10-K
XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XIFR)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to ________
| Commission<br><br>File<br><br>Number | Exact name of registrant as specified in its<br><br>charter, address of principal executive offices and<br><br>registrant's telephone number | IRS Employer<br><br>Identification<br><br>Number |
|---|---|---|
| 1-36518 | XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP | 30-0818558 |
700 Universe Boulevard
Juno Beach, Florida 33408
(561) 694-4000
State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization: Delaware
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol | Name of exchange<br>on which registered |
|---|---|---|
| Common units | XIFR | New York Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer ☐ Non-Accelerated Filer ☐ Smaller Reporting Company ☐ Emerging Growth Company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes ☐ No þ
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of XPLR Infrastructure, LP held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2025 (based on the closing market price on the Composite Tape on June 30, 2025) was $747,971,110.
Number of XPLR Infrastructure, LP common units outstanding at January 31, 2026: 93,966,346
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
__________________________________
Portions of XPLR Infrastructure, LP's Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Unitholders are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.
Table of Contents
DEFINITIONS
Acronyms and defined terms used in the text include the following:
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ASA | administrative services agreement |
| BLM | U.S. Bureau of Land Management |
| CITC | convertible investment tax credit |
| clean energy tax credits | production tax credits and investment tax credits collectively |
| Code | U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended |
| CSCS agreement | amended and restated cash sweep and credit support agreement |
| FERC | U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
| IDR fee | certain payments from XPLR OpCo to NEE Management as a component of the MSA which are based on the achievement by XPLR OpCo of certain target quarterly distribution levels to its unitholders |
| IPP | independent power producer |
| ITC | investment tax credit |
| limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo | limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo's common units |
| management sub-contract | management services subcontract between NEE Management and NEER |
| Management's Discussion | Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
| MSA | Fifth Amended and Restated Management Services Agreement among XPLR, NEE Management, XPLR OpCo and XPLR OpCo GP |
| MW | megawatt(s) |
| MWh | megawatt-hour(s) |
| NEE | NextEra Energy, Inc. |
| NEECH | NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc. |
| NEE Equity | NextEra Energy Equity Partners, LP |
| NEE Management | NextEra Energy Management Partners, LP |
| NEER | NextEra Energy Resources, LLC |
| NERC | North American Electric Reliability Corporation |
| Note __ | Note __ to consolidated financial statements |
| NYSE | New York Stock Exchange |
| O&M | operations and maintenance |
| PPA | power purchase agreement |
| PTC | production tax credit |
| ROFR | right of first refusal |
| RPS | renewable portfolio standards |
| SEC | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| the board | the board of directors of XPLR |
| U.S. | United States of America |
| XPLR | XPLR Infrastructure, LP |
| XPLR GP | XPLR Infrastructure Partners GP, Inc. |
| XPLR OpCo | XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP |
| XPLR OpCo GP | XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners GP, LLC |
| XPLR OpCo ROFR assets | all assets owned or hereafter acquired by XPLR OpCo or its subsidiaries |
Each of XPLR and XPLR OpCo has subsidiaries and affiliates with names that may include XPLR Infrastructure and similar references. For convenience and simplicity, in this report, the terms XPLR and XPLR OpCo are sometimes used as abbreviated references to specific subsidiaries, affiliates or groups of subsidiaries or affiliates. The precise meaning depends on the context. Discussions of XPLR's ownership of subsidiaries and projects refers to its controlling interest in the general partner of XPLR OpCo and XPLR's indirect interest in and control over the subsidiaries of XPLR OpCo. See Note 1 for a description of the noncontrolling interest in XPLR OpCo. References to XPLR's projects generally include XPLR's consolidated subsidiaries and the projects in which XPLR has equity method investments.
NEE, NEECH and NEER each has subsidiaries and affiliates with names that may include NextEra Energy, NextEra Energy Resources, NextEra and similar references. For convenience and simplicity, in this report the terms NEE, NEECH and NEER are sometimes used as abbreviated references to specific subsidiaries, affiliates or groups of subsidiaries or affiliates. The precise meaning depends on the context.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page No. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Definitions | 2 | |
| Forward-Looking Statements | 3 | |
| PART I | ||
| Item 1. | Business | 4 |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 10 |
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 26 |
| Item 1C. | Cybersecurity | 26 |
| Item 2. | Properties | 27 |
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 27 |
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 27 |
| PART II | ||
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 28 |
| Item 6. | Reserved | 29 |
| Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 30 |
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 40 |
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 41 |
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 75 |
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 75 |
| Item 9B. | Other Information | 75 |
| Item 9C. | Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections | 75 |
| PART III | ||
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 76 |
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 76 |
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Unitholder Matters | 76 |
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 76 |
| Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 76 |
| PART IV | ||
| Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 77 |
| Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary | 79 |
| Signatures | 80 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Any statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, strategies, future events or performance (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as may result, are expected to, will continue, anticipate, believe, will, could, should, would, estimated, may, plan, potential, future, projection, goals, target, outlook, predict and intend or words of similar meaning) are not statements of historical facts and may be forward looking. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties. Accordingly, any such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, important factors included in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors (in addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements) that could have a significant impact on XPLR's operations and financial results, and could cause XPLR's actual results to differ materially from those contained or implied in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of XPLR in this Form 10-K, in presentations, on its website, in response to questions or otherwise.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and XPLR undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances, including, but not limited to, unanticipated events, after the date on which such statement is made, unless otherwise required by law. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained or implied in any forward-looking statement.
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business
XPLR, through its ownership in XPLR OpCo, has a partial ownership interest in a clean energy infrastructure portfolio in the U.S. with approximately 10 gigawatts of net generating capacity in 28 states as of December 31, 2025 and is one of the largest generators of energy from the wind and sun in the U.S. based on 2025 MWh produced on a net generation basis. XPLR's portfolio is diversified across generation technologies including wind, solar and battery storage projects.
XPLR believes anticipated long-term growth in U.S. electricity demand will create opportunities for XPLR to invest in its existing portfolio, including through additional investments in renewable energy repowering projects and co-located battery storage and through renewing, extending or recontracting existing PPAs. XPLR also plans to pursue investment opportunities in areas adjacent to its existing clean energy projects, with a focus on assets that are expected to provide incremental cash flows and opportunities for growth. XPLR believes its cash flow profile, geographic, technological and resource diversity, operational excellence, contractual relationships with NEE and disciplined approach to capital allocation provide XPLR with a competitive advantage and position XPLR well to take advantage of opportunities in the growing U.S. power sector.
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND PORTFOLIO
XPLR is a limited partnership. At December 31, 2025, XPLR owned a controlling, non-economic general partner interest and an approximately 48.8% limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo. Through XPLR OpCo, XPLR has a partial ownership interest in a portfolio of contracted clean energy assets consisting of wind, solar and solar-plus-storage projects and a stand-alone battery storage project.
The following diagram depicts XPLR's simplified ownership structure:

(a) At December 31, 2025, NEE owns 2,337,882 XPLR common units.
(b) At December 31, 2025, NEE Equity owns approximately 51.2% of XPLR OpCo's common units representing limited partnership interests and 100% of XPLR OpCo's Class P units. NEE Equity may tender its XPLR OpCo common units and in exchange receive XPLR common units on a one-for-one basis, or the value of such common units in cash, subject to the terms of an exchange agreement.
(c) At December 31, 2025, certain project entities are subject to noncontrolling interests. See Note 2 – Noncontrolling Interests.
Table of Contents
Clean energy projects – At December 31, 2025, XPLR owned interests in a portfolio of contracted clean energy projects located in 28 states as summarized below:
| Technology | Net MW(a) | Contract Expiration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | 8,069 | 2026 – 2051 | |
| Solar | 1,718 | 2035 – 2051 | |
| Battery Storage | 274 | 2037 – 2051 | |
| 10,061 | (b) |
____________________
(a) MWs reflect XPLR OpCo's net ownership in the clean energy project capacity based on respective ownership interests. XPLR OpCo has indirect equity method investments in projects with a net generating capacity of approximately 790 MW with ownership interests ranging from 33.3% to 50%. Additionally, XPLR OpCo has indirect controlling ownership interests ranging from 49% to 67% in projects with a net generating capacity of approximately 2,087 MW and battery storage capacity of 244 MW. See Note 2 – Investments in Unconsolidated Entities and – Noncontrolling Interests.
(b) Third-party investors own Class B noncontrolling membership interests in the XPLR subsidiaries that own interests in projects with net generating capacity of approximately 4,427 MW and battery storage capacity of 120 MW. Third-party investors own differential membership interests in projects with net generating capacity of approximately 5,736 MW and battery storage capacity of 274 MW. See Note 2 – Noncontrolling Interests, Note 11 and Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests. Projects with net generating capacity of approximately 3,221 MW are encumbered by liens against their assets securing various financings.
During 2025, XPLR OpCo generated approximately 26.0 million MWh and 4.0 million MWh from wind and solar generation facilities, respectively, and discharged 0.4 million MWh from its battery storage projects. During 2024, XPLR OpCo generated approximately 27.0 million MWh and 4.0 million MWh from wind and solar generation facilities, respectively, and discharged 0.2 million MWh from its battery storage projects.
Discontinued operations – In September 2025, indirect subsidiaries of XPLR completed the sale of their ownership interests in Meade Pipeline Co, LLC (Meade), which owned an investment in natural gas pipeline assets in Pennsylvania (Meade pipeline investment). In December 2023, XPLR sold its interests in a portfolio of seven natural gas pipelines assets in Texas (Texas pipelines). See Note 4.
Table of Contents
The following map shows XPLR's ownership interests in clean energy projects in operation.

Each of the clean energy projects sells the majority of its output and related renewable energy attributes pursuant to long-term, fixed price PPAs to various counterparties. In 2025, XPLR derived approximately 14% and 15% of its consolidated revenues from its contracts with Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company, respectively. See Item 1A for a discussion of risks related to XPLR's counterparties.
XPLR, XPLR OpCo and XPLR OpCo GP are parties to the MSA with an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NEE, under which operational, management and administrative services are provided to XPLR under the direction of the board, including managing XPLR’s day-to-day affairs and providing individuals to act as XPLR’s executive officers, in addition to those services that are provided under O&M agreements and ASAs between NEER subsidiaries and XPLR subsidiaries. XPLR OpCo pays NEE a management fee pursuant to the terms of the MSA. The MSA continues until January 1, 2068 and thereafter renews for successive five-year periods, subject to certain termination rights of XPLR OpCo and NEE Management pursuant to the terms of the MSA. The O&M agreements and ASAs have initial terms ranging between 20 to 30 years and will each be automatically extended for an additional five-year period subject to certain termination rights pursuant to the respective agreement. See Note 15 – Management Services Agreement.
XPLR and XPLR OpCo are parties to a ROFR agreement with NEER granting NEER and its subsidiaries (other than XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries) a right of first refusal on any proposed sale of any XPLR OpCo ROFR assets. Pursuant to the terms of the ROFR agreement, prior to engaging in any negotiation regarding any sale of a XPLR OpCo ROFR asset, XPLR OpCo must first negotiate with NEER to attempt to reach an agreement on a sale of such asset to NEER or any of its subsidiaries. This negotiation with NEER and its subsidiaries could occur over two separate 30-day periods, by the end of which, if NEER and XPLR OpCo have not reached an agreement, XPLR OpCo will have the right to sell such asset to a third party.
Table of Contents
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Energy Industry
U.S. electric power demand is expected to undergo long-term secular growth due in part to data centers, onshoring of manufacturing and electrification of industry, which XPLR expects will increase demand for clean energy. The expected need for electric power will require utilities and other wholesale end users to look to new electricity generation across a wide range of energy generating options including renewable and other clean energy sources, such as battery storage, natural gas-fired generation and other adjacent and complementary infrastructure. XPLR believes this will create a variety of opportunities at its existing portfolio as well as other adjacent investment opportunities.
Policy Incentives
U.S. federal, state and local governments have established various incentives to support the development of clean energy projects. These incentives include accelerated tax depreciation, PTCs, ITCs, cash grants, tax abatements and RPS programs. Pursuant to the U.S. federal Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS), wind and solar generation facilities are depreciated for tax purposes over a five-year period even though the useful life of such facilities is generally much longer than five years.
Owners of wind and solar facilities are eligible to claim an income tax credit (the PTC, or an ITC in lieu of the PTC) upon initially achieving commercial operation. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) modified several pre-existing provisions, including the phase out of these income tax credits, of the Inflation Reduction Act and other laws. Wind and solar generation facilities are eligible for 100% PTC or 30% ITC if such facilities begin construction before July 5, 2026 or are placed in service by December 31, 2027. The PTC is determined based on the amount of electricity produced by the facility during the first ten years of commercial operation. A facility must also meet certain labor requirements to qualify for the 100% PTC or 30% ITC rate or construction must have started on the facility before January 29, 2023. In addition, the PTC is increased by 10% and the ITC rate is increased by 10 percentage points for facilities that satisfy certain tax credit enhancement requirements. Retrofitted wind and solar generation facilities may qualify for a PTC or an ITC if the cost basis of the new investment is at least 80% of the retrofitted facility’s total fair value.
In addition, the 30% ITC, subject to a phase-down in 2034 and 2035, applies to energy storage projects placed in service after 2022 that begin construction by December 31, 2033 (no eligibility for projects that begin construction after 2035). These projects are subject to the same labor requirements and credit enhancements applicable to wind and solar facilities (discussed above).
XPLR and the wind and solar industries have relied on the settled understanding of the term "begin construction" as informed by longstanding Treasury Department guidance regarding what constitutes the "beginning of construction" for purposes of claiming clean energy tax credits. On August 15, 2025, the Internal Revenue Service issued new guidance for the purpose of determining whether wind and solar facilities "begin construction" before July 5, 2026 such that they are not subject to the December 31, 2027 placed in service requirement. The new guidance applies to wind and solar facilities that begin construction on or after September 2, 2025, with prior guidance applying before that. The new guidance is substantially similar to the prior guidance except that it eliminates the 5% spend test safe harbor as a method to begin construction, such that wind and solar facilities must begin construction by starting physical work of a significant nature. Physical work of a significant nature includes onsite work other than preliminary activities, and offsite work on non-inventory equipment performed by a third-party manufacturer under a binding written contract. The new guidance also retains the "continuity requirement" from prior guidance, as well as the continuity safe harbor that deems the continuity requirement as satisfied if the related facility is placed in service no more than four years after the year it began construction. There will be no clean energy tax credits for wind or solar facilities placed in service after 2030.
All projects discussed above that begin construction after December 31, 2025 must satisfy the prohibited foreign entity material assistance requirements under the OBBBA in order to be eligible for tax credits.
Clean energy tax credits can be transferred to an unrelated purchaser for cash, providing an additional path, along with sales of differential membership interests, for developers to monetize the value of the clean energy tax credits.
The foregoing incentives have the effect of making the development of renewable energy projects more competitive. A loss of, or reduction in, the foregoing incentives could decrease the attractiveness of renewable energy projects to developers.
Regulation
XPLR's projects, including projects under development, are subject to regulation by a number of U.S. federal, state and other organizations, including, but not limited to, the following:
•the FERC, which oversees the acquisition and disposition of electric generation, transmission and other facilities, transmission of electricity in interstate commerce and wholesale purchases and sales of electric energy, among other things;
Table of Contents
•the NERC, which, through its regional entities, establishes and enforces mandatory reliability standards, subject to approval by the FERC, to ensure the reliability of the U.S. electric transmission and generation system and to prevent major system blackouts; and
•the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which has the responsibility to maintain and enforce national standards under a variety of environmental laws, and in some cases delegates authority to state agencies. The EPA also works with industries and all levels of government, including U.S. federal and state governments, in a wide variety of voluntary pollution prevention programs and energy conservation efforts.
U.S. federal, state and local governments have established extensive approvals and permitting requirements for items such as disturbing wetlands, obtaining no hazard determinations from the Federal Aviation Administration, interacting with wildlife, making wholesale sales of electricity, and other clearances. These requirements may change from time to time. A number of regulatory actions occurred in 2025, including, among others, a federal executive order that calls for a pause in federal land leasing, permitting and approvals for wind development facilities pending completion of a review of the federal rules providing for leasing, permitting and approvals for wind projects and the FERC approval of proposals by regional transmission operators regarding the process for interconnecting new generation projects to certain regional transmission grids. These or similar initiatives could limit XPLR's and its subsidiaries' ability, and the ability of third parties with which XPLR contracts, to obtain or renew necessary approvals, rights-of-way, permits, leases or loans for wind or other clean energy projects.
In addition, XPLR is also subject to environmental laws and regulations described in the Environmental Matters section below.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
XPLR's primary business objective is to deliver value to common unitholders which it plans to do over time by allocating the cash flows generated by its assets toward selected clean energy investments. These investments may include organic growth opportunities at existing assets, as well as selective acquisitions of ownership interests in clean energy projects or other investments. To achieve this objective, XPLR intends to execute the following business strategy:
•Invest cash generated by existing assets to enhance long-term value. Among other uses, XPLR and XPLR OpCo intend to use retained cash to repower renewable energy projects, which would extend the life of their existing assets, enhance operations and provide attractive returns, and to invest in co-located battery storage projects. XPLR also intends to use cash to exercise buyout rights relating to Class B noncontrolling members' interests under certain limited liability company agreements to which XPLR and certain of its subsidiaries is a party (see Note 2 – Noncontrolling Interests and Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests).
•Focus ancillary investments on areas where XPLR expects to generate attractive returns. XPLR continually evaluates investment opportunities in areas adjacent to its existing clean energy portfolio and their potential to generate attractive returns. Geographically, XPLR intends to focus its investments in the U.S., where it believes industry trends present significant investment opportunities, including acquisitions of clean energy assets in various regions and favorable locations where power demand growth is expected.
•Deliver long-term value to common unitholders through disciplined capital allocation. XPLR's capital allocation strategy seeks to enhance the long-term value of its portfolio on behalf of common unitholders. XPLR's capital allocation strategy will measure its investment opportunities for both organic growth and ancillary opportunities against returning capital to common unitholders over time.
•Maintain a sound capital structure and financial flexibility. Maintaining a sound capital structure is expected to allow XPLR capital allocation flexibility and support access to diverse sources of capital. XPLR and its subsidiaries have utilized various financing structures including limited-recourse project-level financings, the sale of differential membership interests and equity interests in certain subsidiaries, convertible preferred units, convertible senior unsecured notes and senior unsecured notes, as well as revolving credit facilities and term loans.
•Utilize NEER’s operational excellence to maintain the value of the projects in XPLR's portfolio. NEER provides O&M, administrative and management services to XPLR's projects pursuant to the MSA and other agreements. Through these agreements, XPLR benefits from the operational expertise that NEER currently provides across its entire portfolio. XPLR expects that these services will maximize the operational efficiencies of its portfolio.
Table of Contents
COMPETITION
Wholesale power generation is a capital-intensive, commodity-driven business with numerous industry participants. While the majority of XPLR's existing projects are currently contracted, XPLR may compete in the future primarily on the basis of price and terms. XPLR also believes the clean attributes of XPLR's generation assets, among other strengths discussed below, are competitive advantages. Wholesale power generation is a regional business that is highly fragmented relative to many other commodity industries and diverse in terms of industry structure. As such, there is a wide variation in terms of the capabilities, resources, nature and identity of the companies XPLR competes with depending on the market. In wholesale and merchant markets, customers' needs are met through a variety of means, including long-term bilateral contracts, standardized bilateral products such as full requirements service and customized supply and risk management services.
In addition, when seeking to add new generation, XPLR competes with other companies to acquire projects. XPLR believes its primary competitors for opportunities in the U.S. are regulated utility holding companies, developers, IPPs, pension funds and private equity funds.
XPLR believes that it is well-positioned to execute its strategy and deliver value to its common unitholders and customers over the long term based on the following competitive strengths:
Contracted projects with stable cash flows. The clean energy projects in XPLR's portfolio are contracted with a diverse group of customers under long-term PPAs that generally provide for fixed price payments over the contract term. The clean energy projects have a total weighted average remaining contract term of approximately 12 years at December 31, 2025 based on forecasted contributions to earnings. The expected stable cash flows generated by XPLR's portfolio of clean energy projects support access to diverse sources of financing and can be deployed towards investments as well as potential return of capital to common unitholders.
Geographic and resource diversification. XPLR's portfolio is geographically diverse across the U.S. In addition, XPLR's portfolio consists of wind and solar generation facilities, solar-plus-storage projects and a stand-alone battery storage project. A diverse portfolio tends to reduce the magnitude of individual project or regional deviations from historical resource conditions, providing a more stable stream of cash flows over the long term than a non-diversified portfolio. In addition, XPLR believes the geographic diversity of its portfolio helps minimize the impact of adverse regulatory conditions in particular jurisdictions.
Organic growth opportunities at XPLR's existing assets. XPLR has organic reinvestment opportunities across its existing portfolio through renewable energy repowering that could provide additional value to customers and are expected to produce attractive returns for XPLR. XPLR expects the repowering projects that it pursues will allow XPLR to refresh and enhance the performance and extend the expected life of the wind turbine equipment as well as start a new 10 years of PTCs.
NEE management and operational expertise. XPLR believes it benefits from NEE’s experience, operational excellence and cost-efficient operations. Through the MSA and other agreements with NEE and its subsidiaries, XPLR's projects will receive the same benefits and expertise that NEE currently provides across its entire portfolio. XPLR also seeks to take advantage of incremental investment opportunities enabled by NEE's long-standing industry and customer relationships, knowledge and experience.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
XPLR is subject to environmental laws and regulations, including extensive U.S. federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations relating to, among others, air quality, water quality and usage, waste management, wildlife protection and historical resources, for the ongoing operations, siting and construction of its facilities. The environmental laws in the U.S., including, among others, the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA), provide for the protection of numerous species, including endangered species and/or their habitats, migratory birds, bats and eagles. Complying with these environmental laws and regulations could result in, among other things, changes in the design and operation of, and additional costs associated with, existing facilities and changes or delays in the location, design, construction and operation of any new facilities and failure to comply could result in fines, penalties, criminal sanctions or injunctions.
HUMAN CAPITAL
XPLR does not have any employees and relies solely on employees of affiliates of the manager under the MSA, including employees of NEE and NEER, to serve as officers of XPLR. See further discussion of the MSA and other payments to NEE in Note 15.
WEBSITE ACCESS TO SEC FILINGS
XPLR makes its SEC filings, including the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8‑K, and any amendments to those reports, available free of charge on XPLR's internet website, www.xplrinfrastructure.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after those documents are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information and materials available on XPLR's website (or any of its subsidiaries' or affiliates' websites) are not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Limited partnerships and limited partnership interests are inherently different than corporations and shares of capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business risks to which XPLR is subject are similar to those that would be faced by a corporation engaged in similar businesses and XPLR has elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If any of the following risks were to occur, and whether or not expressly stated with respect to any particular risk factor, XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of XPLR's common units could decline and investors could lose all or part of their investment in XPLR.
Performance Risks
XPLR's business and results of operations are affected by the performance of its renewable energy projects which could be impacted by wind and solar conditions and in certain circumstances by market prices for power.
The output from XPLR's wind projects can vary greatly as local wind speeds and other conditions vary. Similarly, the amount of energy that a solar project is able to produce depends on several factors, including the amount of solar energy that reaches its solar panels. Wind turbine or solar panel placement, interference from nearby wind projects or other structures and the effects of vegetation, snow, ice, land use and terrain also affect the amount of energy that XPLR's wind and solar projects generate. In certain circumstances, XPLR is exposed to the inherent power market price risk created by the differences in pricing between commodity selling and purchasing locations known as basis risk. The failure of some or all of XPLR's projects to perform according to XPLR's expectations as well as basis risk could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Operation and maintenance of renewable energy projects, battery storage projects and other facilities involve significant risks that could result in unplanned power outages, reduced output or capacity, property damage, environmental pollution, personal injury or loss of life.
There are risks associated with the operation and maintenance of XPLR's renewable energy projects, battery storage projects and other facilities , including:
•risks associated with facility start-up operations, such as whether the facility will achieve projected operating performance on schedule and otherwise as planned;
•breakdown or failure of, or damage to, turbines, blades, blade attachments, solar panels, mirrors, batteries and other equipment whether as a result of leaks, fires, explosions, mechanical problems or other events or otherwise, which could reduce a project’s energy output or result in unplanned power outages, significant property damage, environmental pollution, personal injury or loss of life;
•catastrophic events, such as wildfires, earthquakes, hurricanes, severe weather, tornadoes, ice and hailstorms, extreme temperatures, icing events, floods, severe convective storms and droughts, other meteorological conditions, landslides and other similar events beyond XPLR's control, which could severely damage or destroy all or a part of a project, or interconnection and transmission facilities, reduce its energy output or capacity, or result in unplanned power outages, property damage, environmental pollution, personal injury or loss of life;
•technical performance below expected levels, including, but not limited to, the failure of wind turbines, solar panels, mirrors, batteries and other equipment to produce energy as expected due to incorrect measures of expected performance provided by equipment suppliers;
•interference from nearby wind projects or other structures;
•increases in the cost of operating the projects;
•operator, contractor or supplier error or failure to perform or to fulfill any warranty obligations;
•serial design, manufacturing or other defects, which may not be covered by warranties or performance guarantees;
•inability to anticipate or adapt to changes in the reliability of XPLR's or NEE's equipment, operating systems or facilities;
•extended events, including, but not limited to, force majeure under certain PPAs that may give rise to a termination right of the customer under such a PPA (renewable energy counterparty);
•failure to comply with permits and the inability to renew or replace permits that have expired or terminated;
•the inability to operate within limitations that may be imposed by current or future governmental permits;
•replacements for failed equipment, which may need to meet new interconnection standards or require system impact studies and compliance that may be difficult or expensive to achieve;
•land use, environmental or other regulatory requirements;
•risks associated with potential harm to wildlife;
•disputes with the BLM, other owners of land on which XPLR's projects are located or nearby landowners;
•changes in laws, regulations, policies and treaties;
•government or utility exercise of eminent domain power or similar events;
•existence of liens, encumbrances and other imperfections in title affecting real estate interests; and
•insufficient insurance, warranties or performance guarantees to cover any or all lost revenues or increased expenses from the foregoing.
These and other factors could require the shutdown of XPLR's renewable energy projects, battery storage projects or other facilities. For renewable energy projects, battery storage projects or other facilities located near populated areas, including, but not limited to, residential areas, commercial business centers, industrial sites and other public gathering areas, or areas more prone to wildfires, the level of damage resulting from certain of these risks could be greater.
These factors could also reduce the useful lives of and degrade equipment, interconnection facilities and transmission facilities, and materially increase maintenance and other costs. Unanticipated costs associated with maintaining or repairing XPLR's projects may reduce profitability. In addition, replacement and spare parts for solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and other key equipment may be difficult or costly to acquire or may be unavailable.
Such events or actions could significantly decrease or eliminate the revenues of a project, significantly increase its operating costs, cause a default under XPLR's financing agreements or give rise to damages or penalties payable to a PPA , another contractual counterparty, a governmental authority or other third parties or cause defaults under related contracts or permits. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects can be materially adversely affected by weather conditions and related impacts, including, but not limited to, the impact of severe weather.
Weather conditions directly influence the demand for electricity and other fuels and affect the price of energy and energy-related commodities. In addition, severe weather and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, droughts, extreme temperatures, icing events, wildfires, severe convective storms and earthquakes, can be destructive and cause power outages, personal injury and property damage, reduce revenue, affect the availability of fuel
Table of Contents
and water and require XPLR to incur additional costs to, for example, restore service and repair damaged facilities, obtain replacement power, access available financing sources, obtain insurance, pay for any associated injuries and damages and fund any associated legal matters and compliance penalties. Furthermore, XPLR's physical plants could be placed at greater risk of damage should there be unusual variations in temperature and weather patterns, resulting in more intense, frequent and extreme weather events and abnormal levels of precipitation. A disruption or failure of electric generation, storage, transmission or distribution systems in the event of a hurricane, tornado or other severe weather event, or otherwise, could prevent XPLR from operating its business in the normal course and could result in any of the adverse consequences described above. Additionally, the actions taken to address the potential for severe weather such as additional winterizing of critical equipment and infrastructure, modifying or alternating plant operations and expanding load shedding options could result in significant increases in costs. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Changes in weather can also affect the level of wind and solar resource available, and thus the production of electricity, at XPLR's power generation facilities. Because the levels of wind and solar resources are variable and difficult to predict, XPLR’s results of operations for individual wind and solar facilities specifically, and XPLR's results of operations generally, may vary significantly from period to period, depending on the level of available resources. To the extent that resources are not available at planned levels, the financial results from these facilities may be less than expected.
XPLR depends on certain of the renewable energy projects in its portfolio for a substantial portion of its anticipated cash flows.
XPLR depends on certain of the renewable energy projects in its portfolio for a substantial portion of its anticipated cash flows. Consequently, the impairment or loss of any one or more of those projects could materially and, depending on the relative size of the affected projects, disproportionately reduce XPLR’s cash flows and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to execute its business plan.
Developing and investing in power and related infrastructure, including repowering of XPLR's existing renewable energy projects, requires up-front capital and other expenditures and could expose XPLR to project development risks, as well as financing expense.
XPLR expects to pursue repowering of its existing renewable energy projects and may pursue other development opportunities. Repowering and development of assets involve regulatory, environmental, construction, safety, political and legal uncertainties and may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital. These projects may not be completed on schedule, at the budgeted cost or at all. There may be cost overruns and construction difficulties. In addition, XPLR may be required to pay liquidated damages to counterparties if a project does not achieve commercial operations before a specified date that the parties have agreed or may agree upon in advance. Any cost overruns XPLR experiences or liquidated damages XPLR pays could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan. In addition, XPLR may choose to finance all or a portion of the development costs of any repowering or development project through the sale of additional common units or securities convertible into, or settleable with, common units, which could result in dilution to XPLR’s unitholders, or through other financings which could result in additional expense. Any such financings could involve the issuance of securities or indebtedness that could be senior to the common units upon liquidation. The development and construction related to repowering projects and other development projects may occur over an extended period of time and XPLR may not receive increases in revenues until the projects are placed in service, or at all. Accordingly, XPLR's repowering and other development efforts may not result in additional long-term contracted revenue streams that increase, and could decrease, the amount of cash available to execute XPLR's business plan.
Threats of terrorism and catastrophic events that could result from geopolitical factors, terrorism, cyberattacks, or individuals and/or groups attempting to disrupt XPLR’s business, or the businesses of third parties, may materially adversely affect XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR is subject to the potentially adverse operating and financial effects of geopolitical factors, terrorist acts and threats, cyberattacks and other disruptive activities of individuals or groups. There have been cyberattacks and other physical attacks within the energy industry on energy infrastructure such as substations and related assets in the past and there may be such attacks in the future. In addition, the advancement of artificial intelligence has given rise to added vulnerabilities and potential entry points for cyberattacks. XPLR’s generation, transmission, storage and distribution facilities, information technology systems and other infrastructure facilities and systems could be direct targets of, or otherwise be materially adversely affected by, such activities.
Geopolitical factors, terrorist acts, cyberattacks or other similar events affecting XPLR’s or NEE's systems and facilities, or those of third parties on which XPLR relies, could harm XPLR’s business by, for example, limiting their ability to generate, purchase, store or transmit power or other energy-related commodities, limiting their ability to bill customers and collect and process payments, and delaying their development and construction of new generation, distribution, storage or transmission facilities or capital improvements to existing facilities. These events, and governmental actions in response, could result in a material decrease in revenues, significant additional costs (for example, to repair assets, implement additional security requirements or maintain or acquire insurance), significant fines and penalties, and reputational damage, could materially adversely affect XPLR’s operations (for example, by contributing to disruption of supplies), and could impair XPLR’s ability to raise capital (for example, by contributing to financial instability and lower economic activity). In addition, the implementation of security guidelines and measures has resulted in and is expected to continue to result in increased costs. To the extent geopolitical factors, terrorist acts, cyberattacks or other similar events equate to a force majeure event under XPLR's PPAs, the renewable energy counterparty may terminate such PPAs if such a force majeure event continues for a specified period. Such events or actions may materially adversely affect XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
The ability of XPLR to obtain insurance and the terms of any available insurance coverage could be materially adversely affected by international, national, state or local events and company-specific events at XPLR or NEE, as well as the financial condition of insurers. XPLR's insurance coverage does not provide protection against all significant losses.
XPLR shares insurance coverage with NEE and its affiliates, for which XPLR reimburses NEE. NEE currently maintains liability insurance coverage for itself and its affiliates, including XPLR, which covers legal and contractual liabilities arising out of bodily injury, personal injury or property damage to third parties. NEE also maintains coverage for itself and its affiliates, including XPLR, for physical damage to assets and resulting business interruption, including, but not limited to, damage caused by terrorist acts. However, such policies do not cover all potential losses and coverage is not always available in the insurance market on commercially reasonable terms. To the extent NEE or any of its affiliates experience covered losses under the insurance policies, the limit of XPLR's coverage for potential losses may be decreased. NEE may also reduce or eliminate such coverage at any time. XPLR may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount XPLR desires at reasonable rates and XPLR may elect to self-insure some of its wind and solar projects. The ability of NEE to obtain insurance and the terms of any available insurance coverage could be materially adversely affected by international, national, state or local events and company-specific events at XPLR or NEE, as well as the financial condition of insurers. If XPLR cannot or does not obtain insurance coverage, XPLR may be required to pay costs associated with adverse future events. A loss for which XPLR is not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Table of Contents
XPLR relies on interconnection and transmission of third parties to deliver energy from certain of its projects. If these facilities become unavailable, XPLR's projects may not be able to operate or deliver energy.
XPLR depends on interconnection and transmission facilities owned and operated by third parties to deliver energy from certain of its projects. In addition, some of the projects in XPLR's portfolio share essential facilities, including interconnection and transmission facilities, with projects that are owned by other affiliates of NEE. If the interconnection or transmission arrangement for a project is terminated, XPLR may not be able to replace it on similar terms to the existing arrangement, or at all, or XPLR may experience significant delays or costs in connection with such replacement. Because XPLR does not own these third-party facilities, their continuing operations are not within its control. The unavailability of interconnection, transmission or shared facilities due to reasons such as geopolitical factors, cyber incidents, physical attacks, severe weather or a generation, storage or transmission facility outage, or sudden and significant increase or decrease in wind or solar generation could adversely affect the operation of XPLR's projects and the revenues received, which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's business is subject to liabilities and operating restrictions arising from environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and other standards, compliance with which may require significant capital expenditures, increase XPLR’s cost of operations and affect or limit its business plans.
XPLR's projects are subject to numerous domestic environmental, health and safety laws, regulations, guidelines, policies, directives and other requirements governing or relating to the protection of avian, bats and other wildlife mortality and habitat protection; the storage, handling, use and transportation of hazardous or toxic substances and other regulated substances, materials, and/or chemicals; air quality, water quality and usage, soil quality, releases of hazardous materials into the environment and the prevention of and responses to releases of hazardous materials into soil and groundwater; greenhouse gas emissions; waste management; U.S. federal, state or local land use, zoning, building and transportation laws and requirements; the presence or discovery of archaeological, religious or cultural resources at or near XPLR's projects; fire prevention; and the protection of workers’ health and safety, among other things. If XPLR's projects do not comply with such laws, regulations, environmental licenses, permits, inspections or other requirements, XPLR may be required to incur significant expenditures, pay penalties or fines, or curtail or cease operations of the affected projects, prevent or delay the development of power generation, storage and transmission or other development projects, limit the availability and use of some fuels required for the production of electricity and may also be subject to criminal sanctions or injunctions, such as restrictions on how it operates its facilities. XPLR's projects also carry inherent environmental, health and safety risks, including, without limitation, the potential for related civil litigation, regulatory compliance actions, remediation orders, fines and other penalties. Proceedings related to any such litigation or actions could result in significant expenditures as well as the restriction or elimination of the ability to operate any affected project. For example, if XPLR fails to obtain eagle "take" permits under the BGEPA or incidental take permits under the ESA for certain of its wind facilities and eagles or listed species, like cave bats, perish in collisions with facility turbines, XPLR or its subsidiaries could face criminal prosecution under these laws.
Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and other standards have generally become more stringent over time and this trend could continue. Significant capital and operating costs may be incurred at any time to keep XPLR's projects in compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and other standards, including in response to any addition of species, such as additional bat species, to the endangered species list. If it is not economical to make those expenditures, or if XPLR's projects violate any of these current or future laws and regulations, it may be necessary to retire the affected project or restrict or modify its operations, including restrictions on how XPLR develops, sites and operates projects, which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan could be materially adversely affected by new or revised laws, regulations or executive orders, as well as by regulatory action or inaction.
XPLR’s business could be materially adversely affected by a variety of legal activity, such as: 1) the adoption of new or revised laws, such as international trade laws, regulations and interpretations; 2) regulatory initiatives such as those seeking restructuring of the energy industry; 3) new or revised regulations such as those affecting emissions, water consumption, water discharges, wetlands, and environmental and other permitting requirements for energy infrastructure projects; 4) actions taken, or not taken, by government agencies as a result of executive orders, such as failing to issue, delaying the issuance of, or increasing the requirements necessary to obtain approvals, rights-of-way, permits, determinations, leases or loans related to wind or other clean energy projects; and 5) changes in the way government interprets or applies laws, regulations or orders. Changes in the nature of the regulation of XPLR’s business through this type or other types of legal activity, such as the repeal, revocation, or reversal of existing laws, regulations or actions, could have a material adverse effect on XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan. XPLR is unable to predict future legislative, regulatory or executive action or inaction, including through changed government interpretations or applications, although any such changes may increase costs, the challenges associated with developing and operating clean and other energy infrastructure projects, and competitive pressures on XPLR, which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR is subject to FERC rules related to transmission that are designed to facilitate competition in the wholesale market on practically a nationwide basis and that evolve over time. XPLR cannot predict the impact of changing FERC rules or policies of the regional transmission organizations and independent system operators, such as existing or potential future rules governing economic dispatch, generator and load interconnection procedures, transmission planning requirements, cost allocation methodologies and cost recovery policies, or the effect of changes in levels of wholesale supply and demand, which are typically driven by factors beyond XPLR's control. There can be no assurance that XPLR will be able to respond adequately to such rules and developments, which may impact the ability, timeline and cost to interconnect new or repowered energy projects to the transmission system and the availability of transmission system capacity to deliver energy products to market, or to any changes that reverse or restrict the competitive restructuring of the energy industry in those jurisdictions in which such restructuring has occurred. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's projects and PPA counterparties are subject to regulation by U.S. federal, state and local authorities. The wholesale sale of electric energy in the continental U.S., other than portions of Texas, is subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC and the ability of a project to charge the negotiated rates contained in its PPA is subject to that project’s maintenance of its general authorization from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. The FERC may impose penalties or revoke a project's market-based rate authorization if it determines that the project entity can exercise market power in transmission or generation, creates barriers to entry, has engaged in abusive affiliate transactions or fails to meet compliance requirements associated with such rates. The negotiated rates entered into under PPAs could be changed by the FERC if it determines such change is in the public interest or just and reasonable, depending on the standard in the respective PPA. If the FERC decreases the prices paid to XPLR for energy delivered under any of its PPAs, XPLR’s revenues could be below its projections and its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan could be materially adversely affected.
XPLR's clean energy projects are subject to the mandatory reliability standards of the NERC. The NERC reliability standards are a series of requirements that relate to maintaining the reliability of the North American bulk electric system and cover a wide variety of topics, including, but not limited to, physical and cybersecurity of critical assets, information protocols, frequency response and voltage standards, testing, documentation and outage management. If
Table of Contents
XPLR fails to comply with these standards, XPLR could be subject to sanctions, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary penalties. Although the projects are not subject to state utility rate regulation because they sell energy exclusively on a wholesale basis, XPLR is subject to other state regulations that may affect XPLR's projects’ sale of energy and operations. Changes in state regulatory treatment are unpredictable and could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
The structure of the energy industry and regulation in the U.S. is currently, and may continue to be, subject to challenges and restructuring proposals. Additional regulatory approvals may be required due to changes in law or for other reasons. XPLR expects the laws and regulations applicable to its business and the energy industry, including laws and regulations generally supportive of clean energy project development, generally to be in a state of transition for the foreseeable future. Changes in the structure of the industry or in such laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's use of and reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) technologies may present certain risks that could materially adversely affect XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR, through agreements with NEE and its affiliates, utilizes AI technologies in various aspects of its operations, including, without limitation, financial analysis, strategic planning, field work intelligence, work scheduling, grid optimization, energy forecasting, customer service and operations management. The use of and reliance on AI may present certain risks such as, but not limited to, AI tools may malfunction, produce inaccurate or biased outputs, or behave unpredictably, and introduce XPLR to additional cybersecurity threats and data privacy risks. In addition, XPLR could experience third-party vendor issues such as disruptions in vendor relationships, performance issues, cybersecurity threats or disputes over intellectual property rights. Further, the regulatory environment governing AI is also evolving, and future legislation or agency rulemaking may impose new compliance obligations or restrict certain AI applications, increasing costs to comply with such requirements and failure to do so could result in regulatory enforcement, penalties or reputational harm. While AI technologies offer the potential to enhance operational efficiency, accelerate growth and lower costs, these benefits may not be realized and the use of and reliance on AI may present certain risks that could materially adversely affect XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR does not own all of the land on which the projects in its portfolio are located and its use and enjoyment of the property may be adversely affected to the extent that there are any lienholders or land rights holders that have rights that are superior to XPLR's rights or the BLM suspends its federal rights-of-way grants.
XPLR does not own all of the land on which the projects in its portfolio are located and they generally are, and its future projects may be, located on land occupied under long-term easements, leases and rights-of-way. The ownership interests in the land subject to these easements, leases and rights-of-way may be subject to mortgages securing loans or other liens and other easements, lease rights and rights-of-way of third parties that were created prior to XPLR's projects’ easements, leases and rights-of-way. As a result, some of XPLR's projects’ rights under such easements, leases or rights-of-way may be subject to the rights of these third parties. While XPLR performs title searches, obtains title insurance, records its interests in the real property records of the projects’ localities and enters into non-disturbance agreements to protect itself against these risks, such measures may be inadequate to protect against all risk that XPLR's rights to use the land on which its projects are or will be located and its projects’ rights to such easements, leases and rights-of-way could be lost or curtailed. Additionally, XPLR operations located on properties owned by others are subject to termination for violation of the terms and conditions of the various easements, leases or rights-of-way under which such operations are conducted.
Further, XPLR's activities conducted under federal rights-of-way grants are subject to “immediate temporary suspension” of unspecified duration, at any time, at the discretion of the BLM. A suspension of XPLR activities within a federal right-of-way may be issued by the BLM to protect public health or safety or the environment. An order to suspend XPLR activities may be issued by the BLM prior to an administrative proceeding and may require immediate compliance by XPLR. Any violation of such an order could result in the loss or curtailment of XPLR's rights to use any federal land on which its projects are or will be located.
Any such loss or curtailment of XPLR's rights to use the land on which its projects are or will be located as a result of any lienholders or leaseholders that have rights that are superior to XPLR's rights or the BLM’s suspension of its federal rights-of-way grants could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan. In certain instances, rights-of-way may be subordinate to the rights of government agencies, which could result in costs or interruptions to XPLR's service. Restrictions on XPLR's ability to use rights-of-way could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR is subject to risks associated with litigation or administrative proceedings, as well as negative publicity.
XPLR is subject to risks and costs associated with litigation and administrative proceedings, including without limitation, those that may contest the operation, development, construction or repowering of its projects. The existence of litigation as well as impacts of defending, or failing to prevail in, any such proceeding in which XPLR is involved or other future legal or administrative proceedings, regardless of the merits, may be material to XPLR and harm its reputation.
XPLR is subject to, and may also become subject to additional, claims based on alleged negative health effects related to acoustics, shadow flicker or other claims associated with wind turbines from individuals who live near XPLR's projects. Any such legal proceedings or disputes could materially increase the costs associated with XPLR's operations. In addition, XPLR may become subject to legal proceedings or claims contesting the operation, development, construction or repowering of XPLR's projects. Any such legal proceedings or disputes could materially delay XPLR's ability to complete construction or repowering of a project in a timely manner, or at all, or materially increase the costs associated with commencing or continuing a project’s commercial operations. Any settlement of claims or unfavorable outcomes or developments relating to these proceedings or disputes, such as judgments for monetary damages, penalties, injunctions or denial or revocation of permits, could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
From time to time, political and public sentiment may result in a significant amount of adverse press coverage and other adverse public statements affecting XPLR. Adverse press coverage and other adverse statements, whether or not driven by political or public sentiment, may also result in investigations by regulators, legislators and law enforcement officials or in legal claims. Responding to the negative publicity and any resulting investigations and lawsuits, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the proceeding, can divert the time and effort of senior management from XPLR's business.
Addressing any adverse publicity, governmental scrutiny or enforcement or other legal proceedings is time consuming and expensive and, regardless of the factual basis for the assertions being made, can have a negative impact on the reputation of XPLR. It may also have a negative impact on its ability to take timely advantage of various business and market opportunities. The direct and indirect effects of negative publicity, and the demands of responding to and addressing it, may have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Table of Contents
XPLR is subject to risks associated with its ownership interests in projects that undergo development or construction, including for repowering, and other capital improvements to its clean energy or other projects, which could result in its inability to complete development and construction at those projects on time or at all, and make those projects too expensive to complete or cause the return on an investment to be less than expected.
XPLR's ownership interests in clean energy or other projects that undergo development or construction, including for repowering, and other capital improvements are subject to risks. There may be delays or unexpected developments in completing any future construction projects, including through actions or inaction taken by federal agencies and departments as a result of executive orders such as the assessment and review required before issuing new or renewed approvals, rights-of-way, permits, leases or loans related to the development of energy projects. Such factors could cause the construction costs of these projects to exceed XPLR's expectations, result in substantial delays or prevent the project from commencing commercial operations. Further, XPLR could become obligated to make delay or termination payments or become obligated for other damages under contracts, could experience the loss, or reduction, of tax credits, bonus credits or tax incentives, the inability to transfer tax credits, or delayed or diminished returns, and could be required to write off all or a portion of its investment in the project. Various factors could contribute to these risks, including:
•delays in obtaining, or the inability to obtain, necessary permits, rights-of-way, easements, licenses and other approvals on schedule and within budget;
•delays and increased costs related to the interconnection of new projects to the transmission system;
•the inability to acquire or maintain land use and access rights;
•the failure to receive contracted third-party services;
•interruptions to dispatch at the projects;
•supply chain disruptions, including as a result of changes in international trade laws, regulations, agreements, treaties, taxes, tariffs, duties or policies of the U.S. or other countries in which XPLR's suppliers are located;
•geopolitical factors;
•work stoppages;
•disputes involving contractors, land owners, governmental entities, environmental groups, Native American and aboriginal groups, lessors, joint venture partners, suppliers and other third parties;
•weather interference;
•unforeseen engineering, environmental and geological problems, including, but not limited to, discoveries of contamination, protected plant or animal species or habitat, archaeological or cultural resources or other environment-related factors;
•changes to laws, regulations or policies that promote and support clean energy and enhance the economic viability of owning clean energy projects;
•negative publicity;
•unanticipated cost overruns in excess of budgeted contingencies, including for escalating costs for materials and labor and regulatory compliance; and
•failure of contracting parties, including suppliers, to perform under contracts.
In addition, it is common for XPLR, one of its subsidiaries or an affiliated party under the MSA to have an agreement with a third party to complete construction of its projects, in which case XPLR is subject to the viability and performance of the third party. XPLR's inability to find a replacement contracting party, if the original contracting party has failed to perform, could result in the abandonment of the construction of a project, while XPLR could remain obligated under other agreements associated with the project, including, but not limited to, offtake power sales agreements.
Any of these risks could cause XPLR's cash flows from, and financial returns on, these investments to be lower than expected or otherwise delay or prevent the completion of such projects or distribution of cash to XPLR, or could cause XPLR to operate below expected capacity or availability levels, which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Contract Risks
XPLR relies on a limited number of customers and vendors and is exposed to credit and performance risk in that they may be unwilling or unable to fulfill their contractual obligations to XPLR or that they otherwise terminate their agreements with XPLR.
In most instances, XPLR sells the energy generated by each of its clean energy projects to a single PPA counterparty under a long-term PPA. XPLR's equity method investees also have contracts with a limited number of counterparties.
XPLR expects that its existing and future contracts will be the principal source of cash flows available to execute its business plan. Thus, the actions of even one customer may cause variability of XPLR’s revenue, financial results and cash flows that are difficult to predict. Similarly, significant portions of XPLR’s credit risk may be concentrated among a limited number of customers and the failure of even one of these key customers to fulfill its contractual obligations to XPLR could significantly impact XPLR's business and financial results.
XPLR utilizes a limited number of vendors for the supply of equipment, materials and other goods and services required for its business operations and for the construction and operation of, and for capital improvements to, its facilities.
Any or all of XPLR's customers and vendors may fail to fulfill their obligations under their contracts with XPLR, whether as a result of the occurrence of any of the factors listed below or otherwise.
•Specified events beyond XPLR's control or the control of a customer may temporarily or permanently excuse the customer from its obligation to accept and pay for delivery of energy generated by a project. Specified events beyond XPLR's control or the control of a vendor may temporarily or permanently excuse the vendor from its obligation to supply equipment, materials, fuel and other goods and services to XPLR. These events could include, among other things, a system emergency, transmission failure or curtailment, adverse weather conditions or labor disputes.
•Adverse conditions in the energy industry or the general economy such as inflation, as well as circumstances of individual customers and vendors, may adversely affect the ability of some customers and vendors to perform as required under their contracts with XPLR.
•Certain of XPLR’s customers have been impacted by wildfires and have been, or could be, subject to significant liability which have had, or could be expected to have, a significant impact on their financial condition.
•The ability of XPLR's customers and vendors to fulfill their contractual obligations to XPLR depends on their financial condition. XPLR is exposed to the credit risk of its customers over an extended period of time due to the long-term nature of XPLR's contracts with them. These customers could become subject to insolvency or liquidation proceedings or otherwise suffer a deterioration of their financial condition when they have not yet paid for services delivered, any of which could result in underpayment or nonpayment under such agreements.
•A default or failure by XPLR to satisfy minimum energy requirements or mechanical availability levels under XPLR's agreements could result in damage payments to the applicable customer or termination of the applicable agreement.
Table of Contents
If XPLR's customers are unwilling or unable to fulfill their contractual obligations to XPLR, or if they otherwise terminate such contracts, XPLR may not be able to recover contractual payments due to XPLR. Since the number of customers that purchase wholesale bulk energy is limited, XPLR may be unable to find a new customer on similar or otherwise acceptable terms or at all. In some cases, there currently is no economical alternative counterparty to the original customer. The loss of, or a reduction in sales to, any of XPLR's customers could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
If any vendor or other counterparty fails to fulfill its contractual obligations, XPLR may need to make arrangements with other counterparties or vendors, which could result in material financial losses, higher costs, untimely completion of power generation or storage facilities and other projects, and/or a disruption of its operations. If a defaulting counterparty is in poor financial condition, XPLR may not be able to recover damages for any contract breach which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR may not be able to extend, renew or replace expiring or terminated PPAs, lease agreement or other customer contracts at favorable rates or on a long-term basis and XPLR may not have the ability to amend existing PPAs for renewable energy repowering projects.
XPLR's ability to extend, renew or replace its existing PPAs, lease agreement or other customer contracts as well as XPLR's ability to amend existing PPAs for renewable energy repowering projects, depends on a number of factors beyond its control, including, but not limited to:
•whether the PPA counterparty has a continued need for energy at the time of the agreement’s expiration or amendment, which could be affected by, among other things, the presence or absence of governmental incentives or mandates, prevailing market prices, and the availability of other energy sources;
•the satisfactory performance of XPLR's obligations under such PPAs, lease agreement or other customer contracts;
•the regulatory environment applicable to XPLR's contractual counterparties at the time;
•macroeconomic factors present at the time, such as population, business trends, international trade laws, regulations, agreements, treaties or policies of the U.S. or other countries and related energy demand; and
•the effects of regulation on the contracting practices of XPLR's contractual counterparties.
If XPLR is not able to extend, renew or replace on acceptable terms existing PPAs before contract expiration, or if such agreements are otherwise terminated prior to their expiration, XPLR may be required to sell the energy on an uncontracted basis at prevailing market prices, which could be materially lower than under the applicable contract and lower than it expected. If there is no satisfactory market for a project’s uncontracted energy, XPLR may decommission the project before the end of its useful life. Any failure to extend, renew or replace a significant portion of XPLR's existing PPAs, lease agreement or other customer contracts, or extending, renewing or replacing them at prices lower than it expected or with other unfavorable terms, or the decommissioning of a project or the inability to amend existing PPAs for renewable energy repowering projects could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
If the energy production by or availability of XPLR's clean energy projects is less than expected, they may not be able to satisfy minimum production or availability obligations under their PPAs.
XPLR's clean energy projects' energy production or availability could be less than expected due to various factors, including, but not limited to, wind or solar conditions, natural disasters, equipment underperformance, operational issues, changes in law or regulations or actions taken by third parties. The PPAs contain provisions that require XPLR to produce a minimum amount of energy or be available a minimum percentage of time over periods specified in the PPAs. A failure to produce sufficient energy or to be sufficiently available to meet XPLR's commitments under its PPAs could result in the payment of damages or the termination of PPAs and could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Development and Acquisition Risks
XPLR's ability to develop and/or acquire assets involves risks.
XPLR's ability to develop and/or acquire energy and other projects, including partial ownership interests, that are either operational or under construction, involves risks and requires XPLR to identify attractive development opportunities and acquisitions that can provide positive cash flows. Such development opportunities or acquisitions may not be available to XPLR on acceptable terms or at all. XPLR must obtain the consent of XPLR GP, which consent is not guaranteed, to develop new wind or solar energy projects (excluding off-shore wind projects) or utility-scale battery storage projects. Various factors could affect the availability of such development opportunities or acquisitions, including, but not limited to, the following factors and those described in more detail in the additional risk factors below:
•competing bids for a project from companies that may have substantially greater purchasing power, capital or other resources or a greater willingness to accept lower returns or more risk than XPLR does;
•a failure to agree to commercially reasonable financial or legal terms with sellers with respect to any proposed projects;
•fewer development and acquisition opportunities than XPLR expects, which could result from, among other things, available projects having less desirable economic returns or higher risk profiles than XPLR believes suitable;
•XPLR's inability to generate or otherwise obtain financing for projects on economically acceptable terms;
•XPLR's failure to successfully complete construction of and finance projects, to the extent that it decides to acquire projects that are not yet operational or to otherwise pursue development or construction activities with respect to new projects;
•XPLR's inability to obtain regulatory approvals or other necessary consents to consummate an acquisition; and
•the presence or potential presence of:
◦pollution, contamination or other wastes at the project site;
◦protected plant or animal species;
◦archaeological or cultural resources;
◦wind waking or solar shadowing effects caused by neighboring activities, which reduce potential energy production by decreasing wind speeds or reducing available insolation;
◦land use restrictions and other environment-related siting factors; and
◦opposition to wind, solar and storage projects in certain markets due to concerns about noise, health, environmental, safety or other alleged impacts of such projects.
Any of these factors could limit XPLR's development and acquisition opportunities and prevent it from executing, or diminish its ability to execute, its development and acquisition plans. Additionally, as NEER's ownership interest in XPLR is reduced, NEER may be less willing to sell projects to XPLR. An
Table of Contents
inability by XPLR to identify, or a failure by NEER to make available, suitable development and acquisition opportunities could materially adversely impact XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR may not be able to successfully consummate future development opportunities and/or acquisitions, whether from NEER or third parties. Any development opportunity or acquisition that may be available to XPLR may necessitate that it generate cash flow amounts as planned and be able to access the debt and equity markets. However, XPLR may not generate cash flow as planned and may be unable to access such markets on satisfactory terms or at all. Furthermore, even if XPLR does consummate development opportunities or acquisitions that XPLR believes will be accretive, such development opportunities or acquisitions may realize lower cash flows than anticipated as a result of incorrect assumptions in XPLR's evaluation of such acquisitions or development opportunities or unforeseen consequences or other external events beyond its control. Development opportunities and acquisitions involve numerous risks, including, but not limited to, difficulties in integrating acquired businesses and unexpected costs and liabilities. Any of the events described above could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Government laws, regulations and policies providing incentives and subsidies for clean energy could be changed, reduced or eliminated at any time and such changes may negatively impact XPLR and its ability to repower, acquire, develop or invest in clean energy and related projects.
XPLR's business, including XPLR's ability to repower, acquire, develop or invest in clean energy projects, partly depends on current laws, regulations and policies that promote and support clean energy and enhance the economic viability of developing, constructing and owning clean energy projects. Clean energy projects currently benefit from various U.S. federal, state and local governmental incentives, such as PTCs, ITCs, loan guarantees, RPS, MACRS for depreciation and other incentives, accelerated cost recovery deductions, renewable energy tax credit transferability and other commercially oriented incentives. These laws, regulations and policies, such as the PTCs or ITCs, have had a significant impact on the development of clean energy and they could be changed, reduced or eliminated at any time such as with the OBBBA and related governmental actions. These incentives make the development of clean energy projects more competitive by providing transferable clean energy tax credits, grants and accelerated depreciation for a portion of the development costs, decreasing the costs and risks associated with developing such projects or creating demand for renewable energy assets through RPS programs. The elimination of, loss of or reduction in such incentives, including qualifications for clean energy tax credits and transferability of clean energy tax credits, or the imposition of additional taxes, tariffs, duties or other costs or assessments on clean energy or the equipment necessary to generate, store or deliver it could result in, among other items, higher equipment costs, scarcity of equipment, the lack of a satisfactory market for the development and/or financing of new clean energy projects, XPLR abandoning the development of clean energy projects, a loss of investments in the projects and reduced project returns and a decrease in the attractiveness of clean energy projects to developers. An elimination, loss or reduction of such incentives could also reduce XPLR's willingness to pursue or develop certain clean energy projects due to higher operating costs or decreased revenues under its PPAs.
If these laws, regulations and policies are not continued or renewed, the market for future renewable energy PPAs may be smaller and the prices for future clean energy PPAs may be lower. If laws, regulations or policies limit the availability or transferability of the PTC or the ITC, repowering and new clean energy projects may no longer be economically feasible and could generate reduced revenues and reduced economic returns, experience increased financing costs and encounter difficulty obtaining financing on acceptable terms.
Additionally, many states have adopted RPS targets generating demand for renewable energy. To the extent these states achieve or modify their targets, programs or goals, or other states fail to adopt comparable policies, demand for renewable energy could be affected. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's ability to develop projects, including repowering renewable energy projects, faces risks related to project siting, financing, construction, permitting, the environment, governmental approvals and the negotiation of project development agreements.
Project development is a capital intensive business that relies heavily on the availability of debt and equity financing sources to fund projected construction and other capital expenditures. As a result, in order to successfully develop a project, XPLR must obtain sufficient financing to complete the development phase of its projects. Any significant disruption in the credit and capital markets, a significant increase in interest rates or an inability to generate cash flow levels as planned could make it difficult for XPLR to raise funds when needed to secure capital, which would limit XPLR’s ability to pursue and complete projects.
XPLR's ability to develop and construct clean energy generation and storage facilities may be adversely affected if it is unsuccessful in obtaining adequate project sites, necessary licenses, or permits on acceptable and reasonable terms or encounters delays in obtaining or renewing such, or obtaining regulatory approvals from local, state, or federal governmental authorities.
If the challenges of developing projects increase, XPLR's pool of available opportunities may be limited, which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Acquisitions of existing clean energy projects involve numerous risks.
The acquisition of existing clean energy projects involves numerous risks, including, but not limited to, exposure to existing liabilities and unanticipated post-acquisition costs associated with the pre-acquisition activities by the project, difficulty in integrating the acquired projects into XPLR's business and, if the projects are in new markets, the risks of entering markets where XPLR has limited experience. Additionally, XPLR risks overpaying for such projects or not making acquisitions on an accretive basis. Although XPLR performs due diligence on prospective acquisitions, XPLR may not discover all potential risks, operational issues or other issues in such projects. Further, the integration and consolidation of acquisitions require substantial human, financial and other resources and, ultimately, XPLR's acquisitions may divert XPLR's management’s attention from its existing business concerns, disrupt its ongoing business or not be successfully integrated. Future acquisitions might not perform as expected or the returns from such acquisitions might not support the financing utilized to acquire or maintain them. A failure to achieve the financial returns XPLR expects when XPLR acquires clean energy projects could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR may develop or acquire assets that use other renewable energy technologies and may develop or acquire other types of assets. Any such development or acquisition may present unforeseen challenges and result in a competitive disadvantage relative to XPLR's more-established competitors.
XPLR may develop or acquire assets that use other renewable energy technologies, and it may develop or acquire other types of assets, including, but not limited to, transmission projects and instruments relating to renewable energy. XPLR may be unable to identify attractive clean energy or transmission development or acquisition opportunities or develop or acquire such projects or assets at prices and on terms that are attractive. In addition, the pursuit of such development or consummation of such acquisitions could expose XPLR to increased operating costs, unforeseen liabilities and additional risks including, but not limited to, regulatory and environmental issues associated with entering new sectors of the energy industry. This could require a
Table of Contents
disproportionate amount of XPLR's management’s attention and resources, which could have an adverse impact on XPLR's business and place XPLR at a competitive disadvantage relative to energy market participants more experienced with new technologies and asset classes. A failure to successfully integrate such development opportunities or acquisitions as a result of unforeseen operational difficulties or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Certain agreements which XPLR or its subsidiaries are parties to have provisions which may limit or preclude XPLR from engaging in specified change of control and similar transactions.
The indebtedness, financing and other agreements of XPLR and its subsidiaries, including the agreements under which the noncontrolling Class B investors own membership interests in certain XPLR subsidiaries, contain provisions that may trigger acceleration of indebtedness or specified payment obligations of XPLR or its subsidiaries upon or in connection with specified transactions, including specified change of control and similar transactions. Because these provisions may materially increase the capital XPLR may need to expend to complete such a transaction, these provisions may limit or preclude XPLR from pursuing or consummating such transactions and limit the types of transactions XPLR is able to consummate.
XPLR faces substantial competition primarily from regulated utility holding companies, developers, IPPs, pension funds and private equity funds for opportunities in the U.S.
XPLR believes its primary competitors for opportunities in the U.S. are regulated utility holding companies, developers, IPPs, pension funds and private equity funds. XPLR competes with these companies to acquire projects. Furthermore, the industry has experienced and may experience volatile demand for wind turbines, solar panels and related components. If demand for this equipment increases, suppliers may give priority to other market participants, including, but not limited to, XPLR's competitors, who may have greater resources than XPLR. An inability to effectively compete with regulated utility holding companies, developers, IPPs, pension funds and private equity funds for opportunities in the U.S. could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations and its ability to execute its business plan.
Regulatory decisions that are important to XPLR may be materially adversely affected by political, regulatory, operational and economic factors.
The local and national political, regulatory and economic environment may have an adverse effect on regulatory decisions with negative consequences for XPLR. These decisions, which may come from any level of government, including through actions taken, or not taken, by government agencies as a result of executive orders, may require, for example, XPLR to cancel or delay planned development activities, to reduce or delay other planned capital expenditures or otherwise incur costs that it may not be able to recover, each of which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Depending on the circumstances, XPLR may develop and construct, or invest in, electric generation and storage facilities and associated infrastructure. As part of these activities, XPLR would need to periodically apply for licenses and permits, including those related to project siting, from various local, state, federal and other regulatory authorities and abide by their respective conditions, which could be impacted by actions taken, or not taken, by government agencies as a result of executive orders. Should XPLR be unsuccessful in obtaining or maintaining necessary licenses or permits on acceptable terms or resolving third-party challenges to such licenses or permits, should there be a delay in obtaining or renewing necessary licenses or permits or should regulatory authorities initiate any associated investigations or enforcement actions or impose related penalties or disallowances on XPLR, then XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to XPLR's Financial Activities
XPLR may not be able to access sources of capital on commercially reasonable terms.
XPLR needs to be able to access capital on commercially reasonable terms when development opportunities, repowering renewable energy projects, acquisitions, other growth opportunities or capital needs arise or to exercise buyout rights related to noncontrolling Class B members' interests under certain limited liability company agreements. XPLR’s ability to access capital on commercially reasonable terms is dependent on, among other factors, the overall state of the capital markets and investor appetite for investment in clean energy projects in general and in XPLR's, XPLR OpCo's or their subsidiaries' securities or securities convertible into, or settleable with, XPLR common units in particular. Investor demand for securities of XPLR or securities convertible into, or settleable with, XPLR common units may be impacted by, among other factors, the amount of securities outstanding that are convertible into, or settleable with, XPLR common units, the possibility of further sales of such securities, the amount and timing of any issuance of XPLR common units or the payment of cash in lieu of XPLR common units upon conversion or settlement, and any subsequent sales of such units by investors. Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in those capital and credit markets, related to, among other factors, inflation, rising interest rates, political, regulatory or geopolitical events and declining investor sentiment in XPLR and the renewable energy industry, has increased and could continue to adversely impact XPLR's cost of capital and affect its ability to fund its liquidity and capital needs including, without limitation, its ability to pay or refinance debt and buy out securities, such as noncontrolling Class B memberships interests in certain XPLR subsidiaries. An inability to obtain financing or refinance existing debt on commercially reasonable terms could also significantly limit XPLR’s ability to consummate future acquisitions and pursue other growth opportunities. In addition, the issuance of XPLR common units and securities convertible into, or settleable with, XPLR common units could cause significant common unitholder dilution. Issuances of additional securities, or the possibility that these issuances may occur, including following the conversion or settlement of securities convertible into, or settleable with, XPLR common units, could make it more difficult for XPLR to sell XPLR common units, or securities convertible into, or settleable with, XPLR common units, in the future, as well as affect XPLR's decision whether and when to issue common units to purchase previously issued securities of XPLR OpCo subsidiaries that are or may be settleable with XPLR common units.
Furthermore, there may not be sufficient availability under XPLR OpCo’s direct subsidiary's revolving credit facility or the ability to obtain other financing arrangements on commercially reasonable terms when acquisition or other growth opportunities or capital needs arise or to exercise buyout rights related to noncontrolling Class B members' interests under certain limited liability company agreements. An inability to obtain the required or desired financing could significantly limit XPLR's ability to consummate acquisitions and pursue other growth opportunities or to exercise buyout rights related to noncontrolling Class B members' interests under certain limited liability company agreements. If financing is available, it may be available only on terms that could significantly increase XPLR's interest expense and impose additional or more restrictive covenants. Any of the circumstances described above could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Restrictions in XPLR and its subsidiaries' financing agreements could adversely affect XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR and its subsidiaries have entered into financing agreements which contain various covenants and restrictive provisions and certain financial ratios that may limit their ability to, among other things:
Table of Contents
•incur or guarantee additional debt;
•make distributions on or redeem or repurchase common units;
•make certain investments and acquisitions;
•incur certain liens or permit them to exist;
•enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates;
•merge or consolidate with another company; and
•transfer, sell or otherwise dispose of projects.
Certain of the financing agreements also contain covenants requiring XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries to maintain certain financial ratios, including, but not limited to, as a condition to making cash distributions to XPLR and its other unitholder. XPLR OpCo's and its subsidiaries' ability to meet those financial ratios can be affected by events beyond XPLR's control, and XPLR OpCo may be unable to meet those ratios and tests and, therefore, may be unable to make cash distributions to its unitholders, including, but not limited to, XPLR. In addition, the financing agreements contain events of default provisions, including, but not limited to, provisions relating to certain changes in ownership of XPLR or its subsidiaries and other customary provisions.
The provisions of the financing agreements may affect XPLR's ability to obtain future financing and pursue attractive business opportunities and XPLR's flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in business conditions. A failure to comply with the provisions of the applicable financing agreement could result in an event of default, which could enable the lenders to declare, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable financing agreement, any outstanding principal of that debt, together with accrued and unpaid interest, to be immediately due and payable and entitle lenders to enforce their security interest. If the payment of the debt is accelerated and XPLR or a subsidiary fails to repay the debt, the revenue from the projects may be insufficient to repay such debt in full, the lenders could enforce their security interest and XPLR's unitholders could experience a partial or total loss of their investment. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR may be unable to maintain its current credit ratings.
The inability of XPLR to maintain its current credit ratings could materially adversely affect its ability to raise capital or obtain credit on commercially reasonable terms, which in turn, would likely increase its interest costs and could impact its ability to raise capital or otherwise fund its business, including, without limitation, to service indebtedness, repay or refinance borrowings and other obligations, exercise buyout rights related to noncontrolling Class B members' interests under certain limited liability company agreements, and finance development opportunities, including repowering renewable energy projects, acquisitions and other growth opportunities. In addition, certain agreements and guarantee arrangements would require posting of additional collateral in the event of a ratings downgrade. Some of the factors that can affect credit ratings are cash flows, liquidity, the amount of debt as a component of total capitalization, the rating agencies' treatment of certain financing arrangements and other instruments convertible into or settleable with equity. There can be no assurance that one or more of the ratings of XPLR will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR’s liquidity may be reduced if its credit providers are unable to fund their credit commitments to XPLR or to maintain their current credit ratings.
The inability of XPLR’s credit providers to fund their credit commitments or to maintain their current credit ratings could require XPLR to, among other things, renegotiate requirements in agreements, find an alternative credit provider with acceptable credit ratings to meet funding requirements, or post cash collateral and could have a material adverse effect on XPLR’s liquidity.
As a result of restrictions on XPLR's subsidiaries’ cash distributions to XPLR and XPLR OpCo under the terms of their indebtedness or other financing agreements, cash distributions received by XPLR and XPLR OpCo from their subsidiaries could be reduced or not received at all.
XPLR's ability to satisfy its obligations is dependent, in part, on cash distributions from XPLR OpCo. In any period, XPLR OpCo’s payment of cash distributions to its unitholders will depend on, among other things, the performance of XPLR's subsidiaries and present and anticipated future cash needs of the business. The ability of XPLR's subsidiaries to make distributions to XPLR and XPLR OpCo may be restricted or limited by, among other things, the provisions of existing and future indebtedness or other financing agreements.
The agreements governing XPLR's subsidiaries’ project-level debt contain financial tests and covenants that XPLR's subsidiaries must satisfy prior to making distributions and restrict the subsidiaries from making more than one distribution per quarter or per six-month period. If any of XPLR's subsidiaries is unable to satisfy these tests and covenants or is otherwise in default under such agreements, it would be prohibited from making distributions that could, in turn, affect the amount of cash distributed to XPLR OpCo and by XPLR OpCo to its unitholders. Additionally, certain such agreements require XPLR's projects to establish a number of reserves out of their revenues, including, but not limited to, reserves to service debt and reserves for O&M expenses. These cash reserves will affect the amount of cash distributed by XPLR OpCo, which will affect the amount of cash distributions to XPLR. Also, upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to, XPLR's subsidiaries’ inability to satisfy distribution conditions for an extended period of time, XPLR's subsidiaries’ revenues may be swept into one or more accounts for the benefit of the lenders under the subsidiaries’ debt agreements and the subsidiaries may be required to prepay indebtedness.
Under certain other financing agreements, noncontrolling Class B investors own membership interests in certain XPLR subsidiaries and receive a portion of the related XPLR subsidiaries’ cash distributions specified in the applicable limited liability company agreements. XPLR has the option (buyout right), subject to certain limitations, to purchase 100% of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests during specified periods. If XPLR does not exercise the buyout rights during the specified periods because of a lack of access to capital on commercially reasonable terms or otherwise, or if XPLR only partially exercises the buyout rights during the specified periods, the portion of the XPLR subsidiaries’ cash distribution allocated to the noncontrolling Class B investors would significantly increase. Any increase in the portion of XPLR subsidiaries’ cash distributions allocated to the noncontrolling Class B investors would reduce the amount of cash distributions allocated to XPLR OpCo and XPLR. Further, XPLR and XPLR OpCo may continue to reserve cash that otherwise would be available for distribution to unitholders for any such buyout or other business purposes in its discretion.
Provisions preventing or reducing XPLR's subsidiaries’ cash distributions and other factors could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ substantial amount of indebtedness, which may increase, may adversely affect XPLR's ability to operate its business, and its failure to comply with the terms of its subsidiaries' indebtedness or refinance, extend or repay the indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's financial condition.
XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ substantial indebtedness, which may increase, could have important consequences. For example,
Table of Contents
•failure to comply with the covenants in the agreements governing these obligations could result in an event of default under those agreements, which could be difficult to cure, result in bankruptcy or, with respect to subsidiary debt, result in loss of XPLR OpCo's ownership interest in one or more of its subsidiaries or in some or all of their assets as a result of foreclosure;
•XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ debt service obligations require them to dedicate a substantial portion of their cash flow to pay principal and interest on their debt, thereby reducing, in the case of XPLR's subsidiaries, their cash available for distribution to XPLR OpCo and XPLR ;
•XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ substantial indebtedness could limit XPLR's ability to fund operations of any projects acquired in the future and XPLR's financial flexibility, which could reduce its ability to plan for and react to unexpected opportunities or challenges;
•XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ substantial debt service obligations make XPLR vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic, credit markets, capital markets, industry, competitive conditions and government regulation that could place XPLR at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt;
•XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ substantial indebtedness could limit XPLR's ability to obtain financing for working capital, including, but not limited to, collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements and events of default, as well as development opportunities, acquisitions and general partnership or other purposes; and
•XPLR's and its subsidiaries' failure to repay or refinance debt at or prior to maturity could limit XPLR's ability to obtain financing for working capital.
If XPLR and its subsidiaries, including XPLR OpCo, do not comply with their obligations under their debt instruments, as the debt otherwise becomes due, they may need to refinance all or a part of their indebtedness, which they may not be able to do on similar terms or at all. Increases in interest rates, changes in debt covenants and changes in XPLR's credit ratings and other factors may reduce the amounts that XPLR and its subsidiaries can borrow, reduce XPLR's cash flows, increase the equity investment XPLR may be required to make in any projects XPLR may develop or acquire and increase the amount of equity XPLR may need to issue. If XPLR's subsidiaries are not otherwise able to generate sufficient cash to repay their outstanding indebtedness or are unable to comply with the terms of their indebtedness, XPLR could be required to reduce overhead costs, reduce the scope of its projects, sell some or all of its projects or delay construction of projects XPLR may develop, including repowering renewable energy projects, or acquire, all of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR is exposed to risks inherent in its use of interest rate swaps.
Some of XPLR's subsidiaries’ indebtedness accrues interest at variable rates, and some of its subsidiaries use interest rate swaps to try to protect against market volatility. The use of interest rate swaps, however, does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the value of a position or prevent losses if the value of a position declines. Such transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the value of a position increases. In addition, to the extent that actively-quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources are not available, the valuation of these contracts involves judgment or the use of estimates. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts. If the values of these financial contracts change in a manner that XPLR does not anticipate, or if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract, it could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Widespread public health crises and epidemics or pandemics may have material adverse impacts on XPLR’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR is subject to the impacts of widespread public health crises, epidemics and pandemics, including, but not limited to, impacts on the global, national or local economy, capital and credit markets, XPLR's customers and suppliers or the services NEER provides to XPLR. The ultimate severity, duration and impact of public health crises, epidemics and pandemics cannot be predicted. Actions taken in response to such crises by U.S. federal, state and local government or regulatory agencies may impact XPLR’s ability to access capital and could have a material adverse impact on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Risks Related to XPLR's Relationship with NEE
NEE has influence over XPLR.
Under XPLR’s partnership agreement, the board oversees and directs the operations and policies of XPLR and exercises management oversight over XPLR. At each annual meeting, four of XPLR’s seven directors will be elected by XPLR’s limited partners. The three remaining directors will be appointed by XPLR GP, in its sole discretion. The directors appointed by XPLR GP will be, and one director elected by holders of XPLR’s common units may be, officers or employees of NEE or its affiliates. In addition, NEE holds voting power over certain matters that require XPLR unitholder approval. NEE Management, subject to the terms of the MSA and XPLR's partnership agreement, will designate the officers of XPLR so long as NEE or one of its affiliates is the manager under the MSA.
The attorneys, independent accountants and others who perform services for XPLR will be selected by the board, which may be affiliated with NEE, or its conflicts committee and may perform services for NEE or its affiliates. XPLR may retain separate counsel for itself or the holders of common units in the event of a conflict of interest between NEE and its affiliates, on the one hand, and XPLR or the holders of common units, on the other, depending on the nature of the conflict. XPLR does not intend to do so in most cases.
Under the CSCS agreement, XPLR receives credit support from NEE and its affiliates. XPLR's subsidiaries may default under contracts or become subject to cash sweeps if credit support is terminated, if NEE or its affiliates fail to honor their obligations under credit support arrangements, or if NEE or another credit support provider ceases to satisfy creditworthiness requirements, and XPLR will be required in certain circumstances to reimburse NEE for draws that are made on credit support.
Under the CSCS agreement, guarantees and letters of credit have been provided by NEECH, NEER and other NEE affiliates to counterparties on behalf of XPLR's subsidiaries to satisfy XPLR's subsidiaries’ contractual obligations to provide credit support, including, but not limited to, under PPAs. These NEE affiliates also have provided credit support to lenders to fund reserve accounts. XPLR expects NEECH, NEER and other NEE affiliates, upon XPLR's request and at NEER’s option, to provide credit support on behalf of any projects XPLR may develop, including repowering renewable energy projects, or acquire in the future on similar terms but they are under no obligation to do so. Any failure of XPLR's subsidiaries to maintain acceptable credit support or credit support providers to honor their obligations under their respective credit support arrangements could cause, among other things, events of default to arise under XPLR's subsidiaries’ PPAs and financing agreements. Such events of default could entitle customers to terminate their contracts with XPLR's subsidiaries or could entitle lenders to accelerate indebtedness owed to them, which could result in the insolvency of XPLR's subsidiaries. In addition, if beneficiaries draw on credit support provided by NEECH, NEER and these other NEE affiliates, then XPLR OpCo may be required to reimburse them for the amounts drawn, which could reduce XPLR OpCo’s cash distributions. These events could decrease XPLR's revenues, restrict distributions from its subsidiaries, or result in a sale of or foreclosure on its assets. Further, NEE affiliates may not provide credit support in respect of new projects on the same terms on which they currently provide credit support for XPLR’s existing projects, which may require XPLR to obtain credit support from third parties on less favorable terms and may prevent XPLR from developing, including repowering renewable projects, or acquiring additional projects. All of the foregoing
Table of Contents
events, including, but not limited to, a failure of XPLR OpCo to have sufficient funds to satisfy its reimbursement obligations, could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
NEER and certain of its affiliates are permitted to borrow funds received by XPLR OpCo or its subsidiaries and are obligated to return these funds as needed to cover project costs and distributions or as demanded by XPLR OpCo. XPLR's financial condition and ability to execute its business plan is highly dependent on NEER’s performance of its obligations to return all or a portion of these funds.
NEER and certain of its affiliates are permitted to withdraw funds received by XPLR OpCo under the CSCS agreement, or XPLR OpCo's subsidiaries in connection with certain long-term debt agreements, and hold them in an account of NEER or its affiliates to the extent the funds are not required to pay project costs or otherwise required to be retained by XPLR's subsidiaries, until the financing agreements permit distributions to be made, or, in the case of XPLR OpCo, until such funds are required to make distributions or to pay expenses or other operating costs or XPLR OpCo otherwise demands the return of such funds. If NEER or one of its affiliates realizes any earnings on the withdrawn funds prior to the return of such funds, it will be permitted to retain those earnings, and will not pay interest on the withdrawn funds except as otherwise agreed upon with XPLR OpCo. The failure of NEER to return funds to XPLR's subsidiaries for any reason could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
NEER's right of first refusal may adversely affect XPLR's ability to consummate future sales or to obtain favorable sale terms.
XPLR and XPLR OpCo have entered into a ROFR agreement with NEER granting NEER and its subsidiaries (other than XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries) a right of first refusal on any proposed sale of any of the XPLR OpCo ROFR assets. The obligations of XPLR OpCo under the ROFR agreement may discourage a third party from pursuing a transaction with XPLR OpCo. Even if such third party is able to acquire the applicable asset, XPLR OpCo’s compliance with its obligations under the ROFR agreement could result in delays and transaction costs, as well as a reduced sales price. In addition, since the number of third parties willing to make an offer for a XPLR OpCo ROFR asset may be limited due to the ROFR agreement, XPLR OpCo may consummate the sale of any XPLR OpCo ROFR asset on less favorable terms, or may not be able to sell such asset, which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR GP and its affiliates may have conflicts of interest with XPLR and have limited duties to XPLR and its unitholders.
The board will appoint officers of XPLR (including its chief executive officer) designated by the manager in accordance with the terms of the MSA and XPLR's partnership agreement. As a result, all of XPLR’s executive officers could be officers or employees of NEE or one of its affiliates. XPLR’s partnership agreement provides contractual standards governing the duties of directors and officers, and directors and officers will not have fiduciary duties to XPLR or its unitholders. Conflicts of interest exist and may arise as a result of the relationships between NEE and the directors and officers of XPLR affiliated with NEE, on the one hand, and XPLR and XPLR's limited partners, on the other hand. To the extent any directors or officers of XPLR are also officers or employees of NEE, such directors and officers will have fiduciary and other duties to NEE but not to XPLR, and the interests of NEE and XPLR may be different or in conflict. In resolving such conflicts of interest, the directors and officers of XPLR affiliated with NEE may favor NEE's interests and the interests of NEE's affiliates over the interests of XPLR and its unitholders. These conflicts include the following situations, among others:
•No agreement requires NEE or its affiliates to pursue a business strategy that favors XPLR or uses XPLR's projects or dictates what markets to pursue or grow.
•NEE and its affiliates are not limited in their ability to compete with XPLR, and neither XPLR GP nor its affiliates have any obligation to present business opportunities to XPLR.
•So long as the officers of XPLR are officers or employees of NEE or its affiliates, they will or may also devote significant time to the business of NEE or its affiliates and will or may be compensated by NEE or its affiliates.
•The board may cause XPLR and/or its subsidiaries to borrow funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions, even if another purpose or effect of the borrowing is to settle payment obligations to NEE.
•XPLR's partnership agreement replaces the fiduciary duties that would otherwise be owed by XPLR GP and the directors and officers of XPLR with contractual standards governing their duties and limits XPLR GP’s and such directors’ and officers' liabilities and the remedies available to XPLR's unitholders for actions that, without these limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under applicable Delaware law.
•Except in limited circumstances, the board has the power and authority to conduct XPLR's business without the approval of XPLR GP or XPLR's unitholders.
•Actions taken by the board may affect the amount of cash available to pay distributions to XPLR's unitholders.
•XPLR GP has limited liability regarding XPLR's contractual and other obligations.
•The board controls the exercise of the rights of XPLR against NEE and its affiliates, and the enforcement of the obligations that NEE and its affiliates owe to XPLR.
As a result of the related nature of the management of XPLR and NEE and its affiliates, effectively managing these actual, perceived and potential conflicts may require substantial attention, and there is no assurance that all relevant actual, perceived or potential conflicts will be identified or that such conflicts will be adequately addressed. A decision by XPLR GP or the board to favor its own interests or the interests of NEE over XPLR's interests and the interests of its unitholders could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR GP and its affiliates and the directors and officers of XPLR are not restricted in their ability to compete with XPLR, whose business is subject to certain restrictions.
XPLR’s partnership agreement provides that its general partner is restricted from engaging in any business activities other than acting as XPLR GP and those activities incidental to its ownership of interests in XPLR. Affiliates of XPLR GP, including, but not limited to, NEE and its other subsidiaries, are not prohibited from owning projects or engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with XPLR. NEE currently holds interests in, and may make investments in and purchases of, entities that develop, acquire, own and operate clean energy projects. NEER is under no obligation to make any development or acquisition opportunities available to XPLR. In addition, pursuant to XPLR’s partnership agreement, its subsidiaries generally will not have any power or authority to solicit, review, respond to or otherwise participate in certain activities or lines of business, including the development of wind or solar projects (excluding off-shore wind projects), any natural gas pipeline or utility-scale battery storage projects without the consent of XPLR GP.
Under the terms of XPLR’s partnership agreement, the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any analogous doctrine, does not apply to XPLR GP and its affiliates, including, but not limited to, NEE or to XPLR's directors or officers. Any such person or entity that becomes aware of a potential transaction, agreement, arrangement or other matter that may be an opportunity for XPLR will not have any duty to communicate or offer such opportunity to XPLR. Any such person or entity will not be liable to XPLR or to any limited partner for breach of any fiduciary duty or other duty by reason of the fact that such person or entity pursues or acquires such opportunity for itself, directs such opportunity to another person or entity or does not communicate such opportunity or information to XPLR. This may create actual and potential conflicts of interest between XPLR and affiliates of XPLR GP and result in less
Table of Contents
than favorable treatment of XPLR and holders of its common units. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR may only terminate the MSA under certain limited circumstances.
The MSA provides that XPLR and certain affiliates may terminate the agreement only upon 90 days' prior written notice to NEE Management under certain limited circumstances. The agreement continues until January 1, 2068 and thereafter renews for successive five-year periods unless XPLR OpCo or NEE Management provides written notice to the other that it does not wish for the agreement to be renewed. If NEE Management’s performance does not meet the expectations of investors and XPLR is unable to terminate the MSA, the market price of XPLR's common units could suffer. In addition, even if the MSA is terminated, it may not terminate in respect of provisions relating to all fees payable to NEE Management under that agreement, which could result in NEE or its affiliates receiving payments that could otherwise be used to execute its business plan even though NEE Management would be no longer obligated to provide services to XPLR under the MSA.
If certain agreements with NEE Management or NEER are terminated, XPLR may be unable to contract with a substitute service provider on similar terms.
NEE's affiliates provide, or arrange for the provision of, administrative, O&M and development and construction management services under agreements with NEE Management and NEER, respectively. Any failure by NEE Management or NEER to perform their administrative, O&M and development and construction management services obligations or the failure by XPLR to identify and contract with replacement service providers, if required, could materially impact the successful operation of its projects. Under these agreements, certain NEE employees provide services to XPLR. In many cases, these services are not the primary responsibility of these employees, nor are these employees required to act for XPLR alone. The agreements do not require any specific individuals to be provided by NEE and NEE has the discretion to determine which of its employees perform services required to be provided to XPLR.
NEE Management and NEER have agreed to provide XPLR with management services under the MSA and the management sub-contract, respectively, and XPLR may have independent executive or senior management personnel. Each of the MSA and the management sub-contract, respectively, provides that NEE Management and NEER, respectively, may terminate the applicable agreement upon 180 days’ prior written notice of termination to XPLR if XPLR defaults in the performance or observance of any material term, condition or covenant contained in the agreement in a manner that results in material harm to NEE Management or its affiliates other than XPLR or its subsidiaries, and the default continues unremedied for a period of 90 days after written notice thereof is given to XPLR or upon the happening of certain specified events. If NEE Management terminates the MSA, if NEER terminates the management sub-contract or if either of them defaults in the performance of its obligations under the respective agreement, XPLR may be unable to contract with a substitute service provider on similar terms, and the costs of substituting service providers may be substantial. If XPLR cannot locate a service provider that is able to provide XPLR with substantially similar services as NEE Management and NEER provide under the MSA and the management sub-contract, respectively, on similar terms, it would likely have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's arrangements with NEE limit NEE’s potential liability, and XPLR has agreed to indemnify NEE against claims that it may face in connection with such arrangements, which may lead NEE to assume greater risks when making decisions relating to XPLR than it otherwise would if acting solely for its own account.
Under the MSA, NEE Management and its affiliates do not assume any responsibility other than to provide or arrange for the provision of the services described in the MSA in good faith. Additionally, under the MSA, the liability of NEE Management and its affiliates is limited to the fullest extent permitted by law to conduct involving bad faith, fraud, willful misconduct or recklessness or, in the case of a criminal matter, to action that was known to have been unlawful. XPLR has agreed, and will cause certain affiliates to, indemnify NEE Management and its affiliates and any of their directors, officers, agents, members, partners, stockholders and employees and other representatives of NEE Management and its affiliates to the fullest extent permitted by law from and against any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses incurred by an indemnified person or threatened in connection with XPLR's, XPLR OpCo GP's, XPLR OpCo's and certain affiliates' operations, investments and activities or in respect of or arising from the MSA or the services provided thereunder by NEE Management and its affiliates, except to the extent that the claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses are determined to have resulted from the conduct in respect of which such persons have liability as described above. Additionally, the maximum amount of the aggregate liability of NEE Management or any of its affiliates in providing services under the MSA or otherwise (including, but not limited to, NEER under the management sub-contract), or of any director, officer, employee, contractor, agent, advisor or other representative of NEE Management or any of its affiliates, will be equal to the base management fee previously paid by XPLR in the most recent calendar year under the MSA. These protections may result in NEE Management and its affiliates tolerating greater risks when making decisions than otherwise would be the case, including, but not limited to, when determining whether to use leverage in connection with development opportunities, including repowering renewable projects, and acquisitions. The indemnification arrangements to which NEE Management and its affiliates are a party may also give rise to legal claims for indemnification, which could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Risks Related to Ownership of XPLR's Units
Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the credit and capital markets, and in XPLR's operations, business and financing strategies, may exert downward pressure on the market price of XPLR’s common units.
The market price and trading volume of XPLR’s common units are subject to fluctuations as a result of, among other factors, general credit and capital market conditions, changes in the operations, business and financing strategies of XPLR, its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and in market sentiment regarding these factors. As a result, disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the credit and capital markets, or in XPLR's operations, business and financing strategies, may, for example, have a material adverse effect on the market price of XPLR’s common units.
XPLR may not make any distributions in the future to its unitholders as a result of the execution of its business plan.
XPLR may not make distributions in the future to its unitholders as a result of the execution of its business plan. XPLR's capital allocation priorities include investments to improve and expand XPLR's existing portfolio and investment opportunities adjacent to its existing clean energy assets. These investments may be highly capital-intensive and, as a result, XPLR may reserve cash which would otherwise be available for distribution to unitholders for these investments, as well as, the satisfaction of its obligations or such other business purposes in its discretion. As a result, XPLR may not pay any distributions in the future to unitholders.
XPLR's ability to execute its business plan depends on the ability of XPLR OpCo's subsidiaries to make cash distributions to XPLR OpCo.
XPLR's cash flow is generated from distributions XPLR receives from XPLR OpCo, which will consist primarily of cash distributions that XPLR OpCo has received from its subsidiaries. The amount of cash that XPLR OpCo’s subsidiaries will be able to distribute to XPLR OpCo each quarter principally
Table of Contents
depends upon the amount of cash such subsidiaries generate from their operations and investments. XPLR OpCo may not have sufficient available cash each quarter to pay distributions because of reduced operating cash flow, higher expenses, capital requirements or otherwise. The amount of cash available to XPLR OpCo will impact XPLR's ability to execute its business plan.
The amount of cash that XPLR OpCo generates from its operations will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on such things as the amount of power generated from its projects and the prices received therefor; its operating and capital costs; payment of interest and principal amortization, which depends on the amount of its indebtedness and the interest payable thereon; and the ability of XPLR OpCo’s subsidiaries to distribute cash under their respective financing agreements.
In addition, the amount of cash that XPLR OpCo will have available for distribution and to execute XPLR's business plan will depend on factors, some of which are beyond its control, such as:
•the amount of cash reserves established by XPLR OpCo GP for the proper conduct of partnership business, including for the payment of debt and other obligations and capital needs (such as the exercise of buyout rights) as they come due or arise;
•timing and collectability of receivables;
•fluctuations in its working capital needs;
•availability of borrowings under its subsidiaries' credit facility to pay distributions; and
•access to credit or capital markets.
Because of these factors, XPLR OpCo may not have sufficient available cash each quarter to pay a quarterly distribution per common unit or any other amount. Furthermore, the amount of cash available to XPLR OpCo for distribution depends upon the amount of cash reserves established by XPLR OpCo GP and upon XPLR OpCo's cash flow, including, but not limited to, cash flow from financial reserves and working capital borrowings, and is not solely a function of profitability, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result, XPLR OpCo may be able to make cash distributions during periods when it records net losses and may not be able to make cash distributions during periods when it records net income, which would limit the amount of distributions to XPLR. The amount of cash available at XPLR OpCo will impact XPLR's ability to execute its business plan.
Holders of XPLR’s units may be subject to voting restrictions.
Under XPLR’s partnership agreement, limited partners are allowed to vote for four of the seven members of the board. Moreover, any person, together with the members of any related group, who beneficially owns 5% or more of the outstanding units will be permitted to vote not more than 5% of such outstanding units in an election or removal of certain directors. Further, if, after giving effect to the 5% limitation, any person, together with the members of any related group, still has the power to cast votes equal to or greater than 10% of the units present and actually voted on any matter (including an election or removal of certain directors), such person will be entitled to direct the voting of only the units held by such person representing not more than 9.99% of the units actually voted on such matter, and any units held by such person equal to 10% or more of such voting power will be voted proportionally with the votes cast by other unitholders on such matter. However, if such person is XPLR's general partner or any of its affiliates, the 9.99% limitation on voting power applies only to the election or removal of certain directors.
XPLR’s partnership agreement replaces the fiduciary duties that XPLR GP and XPLR’s directors and officers might have to holders of its common units with contractual standards governing their duties and the NYSE does not require a publicly traded limited partnership like XPLR to comply with certain of its corporate governance requirements.
XPLR’s partnership agreement contains provisions that eliminate the fiduciary standards to which XPLR GP or any of XPLR’s directors and officers would otherwise be held by state fiduciary duty law and replaces those standards with several different contractual standards.
For example, XPLR’s partnership agreement permits the board to make some decisions in its sole discretion, free of any duties to XPLR or its unitholders other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing (which means that a court will enforce the reasonable expectations of the partners where the language of the XPLR partnership agreement does not provide for a clear course of action). These provisions entitle the board to consider only the interests and factors that the board desires and relieves the board of any duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, XPLR, its affiliates or XPLR's limited partners.
XPLR’s partnership agreement permits XPLR GP to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as XPLR's general partner, free of any duties to XPLR or its unitholders other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing. These provisions entitle XPLR GP and its affiliates to consider only the interests and factors that they desire and relieve them of any duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, XPLR, its affiliates or XPLR's limited partners. Examples of decisions that XPLR GP and its affiliates may make in their individual capacities include:
•appointment of three directors of XPLR;
•how to exercise voting rights with respect to the units XPLR GP or its affiliates own in XPLR OpCo and XPLR;
•whether to exchange XPLR OpCo common units owned by NEE Equity for XPLR common units or, with the approval of the conflicts committee, to have XPLR OpCo redeem XPLR OpCo common units owned by NEE Equity for cash; and
•whether to consent to, among other things, XPLR’s participation in certain activities or lines of business, the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of XPLR, any merger, consolidation or conversion of XPLR, dissolution of XPLR or an amendment to XPLR OpCo’s partnership agreement.
Additionally, as XPLR is a publicly traded limited partnership listed on the NYSE, it is not required to have, and it does not currently have, a majority of independent directors on the board and is not required to establish a compensation committee or a nominating and corporate governance committee.
XPLR’s partnership agreement restricts the remedies available to holders of XPLR's common units for actions taken by XPLR’s directors or XPLR GP that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duties.
XPLR’s partnership agreement contains provisions that restrict the remedies available to its unitholders for actions taken by XPLR’s directors or XPLR GP that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duties under state law. For example, XPLR’s partnership agreement provides that:
•whenever XPLR GP or the board, or any director or any committee of the board (including, but not limited to, the conflicts committee), makes a determination or takes, or declines to take, any other action in its respective capacity, they are required to act in good faith;
•XPLR GP will not have any liability to XPLR or its unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a general partner so long as such decisions are made in good faith;
•XPLR GP and its officers and directors and the officers and directors of XPLR will not be liable for monetary damages to XPLR or XPLR's limited partners resulting from any act or omission unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction
Table of Contents
determining such persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that the conduct was criminal; and
•XPLR GP and its affiliates and XPLR’s directors will not be in breach of their obligations under XPLR’s partnership agreement (including, but not limited to, any duties to XPLR or its unitholders) if a transaction with an affiliate or the resolution of a conflict of interest is:
• approved by the conflicts committee of the board, although the board is not obligated to seek such approval;
• approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by XPLR GP and its affiliates if the conflict involves XPLR GP or any of its affiliates;
• determined by the board to be on terms no less favorable to XPLR than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
• determined by the board to be fair and reasonable to XPLR, taking into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including, but not limited to, other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to XPLR.
In connection with a situation involving a transaction with an affiliate or a conflict of interest, any determination by XPLR GP or the board, or the conflicts committee of the board, must be made in good faith. If an affiliate transaction or the resolution of a conflict of interest is not approved by XPLR's unitholders or the conflicts committee and the board determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the affiliate transaction or conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth sub-bullets above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or XPLR challenging such determination, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption.
Certain of XPLR’s actions require the consent of XPLR GP.
Under XPLR’s partnership agreement, XPLR GP's consent is required for certain actions of XPLR, in addition to approval by the board or unitholders, as applicable. Because XPLR GP is indirectly owned by NEE, NEE can cause XPLR GP to exercise certain protective rights. XPLR’s partnership agreement provides that XPLR GP may grant or withhold its consent in its sole discretion. To the extent XPLR GP withholds its consent, XPLR unitholders and the board will be prevented from taking actions which they may consider beneficial to XPLR or its unitholders.
Holders of XPLR's common units currently cannot remove XPLR GP without NEE’s consent and provisions in XPLR's partnership agreement may discourage or delay an acquisition of XPLR that XPLR unitholders may consider favorable.
The vote of the holders of at least 66 2⁄3% of all outstanding common units and special voting units voting together as a single class is required to remove XPLR's general partner. Further, the vote of the holders of at least a majority of all outstanding common units and special voting units voting together as a single class is required to name a new general partner of XPLR. Given XPLR GP and its affiliates current voting power with respect to XPLR’s outstanding units, a vote to remove XPLR’s general partner would currently require NEE’s consent.
In addition, certain provisions in XPLR's partnership agreement, including limitations upon the ability of unitholders to make binding proposals of other business to be considered at annual meetings or to request special meetings, may discourage unitholders from attempting to remove the general partner or otherwise change XPLR's management. These provisions may have the effect of limiting the ability of a third party to acquire control of XPLR that might involve a premium to the market price of XPLR's common units or otherwise be in the unitholders' best interests.
NEE’s interest in XPLR GP and the control of XPLR GP may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.
XPLR’s partnership agreement does not restrict the ability of NEE to transfer all or a portion of its ownership interest in XPLR GP to a third party. XPLR’s partnership agreement also does not restrict the ability of XPLR GP to issue equity securities in a public or private transaction. A new owner of all or a portion of an ownership interest in XPLR GP could then be in a position to designate its own representatives to the board.
Reimbursements and fees owed to XPLR GP and its affiliates for services provided to XPLR or on XPLR's behalf will reduce cash distributions from XPLR OpCo and there are no limits on the amount that XPLR OpCo may be required to pay.
Under XPLR OpCo’s partnership agreement, prior to making any distributions on its units, XPLR OpCo will reimburse XPLR GP and its affiliates, including, but not limited to, NEE, for out-of-pocket expenses they incur and payments they make on XPLR's behalf and for certain payments made under credit support arrangements provided by NEER on behalf of XPLR's subsidiaries. XPLR OpCo will also pay certain fees and reimbursements under the MSA and the CSCS agreement prior to making any distributions on its units. The reimbursement of expenses and certain payments made under credit support arrangements and payment of fees, if any, to XPLR GP and its affiliates will reduce the amount of available cash XPLR OpCo has to pay cash distributions to XPLR. Under XPLR OpCo’s partnership agreement, there is no limit on the fees and expense reimbursements XPLR OpCo may be required to pay.
The liability of holders of XPLR's units, which represent limited partnership interests in XPLR, may not be limited if a court finds that unitholder action constitutes control of XPLR's business.
A general partner of a limited partnership generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the limited partnership except for those contractual obligations of the limited partnership that are expressly made without recourse to the general partner. XPLR is organized under Delaware law and XPLR conducts business in a number of other states. The limitations on the liability of holders of limited partnership interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some of the other states in which XPLR does business. A unitholder could be liable for any and all of XPLR's obligations as if the unitholder were a general partner if a court or government agency were to determine that:
•XPLR was conducting business in a state but had not complied with that particular state’s limited partnership statute; or
•the unitholder’s right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace XPLR GP, to approve some amendments to XPLR's partnership agreement or to take other actions under XPLR's partnership agreement constitute “control” of XPLR's business.
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that were wrongfully distributed to them.
Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under Delaware law, XPLR may not make a distribution to its unitholders if the distribution would cause XPLR's liabilities to exceed the fair value of its assets. Delaware law provides that for a period of three years from the date of an impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will be liable to the limited partnership for the distributed amount. Transferees of common units are liable both for the obligations of the transferor to make contributions to the partnership that were known to the transferee at the time of transfer and for those obligations that were unknown if the liabilities could have been determined from XPLR's partnership agreement. Neither liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interest nor liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted.
Table of Contents
The issuance of common units, or other limited partnership interests, or securities convertible into, or settleable with, common units, and any subsequent conversion or settlement, will dilute common unitholders’ ownership in XPLR, will impact the relative voting strength of outstanding XPLR common units and issuance of such securities, or the possibility of issuance of such securities, as well as the resale, or possible resale following conversion or settlement, may result in a decline in the market price for XPLR's common units.
XPLR's partnership agreement does not limit the number of additional limited partnership interests, including, but not limited to, limited partnership interests that rank senior to the common units, which XPLR may issue at any time without the approval of its unitholders.
XPLR has issued and outstanding convertible notes and certain XPLR OpCo subsidiaries have issued and outstanding noncontrolling Class B membership interests in their subsidiaries that may be settled in whole or in part as specified in the related limited liability company agreement, at XPLR's election with XPLR common units, and may issue similar securities in the future. Subject to certain limitations, the convertible notes may be converted by the holders of such notes, with XPLR paying cash up to the aggregate principal amount of the notes being converted. XPLR will have the option to deliver XPLR common units for the remainder, if any, of XPLR's conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the notes being converted. XPLR has the option, subject to certain limitations and extensions, to purchase the noncontrolling Class B membership interests in those XPLR OpCo subsidiaries. If exercised, XPLR has the right to pay all or a portion of the buyout price in XPLR non-voting common units (convertible into XPLR common units) or XPLR common units, as specified in the related limited liability company agreement, issued at the then-current market price of XPLR common units, subject to certain limitations. If holders of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests, convertible notes or any convertible securities issued in the future, were to dispose of a substantial portion of these common units in the public market following such a conversion or settlement, whether in a single transaction or series of transactions, it could adversely affect the market price for XPLR's common units. The holders of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests generally have certain registration rights that would facilitate such dispositions promptly and XPLR cannot guarantee that these holders will not dispose of a substantial portion or all of their common units promptly upon conversion or settlement.
Any issuance of XPLR common units, or other XPLR limited partnership interests, securities convertible into, or settleable with, common units as well as the issuance of XPLR non-voting common units or XPLR common units, as the case may be, upon conversion or settlement, will or may have the following effects:
•an existing common unitholder’s proportionate ownership interest in XPLR may decrease; and
•the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding common unit may be diminished.
In addition, any issuance, or the possibility of issuance, of the securities described in the preceding sentence, as well as the resale, or possibility of resale, of XPLR common units following conversion or settlement may result in a decline in the market price of XPLR common units and could make it more difficult for XPLR to sell XPLR's common units in the future.
Taxation Risks
XPLR's future tax liability may be greater than expected if XPLR does not generate net operating losses (NOLs) sufficient to offset taxable income, if the tax law changes, or if tax authorities challenge certain of XPLR's tax positions.
Even though XPLR is organized as a limited partnership under state law, XPLR is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and thus is subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates on XPLR's net taxable income. XPLR expects to generate NOLs and NOL carryforwards that it can use to offset future taxable income. Further, the IRS or other tax authorities could challenge one or more tax positions XPLR or XPLR OpCo takes, such as the classification of assets under the income tax depreciation rules, the characterization of expenses (including, but not limited to, fees paid to NEE) for income tax purposes, the extent to which sales, use or goods and services tax applies to operations in a particular state or the availability of property tax exemptions with respect to XPLR's projects. Further, any change in tax law may affect XPLR's tax position, including, but not limited to, changes in corporate income tax laws, regulations, policies, guidance, clean energy tax credits and transferability of clean energy tax credits, the issuance of guidance related to the qualification for clean energy tax credits and bonus credits, applicable to XPLR. While XPLR expects that its NOLs and NOL carryforwards will be available to XPLR as a future benefit, in the event that they are not generated as expected, are successfully challenged by the IRS (in a tax audit or otherwise) or are subject to future limitations as described below, XPLR's ability to realize these benefits may be limited and could have a material adverse effect on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR's U.S. federal, state or local tax positions may be challenged by the relevant tax authority. The process and costs, including, but not limited to, potential penalties for nonpayment of disputed amounts, of appealing such challenges, administratively or judicially, regardless of the merits, could be material. A reduction in XPLR's expected NOLs, a limitation on XPLR's ability to use such losses, or other tax attributes, such as tax credits, and future tax audits or a challenge by tax authorities to XPLR's tax positions may result in a material increase in XPLR's estimated future income taxes or other tax liabilities, which would negatively impact the amount of cash available to XPLR and its financial condition.
XPLR's ability to use NOLs to offset future income may be limited.
XPLR's ability to use its NOLs to offset future taxable income could be substantially limited if XPLR’s unitholders that own 5% or more of XPLR’s outstanding common units, as defined under Code Section 382, increase their ownership in XPLR by more than 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period through, among other things, additional purchases of XPLR's common units and certain types of reorganization transactions. Any NOLs that exceed this limitation may be carried forward and used to offset taxable income for the remainder of the carryforward period (i.e., 20 years from the year in which such NOL was generated for NOLs generated prior to January 1, 2018 and no carryforward limitation for any subsequently generated NOLs). Based on XPLR’s most recent annual assessment, XPLR does not expect the Section 382 limitation to impact its ability to utilize any of its NOLs to offset future taxable income. Additionally, valuation allowances may be needed for deferred tax assets that XPLR estimates are more likely than not to be unusable, based on available evidence at the time the estimate is made. Potential changes in the tax law or in XPLR’s projections could impact XPLR's assessment and valuation allowance estimates, which could have a material adverse impact on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
XPLR will not have complete control over XPLR's tax decisions.
XPLR and/or XPLR OpCo may be included in the combined or unitary tax returns of NEE or one or more of its subsidiaries for U.S. state or local income tax purposes. XPLR is a party to a tax sharing arrangement which determines the share of taxes that XPLR will pay to, or receive from, NEE. In addition, by virtue of XPLR's inclusion in NEE’s combined or unitary income tax returns, NEE will effectively control all of XPLR's state and local tax decisions in connection with any combined or unitary income tax returns in which XPLR is included. NEE will have sole authority to respond to and conduct all tax proceedings (including, but not limited to, tax audits) related to XPLR, to file all state and local income tax returns on XPLR's behalf, and to determine the amount of XPLR's liability to, or entitlement to payment from, NEE in connection with any combined or unitary income tax returns in which XPLR is
Table of Contents
included. This may result in conflicts of interest between NEE and XPLR and could have a material adverse impact on XPLR's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to execute its business plan.
Distributions to unitholders may be taxable as dividends.
Even though XPLR is organized as a limited partnership under state law, XPLR is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, if XPLR makes distributions from current or accumulated earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such distributions will generally be taxable to unitholders as ordinary dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Distributions paid to non-corporate U.S. unitholders will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at preferential rates, provided that certain holding period and other requirements are satisfied. Distributions to unitholders that exceed XPLR's current and accumulated earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes would constitute a non-taxable return-of-capital distribution to the extent of a unitholder’s basis in its units. In addition, although return-of-capital distributions are generally non-taxable to the extent of a unitholder’s basis in its units, such distributions will reduce the unitholder’s adjusted tax basis in its units, which will result in an increase in the amount of gain (or a decrease in the amount of loss) that will be recognized by the unitholder on a future disposition of XPLR's common units, and to the extent any return-of-capital distribution exceeds a unitholder’s basis, such distributions will be treated as gain on the sale or exchange of the units.
Table of Contents
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Risk Management and Strategy
Under agreements with NEE Management and NEER, NEE's affiliates provide or arrange for the provision to XPLR of substantially all of XPLR's information technology functions, including those relating to cybersecurity. XPLR's board oversees the provision of these services.
NEE operates a cybersecurity program which, among other objectives, seeks to identify potential unauthorized occurrences on or conducted through the electronic information resources owned or used by NEE (information systems), including those used for the provision of functions to XPLR, that may result in adverse effects on the confidentiality, integrity or availability of its information systems or any information residing on those systems (cybersecurity threats), as well as on its operations, including its provision of services to XPLR. The cybersecurity program includes controls to reduce the risk and potential impact of a cybersecurity incident and to align its processes, controls and implemented technologies with industry standard frameworks and regulations. In addition, outside experts assess NEE’s cybersecurity program capabilities, technology environment and security controls to regularly evaluate effectiveness.
NEE operates a cybersecurity operations center and has cyber threat intelligence capability to identify, monitor, detect and respond to cybersecurity threats, including those related to XPLR, which is led by a cybersecurity incident response team. NEE uses these resources, and leverages third party resources, to identify cybersecurity threats and monitor for anomalies that may result in cybersecurity incidents on its systems, and monitors for impacts to their vendors or suppliers, including those related to XPLR. Assessment of incidents includes, but is not limited to, analysis of the urgency and operational or business impact of an incident and the status and effectiveness of incident defenses. NEE invests in personnel and technologies with the objective of limiting the frequency and impact of cybersecurity incidents. Following documented cybersecurity incident response procedures, the cybersecurity incident response team escalates information about cybersecurity incidents depending on circumstances to oversight committees and personnel charged with managing specific aspects of cybersecurity risk, including, among others, the Cybersecurity and Resiliency Committee, the Cybersecurity Governance Executive Committee and individuals serving as officers and directors of XPLR.
NEE conducts periodic tabletop exercises and an annual cybersecurity drill with the participation from time to time of local, state and U.S. federal agencies to test its capability of dealing with a simulated cyberattack. NEE also participates in industry forums and various trade groups, as well as in NERC activities, to learn and apply these incident preparedness learnings to its cybersecurity policies and procedures.
NEE uses third parties to periodically assess the extent to which its cybersecurity risk management protocols align with the U.S. Department of Energy’s Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model standard or to the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology's Cybersecurity Framework for Protecting Critical Infrastructure. Certain functions within NEE are required to comply with certain regulatory standards that are designed to protect against cybersecurity incidents, including the NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection standards. Further, NEE has a cybersecurity training program and a mock phishing program to educate and train employees on potential cybersecurity risks and on privacy and data protection. Given geopolitical events, NEE continues to take steps to defend against cybersecurity threats to its and XPLR's critical infrastructure, including communications and training with personnel to ensure heightened awareness of increased cybersecurity threats worldwide.
The cybersecurity capabilities of third-party vendors providing services to NEE or accessing NEE’s systems or data, including those related to XPLR, are evaluated as part of the new vendor establishment process. NEE retains the right to audit vendors for cybersecurity of products and services. Where applicable in NEE’s or XPLR's contracts with third-party vendors accessing their systems or data, standard data security terms and conditions are utilized and minimum amounts of insurance coverage based on the risk of exposure are required.
NEE, through the MSA, operates U.S. critical infrastructure for XPLR. There have been cyberattacks and other physical attacks within the energy industry on energy infrastructure such as substations and related assets and there may be such attacks in the future. In addition, the advancement of artificial intelligence has given rise to new security risks. Although there have been no cybersecurity incidents or threats with a material impact on NEE's or XPLR's business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition, NEE's information technology systems could fail or be breached, and such systems could be inoperable, causing NEE and XPLR to be unable to fulfill critical business operations. The disclosures herein should be reviewed with the risk factors included in Item 1A.
Table of Contents
Governance
NEE's vice president and chief information officer, vice president cybersecurity and executive director cybersecurity are responsible for assessing and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats, including, through the MSA, those related to XPLR. They have careers that represent more than 50 years of combined experience related to the management and protection of technologies. These individuals participate in or receive updates from not only the cybersecurity incident response team but also cybersecurity oversight committees, such as the Cybersecurity and Resiliency Committee and the Cybersecurity Governance Executive Committee. These NEE committees are charged with governing cybersecurity, cyber risks and resilience activities as well as the cyber and physical security policies and programs for NEE and its subsidiaries as well as XPLR.
The XPLR board is responsible for the oversight of risks from cybersecurity threats. XPLR continues to utilize, through the MSA, NEE's cybersecurity program and capabilities. Significant active cybersecurity incidents and threats are communicated to XPLR's board as they occur.
Item 2. Properties
XPLR and its subsidiaries maintain properties consisting of clean generation projects; the principal properties are described in Item 1. Business, which description is incorporated herein by reference.
Character of Ownership
Substantially all of XPLR's generation facilities are owned by XPLR subsidiaries and are currently subject to NEE Equity's approximately 51.2% noncontrolling limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo. In addition, NEER owns noncontrolling ownership interests in certain XPLR OpCo subsidiaries and third-party investors own noncontrolling interests in certain XPLR OpCo subsidiaries. See Item 1. Certain of the generation facilities are encumbered by liens securing various financings. Additionally, some of the generation facilities occupy or use real property that is not owned by XPLR subsidiaries, primarily through various easements, leases, rights-of-way, permits or licenses from private landowners or governmental entities.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
See Note 16 – Legal Proceedings.
With regard to environmental proceedings to which a governmental authority is a party, XPLR's policy is to disclose any such proceeding if it is reasonably expected to result in monetary sanctions of greater than or equal to $1 million.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Common Unit Data. XPLR's common units are traded on the NYSE under the symbol "XIFR".

XPLR's partnership agreement requires it to distribute all of its available cash quarterly. Generally, available cash is all cash on hand at the date of determination relating to that quarter (including any expected distributions from XPLR OpCo), less the amount of cash reserves established by the board. XPLR currently expects that any cash on hand at the date of determination relating to that quarter would be reserved by the board to provide for the proper conduct of XPLR's business. Cash flow is generated from distributions XPLR receives from XPLR OpCo each quarter. XPLR expects XPLR OpCo to establish cash reserves prior to making distributions, if any, to XPLR to pay costs and expenses of XPLR's subsidiaries, in addition to XPLR's expenses, as well as any debt service requirements, future capital expenditures and to provide for the exercise of the buyout rights relating to noncontrolling Class B members' interest under certain limited liability company agreements to which XPLR and certain of its subsidiaries is a party or by which it is bound, or its assets are subject, or otherwise for the proper conduct of XPLR OpCo's business.
XPLR OpCo's partnership agreement requires it to distribute all of its available cash to its unitholders, including XPLR, each quarter. However, XPLR OpCo GP may reserve cash that otherwise would be available for distribution to unitholders, including XPLR, for other business purposes in its discretion. Generally, XPLR OpCo's available cash is all cash on hand at the date of determination relating to that quarter, plus any funds borrowed, less the amount of cash reserves established by XPLR OpCo GP. The majority of such available cash is expected to be derived from the operations of the projects and could fluctuate from quarter to quarter, and in some cases significantly, as a result of the performance of the projects, seasonality, fluctuating wind and solar resource, maintenance and outage schedules, timing of debt service and other factors. XPLR OpCo currently expects that any cash on hand at the date of determination relating to that quarter would be reserved to pay costs and expenses of XPLR's subsidiaries, in addition to XPLR's expenses, as well as any debt service requirements, future capital expenditures and to provide for the exercise of the buyout rights relating to noncontrolling Class B members' interest under certain limited liability company agreements to which XPLR and certain of its subsidiaries is a party or by which it is bound, or its assets are subject, or otherwise for the proper conduct of XPLR OpCo's business.
Table of Contents
In January 2025, as part of a strategic repositioning, XPLR's board and XPLR OpCo GP reserved cash for other business purposes as described above and accordingly XPLR suspended distributions to its common unitholders.
As of January 31, 2026, there were 9 holders of record of XPLR's common units.
Incentive Distribution Rights Fee. IDRs represent the right to receive a fee calculated based on the amount of adjusted available cash from operating surplus, as defined in the MSA, that XPLR OpCo would be able to distribute to its common unitholders after specified minimum quarterly and target quarterly distribution levels have been achieved. The right to receive the IDR fee is currently held by NEE Management, but may be assigned, subject to restrictions in the MSA. In May 2023, the MSA was amended to suspend the IDR fee to be paid by XPLR in respect to each calendar quarter beginning with the IDR fee related to the period commencing on (and including) January 1, 2023 and expiring on (and including) December 31, 2026. The following discussion does not reflect that the IDR fee has been suspended as described in the preceding sentence and assumes that NEE Management continues to retain the right to receive the IDRs.
Under the MSA, for any quarter in which XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash at least equal to a base incentive amount (total common units outstanding multiplied by $0.3525, plus approximately $14 million paid to NEE Management quarterly for IDRs) any excess adjusted available cash will be split 75% to XPLR OpCo common unitholders and 25% to NEE Management for IDRs. The IDR fee paid by XPLR is capped at $39.25 million per quarter ($157 million per year) if quarterly distributions to XPLR OpCo unitholders are at or above $0.7625 ($3.05 on an annualized basis) per XPLR OpCo common unit.
If XPLR OpCo's adjusted available cash for any quarter falls below the base incentive amount, the IDRs will be paid using the target quarterly distribution levels below calculated using the number of XPLR OpCo common units outstanding on January 30, 2017, subject to certain adjustments for repurchases, splits and combinations:
| Total Quarterly Distributionper XPLR OpCo Common Unit Target Amount | Marginal Percentage Interest in Adjusted Available Cash | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEE Management | ||||
| Minimum Quarterly Distribution | 0.1875 | 100% | —% | |
| First Target Quarterly Distribution | Above 0.1875 up to 0.215625 | 100% | —% | |
| Second Target Quarterly Distribution | Above 0.215625 up to 0.234375 | 85% | 15% | |
| Third Target Quarterly Distribution | Above 0.234375 up to 0.281250 | 75% | 25% | |
| Thereafter | Above 0.281250 | 50% | 50% |
All values are in US Dollars.
During 2023, XPLR paid IDR fees of approximately $39 million.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Affiliated Purchaser. In October 2015, XPLR was advised that NEE authorized a program to purchase, from time to time, up to $150 million of XPLR's outstanding common units. Under the program, purchases may be made in amounts, at prices and at such times as NEE or its subsidiaries deem appropriate, all subject to market conditions and other considerations. The common unit purchase program does not require NEE to acquire any specific number of common units and may be modified or terminated by NEE at any time. The purpose of the program is not to cause XPLR’s common units to be delisted from the NYSE or to cause the common units to be deregistered with the SEC. During 2025, 2024 and 2023, there were no purchases under the program. At December 31, 2025, the dollar value of units that may yet be purchased under the program was approximately $114 million.
Item 6. Reserved
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein. All comparisons are with the corresponding items in the prior year.
Overview
Company Description
XPLR is a limited partnership that, through its ownership in XPLR OpCo, has a partial ownership interest in clean energy infrastructure assets including wind, solar and battery storage projects. XPLR consolidates the results of XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries through its controlling interest in the general partner of XPLR OpCo. At December 31, 2025, XPLR owned an approximately 48.8% limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo and NEE Equity owned a noncontrolling 51.2% limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo. XPLR's financial results are shown on a consolidated basis with financial results attributable to NEE Equity reflected in noncontrolling interests.
During 2023, XPLR acquired interests in various projects as discussed in Note 3. In January 2023, XPLR completed the sale of a 62 MW wind project located in North Dakota and in December 2023, XPLR sold its Texas pipelines which has been presented as discontinued operations (see Note 2 – Disposal of Wind Project and – Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations and Note 4). In January 2025, XPLR announced a strategic repositioning, including suspension of the distribution to its common unitholders and in September 2025, indirect subsidiaries of XPLR completed the sale of their ownership interests in Meade, which owned the Meade pipeline investment, which has been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Note 2 – Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations and Note 4). XPLR is evaluating options relating to the assets underlying XPLR Renewables III, LLC, including a potential sale. In February 2026, a subsidiary of XPLR signed a sale and co-investment agreement with a subsidiary of NEER under which XPLR will sell certain interconnection assets and rights at certain sites and has the option to co-invest with NEER at four of those sites from 25% up to 49% in new battery storage projects. See Note 2 – Sale and Co-investment Agreement.
A number of legislative, executive and administrative activities occurred in 2025 that affect XPLR including 1) the enactment of the OBBBA which, among other things, modified tax legislation affecting clean energy tax credits, 2) the issuance of a number of federal executive orders and presidential actions, 3) the imposition of tariffs on a variety of imports, and 4) the issuance of guidance by various federal agencies. A number of similar activities remain pending or are in various phases of implementation, such as certain Treasury Department rulemaking authorized by the OBBBA, trade investigations that may lead to additional tariffs or place limitations on imports of certain materials and ordered reviews of, or process or policy changes with respect to, federal permitting and approvals for wind and solar projects. There has been no material impact on XPLR's operations or financial performance as a result of these developments and XPLR believes that the previously announced wind repowering program will qualify for clean energy tax credits if placed into service as planned. XPLR will assess any further developments for potential impacts in future periods.
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| OPERATING REVENUES | $ | 1,188 | $ | 1,230 | $ | 1,078 |
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||
| Operations and maintenance | 498 | 504 | 520 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | 564 | 550 | 521 | |||
| Goodwill impairment charge | 253 | 575 | — | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes and other – net | 68 | 73 | 65 | |||
| Total operating expenses – net | 1,383 | 1,702 | 1,106 | |||
| GAINS ON DISPOSAL OF BUSINESSES/ASSETS – NET | 9 | 13 | — | |||
| OPERATING LOSS | (186) | (459) | (28) | |||
| OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (437) | (145) | (345) | |||
| Equity in earnings of equity method investees | 127 | 85 | 81 | |||
| Equity in earnings (losses) of non-economic ownership interests | (3) | 18 | 4 | |||
| Other – net | 22 | 47 | 9 | |||
| Total other income (deductions) – net | (291) | 5 | (251) | |||
| LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | (477) | (454) | (279) | |||
| INCOME TAX BENEFIT | (78) | (42) | (25) | |||
| LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | (399) | (412) | (254) | |||
| INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(8), $(4), and $59, respectively | (37) | 1 | 472 | |||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) | (436) | (411) | 218 | |||
| NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS | 408 | 388 | (18) | |||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO XPLR | $ | (28) | $ | (23) | $ | 200 |
2025 Compared to 2024
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues primarily consist of income from the sale of energy under XPLR's PPAs, partly offset by the net amortization of intangible assets – PPAs and intangible liabilities – PPAs (see Note 2 – Intangible Assets – PPAs and – Intangible Liabilities – PPAs). Wind and solar resource levels, weather conditions and the performance of XPLR's renewable energy portfolio represent significant factors that could affect XPLR's operating results because these variables impact energy sales. XPLR utilizes the wind production index to determine the impact of wind resource levels. The wind production index represents a measure of the actual wind speeds available for energy production for a stated period relative to long-term average wind speeds. XPLR compares the actual wind speeds observed at each wind facility applied to turbine-specific power curves to produce the estimated MWh production for a stated period to the estimated long-term average wind speeds at each wind facility applied to the same turbine-specific power curves to produce the long-term average MWh production which results in the current period wind production index to determine the impact of wind resource for the stated period. Additionally, any investments to improve and expand XPLR's existing portfolio, including repowering of renewable energy projects, or any investment opportunities in areas adjacent to its existing clean energy assets could impact future revenues.
Operating revenues decreased $42 million during the year ended December 31, 2025. The decrease primarily reflects lower revenues of approximately $41 million due to absence of a customer's settlement payment on the early termination of a PPA in 2024, $27 million due to unfavorable wind resource (97% of long-term average wind speeds in 2025 compared to 98% in 2024) and $12 million relating to the absence of prior year impacts from an amendment to a derivative contract, partly offset by $33 million due to higher prices for wind and higher revenues from storage and solar resource.
Operating Expenses
Operations and Maintenance
O&M expenses include interconnection costs, labor expenses, equipment servicing costs, land payments, insurance, materials, supplies, shared services and administrative expenses attributable to XPLR's projects, and costs and expenses under the MSA, ASAs and O&M agreements (see Note 15). O&M expenses also include the cost of maintaining and replacing certain parts for the projects in the portfolio to maintain, over the long term, operating income or operating capacity.
Table of Contents
O&M expenses decreased $6 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily relating to vendor credits for unplanned O&M expenses, partly offset by dismantlement costs associated with repowering of wind facilities and higher land lease and rent expense.
O&M expenses related to the existing portfolio are expected to remain relatively stable from year to year. However, XPLR's O&M expenses would likely increase if it acquires new projects.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense reflects costs associated with depreciation and amortization of XPLR's assets, based on depreciable asset lives and consistent depreciation methodologies. For certain of the renewable energy projects, CITCs are recorded as a reduction in property, plant and equipment – net on the consolidated balance sheets and amortized as a reduction to depreciation and amortization expense over the estimated life of the related property. Depreciation and amortization expense also includes a provision for wind and solar facility dismantlement, asset removal costs and accretion related to asset retirement obligations and the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $14 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily due to depreciation and amortization associated with wind site repower projects in 2025.
Goodwill Impairment Charge
The $253 million goodwill impairment charge recognized during the year ended December 31, 2025 reflects the non-cash goodwill impairment charge recognized in March 2025 and the $575 million goodwill impairment charge recognized during the year ended December 31, 2024 reflects the non-cash goodwill impairment charge recognized in the fourth quarter of 2024. See Note 7 – Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements.
Other Income (Deductions)
Interest Expense
Interest expense primarily consists of interest under long-term debt agreements and mark-to-market gains and losses on interest rate contracts. Interest expense increased $292 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily reflecting approximately $201 million of unfavorable mark-to-market activity ($92 million of losses recorded in 2025 compared to $109 million of gains recorded in 2024) and $91 million of higher interest expense due to higher average debt outstanding. See Note 6 – Financial Statement Impact of Derivative Instruments and Note 13.
Equity in Earnings of Equity Method Investees
Equity in earnings of equity method investees increased $42 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily due to an approximately $28 million gain on sale of an equity method investment in solar distributed generation assets in September 2025 and favorable mark-to-market activity on interest rate contracts and lower interest expense in 2025.
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Non-Economic Ownership Interests
Equity in earnings of non-economic ownership interests decreased $21 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily reflecting an unwinding of non-economic ownership interests in 2025. See Note 11.
Other – net
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the decrease in other – net primarily reflects the absence of interest income from NEER on cash sweep amounts held relating to the proceeds from the December 2023 sale of the Texas pipelines (see Note 4 and Note 15), partly offset by interest income earned on cash on hand.
Income Tax Benefit
XPLR recognizes in income its applicable ownership share of income taxes due to the disregarded tax status of substantially all of the projects under XPLR OpCo. Net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests includes minimal income taxes.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, XPLR recorded income tax benefit of $78 million on loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $477 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 16%. The tax benefit is primarily comprised of federal tax benefit of approximately $100 million at the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21%, $56 million of clean energy tax credits and $6 million of state income taxes, partly offset by tax expense of $82 million related to tax attributable to noncontrolling interests. See Note 8.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, XPLR recorded income tax benefit of $42 million on loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $454 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 9%. The tax benefit is primarily comprised of federal tax benefit of approximately $95 million at the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% and $32 million of clean energy tax credits, partly offset by tax expense of $85 million related to tax attributable to noncontrolling interests. See Note 8.
Table of Contents
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 reflects the results of the Meade pipeline investment and interest on related project-level indebtedness prior to the sale in September 2025. See Note 4.
Net Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily reflects the net income or loss attributable to NEE Equity's noncontrolling interest in XPLR OpCo, a non-affiliated party's interest in Star Moon Holdings, LLC, the loss allocated to differential membership interest investors, the income allocated to Class B noncontrolling membership interests and NEER's noncontrolling ownership interests in Silver State South Solar, LLC, Sunlight Renewables Holdings, LLC and Emerald Breeze Holdings, LLC.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the change in net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily reflects lower net income attributable to Class B noncontrolling interest of $62 million ($246 million in 2025 compared to $308 million in 2024), primarily due to the purchase of the Class B membership interests in XPLR Renewables II, LLC (XPLR Renewables II) in April 2025 and XPLR Infrastructure Pipelines, LLC (XPLR Pipelines) in September 2025, and the change in the net income or loss attributable to NEE Equity's noncontrolling interests of $36 million ($32 million net loss in 2025 compared to $4 million of net income in 2024), partly offset by lower net loss allocated to differential membership interest investors of $82 million ($701 million in 2025 compared to $783 million in 2024). See Note 2 – Noncontrolling Interests and Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests.
2024 Compared to 2023
The comparison of the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 is included in Management's Discussion in XPLR's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, except for those line items discussed below which were impacted by the sale of ownership interests in Meade and resulting presentation as discontinued operations. See Note 4.
Other Income (Deductions)
Interest Expense
Interest expense primarily consists of interest under long-term debt agreements and mark-to-market gains and losses on interest rate contracts. Interest expense decreased $200 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 primarily reflecting approximately $243 million of favorable mark-to-market activity ($109 million of gains recorded in 2024 compared to $134 million of losses recorded in 2023), partly offset by $30 million of higher interest expense due to higher interest rates on the average debt outstanding and $15 million relating to projects acquired in 2023.
Equity in Earnings of Equity Method Investees
Equity in earnings of equity method investees increased $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 primarily due to favorable mark-to-market activity on interest rate contracts in 2024.
Income Tax Benefit
For the year ended December 31, 2024, XPLR recorded income tax benefit of $42 million on loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $454 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 9%. The tax benefit is primarily comprised of federal tax benefit of approximately $95 million at the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% and $32 million of clean energy tax credits, partly offset by tax expense of $85 million related to tax attributable to noncontrolling interests. See Note 8.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, XPLR recorded income tax benefit of $25 million on income from continuing operations before income taxes of $279 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 9%. The income tax benefit is primarily comprised of federal tax benefit of approximately $59 million at the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% and $28 million of clean energy tax credits, partly offset by $59 million related to tax attributable to noncontrolling interests. See Note 8.
Income from Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations decreased approximately $471 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 which primarily reflects the absence of the gain recognized on the sale of the Texas pipelines of approximately $375 million ($329 million after tax) and $122 million relating to the operations for the Texas pipelines in 2023, and the change in results of the Meade pipeline investment and interest on related project-level indebtedness of $21 million ($1 million in 2024 compared to $22 million in 2023). See Note 4.
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
XPLR’s ongoing operations use cash to fund O&M expenses, including related party fees discussed in Note 15, maintenance capital expenditures, debt service payments and related derivative obligations (see Note 13 and Note 6) and distributions to the holders of noncontrolling interests. XPLR expects to satisfy these requirements primarily with cash on hand and cash generated from operations. In addition, XPLR expects to consider additional repowering opportunities at its existing projects and other investment opportunities, and to exercise buyout rights relating to noncontrolling Class B members' interests under certain limited liability company agreements to which XPLR and certain of its subsidiaries is a party (see Note 2 – Noncontrolling Interests and Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests). The investment, development and buyout opportunities are expected to be funded with borrowings under credit facilities or term loans, issuances of indebtedness or capital raised pursuant to other financing structures, cash on hand and cash generated from operations and sales of clean energy tax credits (see Note 2 – Income Taxes), and may be funded with divestitures or issuances of additional XPLR common units, including under its at-the-market equity issuance program (ATM program). XPLR may also utilize non-voting common units (convertible into common units) to fund the payment of specified portions of the purchase price payable in connection with the exercise of certain buyout rights (see Note 2 – Noncontrolling Interests and Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests). In addition, XPLR expects to fund debt maturities through refinancing. XPLR may, but does not expect to, issue common units to satisfy XPLR's conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes upon conversion (see Note 13).
These sources of funds are expected to be adequate to provide for XPLR's short-term and long-term liquidity and capital needs, although its ability to fund repowering of existing projects, fund battery storage and other investment opportunities, fund the purchase price payable in connection with the exercise of buyout rights, refinance debt maturities and return capital to common unitholders will depend on its ability to access capital on acceptable terms.
As a normal part of its business, depending on market conditions, XPLR expects from time to time to consider opportunities to repay, redeem, repurchase or refinance its indebtedness or equity arrangements. If available, additional debt financing, including refinancing, could impose operating restrictions, additional cash payment obligations and additional covenants, such as limitations on distributions to common unitholders.
XPLR OpCo has agreed to allow NEER or one of its affiliates to withdraw funds received by XPLR OpCo or its subsidiaries and to hold those funds in accounts of NEER or one of its affiliates to the extent the funds are not required to pay project costs or otherwise required to be maintained by XPLR's subsidiaries, until the financing agreements permit distributions to be made, or, in the case of XPLR OpCo, until such funds are required to make distributions or to pay expenses or other operating costs. XPLR OpCo will have a claim for any funds that NEER fails to return:
• when required by its subsidiaries’ financings;
• when its subsidiaries’ financings otherwise permit distributions to be made to XPLR OpCo;
• when funds are required to be returned to XPLR OpCo; or
• when otherwise demanded by XPLR OpCo.
In addition, NEER and certain of its affiliates may withdraw funds in connection with certain long-term debt agreements and hold those funds in accounts belonging to NEER or its affiliates and provide credit support in the amount of such withdrawn funds. If NEER fails to return withdrawn funds when required by XPLR OpCo's subsidiaries’ financing agreements, the lenders will be entitled to draw on any credit support provided by NEER in the amount of such withdrawn funds.
If NEER or one of its affiliates realizes any earnings on the withdrawn funds prior to the return of such funds, it will be permitted to retain those earnings, and will not pay interest on the withdrawn funds except as otherwise agreed upon with XPLR OpCo.
Liquidity Position
At December 31, 2025, XPLR's liquidity position was approximately $3,421 million. The table below provides the components of XPLR’s liquidity position:
| December 31, 2025 | Maturity Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (millions) | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 960 | |
| Amounts due under the CSCS agreement | 11 | ||
| Revolving credit facility(a)(b) | 2,450 | 2029 | |
| Total | $ | 3,421 |
____________________
(a) At December 31, 2025, approximately $90 million of the XPLR OpCo credit facility expires in 2028. In February 2026, XPLR OpCo updated the total capacity for the revolving credit facility to $1,250 million and extended the maturity date to 2031.
(b) Excludes term loan facilities discussed below due to restrictions on the use of the borrowings. See Note 13.
Table of Contents
Management believes that XPLR's liquidity position and cash flows from operations will be adequate to finance O&M expenses, maintenance capital expenditures and liquidity commitments. Management continues to regularly monitor XPLR's financing needs consistent with prudent balance sheet management.
Financing Arrangements
As of February 17, 2026, XPLR OpCo and its direct subsidiary are parties to a $1,250 million revolving credit facility (XPLR OpCo credit facility) which matures in February 2031. In order to borrow or to have letters of credit issued under the XPLR OpCo credit facility as well as to avoid default and related acceleration provisions, XPLR OpCo and its direct subsidiary are required to, among other things, be in compliance with financial covenants of a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, as defined in the XPLR OpCo credit facility. At December 31, 2025, XPLR and its direct subsidiary were in compliance with these required ratios. Under the XPLR OpCo credit facility, XPLR OpCo's ability to pay cash distributions is subject to certain other restrictions. For a discussion of the XPLR OpCo credit facility, see Note 13.
During 2025, XPLR OpCo issued $825 million of 8.375% senior unsecured notes due 2031, $925 million of 8.625% senior unsecured notes due 2033 and $750 million of 7.750% senior unsecured notes due 2034. Additionally, during 2025, XPLR repaid $600 million principal amount of senior unsecured convertible notes and XPLR OpCo repurchased $467 million of its outstanding 3.875% senior unsecured notes due 2026. Also during 2025, certain indirect subsidiaries of XPLR entered into three limited-recourse senior secured variable rate term loan facilities (term loan facilities) to finance certain wind repowering projects totaling $1,597 million, which mature in 2030. As of December 31, 2025, XPLR subsidiaries have borrowed approximately $942 million under the term loan facilities and as of February 17, 2026, up to $655 million was available under the term loan facilities, subject to specified conditions. See Note 13.
During 2024, approximately $330 million was drawn under the XPLR OpCo credit facility and in March 2025 this same amount was repaid. Also during 2024, XPLR repaid $500 million principal amount of senior unsecured convertible notes and XPLR OpCo repaid $750 million principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured notes.
During 2023, XPLR OpCo issued $750 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.25% senior unsecured notes due in 2029 and, in connection with projects acquired, an indirect subsidiary of XPLR borrowed approximately $330 million under a senior secured limited-recourse variable rate term loan facility maturing in 2028. Also during 2023, an indirect subsidiary of XPLR borrowed approximately $237 million under a revolving credit facility and in December 2023, as part of the sale of the Texas pipelines, $437 million outstanding under the credit agreement was paid off which included a $200 million term loan. See Note 13.
XPLR OpCo and certain indirect subsidiaries are also subject to financings that contain financial covenants and distribution tests, including debt service coverage ratios. In general, these financings contain covenants customary for these types of financings, including limitations on investments and restricted payments. Certain of XPLR's financings provide for interest payable at a fixed interest rate. However, certain of XPLR's financings accrue interest at variable rates based on an underlying index plus a margin. Interest rate contracts were entered into for certain of these financings to hedge against interest rate movements with respect to interest payments on the related borrowings. In addition, under the project-level financing structures, each project or group of projects will be permitted to pay distributions out of available cash so long as certain conditions are satisfied, including that reserves are funded with cash or credit support, no default or event of default under the applicable financing has occurred and is continuing at the time of such distribution or would result therefrom, and each project or group of projects is otherwise in compliance with the related covenants. For substantially all of the project-level financing structures, minimum debt service coverage ratios must be satisfied in order to make a distribution. For one project-level financing, the project must maintain a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio in order to make a distribution. At December 31, 2025, XPLR and its subsidiaries were in compliance with all financial debt covenants under their financings.
Equity Arrangements
Certain XPLR OpCo subsidiaries have issued and sold noncontrolling Class B membership interests in their subsidiaries. XPLR has buyout rights, subject to certain limitations and/or extensions, under which XPLR has the right to pay a portion of the buyout price with respect to the noncontrolling Class B membership interests in XPLR non-voting common units or XPLR common units, as specified in the related limited liability company agreement. The noncontrolling Class B investors receive a specified allocation of the related subsidiaries' distributable cash, which would increase if certain minimum buyout rights are not exercised prior to specified deadlines. While XPLR has the right to exercise the buyout right to purchase the noncontrolling Class B membership interests during a specified period of time as set forth in the related limited liability company agreement and may exercise the buyout right by paying cash, XPLR may exercise, or begin to exercise if exercisable only in part, the buyout right on or at the beginning of the buyout period, and the buyout price may consist of the maximum percentage of XPLR non-voting common units or XPLR common units, as specified in the related limited liability company agreement. See Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests.
In 2025, XPLR purchased the remaining outstanding Class B membership interests in XPLR Pipelines for approximately $219 million and the remaining Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II for $931 million. See Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests.
Table of Contents
In 2024, XPLR paid aggregate consideration of approximately $187 million in cash for the buyout of 15% of the originally issued Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II, and $67 million in cash for the buyout of 25% of the originally issued Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Pipelines. In 2023, XPLR paid aggregate consideration of approximately $792 million in cash for the buyout of all of the Class B noncontrolling membership interests in South Texas Midstream, LLC, XPLR's subsidiary which owned natural gas pipelines in Texas (see Note 4), and $180 million in cash for the buyout of 15% of the originally issued Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II. See Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests.
XPLR has an ATM program, which was renewed in 2023, pursuant to which XPLR may issue, from time to time, up to $500 million of its common units. During 2025 and 2024, XPLR did not issue any common units under the ATM program. During 2023, XPLR issued approximately 5.1 million common units under the ATM program for gross proceeds of approximately $316 million. As of December 31, 2025, XPLR may issue up to approximately $337 million in additional common units under the ATM program. See Note 14 – ATM Program.
During 2023, XPLR issued approximately 1.7 million XPLR common units upon NEE Equity's exchange of XPLR OpCo common units on a one-for-one basis.
In July 2024, XPLR filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC for an unspecified amount of securities, which became effective upon filing. The amount of securities issuable by XPLR is established from time to time by the board. Securities that may be issued under the registration statement include common units, preferred units, warrants, rights, debt securities, equity purchase contracts and equity purchase units.
Capital Expenditures
Annual capital spending plans are developed based on projected requirements for the projects. Capital expenditures primarily represent the estimated cost of capital improvements, including development and construction expenditures that are expected to increase XPLR OpCo’s operating income or operating capacity over the long term. Capital expenditures for projects that have already commenced commercial operations are generally not significant because most expenditures relate to repairs and maintenance and are expensed when incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR had capital expenditures of approximately $958 million and $241 million, respectively, which primarily relate to wind turbine repowering. Estimates of planned capital expenditures, including those relating to expected repowering of existing projects, are subject to continuing review and adjustments and actual capital expenditures may vary significantly from these estimates.
Cash Distributions to Unitholders
XPLR's partnership agreement requires it to distribute all of its available cash quarterly. Generally, available cash is all cash on hand at the date of determination relating to that quarter (including any expected distributions from XPLR OpCo), less the amount of cash reserves established by the board. XPLR currently expects that any cash on hand at the date of determination relating to that quarter would be reserved by the board to provide for the proper conduct of XPLR's business. Cash flow is generated from distributions XPLR receives from XPLR OpCo each quarter. XPLR expects XPLR OpCo to establish cash reserves prior to making distributions, if any, to XPLR to pay costs and expenses of XPLR's subsidiaries, in addition to XPLR's expenses, as well as any debt service requirements, future capital expenditures and to provide for the exercise of the buyout rights relating to noncontrolling Class B members' interest under certain limited liability company agreements to which XPLR and certain of its subsidiaries is a party or by which it is bound, or its assets are subject, or otherwise for the proper conduct of XPLR OpCo's business.
XPLR OpCo's partnership agreement requires it to distribute all of its available cash to its unitholders, including XPLR, each quarter. However, XPLR OpCo GP may reserve cash that otherwise would be available for distribution to unitholders, including XPLR, for other business purposes in its discretion. Generally, XPLR OpCo's available cash is all cash on hand at the date of determination relating to that quarter, plus any funds borrowed, less the amount of cash reserves established by XPLR OpCo GP. The majority of such available cash is expected to be derived from the operations of the projects and could fluctuate from quarter to quarter, and in some cases significantly, as a result of the performance of the projects, seasonality, fluctuating wind and solar resource, maintenance and outage schedules, timing of debt service and other factors. XPLR OpCo currently expects that any cash on hand at the date of determination relating to that quarter would be reserved to pay costs and expenses of XPLR's subsidiaries, in addition to XPLR's expenses, as well as any debt service requirements, future capital expenditures and to provide for the exercise of the buyout rights relating to noncontrolling Class B members' interest under certain limited liability company agreements to which XPLR and certain of its subsidiaries is a party or by which it is bound, or its assets are subject, or otherwise for the proper conduct of XPLR OpCo's business.
In January 2025, as part of a strategic repositioning, XPLR's board and XPLR OpCo GP reserved cash for other business purposes as described above and accordingly XPLR suspended distributions to its common unitholders. Throughout 2025, XPLR's board and XPLR OpCo GP have continued to reserve cash for other business purposes as described above.
During 2024, XPLR distributed approximately $335 million to its common unitholders.
Table of Contents
Credit Ratings
XPLR’s liquidity, ability to access credit and capital markets and cost of borrowings is dependent on its credit ratings. At February 17, 2026, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s), S&P Global Ratings (S&P) and Fitch Ratings, Inc. (Fitch) had assigned the following credit ratings to XPLR:
| Moody's(a) | S&P(a) | Fitch(a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPLR corporate credit rating(b) | Ba1 | BB | BB+ |
_________________________
(a) A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and should be evaluated independently of any other rating. The rating is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization.
(b) The outlook indicated by each of Moody's and Fitch is stable. The outlook indicated by S&P is negative.
Cash Flows
The following table reflects the cash flows for the comparative periods:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 739 | $ | 800 | $ | 731 |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | $ | 630 | $ | 1,236 | $ | (194) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (674) | $ | (2,002) | $ | (527) |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities in 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily driven by the absence of a customer's settlement payment on the early termination of a PPA which occurred in 2024, lower revenue due to unfavorable wind resource and the timing of transactions impacting working capital.
Net Cash Provided by (Used) in Investing Activities
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Acquisitions of membership interests in subsidiaries – net | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (661) |
| Capital expenditures and other investments | (958) | (241) | (1,269) | |||
| Proceeds from sale of a business | — | — | 1,885 | |||
| Proceeds from sale of equity method investments | 1,139 | — | — | |||
| Payments from (to) related parties under CSCS agreement – net | 116 | 1,384 | (1,213) | |||
| Distributions from non-economic ownership interests | 309 | — | — | |||
| Reimbursements from related parties for capital expenditures | — | 66 | 1,063 | |||
| Other – net | 24 | 27 | 1 | |||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | $ | 630 | $ | 1,236 | $ | (194) |
The change in net cash provided by investing activities in 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily driven by lower payments received from NEER subsidiaries (net of amounts paid) under the CSCS agreement and higher capital expenditures and other investments, net of reimbursements, partly offset by proceeds from the sale of equity method investments and distributions from non-economic ownership interests.
Table of Contents
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common units – net | $ | 4 | $ | 3 | $ | 315 |
| Issuances (retirements) of long-term debt – net | 945 | (991) | 839 | |||
| Partner contributions (distributions) – net | (371) | (753) | (741) | |||
| Proceeds related to differential membership interests – net | 144 | 114 | 207 | |||
| Buyout of differential membership investors | (75) | (16) | (187) | |||
| Proceeds (payments) related to Class B noncontrolling interests – net | (86) | (92) | 31 | |||
| Buyout of Class B noncontrolling interest investors | (1,150) | (254) | (972) | |||
| Debt issuance costs | (73) | (2) | (12) | |||
| Other – net | (12) | (11) | (7) | |||
| Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (674) | $ | (2,002) | $ | (527) |
The change in net cash used in financing activities in 2025 compared to 2024 primarily reflects issuances of long-term debt in 2025 compared to retirements in 2024 and lower partner distributions, partly offset by larger buyouts of Class B noncontrolling interest investors and differential membership investors.
The comparison of the cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 are included in Management's Discussion in XPLR's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Critical accounting estimates are those that XPLR believes are both most important to the portrayal of its financial condition and results of operations, and require complex, subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make assumptions about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the critical accounting estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. XPLR's significant accounting policies, including those requiring critical accounting estimates, are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, which were prepared under generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. Further details regarding XPLR's critical accounting estimates are as follows:
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense. In evaluating XPLR's ability to recover its deferred tax assets individually by entity and by taxing jurisdiction, XPLR considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In projecting future taxable income, XPLR begins with historical results and incorporates assumptions including the amount of future state, U.S. federal and foreign pretax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates XPLR is using to manage the underlying businesses.
Accounting Standards Codification 740 – Income Taxes (ASC 740) provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position will be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. ASC 740 also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and disclosure and transition.
XPLR recognizes tax liabilities in accordance with ASC 740 and adjusts these liabilities when its judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Because of the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from XPLR's current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they are determined.
See Note 8.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
XPLR evaluates long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Table of Contents
An impairment loss is required to be recognized if the carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted future net cash flows associated with that asset. The impairment loss to be recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds the asset’s fair value. In most instances, the fair value is determined by discounting estimated future cash flows using an appropriate interest rate.
The amount of future net cash flows, the timing of such cash flows and the determination of an appropriate interest rate all involve estimates and judgments about future events. In particular, the aggregate amount of cash flows determines whether an impairment exists, and the timing of the cash flows is critical in determining fair value for the purposes of determining the impairment loss to be recognized. Because each assessment is based on the facts and circumstances associated with each long-lived asset, the effects of changes in assumptions cannot be generalized.
Carrying Value of Equity Method Investments
XPLR evaluates its equity method investments for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value and the investment may be other-than-temporarily impaired.
Indicators of a potential impairment include, but are not limited to, a series of operating losses of an investee, the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity and a current fair value of an investment that may be less than its carrying value. If indicators of impairment exist, an estimate of the investment’s fair value will be calculated. Approaches for estimating fair value include, among others, an income approach using a probability-weighted discounted cash flows model and a market approach using an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiple model. The probability assigned to each scenario as well as the cash flows and EBITDA multiple identified are critical in determining fair value.
An impairment loss is required to be recognized if the impairment is deemed to be other than temporary. Assessment of whether an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired involves, among other factors, consideration of the length of time that the fair value is below the carrying value, current expected performance relative to the expected performance when the investment was initially made, performance relative to peers, industry performance relative to the economy, credit rating, regulatory actions and legal and permitting challenges. If management is unable to reasonably assert that an impairment is temporary or believes that there will not be full recovery of the carrying value of its investment, then the impairment is considered to be other than temporary. Investments that are other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to their estimated fair value and cannot subsequently be written back up for increases in estimated fair value. Impairment losses, if any, would be recorded in equity in earnings of equity method investees in XPLR’s consolidated statements of income (loss). See Note 7 – Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements regarding an impairment loss on one of XPLR's equity method investments which occurred during 2024.
Purchase Accounting
Certain assumptions and estimates are employed in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and, for business acquisitions, in determining the allocation of goodwill to a reporting unit. These estimates may be affected by factors such as changing market conditions, technological advances in the energy industry or changes in regulations governing that industry. Other key inputs that require judgment include discount rates, comparable market transactions, estimated useful lives and probability of future transactions. The most significant assumptions requiring the most judgment involve identifying and estimating the fair value of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment and the associated useful lives for establishing amortization periods. To finalize purchase accounting for significant transactions, XPLR may utilize the services of independent valuation specialists to assist in the determination of the fair value of acquired intangible assets and property, plant and equipment. For business acquisitions, the allocation of the purchase price may be modified up to one year from the date of the acquisition if new information is obtained about the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. See Note 3.
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Generally, a long-lived asset to be sold is classified as held for sale in the period in which management, with approval from the board, commits to a plan to sell and a sale is expected to be completed within one year. Assets and liabilities held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying value or their estimated fair value less cost to sell. If the disposal group reflects a component of a reporting unit and meets the definition of a business, the goodwill within that reporting unit is allocated to the disposal group based on the relative fair value of the components representing a business that will be retained and disposed. Goodwill is not allocated to a portion of a reporting unit that does not meet the definition of a business. A disposal group that meets held for sale criteria and also represents a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the entity's operations and financial results is reflected as discontinued operations in the statements of income and prior periods are recast to reflect the earnings or losses from such business as income from discontinued operations, net of tax expense. See Note 4.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
XPLR is exposed to market risks in its normal business activities. Market risk is measured as the potential loss that may result from hypothetical reasonably possible market changes associated with its business over the next year. The types of market risks include interest rate and counterparty credit risks.
Interest Rate Risk
XPLR is exposed to risk resulting from changes in interest rates associated with outstanding and expected future debt issuances and borrowings. XPLR manages interest rate exposure by monitoring current interest rates, entering into interest rate contracts and using a combination of fixed rate and variable rate debt. Interest rate swaps are used to mitigate and adjust interest rate exposure when deemed appropriate based upon market conditions or when required by financing agreements (see Note 6).
XPLR has long-term debt instruments that subject it to the risk of loss associated with movements in market interest rates. At December 31, 2025, approximately 98% of the long-term debt, including current maturities, was not exposed to fluctuations in interest expense as it was either fixed rate debt or financially hedged. At December 31, 2025, the estimated fair value of XPLR's long-term debt was approximately $6.3 billion and the carrying value of the long-term debt was $6.2 billion. See Note 7 – Financial Instruments Recorded at Other than Fair Value. Based upon a hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates, the fair value of XPLR's long-term debt would increase by approximately $122 million at December 31, 2025.
At December 31, 2025, XPLR had interest rate contracts with a net notional amount of approximately $2.2 billion related to managing exposure to the variability of cash flows associated with outstanding and expected future debt issuances and borrowings. Based upon a hypothetical 10% decrease in rates, XPLR’s net derivative assets at December 31, 2025 would decrease by approximately $44 million.
Counterparty Credit Risk
Risks surrounding counterparty performance and credit risk could ultimately impact the amount and timing of expected cash flows. Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from non-performance or non-payment by counterparties under the terms of their contractual obligations. XPLR monitors and manages credit risk through credit policies that include a credit approval process and the use of credit mitigation measures such as prepayment arrangements in certain circumstances. XPLR also seeks to mitigate counterparty risk by having a diversified portfolio of counterparties.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See Management's Discussion – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Table of Contents
Item. 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
XPLR Infrastructure, LP's (XPLR) management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The consolidated financial statements, which in part are based on informed judgments and estimates made by management, have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.
To aid in carrying out this responsibility, we, along with all other members of management, maintain a system of internal accounting control which is established after weighing the cost of such controls against the benefits derived. In the opinion of management, the overall system of internal accounting control provides reasonable assurance that the assets of XPLR and its subsidiaries are safeguarded and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and are properly recorded for the preparation of financial statements. In addition, management believes the overall system of internal accounting control provides reasonable assurance that material errors or irregularities would be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their duties. Any system of internal accounting control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that controls can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and reporting.
The system of internal accounting control is supported by written policies and guidelines, the selection and training of qualified employees, an organizational structure that provides an appropriate division of responsibility and a program of internal auditing. XPLR's written policies include a Code of Business Conduct & Ethics that states management's policy on conflicts of interest and ethical conduct. Compliance with the Code of Business Conduct & Ethics is confirmed annually by key personnel.
The Board of Directors pursues its oversight responsibility for financial reporting and accounting through its Audit Committee. This Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, meets regularly with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors to make inquiries as to the manner in which the responsibilities of each are being discharged. The independent auditors and the internal audit staff have free access to the Committee without management present to discuss auditing, internal accounting control and financial reporting matters.
Management assessed the effectiveness of XPLR's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management believes that XPLR's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2025.
XPLR's independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, is engaged to express an opinion on XPLR's consolidated financial statements and an opinion on XPLR's internal control over financial reporting. Their reports are based on procedures believed by them to provide a reasonable basis to support such opinions. These reports appear on the following pages.
| S. ALAN LIU | JESSICA GEOFFROY |
|---|---|
| S. Alan Liu<br><br>President and Chief Executive Officer<br><br>XPLR Infrastructure, LP | Jessica Geoffroy<br><br>Chief Financial Officer<br><br>XPLR Infrastructure, LP |
| WILLIAM J. GOUGH | |
| --- | |
| William J. Gough<br><br>Controller<br><br>XPLR Infrastructure, LP |
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the unitholders and the Board of Directors of
XPLR Infrastructure, LP
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of XPLR Infrastructure, LP and subsidiaries (XPLR) as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, XPLR maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025, of XPLR and our report dated February 17, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
XPLR’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on XPLR's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to XPLR in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boca Raton, Florida
February 17, 2026
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the unitholders and the Board of Directors of
XPLR Infrastructure, LP
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of XPLR Infrastructure, LP and subsidiaries (XPLR) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of XPLR as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), XPLR’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 17, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion on XPLR’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of XPLR’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on XPLR's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to XPLR in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Income Taxes – Qualification of repowered projects under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) — Refer to Income Tax Expense (Benefit) on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
Critical Audit Matter Description
XPLR is investing capital in its existing assets through wind repowering. The repowered wind facilities qualify for new 10-year Production Tax Credits (PTCs). PTCs are recorded in Income Tax Expense (Benefit) within the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Qualification for PTCs under the IRC requires management to estimate fair value of new and used components. Retrofitted facilities may qualify for PTCs if the cost basis of the new investment is at least 80% of the retrofitted facility’s total fair value.
The fair value measurements were based on significant estimates and assumptions, including the projected timing and amount of future cash flows and discount rates that reflect the risk inherent in future cash flows and future market prices. The audit of the accounting conclusions for these transactions required a high degree of auditor judgment and specialized skills and knowledge. Auditing the criteria used by management and third-party specialists to determine qualification under the IRC involved subjective judgments and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our firm specialists who possess significant quantitative and modeling expertise.
Table of Contents
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures included the following, among others:
•We tested the effectiveness of controls over the evaluation of repowered assets to qualify for additional PTCs, including management’s review of the third-party specialists’ valuation reports.
•We evaluated the competency of third-party specialists engaged by management.
•We read the third-party valuation reports.
•For the fair value of new property, we tested the capital expenditures for the year.
•With the assistance of our tax specialists, we audited the methodology used for qualification of repowered projects under the requirements of the IRC and that the expenditures qualified under such requirements.
•With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we (1) evaluated the reasonableness of (a) the valuation methodology, and (b) the discount rates, including developing a range of independent estimates and comparing those to the discount rates selected by management, and (2) assessed the mathematical accuracy of the calculations.
•We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts of future cash flows by comparing the projections to historical inputs or similar generation facilities. We used personnel in our firm who specialize in energy transacting to assist in testing certain assumptions in management's forecasts of future cash flows.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boca Raton, Florida
February 17, 2026
We have served as XPLR's auditor since 2014.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(millions, except per unit amounts)
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| OPERATING REVENUES(a) | $ | 1,188 | $ | 1,230 | $ | 1,078 |
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||
| Operations and maintenance(b) | 498 | 504 | 520 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | 564 | 550 | 521 | |||
| Goodwill impairment charge | 253 | 575 | — | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes and other – net | 68 | 73 | 65 | |||
| Total operating expenses – net | 1,383 | 1,702 | 1,106 | |||
| GAINS ON DISPOSAL OF BUSINESSES/ASSETS – NET | 9 | 13 | — | |||
| OPERATING LOSS | (186) | (459) | (28) | |||
| OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (437) | (145) | (345) | |||
| Equity in earnings of equity method investees | 127 | 85 | 81 | |||
| Equity in earnings (losses) of non-economic ownership interests | (3) | 18 | 4 | |||
| Other – net | 22 | 47 | 9 | |||
| Total other income (deductions) – net | (291) | 5 | (251) | |||
| LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | (477) | (454) | (279) | |||
| INCOME TAX BENEFIT | (78) | (42) | (25) | |||
| LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | (399) | (412) | (254) | |||
| INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(8), $(4), and $59, respectively | (37) | 1 | 472 | |||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) | (436) | (411) | 218 | |||
| NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS | 408 | 388 | (18) | |||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO XPLR | $ | (28) | $ | (23) | $ | 200 |
| Earnings (loss) per common unit attributable to XPLR – basic and assuming dilution: | ||||||
| From continuing operations | $ | (0.07) | $ | (0.13) | $ | 0.35 |
| From discontinued operations | (0.23) | (0.12) | 1.83 | |||
| Earnings (loss) per common unit attributable to XPLR – basic and assuming dilution | $ | (0.30) | $ | (0.25) | $ | 2.18 |
____________________
(a) Includes related party revenues of approximately $37 million, $17 million and $(12) million for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(b) Total O&M expenses presented includes related party amounts of approximately $134 million, $160 million and $133 million for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(millions)
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | (436) | $ | (411) | $ | 218 |
| OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income related to equity method investee (net of $0 tax expense, $0 tax expense and $0 tax expense, respectively) | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Total other comprehensive income, net of tax | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | (434) | (410) | 220 | |||
| Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 407 | 388 | (20) | |||
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO XPLR | $ | (27) | $ | (22) | $ | 200 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(millions)
| December 31, | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
| ASSETS | ||||
| Current assets: | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 960 | $ | 283 |
| Accounts receivable | 102 | 105 | ||
| Other receivables | 93 | 86 | ||
| Due from related parties | 43 | 148 | ||
| Inventory | 103 | 108 | ||
| Other | 121 | 130 | ||
| Total current assets | 1,422 | 860 | ||
| Other assets: | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment – net | 15,366 | 14,555 | ||
| Intangible assets – PPAs – net | 1,648 | 1,817 | ||
| Goodwill | — | 253 | ||
| Investments in equity method investees | 625 | 631 | ||
| Assets held for sale | — | 1,153 | ||
| Other | 534 | 1,023 | ||
| Total other assets | 18,173 | 19,432 | ||
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 19,595 | $ | 20,292 |
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 58 | $ | 65 |
| Due to related parties | 498 | 159 | ||
| Current portion of long-term debt | 762 | 705 | ||
| Accrued interest | 103 | 46 | ||
| Accrued property taxes | 29 | 32 | ||
| Other | 118 | 80 | ||
| Total current liabilities | 1,568 | 1,087 | ||
| Other liabilities and deferred credits: | ||||
| Long-term debt | 5,440 | 4,609 | ||
| Asset retirement obligations | 373 | 366 | ||
| Due to related parties | 93 | 43 | ||
| Intangible liabilities – PPAs – net | 1,034 | 1,121 | ||
| Other | 188 | 200 | ||
| Total other liabilities and deferred credits | 7,128 | 6,339 | ||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 8,696 | 7,426 | ||
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | ||||
| EQUITY | ||||
| Common units (94.0 and 93.5 units issued and outstanding, respectively) | 3,195 | 3,221 | ||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (5) | (6) | ||
| Noncontrolling interests | 7,709 | 9,651 | ||
| TOTAL EQUITY | 10,899 | 12,866 | ||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 19,595 | $ | 20,292 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(millions)
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (436) | $ | (411) | $ | 218 |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 564 | 550 | 553 | |||
| Intangible amortization – PPAs | 83 | 82 | 82 | |||
| Change in value of derivative contracts | 185 | (91) | 284 | |||
| Deferred income taxes | (42) | 1 | 34 | |||
| Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of distributions received | 29 | 73 | 32 | |||
| Equity in earnings (losses) of non-economic ownership interests, net of distributions received | 16 | 3 | (4) | |||
| Gains on disposal of businesses/assets – net | (9) | (13) | (375) | |||
| Goodwill impairment charge | 253 | 575 | — | |||
| Other – net | 32 | 17 | 20 | |||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||
| Current assets | 7 | (17) | (34) | |||
| Noncurrent assets | 1 | (13) | (81) | |||
| Current liabilities | 26 | 45 | (14) | |||
| Noncurrent liabilities | 30 | (1) | 16 | |||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 739 | 800 | 731 | |||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
| Acquisitions of membership interests in subsidiaries – net | — | — | (661) | |||
| Capital expenditures and other investments | (958) | (241) | (1,269) | |||
| Proceeds from sale of a business | — | — | 1,885 | |||
| Proceeds from sale of equity method investments | 1,139 | — | — | |||
| Payments from (to) related parties under CSCS agreement – net | 116 | 1,384 | (1,213) | |||
| Distributions from non-economic ownership interests | 309 | — | — | |||
| Reimbursements from related parties for capital expenditures | — | 66 | 1,063 | |||
| Other – net | 24 | 27 | 1 | |||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 630 | 1,236 | (194) | |||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common units – net | 4 | 3 | 315 | |||
| Issuances of long-term debt, including premiums and discounts | 3,448 | 354 | 2,362 | |||
| Retirements of long-term debt | (2,503) | (1,345) | (1,523) | |||
| Debt issuance costs | (73) | (2) | (12) | |||
| Partner contributions | 50 | 63 | — | |||
| Partner distributions | (421) | (816) | (741) | |||
| Proceeds on sale of Class B noncontrolling interests – net | — | — | 177 | |||
| Payments to Class B noncontrolling interest investors | (86) | (92) | (146) | |||
| Buyout of Class B noncontrolling interest investors | (1,150) | (254) | (972) | |||
| Proceeds on sale of differential membership interests | — | — | 92 | |||
| Proceeds from differential membership investors | 178 | 173 | 153 | |||
| Payments to differential membership investors | (34) | (59) | (38) | |||
| Buyout of differential membership investors | (75) | (16) | (187) | |||
| Other – net | (12) | (11) | (7) | |||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (674) | (2,002) | (527) | |||
| NET INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH | 695 | 34 | 10 | |||
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH – BEGINNING OF YEAR | 328 | 294 | 284 | |||
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH – END OF YEAR | $ | 1,023 | $ | 328 | $ | 294 |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||
| Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 167 | $ | 193 | $ | 250 |
| Cash received for income taxes – net | $ | 45 | $ | 47 | $ | 1 |
| Change in noncash investments in non-economic ownership interests – net | $ | — | $ | 216 | $ | (9) |
| Accrued property additions | $ | 495 | $ | 72 | $ | 77 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(millions)
| Common Units | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Units | Amount | Accumulated<br>Other<br>Comprehensive Income<br>(Loss) | Non-controlling<br>Interests | Total<br>Equity | Redeemable Non-controlling Interests | |||||||
| Balances, December 31, 2022 | 86.5 | $ | 3,332 | $ | (7) | $ | 11,346 | $ | 14,671 | $ | 101 | |
| Issuance of common units – net(a)(b) | 6.9 | 367 | — | — | 367 | — | ||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries with differential membership interests | — | — | — | 165 | 165 | — | ||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary with noncontrolling ownership interests | — | — | — | 72 | 72 | — | ||||||
| Net income | — | 200 | — | 14 | 214 | 4 | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | — | ||||||
| Distributions, primarily to related parties | — | — | — | (432) | (432) | — | ||||||
| Changes in non-economic ownership interests | — | — | — | 11 | 11 | — | ||||||
| Other differential membership investment activity | — | — | — | 315 | 315 | (105) | ||||||
| Sale of Class B noncontrolling interests – net | — | (1) | — | 177 | 176 | — | ||||||
| Payments to Class B noncontrolling interest investors | — | — | — | (146) | (146) | — | ||||||
| Distributions to unitholders(c) | — | (309) | — | — | (309) | — | ||||||
| Buyout of Class B noncontrolling interest investor(c) | — | — | — | (972) | (972) | — | ||||||
| Sale of subsidiary with noncontrolling ownership interest | — | — | — | (80) | (80) | — | ||||||
| Other – net | — | (13) | (1) | 17 | 3 | — | ||||||
| Balances, December 31, 2023 | 93.4 | 3,576 | (7) | 10,488 | 14,057 | — | ||||||
| Issuance of common units – net | 0.1 | 3 | — | — | 3 | — | ||||||
| Related party note receivable | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | — | ||||||
| Net loss | — | (23) | — | (388) | (411) | — | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | — | ||||||
| Related party contributions | — | — | — | 58 | 58 | — | ||||||
| Distributions, primarily to related parties | — | — | — | (481) | (481) | — | ||||||
| Changes in non-economic ownership interests | — | — | — | 216 | 216 | — | ||||||
| Other differential membership investment activity | — | — | — | 98 | 98 | — | ||||||
| Payments to Class B noncontrolling interest investors | — | — | — | (92) | (92) | — | ||||||
| Distributions to unitholders(c) | — | (335) | — | — | (335) | — | ||||||
| Buyout of Class B noncontrolling interest investors | — | — | — | (254) | (254) | — | ||||||
| Other – net | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | — | ||||||
| Balances, December 31, 2024 | 93.5 | 3,221 | (6) | 9,651 | 12,866 | — | ||||||
| Issuance of common units – net | 0.5 | 3 | — | — | 3 | — | ||||||
| Net loss | — | (28) | — | (408) | (436) | — | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | — | ||||||
| Related party note receivable | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | — | ||||||
| Related party contributions | — | — | — | 47 | 47 | — | ||||||
| Distributions, primarily to related parties | — | — | — | (112) | (112) | — | ||||||
| Changes in non-economic ownership interests | — | — | — | (309) | (309) | — | ||||||
| Other differential membership investment activity | — | — | — | 144 | 144 | — | ||||||
| Buyout of differential membership interest investors | — | (5) | — | (70) | (75) | — | ||||||
| Payments to Class B noncontrolling interest investors | — | — | — | (86) | (86) | — | ||||||
| Buyout of Class B noncontrolling interest investors | — | 1 | — | (1,151) | (1,150) | — | ||||||
| Other – net | — | 3 | — | — | 3 | — | ||||||
| Balances, December 31, 2025 | 94.0 | $ | 3,195 | $ | (5) | $ | 7,709 | $ | 10,899 | $ | — |
____________________________
(a) See Note 14 – ATM Program for further discussion. Includes deferred tax impact of approximately $30 million 2023.
(b) In 2023, includes NEE Equity's exchange of XPLR OpCo common units for XPLR common units and includes deferred tax impact of approximately $20 million. See Note 14 – Common Unit Issuances.
(c) Distributions per common unit were $3.5950 and $3.3765 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023
1. Organization and Nature of Business
XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XPLR), was formed as a Delaware limited partnership on March 6, 2014 as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE), a Florida corporation.
On July 1, 2014, XPLR completed its initial public offering (IPO). XPLR used the proceeds from the IPO to purchase common units of XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP (XPLR OpCo), from NextEra Energy Equity Partners, LP (NEE Equity), a Delaware limited partnership and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NEE, and to purchase XPLR OpCo common units from XPLR OpCo.
XPLR OpCo is a limited partnership with a general partner and limited partners. XPLR consolidates the results of XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries because of its controlling interest in the general partner of XPLR OpCo. At December 31, 2025, XPLR owned an approximately 48.8% limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo's common units (limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo) and NEE Equity owned a noncontrolling 51.2% limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo.
XPLR is a limited partnership that, through its ownership in XPLR OpCo, has a partial ownership interest in clean energy infrastructure assets including wind, solar and battery storage projects acquired from NextEra Energy Resources, LLC (NEER) or from third parties. In December 2023, XPLR sold its interests in natural gas pipeline assets located in Texas (Texas pipelines) (see Note 4). In January 2025, XPLR announced a strategic repositioning and XPLR's board and XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners GP, LLC (XPLR OpCo GP), reserved cash for other business purposes and accordingly, XPLR suspended distributions to its common unitholders. In September 2025, indirect subsidiaries of XPLR completed the sale of their ownership interests in Meade Pipeline Co, LLC (Meade), which owned an investment in natural gas pipeline assets in Pennsylvania (Meade pipeline investment).
2. Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies
Basis of Presentation – XPLR’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.), or GAAP. The consolidated financial statements include XPLR’s accounts and operations and those of its subsidiaries in which XPLR has a controlling interest.
All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts included in prior years' consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation, including presentation of discontinued operations as discussed in Note 4. The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition – Revenue is generated primarily from various non-affiliated parties under long-term power purchase agreements (PPA) and in 2023 also from natural gas transportation agreements. Revenue is recognized as energy and any related renewable energy attributes are delivered, which is when revenue is earned based on energy delivered at rates stipulated in the respective PPAs, or natural gas transportation services are performed. See Note 5.
Income Taxes – XPLR recognizes in income its applicable ownership share of U.S. income taxes due to the disregarded tax status of substantially all of the projects under XPLR OpCo. XPLR is allocated its taxable income (loss) pursuant to the limited partnership agreement of XPLR OpCo (XPLR OpCo LP Agreement), for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Additionally, pursuant to the XPLR OpCo LP Agreement, XPLR OpCo GP, with the consent of NEE Equity, may allocate to NEE Equity, as holder of the Class P units, some or all of the current or future year taxable income or gain resulting from certain transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes which would impact XPLR's deferred taxes and would not impact XPLR's total tax expense in the period the allocation is made. In any taxable period that begins at least five years after the taxable period for which any such allocation of taxable income or gain is made to NEE Equity, NEE Equity may approve the allocation of offsetting losses and deductions to NEE Equity with respect to such income or gain allocation as specified in the XPLR OpCo LP Agreement.
Clean energy tax credits generated during the taxable year can be transferred to an unrelated purchaser for cash and are accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification 740 – Income Taxes. Proceeds resulting from the sales of clean energy tax credits for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 of approximately $45 million and $47 million, respectively, are reported in the cash received for income taxes – net within the supplemental disclosures of cash flow information on XPLR's consolidated statements of cash flows. There were no proceeds from the sales of clean energy tax credits for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was signed into law which, among other things, modified tax legislation affecting clean energy tax credits, bonus depreciation rules and tax treatment of research and development expenses and interest deductions. Specifically, the OBBBA provides for 100% bonus depreciation with no phase-out for unregulated property acquired after January 19, 2025, 100% expensing with no phase-out of domestic research and development expenses incurred in taxable years beginning after 2024, and the use of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), rather than earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), with no phase-out for purposes of calculating the interest limitation for taxable years beginning after 2024. The OBBBA did not change the federal corporate tax rate and did not require remeasurement of deferred tax assets or liabilities.
Equity – Equity reflects the financial position of the parties with an ownership interest in the consolidated financial statements. XPLR Infrastructure Partners GP, Inc., has a total equity interest in XPLR of $10,000 at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Limited partners' equity in common units at December 31, 2025 and 2024 reflects the investment of XPLR common unitholders, changes to net income attributable to XPLR, distributions of available cash to common unitholders and other contributions from or distributions to XPLR common unitholders. Accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2025 and 2024 reflects other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to XPLR.
Noncontrolling Interests – Noncontrolling interests represent the portions of net assets in consolidated entities that are not owned by XPLR and are reported as a component of equity on XPLR’s consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2025, noncontrolling interests on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets primarily reflect NEE Equity's approximately 51.2% noncontrolling interest in XPLR OpCo, a non-affiliated party's 50% noncontrolling interest in Star Moon Holdings, LLC (Star Moon Holdings), NEER's 50% noncontrolling ownership interest in Silver State South Solar, LLC (Silver State), NEER's 33% noncontrolling interest in Sunlight Renewables Holdings, LLC (Sunlight Renewables Holdings) and NEER's 51% noncontrolling interest in Emerald Breeze Holdings, LLC (Emerald Breeze) (see Note 3), the interests related to differential membership interests discussed below and the Class B noncontrolling membership interests discussed below.
Certain indirect subsidiaries of XPLR have sold noncontrolling Class B membership interests in entities that have ownership interests in 33 wind projects and eight solar projects, including related battery storage facilities, and one stand-alone battery storage facility (differential membership interests) to third-party investors. Although the third-party investors own equity interests in the wind, solar and battery storage projects, XPLR retains a controlling interest in the entities as of December 31, 2025 and therefore presents the differential membership interests as noncontrolling interests. XPLR, through O&M and administrative services agreements (ASAs) with subsidiaries of NEER, operates and manages the wind, solar and battery storage projects, and consolidates the entities that directly and indirectly own the wind, solar and battery storage projects. The third-party investors are allocated earnings, tax attributes and cash flows in accordance with the respective limited liability company agreements. Those economics are allocated primarily to the third-party investors until they receive a targeted return (the flip date) and thereafter to XPLR. XPLR has the right to call the third-party interests at specified amounts if and when the flip date occurs. See Note 11.
Subsidiaries of XPLR have sold Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II, LLC (XPLR Renewables II), XPLR Infrastructure Pipelines, LLC, (XPLR Pipelines), South Texas Midstream, LLC (STX Midstream), Genesis Solar Holdings, LLC (Genesis Holdings), XPLR Renewables III, LLC (XPLR Renewables III), and XPLR Renewables IV, LLC (XPLR Renewables IV), (collectively, Class B noncontrolling membership interests). Between 2023 and 2025, XPLR purchased all of the Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II, XPLR Pipelines and STX Midstream from the third-party investors. See Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests. The XPLR subsidiaries that sold Class B noncontrolling membership interests retain controlling interests in the related entities and therefore XPLR presents the Class B noncontrolling membership interests owned by third-party investors as noncontrolling interests.
For the differential membership interests and Class B noncontrolling membership interests, XPLR has determined the allocation of economics between the controlling party and third-party investor should not follow the respective ownership percentages for each investment but rather the hypothetical liquidation of book value (HLBV) method based on the governing provisions in each respective limited liability company agreement. Under the HLBV method, the amounts of income and loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests reflects changes in the amount the owners would hypothetically receive at each balance sheet date under the respective liquidation provisions, assuming the net assets of these entities were liquidated at the recorded amounts, after taking into account any capital transactions, such as contributions and distributions, between the entities and the owners. At the point in time that the third party, in hypothetical liquidation, would achieve its targeted return, XPLR attributes the additional hypothetical proceeds to the differential membership interests based on the call price.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the noncontrolling interests, other than the differential membership interests and the Class B noncontrolling membership interests, net income (loss) is allocated based on the respective ownership percentages. The impact of the net income (loss) attributable to the Class B noncontrolling membership interests and the differential membership interests are allocated to NEE Equity's noncontrolling ownership interest and the net income attributable to XPLR based on their respective ownership percentage of XPLR OpCo. Distributions related to the noncontrolling interests, other than the differential membership interests and Class B noncontrolling membership interests, are reflected as partner distributions in XPLR's consolidated statements of cash flows.
Details of the activity in noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 are below:
| Class B Noncontrolling Membership Interests | Differential Membership Interests | NEE's Indirect Noncontrolling Ownership Interests(a) | Other Noncontrolling Ownership Interests | Total Noncontrolling<br>Interests | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (millions) | ||||||||||
| Balances, December 31, 2022 | $ | 5,031 | $ | 4,359 | $ | 891 | $ | 1,065 | $ | 11,346 |
| Sale of Class B noncontrolling interests – net | 177 | — | — | — | 177 | |||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries with differential membership interests | — | 165 | — | — | 165 | |||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary with noncontrolling interests | — | — | 72 | — | 72 | |||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 333 | (696) | 303 | 74 | 14 | |||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | |||||
| Distributions, primarily to related parties | — | — | (391) | (41) | (432) | |||||
| Changes in non-economic ownership interests | — | — | — | 11 | 11 | |||||
| Differential membership investment contributions, net of distributions | — | 118 | — | — | 118 | |||||
| Payments to Class B noncontrolling interest investors | (146) | — | — | — | (146) | |||||
| Sale of differential membership interest | — | 92 | — | — | 92 | |||||
| Buyout of Class B noncontrolling interest investor | (972) | — | — | — | (972) | |||||
| Reclassification of redeemable noncontrolling interests | — | 105 | — | — | 105 | |||||
| Sale of subsidiary with noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | (80) | (80) | |||||
| Other – net | (6) | — | 23 | — | 17 | |||||
| Balances, December 31, 2023 | 4,417 | 4,143 | 899 | 1,029 | 10,488 | |||||
| Related party note receivable | — | — | 5 | — | 5 | |||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 308 | (783) | 4 | 83 | (388) | |||||
| Related party contributions | — | — | 58 | — | 58 | |||||
| Distributions, primarily to related parties | — | — | (422) | (59) | (481) | |||||
| Changes in non-economic ownership interests | — | — | — | 216 | 216 | |||||
| Differential membership investment contributions, net of distributions and buyouts | — | 98 | — | — | 98 | |||||
| Payments to Class B noncontrolling interest investors | (92) | — | — | — | (92) | |||||
| Buyout of Class B noncontrolling interest investors | (254) | — | — | — | (254) | |||||
| Other – net | (3) | (1) | 5 | — | 1 | |||||
| Balances, December 31, 2024 | 4,376 | 3,457 | 549 | 1,269 | 9,651 | |||||
| Related party note receivable | — | — | 2 | — | 2 | |||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 246 | (701) | (32) | 79 | (408) | |||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | |||||
| Related party contributions | — | — | 47 | — | 47 | |||||
| Distributions, primarily to related parties | — | — | (61) | (51) | (112) | |||||
| Changes in non-economic ownership interests | — | — | — | (309) | (309) | |||||
| Differential membership investment contributions, net of distributions | — | 144 | — | — | 144 | |||||
| Buyout of differential membership interest investors | — | (65) | (5) | — | (70) | |||||
| Payments to Class B noncontrolling interest investors | (86) | — | — | — | (86) | |||||
| Buyout of Class B noncontrolling interest investors | (1,152) | — | 1 | — | (1,151) | |||||
| Balances, December 31, 2025 | $ | 3,384 | $ | 2,835 | $ | 502 | $ | 988 | $ | 7,709 |
___________________________
(a) Primarily reflects NEE Equity's noncontrolling interest in XPLR OpCo and NEER's noncontrolling interest in each of Silver State, Sunlight Renewables Holdings and Emerald Breeze.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – In connection with an acquisition in December 2022 from NEER, XPLR recorded redeemable noncontrolling interests of approximately $101 million relating to certain contingencies whereby XPLR may have been obligated to reacquire all or a portion of the third-party investor's interests in an under construction project. As the contingencies were resolved during 2023, XPLR reclassified approximately $105 million of redeemable noncontrolling interests to noncontrolling interests.
Property, Plant and Equipment – Property, plant and equipment consists primarily of development, engineering and construction costs for the clean energy assets, equipment, land, substations and transmission lines. Property, plant and equipment, excluding land and perpetual rights-of-way, is recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives ranging from three to 40 years, commencing on the date the assets are placed in service or acquired (see Note 9). Maintenance and repairs of property, plant and equipment are charged to O&M expense as incurred.
Property, plant and equipment – net on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets includes construction work in progress which reflects construction materials, other equipment, third-party engineering costs, capitalized interest and other costs directly associated with the development and construction of the various projects. Upon commencement of plant operations, costs associated with construction work in progress are transferred to the appropriate category in property, plant and equipment – net.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, as amended, provided for an option to elect a cash grant (convertible investment tax credits) for certain renewable energy property. Convertible investment tax credits (CITCs) are recorded as a reduction in property, plant and equipment – net on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets and are amortized as a reduction to depreciation expense over the estimated life of the related property. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, CITCs, net of amortization, were approximately $380 million and $408 million, respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. XPLR primarily holds such investments in money market funds. Certain cash and cash equivalents are held at the project level for, among other things, debt service and other operational needs. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, approximately $334 million and $277 million, respectively, relates to cash and cash equivalents held at the project level.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – Accounts receivable are reported at the invoiced or estimated amount adjusted for any write-offs and any estimated allowance for doubtful accounts on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed periodically based on amounts past due and significance. There was no allowance for doubtful accounts recorded at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Restricted Cash – At December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR had approximately $62 million and $45 million, respectively, of restricted cash included in current other assets on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets. Restricted cash at December 31, 2025 and 2024 is primarily related to an operating cash reserve. Restricted cash reported as current assets are recorded as such based on the anticipated use of these funds.
Concentration of Credit Risk – Financial instruments which potentially subject XPLR to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable and derivative instruments. Accounts receivable are comprised primarily of amounts due from various non-affiliated parties who are counterparties to the PPAs. The majority of XPLR's counterparties are in the energy industry, and this concentration may impact the overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that the counterparties may be similarly affected by changes in economic, industry or other conditions. If any of these customers’ receivable balances should be deemed uncollectible, it could have a material adverse effect on XPLR’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. Substantially all amounts due from such counterparties at December 31, 2025 have been collected.
During 2025, XPLR derived approximately 14% and 15% of its consolidated revenue from its contracts with Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company, respectively.
Inventories – Spare parts inventories are carried at the lower of weighted-average cost and net realizable value.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets – Long-lived assets that are held and used and finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is required to be recognized if the carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted future net cash flows associated with that asset. The impairment loss to be recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the asset's fair value. In most instances, the fair value is determined by discounting estimated future cash flows using an appropriate interest rate. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, no impairment adjustments were necessary.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Purchase Accounting – For projects acquired, XPLR allocates the cost of the acquisition to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on fair values as of the acquisition date. Goodwill acquired in connection with business acquisitions represents the excess of consideration over the fair value of net assets acquired. Certain assumptions and estimates are employed in determining the fair value of assets acquired and evaluating the fair value of liabilities assumed. See Note 3.
Goodwill – See Note 7 – Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements for discussion of goodwill impairment.
Intangible Assets – PPAs – At December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR's consolidated balance sheets reflect intangible assets – PPAs – net related to acquisitions and will be amortized into operating revenues on a straight-line basis over the remaining contract terms of the related PPAs, which approximates the period giving rise to the value. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, accumulated amortization related to the intangible assets – PPAs was approximately $958 million and $789 million, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets – PPAs was approximately $169 million, $169 million and $163 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and is expected to be approximately $165 million in each of the years 2026 through 2029 and $154 million in 2030.
Intangible Liabilities – PPAs – At December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR's consolidated balance sheets reflect intangible liabilities – PPAs – net related to acquisitions and will be amortized into operating revenues on a straight-line basis over the remaining contract terms of the PPAs, which approximates the period giving rise to the value. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, accumulated amortization related to the intangible liabilities – PPAs was approximately $273 million and $186 million, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible liabilities – PPAs was approximately $87 million, $87 million and $82 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and is expected to be approximately $87 million in each of the years 2026 through 2030.
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations – Generally, a long-lived asset to be sold is classified as held for sale in the period in which management, with approval from XPLR's Board of Directors, commits to a plan to sell and sale is expected to be completed within one year. Assets and liabilities held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying value or their estimated fair value less cost to sell. A disposal group that meets held for sale criteria and also represents a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the entity's operations and financial results is reflected as discontinued operations in the statements of income and prior periods are recast to reflect the earnings or losses from such business as income from discontinued operations, net of tax expense. See Note 4.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – Derivative instruments, when required to be marked to market, are recorded on XPLR’s consolidated balance sheets as either an asset or a liability measured at fair value. See Note 6.
Fair Value Measurements – XPLR uses several different valuation techniques to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities relying primarily on the market approach of using prices and other market information for identical or comparable assets and liabilities for those assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis. Certain financial instruments may be valued using multiple inputs including discount rates, counterparty credit ratings and credit enhancements. XPLR’s assessment of the significance of any particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the fair value measurement of its assets and liabilities and the placement of those assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy levels. See Note 6.
Long-term Debt Costs – XPLR recognizes interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the related debt. Certain of XPLR’s debt obligations include escalating interest rates that are incorporated into the effective interest rate for the related debt. Deferred interest includes interest expense recognized in excess of the interest payments accrued for the related debt’s stated interest payments and is recorded in other liabilities on XPLR’s consolidated balance sheets. Debt issuance costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term debt and are amortized over the life of the related debt using the effective interest rate established at debt issuance. XPLR incurred approximately $73 million and $10 million of debt issuance costs for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2023, respectively. XPLR did not incur debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2024. The amortization of debt issuance costs totaled approximately $16 million, $15 million and $17 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and is included in interest expense in XPLR’s consolidated statements of income (loss). See Note 13.
Asset Retirement Obligations – Asset retirement obligations are those for which a legal obligation exists under laws, statutes, and written or oral contracts, including obligations arising under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, and for which the timing or method of settlement may be conditioned on a future event.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
XPLR accounts for asset retirement obligations and conditional asset retirement obligations (collectively, AROs) under accounting guidance that requires a liability for the fair value of an ARO to be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if it can be reasonably estimated, with the offsetting associated asset retirement costs capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The asset retirement cost is subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method over the asset’s estimated useful life. Changes in the ARO resulting from the passage of time are recognized as an increase in the carrying amount of the liability and as accretion expense, which is included in depreciation and amortization expense in XPLR’s consolidated statements of income (loss). Changes resulting from revisions to the timing or amount of the original estimate of cash flows are recognized as an increase or a decrease in the ARO and asset retirement cost, or income when the asset retirement cost is depleted.
XPLR recorded accretion expense of approximately $18 million, $17 million and $15 million in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Additional AROs were established amounting to approximately $19 million in the year ended December 31, 2023 related to the acquisition in that period (see Note 3). Additionally, XPLR recorded additional AROs of approximately $11 million and $18 million in 2025 and 2024, respectively, and a reduction of AROs of $6 million in 2023, for revisions in estimated cash flows due to revised cost estimates.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities – XPLR accounts for the investments in its unconsolidated entities under the equity method. XPLR’s share of earnings (losses) in the unconsolidated entities is included in equity in earnings of equity method investees and equity in earnings of non-economic ownership interests in XPLR's consolidated statements of income (loss). XPLR records losses of the unconsolidated entities only to the extent of its investment unless there is an obligation to provide further financial support for the investee. All equity in earnings of the non-economic ownership interests is allocated to net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests. See Note 10 and Note 11. XPLR evaluates its equity method investments for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value and the investment may be other-than-temporarily impaired (OTTI). An impairment loss is required to be recognized if the impairment is deemed to be other than temporary. Investments that are OTTI are written down to their estimated fair value and cannot subsequently be written back up for increases in estimated fair value. Impairment losses are recorded in equity in earnings of equity method investees in XPLR’s consolidated statements of income (loss). See Note 7 – Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements regarding an impairment on one of XPLR's equity method investments which occurred in 2024.
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) – An entity is considered to be a VIE when its total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or its equity investors, as a group, lack the characteristics of having a controlling financial interest. A reporting company is required to consolidate a VIE as its primary beneficiary when it has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. XPLR evaluates whether an entity is a VIE whenever reconsideration events as defined by the accounting guidance occur. See Note 11.
Leases – XPLR determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. XPLR recognizes a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a lease liability for operating and finance leases by recognizing and measuring leases at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. For sales-type leases, the book value of the leased asset is removed from the balance sheet and a net investment in sales-type lease is recognized based on fixed payments under the contract and the residual value of the asset being leased. XPLR has elected not to apply the recognition requirements to short-term leases and not to separate nonlease components from associated lease components for substantially all classes of underlying assets except for purchase power agreements. ROU assets are included primarily in noncurrent other assets, lease liabilities are included in current and noncurrent other liabilities and net investments in sales-type leases are included in current and noncurrent other assets on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets. Operating lease expense is included in O&M expense, interest and amortization expense associated with finance leases are included in interest expense and depreciation and amortization expense, respectively, and rental income associated with operating leases and interest income associated with sales-type leases are included in operating revenues in XPLR’s consolidated statements of income (loss). See Note 12.
Segment Information – XPLR’s single reportable segment, through its ownership interest in XPLR OpCo, has a partial ownership interest in clean energy infrastructure assets. XPLR’s reportable segment derives revenues primarily from various non-affiliated parties under long-term PPAs. See Note 5 for information regarding XPLR's operating revenues. The accounting policies of XPLR’s reportable segment are the same as those described above.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
XPLR’s chief operating decision maker (CODM) is XPLR's chief executive officer. The CODM makes key operating decisions and evaluates XPLR's reportable segment results, including net income attributable to XPLR for financial planning, analysis of performance and resource allocation. XPLR's significant segment expenses include operations and maintenance, depreciation and amortization, interest expense and income tax benefit which are reflected in XPLR's consolidated statements of income (loss). XPLR's other segment items include goodwill impairment charge, gains on disposal of businesses/assets – net, taxes other than income taxes and other – net, equity in earnings of equity method investees, equity in earnings (losses) of non-economic ownership interests, other – net and income (loss) from discontinued operations, which are reflected in XPLR's consolidated statements of income (loss).
XPLR's additional segment information is as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Capital expenditures and other investments | $ | 958 | $ | 241 | $ | 1,269 |
| Property, plant and equipment – net | $ | 15,366 | $ | 14,555 | $ | 14,837 |
| Total assets | $ | 19,595 | $ | 20,292 | $ | 22,511 |
| Investments in equity method investees | $ | 625 | $ | 631 | $ | 617 |
| Assets held for sale – Investments in equity method investees | $ | — | $ | 1,153 | $ | 1,236 |
Disposal of Wind Project – In January 2023, a subsidiary of XPLR completed the sale of a 62 megawatt (MW) wind project located in Barnes County, North Dakota for approximately $50 million. Approximately $45 million of the cash proceeds from the sale were distributed to the third-party owner of Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II (see Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests).
Sale and Co-investment Agreement – On February 10, 2026, XPLR OpCo signed a sale and co-investment agreement (Agreement) with NextEra Energy Resources Development, LLC, a subsidiary of NEER. Under the Agreement, XPLR has agreed to sell certain of its existing interconnection assets and rights at four operating sites to either (a) a newly formed joint venture, if XPLR exercises its option to co-invest in a to-be-built battery storage project at that site, or (b) a subsidiary of NEER. XPLR will also sell interconnection assets and rights at a fifth location directly to a subsidiary of NEER. Total cash consideration for these sales is approximately $44 million.
Under the Agreement, if XPLR exercises one or more of its four co-investment options, XPLR and NEER will create one or more joint ventures. Each joint venture will develop, construct and operate one or more battery storage projects. XPLR has the option to co-invest from 25% up to 49% in each joint venture. NEER will be the managing member and will provide development and construction services to each joint venture and will receive an associated fee in accordance with the Agreement.
Under the Agreement, XPLR intends to identify up to 500 MW of additional interconnection assets and rights to potentially sell to a subsidiary of NEER, but will not have the option to co-invest in battery storage projects at these locations. XPLR expects to use some or all of the proceeds from any such sales to fund a portion of its co-investments in the joint ventures to the extent XPLR elects to exercise its co-investment option under the Agreement for one or more joint ventures. The Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants by the parties, including certain indemnification terms and mutual remedies.
- Acquisitions
In June 2023, an indirect subsidiary of XPLR acquired from indirect subsidiaries of NEER ownership interests in a portfolio of wind and solar generation facilities with a combined generating capacity totaling approximately 688 MW (2023 acquisition) for cash consideration of approximately $566 million, plus working capital of $32 million and the assumption of the portfolio’s existing debt and related interest rate swaps of approximately $141 million at time of closing. The acquired portfolio also included noncontrolling interests related to differential membership investors of approximately $165 million at time of closing. The acquisition included the following assets:
•Montezuma II Wind, an approximately 78 MW wind generation facility located in California;
•Chaves County Solar, an approximately 70 MW solar generation facility located in New Mexico;
•Live Oak Solar, an approximately 51 MW solar generation facility located in Georgia;
•River Bend Solar, an approximately 75 MW solar generation facility located in Alabama;
•Casa Mesa Wind, an approximately 51 MW wind generation facility located in New Mexico;
•New Mexico Wind, an approximately 204 MW wind generation facility located in New Mexico;
•Langdon I, an approximately 118 MW wind generation facility located in North Dakota; and
•Langdon II, an approximately 41 MW wind generation facility located in North Dakota.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Under the acquisition method, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including noncontrolling interests, based on their estimated fair value. All fair value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on significant estimates and assumptions, including Level 3 (unobservable) inputs, which require judgment. Estimates and assumptions include the projected timing and amount of future cash flows, discount rates reflecting risk inherent in future cash flows and future market prices. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recognized as goodwill at the acquisition date. The goodwill arising from the acquisition results largely from the assets being well-situated in strong markets with long-term renewables demand, providing long-term optionality for the assets. All of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes over a 15-year period.
The following table summarizes the final amounts recognized by XPLR for the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the 2023 acquisition:
| (millions) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total consideration transferred | $ | 598 |
| Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | ||
| Cash | $ | 15 |
| Accounts receivable, inventory and prepaid expenses | 17 | |
| Current derivative assets | 4 | |
| Property, plant and equipment – net | 764 | |
| Intangible assets – PPAs | 141 | |
| Goodwill | 21 | |
| Noncurrent derivative assets | 8 | |
| Noncurrent other assets | 5 | |
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and current other liabilities | (5) | |
| Long-term debt | (153) | |
| Asset retirement obligation | (12) | |
| Intangible liabilities – PPAs | (37) | |
| Noncurrent other liabilities | (5) | |
| Noncontrolling interest | (165) | |
| Total net identifiable assets, at fair value | $ | 598 |
XPLR incurred approximately $3 million in acquisition-related costs during the year ended December 31, 2023 which are reflected as operations and maintenance in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
The amounts of revenues, operating income, net loss and net income attributable to XPLR included in XPLR's consolidated statement of income related to the 2023 acquisition for the period after closing through December 31, 2023 are as follows:
| (millions) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenues | $ | 39 |
| Operating income | $ | 10 |
| Net loss | $ | (7) |
| Net income attributable to XPLR | $ | 4 |
Supplemental Unaudited Pro forma Results of Operations
XPLR’s pro forma results of operations in the combined entity had the 2023 acquisition been completed on January 1, 2022 are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| (millions) | ||
| Unaudited pro forma results of operations: | ||
| Pro forma revenues | $ | 1,120 |
| Pro forma operating loss | $ | (9) |
| Pro forma net income | $ | 223 |
| Pro forma net income attributable to XPLR | $ | 211 |
The unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations include adjustments to:
•reflect the historical results of the business acquired had the 2023 acquisition been completed on January 1, 2022 assuming consistent operating performance over all periods;
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
•reflect the estimated depreciation and amortization expense based on the estimated fair value of property, plant and equipment – net, intangible assets – PPAs and intangible liabilities – PPAs;
•reflect assumed interest expense related to funding the acquisition; and
•reflect related income tax effects.
The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the transaction been completed on January 1, 2022 or the future results of the consolidated operations.
- Discontinued Operations
In September 2025, indirect subsidiaries of XPLR completed the sale of their ownership interests in Meade, which owned the Meade pipeline investment. XPLR received total cash consideration of approximately $1.1 billion. XPLR used a portion of the proceeds from the sale to pay off related project-level indebtedness of approximately $823 million and to purchase the remaining outstanding Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Pipelines of $219 million. XPLR also received proceeds of approximately $64 million relating to the settlement of interest rate contracts upon paying off the related project-level indebtedness. XPLR recognized a gain on disposal of the Meade pipeline investment of approximately $1 million (less than $1 million after tax), which is reflected in income from discontinued operations in its consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2025. XPLR incurred approximately $7 million in disposal-related costs for the year ended December 31, 2025 which are reflected as operations and maintenance in the consolidated statement of income.
In December 2023, a subsidiary of XPLR completed the sale of its ownership interests in the Texas pipelines. XPLR received total cash consideration of approximately $1.8 billion. XPLR used a portion of the proceeds from the sale to pay off the South Texas Midstream Holdings, LLC outstanding debt of approximately $437 million. XPLR recognized a gain on disposal of the Texas pipelines of approximately $375 million ($329 million after tax), which is reflected in income from discontinued operations in its consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2023. XPLR incurred approximately $15 million in disposal-related costs during the year ended December 31, 2023 which are reflected as operations and maintenance in the consolidated statement of income.
XPLR's results of operations for the Meade pipeline investment and, in 2023, the Texas pipelines are presented as income (loss) from discontinued operations on its consolidated statements of income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.
The table below presents the financial results of the Meade pipeline investment, interest on related project-level indebtedness and, for 2023, the financial results of the Texas pipelines included in income (loss) from discontinued operations:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| OPERATING REVENUES(a) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 224 |
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||
| Operations and maintenance(b) | — | — | 30 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | — | — | 32 | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes and other – net | — | — | 8 | |||
| Total operating expenses – net | — | — | 70 | |||
| GAIN ON DISPOSAL OF A BUSINESS | — | — | 375 | |||
| OPERATING INCOME | — | — | 529 | |||
| OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS) | ||||||
| Interest expense | (56) | (25) | (71) | |||
| Equity in earnings of equity method investees | 11 | 22 | 73 | |||
| Total other income (deductions) – net | (45) | (3) | 2 | |||
| LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | (45) | (3) | 531 | |||
| INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) | (8) | (4) | 59 | |||
| INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS(c) | $ | (37) | $ | 1 | $ | 472 |
____________________
(a) Represents service revenues earned under gas transportation agreements. Includes related party revenues of approximately $32 million and revenues attributable to foreign countries related to XPLR's contract with a Mexican counterparty of approximately $144 million.
(b) Includes related party amounts of approximately $12 million.
(c) At December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, includes net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests of approximately $(16) million, $12 million and $304 million, respectively, which in 2023 includes a noncontrolling interest related to a non-affiliated party's 10% interest in one of the Texas pipelines. Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to noncontrolling interests is less than $1 million for all periods presented.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The noncurrent assets held for sale as of December 31, 2024 reflect XPLR's investment in equity method investees relating to the Meade pipeline investment of approximately $1,153 million.
XPLR has elected not to separately disclose discontinued operations on its consolidated statements of cash flows. Long-lived assets are not depreciated or amortized once they are classified as held for sale. The table below presents cash flows from discontinued operations for major captions on the consolidated statements of cash flows related to the Texas pipelines and the Meade pipeline investment:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 32 |
| Change in value of derivative contracts | $ | 30 | $ | (5) | $ | 32 |
| Deferred income taxes | $ | (8) | $ | (4) | $ | 59 |
| Gain on disposal of a business | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 375 |
| Capital expenditures and other investments | $ | — | $ | (1) | $ | (140) |
| Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of distributions received | $ | 69 | $ | 85 | $ | 35 |
5. Revenue
Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. XPLR's operating revenues are generated primarily from various non-affiliated parties under PPAs and, in 2023, natural gas transportation agreements (see Note 4 regarding sale of the Texas pipelines). XPLR's operating revenues from contracts with customers are partly offset by the net amortization of intangible assets – PPAs and intangible liabilities – PPAs. Revenue is recognized as energy and any related renewable energy attributes are delivered, based on rates stipulated in the respective PPAs, or natural gas transportation services were performed. XPLR believes that the obligation to deliver energy and provide the natural gas transportation services is satisfied over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes benefits provided by XPLR. In addition, XPLR believes that the obligation to deliver renewable energy attributes is satisfied at multiple points in time, with the control of the renewable energy attribute being transferred at the same time the related energy is delivered. XPLR’s operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 are revenue from contracts with customers for energy sales of approximately $1,139 million, $1,155 million and $1,059 million, respectively. XPLR’s operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 include revenue from contracts with customers for natural gas transportation services, substantially all of which is included in income from discontinued operations, of $222 million. XPLR's accounts receivable are associated with revenues earned from contracts with customers. Receivables represent unconditional rights to consideration and reflect the differences in timing of revenue recognition and cash collections. For substantially all of XPLR's receivables customer and counterparty credit risk is managed in the same manner and the terms and conditions of payment are similar.
XPLR recognizes revenues as energy and any related renewable energy attributes are delivered or, in 2023 as natural gas transportation services were performed, consistent with the amounts billed to customers based on rates stipulated in the respective agreements. XPLR considers the amount billed to represent the value of energy delivered or services provided to the customer. XPLR’s customers typically receive bills monthly with payment due within 30 days.
Revenues yet to be earned under contracts with customers to deliver energy and any related energy attributes, which have maturity dates ranging from February 2026 to 2051, will vary based on the volume of energy delivered. At December 31, 2025, XPLR expects to record approximately $159 million of revenues related to the fixed price components of one PPA through 2039 as the energy is delivered.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity
XPLR uses derivative instruments (primarily interest rate swaps) to manage the interest rate cash flow risk associated with outstanding and expected future debt issuances and borrowings and to manage the physical and financial risks inherent in the sale of electricity. XPLR records all derivative instruments that are required to be marked to market as either assets or liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets and measures them at fair value each reporting period. XPLR does not utilize hedge accounting for its derivative instruments. All changes in the interest rate contract derivatives' fair value are recognized in interest expense and the equity method investees' related activity is recognized in equity in earnings of equity method investees in XPLR's consolidated statements of income (loss). At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the net notional amounts of the interest rate contracts were approximately $2.2 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively. All changes in commodity contract derivatives' fair value are recognized in operating revenues in XPLR's consolidated statements of income (loss). At December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR had derivative commodity contracts for power with net notional volumes of approximately 3.1 million MW hours and 2.7 million MW hours, respectively. Cash flows from the interest rate and commodity contracts are reported in cash flows from operating activities in XPLR's consolidated statements of cash flows.
Fair Value Measurement of Derivative Instruments – The fair value of assets and liabilities are determined using either unadjusted quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) or other observable inputs (Level 2) whenever that information is available and using unobservable inputs (Level 3) to estimate fair value only when relevant observable inputs are not available. XPLR uses different valuation techniques to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities, relying primarily on the market approach of using prices and other market information for identical and/or similar assets and liabilities for those assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Certain financial instruments may be valued using multiple inputs including discount rates, counterparty credit ratings and credit enhancements. XPLR’s assessment of the significance of any particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement of those assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy levels. Non-performance risk, including the consideration of a credit valuation adjustment, is also considered in the determination of fair value for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value. Transfers between fair value hierarchy levels occur at the beginning of the period in which the transfer occurred.
XPLR estimates the fair value of its derivative instruments using an income approach based on a discounted cash flows valuation technique utilizing the net amount of estimated future cash inflows and outflows related to the agreements. The primary inputs used in the fair value measurements include the contractual terms of the derivative agreements, current interest rates and credit profiles. The significant inputs for the resulting fair value measurement of interest rate contracts are market-observable inputs and the measurements are reported as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
The tables below present XPLR's gross derivative positions, based on the total fair value of each derivative instrument, at December 31, 2025 and 2024 as well as the location of the net derivative positions, based on the expected timing of future payments, on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets.
| December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting(a) | Total | ||||||
| (millions) | ||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||
| Interest rate contracts | $ | — | $ | 62 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 62 |
| Commodity contracts | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3 | $ | — | 3 | |
| Total derivative assets | $ | 65 | ||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||
| Interest rate contracts | $ | — | $ | 10 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10 |
| Commodity contracts | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10 | $ | — | 10 | |
| Total derivative liabilities | $ | 20 | ||||||||
| Net fair value by balance sheet line item: | ||||||||||
| Current other assets | $ | 22 | ||||||||
| Noncurrent other assets | 43 | |||||||||
| Total derivative assets | $ | 65 | ||||||||
| Current other liabilities | $ | 17 | ||||||||
| Noncurrent other liabilities | 3 | |||||||||
| Total derivative liabilities | $ | 20 |
____________________
(a) Includes the effect of the contractual ability to settle contracts under master netting arrangements.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting(a) | Total | ||||||
| (millions) | ||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||
| Interest rate contracts | $ | — | $ | 242 | $ | — | $ | (2) | $ | 240 |
| Commodity contracts | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4 | $ | (2) | 2 | |
| Total derivative assets | $ | 242 | ||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||
| Interest rate contracts | $ | — | $ | 2 | $ | — | $ | (2) | $ | — |
| Commodity contracts | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7 | $ | (2) | 5 | |
| Total derivative liabilities | $ | 5 | ||||||||
| Net fair value by balance sheet line item: | ||||||||||
| Current other assets | $ | 55 | ||||||||
| Noncurrent other assets | 187 | |||||||||
| Total derivative assets | $ | 242 | ||||||||
| Current other liabilities | $ | 5 | ||||||||
| Noncurrent other liabilities | — | |||||||||
| Total derivative liabilities | $ | 5 |
____________________
(a) Includes the effect of the contractual ability to settle contracts under master netting arrangements.
Financial Statement Impact of Derivative Instruments – Gains (losses) related to XPLR's derivatives are recorded in XPLR's consolidated financial statements as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts – interest expense | $ | (92) | $ | 109 | $ | (134) |
| Interest rate contracts – income from discontinued operations | $ | (14) | $ | 37 | $ | 14 |
| Commodity contracts – operating revenues | $ | — | $ | 18 | $ | (20) |
Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features – Certain of XPLR's derivative instruments contain credit-related cross-default and material adverse change triggers, none of which contain requirements to maintain certain credit ratings or financial ratios. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the aggregate fair value of XPLR's derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position was approximately $10 million and $2 million, respectively.
7. Non-Derivative Fair Value Measurements
Non-derivative fair value measurements consist of XPLR's cash equivalents. The fair value of these financial assets is determined using the valuation techniques and inputs as described in Note 6 – Fair Value Measurement of Derivative Instruments. The fair value of money market funds that are included in cash and cash equivalents, current other assets and noncurrent other assets on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets is estimated using a market approach based on current observable market prices.
Recurring Non-Derivative Fair Value Measurements – XPLR’s fair value measurements made on a recurring basis by fair value hierarchy level are as follows:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | |||||||
| (millions) | ||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||
| Cash equivalents | $ | 623 | $ | — | $ | 623 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
| Total assets | $ | 623 | $ | — | $ | 623 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial Instruments Recorded at Other than Fair Value – The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments recorded at other than fair value are as follows:
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying<br>Value | Fair<br>Value | Carrying<br>Value | Fair<br>Value | |||||
| (millions) | ||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities(a) | $ | 6,202 | $ | 6,312 | $ | 5,314 | $ | 5,216 |
____________________
(a) At December 31, 2025 and 2024, approximately $6,298 million and $5,201 million, respectively, of the fair value is estimated using a market approach based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues (Level 2); the balance is estimated using an income approach utilizing a discounted cash flow valuation technique, considering the current credit profile of the debtor (Level 3). At December 31, 2025, approximately $494 million of the fair value relates to the 2022 convertible notes and is Level 2. At December 31, 2024, approximately $1,028 million of the fair value relates to the 2020 convertible notes and the 2022 convertible notes and is Level 2.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements – XPLR tested goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicated that the fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying value. During the preparation of XPLR's December 31, 2024 financial statements, XPLR concluded that a triggering event occurred and it was more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting unit was less than its carrying value as a result of the significant decline in trading price of XPLR's common units during the fourth quarter of 2024. Therefore, XPLR performed a quantitative analysis using a combination of (i) an income approach consisting of a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate fair value for noncontrolling interests, including Class B noncontrolling membership interests and differential membership interests, (ii) a market approach derived from the observable trading price of its common units at December 31, 2024 of $17.80 to estimate fair value for (a) its common units and (b) noncontrolling interests related to NEE Equity's interest in XPLR OpCo, and (iii) an estimated control premium for the reporting unit and determined that the fair value of its reporting unit was less than its carrying value. As a result, XPLR recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2024 of approximately $575 million ($503 million after tax) which is reflected in its consolidated statement of income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Subsequently, during the preparation of XPLR's March 31, 2025 financial statements, XPLR concluded that a triggering event occurred and it was more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting unit was less than its carrying value as a result of the significant decline in trading price of XPLR's common units during the first quarter of 2025. Therefore, XPLR performed a quantitative analysis consistent with the procedures discussed above and utilizing the observable trading price of XPLR's common units at March 31, 2025 of $9.50 and determined that the fair value of its reporting unit was less than its carrying value. As a result, XPLR recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge in the first quarter of 2025 of approximately $253 million ($222 million after tax), or the full remaining carrying value of goodwill, which is reflected in its consolidated statement of income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2025.
XPLR tests its equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the investment may be impaired. During the preparation of XPLR's December 31, 2024 financial statements, it was determined that XPLR's investment in Meade, which was accounted for under the equity method of accounting, was other-than-temporarily impaired. The impairment was the result of market information obtained by XPLR and XPLR's estimate of fair value as it evaluated options relating to a potential sale of its ownership interests in Meade in 2025 (see Note 4). As such, XPLR concluded its equity method investment in Meade was impaired and the impairment was other than temporary. Accordingly, XPLR performed a fair value analysis using a combination of a market approach and an income approach to determine the magnitude of the OTTI. Based on this fair value analysis, the equity method investment with a carrying amount of approximately $1.2 billion was written down to its estimated fair value of approximately $1.15 billion as of December 31, 2024, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $49 million ($43 million after tax), which is reflected in income (loss) from discontinued operations in its consolidated statement of income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The fair value estimate was based on a market approach using a market participant view of potential different outcomes regarding sales price of the investment, including commitments from ongoing litigation, and an income approach using forecasted distributions prior to the expected disposition date. As part of the valuation, XPLR used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), including different expected sales prices and the forecasted cash flows from the equity method investment. An increase in the forecasted cash flows from the equity method investment or an increase in the estimated sales price would result in a higher fair value. Changes in the opposite direction of those unobservable inputs would result in a lower fair value.
8. Income Taxes
Effective January 1, 2025, XPLR adopted an accounting standards update that provides guidance for reporting on income taxes and requires additional disclosures related to cash paid (received) for income taxes – net and the effective income tax rate. XPLR adopted the updated standard for income taxes using the full retrospective approach, which changed the presentation of certain information below.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of income (loss) before income taxes are as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Continuing operations | $ | (477) | $ | (454) | $ | (279) |
| Discontinued operations(a) | (45) | (3) | 531 | |||
| Total income (loss) before income taxes | $ | (522) | $ | (457) | $ | 252 |
____________________
(a) See Note 4.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Federal: | ||||||
| Deferred | $ | (72) | $ | (42) | $ | (27) |
| Total federal | (72) | (42) | (27) | |||
| State: | ||||||
| Deferred | (6) | — | 2 | |||
| Total state | (6) | — | 2 | |||
| Income tax benefit from continuing operations | (78) | (42) | (25) | |||
| Income tax expense (benefit) from discontinued operations | (8) | (4) | 59 | |||
| Total income tax expense (benefit) | $ | (86) | $ | (46) | $ | 34 |
A reconciliation of the income tax expense (benefit) and effective tax rate based on the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate is as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| (millions, except for percentages) | ||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate of 21% | $ | (100) | 21.0 | % | $ | (95) | 21.0 | % | $ | (59) | 21.0 | % |
| Increases (reductions) resulting from: | ||||||||||||
| Taxes attributable to noncontrolling interests | 82 | (16.9) | 85 | (18.4) | 59 | (21.0) | ||||||
| State income taxes – net of federal income tax benefit(a) | (6) | 1.2 | — | — | 2 | (0.8) | ||||||
| Clean energy tax credits | (56) | 11.5 | (32) | 6.9 | (28) | 10.1 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance | 2 | (0.4) | 1 | (0.3) | 1 | (0.3) | ||||||
| Other adjustments – net | — | — | (1) | 0.1 | — | — | ||||||
| Income tax benefit and effective tax rate from continuing operations | $ | (78) | 16.4 | % | $ | (42) | 9.3 | % | $ | (25) | 9.0 | % |
____________________
(a) In 2025, state taxes in California and Texas made up greater than 50 percent of the tax effect in this category. In 2024, state taxes in California, Kansas, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania made up greater than 50 percent of the tax effect in this category. In 2023, state taxes in Texas, California, Oklahoma and Colorado made up greater than 50 percent of the tax effect in this category.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. These items are stated at the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. XPLR believes that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets at December 31, 2025 shown in the table below, net of the valuation allowances, will be realized due to sufficient future income.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The income tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to XPLR's deferred income tax liabilities and assets are as follows:
| December 31, | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
| (millions) | ||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||
| Investment in partnership(a)(b) | $ | (310) | $ | (253) |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | (310) | (253) | ||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||
| Net operating loss carryforwards(b) | 519 | 428 | ||
| Tax credit carryforwards | 33 | 23 | ||
| Capital loss carryforward | 4 | — | ||
| Valuation allowance | (5) | (2) | ||
| Total deferred tax assets | 551 | 449 | ||
| Net deferred income taxes | $ | 241 | $ | 196 |
____________________
(a) At December 31, 2025 and 2024, includes a deferred tax asset of approximately $46 million and $19 million, respectively, of interest limitation carryforward with an indefinite expiration period.
(b) At December 31, 2024, excludes approximately $39 million of tax impacts relating to 2023 tax year taxable gains of $154 million which were allocated to NEE Equity in March 2024. See Note 15 – Tax Allocations.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities included on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
| December 31, | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
| (millions) | ||||
| Noncurrent other assets | $ | 263 | $ | 219 |
| Noncurrent other liabilities | (22) | (23) | ||
| Net deferred income taxes | $ | 241 | $ | 196 |
The components of deferred tax assets, before valuation allowance, relating to net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards at December 31, 2025 are as follows:
| Amount | Expiration Dates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (millions) | ||||
| Net operating loss carryforwards: | ||||
| Federal | $ | 439 | 2034 – 2037 | |
| State | 80 | 2028 – 2055 | ||
| Total net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 519 | (a) | |
| Tax credit carryforwards | $ | 33 | 2026 – 2045 |
____________________
(a) Includes approximately $294 million and $10 million of federal and state, respectively, net operating loss carryforwards with an indefinite expiration period.
Cash received for income taxes – net are approximately $45 million, $47 million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, all of which relate to federal income taxes, except for $1 million in 2023 which relates to state income taxes in California.
During 2025 and 2024, XPLR recorded state tax liabilities of less than $1 million (net of federal tax benefit) in both periods related to unrecognized tax benefits of prior year state tax filing positions. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is approximately $5 million (net of federal tax benefit). The open tax years in all jurisdictions are 2014 through 2024.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
| December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | Range of Useful<br>Lives (in years) | |||||
| (millions) | |||||||
| Power-generation assets(a) | $ | 17,587 | $ | 16,269 | 3 | – | 40 |
| Land improvements and buildings | 672 | 672 | 3 | – | 40 | ||
| Land, including perpetual rights-of-way | 79 | 79 | |||||
| Construction work in progress | 85 | 47 | |||||
| Other depreciable assets | 455 | 472 | 3 | – | 40 | ||
| Property, plant and equipment, gross | 18,878 | 17,539 | |||||
| Accumulated depreciation | (3,512) | (2,984) | |||||
| Property, plant and equipment – net | $ | 15,366 | $ | 14,555 |
________________________
(a) Approximately 91% of power-generation assets represent machinery and equipment used to generate electricity with a depreciable life of 35-years or greater.
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 was approximately $544 million, $531 million and $504 million, respectively. A number of XPLR's generation facilities are encumbered by liens securing various financings. The net book value of XPLR's assets serving as collateral was approximately $4.6 billion at December 31, 2025.
- Equity Method Investments
At December 31, 2025, investments in equity method investees primarily included the approximately 50% ownership interest in Desert Sunlight Investment Holdings, LLC, 50% ownership interest in Rosmar Holdings, LLC (Rosmar), the 40% ownership interest in Pine Brooke Class A Holdings, LLC (Pine Brooke Holdings), the 33.3% ownership interest in Shaw Creek Solar Holdings, LLC, the 33.3% ownership interest in Nutmeg Solar Holdings, LLC and the 33.3% ownership interest in Solar Holdings Portfolio 12, LLC. XPLR was not the primary beneficiary and therefore did not consolidate these entities because it did not control any of the ongoing activities of these entities, was not involved in the initial design of these entities and did not have controlling interests in these entities. In 2025, XPLR completed the sale of its ownership interests in Meade (see Note 4), which was an equity method investment, resulting in prior-year information being recast to exclude Meade.
Summarized information for these equity method investees is as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Revenues | $ | 329 | $ | 332 | $ | 333 |
| Operating income | $ | 135 | $ | 124 | $ | 128 |
| Net income | $ | 181 | $ | 178 | $ | 157 |
| December 31, | ||||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||
| (millions) | ||||||
| Current assets | $ | 138 | $ | 166 | ||
| Noncurrent assets | $ | 2,775 | $ | 3,355 | ||
| Current liabilities | $ | 86 | $ | 89 | ||
| Noncurrent liabilities | $ | 852 | $ | 1,211 | ||
| XPLR's share of underlying equity in the equity method investees | $ | 716 | $ | 768 | ||
| Difference between investment carrying amounts and underlying equity in net assets(a) | (91) | (137) | ||||
| XPLR's investment carrying amounts | $ | 625 | $ | 631 |
________________________
(a) Substantially all of the difference between the investment carrying amount and the underlying equity in net assets is being amortized over the life of the related projects.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
- Variable Interest Entities
XPLR has identified XPLR OpCo, a limited partnership with a general partner and limited partners, as a VIE. XPLR has consolidated the results of XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries because of its controlling interest in the general partner of XPLR OpCo. At December 31, 2025, XPLR owned an approximately 48.8% limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo and NEE Equity owned a noncontrolling 51.2% limited partner interest in XPLR OpCo. The assets and liabilities of XPLR OpCo as well as the operations of XPLR OpCo represent substantially all of XPLR's assets and liabilities and its operations.
In addition, at December 31, 2025, XPLR OpCo consolidated 15 VIEs related to certain subsidiaries which have sold differential membership interests (see Note 2 – Noncontrolling Interests) in entities which own and operate 33 wind generation facilities as well as eight solar projects, including related battery storage facilities, and one stand-alone battery storage facility. These entities are considered VIEs because the holders of the differential membership interests do not have substantive rights over the significant activities of these entities. The assets, primarily property, plant and equipment – net, and liabilities, primarily accounts payable and accrued expenses and asset retirement obligations, of the VIEs, totaled approximately $9,601 million and $504 million, respectively, at December 31, 2025. At December 31, 2024, there were 19 VIEs and the assets and liabilities of those VIEs at such date totaled approximately $10,940 million and $588 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2025, XPLR OpCo also consolidated three VIEs related to the sales of Class B noncontrolling membership interests in certain XPLR subsidiaries (the Class B VIEs). See Note 2 – Noncontrolling Interests and Note 14 – Class B Noncontrolling Interests. These entities are considered VIEs because the holders of the Class B noncontrolling membership interests do not have substantive rights over the significant activities of the entities. The assets, primarily property, plant and equipment – net and intangible assets – PPAs – net, and the liabilities, primarily accounts payable and accrued expenses, long-term debt, intangible liabilities – PPAs – net, noncurrent other liabilities and asset retirement obligations, of the VIEs totaled approximately $10,066 million and $1,464 million, respectively, at December 31, 2025. At December 31, 2024, there were five VIEs, including one with ownership interests in natural gas pipeline assets (see Note 4), and the assets, which included investments in equity method investees, and liabilities of those VIEs at such date totaled approximately $13,133 million and $2,582 million, respectively. Certain of the Class B VIEs include three other VIEs related to XPLR's ownership interests in Pine Brooke Holdings, Star Moon Holdings and Emerald Breeze, and at December 31, 2024 also included two other VIEs related to XPLR's ownership interests in Rosmar and Silver State, which had assets and liabilities of $681 million and $28 million, respectively, at December 31, 2025, and one VIE related to XPLR's ownership interests in Meade (see Note 4). In addition, certain of the Class B VIEs contain entities which have sold differential membership interests and approximately $7,217 million and $7,413 million of assets and $419 million and $429 million of liabilities are also included in the above disclosure of the VIEs related to differential membership interests at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
At December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR OpCo consolidated Sunlight Renewables Holdings, LLC (Sunlight Renewables Holdings), which has interests in a battery storage facility with storage capacity of 230 MW in which XPLR has an indirect 67% controlling ownership interest, which is a VIE. The assets, primarily property, plant and equipment – net, and the liabilities, primarily asset retirement obligation and noncurrent other liabilities, of the VIE totaled approximately $407 million and $9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2025 and $414 million and $9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2024. This VIE contains entities which have sold differential membership interests and approximately $329 million and $333 million of assets and $8 million and $9 million of liabilities at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, are also included in the disclosure of VIEs related to differential membership interests above.
Certain subsidiaries of XPLR OpCo have noncontrolling interests in entities accounted for under the equity method that are considered VIEs. See Note 10.
Through a series of transactions in 2015, a subsidiary of XPLR issued 1,000,000 XPLR OpCo Class B Units, Series 1 and 1,000,000 XPLR OpCo Class B Units, Series 2, to NEER for approximately 50% of the ownership interests in three NEER solar projects (non-economic ownership interests). NEER, as holder of the XPLR OpCo Class B Units, retained 100% of the economic rights in the projects to which the respective Class B Units relate, including the right to all distributions paid by the project subsidiaries that own the projects to XPLR OpCo. At December 31, 2024, XPLR had an indirect equity method investment related to the non-economic ownership interests of approximately $324 million which is reflected as noncurrent other assets on XPLR's consolidated balance sheet. All equity in earnings of the non-economic ownership interests was allocated to net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests. XPLR was not the primary beneficiary and therefore did not consolidate these entities because it did not control any of the ongoing activities of these entities, was not involved in the initial design of these entities and did not have a controlling interest in these entities. In June 2025, an indirect subsidiary of XPLR merged the entities holding its indirect equity method investment related to its non-economic ownership interests into two subsidiaries of NEER. The merger resulted in NEER no longer owning any of the XPLR OpCo Class B Units, Series 1 and Series 2 and XPLR no longer holding non-economic interests in the projects. In connection with the transaction, XPLR exchanged cash consideration with NEER and removed the approximately $309 million equity method investment and the corresponding noncontrolling interest from its condensed consolidated balance sheet. The transaction did not result in any gain or loss to XPLR.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
12. Leases
XPLR has operating and finance leases primarily related to land use agreements for certain of its energy projects. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR had recorded right-of-use (ROU) assets for operating leases of approximately $7 million and $27 million, respectively, and operating lease liabilities of $10 million and $29 million, respectively. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR's ROU assets for finance leases totaled approximately $34 million and $45 million, respectively, and finance lease liabilities totaled $40 million and $49 million, respectively. XPLR’s operating lease liabilities were calculated based on a weighted-average discount rate of 5.19% and 4.26% based on the incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date and have a weighted-average remaining lease term of 25 years and 25 years, at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. XPLR's finance lease liabilities were calculated based on a weighted average discount rate of 5.72% and 3.55% with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 35 years and 32 years, at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Lease payments under the land use agreements, which convey exclusive use of the land during the arrangement, are either fixed based on the terms of the related lease agreement or variable primarily based on the amount of generation at the energy project. As of December 31, 2025, XPLR’s operating and finance leases with fixed payments have expiration dates ranging from 2028 to 2063. As of December 31, 2025, XPLR's expected lease payments over the remaining terms of the leases were approximately $115 million with no one year being material.
XPLR has operating leases and a sales-type lease relating to battery storage facilities that sell their electric output under power sales agreements to third parties which provide the customers the ability to dispatch the facilities. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the net investment in the sales-type lease is approximately $14 million and $15 million, respectively. At December 31, 2025, the power sales agreements have expiration dates from 2037 to 2041 and XPLR expects to receive approximately $579 million of lease payments over the remaining term of the power sales agreement with no one year being material. XPLR recognized approximately $48 million, $45 million and $47 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, of operating and sales-type lease-related revenues relating to battery storage facilities which are included in revenues in XPLR's consolidated statements of income (loss).
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. Debt
XPLR’s long-term debt agreements require monthly, quarterly or semi-annual payments of interest. Principal payments on the senior secured limited-recourse debt are primarily due monthly or semi-annually. The carrying value of XPLR’s long-term debt consists of the following:
| December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Maturity<br>Date | Balance | Weighted-Average<br>Interest Rate | Balance | Weighted-Average<br>Interest Rate | |||||
| (millions) | (millions) | ||||||||
| XPLR: | |||||||||
| Senior unsecured convertible notes – fixed(a) | 2026 | $ | 500 | 2.50 | % | $ | 1,100 | 1.14 | % |
| XPLR OpCo: | |||||||||
| Senior unsecured notes – fixed(b) | 2026 – 2034 | 3,833 | 7.50 | % | 1,800 | 5.47 | % | ||
| Revolving credit facility – variable(a)(c) | 2029(d) | — | — | % | 330 | 6.28 | % | ||
| Project level: | |||||||||
| Senior secured limited-recourse debt – fixed | 2033 | 14 | 4.52 | % | 16 | 4.52 | % | ||
| Senior secured limited-recourse debt – variable(c)(e)(f) | 2026 – 2032 | 1,750 | 6.01 | % | 1,900 | 6.16 | % | ||
| Other long-term debt – variable(c)(e) | 2028 | 102 | 5.98 | % | 118 | 6.60 | % | ||
| Other long-term debt – fixed(g) | 2026 – 2031 | 90 | 0.04 | % | 86 | 0.05 | % | ||
| Unamortized debt issuance costs and discount | (87) | (36) | |||||||
| Total long-term debt | 6,202 | 5,314 | |||||||
| Less current portion of long-term debt | 762 | 705 | |||||||
| Long-term debt, excluding current portion | $ | 5,440 | $ | 4,609 |
________________________
(a) See additional discussion of the convertible notes and the XPLR OpCo credit facility below.
(b) The XPLR OpCo senior unsecured notes are absolutely and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by XPLR and a direct subsidiary of XPLR OpCo.
(c) Variable rate is based on an underlying index plus a margin.
(d) Substantially all has a maturity date in 2029. See additional discussion of the revolving credit facility below.
(e) Interest rate contracts, primarily swaps, have been entered into for these debt borrowings. See Note 6.
(f) See additional discussion of term loan facilities below.
(g) Substantially all is related party. See Note 15 – Related Party Long-term Debt.
As of December 31, 2025, minimum annual maturities of long-term debt are approximately $764 million, $629 million, $646 million, $828 million and $823 million for 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030, respectively.
XPLR OpCo and its direct subsidiary (loan parties) are parties to a variable rate, senior secured revolving credit facility (XPLR OpCo credit facility). In February 2026, XPLR OpCo updated the XPLR OpCo credit facility and at February 17, 2026, the XPLR OpCo credit facility has a maturity date of 2031 and provided up to $1.25 billion of revolving credit loans and included borrowing capacity of up to $400 million for letters of credit and capacity for incremental commitments that would increase the XPLR OpCo credit facility to up to $2.0 billion in the aggregate, subject to certain conditions. In order to borrow or to have letters of credit issued under the XPLR OpCo credit facility, the loan parties are required, among other things, to be in compliance with financial covenants of a maximum leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio (as defined in the XPLR OpCo credit facility). Borrowings under the XPLR OpCo credit facility can be used by the loan parties to fund working capital and expansion projects, to make acquisitions and for general business purposes. The XPLR OpCo credit facility is subject to a facility fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.35% per annum depending on XPLR OpCo's leverage ratio.
At December 31, 2025, certain indirect subsidiaries of XPLR are parties to three limited-recourse senior secured variable rate term loan facilities (term loan facilities) which provide in aggregate up to $1,597 million to finance a portion of XPLR's wind repowering program. Approximately $942 million was borrowed in 2025 under the term loan facilities and as of February 17, 2026, up to $655 million was available under the combined facilities, subject to specified conditions. Additional borrowings are expected to occur as wind repowering projects are completed.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The long-term debt agreements disclosed above, including the XPLR OpCo credit facility to the extent any amounts are outstanding, contain default and related acceleration provisions relating to the failure to make required payments or to observe other covenants in the respective financing agreements and related documents. Certain of the long-term debt agreements include financial covenants primarily related to debt service coverage ratios, as well as a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. At December 31, 2025, XPLR and its subsidiaries were in compliance with all financial debt covenants under their respective financing agreements. Under the XPLR OpCo credit facility, XPLR OpCo's ability to pay cash distributions is subject to certain other restrictions. All borrowings under the XPLR OpCo credit facility are guaranteed by XPLR OpCo and XPLR and the XPLR OpCo senior unsecured notes are guaranteed by XPLR and a direct subsidiary of XPLR OpCo.
Certain of the long-term debt agreements disclosed above, including the XPLR OpCo credit facility, contain various covenants and restrictive provisions that limit XPLR OpCo’s and its subsidiaries' ability to, among other things:
•incur or guarantee additional debt;
•make distributions on or redeem or repurchase common units;
•make certain investments and acquisitions;
•incur certain liens or permit them to exist;
•enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates;
•merge or consolidate with another company; and
•transfer, sell or otherwise dispose of projects.
Certain of the long-term debt agreements disclosed above also contain provisions which, under certain conditions, restrict the payment of dividends and other distributions.
During 2025, XPLR repaid $600 million principal amount of senior unsecured convertible notes issued in 2020 (2020 convertible notes) and during 2024, XPLR repaid $500 million principal amount of senior unsecured convertible notes issued in 2021 (2021 convertible notes), at maturity.
During 2022, XPLR issued $500 million principal amount of senior unsecured convertible notes due 2026 (2022 convertible notes). The 2022 convertible notes are unsecured obligations of XPLR and are absolutely and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by XPLR OpCo. A holder may convert all or a portion of its 2022 convertible notes in accordance with the related indenture. Upon conversion of the 2022 convertible notes, XPLR will pay cash up to the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be converted and pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, XPLR common units or a combination of cash and common units, at XPLR's election, in respect of the remainder, if any, of XPLR's conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the notes being converted. At February 17, 2026, the conversion rate, which is subject to certain adjustments, was 10.7846 XPLR common units per $1,000 of the 2022 convertible notes, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $92.7248 per XPLR common unit. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, as set forth in the related indenture. Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the related indenture), holders of the 2022 convertible notes may require XPLR to repurchase all or a portion of their convertible notes for cash in an amount equal to the principal amount of the 2022 convertible notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The 2022 convertible notes are not redeemable at XPLR’s option prior to maturity.
14. Equity
Distributions – In January 2025, as part of the strategic repositioning, XPLR began reserving cash for other business purposes and accordingly XPLR suspended distributions to its common unitholders. During 2024 and 2023, XPLR distributed approximately $335 million and $309 million, respectively, to its common unitholders.
Earnings Per Unit – Diluted earnings per unit is calculated based on the weighted-average number of common units and potential common units outstanding during the period, including the dilutive effect of the convertible notes. During periods with dilution, the dilutive effect of the outstanding convertible notes is calculated using the if-converted method.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The reconciliation of XPLR's basic and diluted earnings per unit is as follows:
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
| (millions, except per unit amounts) | |||||||
| Numerator – net income (loss) attributable to XPLR: | |||||||
| From continuing operations | $ | (7) | $ | (12) | $ | 32 | |
| From discontinued operations | (21) | (11) | 168 | ||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to XPLR | $ | (28) | $ | (23) | $ | 200 | |
| Denominator: | |||||||
| Weighted-average number of common units outstanding – basic | 93.9 | 93.5 | 91.6 | ||||
| Effect of dilutive convertible notes(a) | — | — | — | ||||
| Weighted-average number of common units outstanding – assuming dilution | 93.9 | 93.5 | 91.6 | ||||
| Earnings (loss) per common unit attributable to XPLR – basic and assuming dilution: | |||||||
| From continuing operations | $ | (0.07) | $ | (0.13) | $ | 0.35 | |
| From discontinued operations | (0.23) | (0.12) | 1.83 | ||||
| Earnings (loss) per common unit attributable to XPLR – basic and assuming dilution | $ | (0.30) | $ | (0.25) | $ | 2.18 |
________________________
(a) During all periods the outstanding convertible notes were antidilutive and as such were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per unit. See Note 13 regarding the repayment of the 2020 convertible notes and the 2021 convertible notes.
ATM Program – XPLR has an at-the-market equity issuance program (ATM program), which was most recently renewed in 2023, pursuant to which XPLR may issue, from time to time, up to $500 million of its common units. During the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, XPLR did not issue any common units under its ATM program. During the year ended December 31, 2023, XPLR issued approximately 5.1 million common units under the ATM program for gross proceeds of approximately $316 million. Fees related to the ATM program totaled approximately $3 million in 2023.
Common Unit Issuances – During 2023, XPLR issued approximately 1.7 million XPLR common units, upon NEE Equity's exchange of XPLR OpCo common units on a one-for-one basis.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Class B Noncontrolling Interests – Subsidiaries of XPLR sold Class B noncontrolling membership interests in Genesis Holdings, XPLR Renewables III and XPLR Renewables IV as described below:
| Genesis Holdings | XPLR Renewables III | XPLR Renewables IV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Underlying projects | Renewable energy projects with a combined net generating capacity of approximately 1,124 MW | Renewable energy projects with a combined net generating capacity of approximately 1,260 MW | Clean energy projects with a combined net generating capacity of approximately 2,042 MW |
| Date of sale | December 18, 2020 | December 28, 2021 | December 15, 2022 |
| Gross proceeds | $1,243 million | $816 million | $887 million(a) |
| Initial allocation of distributable cash to Class B investors | 25%(b) | 65% | 17%(a) |
| Period for initial allocation | 10 years(b) | 10 years | 10 years |
| Period for initial allocation if minimum buyouts have not occurred | 5.5 years | 6 years | 6.5 years |
| Allocation of distributable cash to Class B investors after initial allocation period | 99%(b) | 99% | 99% |
| Date buyout period begins | December 18, 2025 | December 28, 2026 | December 15, 2027 |
| Buyout right timing(c)(d) | Periodically, and for partial interests between years 5 and 10(b) | Periodically, and for partial interests between years 5 and 10 | Periodically, and for partial interests between years 5 and 10 |
| Percentage of buyout price that can be paid in XPLR non-voting common units at current market price(e) | 100% | 100% | 100% |
____________________
(a)At December 31, 2022, XPLR retained certain Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables IV which were sold to the Class B investors for approximately $177 million at a final funding in November 2023. Prior to the final Class B funding, XPLR received approximately 86% of XPLR Renewables IV's cash distributions and the third-party investors received 14%.
(b)The allocation of distributable cash to Class B investors increases to 99% if XPLR has not exercised certain buyout rights by June 18, 2026. In January 2025, the limited liability company agreement was amended to provide XPLR with the option, subject to specified conditions, to extend the date until which it has the right to buy out all of the then remaining outstanding Class B noncontrolling membership interests from December 17, 2030 to December 17, 2034, subject to specified conditions. If XPLR exercises the option for extended buyout rights and XPLR does not buy out a specified minimum amount of Class B noncontrolling membership interests prior to December 18 of each of 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033 and 2034 (each, a buyout deadline), the allocation of Genesis Holdings’ cash flows between the holders of the Class B noncontrolling membership interests and XPLR will flip to be allocated from 25% to 99% to the holders of the Class B noncontrolling membership interests and 75% to 1% to XPLR, until the date of any subsequent buyout deadline; provided, however, until the date on which all previous minimum buyouts have been completed, 85% of the amounts distributable for Class B noncontrolling membership interests held by XPLR would instead be distributed to the other holders of Class B noncontrolling membership interests.
(c)The buyout right is subject to certain limitations and/or extensions in the respective agreements, including, but not limited to, XPLR being able to purchase a maximum of the Class B units following anniversaries specified in certain of the agreements.
(d)Each limited liability company agreement provides the Class B investor the right to require XPLR to repurchase the Class B noncontrolling membership interests in the event of a specified change in control of XPLR at a stated rate of return.
(e)XPLR may elect to pay the buyout price in XPLR non-voting common units, XPLR common units or cash (or any combination thereof), subject to conditions and limitations set forth in the applicable agreements. Percentages shown represent the maximum percentages XPLR expects it can pay in XPLR non-voting common units without the acquiescence of the Class B investor, subject to applicable closing conditions. Holders of the XPLR non-voting common units will have the right to receive pro rata quarterly cash distributions and the right to convert, subject to certain limitations, the XPLR non-voting common units into XPLR common units on a one-for-one basis.
In 2019, a subsidiary of XPLR sold Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Pipelines to a third-party investor. In 2024, XPLR exercised its buyout right and purchased 25% of the originally issued Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Pipelines for aggregate cash consideration of approximately $67 million. In September 2025, XPLR purchased the remaining outstanding Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Pipelines for approximately $219 million (see Note 4).
In 2019, a subsidiary of XPLR sold Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II to a third-party investor. In each of 2023 and 2024, XPLR exercised its buyout right and purchased 15% of the originally issued Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II for approximately $180 million and $187 million, respectively. In April 2025, XPLR exercised its buyout right and purchased the remaining outstanding Class B noncontrolling membership interests in XPLR Renewables II for approximately $931 million.
In 2019, a subsidiary of XPLR sold Class B noncontrolling membership interests in STX Midstream, XPLR's subsidiary which owned natural gas pipelines in Texas (see Note 2 – Disposal of Pipeline and Note 4), to a third-party investor. While the third-party investor owned the Class B noncontrolling membership interests in STX Midstream, the third-party investor received 12.5% of STX Midstream's distributable cash. During 2023, XPLR paid aggregate cash consideration of approximately $792 million to the third-party investor after electing to exercise the buyout right and purchase all of the Class B noncontrolling membership interests in STX Midstream.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss –
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Comprehensive<br>Income (Loss) Related to<br>Equity Method Investee | Total | ||||
| (millions) | |||||
| Balances, December 31, 2022 | $ | (16) | $ | (16) | |
| Other comprehensive income related to equity method investee | 2 | 2 | |||
| Balances, December 31, 2023 | (14) | (14) | |||
| Other comprehensive income related to equity method investee | 1 | 1 | |||
| Balances, December 31, 2024 | (13) | (13) | |||
| Other comprehensive income related to equity method investee | 2 | 2 | |||
| Balances, December 31, 2025 | $ | (11) | $ | (11) | |
| AOCI attributable to noncontrolling interest, December 31, 2025 | $ | (6) | $ | (6) | |
| AOCI attributable to XPLR, December 31, 2025 | $ | (5) | $ | (5) |
15. Related Party Transactions
Each project entered into O&M agreements and ASAs with subsidiaries of NEER whereby the projects pay a certain annual fee plus reimbursable costs incurred in connection with certain O&M and administrative services performed under these agreements. These services are reflected as operations and maintenance in XPLR's consolidated statements of income (loss). Certain projects have also entered into various types of agreements including those related to shared facilities and transmission lines, transmission line easements, technical support and development and construction coordination with subsidiaries of NEER whereby certain fees or cost reimbursements are paid to, or received by, certain subsidiaries of NEER. Costs incurred in connection with development and construction coordination provided by NEER primarily in connection with wind repowering of approximately $1,252 million and $103 million during 2025 and 2024, respectively, were capitalized and are reflected in property, plant and equipment – net on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets. Remaining costs under these agreements are reflected as operations and maintenance in XPLR's consolidated statements of income (loss).
Management Services Agreement (MSA) – Under the MSA, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NEE provides operational, management and administrative services to XPLR, including managing XPLR’s day-to-day affairs and providing individuals to act as XPLR’s executive officers and directors, in addition to those services that are provided under the existing O&M agreements and ASAs described above between NEER subsidiaries and XPLR subsidiaries. XPLR OpCo pays NEE an annual management fee equal to the greater of 1% of the sum of XPLR OpCo’s net income plus interest expense, income tax expense and depreciation and amortization expense less certain non-cash, non-recurring items for the most recently ended fiscal year and $4 million (as adjusted for inflation beginning in 2016), which is paid in quarterly installments with an additional payment each January to the extent 1% of the sum of XPLR OpCo’s net income plus interest expense, income tax expense and depreciation and amortization expense less certain non-cash, non-recurring items for the preceding fiscal year exceeds $4 million (as adjusted for inflation beginning in 2016). XPLR OpCo also made certain payments to NEE based on the achievement by XPLR OpCo of certain target quarterly distribution levels to its unitholders. In May 2023, the MSA was amended to suspend these payments to be paid by XPLR OpCo in respect to each calendar quarter beginning with the payment related to the period commencing on (and including) January 1, 2023 and expiring on (and including) December 31, 2026. XPLR’s O&M expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 include approximately $8 million, $8 million and $51 million, respectively, related to the MSA.
Cash Sweep and Credit Support Agreement (CSCS agreement) – XPLR OpCo is a party to the CSCS agreement with NEER under which NEER and certain of its affiliates provide credit support in the form of letters of credit and guarantees to satisfy XPLR’s subsidiaries’ contractual obligations. XPLR OpCo pays NEER an annual credit support fee based on the level and cost of the credit support provided, payable in quarterly installments. XPLR’s O&M expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 include approximately $10 million, $8 million and $8 million, respectively, related to the CSCS agreement and for the year ended December 31, 2025 also includes $(11) million related to true-up of amounts previously charged.
Table of Contents
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NEER and certain of its affiliates may withdraw funds (Project Sweeps) from XPLR OpCo under the CSCS agreement or XPLR OpCo's subsidiaries in connection with certain long-term debt agreements, and hold those funds in accounts belonging to NEER or its affiliates to the extent the funds are not required to pay project costs or otherwise required to be maintained by XPLR's subsidiaries. NEER and its affiliates may keep the funds until the financing agreements permit distributions to be made, or, in the case of XPLR OpCo, until such funds are required to make distributions or to pay expenses or other operating costs or XPLR OpCo otherwise demands the return of such funds. If NEER or its affiliates fail to return withdrawn funds when required by XPLR OpCo's subsidiaries’ financing agreements, the lenders will be entitled to draw on any credit support provided by NEER or its affiliates in the amount of such withdrawn funds. If NEER or one of its affiliates realizes any earnings on the withdrawn funds prior to the return of such funds, it will be permitted to retain those earnings, and will not pay interest on the withdrawn funds except as otherwise agreed upon with XPLR OpCo. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the cash sweep amounts held in accounts belonging to NEER or its affiliates were approximately $11 million and $127 million, respectively, and are included in due from related parties on XPLR’s consolidated balance sheets. During the year ended December 31, 2024, XPLR recorded interest income of approximately $36 million from NEER for cash sweep amounts held relating to proceeds from the sale of the Texas pipelines (see Note 4), which is reflected in other – net on the consolidated statement of income (loss).
Guarantees and Letters of Credit Entered into by Related Parties – Certain PPAs include requirements of the project entities to meet certain performance obligations. NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc. (NEECH) or NEER has provided letters of credit or guarantees for certain of these performance obligations and payment of any obligations from the transactions contemplated by the PPAs. In addition, certain financing agreements require cash and cash equivalents to be reserved for various purposes. In accordance with the terms of these financing agreements, guarantees from NEECH have been substituted in place of these cash and cash equivalents reserve requirements. Also, under certain financing agreements, indemnifications have been provided by NEECH. In addition, certain interconnection agreements and site certificates require letters of credit or a surety bond to secure certain payment or restoration obligations related to those agreements. At December 31, 2025, NEECH or NEER guaranteed or provided indemnifications, letters of credit or surety bonds totaling approximately $1.8 billion related to these obligations. NEECH also guarantees the Project Sweep amounts held in accounts belonging to NEER as described above.
Related Party Long-Term Debt – In connection with the December 2022 acquisition from NEER of Emerald Breeze, a subsidiary of XPLR acquired a note payable from a subsidiary of NEER relating to restricted cash reserve funds put in place for certain operational costs at the project based on a requirement of the differential membership investor. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the note payable was approximately $90 million and $85 million, respectively, and is included in long-term debt on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets. The note payable does not bear interest and does not have a maturity date.
Due to Related Parties – Noncurrent amounts due to related parties on XPLR's consolidated balance sheets primarily represent amounts owed by certain of XPLR's wind projects to NEER for costs incurred in connection with repowering of certain wind projects and to refund NEER for certain transmission costs paid on behalf of the wind projects. Amounts will be paid to NEER as the wind projects receive payments from third parties for related notes receivable recorded in noncurrent other assets on XPLR’s consolidated balance sheets.
Transportation and Fuel Management Agreements – In connection with the Texas pipelines (see Note 4), a subsidiary of XPLR assigned to a subsidiary of NEER certain gas commodity agreements in exchange for entering into transportation agreements and a fuel management agreement whereby the benefits of the gas commodity agreements (net of transportation paid to the XPLR subsidiary) are passed back to the XPLR subsidiary. At December 31, 2023, XPLR recognized approximately $17 million in revenues related to the transportation and fuel management agreements which are reflected in income from discontinued operations on the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Related Party Note Receivable – As part of the 2016 acquisition from NEER of Seiling Wind Investments, LLC, a subsidiary of XPLR acquired an approximately $25 million receivable from a subsidiary of NEER (Seiling related party note receivable) relating to operational performance issues at the related projects. The Seiling related party note receivable is intended to compensate XPLR for the operational performance issues and is supported in full by compensation expected from an equipment vendor under an undertaking the vendor has with NEER. This receivable bears interest at 7.1% per annum, is payable by NEER in equal semi-annual installments and matures in December 2035. For each of the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, XPLR received payments of approximately $2 million. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Seiling related party note receivable was approximately $17 million and $18 million, respectively, and, along with interest and related payments are reflected in noncontrolling interests on XPLR's consolidated financial statements.
Tax Allocations – In March 2024, NEE Equity, as holder of the Class P units, was allocated for the 2023 tax year taxable gains for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately $154 million from the transaction specified in the XPLR OpCo LP Agreement. See Note 2 – Income Taxes, Note 4 and Note 8.
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Concluded)
16. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings – XPLR, NEE, certain former executives of XPLR and certain current and former directors of XPLR are the named defendants in a purported federal securities class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California (Southern District of California) in July 2025 that seeks unspecified damages alleging that the defendants made false and misleading statements regarding XPLR's business model, XPLR distributions and arrangements relating to Class B noncontrolling members' interests under certain limited liability company agreements to which XPLR and certain of its subsidiaries are or were a party. The alleged class includes all persons or entities other than the defendants and certain affiliated parties of the defendants as named in the lawsuit who purchased or otherwise acquired XPLR securities between September 27, 2023 and January 27, 2025. In January 2026, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint expanding the putative class period to include all persons or entities other than the defendants and certain affiliated parties of the defendants as named in the lawsuit who purchased or otherwise acquired XPLR securities beginning on May 8, 2023. The defendants are vigorously defending against the claims in this proceeding and plan to file a motion to dismiss the complaint.
XPLR, NEE, certain former executives of XPLR and certain current and former directors of XPLR are the named defendants in a purported unitholder derivative action filed in the Southern District of California in August 2025. The complaint alleges, among other allegations, that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by making, or causing XPLR to make, false and misleading statements regarding XPLR's business model, distributions, financial arrangements and equity needs. The plaintiff seeks declaratory and monetary relief, changes to corporate governance and internal procedures, and attorneys’ fees and costs. In November 2025, the Southern District of California issued an order to stay proceedings pending resolution of the motion to dismiss phase in the purported federal securities class action lawsuit described above.
- Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
XPLR's previously reported condensed consolidated quarterly financial and share-based information has been retrospectively adjusted in the following table to reflect the changes resulting from the Meade pipeline investment being presented as income from discontinued operations. See Note 4.
| March 31(a) | June 30(a) | September 30(a) | December 31(a) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (millions, except per unit amounts) | ||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||
| Operating revenues | $ | 282 | $ | 342 | $ | 315 | $ | 249 |
| Operating income (loss) | $ | (233) | $ | 91 | $ | 5 | $ | (49) |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (307) | $ | 50 | $ | (61) | $ | (81) |
| Loss from discontinued operations | $ | (21) | $ | (14) | $ | (3) | $ | — |
| Earnings (loss) per common unit attributable to XPLR – basic and assuming dilution:(b) | ||||||||
| From continuing operations | $ | (0.94) | $ | 0.93 | $ | (0.37) | $ | 0.30 |
| From discontinued operations | $ | (0.11) | $ | (0.09) | $ | (0.03) | $ | — |
| 2024 | ||||||||
| Operating revenues | $ | 257 | $ | 360 | $ | 319 | $ | 294 |
| Operating income (loss) | $ | (21) | $ | 66 | $ | 49 | $ | (553) |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 13 | $ | 48 | $ | (64) | $ | (408) |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 22 | $ | 10 | $ | (19) | $ | (12) |
| Earnings (loss) per common unit attributable to XPLR – basic and assuming dilution:(b) | ||||||||
| From continuing operations | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.64 | $ | (0.31) | $ | (1.14) |
| From discontinued operations | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.12) | $ | (0.08) |
____________________
(a)In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring accruals necessary to present a fair statement of the amounts shown for such periods, have been made. Results of operations for an interim period generally will not give a true indication of results for the year. Variations in operations reported on a quarterly basis primarily reflect the seasonal nature of XPLR's business. The sum of the quarterly amounts may not equal the total for the year due to rounding.
(b)The sum of the quarterly amounts may not equal the total for the year due to rounding and changes in weighted-average number of common units outstanding.
Table of Contents
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2025, XPLR had performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of XPLR's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of XPLR concluded that XPLR's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2025.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
(a) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
(b) Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
XPLR is continuously seeking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its operations and of its internal controls. This results in refinements to processes throughout XPLR. However, there has been no change in XPLR's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during XPLR's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, XPLR's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
(b) During the three months ended December 31, 2025, no director or officer of XPLR adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable
Table of Contents
PART III – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item will be included under the headings "Business of the Annual Meeting," "Information About XPLR Infrastructure and Management" and "Corporate Governance and Board Matters" in XPLR's Proxy Statement which will be filed with the SEC in connection with the 2026 Annual Meeting of Unitholders (XPLR's Proxy Statement) and is incorporated herein by reference.
XPLR has adopted the XPLR Infrastructure, LP Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers (the Senior Financial Executive Code), which is applicable to the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and controller. The Senior Financial Executive Code is available under Corporate Governance in the Investor Relations section of XPLR’s internet website at www.xplrinfrastructure.com. Any amendments or waivers of the Senior Financial Executive Code which are required to be disclosed to unitholders under SEC rules will be disclosed on XPLR’s website at the address listed above.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will be included in XPLR's Proxy Statement under the headings "Executive Compensation" and "Corporate Governance and Board Matters" and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Unitholder Matters
The information required by this item relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will be included in XPLR's Proxy Statement under the heading "Information About XPLR Infrastructure and Management" and is incorporated herein by reference.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2025 with respect to equity compensation under the XPLR Infrastructure, LP 2024 Long Term Incentive Plan (2024 LTIP):
| Plan Category | Number of securities<br><br>to be issued upon<br><br>exercise of outstanding<br><br>options, warrants and<br><br>rights | Weighted-average exercise<br><br>price of outstanding<br><br>options, warrants and<br><br>rights | Number of securities<br><br>remaining available for<br><br>future issuance under<br><br>equity compensation<br><br>plans (excluding<br><br>securities reflected in<br><br>the first column) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | — | N/A | 645,022 | (a) |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | N/A | — | |
| Total | — | N/A | 645,022 |
____________________
(a) Excludes 155,706 unvested common units issued under the NextEra Energy Partners 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan that may be granted under the 2024 LTIP if not forfeited or otherwise unavailable for future grants.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item, to the extent applicable, will be included in XPLR's Proxy Statement under the heading "Corporate Governance and Board Matters" and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item will be included in XPLR's Proxy Statement under the heading "Audit-Related Matters" and is incorporated herein by reference.
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
__________________________
* Incorporated herein by reference.
XPLR agrees to furnish to the SEC upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt that XPLR has not filed as an exhibit pursuant to the exemption provided by Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable.
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 17, 2026
| XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP |
|---|
| (Registrant) |
| S. ALAN LIU |
| S. Alan Liu<br><br>President and Chief Executive Officer<br><br>(Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature and Title as of February 17, 2026:
| JESSICA GEOFFROY | WILLIAM J. GOUGH |
|---|---|
| Jessica Geoffroy | William J. Gough |
| Chief Financial Officer | Controller |
| (Principal Financial Officer) | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| JOHN W. KETCHUM | MICHAEL H. DUNNE |
| John W. Ketchum | Michael H. Dunne |
| Chairman of the Board and Director | Director |
| SUSAN DAVENPORT AUSTIN | MARK E. HICKSON |
| Susan Davenport Austin | Mark E. Hickson |
| Director | Director |
| BRIAN W. BOLSTER | PETER H. KIND |
| Brian W. Bolster | Peter H. Kind |
| Director | Director |
| ROBERT J. BYRNE | |
| Robert J. Byrne | |
| Director |
80
Document
Exhibit 4.12
Description of Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
As of February 1, 2026 (“Description Date”), XPLR Infrastructure, LP (“XPLR”) had one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934—its common units representing limited partner interests in XPLR (“common units”). The common units are listed on The New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “XIFR.”
The following description is as of the Description Date, unless otherwise noted.
In this Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Description”), “XPLR,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and similar terms refer to XPLR Infrastructure, LP unless the context requires otherwise.
Index
Page
Description of Common Units 1
Provisions of the Partnership Agreements and Other Arrangements Relating to Cash Distributions 3
Material Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement 13
Material Provisions of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement 27
DESCRIPTION OF COMMON UNITS
The Units
All holders of common units are entitled to participate in partnership distributions and exercise the rights or privileges available to limited partners under our partnership agreement. For a description of the rights and privileges of limited partners under our partnership agreement, including voting rights, see “Material Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement.” For a description of the relative rights and preferences of our unitholders in and to partnership distributions, please read “Provisions of the Partnership Agreements and Other Arrangements Relating to Cash Distributions.” See “Potential Issuances of Voting and Non-Voting Common Units under Existing Financing Arrangements” below for an overview of potential units that may be issued under financing arrangements that we have outstanding as of the Description Date.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Duties
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. serves as registrar and transfer agent for our common units. We pay all fees charged by the transfer agent for transfers of common units, except the following that must be paid by unitholders:
· surety bond premiums to replace lost or stolen certificates, taxes and other governmental charges;
· special charges for services requested by a common unitholder; and
· other similar fees or charges.
There is no charge to unitholders for disbursements of our cash distributions. We indemnify the transfer agent, its agents and each of their stockholders, directors, officers and employees against all claims and losses that may arise out of acts performed or omitted for their activities in those capacities, except for any liability due to any gross negligence or intentional misconduct of the indemnified person or entity.
Resignation or Removal
The transfer agent may resign, by notice to us, or be removed by us. The resignation or removal of the transfer agent will become effective upon our appointment of a successor transfer agent and registrar and its acceptance of the appointment. If no successor has been appointed and has accepted the appointment within 30 days after notice of the resignation or removal, our general partner may act as the transfer agent and registrar until a successor is appointed.
Transfer of Common Units
By transfer of common units in accordance with our partnership agreement, each transferee of common units will be admitted as a limited partner with respect to our common units transferred when such transfer or admission is reflected in our register and such limited partner becomes the record holder of our common units so transferred. Each transferee:
· will become bound and will be deemed to have agreed to be bound by the terms of our partnership agreement;
· will be deemed to represent that the transferee has the capacity, power and authority to enter into our partnership agreement; and
· will be deemed to make the consents, acknowledgements and waivers contained in our partnership agreement.
We are entitled to treat the nominee holder of a common unit as the absolute owner in the event such nominee is the record holder of such common unit. In that case, the beneficial holder’s rights are limited solely to those that it has against the nominee holder as a result of any agreement between the beneficial owner and the nominee holder.
Common units are securities and are transferable according to the laws governing transfer of securities. Until a common unit has been transferred on our register, we and the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the unit as the absolute owner for all purposes, except as otherwise required by law or stock exchange regulations.
Potential Issuances of Voting and Non-Voting Common Units under Existing Financing Arrangements
As of the Description Date, we have 2.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (the “convertible notes”) outstanding, which convertible notes are guaranteed by XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP (“XPLR OpCo”). A holder of the convertible notes may convert all or a portion of its convertible notes in accordance with the indenture pursuant to which the convertible notes were issued. Upon conversion, we will pay cash up to the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes to be converted and pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, our common units or a combination of cash and our common units, at our election, in respect of the remainder, if any, of our conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes being converted.
We also have entered into financing arrangements under which we have the option (each, a “Buyout Right”), subject to certain limitations and adjustments, to purchase certain membership interests in project entities using our non-voting common units representing limited partner interests in XPLR (“non-voting common units”) (a “Non-Voting Buyout Right”) or using our voting common units. Following an exercise of any Non-Voting Buyout Right, the non-voting common units will have, among other terms, the right to receive pro rata quarterly cash distributions and the right to convert, subject to certain limitations and adjustments, the non-voting common units into our common units on a one-for-one basis. We have entered into registration rights agreements with respect to these financings. Please see XPLR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to which this Description is an exhibit (“Form 10-K”) for additional information regarding these financing arrangements.
- 2 -
PROVISIONS OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS RELATING TO CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our available cash (as defined below, with respect to each quarter) to our unitholders. Our cash flow is generated from distributions we receive from XPLR OpCo. Our ability to make distributions to our unitholders depends on the ability of XPLR OpCo to make cash distributions to its limited partners, including us. Set forth below is a summary of the significant provisions of our partnership agreement, the partnership agreement of XPLR OpCo (“XPLR OpCo partnership agreement”) and certain other agreements as they relate to cash distributions. The summary below is as of the Description Date and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all of the provisions of the partnership agreements, each of which is filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K. The summary is also qualified in its entirety by reference to the other agreements referenced below, each of which is filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K. Under Delaware law and the provisions of our partnership agreement, we may also issue additional series or classes of limited partnership interests, such as the Series A convertible preferred units representing limited partner interests in XPLR (“Series A preferred units”) and the non-voting common units, that may have rights which differ from the rights applicable to our common units as described in this Description.
As described below under “—Provisions of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions,” XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners GP, LLC (“XPLR OpCo GP”) has broad discretion to make certain decisions under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, including with respect to the establishment of cash reserves. Since we own all of the equity interests of XPLR OpCo GP, decisions made by XPLR OpCo GP under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement are ultimately made at the direction of our Board of Directors (“Board”) or, in certain limited circumstances, our general partner.
XPLR OpCo previously issued its Class B, Series 1 limited partner interests and its Class B, Series 2 limited partner interests (together, the “OpCo Class B units”), none of which OpCo Class B units are currently outstanding. Any distributions on the OpCo Class B units would be separate from distributions of available cash to the holders of XPLR OpCo’s voting and non-voting common units, and the available distribution amount for the OpCo Class B units would be calculated separately from available cash, operating surplus, capital surplus and minimum quarterly distributions pursuant to the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, and as a result such OpCo Class B units would not be included in the determinations discussed below. See also “Material Provisions of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement—Issuance of Additional Partnership Interests—OpCo Class B Units.”
On December 27, 2023, XPLR OpCo issued 1,000,000 of its Class P limited partner interests (the “OpCo Class P Units”) to NextEra Energy Equity Partners, LP (“NEE Equity”). NEE Equity, as holder of the OpCo Class P Units, is not entitled to receive any distributions of available cash or any other distributions of assets or property of XPLR OpCo with respect to these units, other than in connection with a liquidation of XPLR OpCo as specified in the XPLR OpCo LP Agreement. See “Material Provisions of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement—Issuance of Additional Partnership Interests—OpCo Class P Units.”
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions
Distributions of Available Cash by XPLR
Our partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, we distribute all of our available cash first to holders of Series A preferred units, if any, in an amount equal to the Series A distribution amount (as specified in our partnership agreement and excluding any portion of the Series A distribution amount paid in Series A preferred units), and then to all holders of our common units and non-voting common units of record on the applicable record date. Generally, our available cash is all cash on hand at the date of determination in respect of such quarter (including any expected distributions from XPLR OpCo), less the amount of cash reserves established by our Board. Our available cash does not include any proceeds received for the sale of any Series A preferred units or our securities that rank pari passu with the Series A preferred units as to distributions. We expect XPLR OpCo to establish cash reserves prior to making distributions, if any, to our partnership to pay costs and expenses of our subsidiaries, in addition to our expenses, as well as any debt service requirements, future capital expenditures and to provide for the exercise of the buyout rights relating to noncontrolling Class B members’ interest under certain limited liability company agreements to which XPLR and certain of its subsidiaries is a party
- 3 -
or by which it is bound, or its assets are subject or otherwise for the proper conduct of XPLR OpCo’s business. Our cash flow is generated from distributions we receive from XPLR OpCo each quarter.
Units Eligible for Distribution
As of the Description Date, the only classes of our limited partnership interests for which units were outstanding were common units and Special Voting Units. Our partnership agreement also provides for the issuance of non-voting common units and Series A preferred units; however, no non-voting common units or Series A preferred units were outstanding as of the Description Date. See “Description of Common Units—Potential Issuances of Voting and Non-Voting Common Units under Existing Financing Arrangements” above for an overview of potential units that may be issued under financing arrangements that we have outstanding as of the Description Date.
Each common unit (including each non-voting common unit) is entitled to receive distributions (including upon liquidation) on a pro rata basis. Series A preferred units, if any, are entitled to receive distributions in an amount equal to the Series A distribution amount (as specified in our partnership agreement and excluding any portion of the Series A distribution amount paid in Series A preferred units). Special Voting Units are not entitled to receive any distributions. We may issue additional units to fund the redemption of XPLR OpCo’s common units tendered by NEE Equity under the exchange agreement between XPLR, XPLR OpCo and NEE Equity or under other financing arrangements that we have outstanding. Under Delaware law and the provisions of our partnership agreement, we may also issue additional series or classes of limited partnership interests that, as determined by our Board, may have rights which differ from the rights applicable to our common units as described in this Description.
General Partner Interest
Our general partner owns a non-economic, general partner interest in us, which does not entitle it to receive cash distributions. However, to the extent our general partner owns common units or other equity securities in us, it will be entitled to receive cash distributions on any such interests. Similarly, to the extent our general partner owns units that have voting rights, it will be entitled to exercise its voting power with respect to such interests.
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation
If we dissolve in accordance with our partnership agreement, we will sell or otherwise dispose of our assets in a process called liquidation. We will first apply the proceeds of liquidation to discharge any outstanding liabilities, next to holders of Series A preferred units, if any, to satisfy the applicable liquidation preference, and finally to our holders of our common units (including non-voting common units) on a pro rata basis.
Provisions of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions
Distributions of Available Cash by XPLR OpCo
General
The XPLR OpCo partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, XPLR OpCo distribute all of its available cash to its unitholders of record on the applicable record date.
Definition of Available Cash
Available cash generally means, for any quarter, the sum of all cash and cash equivalents on hand at the end of that quarter plus the amount of excess funds borrowed by NextEra Energy Resources, LLC (“NEER”) which remain unreturned:
· less, the amount of cash reserves established by XPLR OpCo GP to:
o provide for the proper conduct of XPLR OpCo’s business, including reserves for expected debt service requirements and future capital expenditures;
- 4 -
o comply with applicable law or XPLR OpCo’s debt instruments or other agreements, including to pay any amount necessary to make IDR Fee payments (which are certain payments from XPLR OpCo to NextEra Energy Management Partners, LP, as manager (“NEE Management”) as a component of the management services agreement among XPLR, NEE Management, XPLR OpCo and our general partner (“Management Services Agreement”) that are based on the achievement by XPLR OpCo of certain target quarterly distribution levels to its unitholders) with respect to that quarter based on XPLR OpCo GP’s determination of the amount of available cash that would otherwise be available for distribution in that quarter; and
o provide funds for distributions to XPLR OpCo’s unitholders for any one or more of the next four quarters, provided that XPLR OpCo may not establish cash reserves for future distributions pursuant to this provision if the effect of the establishment of such reserves prevents XPLR OpCo from distributing an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution with respect to all voting and non-voting common units;
· less, the amount of cash contributed by an affiliate of XPLR OpCo GP (other than us or our subsidiaries) for the purpose of funding construction costs of our subsidiaries that would otherwise constitute available cash;
· plus, if XPLR OpCo GP so determines, all or any portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand on the date of determination of available cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of such quarter.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, available cash does not include any proceeds received pursuant to the purchase of or contribution of cash in exchange for any XPLR OpCo preferred units with economically equivalent rights to the Series A preferred units (“OpCo Series A preferred units”) or any OpCo Series A parity securities (limited partnership interests of OpCo that rank pari passu as to distributions with the OpCo Series A preferred units) issued in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement.
Because the amount of available cash for any quarter includes the amount of excess funds borrowed by NEER which remain unreturned, XPLR OpCo will be required to demand the return of all or a portion of such funds from NEER and distribute such funds to its unitholders to the extent that XPLR OpCo GP is not permitted to reserve the amount of such funds under its partnership agreement, including any reserves established to fund future distributions. In addition, the purpose and effect of the last bullet point above is to allow XPLR OpCo GP, if it so decides, to use cash from working capital borrowings made after the end of the quarter but on or before the date of determination of available cash for that quarter to pay distributions to unitholders. Under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, working capital borrowings are generally borrowings under a credit facility, commercial paper facility or similar financing arrangement that are used solely for working capital purposes or to pay distributions to partners, provided that XPLR OpCo intends to repay the borrowings within 12 months with funds other than from additional working capital borrowings.
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
To the extent XPLR OpCo has available cash after the establishment of cash reserves and the payment of expenses, including: (i) expenses of XPLR OpCo GP and its affiliates; (ii) our expenses; and (iii) payments to NEER and its affiliates under the Management Services Agreement and the cash sweep and credit agreement by and between XPLR OpCo and NEER (the “CSCS Agreement”), we contemplate that XPLR OpCo would pay a minimum quarterly distribution to the holders of its voting and non-voting common units, including us, of $0.1875 per unit, or $0.75 per unit on an annualized basis.
Incentive Distribution Right Fee
Under the Management Services Agreement, NEE Management is entitled to receive an incentive distribution right fee (“IDR Fee”) that increases based on the hypothetical amount of adjusted available cash from operating surplus that XPLR OpCo would be able to distribute to its voting and non-voting common unitholders. Since the IDR Fee is paid from XPLR OpCo’s total cash on hand and increases depending on the hypothetical amount of distributions XPLR OpCo would have made to its voting and non-voting common unitholders, the IDR Fee effectively reduces the amount of cash XPLR OpCo has available for distribution to its voting and non-voting common unitholders. The right to receive the IDR Fee under the Management Services Agreement has been
- 5 -
suspended in respect of each calendar quarter beginning with the IDR Fee related to the period commencing on (and including) January 1, 2023 and expiring on (and including) December 31, 2026 (the “IDR Fee Suspension”). The discussions below do not reflect the IDR Fee Suspension and assume that NEE Management continues to retain the right to receive the IDR Fee. See “—Payments of the Incentive Distribution Right Fee” for additional information.
Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus
General
All cash distributed to XPLR OpCo unitholders will be characterized as either being paid from “operating surplus” or “capital surplus.” XPLR OpCo will treat distributions of available cash from operating surplus differently than distributions of available cash from capital surplus.
Operating Surplus
Operating surplus of XPLR OpCo is defined as:
· $35.0 million (as described below); plus
· all of XPLR OpCo’s cash receipts after the closing of our initial public offering on July 1, 2014 (“IPO”), excluding cash from interim capital transactions (as defined below), provided that cash receipts from the termination of certain hedges prior to their specified termination date will be included in operating surplus in equal quarterly installments over the remaining scheduled life of such hedges; plus
· working capital borrowings by XPLR OpCo made after the end of a quarter but on or before the date of determination of operating surplus for that quarter; plus
· cash distributions paid on equity issued, other than equity issued in connection with the IPO, to finance all or a portion of the construction, replacement, acquisition, development or improvement of a capital asset in respect of the period beginning on the date that XPLR OpCo enters into a binding obligation to commence the construction, replacement, acquisition, development or improvement of a capital asset and ending on the earlier to occur of the date that the capital asset commences commercial service and the date that it is abandoned or disposed of; plus
· cash distributions paid on equity issued to pay the construction period interest on debt incurred, including periodic net payments under related interest rate swap arrangements, or to pay construction period distributions on equity issued, to finance the construction, replacement, acquisition, development or improvement of a capital asset described in the preceding bullet; plus
· the portion of any IDR Fee payments made to NEE Management as a result of cash distributions paid on equity issued as described in the preceding two bullets; less
· all of XPLR OpCo’s operating expenditures after the closing of the IPO; less
· the amount of cash reserves established by XPLR OpCo GP to provide funds for future operating expenditures; less
· all working capital borrowings not repaid within 12 months after having been incurred, or repaid within such 12-month period with the proceeds of additional working capital borrowings.
As described above, the definition of operating surplus does not solely reflect actual cash on hand that is available for distribution to unitholders of XPLR OpCo and is not limited to cash generated by operations. For example, the definition of operating surplus includes a provision that enables us to direct XPLR OpCo to distribute as operating surplus up to $35.0 million of cash that XPLR OpCo receives in the future from non-operating sources such as asset sales, issuances of securities and long-term borrowings that would otherwise be distributed as capital surplus. As a result, XPLR OpCo may distribute as operating surplus up to such amount of any cash that it receives from non-operating sources. In addition, the effect of including certain cash distributions on equity interests in operating surplus, as described above, increases operating surplus by the amount of any such cash distributions.
- 6 -
The proceeds of working capital borrowings increase operating surplus and repayments of working capital borrowings are generally operating expenditures that reduce operating surplus at the time of repayment. However, if XPLR OpCo does not repay working capital borrowings, which increase operating surplus, during the 12-month period following the borrowings, they will be deemed to have been repaid at the end of such period, thus decreasing operating surplus at that time. When the working capital borrowings are subsequently repaid, they will not be treated as a further reduction in operating surplus because operating surplus will have been previously reduced by the deemed repayment.
Interim capital transactions are defined as:
· borrowings, refinancings or refundings of indebtedness, other than working capital borrowings and items purchased on open account or for a deferred purchase price in the ordinary course of business, and sales of debt securities;
· sales of equity securities;
· sales or other voluntary or involuntary dispositions of assets, other than sales or other dispositions of inventory, accounts receivable and other assets in the ordinary course of business and sales or other dispositions of assets as part of normal asset retirements or replacements; and
· capital contributions received.
Operating expenditures are defined as, without duplication:
· all cash expenditures of XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries, including taxes, reimbursements of expenses of XPLR OpCo GP and its affiliates, director and employee compensation of XPLR OpCo’s subsidiaries, payments under the Management Services Agreement and the CSCS Agreement for services rendered, including management and credit support fees, or in reimbursement of draws made on credit support provided by NEER or its affiliates, debt service payments (including principal amortization payments under financing arrangements of XPLR OpCo’s subsidiaries), payments made in the ordinary course of business under certain hedge contracts (provided that payments made in connection with the termination of any such hedge contract prior to the expiration of its settlement or termination date specified therein will be included in operating expenditures in equal quarterly installments over the remaining scheduled life of such hedge contract and amounts paid in connection with the initial purchase of such a contract will be amortized at the life of such contract), maintenance capital expenditures (as described below), and repayment of working capital borrowings;
· all expenses and other cash expenditures (other than U.S. federal income taxes) of XPLR, including reimbursements of expenses of its general partner and its affiliates as set forth in the Management Services Agreement and of NEER and its affiliates as set forth in the CSCS Agreement; and
· payments of the IDR Fee to NEE Management, other than payments of the IDR Fee described in the sixth bullet in the definition of “operating surplus.”
Notwithstanding the foregoing, operating expenditures will not include:
· repayments of working capital borrowings where such borrowings have previously been deemed to have been repaid, as described above;
· payments, including prepayments and prepayment penalties, of principal of and premium on indebtedness other than working capital borrowings and financing arrangements of XPLR OpCo’s subsidiaries;
· expansion capital expenditures, as described below;
· payment of transaction expenses, including taxes, relating to interim capital transactions;
· distributions to unitholders of XPLR OpCo; or
· repurchases of partnership interests (including cash redemptions under the exchange agreement between XPLR, XPLR OpCo and NEE Equity), excluding repurchases XPLR OpCo makes to satisfy obligations under employee benefit plans.
- 7 -
Capital Surplus
Capital surplus is defined in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement as any distribution of available cash in excess of its cumulative operating surplus. Accordingly, except as described above, capital surplus would generally be generated by:
· borrowings other than working capital borrowings;
· sales of XPLR OpCo’s equity and debt securities; and
· sales or other dispositions of assets, other than inventory, accounts receivable and other assets sold in the ordinary course of business or as part of ordinary course retirement or replacement of assets.
Characterization of Cash Distributions
The XPLR OpCo partnership agreement requires that it treat all available cash distributed as coming from operating surplus until the sum of all available cash distributed since the IPO equals the operating surplus from the IPO through the end of the quarter immediately preceding that distribution. The XPLR OpCo partnership agreement requires that XPLR OpCo treat any amount distributed in excess of operating surplus, regardless of the source, as capital surplus. We do not anticipate that XPLR OpCo will make any distributions from capital surplus.
Capital Expenditures
Expansion capital expenditures are cash expenditures incurred for those acquisitions or capital improvements that are expected to increase XPLR OpCo’s operating income, operating capacity or operating cash flow over the long term. Examples of expansion capital expenditures include the acquisition of equipment or additional clean energy projects to the extent such capital expenditures are expected to increase XPLR OpCo’s operating capacity or its operating income. Expansion capital expenditures include interest expense associated with borrowings used to fund expansion capital expenditures.
Maintenance capital expenditures are cash expenditures incurred for those acquisitions or capital improvements that are made to maintain, over the long term, operating capacity, operating income or operating cash flow. Examples of maintenance capital expenditures are expenditures to repair, refurbish or replace XPLR OpCo’s clean energy projects, to upgrade transmission networks, to maintain equipment reliability, integrity and safety and to comply with laws and regulations.
Distributions and Payments of Available Cash from Operating Surplus
XPLR OpCo will make distributions or payments of 100% of its available cash from operating surplus for any quarter in the following order of priority:
· first, as distributions or payments with respect to XPLR OpCo’s Series A preferred units, if any; and
· second, to the holders of XPLR OpCo’s voting and non-voting common units, pro rata.
Holders of OpCo Class B units would not be entitled to distributions from available cash. Holders of OpCo Class P Units would not be entitled to distributions from available cash, other than in connection with a liquidation of XPLR OpCo.
Payments of the Incentive Distribution Right Fee
Under the Management Services Agreement, NEE Management is entitled to the IDR Fee, which is calculated based on the hypothetical amount of adjusted available cash from operating surplus that XPLR OpCo would be able to distribute to its voting and non-voting common unitholders after the minimum quarterly and the target quarterly distribution levels described below have been achieved. The right to receive the IDR Fee is currently held by NEE Management, but may be assigned. The right to receive the IDR Fee under the Management Services Agreement has been suspended in respect of each calendar quarter beginning with the IDR Fee related to the period commencing on (and including) January 1, 2023 and expiring on (and including) December 31, 2026. The discussions below do not reflect the IDR Fee Suspension and assume that NEE Management continues to retain the
- 8 -
right to receive the IDR Fee. Although cash used to pay the IDR Fee will be an operating expenditure, the description below assumes that any IDR Fee will not reduce XPLR OpCo’s operating surplus and will be paid with available cash from operating surplus. We use this assumption in the description below for illustrative purposes to demonstrate that the calculation of IDR Fee payments for each quarter will be based on hypothetical amounts that would be available for distribution to XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders if the IDR Fee was not an operating expense and NEE Management held a class of equity interests in XPLR OpCo entitled to such distributions based on the achievement of the target quarterly distribution levels. Once the amount of IDR Fee payments is determined, the amount will be classified as an operating expense and operating surplus will be reduced by a like amount before available cash is distributed by XPLR OpCo to its voting and non-voting common unitholders on a pro rata basis.
If, for any quarter, XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash equal to or greater than $39,250,000.00 plus the product of (i) the XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common units outstanding on the record date for that quarter and (ii) $0.7625 per XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unit (subject to adjustment under the Management Services Agreement) (such sum, the “maximum incentive amount”), XPLR OpCo will calculate the IDR Fee using the hypothetical distributions of adjusted available cash to XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders described below:
· first, to make a payment of $39,250,000.00 to NEE Management in respect of the IDR Fee and to distribute any remaining adjusted available cash to all XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders, pro rata, until the sum of fees paid to NEE Management and distributions deemed to be made to XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders is equal to the maximum incentive amount; and
· thereafter, to distribute 100% of any remaining adjusted available cash to all XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders, pro rata.
If, for any quarter, XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash (i) less than the maximum incentive amount but (ii) equal to or greater than the sum of (a) $14,039,546.64 and (b) the product of (1) the XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common units outstanding on the record date for that quarter and (2) $0.3525 per XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unit (subject to adjustment under the Management Services Agreement) (such sum calculated in accordance with (ii), the “base incentive amount”), XPLR OpCo will calculate the IDR Fee using the hypothetical distributions of adjusted available cash to XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders described below:
· first, to make a payment of $14,039,546.64 to NEE Management in respect of the IDR Fee and to distribute any remaining adjusted available cash to all XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders, pro rata, until the sum of fees paid to NEE Management and distributions deemed to be made to XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders is equal to the base incentive amount; and
· thereafter, to distribute 75% of any remaining adjusted available cash to all XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders, pro rata, and to make a payment of 25% of any remaining adjusted available cash to NEE Management in respect of the IDR Fee;
provided that, in each case, the IDR Fee will be paid until (x) the aggregate deemed per XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unit distribution to XPLR OpCo unitholders equals (y) the per XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unit distribution declared by XPLR OpCo to XPLR OpCo unitholders in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement for the applicable quarter. In no event will the aggregate IDR Fee for such quarter exceed $39,250,000.00.
If, for any quarter, XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash less than the base incentive amount, then, XPLR OpCo will calculate the IDR Fee using the hypothetical distributions of adjusted available cash described below, provided that the hypothetical distributions to XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders set forth below will be calculated as though the total XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common units outstanding is equal to the base unit amount:
- 9 -
· first, to distribute 100% to all XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders, pro rata, until each voting and non-voting common unitholder is deemed to have received a total of $0.215625 per unit (or 115% of the minimum quarterly distribution) for that quarter;
· second, to distribute 85% to all XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders, pro rata, and to make a payment of 15% to NEE Management in respect of the IDR Fee, until each voting and non-voting common unitholder is deemed to have received a total of $0.234375 per unit (or 125% of the minimum quarterly distribution) for that quarter;
· third, to distribute 75% to all XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders, pro rata, and to make a payment of 25% to NEE Management in respect of the IDR Fee, until each common unitholder is deemed to have received a total of $0.281250 per unit (or 150% of the minimum quarterly distribution) for that quarter; and
· thereafter, to distribute 50% to all XPLR OpCo common unitholders, pro rata, and to make a payment of 50% to NEE Management in respect of the IDR Fee;
provided that, in each case, the IDR Fee will be paid until (x) the aggregate deemed per XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unit distribution to XPLR OpCo unitholders equals (y) the per XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unit distribution declared by XPLR OpCo to XPLR OpCo unitholders in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement for the applicable quarter. Further, if XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash less than the base incentive amount for any quarter, the aggregate IDR Fee for such quarter will not exceed $14,039,546.64.
As used in this Description, “base unit amount” means 155,676,955 XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common units, subject to proportional adjustment in the event of any distribution, combination or subdivision (whether effected by a distribution payable in units or otherwise) of XPLR OpCo partnership interests in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement or in any redemption, repurchase, acquisition or similar transaction by XPLR OpCo of XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common units.
“Adjusted available cash” means, in respect of any quarter, any remaining available cash that would be deemed to be operating surplus under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement before giving effect to the payment of the IDR Fee and after giving effect to the payment of the Series A distribution amount; provided that, if XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash less than the base incentive amount for any quarter, “adjusted available cash” means, in respect of such quarter, any remaining available cash that would be deemed to be operating surplus under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement before giving effect to the payment of the IDR Fee, after giving effect to the payment of the Series A distribution amount, and after subtracting the aggregate amount that would be required to be distributed to XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders to equal the product of the base unit amount on the applicable record date for such quarter multiplied by the first target quarterly distribution.
Percentage Allocations of Adjusted Available Cash from Operating Surplus
Adjusted Available Cash Equal to or Greater than the Maximum Incentive Amount
The following table sets forth the percentage allocations of adjusted available cash from operating surplus between NEE Management (in respect of the IDR Fee) and XPLR OpCo’s voting and non-voting common unitholders (in respect of their voting and non-voting common units), in distributions to voting and non-voting common unitholders equal to or greater than $0.7625 per XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unit and assuming that XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash from operating surplus in an aggregate amount equal to or greater than the base incentive amount for a particular quarter. For illustrative purposes (as described above), the following also assumes that the IDR Fee is paid with available cash from operating surplus and does not constitute an operating expenditure. The percentage interests assume that NEE Management has not assigned its right to the IDR Fee and do not reflect the IDR Fee Suspension.
- 10 -
| Marginal Percentage<br><br>Interest in Adjusted Available Cash | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total Quarterly<br><br>Distribution per<br><br>XPLR OpCo<br><br>Voting and Non-Voting Common Unit<br><br>Target Amount | XPLR OpCo<br><br>Voting and<br><br>Non-Voting<br><br>Common<br><br>Unitholders | NEE<br><br>Management |
| equal to or above $0.7625 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Adjusted Available Cash Less than the Maximum Incentive Amount but Greater than or Equal to the Base Incentive Amount
The following table sets forth the percentage allocations of adjusted available cash from operating surplus between NEE Management (in respect of the IDR Fee) and XPLR OpCo’s voting and non-voting common unitholders (in respect of their voting and non-voting common units), in distributions to voting and non-voting common unitholders below $0.7625, but equal to or above $0.3525, per XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unit and assuming that XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash from operating surplus in an aggregate amount equal to or greater than the base incentive amount for a particular quarter. For illustrative purposes (as described above), the following also assumes that the IDR Fee is paid with available cash from operating surplus and does not constitute an operating expenditure. The percentage interests assume that NEE Management has not assigned its right to the IDR Fee and do not reflect the IDR Fee Suspension.
| Marginal Percentage<br><br>Interest in Adjusted Available Cash | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total Quarterly<br><br>Distribution per<br><br>XPLR OpCo<br><br>Voting and Non-Voting Common Unit<br><br>Target Amount | XPLR OpCo<br><br>Voting and<br><br>Non-Voting<br><br>Common<br><br>Unitholders | NEE<br><br>Management |
| equal to or above $0.3525 but below $0.7625 | 75.0% | 25.0% |
Adjusted Available Cash Less than Base Incentive Amount
The following table sets forth the percentage allocations of adjusted available cash from operating surplus between NEE Management (in respect of the IDR Fee) and XPLR OpCo’s voting and non-voting common unitholders (in respect of their voting and non-voting common units), assuming that XPLR OpCo has adjusted available cash from operating surplus in an aggregate amount less than the base incentive amount for a particular quarter, and based on the specified target quarterly distribution levels. For illustrative purposes (as described above), the following also assumes that the IDR Fee is paid with available cash from operating surplus and does not constitute an operating expenditure. The amounts set forth under “Marginal Percentage Interest in Adjusted Available Cash” are the percentage interests of NEE Management (in respect of the IDR Fee) and the XPLR OpCo voting and non-voting common unitholders (in respect of their voting and non-voting common units) in any adjusted available cash from operating surplus XPLR OpCo distributes to voting and non-voting common unitholders and pays in respect of the IDR Fee, corresponding to the incremental amounts of distributions to voting and non-voting common unitholders in the column “Total Quarterly Distribution per XPLR OpCo Voting and Non-Voting Common Unit Target Amount.” The percentage interests shown for XPLR OpCo’s unitholders and NEE Management for the minimum quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly distribution. The percentage interests assume that NEE Management has not assigned its right to the IDR Fee and do not reflect the IDR Fee Suspension.
- 11 -
| Marginal Percentage<br><br>Interest in Adjusted<br><br>Available Cash | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total QuarterlyDistribution perXPLR OpCo Votingand Non-Voting Common UnitTarget Amount | XPLR OpCo<br><br>Voting and<br><br>Non-Voting<br><br>Common<br><br>Unitholders | NEE<br><br>Management | |||
| Minimum Quarterly Distribution | 100.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |
| First Target Quarterly Distribution | above 0.1875up to 0.215625 | 100.0 | % | 0.0 | % |
| Second Target Quarterly Distribution | above 0.215625up to 0.234375 | 85.0 | % | 15.0 | % |
| Third Target Quarterly Distribution | above 0.234375up to 0.281250 | 75.0 | % | 25.0 | % |
| Thereafter | above 0.281250 | 50.0 | % | 50.0 | % |
All values are in US Dollars.
Distributions from Capital Surplus
How Distributions from Capital Surplus Will Be Made
XPLR OpCo will make distributions of available cash from capital surplus, if any, in the following manner:
· first, to the holders of the Series A preferred units, if any, as provided above;
· second, to the holders of XPLR OpCo’s common units and non-voting common units, pro rata until the minimum quarterly distribution is reduced to zero, as described below under “—Effect of a Distribution from Capital Surplus”; and
· thereafter, as if such distributions were from operating surplus, provided that because the minimum quarterly distribution is reduced to zero, XPLR OpCo will pay the IDR Fee at the highest level as described below.
The preceding discussion is based on (1) the assumption that XPLR OpCo does not issue any additional classes of equity securities, (2) the fact that holders of OpCo Class B units would not be entitled to such distributions and (3) the fact that holders of OpCo Class P Units are not entitled to such distributions, other than in connection with a liquidation.
Effect of a Distribution from Capital Surplus
The XPLR OpCo partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital surplus as the repayment of the initial unit price on XPLR OpCo’s common units (equal to the IPO price of $25.00 per common unit), which is a return of capital. The initial unit price less any distributions of capital surplus per unit is referred to as the “unrecovered initial unit price.” Each time a distribution of capital surplus is made, the minimum quarterly distribution and the target quarterly distribution levels will be reduced in the same proportion as the corresponding reduction in the unrecovered initial unit price. Any distribution of capital surplus before the unrecovered initial unit price is reduced to zero cannot be applied to the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution.
Once XPLR OpCo distributes capital surplus on a voting and non-voting common unit in an amount equal to the initial unit price, the minimum quarterly distribution and the target quarterly distribution levels will be equal to zero. XPLR OpCo will then make all future distributions from operating surplus to voting and non-voting common unitholders, pro rata, after making required distributions, if any, to Series A preferred unitholders. However, once the minimum quarterly distribution and the target quarterly distribution levels are reduced to zero, XPLR OpCo will pay the IDR Fee to NEE Management at the highest level, which will be equal to 100% of any distributions paid to the voting and non-voting common unitholders, effectively reducing the total cash available for distributions to unitholders. See “—Incentive Distribution Right Fee” above.
- 12 -
Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and the Target Quarterly Distribution Levels
In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and target quarterly distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital surplus, if XPLR OpCo combines its units into fewer units or subdivides its units into a greater number of units, it will proportionately adjust:
· the minimum quarterly distribution;
· the target quarterly distribution levels; and
· the unrecovered initial unit price.
For example, if a two-for-one split of XPLR OpCo’s common units should occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the target distribution levels and the unrecovered initial unit price would each be reduced to 50% of its initial level. XPLR OpCo will not make any adjustment by reason of the issuance of additional units for cash or property.
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation
If XPLR OpCo dissolves in accordance with its partnership agreement, it will sell or otherwise dispose of its assets in a process called liquidation. XPLR OpCo will first apply the proceeds of liquidation to discharge any outstanding liabilities, including any payments of the IDR Fee to which NEE Management is entitled, next to holders of OpCo Series A preferred units, if any, to satisfy the applicable liquidation preference, and finally to holders of XPLR OpCo’s voting common units, non-voting common units and OpCo Class P Units in proportion to their respective positive capital account balances.
MATERIAL PROVISIONS OF OUR PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of certain material provisions of our partnership agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K. Other material provisions of our partnership agreement are summarized in other sections of this Description and the documents incorporated by reference herein, including under “Provisions of the Partnership Agreements and Other Arrangements Relating to Cash Distributions.” The summary below is as of the Description Date and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all of the provisions of our partnership agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K. Under Delaware law and the provisions of our partnership agreement, we may also issue additional series or classes of limited partner interests that, as determined by our Board, may have rights that differ from the rights applicable to our common units as described in this Description.
Organization and Duration
Our partnership was formed in March 2014 and has a perpetual existence unless terminated under the terms of our partnership agreement.
Purpose
Our purpose under our partnership agreement is limited to any business activity that is approved by our Board and our general partner and that lawfully may be conducted by a limited partnership organized under Delaware law; provided, however, that, without the prior written consent of our general partner, which consent may be granted or withheld in its sole discretion, we and our subsidiaries do not have any power or authority to solicit, review, respond to or otherwise participate in any request for proposal relating to, or otherwise engage in, or seek to engage in, certain activities or lines of business.
Although our Board and our general partner have the ability to cause us to engage in activities other than the business of acquiring, managing and owning contracted clean energy projects with stable long-term cash flows, our Board and our general partner may, to the fullest extent permitted by law, decline to do so free of any duty or obligation whatsoever to us or our limited partners, including any duty to act in our best interests or in the best interests of our limited partners, other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Our Board and our general partner are authorized in general to perform all acts they determine to be necessary or appropriate to carry out our purposes and to conduct our business.
- 13 -
Capital Contributions
Our limited partners are not obligated to make additional capital contributions, except as described below under “—Limited Liability.” Our general partner is not obligated to make any capital contributions.
Management by Board; Officers
Our general partner has delegated substantially all management power and authority over the business and affairs of the Partnership to our Board established pursuant to our partnership agreement. Our Board consists of seven directors, four of whom are elected by unitholders and three of whom are appointed by our general partner, in its sole discretion. Any decision to be made by our Board will require the approval of at least four directors present and voting at any meeting at which a quorum is present, and four directors constitute a quorum. If our Board is unable to make a decision with respect to certain matters relating to our distribution of cash, our capital expenditures, the acquisition, disposition and use of our assets and purchases and sales of our partnership interests or related derivative securities, NEE Management, which serves as the Manager under the terms of the Management Services Agreement, is authorized to take any action with respect to such matter that is consistent with our operational plan then in effect, which plan is approved annually by our Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our general partner retains the authority to make tax filings and to consent to certain matters of the Partnership. See “—Certain Matters Requiring Consent of the General Partner.”
Our officers and, if any, employees are appointed, retained, terminated and replaced by our Board. However, so long as NEE Management (or another affiliate of NextEra Energy, Inc. (“NEE”)) serves as the Manager under the Management Services Agreement, the Manager, pursuant to the terms of the Management Services Agreement, will designate individuals (i) to serve on the boards of directors or their equivalents of our subsidiaries and (ii) to carry out the functions of principal executive, accounting and financial officers and otherwise to act as our officers and officers of our subsidiaries. Our Board (i) will appoint such individuals designated by the Manager as our officers and, if any, employees and (ii) will cause the boards of directors or their equivalents or the controlling shareholder, member or general partner of our subsidiaries to appoint such individuals designated by the Manager to the applicable roles with respect to the applicable entity, as long as, in each case, the designees are determined by the Manager in good faith to have the appropriate experience, qualifications, skills and such other relevant attributes to carry out such persons’ designated functions.
Annual and Special Meetings
Pursuant to the terms of our partnership agreement, an annual meeting of limited partners for the election of directors and for other properly presented business will be held. Limited partners are not entitled to bring any business before the annual meeting except pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Special meetings may be called (i) by our Board, (ii) by our general partner or (iii) by limited partners owning 20% or more of the outstanding units of the class or classes for which such meeting is proposed (without giving effect to any of the voting limitations described below in “—Voting Rights—Limitations on Voting Rights”). Special meetings may be called by limited partners only for the purposes of removing directors elected by limited partners (“LP Elected Directors”) for cause or removing our general partner.
Voting Rights
Our limited partnership interests include our voting common units, non-voting common units, the Special Voting Units and the Series A preferred units. For purposes of this summary, matters described as requiring the approval of a “unit majority” require the approval of at least a majority of the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding the non-voting common units) and the Special Voting Units, voting together as a single class. Except as related to certain amendments that would have a material adverse effect on the rights or preferences of the non-voting common units in relation to other classes of limited partnership interests, holders of non-voting common units do not have voting rights under our partnership agreement.
- 14 -
Our limited partners may vote at meetings either in person or by proxy. The holders of a majority of the outstanding units (including those deemed owned by our general partner and its affiliates) represented in person or by proxy and that are entitled to vote at such meeting constitutes a quorum at a meeting of the limited partners (including annual and special meetings), unless any action by the limited partners requires approval by a greater percentage of the voting power, in which case the quorum will be the greater percentage. The vote of limited partners holding outstanding units representing a majority of the outstanding units entitled to vote at the meeting (on all matters on which the holders of all units vote together as a single class) or a majority of the outstanding units of each class entitled to vote at the meeting (on all matters on which the holders of each class of units vote separately by class) constitutes the vote of all limited partners, unless a different percentage is required under our partnership agreement, in which case the vote of limited partners holding outstanding units representing at least such different percentage with respect to the outstanding units entitled to vote at such meeting (on all matters on which the holders of all units vote together as a single class) or such different percentage with respect to the outstanding units of each class entitled to vote at such meeting (on all matters on which the holders of each class of units vote separately by class) will be required.
Any action of the limited partners that may be taken at a meeting of the limited partners may be taken, if authorized by our Board, without a meeting if consents in writing describing the action so taken are signed by holders of the number of units that would be necessary to authorize or take that action at a meeting where all limited partners were present and voted.
The following table sets forth a summary of the unitholder vote required for the matters specified below. Other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing, our Board, our general partner and its affiliates, including NEE Equity, have no duty or obligation whatsoever to us or our limited partners, including any duty to act in our best interests or the best interests of our limited partners, in voting units any of them holds or acquires or otherwise.
| Partnership Action | Unitholder Vote Required |
|---|---|
| Issuance of additional units | No approval right. See “—Issuance of Additional Partnership Interests.” |
| Amendment of our partnership agreement | Certain amendments may be made by our Board or our general partner without the approval of the unitholders. Other amendments generally require the approval of a unit majority subject to certain exceptions. See “—Amendment of Our Partnership Agreement,” “—Series A Preferred Units” and “—Non-Voting Common Units” below. |
| Certain matters relating to XPLR OpCo | Any matters relating to XPLR OpCo which require the consent or approval of a majority of the outstanding units of XPLR OpCo, including certain amendments of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, requires the approval of a unit majority. Any other matters requiring approval by a higher percentage of XPLR OpCo common units requires the approval by a corresponding percentage of our unitholders, subject to certain exceptions. Any amendment of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement also requires the approval of our general partner, in its sole discretion. See also “—Series A Preferred Units” below. |
| Merger or conversion of our partnership | Under most circumstances, a merger or conversion of our partnership requires approval of (i) our general partner, in its sole discretion, (ii) our Board, (iii) a majority of the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding non-voting common units and the units owned by our general partner and its affiliates), voting as a separate class, and (iv) a majority of the outstanding Special Voting Units and the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding non-voting common units) owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class. Our general partner must also consent to any merger or conversion of any of our subsidiaries. See “—Merger, Consolidation, Conversion, Sale or Other Disposition of Assets.” |
- 15 -
| Sale of all or substantially all of the assets of our partnership and our subsidiaries | Under most circumstances, a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of our partnership and our subsidiaries requires approval of (i) our general partner, in its sole discretion, (ii) our Board, (iii) a majority of the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding non-voting common units and the units owned by our general partner and its affiliates), voting as a separate class, and (iv) a majority of the outstanding Special Voting Units and the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding non-voting common units) owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class. Pursuant to the right of first refusal agreement among us, XPLR OpCo and NEER, XPLR OpCo granted NEER and its subsidiaries a right of first refusal to acquire all the assets owned or acquired by XPLR OpCo or its subsidiaries. |
|---|---|
| Dissolution of our partnership | Under most circumstances, dissolution of our partnership requires approval of (i) our general partner, in its sole discretion, (ii) our Board, (iii) a majority of the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding the non-voting units and the units owned by our general partner and its affiliates), voting as a separate class, and (iv) a majority of the outstanding Special Voting Units and the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding non-voting common units) owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class. Our general partner must also consent to the dissolution of any of our subsidiaries. See “—Termination and Dissolution.” |
| Continuation of our business upon dissolution | Under certain circumstances, upon the dissolution of our partnership, the limited partners may elect to continue the business of our partnership on the same terms and conditions set forth in our partnership agreement by appointing as a successor general partner a person approved by a unit majority. See “—Termination and Dissolution.” |
| Election of LP Elected Director | A nominee for LP Elected Director will be elected to our Board if, subject to the voting limitations described below, the votes cast for the nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against the nominee’s election. If the number of nominees exceeds the total number of LP Elected Directors to be elected, LP Elected Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast (subject to the voting limitations described below). |
| Removal of LP Elected Director | An LP Elected Director will be removed for cause from our Board if, subject to the voting limitations described below, the votes cast for such LP Elected Director’s removal exceed the votes cast against such LP Elected Director’s removal. |
| Withdrawal of our general partner | No approval right. See “—Withdrawal or Removal of the General Partner.” |
| Removal of our general partner | Approval of not less than 66-2/3% of the outstanding units, voting as a single class, excluding non-voting common units but including units held by our general partner and its affiliates (including the Special Voting Units). Any removal of our general partner is also subject to the approval of a successor general partner by a unit majority. See “—Withdrawal or Removal of the General Partner.” |
| Transfer of the general partner interest | No approval right. See “—Transfer of General Partner Interest.” |
| Transfer of ownership interests in our general partner | No approval right. See “—Transfer of Ownership Interests in the General Partner.” |
Record holders of our outstanding voting units on the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, meetings of the limited partners and to act upon matters for which approvals may be solicited.
Common units held in nominee or street name account will be voted by the broker or other nominee in accordance with the instruction of the beneficial owner unless the arrangement between the beneficial owner and his or her nominee provides otherwise. Any notice, demand, request, report or proxy materials required or permitted to be given or made to record holders of common units eligible to vote under our partnership agreement will be delivered to the record holder by us or by the transfer agent.
- 16 -
Limitations on Voting Rights
Pursuant to our partnership agreement, if any person owns, together with the members of any related group, the power to vote 5% or more of our outstanding units, then such person, together with any related group, is entitled to vote not more than 5% of such outstanding units in the election or removal of LP Elected Directors, and the amount of such units in excess of 5% in voting power is not entitled to vote in the election or removal of LP Elected Directors. In addition, if, after giving effect to the 5% limitation, any person, together with the members of any related group, still has the power to cast votes equal to or greater than 10% of the units present and actually voted on any matter (including the election or removal of LP Elected Directors), an additional cutback will be imposed so that such person, together with the members of any related group, is entitled to cast votes for not more than 9.99% of the units present and actually voted on such matter, and any units held by such person (together with the members of any related group) equal to 10% or greater in voting power will be voted proportionally with all other votes on such matter; provided that, if such person is our general partner or any of its affiliates, such additional cutback applies only to the election or removal of LP Elected Directors.
Series A Preferred Units
Series A preferred units would vote on an as-converted basis with our common units as a single class, so that each outstanding Series A preferred unit would be entitled to one vote for each common unit into which such Series A preferred unit would be convertible at the then-applicable Series A conversion rate on each matter with respect to which each record holder of a common unit is entitled to vote. Series A preferred units, if any, also would have certain class voting rights with respect to amendments that adversely affect their distribution, liquidation or conversion rights, their ranking or certain other protections under our partnership agreement and with respect to certain amendments of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement.
Special Voting Units
NEE Equity will hold the same number of Special Voting Units as the number of common units of XPLR OpCo held by NEE Equity. If the ratio at which common units of XPLR OpCo held by NEE Equity are exchangeable for our common units changes from one-for-one, the number of votes to which the holders of the Special Voting Units are entitled will be adjusted accordingly. Additional limited partner interests having special voting rights could also be issued. See “—Issuance of Additional Partnership Interests” below.
Non-Voting Common Units
Holders of non-voting common units generally do not have voting rights under our partnership agreement. However, non-voting common units have certain class voting rights with respect to amendments that adversely affect their distribution, liquidation, transfer, conversion, voting or economic rights or certain other protections under our partnership agreement. To the extent non-voting common unit holders are entitled to vote, each non-voting common unit is entitled to one vote on such matter.
Proxy Access
Our partnership agreement permits a holder of common units, or a group of up to 20 holders of common units, owning continuously for specified periods of time 10% or more of the aggregate number of outstanding common units and Special Voting Units (an “eligible unitholder”), to nominate candidates for election as LP Elected Directors, provided that such eligible unitholder satisfies the requirements set forth in our partnership agreement. The number of common unitholder nominees eligible to appear in our proxy materials for any annual meeting cannot exceed four. No eligible unitholder, or group of eligible unitholders, is entitled to nominate more than two candidates at any annual meeting.
Limited Liability
Assuming that a limited partner does not participate in the control of our business within the meaning of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the “Delaware Act”) and that the limited partner otherwise acts in conformity with the provisions of the partnership agreement, the limited partner’s liability under the Delaware
- 17 -
Act will be limited, subject to possible exceptions, to the amount of capital that the limited partner is obligated to contribute to us for our limited partner’s limited partner interest plus the limited partner’s share of any undistributed profits and assets. If it were determined, however, that the right, or exercise of the right, by the limited partners as a group:
· to elect or remove directors;
· to remove or replace our general partner;
· to approve some amendments to the partnership agreement; or
· to take other action under the partnership agreement;
constituted “participation in the control” of our business for the purposes of the Delaware Act, then the limited partners could be held personally liable for our obligations under the laws of Delaware, to the same extent as our general partner. This liability would extend to persons who transact business with us who reasonably believe that the limited partner is a general partner. Neither the partnership agreement nor the Delaware Act specifically provides for legal recourse against our general partner if a limited partner were to lose limited liability through any fault of our general partner.
Under the Delaware Act, a limited partnership may not make a distribution to a partner if, after the distribution, all liabilities of the limited partnership, other than liabilities to partners on account of their limited partner interests and liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to specific property of the partnership, would exceed the fair value of the assets of the limited partnership, except that the fair value of property that is subject to a liability for which the recourse of creditors is limited is included in the assets of the limited partnership only to the extent that the fair value of that property exceeds that liability. For the purpose of determining the fair value of the assets of a limited partnership, the Delaware Act provides that the fair value of property subject to liability for which recourse of creditors is limited will be included in the assets of the limited partnership only to the extent that the fair value of that property exceeds the non-recourse liability. The Delaware Act provides that a limited partner who receives a distribution and knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution was in violation of the Delaware Act will be liable to the limited partnership for the amount of the distribution for three years. Under the Delaware Act, a substituted limited partner of a limited partnership is liable for the obligations of his assignor to make contributions to the partnership, except that such person is not obligated for liabilities unknown to him at the time he became a limited partner and that could not be ascertained from the partnership agreement.
Our subsidiaries conduct business in the U.S. and we may have subsidiaries that conduct business in other countries in the future. Maintenance of our limited liability as a limited partner of our operating subsidiaries may require compliance with legal requirements in the jurisdictions in which our operating subsidiaries conduct business, including qualifying our subsidiaries to do business there.
Limitations on the liability of limited partners or members for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in many jurisdictions. If, by virtue of our limited partner interests in XPLR OpCo or otherwise, it were determined that we were conducting business in any state without compliance with the applicable limited partnership statute, or that the right or exercise of the right by the limited partners as a group to remove or replace our general partner, to approve some amendments to the partnership agreement, or to take other action under the partnership agreement constituted “participation in the control” of our business for purposes of the statutes of any relevant jurisdiction, then the limited partners could be held personally liable for our obligations under the law of that jurisdiction to the same extent as our general partner under the circumstances. We will operate in a manner that our general partner considers reasonable and necessary or appropriate to preserve the limited liability of the limited partners.
Issuance of Additional Partnership Interests
Our partnership agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited number of additional partnership interests for the consideration and on the terms and conditions determined by our Board without the approval of any partner of our partnership; provided, however, that we may not issue any additional common units, non-voting common units, Series A preferred units or additional partnership interests that rank pari passu as to distributions with the Series A preferred units (“Series A parity securities”) unless we contribute the cash proceeds or other consideration received
- 18 -
from the issuance of such additional units in exchange for an equivalent number of corresponding XPLR OpCo units.
We have funded acquisitions through the issuance of additional common units. It is possible that we will fund acquisitions through the issuance of additional common units, preferred units or other partnership interests. Holders of any additional common units that we issue will be entitled to share equally with the then-existing holders of common units in our distributions of available cash. In addition, our issuance of additional common units, preferred units or other partnership interests may dilute the value of the interests of the then-existing holders of common units in our net assets.
Under Delaware law and the provisions of our partnership agreement, we may also issue partnership interests that, as determined by our Board, may have special voting or economic rights to which our common units are not entitled. Our partnership agreement does not prohibit the issuance by our subsidiaries of equity interests, which may effectively rank senior to our common units.
Conversion of Non-Voting Common Units
Each holder of non-voting common units will have the right, but not the obligation, to convert all or a portion of its non-voting common units into one common unit for each non-voting common unit being converted, subject to certain limitations and adjustments. However, certain holders shall not have the right to convert any non-voting common units to the extent that, after giving effect to the conversion, the holder (together with its affiliates and others acting as a group) would beneficially own in excess of 19.8% of the number of common units outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion. Further, each non-voting common unit held by certain qualified holders under the partnership agreement shall automatically convert into one common unit (subject to certain adjustments) immediately upon its transfer to any non-affiliate of such qualified holder.
Amendment of Our Partnership Agreement
General
Amendments to our partnership agreement may be proposed only by our Board or, in limited circumstances, our general partner. However, other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing, neither our Board nor our general partner have any duty or obligation to propose any amendment and our Board and our general partner may decline to do so free of any duty or obligation whatsoever to us or our limited partners, including any duty to act in our best interests or the best interests of the limited partners. In order to adopt a proposed amendment, other than the amendments described below under “—Amendments that Do Not Require Unitholder Approval,” our Board or our general partner, as applicable, is required to seek approval of such amendment by the limited partners. Except as described below, an amendment that requires approval by the limited partners must be approved by a unit majority.
Prohibited Amendments
No amendment may be made that would:
· enlarge the obligations of any limited partner without its consent, unless the amendment is deemed to have occurred as a result of an amendment approved by at least a majority of the type or class of limited partner interests so affected; or
· enlarge the obligations of, restrict in any way any action by or rights of, or reduce in any way the amounts distributable, reimbursable or otherwise payable by us to our general partner or any of its affiliates without our general partner’s consent, which consent may be given or withheld at its option.
The provisions of our partnership agreement preventing these types of amendments can be amended upon the approval of the holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units.
- 19 -
Amendments Requiring Dual Class Voting
Any amendment to our partnership agreement with respect to the provisions relating to the distributions of available cash, the management and operation of our business, our general partner’s authority to amend our partnership agreement (as described below), our Board’s authority to amend our partnership agreement to prevent consolidation (as described below), annual meetings and special meetings, quorum and voting, limitations on voting power, and proxy access, or any defined terms used in those provisions, will require the approval of the holders of (i) at least a majority of the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding non-voting common units and excluding common units owned by our general partner and its affiliates), voting as a separate class, and (ii) at least a majority of the outstanding Special Voting Units and the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding non-voting common units) owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class.
Amendments that Do Not Require Unitholder Approval
Our partnership agreement provides that our Board (instead of our general partner) generally may make amendments to our partnership agreement without the approval of any partner to reflect:
· a change in our name, the location of our principal office, our registered agent or our registered office;
· the admission, substitution, withdrawal or removal of partners in accordance with our partnership agreement;
· a change that our Board determines to be necessary or appropriate to qualify or continue our qualification as a limited partnership or a partnership in which the limited partners have limited liability under the laws of any state or to ensure that our subsidiaries will not be taxable as corporations or otherwise taxed as entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
· any amendment that is necessary, in the opinion of our counsel, to prevent us, our general partner or their respective directors, officers, agents or trustees from, in any manner, being subjected to the provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“Investment Company Act”), the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (“Advisers Act”), or “plan asset” regulations adopted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), regardless of whether such are substantially similar to plan asset regulations currently applied or proposed by the U.S. Department of Labor;
· any amendment that our Board determines to be necessary or appropriate for the authorization or issuance of additional partnership interests or in connection with splits or combinations of our partnership interests in accordance with our partnership agreement;
· any amendment expressly permitted in our partnership agreement to be made by our Board acting alone;
· any amendment effected, necessitated or contemplated by a merger agreement that has been approved under the terms of our partnership agreement;
· any amendment that our Board determines to be necessary or appropriate to reflect and account for the formation by us of, or our investment in, any corporation, partnership or other entity, in connection with our conduct of activities permitted by our partnership agreement;
· any change in our fiscal year or taxable year and any other changes that our Board determines to be necessary or appropriate as a result of such change;
· certain conversions into, mergers with or conveyances to another limited liability entity;
· a modification of the qualification of eligible unitholders for nominating directors with respect to any annual meeting of limited partners; or
· any other amendments substantially similar to any of the matters described in the clauses above.
In addition, our Board may make amendments to our partnership agreement without the approval of any limited partner if our Board determines that those amendments:
· do not adversely affect in any material respect the limited partners considered as a whole or any particular class of partnership interests as compared to other classes of partnership interests;
- 20 -
· are necessary or appropriate to satisfy any requirements, conditions or guidelines contained in any opinion, directive, order, ruling or regulation of any federal or state agency or judicial authority or contained in any federal or state statute;
· are necessary or appropriate to facilitate the trading of limited partner interests or to comply with any rule, regulation, guideline or requirement of any securities exchange on which the limited partner interests are or will be listed or admitted to trading;
· are necessary or appropriate for any action taken by our Board relating to splits or combinations of units under the provisions of our partnership agreement; or
· are required to effect the intent of the provisions of our partnership agreement or are otherwise contemplated by our partnership agreement.
Further, our Board, without the approval of any partner of our partnership, may amend any provision of our partnership agreement in such manner as our Board determines to be necessary or appropriate to prevent the consolidation of the financial results of our partnership and our subsidiaries with those of NEE and its subsidiaries (other than our partnership and our subsidiaries) under United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), so long as such amendment is not materially adverse to us or our limited partners.
Our general partner, without the approval of any other partner of our partnership, may, in its sole discretion, amend any provision of our partnership agreement in connection with such changes to the ownership structure of XPLR OpCo’s common units and the Special Voting Units held by our general partner or its affiliates as may be required to avoid adverse tax consequences resulting from changes to tax laws, so long as such amendment is not materially adverse to us or our limited partners.
No Opinion of Counsel
For amendments of the type not requiring unitholder approval, neither our Board nor our general partner will be required to obtain an opinion of counsel to the effect that an amendment will not affect the limited liability of any limited partner under Delaware law. No other amendments to our partnership agreement will become effective without the approval of holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units voting as a single class unless we first obtain such an opinion.
Amendment Affecting a Class of Partnership Interest
Without limitation of our Board’s or our general partner’s authority to adopt amendments without the approval of any partner of our partnership as described above, any amendment that would have a material adverse effect on the rights or preferences of any class of partnership interests (including non-voting common units) in relation to other classes of partnership interests will require the approval of at least a majority of the class of partnership interests so affected.
Amendment Changing Percentage of Units Required to Take Actions
Any amendment that would reduce the percentage of units required to take any action, other than to remove our general partner or call a meeting of limited partners, must be approved by the written consent or affirmative vote of limited partners (excluding non-voting common units) whose aggregate outstanding units constitute not less than the percentage sought to be reduced. Any amendment that would increase the percentage of units required to remove our general partner must be approved by the written consent or affirmative vote of limited partners whose aggregate outstanding units constitute not less than 90% of the outstanding units (excluding non-voting common units). Any amendment that would increase the percentage of units required to call a meeting of limited partners must be approved by the written consent or affirmative vote of limited partners whose aggregate outstanding units constitute at least a majority of the outstanding units (excluding non-voting common units).
Amendment of the IDR Fee Provisions
Any amendment to the provisions relating to the IDR Fee (as defined in the Management Services Agreement) contained in the Management Services Agreement that would materially adversely affect holders of our common units requires the approval of a unit majority.
- 21 -
Amendment of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement
Any amendment of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement that requires approval by holders of at least a majority of the outstanding units of XPLR OpCo requires the approval of a unit majority. Any other amendment that requires approval by holders of at least 90% of the XPLR OpCo’s common units requires the approval by holders of at least 90% of our outstanding units.
Merger, Consolidation, Conversion, Sale or Other Disposition of Assets
A merger, consolidation or conversion involving us requires the prior consent of our general partner and approval of our Board. However, our general partner and our Board have no duty or obligation to consent to or approve any merger, consolidation or conversion and may decline to do so free of any duty or obligation whatsoever to us or our limited partners, including any duty to act in our best interests or in the best interests of our limited partners. The merger agreement or plan of conversion also must be approved by the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of (i) a majority of the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding the non-voting common units and the units owned by our general partner and its affiliates), voting as a separate class, and (ii) a majority of the outstanding Special Voting Units and the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding the non-voting common units) owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class, unless such merger agreement or plan of conversion effects an amendment to our partnership agreement that would require for its approval the vote or consent of a greater percentage of the outstanding units or of any class of limited partners, in which case such greater percentage will be required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, without the approval of limited partners, we or any of our subsidiaries may convert into a new limited liability entity, or merge into or convey all of our assets to, a newly formed limited liability entity if the sole purpose of that conversion, merger or conveyance is to effect a mere change in our legal form into another limited liability entity, we have received an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability and our Board determines that the governing instruments of the new entity provide the limited partners and our general partner with substantially the same rights and obligations as contained in our partnership agreement. Additionally, without the approval of limited partners, we may merge with another limited liability entity if we are the surviving entity in the transaction, our general partner has received an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability, the transaction would not result in an amendment to our partnership agreement requiring unitholder approval, each of our units will be an identical unit of our partnership following the transaction, and the partnership interests to be issued by us in such merger do not exceed 20% of our outstanding partnership interests immediately prior to the transaction. Our general partner must also consent to any merger or conversion of any of our subsidiaries.
Under our partnership agreement, we may not sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets in a single transaction or a series of related transactions without the consent of our general partner and the approval of (i) a majority of the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding the non-voting common units and excluding the units owned by our general partner and its affiliates), voting as a separate class, and (ii) a majority of the outstanding Special Voting Units and the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding the non-voting common units) owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class. We may, however, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in all or substantially all of our assets without such approval. We may also sell any or all of our assets under a foreclosure of, or other realization upon, those encumbrances without that approval.
Termination and Dissolution
We will continue as a limited partnership until dissolved and terminated under our partnership agreement. We will dissolve upon:
· the election by our Board to dissolve our partnership, if consented to by our general partner and approved by (i) a majority of the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding the non-voting common units and excluding the units owned by our general partner and its affiliates), voting as a separate class, and (ii) a majority of the outstanding Special Voting Units and the outstanding common units (including Series A preferred
- 22 -
units, voting as if converted into common units, but excluding non-voting common units) owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class;
· there being no limited partners, unless we are continued without dissolution in accordance with applicable Delaware law;
· the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of our partnership; or
· the withdrawal or removal of our general partner or any other event that results in its ceasing to be our general partner, other than by reason of a transfer of its general partner interest in accordance with our partnership agreement or withdrawal or removal followed by approval and admission of a successor.
Upon a dissolution under the last clause above, a unit majority may also elect, within specific time limitations, to continue our business on the same terms and conditions described in our partnership agreement by appointing as a successor general partner an entity approved by a unit majority, subject to our receipt of an opinion of counsel to the effect that the action would not result in the loss of limited liability of any limited partner. Our general partner must also consent to the dissolution of any of our subsidiaries.
Certain Matters Requiring Consent of the General Partner
Our general partner’s consent, which may be granted or withheld in its sole discretion, is required for the following actions:
· a sale of all or substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets;
· a merger, consolidation or conversion involving us or any of our subsidiaries;
· dissolution of us or any of our subsidiaries;
· any amendment of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement;
· any direct or indirect transfer of all or any portion of the general partner interest in XPLR OpCo to any person;
· our participation in certain activities or lines of business; and
· the granting of certain information rights to our limited partners.
Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds
Upon our dissolution, unless we are continued as a new limited partnership, the liquidator authorized to wind up our affairs will, acting with all of the powers of our general partner and our Board that are necessary or appropriate to, liquidate our assets and apply the proceeds of the liquidation first to discharge any outstanding liabilities, next to holders of any Series A preferred units to satisfy the applicable liquidation preference, and finally to our unitholders on a pro rata basis. The liquidator may defer liquidation or distribution of our assets for a reasonable period of time or distribute assets to partners in kind if it determines that a sale would be impractical or would cause undue loss to our partners.
Duties of the General Partner and our Board
The Delaware Act provides that Delaware limited partnerships may, in their partnership agreements, expand, restrict or eliminate the fiduciary duties otherwise owed by a general partner or board of directors to limited partners and the partnership. The duties described below have not materially changed and are summarized because our Board is also subject to the contractual standards described below.
Our partnership agreement contains various provisions replacing the fiduciary duties that would otherwise be owed by our general partner, our Board, any director, any committee of our Board or any officer with contractual standards governing the duties of such persons and the methods of resolving conflicts of interest. We believe this is appropriate and necessary because our general partner is owned by NEE, and to the extent any members of our Board are also officers or directors of NEE, such officers or directors have fiduciary duties to NEE. Without these provisions, our general partner and such officers’ or directors’ ability to make decisions involving conflicts of interests would be unduly restricted. These provisions represent a possible detriment to the limited partners, however, because they restrict the remedies available to limited partners for actions that, without those provisions, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
- 23 -
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that waive or consent to conduct by our general partner and its affiliates, our Board, or any director or any committee of our Board that might otherwise raise issues as to compliance with fiduciary duties or applicable law. For example, our partnership agreement provides that when our general partner is acting in its capacity as our general partner, as opposed to in its individual capacity, and when our Board or any director or committee of our Board makes a determination or takes or declines to take any other action, it must act in “good faith,” meaning that it subjectively believed that the decision was in our best interests, and will not be subject to any other standard under applicable law, other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In addition, when our general partner is acting in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner, it may act free of any duty or obligation whatsoever to us or our limited partners, other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
Our partnership agreement generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions of conflicts of interest not approved by the public unitholders or the conflicts committee of our Board must be determined by our Board to be:
· on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
· “fair and reasonable” to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships between the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us.
If our Board determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the bullet points above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, our Board acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or our partnership challenging such determination, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption. These standards reduce the obligations to which our general partner and our directors would otherwise be held under applicable Delaware law.
Rights and remedies of limited partners
The Delaware Act generally provides that a limited partner may institute legal action on behalf of the partnership to recover damages from a third party where a general partner or board of directors has wrongfully refused to institute the action or where an effort to cause a general partner or board of directors to do so is not likely to succeed. These actions include actions against a general partner or board of directors for breach of its contractual duties under the partnership agreement.
Under our partnership agreement, we must indemnify our general partner, its affiliates and their managers, officers and directors (including our directors), to the fullest extent permitted by law, against liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by such indemnitees. We must provide this indemnification unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that these persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct. We also must provide this indemnification for criminal proceedings unless such indemnitees acted with knowledge that their conduct was unlawful. Thus, our general partner and our directors could be indemnified for their negligent acts if they meet the requirements set forth above. See “—Indemnification” above regarding the duties of our general partner.
A transferee of or other person acquiring a unit will be deemed to have agreed to be bound by the provisions in our partnership agreement, including the provisions described above. See “—Transfer of Common Units.” The failure of a limited partner to sign our partnership agreement does not render our partnership agreement unenforceable against that person.
Withdrawal or Removal of the General Partner
Our general partner will be deemed to have withdrawn from our partnership upon the occurrence of, among others, any of the following events:
- 24 -
· Voluntary withdrawal. Our partnership agreement permits our general partner to voluntarily withdraw by giving at least 90 days’ advance notice to our unitholders, and such withdrawal will take effect on the date specified in such notice.
· Transfer of all of our general partner’s general partner interest.
· Removal by limited partners. Our general partner may not be removed unless (i) the removal is approved by the vote of the holders of not less than 66-2/3% of the outstanding units (including units held by our general partner and its affiliates, but excluding non-voting common units), voting together as a single class, and (ii) we receive an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability. Any removal of our general partner is also subject to the election of a successor general partner by a unit majority. The ownership of more than 33 1/3% of the outstanding units by NEE and its affiliates would give them the practical ability to prevent our general partner’s removal.
Prior to the effective date of the voluntary withdrawal or the removal of our general partner, a unit majority may elect a successor general partner. If a successor is not elected, or is elected but an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability cannot be obtained, we will be dissolved, wound up and liquidated, unless within a specified period after that withdrawal, a unit majority agrees to continue our business by appointing a successor general partner. See “—Termination and Dissolution.”
Transfer of General Partner Interest
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest without the consent of the limited partners if certain conditions are met, including (i) the transferee assumes the rights and duties of our general partner and agrees to be bound by the provisions of our partnership agreement, (ii) our partnership receives an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability matters and (iii) the transferee agrees to purchase all or the appropriate portion of the partnership or membership interest of our general partner as the general partner or managing member of each of our subsidiaries.
In general, our general partner and its affiliates may, at any time, transfer common units to one or more persons without unitholder approval.
Transfer of Ownership Interests in the General Partner
At any time, NEE and its affiliates may sell or transfer all or part of their direct or indirect interest in our general partner without the approval of our unitholders.
Status as Limited Partner
By transfer of common units in accordance with our partnership agreement, each transferee of common units will be admitted as a limited partner with respect to our common units transferred when such transfer and admission is reflected in our register. Except as described under “—Limited Liability,” our common units will be fully paid, and unitholders will not be required to make additional contributions.
Indemnification
In most circumstances, we will indemnify the following persons, to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and against all losses, claims, damages or similar events:
· our general partner;
· any departing general partner;
· any person who is or was an affiliate of a general partner or any departing general partner;
· any person who is or was a director (including each LP Elected Director and each GP Appointed Director), officer, managing member, manager, general partner, fiduciary or trustee of (i) our partnership, our subsidiaries, our general partner or any departing general partner or (ii) any affiliate of our partnership, our subsidiaries, our general partner or any departing general partner;
- 25 -
· any person who is or was serving as director, officer, managing member, manager, general partner, fiduciary or trustee of another person owing certain duties to us or any of our subsidiaries at the request of our Board, our general partner or any departing general partner or any of their affiliates; and
· any person designated by our Board or our general partner.
Any indemnification under these provisions will only be out of our assets. Our general partner will not be personally liable for, or have any obligation to contribute or lend funds or assets to us to enable us to effectuate, indemnification. An affiliate of our general partner has purchased insurance against liabilities asserted against and expenses incurred by our general partner’s directors and executive officers, as well as our directors and executive officers, regardless of whether we would have the power to indemnify such persons against such liabilities under our partnership agreement.
Reimbursement of Expenses
Our partnership agreement requires us to reimburse our general partner for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or payments it makes on our behalf and all other expenses allocable to us or otherwise incurred by our general partner in connection with its service as our general partner. The general partner is entitled to determine in good faith the expenses that are allocable to us.
Tax Matters
We have elected to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our general partner determines whether we will make any other tax elections permitted by federal, state, local or foreign tax law.
Our general partner has exclusive authority for the making of tax filings, or rendering of periodic or other tax reports to governmental or other agencies having jurisdiction over our business or assets.
Books and Reports
We are required to keep appropriate books of our business at our principal offices. The books will be maintained for financial reporting purposes on an accrual basis. For tax and fiscal reporting purposes, our fiscal year is the calendar year.
We will mail or make available to record holders of common units, within 105 days after the close of each fiscal year, an annual report containing audited financial statements and a report on those financial statements by our independent public accountants. Except for our fourth quarter, we will also mail or make available summary financial information within 50 days after the close of each quarter.
Right to Inspect Our Books and Records
Our partnership agreement provides that a limited partner can, for a purpose reasonably related to his or her interest as a limited partner, upon reasonable written demand stating the purpose of such demand and at his or her own expense, have furnished to him or her:
· a current list of the name and last known address of each record holder;
· copies of our partnership agreement and our certificate of limited partnership and all amendments thereto; and
· certain information regarding the status of our business and financial condition.
Our Board may, and intends to, keep confidential from the limited partners, trade secrets or other information the disclosure of which our Board determines is not in our best interests or that we are required by law or by agreements with third parties to keep confidential. Any disclosure of such information to the limited partners requires the prior written consent of our general partner. Our partnership agreement limits the right to information that a limited partner would otherwise have under Delaware law.
- 26 -
Dissenters’ Rights of Appraisal
The unitholders are not entitled to dissenters’ rights of appraisal under our partnership agreement or applicable Delaware law in the event of a conversion, merger or consolidation, a sale of substantially all of our assets or any other transaction or event.
MATERIAL PROVISIONS OF THE XPLR OPCO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of certain material provisions of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement. The summary below is as of the Description Date and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all of the provisions of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.
We summarize the provisions of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement regarding distributions of available cash elsewhere in this Description. See “Provisions of the Partnership Agreements and Other Arrangements Relating to Cash Distributions.”
Organization and Duration
XPLR OpCo was formed in March 2014 and has a perpetual existence unless terminated under the terms of its partnership agreement.
Purpose
XPLR OpCo’s purpose under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement is limited to any business activity that is approved by its general partner and that lawfully may be conducted by a limited partnership organized under Delaware law; provided, however, that, without the prior written consent of our general partner, which consent may be granted or withheld in its sole discretion, XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries do not have any power or authority to solicit, review, respond to or otherwise participate in any request for proposal relating to, or otherwise engage in, or seek to engage in, certain activities or lines of business.
Although XPLR OpCo GP has the ability to cause it and its subsidiaries to engage in activities other than the business of acquiring, managing and owning contracted clean energy projects with stable long-term cash flows, XPLR OpCo GP may decline to do so free of any duty or obligation whatsoever to XPLR OpCo or the limited partners, including any duty to act in the best interests of XPLR OpCo or the limited partners, other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing. XPLR OpCo GP is authorized in general to perform all acts it determines to be necessary or appropriate to carry out its purposes and to conduct its business. Since we own all of the equity interests of XPLR OpCo GP, decisions made by XPLR OpCo GP under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement are ultimately made at the direction of our Board or, in certain limited circumstances, our general partner.
Capital Contributions
Unitholders are not obligated under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement to make additional capital contributions with respect to the units in XPLR OpCo that they own. XPLR OpCo GP is not obligated under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement to make any capital contributions.
Meetings; Voting Rights
Record holders of common units on the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, meetings of XPLR OpCo’s limited partners and to act upon matters for which approvals may be solicited. For purposes of this summary, matters described as requiring the approval of a “unit majority” of XPLR OpCo require the approval of at least a majority of the outstanding XPLR OpCo common units (including OpCo Series A preferred units, voting as if converted into XPLR OpCo common units, but excluding XPLR OpCo non-voting common units).
We do not anticipate that any meeting of XPLR OpCo unitholders will be called in the foreseeable future. Any action that is required or permitted to be taken by the unitholders may be taken at a meeting of the unitholders or without a meeting if consents in writing describing the action so taken are signed by holders of the number of
- 27 -
units that would be necessary to authorize or take that action at a meeting where all limited partners were present and voted. Meetings of the unitholders may be called by XPLR OpCo GP. Eligible unitholders may vote either in person or by proxy at meetings. The holders of a majority of the outstanding units of the class or classes for which a meeting has been called and which are entitled to vote at such meeting, represented in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum unless any action by the unitholders requires approval by holders of a greater percentage of the units, in which case the quorum will be the greater percentage.
Generally, each record holder of a unit is entitled to a number of votes on any matter presented to the holders of units for a vote that is equal to the holder’s percentage interest in XPLR OpCo units, although additional limited partner interests having special voting rights could be issued. See “—Issuance of Additional Partnership Interests.” Further, except as related to certain amendments that would have a material adverse effect on the rights or preferences of the XPLR OpCo non-voting common units in relation to other classes of limited partnership interests, holders of XPLR OpCo non-voting common units generally do not have voting rights under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement.
Any notice, demand, request, report or proxy materials required or permitted to be given or made to record holders of common units under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement will be delivered to the record holder by XPLR OpCo or by the transfer agent.
Issuance of Additional Partnership Interests
The XPLR OpCo partnership agreement authorizes XPLR OpCo to issue an unlimited number of additional partnership interests for the consideration and on the terms and conditions determined by its general partner without the approval of holders of XPLR OpCo’s common units.
Under Delaware law and the provisions of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, XPLR OpCo may also issue additional series or classes of limited partner interests that may have rights or preferences which differ from the terms of XPLR OpCo’s common units. The XPLR OpCo partnership agreement does not prohibit the issuance by its subsidiaries of equity interests, which may effectively rank senior to XPLR OpCo common units.
At any time when XPLR issues additional common units, non-voting common units, Series A preferred units or Series A parity securities, XPLR OpCo will issue an equivalent number of corresponding units to XPLR. In addition, at any time when XPLR issues other classes or series of partnership interests, we expect that XPLR OpCo will issue an equivalent number of such other classes or series of partnership interests to XPLR. As a result, if XPLR issues additional securities to fund acquisitions or for other purposes, we expect that XPLR OpCo will be required to issue a like amount of additional securities to XPLR, which may dilute the value of the interests of the then-existing holders of XPLR OpCo’s common units in XPLR OpCo’s net assets.
OpCo Class B Units
XPLR OpCo previously issued the OpCo Class B units, none of which are currently outstanding. See “Provisions of the Partnership Agreements and Other Arrangements Relating to Cash Distributions.”
OpCo Class P Units
On December 27, 2023, XPLR OpCo issued the OpCo Class P Units to NEE Equity. The OpCo Class P Units provide that XPLR OpCo GP may, if approved by the affirmative vote or written consent of the limited partners holding OpCo Class P Units (each, a “Class P Limited Partner”) holding at least a majority of the outstanding OpCo Class P Units (“Class P Majority Approval”), allocate, for any taxable period, up to 100% of any items of income or gain (or any portion thereof) resulting from any Class P Transaction (as defined below) in respect of the OpCo Class P Units to the Class P Limited Partners, pro rata. A “Class P Transaction” means any (a) sale, transfer, or other disposition of assets of XPLR OpCo or its subsidiaries that (1) are or previously have been held directly or indirectly by an entity that is a first-tier holding company for a convertible equity portfolio financing or (2) are described on an annex to the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, which annex may be amended at any time and from time to time by XPLR OpCo GP, but only if approved by Class P Majority Approval, or (b) extinguishment or other termination of any financial instruments or liabilities of XPLR OpCo or its subsidiaries. In
- 28 -
any taxable period that begins at least five years after the taxable period for which any allocations are made pursuant to the foregoing (a “Class P Offset Period”), the Class P Limited Partners may, but only if approved by, and in such time and such manner as determined by, Class P Majority Approval, receive a special allocation of up to 100% (or such lesser portion as may be determined by Class P Majority Approval) of any items of loss or deduction in respect of the OpCo Class P Units until the cumulative amount allocated pursuant to this sentence is equal to the aggregate amount of income or gain allocated to Class P Limited Partners pursuant to the foregoing in such earlier tax period. The Class P Limited Partners shall deliver notice to XPLR OpCo GP of any Class P Majority Approval of any such special allocation of items of loss or deduction in respect of the OpCo Class P Units pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence during any Class P Offset Period within 150 days after the close of the applicable tax year to which such special allocation relates.
NEE Equity, as holder of the OpCo Class P Units, is not entitled to receive any distributions of available cash or any other distributions of assets or property of XPLR OpCo with respect to such units, other than in connection with a liquidation of XPLR OpCo as specified in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement. Unless approved by XPLR OpCo GP and NEE Equity, XPLR OpCo is not authorized to issue additional OpCo Class P Units. The OpCo Class P Units are non-transferable, other than to any affiliate of NEE Equity. The OpCo Class P Units have no XPLR OpCo voting rights other than customary limited voting rights as specified in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement. In the event of a liquidation of XPLR OpCo, the sole right of the holder of the OpCo Class P Units would be to receive payment as specified in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement.
Transfer of Common Units
By transfer of common units in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, each transferee of common units will be admitted as a limited partner with respect to XPLR OpCo common units transferred when such transfer or admission is reflected in XPLR OpCo’s register and such limited partner becomes the record holder of XPLR OpCo common units so transferred. Each transferee:
· will become bound and will be deemed to have agreed to be bound by the terms of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement;
· will be deemed to represent that the transferee has the capacity, power and authority to enter into the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement; and
· will be deemed to make any consents, acknowledgements or waivers contained in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement.
XPLR OpCo is entitled to treat the nominee holder of a common unit as the absolute owner in the event such nominee is the record holder of such common unit. In that case, the beneficial holder’s rights are limited solely to those that it has against the nominee holder as a result of any agreement between the beneficial owner and the nominee holder.
Common units are securities and are transferable according to the laws governing transfer of securities. Until a common unit has been transferred on XPLR OpCo’s register, XPLR OpCo and the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the unit as the absolute owner for all purposes, except as otherwise required by law or stock exchange regulations.
Amendment of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement
General
Amendments to the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement may be proposed only by XPLR Infrastructure Partners GP, Inc. (“XPLR GP”), the general partner of XPLR. However, other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing, XPLR GP has no duty or obligation to propose any amendment and may decline to do so free of any duty or obligation whatsoever to XPLR OpCo or the limited partners, including any duty to act in the best interests of XPLR OpCo or the limited partners. In order to adopt a proposed amendment, other than the amendments described below, XPLR OpCo GP is required to seek written approval of the holders of the number of units and other interests, if any, required to approve the amendment or call a meeting of the limited partners to
- 29 -
consider and vote upon the proposed amendment. Except as described below, an amendment must be approved by a unit majority.
Prohibited Amendments
No amendment may be made that would:
· enlarge the obligations of any limited partner without its consent, unless the amendment is deemed to have occurred as a result of an amendment approved by at least a majority of the type or class of limited partner interests so affected; or
· enlarge the obligations of, restrict in any way any action by or rights of, or reduce in any way the amounts distributable, reimbursable or otherwise payable by XPLR OpCo to XPLR OpCo GP or any of its affiliates without XPLR OpCo GP’s consent, which consent may be given or withheld at its option.
The provisions of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement preventing these types of amendments can be amended upon the approval of the holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units voting together as a single class (including units owned by XPLR OpCo GP and its affiliates).
No Unitholder Approval
XPLR GP may generally make amendments to the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement without the approval of any limited partner to reflect:
· a change in XPLR OpCo’s name, the location of XPLR OpCo’s principal office, its registered agent or its registered office;
· the admission, substitution, withdrawal or removal of partners in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement;
· a change that XPLR GP determines to be necessary or appropriate to qualify or continue XPLR OpCo’s qualification as a limited partnership or a partnership in which the limited partners have limited liability under the laws of any state or to ensure that none of XPLR OpCo’s subsidiaries will be treated as an association taxable as a corporation or otherwise taxed as an entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
· any amendment that is necessary, in the opinion of XPLR OpCo’s counsel, to prevent XPLR OpCo or its general partner or XPLR GP or its directors, officers, agents or trustees from, in any manner, being subjected to the provisions of the Investment Company Act, the Advisers Act, or “plan asset” regulations adopted under ERISA regardless of whether such are substantially similar to plan asset regulations currently applied or proposed by the U.S. Department of Labor;
· any amendment that XPLR GP determines to be necessary or appropriate for the authorization or issuance of additional partnership interests or in connection with splits or combinations of XPLR OpCo’s partnership interests in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement;
· any amendment expressly permitted in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement to be made by XPLR GP acting alone;
· any amendment effected, necessitated or contemplated by a merger agreement that has been approved under the terms of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement;
· any amendment that XPLR GP determines to be necessary or appropriate to reflect and account for the formation by XPLR OpCo of, or XPLR OpCo’s investment in, any corporation, partnership or other entity, in connection with XPLR OpCo’s conduct of activities permitted by its partnership agreement;
· any change in XPLR OpCo’s fiscal year or taxable year and any other changes that XPLR GP determines to be necessary or appropriate as a result of such change;
· any conversions into, mergers with or conveyances to another limited liability entity that is newly formed and has no assets, liabilities or operations at the time of the conversion, merger or conveyance other than those it receives by way of the conversion, merger or conveyance; or
· any other amendments substantially similar to any of the matters described in the clauses above.
- 30 -
In addition, XPLR GP may make amendments to the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement without the approval of any limited partner if XPLR GP determines that those amendments:
· do not adversely affect in any material respect the limited partners considered as a whole or any particular class of partnership interests as compared to other classes of partnership interests;
· are necessary or appropriate to satisfy any requirements, conditions or guidelines contained in any opinion, directive, order, ruling or regulation of any federal or state agency or judicial authority or contained in any federal or state statute; or
· are required to effect the intent of the provisions of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement or are otherwise contemplated by the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement.
Further, XPLR GP, without the approval of any partner of XPLR OpCo, may amend any provision of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement in such manner as XPLR’s board of directors determines to be necessary or appropriate to prevent the consolidation of the financial results of XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries with those of NEE and its subsidiaries (other than with us and our subsidiaries) under U.S. GAAP, so long as such amendment is not materially adverse to XPLR OpCo or any class of XPLR OpCo’s unitholders.
XPLR GP, without the approval of any other partner of XPLR OpCo, may, in its sole discretion, amend any provision of the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement in connection with such changes to the ownership structure of XPLR OpCo’s common units held by XPLR OpCo GP or its affiliates as may be required to avoid adverse tax consequences resulting from changes to tax laws, so long as such amendment is not materially adverse to XPLR OpCo or any class of XPLR OpCo’s unitholders.
Opinion of Counsel and Unitholder Approval
For amendments of the type not requiring unitholder approval, XPLR OpCo will not be required to obtain an opinion of counsel to the effect that an amendment will not affect the limited liability of any limited partner under Delaware law. No other amendments to the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement will become effective without the approval of holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units voting as a single class unless XPLR OpCo first obtains such an opinion.
In addition to the above restrictions, any amendment that would have a material adverse effect on the rights or preferences of any type or class of partnership interests in relation to other classes of partnership interests requires the approval of at least a majority of the type or class of partnership interests so affected. Any amendment that would reduce the percentage of units required to take any action, other than to remove XPLR OpCo GP or call a meeting of unitholders, must be approved by the affirmative vote of limited partners whose aggregate outstanding units (excluding non-voting common units) constitute not less than the percentage sought to be reduced. Any amendment that would increase the percentage of units required to remove XPLR OpCo GP must be approved by the affirmative vote of limited partners whose aggregate outstanding units (excluding non-voting common units) constitute not less than 90% of the outstanding units (excluding non-voting common units). Any amendment that would increase the percentage of units required to call a meeting of unitholders must be approved by the affirmative vote of limited partners whose aggregate outstanding units constitute at least a majority of the outstanding units (excluding non-voting common units).
Merger, Consolidation, Conversion, Sale or Other Disposition of Assets
A merger, consolidation or conversion of XPLR OpCo requires the prior consent of our general partner, which consent may be granted or withheld in its sole discretion, and the prior consent of XPLR OpCo GP. However, our general partner and XPLR OpCo GP have no duty or obligation to consent to any merger, consolidation or conversion and may decline to do so free of any duty or obligation whatsoever to XPLR OpCo or the limited partners, including any duty to act in the best interests of XPLR OpCo or the limited partners.
In addition, the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement generally prohibits XPLR OpCo GP without the prior approval of XPLR GP and the holders of a unit majority, from causing XPLR OpCo to, among other things, sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of XPLR OpCo’s assets in a single transaction or a series of related transactions. The general partner may, however, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in
- 31 -
all or substantially all of XPLR OpCo’s assets without such approval. XPLR OpCo GP may also sell any or all of XPLR OpCo’s assets under a foreclosure or other realization upon those encumbrances without that approval. Finally, XPLR GP and XPLR OpCo GP may consummate any merger or consolidation of XPLR OpCo with another limited liability entity without the prior approval of XPLR OpCo’s unitholders if XPLR OpCo is the surviving entity in the transaction, XPLR OpCo GP has received an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability, the transaction would not result in an amendment to the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement requiring unitholder approval, each of XPLR OpCo’s units will be an identical unit of the partnership following the transaction, and the partnership interests to be issued by XPLR OpCo in such merger do not exceed 20% of XPLR OpCo’s outstanding partnership interests immediately prior to the transaction.
If the conditions specified in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement are satisfied, our general partner and XPLR OpCo GP may convert XPLR OpCo or any of its subsidiaries into a new limited liability entity or merge XPLR OpCo or any of its subsidiaries into, or convey all of XPLR OpCo’s assets to, a newly formed entity if the sole purpose of that conversion, merger or conveyance is to effect a mere change in XPLR OpCo’s legal form into another limited liability entity, the general partner of XPLR OpCo has received an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability and XPLR OpCo GP determines that the governing instruments of the new entity provide the limited partners and XPLR OpCo GP with the same rights and obligations as contained in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement. The unitholders are not entitled to dissenters’ rights of appraisal under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement or applicable Delaware law in the event of a conversion, merger or consolidation, a sale of substantially all of XPLR OpCo’s assets or any other similar transaction or event.
Termination and Dissolution
XPLR OpCo will continue as a limited partnership until dissolved and terminated under the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement. XPLR OpCo will dissolve upon:
· the election of XPLR OpCo GP to dissolve it, if approved by the holders of units representing a unit majority and our general partner;
· there being no limited partners, unless XPLR OpCo is continued without dissolution in accordance with applicable Delaware law;
· the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of XPLR OpCo’s partnership; or
· the withdrawal or removal of XPLR OpCo GP or any other event that results in its ceasing to be XPLR OpCo GP, other than by reason of a transfer of its general partner interest in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement or withdrawal or removal followed by approval and admission of a successor.
Upon a dissolution under the last clause above, the holders of a unit majority may also elect, within specific time limitations, to continue XPLR OpCo’s business on the same terms and conditions described in the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement by appointing as a successor general partner an entity approved by the holders of units representing a unit majority, subject to XPLR OpCo’s receipt of an opinion of counsel to the effect that the action would not result in the loss of limited liability of any limited partner.
Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds
Upon XPLR OpCo’s dissolution, unless it is continued as a new limited partnership, the liquidator authorized to wind up XPLR OpCo’s affairs will, acting with all of the powers of XPLR OpCo GP that are necessary or appropriate, liquidate XPLR OpCo’s assets and apply the proceeds of the liquidation as described in “Provisions of the Partnership Agreements and Other Arrangements Relating to Cash Distributions—Provisions of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions—Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation” and “Material Provisions of the XPLR OpCo Partnership Agreement—Issuance of Additional Partnership Interests—OpCo Class B Units.” The liquidator may defer liquidation or distribution of XPLR OpCo’s assets for a reasonable period of time or distribute assets to partners in kind if it determines that a sale would be impractical or would cause undue loss to XPLR OpCo’s partners.
- 32 -
Withdrawal or Removal of the General Partner
XPLR OpCo GP may voluntarily withdraw as general partner of XPLR OpCo without first obtaining approval of any unitholder by giving 90 days’ written notice that such withdrawal will not violate the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement. Upon voluntary withdrawal of XPLR OpCo GP by giving written notice to the other partners, the holders of a unit majority may select a successor, which shall be approved by our general partner. If a successor is not elected, or is elected but an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability cannot be obtained, XPLR OpCo will be dissolved, wound up and liquidated, unless, within a specified period after that withdrawal, the holders of a unit majority agree to continue XPLR OpCo’s business by appointing a successor general partner. See “— Termination and Dissolution.”
XPLR OpCo GP may not be removed unless our general partner is removed as our general partner. If our general partner is removed as general partner by unitholders, XPLR OpCo GP will also be removed as general partner of XPLR OpCo. Any removal of XPLR OpCo GP is also subject to the approval of a successor general partner by the vote of the holders of a unit majority.
Transfer of General Partner Units
XPLR OpCo GP and its affiliates may at any time transfer XPLR OpCo’s general partner units to one or more persons without unitholder approval, although such transfer requires the consent of our general partner.
Transfer of Ownership Interests in the General Partner
At any time, NEE and its affiliates, including us, may sell or transfer all or part of their direct or indirect interest in XPLR OpCo GP without the approval of XPLR OpCo’s unitholders.
Status as Limited Partner
By transfer of common units in accordance with the XPLR OpCo partnership agreement, each transferee of common units will be admitted as a limited partner with respect to XPLR OpCo common units transferred when such transfer and admission is reflected in XPLR OpCo’s register.
Indemnification
Under its partnership agreement, in most circumstances, XPLR OpCo will indemnify the following persons, to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and against all losses, claims, damages or similar events:
· XPLR OpCo GP;
· any departing general partner;
· any person who is or was an affiliate of a general partner or any departing general partner;
· any person who is or was a director, officer, managing member, manager, general partner, fiduciary or trustee of XPLR OpCo, any of XPLR OpCo’s subsidiaries or any entity set forth in the preceding three bullet points;
· any person who is or was serving as director, officer, managing member, manager, general partner, fiduciary or trustee of another person owing certain duties to XPLR OpCo or any of its subsidiaries at the request of XPLR OpCo GP or any departing general partner or any of their affiliates; and
· any person designated by XPLR OpCo GP.
- 33 -
Any indemnification under these provisions will only be out of XPLR OpCo’s assets. Unless it otherwise agrees, XPLR OpCo GP will not be personally liable for XPLR OpCo’s indemnification obligations, or have any obligation to contribute or lend funds or assets to XPLR OpCo to enable it to effectuate indemnification.
Reimbursement of Expenses
The XPLR OpCo partnership agreement requires XPLR OpCo to reimburse XPLR OpCo GP for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or payments it makes on XPLR OpCo’s behalf or otherwise incurred by XPLR OpCo GP in connection with operating XPLR OpCo’s business.
Books and Reports
XPLR OpCo GP is required to keep appropriate books of XPLR OpCo’s business at XPLR OpCo’s principal offices. The books will be maintained for financial reporting purposes on an accrual basis. For tax and fiscal reporting purposes, XPLR OpCo’s fiscal year is the calendar year.
- 34 -
Document
Exhibit 10.9
AMENDED AND RESTATED RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 17th day of February, 2025, by and among XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“XPLR”), XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATING PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“XPLR Operating LP”), and NEXTERA ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“NEER”), each a “Party” and, collectively, the “Parties.” This Agreement shall become effective on the date first written above (the “Effective Time”).
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, NEER has created XPLR to own, operate and acquire contracted clean energy projects with stable, long-term cash flows through its interests in XPLR Operating LP;
WHEREAS, XPLR expects to grow its business and its operating cash flows through, among other things, operating and acquiring contracted clean energy projects with stable, long-term cash flows, which may be sold from time to time to third parties, including NEER or any of its Subsidiaries (as hereinafter defined);
WHEREAS, XPLR Operating LP granted NEER a right of first refusal to acquire the XPLR Operating LP ROFR Assets (as hereinafter defined) owned by XPLR Operating LP and its Subsidiaries on the terms and conditions set forth in the Right of First Refusal Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2017 (the “Original Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Parties hereby desire to amend and restate the Original Agreement in order to reflect changes in the names of certain entities and related changes;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1 Definitions. The following terms when used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth in this Section 1.1.
“Affiliate” means, with respect to the Person in question, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, Controls or is Controlled by such Person or is under common Control of a third Person.
“Agreement” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
“Applicable Law” means all statutes, laws, common law, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or other legal requirements of any Governmental Authority and quasi-governmental agencies or entities, and any judgment, injunction, order, directive, decree or other judicial or
\4127-3278-9334 v5
regulatory requirement of any court or Governmental Authority affecting or relating to the Person or property in question.
“Business Day” means any day other than Saturday, Sunday or any federal legal holiday.
“Conflicts Committee” means the conflicts committee of the board of directors of XPLR, as defined in the XPLR LP Agreement.
“Control” means the control by one Person of another Person in accordance with the following: a Person (“A”) controls another Person (“B”) where A has the power to determine the management and policies of B by contract or status (for example the status of A being the managing member of B) or by virtue of beneficial ownership of or control over a majority of the voting or economic interests in B. For the purpose of certainty and without limitation, if A owns or has control over securities to which are attached more than fifty percent (50%) of the votes permitted to be cast in the election of directors to the Governing Body of B or, if A is the general partner of B (a limited partnership), then in each case A Controls B for this purpose, and the tern’ “Controlled” has the corresponding meaning.
“Effective Time” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
“Final Negotiation Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3.
“Financing Party” means any and all Persons, or the agents or trustees representing them, providing senior or subordinated debt financing or refinancing (including letters of credit, bank guaranties or other credit support).
“Governing Body” means (a) with respect to a corporation, the board of directors of such corporation, (b) with respect to a limited liability company, the manager(s) or managing member(s) of such limited liability company, (c) with respect to a limited partnership, the board, committee or other body of the limited partnership or the general partner of such partnership that serves a similar function or the general partner itself (or if any such general partner is itself a limited partnership, the board, committee or other body of such general partner’s general partner that serves a similar function or such general partner’s general partner itself) and (d) with respect to any other Person, the body of such Person that serves a similar function, and in the case of each of clauses (a) through (d) includes any committee or other subdivision of such body and any Person to whom such body has delegated any power or authority, including any officer or managing director.
“Governmental Approval” means any authorization, consent, approval, license, permit, franchise, tariff, certificate of authority, registration, rate, certification, agreement, directive, waiver, exemption, variance, other similar consent of any Governmental Authority.
“Governmental Authority” means any federal, state or local government or political subdivision thereof, including, without limitation, any agency or entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, regulatory or administrative governmental powers or functions, in each case to the extent the same has jurisdiction over the Person or property in question.
“Lien” means any mortgage, pledge, hypothecation, assignment, deposit arrangement, encumbrance, lien (statutory or other), charge, preference, priority or other security interest or preferential arrangement in the nature of a security interest of any kind or nature whatsoever (including any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, any easement, right of way or other encumbrance on title to real property, and any financing lease having substantially the same economic effect as any of the foregoing).
“Losses” means, with respect to the Person in question, any actual liability, damage (but expressly excluding any consequential and punitive damages), loss, cost or expense, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees and expenses and court costs, incurred by such Person, as a result of the act, omission or occurrence in question.
“NEE” means NextEra Energy, Inc.
“NEER” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
“NEER Acceptance” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3.
“Negotiation Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.1.
“Notice” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1.
“Party” or “Parties” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
“Person” means any natural person, corporation, general or limited partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, trust, estate, Governmental Authority or other legal entity, in each case whether in its own or a representative capacity.
“Proposed Sale Terms” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3.
“Required Securities Disclosure” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1.
“Sale” means, other than in connection with any granting of Liens permitted under any indebtedness in respect of any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset that is incurred from time to time and any disposition of assets resulting from the enforcement of such Liens, any direct or indirect sale of any equity interest in, or all or substantially all of the assets of, any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset; provided, that this definition shall not include any (i) merger of XPLR Operating LP with or into, or sale of substantially all of XPLR Operating LP’s assets to, a Third Party or (ii) any direct or indirect sale of an XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset or any of its assets so long as, following the consummation of such sale, XPLR Operating LP directly or indirectly holds 100% of the ownership interests in, and maintains Control over, such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset and such assets; provided, the terms of any such sale referred to in clause (ii) above will not limit, delay or hinder the ability of NEER or any of its Subsidiaries to acquire such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset from XPLR Operating LP or any of its Subsidiaries in accordance with the terms of this Agreement if and when XPLR Operating LP or any of its Subsidiaries elects to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to a Third Party.
“Special Voting Units” has the meaning ascribed to it in the XPLR LP Agreement.
“Subsidiary” means any entity that is, directly or indirectly, Controlled by a Party.
“Term” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.
“Termination Event” means the occurrence of any of the following:
(a) the withdrawal of XPLR Partners GP from being general partner of XPLR in accordance with Section 11.1 of the XPLR LP Agreement;
(b) the removal of XPLR Partners GP from being general partner of XPLR if the XPLR Units (including the Special Voting Units) held by XPLR Partners GP and its Affiliates did not vote in favor of such removal;
(c) the failure of NEE to Control, directly or indirectly, XPLR Partners GP or any other Person that is general partner of XPLR; and
(d) the failure of NEE to own, directly or indirectly, at least (i) 50.1% of the voting interests of NEER, (ii) at least 33.33% of the economic interests of NEER or (iii) more of the economic interests in NEER than any other Person.
“Third Party” means any Person other than a Party or an Affiliate of a Party.
“Third Party Final Sale Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3.
“Third Party Negotiation Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.1.
“Third Party Offers” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.2.
“Transaction Notice” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.1.
“XPLR” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
“XPLR LP Agreement” means that certain Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of XPLR Infrastructure, LP, dated as of August 4, 2017, as amended from time to time.
“XPLR Operating LP” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
“XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1.
“XPLR Operating LP Indemnitees” means XPLR and its Subsidiaries (which shall not include any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset prior to the acquisition thereof by NEER or any of its Subsidiaries), and each of their respective shareholders, members, partners, trustees, beneficiaries, directors, officers, employees, attorneys, accountants, consultants and agents, and the successors, assigns, legal representatives and heirs of each of the foregoing.
“XPLR Operating LP ROFR Assets” means all assets owned or hereafter acquired by XPLR Operating LP or its Subsidiaries.
“XPLR Partners GP” means XPLR Infrastructure Partners GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation and the general partner of XPLR.
“XPLR Units” means the “Units” under the XPLR LP Agreement.
Section 1.2 Headings and Table of Contents.
The inclusion of headings and a table of contents in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the construction or interpretation hereof.
Section 1.3 Interpretation.
In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires:
(a) words importing the singular shall include the plural and vice versa, words importing gender shall include all genders or the neuter, and words importing the neuter shall include all genders;
(b) the words “include,” “includes,” “including,” or any variations thereof, when following any general term or statement, are not to be construed as limiting the general term or statement to the specific items or matters set forth or to similar items or matters, but rather as referring to all other items or matters that could reasonably fall within the broadest possible scope of the general term or statement;
(c) references to any Person include such Person’s successors and permitted assigns;
(d) any reference to a statute, regulation, policy, rule or instrument shall include, and shall be deemed to be a reference also to, all amendments made to such statute, regulation, policy, rule or instrument and to any statute, regulation, policy, rule or instrument that may be passed which has the effect of supplementing or superseding the statute, regulation, policy, rule or instrument so referred to;
(e) any reference to this Agreement or any other agreement, document or instrument shall be construed as a reference to this Agreement or, as the case may be, such other agreement, document or instrument as the same may have been, or may from time to time be, amended, varied, replaced, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified;
(f) in the event that any day on which any amount is to be determined or any action is required to be taken hereunder is not a Business Day, then such amount shall be determined or such action shall be required to be taken at or before the requisite time on the next succeeding day that is a Business Day;
(g) except where otherwise expressly provided, all amounts in this Agreement are stated and shall be paid in U.S. currency;
(h) the words “herein,” “hereof,” “hereby” and “hereunder,” and words of similar import, shall be construed to refer to this Agreement in its entirety, not to any particular article or section hereof and not to any particular provision hereof, except where the context otherwise requires; and
(i) all references herein to Articles, Sections, Exhibits and Schedules shall be construed to refer to Articles and Sections of, and Exhibits and Schedules to, this Agreement, unless otherwise indicated.
ARTICLE II
RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL ON XPLR OPERATING LP ROFR ASSETS
Section 2.1 Notice of Transaction Related to XPLR Operating LP ROFR Assets and Initial Negotiation of Definitive Terms for Transaction. Prior to engaging in any negotiation with a Third Party regarding any proposed Sale of any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset (or any portion thereof), XPLR Operating LP must deliver to NEER a written notice setting forth in reasonable detail the material terms and conditions of the proposed transaction (such notice, a “Transaction Notice”) and for the next 30 days (the “Negotiation Period”) engage in non-binding discussions and negotiations in good faith with NEER to attempt to agree on definitive terms acceptable to both Parties, in their sole and absolute discretion, for the Sale of the applicable XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to NEER or any of its Subsidiaries. If, by the end of the Negotiation Period, the Parties have not agreed to definitive terms for the Sale of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to NEER, XPLR Operating LP will have the right, within 30 days following such Negotiation Period (the “Third Party Negotiation Period”), to engage in non-binding discussions and negotiations in good faith with a Third Party with respect to a Sale of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to such Third Party in accordance with the terms of Section 2.2.
Section 2.2 Negotiations with Third Parties. Neither XPLR Operating LP nor any of its representatives, agents or Affiliates (other than NEER and its Subsidiaries, which Subsidiaries shall not include any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset prior to the acquisition thereof by NEER or any of its Subsidiaries) shall solicit offers from, or negotiate or enter into any agreement with, any Third Party for the Sale of any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset (or any portion thereof) until the expiration of the Negotiation Period related to such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset and the applicable proposed Sale. NEER agrees and acknowledges that during the Third Party Negotiation Period for any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset, XPLR Operating LP shall have the absolute right to solicit offers from and negotiate with any Third Party for the Sale of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset (such offers from any Third Party, the “Third Party Offers”).
Section 2.3 Final Negotiation with NEER. On or prior to the end of the Third Party Negotiation Period, XPLR Operating LP shall promptly deliver to NEER a written notice setting forth in reasonable detail the material terms and conditions of any Third Party Offer (the “Proposed Sale Terms”) and for the next 30 days (the “Final Negotiation Period”) recommence and engage in non-binding discussions and negotiations in good faith with NEER to attempt to agree on definitive -leans acceptable to both Parties, in their sole and absolute discretion, for the Sale of the applicable XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to NEER or any of its
Subsidiaries; provided, that if NEER agrees to terms substantially consistent with the Proposed Sale Terms (a “NEER Acceptance”), XPLR Operating LP may no longer sell the applicable XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to the Third Party that made such Third Party Offer. If, by the end of the Final Negotiation Period, the Parties have not agreed to definitive terms for the Sale of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to NEER and no NEER Acceptance has occurred, XPLR Operating LP will have the right, within 30 days following such Final Negotiation Period (the “Third Party Final Sale Period”), to consummate a Sale of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to such Third Party (or agree in writing to undertake such Sale to such Third Party) in accordance with the terms of Section 2.4.
Section 2.4 Sale to Third Parties. Neither XPLR Operating LP nor any of its representatives, agents or Affiliates (other than NEER, which shall not include any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset prior to the acquisition thereof by NEER or any of its Subsidiaries) shall enter into any agreement with any Third Party for the Sale of any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset (or any portion thereof) until the conditions set forth in Section 2.3 related to such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset and the applicable proposed Sale have been satisfied. NEER agrees and acknowledges that during the Third Party Final Sale Period for any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset and the applicable proposed Sale: (a) XPLR Operating LP shall have the absolute right to enter into agreements with any Third Party for the Sale of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset, on terms substantially consistent with and in any event not materially less favorable to XPLR Operating LP than those set forth in the Proposed Sale Terms, and (b) XPLR Operating LP shall have no further obligation to negotiate with NEER regarding, or offer NEER the opportunity to acquire any interest in, such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset; provided, that following any Third Party Final Sale Period for any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset during which no Sale to a Third Party occurred, XPLR Operating LP shall comply with this ARTICLE II prior to any Sale of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to a Third Party (or any entry into any agreement in writing to undertake such Sale).
Section 2.5 Governmental Approval and Third-Party Consent. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the consummation of any Sale pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be subject to obtaining all requisite Governmental Approvals and consent from third parties as determined by NEER.
Section 2.6 Relationship with Other Agreements. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, NEER’s right of first refusal on any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset set forth in this Agreement shall not limit, delay or hinder any right of first offer or right of first refusal on such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset that has been granted by XPLR Operating LP or any of its Affiliates to a third party as of the date hereof (such right of first offer or right of first refusal, the “Existing Right”), including, but not limited to, pursuant to the terms of any power purchase agreement to which XPLR Operating LP or any of its Affiliates is a party. To the extent that there is any conflict between the terms of the Existing Right and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of the Existing Right shall prevail.
ARTICLE III
TERM; TERMINATION RIGHTS
Section 3.1 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with this ARTICLE III, the term of this Agreement (the “Term”) shall commence at the Effective Time and shall continue in effect indefinitely.
Section 3.2 Termination Rights.
(a) NEER or XPLR Operating LP, as the case may be, shall have the right, with written notice to the other Party, (A) to terminate this Agreement if the other Party materially breaches or defaults in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement or (B) to terminate this Agreement with respect to any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset if the other Party materially breaches or defaults in the performance of its obligations under any transaction agreement for the Sale of such XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset to NEER or one of its Subsidiaries; provided, that in each case such breach or default is continuing for 90 days after such breaching Party has been given a written notice specifying such default or breach and requiring it to be remedied and stating that such notice is a “Notice of Default.”
(b) NEER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time after a Termination Event by delivering written notice of termination to XPLR Operating LP, and such termination shall become effective immediately upon XPLR Operating LP’s receipt of such notice.
(c) Upon any termination under this Section 3.2 the Parties shall have no further rights or obligations under this Agreement, except those that expressly survive the termination of this Agreement.
Section 3.3 Exclusive Remedy. Other than with respect to a breach or default in the performance of a Party’s indemnification obligations under ARTICLE IV, each Party’s sole and exclusive remedy for a breach or default by the other Party of its obligations under this Agreement shall be to terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 3.2.
ARTICLE IV
CONFIDENTIALITY
Section 4.1 XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information. NEER shall, and shall cause its Affiliates (other than XPLR and its Subsidiaries) and its and their officers, directors and employees to, keep confidential and not make any public announcement or disclose to any Person any terms of any other documents, materials, data or other information with respect to any XPLR Operating LP ROFR Asset which is not generally known to the public (the “XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information”); provided, however, that XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information shall not include (a) the terms and conditions of this Agreement or (b) information that becomes available to NEER on a non-confidential basis from a source other than XPLR and its Subsidiaries or their directors, officers or employees (provided that, to NEER’ s knowledge, such source was not prohibited from disclosing such information to NEER by any
legal, contractual or fiduciary duty). Notwithstanding the foregoing, NEER shall be permitted to (1) disclose any XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information to the extent required by court order or under Applicable Law (provided, that it shall (A) exercise commercially reasonable efforts to preserve the confidentiality of such XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information, (B) to the extent legally permissible, use commercially reasonable efforts to provide XPLR and its Subsidiaries, in advance of such disclosure, with copies of any XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information it intends to disclose (and, if applicable, the text of the disclosure language itself), and (C) reasonably cooperate with XPLR and its Subsidiaries to the extent they may seek to limit such disclosure, (2) make a public announcement regarding such matters (A) as agreed to in writing by XPLR or (B) as required by the provisions of any securities laws or the requirements of any exchange on which NEE’ s securities may be listed (a “Required Securities Disclosure”), or (3) disclose any XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information to its Affiliates (other than XPLR and its Subsidiaries) and its and their shareholders, partners, members, directors, officers, employees, lenders, attorneys, consultants or other advisors (it being understood that the Persons to whom such disclosure is made will be informed of the confidential nature of such XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information and instructed to keep such XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information confidential pursuant to the terms hereof); provided, however, that, other than in connection with a Required Securities Disclosure, NEER shall (x) advise such Person of the confidential nature of such XPLR Operating LP Confidential Information, and (y) cause such Person to be bound by obligations of confidentiality that are no less stringent than the obligations set forth herein. NEER shall indemnify and hold harmless the XPLR Operating LP Indemnitees for any Losses incurred by any of the XPLR Operating LP Indemnitees for a breach or default of NEER’ s obligations under this Section 4.1. This Section 4.1 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Section 5.1 Notices.
(a) Method of Delivery. All notices, requests, demands and other communications (each, a “Notice”) required to be provided to the other Party pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered (i) in person, (ii) by certified U.S. mail, with postage prepaid and return receipt requested, (iii) by overnight courier service, or (iv) by facsimile transmittal, with a verification copy sent on the same day by any of the methods set forth in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii), to the other Party to this Agreement at the following address or facsimile number (or to such other address or facsimile number as the Parties may designate from time to time pursuant to this Section 5.1):
If to XPLR:
XPLR Infrastructure, LP
c/o XPLR Infrastructure Partners GP, Inc.
700 Universe Boulevard
Juno Beach, FL 33408
Attn: Corporate Secretary
Facsimile: (561) 691-7702
Email: David.Flechner@nexteraenergy.com
If to XPLR Operating LP:
XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP
c/o XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners GP, LLC
700 Universe Boulevard
Juno Beach, FL 33408
Attn: Secretary
Facsimile: (561) 691-7702
Email: Jason.Pear@nexteraenergy.com
If to NEER:
NextEra Energy Resources, LLC
700 Universe Boulevard
Juno Beach, FL 33408
Attn: General Counsel
Facsimile: (561) 691-7702
Email: Mitch.Ross@nexteraenergy.com
(b) Receipt of Notices. All Notices sent by any Party under this Agreement shall be deemed to have been received by the Party to whom such Notice is sent upon (i) delivery to the address or facsimile number of the recipient Party, provided that such delivery is made prior to 5:00 p.m. (local time for the recipient Party) on a Business Day, otherwise the following Business Day, or (ii) the attempted delivery of such Notice if (A) such recipient Party refuses delivery of such Notice, or (B) such recipient Party is no longer at such address or facsimile number, and such recipient Party failed to provide the sending Party with its current address or facsimile number pursuant to this Section 5.1).
(c) Change of Address. The Parties and their respective counsel shall have the right to change their respective address and/or facsimile number for the purposes of this Section 5.1 by providing a Notice of such change in address and/or facsimile as required under this Section 5.1.
Section 5.2 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement; provided, however, that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, if the time period for the performance of any covenant or obligation, satisfaction of any condition or delivery of any notice or item required under this Agreement shall expire on a day other than a Business Day, such time period shall be extended automatically to the next Business Day.
Section 5.3 Assignment. No Party shall assign this Agreement or any interest therein to any Person, without the prior written consent of the other Parties (which consent may be withheld in a Party’s sole discretion). Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude (i) any pledge, hypothecation or other transfer or assignment of a Party’s rights, title and interest under this Agreement, including any amounts payable to such Party under this Agreement, to a bona fide Financing Party as security for debt financing to such
Section 5.4 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns (which include XPLR Operating LP’s Subsidiaries).
Section 5.5 Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall not confer any rights or remedies on any Person other than (i) the Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns (including NEER’ s Subsidiaries), and (ii) the XPLR Operating LP Indemnitees to the extent such XPLR Operating LP Indemnitees are expressly granted certain rights of indemnification in this Agreement.
Section 5.6 Other Activities. No Party hereto shall be prohibited from engaging in or holding an interest in any other business ventures of any kind or description, or any responsibility to account to the other for the income or profits of any such enterprises or have this Agreement be deemed to constitute any agreement not to compete. This Agreement shall not be deemed to create a partnership, joint venture, association or any other similar relationship between the Parties.
Section 5.7 GOVERNING LAW. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO ANY PRINCIPLES REGARDING CONFLICT OF LAWS.
Section 5.8 Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is held to be or rendered invalid or unenforceable at any time in any jurisdiction, such term or provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other terms or provisions of this Agreement, or the validity or enforceability of such affected terms or provisions at any other time or in any other jurisdiction.
Section 5.9 JURISDICTION; VENUE. ANY LITIGATION OR OTHER COURT PROCEEDING WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER ARISING FROM OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN THE COURTS OF RECORD IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE OR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE, AND THE PARTIES HEREBY SUBMIT TO JURISDICTION AND CONSENT TO VENUE IN SUCH COURTS.
Section 5.10 WAIVER OF TRIAL BY JURY. THE PARTIES HEREBY WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LITIGATION OR OTHER COURT PROCEEDING BY EITHER PARTY AGAINST THE OTHER PARTY WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER ARISING FROM OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT.
Section 5.11 Prevailing Party. If any litigation or other court action, arbitration or similar adjudicatory proceeding is sought, taken, instituted or brought by any Party to enforce its rights under this Agreement, all fees, costs and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees and court costs, of the prevailing Party in such action, suit or proceeding shall be borne by the Party against whose interest the judgment or decision is rendered.
Section 5.12 Recitals, Exhibits and Schedules. The recitals to this Agreement, and all exhibits and schedules referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by such reference and made a part of this Agreement. Any matter disclosed in any schedule to this Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in all other schedules to this Agreement.
Section 5.13 Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties hereto, and shall supersede any other agreements and understandings (written or oral) between or among any of the Parties on or prior to the date of this Agreement with respect to the matters contemplated in this Agreement.
Section 5.14 Amendments to Agreement. No amendment, supplement or other modification to any terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and executed and delivered by each of the Parties hereto; provided, however, that XPLR may not, without the prior approval of the Conflicts Committee, agree to any amendment or modification of this Agreement that, in the reasonable discretion of the board of directors of XPLR, would be adverse in any material respect to the holders of its common units representing limited partner interests.
Section 5.15 Facsimile; Counterparts. Any Party may deliver executed signature pages to this Agreement by facsimile transmission to the other Parties, which facsimile copy shall be deemed to be an original executed signature page; provided, however, that such Party shall deliver an original signature page to the other Parties promptly thereafter. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which counterparts together shall constitute one agreement with the same effect as if the Parties had signed the same signature page.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered in their names by their respective duly authorized officers or representatives.
| XPLR: | |
|---|---|
| XPLR Infrastructure, LP | |
| By: | XPLR Infrastructure Partners GP, Inc., its General |
| Partner | |
| By: | S. ALAN LIU |
| S. Alan Liu | |
| Chief Executive Officer | |
| XPLR Operating LP: | |
| --- | --- |
| XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP | |
| By: | XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners GP, |
| LLC, its General Partner | |
| By: | CHRISTOPHER H. ZAJIC |
| Christopher H. Zajic | |
| Vice President | |
| NEER | |
| NextEra Energy Resources, LLC | |
| By: | CHRISTOPHER H. ZAJIC |
| Christopher H. Zajic | |
| Vice President, Finance |
Document
Exhibit 10.15
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR INDEPENDENT NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR OF
XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
(Effective January 1, 2026)
| Annual Retainer<br><br>(payable quarterly) | $90,000 |
|---|---|
| Committee Chair retainer (annual)<br><br>(payable quarterly) | $15,000 |
| Annual grant of restricted common units<br><br>(under 2024 Long-Term Incentive Plan) | That number of common units determined by dividing $150,000 by closing price of XPLR Infrastructure, LP common units on effective date of grant (rounded up to the nearest 10 common units) |
| Miscellaneous | Travel and Accident Insurance (including spouse coverage) |
Document
Exhibit 10.19
EXECUTION VERSION
Interconnection Sales and Co-Investment Agreement
This Interconnection Sales and Co-Investment Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated as of February 10, 2026 (the “Effective Date”), is by and between NextEra Energy Resources Development, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with offices located at 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, Florida 33408 (“NEER”) and XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP a Delaware limited partnership, with offices located at 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, Florida 33408 (“XPLR” and together with NEER, the “Parties,” and each a “Party”).
WHEREAS, NEER, by and through its Affiliates, is in the business of developing, owning and operating energy infrastructure projects, including battery storage projects; and
WHEREAS, XPLR, by and through its Affiliates, is the owner of certain energy infrastructure projects which have, or will have, the interconnection rights to support future co-located battery storage projects; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement pursuant to which the Parties will (a) form one or more joint venture(s) (each a “Project JV” and collectively the “Project JVs”) to develop, construct and operate one or more battery energy storage system projects (each a “Project” and collectively, the “Projects”), and cause to be transferred, by way of a sale, certain Interconnection Assets from XPLR Member (as defined below) to a Project JV as a co-investment project with NEER Member (as defined below), or (b) cause to be transferred, by way of a sale, certain Interconnection Assets from XPLR Member to NEER Member to allow NEER Member to develop a project to be exclusively owned by NEER Member utilizing such Interconnection Assets.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the mutual covenants set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Definitions. Capitalized terms have the meaning set forth in this Section1.
“Affiliate” of a Person means any other Person that directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with, such Person; provided that for the purposes of this Agreement, none of XPLR or any of its controlled Affiliates shall be considered an Affiliate of NEER or any of its Affiliates.
“Agents” means, with respect to a Party, its officers, directors, members, managers, employees, agents, contractors, and consultants.
“Agreement” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“BESS Project” and “BESS Projects” have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2.
“BOT” means a Build Own Transfer Agreement, where Project JV sells a fully developed project to a non-Affiliate for a fee.
“Business Day” means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or other day on which commercial banks in the State of New York and in the State of Florida are authorized or required by Law to be closed for business.
1
23504846v1
“Change of Control” means (a) with respect to any XPLR Member any consolidation, merger or recapitalization of such XPLR Member, or any sale, exchange, conveyance or other disposition of equity securities of such XPLR Member in a single transaction or a series of transactions, in which the equity holders of such XPLR Member immediately prior to such consolidation, merger, recapitalization, sale, transaction or first of such series of transactions, own or are entitled to less than fifty percent (50%) of such XPLR Member’s or any successor entity’s (i) issued and outstanding equity securities, (ii) voting rights, or (iii) rights to distributions, in each case, immediately after such consolidation, merger, recapitalization, sale, transaction or series of such transactions; (b) with respect to any XPLR Member any sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of such XPLR Member; (c) the adoption of a plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of XPLR or XPLR Parent; or (d) the first day on which XPLR Parent ceases to own 100% of the equity interests of the general partner of XPLR.
“COD Losses” mean any and all claims, demands, suits, legal proceedings, liabilities, losses, damages, payments, deficiencies, awards, settlements, assessments, judgments, fines, costs and expenses (including the reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel or, accountants and other professional fees and expenses, court costs and other costs of enforcing rights hereunder), interest and penalties incurred, sustained, or suffered by NEER, any other applicable NEER Member or Project JV under any PPA, ESSA, or other material project agreements as a result of NEER Member or Project JV being unable to perform their respective obligations under such PPA, ESSA, or other material project agreements that are directly caused by or arise out of XPLR or XPLR Member failing to sell the applicable Project Interconnection Assets, Transferred Interconnection Assets or the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset on or before the applicable Outside Contribution Date.
“Confidential Information” has the meaning set forth in Section8.1(a).
“Control” (and with correlative meanings, the terms “Controlled by” and “under common Control with”) means, with respect to any Person, the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of another Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise.
“Declined Project” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1.
“Defaulting Party” has the meaning set forth in Section8.8(c).
“Definitive Documents” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.3.
“Designated Co-Investment Opportunity” and “Designated Co-Investment Opportunities” have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1.
“Designated Co-Development Opportunity Rejection Notice” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.
“Development Plan” means, in respect of each Designated Co-Investment Opportunity, a development plan to build a Project, including (a) a detailed financial model (including (i) the capital budget, (ii) total development, financing and construction costs, and (iii) projected IRR), (b) proposed revenue construct (PPA, ESSA, BOT, etc.), (c) proposed construction schedule, (d) to NEER’s Knowledge, a list of required consents for either NEER Member and XPLR Member, and
2
23504846v1
(e) information regarding potential offtakers (for PPA, ESSA, etc.) or buyers (for Build Own Transfers (BOTs).
“Development Notice” means the written notice provided by the applicable NEER Member to the applicable XPLR Member identifying a Designated Co-Investment Opportunity where such NEER Member intends to develop, construct and operate a Project, which notice attaches a copy of the Development Plan.
“Dispute” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.7.
“Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“ESSA” means an Energy Storage Services Agreement.
“Excess Third Party Financing Costs” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(b).
“Exclusive NEER Project” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.4.
“Financing Party” means any and all Persons or successors in interest thereof lending money, extending credit or providing loan guarantees to a Party in connection with this Agreement.
“GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States as in effect from time to time, consistently applied with past practices.
“Governmental Authority” means any federal, state, regional, county, town, province, city or municipal government, whether domestic or foreign, or any department, agency, bureau, or other legislative, executive, administrative, regulatory or judicial body of any such government including any governmental or quasi-governmental entity, tribunal, any self-regulated organization, independent system operator, or regional transmission operator.
“Indebtedness” means with respect to any Person, and without duplication, all outstanding obligations of such Person (a) in respect of indebtedness for borrowed money, whether current or funded, secured or unsecured, including current and long-term portions of bank debt, mortgages, stockholder loans and other loans, unpaid installment obligations, bonds, debentures, notes payable and other similar debt securities or instruments, (b) in respect of indebtedness secured by (or for which the holder of such Indebtedness has an existing right, contingent or otherwise, to be secured by) any lien existing on property or assets owned or acquired by, or equity securities of, such Person and subject thereto, (c) any obligation evidenced by hedging, interest rate or currency protection agreements or similar instruments, (d) in respect of letters of credit, to the extent drawn, and bankers’ acceptances, surety bonds or similar credit transactions issued, (e) issued or assumed as the deferred purchase price of property or services, (f) all obligations of such Person in respect of off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions that are in the nature of, or in substitution for, financings, (g) any accrued but unpaid interest, expenses, fees, prepayment premiums, overage charges, breakage costs, make-whole payments, indemnities, termination penalties or other amounts in respect of the foregoing payable as a result of repayment of the foregoing, and (h) all obligations of the type referred to in clauses (a)-(g) the payment of which such Person is responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, as obligor, guarantor, surety or otherwise, including guarantees of such obligations. For the avoidance of doubt, this definition of “Indebtedness” shall not include any Third Party Financing Costs.
“Indemnity Notice” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.4.
3
23504846v1
“Initial Development Asset Value” means the value of the NEER Member’s Initial Development Assets to be transferred to the associated Project JV, which shall be equal to their associated historical cost as reasonably determined in good faith by NEER Member in accordance with GAAP.
“Initial Development Assets” means the NEER Member assets and rights required to enable the development of the relevant Project at the associated XPLR Renewable Project site, including a PPA, ESSA and any other material project agreements executed on or prior to the Required Contribution Date that enables the BESS Project.
“Interconnection Assets” means the necessary interconnection assets and rights required to enable the development of the related Project or Exclusive NEER Project, including, without limitation, the physical interconnection assets, land rights, interconnection agreement, shared facilities rights, and any other rights or assets reasonably necessary to enable the development of the related Project or Exclusive NEER Project, in each case, proportionately owned by XPLR or XPLR Member.
“Investment Option Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.
“Investment Option Exercise Notice” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.
“Law” means any statute, law, ordinance, regulation, rule, code, order, constitution, treaty, common law, judgment, decree, other requirement or rule of law of any federal, state, local, or foreign government or political subdivision thereof, or any arbitrator, court, or tribunal of competent jurisdiction.
“Material Manner” means the following material change in a Development Plan: (i) an increase of the proposed Project IRR in excess of 100 basis points from the original Development Notice; (ii) replacement of a battery energy storage system with another technology; or (iii) new revenue plan that contemplates switching from a PPA or ESSA to a BOT model.
“NEER” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“NEER Election Notice” has the meaning set forth in Section4.2.
“NEER Election Period” has the meaning set forth in Section4.2.
“NEER Member” means NEER or any of its Affiliates.
“NEER Third Party Consent Cap Amount” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(b).
“NEER’s Knowledge” means the actual knowledge, after reasonable internal consultation but without any obligation of due inquiry, of Anthony Pedroni and Dexter Liu.
“Outside Contribution Date” means the date set forth in the “Outside Contribution Date” column of Exhibit A and Exhibit B in respect of the applicable Project Interconnection Assets, Transferred Interconnection Assets or the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset.
“Party” and “Parties” have the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“Person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, trust, limited liability entity, unincorporated organization, association, Governmental Authority, or any other entity.
“Permitted Liens” means (i) liens for taxes, assessments, or other governmental charges or levies not yet due and payable or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP; (ii) liens imposed by
4
23504846v1
law; (iii) liens arising in the ordinary course of business for amounts not yet overdue or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP; (iv) easements, rights-of-way, restrictions, encroachments, minor defects or irregularities in title, and other similar encumbrances affecting real property that, in the aggregate, do not materially interfere with the ordinary conduct of business or materially impair the value of the affected property; (v) liens in favor of NEER or a NEER Member under this Agreement; and (vi) any other liens expressly approved in writing by NEER or a NEER Member from time to time.
“PPA” means a Purchase Power Agreement.
“Project” and “Projects” have the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“Project Interconnection Assets” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3(a).
“Project JV” and “Project JVs” have the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“Project JV LLCA” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4(a).
“Required Ancillary Agreements” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.5.
“Required Contribution Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3(b).
“Required Disclosure” has the meaning set forth in Section8.2.
“Senior Management Negotiation Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.7.
“Shared Facilities Agreement” means a new or amended Shared Facilities Agreement, as the case may be, which transfers ownership interests in the requisite Interconnection Assets to NEER Member.
“Surplus Interconnection Consideration” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3(c).
“Term” has the meaning set forth in Section8.8(a).
“Third Party Financing Costs” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(b).
“Transferred Interconnection Assets” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1.
“Transferred Project” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.1.
“Transferred Project Interconnection Asset” means the applicable Interconnection Assets with respect to the Transferred Project set forth on Exhibit B.
“Updated Investment Option Exercise Notice” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1.
“Updated Investment Option Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1.
“Updated Investment Option Rights” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1.
“Updated Project” shall mean in respect of any Declined Project (i) any Project in which NEER Member had previously presented a Development Notice and NEER Member subsequently revises the associated Development Plan in a Material Manner, or (ii) any new Project(s) utilizing the Transferred Interconnection Assets after the date of transfer from XPLR Member to NEER Member.
5
23504846v1
“XPLR” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“XPLR COD Losses Cap Amount” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.4.
“XPLR Member” shall mean XPLR or any of its Affiliates.
“XPLR Member Percentage Interest” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.
“XPLR Member’s Initial Contribution” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3(b).
“XPLR Member’s Investment Option Rights” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.
“XPLR Parent” means XPLR Infrastructure Partners, L.P.
“XPLR Renewable Projects” shall mean each of XPLR Member’s currently existing and owned renewable energy projects.
“XPLR Third Party Consent Cap Amount” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(b).
2. Designated Co-Investment Opportunities.
2.1 XPLR Member and NEER Member acknowledge and agree that each of the XPLR Renewable Projects set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto are co-investment opportunities (each a “Designated Co-Investment Opportunity”, and collectively the “Designated Co-Investment Opportunities”) and are subject to XPLR Member’s Investment Option Rights set forth in Section 3.
2.2 NEER Member and XPLR Member acknowledge and agree that each Designated Co-Investment Opportunity has been designated for the purpose of developing a Project at each such XPLR Renewable Project site utilizing battery technology (each a “BESS Project” and collectively the “BESS Projects”).
3. XPLR Member’s Investment Option.
3.1 NEER hereby confirms that on the Effective Date, NEER has delivered, or caused to be delivered to XPLR, and XPLR hereby confirms that on the Effective Date, XPLR has received from NEER or a NEER Member, Development Notices in respect of each Designated Co-Development Opportunity, and such Development Notices comply with and satisfy the requirements of a Development Notice.
3.2 XPLR shall have forty-five (45) calendar days from the Effective Date (“Investment Option Period”) to notify NEER Member in writing of (a) its irrevocable election (“XPLR Member’s Investment Option Right”) to invest a specified percentage (“XPLR Member Percentage Interest”) in each Project JV (which XPLR Member Percentage Interest may be different for each Project JV) such that XPLR Member shall hold such specified percentage of the equity interest in one or more of such Project JV, which such percentage shall constitute not less than 25% and not more than 49% of the aggregate equity interest in each such Project JV that will develop, own and operate the associated BESS Project (“Investment Option Exercise Notice”), on the terms set forth herein, or (b) its rejection of the opportunity to participate in the applicable Designated Co-Development Opportunity (a “Designated Co-Development Opportunity Rejection Notice”). If XPLR Member fails to deliver an Investment
6
23504846v1
Option Exercise Notice or a Designated Co-Development Opportunity Rejection Notice prior to the expiration of the Investment Option Period in respect of any Designated Co-Investment Opportunity, then XPLR Member shall be deemed to have rejected its participation in such Designated Co-Investment Opportunity, and Article 4 shall apply with respect to the applicable Interconnection Assets of such Designated Co-Investment Opportunity.
3.3 Upon XPLR Member’s delivery of an Investment Option Exercise Notice:
(a) XPLR shall, and shall cause XPLR Members to, use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all required third party consents, including consents from XPLR Members’ financing sources, to effectuate the sale and transfer of the applicable Interconnection Assets to the relevant Project JV (the “Project Interconnection Assets”);
(b) XPLR shall, and shall cause XPLR Members to, sell and transfer, pursuant to documentation reasonably satisfactory to NEER Member, the Project Interconnection Assets in respect of the applicable Project to the related Project JV (“XPLR Member’s Initial Contribution”) by no later than ninety (90) calendar days from XPLR Member’s delivery of the Investment Option Exercise Notice (the “Required Contribution Date”) in accordance with Section 3.4 below; provided that, the Required Contribution Date, with respect to each applicable Project JV shall be automatically extended until such date that the required third-party consents are obtained, provided that the applicable XPLR Member shall have initiated the process to obtain the third-party consents promptly, and in any event within five (5) Business Days of the Effective Date, and the applicable XPLR Member is using commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such consent during such extension period, but in no event will extend beyond the Outside Contribution Date in respect of each Designated Co-Investment Opportunity; and
(c) XPLR and NEER agree that the value of the applicable Project Interconnection Assets to be sold to the associated Project JV shall be the amount set forth in the “Surplus Interconnection Consideration” column in Exhibit A in respect of each such related Project Interconnection Assets (such amount, the “Surplus Interconnection Consideration”). Following the transfer of the Project Interconnection Assets to the applicable Project JV, such Project Interconnection Assets shall be a Project JV asset.
3.4 Parties’ Responsibilities Upon Exercise of XPLR Member’s Co-Investment Option.
(a) Upon receipt of an Investment Option Exercise Notice and all required third party consents, including consents from XPLR Members’ financing sources, in respect of each applicable Project JV, NEER shall cause the applicable NEER Member to promptly form the related Project JV, and NEER shall cause the applicable NEER Member and XPLR shall cause the applicable XPLR Member to enter into the related Project JV’s limited liability company agreement (“Project JV LLCA”), on terms agreeable to the Parties and consistent in all material respects with the terms set forth on Schedule 1, attached hereto.
7
23504846v1
(b) Promptly following NEER Member and XPLR Member’s execution of the Project JV LLCA, NEER and XPLR shall each cause the applicable NEER Member and the applicable XPLR Member, respectively, to contribute cash to the Project JV in exchange for equity interests in such Project JV such that following the contribution of cash by such XPLR Member, such XPLR Member’s equity ownership interest in the applicable Project JV shall be equal to the XPLR Member Percentage Interest in respect of such Project, and such NEER Member’s equity ownership interest in such Project JV shall be equal to the difference between 100% and the XPLR Member Percentage Interest. The aggregate amount of cash to be contributed by each of the applicable NEER Member and the applicable XPLR Member shall be an amount sufficient for the Project JV to purchase from the applicable XPLR Member the Project JV’s Project Interconnection Assets.
(c) On or prior to the Required Contribution Date (as extended pursuant to Section 3.3(b)), XPLR shall cause the applicable XPLR Member to sell the Project Interconnection Assets to the Project JV, and the Parties will cause the Project JV to purchase from the applicable XPLR Member, for cash, in an amount equal to the Surplus Interconnection Consideration in respect of the applicable Project Interconnection Asset.
(d) On or before the Required Contribution Date (as extended pursuant to Section 3.3(b)), NEER shall cause the applicable NEER Member to contribute to the Project JV the Initial Development Assets in exchange for additional equity interests in the Project JV equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (a) the Initial Development Asset Value, by (b) the sum of the Initial Development Asset Value and the aggregate amount of cash contributed by each of NEER Member and XPLR Member pursuant to Section 3.4(b) above.
3.5 Costs and Expenses.
(a) Following the delivery of the Investment Option Exercise Notice, all costs and expenses for the development, construction and operation of the Project (other than (i) the Third Party Financing Costs (as defined below), which shall be subject to Section 3.5(b), and (ii) any pre-payment of principal or interest on any financing and related fees with respect to Indebtedness, which encumbers the applicable Interconnection Assets that is required to complete XPLR Member’s Initial Contribution, which amounts in clause (ii) shall be borne by the applicable XPLR Member), shall be borne by the Project JV.
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, with respect to any reasonable and documented third-party costs incurred by XPLR Member for XPLR Member to obtain any required third party consents from XPLR Member’s financing sources in connection with the transfer of any Project Interconnection Assets or Transferred Project Interconnection Asset (such costs, the “Third Party Financing Costs”), NEER Member shall bear up to an amount not to exceed $2,500,000 (the “NEER Third Party Consent Cap Amount”), in the aggregate with respect to all consents for the Project Interconnection Assets and the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset; provided that if the Third Party Financing Cost exceeds the NEER Third Party Consent Cap Amount (such excess, the “Excess Third Party Financing
8
23504846v1
Costs”) with respect to the transfer of any Project Interconnection Assets or the Transferred Project Interconnection Assets, XPLR Member shall bear the cost of any such Excess Third Party Financing Costs up to an amount not to exceed $2,500,000 (the “XPLR Third Party Consent Cap Amount”); provided further, if the Excess Third Party Financing Costs exceeds the XPLR Third Party Consent Cap Amount, then NEER and XPLR shall, for a period of thirty (30) calendar days following the determination that the Excess Third Party Financing Costs exceeds the XPLR Third Party Consent Cap Amount, negotiate in good faith to determine whether XPLR will fund the Excess Third Party Financing Costs in excess of the XPLR Third Party Consent Cap Amount, or if XPLR will provide written notice to NEER Member during such thirty (30) day period that it converts its Investment Option Exercise Notice in respect of such Project JV to a Designated Co-Investment Opportunity Rejection Notice and sell the applicable Project Interconnection Asset to NEER Member and treat it as a Declined Project in accordance with Section 4, in which case, notwithstanding the Surplus Interconnection Consideration or the value determined in respect of the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset, as applicable, NEER and XPLR shall negotiate in good faith and mutually agree to a revised Surplus Interconnection Consideration in respect of the applicable Project Interconnection Asset and/or value in respect of the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset, as applicable, and consummate such sale and transfer for the Project Interconnection Assets and/or the Transferred Project Interconnection Assets, in each case, subject to the applicable NEER Member and the applicable XPLR Member obtaining their respective board approvals (including any required independent conflicts committee board approval of the revised Surplus Interconnection Consideration for the applicable Interconnection Assets and/or valuation with respect to the Transferred Project Interconnection Assets). XPLR Member shall keep NEER Member reasonably informed with respect to XPLR Member’s discussions with any third party to obtain any required third party consents, and XPLR Member shall not agree to any Third Party Financing Costs without NEER Member’s prior written consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.
4. NEER Member Purchase Rights for Declined Projects.
4.1 If XPLR or the applicable XPLR Member delivers a Designated Co-Development Opportunity Rejection Notice or fails to issue an Investment Option Exercise Notice for a Designated Co-Investment Opportunity within the applicable Investment Option Period (“Declined Project”), then NEER may elect for a NEER Member to acquire from XPLR Member, and XPLR shall cause the applicable XPLR Member to sell to NEER Member, the associated Interconnection Assets at a valuation equal to the applicable Surplus Interconnection Consideration, plus any applicable Third Party Financing Costs, in accordance with and subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3.5 (“Transferred Interconnection Assets”).
9
23504846v1
4.2 NEER Member shall provide written notice of its election, if any, to acquire the associated Transferred Interconnection Assets (“NEER Election Notice”) within sixty (60) calendar days of NEER Member’s receipt of a Designated Co-Investment Opportunity Rejection Notice (“NEER Election Period”) or at any time after the Investment Option Period with respect to any Designated Co-Development Opportunity if XPLR Member fails to deliver an Investment Option Exercise Notice or a Designated Co-Development Opportunity Rejection Notice in respect of such Designated Co-Investment Opportunity. Following the commencement of the NEER Election Period, if NEER Member declines or fails to issue such NEER Election Notice within the applicable NEER Election Period, then such related Interconnection Assets shall be released to XPLR Member free and clear of this Agreement.
4.3 If XPLR Member receives a NEER Election Notice within the applicable NEER Election Period, then NEER and XPLR shall cause each applicable NEER Member and XPLR Member, respectively, to in good faith cooperate, negotiate and execute definitive agreements to effectuate NEER Member’s acquisition of the applicable Transferred Interconnection Assets (the “Definitive Documents”), which will include but not be limited to the Shared Facilities Agreement and any Required Ancillary Agreements. NEER Member’s and XPLR Member’s execution of any Definitive Documents shall each be subject to NEER Member’s and XPLR Member’s respective receipt of the necessary board approval at or before the next scheduled board meeting; provided that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in the event any of the Designated Co-Investment Opportunities become a Declined Project, XPLR Member shall have obtained the necessary board approval (including any required independent conflicts committee board approval of the Surplus Interconnection Consideration for the applicable Transferred Interconnection Assets) for the sale of such potential Transferred Interconnection Assets for an amount equal to the applicable Surplus Interconnection Consideration, plus any applicable Third Party Financing Costs, in accordance with and subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3.5, during the Investment Option Period, and no further board or independent conflicts committee board approval shall be required in respect thereof in connection with the execution of the Definitive Documents. NEER and XPLR shall cause the applicable NEER Member and the XPLR Member to consummate the sale and transfer of the Transferred Interconnection Assets on or prior to the Outside Contribution Date as set forth in the applicable “Outside Contribution Date” column in Exhibit A.
4.4 Upon NEER Member’s acquisition of the Transferred Interconnection Assets, XPLR Member shall no longer have any interests or rights to the proposed Project or the related Transferred Interconnection Assets other than its Updated Investment Option Rights (defined below) (each such project an “Exclusive NEER Project”).
4.5 NEER Member acknowledges and agrees that any project utilizing the Transferred Interconnection Assets will be subject to certain agreements required by the co-located XPLR Renewable Project (such as a build out agreement or Shared Facilities Agreement) that will dictate that the existing XPLR Renewable Project, or its successors, will have priority of dispatch over any new co-located projects (“Required Ancillary Agreements”).
10
23504846v1
5. XPLR Member Updated Investment Option Rights.
5.1 Commencing on the Effective Date and continuing until the third anniversary of the Effective Date, NEER Member shall be required to present to XPLR Member a Development Notice in respect of any Updated Project and XPLR Member shall have forty-five (45) calendar days from the date of its receipt of such Development Notice (“Updated Investment Option Period”) to notify NEER Member of its irrevocable election, subject to XPLR Member’s receipt of the necessary board approval promptly, to invest an amount equal to the XPLR Member Percentage Interest of such Project JV that will develop and own the Updated Project (“Updated Investment Option Exercise Notice”), on the terms set forth in the Development Notice, this Agreement and in the existing applicable Project JV LLCA (if any) (collectively, the “Updated Investment Option Rights”).
5.2 In connection with a Change of Control of an XPLR Member, (i) XPLR shall cause the applicable XPLR Member to be bound by its obligations under Article 4 and Section 5.1 following such Change of Control transaction and (ii) the rights of XPLR and such XPLR Member shall under Article 4 and Section 5.1 that relate to or arise from such XPLR Member shall terminate in connection with such Change of Control.
6. Transferred Projects.
6.1 Commencing on the Effective Date, in order to assist with XPLR Member’s funding obligations for any potential co-investment obligations, XPLR and NEER shall cause the applicable XPLR Member and NEER Member to effectuate a sale and transfer to NEER Member of the necessary Interconnection Asset from the XPLR Renewable Project listed on Exhibit B attached hereto to enable NEER Member to develop a co-located project exclusively owned and operated by NEER Member at such XPLR Renewable Project site (the “Transferred Project”), which such sale and transfer shall be consummated no later than the Outside Contribution Date. The Transferred Project shall be treated as a Declined Project (but not an Updated Project) and be subject to Article 4; provided that NEER and XPLR hereby agree that the value of the Transferred Project Interconnection Assets shall be the amount set forth in Exhibit B, and to the extent not previously obtained, each of NEER and XPLR shall cause the applicable NEER Member and XPLR Member to obtain their respective board approvals (including any required independent conflicts committee board approval of the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset valuation) for the sale of such Transferred Project Interconnection Asset for the consideration set forth in Exhibit B, plus any applicable Third Party Financing Costs, in accordance with and subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3.5, and XPLR shall cause the applicable XPLR Member to obtain any required third party consents from XPLR Member’s financing sources to effectuate the transfer of the Transfer Project Interconnection Asset to the applicable NEER Member, in each case, on or prior to the applicable Outside Contribution Date.
6.2 XPLR shall cause any XPLR Member that is subject to a Change of Control to be bound by the terms of this Article 6 following the Change of Control.
11
23504846v1
7. Additional Covenants.
7.1 Commencing on the Effective Date and continuing until the earlier of the sale or release of any Interconnection Assets in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, XPLR shall, and shall cause each applicable XPLR Member to, for each XPLR Renewable Project listed on Exhibit A and Exhibit B, maintain any rights it currently has to the related Interconnection Assets. Furthermore, XPLR shall cause the applicable XPLR Member to share all information that NEER Member reasonably requires to develop the Projects, subject to customary confidentiality obligations.
7.2 Commencing on the Effective Date, NEER and XPLR shall use commercially reasonable efforts to identify additional XPLR Renewable Projects to transfer additional Interconnection Rights from XPLR Member to NEER Member to enable up to 500 MWs of surplus projects; provided that the price, timing and structure for completing such transactions for such additional Interconnection Rights, if any, will be subject to (a) the applicable NEER Member and XPLR Member’s receipt of any necessary board approval, and (b) the negotiation and execution of mutually agreeable definitive agreements. XPLR shall cause any XPLR Member that is subject to a Change of Control to be bound by the terms of this Section 7.2 following the Change of Control.
7.3 XPLR and NEER will cause each Project JV to enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement, Administrative Services Agreement, and other ancillary agreements consistent with other projects that NEER (or its Affiliates) operates on behalf of XPLR Member.
7.4 If XPLR Member fails to transfer the applicable Project Interconnection Assets, Transferred Interconnection Assets or the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset, as applicable, on or prior to the Outside Contribution Date in respect of any applicable Project JV, Declined Project or the Transferred Project, XPLR shall be liable to and shall indemnify NEER for COD Losses (taking into account NEER’s indirect ownership of the applicable Project JV) incurred by NEER, NEER Member or Project JV, up to an amount not to exceed $2,500,000, except in the case of fraud, willful misconduct or bad faith by XPLR Member (the “XPLR COD Losses Cap Amount”). In connection with a COD Loss, NEER shall provide prompt written notice (the “Indemnity Notice”) to XPLR setting forth the amount of the COD Losses, without duplication, any NEER Member incurs with respect to a Project or Transferred Project, and subject to the XPLR COD Losses Cap Amount, XPLR shall pay to NEER the amount of such COD Losses set forth in the Indemnity Notice no later than fifteen (15) calendar days of its receipt of such Indemnity Notice.
7.5 As of their relevant transfer date hereunder, XPLR Member will have good and valid title to, or a valid and enforceable interest in, or other right to use, as applicable, the Project Interconnection Assets and the Transferred Project Interconnection Assets, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than clauses (iv), (v) and (vi) of the definition of Permitted Liens.
7.6 XPLR shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause the applicable XPLR Member to transfer all Project Interconnection Assets and the Transferred Project
12
23504846v1
Interconnection Asset requested by NEER in its sole discretion to allow NEER Member or the Project JV, as applicable, to develop and operate the contemplated battery energy storage project.
8. Miscellaneous.
8.1 Confidentiality.
(a) If either Party provides confidential information, including business plans, strategies, financial information, proprietary, patented, licensed, copyrighted or trademarked information, or technical information regarding the Projects or of such Party’s business (“Confidential Information”) to the other or, if, in the course of performing under this Agreement or negotiating this Agreement, a Party learns Confidential Information regarding the facilities or plans of the other, the receiving Party shall: (i) protect the Confidential Information from disclosure to third parties with the same degree of care accorded its own confidential and proprietary information, but in any event not less than a commercially reasonable degree of care; and (ii) refrain from using such Confidential Information, except in the negotiation and performance of this Agreement.
(b) A Party may provide such Confidential Information to its Agents, Affiliates, Financing Parties, and potential Financing Parties; provided that each Party will be responsible for any breach of this Section 8.1 by its Agents, Affiliates, Financing Parties, and potential Financing Parties.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, neither Party will be required to hold confidential any information that: (i) becomes publicly available other than through the receiving Party; (ii) is required to be disclosed by a Governmental Authority under applicable Law or pursuant to a validly issued subpoena; (iii) becomes available to the receiving Party from a source which is not known to the receiving Party to be prohibited from disclosing such information pursuant to a legal, contractual or fiduciary obligation to the disclosing Party; or (iv) information which the receiving Party can demonstrate was legally in its possession prior to disclosure by the disclosing Party.
(d) If the receiving Party is requested or required by legal or regulatory authority to disclose any Confidential Information, the receiving Party shall promptly Notify the disclosing Party of such request or requirement prior to disclosure, if permitted by applicable Law, so that the disclosing Party may seek an appropriate protective order. If a protective order or other remedy is not obtained, the receiving Party may furnish only that portion of the Confidential Information that it reasonably determines, in consultation with its counsel, is consistent with the scope of the subpoena or demand, and to exercise reasonable efforts to obtain assurance that confidential treatment will be accorded such Confidential Information.
(e) The terms of this Agreement, its execution and existence is considered by the Parties to be Confidential Information.
13
23504846v1
8.2 Public Announcements. Neither Party nor any of its Affiliates or Agents shall (orally or in writing) publicly disclose, issue any press release, or make any other public statement, or otherwise communicate with the media, concerning the existence of this Agreement or the subject matter hereof, without the prior written approval of the other Party (which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), except if and to the extent that such Party (based on the reasonable advice of counsel) is required to make any public disclosure or filing (“Required Disclosure”) regarding the subject matter of this Agreement (i) by applicable Law, (ii) pursuant to any rules or regulations of any securities exchange of which the securities of such Party or any of its Affiliates are listed or traded, or (iii) in connection with enforcing its rights under this Agreement. Nothing set forth in this Section 8.2 shall prohibit a Party from publicly disclosing, issuing any press release or making any public statements or communications regarding the subject matter of this Agreement that was previously disclosed or otherwise made public by a Party not in breach of this Section 8.2.
8.3 Representations and Warranties.
(a) Each Party represents and warrants to the other Party that it is a legal entity, duly organized and validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its formation and has the requisite power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) Each Party represents and warrants to the other Party that this Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by such party and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the other Party hereto, constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of such Party, enforceable against such Party in accordance with its and their terms, subject only to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights and to general equity principles.
(c) Each Party represents and warrants to the other Party that neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Party nor the consummation by such Party of the transactions contemplated hereby nor compliance by such Party with any of the provisions hereof shall (1) conflict with or violate any provision of its organizational documents, (2) result in any breach or violation of, or constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become a default) under, or give to others any rights of termination, amendment, acceleration or cancellation of, or result in the creation of a lien on any property or asset of such Party pursuant to any contract to which such Party is a party or by which such Party or any property or asset of such Party is bound or affected, or (3) violate any law or order applicable to such Party or any of its properties or assets.
(d) XPLR represents and warrants to NEER that, as of the Effective Date, the applicable XPLR Member has good and valid title to, or a valid and enforceable interest in, or other right to use, as applicable, the Project Interconnection Assets and the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, other than Permitted Liens.
14
23504846v1
8.4 Limitation of Liability.
(a) IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE OR ENHANCED DAMAGES, LOST PROFITS OR REVENUES OR DIMINUTION IN VALUE, ARISING OUT OF, OR RELATING TO, AND/OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF (A) WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES WERE FORESEEABLE, (B) WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES AND (C) THE LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY (CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) UPON WHICH THE CLAIM IS BASED.
(b) Exceptions. THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION8.4(a) SHALL NOT APPLY TO DAMAGES OR LIABILITIES ARISING FROM:
(i) FRAUD, BAD FAITH, OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF EITHER PARTY IN PERFORMING ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT; AND
(ii) BREACH OF THE CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION8.1.
8.5 Assignment. Neither Party may sell, transfer or assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party in its sole discretion; provided, without the prior consent of (but with notice to) the other Party, a Party may: (a) make an assignment to an Affiliate; (b) make an assignment through merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of such Party’s stock, interests or assets; or (c) assign, collaterally assign or pledge its interests hereunder to a financing party; provided that, subject to Section 5.2, the assignee shall remain subject to and bound by the terms and provisions of this Agreement in connection with any assignment of this Agreement by the assigning party.
8.6 Relationship of the Parties.Each Party is an independent contractor with regard to this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as creating any agency, partnership, joint venture, or other form of joint enterprise, employment, or fiduciary relationship between the Parties. Neither Party, by virtue of this Agreement, will have any right, power, or authority to act or create an obligation, express or implied, on behalf of the other Party.
8.7 Dispute Resolution. In the event of any dispute, controversy, or claim between the Parties and which arises out of or relates to this Agreement (each, a “Dispute”), the Parties shall attempt to resolve such Dispute through senior management negotiations. Either Party may, by Notice to the other Party, request a meeting to initiate negotiations to be held at a mutually agreed time and place (either in person or by phone) within ten (10) Business Days after the other Party’s receipt of such request. If the Dispute has not been resolved by senior management within thirty (30) days after commencement of such senior management negotiations (“Senior Management Negotiation Period”), either Party may pursue any and all
15
23504846v1
available remedies under the terms of this Agreement or at applicable Law. The Parties shall attempt to resolve all Disputes promptly, equitably and in good faith.
8.8 Term, Termination, and Survival.
(a) This Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall continue thereafter until the third (3rd) anniversary of the Effective Date, unless sooner terminated pursuant to Section 8.8(b) or Section 8.8(c) (“Term”).
(b) The Parties may terminate this Agreement upon signed mutual consent.
(c) Either Party may terminate this Agreement, effective upon written notice to the other Party (the “Defaulting Party”) if the Defaulting Party:
(i) Materially breaches this Agreement, and such breach is incapable of cure, or with respect to a material breach capable of cure, the Defaulting Party does not cure such breach within 30 days after receipt of written notice of such breach.
(ii) Becomes insolvent or admits its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due.
(iii) Becomes subject, voluntarily or involuntarily, to any proceeding under any domestic or foreign bankruptcy or insolvency law, which is not fully stayed within seven (7) business days or is not dismissed or vacated within forty-five (45) business days after filing.
(iv) Is dissolved or liquidated or takes any corporate action for such purpose.
(v) Makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors.
(vi) Has a receiver, trustee, custodian, or similar agent appointed by order of any court of competent jurisdiction to take charge of or sell any material portion of its property or business.
(d) Any right or obligation of the Parties in this Agreement which, by its nature, should survive termination or expiration of this Agreement, will survive any such termination or expiration of this Agreement.
8.9 Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other term or provision of this Agreement or invalidate or render unenforceable such term or provision in any other jurisdiction. Upon a determination that any term or provision is invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the Parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to/the court may modify this Agreement to effect the original intent of the Parties as closely as possible in order that the transactions contemplated hereby be consummated as originally contemplated to the greatest extent possible.
16
23504846v1
8.10 Waiver. No waiver by either Party of any of the provisions hereof shall be effective unless explicitly set forth in writing and signed by the Party so waiving. No waiver by either Party shall operate or be construed as a waiver in respect of any failure, breach, or default not expressly identified by such written waiver, whether of a similar or different character, and whether occurring before or after that waiver. No failure to exercise, or delay in exercising, any right, remedy, power, or privilege arising from this Agreement shall operate or be construed as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, remedy, power, or privilege hereunder preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy, power, or privilege.
8.11 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with the all related Exhibits, constitute the sole and entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and therein, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous understandings, agreements, representations, and warranties, both written and oral, with respect to the subject matter. In the event of any inconsistency between the statements in the body of this Agreement, any other documents incorporated herein by reference, and the related Exhibits, the statements in the body of this Agreement shall control. The Parties have not relied on any statement, representation, warranty, or agreement of the other Party or of any other person on such Party's behalf, including any representations, warranties, or agreements arising from statute or otherwise in law, except for the representations, warranties, or agreements expressly contained in this Agreement.
8.12 No Oral Amendments. No amendment to this Agreement is effective unless it is in writing, identified as an amendment to this Agreement and signed by an authorized representative of each Party.
8.13 Notice. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered, sent by recognized overnight courier, sent by email, or mailed by registered or certified mail, postage and fees prepaid, to the Party to be notified at the Party’s address shown below. Notices which are hand delivered or delivered by recognized overnight courier shall be effective on delivery or if not delivered on a Business Day on the next Business Day. Notices which are sent by email shall be effective on the day received if received during business hours in the locale of the recipient and otherwise on the next Business Day. Notices which are mailed shall be effective on the third day after mailing.
If to XPLR (or an XPLR Member):
XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP
700 Universe Blvd.
Juno Beach, Florida 33408
Attn: Alan Liu, President and CEO and David Flechner, General Counsel
Email: alan.liu@xplrinfrastructure.com; david.flechner@xplrinfrastructure.com
17
23504846v1
If to NEER:
NextEra Energy Resources, LLC
700 Universe Blvd.
Juno Beach, Florida 33408
Attn: General Counsel
Email: NEER-General-Counsel.sharedmailbox@nee.com
8.14 Choice of Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the domestic laws of the State of New York without reference to any choice of law principles except for Sections 5-1401 and 5-1402 of the New York General Obligations Law. Any legal action or proceeding with respect to or arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in or removed to the courts of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York or, if such court lacks or declines jurisdiction, the courts of the State of New York in the Borough of Manhattan, to the exclusion of all other courts. EACH PARTY CONSENTS AND AGREES THAT ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE BROUGHT IN AND ONLY IN SUCH COURTS AND WAIVES (TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW) ANY OBJECTION THAT IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE VENUE OF ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN ANY SUCH COURT OR THAT SUCH ACTION OR DISPUTE WAS BROUGHT IN AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR ANY SIMILAR OBJECTION AND AGREES NOT TO PLEAD OR CLAIM THE SAME.
8.15 Waiver of Jury Trial. TO THE EXTENT ENFORCEABLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, EACH PARTY KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY, AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHTS THEY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION BASED HEREON, OR ARISING OUT OF, UNDER, OR IN CONNECTION WITH, THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY COURSE OF CONDUCT, COURSE OF DEALING, STATEMENTS (WHETHER VERBAL OR WRITTEN), OR ACTIONS OF EITHER PARTY. THIS PROVISION IS A MATERIAL INDUCEMENT FOR SELLER TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT.
8.16 Specific Performance: Each Party agrees that the other Party would be damaged irreparably and would have no adequate remedy at law in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are not performed in accordance with their specific terms or are otherwise breached. Accordingly, each Party shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement by the other Party and to enforce specifically this Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof, this being in addition to any other remedies to which such Party is entitled at law or in equity, without proof of actual damages or any obligation to post any bond or other security as a prerequisite to obtaining equitable relief. Each Party agrees not to dispute or resist any such application for relief on the basis that another Party has an adequate remedy at law or that damage arising from such non-performance or breach is not irreparable.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
18
23504846v1
Docusign Envelope ID: B92E3DBE-8F96-42DF-8A04-BD2C1149A179
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.
| NEXTERA ENERGY RESOURCES<br><br>DEVELOPMENT, LLC | XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE<br><br>OPERATING PARTNERS, LP | |
|---|---|---|
| DocuSigned by: | ||
| By: | PETTER SKANTZE | By: XPLR Infrastructure Operating |
| 2F5BBE5FF6D34D9... | Partners GP, LLC, its general partner | |
| Name: | Petter Skantze | |
| Title: | Vice President | |
| By________________________ | ||
| Name: | ||
| Title: |
[Signature Page to Interconnection Sales and Co-Investment Agreement]
23504846v1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.
| NEXTERA ENERGY RESOURCES<br><br>DEVELOPMENT, LLC | XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE<br><br>OPERATING PARTNERS, LP |
|---|---|
| By________________________ | By: XPLR Infrastructure Operating |
| Name: | Partners GP, LLC, its general partner |
| Title: | |
| By S. ALAN LIU | |
| Name: S. Alan Liu | |
| Title: President |
[Signature Page to Interconnection Sales and Co-Investment Agreement]
23504846v1
EXHIBIT A
DESIGNATED CO-INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
| Existing <br>Project | Designated <br>Co-Investment Project | Location (State) | Expected BESS COD | BESS Capacity in MW [ac] | Outside Contribution Date | Governmental Approval Deadline | Surplus Interconnection Consideration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carousel Wind | Carousel BESS | CO | 12/30/2027 | 149.6 | August 31, 2026 | September 30, 2026 | $12,641,960 |
| Mammoth Plains Wind | Mammoth Plains BESS | OK | 11/15/2027 | 150.0 | August 31, 2026 | February 28, 2027 | $12,927,645 |
| Roswell Solar | Roswell BESS | NM | 11/15/2027 | 50.0 | October 30, 2026 | February 28, 2027 | $2,181,630 |
| Chaves Solar | Chaves BESS | NM | 11/15/2027 | 50.0 | October 30, 2026 | February 28, 2027 | $3,016,872 |
[Exhibit A]
23504846v1
EXHIBIT B
TRANSFERRED PROJECTS
| Existing <br>Project | Transferred Project | Location (State) | Expected BESS COD | BESS Capacity in MW [ac] | Outside Contribution Date | Governmental Approval Deadline | Value of the Transferred Project Interconnection Asset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Duro Wind | Palo Duro BESS | TX | 11/15/2027 | 150 | August 31, 2026 | February 28, 2027 | $13,578,528 |
[Exhibit B]
23504846v1
SCHEDULE 1
PROJECT JV LLCA TERMS
| Project JV LLCA Terms | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Project JVs | Each Project JV shall be governed by an applicable Project JV LLCA, to be negotiated by the parties, and will specifically include the terms set forth in this Schedule 1. |
| 2. | Governance | Each Project JV shall be member-managed, with NEER Member acting as the Project JV’s manager (“Managing Member”).<br><br>1The Managing Member shall be responsible for all activity required to develop, finance, construct, operate and maintain the associated Project owned by the particular Project JV. As compensation for its development services, each Project JV will pay the Managing Member a fee equal to the amounts listed on the Managing Member Fee column in Schedule 1-Exhibit A upon commercial operations of the associated Project (the “Managing Member Fee”).<br><br>XPLR Member’s consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) shall be required for the following specified set of Project JV actions (“Major Decisions”):<br><br>• Any amendment to the Project JV LLCA that is material and adverse to XPLR Member;<br><br>• Borrowing money, and as applicable grant security therefore, to mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any and all assets of the Project JV, including the rights of the Project JV under any agreements, including tax equity financing;<br><br>• Elect to terminate, dissolve or wind up the Project JV;<br><br>• Cause the Project JV to take or file any action or institute any proceeding to declare itself bankrupt;<br><br>• Merge or consolidate the Project JV or convert the Project JV to any other form of business organization;<br><br>• Issue or cause to be issued any additional equity interest, other than in connection with additional capital contributions as contemplated by this Schedule 1; |
| __________________________<br><br>1NTD: Managing Member Fee mechanics, calculation, amounts, and responsible party (payor) is under review;<br><br>Parties to discuss; further comment reserved. |
[Schedule 1]
23504846v1
| • Transfer, sell or dispose of all or substantially all of the assets of the Project JV, other than as authorized in the Project JV LLCA;<br><br>• Admit a new Member to the Project JV, other than as expressly authorized in the Project JV LLCA;<br><br>• Commence, settle and/or terminate any claim, action or proceeding in an amount in excess of $1,000,000;<br><br>• Approving any amendment to an Annual Budget that (i) exceeds any line item by more than ten percent (10%) or (ii) in the aggregate would increase the Annual Budget by more than ten percent (10%);<br><br>• Take any action that would reasonably be expected to (i) adversely affect in any material respect the tax liabilities or tax and financial positions of the Project JV, or (ii) cause the Project JV to be treated as other than a disregarded entity or a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3. | Capital Contributions | Subject to the Budgeting provisions below, and following NEER Member and XPLR Member holding their respective targeted equity ownership percentages in the applicable Project JV, XPLR Member and NEER Member shall each make capital contributions into each Project JV pro rata based on their respective equity interests in the applicable Project JV to pay for Project JV costs approved by the Members.<br><br>All capital calls must be funded by XPLR Member and NEER Member in cash on a pro rata basis. If either party does not contribute, the other party has the right, but not the obligation, to fund on the non-funding party’s behalf and ownership interest will be adjusted in accordance with the Project JV LLCA terms. Failure to fund mechanics, including member loans and dilution shall be set forth in the Project JV’s LLCA. |
| 4. | Governmental Approvals | (i) The Project JV shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all required governmental approvals to develop, construct and operate each Designated Co-Investment Opportunity; provided that if the Project JV is unable to obtain such required governmental approval in respect of any specific Designated Co-Investment Opportunity on or prior to such date set forth in the Governmental Approval Deadline column of Exhibit A to the Agreement, in respect of each such Designated Co-Investment Opportunity, the applicable Project JV shall (a) sell to XPLR Member the related Project Interconnection Assets for an amount equal to the Surplus Interconnection Consideration, (b) sell to NEER Member the related Initial Development Assets for an amount equal to the Individual Development Asset Value, and (c) following the satisfaction of all outstanding debts and liabilities to third parties, distribute the remaining assets to each of NEER Member and XPLR Member in accordance with such member’s percentage interest in such Project JV. |
23504846v1
| 5. | Budgets | Spending by any Project JV shall be subject to annual budgets for development costs, construction costs, and operation costs (“Annual Budgets”).<br><br>An initial budget for any spending by the Project JV shall be attached to the Project JV’s LLCA. |
|---|---|---|
| 6. | Transfer Rights and Restrictions | Transfer Restrictions: No Member may transfer (directly or indirectly, whether voluntarily, involuntarily, by operation of law or otherwise) all or any portion of its equity interests, including the rights to the cash flows generated by the Project JV’s assets (“Transfer”), and no Member may be Transferred, without the prior written consent of the other Member other than as expressly authorized by the Project JV LLCA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) a Member may transfer its equity interests to an Affiliate of such Member (a “Permitted Transferee”); provided that (i) such Transferee agrees in writing to be bound by the Project JV LLCA, and (ii) any such transfer to the Permitted Transferee shall be for not less than 25% of the aggregate equity interests issued and outstanding in the applicable Project JV, and (b) in connection with a Transfer that is permitted pursuant to the terms of the Project JV LLCA, no separate member consent shall be required to admit such transferee as a member of such Project JV.<br><br>ROFR: The Members expressly acknowledge and agree that the existing ROFR terms between XPLR Infrastructure, LP and NextEra Energy Resources, LLC, shall apply to the equity interests held in the Project JV. |
23504846v1
| 7. | Books and Records | The Project JV will maintain its respective books and records in accordance with applicable laws and governance practices.<br><br>Each Member in good standing and not being in default, will have customary information rights with respect to the Project JV, including without limitation:<br><br>1. Quarterly (and if prepared, monthly) unaudited financial statements prepared in the ordinary course of business<br><br>2. Audited annual financial statements<br><br>3. Annual business plans and budgets<br><br>4. Prior to commercial operations date, quarterly updates with respect to the status of development or construction of any Project (including reconciliation of actual against budgeted costs and expenses)<br><br>5. Copies of any periodic reporting or notice of material events provided by any contractor or service provider to any Project JV<br><br>6. Other reasonable access to information |
|---|---|---|
| 8. | Governing Law | Delaware |
23504846v1
SCHEDULE 1 – EXHIBIT A
Managing Member Fee
| Designated Co-Investment Project | Managing Member Fee |
|---|---|
| Carousel BESS | $9,724,000 |
| Mammoth Plains BESS | $9,750,000 |
| Roswell BESS | $3,250,000 |
| Chaves BESS | $3,250,000 |
23504846v1
Document
Exhibit 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF XPLR INFRASTRUCTURE, LP
XPLR Infrastructure, LP’s principal subsidiaries as of December 31, 2025 are listed below.
| Subsidiary | State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |
|---|---|
| XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners GP, LLC | Delaware |
| XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP(a) | Delaware |
____________________
(a) Includes 209 subsidiaries that operate in the United States in the same line of business as XPLR Infrastructure Operating Partners, LP.
Document
Exhibit 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 333-197468 and 333-282801 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-205486, 333-270508, 333-275475 and 333-281227 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 17, 2026, relating to the consolidated financial statements of XPLR Infrastructure, LP and subsidiaries (XPLR) and the effectiveness of XPLR's internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of XPLR for the year ended December 31, 2025.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boca Raton, Florida
February 17, 2026
Document
Exhibit 31(a)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
I, S. Alan Liu, certify that:
1.I have reviewed this Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2025 of XPLR Infrastructure, LP (the registrant);
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: | February 17, 2026 | | --- | --- || S. ALAN LIU | | --- | | S. Alan Liu<br><br>President and Chief Executive Officer<br><br>of XPLR Infrastructure, LP |
Document
Exhibit 31(b)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
I, Jessica Geoffroy, certify that:
1.I have reviewed this Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2025 of XPLR Infrastructure, LP (the registrant);
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: | February 17, 2026 | | --- | --- || JESSICA GEOFFROY | | --- | | Jessica Geoffroy<br><br>Chief Financial Officer<br><br>of XPLR Infrastructure, LP |
Document
Exhibit 32
Section 1350 Certification
We, S. Alan Liu and Jessica Geoffroy, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)The Annual Report on Form 10-K of XPLR Infrastructure, LP (the registrant) for the annual period ended December 31, 2025 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| Dated: | February 17, 2026 | | --- | --- || S. ALAN LIU | | --- | | S. Alan Liu<br><br>President and Chief Executive Officer<br><br>of XPLR Infrastructure, LP | | JESSICA GEOFFROY | | --- | | Jessica Geoffroy<br><br>Chief Financial Officer<br><br>of XPLR Infrastructure, LP |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).