BE Semiconductor Industries N.V. (BESI) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Good morning, good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Basie's quarterly conference call and audio webcast to discuss the company's 2026, second quarter, and first half-year results. You can register for the conference call or log in to the audio webcast via Basie's website, www.basie.com. Joining us today are Mr. Richard Tickman, Chief Executive Officer, and Mrs. Andrea Kopp, Senior Vice President of Finance. Currently, all participants are in a listen-only mode, and later we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, this conference is being recorded and cannot be reproduced, in whole or in part, without written permission from the company. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Richard Flickman.

Thank you.

Thank you all for joining the call today. I'd like to remind everyone that on today's call, management will be making forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect Basie's current views and assumptions regarding future events, many of which are by nature inherently uncertain and beyond Basie's control. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements due to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to factors that are discussed in the company's most recent periodic and current reports filed with the AFM. Such forward-looking statements, including guidance provided during today's call, speak only as of this date. Bayesian does not intend to update them in light of new information or future developments, nor does Bayesian undertake any obligation to update the forward-looking statements. For today's call, we'd like to review the key highlights of our second quarter, the six months ended June 30, 2026, and update you on the market, our strategy, and the outlook. First, some overall thoughts on the second quarter and first half-26. BASI reported strong second quarter and first half-year-26 results as favourable order momentum continued for both our traditional and wafer-level assembly systems. Revenue of Euros 249.9 million increased by 68.7% and 35.2% versus the second quarter last year and Q1-2026, respectively. Growth versus the second quarter last year was primarily due to increased AI spending for Photomics, Data Center, and hybrid applications, as well as increased demand for mobile applications. Additional hybrid orders were received in the second quarter this year from two repeat customers and one new hyperscaler customer. Similarly, orders of Euros 292.9 million rose by 128.8% versus the second quarter last year and 8.6% versus the first quarter of this year. Of note, BASIC's orders for the last 12 months increased to a record of Euros 987.6 million. Q2 net income of 89 million Euros increased by 177.3% versus the second quarter last year and 72.5% versus Q1 26 as gross margins improved and operating expense growth was limited despite increased spending for development and customer support activities. Similarly, net margins increased to 35.6% versus 21.6% in the second quarter last year. For the first half year, Basics' revenue amounted to 434.7 million euros and net income of 140.6 million euros increased by 48.8% and 121.1% respectively versus the first half of 25, primarily due to significantly expanded AI infrastructure spending. a modest recovery in traditional mobile and industrial markets and disciplined overhead management. Similarly, net margins increased from 21.7% in the first half of 25 to 32.3% in the first half of 26 aided by improved gross margins and significant operating leverage in our business model as baseline operating expenses reduced from 30% of revenue in Q2 last year to 18.9% in Q2 26. H1 orders rose to euros 562.6 million, an increase of 312.7 million euros or 116.5% versus the first half of last year due to broad-based growth across all BASI end-user markets and products. Order growth was strong for photonics and data center applications and hybrid bonding capacity expansion for both current and next generation AI devices. We also received new orders for AI power management applications in the second quarter this year for multiple customers. Overall, we estimate that system orders for AI applications rose to approximately 60% in the first half of this year versus approximately 50% in the first half of 2025 last year In addition, we saw renewed growth for high-end smartphone applications in the first half of this year versus cyclical lows reached in 2025 due primarily to incremental capacity purchases and new product introductions planned for 2026. Our net cash position at the end of the second quarter 26 increased by 58.8% versus March 31st of this year to reach 164 million euros. Growth was primarily due to the conversion into equity of basis 175 million euros of convertible notes due 2029 and strong cash flow from operations which offset the payment of 125.4 million euros for the annual dividend paid out in the second quarter of this year. Next I'd like to discuss the current market environment and an update on our strategy. Overall we see favorable industry conditions this year due to the ongoing AI infrastructure build, capacity shortages, particularly in memory and in co-ops, co-ops-like and renewed unit growth for both AI and traditional mainstream end markets. Similarly, we see ongoing improvement in assembly equipment market conditions as the impact of AI spending and recovery in traditional mobile industrial applications becomes more apparent. The latest Tech Insights forecast calls for 53% market growth between 2025 and 2028. We expect to significantly exceed such projected growth rates given our leadership position in 2.5D and 3D advanced packaging and wafer level assembly. We continue to execute well on our strategic plan presented last year for both revenue and cost initiatives. Orders have already exceeded peak levels from the last cycle and disciplined expense management has enhanced our profit potential. We are adjusting our operating model, supply chain and service support activities accordingly. Progress also continued on our wafer level assembly agenda this year. hybrid bonding customers' adoption increased from 15 a year and 25 to 21 at the end of Q2 26. Use cases increased for logic, memory, co-package updates and consumer applications and orders increased material versus the first half of 25, as significant new capacity was added. In addition, there were multiple new product announcements made this year related to data center and consumer CPU applications utilizing hybrid bonding. Progress also was made on our TC Next agenda with increased revenue and customer adoption versus the first half of last year. Now a few words about our guidance. We see all the momentum continuing in the third quarter of this year due to ongoing demand strength for current and future AI applications as well as improvement in BASY's traditional mainstream and user markets. Customers indicate that we are in a multi-year AI complex cycle further supported by increased demand for agentic AI applications which are driving increased demand for data center CPUs and many of our advanced packaging systems. BASI's strategy is currently focused on expanding our opportunities and wafer level assembly, increasing our penetration of COOS, COPOS, and Photonics markets and ramping our supply chain and service support capabilities in alignment with market conditions. Based on our backlog and feedback from customers, we anticipate the basis third quarter 26 revenue will increase by 10% to 15% versus the second quarter of this year. In addition, gross margins are anticipated to decrease to a range between 63% and 65% due to a less favorable product mix than we had in the second quarter of 26. Operating expenses are anticipated to be flat to up 5% due primarily to increase development spending. That ends my prepared remarks. I would like to open the call for questions. Operator.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are now ready to take your questions. We kindly request that you limit your questions to one question and a follow-up. Our first question comes from PJ. from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon.

I hope you're well. Just wanted to ask you a quick question on the Q4 Bookings Outlook, Richard. If you could tell us a little bit more about the contribution to your confidence about the strength of that auto-intake momentum. Is that also driven by memory? And if you could give us an update on your thoughts on the adoption for HBM4E, that would be great.

Excellent, DDA.

By the way, you asked Q4, but let me focus on Q3 first. Sorry, I meant Q3. I meant Q3, sorry. No problem. As we indicated, we see continued momentum for the business for the second quarter. But your question is very important from the, let's say, aspect of how that will develop for the different applications. And we certainly expect in the third quarter continued orders for hybrid bonding. And as we have said on the previous quarter calls, whether that was February or also end of April, we're in a very interesting, exciting moment in time for the adoption of hybrid bonding for HBM applications, whether that is HBM4E or even HBM3. As we speak, evaluations are going on at one of the major, one of the three memory companies in our industry. Also, we've indicated that another one is starting the evaluation currently. So it will be exciting to see the outcome in the third quarter, but also into the fourth quarter, how much and which application then we'll be using the hybrid bonding technology. There's a lot of, let's say, views of how this will develop in the industry currently. Some are forcing that it may delay, others are forcing that it is imminent. So in that exciting landscape, DESI with its hybrid ponding technology, together with applied materials in automated line concepts, is at the forefront of this technology being used in the memory. As we indicated in the prepared notes, we see continued adoption in the logic arena. We've added three more customers this quarter, one being a hyperscater that is for the use of the future glasses. but there are many other applications which are developed and in test applications currently using this hybrid technology so broadening the applications is a fact to 21 customers so far so anyway a bit longer answer to your question it will be very exciting to see how the third quarter will pan out

Okay, very clear, Richard. And for my follow-up, I wanted to ask you a little bit about how you're thinking about mobile. So, one, you said that we have seen or you have seen some improvement in the mobile business from a very depressed level. As we move into the second half, and in particular Q4 and Q1, normally the order intake is dominated by the refresh of high-end smartphones. So, any thoughts around that? and also related to high-end smartphones. What are your thoughts on the adoption of hybrid bonding in high-end smartphones over the course of 27 and 28?

First of all, we made the comment because we have received significantly more orders so far this year compared to last year. As we called last year, sort of a cyclical trough. And that is always driven by new features or updated features like for instance new cameras but also other components in those high-end smartphones are in a way cyclical because of new designs in next generations and as we indicated we have enjoyed a significant improvement in orders in that front. At the same time, we mentioned three months ago that we saw the first adoption of hybrid bonding, hybrid bonded device, the M5, into high-end laptops, and they should find a way at some point into the high-end smartphones. Not yet we have seen those orders, But if you look at simply the plan for capacity expansion in Taiwan, as we have started now to fill the AP7 with the first systems, which is publicly informed to the world, We should see in the next quarters How that capacity is also expanded for other applications Than for logic devices so far In the high-end compute So data centers, that was the first

So that's well on track Okay, perfect And maybe my last question, you know, relates to the HBM, again, adoption. So, you know, the JDEC body has sort of loosened up the thickness requirement for HBM4E. And so I just wondered whether you think that has got any impact on the adoption curve of hybrid bonding in HBM4, 4E, or 5, because there seems to be a lot of confusion around that in the market.

Well, we saw the first increase now over two years ago, which in a way shocked the market, saying, well, we don't need hybrid bonding anymore. But we have seen the contrary in development. And as just explained, the year 26, all three are preparing to adopt at some point hybrid bonding for the very simple reason that the performance of the device is significantly better, we are told, and at the same time it produces far less heat. Many numbers are publicly shared by some of the memory producers which simply indicate whether you allow an increase in height in stacking that does not improve the performance or the heat characteristics. So the technology moves on. One of the reasons we hear is simply because there's a huge shortage in the memory market as we speak, and allowing a higher end, let's say, package height is simply offering the industry more devices, albeit at performance levels, which are different from that using a hybrid bonding solution. So, the amount of development is only increasing, and the end markets simply require the best solutions for performance and other characteristics like heat. So, again, my message is that the height does not change that characteristic.

Yeah, perfect idea. Thank you so much, Richard. Thanks, TJ.

The next question comes from Charles Sheep from Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks for taking my question.

Richard, the first thing I want to start is on HBM qualification now, all top three HBM customers have your tools. And I think you mentioned a little bit, but can you kind of talk through hopefully one by one that where the qualification status is and what are maybe some of the major hurdles you're seeing in terms of getting hybrid funding qualified at each one of the customers? And maybe I'll have a couple more questions afterwards.

The major hurdles are simply cost and yield. If you look at any technology in this industry, but also other industries, any major change requires a qualification, and that always starts with yield issues. You have material issues. You have different processes. So if you look at the entire production process of such a device, bonding is one step in that. Preparation is very critical. So all these processes need to be simply qualified. At the same time, because the process is more advanced in terms of accuracy, and also because of the nature of the process that all requires and if you take simply as a reference how long it took for Taiwan, the major customer, to have the logic application up and running. It took us over three years and finally it has met those yield and cost challenges and is only expanding from here. The same in the U.S. After a long time of qualification at the major U.S. Logic customer, we are finally in the stage that this is becoming a mainstream application. And that qualification process is identical with the two Korean customers, also with the U.S. customer. So we're at the very beginning of this technology moving from the development stage, proving all of its performance characteristics in every way, defining the material specs, etc. And we are step by step coming closer to a mainstream market application. So between development and operations. Development is always completely different in terms of organization and companies as compared to operations. Operations are only interested in throughput, in yield, and ultimately the cost of the device. So, as we have indicated in previous quarter updates, and also to Capital Markets Day, or yesterday we're making significant progress at all three one is currently driving the bus the fastest and we all know that who is also announcing that publicly so we will shortly find out do we pass the test for full production at this moment or does it take a bit more time The other two also have stepped up Simply their engagement and testing And finding mainstream anti-applications And so in the second half of this year It will become more clear Will there be inroads into HVM4E Or even HVM3 Because there are different anti-applications Which require a better performance and especially less heat. So all those developments are going on currently, and that's the landscape.

Thank you. I don't see your question.

Yes, very clear. I have a follow-up on the hydro-bonding orders you got in the past quarter. Sounds like it's all logic applications, two repeat customers, one hyperscaler. Can you provide a little bit more context, especially around the hyperscaler order? Because it's interesting because we are not expecting a hyperscaler actually going to buy tools. Can you tell us what is this all about?

Well, what we know, and it's not always clear, There's a lot of development, as we have indicated on the longer-term picture, on applications which are in, let's say, wearable products, glasses for instance. It may well be for that application, but that's not unique. There are many customers or many several in that arena we know and all of us know very well that the next step in wearables is those glasses. It can also be for other applications but then as you said logic is expanding if you may call it logic in many ways also co-package optics but that's not the hyperscaler but co-package optics is an application which we expect to grow significantly in the years to come and you need the hybrid bonding technology to connect that into the device and there are other chiplet architecture devices which are also developed using hybrid technology.

Thanks, maybe last question from me, Richard, your Q3 guidance, I found this is a pretty unusual from a seasonality perspective. The seasonality we're familiar with the best years, the Q3 you're down, it can be 10 to 25 in some like a downturn years, and Q4 maybe minus 5% sequential. But you're now guiding Q3 up 10 to 15, a bit unusual from a seasonality perspective. And I think you mentioned about order momentum. You mentioned about maybe even some recovery in the mainstream part of the market. Do you see maybe looking out a little bit further into Q4 or maybe a little bit beyond? And is this, I mean, above the seasonal pattern lasting a little longer this year? And what do you see, especially in the mainstream part of the market?

Thank you. Oh, excellent. Well, if you, we have this lovely slide in the deck going back to 2006, where you see the quarterly development in the past two decades. And you're absolutely right. were usually first half year loaded, as it is called. But that was always because of consumer and market characteristics. So if you take two years, three years ago, the major part was always communication devices, high-end smartphones. In the last two years, that has changed into compute AI data center applications. So that has a different characteristic in terms of seasonality as we were used to. That is one. The second one is the pattern as discussed in expanding hybrid technology capacity in the world, both in logic and also, if all goes well, in certain early capacity for HBM. So that may well change the order pattern. But to go with a revenue pattern, and that's nicely depicted in that slide, usually we have in a strong year a higher revenue in Q3 than in Q2. So usually then the orders come down, but as we indicated, we have continued order momentum, but with a different mix. So that's in a, let's say, in a way you can understand that guidance.

Thanks. That would be all for me. Thank you.

Thanks, Charles.

Ladies and gentlemen, we kindly remind you to limit your questions to one question and a follow-up. The following question comes from Martin Marzon-Karriyan from OtoBHF. Please go ahead.

Hi, Martin.

It seems Martin might have some trouble. I suggest you signal County 5 again. We'll move on to the following question. This is from Martin Lamplej from D&D Paribas. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe coming back to the hyperbonding orders in the corner. In the first release, you mentioned hyperbonding orders from two repeat customers. And first of all, can you disclose if these repeat orders were for CPO, logic, memory, or even R&D application? And what is your view on the order cadence here from your big Taiwanese customer? There was some news that this customer may actually accelerate cohorts in favor of SOIC. I'm just wondering if you see potentially this customer kind of slowing down order momentum in the short term here. That's the first question.

Well, to start with the last comment, we don't see that currently. We only see continued, let's say, efforts and pressure on us to expand the capacity. So, but there's many, as we said earlier, there are many views shared by different sources. but we don't see any so-down in that. On the orders received from the three customers, as I answered the earlier question, the hyperscaler is probably for wearables. The other two are, one is related to co-package optics and the other one is simply log-shift.

No, that makes sense. And then the applications on IDMs, I mean, IDM-related orders were up to 30 million, that is Q1. Can you just disclose, was that hybrid bombing, or was that maybe the mainstream kind of AI power-related application that you were talking about in the press release?

The mainstream, that was not hybrid-related. It was very much our other products, Flipchip, also MMA. And also conventional, so very strong orders, as we explained in the press release, but also in the comments across the board. The only part which is still not very much improving is automotive.

Okay, interesting. And the power segment, is there some new segment for you here that you would potentially see increasing for the next couple of quarters as you saw the 800 volt architectures ramp up?

Yeah, although power is of course for us a long time part of our business, but we see increased and also a lot of development in applications which have to do with data center, compute, modules. and that is, let's say, becoming a much stronger business segment compared to a year and two years ago. It's a bit in line with the increase overall demand for data center compute.

The following question comes from Sandeep Deshpande from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for letting me on. Richard, I have two questions on your products. Firstly, I believe that you have broken into the Covas market, and how do you see that, has that been part of the orders in Q2, both in terms of Covas L, as well as the original Covas at some of the ODM, or rather the contract manufacturers who are doing Covas now? so how do you see that having trended in terms of the orders or is this something which is going to happen in terms of your order book in future quarters no no that's already a significant part of the orders and we always call that cause like and that is that already started you can say in Q4 Q1 Q2 and

should continue to expand. Understood.

And then what about TC next? I mean, how do you see TC next? I mean, is this already a part of the order book or this is still being tested by the clients that have bought the early tools and that this will ramp up later in the year or next year?

As we commented, the customer base is expanding, the amount of qualifications is significant, the industry is moving to applications below 20 micron bump pad pitch, and as you know, our system is designed for that segment, so between 10 and 20, also fluxless, and you see increasing engagement in qualifications but also systems ordered single systems not yet major volume there's one who has several but that is early days with ever more clear future demand and in terms of timing or when do you expect the volume ramp here as well as what products are you looking at the volume ramp like you talked about on a hybrid bonding where your demand is coming from combination logic it's in first instance it's very um yeah similar to hybrid so the the critical thing about bumpet pitches below 10 micron to do that with a reflow process and you would also like to do that with fluxless that is the most intended application but already pretty soon it also found its way into the development of HBM with smaller geometries and that are both drivers where this system is very much suited and also offering superior cost of ownership results.

Thank you, Richard.

The following question comes from Nabil Aziz from Rothschild & Co. Redburn. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, Richard. Thanks for taking the question. I was just thinking about the cadence of hybrid bondage shipments through 2026. I was just thinking, should we expect half-on-half increase in hybrid bonding installations, particularly with AP7 investments ramping?

That's a good question.

If all goes according to plan, that may well happen in that sequence. As we know, the, let's say, published total capacity should be roughly double that of AP6. In AP6, there are about 60 boomers, so that's still some way to go to double that. That's always done in incremental steps. We explained the first round orders received in Q1. There may be another round in the second half, we don't know, with a lead time of about six months.

That then explains when it will become revenue.

And then just as a follow-up on Copos, could you talk about what the move to panel-level packaging could mean for the Bezzi business and what the kind of RAM profile you're expecting for Copos over the next few years? Thank you.

Well, it's becoming ever more clear that the industry is selecting a panel size 310 by 310. There are also larger panel sizes indicated 510 by 515 But as we know, Taiwan has selected 310 by 310 Which also makes a lot of sense compared to a wafer size currently Our systems are mostly prepared for panel size 310 by 310 Also we have orders to that extent same with packaging by the way so the industry is moving into that direction and not for all applications for certain applications

so that is definitely part of our let's say market going forward Thank you Richard The following question comes from Martin Marazon from AutoBHF Please go ahead I was on mute Thank you for taking my question.

Yeah, I'm sorry about that earlier.

I had some problem with my phone. So, in the press release, I wanted to understand better a statement. When you talk about increasing penetration of co-wows and co-paws, how should we understand it? Are you talking more about sleep-chip bundling opportunities or even about TCD there?

And also hybrid. Don't forget that you may well see certain modules assembled in a panel format. So, depending upon the size, you can have a certain amount, and you would need those three technologies to build those devices.

And in the Invested Day material, you see some examples of that.

And the most easy way to understand is if you have a round format, you lose corners. If you have a square panel format, you use also those corners. And that increases the efficiency and in the end reduces the cost of ownership.

Okay, that's all. And my second question is on TCB because you know you had this quite large order last year in memory. We didn't see really repeat orders since then. I wanted to understand what you're understanding behind this. Do you think it's because the customer could educate with hybrid bending or is there another reason?

No, the reason is quite simple. Every customer is preparing for a next step in miniaturization of chip design. So that always takes time. The development of the next generation can be two years, three years, four years. and in order to be fully prepared, that's how customers buy systems initially. I can explain in many details for many other customers how that unfolds year after year after year and the timing is often dependent on many other factors. end market factors? Will they use the current technology for a next round? Can they stretch that or do they need to change to smaller geometries? That's always a trade-off. So that's how you should see that development. But it's very important to be the process of reference at an initial stage. then if you do it well you can have the largest opportunity once it becomes mainstream Thank you Thanks for that The following question comes from Mark Hesseling from Pying Please go ahead Thank you My first question is on the AI power management which you already addressed a bit I told you whenever you start

calling elements out in the press release it typically was the start of a pretty strong period. I think you discussed this already a bit at the Investor Day. Maybe a bit more detail. Did you really make now a first real inroads with more significant volume than years before with one client? Are there more clients to follow? How do you see this ramp pattern into the next few quarters?

Well, as you rightfully concluded, we only mention when we feel with high certainty that that could be a significant mainstream contribution to the total. So, yes, there are more customers. As I explained earlier, it's part of the total offering to this data center module and market. And power is a very critical part always. And so that is the background of that statement. We don't mention specific customers, but I can say that it's more than only one customer. It's broader. So that like with Photonics, the pluggables, or with the OS on substrate from Colos, same like Chitbone Wafer, same story, that all is part of the roadmap of 2.5D and that gives us a major opportunity same like photonics and co-package optics they're all focused on specific and markets which are mainstream currently or in the future

like co-package optics expectation is very high for that market in going into the future um so anyway you have to see that comment in in in in that context yeah thanks and second question is also coming back on an earlier answer it's only uh seasonality i think you already explained uh but now the biggest right is not the communication anymore but but and more the data which has a different seasonality but then in the communication part is there still the usual seasonality and the reason I'm asking I also read

some stories that maybe the cadence of introductions by Apple might be also an introduction in the first half next year that maybe therefore also the communication is a bit more split out or is that something you well we've heard that many times in the past the the let's say it all depends on judgment of end markets and consumer markets are very difficult in that sense so we also only hear at the final moment usually January early February what the decision is of the content change in the next generation to be launched in September time frame sometimes you hear that that may change to spring time but we have not seen that but for us it doesn't make much difference other than planning of production capacity so the typical machines used for let's say high end smartphones is of course flip chip MMA for multimodal attached cameras is one of the key end products and you can expect a change in those cameras which is also indicated then you have the whole 5D but also the power all the critical components and they all let's say suppliers in the supply chain for those end products. We have not seen a change in structure yet. We've heard that, yes, but we haven't seen it yet. So the round we are now, let's say, emphasizing is a clear round which has to do with a generation which will be introduced in September, October. and so orders for that we have received in first quarter in early part of the second quarter and maybe if that all is successful in adoption in the world you may see additional orders in the third quarter so that's typically the pattern very clear, thanks

I hope that helps Final question comes from Robert Sanders from Big2Bank. Please go ahead.

Yeah, hi, Richard. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe if we could just take a step back and talk a bit about the potential for overcapacity building up. I guess in particular 2.5D, what worries you more about what you see today in terms of the potential for overcapacity building up? Is it the co-op look-alikes or is it China? You've been through many cycles, so I'd be interested to sort of get a sense of what you see and then have a follow-up.

Well, first of all, thanks for this question. If you look at the previous cycles in our industry, typically an up cycle lasts six quarters, maybe eight, and then you are bound to have an overcapacity. As soon as you hear new fabs being built, new assembly sites, advanced packaging being built and by different major customers and then also the whole subcontractor universe expanding capacities, you don't will see at some point an overcapacity. So what we see in the market clearly reflects the statistical analysis of what has gone on in many cycles. There are many always other profits who are saying, You know, this time it's different. It will last another super cycle, three years at the minimum, because of the overwhelming demand. We've also heard that before. So it's a very interesting question. But then if you look at VASI, we can accelerate, decelerate, look at our margins, our ramps and also DRAMs with increasing margins in this cyclical world and it remains cyclical you simply have to follow the demand cycles of the leader and customers so are we heading into an overcapacity time will tell we adjust our operations our supply chains long lead items three times a week simply following exactly the demand patterns of those customers as said. We are suppliers to an industry, to an industry which today has major drivers and of course AI is a game changer in many ways. Will that follow a continued growth path? Nobody knows. So I'm sorry, Rob, I can't give you a better answer.

But do you think that this cycle is potentially more dangerous just because the OST, you know, they make 18% gross margin, they can make 40% in co-op lookalikes, doesn't that make it a little bit more dangerous or do you feel that's always the case that there's some attractive high margin market that they can go after?

The name of the game. So any high margins is bound to result. Well, take the memory market right now. Who would have thought two years ago that you would ever enter the memory market into a world with margins which we have right now? So that's the danger in this industry. But as a supplier, you simply have to prepare, you have to enjoy the demand as soon as it is offered. And that's what we do. And then if the tide goes out, simply be able to adjust your cost.

Got it. And just one housekeeping question. I don't know if this was answered earlier, and I apologize if it was, but did you say how many hybrid bonding units were shipped in Q2 and how many booking numbers you took in units for Q2? Just out of interest, if you're willing to say, thanks.

No, we haven't disclosed units. We did disclose a number of customers. We're now over 20, 21 customers, and we updated in detail the progress in HBM adoption with a very clear message that it will be very interesting in the course of this quarter and also the fourth quarter how much and which application that will use hybrid bonding.

Thanks a lot, Richard. Have a good summer.

Thank you, Rob.

Ladies and gentlemen. I will now hand the word over to Mr. Richard Blinkman for the closing remarks.

Thank you all for listening in, and in case you have additional questions, don't hesitate to contact us. Thank you again.