ESTIMATES |
|---|---|
| 12.1. | SUMMARY |
| --- | --- |
Table 12‑1 summarizes the Manh Choh Mineral Reserve estimate for the Project, effective December 31, 2022 (100% Peak Gold JV attributable ownership basis). Table 12-2 summarizes Contango’s 30% attributable ownership of the Mineral Reserve estimate.
TABLE 12‑1 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – PEAK GOLD 100% ATTRIBUTABLE OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au<br> Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag<br> Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proven | - | - | - | - | - |
| Probable | 3,936 | 7.9 | 997 | 13.6 | 1,719 |
| TOTAL | 3,936 | 7.9 | 997 | 13.6 | 1,719 |
TABLE 12‑2 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 – CONTANGO 30% ATTRIBUTABLE OWNERSHIP
| Classification | Tonnes<br><br> <br>(000) | Au<br> Grade<br><br> (g/t) | Au<br> Ounces<br><br> <br>(000) | Ag<br> Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t) | Ag<br> Ounces<br><br> (000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proven | - | - | - | - | - |
| Probable | 1,181 | 7.9 | 299 | 13.6 | 516 |
| TOTAL | 1,181 | 7.9 | 299 | 13.6 | 516 |
Notes for Tables 12-1 and 12-2:
| 1. | The<br> definitions<br> for Mineral<br> Resources in<br> S-K 1300 were<br> followed for<br> Mineral<br> Resources. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Mineral<br> Reserves were<br> estimated at<br> long term<br> prices of<br> $1,300/oz Au<br> and $17/oz Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Mineral<br> Reserves are<br> reported at an<br> economic<br> cut-off that<br> varies by<br> process cost<br> and<br> metallurgical<br> recovery,<br> approximately<br> equivalent to<br> 2.50 g/t Au. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Mineral<br> Reserve<br> estimates<br> incorporate<br> dilution built<br> in during the<br> re-blocking<br> process and<br> assume 100%<br> mining<br> recovery. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Mineral<br> Reserves are<br> reported in<br> dry metric<br> tonnes. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Numbers<br> may not add<br> due to<br> rounding. |
| --- | --- |
The QP is not aware of any risk factors associated with, or changes to, any aspects of the modifying factors such as mining, metallurgical, infrastructure,
permitting, or
other relevant
factors that
could
materially
affect the
Mineral
Reserve
estimate.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 12-1 |
|---|

| 12.2. | DILUTION<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> AND ORE LOSS |
|---|
The Project involves mining two small, high-grade open pits. Due to the high grade and high process cost regime of the Project, maintaining selectivity and mitigating external dilution and ore loss during the mining process are key value drivers. The smallest mining unit (SMU), thus emulated by the regularized resource model block size, is deemed to be 20 ft x 20 ft x 10 ft (height). The primary ore loading fleet will therefore be tailored to maintain selectivity at this scale, with excavator buckets not to exceed 7 ft to 8 ft widths, and flitch mining in 10 ft flitches (20 ft blasts) to occur in ore zones.
As mining dilution and ore loss are of particular importance, several analytical methods were employed to quantify the associated risk and develop a recommended approach to applying dilution to the Mineral Reserve estimate. This includes block skin dilution from adjacent blocks in all three directions, identifying ore blocks isolated by four or more waste contacts, and employing Maptek Pty Limited’s Vulcan Grade Control Optimization (GCO) module to simulate short-range grade control practices. The recommended approach to dilution is to apply block skin dilution in the vertical direction only.
To simulate dilution along the floor of each 10 ft flitch, a 2 ft thick block skin was introduced along every other ore contact. Adjacent block grades in the planning model inform the grade of the 2 ft thick block skin. No external waste dilution or ore loss factors were applied to the Mineral Reserve estimate.
The Project will require a rigorous grade control program to mitigate mining dilution and ore loss.
| • | To<br> inform the<br> short-range<br> planning<br> model, at<br> least 60% of<br> blastholes in<br> ore blasts<br> will be<br> sampled on 2<br> ft x10 ft<br> intervals. <br> Blasthole<br> samples will<br> be shipped to<br> the assay lab<br> at Fort Knox<br> for assays of<br> Au, Ag, S, Cu,<br> As, and Ca to<br> facilitate<br> block cash<br> flow and waste<br> classification<br> calculations. |
|---|---|
| • | To<br> inform waste<br> rock<br> characterization,<br> the short-term<br> planning<br> model, and<br> haulage<br> destinations,<br> the blasthole<br> sampling<br> program will<br> include<br> sampling 25%<br> of blastholes<br> in waste<br> blasts for<br> LECO analysis. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Ore<br> excavators<br> will be<br> equipped with<br> high-precision<br> GPS and field<br> flagging of<br> ore/waste<br> contacts will<br> be completed<br> by dedicated<br> ore control<br> geologists. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Orica<br> Limited’s<br> OrePro 3D<br> software or<br> similar blast<br> movement<br> monitoring<br> programs will<br> be used to<br> model the<br> movement of<br> ore-waste<br> contacts<br> delineated in<br> the<br> short-range<br> planning model<br> and depict the<br> vertical swell<br> of each blast<br> to guide the<br> ore excavators<br> along the<br> correct flitch<br> elevations. |
| --- | --- |
| 12.3. | CUT-OFF<br> GRADE |
| --- | --- |
Ore and waste determination is based on a net block cash flow method calculated within the planning model. The calculation is based on:
| • | Mineral<br> Reserve prices<br> of $1,300/oz<br> Au and $17/oz<br> Ag. |
|---|---|
| • | Per<br> ounce charges<br> for smelting<br> and refining. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Tetlin<br> and Royal Gold<br> royalties. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Unit<br> operating<br> costs. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Metallurgical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> recoveries for<br> Au and Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 12-2 |
| --- | --- |

Where the net block cash flow exceeds zero in the planning model, and the block has either a Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource classification in the resource model, the block is considered part of the Mineral Reserve.
Table 12‑3 summarizes the cut-off grade calculation inputs for Mineral Reserves.
TABLE 12‑3 MINERAL RESERVE CUT-OFF GRADE INPUTS
| Item | Unit | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gold<br> Price | $/oz | 1,300 | |
| Silver<br> Price | $/oz | 17.00 | |
| Gold<br> Charges | $/oz | 5.67 | Per oz<br> recovered |
| Silver<br> Charges | $/oz | 1.17 | Per oz<br> recovered |
| Tetlin<br> Royalty | % | 3 | NSR –<br> Au and Ag |
| Royal<br> Gold Royalty | % | 3 | NSR –<br> Au and Ag |
| Royal<br> Gold Royalty | % | 28 | NSR –<br> Ag only |
| Processing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> – Base | $/ton<br> proc. | 8.70 | Fort<br> Knox (FK) base<br> processing<br> cost,<br> including<br> crushing |
| Processing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> – Reagents<br> (Variable) | $/ton<br> proc. | ~7.57 | Actual<br> based on<br> consumption<br> formulae |
| Processing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> – Reagents<br> (Fixed) | $/ton<br> proc. | 0.11 | |
| Rehandle | $/ton<br> proc. | 1.92 | FK<br> rehandle into<br> crusher |
| Sub-total<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> – FK<br> Processing | $/ton<br> proc. | ~18.30 | |
| Ore<br> Transport | $/ton<br> proc. | 67.00 | Includes<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> access road<br> haulage |
| Sub-total<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> – MC<br> Processing | $/ton<br> proc. | 67.00 | |
| Total<br> Processing | $/ton<br> proc. | ~85.30 | |
| Metallurgical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Recovery (Au) | % | ~90.0 | Actual<br> based on<br> recovery<br> formula |
| Metallurgical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Recovery (Ag) | % | ~67.7 | Actual<br> based on<br> recovery<br> formula |
| Mineral<br> Reserve<br><br> <br>(Processing)<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Cut-off Grade | g/t Au | ~2.50^1,2,3^ | Proxy/estimate<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> – actual is<br> based on net<br><br> <br>block<br> cash flow |
Notes:
| 1. | KGMA<br> prepared<br> cut-off grades<br> for Peak Gold<br> JV. <br> Calculations<br> exclude<br> incremental<br> Fort Knox<br> G&A costs. |
|---|---|
| 2. | KGMA<br> prepared<br> cut-off grades<br> for Peak Gold<br> JV. <br> Calculations<br> exclude Manh<br> Choh G&A<br> costs. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | KGMA<br> prepared<br> cut-off grades<br> for Peak Gold<br> JV. <br> Calculations<br> exclude Toll<br> Milling<br> Profit. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 12-3 |
| --- | --- |

Considering
the chosen
highway
transport rate
\(3,000 stpd
ore\) is the
downstream
bottleneck,
ore stockpiles
must be
maintained to
disconnect the
ex-pit ore
mining rate
and ore
delivery rate,
as there are
periods in the
LOM plan with
more or less
than the
requisite
3,000 stpd.
Maintaining a
consistent
delivery rate
is important
to allow the
transport
contractor to
maintain
steady-state
operations and
for the
Project not to
incur standby
charges due to
lack of ore
available to
transport.
The ore stockpiles enable the Project to employ an elevated cut-off grade strategy. In every planning period, the LOM plan selects from available ex-pit sources or from the highest-grade stockpile to maximize the in-period cash flow of the ore delivered to Fort Knox.
The estimates of Mineral Reserves may be materially affected if mining, metallurgical, or infrastructure factors change from those currently anticipated at the Manh Choh Project.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 12-4 |
|---|

| 13. | MINING<br> METHODS |
|---|---|
| 13.1. | MINE<br> DESIGN<br> CONSIDERATIONS |
| --- | --- |
\
| 13.1.1. | RESOURCE<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> AND PLANNING<br> MODELS |
|---|
The primary economic drivers of the LOM plan are estimates of gold (ID^3^) and silver (ID^2^) in the 2021 resource model. The model’s estimate of density (ID^3^) was used to calculate block tonnages. A planning model was developed to overlay the resource model with calculations of net block revenue to capture variable downstream costs and recovery and to prioritize higher-revenue blocks early in the LOM plan by way of a stockpiling strategy. This is of particular importance to Project economics as the on-highway delivery rate to Fort Knox (3,000 stpd) is the limiting bottleneck. Estimation domains 109 (MCN) and 205 (MCS) are significant drivers of Project value as both are primary sources of high-grade ore early in the mine life.
Two alteration models have been developed to inform the planning model:
| 1. | An<br> alteration<br> model<br> including<br> sulfides,<br> transitional<br> material, and<br> oxides, which<br> is based on<br> wireframes<br> developed from<br> core logging<br> and used for<br> geotechnical<br> design,<br> blasting<br> design, and<br> waste<br> characterization.<br> Overburden is<br> also flagged<br> in the<br> planning model<br> based on these<br> wireframes. |
|---|---|
| 2. | An<br> alteration<br> model<br> including only<br> sulfides and<br> oxides, which<br> is based on<br> sulfur grade<br> criteria and<br> used to<br> determine<br> downstream<br> reagent<br> dosages and<br> processing<br> costs. |
| --- | --- |
In the planning model, estimates of copper (ID^2^) and sulfur (ID^2^) are drivers of both recovery and downstream processing costs. Estimates of calcium (ID^2^) in addition to sulfur are used to calculate acid potential (AP), neutralization potential (NP), and neutralization potential ratio (NPR), which results in the classification of some waste as potentially acid generating (PAG). An estimate of arsenic (ID^2^) is used to calculate potential for metal leaching which results in the classification of some waste as non-acid generating but potentially metal leaching (ML or NAG-ML).
The resource model carries estimates of RQD (ID^2^),
however, this
parameter is
not a key
driver of the
LOM plan. If
warranted,
rock mass
hardness,
swell factor,
and diggabilty
parameters
will be
investigated
during the
Project’s
operating
phase.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-1 |
|---|

| 13.1.2. | GEOTECHNICAL<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> CONSIDERATIONS |
|---|
In 2018, SRK completed a geotechnical report to support the PEA of the Project (Gopinathan et al., 2018). The reference dataset consisted of oriented core logging and RQD data obtained from previous exploration drilling performed by the prior site owners. SRK also developed a desktop-level structural model and pit design criteria.
SRK’s 2018 work and geotechnical report have since been superseded by a study completed by Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd. (Piteau) in September 2021. The Piteau report is based on data collected from an 11-hole, 5,280 ft geotechnical drilling program completed in 2021, including oriented core logging, detailed logging of structures, and downhole televiewer surveys. A suite of laboratory testing was performed on samples gathered from the 2021 program, including various strength tests and triaxial testing on samples of fault gouge. The Piteau report details 2D limit equilibrium stability analyses on 11 sections through interim pit designs for MCN and MCS, combining the orientation of modeled structures and intact rock strength parameters.
Piteau’s
2021 report
asserts that
the pit slope
design
criteria used
to develop the
FS pit slope
designs are in
fact at a
Pre-Feasibility
Study \(PFS\)
level of
study/confidence.
Piteau has not
performed
stability
analyses on
the final FS
pit slope
designs.
2021 PITEAU ASSESSMENT
Piteau’s
geotechnical
appraisal is
summarized as
follows:
| • | Rock<br> Mass<br> Description:<br> Bedrock at the<br> Project area<br> is comprised<br> primarily of<br> QMS and is<br> covered by a<br> very thin<br> layer of<br> overburden,<br> followed by<br> three<br> principal<br> geotechnical<br> units based on<br> the deposit<br> alteration<br> model: oxides,<br> transitional<br> material, and<br> sulfides<br> (Figure 13‑1<br> and Table<br> 13‑1). |
|---|---|
| o | Oxides<br> comprise the<br> upper 5 ft to<br> 260 ft of the<br> deposit and<br> are most<br> prevalent at<br> MCN, which is<br> weathered to a<br> greater depth<br> extent than<br> MCS. Oxides<br> have the<br> lowest Rock<br> Mass Rating<br> (RMR) of the<br> three<br> geotechnical<br> units. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Transitional<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> material<br> occurs beneath<br> the oxides and<br> varies in<br> thickness from<br> 90 ft to 270<br> ft. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Sulfides<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> occur below<br> the<br> transitional<br> material and<br> are most<br> prevalent at<br> MCS. Sulfides<br> demonstrate<br> the highest<br> RMR values of<br> the three<br> geotechnical<br> units, being<br> the least<br> weathered and<br> altered. As<br> such, during<br> mining, rock<br> mass<br> conditions are<br> expected to be<br> more<br> challenging in<br> MCN as<br> compared to<br> MCS and<br> generally<br> improve with<br> depth. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Structural<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and Fault<br> Models: The<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Project area<br> displays two<br> dominant<br> structural<br> orientations<br> expressed by<br> high-angle,<br> brittle<br> faulting:<br> northwest-southeast<br> and<br> northeast-southwest.<br> This is<br> consistent<br> with the<br> dominant<br> regional<br> stress regime<br> in Eastern<br> Interior<br> Alaska.<br> Faulting at<br> the deposit is<br> attributed to<br> three major<br> deformation<br> events, D1-3.<br> Generally, D1<br> and D2<br> faults are<br> northwest-southeast<br> striking with<br> steep dip and<br> D3<br> faults<br> cross-cut the<br> deposit<br> trending<br> northeast-southwest,<br> orthogonal to<br> the D1<br> and D2<br> fabric. The<br> structural<br> model<br> developed by<br> KGMA suggests<br> that five D1<br> faults, seven<br> D2<br> faults, and<br> three D3<br> faults<br> potentially<br> interact with<br> MCN or MCS. <br> Of these,<br> Piteau<br> identified<br> three faults<br> as having<br> potentially<br> adverse impact<br> on pit wall<br> stability with<br> stability<br> being<br> sensitive to<br> fault<br> orientation<br> and location<br> relative to<br> the pit walls. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-2 |
| --- | --- |

FIGURE 13‑1 PIT CROSS SECTION SHOWING ALTERATION MODEL

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
TABLE 13‑1 GEOTECHNICAL DOMAINS
| Pit | Domain | Geotechnical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Unit | Pit<br> Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCS | North | Oxide<br><br> <br>Transition<br><br> <br>Sulfide | North<br> Walls |
| Southeast | East<br> and Southeast<br> Walls | ||
| South | South<br> Walls | ||
| West | West<br> Walls | ||
| MCN | Northeast | Oxide<br><br> <br>Transition | North<br> and Northeast<br> Walls |
| Southwest | South<br> and Southwest<br> Walls | ||
| • | Rock<br> Mass Strength:<br> A suite<br> of strength<br> tests were<br> carried out to<br> supplement<br> geotechnical<br> core logging,<br> including<br> unconfined<br> compressive<br> strength (UCS)<br> tests, point<br> load index<br> (PLI) tests,<br> triaxial<br> compressive<br> strength (TCS)<br> tests, and<br> Brazilian<br> tensile<br> strength (BTS)<br> tests. Direct<br> shear testing<br> was also<br> performed to<br> determine the<br> strength of<br> discontinuities,<br> which does not<br> appear to<br> change<br> substantially<br> with lithology<br> or<br> geotechnical<br> domain. For<br> design<br> purposes, RMR<br> values<br> ascribed to<br> each domain<br> are 57, 71,<br> and 80 for<br> oxides,<br> transitional<br> material, and<br> sulfides,<br> respectively. | ||
| --- | --- | ||
| • | Pit<br> Design<br> Criteria: 2D<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> limit<br> equilibrium<br> analyses were<br> performed to<br> model possible<br> kinematic<br> failure modes,<br> combining<br> assessments of<br> rock mass<br> strength and<br> known<br> discontinuities.<br> Design<br> acceptability<br> criteria<br> (Table 13‑2)<br> are based on a<br> minimum static<br> factor of<br> safety (FOS)<br> of 1.2 for<br> inter-ramp<br> slopes and 1.3<br> for overall<br> slopes. Most<br> geotechnical<br> domains are<br> controlled by<br> bench<br> kinematics,<br> resulting in<br> slopes between<br> 43°<br> and 49°. <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Two domains<br> were<br> identified as<br> having<br> particular<br> sensitivity to<br> structural<br> controls and<br> require low<br> slope angles<br> to ensure<br> stability: | ||
| --- | --- | ||
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-3 | ||
| --- | --- |

| o | The<br> North Domain<br> of MCS is<br> controlled by<br> fault and<br> shear<br> anisotropy,<br> requiring low<br> slope angles<br> where the<br> orientation of<br> the walls is<br> within 30°<br> of the strike<br> of faults and<br> foliation. |
|---|---|
| o | Slope<br> stability for<br> the Northeast<br> Domain of MCN<br> is controlled<br> by faults<br> GM-D1_7b and<br> GM-D1_7c where<br> the<br> orientation of<br> the walls is<br> within 30°^^of<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> the faults. |
| --- | --- |
TABLE 13‑2 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN CRITERIA
| Pit | Design<br><br> <br>Sector | Structural<br><br> <br>Domain | Slope<br> Dip<br><br> <br>Dir. (^o^) | Bench<br><br> <br>Height<br> (ft) | Bench<br><br> <br>Width<br> (ft) | Bench<br><br> <br>Face<br><br> <br>Angle (^o^) | Inter-<br><br> <br>ramp<br><br> <br>Angle (^o^) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCS | I | North | 177 to<br> 240 | 60 | 107 | 75 | 26 |
| II | Southeast | 240 to<br> 270 | 60 | 46 | 75 | 44 | |
| III | Southeast | 270 to<br> 010 | 60 | 42 | 75 | 46 | |
| IV | Southeast | 310 to<br> 010 | 60 | 44 | 75 | 45 | |
| V | South | 330 to<br> 040 | 60 | 38 | 75 | 48 | |
| VI | West | 340 to<br> 360 | 60 | 44 | 75 | 45 | |
| VII | West | 000<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> to 020<br><br> <br>140<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> to 180 | 60 | 40 | 75 | 47 | |
| VIII | West | 020 to<br> 060 | 60 | 36 | 75 | 49 | |
| IX | West | 060 to<br> 140 | 60 | 34 | 75 | 50 | |
| X | North | 160<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> to 169<br><br> <br>169<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> to 177 | 60 | 48 | 75 | 43<br><br> <br>34 | |
| MCN | XI | Northeast | 172 to<br> 255 | 60 | 97 | 75 | 28(upper)<br><br> <br>30(lower) |
| XII | Northeast | 255 to<br> 290 | 60 | 51 | 75 | 42 | |
| XIII | Northeast | 140 to<br> 160 | 60 | 44 | 75 | 45 | |
| XIV | Northeast | 172 to<br> 232 | 60 | 80 | 75 | 32 | |
| XV | Southwest | 300 to<br> 040 | 60 | 44 | 75 | 45 | |
| XVI | Southwest | 040 to<br> 100 | 60 | 36 | 75 | 49 | |
| XVII | Southwest | 300 to<br> 040 | 60 | 44 | 75 | 45 | |
| XVIII | Southwest | 100 to<br> 140 | 60 | 40 | 75 | 47 |
Piteau Recommendations:
| • | Complete<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> additional<br> geotechnical<br> drilling, site<br> investigation,<br> and analysis<br> to support FS<br> mine designs<br> and execution. |
|---|---|
| • | Complete<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> additional<br> drilling, site<br> investigation,<br> and analysis<br> to confirm the<br> orientation of<br> critical<br> structures and<br> further inform<br> potentially<br> problematic<br> domains, i.e.,<br> North Domain<br> in MCS and<br> Northeast<br> Domain in MCN. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Adopt<br> pre-split<br> blasting in<br> all<br> geotechnical<br> domains for<br> optimal wall<br> control. <br> Piteau notes<br> trim blasting<br> may be<br> sufficient for<br> the design<br> sectors<br> identified as<br> having slope<br> stability<br> controlled by<br> discrete<br> faults or<br> fault/shear<br> anisotropy. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Horizontal<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> groundwater<br> depressurization<br> may be<br> required in<br> one<br> geotechnical<br> design sector,<br> however, this<br> should be<br> confirmed<br> during the<br> Project’s<br> operating<br> phase. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-4 |
| --- | --- |

GEOTECHNICAL
DESIGN
Pit Walls and Mining Dimensions
The maximum design height of pit walls at MCN is 400 ft and 650 ft at MCS. Consistent with block dimensions in the regularized resource model, the smallest mining unit (SMU) is 20 ft x 20 ft x10 ft (high). While bench heights will be blasted at a minimum of 20 ft, two 10 ft high flitches will be mined in ore zones to maintain selectivity in the vertical direction. Where persistent areas of waste are expected, 40 ft to 60 ft high benches may be blasted and mined with larger loading equipment to improve waste extraction productivity.
While slope design criteria were provided by Piteau for 20 ft, 40 ft, and 60 ft high benches, 60 ft high (triple) benches were selected for most final walls to allow for a steeper inter-ramp angle. Piteau’s recommended bench face angle (BFA) is 75° with an expected break-back angle of 55° to 70°, depending on the geotechnical domain. For the northwest wall of MCN, single, 20 ft bench heights were selected to minimize expected rockfall induced by bench face break-back, as the structural fabric is expected to be adversely oriented into the pit along this wall. At MCS, similar challenges along the northeast walls are mitigated by designing straight north and east walls that meet at a corner to avoid transitioning to a northeast wall orientation that would parallel the problematic structures. It is critical that the orientation of the north and east straight walls fall outside the range of influence of adversely orientated structures. The orientation of adverse structures at these pit wall locations should be confirmed by further drilling.
Geotechnical
Design Sectors
in Planning
Model
The planning model contains coding for geotechnical design sectors developed within Hexagon MinePlan 3D (MP3D) software. The geotechnical coding incorporates Piteau’s 2021 recommendations
for the design
of slopes.
Geotechnical
codes, wall
azimuths, and
overall slope
angles \(OSA –
flattened for
planned in-pit
ramps\) are
used for both
the pit shell
optimization
process and
pit design
\(Figure 13‑2
and Table
13‑3\).
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-5 |
|---|

FIGURE 13‑2 GEOTECHNICAL CODES IN PLANNING MODEL

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-6 |
|---|

TABLE 13‑3 GEOTECHNICAL CODES IN PLANNING MODEL AND OPTIMIZATION SLOPE CODE INPUTS
| Model<br><br> <br>Code | Corresponding<br><br> <br>Design<br> Sector | Wall<br> Azimuth<br><br> (^o^) | Inter-ramp<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Angle<br><br> <br>(^o^) | Overall<br> Slope Angle<br><br> <br>(^o^) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | - | - | 42 | 42 |
| 1 | VI | 340 to<br> 000 | 45 | 41 |
| VII | 000 to<br> 020 | 47 | 43 | |
| VIII | 020 to<br> 060 | 49 | 44 | |
| IX | 060 to<br> 140 | 50 | 43 | |
| - | 140 to<br> 340 | 45 | 45 | |
| 2 | V | 330 to<br> 040 | 48 | 42 |
| - | 040 to<br> 330 | 45 | 45 | |
| 3 | II | 240 to<br> 270 | 44 | 40 |
| III | 270 to<br> 010 | 46 | 42 | |
| - | 010 to<br> 240 | 45 | 45 | |
| 4 | I | 160 to<br> 169 | 43 | 39 |
| X | 169 to<br> 177 | 34 | 31 | |
| X | 177 to<br> 240 | 26 | 24 | |
| XV | 300 to<br> 040 | 45 | 45 | |
| XVI | 040 to<br> 100 | 49 | 45 | |
| XVIII | 100 to<br> 140 | 47 | 43 | |
| - | 240 to<br> 300 | 45 | 45 | |
| - | 140 to<br> 160 | 45 | 45 | |
| 5 | XI | 172 to<br> 255 | 28 | 28 |
| XII | 255 to<br> 280 | 42 | 42 | |
| XIII | 140 to<br> 172 | 45 | 45 | |
| - | 280 to<br> 140 | 45 | 45 | |
| 6 | XI | 172 to<br> 255 | 30 | 30 |
| XII | 255 to<br> 280 | 42 | 42 | |
| XIII | 140 to<br> 172 | 45 | 45 | |
| - | 280 to<br> 140 | 45 | 45 | |
| 7 | XIII | 140 to<br> 172 | 45 | 38 |
| XIV | 172 to<br> 232 | 32 | 28 | |
| - | 232 to<br> 140 | 45 | 45 |
A geotechnical stability analysis was completed on the Project’s waste rock stockpile areas (WRSAs) and confirmed a low risk of WRSA instability. WRSAs are designed with 3:1 side slopes for ease of final reclamation and are generally located on hilltops where adverse sub-surface conditions and movement are not expected.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-7 |
|---|

| 13.1.3. | HYDROLOGICAL<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> AND<br> HYDROGEOLOGICAL<br> CONSIDERATIONS |
|---|
Piteau completed a hydrogeology report and groundwater model in December 2021. A summary of Piteau’s findings is as follows:
| • | Baseline<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> hydrogeological<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> conditions: Overall,<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> the Project<br> area is<br> relatively dry<br> with mean<br> annual<br> precipitation<br> at the site<br> expected to be<br> 11.6 in. The<br> overburden<br> cover is thin<br> and the<br> bedrock has<br> low hydraulic<br> conductivity.<br> As such,<br> groundwater<br> flow and<br> recharge are<br> expected to be<br> minimal. The<br> majority of<br> groundwater<br> recharge is<br> seasonal and<br> results from<br> spring<br> snowmelt.<br> Seasonal<br> groundwater<br> levels have<br> been observed<br> to fluctuate<br> significantly,<br> another<br> indication of<br> the low-flow<br> groundwater<br> regime. |
|---|---|
| • | Operational<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> water<br> management: Most<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> contact water<br> will be<br> collected and<br> managed by way<br> of a perimeter<br> collection<br> ditch that<br> captures the<br> site area,<br> diverting<br> surface water<br> away from the<br> pits.<br> Groundwater<br> inflow into<br> each pit is<br> expected to be<br> minimal (less<br> than six<br> gallons per<br> minute (gpm)<br> in each of MCN<br> and MCS). Pit<br> inflow will be<br> managed by a<br> system of<br> in-pit sumps<br> and will be<br> pumped to the<br> collection<br> basins of the<br> perimeter<br> system. In-pit<br> water<br> management<br> will be<br> required<br> principally<br> during spring<br> snowmelt and<br> after periods<br> of rainfall in<br> the summer and<br> autumn<br> months. Water<br> accumulated in<br> collection<br> basins will be<br> used for dust<br> suppression,<br> with any<br> excess amount<br> expected to be<br> infiltrated or<br> treated as<br> necessary to<br> maintain water<br> quality<br> commitments.<br> During<br> operation,<br> groundwater<br> levels will be<br> monitored by a<br> system of<br> vibrating-wire<br> piezometers<br> (VWP’s)<br> installed in<br> pit walls and<br> monitoring<br> wells at the<br> Project site. <br> Monitored<br> parameters<br> will include<br> water quality,<br> drawdown<br> influence,<br> pore pressures<br> for pit slope<br> stability, and<br> will support<br> reconciliation<br> of the<br> hydrogeological<br> model. |
| --- | --- |
The geotechnical assessment and design criteria by Piteau (2021) also consider the modeled groundwater regime. During mining operations, it is anticipated that the outer 80 ft of exposed slope drains naturally due to blasting and excavation and that this quantity can be managed with in-pit sumps. The northeast walls of MCS may require approximately 33 ft to 50 ft of horizontal depressurization
to achieve
acceptable
factors of
safety.
Depressurization
may be
achieved by
drilling
horizontal
drain holes
once mining
has advanced
below the
groundwater
table. The
extent to
which
horizontal
depressurization
is required
will need to
be confirmed
once mining
has progressed
beyond the
elevation of
the
groundwater
table.
Due to the overall low-flow groundwater regime, dedicated dewatering wells are not expected to be required.
| 13.1.4. | MINE<br> SEQUENCING |
|---|
Both pits will be mined concurrently, with MCN completed first, approximately two years into the overall LOM. Completing extraction in MCN early in the LOM plan is an important Project objective and value driver as it:
| • | Enables<br> hauling of<br> waste rock<br> from MCS<br> directly into<br> MCN, thereby<br> keeping ex-pit<br> haulage costs<br> to a minimum. |
|---|---|
| • | Facilitates<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> short hauls in<br> a<br> truck-constrained<br> period of the<br> LOM plan. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Serves<br> as a long-term<br> waste storage<br> facility to<br> minimize the<br> size of ex-pit<br> waste<br> stockpiles<br> (WRSAs) that<br> would<br> otherwise<br> require<br> rehandling to<br> meet closure<br> obligations. |
| --- | --- |
Maintaining
consistent,
productive
advance at MCS
is critical to
avoiding
period-based
cost overruns
due to mine
life
extensions.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-8 |
|---|

| 13.1.5. | PROCESSING<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> CONSIDERATIONS |
|---|
Other than consideration of metallurgical recovery and processing cost in the planning model, no other processing considerations have been incorporated into the LOM plan. In future, the LOM plan and stockpiling strategy can be adjusted to accommodate new processing objectives or address downstream challenges that could arise with reagent costs, metallurgical recovery at the Fort Knox mill, or downstream metallurgical accounting. The stockpiling strategy may be adjusted to separate different ores (e.g., segregating by pit or alteration type, binning by sulfur grade) and releasing a blended ore to be shipped to Fort Knox. To protect Project value, any adjustments will need to be carefully considered relative to the current stockpiling objective, i.e., prioritizing high-grade Fort Knox mill feed early in the life of the Project.
| 13.2. | MINE<br> CONFIGURATION |
|---|---|
| 13.2.1. | OPEN<br> PIT<br> OPTIMIZATION |
| --- | --- |
The 2021 FS resource and planning models developed by KGMA were used as the basis for pit shell analysis. This analysis was performed using Hexagon MineSight Economic Planner (MSEP) software, which employs the Lerchs-Grossmann algorithm to determine optimized ultimate pit limits.
Key economic inputs are built into the net block cash flow estimates described in Section 12.3. Block cash flow estimates were used as the primary economic driver of pit shell analysis. Pit shell analysis only considered blocks with Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource classifications.
Mining costs were estimated from external quotes received in 2021 through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process for contract mining at Manh Choh. Quotes received include contractor overheads and other period-based costs. Updated mining costs were prepared in early 2023 and are not materially different from 2021 values.
Pit slope inputs are derived based on the inter-ramp angles outlined in Table 13‑4 and flattened to overall slope angles for walls where in-pit ramps are planned.
TABLE 13‑4 PIT SHELL OPTIMIZATION INPUTS
| Item | Unit | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commodity<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Prices | - | - | See<br> Table 12-3 |
| TC / RC<br> / Royalties | - | - | See<br> Table 12-3 |
| Processing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> / G&A<br> Costs | - | - | See<br> Table 12-3 |
| Metallurgical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Recoveries | - | - | See<br> Table 12-3 |
| Mining<br> Cost – Base | $/ton<br> mined | 4.52 | Based<br> on budgetary<br> contractor<br> quotes |
| Mining<br> Cost –<br> Rehandle | $/ton<br> mined | 1.69 | Incr.<br> only for PAG<br> waste |
| Bench<br> Discount Rate | %/year | 10 | |
| Yearly<br> Vertical<br> Advance | #/year | 24 | ~12<br> blasted levels<br> progressed per<br> year |
| Overall<br> Slope Angles | - | - | Table<br> 13‑3 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-9 | ||
| --- | --- |

A series of pit shells were generated based on varying gold price input factors in MSEP. Pit shells corresponding to Mineral Reserve prices of $1,300/oz Au and $17/oz Ag were selected as the basis for the ultimate pit designs. Outlines of the ultimate pit designs are presented in Figure 13‑3 and corresponding pit shell inventories are presented in Table 13‑5.
FIGURE 13‑3 MINERAL RESERVE PIT SHELLS VS. DESIGN PIT OUTLINES

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
TABLE 13‑5 MINERAL RESERVE PIT SHELL INVENTORY
| Pit | Ore<br> Tons<br><br> <br>(kt) | Au<br> Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t–dil) | Ag<br> Grade<br><br> <br>(g/t–dil) | Waste<br><br> <br>Tons<br> (kt) | Total<br> Tons<br><br> <br>(kt) | Strip<br> Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCN | 1,266 | 8.23 | 18.4 | 10,591 | 11,859 | 8.4 |
| MCS | 2,866 | 7.95 | 11.2 | 26,794 | 29,660 | 10.3 |
| Total | 4,132 | 8.04 | 13.4 | 37,385 | 41,517 | 10.0 |
The QP notes that there are portions of the detailed pit designs that vary significantly from the MCN and MCS pit limits suggested by the ultimate pit shell analysis. Overall, this is due to:
| • | The<br> degree of<br> accuracy that<br> is possible<br> when modeling<br> complex pit<br> slopes and<br> transitions in<br> a pit shell<br> optimization<br> as compared to<br> completing<br> detailed<br> design. |
|---|---|
| • | The pit<br> shell<br> optimization<br> over-smooths<br> the influence<br> of in-pit<br> ramps on<br> overall slope<br> angle. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> narrower than<br> minimum mining<br> widths that<br> result during<br> pit shell<br> optimization. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> degree of<br> accuracy that<br> is possible<br> when allowing<br> the pit shell<br> optimization<br> to achieve the<br> corner design<br> for the<br> northeast wall<br> of MCS. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-10 |
| --- | --- |

Several pit shell sensitivity scenarios were investigated, including sensitivity to metal price, mining cost, transport and processing cost, and slope angles. Generally, there is no material change to the ultimate pit limits for a range of the Base Case inputs. This is a result of the high grade, high margin nature of the in-situ mineralization.
Generally,
as costs
increase or
metal prices
decrease, the
ultimate pit
limits remain
unaffected
with
corresponding
ore and waste
inventories
changing by
way of a
changing the
internal
cut-off
value. As pit
slopes
shallow, the
pit shells
tend to
achieve the
same pit
bottom
elevation and
width, with
more waste
added to the
pit walls.
Below a gold price of approximately $900/oz (or with a corresponding increase in costs), MCS becomes significantly smaller and shallower, while MCN becomes shallower at both the northwest and southeast pit bottoms. Above a gold price of approximately $2,000/oz (or with a corresponding decrease in costs), MCS expands slightly to the west, with minimal additions or depth extensions at either MCN or MCS pit bottoms.
MCN and MCS ultimate pit limits are based on the results of the pit shell optimization process previously described. There are no physical or regulatory limitations on where the ultimate pit limits are located, however, there is limited flexibility to expand the pits into areas designated as wetlands and minor concessions have been made to mitigate wetlands disturbance. To ensure pit slope and WRSA stability, permanent WRSA footprints were offset from design pit limits by 200 ft.
| 13.2.2. | MINE<br> DESIGN |
|---|
OPEN PITS
To accommodate a fleet of 100-ton class haul trucks, a 75 ft wide, double-lane ramp design was selected, with major ex-pit haul roads designed at a width of 80 ft. Both MCN and MCS pit designs incorporate 45 ft wide, single-lane ramps close to the pit bottom where ex-pit mining rates and haul truck traffic are expected to be reduced as mining progresses through narrow, high-grade zones. All in-pit ramps and ex-pit mine roads are designed at a maximum gradient of 10%. Pit designs ensure minimum mining widths in excess of 100 ft for most benches, with some pit bottom benches having 70 ft to 80 ft minimum widths in narrow ore zones. The final 10 ft to 20 ft high benches at the pit bottoms are shown without ramp access and retreat mining of the ramp will be carried out to maximize ore recovery.
As the MCN and MCS pit designs come within 100 ft of each other, a dedicated ramp cut has been designed to establish a wide inter-pit intersection that also acts as a major throughway from the northwest to the southeast of the mine site (Figure 13‑4).
Figure 13‑5 and Figure 13‑6 show the MCS and MCN pit designs, respectively.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-11 |
|---|

FIGURE 13‑4 MANH CHOH PIT DESIGNS

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
FIGURE 13‑5 MCS DESIGN, PHASES 1 AND 2

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-12 |
|---|

FIGURE 13‑6 MCN DESIGN

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
The MCS phasing strategy was selected to ensure early availability of high-grade ore for transport to Fort Knox. The MCS Phase 1 starter pit (MCS P1) is not based on a nested pit shell but rather targets the shallower portion of high-grade mineralization at MCS, which is temporarily truncated by lower grades and waste below MCS P1. The purpose of the starter pit is to achieve an adequate ore stockpile inventory early in the mine life such that the ore transport contractor has sufficient high-grade material available during their ramp-up period. The upper benches of MCS Phase 2 (MCS P2) are mined in conjunction with MCS P1 as MCS P2 is an important source of clean waste rock (i.e., non-acid generating or non-metal leaching) for building stockpile footprints and mine infrastructure early in the mine life. The MCS pit phases are shown in Figure 13‑7.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-13 |
|---|

FIGURE 13‑7 MCS PIT PHASES

Source: KGMA, 2022a.
MCN was not sub-divided into phases to eliminate the need for an independent ramp system in the northwest lobe of MCN. Once MCN is established to the saddle between both pit bottoms at 2,960 FASL, the mine sequence dives into the northwest pit bottom, to uncover higher grade ore and to create capacity for in-pit backfilling as early as possible.
SURFACE LAYOUT DESIGN
The Manh Choh mine site layout (Figure 13‑8) is designed to achieve two principal objectives:
| • | Minimize<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> wetlands<br> disturbance. |
|---|---|
| • | Work<br> inwards from<br> the surface<br> water<br> collection<br> ditch system,<br> which is<br> designed to<br> passively<br> drain to<br> collection<br> points. |
| --- | --- |
To the extent possible, WRSAs, waste stockpiles, and other surface infrastructure have been confined to uplands resulting in shorter hauls from the pit to key haulage destinations. Major on-surface infrastructure includes:
| • | The<br> Main WRSA,<br> southeast of<br> MCS, for clean<br> waste rock and<br> low-sulfur,<br> PAG rock<br> (low-S PAG). |
|---|---|
| • | The<br> North WRSA,<br> northeast of<br> MCN, for clean<br> waste rock and<br> low-S PAG. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> North Gap<br> WRSA, between<br> MCN and the<br> North WRSA. <br> This is an<br> overflow<br> facility for<br> clean waste<br> rock and low-S<br> PAG once MCN<br> has been<br> backfilled to<br> at least the<br> pit rim. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-14 |
| --- | --- |

| • | The Dry<br> Stockpile, to<br> receive waste<br> material and<br> potentially<br> metal leaching<br> rock (NAG-ML)<br> for subsequent<br> rehandle to<br> the MCN Dry<br> Backfill<br> destination. |
|---|---|
| • | The Wet<br> Stockpile, to<br> receive waste<br> material and<br> PAG rock for<br> rehandle to<br> the MCS<br> Submerged<br> Backfill<br> destination. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> Stockpile Pad,<br> located<br> underneath the<br> Wet and Dry<br> stockpiles, to<br> receive clean<br> waste rock for<br> waste<br> stockpile<br> footprints. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Two<br> overburden<br> stockpiles for<br> low-permeability<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> material used<br> in closure<br> objectives. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> Marginal Ore<br> Stockpile, to<br> receive<br> sub-economic<br> material<br> between<br> resource and<br> reserve<br> planning<br> prices<br> ($1,600/oz and<br> $1,300/oz Au,<br> respectively). |
| --- | --- |
Major mine infrastructure such as the truck shop, warehouse, truck park-up, and offices will be located on a mine infrastructure pad north of MCN and surrounded by the North WRSA.
Organic cover in the mine site area is limited in thickness and will be cut and pushed to the toe of the key disturbance areas uphill of surface water collection ditches.
FIGURE 13‑8 MINE SITE LAYOUT

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
The ore
stockpiles and
load-out
facility are
located
approximately
2,900 ft north
of the mine
site. The
load-out
location was
selected to
prevent mixing
of highway
truck and mine
haul truck
traffic and to
avoid highway
trucks having
to traverse a
final stretch
of elevated
topography.
In-pit backfilling in both pits is critical to the Project’s waste management plan and achieving geochemical objectives in the Project closure plan. In-pit backfill areas include (Figure 13‑9 to Figure 13‑11):
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-15 |
|---|

| • | MCN<br> Submerged<br> Backfill, to<br> 2,950 FASL,<br> comprising<br> clean waste<br> rock that does<br> not influence<br> long-term<br> groundwater<br> quality. |
|---|---|
| • | MCN<br> Lower Dry<br> Backfill, to<br> pre-mine<br> topography,<br> for dry<br> disposal of<br> NAG-ML and PAG<br> waste rock. |
| --- | --- |
| • | MCN<br> Upper Dry<br> Backfill,<br> built above<br> pre-mine<br> topography to<br> 3,310 FASL. |
| --- | --- |
| • | MCS<br> Submerged<br> Backfill, to<br> 2,960 FASL,<br> comprising PAG<br> waste rock to<br> be submerged<br> to prevent<br> oxidation. |
| --- | --- |
| • | MCS<br> Clean Buffer<br> Backfill, to<br> 3,000 FASL,<br> comprising<br> clean waste<br> rock to cover<br> the expected<br> seasonal<br> fluctuations<br> in groundwater<br> levels at MCS. |
| --- | --- |
| • | MCS<br> Pitwall<br> Backfill,<br> built to 3,100<br> FASL, to cover<br> the southeast<br> pit wall where<br> PAG may be<br> exposed in the<br> ultimate pit. |
| --- | --- |
FIGURE 13‑9 PLAN VIEW OF IN-PIT BACKFILL

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-16 |
|---|

FIGURE 13‑10 MCS IN-PIT BACKFILL

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
FIGURE
13‑11 MCN
IN-PIT
BACKFILL

Source: KGMA, 2022a.
In support of closure activities, the mining fleet will:
| • | Rehandle<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> materials in<br> the Dry and<br> Wet Stockpiles<br> to designated<br> dry and<br> submerged<br> in-pit<br> locations. |
|---|---|
| • | Rehandle<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> materials in<br> Stockpile Pad<br> and Main WRSA<br> to designated<br> in-pit<br> locations. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Re-sloping<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> of WRSAs to<br> achieve 3:1<br> reclamation<br> slopes. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Rehandle<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> overburden and<br> low-permeability<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> material to<br> cover MCN<br> Upper Dry<br> Backfill<br> areas. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-17 |
| --- | --- |

| 13.3. | DESIGN<br> OF WASTE<br> STORAGE<br> FACILITIES |
|---|
Generally,
on-surface
WRSAs have
been sited
near hilltops
to minimize
wetlands
disturbance
and to help
ensure
sub-surface
stability.
Respecting a
minimum 200 ft
offset, WRSAs
are located
close to the
open pits to
minimize
overall
haulage
requirements
and to fit
within the
outer
perimeter
system of
water
collection
ditches. Site
preparation
will include
removal of
organics and
loosely
consolidated
overburden in
the WRSA
footprints.
A geotechnical stability analysis was completed on the Project’s WRSAs and confirmed a low risk of WRSA instability. WRSAs are designed with 3:1 side slopes for ease of final reclamation and are generally located on hilltops where adverse sub-surface conditions and movement are not expected. The WRSA slope design criteria are summarized in Table 13‑6.
Generally,
on-surface
WRSAs have
been sited
near hilltops
to minimize
wetlands
disturbance
and to help
ensure
sub-surface
stability.
Respecting a
minimum 200 ft
offset, WRSAs
are located
close to the
open pits to
minimize
overall
haulage
requirements
and to fit
within the
outer
perimeter
system of
water
collection
ditches. Site
preparation
will include
removal of
organics and
loosely
consolidated
overburden in
the WRSA
footprints.
A geotechnical stability analysis was completed on the Project’s WRSAs and confirmed a low risk of WRSA instability. WRSAs are designed with 3:1 side slopes for ease of final reclamation and are generally located on hilltops where adverse sub-surface conditions and movement are not expected. The WRSA slope design criteria are summarized in Table 13‑6.
TABLE 13‑6 WRSA SLOPE DESIGN CRITERIA
| WRSA | Lift<br> Height<br><br> (ft) | Catch<br> Bench Width<br> (ft) | Lift<br> Face Angle (°) | Overall<br> Slope Angle<br> (°) | Top<br> Elevation<br><br> <br>(FASL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main<br> WRSA | 50 | 80 | 34 | 18 | 3,450 |
| North<br> WRSA | 50 | 80 | 34 | 18 | 3,310 |
During the Project’s operating phase, waste rock swell factors will be investigated to confirm WRSA designs and storage capacity. In the event that additional waste rock storage capacity is required, or MCN in-pit backfill capacity is not available as planned, sections of the Main WRSA may be constructed to greater than 3:1 slopes. When clean backfill is required at the end of the mine life, waste rock should be sourced from WRSAs with slopes steeper than 3:1 to achieve closure objectives.
Generally,
dump lifts and
tip heads have
a minimum
width of at
least 100 ft.
The WRSA
construction
sequence has
been developed
to minimize
haulage
requirements
in all
periods,
identifying
and exploiting
the shortest
hauls
available from
each pit
source. Table
13‑7
summarizes the
waste balance
for major WRSA
and stockpile
facilities.
Due to their temporary nature, the Dry, Wet, and Overburden Stockpiles are designed at the expected angle of repose for their corresponding materials (approximately 34^o^).
The MCN Upper
Dry Backfill
area is
designed
without
benches as
dozers will
slope this
material to
3:1 during
waste
placement.
Condemnation
drilling by
Peak Gold at
the proposed
WRSA locations
confirmed
mineralization
below these
structures,
however,
mineralization
grades and
widths are not
sufficient to
support an
economic case
for
extraction.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-18 |
|---|

TABLE 13‑7 WASTE BALANCE – MAJOR WRSA AND STOCKPILE FACILITIES
| WRSA/Stockpile | Waste<br> Types | Max.<br> Operating<br> Inventory (kt) | Inventory<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> at Closure<br> (kt) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main<br> WRSA | Clean,<br> low-S PAG | 14,230 | 13,097 |
| North<br> WRSA | Clean,<br> low-S PAG | 6,846 | 6,846 |
| North<br> Gap WRSA | Clean | 922 | 922 |
| Dry<br> Stockpile | NAG-ML | 6,023 | 0 |
| Wet<br> Stockpile | PAG | 7,064 | 0 |
| Stockpile<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Pad | Clean | 2,455 | 0 |
| Overburden<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Stockpiles | Overburden | 990 | 0 |
| Roads<br> and<br> Infrastructure | Clean | 329 | 329 |
| Marginal<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Ore Stockpile | Ore | 778 | 0 |
| MCN<br> Submerged<br> Backfill | Clean | 1,020 | 1,020 |
| MCN<br> Lower Dry<br> Backfill | Low-S<br> PAG, NAG-ML | 12,553 | 12,553 |
| MCN<br> Upper Dry<br> Backfill | Low-S<br> PAG, PAG,<br> NAG-ML | 4,429 | 4,429 |
| MCS<br> Submerged<br> Backfill | PAG | 5,953 | 5,953 |
| MCS<br> Clean Buffer<br> Backfill | Clean | 2,013 | 2,013 |
| MCS<br> Pitwall<br> Backfill | Clean | 1,575 | 1,575 |
| 13.4. | ORE<br> INVENTORY | ||
| --- | --- |
Table 13-8 summarizes the ore inventory for the Project’s LOM plan.
TABLE 13‑8 ORE INVENTORY
| Item | Unit | Manh<br> Choh South | Manh<br> Choh North | Ramp<br> Cut | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Phase 2 | |||||
| Ore | 000 t | 489 | 2,215 | 1,231 | 3,935 | |
| Au<br> Grade (dil) | g/t | 8.56 | 7.71 | 7.91 | - | 7.88 |
| Ag<br> Grade (dil) | g/t | 12.4 | 11.2 | 18.4 | - | 13.6 |
| Cont.<br> Au | 000<br> oz | 135 | 549 | 313 | - | 997 |
| Cont.<br> Ag | 000<br> oz | 195 | 796 | 727 | - | 1,718 |
| Waste | 000 t | 1,178 | 29,727 | 14,335 | 561 | 45,801 |
| Total<br> Mined | 000 t | 1,667 | 31,942 | 15,566 | 561 | 49,736 |
| Strip<br> Ratio | - | 2.41 | 13.42 | 11.64 | - | 11.64 |
Notes:
| 1. | Ore<br> inventory<br> excludes<br> Inferred<br> Resources. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Totals<br> may not sum<br> due to<br> rounding. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-19 |
| --- | --- |

| 13.5. | MINE<br> PRODUCTION<br> SEQUENCE AND<br> SCHEDULES |
|---|
Mining aspects of the FS LOM plan were optimized using Hexagon’s suite of planning software, including MineSight Haulage (MSHaulage) and MinePlan Schedule Optimizer (MPSO).
Based on the FS, mining activities at the Project are projected to commence in July 2023 with the start of the pre-production period. Priorities for material movement during the pre-production phase are:
| • | Stripping<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> organics and<br> overburden. |
|---|---|
| • | Mining<br> MCS P1 to<br> build<br> high-grade ore<br> stockpiles<br> ahead of ore<br> transport<br> ramp-up. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Mining<br> MCS P2 and MCN<br> to expedite<br> sinking of the<br> large pits and<br> to source<br> clean waste<br> rock for<br> construction<br> priorities. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Building<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> mine roads and<br> the Stockpile<br> Pad using<br> clean waste<br> rock. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Stockpiling<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> any PAG,<br> NAG-ML, or<br> marginal ore<br> encountered<br> during<br> extraction<br> activities. |
| --- | --- |
The pre-production period lasts until first transport of ore to Fort Knox, in January 2024, at which time the production period begins. Capital stripping for each pit is not defined by this time period, rather, it is defined by the 5/4ths rule where waste is capitalized initially in the mining sequence if the bench strip ratio exceeds 5/4ths of the overall pit strip ratio.
MCN mining is completed in August 2025 and corresponding in-pit backfill capacity becomes available for receiving waste from mining the remainder of MCS P2. Mining of MCS P2 is on the critical path to completion of the overall mining sequence, with expected completion in July 2027, four years after mining begins (Figure 13‑12).
FIGURE 13‑12 ANNUAL MINING RATE BY PHASE

Source: KGMA,
2022a.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-20 |
|---|

Overall,
the ex-pit
mining rate
fluctuates
between 15
Mtpa and 17
Mtpa \(Figure
13‑13\), with
peak ex-pit
production
expected in
2024 when
in-pit hauls
are short and
mining is
occurring in
both pits
simultaneously.
While the ore
delivery rate
to Fort Knox
is set at a
steady-state
1.1 Mtpa
\(3,000 stpd\),
the ex-pit ore
mining rate
fluctuates
between 0.8
Mtpa and 1.3
Mtpa depending
on the mining
sequence.
Ex-pit ore
mining will be
complete in Q3
2027 with
shipping of
the remaining
ore stockpiles
expected to
continue
through Q1
2028 \(Figure
13‑14\).
FIGURE 13‑13 QUARTERLY ORE AND WASTE MINING RATES

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
FIGURE 13‑14 ANNUAL ORE STOCKPILE MOVEMENT

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
Managing
the sequence
and use of
major waste
destinations
will be
critical to
mitigate
stockpiling,
rehandling,
and long-haul
requirements
for the
haulage
fleet. The
general
sequence for
major WRSAs
and waste
destinations
is summarized
in Figure
13‑15 and
further
described as
follows:
| • | Pre-production:<br> Clean waste is<br> sent to the<br> Stockpile Pad<br> footprint and<br> mine roads<br> along with<br> other<br> miscellaneous<br> construction<br> priorities.<br> Low-sulfur PAG<br> material is<br> sent to either<br> the North or<br> Main WRSA,<br> while any PAG<br> or NAG-ML<br> waste is<br> placed in the<br> appropriate<br> waste<br> stockpile. |
|---|---|
| • | Production<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> – Q1 2024 to<br> Q3 2025 (MCN<br> northwest pit<br> bottom<br> achieved): Clean<br> waste and<br> low-sulfur PAG<br> is sent to<br> either the<br> North or Main<br> WRSA,<br> prioritized by<br> shortest haul<br> route from<br> either pit to<br> the active<br> dump lift. Any<br> PAG or NAG-ML<br> encountered is<br> still placed<br> in the<br> appropriate<br> waste<br> stockpile. The<br> North WRSA<br> (excluding the<br> North Gap<br> WRSA) is<br> expected to be<br> complete in<br> this time<br> period. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-21 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Production<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> – Q3 2025 to<br> Q3 2027 (MCS<br> complete): Once<br> the MCN<br> northwest pit<br> bottom has<br> been extracted<br> and placement<br> of clean waste<br> has been<br> completed in<br> the Lower<br> Submerged<br> Backfill area,<br> low-sulfur PAG<br> and NAG-ML<br> extracted from<br> the pit are<br> diverted<br> directly to<br> the MCN Dry<br> Backfill<br> location. In<br> this period,<br> no material is<br> added to the<br> Dry Stockpile<br> and a gradual<br> rehandling of<br> the Dry<br> Stockpile into<br> the MCN Dry<br> Backfill<br> location<br> occurs. Any<br> PAG material<br> encountered is<br> placed in the<br> Wet Stockpile.<br> Clean waste<br> will continue<br> to be sent to<br> the Main WRSA<br> until the<br> facility<br> reaches its<br> capacity and<br> any remaining<br> clean waste<br> encountered in<br> the LOM plan<br> will be<br> diverted to<br> the MCN Dry<br> Backfill<br> location. |
|---|---|
| • | Production<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> / End of<br> Mining /<br> Active Closure<br> Q3 2027+: When<br> all ex-pit<br> mining is<br> complete, PAG<br> material from<br> the Wet<br> Stockpile is<br> rehandled to<br> the MCS<br> Submerged<br> Backfill<br> location,<br> followed by<br> rehandling of<br> clean waste<br> from the<br> Stockpile Pad<br> or Main WRSA<br> to construct<br> the MCS Buffer<br> Backfill and<br> Pitwall<br> Backfill<br> facilities. If<br> the final<br> elevation of<br> the MCS<br> Submerged<br> Backfill<br> facility is<br> achieved<br> before the Wet<br> Stockpile is<br> completely<br> rehandled,<br> excess PAG<br> will be<br> rehandled to<br> the MCN Dry<br> Backfill<br> facility. <br> During<br> closure, the<br> main<br> rehandling<br> activities<br> into MCS<br> backfill<br> facilities are<br> expected to<br> extend to Q2<br> 2028. |
| --- | --- |
FIGURE 13‑15 ANNUAL WASTE MOVEMENT BY DESTINATION (REHANDLE INCLUDED)

Source:
KGMA, 2022a.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-22 |
|---|

| 13.6. | MINE<br> EQUIPMENT AND<br> FACILITIES |
|---|---|
| 13.6.1. | MINE<br> EQUIPMENT –<br> LOADING AND<br> HAULING |
| --- | --- |
The current mine plan considers a haulage fleet of 100-ton class trucks (e.g., CAT 777 or equivalent). The number of haul units fluctuates over the course of the LOM plan, with fewer units required when haul distances are shorter and during rehandle activities for reclamation.
The LOM plan includes four principal loading units. Ore loading will be performed primarily by two small excavators with 8 yd^3^ to 9 yd^3^ buckets (e.g., CAT 6015-B or equivalent). These units are sized to execute the selective mining required by the ore control program (two to three bucket widths span the desired SMU and they are able to set-up on 10 ft flitches). Waste loading will be performed primarily by one large face shovel (approximately 22 yd^3^ bucket, CAT 6030 or equivalent) and one large front-end loader (approximately 15 yd^3^ bucket, CAT 992 or equivalent). The aforementioned units have acceptable pass matching for loading 100-ton class (CAT 777) trucks:
| • | CAT<br> 6015-B: six<br> to seven<br> passes |
|---|---|
| • | CAT<br> 6030: three<br> to four passes |
| --- | --- |
| • | CAT<br> 992: four to<br> five passes |
| --- | --- |
The LOM plan was informed by wireframes in each pit that delineate internal ore zones and external waste zones, plus a 50 ft buffer. The buffer zones were scheduled to simulate ore mining equipment working across the ore/waste boundary to cleanly separate ore and waste, minimizing dilution. The LOM plan assumes only small excavators will selectively mine ore zones, i.e., LOM plan ore production rates account for consistent, selective mining in ore. Conversely, small excavators are not deployed for any waste stockpile rehandle during reclamation.
As the Project life is approximately 4.6 years, no provision has been made for major mining equipment rebuilds or replacements. Due to the climate at the Project site, all major mining equipment will be outfitted with arctic climate or cold weather packages.
Key mining equipment performance metrics are based on both internal and external benchmarks for similar equipment, are unchanged in all LOM plan time periods, and are used as a measure of maximum productive hours to drive the LOM plan (Table 13‑9 and Table 13‑10). Over the LOM plan, equipment utilization fluctuates below the maximum/target level when the maximum sinking rate is reached, when there is a lack of rehandle material available for all loader types, or there is a loading or haulage constraint in a given time period.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-23 |
|---|

TABLE 13‑9 KEY PERFORMANCE METRICS – LOAD AND HAUL
| Unit | Peak<br> Units | Productivity<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> (tph) | Availability | Max.<br> Utilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT 777 | 10 | 280 | 85% | 80% |
| CAT<br> 6015-B | 2 | 550 | 85% | 80% |
| CAT<br> 6030 | 1 | 1500 | 85% | 80% |
| CAT 992 | 1 | 1000 | 85% | 80% |
| 13.6.2. | MINE<br> EQUIPMENT –<br> DRILLING AND<br> BLASTING | |||
| --- | --- |
The LOM plan will require both rotary production drills and top-hammer pre-split drills. Both drill types will be capable of drilling 4 in. to 6¾ in. blastholes on a single-pass, 20-ft bench height. Benches in ore will be drilled and blasted at 20-ft heights and mined on 10-ft high flitches. Benches in waste will be blasted at 40-ft heights, followed by mining the full 40-ft face using the large face shovels with dozer support.
The overall blast design strategy targets a blasted P80 of 14 in. to 16 in. Fragmentation and oversize control will be of utmost importance given the ore transported to Fort Knox will be uncrushed, run-of-mine. Blast designs were informed by a fragmentation assessment by Orica USA Inc. A nominal 12.5 ft x 14.4 ft pattern with 3 ft of sub-drill was selected for most ore and waste shots, with a wider pattern of 15.1 ft x 17.4 ft selected for oxide waste materials. Penetration rates for both drill types are based on internal and external benchmarks and are variable based on rock alteration. Ore penetration rates have been de-rated to allow for blasthole sampling at 10-ft intervals on 20-ft blastholes. The LOM plan assumes all in-pit material requires blasting.
| 13.6.3. | MINE<br> EQUIPMENT –<br> ANCILLARY<br> EQUIPMENT |
|---|
Major support equipment required to achieve the LOM plan is summarized in Table 13‑12.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-24 |
|---|

TABLE 13‑10 ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT LIST
| Unit | Representative<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Model | Units<br> Required |
|---|---|---|
| Dozer –<br> production<br> support | CAT D9 | 4 |
| Dozer –<br> miscellaneous<br> support | CAT D6 | 1 |
| Mine<br> Grader | CAT 16M | 1 |
| Small<br> Graders – site<br> services | CAT 14M | 2 |
| Rubber-tire<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Dozer –<br> miscellaneous<br> support | CAT 834<br> RTD | 1 |
| Small<br> Excavator –<br> miscellaneous<br> support | CAT 320 | 1 |
| Mine<br> Water Truck | CAT 740<br> Custom Box | 1 |
| Tire<br> Handler | L220H | 1 |
| Light<br> Duty Trucks | 4 | |
| Light<br> Plants | 12 | |
| Utility<br> Truck w/ Boom<br> Crane | 1 | |
| Haul<br> Road Gravel<br> Spreader | 1 | |
| Stemming<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Loader | 1 | |
| Crew<br> Busses | 3 | |
| Mechanic’s<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Trucks | 1 | |
| Welder’s<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Trucks | 1 | |
| Explosives<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Trucks | 1 | |
| Small<br> Water Trucks | 1 | |
| Forklift | 1 |
An additional front-end loader (CAT 966, CAT 988, or equivalent) will be dedicated to operating in ore stockpiles to load third-party highway trucks that will transport ore to Fort Knox.
| 13.7. | MINE<br> LABOR<br> REQUIREMENTS |
|---|
Generally,
the Project’s
labor strategy
will include
both shared
responsibilities
with existing
Fort Knox
roles and
dedicated Manh
Choh labor on
rotational
schedules.
The mine’s
organizational
structure will
not feature a
dedicated Mine
Manager, with
the top
site-based
operational
roles \(Mine
Superintendent,
Mine General
Foreman\)
reporting to
the Fort Knox
Mine Manager.
Similarly,
the Technical
Services team
will not
feature a
dedicated
Chief Engineer
or Technical
Services
Manager, with
both roles
combining with
existing Fort
Knox-based
equivalents.
The on-site
Technical
Services team
will be
responsible
for
short-range
mine planning,
geotechnical
monitoring,
field geology
and ore
control,
environmental
monitoring,
and site
survey. Mid
and long-range
mine planning,
resource
modeling, and
other
technical
functions will
be performed
by the Fort
Knox Technical
Services team.
Dedicated
Manh Choh
labor
requirements
are summarized
in Table
13‑13.
At the time of report preparation, additional contracted service opportunities were being investigated and are considered viable for the Project (e.g., full contract mining or sub-components such as at-the-hole explosives delivery or drilling and blasting). Should the Project owners decide to adopt additional contracted services as part of the Project’s operating model, the Project’s labor and management structure will be adjusted. In any contract or hybrid operating structure, the key technical and operating functions will report to KGMA, the operator and manager of the Project.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-25 |
|---|

TABLE 13‑11 MANH CHOH LABOR REQUIREMENTS
| Role | Rotation | Empl. <br> Per Role | Number<br> of Roles | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | |||
| Mine<br> Maintenance | ||||||||
| Mine<br> Maintenance.<br> Superintendent | 4x3<br> Day Shift | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Sr.<br> Maintenance<br> General<br> Foreman | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Maintenance<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Supervisor | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Maintenance<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Trainer | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Sr.<br> Maintenance<br> Planner | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Tire<br> Technician | 2/x<br> Day + Night | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Welder | 2/x<br> Day + Night | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Mobile<br> Mechanic | 2/x<br> Day + Night | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 |
| Facilities<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Maintenance | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Fuel +<br> Lube Mechanic | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| General<br> Laborer | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Mine<br> Operations | ||||||||
| Mine<br> Superintendent | 4x3<br> Day Shift | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Mine<br> General<br> Foreman | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Sr.<br> Mine<br> Supervisor | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Mine<br> Supervisor | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| D&B<br> Supervisor | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Blaster | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Dewatering<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Technician | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Dispatch<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Operator | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Dispatch<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Technician | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Drill<br> Technician | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Drill<br> Operator | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| Mine<br> Trainer | 2/2<br> Day Shift | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Loader<br> Operator | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Truck<br> Operator | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 3 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 3 |
| Dozer<br> Operator | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Grader<br> Operator | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Utility<br> Operator | 2/2<br> Day + Night | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Services | ||||||||
| Geology<br> Technician | 7x7<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-26 | |||||||
| --- | --- |

| Role | Rotation | Empl. <br> Per Role | Number<br> of Roles | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | |||
| Mine<br> Engineer | 7x7<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Mine<br> Geologist | 7x7<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Senior<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Engineer | 7x7<br> Day Shift | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Surveyor | 7x7<br> Day Shift | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 13-27 | |||||||
| --- | --- |

| 14. | PROCESSING<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> AND RECOVERY<br> METHODS |
|---|---|
| 14.1. | FACILITY<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> DESCRIPTION |
| --- | --- |
The Fort Knox process plant was designed to process ore 24 hours per day, 365 days per year at a nominal capacity of 36,000 stpd. The current design feed rate for the Manh Choh ore will be approximately one-third of the design capacity and modifications to certain areas of the process plant will be required.
The existing Fort Knox processing facility will be modified to process Manh Choh ore on a campaign or batch basis (the Mill Modification). Ore campaigns or batches will be approximately 240,000 st, equivalent to approximately 30 days of processing. Figure 14‑1 presents a simplified block flow diagram of the modified process.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-1 |
|---|

FIGURE 14‑1 SIMPLIFIED BLOCK FLOW DIAGRAM OF MODIFIED PROCESS

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-2 |
|---|

| 14.1.1. | ORE<br> HANDLING AND<br> LEACH/CIP<br> CIRCUITS |
|---|
ROM ore will be trucked from the Manh Choh mine site to the Fort Knox processing facility. Ore will be transported to site using highway trucks which will side dump onto a coarse ore stockpile. Ore will be reclaimed by a front-end loader (FEL) from the coarse ore stockpile and transported to the gyratory crusher via Fort Knox mine haul trucks.
The crushing circuit is designed to crush approximately 26.6 million stpa of Fort Knox ore, however, the Manh Choh ore will be crushed on a batch or campaign basis four times a year. Crushed ore will be conveyed to a crushed ore stockpile with a live capacity of 20,000 st and drawn from the crushed ore stockpile using variable speed apron feeders feeding the SAG mill feed conveyor.
Hydrated
lime and
cement are
added onto the
conveyor belt
that feeds the
SAG mill to
regulate the
pH in the
cyanide
leaching
circuit and
improve
metallurgical
performance. A
new 100 st
cement silo
will be
required for
this.
The SAG mill product will discharge onto a wet vibrating screen where the undersize will flow into a common mill sump along with the ball mill product. The screen oversize will report to the pebble crusher to further reduce the critical size material which will then be recycled back to the feed end of the SAG mill.
SAG mill discharge screen undersize and ball mill discharge will return to a common sump where it will be pumped to a set of hydrocyclones. Ball mill No. 2 will operate in closed circuit with the hydrocyclones. Cyclone underflow will be split between the SAG mill feed chute and the ball mill feed chute. Cyclone underflow discharge to the SAG feed chute will require the reconnection of a pre-existing line that was previously disconnected.
The portion of the SAG and ball mill discharge streams that is drawn from the common sump using the existing pump and line will feed the gravity gold recovery circuit, which incorporates a scalping screen where the undersize material feeds a Knelson concentrator. Gravity concentrator tails will be returned to the mill sump along with screen oversize material. Gravity concentrate will be periodically dumped from the concentrator and will report to the intensive cyanidation unit (Acacia Reactor). Leached pregnant solution will then be pumped to the dedicated Acacia electrowinning cells for gold recovery while the tails as mentioned will be returned to the grinding circuit (ball mill sump).
To achieve the required cut size of 80% passing 75 microns the existing 26 in. cyclones will need to be replaced with new 20 in. cyclones. The existing cyclone tub, feed distributor, cyclone feed pump and feed line will not be replaced or modified as the current arrangement, mechanical equipment, and piping has been found to be adequate. Smaller nozzles sizes will be required for the cyclone feed end to avoid replacing the existing knife gate valves.
The cyclone overflow will flow to trash screens to remove grit and wood chips. Screen underflow will report to the pre-leach thickener where flocculant is added to aid in the settling process. Thickener underflow will be pumped to the leach circuit. Due to the reduction in flow, a new thickener underflow pump and line to the grit feed distributor box will be required. In addition, a new line from the thickener feed box and a line to the grit screen distribution box will also be required.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-3 |
|---|

The exiting 24 in. lines will be replaced with new 14 in. lines to maintain the appropriate velocity within the pipe to eliminate any chance of solids settling in the line. Due to the reduced flow rates, it was found that only two leach tanks will be required to provide adequate retention time. However due to the higher-grade material and to maintain the gold absorption kinetics, all six CIP tanks will be required to maximize the absorption of the gold onto the activated carbon. Discharge from the pre-leach thickener along with cyanide addition will be sent to the drop box located within leach tank No.1, however, due to the lower retention time required for Manh Choh ore, a new 14 in. line will be installed to permit some leach tanks to be by-passed and slurry sent directly to leach tanks No. 6 and No. 7.
The slurry from leach tank No. 7 will flow by gravity and split into two streams feeding both CIP tank No. 1 and CIP tank No. 2 simultaneously, thus operating the top end of the circuit in parallel. CIP tank No. 1 will also be able to feed CIP tank No. 2, allowing the tanks to run in series if required. Discharge from both tanks will join and feed CIP tank No. 3, which will cascade downward to feed the rest of the CIP tanks in series. Carbon will be withdrawn from both CIP tanks No. 1 and 2 to feed two new loaded carbon dewatering screens. Fresh and regenerated carbon will still be fed into CIP tank No. 6 as per the current method of operation. Carbon in each tank is transferred counter-currently to the slurry flow until the carbon reaches its maximum gold loading, then it is pumped to the gold elution circuit. Return slurry from the loaded carbon screen underflow will also be split between CIP tanks No.1 and No.2.
Tails from the CIP circuit will then flow by gravity to the tailings thickener which will then pump the slurry to the carbon safety screens to minimize the possibility of loaded carbon exiting the circuit. To improve thickener efficiency a new feedwell will be required. To enhance mixing of the slurry within the feedwell an auto dilution system has been recommended but is not part of the modification to the thickener. A new thickener underflow pump will be required along with a new 12-inch line that will discharge to Safety Screen Distributor.
| 14.1.2. | ELUTION<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> CIRCUIT |
|---|
The elution circuit is operated on the principle of the Zadra process using two stripping vessels simultaneously. The gold is stripped from carbon using hot, caustic-cyanide solution, which is then sent to the electrowinning cells to precipitate the gold onto the electrowinning cells’ cathodes. The sludge from the cathodes is filtered, dried in a securely monitored oven, and melted down to produce doré bars. After stripping, carbon is acid washed or sent to be reactivated in a kiln before returning to the CIP circuit.
Manh Choh ore is approximately 10 times richer in gold content than the Fort Knox ore that is currently being processed. Due to its higher gold content, the ore will require additional carbon to maintain low solution losses. Total carbon transfer from CIP tanks No.1 and No. 2 will total approximately 38 stpd. The slurry and carbon from CIP tanks No.1 and 2 will be sent to two new loaded carbon dewatering screens to wash the pulp off the carbon. As previously mentioned, the screen underflow slurry will be sent back to the head of CIP No.1 and No.2 tanks while the screen oversize (carbon) will be sent to both an existing and new loaded carbon holding tank which will also require a new pump. The new loaded carbon holding tank will have a capacity to hold 12 st of carbon. When the elution columns are ready to be filled, the loaded carbon will be transferred to the elution columns and the stripping cycle will begin.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-4 |
|---|

Currently,
the carbon
stripping
circuit is
comprised of
two stripping
vessels, of
which only one
operates at
any given
time,
processing the
loaded carbon
from the CIP
and carbon in
column \(CIC\)
circuits.
While one
stripping
vessel
operates, the
other is being
filled with
loaded carbon
and vice
versa. The
stripping
temperature is
approximately
270˚F. The
stripping
vessel is
heated to the
desired
temperature
using barren
solution from
the
electrowinning
circuit as
eluate. The
eluate is
heated to the
target
temperature
using a 300
HP, 10 million
BTU/h,
oil-fired
heater.
When Manh Choh ore is being processed, to avoid excess accumulation of carbon, two stripping vessels must be used simultaneously. This means that the current heater must be able to provide enough energy to heat both stripping vessels to perform the required number of strips per day. To achieve the required temperature with two elution columns running simultaneously, a new boiler with two additional heat exchangers will be required. As such, each column will have its own dedicated boiler and heat exchangers. Modifications to the elution circuit include a new boiler with two pumps, a new hot water and surge tank with two new pumps, and two new plate and frame heat exchangers. Additional piping to existing lines will also be required to connect to the new heat exchangers and boiler/hot water surge tank.
| 14.1.3. | CYANIDE<br> DESTRUCTION |
|---|
The cyanide destruction circuit (Figure 14‑2) will consist of two tanks located between leach tank No. 6 (23-TK-006) and CIP tank No. 2 (23-TK-010) to treat cyanide tailings generated form the Manh Choh ore. The cyanide destruction circuit will use the SO2/air
process where
SO2
will be
generated
using sodium
metabisulfite
\(SMBS\) and
copper sulfate
as a catalyst
to oxidize and
thereby reduce
weak acid
dissociable
cyanide \(CNWAD\)
in the CIP
plant tailings
stream.
Discharge
from the last
CIP tank will
flow by
gravity into
the tailings
thickener feed
box along with
the addition
of process
water from the
reclaim water
pond to reduce
the feed
density to the
thickener from
the CIP tank
from 55% wt
solids to a
lower density.
The thickener
underflow will
then be pumped
to the carbon
safety screen
distributor
box which
feeds the
carbon safety
screens. To
improve water
recovery,
overflow
clarity and
underflow
densities, a
new feedwell
will be
installed. It
was also
recommended to
install an
auto dilution
system to
ensure proper
mixing of the
flocculent
with the
slurry.
Due to the reduced flow rate, a new thickener underflow pump will be required along with a new smaller 12 in. line. This will run from the thickener underflow cone to the safety screen distribution box. The screen undersize will feed into existing cyanide detox distributor box which will flow into detox tank feed pump box when processing Manh Choh ore. The detox tank feed pump will then pump the slurry to the detox tanks. Slurry will be pumped to the top of the tanks. The tanks will have the flexibility of operating either in series or in parallel with a bypass if required. SMBS and lime will be added to either one of the tanks or both if required. Water injection lines will be tied into the detox tank discharge line and introduced at the suction and discharge of the pump to ensure the line does not sand out. The discharge for the second tank will flow back to the tailings discharge pump box.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-5 |
|---|

The cyanide content of the incoming slurry is expected to be approximately 500 ppm of CNWAD. Cyanide destruction will be performed in the two tanks, using SMBS to generate sulfur dioxide, copper sulfate, and lime. The tanks will be sparged with air. Copper sulfate solution will be added as a catalyst for the reaction. The CNWAD concentration in the CN detox tailings is expected to be approximately 7 ppm. The acid formed during the cyanide destruction reaction will be neutralized with hydrated lime to maintain the pH in the desired range. Three new reagent pumps will be installed for the SMBS and two new reagent pumps for the copper sulfate 25-PP-704/705 along with a new mix tank and a holding tank for the copper sulfate. Copper sulfate is mixed to a density of 15% wt/wt while the SMBS is mixed to a density of 39% wt/vol.
The hydrated lime system mixes hydrated lime with water and will deliver milk of lime (lime slurry) to either or both cyanide destruction tank via two new pumps. Hydrated lime is consumed in the cyanide destruction process and is used to maintain the desired pH of the slurry. Lime is mixed to a solids density of 15% w/w.
The existing decommissioned air compressor will be replaced by a new compressor. The compressor will supply air to both the cyanide detox tanks and to a second air receiver that will be used for the new cyanide ISO Container mixing unit.
FIGURE 14‑2 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF CN DETOXIFICATION CIRCUIT

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-6 |
|---|

| 14.1.4. | ELECTRICAL |
|---|
The existing Fort Knox operation has sufficient power to supply the modified Fort Knox facility. The Mill Modification will need power distribution to the CN detoxification area and it is anticipated that one new e-house will be required.
There are no additional emergency backup generators included for the Project. The current site backup power plan will provide enough power to provide drain down pumping capacity in the event of a power outage.
| 14.1.5. | CONTROLS |
|---|
The Mill Modification will need controls for the new equipment which will be integrated into the existing distributed control system (DCS). As such, software modifications to the existing control system will be required.
Each piece of equipment will have a local control station mounted sufficiently close to the equipment to enable a convenient view of its operation. All electrical equipment will have Running/Not Running, Interlocked/Not Interlocked indications on the DCS. Equipment, where applicable, could be run locally or from the DCS system remotely. All electrical equipment will be fed from a motor control center (MCC).
Process
control will
be achieved by
a centralised
process
control system
\(PCS\). The
basic
requirements
for plant
control,
including:
| • | DCS |
|---|---|
| • | Drive<br> Starting |
| --- | --- |
| • | Instrumentation |
| --- | --- |
| • | Vendor<br> programmable<br> logic<br> controllers<br> (PLCs) |
| --- | --- |
It will be possible to start, stop, and control most equipment from either the DCS or a local control station. Some equipment packages will be controlled by dedicated vendor supplied PLCs. Operating information from these PLCs will be monitored by the DCS.
Some equipment, such as operating manual valves to switch to standby equipment and floor spillage pump operation, will not be controlled by the DCS.
There will be three modes of drive control or operation:
| • | Auto:<br> with drive<br> started by a<br> pre-set DCS<br> control |
|---|---|
| • | Manual:<br> with drive<br> started by the<br> operator via<br> DCS |
| --- | --- |
| • | Local:<br> with drive<br> started by the<br> operator via<br> local controls<br> (on being<br> enabled by the<br> DCS) |
| --- | --- |
Operation
in 'Remote'
mode will be
selected on
the
appropriate
local control
station.
Equipment will
then be
controlled
from the main
control room
via the DCS.
On changing
from 'local'
to 'remote'
mode, current
drive status
and controls
will remain
unchanged,
e.g., an
operating
variable-speed
drive will
remain
operating at
the speed
set-point
achieved when
changing from
'local' to
'remote' mode
and then
immediately be
subjected to
available
process
interlocks and
control loops.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-7 |
|---|

Software
interlocks
will be active
in 'Remote'
mode and
inactive in
'Local' mode
unless
specifically
described
otherwise. All
hardwired
interlocks
will be active
in both
'Remote' and
'Local' modes.
The Local Control mode will be used for maintenance purposes and local testing of individual drives and equipment. All drives will have local stop/start pushbuttons. 'Local Control' will be enabled by the operator via the DCS. In local mode, drives and equipment will be controlled via the local control station and not via the DCS. Wiring from the local control stations will be direct to the MCC.
Each drive will have the facility for a DCS start. When selected on the mimic screen, each drive will show a unique faceplate for that drive.
Sump pumps will utilize level control to automatically start/stop the pump unless specifically described otherwise.
Software
interlocks
will be
inactive in
'Local' mode
and active in
'Remote' mode
unless
specifically
described
otherwise. All
hardwired
interlocks
will be active
in both
'Remote' and
'Local' modes.
Interlocks
will be either
hard wired or
provided by
the DCS.
Hard-wired
\(local\)
interlocks
will be
installed for
equipment and
personnel
protection and
cannot be
overridden.
Hard-wired
interlocks
include motor
overloads,
conveyor pull
wires and
emergency stop
buttons.
Soft-wired
Interlocks
\(remote\),
configured in
the DCS, will
include
equipment
safety locks
and process
interlocks
installed to
stop equipment
upstream of a
unit which has
stopped.
| 14.1.6. | REAGENTS<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> COPPER SULFATE<br> AND SODIUM<br> METBISULFITE |
|---|
Granular
SMBS reagent
will be
delivered to
the site in
bulk bags \(1.1
st\). Batches
of 39% wt/vol
SMBS will be
made in the
SBMS mixing
tank by adding
a controlled
amount of raw
water. Mixed
batches will
be transferred
to the SBMS
storage tank
and
subsequently
dosed to the
CN detox
circuit. SMBS
will be added
to the first
\(and or
second\)
cyanide
destruction
tank to
provide the
source of SO2.
Three new SMBS
pumps will be
installed, two
operating with
one standby.
The reagent
addition rate
will be
controlled to
maintain an
ore feed
ratio. The
pumps will
operate via a
ring main with
the return
solution going
to the storage
tank.
Granular
copper sulfate
will be
delivered in
55 lb bags and
added to the
copper sulfate
mixing tank. A
controlled
volume of raw
water will be
added to the
mix tank to
obtain a
concentration
of 15 % w/w
copper sulfate
in solution. A
new copper
sulfate mix
tank and
agitator will
be required
along with a
new storage
tank. Addition
of the copper
sulfate will
be fed
directly to
pump box
cyanide detox
feed
distributor
due to the
proximity of
the
distributor.
Two new copper
sulfate
metering pumps
will be
required.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-8 |
|---|

WATER
Sources
of existing
fresh, fire,
potable, and
process water
remain
unchanged.
Additional
water will
come from the
TMF and be
added as
dilution water
to the
tailings
thickener feed
box, make up
water as
required, and
flush water on
the suction
and discharge
side of the
detox
discharge
pump.
CYANIDE
The cyanide concentration to the leach circuit will be 24% with a consumption rate of 4.1 lbs/st ore when processing Manh Choh ore. The existing feed pumps and line to the leach tanks will not change as the current system is adequate. However, the delivery and mixing of the cyanide due to the larger volumes of cyanide solution required will utilize an ISO Tank system. Cyanide will be brought to site in 20 ft ISO tank containers containing 20 st of solid, one inch sodium cyanide briquettes. In addition to the ISO tank, a storage tank will be required to circulate water from the ISO tank back to the storage tank. Caustic solution will be added to the mix tank, as per the current operating procedure, to prevent the formation of HCN gas.
The existing mix tank will be used as the storage tank for the dissolution process. Water requirement for the complete dissolution of the cyanide requires approximately 14,000 USg. The storage tank will be filled with the desired water quantity and continuously pumped to the ISO tank for approximately five hours at a rate of 47 USgpm (depending on the water temperature). Once it is believed that the cyanide is in solution, the pump is stopped, and air is applied to the ISO tank to purge the remaining solution to the storage tank. Once complete, approximately 264 USg of fresh water will be pumped to the one-inch inlet port on the ISO tank, then purged with air, a second 264 USg of water will be added, then purged with air, followed by a final third flush and air purge. Once the last purge is completed, if no pressure is remaining in the ISO tank, then the hose connections can be safely removed. Once the required solution strength is achieved and the dissolution of cyanide complete, the solution is transferred from the mix tank to the cyanide storage tank. A new additional pump to transfer solution from the mix tank to the ISO tank will be required. The projected cyanide consumption per year is provided in Table 14‑1.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-9 |
|---|

TABLE
14‑1 CYANIDE
CONSUMPTION
ST/YEAR
| Years | st/year | lb/st<br> ore |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 606 | 1.32 |
| 2025 | 1,198 | 2.18 |
| 2026 | 2,137 | 3.90 |
| 2027 | 2,698 | 4.93 |
| 2028 | 242 | 3.75 |
| Annual<br><br> <br>Average | 3.17 |
LIME
Hydrated
lime will be
added to the
SAG mill feed
conveyor and
to the CN
detox tanks.
The
consumption
rate of lime
at the
grinding
circuit is 103
st/day and for
the CN detox
circuit 12.2
st/day. The
current lime
silo located
adjacent to
the SAG mill
feed conveyor
has a total
storage
capacity of
180 st,
therefore, no
modifications
are required.
A new hydrated
lime silo with
a capacity of
100 st and
mixing system
will be
required for
the CN detox
area. The lime
will be mixed
with raw water
to generate
milk of lime
slurry with a
solution
strength of
15% wt. The
Lime vendor
package will
contain a lime
mix tank with
an agitator, a
lime storage
tank with an
agitator, two
transfer
pumps, and two
hydrated lime
distribution
pumps. One of
two available
fixed speed
pumps will
deliver lime
slurry to
either of the
detox tanks
via a ring
main with the
excess being
continuously
returned to
either the mix
tank or
storage tank.
This
continuous
pumping of
lime slurry
from the
agitated tank
is to prevent
settling of
the solids in
the pipeline.
The hydrated
lime silo will
be equipped
with a dust
collector. The
lime slurry
will be added
to either of
the cyanide
detox tanks
using
automated
control vales
to modify and
maintain the
pH.
CARBON
Carbon
will be
processed in
the existing
absorption
\(CIP\) and
desorption
\(Elution\)
facility.
Loaded carbon
will be pumped
from both CIP
tanks No. 1
and No. 2 to
two new loaded
carbon
dewatering
screens. The
screen
oversize will
then flow to
an existing
loaded carbon
holding tank
which will
further pump
the carbon to
a new carbon
holding tank
to deal with
the increased
amount of
carbon
generated when
processing
Manh Choh ore.
The screen
undersize will
be pumped back
to the CIP
tanks No.1 and
No. 2. The
amount of
loaded carbon
transferred
each day from
the CIP
circuit will
be 38 st. The
carbon
concentration
within the CIP
tanks is
assumed to
remain the
same as the
processing of
Fort Knox ore,
at 10 g/L to
17 g/L.
CEMENT
A new 100 st cement silo will be required and will be located near the existing Lime silo adjacent to the SAG mill feed conveyor. The cement silo will be equipped with a dust collector and will screw feed onto the conveyor belt prior to the ore entering the SAG mill.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-10 |
|---|

| 14.2. | PROCESSING<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> PRODUCTION<br> SEQUENCE AND<br> SCHEDULES |
|---|
Starting
in the second
half of 2024
to the
beginning of
2028, a total
of 4.3 million
st of Manh
Choh ore is
expected to be
transported to
the Fort Knox
mineral
processing
facility.
Approximately
900 koz of
gold \(90.3%
LOM recovery\)
will be
produced. Gold
is recovered
by gravity
concentration
and CIP
process. The
gold
production
schedule is
presented in
Table 14‑2.
During the
third quarter
of the Manh
Choh ore
processing
campaign in
2024, the gold
and silver
recoveries are
reduced by 5%
to account for
processing
ramp-up.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-11 |
|---|

TABLE 14‑2 LOM PRODUCTION AND METAL RECOVERY
| 2024<br><br> <br>Q1 | 2024<br><br> <br>Q2 | 2024<br><br> <br>Q3 | 2024<br><br> <br>Q4 | 2025<br><br> <br>Q1 | 2025<br><br> <br>Q2 | 2025<br><br> <br>Q3 | 2025<br><br> <br>Q4 | 2026<br><br> <br>Q1 | 2026<br><br> <br>Q2 | 2026<br><br> <br>Q3 | 2026<br><br> <br>Q4 | 2027<br><br> <br>Q1 | 2027<br><br> <br>Q2 | 2027<br><br> <br>Q3 | 2027<br><br> <br>Q4 | 2028 <br><br> Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tons<br> Transported | - | - | 164 | 218 | 300 | 357 | 369 | 610 | 270 | 273 | 276 | 276 | 270 | 273 | 276 | 276 | 129 |
| Au<br> Grade, oz/st | - | - | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Contained<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Au, koz | - | - | 56.1 | 67.1 | 91.5 | 69.3 | 65.6 | 120.3 | 39.3 | 43.6 | 56.1 | 102.0 | 87.8 | 79.2 | 70.6 | 33.0 | 15.4 |
| Recovered<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Au, koz | - | - | 49.5 | 62.6 | 85.5 | 64.7 | 61.3 | 112.3 | 35.8 | 40.1 | 51.0 | 87.9 | 74.1 | 68.5 | 63.1 | 29.6 | 13.9 |
| Ag<br> Grade, oz/st | - | - | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Contained<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Ag, koz | - | - | 63.6 | 66.1 | 107.6 | 136.2 | 231.2 | 330.0 | 54.9 | 69.0 | 45.6 | 145.7 | 133.5 | 100.2 | 91.5 | 97.4 | 45.6 |
| Recovered<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Ag, koz | - | - | 43.6 | 48.7 | 78.9 | 97.1 | 170.2 | 239.6 | 33.0 | 39.9 | 27.1 | 107.2 | 93.0 | 66.9 | 59.4 | 57.7 | 27.0 |
Note. The schedule start date is derived from the FS.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 14-12 |
|---|

| 15. | INFRASTRUCTURE |
|---|---|
| 15.1. | PLANNED<br> INFRASTRUCTURE |
| --- | --- |
To support Project activities at the Manh Choh mine site, the following new or upgraded infrastructure is planned:
| • | Construct<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> a new “Twin<br> Road” parallel<br> to the<br> existing<br> Tetlin Village<br> Access (TVA)<br> Road to<br> facilitate ore<br> haulage with<br> highway<br> trucks. |
|---|---|
| • | A new<br> Manh Choh Mine<br> Access (MCMA)<br> Road from the<br> TVA Road to<br> the mine site,<br> including<br> several<br> material<br> laydown areas<br> along the<br> route. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A new<br> highway truck<br> ore load-out<br> facility,<br> including<br> infrastructure<br> for<br> maintenance,<br> truck scale<br> operations,<br> administrative<br> functions, and<br> associated<br> waste and<br> water<br> management<br> facilities. |
| --- | --- |
| • | North<br> Waste Rock<br> Dump (WRD),<br> North Pit WRD,<br> Main WRD,<br> Overburden and<br> Wet<br> Stockpiles,<br> and Marginal<br> Low-Grade Ore<br> (LGO)<br> Stockpile Pad. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A new<br> Mine<br> Infrastructure<br> Site,<br> including mine<br> offices, mine<br> maintenance<br> facilities,<br> warehousing<br> facilities, a<br> water<br> treatment<br> plant, and<br> emergency<br> response<br> infrastructure. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Facilities<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> for<br> re-fuelling,<br> explosives<br> storage and<br> handling, and<br> sewerage. |
| --- | --- |
| • | New<br> laydown areas,<br> upgraded<br> off-site<br> accommodation<br> facilities,<br> and general<br> buildings. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Primary<br> mine site<br> power supply<br> consisting of<br> enclosed<br> diesel<br> generators and<br> switchgear<br> with<br> three-phase<br> power<br> distribution<br> via on-surface<br> and<br> underground<br> cable runs. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Process<br> controls for<br> water and<br> wastewater<br> management,<br> mine<br> dewatering<br> pumps,<br> building<br> systems, and<br> equipment<br> washdown. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Communications<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> infrastructure<br> for<br> facilities,<br> administration,<br> mine<br> operations and<br> mine<br> maintenance<br> activities,<br> and<br> environmental<br> monitoring. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Surface<br> water<br> diversion<br> channels and<br> water<br> treatment and<br> retention<br> facilities. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Two<br> additional<br> water supply<br> wells will be<br> installed to<br> ensure<br> sufficient<br> water is<br> available to<br> manage dust.<br> The first<br> additional<br> well will be<br> in the<br> vicinity of<br> the pits, with<br> the second to<br> be drilled<br> close to the<br> access road<br> near the<br> Alaska<br> Highway. <br> Potable<br> drinking water<br> will be<br> available at<br> fill stations<br> at the<br> upgraded<br> accommodations<br> complex in Tok<br> and will be<br> delivered from<br> the complex to<br> the mine site<br> offices. |
| --- | --- |
To support Project activities at Fort Knox, the following new or upgraded infrastructure is planned:
| • | Northeast<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> of the<br> existing<br> process plant<br> footprint: |
|---|---|
| o | A new<br> access road. |
| --- | --- |
| o | A new<br> Manh Choh<br> coarse ore<br> stockpile. |
| --- | --- |
| o | A new<br> surface water<br> collection and<br> management<br> facility and<br> associated<br> pipelines. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-1 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Process<br> plant<br> modifications<br> (refer to<br> Sections 10<br> and 14). |
|---|---|
| • | Tailings<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> from Manh Choh<br> ore deposited<br> in the mined<br> out Fort Knox<br> open pit. |
| --- | --- |
Figure
15-1 shows the
proposed
Project
infrastructure
at Manh Choh
and Figure
15-2 shows
infrastructure
at Fort Knox.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-2 |
|---|

FIGURE 15‑1 SITE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT – MANH CHOH

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-3 |
|---|

FIGURE
15‑2 SITE
GENERAL
ARRANGEMENT –
FORT KNOX

Source: Bantrel, 2022
Note. Not to Scale
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-4 |
|---|

| 15.2. | MINE<br> SITE ROADS |
|---|
Site access roads will be constructed to accommodate 10‑ft-wide, highway heavy haul vehicles (118 ft length A-trains) and have been designed for a double-lane roadway top width of 30 ft. Ore from the mine site will be trucked along two main road segments to Alaska Highway 2 and on to
| 15.2.1. | TWIN<br> ROAD AND<br> TETLIN VILLAGE<br> ACCESS (TVA)<br> ROAD |
|---|
The Twin Road will be constructed to allow highway ore haul trucks to cross approximately five miles of lowland area between Alaska Highway 2 and the base of the Tetlin Hills. The Twin Road will parallel the TVA Road and keep local village traffic separate from ore haul traffic. The chosen road alignment separates ore haul traffic from Tetlin Village traffic while avoiding residential areas, existing utilities, and wetlands as much as possible.
Road construction material will be sourced from alluvial material mined from borrow pits along the route (flatlands). A minimum of 24 inches of structural fill will be added to create embankments and raise the driving surface above the anticipated flood elevation. Cross-culverts will be installed at key locations and existing culvert placements will be upgraded.
| 15.2.2. | MANH<br> CHOH MINE<br> ACCESS (MCMA)<br> ROAD |
|---|
From the Twin Road segment, the route will connect with the Manh Choh Mine Access (MCMA) Road which turns west and climbs the Tetlin Hills for approximately six miles. The MCMA Road traverses along the ridgetop for another six miles to the mine site and the MCN and MCS mining areas (Figure 15‑3). The MCMA Road alignment and profile have been developed to optimize cut and fill requirements. Mine site development rock will be used to construct most of the first 1.5 miles of the MCMA Road, starting from the mine site, with the remaining road materials sourced from cut sections and re-distributed to fill sections. Road segments located in flatlands will be sourced from alluvial material mined from borrow pits along the route.
The MCMA Road will include cross-culverts or other appropriate drainage structures installed at surface water crossings. To minimize blockages, culverts will be a minimum of 24 inches to 36 inches in diameter (depending on culvert length) and will be located based on drainage analysis. Aufeis channel drains will be installed to mitigate ice build-up on the road surface and additional drains will be installed if groundwater seeps are detected within the face of any cut section.
| 15.2.3. | MINE<br> SITE ROADS |
|---|
Mine site roads will be constructed in a manner similar to the construction of the TVA and MCMA roads. Wherever possible, surface water will be encouraged to follow natural drainages and care will be taken during detailed design and construction to minimize impacts to existing water courses.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-5 |
|---|

FIGURE 15‑3 MINE ACCESS ROAD

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-6 |
|---|

| 15.2.4. | DUST<br> SUPPRESSION |
|---|
In most months, there will be a shortage of water for dust control. Dust will be controlled by surfacing roads with igneous material crushed near the mine and application of dust suppression water sourced from either Well #2 or from brine disposal. Well water will be applied to dust generating areas when temperatures are favorable. Application of calcium chloride dust suppressant will be considered to lower dust suppression water requirements in the dry season. As there is a lack of water at and around the elevation of the mine site, treated surface run-off water will be used for dust control on the MCMA Road.
| 15.3. | MINE<br> SITE BUILDINGS |
|---|---|
| 15.3.1. | GENERAL<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> BUILDINGS |
| --- | --- |
Modular
building units
will be
constructed at
a
manufacturing
facility and
transported to
the Project
area via the
Alaska highway
system and
Project access
roads.
| 15.3.2. | MINE<br> SITE SERVICES<br> AND<br> ADMINISTRATION<br> BUILDINGS |
|---|
PROJECT ACCESS CONTROL
The Mine Site Gatehouse building will be a re-purposed cabin from the recently purchased Westmark Hotel property and will be located beside the intersection of Alaska Highway 2 and the TVA Road. A delivery laydown area will be constructed adjacent to the building to facilitate management of deliveries to the mine site. The building will be occupied by security personnel to control deliveries and access to the Project area. The Mine Site Gatehouse will not require plumbing and will be heated with electric wall heaters or a stand-alone oil heater.
ORE STORAGE AND LOAD-OUT
The ore storage and load-out area will include an uncovered 30 ft x 110 ft x 23 ft weigh scale. Scale construction will include a cast-in-place concrete pit, steel plate ramps, and gravel approaches.
The ore storage area (stockpiles) will be created atop a thick NAG waste pad and an unlined gravel pad constructed from cut and fill of local topography. Surface run-off water will be contained by a perimeter ditch. Where required, truck dumping will occur in lifts and allow loading from the toe of stockpiles with front-end loaders.
A fabric structure will be erected by the ore haulage contractor at the ore storage and load-out area. The foundation will be constructed by the Project. The structure will provide an enclosed, heated zone for highway trucks.
MINE ADMINISTRATION AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
The Mine Administration and Technical Services Building will be a single story, 36 ft x 60 ft, modular structure located within the footprint of the Mine Infrastructure Site. The building will serve as the main mine site office, housing approximately 10 personnel directly involved in overseeing mining and related activities. Building construction will involve three modular units complexed together with a “water car” unit that houses potable water and wastewater tanks for the facility. The complex will have electricity, indoor plumbing, and telecommunication
connections.
An electrical
heating source
will be
provided to
help maintain
a balanced
electrical
load on the
facility
generators.
The complex
will include
private office
spaces, common
office work
area,
kitchenette,
storage room,
utility room,
washrooms, and
a
radio/technology
room.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-7 |
|---|

MINE MAINTENANCE, WAREHOUSING, AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Located
with the
footprint of
the Mine
Infrastructure
Site and
adjacent to
the mine site
ore
stockpiles,
this building
is intended to
be used as the
primary mine
site
maintenance
facility. The
building is
sized to
facilitate
multiple
functions and
includes:
| • | Four<br> general<br> maintenance<br> bays, one<br> equipment<br> wash/storage<br> bay, and<br> meeting space<br> for mine<br> maintenance<br> personnel. |
|---|---|
| • | A<br> soft-wall-style<br> warehouse<br> structure with<br> approximately<br> 10,000 ft^2^<br> of heated<br> storage space<br> and 13,000 ft^2^<br> of cold<br> storage space. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Warehouse<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> laydown yard<br> (approximately<br> 130,000 ft^2^). |
| --- | --- |
| • | One<br> emergency<br> response bay. |
| --- | --- |
| • | General<br> storage and<br> utilities<br> space. |
| --- | --- |
This multi-function building will be connected to mine site electrical reticulation with power adequate for operating maintenance equipment such as air compressors, welders, and other tools. The building will be ventilated and with large overhead fans and a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. Primary heating will be from a radiant (concrete) floor heating system using heating oil or diesel-fired equipment.
The building and associated external infrastructure (e.g., power generation equipment, storage tanks) will be located outside the blast radius and respect minimum required offsets from explosives storage facilities.
EXPLOSIVES
STORAGE
Requirements
for the
storage and
handling of
blasting
agents,
high-explosives,
and blasting
accessories
will adhere to
the
requirements
of 27 CFR 555,
MSHA, and
Bureau of
Alcohol,
Tobacco,
Firearms and
Explosives
\(BATFE\)
regulations.
The layouts for explosive magazines and storage silos are based on designs implemented at Kinross’ Fort Knox operations. An area southwest of the Mine Infrastructure Site footprint has been selected for siting of the facilities. Final facility locations and designs will be coordinated with the explosives and blasting service provider.
FUEL FACILITIES
Fuel facilities will be installed in the following Project locations:
| • | Mine<br> Infrastructure<br> Site – two,<br> 30,000 US gal<br> diesel tanks<br> and one 5,000<br> US gal<br> gasoline tank. |
|---|---|
| • | Ore<br> Storage and<br> Load-out Area<br> – fuel tanks<br> and<br> re-fuelling<br> station to be<br> finalized and<br> supplied by<br> the ore<br> haulage<br> contractor. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-8 |
| --- | --- |

All fuel storage tanks will be above ground, double-wall steel tanks, manufactured to meet Steel Tank Institute (STI) F921 construction specifications. All fuel facility locations will include installation of a tertiary containment geo-membrane.
Dispensing
and electronic
fuel
management
systems are
included with
the fuel
facilities.
The facilities
will be
manufactured
as modular
systems and
mounted on
skids. During
construction,
bollards or
large boulders
may be added
to increase
physical
protection.
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
The mine site water treatment plant (WTP) will be a modular-style system constructed within the Mine Infrastructure Site footprint. The WTP will be a surplus unit sourced from Fort Knox (Titan 90 system) and will require seasonal removal of water and shutdown to prevent freeze-up problems. The facility includes a series of pumps, settling and mixing tanks, micro and reverse osmosis filtration, and electronic monitoring equipment to treat mine surface run-off water. WTP consumables will be stored in steel shipping containers and electricity will be supplied by the mine site power generating system. The WTP is planned to be in use for the duration of the Project life, or approximately five years.
| 15.3.1. | ACCOMMODATION<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> FACILITIES |
|---|
The former Westmark Hotel in Tok will be upgraded to accommodate the planned workforce. Upgraded accommodations will house a total of 176 workers after completion of a 100-room, modular-style expansion. The expansion of the facility includes kitchen and dining facilities, recreation and gym facilities, and a maintenance shop.
| 15.4. | MINE<br> SITE UTILITIES |
|---|---|
| 15.4.1. | POWER<br> SUPPLY AND<br> DISTRIBUTION |
| --- | --- |
AP&T
is the
power/telecom
utility
servicing the
nearby
community of
Tok. AP&T
and will
supply grid
power from a
diesel-fired
generation
plant to the
accommodation
facilities at
the former
Westmark
Hotel.
AP&T
cannot meet
mine site
power needs
due to a power
distribution
capacity limit
of 1 MW along
the TVA Road
and the high
cost of
upgrading
existing and
extending new
power
distribution
lines.
Primary mine
site power
will thus be
supplied from
on-site,
diesel-fired
generators.
MINE SITE GATEHOUSE
A large electrical load is not anticipated at the Mine Site Gatehouse. The building will be powered by a diesel-fired generator.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-9 |
|---|

ORE STORAGE AND LOAD-OUT
The ore storage and load-out facility will be powered by a diesel-fired generator systems supplied by the ore haulage contractor.
MINE SITE
Power for all mine site facilities will be supplied from the Mine Prime Power Generator System (MPPGS) consisting of diesel-fired generators in arctic-grade, skid-mounted enclosures connected to a switchgear enclosure that controls the generators. The MPPGS and related infrastructure will include:
| • | A<br> prepared site<br> pad, including<br> a grounding<br> electrode grid<br> with extents<br> bounding the<br> complete<br> installation. |
|---|---|
| • | A<br> minimum of<br> three<br> generator<br> enclosures. <br> Each enclosure<br> will<br> incorporate a<br> generator set<br> with fuel<br> tank, a diesel<br> exhaust fluid<br> (DEF) tank,<br> and the<br> auxiliary<br> infrastructure<br> required to<br> make each<br> assembly<br> operate in a<br> stand-alone<br> fashion if<br> required. |
| --- | --- |
| • | One<br> switchgear<br> enclosure that<br> houses the<br> generator<br> paralleling<br> switchgear<br> with system<br> controls and<br> includes a<br> distribution<br> section with<br> circuit<br> breakers that<br> supply<br> underground<br> distribution<br> feeders to the<br> mine site<br> facilities and<br> equipment. |
| --- | --- |
| • | An<br> auxiliary<br> enclosure for<br> DEF storage<br> with equipment<br> and piping for<br> automatic<br> transfer of<br> DEF to the<br> generator<br> enclosures. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Generator<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> fuel storage<br> tanks with<br> piping and<br> related<br> equipment for<br> automatic<br> transfer to<br> the generator<br> enclosures. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> skid-mounted,<br> step-up<br> transformer<br> that steps up<br> the<br> three-phase,<br> 480 V<br> generator<br> system power<br> to 4,160 V to<br> supply remote<br> dewatering and<br> water<br> management<br> pumps. |
| --- | --- |
Three-phase
power will be
distributed to
the various
mine site
facilities
through an
underground
cable system
at 480/277 V.
Each facility
serviced will
have a
dedicated
disconnect to
allow
disconnection
of individual
facilities
without
disturbing
other
facilities.
The electrical load profile will vary seasonally with an estimated maximum of 250 kW during the winter months to a maximum of approximately 900 kW during/after a peak rain event.
MINE SITE BACK-UP POWER
Given the importance of the facilities within the footprint of the Mine Infrastructure Site, two 5,000 kW, diesel-fired generators will be installed near the Mine Administration and Technical Services building (adjacent to critical communications equipment). The back-up generator will start automatically on loss of power in the MPPGS and will support life-safety loads, communications, critical outdoor lighting, and equipment deemed critical to mine site functions.
MINE SITE POWER DISTRIBUTION
Power distribution will be predominately via underground cable runs routed through heavy-wall HDPE piping. Power cable runs will be jacketed Type MC-TEK90, including branches to equipment such as wells, out-buildings, fuel pumping and dispensing, and distribution equipment for site lighting and parking lots equipped with head bolt heater outlets. Surface cable runs will be completed where the exposed cable is not subject to damage.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-10 |
|---|

| 15.4.2. | LIGHTING |
|---|
GENERAL
To effectively manage operating costs associated with lighting requirements, where practical, all Project lighting will be of the Light Emitting Diode (LED) type.
Facility
locations with
indoor
operations
24 hours per
day will
require
continuous
lighting.
Indoor
operations
that follow a
predictable
schedule may
incorporate
time-based
control with
occupancy
detection
over-ride.
Outdoor
lighting will
be largely
photo-electrically
controlled
with
motion/infrared
controls where
appropriate.
ROADWAYS
Roadway
lighting
applies to
fixed lighting
along roadways
to enhance
productivity
and safety.
This lighting
is expected to
largely be
pole-mounted
with aerial
cabling
supplying
power. Poles
will be sited
close to roads
behind berms
or barriers or
positioned
where impact
from equipment
and vehicles
is not
likely.
Generally,
sharp-cut-off
fixtures with
integral
photoelectric
control will
be used.
MINING OPERATIONS
Lighting
for mining
operations
will be
equipment-mounted,
fixed \(e.g.,
long-term
roadways\), or
temporary in
nature. Where
required,
fixed and
mobile
equipment
lighting will
be
supplemented
with portable,
diesel-fired
floodlight
towers.
| 15.4.3. | PROCESS<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> CONTROLS |
|---|
Apart from controls and monitoring related to mine dewatering pumps, process controls are expected to be limited to packaged equipment with a specific function (e.g., reverse osmosis water treatment, building systems, and equipment for washdown, wastewater management, and building systems). As there are no mineral processing facilities at the Manh Choh mine site, complex process systems are not expected.
| 15.4.4. | COMMUNICATIONS |
|---|
The Project requires telecommunication and internet services infrastructure for facilities, administration, mining operation and management, environmental and process control/monitoring, geo-positioning
support,
equipment
operation and
maintenance,
and support
for mine radio
communications.
MINE SITE GATEHOUSE
The Mine Gatehouse telecommunication
needs will be
served with
public
cellular
telephone/data
service, or
mine
radio/microwave
service
compatible
with any
device that
may be brought
to the
facility.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-11 |
|---|

MINE SITE
Mine site facilities with data requirements will be a minimum of Category 5E standard for both data and telephone communications.
A communications server will be located at the Westmark Hotel accommodations complex and will support telecommunications infrastructure to mine site users. At the server, a switch will support a fiber optic cable connection to a “facility switch” at each mine facility requiring telecommunications services. Other remote facilities will use a wireless Ethernet or microwave link rather than cable.
Outdoor
cabled
telecommunications
infrastructure
will be
physically
routed through
separate
raceways
similar to the
outdoor Power
Feeder
Distribution
cabling.
Wireless links
will be placed
and oriented
to obtain
required
performance
and
reliability.
Wireless
repeaters and
redundant
links will be
provided where
increased
reliability
justifies the
cost and
complexity.
Fiber optic cable will be extended to applicable site facilities and required fiber optic connections will be made with KGMA’s communications tower. Wi-Fi equipment will be installed and tied into fiber optic connections as required. Mine site contractors will install their own communications equipment in the buildings/facilities they occupy.
Mine facilities without data or telephone requirements will be served with cellular telephone/data service, or mine radio service compatible with any device that brought to the facility.
MINE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
The mine radio is an industrial system configured and intended for mining use, largely supporting operational and emergency audible/voice communications at all facilities from the camp to all portions of the mine. The mine radio system is a separate system of equipment, cabling, repeaters, and wireless links that are fully functional with, or without the telecommunications infrastructure described above.
ACCOMMODATIONS
The refurbished Westmark Hotel and modular expansion complex will have telecommunication and internet services provided by connections supplied by AP&T.
| 15.4.5. | WATER<br> SUPPLY |
|---|
POTABLE WATER
Potable
water supply
for the
refurbished
Westmark Hotel
will be from
an existing
110 gpm well.
This flow rate
is expected to
be adequate
for the number
of personnel
that will be
housed at this
location \(100\)
and will also
support an
additional 76
personnel that
are planned to
be housed in
new modular
accommodations
to be
constructed on
the property.
Potable
drinking water
will be
available at
fill stations
at the
upgraded
accommodations
complex in Tok
and will be
brought from
the complex to
the mine site
offices.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-12 |
|---|

PROCESS WATER
At the mine site, Well #2 will be used for supplementary dust suppression and equipment wash water when the surface water collected is insufficient to meet site needs. Well #2 is projected to produce an average of 20 gpm, so two additional wells will be installed to ensure sufficient water is available to manage dust. The first additional well will be in the vicinity of the open pits, with the second well to be drilled close to the access road near the Alaska Highway.
The wash bay at the mine site will use treated surface water. Miscellaneous process water for the various maintenance and administrative facilities is anticipated to be distributed via water truck.
| 15.4.6. | WATER<br> STORAGE AND<br> DISTRIBUTION |
|---|
An indoor, heated water storage tank has been installed at the mine site for fire suppression.
WATER AND RECYCLE WATER SYSTEMS
Surface
water run-off
adjacent to
mining areas
will be
captured in
pit perimeter
ditches. The
Mine Site
Perimeter
Ditch will be
sized to
handle the
100-year post
operational
flow. Lined
retention
basins will be
constructed to
provide
storage for
10-year storm
events with
overflows to
the open pits
to contain
events larger
than the
10-year event.
The treatment system and conveyance piping to the WTP are sized to treat emergency situations over a two-week period (200 gpm). Insulated 4-inch or 6-inch HDPE piping will be installed aboveground except at road crossings. There will be pumps installed in the retention basins to provide flow between those points and the WTP (minimum 31 hp pump in East Retention Basin and minimum 11 hp pump in West Retention Basin).
Mine water from dewatering of the open pits will be sent to the Untreated Water Storage Pond for use in dust control or for filling the MCS Pit with water as it is being reclaimed.
During
the MCN Pit
and MCS Pit
backfilling
and
reclamation
phases,
approximately
200 gpm of
water will be
required fill
the pits to
reduce the
oxidation
processes
expected to
occur within
placed waste
rock. To
satisfy in-pit
water
requirements,
mine site Well
#2 will be
tested, its
well casing
lengthened,
and will feed
water into the
untreated
water
collection
pond.
| 15.4.7. | SEWERAGE |
|---|
The Mine Gatehouse will connect to a conventional septic and leach field system that has adequate separation for source water protection (minimum 200 ft). The guard shack at the mine access road will have a portable washroom facility that can be serviced on a routine basis by a service provider out of Tok. Facilities at the Mine Infrastructure Site will include sewage holding tanks that can be serviced on a routine basis by service providers out of Tok.
Sewage
treatment for
the
refurbished
Westmark Hotel
consists of
two separate
systems. The
restaurant/lodge
and the
two-story
units are
supported by a
10,000 US gal
septic tank,
combined with
about 2,250 ft^2^
of leach
field. The
single-story
units are
supported by a
4,000 US gal
septic tank,
combined with
about 3,200 ft^2^
of leach
field.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-13 |
|---|

| 15.4.8. | FIRE<br> SYSTEMS |
|---|
With the exception of the upgraded Westmark Hotel accommodations complex, Project facilities and major maintenance areas will not have fixed/building fire suppression systems installed, rather fire suppression controls in these areas will consist of those systems already on-board mobile equipment and portable fire extinguishers.
Fire
extinguishers
will be
located on the
mine site
according to
local/state
regulations.
| 15.4.9. | COMPRESSED<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> AIR SYSTEMS |
|---|
Fixed and mobile compressed air systems will be required to support mine maintenance activities. The mining contractor will be responsible for supplying and maintaining the required systems as part of executing the mining contract.
| 15.4.10. | MINE<br> SITE AND PIT<br> PERIMETER<br> DITCHES |
|---|
The Mine Site Perimeter Ditch is sized for a 100-year storm event, with 0.5 ft of freeboard, and a grade of 1% (typical). A 12-ft-wide access road will be constructed adjacent to and along the entire length of the Mine Site Perimeter Ditch and will be lined within 500 ft of wetlands. Surface water run-off adjacent to mining areas will be intercepted in pit perimeter ditches.
| 15.4.1. | RETENTION<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> BASINS |
|---|
Three retention (settling) basins (one for each of the west, southeast, and northeast ditches) are sized for a 10-year storm event and have a nominal depth of 10 ft. The southeast and northeast basins have overflow weirs toward the MCN Pit. The West Basin overflow weir will permit flow into the MCN Pit once mining has progressed below the elevation of the basin. A 12-ft-wide access road will be constructed adjacent to and along the basin perimeters. All retention basins will be lined as they are all within 500 ft of wetlands.
| 15.4.1. | WATER<br> TREATMENT<br> PLANT |
|---|
Water treatment will be minimized using water collected in the retention basins for dust suppression. In case of emergency, or if freeboard is depleted, a Titan 90 water plant can be relocated from Fort Knox and installed at Manh Choh. The water plant can treat approximately 200 gpm to remove sediment.
| 15.4.1. | RETENTION<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> BASIN PUMPING<br> AND PIT<br> DEWATERING |
|---|
Electric
pumps will
transfer water
collected in
the West
Retention
Basin to the
Main WRD
perimeter
ditch and the
MCS Pit at a
pumping rate
of
approximately
350 gpm.
To ensure on-going sufficient capacity is available between storm events, a pumping rate of approximately 1,000 gpm is required from the Southeast Retention Basin to the Northeast Retention Basin to the storage basin adjacent to the Water Treatment Plant.
Pit dewatering wells are sized to pump 100 gpm (MCN Pit) and 150 gpm (MCS Pit) and are oversized to handle rain events.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-14 |
|---|

| 15.5. | MINE<br> SITE WASTE<br> DISPOSAL |
|---|
Waste receptacles will be placed at appropriate waste generation and collection points around the mine site. A service provider out of Tok will remove receptacles for off site disposal.
Sanitary
wastewater
will be
collected
using a
septic/wastewater
collection
contractor.
| 15.6. | FORT<br> KNOX<br> INFRASTRUCTURE |
|---|---|
| • | Process<br> plant<br> modifications<br> (as described<br> in Sections 10<br> and 14). |
| --- | --- |
| • | A new<br> Manh Choh<br> coarse ore<br> stockpile. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A new<br> surface water<br> collection and<br> management<br> facility and<br> associated<br> pipelines. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Tailings<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> from Manh Choh<br> ore deposited<br> in the mined<br> out Fort Knox<br> open pit. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 15-15 |
| --- | --- |

| 16. | MARKET<br> STUDIES |
|---|
The doré bars produced by Manh Choh will be comprised of approximately 45% to 55% gold and 40% to 50% silver. Approximately 5% of substantially non-deleterious
impurities is
expected in
the doré bars
but is not
anticipated to
have a
material
adverse effect
on payment
terms to
refiners. A
transportation
contractor
will transport
the doré bars
from Fort Knox
to one or more
refineries
with which
Kinross has
existing
business
relationships.
It is expected
that the
potential
refineries
will have
sufficient
capacity to
accept the
material.
The refiner is responsible for producing gold and silver bars that satisfy the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) good-delivery standards. To satisfy these standards, the refiner must comply with LBMA regulations and operating practices. If the refiner under contract fails to meet these standards, it is possible to engage a new refiner in a reasonable time frame.
The refineries will electronically transfer the gold and silver ounces contained in the bars that meet good-delivery standards to unallocated accounts held by Peak Gold. Such credited gold and silver ounces will then be apportioned by ownership (70% to KGMA and 30% to Contango) and sold at the applicable spot price to KGMA and Contango. Using business relationships developed with several international banks, KGMA and Contango are responsible for selling their portion of the refined gold and silver externally at prevailing market prices.
| 16.1. | PRODUCT<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> SPECIFICATION |
|---|
Manh Choh will produce doré bars with a metal content of approximately 45% to 55% gold and 40% to 50% silver, with the balance being various non-deleterious elements totaling approximately 5%. The doré will be shipped to one or more refiners for refining into LBMA good-delivery gold and silver bars.
The presence of deleterious elements can have a significant impact on the pricing and availability of refining services and, in severe cases, prevent the refiners from accepting the product for processing. This impact depends on the nature and quantity of deleterious elements found in the doré. Based on recent metallurgical testing programs, deleterious elements are not foreseen to be a concern for the Project (see Section 10 for more details).
| 16.2. | DEMAND<br> AND SUPPLY<br> FORECASTS |
|---|
The principal commodity for the Project is gold, which is freely traded, at prices that are widely known. In the opinion of the QP, the prospects for the sale of gold production are virtually assured.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 16-1 |
|---|

| 16.3. | MARKETING<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> STRATEGY |
|---|---|
| 16.3.1. | SINGLE<br> VERSUS<br> MULTIPLE<br> REFINERIES |
| --- | --- |
Third party refiners should have sufficient excess capacity to process the material generated at Manh Choh. However, this capacity can become restricted when third parties send large, unpredictable volumes of metals to the refinery. Depending on the amount of metal produced at Manh Choh, KGMA as manager of the Peak Gold will determine whether the doré will be sent to multiple refineries, or just one refinery. By sending the metal to more than one refinery, Manh Choh spreads refiner credit risk and mitigates operational risks (e.g., shutdowns, strikes, and logistical issues).
Global
refinery
capacity
constraints
are not
expected to be
a concern.
| 16.3.2. | REFINERY<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> PRICING |
|---|
Refinery
pricing is
estimated to
be set as
described
below,
assuming that
the doré
composition as
described in
Section 16.1
is correct. If
the doré
composition
materially
differs from
this
assumption,
refining terms
can change
significantly.
Refining
contracts are
usually for
two to three
years, and can
be extended or
cancelled upon
30 days’
notice.
Refinery
pricing is
estimated to
be as follows:
| • | Treatment<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and refining<br> charge: | $0.40<br> per ounce of<br> doré |
|---|---|---|
| • | Metal<br> return: | 99.975%<br> for gold and<br> 99.50% for<br> silver |
| • | Extra<br> charges apply<br> to deleterious<br> elements (not<br> expected to<br> materially<br> impact Manh<br> Choh) | |
| • | Out-turn<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> period: | 5<br> business days |
| • | Loco<br> London Swap<br> charges: | US$0.10/oz<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> gol |
| • | Financing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> cost for metal<br> early<br> return:2.00%<br> annually for<br> approximately<br> 8 to 10<br> business days | |
| 16.3.3. | TIME<br> FRAME AND<br> PROCESS | |
| --- | --- |
From the time
of shipment
from Fort
Knox, it is
expected that
the metal will
be available
for sale in
approximately
10 business
days.
Once refined, metal is transferred to Peak Gold’s unallocated bullion accounts. Peak Gold will then periodically sell these ounces to KGMA and CORE Alaska, LLC per their ownership interests in Peak Gold at spot minus 1.75%. KGMA and Contango are responsible for selling their portion of the refined gold and silver externally at prevailing market prices.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 16-2 |
|---|

| 16.4. | MARKETING<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> PLAN |
|---|---|
| 16.4.1. | CUSTOMERS |
| --- | --- |
Contango
will establish
appropriate
banking
relationships
with
international
groups to
accommodate
purchase and
sale
agreements for
the transfers
metal from its
bullion
ACCOUNTS TO
THE ACCOUNT OF
THE PURCHASER.
| 16.4.2. | COMPETITORS |
|---|
Competitors
do not have a
significant
influence on
the price or
quality of
gold and
therefore do
not pose any
threat to the
development of
Manh Choh.
| 16.4.3. | PRICING |
|---|
Gold and silver are financial assets that are actively traded on global exchanges. Prices are set in the open markets and are easily established for the purposes of entering a purchase and sale agreement between Contango and the metal buyers.
| 16.4.4. | PROMOTION |
|---|
The World Gold Council (WGC) has established a conflict-free gold standard that “provides a mechanism by which gold producers can assess and provide assurance that their gold has been extracted in a manner that does not cause, support or benefit unlawful armed conflict or contribute to serious human rights abuses or breaches of international humanitarian law.” As a member of the WGC, KGMA is compliant with the WGC standard, and Manh Choh must also conform to this standard. Therefore, Contango will also conform to this standard. LBMA has established a similar standard, and gold mining companies that comply with WGC’s standard are also deemed to comply with LBMA’s standard. Refineries are obligated to comply with the LBMA standard to maintain their LBMA accreditation. Therefore, all gold mining companies that send material to these refineries must also comply with the LBMA standard.
| 16.5. | PRODUCT<br> DISTRIBUTION |
|---|
Transportation
is arranged by
Kinross Fort
Knox and is
governed by a
contract
between
Kinross Fort
Knox and the
carrier.
Kinross
negotiates the
commercial
terms with the
carriers and
Kinross
Security works
with the
carrier to
develop
standard
operating
procedures.
The doré is driven in an armored vehicle by the carrier from the site to the carrier’s vault in Fairbanks. The doré will then be loaded on a commercial flight at Fairbanks Airport to Anchorage and from Anchorage on another commercial flight to the third party refinery. The estimated pricing is expected to be approximately $4.00/lb of material shipped (including packaging) plus a fixed cost of $2,250 per shipment. These costs are for door-to-door service, including all insurance premiums.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 16-3 |
|---|

Transportation
companies are
required to be
covered under
insurance
policies such
that the cargo
is protected
from the time
the metal is
accepted by
the
transportation
company in the
Fort Knox
mine’s gold
room until the
metal enters
the refinery.
Kinross Fort
Knox also
independently
obtains
contingent
coverage
through its
global
insurance
program, which
will provide
protection if
the carrier
coverage is
inadequate for
any reason.
The ore haulage contract is with Black Gold Transportation, an Alaskan based transportation company based in North Pole, Alaska. KGMA negotiated the contract on behalf of Peak Gold JV.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 16-4 |
|---|

| 17. | ENVIRONMENTAL<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> STUDIES,<br> PERMITTING,<br> AND PLANS,<br> NEGOTIATIONS,<br> OR AGREEMENTS<br> WITH LOCAL<br> INDIVIDUALS OR<br> GROUPS |
|---|---|
| 17.1. | SUMMARY |
| --- | --- |
Environmental
stewardship is
a priority for
Contango, the
Peak Gold JV,
and the Manh
Choh Project.
Contango
strives to
minimize the
environmental
footprint and
address its
environmental
\(sustainability\)
responsibilities
in a manner
that
demonstrates
its commitment
to
industry-wide
leadership. It
was one of the
driving
factors that
led to the
formation of a
joint venture
with KGMA to
process
high-grade
Manh Choh ore
at the Kinross
Fort Knox
facility.
KGMA is the
manager and
operator of
the Project
and as such
broadly
follows its
corporate
approach to
managing all
aspects of the
permitting
process,
environmental
stewardship,
baseline
monitoring,
and
reclamation
covered in
this section.
Contango
and Peak Gold
comply with
applicable
laws,
regulations,
and
commitments,
which promotes
environmental
best
practices, as
stated in the
Kinross Safety
and
Sustainability
Policy. Peak
Gold believes
in being open,
fair, and
honest in all
dealings with
the community
and government
organizations,
both locally,
regionally and
at a federal
level.
| 17.1.1. | ENVIRONMENTAL<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> STUDIES |
|---|
Baseline
studies and
surveys
undertaken for
the Project
include
meteorological,
wetlands,
geochemical,
surface and
ground water
quality, fish
and wildlife,
cultural
resources,
subsistence,
visual
impacts, noise
impacts,
reclamation
and closure,
and
socioeconomic.
Impact
assessment
studies have
also been
conducted and
the results of
these are
summarized in
Section 17.4.
The U.S. Army
Corps of
Engineers
\(ACOE\) will
prepare an
environmental
assessment
\(EA\) for the
Project and a
wetlands
permit was
issued in
September 2022
as part of the
EA.
| 17.1.2. | ENVIRONMENTAL<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> PERMITTING AND<br> MANAGEMENT |
|---|
The Project is located on land owned by the Native Village of Tetlin and is considered private Native land. None of the Project activities are located within federal, state, or local protected areas.
The environmental information for the Manh Choh Project is based on the baseline environmental reports, Project plans, and permit application documents submitted to regulatory agencies on December 31, 2021. This documentation was subsequently amended in November 2022 and re-submitted to the agencies in January 2023. If Project plans change significantly, permit modification requests will be submitted to the appropriate agency as needed.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-1 |
|---|

| 17.1.3. | ENVIRONMENTAL<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> MANAGEMENT<br> SYSTEM |
|---|
The Manh Choh facilities will operate under an environmental management system (EMS) that specifies activities to be planned and implemented by the mine’s environmental management team. The system will be reviewed and updated as part of the continuous improvement cycle to ensure that the new or altered facilities, infrastructure, processes, and operations do not result in adverse impacts to natural, cultural, or human resources. The EMS will be developed in accordance with the Kinross Corporate Responsibility Management System standards and will be implemented by the FGMI Environmental Department.
| 17.2. | CORPORATE<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> POLICIES |
|---|
Kinross
has a
Corporate
Safety and
Sustainability
Policy in
place \(January
2021\) which
defines the
company’s
major
approaches and
objectives in
health and
safety,
environment,
and social
relations.
In accordance with Kinross standards, all projects will be reviewed to ensure that the design incorporates appropriate health and safety, environmental and social considerations. The design must meet applicable regulatory requirements as well as the objectives and standards outlined in the various discipline design criteria.
Designs
will be based
on
site-specific
baseline data.
In accordance
with Kinross
Standard 6.1
Project
Planning,
Design,
Construction
and
Commissioning,
the design
will address,
at a minimum,
liquid
management,
acid
generation,
physical
stability, and
closure, or
demonstrate
that these are
not applicable
to the
specific
project.
| 17.3. | OPERATION<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> AND MANAGEMENT |
|---|
The Project has an Environmental Department, with full-time staff supported by a Kinross corporate team. The Project’s Environmental Manager and supporting team have direct responsibility for ensuring that environmental best practice and the relevant management plans are always followed. The Environmental Department’s duties include, but are not limited to:
| • | reviewing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> all aspects of<br> environmental<br> management,<br> including<br> contractor<br> performance<br> and any<br> site-specific<br> initiatives<br> directly<br> instigated or<br> managed by the<br> mine (e.g.,<br> temporary<br> employment of<br> local people<br> for specific<br> tasks) |
|---|---|
| • | ensuring<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> accountability<br> for the<br> implementation<br> of the<br> management<br> plans; |
| --- | --- |
| • | performing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> site<br> inspections<br> and any formal<br> auditing of<br> both mine and<br> contractor<br> responsibilities; |
| --- | --- |
| • | collating<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and checking<br> environmental<br> monitoring<br> data; |
| --- | --- |
| • | providing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> support for<br> reporting to<br> the relevant<br> authorities,<br> Kinross<br> Corporate and<br> stakeholders. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-2 |
| --- | --- |

| 17.4. | ENVIRONMENTAL<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> STUDIES |
|---|---|
| 17.4.1. | BASELINE<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> STUDIES |
| --- | --- |
Environmental
baseline
conditions
were
established
for the
Project
through a
review of
existing
published
data, new
studies, and
environmental
reporting
undertaken for
the Project.
A summary of the completed environmental and social baseline reports to support the permitting activities for Manh Choh is provided in Table 17‑1.
TABLE 17‑1 MANH CHOH PROJECT BASELINE SURVEY REPORTS ISSUED
| Baseline<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report | Date<br> Issued |
|---|---|
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Meteorological<br> Monitoring<br> Program Annual<br> Report | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Preliminary<br> Jurisdictional<br> Determination<br> Report | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Geochemical<br> Baseline<br> Report | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Waste Rock<br> Management<br> Plan | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Hydrogeological<br> Characterization<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and<br> Groundwater<br> Modeling<br> Summary | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Water<br> Management<br> Plan | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Fish Surveys | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Terrestrial<br> Mammal<br> Occurrence | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Breeding Bird<br> Survey | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Nesting<br> Raptors Survey | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> 2021 Cultural<br> Resources<br> Survey and<br> Evaluation | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> 2021 Cultural<br> Resources<br> Survey and<br> Evaluation,<br> Section8<br> Appendix<br> (Confidential<br> Information –<br> Not for Public<br> Distribution) | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Subsistence<br> Data Review | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Visual<br> Simulation<br> Report | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Noise<br> Technical<br> Report | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Noise<br> Technical<br> Report Twin<br> Road Haul<br> Route Analysis<br> Addendum | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Reclamation<br> and Closure<br> Plan | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Socioeconomic<br> Baseline<br> Profile | May<br> 2021 |
| Manh<br> Choh Project<br> Summary – A<br> Regional<br> Socioeconomic<br> Profile and<br> Assessment of<br> Potential<br> Economic<br> Impacts | December<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 2021 |
The points below summarize key baseline information for the Project area and surroundings:
| • | Geology<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and<br> environmental<br> geochemistry:<br> The majority<br> of the bedrock<br> in the area is<br> a quartz<br> muscovite ±<br> biotite schist<br> (QMS). Waste<br> rock includes<br> portions of<br> material that<br> is potentially<br> acid<br> generating<br> (PAG) and<br> metal leaching<br> (ML). PAG<br> rock, when<br> oxidized by<br> weathering,<br> may form acid<br> which can be<br> harmful to<br> aquatic life.<br> ML rock can<br> leach metal<br> ions which can<br> be harmful to<br> aquatic life. |
|---|
Analysis
of 96 waste
rock samples
showed that
83% of all
oxide
materials are
classified as
PAG. All
types of waste
rock show some
degree of
elevated
arsenic
relative to a
reference
value of 10
times average
global
abundance for
shale. Other
parameters
that were
elevated in at
least some of
the waste rock
samples were
silver,
cadmium,
cobalt,
copper, lead,
and selenium.
Highest
concentrations
were typically
reported in
the skarns. A
waste rock
management
plan has been
developed to
manage PAG
material and
the risk of ML
\(see section
17.6\).
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-3 |
|---|

Manh Choh ore has PAG and non-acid generating (NAG) components and will be processed at Fort Knox prior to the onset of PAG conditions. Leachable arsenic was reported in all Manh Choh ore samples.
Pit wall rock masses assessed as being ML or PAG will be covered during mining and reclamation activities. During mining, surface water run-off and pit inflows will be collected and treated via a perimeter ditch collection system and in-pit dewatering infrastructure.
Analysis
of the
geochemistry
of road
construction
material is
on-going as
access roads
are advanced.
At the time of
report
preparation,
no PAG
material has
been
identified nor
is it expected
based on the
geology along
the road
alignment.
| • | Air<br> quality:<br> The Project is<br> in the<br> Northern<br> Alaska<br> Intrastate Air<br> Quality<br> Control<br> Region. EPA<br> has designated<br> the Project<br> area as in<br> attainment or<br> unclassifiable<br> for all<br> criteria air<br> pollutants.<br> The closest<br> nonattainment<br> area to the<br> Project is the<br> Fairbanks<br> North Star<br> Borough (FNSB)<br> PM2.5<br> Nonattainment<br> Area located<br> approximately<br> 155 miles (250<br> km) to the<br> northwest |
|---|
Existing
meteorological
and ambient
air quality
data sources
available in
proximity to
the Project
area are
limited. Peak
Gold
established a
meteorological
station at the
mine. The
purpose of the
Manh Choh
Meteorological
Monitoring
Program is
collecting
Prevention of
Significant
Deterioration
\(PSD\) quality
surface
meteorological
data to
support
engineering
and design
studies and to
use in
dispersion
modelling for
support of air
permitting
requirements.
The
meteorological
station was
also
constructed to
comply with
Kinross EMS
Standard
10.6.4.2
requiring
sites to have
a
meteorological
station.
| • | Climate:<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> The<br> Project is in<br> the eastern<br> region of the<br> Southeast<br> Interior<br> climate zone,<br> based on the<br> climate<br> boundary zones<br> identified by<br> the National<br> Oceanic and<br> Atmospheric<br> Administration<br> (NOAA). This<br> continental/subarctic<br> climate zone<br> is<br> characterized<br> by short, warm<br> summers and<br> long,<br> extremely cold<br> winters. The<br> regional<br> climate is<br> highly<br> variable.<br> During the<br> winter ambient<br> temperatures<br> can be low as<br> -65°F and<br> low-level<br> temperature<br> inversions are<br> common.<br> Precipitation<br> in the area<br> generally<br> increases with<br> elevation. The<br> lowest<br> temperatures<br> typically<br> occur during<br> January and<br> February and<br> the highest<br> temperatures<br> typically<br> occur in June<br> and July. This<br> temperature<br> pattern is<br> consistent<br> with the<br> continental<br> and subarctic<br> climate<br> conditions in<br> Interior<br> Alaska. |
|---|
Precipitation
usually
accumulates
during the
late-spring,
summer, and
early-fall
months.
Snowfall
typically
occurs in the
months of
September
through May.
On average,
Northway and
Tok experience
approximately
37.4 in. and
40.8 in. of
total snowfall
per year,
respectively.
The annual
average
precipitation
observed at
the Northway
Airport, Tok
No. 1 station,
and Tok No. 2
station was
10.64 in.,
11.25 in., and
12.27 in.,
respectively.
The mean
annual
precipitation
at the Manh
Choh
meteorological
station was
10.97 in.
based on
measurements
collected
during the
Project
Meteorological
Monitoring
Program year
from November
1, 2020 to
October 31,
2021.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-4 |
|---|

| • | Surface<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> water:<br> Manh Choh is<br> located at a<br> hydrographic<br> divide such<br> that surface<br> water flows<br> away from the<br> site in all<br> directions,<br> discharging<br> into three<br> defined<br> national<br> hydrographic<br> basins,<br> including |
|---|---|
| o | NHD<br> 190803020705-Tok<br> River south of<br> Tok River,<br> including<br> Thunder Creek,<br> Grayling<br> Creek,<br> Hillside<br> Creek, South<br> Day Creek, and<br> North Day<br> Creek |
| --- | --- |
| o | Tetlin<br> Lake Catchment<br> NHD<br> 190803020308,<br> including N<br> Black Creek<br> and S Black<br> Creek; and |
| --- | --- |
| o | Tetlin<br> Lake Catchment<br> NHD<br> 190803020310-Tetlin<br> Lake,<br> including<br> Eagle Creek. |
| --- | --- |
Seasonal
intermittent
stream flow
occurs in the
catchment
headwaters on
both sides of
the drainage
divide.
Perennial
stream
segments start
down-gradient
of the Project
area, at
locations of
year-round
groundwater
discharge
which are
delineated by
ice build-up
\(aufeis\) in
winter.
Surface
water
monitoring
data is
available from
19 sites
around Manh
Choh since
2012. Stream
discharge is
perennial in
all
catchments.
Most stream
flows during
the low-flow
late fall and
winter months
are assumed to
represent
baseflows due
to the limited
precipitation
at Manh Choh
during this
period.
Baseflows
range between
approximately
10 gpm and 100
gpm, depending
on location
within the
catchment.
Water quality in the headwater streams that drain the Project area is generally good. Constituent concentrations down-gradient of the site are generally low, but higher concentrations are reported in samples taken from the Tok River and Tetlin Lake. Baseline iron, arsenic, and manganese concentrations in Tors Creek exceed Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) guideline values due to the proximity of the mineralized orebody. Baseline sulfate, metals, and total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations are consistently higher in groundwater than surface water, particularly in the vicinity of the orebody, however, concentrations are not consistently higher than ADEC guideline values. Down-gradient of Manh Choh, water quality of streams reflects the mixing of the mineralized groundwater discharge with runoff from the stream headwaters.
| • | Wetlands:<br> A wetlands<br> preliminary<br> jurisdictional<br> determination<br> study (PJD)<br> was completed<br> and the report<br> presents the<br> findings of<br> the baseline<br> (current<br> existing<br> conditions)<br> fieldwork for<br> a 6,024-acre<br> study area.<br> This includes<br> the extent of<br> vegetation<br> cover and the<br> wetlands and<br> waters within<br> the Project<br> study area.<br> Wetlands and<br> waters include<br> wetlands,<br> streams, and<br> ponds. The<br> 2021 study<br> area wetland<br> mapping is<br> based on the<br> criteria in<br> the ACOE<br> Wetland<br> Delineation<br> Manual, the<br> Regional<br> Supplement to<br> the Corps of<br> Engineers<br> Wetland<br> Delineation<br> Manual: Alaska<br> Region<br> (Version 2.0),<br> and the 2020<br> National<br> Wetland Plant<br> List. The<br> results of the<br> field verified<br> mapping shows<br> that the<br> majority of<br> the area is<br> uplands;<br> wetlands and<br> waters account<br> for 197.8<br> acres (3.3%)<br> of the study<br> area. One<br> pond and<br> numerous<br> narrow streams<br> provide the<br> total waters<br> in the study<br> area. Based on<br> current mine<br> planning and<br> access road<br> construction,<br> the Project<br> will impact a<br> total of 5.2<br> acres of<br> wetlands. |
|---|---|
| • | Fish<br> habitat:<br> The National<br> Hydrography<br> Dataset (NHD)<br> indicates a<br> flowline<br> crossing the<br> Tetlin Village<br> Road. Field<br> inspections<br> revealed that<br> there is no<br> surface water<br> and, as a<br> result, this<br> habitat does<br> not support<br> fish |
| --- | --- |
The Project does not include disturbance of fish habitat. Waters flowing from the Tetlin Hills are first-order streams with high gradients.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-5 |
|---|

| • | Flora<br><br><br> and Fauna: None<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> of the species<br> recorded in<br> the Project<br> area are<br> listed as<br> Threatened or<br> Endangered as<br> specified by<br> the U.S. Fish<br> and Wildlife<br> Service<br> (USFWS). There<br> is only one<br> listed<br> endangered<br> plant species<br> in Alaska. It<br> is a small<br> fern (Polystichum<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> aleuticum)<br> endemic to the<br> Aleutian<br> Islands which<br> does not occur<br> in the Project<br> area. The<br> fauna studies<br> did not<br> identify any<br> federally or<br> state-listed<br> threatened or<br> endangered<br> species. There<br> are some fauna<br> species and<br> habitat worth<br> noting: |
|---|---|
| o | The<br> Tetlin Hills<br> are within the<br> breeding range<br> of the<br> Olive-sided<br> Flycatcher,<br> which is<br> designated by<br> the USFWS as a<br> species of<br> conservation<br> concern in<br> Bird<br> Conservation<br> Region 4 (BCR<br> 4;<br> North-western<br> Interior<br> Forest), which<br> encompasses<br> most of<br> Interior<br> Alaska. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The<br> Short-eared<br> Owl was not<br> observed but<br> is also a<br> species of<br> conservation<br> concern and<br> may occur in<br> the area. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Two<br> Bald Eagle<br> nests were<br> found during<br> the raptor<br> nest survey,<br> both greater<br> than two miles<br> from the<br> Project. The<br> USFWS advises<br> that<br> activities<br> within two<br> miles of Bald<br> Eagle or<br> Golden Eagle<br> nests may<br> require an<br> incidental<br> take permit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Three<br> common raven<br> nests were<br> found and<br> these species<br> are protected<br> under the<br> Migratory Bird<br> Treaty Act<br> (MBTA). |
| --- | --- |
| o | No<br> waterfowl<br> nesting<br> habitat was<br> observed in<br> the Project<br> area.<br> Waterfowl<br> nesting<br> habitat is<br> prevalent in<br> the broader<br> region. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Approximately<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 41 species of<br> mammals may<br> occur in<br> eastern<br> Interior<br> Alaska. Of<br> these, moose<br> and caribou<br> are the most<br> important<br> subsistence<br> species. The<br> Project<br> avoided<br> important<br> lowland moose<br> habitat<br> surrounding<br> the Tok River.<br> Individual<br> animals from<br> two caribou<br> herds may be<br> present<br> seasonally.<br> Caribou avoid<br> areas of<br> recent<br> wildfire,<br> which<br> indicates they<br> may naturally<br> avoid the<br> Project. Dall<br> sheep are not<br> known to occur<br> in the Project<br> area. |
| --- | --- |
| o | No<br> Project<br> activities (on<br> site and off<br> site) are<br> located within<br> protected<br> areas. The<br> closest<br> protected area<br> is the Tetlin<br> National<br> Wildlife<br> refuge, which<br> is<br> approximately<br> 20 to 30 miles<br> to the east<br> and southeast<br> of the<br> Project. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Groundwater:<br> Groundwater<br> flow at the<br> site is<br> extremely low<br> because of the<br> dry conditions<br> and limited<br> recharge area.<br> Any<br> groundwater<br> flow that does<br> occur is<br> localized and<br> will percolate<br> mostly through<br> fractures,<br> faults, and<br> related<br> small-scale<br> structures.<br> The limited<br> overburden<br> thickness and<br> low bedrock<br> hydraulic<br> conductivity<br> further<br> reduces<br> recharge; most<br> precipitation<br> runs off the<br> site. Although<br> there is no<br> active<br> permafrost at<br> the site,<br> zones of<br> discontinuous<br> relict bedrock<br> permafrost do<br> occur, and act<br> to further<br> interrupt the<br> movement of<br> groundwater.<br> The small<br> amount of<br> recharge that<br> does occur is<br> related to<br> spring<br> snowmelt. This<br> causes<br> seasonal<br> increases in<br> piezometric<br> levels of 5 ft<br> to 30 ft. The<br> relatively<br> large seasonal<br> fluctuation of<br> groundwater<br> levels is<br> indicative of<br> a low storage<br> groundwater<br> system. |
| --- | --- |
Groundwater
levels were
monitored
using 14 wells
between 2019
and 2021.
Groundwater
has a wide
range of
constituent
values due to
surface
recharge
sources,
connection to
fracture
porosity,
permafrost
conditions,
and other
factors. The
regional water
table varies
by up to 30 ft
seasonally,
and recharge
response is
delayed by
months.
Elevation
gradually
rises after
snowmelt and
hits seasonal
lows during
the winter.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-6 |
|---|

Groundwater
quality
sampling has
occurred since
2016, for a
total of 15
wells and one
groundwater
seep. Water
quality of the
groundwater
seep sampled
during the
monitoring
program is
indicative of
a natural
magnesium-calcium-bicarbonate
type water,
similar to
surface water.
Arsenic and
sulfate are
two key
naturally
occurring
constituents
of concern
identified
which have
contrasting
behavior in
water. Sulfate
is
conservative,
\(i.e., is
non-reactive
and will tend
to remain in
solution\),
while arsenic
is reactive
and can
naturally be
pulled from
solution by
sorption and
precipitation
processes.
Comparing
these can
highlight the
different
processes in
surface water
and
groundwater.
In
groundwater,
elevated
arsenic is
consistently
associated
with elevated
sulfate
concentrations
across the
range of
wells. In
contrast,
arsenic is
relatively
depleted
versus sulfate
in most
surface
waters. The
contrast
between
surface and
groundwater is
interpreted to
reflect
natural
attenuation
processes
which deplete
arsenic from
groundwater as
it moves
down-gradient
of Manh Choh,
prior to
discharging as
stream
base-flows.
Infiltration
testing
indicates the
upper
weathered
bedrock is
relatively
permeable,
while the
underlying
weathered
bedrock is
seen to be
permeable.
Infiltrated
water is
expected to
flow through
the vadose
zone at low
rates such
that metals
will likely
attenuate in
contact with
organic rich
shallow soils
or weathered
bedrock by
sorption or
reaction
processes. The
low rates of
groundwater
inflow to the
pits, low
bedrock
hydraulic
conductivity,
and deep-water
table mean
that drawdown
is expected to
be limited to
the local
areas of the
pit walls.
| • | Soil:<br> The Project<br> area is<br> generally<br> hilly and<br> steep.<br> Representative<br> soil samples<br> have been<br> collected on<br> Manh Choh as<br> part of the<br> exploration<br> work and<br> baseline<br> studies. Soils<br> were analyzed<br> for a range of<br> geochemical<br> parameters, in<br> particular<br> those elements<br> typically<br> associated<br> with gold<br> mining<br> activities. No<br> evidence<br> exists of soil<br> contamination<br> resulting from<br> previous<br> mining<br> operations. |
|---|---|
| • | Communities:<br> The Project is<br> located on<br> property owned<br> and controlled<br> by the Native<br> Village of<br> Tetlin<br> (Tetlin), an<br> indigenous<br> Upper Tanana<br> Athabascan<br> Native Alaskan<br> community. The<br> village chief<br> and council<br> represent the<br> people and are<br> re-elected<br> every four<br> years, with<br> the most<br> recent<br> election held<br> in 2019. |
| --- | --- |
Tetlin
has a
population of
less than 200,
made up of
Upper Tanana
Athabascans.
The village is
unincorporated
but is a
federally
recognized
native
community, at
least 97%
native or part
Alaska Native,
located in the
federal Tetlin
National
Wildlife
Refuge. The
way of life is
traditional,
with most
people living
a subsistence
way of life.
Alcohol and
drugs are
prohibited in
the community.
The village
has a native
justice system
with a tribal
court which
enforces
Tetlin’s code
of tribal
ordinances.
There is a
volunteer fire
department, a
public safety
officer, and a
search and
rescue team of
about 25
community
members. It is
connected to
the Alaska
highway by a
20-mile dirt
road which
reaches the
village of Tok
on the main
highway where
Alaska State
Troopers are
located.
Tetlin
made the
decision
decades ago
not to
organize under
the ANCSA, and
therefore owns
both the
surface and
subsurface
rights to
their land. In
turn, they
cannot
participate in
or gain any of
the economic
benefits of
belonging to a
native
corporation,
such as a
shareholder
dividend for
tribal members
or access to
training and
education.
The average
annual
household wage
in Tetlin is
less than
$8,000.
The unincorporated community of Tok serves as the larger community in the area, housing most of the public services such as health care and food services. In 2010, the population was 1,500 – down from a decade prior. Tok residents are a mix of mostly non-native Alaskans, native Alaskans, and people wishing to live a more rural lifestyle. Retired military make up some of the residents. The largest employer is the federal and state government.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-7 |
|---|

In 2020, 106 people lived in Tetlin, 1,187 in Tok, and 6,937 in the entire Southeast Fairbanks Census Area. Over the past decade, the population of Tetlin declined by 21 (17%), while Tok’s population declined by 68 (5.4%). These rates of population decline are greater than in the Southeast Fairbanks Census Area overall (1.3%). One active business license is currently issued to a Tetlin address while 188 licenses have been issued to Tok businesses.
| • | Land<br> use: As<br> previously<br> mentioned, the<br> Project is<br> located on<br> land owned by<br> Tetlin. Tetlin<br> is a federally<br> recognized<br> Native tribe.<br> Tetlin is not<br> associated<br> with any<br> regional<br> Alaska Native<br> Corporation.<br> In general,<br> subsurface<br> rights went to<br> regional<br> Alaska Native<br> Corporations.<br> Due to<br> Tetlin’s<br> special<br> status, they<br> have retained<br> ownership of<br> the subsurface<br> mineral<br> rights. Tetlin<br> has had a<br> mineral<br> exploration<br> program in<br> place in the<br> Tetlin Hills<br> since 2008.<br> Tetlin has a<br> community land<br> use plan aimed<br> at the<br> protection,<br> respecting,<br> and<br> utilization of<br> the land. |
|---|
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) database states that all the land surface and subsurface rights in the Tetlin Hills portion of the Project was transferred to the Tetlin Village Corporation circa 1981. The latest planning documents state that there was a land transfer in 1998 from the Tetlin Village Corporation to the Native Village of Tetlin, and the surface and subsurface is currently owned by the Native Village of Tetlin. There are no 17(b) easements in the Tetlin Hills portion of the Project. No land use authorizations are on file with the BLM.
RS2477
right of ways
protect public
access to
lands. The
Tetlin Hills
portion of the
Project is in
the vicinity,
but does not
impact three
RS2477 right
of ways:
| ◾ | Tok<br> River Road<br> Number 233 |
|---|---|
| ◾ | Tok Dog<br> Mushers Trail<br> Number 1759 |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | Slana-Tanana<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Crossing<br> Number 188 |
| --- | --- |
| • | Heritage:<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> No<br> historic-age<br> buildings or<br> historic sites<br> were found.<br> Seven<br> prehistoric<br> archaeological<br> sites were<br> identified and<br> further<br> evaluated<br> during Phase<br> II testing.<br> Based on the<br> Phase II<br> testing and<br> subsequent<br> data analysis,<br> Higgs Research<br> and Consulting<br> (HRC) is of<br> the opinion<br> that five of<br> the seven<br> sites meet<br> federal<br> archaeological<br> site<br> significance<br> criteria<br> making them<br> eligible for<br> listing on the<br> National<br> Register of<br> Historic<br> Places (NRHP).<br> The five<br> eligible sites<br> retain<br> integrity and<br> important<br> archaeological<br> information<br> relevant to<br> understanding<br> the past land<br> use patterns<br> by prehistoric<br> peoples and<br> the<br> development of<br> Native Alaskan<br> culture in the<br> Upper Tanana<br> River region.<br> Two of the<br> seven sites,<br> in HRC’s<br> opinion, lack<br> significance<br> or integrity<br> to meet NRHP<br> eligibility<br> criteria. One<br> of the five<br> eligible sites<br> is located on<br> the highest<br> outcrop within<br> the Project<br> mine area and<br> is the current<br> location of<br> the Manh Choh<br> meteorological<br> (MET) station.<br> At this<br> location, a<br> U.S. Geodetic<br> Survey<br> monument was<br> placed and is<br> associated<br> with an Upper<br> Tanana<br> Athabascan<br> place name.<br> Shovel testing<br> at this<br> multi-component<br> site found<br> both surface<br> and subsurface<br> prehistoric<br> stone tool<br> making<br> material in at<br> least three<br> distinct<br> activity<br> areas. The<br> prehistoric<br> artifacts<br> suggest<br> short-term<br> habitation<br> events and the<br> refurbishing<br> of stone tools<br> while waiting<br> for game to<br> hunt. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-8 |
| --- | --- |

The location of the Twin Road, adjacent to the Tetlin Village Road has not been surveyed by a pedestrian survey, due to the recent addition (Winter 2021) of this project element at the request of Tetlin. This survey will be conducted in 2022 and permitted in accordance with the Alaska State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) requests.
| • | Noise<br><br><br> and vibration: <br> Baseline<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> studies<br> covered the<br> Project area<br> and the<br> highway<br> transportation<br> route to Fort<br> Knox and<br> included 19<br> ambient noise<br> monitoring<br> locations.<br> This area of<br> analysis was<br> chosen because<br> it represents<br> the area where<br> the Project is<br> most likely to<br> affect<br> potential<br> receivers.<br> This<br> monitoring<br> data formed<br> the basis of<br> the modeling<br> for potential<br> noise impacts. |
|---|---|
| • | Visual<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> environment: <br> A study<br> was conducted<br> to<br> characterize<br> the baseline<br> visual<br> resources in<br> the area. The<br> area of<br> analysis was<br> chosen because<br> it represents<br> the area where<br> the Project is<br> most likely to<br> affect visual<br> resources. The<br> proposed mine<br> is located on<br> Tetlin owned<br> lands, which<br> has no visual<br> resource<br> management<br> categories or<br> regulations.<br> The area is<br> generally<br> natural. |
| --- | --- |
| 17.4.2. | ASSESSMENT<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> OF<br> ENVIRONMENTAL<br> IMPACT |
| --- | --- |
Peak Gold prepared an Environmental Information Document (EID) which presents a summary of the Project, baseline environment and potential impacts. Extensive technical reports have been prepared to support the analysis. This EID directly quotes and summarizes the technical reports, provides supplemental analysis for some categories (i.e., land use), and presents a single distilled narrative of baseline resources and potential impacts. The EID defines the potential impacts as:
| • | Negligible<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Impacts:<br> Resource would<br> not be<br> affected, or<br> impacts would<br> not result in<br> a loss of<br> individuals or<br> habitat. |
|---|---|
| • | Minor<br> Impacts:<br> Impacts on<br> resource would<br> be measurable<br> or perceptible<br> and local;<br> however, the<br> overall<br> viability of<br> the resource<br> (i.e.,<br> population or<br> subpopulation)<br> would not be<br> affected and<br> without<br> further<br> adverse<br> impacts the<br> population<br> would recover. |
| --- | --- |
Potential
effects may
include the
temporary,
short-term,
long-term, and
permanent
impacts to the
resource.
Short-term
effects are
changes, such
as habitat
removal, that
end after the
completion of
construction
activities,
mine closure,
and successful
reclamation.
Long-term
effects
consist of
changes
irrespective
of reclamation
success.
Permanent
effects are
associated
with
facilities
that
permanently
alter the
resource
category.
The impacts definitions are intensity, duration, and context are provided in Table 17‑2.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-9 |
|---|

TABLE 17‑2 IMPACT DEFINITIONS
| Attribute | Term | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intensity<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> (severity or<br> levels of<br> magnitude of<br> an impact) | Negligible | Resource<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> would not be<br> affected, or<br> impacts would<br> not result in<br> a loss of<br> individuals or<br> habitat. |
| Minor | Impacts<br> on resource<br> would be<br> measurable or<br> perceptible<br> and local;<br> however, the<br> overall<br> viability of<br> the resource<br> (i.e.,<br> population or<br> subpopulation)<br> would not be<br> affected and<br> without<br> further<br> adverse<br> impacts the<br> population<br> would recover. | |
| Moderate | Impacts<br> would be<br> sufficient to<br> cause a change<br> in the<br> resource<br> (e.g.,<br> abundance,<br> distribution,<br> quantity, or<br> viability);<br> however, the<br> effect would<br> remain local.<br> The change<br> would be<br> measurable and<br> perceptible,<br> but the<br> negative<br> effects may be<br> reversed. | |
| Major | Impacts<br> would be<br> substantial,<br> highly<br> noticeable,<br> and may be<br> permanent in<br> their effect<br> on resource<br> without active<br> management. | |
| Duration<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> (the length of<br> time an effect<br> would occur) | Temporary | Impacts<br> would occur<br> during<br> construction<br> activities<br> (i.e., six<br> months to one<br> year) or<br> during<br> maintenance<br> activities. |
| Short<br> Term | Impacts<br> would occur<br> for one year<br> or less for a<br> part of the<br> resource<br> (e.g.,<br> individual or<br> habitat); five<br> years or less<br> for the<br> resource as a<br> whole. | |
| Long<br> Term | Impacts<br> would occur<br> for greater<br> than one year<br> for a part of<br> the resource<br> (e.g.,<br> individual or<br> habitat);<br> greater than<br> five years for<br> the resource<br> as a whole. | |
| Permanent | Impacts<br> on the<br> resource would<br> be permanent. | |
| Context<br> (effect(s) of<br> an action must<br> be analyzed<br> within a<br> framework, or<br> within<br> physical or<br> conceptual<br> limits) | Localized | Impacts<br> are confined<br> to a small<br> part of the<br> resource<br> (e.g.,<br> population,<br> habitat, or<br> range). |
| Regional | Impacts<br> would affect a<br> widespread<br> area of the<br> resource<br> (e.g.,<br> suitable<br> habitat or the<br> range of the<br> population or<br> species). |
Context
means that the
effect\(s\) of
an action must
be analyzed
within a
framework, or
within
physical or
conceptual
limits.
Resource
categories:
location,
type, or size
of area
affected
\(e.g., local,
regional,
national\); and
affected
interests are
all elements
of context
that
ultimately
determine
significance.
Duration of
effects
typically
refers to the
timeframe, or
length of
time, that a
project’s
effects would
occur relative
to specific
resources.
Table 17‑3 lists the Project’s potential impact significance, which ranges from negligible to minor. This table should be read in conjunction with Table 17‑4 which describes the impacts in summary format.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-10 |
|---|

TABLE 17‑3 IMPACT SUMMARY

TABLE 17‑4 SUMMARY OF ASSESSED IMPACTS OF THE MANH CHOH PROJECT
| Resource<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Area | Resulting<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Impact<br> Significance |
|---|---|
| Air<br> quality | The<br> concentration<br> of air<br> emissions will<br> remain below<br> the assessment<br> level that has<br> been adopted<br> for the<br> protection of<br> human health.<br> Peak Gold will<br> implement an<br> automated<br> warning system<br> for the<br> transport of<br> fugitive dust<br> from the<br> Project. This<br> system informs<br> the operations<br> and<br> environmental<br> management<br> when<br> conditions are<br> present that<br> may present<br> offsite dust<br> transport. Any<br> cumulative<br> impacts to air<br> quality would<br> be negligible.<br> The Project<br> will obtain<br> the required<br> minor air<br> quality<br> permits (minor<br> source<br> specific or<br> general minor<br> air quality<br> permit) as<br> required. As<br> a prerequisite<br> to issuing the<br> required air<br> permits, ADEC<br> would ensure<br> that Project<br> components<br> comply with<br> applicable air<br> quality<br> requirements. |
| Ecology | The<br> overall<br> long-term<br> impact of the<br> habitat loss<br> on site and<br> the ecology of<br> the area are<br> considered<br> low. |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-11 |
| --- | --- |

| Resource<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Area | Resulting<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Impact<br> Significance |
|---|---|
| Birds,<br> Fish, Wildlife | Past,<br> present, and<br> reasonably<br> foreseeable<br> future actions<br> that could<br> contribute to<br> cumulative<br> effects<br> include<br> transportation,<br> subsistence,<br> recreation,<br> and mineral<br> exploration.<br> Transportation<br> and mineral<br> exploration<br> can develop<br> infrastructure<br> in existing<br> habitat,<br> create noise<br> which causes<br> animals to<br> avoid habitat,<br> and cause<br> direct impacts<br> (e.g.,<br> collisions,<br> inadvertent<br> fuel spills).<br> Given the<br> large expanse<br> of fish, bird,<br> and wildlife<br> habitat in the<br> surrounding<br> area, any<br> potential<br> impacts from<br> these<br> activities<br> would be a<br> very small<br> fraction of<br> existing<br> resources.<br> Cumulative<br> impacts for<br> transportation<br> and mineral<br> exploration<br> would be<br> negligible. |
| Subsistence | Past,<br> present, and<br> reasonably<br> foreseeable<br> future actions<br> that could<br> contribute to<br> cumulative<br> effects<br> include<br> transportation,<br> recreation,<br> and mineral<br> exploration.<br> Transportation<br> and mineral<br> exploration<br> can develop<br> infrastructure<br> which can both<br> increase and<br> decrease the<br> impact to<br> subsistence.<br> Infrastructure<br> would fill<br> natural<br> habitat,<br> decreasing the<br> habitat<br> available to<br> subsistence<br> resources.<br> Infrastructure<br> would also<br> provide<br> greater access<br> for<br> subsistence<br> users to<br> engage in<br> traditional<br> activities.<br> One of the<br> major<br> hindrances to<br> subsistence is<br> movement over<br> the landscape.<br><br> <br>The<br> positive and<br> negative<br> impact of<br> either of<br> these<br> activities to<br> subsistence is<br> anticipated to<br> be offset by<br> the large<br> amount of<br> subsistence<br> habitat<br> available in<br> the<br> surrounding<br> area. Impacts<br> to subsistence<br> from<br> transportation<br> and mineral<br> exploration is<br> expected to be<br> negligible. |
| Groundwater | Low<br> significance –<br> existing wells<br> will be<br> monitored to<br> ensure closest<br> users are not<br> impacted by<br> operations. At<br> this stage no<br> dewatering<br> wells are<br> planned and<br> the North and<br> South pits are<br> generally<br> above the<br> groundwater<br> table. Any<br> water<br> encountered<br> will be<br> directed to a<br> sump and<br> managed<br> accordingly.<br><br> <br>No pit<br> lake<br> assessment was<br> conducted<br> since there<br> will not be a<br> pit lake in<br> either the<br> North or South<br> Pit.<br><br> <br>The<br> waste rock<br> will be<br> managed in<br> accordance<br> with a Waste<br> Rock<br> Management<br> Plan to manage<br> PAG material.<br> Mining and<br> reclamation<br> will not leave<br> rock<br> permanently<br> exposed within<br> the pit walls<br> for the North<br> and South<br> pits. Rock<br> walls are ML.<br> A groundwater<br> and solute<br> transport<br> model was used<br> to help<br> optimize the<br> closure plan.<br> The model<br> predicts<br> post-closure<br> water<br> elevations in<br> the North Pit<br> can be<br> maintained to<br> keep most of<br> the backfill<br> material above<br> the water<br> table, and any<br> down gradient<br> seepage will<br> be<br> negligible. A<br> program of<br> enhanced<br> filling with<br> water is<br> planned for<br> the South Pit<br> to minimize<br> the time the<br> backfill<br> remains<br> unsaturated.<br> Modelling<br> indicates that<br> virtually all<br> parameters in<br> the down<br> gradient<br> headwaters<br> will be below<br> the ADEC<br> guideline<br> values.<br><br> <br>The ore<br> is potentially<br> PAG and NAG.<br> The ore will<br> be temporarily<br> stored on site<br> and loaded<br> into trucks<br> for transport<br> to Fort Knox<br> for<br> processing. At<br> Fort Knox, the<br> ore will be<br> blended to<br> form a NAG<br> composite. |
| Surface<br> water | Low<br> significance<br> and manageable<br> through the<br> storm water<br> pollution<br> prevention<br> plan. |
| Noise<br> and vibration | Limited<br> disturbance<br> from increased<br> traffic volume<br> is expected.<br> Negligible to<br> low noise or<br> vibration<br> impacts are<br> anticipated<br> beyond the<br> mine site.<br> Mitigation of<br> such impacts<br> along the<br> length of<br> Tetlin Village<br> Road and Twin<br> Road is<br> anticipated. |
| Soils<br> and land use | Negligible<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> impact on land<br> use during<br> construction<br> and operation<br> is<br> anticipated. <br> Exploration<br> and mining<br> activities are<br> within<br> Tetlin’s land<br> use goals. |
| Traffic | Additional<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> traffic<br> volumes<br> associated<br> with<br> construction<br> and operation<br> phases are<br> anticipated<br> and considered<br> low. Tetlin<br> and Alaska<br> Department of<br> Transportation<br> (ADOT) are<br> being<br> consulted and<br> projects are<br> anticipated to<br> reduce traffic<br> hazards. Past,<br> present, and<br> reasonably<br> foreseeable<br> future actions<br> that could<br> contribute to<br> cumulative<br> effects<br> include<br> transportation<br> and mineral<br> exploration.<br><br> <br>The<br> transportation<br> projects are<br> anticipated to<br> have a<br> positive<br> impact on<br> cumulative<br> traffic. The<br> proposed<br> improvements<br> have long been<br> desired by the<br> area<br> communities. |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-12 |
| --- | --- |

| Resource<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Area | Resulting<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Impact<br> Significance |
|---|---|
| Socioeconomics | Past,<br> present, and<br> reasonably<br> foreseeable<br> future actions<br> (RFFAs) that<br> could<br> contribute to<br> cumulative<br> effects<br> include<br> transportation,<br> recreation,<br> and mineral<br> exploration.<br> Both<br> activities can<br> provide<br> increases in<br> economic<br> activity in<br> the region,<br> from direct<br> sales to<br> indirect<br> activities<br> such as food<br> and lodging.<br> The regional<br> economy is<br> largely based<br> on the<br> transportation<br> network<br> running<br> through the<br> Upper Tanana<br> Valley, and<br> increased<br> spending would<br> improve local<br> incomes.<br><br> <br>These<br> activities<br> could also<br> have negative<br> socioeconomic<br> effects,<br> including<br> causing<br> strains on<br> social<br> services such<br> as police,<br> fire, health<br> care, housing,<br> and utilities.<br> None of the<br> RFFAs are<br> anticipated to<br> be of a scale<br> large enough<br> to have a<br> negative<br> impact on<br> socioeconomics.<br> The current<br> infrastructure<br> is sized to<br> accommodate<br> these<br> potential<br> activities.<br><br> <br>Overall,<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> the potential<br> impact to<br> socioeconomics<br> is either<br> negligible or<br> positive. |
| Social<br> Justice | Past,<br> present, and<br> RFFAs that<br> could<br> contribute to<br> cumulative<br> effects<br> include<br> transportation,<br> recreation,<br> subsistence,<br> and mineral<br> exploration.<br> Tetlin Village<br> and Tok are<br> both<br> environmental<br> justice<br> populations.<br> Positive<br> impacts from<br> the potential<br> cumulative<br> impacts<br> include the<br> addition of<br> jobs, income,<br> and<br> infrastructure<br> to these<br> communities.<br> Recreation and<br> subsistence<br> also improve<br> the quality of<br> life of<br> residents in<br> Tetlin Village<br> and Tok,<br> although in<br> ways more<br> difficult to<br> quantitatively<br> measure.<br><br> <br>Negative<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> impacts are<br> anticipated to<br> be negligible<br> given the<br> current<br> permitting<br> requirements<br> for<br> transportation<br> and mineral<br> exploration.<br> Tetlin also<br> owns the<br> surface and<br> subsurface<br> rights, and so<br> controls the<br> activities on<br> their land in<br> the Tetlin<br> Hills, further<br> decreasing the<br> potential for<br> a negative<br> impact.<br><br> <br>Cumulative<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> impacts to<br> environmental<br> justice<br> communities<br> are<br> anticipated to<br> be positive. |
| Archaeology<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and cultural<br> heritage | Based<br> on the 2021<br> mine and<br> infrastructure<br> plans, the<br> Project could<br> impact one<br> NRHP eligible<br> site as<br> described in<br> the baseline<br> (section<br> 17.4.1). The<br> four other<br> NRHP eligible<br> sites should<br> be avoidable<br> during the<br> life of the<br> mine; however,<br> avoidance of<br> all seven<br> prehistoric<br> sites is<br> recommended to<br> prevent any<br> damage to<br> their current<br> condition or<br> integrity<br> until ACOE<br> NRHP<br> eligibility<br> determinations<br> are<br> formalized.<br> Should ACOE<br> agree with<br> HRC’s<br> recommendations,<br> then ACOE will<br> need to<br> prepare a<br> Programmatic<br> Agreement (PA)<br> within a<br> consultation<br> framework<br> involving Peak<br> Gold, Tetlin<br> Village<br> (landowner and<br> stakeholder),<br> the State<br> Historic<br> Preservation<br> Officer<br> (SHPO), and<br> other<br> interested<br> parties. The<br> PA will detail<br> treatments to<br> mitigate any<br> potential<br> adverse<br> effects to<br> historic<br> properties<br> that may be<br> caused by the<br> Project.<br><br> <br>A Phase<br> II Twin Road<br> investigation<br> will be<br> performed<br> during the<br> summer of<br> 2022. Historic<br> significant<br> items and<br> documentation<br> will be<br> provided to<br> Tetlin.<br><br> <br>A<br> Cultural<br> Heritage<br> Management<br> Plan has been<br> developed to<br> address the<br> Phase III<br> mitigation<br> plan for the<br> NRHP eligible<br> archaeological<br> site TNX-270<br> (CTA-01) that<br> will be<br> adversely<br> affected by<br> the Project<br> and future<br> discoveries of<br> cultural<br> resources that<br> may be<br> discovered<br> during the<br> Project’s<br> construction<br> and operation.<br><br> <br>Any<br> recoverable<br> artifacts,<br> data, and<br> documentation<br> will be<br> provided to<br> Tetlin. |
| Landscape<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> and visual | The<br> visual impacts<br> encountered<br> with the<br> Project are<br> minor and<br> reclamation<br> will mitigate<br> visual impacts<br> from the<br> mining site.<br> Any cumulative<br> impacts to<br> visual<br> resources will<br> be negligible. |
| Waste<br> management | With<br> mitigation and<br> proper<br> management,<br> adverse<br> impacts for<br> waste rock<br> management are<br> considered to<br> be of minor<br> significance. |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-13 |
| --- | --- |

| Resource<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Area | Resulting<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Impact<br> Significance |
|---|---|
| Climate<br> change | Past,<br> present, and<br> reasonably<br> foreseeable<br> future actions<br> that could<br> contribute to<br> cumulative<br> effects with<br> the proposed<br> mine include<br> transportation<br> and mineral<br> exploration.<br> Both<br> activities<br> lead to an<br> increase in<br> air emissions.<br> Air quality<br> permits would<br> be obtained<br> when required,<br> and there are<br> no significant<br> air quality<br> concerns for<br> the area. Any<br> cumulative<br> impacts to air<br> quality would<br> be negligible.<br> The cumulative<br> activities<br> would involve<br> emissions of<br> greenhouse<br> gases from<br> consumption of<br> fuel. The<br> increase in<br> emissions from<br> cumulative<br> impacts would<br> be negligible. |
Environmental
consequences
described are
issues-based.
This means
only the
resource
categories
anticipated to
be affected by
the Project
are included.
Remaining
resources
categories
that are not
anticipated to
be affected or
that are not
applicable are
considered
non-issue
resources and
are summarized
in Table
17‑5. These
resource
categories are
not included
in detailed
analysis of
the EID.
TABLE 17‑5 NON-ISSUE RESOURCE CATEGORIES

CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS
Peak Gold has assessed climate change impacts of its proposed Manh Choh Project within the broader framework of Kinross’ corporate climate change strategy (Stantec, 2021a) including:
| • | Incorporating<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> energy<br> efficiency<br> measures that<br> are economic<br> over the life<br> of mine. |
|---|---|
| • | Implementing<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> a corporate<br> fuel<br> management<br> policy to<br> improve energy<br> efficiency. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Seeking<br> opportunities<br> with electric<br> power<br> provider,<br> Alaska Power<br> &<br> Telephone, to<br> reduce<br> greenhouse gas<br> (GHG)<br> emissions. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Working<br> with Tetlin<br> Village to<br> implement<br> community<br> projects with<br> GHG reduction<br> benefits. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-14 |
| --- | --- |

In the EID (Stantec 2021a), Peak Gold characterized GHG emissions from Manh Choh to be negligible within a short-term duration. Although the Manh Choh Project GHG emissions will be immaterial in the context of global emissions, KGMA’s indirect parent, Kinross, has publicly stated its corporate commitment to work toward the goals of the Paris Agreement with the ultimate objective of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. In working toward this objective, Kinross is advancing a strategy to include tangible GHG reductions by 2030 based on fuel efficiency and switching to renewable energy where feasible (Boreal Environmental Services 2022).
With respect to climate change effects of the Project on the local environment, it is important to note that GHG emissions from a specific project do not cause localized impacts that can be compared to an ambient air quality standard the way criteria pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides or sulfur dioxide, can be. GHGs, such as carbon dioxide, are ubiquitous in the atmosphere and, therefore, impacts from GHG are global in nature rather than local. Consequently, local climate change impacts from Project GHG emissions will be virtually nonexistent (Boreal Environmental Services 2022).
Climate
change
adaptation and
resiliency are
important
considerations
in Manh Choh
mine design
even though
the proposed
mine life is
only 4.6
years. Climate
change impacts
that could
affect mines
include water
stress, e.g.,
more frequent
droughts or
severe
rainstorms and
flooding. Manh
Choh would be
a low
water-usage
mine so
droughts would
not have a
significant
impact on
operations. If
more frequent
or intense
rainstorms
occur, the
mine is well
situated on a
hilltop high
above the
flood plain
\(Stantec
2021a\).
Managing
storm water
runoff is an
important
long-term
issue. Manh
Choh is
designed to
safely manage
a 1 in
100-year storm
event, an
important
aspect of
post-closure
resiliency.
This type of
low
probability,
high impact
storm event is
predicted to
become more
frequent with
climate
change. By
designing to
low
probability
events,
infrastructure
would be
inherently
resilient to
changes in
precipitation
over the
relatively
short mine
life \(Stantec
2021a\).
All waste rock storage areas are designed to minimize recharge and to isolate PAG and ML material, and therefore minimize any potential for external discharge from the waste rock over the long term. Any future changes to mean annual rates and seasonal patterns of precipitation and temperature are therefore not expected to change net infiltration or otherwise affect the environmental design intent of the waste rock facilities (Stantec 2021a).
| 17.5. | MANAGEMENT<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> OF IMPACTS |
|---|---|
| 17.5.1. | GENERAL |
| --- | --- |
Policies,
procedures,
and
requirements
for
environmental
protection and
compliance
with
regulatory
requirements
at Manh Choh
will be
developed once
regulatory
agency
permits,
plans, and
agreements are
approved and
issued. These
agency
documents will
provide
specific
regulatory
requirements
that will be
used for
development of
Manh Choh’s
policies and
procedures.
These policies
and procedures
will be
incorporated
into the Manh
Choh
Environmental
Management
Plan \(EMP\).
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-15 |
|---|

The EMP will describe the Manh Choh EMS and provide guidance towards meeting the objectives of the Peak Gold Safety and Sustainability Policy. This policy will be aligned with the Kinross Corporate Safety and Sustainability Policy. The EMP will be a tool for ongoing environmental compliance assurance, planning, auditing, and budgeting, with a focus on continuous improvement of the system. The EMP will apply to all aspects of Manh Choh operations, including, but not limited to, mine construction and operations, crushing, maintenance, warehousing, and exploration activities, as well as ancillary facilities (e.g., ore transfer, water management, powder magazine, reverse osmosis water treatment system, etc.). The EMP will describe environmental tasks; list environmental permits, licenses, and authorizations and corresponding obligations; contain inspection and monitoring routines and checklists; and include reporting and environmental management procedures. The EMP is aligned with Kinross Corporate Responsibility Management System (CRMS) Environmental Management System standards. The following sections will be included in the EMP.
| • | Section<br> 1.0<br> Introduction |
|---|---|
| • | Section<br> 2.0<br> Environmental<br> Department |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.0 General<br> Department<br> Responsibilities |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.1 Mine<br> Operations |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.2 Mine<br> Maintenance |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.3 Crusher |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.4<br> Exploration |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.5 Technical<br> Services |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.6 Water<br> Management |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.7 Ore<br> Transfer |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.8 Personnel<br> Camp |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 3.9<br> Environmental |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 4.0<br> Environmental<br> Obligations |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 5.0<br> Environmental<br> Review |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 5.1 Management<br> of Change |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 5.2 Corporate<br> Environmental<br> Review |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 6.0 Document<br> Retention<br> Policy |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 6.1 Document<br> Location |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 7.0 Contractor<br> Management |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 8.0 Spill<br> Response<br> Procedures |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 8.1 State of<br> Alaska<br> Reportable<br> Spills |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-16 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Section<br> 8.2 Federal<br> Reportable<br> Spills |
|---|---|
| • | Section<br> 9.0 Permits,<br> Licenses and<br> Authorizations |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 10.0 Personnel<br> Training |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 10.1 General |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 10.2 Hazardous<br> Waste |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 10.3 Hazardous<br> Materials<br> Management and<br> Transportation |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 10.4 Emergency<br> Response |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 10.5 Spill<br> Prevention |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 10.6 Storm<br> Water |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 11.0 Waste<br> Management |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 11.1 Solid<br> Waste |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 11.2 Hazardous<br> Waste |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 11.3 Universal<br> Waste |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 11.4 Waste<br> Minimization |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 12.0 Air<br> Quality<br> Management |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 12.1 Title I<br> Air Quality<br> Control Minor<br> Permit |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 12.2 Air<br> Monitoring |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 13.0 Discharge<br> Water |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 14.0<br> Compliance<br> Monitoring |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 14.1 Quality<br> Assurance and<br> Quality<br> Control |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 15.0 Planned<br> Inspections |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 16.0 Aspects<br> Analysis |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 17.0<br> Objectives and<br> Targets |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 17.1<br> Environmental<br> Objectives |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 17.2<br> Performance<br> Indicators |
| --- | --- |
| • | Section<br> 17.3<br> Performance<br> Targets |
| --- | --- |
The existing principal documents will be updated and other plans to be prepared for the Project will provide specific instructions for environmental aspects include:
| • | Manh<br> Choh Safety<br> and<br> Sustainability<br> Policy |
|---|---|
| • | Manh<br> Choh Water<br> Management<br> Plan |
| --- | --- |
| • | Manh<br> Choh Waste<br> Rock<br> Management<br> Plan |
| --- | --- |
| • | Manh<br> Choh Solid<br> Waste<br> Management<br> Plan |
| --- | --- |
| • | Manh<br> Monitoring<br> Plan |
| --- | --- |
| • | Manh<br> Choh<br> Biological<br> Resources Plan |
| --- | --- |
| • | Manh<br> Choh Cultural<br> Heritage Plan |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-17 |
| --- | --- |

| 17.5.2. | OPERATIONS<br><br><br><br><br><br> PHASE |
|---|
This section discusses key management plans specific to the operations phase. These plans have been developed to align with Kinross corporate plans and will continue to be reviewed periodically and updated during the operations phase as required.
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Air quality management at Manh Choh will be in accordance with applicable State of Alaska regulations and the yet to be issued Title I Air Quality Control Minor Permit. An air quality management plan will be developed and implemented once the air permit is issued.
Air monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the air emissions permit and anticipated air quality impacts will be minimal.
Manh Choh will develop fugitive emissions (dust) procedures to reduce emissions from Project operations. Peak Gold will develop and implement an automated warning system for the transport of fugitive dust from the site. This system will inform the operations and environmental management when conditions are present that may indicate offsite dust transport.
GHG emissions are not anticipated to be significant. Environmental personnel will review the contractor’s project Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for any GHG maintenance products and recommend that the contractor make a substitution for an acceptable non-GHG containing product. Equipment and structural air conditioning equipment will be maintained by qualified maintenance personnel using GHG recycling equipment.
As discussed in section 17.4.2, climate change adaptation and resiliency are important considerations in mine design. Climate change impacts that could affect mines include water stress, e.g., more frequent droughts or severe rainstorms and flooding. Manh Choh is proposed to be a low water-usage mine so droughts would not have a significant impact on operations. If more frequent or intense rainstorms occur, the mine is well situated on a hilltop high above the flood plain.
CULTURAL
HERITAGE
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
If any significant new discoveries are made within the Project area, the mine will immediately report what was found to the State of Alaska Office of Heritage and Archaeology.
CHEMICALS
AND PETROLEUM
MANAGEMENT
PROCEDURE
Use and handling of chemicals and fuels will be in accordance with the requirements of the ADNR and Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADEC) including federal and State permit requirements.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-18 |
|---|

Design
is a critical
element for
ensuring the
correct
management of
chemicals and
fuels. The
design
features of
each storage
option
consider
aspects of
containment,
security and
safety
measures,
including:
| • | Applicable<br><br><br><br><br><br> legislation<br> and<br> environmental<br> permit<br> requirements |
|---|---|
| • | Methods<br> of containment<br> and system<br> integrity |
| --- | --- |
| • | Minimum<br> distances from<br> ignition<br> sources,<br> process areas,<br> occupied<br> buildings, and<br> site<br> boundaries |
| --- | --- |
| • | Fire<br> resistance,<br> including the<br> effects of<br> fire on the<br> containment<br> system |
| --- | --- |
| • | Impermeability<br><br><br><br><br><br> and resistance<br> to attack from<br> materials<br> stored |
| --- | --- |
| • | Nature<br> of the product<br> to be stored |
| --- | --- |
| • | Firefighting<br><br><br><br><br><br> systems |
| --- | --- |
| • | Security<br><br><br><br><br><br> and signage |
| --- | --- |
| • | Ventilation<br><br><br><br><br><br> at high and<br> low levels |
| --- | --- |
| • | Need to<br> segregate<br> incompatible<br> products |
| --- | --- |
CONSUMABLE
AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL
TRANSPORTATION
Manh Choh uses the management plans described in this section to manage solid and hazardous waste that provide procedures to Manh Choh employees and contractors for onsite spill response, handling, storing, containerizing, and offsite shipment of solid and hazardous waste.
The Manh Choh Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) sets procedures and functional responsibilities for the Resource Conservation Recovery Act's (RCRA) activities at Manh Choh. The SWMP will provide details for managing solid waste, universal waste, and hazardous waste. The SWMP will identify the proper packaging, marking, labelling, and transportation requirements of regulated waste. The SWMP will be updated to provide appropriate training requirements for Project personnel that generate and handle solid waste, universal waste, and hazardous wastes.
The Manh Choh Mine Spill Reporting Procedures & Waste Disposal procedures will be developed and will be the other component to the SWMP. The spill procedures document will be issued to all employees and contractors for proper spill response actions and spill cleanup management. This plan and booklet will address construction and operation phases of the mine, and both will be updated, when necessary, as the Project continues to develop.
The Manh Choh Waste Minimization Plan will be developed and provide guidelines that may be used by mine personnel to reduce the generation of wastes generated at Manh Choh.
INTERNATIONAL
CYANIDE
MANAGEMENT
CODE
No cyanide processes will be used at Manh Choh. Ore will be transported to Fort Knox for processing.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-19 |
|---|

ENERGY USE AND CONSERVATION MEASURES
Manh Choh will generate its electricity from diesel powered generators. The local utility, Alaska Power and Telephone does not have power generation capability to provide power to the Manh Choh mine site. The diesel generators will use EPA Tier 4 engines, which are required to comply with the current federal emission standards for stationary engines.
Manh Choh uses diesel and used oil in its boilers and heaters. Use of these two fuels is monitored routinely for compliance with the Project’s Title I Air Quality Permit.
Conservation
measures of
energy use are
evaluated for
onsite
equipment and
projects. The
FGMI’s
Achieving
Excellence and
management of
change
programs are
examples of
evaluation
methods.
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
PLANS
The Project will have a centralized emergency response team (ERT) to cover all emergencies, with processes and procedures for different emergency scenarios. The emergency response plans will be reviewed and revised as necessary. Examples of the Project’s Emergency Response Plan will include:
| • | Emergency<br><br><br><br><br><br> response<br> procedures for<br> initial<br> emergency<br> response and<br> communication,<br> offsite<br> medical<br> treatment,<br> emergency<br> evacuation,<br> emergency<br> notification<br> (offsite and<br> onsite), and<br> incident<br> reporting. |
|---|---|
| • | Emergency<br><br><br><br><br><br> response<br> program<br> objectives,<br> preparedness<br> performance<br> responsibilities,<br> emergency team<br> and control<br> center. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Incident<br><br><br><br><br><br> categories and<br> risk<br> assessment. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Risk<br> control for<br> physical<br> threats and<br> actions, bomb<br> threats,<br> severe<br> weather,<br> hazardous<br> materials,<br> earthquakes,<br> critical<br> injury/fatality,<br> oil spills,<br> and fire. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Appendices<br><br><br><br><br><br> of the<br> Emergency<br> Response Plan<br> include, as<br> examples,<br> mutual aid<br> agreement,<br> security<br> measures and<br> response<br> actions, ERT<br> members, Mine<br> Safety and<br> Health<br> Administration<br> notification<br> script, ERT<br> training,<br> emergency<br> medical supply<br> list, ERT<br> rescue<br> trailer, and<br> support<br> equipment<br> checklist. |
| --- | --- |
BIOLOGICAL
RESOURCES
PROTECTION
PLAN
No protected areas are within the area occupied by the mine.
| • | The<br> biodiversity<br> action plan<br> will be the<br> Environmental<br> Manager’s or<br> appointed<br> representative’s<br> responsibility,<br><br><br><br><br><br> and will<br> include<br> provisions<br> for: |
|---|---|
| • | Recording<br><br><br><br><br><br> and analyzing<br> any notable<br> sightings of<br> any avian or<br> terrestrial<br> fauna, flora<br> and invasive<br> species<br> observed on<br> and off site. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Routinely<br><br><br><br><br><br> checking for<br> bird and<br> animal<br> mortalities at<br> the Project<br> facilities<br> including<br> access roads. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Establishing<br><br><br><br><br><br> habitat and<br> vegetation<br> measures,<br> which<br> potentially<br> may include: |
| --- | --- |
| o | pre-construction<br><br><br><br><br><br> fauna surveys<br> to verify<br> baseline<br> surveys and<br> address<br> potential new<br> fauna<br> habitation. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Removing<br><br><br><br><br><br> any invasive<br> alien species,<br> including an<br> assessment<br> during and<br> after the<br> eventual<br> closure phase. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-20 |
| --- | --- |

HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS AND
SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Hazardous
Materials
Hazardous
materials need
to be
carefully
managed to
minimize both
environmental
and
occupational
health and
safety \(EHS\)
risks.
Accordingly, a
combined EHS
approach has
been adopted,
which covers:
| • | Collation<br><br><br><br><br><br> of SDS<br> information<br> and risk<br> assessment and<br> mitigation<br> actions,<br> including<br> definition of<br> correct<br> emergency<br> response<br> measures for<br> all hazardous<br> materials on<br> site (e.g.<br> chemicals,<br> fuels and<br> lubricants,<br> bottled gases,<br> explosives,<br> and<br> radiological<br> sources). |
|---|---|
| • | Provision<br><br><br><br><br><br> of awareness<br> training,<br> information<br> and signage,<br> including<br> updates as<br> appropriate.<br> Personnel will<br> be trained in<br> the safe<br> handling,<br> storage, and<br> disposal of<br> hazardous<br> substances,<br> with<br> particular<br> regard to<br> minimizing<br> possible<br> exposure<br> (e.g., through<br> the use of<br> personal<br> protective<br> equipment). |
| --- | --- |
| • | Provision<br><br><br><br><br><br> and correct<br> use of<br> suitable and<br> sufficient<br> personal<br> protective and<br> decontamination<br><br><br><br><br><br> equipment<br> (such as a<br> respirator,<br> goggles,<br> gloves,<br> personal<br> dosimeters,<br> emergency<br> eyewash<br> stations and<br> shower<br> facilities,<br> and spill<br> kits). |
| --- | --- |
| • | Correct<br> location and<br> design of all<br> storage<br> facilities for<br> hazardous<br> substances and<br> hydrocarbons<br> in a manner<br> that complies<br> with<br> applicable<br> regulations<br> and company<br> and industry<br> best<br> practices. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Correct<br> operation of<br> all hazardous<br> material<br> storage areas<br> in a safe and<br> secure manner,<br> with<br> restricted<br> access and<br> proper<br> supervision at<br> all times. |
| --- | --- |
Special
measures will
be implemented
for refuelling
operations and
mining
explosives,
including
routine
inspection and
maintenance of
all hazardous
material
storage.
Explosives and
fuel storage
areas will be
inspected at
least weekly
if not more
often.
Geological
Materials
Management
Plan
The Waste Rock Management Plan (WRMP) plan provides detail on the procedures for characterizing,
classifying,
and managing
waste rock
associated
with the
proposed Manh
Choh Project.
The first step
in developing
a WRMP is to
characterize
the
geochemical
behavior of
the various
waste rock
material types
associated
with the
Project. This
characterization
defines the
potential for
the waste rock
material to
generate acid
or leach
deleterious
constituents.
The
characterization
is used to
develop a
classification
system that
can be used
during
implementation
of a waste
rock handling
plan that
manages waste
rock materials
for different
facilities.
Specifically,
the WRMP
includes:
| • | A<br> summary of the<br> geochemical<br> characterization<br> programs<br> undertaken to<br> date that<br> define the<br> geochemical<br> behavior of<br> the waste<br> rock. |
|---|---|
| • | The<br> volume of<br> waste rock to<br> be produced<br> according to<br> the current<br> long-range<br> mine plan. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Waste<br> rock<br> classification<br> according to<br> operational<br> criteria for<br> waste rock<br> management. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Waste<br> rock placement<br> design and<br> procedures to<br> minimize<br> potential<br> oxidation and<br> solute<br> generation. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Reclamation<br><br><br><br><br><br> and closure<br> activities<br> planned for<br> the waste rock<br> disposal<br> facilities. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-21 |
| --- | --- |

The WRMP incorporates acid base accounting (ABA) and solute generation information, and general waste rock volumes and types, in order to optimize the development of waste rock disposal facilities and minimize the potential for constituent releases, while supporting final closure actions.
The Project has proposed a geochemical waste rock classification system which consists of four waste rock management domains for oxide and four domains for transition/sulfide materials according to acid generating and/or metal leaching potential. The material classifications will inform mine planning waste segregation and development of the mine WRMP. Site specific neutralization potential/acid generating potential ratios have been developed for oxide and sulfide material. Thresholds for high and low metal leaching were also developed for oxide and sulfide materials based upon As/S molar ratios. Arsenic is identified as a parameter of concern and the expectation is that arsenic mobility will be different for sulfide and oxide materials due to a difference in mineralogical hosts. The molar ratios were developed using the relationship between As/S in solids and the rate of arsenic leaching indicated by humidity cell tests.
The ore has potentially PAG and NAG components. All ore will be temporarily stored on site and loaded into trucks for transport to Fort Knox for processing. At Fort Knox, the ore will be blended to form a NAG composite. The blended composite may have elevated copper and other metals (e.g., cobalt, copper, molybdenum, and selenium).
Mining
and
reclamation
will not leave
rock
permanently
exposed within
the pit walls
for both pits.
Any waters
contacting pit
walls have the
potential to
influence the
overall water
chemistry and
will be
treated as
needed.
The WRMP will periodically be modified to integrate data from ongoing geochemical studies, mine modeling changes, mine planning, WRD performance monitoring, and changes to the Integrated Waste Management Permit and/or other information.
SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN
Management
of petroleum
will comply
with the
requirements
specified 40
CFR Part 112,
Oil Pollution
Prevention. A
Spill
Prevention,
Control, and
Countermeasure
Plan \(SPCC\)
will be
developed and
implemented
for the
Project.
Currently,
there is an
existing SPCC
for the
ongoing
exploration
project which
will need
revision to
comply with
mining
activities.
The Project will develop and implement a Spill Reporting Procedures and Waste Disposal Plan that will provide Manh Choh and contractor personnel with the procedures for reporting and managing waste from spills of hazardous materials including oil/petroleum, and their reportable quantities. The plan will describe response procedures, notification to supervisors, reporting procedures, facility contacts, waste inventory, and disposal procedures.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-22 |
|---|

All hazardous material containers greater than and equal to 55 gal are stored in secondary containment to avoid spills/releases to the environment. Containment of hazardous materials will be compliant with Kinross’ Environmental Management System Standard 10.5, Chemical and Petroleum Management. The current exploration project complies with Standard 10.5.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
During
construction
of the access
road
improvements
and mine
infrastructure
for the
Project,
co-permittee
applications
\(contractor
and Peak Gold\)
as specified
by the Alaska
Pollutant
Discharge
Elimination
System \(APDES\)
Construction
General Permit
Number
AKR100000 will
be submitted
to the ADEC. A
Storm Water
Pollution
Prevention
Plan \(SWPPP\)
will be
prepared and
implemented to
control storm
water during
construction
activities.
During
mining, an
APDES storm
water
discharge
authorization
application as
specified by
the APDES
Multi-Sector
General Permit
\(MSGP\) Number
AKR060000 will
be submitted
to the ADEC,
and mining
will not begin
until an
authorization
has been
approved. It
is anticipated
that the
existing MSGP
Authorization
Number
AKR06GA93 for
the Tetlin
Project \(hard
rock
exploration\)
will be
amended for
the Project
mining
activities.
The existing
SWPPP for the
Tetlin Project
will be
amended and
implemented
for the
Project’s
mining
activities.
WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
A dewatering water management plan has been developed for the existing Manh Choh operations and will be reviewed and updated if necessary.
PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT
AND MONITORING
PLAN
The Manh Choh Environmental Monitoring Plan has been developed for the Project and will be reviewed and updated as necessary to accommodate permit requirements. The plan covers pre-operational and operational monitoring, as well as closure monitoring. The main types of monitoring are as follows:
| • | Geological<br><br><br><br><br><br> materials<br> monitoring and<br> characterization<br><br><br><br><br><br> for acid<br> generation<br> potential |
|---|---|
| • | Potable<br> water supply<br> monitoring |
| --- | --- |
| • | Avian<br> and<br> terrestrial<br> wildlife<br> monitoring |
| --- | --- |
| • | Water<br> quality<br> monitoring |
| --- | --- |
| • | Wildlife<br><br><br><br><br><br> Mortality<br> Reporting |
| --- | --- |
| 17.5.3. | ENVIRONMENTAL<br><br><br><br><br><br> MANAGEMENT<br> SYSTEM |
| --- | --- |
The EMS will be developed in accordance with the Kinross Corporate Responsibility Management System and will be implemented by the FGMI Environmental Department. Any new requirements that emerge from new projects and any standards that might be required by international investors and lenders are periodically incorporated into the existing EMS and reviewed regularly.
The overall structure of the EMS will be described in the Manh Choh EMP.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-23 |
|---|

An environmental and occupational health and safety approach will be adopted for contractor management. This approach will ensure that all contractors and any subcontractors, or other organizations or individuals working on their behalf are:
| • | Fully<br> informed of<br> the mine’s<br> environmental<br> policy and<br> environmental<br> management<br> system, and<br> are aware that<br> their<br> compliance<br> will be<br> monitored |
|---|---|
| • | capable<br> of meeting all<br> relevant<br> environmental<br> legislative or<br> regulatory<br> requirements<br> associated<br> with the<br> activity in<br> which they are<br> engaged |
| --- | --- |
| • | Committed<br><br><br><br><br><br> to minimizing<br> negative<br> impacts on the<br> environment by<br> considering<br> potential<br> pollution<br> risks,<br> minimizing<br> waste and<br> resource<br> consumption,<br> and protecting<br> the local<br> environment |
| --- | --- |
The engineering contractor will be responsible for providing specifications for contract documents, including any specific environmental clauses or conditions.
Principal
contractors
will be
responsible
for appointing
their own EHS
representatives.
These
representatives
will be
responsible
for
implementing
and updating
the
contractor’s
environmental
and social
management
policies and
procedures.
Where selected
contractors do
not have
environmental
policies or
standards that
meet Peak
Gold’s
requirements,
the
engineering,
procurement,
and
contractor’s
environmental
manager will
impose the
Peak Gold
environmental
procedures as
necessary.
| 17.5.4. | PROJECT<br> ALTERNATIVES<br> ANALYSIS |
|---|
The possibility of milling ore on site at Manh Choh rather than trucking it to Fort Knox for milling was assessed as a Project alternative; however, it was determined that onsite milling at Manh Choh would increase GHG emissions by approximately 18% (Boreal Environmental Services 2022). An onsite diesel power generation plant would also be required for onsite processing emitting not only GHGs but other pollutants as well. In addition, based on an impact analysis of identified wetlands, it is also clear that far more wetlands would be potentially affected with an onsite production alternative – 5.1 acres for the proposed ore transport alternative compared to nearly 45 acres for onsite processing due to the requirement of not only milling infrastructure but also a tailings disposal facility. The onsite processing alternative would have more significant environmental impacts in every regard when compared to the ore transport proposal and is therefore not a reasonable or practical alternative.
| 17.6. | LEGAL<br> REQUIREMENTS<br> AND PERMITTING |
|---|---|
| 17.6.1. | ENVIRONMENTAL<br><br><br><br><br><br> PERMITTING<br> REGULATORS |
| --- | --- |
Environmental
permitting,
coordination,
fees, and
compliance for
the Project
and mining
industry in
Alaska is
conducted
through the
following
federal and
state
agencies,
departments,
divisions, and
programs:
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-24 |
|---|

| • | US Army<br> Corps of<br> Engineers<br> (ACOE): Alaska<br> District<br> Regulatory<br> Division;<br> Clean Water<br> Act §404<br> Permitting<br> (wetlands). |
|---|---|
| • | Alaska<br> Department of<br> Natural<br> Resources<br> (ADNR):<br> Division of<br> Mining, Land<br> and Water,<br> Mining<br> Section, Water<br> Resources<br> Section,<br> Office of<br> History and<br> Archaeology |
| --- | --- |
| • | Alaska<br> State Historic<br> Preservation<br> Office (SHPO):<br> Office of<br> Project<br> Management<br> &<br> Permitting,<br> Large Project<br> Coordination |
| --- | --- |
| • | Alaska<br> Department of<br> Environmental<br> Conservation<br> (ADEC):<br> Division of<br> Air Quality,<br> Air Permit<br> Program, Air<br> Compliance<br> Program;<br> Division of<br> Environmental<br> Health,<br> Drinking Water<br> Program, Food<br> Safety &<br> Sanitation<br> Program, Solid<br> Waste Program;<br> Division of<br> Water,<br> Wastewater<br> Discharge<br> Authorization<br> and APDES<br> Program,<br> Mining<br> Section,<br> Engineering<br> Support and<br> Plan Review<br> (septic<br> systems),<br> Storm Water<br> Program, Clean<br> Water Act §401<br> Certification<br> (wetlands);<br> Division of<br> Spill<br> Prevention and<br> Response |
| --- | --- |
| • | Alaska<br> Department of<br> Fish and Game<br> (ADF&G):<br> Habitat<br> Section |
| --- | --- |
| • | Alaska<br> Department of<br> Public Safety<br> (ADPS):<br> Division of<br> Fire and Life<br> Safety |
| --- | --- |
| 17.6.2. | EXISTING<br><br><br><br><br><br> ENVIRONMENTAL<br> APPROVALS |
| --- | --- |
The following current permits were issued to Peak Gold and must be regularly updated:
| • | Clean<br> Water Act §401<br> Certification<br> of Reasonable<br> Assurance.<br> Issued by ADEC<br> on August 14,<br> 2017 and<br> expires on<br> December 31,<br> 2022. |
|---|---|
| • | Wetlands<br><br><br><br><br><br> Fill Permit<br> POA-2023-286.<br> Issued by ACOE<br> on January 5,<br> 2018 and<br> renewed in<br> July, 2022. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Multi-Sector<br><br><br><br><br><br> General Permit<br> for Storm<br> Water<br> Discharges<br> Associated<br> with<br> Industrial<br> Activity<br> Authorization<br> Number<br> AKR06GA93.<br> Issued by ADEC<br> on May 1, 2020<br> and expires on<br> March 31,<br> 2025. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Approved<br><br><br><br><br><br> Reclamation<br> Plan, Approval<br> #2626. Issued<br> by ADNR on<br> February 17,<br> 2021 and<br> expires on<br> December 31,<br> 2025. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Temporary<br><br><br><br><br><br> Water Use<br> Authorization<br> (TWUA)<br> F2020-093.<br> Issued by ADNR<br> on February<br> 18, 2021 and<br> expires on<br> December 31,<br> 2025. |
| --- | --- |
| 17.6.3. | PERMITTING<br><br><br><br><br><br> STRATEGY |
| --- | --- |
In accordance with the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the ACOE is required to prepare either an EA or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) using environmental baseline surveys and public comments. The ACOE’s EA is required by the agency because of the U.S. Clean Water Act (CWA) §404 Wetlands Fill permitting process. The ACOE is the Federal regulatory agency responsible for issuing a §404 Wetlands Fill Permit for the Project.
In September 2022, the Project received a Wetlands Fill Permit under CWA §404, as part of an EA. It appears that the ACOE will prepare an EA based on only 5.2 acres of wetland disturbance and ACOE’s public notice for the CWA §404 Wetlands Fill Permit Application on January 13, 2022. Provided that the ACOE follows through with completion of an EA, the permitting timeframe is estimated to take no more than six to nine months to complete.
The EA will identify and rank all environmental risks, their impact, status, and mitigation strategy. Peak Gold submitted an EID and supporting documents with the CWA §404 Wetlands Fill Permit Application. The EID and supporting documents provide the ACOE with environmental information and data needed to prepare an EA. Numerous permits and approvals are also required at the State level. These are being processed concurrently with the federal wetlands permitting process.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-25 |
|---|

Table 17‑6 summarizes all key permit applications and plans for the Project site.
TABLE 17‑6 RELEVANT PERMITTING STRATEGY AND SCHEDULE SUMMARY
| Permit/License/<br><br> <br>Government<br><br><br><br> Approval | Description | Issuing<br> Agency | Application<br><br><br><br> Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CWA<br> §404 Wetlands<br> Fill Permit | The<br> §404 permit is<br> required<br> before any<br> construction<br> and mining<br> activities can<br> occur on<br> wetlands. | ACOE | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021<br> (permit issued<br> July 2022) |
| CWA<br> §401 Water<br> Quality<br> Certification | The<br> §401 Water<br> Quality<br> Certification<br> approval is<br> required<br> before the<br> §404 permit is<br> issued, and<br> before any<br> construction<br> and mining<br> activities can<br> occur on<br> wetlands. | ADEC | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Waste<br> Management<br> Permit (WMP) | The WMP<br> is required<br> before any<br> mine<br> construction<br> and mining<br> activities can<br> occur. | ADEC | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Reclamation<br><br><br><br> and Closure<br> Plan (RCP) | The RCP<br> (including<br> reclamation<br> costs)<br> approval is<br> required<br> before any<br> mine<br> construction<br> and mining<br> activities can<br> occur. The<br> reclamation<br> cost approval<br> is included<br> with RCP<br> approval. The<br> financial<br> assurance<br> document from<br> Peak Gold must<br> also be<br> provided to<br> Alaska after<br> approval of<br> the RCP. | ADNR<br> & ADEC | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Plan of<br> Operations<br> (POO) | The POO<br> is needed to<br> support the<br> wetlands 404<br> permitting<br> process, WMP<br> permitting<br> process, the<br> RCP approval<br> process and<br> other Alaska<br> regulatory<br> agency<br> permitting<br> processes.<br> Once permits<br> and plan<br> approvals are<br> issued, the<br> POO meets the<br> approval of<br> the regulatory<br> agencies. | ADNR | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Water<br> Appropriation<br> Permits | Water<br> rights for<br> Manh Choh must<br> be in place<br> before water<br> can be used<br> for<br> construction<br> and mining<br> activities. | ADNR | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| APDES<br> Effluent<br> Discharge<br> Permit | An<br> APDES<br> discharge<br> permit is<br> required<br> before any<br> mine water<br> discharge from<br> Manh Choh to<br> Waters of the<br> United States<br> (WOTUS). | ADEC | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Fish<br> Habitat Permit | A Fish<br> Habitat Permit<br> is required<br> before any<br> construction<br> and mining<br> activities<br> occur that may<br> impact fish. | ADF&G | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Air<br> Emissions<br> Title I Minor<br> Permit | The Air<br> Quality<br> Control Minor<br> Permit is<br> required<br> before<br> regulated<br> stationary<br> emission<br> sources can be<br> constructed<br> and placed<br> into service. | ADEC | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-26 | ||
| --- | --- |

| Permit/License/<br><br> <br>Government<br><br><br><br> Approval | Description | Issuing<br><br><br><br> Agency | Application<br><br><br><br> Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| APDES<br> Construction<br> Storm Water<br> Permit | Selected<br><br><br><br> contractor is<br> required to<br> apply for and<br> receive the<br> Construction<br> Storm Water<br> Permit. Peak<br> Gold is a<br> co-permittee<br> and will<br> submit<br> co-permittee<br> application<br> using<br> contractor<br> application<br> information. | ADEC | TBD |
| APDES<br> Multi-Sector<br> General Storm<br> Water Permit<br> (MSGP) | Before<br> mining<br> operations<br> begin, a<br> Notice of<br> Intent (NOI)<br> Modification<br> to the current<br> MSGP<br> #AKR06GA93 for<br> the Manh Choh<br> exploration<br> activities<br> must be<br> submitted that<br> details the<br> projects<br> change from<br> exploration to<br> mining. This<br> includes<br> revising the<br> Project’s<br> SWPPP. | ADEC | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2022 |
| Camp<br> Septic and<br> Leach Field<br> Construction<br> Permit | Septic<br> and leach<br> field<br> construction<br> authorization<br> is required<br> before<br> construction<br> can begin. | ADEC | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Camp<br> Water Well<br> Construction<br> Permit | Water<br> well<br> construction<br> authorization<br> is required<br> before the<br> well is<br> drilled and<br> used as a<br> non-transient,<br> non-community<br> water system. | ADEC | December<br><br><br><br> 31, 2021 |
| Camp<br> Food Service<br> Permit | A food<br> service permit<br> for the camp<br> kitchen and<br> cafeteria is<br> required<br> before food<br> can be<br> prepared and<br> served to<br> personnel. | ADEC | TBD |
| Fuel<br> Island<br> Construction<br> Permit | A<br> construction<br> permit is<br> required<br> before<br> construction<br> of the fuel<br> islands. | ADPS | TBD |
17.6.4. OTHER PERMITS AND APPROVALS
Other permits and approvals that may be required for the Project are summarized in Table 17‑7.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-27 |
|---|

TABLE 17‑7 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL STATE OF ALASKA PERMIT AND AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENTS
| Sector | Permit<br> Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Archaeology<br><br><br><br> and Cultural<br> Heritage | The<br> ACOE has made<br> an Adverse<br> Effect<br> determination<br> regarding the<br> Met Station<br> site TNX-00270<br> (CTA-01). The<br> §404<br> application is<br> being<br> coordinated<br> with SHPO and<br> the Advisory<br> Council on<br> Historic<br> Preservation<br> (ACHP). Any<br> comments SHPO<br> may have<br> concerning<br> presently<br> unknown<br> archaeological<br> or historic<br> data that may<br> be lost or<br> destroyed by<br> work under the<br> requested §404<br> permit will be<br> considered in<br> the ACOE final<br> assessment<br> §404 permit<br> application. | The Met<br> Station site<br> TNX-00270<br> (CTA-01) will<br> be adversely<br> affected by<br> the Project<br> via<br> establishment<br> of the Main<br> WRSA. Peak<br> Gold intends<br> to excavate<br> the site,<br> salvage the<br> prehistoric<br> items within,<br> and turn them<br> over to the<br> Native Village<br> of Tetlin<br> prior to<br> constructing<br> the WRSA. |
| Waste<br> Rock<br> Management | The<br> Waste Rock<br> Management<br> Plan approval<br> by ADEC. | The<br> Waste Rock<br> Management<br> Plan is<br> approved by<br> the issuance<br> of the Waste<br> Management<br> Permit by<br> ADEC. |
| Water<br> Management | The<br> Water<br> Management<br> Plan approval<br> by ADEC. | The<br> Water<br> Management<br> Plan is<br> approved by<br> the issuance<br> of the Waste<br> Management<br> Permit by<br> ADEC. |
| Monitoring | The<br> Monitoring<br> Plan approval<br> by ADEC. | The<br> Monitoring<br> Plan is<br> approved by<br> the issuance<br> of the Waste<br> Management<br> Permit by<br> ADEC. |
| Solid<br> Waste<br> Management | The<br> Solid Waste<br> Management<br> Plan approval<br> by ADEC. | The<br> Solid Waste<br> Management<br> Plan is<br> approved by<br> the issuance<br> of the Waste<br> Management<br> Permit by<br> ADEC. |
Permit
fees are paid
through
Reimbursable
Service
Agreements
\(RSAs\) with
the State of
Alaska.
Permits issued
through the
State of
Alaska
Departments of
Fish and Game,
Natural
Resources and
Environmental
Conservation
are covered by
RSAs.
17.6.4. PERMITTING
RISKS
The Project involves activities for a new greenfield mine on Tetlin private land, and most of the concerns and risks associated with the permitting process are understood and can be anticipated.
The Project’s principal permitting risk was associated with wetland disturbance and the possibility of triggering an EIS under the NEPA instead of an EA. Based on a proactive effort to minimize Project-related impacts to wetlands, an EIS was not required and a wetlands permit was issued in September 2022 as part of an EA of the Project.
Although
not considered
material to
operating
permits, in
response to
public
concerns, the
Department of
Transportation
and Public
Facilities has
funded an
independent
corridor
analysis to
review
potential
impacts of an
increase in
traffic along
the selected
access route.
The Fox
community sits
between
Fairbanks and
Fort Knox in
the final leg
of the
corridor and
is a focus of
concern due to
traffic
increases.
Additionally,
the single
lane Steese
highway near
Fox has tight
curves that
have been
noted by some
community
members as
being unsafe
already,
including the
closest
neighborhood
of Cleary
Summit. The
selected
corridor
analysis
contractor
will work with
the newly
established
Transportation
Advisory
Committee
\(TAC\) that is
being led by a
consultant.
The TAC will
make
recommendations
to the
contractor and
will help
identify areas
of concern.
More
information on
this process
can be found
on the ADOT’s
website
\(Tetlin to
Fort Knox
Corridor,
Transportation
& Public
Facilities,
State of
Alaska\).
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-28 |
|---|

17.7. STAKEHOLDER
AND COMMUNITY
RELATIONS
17.7.1. GOVERNMENT
RELATIONS
Responsible
management of
the state’s
resources is
uniquely
embedded in
the state
constitution
and Alaska is
generally
pro-resource
development,
relying
heavily on
North Slope
oil royalty
revenue to
finance the
state. Many
applicable
government
officials have
expressed
support for
the Project.
Their primary
interest is
the potential
of an economic
boost in a
region that
greatly needs
it. With
a total of 60
legislators,
the Alaska
legislature is
the smallest
bicameral
state
legislature in
the United
States. There
are 20 senate
districts,
each
represented by
a senator
serving a
four-year
term. Each
senate
district
represents two
corresponding
house
districts,
each with a
representative
serving a
two-year term.
There is growing pressure in Alaska by some citizens and elected leaders to target the mining industry with an increase in taxation.
In 2008, the mining industry successfully defeated Ballot Measure 4 (BM4) which threatened the future of the Alaskan mining industry. While the measure initially appeared to focus on the large undeveloped Pebble copper/gold deposit, ultimately, BM4 advocates promoted a mining versus salmon and clean water message. If the measure had passed, it might have impacted existing mines and would have limited the development of future resources. The measure failed in a public vote 57%-43%, with the Alaska native corporations providing key support to the industry.
A subsequent ballot initiative threat, 17FSHB, or Stand for Salmon, was defeated in 2018 – 62% against, 38% for. It is widely accepted by the State of Alaska, all industries, and the native corporations that if enacted, the initiative would have stifled permitting of new and existing projects.
17.7.2. NON-GOVERNMENT
ORGANIZATIONS
AND CIVIL
SOCIETY
ORGANIZATIONS
Kinross
is widely
recognized as
the leader in
responsible
mining in
Alaska. In
recent years,
it has made
major
milestones to
further cement
its standing
as a
sustainability-focused
operator. It
has
successfully
implemented a
robust water
treatment
program and
clean water
discharge
program,
successfully
reclaimed the
True North
mine, which
received much
recognition
from key state
officials and
leaders and
have greatly
enhanced our
partnership
with Trout
Unlimited to
include a new
Alaska
Abandoned Mine
Reclamation
Initiative
that started
in 2021. This
initiative has
been
recognized
nationally as
a model of
true
commitment to
investing in
natural
capital.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-29 |
|---|

Despite
efforts at
early and
transparent
community
outreach, a
group of
community
members has
formed in
opposition to
the Project’s
transportation
plan, largely
citing safety
but shifting
on occasion to
air quality
and noise
concerns. The
group calls
itself the
Advocates for
Safe Alaskan
Highways and
is led by Gary
Wilken, a
former state
senator,
Fairbanks
businessman,
and former
and/or current
board member
of several
statewide
pro-development
boards and
commissions.
The group is
not supportive
of trucking
any ore along
the highway
system,
although the
plan is legal
and requires
no special
permits. The
group has been
advocating
against the
Project with
legislators,
the Borough
Assembly, and
the public
largely
through
letters to the
editor or
social media.
In response to public concerns, the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities has funded an independent corridor analysis to review potential impacts of an increase in corridor traffic. The selected corridor analysis contractor will work with the newly established TAC that is being led by a consultant. The TAC will make recommendations to the contractor and will help identify areas of concern. This group is made up of mine advocates, leadership from Alaska Native villages
along the
route, other
local
government
representatives,
emergency fire
and rescue
personnel,
tourism
representatives,
local school
districts, and
government
agencies,
including the
Department of
Environmental
Conservation,
Department of
Public Safety,
Federal
Highway
Administration,
and Federal
Motor Carrier
Group. More
information on
this process,
including
committee
member
biographies,
corridor
analysis
details,
meeting
announcements
and notes, and
Frequently
Asked
Questions can
be found on
the ADOT’s
website \(Tetlin
to Fort Knox
Corridor,
Transportation
& Public
Facilities,
State of
Alaska\).
17.7.3. BUSINESS
ORGANIZATIONS
An early, positive relationship has been established with the Tok Chamber of Commerce, and KGMA continues to maintain regular, proactive contact. The Chamber sponsored a Tok community meeting in December 2020 to provide an opportunity for the site to give a Project update, and they have publicly supported and/or co-hosted community meetings and events since then. This partnership with the Chamber will be critical as KGMA continues to work with them to develop a local business registry and future initiatives, such as local contractor fairs, to support area businesses.
17.7.4. MEDIA
Upon announcement of the Peak Gold acquisition on October 7, 2020, media coverage was far-reaching and included both written and broadcast means. In general, the initial coverage was informational and positive, citing that the Project will “strengthen [Kinross’] medium-term production and cash flow profile” as a result of the Project. Tetlin Chief Michal Sam was quoted as stating, “We look forward to the safe and responsible development of the project and the positive benefits it is expected to generate for our community. We also look forward to further building a relationship with Kinross, a company with a strong track record in Alaska, and are pleased to see further investment plans for the project.”
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-30 |
|---|

Local media continues to be supportive or neutral regarding the Project, especially the local newspaper (Fairbanks Daily News Miner). In Q1 2022, there was a sharp increase in Letters to the Editor relating to the Project, following a well-attended Fairbanks public meeting. Letters mostly expressed concerns around the ore transportation plan. However, there were also letters in support of the Project, and the newspaper itself expressed its support for the Project. All media related to the Project is tracked and documented in SharePoint.
1.1.1. COMMUNITY
VIEWS AND
CONCERNS
The Manh Choh community relations team maintains a community and stakeholder database. As previously mentioned, the Project is located on lands leased from the Tetlin Village Council, a traditional Upper Tanana Athabascan community. The village chief and council represent the people and are re-elected every four years, with the most recent election held in 2019.
Interior
Alaska
continues to
be supportive
of mining and
is cognizant
of its
mining-rich
history. The
most recent
Council of
Alaska
Producers
\(CAP\) Public
Perception
study
indicates that
75% of
interior
Alaska
residents
support
mining, 82%
believe that
it is crucial
that Alaska
continues to
be a leader in
mineral
investment,
and 91%
believe that
mining is an
important
sector to
Alaska’s
economy.
However, the
continued and
growing public
opposition to
the Pebble
project, and
other
indicators
suggest that
the support
for new mines
in Alaska has
much decreased
in recent
years. There
is, without
question, a
growing
disconnect
between the
growing need
and demand for
minerals and a
basic
understanding
of the
importance of
extracting
minerals
domestically,
where people
and
environment-first
practices are
paramount.
The local area of Tok and surrounding areas, including the Native Village of Tetlin, have expressed support for the Project in numerous engagements, community meetings, public testimony, and in letter form. The local communities see great value in the Project to include hope and opportunities that could be generationally impactful. They also expect that the Project will maximize opportunities for local employment and local business, operate in a safe and environmentally responsible manner, properly maintain the tribal road impacted by increased traffic, and respect the desire to maintain cultural and subsistence ways of life.
The current ore transport plan anticipates that the ore trucks will depart from the Manh Choh mine site and will end at the Fort Knox mill for processing, traveling approximately 240 miles on 90% public roadways along the Alaska, Richardson, and Steese highways. The route will pass through the communities of Tok, Delta Junction, Salcha, North Pole, Fairbanks, and Fox. Two smaller lakeside communities that the corridor will pass by, but not through, are Harding Lake and Birch Lake. Public meetings have been held in communities along the route, either virtually or in-person, to provide information and listen to community concerns.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-31 |
|---|

The Fox community sits between Fairbanks and Fort Knox in the final leg of the corridor and is a focus of concern due to traffic increases. Additionally, the single lane Steese highway near Fox has tight curves that have been noted by some community members as being unsafe already, including the closest neighborhood of Cleary Summit. When nearby satellite deposit True North was still being mined, some Cleary Summit neighbors were very vocal and oppositional during ore transport on the mine access road. In 2022, the Fort Knox formally established a Community Advisory Committee, comprised of local residents and organizations that are geographically located near the mine and meet quarterly. The group has met multiple times and has held a specific meeting on ore transport to establish open communication and transparency. Many of those group’s members have safety concerns about additional commercial traffic along this portion of the corridor.
For those communities concerned about ore transport, however, they have cited concerns including traffic congestion, passing vehicles, school bus stops, bridge infrastructure,
adverse
weather
conditions,
impacts on
roadways, and
cost of
maintenance.
Based on the business context, company goals, and through listening to stakeholder groups, the priorities for engagement are:
| • | Broad<br> local support<br> through jobs,<br> training,<br> educational<br> opportunities,<br> and<br> infrastructure |
|---|---|
| • | Managing<br><br><br><br> expectations<br> and the<br> reality of a<br> short mine<br> life |
| --- | --- |
| • | Investing<br><br><br><br> in a sustained<br> relationship<br> strategy |
| --- | --- |
| • | Understanding<br><br><br><br> and mitigating<br> the impact of<br> trucking ore<br> through<br> communities<br> 240 miles from<br> the mine site<br> to Fort Knox |
| --- | --- |
| • | Communicating<br><br><br><br> with<br> stakeholders<br> who have<br> traffic and<br> safety<br> concerns |
| --- | --- |
| • | Participating<br><br><br><br> closely with<br> the ADOT’s<br> Transportation<br> Advisory<br> Committee/working<br> group and<br> Community<br> Advisory<br> Committees to<br> better<br> understand<br> transportation<br> concerns and<br> explore<br> mitigation<br> solutions |
| --- | --- |
| • | Supporting<br><br><br><br> the landowner<br> in<br> preparations<br> to manage<br> expected<br> royalty income |
| --- | --- |
| • | Honoring<br><br><br><br> and respecting<br> Alaska Native<br> traditions,<br> culture,<br> subsistence,<br> and ways of<br> life |
| --- | --- |
| • | Maintaining<br><br><br><br> access, as it<br> is safe to do<br> so, to the<br> Project site<br> and<br> exploration<br> areas,<br> crossing<br> leased<br> community<br> lands |
| --- | --- |
17.7.5. NEIGHBORING
INDIGENOUS
COMMUNITIES
There are additional neighboring villages on or near the road system from Delta to Tok, which include the communities of Dot Lake, Healy Lake, Mentasta, Northway, and Tanacross. These villages are like Tetlin in many ways, however, unlike Tetlin, they opted in to ANCSA and benefit from revenue sharing between native corporations embedded in Alaska’s unique structure.
The Tetlin Native Corporation is a separate entity, formed at the time when Tetlin village decided not to incorporate.
All villages have a seat on the Tanana Chief’s Conference (TCC), the regional native group. TCC works on issues of shared interest and manages services such as healthcare and workforce development and training.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-32 |
|---|

Indigenous
representatives
are listed on
the Manh Choh
comprehensive,
internal, key
community
list. This
list is
updated
regularly and
reviewed
quarterly to
reflect any
changes in
stakeholder
sentiment,
interest, or
influence.
17.7.6. STAKEHOLDER
AND COMMUNITY
RELATIONS
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
The goal of the stakeholder and community management strategy is to build and maintain solid, broad support for the Project through specific engagement plans in the key areas of government relations, community relations, media relations and communications.
Kinross has a
long history
of positive
community and
government
relations in
interior
Alaska.
The stakeholder engagement strategy is the site’s integrated approach to building good relationships with its stakeholders. Through the engagement plan, the site interacts with stakeholders on the full range of topics including impacts both positive and negative, resolving complaints or grievances, managing risk, and implementing donations and community projects.
The political climate of Alaska is favorable to mining, and key external stakeholders in the Project include:
| • | regulatory<br><br><br><br> authorities |
|---|---|
| • | Alaska<br> native tribes<br> and<br> corporations |
| --- | --- |
| • | national,<br><br><br><br> regional and<br> local<br> government<br> authorities |
| --- | --- |
| • | Non-Government<br><br><br><br> Organizations<br> (NGOs) and<br> conservation<br> groups |
| --- | --- |
| • | local<br> communities |
| --- | --- |
| • | business<br><br><br><br> communities |
| --- | --- |
| • | media<br> organizations |
| --- | --- |
Within
each cluster,
key people and
groups have
been
identified and
there is
continuous
stakeholder
engagement
with each of
these groups,
targeted at
their areas of
interest. KGMA
has engaged
with
authorities
and community
members to
discuss the
Project and
address
concerns
relative to
potential
impacts.
During 2020 to
the second
quarter of
2022, the
Project
engaged with
the Tetlin
Village
Council,
Tanana Chiefs
through a
conference,
the Tok Native
Association
and numerous
stakeholders
such as the
Advocates for
Safe Alaskan
Highways,
Alaska Miner’s
Association,
Alaska Gateway
School
district,
Alaska
Resource
Education,
Greater
Fairbanks
Chamber of
Commerce,
Resource
Development
Council, the
Northway, Fox,
Mentasta and
Delta
communities,
Fort Knox
Community
Advisory
Committee, and
with
government
departments
such as the
Department of
Transport,
Alaska State
Troopers, US
Forest
Service, among
others. In
addition, many
individual
community
members were
regularly
engaged.
A community engagement plan has been in place since 2021 and details an estimated consultation schedule for all key stakeholders in alignment with key internal targets such as contractor/employee trainings, baseline studies, newsletters, etc. The plan outlines meeting frequency, purpose, site lead, and resources needed, both internal and external. Documentation of each of these engagements is maintained on the Manh Choh internal SharePoint site, to include (when available) meeting minutes, sign-in sheets, announcements, and photographs.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-33 |
|---|

Communication
methods and
tools
developed
include social
media
channels,
distributed
newsletters,
local news
outlets and a
project
website. The
website www.manhchoh.com
acts as a hub
of information
for
stakeholders
to reference
and utilize to
connect with
the Project
team. The site
hosts
information
regarding jobs
interest,
vendor
interest,
FAQs, and
Project
updates. The
ADOT also has
a website to
provide
updates and
information on
the TAC and
the
third-party
Corridor
Analysis \(Tetlin
to Fort Knox
Corridor,
Transportation
& Public
Facilities,
State of
Alaska\).
17.8. MINE CLOSURE PLANNING
Mine site reclamation and closure will be performed in accordance with the Manh Choh Project Reclamation and Closure Plan (RCP). The RCP was originally submitted for approval to ADNR and ADEC in December 2021 and was subsequently updated and re-submitted in January 2022. The RCP includes a closure cost estimate prepared using Alaska’s Standardized Reclamation Cost Estimator (SRCE) model, which was used for calculating the financial assurance amount (bond) required by ADNR and ADEC. The SRCE model estimated a financial assurance requirement of approximately $63.5 million. Contango’s attributable ownership portion of the financial assurance requirement is approximately $19.1 million, or as may be amended in the future. The public comment period for the revised (January 2022) RCP ended March 13, 2023 and approval of the revised RCP is expected approximately May 2023.
17.9. QUALIFIED
PERSON’S
OPINION ON
ENVIRONMENTAL
COMPLIANCE,
PERMITTING,
AND LOCAL
INDIVIDUALS OR
GROUPS
In the QP’s opinion, the current plans related to environmental compliance, permitting, and local individuals or groups are reasonable for this level of study.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 17-34 |
|---|

- CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS
18.1. CAPITAL COSTS
Table 18‑1 provides a summary of the Project capital cost estimate. All capital costs are presented on a 100% JV basis.
TABLE 18‑1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT CAPITAL COSTS
| WBS | Description | Manh<br> Choh ($M) | Fort<br> Knox Mill<br><br> <br>Modifications<br><br> <br>($M) | Manh<br> Choh +<br><br> Fort Knox Mill<br><br> Modifications<br><br> ($M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | General<br> Contracts | - | $2.7 | $2.7 |
| 20 | Mining<br> & Mobile<br> Equipment | $4.7 | $2.5 | $7.2 |
| 30 | Site<br> Development | $77.4 | $3.2 | $80.6 |
| 40 | Process<br> Facilities | - | $22.2 | $22.2 |
| 50 | Tailings | - | $2.6 | $2.6 |
| 80 | Indirect<br><br><br><br> Capital Costs | $18.8 | $12.0 | $30.8 |
| 89 | Contingency<br><br><br><br> &<br> Escalation | $14.0 | $6.4 | $20.4 |
| Sub-total<br><br><br><br> Initial<br> Capital Costs | $114.9 | $51.6 | $166.5 | |
| Pre-Production<br><br><br><br> General and<br> Administrative<br> (G&A) | $12.9 | |||
| Administration<br><br><br><br> (JV Management<br> Fee) | $6.4 | |||
| Highway<br> Ore Transport | $33.6 | |||
| Pre-Production<br><br><br><br> Capitalized<br> Stripping | $21.4 | |||
| Total<br> Capital Costs | $240.8 |
18.1.1. DIRECT CAPITAL COSTS
Direct
Capital Costs
\(DCC\) cover
the costs of
primary and
ancillary
access roads,
mine camp, ore
stockpile and
loadout area,
contact and
surface water
management,
water
treatment
plant, mine
facilities,
primary power
generation,
process
facilities,
tailings, and
other enabling
infrastructure
costs.
The estimate of DCC is quantitative-based and includes all the materials, equipment, supplies, and labor associated with the construction of the permanent facilities. Material takeoffs of quantities were developed from design drawings, developed to a level of definition appropriate to a feasibility study.
DCC are based upon on competitive firm bids or budgetary estimates received from contractors and vendors. All competitive firm bids and budgetary costs were reviewed by KGMA and the Project team before incorporation into the capital cost estimate.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 18-1 |
|---|

Equipment
and material
supply cost
estimates
include
shipping and
freight costs
but no
installation
costs.
Construction
and
installation
cost estimates
include all
costs for
required craft
labor,
construction
equipment,
contractor
direct
supervision,
materials,
supplies, and
supporting
costs.
As shown in Table 18‑1, total DCC for the Project (100% Peak Gold JV basis) are $82.1 million, excluding contingency. Total DCC for Manh Choh and Fort Knox Mill modifications are $115.3 million, excluding contingency.
18.1.2. INDIRECT
CAPITAL COSTS
Indirect
Capital Costs
\(ICC\) include
Owner’s Costs,
Engineering
and
Procurement,
Indirect
Construction
Costs,
operations
overheads,
freight and
duties not
included in
DCC, warehouse
inventory,
contingency,
escalation,
and KGMA’s
Management
Reserve
allowance.
KGMA
Management
Reserve
amounts have
been excluded
from the
Contango-only
economic
analysis in
this report.
As shown in Table 18‑1, total ICC for the Project (100% Peak Gold JV basis) are $18.8 million, excluding contingency. Total ICC for Manh Choh and Fort Knox Mill modification are $30.8 million, excluding contingency.
18.1.3. SUSTAINING
CAPITAL COSTS
LOM sustaining capital costs for the Project total approximately $75.8 million and include $20.1 million for equipment and machinery and $55.8 million allocated to capitalized waste.
18.1.4. CLOSURE COSTS
The Manh Choh Project Reclamation and Closure Plan (RCP), dated December 2021, includes an estimated closure cost of $63.5 million, which was prepared using the Alaska SRCE model.
18.2. OPERATING
COSTS
Project
operating
costs have
been estimated
by KGMA either
through
bottom-up
estimating
methods or
from budgetary
quotations.
The base date
of the
operating cost
estimate is Q1
2022 and is
considered to
have an
accuracy of
±10%.
The operating cost estimate includes all site-related operating costs associated with mining ore to produce gold bars. The operating cost estimate does not include costs associated with downstream transport, marketing of products, or corporate overheads.
Table 18‑2 summarizes LOM average unit operating costs by primary cost category. Operating costs are presented on a 100% Peak Gold JV basis.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 18-2 |
|---|

TABLE 18‑2 LOM UNIT OPERATING COSTS
| Operating<br><br><br><br> Cost | Unit | LOM<br> Average Unit<br> Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Mining | US$/t<br> mined^1^ | 5.97 |
| Processing | US$/t<br> milled | 52.26 |
| G&A | US$/t<br> milled | 18.47 |
| Ore<br> Haul^2^ | US$/t<br> milled | 63.39 |
^1^Includes capitalized stripping and includes WTI oil adjustment.
^2^Includes initial cost of highway trucks amortized across mine life and includes fuel cost based on $3.00/gal.
Fuel costs have been estimated assuming a WTI oil price of US$80/bbl, which equates to a fuel price of US$3.26/gallon.
Mining
costs are
based on
competitive
bids obtained
from
contractors
and bottom-up
estimation of
costs such as
fuel and
explosives
consumption.
The mining
cost is based
on a December
2021
contractor
quotation and
has been
escalated by
5% to bring it
to the
estimate base
date.
Processing
costs are
estimated in
accordance
with the Toll
Milling
Agreement
framework
outlined in
the JV
agreement.
G&A
costs are
based on
bottom-up
estimation
methods,
competitive
bids, and
factoring of
Fort Knox
budgets.
Ore haul costs are based on negotiated contract terms with the selected haulage contractor with highway trucks and fuel supplied by the JV.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 18-3 |
|---|

ECONOMIC
ANALYSIS
The economic analysis contained in this TRS is based on Contango’s 30% attributable ownership interest in Manh Choh Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves.
Economic
assumptions
and capital
and operating
costs in this
analysis are
based on the
Manh Choh FS
and FS
economic
update
prepared by
KGMA for the
Peak Gold JV.
All costs are expressed without allowance for escalation or currency fluctuation in United States dollars (US$) with a H1 2022 cost basis and assume a West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil price of US$80 per barrel.
The economic analysis is presented in metric units of measure.
A summary of key inputs for the analysis is provided below.
19.1.1. PHYSICALS
| • | Physicals<br><br><br><br> (mineable ore<br> inventory): | Equal<br> to Contango’s<br> 30%<br> attributable<br> ownership interest<br><br><br><br> in Manh Choh<br> Probable<br> Mineral<br> Reserves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | Mine<br> life: | 4.6<br> years (between<br> years 2024 and<br> 2028) | |
| • | Open<br> pit operations | ||
| o | Open<br> pit mine life: | 4.6<br> years | |
| o | Total<br> ore tonnes<br> mined: | 1.18 Mt<br> at 7.9 g/t Au<br> and 13.6 g/t<br> Ag | |
| o | Waste<br> tonnes: | 13.7 Mt | |
| o | Maximum<br> mining rate: | 13,023<br> tpd (ore and<br> waste) in year<br> 2024 | |
| • | Processing<br><br><br><br> of Mineral<br> Reserves: | ||
| o | Total<br> Ore Feed to<br> Plant: | 1.18 Mt | |
| ◾Gold<br> grade: | 7.9 g/t<br> Au | ||
| ◾Silver<br> grade: | 13.6<br> g/t Ag | ||
| ◾Maximum<br><br><br><br> milling rate: | 13,200<br> tpd (ore will<br> be processed<br> on a batch <br><br> basis<br> approximately<br> four times a<br> year) | ||
| o | Contained<br> Metal | ||
| ◾Gold: | 299,143<br> oz | ||
| ◾Silver: | 515,571<br> oz | ||
| o | Average<br> LOM Plant<br> Recovery | ||
| ◾Gold | 90.3% | ||
| ◾Silver | 69.2% | ||
| o | Recovered<br><br><br><br> Metal | ||
| ◾Gold: | 269,971<br> oz | ||
| ◾Silver: | 356,819<br> oz | ||
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 19-1 | ||
| --- | --- |

19.1.2. REVENUE
| • | Revenue<br> stated in this<br> section of the<br> TRS only<br> considers<br> Contango’s 30%<br> interest in<br> Peak Gold JV. |
|---|---|
| • | Revenue<br> is estimated<br> over the LOM<br> based on<br> Contango’s<br> corporate<br> guidance<br> prices from<br> January 2023<br> on a real<br> basis, with a<br> flat long-term<br> price of<br> $1,600/oz Au<br> and $22.00/oz<br> Ag,<br> respectively. <br> The QP<br> considers<br> these prices<br> to be aligned<br> with the<br> current<br> industry<br> standards. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Payable<br> metals are<br> estimated at<br> 99.9% for gold<br> and 99.0% for<br> silver. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Refinery<br><br><br><br> charges are<br> estimated to<br> be as follows: |
| --- | --- |
| o | Doré<br> transportation<br> shipments:<br> 15,000 oz per<br> shipment. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Doré<br> shipment<br> costs: $10,000<br> per shipment. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Refining<br><br><br><br> charges:<br> $5.00/oz Au<br> and $0.50/oz<br> Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| • | After<br> transportation<br> and refining<br> charges, LOM<br> Net Smelter<br> Returns (NSR)<br> of<br> approximately<br> $437 million. |
| --- | --- |
19.1.3. CAPITAL COSTS
| • | A<br> summary of the<br> Project<br> capital costs<br> included in<br> the economic<br> analysis is<br> provided in<br> Table 19‑1. |
|---|
TABLE 19‑1 PROJECT CAPITAL COSTS
| Description | Units | Peak<br> Gold JV<br><br> <br>(100%<br> basis) | Contango^1^<br><br> <br>(30%<br> portion) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial<br> Capital Costs<br> for Project<br> Construction | $<br> million | 189.4 | 56.8 |
| Capitalized<br><br><br><br> Waste<br> Development -<br> Initial | $<br> million | 25.9 | 7.8 |
| Sustaining<br><br><br><br> Capital Costs | $<br> million | 20.1 | 6.0 |
| Capitalized<br><br><br><br> Waste<br> Development -<br> Sustaining | $<br> million | 55.8 | 16.7 |
| Salvage<br> Value | $<br> million | 11.5 | 3.5 |
| Closure/Reclamation<br><br><br><br> Capital | $<br> million | 105.6 | 31.7 |
Note:
- Excludes approximately $52 million in capital costs allocated to Fort Knox (captured in Toll Milling costs).
19.1.4. OPERATING
COSTS
| • | Operating<br><br><br><br> costs<br> summarized<br> below are LOM<br> average values<br> and are based<br> on Contango’s<br> 30% interest<br> in the Peak<br> Gold JV. |
|---|---|
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 19-2 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Open<br> pit mining: |
|---|---|
| • | Capitalized<br><br><br><br> waste<br> development: |
| • | Ore<br> haulage: |
| • | Processing<br><br><br><br> (toll<br> milling): |
| • | General<br> and<br> Administrative<br> (G&A): |
| • | Total<br> unit operating<br> costs: |
| • | LOM<br> total<br> operating<br> costs: |
| • | JV<br> Management<br> fee: In<br> addition to<br> site operating<br> costs, there<br> is a JV<br> Management Fee<br> charged by<br> Peak Gold to<br> the JV<br> partners for<br> running the<br> site and<br> operations.<br> The fee is a<br> percentage<br> charge of<br> applicable<br> Project costs<br> as specified<br> in the JV<br> Agreement. The<br> fee varies<br> between a 3%<br> charge during<br> pre-production<br> and a 2%<br> charge during<br> the operations<br> period. The JV<br> Management Fee<br> for Contango’s<br> 30% interest<br> totals<br> approximately<br> 5.4 million<br> over the LOM. |
All values are in US Dollars.
19.1.5.
TAXATION
AND ROYALTIES
| • | The<br> Project is<br> subject to the<br> following<br> royalties: |
|---|---|
| o | Production<br><br><br><br> royalty with<br> the Native<br> Village of<br> Tetlin. When<br> production is<br> achieved, Peak<br> Gold will<br> begin paying<br> the Tetlin<br> Council a<br> production<br> royalty less<br> all advanced<br> royalty<br> payments and<br> the $450,000<br> “buy up”<br> payment. The<br> current<br> production<br> royalty for<br> gold, silver,<br> platinum,<br> palladium,<br> rhodium,<br> ruthenium,<br> osmium,<br> iridium, or<br> any other<br> precious<br> metals or gems<br> to the Native<br> Village of<br> Tetlin per<br> Lease is: |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 3.0%<br> NSR royalty on<br> the first four<br> years of<br> full-scale<br> production |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 4.0%<br> NSR royalty on<br> the fifth,<br> sixth, and<br> seventh years<br> of full-scale<br> production |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 5.0%<br> NSR royalty on<br> the eighth and<br> subsequent<br> years of<br> full-scale<br> production |
| --- | --- |
| • | Production<br><br><br><br> royalty to<br> Royal Gold,<br> Inc.,<br> comprising: |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 3.0%<br> NSR royalty on<br> the Lease |
| --- | --- |
| ◾ | 28% NSR<br> royalty on<br> silver from<br> the Lease |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> mining<br> industry pays<br> an Alaska<br> corporate<br> income tax of<br> up to 9.4% of<br> income, which<br> is the same<br> for all<br> corporations<br> in the state.<br> The mining<br> industry also<br> pays up to 7%<br> of net profits<br> as an<br> additional<br> mining license<br> tax, which<br> applies to all<br> mining<br> operations,<br> including<br> royalty<br> owners,<br> regardless of<br> size, land<br> status,<br> mineral<br> ownership, or<br> location. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The QP<br> has relied on<br> Grant Thornton<br> LLP<br> (Contango’s<br> tax adviser)<br> for the<br> calculation of<br> income and<br> mining taxes<br> applicable to<br> the economic<br> analysis. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 19-3 |
| --- | --- |

19.1.6. CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
The QP has reviewed the Manh Choh FS financial model (100% Peak Gold JV basis) prepared by KGMA (Kinross Model) and Contango’s own unlevered after-tax cash flow model for Contango’s 30% interest in the Project (Contango Model).
Project
economics in
the Contango
Model have
been evaluated
using the
discounted
cash flow
method and
considering
annual
processed
tonnages and
grade of ore.
The QP
reviewed the
Contango Model
and its
assumptions
for metal
prices,
metallurgical
recoveries,
operating
costs,
refining and
transportation
charges, and
initial and
sustaining
capital
expenditures
and finds them
to be
reasonable.
Annual
cash flow
model results
are presented
in Section 19
of the TRS
with no
allowance for
inflation.
At a 5% discount rate, results include a pre-tax and after-tax net present value (NPV) of approximately $49 million and $30 million, respectively. The QP is of the opinion that the application of a 5% discount rate for after-tax cash flow discounting of a precious metals Project in a politically stable region is reasonable and appropriate.
The economic analysis confirms that Contango’s 30% interest in Project Mineral Reserves is economically viable at the assumed metal prices.
Undiscounted
pre-tax cash
flows total
approximately
$71 million
and
undiscounted
after-tax cash
flows total
approximately
$46 million.
The Project’s internal rate of return (IRR) is defined as the discount rate that results in a Project NPV equal to zero. The Project’s pre-tax IRR is approximately 31% and the Project’s after-tax IRR is approximately 23%.
The World Gold Council Adjusted Operating Cost (AOC) on a Gold Equivalent (AuEq) basis is $899 per AuEq oz. The LOM sustaining capital cost is $218 per AuEq oz, for an All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) of $1,116 per AuEq oz. Contango’s portion of annual gold sales is approximately 58,402oz per year from 2024 to 2028.
Table 19‑2 presents a summary of the Contango Model cash flow results.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 19-4 |
|---|

TABLE 19‑2 ANNUAL CASH FLOW MODEL

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 19-5 |
|---|


| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 19-6 |
|---|

19.1.7. SENSITIVITY
ANALYSIS
Project
risks can be
identified in
both economic
and
non-economic
terms. Key
economic risks
were examined
by running
cash flow
sensitivities
on after-tax
NPV at a 5%
discount
rate. The
following
parameters
were examined:
| • | Gold<br> head grade |
|---|---|
| • | Gold<br> metallurgical<br> recovery |
| --- | --- |
| • | Gold<br> metal price |
| --- | --- |
| • | Operating<br><br><br><br> costs |
| --- | --- |
| • | Capital<br> costs<br> (initial,<br> sustaining,<br> salvage, and<br> closure) |
| --- | --- |
After-tax
sensitivities
have been
calculated for
-20% to +20%
variations for
gold grade,
and gold
price, -6% to
+6% variations
for gold
recovery, and
-5% to +15%
for operating
costs and
capital costs
to determine
the most
sensitive
parameter of
the Project.
The
sensitivities
are presented
in Table 19‑3.
TABLE 19‑3 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY
| Variance<br><br><br><br> From Base Case | Head<br> Grade<br><br> (g/t<br> Au) | NPV at<br> 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
|---|---|---|
| -20% | 6.30 | (24.1) |
| -10% | 7.09 | 5.2 |
| 0% | 7.88 | 29.7 |
| 10% | 8.67 | 54.0 |
| 20% | 9.46 | 76.9 |
| Variance<br><br><br><br> From Base Case | Recovery<br><br> (% Au) | NPV at<br> 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
| -6% | 85.3% | 16.2 |
| -3% | 87.6% | 22.6 |
| 0% | 90.3% | 29.7 |
| 3% | 92.8% | 36.5 |
| 6% | 95.1% | 42.9 |
| Variance<br><br><br><br> From Base Case | Metal<br> Prices<br><br> (US$/oz<br> Au) | NPV at<br> 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
| -20% | $1,280 | (24.4) |
| -10% | $1,440 | 5.1 |
| 0% | $1,600 | 29.7 |
| 10% | $1,760 | 54.1 |
| 20% | $1,920 | 77.1 |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 19-7 | |
| --- | --- |

| Variance<br><br><br><br> From Base Case | Operating<br><br><br><br> Costs<br><br> (US$/t) | NPV at<br> 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
|---|---|---|
| -5% | $174 | 35.9 |
| -2,5% | $179 | 32.8 |
| 0% | $183 | 29.7 |
| 7.5% | $197 | 20.5 |
| 15% | $211 | 11.2 |
| Variance<br><br><br><br> From Base Case | Capital<br> Costs<br><br> (US$<br> 000) | NPV at<br> 5%<br><br> (US$ M) |
| -5% | $109,777 | 34.7 |
| -2,5% | $112,666 | 32.2 |
| 0% | $115,554 | 29.7 |
| 7.5% | $124,221 | 22.3 |
| 15% | $132,888 | 14.9 |
A comparison of results for the various sensitivity cases using after-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate are presented in Figure 19‑1.
FIGURE 19‑1 AFTER-TAX NPV AT 5% SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The
Project is
most sensitive
to changes in
metal prices,
head grade and
metallurgical
recoveries,
followed by
operating
costs and then
capital costs.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 19-8 |
|---|

ADJACENT
PROPERTIES
There are three adjacent properties located immediately north and west of the Tetlin Lease; Triple Z, Hona, and Eagle, including the Tok Option Block (Table 20‑1, Figure 20‑1).
TABLE 20‑1 CONTANGO’S 100% OWNED STATE MINING CLAIMS
| Property | Location | Commodities | Claims | Acres | Type | Contango<br><br> <br>Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triple<br> Z | Eastern<br> Interior | Gold,<br> Copper | 95 | 14,810 | State<br> Mining Claims | 100% |
| Hona | Eastern<br> Interior | Gold,<br> Copper | 482 | 74,310 | State<br> Mining Claims | 100% |
| Eagle | Eastern<br> Interior | Gold,<br> Copper | 396 | 64,900 | State<br> Mining Claims | 100% |
| Tok<br> Option Block | Eastern<br> Interior | Gold,<br> Copper | 159 | 12,890 | State<br> Mining Claims | 100%<br> now, 30%<br><br> <br>after<br> option* |
| Totals | 1,132 | 166,910 |
Note. Peak Gold JV has the option to purchase the Tok Option Block.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 20-1 |
|---|

FIGURE
20‑1
CONTANGO’S
100% OWNED
STATE MINING
CLAIMS

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 20-2 |
|---|

20.1. TRIPLE Z
The Triple Z claims were staked in 2009 and the claim block expanded in 2011 and again in 2019, and now covers an area of 14,810 acres immediately adjacent to the Alaska Highway to the south and west, and the Taylor Highway to the north and east. The Alaska Resource Data Files (ARDF) indicate that the Triple Z prospect received limited surface exploration in 1970 and Cities Service Minerals Corp. completed three drill holes on the prospect in 1971. No technical details from this work are available in the public domain. Inquiries with Kinross, the assumed current owner of the 1970s work, indicate that these records have not survived.
The area was identified as prospective for porphyry copper-gold-silver-molybdenum mineralization based on regional government sponsored stream sediment sampling. Several dozer trenches were discovered on the west side of the prospect during 2009 field investigations shortly after staking the claims. Eighty-two surface rock and 115 soil samples were collected in 2009. Follow-up auger soil sampling completed between 2009 and 2011 identified a large-scale copper-gold-silver-molybdenum anomaly centered along a low-profile ridge with little to no outcrop. An airborne magnetic and resistivity survey conducted over the area in 2011 showed a coincident magnetic low and resistivity high (classic porphyry signatures) over the geochemically anomalous area. A follow-up IP survey conducted in 2019 across four orthogonal lines outlined multiple IP anomalies broadly coincident with the soil and magnetic/resistivity anomalies.
To date the main targets have not yet been drilled because a land transfer is yet to be completed between the Federal Government (Bureau of Land Management – BLM) and the State of Alaska. This is part of a process that has been ongoing since Statehood. Contango has been working with the State and Federal agencies to prioritize this transfer because of the highly prospective drill-ready target. Drilling was completed in 2012 (before the IP survey) with six core holes drilled to depths ranging from 230 m (755 ft) to 380 m (1,246 ft). Holes 1202 and 1204 encountered several zones of anomalous copper, gold, and silver.
The best results were obtained in hole 1203 which intersected 27.3 m (90 ft) grading 0.129% Cu, 11.5 g/t Ag, and 0.129 g/t Au starting at 275.5 m (902 ft), and 9.3 m (30.5 ft) grading 0.146% Cu, 17.4 g/t Ag, and 0.163 g/t Au starting at 306.3 m (1,005 ft). Holes 1204, 1205, and 1206 contained narrow intervals of anomalous precious metals with lead and zinc – typical mineralization seen in the distal portions of a porphyry system. Once the land transfer is completed, Contango plans to drill this well-defined porphyry copper-gold-silver-molybdenum target.
20.2. HONA
The Hona prospect is located immediately south and west of the Eagle block and there is an arbitrary separation of the two large claim blocks. The Hona block was staked in 2016 and is centered around a series of prospects generally referred to as Hona but also known as the Noah or Natahona prospects. The prospect currently is accessible via helicopter but is within 10 km of the State maintained all-weather Tok Cut-off to Glenn Highway #1. The prospect sits at elevations ranging from 914 MASL (3,000 ft) to 2,036 MASL (6,680 ft) centered on VABM Hona. The prospect was originally identified and drilled by Kennecott Exploration Company (Kennecott) during 1997 and 1998.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 20-3 |
|---|

Kennecott
drill three
holes for a
total of 885 m
\(2,904 ft\) for
which no
published
results are
available.
Later
follow-up
logging
demonstrated
that the holes
intersected
narrow
high-grade
zones of gold
and associated
metals
analyzed by a
Niton Portable
XRF unit.
Follow-up
sampling in
the area
included a
regional scale
stream
sediment and
pan
concentrate
program which
outlined
several broad
areas of
anomalous gold
and associated
pathfinder
elements and
included some
particularly
high pan
concentrate
samples
containing 1
g/t Au to 9
g/t Au in
multiple
samples from
upper Hona
Creek and 9
Gram Creek.
Rock sampling
of mineralized
skarn areas
identified
gold rich
skarn
mineralization
with samples
containing 4
g/t Au to 14
g/t Au.
Figure
20‑2 shows the
geology,
location of
prospects,
geophysical
surveys, and
drilling at
Hona.
FIGURE 20‑2 HONA GEOLOGY, PROSPECTS, DRILL HOLES AND GEOPHYSICS

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 20-4 |
|---|

Early in 2017, the Hona prospect and adjacent lands were evaluated using Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer - Short Wave Infrared (ASTER-SWIR) processing and interpretation.
The resulting imagery indicated widespread montmorillonite clay alteration around the Hona prospect area as well as several other areas on the Eagle prospect. In addition, kaolinite clay alteration was concentrated within a phaneritic granodiorite based on field mapping at the Hona prospect. Both kaolinite and montmorillonite are common hydrothermal alteration minerals in porphyry and certain types of gold systems.
A number of geophysical surveys have been flown by government agencies including the most recent in 2016 when the State of Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) released public sector magnetic and frequency-domain resistivity surveys over the Hona prospect as well as lands located to the south and west of Hona.
In October 2019, the Peak Gold JV contracted Geotech Ltd. to fly helicopter-supported airborne Magnetics and Versatile Time-Domain Electromagnets (VTEM) surveys over the Hona prospect (Figure 20‑3). The total survey size was 1,006 line-km with flight lines oriented N-S at 100 m spacings with E-W tie lines at 1,000 m spacing.
FIGURE 20‑3 HONA - COINCIDENT MAG-VTEM WITH GEOCHEMISTRY AND FAVORABLE PORPHYRY/IRG GEOLOGY

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 20-5 |
|---|

20.3. EAGLE
The 64,900 acre Eagle claim block was staked in 2012 and 2013 to cover favorable Manh Choh stratigraphy mapped along trend by State Geologists. The Eagle block is underlain by similar geology as the northern Tetlin Hills and limited reconnaissance stream sediment and pan concentrate samples collected by Federal government agencies in the 1970s revealed widespread copper and arsenic (a pathfinder element for gold) anomalies within the area now covered by the Eagle claims. Gold was not analyzed for in the original government sampling.
In 2013 a reconnaissance level stream sediment and pan concentrate sampling program was completed over most of the southern part of the Eagle claim block and identified an area over 10 km along a NW corridor where every creek draining the NE slopes of the mountains was strongly anomalous in gold, arsenic, and copper (Figure 20‑4). Further sampling along the NW trend showed additional anomalous creeks up towards the Dome prospect, however, far fewer streams were sampled in that area.
Contango
intends to
complete
follow-up
field
exploration
for this
early-stage
project during
the field
program which
is planned for
Eagle, Hona,
and Triple Z
targets in
2021. The
objective of
the geologic
investigation
on the Eagle
claim block
will focus on
identifying
drill targets
in the highly
prospective
area between
the Eagle and
Dome
prospects.
Figure
20‑4 Strong
Multiple-Element
Geochemistry
on Dome and
Eagle Target
Areas

| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 20-6 |
|---|

- OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION
No additional information or explanation is necessary to provide a complete and balanced presentation of the value of the Project to Contango.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 21-1 |
|---|

INTERPRETATION
AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the review of the available information, the QP provides the following conclusions:
22.1. GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
| • | The<br> northern part<br> of the Project<br> is located in<br> rocks that are<br> highly<br> prospective<br> for<br> mid-Cretaceous<br> intrusive<br> related gold<br> deposits as<br> well as two<br> intersecting<br> belts of<br> mid-Cretaceous<br> to<br> mid-Tertiary<br> porphyry<br> copper-molybdenum-gold<br> deposits and<br> porphyry<br> related distal<br> gold skarn<br> deposits. |
|---|---|
| • | The<br> drilling,<br> sampling,<br> sample<br> preparation,<br> analysis, and<br> data<br> verification<br> procedures<br> meet or exceed<br> industry<br> standard, and<br> are<br> appropriate<br> for the<br> estimation of<br> Mineral<br> Resources. |
| --- | --- |
| • | As of<br> December 31,<br> 2022, Manh<br> Choh Mineral<br> Resources<br> (100% Peak<br> Gold JV<br> attributable<br> ownership<br> basis)<br> comprise: |
| --- | --- |
| o | Indicated<br><br><br><br> Mineral<br> Resources of<br> approximately<br> 845,700 metric<br> tonnes (t)<br> grading 2.4<br> grams per<br> metric tonne<br> (g/t) gold<br> (Au) and 9.3<br> g/t silver<br> (Ag) for<br> approximately<br> 65,290<br> contained<br> ounces (oz) Au<br> and 252,140<br> contained oz<br> Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Inferred<br><br><br><br> Mineral<br> Resources of<br> approximately<br> 21,400 t<br> grading 3.8<br> g/t Au and 9.2<br> g/t Ag for<br> approximately<br> 2,570<br> contained oz<br> Au and 6,290<br> contained oz<br> Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported<br> exclusive of<br> Mineral<br> Reserves. |
| --- | --- |
| • | As of<br> December 31,<br> 2022, Manh<br> Choh Mineral<br> Resources held<br> by Contango<br> (30%<br> attributable<br> ownership<br> basis)<br> comprise: |
| --- | --- |
| o | Indicated<br><br><br><br> Mineral<br> Resources of<br> approximately<br> 253,700 t<br> grading 2.4<br> g/t Au and 9.3<br> g/t Ag for<br> approximately<br> 19,590<br> contained oz<br> Au and 75,640<br> contained oz<br> Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Inferred<br><br><br><br> Mineral<br> Resources of<br> approximately<br> 6,400 t<br> grading 3.8<br> g/t Au and 9.2<br> g/t Ag for<br> approximately<br> 770 contained<br> oz Au and<br> 1,890<br> contained oz<br> Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Mineral<br> Resources are<br> reported<br> exclusive of<br> Mineral<br> Reserves. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The QP<br> is of the<br> opinion that<br> with<br> consideration<br> of the<br> recommendations<br> in this TRS,<br> any issues<br> relating to<br> all relevant<br> technical and<br> economic<br> factors likely<br> to influence<br> the prospect<br> of economic<br> extraction can<br> be resolved<br> with further<br> work. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> deposits<br> remain open<br> and present<br> exploration<br> potential<br> beyond the<br> current<br> Mineral<br> Resources. As<br> the area is<br> underexplored,<br> there is good<br> potential to<br> delineate<br> additional<br> exploration<br> targets on the<br> Lease. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 22-1 |
| --- | --- |

22.2. MINING AND MINERAL RESERVES
22.2.1. MINE DESIGN
| • | Pit<br> slope design<br> criteria used<br> to develop the<br> FS pit slope<br> designs are at<br> a PFS level of<br> study/confidence. <br><br><br><br> Stability<br> analyses have<br> not been<br> completed on<br> the final FS<br> pit slope<br> designs. |
|---|---|
| • | A<br> geotechnical<br> stability<br> analysis was<br> completed on<br> the Project’s<br> WRSAs and<br> confirmed a<br> low risk of<br> WRSA<br> instability. <br> WRSAs are<br> designed with<br> 3:1 side<br> slopes for<br> ease of final<br> reclamation<br> and are<br> generally<br> located on<br> hilltops where<br> adverse<br> sub-surface<br> conditions and<br> movement are<br> not expected. <br> The northeast<br> walls of MCS<br> may require<br> approximately<br> 33 ft to 50 ft<br> of horizontal<br> depressurization<br><br><br><br> to attain<br> acceptable<br> factors of<br> safety. The<br> extent to<br> which<br> horizontal<br> depressurization<br> is required<br> will need to<br> be confirmed<br> once mining<br> has progressed<br> beyond the<br> elevation of<br> the<br> groundwater<br> table. Due to<br> the overall<br> low-flow<br> groundwater<br> regime,<br> dedicated<br> dewatering<br> wells are not<br> expected to be<br> required. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> series of pit<br> shells were<br> generated<br> based on<br> varying gold<br> price input<br> factors. The<br> pit shell<br> corresponding<br> to Mineral<br> Reserve prices<br> of $1,300/oz<br> Au and $17/oz<br> Ag was<br> selected as<br> the basis for<br> the ultimate<br> pit design. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Portions<br><br><br><br> of the<br> detailed pit<br> designs vary<br> significantly<br> from the MCN<br> and MCS pit<br> limits<br> suggested by<br> the ultimate<br> pit shell<br> analysis. <br> This is due<br> to: |
| --- | --- |
| o | The<br> degree of<br> accuracy that<br> is possible<br> when modeling<br> complex pit<br> slopes and<br> transitions in<br> a pit shell<br> optimization<br> as compared to<br> completing<br> detailed<br> design. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The pit<br> shell<br> optimization<br> over-smooths<br> the influence<br> of in-pit<br> ramps on<br> overall slope<br> angle. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The<br> narrower than<br> minimum mining<br> widths that<br> result during<br> pit shell<br> optimization. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The<br> degree of<br> accuracy that<br> is possible<br> when allowing<br> the pit shell<br> optimization<br> to achieve the<br> corner design<br> for the<br> northeast wall<br> of MCS. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Several<br> pit shell<br> sensitivity<br> scenarios were<br> investigated,<br> including<br> sensitivity to<br> metal price,<br> mining cost,<br> transport and<br> processing<br> cost, and<br> slope angles. <br> Generally,<br> there is no<br> material<br> change to the<br> ultimate pit<br> limits for a<br> range of Base<br> Case inputs. <br> This is a<br> result of the<br> high grade,<br> high margin<br> nature of the<br> in-situ<br> mineralization. |
| --- | --- |
22.2.2. OPERATIONS
| • | Completing<br><br><br><br> extraction in<br> MCN early in<br> the LOM plan<br> is an<br> important<br> Project<br> objective as<br> it: |
|---|---|
| o | Enables<br> hauling of<br> waste rock<br> from MCS<br> directly into<br> MCN, thereby<br> keeping ex-pit<br> haulage costs<br> to a minimum. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Facilitates<br><br><br><br> short hauls in<br> a<br> truck-constrained<br> period of the<br> LOM plan. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Serves<br> as a long-term<br> waste storage<br> facility to<br> minimize the<br> size of ex-pit<br> waste<br> stockpiles<br> (WRSAs) that<br> would<br> otherwise<br> require<br> rehandling to<br> meet closure<br> obligations. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 22-2 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Key<br> mining<br> equipment<br> performance<br> metrics are<br> based on both<br> internal and<br> external<br> benchmarks for<br> similar<br> equipment, are<br> unchanged in<br> all LOM plan<br> time periods,<br> and are used<br> as a measure<br> of maximum<br> productive<br> hours to drive<br> the LOM plan. |
|---|---|
| • | During<br> the Project’s<br> operating<br> phase, waste<br> rock swell<br> factors will<br> be<br> investigated<br> to confirm<br> WRSA designs<br> and storage<br> capacity. In<br> the event that<br> additional<br> waste rock<br> storage<br> capacity is<br> required, or<br> MCN in-pit<br> backfill<br> capacity is<br> not available<br> as planned,<br> sections of<br> the Main WRSA<br> may be<br> constructed to<br> greater than<br> 3:1 slopes. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> Project will<br> require a<br> rigorous grade<br> control<br> program to<br> mitigate<br> mining<br> dilution and<br> ore loss. <br> Program<br> elements will<br> include<br> blasthole<br> sampling in<br> ore and waste<br> blasts,<br> high-precision<br> GPS equipment<br> on loading<br> units, and<br> blast movement<br> monitoring<br> activities. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> selected<br> highway<br> transport rate<br> (3,000 U.S.<br> short tons per<br> day (stpd)<br> ore) requires<br> that ore<br> stockpiles be<br> maintained to<br> disconnect the<br> variable<br> ex-pit ore<br> mining rate<br> from the ore<br> delivery rate<br> to the Fort<br> Knox process<br> plant. <br> Maintaining a<br> consistent ore<br> delivery rate<br> is important<br> to allow the<br> transport<br> contractor to<br> maintain<br> steady-state<br> operations and<br> for the<br> Project not to<br> incur standby<br> charges. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> Project’s<br> labor strategy<br> will include<br> both shared<br> responsibilities<br> with existing<br> Fort Knox<br> personnel and<br> dedicated Manh<br> Choh labor on<br> rotational<br> schedules. <br> Mine site<br> leadership<br> positions will<br> report to the<br> Fort Knox Mine<br> Manager. |
| --- | --- |
22.2.3. MINERAL RESERVES
| • | As of<br> December 31,<br> 2022, Manh<br> Choh Mineral<br> Reserves (100%<br> Peak Gold JV<br> attributable<br> ownership<br> basis)<br> comprise<br> Probable<br> Mineral<br> Reserves of<br> approximately<br> 3.94 Mt<br> grading 7.9<br> g/t Au and<br> 13.6 g/t Ag<br> for<br> approximately<br> 997,143<br> contained oz<br> Au and<br> 1,718,571<br> contained oz<br> Ag. |
|---|---|
| • | As of<br> December 31,<br> 2022, Manh<br> Choh Mineral<br> Reserves held<br> by Contango<br> (30%<br> attributable<br> ownership<br> basis)<br> comprise<br> Probable<br> Mineral<br> Reserves of<br> approximately<br> 1.18 Mt<br> grading 7.9<br> g/t Au and<br> 13.6 g/t Ag<br> for<br> approximately<br> 299,143<br> contained oz<br> Au and 515,571<br> contained oz<br> Ag. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The QP<br> is not aware<br> of any risk<br> factors<br> associated<br> with, or<br> changes to,<br> any aspects of<br> the modifying<br> factors such<br> as mining,<br> metallurgical,<br> infrastructure,<br><br><br><br> permitting, or<br> other relevant<br> factors that<br> could<br> materially<br> affect the<br> Mineral<br> Reserve<br> estimate. |
| --- | --- |
22.3. MINERAL PROCESSING
22.3.1. METALLURGICAL CHARACTERIZATION
| • | Mineralogy<br><br><br><br> analysis,<br> analyses on<br> cleaner<br> flotation<br> concentrates<br> and tailings,<br> and XRD<br> analysis<br> indicate that<br> the<br> predominant<br> sulfide<br> mineral in the<br> MCS deposit is<br> pyrrhotite<br> while the<br> predominant<br> copper mineral<br> is<br> chalcopyrite.<br> Gold was<br> observed in<br> samples and is<br> predominantly<br> free gold and<br> electrum. |
|---|---|
| • | XRD,<br> QEMSCAN,<br> optical<br> microscopy,<br> SEM equipped<br> with EDS, and<br> chemical<br> analysis found<br> that samples<br> contain<br> moderate (10%<br> to 30%) to<br> major<br> (>30%)<br> pyrrhotite and<br> suggest a gold<br> recovery<br> circuit design<br> having gravity<br> concentration<br> followed by<br> finer grinding<br> for further<br> liberation. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 22-3 |
| --- | --- |

| • | In<br> 2018, seven<br> metallurgical<br> composites<br> were tested to<br> measure<br> abrasion<br> index, Bond<br> ball mill work<br> index, and rod<br> mill work<br> index. <br> Samples<br> selected were<br> well<br> distributed in<br> both pits. In<br> 2021, four<br> master<br> composites and<br> eight<br> variability<br> composites<br> were tested. <br> The results of<br> this testing<br> demonstrate<br> that all<br> samples are<br> between soft<br> and medium<br> hardness and<br> abrasiveness. |
|---|---|
| • | Two<br> sulfide master<br> composite<br> samples that<br> were sent for<br> SMC testing<br> yielded one<br> sample with<br> medium to soft<br> hardness and<br> the other<br> sample<br> considered to<br> be hard. |
| --- | --- |
22.3.2. METALLURGICAL
TESTING
| • | Results<br> of<br> metallurgical<br> testing<br> programs<br> demonstrate<br> that Manh Choh<br> ore is<br> amenable to<br> being<br> recovered by<br> gravity<br> concentration,<br> flotation, and<br> cyanidation. <br> Both MCS and<br> MCN ores<br> respond well<br> to cyanide<br> leaching,<br> gravity<br> concentration,<br> and flotation. |
|---|---|
| • | Cyanide<br> leaching test<br> work showed<br> that highly<br> reactive<br> sulfide<br> materials in<br> the Manh Choh<br> ores are one<br> of the<br> challenges for<br> economical<br> gold and<br> silver<br> recovery,<br> although<br> adding cement<br> in grinding<br> and leaching<br> with oxygen<br> sparging helps<br> reduce high<br> reagent<br> consumptions. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In<br> 2014, a series<br> of flotation<br> tests were<br> completed on<br> 13<br> metallurgical<br> composite<br> samples from<br> the Project. <br> Test results<br> show a direct<br> correlation<br> between the<br> percentage of<br> total sulfur<br> content in the<br> feeds and the<br> gold flotation<br> recoveries and<br> indicates most<br> of the gold in<br> the samples is<br> associated<br> with sulfide<br> minerals. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In<br> 2019, 22<br> rougher<br> flotation<br> tests and nine<br> cleaner<br> flotation<br> tests were<br> completed on<br> Manh Choh ore<br> samples, of<br> which four<br> rougher<br> flotation<br> tests and four<br> cleaner<br> flotation<br> tests were<br> assayed for<br> gold content.<br> Test results<br> show a direct<br> correlation<br> for both gold<br> recovery and<br> mass pull with<br> the total<br> sulfur content<br> in the<br> samples. The<br> cleaner tests<br> show that the<br> gold grade in<br> the flotation<br> concentrate<br> can be<br> improved but<br> at the expense<br> of the overall<br> gold recovery. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Gold<br> recoveries<br> from 51<br> gravity<br> concentration<br> tests did not<br> show clear<br> correlation<br> between gold<br> head grades<br> and gold<br> recoveries.<br> The average<br> gold recovery<br> from all tests<br> was 25%,<br> however, the<br> recovery<br> variance<br> standard<br> deviation is<br> as high as<br> 20%. The<br> average silver<br> recovery from<br> all tests was<br> 10%. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In<br> 2021, EGRG<br> tests were<br> completed on<br> four master<br> composites<br> from Manh<br> Choh. Test<br> results show<br> that the<br> maximum gold<br> recovery for<br> Manh Choh ore<br> samples varies<br> between 16.3%<br> and 50.7%. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The<br> results of the<br> flowsheet<br> options study<br> confirmed that<br> Manh Choh<br> samples<br> respond well<br> to the<br> gravity/flotation/cyanidation<br> flowsheet,<br> however, the<br> overall<br> reagent<br> consumption<br> was higher as<br> compared to<br> whole ore<br> leaching<br> options. <br> Based on the<br> study of the<br> MCS sulfide<br> composite, the<br> savings in<br> NaCN and lime<br> consumption<br> made the whole<br> ore leach the<br> preferred<br> option for the<br> FS. |
| --- | --- |
22.3.3. PROCESS SELECTION AND OPERATIONS
| • | The<br> existing Fort<br> Knox<br> processing<br> facility will<br> continue to<br> operate with<br> Fort Knox ore<br> on a batch<br> basis along<br> with the Manh<br> Choh ore. The<br> equipment and<br> process as is<br> currently<br> designed will<br> not be<br> modified when<br> processing ore<br> from Fort<br> Knox, however,<br> additional<br> equipment and<br> piping<br> modifications<br> to some areas<br> of the plant<br> will be<br> required for<br> when<br> processing<br> Manh Choh ore. |
|---|---|
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 22-4 |
| --- | --- |

| • | The<br> site<br> conditions,<br> operating<br> conditions,<br> and safety<br> parameters are<br> documented and<br> provided for<br> in the design<br> basis. The<br> environmental<br> constraints<br> have been<br> identified and<br> are considered<br> in the design. |
|---|---|
| • | Any<br> adjustments to<br> the FS LOM<br> plan or<br> stockpiling<br> strategy need<br> to be<br> carefully<br> considered<br> relative to<br> the current<br> stockpiling<br> objective,<br> i.e.,<br> prioritizing<br> high-grade<br> Fort Knox mill<br> feed early in<br> the life of<br> the Project. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The QP<br> is of the<br> opinion that<br> the data<br> derived from<br> the Project’s<br> metallurgical<br> testing<br> activities is<br> adequate for<br> the purposes<br> of Mineral<br> Resource and<br> Mineral<br> Reserve<br> estimation. |
| --- | --- |
22.4. ENVIRONMENTAL
AND SOCIAL
CONSIDERATIONS
| • | The<br> Project is<br> located on<br> land owned and<br> controlled by<br> the Native<br> Village of<br> Tetlin<br> (Tetlin), an<br> indigenous<br> Upper Tanana<br> Athabascan<br> Native Alaskan<br> community. <br> Tetlin owns<br> both the<br> surface and<br> the subsurface<br> rights to<br> their land. |
|---|---|
| • | In<br> accordance<br> with the U.S.<br> NEPA, the U.S.<br> ACOE is<br> required to<br> prepare either<br> an EA or an<br> EIS for the<br> Project using<br> environmental<br> baseline<br> surveys and<br> public<br> comments. <br> Based on a<br> proactive<br> effort to<br> minimize<br> Project-related<br> impacts to<br> wetlands, an<br> EIS was not<br> required and a<br> wetlands<br> permit was<br> issued in<br> September 2022<br> as part of an<br> EA of the<br> Project. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Although<br><br><br><br> not considered<br> material to<br> operating<br> permits, in<br> response to<br> public<br> concerns, the<br> Department of<br> Transportation<br> and Public<br> Facilities has<br> funded an<br> independent<br> corridor<br> analysis to<br> review<br> potential<br> impacts of an<br> increase in<br> traffic along<br> the selected<br> access route.<br> The selected<br> corridor<br> analysis<br> contractor<br> will work with<br> the newly<br> established<br> TAC that is<br> being led by a<br> consultant.<br> The TAC will<br> make<br> recommendations<br> to the<br> contractor and<br> will help<br> identify areas<br> of concern. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Manh<br> Choh ore has<br> both PAG and<br> NAG<br> components. <br> Manh Choh ore<br> will be<br> processed at<br> Fort Knox<br> prior to the<br> onset of PAG<br> conditions. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Waste<br> rock in the<br> mine site area<br> includes<br> materials that<br> are both PAG<br> and ML. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Pit<br> wall rock<br> masses<br> assessed as<br> being ML or<br> PAG will be<br> covered during<br> mining and<br> reclamation<br> activities. |
| --- | --- |
| o | During<br> mining,<br> surface water<br> run-off and<br> pit inflows<br> will be<br> collected and<br> treated via a<br> perimeter<br> ditch<br> collection<br> system and<br> in-pit<br> dewatering<br> infrastructure. |
| --- | --- |
| o | WRSAs<br> are designed<br> to minimize<br> recharge and<br> to isolate PAG<br> and ML<br> material,<br> thereby<br> minimizing any<br> potential for<br> external<br> discharge from<br> the waste rock<br> over the long<br> term. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Since<br> 2012, surface<br> water<br> monitoring<br> data has been<br> collected from<br> 19 sites<br> around the<br> Project area. <br> Stream<br> discharge is<br> perennial in<br> all catchments<br> and most<br> stream flows<br> during the<br> low-flow late<br> fall and<br> winter months<br> are assumed to<br> represent<br> baseflows due<br> to the limited<br> precipitation<br> in the Project<br> area during<br> this period. <br> The Project<br> does not<br> include<br> disturbance of<br> fish habitat. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Groundwater<br><br><br><br> flow in the<br> Project area<br> is extremely<br> low and<br> localized due<br> to dry<br> conditions and<br> limited<br> recharge<br> area. The<br> small amount<br> of recharge<br> that does<br> occur is<br> related to<br> spring<br> snowmelt and<br> the relatively<br> large seasonal<br> fluctuation of<br> groundwater<br> levels is<br> indicative of<br> a low storage<br> groundwater<br> system. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 22-5 |
| --- | --- |

| • | Low<br> rates of<br> groundwater<br> in-flow to the<br> pits, low<br> bedrock<br> hydraulic<br> conductivity,<br> and a deep<br> water table<br> suggests that<br> drawdown will<br> be limited to<br> the localized<br> areas of the<br> pit walls. |
|---|---|
| • | Manh<br> Choh will be a<br> low<br> water-usage<br> mine and<br> droughts are<br> not expected<br> to have a<br> significant<br> impact on<br> operations. <br> If more<br> frequent or<br> intense<br> rainstorms<br> occur, the<br> mine site is<br> well situated<br> on a hilltop<br> high above the<br> flood plain,<br> is designed to<br> safely manage<br> a 1 in<br> 100-year storm<br> event, and by<br> designing to<br> low<br> probability<br> events,<br> infrastructure<br> becomes<br> inherently<br> resilient to<br> changes in<br> precipitation<br> over the<br> relatively<br> short mine<br> life. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Water<br> quality is<br> generally good<br> in headwater<br> streams that<br> drain the<br> Project area.<br> Baseline iron,<br> arsenic, and<br> manganese<br> concentrations<br> in Tors Creek<br> exceed ADEC<br> guideline<br> values due to<br> the proximity<br> of the<br> mineralized<br> orebody.<br> Baseline<br> sulfate,<br> metals, and<br> TDS<br> concentrations<br> are<br> consistently<br> higher in<br> groundwater<br> than surface<br> water,<br> particularly<br> in the<br> vicinity of<br> the orebody,<br> however,<br> concentrations<br> are not<br> consistently<br> higher than<br> ADEC guideline<br> values. |
| --- | --- |
| • | None of<br> the species<br> recorded in<br> the Project<br> area are<br> listed as<br> Threatened or<br> Endangered as<br> specified by<br> the USFWS. <br> There are<br> however some<br> fauna species<br> and habitat<br> worth noting: |
| --- | --- |
| o | The<br> Tetlin Hills<br> are within the<br> breeding range<br> of the<br> Olive-sided<br> Flycatcher,<br> which is<br> designated by<br> the USFWS as a<br> species of<br> conservation<br> concern. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The<br> Short-eared<br> Owl was not<br> observed but<br> is also a<br> species of<br> conservation<br> concern and<br> may occur in<br> the area. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Two<br> Bald Eagle<br> nests were<br> found during<br> the raptor<br> nest survey,<br> both greater<br> than two miles<br> from the<br> Project. The<br> USFWS advises<br> that<br> activities<br> within two<br> miles of Bald<br> Eagle or<br> Golden Eagle<br> nests may<br> require an<br> incidental<br> take permit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Three<br> common raven<br> nests were<br> found and<br> these species<br> are protected<br> under the<br> MBTA. |
| --- | --- |
| o | The<br> Project<br> avoided<br> important<br> lowland moose<br> habitat<br> surrounding<br> the Tok River.<br> Individual<br> animals from<br> two caribou<br> herds may be<br> present<br> seasonally.<br> Caribou avoid<br> areas of<br> recent<br> wildfire,<br> which<br> indicates they<br> may naturally<br> avoid the<br> Project. |
| --- | --- |
| • | No<br> Project<br> activities are<br> located within<br> protected<br> areas. The<br> closest<br> protected area<br> is the Tetlin<br> National<br> Wildlife<br> refuge, which<br> is<br> approximately<br> 20 to 30 miles<br> to the east<br> and southeast<br> of the<br> Project. |
| --- | --- |
| • | During<br> Project<br> baseline<br> information<br> collection<br> activities,<br> seven<br> prehistoric<br> archaeological<br> sites were<br> identified<br> with five of<br> these sites<br> meeting<br> federal<br> archaeological<br> site<br> significance<br> criteria<br> making them<br> eligible for<br> listing on the<br> NRHP. Based<br> on the<br> Project’s 2021<br> mine and<br> infrastructure<br> plans, the<br> Project could<br> impact one<br> NRHP eligible<br> site while the<br> four other<br> NRHP eligible<br> sites should<br> be avoidable<br> over the<br> course of the<br> LOM. |
| --- | --- |
| • | A<br> Cultural<br> Heritage<br> Management<br> Plan has been<br> developed to<br> address the<br> mitigation<br> plan for the<br> NRHP eligible<br> archaeological<br> site that will<br> be adversely<br> affected by<br> the Project<br> and future<br> discoveries of<br> cultural<br> resources that<br> may be<br> discovered<br> during the<br> Project’s<br> construction<br> and operation. |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 22-6 |
| --- | --- |

| • | The<br> local area of<br> Tok and<br> surrounding<br> areas,<br> including<br> Tetlin, have<br> expressed<br> support for<br> the Project in<br> numerous<br> engagements,<br> community<br> meetings,<br> public<br> testimony, and<br> in letter<br> form. The<br> local<br> communities<br> expect that<br> the Project<br> will maximize<br> opportunities<br> for local<br> employment and<br> local<br> business,<br> operate in a<br> safe and<br> environmentally<br> responsible<br> manner,<br> properly<br> maintain the<br> tribal road<br> impacted by<br> increased<br> traffic, and<br> respect the<br> desire to<br> maintain<br> cultural and<br> subsistence<br> ways of life. |
|---|---|
| • | Mine<br> site<br> reclamation<br> and closure<br> will be<br> performed in<br> accordance<br> with the Manh<br> Choh Project<br> RCP. The RCP<br> was originally<br> submitted for<br> approval to<br> ADNR and ADEC<br> in December<br> 2021 and was<br> subsequently<br> updated and<br> re-submitted<br> in January<br> 2022. The RCP<br> includes a<br> closure cost<br> estimate<br> prepared using<br> Alaska’s SRCE<br> model, which<br> was used for<br> calculating<br> the financial<br> assurance<br> amount (bond)<br> required by<br> ADNR and<br> ADEC. The<br> SRCE model<br> estimated a<br> financial<br> assurance<br> requirement of<br> approximately<br> $63.5<br> million. <br> Contango’s<br> attributable<br> ownership<br> portion of the<br> financial<br> assurance<br> requirement is<br> approximately<br> $19.1 million,<br> or as may be<br> amended in the<br> future. |
| --- | --- |
| • | In the<br> QP’s opinion,<br> the current<br> plans related<br> to<br> environmental<br> compliance,<br> permitting,<br> and local<br> individuals or<br> groups are<br> reasonable for<br> this level of<br> study |
| --- | --- |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 22-7 |
| --- | --- |

- RECOMMENDATIONS
23.1. GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
| 1. | Geologic<br><br><br><br> exploration is<br> on-going in<br> the vicinity<br> of the Manh<br> Choh deposit<br> and new data<br> should be<br> incorporated<br> in the<br> resource area<br> when QA/QC and<br> validation<br> work is<br> complete.<br> Several other<br> holes were<br> drilled in<br> 2021 with<br> results not<br> available at<br> the time of<br> the model<br> estimate. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Review<br> second-laboratory<br><br><br><br> and additional<br> QA/QC results<br> pending at the<br> time of the<br> model<br> estimate. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Complete<br><br><br><br> additional<br> relogging<br> validation of<br> skarn<br> intensity<br> codes, redox<br> codes, and<br> structural<br> measurements<br> to add<br> additional<br> support to the<br> estimate<br> domains and<br> methodology. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Complete<br><br><br><br> additional<br> density<br> measurements<br> in oxide waste<br> areas where<br> sample density<br> could be<br> increased. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Carry<br> out additional<br> metal<br> estimates<br> based on<br> geochemical<br> results to<br> support other<br> recovery,<br> geochemical,<br> and<br> metallurgical<br> considerations<br> such as<br> bismuth, lead,<br> and zinc. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Complete<br><br><br><br> additional<br> sensitivity<br> work related<br> to simulated<br> gold grade<br> dilution. |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | Carry<br> out a<br> comparison of<br> the grade<br> capping on the<br> 10 ft<br> composites and<br> the variable<br> raw assays. |
| --- | --- |
| 8. | Use<br> Disintegration<br> Analysis for<br> grade capping. |
| --- | --- |
| 9. | To<br> avoid<br> over-estimation<br> of grades in<br> certain areas,<br> review and<br> confirm<br> declustered<br> mean values. |
| --- | --- |
| 10. | Test<br> the variable<br> orientation<br> and estimation<br> in Leapfrog<br> rather than<br> moving the<br> work to Vulcan<br> software. |
| --- | --- |
| 11. | Tabulate<br><br><br><br> and review<br> capped vs.<br> uncapped gold<br> volumetric<br> output (grade<br> and ounces)<br> from the block<br> model by<br> domain. |
| --- | --- |
| 12. | Prior<br> to production,<br> complete an RC<br> grade control<br> program to<br> assess closer<br> spaced grade<br> variability. |
| --- | --- |
| 13. | The QP<br> has reviewed<br> the inputs for<br> the reporting<br> of Mineral<br> Resources and<br> is of the<br> opinion that<br> they are<br> reasonable. <br> The QP<br> recommends<br> that these<br> inputs be<br> reviewed<br> during any<br> future<br> studies. |
| --- | --- |
23.2. MINING AND MINERAL RESERVES
| 1. | Complete<br><br><br><br> additional<br> geotechnical<br> drilling, site<br> investigation,<br> and analysis<br> to further<br> optimize FS<br> mine designs<br> and the<br> operational<br> phase of the<br> Project.<br> Confirm the<br> orientation of<br> critical<br> structures and<br> further inform<br> potentially<br> problematic<br> domains, i.e.,<br> the North<br> Domain in MCS<br> and the<br> Northeast<br> Domain in MCN. |
|---|---|
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 23-1 |
| --- | --- |

| 2. | For<br> optimal wall<br> control, adopt<br> pre-split<br> blasting in<br> all<br> geotechnical<br> domains. Trim<br> blasting may<br> be sufficient<br> for the design<br> sectors<br> identified as<br> having slope<br> stability<br> controlled by<br> discrete<br> faults or<br> fault/shear<br> anisotropy. |
|---|---|
| 3. | Horizontal<br><br><br><br> groundwater<br> depressurization<br> may be<br> required in<br> one<br> geotechnical<br> design sector,<br> however, this<br> should be<br> confirmed<br> during the<br> Project’s<br> operating<br> phase. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | At MCS,<br> straight north<br> and east pit<br> walls are<br> designed to<br> meet at a<br> corner to<br> avoid<br> transitioning<br> to a northeast<br> wall<br> orientation<br> that would<br> parallel<br> problematic<br> structures. It<br> is critical<br> that the<br> orientations<br> of the<br> straight north<br> and east pit<br> walls fall<br> outside the<br> range of<br> influence of<br> adversely<br> orientated<br> structures. <br> The<br> orientation of<br> adverse<br> structures at<br> these pit wall<br> locations<br> should be<br> confirmed by<br> further<br> drilling. |
| --- | --- |
23.3. MINERAL PROCESSING
| 1. | Review/evaluate<br><br><br><br> the following<br> potential<br> improvements: |
|---|---|
| o | Install<br> Auto Dilution<br> for the<br> thickener feed<br> well to<br> decrease the<br> feed solids<br> level prior to<br> flocculation,<br> improving<br> particle<br> setting rates. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Acid<br> wash carbon<br> prior to<br> elution. This<br> will improve<br> elution<br> efficiency by<br> removing<br> impurities<br> such as<br> copper,<br> calcium, and<br> magnesium<br> which can<br> impede both<br> the elution<br> step and the<br> later<br> adsorption of<br> gold onto the<br> carbon after<br> it has been<br> returned to<br> the CIP<br> circuit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Complete<br><br><br><br> regeneration<br> of all carbon<br> prior to<br> sending it<br> back to the<br> CIP circuit.<br> This will<br> restore the<br> activity of<br> spent<br> activated<br> carbon by<br> removal of<br> organic<br> absorbates and<br> lower the need<br> to add<br> additional<br> fresh carbon<br> into the<br> circuit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | To<br> increase<br> solution flow<br> rates, replace<br> piping to<br> electrowinning<br> circuit. |
| --- | --- |
| o | To<br> reduce costs,<br> complete a<br> hydraulic<br> study of<br> slurry flow to<br> evaluate the<br> elimination of<br> smaller<br> inter-tank<br> piping and<br> instead use<br> existing<br> piping. |
| --- | --- |
| o | To<br> reduce<br> equipment<br> scaling and<br> improve heat<br> exchange,<br> complete<br> regular<br> cleaning of<br> the heat<br> exchanger and<br> associated<br> lines with<br> sulfamic acid. |
| --- | --- |
| o | Evaluate<br><br><br><br> in-line<br> heating of<br> eluate or<br> heating of a<br> portion of the<br> eluate prior<br> to stripping. <br> Either<br> improvement<br> may eliminate<br> the need for<br> an extra<br> heater to heat<br> the elution<br> columns and<br> reduce elution<br> times. |
| --- | --- |
23.4. ENVIRONMENTAL
AND SOCIAL
CONSIDERATIONS
| 1. | Continue<br><br><br><br> adherence to<br> the existing<br> avoidance plan<br> for all seven<br> identified<br> prehistoric<br> sites to<br> prevent any<br> damage to<br> their current<br> condition or<br> integrity<br> until ACOE<br> NRHP<br> eligibility<br> determinations<br> are<br> formalized. |
|---|---|
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 23-2 |
| --- | --- |

- REFERENCES
Baker,
T., Ebert, S.,
Rombach, C.
and Ryan,
C.G., 2006,
Chemical
compositions
of fluid
inclusions in
intrusion-related
gold systems,
Alaska and
Yukon, using
PIXE
microanalysis:
Econ. Geol.
Vol. 101, pp.
311-327.
Bundtzen,
T.K. and
Miller, M.L.,
1997, Precious
metals
associated
with Late
Cretaceous
Early Tertiary
igneous rocks
of
southwestern
Alaska, in
Goldfarb.
R.J., and
Miller, L.D.,
eds., Mineral
deposits of
Alaska:
Economic
Geology
Monograph 9,
pp. 242-286.
Craggs,
S., 2019,
Report on
structural
geology
analysis for
the Tetlin
Project,
Alaska: SRK
Report
prepared for
Peak Gold JV,
January 2019,
52p.
Day, W.C., Gamble, B.M., Henning, M.W., and Smith, B.D., 2000, Geologic setting of the Fortymile River area; polyphase deformational history within part of the eastern Yukon-Tanana uplands of Alaska, in Kelley, K.D., and Gough, L.P., eds., Geologic studies in Alaska by the U. S. Geological Survey, 1998: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1615, p. 65-82.
Douglas,
T. A., 1997,
Metamorphic
histories of
the Chatanika
eclogite and
Fairbanks
Schist within
the Yukon
Tanana
Terrane,
Alaska, as
revealed by
electron
microprobe
geothermometry
and 40AR/39AR
single grain
dating: unpub.
Masters
Thesis, Univ.
Alaska –
Fairbanks.
Dusel-Bacon,
C., Hopkins,
M.J.,
Mortensen,
J.K.,
Dashevsky,
S.S.,
Bressler,
J.R., and Day,
W.C., 2006,
Paleozoic
tectonic and
metallogenic
evolution of
the
pericratonic
rocks of
east-central
Alaska and
adjacent
Yukon:
Geological
Association of
Canada,
Special Paper
no. 45, p.
25–74.
Ebert,
S., Dilworth,
K., Roberts,
P., Smith, M
and Bressler,
J, 2003,
Quartz veins
and gold
prospects in
the Goodpaster
Mining
district in
Ebert, S.\[ed\],
2003, Regional
geologic
framework and
deposit
specific
exploration
models for
Intrusion-related
gold
mineralization,
Yukon and
Alaska:
Mineral
Deposits
Research Unit,
Spec. Pub. 3,
pp. 256-281.
Ellis,
W.T., Hawley,
C.C. and
Dashevsky, S.,
2004, Alaska
Resource Data
File for the
Mount Hayes
Quadrangles,
Alaska: U.S.
Geol. Surv.,
Open File
Rept.
2004-1266, 742
p.
Flanigan,
B., Freeman,
C., Newberry,
R., McCoy, D.,
Hart, C.,
2000,
Exploration
models for mid
and late
cretaceous
Intrusion-related
gold deposits
in Alaska and
the Yukon
Territory,
Canada, in
Geology and
Ore Deposits
2000: The
Great Basin
and Beyond,
Geological
Society of
Nevada, pp.
138-157.
Foster,
H.L., 1970,
Reconnaissance
geologic map
of the
Tanacross
quadrangle,
Alaska: U.S.
Geol. Surv.
Misc. Geol.
Investigations
Map I-593, 1
sheet, scale
1:250,000.
Foster,
H.L., Keith,
T.E.C., and
Menzie, W.D.,
1994, Geology
of the
Yukon-Tanana
area of
eastcentral
Alaska, in,
Plafker, G.,
and Berg,
H.C., eds.,
The Geology of
Alaska:
Boulder,
Colorado,
Geological
Society of
America, The
Geology of
North America,
v. G-1, pp.
205-240.
Freeman,
C.J., and
Marek, J.,
2017,
Technical
report on the
mineral
resource
update for the
Tetlin
Project,
Tanacross and
Nabesna
Quadrangles,
Eastern
Interior,
Alaska: Report
prepared for
Peak Gold,
LLC, June,
2017, 150 p.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 24-1 |
|---|

Fugro Airborne Surveys Corp., 2011, Project report for the airborne geophysical survey, Contango ORE Inc., Tok area, Alaska: Fugro Airborne Surveys Corp., August 29, 2011,
Fugro Airborne Surveys Corp., 2013a, Geophysical Survey Report, Airborne magnetic and Dighem survey: unpub. Report, project 13021, prepared for Avalon Development Corp., July 17, 2013, 85p.
Fugro Airborne Surveys Corp., 2013b, Geophysical Survey Report, Airborne magnetic and helitem survey: unpub. Report, project 13024, prepared for Avalon Development Corp., July 19, 2013, 76p
Giroux,
G., 2013a,
Inferred
resource
estimate for
the Peak zone,
Tetlin
Project,
Alaska:
Internal
report
prepared for
Contango ORE,
Inc.,
February,
2013, 26p.
Giroux,
G., 2013b,
Indicated and
inferred
resource
estimate for
the Peak zone,
Tetlin
Project,
Alaska: Report
prepared for
Contango ORE,
Inc.,
November,
2013, 44p.
Gopinathan,
I., Pilotto,
D., Bolu, M.,
Embree, K.,
Freeman, C.
Marek, J.,
Wellman, E.,
Isto, M.,
2018,
Preliminary
Economic
Assessment –
NI 43-101
technical
report, Peak
Gold Project
Alaska, USA,
724 p.
Hansen,
V.L., and
Dusel-Bacon,
Cynthia, 1998,
Structural and
kinematic
evolution of
the
Yukon-Tanana
upland
tectonites,
east-central
Alaska—a
record of late
Paleozoic to
Mesozoic
crustal
assembly:
Geological
Society of
America
Bulletin, v.
110, no. 2, p.
211–230
Hart, C.J.R., McCoy, D.T., Smith, M, Roberts, P., Hulstein, R., Bakke, A.A., and Bundtzen, T.K., 2002, Geology, exploration and discovery in the Tintina Gold Province, Alaska and Yukon: Soc. Econ. Geol., Spec. Pub. 9, p. 241-274.
Hart, Craig J.R., Goldfarb, Richard J., Lewis, Lara L., and Mair, John L., 2004, The northern cordilleran mid-Cretaceous plutonic province: ilmenite/magnetite-series granitoids and intrusion-related
mineralization.
Resource
Geology, Vol.
54, pp.
253-280.
Holm-Denoma,
C.S., Sicard,
K.R., and
Twelker, Evan,
2020, U-Pb
geochronology
of igneous and
detrital
zircon samples
from the Tok
River area,
eastern Alaska
Range, and
Talkeetna
Mountains,
Alaska: Alaska
Division of
Geological
&
Geophysical
Surveys Raw
Data File
2020-3, 20p.
Illig,
P.E., 2015,
Geology and
origins of the
Peak
gold-copper-silver
skarn deposit,
Tok, Alaska:
Master of
Science
Thesis,
University of
Alaska –
Fairbanks,
167p.
Kappes,
Cassiday &
Associates
\(KCA\), 2014,
Tetlin Project
Report of
Metallurgical
Test Work
MET-1 through
MET-6 and
MET-8 2014,
Test Report.
KCA, 2014, Tetlin Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work MET-7 and MET-9 through MET-13, Test Report.
KGMA, 2022a, Tetlin Project Feasibility Study Report, Internal Documents, July 2022.
Klipfel,
P., and
Giroux, G.,
2009, January
2009 Summary
report on the
Livengood
Project,
Tolovana
District,
Alaska: NI
43-101 report
for
International
Tower Hill
Mines, 99 p.
Lang, J.R., and Baker, T., 2001, Intrusion-related gold systems: the present level of understanding. Mineralium Deposita, Vol. 36, pp. 477-489
McCoy,
D.T., 1999,
Regional
overview of
the geologic
setting of the
Tintina Gold
Belt: in
Abstracts of
the 16th
Annual
Cordilleran
Exploration
Roundup,
Vancouver, pp.
20-21.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 24-2 |
|---|

McCoy,
D.T.;
Newberry,
R.J.; Layer,
P., DiMarchi,
J.; Bakke, A.;
Masterman,
J.S. and
Minehane,
D.L., 1997,
Plutonic-related
gold deposits
of interior
Alaska: in
Econ. Geol.
Mono. 9,
“Mineral
Deposits of
Alaska”, pp.
191-241.
McCoy,
D.T.,
Newberry, R.
J., Severin,
K., Marion,
P., Flanigan,
B. and
Freeman, C.J.,
2002,
Paragenesis
and metal
associations
in Interior
Alaska gold
deposits: an
example from
the Fairbanks
District:
Mining
Engineering,
Jan., 2002, p.
33-38.
McClelland
Laboratories,
Inc. \(MLI\),
2017, Report
on Bottle Roll
Cyanidation
Tests – Tetlin
Drill Interval
Reject
Composites MLI
Job No. 4205,
Test Report.
MLI, 2018, Report on Bottle Roll Tests – Tetlin Main Peak Drill Interval Reject Composites MLI Job No. 4279, Test Report.
MLI, 2018, 4351 Report Tables, Test Summary.
MLI, 2019, Report on Preliminary Flotation Testing – Tetlin Drill Core Composites MLI Job No. 4393, Test Report.
MLI, 2021, 4646 Peak Gold Report_1-24-22 2021, Test Report.
Meyers,
G.L. and
Meinert, L.D.,
1991,
Alteration,
mineralization
and gold
distribution
in the
Fortitude gold
skarn deposit
in Raines,
G.L., Lisle,
R.E., Schafer,
R.W. and
Wilkinson,
W.H., editors,
1991, Geology
and Ore
Deposits of
the Great
Basin:
Symposium
Proceedings of
the Geological
Society of
Nevada, pp.
407-417.
Mortensen,
J.K., Hart,
C.J.R.,
Murphy, D.C.,
and Heffernan,
S., 2000,
Temporal
evolution of
early and
mid-Cretaceous
magmatism in
the Tintina
Gold Belt: The
Tintina Gold
Belt:
concepts,
exploration
and
discoveries,
BCYCM Spec.
Vol. 2
\(Cordilleran
Roundup Jan.
2000\), pp.
49-57.
Newberry,
R.J.; Allegro,
G.L., Cutler,
S.E.,
Hagen-Levelle,
J.H., Adams,
D.D.,
Nicholson,
L.C., Weglarz,
T.B., Bakke,
A.A.,
Clautice,
K.H., Coulter,
G.A., Ford,
M.J., Meyers,
G.L and
Szumigala,
D.J., 1997,
Skarn deposits
of Alaska: in
Econ. Geol.
Mono. 9,
“Mineral
Deposits of
Alaska”, pp.
355-395.
Newberry,
R.J., Layer,
P.W.,
Burleigh, R.E.
and Solie,
D.N., 1998,
New 40Ar39Ar
Dates for
Intrusions and
Mineral
Prospects in
the Eastern
Yukon-Tanana
Terrane,
Alaska-Regional
Patterns and
Significance:
U.S. Geol.
Surv., Prof.
Paper 1595,
pp. 131-159.
Newberry,
R.J., 2000,
Mineral
deposits and
associated
Mesozoic and
Tertiary
igneous rocks
within the
interior
Alaska and
adjacent Yukon
portions of
the ‘Tintina
Gold Belt’: a
progress
report: in The
Tintina Gold
Belt:
Concepts,
Exploration,
and
Discoveries,
British
Columbia and
Yukon Chamber
of Mines,
Cordilleran
Roundup,
59-88.
Nokleberg,
W.J.,
Aleinikoff,
J.N., Lange,
I.M., Silva,
S.R., Miyaoka,
R.T., Schwab,
C.E., and
Zehner, R.E,
1992,
Preliminary
Geologic Map
of the Mount
Hayes
Quadrangle,
Eastern Alaska
Range, Alaska,
U.S.G.S. Open
File Report
92-594.
Nokleberg,
W.J., Brew,
D.A., Grybeck,
D., Yeend, W.,
Bundtzen,
T.K.,
Robinson,
M.S., Smith,
T.E., 1994,
Metallogeny
and major
mineral
deposits of
Alaska, in
Plafker, G.,
and Berg,
H.C., eds, The
Geology of
Alaska:
Boulder,
Colorado,
Geological
Society of
America, The
Geology of
North America,
v. G-1, pp.
855-903.
Ordóñez,
J.C., Combined
Lithogeochemistry
and alteration
of the Manh
Choh deposit:
Kinross
presentation,
May 17, 2021,
14p.
Pocock
Industrial,
Inc., 2022,
Flocculant
Screening
Gravity
Sedimentation
and Pulp
Rheology
Studies
Conducted for:
McClelland
Laboratories,
Inc., Test
Report.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 24-3 |
|---|

Richter,
D.H., 1976,
Geologic map
of the Nabesna
Quadrangle,
Alaska: U.S.
Geol. Surv.,
Misc. Inv. Map
I-932.
SGS, 2014, An Investigation into Gold and Silver Recovery of Samples from the Tetlin Project, Test Report.
Silberling,
N.J., Jones,
D.L., Monger,
J.W.H., Coney,
P.J., Berg,
H.C. and
Plafker, G.,
1994,
Lithotectonic
terrane map of
Alaska and
adjacent parts
of Canada in
Plafker, G.
and Berg,
H.C., editors,
The Geology of
Alaska:
Geological
Soc. Amer.,
Geology of
North Amer.,
V. G-1, Plate
1,
1:2,500,000, 1
sheet.
Sillitoe,
R.H., 2010,
Porphyry
copper
systems: Econ.
Geol., Vol.
105, pp. 3-41.
Sillitoe,
R.H., 2013,
Comments on
the Tetlin
gold-copper
project,
Alaska: Report
prepared for
Contango ORE,
Inc.,
September 2,
2013, 12p
SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc., 2018, Tetlin Gold Project Geochemical Characterization – FINAL, prepared for Peak Gold, LLC, September 2018.
Steinert,
2021,
TRE-18256-KSS-1023
- Kinross -
Manh Choh
Project Test
Report
20211115, Test
Report.
Twelker,
E., Freeman,
L.K., Sicard,
K.R., and
Busk, A.C.,
2016,
Preliminary
report on
mineral
occurrences in
the Tok River
area, Alaska:
Alaska
Division of
Geological
&
Geophysical
Surveys
Preliminary
Interpretive
Report 2016-2,
7 p.
Van Treeck, C., Wolf, K., 2013, 2012 Triple Z project drill program, Tanacross Quadrangle, Eastern Interior Alaska: Report for Contango ORE, Inc., February 15, 2013, 22p.
Van Treeck, C., Freeman, C.J., Wolf, K., and Raymond, L., 2013, Geology and mineralization of the Tetlin Project, Tanacross and Nabesna Quadrangles, Eastern Interior Alaska: Report for Contango ORE, Inc., January 18, 2013, 119 p.
Van Treeck, C., Freeman, C.J., Wolf, K., Raymond, L. and Giroux, G., 2014, 2013 final report for the Tetlin Project, Tanacross and Nabesna Quadrangles, Eastern Interior Alaska: Report for Contango ORE, Inc., January 24, 2014, 211p.
Werdon,
M.B., Solie,
D.N., Andrew,
J.E., Freeman,
L.K.,
Newberry,
R.J.,
Szumigala,
D.J., and
Elliott, B.A.,
2019,
Bedrock-geologic
map, Alaska
Highway
corridor, Dot
Lake to Tetlin
Junction,
Alaska: Alaska
Division of
Geological
&
Geophysical
Surveys
Preliminary
Interpretive
Report 2019-2,
14 p., 2
sheets, scale
1:63,360.
Windels,
C., 2010,
Preliminary
interpretation
of geophysical
data from the
Tetlin
Project,
Alaska: Report
by Carl
Windels for
Contango ORE
Company,
November,
2010.
Windels,
C., 2011, Full
flight block
geophysical
sections,
Chief Danny
area, Tetlin
Project,
Alaska: Report
by Carl
Windels for
Contango ORE
Company,
December,
2011.
Wypych,
A., Sicard,
K.R., Twelker,
Evan, Freeman,
L.K., Lande,
Lauren, and
Reioux, D.A.,
2015,
Major-oxide
and
trace-element
geochemical
data from
rocks
collected in
2015 in the
Tok area,
Tanacross A-5,
A-6, and parts
of adjacent
quadrangles,
Alaska: Alaska
Division of
Geological
&
Geophysical
Surveys Raw
Data File
2015-15, 3 p.
Young,
L.E., St.
George, P. and
Bouley, B.A.,
1997, Porphyry
copper
deposits in
relation to
the magmatic
history and
Palinspastic
reconstruction
of Alaska in
Goldfarb,
R.J., ed. Ore
Deposits of
Alaska,
Economic
Geology
Monograph, No.
9, Society of
Economic
Geologists,
pp. 306-333.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 24-4 |
|---|

RELIANCE
ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT
This TRS has been prepared by SR for Contango. The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates contained herein are based on:
| • | Information<br><br><br><br> available to<br> SR at the time<br> of preparation<br> of this TRS, |
|---|---|
| • | Assumptions,<br><br><br><br> conditions,<br> and<br> qualifications<br> as set forth<br> in this TRS,<br> and |
| --- | --- |
| • | Data,<br> reports, and<br> other<br> information<br> supplied by<br> Contango and<br> other third<br> party sources. |
| --- | --- |
It is believed that the basic assumptions are factual and accurate, and that the interpretations are reasonable.
For the purpose of this TRS, SR has relied on ownership information provided by Contango and its partner in the Peak Gold JV, KGMA. SR has not researched property title or mineral rights for the Manh Choh Project as we consider it reasonable to rely on Contango’s legal counsel who is responsible for maintaining this information.
The QP has relied on Bartly Kleven, Director of Environmental Affairs at Kinross Fort Knox, who oversees all environmental work for the Peak Gold JV, for the environmental matters in this TRS.
The QP has relied on Grant Thornton LLP (Contango’s tax adviser) for the calculation of income and mining taxes applicable to the economic analysis.
The QP has taken all appropriate steps, in their professional opinion, to ensure that the above information from Contango is sound. The QP does not disclaim any responsibility for the TRS. Except for the purposes legislated under US securities laws, any use of this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk.
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 25-1 |
|---|

- DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE
This report titled “Technical Report Summary on the Manh Choh Project, Alaska, USA” and dated was prepared and signed by:
| (Signed<br> & Sealed)<br> Sims<br> Resources LLC | |
|---|---|
| Dated<br> at Missoula,<br> MT | |
| May<br><br><br><br> 12, 2023 | Sims<br> Resources LLC |
| Contango<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> ORE, Inc. -<br> Manh Choh<br> Project<br><br> <br>Technical<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> Report Summary<br> - May 12, 2023 | Page<br> 26-1 |
| --- | --- |
Exhibit 99.1
Contango ORE Announces Completion of S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary for Its Manh Choh Project in Alaska
HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 26, 2023--Contango ORE, Inc. (“CORE,” “Contango” or the “Company”) (NYSE American: CTGO) is pleased to announce that it has completed the Technical Report Summary (“TRS”) on the Manh Choh Project (the “Project” or “Manh Choh”), located near Tok, Alaska, U.S.A.
Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer said: “With the completion of the tolling agreement with the Fort Knox Mine, we were able to complete the TRS. I am pleased to report that the results of the report are consistent with prior guidance including the estimated All-In Sustaining Cost (“AISC”) of $1,116 per gold equivalent ounce and the initial capital costs of $64.6 million for Contango’s 30% portion. With the major contracts signed and permitting concluded, we remain on track and on budget to bring our 30% interest in Manh Choh into production in the second half of 2024.”
With all the news flow expected throughout the month of May, we will be hosting a corporate update to go over all our recent news at the end of the month. Please use this link to register to our live event: https://my.6ix.com/STEXS5np
The TRS summarizes the results of a Feasibility Study (“FS”) and subsequent FS economic update prepared by KG Mining (Alaska), Inc. (“KGMA”), Contango’s joint venture partner for the Project and an indirect subsidiary of Kinross Gold Corporation (“Kinross”). CORE holds a 30% interest in Peak Gold, LLC (“Peak Gold JV”), which leases approximately 675,000 acres of exploration and development, with the remaining 70% owned by KGMA, operator and manager of the Project. Contango also owns a 100% interest in approximately 167,000 acres of State of Alaska mining claims through Contango Mineral Alaska, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary, which gives Contango the exclusive right to explore and develop minerals on these lands.
A copy of the S-K 1300 Feasibility Study for the Manh Choh project can be found on our website: https://www.contangoore.com/investors/overview.
Background:
- As a U.S. domestic and domiciled company, CORE is required to report its mineral resources in accordance with Item 1302 of Regulation S-K ("S-K 1300");
- S-K 1300 was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") to modernize mineral property disclosure requirements for mining registrants and to align U.S. disclosure requirements more closely for mineral properties with current industry and global regulatory standards; and
- The mineral resource estimate set forth in this TRS for the Manh Choh Project has not previously been reported under the S-K 1300 format.The TRS was prepared in accordance with S-K 1300 and was filed on May 26, 2023 with the SEC through EDGAR on Form 8-K.
Qualified Person Disclosure
The TRS was prepared in accordance with S-K 1300 and was filed on May 26, 2023 with the SEC through EDGAR on Form 8-K. The technical information in this news release has been reviewed by John Sims, AIPG Certified Professional Geologist, President of Sims Resources LLC (“SIMS”), being a Qualified Person under Item 1302 of Regulation S-K. SIMS prepared the TRS on behalf of the Company.
ABOUT CORE
CORE is a company that engages in the exploration in Alaska for gold and associated minerals through a 30% interest in PGJV, which leases approximately 675,000 acres for exploration and development, and through a 100% owned subsidiary, Contango Minerals Alaska, LLC, which leases approximately 200,000 acres for exploration. The Company also owns the rights to the Lucky Shot, Coleman and War Baby mines, and approximately 16,600 acres of surrounding mining claims located in the Willow Mining District about 75 miles north of Anchorage, Alaska. Additional information can be found on our web page at www.contangoore.com.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding CORE that are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for “forward-looking statements” provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, based on CORE’s current expectations and includes statements regarding future results of operations, quality and nature of the asset base, the assumptions upon which estimates are based and other expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, strategies or statements about future events or performance (often, but not always, using words such as “expects”, “projects”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “estimates”, “potential”, “possible”, “probable”, or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “will”, “should”, or “could” be taken, occur or be achieved). Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those, reflected in the statements. These risks include, but are not limited to: the risks of the exploration and the mining industry (for example, operational risks in exploring for, developing mineral reserves; risks and uncertainties involving geology; the speculative nature of the mining industry; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to future production, costs and expenses; the volatility of natural resources prices, including prices of gold and associated minerals; the existence and extent of commercially exploitable minerals in properties acquired by CORE or PGJV; ability to realize the anticipated benefits of PGJV; potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the interpretation of exploration results and the estimation of mineral resources; the loss of key employees or consultants; health, safety and environmental risks and risks related to weather and other natural disasters); uncertainties as to the availability and cost of financing; CORE’s inability to retain or maintain its relative ownership interest in PGJV; inability to realize expected value from acquisitions; inability of our management team to execute its plans to meet its goals; the extent of disruptions caused by the an outbreak of disease, such as the COVID-19 pandemic; and the possibility that government policies may change, political developments may occur or governmental approvals may be delayed or withheld, including as a result of presidential and congressional elections in the U.S. or the inability to obtain mining permits. Additional information on these and other factors which could affect CORE’s exploration program or financial results are included in CORE’s other reports on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from the projections in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the estimates and opinions of management at the time the statements are made. CORE does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements should circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions change.
Contacts
Contango ORE, Inc.
Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse
\(713\) 877-1311
www.contangoore.com
Exhibit 99.2
Contango ORE Set to Join Russell 3000® and Russell Microcap Indexes
HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 30, 2023--Contango ORE, Inc. (“CORE,” “Contango” or the “Company”) (NYSE American: CTGO) is pleased to announce that, according to a preliminary list of additions posted on May 19, 2023, Contango is set to join the broad-market Russell 3000® and Russell Microcap® Indexes at the conclusion of the 2023 Russell indexes annual reconstitution, effective after the US market opens on June 26, 2023.
Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer said: “We are pleased with Contango’s inclusion on the Russell 3000® index preliminary list as it marks another important milestone for the Company, and with it will bring broader market awareness for the Company as we advance the Manh Choh project to production.”
The annual reconstitution process for the Russell indexes captures the 4,000 largest U.S. stocks as of April 28, 2023, ranking them by total market capitalization. Membership in the U.S. All-Cap Russell 3000® Index, which remains in place for one year, means automatic inclusion in the Large-Cap Russell 1000® Index or Small-Cap Russell 2000® Index as well as the appropriate growth and value style indexes.
Russell indexes are widely used by investment managers and institutional investors for index funds and as benchmarks for active investment strategies. Approximately $12.1 trillion in assets are benchmarked against Russell's US indexes. Russell indexes are part of FTSE Russell, a leading global index provider.
For more information on the Russell Microcap® Index and the Russell indexes reconstitution, go to the "Russell Reconstitution" section on the FTSE Russell website.
With all the news flow expected throughout the month of May, we will be hosting a corporate update to go over all our recent news at the end of the month. Please use this link to register to our live event: https://my.6ix.com/STEXS5np
ABOUT CORE
CORE is a company that engages in the exploration in Alaska for gold and associated minerals through a 30% interest in Peak Gold LLC (“PGJV”), which leases approximately 675,000 acres for exploration and development, and through a 100% owned subsidiary, Contango Minerals Alaska, LLC, which leases approximately 200,000 acres for exploration. The Company also owns the rights to the Lucky Shot, Coleman and War Baby mines, and approximately 16,600 acres of surrounding mining claims located in the Willow Mining District about 75 miles north of Anchorage, Alaska. Additional information can be found on our web page at www.contangoore.com.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding CORE that are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for “forward-looking statements” provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, based on CORE’s current expectations and includes statements regarding future results of operations, quality and nature of the asset base, the assumptions upon which estimates are based and other expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, strategies or statements about future events or performance (often, but not always, using words such as “expects”, “projects”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “estimates”, “potential”, “possible”, “probable”, or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “will”, “should”, or “could” be taken, occur or be achieved). Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those, reflected in the statements. These risks include, but are not limited to: the risks of the exploration and the mining industry (for example, operational risks in exploring for, developing mineral reserves; risks and uncertainties involving geology; the speculative nature of the mining industry; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to future production, costs and expenses; the volatility of natural resources prices, including prices of gold and associated minerals; the existence and extent of commercially exploitable minerals in properties acquired by CORE or PGJV; ability to realize the anticipated benefits of PGJV; potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the interpretation of exploration results and the estimation of mineral resources; the loss of key employees or consultants; health, safety and environmental risks and risks related to weather and other natural disasters); uncertainties as to the availability and cost of financing; CORE’s inability to retain or maintain its relative ownership interest in PGJV; inability to realize expected value from acquisitions; inability of our management team to execute its plans to meet its goals; the extent of disruptions caused by the an outbreak of disease, such as the COVID-19 pandemic; and the possibility that government policies may change, political developments may occur or governmental approvals may be delayed or withheld, including as a result of presidential and congressional elections in the U.S. or the inability to obtain mining permits. Additional information on these and other factors which could affect CORE’s exploration program or financial results are included in CORE’s other reports on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from the projections in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the estimates and opinions of management at the time the statements are made. CORE does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements should circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions change.
Contacts
Contango ORE, Inc.
Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse
\(713\) 877-1311
www.contangoore.com