Woodbridge Liquidation Trust 10-Q for FY2024 Q2
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust (WBQNL)
10-Q
2024-02-12
For: 2023-12-31
View Original
Added on
April 06, 2026
About this 10-Q
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust filed this 10-Q on February 12, 2024, covering the quarter ended December 31, 2023 (FY2024 Q2).
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2023
or
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ______ to _____
Commission File Number: 000-56115
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employment Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310 ) 765-1550
201 N. Brand Blvd., Suite M, Glendale, CA 91203
(Former address, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated filer ☐
|
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No ☒
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust
Form 10-Q
December 31, 2023
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||
|
Item 1.
|
|||
|
1
|
|||
|
2
|
|||
|
3
|
|||
|
4
|
|||
|
Item 2.
|
20
|
||
|
Item 3.
|
31
|
||
|
Item 4.
|
31
|
||
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
|
Item 1.
|
32
|
||
|
Item 1A.
|
39
|
||
|
Item 2.
|
39
|
||
|
Item 3.
|
39
|
||
|
Item 4.
|
39
|
||
|
Item 5.
|
39
|
||
|
Item 6.
|
40
|
||
| PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
| Item 1. |
Financial Statements
|
|
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation
As of December 31, 2023
and June 30, 2023
|
|
($ In Thousands)
|
|
|
12/31/2023
(Unaudited)
|
6/30/2023
|
||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
|
$ |
|
||||
|
Restricted cash (Note 3)
|
|
|||||||
|
Other assets (Note 4)
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Distributions payable
|
|
|
||||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs (Note 5)
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$ | $ | ||||||
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)
|
||||||||
|
Net Assets in Liquidation
|
||||||||
|
Restricted for Qualifying Victims (Note 6)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
All Interestholders
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total net assets in liquidation
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
| PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
|
| Item 1. |
Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Net Assets in Liquidation
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022
|
|
(Unaudited, $ in Thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2023
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2022
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted
For Qualifying
Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
Restricted
For Qualifying
Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Assets in Liquidation as of beginning of period
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$ | $ | ||||||||||||||
|
Change in assets and liabilities (Note 7):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted for Qualifying Victims -
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
All Interestholders -
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Net change in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Assets in Liquidation as of end of period
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
| PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
|
| Item 1. |
Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022
|
|
(Unaudited, $ in Thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended December 31, 2023
|
Six Months Ended December 31, 2022
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted
For Qualifying
Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
Restricted
For Qualifying
Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Assets in Liquidation as of beginning of period
|
$ |
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$ | $ | |||||||||||||||
|
Change in assets and liabilities (Note 7):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted for Qualifying Victims -
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
All Interestholders -
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Net change in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Assets in Liquidation as of end of period
|
$
|
|
$ |
$
|
|
$
|
|
$ | $ | |||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
|
1)
|
Formation and Description of Business
|
Formation
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust (the “Trust”) was established (i) for the purpose of collecting, administering, distributing and liquidating the Trust assets for the benefit of the Trust beneficiaries in
accordance with the Liquidation Trust Agreement of the Trust and the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation of Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC and its Affiliated Debtors dated August 22, 2018 (as amended, modified, supplemented or
restated from time to time, the “Plan”); (ii) to resolve disputed claims asserted against the Debtors; (iii) to litigate and/or settle causes of action (“Causes of Action”); and (iv) to pay certain allowed claims and statutory fees, as required
by the Plan. Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC and its affiliated debtors are individually referred to herein as a Debtor and collectively as the Debtors. The Trust was formed on February 15, 2019 (the “Plan Effective Date”) as a statutory trust
under Delaware law.
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, (a) the following assets automatically vested in the Trust: (i) an aggregate $5,000,000 in cash from the Debtors for the purpose of funding the Trust’s initial expenses of operation; (ii) certain claims and Causes of Action; (iii)
all of the outstanding equity interests of the Wind-Down Entity (as defined below); and (iv) certain other non-real estate related assets, (b) the equity interests of Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC and Woodbridge Mortgage Investment Fund 1, LLC
(together, the “Remaining Debtors”) were cancelled and new equity interests representing all of the newly issued and outstanding equity interests in the Remaining Debtors were issued to the Trust, (c) all of the other Debtors other than the
Remaining Debtors were dissolved and (d) the real estate-related assets of the Debtors were automatically vested in the Trust’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC (the “Wind-Down Entity”) or one of the Wind-Down Entity’s 43 wholly-owned single member LLCs (the “Wind-Down Subsidiaries”) formed to own the respective real estate assets. The Trust, the Remaining Debtors, the Wind-Down Entity and the
Wind-Down Subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as the “Company.”
As further discussed in Note 8, the Trust
has two classes of liquidation trust interests, Class A Liquidation Trust Interests (“Class A Interests”) and Class B Liquidation Trust
Interests (“Class B Interests”). The holders of Class A Interests and Class B Interests are collectively referred to as “All Interestholders.”
On December 24, 2019, the
Trust’s Registration Statement on Form 10 became effective under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The trading symbol for the Trust’s Class A Interests is WBQNL. Bid and asked prices for the Trust’s Class A Interests are
quoted on the OTC Link ATS, the SEC-registered alternative trading system. The Class A Interests are eligible for the Depository Trust Company’s Direct Registration System (“DRS”) services. The Class B Interests
are not registered with the SEC.
The Trust will be
terminated upon the first to occur of (i) the making of all distributions required to be made and a determination by the Liquidation Trustee that the pursuit of additional causes of action held by the Trust is not justified or (ii) February 15,
2024, subject to an extension of the term if approved by the Bankruptcy Court as necessary to facilitate or complete the recovery on, and liquidation of, the Trust assets which was approved on December 20, 2023 (see below).
During the year ended
June 30, 2023, the Company concluded that its liquidation activities would not be completed by February 15, 2024, which was the original outside termination date of the Trust, for a number of reasons. First, there had been significant delays in
certain legal proceedings where the Company is the plaintiff. Second, a construction defect claim was asserted against one of the Wind-Down Subsidiaries by the buyer of one of the subsidiary’s single-family homes. The subsidiary has tendered the
claim to its insurance carriers; however, the carriers have not yet accepted the claim. At this time, the amount of the liability exposure has not been determined and the subsidiary’s exposure is unknown. The subsidiary is investigating the
claim, including the extent and causes of the alleged damage and the identification of other potentially responsible persons. Based on the foregoing, the Company currently projects a revised estimated completion date for the Company’s operations
of approximately March 31, 2026.
4
The
Company filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court to extend the termination date of the Trust from February 15, 2024 through and including March 31, 2026. On December 20, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court granted the Company’s motion to extend the
termination date through and including March 31, 2026, as requested by the Trust.
Description of
Business
The Company is required to liquidate its assets and distribute available cash to the Trust
beneficiaries. The liquidation activities are carried out by the Trust, the Wind-Down Entity and the Wind-Down Subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2023, the Company presently estimates that the liquidation activities will be completed by
approximately March 31, 2026.
The Trust is
prosecuting various Causes of Action acquired by the Trust pursuant to the Plan and is resolving claims asserted against the Debtors. As of December 31, 2023, the Company is the plaintiff in several pending lawsuits. During the three months
ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded settlement recoveries of approximately $82 ,000 and $41 ,000, respectively, and during the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded settlement recoveries of approximately $34,510 ,000 and $231 ,000,
respectively, from the settlement of Causes of Action (see Note 11 for additional information). The Company also recorded liabilities of 5 %
of the settlement recoveries as amounts payable to the Liquidation Trustee. The Company has accrued an estimate of the amount of legal costs to be incurred to pursue the remaining Causes of Action, excluding contingent fees. As more fully
discussed in Note 2, the Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any estimate of future net recoveries from litigation and settlement, since the Company cannot reasonably estimate them.
The Wind-Down
Entities’ operations are almost complete. As of December 31, 2023, the Wind-Down Subsidiaries owned one performing secured loan and one single-family home subject to a life estate (see Note 4 for additional information).
As more fully discussed in Note 2, the Company uses the Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The Trust currently operates as one reportable segment. Net assets in liquidation represent the remaining estimated aggregate value available to Trust beneficiaries upon liquidation, with no discount for
the timing of proceeds (undiscounted). Net liquidation proceeds, other recoveries and actual liquidation costs may differ materially from the estimated amounts due to the uncertainty in the timing of completing the liquidation activities.
The Trust’s expectations about the amount of any additional distributions, if any, and when they will be paid are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based on certain estimates and assumptions, one or more of which
may prove to be incorrect. As a result, the actual amount of any additional distributions may differ materially, perhaps in adverse ways, from the Trust estimates. Furthermore, it is not possible to predict the timing of any additional
distributions and any such distributions may not be made within the timing referenced, if any, in the consolidated financial statements.
No assurance can
be given that total distributions will equal or exceed the estimate of net assets in liquidation presented in the consolidated statements of net assets in liquidation.
| 2) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the
consolidated financial statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the results for such periods. These consolidated
financial statements have been presented in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 205-30, “Liquidation Basis of Accounting,” as amended by Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial
Statements (Topic 205), Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The June 30, 2023 consolidated statement of net assets in liquidation included herein was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures or
notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.
5
All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and for the period then ended. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the carrying amounts
of assets and liabilities are revised in the period that available information supports a change in the carrying amount.
Liquidation Basis of Accounting
Under the liquidation basis of accounting, all assets are
recorded at their estimated net realizable value or liquidation value, which represents the estimated amount of net cash that will be received upon the disposition of the assets (on an undiscounted basis). The measurement of real estate assets
was based on current contracts (if any), if contingencies have been removed, estimates and other indications of sales value, net of estimated selling costs.
Liabilities, including estimated costs associated with
implementing and completing the Plan, are measured in accordance with U.S. GAAP that otherwise applies to those liabilities. The Company has recorded estimated development costs such as costs to be incurred to prepare the assets for sale,
estimated reserves for contingent liabilities including potential construction defect claims and the estimated general and administrative costs to be incurred until the completion of the liquidation of the Company. When estimating development
costs, the Company considered estimates of costs to complete punch list items and to address potential construction defect claims and other costs. Projected general and administrative cost estimates take into account operating costs through the
completion of the liquidation of the Company, currently estimated to be approximately March 31, 2026, and an accrual for the administration of potential construction defect claims.
These estimated amounts are presented in the accompanying
consolidated statements of net assets in liquidation. All changes in the estimated liquidation value of the Company’s real estate or other assets and liabilities are reflected as a change to the Company’s net assets in liquidation.
On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the estimated net
realizable values, liquidation costs and the estimated date of the completion of the liquidation of the Company and records any significant changes. If the Company has a change in its plan for the disposition of an asset, the carrying value will be
adjusted to reflect this change in the period that the change is approved. The change in value may include the accrued liquidation costs related to the asset.
Other Assets
The Company recognizes recoveries from the settlement of unresolved Causes of Action when an agreement is executed, final court
approval is received (if required), and collectability is reasonably assured. The amount recovered may be material to the Company’s net assets in liquidation.
6
An allowance for uncollectible settlement installment receivables is recorded when there is doubt about the collectability of the
receivable. The Company records escrow receivables at the amount that is expected to be received when the escrow receivable is released. The Forfeited Assets (Note 6) received from the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), other than
cash, have been recorded at their estimated net realizable value. The Company accrues expected interest earnings when it can reasonably estimate the amount to be received.
In addition, the Company recognizes other amounts to be received based on contractual terms or when the amounts to be received are
certain.
Accrued Liquidation Costs
The Company accrues estimated liquidation costs to the
extent they are reasonably determinable. These costs consist of (a) estimated development costs including the costs to complete punch list items, bond refunds and estimated reserves for contingent liabilities including potential construction
defect claims and other costs and (b) estimated general and administrative costs including payroll, legal and other professional fees, trustee and board fees, rent and other office related expenses, and other general and administrative costs to
operate the Company and the administration of construction defect claims.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers short-term investments that have a maturity date of 90 days or less at the time of investment to be a cash equivalent.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes cash that can only be used for certain specified purposes as described in Note 3.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, which are held as
deposits in several financial institutions. The deposit balances in any one financial institution may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) insurance limits. The Company mitigates this risk by using sweep accounts to
reduce deposit balances at any one financial institution consistent with FDIC insurance limits.
Income Taxes
The Trust is intended to be treated as a grantor trust for income tax purposes and, accordingly, is not subject to federal or state income tax on
any income earned or gain recognized by the Trust. The Trust’s beneficiaries will be treated as the owner of a pro rata portion of each asset, including cash and each liability received by and held by the Trust. Each beneficiary will be required to
report on his or her federal and state income tax return his or her pro rata share of taxable income, including gains and losses recognized by the Trust. Accordingly, there is no provision for federal or state income taxes recorded in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The Company regularly analyzes its various federal and state filing positions and only recognizes the income tax effect in the consolidated
financial statements when certain criteria regarding uncertain income tax positions have been met. The Company believes that its income tax positions would more likely than not be sustained upon examination by all relevant taxing authorities.
Therefore, no provision for uncertain income tax positions has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
Net Assets in Liquidation - Restricted
for Qualifying Victims
The Company separately
presents the portion of net assets in liquidation that are restricted for Qualifying Victims (see Note 6) from the net assets in liquidation that are available to All Interestholders.
7
Reclassifications
The Company has reclassified certain
amounts related to its prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to its current period presentation.
| 3) |
Restricted Cash
|
The Company’s restricted cash as of December 31, 2023 (unaudited), with comparative information as of June 30, 2023, is as follows ($ in thousands):
|
December 31, 2023
|
June 30, 2023
|
|||||||
| Forfeited Assets (Note 6) | $ | $ | ||||||
|
Distributions restricted by the Company related to unresolved claims, distributions for recently allowed claims, uncashed distribution checks, distributions withheld due to pending
avoidance actions and distributions that the Trust is waiting for further beneficiary information
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total restricted cash
|
$ | $ | ||||||
| 4) |
Other Assets
|
The Company’s other assets as of December 31, 2023 (unaudited), with comparative information as of June 30, 2023, are as follows ($ in thousands):
|
December 31, 2023
|
June 30, 2023
|
|||||||
| Accrued interest (a) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Real estate assets, net (b) | ||||||||
|
Forfeited Assets (Note 6) (a)
|
|
|||||||
| Settlement receivables, net (c) |
||||||||
| Escrow receivable (d) |
||||||||
|
Other
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total other assets
|
$
|
|
$ | |||||
| (a) |
|
8
| (b) |
|
| (c) |
|
| (d) |
|
| 5) |
Accrued Liquidation Costs
|
The following is a summary of the items included in accrued liquidation costs as of December 31, 2023 (unaudited), with comparative information as of June 30, 2023 ($ in
thousands):
|
December 31, 2023
|
June 30, 2023
|
|||||||
|
Development and holding costs
|
$ | $ | ||||||
|
General and administrative costs:
|
||||||||
|
Legal and other professional fees
|
|
|
||||||
|
Directors and officers insurance
|
||||||||
|
Payroll and payroll-related
|
|
|
||||||
|
Board fees and expenses
|
|
|
||||||
|
Other
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total general and administrative costs
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total accrued liquidation costs
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
6)
|
Forfeited Assets - Restricted for Qualifying Victims
|
The Trust entered into a resolution agreement with the DOJ which provided that the Trust would receive the assets
forfeited (“Forfeited Assets”) by Robert and Jeri Shapiro. The agreement provided for the release of specified Forfeited Assets by the DOJ to the Trust and for the Trust to liquidate those assets and distribute the net sale proceeds to Qualifying
Victims. Qualifying Victims include the vast majority of Trust beneficiaries (specifically, all former holders of allowed Class 3 and 5 claims and their permitted assigns), but do not include former holders of Class 4 claims. Distributions to
Qualifying Victims are to be allocated pro-rata based on their net allowed claims without considering the (i) 5 % enhancement for
contributing their causes of action and (ii) 72.5 % Class 5 coefficient.
9
In March 2021, the Trust received certain Forfeited Assets from the DOJ, including cash, wine, jewelry, handbags, clothing, shoes, art, gold and
other assets. The Company recorded the total estimated net realizable value of the Forfeited Assets of approximately $3,459 ,000. During
the three and six months ended December 31, 2023, the Company sold the handbags and some of the jewelry and art. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2022, the Company sold the automobile, and some of the jewelry, handbags, clothing,
shoes and art. The Forfeited Assets included in the Company’s December 31, 2023 (unaudited) and June 30, 2023 consolidated financial statements are as follows ($ in thousands):
|
December 31, 2023
|
June 30, 2023
|
|||||||
|
Restricted cash (Note 3)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Other assets (Note 4)
|
|
|
||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs - primarily legal and professional fees
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Net assets in liquidation - restricted for Qualifying Victims
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
On February 7,
2023, the Trust was informed that the DOJ had received additional Forfeited Assets from a co-defendant of Robert Shapiro and that the DOJ proposes to transfer these Forfeited Assets to the Trust. On December 12, 2023, the DOJ granted the
Trust’s petition for remittance of the additional Forfeited Assets. At this time, the Trust is unable to estimate the precise amount or timing of the transfer of any such Forfeited Assets and, therefore, the above table excludes such future
proceeds. The proceeds from any additional Forfeited Assets would be distributed to Qualifying Victims.
|
7)
|
Net Change in Assets and Liabilities
|
Restricted for Qualifying Victims:
The following provides details of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net during the three months ended December 31, 2023 ($ in thousands) (unaudited):
| Cash | Remeasure- | |||||||||||
|
Activities
|
ment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
|
Restricted cash
|
||||||||||||
|
Other assets
|
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ |
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs
|
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
10
The following provides details of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net during the three months ended December 31, 2022
($ in thousands) (unaudited):
| Cash | Remeasure- | |||||||||||
|
Activities
|
ment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
|
Restricted cash
|
||||||||||||
|
Other assets
|
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ |
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs
|
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
The following provides details of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net during the six months ended December 31, 2023 ($ in
thousands) (unaudited):
|
Cash
|
Remeasure-
|
|||||||||||
|
Activities
|
ment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
11
The following provides details of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net during the six months ended December 31, 2022 ($ in
thousands) (unaudited):
|
Cash
|
Remeasure-
|
|||||||||||
|
Activities
|
ment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
All Interestholders
The following provides details of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net during the three months ended December
31, 2023 ($ in thousands) (unaudited):
| Cash | Remeasure- | |||||||||||
|
Activities
|
ment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
(
|
)
|
( |
) | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
The following provides details of the distributions (declared) reversed, net during the three months ended December 31, 2023 ($ in thousands) (unaudited):
|
Distributions declared
|
$
|
|
||
|
Distributions reversed
|
||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
$
|
|
Distributions payable decreased by approximately $349 ,000 during the
three months ended December 31, 2023.
12
The following provides details of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net during the three months ended December
31, 2022 ($ in thousands) (unaudited):
| Cash | Remeasure- | |||||||||||
|
Activities
|
ment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Restricted cash
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Other assets
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
The following provides details of the distributions (declared) reversed, net during the three months ended December 31, 2022
($ in thousands) (unaudited):
|
Distributions declared
|
$
|
|
||
|
Distributions reversed
|
||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
$
|
|
Distributions payable decreased by approximately $6 ,000
during the three months ended December 31, 2022.
The following provides details of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net during the six months ended December 31,
2023 ($ in thousands) (unaudited):
|
Cash
|
Remeasure-
|
|||||||||||
|
Activities
|
ment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
(
|
)
|
( |
) | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
13
The following provides details of the distributions (declared) reversed, net during the six months ended December 31, 2023 ($ in
thousands) (unaudited):
|
Distributions declared
|
$
|
|
||
|
Distributions reversed
|
||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
$
|
|
Distributions
payable decreased by approximately $389 ,000 during the six months ended December
31, 2023.
The following provides details of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net during the six months ended December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands) (unaudited):
| Cash | Remeasure- | |||||||||||
|
Activities
|
ment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Accrued liquidation costs
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
The following provides details of the distributions (declared) reversed, net during the six months ended December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands) (unaudited):
|
Distributions declared
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
Distributions reversed
|
||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
$
|
|
Distributions
payable decreased by approximately $67,547 ,000 during the six months ended December
31, 2022.
14
| 8) |
Liquidation Trust Interests
|
The following table summarizes the Liquidation Trust Interests (rounded) for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 (unaudited):
| For the Six Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2023 |
2022 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Liquidation Trust Interests
|
Class A
|
Class B
|
Class A
|
Class B
|
||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Allowed claims
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Settlement of claims by cancelling Liquidation |
||||||||||||||||
|
Trust Interests
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||
|
Outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Of the 11,514,662 Class A Interests outstanding at
December 31, 2023, 11,435,288 are held by Qualifying Victims (see Note 6).
At the Plan Effective Date, certain claims were disputed. As those disputed claims are resolved,
additional Class A Interests and (if applicable) Class B Interests are issued on account of allowed claims or Class A Interests and (if applicable) Class B Interests are cancelled. No Class A Interests or Class B Interests are issued on account
of disallowed claims.
The following table summarizes the unresolved claims against the Debtors as they relate to
Liquidation Trust Interests (rounded) for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 (unaudited):
|
For the Six Months Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
|
Liquidation Trust Interests
|
Class A
|
Class B
|
Class A
|
Class B
|
||||||||||||
|
Reserved for unresolved claims at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Allowed claims
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Disallowed claims
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||
|
Reserved for unresolved claims at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Of the 4,791 Class A Interests relating to unresolved
claims at December 31, 2023, 1,880 were for Qualifying Victims (see Note 6).
| 9) |
Distributions
|
The Plan provides for a distribution waterfall that specifies the priority and manner of distribution of available cash to all Interestholders,
excluding distributions of the net sales proceeds from Forfeited Assets (see Note 6). Distributions are to be made (a) to the Class A Interests until they have received distributions of $75.00 per Class A Interest; thereafter (b) to the Class B Interests until they have received distributions of $75.00 10 %, compounded annually, accrued on the aggregate
principal amount of all Net Note Claims, Allowed General Unsecured Claims and Net Unit Claims, all as defined in the Plan, treating each distribution pursuant to (a) and (b) above as reductions of such principal amount; and thereafter (d) to the
holders of Allowed Subordinated Claims, as defined in the Plan, until such claims are paid in full, including interest, at a per annum fixed rate of 10 %
or such higher rate as may be agreed to, as provided for in the Plan, compounded annually, accrued on the principal amount of each Allowed Subordinated Claim, as defined.
15
On August 3, 2023, at the recommendation of the Liquidation
Trustee, the Trust suspended the making of additional distributions pending the results of the Company’s investigation of a construction defect claim against one of the Wind-Down Subsidiaries by the buyer of one of the subsidiary’s
single-family homes. There were no
There were no
|
Six Months Ended December 31, 2022
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Date
Declared
|
$ per
Class A
Interest
|
Total
Declared
|
Paid
|
Deposit Into
Restricted
Cash
Account
|
||||||||||||||
| Tenth |
|
(a) |
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
(a) The distribution was declared on June 15, 2022 and was paid on July 15, 2022. The deposit into the restricted cash account with
respect to the tenth distribution was made on July 26, 2022.
As claims are resolved, additional Class A Interests may be issued or cancelled. Therefore, the total amount of a distribution
declared may change. In addition, distributions may change if Interestholders that were previously deemed to have forfeited their rights to receive Class A Interest distributions subsequently respond and if overpaid distributions are
returned.
For every distribution, a deposit is made into a restricted cash account for
amounts (a) payable for Class A Interests that may be issued in the future upon the allowance of unresolved claims, (b) in respect of Class A Interests issued on account of recently allowed claims, (c) for holders of Class A Interests who
failed to cash distribution checks mailed in respect of prior distributions, (d) for distributions that were withheld due to pending avoidance actions and (e) for holders of Class A Interests for which the Trust is waiting for further
beneficiary information.
During the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, as (a) claims were
resolved, (b) claims were recently allowed, (c) addresses for holders of uncashed distribution checks were obtained, (d) pending avoidance actions were resolved and (e) further beneficiary information was received, distributions of
approximately $15 ,000 and $6 ,000,
respectively, were paid to holders of Class A Interests from the restricted cash account and distributions payable were reduced by the same amounts. During the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, distributions of approximately $15 ,000 and $657 ,000,
respectively, were paid to holders of Class A Interests from the restricted cash account and distributions payable were reduced by the same amounts.
During the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, as a result of
claims being disallowed or Class A Interests being cancelled, approximately $333 ,000 and $0 , respectively, and during the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, approximately $373 ,000 and $2,638 ,000, respectively, were released from the restricted
cash account and distributions payable were reduced by the same amounts.
As a result of distribution checks that had not been cashed within 180 days
of their issuance, Interestholders were deemed to have forfeited their rights to reserved and future Class A Interest distributions. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, some Interestholders that had previously
been deemed to have forfeited their rights to receive Class A Interest distributions had responded and, therefore, approximately $0 12
16
| 10) |
Related Party Transactions
|
Terry Goebel, a member of the Trust Supervisory Board, is president and a principal owner of G3 Group LA (“G3”), a construction firm specializing
in the development of high-end luxury residences. G3 is owned by Terry Goebel and his son Kelly Goebel. During the year ended June 30, 2023, the Company completed its contract with G3 for the development of one single-family home in Los Angeles, California. As of December 31, 2023 and June 30, 2023, there were no no
The Liquidation Trustee of the Trust is entitled to receive 5 % of the total gross amount recovered by the Trust from the pursuit of the Causes of Action. During the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, approximately $4 ,000 and $2 ,000, respectively, and during the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, approximately $2,484 ,000 and $9 ,000, respectively,
were accrued as amounts due to the Liquidation Trustee. As of December 31, 2023 and June 30, 2023, approximately $29 ,000 and $32 ,000, respectively, were payable to the Liquidation Trustee. These amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated statements of net assets in liquidation.
During the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, approximately $1,275 ,000 and $0 , respectively, and during the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, approximately $2,487 ,000 and $0 , respectively,
were paid to the Liquidation Trustee.
In November 2019, the Trust entered into an arrangement with Akerman LLP, a law firm based in Miami, Florida, of which the Liquidation Trustee is a partner, for the provision, at the option of
the Trust on an as-needed basis, of e-discovery and related litigation support services in connection with the Trust’s prosecution of the Causes of Action. Under the arrangement, the Trust is charged for the services at scheduled rates per task
which, depending on specific task, include flat rates, rates based on volume of data processed, rates based on the number of data users, the hourly rates of Akerman LLP personnel, or other rates. During the three months ended December 31, 2023
and 2022, approximately $106 ,000 and $115 ,000, respectively, and during the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, approximately $212 ,000 and $268 ,000, respectively, were paid related to these services and there are no
The executive officers of the Wind-Down Entity were entitled to a bonus based on the Wind-Down Entity achieving certain specified cumulative amounts of distributions to
the Trust. Effective January 1, 2023, there were no remaining bonus arrangements for the executive officers. Accordingly, no 0 and $1,200 ,000, respectively, and
during the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 approximately $0 and $3,273 ,000, respectively, were paid related to bonuses.
| 11) |
Causes of Action
|
One of the Trust’s liquidation activities is to litigate and/or settle Causes of Action. The main areas of litigation have involved actions against Comerica
Bank, law firms and individual attorneys and avoidance actions. The Company recognizes recoveries from settlements when an agreement is executed, final court approval is received (if required), and collectability is reasonably assured.
In December 2021, the Trust received court approval of its agreement to settle its litigation against Comerica Bank. The Trust has also pursued litigation
against nine law firms and 10
individual attorneys.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2023, the Trust and the law firm of Rome McGuigan, P.C. agreed to settle the Trust’s pending litigation against that firm and related defendant for $5,000 ,000. The settlement is expected to result in proceeds to the Trust of approximately $3,328 ,000, net of attorney’s fees and other litigation expenses. The settlement has not been recorded in the Company’s December 31, 2023 consolidated financial
statements because, as of December 31, 2023, it was subject to the California Superior Court granting a motion by Rome McGuigan, P.C. for a court order finding that the settlement has been made by the parties in good faith. The California
Superior Court scheduled the motion to be heard on January 23, 2024. See Note 13 for additional information.
17
As of December 31, 2023, the cases against seven
law firms and eight individual attorneys have been settled or dismissed and litigation against the other two law firms and two individual
attorneys are in various stages. See Note 13 for additional information.
The Trust has also filed numerous avoidance actions, most of which have been resolved, resulting in recoveries by or judgments in favor of the Trust. As of
December 31, 2023, 34 legal actions remain pending. Additionally, since February 15, 2019 and as of December 31, 2023, the Trust
has obtained default and stipulated judgments related to certain avoidance actions. It is unknown at this time how much, if any, will ultimately be collected on the judgments. Therefore, the Company has not recognized any recoveries from
these judgments.
During the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded approximately $82 ,000 and $41 ,000, respectively,
and during the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded approximately $34,510 ,000 and $231 ,000, respectively, from the settlement of Causes of Action. The Company also recorded liabilities of 5 % of the settlements as amounts payable to the Liquidation Trustee and an allowance for uncollectible settlement installment receivables. See
Note 4 for information about the settlement receivables, net as of December 31, 2023 and June 30, 2023.
| 12) |
Commitments and Contingencies
|
Since the Company uses the liquidation basis of accounting, the Company has accrued estimated liquidation costs to the extent they are reasonably determinable, which
includes the items discussed in this footnote.
The Company has a lease for its office space that expired on January 31, 2024. This lease was not renewed upon expiration. The monthly base rent was approximately $4 ,000 per month. The amount of rent paid, including common area maintenance and parking charges, during the three months ended December
31, 2023 and 2022, was approximately $14 ,000 and $13 ,000, respectively, and during the six
months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, was approximately $29 ,000 and $25 ,000, respectively. On December 18, 2023, the Company entered into a new month-to-month lease
for office space commencing on January 1, 2024 and can be terminated with no less than one month’s notice from the first day of any calendar month. The monthly rent is approximately $2 ,000. On December 20,
2023, the Company paid a deposit of approximately $2 ,000 related to the new office lease.
The Wind-Down Entity has part-time employment agreements with its two executive officers
through December 31, 2023. The agreements renewed automatically on January 1, 2024, subject to the right of either party to terminate the agreement at any time and for any reason on thirty days ’ advance written notice.
A construction defect claim was
asserted against one of the Wind-Down Subsidiaries by the buyer of one of the subsidiary’s single-family homes during the year ended June 30, 2023. The subsidiary has tendered the claim to its insurance carriers; however, the carriers have not
yet accepted the claim. At this time, the amount of the liability exposure has not been determined and the subsidiary’s exposure is unknown. The subsidiary is investigating the claim, including the extent and causes of the alleged damage and
the identification of other potentially responsible persons.
The Company is not presently the defendant in any material litigation nor, to the Company’s knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company other than as described herein.
| 13) |
Subsequent Events
|
The Company evaluates subsequent events up until the date the
unaudited consolidated financial statements are issued.
Distributions
During
the period from January 1, 2024 through February 12, 2024, as (a) claims were resolved, (b) claims were recently allowed, (c) addresses for holders of uncashed distribution checks were obtained, (d) pending avoidance actions were resolved and
(e) further beneficiary information was received, distributions of approximately $1 ,000 were paid to holders of Class A Interests
from the restricted cash account and distributions payable were reduced by the same amounts.
18
Causes of Action
On January 19,
2024, the appellate court affirmed the lower court’s decision dismissing the Company’s litigation against Sidley Austin LLP. The Trust has elected not to seek further appellate review of this ruling. The attorneys’ fees and costs owed to
Sidley Austin LLP are
approximately $290 ,000, plus (potentially) additional fees in connection with prosecution of the appeal, the amount of which will
not be known until Sidley Austin
LLP seeks such additional fees and the trial court considers the issue at some future date.
On January 23,
2024, the California Superior Court granted Rome McGuigan’s motion to determine that the settlement with the Trust was reached in good faith. Under the terms of the agreement, payment of the net settlement is expected on or before February
15, 2024 in the amount of approximately $3,328 ,000. The Company will record approximately $250 ,000 as the amount due to the Liquidation Trustee on account of this settlement.
Forfeited Assets
During the period from January 1, 2024 through February 12, 2024, the Company received net proceeds of
approximately $5,100 from the sale of Forfeited Assets.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis of changes in net assets and net assets in liquidation should be read in conjunction with the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Woodbridge Liquidation Trust and the related notes thereto. The Trust, the Remaining Debtors, the Wind-Down Entity and the Wind-Down Subsidiaries, as used herein, are defined in Note 1 to
the consolidated financial statements and are collectively referred to herein as the Company.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Those statements include, without
limitation, financial guidance, projections and statements with respect to expectation of future financial condition, changes in net assets in liquidation, cash flows, plans, targets, goals, objectives, performance, and termination and dissolution
of the Trust. Such forward-looking statements (other than historical facts) that address future plans, goals, expectations, activities, events or developments. The Trust has tried, where possible, to use words such as “anticipates”, “if”,
“believes”, “estimates”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends”, “forecasts”, “initiative”, “objective”, “goal”, “projects”, “outlook”, “priorities”, “target”, “evaluate”, “pursue”, “seek”, “potential”, “continue”, “designed”, “impact”, “may”, “could”,
“would”, “should”, “will” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond
our control and not all of which can be predicted by the Trust. Such risks and uncertainties include the amount of funds needed for construction defect and other claims, the amount of general and administrative costs, the number and amount of
successful Causes of Action and/or settlements and the ability to recover thereon, the amount of funding required to continue litigations, changes in tax and other governmental rules and regulations applicable to the Trust and its subsidiaries, and
other risks identified and described in “Part I. Financial Information, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, or contained in any of the Trust’s subsequent filings with the SEC including “Part II. Other Information,
Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Form 10-Q. Accordingly, the Trust cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statements will be realized, as actual results may differ materially from those identified or implied in any forward-looking statement. These
risks and uncertainties are beyond the ability of the Trust to control, and in many cases, the Trust cannot predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking
statements.
In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act, the Trust has identified and is
disclosing important factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements made by the Trust, or on the Trust’s behalf. (See “Part II. Other Information, Item
1A. Risk Factors” of this Form 10-Q.) These cautionary statements are to be used as a reference in connection with any forward-looking statements. The factors, risks and uncertainties identified in these cautionary statements are in addition to
those contained in any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or otherwise addressed in connection with a forward-looking statement or contained in any of the Trust’s subsequent filings with the SEC. Because of these
factors, risks and uncertainties, the Trust cautions against placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Although the Trust believes that the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements are currently reasonable, any of the
assumptions could be incorrect or incomplete, and there can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. Except as may be required by law,
the Trust does not undertake any obligations to modify, update or revise any forward-looking statement to take into account or otherwise reflect subsequent events, corrections in or revisions of underlying assumptions, or changes in circumstances
arising after the date that the forward-looking statement was made.
Overview
Pursuant to the Plan, the Trust was formed on February 15, 2019 to hold, either directly or indirectly through the Wind-Down Entity and
the Wind-Down Subsidiaries, the assets and equity interests formerly owned by the Debtors. Each of the real properties formerly owned by the Debtors was transferred, on the effective date of the Plan, to one of the Wind-Down Subsidiaries. The
purpose of the Wind-Down Group is to develop (as applicable), market, and sell those properties to generate cash. Assets formerly owned by the Debtors other than real estate assets and certain cash were transferred on the Plan Effective Date of the
Trust. The purpose of the Trust is to receive remittances of cash from the Wind-Down Entity, to resolve disputed claims, to prosecute the Causes of Action, to pay allowed Administrative Claims and Priority Claims, as defined in the Plan, and,
subject to the payment of Trust expenses and the retention of various reserves, to make distributions of cash to Interestholders in accordance with the Plan.
20
The Trust operates pursuant to the Plan and the Trust Agreement. The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust and is administered by
the Liquidation Trustee under the supervision of its Supervisory Board. The Wind-Down Entity, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Trust, operates pursuant to the Plan and the Wind-Down Entity LLC Agreement, as amended. The Wind-Down Entity was formed
as a Delaware limited liability company and is administered by its Board of Managers. The current sole member of the Board of Managers is also a member of the Supervisory Board of the Trust.
The Bankruptcy Court has retained certain jurisdictions regarding the Trust, the Liquidation Trustee, the Supervisory Board, the Wind-Down
Entity, the Board of Managers, and assets of the Trust and the Wind-Down Entity, including the determination of all disputes arising out of or related to administration of the Trust and the Wind-Down Entity and
its subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2023, the number of Liquidation Trust Interests outstanding in each class is as follows:
|
Class of Interest
|
Number Outstanding as of
December 31, 2023
|
|||
|
Class A Liquidation Trust Interests
|
11,514,662
|
|||
|
Class B Liquidation Trust Interests
|
675,617
|
|||
For each of the classes of Liquidation Trust Interests, the number of Liquidation Trust Interests outstanding will increase to the extent
that the disputed claims become allowed claims. In addition, the number of Liquidation Trust Interests outstanding will decrease to the extent that disputed claims are settled by cancelling previously issued Liquidation Trust Interests.
Since the Plan Effective Date through December 31, 2023, the Wind-Down Subsidiaries have disposed of
approximately 149 properties for aggregate net sales proceeds of approximately $576.00 million. At December 31, 2023, there were only two remaining real estate assets with a carrying value of approximately $0.47 million. Going forward, the Company’s most significant source of cash is expected to be from interest earnings and from the settlement of the remaining Causes of Action. In addition to pursuing the remaining Causes of Action, the Company’s most significant current activity is overseeing the resolution of the construction defect claim asserted against one of the
subsidiaries of the Wind-Down Entity. The Company currently expects to complete its liquidation activities during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026.
21
Discussion of the Company’s Operations
For the three months ended December 31, 2023
The following is a summary of the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation for the three months ended December 31, 2023 ($ in
thousands):
|
Restricted for
Qualifying Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Net assets in liquidation as of beginning of period
|
$
|
3,511
|
$
|
35,863
|
$
|
39,374
|
||||||
|
Change in assets and liabilities (Note 7):
|
||||||||||||
|
Restricted for Qualifying Victims -
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
30
|
-
|
30
|
|||||||||
|
All Interestholders -
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
-
|
82
|
82
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
-
|
333
|
333
|
|||||||||
|
Net change in assets and liabilities
|
-
|
415
|
415
|
|||||||||
|
Net assets in liquidation as of end of period
|
$
|
3,541
|
$
|
36,278
|
$
|
39,819
|
||||||
Net assets in liquidation – Restricted for Qualifying Victims increased by approximately $0.03 million during the three months ended
December 31, 2023.
Net assets in liquidation – All Interestholders increased by approximately $0.41 million during the three-month period ended December 31,
2023. This increase was due to an increase in the net carrying value of assets and liabilities of approximately $0.08 million and distributions reversed of approximately $0.33 million for Class A Interests being cancelled.
The components of the changes in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net are as follows ($ in thousands):
|
Restricted for
Qualifying Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Settlement recoveries, net (1)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
78
|
$
|
78
|
||||||
|
Sales proceeds in excess of carrying value
|
-
|
25
|
25
|
|||||||||
|
Remeasurement of assets and liabilities, net (2)
|
30
|
(25
|
)
|
5
|
||||||||
|
Other
|
-
|
4
|
4
|
|||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
30
|
$
|
82
|
$
|
112
|
||||||
| (1) |
Net of 5% payable to the Liquidation Trustee of approximately $4,000.
|
| (2) |
Includes interest of approximately $29,000 and $127,000 for Reserved for Qualifying Victims and for All Interestholders, respectively.
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2023, the Company:
| • |
Reversed distributions of approximately $0.33 million from claims being disallowed.
|
| • |
Received net proceeds of approximately $0.50 million from the sale of the Hawaii property.
|
| • |
Recorded approximately $0.08 million from the settlement of Causes of Action, net of 5% payable to the Liquidation Trustee.
|
| • |
Paid construction costs of approximately $0.08 million and received bond refunds of approximately $0.17 million.
|
22
| • |
Paid general and administrative costs of approximately $3.00 million, including approximately $0.07 million of board member fees and expenses, approximately
$0.41 million of payroll and other general and administrative costs, approximately $1.24 million of professional fees and approximately $1.28 million paid to the Liquidation Trustee.
|
For the three months ended December 31, 2022
The following is a summary of the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation for the three months ended December 31,
2022 ($ in thousands):
|
Restricted for
Qualifying Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Net assets in liquidation as of beginning of period
|
$
|
3,483
|
$
|
34,433
|
$
|
37,916
|
||||||
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Restricted for Qualifying Victims -
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
All Interestholders -
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
-
|
1,236
|
1,236
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
Net change in assets and liabilities
|
-
|
1,236
|
1,236
|
|||||||||
|
Net assets in liquidation, as of end of period
|
$
|
3,483
|
$
|
35,669
|
$
|
39,152
|
||||||
Net assets in liquidation – Restricted for Qualifying Victims – there was no change during the three months ended December 31, 2022.
Net assets in liquidation – All Interestholders increased approximately $1.24 million during the three months ended December 31, 2022.
This increase was due to changes in the net carrying value of assets and liabilities of approximately $1.24 million.
The components of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net are as follows ($ in thousands):
|
Restricted for
Qualifying Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Remeasurement of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
910
|
$
|
910
|
||||||
|
Settlement recoveries (1)
|
-
|
40
|
40
|
|||||||||
|
Other (2)
|
-
|
286
|
286
|
|||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,236
|
$
|
1,236
|
||||||
| (1) |
Net of 5% payable to the Liquidation Trustee of approximately $2 and a reversal of an allowance for uncollectible settlement installment receivables of approximately $2.
|
| (2) |
The components of Other are as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
Sales of furniture, net
|
$
|
228
|
||
|
Cash interest earned
|
57
|
|||
|
Miscellaneous
|
1
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
286
|
23
During the three months ended December 31, 2022, the Company:
| • |
Received net proceeds from the sale of Forfeited Assets of approximately $0.14 million.
|
| • |
Completed construction of one single-family home (41 King Street).
|
| • |
Recorded approximately $0.04 million for the settlement of Causes of Action, net of 5% payable to the Liquidation Trustee and the reversal of an allowance for uncollectible installment receivables.
|
| • |
Paid construction costs of approximately $0.28 million relating to single-family homes under development.
|
| • |
Paid holding costs of approximately $0.19 million.
|
| • |
Paid general and administrative costs of approximately $4.14 million, including approximately $0.16 million of board member fees and expenses, approximately $2.37 million of payroll and other general and
administrative costs and approximately $1.61 million of professional fees.
|
For the six months ended December 31, 2023
The following is a summary of the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation for the six months ended December 31, 2023 ($ in thousands):
|
Restricted for
Qualifying Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Net assets in liquidation as of beginning of period
|
$
|
3,491
|
$
|
3,282
|
$
|
6,773
|
||||||
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Restricted for Qualifying Victims -
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
50
|
-
|
50
|
|||||||||
|
All Interestholders -
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
-
|
32,623
|
32,623
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
-
|
373
|
373
|
|||||||||
|
Net change in assets and liabilities
|
-
|
32,996
|
32,996
|
|||||||||
|
Net assets in liquidation, as of end of period
|
$
|
3,541
|
$
|
36,278
|
$
|
39,819
|
||||||
Net assets in liquidation – Restricted for Qualifying Victims increased by approximately $0.05 million during the six months ended
December 31, 2023.
Net assets in liquidation – All Interestholders increased by approximately $32.99 million during the six-month period ended December 31,
2023. This increase was due to an increase in the net carrying value of assets and liabilities of approximately $32.62 million and distributions reversed of approximately $0.37 million for Class A Interests being cancelled.
The components of the changes in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net are as follows ($ in thousands):
24
|
Restricted for
Qualifying Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Settlement recoveries, net (1)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
32,026
|
$
|
32,026
|
||||||
|
Remeasurement of assets and liabilities, net (2)
|
38
|
556
|
594
|
|||||||||
|
Sales proceeds in excess of carrying value
|
12
|
25
|
37
|
|||||||||
|
Other
|
-
|
16
|
16
|
|||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
50
|
$
|
32,623
|
$
|
32,673
|
||||||
| (1) |
Net of 5% payable to the Liquidation Trustee of approximately $2,484,000.
|
| (2) |
Includes interest of approximately $38,000 and $607,000 for Reserved for Qualifying Victims and for All Interestholders, respectively.
|
During the six months ended December 31, 2023, the Company:
| • |
Reversed distributions of approximately $0.37 million from claims being disallowed.
|
| • | Received net proceeds of approximately $0.50 million from the sale of the Hawaii property. |
| • |
Received net proceeds from the sale of Forfeited Assets of approximately $0.05 million.
|
| • |
Recorded approximately $32.03 million from the settlement of Causes of Action, net of 5% payable to the Liquidation Trustee.
|
| • |
Paid construction costs of approximately $0.12 million and received bond refunds of approximately $0.17 million.
|
| • |
Paid holding costs of approximately $0.01 million.
|
| • |
Paid general and administrative costs of approximately $6.11 million, including approximately $0.14 million of board member fees and expenses, approximately
$0.77 million of payroll and other general and administrative costs, approximately $2.71 million of professional fees and approximately $2.49 million paid to the Liquidation Trustee.
|
For the six months ended December 31, 2022
The following is a summary of the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation for the six months ended December 31,
2022 ($ in thousands):
|
Restricted for
Qualifying Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Net assets in liquidation as of beginning of period
|
$
|
3,485
|
$
|
30,910
|
$
|
34,395
|
||||||
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Restricted for Qualifying Victims -
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
(2
|
)
|
-
|
(2
|
)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
All Interestholders -
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
-
|
2,121
|
2,121
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions (declared) reversed, net
|
-
|
2,638
|
2,638
|
|||||||||
|
Net change in assets and liabilities
|
-
|
4,759
|
4,759
|
|||||||||
|
Net assets in liquidation, as of end of period
|
$
|
3,483
|
$
|
35,669
|
$
|
39,152
|
||||||
25
Net assets in liquidation – Restricted for Qualifying Victims decreased by approximately $0.002 million during the six months ended
December 3, 2022.
Net assets in liquidation – All Interestholders increased approximately $4.76 million during the six months ended December 31, 2022. This
increase was due to changes in the net carrying value of assets and liabilities of approximately $2.12 million and distributions reversed of approximately $2.64 million for disallowed claims and cancelled interests.
The components of the change in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, net are as follows ($ in thousands):
|
Restricted for
Qualifying Victims
|
All
Interestholders
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Remeasurement of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
1,199
|
$
|
1,197
|
|||||
|
Settlement recoveries (1)
|
-
|
194
|
194
|
|||||||||
|
Other (2)
|
-
|
728
|
728
|
|||||||||
|
Change in carrying value of assets and liabilities, net
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
2,121
|
$
|
2,119
|
|||||
| (1) |
Net of 5% payable to the Liquidation Trustee of approximately $10 and an allowance for uncollectible settlement installment receivables of approximately $27.
|
| (2) |
The components of Other are as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
Sales of furniture, net
|
$
|
634
|
||
|
Cash interest earned
|
101
|
|||
|
Miscellaneous
|
(7
|
)
|
||
|
Total
|
$
|
728
|
During the six months ended December 31, 2022, the Company:
| • |
Reversed distributions of approximately $2.65 primarily from claims being disallowed or Class A Interests being cancelled. Distributions that had been previously reversed were recorded of approximately $0.01
million for Interestholders that were previously deemed to have forfeited their rights to receive Class A Interest distributions but had subsequently responded.
|
| • |
Received net proceeds from the sale of Forfeited Assets of approximately $0.71 million.
|
| • |
Completed construction of two single-family homes (41 King Street).
|
| • |
Recorded approximately $0.23 million for the settlement of Causes of Action, net of 5% payable to the Liquidation Trustee and an allowance for uncollectible installment receivables.
|
| • |
Paid construction costs of approximately $1.55 million relating to single-family homes under development.
|
| • |
Paid holding costs of approximately $0.47 million.
|
| • |
Paid general and administrative costs of approximately $9.10 million, including approximately $0.32 million of board member fees and expenses, approximately $5.40 million of payroll and other general and
administrative costs and approximately $3.29 million of professional fees.
|
26
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
The Company’s primary sources for meeting its capital requirements are its cash and cash equivalents, receipt of interest earned
on cash and cash equivalents, proceeds from liquidating it other assets, recoveries on Causes of Action, if any, and proceeds from the sale of Forfeited Assets.1 The Company’s primary uses of funds are and will continue to be for distributions and operating costs, including costs related to construction defect claims and other
costs. While the Company expects to be able to adequately fund its operations over the next twelve months from its primary sources of capital, during the year ended June 30, 2023, a construction defect claim was asserted against a subsidiary of
the Company by the buyer of one of the subsidiary’s single-family homes. At this time, the amount of the liability exposure has not been determined and the subsidiary’s exposure is unknown.
Capital Resources
In addition to consolidated cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2023 of approximately $60.22 million (of which approximately
$4.19 million is restricted), the capital resources available to the Company are as follows:
| • |
Proceeds from Real Estate Transactions: As of December 31, 2023, the Company owned two real estate assets with an estimated carrying value of
approximately $0.47 million. Based on the remaining real estate assets of the Company, future net proceeds will be negligible as compared to the proceeds the Company has realized in prior periods.
|
| • |
Causes of Action Recoveries: During the three and six months ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized approximately $0.82 million and $34.51
million, respectively, from the settlement of Causes of Action. Based on the remaining Causes of Action, future recoveries will be negligible as compared to the proceeds the Company has realized in prior periods.
|
| • |
Interest Earnings: As of December 31, 2023, the Company has accrued approximately $1.32 million of interest earnings through March 31, 2026. Of this
amount, the Company projects to receive approximately $0.64 million of interest earnings through June 30, 2024.
|
| • |
Forfeited Assets: Forfeited Assets consist of cash and other assets (jewelry and art). There were no sales of Forfeited Assets during the three
months ended December 31, 2023. During the six months ended December 31, 2023, the Trust sold some of its Forfeited Assets and received net proceeds of approximately $0.05 million. On
February 7, 2023, the Trust was informed that the DOJ received additional Forfeited Assets from a co-defendant of Robert Shapiro and the DOJ proposes to transfer these Forfeited Assets to the Trust. On December 12, 2023, the DOJ granted the
Trust’s petition for remittance of the additional Forfeited Assets. At this time, the Trust is unable to estimate the precise amount or timing of the transfer of any such Forfeited Assets and therefore these future proceeds have not been
recorded as of December 31, 2023. As noted earlier, net sale proceeds from liquidating the Forfeited Assets are to be distributed only to Qualifying Victims.
|
Uses of Liquidity
The primary uses of the Company’s liquidity are to pay distributions payable, and fund operating costs and costs related to construction
defect claim(s) (if required) and other costs. As of December 31, 2023, the Company’s total liabilities were approximately $22.87 million. The total liabilities recorded as of December 31, 2023 may not be indicative of the costs paid in future
periods, which may vary materially from the current estimate.
1The Trust is required to distribute the net sale proceeds
from liquidating the Forfeited Assets to the Qualifying Victims. Qualifying Victims are the former holders of Class 3 and Class 5 Claims and their permitted assigns. Former holders of Class 4 Claims are not Qualifying Victims. Because of the
requirement to distribute the net sale proceeds of the Forfeited Assets to the Qualifying Victims only, the Forfeited Assets as of December 31, 2023 are presented in the consolidated statement of net assets as restricted net assets in
liquidation. As of December 31, 2023, 11,435,288 of the 11,514,662 Class A Interests were held by Qualifying Victims. As of December 31, 2023, 1,880 of the 4,791 Class A Interests relating to unresolved claims were for Qualifying Victims.
27
Given current cash and cash equivalent balances, projected proceeds from real estate transactions, estimated Causes of Action recoveries,
distributions payable, and expected cash needs, the Company does not expect a deficiency in liquidity in the next twelve months. Due to the uncertain nature of future proceeds from real estate transactions, recoveries and costs to be incurred
including any costs related to construction defect claims and other costs, it is not possible to be certain that the current liquidity will be adequate to cover all future financial needs of the Company. Creating contingent obligation agreements
and/or seeking methods to reduce professional costs, including legal fees, and administrative costs are strategies that could be undertaken to address liquidity issues should they arise. These strategies could impact the Company’s ability to
maximize recoveries from the settlement of unresolved Causes of Action.
Distributions
Distributions will be made at the sole discretion of the Liquidation Trustee in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and
the Trust Agreement. On August 3, 2023, at the recommendation of the Liquidation Trustee, the Trust suspended the making of additional Trust distributions pending the
result of the Company’s investigation of a construction defect claim.
As of February 12, 2024, the Liquidation Trustee has declared eleven (11) distributions to the Class A Interestholders. The distributions
include a cash distribution on account of the then-allowed claims and a deposit is made into a restricted cash account for amounts that are or may become payable (a) in respect of Class A Interests that may be issued in the future upon the
allowance of unresolved bankruptcy claims, (b) in respect of Class A Interests on account of recently allowed claims, (c) for holders of Class A Interests who failed to cash distribution checks mailed in respect of prior distributions, (d) for
distributions that were withheld due to pending avoidance actions and (e) for holders of Class A Interests for which the Trust is waiting for further beneficiary information.
As claims are resolved, additional Class A Interests may be issued or cancelled (see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on
September 28, 2023, “Part 1, Item 1. Business, D. Plan Provisions Regarding the Company, 2. Treatment under the Plan of holders of claims against and equity interests in the Debtors and 3. Assets and liabilities of the Company”). Therefore, the
total amount of a distribution declared may change between the date declared and the date paid. The Liquidation Trustee will continue to assess the adequacy of funds held and may make additional cash distributions on account of Class A Interests
but does not currently know the timing or amount of any such distribution(s).
Sections 7.6 and 7.18 of the Plan provide that distributions that have not been cashed within 180 calendar days of their issuance shall be
null and void and the holder of the associated Liquidation Trust Interests “shall be deemed to have forfeited its rights to any reserved and future Distributions under the Plan,” with such amounts to become “Available Cash” of the Trust for all
purposes. On February 1, 2022, the Trust sent letters to the holders of the Class A Interests who had failed to cash distribution checks in respect of prior distributions, which checks were issued more than 180 days prior to the date of the
letter. The letter informed each recipient that, unless the Trust was contacted on or before February 28, 2022, such recipient’s reserved and future distributions would be deemed forfeited in accordance with the Plan. The Trust provided this final
notice simply as a one-time courtesy and reserves its rights to strictly enforce the Plan’s forfeiture provisions, and any other provision of the Plan, against any person (including any recipient of the final notice) at any time in the future,
without further notice.
28
The following tables summarize the distributions declared, distributions paid and the activity in the restricted cash account for
the periods from February 15, 2019 (inception) through December 31, 2023 and from February 15, 2019 (inception) through February 12, 2024:
|
During the Period from
February 15, 2019 (inception) through
December 31, 2023 ($ in Millions)
|
During the Period from
February 15, 2019 (inception) through February 12, 2024 ($ in Millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Date
Declared
|
$ per
Class A Interest |
Total Declared
|
Paid
|
Restricted
Cash
Account
|
Total Declared
|
Paid
|
Restricted
Cash
Account
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions Declared
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First
|
3/15/2019
|
$
|
3.75
|
$
|
44.70
|
$
|
42.32
|
$
|
2.38
|
$
|
44.70
|
$
|
42.32
|
$ |
2.38
|
||||||||||||||
|
Second
|
1/2/2020
|
4.50
|
53.44
|
51.20
|
2.24
|
53.44
|
51.20
|
2.24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Third
|
3/31/2020
|
2.12
|
25.00
|
24.19
|
0.81
|
25.00
|
24.19
|
0.81
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fourth
|
7/13/2020
|
2.56
|
29.97
|
29.24
|
0.73
|
29.97
|
29.24
|
0.73
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fifth
|
10/19/2020
|
2.56
|
29.96
|
29.21
|
0.75
|
29.96
|
29.21
|
0.75
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sixth
|
1/7/2021
|
4.28
|
50.01
|
48.67
|
1.34
|
50.01
|
48.67
|
1.34
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Seventh (a)
|
5/13/2021
|
2.58
|
30.04
|
29.35
|
0.69
|
30.04
|
29.35
|
0.69
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eighth
|
10/8/2021
|
3.44
|
40.02
|
39.14
|
0.88
|
40.02
|
39.14
|
0.88
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ninth
|
2/4/2022
|
3.44
|
39.98
|
39.15
|
0.83
|
39.98
|
39.15
|
0.83
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tenth
|
6/15/2022
|
5.63
|
65.02
|
64.19
|
0.83
|
65.02
|
64.19
|
0.83
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eleventh
|
5/10/2023
|
2.18
|
25.02
|
24.90
|
0.12
|
25.02
|
24.90
|
0.12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
$
|
37.04
|
$
|
433.16
|
$
|
421.56
|
$
|
11.60
|
$
|
433.16
|
$
|
421.56
|
$
|
11.60
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Distributions Returned / (Reversed)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Disallowed/cancelled (b)
|
(6.64
|
)
|
(6.64
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Returned (c)
|
0.74
|
0.74
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forfeited (d)
|
(1.13
|
)
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Subtotal
|
(7.03
|
)
|
(7.03
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions Paid from Reserve Account (e)
|
(3.68
|
)
|
(3.68
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions Payable, Net
|
as of 12/31/2023:
|
$
|
0.89
|
as of 2/12/2024:
|
$
|
0.89
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
The seventh distribution included the cash the Trust received from Fair Funds.
|
| (b) |
As a result of claims being disallowed or Class A Interests cancelled.
|
| (c) |
Distribution checks returned or not cashed.
|
| (d) |
Distributions forfeited as Interestholders did not cash checks that were over 180 days old.
|
| (e) |
Paid as claims are allowed or resolved.
|
Since its inception, the Wind-Down Entity has made substantial progress toward completion of its liquidation activities
and has liquidated all but two real estate assets with carrying value of approximately $0.47 million. Holders of Liquidation Trust Interests are advised that future distributions from the Trust, if any, will be limited and will be materially
reliant on future recoveries from litigation, net of accrued liquidation costs, including amounts for potential construction defect claims, which are uncertain and the amount and timing of which are difficult to determine.
Contractual Obligations
The Company had an office lease that expired on January 31, 2024. On December 18, 2023, the Company entered into a new month-to-month
lease for office space commencing January 1, 2024. The Company expects that it will continue to lease office space until the liquidation process is completed.
The Wind-Down Entity has part-time employment agreements with its two executive officers through December 31, 2023. The agreements are
renewed automatically until terminated, subject to the right of either party to terminate the agreement at any time and for any reason on thirty days’ advance written notice.
29
Critical Accounting Policies and Practices
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The accounting policies and practices that the
Company believes are the most critical are discussed below. These accounting policies and practices require management to make decisions on subjective and/or complex matters that may inherently be uncertain. Estimates are required to prepare the
consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Significant estimates, judgments and assumptions are required in a number of areas, including, but not limited to, the general and administrative costs to be incurred until the
completion of the liquidation activities of the Company and estimated reserves for contingent liabilities, including potential construction defect claims and the administration of such claims after the Company’s liquidation activities are
completed. In many instances, changes in the accounting estimates are likely to occur from period to period. Actual results may differ from the estimates. The Company believes the current assumptions and other considerations used in preparing the
consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s net assets in liquidation.
Liquidation Basis of Accounting
Under the Liquidation Basis of Accounting, all assets are recorded at their estimated net realizable value or liquidation value, which
represents the estimated amount of net cash that may be received upon the disposition of the assets (on an undiscounted basis). Liabilities are measured in accordance with U.S. GAAP that otherwise applies to those liabilities. The Company has not
recorded any amount from the future settlement of unresolved Causes of Action in the accompanying consolidated financial statements until an agreement is executed, final court approval is received (if required), and collectability is reasonably
assured. The amounts recovered may be material to the Company’s net assets in liquidation.
Other Assets
The Company recognizes recoveries from the settlement of unresolved Causes of Action when an agreement is executed, and collectability is
reasonably assured. An allowance for uncollectible settlement installment receivables is recorded when there is doubt about the collectability of the receivable. The Company records escrow receivables at the amount that is expected to be received
when the escrow receivable is released. The Forfeited Assets received from the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), other than cash, have been recorded at their estimated net realizable value. The Company accrues expected interest
earnings when it can forecast the interest rate to be paid on its cash on deposit. The measurement of real estate assets is based on current contracts (if any), if contingencies have been removed, estimates and other indications of sales value, net
of estimated selling costs. The performing loan is recorded at the amount of the contractual interest payments and principal repayment of the loan.
In addition, the Company recognizes other amounts to be received based on contractual terms or when the amounts to be received are
certain.
Accrued Liquidation Costs
The estimated costs associated with implementing and completing the Company’s plan of liquidation are recorded as accrued liquidation
costs. The Company has also recorded the estimated remaining development costs and estimated costs to address potential construction defect claims as well as the estimated general and administrative costs to be incurred until the completion of the
liquidation of the Company, and an accrual for the administration of construction defect claims.
Changes in Carrying Value
On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the estimated net realizable values, liquidation costs and the estimated date of the completion
of the liquidation of the Company and records any significant changes. If the Company has a change in its plan for the disposition of an asset, the carrying value will be adjusted to reflect this change in the period that the change is approved.
The change in value may also include a change to the accrued liquidation costs related to the asset.
All changes in the estimated liquidation value of the Company’s assets, real estate held for sale, or other assets and liabilities are
reflected as a change to the Company’s net assets in liquidation.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
| Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Not applicable, as the Company is a “smaller reporting company” within the meaning of Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management and the Liquidation Trustee have evaluated the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, management and the Liquidation Trustee concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period
covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Liquidation
Trustee, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined
in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
In connection with the preparation of our Form 10-Q, our management and the Liquidation Trustee assessed the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. In making that assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on its assessment, our management and the Liquidation Trustee believe that, as of December 31, 2023, our internal control over
financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Below are descriptions of pending litigation. As the Company is the plaintiff in these legal proceedings and does not have the ability to
estimate the ultimate recovery amount until they are settled, and in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy, no recoveries have been recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for these legal proceedings, other than for
settlements for which the Trust has entered into a signed settlement agreement and collectability is reasonably assured.
Goldberg v. Halloran & Sage LLP, et al., Case
No. 19STCV42900 (Cal. Super. Ct., L.A. Cnty., filed Dec. 2, 2019), is an action by the Trust against nine law firms (Halloran & Sage LLP; Balcomb & Green, P.C.; Rome McGuigan, P.C.; Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP; Bailey Cavalieri LLC;
Sidley Austin LLP; Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP; Robinson & Cole LLP; and Finn Dixon & Herling LLP) and 10 individual attorneys (Richard Roberts, Lawrence R. Green, Jon H. Freis, Brian Courtney, Ted Handel, Thomas Geyer, Neal Sullivan,
S. Lee Terry, Jr., Shant Chalian, and Reed Balmer) for conduct in connection with their representation of Robert Shapiro, the Debtors or their affiliates before the commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases, as well as against up to 100 “Doe”
defendants. The conduct challenged in the complaint includes knowingly and/or negligently preparing loan documents and investment agreements with material misstatements and omissions, designing deceptive securities products, preparing incorrect
legal opinion memoranda on which investors relied, and assisting in the creation of nominally third-party borrower entities that were in fact controlled by Robert Shapiro.
| • |
The first set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Halloran & Sage LLP, attorney Richard Roberts, and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (First Count), aiding and
abetting fraud (Second Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Third Count), negligent misrepresentation (Fourth Count), professional negligence (Fifth Count), and aiding and abetting conversion (Sixth Count). These defendants
are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $500 million, as well as for punitive damages.
|
| • |
The second set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Balcomb & Green, P.C., attorney Lawrence R. Green, and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Seventh Count), aiding
and abetting fraud (Eighth Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Ninth Count), negligent misrepresentation (Tenth Count), professional negligence (Eleventh Count), and aiding and abetting conversion (Twelfth Count). These
defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $500 million, as well as for punitive damages.
|
| • |
The third set of counts in the complaint are against attorney Jon H. Freis and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Thirteenth Count), aiding and abetting fraud (Fourteenth Count),
aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Fifteenth Count), negligent misrepresentation (Sixteenth Count), professional negligence (Seventeenth Count), and aiding and abetting conversion (Eighteenth Count). These defendants are alleged
to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $500 million, as well as for punitive damages.
|
| • |
The fourth set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Rome McGuigan, P.C., attorney Brian Courtney, and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Nineteenth Count), aiding and
abetting fraud (Twentieth Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Twenty-First Count), negligent misrepresentation (Twenty-Second Count), professional negligence (Twenty-Third Count), and aiding and abetting conversion
(Twenty-Fourth Count). These defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $500 million, as well as for punitive
damages.
|
| • |
The fifth set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP, attorney Ted Handel, and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Twenty-Fifth Count),
aiding and abetting fraud (Twenty-Sixth Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Twenty-Seventh Count), negligent misrepresentation (Twenty-Eighth Count), professional negligence (Twenty-Ninth Count), and aiding and abetting
conversion (Thirtieth Count). These defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $20 million, as well as for punitive
damages.
|
| • |
The sixth set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Bailey Cavalieri LLC, Thomas Geyer, and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Thirty-First Count), aiding and abetting
fraud (Thirty-Second Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Thirty-Third Count), negligent misrepresentation (Thirty-Fourth Count), professional negligence (Thirty-Fifth Count), and aiding and abetting conversion
(Thirty-Sixth Count). These defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $500 million, as well as for punitive
damages.
|
| • |
The seventh set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Sidley Austin LLP, attorney Neal Sullivan, and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Thirty-Seventh Count), aiding and
abetting fraud (Thirty-Eighth Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Thirty-Ninth Count), negligent misrepresentation (Fortieth Count), professional negligence (Forty-First Count), and aiding and abetting conversion
(Forty-Second Count). These defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $500 million, as well as for punitive
damages.
|
| • |
The eighth set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, attorney S. Lee Terry, Jr., and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Forty-Third Count),
aiding and abetting fraud (Forty-Fourth Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Forty-Fifth Count), negligent misrepresentation (Forty-Sixth Count), professional negligence (Forty-Seventh Count), and aiding and abetting
conversion (Forty-Eighth Count). These defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $200 million, as well as for
punitive damages.
|
| • |
The ninth set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Robinson & Cole LLP, attorney Shant Chalian, and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Forty-Ninth Count), aiding and
abetting fraud (Fiftieth Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Fifty-First Count), negligent misrepresentation (Fifty-Second Count), professional negligence (Fifty-Third Count), and aiding and abetting conversion
(Fifty-Fourth Count). These defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $5 million, as well as for punitive damages.
|
| • |
The tenth set of counts in the complaint are against law firm Finn Dixon & Herling LLP, attorney Reed Balmer, and the “Doe” defendants for aiding and abetting securities fraud (Fifty-Fifth Count), aiding
and abetting fraud (Fifty-Sixth Count), aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Fifty-Seventh Count), negligent misrepresentation (Fifty-Eighth Count), professional negligence (Fifty-Ninth Count), and aiding and abetting conversion
(Sixtieth Count). These defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable for rescission of investors’ purchases of securities and for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $5 million, as well as for punitive damages.
|
| • |
The eleventh set of counts in the complaint are against law firms Halloran & Sage LLP; Balcomb & Green, P.C.; Rome McGuigan, P.C.; Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP; Bailey Cavalieri LLC; Sidley Austin
LLP; Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP; Robinson & Cole LLP; and Finn Dixon & Herling LLP; attorney Jon H. Freis, and the “Doe” defendants for actual-intent fraudulent transfer (Sixty-First Count) and constructive fraudulent transfer
(Sixty-Second Count). These defendants are alleged to be liable for damages in an amount believed to be in excess of $5 million, as well as for provisional remedies, avoidance of the transfers, and punitive damages.
|
The case was designated as a complex matter on December 18, 2019 and was assigned to the Honorable Amy Hogue. On July 11, 2022, the
matter was reassigned to the Honorable Lawrence P. Riff. The following are updates since the initial filing:
| • |
On March 20, 2020, two sets of defendants – Sidley Austin LLP and Neal Sullivan; and Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP and S. Lee Terry, Jr. – filed special motions to strike the portions of the complaint
directed at them under a California statute (Civil Procedure Code section 425.16) that permits defendants to bring early challenges to causes of action against them that allegedly arise from protected litigation activity if those causes of
action lack minimal merit. The defendants that filed these special motions to strike asserted that the claims against them arise from communicative conduct in the course of quasi-judicial proceedings, such as regulatory inquiries, and that
the Trust cannot establish a likelihood of prevailing on its claims against them. The Trust opposed these motions, and the matters were heard on July 28, 2020, and taken under submission on that date. On August 14, 2020, the Court entered
orders: (i) granting the motion to strike filed by Sidley Austin LLP and Neal Sullivan, and (ii) granting in part and denying in part the motion to strike filed by Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP and S. Lee Terry, Jr. In September 2020, the
Trust filed notices of appeal of the foregoing orders, and Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP and S. Lee Terry, Jr. subsequently filed a cross-appeal. On January 27, 2021, the Court entered an order granting, in part, a motion for attorneys’
fees filed by Sidley Austin LLP and Neal Sullivan, pursuant to which the movants were awarded $282,500.00 in fees and $5,600.00 in costs. On March 1, 2021, the Trustee filed a notice of appeal of the order granting fees and costs.
|
| • |
On April 13, 2020, four sets of defendants – Rome McGuigan, P.C. and Brian Courtney; Bailey Cavalieri LLC and Thomas Geyer; Robinson & Cole LLP and Shant Chalian; and Finn Dixon & Herling LLP and Reed
Balmer – filed motions to quash the service of summonses. The defendants that filed these motions asserted that they are not subject to suit in California because they do not have sufficient contacts with California to justify a California
court’s exercise of jurisdiction over them. The Trust opposed these motions, and the matters were heard in part on July 15, 2020 and in part on July 20, 2020, and (with exception of the motion filed by Finn Dixon & Herling LLP and Reed
Balmer) were taken under submission on July 20, 2020. The motion filed by Finn Dixon & Herling LLP, and Reed Balmer was taken off calendar prior to July 20, 2020, and the parties thereafter reached a confidential settlement. On July
21, 2020, the Court entered orders granting the motions to quash filed by Rome McGuigan, P.C. and Brian Courtney; Bailey Cavalieri LLC and Thomas Geyer; and Robinson & Cole LLP and Shant Chalian. On September 10, 2020, the Trust filed
a notice of appeal of the foregoing orders.
|
| • |
On June 16, 2020, the Trust reached a confidential settlement with Balcomb & Green, P.C. and Lawrence R. Green. On July 6, 2020, these defendants filed a motion seeking the Court’s determination that the
settlement was made in good faith under a California statute (Civil Procedure Code section 877.6) that permits settling defendants to seek a good faith settlement finding in order to bar any other defendant from seeking contribution or
indemnity. The motion was unopposed, and the Court entered an order granting it on August 12, 2020.
|
| • |
On September 11, 2020, the Trust reached a settlement with Finn Dixon & Herling LLP and Reed Balmer that resolved all litigation between them.
|
| • |
On January 21, 2021, the Trust reached a confidential settlement with Robinson & Cole LLP and Shant Chalian. As part of that settlement, the appeal of the jurisdictional ruling as to those parties has
been dismissed.
|
| • |
The other appeals remain pending. On June 14, 2021, the Trustee filed a combined opening brief for all of the appeals other than his appeal of the order granting fees and costs to Sidley Austin LLP. Between
September 22 and 29, 2021, the respondents filed their opening briefs. On March 17, 2022, the Trustee filed a combined reply brief for all of the appeals other than his appeal of the order granting fees and costs to Sidley Austin LLP. On
June 30, 2022, Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP filed its reply brief in support of its cross-appeal of the order denying a portion of its special motion to strike. The matter is currently fully briefed and awaiting argument.
|
| • |
While the appeals were pending, the Trust reached a settlement with Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP and Lee Terry on July 29, 2023 for $25.5 million, which amount resulted in proceeds paid to the Trust on
October 2, 2023 of approximately $17.0 million, net of attorneys’ fees. The settlement resolved all litigation between the Trust and Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP and Mr. Terry.
|
| • |
In March 2023, the Trust dismissed its claims against Jon H. Freis.
|
| • |
In April 2023, the Trust reached a settlement with Bailey Cavalieri LLC and Thomas Geyer that resolved all litigation between them.
|
| • |
In June 2023, the Trust reached a settlement with Halloran & Sage and Richard Roberts for the remaining amount of the law firm’s applicable liability insurance policies, which resulted in proceeds paid to
the Trust on August 11, 2023 of approximately $13.2 million, net of attorneys’ fees and other litigation expenses. This settlement resolved all litigation between the Trust and Halloran & Sage and Richard Roberts.
|
| • |
On November 4, 2023, the Trust and law firm Rome McGuigan, P.C. agreed to settle the Trust’s pending litigation against that firm and related defendants for $5.0 million. On January 23, 2024, the court
granted Rome McGuigan, P.C.’s motion to determine that the settlement with the Trust was reached in good faith. Under the terms of the agreement, payment of the settlement is expected on or before February 22, 2024.
|
| • |
On January 19, 2024, The California Court of Appeal issued an appeal affirming the trial court’s orders granting Sidley Austin LLP and Neal Sullivan’s motion to
strike, as well as the order awarding them attorney’s fees. The Trust has elected not to seek further appellate review of this ruling. The attorneys’ fees and costs owed to
Sidley Austin LLP are approximately $290,000, plus (potentially) additional fees in connection with prosecution of the appeal, the amount of which will not be known until Sidley Austin LLP seeks such additional fees and the trial court
considers the issue at some future date.
|
Goldberg v. Rome McGuigan, P.C., et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-09958-JFW-SK (C.D. Cal.). On October 28, 2020, the Trust filed a federal lawsuit against four defendants that prevailed on the motions to quash service of summons in the California state court action (Rome McGuigan, P.C.;
Brian Courtney; Bailey Cavalieri LLC; and Thomas Geyer), as well as a fifth defendant (Ivan Acevedo), and certain “Doe” defendants.” The complaint contains counts for (i) violations of section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5; (i) aiding
and abetting fraud; (iii) aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; (iv) negligent misrepresentation; (v) professional negligence; (vi) aiding and abetting conversion; (vii) actual fraudulent transfer; and (viii) constructive fraudulent
transfer. The conduct challenged in the complaint includes certain of the same conduct challenged in the California state court action, and a footnote in the complaint explains: “Plaintiff filed an action in Los Angeles Superior Court against
[four of these defendants] raising some of the claims asserted in this action. Those defendants filed a motion to quash service, alleging that the court did not have personal jurisdiction. The Court granted those motions, and Plaintiff
appealed. Plaintiff brings this action to preserve his rights and ensure that his claims against [the defendants] are adjudicated on the merits. Should the state court appeal be successful, resulting in two cases being simultaneously litigated
on the merits in two forums, [plaintiff] will consider dismissing this action and litigating the case in state court.” On January 4, 2021, the four defendants from the California state court action filed motions to dismiss this federal lawsuit,
and on March 4, 2021, the court entered an order granting those motions in part by dismissing the first count (arising under the federal securities laws), without ruling on the remaining counts (arising under state law) in light of potential
personal jurisdiction issues. On March 29, 2021, the same four defendants again moved to dismiss the remaining counts for lack of personal jurisdiction. On April 23, 2021, the federal court entered an order granting those motions but has not yet
entered a final judgment. As noted above, in April 2023, the Trust reached a settlement with Bailey Cavalieri LLC and Thomas Geyer that resolved all litigation between them. Also as noted above, on November 4, 2023, the Trust and law firm Rome
McGuigan, P.C. agreed to settle the Trust’s pending litigation against that firm and related defendants for $5.0 million. Upon receipt of the settlement payment, which is expected on or before February 15, 2024, all of the Trust’s claims against
Rome McGuigan, P.C. and related defendants will be resolved.
Avoidance actions. The Trust is currently
prosecuting several legal actions to recover preferential payments, fraudulent transfers, and other funds subject to recovery by the bankruptcy estate. These actions were filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
(the “Bankruptcy Court”), are pending before the Honorable J. Kate Stickles, and generally fall into the following categories:
| • |
Preferential transfers and/or fraudulent transfers (Noteholders and Unitholders).
Certain of the actions include claims arising under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code and seek to
avoid or recover payments made by the Debtors: (1) during the 90 days prior to the December 4, 2017 bankruptcy filing, including payments to miscellaneous vendors and former Noteholders and Unitholders; and/or (2) during the course of the
Ponzi scheme (from July 2012 through the December 4, 2017 bankruptcy filing) for interest paid to former Noteholders and Unitholders.
|
| • |
Fraudulent transfers (Shapiro personal expenses). Two remaining actions include
claims arising under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code and seek to avoid and recover payments made by the Debtors during the course of the Ponzi scheme (from July 2012 through the December 4, 2017 bankruptcy filing) for the personal
expenses of Robert and Jeri Shapiro, including those identified in a forensic report prepared in connection with an SEC enforcement action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
|
| • |
Fraudulent transfers and fraud (against former agents). Certain of the actions,
which arise under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code and applicable state law governing fraudulent transfers, seek to avoid and recover payments made by the Debtors during the course of the Ponzi scheme (from July 2012 through the December
4, 2017 bankruptcy filing) for commissions to former agents, as well as for fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and the unlicensed sale of securities asserted by the Trust based on claims contributed to the Trust by defrauded investors.
These actions were filed by the Trust in the Bankruptcy Court between November 15, 2019 and December 4, 2019. Actions of this type are also being pursued by the SEC, and it is the Trust’s understanding that any recoveries obtained by the
SEC will be transmitted to the Trust pursuant to a Fair Fund established by the SEC.
|
| • |
Fraudulent transfers (Kenneth Halbert). The Trust has pursued fraudulent transfer
claims against Kenneth Halbert to avoid and recover prepetition payments of principal and interest to Mr. Halbert. The Trust filed its initial complaint on December 1, 2019 and the operative first amended complaint on December 7, 2021.
Fact discovery closed on April 24, 2023. Thereafter, on June 27, 2023, the Trust agreed to settle its pending fraudulent transfer claims against Kenneth Halbert. The terms of the settlement are contained in a settlement agreement
between the Trust and Mr. Halbert. Under the agreement, the Trust agreed to dismiss its claims against Mr. Halbert for the sum of $4 million, payable in cash to the Trust. The Trust received the settlement payment on August 15, 2023 and
dismissed the action against Mr. Halbert on August 22, 2023.
|
| • |
Recovery of United States Trustee Fees. On June 6, 2022, the United States Supreme Court determined in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 596 U.S. 464 (2022), that a statutory amendment that imposed a temporary increase in the
United States Trustee fees payable in bankruptcy cases in certain judicial districts (but not in other districts) was unconstitutional as a violation of the uniformity requirement of the Bankruptcy Clause of the United States
Constitution. Following Siegel, certain representatives of bankruptcy estates in the affected
districts filed lawsuits seeking refunds of the incremental amounts paid by those estates for United States Trustee fees in excess of the amounts that would have been paid absent the unconstitutional statutory amendment. On December 29,
2022, the Trust file such a complaint in the Bankruptcy Court against Andrew R. Vara, in his capacity as the United States Trustee for Region 3, Tara Twomey, in her capacity as Director of the Executive Office for United States Trustees,
and the United States Trustee Program (Adv. No. 22-50516). The Complaint seeks a refund in the amount of $1,920,219 in connection with the overpayment of United States Trustee fees during the Bankruptcy Cases. On August 3, 2023, the
Trust filed a motion for summary judgment in this action. On September 29, 2023, the United
States Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006 LLC, No. 22-1238 (U.S.) on the issue of the appropriate remedy for the Constitutional violation identified in Siegel, which issue affects the numerous cases throughout the affected districts in which unconstitutional United States Trustee fees were assessed and paid. Prior to the deadline for the United
States Trustee defendants in the Trust’s refund lawsuit to respond to the Trust’s motion for summary judgment, the parties entered into a stipulation staying the Trust’s action until the Supreme Court renders a decision in the Hammons case. Oral argument before the Supreme Court in the Hammons case took place on January 9, 2024. As of the date hereof, a decision by the Supreme Court has not been issued and, as such, the
Trust’s action remains stayed. As a result, at this time, the Trust is unable to determine if any refund will be obtained or the timing of any such refund.
|
The Trust has filed over 400 legal actions of this nature, many of which have been resolved, resulting in recoveries by or
judgments in favor of the Trust. As of February 12, 2024, 34 of these legal actions remain pending.
Since inception and as of February 12, 2024, the Trust has entered into settlements in approximately 237 legal actions and
approximately 245 potential avoidance claims for which litigation was not filed, resulting in aggregate settlements of approximately $22.48 million of cash payments made or due to the Trust and approximately $11.28 million in reductions of
claims against the Trust.
Additionally, as of February 12, 2024, the Trust has obtained judgments of approximately $169.07 million, including
default judgments of approximately $152.89 million and stipulated judgments of approximately $16.18 million. It is unknown at this time how much, if any, will ultimately be collected on these judgments, as stipulated and default judgments are
commonly obtained where the defendant has insufficient assets, if any, to satisfy a judgment.
Other legal proceedings. In addition, other
legal proceedings were prosecuted by the Trust and United States governmental authorities, which actions resulted in recoveries in favor of the Trust. Such actions include:
| • |
Actions regarding the Shapiro’s personal assets. On December 4, 2019, the Trust
filed an action in the Bankruptcy Court, Adv. Pro. No. 10-51076 (BLS), Woodbridge Liquidation Trust v. Robert Shapiro, Jeri Shapiro, 3X a Charm, LLC,
Carbondale Basalt Owners, LLC, Davana Sherman Oaks Owners, LLC, In Trend Staging, LLC, Midland Loop Enterprises, LLC, Schwartz Media Buying Company, LLC and Stover Real Estate Partners LLC. In this action, the Trust asserts claims under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code and applicable state law for avoidance of preferential and fraudulent transfers together with claims for fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, the
unlicensed sale of securities, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. The Trust seeks to recover damages and assets held in the names of Robert Shapiro, Jeri Shapiro and their family members and entities owned or controlled by
them, which assets the Trust contends are beneficially owned by the Debtors or for which the Debtors are entitled to recover based on the Shapiros’ defalcations, including over $20 million in avoidable transfers. On February 4, 2022, the
Trust entered into a Settlement Agreement with Ms. Jeri Shapiro resolving the Trust’s adversary proceeding against Ms. Shapiro. In connection with the Settlement Agreement, Ms. Shapiro responded to interrogatories from the Trust and
submitted a declaration under penalty of perjury detailing her lack of assets. Upon execution of the Settlement Agreement, Ms. Shapiro executed and delivered a Stipulated Judgment for approximately $20.6 million that will be held by the
Trust in escrow for three years that can be entered without notice if the Trust learns Ms. Shapiro’s representations in her declaration were false or materially inaccurate. Additionally, Ms. Shapiro authorized the Trust to expunge the
filed claims of certain co-defendants for entities she was listed as an officer and turned over payments to the Trust that were received by certain co-defendants in the adversary proceeding. A stipulation of dismissal (as to Ms. Shapiro
only) was entered on April 1, 2022.
|
| • |
Criminal proceeding and forfeiture. In connection with the United States’
criminal case against Robert Shapiro (Case No. No. 19-20178-CR-ALTONAGA (S.D. Fla. 2019)), Shapiro agreed to the forfeiture of certain assets. The Trust filed a petition in the Florida court to claim the Forfeited Assets as property of
the Debtors’ estates, and therefore as property that had vested in the Trust pursuant to the Plan. The Trust has entered into an agreement with the United States Department of Justice to resolve its claim. The agreement was approved by
the Bankruptcy Court on September 17, 2020 and was approved by the United States District Court on October 1, 2020. Among other things, the agreement provides for the release of specified Forfeited Assets by the United States to the
Trust, and for the Trust to liquidate those assets and distribute the net sale proceeds to Qualifying Victims, which include the vast majority of Trust beneficiaries—specifically, all former holders of Class 3 and 5 claims under the Plan
and their permitted assigns—but do not include former holders of Class 4 claims under the Plan. The Trust has taken possession of the Forfeited Assets and has sold the wine, gold, clothing, handbags, shoes and an automobile. A
substantial majority of the jewelry and art have also been sold.
|
Wind-Down Group litigation. The Wind-Down Group
owned a portfolio of real estate assets, which included secured loans and other properties. As part of its recovery efforts, the Wind-Down Group, through its subsidiaries, is involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to such assets.
Among other litigation, certain Woodbridge entities (including the Trust, the Wind-Down Entity, and WB 8607 Honoapiilani, LLC) filed an action against Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging that the
defendant insurer breached its obligations under an insurance policy purchased to protect a property owned by WB 8607 Honoapiilani (a subsidiary of the Wind-Down Entity) in Hawaii, which property was destroyed by fire in August 2017. The
Superior Court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and on March 25, 2021 entered judgment in favor of the defendant. The judgment provided that plaintiffs take nothing by way of the complaint. Further, the judgment provided
that defendant refund plaintiffs for the premium payments under the insurance policy at issue in the lawsuit ($110,829.43), less all amounts paid by the defendant in respect of claims under the policy ($97,770.38) and less defendant’s costs
(defendant requested costs of $9,874.71). Plaintiffs appealed the judgment. The appeal was fully briefed and oral argument took place before the Court of Appeal on November 21, 2022. After extending its time to rule on the submitted matter, the
Court of Appeal entered its ruling on April 19, 2023. In an unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court and awarded costs on appeal to the respondent Underwriters. Although the Wind Down Entity had a right
to petition the California Supreme Court for review, such petitions are rarely granted, and counsel did not believe that there was a realistic chance that the petition would be granted, particularly since the Court of Appeal opinion is
unpublished and would not be citable precedent in California. As such, the Court of Appeal opinion became final 30 days after entry, on May 19, 2023.
| Item 1A. |
Risk Factors
|
Please see the applicable risks in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 28, 2023.
| Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
In accordance with the Plan, all Liquidation Trust Interests have been issued without registration under the Securities Act. The
Liquidation Trust Interests have been issued only to holders of allowed claims in Class 3, Class 4, and Class 5 under the Plan entirely in exchange for such claims. See “Item 1. Business - D. Plan Provisions Regarding the Company - 2. Treatment under the Plan of holders of claims against and equity interests in the Debtors” of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 28, 2023. During the period from February 15, 2019 (inception) through December 31, 2023, the Trust has issued an aggregate of 11,543,781 Class A Interests and an aggregate of 677,790 Class B Interests.
As of December 31, 2023, the Trust had 11,514,662 Class A Interests and 675,617 Class B Interests outstanding. All Liquidation Trust Interests were issued on the Plan Effective Date or from time to time thereafter as soon as practicable as and
when claims in Class 3, Class 4 or Class 5 have become allowed.
During the three months ended December 31 2023, the Trust issued the following Liquidation Trust Interests:
|
Date of Sale
|
Number of
Class A
Interests Sold
|
Number of
Class B
Interests Sold
|
Nature of the
Transaction
|
Consideration
Received
|
|||||||
|
October 26, 2023
|
83.68
|
-
|
Allowance of claims
|
Allowance of claims
|
|||||||
The issuance of Liquidation Trust Interests has occurred in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act afforded by Section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 1145(a)(1) exempts the offer and sale of securities under a plan of reorganization from registration under the Securities Act and state securities laws and regulation if
(i) the securities are offered and sold under a plan of reorganization and are securities of the debtor, of an affiliate of the debtor participating in a joint plan with the debtor, or of a successor to the debtor under the plan; (ii) the
recipients of the securities hold a pre-petition or administrative claim against the debtor or an interest in the debtor; and (iii) the securities are issued entirely in exchange for the recipient’s claim against or interest in the debtor, or
principally in such exchange and partly for cash or property. The Trust believes that the Liquidation Trust Interests are securities of a “successor” to the Debtors within the meaning of Section 1145(a)(1), and such securities were issued under the
Plan entirely in exchange for allowed claims in Class 3, Class 4, and Class 5 under the Plan.
| Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
| Item 4. |
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
None.
Exhibit Number and Description
|
First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation of Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC and its Affiliated Debtors dated August 22, 2018, incorporated herein by reference to the
Registration Statement on Form 10 filed by the Trust on October 25, 2019.
|
|
|
Certificate of Trust of Woodbridge Liquidation Trust dated February 14 and effective February 15, 2019, incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed by
the Trust on October 25, 2019.
|
|
|
Liquidation Trust Agreement of Woodbridge Liquidation Trust dated February 15, 2019, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated August 21, 2019 and Amendment No. 2 dated September 13, 2019,
incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed by the Trust on October 25, 2019.
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Liquidation Trust Agreement dated as of November 1, 2019, incorporated herein by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Trust on November 9, 2023.
|
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Liquidation Trust Agreement dated as of February 5, 2020, incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Trust on February 6, 2020.
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Woodbridge Liquidation Trust effective August 21, 2019, incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed by the Trust on
October 25, 2019.
|
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC dated February 15, 2019, incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed by the
Trust on October 25, 2019.
|
|
|
First Amendment to Limited Liability Agreement of Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC dated November 30, 2022, incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Trust on December 1, 2022.
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Limited Liability Agreement of Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC dated as of March 27, 2023, incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by
the Trust on March 29, 2023.
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Limited Liability Agreement of Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC dated as of April 28, 2023, incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by
the Trust on May 1, 2023.
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated November 12, 2019 between Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC and Marion W. Fong, incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on
Form 10 filed by the Trust on December 13, 2019.
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated September 24, 2020 between Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC and Marion W. Fong, incorporated herein by reference to the Form 10-K filed by the
Trust on September 28, 2020.
|
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated November 12, 2019 between Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC and Marion W. Fong, incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
on Form 10 filed by the Trust on December 13, 2019.
|
|
|
Part-Time Employment Agreement dated November 30, 2022 between Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity and Marion W. Fong, incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by
the Trust on December 1, 2022.
|
|
Employment Agreement dated November 12, 2019 between Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC and David Mark Kemper, incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
on Form 10 filed by the Trust on December 13, 2019.
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated September 24, 2020 between Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC and David Mark Kemper, incorporated herein by reference to the Form 10-K filed by
the Trust on September 28, 2020.
|
|
|
Part-Time Employment Agreement dated November 30, 2022 between Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity and David Mark Kemper, incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
by the Trust on December 1, 2022.
|
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated November 12, 2019 between Woodbridge Wind-Down Entity LLC and David Mark Kemper, incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form 10 filed
by the Trust on December 13, 2019.
|
|
|
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement between the United States and Woodbridge Liquidation Trust, as approved by order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
entered September 17, 2020, incorporated herein by reference to the Form 10-K filed by the Trust on September 28, 2020.
|
|
|
Settlement Agreement dated August 6, 2021 by and among Mark Baker, Jay Beynon as Trustee for the Jay Beynon Family Trust DTD 10/23/1998, Alan and Marlene Gordon, Joseph C. Hull, Lloyd and
Nancy Landman, and Lilly A. Shirley on behalf of themselves and the proposed Settlement Class, Michael I. Goldberg, as Trustee for Woodbridge Liquidation Trust, and Comerica Bank, incorporated herein by reference to the Form 10-K filed by
the Trust on September 27, 2021.
|
|
|
Certification of Liquidation Trustee pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Certification of Liquidation Trustee pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Confirming the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation of Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC and its Affiliated Debtors, entered
October 26, 2018, incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed by the Trust on October 25, 2019.
|
|
|
101
|
The following financial statements from the Woodbridge Liquidation Trust Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2023, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting
Language (XBRL): (i) consolidated statements of net assets in liquidation as of December 31, 2023 and June 30, 2023, (ii) consolidated statements of changes in net assets in liquidation for the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022,
(iii) consolidated statements of changes in net assets in liquidation for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 and (iv) the notes to the consolidated financial statements. XBRL Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive
Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
|
|
104
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (Formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
|
*Filed herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust
|
||
|
Date: February 12, 2024
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael I. Goldberg
|
|
Michael I. Goldberg,
|
||
|
Liquidation Trustee
|
||
42
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Liquidation Trustee pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Michael I. Goldberg, certify that:
| 1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Woodbridge Liquidation Trust;
|
| 2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
| 3. |
Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the net assets in liquidation and changes in net
assets in liquidation of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
| 4. |
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
|
| a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
| b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
| c) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
| d) |
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
|
| 5. |
I have disclosed, based on my recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
|
| a) |
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
| b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Date: February 12, 2024
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael I. Goldberg
|
|
Michael I. Goldberg,
|
||
|
Liquidation Trustee
|
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of Liquidation Trustee pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Woodbridge Liquidation Trust (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2023, as filed with
the Securities and exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael I. Goldberg, Trustee of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:
| 1. |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| 2. |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the net assets in liquidation and changes in net assets in liquidation of the Registrant.
|
|
Date: February 12, 2024
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael I. Goldberg
|
|
Michael I. Goldberg,
|
||
|
Liquidation Trustee
|