Canadian Natural Resources Ltd Q3 FY2025 Earnings Call
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)
Call artefacts
No matching 8-K earnings release linked yet.
No 10-Q stored for this quarter yet.
Call audio is not captured yet.
A slide deck is not captured yet.
Transcript
Auto-generated speakersGood morning. We would like to welcome everyone to Canadian Natural's 2025 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. Please note that this call is being recorded today, November 6, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Mountain Time. I would now like to turn the meeting over to your host for today's call, Lance Casson, Manager of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator. Good morning. Thanks for joining Canadian Natural's 2025 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. As always, I'd like to remind you of our forward-looking statements, and it should be noted that in our reporting disclosures, everything is in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated, and we report our reserves and production before royalties. Also, I would suggest reviewing the advisory section in our financial statements that includes comments on non-GAAP disclosure. Speaking on today's call will be Scott Stauth, our President; and Victor Darel, our Chief Financial Officer. Additionally, in the room with us this morning are Robin Zabek, COO of E&P; and Jay Froc, COO of Oil Sands. Scott will begin by running through our strong operational performance that includes numerous production records in the quarter and our leading operating costs. Victor will then summarize our strong financial results and our significant return to shareholders so far this year. To close, Scott will summarize prior to opening the line for questions. With that, over to you, Scott.
Thank you, Lance, and good morning, everyone. Canadian Natural achieved record quarterly corporate production during the quarter, both in liquids and natural gas production. This is the second time this year where we have achieved quarterly production records on strong performance by our teams as we executed both organic growth and accretive acquisitions. Our production totaled approximately 1.62 million BOEs per day, which, as mentioned, includes records for both liquids and natural gas at approximately 1.18 million barrels per day and approximately 2.7 Bcf per day, respectively. The increase in production from Q3 2024 levels is very significant, totaling approximately 257,000 BOEs per day or up 19%. Our world-class oil sands mining and upgrading assets continue to achieve strong operational performance as Q3 2025 production averaged approximately 581,000 barrels of SCO with strong utilization of 104% and industry-leading operating costs of approximately $21 per barrel. On November 1, we closed the AOSP swap with Shell Canada Limited. Canadian Natural now owns and operates 100% of the Albian oil sands mines and associated reserves and retains a non-operated 80% working interest in the Scotford Upgrader and Quest facilities. This transaction adds approximately 31,000 barrels per day of annual zero-decline bitumen production to our portfolio, providing additional cash flow and driving long-term value creation for our shareholders. This swap also enhances our ability to integrate equipment and services across our mining operations, unlocking additional value through continuous improvement initiatives. Subsequent to the close of the swap transaction, we increased our 2025 corporate production guidance range to 1,560,000 BOEs per day to 1,580 million barrels per day, while our operating capital forecast remains unchanged at approximately $5.9 billion despite executing on additional activity on our larger asset base, reflecting acquisitions this year. I will now run through our third-quarter area operating results, starting with oil sands mining and upgrading. During the quarter, our world-class oil sands mining and upgrading production was strong, averaging 581,136 barrels per day of SCO, an increase of approximately 83,500 barrels per day or 17% from Q3 2024 levels, reflecting the additional interest in the AOSP acquired in December 2024, combined with our effective and efficient operations, which drove stronger utilization of approximately 104% in the quarter. Additionally, Canadian Natural's oil sands mining and upgrading operating costs continue to be industry-leading, averaging $21.29 per barrel of SCO in Q3 of 2025. In our thermal in situ operations, we achieved strong thermal production in the quarter, averaging 274,752 barrels per day in Q3, up slightly from Q3 2024 levels. Thermal in situ operating costs remained strong, averaging $10.35 per barrel in Q3, a decrease of 2% from the same quarter last year. We continue to progress our pad development plans across our thermal assets. At Primrose, we began drilling a CSS pad in Q3 of '25 with production targeted to come on in the second half of '26. At Jackfish, we brought a SAGD pad on production in July '25 as planned. At Kirby, we brought on a 5 well-pair SAGD on production in late October as planned. Lastly, at Pike, the company tied in the 2 recently drilled SAGD pads into the Jackfish facilities. These 2 SAGD pads are targeted to keep the Jackfish facilities at full capacity with the first pad targeted to come on production in January 2026 and the second pad in Q2 of '26. The commercial scale solvent SAGD pad in Kirby North shows current SOR reductions and solvent recoveries are meeting expectations following recent workovers and optimization. On the conventional side of the business, Canadian Natural's highly successful multilateral heavy crude oil drilling program continues to unlock opportunities on our approximately 3 million net acres of high-quality land throughout our primary heavy oil crude oil assets. Primary heavy crude oil production averaged 87,705 barrels during the quarter, an increase of 14% from Q3 2024 levels, reflecting strong drilling results on our multilateral wells. Operating costs in our primary heavy oil crude oil operations averaged $16.46 per barrel in Q3, a decrease of 12% from Q3 of 2024, primarily reflecting higher production volumes and the increasing proportion of lower operating costs for multilateral production. Pelican Lake production averaged approximately 42,100 barrels per day, a decrease of 7% from Q3 of '24, reflecting planned maintenance that took place in Q3 of '25 and the low nature of field declines from this long-life, low-decline asset, while operating costs at Pelican averaged $9 per barrel in the quarter. North American light crude oil and natural gas production averaged 180,100 barrels per day during the quarter, an increase of 69%, or approximately 74,000 barrels per day from Q3 of '24, primarily reflecting production volumes from the acquisition of the liquid-rich Duvernay assets in December of '24 and light crude oil from the Palliser Block assets in Q2 of this year as well as liquid-rich Montney assets in the Grande Prairie area during the third quarter. The operating cost of the company's North American light crude oil and NGLs operations averaged $12.91 per barrel, a decrease of 6% from Q3 '24, primarily reflecting higher production volumes. On the natural gas side, North American production averaged approximately 2.66 Bcf for the quarter, an increase of 30% from Q3 2024 levels, primarily reflecting the Duvernay and Montney acquisitions and strong drilling results in our liquids-rich natural gas assets. North American natural gas operating costs averaged $1.14 per Mcf in Q3, a decrease of 7% from Q3 of '24 levels of $1.23 per Mcf, reflecting higher production volumes and cost efficiencies. Our unique and diverse asset base provides us with a competitive advantage. We allocate capital to the highest return projects without being reliant on any one commodity. Our consistent and top-tier results are driven by safe and reliable operations. Our commitment to continuous improvement is supported by a strong team culture in all areas of our company that focus on improving our cost, driving execution of growth opportunities and increasing value to shareholders. Now I will turn it over to Victor for our third-quarter financial review.
Thanks, Scott, and good morning, everyone. In the third quarter of 2025, we achieved several production records as a result of strong operational performance and the accretive acquisition over the past year, contributing to the strong results this quarter. Our teams demonstrated excellent execution, evidenced through our strong operating cost performance. Our results, including strategic acquisitions completed in the last 12 months, supported strong quarterly adjusted funds flow of approximately $3.9 billion and adjusted net earnings of $1.8 billion. Returns to shareholders in the quarter were $1.5 billion, including $1.2 billion of dividends and $300 million of share repurchase. Dividend payments and share repurchases in 2025, up to and including November 5, bring total year-to-date shareholder returns to approximately $6.2 billion and contribute significant production growth per share in 2025, targeted at 16% compared to 2024, demonstrating very significant value creation this year. As a reminder, Canadian Natural has increased its dividend for 25 consecutive years with a CAGR of 21%, a truly impressive track record that is unique amongst our peer group. Subsequent to quarter-end, the Board has approved a quarterly dividend of $0.5875 per common share, payable on January 6, 2026, to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 12, 2025. Our balance sheet remains strong with quarter-end debt-to-EBITDA of 0.9x and debt to book capital coming in at 29.8%. Quarter-end liquidity was also strong at over $4.3 billion, reflecting undrawn revolving bank facilities and cash on hand at period end. Additionally, during Q3, the company repaid USD 600 million of U.S. dollar debt securities and received a new long-term investment-grade credit rating of BBB+ from Fitch Ratings. Our third-quarter results reflect the impact of accretive acquisitions, which have immediately contributed to incremental production and additional free cash flow generation. Our robust quarterly funds flow and strong balance sheet demonstrates our industry-leading cost structure, large reserve base of high-quality, long-life, low-decline assets and our commitment to continuous improvement and reliable execution. These factors, along with the company's track record of delivering strong shareholder returns, support significant long-term value creation for Canadian Natural and our shareholders. With that, I'll turn it back to you, Scott.
Thanks, Victor. In summary, here at Canadian Natural, our culture of continuous improvement and ownership alignment with shareholders drives our teams to create significant value across all areas of the company. Once again, we achieved record production levels, strong financial results through our effective and efficient operations, driving strong returns on capital and value creation for our shareholders. Lastly, just a reminder that we will be hosting our Open House tomorrow morning starting at 8:30 Eastern Standard Time, where we will go over our strategy, provide details on our assets and value creation opportunities. You're also invited to listen to the management presentation and view the presentation slides via webcast. You can look to our website for further details. With that, I'll turn it over for questions.
Your first question comes from Dennis Fong of CIBC World Markets.
The first one is related to your recent closing of the asset swap for the Albian mine. Now that you control 2 mining assets in very close proximity to each other, can you talk to some of the potential upside or opportunities that exist? I know you've already addressed consolidating inventory and lowering spare parts required in various storerooms. But can you talk towards maybe operational benefits beyond that, again, given the proximity of the 2 assets?
Yes. Thanks, Dennis. In addition to what you mentioned, there's also the utilization of equipment. So that would include the large haul trucks and the support equipment such as dozers, graders and other assets of that nature. But Dennis, I would suggest that it would be worthwhile to listen for more details tomorrow during our open house, and we can get into more detail in terms of the cost savings that we are working on and aiming to achieve there. So I think that's probably the best way to explain it is to be a part of our open house tomorrow.
Perfect. I'll have to wait and see, I guess, on that basis. I suspect the second question may have a similar answer. But I mean, given the continued development and the tie-in of the wells at Pike, I was just looking through and it seems like Grouse in close proximity to your Kirby assets has a similar opportunity there. Can you maybe outline some efficiencies that you could see developing proximal resources to your 2 other central processing facilities?
Yes. For sure, Dennis. I think you are correct in suggesting that it's probably going to be a similar answer. For sure, we'll walk you through tomorrow the assets that are adjacent to the Jackfish and Kirby assets. So we'll be able to give you a good rundown tomorrow of how we would look at development plans given the opportunities that are presented in those areas. So looking forward to that discussion tomorrow.
Your next question comes from Manav Gupta of UBS.
Congrats on a very strong quarter again. I wanted to ask you about an announcement yesterday from Energy Transfer that they are looking to FID the South Illinois Connector Pipeline, looking to get more Canadian crude into Illinois and to Gulf Coast. I just wanted to understand, would you be open to participating in any such project or any other major projects out there that give you more incremental egress capacity towards the Mid-Con or the Gulf Coast refiners where your crude is highly valued?
Yes. Thanks for the question. We certainly review those opportunities for egress when they are presented. There are a number of opportunities, whether it be Enbridge, TMX, or others, and we will certainly look at those to see if we would participate in volume commitments on those or otherwise. The good news is that the egress opportunities that companies have been talking about bode very well for strong differentials. Ultimately, that is the most important aspect, whether your barrels are locked up or sold in the Hardisty Edmonton area, it is a positive for Canadian crude. So looking forward to those opportunities as they come about, and we'll see where that goes.
Your next question comes from Doug Leggate of Wolfe Research.
This is Carlos actually on for Doug, who, by the way, is on his way to your Analyst Day. So he sends his apologies. Just to be real quick and respectful of my peers' time. Number one, I wonder what your perception is today of the need to further consolidate West Canada gas in the context of weak AECO pricing and despite the ramp in LNG, perhaps similar to how your U.S. peers have been doing in the recent past.
Yes, it's a good question. You don't have to apologize for Doug. It's good to see that he'll show up tomorrow. We're looking forward to those discussions. In terms of consolidation, certainly, we're seeing some of that evolve. I think the most important thing to the basin is maybe a certain degree of consolidation. However, the most important thing is egress opportunities. The more gas that we can move out of the basin, the better the LNG projects that are online now, LNG Canada and others that are coming on in the future are very much needed for the basin to fully unlock the potential. So in spite of whatever M&A activity may be going on in the basin, we look forward to more egress because ultimately, that's what the basin requires.
I appreciate that. Just a housekeeping item. It looks like your Palliser and Duvernay might have contributed to your sequential oil production growth. Just wondering if that is the case? If so, how does it set you up for your growth outlook into the first half of '26?
Yes. Certainly, both of those areas will be part of our budgeting activities for next year. We've got strong production growth in the Duvernay and having taken over the assets earlier this year in the Palliser Block, we continue the capital allocation towards light oil wells in that area, and it will be a part of our program for next year as well.
Your next question comes from Greg Pardy of RBC Capital Markets.
Scott, I'll apologize because I won't be here in person tomorrow, which is probably the first time in 20-something years. In any event, I'll have a go at you maybe ahead of tomorrow. What's your thinking now? We have had a new federal government in place for a little bit of time now. There's been a lot more dialogue with the industry. Just curious, any broad strokes on progress on things like pathways, how much easier is it perhaps to work with the federal government? Is this sort of a cautious approach? Just interested in any broad strokes there that you might have.
We'll miss you tomorrow there, Greg, but I appreciate your question. Certainly, we're seeing more positive signs than we've seen in the past under previous leadership. We like the discussions that are going on, Greg. However, there are lots of details to work through in terms of carbon competitiveness. That's going to be key to understand the impacts that may come out of that level of discussion. The details at this point are not well understood, and we are very anxious to work with both the federal government and the government of Alberta to ensure that we have a collaborative way to move forward to address the needs for pathways and certainly for future growth opportunities to unlock additional value out of the basin, whether it be oil sands or conventional, as more egress is needed for both gas and oil. The more that we can do to collectively work with the government to promote that growth, increase jobs in Canada, increase taxes and royalties, is very important for the industry and for Canada's GDP. It's critical to continue these discussions. We are encouraged by the engagement we have witnessed.
Okay, terrific. No, I think that's probably as much as you can say right now. There’s a lot more water that needs to flow into the bridge. Maybe I'll pivot just on a specific question from an investor, which was around the potential acceleration of the T-Block decommissioning. If we look at your financing cost in 3Q, significantly lower, I know some of that is due to PRT and so forth. The abandonment expenditures tend to be a fairly large number. I'm just trying to get, even though you may not want to talk too much about '26 CapEx and so forth, to get a sense from Victor of what the implications could be and to the extent you can quantify it, that would be super helpful.
Just in terms of the impact on the '26 capital budget, is that the question effectively, Greg?
Yes. Victor, like if I look at what, '25, I think it was like $756 million, a good chunk of that is North Sea and then there's PRT in there and you get cash recoveries. But I’m just trying to understand, should we be thinking about a bigger number than, say, $750 million next year if you decide to accelerate? Or would this all kind of come out in the wash?
The way I would look at it, Greg, is that 2025 coming into 2026, the expenditure levels do go up modestly in '26 overall. That would be the target. But we're working through that still and planning for our 2026 budget. Overall, when you look at the next 5-year period, you have to remember that the tax recoveries on that expenditure are weighted to the first 5 years. So the net increase after tax recovery is fairly modest. We will see about a 75% tax recovery on the next 5 years expenditure.
Your next question comes from Menno Hulshof of TD Cowen.
I'll just put a very short-term lens on things. For my first question, now that we're halfway through the fourth quarter, give or take, how would you describe the operational setup into the end of the year? Are there any assets that you would flag as having outperformed or underperformed quarter-to-date?
Yes, it's a good question. At this point in the quarter, all assets are performing as expected. Optimization utilization looks very strong and continues from what we've seen over the past couple of quarters here from that perspective of utilization. So nothing really to highlight there. All assets are performing as we would expect.
Terrific. You may or may not want to answer this one because it might cannibalize tomorrow a little bit. But could you remind us which assets are scheduled for turnaround in 2026? Presumably, Horizon is one of them, but what are the others? How large are these turnarounds expected to be?
Yes. Horizon would certainly be the most significant likely in the third quarter of next year. Outside of that, it would be our normal routine turnarounds that we see at each facility, typically about every 5 years. Our thermal facilities go in for a turnaround as well. Nothing too significant stands out. The only real difference from '25 to '26 would be Horizon.
Your next question comes from Alexa Petrick of Goldman Sachs.
Following the close of several accretive acquisitions, we were curious about your updated thoughts on M&A. Can you provide any broader commentary around your capital allocation strategy, balancing dividend growth with share repurchases and potential for further M&A?
Yes. Not a lot to comment on M&A activity. Certainly, you referenced some recent acquisitions that were opportunistic for us. As you may be aware, we do look at many M&A opportunities. We execute on very few, but we certainly examine the ones that seem the most accretive to our operations and generally in close proximity to our core areas. In terms of our allocation, no significant changes there. The allocation policy is straightforward. We do not plan to change that relative to M&A activity or not.
Okay. That's helpful. As a follow-up, if we could dig a little more into your macro outlook, how are you thinking about light heavy differentials from here, particularly with OPEC adding barrels into the market?
I think we expect to see the differentials stay in the range of $10 to $13 a barrel, and then it will fluctuate depending on refinery activities in the United States. I don't see any significant changes in the near term. As long as we have strong egress out of Western Canada, those differentials will remain in that range. Additionally, there's still some spot capacity on the TMX system, which is very supportive for pricing. There's strong demand out of Asia for Canadian heavy crude, which is also very supportive. Essentially, TMX has stabilized the entire Western market here. That's how I would summarize it for you.
There are no further questions at this time. I would hand over the call to Lance Casson for closing remarks. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator. Thanks, everyone, for joining our call this morning. We look forward to seeing you all tomorrow at our Investor Open House or on the webcast. If you have any questions, please do call.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect.