Earnings Call Transcript
HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC)
Earnings Call Transcript - HAFC Q4 2021
Operator, Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Hanmi Financial Corporation's Fourth Quarter 2021 Conference Call. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded for replay purposes. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the call over to Maura [indiscernible], Investor Relations for Hanmi Financial. Please go ahead.
Maura [indiscernible], Investor Relations
Thank you, Kylie, and thank you all for joining us today to discuss Hanmi Financial's fourth and full year 2021 results. This comes after Hanmi issued its earnings release and quarterly supplemental slide presentation to accompany today’s call. Both documents are available in the IR section of the company’s website at hanmi.com. I’m here today with Bonnie Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hanmi Financial Corporation; Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer; and Ron Santarosa, Chief Financial Officer. Bonnie Lee will begin today’s call with an overview of Hanmi’s 2021 accomplishments; Anthony Kim will discuss loan and deposit activities; Ron Santarosa will provide more details on our financial performance; and then Bonnie Lee will provide closing comments before we open the call up to your questions. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that today's comments may include forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are based on current plans, expectations, events, and financial industry trends that may affect the company's future operating results and financial performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by our forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. A discussion of the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements can be found in our SEC filings, including our reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q. In particular, we direct you to the discussion of certain risk factors affecting our business contained in our earnings release, our investor presentation, and in our Form 10-K. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Bonnie Lee. Bonnie, please go ahead.
Bonnie Lee, President and CEO
Thank you, Maura. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss our 2021 fourth-quarter and year-end results. 2021 was a very eventful year with a continuation of a global pandemic, political and social volatility, and shifting economic macros. Each of these factors presented challenges as well as opportunities for Hanmi, and our team executed exceptionally well. During the year, we focused on meeting the banking needs of the multi-ethnic communities we serve across our markets. Guided by our strategic growth plan, we expanded our products and services offerings, we grew and diversified our loan and deposit portfolios, and by working closely with our customers, we further strengthened our portfolio and asset quality metrics. The results of consistent execution throughout 2021 demonstrate that we delivered strong results, meeting and even exceeding the objectives we laid out a year ago. Today, we are better positioned than ever to meet the evolving needs of tomorrow's customers while continuing to be a trusted community partner to customers who have banked with us for nearly 40 years. This foundation will enable us to deliver sustained growth and profitability over the long term. As I outlined at the beginning of last year, we focused on several strategic growth initiatives in 2021. These included growing our residential mortgage platform, investing in our digital banking platform, extending our corporate Korea initiative, and adding to our talented team of relationship managers. I am pleased to report our success on all fronts. Let me share a few details. First, 2021 marked the first full year of production from our residential mortgage platform. Through this platform, we originate non-qualified residential loans and mortgage warehouse lines. This business is an effective way to diversify our loan portfolio by adding a lower-risk asset class that we can grow profitably for years to come. And we are pleased to report that our residential mortgage production ramped meaningfully in 2021, reaching 11% of our total loan production for the year. Second, we made meaningful investments in talent and technology to ensure we meet our customers' digital banking needs and expectations. Our digital platform enables us to efficiently scale services for both existing and new customers across our markets and business lines. Importantly, we're improving the customer experience, providing more convenient and seamless interactions. Third, we made substantial progress in growing our corporate Korea initiative, which represented 14% of our total loan production in 2021. We launched this initiative in 2019 to develop and expand relationships with Korean companies domiciled in the United States. We have a dedicated team of bankers in this business who provide our clients with lines of credit, real estate investment lending, equipment financing, asset-based lending, and other services. They deliver service in both Korean and English, bridging language divides for these unique companies in major California markets as well as key metropolitan areas such as New York, New Jersey, Georgia, Alabama, and Texas. It is important to note that as we increase lending with our corporate Korea customers, we are also developing new deposit relationships that tend to be sticky. These relationships provide Hanmi with substantial low-cost liquidity to fund both short and long-term growth. In that regard, fourth-quarter deposits increased 10% year-over-year, noninterest-bearing DDAs increased 36% for the year and now account for 44.5% of total deposits, up from 36% a year earlier. These strategic growth initiatives, along with strong momentum across our diverse business lines, fueled growth in our loan and lease production in 2021, culminating with a record 625.1 million in production for the fourth quarter. Our multi-lending and leasing businesses were solid contributors to this performance, complementing strength in our commercial real estate and commercial and industrial lending businesses. Our record on production trends in 2021 demonstrate that our growth strategies are working. Hanmi’s strategic footprint in major markets across the country places us in many of the most populous, diverse, and economically vibrant markets. We are pleased that as we continued to grow and expand our footprint and product portfolio, we were able to successfully attract top talent with a growth mindset. In 2021, we added a dozen senior relationship managers across our markets, so we are well-positioned to serve more customers as the economy continues to gain momentum in 2022. Finally, our comprehensive approach to credit management, including our ability to secure payments and repay loans, as well as our relationship banking model, led to improved trends in asset quality last year. Non-performing loans declined 84% year-over-year, and at the end of 2021 accounted for just 26 basis points of total loans. Our 16 million recovery of a credit loss expense in the fourth quarter included a 9.1 million recovery from a first-quarter 2020 loan charge-off. While we anticipate additional recoveries from this relationship over time, we expect future recoveries to be smaller in magnitude. Our allowance for loan losses remains strong at 1.41% of loans, and we are confident in our ability to effectively manage credit quality going forward. As I said earlier, solid execution across our platform and markets enables us to deliver strong earnings for the year. We reported a full year 2021 net income of 98.7 million, or 3.22 per diluted share, up from 42.2 million, or 1.38 per diluted share in 2020. These results demonstrate both the earnings power and the ongoing potential of our bank. Looking ahead, we're well positioned for another successful year in 2022 to deliver growth, profitability, and shareholder returns. In 2022 and beyond, we will focus on executing against the following strategic priorities this year: ramping up our successful residential mortgage business to contribute 10% to 15% of 2022 loan production, further diversifying our loan portfolio by first increasing multifamily and SBA loans and second by expanding our corporate Korea initiative with the goal of generating 10% to 15% of our total loans and growing the percentage of our deposits from this program, increasing our focus on corporate clients to drive meaningful growth in both sources of stable, low-cost deposits, and seeking out and evaluating opportunities in high-growth and deposit-rich verticals that need relationship banking partners like Hanmi. With that, I'll turn the call over to Anthony Kim, our Chief Banking Officer, to discuss fourth-quarter loan production and deposit gathering in more detail.
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
Thank you, Bonnie. I'll start off with some additional color on our loan and lease production. We grew our fourth-quarter production volumes by 25% from the prior quarter to a record 625 million, almost double our fourth-quarter production a year ago. We generated sequential quarter growth in all major loan categories, with notable strength in commercial real estate as well as residential mortgages. With record loan production, our loans receivable balance for the fourth quarter was 5.15 billion, up 6% from the prior quarter. Payoffs moderated to 252 million for the fourth quarter from 292 million for the prior quarter. Excluding PPP loans, our loans receivable balance grew 6.4% quarter-over-quarter and 4.3% year-over-year. In commercial real estate production, loans to clients for mixed-use, industrial, and warehouse properties helped drive quarter-over-quarter improvements. Our new relationship managers and our long-tenured bankers continued to generate new business and their collective efforts resulted in a healthy pipeline as we enter 2022. As Bonnie noted, our residential mortgage platform is making meaningful contributions to our results, accounting for 11% of total originations excluding PPP loans for the year and 14% for the fourth quarter. Lending activity on this platform for the fourth quarter included 85 million of residential mortgages along with 50 million of warehouse lines. Our fourth-quarter commercial and industrial loan production increased 2% sequentially. Commitments on the commercial lines of credit increased by 90 million or 13% from the prior quarter to 773 million. However, balances on these lines were relatively stable, resulting in a utilization rate of 39% compared to 44% for the third quarter. Loans and leases originated in the fourth quarter had a weighted average rate of 3.91%, in line with the prior quarter. Although payoff activity moderated in the fourth quarter, the average rate on payoffs of 4.02% increased 84 basis points from the third quarter. Let me speak now to the considerable progress we've made to our corporate Korea initiative. We now have a corporate Korea team in seven strategically located branches across our footprint. As Bonnie explained, more than 14% of our total 2021 loan production, excluding typical loans, was from our corporate Korea growth initiative. Notably, we capped off 2021 in exceptionally strong fashion, contributing more than 18% to our record fourth-quarter loan production. This helped us to comfortably meet our double-digit total loan production growth call for 2021. At year-end, the corporate Korea initiative represented more than 4% of our total loans and 6% of total deposits. With an expanding customer base, we anticipate continued growth from this important initiative in 2022. We remain committed to disciplined underwriting as evidenced by our weighted average loan-to-value and weighted average debt service coverage ratios for our commercial real estate loan portfolio of 49.2% and 1.9x respectively at the end of the fourth quarter. Both metrics were essentially unchanged throughout 2021. As we have said many times, further diversifying our loan portfolio by industry, geography, and loan type remains a priority. At year-end, outstanding loans represented about 15% of our loan portfolio, a decline of more than 1% from the previous quarter and 16% since the end of 2020. Importantly, we have only one outstanding loan or non-accrual totaling 132,000, and it is collateralized by a property in a metro location in Texas. Total deposits were 5.79 billion at the end of the fourth quarter, up 1% from the preceding quarter and 9.7% from year-end 2020. Fourth-quarter deposit growth was driven primarily by a 66 million increase in money market and savings deposits and a 26 million increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. These increases were partially offset by a 42 million decrease in time deposits. As Bonnie noted earlier, DDAs represented 44.5% of our total deposits at the end of 2021, up from 36% at year-end 2020. This substantial improvement in our deposit franchise positions us well for the expected rise in the federal funds rate later this year.
Ron Santarosa, Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Anthony. Our fourth-quarter net interest income decreased 1% from the prior quarter to 49.5 million, and our net interest margin decreased 11 basis points to 2.96%. Interest income on PPP loans was only $100,000 for the fourth quarter, down from 1.6 million for the prior quarter. Adjusting for the effects of PPP loans, our net interest margin contracted four basis points sequentially, as the benefit of lower-cost interest-bearing deposits was more than offset by lower yield on interest-earning assets. However, our net interest income again, excluding the effects of PPP loans, increased 2% sequentially, due primarily to a higher volume of interest-earning assets and the benefit of lower-cost interest-bearing deposits. An important takeaway here is that we now have more than replaced our transient PPP loan portfolio with our own loans originated through our relationship-based banking teams. To illustrate, loans at year-end 2020 were 4.58 billion when excluding the 296 million of PPP loans at that time. For 2021, loans reached 5.15 billion and PPP loans were only 3 million at year-end. Accordingly, for 2021, we increased loans by 564 million, or 12%. Another important takeaway is the improving mix of interest-earning assets arising from a decline in excess liquidity. For the fourth quarter, our average interest-bearing deposits in other banks declined 8% sequentially to 802.9 million. However, this lower-yielding liquid asset ended 2021 at 564.7 million, nearly 30% below the average for the fourth quarter. The shift away from lower-yielding liquid earning assets into higher-yielding loans, combined with 100 million of 5.45% notes redeemable at the end of the 2022 first quarter, should benefit our net interest income and net interest margin in future quarters. Our growth in noninterest-bearing demand accounts moderated to 1% quarter-over-quarter, while quarterly average balances grew 5% sequentially to 2.56 billion. Interest-bearing deposits increased 1% or 30.8 million, while their cost decreased two basis points quarter-over-quarter to 28 basis points for the fourth quarter. Our fourth-quarter noninterest income decreased to 9.3 million from 12.5 million for the third quarter, primarily due to a 2.1 million decrease in gains on the sale of SBA loans. The volume of SBA loans sold in the fourth quarter decreased 24% to 36.6 million, while trade premiums also declined to 10.98% in the fourth quarter compared with 11.85% for the third quarter. Notably, while service charges, fees, and other income declined sequentially, such fees increased 7.5% on the year-ago quarter, driven by the change in our fee schedules mentioned on our last call. We expect these changes, along with management practices over this deposit account service charge activity, to continue to benefit our noninterest income in future quarters. Noninterest expense decreased to 31.6 million for the fourth quarter from 32.5 million for the prior quarter, primarily due to a 1.1 million decline in other operating expenses, largely from lower insurance premiums. Salaries and benefit expenses remained about the same quarter-to-quarter, reflecting commissions and incentives and higher loan production. Our efficiency ratio increased to 53.81% for the fourth quarter from 52.01% for the prior quarter, primarily due to lower interest income on PPP loans and lower fee income due to the decrease in gains on sales of SBA loans. We posted a credit loss expense recovery of 16 million for the fourth quarter, which included a 9.1 million recovery from the first quarter 2020 loan charge-off. Breaking this down further, we posted a 13.4 million negative provision for loan losses, a 2.3 million negative provision for off-balance sheet items, and a 300,000 negative provision for the allowance for losses on accrued interest receivable for current or previously modified loans. With the precipitous decline in modified loans, and the lack of any meaningful adverse credit charges for these loans, the 300,000 negative provision brought an end to this particular allowance. Our allowance for credit losses was 1.41%, or 72.6 million at year-end, while the allowance for losses on off-balance sheet items was 2.6 million. We believe our allowance for credit losses adequately reflects various economic forecasts, as well as the continued near-term uncertainty caused by the lingering effects of the pandemic. We continue to closely monitor and evaluate the evolving environment and will update our loss methodology accordingly. Income tax expense for the fourth quarter included a 2.7 million benefit from the reduction of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance for state net operating loss carryforwards because of recent changes in state income tax regulations that extended their expiration dates. Our effective tax rate for 2021, inclusive of this benefit, was 27.2%. For 2020, our effective tax rate was 29.1%. Finally, our return on average assets and return on average equity for the fourth quarter were 1.93% and 20.89% respectively. For the full year, our return on average assets was 1.51%, and our return on average equity was 16.27%. Our tangible book value increased to 20.79 per share at the end of the fourth quarter, and our tangible common equity ratio remains strong at 9.23%. With that, I'll turn it back to Bonnie.
Bonnie Lee, President and CEO
Thank you, Ron. I am very pleased with our loan production trends, improving asset quality metrics, and strong earnings performance in 2021. I would like to thank the entire Hanmi family for their continued dedication and hard work in making our success possible. Hanmi was founded forty years ago to serve the underbanked minority immigrant community in Los Angeles. Today, we serve multi-ethnic communities across nine states with an expanding array of products and services. While we are proud of our past, we are even more excited about our future. We are a community bank that believes long-term corporate value is derived by investing in the communities we serve. That means being a responsible corporate citizen and serving the best interests of all our stakeholders. To support this, we issued our inaugural environmental, social, and governance report in 2021 to highlight Hanmi's commitments to our stakeholders and to hold ourselves accountable for facilitating financial inclusion while carefully managing risk. You can find the report on our Investor Relations website, and I encourage you to check it out. With that, we will open the call for your questions. Operator, please open the lines to the questions.
Operator, Operator
At this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Matthew Clark with Piper Sandler. Please proceed with your question.
Matthew Clark, Analyst
Maybe a question for Ron to start. It looks like you have some tailwinds from the strong loan growth on an end-period basis relative to the averages should drive, I would think, some favorable remixes in your earning assets and maybe also some lift in the NIM. Would you be willing to maybe take a stab at your thoughts around the kind of the near-term NIM outlook?
Ron Santarosa, Chief Financial Officer
Sure. As you observed, a few loans on a spot basis were about 5% higher than the fourth-quarter average. That's a much larger contributor to our net interest income and NIM. So I would anticipate that we'll be in what I would characterize again as kind of the low threes before introducing any Fed action that might occur in 2022.
Matthew Clark, Analyst
Okay, great. And maybe shifting, well, I'll stick with loans. Payoffs slowed pretty dramatically this quarter. Can you speak to what was driving it? And what your expectations are for payoffs going forward? I know they're hard to forecast, but just curious if that's unusually low or not.
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
Excluding PPP forgiveness, last quarter's payoff level in the third quarter compared to the fourth quarter is in line. So actually, the fourth-quarter payoff is not relatively lower, just not significantly lower. We do expect similar levels of payoff in the year 2022.
Matthew Clark, Analyst
Okay, thank you. And on expenses, Ron, I think there was some modest credit-related kind of expenses in there, but it looks like a pretty clean run rate. What are your thoughts around expense growth this year with wage inflation and all the other investment needs you might have internally?
Ron Santarosa, Chief Financial Officer
So I think we are as perhaps anxious as everyone else to understand where interest rates will go and then just the general demand for labor and the cost of that labor. That said, I would envision maybe starting the year at about that 32 million per quarter run rate. The choice is what kind of inflationary factor to apply to that, and it could be anywhere from, let's say, three to seven, seven on the outside relative to being weighted more for wages, three on the inside, if wages and things of that sort don't come in as strong. Our 2021 expense rate does include higher levels of incentive pay and commission pay relative to loan production. I'm not sure if Anthony is going to set another record here for 2022. But there could be some relief in that number if production were to come in at about the same or maybe a little bit less. Those would be some of the factors I would think about as I look to an expense run rate.
Matthew Clark, Analyst
Okay. And then on the tax rate, a little low this quarter, should we continue to use 30% for the outlook?
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
I think 29% might be better in 2022.
Matthew Clark, Analyst
Okay. And then, lastly, on buybacks, did you guys buy back any stock this quarter?
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
A very small amount at the early -- at the top of the quarter, so about 24,000 shares, and the price back then was probably about 20 dollars a share.
Operator, Operator
Our next question is from Gary Tenner with D.A. Davidson. Please proceed with your question.
Gary Tenner, Analyst
Just a follow-up on that buyback question to start, just kind of false expectations around activity might be in the buyback now that you've obviously had a very strong quarter built tangible book. Where do you think the level of activity might be early in 2023 or early ‘22?
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
Given the volatility that we've all seen here over the last couple of days, my hope, which would be, I guess, counter to a buyback, is that we would see a return to normalcy and the share price continues to be relatively attractive in the marketplace. However, if we continue to be in these doldrums, where we can see some great volatility, I can see entering into the marketplace to acquire something at a pretty low multiple to tangible book.
Gary Tenner, Analyst
Okay, thanks. And then, in terms of SBA, kind of the outlook for 2022. Do you have any kind of budget levels of production and sale that would be helpful to be thinking about going into the year?
Bonnie Lee, President and CEO
Sure. In any given year, I think about the last couple of quarters, we ranged from 25 to 30 to 35 million for 10 quarters around 40 million. Going forward in 2022, I think that we are comfortable providing a range of about 35 million to 40 million in any given quarter.
Gary Tenner, Analyst
Okay. Thank you. And then last question on my end. Actually, just on the service charge income line, Ron, I think pointed out in your prepared remarks that it declined, although it's still well above the year-over-year number. If I recall correctly, you had changed some of your fee levels earlier in 2021, that helped drive that line a bit higher? Have you seen any change in customer behavior as a result that negatively impacted the fourth quarter or just less activity? Just generally, what was the difference there?
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
Yes. So it'd be more business-related customer activity, so nothing negative in that. I look at what we posted for the fourth quarter downward for that line, but you just kind of look at the aggregate for everything outside of gains on sale for SBA, that's probably a pretty good picture of where ROI might be in 2022. With perhaps growth coming from some of the business growth that we might get from certain depositors and the activities that they might get, so I feel pretty good about that contribution.
Gary Tenner, Analyst
Okay, thank you. And then just last question for me. On Slide 10, you break out the personal versus business deposit mix at the end of the year, just wondering if you have the comparable number from your prior.
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
I don't have a specific number, Gary, but it would probably be a little bit more even, 50:50. The increase of business is more from some of the efforts that we described earlier, which is kind of taking root here in 2021.
Operator, Operator
Our next question is from Kelly Motta with KBW. Please proceed with your question.
Kelly Motta, Analyst
Ron, maybe a question for you. I believe in your prepared remarks, you mentioned potentially redeeming some notes at the end of 1Q '22. Is this something we should build into our models? Or is it still something you're toying with as we look to next year?
Ron Santarosa, Chief Financial Officer
We haven't made the final decision. Given the outlook for where interest rates may be, and given where our capital position is, that is probably a likely outcome. I don't see the need in the current marketplace where sub-debt could be 3.5 to 3.75; why would continue with 5.45 even though the price is down to LIBOR.
Kelly Motta, Analyst
Got it. And then, with your -- I appreciate the kind of commentary you gave around NIM. Just wondering with rate hikes lightly on the horizon, how we should be thinking about how your balance sheet performs in the -- with the first couple of hikes given that the deposit base looks quite a bit different than it did going in last cycle.
Ron Santarosa, Chief Financial Officer
Quarterly, we do a net interest income simulation, when we disclose those shocks in our 10-Qs and 10-Ks. We've been in that 5% to 6% range over a 12 month horizon given a 100 basis point shock. If I were to break that down into how life might behave over 90-day periods, the inclination that we have now looking back at the last cycle we went through, when we started raising rates, we noticed that the first 50 basis points coming off a zero interest rate policy was pretty much a non-effect on our deposits. We really saw no movement. But we did capture that 50 notion relative to our loan book. We can debate whether it was 100% or 90%. So I would expect, given the excess liquidity that most institutions have, that we are likely to behave in that manner. But we have to see when we get there. If you remember the last rate cycle, as we went past the first 50, the markets became very anxious that rates were going to continue to move up rapidly. A number of institutions were, in my words, bidding up the price to capture today at lower cost, and that might get into the next 90-day period. So that came about rather quickly as we moved into that next group. The beta is really started to run up faster than normal. Our beta over that whole cycle was about 3%.
Operator, Operator
Our next question is from Jason Stewart with JonesTrading. Please proceed with your question.
Jason Stewart, Analyst
Nice quarter on the origination side. I was hoping you could give us a little bit more color on the commercial real estate origination. I think you mentioned mixed-use in industrial strength. Those tend to be the smaller parts of the portfolio. Any color on the rest of the segment in terms of what drove growth there?
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
Yes. Other than mixed-use and industrial warehouse, we produced about 33 million to 34 million of multifamily loans, which will be our focus for the year 2022.
Jason Stewart, Analyst
Okay. In that 33, 16 of that is warehouse, is that correct?
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
No, I was talking about multifamily. The warehouse line is tied to the mortgage.
Jason Stewart, Analyst
Okay, so that's reported in the 86 million segment?
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
You are right.
Jason Stewart, Analyst
Got you. And then when you're thinking about non-QM loans, how do you think about the duration of those and remind us the overall size of the portfolio that you're targeting there?
Anthony Kim, Chief Banking Officer
Based on my experience and with historical numbers, the average is probably about 3.5 years. With the interest rate environment, we don't expect demand to decrease; the non-QM market is still out there. So we expect to see constant demand.
Operator, Operator
Our next question is from Tim Coffey with Janney. Please proceed with your question.
Tim Coffey, Analyst
Bonnie, I had a question on the loan growth for this year. Can you describe some of the headwinds that would prevent you from duplicating what you did this past year?
Bonnie Lee, President and CEO
Sure. 2021 was a great year, much better than we anticipated at the beginning of last year. We built momentum and we have the platform, we have the relationship managers, we identify target markets. We are fairly confident going into 2022. However, we still have the environment where we still have supply chain issues and labor challenges and whatnot. I think we are projecting about mid to high digit, low single digit loan growth. So in terms of just what all of those community banks are experiencing. Other than that, I think we're in a good spot for this year.
Tim Coffey, Analyst
Okay, great. And then I was wondering about the commercial lines of credit if you had the utilization rates?
Bonnie Lee, President and CEO
Yes, this quarter I think it was --
Ron Santarosa, Chief Financial Officer
It was 39% compared to 44% last quarter. We have reached anywhere between 35 to 45.
Tim Coffey, Analyst
Okay. Do you have the year-ago utilization rate, do you?
Bonnie Lee, President and CEO
Fourth quarter 2020 utilization was 42.7%.
Operator, Operator
Okay. Thank you for the question, Bonnie. I would now turn the call over to Bonnie Lee for closing remarks.
Bonnie Lee, President and CEO
Thank you for participating in our call today. We appreciate your interest in Hanmi and look forward to sharing our continued progress with you throughout the year.
Operator, Operator
This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.