UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2023

or

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-03683

Trustmark Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Mississippi	64-0471500
(State or other jurisdiction of<br>incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer<br>Identification No.)
248 East Capitol Street, Jackson, Mississippi	39201
---	---
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(601) 208-5111

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, no par value	TRMK	Nasdaq Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of July 31, 2023, there were 61,070,095 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock (no par value).

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “hope,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “seek,” “continue,” “could,” “would,” “future” or the negative of those terms or other words of similar meaning. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our future expectations or state other “forward-looking” information. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to anticipated future operating and financial performance measures, including net interest margin, credit quality, business initiatives, growth opportunities and growth rates, among other things, and encompass any estimate, prediction, expectation, projection, opinion, anticipation, outlook or statement of belief included therein as well as the management assumptions underlying these forward-looking statements. You should be aware that the occurrence of the events described under the caption “Risk Factors” in Trustmark’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Should one or more of these risks materialize, or should any such underlying assumptions prove to be significantly different, actual results may vary significantly from those anticipated, estimated, projected or expected.

Risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations of Management include, but are not limited to, changes in the level of nonperforming assets and charge-offs, an increase in unemployment levels and slowdowns in economic growth, actions by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) that impact the level of market interest rates, local, state and national economic and market conditions, conditions in the housing and real estate markets in the regions in which Trustmark operates and the extent and duration of the current volatility in the credit and financial markets, levels of and volatility in crude oil prices, changes in our ability to measure the fair value of assets in our portfolio, material changes in the level and/or volatility of market interest rates, the impacts related to or resulting from recent bank failures and other economic and industry volatility, including potential increased regulatory requirements and costs and potential impacts to macroeconomic conditions, the performance and demand for the products and services we offer, including the level and timing of withdrawals from our deposit accounts, the costs and effects of litigation and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigation, our ability to attract noninterest-bearing deposits and other low-cost funds, competition in loan and deposit pricing, as well as the entry of new competitors into our markets through de novo expansion and acquisitions, economic conditions, including the potential impact of issues related to the European financial system and monetary and other governmental actions designed to address credit, securities, and/or commodity markets, the enactment of legislation and changes in existing regulations or enforcement practices or the adoption of new regulations, changes in accounting standards and practices, including changes in the interpretation of existing standards, that affect our consolidated financial statements, changes in consumer spending, borrowings and savings habits, technological changes, changes in the financial performance or condition of our borrowers, changes in our ability to control expenses, greater than expected costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquisitions or new products and lines of business, cyber-attacks and other breaches which could affect our information system security, natural disasters, environmental disasters, pandemics or other health crises, acts of war or terrorism, and other risks described in our filings with the SEC.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of this information, whether as the result of new information, future events or developments or otherwise.

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

($ in thousands)

			December 31, 2022
Assets
Cash and due from banks	832,052		$	734,787
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under reverse repurchase agreements	—			4,000
Securities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2,107,609 - 2023   2,270,709 - 2022; allowance for credit losses (ACL): 0)	1,871,883			2,024,082
Securities held to maturity, net of ACL of 0   (fair value: 1,366,377 - 2023; 1,406,589 - 2022)	1,458,665			1,494,514
Loans held for sale (LHFS)	181,094			135,226
Loans held for investment (LHFI)	12,613,967			12,204,039
Less ACL, LHFI	129,298			120,214
Net LHFI	12,484,669			12,083,825
Premises and equipment, net	227,630			212,365
Mortgage servicing rights (MSR)	134,350			129,677
Goodwill	384,237			384,237
Identifiable intangible assets, net	3,222			3,640
Other real estate, net	1,137			1,986
Operating lease right-of-use assets	38,179			36,301
Other assets	805,508			770,838
Total Assets	18,422,626		$	18,015,478
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	3,461,073		$	4,093,771
Interest-bearing	11,452,827			10,343,877
Total deposits	14,913,900			14,437,648
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements	311,179			449,331
Other borrowings	1,056,714			1,050,938
Subordinated notes	123,372			123,262
Junior subordinated debt securities	61,856			61,856
ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures	34,841			36,838
Operating lease liabilities	40,845			38,932
Other liabilities	308,726			324,405
Total Liabilities	16,851,433			16,523,210
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock, no par value:
Authorized: 250,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding: 61,069,036 shares - 2023; 60,977,686 shares - 2022	12,724			12,705
Capital surplus	156,834			154,645
Retained earnings	1,667,339			1,600,321
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(265,704	)		(275,403	)
Total Shareholders' Equity	1,571,193			1,492,268
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	18,422,626		$	18,015,478

All values are in US Dollars.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

($ in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022			2023			2022
Interest Income
Interest and fees on LHFS & LHFI	$	189,573	$	100,139		$	365,082		$	190,414
Interest and fees on PPP loans		—		184			—			352
Interest on securities:
Taxable		16,779		14,561			33,540			26,918
Tax exempt		54		85			127			181
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased under reverse<br>   repurchase agreements		45		1			75			1
Other interest income		12,077		2,214			18,604			3,031
Total Interest Income		218,528		117,184			417,428			220,897
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits		54,409		2,774			95,307			5,534
Interest on federal funds purchased and securities sold under<br>   repurchase agreements		4,865		70			9,697			140
Other interest expense		19,350		1,664			34,925			3,203
Total Interest Expense		78,624		4,508			139,929			8,877
Net Interest Income		139,904		112,676			277,499			212,020
Provision for credit losses (PCL), LHFI		8,211		2,716			11,455			1,856
PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures		245		(1,568	)		(1,997	)		(2,674	)
Net Interest Income After PCL		131,448		111,528			268,041			212,838
Noninterest Income
Service charges on deposit accounts		10,695		10,226			21,031			19,677
Bank card and other fees		8,917		10,167			16,720			18,609
Mortgage banking, net		6,600		8,149			14,239			18,022
Insurance commissions		14,764		13,702			29,069			27,791
Wealth management		8,882		9,102			17,662			18,156
Other, net		3,695		1,907			6,209			5,113
Total Noninterest Income		53,553		53,253			104,930			107,368
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		75,940		71,679			149,996			141,264
Services and fees (1)		28,264		25,659			53,690			50,973
Net occupancy - premises		7,108		6,892			14,737			13,971
Equipment expense		6,404		6,047			12,809			12,108
Other expense (1)		14,502		13,490			29,313			26,970
Total Noninterest Expense		132,218		123,767			260,545			245,286
Income Before Income Taxes		52,783		41,014			112,426			74,920
Income taxes		7,746		6,730			17,089			11,425
Net Income	$	45,037	$	34,284		$	95,337		$	63,495
Earnings Per Share
Basic	$	0.74	$	0.56		$	1.56		$	1.03
Diluted	$	0.74	$	0.56		$	1.56		$	1.03

(1) During the first quarter of 2023, Trustmark reclassified its debit card transaction fees from other expense to services and fees.

The prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Net income per consolidated statements of income	$	45,037		$	34,284		$	95,337		$	63,495
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities and<br>   transferred securities:
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the<br>   period		(14,723	)		(33,397	)		8,407			(150,150	)
Change in net unrealized holding loss on securities<br>   transferred to held to maturity		2,955			(25,338	)		5,849			(24,938	)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:
Reclassification adjustments for changes realized in net<br>   income:
Net change in prior service costs		20			21			41			41
Recognized net loss due to lump sum settlement		—			—			19			—
Change in net actuarial loss		52			228			110			465
Derivatives:
Change in the accumulated gain (loss) on effective cash<br>   flow hedge derivatives		(14,625	)		—			(9,923	)		—
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss realized in <br>   net income		2,998			—			5,196			—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(23,323	)		(58,486	)		9,699			(174,582	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	21,714		$	(24,202	)	$	105,036		$	(111,087	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

($ in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

										Accumulated
										Other
										Comprehensive
				Capital			Retained			Income
		Amount		Surplus			Earnings			(Loss)			Total
Balance, January 1, 2023	60,977,686	$	12,705	$	154,645		$	1,600,321		$	(275,403	)	$	1,492,268
Net income per consolidated statements   of income	—		—		—			50,300			—			50,300
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—		—			—			33,022			33,022
Common stock dividends paid    (0.23 per share)	—		—		—			(14,158	)		—			(14,158	)
Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term   incentive plan	70,830		15		(1,063	)		—			—			(1,048	)
Compensation expense, long-term   incentive plan	—		—		1,715			—			—			1,715
Balance, March 31, 2023	61,048,516		12,720		155,297			1,636,463			(242,381	)		1,562,099
Net income per consolidated statements   of income	—		—		—			45,037			—			45,037
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—		—			—			(23,323	)		(23,323	)
Common stock dividends paid    (0.23 per share)	—		—		—			(14,161	)		—			(14,161	)
Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term   incentive plan	20,520		4		(26	)		—			—			(22	)
Compensation expense, long-term   incentive plan	—		—		1,563			—			—			1,563
Balance, June 30, 2023	61,069,036	$	12,724	$	156,834		$	1,667,339		$	(265,704	)	$	1,571,193

All values are in US Dollars.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (continued)

($ in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

												Accumulated
												Other
												Comprehensive
						Capital			Retained			Income
			Amount			Surplus			Earnings			(Loss)			Total
Balance, January 1, 2022	61,648,679		$	12,845		$	175,913		$	1,585,113		$	(32,560	)	$	1,741,311
Net income per consolidated statements   of income	—			—			—			29,211			—			29,211
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—			—			—			—			(116,096	)		(116,096	)
Common stock dividends paid (0.23 per share)	—			—			—			(14,186	)		—			(14,186	)
Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term   incentive plan	93,944			19			(1,028	)		—			—			(1,009	)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(279,231	)		(58	)		(9,036	)		—			—			(9,094	)
Compensation expense, long-term   incentive plan	—			—			1,245			—			—			1,245
Balance, March 31, 2022	61,463,392			12,806			167,094			1,600,138			(148,656	)		1,631,382
Net income per consolidated statements   of income	—			—			—			34,284			—			34,284
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—			—			—			—			(58,486	)		(58,486	)
Common stock dividends paid (0.23 per share)	—			—			—			(14,212	)		—			(14,212	)
Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term   incentive plan	513			—			(7	)		—			—			(7	)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(262,782	)		(54	)		(7,451	)		—			—			(7,505	)
Compensation expense, long-term   incentive plan	—			—			1,240			—			—			1,240
Balance, June 30, 2022	61,201,123		$	12,752		$	160,876		$	1,620,210		$	(207,142	)	$	1,586,696

All values are in US Dollars.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022
Operating Activities
Net income per consolidated statements of income	$	95,337		$	63,495
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
PCL		9,458			(818	)
Depreciation and amortization		16,448			20,685
Net amortization of securities		3,331			6,672
Gains on sales of loans, net		(6,749	)		(14,971	)
Compensation expense, long-term incentive plan		3,278			2,485
Deferred income tax provision		(380	)		9,100
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		556,031			726,028
Purchases and originations of loans held for sale		(613,829	)		(643,267	)
Originations of mortgage servicing rights		(6,602	)		(10,159	)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		(2,531	)		(2,417	)
Net change in other assets		(7,525	)		982
Net change in other liabilities		8,848			23,876
Other operating activities, net		(28,779	)		(31,022	)
Net cash from operating activities		26,336			150,669
Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of securities held to maturity		52,451			69,807
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of securities available for sale		160,240			253,655
Purchases of securities held to maturity		(8,967	)		(555,191	)
Purchases of securities available for sale		—			(209,100	)
Net proceeds from bank-owned life insurance		(27	)		307
Net change in federal funds sold and securities purchased <br>   under reverse repurchase agreements		4,000			—
Net change in member bank stock		(20,248	)		(112	)
Net change in LHFI and PPP loans		(412,869	)		(674,854	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(25,594	)		(13,881	)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment		1,815			4,926
Proceeds from sales of other real estate		1,154			1,413
Purchases of software		(4,955	)		(3,664	)
Investments in tax credit and other partnerships		(9,237	)		(16,176	)
Net cash from investing activities		(262,237	)		(1,142,870	)
Financing Activities
Net change in deposits		476,252			(316,992	)
Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		(138,152	)		(168,420	)
Net change in short-term borrowings		25,000			—
Payments on long-term FHLB advances		(10	)		(9	)
Payments under finance lease obligations		(535	)		(733	)
Common stock dividends		(28,319	)		(28,398	)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock		—			(16,599	)
Shares withheld to pay taxes, long-term incentive plan		(1,070	)		(1,016	)
Net cash from financing activities		333,166			(532,167	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		97,265			(1,524,368	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		734,787			2,266,829
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	832,052		$	742,461

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Trustmark Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Business, Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark) is a bank holding company headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi. Through its subsidiaries, Trustmark operates as a financial services organization providing banking and financial solutions to corporate institutions and individual customers through offices in Alabama (includes the Georgia Loan Production Office), Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Trustmark and all other entities in which Trustmark has a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, included in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (2022 Annual Report).

Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period. In the opinion of Management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for the fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these accounting principles requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and income and expense during the reporting periods and the related disclosures. Although Management’s estimates contemplate current conditions and how they are expected to change in the future, it is reasonably possible that in 2023 actual conditions could vary from those anticipated, which could affect Trustmark’s financial condition and results of operations. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 2 – Securities Available for Sale and Held to Maturity

The following tables are a summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale and held to maturity at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	Securities Available for Sale									Securities Held to Maturity
June 30, 2023	Amortized<br>Cost		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Gains		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Losses			Estimated<br>Fair<br>Value		Amortized<br>Cost		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Gains		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Losses			Estimated<br>Fair<br>Value
U.S. Treasury securities	$	395,961	$	—	$	(32,995	)	$	362,966	$	28,679	$	—	$	(365	)	$	28,314
U.S. Government agency<br>   obligations		7,516		—		(517	)		6,999		—		—		—			—
Obligations of states and<br>   political subdivisions		4,788		36		(11	)		4,813		1,180		1		—			1,181
Mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage pass-<br>   through securities
Guaranteed by GNMA		28,513		2		(3,179	)		25,336		13,235		—		(483	)		12,752
Issued by FNMA and<br>   FHLMC		1,438,588		1		(188,154	)		1,250,435		484,679		—		(22,547	)		462,132
Other residential mortgage-<br>   backed securities
Issued or guaranteed by<br>   FNMA, FHLMC or<br>   GNMA		106,701		—		(8,313	)		98,388		171,002		—		(13,759	)		157,243
Commercial mortgage-backed<br>   securities
Issued or guaranteed by<br>   FNMA, FHLMC or<br>   GNMA		125,542		1		(2,597	)		122,946		759,890		10		(55,145	)		704,755
Total	$	2,107,609	$	40	$	(235,766	)	$	1,871,883	$	1,458,665	$	11	$	(92,299	)	$	1,366,377

9

---

	Securities Available for Sale									Securities Held to Maturity
December 31, 2022	Amortized<br>Cost		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Gains		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Losses			Estimated<br>Fair<br>Value		Amortized<br>Cost		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Gains		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Losses			Estimated<br>Fair<br>Value
U.S. Treasury Securities	$	425,719	$	308	$	(34,514	)	$	391,513	$	28,295	$	—	$	(115	)	$	28,180
U.S. Government agency<br>   obligations		8,297		—		(531	)		7,766		—		—		—			—
Obligations of states and<br>   political subdivisions		4,820		53		(11	)		4,862		4,510		3		(3	)		4,510
Mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage pass-<br>   through securities
Guaranteed by GNMA		30,534		7		(3,444	)		27,097		4,442		—		(395	)		4,047
Issued by FNMA and<br>   FHLMC		1,541,570		12		(196,119	)		1,345,463		509,311		—		(19,586	)		489,725
Other residential mortgage-<br>   backed securities
Issued or guaranteed by<br>   FNMA, FHLMC or<br>   GNMA		123,755		—		(8,615	)		115,140		188,201		—		(13,826	)		174,375
Commercial mortgage-backed<br>   securities
Issued or guaranteed by<br>   FNMA, FHLMC or<br>   GNMA		136,014		—		(3,773	)		132,241		759,755		34		(54,037	)		705,752
Total	$	2,270,709	$	380	$	(247,007	)	$	2,024,082	$	1,494,514	$	37	$	(87,962	)	$	1,406,589

During 2022, Trustmark reclassified a total of $766.0 million of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity. At the date of these transfers, the net unrealized holding loss on the available for sale securities totaled approximately $91.9 million ($68.9 million, net of tax).

The securities were transferred at fair value, which became the cost basis for the securities held to maturity. The net unrealized holding loss will be amortized over the remaining life of the securities as a yield adjustment in a manner consistent with the amortization or accretion of the original purchase premium or discount on the associated security. There were no gains or losses recognized as a result of these transfers. At June 30, 2023, the net unamortized, unrealized loss on transferred securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying balance sheet totaled $63.4 million compared to $69.2 million at December 31, 2022.

ACL on Securities

Securities Available for Sale

Quarterly, Trustmark evaluates if any security has a fair value less than its amortized cost. Once these securities are identified, in order to determine whether a decline in fair value resulted from a credit loss or other factors, Trustmark performs further analysis. If Trustmark determines that a credit loss exists, the credit portion of the allowance is measured using a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis using the effective interest rate as of the security’s purchase date. The amount of credit loss recorded by Trustmark is limited to the amount by which the amortized cost exceeds the fair value. The DCF analysis utilizes contractual maturities, as well as third-party credit ratings and cumulative default rates published annually by Moody’s Investor Service (Moody’s).

At both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the results of the analysis did not identify any securities that warranted DCF analysis, and no credit loss was recognized on any of the securities available for sale.

Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses for securities available for sale. At June 30, 2023, accrued interest receivable totaled $3.8 million for securities available for sale compared to $4.0 million at December 31, 2022 and was reported in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

Securities Held to Maturity

At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the potential for credit loss exposure for Trustmark's securities held to maturity was $1.2 million and $4.5 million, respectively, and consisted of municipal securities. After applying appropriate probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) assumptions, the total amount of current expected credit losses was deemed immaterial. Therefore, no reserve was recorded at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

10

---

Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses for securities held to maturity. At June 30, 2023, accrued interest receivable totaled $2.6 million for securities held to maturity compared to $2.7 million at December 31, 2022 and was reported in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

At both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, Trustmark had no securities held to maturity that were past due 30 days or more as to principal or interest payments. Trustmark had no securities held to maturity classified as nonaccrual at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Trustmark monitors the credit quality of securities held to maturity on a monthly basis through credit ratings. The following table presents the amortized cost of Trustmark’s securities held to maturity by credit rating, as determined by Moody’s, at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Aaa	$	1,457,485	$	1,490,004
Aa1 to Aa3		—		3,001
Not Rated (1)		1,180		1,509
Total	$	1,458,665	$	1,494,514

(1) Not rated securities primarily consist of Mississippi municipal general obligations.

The tables below include securities with gross unrealized losses for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded segregated by length of impairment at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
June 30, 2023	Estimated<br>Fair Value		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Losses			Estimated<br>Fair Value		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Losses			Estimated<br>Fair Value		Gross<br>Unrealized<br>Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	42,183	$	(1,034	)	$	349,097	$	(32,326	)	$	391,280	$	(33,360	)
U.S. Government agency obligations		—		—			6,949		(517	)		6,949		(517	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		1,008		(11	)		—		—			1,008		(11	)
Mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage pass-through<br>   securities
Guaranteed by GNMA		5,161		(174	)		27,374		(3,488	)		32,535		(3,662	)
Issued by FNMA and FHLMC		321,261		(5,059	)		1,391,292		(205,642	)		1,712,553		(210,701	)
Other residential mortgage-backed<br>   securities
Issued or guaranteed by FNMA,<br>   FHLMC or GNMA		3,847		(208	)		251,599		(21,864	)		255,446		(22,072	)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
Issued or guaranteed by FNMA,<br>   FHLMC or GNMA		51,636		(32,380	)		311,703		(25,362	)		363,339		(57,742	)
Total	$	425,096	$	(38,866	)	$	2,338,014	$	(289,199	)	$	2,763,110	$	(328,065	)
December 31, 2022
U.S. Treasury Securities	$	161,298	$	(5,655	)	$	258,087	$	(28,974	)	$	419,385	$	(34,629	)
U.S. Government agency obligations		1,828		(184	)		5,938		(347	)		7,766		(531	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		1,017		(11	)		3,664		(3	)		4,681		(14	)
Mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage pass-through<br>   securities
Guaranteed by GNMA		27,223		(3,270	)		3,577		(569	)		30,800		(3,839	)
Issued by FNMA and FHLMC		770,865		(41,807	)		1,062,041		(173,898	)		1,832,906		(215,705	)
Other residential mortgage-backed<br>   securities
Issued or guaranteed by FNMA,<br>   FHLMC or GNMA		281,964		(21,452	)		7,235		(989	)		289,199		(22,441	)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
Issued or guaranteed by FNMA,<br>   FHLMC or GNMA		833,970		(57,742	)		1,644		(68	)		835,614		(57,810	)
Total	$	2,078,165	$	(130,121	)	$	1,342,186	$	(204,848	)	$	3,420,351	$	(334,969	)

11

---

The unrealized losses shown above are due to increases in market rates over the yields available at the time of purchase of the underlying securities and not credit quality. Trustmark does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that Trustmark will not be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be at maturity.

Securities Gains and Losses

During the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, there were no gross realized gains or losses as a result of calls and dispositions of securities. Realized gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method and are included in noninterest income as securities gains (losses), net.

Securities Pledged

Securities with a carrying value of $2.296 billion and $2.693 billion at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, were pledged to collateralize public deposits and securities sold under repurchase agreements and for other purposes as permitted by law. At both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, none of these securities were pledged under the Federal Reserve Discount Window program to provide additional contingency funding capacity.

Contractual Maturities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale and held to maturity at June 30, 2023, by contractual maturity, are shown below ($ in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Securities<br>Available for Sale				Securities<br>Held to Maturity
	Amortized<br>Cost		Estimated<br>Fair Value		Amortized<br>Cost		Estimated<br>Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	15,760	$	15,415	$	1,180	$	1,181
Due after one year through five years		381,512		348,845		28,679		28,314
Due after five years through ten years		6,339		6,110		—		—
Due after ten years		4,654		4,408		—		—
		408,265		374,778		29,859		29,495
Mortgage-backed securities		1,699,344		1,497,105		1,428,806		1,336,882
Total	$	2,107,609	$	1,871,883	$	1,458,665	$	1,366,377

Note 3 – LHFI and ACL, LHFI

At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, LHFI consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	649,336	$	690,616
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		592,289		590,790
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		3,471,728		3,278,830
Other real estate secured		954,410		742,538
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		1,073,321		1,028,926
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		2,261,893		2,185,057
Commercial and industrial loans		1,883,480		1,821,259
Consumer loans		167,540		170,230
State and other political subdivision loans		1,111,710		1,223,863
Other commercial loans		448,260		471,930
LHFI		12,613,967		12,204,039
Less ACL		129,298		120,214
Net LHFI	$	12,484,669	$	12,083,825

12

---

Accrued interest receivable is not included in the amortized cost basis of Trustmark’s LHFI. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, accrued interest receivable for LHFI totaled $62.7 million and $50.7 million, respectively, with no related ACL and was reported in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

Loan Concentrations

Trustmark does not have any loan concentrations other than those reflected in the preceding table, which exceed 10% of total LHFI. At June 30, 2023, Trustmark’s geographic loan distribution was concentrated primarily in its five key market regions: Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of these loans is susceptible to changes in market conditions in these areas.

Nonaccrual and Past Due LHFI

No material interest income was recognized in the income statement on nonaccrual LHFI for each of the periods ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.

The following tables provide the amortized cost basis of loans on nonaccrual status and loans past due 90 days or more still accruing interest at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023
	Nonaccrual With No ACL		Total Nonaccrual		Loans Past Due 90 Days or More Still Accruing
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	108	$	2,596	$	—
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		2,115		5,557		661
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		4,084		7,232		—
Other real estate secured		—		216		—
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		—		7,620		—
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		—		26,587		2,907
Commercial and industrial loans		12,875		23,686		84
Consumer loans		—		232		231
Other commercial loans		—		1,301		28
Total	$	19,182	$	75,027	$	3,911
	December 31, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Nonaccrual With No ACL		Total Nonaccrual		Loans Past Due 90 Days or More Still Accruing
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	137	$	1,902	$	—
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		482		3,957		534
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		4,841		6,957		—
Other real estate secured		—		231		—
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		—		7,620		—
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		1,193		19,775		3,118
Commercial and industrial loans		14,441		25,102		—
Consumer loans		—		181		277
Other commercial loans		—		247		—
Total	$	21,094	$	65,972	$	3,929

13

---

The following tables provide an aging analysis of the amortized cost basis of past due LHFI (including nonaccrual LHFI) at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023
	Past Due
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days<br>or More		Total Past Due		Current<br>Loans		Total LHFI
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and<br>   other land	$	1,665	$	166	$	1,484	$	3,315	$	646,021	$	649,336
Other secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		4,190		1,145		1,817		7,152		585,137		592,289
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential<br>   properties		1,073		1,021		1,435		3,529		3,468,199		3,471,728
Other real estate secured		—		119		—		119		954,291		954,410
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		—		—		7,620		7,620		1,065,701		1,073,321
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		11,627		7,058		11,314		29,999		2,231,894		2,261,893
Commercial and industrial loans		1,505		1,529		420		3,454		1,880,026		1,883,480
Consumer loans		1,952		457		281		2,690		164,850		167,540
State and other political subdivision loans		77		—		—		77		1,111,633		1,111,710
Other commercial loans		480		124		—		604		447,656		448,260
Total	$	22,569	$	11,619	$	24,371	$	58,559	$	12,555,408	$	12,613,967
	December 31, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Past Due
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days<br>or More		Total Past Due		Current<br>Loans		Total LHFI
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and<br>   other land	$	1,972	$	199	$	34	$	2,205	$	688,411	$	690,616
Other secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		3,682		1,206		1,281		6,169		584,621		590,790
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential<br>   properties		825		18		794		1,637		3,277,193		3,278,830
Other real estate secured		131		30		—		161		742,377		742,538
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		—		—		7,620		7,620		1,021,306		1,028,926
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		10,709		4,236		9,999		24,944		2,160,113		2,185,057
Commercial and industrial loans		1,966		508		8,974		11,448		1,809,811		1,821,259
Consumer loans		2,199		645		279		3,123		167,107		170,230
State and other political subdivision loans		431		—		—		431		1,223,432		1,223,863
Other commercial loans		785		45		24		854		471,076		471,930
Total	$	22,700	$	6,887	$	29,005	$	58,592	$	12,145,447	$	12,204,039

Modified LHFI

Occasionally, Trustmark modifies loans for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties by providing payment concessions, interest-only payments for an extended period of time, maturity extensions or interest rate reductions. Other concessions may arise from court proceedings or may be imposed by law. In some cases, Trustmark provides multiple types of concessions on one loan.

14

---

The following tables present the amortized cost of LHFI at the end of each of the periods presented of loans modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty disaggregated by class of loan and type of modification ($ in thousands). The percentage of the amortized cost basis of LHFI that were modified to borrowers in financial distress as compared to the amortized cost basis of each class of LHFI is also presented below:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Payment Concession		Term Extension		Total		% of Total Class of Loan
Loans secured by real estate:
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties	$	—	$	401	$	401		0.07	%
Other loans secured by real estate:
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		—		276		276		0.01	%
Commercial and industrial loans		255		—		255		0.01	%
Consumer loans		—		42		42		0.03	%
Other commercial loans		117		31		148		0.03	%
Total	$	372	$	750	$	1,122		0.01	%
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Payment Concession		Term Extension		Total		% of Total Class of Loan
Loans secured by real estate:
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties	$	—	$	401	$	401		0.07	%
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		—		384		384		0.01	%
Other loans secured by real estate:
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		—		768		768		0.03	%
Commercial and industrial loans		255		—		255		0.01	%
Consumer loans		—		42		42		0.03	%
Other commercial loans		117		31		148		0.03	%
Total	$	372	$	1,626	$	1,998		0.02	%

The following tables detail the financial effect of the loan modifications presented above to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Financial Effect
	Payment Concessions	Term Extension
Loans secured by real estate:
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		Modified lines of credit to amortize over a twenty-four month term
Other loans secured by real estate:
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		Extended amortization with term adjusted by weighted-average 2.3 years
Commercial and industrial loans	Six month payment deferrals
Consumer loans		Bankruptcies extended amortization with term adjusted by weighted average 1.3 years reducing borrower payment
Other commercial loans	Six month payment deferrals	One loan renewed and extended maturity by seven months

15

---

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Financial Effect
	Payment Concessions	Term Extension
Loans secured by real estate:
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		Modified lines of credit to amortize over a twenty-four month term
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		One loan renewed and extended maturity by six months
Other loans secured by real estate:
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		Extended amortization with term adjusted by weighted-average 1.8 years
Commercial and industrial loans	Six month payment deferrals
Consumer loans		Bankruptcies extended amortization with term adjusted by weighted average 1.3 years reducing borrower payment
Other commercial loans	Six month payment deferral	One loan renewed and extended maturity by seven months

Trustmark had no unused commitments on modified loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty at June 30, 2023.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, Trustmark had term extension balances of $52 thousand and $108 thousand, respectively, at default for LHFI in the loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties portfolio that had a payment default and were modified within the twelve months prior to that default to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.

Trustmark has utilized loans 90 days or more past due to define payment default in determining modified loans that have subsequently defaulted. If Trustmark determines that a modified loan (or a portion of a loan) has subsequently been deemed uncollectible, the loan (or a portion of the loan) is charged off against the ACL, LHFI.

Trustmark closely monitors the performance of loans that are modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty to understand the effectiveness of its modification efforts. The following tables provide details of the performance of such LHFI that have been modified during the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Past Due
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days<br>or More		Total Past Due		Current<br>Loans		Total
Loans secured by real estate:
Other secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties	$	38	$	19	$	—	$	57	$	344	$	401
Other loans secured by real estate:
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		—		—		—		—		276		276
Commercial and industrial loans		—		—		—		—		255		255
Consumer loans		22		—		—		22		20		42
Other commercial loans		—		—		—		—		148		148
Total	$	60	$	19	$	—	$	79	$	1,043	$	1,122

16

---

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Past Due
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days<br>or More		Total Past Due		Current<br>Loans		Total
Loans secured by real estate:
Other secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties	$	38	$	19	$	—	$	57	$	344	$	401
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential<br>   properties		—		—		—		—		384		384
Other loans secured by real estate:
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		—		—		—		—		768		768
Commercial and industrial loans		—		—		—		—		255		255
Consumer loans		22		—		—		22		20		42
Other commercial loans		—		—		—		—		148		148
Total	$	60	$	19	$	—	$	79	$	1,919	$	1,998

Collateral-Dependent Loans

The following tables present the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by class of loans and collateral type as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023
	Real Estate		Vehicles		Miscellaneous		Total
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and<br>   other land	$	1,529	$	—	$	—	$	1,529
Other secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties		459		—		—		459
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential<br>   properties		4,084		—		—		4,084
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		7,620		—		—		7,620
Secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		1,656		—		—		1,656
Commercial and industrial loans		39		7		21,600		21,646
Other commercial loans		—		—		968		968
Total	$	15,387	$	7	$	22,568	$	37,962
	December 31, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Real Estate		Inventory and Receivables		Vehicles		Miscellaneous		Total
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and<br>   other land	$	1,558	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,558
Other secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties		482		—		—		—		482
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential<br>   properties		4,841		—		—		—		4,841
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		7,620		—		—		—		7,620
Secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		1,193		—		—		—		1,193
Commercial and industrial loans		40		233		395		23,926		24,594
Total	$	15,734	$	233	$	395	$	23,926	$	40,288

17

---

A loan is collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral. The following provides a qualitative description by class of loan of the collateral that secures Trustmark’s collateral-dependent LHFI:

• Loans secured by real estate – Loans within these loan classes are secured by liens on real estate properties. There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

• Other loans secured by real estate – Loans within these loan classes are secured by liens on real estate properties. There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

• Commercial and industrial loans – Loans within this loan class are primarily secured by inventory, accounts receivables, equipment and other non-real estate collateral. There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

• State and other political subdivision loans – Loans within this loan class are secured by liens on real estate properties or other non-real estate collateral. There have been no significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

• Other commercial loans – Loans within this loan class are secured by non-real estate collateral. One loan relationship experienced a decline in fair value to the collateral that secures the relationship due to general deterioration during the quarter. There have been no other significant changes to the collateral that secures these financial assets during the period.

Credit Quality Indicators

Trustmark’s LHFI portfolio credit quality indicators focus on six key quality ratios that are compared against bank tolerances. The loan indicators are total classified outstanding, total criticized outstanding, nonperforming loans, nonperforming assets, delinquencies and net loan losses. Due to the homogenous nature of consumer loans, Trustmark does not assign a formal internal risk rating to each credit and therefore the criticized and classified measures are primarily composed of commercial loans.

In addition to monitoring portfolio credit quality indicators, Trustmark also measures how effectively the lending process is being managed and risks are being identified. As part of an ongoing monitoring process, Trustmark grades the commercial portfolio segment as it relates to credit file completion and financial statement exceptions, underwriting, collateral documentation and compliance with law as shown below:

• Credit File Completeness and Financial Statement Exceptions – evaluates the quality and condition of credit files in terms of content and completeness and focuses on efforts to obtain and document sufficient information to determine the quality and status of credits. Also included is an evaluation of the systems/procedures used to ensure compliance with policy.

• Underwriting – evaluates whether credits are adequately analyzed, appropriately structured and properly approved within loan policy requirements. A properly approved credit is approved by an adequate authority in a timely manner with all conditions of approval fulfilled. Total policy exceptions measure the level of underwriting and other policy exceptions within a portfolio segment.

• Collateral Documentation – focuses on the adequacy of documentation to perfect Trustmark’s collateral position and substantiate collateral value. Collateral exceptions measure the level of documentation exceptions within a portfolio segment. Collateral exceptions occur when certain collateral documentation is either not present or not current.

• Compliance with Law – focuses on underwriting, documentation, approval and reporting in compliance with banking laws and regulations. Primary emphasis is directed to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Regulation O requirements and regulations governing appraisals.

18

---

Commercial Credits

Trustmark has established a loan grading system that consists of ten individual credit risk grades (risk ratings) that encompass a range from loans where the expectation of loss is negligible to loans where loss has been established. The model is based on the risk of default for an individual credit and establishes certain criteria to delineate the level of risk across the ten unique credit risk grades. Credit risk grade definitions are as follows:

• Risk Rate (RR) 1 through RR 6 – Grades one through six represent groups of loans that are not subject to criticism as defined in regulatory guidance. Loans in these groups exhibit characteristics that represent low to moderate risk measured by using a variety of credit risk criteria such as cash flow coverage, debt service coverage, balance sheet leverage, liquidity, management experience, industry position, prevailing economic conditions, support from secondary sources of repayment and other credit factors that may be relevant to a specific loan. In general, these loans are supported by properly margined collateral and guarantees of principal parties.

• Other Assets Especially Mentioned (Special Mention) (RR 7) – a loan that has a potential weakness that if not corrected will lead to a more severe rating. This rating is for credits that are currently protected but potentially weak because of an adverse feature or condition that if not corrected will lead to a further downgrade.

• Substandard (RR 8) – a loan that has at least one identified weakness that is well defined. This rating is for credits where the primary sources of repayment are not viable at the time of evaluation or where either the capital or collateral is not adequate to support the loan and the secondary means of repayment do not provide a sufficient level of support to offset the identified weakness. Loss potential exists in the aggregate amount of substandard loans but does not necessarily exist in individual loans.

• Doubtful (RR 9) – a loan with an identified weakness that does not have a valid secondary source of repayment. Generally, these credits have an impaired primary source of repayment and secondary sources are not sufficient to prevent a loss in the credit. The exact amount of the loss has not been determined at this time.

• Loss (RR 10) – a loan or a portion of a loan that is deemed to be uncollectible.

By definition, credit risk grades special mention (RR 7), substandard (RR 8), doubtful (RR 9) and loss (RR 10) are criticized loans while substandard (RR 8), doubtful (RR 9) and loss (RR 10) are classified loans. These definitions are standardized by the bank regulatory agencies and are generally equally applied to each individual lending institution. The remaining credit risk grades are considered pass credits and are solely defined by Trustmark.

To enhance this process, Trustmark has determined that certain loans will be individually assessed, and a formal analysis will be performed and based upon the analysis the loan will be written down to the net realizable value. Trustmark will individually assess and remove loans from the pool in the following circumstances:

• Commercial nonaccrual loans with total exposure of $500 thousand (excluding those portions of the debt that are government guaranteed or are secured by Trustmark deposits or marketable securities) or more.

• Any loan that is believed to not share similar risk characteristics with the rest of the pool will be individually assessed. Otherwise, the loan will be left within the pool based on the results of the assessment.

• Commercial accruing loans deemed to be a modified loan to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty with total exposure of $500 thousand (excluding those portions of the debt that are government guaranteed or are secured by Trustmark deposits or marketable securities) or more. If the loan is believed to not share similar risk characteristics with the rest of the loan pool, the loan will be individually assessed. Otherwise, the loan will be left within the pool and monitored on an ongoing basis.

Each loan officer assesses the appropriateness of the internal risk rating assigned to their credits on an ongoing basis. Trustmark’s Asset Review area conducts independent credit quality reviews of the majority of Trustmark’s commercial loan portfolio both on the underlying credit quality of each individual loan class as well as the adherence to Trustmark’s loan policy and the loan administration process.

In addition to the ongoing internal risk rate monitoring described above, Trustmark’s Credit Quality Review Committee meets monthly and performs a review of all loans of $100 thousand or more that are either delinquent 30 days or more or on nonaccrual. This review includes recommendations regarding risk ratings, accrual status, charge-offs and appropriate servicing officer as well as evaluation of problem credits for determination of modified status. Quarterly, the Credit Quality Review Committee reviews and modifies continuous action plans for all credits risk rated seven or worse for relationships of $100 thousand or more.

In addition, periodic reviews of significant development, commercial construction, multi-family and nonowner-occupied projects are performed. These reviews assess each particular project with respect to location, project valuations, progress of completion, leasing

19

---

status, current financial information, rents, operating expenses, cash flow, adherence to budget and projections and other information as applicable. Summary results are reviewed by Senior and Regional Credit Officers in addition to the Chief Credit Officer with a determination made as to the appropriateness of existing risk ratings and accrual status.

Consumer Credits

Consumer LHFI that do not meet a minimum custom credit score are reviewed quarterly. The Retail Credit Review Committee, Management Credit Policy Committee and the Enterprise Risk Committee review the volume and/or percentage of approvals that did not meet the minimum passing custom score to ensure that Trustmark continues to originate quality loans.

Trustmark monitors the levels and severity of past due consumer LHFI on a daily basis through its collection activities. A detailed assessment of consumer LHFI delinquencies is performed monthly at both a product and market level.

The tables below present the amortized cost basis of loans by credit quality indicator and class of loans based on analyses performed at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	Term Loans by Origination Year
	2023		2022		2021		2020		2019		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
As of June 30, 2023	Commercial LHFI
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land<br>   development and other<br>   land:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	185,143	$	198,373	$	82,919	$	17,158	$	2,509	$	2,515	$	49,243	$	537,860
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard - RR 8		2,562		1,518		—		—		1,407		—		—		5,487
Doubtful - RR 9		—		—		—		—		—		42		—		42
Total		187,705		199,891		82,919		17,158		3,916		2,557		49,243		543,389
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		4		10		—		—		—		—		14
Other secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	15,738	$	35,621	$	29,327	$	15,267	$	8,544	$	6,083	$	11,087	$	121,667
Special Mention - RR 7		—		29		56		13		—		—		—		98
Substandard - RR 8		340		697		265		66		84		293		102		1,847
Doubtful - RR 9		—		11		—		—		—		—		—		11
Total		16,078		36,358		29,648		15,346		8,628		6,376		11,189		123,623
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Secured by nonfarm,<br>   nonresidential properties:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	349,289	$	858,477	$	590,261	$	654,335	$	392,782	$	429,312	$	129,449	$	3,403,905
Special Mention - RR 7		9,911		—		20,000		—		—		—		—		29,911
Substandard - RR 8		13,768		1,945		1,867		450		8,758		10,941		64		37,793
Doubtful - RR 9		28		—		—		—		66		15		—		109
Total		372,996		860,422		612,128		654,785		401,606		440,268		129,513		3,471,718
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		39		—		—		19		28		—		86
Other real estate secured:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	50,962	$	290,528	$	240,639	$	252,239	$	93,669	$	13,258	$	11,937	$	953,232
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard - RR 8		—		136		397		299		—		55		95		982
Doubtful - RR 9		42		—		—		—		—		—		—		42
Total		51,004		290,664		241,036		252,538		93,669		13,313		12,032		954,256
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

20

---

	Term Loans by Origination Year
	2023		2022		2021		2020		2019		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
As of June 30, 2023	Commercial LHFI
Other loans secured by real<br>   estate:
Other construction:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	138,651	$	463,243	$	329,585	$	134,222	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,065,701
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard - RR 8		—		—		7,620		—		—		—		—		7,620
Doubtful - RR 9		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		138,651		463,243		337,205		134,222		—		—		—		1,073,321
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial<br>   loans:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	334,199	$	667,426	$	205,046	$	78,509	$	38,067	$	51,223	$	458,411	$	1,832,881
Special Mention - RR 7		—		8		206		10,227		22		—		6,177		16,640
Substandard - RR 8		5,026		1,827		8,928		1,470		132		36		16,278		33,697
Doubtful - RR 9		51		96		81		2		—		30		2		262
Total		339,276		669,357		214,261		90,208		38,221		51,289		480,868		1,883,480
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		309		393		128		62		28		7		927
State and other political<br>   subdivision loans:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	41,285	$	310,209	$	194,376	$	113,400	$	37,116	$	407,691	$	7,633	$	1,111,710
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard - RR 8		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Doubtful - RR 9		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		41,285		310,209		194,376		113,400		37,116		407,691		7,633		1,111,710
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other commercial loans:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	93,323	$	41,548	$	30,223	$	24,316	$	33,989	$	20,435	$	189,650	$	433,484
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard - RR 8		46		3,403		54		—		—		1,072		10,109		14,684
Doubtful - RR 9		92		—		—		—		—		—		—		92
Total		93,461		44,951		30,277		24,316		33,989		21,507		199,759		448,260
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		—		—		23		—		—		—		23
Total commercial<br>   LHFI	$	1,240,456	$	2,875,095	$	1,741,850	$	1,301,973	$	617,145	$	943,001	$	890,237	$	9,609,757
Total commercial LHFI<br>   gross charge-offs	$	—	$	352	$	403	$	151	$	81	$	56	$	7	$	1,050

21

---

	Term Loans by Origination Year
	2023		2022		2021		2020		2019		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
As of June 30, 2023	Consumer LHFI
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land<br>   development and other<br>   land:
Current	$	18,241	$	65,224	$	15,710	$	2,016	$	1,407	$	2,381	$	—	$	104,979
Past due 30-89 days		—		350		167		313		29		14		—		873
Past due 90 days or more		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Nonaccrual		—		—		54		—		35		6		—		95
Total		18,241		65,574		15,931		2,329		1,471		2,401		—		105,947
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties:
Current	$	13,826	$	17,954	$	6,149	$	4,842	$	4,652	$	9,691	$	401,955	$	459,069
Past due 30-89 days		—		330		74		11		42		734		2,832		4,023
Past due 90 days or more		—		6		—		—		—		90		565		661
Nonaccrual		60		155		61		3		16		1,110		3,508		4,913
Total		13,886		18,445		6,284		4,856		4,710		11,625		408,860		468,666
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		77		5		—		10		6		22		120
Secured by nonfarm,<br>   nonresidential properties:
Current	$	—	$	—	$	10	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	10
Past due 30-89 days		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Past due 90 days or more		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Nonaccrual		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		—		—		10		—		—		—		—		10
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other real estate secured:
Current	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	83	$	—	$	71	$	—	$	154
Past due 30-89 days		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Past due 90 days or more		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Nonaccrual		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		—		—		—		83		—		71		—		154
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

22

---

	Term Loans by Origination Year
	2023		2022		2021		2020		2019		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
As of June 30, 2023	Consumer LHFI
Other loans secured by real<br>   estate:
Secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties
Current	$	182,734	$	900,728	$	541,023	$	189,548	$	103,398	$	299,384	$	—	$	2,216,815
Past due 30-89 days		—		7,295		4,588		2,127		271		1,305		—		15,586
Past due 90 days or more		—		1,424		896		163		126		296		—		2,905
Nonaccrual		—		4,981		7,058		3,916		1,720		8,912		—		26,587
Total		182,734		914,428		553,565		195,754		105,515		309,897		—		2,261,893
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		—		268		25		83		—		79		—		455
Consumer loans:
Current	$	37,331	$	47,230	$	17,702	$	4,912	$	1,612	$	758	$	55,139	$	164,684
Past due 30-89 days		578		494		84		40		24		13		1,131		2,364
Past due 90 days or more		22		17		5		3		—		—		212		259
Nonaccrual		—		128		49		18		—		—		38		233
Total		37,931		47,869		17,840		4,973		1,636		771		56,520		167,540
Current period gross<br>   charge-offs		2,771		301		117		34		1		1		919		4,144
Total consumer LHFI	$	252,792	$	1,046,316	$	593,630	$	207,995	$	113,332	$	324,765	$	465,380	$	3,004,210
Total consumer LHFI<br>   gross charge-offs	$	2,771	$	646	$	147	$	117	$	11	$	86	$	941	$	4,719
Total LHFI	$	1,493,248	$	3,921,411	$	2,335,480	$	1,509,968	$	730,477	$	1,267,766	$	1,355,617	$	12,613,967
Total current period<br>   gross charge-offs	$	2,771	$	998	$	550	$	268	$	92	$	142	$	948	$	5,769
	Term Loans by Origination Year
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	2022		2021		2020		2019		2018		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
As of December 31, 2022	Commercial LHFI
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land<br>   development and other<br>   land:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	363,824	$	119,727	$	29,632	$	3,405	$	1,016	$	2,364	$	64,953	$	584,921
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard - RR 8		146		199		—		1,415		—		—		44		1,804
Doubtful - RR 9		—		—		—		—		—		42		—		42
Total		363,970		119,926		29,632		4,820		1,016		2,406		64,997		586,767
Other secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	41,996	$	33,346	$	17,215	$	9,341	$	6,798	$	2,870	$	12,209	$	123,775
Special Mention - RR 7		29		64		17		—		—		—		—		110
Substandard - RR 8		686		31		75		88		220		285		—		1,385
Doubtful - RR 9		15		—		—		—		—		—		—		15
Total		42,726		33,441		17,307		9,429		7,018		3,155		12,209		125,285
Secured by nonfarm,<br>   nonresidential properties:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	889,556	$	657,242	$	603,515	$	457,163	$	205,425	$	281,828	$	130,052	$	3,224,781
Special Mention - RR 7		10,284		—		—		271		—		—		—		10,555
Substandard - RR 8		12,034		1,066		9,457		905		706		18,488		693		43,349
Doubtful - RR 9		34		—		—		77		—		18		—		129
Total		911,908		658,308		612,972		458,416		206,131		300,334		130,745		3,278,814
Other real estate secured:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	293,051	$	156,386	$	143,114	$	107,827	$	11,297	$	17,626	$	12,516	$	741,817
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard - RR 8		30		—		309		—		5		68		126		538
Doubtful - RR 9		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		293,081		156,386		143,423		107,827		11,302		17,694		12,642		742,355

23

---

	Term Loans by Origination Year
	2022		2021		2020		2019		2018		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
As of December 31, 2022	Commercial LHFI
Other loans secured by real<br>   estate:
Other construction
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	372,981	$	306,904	$	340,388	$	833	$	—	$	—	$	200	$	1,021,306
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard - RR 8		—		7,620		—		—		—		—		—		7,620
Doubtful - RR 9		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		372,981		314,524		340,388		833		—		—		200		1,028,926
Commercial and industrial<br>   loans:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	673,848	$	261,962	$	120,123	$	44,994	$	14,265	$	69,078	$	577,749	$	1,762,019
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		12,421		—		—		—		6,454		18,875
Substandard - RR 8		6,973		9,845		2,170		312		74		—		20,625		39,999
Doubtful - RR 9		240		53		10		4		35		—		24		366
Total		681,061		271,860		134,724		45,310		14,374		69,078		604,852		1,821,259
State and other political<br>   subdivision loans:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	393,345	$	223,302	$	123,350	$	39,031	$	18,876	$	421,588	$	1,671	$	1,221,163
Special Mention - RR 7		—		—		—		—		—		2,700		—		2,700
Substandard - RR 8		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Doubtful - RR 9		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		393,345		223,302		123,350		39,031		18,876		424,288		1,671		1,223,863
Other commercial loans:
Pass - RR 1 through RR 6	$	88,763	$	40,006	$	28,239	$	37,607	$	6,424	$	10,829	$	244,882	$	456,750
Special Mention - RR 7		879		—		—		—		—		—		—		879
Substandard - RR 8		3,728		98		—		—		16		1,134		9,301		14,277
Doubtful - RR 9		24		—		—		—		—		—		—		24
Total		93,394		40,104		28,239		37,607		6,440		11,963		254,183		471,930
Total commercial<br>   LHFI	$	3,152,466	$	1,817,851	$	1,430,035	$	703,273	$	265,157	$	828,918	$	1,081,499	$	9,279,199

24

---

	Term Loans by Origination Year
	2022		2021		2020		2019		2018		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
As of December 31, 2022	Consumer LHFI
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land<br>   development and other<br>   land:
Current	$	62,049	$	32,867	$	3,304	$	1,759	$	1,679	$	1,915	$	—	$	103,573
Past due 30-89 days		—		150		—		36		15		9		—		210
Past due 90 days or more		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Nonaccrual		—		58		—		—		—		8		—		66
Total		62,049		33,075		3,304		1,795		1,694		1,932		—		103,849
Other secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties:
Current	$	25,402	$	7,983	$	5,389	$	4,894	$	3,701	$	7,252	$	403,123	$	457,744
Past due 30-89 days		19		35		15		134		5		286		3,197		3,691
Past due 90 days or more		—		—		—		1		—		—		452		453
Nonaccrual		88		24		4		20		7		454		3,020		3,617
Total		25,509		8,042		5,408		5,049		3,713		7,992		409,792		465,505
Secured by nonfarm,<br>   nonresidential properties:
Current	$	—	$	16	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	16
Past due 30-89 days		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Past due 90 days or more		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Nonaccrual		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		—		16		—		—		—		—		—		16
Other real estate secured:
Current	$	—	$	—	$	89	$	—	$	5	$	89	$	—	$	183
Past due 30-89 days		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Past due 90 days or more		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Nonaccrual		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total		—		—		89		—		5		89		—		183
Other loans secured by real<br>   estate:
Secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties
Current	$	939,511	$	559,804	$	198,769	$	109,466	$	80,249	$	262,196	$	—	$	2,149,995
Past due 30-89 days		3,967		3,752		2,119		425		—		1,906		—		12,169
Past due 90 days or more		835		777		272		—		134		1,100		—		3,118
Nonaccrual		2,363		4,180		3,275		1,896		2,028		6,033		—		19,775
Total		946,676		568,513		204,435		111,787		82,411		271,235		—		2,185,057
Consumer loans:
Current	$	70,858	$	25,771	$	9,514	$	2,509	$	1,513	$	295	$	56,508	$	166,968
Past due 30-89 days		1,431		238		159		8		23		10		946		2,815
Past due 90 days or more		28		12		7		1		2		—		216		266
Nonaccrual		79		41		19		17		4		—		21		181
Total		72,396		26,062		9,699		2,535		1,542		305		57,691		170,230
Total consumer LHFI	$	1,106,630	$	635,708	$	222,935	$	121,166	$	89,365	$	281,553	$	467,483	$	2,924,840
Total LHFI	$	4,259,096	$	2,453,559	$	1,652,970	$	824,439	$	354,522	$	1,110,471	$	1,548,982	$	12,204,039

25

---

Past Due LHFS

LHFS past due 90 days or more totaled $35.8 million and $49.3 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. LHFS past due 90 days or more are serviced loans eligible for repurchase, which are fully guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). GNMA optional repurchase programs allow financial institutions to buy back individual delinquent mortgage loans that meet certain criteria from the securitized loan pool for which the institution provides servicing. At the servicer’s option and without GNMA’s prior authorization, the servicer may repurchase such a delinquent loan for an amount equal to 100% of the remaining principal balance of the loan. This buy-back option is considered a conditional option until the delinquency criteria are met, at which time the option becomes unconditional. When Trustmark is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans under the unconditional buy-back option, the loans can no longer be reported as sold and must be brought back onto the balance sheet as loans held for sale, regardless of whether Trustmark intends to exercise the buy-back option. These loans are reported as held for sale with the offsetting liability being reported as short-term borrowings.

Trustmark did not exercise its buy-back option on any delinquent loans serviced for GNMA during the first six months of 2023 or 2022.

ACL on LHFI

Trustmark’s ACL methodology for LHFI is based upon guidance within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 326-20 as well as applicable regulatory guidance. The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Credit quality within the LHFI portfolio is continuously monitored by Management and is reflected within the ACL for LHFI. The ACL is an estimate of expected losses inherent within Trustmark’s existing LHFI portfolio. The ACL for LHFI is adjusted through the PCL, LHFI and reduced by the charge off of loan amounts, net of recoveries.

The methodology for estimating the amount of expected credit losses reported in the ACL has two basic components: a collective, or pooled, component for estimated expected credit losses for pools of loans that share similar risk characteristics, and an asset-specific component involving individual loans that do not share risk characteristics with other loans and the measurement of expected credit losses for such individual loans. In estimating the ACL for the collective component, loans are segregated into loan pools based on loan product types and similar risk characteristics.

The loans secured by real estate and other loans secured by real estate portfolio segments include loans for both commercial and residential properties. The underwriting process for these loans includes analysis of the financial position and strength of both the borrower and guarantor, experience with similar projects in the past, market demand and prospects for successful completion of the proposed project within the established budget and schedule, values of underlying collateral, availability of permanent financing, maximum loan-to-value ratios, minimum equity requirements, acceptable amortization periods and minimum debt service coverage requirements, based on property type. The borrower’s financial strength and capacity to repay their obligations remain the primary focus of underwriting. Financial strength is evaluated based upon analytical tools that consider historical and projected cash flows and performance in addition to analysis of the proposed project for income-producing properties. Additional support offered by guarantors is also considered. Ultimate repayment of these loans is sensitive to interest rate changes, general economic conditions, liquidity and availability of long-term financing.

The commercial and industrial LHFI portfolio segment includes loans within Trustmark’s geographic markets made to many types of businesses for various purposes, such as short-term working capital loans that are usually secured by accounts receivable and inventory and term financing for equipment and fixed asset purchases that are secured by those assets. Trustmark’s credit underwriting process for commercial and industrial loans includes analysis of historical and projected cash flows and performance, evaluation of financial strength of both borrowers and guarantors as reflected in current and detailed financial information and evaluation of underlying collateral to support the credit.

The consumer LHFI portfolio segment is comprised of loans that are centrally underwritten based on a credit scoring system as well as an evaluation of the borrower’s repayment capacity, credit, and collateral. Property appraisals are obtained to assist in evaluating collateral. Loan-to-value and debt-to-income ratios, loan amount, and lien position are also considered in assessing whether to originate a loan. These borrowers are particularly susceptible to downturns in economic trends such as conditions that negatively affect housing prices and demand and levels of unemployment.

The state and other political subdivision LHFI and the other commercial LHFI portfolio segments primarily consist of loans to non-depository financial institutions, such as mortgage companies, finance companies and other financial intermediaries, loans to state and political subdivisions, and loans to non-profit and charitable organizations. These loans are underwritten based on the specific nature or purpose of the loan and underlying collateral with special consideration given to the specific source of repayment for the loan.

26

---

The following table provides a description of each of Trustmark’s portfolio segments, loan classes, loan pools and the ACL methodology and loss drivers:

Portfolio Segment	Loan Class	Loan Pool	Methodology	Loss Drivers
Loans secured by real estate	Construction, land<br>   development and other land	1-4 family residential<br>   construction	DCF	Prime Rate, National GDP
		Lots and development	DCF	Prime Rate, Southern Unemployment
		Unimproved land	DCF	Prime Rate, Southern Unemployment
		All other consumer	DCF	Southern Unemployment
	Other secured by 1-4<br>   family residential<br>   properties	Consumer 1-4 family - 1st liens	DCF	Prime Rate, Southern Unemployment
		All other consumer	DCF	Southern Unemployment
		Nonresidential owner-occupied	DCF	Southern Unemployment, National GDP
	Secured by nonfarm,<br>   nonresidential properties	Nonowner-occupied -<br>   hotel/motel	DCF	Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment
		Nonowner-occupied - office	DCF	Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment
		Nonowner-occupied- Retail	DCF	Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment
		Nonowner-occupied - senior<br>   living/nursing homes	DCF	Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment
		Nonowner-occupied -<br>   all other	DCF	Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment
		Nonresidential owner-occupied	DCF	Southern Unemployment, National GDP
	Other real estate secured	Nonresidential nonowner<br>   -occupied - apartments	DCF	Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment
		Nonresidential owner-occupied	DCF	Southern Unemployment, National GDP
		Nonowner-occupied -<br>   all other	DCF	Southern Vacancy Rate, Southern Unemployment
Other loans secured by<br>   real estate	Other construction	Other construction	DCF	Prime Rate, National Unemployment
	Secured by 1-4 family<br>   residential properties	Trustmark mortgage	WARM	Southern Unemployment
Commercial and<br>   industrial loans	Commercial and<br>   industrial loans	Commercial and industrial -<br>   non-working capital	DCF	Trustmark historical data
		Commercial and industrial -<br>   working capital	DCF	Trustmark historical data
		Equipment finance loans	WARM	Southern Unemployment, Southern GDP
		Credit cards	WARM	Trustmark call report data
		Equipment finance leases	WARM	Southern Unemployment, Southern GDP
Consumer loans	Consumer loans	Credit cards	WARM	Trustmark call report data
		Overdrafts	Loss Rate	Trustmark historical data
		All other consumer	DCF	Southern Unemployment
State and other political<br>   subdivision loans	State and other political<br>   subdivision loans	Obligations of state and<br>   political subdivisions	DCF	Moody's Bond Default Study
Other commercial loans	Other commercial loans	Other loans	DCF	Prime Rate, Southern Unemployment
		Commercial and industrial -<br>   non-working capital	DCF	Trustmark historical data
		Commercial and industrial -<br>   working capital	DCF	Trustmark historical data

In general, Trustmark utilizes a DCF method to estimate the quantitative portion of the ACL for loan pools. The DCF model consists of two key components, a loss driver analysis (LDA) and a cash flow analysis. For loan pools utilizing the DCF methodology, multiple assumptions are in place, depending on the loan pool. A reasonable and supportable forecast is utilized for each loan pool by developing a LDA for each loan class. The LDA uses charge off data from Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) reports to construct a periodic default rate (PDR). The PDR is decomposed into a PD. Regressions are run using the data for various

27

---

macroeconomic variables in order to determine which ones correlate to Trustmark’s losses. These variables are then incorporated into the application to calculate a quarterly PD using a third-party baseline forecast. In addition to the PD, a LGD is derived using a method referred to as Frye Jacobs. The Frye Jacobs method is a mathematical formula that traces the relationship between LGD and PD over time and projects the LGD based on the levels of PD forecasts. This model approach is applicable to all pools within the construction, land development and other land, other secured by 1-4 family residential properties, secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties and other real estate secured loan classes as well as consumer loans and other commercial loans.

During the first quarter of 2022, Management elected to incorporate a methodology change related to the other construction pool. Components of this change include management utilizing an alternative LDA to support the PD and LGD assumptions necessary to apply a DCF methodology to the other construction pool. Fundamentally, this approach utilizes publicly reported default balances and leverages a generalized linear model (GLM) framework to estimate PD. Taken together, these differences allow for results to be scaled to be specific and directly applicable to the other construction segment. LGD is assumed to be a through-the-cycle constant based on the actual performance of Trustmark’s other construction segment. These assumptions are then input into the DCF model and used in conjunction with prepayment data to calculate the cash flows at the individual loan level. Previously, the other construction pool used the weighted average remaining maturity (WARM) method. Management believes this change is commensurate with the level of risk in the pool.

For the commercial and industrial loans related pools, Trustmark uses its own PD and LGD data, instead of the macroeconomic variables and the Frye Jacobs method described above, to calculate the PD and LGD as there were no defensible macroeconomic variables that correlated to Trustmark’s losses. Trustmark utilizes a third-party Bond Default Study to derive the PD and LGD for the obligations of state and political subdivisions pool. Due to the lack of losses within this pool, no defensible macroeconomic factors were identified to correlate.

The PD and LGD measures are used in conjunction with prepayment data as inputs into the DCF model to calculate the cash flows at the individual loan level. Contractual cash flows based on loan terms are adjusted for PD, LGD and prepayments to derive loss cash flows. These loss cash flows are discounted by the loan’s coupon rate to arrive at the discounted cash flow based quantitative loss. The prepayment studies are updated quarterly by a third-party for each applicable pool.

An alternate method of estimating the ACL is used for certain loan pools due to specific characteristics of these loans. For the non-DCF pools, specifically, those using the WARM method, the remaining life is incorporated into the ACL quantitative calculation.

Trustmark determined that reasonable and supportable forecasts could be made for a twelve-month period for all of its loan pools. To the extent the lives of the loans in the LHFI portfolio extend beyond this forecast period, Trustmark uses a reversion period of four quarters and reverts to the historical mean on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the loans. The econometric models currently in production reflect segment or pool level sensitivities of PD to changes in macroeconomic variables. By measuring the relationship between defaults and changes in the economy, the quantitative reserve incorporates reasonable and supportable forecasts of future conditions that will affect the value of its assets, as required by FASB ASC Topic 326. Under stable forecasts, these linear regressions will reasonably predict a pool’s PD. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the macroeconomic variables used for reasonable and supportable forecasting changed rapidly. At the macroeconomic levels experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is not clear that the models currently in production will produce reasonably representative results since the models were originally estimated using data beginning in 2004 through 2019. During this period, a traditional, albeit severe, economic recession occurred. Thus, econometric models are sensitive to similar future levels of PD.

In order to prevent the econometric models from extrapolating beyond reasonable boundaries of their input variables, Trustmark chose to establish an upper and lower limit process when applying the periodic forecasts. In this way, Management will not rely upon unobserved and untested relationships in the setting of the quantitative reserve. This approach applies to all input variables, including: Southern Unemployment, National Unemployment, National Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Southern GDP, Southern Vacancy Rate and the Prime Rate. The upper and lower limits are based on the distribution of the macroeconomic variable by selecting extreme percentiles at the upper and lower limits of the distribution, the 1st and 99th percentiles, respectively. These upper and lower limits are then used to calculate the PD for the forecast time period in which the forecasted values are outside of the upper and lower limit range. Due to multiple periods having a PD or LGD at or near zero as a result of the improving macroeconomic forecasts, Management implemented PD and LGD floors to account for the risk associated with each portfolio. The PD and LGD floors are based on Trustmark’s historical loss experience and applied at a portfolio level.

Qualitative factors used in the ACL methodology include the following:

• Lending policies and procedures

• Economic conditions and concentrations of credit

28

---

• Nature and volume of the portfolio

• Performance trends

• External factors

While all these factors are incorporated into the overall methodology, only four are currently considered active: (i) economic conditions and concentrations of credit, (ii) nature and volume of the portfolio, (iii) performance trends and (iv) external factors.

Two of Trustmark’s largest loan classes are the loans secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties and the loans secured by other real estate. Trustmark elected to create a qualitative factor specifically for these loan classes which addresses changes in the economic conditions of metropolitan areas and applies additional pool level reserves. This qualitative factor is based on third-party market data and forecast trends and is updated quarterly as information is available, by market and by loan pool.

For the performance trends factor, Trustmark uses migration analyses to allocate additional ACL to non-pass/delinquent loans within each pool. In this way, Management believes the ACL will directly reflect changes in risk, based on the performance of the loans within a pool, whether declining or improving.

The nature and volume of the portfolio qualitative factor utilizes peer and industry assumptions for pools of loans where Trustmark’s historical experience might not capture the risk associated within a specific pool due to it being a different type of lending, different sources of repayment or a new line of business.

The external factors qualitative factor is Management’s best judgement on the loan or pool level impact of all factors that affect the portfolio that are not accounted for using any other part of the ACL methodology (e.g., natural disasters, changes in legislation, impacts due to technology and pandemics). Trustmark's External Factor – Pandemic ensures reserve adequacy for collectively evaluated loans most likely to be impacted by the unique economic and behavioral conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional qualitative reserves are derived based on two principles. The first is the disconnect of economic factors to Trustmark’s modeled PD (derived from the econometric models underpinning the quantitative pooled reserves). During the pandemic, extraordinary measures by the federal government were made available to consumers and businesses, including COVID-19 loan payment concessions, direct transfer payments to households, tax deferrals, and reduced interest rates, among others. These government interventions may have extended the lag between economic conditions and default, relative to what was captured in the model development data. Because Trustmark’s econometric PD models rely on the observed relationship from the economic downturn from 2007 to 2009 in both timing and severity, Management does not expect the models to reflect these current conditions. For example, while the models would predict contemporaneous unemployment peaks and loan defaults, this may not occur when borrowers can request payment deferrals. Thus, for the affected population, economic conditions are not fully considered as a part of Trustmark’s quantitative reserve. The second principle is the change in risk that is identified by rating changes. As a part of Trustmark’s credit review process, loans in the affected population have been given more frequent screening to ensure accurate ratings are maintained through this dynamic period. Trustmark’s quantitative reserve does not directly address changes in ratings, thus a migration qualitative factor was designed to work in concert with the quantitative reserve.

As discussed above, the disconnect of economic factors means that changes in rating caused by deteriorating and weak economic conditions as a result of the pandemic were not being captured in the quantitative reserve. During 2020, due to unforeseen pandemic conditions that varied from Management’s expectations, additional reserves were further dimensioned in order to appropriately reflect the risk within the portfolio related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In an effort to ensure the External Factor-Pandemic qualitative factor is reasonable and supportable, historical Trustmark loss data was leveraged to construct a framework that is quantitative in nature. To dimension the additional reserve, Management uses the sensitivity of the quantitative commercial loan reserve to changes in macroeconomic conditions to apply to loans rated acceptable or better (RR 1-4). In addition, to account for the known changes in risk, a weighted average of the commercial loan portfolio loss rate, derived from the performance trends qualitative factor, is used to dimension additional reserves for downgraded credits. Loans rated acceptable with risk (RR 5) or watch (RR 6) received the additional reserves based on the average of the macroeconomic conditions and weighted-average of the commercial loan portfolio loss rate while the loans rated special mention and substandard received additional reserves based on the weighted-average described above. During the fourth quarter of 2022, Management noted that all pass rated loans (RR 5 & RR 6) related to the External Factor-Pandemic qualitative factor either did not experience significant stress related to the pandemic or have since recovered and does not expect future stresses attributed to the pandemic that may affect these loans. As a result, Management decided to accelerate the release of the additional pandemic reserves on all pass rated loans.

29

---

During the first quarter of 2022, in order to account for the potential uncertainty related to higher prices and low economic growth, Trustmark chose to enact a portion of the qualitative framework, External Factor - Stagflation. Management calculated the reserve using a third-party stagflation forecast and compared it to the third-party baseline forecast used in the quantitative modeling. The weighted differential is added as qualitative reserves to account for potential uncertainty. During the fourth quarter of 2022, Management determined that the likelihood of a stagflation scenario had sufficiently diminished. Management identified that the potential had already been reduced and effectively captured within a nominally more negative baseline economic forecast. As a result, Management elected to resolve the External Factor - Stagflation and fully release the reserves.

The following tables disaggregate the ACL and the amortized cost basis of the loans by the measurement methodology used at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023
	ACL						LHFI
	Individually Evaluated for Credit Loss		Collectively Evaluated for Credit Loss		Total		Individually Evaluated for Credit Loss		Collectively Evaluated for Credit Loss		Total
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and<br>   other land	$	206	$	15,137	$	15,343	$	1,529		647,807	$	649,336
Other secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		—		12,173		12,173		459		591,830		592,289
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential<br>   properties		—		20,376		20,376		4,084		3,467,644		3,471,728
Other real estate secured		—		3,481		3,481		—		954,410		954,410
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		7,620		6,757		14,377		7,620		1,065,701		1,073,321
Secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		—		28,555		28,555		1,656		2,260,237		2,261,893
Commercial and industrial loans		8,770		14,400		23,170		21,646		1,861,834		1,883,480
Consumer loans		—		5,540		5,540		—		167,540		167,540
State and other political subdivision loans		—		676		676		—		1,111,710		1,111,710
Other commercial loans		968		4,639		5,607		968		447,292		448,260
Total	$	17,564	$	111,734	$	129,298	$	37,962	$	12,576,005	$	12,613,967
	December 31, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	ACL						LHFI
	Individually Evaluated for Credit Loss		Collectively Evaluated for Credit Loss		Total		Individually Evaluated for Credit Loss		Collectively Evaluated for Credit Loss		Total
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and<br>   other land	$	121	$	12,707	$	12,828	$	1,558	$	689,058	$	690,616
Other secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		—		12,374		12,374		482		590,308		590,790
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential<br>   properties		—		19,488		19,488		4,841		3,273,989		3,278,830
Other real estate secured		—		4,743		4,743		—		742,538		742,538
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		7,620		7,512		15,132		7,620		1,021,306		1,028,926
Secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		—		21,185		21,185		1,193		2,183,864		2,185,057
Commercial and industrial loans		9,946		13,194		23,140		24,594		1,796,665		1,821,259
Consumer loans		—		5,792		5,792		—		170,230		170,230
State and other political subdivision loans		—		885		885		—		1,223,863		1,223,863
Other commercial loans		—		4,647		4,647		—		471,930		471,930
Total	$	17,687	$	102,527	$	120,214	$	40,288	$	12,163,751	$	12,204,039

30

---

Changes in the ACL, LHFI were as follows for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Balance at beginning of period	$	122,239		$	98,734		$	120,214		$	99,457
Loans charged-off		(2,773	)		(2,277	)		(5,769	)		(4,519	)
Recoveries		1,621			3,967			3,398			6,346
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(1,152	)		1,690			(2,371	)		1,827
PCL, LHFI		8,211			2,716			11,455			1,856
Balance at end of period	$	129,298		$	103,140		$	129,298		$	103,140

The following tables detail changes in the ACL, LHFI by loan class for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charge-offs			Recoveries		PCL			Balance at <br>End of <br>Period
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	13,260	$	—		$	64	$	2,019		$	15,343
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		11,918		(86	)		75		266			12,173
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		18,640		(58	)		10		1,784			20,376
Other real estate secured		2,362		—			2		1,117			3,481
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		14,470		—			18		(111	)		14,377
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		26,156		(161	)		14		2,546			28,555
Commercial and industrial loans		23,462		(456	)		217		(53	)		23,170
Consumer loans		5,532		(1,989	)		1,221		776			5,540
State and other political subdivision loans		729		—			—		(53	)		676
Other commercial loans		5,710		(23	)		—		(80	)		5,607
Total	$	122,239	$	(2,773	)	$	1,621	$	8,211		$	129,298

The increases in the PCL, LHFI for the three months ended June 30, 2023 were primarily attributable to extended maturities on the secured by 1-4 family residential properties portfolio resulting from lower prepayment speeds, the weakening macroeconomic forecasts and loan growth.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charge-offs			Recoveries		PCL			Balance at <br>End of <br>Period
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	7,351	$	(6	)	$	344	$	(388	)	$	7,301
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		9,867		(49	)		206		14			10,038
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		32,030		—			1,474		(3,769	)		29,735
Other real estate secured		3,640		(131	)		4		(216	)		3,297
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		13,947		—			201		249			14,397
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		5,628		(79	)		4		6,697			12,250
Commercial and industrial loans		14,951		(90	)		203		(961	)		14,103
Consumer loans		4,872		(357	)		452		172			5,139
State and other political subdivision loans		2,371		—			—		(454	)		1,917
Other commercial loans		4,077		(1,565	)		1,079		1,372			4,963
Total	$	98,734	$	(2,277	)	$	3,967	$	2,716		$	103,140

The decreases in the PCL, LHFI for the three months ended June 30, 2022 were primarily due to improvements in credit quality and in the macroeconomic forecasting variables used in the ACL modeling, such as National and Southern Unemployment, National GDP, Prime Rate and Southern Vacancy Rate and the PD and LGD floors.

The PCL, LHFI for the secured by 1-4 family residential properties portfolio increased $6.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to loan growth and the nature and volume of the portfolio. For the three months ended June 30, 2022, the PCL, LHFI for the other commercial loan portfolio increased $1.4 million primarily due to an increase in balances within the portfolio.

31

---

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charge-offs			Recoveries		PCL			Balance at <br>End of <br>Period
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	12,828	$	(14	)	$	72	$	2,457		$	15,343
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		12,374		(120	)		122		(203	)		12,173
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		19,488		(86	)		106		868			20,376
Other real estate secured		4,743		—			5		(1,267	)		3,481
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		15,132		—			48		(803	)		14,377
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		21,185		(455	)		20		7,805			28,555
Commercial and industrial loans		23,140		(927	)		487		470			23,170
Consumer loans		5,792		(4,144	)		2,538		1,354			5,540
State and other political subdivision loans		885		—			—		(209	)		676
Other commercial loans		4,647		(23	)		—		983			5,607
Total	$	120,214	$	(5,769	)	$	3,398	$	11,455		$	129,298

The increases in the PCL, LHFI for the six months ended June 30, 2023 were primarily attributable to loan growth and the nature and volume of portfolio qualitative factor.

The PCL, LHFI for the other construction portfolio and the other real estate secured portfolio decreased $2.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2023 primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic forecast variables used in the ACL modeling, such as National and Southern Unemployment, National GDP, Prime Rate, and Southern Vacancy Rate and the PD and LGD floors.

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charge-offs			Recoveries		PCL			Balance at <br>End of <br>Period
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	6,079	$	(34	)	$	1,187	$	69		$	7,301
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		10,310		(62	)		295		(505	)		10,038
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		37,912		—			1,501		(9,678	)		29,735
Other real estate secured		4,713		(131	)		7		(1,292	)		3,297
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		5,968		—			204		8,225			14,397
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		2,706		(79	)		10		9,613			12,250
Commercial and industrial loans		18,939		(375	)		303		(4,764	)		14,103
Consumer loans		4,774		(936	)		831		470			5,139
State and other political subdivision loans		2,708		—			—		(791	)		1,917
Other commercial loans		5,348		(2,902	)		2,008		509			4,963
Total	$	99,457	$	(4,519	)	$	6,346	$	1,856		$	103,140

The decreases in the PCL, LHFI for the six months ended June 30, 2022 were primarily due to improvements in credit quality and in the macroeconomic forecasting variables used in the ACL modeling, such as National and Southern Unemployment, National GDP, Prime Rate and Southern Vacancy Rate and the PD and LGD floors.

For the six months ended June 30, 2022, the PCL, LHFI for the other construction loan portfolio increased $8.2 million primarily due to specific reserves on individually analyzed credits. The PCL, LHFI for the secured by 1-4 family residential properties portfolio increased $9.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2022 primarily due to loan growth and the nature and volume of the portfolio as well as a decrease in prepayment speeds which resulted from the rising interest-rate environment.

Note 4 – Mortgage Banking

MSR

The activity in the MSR is detailed in the table below for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022
Balance at beginning of period	$	129,677		$	87,687
Origination of servicing assets		6,602			10,159
Change in fair value:
Due to market changes		1,926			30,759
Due to run-off		(3,855	)		(7,591	)
Balance at end of period	$	134,350		$	121,014

Trustmark determines the fair value of the MSR using a valuation model administered by a third party that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. Trustmark considers the conditional prepayment rate (CPR), which is an estimated loan prepayment rate that uses historical prepayment rates for previous loans similar to the loans being evaluated, the float rate, which is the interest rate earned on escrow balances, and the discount rate as some of the primary assumptions used in determining the fair value of the MSR. An increase in either the CPR or discount rate assumption will result in a decrease in the fair value of the MSR, while a decrease in either assumption will result in an increase in the fair value of the MSR. An increase in the float rate will result in an increase in the fair value of the MSR, while a decrease in the float rate will result in a decrease in the fair value of the MSR. At June 30, 2023, the fair value of the MSR included an assumed average prepayment speed of 8 CPR and an average discount rate of 10.08% compared to an assumed average prepayment speed of 8 CPR and an average discount rate of 9.58% at June 30, 2022.

Mortgage Loans Serviced/Sold

During the first six months of 2023 and 2022, Trustmark sold $549.3 million and $711.1 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans. Gains on these sales were recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and totaled $7.7 million for the first six months of 2023 compared to $12.3 million for the first six months of 2022.

The table below details the mortgage loans sold and serviced for others at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Federal National Mortgage Association	$	4,743,637	$	4,684,815
Government National Mortgage Association		3,415,490		3,350,222
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		72,432		52,023
Other		28,535		28,764
Total mortgage loans sold and serviced for others	$	8,260,094	$	8,115,824

Trustmark is subject to losses in its loan servicing portfolio due to loan foreclosures. Trustmark has obligations to either repurchase the outstanding principal balance of a loan or make the purchaser whole for the economic benefits of a loan if it is determined that the loan sold was in violation of representations or warranties made by Trustmark at the time of the sale, herein referred to as mortgage loan servicing putback expenses. Such representations and warranties typically include those made regarding loans that had missing or insufficient file documentation, loans that do not meet investor guidelines, loans in which the appraisal does not support the value and/or loans obtained through fraud by the borrowers or other third parties. Generally, putback requests may be made until the loan is paid in full. However, mortgage loans delivered to Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) on or after January 1, 2013 are subject to the Representations and Warranties Framework, which provides certain instances in which FNMA and FHLMC will not exercise their remedies, including a putback request, for breaches of certain selling representations and warranties, such as payment history and quality control review.

When a putback request is received, Trustmark evaluates the request and takes appropriate actions based on the nature of the request. Trustmark is required by FNMA and FHLMC to provide a response to putback requests within 60 days of the date of receipt. The total mortgage loan servicing putback expenses are included in other expense. At both June 30, 2023 and 2022, Trustmark had a reserve for mortgage loan servicing putback expenses of $500 thousand.

33

---

There is inherent uncertainty in reasonably estimating the requirement for reserves against potential future mortgage loan servicing putback expenses. Future putback expenses are dependent on many subjective factors, including the review procedures of the purchasers and the potential refinance activity on loans sold with servicing released and the subsequent consequences under the representations and warranties. Trustmark believes that it has appropriately reserved for potential mortgage loan servicing putback requests.

Note 5 – Other Real Estate

At June 30, 2023, Trustmark’s geographic other real estate distribution was primarily concentrated in its Mississippi market region. The ultimate recovery of a substantial portion of the carrying amount of other real estate is susceptible to changes in market conditions in this area.

For the periods presented, changes and gains (losses), net on other real estate were as follows ($ in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,986		$	4,557
Additions		570			456
Disposals		(1,266	)		(1,868	)
(Write-downs) recoveries		(153	)		(111	)
Balance at end of period	$	1,137		$	3,034
Gains (losses), net on the sale of other real estate included in<br>   other real estate expense	$	(112	)	$	(455	)

At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, other real estate by type of property consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
1-4 family residential properties	$	865	$	1,128
Nonfarm, nonresidential properties		272		561
Other real estate properties		—		297
Total other real estate	$	1,137	$	1,986

At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, other real estate by geographic location consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Alabama	$	—	$	194
Mississippi (1)		1,137		1,769
Tennessee (2)		—		23
Total other real estate	$	1,137	$	1,986

(1)

Mississippi includes Central and Southern Mississippi Regions.

(2)

Tennessee includes Memphis, Tennessee and Northern Mississippi Regions.

At June 30, 2023, the balance of other real estate included $865 thousand of foreclosed residential real estate properties recorded as a result of obtaining physical possession of the property compared to $1.1 million at December 31, 2022. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process was $6.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively.

Note 6 – Leases

The following table details the components of net lease cost for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Finance leases:
Amortization of right-of-use assets	$	203		$	379		$	560		$	766
Interest on lease liabilities		41			48			83			97
Operating lease cost		1,319			1,293			2,604			2,568
Short-term lease cost		67			98			156			230
Variable lease cost		227			323			482			634
Sublease income		(3	)		(82	)		(6	)		(162	)
Net lease cost	$	1,854		$	2,059		$	3,879		$	4,133

The following table details the cash payments included in the measurement of lease liabilities during the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022
Finance leases:
Operating cash flows included in operating activities	$	83	$	97
Financing cash flows included in payments under finance lease obligations		535		733
Operating leases:
Operating cash flows (fixed payments) included in other operating activities, net		2,484		3,168
Operating cash flows (liability reduction) included in other operating activities, net		1,878		2,118

The following table details balance sheet information, as well as weighted-average lease terms and discount rates, related to leases at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023			December 31, 2022
Finance lease right-of-use assets, net of accumulated depreciation	$	3,977		$	4,537
Finance lease liabilities		4,520			5,055
Operating lease right-of-use assets		38,179			36,301
Operating lease liabilities		40,845			38,932
Weighted-average lease term:
Finance leases	8.85 years			8.72 years
Operating leases	10.05 years			9.64 years
Weighted-average discount rate:
Finance leases		3.62	%		3.49	%
Operating leases		3.52	%		3.22	%

At June 30, 2023, future minimum rental commitments under finance and operating leases were as follows ($ in thousands):

	Finance Leases			Operating Leases
2023 (excluding the six months ended June 30, 2023)	$	267		$	2,034
2024		572			5,242
2025		584			5,214
2026		589			4,961
2027		594			4,735
Thereafter		2,685			26,896
Total minimum lease payments		5,291			49,082
Less imputed interest		(771	)		(8,237	)
Lease liabilities	$	4,520		$	40,845

Note 7 – Deposits

At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, deposits consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	3,461,073	$	4,093,771
Interest-bearing demand		4,984,828		4,773,219
Savings		3,660,964		4,282,435
Time		2,807,035		1,288,223
Total	$	14,913,900	$	14,437,648

Note 8 – Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements

Trustmark utilizes securities sold under repurchase agreements as a source of borrowing in connection with overnight repurchase agreements offered to commercial deposit customers by using its unencumbered investment securities as collateral. Trustmark accounts for its securities sold under repurchase agreements as secured borrowings in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 860-30, “Transfers and Servicing – Secured Borrowing and Collateral.” Securities sold under repurchase agreements are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. Trustmark monitors collateral levels on a continual basis and may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. Securities sold under repurchase agreements were secured by securities with a carrying amount of $39.7 million and $102.4 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Trustmark’s repurchase agreements are transacted under master repurchase agreements that give Trustmark, in the event of default by the counterparty, the right of offset with the same counterparty. At both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, all repurchase agreements were short-term and consisted primarily of sweep repurchase arrangements, under which excess deposits are “swept” into overnight repurchase agreements with Trustmark. The following table presents the securities sold under repurchase agreements by collateral pledged at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage pass-through securities
Issued by FNMA and FHLMC	$	27,892	$	41,732
Other residential mortgage-backed securities
Issued or guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA		1,600		1,111
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
Issued or guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA		8,019		21,277
Total securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	37,511	$	64,120

Note 9 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Trustmark accounts for revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which provides that revenue be recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration Trustmark expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized either over time in a manner that depicts Trustmark’s performance, or at a point in time when control of the goods or services are transferred to the customer. Trustmark’s noninterest income, excluding all of mortgage banking, net and securities gains (losses), net and portions of bank card and other fees and other income, are considered within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 606. Gains or losses on the sale of other real estate, which are included in Trustmark’s noninterest expense as other real estate expense, are also within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 606.

Trustmark records a gain or loss from the sale of other real estate when control of the property transfers to the buyer. Trustmark records the gain or loss from the sale of other real estate in noninterest expense as other, net. Other real estate sales for the three months ended June 30, 2023 result in a net loss of $34 thousand compared to no net gain or loss for the three months ended June 30, 2022. Other real estate sales for the six months ended June 30, 2023 resulted in a net loss of $112 thousand compared to a net loss of $455 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2022.

36

---

The following tables present noninterest income disaggregated by reportable operating segment and revenue stream for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2023							Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Topic 606		Not Topic <br>606 (1)			Total		Topic 606		Not Topic <br>606 (1)		Total
General Banking Segment
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	10,673	$	—		$	10,673	$	10,205	$	—	$	10,205
Bank card and other fees		8,036		868			8,904		8,665		1,490		10,155
Mortgage banking, net		—		6,600			6,600		—		8,149		8,149
Wealth management		215		—			215		181		—		181
Other, net		2,932		(329	)		2,603		1,855		—		1,855
Total noninterest income	$	21,856	$	7,139		$	28,995	$	20,906	$	9,639	$	30,545
Wealth Management Segment
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	22	$	—		$	22	$	21	$	—	$	21
Bank card and other fees		13		—			13		12		—		12
Wealth management		8,667		—			8,667		8,921		—		8,921
Other, net		36		96			132		33		12		45
Total noninterest income	$	8,738	$	96		$	8,834	$	8,987	$	12	$	8,999
Insurance Segment
Insurance commissions	$	14,764	$	—		$	14,764	$	13,702	$	—	$	13,702
Other, net		960		—			960		7		—		7
Total noninterest income	$	15,724	$	—		$	15,724	$	13,709	$	—	$	13,709
Consolidated
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	10,695	$	—		$	10,695	$	10,226	$	—	$	10,226
Bank card and other fees		8,049		868			8,917		8,677		1,490		10,167
Mortgage banking, net		—		6,600			6,600		—		8,149		8,149
Insurance commissions		14,764		—			14,764		13,702		—		13,702
Wealth management		8,882		—			8,882		9,102		—		9,102
Other, net		3,928		(233	)		3,695		1,895		12		1,907
Total noninterest income	$	46,318	$	7,235		$	53,553	$	43,602	$	9,651	$	53,253

(1)

Noninterest income not in scope for FASB ASC Topic 606 includes customer derivatives revenue and miscellaneous credit card fee income within bank card and other fees; mortgage banking, net; amortization of tax credits, accretion of the FDIC indemnification asset, cash surrender value on various life insurance policies, earnings on Trustmark’s non-qualified deferred compensation plans, other partnership investments and rental income within other, net; and security gains (losses), net.

37

---

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2023							Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Topic 606		Not Topic <br>606 (1)			Total		Topic 606			Not Topic <br>606 (1)		Total
General Banking Segment
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	20,988	$	—		$	20,988	$	19,636		$	—	$	19,636
Bank card and other fees		15,679		1,017			16,696		16,082			2,505		18,587
Mortgage banking, net		—		14,239			14,239		—			18,022		18,022
Wealth management		448		—			448		205			—		205
Other, net		5,920		(937	)		4,983		4,373			657		5,030
Total noninterest income	$	43,035	$	14,319		$	57,354	$	40,296		$	21,184	$	61,480
Wealth Management Segment
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	43	$	—		$	43	$	41		$	—	$	41
Bank card and other fees		24		—			24		22			—		22
Wealth management		17,214		—			17,214		17,951			—		17,951
Other, net		81		191			272		65			19		84
Total noninterest income	$	17,362	$	191		$	17,553	$	18,079		$	19	$	18,098
Insurance Segment
Insurance commissions	$	29,069	$	—		$	29,069	$	27,791		$	—	$	27,791
Other, net		954		—			954		(1	)		—		(1	)
Total noninterest income	$	30,023	$	—		$	30,023	$	27,790		$	—	$	27,790
Consolidated
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	21,031	$	—		$	21,031	$	19,677		$	—	$	19,677
Bank card and other fees		15,703		1,017			16,720		16,104			2,505		18,609
Mortgage banking, net		—		14,239			14,239		—			18,022		18,022
Insurance commissions		29,069		—			29,069		27,791			—		27,791
Wealth management		17,662		—			17,662		18,156			—		18,156
Other, net		6,955		(746	)		6,209		4,437			676		5,113
Total noninterest income	$	90,420	$	14,510		$	104,930	$	86,165		$	21,203	$	107,368

(1)

Noninterest income not in scope for FASB ASC Topic 606 includes customer derivatives revenue and miscellaneous credit card fee income within bank card and other fees; mortgage banking, net; amortization of tax credits, accretion of the FDIC indemnification asset, cash surrender value on various life insurance policies, earnings on Trustmark’s non-qualified deferred compensation plans, other partnership investments and rental income within other, net; and security gains (losses), net.

Note 10 – Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Benefits

Qualified Pension Plan

Trustmark maintains a noncontributory tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan titled the Trustmark Corporation Pension Plan for Certain Employees of Acquired Financial Institutions (the Continuing Plan) to satisfy commitments made by Trustmark to associates covered through plans obtained in acquisitions.

The following table presents information regarding the net periodic benefit cost for the Continuing Plan for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Service cost	$	13		$	29		$	26		$	58
Interest cost		73			48			146			96
Expected return on plan assets		(27	)		(30	)		(53	)		(60	)
Recognized net loss due to lump sum settlements		—			—			25			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		—			60			—			120
Net periodic benefit cost	$	59		$	107		$	144		$	214

38

---

For the plan year ending December 31, 2023, Trustmark’s minimum required contribution to the Continuing Plan is $159 thousand; however, Management and the Board of Directors of Trustmark will monitor the Continuing Plan throughout 2023 to determine any additional funding requirements by the plan’s measurement date, which is December 31.

Supplemental Retirement Plans

Trustmark maintains a nonqualified supplemental retirement plan covering key executive officers and senior officers as well as directors who have elected to defer fees. The plan provides for retirement and/or death benefits based on a participant’s covered salary or deferred fees. Although plan benefits may be paid from Trustmark’s general assets, Trustmark has purchased life insurance contracts on the participants covered under the plan, which may be used to fund future benefit payments under the plan. The annual measurement date for the plan is December 31. As a result of mergers prior to 2014, Trustmark became the administrator of nonqualified supplemental retirement plans, for which the plan benefits were frozen prior to the merger date.

The following table presents information regarding the net periodic benefit cost for Trustmark’s nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022		2023		2022
Service cost	$	17	$	18	$	34	$	36
Interest cost		498		316		1,018		646
Amortization of prior service cost		27		27		55		55
Recognized net actuarial loss		69		244		146		499
Net periodic benefit cost	$	611	$	605	$	1,253	$	1,236

Note 11 – Stock and Incentive Compensation

Trustmark has granted restricted stock units subject to the provisions of the Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (the Stock Plan). Current outstanding and future grants of restricted stock units are subject to the provisions of the Stock Plan, which is designed to provide flexibility to Trustmark regarding its ability to motivate, attract and retain the services of key associates and directors. The Stock Plan also allows Trustmark to grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units to key associates and directors.

Restricted Stock Grants

Performance Units

Trustmark’s performance units vest over three years and are granted to Trustmark’s executive and senior management teams. Performance units granted vest based on performance goals of return on average tangible equity and total shareholder return. Performance units are valued utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate fair value of the units at the grant date. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed by an independent valuation consultant and requires the use of subjective modeling assumptions. These units are recognized using the straight-line method over the requisite service period. These units provide for achievement units if performance measures exceed 100%. The restricted stock agreement for these units provide for dividend privileges, but no voting rights.

Time-Based Units

Trustmark’s time-based units granted to Trustmark’s executive and senior management teams vest over three years. Trustmark’s time-based units granted to members of Trustmark’s Board of Directors vest over one year. Time-based units are valued utilizing the fair value of Trustmark’s stock at the grant date. These units are recognized on the straight-line method over the requisite service period. The restricted stock agreement for these units provide for dividend privileges, but no voting rights.

The following tables summarize the Stock Plan activity for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Performance<br>Units			Time-Vested<br>Units
Nonvested units, beginning of period		176,411			365,387
Granted		—			25,930
Released from restriction		—			(21,440	)
Forfeited		(2,197	)		(5,679	)
Nonvested units, end of period		174,214			364,198

39

---

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Performance<br>Units			Time-Vested<br>Units
Nonvested units, beginning of period		148,416			312,978
Granted		70,666			145,003
Released from restriction		(39,943	)		(87,541	)
Forfeited		(4,925	)		(6,242	)
Nonvested units, end of period		174,214			364,198

The following table presents information regarding compensation expense for units under the Stock Plan for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022		2023		2022
Performance units	$	454	$	406	$	732	$	535
Time-vested units		1,109		834		2,546		1,950
Total compensation expense	$	1,563	$	1,240	$	3,278	$	2,485

Note 12 – Contingencies

Lending Related

Trustmark makes commitments to extend credit and issues standby and commercial letters of credit (letters of credit) in the normal course of business in order to fulfill the financing needs of its customers. The carrying amount of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit approximates the fair value of such financial instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend money to customers pursuant to certain specified conditions. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Because many of these commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the commitments to extend credit is represented by the contract amount of those instruments. Trustmark applies the same credit policies and standards as it does in the lending process when making these commitments. The collateral obtained is based upon the nature of the transaction and the assessed creditworthiness of the borrower. At June 30, 2023 and 2022, Trustmark had unused commitments to extend credit of $5.120 billion and $5.103 billion, respectively.

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Trustmark to insure the performance of a customer to a third-party. A financial standby letter of credit irrevocably obligates Trustmark to pay a third-party beneficiary when a customer fails to repay an outstanding loan or debt instrument. A performance standby letter of credit irrevocably obligates Trustmark to pay a third-party beneficiary when a customer fails to perform some contractual, nonfinancial obligation. When issuing letters of credit, Trustmark uses the same policies regarding credit risk and collateral, which are followed in the lending process. At June 30, 2023 and 2022, Trustmark’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the customer for letters of credit was $142.7 million and $133.4 million, respectively. These amounts consist primarily of commitments with maturities of less than three years, which have an immaterial carrying value. Trustmark holds collateral to support standby letters of credit when deemed necessary. As of June 30, 2023 and 2022, the fair value of collateral held was $31.5 million and $37.7 million, respectively.

ACL on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures

Trustmark maintains a separate ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, which is included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Changes in the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures were as follows for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022			2023			2022
Balance at beginning of period	$	34,596	$	34,517		$	36,838		$	35,623
PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures		245		(1,568	)		(1,997	)		(2,674	)
Balance at end of period	$	34,841	$	32,949		$	34,841		$	32,949

Adjustments to the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures are recorded to PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures. The increase in the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the three months ended June 30, 2023 was primarily due to the weakening

40

---

macroeconomic forecasts. The decrease in the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the six months ended June 30, 2023 was primarily due to decreases in unfunded balances for the construction, land development and other land portfolio and other construction loan portfolio. The decrease in the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 was primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic forecasts.

No credit loss estimate is reported for off-balance sheet credit exposures that are unconditionally cancellable by Trustmark or for undrawn amounts under such arrangements that may be drawn prior to the cancellation of the arrangement.

Legal Proceedings

Trustmark’s wholly-owned subsidiary, TNB, has been named as a defendant in several lawsuits related to the collapse of the Stanford Financial Group.

On August 23, 2009, a purported class action complaint was filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, by Peggy Roif Rotstain, Guthrie Abbott, Catherine Burnell, Steven Queyrouze, Jaime Alexis Arroyo Bornstein and Juan C. Olano (collectively, Class Plaintiffs), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, naming TNB and four other financial institutions and one individual, each of which are unaffiliated with Trustmark, as defendants (the Rotstain Action). The complaint sought to recover (i) alleged fraudulent transfers from each of the defendants in the amount of fees and other monies received by each defendant from entities controlled by R. Allen Stanford (collectively, the Stanford Financial Group) and (ii) damages allegedly attributable to alleged conspiracies by one or more of the defendants with the Stanford Financial Group to commit fraud and/or aid and abet fraud on the asserted grounds that defendants knew or should have known the Stanford Financial Group was conducting an illegal and fraudulent scheme.

In November 2009, the lawsuit was removed to federal court by certain defendants and then transferred by the United States Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to federal court in the Northern District of Texas (Dallas), where multiple Stanford related matters have been consolidated for pre-trial proceedings. In May 2010, all defendants (including TNB) filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit. In August 2010, the court authorized and approved the formation of an Official Stanford Investors Committee (OSIC) to represent the interests of Stanford investors and, under certain circumstances, to file legal actions for the benefit of Stanford investors. In December 2011, the OSIC filed a motion to intervene in this action, which was granted in December 2012. The OSIC initially sought to recover from TNB and the other defendant financial institutions: (i) alleged fraudulent transfers in the amount of the fees each of the defendants allegedly received from Stanford Financial Group, the profits each of the defendants allegedly made from Stanford Financial Group deposits, and other monies each of the defendants allegedly received from Stanford Financial Group; (ii) damages attributable to alleged conspiracies by each of the defendants with the Stanford Financial Group to commit fraud and/or aid and abet fraud and conversion on the asserted grounds that the defendants knew or should have known the Stanford Financial Group was conducting an illegal and fraudulent scheme; and (iii) punitive damages.

In July 2013, all defendants (including TNB) filed motions to dismiss the OSIC’s claims. In March 2015, the court entered an order authorizing the parties to conduct discovery regarding class certification, staying all other discovery and setting a deadline for the parties to complete briefing on class certification issues. In April 2015, the court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss the Class Plaintiffs’ claims and the OSIC’s claims. The court dismissed all of the Class Plaintiffs’ fraudulent transfer claims and dismissed certain of the OSIC’s claims. The court denied the motions by TNB and the other financial institution defendants to dismiss the OSIC’s constructive fraudulent transfer claims.

On June 23, 2015, the court allowed the Class Plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Class Action Complaint (SAC), which asserted new claims against TNB and certain of the other defendants for (i) aiding, abetting and participating in a fraudulent scheme, (ii) aiding, abetting and participating in violations of the Texas Securities Act, (iii) aiding, abetting and participating in breaches of fiduciary duty, (iv) aiding, abetting and participating in conversion and (v) conspiracy. On July 14, 2015, the defendants (including TNB) filed motions to dismiss the SAC and to reconsider the court’s prior denial to dismiss the OSIC’s constructive fraudulent transfer claims against TNB and the other financial institutions that are defendants in the action. On July 27, 2016, the court denied the motion by TNB and the other financial institution defendants to dismiss the SAC and also denied the motion by TNB and the other financial institution defendants to reconsider the court’s prior denial to dismiss the OSIC’s constructive fraudulent transfer claims. On August 24, 2016, TNB filed its answer to the SAC. On October 20, 2017, the OSIC filed a motion seeking an order lifting the discovery stay and establishing a trial schedule. On November 4, 2016, the OSIC filed a First Amended Intervenor Complaint, which added claims for (i) aiding, abetting or participation in violations of the Texas Securities Act and (ii) aiding, abetting or participation in the breach of fiduciary duty. On November 7, 2017, the court denied the Class Plaintiffs’ motion seeking class certification and designation of class representatives and counsel, finding that common issues of fact did not predominate. The court granted the OSIC’s motion to lift the discovery stay that it had previously ordered.

On May 3, 2019, individual investors and entities filed motions to intervene in the action. On September 18, 2019, the court denied the motions to intervene. On October 14, 2019, certain of the proposed intervenors filed a notice of appeal. On February 3, 2021, the Fifth

41

---

Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of the motions to intervene; this decision was affirmed by a panel of the Fifth Circuit on March 12, 2021.

On February 12, 2021, all defendants (including TNB) filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to OSIC claims that applied to all defendants. In addition, on the same date, TNB filed a separate motion for summary judgment with respect to aspects of OSIC claims that applied specifically to TNB. On March 19, 2021, OSIC filed notice with the court that it was abandoning as against all of the defendants (including TNB) certain of the claims previously set forth in the SAC. As a result, only the claims for (i) aiding, abetting and participating in breaches of fiduciary duty, (ii) aiding, abetting and participating in violations of the Texas Securities Act, and (iii) punitive damages remain as against TNB. On January 20, 2022, the court denied TNB’s motion for summary judgment, as well as the motion for summary judgment filed by all defendants (including TNB) with respect to OSIC claims that apply to all defendants.

The parties to the action have agreed that the case is to be tried in the District Court for the Southern District of Texas. On March 25, 2021, the District Court for the Northern District of Texas rescinded its previously-issued trial scheduling orders so that the Southern District of Texas could set scheduling for this case once the case had in fact been remanded. On January 19, 2022, the judge of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas to whom the case was then assigned issued a recommendation to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the Panel) that the case be remanded to the District Court for the Southern District of Texas in light of that judge’s determination with respect to the summary judgment motions that triable issues of fact exist. On January 21, 2022, the Panel approved the remand of the case to the District Court for the Southern District of Texas, and on January 28, 2022 the remand of the case became effective. On June 9, 2022, the court entered an order scheduling trial beginning February 27, 2023, which will be held as a jury trial in front of Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt of the District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

On December 14, 2009, a different Stanford-related lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Ascension Parish, Louisiana, individually by Harold Jackson, Paul Blaine and Carolyn Bass Smith, Christine Nichols, and Ronald and Ramona Hebert naming TNB (misnamed as Trust National Bank) and other individuals and entities not affiliated with Trustmark as defendants (the Jackson Action). The complaint seeks to recover the money lost by these individual plaintiffs as a result of the collapse of the Stanford Financial Group (in addition to other damages) under various theories and causes of action, including negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, detrimental reliance, conspiracy, and violation of Louisiana’s uniform fiduciary, securities, and racketeering laws. The complaint does not quantify the amount of money the plaintiffs seek to recover. In January 2010, the lawsuit was removed to federal court by certain defendants and then transferred by the United States Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to federal court in the Northern District of Texas (Dallas) where multiple Stanford related matters are being consolidated for pre-trial proceedings. On March 29, 2010, the court stayed the case. TNB filed a motion to lift the stay, which was denied on February 28, 2012. In September 2012, the district court referred the case to a magistrate judge for hearing and determination of certain pretrial issues.

On April 11, 2016, Trustmark learned that a different Stanford-related lawsuit had been filed on that date in the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario, Canada, by The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank), naming TNB and three other financial institutions not affiliated with Trustmark as defendants (the TD Bank Declaratory Action). The complaint seeks a declaration specifying the degree to which each of TNB and the other defendants are liable in respect of any loss and damage for which TD Bank is found to be liable in separate litigation commenced against TD Bank brought by the joint liquidators of Stanford International Bank Limited in the Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List in Ontario, Canada (the Joint Liquidators’ Action), as well as contribution and indemnity in respect of any judgment, interest and costs TD Bank is ordered to pay in the Joint Liquidators’ Action. Trustmark understands that on or about June 8, 2021, after an extensive trial on the merits, the judge in the Joint Liquidators’ Action ruled in favor of TD Bank and found TD Bank not liable as to the claims asserted against the bank by the joint liquidators of Stanford International Bank Limited. The plaintiffs in the Joint Liquidators’ Action appealed this decision. On November 17, 2022, the intermediate appellate court in Canada dismissed the appeal. On January 16, 2023, the plaintiffs in the Joint Liquidators’ Action asked the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal. TNB was never served in connection with the TD Bank Declaratory Action (including any of the recent appeals), and thus has not made an appearance in that action.

On November 1, 2019, TNB was named as a defendant in a complaint filed by Paul Blaine Smith, Carolyn Bass Smith and other plaintiffs identified therein (the Smith Action and, collectively with the Rotstain Action and the Jackson Action, the Actions). The Smith Action was filed in Texas state court (District Court, Harris County, Texas) and named TNB and four other financial institutions and one individual, each of which are unaffiliated with Trustmark, as defendants. The Smith Action relates to the collapse of the Stanford Financial Group, as does the other pending litigation relating to Stanford summarized above. Plaintiffs in the Smith Action demanded a jury trial. On January 15, 2020, the court granted Stanford Financial Group receiver’s motion to stay the Texas state court action. On February 26, 2020, the lawsuit was removed to federal court in the Southern District of Texas by TNB.

On December 31, 2022, TNB agreed to a settlement in principle (the Settlement) relating to litigation involving the Stanford Financial Group. On January 13, 2023, TNB entered into a Settlement Agreement (the Settlement Agreement) reflecting the terms of the Settlement. The parties to the Settlement Agreement are, on the one hand, (i) Ralph S. Janvey, solely in his capacity as the court-appointed receiver (the Receiver) for the Stanford Receivership Estate; (ii) the Official Stanford Investors Committee; (iii) each of the

42

---

plaintiffs in the Rotstain and Smith Actions; and, on the other hand, (iv) Trustmark. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to settle and dismiss the Rotstain Action, the Smith Action, and all current or future claims by plaintiffs in either such Action arising from or related to Stanford. In addition, the Settlement Agreement provided that the parties would request dismissal of the Jackson Action pursuant to the terms of the bar orders described below. If the Court’s approval (as described below) of the Settlement Agreement, including the bar orders described below, is upheld on appeal, Trustmark will make a one-time cash payment of $100.0 million to the Receiver.

The Settlement Agreement included the parties’ agreement to seek the Northern District of Texas District Court’s entry of bar orders prohibiting any continued or future claims by the plaintiffs in the Actions or by any other person or entity against Trustmark and its related parties relating to Stanford, whether asserted to date or not. The bar orders therefore would prohibit all litigation relating to Stanford described herein, including not only the Actions and any pending matters but also any actions that may be brought in the future. Final Court approval of these bar orders is a condition of the Settlement.

The Settlement Agreement is also subject to notice to Stanford’s investor claimants (which has been provided) and final, non-appealable approval by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. While Trustmark believes that the Settlement Agreement is consistent with the terms of prior Stanford-related settlements that have been approved by the Court and were not successfully appealed, it is possible that the Court’s approval of the Settlement Agreement (which has occurred, as described further below) may not be upheld on appeal.

The Settlement Agreement also provides that Trustmark denies and makes no admission of liability or wrongdoing in connection with any Stanford matter. As has been the case throughout the pendency of the Actions, Trustmark expressly denies any liability or wrongdoing with respect to any matter alleged in regard to the multi-billion-dollar Ponzi scheme operated by Stanford for almost 20 years. Trustmark’s relationship with Stanford began as a result of Trustmark’s acquisition of a Houston-based bank in August 2006, and consisted of ordinary banking services provided to business deposit customers.

The foregoing description of the terms of the Settlement Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.ai to the 2022 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.

On January 20, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas entered an order preliminarily finding that the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and equitable; has no obvious deficiencies; and is the product of serious, informed, good faith, and arm’s-length negotiations. Following the provision of notice as required by the Settlement Agreement and by the Court’s preliminary order, the Court (Judge David C. Godbey, presiding) held a Final Approval Hearing on May 3, 2023, at which the Court approved the Settlement from the bench. On May 4, 2023, Judge Godbey signed the written orders confirming his oral ruling, including the bar order contemplated by the Settlement Agreement and the judgment and bar order with respect to the Jackson Action.

On May 11, 2023, Robert Allen Stanford, writing from prison, appealed the District Court’s approval of the Settlement to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. On June 12, 2023, the Receiver moved to dismiss the appeal as frivolous. On July 25, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit issued a per curiam order dismissing Stanford’s appeal as frivolous. On July 31, 2023, Stanford filed a document with the Fifth Circuit captioned “Emergency Petition for Panel Rehearing Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 40, and Motion for Stay of Mandate Pending Petition of Certiorari Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 41(d)(2)(B),” seeking an en banc rehearing by the Fifth Circuit of the July 25, 2023 order referred to above. On August 1, 2023, the Office of the Clerk of the Fifth Circuit notified Mr. Stanford of certain deficiencies in his July 31 filing, notifying him that if those deficiencies are not corrected by August 11, 2023, the filing will be stricken. Trustmark is not aware that Mr. Stanford has yet made the necessary corrective filing.

The Settlement will become effective when the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in favor of the approval of the Settlement becomes final and non-appealable (the Settlement Effective Date). Within five days of the Settlement Effective Date, the parties to the Rotstain and Smith Actions will file agreed dismissals of those cases. Absent any further appeal in either of the Rotstain or Smith Actions, those dismissals will become final 30 days after entered and signed by the respective judges. Trustmark will be required to make the Settlement payment within 30 days after those dismissals become final. Any further appeal of any of the orders described above would delay the making of the Settlement payment.

Pending the resolution of the settlement approval process, the Rotstain, Smith and Jackson Actions are stayed.

On December 30, 2019, a complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Northern Division by Alysson Mills in her capacity as Court-appointed Receiver (the Receiver) for Arthur Lamar Adams (Adams) and Madison Timber Properties, LLC (Madison Timber), naming TNB, two other Mississippi-based financial institutions both of which are unaffiliated with Trustmark and two individuals, one of who was employed by TNB at all times relevant to the complaint and the other was employed either by TNB or one of the other defendant financial institutions, as defendants. The complaint seeks to recover from

43

---

the defendants, for the benefit of the receivership estate and also for certain investors who were allegedly defrauded by Adams and Madison Timber, damages (including punitive damages) and related costs allegedly attributable to actions of the defendants that allegedly enabled illegal and fraudulent activities engaged in by Adams and Madison Timber. The Receiver did not quantify damages. By order issued by the court on September 30, 2021, the action to which TNB is a party was consolidated with three other pending cases for purposes of discovery, based upon a finding by the court that the actions involve overlapping questions of law and fact.

TNB’s relationship with Adams and Madison Timber consisted of traditional banking services in the ordinary course of business.

Trustmark and its subsidiaries are also parties to other lawsuits and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Some of the lawsuits assert claims related to the lending, collection, servicing, investment, trust and other business activities, and some of the lawsuits allege substantial claims for damages.

All pending legal proceedings described above are being vigorously contested, with the exception of the TD Bank Declaratory Action that, as noted above, Trustmark was not served in connection with. In accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 450-20, “Loss Contingencies,” Trustmark will establish an accrued liability for any litigation matter if and when such matter presents loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. As a result of the entry into the Settlement as described above, Trustmark recognized a $100.0 million litigation settlement expense included in noninterest expense related to the Stanford litigation during the fourth quarter of 2022, plus an additional $750 thousand in related legal fees. Trustmark expects that the Settlement will be tax deductible. Trustmark will remain substantially above levels considered to be well-capitalized under all relevant standards. At the present time, Trustmark believes, based on its evaluation and the advice of legal counsel, that a loss in any currently pending legal proceeding other than the settled Stanford litigation is not probable and a reasonable estimate cannot reasonably be made.

Note 13 – Earnings Per Share (EPS)

The following table reflects weighted-average shares used to calculate basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022		2023		2022
Basic shares		61,063		61,378		61,037		61,446
Dilutive shares		167		168		170		179
Diluted shares		61,230		61,546		61,207		61,625

Weighted-average antidilutive stock awards were excluded in determining diluted EPS. The following table reflects weighted-average antidilutive stock awards for the periods presented (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022		2023		2022
Weighted-average antidilutive stock awards		100		69		64		—

Note 14 – Statements of Cash Flows

The following table reflects specific transaction amounts for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022
Income taxes paid	$	26,023	$	1,058
Interest expense paid on deposits and borrowings		130,666		8,940
Noncash transfers from loans to other real estate		570		456
Operating right-of-use assets resulting from lease liabilities		4,403		2,892

Note 15 – Shareholders’ Equity

Regulatory Capital

Trustmark and TNB are subject to minimum risk-based capital and leverage capital requirements, as described in the section captioned “Capital Adequacy” included in Part I. Item 1. – Business of Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Report, which are administered by the federal bank regulatory agencies. These capital requirements, as defined by federal regulations, involve quantitative and qualitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet instruments. Trustmark’s and TNB’s minimum risk-based capital requirements include

44

---

a capital conservation buffer of 2.50%. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, is not included in computing regulatory capital. Trustmark elected the five-year phase-in transition period (through December 31, 2024) related to adopting FASB ASU 2016-13 for regulatory capital purposes. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements of Trustmark and TNB and limit Trustmark’s and TNB’s ability to pay dividends. As of June 30, 2023, Trustmark and TNB exceeded all applicable minimum capital standards. In addition, Trustmark and TNB met applicable regulatory guidelines to be considered well-capitalized at June 30, 2023. To be categorized in this manner, Trustmark and TNB maintained, as applicable, minimum common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the accompanying table, and were not subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive issued by their primary federal regulators to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measures. There are no significant conditions or events that have occurred since June 30, 2023, which Management believes have affected Trustmark’s or TNB’s present classification.

The following table provides Trustmark’s and TNB’s actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios under regulatory capital standards in effect at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	Actual
	Regulatory Capital					Minimum			To Be Well
	Amount		Ratio			Requirement			Capitalized
At June 30, 2023:
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Trustmark Corporation	$	1,476,755		9.87	%		7.00	%	n/a
Trustmark National Bank		1,561,498		10.43	%		7.00	%		6.50	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Trustmark Corporation	$	1,536,755		10.27	%		8.50	%	n/a
Trustmark National Bank		1,561,498		10.43	%		8.50	%		8.00	%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Trustmark Corporation	$	1,807,941		12.08	%		10.50	%	n/a
Trustmark National Bank		1,709,312		11.42	%		10.50	%		10.00	%
Tier 1 Leverage (to Average Assets)
Trustmark Corporation	$	1,536,755		8.35	%		4.00	%	n/a
Trustmark National Bank		1,561,498		8.50	%		4.00	%		5.00	%
At December 31, 2022:
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Trustmark Corporation	$	1,413,672		9.74	%		7.00	%	n/a
Trustmark National Bank		1,501,889		10.34	%		7.00	%		6.50	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Trustmark Corporation	$	1,473,672		10.15	%		8.50	%	n/a
Trustmark National Bank		1,501,889		10.34	%		8.50	%		8.00	%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Trustmark Corporation	$	1,729,499		11.91	%		10.50	%	n/a
Trustmark National Bank		1,634,454		11.26	%		10.50	%		10.00	%
Tier 1 Leverage (to Average Assets)
Trustmark Corporation	$	1,473,672		8.47	%		4.00	%	n/a
Trustmark National Bank		1,501,889		8.65	%		4.00	%		5.00	%

Stock Repurchase Program

On December 7, 2021, Trustmark's Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program effective January 1, 2022, under which $100.0 million of Trustmark's outstanding shares could be acquired through December 31, 2022. Under this authority, Trustmark repurchased approximately 789 thousand shares of its common stock valued at $24.6 million during 2022.

On December 6, 2022, Trustmark’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program effective January 1, 2023, under which $50.0 million of Trustmark’s outstanding shares may be acquired through December 31, 2023. The repurchase program, which is

45

---

subject to market conditions and management discretion, will be implemented through open market repurchases or privately negotiated transactions. No shares have been repurchased under this stock repurchase program.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following tables present the net change in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects allocated to each component for the periods presented ($ in thousands). The amortization of prior service cost, recognized net loss due to lump sum settlements and change in net actuarial loss are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (see Note 10 – Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Benefits for additional details). Reclassification adjustments related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans are included in salaries and employee benefits and other expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Reclassification adjustments related to the cash flow hedge derivatives are included in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2023									Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Before Tax<br>Amount			Tax (Expense)<br>Benefit			Net of Tax<br>Amount			Before Tax<br>Amount			Tax (Expense)<br>Benefit			Net of Tax<br>Amount
Securities available for sale and transferred securities:
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising <br>   during the period	$	(19,633	)	$	4,910		$	(14,723	)	$	(44,529	)	$	11,132		$	(33,397	)
Change in net unrealized holding loss on <br>   securities transferred to held to maturity		3,940			(985	)		2,955			(33,784	)		8,446			(25,338	)
Total securities available for sale <br>   and transferred securities		(15,693	)		3,925			(11,768	)		(78,313	)		19,578			(58,735	)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:
Reclassification adjustments for changes<br>   realized in net income:
Net change in prior service costs		27			(7	)		20			27			(6	)		21
Recognized net loss due to lump sum<br>   settlements		—			—			—			—			—			—
Change in net actuarial loss		69			(17	)		52			304			(76	)		228
Total pension and other postretirement<br>   benefit plans		96			(24	)		72			331			(82	)		249
Cash flow hedge derivatives:
Change in accumulated gain (loss) on effective<br>   cash flow hedge derivatives		(19,500	)		4,875			(14,625	)		—			—			—
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss realized <br>   in net income		3,997			(999	)		2,998			—			—			—
Total cash flow hedge derivatives		(15,503	)		3,876			(11,627	)		—			—			—
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(31,100	)	$	7,777		$	(23,323	)	$	(77,982	)	$	19,496		$	(58,486	)

46

---

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2023									Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Before Tax<br>Amount			Tax (Expense)<br>Benefit			Net of Tax<br>Amount			Before Tax<br>Amount			Tax (Expense)<br>Benefit			Net of Tax<br>Amount
Securities available for sale and transferred securities:
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising <br>   during the period	$	10,901		$	(2,494	)	$	8,407		$	(200,200	)	$	50,050		$	(150,150	)
Change in net unrealized holding loss on <br>   securities transferred to held to maturity		7,799			(1,950	)		5,849			(33,251	)		8,313			(24,938	)
Total securities available for sale <br>   and transferred securities		18,700			(4,444	)		14,256			(233,451	)		58,363			(175,088	)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:
Reclassification adjustments for changes<br>   realized in net income:
Net change in prior service costs		55			(14	)		41			55			(14	)		41
Recognized net loss due to lump sum<br>   settlements		25			(6	)		19			—			—			—
Change in net actuarial loss		146			(36	)		110			619			(154	)		465
Total pension and other postretirement<br>   benefit plans		226			(56	)		170			674			(168	)		506
Cash flow hedge derivatives:
Change in accumulated gain (loss) on effective<br>   cash flow hedge derivatives		(13,231	)		3,308			(9,923	)		—			—			—
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss realized <br>   in net income		6,928			(1,732	)		5,196			—			—			—
Total cash flow hedge derivatives		(6,303	)		1,576			(4,727	)		—			—			—
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	$	12,623		$	(2,924	)	$	9,699		$	(232,777	)	$	58,195		$	(174,582	)

The following table presents the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the periods presented ($ in thousands). All amounts are presented net of tax.

	Securities <br>Available for Sale <br>and Transferred <br>Securities			Defined<br>Benefit <br>Pension Items			Cash Flow <br>Hedge <br>Derivatives			Total
Balance at January 1, 2023	$	(254,442	)	$	(5,792	)	$	(15,169	)	$	(275,403	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification		14,256			—			(9,923	)		4,333
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other <br>   comprehensive income (loss)		—			170			5,196			5,366
Net other comprehensive income (loss)		14,256			170			(4,727	)		9,699
Balance at June 30, 2023	$	(240,186	)	$	(5,622	)	$	(19,896	)	$	(265,704	)
Balance at January 1, 2022	$	(17,774	)	$	(14,786	)	$	—		$	(32,560	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification		(175,088	)		—			—			(175,088	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other <br>   comprehensive income (loss)		—			506			—			506
Net other comprehensive income (loss)		(175,088	)		506			—			(174,582	)
Balance at June 30, 2022	$	(192,862	)	$	(14,280	)	$	—		$	(207,142	)

Note 16 – Fair Value

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value

The methodologies Trustmark uses in determining the fair values are based primarily on the use of independent, market-based data to reflect a value that would be reasonably expected upon exchange of the position in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The predominant portion of assets that are stated at fair value are of a nature that can be valued using prices or inputs that are readily observable through a variety of independent data providers. The providers selected by Trustmark for fair valuation data are widely recognized and accepted vendors whose evaluations support the pricing functions of financial institutions, investment and mutual funds, and portfolio managers. Trustmark has documented and evaluated the pricing methodologies used by the vendors and maintains internal processes that regularly test valuations for anomalies.

Trustmark utilizes an independent pricing service to advise it on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio. As part of Trustmark’s procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. When a questionable price exists, Trustmark investigates further to determine if the price is valid. If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value. Trustmark has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in thorough discussions with the pricing source regarding their methods of price discovery.

Mortgage loan commitments are valued based on the securities prices of similar collateral, term, rate and delivery for which the loan is eligible to deliver in place of the particular security. Trustmark acquires a broad array of mortgage security prices that are supplied by a market data vendor, which in turn accumulates prices from a broad list of securities dealers. Prices are processed through a mortgage pipeline management system that accumulates and segregates all loan commitment and forward-sale transactions according to the similarity of various characteristics (maturity, term, rate, and collateral). Prices are matched to those positions that are deemed to be an eligible substitute or offset (i.e., “deliverable”) for a corresponding security observed in the marketplace.

Trustmark estimates fair value of the MSR through the use of prevailing market participant assumptions and market participant valuation processes. This valuation is periodically tested and validated against other third-party firm valuations.

Trustmark obtains the fair value of interest rate swaps from a third-party pricing service that uses an industry standard discounted cash flow methodology. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk. In adjusting the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, Trustmark has considered any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. In conjunction with the FASB’s fair value measurement guidance, Trustmark made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of these derivative financial instruments, which are subject to master netting agreements, on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

Trustmark has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swaps offered to qualified commercial borrowers fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, while the credit valuation adjustments associated with these derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads. Trustmark has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest rate swaps and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of these derivatives. As a result, Trustmark classifies its interest rate swap valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Trustmark also utilizes exchange-traded derivative instruments such as Treasury note futures contracts and option contracts to achieve a fair value return that offsets the changes in fair value of the MSR attributable to interest rates. Fair values of these derivative instruments are determined from quoted prices in active markets for identical assets therefore allowing them to be classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, Trustmark utilizes derivative instruments such as interest rate lock commitments in its mortgage banking area which lack observable inputs for valuation purposes resulting in their inclusion in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

At this time, Trustmark presents no fair values that are derived through internal modeling. Should positions requiring fair valuation arise that are not relevant to existing methodologies, Trustmark will make every reasonable effort to obtain market participant assumptions, or independent evaluation.

48

---

Financial Assets and Liabilities

The following tables summarize financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value ($ in thousands). There were no transfers between fair value levels for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022.

	June 30, 2023
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
U.S. Treasury securities	$	362,966	$	362,966	$	—	$	—
U.S. Government agency obligations		6,999		—		6,999		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		4,813		—		4,813		—
Mortgage-backed securities		1,497,105		—		1,497,105		—
Securities available for sale		1,871,883		362,966		1,508,917		—
LHFS		181,094		—		181,094		—
MSR		134,350		—		—		134,350
Other assets - derivatives		11,051		14		10,566		471
Other liabilities - derivatives		47,419		3,008		44,411		—
	December 31, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
U.S. Treasury securities	$	391,513	$	391,513	$	—	$	—
U.S. Government agency obligations		7,766		—		7,766		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		4,862		—		4,862		—
Mortgage-backed securities		1,619,941		—		1,619,941		—
Securities available for sale		2,024,082		391,513		1,632,569		—
LHFS		135,226		—		135,226		—
MSR		129,677		—		—		129,677
Other assets - derivatives		8,871		54		8,660		157
Other liabilities - derivatives		45,379		474		44,905		—

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are summarized as follows ($ in thousands):

	MSR			Other Assets -<br>Derivatives
Balance, January 1, 2023	$	129,677		$	157
Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net (1)		(1,929	)		1,553
Additions		6,602			—
Sales		—			(1,239	)
Balance, June 30, 2023	$	134,350		$	471
The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings<br>   that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or <br>   losses still held at June 30, 2023	$	1,926		$	514
Balance, January 1, 2022	$	87,687		$	1,859
Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net (1)		23,168			769
Additions		10,159			—
Sales		—			(1,046	)
Balance, June 30, 2022	$	121,014		$	1,582
The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in<br>   earnings that are attributable to the change in unrealized<br>   gains or losses still held at June 30, 2022	$	30,759		$	(411	)

(1)

Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net relating to the MSR includes changes in fair value due to market changes and due to run-off.

49

---

Trustmark may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Assets at June 30, 2023, which have been measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, include collateral-dependent LHFI. A loan is collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral. The expected credit loss for collateral-dependent loans is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis of the loan and the fair value of the collateral, adjusted for the estimated cost to sell. Fair value estimates for collateral-dependent loans are derived from appraised values based on the current market value or as is value of the collateral, normally from recently received and reviewed appraisals. Current appraisals are ordered on an annual basis based on the inspection date or more often if market conditions necessitate. Appraisals are obtained from state-certified appraisers and are based on certain assumptions, which may include construction or development status and the highest and best use of the property. These appraisals are reviewed by Trustmark’s Appraisal Review Department to ensure they are acceptable, and values are adjusted down for costs associated with asset disposal. At June 30, 2023, Trustmark had outstanding balances of $38.0 million with a related ACL of $17.6 million in collateral-dependent LHFI, compared to outstanding balances of $40.3 million with a related ACL of $17.7 million in collateral-dependent LHFI at December 31, 2022. The collateral-dependent LHFI are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities

Certain nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include foreclosed assets (upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment), nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, and intangible assets and other nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.

Other real estate includes assets that have been acquired in satisfaction of debt through foreclosure and is recorded at the fair value less cost to sell (estimated fair value) at the time of foreclosure. Fair value is based on independent appraisals and other relevant factors. In the determination of fair value subsequent to foreclosure, Management also considers other factors or recent developments, such as changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and anticipated sales values considering plans for disposition, which could result in an adjustment to lower the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals. Periodic revaluations are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy since assumptions are used that may not be observable in the market.

Foreclosed assets of $430 thousand were remeasured during the first six months of 2023, requiring write-downs of $158 thousand to reach their current fair values compared to $2.9 million of foreclosed assets that were remeasured during the first six months of 2022, requiring write-downs of $871 thousand.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, are as follows ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023				December 31, 2022
	Carrying<br>Value		Estimated<br>Fair Value		Carrying<br>Value		Estimated<br>Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Level 2 Inputs:
Cash and short-term investments	$	832,052	$	832,052	$	738,787	$	738,787
Securities held to maturity		1,458,665		1,366,377		1,494,514		1,406,589
Level 3 Inputs:
Net LHFI		12,484,669		12,335,167		12,083,825		11,850,318
Financial Liabilities:
Level 2 Inputs:
Deposits		14,913,900		14,881,501		14,437,648		14,404,661
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under<br>   repurchase agreements		311,179		311,179		449,331		449,331
Other borrowings		1,056,714		1,056,709		1,050,938		1,050,932
Subordinated notes		123,372		103,438		123,262		113,125
Junior subordinated debt securities		61,856		46,083		61,856		46,392

50

---

Fair Value Option

Trustmark has elected to account for its mortgage LHFS under the fair value option, with interest income on these mortgage LHFS reported in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI. The fair value of the mortgage LHFS is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset, adjusted for specific attributes of that loan. The mortgage LHFS are actively managed and monitored and certain market risks of the loans may be mitigated through the use of derivatives. These derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net. The changes in the fair value of LHFS are largely offset by changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, net losses of $1.2 million and $238 thousand, respectively, were recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net for changes in the fair value of LHFS accounted for under the fair value option, compared to a net gain of $3.3 million and a net loss of $2.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022. Interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 included $2.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, of interest earned on LHFS accounted for under the fair value option, compared to $1.9 million and $3.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, respectively. Election of the fair value option allows Trustmark to reduce the accounting volatility that would otherwise result from the asymmetry created by accounting for the financial instruments at the lower of cost or fair value and the derivatives at fair value. The fair value option election does not apply to GNMA optional repurchase loans which do not meet the requirements under FASB ASC Topic 825 to be accounted for under the fair value option. GNMA optional repurchase loans totaled $52.1 million and $70.8 million at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, and are included in LHFS on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For additional information regarding GNMA optional repurchase loans, please see the section captioned “Past Due LHFS” included in Note 3 – LHFI and ACL, LHFI.

The following table provides information about the fair value and the contractual principal outstanding of LHFS accounted for under the fair value option at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Fair value of LHFS	$	128,968	$	64,421
LHFS contractual principal outstanding		128,430		63,427
Fair value less unpaid principal	$	538	$	994

Note 17 – Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

During the third quarter of 2022, Trustmark initiated a cash flow hedging program. Trustmark's objectives in initiating this hedging program were to add stability to interest income and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of fixed-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for Trustmark making variable-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate floor spreads designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts if interest rates fall below the purchased floor strike rate on the contract and payments of variable-rate amounts if interest rates fall below the sold floor strike rate on the contract. Trustmark uses such derivatives to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing and anticipated variable-rate loan assets. At June 30, 2023, the aggregate notional value of Trustmark's interest rate swaps and floor spreads designated as cash flow hedges totaled $975.0 million compared to $825.0 million at December 31, 2022.

Trustmark records any gains or losses on these cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses on derivatives representing hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized over the life of the hedge on a systematic and rational basis, as documented at hedge inception in accordance with Trustmark’s accounting policy election. The earnings recognition of excluded components totaled $13 thousand and $22 thousand of amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, and are included in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI. As interest payments are received on Trustmark's variable-rate assets, amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified into interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI in the accompanying consolidated statements of income during the same period. During the next twelve months, Trustmark estimates that $17.7 million will be reclassified as a reduction to interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI. This amount could differ due to changes in interest rates, hedge de-designations or the addition of other hedges.

51

---

Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Trustmark utilizes a portfolio of exchange-traded derivative instruments, such as Treasury note futures contracts and option contracts, to achieve a fair value return that economically hedges changes in the fair value of the MSR attributable to interest rates. These transactions are considered freestanding derivatives that do not otherwise qualify for hedge accounting. The total notional amount of these derivative instruments was $277.5 million at June 30, 2023 compared to $277.0 million at December 31, 2022. Changes in the fair value of these exchange-traded derivative instruments are recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and are offset by changes in the fair value of the MSR. The impact of this strategy resulted in a net negative ineffectiveness of $1.3 million and $632 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, the impact was a net negative ineffectiveness of $3.1 million and a net positive ineffectiveness of $374 thousand, respectively.

As part of Trustmark’s risk management strategy in the mortgage banking area, derivative instruments such as forward sales contracts are utilized. Trustmark’s obligations under forward sales contracts consist of commitments to deliver mortgage loans, originated and/or purchased, in the secondary market at a future date. Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and are offset by changes in the fair value of LHFS. Trustmark’s off-balance sheet obligations under these derivative instruments totaled $172.5 million at June 30, 2023, with a positive valuation adjustment of $1.0 million, compared to $97.0 million, with a positive valuation adjustment of $168 thousand, at December 31, 2022.

Trustmark also utilizes derivative instruments such as interest rate lock commitments in its mortgage banking area. Interest rate lock commitments are residential mortgage loan commitments with customers, which guarantee a specified interest rate for a specified time period. Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and are offset by the changes in the fair value of forward sales contracts. Trustmark’s off-balance sheet obligations under these derivative instruments totaled $122.7 million at June 30, 2023, with a positive valuation adjustment of $471 thousand, compared to $68.4 million, with a positive valuation adjustment of $157 thousand, at December 31, 2022.

Trustmark offers certain derivatives products directly to qualified commercial lending clients seeking to manage their interest rate risk. Trustmark economically hedges interest rate swap transactions executed with commercial lending clients by entering into offsetting interest rate swap transactions with institutional derivatives market participants. Derivatives transactions executed as part of this program are not designated as qualifying hedging relationships and are, therefore, carried at fair value with the change in fair value recorded as noninterest income in bank card and other fees. Because these derivatives have mirror-image contractual terms, in addition to collateral provisions which mitigate the impact of non-performance risk, the changes in fair value are expected to substantially offset. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange rules legally characterize variation margin collateral payments made or received for centrally cleared interest rate swaps as settlements rather than collateral. As a result, centrally cleared interest rate swaps included in other assets and other liabilities are presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2023, Trustmark had interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.420 billion related to this program, compared to $1.391 billion at December 31, 2022.

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features

Trustmark has agreements with its financial institution counterparties that contain provisions where if Trustmark defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then Trustmark could also be declared in default on its derivatives obligations.

At both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, there was no termination value of interest rate swaps in a liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, Trustmark had posted collateral of $1.2 million and $740 thousand, respectively, against its obligations because of negotiated thresholds and minimum transfer amounts under these agreements. If Trustmark had breached any of these triggering provisions at June 30, 2023, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value.

Credit risk participation agreements arise when Trustmark contracts with other financial institutions, as a guarantor or beneficiary, to share credit risk associated with certain interest rate swaps. These agreements provide for reimbursement of losses resulting from a third-party default on the underlying swap. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, Trustmark had entered into five risk participation agreements as a beneficiary with aggregate notional amounts of $49.5 million and $50.2 million, respectively. At June 30, 2023, Trustmark had entered into thirty-one risk participation agreements as a guarantor with an aggregate notional amount of $246.3 million compared to twenty-nine risk participation agreements as a guarantor with an aggregate notional amount of $235.8 million at December 31, 2022. The aggregate fair values of these risk participation agreements were immaterial at both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

52

---

Tabular Disclosures

The following tables disclose the fair value of derivative instruments in Trustmark’s consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 as well as the effect of these derivative instruments on Trustmark’s results of operations for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023			December 31, 2022
Derivatives in hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Interest rate swaps included in other assets (1)	$	446		$	—
Interest rate floors included in other assets		348			—
Interest rate swaps included in other liabilities (1)		189			761
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts:
Exchange traded purchased options included in other assets	$	14		$	38
OTC written options (rate locks) included in other assets		471			157
Futures contracts included in other assets		—			16
Interest rate swaps included in other assets (1)		9,768			8,654
Credit risk participation agreements included in other assets		4			6
Futures contracts included in other liabilities		2,586			268
Forward contracts included in other liabilities		(1,027	)		(168	)
Exchange traded written options included in other liabilities		422			206
Interest rate swaps included in other liabilities (1)		45,231			44,304
Credit risk participation agreements included in other liabilities		18			8

(1)

In accordance with GAAP, the variation margin collateral payments made or received for interest rate swaps that are centrally cleared are legally characterized as settled. As a result, the centrally cleared interest rate swaps included in other assets and other liabilities are presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Derivatives in hedging relationships:
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other <br> comprehensive income (loss) and recognized in <br> interest and fees on LHFS & LHFI	$	(3,997	)	$	—		$	(6,928	)	$	—
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in mortgage banking, net	$	(6,347	)	$	(13,258	)	$	(3,892	)	$	(30,776	)
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in bank card and other fees		200			(87	)		190			322

The following table discloses the amount included in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for derivative instruments

designated as cash flow hedges for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022		2023			2022
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationship
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive <br>   income (loss), net of tax	$	(14,625	)	$	—	$	(9,923	)	$	—

53

---

Trustmark’s interest rate swap derivative instruments are subject to master netting agreements, and therefore, eligible for offsetting in the consolidated balance sheets. Trustmark has elected to not offset any derivative instruments in its consolidated balance sheets. Information about financial instruments that are eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 is presented in the following tables ($ in thousands):

Offsetting of Derivative Assets
As of June 30, 2023
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the<br>Statement of Financial Position
	Gross <br>Amounts of <br>Recognized <br>Assets		Gross Amounts<br>Offset in the<br>Statement of<br>Financial Position		Net Amounts of<br>Assets presented in<br>the Statement of<br>Financial Position		Financial <br>Instruments			Cash Collateral <br>Received			Net Amount
Derivatives	$	10,562	$	—	$	10,562	$	(1,189	)	$	(1,230	)	$	8,143
Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
As of June 30, 2023
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the <br>Statement of Financial Position
	Gross <br>Amounts of <br>Recognized<br>Liabilities		Gross Amounts<br>Offset in the<br>Statement of<br>Financial Position		Net Amounts of <br>Liabilities presented <br>in the Statement of <br>Financial Position		Financial<br>Instruments			Cash Collateral<br>Posted			Net Amount
Derivatives	$	45,420	$	—	$	45,420	$	(1,189	)	$	(1,230	)	$	43,001
Offsetting of Derivative Assets
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
As of December 31, 2022
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the <br>Statement of Financial Position
	Gross <br>Amounts of <br>Recognized <br>Assets		Gross Amounts<br>Offset in the<br>Statement of<br>Financial Position		Net Amounts of<br>Assets presented in<br>the Statement of<br>Financial Position		Financial <br>Instruments		Cash Collateral<br>Received			Net Amount
Derivatives	$	9,415	$	—	$	9,415	$	—	$	(2,230	)	$	7,185
Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
As of December 31, 2022
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the <br>Statement of Financial Position
	Gross <br>Amounts of <br>Recognized<br>Liabilities		Gross Amounts <br>Offset in the <br>Statement of <br>Financial Position		Net Amounts of<br>Liabilities presented<br>in the Statement of<br>Financial Position		Financial <br>Instruments		Cash Collateral<br>Posted			Net Amount
Derivatives	$	44,304	$	—	$	44,304	$	—	$	(740	)	$	43,564

Note 18 – Segment Information

Trustmark’s management reporting structure includes three segments: General Banking, Wealth Management and Insurance. For a complete overview of Trustmark’s operating segments, see Note 20 – Segment Information included in Part II. Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Report.

The accounting policies of each reportable segment are the same as those of Trustmark except for its internal allocations. Noninterest expenses for back-office operations support are allocated to segments based on estimated uses of those services. Trustmark measures the net interest income of its business segments with a process that assigns cost of funds or earnings credit on a matched-term basis. This process, called “funds transfer pricing”, charges an appropriate cost of funds to assets held by a business unit, or credits the business unit for potential earnings for carrying liabilities. The net of these charges and credits flows through to the General Banking Segment, which contains the management team responsible for determining TNB’s funding and interest rate risk strategies.

54

---

The following table discloses financial information by reportable segment for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
General Banking
Net interest income	$	138,378		$	111,352		$	274,537		$	209,343
Provision for credit losses		8,435			1,149			9,369			(810	)
Noninterest income		28,995			30,545			57,354			61,480
Noninterest expense		113,694			106,352			223,284			209,685
Income before income taxes		45,244			34,396			99,238			61,948
Income taxes		5,855			5,074			13,779			8,175
General banking net income	$	39,389		$	29,322		$	85,459		$	53,773
Selected Financial Information
Total assets	$	18,121,681		$	16,661,715		$	18,121,681		$	16,661,715
Depreciation and amortization	$	8,570		$	9,995		$	16,013		$	20,171
Wealth Management
Net interest income	$	1,529		$	1,326		$	2,968		$	2,682
Provision for credit losses		21			(1	)		89			(8	)
Noninterest income		8,834			8,999			17,553			18,098
Noninterest expense		7,961			8,131			15,995			16,413
Income before income taxes		2,381			2,195			4,437			4,375
Income taxes		597			548			1,110			1,094
Wealth management net income	$	1,784		$	1,647		$	3,327		$	3,281
Selected Financial Information
Total assets	$	206,556		$	199,752		$	206,556		$	199,752
Depreciation and amortization	$	67		$	73		$	136		$	146
Insurance
Net interest income	$	(3	)	$	(2	)	$	(6	)	$	(5	)
Noninterest income		15,724			13,709			30,023			27,790
Noninterest expense		10,563			9,284			21,266			19,188
Income before income taxes		5,158			4,423			8,751			8,597
Income taxes		1,294			1,108			2,200			2,156
Insurance net income	$	3,864		$	3,315		$	6,551		$	6,441
Selected Financial Information
Total assets	$	94,389		$	90,043		$	94,389		$	90,043
Depreciation and amortization	$	145		$	176		$	299		$	368
Consolidated
Net interest income	$	139,904		$	112,676		$	277,499		$	212,020
Provision for credit losses		8,456			1,148			9,458			(818	)
Noninterest income		53,553			53,253			104,930			107,368
Noninterest expense		132,218			123,767			260,545			245,286
Income before income taxes		52,783			41,014			112,426			74,920
Income taxes		7,746			6,730			17,089			11,425
Consolidated net income	$	45,037		$	34,284		$	95,337		$	63,495
Selected Financial Information
Total assets	$	18,422,626		$	16,951,510		$	18,422,626		$	16,951,510
Depreciation and amortization	$	8,782		$	10,244		$	16,448		$	20,685

Note 19 – Accounting Policies Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Policies Recently Adopted

Except for the changes detailed below, Trustmark has consistently applied its accounting policies to all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2022-02, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Trouble Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures.” Issued in March 2022, ASU 2022-02 seeks to improve the decision usefulness of information provided to investors concerning certain loan refinancings, restructurings and write-offs. In regard to troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) by creditors, investors and preparers observed that the additional designation of a loan modification as a TDR and the related accounting are unnecessarily complex and no longer provide decision-useful information. The amendments of ASU 2022-02 eliminate the accounting guidance for TDRs by creditors in FASB ASC Subtopic 310-40, “Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors,” as it is no longer meaningful due to the implementation of FASB ASC Topic 326, which requires an entity to consider lifetime expected credit losses on loans when establishing an allowance for credit losses. Therefore, most losses that would have been realized for a TDR under FASB ASC Subtopic 310-40 are now captured by the accounting required under FASB ASC Topic 326. The amendments of ASU 2022-02 also enhanced disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. Stakeholders also noted inconsistency in the requirement for a public business entity (PBE) to disclose gross write-offs and gross recoveries by class of financing receivable and major security type in certain vintage disclosures. Financial statement users expressed that, in addition to the existing vintage disclosures in FASB ASC Topic 326, information about gross write-offs by year of origination would be helpful in understanding credit quality changes in an entity’s loan portfolio and underwriting performance. For PBEs, the amendments of ASU 2022-02 require that an entity disclose current period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases within the scope of FASB ASC Subtopic 326-20, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses-Measured at Amortized Cost.” For write-offs associated with origination dates that are more than five annual periods before the reporting period, an entity may present aggregate amounts in the current period for financing receivables and net investment in leases. The amendments of ASU 2022-02 are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 for entities that have already adopted the amendments of ASU 2016-13. Early adoption is permitted, provided that an entity has adopted ASU 2016-13. If an entity elects to early adopt the amendments of this ASU during an interim period, the guidance should be applied as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. In addition, an entity may elect to early adopt the amendments about TDRs and related disclosure enhancements separately from the amendments related to vintage disclosures. Trustmark adopted the amendments of ASU 2022-02 effective January 1, 2023. The amendments of ASU 2022-02 include only changes to certain financial statement disclosures; and, therefore, adoption of ASU 2022-02 did not have a material impact on Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations. The enhanced disclosures required by ASU 2022-02 are presented in Note 3 - LHFI and ACL, LHFI of this report.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following provides a narrative discussion and analysis of Trustmark Corporation’s (Trustmark) financial condition and results of operations. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the supplemental financial data included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Description of Business

Trustmark, a Mississippi business corporation incorporated in 1968, is a bank holding company headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi. Trustmark’s principal subsidiary is Trustmark National Bank (TNB), initially chartered by the State of Mississippi in 1889. At June 30, 2023, TNB had total assets of $18.420 billion, which represented approximately 99.99% of the consolidated assets of Trustmark.

Through TNB and its other subsidiaries, Trustmark operates as a financial services organization providing banking and other financial solutions through offices and 2,761 full-time equivalent associates (measured at June 30, 2023) located in the states of Alabama (includes the Georgia Loan Production Office (LPO), which are collectively referred to herein as Trustmark's Alabama market region), Florida (primarily in the northwest or “Panhandle” region of that state, which is referred to herein as Trustmark’s Florida market), Mississippi, Tennessee (in the Memphis and Northern Mississippi regions, which are collectively referred to herein as Trustmark’s Tennessee market), and Texas (primarily in Houston, which is referred to herein as Trustmark’s Texas market). Trustmark’s operations are managed along three operating segments: General Banking Segment, Wealth Management Segment and Insurance Segment. For a complete overview of Trustmark’s business, see the section captioned “The Corporation” included in Part I. Item 1. – Business of Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (2022 Annual Report).

Executive Overview

Trustmark's financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 reflected solid growth in loans held for investment (LHFI) of $116.8 million, or 0.9%, and $409.9 million, or 3.4%, respectively, as well as growth in deposits of $130.2 million, or 0.9%, and $476.3 million, or 3.3%, respectively, expansion of net interest income, growth in its fee-based businesses and continued credit quality strength. Trustmark's strong financial performance during the first six months of 2023 was achieved despite the challenging financial services environment and increasingly competitive deposit costs. Trustmark remains well-positioned and committed to meeting the banking and financial needs of its customers and the communities it serves, and remains focused on providing support, advice and solutions to meet its customers’ unique needs.

Trustmark is committed to managing the franchise for the long term, supporting investments to promote profitable revenue growth, realigning delivery channels to support changing customer preferences as well as reengineering and efficiency opportunities to enhance long-term shareholder value. Trustmark's capital position remained solid, reflecting the consistent profitability of its diversified financial services businesses. Trustmark’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.23 per share. The dividend is payable September 15, 2023, to shareholders of record on September 1, 2023.

Recent Economic and Industry Developments

Economic activity improved slightly during the first six months of 2023; however, economic concerns remain as a result of the cumulative weight of uncertainty regarding the potential economic impact of geopolitical developments, such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine, inflation, the consequences of recent bank failures and other economic and industry volatility, supply chain issues, higher energy prices and broader price pressures. Doubts surrounding the near-term direction of global markets and the potential impact on the United States economy are expected to persist for the near term. While Trustmark's customer base is wholly domestic, international economic conditions affect domestic economic conditions, and thus may have an impact upon Trustmark's financial condition or results of operations.

Market interest rates began to rise during 2022 after an extended period at historical lows and have continued to rise in 2023. Starting in March 2022, the FRB began raising the target federal funds rate for the first time in three years and continued with multiple increases throughout 2022 and the first six months of 2023, up to a range of 5.00% to 5.25% as of June 2023. The FRB also signaled the possibility of additional rate increases. In addition, the FRB increased the interest that it pays on reserves multiple times during 2022 and the first six months of 2023 from 0.10% to 5.15% as of June 2023. As interest rates have increased, so have competitive pressures on the deposit cost of funds. This has been exacerbated by recent bank failures and the resulting heightened competition for deposits, which has also affected the interest that Trustmark pays on deposits. It is not possible to predict the pace and magnitude of changes in interest rates, or the impact rate changes will have on Trustmark's results of operations.

In the July 2023 “Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions by Federal Reserve District,” the twelve Federal Reserve Districts’ reports suggested that economic activity during the reporting period (covering the period from May 23, 2023 through June 30, 2023) increased slightly; however, conditions varied across Federal Reserve Districts (Districts). Reports by the twelve Districts noted the following during the reporting period:

• Consumer spending reports were mixed; growth was generally observed in consumer services, but retailers noted shifts away from discretionary spending. Tourism and travel activity was robust. Auto sales remained unchanged or exhibited moderate growth across most Districts. Manufacturing activity edged up in half the Districts and declined in the other half. Transportation activity was down or flat in most Districts, as some contacts reported reduced demand due to high inventory levels and others noted continued challenges from labor shortages.

• Banking conditions were mostly subdued, as lending activity continued to soften. Despite higher mortgage rates, demand for residential real estate remained steady, although sales were constrained by low inventories. Construction for both residential and commercial units was slightly lower on balance.

• Agricultural conditions were mixed geographically but softened slightly on balance, with some contacts expecting further softening for the remainder of 2023. Energy activity decreased. Overall economic expectations for the coming months generally continued to call for slow growth.

• Employment increased modestly during the reporting period, with most Districts experiencing some job growth. Labor demand remained healthy, though some contacts reported that hiring was getting more targeted and selective. Employers continued to have difficulty finding workers, particularly in health care, transportation, and hospitality, and for highly-skilled positions in general. Many Districts reported that labor availability had improved and that some employers were having an easier time hiring. Employers also reported that the unusually high turnover rates in recent years appear to be returning to pre-pandemic norms. Wages continued to rise, but at a more moderate rate. Multiple Districts reported that wage increases were returning to or nearing pre-pandemic levels.

• Prices increased at a modest pace overall, with several Districts noting some slowing in the pace of increase. Consumer prices generally increased, though reports differed in the extent to which firms were able to pass along input costs increases. Contacts in some Districts noted reluctance to raise prices because consumers had grown more sensitive to prices, while others reported that solid demand allowed firms to maintain margins. Input cost pressures remained elevated for services firms but eased notably in the manufacturing sector. Freight rates continued to decrease, along with the prices for many construction inputs. Price expectations were generally stable or lower over the next several months.

Reports by the Federal Reserve’s Sixth District, Atlanta (which includes Trustmark’s Alabama, Florida and Mississippi market regions), Eighth District, St. Louis (which includes Trustmark’s Tennessee market region), and Eleventh District, Dallas (which includes Trustmark’s Texas market region), noted similar findings for the reporting period as those discussed above. The Federal Reserve’s Sixth District also noted on balance, growth slowed at financial institutions, led by a slight decline in the deposit base in recent months as interest rate increases continued to encourage customers to move deposits into higher-yielding alternatives. The Federal Reserve's Sixth District also noted that institutions steadily increased interest rates on deposits to help offset slowing deposit growth and institutions reported continued loan growth, primarily residential, construction and development, which was offset by a decline in securities portfolios. The Federal Reserve’s Eighth District also reported that banking conditions remained stable, even as lending activity softened, noting small business lending in particular had been slow due to higher interest rates. The Federal Reserve’s Eighth District also noted that deposit growth had seen a strong increase as rising deposit interest rates continued to create a very competitive market for deposits, which is compressing net interest margins. The Federal Reserve’s Eleventh District also reported loan demand continued to decline, with most bankers expecting further deterioration over the next six months, loan volumes fell, driven largely by a sharp contraction in consumer loans, loan performance worsened, credit standards and terms continued to tighten and increases in loan pricing was noted. Banking outlooks continued to deteriorate in the Federal Reserve’s Eleventh District, with contacts expecting a further contraction in business activity and an increase in nonperforming loans over the next six months.

The rapid rise in interest rates during 2022 and the first six months of 2023, the resulting industry-wide reduction in the fair value of securities portfolios and the recent bank runs that led to the failures of some financial institutions in March 2023, among other events, have resulted in a current state of volatility and uncertainty with respect to the health of the United States banking system. There is heightened awareness around liquidity, uninsured deposits, deposit composition, unrecognized investment losses and capital. See further discussion of these items in the remaining sections of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of this document.

Financial Highlights

Trustmark reported net income of $45.0 million, or basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.74, in the second quarter of 2023, compared to $34.3 million, or basic and diluted EPS of $0.56, in the second quarter of 2022. Trustmark’s reported performance during the quarter ended June 30, 2023 produced a return on average tangible equity of 15.18%, a return on average assets of 0.96%, an average equity to average assets ratio of 8.42% and a dividend payout ratio of 31.08%, compared to a return on average tangible equity of 11.36%, a return on average assets of 0.79%, an average equity to average assets ratio of 9.24% and a dividend payout ratio of 41.07% during the quarter ended June 30, 2022.

Total revenue, which is defined as net interest income plus noninterest income, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 was $193.5 million and $382.4 million, respectively, an increase of $27.5 million, or 16.6%, and $63.0 million, or 19.7%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022. The increase in total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, primarily resulted from an increase in net interest income, principally due to increases in interest and fees on loans held for sale (LHFS) and LHFI, interest on securities and other interest income, partially offset by an increase in total interest expense.

Net interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $139.9 million and $277.5 million, respectively, an increase of $27.2 million, or 24.2%, and $65.5 million, or 30.9%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022. Interest income totaled $218.5 million and $417.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, an increase of $101.3 million, or 86.5%, and $196.5 million, or 89.0%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, principally due to increases in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI primarily due to loan growth and rising interest rates, other interest income primarily due to an increase in the rate paid by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (FRBA) on reserves and interest on securities primarily due to coupon resets on floating rate securities and lower mortgage prepayments. Interest expense totaled $78.6 million and $139.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, an increase of $74.1 million and $131.1 million, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022. The increase in interest expense when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time periods in 2022 was due to an increase in interest on deposits primarily due to rising interest rates, increased competition for deposits and higher average balances, an increase in other interest expense primarily due to the increase in short-term Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and an increase in interest on federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements primarily due to increases to the target rate for federal funds purchased by the FRB as well as an increase in upstream federal funds purchased.

Noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $53.6 million, an increase of $300 thousand, or 0.6%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, primarily due to increases in other income, net and insurance commissions, which were largely offset by declines in mortgage banking, net and bank card and other fees. Other income, net totaled $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023, an increase of $1.8 million, or 93.8%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in cash management fees and other miscellaneous income. Insurance commissions totaled $14.8 million for the second quarter of 2023, an increase of $1.1 million, or 7.8%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in commercial property and casualty commissions. Mortgage banking, net totaled $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023, a decrease of $1.5 million, or 19.0%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to declines in the gain on sales of loans, net, partially offset by a decline in the run-off of the mortgage servicing rights (MSR). Bank card and other fees for the three months ended June 30, 2023, totaled $8.9 million, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 12.3%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to declines in customer derivatives income and debit card rebates.

Noninterest income for the first six months of 2023 totaled $104.9 million, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 2.3%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to declines in mortgage banking, net and bank card and other fees, partially offset by increases in service charges on deposit accounts, insurance commissions and other income, net. Mortgage banking, net totaled $14.2 million for the first six months of 2023, a decrease of $3.8 million, or 21.0%, when compared to the first six months of 2022, principally due to declines in the gain on sales of loans, net and the net hedge ineffectiveness, partially offset by a decline in the run-off of the MSR. Bank card and other fees totaled $16.7 million for the first six months of 2023, a decline of $1.9 million, or 10.2%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to a decline in customer derivatives income. Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $21.0 million for the first six months of 2023, an increase of $1.4 million, or 6.9%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to an increase in service charges on personal interest checking accounts. Insurance commissions totaled $29.1 million for the first six months of 2023, an increase of $1.3 million, or 4.6%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to growth in commercial property and casualty commissions. Other income, net totaled $6.2 million for the first six months of 2023, an increase of $1.1 million, or 21.4%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to an increase in cash management service charges partially offset by an increase in the amortization of tax credit partnerships.

Noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $132.2 million, an increase of $8.5 million, or 6.8%, when compared to the same time period in 2022. The increase in noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2023 was principally due to increases in salaries and employee benefits, services and fees and other expense. Salaries and employee benefits totaled $75.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023, an increase of $4.3 million, or 5.9%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in salaries expense, primarily due to general merit increases as well as employees added related to the new Georgia LPO, accrued management performance incentives and commission expense due to improvements in insurance production, partially offset by a decline in commission expense due to the decline in mortgage originations. Services and fees totaled $28.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023, an increase of $2.6 million, or 10.2%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in other services and fees, business processing outsourcing fees, advertising expense and data process charges related to software. Other expense totaled $14.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023, an increase of $1.0 million, or 7.5%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to an increase in FDIC assessment expense, primarily due to an increase in the assessment rate, and other miscellaneous expenses.

Noninterest expense for the first six months of 2023 totaled $260.5 million, an increase of $15.3 million, or 6.2%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in salaries and employee benefits, services and fees, and other expense. Salaries and employee benefits totaled $150.0 million for the first six months of 2023, an increase of $8.7 million, or 6.2%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in salaries expense, primarily due to general merit increases as well as employees added related to the new Georgia LPO, accrued management performance incentives and commission expense due to improvements in insurance production, partially offset by a decline in commission expense due to the decline in mortgage originations. Services and fees totaled $53.7 million for the first six months of 2023, an increase of $2.7 million, or 5.3%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in business processing outsourcing fees, advertising expense and data process charges related to software, partially offset by declines in other services and fees and legal expense. Other expense for the first six months of 2023 totaled $29.3 million, an increase of $2.3 million, or 8.7%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in FDIC assessment expense, primarily due to an increase in the assessment rate, and other miscellaneous expenses.

Trustmark’s provision for credit losses (PCL) on LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $8.2 million and $11.5 million, respectively, an increase of $5.5 million and $9.6 million, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022. The PCL on LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of loan growth and weakening in the macroeconomic forecasts, which also increased reserves related to certain qualitative reserve factors, and extended maturities on mortgage loans resulting from lower prepayment speeds. The PCL on off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $245 thousand and a negative $2.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, an increase in provision expense of $1.8 million and $677 thousand, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022. The PCL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the three months ended June 30, 2023, primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of

changes in the total reserve rate partially offset by a decrease in required reserves due to a decline in unfunded commitments. The negative PCL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the first six months of 2023 primarily reflected a decline in required reserves as a result of a decline in unfunded commitments. Please see the section captioned “Provision for Credit Losses” for additional information regarding the PCL on LHFI and off-balance sheet credit exposures.

At June 30, 2023, nonperforming assets totaled $76.2 million, an increase of $8.2 million, or 12.1%, compared to December 31, 2022, primarily as a result of an increase in nonaccrual loans. Nonaccrual LHFI totaled $75.0 million at June 30, 2023, an increase of $9.1 million, or 13.7%, relative to December 31, 2022, primarily due to loans placed on nonaccrual status in the Mississippi market region partially offset by pay-downs of nonaccrual LHFI in the Texas, Mississippi and Alabama market regions.

LHFI totaled $12.614 billion at June 30, 2023, an increase of $409.9 million, or 3.4%, compared to December 31, 2022. The increase in LHFI during the first six months of 2023 was primarily due to net growth in LHFI secured by real estate and commercial and industrial LHFI, partially offset by a decline in state and other political subdivision LHFI. For additional information regarding changes in LHFI and comparative balances by loan category, see the section captioned “LHFI.”

Management has continued its practice of maintaining excess funding capacity to provide Trustmark with adequate liquidity for its ongoing operations. In this regard, Trustmark benefits from its strong deposit base, its investment portfolio and its access to funding from a variety of external funding sources such as upstream federal funds lines, FHLB advances and brokered deposits. See the section captioned “Capital Resources and Liquidity” for further discussion of the components of Trustmark’s excess funding capacity.

Total deposits were $14.914 billion at June 30, 2023, an increase of $476.3 million, or 3.3%, compared to December 31, 2022. During the first six months of 2023, noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $632.7 million, or 15.5%, reflecting declines in all categories of noninterest-bearing deposits reflecting customers' desire for higher-yielding deposit accounts. Interest-bearing deposits increased $1.109 billion, or 10.7%, during the first six months of 2023, primarily due to growth in certificates of deposits (CDs), which was principally attributable to deposit campaigns offered during the first six months of 2023 and the addition of $598.3 million of brokered CDs, and growth in business interest checking accounts, partially offset by declines in public and consumer interest checking accounts and consumer savings accounts.

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements totaled $311.2 million at June 30, 2023, a decrease of $138.2 million, or 30.7%, compared to December 31, 2022, principally due to a decrease in upstream federal funds purchased. The decrease in the upstream federal funds purchased was principally due to a decrease in the reserve balance at the FRBA. Other borrowings totaled $1.057 billion at June 30, 2023, an increase of $5.8 million, or 0.5%, compared to December 31, 2022, principally due to a slight increase in short-term FHLB advances obtained from the FHLB of Dallas partially offset by a decline in GNMA loans eligible for repurchase.

Recent Legislative and Regulatory Developments

Potential Regulatory Reforms in Response to Recent Bank Failures

The recent failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California, Signature Bank, New York, New York, and First Republic Bank, San Francisco, California, in March and May 2023, may lead to regulatory changes and initiatives that could impact Trustmark. For example, President Biden has encouraged the federal banking agencies to adopt various reforms, including the completion of an incentive compensation rule for bank executives pursuant to Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act, in response to these bank failures. On April 28, 2023, the FRB and the FDIC issued reports on the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, respectively, identifying potential causes that the federal banking agencies may seek to address through changes to their supervisory and regulatory policies. Additionally, agency officials, including the Vice Chair for Supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, have called for changes to the manner in which banks’ capital, interest rate and liquidity risks are supervised and regulated. The extent of final actions to be taken by the federal regulatory agencies in response to these failures, including the potential changes by the Vice Chair or highlighted in the FRB and FDIC reports, remains unclear.

FDIC Special Assessment

On May 11, 2023, the FDIC issued a proposed rule if adopted would impose special assessments to recover the loss to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) incurred in the receiverships of these institutions. Under the proposed rule, the FDIC would collect special assessments at an annual rate of approximately 12.5 basis points, over eight quarterly assessment periods. The assessment base for the special assessments under the proposed rule would be equal to an insured depository institution's estimated uninsured deposits, reported as of December 31, 2022, adjusted to exclude the first $5 billion in estimated uninsured deposits. Under the proposed rule, the FDIC would retain the ability to cease collection early, extend the special assessment collection period one or more quarters beyond the initial eight-quarter collection period to collect the difference between estimated or actual losses and the amounts collected, and impose

a final shortfall special assessment on a one-time basis after the receiverships for Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank terminate. The special assessments as proposed are not expected to be material to Trustmark's financial condition or results of operations.

Small Business Lending Data Collection Rule

On March 30, 2023, the CFPB finalized a rule under section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act requiring lenders to collect and report data regarding small business lending activity. Trustmark is evaluating the impact of the new rule. The rule is scheduled to take effect on August 29, 2023, and requires compliance by October 1, 2024, April 1, 2025, or January 1, 2026, depending on the number of covered small business loans that a covered lender originates. On July 31 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas enjoined the CFPB from implementing and enforcing the rule with respect to American Bankers Association members, which includes Trustmark, pending the U.S. Supreme Court's consideration of the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding structure in a separate case.

Third Party Risk Management Guidance

On June 6, 2023, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve and the OCC issued final guidance providing sound principles that support a risk-based approach to third-party risk management. Trustmark is evaluating the impact of this guidance on its practices.

For additional information regarding legislation and regulation applicable to Trustmark, see the section captioned “Supervision and Regulation” included in Part I. Item 1. – Business of Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Report.

Selected Financial Data

The following tables present financial data derived from Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods presented ($ in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Consolidated Statements of Income
Total interest income	$	218,528		$	117,184		$	417,428		$	220,897
Total interest expense		78,624			4,508			139,929			8,877
Net interest income		139,904			112,676			277,499			212,020
Provision for credit losses (PCL), LHFI		8,211			2,716			11,455			1,856
PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures		245			(1,568	)		(1,997	)		(2,674	)
Noninterest income		53,553			53,253			104,930			107,368
Noninterest expense		132,218			123,767			260,545			245,286
Income before income taxes		52,783			41,014			112,426			74,920
Income taxes		7,746			6,730			17,089			11,425
Net Income	$	45,037		$	34,284		$	95,337		$	63,495
Total Revenue (1)	$	193,457		$	165,929		$	382,429		$	319,388
Per Share Data
Basic EPS	$	0.74		$	0.56		$	1.56		$	1.03
Diluted EPS		0.74			0.56			1.56			1.03
Cash dividends per share		0.23			0.23			0.46			0.46
Performance Ratios
Return on average equity		11.43	%		8.55	%		12.39	%		7.71	%
Return on average tangible equity		15.18	%		11.36	%		16.56	%		10.16	%
Return on average assets		0.96	%		0.79	%		1.03	%		0.73	%
Average equity / average assets		8.42	%		9.24	%		8.33	%		9.51	%
Net interest margin (fully taxable equivalent)		3.33	%		2.90	%		3.36	%		2.74	%
Dividend payout ratio		31.08	%		41.07	%		29.49	%		44.66	%
Credit Quality Ratios (2)
Net charge-offs (recoveries) / average loans		0.04	%		-0.06	%		0.04	%		-0.03	%
PCL, LHFI / average loans		0.26	%		0.10	%		0.18	%		0.03	%
Nonaccrual LHFI / (LHFI + LHFS)		0.59	%		0.56	%
Nonperforming assets / (LHFI + LHFS)<br>   plus other real estate		0.60	%		0.58	%
ACL, LHFI / LHFI		1.03	%		0.94	%

(1)

Consistent with Trustmark’s audited annual financial statements, total revenue is defined as net interest income plus noninterest income.

(2)

Excludes PPP loans.

	June 30,
	2023			2022
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Total assets	$	18,422,626		$	16,951,510
Securities		3,330,548			3,782,118
Total loans (LHFI + LHFS)		12,795,061			11,135,026
Deposits		14,913,900			14,770,168
Total shareholders' equity		1,571,193			1,586,696
Stock Performance
Market value - close	$	21.12		$	29.19
Book value		25.73			25.93
Tangible book value		19.38			19.58
Capital Ratios
Total equity / total assets		8.53	%		9.36	%
Tangible equity / tangible assets		6.56	%		7.23	%
Tangible equity / risk-weighted assets		7.91	%		9.16	%
Tier 1 leverage ratio		8.35	%		8.80	%
Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		9.87	%		11.01	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		10.27	%		11.47	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		12.08	%		13.26	%

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to capital ratios defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and banking regulators, Trustmark utilizes various tangible common equity measures when evaluating capital utilization and adequacy. Tangible common equity, as defined by Trustmark, represents common equity less goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. Trustmark's common equity Tier 1 capital includes common stock, capital surplus and retained earnings, and is reduced by goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated net deferred tax liabilities as well as disallowed deferred tax assets and threshold deductions as applicable.

Trustmark believes these measures are important because they reflect the level of capital available to withstand unexpected market conditions. Additionally, presentation of these measures allows readers to compare certain aspects of Trustmark’s capitalization to other organizations. These ratios differ from capital measures defined by banking regulators principally in that the numerator excludes shareholders’ equity associated with preferred securities, the nature and extent of which varies across organizations. In Management’s experience, many stock analysts use tangible common equity measures in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method in accounting for mergers and acquisitions.

These calculations are intended to complement the capital ratios defined by GAAP and banking regulators. Because GAAP does not include these capital ratio measures, Trustmark believes there are no comparable GAAP financial measures to these tangible common equity ratios. Despite the importance of these measures to Trustmark, there are no standardized definitions for them and, as a result, Trustmark’s calculation methods may not be comparable with those of other organizations. Also, there may be limits in the usefulness of these measures to investors. As a result, Trustmark encourages readers to consider its consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.

The following table reconciles Trustmark’s calculation of these measures to amounts reported under GAAP for the periods presented ($ in thousands, except per share data):

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2023			2022			2023			2022
TANGIBLE EQUITY
AVERAGE BALANCES
Total shareholders' equity		$	1,580,291		$	1,608,309		$	1,552,215		$	1,660,739
Less: Goodwill			(384,237	)		(384,237	)		(384,237	)		(384,237	)
Identifiable intangible assets			(3,301	)		(4,436	)		(3,411	)		(4,656	)
Total average tangible equity		$	1,192,753		$	1,219,636		$	1,164,567		$	1,271,846
PERIOD END BALANCES
Total shareholders' equity		$	1,571,193		$	1,586,696
Less: Goodwill			(384,237	)		(384,237	)
Identifiable intangible assets			(3,222	)		(4,264	)
Total tangible equity	(a)	$	1,183,734		$	1,198,195
TANGIBLE ASSETS
Total assets		$	18,422,626		$	16,951,510
Less: Goodwill			(384,237	)		(384,237	)
Identifiable intangible assets			(3,222	)		(4,264	)
Total tangible assets	(b)	$	18,035,167		$	16,563,009
Risk-weighted assets	(c)	$	14,966,614		$	13,076,981
NET INCOME ADJUSTED FOR INTANGIBLE AMORTIZATION
Net income		$	45,037		$	34,284		$	95,337		$	63,495
Plus: Intangible amortization net of tax			97			246			313			608
Net income adjusted for intangible amortization		$	45,134		$	34,530		$	95,650		$	64,103
Period end shares outstanding	(d)		61,069,036			61,201,123
TANGIBLE EQUITY MEASUREMENTS
Return on average tangible equity (1)			15.18	%		11.36	%		16.56	%		10.16	%
Tangible equity/tangible assets	(a)/(b)		6.56	%		7.23	%
Tangible equity/risk-weighted assets	(a)/(c)		7.91	%		9.16	%
Tangible book value	(a)/(d)*1,000	$	19.38		$	19.58
COMMON EQUITY TIER 1 CAPITAL (CET1)
Total shareholders' equity		$	1,571,193		$	1,586,696
CECL transitional adjustment			13,000			19,500
AOCI-related adjustments			265,704			207,142
CET1 adjustments and deductions:
Goodwill net of associated deferred tax liabilities (DTLs)			(370,227	)		(370,229	)
Other adjustments and deductions for CET1 (2)			(2,915	)		(3,757	)
CET1 capital	(e)		1,476,755			1,439,352
Additional Tier 1 capital instruments plus related surplus			60,000			60,000
Tier 1 Capital		$	1,536,755		$	1,499,352
Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	(e)/(c)		9.87	%		11.01	%

(1)

Calculated using annualized net income adjusted for intangible amortization divided by total average tangible equity.

(2)

Includes other intangible assets, net of DTLs, disallowed deferred tax assets and threshold deductions, as applicable.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the principal component of Trustmark’s income stream and represents the difference, or spread, between interest and fee income generated from earning assets and the interest expense paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Fluctuations in interest rates, as well as volume and mix changes in earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, can materially impact net interest income. The net interest margin is computed by dividing fully taxable equivalent (FTE) net interest income by average interest-earning assets and measures how effectively Trustmark utilizes its interest-earning assets in relationship to the interest cost of funding them. The accompanying yield/rate analysis tables show the average balances for all assets and liabilities of Trustmark and the interest income or expense associated with earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The yields and rates have been computed based upon interest income and expense adjusted to a FTE basis using the federal statutory corporate tax rate in effect for each of the periods shown. Loans on nonaccrual have been included in the average loan balances, and interest collected prior to these loans having been placed on nonaccrual has been included in interest income. Loan fees included in interest associated with the average LHFS and LHFI balances were immaterial.

Net interest income-FTE for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased $27.7 million, or 24.0%, and $66.4 million, or 30.5%, respectively, when compared with the same time periods in 2022. The increase in net interest income-FTE when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time periods in 2022 was principally due to increases in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI, other interest income and taxable interest on securities, partially offset by increases in all categories of interest expense. The net interest margin-FTE for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased 43 basis points to 3.33% and 62 basis points to 3.36%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022. The net interest margin excluding PPP loans and the balance held at the FRBA, which equals the reported net interest income-FTE excluding interest and fees on PPP and interest on the FRBA balance, as a percentage of average earning assets excluding average PPP loans and the FRBA balance, was 3.23% and 3.30% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, an increase of 17 basis points and 33 basis points, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022. The increase in the net interest margin excluding PPP loans and the balance held at the FRBA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the same time periods in 2022, was principally due to increases in the yields on the LHFS and LHFI portfolio and the securities portfolio, partially offset by increases in the costs of interest-bearing liabilities.

At June 30, 2023, Trustmark had no PPP loans outstanding compared to $12.5 million, net of $259 thousand of deferred fees and costs, outstanding at June 30, 2022. Processing fees earned by TNB as the originating lender were amortized over the life of the loans. Payments on PPP loans were deferred until the date the SBA remitted the borrower’s loan forgiveness amount to the lender (or, if the borrower did not apply for loan forgiveness, ten months after the end of the borrower’s loan forgiveness covered period). During the first six months of 2022, PPP loans originated by Trustmark totaling $21.0 million were forgiven by the SBA. Average PPP loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 totaled $17.7 million and $23.3 million, respectively. Interest and fees on PPP loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 totaled $184 thousand and $352 thousand, respectively, resulting in yield on PPP loans of 4.16% and 3.04%, respectively.

The average FRBA balance, included in other earning assets, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $777.0 million and $666.9 million, respectively, a decrease of $300.5 million, or 27.9%, and $748.9 million, or 52.9%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, principally due to the deployment of excess cash and the significant growth in the LHFI portfolio during 2022. Interest earned on FRBA balances increased $8.7 million and $13.9 million, respectively, when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time periods in 2022. The yield on the FRBA balance was 5.47% and 4.99% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, compared to 0.71% and 0.37% for the same time periods in 2022, respectively, reflecting increases in the interest rate that the FRBA pays on reserves.

Average interest-earning assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 were $17.248 billion and $17.058 billion, respectively, compared to $15.984 billion and $16.022 billion for the same time periods in 2022, respectively, an increase of $1.264 billion, or 7.9%, and $1.036 billion, or 6.5%, respectively, principally due to increases in average loans (LHFS and LHFI), partially offset by declines in average other earning assets and average securities. Average loans (LHFS and LHFI) increased $1.822 billion, or 16.7%, and $1.900 billion, or 17.7%, when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time period in 2022, respectively, reflecting an increase in the average balance of the LHFI portfolio of $1.858 billion, or 17.4%, and $1.970 billion, or 18.8%, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in the average balance of the LHFS portfolio of $35.8 million, or 17.4%, and $69.3 million, or 30.9%, respectively. The increase in the LHFI portfolio when the balance at June 30, 2023 is compared to June 30, 2022 was principally due to net growth in LHFI secured by real estate and commercial and industrial LHFI, partially offset by a decrease in other commercial LHFI. The decrease in the LHFS portfolio when the balance at June 30, 2023 is compared to June 30, 2022 was principally due to a decline in the GNMA loans eligible for repurchase. Average other earning assets decreased $236.3 million, or 20.7%, and $693.0 million, or 47.0%, when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time periods in 2022, respectively, primarily due to the decrease in reserves held at the FRBA. Average securities declined $306.6 million, or 7.8%, and $150.7 million, or 4.0%, when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time periods in 2022, respectively, principally due to calls, maturities and pay-downs of the loans underlying GSE guaranteed securities.

Interest income-FTE for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $221.9 million and $424.3 million, respectively, an increase of $101.8 million, or 84.8%, and $197.5 million, or 87.1%, respectively, while the yield on total earning assets increased to 5.16% and 5.02%, respectively, compared to 3.01% and 2.85% for the same time periods in 2022, respectively. Interest income-FTE, excluding PPP loans and the balance held at the FRBA, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased $93.3 million, or 79.1%, and $183.9 million, or 82.2%, respectively, while the yield on total earning assets excluding PPP loans and the balance held at the FRBA increased to 5.15% and 5.02%, respectively, compared 3.18% and 3.10% for the same time periods in 2022, respectively. The increase in interest income-FTE, excluding PPP loans and the balance held at the FRBA, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 was primarily due to increases in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI-FTE and interest on securities-taxable. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI-FTE increased $89.9 million, or 87.3%, and $175.6 million, or 89.5%, respectively, while the yield on LHFS and LHFI increased 229 basis points to 6.08% and 225 basis points to 5.94%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, primarily due to the higher interest rate environment as well as the increase in the average balance of LHFI. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, interest on securities-taxable increased $2.2 million, or 15.2%, and $6.6 million, or 24.6%, respectively, while the yield on securities-taxable increased 37 basis points to 1.87%

and 42 basis points to 1.86%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, primarily due to coupon resets on floating rate securities and lower mortgage prepayments.

Average interest-bearing liabilities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $13.047 billion and $12.817 billion, respectively, compared to $10.760 billion and $10.830 billion for the same time periods in 2022, respectively, an increase of $2.287 billion, or 21.2%, and $1.987 billion, or 18.3%, respectively. The increase in average interest-bearing liabilities when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time periods in 2022 was primarily the result of the increases in average other borrowings, average interest-bearing deposits and average federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements. Average other borrowings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased $1.250 billion and $1.135 billion, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, principally due to the increase in outstanding short-term FHLB advances with the FHLB of Dallas. Average interest-bearing deposits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased $765.5 million, or 7.4%, and $603.0 million, or 5.8%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, primarily reflecting growth in average time deposits and average interest-bearing demand deposits. Average federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased $271.1 million and $247.9 million, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, principally due to an increase in upstream federal funds purchased.

Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $78.6 million and $139.9 million, respectively, an increase of $74.1 million and $131.1 million, respectively, when compared with the same time periods in 2022, while the rate on total interest-bearing liabilities increased 225 basis points to 2.42% and 203 basis points to 2.20%, respectively, reflecting increases in all categories of interest expense. Interest on deposits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased $51.6 million and $89.8 million, respectively, while the rate on interest-bearing deposits increased 185 basis points to 1.96% and 164 basis points to 1.75%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022, primarily due to higher interest rates, reflecting the increased competitive pressures on deposits, and increases in average balances of time deposits and interest checking accounts. Other interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased $17.7 million and $31.7 million, respectively, while the rate on other borrowings increased to 5.12% and 5.01%, respectively, compared to 2.52% and 2.39% for the same time periods in 2022, respectively, primarily due to the increase in outstanding short-term FHLB advances with the FHLB of Dallas. Interest on federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 increased $4.8 million and $9.6 million, respectively, while the rate on federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements increased to 5.01% and 4.73%, respectively, when compared to 0.24% and 0.17% for the same time periods in 2022, respectively, reflecting the FRB's increases to the target rate for federal funds purchased as well as the increase in upstream federal funds purchased.

The following tables provide the tax equivalent basis yield or rate for each component of the tax equivalent net interest margin for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2023								2022
	Average<br>Balance			Interest		Yield/<br>Rate			Average<br>Balance			Interest		Yield/<br>Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold and securities<br>   purchased under reverse repurchase<br>   agreements	$	3,275		$	45		5.51	%	$	110		$	1		3.65	%
Securities - taxable		3,603,591			16,779		1.87	%		3,905,963			14,561		1.50	%
Securities - nontaxable		6,514			69		4.25	%		10,740			107		4.00	%
PPP Loans		—			—		—			17,746			184		4.16	%
Loans (LHFS and LHFI)		12,732,057			192,941		6.08	%		10,910,178			103,033		3.79	%
Other earning assets		903,027			12,077		5.36	%		1,139,312			2,214		0.78	%
Total interest-earning assets		17,248,464			221,911		5.16	%		15,984,049			120,100		3.01	%
Other assets		1,648,583								1,513,127
ACL, LHFI		(121,960	)							(99,106	)
Total Assets	$	18,775,087							$	17,398,070
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	11,141,623			54,409		1.96	%	$	10,376,149			2,774		0.11	%
Federal funds purchased and<br>   securities sold under repurchase<br>   agreements		389,834			4,865		5.01	%		118,753			70		0.24	%
Other borrowings		1,515,203			19,350		5.12	%		265,255			1,664		2.52	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		13,046,660			78,624		2.42	%		10,760,157			4,508		0.17	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		3,595,927								4,590,338
Other liabilities		552,209								439,266
Shareholders' equity		1,580,291								1,608,309
Total Liabilities and<br>   Shareholders' Equity	$	18,775,087							$	17,398,070
Net Interest Margin					143,287		3.33	%					115,592		2.90	%
Less tax equivalent adjustment					3,383								2,916
Net Interest Margin per<br>   Consolidated Statements<br>   of Income				$	139,904							$	112,676
	Six Months Ended June 30,
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	2023								2022
	Average<br>Balance			Interest		Yield/<br>Rate			Average<br>Balance			Interest		Yield/<br>Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold and securities<br>   purchased under reverse repurchase<br>   agreements	$	2,829		$	75		5.35	%	$	83		$	1		2.43	%
Securities - taxable		3,634,824			33,540		1.86	%		3,781,847			26,918		1.44	%
Securities - nontaxable		7,910			161		4.10	%		11,592			229		3.98	%
PPP Loans		—			—		—			23,346			352		3.04	%
Loans (LHFS and LHFI)		12,631,810			371,908		5.94	%		10,731,438			196,285		3.69	%
Other earning assets		780,657			18,604		4.81	%		1,473,655			3,031		0.41	%
Total interest-earning assets		17,058,030			424,288		5.02	%		16,021,961			226,816		2.85	%
Other assets		1,700,643								1,531,884
ACL, LHFI		(120,974	)							(99,247	)
Total Assets	$	18,637,699							$	17,454,598
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	10,997,795			95,307		1.75	%	$	10,394,769			5,534		0.11	%
Federal funds purchased and<br>   securities sold under repurchase<br>   agreements		413,055			9,697		4.73	%		165,122			140		0.17	%
Other borrowings		1,406,197			34,925		5.01	%		270,602			3,203		2.39	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		12,817,047			139,929		2.20	%		10,830,493			8,877		0.17	%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		3,703,987								4,595,693
Other liabilities		564,450								367,673
Shareholders' equity		1,552,215								1,660,739
Total Liabilities and<br>   Shareholders' Equity	$	18,637,699							$	17,454,598
Net Interest Margin					284,359		3.36	%					217,939		2.74	%
Less tax equivalent adjustment					6,860								5,919
Net Interest Margin per<br>   Consolidated Statements<br>   of Income				$	277,499							$	212,020

Provision for Credit Losses

The PCL, LHFI is the amount necessary to maintain the ACL for LHFI at the amount of expected credit losses inherent within the LHFI portfolio. The amount of PCL and the related ACL for LHFI are based on Trustmark’s ACL methodology. The PCL, LHFI totaled $8.2 million and $11.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, compared to $2.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the same time periods in 2022. The PCL on LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of loan growth and weakening in the macroeconomic forecasts, which also increased reserves related to certain qualitative reserve factors, and extended maturities on mortgage loans resulting from lower prepayment speeds.

FASB ASC Topic 326 requires Trustmark to estimate expected credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures which are not unconditionally cancellable by Trustmark. Trustmark maintains a separate ACL for off-balance sheet credit exposures, including unfunded commitments and letters of credit. Adjustments to the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures are recorded to the PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures. The PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $245 thousand and a negative $2.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, compared to a negative $1.6 million and a negative $2.7 million, respectively, for the same time periods in 2022. The PCL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the three months ended June 30, 2023, primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of changes in the total reserve rate partially offset by a decrease in required reserves due to a decline in unfunded commitments. The negative PCL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the first six months of 2023 primarily reflected a decline in required reserves as a result of a decline in unfunded commitments.

See the section captioned “Allowance for Credit Losses” for information regarding Trustmark’s ACL methodology as well as further analysis of the PCL.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income represented 27.7% and 27.4% of total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, compared to 32.1% and 33.6% or the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, respectively. The following table provides the comparative components of noninterest income for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022		Change		% Change			2023		2022		Change		% Change
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	10,695	$	10,226				4.6	%	$	21,031	$	19,677				6.9	%
Bank card and other fees		8,917		10,167		)		-12.3	%		16,720		18,609		)		-10.2	%
Mortgage banking, net		6,600		8,149		)		-19.0	%		14,239		18,022		)		-21.0	%
Insurance commissions		14,764		13,702				7.8	%		29,069		27,791				4.6	%
Wealth management		8,882		9,102		)		-2.4	%		17,662		18,156		)		-2.7	%
Other, net		3,695		1,907				93.8	%		6,209		5,113				21.4	%
Total noninterest income	$	53,553	$	53,253				0.6	%	$	104,930	$	107,368		)		-2.3	%

All values are in US Dollars.

Changes in various components of noninterest income are discussed in further detail below. For analysis of Trustmark’s insurance commissions and wealth management income, please see the section captioned “Results of Segment Operations.”

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts

The increase in service charges on deposit accounts when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to an increase in service charges on personal interest checking accounts.

Bank Card and Other Fees

The decrease in bank card and other fees when the three months ended June 30, 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to declines in customer derivatives income and debit card rebates. The decrease in bank card and other fees when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to a decline in customer derivatives income.

Mortgage Banking, Net

The following table illustrates the components of mortgage banking, net included in noninterest income for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,											Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			Change		% Change			2023			2022			Change		% Change
Mortgage servicing income, net	$	6,764		$	6,557					3.2	%	$	13,549		$	12,986					4.3	%
Change in fair value-MSR from<br>   runoff		(2,710	)		(3,806	)				28.8	%		(3,855	)		(7,591	)				49.2	%
Gain on sales of loans, net		3,887			6,030			)		-35.5	%		7,684			12,253			)		-37.3	%
Mortgage banking income<br>   before net hedge<br>   ineffectiveness		7,941			8,781			)		-9.6	%		17,378			17,648			)		-1.5	%
Change in fair value-MSR from<br>   market changes		5,898			8,739			)		-32.5	%		1,926			30,759			)		-93.7	%
Change in fair value of<br>   derivatives		(7,239	)		(9,371	)				22.8	%		(5,065	)		(30,385	)				83.3	%
Net hedge ineffectiveness		(1,341	)		(632	)		)	n/m				(3,139	)		374			)	n/m
Mortgage banking, net	$	6,600		$	8,149			)		-19.0	%	$	14,239		$	18,022			)		-21.0	%

All values are in US Dollars.

n/m - percentage changes greater than +/- 100% are not considered meaningful

The decrease in mortgage banking, net for the three months ended June 30, 2023 when compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to decline in the gain on sales of loans, net, partially offset by a decline in the run-off of the MSR. The decrease in mortgage banking, net when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to declines in the gain on sales of loans, net and the net hedge ineffectiveness, partially offset by a decline in the run-off of the MSR. Mortgage loan production for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 was $431.3 million and $792.4 million, respectively, a decrease of $250.1 million, or 36.7%, and $433.3 million, or 35.4%, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2022. Loans serviced for others totaled $8.260 billion at June 30, 2023, compared with $8.022 billion at June 30, 2022, an increase of $238.2 million, or 3.0%.

Representing a significant component of mortgage banking income is the gain on sales of loans, net. The decrease in the gain on sales of loans, net when the three months ended June 30, 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, was primarily the result of lower profit margins in secondary marketing activities partially offset by an increase in the mortgage fair value adjustment. The decrease in the gain on sales of loans, net when the six months ended June 30, 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, was primarily the result of a decline in the volume of loans sold and lower profit margins in secondary marketing activities, partially offset by an increase in the mortgage fair value adjustment. Loan sales totaled $335.5 million and $549.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 0.6%, and $161.8 million, or 22.8%, respectively, when compared with the same time periods in 2022.

Other Income, Net

The following table illustrates the components of other income, net included in noninterest income for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,											Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			Change		% Change			2023			2022			Change		% Change
Partnership amortization for<br>   tax credit purposes	$	(2,019	)	$	(1,475	)		)		-36.9	%	$	(3,980	)	$	(2,811	)		)		-41.6	%
Increase in life insurance cash<br>   surrender value		1,716			1,683					2.0	%		3,409			3,310					3.0	%
Other miscellaneous income		3,998			1,699				n/m				6,780			4,614					46.9	%
Total other, net	$	3,695		$	1,907					93.8	%	$	6,209		$	5,113					21.4	%

All values are in US Dollars.

n/m - percentage changes greater than +/- 100% are not considered meaningful

The increase in other income, net for the three months ended June 30, 2023, when compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to increases in cash management fees and other miscellaneous income. The increase in other income, net for the first six months of 2023, when compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to an increase in cash management service charges partially offset by an increase in the amortization of tax credit partnerships.

Noninterest Expense

The following table illustrates the comparative components of noninterest expense for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022		Change	% Change			2023		2022		Change	% Change
Salaries and employee benefits	$	75,940	$	71,679			5.9	%	$	149,996	$	141,264			6.2	%
Services and fees (1)		28,264		25,659			10.2	%		53,690		50,973			5.3	%
Net occupancy-premises		7,108		6,892			3.1	%		14,737		13,971			5.5	%
Equipment expense		6,404		6,047			5.9	%		12,809		12,108			5.8	%
Other expense (1)		14,502		13,490			7.5	%		29,313		26,970			8.7	%
Total noninterest expense	$	132,218	$	123,767			6.8	%	$	260,545	$	245,286			6.2	%

All values are in US Dollars.

(1)

During the first quarter of 2023, Trustmark reclassified its debit card transaction fees from other expense to services and fees. The prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

Changes in the various components of noninterest expense are discussed in further detail below. Management considers disciplined expense management a key area of focus in the support of improving shareholder value.

Salaries and Employee Benefits

The increase in salaries and employee benefits when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 is compared to the same time periods in 2022 was principally due to increases in salaries expense, primarily due to general merit increases as well as employees added related

to the new Georgia LPO, accrued management performance incentives and commission expense due to improvements in insurance production, partially offset by a decline in commission expense due to the decline in mortgage originations.

Services and Fees

The increase in services and fees for the three months ended June 30, 2023 was principally due to increases in other services and fees, business processing outsourcing fees, advertising expense and data process charges related to software. The increase in services and fees for the first six months of 2023 was principally due to increases in business processing outsourcing fees, advertising expense and data processing charges related to software, partially offset by declines in other services and fees and legal expense.

Other Expense

The following table illustrates the comparative components of other noninterest expense for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022		Change		% Change			2023		2022		Change		% Change
Loan expense (1)	$	3,066	$	2,947				4.0	%	$	5,604	$	6,475		)		-13.5	%
Amortization of intangibles		130		328		)		-60.4	%		418		810		)		-48.4	%
FDIC assessment expense		2,550		1,810				40.9	%		4,920		3,310				48.6	%
Other real estate expense, net		171		623		)		-72.6	%		343		658		)		-47.9	%
Other miscellaneous expense		8,585		7,782				10.3	%		18,028		15,717				14.7	%
Total other expense (1)	$	14,502	$	13,490				7.5	%	$	29,313	$	26,970				8.7	%

All values are in US Dollars.

(1)

During the first quarter of 2023, Trustmark reclassified its debit card transaction fees from other expense to services and fees. The prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

The increase in other expense when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time periods in 2022 was principally due to increases in FDIC assessment expense and other miscellaneous expenses. The increase in FDIC assessment expense when the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are compared to the same time periods in 2022 was principally due to changes in the assessment rate calculation, deployment of Trustmark's excess cash balance during 2022, which increased the overall assessment rate, and the 2 basis point increase in the initial base assessment rate by the FDIC during the second quarter of 2023 as part of the FDIC's final rule to restore the DIF to required levels. The increase in other miscellaneous expenses when the three months ended June 30, 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to increases in sponsorships and contributions, travel and entertainment expense and other various miscellaneous expenses partially offset by a decline in stationery and supplies expenses. The increase in other miscellaneous expenses when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to increases in sponsorships and contributions, travel and entertainment expense, stationery and supplies expenses, insurance expense and other various miscellaneous expenses.

Results of Segment Operations

For a description of the methodologies used to measure financial performance and financial information by reportable segment, please see Note 18 – Segment Information included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report. The following discusses changes in the results of operations of each reportable segment for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.

General Banking

Net interest income for the General Banking Segment increased $65.2 million, or 31.1%, when the six months ended June 30, 2023 is compared with the same time period in 2022. The increase in net interest income was principally due to increases in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI, other interest income and interest on securities, partially offset by increases in all categories of interest expense. The PCL (LHFI and off-balance sheet credit exposures) for the General Banking Segment for the six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $9.4 million compared to a negative PCL of $810 thousand for the same period in 2022, an increase of $10.2 million. For more information on these net interest income and PCL items, please see the sections captioned “Financial Highlights” and “Results of Operations.”

Noninterest income for the General Banking Segment decreased $4.1 million, or 6.7%, when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, primarily due to the declines in mortgage banking, net and bank card and other fees partially offset by an increase in service charges on deposit accounts. Noninterest income for the General Banking Segment represented 17.3% of total revenue for this segment for the first six months of 2023 compared to 22.7% for the same time period in 2022. Noninterest income for the General Banking Segment includes service charges on deposit accounts; bank card and other fees; mortgage banking, net and other

income, net. For more information on these noninterest income items, please see the analysis included in the section captioned “Noninterest Income.”

Noninterest expense for the General Banking Segment increased $13.6 million, or 6.5%, when the first six months of 2023 is compared with the same time period in 2022, principally due to increases in salaries and employee benefits, data processing charges related to software, FDIC assessment expense and other miscellaneous expense, partially offset by declines in loan expenses and other services and fees. For more information on these noninterest expense items, please see the analysis included in the section captioned “Noninterest Expense.”

Wealth Management

Net income for the Wealth Management Segment for the first six months of 2023 increased $46 thousand, or 1.4%, when compared to the same time period in 2022, primarily due to an increase in net interest income and a decline in noninterest expense, partially offset by a decrease in noninterest income. Net interest income for the Wealth Management Segment increased $286 thousand, or 10.7%, when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to an increase in interest and fees on loans generated by the Private Banking Department partially offset by an increase in interest expense on deposits. The PCL for the six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled $89 thousand compared to a negative PCL of $8 thousand for the same period in 2022. Noninterest income for the Wealth Management Segment, which primarily includes income related to investment management, trust and brokerage services, decreased $545 thousand, or 3.0%, when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, primarily due to declines in income from brokerage services partially offset by an increase in income from annuity investment services. Noninterest expense for the Wealth Management Segment decreased $418 thousand, or 2.5%, when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, principally due to a decrease in salary and employee benefit expense, primarily related to broker commissions and trust incentives.

At June 30, 2023 and 2022, Trustmark held assets under management and administration of $18.203 billion and $17.323 billion, respectively, and brokerage assets of $2.442 billion and $2.172 billion, respectively.

Insurance

Net income for the Insurance Segment for the first six months of 2023 increased $110 thousand, or 1.7%, when compared to the same time period in 2022. Noninterest income for the Insurance Segment, which is predominately composed of insurance commissions, increased $2.2 million, or 8.0%, when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, primarily due to new business commission volume in the commercial property and casualty business. Noninterest expense for the Insurance Segment increased $2.1 million, or 10.8%, when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, primarily due to increases in salary expense as a result of general merit increases and commission expense as a result of higher business volumes.

Income Taxes

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, Trustmark’s combined effective tax rate was 14.7% and 15.2%, respectively, compared to 16.4% and 15.2%, respectively, for the same time periods in 2022. Trustmark’s effective tax rate continues to be less than the statutory rate primarily due to various tax-exempt income items and its utilization of income tax credit programs. Trustmark invests in partnerships that provide income tax credits on a Federal and/or State basis (i.e., new market tax credits, low-income housing tax credits or historical tax credits). The income tax credits related to these partnerships are utilized as specifically allowed by income tax law and are recorded as a reduction in income tax expense.

Financial Condition

Earning assets serve as the primary revenue streams for Trustmark and are comprised of securities, loans, federal funds sold, securities sold under reverse repurchase agreements and other earning assets. Average earning assets totaled $17.058 billion, or 91.5% of total average assets, for the six months ended June 30, 2023, compared to $16.022 billion, or 91.8% of total average assets, for the six months ended June 30, 2022, an increase of $1.036 billion, or 6.5%.

Securities

The securities portfolio is utilized by Management to manage interest rate risk, generate interest income, provide liquidity and use as collateral for public deposits and wholesale funding. Risk and return can be adjusted by altering duration, composition and/or balance of the portfolio. The weighted-average life of the portfolio was 4.7 years at June 30, 2023 compared to 4.9 years at December 31, 2022.

When compared to December 31, 2022, total investment securities decreased by $188.0 million, or 5.3%, during the first six months of 2023. This decrease resulted primarily from calls, maturities and pay-downs of the loans underlying GSE guaranteed securities. Trustmark sold no securities during the first six months of 2023 or 2022.

During 2022, Trustmark reclassified approximately $766.0 million of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity to mitigate the potential adverse impact of a rising interest rate environment on the fair value of the available for sale securities and the related impact on tangible common equity. At the date of these transfers, the net unrealized holding loss on the available for sale securities totaled approximately $91.9 million ($68.9 million net of tax). The resulting net unrealized holding losses are being amortized over the remaining life of the securities as a yield adjustment in a manner consistent with the amortization or accretion of the original purchase premium or discount on the associated security.

At June 30, 2023, the net unamortized, unrealized loss on all transferred securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, (AOCI) in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets totaled $63.4 million, net of tax, compared to $69.2 million, net of tax, at December 31, 2022.

Available for sale securities are carried at their estimated fair value with unrealized gains or losses recognized, net of taxes, in AOCI, a separate component of shareholders’ equity. At June 30, 2023, available for sale securities totaled $1.872 billion, which represented 56.2% of the securities portfolio, compared to $2.024 billion, or 57.5% of total securities, at December 31, 2022. At June 30, 2023, unrealized losses, net on available for sale securities totaled $235.7 million compared to unrealized losses, net of $246.6 million at December 31, 2022. At June 30, 2023, available for sale securities consisted of U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, GSE guaranteed mortgage-related securities and direct obligations of government agencies and GSEs.

Held to maturity securities are carried at amortized cost and represent those securities that Trustmark both intends and has the ability to hold to maturity. At June 30, 2023, held to maturity securities totaled $1.459 billion, which represented 43.8% of the total securities portfolio, compared to $1.495 billion, or 42.5% of total securities, at December 31, 2022.

Management continues to focus on asset quality as one of the strategic goals of the securities portfolio, which is evidenced by the investment of 99.8% of the portfolio in GSE-backed obligations and other Aaa-rated securities as determined by Moody’s Investors Services (Moody’s). None of the securities owned by Trustmark are collateralized by assets which are considered sub-prime. Furthermore, outside of stock ownership in the FHLB of Dallas, FHLB of Atlanta and FRBA, Trustmark does not hold any other equity investment in a GSE or other governmental entity.

As of June 30, 2023, Trustmark did not hold securities of any one issuer with a carrying value exceeding 10% of total shareholders’ equity, other than certain GSEs which are exempt from inclusion. Management continues to closely monitor the credit quality as well as the ratings of the debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by the GSEs and held in Trustmark’s securities portfolio.

The following table presents Trustmark’s securities portfolio by amortized cost and estimated fair value and by credit rating, as determined by Moody’s, at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023
	Amortized Cost					Estimated Fair Value
	Amount		%			Amount		%
Securities Available for Sale
Aaa	$	2,102,821		99.8	%	$	1,867,070		99.7	%
A1 to A3		1,019		—			1,008		0.1	%
Not Rated (1)		3,769		0.2	%		3,805		0.2	%
Total securities available for sale	$	2,107,609		100.0	%	$	1,871,883		100.0	%
Securities Held to Maturity
Aaa	$	1,457,485		99.9	%	$	1,365,196		99.9	%
Not Rated (1)		1,180		0.1	%		1,181		0.1	%
Total securities held to maturity	$	1,458,665		100.0	%	$	1,366,377		100.0	%
	December 31, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Amortized Cost					Estimated Fair Value
	Amount		%			Amount		%
Securities Available for Sale
Aaa	$	2,265,889		99.8	%	$	2,018,912		99.7	%
A1 to A3		1,028		—			1,017		0.1	%
Not Rated (1)		3,792		0.2	%		4,153		0.2	%
Total securities available for sale	$	2,270,709		100.0	%	$	2,024,082		100.0	%
Securities Held to Maturity
Aaa	$	1,490,004		99.7	%	$	1,402,079		99.7	%
Aa1 to Aa3		3,001		0.2	%		2,999		0.2	%
Not Rated (1)		1,509		0.1	%		1,511		0.1	%
Total securities held to maturity	$	1,494,514		100.0	%	$	1,406,589		100.0	%

(1)

Not rated securities primarily consist of Mississippi municipal general obligations.

The table above presenting the credit rating of Trustmark’s securities is formatted to show the securities according to the credit rating category, and not by category of the underlying security.

LHFS

At June 30, 2023, LHFS totaled $181.1 million, consisting of $129.0 million of residential real estate mortgage loans in the process of being sold to third parties and $52.1 million of GNMA optional repurchase loans. At December 31, 2022, LHFS totaled $135.2 million, consisting of $64.4 million of residential real estate mortgage loans in the process of being sold to third parties and $70.8 million of GNMA optional repurchase loans. Please refer to the nonperforming assets table that follows for information on GNMA loans eligible for repurchase which are past due 90 days or more.

Trustmark did not exercise its buy-back option on any delinquent loans serviced for GNMA during the first six months of 2023 or 2022.

For additional information regarding the GNMA optional repurchase loans, please see the section captioned “Past Due LHFS” included in Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI of Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

LHFI

At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, LHFI consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023					December 31, 2022
	Amount		%			Amount		%
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	649,336		5.2	%	$	690,616		5.7	%
Other secured by 1-4 family residential properties		592,289		4.7	%		590,790		4.8	%
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		3,471,728		27.5	%		3,278,830		26.9	%
Other real estate secured		954,410		7.6	%		742,538		6.1	%
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		1,073,321		8.5	%		1,028,926		8.4	%
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		2,261,893		17.9	%		2,185,057		17.9	%
Commercial and industrial loans		1,883,480		14.9	%		1,821,259		14.9	%
Consumer loans		167,540		1.3	%		170,230		1.4	%
State and other political subdivision loans		1,111,710		8.8	%		1,223,863		10.0	%
Other commercial loans		448,260		3.6	%		471,930		3.9	%
LHFI	$	12,613,967		100.0	%	$	12,204,039		100.0	%

LHFI increased $409.9 million, or 3.4%, compared to December 31, 2022. The increase in LHFI during the first six months of 2023 was primarily due to net growth in LHFI secured by real estate and commercial and industrial LHFI, partially offset by a decline in state and other political subdivision LHFI.

LHFI secured by real estate increased $486.2 million, or 5.7%, during the first six months of 2023, primarily due to net growth in LHFI secured by other real estate, LHFI secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties (NFNR), LHFI secured by 1-4 family residential properties and other construction LHFI, partially offset by a decline in construction, land development and other land LHFI. LHFI secured by other real estate increased $211.9 million, or 28.5%, during the first six months of 2023, primarily due to other construction loans that moved to LHFI secured by multi-family residential properties in the Texas, Alabama and Mississippi market regions. Excluding other construction loan reclassifications, LHFI secured by other real estate decreased $82.1 million, or 11.1%, during the first six months of 2023 principally due to declines in LHFI secured by multi-family residential properties in the Mississippi and Texas market regions. NFNR LHFI increased $192.9 million, or 5.9%, during the first six months of 2023 principally due to other construction loans that moved to NFNR LHFI in all five market regions. Excluding other construction loan reclassifications, NFNR LHFI decreased $87.7 million, or 2.7%, during the first six months of 2023 due to declines in nonowner-occupied loans across all market regions with the exception of Texas as well as owner-occupied loans in all market regions with the exception of Mississippi. LHFI secured by 1-4 family residential properties increased $76.8 million, or 3.5%, during the first six months of 2023 primarily reflecting new mortgage loan production. Other construction loans increased $44.4 million, or 4.3%, during the first six months of 2023 primarily due to new construction loans in the Alabama, Texas, Mississippi and Florida market regions partially offset by other construction loans moved to other loan categories upon the completion of the related construction project. During the first six months of 2023, $574.6 million loans were moved from other construction to other loan categories, including $294.0 million to multi-family residential loans, $226.1 million to nonowner-occupied loans and $54.5 million to owner-occupied loans. Excluding all reclassifications between loan categories, growth in other construction loans totaled $619.0 million, or 60.2%, during the first six months of 2023. LHFI secured by construction, land development and other land decreased $41.3 million, or 6.0%, during the first six months of 2023 primarily due to declines in 1-4 family construction, land development and other land loans across all five market regions.

Commercial and industrial LHFI increased $62.2 million, or 3.4%, during the first six months of 2023, primarily reflecting growth in the Alabama and Texas market regions partially offset by declines in the Tennessee and Mississippi market regions. State and other political subdivision LHFI declined $112.2 million, or 9.2%, during the first six months of 2023, reflecting declines across all five market regions with the exception of the Alabama market region.

The following table provides information regarding Trustmark’s home equity loans and home equity lines of credit which are included in the LHFI secured by 1-4 family residential properties for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023			December 31, 2022
Home equity loans	$	47,708		$	45,532
Home equity lines of credit		413,913			412,013
Percentage of loans and lines for which Trustmark holds first lien		49.2	%		51.7	%
Percentage of loans and lines for which Trustmark does not hold first lien		50.8	%		48.3	%

Due to the increased risk associated with second liens, loan terms and underwriting guidelines differ from those used for products secured by first liens. Loan amounts and loan-to-value ratios are limited and are lower for second liens than first liens. Also, interest rates and maximum amortization periods are adjusted accordingly. In addition, regardless of lien position, the passing credit score for approval of all home equity lines of credit is generally higher than that of term loans. The ACL on LHFI is also reflective of the increased risk related to second liens through application of a greater loss factor to this portion of the portfolio.

Trustmark’s variable rate LHFI are based primarily on various prime and SOFR interest rate bases. The following tables provide information regarding the interest rate terms of Trustmark’s LHFI as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023
	Fixed		Variable		Total
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	198,209	$	451,127	$	649,336
Other secured by 1- 4 family residential properties		165,658		426,631		592,289
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		1,412,594		2,059,134		3,471,728
Other real estate secured		104,603		849,807		954,410
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		31,736		1,041,585		1,073,321
Secured by 1- 4 family residential properties		1,379,513		882,380		2,261,893
Commercial and industrial loans		705,654		1,177,826		1,883,480
Consumer loans		139,309		28,231		167,540
State and other political subdivision loans		1,044,060		67,650		1,111,710
Other commercial loans		238,824		209,436		448,260
LHFI	$	5,420,160	$	7,193,807	$	12,613,967
	December 31, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Fixed		Variable		Total
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	204,191	$	486,425	$	690,616
Other secured by 1- 4 family residential properties		162,210		428,580		590,790
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		1,482,199		1,796,631		3,278,830
Other real estate secured		150,378		592,160		742,538
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		33,917		995,009		1,028,926
Secured by 1- 4 family residential properties		1,310,914		874,143		2,185,057
Commercial and industrial loans		612,064		1,209,195		1,821,259
Consumer loans		142,841		27,389		170,230
State and other political subdivision loans		1,163,083		60,780		1,223,863
Other commercial loans		145,378		326,552		471,930
LHFI	$	5,407,175	$	6,796,864	$	12,204,039

In the following tables, LHFI reported by region (along with related nonperforming assets and net charge-offs) are associated with location of origination except for loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties (representing traditional mortgages) and credit cards. These loans are included in the Mississippi Region because they are centrally analyzed and approved as part of a specific line of business located at Trustmark’s headquarters in Jackson, Mississippi.

The following table presents the LHFI composition by region at June 30, 2023 and reflects each region’s diversified mix of loans ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023
LHFI Composition by Region	Total		Alabama		Florida		Mississippi		Tennessee		Texas
Loans secured by real estate:
Construction, land development and other land	$	649,336	$	298,281	$	42,729	$	175,347	$	30,387	$	102,592
Other secured by 1-4 family residential<br>   properties		592,289		136,612		51,817		298,128		78,579		27,153
Secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties		3,471,728		954,604		225,437		1,471,341		159,402		660,944
Other real estate secured		954,410		379,984		1,805		294,497		7,376		270,748
Other loans secured by real estate:
Other construction		1,073,321		519,512		12,116		220,142		—		321,551
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties		2,261,893		—		—		2,257,063		4,830		—
Commercial and industrial loans		1,883,480		576,345		25,686		750,161		257,002		274,286
Consumer loans		167,540		23,785		8,320		105,085		19,288		11,062
State and other political subdivision loans		1,111,710		77,931		61,148		805,342		25,596		141,693
Other commercial loans		448,260		110,535		9,997		215,016		48,929		63,783
LHFI	$	12,613,967	$	3,077,589	$	439,055	$	6,592,122	$	631,389	$	1,873,812
Construction, Land Development and Other Land Loans by Region
Lots	$	69,120	$	29,517	$	10,179	$	14,955	$	4,362	$	10,107
Development		130,166		55,946		1,366		36,602		7,465		28,787
Unimproved land		96,994		20,854		13,859		29,651		4,564		28,066
1-4 family construction		353,056		191,964		17,325		94,139		13,996		35,632
Construction, land development and<br>   other land loans	$	649,336	$	298,281	$	42,729	$	175,347	$	30,387	$	102,592
Loans Secured by Nonfarm, Nonresidential Properties by Region
Nonowner-occupied:
Retail	$	363,101	$	125,094	$	26,313	$	123,940	$	20,570	$	67,184
Office		275,841		102,162		16,822		86,818		2,152		67,887
Hotel/motel		298,632		167,641		50,344		53,705		26,942		—
Mini-storage		144,253		23,282		2,002		99,182		464		19,323
Industrial		375,366		89,226		18,416		103,343		9,976		154,405
Health care		70,788		41,098		—		26,846		338		2,506
Convenience stores		32,385		7,207		438		14,279		572		9,889
Nursing homes/senior living		471,414		174,609		—		201,391		5,249		90,165
Other		132,613		44,071		9,381		60,170		8,655		10,336
Total nonowner-occupied loans		2,164,393		774,390		123,716		769,674		74,918		421,695
Owner-occupied:
Office		153,392		45,525		36,517		43,905		9,906		17,539
Churches		67,325		16,766		4,394		37,537		6,069		2,559
Industrial warehouses		164,540		16,056		4,571		41,402		17,487		85,024
Health care		146,007		10,420		6,141		108,638		2,305		18,503
Convenience stores		149,551		11,834		33,888		68,713		215		34,901
Retail		88,837		11,270		9,271		40,320		18,849		9,127
Restaurants		54,460		4,191		3,925		31,241		11,844		3,259
Auto dealerships		45,878		6,151		213		22,307		17,207		—
Nursing homes/senior living		301,226		44,709		—		230,317		—		26,200
Other		136,119		13,292		2,801		77,287		602		42,137
Total owner-occupied loans		1,307,335		180,214		101,721		701,667		84,484		239,249
Loans secured by nonfarm, nonresidential<br>   properties	$	3,471,728	$	954,604	$	225,437	$	1,471,341	$	159,402	$	660,944

Allowance for Credit Losses

LHFI

Trustmark’s ACL methodology for LHFI is based upon guidance within FASB ASC Subtopic 326-20, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses – Measured at Amortized Cost,” as well as applicable regulatory guidance from its primary regulator. The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Credit quality within the LHFI portfolio is continuously monitored by Management and is reflected within the ACL for loans. The ACL is an estimate of expected losses inherent within Trustmark’s existing LHFI portfolio. The ACL on LHFI is adjusted through the PCL, LHFI and reduced by the charge off of loan amounts, net of recoveries.

The loan loss estimation process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique characteristics of Trustmark’s LHFI portfolio segments. These segments are further disaggregated into loan classes, the level at which credit risk is estimated. When computing allowance levels, credit loss assumptions are estimated using a model that categorizes loan pools based on loss history, delinquency status and other credit trends and risk characteristics, including current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future. Evaluations of the portfolio and individual credits are inherently subjective, as they require estimates, assumptions and judgments as to the facts and circumstances of particular situations.

The econometric models currently in production reflect segment or pool level sensitivities of probability of default (PD) to changes in macroeconomic variables. By measuring the relationship between defaults and changes in the economy, the quantitative reserve incorporates reasonable and supportable forecasts of future conditions that will affect the value of its assets, as required by FASB ASC Topic 326. Under stable forecasts, these linear regressions will reasonably predict a pool’s PD. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the macroeconomic variables used for reasonable and supportable forecasting changed rapidly. At the macroeconomic levels experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is not clear that the models currently in production will produce reasonably representative results since the models were originally estimated using data beginning in 2004 through 2019. During this period, a traditional, albeit severe, economic recession occurred. Thus, econometric models are sensitive to similar future levels of PD.

In order to prevent the econometric models from extrapolating beyond reasonable boundaries of their input variables, Trustmark chose to establish an upper and lower limit process when applying the periodic forecasts. In this way, Management will not rely upon unobserved and untested relationships in the setting of the quantitative reserve. This approach applies to all input variables, including: Southern Unemployment, National Unemployment, National Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Southern GDP, Southern Vacancy Rate and the Prime Rate. The upper and lower limits are based on the distribution of the macroeconomic variable by selecting extreme percentiles at the upper and lower limits of the distribution, the 1st and 99th percentiles, respectively. These upper and lower limits are then used to calculate the PD for the forecast time period in which the forecasted values are outside of the upper and lower limit range. Due to multiple periods having a PD or loss given default (LGD) at or near zero as a result of the improving macroeconomic forecasts, Management implemented PD and LGD floors to account for the risk associated with each portfolio. The PD and LGD floors are based on Trustmark's historical loss experience and applied at a portfolio level.

The external factors qualitative factor is Management’s best judgement on the loan or pool level impact of all factors that affect the portfolio that are not accounted for using any other part of the ACL methodology (i.e., natural disasters, changes in legislation, impacts due to technology and pandemics). Trustmark's External Factor – Pandemic ensures reserve adequacy for collectively evaluated loans most likely to be impacted by the unique economic and behavioral conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional qualitative reserves are derived based on two principles. The first is the disconnect of economic factors to Trustmark’s modeled PD (derived from the econometric models underpinning the quantitative pooled reserves). During the pandemic, extraordinary measures by the federal government were made available to consumers and businesses, including COVID-19 loan payment concessions, direct transfer payments to households, tax deferrals and reduced interest rates, among others. These government interventions may have extended the lag between economic conditions and default, relative to what was captured in the model development data. Because Trustmark’s econometric PD models rely on the observed relationship from the economic downturn from 2007 to 2009 in both timing and severity, Management does not expect the models to reflect these current conditions. For example, while the models would predict contemporaneous unemployment peaks and loan defaults, this may not occur when borrowers can request payment deferrals. Thus, for the affected population, economic conditions are not fully considered as a part of Trustmark’s quantitative reserve. The second principle is the change in risk that is identified by rating changes. As a part of Trustmark’s credit review process, loans in the affected population have been given more frequent screening to ensure accurate ratings are maintained through this dynamic period. Trustmark’s quantitative reserve does not directly address changes in ratings; thus, a migration qualitative factor was designed to work in concert with the quantitative reserve.

As discussed above, the disconnect of economic factors means that changes in rating caused by deteriorating and weak economic conditions as a result of the pandemic are not being captured in the quantitative reserve. During 2020, due to unforeseen pandemic conditions that varied from Management’s expectations, additional reserves were further dimensioned in order to appropriately reflect the risk within the portfolio related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In an effort to ensure the External Factor – Pandemic qualitative factor is reasonable and supportable, historical Trustmark loss data was leveraged to construct a framework that is quantitative in nature. To dimension the additional reserve, Management uses the sensitivity of the quantitative commercial loan reserve to changes in macroeconomic conditions to apply to loans rated acceptable or better (risk rates 1-4). In addition, to account for the known changes in risk, a weighted average of the commercial loan portfolio loss rate, derived from the performance trends qualitative factor, is used to dimension additional reserves for downgraded credits. Loans rated acceptable with risk (risk rate 5) or watch (risk rate 6) received the additional reserves based on the average of the macroeconomic conditions and weighted average of the commercial loan portfolio loss rate while the loans rated special mention (risk rate 7) and substandard (risk rate 8) received additional reserves based on the weighted-average described above. During the fourth quarter of 2022, Management noted that all pass rate loans (risk rate 5 and 6) related to the External Factor - Pandemic qualitative factor either did not experience significant stress related to the pandemic or have since recovered

and does not expect future stresses attributed to the pandemic that may affect these loans. As a result, Management decided to accelerate the release of the additional pandemic reserves on all pass rate loans as a result of pandemic conditions resolving.

During the first quarter of 2022, in order to account for the potential uncertainty related to higher prices and low economic growth, Trustmark chose to enact a portion of the qualitative framework, External Factor - Stagflation. Management calculated the reserve using a third-party stagflation forecast and compared it to the third-party baseline forecast used in the quantitative modeling. The weighted differential was added as qualitative reserves to account for potential uncertainty. During the fourth quarter of 2022, Management determined that the likelihood of a stagflation scenario had sufficiently diminished. Management identified that the potential had already been reduced and effectively captured within a nominally more negative baseline economic forecast. As a result, Management elected to resolve the External Factor - Stagflation and fully release the reserves.

Determining the appropriateness of the allowance is complex and requires judgement by Management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. In future periods, evaluations of the overall LHFI portfolio, in light of the factors and forecasts then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the allowance and credit loss expense.

For a complete description of Trustmark’s ACL methodology and the quantitative and qualitative factors included in the calculation, please see Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

At June 30, 2023, the ACL on LHFI was $129.3 million, an increase of $9.1 million, or 7.6%, when compared with December 31, 2022. The increase in the ACL during the first six months of 2023 was principally due to loan growth and weakening in the macroeconomic forecasts, which also increased reserves related to certain qualitative reserve factors, and extended maturities on mortgage loans resulting from lower prepayment speeds. Allocation of Trustmark’s $129.3 million ACL on LHFI, represented 0.84% of commercial LHFI and 1.60% of consumer and home mortgage LHFI, resulting in an ACL to total LHFI of 1.03% as of June 30, 2023. This compares with an ACL to total LHFI of 0.99% at December 31, 2022, which was allocated to commercial LHFI at 0.85% and to consumer and mortgage LHFI at 1.41%.

The following table presents changes in the ACL on LHFI for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Balance at beginning of period	$	122,239		$	98,734		$	120,214		$	99,457
Provision for credit losses, LHFI		8,211			2,716			11,455			1,856
LHFI charged-off		(2,773	)		(2,277	)		(5,769	)		(4,519	)
Recoveries		1,621			3,967			3,398			6,346
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(1,152	)		1,690			(2,371	)		1,827
Balance at end of period	$	129,298		$	103,140		$	129,298		$	103,140

The increase in net charge-offs when the three months ended June 30, 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to declines in recoveries in all five market regions. The increase in net charge-offs when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was principally due to declines in recoveries in all five market regions as well as increases in charge-offs in the Mississippi and Alabama market regions.

The following table presents the net (charge-offs) recoveries by geographic market region for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Alabama	$	(141	)	$	1,129		$	(409	)	$	1,828
Florida		(35	)		761			(71	)		735
Mississippi		(762	)		(266	)		(1,537	)		(354	)
Tennessee		(166	)		31			(290	)		(393	)
Texas		(48	)		35			(64	)		11
Total net (charge-offs) recoveries	$	(1,152	)	$	1,690		$	(2,371	)	$	1,827

The PCL, LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 totaled 0.26% and 0.18% of average loans (LHFS and LHFI), respectively, compared to 0.10% and 0.03% of average loans (LHFS and LHFI), respectively, for the same time periods in 2022. The PCL on LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of loan growth and weakening in the macroeconomic forecasts, which also increased reserves related to certain qualitative reserve factors, and extended maturities on mortgage loans resulting from lower prepayment speeds.

Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures

Trustmark maintains a separate ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, which is included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Expected credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures are estimated by calculating a commitment usage factor over the contractual period for exposures that are not unconditionally cancellable by Trustmark. Trustmark calculates a loan pool level unfunded amount for the period. Trustmark calculates an expected funding rate each period which is applied to each pool’s unfunded commitment balances to ensure that reserves will be applied to each pool based upon balances expected to be funded based upon historical levels. Additionally, a reserve rate is applied to the unfunded commitment balance, which incorporates both quantitative and qualitative aspects of the current period’s expected credit loss rate. The reserve rate is loan pool specific and is applied to the unfunded amount to ensure loss factors, both quantitative and qualitative, are being considered on the unfunded portion of the loan pool, consistent with the methodology applied to the funded loan pools. See the section captioned “ACL on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures” in Note 12 – Contingencies included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report for complete description of Trustmark’s ACL methodology on off-balance sheet credit exposures.

Adjustments to the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures are recorded to the PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures. At June 30, 2023, the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $34.8 million compared to $36.8 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $2.0 million, or 5.4%. The PCL, off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $245 thousand and a negative $2.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, compared to a negative $1.6 million and a negative $2.7 million, respectively, for the same time periods in 2022. The PCL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the three months ended June 30, 2023, primarily reflected an increase in required reserves as a result of changes in the total reserve rate partially offset by a decrease in required reserves due to a decline in unfunded commitments. The negative PCL on off-balance sheet credit exposures for the first six months of 2023 primarily reflected a decline in required reserves as a result of a decline in unfunded commitments.

Nonperforming Assets

The table below provides the components of nonperforming assets by geographic market region at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):

	June 30, 2023			December 31, 2022
Nonaccrual LHFI
Alabama	$	11,058		$	12,300
Florida		334			227
Mississippi		36,288			24,683
Tennessee		5,088			5,566
Texas		22,259			23,196
Total nonaccrual LHFI		75,027			65,972
Other real estate
Alabama		—			194
Mississippi		1,137			1,769
Tennessee		—			23
Total other real estate		1,137			1,986
Total nonperforming assets	$	76,164		$	67,958
Nonperforming assets/total loans (LHFS and LHFI) and ORE		0.60	%		0.55	%
Loans past due 90 days or more
LHFI	$	3,911		$	3,929
LHFS - Guaranteed GNMA serviced loans (1)	$	35,766		$	49,320

(1)

No obligation to repurchase.

See the previous discussion of LHFS for more information on Trustmark’s serviced GNMA loans eligible for repurchase and the impact of Trustmark’s repurchases of delinquent mortgage loans under the GNMA optional repurchase program.

Nonaccrual LHFI

At June 30, 2023, nonaccrual LHFI totaled $75.0 million, or 0.59% of total LHFS and LHFI, reflecting an increase of $9.1 million, or 13.7%, relative to December 31, 2022. The increase in nonaccrual LHFI during the first six months of 2023 was primarily due to loans

placed on nonaccrual status in the Mississippi market region partially offset by pay-downs of nonaccrual LHFI in the Texas, Mississippi and Alabama market regions.

For additional information regarding nonaccrual LHFI, see the section captioned “Nonaccrual and Past Due LHFI” included in Note 3 – LHFI and Allowance for Credit Losses, LHFI in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Other Real Estate

Other real estate at June 30, 2023 decreased $849 thousand, or 42.7%, when compared with December 31, 2022. The decrease in other real estate was principally due to properties sold in the Mississippi, Tennessee and Alabama market regions, partially offset by properties foreclosed in the Mississippi and Tennessee market regions.

The following tables illustrate changes in other real estate by geographic market region for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
	Total			Alabama		Mississippi			Tennessee
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,684		$	—	$	1,495		$	189
Additions		270			—		229			41
Disposals		(724	)		—		(494	)		(230	)
(Write-downs) recoveries		(93	)		—		(93	)		—
Balance at end of period	$	1,137		$	—	$	1,137		$	—
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Total			Alabama		Mississippi			Tennessee
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,187		$	—	$	3,187		$	—
Additions		411			51		360			—
Disposals		—			—		—			—
(Write-downs) recoveries		(564	)		33		(597	)		—
Balance at end of period	$	3,034		$	84	$	2,950		$	—
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Total			Alabama			Mississippi			Tennessee
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,986		$	194		$	1,769		$	23
Additions		570			—			340			230
Disposals		(1,266	)		(194	)		(819	)		(253	)
(Write-downs) recoveries		(153	)		—			(153	)		—
Balance at end of period	$	1,137		$	—		$	1,137		$	—
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Total			Alabama		Mississippi			Tennessee
Balance at beginning of period	$	4,557		$	—	$	4,557		$	—
Additions		456			51		405			—
Disposals		(1,868	)		—		(1,868	)		—
(Write-downs) recoveries		(111	)		33		(144	)		—
Balance at end of period	$	3,034		$	84	$	2,950		$	—

Other real estate is revalued on an annual basis or more often if market conditions necessitate. Subsequent to foreclosure, losses on the periodic revaluation of the property are charged against the reserve for other real estate write-downs or net income in other real estate expense, if a reserve does not exist. Write-downs of other real estate increased $42 thousand, or 37.8%, when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022, primarily due to an increase in reserves for other real estate write-downs in the Mississippi and Alabama market regions as a result of reserves used during the first six months of 2022 for properties sold for which reserves had previously been established, which were largely offset by a decrease in write-downs of other real estate properties.

For additional information regarding other real estate, please see Note 5 – Other Real Estate included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Deposits

Trustmark’s deposits are its primary source of funding and consist of core deposits from the communities Trustmark serves. Deposits include interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand accounts, savings, money market, certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts. Total deposits were $14.914 billion at June 30, 2023 compared to $14.438 billion at December 31, 2022, an increase of $476.3 million, or 3.3%. During the first six months of 2023, noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $632.7 million, or 15.5%, reflecting declines in all categories of noninterest-bearing deposits reflecting customers' desire for higher-yielding deposit accounts. Interest-bearing deposits increased $1.109 billion, or 10.7%, during the first six months of 2023, primarily due to growth in CDs, which was principally attributable to deposit campaigns offered during the first six months of 2023 and the addition of $598.3 million of brokered CDs, and growth in business interest checking accounts, partially offset by declines in public and consumer interest checking accounts and consumer savings accounts.

At June 30, 2023, Trustmark's total uninsured deposits were $5.379 billion, or 36.1% of total deposits, compared to $5.831 billion, or 40.4% of total deposits, at December 31, 2022.

Borrowings

Trustmark uses short-term borrowings, such as federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and short-term FHLB advances, to fund growth of earning assets in excess of deposit growth. See the section captioned “Liquidity” for further discussion of the components of Trustmark’s excess funding capacity.

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements totaled $311.2 million at June 30, 2023 compared to $449.3 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $138.2 million, or 30.7%, principally due to a decrease in upstream federal funds purchased. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, $41.2 million and $66.3 million represented customer related transactions, such as commercial sweep repurchase balances. Trustmark had $270.0 million of upstream federal funds purchased at June 30, 2023 compared to $383.0 million at December 31, 2022. The decrease in the upstream federal funds purchased was principally due to a decrease in the reserve balance at the FRBA.

Other borrowings totaled $1.057 billion at June 30, 2023, an increase of $5.8 million, or 0.5%, when compared with $1.051 billion at December 31, 2022, principally due to a slight increase in short-term FHLB advances obtained from the FHLB of Dallas largely offset by a decline in GNMA loans eligible for repurchase.

Legal Environment

Information required in this section is set forth under the heading “Legal Proceedings” of Note 12 – Contingencies included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Information required in this section is set forth under the heading “Lending Related” of Note 12 – Contingencies included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Trustmark places a significant emphasis on the maintenance of a strong capital position, which promotes investor confidence, provides access to funding sources under favorable terms and enhances Trustmark’s ability to capitalize on business growth and acquisition opportunities. Higher levels of liquidity, however, bear corresponding costs, measured in terms of lower yields on short-term, more liquid earning assets and higher expenses for extended liability maturities. Trustmark manages capital based upon risks and growth opportunities as well as regulatory requirements. Trustmark utilizes a capital model in order to provide Management with a monthly tool for analyzing changes in its strategic capital ratios. This allows Management to hold sufficient capital to provide for growth opportunities and protect the balance sheet against sudden adverse market conditions, while maintaining an attractive return on equity to shareholders.

At June 30, 2023, Trustmark’s total shareholders’ equity was $1.571 billion, an increase of $78.9 million, or 5.3%, when compared to December 31, 2022. During the first six months of 2023, shareholders’ equity increased primarily as a result of net income of $95.3 million, partially offset by common stock dividends of $28.3 million.

Regulatory Capital

Trustmark and TNB are subject to minimum risk-based capital and leverage capital requirements, as described in the section captioned “Capital Adequacy” included in Part I. Item 1. – Business of Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Report, which are administered by the federal bank regulatory agencies. These capital requirements, as defined by federal regulations, involve quantitative and qualitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet instruments. Trustmark’s and TNB’s minimum risk-based capital requirements include a capital conservation buffer of 2.50%. AOCI is not included in computing regulatory capital. Trustmark elected the five-year phase-in transition period (through December 31, 2024) related to adopting FASB ASU 2016-13 for regulatory capital purposes. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements of Trustmark and TNB and limit Trustmark’s and TNB’s ability to pay dividends. As of June 30, 2023, Trustmark and TNB exceeded all applicable minimum capital standards. In addition, Trustmark and TNB met applicable regulatory guidelines to be considered well-capitalized at June 30, 2023. To be categorized in this manner, Trustmark and TNB maintained, as applicable, minimum common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage ratios, and were not subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive issued by their primary federal regulators to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measures. There are no significant conditions or events that have occurred since June 30, 2023 which Management believes have affected Trustmark’s or TNB’s present classification.

In 2020, Trustmark enhanced its capital structure with the issuance of $125.0 million of subordinated notes. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the carrying amount of the subordinated notes was $123.4 million and $123.3 million, respectively. The subordinated notes mature December 1, 2030 and are redeemable at Trustmark’s option under certain circumstances. For regulatory capital purposes, the subordinated notes qualified as Tier 2 capital for Trustmark at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. Trustmark may utilize the full carrying value of the subordinated notes as Tier 2 capital until December 1, 2025 (five years prior to maturity). Beginning December 1, 2025, the subordinated notes will phase out of Tier 2 capital 20.0% each year until maturity.

In 2006, Trustmark enhanced its capital structure with the issuance of trust preferred securities. For regulatory capital purposes, the trust preferred securities qualified as Tier 1 capital at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. Trustmark intends to continue to utilize $60.0 million in trust preferred securities issued by Trustmark Preferred Capital Trust I (the Trust) as Tier 1 capital up to the regulatory limit, as permitted by the grandfather provision in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Basel III capital rules.

Refer to the section captioned “Regulatory Capital” included in Note 15 – Shareholders’ Equity in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report for an illustration of Trustmark’s and TNB’s actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios under regulatory capital standards in effect at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Dividends on Common Stock

Dividends per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 were $0.46. Trustmark’s indicated dividend for 2023 is $0.92 per common share, which is the same as dividends per common share declared in 2022.

Stock Repurchase Program

From time to time, Trustmark's Board of Directors has authorized stock repurchase plans. In general, stock repurchase plans allow Trustmark to proactively manage its capital position and return excess capital to shareholders. Shares purchased also provide Trustmark with shares of common stock necessary to satisfy obligations related to stock compensation awards.

On December 7, 2021, the Board of Directors of Trustmark authorized a stock repurchase program, effective January 1, 2022, under which $100.0 million of Trustmark’s outstanding common stock could be acquired through December 31, 2022. Under this authority, Trustmark repurchased approximately 789 thousand shares of its common stock value at $24.6 million during 2022.

On December 6, 2022, the Board of Directors of Trustmark authorized a new stock repurchase program, effective January 1, 2023, under which $50.0 million of Trustmark's outstanding common stock may be acquired through December 31, 2023. The repurchase program, which is subject to market conditions and management discretion, will be implemented through open market repurchases or privately negotiated transactions. No shares were repurchased under this authority during the first six months of 2023.

Liquidity

Liquidity is the ability to ensure that sufficient cash flow and liquid assets are available to satisfy current and future financial obligations, including demand for loans and deposit withdrawals, funding operating costs and other corporate purposes. Consistent cash flows from

operations and adequate capital provide internally generated liquidity. Furthermore, Management maintains funding capacity from a variety of external sources to meet daily funding needs, such as those required to meet deposit withdrawals, loan disbursements and security settlements. Liquidity strategy also includes the use of wholesale funding sources to provide for the seasonal fluctuations of deposit and loan demand and the cyclical fluctuations of the economy that impact the availability of funds. Management keeps excess funding capacity available to meet potential demands associated with adverse circumstances.

The asset side of the balance sheet provides liquidity primarily through maturities and cash flows from loans and securities as well as the ability to pledge or sell certain loans and securities. The liability portion of the balance sheet provides liquidity primarily through noninterest and interest-bearing deposits. Trustmark utilizes federal funds purchased, FHLB advances, securities sold under repurchase agreements, the Federal Reserve Discount Window (Discount Window) and brokered deposits to provide additional liquidity. Access to these additional sources represents Trustmark’s incremental borrowing capacity.

Trustmark's liquidity position is continuously monitored and adjustments are made to manage the balance as deemed appropriate. Liquidity risk management is an important element to Trustmark's asset/liability management process. Trustmark regularly models liquidity stress scenarios to assess potential liquidity outflows or funding problems resulting from economic disruptions or other significant occurrences as deemed appropriate by Management. These scenarios are incorporated into Trustmark's contingency funding plan, which provides the basis for the identification of its liquidity needs.

Deposit accounts represent Trustmark’s largest funding source. Average deposits totaled $14.702 billion for the first six months of 2023 and represented approximately 78.9% of average liabilities and shareholders’ equity, compared to average deposits of $14.990 billion, which represented 85.9% of average liabilities and shareholders’ equity for the first six months of 2022. The decline in total average deposits when the first six months of 2023 is compared to the same time period in 2022 was a result of a decline in average noninterest-bearing deposits partially offset by an increase in average interest-bearing deposits, reflecting customers’ desire for higher yielding deposit accounts as well as increased competition for deposits.

Trustmark had $518.7 million held in an interest-bearing account at the FRBA at June 30, 2023, compared to $434.0 million held at December 31, 2022.

Trustmark utilizes brokered deposits to supplement other wholesale funding sources. At June 30, 2023, brokered sweep MMDA deposits totaled $16.4 million compared to $15.1 million at December 31, 2022. In addition, Trustmark had $598.3 million of brokered CDs at June 30, 2023 compared to none at December 31, 2022. The increase in brokered CDs during the first six months of 2023 was principally to fund loan growth.

At June 30, 2023 Trustmark had $270.0 million of upstream federal funds purchased compared to $383.0 million of upstream federal funds purchased at December 31, 2022. Trustmark maintains adequate federal funds lines to provide sufficient short-term liquidity.

Trustmark maintains a relationship with the FHLB of Dallas, which provided $1.000 billion of outstanding short-term and no long-term advances at June 30, 2023, compared to $975.0 million of outstanding short-term and no long-term advances at December 31, 2022. Trustmark had no standby letters of credit outstanding with the FHLB of Dallas at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. Under the existing borrowing agreement, Trustmark had sufficient qualifying collateral to increase FHLB advances or letters of credit with the FHLB of Dallas by $3.158 billion at June 30, 2023.

In addition, at June 30, 2023, Trustmark had no short-term and $68 thousand in long-term FHLB advances outstanding with the FHLB of Atlanta, which were acquired in the BancTrust merger in 2013, compared to no short-term and $78 thousand in long-term FHLB advances at December 31, 2022. Trustmark has non-member status and thus no additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB of Atlanta.

Additionally, Trustmark has the ability to leverage its unencumbered investment securities as collateral. At June 30, 2023, Trustmark had approximately $1.000 billion available in unencumbered Treasury and agency securities compared to $797.0 million at December 31, 2022.

Another borrowing source is the Discount Window. At June 30, 2023, Trustmark had approximately $1.405 billion available in collateral capacity at the Discount Window primarily from pledges of commercial and industrial LHFI, compared with $1.345 billion at December 31, 2022.

Additionally, on March 15, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FRB reduced reserve requirements for insured depository institutions to zero percent, which increased TNB’s available liquidity.

On March 12, 2023, the U.S. Treasury Department, the FRB and the FDIC jointly announced the establishment of the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), in response to recent liquidity concerns within the banking industry in part due to recent deposit runs that

resulted in a few large bank failures. The BTFP was designed to provide available additional funding to eligible depository institutions to help assure that banks have the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors. Under the program, eligible depository institutions can obtain loans of up to one year in length by pledging U.S. Treasuries, agency debt and mortgage-backed securities and other qualifying assets (valued at par) as collateral. The BTFP is intended to eliminate the need for depository institutions to quickly sell their securities when they are experiencing stress on their liquidity. As of June 30, 2023, Trustmark had not accessed the BTFP.

During 2020, Trustmark issued $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.625% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the carrying amount of the subordinated notes was $123.4 million and $123.3 million, respectively. The subordinated notes mature December 1, 2030 and are redeemable at Trustmark’s option under certain circumstances. The subordinated notes are unsecured obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to all of Trustmark’s existing and future senior indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured. The subordinated notes are obligations of Trustmark only and are not obligations of, and are not guaranteed by, any of its subsidiaries, including TNB.

During 2006, Trustmark completed a private placement of $60.0 million of trust preferred securities through a newly formed Delaware trust affiliate, the Trust. The trust preferred securities mature September 30, 2036 and are redeemable at Trustmark’s option. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities were used by the Trust to purchase $61.9 million in aggregate principal amount of Trustmark’s junior subordinated debentures.

The Board of Directors of Trustmark currently has the authority to issue up to 20.0 million preferred shares with no par value. The ability to issue preferred shares in the future will provide Trustmark with additional financial and management flexibility for general corporate and acquisition purposes. At June 30, 2023, Trustmark had no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Management believes that Trustmark has sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet presently known cash flow requirements arising from ongoing business transactions. As of June 30, 2023, Management is not aware of any events that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Trustmark's liquidity, capital resources or operations. In addition, Management is not aware of any regulatory recommendations regarding liquidity that would have a material adverse effect on Trustmark.

In the ordinary course of business, Trustmark has entered into contractual obligations and has made other commitments to make future payments. Please refer to the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report and Trustmark's 2022 Annual Report for the expected timing of such payments as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. There have been no material changes in Trustmark's contractual obligations since year-end.

Asset/Liability Management

Overview

Market risk reflects the potential risk of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and market prices. Trustmark has risk management policies to monitor and limit exposure to market risk. Trustmark’s primary market risk is interest rate risk created by core banking activities. Interest rate risk is the potential variability of the income generated by Trustmark’s financial products or services, which results from changes in various market interest rates. Market rate changes may take the form of absolute shifts, variances in the relationships between different rates and changes in the shape or slope of the interest rate term structure.

Following the LIBOR cessation date of June 30, 2023, the nationwide process for replacing LIBOR in financial contracts that mature thereafter and that do not provide for an effective means to replace LIBOR upon its cessation took effect pursuant to the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act. For contracts in which a party has the discretion to identify a replacement rate, the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act also provides a safe harbor to parties if they choose the SOFR-based benchmark replacement rate to be identified by the FRB. Trustmark had a significant number of loans, derivative contracts, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that were either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. As of June 30, 2023, substantially all of Trustmark’s LIBOR exposure was remediated or in the process of being remediated and the remaining LIBOR-based contracts are expected to transition out of LIBOR dependency by year-end 2023. The transition from LIBOR could create costs and additional risk. Trustmark cannot predict what the ultimate impact of the transition from LIBOR will be; however, Trustmark has implemented various measures to manage the transition and mitigate risks. For additional information regarding the transition from LIBOR and Trustmark’s management of this transition, please see the respective risk factor included in Part I. Item 1A. – Risk Factors, of Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Report.

Management continually develops and applies cost-effective strategies to manage these risks. Management’s Asset/Liability Committee sets the day-to-day operating guidelines, approves strategies affecting net interest income and coordinates activities within policy limits established by the Board of Directors of Trustmark. A key objective of the asset/liability management program is to quantify, monitor and manage interest rate risk and to assist Management in maintaining stability in the net interest margin under varying interest rate environments.

Derivatives

Trustmark uses financial derivatives for management of interest rate risk. Management’s Asset/Liability Committee, in its oversight role for the management of interest rate risk, approves the use of derivatives in balance sheet hedging strategies. The most common derivatives employed by Trustmark are interest rate lock commitments, forward contracts (both futures contracts and options on futures contracts), interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and interest rate floors. As a general matter, the values of these instruments are designed to be inversely related to the values of the assets that they hedge (i.e., if the value of the hedged asset falls, the value of the related hedge rises). In addition, Trustmark has entered into derivatives contracts as counterparty to one or more customers in connection with loans extended to those customers. These transactions are designed to hedge interest rate, currency or other exposures of the customers and are not entered into by Trustmark for speculative purposes. Increased federal regulation of the derivatives markets may increase the cost to Trustmark to administer derivatives programs.

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

During the third quarter of 2022, Trustmark initiated a cash flow hedging program. Trustmark's objectives in initiating this hedging program were to add stability to interest income and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of fixed-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for Trustmark making variable-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate floor spreads designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts if interest rates fall below the purchased floor strike rate on the contract and payments of variable-rate amounts if interest rates fall below the sold floor strike rate on the contract. Trustmark uses such derivatives to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing and anticipated variable-rate loan assets. At June 30, 2023, the aggregate notional value of Trustmark's interest rate swaps and floor spreads designated as cash flow hedges totaled $975.0 million compared to $825.0 million at December 31, 2022.

Trustmark records any gains or losses on these cash flow hedges in AOCI. Gains and losses on derivatives representing hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized over the life of the hedge on a systematic and rational basis, as documented at hedge inception in accordance with Trustmark’s accounting policy election. The earnings recognition of excluded components totaled $13 thousand and $22 thousand of amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, and is included in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI. As interest payments are received on Trustmark's variable-rate assets, amounts reported in AOCI are reclassified into interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI in the accompanying consolidated statements of income during the same period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, Trustmark reclassified a loss, net of tax, of $3.0 million and $5.2 million, respectively, into interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI. During the next twelve months, Trustmark estimates that $17.7 million will be reclassified as a reduction to interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI. This amount could differ due to changes in interest rates, hedge de-designations or the addition of other hedges.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

As part of Trustmark’s risk management strategy in the mortgage banking business, various derivative instruments such as interest rate lock commitments and forward sales contracts are utilized. Rate lock commitments are residential mortgage loan commitments with customers, which guarantee a specified interest rate for a specified period of time. Trustmark’s obligations under forward contracts consist of commitments to deliver mortgage loans, originated and/or purchased, in the secondary market at a future date. The gross notional amount of Trustmark’s off-balance sheet obligations under these derivative instruments totaled $295.2 million at June 30, 2023, with a positive valuation adjustment of $1.5 million, compared to $165.4 million, with a positive valuation adjustment of $325 thousand at December 31, 2022.

Trustmark utilizes a portfolio of exchange-traded derivative instruments, such as Treasury note futures contracts and option contracts, to achieve a fair value return that economically hedges changes in fair value of the MSR attributable to interest rates. These transactions are considered freestanding derivatives that do not otherwise qualify for hedge accounting under GAAP. The total notional amount of these derivative instruments was $277.5 million at June 30, 2023 compared to $277.0 million at December 31, 2022. These exchange-traded derivative instruments are accounted for at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded as noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and are offset by the changes in the fair value of the MSR. The MSR fair value represents the present value of future cash flows, which among other things includes decay and the effect of changes in interest rates. Ineffectiveness of hedging the MSR fair value is measured by comparing the change in value of hedge instruments to the change in the fair value of the MSR asset attributable to changes in interest rates and other market driven changes in valuation inputs and assumptions. The impact of this strategy resulted in a net negative ineffectiveness of $1.3 million and $632 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, the impact of this strategy was a net negative ineffectiveness of $3.1 million and a net positive ineffectiveness of $374 thousand, respectively.

Trustmark offers certain interest rate derivatives products directly to qualified commercial lending clients seeking to manage their interest rate risk under loans they have entered into with TNB. Trustmark economically hedges interest rate swap transactions executed with commercial lending clients by entering into offsetting interest rate swap transactions with institutional derivatives market participants. Derivatives transactions executed as part of this program are not designated as qualifying hedging relationships under GAAP and are, therefore, carried on Trustmark’s financial statements at fair value with the change in fair value recorded as noninterest income in bank card and other fees. Because these derivatives have mirror-image contractual terms, in addition to collateral provisions which mitigate the impact of non-performance risk, the changes in fair value are expected to substantially offset. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange rules legally characterize variation margin collateral payments made or received for centrally cleared interest rate swaps as settlements rather than collateral. As a result, centrally cleared interest rate swaps included in other assets and other liabilities are presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2023, Trustmark had interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.420 billion related to this program, compared to $1.391 billion as of December 31, 2022.

Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features

Trustmark has agreements with its financial institution counterparties that contain provisions where if Trustmark defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then Trustmark could also be deemed to be in default on its derivatives obligations.

At both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, there was no termination value of interest rate swaps in a liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, Trustmark had posted collateral of $1.2 million and $740 thousand, respectively, against its obligations because of negotiated thresholds and minimum transfer amounts under these agreements. If Trustmark had breached any of these triggering provisions at June 30, 2023, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value (which is expected to approximate fair market value).

Credit risk participation agreements arise when Trustmark contracts with other financial institutions, as a guarantor or beneficiary, to share credit risk associated with certain interest rate swaps. These agreements provide for reimbursement of losses resulting from a third-party default on the underlying swap. At June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, Trustmark had entered into five risk participation agreements as a beneficiary with an aggregate notional amount of $49.5 million and $50.2 million, respectively. At June 30, 2023, Trustmark had entered into thirty-one risk participation agreements as a guarantor with an aggregate notional amount of $246.3 million, compared to twenty-nine risk participation agreements as a guarantor with an aggregate notional amount of $235.8 million at December 31, 2022. The aggregate fair values of these risk participation agreements were immaterial at both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Trustmark’s participation in the derivatives markets is subject to increased federal regulation of these markets. Trustmark believes that it may continue to use financial derivatives to manage interest rate risk and also to offer derivatives products to certain qualified commercial lending clients in compliance with the Volcker Rule. However, the increased federal regulation of the derivatives markets has increased the cost to Trustmark of administering its derivatives programs. Some of these costs (particularly compliance costs related to the Volcker Rule and other federal regulations) are expected to recur in the future.

Market/Interest Rate Risk Management

The primary purpose in managing interest rate risk is to invest capital effectively and preserve the value created by the core banking business. This is accomplished through the development and implementation of lending, funding, pricing and hedging strategies designed to maximize net interest income performance under varying interest rate environments subject to specific liquidity and interest rate risk guidelines.

Financial simulation models are the primary tools used by Management’s Asset/Liability Committee to measure interest rate exposure. The significant increase in short-term market interest rates and the overall interest rate environment is likely to affect the balance sheet composition and rates. The simulation incorporates assumptions regarding the effects of such changes based on a combination of historical analysis and expected behavior. Using a wide range of scenarios, Management is provided with extensive information on the potential impact on net interest income caused by changes in interest rates. Models are structured to simulate cash flows and accrual characteristics of Trustmark’s balance sheet. Assumptions are made about the direction and volatility of interest rates, the slope of the yield curve and the changing composition of Trustmark’s balance sheet, resulting from both strategic plans and customer behavior. In addition, the model incorporates Management’s assumptions and expectations regarding such factors as loan and deposit growth, pricing, prepayment speeds and spreads between interest rates.

Based on the results of the simulation models using static balances, the table below summarizes the effect various one-year interest rate shift scenarios would have on net interest income compared to a base case, flat scenario at June 30, 2023 and 2022. Given the substantial increase in market rates, the down 200 basis points scenario has been added to the table below for the six months ended June 30, 2023.

	Estimated % Change<br>in Net Interest Income
Change in Interest Rates	2023			2022
+200 basis points		3.1	%		11.3	%
+100 basis points		1.6	%		5.7	%
-100 basis points		-1.7	%		-11.6	%
-200 basis points		-3.6	%		—

Management cannot provide any assurance about the actual effect of changes in interest rates on net interest income. The estimates provided do not include the effects of possible strategic changes in the balances of various assets and liabilities throughout 2023 or additional actions Trustmark could undertake in response to changes in interest rates. Management will continue to prudently manage the balance sheet in an effort to control interest rate risk and maintain profitability over the long term.

Another component of interest rate risk management is measuring the economic value-at-risk for a given change in market interest rates. The economic value-at-risk may indicate risks associated with longer-term balance sheet items that may not affect net interest income at risk over shorter time periods. Trustmark uses computer-modeling techniques to determine the present value of all asset and liability cash flows (both on- and off-balance sheet), adjusted for prepayment expectations, using a market discount rate. The economic value of equity (EVE), also known as net portfolio value, is defined as the difference between the present value of asset cash flows and the present value of liability cash flows. The resulting change in EVE in different market rate environments, from the base case scenario, is the amount of EVE at risk from those rate environments.

The following table summarizes the effect that various interest rate shifts would have on net portfolio value at June 30, 2023 and 2022.

	Estimated % Change<br>in Net Portfolio Value
Change in Interest Rates	2023			2022
+200 basis points		-3.6	%		2.3	%
+100 basis points		-1.7	%		1.4	%

Trustmark determines the fair value of the MSR using a valuation model administered by a third party that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The model incorporates assumptions that market participants use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, default rates, cost to service (including delinquency and foreclosure costs), escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income and other ancillary income such as late fees. Management reviews all significant assumptions quarterly. Mortgage loan prepayment speeds, a key assumption in the model, is the annual rate at which borrowers are forecasted to repay their mortgage loan principal. The discount rate used to determine the present value of estimated future net servicing income, another key assumption in the model, is an estimate of the required rate of return investors in the market would require for an asset with similar risk. Both assumptions can, and generally will, change as market conditions and interest rates change.

By way of example, an increase in either the prepayment speed or discount rate assumption will result in a decrease in the fair value of the MSR, while a decrease in either assumption will result in an increase in the fair value of the MSR. In recent years, there have been significant market-driven fluctuations in loan prepayment speeds and discount rates. These fluctuations can be rapid and may continue to be significant. Therefore, estimating prepayment speed and/or discount rates within ranges that market participants would use in determining the fair value of the MSR requires significant management judgment.

At June 30, 2023, the MSR fair value was $134.4 million, compared to $121.0 million at June 30, 2022. The impact on the MSR fair value of a 10% adverse change in prepayment speed or a 100 basis point increase in discount rate at June 30, 2023, would be a decline in fair value of approximately $4.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively, compared to a decline in fair value of approximately $4.4 million and $5.1 million, respectively, at June 30, 2022. Changes of equal magnitude in the opposite direction would produce similar increases in fair value in the respective amounts.

Critical Accounting Policies

For an overview of Trustmark’s critical accounting policies, see the section captioned “Critical Accounting Policies” included in Part II. Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Report. There have been no significant changes in Trustmark’s critical accounting policies during the first six months of 2023.

For additional information regarding Trustmark’s basis of presentation and accounting policies, see Note 1 – Business, Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Principles of Consolidation included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

Accounting Policies Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

For a complete list of recently adopted and pending accounting policies and the impact on Trustmark, see Note 19 – Accounting Policies Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements included in Part I. Item 1. – Financial Statements of this report.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information required by this item is included in the discussion of Market/Interest Rate Risk Management found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by Trustmark’s Management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of Trustmark’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer concluded that Trustmark’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in Trustmark’s internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Trustmark’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information required in this section is set forth under the heading “Legal Proceedings” of Note 12 – Contingencies in Part I. Item 1 – Financial Statements of this report.

In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 450-20, “Loss Contingencies,” Trustmark will establish an accrued liability for litigation matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. At the present time, Trustmark believes, based on its evaluation and the advice of legal counsel, that a loss in any such proceeding is not probable and reasonably estimable. All matters will continue to be monitored for further developments that would make such loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal proceedings, Trustmark cannot predict the eventual outcomes of the currently pending matters or the timing of their ultimate resolution. Trustmark currently believes, however, based upon the advice of legal counsel and Management’s evaluation and after taking into account its current insurance coverage, that the legal proceedings currently pending should not have a material adverse effect on Trustmark’s consolidated financial condition.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There has been no material change in the risk factors previously disclosed in Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Report.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On December 6, 2022, the Board of Directors of Trustmark authorized a new stock repurchase program, effective January 1, 2023, under which $50.0 million of Trustmark's outstanding common stock may be acquired through December 31, 2023. The shares may be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or private transactions, depending on market conditions,

and in conjunction with its disciplined share repurchase framework. There is no guarantee as to the number of shares that may be repurchased by Trustmark, and Trustmark may discontinue repurchases at any time at Management's discretion.

The following table provides information with respect to purchases by Trustmark or made on behalf of Trustmark of its common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2023 ($ in thousands, except per share amounts):

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan at the End of the Period
April 1, 2023 to April 30, 2023		—	$	—		—	$	50,000
May 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023		—		—		—		50,000
June 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023		—		—		—		50,000
Total		—				—

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Securities Trading Plans of Directors and Executive Officers

During the three months ended June 30, 2023, none of Trustmark’s directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of Trustmark’s securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K).

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference.

EXHIBIT INDEX

31-a	Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31-b	Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32-a	Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32-b	Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101	Inline XBRL Interactive Data.
104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

* - Denotes management contract.

All other exhibits are omitted, as they are inapplicable or not required by the related instructions.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

BY:	/s/ Duane A. Dewey	BY:	/s/ Thomas C. Owens
	Duane A. Dewey		Thomas C. Owens
	President and Chief Executive Officer		Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
DATE:	August 7, 2023	DATE:	August 7, 2023

EX-31.a

Exhibit 31-a

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Duane A. Dewey, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trustmark Corporation;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

BY:	/s/ Duane A. Dewey
	Duane A. Dewey
	President and Chief Executive Officer
DATE:	August 7, 2023

EX-31.b

Exhibit 31-b

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas C. Owens, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trustmark Corporation;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

BY:	/s/ Thomas C. Owens
	Thomas C. Owens
	Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
DATE:	August 7, 2023

EX-32.a

Exhibit 32-a

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Duane A. Dewey, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trustmark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trustmark.

BY:	/s/ Duane A. Dewey
	Duane A. Dewey
	President and Chief Executive Officer
DATE:	August 7, 2023

EX-32.b

Exhibit 32-b

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas C. Owens, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Trustmark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trustmark.

BY:	/s/ Thomas C. Owens
	Thomas C. Owens
	Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
DATE:	August 7, 2023