Axis Capital Holdings Ltd Q2 FY2025 Earnings Call

Good day, and welcome to the AXIS Capital Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Clifford Gallant, Head of Investor Relations and Corporate Development. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to our second quarter 2025 Conference Call. Our earnings press release and financial supplement were issued last night. If you would like copies, please visit the Investor Information section of our website at axiscapital.com. We set aside an hour for today's call, which is also available as an audio webcast on our website. Joining me on today's call are Vincent Tizzio, our President and CEO; and Pete Vogt, our CFO. In addition, I would like to remind everyone that statements made during this call, including the question-and-answer session, which are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Actual events or results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including the risk factors set forth in the company's most recent report on the Form 10-K or our quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other reports the company files with the SEC. This includes the additional risks identified in the cautionary note regarding the forward-looking statements in our earnings press release issued last night. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. In addition, our non-GAAP financial measures may be discussed during this conference call. Reconciliations are included in our earnings press release and financial supplement. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Vince.

Thank you, Cliff. Good morning, and thank you for joining our call. This was an excellent quarter for AXIS, as we continue to build on our sustained positive momentum while achieving record performance across a range of indices. I'll begin by sharing several AXIS Group results. We delivered an annualized operating return on equity of 19% in the quarter, record diluted book value per common share of $70.34, up 18.6% year-over-year. Operating earnings per share was an all-time high of $3.29, a 12% increase over the prior year quarter. We produced record second quarter premiums of $2.5 billion, including $732 million in new business, and we generated a combined ratio of 88.9%. Catastrophe events in the second quarter approximated an industry loss of $25 billion, and AXIS continued to manage its volatility profile by having just over 0.1 point of market share loss. We are delivering strong results in a market that remains impacted by uncertainty stemming from trade disruption, tariffs, and geopolitical tensions, all of which can lead to inflation, rising loss costs, and impediments to growth. Notwithstanding, we continue to lean into the strategy that we shared with you at our Investor Day. Let's now dig deeper into the performance of our segments, and we'll start with Insurance. Our Insurance segment again delivered an outstanding quarter, highlighted by a current accident year ex cat combined ratio of 83.2% and an overall combined ratio of 85.3%, record premium production of $1.9 billion, highlighted by 6.5% top line growth and $641 million in new premiums written with new business pricing achieving our hurdle rates. Net written premium grew 8.1% in the quarter, and we generated underwriting income of $152 million, our highest on record. In North America, we produced exceptional financial results with premiums up 8% over the prior year quarter. Submissions were up more than 22% and produced further improvements in our underwriting metrics against our quote, bind, and policy service standards. Of note, our new and expanded product offerings continue to deliver productivity gains, including sustained growth in our lower middle market business. In our Global Market division, we continue to observe competitive market conditions, particularly in property. Our focus remains on selective growth, which in the quarter included our A&H and renewable energy businesses. We'll now discuss broader market conditions within insurance. We are competing across a series of micro markets, each with their own risk dynamics. In this environment, we are continuing to maintain premium adequacy across our aggregated portfolio, as we cycle manage where needed while also leaning into attractive business lines. It is our observation that the market broadly continues to be disciplined and rational, albeit competitive. But as mentioned at our Investor Day, we remain bottom line-focused and target business that meets our risk-adjusted return thresholds. Let's unpack this further. In Casualty, rates were up 12% in the quarter. We generated 14% increases in both rate and growth within our U.S. excess Casualty business. U.S. Primary Casualty rates increased by 12.5%. With respect to property, we produced flat to low single-digit growth with an 11% rate reduction overall. The go-to-market, with eight underwriting units spread across the globe, is seeing varying degrees of competition and we benefit from the diversity of our customer segmentation in these units. Our portfolio remains highly premium adequate, maintains an average net limit in the low single digits, is well balanced in peril and geographic mix, and has treaty protection that attaches at $100 million per event. In Professional, we grew 15%. Our investment in new and enhanced products, including design professionals, Allied Health, and Environmental, are bearing fruit as these lines are now consistently contributing to our growth. 50% of the growth in Professional came from E&O. We will continue to execute on our stated management liability product strategy ex public D&O. Finally, we would observe that D&O public pricing was virtually flat in the quarter, indicating that the potential floor has been reached. With respect to cyber, the industry is navigating an evolving risk landscape where AI is enabling more sophisticated attacks with heightened frequency of midsized ransomware losses. Even with this loss activity, pressure in pricing has continued and is particularly acute from MGAs. Within the Access portfolio, our underwriting standards remain vigilant and help insurers protect themselves from ransomware matters. As previously reported, we continue to execute the reshaping of our cyber portfolio. In the quarter, we reduced our delegated Cyber book by $35 million and remain on track to complete this work by the end of the third quarter. We continue to invest in analytic capabilities to help inform our risk selection. We'll now move to reinsurance. We again delivered positive bottom line results as we maintained our commitment to generate consistent profitability and low volatility. In the quarter, we produced a combined ratio of 92%, underwriting income of $38 million, and specialty short-tail lines, a key area of our focus, contributed 37% of our book premiums in the quarter with attractive returns. Our underwriting strategy in reinsurance is highly disciplined. As I've commented previously, we remain selective in professional and even more so than liability, particularly in North America, where despite positive rate momentum, ceding commissions are not commensurate with our portfolio progress. A number of our cedents have begun enhancing their underwriting and claim processes. The progress observed will take time to be evident, and as such, we are managing our exposure in this line. Taken together, across our businesses, we're pleased with our sustained progress, underpinned by our ability to cycle manage, identify profitable growth pockets, and leverage our global product platform while providing value to our distribution partners. Enabling our progress, we continue to make investments in our business through our 'How We Work' program. By example, in the quarter, we further advanced the modernization of our underwriting pipeline while leveraging emerging technology and AI. This includes enhancing our North American underwriting platform with several AI-powered services, deploying automated clearance capabilities to facilitate more straight-through processing and augmenting underwriting decision-making by leveraging third-party data to build a deeper understanding of our insurers. In closing, I remain highly encouraged by the consistent positive trends in our performance and the momentum that we've built. Underlying our strong execution is a focused and disciplined underwriting culture, a resilient and well-diversified book of business, and an exceptionally skilled team. We believe we are very well positioned in the market, and we see ample opportunity for continued profitable growth as we leverage our specialty capabilities to help our customers navigate a dynamic risk environment. Finally, I'll extend my gratitude to my AXIS teammates for their outstanding efforts as we together help our company realize its specialty leadership aspiration. I'll now pass the floor to Pete for his comments.

Thank you, Vince, and good morning, everyone. AXIS had another excellent quarter. Our net income available to common shareholders was $216 million or $2.72 per diluted common share. Our operating income was $261 million or $3.29 per diluted common share, producing a 19% annualized operating return on common equity. This drove our book value per diluted common share to $70.34 at June 30, an increase of 18.6% over the past 12 months. I'll start with consolidated company underwriting highlights. Our gross premiums written of $2.5 billion were up 3.1% over the prior year quarter, with accelerating growth initiatives in insurance partially offset by an expected decline in reinsurance. Our combined ratio was excellent at 88.9%, and our accident year loss ratio ex cat and weather was 56.4%. Cat losses were just $37 million, producing a cat loss ratio of 2.6%. Cat losses were primarily driven by severe convective storms in the United States. We adhere to our philosophy of wanting to see sustained positive signals before releasing reserves, and we recorded a release of $20 million from the short-tail lines with $15 million in insurance and $5 million in reinsurance. Our consolidated G&A ratio, including corporate, was 11.6%, up slightly from 11.4% a year ago, as we had one-time costs related to severance and made information technology investments in the quarter. In the prior year quarter, we had a below-the-line charge for reorganization expenses which included similar type costs. The investments we're making give us increased confidence that we will hit our full year 2026 target of an 11% G&A ratio. Now let's move on and discuss our segment results in more detail. Insurance had a strong quarter. Gross premiums written were $1.9 billion, a record quarter for insurance and an increase of 7% compared to the prior year quarter. Excluding the remediations in cyber, growth was just under 9%. As we told you before, we expect to complete the cyber remediation in the third quarter with approximately $20 million to $25 million remaining. Property remains a very attractively priced book, but there are growing rate pressures. As you can see, we held the line with just 1% growth. As we have noted, we have a diversified property book spanning eight product lines. In the quarter, E&S property and global property were both down, but offset by other products, most notably renewable energy and U.K. property. Liability is where rate momentum is strongest, and we reported 17% growth with particular strength in U.S. Excess Casualty. As Vince mentioned, in pro lines, we had 15% growth driven by new and expanded products, including Allied Health and Environmental, and the 25% growth in A&H was driven by our pet product. Net written premiums were up 11%, excluding A&H, which has a new quota share for the pet product. Our net written premium growth is exceeding our gross premium growth due to decreased session rates as we retain more of the risks we know and like. Overall, we're very happy with where we are positioned today as the pricing cycle advances. We're largely through remediation and some of the investments we've made in product development are beginning to gain traction. Driven by our enhanced product and service offerings, we expect new business growth to continue to be strong, and with fewer headwinds from remediation, we may see growth in the second half of the year higher than the 6% we saw in the first six months of the year. To echo Vince, we are just beginning to seize the mantle as a global specialty leader. The insurance combined ratio was an outstanding 85.3%. The quarter included 3.6 points of cat and weather-related losses and 1.5 points of reserve releases from short-tail lines. Now let's move on to the reinsurance segment, where the business is continuing to deliver stable, consistent, and strong profitability. The second quarter typically is about 1/4 of our annual premium volume. Gross premiums were down 6.8%, due in part to timing issues but also our underwriting discipline. For example, North America liability premiums were down 17%, but exposures were down 28% as we've held back despite getting rate increases in this line. Growth areas have been in some highly profitable areas of credit and surety. For the full year, we expect flat to low single-digit premium growth. The reinsurance combined ratio was 92% with an ex cat accident year loss ratio of $67.9. Cats were just 0.1 point with 1.4 points of benefit from the reserve releases. As we discussed when we reported last quarter, we are taking a cautious stance in booking our reinsurance loss ratio something we expect to continue to do. We had a very good quarter for investment income at $187 million. The big thing in the quarter was the movement of approximately $2 billion out of cash for the closing of the LPT transaction. Please note that since the LPT closed towards the end of April, there was a $4 million to $5 million benefit in net investment income from cash in the quarter that won't be repeatable. For our alternatives, we had another better-than-expected quarter. It benefited from FX, and we would once again say that the quarter's result is about double what we would expect on a more normal run rate. Our outlook for investment income remains favorable as we continue to generate excellent operating cash flow, and the market yield of 5% is above our 4.6% book yield as of June 30. Our effective tax rate of 20.1% in the quarter reflects the geographic mix of our profits. As a reminder, Bermuda is now a 15% corporate tax rate jurisdiction. We expect the full year tax rate to be in the high teens. Despite the gyrations of the financial markets, we remain in a very strong capital position. The priority for capital is to advance our strategic goals. In the first half of the year, we executed on that priority by funding growth opportunities, including the hiring of new teams and by investing in our digital and analytical capabilities. We also have returned substantial capital to our shareholders this year, and despite not being too far off our all-time highs, we are opportunistically buying back our stock, which we view to be a very attractive use of capital today. In the quarter, we completed $50 million of share repurchases and declared $35 million in common dividends. We have $110 million remaining on our repurchase authorization. While 2025 has been headlined by turbulent financial markets, AXIS's results have been stable, consistent, and at record levels. We have spent considerable effort over the past two years under Vince's leadership to make AXIS a stronger, better, more valuable company. We've invested in talent, built out our product offering, improved our service capabilities, navigated some painful re-underwriting, strengthened our reserve and capital positions, and executed on the 'How We Work' program all to make AXIS faster and more effective while being more expense-efficient. While we are cognizant of the pricing cycle, we believe that challenging times will suit us well and give us the opportunity to truly separate ourselves from the pack. With that, we'd be happy to take your questions.

And the first question will come from Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen.

My first question is about the insurance segment, where gross written premiums increased by 6.5% and net written premiums rose by 8% due to lower session rates. I noticed that approximately a third of your written premium growth is ceded. How do you view sessions in the coming years? A third is a substantial amount to cede. Do you anticipate that reduction to be significant? How much do you expect it to decrease?

Andrew, this is Vince. Look, broadly speaking, our reinsurance strategy is a composite of many factors. As you know, as a specialist, given the breadth of our product offering and the customer segmentation we are aiming to pursue and penetrate, our strategy will remain agile. In the last couple of years, we've repositioned our reinsurance purchase strategy to comport with our view of risk, the internal capabilities that are enhancing our underwriting risk selection, the increased capital position of our company, and the ability to manage our expenses in a manner that's different from our historical path. While I won't predict the next several years, what I will say expressly is that you should expect our reinsurance purchase strategy to remain agile, flexible, and to comport with our view of risk and all the other factors that we take into account, as I mentioned, capital, certainly expenses, and our view of risk. I would say at the moment, as I've said previously, we have high confidence in the insurance segment business generally. As you know, this quarter, with the exception of our cyber business, each of our businesses grew. We are pleased with both the financial results and more specifically to your question, we're comfortable with our current reinsurance purchase strategy. We won't predict the future as you highlight in a number of years, but what I would say is, remember, we'll be flexible and comport our strategy to our underwriting view of risk.

That sounds very thoughtful. And then, just shifting over to reinsurance. I note that the accident year loss ratio went to 68% from 64.5%. You've highlighted a cautious stance on reserving given uncertainty in the environment. Do you feel like the loss ratio now and the reserving process is where you want it to be going forward? Or is there a chance that you could get increasingly conservative given what we're seeing with social inflation?

Yes. Thank you. I'll start and Pete certainly can come in over me. First, please observe that this ratio, this loss ratio is fairly consistent with what Pete guided to in the first quarter. As it relates to our reserve position, obviously, we take very active management and a consistent philosophy around our reserving. As I noted in my prepared remarks, Andrew, within casualty, liability, North America, in particular, we remain highly selective, highly prudent, and we are observing, as I observed the ceding commission levels not being commensurate. So what I think you can infer is we'll probably hold around the 68% certainly through the balance of 2025. More broadly, as you know, within reinsurance, this is a very clear mandate from our leadership that runs the business. This is a bottom line-focused business unit. They are certainly resisting the temptation of a number of opportunities to gross line the business. 37-odd percent of the premium came from our short-tail specialty lines. We feel very good about the execution of that team. We're highly observant about the changing risk landscape in North America, particularly in liability. I don't know, Pete, if you want to come over the top of that.

No. I think you said it well, Vince. I would say we're very consistent with what we did in the first quarter where we did move up some loss picks in our specialty lines. We've held that in the second quarter. On our casualty lines, we've been very consistent for the last year and we haven't really changed our view of risk there right now. So I would expect it to stay right around that level for the rest of the year, Andrew.

Your next question will come from Charlie Lederer with BMO Capital Markets.

So Vince, you pointed out the diverse series of markets AXIS is faced with today. Can you help us understand whether the pricing is ahead of loss cost in insurance? And then separately, the same question for reinsurance.

Yes. I think what I would say, Charlie, first, is that we are continuing to observe a changing rate landscape environment, clearly, in the line of focus, certainly liability and casualty, we comfortably are pricing well ahead of trend. As you know from our financial results, the property environment has driven our short-tail line pricing deterioration in relevant part. Having said that, as I noted in my opening remarks, the premium adequacy of the aggregate portfolio remains excellent.

And I guess just my follow-up. So looking at Page 18 of the supplement, I'm wondering just with all the changes in mix, if you could unpack what we're seeing in terms of paid loss and IBNR trends in the Insurance segment.

Yes, happy to. Thank you. So first of all, this business, as you know, has been growing reasonably well over the last couple of years. Secondly, and more particularly in the quarter, we had a number of over-year claim payments made that certainly added to the paid to incurred ratio. Third, as you know, this ratio can be quite noisy from quarter to quarter. We observe it over a continuum of time. I think importantly, our conservative reserving approach and methodology will remain consistent. The underlying metrics that we're observing through a variety of tools that we use remain favorable in our point of view. Finally, consistent with our 'How We Work' program, we've made a number of investments in our claims organization, processes, people, tools, all of which aims toward a more effective and efficient claims process. We look through those numbers with an observant eye, just as you do, and we feel very comfortable with why the numbers are what they are. Pete, I don't know if you want to come in over the top.

The only thing I'd add is a couple of things. When you're looking at that just in the quarter, as Vince mentioned, there is some, I'll call it, volatility that can happen from quarter to quarter. But we did have some larger older claims get paid in the quarter. I would also note that we paid out a fair amount of our wildfire claims from the first quarter and the second quarter, which was really good as our claims people got those payments to our clients very quickly, because they're in definite need of that. We did see an uptick in our wildfire claims, and that came through in the second quarter, too. But to your point, to Vince's point, it's a metric that we look at and digest every quarter and make sure that it's in line with our expectations and understand any differences. Overall, our A to E is tracking as expected this year, and our overall reserve process remains very, very consistent.

Got it. And if I could just sneak one more in. Just on the expense ratio in insurance. I guess the trends kind of changed up a little bit as far as the acquisition cost start to move down, while it was going up previously and the opposite on the G&A side. Can you help us understand what drove that and whether we should expect that to continue in the back half?

Yes, this is Pete. I'll handle that, Charlie. On the G&A ratio, I think you're just looking at the quarter-to-quarter last year, I would remind everyone, we did take a restructuring charge. There were some expenses that were put below the line with that. So I would look more year-to-date. If you look year-to-date, the G&A ratio for insurance is actually down about 0.5 points, and that is going in the right direction. Overall, we feel good about where we are and we're on track to hit our 11% next year for the entire company. So I'd say that overall. For insurance generally, the acquisition cost is down a little bit. I would expect it to still be in that high 19s, right around 20% for the rest of the year. It's down a bit because we're getting some better ceding commissions on our quota shares. As we renewed our quota shares, we're getting good ceding commissions. Additionally, we have a little bit less as we've talked about cyber; we got out of some of our MGA relationships. That's actually helping on the acquisition cost there a little bit.

I think the bumpers there, Pete, is one, we're both affirming our '26 GA target. Secondly, we're doing exactly as we said, we're continuing to invest in the business. It will move. It will gyrate I think is the word Pete used in the past from quarter to quarter. We're very pleased with the progression of our GA target.

The next question will come from Andrew Andersen with Jefferies.

We've heard some discussion around MGAs this quarter, just around pricing. Maybe you could talk about AXIS' approach to MGAs, maybe how that's changed and where you see your appetite there?

Andrew, it's Vince. Well, certainly, since the charge back in December 2023, we have put in place a renewed underwriting strategy with respect to MGAs. For context, our organization in the quarter had about 30-odd percent of the premium coming from MGAs. It is a highly selective, highly disciplined strategy. I would comment in North America, which has had the brunt of the change in the philosophy of use. The leadership there has a very defined strategy that is complementary to our overall underwriting strategy. In North America, it's about 14% of our business in the second quarter. We see a competitive use of MGAs under select circumstances. We equally observe some of the challenges that they present in classes like cyber and in property where often we're not seeing commensurate pricing that we think is worthy of competing with. We have a more fulsome value proposition, right? We're an underwriting organization with a dedicated claims organization and infrastructure to support our underwriters and the view of risk that we have. So the bumper sticker is, our strategy within MGAs is certainly bottom line focused, alignment of interest in any of those instances that we use MGAs. On the competitive landscape side, we observe them very carefully, and we have not competed on price in many instances, and we are willing to trade for bottom line over volume, and that is the approach that we'll continue to execute against in our company.

On the reinsurance side, we are maintaining some discipline, and I don't believe you are alone in your perspective. Where do we currently stand with cedents enhancing their underwriting and claims? Are we just getting started, or are we further along? What additional progress would make you more interested in reinsurance liability growth?

This is a subject that Anne and the team and I, we talk about a lot. I think that we see mid-innings, but it's hard to attach an overall because, as you know, we're a pick your partner underwriting company in reinsurance. The team works deliberately and earnestly to understand the evolving changes that are going on within the underlying cedents' portfolios. The interaction model and communication is vibrant. I would say you'd have to acknowledge if you look at the cumulative environment since '24, the number of companies that have taken action in strengthening their liability reserves. It stands to reason that there's comfort that needs to be evident in a statistically repeatable way before we think the trade is worth leaning into. At the moment, we just don't feel it as a general matter. That doesn't mean we won't selectively grow, but we're going to pick our partner. We're going to look at the trade and the balance of fairness and accuracy, and we want to see the evidence of the changes that are being spoken about, revealed in our interactions. That will come through both data and our oral communications with our cedents. So that's the course that we're going to stay.

The next question will come from Josh Shanker with Bank of America.

The first question is about the DTA. There are a couple of points to discuss. First, some of the value was reduced in the quarter in a non-operating way. Second, I want to clarify how much of your incurred taxes are expected to be paid in cash versus through the DTA. Could you explain how that process works?

So Josh, this is Pete. I'll take that for you. When we put up the DTA last year in 2024, we decided to take it as a non-operating item because it was something that really wasn't germane to the operations, and we didn't want to gyrate operating income with a huge benefit in 2024 due to putting that up. When you go to Page 16 of our press release, and we're reconciling from net income to operating income, as we amortize that back down, we're actually pulling it out and just pointing it into non-operating so we can be consistent. You'll see that on the chart, and you'll see that every quarter. So we can just give you full disclosure as to what that aspect is.

What exactly is amortizing down? I'm trying to understand that. Apologies.

Well, I guess I would say we put up, at the end of last year, $176 million, and that actually amortizes that deferred tax asset, Josh, will amortize to zero for the most part over the next 10 years. That's what happens. As that amortizes down, that will count as part of our effective tax rate for Bermuda, but that amount will actually not be paid in cash to Bermuda.

So in any given quarter, you're not paying taxes based on your tax obligation, you're using to pay tax based on the amortization rate.

Yes, we're paying tax based on our effective tax rate, yet with the cash, the portion of that ETR that is the amortization is not cash. You can see that now at $3.4 million in the second quarter.

Okay. And what about the risk that there's something that changes if you're doing this slow amortization? Was there any way to accelerate the amortization with how much tax you paid this year given that maybe next year, the agreement with the global tax body won't allow you to use the DTA?

Yes. Currently, we are aware that the OECD has permitted the first two years. I don't want to speculate beyond that since it will depend on future legislation, and any comments I make would be pure guesswork. Regarding the tax law that was enacted, it consists of four components that generally amortize over a 10-year span. I am generalizing, as there are a few elements that have slightly longer or shorter periods, but primarily, it falls within that 10-year timeframe. We'll have to wait and see what unfolds as we approach 2027.

And then my other question, I wanted to follow up on Charlie's a little bit, and I really appreciate you taking in the minutia. Some people wouldn't have patience for this. The paid to current insurance did go up by a lot. I understand you had a couple of large payments for older accident years and the California wildfire. Can we put some numbers and for the two other claims some categories around this just to understand, it is a big move in the paid-to-incurred. Usually, I wouldn't belabor it does jump around quarter to quarter as it should, but maybe like it might appease the concern about the higher paid-to-incurred for the more we know.

Josh, I'll start, and then Pete can add on top. First, again, we had a number of older year claims, including the wildfires. So there were certainly a contribution in that regard of 5 or 7-point against the 89. Secondly, you know through our 'How We Work' program, the effectiveness and efficiency is revealing itself throughout our operating model. Clearly, our claims organization is one of the entities benefiting from those changes. They're introducing heightened skills and capabilities, more technology. This will add to the effectiveness and the efficiency from quarter to quarter. That may reveal itself in paid-to-incurred ratios. In other instances, it may reveal itself in other ways that are value-added to our insurers and to our brokers. There is nothing beyond that that I would say. Pete, if there's something additional for you, please share it.

It would be difficult to get into specifics. I would say there were some specific large claims. When I think about the SEC classes, Josh, I'd say that some of them came out of the marine and aviation class and some of them came out of the pro lines class from years ago. But I really wouldn't want to get into specific claimants and dollars of claims that were paid. It really came out of those two classes, I guess, is what I'd say.

Your next question will come from Brian Meredith with UBS.

So the first one, I'm just curious. If I look at the share buyback in the quarter, it looks like you didn't buy back any stock in June. I'm just curious if there was a reason for that. Maybe talk a little bit about what your AXIS capital position is currently and kind of plans for that? I know share buyback is obviously kind of top of the list.

Brian, this is Pete. What I will tell you is, I remind you, we tend to be opportunistic when it comes to share buyback, and we'll buy back when we feel that it's appropriate. We did have a plan in place for May; we didn't continue it into June. I would not read anything into it. As I said, we were just being opportunistic in the quarter with what we saw going on. As we went into the end of the quarter, we saw good growth. We made investments in technology, data, and analytics. We continue to put our capital to use in growing organically our business and also in building out our platform for future growth. Overall, I'd say we have $110 million left in our share repurchase authorization. I think you should think of us as continuing to be opportunistic with the use of that share buyback. I don't know if you want to add on to that, Vince.

No, I think the only thing to contribute is one, we added some new teams in North America in the quarter. Secondly, you've said historically, we're opportunistic. We are. We're comfortable with our capital position. We made investments in the operating model, Brian, that we're really pleased with the progression. Our company has moved almost virtually to the cloud through technology at this point. So there's a lot going on in the 'How We Work' program.

Yes. Overall, I know you asked for a specific number, Brian. We typically don't give that out, but I would say that our capital position remains very strong, and we continue to feel good about what that capital position is and where it is to fund our future growth.

Yes. So this is an initiative that you know we've been talking about for some period of time. In the sizing of the business, in the quarter, depending upon how you define lower middle market from our prior discussions, we grew our wholesale LMM business about $64 million in the quarter. That's what we wrote out of that three dedicated products. More broadly, the lower middle market strategy aims to identify every product within our North American franchise that's transactional. Transactional for us has a very specific meaning. We're well underway with regard to isolating the lines of business that are defined by LMM, generally a turnover or revenue, as we say, in America, defined risk attribute. This is generally lower complex business, high transactional volume. Secondly, this business from an investment perspective is well on its way. It's one of the cornerstone 'How We Work' investments through the modernization of our underwriting platform. We're in the lower innings of that. We're not at the fifth inning yet, but we're making pace. The diagnostics that we secured in the third quarter through two AI vendors last year are helping us in our growth trajectory. At the end of 2024, this is about a $400-odd million business in the aggregate. We feel continued momentum and continued focus. Finally, I would note that the submission volume in this unit is off the charts. The team has done an excellent job at attracting value to our brand, value in our service proposition, which we believe is a distinctive advantage. We have high expectancy for this business and its continuance of profitable growth. We have continued investment that Mike and Ann are ensuring is aiding our underwriters in our aspiration for a straight-through process.

Next question will come from Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo.

My first question is on the insurance premium growth. I think you guys said that the second half might be higher than the 6% in the first half. I know there's a little bit of cyber remediation, right, $20 million to $25 million, right, for Q3. But given that we're through the bulk of the remediation, I'm just surprised. Would it just feel like with some of the initiatives, et cetera, that growth the second half should be greater than the first half? Or is there some, I guess, conservatism built into that kind of the guide that you guys gave?

Elyse, this is Vince. First of all, we'll conclude the cyber remediation in the third quarter. Secondly, what Pete and I had indicated in the first quarter was mid-single-digit growth for the insurance business for the full year. We're optimistic about continuing to achieve profitable growth. I think we grew 1.5 points quarter-over-quarter in the business between 1Q, and 2Q. We do have expectancy of continuing our profitable growth, and we like the degree of growth that's delivered here in the second quarter, and we'll remain focused on delivering where we can.

And I guess I would just add on, maybe I wasn't clear in my comments, Elyse. I think, I did say that the second half of the year should be better than the 6% we've seen year-to-date.

Okay. My second question is about the upcoming wind season and the potential losses it could create in the property market, as well as in primary and reinsurance. You exited that business years ago, so I'm wondering if there’s a significant market shift, like a major event that impacts the cat market this year, would you ever consider reentering? Or is that possibility completely off the table for the company?

We'll be excited in such an event to help our insurance team go after the opportunity that will undoubtedly be revealed and certainly and most likely come into our wholesale E&S business and the team in North America stands ready. So the direct answer is no, we think our profile and the value creation journey that Pete, and the ExCo, and I are on is situated perfectly, and we're comfortable with our underwriting strategy.

No. You finish first.

Yes. No, I would just observe to you, look at the property business within AXIS, look at the order of growth, look at the comments that Pete and I have attributed to the profitability of that business, the portfolio construct of that business, the channel in which we, at least in the United States, transact, which is the largest of our eight underwriting divisions. So we feel comfortable that we're not leaving the opportunity on the table. We're seeking it and seeking it in a very decided way. Thank you.

And then one last quick one. Was there any adverse, if any, that you guys had from the U.K., Russia aviation ruling in the quarter?

No. So Elyse, this is Pete. As we articulated in the past, we do not play in that contingent war market. We're in the all-perils market, and so the rulings really came down well for us. It's what we expected, what the market did expect. The short answer is no, there was no impact on us in the quarter.

The next question is a follow-up from Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen.

Yes. Vince, in your prepared remarks, you talked a little bit about in reinsurance some of your cedents were evolving their claims processes. I was wondering if you could elaborate on that a bit.

Well, certainly, all I could say broadly is that, Andrew, as a result of the strengthening that you saw last year across a number of different companies, there's no doubt that all underwriting companies are taking stock of their claim organizations evaluating a whole variety of things. That kind of communication is vibrant with us in our reinsurance business, and we'll remain observant to it. I won't cite cedents, but broadly, it's not as though that the strengthening taken across the industry goes silent in these underwriting organizations. They take stock of how they're coming to market, how they're managing their own claims organizations. Hopefully, that answers your question.

Yes, it does. And then you talked quite a bit on the call about your investments in AI and other technologies. I think I heard you in the Q&A, Vince, talk about being like the fifth inning. When you look over your shoulder at the competition, where do you see AXIS in the scope of AI and other technology? Do you feel like you're far in front, middle of the pack? How are you seeing your investments and how you're doing versus the competition?

Yes. Outside of the public comments that are offered, I really don't know where the competition is beyond that. But what I do know is the Compass and the strategy of AXIS is rightsized in its ambition. Recall, please, first, we have an efficiency and productivity aspiration in the utilization of AI. Secondly, we have a vibrant set of use cases in our organization that range between our corporate legal function all the way up to the front end of the company. Third, we have an investment set of strategies that aims to optimize our aspiration of achieving more profitable growth in lower middle market, enabling a more straight-through process capability in our company generally. Finally, to take advantage of the investments we've made in the provision of our data and analytics, our Chief Data Officer, who works with our Chief Underwriting Officer, has made considerable progress and is enabling our front end to make better risk selections, and we think that will translate into a sustained profitable growth run rate, certainly in the balance of 2025. Taken together, we're pleased with the progress that we're making. We think it's rightsized to a mid-cap specialty underwriter. We have a number of tests going on against our hypotheses to challenge whether we will achieve the efficiency and productivity gains. I would tell you that if you look at the discrete 2Q North American quote, bind, turnaround time, they are being materially enhanced, and they are being aided. I won't say they're being driven by, but they're certainly being aided by those investments. I think the North American leadership has a very active posture at making sure that they get the kind of benefits that we expect from both technology and more broadly, AI.

Your next question will come from Meyer Shields with KBW.

Vince, I was hoping you could talk about the loss trend that you're seeing in the professional liability lines that you're writing now?

Yes. Well, firstly, remember, for the SEC class for AXIS, there's a lot of different products in there. It's a combination of short-tail and longer-tail. To put a bumper sticker on it, we're seeing low single-digit trend in that business. Obviously, if you talk about public, we would take that out. But it's a panoply of a lot of different products in that bucket. It ranges between errors and omissions, management liability, environmental classes, and certainly public D&O and even IPO D&O as well.

I want to emphasize again that public D&O has become a very small part of our insurance portfolio due to pricing trends over the last few years. As Vince pointed out, it seems that pricing may be reaching a low point. We will see how this area develops in the future. Currently, it constitutes a minor segment, so it did not contribute to the growth we experienced in pro lines this quarter.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to our CEO, Vincent Tizzio, for any closing remarks. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, operator. Thank you for joining today's call. It is our strong belief that AXIS has a very bright future ahead. We remain confident in the execution capability of our company and are committed to delivering on our promise to consistently produce profitable returns, increased shareholder value, and excellent product and services to our customers. Thank you very much. We look forward to speaking with you after the third quarter.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.