Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the RB Global 4th Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, press star 1 again. I will now hand the call over to Samir Rathod, Vice President, Investor Relations and Market Intelligence. Please go ahead.

Hello and good afternoon. Thank you for joining us today to discuss our full year and fourth quarter 2025 results. On the call with me today are Jim Kessler, our Chief Executive Officer, and Eric Garen, our Chief Financial Officer. The following discussion will include forward-looking statements, including projections of future earnings business and market trends these statements should be considered in conjunction with the cautionary statements contained in our earnings release and periodic sec reports on this call we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures for the identification of these measures the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and the applicable reconciliation please see our earnings release and sec filings At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to our CEO, Jim Kessler.

Thanks, Samir, and good afternoon to everyone joining the call. 2025 was a year of discipline, execution, and deliberate strategic progress at RV Global. Across the organization, our teams advance initiatives that are designed to strengthen our competitive standing, expand our partner relationships, and position the company for durable long-term growth and shareholder value creation. That discipline was evident again in the fourth quarter. Adjusted EBITDA increased 10% on a 4% increase in gross transaction value, reflecting continued operating leverage, strong execution, and tight cost management, even as we made intentional choices to support future growth. Before diving into the details, I want to clearly frame how we are approaching growth and profitability. Over the past year, we have been highly disciplined and selective in the contract we've signed and deals we've executed. We are prioritizing scale, longevity, and strategic positioning, with a clear focus on expanding market share, Increasing partner stickiness, enhancing lifetime value. Turning to the automotive sector, we delivered another solid quarter with unit volumes increasing 8% year over year, excluding the impact of CAT volumes in 2024. This marks the fourth consecutive quarter in which we have outpaced the market. I am proud that our team continued to deliver at a very high level and exceeded all of our service-level commitments in the fourth quarter, even as volumes grew meaningfully, underscoring the operational strength of our platform. Within the last 12 months, we've had several wins for our business. As part of these successes, we have signed a new multiyear agreement with one of our two largest partners while reaching an agreement in principle with the other. These agreements help to provide long-term visibility into expected volumes and deepen our strategic alignment with those customers and the industry. These renewals reinforce the trust of our partners' place in RV Global and reflect the exceptional service quality and execution we consistently deliver on at scale. Gross returns, or salvage values as the percentage of pre-accident cash values, continue to expand, supporting approximately 7% year-over-year growth in the U.S. insurance average selling price. This reflects ongoing improvements on the buying experience. During the quarter, we introduced new features that indicate when an item is guaranteed a sell, which we believe will increase buyer confidence and drive stronger pricing. We also enhanced our website to deliver more localized content and support, making it easier for customers worldwide to bid and buy seamlessly. Looking ahead to the next few years, we are energized by the strength of the request for proposals pipeline, with a significant portion expected to come from prospective partners, with whom we currently have no business. Even modest penetration into these partners could represent meaningful incremental market share opportunities for RV Global. Many of these organizations will be joining us again at our upcoming Industry Leadership Summit in Florida, providing a valuable form to deepen engagement and showcase the differentiated value of our platform. We are expecting a record number of attendees this year, and we believe their participation reflects the trust our insurance partners' place in RV Global to enhance their profitability. The more effectively we communicate and demonstrate our value proposition upstream of the transaction, the better positioned we should be to capture additional market share. In automotive, this means enabling our partners to optimize the vehicle towing to the most appropriate destination, whether that is one of our yards or a repair facility. Across the industry, billions of dollars are lost annually due to inefficient vehicle routing after an accident. In 2026, we plan to provide another innovative tool to help address this gap with the upstream rollout of IAEA Total Loss Predictor, designed to enable dynamic vehicle routing and is expected to deliver meaningful cost savings and operational efficiencies for our partners. While this initiative will take time to scale, we view it as a foundational capability that will strengthen partner economics and increase our long-term stickiness. Turning to the commercial construction and transportation sector, our growth strategy continue to deliver with GTB increasing 10% year-over-year, excluding the impact of yellow corporation bankruptcy. We remain cautiously optimistic as seller confidence shows early signs of improvement, supported by stabilizing use equipment values, lower interest rates, and continued strength in mega-projects and civil infrastructure. Our strategic initiatives are laying the foundation for sustained long-term growth. A key element of the strategy is to seek to offer solutions for every customer's disposition need. In response to growing customer demand, we are expanding our international channels by launching a new reserved auction format on rbauction.com. Reserved auctions are designed to provide sellers greater control over price realization by guaranteeing minimum value thresholds by maintaining flexibility to optimize liquidity. This format helps to enable sellers to manage time to liquidity, and if liquidity is wanted sooner, assets can be transitioned into our unreserved channel. As we look toward 2026, we are also focused on continuing to improve our territory manager productivity. We've recently launched AI-enabled role-playing, Essentially, a flight simulator for customer conversations. Territory managers, whether new or tenured, can now practice value messaging and channel and product knowledge with an AI consigner, receive immediate scoring and coaching, and track team-level progress. This capability is expected to provide a scalable, cost-efficient way to standardize best practices, accelerate new hire ramp, and enhance conversation. I will now pass the call to Eric to review the financials and provide our 2026 outlook.

Thanks, Jim. Total GTV increased by 4% in the fourth quarter. Automotive GTV increased 3% in the quarter, driven by a 2% rise in unit volumes, excluding the impact of catastrophic activity in the fourth quarter of 2024, GTV and unit volumes grew to approximately 12 and 8 percent respectively. Unit volume growth reflected continued new wins in the sector, as well as organic growth from existing partners. Throughout 2025, the inflation differential between automotive repair costs and used vehicle pricing continued to narrow, though it remained positive in the fourth quarter. This dynamic continues to support an increase in the total loss ratio, with CCC Intelligent Solutions estimating the total loss frequency across all categories increased by 10 basis points to 24.2% compared to the prior year period. It is important to note that the last year's ratio was elevated due to various catastrophic events, making the year-over-year comparison more challenging. The average price per vehicle sold increased approximately one percent in the quarter, or roughly four percent, excluding catastrophic impacts. Given by continued strength in U.S. insurance vehicles, partially offset by a higher mix of remarketed vehicles compared to the prior year period. GTV in the commercial construction and transportation sector increased 9%. Excluding the impact of yellow corporation bankruptcy, GTV and unit volumes grew approximately 10% and 9% respectively. The average price per lot sold increased primarily due to improvements in the asset mix. The favorable mix reflects a decline in lot volumes from the rental and transportation sectors, where assets typically carry lower average selling For the full year, total GTV increased 2%, driven by new wins in our automotive sector, partially offset by cyclical pressure in our CC&T sector. Moving to service revenue. Service revenue increased 5% in the quarter, driven by a higher GTV and a modest increase in service revenue take rate. The service revenue take rate increased by approximately 10 basis points year-over-year to 21.4%, primarily due to a higher average buyer fee rate. For the full year, service revenue increased 4%, reflecting similar dynamics. Adjusted EBITDA increased 10% in the quarter. Growth was driven by a higher GTV and take rate expansion partially offset by a lower inventory return. Our team remains focused on managing our cost structure to maximize profit flow through. This discipline, combined with our continued emphasis on operating efficiency, grows solid improvements in the quarter. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of GTV expanded to 8.9%, up from 8.4% in the prior year. Full-year adjusted EBITDA increased 7% on GTV growth, expansion in the service revenue take rate, and higher inventory returns. Adjusted earnings per share in the fourth quarter and full year increased by 17% and 15% respectively, driven by a higher operating income, a lower net interest expense, and a lower adjusted tax rate. Our adjusted and gap tax rates came in below prior guidance due to additional discrete tax deductions captured in our 2024 U.S. federal tax return. Moving to our outlook for 2026, we expect full-year gross transaction value to grow between 5% and 8% as we expect to continue to gain market share in 2026 across our sectors. We expect full-year adjusted EBITDA between $1.47 billion and $1.53 billion, representing approximately 7% growth at the midpoint. Consistent with our strategy, we remain focused on growing service revenue and view 2026 as a year of expected volume-led growth. We will continue to execute the Operational Excellence Program with the goal of efficiently translating incremental volume into EBITDA growth. As such, we remain focused on what is in our control, advancing cost savings initiatives, deploying technology that improves yard level efficiency, and executing against our operating model to drive productivity and operating leverage. Moving to CapEx, we currently expect full-year capital expenditures, which includes PP&E net of proceeds and additions to intangible assets to be between $350 and $400 million. We also expect our full year 2026 gap and adjusted tax rate to be between 23 and 25%. With that, let's open the call for questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. We ask that you please keep your questions limited to one preliminary question and one follow-up question. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, press star one again. Please pick up your handset when asking a question. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Sabahat Khan with RBC Capital markets. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thanks, and good afternoon. Just the first question on the 2026 guidance and the commentary that you shared around market share capture. Can we just maybe elaborate on are those just the annualization, are those those comments around the annualization of wins you've already announced on the IA side? Is that expected gains that maybe you haven't announced publicly?

Maybe you can just shed some light on sort of the market share commentary reflected in your 26 outlook thank you yeah thanks thanks for the question as Jim had mentioned in his prepared remarks we've signed with one of our large carriers and have reached agreement in principle so that is including all of the information that we have in front of us today is included in in my guidance so that would include yes run rate year-over-year and any additional terms that we've had agreement to.

Great. And then just, I guess, on the sort of the flow through of the GTV to revenue, you can maybe just talk through, I know the GSA went from last year, had a different take rate structure, but maybe you can just help us think through how we should think about this 5% to 8% GTV flow through to revenue and sort of are you able to just comment directionally on how that could shake up for the rest of the year in El Paso IBEX?

Yeah, I think what we're going to see is a little bit of pressure on the take rate, but we're really happy with the unit economics that we described with the GSA contract. I think Australia, we're really happy how that's progressing, but that profile is a little bit different. So, as I said, my prepared remarks, we're really focused on making sure that the unit economics fit into our model and driving volume. So we may see a little bit of pressure on the take rate percentage. But again, from a unit perspective, we are very pleased with the direction we're going in 2026. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Gary Prestopino with Barrington. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. Hey, Jim, a couple of questions here. In the CCT sector, you said you're seeing early signs of improvement. Could you maybe give us some idea, a little more granularity on that comment?

Yeah, look, I'll just start with this is still hard to decipher. We're in such a unique environment with tariffs and interest rates and everything that has been going on externally. But we are starting to see our partners talk in a different manner than they have in the past, which gets us excited about what it could mean in the future. But we're still in early stages to really know, are we getting back to a normalized cycle that we haven't had since five years ago? but we're starting to hear different conversations than what we had over the last two years and you can kind of see in the third and fourth quarter some momentum going in our favor.

Okay thank you and then second question was on the salvage side you talked about you're rolling out a new product or service a total loss predictor could you maybe elaborate a little bit on that?

Yeah the The one thing that we've been working with our partners and we call it the ultimate, you know, way to get efficient is if you think about a car gets in an accident and at the scene of accident, the ability to be able to get that car to either a repair facility or a salvage yard and using our predictor, which is in the high 90s of being able to do it with a four corner picture of a car. If you do that, you cut out of a lot of expense, storage, rental car fees, everything else that goes along with it. So that's where our partners are focused, and we're using AI to really help us innovate in this area. And at this point, we've tested the predictor multiple times and multiple different partners, and we feel really confident that we have a product that we can use to really add value to our partners. so at the point of an accident your predictor can say okay this car's told yeah the great thing is look you got it at the point of an accident we can do it also if it goes to a collision center by mistake and we could do it at the collision center and they don't have to do a tear down right which adds takes away value for the car we can do it there we can do it at a storage yard so the great thing is it's constantly can be used in multiple different areas but the place where

you get the most value is that scene of accident okay thank you very much your next question comes from Krista Friesen of CIBC your line is now open please go ahead hi thanks for taking my question and congrats on the quarter um maybe just to follow up on the last question as an example so you've you've developed this AI internally are you seeing maybe your your customers the insurance companies develop this sort of AI as well or even just new entrants into the business and I guess kind of more broadly I'm just trying to get out what you're seeing in terms of AI from competitors and or clients. Thank you.

Yeah look I think the one thing when you think about the range of insurance carriers from you know the number one in terms of you know how many people they have underinsured to a smaller insurance carrier. Everyone has a different capability of where they invest capital and where they have a need, right? So you might have some of the biggest insurance carriers that want to build their own tech. And what we would do is plug into that, right? They need to know to be able to do the calculation, what is the auction value? And we can easily plug in through APIs to their technology and think about medium-sized to smaller carriers that are looking for an end-to-end solution. We can provide that whole solution for them so i think there's going to be a different range of how people um you know partner i can see us with a lot of different third parties and towers right that necessarily might not be you know under our control that could be a third party that an insurance carrier uses where we plug into their apis and so what we're really focused on is we know there is a big effort um for our partners to be able to reduce advanced charges and how do we play a role in that in some cases that could be our technology in other cases we're plugging in an api and providing a piece of the puzzle that they need to be able to make that correct decision so we're open to all the above and what we're

really trying to do is listen to our partners and what are their needs and how do we plug in and add value and when we can thanks that's really great color and then maybe just my follow-up uh just on the capex guide um are you able to give us maybe a little bit more of a breakdown as to maybe what how much is going into these investments on the kind of instillary services versus your other calls on capital? Thank you.

Yeah, I think the breakdown I can share is what we've typically spent, and I think this is about the mix for 26, is about, you know, a third on technology related and two-thirds related to traditional PP&E, whether that be land or other types of physical assets that we'd be acquiring. So it's a two-thirds, one-third mix on capital.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Your next question comes from Stephen Hansen with Raymond James. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Yeah, thanks for time, guys. Appreciate it. Just a point of clarification first, the new multi-year contract you described in the MOU, just to clarify those are renewals and not incremental volume from existing customers, or do you anticipate growing scope with those contract renewals?

Yeah, let me start, and Eric, feel free to jump in. So, they are renewals, and look, I'm not going to get into specific contracts, but I'm just going to reiterate what Eric said in the beginning. And our expectation is that we're going to be able to continue to gain share in that, which means our expectation is that we're going to get incremental cars as we proceed. Going through it, Eric, do you have any?

No, I think that's where we are. Our expectation is we will gain an incremental share related to the volume and contracts that we're working through.

Yep, and Stephen, just to make sure we're clear, you know, we think we're well-positioned to grow faster than the market in 26 is probably the easiest way of saying it. Okay, that's fair. That's actually quite helpful.

Just want to circle back as a follow-up here on the cost to serve and the services gross margin, quite an improvement in the period. Do you want to maybe just give us a sense for what's driving some of that and how you feel like your cost structure has evolved here recently? I know you took a ton of costs out through the back half of last year, but just kind of get a sense for how we'd expect that going forward.

Yeah, I think what I would point to is Jim and I have been really focused and clear on our expectation is that the business is going to continue to create operating leverage, and that is where we continue to focus. So whether that be in the ops model that we described earlier in 2025, whether that be in how do we become more efficient in our yards. We'll just continue where we can improve on SG&A and how do we ramp our sales reps faster or our territory managers faster, as Jim described in his prepared remarks. We capture GTV sooner. So we just continue to look for opportunities to optimize across the full P&L, and that is just our ongoing operations. It's not a project. It doesn't have an end. It's really evergreen, and that's just how we approach the business.

And I think just to make sure for the group that we're being very clear of something that we're never going to stop as long as this management team is in place, we are going to be looking for ways to consistently grow our top line. We are going to be looking at how do we drive incremental margins to our business, And how do we do it in the most efficient way when you think about SG&A and expenses and how we manage that? Like, that process is never going to stop, right? So we're constantly going to strive to over-deliver on what I just mentioned. And then, of course, as we think about capital, we want to make sure we get the highest return we can if we're spending capital on anything. And I think the great thing is over the last two years, for Eric and I and the leadership team, we've built this culture. And now it's starting to get ingrained in everything we do. But I just want to make sure these aren't one-time things, right? These are things of focus, of philosophy, and a culture that we've built that's starting to really get ingrained inside the organization. Appreciate the call.

Your next question comes from Michael Feniger with Bank of America. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Thanks, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. You know, you guys generated nearly a billion of cash from Ops this year. You touched on the CapEx side of how you're thinking in 2026. I'm just curious, Eric, if there's anything we should be aware of in terms of the conversion rate for cash flow from EBITDA this year. And I know you talked about, you know, in terms of how you're thinking about allocating capital for the best returns. I'm just kind of curious how you guys are thinking about with the volatility in the shares at times, you know, if there's a share repurchase program or maybe a more formal program around that, given some of the volatility there, and that you guys have this favorable outlook in the next few years of share gains and a good backdrop?

Yeah, thanks for the question. As you know, we ongoing look at our capital allocation strategy. We'll continue to look at opportunities from paying down our debt, which we've continued to do. I think we ended the quarter at 1.4 times net debt to adjusted EBITDA, invest in the business as you described on capital, look at tuck in acquisitions and opportunities there like we've done with the Smith Broughton that we just closed and some of the JM Wood that we did earlier. So we'll continue to do that and focus on dividends as well. We also look at, as you're alluding to, you know, what's the right time to have an authorization in place, and we review that with the board on a quarterly basis. And at the appropriate time, when that makes sense, you know, we'll continue to evaluate that. And if it does make sense, we would put that in place to deploy that capital in the way.

Thank you. And, Jim, I'm kind of curious, when you think of autonomous vehicles, this is becoming more and more in the conversation. Just how do you guys think big picture about autonomous vehicles when you think of, you know, the dynamics of the market, salvage, your own competitive moat, and some of your physical assets? I'm just kind of curious if you can touch on that, as it seems like every couple of quarters we hear more about autonomous vehicles being part of the auto market.

Yeah, no, no. It's a great question. And, look, I just want to start to remind everyone with my background. So, you know, I've been either in rideshare, collision, salvage. So I have been probably for over 10 years dealing with this similar question in different markets. So, you know, look, we don't see any near-term risk. Long-term safety features such as ADAS, autonomous vehicles, you know, look, it could reduce collision rates and vehicle ownership. but it's too early to speculate on, you know, first and second order impacts. What's certain today is there are over 600 million vehicles on the road in between North America and Europe, and I look at it, we are well positioned to remain a critical player in a salvage vehicle market when I think about this. So that's really how I look at it, and look, I've been, you know, this question has been coming up for over 10 years, And, you know, I think we just faded our position.

Great. And just lastly, just to squeeze one more in. I mean, you guys reported 4% GTV growth and 10% EBITDA growth. So we all saw the flow through there. And just to understand the puts and takes, I know you guys walked through this. You know, you guys are investing for growth. You know, in a normal environment, is a 50% to 60% flow through the right sense on an auction basis? Is 26 maybe a bigger increase in investment for you guys for the long term, or is that just going to kind of be a continual thing in 26, 27, just kind of trying to get a sense of the investment and how we should think about the flow through there? Thanks, everyone.

Yeah, so let me just start with philosophy first, right, and I'll let Eric speak to numbers. So, you know, he'll handle that part. But look, whatever our flow through is, the one commitment I have as a management team, we're never going to stop. How do we improve it? Like nothing's ever going to be good enough. And I'm never going to put a limit on what it could be, right? Obviously, there's one number that's the highest number it could ever be, right, which is 100. But look, the way I look at this, our job as a management team is how do we constantly improve that and continue to grow it? And look, as the world evolves, it's constantly going to evolve what strategy we use of how do we do it. But for me and my team, our philosophy is it's never good enough, right? We're constantly looking for ways, and I'll let Eric speak to actual numbers at this point.

Yeah, I think the way I would look at it is, as Jim described, look, we're going to continue to look to optimize the P&L, but we're also going to make sure that we are looking at it long term. So there are opportunities as we go into 26 that we will make some investments in the business, and then the flow through will be a little bit later in the year. I would give you an example of Australia, like we said, in 25, right? We do the investment a little ahead of time, and then you start to see the flow through. So I would say longer term, I'm fully aligned, obviously, with Jim, that we will optimize the P&L, but we will not do things that are short-sighted that will impact our customer experience or not enable us to grow. So I think that's what you're seeing a little bit in 26 as we're doing some of these investments, and we'll continue to focus on driving top-line growth and making the P&L as efficient as possible. Thank you. You're welcome.

Your next question comes from the line of Maxim Sitchev with NBCM. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi, the next one, gentlemen. Jim I was wondering if you don't mind me just commenting a little bit more around the repair versus scrap maybe not the debate but any puts and takes there especially as used cars installation appears to slow down maybe any commenter that would be super helpful thanks look Mac you just want to clarify look I'm not going to speak to the to the collision space and repairable space I think that's up to someone else to do but just just give me a little bit more on color that you would want on our space specifically I'm happy to give it no just in terms of sort of the local trends I mean we discussed this in the past around you know the weight of vehicles etc so it doesn't seem there's to be any incremental changes from from that perspective right no no

no I'll pass that to Samir yeah hey Max great question I think if you look at the the recent data as Eric noted in his prepared remarks that spread between cost of repair inflation versus used car vehicles was narrowing throughout 2025 but I think if I look at the most recent data that started to go the other way which we see favorable for the total loss ratio to expand I think in terms of longer term drivers of you know salvage I think we've discussed you know average vehicle is getting heavier there's dynamics around that amongst other things that could you know continue to drive that loss ratio higher so I would say no changes structurally if anything

incrementally looking a little better okay great thank you and then just in terms of the reserved option channel for international buyers and end sellers Jim do you mind maybe commenting in terms of how big of an opportunity that could be down the line?

Yeah, look, when we look at certain countries, you know, one of the disadvantages on the Ritchie side that we have, and I'll take Germany and the Nordics specifically, they typically operate in a reserve model. And, you know, we're typically an unreserved model, so it limits our ability to go out and get market share. So what I'm really happy with, we're really giving the tools to our territory managers now to go out and really press to get market share. But it's a country-by-country thing of culture and what they're used to and how they go to market. But, look, some of the biggest countries in Europe, in the Nordics and Germany, you know, typically operate in this reserve model. And, look, as we, you know, go into different cultures and countries, you know, it's easier for a consigner and a seller to get used to a reserve model with a little bit of a backstop and then jump into an unreserved model. So we're just really happy to be able to now give our territory managers everything they need to compete.

Okay.

Your next question comes from John Gibson with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Thanks for listening to me in here. Just wondering what did you see for total volumes across the auto salvage business for you and it appears, particularly given the lack of cat events in 2025. And then what is your outlook for total salvage volumes that's incorporated into your 2026 Yeah, we haven't, we don't break down our guide to that level of detail.

I think from our perspective, our point of view is we are going to continue to gain share and grow faster than the market.

And I think that was in Jim's prepared remarks as well as mine. so that's that's our outlook from a salvage perspective yeah john i would just add if you look at our financials we give you total unit volumes in automotive so that gives you some sense so we don't provide disclosure beyond that great appreciate it congrats on the quarter thank you your next question comes from the line of john healy with north coast research your line is now open.

Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question. I kind of wanted to go in reverse a little bit. We were talking AI earlier in the call. I think this time last week was probably when the marketplace stock started getting people concerned that they could be AI casualties. So, Jim, I'd just love to get your thoughts just high level. Do you see AI as more of a friend or a foe to the business? Obviously, there will be positives, there will be negatives, I'm sure. But Could you just get to maybe a, you know, an overarching view, how you and the board are thinking about it, what kind of safeguards or, you know, evolution you're making maybe beyond just some of the tools that insurers can use to ultimately expedite their decision to total out or repair a vehicle?

Great question and happy to do it. But look, when I think about, you know, AI, I think our advantage is really built on scaled and trusted execution that AI can't really easily replicate. Our physical infrastructure, you know, the embedded workflows that we have with each and every partner, you know, the full scale of the transaction ecosystem that we built over 70 years, the prior to the data that we have, that is our prior to our data, you You know, all working together to drive this experience of bringing buyers and sellers together and the outcomes that we produce for our partners. I think it's just going to be really hard for AI alone to, you know, be able to disrupt that. But look, you know, we've long viewed technology as an enabler for us. We use innovation to improve our customer experience, how we add value, increase productivity for our teams. You know, it's really helping us drive operational efficiencies, right, where we don't have to add a person every single time. We do believe AI will change how work gets done, but it won't change, like, who ultimately wins in this space, right? But, look, look, we think there's good that comes with AI, but when we think about our business getting disrupted, it. We think we have a lot of things, like I already mentioned, that enable us to use AI as an enabler and not affect our business.

Great. And just one follow-up question to that. When I think about the assets of the salvage side in particular, as well as the CC&T business, I mean, to me, the biggest assets are your real estate, your brand, and just the reach of your customer knowing you. So when you look at AI, you know, the piece that I think I get most curious about is real estate. You know, does this evolution have the potential to change the way cycle times work in the industry? And do you think either business has vulnerability to it from a real estate standpoint, meaning that you would potentially need less real estate going forward? And does that maybe open the door to competition? So we'd just love to get your thoughts on AI and the angle of real estate as well. Thanks.

Yeah, John, look, I'll just give you an example. I am down here in Orlando this week for our big event. We have 200 acres that is completely full with equipment right now that we've had to inspect, take care of, manage. We have people walk in our yards to look at this equipment. They're about to spend a ton of money on this equipment, $200,000, $400,000. I don't think AI is going to be able to disrupt that as we go, but I do think AI can help us turn inventory quicker in our sites, which we're using today to do that. If you look at the IEA side, we've actually opened up some capacity that we can use for other productive things and how we monetize the business. So we're going to use it to become more efficient. But look, when I'm sitting here in Orlando today, it's hard for me to get my mind wrapped around how AI is going to disrupt what I'm looking at right now.

Great. Thank you for that.

There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Jim Kessler for closing remarks.

Thank you so much. Just in closing, I want to thank our RB Global team around the world and for their discipline execution and ongoing commitment which continue to drive our performance and momentum we are well positioned for the opportunities ahead and remain focused on executing our strategy delivering on our commitments and creating long-term value shareholder value thank you for your continued support and interest in RB global and talk to everyone soon this This concludes today's call.

Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.