Call highlights
Avidbank reported Q2 2026 net income of $7.6 million ($0.71/diluted share), down from $9.0 million in Q1, as results included a $2.6 million litigation settlement charge and $1.3 million BOLI death benefit. Loan and deposit growth remained solid, with period-end loans up 9% annualized and period-end deposits up 22% annualized quarter-over-quarter.
“I think, again, targeting these low double digits is attainable. And everything we're seeing is pretty solid at this point for the second half of the year.”
“Originate-to-sale. So they're going to be focused on 7A production, and obviously we'll be selling – the goal is to sell the guaranteed portion of that.”
- Period-end loans grew $51.3 million (9% annualized) QoQ and $312.4 million (16%) YoY
- Period-end deposits grew $122.6 million (22% annualized) QoQ and $319.2 million (16%) YoY
- Book value per share increased $0.64 QoQ to $26.97
- Non-performing loans declined to 0.65% of total loans from 0.75% at March 31, 2026
- Launched new SBA Lending division led by Brian Harper, targeting government-guaranteed lending with an originate-to-sale strategy
- Added five senior revenue-generating bankers, growing total FTE count to 162 from 154
- Net income declined to $7.6 million from $9.0 million in Q1 2026
- Net interest margin compressed 12 bps to 4.26% from 4.38% in Q1, driven by higher deposit costs (+8 bps)
- Provision for credit losses jumped to $3.8 million from $1.4 million in Q1, driven by $1.9 million partial charge-off on a non-performing construction loan
- $2.6 million litigation settlement charge weighed on results
- Net charge-offs of 35 bps of average loans, with construction loan payoffs of $36 million continuing to offset growth
- Criticized and classified loans increased per management commentary
primarily by C&I and CRE. Our overall loan growth was offset by another $36 million in construction and land loans and payoffs. We've had consistent payoffs in construction over the past, going on 24 months at this point, and it just seems to be that time of the cycle. So I think we're getting close to bottoming out on that. We're going to continue to target low double-digit growth in loans and deposits, and we feel good about our positioning for the balance of the year. A big part of that positioning is talent. We ended the quarter with 162 full-time employees, up from 154 at the end of the first quarter. These additions include five senior revenue-generating bankers, as well as support functions spread across nearly all of our business lines. We continue to be able to attract experienced bankers from a number of other larger institutions to drive our growth. These investments will add some expense in the near term, but it's an investment in the future and the power of the bank. Additionally, as many of you saw, we announced the launch of our new SBA lending division. This is an important and natural expansion of our commercial lending platform. We have brought on an experience-purpose-built team led by Brian Harper, our new Managing Director of SBA Lending, who brings more than two decades of SBA experience, along with a full complement of business development, credit, and operations professionals. As most of you know, SBA Lending allows us to deliver government-guaranteed financing to help small and mid-sized businesses' owners fund growth, acquisitions, working capital equipment, and real estate. and it deepens the relationship-driven service that defines us. We are excited about the opportunity this creates for our clients as well as the franchise. With that, let me turn it over to Pat. I'll walk you through the quarter in more detail.
Thanks, Mark. Good morning, everyone. Let me start off with the margin. The net interest margin for the second quarter was 426, down 12 basis points from 438 in the first quarter, and in line with the guidance we provided last our meeting's call. That interest income was $26.7 million, up $181,000 from the first quarter, as higher average earning assets were partially offset by a lower FHLV dividend and higher deposit costs. Our loan yield was relatively flat at $667 compared to $668 in the first quarter. The cost of interest-rearing deposits rose 8 basis points to $306 from the increased deposit pricing pressure we experienced in Q1 and early Q2. The spot rate was $307,000 at June 30th, compared to $303,000 at March 31st, as deposit pricing pressure moderated times during the quarter. The provision for credit losses was $3.8 million, up from $1.4 million in the first quarter, driven primarily by the $1.9 million partial charge-offs on the non-performing construction loan. Net charge-offs were 35 basis points of average loans for the quarter. Non-performing loans declined to 65 basis points of total loans, down from 75 basis points at the end of the first quarter. And our allowance of credit losses was 97 basis points, an increase from 96 basis points in the first quarter. Non-interest income was $3.1 million, driven by the $1.3 million only death benefit proceeds. Excluding these proceeds, non-interest income was $1.7 million for the quarter, compared to $1.5 million in the first quarter. Non-interest expense was $16.5 million, including the $2.7 million litigation settlement. Excluding the settlement, core expenses decreased to $13.8 million from $14.1 million last quarter, primarily from lower credit-related legal and professional fees. Salary and benefits were flat at $9.6 million, as higher salary expense was offset by lower payroll taxes, lower bonus accruals, and higher capitalized loan enrichment costs. The increase in revenue and decrease in expenses helped push our efficiency ratio lower. The adjusted efficiency ratio was 48.7%, compared to 15.4% last quarter. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was 27%, and we expect it around the mid-27s range for the remainder of the year as we benefit from the tax-exempt holy debt benefit process. On capital, book value per share increased $0.64 to $26.97. Our capital ratios remain strong with a 2-to-1 leverage ratio of $11.50 and a total risk-based capital ratio of $12.79 at quarter end. With that, we'll be right back to Mark.
Thanks, Pat. And so I think we'll just open it up to questions at this point, because I'm sure there's going to be a few out there. So please.
At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Jerry Share, D.A. Davidson. Your line is open. you may go ahead.
Hey, good morning. It's Gary Tenner. I hope everybody's well. A couple of questions. I guess first on loan growth and Mark, you kind of alluded to the targeted in a low double-digit range. I mean, a lot of banks this quarter have kind of been coming off a strong second quarter, but maybe moderating or being a bit cautious in the back half. But if anything, it sounds like Outlook is in the back half of the year. So just love the moving parts there and both in the region.
You know, I think When you really break down where the growth has been coming from, it's coming from the business units primarily plus CRE. I think this construction landslide that we've had is, you know, this is the first time this has happened in this magnitude since we've been in business. And we're really talking about something between $250 and $300 million of payoffs in literally 24 months. So when you look at the pipelines of the other units, as well as construction for that mark, they're all pretty, pretty robust. I mean, I think Ventures Movement had a good quarter. I think C&I, our corporate banking division, is doing well. The pipelines are robust. I think there's a lot of confidence out there in the market in terms of overall business, as well as the local real estate market here on the peninsula in Northern California. has really rebounded substantially. It's now the fifth consecutive quarter of growth and absorption, and rents are finally starting to tick up a little bit. I mean, it still has a long way to go for a full recovery, but I think the confidence is pretty solid. So, you know, I'd like to, you know, we're always a second-half team, it seems. It seems like quarter two and quarter three, excuse me, quarter three and quarter four are always more significant than the first two quarters. And I don't like those cycles, but it's kind of where we are. So I think, you know, I think, again, targeting these low double digits is attainable. And everything we're seeing is pretty solid at this point for the second half of the year.
Thanks, Mark. And then I had a follow-up just on the deposit side of things. You know, last couple of quarters you've resumed utilization of brokered deposits to kind of augment the overall funding. So I'm just wondering, kind of maybe talk about, you know, where you see that going, Pat, and comfort levels with, you know, different, you know, the back half of the year loan growth is going to be that much stronger.
Yeah, so I think we put a lot of those brokered on in the first quarter and early in the second, and they're pretty short term. I think most of those, not all of them, but a good portion of them will mature this quarter. You know, if we continue to get pretty good deposit growth, the goal would be to kind of let that stuff run off. You know, we're in a pretty good spot now with the loan deposit ratios moved down. So if we continue this trend, you know, the goal is to have, you know, be core funded.
Okay, thank you.
Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Clark, Piper Sandler. Your line is now open. Go ahead.
Hey, this is Adam Kroll on for Matthew Clark. Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. Maybe starting off on the margin, Pat, I'd be curious to hear how you see the margin trending from here. And along with that, obviously, funding costs ticked up during the quarter, but maybe just the trajectory within funding costs as well.
Yeah, you know, the key drivers there probably are deposit growth and deposit costs. And, you know, obviously, we saw pretty big uptick in deposit costs. But like I said, I think that's moderating here. As you can see where the spot rate was at the end, you know, look, if you hold all the rate and look, loan yield is pretty stable. If you hold those rates steady and based on the balance sheet, how it ended up a quarter, the margin will be down primarily because we've got a lot more core funding. And, you know, the shift in the earning asset base based on that with more cash and the investment portfolio. So we'll see how it shakes out.
But I would not be surprised if we get the growth that we're continuing to expect, especially in a deposit type. um that that margin could turn down but hopefully interest income moves up nicely because of that so could move down as far as 420 yes got it i appreciate the color there and um you know just to follow up on that i guess in terms of um pricing on the asset side um specifically loan pricing um you know how has competition uh been there and how has it evolved over the last 90 days or so?
You know, on the C&I side, which most of it's floating rate, it's hanging in there. You know, we're a prime lender, and it's all prime, prime plus, most of it. And that really hasn't changed much. And on the commercial real estate side, obviously with the CPO curve, those rates are starting to tick up a little bit. So I think loan yields are hanging in there. That's where we're fairly confident we can keep that loan yield, you know, at least flattish going forward.
Got it. And then maybe moving to credit, I was wondering if you could provide some additional color on the non-owner occupied loan that drove the increase in criticized and just any potential timeline towards a resolution there.
Yes, this has been a longtime client of the bank, a longtime investor. There's some tie-in debt in three properties. One had a TCR covenant default, and we had to downgrade all three of them at that point. So I think it's going to be paid down and as well as work through over the next 24 months. So we're concerned because we always are, but we feel we're very well collateralized, and they're very low loan-to-values. And he's a proven operator.
Got it. Thanks for taking my questions. I'll step back.
Your next question comes from the line of Ross Haberman with RLH Investments. Your line is open. Go ahead.
Morning, gentlemen. Thanks for taking my call. Pat, just to follow up on the margin, if we do see – let's say we see a pickup in rates. They raise rates a quarter per point over the next couple of months or so. How does that scenario affect your margin or your spread?
It does benefit us. A little bit of probably not as much as we would see later. We do have some floors that are working through, so we'll limit some of the benefit on the loan side, but we still will obviously see our loan portfolio price up. I'm hoping, and the conversation we've had internally around deposit costs, is that we'll have to increase some of those deposit costs, obviously, for some of our clients. But hopefully we can limit that a little bit and we do get a little bit of benefit. The first 25, it's not going to be significant, right? But, you know, typically in those scenarios, you know, clients understand that we're not going to increase deposit costs significantly. So hopefully we get a little bit of benefit out of it.
And just one other question. Any other large expenditures expected in the next quarter or two? Do you think about any other branches or do you need to redo your data processing or anything like that in the next quarter or two? And any other sort of litigation sort of hanging out there like we saw this quarter that you're working on or potential liability like that?
Well, I think, you know, we are adding people. You know, after that successful offering that we had last year, one of the things in standard banker base, And so we have some opportunity out there to attract some talent, so keep tuned over the next few months. That's primarily the biggest area that could shift a little bit.
I got it. And on the potential contingent liabilities, anything else out there that you're working on or anything potentially out there that we should know about?
Uh, no, I think that's about all we can say about that at this point. Everything else is, you know, we've got some things behind us now with these, uh, with this quarter, and now it's about existing in the case quarter, um, real solid and take advantage of the opportunities that we've got out there with some of the discussion.
Thank you for your help, guys. The best of luck. Thank you.
Just a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of Tim Coffey with Breen Capital. Your line is open. Go ahead.
Great. Thank you. Morning, everybody. If I'm just reading through the tea leaves here, kind of your comments, is it reasonable to think that you feel pretty good about core deposit growth in the second half of the year?
I think we're always cautiously optimistic tim i think um i think we what we're seeing in our pipelines the amount of new clients and some of the initiatives that we're undertaking we feel we feel pretty pretty confident in the second half of the year to continue a solid trajectory in terms of both uh loan and deposit growth i wouldn't expect okay to go it's like we had the second quarter every quarter, right?
That was probably a little bit front-loaded, but ultimately we're still – the general trajectory is positive.
And then can you kind of talk about the operational goal for the SBA unit? Is that an originate-to-portfolio or originate-to-sale strategy?
Originate-to-sale. So they're going to be focused on 7A production, and obviously we'll be selling – the goal is to sell the guaranteed portion of that. Okay.
Any plans for the end of 504?
So we do some 504 already. And any 504s that we do, we hold. But that's not going to be a significant piece of the business. And we'll continue to do that selectively, yes.
Okay, great. And then, Mark, if I could kind of, you know, get your thoughts on the construction cycle that you're in. How do you see it? Because I can see, you know, both sides of the coin on construction loan payoffs, both the good and the bad. How are you seeing it?
Well, I think there's a lot of these payoffs, this landslide, if you will, the amount and volume is a lot of maybe last year was a lot of COVID hangover. Some of the delays that took place at these things, they didn't start the project until much later and they did or they were delays due to COVID in terms of in terms of the workers. So I think when you really look at what our core business is, which are special single family homes, that has been really holding up pretty consistently as it has over the last 20 years. I think, you know, we've done a lot of these mixed use things over time and we've been pretty successful at it. two big hiccups we had over the last four years or so has been both of those were mixed-use projects. And I think we're looking at those things a little bit differently going forward. That's a very challenging collateral to perfect. And I think the retail value really has nothing to do with our loan to value when we're going into those things as we've experienced when things have been a little bit challenged. I think the bulk value is a key thing. So So are we shifting our underwriting a little bit? I think we're tightening those things up. But I think we're still pretty bullish on our core business, which are the single-family spec homes, because that's a real commodity here in the Bay Area. It's, you know, we've had zero losses over 20 years being in that space. So this charge that we just took is the first charge we've ever taken in our construction portfolio. later. So, you know, when you go through these kind of cycles, you kind of look at, you know, what's worked well for us, where have we gotten some drift, and, you know, kind of getting back to what our niche really is, our V-spec homes, we're going to focus primarily on that.
Okay. Okay. Great. That's great, Connor. Thank you. And then if you kind of get your thoughts on the market disruption, you talked about it a little bit. Obviously, the most disruption in your footprint in the last three years, but this one seems a little bit different. This one seems like it has more opportunity for a bank your size and your strategy. Am I reading that correctly?
Short answer, yes. I think most recently it has been, and there's going to be some more disruption as it was announced earlier this week. And it does center primarily around talent, which equates to clients later. And so, you know, as you know, whenever there's these merger sales that it works, it works for a certain portion of the of the bankers and the management of the of the of the target bank. But when when the bankers are disrupted in the local market, the clients are disrupted as well. So so I think we're going to take advantage of both to the best we can. And we've always been selective in our talent. And I think we've been pretty consistent in our employee retention. People know that in the local market. So, you know, we're getting some opportunity that we would not ordinarily get for sure.
Right.
Okay. Great.
Those are my questions. Thank you very much.
I would like to turn the call back over to the presenters.
Well, again, as I said at the beginning, we do appreciate your interest and support. and just if you have any further questions, please reach out to Pat or me. We'll be happy to give you any color we can. So appreciate your time and interest.
This concludes today's conference call.
You may now disconnect.