RSKIA 10-K/A
George Risk Industries, Inc. (RSKIA)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM
Amendment No. 1
| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the fiscal year ended
| TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to _________
Commission
File Number:
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| (State of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s
telephone number
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class | Name of Exchange on Which Registered | |
| None | None |
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
| OTC Markets | ||||
| OTC Markets |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
| Yes ☐ |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Sections 15(d) of the Act.
| Yes ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
| No ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229-405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
| No ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ | ||
| Smaller
reporting company | |||
| Emerging
growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the
registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
If
securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant
included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
| Yes ☐ | No
|
Based
on the closing sale price on October 31, 2024, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates (assuming, for this
purpose, that all directors, officers and owners of 5% or more of the registrant’s common stock are deemed affiliates) of the registrant
was $
The number of outstanding shares of the common stock as of August 22, 2025, was .
Explanatory Note
Except as described above, no changes have been made to the Original Filing and this Amendment No. 1 does not modify, amend or update in any way any other information contained in the Original Filing. This Amendment No. 1 does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the date the Original Filing was filed with the SEC.
Pursuant to Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Amendment No. 1 also contains new certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Because no financial statements have been included in this Amendment No. 1 and this Amendment No. 1 does not contain or amend any disclosure with respect to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K, paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of those certifications have been omitted.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of George Risk Industries, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Critical Audit Matter – Inventory Valuation
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company manufactures its inventory, which involves the capture of direct labor and manufacturing overhead costs to inventory instead of as an expense when valuing work-in-process and finished goods inventory. This process involves complex calculations based on employee hours worked on manufacturing inventory, and the amount of overhead that will be captured is based on management’s subjective judgments. These judgments can have a significant impact on the Company’s reported assets and earnings if they should prove to be significantly inaccurate.
How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit
Our principal procedures related to the Company’s valuation of work-in-process and finished goods inventory included the following:
| ● | We evaluated management’s significant accounting policies related to the valuation of manufactured inventory, including the methodology of how manufactured overhead is applied to inventory. | |
| ● | We tested the direct labor applied to a sample of work-in-process and finished goods inventory items by agreeing employees’ applied costs to their pay rates per their human resources file maintained by the company. | |
| ● | We tested the application of manufacturing overhead to a sample of work-in-process and finished goods inventory by recalculating the overhead we would expect to be applied based on the company’s standard overhead rate and the number of direct labor hours applied to the inventory. |
Critical Audit Matter – Valuation of Investments
Critical Audit Matter Description
The company has investments in publicly traded equity securities, state and municipal debt securities, REITS, and money markets and they are recorded at fair value. Some of these investments are Level 2 investments and can be hard to value. In addition, as the securities are held at fair value, management must assess securities that are in a significant unrealized loss position for other than temporary impairment. For these securities, management must make difficult and subjective judgments about the ability of the issuer to be able to meet its obligations under terms of the security. These judgments can have a significant impact on the Company’s reported earnings if they should prove to be significantly inaccurate.
How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit
Our principal procedures related to the Company’s process for debt securities valuations as well as the process for equity securities other than temporary impairment evaluation included are the following:
| ● | We evaluated management’s significant accounting policies related to the identification of other than temporary impairment. | |
| ● | Valuation specialists, with specialized skills and knowledge, were involved in the assessment of the fair values for a sample of Level 2 investments. | |
| ● | We performed testing over a sample of securities to determine if conclusions reached by management regarding other than temporary impairment were appropriate. |
| August 12, 2025 | |
| PCAOD
# |
|
| We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1992 |
Item 15 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
| 31.1 | Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| /s/ STEPHANIE M. RISK-MCELROY | August 22, 2025 | |
STEPHANIE M. RISK-MCELROY |
Date | |
| President and Chairman of the Board |