Earnings Call Transcript

Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN)

Earnings Call Transcript 2022-12-31 For: 2022-12-31
View Original
Added on April 06, 2026

Earnings Call Transcript - EPSN Q4 2022

Operator, Operator

Good morning. And welcome to the Epsilon Energy 2022 Year End Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Andrew Williamson, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Andrew Williamson, CFO

Thank you, Operator. And on behalf of the management team, I would like to welcome all of you to today’s conference call to review Epsilon’s fourth quarter and full year 2022 financial and operational results. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that our comments may include forward-looking statements. It should be noted that a variety of factors could cause Epsilon’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements. Today’s call may also contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the earnings release that we issued yesterday for disclosures on forward-looking statements and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures. With that, I’d like to turn the call over to Jason Stabell, our Chief Executive Officer.

Jason Stabell, CEO

Thank you, Andrew. Good morning to everyone and thank you for participating in our conference call. Joining me today are Andrew Williamson, our CFO; and Henry Clanton, our COO. We will be available to answer questions later in the call. I’m pleased to report that we delivered record profitability in 2022 and the company sits on a very solid foundation moving forward. Our positive results are largely due to the hard work of our team and I want to thank them for all their contributions. Here are some key highlights from 2022. Net revenue interest production was 27.3 MMcfe per day, down 6% year-over-year. We generated net income of $35.4 million, representing $1.51 per diluted share. Adjusted EBITDA grew 120% year-over-year to $53.1 million. Free cash flow before changes in working capital increased by 139% year-over-year to $35 million. We increased our cash balance year-over-year by 69% to $45.8 million, including restricted cash, representing $1.96 per diluted share. We returned $12.1 million to shareholders during the year through our quarterly dividend and share repurchases. We have a debt-free balance sheet with a growing cash position. Currently, we have available liquidity of approximately $75 million, comprised of $45 million in cash as of year-end and $30 million of undrawn borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility as of February this year. In 2022, we were largely unhedged, and as a result, we were able to capitalize on higher commodity prices during the year. Our average realized price for the year, including hedges, was $6.09 per Mcfe. Realized prices were significantly higher year-over-year with natural gas realizations nearly doubling. The combination of sustained production and increased pricing resulted in a record adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow. This year’s $53 million of adjusted EBITDA compares to $40 million for the full year of 2021 and 2020 combined. We generated over $20 million in incremental free cash flow before changes in working capital over last year. Moving on to our assets. In Pennsylvania, five gross wells, 0.05 net were drilled and four gross wells, 0.21 net were completed during the year. The most notable was the Koromlan 107HC, which came online in August 2022. The well has produced strongly with cumulative production of 5.9 Bcf in just over four months in 2022. We have a 16% net revenue interest in the well. The Koromlan is a long lateral, nearly 14,000 feet completed in the Lower Marcellus and demonstrates the potential of our remaining drilling inventory in Auburn. We incurred $3 million in capital expenditures related to our Marcellus upstream assets, primarily attributable to the Koromlan well. While we do not operate, we will continue to work with the operator to develop the substantial remaining inventory. In Oklahoma, production was up to 2.6 MMcfe per day, a 30% increase over last year as we participated in the drilling of two gross wells, 0.26 net and the completion of three gross wells, 0.7 net for a total capital cost of $4 million net to Epsilon. One of the wells drilled in 2022 is awaiting completion in the first half of this year. Our Oklahoma assets accounted for 13% of our upstream revenues during the year. These assets remain solid contributors with a mix of natural gas, oil, and natural gas liquids. Our Auburn Gas Gathering System provides us with a steady stream of revenue and cash flow. Throughput in the system was up 5% compared to the prior year, which contributed to higher midstream revenues, up 3% year-over-year. Our midstream earnings growth potential is highly leveraged to incremental development in the Auburn area. Turning to our year-end reserve results. I would like to point out that we do not operate our upstream assets, and as a result, we often have limited visibility on future development plans. We use best estimates based on the information from operators and our team’s view on the optimized development plan for returns. In the latest reserve report, we reduced estimated near-term capital expenditures based on discussions with our operators. This change resulted in a portion of our prior PUDs shifting outside the five-year SEC window required for proved classification. However, our total resource estimates did not change. We believe the current assumed pace of development will likely eliminate the need for any similar downward adjustments in future years. We continue to believe that our acreage is of the highest quality, as demonstrated by our 2022 results, and we will continue to work constructively with our partners to best realize the value of our assets. For year-end 2022, we reported SEC proved reserves of 94.3 Bcfe, which included an increase of 7.2 Bcfe in improved developed producing reserves, comprised of 9.9 Bcfe of positive performance revisions and an increase of 7.3 Bcfe due to the new wells completed. These additions were partially offset by 10 Bcfe of production. We saw the impact of the five-year SEC booking rule in our PUD reserves. We had a 23.5 Bcfe reduction from previous estimates due to the aforementioned change in our development timing assumptions. We anticipate reclassifying these reserves back to proved once we have line of sight on development timing. Despite the reclassification of these PUD reserves, we saw a significant increase in our overall PV10 value, driven by higher SEC pricing. The PV10 value of our SEC proved reserves at year-end 2022 increased by $85 million to $193 million. Approximately 95% of year-end 2022 SEC proved reserves were natural gas, 3% NGLs, and 2% crude oil. The reserves were classified as 86% proved developed producing and 14% proved undeveloped. We have a solid asset base that will continue to provide meaningful cash flow to our shareholders for many years. As we look ahead in 2023, we are focused on continuing to deliver strong results. We believe that Epsilon is well positioned for continued success in a variety of commodity price environments. In late December, we hedged over 1 Bcf of 2023 production for the April to October period at a net realized price of $3.96 per MMcf. We remain focused on returning capital to our shareholders through our dividend and share buyback programs. To that end, yesterday, we announced a new buyback program, which will run for 12 months. We have increased the cap to 10% of shares outstanding or 2.3 million shares, our regulatory limit. Finally, our strong balance sheet positions us to actively pursue accretive business development opportunities. Our initial focus has been in Appalachia, where our deep knowledge and long history in the basin distinguish us from other small to midsize companies. However, we will also consider opportunities in other basins, if attractive and consistent with our strategy. We believe that the recent volatility in commodity prices could help augment the number of attractive opportunities in the A&D and farm-out markets. We believe that our ability to quickly evaluate and execute on opportunities makes us an attractive counterparty. We are excited about the future and remain focused on creating value for our shareholders. This includes working closely with our operators on our existing assets, ongoing business development efforts, and better highlighting the attractive value proposition of our shares to the investment community. Operator, we can now open the lines for questions.

Operator, Operator

Thank you. And the first question will be from Tom McIntyre from MFS. Please go ahead.

Unidentified Analyst, Analyst

Good morning, all. Thank you for the update. I have two things. You mentioned looking at basins in the Marcellus, I think you talked about it on the last call, but given the price of natural gas, and obviously, your hedging move was a good one. What’s your thinking about that? I just don’t see how you can be, and if you’re not the operator, how you would want to risk more capital into this sort of market at this time? That’s one thing. And it kind of leads me to my second question would be, last year, as you reported, you spent $6 million or $7 million buying back stock, but the number of shares really didn’t fall hardly at all. This year is a larger buyback, and as a shareholder, I’m interested in seeing that share count fall. So maybe you could address that. Obviously, you had something to do with option expiration, and I don’t know what the level and pace for that might be in the New Year. But the two in terms of capital allocation, whether investing in basins or buying your own shares seem to be somewhat related while we have natural gas at these prices? Thank you.

Jason Stabell, CEO

Hi, Tom. Thank you for joining and for your questions. Regarding your first question about Marcellus investment opportunities, the recent changes in natural gas prices have created challenges for various investment options in that area. We maintain a disciplined approach to our cost of capital, and we are evaluating opportunities. If we find options that align with our criteria, we would definitely consider them. There are likely fewer parties actively seeking to acquire assets now, so our opportunities may lean more towards farm-outs. That's speculative, but those looking to maintain drilling operations might provide us with chances. Overall, there seems to be a consensus that we are in a transitional phase for natural gas, but the medium- to long-term outlook remains strong. We will continue to explore options, and as we mentioned earlier, we are also open to incoming investments. Our solid balance sheet and ability to act quickly position us well to receive various opportunities from other investment areas. We are keeping ourselves engaged, but you make a good point that the current environment for natural gas is more challenging. Regarding your question about buybacks, the year-over-year share count was heavily influenced by the management transition last year, which led to a number of shares being accelerated. This had a significant impact on our issuance. Without that, we might have seen a more meaningful decrease in share count. With the buyback program active this year, if we identify attractive opportunities to purchase our stock, it would help reduce the overall number of shares outstanding.

Unidentified Analyst, Analyst

Thank you. I wanted to ask whether the new management plans to maintain or alter the dividend policy. I noticed in your press release that you addressed this and emphasized it as part of your positive outlook regarding capital allocation for the company moving forward. Is that an accurate interpretation of what you intended to convey in the press release?

Jason Stabell, CEO

I’d say this, the Board is very comfortable with the dividend where it is, and obviously, that’s something we continue to evaluate, but we feel real strong about where we are on the dividend going forward.

Unidentified Analyst, Analyst

Okay.

Andrew Williamson, CFO

That’s our imagination.

Unidentified Analyst, Analyst

Thanks very much.

Andrew Williamson, CFO

Tom, this is Andrew. That dividend is underwritten by our earnings from the midstream system. That’s how we think about it.

Unidentified Analyst, Analyst

Yeah. I just didn’t know…

Andrew Williamson, CFO

It’s not affected by where the price is…

Unidentified Analyst, Analyst

... would revisit the whole concept of a company like you folks paying a dividend, but so I was curious as to what you’re and then you trumpeted, like I said in the press release, so I thought that put on sounder footing. But I just wanted to ask.

Andrew Williamson, CFO

Thanks.

Jason Stabell, CEO

Thank you.

Operator, Operator

The next question is from Nat Stewart from N.A.S. Capital. Please go ahead.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

Good morning, guys.

Jason Stabell, CEO

Hi, Nat.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

I just had a few questions. One is just a little accounting change, I noticed on the gathering system. I was curious why you did that. It looks like you allocated some of the kind of costs that net out from the upstream to the gathering system, is that correct? I mean, I think I saw that. I was just curious if there is a reason for that or what that was about?

Andrew Williamson, CFO

Yeah. Nat, thank you for the question. This is Andrew. Yeah. That’s correct. We changed the way we do that elimination for the gathering fees that we pay to Epsilon’s ownership and the gathering system. The appropriate way to do that is it’s a net of gathering system revenue and its upstream operating costs because it’s a gathering fee. Previously, that had been netted out of upstream operating costs rather than gathering system operating costs.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

Okay.

Andrew Williamson, CFO

This is a new mechanism. This is the appropriate way to do it. Yeah.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

So if I…

Andrew Williamson, CFO

Yeah.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

If I were to consider a scenario where you only had a partial ownership in the pipeline and did not own the upstream portion, how should I evaluate the revenue and costs associated with that without considering the various netting effects? Would the revenue amount to $9.6 million, and then you would subtract an amount for the related expenses?

Andrew Williamson, CFO

Yeah. There’s $1.5 million in additional gathering revenue.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

Okay. And on the cost side, would that…

Andrew Williamson, CFO

The cost part would be the same because we’re now netting that out of upstream costs.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

Okay. All right.

Andrew Williamson, CFO

On the gathering system OpEx would be the same.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

Okay. Now in terms of your investment outlook, I guess I had that pretty well covered. Are you looking at kind of all-size deals, because you have a pretty substantial capacity here? I assume if something substantial came up, you could have a pretty good capacity relative to your current asset base to buy something. Are you looking at kind of all sized deals or are you looking at how does the ability to put a decent amount of money to work look?

Andrew Williamson, CFO

It will depend on the opportunity. But, yeah, I think we’re... There aren’t many advantages to being a small-cap energy company. But for us, that balance sheet and having the flexibility that it provides, I think, is an advantage for us in considering a variety of different opportunities, large and small. Small things move the needle for us, but we’re certainly open to larger opportunities that make sense for the shareholders.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

Yeah. I agree with that. And I think really to succeed as a public company, building that kind of operating leverage with some substantial investments would make a big difference. In terms of hedging, is there anything you’ve done since December that wasn’t mentioned or is that your full hedge position?

Andrew Williamson, CFO

That’s the complete hedge position. Back in December, I anticipated some potential softness over the summer. It’s challenging to take an aggressive approach to hedging with our balance sheet. However, we believed the risk-reward ratio, around a 525 Henry Hub, compared to the downside potential in price justified implementing the hedges in hindsight.

Nat Stewart, Analyst

Yeah. Yeah. I think that must have caught a lot of people by surprise, obviously. So, yeah, that sounds great. Keep it up and I look forward to seeing what you guys come up with. Thanks for answering my questions.

Andrew Williamson, CFO

Thanks, Nat.

Jason Stabell, CEO

Thanks, Nat.

Operator, Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jason Stabell for any closing remarks.

Jason Stabell, CEO

Thanks, Chad. On behalf of the company, I want to thank everybody for their interest in Epsilon. If you have any additional questions, feel free to contact us. And I’d also like to highlight we have a refreshed website that we launched today and we expect in the early part of the second quarter to be posting an updated corporate presentation on the website as well. So look out for that, and again, everybody have a great weekend. Thank you.

Operator, Operator

And thank you, sir. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.