10-Q
American Clean Resources Group, Inc. (ACRG)
UNITEDSTATES
SECURITIESAND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,DC 20549
FORM10-Q
þ QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020
OR
☐ TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission
file number 000-14319
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
(Exact
Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in its Charter)
| Nevada | 84-0991764 |
|---|---|
| (State<br><br> or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S.<br><br> Employer |
| Incorporation<br><br> or Organization) | Identification<br><br> Number) |
611Walnut Street, Gadsden, Alabama 35901
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
(888)960-7347
(Issuer’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former
Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol | Name of each exchange on which registered |
|---|---|---|
| Common<br><br> Stock $0.001 par value | SMPR | OTC |
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports) and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant
has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes ☐ No þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large<br><br> accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated<br><br> filer | ☐ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-accelerated<br><br> filer | ☐ | Smaller<br><br>reporting company | þ |
| Emerging<br><br> growth company | ☐ |
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act:
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant
is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No þ
As
of October 23, 2020, there were 138,630,343 shares of Registrant’s common stock, par value $.001 issued, and 133,630,343
outstanding.
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
FORM10-Q
FORTHE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020
TABLEOF CONTENTS
| Page | ||
|---|---|---|
| PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
| ITEM<br><br> 1 | Financial<br><br> Statements (unaudited) | 1 |
| Condensed<br><br> Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | 1 | |
| Condensed<br><br> Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 | 2 | |
| Condensed<br><br> Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30,2020 and 2019 | 3 | |
| Condensed<br><br> Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Deficit for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and the Year Ended December<br><br> 31, 2019 | 4 | |
| Notes<br><br> to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 5 | |
| ITEM<br><br> 2. | Management’s<br><br> Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 11 |
| ITEM<br><br> 3. | Quantitative<br><br> and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 17 |
| ITEM<br><br> 4. | Controls<br><br> and Procedures | 17 |
| PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | ||
| ITEM<br><br> 1. | Legal<br><br> Proceedings | 18 |
| ITEM 1A. | Risk<br><br> Factors | 18 |
| ITEM<br><br> 2. | Unregistered<br><br> Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 18 |
| ITEM<br><br> 3. | Defaults<br><br> Upon Senior Securities | 18 |
| ITEM<br><br> 4. | Mine<br><br> Safety Disclosures | 18 |
| ITEM<br><br> 5. | Other<br><br> Information | 18 |
| ITEM<br><br> 6. | Exhibits | 18 |
| SIGNATURES | 19 |
i
SPECIALNOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Form 10-Q contains certain statements which are forward-looking in nature and are based on the current beliefs of our management
as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management, general trends in our operations or financial
results, plans, expectations, estimates and beliefs. In addition, when used in this Form 10-Q, the words “may,” “could,”
“should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,”
“plan,” “predict” and similar expressions and their variants, as they relate to us or our management,
may identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our judgment as of the date of this Form 10-Q with respect to
future events, the outcome of which is subject to risks. We have attempted to identify, in context, certain of the factors that
we believe may cause actual future experience and results to differ materially from our current expectations, which may have a
significant impact on our business, operating results, financial condition or your investment in our common stock, as described
in Part II, Item 1A entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 2, 2020.
Readers
are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcomes may vary materially from those described
herein.
We
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. However, your attention is directed to any further disclosures made on related subjects in our subsequent
periodic reports filed with the SEC on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K.
ii
PARTI – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item1. Financial Statements
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
CONDENSEDConsolidated Balance Sheets
| December 31, <br> 2019 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||||
| Current assets: | |||||
| Cash | 2,316 | $ | 1,945 | ||
| Prepaid expenses | 35,448 | -0- | |||
| Total current assets | 37,764 | 1,945 | |||
| Mining and mineral rights | 3,883,524 | 3,883,524 | |||
| Total Assets | 3,921,288 | $ | 3,885,469 | ||
| Liabilities and Shareholders’<br><br> Deficit | |||||
| Current liabilities: | |||||
| Senior secured promissory note payable, related party | 2,229,187 | $ | 2,229,187 | ||
| Promissory notes payable - related party | 477,500 | 477,500 | |||
| Convertible notes payable, including 204,240 from related<br><br> parties | 304,240 | 113,575 | |||
| Accrual for settlement of lawsuits | 3,314,128 | 3,164,309 | |||
| Accounts payable | 1,660,478 | 1,820,741 | |||
| Accrued interest - Related party<br><br> 1,501,249 and 1,325,558 at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | 2,313,131 | 2,100,592 | |||
| Total current liabilities | 10,298,664 | 9,905,904 | |||
| Preferred stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized: | |||||
| Series A, .001 par value, 10,000,000<br><br> and 10,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | |||
| Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6) | |||||
| Shareholders’ deficit: | |||||
| Common stock, 0.001 par value,<br><br> 500,000,000 shares authorized: 138,630,343 and 133,630,343 issued and 129,497,423 and 128,997,423 outstanding at September<br><br> 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively | 133,630 | 128,997 | |||
| Additional paid-in capital | 87,930,342 | 87,712,695 | |||
| Accumulated deficit | (104,441,348 | ) | (103,862,127 | ) | |
| Total shareholders’ deficit | (16,377,376 | ) | (16,020,435 | ) | |
| Total Liabilities and Shareholders’<br><br> deficit | 3,921,288 | $ | 3,885,469 |
All values are in US Dollars.
The
accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
CONDENSEDConsolidated STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
| Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30,<br> <br>2019 | September 30, <br> 2020 | September 30,<br> <br>2019 | |||||||||
| Revenues | --- | $ | --- | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||||||
| General and administrative | 106,058 | 826 | 222,862 | 13,163 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 106,058 | 826 | 222,862 | 13,163 | |||||||
| Loss from operations | (106,058 | ) | (826 | ) | (222,862 | ) | (13,163 | ) | |||
| Other income (expense): | |||||||||||
| Other income | 2,099 | 1,825 | 6,296 | 6,083 | |||||||
| Derecognition of debt | ---- | ---- | 115,424 | --- | |||||||
| Loss on modification of options and warrants | (115,722 | ) | --- | (115,722 | ) | --- | |||||
| Interest expense, including<br><br> related party of 175,681 | (157,493 | ) | (153,340 | ) | (362,357 | ) | (475,825 | ) | |||
| Total other income (expense) | (271,116 | ) | (151,515 | ) | (356,359 | ) | (469,742 | ) | |||
| Loss before income tax provision | (377,174 | ) | (152,341 | ) | (579,221 | ) | (482,905 | ) | |||
| Income tax provision | --- | --- | — | — | |||||||
| Net loss | (377,174 | ) | $ | (152,341 | ) | $ | (579,221 | ) | $ | (482,905 | ) |
| Basic net loss per common share | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) |
| Basic weighted average common shares outstanding | 131,698,652 | 124,497,423 | 129,995,646 | 124,497,423 |
All values are in US Dollars.
The
accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
CONDENSEDConsolidated STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
| For the Nine Months Ended | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30,<br><br>2020 | September 30, <br> 2019 | ||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||
| Net loss | ) | $ | (482,905 | ) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flows provided<br><br> by (used in) operating activities: | |||||
| Gain on derecognition of certain accounts payable and accrued expenses | ) | --- | |||
| Expenses paid directly by related party | --- | ||||
| Expenses paid directly by exercise of options and warrants | --- | ||||
| Loss on modification of options and warrants | --- | ||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities | |||||
| Prepaid expenses | --- | ||||
| Accounts payable | ) | --- | |||
| Accrued interest | 340,357 | ||||
| Accrual for settlement of lawsuits | 144,192 | ||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating<br><br> activities | ) | 1,644 | |||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | — | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | --- | ||||
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | --- | ||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | |||||
| Increase in Cash | $ | 1,644 | |||
| Cash, beginning of period | 1,001 | ||||
| Cash, end of period | $ | 2,645 | |||
| Supplemental cash<br><br> flow disclosures | |||||
| Cash paid for interest cost | |||||
| Income taxes paid | $ | --- | |||
| $ | — | ||||
| Supplemental Disclosure<br><br> of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: | |||||
| Settlement of liabilities through<br><br> direct payment by related party | $ | 109,055 | |||
| Debt discount on through direct<br><br> payment of convertible notes payable | $ | --- | |||
| Conversions of convertible debt and<br><br> accrued interest into common stock | $ | --- | |||
| Expenses paid by exercise of options<br><br> and warrants | $ | --- | |||
| Expenses prepaid by exercise of options<br><br> and warrants | $ | --- |
All values are in US Dollars.
The
accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
CONDENSEDCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FORTHE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 AND
THEYEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
| Accumulated | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | APIC | Deficit | Total | ||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | 124,497,423 | 124,497 | 87,525,115 | (103,184,962 | ) | (15,535,350 | ) | ||||
| Shares issued upon exercise of stock option | 4,500,000 | 4,500 | 187,580 | - | 192,080 | ||||||
| Net loss | --- | - | - | (677,165 | ) | (677,165 | ) | ||||
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 128,997,423 | $ | 128,997 | $ | 87,712,695 | $ | (103,862,127 | ) | $ | (16,020,435 | ) |
| Shares issued upon exercise of stock options and warrants<br><br> including 115,722 modification loss | 4,632,920 | 4,633 | 217,647 | -- | 222,280 | ||||||
| Net loss | --- | --- | --- | (579,221 | ) | (579,221 | ) | ||||
| Balance at September 30,2020 | 133,630,343 | $ | 133,630 | $ | 87,930,342 | $ | (104,441,348 | ) | $ | (16,377,376 | ) |
All values are in US Dollars.
The
accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
NOTESTO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FORTHE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020
(unaudited)
NOTE1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS
Standard
Metals Processing, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Standard Metals” or the “Company”)
is an exploration stage company, incorporated in Nevada having offices in Gadsden, Alabama and through its subsidiary, a property
in Tonopah, Nevada. The business plan is to purchase and install the equipment necessary to complete a facility on the Tonopah
property to serve as a permitted custom processing toll milling facility (which includes an analytical lab, pyrometallurgical
plant, and hydrometallurgical recovery plant).
The
Company plans to perform permitted custom processing toll milling which is a process whereby mined material is crushed and ground
into fine particles to ease the extraction of any precious minerals contained therein, such as minerals in the gold, silver and
platinum metal groups. Custom milling and refining can include many different processes that are designed specifically for each
ore load and to maximize the extraction of precious metals from carbon or concentrates. These toll-processing services also distill,
dry, mix, or mill chemicals and bulk materials on a contractual basis and provide a chemical production outsourcing option for
industrial companies, which lack the expertise, capacity, or regulatory permits for in-house production.
We
are required to obtain several permits before we can begin construction of a small-scale mineral processing facility to conduct
permitted processing toll milling activities and construction of the required additional buildings and well relocation necessary
for us to commence operations.
GoingConcern
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, assuming we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of
assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company
had a net loss of $579,221. At September 30, 2020, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $104,441,348 and a working capital
deficit of $10,260,900. Additionally, all of the Company’s assets are under lien pursuant to the First Deed of Trust, UCC
filings and the pledge of 100% of the common stock of the Company’s subsidiary Tonopah Milling and Metals Group, Inc. and
that of its wholly owned subsidiaries Tonopah Custom Processing, Inc., (“TCP”) and Tonopah Resources, Inc. (“TR”).
Held by GPR, a related party. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on their ability to raise the required additional
capital or debt financing to meet short and long-term operating requirements. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020,
a related party advanced $190,665 on the Company’s behalf to pay certain operating expenses directly. As the related party
intends to apply its advance toward a convertible note, it has been classified as such at September 30, 2020.
Management
believes that private placements of equity capital and/or additional debt financing will be needed to fund our long-term operating
requirements. The Company may also encounter business endeavors that require significant cash commitments or unanticipated problems
or expenses that could result in a requirement for additional cash. If the Company raises additional funds through the issuance
of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our current shareholders could be reduced, and such securities
might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to our common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon acceptable
terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company may not be able to
take advantage of prospective business endeavors or opportunities, which could significantly and materially restrict our operations.
We are continuing to pursue external financing alternatives to improve our working capital position. If the Company is unable
to obtain the necessary capital, the Company may have to cease operations.
5
NOTE2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principlesof Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Standard Metals Processing, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary Tonopah
Milling and Metals Group, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Tonopah Custom Processing, Inc., (“TCP”) and Tonopah
Resources, Inc. (“TR”) All significant intercompany transactions, accounts and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basisof Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), for interim financial information pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 filed April 2, 2020. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
of normal recurring adjustments unless otherwise indicated) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
year as a whole.
MineralProperties
Mineral
property acquisition costs are recorded at cost and are deferred until the viability of the property is determined. No properties
have produced operating revenues at this time. Exploration, mineral property evaluation, option payments, related acquisition
costs for mineral properties acquired under an option agreement, general overhead, administrative and holding costs to maintain
a property on a care and maintenance basis are expensed in the period they are incurred. When reserves are determined for a property
and a bankable feasibility study is completed, subsequent exploration and development costs on the property would be capitalized.
If a project were to be put into production, capitalized costs would be depleted on the unit of production basis.
Management
reviews the net carrying value of each mineral property as changes may materialize with a property or at a minimum, on an annual
basis. Where information and conditions suggest impairment, estimated future net cash flows from each property are calculated
using estimated future prices, proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, and operating, capital
and reclamation costs on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the future cash flows are less than the carrying value,
a write-down to the estimated fair value is made with a charge to loss for the period. Where estimates of future net cash flows
are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses if the carrying value can be recovered.
Management’s
estimates of gold prices, recoverable reserves, probable outcomes, operating capital and reclamation costs are subject to risks
and uncertainties that may affect the recoverability of mineral property costs. The Company does not own any mining claims. It
owns tailings located on the Tonopah property and some tailings located in Manhattan, Nevada. The Company has not disturbed or
processed any of this material and does not intend to do so in the foreseeable future.
Impairmentof Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets
The
Company will periodically evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, including but not limited to,
mineral properties, mine tailings, mine dumps, capital assets and intangible assets, when events and circumstances warrant such
a review and at least annually. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted
cash flow from such asset is separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized
based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. Fair value is determined primarily
using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed
of are determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the cost to dispose.
Useof Estimates
Preparing
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
6
RevenueRecognition and Deferred Revenue
As
of September 30, 2020, the Company has not recognized any revenues from custom permitted processing toll milling. If we achieve
revenue generation, the Company plans to report such revenues consistent with ASC Topic 606.
IncomeTaxes
Income
taxes are accounted for based upon an asset and liability approach. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from
the difference between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements. Deferred tax
amounts are determined using the tax rates expected to be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds received,
as provided under currently enacted tax law. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets
to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense or benefit is the tax payable or refundable, respectively, for the period
plus or minus the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period.
Accounting
guidance requires the recognition of a financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant
tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not
threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood
of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. The Company believes its income tax filing positions
and deductions will be sustained upon examination and accordingly, no reserves, or related accruals for interest and penalties
have been recorded at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The Company recognizes interest and penalties on unrecognized
tax benefits as well as interest received from favorable tax settlements within income tax expense.
On
December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed and enacted into law H.R. 1 (the “Tax Reform Law”). The
Tax Reform Law, effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, except for certain provisions, resulted in significant
changes to existing United States tax law, including various provisions that are expected to impact the Company. The Tax Reform
Law reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 34% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Management believes the provisions of the
Tax Reform Law will have a favorable impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements should it attain a level
of profitable operations.
RecentAccounting Standards
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires all leases that have a term of
over 12 months to be recognized on the balance sheet with the liability for lease payments and the corresponding right-of-use
asset initially measured at the present value of amounts expected to be paid over the term. Recognition of the costs of these
leases on the income statement will be dependent upon their classification as either an operating or a financing lease. Costs
of an operating lease will continue to be recognized as a single operating expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Costs for a financing lease will be disaggregated and recognized as both an operating expense (for the amortization of the right-of-use
asset) and interest expense (for interest on the lease liability). This standard will be effective for our interim and annual
periods beginning January 1, 2019 and must be applied on a modified retrospective basis to leases existing at, or entered into
after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. The
Company has adopted the standard during 2018, but as the Company does not have any significant leases, it does not expect it to
have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and through the date of this filing, there were several new accounting pronouncements
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by
the Company. Management does not believe the adoption of any of these accounting pronouncements has had or will have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
7
NOTE3 – MINING AND MINERAL RIGHTS
The
Company is preparing the Tonopah property site for the construction of a permitted custom processing toll milling facility including
grading the land, installing fencing and working with contractors for our planned 21,875 square foot building and servicing and
drilling various wells for our future operations.
The
Company has continued to assess the realizability of its mining and mineral rights. Based on an assessment the Company conducted
in January 2020. The Company decided its land, mineral rights and water rights are inseparable and depend upon each other in value
creation. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company combined the carrying value of the assets to present
more clearly their intended use together.
NOTE4 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
On
March 16, 2020 the Company executed a Line of Credit (“LOC”) with Granite Peak Resources, LLC (“GPR”),
a related party, evidenced by a convertible promissory note. The LOC is for up to $2,500,000, provides that all requests for funds
may be approved or disapproved in GPR’s sole discretion, matures over three years, bears interest at 10% per annum, is convertible
into shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share price of $0.04, and will be secured by the real and personal property
GPR already has under lien or in pledge. See Note 7. The LOC is for funding operating expenses critical to the Company’s
redirection including the resolution, on terms and conditions satisfactory to GPR, of the Company’s claims. However, GPR
and the Company make no representation that the Company’s claims can be satisfactorily resolved voluntarily. Accordingly,
GPR and the Company reserve all rights to employ every means legally available to seek the Company’s recapitalization.
At
December 31, 2019, GPR had advanced $13,575 in contemplation of the LOC. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 GPR advanced
an additional $190,665 which it used to pay directly certain operating expenses on the Company’s behalf. Both advances,
amounting to $204,230 in total, have been included in the convertible promissory note issued by the Company in connection with
the LOC and classified accordingly at September 30, 2020.
Including
the foregoing advances under the LOC, there was $304,240 of principal and $114,069 of accrued interest outstanding on convertible
debentures at September 30, 2020. With exception of the $204,240 of principal advanced under the LOI to date, the pre-existing
convertible note is in default.
NOTE5 – SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CommonStock
CommonStock issued on conversion of notes payable
On
December 21, 2019 a promissory note payable totaling $192,080 was exchanged as consideration for exercising a stock option for
4,500,000 restricted common shares at a Board approved reduced exercise price of $0.0426, which was the market price on exercise.
OptionGrants
OptionGrants
The
Company recorded no compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019. As of September 30, 2020, there
was $0 in unrecognized compensation expense.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company did not grant any options, 826,223 options expired, and none were cancelled.
In addition, 2,750,000 options were exercised at the reduced price of $0.023 per share based upon market conditions. Of the options
exercised 2,250,000 were modified as to exercise date resulting in a loss on modification of $63,000.
8
The
following tables summarize information about stock options outstanding and exercisable:
| Range of Exercise Prices | Weighted <br> Remaining <br><br><br> Contractual <br> Life | Weighted <br> Average <br><br><br> Exercise <br> Price | Aggregate <br> Intrinsic<br><br><br> Value ^(1)^ | |||
| 0.40 to 0.60 | 250,000 | .04 years | $ | 0.60 | $ | — |
| 0.61 to 1.00 | 9,000,000 | .04 years | $ | 0.66 | $ | — |
| 1.01 to 1.50 | 13,000,000 | .06 years | $ | 1.25 | $ | — |
| 1.51 to 2.25 | 2,250,000 | .51 years | $ | 1.93 | $ | — |
| 0.40 to 2.25 | 24,500,000 | .09 years | $ | 1.07 | $ | — |
All values are in US Dollars.
| (1) | The<br><br> aggregate intrinsic value in the table represents the difference between the closing stock price on September 30, 2020 and<br><br> December 31, 2019, and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options that would have been received<br><br> by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. |
|---|
Common
Stock Purchase Warrants
For
warrants granted to non-employees in exchange for services, the Company recorded the fair value of the equity instrument using
the Black-Scholes pricing model unless the value of the services is more reliably measurable.
The
Company did not grant any warrants during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, 1,882,290 warrants were exercised, 2,732,720
expired, and none were cancelled. The 1,882,290 warrants were exercised at the reduced price of $0.023 per share and modified
as to exercise date resulting in a loss on modification of $52,722. At September 30, 2020 there were 307,500 more warrants outstanding
The
aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding and exercisable warrants at September 30, 2020, was $0. The intrinsic value is the
difference between the closing stock price on September 30, 2020 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money
warrants had all warrant holders exercised their warrants on September 30, 2020.
NOTE6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LegalMatters
StephenE. Flechner v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc.
On
April 29, 2014, Stephen E. Flechner filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Standard
Metals Processing, Inc. alleging that Standard Metals had refused to allow him to exercise stock options granted to him pursuant
to a Stock Option Agreement, dated April 1, 2010, and a second Stock Option Agreement, dated January 21, 2011. On June 12, 2014,
Standard Metals filed an Answer and a Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay or Transfer the action to the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division. On January 16, 2015, Standard Metals filed a Motion for
Summary Judgment. On January 23, 2015, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Standard Metals’ Motion
to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay or Transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Alabama, Middle Division. The Court in its Order stayed further proceedings in Colorado pending the issuance of orders by the
Alabama court. Thereafter, on January 26, 2015, the Court issued an Order vacating the February 20, 2015 Trial Preparation Conference
and the March 9, 2015 Bench Trial. On March 23, 2015, the Court issued an Order denying Standard Metals’ Motion for Summary
Judgment. On March 30, 2015, Flechner filed a Motion to Lift the Stay. On March 31, 2015, the Court issued an Order granting Flechner’s
Motion to Lift the Stay. On April 6, 2015, the Court issued an Order scheduling a Bench Trial for July 29, 2015. On April 9, 2015,
Flechner filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s March 23, 2015 Order Denying Flechner’s Motion to Enforce
the Confidential Settlement Agreement to Settle Certain Issues. On May 1, 2015, the Court issued an Order Granting Flechner’s
Motion to Enforce the Confidential Settlement Agreement to Settle Certain Issues. On August 12, 2015 the United Stated District
Court for the District of Colorado issued a judgment in favor of Stephen E. Flechner for $2,157,000. An amended final judgment
was ordered in adjudication of the Complaint by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (the “Court”)
on August 28, 2015 in favor of Flechner in the amount of $2,157,000, plus interest through the date of judgment of $235,246, plus
interest of $472.76/day from August 28, 2015 until paid in full. The Company, in good faith anticipation of a settlement did not
appeal the judgment and therefore, the Company’s notice of appeal was dismissed on November 17, 2015. This judgment is now
non-appealable. The Company has recognized the daily interest due from the date of the August 28, 2015 judgment through September
30, 2020, totaling $921,882, resulting in a total amount of $3,314,128 being included in the Accrual for settlement of lawsuits
relating to this matter in the accompanying September 30, 2020 condensed consolidated balance sheet.
9
NOTE7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During
March 2019, the Company was informed that a change of control of the Company had occurred. Granite Peak Resources, LLC (“GPR”)
through its members (including Pure Path Capital Management LLC) acquired 69,464,434 shares of common stock (including 4,500,000
warrants to purchase common stock). The members transferred their shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for a pro-rata
ownership interest in GPR. GPR also acquired the senior secured creditor position previously held by Pure Path Capital Group LLC,
which includes a $2,500,000 First Deed of Trust on the Tonopah property and an outstanding promissory note with a principal balance
of $2,229,187 and accrued interest of $1,283,644 as of September 30, 2020. The members of Granite Peak Resources LLC are listed
in the Schedule 13D filed by GPR on March 29, 2019. GPR has not communicated to the Company any plans to change any of the current
officers or directors or governing documents and has expressed the purpose of its acquisition is to assist the Company execute
on its business plan and resolve its current obligations and other claims. Neither GPR nor the Company, however, can give any
assurances that such creditors or claimants will be amicably resolved. As of the date of this filing, GPR is the beneficial owner
of 56.4% of the Company’s common stock and the Company’s largest secured creditor. The background regarding Pure Path’s
Senior Secured Note is described below.
During
the Company’s acquisition of the Shea assets in 2011, Pure Path purchased the Loan Modification Agreement and the NJB Forbearance
Agreement directly from NJB Mining, Inc. In connection with the assignment of a forbearance agreement the Company and Pure Path
executed an Agreement in Principle setting forth terms of the forbearance agreement which were subsequently further revised pursuant
to Settlement and Release Agreement executed October 10, 2013 with the Company (collectively the “Pure Path Agreements”).The
Pure Path Agreements provided for Pure Path’s forbearance of collection remedies and legal proceedings against the Company
including foreclosure on the Deed of Trust, and, in connection with the settlement and release of various debts of approximately
$1,500,000 and the consulting fees owed by the Company, the Company issued 27,000,000 restricted shares and a Promissory Note
(the “Pure Path Note”) for an amount of up to $2,500,000 with a beginning principal balance of $1,933,345 bearing
interest of 8% per year for the current balance of the amounts owed under the Pure Path Agreements. The forbearance period has
long since expired and the Pure Path Note has retained all of its original remedies under its First Deed of Trust. In addition,
pursuant to a Forbearance Agreement with GPR dated December 20, 2019, the Company pledged of 100% of its stock in Tonopah Milling
and Metals Group, Inc. and that of its subsidiaries TCP and TR, in exchange for GPR’s agreement to forbear foreclosure proceedings
for six months further securing GPR’s combined Pure Path Note and LOC positions. The outstanding principal balance on the
Pure Path Note was $2,229,187 as of both September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, with related accrued interest of $1,283,644
and $1,143,474, respectively. This Senior Secured Note is in default. GPR’s LOC position is described in Note 4.
On
February 11, 2015, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note (the “Note”) to Tina Gregerson Family Properties,
LLC, an entity controlled by a former director of the Company. The Note for up to $750,000 was provided in tranches. Maturity
of each tranche is one year from the date of receipt. Interest accrues at 8% per annum on each tranche. Under the terms of the
Note, the Company received $477,500. At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, there is $210,761 and $182,084 interest
accrued. This Note is in default.
On
April 17, 2020, the Company and Sustainable Metal Solutions, LLC (“SMS”), an affiliate of GPR, agreed to form a joint
venture styled Esmeralda Renewal Energy Zone (“EREZ”). The Company has agreed to contribute the solar energy rights
attributable to its 1,083 acres to EREZ in exchange for SMS’s agreement to develop, manage and underwrite the EREZ venture.
NOTE8 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic
net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents,
consisting of shares that might be issued upon exercise of options, warrants and conversion of convertible debt. In periods where
losses are reported, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents, because their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
At
September 30, 2020 the weighted average shares from stock options of 24,500,000, warrants of 250,000, and Convertible Promissory
note shares of 5,306,000 , and at December 31, 2019 the weighted average shares from stock options of 32,576,223 warrants of 4,865,640
and Convertible Promissory note shares of 650,869 were excluded from the diluted weighted average common share calculation due
to the antidilutive effect such shares would have on net loss per common share.
NOTE9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
October 15, 2020, options to purchase 21,750,000 common shares expired reducing the 24,500,000 options outstanding at September
30, 2020 to 2,750,000.
10
ITEM2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in connection with
the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report and the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019, as filed with the SEC on April 2, 2020.
CautionaryNotice Regarding Forward Looking Statements
Readers
are cautioned that the following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with
the “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” appearing at the beginning of this Quarterly Report.
The
information contained in this Item 2 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may materially differ
from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this report.
Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable,
there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different
from expectations expressed in this report.
As
used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Company,” “we,”
“us,” and “our” refer to Standard Metals Processing, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Tonopah Milling
and Metals Group, Inc. (“TMMG”), and TMMG’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Tonopah Custom Processing, Inc. (“TCP”)
and Tonopah Resources, Inc. (“TR”). Unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States
dollars.
CorporateHistory
We
were incorporated in the State of Colorado on July 10, 1985 and re-domiciled in Nevada in March 2013. In 2011, we closed a series
of transactions, whereby we acquired certain assets of Shea Mining & Milling, LLC, which assets include land, buildings, a
dormant milling facility, abandoned milling equipment, water permits, mine tailings, mine dumps and the assignment of a note payable,
a lease and a contract agreement with permits. We completed the Shea Exchange Agreement in order to offer toll milling services
of precious minerals. Toll milling is a process whereby mined material is crushed and ground into fine particles to ease the extraction
of any precious minerals contained therein, such as gold, silver, and platinum group metals. Custom milling and refining can include
many different processes to extract precious metals from carbon or concentrates. These toll-processing services also distill,
dry, mix, or mill chemicals and bulk materials on a contractual basis and provide a chemical production outsourcing option for
industrial companies which lack the expertise, capacity, or regulatory permits for in-house production.
Overviewof the Company
We
have an office in Gadsden, Alabama and, through a subsidiary, a property in Tonopah, Nevada. Our business plan is to purchase
equipment and build a facility on the Tonopah property to serve as a permitted custom processing toll milling facility which includes
an analytical lab, pyrometallurgical plant, and hydrometallurgical recovery plant. We are required to obtain several permits before
we can begin construction of a small-scale mineral processing facility and the required additional buildings to conduct permitted
processing toll milling activities and commence operations.
11
WaterPollution Control Permit with Nevada Department of Environmental Protection
Through
the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, a Water Pollution Control Permit (“WPCP”) Application was filed with
the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (“NDEP”) Bureau of Mines and Mining Reclamation (“BMMR”)
for the approval of the permits necessary for a small-scale mineral processing facility planned for the Tonopah property. The
plant will perform laboratory testing, pilot testing, and custom processing of precious metal ores and concentrates from mining
industry clients. Processing of ore materials will employ standard mineral processing techniques including gravity concentration,
froth flotation and chemical leaching and carbon stripping.
The
WPCP must be approved prior to commencing the planned construction of our processing plant in Tonopah, Nevada.
In
connection with our WPCP application, NDEP suggested that we take the following actions: (i) retain a Nevada Certified Environmental
Manager (“CEM”), (ii) perform Meteoric Profile II water testing on ground water directly below the mill as well as
surrounding wells located off site, and (iii) determine baseline values of water using the Meteoric Profile II results. NDEP regulations
require that the Company delay any new construction planned for “metal extraction” until after the permits are in
place.
Advanced
Surveying & Professional Services, a Professional Land Surveyor (“PLS”), completed surveys and testing of the
Tonopah property required for the application of our required permits. After completion of the survey, it was determined the property
is 1,186 acres. The scope of work the PLS completed includes: (i) setting a total of 19 permanent monuments at angle points along
lines, (ii) setting eight permanent monuments locating US Hwy 95, (iii) recording a professional map indicating longitude and
latitude for all corners, and (iv) providing a digital map accessible in Auto Cad software.
Site
Preparation
We
have completed the initial grading of specific designated areas on the 40 undisturbed acres of land including clearing all vegetation,
removing of all scrap metal, and the excavation of the building pad for preparation of the our planned new 21,875 square foot
processing plant and have completed the removal of all the extra and unnecessary materials and old equipment that has accumulated
on the land. We have also refurbished a trailer that will act as our construction office.
BusinessPlan
The
Company is reexamining its next steps for developing a processing facility. In an effort to move the Company’s business
plan forward, the Company may evaluate opportunities to acquire, license, or joint venture with other parties involved in toll
milling, processing, or mining related activities, which may include Granite Peak Resources, LLC and its affiliated entities including,
but not limited to, Sustainable Metal Solutions LLC, NovaMetallix, Inc, and Black Bear Natural Resources, LTD.
On
March 27, 2020 GPR engaged NovaMetallix, Inc. (“NMX”), a member of the Sustainable Metal Solutions LLC, and a GPR
affiliate, to conduct a study of the quantity and quality of the Company’s historic mine tailings which are subject to GPR’s
First Deed of Trust, and the economic feasibility of processing them to reclaim their residual content of gold, silver, and other
valuable metals. NMX, a firm comprised of world class mining, geological and metallurgical engineering professionals, is
the leading force in the rapidly developing field of sustainable metals. NMX has agreed to conduct the study of the Company’s
tailings in exchange for GPR’s agreement to underwrite its cost and expense, and the exclusive right to process the tailings
should their economic assessment prove positive. The terms of such processing to be mutually agreed upon between GPR, NMX
and the Company in the future based on the results of the assessment. It was previously erroneously disclosed the Company had
engaged NMX.
On
April 17, 2020, the Company and Sustainable Metal Solutions, LLC (“SMS”), an affiliate of GPR, agreed to form a joint
venture styled Esmeralda Renewal Energy Zone, LLC (“EREZ”). The Company has agreed to contribute the solar energy
rights attributable to its 1,083 acres to EREZ in exchange for SMS’s agreement to develop, manage and underwrite the EREZ
venture.
12
Productsand Services
We
plan to establish ourselves as a custom processing and permitted toll milling service provider. Our business plan is to build
a facility on our Tonopah property, which includes an analytical lab, pyrometallurgical, and hydrometallurgical recovery plant.
The
Company’s intention is to become a full service permitted custom toll milling and processing company that facilitates the
extraction of precious and strategic minerals from mined material. The Company is in the process of obtaining the permits needed
for construction and operation of our permitted custom processing toll milling facility with state of the art equipment capable
of processing gold, silver and platinum metal groups. Many junior miners do not have the capital or the ability to permit a processing
facility, yet they have a large supply of mined material that requires milling be performed. It is often cost prohibitive or impractical
for these mine operators to send their materials to processing mills owned by the large mining companies, or to other customers
with badly needed milling and processing services.
While
Nevada has a historic role as a mining center with good proximate geology and ample mined product, very little custom processing
toll milling capacity remains in the state. During the last several decades, other processing facilities have been shuttered due
to high costs of regulations and the vertical integration of milling within large mining companies leaving junior miners with
few options for local milling services. As a result, we are in a unique position among processing facilities because we are capable
of true permitted custom processing. We have the only ball mill located within a custom toll milling facility within 300 miles
allowing us to serve miners in the western United States, Canada, Mexico, and Central America.
Many
junior miners are undercapitalized, have limited access to capital markets and have a large supply of mined material that requires
milling be performed. Many large mining companies reserve their milling capacity for their inventory, which does not make providing
third party services worthwhile. This provides the Company with an opportunity to provide these potential customers with badly
needed milling and processing services. Some of our mining customers will be able to take their tailings (the material left over
after the desired minerals have been extracted) from the material they deposited with the Company and put it back in the exact
same mines those particular tailings came from. This eliminates the need for the Company to dispose of those tailings.
Resultsof Operation
Comparisonof Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 to Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
Revenues
We
had no revenues from any operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019. Furthermore, we do
not anticipate any significant future revenue until we have sufficiently funded construction and begin operations.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses were $106,058 for the three months ended September 30, 2020, as compared to $862 for the same period
in 2019. For the three months ended September 30, 2019, general and administrative expenses declined materially due to reduced
office costs consistent with lack of funding. In the three months ended September 30, 2020, the $106,058 total related principally
to resumption of normal accounting and legal costs plus the additional cost of the combined loss on modification of options and
warrants. We anticipate that that operating expenses will increase during the remainder of 2020 as we continue to access more
funding support.
13
Other
Income and Expenses
We
receive monthly lease payments of from American Tower Corporation for a cellular tower located on our Tonopah land. As such Other
Income for the three months ended September 30, 2020 was $2,099 compared to $1,825 for the respective period in 2019.
Periodically
the Company reviews the outstanding claims that have not been satisfactorily resolved. In some instances, these claims remain
outstanding beyond their statutory limit on collection in which case they are written off. The gain on derecognition of claims
during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 amounted to $115,424 resulting in a $579,221 net loss for the period.
Interest
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $362,357, compared to $475,825 for the same period in 2019. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2020 the rate of interest being accrued on certain delinquent vendor claims was reexamined and
reduced to a rate more likely to apply to the claims upon resolution. This interest accrual reduction of approximately 25% resulted
in a cumulative savings of $143,312 in the nine months ended September 30, 2020.
Liquidityand Capital Resources
Liquidity
is a measure of an entity’s ability to secure enough cash to meet its contractual and operating needs as they arise. We
have funded our operations and satisfied our capital requirements through the issuance of convertible debt during the nine months
ended September 30, 2020 and 2019. We do not anticipate generating sufficient net positive cash flows from our operations to fund
the next twelve months. We had a working capital deficit of $10,260,900 at September 30, 2020. Cash was $2,316 at September 30,
2020, as compared to cash of $1,945 at December 31, 2019.
Our
cash reserves will not be sufficient to meet our operational needs and thus, we need to raise additional capital to pay for our
operational expenses and provide for capital expenditures. Our basic operational expenses are currently estimated at approximately
$20,000 per month. Above the basic operational expenses, we estimate that we need approximately $10,000,000 to begin limited toll
milling operations. If we are not able to raise additional working capital, we may have to cease operations altogether.
RecentFinancings
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020, a related party advanced $190,665 which it used to pay directly, on the Company’s
behalf, to reduce certain accounts payable and assist with operating expenses. The advance was made by Granite Peak Resources,
LLC (“GPR”), a related party which intends to convert the advance into a convertible promissory note. Additionally,
$106,558 was provided by the exercise of options and warrants in May and August, 2020 at a reduced price of $0.023 per
share providing $106,558 for operations. As the options and warrants exercised in August 2020 were modified as to exercise
date, their modification resulted in a combined loss of $115,722 .
On
March 16, 2020 the Company executed a Line of Credit (“LOC”) with GPR, a related party, evidenced by a convertible
promissory note. The LOC is for up to $2,500,000, matures over three years, bears interest at 10% per annum, is convertible into
shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share price of $0.04, and will be secured by the real and personal property
GPR already has under lien and pledge. The LOC is for funding operating expenses critical to the Company’s redirection and
all requests for funds may be approved or disapproved in GPR’s sole discretion.
14
GoingConcern
The
condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has accumulated losses from inception through the period ended September
30, 2020 of $104,441,348 and a working capital deficit of $10,260,900 as well as negative cash flows from operating activities.
Presently, the Company does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its debt obligations in the twelve months following the
date of this filing. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management
is in the process of evaluating various financing alternatives to finance its capital requirements, as well as for general and
administrative expenses. These alternatives include raising funds through public or private equity markets and either through
institutional or retail investors. Although there is no assurance that the Company will be successful with its fund-raising initiatives,
management believes that the Company will be able to secure the necessary financing as a result of ongoing financing discussions
with third party investors and existing shareholders.
The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue
as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing
as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability. If the Company raises additional funds through the issuance of equity,
the percentage ownership of current shareholders could be reduced, and such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges
senior to the rights, preferences and privileges of the Company’s common stock. Additional financing may not be available
upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company may
not be able to take advantage of prospective business endeavors or opportunities, which could significantly and materially restrict
its future plans for developing its business and achieving commercial revenues. If the Company is unable to obtain the necessary
capital, the Company may have to cease operations.
WorkingCapital Deficiency
| September 30,<br> 2020 | December 31,<br> 2019 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current assets | $ | 37,764 | $ | 1,945 | ||
| Current liabilities | 10,298,664 | 9,905,904 | ||||
| Working capital deficiency | $ | (10,260,900 | ) | $ | (9,903,959 | ) |
The
balance and components of current assets are fairly consistent between periods. The increase in current liabilities is primarily
due to accrual of interest on settlement of lawsuits and notes due related parties.
CashFlows
| Nine Months Ended<br> <br>September 30, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (106,187 | ) | $ | 1,644 |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 106,558 | --- | |||
| Increase (Decrease) in cash | $ | 371 | $ | 1,644 |
Operating
Activities
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities was $(106,187) and $1,644, during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and
2019, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 cash was provided by operating activities primarily due to
the significant reductions in legal and accounting services and normal office expenses as a result of lack of funding.
Financing
Activities
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2020, net cash provided by financing activities was $106,558, primarily due to the exercise
of stock options and warrants. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, net cash provided by financing activities was $-0-.
15
Off-BalanceSheet Arrangements
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in item 303(a)(4)
of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.
Effectsof Inflation
We
do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our business, revenues or operating results during the periods presented.
CriticalAccounting Policies and Estimates
Our
significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our financial statements included herein for the nine
months ended September 30, 2020 and in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. We believe that the accounting policies below are critical for one to fully
understand and evaluate our financial condition and results of operations.
Impairmentof Long-lived Assets
We
review our property and mining and mineral rights subject to amortization and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset class may not be recoverable. Indicators of potential
impairment include: an adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of the asset; an
adverse change in the extent or manner in which the asset is used or is expected to be used, or in its physical condition; and
current or forecasted operating or cash flow losses that demonstrate continuing losses associated with the use of the asset. If
indicators of impairment are present, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the
related estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset. If the expected cash flows are less than
the carrying value of the asset, then the asset is considered to be impaired and its carrying value is written down to fair value,
based on the related estimated discounted cash flows. During the three months ended September 30, 2019, the company evaluated
that the carrying value of our mining and mineral assets, while not impaired, should be combined as they are inseparable and depend
upon each other in value creation. See Note 3. There were no impairment charges in the nine months ended September 30, 2020.
RecentAccounting Standards
In
May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue
to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most
existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for annual reporting
periods for public business entities beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period.
The new standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09
January 1, 2018, and as there have been no revenues to date, the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position or results of operations, and no transition method was necessary upon adoption.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires all leases that have a term of
over 12 months to be recognized on the balance sheet with the liability for lease payments and the corresponding right-of-use
asset initially measured at the present value of amounts expected to be paid over the term. Recognition of the costs of these
leases on the income statement will be dependent upon their classification as either an operating or a financing lease. Costs
of an operating lease will continue to be recognized as a single operating expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Costs for a financing lease will be disaggregated and recognized as both an operating expense (for the amortization of the right-of-use
asset) and interest expense (for interest on the lease liability). This standard will be effective for our interim and annual
periods beginning January 1, 2019 and must be applied on a modified retrospective basis to leases existing at, or entered into
after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. The
Company adopted this standard during 2018, but as the Company does not have any significant leases, it does not expect it to have
a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and through the date of this filing, there were several new accounting pronouncements
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by
the Company. Management does not believe the adoption of any of these accounting pronouncements has had or will have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
16
Item3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not
Applicable.
Item4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluationof Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
(who is our Principal Executive Officer) and our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (who is our Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer), of the effectiveness of the design of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2020 pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation,
our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as of June 30, 2020 in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms. This conclusion is based on findings that constituted material weaknesses. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination
of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Company’s interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In
performing the above-referenced assessment, management identified the following deficiencies in the design or operation of our
internal controls and procedures, which management considers to be material weaknesses:
(i)
Lack of Formal Policies and Procedures. We utilize a third party independent contractor for the preparation of our financial
statements. Although the financial statements and footnotes are reviewed by our management, we do not have a formal policy to
review significant accounting transactions and the accounting treatment of such transactions. The third party independent contractor
is not involved in the day to day operations of the Company and may not be provided information from management on a timely basis
to allow for adequate reporting/consideration of certain transactions.
(ii)
Audit Committee and Financial Expert. We do not have a formal audit committee with a financial expert, and thus we lack
the board oversight role within the financial reporting process.
(iii)
Insufficient Resources. We have insufficient quantity of dedicated resources and experienced personnel involved in reviewing
and designing internal controls. As a result, a material misstatement of the interim and annual financial statements could occur
and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
(iv)
Entity Level Risk Assessment. We did not perform an entity level risk assessment to evaluate the implication of relevant
risks on financial reporting, including the impact of potential fraud related risks and the risks related to non-routine transactions,
if any, on internal control over financial reporting. Lack of an entity-level risk assessment constituted an internal control
design deficiency which resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material error would not have been prevented or detected
and constituted a material weakness.
Our
management feels the weaknesses identified above have not had any material effect on our financial results. However, we are currently
reviewing our disclosure controls and procedures related to these material weaknesses, and expect to implement changes in the
near term, as resources permit, in order to address these material weaknesses. Our management will continue to monitor and evaluate
the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis
and is committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds
permit.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems,
no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Changesin Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
17
PARTII – OTHER INFORMATION
Item1. Legal Proceedings
StephenE. Flechner v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc.
On
April 29, 2014, Stephen E. Flechner filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Standard
Metals Processing, Inc. alleging that Standard Metals had refused to allow him to exercise stock options granted to him pursuant
to a Stock Option Agreement, dated April 1, 2010, and a second Stock Option Agreement, dated January 21, 2011. On June 12, 2014,
Standard Metals filed an Answer and a Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay or Transfer the action to the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division. On January 16, 2015, Standard Metals filed a Motion for
Summary Judgment. On January 23, 2015, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Standard Metals’ Motion
to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay or Transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Alabama, Middle Division. The Court in its Order stayed further proceedings in Colorado pending the issuance of orders by the
Alabama court. Thereafter, on January 26, 2015, the Court issued an Order vacating the February 20, 2015 Trial Preparation Conference
and the March 9, 2015 Bench Trial. On March 23, 2015, the Court issued an Order denying Standard Metals’ Motion for Summary
Judgment. On March 30, 2015, Flechner filed a Motion to Lift the Stay. On March 31, 2015, the Court issued an Order granting Flechner’s
Motion to Lift the Stay. On April 6, 2015, the Court issued an Order scheduling a Bench Trial for July 29, 2015. On April 9, 2015,
Flechner filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s March 23, 2015 Order Denying Flechner’s Motion to Enforce
the Confidential Settlement Agreement to Settle Certain Issues. On May 1, 2015, the Court issued an Order Granting Flechner’s
Motion to Enforce the Confidential Settlement Agreement to Settle Certain Issues. Standard Metals Processing, Inc. intends to
continue to vigorously defend against claims by Steven E. Flechner. On August 12, 2015 the United Stated District Court for the
District of Colorado issued a judgment in favor of Stephen E. Flechner for $2,157,000. An amended final judgment was ordered in
adjudication of the Complaint by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (the “Court”) on August 28,
2015 in favor of Flechner in the amount of $2,157,000, plus interest through the date of judgment of $235,246, plus interest of
$472.76/day from August 28, 2015 until paid in full. The Company, in good faith anticipation of a settlement did not appeal the
judgment and therefore, the Company’s notice of appeal was dismissed on November 17, 2015. This judgment is now non-appealable.
The Company has recognized the daily interest due from the date of the August 28, 2015 judgement through September 30, 2020 totaling
$921,882, resulting in a total amount of $3,314,128 being included in the Accrual for settlement of lawsuits relating to this
matter in the accompanying September 30, 2020 condensed consolidated balance sheet.
ITEM1A. RISK FACTORS
As
a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item. We note, however, that an investment
in our common stock involves a number of very significant risks. Investors should carefully consider the risk factors included
in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 as filed
with SEC on April 2, 2020, in addition to other information contained in such Annual Report and in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, in evaluating the Company and our business before purchasing shares of our common stock. The Company’s business, operating
results and financial condition could be adversely affected due to any of those risks.
Item2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020 options to purchase 2,750,000 shares and warrants to purchase 1,882,920 were exercised
at a reduced price of $0.023 per share consistent with the market price for the Company’s common stock. This exercise generated
$106,558 to be used in operations.
Item3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
Applicable.
Item5. Other Information
None.
Item6. Exhibits
| Exhibit<br><br><br> <br>Number | Description |
|---|---|
| (31) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
| 31.1* | Section 302 Certification under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Executive Officer |
| 31.2* | Section 302 Certification under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
| (32) | Section 1350 Certifications |
| 32.1* | Section 906 Certification under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer |
| 32.2* | Section 906 Certification under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Accounting Officer |
| (101)* | Interactive Data Files |
| 101.INS | XBRL<br><br> Instance Document |
| 101.SCH | XBRL<br><br> Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| 101.CAL | XBRL<br><br> Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| 101.DEF | XBRL<br><br> Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| 101.LAB | XBRL<br><br> Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| 101.PRE | XBRL<br><br> Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| * | Filed herewith. |
| --- | --- |
18
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC. | |
|---|---|
| By: | /s/ J. Bryan Read |
| J.<br><br> Bryan Read | |
| Chief<br><br> Executive Officer | |
| (Principal<br><br> Executive Officer) | |
| Date:<br><br> October 23, 2020 | |
| By: | /s/ Sharon Ullman |
| Sharon<br><br> Ullman | |
| Chief<br><br> Financial Officer | |
| (Principal<br><br> Financial Officer and<br><br><br> <br>Principal<br><br> Accounting Officer) | |
| Date:<br><br> October 23, 2020 |
19
Exhibit31.1
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO
SECTION302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
J. Bryan Read, certify that:
| 1. | I<br><br> have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Standard Metals Processing, Inc.; | |
|---|---|---|
| 2. | Based<br><br> on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary<br><br> to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect<br><br> to the period covered by this report; | |
| 3. | Based<br><br> on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all<br><br> material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods<br><br> presented in this report; | |
| 4. | The<br><br> registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and<br><br> procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting<br><br> (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |
| (a) | designed<br><br> such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,<br><br> to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to<br><br> us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
| (b) | designed<br><br> such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under<br><br> our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial<br><br> statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
| (c) | evaluated<br><br> the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions<br><br> about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based<br><br> on such evaluation; and | |
| (d) | disclosed<br><br> in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s<br><br> most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s<br><br> internal control over financial reporting; and | |
| 5. | The<br><br> registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control<br><br> over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors<br><br> (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
| (a) | all<br><br> significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which<br><br> are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial<br><br> information; and | |
| (b) | any<br><br> fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s<br><br> internal control over financial reporting. | |
| By: | /s/ J. Bryan Read | |
| --- | --- | |
| J. Bryan Read, Chief Executive Officer | ||
| (Principal Executive Officer) | ||
| Date: October 23, 2020 |
Exhibit 31.2
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO
SECTION302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
Sharon Ullman, certify that:
| 1. | I<br><br> have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Standard Metals Processing, Inc.; | |
|---|---|---|
| 2. | Based<br><br> on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary<br><br> to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect<br><br> to the period covered by this report; | |
| 3. | Based<br><br> on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all<br><br> material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods<br><br> presented in this report; | |
| 4. | The<br><br> registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and<br><br> procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting<br><br> (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |
| (a) | designed<br><br> such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,<br><br> to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to<br><br> us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
| (b) | designed<br><br> such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under<br><br> our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial<br><br> statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
| (c) | evaluated<br><br> the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions<br><br> about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based<br><br> on such evaluation; and | |
| (d) | disclosed<br><br> in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s<br><br> most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s<br><br> internal control over financial reporting; and | |
| 5. | The<br><br> registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control<br><br> over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors<br><br> (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
| (a) | all<br><br> significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which<br><br> are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial<br><br> information; and | |
| (b) | any<br><br> fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s<br><br> internal control over financial reporting. | |
| By: | /s/ Sharon Ullman | |
| --- | --- | |
| Sharon Ullman, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||
| Date: October 23, 2020 |
Exhibit32.1
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO
SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard Metals Processing, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on
the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.
| By: | /s/ J. Bryan Read |
|---|---|
| J. Bryan Read | |
| Chief Executive Officer | |
| (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| Date: October 23, 2020 |
Exhibit 32.2
STANDARDMETALS PROCESSING, INC.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO
SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard Metals Processing, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on
the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:
1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.
| By: | /s/ Sharon Ullman |
|---|---|
| Sharon Ullman | |
| Principal Accounting Officer | |
| Date: October 23, 2020 |