Robert Half Inc. Q2 FY2022 Earnings Call

Hello, and welcome to the Robert Half Second Quarter 2022 Conference Call. Today's conference call is being recorded. Our hosts for today's call are Mr. Keith Waddell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Robert Half; and Mr. Michael Buckley, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Waddell, you may begin.

Hello, everyone. We appreciate your time today. Before we get started, I'd like to remind you that the comments made on today's call contain forward-looking statements, including predictions and estimates about our future performance. These statements represent our current judgment of what the future holds. However, they're subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are described in today's press release, in our most recent 10-K and 10-Q filed with the SEC. We assume no obligation to update the statements made on today's call. During this presentation, we may mention some non-GAAP financial measures and reference these figures as adjusted. Reconciliations and further explanations of these measures are included in a supplemental schedule to our earnings press release. We'd like to remind you that beginning in 2022, our financial disclosures for contract operations, formerly temporary and consulting staffing, are based on functional specialization rather than our previously branded divisions. The functional specializations are finance and accounting, administrative and customer support, and technology. Finance and accounting combines the former Accountemps and Management Resources, administrative and customer support was previously Office Team, and technology was formerly Robert Half Technology. Protiviti and our permanent placement operations continue to be reported separately. Also, what we previously referred to as our staffing operations are now referred to as talent solutions. There's no change to our underlying business operations or organization. Our presentation of revenues and the related growth rates for each of our contract functional specializations includes intersegment revenues from services provided to Protiviti in connection with the company's blended talent solutions and consulting operations. This is how we measure and manage these businesses internally. The combined amount of intersegment revenues with Protiviti is also separately disclosed. The supplemental schedules just mentioned also include a revenue schedule showing this information for 2020 through 2022. For your convenience, our prepared remarks for today's call are available at the Investor Center of our website, roberthalf.com. We are pleased to once again report very strong results, which continued to reflect a robust global labor market and demand environment. Talent solutions led the way with permanent placement and contract talent solutions growing 39% and 19%, respectively, on a year-on-year basis. Core Protiviti solutions also remained strong. I'd like to acknowledge the dedication and exemplary efforts of our entire global workforce, including talent solutions, Protiviti, and corporate services professionals who make our success possible. Company-wide revenues were $1.863 billion in the second quarter of 2022, up 18% from last year's second quarter on a reported basis and up 20% on an as-adjusted basis. Net income per share in the second quarter was $1.60, increasing 20% compared to $1.33 in the second quarter one year ago. Cash flow from operations during the quarter was $233 million. In June, we distributed a $0.43 per share cash dividend to our shareholders of record for a total cash outlay of $49 million. Our per-share dividend has grown 11.6% annually since inception in 2004. The June 2022 dividend was 13.2% higher than 2021. We also acquired approximately 900,000 Robert Half shares during the quarter for $79 million. We have 5.8 million shares available for repurchase under our Board-approved stock repurchase plan. Return on invested capital for the company was 48% in the second quarter. Now I'll turn it over to our CFO, Mike Buckley.

Thank you, Keith, and hello, everyone. As Keith noted, global revenues were $1.863 billion in the second quarter. On an as-adjusted basis, second quarter talent solutions revenues were up 24% year-over-year. U.S. talent solutions revenue was $1.071 billion, up 25% from the prior year. Non-U.S. talent solutions revenues were $295 million, up 20% year-over-year on an as-adjusted basis. We have 316 talent solutions locations worldwide, including 85 locations in 17 countries outside of the United States. In the second quarter, there were 63.4 billing days, unchanged from the same quarter one year ago. The current third quarter has 64.3 billing days compared to 64.4 billing days one year ago. Currency exchange rate movements during the second quarter had the effect of decreasing reported year-over-year total revenues by $37 million, $26 million for talent solutions and $11 million for Protiviti. This negatively impacted our year-over-year overall revenue growth by 2.3 percentage points, 2.3 percentage points for talent solutions and 2.4 percentage points for Protiviti. Contract talent solutions bill rates for the quarter increased 8.2% compared to one year ago, adjusted for changes in the mix of revenues by functional specialization, currency, and country. This rate for the first quarter of 2022 was 9.1%. Now, let's take a closer look at the results for Protiviti. Global revenues in the second quarter were $497 million, $396 million of that is from business within the United States, and $101 million is from operations outside of the United States. On an as-adjusted basis, global second quarter Protiviti revenues were up 11% versus the year-ago period, with U.S. Protiviti revenues up 8%. Non-U.S. revenues were up 21% on an as-adjusted basis. Protiviti and its independently-owned member firms serve clients through a network of 88 locations in 29 countries. Company-wide second quarter public sector revenue was $94 million, of which $70 million was reported by Protiviti and the balance reported by talent solutions. Currency exchange rates had the effect of decreasing year-over-year public sector revenues by $4 million. We expect third quarter 2022 public sector revenues to be $90 to $100 million, and we continue to expect full year 2022 public sector revenues to be flat to up 10% for the year. Turning now to gross margin. In contract talent solutions, second quarter gross margin was 39.9% of applicable revenues, compared to 39.7% of applicable revenues in the second quarter one year ago. Conversion revenues or contract-to-hire were 4.1% of revenues in the quarter. Our permanent placement talent solutions revenues in the second quarter were 14.7% of consolidated talent solutions revenues, versus 12.8% of consolidated talent solutions revenues in the same quarter one year ago. When combined with contract talent solutions gross margin, overall talent solutions gross margin was 48.7%, an increase of 1.3 percentage points compared to the year-ago second quarter. For Protiviti, gross margin was 30.4% of Protiviti revenues, compared to 29.1% of Protiviti revenues one year ago. Adjusted for deferred compensation-related classification impacts, gross margin for Protiviti was 28.1% for the quarter just ended compared to 30.0% one year ago. Gross margin in the current period was impacted by higher staff resource costs, including continued expansion of headcount in the quarter. Enterprise selling, general and administrative costs were 27.3% of global revenues in the second quarter, compared to 30.9% in the same quarter one year ago. Adjusted for deferred compensation-related classification impacts, enterprise SG&A costs were 30.3% for the quarter just ended, compared to 29.4% one year ago. Talent solutions SG&A costs were 32.2% of talent solutions revenues for the second quarter, versus 38.4% in the second quarter of 2021. Adjusted for deferred compensation-related classification impacts, talent solutions SG&A costs were 36.2% for the quarter just ended, compared to 36.3% one year ago. The higher mix of permanent placement revenues this quarter versus one year ago had the effect of adding 0.9 percentage points to the quarter’s adjusted SG&A ratio. Second quarter SG&A costs for Protiviti were 14.0% of Protiviti revenues, compared to 12.5% of revenues in the year-ago period. Operating income for the quarter was $306 million. Adjusted for deferred compensation-related classification impacts, combined segment income was $241 million in the second quarter. Combined segment margin was 12.9%. Second quarter segment income from our talent solutions divisions was $171 million, with a segment margin of 12.5%. Segment income for Protiviti in the second quarter was $70 million, with a segment margin of 14.1%. Our second quarter tax rate was 27%, the same as one year ago. At the end of the second quarter, accounts receivable was $1.092 billion and implied days sales outstanding, or DSO, was 52.6 days. Before we move to third quarter guidance, let's review some of the monthly trends we saw in the second quarter and so far in July, all adjusted for currency and billing days. Contract talent solutions exited the second quarter with June revenues up 18% versus the prior year compared to a 21% increase for the full quarter. Revenues for the first week of July were up 16% compared to the same period one year ago. Permanent placement revenues in June were up 38% versus June of 2021. This compares to a 43% increase for the full quarter. For the first two weeks of July, permanent placement revenues were up 3% compared to the same period in 2021. This period includes the historically variable impact of the Fourth of July holiday. We provide this information so that you have insight into some of the trends we saw during the second quarter and into July. But as you know, these are very brief periods of time. We caution against reading too much into them. With that in mind, we offer the following third quarter guidance: revenues of $1.87 billion to $1.95 billion; income per share of $1.60 to $1.70; midpoint revenues of $1.910 billion are 14% higher than the same period in 2021 on an as-adjusted basis. Midpoint earnings per share of $1.65 is 8% higher than 2021, notwithstanding a $0.05 negative impact for currency and a higher tax rate. Note that in the prior year, Q3 2021 revenues and EPS had very strong year-over-year growth rates of 43% and 129%, respectively. The major financial assumptions underlying the midpoint of these assumptions are as follows: revenue growth on a year-over-year basis; talent solutions up 16% to 19%; Protiviti up 6% to 9%; overall up 12% to 16%; gross margin percentage, contract talent at 38% to 40%; Protiviti at 28% to 30%; overall gross margin at 42% to 44%. SG&A as a percentage of revenue, excluding deferred compensation classification impacts: talent solutions at 36% to 37%; Protiviti at 14% to 16%; overall at 30% to 32%. Segment income: talent solutions at 11% to 13%; Protiviti at 13% to 15%; overall at 11% to 13%. Tax rate at 26% to 27%; shares at 108 million to 110 million. Third quarter capital expenditures and capitalized cloud computing costs are estimated at $25 million to $30 million. We limit our guidance to one quarter. All estimates we provide on this call are subject to the risks mentioned in today's press release and in our SEC filings. Now I'll turn the call back over to Keith.

Thank you, Mike. Global labor markets remain strong. In the United States, job openings and quit rates remain elevated and only modestly below all-time highs. The unemployment rate continues to hold near a record low, particularly those with a college degree where the rate is 2.1%. For small businesses, the National Federation of Independent Business recently reported that 94% of those hiring or trying to hire had few or no qualified applicants for open positions, and 50% of small business owners had job openings that could not be filled. Remote and hybrid working models are here to stay and provide us with a significant opportunity to capitalize on the structural shift in how companies source talent. This plays to our numerous strengths, including our global brand, office network, candidate database, and advanced AI-driven technologies. The demand environment remains strong on a broad basis, spanning industries, company size, skill level, and geographies. We continue to see our talent solutions results recovering at a faster pace than we've experienced in the past. Our permanent placement and contract talent solutions segments, including blending solutions with Protiviti, have achieved cumulative sequential growth of 180% and 63%, respectively, during the eight quarters since the pandemic trough. Similar numbers for the financial crisis and the dot-com recoveries were 78% and 36%, and 121% and 47%, respectively. Protiviti reported double-digit year-on-year adjusted revenue growth notwithstanding the previously disclosed and expected wind-down of a very large financial services regulatory remediation project and the anticipated moderation in stimulus-related public sector revenues. Internal audit and technology consulting solutions led the way. Protiviti's pipeline remains strong across each of its solution areas, particularly internal audit as clients struggle to internally staff the rising demands of this function. We continue to be optimistic about our growth prospects for the remainder of 2022, propelled by the strength of our people, our technology, our brand, and our business model. We remain steadfast in our focus on our purpose to connect people to meaningful work and provide clients with the talent and subject matter expertise they need to confidently compete and grow. Finally, we'd like to thank our people who are our greatest asset and what differentiates us in the marketplace for the significant company recognition received this quarter. We are proud to have recently ranked number one by Forbes on three prestigious lists: America's Best Professional Recruiting Firm, America's Best Temporary Staffing Firm, and America's Best Executive Recruiting Firm. This is the first time any company has placed first in all three categories. This is a credit to all of our employees and their incredible drive to deliver outstanding service to our clients and our candidates. Now Mike and I would be happy to answer your questions. Please ask just one question and a single follow-up as needed; if there is time, we will come back to you for additional questions.

And your first question comes from the line of Mark Marcon with Baird.

Thanks. Good afternoon, Keith and Mike, and congratulations on the recognition that came from Forbes. I was wondering can you talk a little bit more about what you're seeing in Protiviti? From the prepared remarks, it sounds like the overall public sector, including talent solutions, is going to be flat to up. I'm wondering, do you expect the public sector for Protiviti to be flat? And can you talk a little bit about the areas of strength that you're seeing within Protiviti since it looks like Protiviti was up 17.4% excluding the public sector? You mentioned internal audit, wondering, is that primarily young companies or is that established Fortune 2000 type companies?

So Protiviti has a very strong pipeline across its solution areas. It's aggressively adding its staff in part to fund growth and in part to bring its mix of contractors to full-time staff below 50%. It got above 50%. There was a view that that was a little too much towards the contractor, so they're bringing that mix down by adding more full-time staff. Technology consulting is hardest, as we talked about, as clients struggle to hire their own people for internal audit. There's also increasing demands. If you think about all the modernization and all the innovation projects that companies of all sizes have, there's an internal audit element to bringing the results of those projects online. That stimulates demand, and again, that's all sizes of Protiviti clients. In technology consulting, you've got data analytics and enterprise applications that are also strong. If you combine the impact of public sector plus the wind-down of the large regulatory project, their growth rate was impacted by about 12 points. And so you can take what's reported and add 12 to get the impact of those two projects that have wound down. The good news is the regulatory project, the people have been redeployed. But just to replace that means flat growth, not increasing growth on that element of their business. The point being: apart from those two very specific areas, Protiviti's core is growing very strong double digits. They're very bullish about their prospects. They're competing very effectively with the Big 4. Their margins are recovering, up 200 basis points this quarter to 14%. I understand it's not the 17% that you had last year, but last year had no travel, had no training, had very little recruiting, had no practice development. We're very happy with a 14% to 15% margin range, which is where they are. So again, apart from the two areas that we've talked about before and again today, Protiviti is growing quite nicely. Frankly, their biggest issue is not demand; their biggest issue is attracting people, which they're working on aggressively and they're being successful doing so. They won many awards of their own type. I think just this week they won a Best Place for Millennials to Work Award by the Great Places to Work organization. So they're doing quite well. So we're pleased with Protiviti. We're pleased with the results. We're pleased with its pipeline. They're working through these two issues. And I'd say too, on public sector since you asked the question, that's pretty much tracking as expected. Housing assistance, education, IT services, and project management engagements are leading the way. The public sector also struggles to compete in a tight labor market. There's been a mix shift to talent solutions in the public sector, as we've talked about, as we've expected. So Protiviti is down by more than we're down overall, because talent solutions public sector is growing. The public sector pipeline is double what it was a year ago, so we're very pleased with that. But bottom line on public sector, it pretty much tracked as expected. There was some FX impact. If you add that back, we're right in the range that we talked about. So, pleased with public sector. It's a whole new line of business for us, if you will, both talent solutions and Protiviti, but tracking as expected.

That's great. Robert Half successfully navigated through COVID, achieving an 8.3% EBITDA margin in 2020. There's uncertainty regarding whether we will experience a soft landing, a mild recession, or a more severe downturn. What is the philosophy, and how would you advise investors on how to handle the cycle if we face a mild recession in terms of managing expenses and positioning Robert Half for recovery and growth when the upturn eventually occurs?

Well, I think you correctly point to and you don't have to look very far as to how we perform in a downturn by just looking at how we did during the pandemic. And just the playbook we ran is no different than the playbook we always run on the talent solutions side. We look at the productivity of our internal staff, and the underperformers, we become less patient with than we typically would be in normal times. And so there's some rightsizing of the staff on the talent solutions side. The nice thing on the Protiviti side, Protiviti did not go down. Protiviti did not have negative revenue growth during the pandemic. Said differently, Protiviti continued to grow through the pandemic. It showed to be more resilient than is the case in staffing, and we would expect that again. So I think the other good thing about looking back at the pandemic and forward is, as we talked about in the call, the eight quarters since the trough, we've grown the fastest we've ever grown post a recession trough. And so, if a mild recession does come, you don't have to look far to see how well we came out of it, both from a revenue standpoint and a profitability standpoint.

Terrific. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Heather Balsky with Bank of America.

Hi. Thank you for taking my question. Can you talk a little bit about the permanent placement part of your business and kind of just the strength you're seeing and how long do you think this can last? And your comfort in, I guess, that number as a higher percentage of revenue. Just how you're thinking about that business?

Permanent replacement is actually one of the strongest parts of talent solutions. As we've discussed earlier, it grew 39% year-on-year on tough comparisons. Virtually to a person, when you talk to our people, they're probably the most bullish about permanent placement, given the state of the labor market, which remains strong, given the talent shortages that exist; many companies, even today, prefer to hire full-time. And that's beneficial for permanent placement. So to show our confidence in permanent placement, it's an area where we're hiring the most aggressively internally because, frankly, the productivity level of our current staff is so high. I mean, the only way we're going to grow permanent placement is to have some more internal resources. So we feel good about permanent placement. We just talked to all of our people, and they feel good about permanent placement, so we're bullish on permanent placement.

Thank you. And given you had all the concerns about a potential downturn, how are you thinking about managing your costs in this strong environment today but given the risk of potentially slower labor market in the near term?

Yes. I talked a little bit with Mark about how we deal with our staff costs. I think we've got a long track record across many downturns of rightsizing our staff relative to expected revenue trends, and we would do the same. What we're not going to do is make itself fulfilling and cut in advance of that. There is so much noise about whether there's going to be a recession, how deep there's going to be a recession, when the recession might occur. There are so many conflicting signals. The one thing we are not going to do is cut in advance of that. And we've told our people, it is business as usual. We will continue to feed the hot hands, which include permanent placement, management resources, and our full-time engagement professionals. We're going to continue to feed those hot hands as long as they're hot. We will manage everything else on a productivity basis, which is the way we've always managed the business, and we're very confident and comfortable about that.

Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Steinerman with JPMorgan.

Hi, it's Andrew. I have two questions. You mentioned that foreign exchange was a larger-than-expected revenue challenge in the second quarter. Could you provide the impact on earnings per share from foreign exchange in that quarter? My second question is about a potential scenario. What would happen if we avoid a recession and experience more of a soft landing with an extended cycle? I'm curious about your perspective on contract gross margins. They were 39.9% this quarter, similar to last quarter, but your guidance indicates they are expected to be between 38% and 40%, suggesting a sequential decrease. Are you concerned that if we have a prolonged expansion, contract gross margins may have already reached their peak?

Sure. The EPS impact for Q2 from foreign exchange is $0.02, and for Q3, it's $0.025 for foreign exchange and $0.025 for the tax rate. Regarding the possibility of no recession, we emphasize that we are continuing with business as usual to not miss out on current opportunities. We have a positive outlook on contract gross margins. As we shift toward higher skill levels, they generally provide higher gross margins. Additionally, moving to full-time professionals leads to higher gross margins. The tight labor market is beneficial for conversions, which also contributes to higher gross margins. Furthermore, as permanent placements remain strong, the ratio of permanent to contract placements increasingly favors permanent, aiding overall gross margins. While we may have been slightly conservative in our overall guidance, particularly on gross margins, I assure you that if there is no recession, we are very optimistic about our contract gross margins.

Thank you. That’s perfect.

Your next question comes from the line of Kevin McVeigh with Credit Suisse.

Great. Thanks so much. And congratulations again on the Forbes recognition. Hey, Keith, circling back to Protiviti, on the government side, is there any way to think about the funding of the projects that occurred in Protiviti? You know how much of that was any kind of federal versus state? And is there any kind of sequencing you'd call out as to some of that running off as opposed to maybe getting renewed? Is there any way to think about that within the context of Protiviti?

Well, first of all, it's more state and local than federal. It's not all state and local, but it's more state and local than federal. So the housing assistance and the education is more state and local. As to the runoff, we've been very transparent about what our numbers were by quarter split between talent solutions and Protiviti for all of 2021. We've now broken that out for 2022. We've said that for full year 2022, notwithstanding some of the stimulus-related work that has run off, we expect to be flat to up. And so we've said about as many ways as we know how that sure, some of the stimulus-related work is declining. We are backfilling that, particularly on an enterprise basis with all the other project work that I talked about, such that when you put all the pieces together, on a company-wide basis, we think we'll be flat to up slightly, notwithstanding the runoff that you described.

Got it. And then the remixing of kind of full-time versus supplemental staff on Protiviti, what's the optimal mix there? And I guess, what drove the decision? Was it kind of service delivery or just the remixing, I guess, of staff?

In the last few quarters, over 50% of the hours worked have been on a contract basis. If you had asked me five years ago, I would have thought that the maximum contractor percentage at Protiviti would be around 30%. It’s impressive that we've surpassed 50%. However, there are practical considerations regarding the careers of our employees. A 50/50 split seems reasonable to me; it’s not a fixed rule, but more a matter of perspective. The work characteristics vary by project type. For certain special projects, there's one mix, while recurring annual internal audits may require a different approach. A 50/50 split is an exceptional achievement, demonstrating how effectively our resources can assist Protiviti and its clients, significantly contributing to growth. We should consider the 50/50 ratio, which aligns more with traditional practices over the past few years, and evaluate its implications. Overall, the collaboration between Protiviti and talent solutions has created a remarkable success story, benefiting both the enterprise and Protiviti's clients.

Make sense. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of George Tong with Goldman Sachs.

Hi. Thanks. Good afternoon. Do you expect full year 2022 public sector revenues to be flat to up 10% for the year? Can you discuss how much public sector Protiviti revenues will go up by or how it will perform for the year and what will drive potential growth in public sector Protiviti spend?

The distinction between talent solutions and Protiviti in terms of reporting is somewhat arbitrary. Often, the same individuals working on one project might be classified under Protiviti due to the nature of the contracting, while on another project, they may fall under talent solutions. Therefore, it's more sensible to consider this from a company-wide perspective. However, it's clear that many of the areas experiencing the most rapid growth in the public sector currently lean more towards talent solutions, such as housing assistance and education. Nonetheless, Protiviti is actively pursuing RFPs and has a strong success rate with the contracts they secure. Historically, even during peak public sector activity, contractors comprised 90% of the hours worked. Consequently, whether those contractors' earnings are categorized as talent solutions or Protiviti revenue can often depend on the specifics of the client contract, which frequently aligns with GSA schedules unique to Protiviti. This adds an element of randomness in distinguishing between talent solutions and Protiviti within the public sector, which is why it's preferable to assess the situation holistically. Overall, we expect to be flat to up 10%.

Got it. And this is a higher-level question, I guess, stepping back. As you think about the overall macro environment, what are some areas where you're seeing potential weakness? If you had to rank order, you pointed out areas of strength. What are the areas where you see potential cracks in the armor?

Well, I'm not sure I would call it cracks in the armor. I would start by saying while labor markets and demand environment's very strong, it's not quite as strong as it was last quarter. I'd say clients are taking a little longer to make offers. Often, they want to see one more candidate or they want to interview their finalists one more time, or they want to insist on the person work on site, particularly if it's at the operations level. That said, they also understand if they drag their feet too long, they're going to lose the candidate. So, I would say, if anything, if we're going to talk on the negative side, clients are taking a little longer to make their offers. That said, candidates are still in demand. Candidates are still short. I talked about the multiple offers. I talked about the counter offers. It's still a candidate-driven market, but clients are taking a little longer with an underscore on the word little to make their offers.

Got it. Very helpful. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Kartik Mehta with Northcoast Research.

Hi. Good afternoon. I know you've mentioned that talent procurement remains challenging. I'm curious if the situation has improved at all over the past three to six months, particularly in terms of seeing more candidates or if the market has loosened up in any way.

There has been no significant improvement in the shortage of candidates. In fact, with rising gas prices, candidates are more hesitant to work remotely and prefer not to commute to client sites. This creates a conflict between what clients want, which is for the candidates to be on-site two or three days a week, and what the candidates desire. Candidates now want to work remotely even more than they did 90 days ago, while clients are requesting more on-site presence than they did three months ago. Our team must navigate this gap between the two sides to facilitate agreements.

And just as a follow-up. Any change in wage inflation? It seems like based on your comments, probably not since it's still difficult to get talent, but curious if you've seen any change in growth rate on wage inflation?

No. It tracks closely with bill rate changes. And we talked about this quarter, it was around 8%, and last quarter, it was around 9%. I think the quarter before that, it was around 8%. So it's been around 8% or 9% on the bill rate side. And you can take a couple of points off of that to get what the pay rate is.

Thank you very much. I really appreciate it.

Your next question comes from the line of Manav Patnaik with Barclays.

Thank you. Keith, I was just wondering like what are some of the leading indicators that you would look for in terms of when it won't be business as usual? Like Protiviti on the consulting side, something that will give you that lead. And I know you showed some deceleration, but it's only the first week of July. So, just curious what you track or what you need to see to change some of the business patterns.

Well, I'd first say the first few weeks of July are very holiday impacted, so we read virtually nothing into that one way or the other. In the leading indicators, if you look back over prior downturns, when you first look at perm placement versus contract, they're mostly coincident. Maybe perm leads a little bit versus contract, but there's certainly no external data we can look to, whether it be BLS, SIA, ASA, any other of the economic ISI, you name it; there's no magic external data. We've found that helpful in its predicted this or as a leading indicator. We get weekly data on the contract side. We get daily data on the perm placement side. And so there's nothing like our own data that helps us out. And as I said, we just talked to our key people this week. And while they said it's not quite as strong as it was last quarter, it's still very strong and they feel very good. Frankly, the numbers they submitted for the coming quarter are stronger than what we published because we were just a little more conservative. But our people feel good.

Okay. And given that it sounds pretty good, obviously and the stock has pulled back, I mean, I guess I'm just curious, any changes in your capital allocation philosophy?

Our capital allocation policy forever has been, first, do what's necessary for the business, which is principally around technology innovation spending, which we're doing. Then we look to continue the dividend and grow the dividend. We talked on the call earlier about we've grown the dividend double digits since inception. And with the balance, we dollar cost average, the balance of our free cash flow; we dollar cost average stock buybacks. And so sometimes the stock is up, sometimes it's down, sometimes you feel like it's undervalued, sometimes you feel like it's overvalued. What we do is we're there, we're consistent, we dollar cost average, and over time, it works its way out. And we continue to do that as we speak. You can look at our free cash flow. You can look at our financing on our cash flow statement, and we're pretty much spending all our free cash flow between tech internal innovation, dividends, and repurchases.

Got it. Thank you so much, Keith.

Your next question comes from the line of Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities.

Thank you. Given your long tenure in the industry, is there an example in any geography of what some people are now calling a jobful recession should we hit the soft landing and have the firm labor market maintain that characteristic?

As I sit here, nothing comes to mind. I think the head-scratcher for many is given how strong the labor markets are if, in fact, we're beginning a recession, how impactful is that strong starting to how the labor markets will perform? And is there enough slack in all those job openings that actual jobs won't be that impacted or instead will actual jobs, will actual unemployment be impacted? All we can say is what I've already said; as we speak and as we look forward to the coming quarter, our people are very positive. The markets are very strong. There's a lot of demand from our clients, not quite as much as the prior quarter, but it's very strong. We can do very well in the environment like the one we're in.

Excellent. My follow-up is, you talked about a previous question, you asked about external data that you may look at. In your prepared remarks, you cite some NFIB data is favorable and there's some hiring components that do demonstrate yet back. Yet the overall survey fell to a 13-year low. How do you square the overall sentiment declining so precipitously and then tie it to the labor components?

And so I think you're talking about the optimization index. One of the reasons why their optimism fell is because they're having a hard time finding people. And so that's how you square the two pieces. They're somewhat pessimistic because they're having trouble finding the people they need to grow their business. The other piece of that is inflation.

Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Silber with BMO Capital Markets.

Thanks so much. I apologize. I joined late, so if this question was asked, just please ignore me. I'm just curious in terms of your own internal hiring, recruiters, account managers, et cetera, how that's been tracking so far this year and what plans you have for the rest of the year?

And so we've aggressively added to the areas that are growing the fastest. And for us, that starts with permanent placement, management resources, and full-time engagement professionals. All three of those areas are still strong as we sit here, and we have plans to continue to add staff in those areas because the productivity of those people currently in those areas is high. And the only way we can take advantage of those hot markets is to continue to add to staff. For our other practice groups, we manage on a productivity basis, and only as productivity dictates do we add the staff there. But we haven't changed our policy. And as I said, I don't know whether you're on the call; the last thing we're going to do is make a downturn self-fulfilling by not feeding the hot hands that I just described.

Okay, that's really helpful. And then I know there was an FX impact on revenues in the rest of the business in the quarter, but specifically focusing on revenues. If I take that out, you still came in at the low end of guidance or maybe at the midpoint of guidance. Are there any specific segments that either outperformed or underperformed during the quarter?

I'd say the one that struggled the most was our administrative and customer service, and that's the one most closely tied to public sector. So other than that, there was no big story, and most of the revenue differential was currency-related.

Thank you for taking my question. I have a straightforward inquiry regarding your permanent placement business. I see this business as needing to strike a balance between the demand for full-time candidates and the available supply. According to the JOLTS data, there has been a long-standing shortage in candidate supply. Looking at your first half revenues, which reached about $387 million for permanent placements, there has been a 29% increase compared to the first half of 2021 and a 23% increase over the latter half of 2021. Given this growth, I'm curious where you are sourcing additional candidates for these placements. Thank you.

And so on the permanent placement side, by and large, we recruit people that already have a full-time job to change jobs and take a new job. And so, we've got the entire universe of people currently employed that we recruit from on the permanent placement side.

Okay. I'd like to expand on that answer. Some refer to it as The Great Resignation, but I see it more as churn or job hopping. How does Robert Half find the balance between clients who want candidates that will stay long-term and justify their fees, and candidates seeking to leverage a strong job market for higher pay or better work arrangements? Is there a conflict, and how do you manage the trade-off between serving the candidates and the employers? Thank you.

Well, I'd say most of the great reshuffle is not candidate makes a change and then shortly after makes another change. It's more that first change for career and/or compensation purposes they make the change. And so, while there's some of the former, that's the exception rather than the rule. And so, I mean, we guarantee that if they do leave, we replace them on a reduced basis. But other than that, I don't think we've seen a major business problem of candidates we place the first time in large numbers then leave in a relatively short period of time for yet a better opportunity. So, I guess it's possible, but I'm just saying, on the ground, that's certainly not the norm.

Keith, I have a couple of quick follow-up questions. First, there weren't any questions about international aspects during the call. Could you share your insights on what you're observing on a country-by-country basis? We can see the overall trends, but are there any distinct patterns emerging between the countries, especially in Europe?

Well, I'd say we're strong in the U.K. We're particularly strong in Germany. And the really nice thing about Germany is that Germany talent solutions and Protiviti are going to market very well. And in fact, it may be our most successful country where Protiviti and talent solutions go to market together. And both are benefiting accordingly, and their outlook, notwithstanding all the talk about energy, Russia, etc., the German outlook is still quite good because of those managed business solution opportunities they jointly have.

Great. And any areas that are pulling back or that seem a little bit weaker?

I think Belgium was a little softer this quarter than normal, but we expect it to be better in the coming quarter. But there's no real major outlier in a negative way, Belgium included.

Great. And then just the pipeline for Protiviti, how much visibility do you have into the pipeline for projects that would start in Q4? The reason why I'm asking is because the comps become significantly easier when we get to Q4. You obviously had really strong comps for Protiviti in Q2 and Q3. So, just wondering if maybe we can have an inflection point in Q4?

Well, I haven't looked at their pipeline based on when it starts, and my guess is they actually have it. I just don't have it at the top of my head. But their pipeline is strong. They're people constrained; they're not demand constrained. And internal audit is by leaps and bounds their hottest area, as I talked about. Their clients can't staff their own internal audit departments. They need help. Their clients, as they have their modernization and innovation projects, those projects usually require internal audit before they go live. There's more of that. So, good old internal audit, which is Protiviti’s long-term core business, is its strongest. And it's a wonderful thing.

And Q4 is a strong quarter for that?

That's correct. In Q3, there is typically an increase in the Sarbanes-Oxley work, which continues into Q4. The seasonal patterns and the guidance we've provided reflect this seasonal increase in Protiviti, mainly due to the Sarbanes-Oxley internal audit work.

Great. Thank you.

Okay, I believe that is our last question. We appreciate everybody joining. Thank you very much.

This concludes today's teleconference. If you missed any part of the call, it will be archived in audio format in the Investor Center of Robert Half's website at roberthalf.com. You can also dial the conference call replay. Dial-in details and the confirmation code are contained in the company's press release issued earlier today. Thank you.