IP GROUP PLC (IPO) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Good morning ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the IP Group PLC half year results investor presentation. Questions are encouraged they can be submitted at any time via the Q&A tab that's just situated on the right hand corner of your screen. Please just simply type in your questions and press send. The company may not be in a position to answer every question it receives during the meeting itself however the company can review all questions submitted today and we'll publish our responses where it's appropriate to do so. Before we begin as usual we would just like to submit the following poll and if you'd give that your kind attention I'm sure the company would be most grateful. And I'd now like to hand you over to CEO Greg Smith. Greg, good morning, sir.

Good morning, Jake. Thank you very much. And welcome everyone to IP Group's 2026 half-year results presentation. And thanks very much to all the InvestorMeet company team and Mark for hosting today's session. Much appreciated as always. For those who don't know me, I'm Greg Smith. I'm the Chief Executive of IP Group. With me today is David Baines, our Chief Financial and Operating Officer. We've deliberately tried to keep today's presentation a bit shorter and more focused. It's the half year after all, so I will cover the half year highlights and progress across the portfolio and our strategic priorities. I'll get DB to take you through the financials before I return to summarise, and then, of course, there will be time for questions. And I would say the headline for today's results is that we have carried the momentum that we had from 2025 into 2026 with further NAV per share growth, strong cash realisations, and, as I hope we will demonstrate, broad-based portfolio progress. As usual, the disclaimer is here. Please note these sort of important disclaimers, particularly the bit about forward-looking statements. This presentation will be up on the investor relations section of our website for review post the call. so in terms of what we'll cover today um short four short sections uh the half year overview portfolio progress um i think particularly the future value opportunity within that then financial results and then a brief summary so please post questions through the platform as we go as jake said we'll then group them by theme and answer as many as we can and we'll do that clearly and directly so turning first to what we delivered for shareholders in the first half and before we do that i just wanted to note that this year marks ip group's 25th anniversary and over that period we've invested over one and a half billion pounds we've helped to form and support more than 600 companies and those companies have created more than 15 000 jobs that track record matters because science investing in our view rewards experience specialist judgment and also long-term relationships from a shareholder point of view and also gives this a large and increasingly mature portfolio from which future value and cash realizations can emerge but today is principally about the delivery in the first half and the little period afterwards so let's move straight into the first half results so the group made disciplined and tangible progress in the first half nav per share increased by about three percent to 114 pence taking net asset value above a billion since the period end nav for share has actually increased further to approximately 117 pence a share as at 11th September last Friday. We generated 69 million of cash proceeds in the six months which was slightly more actually than the whole of full year 25. A further 17 million since June takes our year-to-date proceeds to the mid 80 millions. Portfolio companies raised over half a billion of third-party capital, and we contributed about 5% of this. So this is strong external evidence that other investors are prepared to commit substantial capital to companies as they progress. Now, the largest fair value driver in the period was the further de-risking of Pfizer's obesity programs. That increased the value of our royalty interest by 27 million to just over 150 million, and we ended the period with a healthy cash balance of 239 million gross. So the message is not that one asset performed well. Nav growth, cash realizations, external funding and operational milestones all generally moved forward together. Now before going into the detail behind that in the portfolio, I just want to briefly acknowledge the possible offer process during the summer I would say as we put in our R&S release the board sought to engage constructively with Railpen and its partners and we remain very grateful for their effort and the constructive engagement of all of the shareholders who we spoke to during that period as you will have seen the process did not result in an acceptable proposal and so our focus as a management team and a board is firmly on delivering the substantial value that we see in the group. On that note, let's turn to Pfizer. So, at the full year, I spent a bit of time explaining why that Pfizer obesity royalty interest had become such a significant asset for IP group and our shareholders. The first half has added further evidence to that and also reduced development risk. During the period, Pfizer released positive clinical data for the lead program beribenetide showing competitive weight loss efficacy alongside favorable tolerability and supporting the potential for a monthly maintenance regimen. The beribenetide and amylin combination also advanced into phase 2b and that was the primary driver of the 27 million uplift that I mentioned. Now this is an increasingly competitive market so differentiation matters. I think the potential combination of competitive efficacy, favourable tolerability, and this sort of monthly maintenance profile remains one of the main reasons that Pfizer believes this programme can be highly differentiated in that increasingly competitive market. And also to reiterate, Pfizer's committed substantial resource to this, it is progressing 10 phase three studies this year and launches targeted in 2028 so as we have said in previous notes there remains clinical regulatory and commercial risk and as a result our valuation is based around a probability weighted method and is discounted but the progress in the half strengthens both the quality and the breadth of our exposure to a market that is externally forecast at around sort of 100 billion to 150 billion or thereabouts annually by 2030. So hopefully give you a little bit more colour. This slide shows the route to market across the programmes where we've got economic exposure. And as I mentioned, the most advanced of the assets at the top there is beribenetide. Two phase three studies are expected to reach primary completion in October 2027 and that supports a potential first approval in 2028. There's also a monthly dosing study and seven further phase 3 studies that could provide potential to broaden the label and therefore the commercial opportunity. Worth noting that just yesterday at a conference Pfizer also indicated that recruitment across essentially all of the berivenetide phase three studies is now close to completion. From our point of view, from your point of view as shareholders, that's very encouraging because patient recruitment is often the biggest factor in determining when studies read out and complete, and so it supports good confidence in the current program timetable. As I mentioned, the berivenetide and amylin combination is now in phase two B, so you can see that there, and that's got primary completion currently expected in April 27. We also have exposure to an amylin monotherapy and some earlier oral and next-gen programs and there's a couple as Dave will come on to explain a couple of phase one assets that are not currently attributed value in our model. So I think the important takeaway from this for shareholders is that this isn't exposure to a single binary program it extends across the lead program which is an injectable and some combination therapies and the potential for less frequent dosing and a number of these earlier stage programs so that gives us several possible routes to value as Pfizer develops the franchise and I think this this point on the carrying value I think the 150 million we've got it in at this definitely doesn't reflect Pfizer's commercial ambition and it's based on these risk adjusted probabilities and so DB will take you through those assumptions in a little bit more detail later today. In terms of our investment thesis our default is to hold the asset and receive the royalties and they're anticipated to begin in 2028 if the development and launch proceed to the plan that is set out here. This is highly consistent with the venture model. A small number of exceptional outcomes can drive a very disproportionate share of returns. And this asset, we believe, gives shareholders direct exposure to that potential. That being said, having a default path definitely doesn't mean that we stop exploring ways to accelerate value creation for shareholders so as the program matures and de-risks over this period we would expect the range of strategic options available to us to broaden out and we will continue to assess these carefully through the lens of long-term shareholder value and of course we remain open to exceptional opportunities should they arise on Oxford Nanoport they made, I would say, encouraging progress in the half and has performed strongly since the period end from a share price point of view. As you can see from the slide, and many of you would have tracked this directly, revenue was at 117 million, which is about a 12% growth at constant currency. A big, big thing for us was the fact that gross margin increased by 400 basis points to 62%. But I think even more important, and I think this was the bit that came out particularly in the half-year results more than the trading statement, was the adjusted EBITDA loss more than halving to just over 22 million. I think one of the key developments has been the strengthening of the leadership team. Francis joined as CEO in March and the company has also added a number of senior hires in in areas of key capabilities as it prepares for its next phase of commercial growth and I think under that leadership team it feels to us that there is a more focused customer-led growth strategy. The company has spoken about narrowing down the 47 areas in which its technology could compete to the 18 that it considers most attractive and interestingly management's own analysis indicates that around 40 to 45 percent of revenue generated over the last three years already comes from those priority markets. So the existing revenues therefore provide something of a strong foundation for that strategy and give the company a credible base from which to expand. And the opportunity available, which is completely set out and within their materials, gives very substantial room for expansion. So I think we see this as very much a refinement of focus rather than a wholesale change of direction and that gives us confidence in the team's ability to execute that point on profitability or the progress towards profitability that has been absolutely central to our investment thesis and i think the results were ahead of where the market appeared to be and the company remains on track for that ebit break even in in full year 27 and positive free cash flow in 2028 and the other point of note is the cross licensing agreement with a global diagnostics company that brings 35 million dollars of committed revenue over the next couple of years but importantly ongoing royalties which we believe could be substantial they are not currently included in the medium term guidance so any early adoption and which we might see as soon as this year actually could increase recognition of that strategic value to the platform. And there's been a bit of an increase in the value of our holdings since the half year of about 26 million, but we remain very focused on that sort of operating thesis and the route to sustainable profitability. Delivery against that should also create more attractive monetization options for us over time without prejudging the timing of those. On the wider portfolio, don't worry, I'm not going to go into all of these in detail. But I think that the central message from this slide is breadth and the fact that the progress was not confined to Pfizer or Oxford Nanocore. Quantum Motion, Quantum Circuits, Oxford completed major funding rounds. First Light Fusion and Mantel 8 raised capital. Pysata secured its first commercial electrolyser order. Sentessa was acquired by Eli Lilly. So there's been good progress across the portfolio. I would just say Oxlard is worth a brief comment in there. So following its strategic rate reset last year and this sharper focus on what we term industrial mobile autonomy it has formed a new joint venture with the divide future foundation called shift and the venture is designed to put autonomous vehicles to work in ports and airports in an integrated product that combines oxford's self-driving software its fleet management platform and its autonomy hardware and this is really targeting you know practical gains in things like productivity, efficiency, safety, and operational resilience within these environments. And the first scalable commercial deployment is planned before the end of 2027. From Dubai's point of view, of course, it's trying to support the stated ambition to double its foreign trade by 2033. Of course, given the current regional uncertainty, the near-term emphasis from the company is correctly on disciplined execution and securing those early deployments. Management definitely deserves the principal credit for delivering that partnership, but it's worth saying IP Group supported the company in bringing it about. And this is hopefully a useful example of how our network and our international network can help portfolio companies across these strategic international partners to accelerate into large markets. Still delivery ahead, but pretty encouraging process from one of the companies that was affected by a significant valuation reduction last year. So overall, the breadth of the financing, the clinical progress and the commercial partnerships provides evidence of greater maturity across the portfolio with a couple of negative movements as a reminder that execution risk always remains in the portfolio. Cash generation was one of the clearest positives from our first half. We realized 69 million, which compared with about 30 million in the first half of last year and as i mentioned it's actually now more than the whole of 2025 and the principal contributors are set out on the slide monoliths and tessa and hinge health and i think they both provide sort of some some good illustrations of our model um hinge health following their 2025 ipo we've now generated a total of 46 million of total proceeds that was a a 50 times multiple of invested capital and almost a 50% IRR. Monolith is a bit different. That provides an example of where we've had a strategic acquisition of an important deep tech capability, and that was an acquisition by CoreWeave. And since then, we've generated around 23 million of proceeds this year with, again, greater than 50% overall IRR. So I think they show that we can create and realize value from different parts of the portfolio, whether that's public market success or a strategic acquisition. And it's exactly the sort of profile that we would expect from a diversified science and technology portfolio. Including post-period end receipts, we've now delivered $154 million, just over $150 million since the beginning of 2025. So we're well over halfway towards our $250 million target by the end of 2027. Looking forward, we continue to see a healthy pipeline of maturing assets and potential realization opportunities over the next 12 to 18 months. Fair to say that timing is never entirely within our control, but the breadth of the portfolio gives us a number of different paths to achieving that target. As a reminder of the way the components of IP Group work together, part walk provides differentiated access at sort of pre-seed seed and into series a through our dedicated eis funds and relationships with leading universities the permanent balance sheet which shareholders are exposed to and support selective companies as they mature while our private funds can add science and technology scale-up capital alongside the balance sheet that additional capital matters in three ways it can accelerate our strongest businesses across a broader opportunity set, it can generate management fees to help reduce our net overheads over time and strong investment performance in those funds can generate performance fees for shareholders. So the model gives us proprietary sourcing, long-term ownership and the potential to increase the capital available to portfolio companies without relying solely on our balance sheet. On the subject of third party capital, we made progress in expanding that platform during the period, although I'd say the focus is now firmly on delivery of the two new mandates that we announced during the first half. Our strategic relationship with Aberdeen is moving quickly towards its first investment and we expect the initial portfolio to be up and running by the end of the year. And this is definitely an early example of a dedicated defined contribution mandate, providing access to scaling science and technology businesses. and you know we believe there is good potential for it to provide a route for further long-term capital savings coming into this sector. In Australia just after our full year results we also launched the 50 million IP group climate catalyst fund that was with the Clean Energy Finance Corporation in Australia which is the sort of equivalent of the Australian Green Bank and similarly for that fund the next milestone is to begin investing that capital by the end of the year into Australian companies that are addressing hard to abate industries. So together with Park Walk and Post Plus and those funds we manage around 550 million of third-party capital and we have further opportunities in the pipeline where we aim to demonstrate material progress over the next 6 to 12 months. So this remains at the moment a smaller part of today's shareholder value story but over time it should help us support more companies, reduce our overheads and create this performance fee potential if we can deliver strong returns. So I'll now turn to the first half outcomes in the portfolio but also the future value opportunities that we see within them. So at 30th of June, the total portfolio is valued at about 900 million, and that's equivalent to about 100 pence per share, 103 pence per share. And the top five assets account for about 50 pence per share. You see them set out on the slide. And probably just worth recognising each of these has different value drivers. So royalty income and clinical de-risking for our licence, listed market performance and path to profitability at Nanopore, clinical milestones at Esteso and Mission, and industrial scale-up at Hisata. As I mentioned, Hisata secured its first binding megawatt scale order during the first half, and delivery is expected in the first half of 2027. And I should also note that Mission Therapeutics, their acute kidney injury program, was acquired by Dimerix for potential consideration of up to nearly 300 million dollars and that that upfront extends the obviously not all that was up front but the upfront they received um will extend mission's runway for its core parkinson's program and i think the broader point here to make is the top five assets do provide distinct groups to value but the other 53 pence per share gives us and shareholders exposure to a much wider group of businesses and the and a good level of optionality within those and i'm just going to highlight a few of those um over the course of the next few slides before i do that it would be worth just um pointing out our successful exit in sentessa this is um another example of realized value not paper value um this our involvement in this company began through a university of Cambridge spin-out that we backed back in 2017. AppSyntex became part of a roll-up Centessa which then listed on Nasdaq in 2021 and then earlier this year it was acquired by Eli Lilly for about six billion dollars up front with a further one and a half billion in potential milestones. For us we sold during the course of the development of that company during its Nasdaq life and the remaining balance and we sold during at the point of completion this year that has given us a realized IRR of about 24 percent and there's a bit of potential CVR payments that could be another sort of three four million pounds potentially and I think really this is just to illustrate the validation of the model so breakthrough university science supported through several stages and has exited to a global pharmaceutical buyer. And we believe that there are a number of assets that look today like AppSyntix did back then at the early part of its journey. In terms of the rest of the therapeutics portfolio, I think there's just a few things to highlight three milestones, particularly from the half standout. Two of these were catalysts that we flagged at the full year and that have now delivered so enterprise therapeutics met its primary endpoint in a phase two cystic fibrosis trial and that showed improved lung function over 28 days compared with placebo and microbiota delivered a second positive phase 1b this time data set and that was in melanoma and i think that's building evidence that its precision microbiome platform, it's sort of gut microbiome platform, can increase or improve responses in these quite difficult to treat indications. Esteso began dosing the new phase 2 study of loramastat in June. As everyone will know, the previous rheumatoid arthritis study didn't meet its primary endpoint, but it showed significant improvements in things like distability, fatigue and reduction in markers of muscle loss and so this trial therefore follows those signals into secondary sarcopenia caused by an RA and we are testing muscle quality repair and function in a randomized double blind placebo controlled study that we'll read out in the second half of 27 this is worth noting that this sort of sarcopenia market is very significant it affects around 110 million people globally and there are no treatments currently approved to treat it so a safe oral treatment that improves function would be a very significant unmet need esteso remains a significant holding from the group from a valuation point of view and we will of course review its valuation through the normal year-end processes in light of the evolving clinical evidence and the commercial opportunity. And I think for today, the important point is that the company has followed the biology into a more focused trial with a clear unmet need and a very differentiated oral regenerative approach. So the common thread across these is large indications, high unmet need, and programs moving into study that provide clearer evidence. And if they're successful support partnering and value realisation. Two of our companies in the quantum space raised significant capital capital this period and they the common thread amongst the amongst these is the IP group and Park Walk were early investors and our balance sheet exposure to quantum companies is probably worth about two pence per share at the half year and these rounds bring substantial third-party capital into that sector and validate the sort of strategic importance of that um and quantum remains genuinely exciting it's a longer duration opportunity but i think alongside it we also have significant ownership in businesses tackling quite immediate constraints in ai computing and i'll just turn to some of those now to round up this section i think one of the themes for us, and I'm sure you are all seeing it across your lives, is that AI is rapidly moving from experimentation into large-scale industrial deployment. And as models become more embedded in products and services, the constraints are increasingly physical in nature. So things like electricity available to data centers, the heat being produced by conventional processes, and also the energy and time required to move data between the memory bit and the compute bit. GPUs remain absolutely central to the system, but they definitely can't solve every part of that equation on their own. So we have three complementary physics led approaches, light, memory and probability. So on the first, Lumai, which is valued at about nine million pounds, about a one pair share where we have a 26 percent holding, uses three dimensional optical computing for the matrix multiplication that goes on at the heart of AI inference. During the period, it announced that its first Irish system is now running billion parameter language models in real time. So that hopefully means something to some of you, I guess, sort of in commercial terms. This is designed for high throughput works, workloads in data centers. and the plan here is to develop that system and work it will work alongside conventional GPUs rather than trying to replace the whole computing stack and if you look at their website you can see those sort of initial products. Intrinsic on the memory side again valued at about a penny a share we own about 28 percent of this this is generating and developing what would what we call next generation um re-ran um that's memory and this is it's important because getting faster and non-volatile i.e remembers and low power memory can sit much closer to the processor and reduce the energy and a little bit of time and moving data between memory and processing um relevant applications here can include things like edge ai autonomous vehicles and wearables remote sensing that sort of thing and the company is well capitalized and is seeing strong commercial interest from important industry participants and then finally at about point uh point two or three p of a share is our holding in quantum dice and this is photonics and it is for probabilistic computing. And the aim here is to try and accelerate problems that required repeated sampling under uncertain conditions. So there's things like logistics and asset management and asset optimization and financial modeling, particularly relevant here. And so things that are used in robotics and machine vision. So three very complementary areas of the value chain. So although these three represent about 20 million each of carrying value, we have 17 to 28 percent, as you can see, ownership. And so a meaningful proportion of any future upside belongs to the group and our shareholders. And each has milestones ahead that could become the next value events.

We expect and hope to be able to report further technical and funding, hopefully some commercial milestones from these businesses. over the next six months or so so with that summary of the main drivers and some of the some of the future value drivers i will hand over to db to take you through the financial results thanks db thank you greg um yes i'll just take you for a quick canter through the financial results it being only the half year uh most of us you've heard already but you know it's always good to reiterate the message so now about one pound 14 was a one pound 14 at the end of the period is actually slightly up we'll see in the release um as of the friday at one pound 17 following improvement in oxford nanopores um price at the end of june that was a 3.2 percent increase uh in the period which is following the 13 increase in period before so we're on a couple of good periods overheads similar slightly up um i would expect i think total overheads last year were just under 16 million i think for the full year that is and i would expect to be something slightly higher than that this year just due to the nature of inflation so probably we'll have a sort of similar amount in the second half maybe slightly more maybe making about 17 million but moved still in control and only really growing by inflation uh gross cash very strong as everybody heard gross cash actually up over the period and i'll talk about that briefly in a minute um balance sheet very simple not much change actually the actual Now, the portfolio value is pretty much exactly flat at about 907, 908 million. And you can see the effect of that. We have invested 30 million in the period, fully itemized in the report, but we've had quite a lot of exits, as you heard, very strong exits of 69 million and more since the period end, and up to 17 million, so our exits have been strong. With the fair value gain then taking us back to where we started, effectively, and so that's what the movement has been. The value of what we've invested, what we've gained, counts as about exactly the money that's been realized, which of course has moved into cash, as we'll see in a minute. Pfizer royalty asset, Greg has explained this, but always good to actually see what it means in terms of the numbers. So we're actually up from about 127 to 153 million. And the main growth, this is a chart I showed you at the time of the full year, and it's got the main programs. If you look at this, there's actually six programs here. And the main one there on the left, or the lead one at the moment is the benetizer monotherapy which is one that's in these phase three clinical trials and no significant change in the value because um the probabilities haven't changed it's still in that phase three trial the next kind of key milestone for that will be if it gets successful completion that trial then those percentages will obviously um go up percentage mobility and therefore the value will go up at that time there has been an increase in the second bar there so that's a combination therapy the with the glp and the amnin uh that moved into a phase 2b trial so that was 25 probability when we last reported it's now 39 if it's successful in that trial it will ultimately move into 53 when it moves into the next phase following the same logic but that has resulted in most of the increase of about 27 million in the period is actually in in that bar there. That's one that's gone up. The third bar, if we're following in the oil bar, we haven't changed the value on. Actually, no, nothing really to report. Greg's already explained. Pfizer did talk about the fact that they've actually terminated one of their oil assets, but that wasn't our one. They had one asset they'd sourced from somewhere else. So at the moment, we haven't really got anything to report on that oil. So at the moment, we're carrying it still at a very low probability of success. And talking about low probability of success is we do, of of course, they'll have three whole programs that are not really valuing at all. Again, Greg mentioned them, but there's what's called a GIPR in terms of the Amlin. That program is now in a phase one clinical trial, as is the ProDrug. And that ProDrug, you can see in the file right there, is actually a quarterly dose of trial and monthly in a phase one trial. Thing is, at the moment, we still consider it too early to actually put values on those. Not least of all, it's very difficult to identify market size to do the calculation. But if they progress, certainly if they progress into phase two trial, we will then have to start recognizing those values. And that will have a relatively significant impact on that value at that time, I would guess. So that's why we still go about 152 million. Going quickly on the funding profile, very slightly different, but pretty much similar as we see. I tend to talk about a third funded, a third in a year, and a third in two years. It's changed very slightly. Actually, we've only got about 6% to fund for the rest of this year, 19% six months after So actually 12 months now is only about 25%. And quite a lot of the funding has actually moved out into the year after that, so after the next half year to the half year after. So if anything, actually the funding profile has slightly improved over other periods. But the truth is, the message always is, the rate at which our companies need to fund is relatively constant and it gives you a chance to fund things as they come along. you don't get a kind of wall of funding requirements and as always i say you know follow the cash on these things the cash is really repeating what we've seen before but the cash has actually improved and that's because investments in about 30 million have been outweighed decision about the exits and a relatively small amount of costs to reduce that um and really what's happened is effectively the profit we've seen that's a 31 million profit has effectively gone into cash that's where it is uh and uh as we've mentioned already we haven't been doing the buyback that's quite a lot of questions about that. I haven't been doing buy back in the period so that money is sitting in cash at the moment and that explains that increase.

And I'll hand back to Greg. Thank you very much Dave. You're welcome. So let's just quickly finish with a recap of the key messages and a little look forward. So as I mentioned at the start the first half of 2026 has been a period of disciplined execution and hopefully growing momentum that you're seeing. Nav per share increased to 114 pence and has increased further to approximately 117 pence since the period end. We delivered 69 million of proceeds in the half and actually mid 80s, 86 million, I think, from for the year to date. And that takes total proceeds since the start of 2025 to 154 million and we remain on track for the 250 million by the end of 2027 and from a portfolio point of view the Pfizer programs continue to de-risk Oxford Nanopore made good financial and commercial progress and the broader portfolio attracted over half a billion of third-party capital while delivering milestones that ranged across therapeutics, quantum, autonomy climate tech and AI enabling compute as Dave said we ended June with 240 million of gross cash and deposits so I think importantly from our point of view the progress is becoming increasingly visible in outcomes so per share value growth cash realizations external validation through funding rounds and hopefully you're seeing clearer routes to potential future value this is the same set of priorities that i outlined we will be targeting this year at the full year haven't changed the slide um i guess the first point to make is the sort of accountability so this is what um what i said we would do and reporting back on the progress that we have made to date so um we've made continued positive nav for share performance we have generated that 154 million of exits, as I mentioned, including those post-period receipts since the beginning of 2025. We've moved the Aberdeen relationship towards its first investment. We announced that further fund, the Climate Catalyst Fund, and we've maintained a disciplined approach to deployment. For the remainder of the year, those objectives sort of largely still stand you know the continued positive nav for share performance making the first investments in those both of those private capital arrangements and keeping executing towards that 250 million exit target so that's the sort of accountability piece i would say the the second point though is more around pace and ambition you'll have seen that michael queen joined us as chair during the half and he brings a substantial level of experience from his role at 3i where he was chief executive and many private markets companies most recently collar capital where he was chair and we also heard a range of views from our shareholders during the summer and we will continue that engagement now as part of this half year results roadshow i would say michael the board and management are using all those inputs to determine and implement the most effective ways for us to be able to accelerate realizations, sharpen our capital allocation, and convert more of the portfolio's underlying value into per share returns, while also retaining the valuation discipline that protects you as shareholders third-party interest and that shareholder engagement we saw during the summer underline for us the attractiveness of the underlying assets and also the strategy that we're following and of course the task for us as a management team now is to convert more of that value into outcomes that you as investors can see in cash and per share returns. As Dave mentioned, we have approximately 50 million of proceeds from realizations that is now available for future shareholder returns under the capital allocation policy that was approved by the board. Now, of course, following the AGM vote, as you would expect as a public company, we are engaging constructively with shareholders on the appropriate form and timing and how we can consider we can deliver against our capital allocation policy. From our perspective, the principle is clear, we should allocate capital where it creates the best risk adjusted per share outcomes. So I want to be clear that this is not simply business as usual. We've got a strong portfolio, we've got a clear strategy for growth them we've got substantial opportunity ahead our priority is execution and converting that opportunity into outcomes that shareholders can see and measure i thank you all very much for your continued support uh db and i will be very happy now to take the questions i'm going to try and try and group them um i'm looking at them as they're coming through some of them i think we've now answered in the presentation on areas like caps allocation and we mentioned the bid process during the summer and probably can't say an awful

lot more on that but yeah that's I agree entirely about exactly what I was gonna say well have a go so please don't be offended this year if I don't include your question I've traditionally did every question I'll do some grouping and as Greg correctly said I think we've really we've certainly covered off the capital allocation I feel we've given a fairly good description around also the bit so i probably won't do any more than those um uh so kane uh analyst and deutsche lovely to have you with us kane as always lots of long questions or a long question with lots of complexity in it um would you consider partially monetizing the fisa royalty interest an attractive opportunity your own or is the intention to remain fully exposed given the potential upside of the program's

progress i hope i answered that one in full um we we have a a default position that we would hold it but um as the as the asset de-risks over the course of the next sort of 12 to 18 months then we think there'll be there could be opportunities that could be attractive and absolutely you know i always say as to all the investment team here you know everything is for sale in the portfolio at the right price so if there was a um an attractive offer of course we would look at it Sorry, I'm sometimes reading the questions.

With respect to the portfolio, it still came, raises of which there's been a lot. Do you think this reflects a genuine improvement in the funding environment or are investors simply becoming more selective and concentrated capital to a smaller number of higher quality assets?

But both and. I mean, we're certainly seeing that in if you look at the broad statistics across the industry, there are some mega rounds that are attracting huge amounts of capital um i mean maybe a good example is uh fusion you know if you look at the analysis of the fusion funding environment um quite a lot of capital has gone into that space um i haven't got the stats to hand but it's in the in the billions um and there are three four five companies that have um identified or have received a substantial amount of that capital with much of a thinner tail. Interestingly, a stat that we were looking at the other day in our analysis of this sector and of course we have our exposure through First Light Fusion and this is an area of particular interest to them. It's something when they analyze the companies in the fusion space about the level of capital that they believe they still needed to access in order to deliver the commercial milestones it was something like four or five x the amount of capital that's been raised even in this increased period so i would say it is it is selective um the environment for certain of the sectors is is strong um we see it as a good validation of um the portfolio and it's a it's a metric that we track and report on for that reason and the last uh basin k and i can probably deal with this uh this is related to the 43 percent of price funding rounds which were down uh people will notice in the report we track for

how many funding rounds are up from the last one how many are flat how many down there's slightly more in this period and the question should we think of this as a lagging effect some impairments would you recognize in prior periods or do you see pockets of valuation pressure across the portfolio funnily enough i i don't want to read too much into it but i number i number it's slightly up Well, the number that are down has slightly increased, I should say, but actually by value they haven't. And also it's important to note, I think, that this is true almost every year I've ever done this. These adjustments are from the last funding round. Actually, we had already recognised all those in the last set of accounts. So we're turning to run ahead of that. So where we think something might be down, we've already factored it into our numbers. These aren't things that normally catch us out. Moving on a little bit. there's we've covered pretty well on the met zero stuff but the particular question just to clarify question was was the 27 million uplift milestone i guess i explained nearly all of it actually was evaluation adjustment there was a small milestone during the period um it was only about three million pounds um the next one back to you greg i think from paul b uh bulk of transaction activity both in exits and investments looks to be concentrated in health tech and ai can you comment on strength or weakness of activity outside of these areas and in which sectors do you see the bulk of activity in the near term yeah that's an interesting one I would

say I've hopefully tried to set out there was quite a breadth both in terms of the larger portfolio companies and the the other milestones and progress underneath that across each of the three main areas in in which we invest um i didn't dwell too much on hisata for example which is um very much in the cleantech space delivering hopefully its first commercial order for a megawatt scale plant um in south america in uh early 2027 in the first half of 2027 so we do see opportunity across all of them i mean interestingly your your question actually is a great observation on what we're seeing in our opportunity set is actually quite a convergence of deep tech, clean tech, and health tech. So many of our opportunities touch those areas in different ways. So Oxer would be a good example. That is a company that that has both a software model and a hardware model. It is clearly deploying machine learning and AI and software into physical environments. In some cases, that is being used to increase efficiency. In some cases, it's being used for security and defense for improving resilience.

And so that's one that probably doesn't touch health tech, for example. um but if you look that that's a trend that we think is interesting and and something that our multidisciplinary science-based approach hopefully gives us a competitive advantage in thank you um i again just to tell us i've seen john b is the amlin does the amlin belong to the group yet it does i explained in the in the uh metzir and that's of uh ip group owns a lot of the fives of weight loss franchise it's quite a few parts not just a not just the lead programs but the combination therapies and the and the pro drug and the gibr so it's quite a wider state of about six different patterned areas which we we originate with ip group um going back the next one i'd say from lucas i think one of our most loyal shareholders definitely deserves your question right out before lucas um congratulations on the strong results given the very positive presentation and very strong underlying performance we still find it difficult to understand what a stock continues to trade at 40 discount level and this is a question we've talked about many times what do you believe the key reasons for this discount well yeah we've we've discussed this a lot haven't we and we that's part of the reason that we have the capital allocation program that we do i mean i guess there are there are broad ways we can

reduce the discount over time um the first is simply delivery you know ultimately discounts narrow when investors gain confidence that our nav growth our portfolio progress our cash realizations are repeatable rather than one-off so that's why we've been so focused on um the nav for share growth the exits and the portfolio execution um the second uh is conversion so we've talked today about the quality of the portfolio but investors quite reasonably want to see more of that value translated into cash and then hopefully into shareholder returns and realized outcomes and that's why we set that 250 million cash exit target i mean we felt that was a you know that was an ambitious target that was i think at the time more than half our entire market cap that we said we were going to deliver in in cash exits and it's obviously why caps allocation remains such an important area of focus um and then i i suppose the third we're increasingly focused on the on the sort of the structure around the portfolio itself so that obviously includes shareholder returns which we need to um engage on further uh during the rest of this year and the development of our third party capital platform um and how we can maximize the value you know we definitely heard a range of views on that front during the summer and we are of course now actively considering how best to reflect those views while remaining disciplined and focused on long-term value creation so i think there isn't a single action that closes a discount of this size i think that sustained delivery the thoughtful shareholder focus capital allocation continued realizations that seems to me the most credible route to narrowing it over time yes and then i won't repeat there's a number of questions about uh reducing the discount a question from john l is sabat a shell that factual answer yes they are they're in about 12 next question from bill h uh has ip group's new chairman bought any shares in the group uh are there any signs yet of harry's contribution to the group's uh um effect will be different from the predecessor you have talked a little bit about this but just perhaps on the shares yeah on the on the shares um yeah mike was very keen to buy shares and and bought them um i think within a week of the uh the end of the offer period um i bought a few more shares too um and i think that well hopefully signifies to shareholders that we you know we believe in the value of the group um believe that there is upside in the share price um and you know voting with our with our capital um i'm i'm very exposed to the ip group share price um as you would expect as a shareholder so it's a um it's my number one kpi obviously uh one from milos is also an analyst nice to have you with us today um how much mna appetite do you see for pre-commercial stage biotech companies from big pharma i would say there is i mean there's always active discussion ongoing um and the route to value creation for that bit of our portfolio um we will hopefully demonstrate over the course of the next 12 18

months i would say there's a number of um the bigger readouts coming um and there you know there remains significant appetite for sure yeah four or five more on the buyback I won't repeat those again this is from Sam E who is also another analyst nice to have you with a Sam thank you how much visibility do you have on realizations that's the end 27 that gives you confidence to deliver on the 250 realization target perhaps I'll answer that one the the forecasting realizations is quite tricky because it's not like the majority of our stocks are public companies if you just make a decision you're going to sell something um a lot of them require also a transaction i've become to maybe float or somebody to buy it however we found we can get relatively accurate on this by looking really into the probability basis and based on that you can see you know up to 15 20 different things that have varying probabilities and overall i think we're relatively or very confident that we will achieve that target in the next year and certainly based upon our axis of forecasting so it comes from a deep knowledge of a large number of companies and understanding relatively realistically what the probabilities of all of them are and once you once you wait for that allow waiting if you see what i mean um you can get relatively accurate forecasts so our visibility is actually good without being precise is what i would say um looking on down um okay um sam again you're back uh outside of direct ai exposure what

extent do you see ai as a value creator across the portfolio versus something that creates the risk of disruption i have a topical question um well it's it's being used significantly i mean we've said that a lot of our the value drivers for our businesses are heavily aligned with with ai and the use of ai and this ranges from things like oxford nanopause base calling um software and an ability to be able to improve the efficiency of that we're seeing it being used in therapeutic areas to help around the clinical trial design and analysis and we're seeing it in we've just done a new um we're just we're just looking at a new uh ai supported materials discovery and development company for example that will have to combine um a direction of travel that we see which is sort of combining the um the digital um electrons with the physical uh atoms and materials in a you know a sort of an iterative loop so i think that's a that's a trend um that will be important actually for the next two three years you know where are the places where there is a sustainable competitive advantage brought about by a technological advantage that can be paired or accelerate paid with or accelerated by the potential for AI and of course we're using it significantly within IP group and and using it to improve all aspects of our business very significantly I think it's you know it's having a profound effect I'm here just as much as it is in in the portfolio and we'll definitely report back more on that over coming months.

There's a couple of rounds of governmental support here which I'm going to combine. So generally what's your engagement of any with the new Burnham government and its focus on backing British business, can the government help you?

A follow-on, are there any concrete developments from the UK government perspective by encouraging pension firms to invest in UK tech? yeah the um i would say the the trend that began of course it is interesting i don't agree not to not to ramble here because it's trying to keep focus but you know sort of look back to where a lot of the current things like mansion house all started they were back in sort of 2016 or so and it's been a number of years for that to come to fruition I mean definitely one thing we've learned over the years is that government support is not something that we build any investment cases around but it is becoming an increasingly important tailwind for us I mean over the last 12 to 18 months we've seen a lot more policy emphasis on innovation science and technology as drivers of uk growth support for scaling companies um and that point definitely around greater engagement with institutional capital and this sort of recognition that particularly in the uk more uk businesses need access to growth funding if they're going to remain and grow here um i think to sort of specifically answer the question i mean i guess the and there was a recent announcement by a big consortium of pension funds endorsed by the UK government and the UK Scale-Up Fund. That's part of wider efforts to bring pension capital into innovation and trying to address that sort of funding gap. I think and would hope that the relationship that we've started with Aberdeen also is a way that we can sort of significantly address that gap. there's a lot of defined contributions so you've got sort of the defined benefit local government pension schemes pool of capital and then you've got the direct contribution DC savers and pool of capital and both present opportunities the Aberdeen one is more on this side of the opportunity and I think there's good strategic alignment between us and Aberdeen and the underlying investors about the opportunity here and getting capital into the space so I

think the overall policy is aligned maybe more aligned around what we're trying to achieve and that's you know building and scaling leading science and technology companies in the UK I'm conscious it's 11 o'clock and I'll see but those that want to go please do but I'm going to we don't say anything you won't be half an hour more there's still a sort of seven or eight questions i'll try and try and um answer those or combine where i can but quite understand if people have to drop off now is what i've mentioned that um there's a um very uh specific question i'll just quickly deal with anyway because it's it was a clever observation by andrew m can i clarify that the high starter valuation at june did not reflect the third party evaluation of submission well it was terrible for you i guess you spotted it hadn't changed much we actually did choose not to change it. The valuation actually was slightly higher, but we thought on balance it made sense to probably leave it until the next Sunday round. We don't always use evaluations as religion, they don't have to adopt them, but they're a useful guide that we are materially in the light area. And we are, the difference is only a material.

The valuation was within the range.

Yeah, it was right at the bottom of the range in the end, so we didn't want to change it. yeah um and uh there's a slightly technical question about the valuation that made zero do the probability ratings go to 100 once an asset's approved or are there commercial risks including that or the peak sales estimates in short yes once it launched your your your probability is now for years 100 but at any time the forecast will change so there is there's doubt both about where you'll get there and when you get there how big it will be so basically sums it up So at any time, you know, you could find the forecast increasing a lot of the increase or vice versa. So those are really the two things to bear in mind. But certainly, once these things launch, you've eliminated your risk of the trial component, your narrative, I guess, risk of market size. Briefly, perhaps, a question about the most exciting new investments, Greg, maybe some of you might want to touch on briefly.

You could go on for a long time about that. but yeah well um i think the the ones that i've tried to to set out and give you a whole list of some of them we've got a you know very interesting um health tech series a business that we just invested into um again sort of slightly later stage there's some opportunities to come into things slightly later stage now looking at analyzing the health of um tissues during surgery again it's it's AI powered enhanced but is enables the both sort of human surgeons and robot surgeons to be able to analyze the integrity and health of tissue which is very important sort of during the during an operation so that's a sort of an interesting one and there's the materials AI driven materials opportunity yeah there's a there's a good breadth all of those sit at the very early stage in that 53p of now per share I've tried to highlight the ones that are probably provide the nearest opportunity for sort of shorter-term catalysts the next 6 to 12 months in the presentation I definitely would say we've had an increase in pace of new investments this year I think we've done six or so year to date on the balance sheet we've continued to do plenty in our part walk funds but I think that six to date is I think double what we did last year if I remember correctly on the balance sheet I think we did about three last year so yeah no we're definitely seeing opportunities for investment and I think you know with the confidence around realizations we need to make sure that shareholders capital is at work and a couple more I'm fine, quite a lot of my repeating so there's a very specific one about the increase in the £1.13 to £1.70 and asking what is that attributable in the portfolio related to valuations probably worth making the point it is just generated by the movement in Oxford and Nanopore, which has performed

strongly since it reported studio results we've not done a still re-evaluation of the portfolio at that date So it's just been adjusted by the mood in the public shares, which is mainly in Annapur. I may well be there. I've covered Sabah. No, I would say that would cover them all. I think I'm back to repeats now. So we didn't overrun by too much.

There's a couple of small ones on the portfolio. I mean, again, whether people are interested in these, did Oxford IP group ever look out or seek to work with Arrigo? i'd have to double check um and um could laramistat be granted orphan drug status by the fdm it has previously been granted orphan drug status in an indication um called idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and ipf um so of course that's something that we our portfolio companies and we work together on in order to build up this sustainable competitive advantage and hopefully contribute to increased commercial value at the time that we get to sort of partnering and exit. So it's certainly something that we'd be looking at. I'm trying to see if there's anything else. There are lots of, you know, to be very transparent, there are a number of questions on differing views amongst our shareholder base and things like that. but I think we've commented, I think, to the extent is appropriate. If we've missed any, apologies.

Yeah, and if you want to reach out, please do. But yeah.

Perfect. Greg, David, at this point, if I may just jump back in there, thank you very much indeed for addressing all of those questions that came in from investors this morning. And of course, if there are any further questions, we'll give them back to you immediately after the presentation for you to review. But Greg, perhaps before really now, just looking to redirect those on the call to provide you with their feedback which is particularly important to yourself and the company. If I could please just ask you for a few closing comments just to wrap up with that'd be great.

Thanks Jake. In summary there's probably three things to highlight. First we've continued to deliver against the priorities that I set out at the start of the year further now for share growth, strong cash realizations and that broad progress across the portfolio. and second to give comfort to shareholders we're seeing that increasing external validation of the quality of those portfolio companies whether that's fundraising strategic partnerships or continued progress in in the therapeutic areas and third we are very focused on turning that progress into tangible shareholder outcomes and we will we will work on that cash allocation piece but the things like active portfolio management and continued cash generation are very high up our priority list.

That's great Greg, David thank you once again for updating investors this morning could I please ask investors not to close this session as you'll now be automatically redirected for the opportunity to provide your feedback. On behalf of the management team of IP Group PLC we would like to thank you for attending today's presentation that now concludes today's session so good morning to you all.