Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Thomson Reuters Third Quarter Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Gary Bisbee, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thanks, Jenny. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today for our third quarter 2025 earnings call. I'm joined today by our CEO, Steve Hasker; and our CFO, Mike Eastwood, each of whom will discuss our results and take your questions following their remarks. Throughout today's presentation, when we compare performance period-on-period, we discuss revenue growth rates before currency as well as on an organic basis. We believe this provides the best basis to measure the underlying performance of the business. Today's presentation contains forward-looking statements and non-IFRS and other supplemental financial measures, which are discussed on this special note slide. Actual results may differ materially due to a number of risks and uncertainties discussed in reports and filings that we provide to regulatory agencies. You may access these documents on our website or by contacting our Investor Relations department. Let me now turn it over to Steve Hasker.

Thank you, Gary, and thanks to all of you for joining us today. Momentum continued in the third quarter with revenue in line and margins modestly ahead of our expectations. Total company organic revenues rose 7% with the Big 3 segments growing by 9%. In addition, healthy revenue flow-through, beneficial revenue mix and good cost discipline boosted margins, driving profit ahead of expectations. We are reaffirming our full year 2025 revenue and profit outlook, including our expectation for approximately 9% organic revenue growth for the Big 3 segments. For the full year, our total and organic revenue growth is trending closer to 3% and 7%, respectively, rather than the higher end of the ranges at 3.5% and 7.5% for three reasons that are unrelated to our AI innovation momentum. First, a slower ramp of commercial print volumes; secondly, several recent U.S. federal government cancellations and downgrades; and third, slightly softer bookings trends at corporates following internal sales organizational changes aimed at improving future cross-selling. We see these as temporary factors not related to our growing innovation and AI-driven momentum, which continues to build. This is best illustrated by our Legal Professionals segment accelerating to 9% organic revenue growth in the quarter, up from 8% in the first half of 2025 and 7% last year. And this is driven by continued Westlaw momentum and strong double-digit growth from both CoCounsel and CoCounsel drafting. Outside of legal, we continue to see double-digit growth from a number of key franchises, including SafeSend, Confirmation, Pagero, Indirect Tax and our international businesses to name a few. Looking to next year, we're updating our 2026 financial framework. We continue to expect organic revenue of 7.5% to 8%, including approximately 9.5% for the Big 3. And we now see larger year-over-year margin expansion and higher free cash flow than in our prior outlook. On the product front, customer feedback on the Agentic AI launches over the summer has been very positive and initial sales trends are encouraging, especially for the CoCounsel legal integrated offer, Westlaw Advantage and CoCounsel for tax, audit and accounting. The competitive dynamics for our core content-enabled technology offerings for Westlaw, Practical Law and our tax engines remains stable. We see incremental competition in the AI assistant space, which is an exciting white space growth opportunity in which CoCounsel remains a clear market leader. Our capital capacity and liquidity remain an asset that we are focused on deploying to create shareholder value. We recently completed the $1 billion share repurchase program announced in mid-August, and we remain extremely well capitalized with a net leverage of only 0.6 times at quarter end. We remain committed to a balanced capital allocation approach, and we continue to assess additional inorganic opportunities. With our estimated $9 billion of capital capacity through 2027 after the completion of the buyback, we are positioned to be both aggressive and opportunistic. Now to the results for the quarter. Third quarter organic revenues grew 7%, in line with our expectations. Organic recurring and transactional revenue grew at 9% and 4%, respectively, while print revenue declined 4%. Adjusted EBITDA increased 10% to $672 million, reflecting a 240 basis point margin increase to 37.7%, higher than anticipated due to healthy operating leverage and good cost discipline. Turning to the third quarter results by segment. The Big 3 segments delivered 9% organic revenue growth. Legal organic revenue grew 9%, improving from 8% in the first half of 2025 and 7% for all of last year. Continued momentum from Westlaw and CoCounsel were key drivers. Organic revenues in corporates grew 7%, driven by offerings in our legal, tax and risk portfolios and the segment's international businesses. Tax & Accounting organic revenues grew 10%, driven by our Latin American and U.S. businesses. Reuters News organic revenues rose 3%, driven by growth in the agency business and our contract with LSEG. And lastly, Global Print organic revenues declined 4% year-on-year. In summary, we're pleased with our Q3 results. I'll now comment briefly on questions that we've heard in recent months about the value of our content, specifically Westlaw in an AI environment and whether it could be replicated by large language models or newer AI competitors. We remain very confident in Westlaw's differentiation, which we believe has increased significantly with the development of Deep Research and Agentic AI and the recent launch of Westlaw Advantage. It is very important to understand that litigation is high stakes work with no room for error and significant consequences for being wrong. As a result, professional-grade legal research and workflow tools need to deliver comprehensive, accurate and up-to-date outputs through trusted solutions with robust data privacy commitments. This is a very high bar, particularly given the scale, complexity and constant change of the legal ecosystem. In the United States, there are hundreds of court systems and tens of millions of annual rulings. We collect content from more than 3,500 sources in multiple formats, and it is completely unstructured. On an annual basis, we process more than 300 million documents into Westlaw. In addition, we have valuable and proprietary second source content, including practical law. Collection of source content is just step one. Our more than 1,500 attorney editors armed with cutting-edge technologies turn the massive volume of unstructured data into structured proprietary content and intelligence. This includes linking cases, codifying statutes and regulations, authoring headnotes and increasingly creating new content for our AI offerings. In total, our team delivers more than 1.6 million editorial enhancements per year. Primary law content, including case law, statutes and regulations is a significant majority of what users search in Westlaw, and 85%, I repeat, 85%, of this content has been editorially enhanced. So 85% is editorially enhanced. These enhancements are proprietary to Westlaw and make the source content far more valuable. Let me provide a few brief examples. First, the West Key Number System is our proprietary taxonomy or subject classification of the law. It covers more than 140,000 precise legal topic categories, capturing the law at an extremely granular level. The organization of case law, statutes and regulations against this taxonomy is key to the delivery of comprehensive and accurate results, allowing Westlaw users to zero in on very specific points of law. Second, KeyCite, our proprietary citation network has more than 1.4 billion connections linking legal matters with the taxonomy. KeyCite verifies whether a case, statute, or regulation is still good law and finds accurate citing references to support legal arguments. And lastly, headnotes are summaries of the important issues of law within a case and are indexed against the key number system. This allows users to efficiently and accurately pinpoint the cases that best match their facts and desired outcome. To illustrate how the Westlaw content and editorial capabilities deliver value in an AI world, this slide outlines the key steps in our Agentic approach for Westlaw Advantage. As you can see, our AI agents leverage Westlaw's breadth and depth of content. And critically, the extensive expertise of our editorial teams and the significant editorial enhancements that we create differentiates our agents, the output of which is delivered as professional-grade research that lawyers can trust. This graphic highlights another important differentiator for Westlaw. When doing legal research, validating research results is a key final step in the process. This is doubly important with any AI outputs, which need to be checked for inaccuracies and hallucinations. In Westlaw, we have the leading tool set to deliver these validations, bringing confidence to our users that their citations are accurate and their legal arguments are correctly characterizing the law. The validation process leverages several tools I've already mentioned, including Key Number System, KeyCite, and Headnotes. In addition, the litigation document analyzer reviews legal briefs before they are submitted to the court, identifying inaccurate citations and misstatements of law. Combined with the industry's most robust editorial curated content set, the Westlaw tools provide lawyers with assurance that their legal arguments are on point, and they have done all that they can to prepare for court. While general-purpose models can find cases to potentially make a legal argument, delivering against the industry's need for comprehensive, accurate, and current research is an extremely high bar. Our market-leading content, our editorial enhancement, and our sophisticated tool set have been built over decades to consistently deliver this standard while meeting the industry's data privacy and security needs. Looking forward, we see the evolution of AI from information retrieval and summarization to more complex Agentic workflows as an opportunity for Thomson Reuters that reinforces the value and critical importance of our content and editorial expertise. In complex multi-step work, quality content to ground the outputs and subject matter expertise to train and fine-tune the AI are critical to delivering professional-grade results. Our innovation focus is squarely on leveraging these assets, leading content and the deepest bench of domain experts in our end markets to deliver agentic solutions that are difficult, if not impossible, to replicate. I'll now turn it over to Mike to review our financial performance.

Thanks, Steve. Thanks again for joining us today. As a reminder, I will talk through revenue growth before currency and on an organic basis. Let me start by discussing the third quarter revenue performance for our Big 3 segments. Organic revenue grew 9% in the third quarter, continuing the strong trend from recent periods. Legal Professionals organic revenue grew 9%, improving from 8% in the first half, driven primarily by Westlaw, CoCounsel, CoCounsel Drafting and our international businesses. Government grew 9% in the quarter. In our Corporate segment, organic revenues grew 9%. Recurring revenue grew 9%, while transactional rose 5%. Direct and Indirect Tax, Pagero, Practical Law and our international businesses were key contributors. Looking forward, the Corporate segment growth rate is likely to moderate in the fourth quarter due to the softer-than-planned bookings growth Steve mentioned. Tax & Accounting delivered another strong quarter with organic growth of 10%. Recurring and transactional revenues grew 9% and 12%, respectively. Our Latin America business, SafeSend, UltraTax, and the Cloud Audit family of products were key drivers. Moving to Reuters News. Organic revenue rose 3% for the quarter, driven primarily by growth at the agency business and from the news agreement with the data and analytics business of LSEG. Reuters revenue included approximately $7 million of transactional generative AI content licensing revenue in the quarter compared to $8 million in the prior year quarter. Finally, Global Print revenues decreased 4% on an organic basis. On a consolidated basis, third quarter organic revenues increased 7%. At the end of Q3, the percent of our annualized contract value or ACV from products that are Gen AI-enabled was 24%, up from 22% last quarter. Turning to our profitability. Adjusted EBITDA for the Big 3 segments was $606 million, up 9% from the prior year period, with the margin rising 220 basis points to 41.7%. Moving to Reuters News, adjusted EBITDA was $42 million with a margin of 19.9%. Global Print's adjusted EBITDA was $46 million with a margin of 37.1%. In aggregate, total company adjusted EBITDA was $672 million, a 10% increase versus Q3 2024, reflecting a 240 basis point margin increase to 37.7%. Turning to earnings per share. Adjusted EPS was $0.85 for the quarter versus $0.80 in the prior year period. Currency had a $0.01 positive impact on adjusted EPS in the quarter. Let me now turn to our free cash flow. For the first 9 months of 2025, our free cash flow was approximately $1.4 billion, down 3% from the prior year. Changes in working capital, which are largely timing related, were the largest driver of the decrease. I will also provide a quick update on our capital allocation. In late October, we completed the $1 billion share repurchase program we announced in mid-August, acquiring approximately 6 million of our shares. I will conclude with a discussion of our 2025 outlook and 2026 financial framework. As Steve outlined, we are reaffirming our 2025 outlook across all metrics. Our total and organic revenue growth is trending closer to 3% and 7%, respectively, rather than the higher end of the ranges at 3.5% and 7.5% for three reasons unrelated to our AI innovation momentum, as Steve mentioned. I will provide a bit more color. First, our Global Print segment has seen a slower-than-expected ramp in commercial print volumes thus far in 2025, which we believe will impact total organic revenue growth by approximately 25 basis points for the year. As a reminder, 10% of our print revenue comes from commercial, where we print books for third-party publishers. Second, our government business, while holding up well overall, has faced a handful of recent downgrades and losses related to the federal efficiency programs that we believe will be an approximate 20 basis point drag to full year organic revenue growth. Third, as I mentioned earlier, we have seen softer bookings trends at our Corporate segment, reflecting the impact of internal sales organizational changes aimed at supporting an increasingly integrated product proposition and driving improved future cross-selling. While these changes have contributed to a slower sales build in 2025 versus our initial expectations, we remain confident in our corporate product portfolio and the segment's growth potential. Note, these organizational changes were only made at our Corporate segment and do not impact our Legal Professionals or Tax & Accounting segments, which have separate sales organizations. Despite these headwinds, we remain confident in achieving our 9% Big 3 organic revenue growth outlook for the year with strong innovation-led momentum continuing in our Legal Professionals and Tax & Accounting Professionals businesses and from our international markets. Turning to the fourth quarter. We expect organic revenue growth of approximately 7%, including approximately 9% for the Big 3. Legal Professionals is likely to again deliver 9% organic revenue growth, assuming no incremental government headwinds materialize. We expect the Q4 adjusted EBITDA margin to be approximately 39%, which includes select one-time investments we are making to transform and increasingly automate how we work. Looking beyond 2025, we are updating our 2026 financial framework to incorporate a more positive margin expansion and free cash flow outlook. We reiterate our outlook for 7.5% to 8% organic revenue growth, driven by approximately 9.5% growth at the Big 3 segments. We are confident in delivering the revenue acceleration this implies driven by positive underlying momentum, the execution of our innovation road maps and, to a lesser extent, easier comparisons in several areas, including at Reuters News and Corporates. We now expect to deliver approximately 100 basis points of adjusted EBITDA margin expansion, up from our prior view of 50 or more basis points. Healthy operating leverage, combined with early benefits from using AI and technology to reengineer how we work, provide confidence in this outlook. We are also raising our free cash flow outlook for 2026 to approximately $2.1 billion, which is the upper end of the prior range of $2 billion to $2.1 billion. Our expectations for capital intensity and tax rate remain unchanged. We are currently in our 2026 planning cycle, and we'll provide more detailed 2026 guidance on our Q4 conference call in February. I will now turn it back to Gary for any questions.

Thanks. Jenny, we're ready to start the Q&A.

And our first question is going to come from Drew McReynolds from RBC.

Appreciate all the detail as usual. Two questions for me. I guess, first on the government and corporate headwinds. I guess the question is ultimately, what's kind of recurring into next year? And for corporates, I believe the organic revenue growth target is 9% to 11%. Just wondering how comfortable you still are with that? And then secondly, Steve, great kind of rundown essentially of the moat within Westlaw. I know it's early days on Agentic AI. Can you comment on the customer kind of reaction to what Agentic is doing from their perspective? And are they able in these first iterations to notice the difference between what you're offering and maybe some others that don't have the deep content access?

Yes. Drew, great questions. Let me start with Corporates, and then I'll ask Mike to supplement that. Then I'll go to government, then I'll go to Westlaw. So please be patient, but we'll work our way through these questions. So look, the Corporates sales softness is a bit frustrating because it's temporary and it's self-inflicted. So two points. One, we remain even more confident in the end market opportunity. We've said for a while that the TAM is the biggest opportunity for us in Corporates relative to the other segments. And it's the area in which we have the lowest penetration of our legal, tax, and risk products. So we think it's our biggest opportunity. And our product set is, we think, pristine and well received by customers. And so we started to see glimpses of this promise last year, as you'll remember, with 10% growth. And underpinning that, we've seen a really nice escalation in our NPS scores across the segments and including in Corporates. But what we haven't seen is an uptick in cross-sell. So at the start of this year, we expanded our global account footprint, and we asked our salespeople to sell more than one product grouping. And I think in retrospect, we got a little ahead of our sort of commercial systems and our infrastructure in doing that. So we've left some of our salespeople, I think, a little disorganized relative to the opportunities and relative to where they were last year. So not up to our high standards. We're through this. We'll learn from it, and we'll be better for it. We've got no more changes in the pipeline and very confident in the 9% to 11% for next year. So that's on the Corporates side. Mike, what would you add to that before we go to government?

Terrific summary, Steve.

Okay. So regarding government, I want to highlight a few points. Our solutions for the government sector, whether in legal or law enforcement and risk areas, align well with the administration's focus on efficiency and law enforcement. We've experienced solid growth at the state and local levels, and on the federal side, our teams have effectively established the essential nature of our solutions this year. Up until the end of the third quarter, everything was positive, although we did see some downgrades and cancellations towards the quarter's end, leading us to monitor the situation closely. Looking at the medium to long term, we are confident about our value proposition across federal, state, and local markets since tools like Westlaw Advantage, CoCounsel, and our diverse tax solutions enhance government agencies' efficiencies. Our law enforcement efforts through CLEAR and TRSS also align well with the administration’s agenda. While we are optimistic about the government sector in the medium to long term, we acknowledge it is a turbulent environment and want to express that uncertainty for the next year ahead. Now, turning to Westlaw, we recently launched Westlaw Advantage, the first Deep Research and Agentic research product. Customer feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, as has been the response to CoCounsel and their integration. For instance, I spoke with a managing partner at a major New York City firm. He’s well known for his litigation background and shared how he has spent much of his career refining arguments with his colleagues. However, since gaining access to Westlaw Advantage, he finds himself using our tool more for this process than collaborating with his partners. This shift in behavior is indicative of how he is now focused on crafting the most refined arguments, anticipating counterarguments, and considering the likely responses from judges. We are thrilled with the progress made by Mike Dane, Omar, and the team in developing this product and plan to keep investing in it to enhance the verification and validation tools and enrich the product. Mike, would you like to add anything?

Nothing to add, Steve.

Thanks, Drew. I hope that addresses the questions.

And our next question is going to come from Vince Valentini from TD Cowen.

Can I just go back to the government for a second? I just want to make sure I’m clear on what the driver is. Is the government shutdown having an impact or these cancellations happened before that? And can you clarify, do you do work for ICE?

Vince, in regards to the first question, the downgrades and cancellations occurred prior to the shutdown. The shutdown has very minimal impact on our quarterly revenue based on what we know today. So this occurred prior to the government shutdown. Steve, do you want to address the ICE question?

Yes. I won't go into the specifics of the work we do with various government agencies due to confidentiality clauses. However, we collaborate with several departments on various law enforcement matters, and we always adhere to our trust principles.

Can I maybe rephrase it? Maybe I shouldn't have been so specific. Is there any chance that the government spending is being temporarily redirected and that's impacting some of the contracts with you and that will ebb and flow over time, but should come back?

I believe this administration is focusing more on certain priorities than others, which is leading to an adjustment period. In response to Drew's question, our tools provide two key benefits for government agencies: they enhance efficiency and serve as essential resources for law enforcement. We are confident that our crucial role will not only be maintained but also strengthened over time. However, we are experiencing some turbulence as certain programs are being cut during this transition.

Yes, Vince, we will continue to collaborate with our federal customers in three primary areas: efficiency, national security, and fraud prevention. We are confident that our tools and offerings will effectively support them in the midterm and long term.

I'm going to count that as one, Gary, I apologize, but it was 1a and 1b. Just the second question, you got a nice call out on the Amazon call last week on being one of their key customers for their transform product, they say Thomson Reuters has been able to manipulate 1.5 million lines of code per month 4 times faster than they could with previous systems. I'm wondering, is this part of an initial effort to automate more of your internal cost structure and processes? And is there more of this to come over the next couple of years? And what could that potentially mean for future margins?

Thank you, Vince. We are committed to leading the AI transformation in two main areas. First, in our product development, especially regarding Agentic AI and Deep Research, which we demonstrated with our initial legal product launches at ILTACON in August. We also have an upcoming project in our Tax & Accounting division slated for review in December and January, and we are excited about these developments. Additionally, we were pleased to see Amazon reference our efforts with AI and automation tools. We are utilizing our products, including CoCounsel Legal and CoCounsel for Tax, Accounting, and Audit, within Norie Campbell's General Counsel team and Mike's finance, audit, and accounting teams, where we are observing promising results. Furthermore, as Amazon mentioned, we are leveraging the best tools to enhance automation. I will let Mike discuss the financial implications, but I want to assure you that we will remain at the forefront of automating our processes to scale more efficiently while improving our product and service offerings for our customers.

Yes, Vince, a few thoughts. As noted in my prepared remarks, we do anticipate some one-time investment in Q4 2025 to help us transform and increasingly automate how we work. To Steve's point, as we look into 2026, certainly, we view the example that you questioned and Steve addressed as opportunities to help us expand our EBITDA margin. It's one of the reasons why we were able today to expand our EBITDA margin expectations for 2026 by 100 basis points. We're not discussing guidance today beyond 2026, but I think these developments certainly are encouraging for the long term. Vince, while we have the mic, it might be helpful for everyone if I just clarify that when we say for 2026, increasing margin by 100 basis points, that will be 100 basis points off the actual result for fiscal year 2025. Just wanted to clarify that point.

And our next question is going to come from Jason Haas from Wells Fargo.

In the prepared remarks, you made a comment about seeing some incremental competition in AI assistant space. So I was curious if you could just unpack that comment a little bit more. What was meant by that exactly?

Yes. Jason, thanks for the question. So the point that I'm trying to make is that we are not seeing any additional competition in our core franchises. So that's legal research and legal know-how and the tax calculation engines, whether that's UltraTax, GoSystem tax or ONESOURCE. So those core franchises have the same competitive dynamics today as they did 12 months ago or 3 years ago. Where we have seen the entrance of new players is in the AI assistant space. Now that is a greenfield sort of white space opportunity for us. And it was the reason that we went out and acquired Casetext and then added Materia and the fantastic team from Materia on top of that. So that's a white space opportunity for us around CoCounsel, and that's where we see the entry of new players. We're happy with where we sit in that marketplace. We've got some very aggressive product development plans. And I think most importantly, customers are responding well to CoCounsel and its various offerings. So I hope that clarifies.

That's very helpful. And then I wanted to follow up on the Tax & Accounting business. It looks like the organic constant currency growth decelerated from 11% to 10%. I know these are rounded numbers. But I was curious if you could comment on that. And then can you just talk about your confidence in that accelerating to the 11% to 13% organic growth that you expect in 2026?

Yes, Jason, we do have some fluctuations quarter-by-quarter within the Tax & Accounting professional business. We remain confident in delivering 11% for calendar year 2025. And then for 2026, as a reminder, our guidance is 11% to 13%. We work very closely with Elizabeth Beastrom and her team there. We have very strong confidence in delivering 11% to 13% for 2026. We referenced SafeSend in our prepared remarks, which was the acquisition in January of this year, which is performing incredibly well. We expect that to continue into 2026. Steve mentioned Materia; they're additive, which is the recent acquisitions that we did. So we remain quite confident, Jason, with Tax & Accounting professionals.

Yes. I would just supplement that the end market is a very healthy one. We start our synergy customer conferences down in Florida tomorrow. We're very much looking forward to that and getting excited about getting together with thousands of our customers in person. The Tax & Accounting and Audit spaces remain a very robust end market with a critical need, and that's shortages of talent. And so Jason, as we develop Ready to Review and Ready to Advise and continue to refine those propositions, we think that that is going to meet or even exceed the needs of our customers, and that gives us confidence around the 11% to 13% going forward.

And our next question is going to come from Manav Patnaik from Barclays.

Steve, I appreciate the slide with the data and the moats there because I think we've heard that as well. But to your earlier answer on the competition is more on the workflow side, and that's why you acquired Casetext, et cetera. Can you help us with any sense of sizing of workflow for you guys and the growth rates there? Because obviously, a lot of these legal tech companies are raising a lot of money at high valuations, citing higher growth rates. So just trying to get a sense of your business there.

Yes, Manav, it's a bit unclear at this moment. We likely monitor the same sources you do regarding our competitors' performance and their growth rates, as well as their current ARR levels. What I can share is that CoCounsel is at least matching or exceeding others in terms of size and growth rate. The landscape is competitive, with many new entrants making bold promises. Our differentiation lies in how we integrate our content and expertise. It's not just the content from Westlaw, Practical Law, and Checkpoint on the Tax & Accounting side, but also the knowledge of our 1,500 reference attorneys who train the agents to ensure they produce more accurate and reliable outcomes, all while maintaining high data privacy and protection standards. So, to summarize, we are either matching or outpacing the newer competitors at this early stage, and we are very confident about our medium- to long-term prospects given the strengths we bring to the competition. Mike, do you have anything to add?

That's a good summary.

Yes, that was helpful. I have one question about mergers and acquisitions. We understand the smaller deals you're pursuing will likely continue, but in the past, Steve, you've mentioned possibly exploring larger opportunities. Can you provide an update on the current market conditions? Is it related to valuation or timing? I would appreciate your insights on this.

We are very pleased with the tuck-in acquisitions we have made over the past few years. Each one has contributed positively to the experience we offer in our Big 3 segments. We will keep looking for similar opportunities in these areas. If we consider making a larger acquisition, it will be in sectors where we see significant potential, such as risk, fraud, and compliance, enhancing our CLEAR offerings, as well as in areas like IDT, Indirect Tax, and e-invoicing, where Pagero has been experiencing strong growth that surpasses many market benchmarks. Currently, we believe the assets that interest us are fully valued within their portfolios. The key question is whether we will see a price adjustment that allows us to create value for all our shareholders, not just those exiting. We will continue to monitor this situation closely and maintain our rigorous and disciplined approach.

Steve, in addition to indirect tax, risk, fraud, and compliance, I would just add international. Certainly, we'll be very selective there as we've discussed in the past. But Adrian Fognini, who leads our international business, we are looking at a few potential assets internationally.

Our next question is going to come from George Tong from Goldman Sachs.

You're continuing to target 9% to 11% organic growth in Corporates next year. Can you elaborate on how achievable that growth is without any additional changes to the sales organization or the pace of cross-selling?

Sure, George. Happy to start there. I think we've discussed with you and others in the past that Q4 is our largest quota period for a given year. That applies to Q4 2025 for Corporates. October net sales and bookings were quite encouraging, George. And if we look at our sales pipeline, coverage ratio for both the remainder of Q4 and also Q1 2026, once again, encouraging. Given that those changes have now been solidified and the focus is on execution, the way I think about it, George, a very simple formula. If you have great products and you have strong customer demand and you have a growing TAM, the likelihood of success is pretty damn good if you execute and have the right talent. I think you can check the boxes on each of those variables in the formula that I just mentioned. So that gives me quite confidence. But if you look very tangibly, the October net sales and bookings, secondly, again, the November, December pipeline coverage and then also the Q1 pipeline coverage gives us confidence in achieving that 9% to 11% as we go into 2026, George.

Got it. Very helpful. And then can you talk a bit about your pricing strategy in light of the increasing value that you're providing with your AI products? So do you have plans for accelerated pricing increases, for example, in your multiyear contracts? And how overall do you expect pricing to evolve going forward?

Yes, George, look, it's a great question, and it's one that we are very focused on, and we have some fairly vigorous debates amongst ourselves, particularly between the product folks and the commercial excellence folks and our salespeople. Our principle is price to value. So the extent to which we're driving significant efficiencies in the practice of law or in the practice of audit, tax & accounting, we want to make sure that our products and services are aligned to that. Just a reminder, we do not price on a per seat basis. So to the extent to which work is able to be done by fewer people, we will be a beneficiary of that, not a victim of that, if you like. And so it's a work in progress. I think in the early going, our pricing has proven to be competitive and is driving growth for us. It is profitable growth. I would say so far, so good. But this is one of those ones where we're just constantly looking for signals from the market and refining our approaches.

Yes, George, I would just supplement. As we go into '26, I'm somewhat optimistic that we could have some additional opportunity over the spectrum.

And our next question is going to come from Aravinda Galappatthige from Canaccord Genuity.

I wanted to discuss our current status regarding the rate of innovation and product intensity. We have observed significant activity from Thomson and the industry as a whole. Is it accurate to say that we are nearing a peak in terms of new product launches, with the next phase focusing more on market penetration? I'm trying to connect this to the margin expansion you mentioned. I understand that the last disclosed amount was around $200 million in additional investments aimed at driving growth opportunities. I'm curious if we might be approaching the peak of this trend. Do you have any insights on this?

I'll begin, and Mike might want to add. I closely monitor the product innovation plans from David Wong and Joel Hron, as well as our TR Ventures fund, which is exploring various start-ups and what our partners are doing. I believe that our rate of innovation will accelerate and improve over the next few quarters and into 2026 and 2027, based on past investments and what is coming up. However, the overall landscape is harder to predict. Looking ahead, I anticipate that the innovation rate for highly specialized tools, like ours which focus on specific content and expertise, will continue to enhance. On the other hand, general-purpose tools may see their growth plateau. Our customers are beginning to notice this distinction. This represents a shift in the market, but it's important to recognize that anyone claiming they know exactly what will unfold in this environment might be a bit misguided.

Yes. Aravinda, a couple of points there. Please, please do not correlate our confidence in expanding our margin in 2026 with us investing less. We will invest over $200 million this calendar year '25 in AI, Gen AI. That will continue into 2026. We're able to expand our margins in 2026. One, you're aware of our operating leverage, but we have the opportunity back to the prior questions to automate how we work. I think it was Vince who asked the question illustratively about the AWS reference. So we will continue to invest. And to Steve's point, the rate of innovation and intensity will continue. That $200 million plus will continue into 2026.

And maybe my follow-up for Mike. I mean, on the last call, Mike, I think you talked about sort of your framework for capital allocation and how that potentially leaves $400 million to $500 million for buybacks. Obviously, given the movement in the stock, you've sort of shown the flexibility to step up beyond that. Should we sort of take that forward even going into '26 that notwithstanding that framework, you have the ability and the willingness to sort of step up in terms of your repurchase program?

Yes, I would maintain the framework for mid- to long-term considerations. However, the key point is that we will seize opportunities as they arise, which was evident when we announced the $1 billion NCIB share buyback in mid-August and completed it by the end of October. We regularly discuss our capital strategy and allocation with our Board. In our upcoming Board meeting, we will continue that discussion regarding capital strategy and allocation. While no decisions have been made yet, I still support the framework of $400 million to $500 million. Additionally, I want to emphasize our ability and willingness to increase that amount when necessary. On the topic of capital allocation, I want to remind you that in the January board meeting, we will propose a 10% increase in our common dividend, marking the fifth consecutive year of such an increase.

And our next question is going to come from Maher Yaghi from Scotiabank.

Great. Steve, you have very well articulated why Westlaw has a strong standing to benefit from AI. But can you tackle maybe how you see AI advances affecting your tax business? Do you believe that business has similar defensive capabilities to continue to gain market share as well as you're doing in legal? And the second question is the revenue acceleration you're expecting in 2026 versus 2025. I know it's maybe too early, but can you maybe just let us know which segment of the Big 3 you're expecting to see most of the acceleration coming from?

I'll defer the second question to Mike. On the first one, yes, we're sort of equally excited about the application of AI, Agentic AI, Deep Research to our tax business as we are legal for a couple of reasons. So in terms of the end market, the tax & accounting profession does not need to undertake the same sort of magnitude of change management. So for example, many tax & accounting and audit engagements are not priced on a per-hour basis and not on a billable hour. They are value-based. And so there's not that same business model hurdle to overcome that the legal profession is currently working its way through, firstly. Secondly, there is, as I said before, a pretty acute talent shortage that technology needs to address. So we actually think our tax & accounting customers are even more receptive to AI and technology in terms of improving their outputs and work and enabling, for example, tax professionals to automate the tax return process and move to more value-added advisory services for their clients and the technology enables that. So that's the first part. As we think about applying AI, particularly Agentic AI to our product set, the sort of narrative up until now is that generative AI doesn't do math. Well, our tax calculation engines do the math. And what the agents enable us to do is automate all of the shoulder activities. So the document ingestion, all of the preparation, and then they work with the tax calculation engine, whether it's UltraTax, GoSystem Tax on ONESOURCE. And then they're able to do the follow-up, all of the calculation checks and e-filing. And so that's really what Ready to Advise is. It's the addition of agents to our pre-existing tax calculation engine. And then Ready to Advise is the use of agents to find all of the opportunities for a tax & accounting professional to provide advisory services on more efficient tax strategies for their clients. And so we think that the AI will enable us to expand the role that we play in the success of the tax & accounting profession, enable them to get into more advisory services and achieve growth on that basis, while at the same time, overcoming this talent shortage. Mike, the question on revenue.

Sure. In regards to 2026, just to remind everyone, we do have ranges for 2026 for each of our Big 3 segments. Legal for 2026 is 8% to 9%. Corporates is 9% to 11%. Tax & Accounting, 11% to 13%. Part of your question, Maher, is in regards to which segment would have the largest absolute growth. Tax & Accounting Professional, I believe, will have the largest absolute increase in organic growth rate for 2026 versus 2025. Just to reiterate those reasons; number one, the recent acquisitions of SafeSend, Additive, and Materia will continue to scale for us. Next, Steve has mentioned Ready to Advise and Ready to Review, which are new launches for us. We consistently talk about our Latin America business, Domínio, which we remain quite optimistic about. Over the last 11 years, it's grown 20% CAGR over that time horizon. We expect that to continue. And then lastly, kind of underpinning UltraTax continues to perform well.

And our next question is going to come from Kevin McVeigh from UBS.

Great. I think in the slide deck, you talked about AI-driven innovation, the momentum continuing. On the legal side, I guess, just the timing, like the Agentic launches you did over the summer of '25, are they already starting to kind of permeate the base? Or is that something that continues to scale over the back half of '25 and into '26? I guess I'm just trying to understand the sequencing of maybe things that have already been launched as opposed to things that were launched over the summer.

Yes, Kevin, really good question. Great timing there. For everyone's benefit, we launched those in mid-late August as part of ILTACON. We're already seeing the benefit, and we'll just see more penetration, Kevin, in Q4 and throughout 2026. I would call out each of our general managers within legal professionals that are really driving hard, which is indicative of the 9%. Aaron Rademacher, who is driving the small law firm; Liz Zimick in Mid-Law; Steve with our largest firms. And then we have John Shatwell in Europe, which I think each of these segments, we're seeing progression already with the launches. And with the momentum we have with the launches of CoCounsel Legal, Westlaw Advantage, that will continue. October, we had another great month of sales. With these new product launches, we expect that to continue for the remainder of Q4 and then throughout 2026. So we're already reaping the benefits, Kevin.

That's super helpful. And then just the comments on the Tax & Accounting. Is there any way to think about the experiences of maybe the Big 4 as opposed to maybe the top 10 and maybe mid-market as you think about the go-to-market motion with the enhanced product from a Gen AI perspective?

Yes, Kevin, just to remind everyone, the Big 4 and the next three largest firms, we call it the Global 7, they are included within our Corporates segment, not Tax & Accounting Professionals. But Steve, you may want to comment in regards to the different motion as you think about those G7 versus the remainder of Elizabeth's Tax & Accounting.

Yes. I mean what I would say is there's increasing similarity across the G7, as we call them, relative to the big 4. In other words, firms 5, 6, and 7 are very sophisticated, increasingly global, and investing heavily in technology, and we think we'll be a beneficiary of that going forward. I think though the mix does change a little bit as you get to the sort of top of the ladder there in that they're more likely to take an API from us and build on the top of it versus take the sort of full end-to-end product. So the kinds of work we do in the go-to-market motion is slightly different, Kevin. But the opportunity, I think, is equally weighted across that customer base. And if you go all the way into the smaller firms, which Brian Wilson serves from a go-to-market perspective, he and his teams. They're ready for turnkey solutions that work, that are reliable and that build upon their existing tax calculation engine. And so there's a lot of receptivity at that end as well.

And our next question is going to come from Andrew Steinerman from JPMorgan.

This is Andrew. Most of my questions have been answered, but I would like to revisit the government headwinds for clarification. Am I correct that your updated guidance only takes into account the cancellations observed at the end of the third quarter? Additionally, could you elaborate on whether those cancellations were due to budget cuts in specific departments you work with, or were they a result of layoffs? Any additional details would be appreciated.

Certainly, in regards to our forecast, we always contemplate what has occurred, plus we always look at the upcoming pipeline. So we have contemplated within our forecast any other activity that might transpire in Q4. So we believe that has been reflected already. And then in regards to the reasons for it, there's been a reduction in the actual spending levels in these agencies, which was the main driver.

And our next question is going to come from Stephanie Price from CIBC.

Just a few quick clarifications for me. Mike, I think you've kind of alluded to it for a few times in the call, but can you talk about the drivers that are causing the increase to the fiscal '26 EBITDA guide to 100 basis points versus 50 basis points prior? I think you mentioned some efficiencies, but anything else you wanted to add on there?

I would say two primary drivers. One is the operating leverage at roughly 7%, 7.5%. We generate about 110 basis points of natural operating leverage, which is sustained in our business. The second key factor is our focus on transforming and automating how we work. So if you take those two, that would be more than 100 basis points, but leads to a third key factor, which relates to a question earlier, is we're continuing to make investments, and we'll continue to make investments wherever we see the returns are sufficient there. But the two key drivers of margin expansion, operating leverage, and then our internal initiative to transform and automate how we work.

Perfect. And then for the Legal segment, organic growth accelerating quarter-over-quarter to 9%. I think in the prior question, you mentioned some new product launches. Just curious if there was anything else you wanted to call out there in terms of shifts in demand or adoption rates within Legal.

I think the new product launches certainly help us significantly there. Retention rates continue to be very good within that business. Pricing is relatively stable there. Certainly, Stephanie, we always add talent as part of our operating mechanism. So I think those are the key drivers for us. Steve, you may want to add...

The only thing I'd add is way back at our Investor Day a couple of years ago, where we started to talk about this AI journey, we did, at that time, speculate that the TAM in Legal would grow, and it would grow on a sustained basis. I think we're starting to see that. What we're starting to see is law firms wrestle with the idea of spending more on technology and potentially less on real estate and still trying to sort of work their way through the headcount implications. I think it's too early to sort of call that one way or another. But we're starting to see that TAM expand. And we think that that, that's going to be a multiyear phenomenon and one that we plan to have the products and the propositions to fully benefit from.

And our next question is going to come from Doug Arthur from Huber Research.

Yes. I think most things have been covered. Steve, you mentioned the acute talent shortage issues in some of the big accounting firms. Is there a similar narrative in legal or not so much?

Not so much, Doug. As someone who started my career at PW, like Mike, I can say that kids today are not as attracted to the profession as we were. Whether it's the large accounting firms, midsize firms, or even smaller ones, they are struggling to recruit entry-level talent and to guide them through the necessary apprenticeship process. This is a significant problem that has been growing for several years. The number of individuals qualifying as CPAs has decreased dramatically in recent times. Meanwhile, the demand for audits is increasing, the complexity of audits is rising, and there are more tax returns with greater complexity. The need for advice from tax and accounting professionals for small, medium, and large businesses is intensifying. The demand is strong, but the supply of talent is the issue. Technology has an exciting and vital role to play here, which is why we are investing heavily to meet or exceed those demands.

And our next question is going to come from Toni Kaplan from Morgan Stanley.

Your large competitor in legal has talked about one of the benefits of its partnership with Harvey is increasing distribution. I was hoping you could talk about, Steve, how you're thinking about partnerships right now. You have the content, you have the AI capabilities. So it doesn't seem like you need to partner with others. But is there an advantage to doing that because of increasing distribution? Or is there a disadvantage of going that route?

Toni, I won't comment on their approach. But what I will say is that we're very confident in our position of having CoCounsel for Legal, which is now fully integrated with our content and editorial expertise. So we don't see the need for partnerships, the likes of which one of our competitors has entered into or two of our competitors have entered into together. Where we are partnering is where there are point solutions, AI-driven point solutions, for example, in sort of the debt capital markets and its application to the legal profession or in very, very specific area of the law, where we think an innovative team has developed a solution that can work in with CoCounsel. So we're keen to explore that ecosystem. But in terms of distribution, we obviously have the leading distribution in the industry at the moment. So we don't see a need there. But thanks for the question, Toni.

All right. I think that brings us to the end of our time. So thanks, everybody. Have a good day.

Thank you.

Thank you.

And this concludes today's call. We appreciate your participation. You may now disconnect.