Good day, and welcome to the GCM Grosvenor Second Quarter 2021 Results Webcast. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Stacie Selinger, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, ma'am.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to GCM Grosvenor's Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. Today, I am joined by GCM Grosvenor's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michael Sacks; President, Jon Levin; and Chief Financial Officer, Pam Bentley. Before we discuss this quarter's results, a reminder that all statements made on this call that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements. This includes statements regarding our current expectations for the business and our financial performance. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results. Factors discussed in the Risk Factors section of our 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements on this call. We'll also refer to non-GAAP measures that we view as important in assessing the performance of our business. A reconciliation of non-GAAP metrics to the nearest GAAP metric can be found in our earnings presentation and earnings supplement, both of which are available on the Public Shareholders section of our website. Our goal is to continually improve how we communicate with our shareholders. In that spirit, we look forward to your feedback and we'll endeavor to continually improve in this regard. Thank you again for joining us. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Michael.

Thank you, Stacie, and thank you to all of you for participating. The second quarter marked 50 years of operations for GCM Grosvenor, a rarity in the alternative investment arena, and we are proud to celebrate that milestone. What is particularly nice is that we are as encouraged today by our ability to drive value for clients and shareholders as we have been at any time over the last 30 years that I have been at the firm. The second quarter of 2021 was another strong quarter for GCM Grosvenor with solid investment results and growth in assets, revenue, profitability and earnings power. The quarter's results left us solidly on track with regard to our 12% to 15% fee-related revenue and 15% to 20% fee-related earnings growth targets. We have often cited strong free cash flow generation and the ability to return capital to shareholders as attractive features of our business. In light of our results and future prospects, our Board has approved a dividend increase of 12.5% to $0.09 per share from $0.08 per share. That $0.09 per share dividend is payable on September 15 to shareholders of record on September 1. Our Board also authorized a $25 million stock repurchase plan, of which $6 million will be used to reduce the number of Class A shares being delivered in August that are associated with prior equity awards. Turning to Slide 4 of our earnings presentation. From the end of the second quarter of 2020, we have seen growth in assets under management, which increased 18% to $67 billion; in fee-paying assets under management, which increased 11% to $55 billion; and in contracted not yet fee-paying assets under management, which increased 26% to $7 billion. Our asset growth has been the product of solid fundraising, investment performance and the conversion of contracted not yet fee-paying assets under management. Our pipeline, including contracts in process, our co-mingled funds in market, our private market separate account re-ups and new separate account opportunities remains robust, and we are optimistic with regard to fundraising for the remainder of the year. As Jon will discuss further, we've invested in our business development efforts, including the establishment of GCM Broker Insurance Solutions, which we believe holds real promise for the firm. During the quarter, 72% of our $1.5 billion of funds raised came from existing clients and 28% came from new clients, a continuation of the expected return to a more normal picture following the initial COVID shock. Year-to-date, we've raised capital in all of our verticals with infrastructure seeing the largest increase among our private market strategies. Our fee-related earnings increased 9% over the second quarter of 2020 and 23% for the first half of 2021 as compared to the first half of 2020. Our second quarter FRE margin was 32%, and our year-to-date FRE margin of 31% compares favorably to the 28% margin we experienced in the first half of 2020. We continue to believe we have operating leverage with regard to FRE margin. For the quarter, our adjusted EBITDA increased 17% over the second quarter of 2020 and 34% for the first half of 2021 as compared to the first half of 2020. Our adjusted net income increased 30% over the second quarter of 2020 and 56% for the first half of 2021 as compared to the first half of 2020. Turning to Slide 5 of the presentation. The value of the firm's share of investments and unrealized carry at net asset value more than doubled to $349 million from $158 million a year ago. Those numbers are inclusive of the Mosaic assets, which were $290 million as of June 30, 2021. It is worth noting that the value of the Mosaic acquisition improved considerably from the March 31 values that were the best information available when we communicated via press release on June 23. As noted in that release, we were able to secure a discount to the original option price, which incentivized us to exercise the option early. The significant increase in the firm's share of carry at net asset value over the last year increases our earnings power considerably. Using an assumption of an average of 6.5 years to realize carry at net asset value, the forward-looking earnings power of the firm's share of carry translates into $38 million of estimated average annual revenue, which is considerably higher than trailing 12-month carry realizations and is more than double the earnings power of the firm's share of carry and net asset value a year ago. Combined with $42 million of run rate annual performance fees, this results in $80 million of run rate firm share of incentive fees before cash-based incentive fee bonuses. As of the end of the second quarter, we had collected approximately $9 million of performance fees so far this year. At June 30, we enjoyed $32 million of unrealized performance fees eligible to be realized in 2021, which are not reflected in our revenue. With positive absolute return strategies performance in the back half of the year, that number grows. For the second quarter of 2021, our absolute return strategies management fees were up 11% compared to the second quarter of 2020. For the year, our absolute return strategies fundraising has been more than $1.1 billion, approximately $540 million of which was in the second quarter. We had net absolute return strategy outflows for the second quarter of approximately $280 million, resulting in a modest net outflow of approximately $76 million for the year. Importantly, the fee rates on absolute return strategies funds raised have exceeded the fee rates on outflows, resulting in an increase in our absolute return strategies management fees for the second quarter despite the modest outflows and for the year. That is all before giving effect to the increase in absolute return strategies fee-paying assets under management associated with our investment results. While we continue to maintain our base case expectation of flat flows for our absolute return strategies vertical and we are unlikely to change that assumption without clear evidence of a significant change in the macro environment, we continue to believe in the strong value proposition the vertical provides and the value that our breadth of strategies provides to both clients and shareholders. There are few alternative solutions providers with the ability to serve clients at scale in both private markets and absolute return strategies. As we have said before, when we look at the way the other solutions providers with similar growth rates in private market strategies are valued, and we look at our own valuation and breadth of strategies, we think the value of our platform is underappreciated. During the quarter, we were added to the Russell 2000 and the S&P Total Markets indices. Also during the quarter, the CRSP Index, which had previously utilized an inaccurate free float share count corrected the share count, resulting in a share sale of approximately 10 million shares from one passive index shareholder upon rebalancing in June. In closing, we leave the quarter with great confidence in our ability to deliver value for clients and shareholders over the remainder of 2021, in 2022 and beyond. And with that, I'll turn the call over to GCM Grosvenor President, Jon Levin. Jon?

Thank you, Michael. I'll begin my remarks on Slide 6. Michael hit on the continued growth in the earnings power and scalability of the business, and we're excited to continue to invest behind this momentum. Importantly, while always investing for the future, we remain laser focused on delivering exceptional performance and client service to our existing clients. But we also believe there's a large world of potential clients that would benefit from our solutions. In that vein, last quarter, we mentioned our recently established office in Toronto. In recent weeks, you likely saw additional hires and initiatives we've announced in our business development area. One area in particular that I want to address is the creation of GCM Grosvenor Insurance Solutions. We believe our investment capabilities in combination with our flexibility and creativity in structuring and executing those strategies makes us an ideal partner for insurance companies. Historical under-allocation to alternatives, combined with the current interest rate environment, will drive growing interest in alternatives from insurance company balance sheets. The global insurance market is a multitrillion-dollar opportunity. Insurance capital represents less than 5% of our AUM today, and we believe this segment could become a low to mid-double digits percentage of our AUM over time, which makes it a multibillion-dollar opportunity for us. You should expect to continue to see us invest in our business development function. This past quarter, we raised $1.5 billion, bringing year-to-date fundraising to $4 billion. Our fundraising continues to be notable in its high level of diversification across asset class, investment type and client type. Based on our current fundraising pipeline, we're very optimistic for the back half of the year, which consistent with our plan, is likely to see asset raising that exceeds the first half of the year. We continue to benefit from a strong fundraising backdrop across private markets in particular, which accounted for two-thirds of our fundraising in the second quarter. As we expected, we saw specialized funds contribute more significantly to our fundraising this quarter with total fundraising split approximately evenly between specialized funds and customized separate accounts. Our existing clients continue to be a significant source of fundraising, and this quarter, 72% of capital raised was again from existing clients. Notably, since a year ago, we have doubled the number of wealth channels that have at least one GCM product approved on their platform. More than 95% of our top 25 clients have added capital in the past three years, a significant endorsement of our value proposition and the strength of our relationships. We have intentionally structured our business model to evolve and grow with our clients. Oftentimes, relationships move into new strategies. We currently work with more than 45% of our top clients across multiple investment verticals. We also see strong interest in ESG and impact investment strategies, which we view as both a differentiator and competitive advantage for the firm. With regards to investment activity, the second quarter remained quite active. In the quarter, we invested approximately $3.1 billion of capital across more than 100 investments, bringing year-to-date capital deployment to nearly $6.5 billion. We also reported solid return generation across all verticals. In absolute return strategies, the trailing 12-month net performance was 17% as of June 30. Within private market strategies, we saw a 27% increase in unrealized carry in the quarter, which speaks to the significant appreciation in our investments during that period. I will now touch on the significant growth in earnings power from incentive fees, which is best captured on Slide 7 and provides a little bit more detail to what Michael already discussed. As a reminder, we have incentive fees of two forms: annual performance fees, which are typically associated with our absolute return strategies vertical; and carried interest, typically associated with our private markets activities. The earnings power from the total incentive fee opportunity represents significant upside and is growing at a nice clip. The firm's unrealized carried interest and investments at net asset value as of the end of the quarter increased in value by more than 120% in the last year as investment performance has continued to be strong and now stands at $349 million in total value. Within that figure, the firm's unrealized carried interest and net asset value is $247 million as of quarter end, which has grown by more than 170% in the past year. To help you translate this into annual earnings power figures, if you assume that it takes on average 6.5 years to realize carry, that $247 million would translate into annual carry realizations of $38 million. This annual earnings power has more than doubled over the last year, in line with the increased value of our unrealized carry. This figure only represents carry associated with programs that have already appreciated in value, typically older programs and does not yet include the carry associated with billions of dollars of capital raised in more recent time periods. As a reminder, our carried interest pool is unique in its very high level of diversification, which alleviates potential volatility in carry earnings. Our unrealized carry is spread among 129 programs, each with typically dozens of contributing investments. Beyond carried interest, we have $42 million of run rate annual performance fees, a number that has grown by 45% over the past year as we continue to see a mix shift in fee structures within the absolute return strategies vertical. Taken together, while we continue to be a management fee-centric business, we believe this $80 million combined figure, which is before any discretionary incentive fee compensation, is an important contributor to value that we can deliver to shareholders over time.

Thanks, Jon. I'll begin on Slide 9. As our assets have continued to grow and we continue to see a mix shift towards higher fee activities such as co-investments, direct investments, and secondaries, we've seen an accelerating positive trend in our earnings power. The firm's adjusted revenue increased 33% compared to the second quarter of 2020 and 29% on a year-to-date basis. Our fee-related revenue this quarter increased by 13% over the second quarter of 2020. And on a year-to-date basis, our fee-related revenue was up 10%. Both absolute return strategies and private markets saw management fee growth from the first to second quarters and on a year-over-year basis. Consistent with our expectations, private market specialized funds more significantly contributed to management fee growth this quarter, increasing 11% over the first quarter and 24% on a year-to-date basis. Part of this was driven by catch-up management fees from our private markets specialized funds, which were $2.3 million in the second quarter. We anticipate similar levels of catch-up management fees in the third and fourth quarters. Our fee rates in each of our verticals were stable, and solid fundraising for specialized funds and for secondary, co-invest and direct investment activities provide support for our current fee levels and rate expansion opportunity going forward. Administration fees declined this quarter to just under $2 million upon the expiration of a long-term contract we had to provide ARS administrative services. Broadly speaking, we provide these services to primarily private market clients for over $0.25 trillion in assets. This is an ancillary service we offer to many of our clients, which has significant benefits in the form of client retention and data. You can expect our administration fees to level off to less than $1 million per quarter starting in the third quarter. Moving to incentive fees. We realized just under $3 million of annual performance fees this quarter. As we noted last quarter, we typically realize the majority of our annual performance fees in the fourth quarter, so the fees received in the second quarter were not surprising and in line with our expectations. In addition, we realized more than double the level of carried interest this quarter compared to Q1, and overall investment realizations continue to be strong. Turning to Slide 10. We are very pleased to see the investments we've made in recent years continue to come to fruition and drive growth in our assets under management and financial performance. As Michael noted, on a year-to-date basis, our fee-related earnings, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted net income all increased illustrating the continued positive momentum of our business. Our year-to-date fee-related earnings increased by 23% over the same period a year ago, reflecting the growth in our management fees, combined with the business scaling and margin expansion that we've discussed on prior calls. Our fee-related earnings margin grew quarter-over-quarter and was more than 31% for the first half of 2021 compared to 28% for the first half of 2020 despite the higher costs necessary to operate as a public company. We expect stable to modest increases in our fee-related earnings margin through the rest of the year. Headcount was relatively stable in the second quarter. We expect headcount to increase through the balance of the year as we continue to make strategic investments in certain business development professionals as well as public company-related personnel. Our fee-related earnings compensation and benefits decreased quarter-over-quarter to $40 million as we moved past some of the seasonally higher expenses in the first quarter. That said, you can expect stable to modest growth in FRE comp in the third and fourth quarters as we see the full impact of some of our headcount additions. Turning to incentive fee-related compensation. Since our Mosaic asset acquisition did not close until early July, our incentive fee compensation in the second quarter primarily relates to our realized ARS performance fees. Going forward, you can expect cash-based incentive fee compensation to be based off the net incentive fees attributable to the firm from both realized carried interest as well as performance fees. General and administrative expenses increased on a quarter-over-quarter and year-to-date basis due to public company operating costs; and secondarily, as travel activity has started to resume. We anticipate stable to modest increases in G&A over the balance of the year, dependent on potentially higher travel activity related to our business development efforts. Overall, our expenses are in line with our fee-related earnings expectations of 15% to 20% growth year-over-year. We also remain on track for fee-related revenue growth of 12% to 15% this year. Turning to Slide 12. The business continues to generate strong cash flow, and our cash balance at quarter end was $246 million net of cash designated to fund future investments. This includes the cash generated from our $110 million incremental term loan, which we completed in June to finance the Mosaic asset repurchase. As a result of increasing the size of our term loan, our quarterly interest expense is expected to be closer to $5 million per quarter starting in the third quarter of this year. We closed on the transaction to repurchase Mosaic on July 2, which was funded by $165 million of our cash. As Jon walked through, the transaction further enhances the value of our on- and off-balance sheet assets, mainly investments and unrealized carried interests. In addition to the economic value, we are pleased to eliminate the financial statement complexity associated with the Mosaic-related redeemable noncontrolling interest and hope that it is easier to see the value embedded in our balance sheet and future earnings. Finally, given our strong profitability and our confidence in our future growth, as Michael mentioned, we are increasing our dividend to $0.09 for the third quarter, and the Board authorized a share repurchase plan of up to $25 million. This $25 million plan will primarily be used to opportunistically repurchase outstanding Class A shares and warrants. An estimated $6 million of this plan will be used to reduce shares to be issued to employees to satisfy associated tax obligations in connection with the delivery of vested equity-based awards in August. In summary, we continue to be excited by the positive trend of the business and the significant earnings power we are creating. Thank you again for joining us, and we're now happy to take any questions.

Our first question will come from Ken Worthington with JPMorgan.

Can you level set us in terms of fundraising for the specialized funds that you have in market? I think you mentioned in your prepared remarks that the outlook for the firm was better for fundraising in the second half than it has been so far in the first half. And I don't remember if you mentioned this or not, but I thought it might have been driven by the specialized funds. So again, to level set us, how much has been closed so far in, I think, the four funds you were expected to have in market this year: infra, secondaries, advanced and multi-assets? That would be number one. Number two, how much has been raised in these four funds so far this year? And then help us with expectations for the second half of the year. And then lastly, you mentioned that catch-up fees, I think, were $2.3 million in 2Q, but expected to be about the same in 3Q and 4Q. And I guess my question is if the fundraising is expected to be better in the second half of the year and given that there's more time going by and you're further away from the inception date of those funds, why wouldn't catch-up fees, in fact, be bigger in the second half of the year than they were in the first?

Thanks, Ken. It's Michael, and thank you for the questions. First, I would say that we are overall very comfortable, very confident as you heard me say, and as Jon said, in our fundraising for the second half of the year. We have not released numbers on specific fund raise, the specific co-mingled fund efforts, and we've stated that we won't do that until final close. And the only fund that's in market now that has a final close before the end of the year or at the end of the year is the advanced fund. So we look forward to releasing those numbers after the end of the year. What I can tell you is that we are confident in the performance of those co-mingled funds. We are confident in our separate account re-ups and our new separate account activity. And I think Jon said and our expectation is for fundraising larger in the back half of the year than in the front half of the year. And what I would mention on the catch-up management fees is that of the four funds in market, the only funds that have appreciable catch-up management fees are the secondaries fund and advanced multi-asset class having just getting started and with a lot of confidence on our part. And the infrastructure fund is structured in a way that there aren't catch-up management fees. So obviously, we have tried pretty consistently to be conservative in what we put out there for you. We have been very clear and very strong about our ability to hit our 12% to 15% fee-related revenue growth and our 15% to 20% fee-related earnings growth, and those numbers imply continued growth in the back half of the year. We've talked about the strength of the pipeline pretty directly. And Jon, I think, said pretty clearly what our expectations are for fundraising back half, and we're feeling very good about that environment in general.

Okay. So if we don't get specific numbers, can you give us maybe a sense how far of the way through infrastructure and secondaries are you? Are we in the first half of the game? Are we in the second half? I assume advanced is very much towards the end. But can you give us what inning we are? If you can't do it individually, then do it collectively?

Advanced is expected to have its final closing towards the end of this year, indicating that we are in the later stages. Both secondaries and infrastructure are projected to extend into next year, which puts us in the middle to late stages. As for MAC, it is still in the very early stages and shows significant promise. We feel comfortable with the pace of our fundraising and are confident in the figures we have shared, especially after reporting a couple of strong quarters. We remain optimistic about the latter half of the year.

Okay, great. In terms of the absolute return business, we experienced inflows in the first quarter and outflows in the second quarter. I would say the performance in the first quarter wasn't as strong, while the second quarter appeared satisfactory but fell short compared to what we see in Blackstone's business and some indices we track. Does performance need to improve to achieve more consistent inflows for the absolute return business? Michael, you mentioned that you consider flows in light of the macro environment, which is significant. But how crucial is it to deliver returns to restore more consistent inflows?

I would like to highlight a few points. First, performance is certainly important, but it's crucial to be cautious about adjusting expectations based on quarter-to-quarter results. Last year, we excelled compared to most of our competitors, and our performance over the last 12 months has been strong. Additionally, the flow environment this year appears favorable within the industry. While performance should always be a priority, it is essential to evaluate it over a reasonable time frame, especially since we have been in this business for many decades. Secondly, I want to emphasize the strengthening of our business's basic economics. Despite experiencing net outflows, the revenue impact from those flows was flat to slightly positive for the quarter and positive for the year, excluding the benefits from market compounding. This is solely based on management fees, and we also have substantial capital that is now subject to performance fees. We've seen a notable increase in our performance fee run rate over the past year. While we don't aim to forecast changes in the overall flow environment, we believe this vertical remains valuable and differentiates us positively with clients. It provides us with additional tools to offer solutions and support for our clients, has generated significant cash flow over the years, and will continue to do so. Moreover, when considering the relative valuation of our firm, we believe that our private markets business is growing similarly to others but is not being fully appreciated in the market.

This is Jon. I would just add one comment. Michael said this, but just to reiterate it, I think that from a performance standpoint across the board, where you kind of think about we have, generally speaking, clients that would work with us in ARS vertical either in a multi-strategy way, in a maybe more credit-oriented way or in an opportunistic way, those are kind of three big buckets across the board. The feedback from the marketplace and from clients is that when you look at our performance over longer periods of time, as Michael pointed out, I think, is a more important metric whether you're talking about the last 12 months, over the last 18 months, kind of almost universally, feedback on our performance is that it is strong, meeting their goals and generally strong from a competitive standpoint as well.

Our next question comes from Jeff Schmitt with William Blair.

Could you discuss the creation of the Insurance Solutions division and kind of your strategy there? We've seen some insurers pull back on alternative investments, I think, in recent years just trying to reduce volatility. But are you seeing that demand really shift there, I guess, with this low interest rate environment?

Jon, could you take that question? You mentioned it in your previous remarks, and I believe you can address it effectively.

Sure. I think, in general, our view is that the demand for alternatives is large and growing. Certainly, you will find specific instances where people have to be wary of the overall composition of their balance sheet and regulatory capital treatment. But to the point you made, overall, as a matter, it's in a place where there's historical under-allocation to alternative strategies. And then specific to the point you made, the interest rate environment only drives the need to find return from other areas besides fixed income, which make up obviously a significant portion of insurance company balance sheets. I think specific to us, the idea that we are an open architecture firm with a lot of different ways to implement alternative investing, primary funds, co-investments, secondary investments, direct investments, covering all of the asset classes from the liquid to the illiquid and the ability to work with clients in a customized manner, which as we know represents about 75% of our assets under management, makes us a pretty ideal partner. And particularly on that last piece, we have the ability to structure alternative solutions that meet insurance company balance sheet needs with respect to volatility, with respect to liquidity, with respect to return generation. And we think there's a very large opportunity there. And from a competitive standpoint, our focus is on providing those solutions to the insurance companies and asset management business as opposed to being in the insurance business ourselves, which is obviously a trend you've seen from others in the marketplace. And so we're pretty excited about what that future holds for us.

Right. Okay. And then looking at the carried interest, and you provided some great detail there on that kind of earnings power and how that's increasing. And then your retention of that has been going up in terms of how much is going to employees or what have you, your retention in that is going up. And I think maybe slow 60% goes out the door to employees now. And you had mentioned newer funds, your retention goes up. So do you see that going to kind of 50% over time to bring you more in line with peers? And how should we think about that time line? Like how long would that take?

The timeline is somewhat challenging to pinpoint. The cash received from carry now relates to allocations made over a range of years, some dating back as far as a decade. Currently, the distribution is approximately 65% to the firm and 35% to others, though it may skew slightly more towards the firm. This distribution stems from long-ago allocations. In recent years, we've been allocating carry to the team in a way that vests over time, with about half of it doing so. As we look ahead, the carry plans that are generating revenue will increasingly reflect the allocations made in the last 5 to 6 years, leading to a shift and growth in that number. Importantly, we anticipate an acceleration in these carry revenues over the next few years. Additionally, as Jon mentioned in his remarks, there is a significant amount of carry not yet at net asset value that relates to assets raised and funds invested in recent years, which we hope will start contributing moving forward. We believe these two strong tailwinds will effectively accelerate the firm’s share of carry as we advance.

Our next question comes from Peter Kaloostian with Morgan Stanley.

You mentioned strategic hires in the client group to expand to high-growth geographies and channels. I'm just kind of hoping to get a little bit more color on how you're approaching distribution today, specifically in high net worth channels where we're seeing increasing demand for alternatives.

Thank you, Peter, for your question. Jon mentioned this earlier. We believe that our best opportunity in high net worth over the intermediate term lies in enhancing our presence in the successful wealth channels. Over the past year, we have doubled the number of channels where our products are available. We are eager to continue expanding both the number of channels and the variety of products offered through these channels. We see considerable potential in this area. Long-time followers will recall that we have identified this as an opportunity for improvement, and we are beginning to see positive results from our efforts.

We'll take a follow-up question from Ken Worthington with JPMorgan.

In terms of capital management, how aggressive do you plan to be in deploying the $25 million or the $25 million less the $6 million? And then how do you approach warrants versus the common? And I think you said you plan on being opportunistic. But given where the stock price is, again, how attractive do you think the shares are here?

We find the current situation very appealing. As you know, Ken, we believe this is an attractive opportunity. The Board has authorized it, and we have a clear plan for utilizing a large portion of it. We are considering both warrants and stock, and we'll take a flexible approach. We plan to proceed thoughtfully, especially given the amount of capital involved, and we do prefer not to reduce the float. However, we have consistently emphasized the quality of our business as a basis for returning capital to shareholders. There are two primary methods for this: dividends and buybacks. We wanted to have a plan in place ready to go in case the stock continues to show weakness. This prepares us for any opportunities that may arise.

Okay. And then warrants versus common?

I believe we will consider accretion and dilution. It's present, but it's somewhat challenging for us to determine how much the warrant overhang is affecting shareholders or institutional investors. However, we will also take a look at the warrants.

Okay. The contracted but not yet fee-paying assets under management decreased slightly from high levels in the first quarter and remains relatively high. Is the mix of net sales changing again? Are we observing more net sales being funded immediately? I believe the pipeline had been growing because net sales were coming in differently compared to the past. There seems to have been more emphasis on pipeline development rather than immediate funding. Are you noticing the mix shifting back to how net sales appeared in previous years?

No, I don't think there are any significant changes in the business from the first quarter. We anticipate that number to increase in the latter half of the year and to be higher at year-end compared to today or the end of June. As you know, signing separate account agreements doesn’t always align perfectly with the calendar quarter. Last year, we had a similar fundraising level in the third quarter, and we experienced substantial growth in CNYFPAUM in the second quarter and again in the first quarter of this year. Therefore, we don’t see any fundamental shifts. We consistently aim to grow our FPAUM and CNYFPAUM, and we expect to achieve that in the latter half of the year.

And it appears there are no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the conference back to Stacie Selinger for any additional or closing remarks.

Thanks, Lauren. Thank you all for joining us today. If you have any feedback or follow-up questions, please feel free to reach out. Otherwise, we look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. Thank you again.

And that does conclude today's conference. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.