Good day, and welcome to the Blackstone Secured Lending First Quarter 2024 Investor Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Stacy Wang, Head of Shareholder Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Katie. Good morning, and welcome to Blackstone Secure Lending Fund's First Quarter Conference Call. Joining me today are Brad Marshall and Jonathan Bock, Co-Chief Executive Officers; Carlos Whitaker, President; and Teddy Desloge, Chief Financial Officer. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release and slide presentation of our results and filed our 10-Q both of which are available on the Shareholders section of our website, www.bxsl.com. We will be referring to that presentation throughout today's call. I'd like to remind you that today's call may include forward-looking statements, which are uncertain, outside of the firm's control and may differ materially from actual results. We do not undertake any duty to update these statements. For some of the risks that could affect results, please see the Risk Factors section of our most recent annual report on Form 10-K. This audio cast is copyright material of Blackstone and may not be duplicated without consent. With that, I'd like to turn over the call to Brad Marshall.

Thank you, Stacy, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining our call this morning. So turning to this morning's agenda, I'm going to start with some high-level thoughts before Jon, Carlos and Teddy go into some more details around our portfolio and this quarter's results. BXSL reported another strong quarter of results, including net investment income, or NII, of $0.87 per share, representing a 13.1% annualized return on equity. Our NII per share was impacted by $0.02 per share from accrued capital gains incentive fees. These results reflect continued strong credit performance with a minimal nonaccrual rate of 0.1% and at cost. And a robust 11.8% weighted average yield on debt investments, benefiting from the current elevated rate environment. We also had the second best quarter since our IPO from an earnings standpoint with net income of $0.96 per share, which resulted in a NAV per share increase to $26.87. Our distribution of $0.77 per share is well covered at 113% and represents an 11.5% annualized distribution yield, one of the highest among our traded BDC peers with as much of their portfolio invested in first lien senior secured assets with BXSL at 98.5%. Moving to Slide 5. As we discussed last quarter, we've been positioning BXSL for an anticipated ramp-up in deal activity. We saw the start of that cycle in the fourth quarter, which has continued into the first quarter of this year. We had nearly $1.2 billion in new investment commitments at par, which was the most active quarter since 2021. Further, we had $719 million of fundings, 98% of which were into first lien senior secured debt and overall had an average LTV of 44.5%. This reflects our continued focus on first lien debt investments in high-quality companies with what we believe are better risk-adjusted returns. Additionally, new transactions for the quarter had a weighted average spread of approximately 570 basis points with an average OID of 174 basis points. And over 2 years of call protection, representing approximately 11.4% all-in yield to maturity. Our commitment activity during the quarter aligns with the focus on our high conviction investment themes. We leveraged BXCI's incumbent relationships to originate opportunities in attractive industries. For example, IT services and software, benefiting from a wide network of internal sources, including a public portfolio of over 2,700 credits and from our existing portfolio in BXSL of over 250 private companies. Our repayment activity was partially in industries that may experience more cyclicality, including electrical equipment and energy equipment and services, a portfolio rotation that we believe supports ongoing quality. Just looking at the past 2 quarters collectively, we have seen more commitment activity than the preceding 7 quarters combined and see this momentum carrying through into the second quarter as BXCI utilizes our global platform, including BXCI's expanded European credit platform and seeks to create what we believe to be quality deal flow for our investors. And despite a period of slower M&A activity, we see our continued deal flow being driven from 4 primary factors. First, BXSL benefits from having positions across 210 portfolio companies that, in the absence of being sold, may look to grow through debt and equity finance acquisitions. Second, with BXCI's incumbency across over 4,500 issuers globally, we believe our scale and existing relationships helped to drive deal flow. In fact, approximately 65% of BXSL's Q1 fundings were to incumbent borrowers of BXCI. Third, we have deepened our focus on specialization across sectors that we believe have long-term tailwinds. For example, in April, we opened a new credit office alongside our Life Science private equity colleagues in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Where our Global Head of Healthcare, Brad Coleman, along with colleague, Jonathan Brayman, will expand our presence. This is an area that is highly specialized and in great need of knowledgeable expertise. Finally, we continue to hear from companies that seek services offered by BXCI's value creation program during a period of heightened inflation. While the services we provide are not a silver bullet, they can be quite additive. And as such, we believe a partnership with Blackstone is valued by sponsors in the market. You'll hear more from the team, but I'm particularly excited about the overall quality of our earnings, the continued improvement in NAV, and our ability to lean into the pipeline to drive income for our investors. With that, I'll pass it over to my colleague, Jonathan.

Thank you, Brad, and let's jump to Slide 6. We ended the quarter with $10.4 billion of investments, an increase from $9.9 billion in Q4. This resulted in a modest increase in ending leverage of 1.03x and an average leverage of approximately 0.98x, given the timing of some of our investment fundings. We maintain our strong liquidity position at $1.4 billion comprised of cash and available borrowing capacity across our revolving credit facilities, including ABLs to lean into that expanded pipeline that Brad mentioned. The weighted average base rates over the quarter expanded approximately 50 bps on our nearly 99% floating rate debt portfolio compared to Q1 last year as rates remained elevated. While spreads have modestly compressed, the weighted average all-in yield on debt investments at fair value remains attractive at 11.8% this quarter compared to 12% last quarter. New investments continue to be accretive to our net investment income. The yield on new debt investment fundings and assets sold and repaid during the quarter averaged 11.4% and 11.9%, respectively. Now let's take a look at the portfolio, jump to Slide 7. Approximately 99% of BXSL investments are in first lien new secured loans and 99% of those loans are with companies owned by financial sponsors who have significant equity value in these capital structures, demonstrated by an average loan-to-value of 47.8%. As Brad noted, our nonaccruals are still at only 0.1% at cost. Our portfolio also starts from a strong LTM EBITDA base averaging $193 million, a 6% increase from last year. This is more than 2x larger than the private credit market, where we also see continued strength and performance from larger companies, the bedrock of our portfolio relative to their smaller EBITDA counterparts in both growth and defaults. BXSL's portfolio, as compared to the broader private credit market measured by the Lincoln International private markets database, has seen growth rates in line with the broader market and over 15% more profitability on an LTM EBITDA margin basis. Now we continue to stress the importance of interest coverage. The LTM EBITDA coverage based on average LTM EBITDA for BXSL portfolio companies over the last 12 months was 1.6x in Q1, which again compares favorably to the Lincoln database for the broader private credit market at 1.4x average coverage in Q1. On an LTM basis, only 2.4% of the portfolio has interest coverage below 1x versus 16% for the broader private credit market, of which 75% of this population represents companies with EBITDA less than $50 million. Now further Slide 8, this focuses on our industry exposure. In Q1, the number of portfolio companies in BXSL increased to 210. While we maintain nearly 90% of exposure to historically lower default rate industries, including nearly 40% of funded deals to new portfolio companies in software and IT services, our top conviction areas, as we continue to build out expertise, as Brad mentioned. Now I'll conclude with a point on amendment activity. Amendment activity continues to be relatively benign as the performance of the portfolio remains strong. In the first quarter, there were 45 amendments for BXL private investments, the vast majority of which were associated with add-on DTL extensions or other technical matters. With that I'd like to turn it over to Carlos.

Thanks, Jon. To expand on Brad's point regarding deal activity, I'd like to take a few minutes to dive into a new deal for the quarter, a $2 billion debt financing for Park Place, a leading provider of third-party maintenance for data centers and an incumbent portfolio company that we know well. This marked one of the largest private financings to take out syndicated debt in the quarter. BXCI not only led, but also committed, along with third parties, 90% of the total financing package across the capital structure. We believe several key differentiating factors allowed BXCI to win the deal. First, scale. BXCI has the ability to commit quickly in size, taking down the vast majority of a very scaled loan package, something we believe few in the market can match. Second, incumbency. We've leveraged BXCI's existing anchor position in a syndicated loan and strong relationship with the sponsor. Third, value creation. As an existing position for BXCI, Park Place has been a telling story for our value creation program. The borrower was introduced to Blackstone portfolio companies through cross-sell as a preferred provider and became active in a number of portfolio companies and had already experienced the benefits of our partnership approach. Fourth, deep diligence and sector knowledge. We utilized our internal Blackstone expertise, technologists and differentiated market insights and data centers along with strong prior institutional knowledge of Park Place. In fact, digital infrastructure, particularly data centers, is one of our highest conviction investment themes across Blackstone. With $50 billion of data centers owned or under construction globally, which also includes QTS, the largest data center company in North America today. Finally, flexibility. BXCI offered a one-stop service with multiple tranches of debt, creating ample flexibility best suited for Park Place's needs. In an increasingly competitive private credit market, we believe we differentiate ourselves as not just a lender, but also a value-added partner helping credits grow equity value. BXSL borrowers are offered full access to BXCI's value creation program through cross-sell opportunities, cost savings, procurement and capabilities, including cybersecurity and data science, all at no additional cost, because we understand the end benefit to the investment portfolio. And with that, I'll turn it to Teddy.

Thanks, Carlos. I'll start with our operating results on Slide 10. In the first quarter, BXSL's net investment income was $166 million and $0.87 per share. While our total investment income remained consistent with Q4, net investment income on a dollar basis decreased primarily as a result of a full quarter impact of the fee waiver, which expired near the end of October and capital gains-based incentive fees accrued in the first quarter. BXSL recorded its highest quarterly GAAP net income and second highest in per-share terms since the IPO at $184 million and $0.96 per share, respectively, up 12% from a year ago. Total investment income for the quarter was up $39 million or 15% year-over-year, driven by increased interest income, primarily due to higher interest rates. It is important to highlight the high quality of our earnings as interest income, excluding PIK, fees, and dividends, represented approximately 93% of total investment income in the quarter. Turning to the balance sheet on Slide 11. We ended the quarter with $10.4 billion of total portfolio investments at fair value, $5.3 billion of outstanding debt and approximately $5.2 billion of total net assets. With our strong earnings in excess of the distribution in the quarter, as well as healthy fundamentals and tightening spreads supporting asset values, NAV per share increased to $26.87 up from $26.66 last quarter. This represented the sixth consecutive quarter of NAV per share growth. Moving to Slide 12. In addition, we saw the fourth consecutive quarter of commitment growth, as Brad outlined, with BXSL committing to nearly $1.2 billion in the quarter, funding $719 million and an estimated additional $347 million committed by BXCI and earmarked for BXSL as of March 31. We expect to see continued momentum through the second quarter and into the back half of the year. Repayments remained relatively muted at $181 million in the quarter or a 7% annualized repayment rate. Next, Slide 13 outlines what we believe to be our attractive and diverse liability profile, which includes 53% of drawn debt in unsecured bonds. Our unsecured bonds have a weighted average fixed coupon of less than 3%, which we view as a key advantage in this elevated rate environment and contributed to an overall weighted average interest rate on our borrowings of 5.1%. This compares to a weighted average yield at fair value on our debt investments of 11.8%. Additionally, we have no maturities on our liabilities until 2026 and our debt and funding facilities have an overall weighted average maturity of 3.2 years. The strength of BXSL's funding profile has been recognized by rating agencies as well. We previously noted that BXSL earned an improved outlook for Moody's to Baa3 positive. And this quarter, we earned a notch upgrade from Fitch to BBB flat. We ended the quarter with $1.4 billion of liquidity in cash and undrawn debt available to borrow, providing us with significant capacity for continued portfolio growth. Ending leverage at March 31 was 1.03x, up from 1x at year-end. We have positioned our balance sheet to have what we believe is ample capital to deploy into what we expect will be a growing opportunity set through year-end. In closing, we are moving forward from what we believe is a position of strength. With underlying earnings power, credit performance, investment capabilities and an optimized balance sheet that distinguish us in the market. We will strive to remain laser-focused on delivering returns and protecting investors' capital. With that, I'll ask the operator to open up for questions.

We'll go first to Melissa Wedel with JPMorgan.

Definitely took your point about the higher volume and level of activity in the first quarter and that you're looking for that to continue into the second quarter. Point of clarification on that. Is that on a gross basis? Or are you also expecting net originations to remain elevated? Certainly, noting that repayment activity was particularly low. It seems in relation to gross originations in the first quarter.

Melissa, it's Brad. I'll take that question. When we talk about origination, obviously, we're talking about both on a gross basis, but really what grows the portfolios, as you point out, on a net basis. And we continue to expect that the portfolio will grow on a net basis on deals that are repaying; they feel somewhat muted or we're kind of extending our exposure. There's a little bit less turnover in the market right now. And on the gross basis, we're just seeing more and more capital solutions that we're able to provide for issuance right now.

Okay. I appreciate that. Following up on the level of activity during the quarter. I'm wondering if there was anything in terms of a timing impact that we should think about, whether originations were skewed towards the end of the quarter or it was more evenly distributed versus timing of repayment?

Yes. No, you hit the nail on the head. It was definitely skewed to the end of the quarter, which is why you saw leverage at quarter end higher than what the average leverage was and some of the commitments spilled over into the second quarter.

Got it. Have you estimated the potential impact on NII from that timing during the quarter?

No, we haven't quantified it.

We'll go next to Mark Hughes with Truist.

You talked about the spreads being compressed a bit. I wonder if you could quantify that at all of the kind of your typical spread in Q1 versus what you might anticipate on the deals that are in the pipeline now?

Yes, we've observed some spread compression in certain areas, while other areas have shown no compression at all. It really varies based on the type of deal, whether it's a club deal or a proprietary deal affecting the spreads. In the fourth quarter, our rate on new deals was around 11.7%, and now it's 11.4%. If we consider the yield on a 3-year basis, it comes closer to 12%. The assets we engaged with this quarter had yields ranging from 11% to 13%, illustrating that the deal type plays a significant role. It's worth noting that the spread per unit of risk has decreased when compared to 2021. As interest rates rise, companies are opting for slightly less leverage and structuring deals with lower loan-to-value ratios, keeping the spread per unit of risk relatively stable. Moving forward, we expect to see a continuation of this range, with some deals around 11% and others exceeding 12%. Overall, since the beginning of the year, the market has experienced approximately 50 to 75 basis points of spread compression.

You mentioned that more of your existing portfolio companies are engaging in mergers and acquisitions. Is this an indication of a strong pipeline where current companies are increasing their borrowing for M&A purposes? Or is it simply an ongoing trend?

I think what you're seeing is sponsors are holding onto their assets for longer. So you're seeing less sale processes. So they're looking at their existing assets and trying to find ways to grow them either operationally or through acquisition. So we've seen more companies look for growth capital in order to grow their businesses. So I expect that to continue for the balance of the year. But the other part of kind of what we're trying to do is look across our broader portfolio and see where private capital solutions are better, a better solution for the company versus the public debt that they may have trading in the market today. So that was the example Carlos went through with Park Place; we just came up with a better mousetrap and better capital structure for their long-term growth objectives. And that's kind of what's driving a lot of our deal flow, this ability to use our scale, go into the market, create deals. So while maybe others are seeing more muted deal activity, our deal activity is really starting to accelerate.

We'll go next to Paul Johnson with KBW.

Last quarter, you mentioned identifying around 100 potential deals in the market that presented opportunities for repricing or moving away from the syndicated market. It seems you have capitalized on some of those. How many of those deals do you think you executed this quarter? Do you still have a number of those opportunities available today?

Paul, this is Bock. So I would say if we're thinking about the tighter spread environment and you recall comments from the prior call, this is essentially where we're using incumbency to our advantage, right? And the goal is to retain the assets that are more susceptible to repayments as a result of the tightening spread environment. Those are loans that have either above-market spreads, they've outperformed, and it's where we have call protection generally that's rolled off. Now in those situations, we'll often agree to new terms for an existing portfolio company, and that includes market or above current liquid market spreads and also received extended call protection among a few other improvements. And so to get to the question this quarter, it's about less than 4% of the portfolio had some spread tightening as a result of that at around 50 to 60 basis points on average. We received an additional 1.5 years of call protection. So still well within the range of new unitranche financings on companies that we know and like I would say that, that was rather muted. And more importantly, as we continue to drive additional flow throughout our broad origination framework, it's a nice complement to ensure that we're retaining attractive assets at the same time to Brad's comment growing into new portfolio companies as well.

And maybe just talk about the pipeline. So we go through this exercise of trying to identify deals like Park Place, maybe it's in our public portfolio, maybe it's somewhere else in our private portfolio, and create those what we call reverse kind of origination. So ideas that we're reversing into the sponsor of the company. At the start of the year, we had 98 of those that we were working through. And we're still chipping our way through that list. Not all of them will resonate; not all of them will work out like Park Place did. But there's a pretty healthy kind of backlog of those deals that we're doing diligence on and negotiating with private equity sponsors.

That's very helpful. And then last one for me is just, I guess, kind of general outlook on net leverage for the year. Activity is obviously hard to predict, and that took a lot of capacity for growth. But kind of given the environment, do you have any preference in terms of where you're sort of operating at in terms of your leverage range?

Yes. So we ended the quarter right above one turn, so near the low end of the range. I would say we've taken some intentional steps here to build capacity to deploy and what we see is a growing opportunity set, both from a volume standpoint and the fact that at 11.4% new investment yield, that's very accretive to our dividend. So we have quite a bit of capacity to deploy. I don't think there's any change in message in terms of leverage target; sort of 1 to 1.25 is what we've said historically, and I'd expect that we're in the range through the back half of the year.

We'll go next to Ken Lee with RBC.

Just one on the liability side. How do you think about the outlook for the potential funding mix on the liability side, especially given the rates outlook? I just wanted to see some of the thoughts there.

Yes, we have a lot of optionality today. Bock mentioned at $1.4 billion of liquidity, no maturities this year. We have 53% of our exposure today that's in unsecured bonds. We have seen pretty bit of tightening in the market. For example, our 5-year bond is at sort of 160 over treasury today; that's in 65 bps versus the BDC index of closer to 215. So that is relative to even secured liabilities is historically kind of near all-time tights just from a spread perspective. So significant optionality. We'll be opportunistic with them. We do have liabilities that were put in place a couple of years ago at an average cost of capital of sub-200 million, so we have that to grow into as well.

I understand. Great. I have one follow-up regarding the pipeline and the activity you're observing. Can you clarify if most of it is focused on growth capital, or are you seeing a lot of refinancing activity? I would like to get a bit more detailed information on that.

Sure, Ken. Yes, it's a mix of public to privates, add-on activity in existing portfolio companies, some refinancings out of the public markets, some refinancing out of the private markets. I would say it's a pretty healthy balance between all of those. I would say what's lagging is just regular way sponsor-to-sponsor M&A activity. But even that, we've seen an inflection point probably about 3 weeks ago in terms of that volume starting to pick up. You won't see it; it takes a while for these deals to happen for another quarter or so, but that activity is really starting to pick up as well.

We'll go next to Robert Dodd with Raymond James.

I've got a question on PIK, correct? So pick this quarter stepped up again. It's about a little north of 6.5% of total investment income, roughly slightly less than double where it was a year ago. Can you give us any color on the drivers there? I mean how much of that is structured this PIK versus modified PIK versus, obviously benefits to just modified that, that was a while ago. So maybe give us any color on the drivers for that direction.

Yes, you're right. 6.5% of income in Q1 was PIK. That was up modestly over last quarter. Nearly all of that was driven by one issuer that previously did have PIK flexibility through Q3 that was part of the original deal. We did agree to extend that beginning in Q1. That company, by the way, has almost tripled EBITDA since we closed. If you look at our PIK concentration, 5 companies represent about 85% of PIK exposure; all of those were originally set up with partial PIK flexibility. And we would characterize them as performing; they're all marked sort of high 90s, above 97%. So I think as a tool in certain cases, that we will use to differentiate versus the syndicated market. That can come in a couple of different forms. But overall, our PIK activity was fairly concentrated on performing assets.

Robert, those companies that are picking, they're not 100% PIK. So if their coupon is 12%, 80% of that is being paid in cash, and more like 20% is picking.

Got it. Since you mentioned Park Place, it's now a $2 billion facility. Three years ago, it was a first and second lien of $1 billion with a blended spread of about $575 million. Now, it’s $2 billion with a dividend taken out and a blended spread of around $525 million. Can you explain your thought process regarding that change? I don’t believe the leverage has increased, but I am curious why you transitioned from second lien to unitranche for that structure. It seems like there are benefits, especially with the dividend taken out, a lower spread, and potentially less ID as well. Is the business significantly better today compared to three years ago?

That's not entirely correct, Robert. We actually have a first lien and preferred capital structure in place. Previously, it was an all cash pay for a second lien capital structure. The company is still growing and requires growth capital. Therefore, we approached them and proposed a first lien security with a substantial preferred that is 100% PIK behind it, allowing them to free up cash flow to continue growth and providing them with additional capital for acquisitions. This strategy was beneficial for them in two ways: it created a more flexible capital structure and significantly increased their cash flow. The junior portion of that capital structure is associated with higher-risk funds, while the first lien is part of our lower-risk strategy. I wouldn't describe it as unitranche; it is a first lien plus PIK preferred. Additionally, I'd like to mention the impressive momentum in data centers, which presents a significant opportunity. Blackstone, through QTS and Digital Realty, has around $100 billion in equity invested in data centers. We are strategically aligned with assets like Park Place, and we believe the long-term trends in this sector are substantial. This area has been highlighted as one of Blackstone's key investment focus points, as mentioned by Jon Gray in previous earnings calls, and we are very optimistic about it.

Thank you. We'll take our final question from Casey Alexander with Compass Point.

I'm curious about the deal activity over the past couple of years. During that time, while you were expanding in software, there was a lot of software in the market. Has the industry composition of the deals being introduced shifted? If it has, which industries are you identifying opportunities in? Additionally, where does it seem like private equity is focusing as we potentially enter a new cycle of deal flow?

Yes. I wouldn't say there's any significant change in our focus over the last couple of years. What we have is a more intentional emphasis on quality, specifically targeting larger companies in the right segments of the market. Currently, we are in a phase where inflation has eased somewhat; however, we are observing a slowdown in growth across the economy. For example, in direct lending, default rates indicate that some cyclical, capital-intensive businesses are experiencing rates above 4%, while services and software have rates below 2%. This trend shows where most of the capital is being directed, both from a credit and equity standpoint.

With no additional questions in queue. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back over to Ms. Wang for any additional or closing remarks.

That would be all. Thank you all for joining us this quarter. We look forward to speaking to you next quarter. Thanks, everyone. Goodbye.