Bally's Corp DEF 14A, filed Apr 4, 2023
Bally's Corp (BALY)
DEF 14A
2023-04-04
View Original
Added on
June 12, 2026
About this DEF 14A
Bally's Corp filed this DEF 14A on April 4, 2023.
UNITED STATES | ||
| SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | ||
| Washington, D.C. 20549 | ||
| SCHEDULE 14A | ||
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of | ||
| the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | ||
| (Amendment No.) | ||
| Filed by the Registrant ☒ | Filed by a party other than the Registrant | ||||
Check the appropriate box:
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
| Preliminary Proxy Statement | |||||
| Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |||||
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | ||||
| Definitive Additional Materials | |||||
| Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 | |||||
| (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | |||||
| (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | |||||
| ☒ | No fee required. | |||||||
| Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | ||||||||
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | ||||||||
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To the Shareholders of Bally’s Corporation:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Bally’s Corporation to be held virtually on May 17, 2023 at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time. You may access the Annual Meeting via the internet through a virtual web conference at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BALY2023. Shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting are shareholders as of the close of business on March 21, 2023. You will be able to attend the meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit questions during the meeting.
The following items are to be voted on at the Annual Meeting:
| 1. | To elect the following nominees to hold office for a term of three years: | ||||
| George T. Papanier and Jeffrey W. Rollins; | |||||
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023; | ||||
| 3. | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and | ||||
| 4. | To transact other business, if any, that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements. | ||||
You may vote your shares in advance of the meeting via the internet, by telephone or by mail or by attending and voting online at the Annual Meeting via www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BALY2023. Please refer to the section “How do I vote?” in the proxy statement for detailed voting instructions. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or vote over the internet at www.proxyvote.com or by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 (toll free) as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting. To participate in the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice, proxy card or voting instruction form. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time. Online check-in will begin at 1:45 p.m., Eastern Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.
We look forward to speaking with you at the meeting.
| By Order of the Board of Directors | |||||
| Soohyung Kim | |||||
| April 4, 2023 | Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | |||||
PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS | |||||
BALLY’S CORPORATION
100 Westminster Street
Providence, Rhode Island 02903
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held virtually on May 17, 2023
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Bally’s Corporation for the Annual Meeting of shareholders to be held virtually on May 17, 2023 at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time. Shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 21, 2023 can attend the Annual Meeting online, including to vote and/or to submit questions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BALY2023. As used in this proxy statement, references to the “Company,” “Bally’s,” “we,” “our” or “us” mean Bally’s Corporation and all entities included in our consolidated financial statements.
On or about April 4, 2023, the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, including this proxy statement and our 2022 annual report to shareholders, were first sent to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 21, 2023, and are available over the internet at www.proxyvote.com.
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
You are being sent this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card because our Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote at the meeting. To vote your shares, please simply sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or vote over the internet at www.proxyvote.com or by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 (toll free) so that it is received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date.
Record Date. Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 21, 2023 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any postponement or adjournments thereof. As of March 21, 2023, 45,935,352 common shares were issued and outstanding. Each share outstanding as of the record date will be entitled to one vote, and shareholders may vote in advance of the meeting via the internet, by telephone or by mail, or by attending and voting online at the Annual Meeting.
Quorum. One-third of the common shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, represented online or by proxy, or as instructed herein virtually will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting. Common shares represented online, by proxy (including shares which abstain, broker non-votes and shares that are not voted with respect to one or more of the matters presented for shareholder approval) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting.
1
Notice and Access. In accordance with rules approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we furnish proxy materials to our shareholders over the internet. On or about April 4, 2023, we mailed to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 21, 2023, a notice containing instructions on how to access our Annual Report to Shareholders, which contains our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, our proxy statement, proxy card, and other items of interest to shareholders on the internet website indicated in our notice, at www.proxyvote.com, as well as instructions on how to vote your common shares in connection with the Annual Meeting. That notice also provided instructions on how you can request a paper copy of our proxy materials and Annual Report to Shareholders if you desire.
Required Vote. Proposal 1 is based on plurality voting, which means the director nominees who receive the most votes will be elected even if less than a majority. Only Messrs. Papanier and Rollins have been duly nominated for election. As such, a shareholder may vote to “withhold” but doing so will not affect the results of the election.
Proposals 2 and 3 require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting online or by proxy. A vote “against” or “abstain” will have the effect of a negative vote.
| Board Recommendation | Page | |||||||||||||
| PROPOSAL 1 | Election of Directors | FOR | ||||||||||||
| PROPOSAL 2 | Ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm | FOR | ||||||||||||
| PROPOSAL 3 | Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers | FOR | ||||||||||||
We know of no other matter to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter should be presented at the meeting for a vote, then the persons named as proxies would have discretion to vote on those matters according to their best judgment to the same extent as the person signing the proxy would be entitled to vote. At the date of this proxy statement, we do not anticipate that any other matters will be raised at the meeting.
Broker Non-Votes. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner and does not have discretion to direct the voting of the shares.
Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on election of directors or on matters related to executive compensation, including the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Therefore, there may be broker non-votes with respect to those votes. Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of these votes and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval of those proposals. Brokers have discretionary authority to vote on ratification of Deloitte & Touche, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and, therefore, no broker non-votes are expected in connection with that vote.
Method and Expenses of Solicitation. Proxies may also be solicited personally and by telephone or facsimile or other electronic means by our regular employees, without any additional remuneration. We will also make arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation material to beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons, and we will reimburse such persons for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in forwarding solicitation material.
Shareholders of Record. If your shares are registered in your own name, you may request paper copies of the proxy materials by following the instructions contained in the notice. Shareholders who have already made a permanent election to receive paper copies of the proxy materials will receive a full set of the proxy documents in the mail.
2
Beneficial Shareholders. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee regarding how to vote your shares. If a broker or other nominee holds your shares in “street name,” your broker has enclosed a voting instruction form, which you should use to vote those shares. The voting instruction form indicates whether you have the option to vote those shares by telephone or by using the internet.
Attendance at the Annual Meeting. To participate in the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice, proxy card or voting instruction form. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 1:45 p.m., Eastern Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.
Revocation of Proxies. Any shareholder giving a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by written notice to our Secretary at our principal executive offices at Bally’s Corporation, 100 Westminster Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, Attn: Secretary or by submission of another proxy bearing a later date. In addition, shareholders of record attending the meeting online may revoke their proxies at any time before they are exercised.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, we urge you to sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or vote over the internet at www.proxyvote.com or by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 (toll free) as soon as possible to ensure that your vote is recorded promptly. Returning the proxy card will not affect your right to attend the meeting or vote your shares online. If you complete, sign and submit your proxy card, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. If you sign and submit a proxy card but do not fill out the voting instructions on the proxy card, your shares will be voted as recommended by our Board. If any other matters are properly presented for voting at the meeting, or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting, the proxy card will confer discretionary authority on the individuals named as proxies to vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment. As of the date of this proxy statement, we have not received notice of other matters that may properly be presented for voting at the meeting.
3
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote to elect the two persons identified below to serve in the class of directors for a term of three years expiring at the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders and thereafter until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of their resignation, death or removal.
Directors will be elected by the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares represented online or by proxy at the meeting. Shareholders may not vote their shares cumulatively in the election of directors. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. Any shareholder submitting a proxy has the right to withhold authority to vote for an individual nominee by writing that nominee’s name in the space provided on the proxy. Shares represented by all proxies received by us and not marked to withhold authority to vote for any individual director or for all directors will be voted “for” the election of all of the nominees named below. If for any reason any nominee is unable to accept the nomination or to serve as a director, an event not currently anticipated, the persons named as proxies reserve the right to exercise their discretionary authority to nominate someone else or to reduce the number of management nominees to such extent as the persons named as proxies may deem advisable.
On March 31, 2023, in connection with Lee Fenton’s departure from the Board, our Board reduced the number of members of the Board to eight directors.
Nominees for Directors
George T. Papanier and Jeffrey W. Rollins have been nominated to serve as directors by our Board, based upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Governance Committee. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the nominees:
| Name and Age of Nominee | Biographical Information | |||||||
George T. Papanier Age 65 | George T. Papanier became President of Bally’s in April, 2023. From October 2021 to April 2023, Mr. Papanier was President, Casinos and Resorts of Bally’s. His association with Bally’s began in 2004 when he served as the Chief Operating Officer, an appointment he held until February 2011 when he was then appointed to the role of President and CEO of Bally’s, a position held through September, 2021. Mr. Papanier served as a director from 2011 to 2012 and from 2013 to the present. Prior to joining Bally’s, Mr. Papanier served as CEO for Peninsula Gaming, LLC, a casino operator, with properties in Iowa and Louisiana, from 2000 to 2004 and as Chief Operating Officer for Resorts Casino Hotel, a luxury ocean view hotel and casino, in Atlantic City, New Jersey from 1997 to 2000. Both positions involved strategic and tactical planning for the resorts and supervision of major renovation and construction projects. He was also active in evaluating potential acquisitions and development of projects for the two organizations. From 1995 to 1997, he served as Chief Financial Officer for both Sun International Hotels Limited, a hotel, casino and resort operator in the Bahamas, and Mohegan Sun Casino, as casino operator in Uncasville, Connecticut. Earlier in his career he served in executive operations capacities of Hemmeter Enterprises Inc., a commercial building construction company in Denver, Colorado, and in an executive financial capacity for Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino, a casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Mr. Papanier is a graduate of Rowan University where he received a B.A. in Business Administration and Accounting. He is a Certified Public Accountant and served as Treasurer of the Casino Association in New Jersey from 1999 to 2000. Mr. Papanier has been selected to serve as a director because of his extensive experience in the industry and his familiarity with the operations of the Company. | |||||||
4
| Name and Age of Nominee | Biographical Information | |||||||
Jeffrey W. Rollins Age 58 | Jeffrey W. Rollins has served as an independent director at Bally’s since May 2019. Mr. Rollins has extensive experience in gaming, having previously served as an independent director at Dover Downs, a position he held from 2002 to 2019. He joined Ashford Capital Management, an investment management services company, in August 2013 as Managing Director and is a Managing Member of Osprey Advisors. Prior to joining Ashford, Mr. Rollins founded J.W. Rollins & Associates, which focused on investing in and building established and early stage growth companies. He was also a Partner and Managing Director of a private equity fund focused on growth companies. Mr. Rollins currently serves on the Board of Directors of Dover Motorsports, Inc. (NYSE:DVD) and the Duke University Fuqua School of Business Board of Visitors. Mr. Rollins has been selected to serve as a director because of his extensive investing background and experience in the gaming industry. | |||||||
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS NAMED ABOVE.
5
Continuing Directors
The following table sets forth information relating to our directors who will continue to serve as directors until the expiration of their respective terms of office:
| Name and Age of Director | Biographical Information | |||||||
Soohyung Kim Age 48 Term expires: 2025 | Mr. Kim has served as the Chairman of the Bally's Corporation Board since December 2019 and as an independent director since 2016. Mr. Kim is the Founding Partner of Standard General L.P., an investment firm, and is the firm's Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer. He has worked in the hedge fund industry since 1997, specializing in distressed and special situations investing. Prior to founding Standard General in 2007, he was one of the Founding Partners and Director of Research of Cyrus Capital Partners, a Principal at Och-Ziff Capital Management and an analyst at the Bankers Trust Company. He currently serves as a Director of Pursuit Transformation Company, a Director and Treasurer of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, a Director of Wethersfield Foundation, and is the former President of the Stuyvesant High School Alumni Association. Mr. Kim was inducted into the GAMCO Investment Management Hall of Fame in 2016 and won American Executive of the Year at the Global Gaming Awards in 2021. He holds an A.B. from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. Mr. Kim is a former member of the board of directors of Greektown Superholdings and Media General, Inc. and the board of managers of ALST Casino Holdco, LLC. | |||||||
Terrence Downey Age 68 Term expires: 2024 | Mr. Downey has served as an independent director at Bally’s since January 2019. Mr. Downey served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of the SLS Las Vegas, a hotel and casino located in Las Vegas, Nevada, from January 2017 to July 2017. Earlier in his career, Mr. Downey served as the President and General Manager of Aliante Gaming LLC, a casino, hotel and spa operator, from November 2012 through October 2016. Prior to joining Aliante Gaming LLC, Mr. Downey worked over 15 years as Vice President and General Manager at multiple locations for Station Casinos, LLC, a hotel and casino company. Mr. Downey brings valuable experience with his demonstrated history of working in the hospitality industry and strong business development skills. | |||||||
Tracy S. Harris Age 59 Term expires: 2025 | Ms. Harris has served as an independent director of Bally’s Corporation since January, 2023. Ms. Harris has extensive financial and operational experience, having served as Chief Financial Officer for MIB Group Holdings, Inc., UMGC\Ventures, Bullis School LLC, The BondFactor Company, American Institute of Architects, Deion Hampton & Associates, and the Washington Convention Center Authority. She currently serves on the Board of 1847 Holdings LLC (NYSE:EFSH), CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield, District of Columbia Retirement Board, and the Council of Institutional Investors. Ms. Harris holds a BS in Marketing from Fontbonne University, an MBA from St. Louis University, and a Master of Public Administration from the University of Pennsylvania. | |||||||
6
| Name and Age of Director | Biographical Information | |||||||
Jaymin B. Patel Age 55 Term expires: 2024 | Mr. Patel has served as an independent director of Bally's Corporation since January 2021. He currently serves as Executive Chairman of Perennial Climate, Inc., a company involved in measuring, reporting and verifying soil-based carbon removal and climate-smart agriculture. From 2015 to 2018, Mr. Patel served as the CEO and Director of Brightstar Corporation, a $10+ billion global wireless device services company. Prior to that, Mr. Patel served as President and CEO of GTECH Corporation (now IGT) from 2008 to 2015, President and COO in 2007 and CFO of GTECH Holdings Corporation (NYSE:GTK) from 2000 to 2006, and as CFO of Lottomatica SPA (Milan:LTO.MI) from 2006 to 2007. Additionally, Mr. Patel has served on the Board of Directors of SpartanNash (NASDAQ:SPTN) since February 2022 and Brown & Brown, Inc. (NYSE:BRO) since January 2023. Mr. Patel is also a Director of Rip Van, a provider of healthy wafels and Chairman of the Foundation Board of the Community College of Rhode Island. | |||||||
Robeson M. Reeves Age 39 Term expires: 2025 | Mr. Reeves became Chief Executive Officer of Bally’s in April, 2023. From October 2021 to April 2023, Mr. Reeves was President of Bally’s Interactive Division on October 1, 2021. Formerly, he served as the Chief Operating Officer of Gamesys Group plc. (“Gamesys”), an international online gaming operator, from July 2015 to October 2021. Mr. Reeves joined Gamesys in September 2005 and held a number of positions, including Director of Gaming Operations from May 2010 to July 2015 and served as a member of the Gamesys Board of Directors from August 2010 to October 2021. Since joining Gamesys, Mr. Reeves has built a strong record in cohesively connecting player and product experiences to marketing and business key performance indicators, ensuring sustainable growth. He graduated in 2005 with a BSc in Statistics, Operations Research and Management Studies from University College, London. | |||||||
Wanda Young Wilson Age 73 Term expires: 2024 | Ms. Wilson has served as an independent director at Bally’s Corporation since May 2019. Ms. Wilson retired as the Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of the Tennessee Education Lottery Corporation (“TEL”). Ms. Wilson joined TEL in 2003 as Executive Vice President and General Counsel and was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in 2013. Prior to joining TEL, Ms. Wilson was employed at the Georgia Lottery Corporation, where she served as the Senior Vice President and General Counsel for 10 years. Earlier in her career, she was an investment banker with EF Hutton and the Northern Trust Bank. | |||||||
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board of Directors
Our Board is currently comprised of eight members and has the following five standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Compliance Committee and the ESG Committee. The membership and functions of each standing committee are described below. Each standing committee operates under a written charter which, along with our Code of Business Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines, can be found on the About—Governance Documents section of our website at www.ballys.com. The information on our website is not part of this proxy statement or any other report or registration statement that we furnish to or file with the SEC.
Board Meetings
During the year ended December 31, 2022, our Board held 13 meetings, including telephonic meetings. During this period, all of the existing directors, except for Ms. Harris who joined the Board during the first quarter of 2023, attended or participated in at least 90% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which each such director served. The independent directors met without management present at each of the regular quarterly meetings of the Board in 2022.
7
Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders
Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board at our annual meetings of shareholders, we encourage the members of our Board to attend such meetings. All of our directors attended last year’s annual meeting of shareholders, which was held on May 17, 2022, except for Ms. Harris who joined the Board during the first quarter of 2023.
Director Independence
Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), independent directors must comprise a majority of our Board. Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director based upon definitions promulgated by the SEC and the rules of the NYSE and, applying these standards, our Board has affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Downey, Kim, Patel, Rollins and Mses. Harris and Wilson qualify as an independent director under applicable rules. In making these determinations, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each director has with us and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant.
Board Leadership Structure
Since December 2019, Soohyung Kim has served as Chairman of our Board. Our Board has considered this leadership structure and believes it currently provides the most efficient and effective leadership model for Bally’s by enhancing both the Chairman’s and Chief Executive Officer’s ability to provide clear insight and direction of business strategies and plans to both our Board and management. Separating the role of Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer ensures that each individual is able to more exclusively focus on their role. Our Board has not appointed a lead independent director at this time.
Ability of Shareholders to Communicate with our Board
We have established several means for shareholders, interested parties and others to communicate with our Board. If a shareholder or interested party has a concern regarding our financial statements, accounting practices or internal controls, the concern should be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Audit Committee in care of our Secretary at our corporate office address. If the concern relates to our governance practices, business ethics or corporate conduct, the concern should be submitted in writing to a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee in care of our Secretary at our corporate office address. If a shareholder or interested party is unsure as to which category the concern relates, the shareholder may communicate it to any one or more of the independent directors in care of our Secretary at our corporate office address. All such shareholder communications will be forwarded to the applicable director(s), unless such communications are considered, in the reasonable judgment of our Secretary, to be improper for submission to the intended recipient(s). Examples of shareholder communications that would be considered improper for submission include customer complaints, solicitations, communications that do not relate directly or indirectly to Bally’s or its business or communications that relate to improper or irrelevant topics. Any such improper communication will be made available to any non-employee director upon request.
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee currently consists of Ms. Wilson (Chair) and Messrs. Patel and Rollins. Our Board has determined that each of the members is independent under the NYSE and SEC standards, and that each are financially literate within the requirements of the NYSE listing standards. Our Board has also determined that Ms. Wilson qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined by the applicable SEC and NYSE requirements.
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The primary duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are to (1) assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to (a) the Company’s financial statements, (b) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (c) the independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance, and (d) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function; (2) prepare the Committee’s report to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement; (3) advise and consult with management and the Board regarding the financial affairs of the Company; and (4) appoint, compensate, retain, terminate and oversee the work of the Company’s independent auditors. The responsibilities and activities of the Audit Committee are described in greater detail in the report included in this proxy statement under the caption “Report of the Audit Committee.”
8
The Audit Committee held 10 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022. The Audit Committee also held executive sessions on several occasions during the year with Company management not present.
Compensation Committee
Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Rollins (Chair), Ms. Wilson and Mr. Downey. Our Board has determined that each member is independent under the NYSE and SEC standards. All members of our Compensation Committee are also “non-employee directors” under SEC standards.
The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The Compensation Committee is responsible for decisions relating to all compensation plans, policies and perquisites as they affect the CEO and other executive officers and may form and delegate authority to subcommittees when it deems appropriate. Among other things, the role of the Compensation Committee is to: (1) establish and review executive compensation policies and programs; (2) review and approve executive officer compensation; (3) recommend incentive compensation plans; (4) recommend equity-based plans; (5) administer compensation plans; (6) review annually and determine the peer group(s) used for benchmarking executive compensation levels; (7) oversee regulatory compliance; (8) review employment agreements and severance agreements; (9) oversee management continuity; (10) review director compensation; (11) determine and review stock ownership guidelines; and (12) review compensation discussion and analysis.
The Compensation Committee has the authority, to the extent it deems necessary or appropriate, to retain a compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation of director or executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee also has the sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms. In addition, the Compensation Committee has the authority, to the extent it deems necessary or appropriate, to retain other advisors. Bally’s will provide appropriate funding, as determined by the Compensation Committee, for payment of compensation to any consulting firm, independent counsel or other independent advisors hired by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee or as otherwise permitted by the terms of any compensation plan, program, policy, agreement or arrangement approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board.
The Compensation Committee held six meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022. Our Chief Executive Officer (whether Mr. Fenton or Mr. Reeves) does not participate in deliberations concerning, and was not present for the vote on, his compensation arrangements. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for establishing and overseeing executive compensation is disclosed under the heading “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
Nominating and Governance Committee
Our Nominating and Governance Committee currently consists of Mr. Downey (Chair), Messrs. Patel and Rollins and Ms. Wilson. Our Board has determined that each member is independent under the NYSE and SEC standards.
The Nominating and Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The primary purpose of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to identify individuals it determines to be qualified to become members of the Board, recommend candidates to fill vacancies on the Board and newly created director positions, recommend whether incumbent directors should be nominated for re-election to the Board upon the expiration of their terms, recommend corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Board and the Company’s employee, oversees the evaluation of the Board and its committees and assess and recommend members of the Board to the Board for committee membership. The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates prospective nominees suggested by any stockholder in substantially the same manner and against substantially the same criteria as any other prospective nominee identified from any other source. No person may serve as a member of the Board or be elected or nominated for election to the Board, unless such person has been licensed to serve as a member of the Board by the applicable gaming authorities at the time of such service, election or nomination.
The Nominating and Governance Committee held five meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022.
9
Compliance Committee
Our Compliance Committee currently consists of: Ms. Wilson (Chair) and Messrs. Papanier and Patel. The Compliance Committee was formed by the Board and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The primary purpose of the Compliance Committee is to establish and administer the Company’s compliance program (the “Compliance Program”) and develop, initiate, maintain and revise compliance policies and procedures to prevent illegal, unethical, or improper conduct. Among other things, the role of the Compliance Committee is to: (1) periodically review the Code of Business Conduct to ensure continuing relevance in providing guidance to management and employees and, if applicable, recommend updates to the Code to the Board; (2) maintain reasonable current knowledge of laws and regulations; (3) respond to alleged material violations of rules, regulations, policies, procedures and the Code of Business Conduct as identified by the compliance officer by evaluating or recommending the initiation of investigative procedures; (4) act as an independent review and evaluation body with the objective of ensuring that identified compliance issues within the Company are evaluated, investigated and resolved; (5) identify potential areas of compliance vulnerability and risk, develop and implement corrective action plans determined to be appropriate for resolution of compliance issues and provide general guidance on how to avoid and address similar situations in the future; (6) monitor anti-money laundering requirements and compliance; (7) monitor the compliance communication program for the Company; (8) monitor the performance of the Compliance Program and related activities on a continuing basis, taking appropriate steps to improve its effectiveness; and (9) provide updates to the Audit Committee, as necessary, regarding the operation and progress of compliance efforts.
The Compliance Committee held seven meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022.
ESG Committee
Our ESG Committee currently consists of Mr. Reeves (Chair), Ms. Wilson and Mr. Kim. The ESG Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The purpose of the ESG Committee is to (1) review significant policies and performance on matters relating to environmental and social issues and opportunities, employee health and safety, approach to corporate social responsibility, and activities related to stakeholder engagement and philanthropy; (2) oversee and monitor the Company’s vision and values; (3) advise the Board and management on significant public issues that are pertinent to the Company and its stakeholders and; (4) assist management in setting strategy, establishing goals and integration, and sustainability into strategic and tactical business activities across the Company to create long-term shareholder value. Among other responsibilities, the ESG Committee will evaluate the Company’s policies related to responsible gaming, including the prevention of underage and problem gambling; diversity in the workforce; charitable donations and pro bono programs; the Company’s impact on the environment; and certain health and safety programs in respect of the Company’s employees, guests, and premises.
The ESG Committee held three meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Our Board has an active role, as a whole and at the committee level, in overseeing the management of our exposure to risk. The Board is regularly updated regarding risks that we face, including those that may impact our financial and operational performance, our credit and liquidity profile and other elements of our strategic plans. The Audit Committee assists our Board in this function and is charged with oversight of our policies regarding risk assessment and management, including our policies regarding management of financial risk exposure and review of related party transactions. Our other standing committees also have responsibilities with respect to risk oversight. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to executive compensation plans and arrangements. The Nominating and Governance Committee was formed to manage risks associated with the independence of the Board, including considering whether any director nominees have relationships or potential conflicts of interest that could affect their independence. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board is informed of risks we face through reports from our committees and management.
10
Corporate Social Responsibility
Bally’s is deeply committed to its people, communities and environmental footprint and incorporates environmentally sustainable and socially responsible practices into its business operations. Our approach to sustainability is overseen by the Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Committee, which is responsible for assessing ESG risks, shaping the ESG strategy and monitoring and reporting progress. A key achievement for the ESG Committee this year was oversight of the production of the Company’s first Sustainability Accounting Standard Board (SASB) disclosures.
In conjunction with the Board and executive management, the ESG Committee has established the following mission statement:
“Bally’s is committed to improving the communities in which we operate, promoting a diverse and inclusive workplace for our valued team members, and taking decisive action to minimize our environmental footprint. We strive to make a positive impact and embrace our responsibility to promote sustainable business practices and responsible gaming.”
Bally’s ESG Committee has established five specific areas of focus, each of which has its own respective mission statement. Through these missions, we contribute to the delivery of six of the seventeen UN Sustainable Development Goals, which are: Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being; Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation; Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth; Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production; Goal 13: Climate Action; and Goal 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Bally’s ESG Committee has established five specific areas of focus, each of which has their own respective mission statements. Examples of our ESG initiatives and commitment to improving are highlighted below:
Community & Philanthropy. “Improving the Communities in Which We Operate Through Corporate Social Responsibility” - Bally’s has active 501(c)(3) funds to act as a conduit for charitable donations and make a greater impact in the communities in which we operate. Among these is the Bally’s Foundation, which focuses on programs aimed at curing mental health disease, and which donated more than $2 million to such programs in 2022. In 2023 the Bally’s Foundation will focus on widening its impact in North America. In addition, each of our fifteen properties has made significant contributions within their local communities and has donated to many non-profit and charitable organizations, including various local hospitals, senior care facilities, children’s homes, schools, and community programs. In addition, in 2022, Bally’s employees donated more than 5,350 hours to various community service efforts.
As a pillar of our hiring practices, Bally’s actively considers local applicants, military personnel and first responders. The Company donates to local veteran homes and has hosted veteran career fairs to actively recruit military personnel and connect them with prospective employers. The Company also donates concert tickets to veterans and active-duty military personnel. We are also committed to providing employment opportunities to individuals with developmental disabilities. For example, we work with Access Point RI, a non-profit human services organization that provides children and adults with developmental disabilities the means to lead full and productive lives, to make available such opportunities at our Rhode Island properties.
Bally’s is committed to vendor diversity by assisting minority- and women-owned businesses in our communities through local sourcing of products and services. Bally’s Director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) engages minority and women-owned suppliers across our properties.
11
Employees. “Become the Employer of Choice by Creating a Culture of Diversity and Inclusion” – We are committed to a diverse workforce. Bally’s has a dedicated leader, the Director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, who focuses on the Company’s efforts to hire and retain a diverse and inclusive workforce and culture, as well as to seek out suppliers owned by women, minorities, veterans and persons with disabilities. Across our organization, 48% of Bally’s employees are women and 53% of its employees are members of minority groups. Bally’s leadership (management and above) is comprised of 40% women and 33% of individuals are members of groups defined as minorities. We have expanded our DEI activities across all our operations and report our progress to the Bally’s ESG Committee. Bally’s also requires anti-harassment and non-discrimination training for all employees, including how to recognize discrimination, file complaints, and the steps employees can take to support colleagues. Any allegations of discrimination are thoroughly investigated while ensuring the anonymity of aggrieved individuals and improving the awareness and sensitivity of diversity and inclusion. In addition, Bally’s engaged the entire company in education designed to enhance awareness of DEI and promote a more inclusive workplace.
Bally’s engages in a number of employee wellness initiatives, including annual blood drives, wellness fairs, flu shot clinics, weight management support programs, employee dining programs and property sanitation programs, in addition to a weekly wellness communication distribution to employees providing helpful information on health initiatives and best practices. The Company also offers a wellness fund through our medical benefits provider which provides our employees the opportunity to earn health-conscious rewards through the completion of certain wellness initiatives. We also maintain positive relationships with various unions and currently have 29 collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 2,755 employees.
In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, Bally’s adopted robust, enhanced safety measures across all properties to protect our employees and create safe environments for our valued guests. These measures all complied with local gaming and health regulators’ requirements and included screening team members and guests upon entering our properties, use of thermal imaging cameras, enforcement of social distancing guidelines, frequent cleaning and sanitizing protocols for all areas, mask protection, and public awareness signage. While most of these requirements have subsided throughout the country, Bally’s remains vigilant with its various health and safety policies.
As we move forward, Bally’s plans to implement new employee-focused programs. One such program is a formal Management Development Program across our retail properties. This two-year management training program will be rotational in nature providing exposure to both front and back-of-the-house operations, enabling management the opportunity to identify and recruit high performing talent.
Environment. “Environmental Stewardship Through Innovation and Conservation” - Respect for the environment is part of our culture and we have implemented several energy and emission efficiency initiatives at our properties. Examples from individual properties include switching lights to LEDs, switching from oil and other fuel sources to cleaner, more efficient natural gas sources, installation of electric vehicle charging points, waste segregation to maximize recycling and converting our waste vegetable oil into biofuel. Bally’s also participates in demand response and energy curtailment programs run by local utilities and regional power distribution organizations to remove part or all of the electric load from the utility grid on peak days (when requested) to save energy, reduce the need for fossil fuel power plants and help integrate renewable energy onto the electric grid by providing increased sustainability.
During the last year we have taken a number of steps to formalize and advance our approach to environmental sustainability. We now have an Environment and Climate Change Policy, have established processes to measure our direct (‘scope 1 and 2’) greenhouse gas emissions and have measured our scope 3 emissions at two properties. We will be expanding scope 3 measurement to all properties in the coming months. This will provide the foundation for a climate change risk review aligned to the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) recommendations and form the baseline against which greenhouse gas reduction targets will be set. We are committed to achieving Science-Based Target Initiative validation for these targets. As such, the reduction levels will be at least consistent with those necessary to keep global temperature increases well below 2 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial temperatures.
12
Governance. “Value Creation Through Superior Corporate Governance” - Bally’s has developed and maintained robust corporate governance documents, including our Code of Business Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and Committee Charters, which are available on our corporate website. These documents, and other ESG-related policies, are overseen by the ESG Committee. Recent additions to the suite of company ESG policies include the Environment and Climate Change Policy and the Modern Slavery Statement. In addition, Bally’s is committed to maintaining a diverse make-up of our Board, including diversity of race, gender, ethnicity, and experience.
At Bally’s, data privacy and security are essential to the trust of our guests and employees. We work hard to ensure that our team members are aware of and supported by technology to protect everyone, and we continually evaluate and update our procedures and training in this area. In this regard, Bally’s has established a Data Protection Committee, chaired by its Data Privacy Officer, to oversee all data protection and privacy matters across all its operations.
Bally’s requires all property leaders, all new hires and rehires, and all employees handling or verifying large current transactions to undertake a series of annual trainings on anti-money laundering practices to ensure proper compliance. In 2021, our Board updated its Compliance Committee, chaired by Wanda Y. Wilson, an independent director of Bally’s, and adopted a robust Gaming Compliance Review and Reporting Plan covering its retail operations. The Company’s commitment to compliance includes a separate department dedicated to the regulatory compliance of its interactive operations, which is facilitated through a detailed compliance monitoring program covering licensing, technology, and regulatory requirements.
Responsible Gaming & Guest Safety. “Ensuring Patrons Enjoy our Gaming and Non-Gaming Amenities Safely” - Responsible Gaming is a top priority for Bally’s. The Company has a corporate policy which requires all employees to be trained on responsible gaming to ensure staff members are prepared to help individuals who may be unable to keep their gambling at responsible levels. In 2022, Bally’s spent approximately 6,000 hours training staff members on responsible gaming measures.
Bally’s is an executive member of the National Council on Problem Gambling and is a member of the American Gaming Association. As a founding member of the RG Coalition, Bally’s alongside other leading operators, created a 12-principal pledge, confirming Bally’s commitment to Responsible Gaming practice. Bally’s has also signed up to and implemented the AGA’s “Have A Gameplan” campaign.
In 2022 Bally’s donated $600,000 to the International Center for Responsible Gambling for Research into safer gambling, focusing on the use and application of Responsible Gambling tools and conducting further research into younger people’s gaming and harm prevention strategies.
Our properties participate in Responsible Gaming programs provided by their respective regulators, including self-exclusion programs. In addition, in 2023, Bally’s will commence the rollout of a new RG Ambassador program in its properties.
13
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Pursuant to the Company’s non-employee director compensation policy that was in place for 2022, non-employee directors (other than Mr. Kim who declined compensation for his service as a Bally’s director in 2022) were paid an annual retainer of $200,000, consisting of $100,000 in cash paid in equal installments quarterly and $100,000 in the form of an annual grant of Bally’s restricted stock awards which vest in full in one installment on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date and the date of the Company’s annual meeting that occurs in the year immediately following the grant date year. The Chair of each of the committees of the Board receives an additional $50,000 cash retainer annually, paid in equal installments quarterly. In addition, new members of the Board receive a one-time equity grant with a grant date value of $100,000 on the grant date.
The Board designed the director compensation program to attract and retain talented directors with the relevant skills and capabilities, to fairly compensate directors for the work required, to recognize the individual roles and responsibilities of the directors and to align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of Bally’s shareholders.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Rollins (Chair), Ms. Wilson and Mr. Downey. None of these Compensation Committee members are a current or former Bally’s officer or employee. During 2022, none of Bally’s executive officers served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that had one or more of its executive officers serving on Bally’s Board or the Compensation Committee.
2022 Director Compensation Table
The following table provides compensation information for the year ended December 31, 2022. Messrs. Papanier and Reeves do not receive compensation for their service as directors because they are employees of Bally’s. Mr. Kim has declined compensation for his service as a Bally’s director. Ms. Harris is excluded from the table as she joined the Board during the first quarter of 2023. Mr. Ryan resigned as a director during the first quarter of 2023.
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) ($) | Stock Awards(2) ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Terrence Downey | 150,000 | 99,983 | — | — | — | 249,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Soohyung Kim | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jaymin B. Patel | 100,000 | 99,983 | — | — | — | 199,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey W. Rollins | 150,000 | 99,983 | — | — | — | 249,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James A. Ryan | 100,000 | 99,983 | — | — | — | 199,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wanda Y. Wilson | 200,000 | 99,983 | — | — | — | 299,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________________________
| (1) | This column shows the amount of cash compensation earned for service on the Board and its committees. | ||||
| (2) | The amounts contained in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value for the restricted stock awards, including unvested restricted stock awards, granted in 2022 calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification 718, Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). The grant date fair value for restricted stock awards is calculated using the intrinsic value method based on the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the date of grant. On May 17, 2022, Ms. Wilson and Messrs. Downey, Patel, Rollins and Ryan each received an award of restricted stock (“RSAs”) with a grant date fair value of approximately $100,000. Messrs. Downey, Patel, Rollins, Ryan and Ms. Wilson each have 3,901 unvested RSAs outstanding as of December 31, 2022. | ||||
14
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Biographical information for the executive officers of Bally’s as of the date of this proxy statement (other than our Chief Executive Officer, Robeson M. Reeves, whose biographical information is provided above under “Continuing Directors”, and our President, George T. Papanier, whose biographical information is provided under “Nominees for Directors”) is set forth below. Executive officers serve at the discretion of our Board and until their successors have been duly appointed and qualified, unless sooner removed by the Board. There are no family relationships between our directors and executive officers.
Executive Officers:
| Name | Age | Position | ||||||||||||
| Robeson M. Reeves | 39 | Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||
| Robert M. Lavan | 40 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||
| Craig L. Eaton | 58 | Senior Vice President, Head of Rhode Island Operations and Corporate Secretary | ||||||||||||
| Kim Barker Lee | 55 | Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | ||||||||||||
| George T. Papanier | 65 | President | ||||||||||||
__________________________________
Robert M. Lavan
Mr. Lavan became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2022. Prior to his appointment, he had been Senior Vice President, Finance & Investor Relations of Bally’s from May 2021 to March 2022. In this role, he led the acquisition, financing and integration of Gamesys, as well as the internal and external reporting processes. Prior to joining Bally’s, Mr. Lavan was Chief Financial Officer of NYSE-listed Turning Point Brands (NYSE:TPB) where he executed on multiple international acquisitions, complex systems integration and streamlining reporting analytics. Prior to Turning Point Brands, he was Chief Financial Officer of General Wireless Operations, an electronics retailer, and held various analyst and portfolio manager roles on Wall Street. Mr. Lavan has a B.S. in Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania.
Craig L. Eaton
Craig Eaton is the Senior Vice President, Head of Rhode Island Operations and Corporate Secretary. He has been associated with the Company since 2005 and has over 32 years of legal, regulatory and business experience. Mr. Eaton was a partner at the law firm of Adler, Pollock and Sheehan, chairing its regulatory and compliance practice group from 1998 through 2004. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Eaton was General Counsel to the Narragansett Electric Company. A 1987 cum laude graduate of Union College and 1990 graduate of Boston College Law School, he is an active participant on various charitable and civic boards, and is a volunteer coach for various youth sports organizations.
Kim Barker Lee
Kim Barker Lee is the Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer at Bally’s Corporation. Ms. Lee oversees Bally’s global legal, compliance and public affairs teams, supporting the Company's global strategic initiatives.
Ms. Lee served as General Counsel and Vice President, Legal and Regulatory Affairs for Chicago-based Northstar Lottery Group, LLC, a majority-owned IGT affiliate. Ms. Lee also served as General Counsel to the Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC), an Illinois state agency. She was also a partner in the public law practice of two prominent Chicago-based law firms. Ms. Lee also served as the Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for IGT’s Digital and Sports Betting team from 2020 to 2021. In 2018, Ms. Lee was appointed IGT’s inaugural Vice President, Diversity and Inclusion
15
Ms. Lee is a graduate of Yale College and New York University School of Law. Her board service includes Community College of Rhode Island Foundation, Family Service of Rhode Island and Providence Mutual Fire Insurance Company. She also serves on the board of American Gaming Association and the Rhode Island Foundation's Equity Leadership Initiative Steering Committee.
Ms. Lee was named one of iGB’s Most Influential Women in 2022, a Top 100 Diversity Officers by the National Diversity Council in 2020 and 2021, and one of Global Gaming Business’s 25 People to Watch for 2020.
OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table contains information about the beneficial ownership of our common shares as of March 21, 2023 for (1) each shareholder known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common shares, (2) each of our current directors, (3) each of our named executive officers, and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The percentage of ownership indicated in the following table is based on 45,935,352 common shares issued and outstanding on March 21, 2023.
Information with respect to beneficial ownership has been furnished by each director and executive officer and with respect to beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common shares, by filings made with the SEC by them. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as indicated by footnote, to our knowledge, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common shares shown as beneficially owned by them. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, common shares subject to options or warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 21, 2023 are deemed outstanding, as well as any common shares that such person has the right to acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days after March 21, 2023, while such shares are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise indicated, the mailing address of each shareholder is c/o Bally’s Corporation, 100 Westminster Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02903.
16
| Beneficial Owners | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage Ownership | |||||||||||||||
| Directors and Named Executive Officers | |||||||||||||||||
Soohyung Kim(1) | 10,589,849 | 23.1% | |||||||||||||||
| Terrence Downey | 20,505 | * | |||||||||||||||
| Tracy S. Harris | — | * | |||||||||||||||
| Jaymin B. Patel | 10,688 | * | |||||||||||||||
Jeffrey W. Rollins(2) | 79,116 | * | |||||||||||||||
| Wanda Y. Wilson | 20,253 | * | |||||||||||||||
| Lee D. Fenton | 268,824 | * | |||||||||||||||
Robert M. Lavan(3) | 24,320 | * | |||||||||||||||
Stephen Capp(4) | 254,817 | * | |||||||||||||||
| Craig L. Eaton | 138,557 | * | |||||||||||||||
George T. Papanier(5) | 407,398 | * | |||||||||||||||
Robeson M. Reeves(6) | 263,018 | * | |||||||||||||||
| All directors and executive officers, as a group (11 persons) | 12,077,345 | 26.3% | |||||||||||||||
Standard RI Ltd(1) | 10,589,849 | 23.1% | |||||||||||||||
Noel Hayden(7) | 4,953,272 | 10.8% | |||||||||||||||
HG Vora Capital Management, LLC(7) | 3,250,000 | 7.1% | |||||||||||||||
* Less than 1% | |||||||||||||||||
__________________________________ | |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Consists of 10,589,849 common shares of Bally’s held by Standard RI Ltd. Standard General L.P. serves as investment manager to Standard RI Ltd and, in that capacity, exercises voting and investment control over the shares held by Standard RI Ltd. Soohyung Kim is the managing partner and chief investment officer of Standard General L.P. Each of Mr. Kim and Standard General L.P. disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares reported except to the extent of its or his pecuniary interest in such shares. | ||||||||||||||||
| (2) | Consists of 75,707 common shares of Bally’s held by Mr. Rollins in a brokerage margin account and as such have been pledged as security for the account and 3,409 common shares of Bally’s held by a Limited Liability Corporation over which Mr. Rollins has sole voting and investment power. | ||||||||||||||||
| (3) | Consists of 24,299 common shares of Bally’s held by Mr. Lavan and 21 common shares of Bally’s held in trust. | ||||||||||||||||
| (4) | Consists of 251,817 common shares of Bally’s held by Mr. Capp and 3,000 common shares of Bally’s held by Mr. Capp’s wife. Mr. Capp disclaims beneficial ownership of these 3,000 common shares. | ||||||||||||||||
| (5) | Consists of 389,398 common shares of Bally’s held by Mr. Papanier and 18,000 common shares of Bally’s held in trust. | ||||||||||||||||
| (6) | Consists of 262,571 common shares of Bally’s held by Mr. Reeves and 447 common shares of Bally’s held by Mr. Reeves’ wife. Mr. Reeves disclaims beneficial ownership of these 447 common shares. | ||||||||||||||||
| (7) | Amounts beneficially owned by Mr. Hayden are based solely on an amended and restated Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on August 15, 2022. Mr. Hayden may be deemed the beneficial owner of all shares indicated. | ||||||||||||||||
| (8) | Amounts beneficially owned by HG Vora Capital Management, LLC are based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023. HG Vora Capital Management, LLC may be deemed the beneficial owner of all shares indicated. | ||||||||||||||||
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common shares to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. These persons are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
SEC regulations require us to identify in this proxy statement anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year. Based solely on the reports received by us and on the representations of the reporting persons, to the Company’s knowledge, these persons have complied with all applicable filing requirements during the year ended December 31, 2022.
17
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes the principles and practices underlying our named executive officer compensation program and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee of our Board related to 2022 compensation for our named executive officers.
Bally’s compensation philosophy has historically focused on the following principal objectives and has continued to use these objectives when setting executive compensation:
•pay for performance based on achievement of corporate and any applicable individual objectives;
•pay competitively to attract, retain and motivate exceptional management performance; and
•align management compensation with the achievement of business objectives and the creation of value for stakeholders.
These objectives are designed to reward results linked to both short-term and long-term performance (pay-for-performance) and to provide compensation that will attract, incentivize and retain high-caliber individuals for the most impactful management positions at Bally’s. This philosophy generally takes into account the market practices of similarly situated peer companies and reflects the Compensation Committee’s priority of attracting and retaining the highest quality talent for achievement of Bally’s strategic business plan and annual operating goals.
2022 Named Executive Officers
This CD&A focuses on the compensation of Bally’s named executive officers (the “NEOs”) for the year ended December 31, 2022:
•Lee D. Fenton, Former Chief Executive Officer
•Robert M. Lavan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
•Stephen H. Capp, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
•Craig L. Eaton, Senior Vice President, Head of Rhode Island Operations and Corporate Secretary
•George T. Papanier, President
•Robeson M. Reeves, Chief Executive Officer
Recent Executive Transitions
Effective March 14, 2022, Bally’s appointed Robert Lavan as Bally’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, replacing Stephen Capp who informed Bally’s that he would resign as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer to pursue other interests and opportunities. In February 2023, the Company announced that Lee Fenton, Chief Executive Officer, would step down from his role as Chief Executive Officer effective March 30, 2023 as a result of a mutual decision between Mr. Fenton and the Company. On February 13, 2023, the Company appointed Robeson Reeves as Chief Executive Officer, effective March 31, 2023. In connection with these leadership changes, the Company appointed George Papanier as Bally’s President, effective as of March 31, 2023. Mr. Papanier has been President, Casinos and Resorts of Bally’s land-based casino business since October 2021. Effective February 16, 2023, Craig Eaton’s title changed from Executive Vice President, General Counsel Retail and Bally’s Corporate to Senior Vice President, Head of Rhode Island Operations and Corporate Secretary due to a modification of his duties.
Development of Bally’s Executive Compensation Program
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee reviews, considers and makes determinations with respect to the compensation of Bally’s executive officers (including decisions with respect to base salary, annual bonus and long-term equity compensation). The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include development and oversight of Bally’s incentive plans, including the approval of performance criteria to be used in connection with Bally’s performance-based compensation programs.
18
Role of Bally’s Executive Officers in Determining Compensation
From time to time, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer may provide input to the Compensation Committee with respect to the performance criteria established in connection with Bally’s performance-based compensation programs, and the Chief Executive Officer may provide input and recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to any individual performance goals that may be established (for example, management objectives, etc.) in connection with those programs. However, no executive officer provides input to the Compensation Committee regarding the amount or form of compensation he receives.
Consideration of 2022 Shareholder Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation (“Say-on-Pay”)
In 2022, as a result of the Company’s status as an emerging growth company having expired in 2021, we held our first advisory Say-on-Pay vote as well as a vote on the frequency of having such Say-on-Pay votes. In 2022, approximately 90.8% of the votes cast approved the compensation for our NEOs described in our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In addition, approximately 93.3% of the votes cast at the 2022 meeting approved our holding a Say-on-Pay advisory vote on an annual basis.
In evaluating the design of our executive compensation programs and the specific compensation decisions for each of our NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers, in addition to other factors, shareholder input, including the advisory Say-on-Pay vote at our annual meeting. The Compensation Committee did not make any changes to our compensation programs or policies that were specifically driven by the results of the Say-on-Pay vote or shareholder feedback.
Establishment of Peer Group
In 2022, Bally’s management engaged a compensation consultant, Lockton Companies (“Lockton”), to provide information regarding compensation and pay practices and to prepare a peer group for the Company. Constituent companies in the peer group were selected based on an analysis of entities in the same general industry as Bally’s (or similar industries), with revenues in the range of 0.40 to 2.50 times Bally’s revenue, market capitalization in the range of 0.25 to 4.00 times Bally’s market capitalization, and similar employee populations, international footprints and non-U.S. revenue streams compared to Bally’s.
The peer group proposed by Lockton for 2022 consisted of the following companies:
•Boyd Gaming Corporation
•Churchill Downs Incorporated
•DraftKings Inc.
•Golden Entertainment, Inc.
•International Game Technology PLC
•Las Vegas Sands Corporation
•Penn National Gaming, Inc.
•Playtika Holding Corp.
•Red Rocks Resorts, Inc.
•Roblox Corporation
•Scientific Games Corporation
•Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
•Wynn Resorts, Limited
•Zynga Inc.
Although Bally’s did not engage in benchmarking for any of its fiscal year 2022 compensation decisions, comparative compensation information from Lockton was provided to the Compensation Committee to generally inform it of market practices with respect to compensation and pay practices. The Compensation Committee’s review of the peer group prepared by Lockton had no material impact on fiscal year 2022 compensation decisions for any of our NEOs.
19
Elements of Bally’s 2022 Executive Compensation Program
In 2022, compensation for the NEOs had three principal components: (1) annual base salary, (2) eligibility to receive an annual cash incentive bonus, and (3) participation in Bally’s long-term, equity-based incentive program. For purposes of this CD&A, unless otherwise noted, the amounts disclosed in U.S. dollars in this CD&A for Messrs. Fenton and Reeves are opportunities denominated in U.S. dollars in their employment agreements, but such amounts are converted from U.S. dollars into sterling pounds (GBP) when such amounts are actually paid to Messrs. Fenton and Reeves based on the applicable exchange rate.
2022 Base Salary
Bally’s provides the NEOs a base salary as a fixed component of compensation. Base salaries are intended to compensate each of the NEOs for their respective day-to-day duties and responsibilities. In determining annual base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers a number of factors, including the NEO’s skill set and individual contributions to the Company. Base salaries are generally reviewed each year by the Compensation Committee for potential adjustment (the first annual review for Messrs. Fenton and Reeves occurred in January 2023 as provided in their employment agreements), but no increase in base salary from year to year is guaranteed unless called for in the NEO’s employment agreement. None of the NEOs received a salary increase in 2022. The base salary amounts for Messrs. Fenton and Reeves are stated in U.S. dollars in their employment agreements but are converted into GBP (based on the applicable exchange rate) when paid on a monthly basis.
| Name | Base Salary for Year Ended 2022 | |||||||
| Lee D. Fenton | $ | 1,100,000 | ||||||
| Robert M. Lavan | $ | 525,000 | ||||||
| Stephen H. Capp | $ | 825,000 | ||||||
| Craig L. Eaton | $ | 400,000 | ||||||
| George T. Papanier | $ | 950,000 | ||||||
| Robeson M. Reeves | $ | 850,000 | ||||||
2022 Annual Cash Incentives
For 2022, all NEOs were eligible to earn a portion of their compensation in the form of a performance-based annual cash incentive pursuant to Bally’s annual pay-for-performance program (referred to as the “Annual PFP”). The Compensation Committee has historically paid annual incentive amounts under the Annual PFP in order to incentivize the achievement of objectives that are based on Bally’s operational, financial and strategic goals for the applicable year.
For 2022, all NEOs were eligible to earn a cash incentive payment under the Annual PFP based on the level of adjusted EBITDA achievement measured during 2022 (the “Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal”). The Compensation Committee retained the right to adjust the payout of the Annual PFP based on an individual’s performance in their role and other business factors throughout 2022. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP performance metric that the Company further adjusts in setting performance compensation. Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of the annual incentive compensation plan represents net income before interest expense, interest income, depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation and the provision for taxes, plus or minus adjustments for certain unusual and/or nonrecurring expense and income items.
2022 Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal
The Compensation Committee determined that the Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal was an appropriate performance measurement tool for the Annual PFP because it serves as a reliable indicator of Bally’s economic success. The 2022 Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal was set on January 25, 2022, at which point, the Compensation Committee approved an Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal target of $669 million for 2022. The Compensation Committee sets performance targets at levels it believes will require substantial effort by management in order to achieve payouts under the Annual PFP.
20
The following table represents the target Annual PFP cash incentive amounts for the NEOs for 2022:
| Name | 2022 Target Annual Incentive | % of Base Salary | ||||||||||||
| Lee D. Fenton | $ | 1,100,000 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
| Robert M. Lavan | $ | 525,000 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
| Stephen H. Capp | $ | 825,000 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
| Craig L. Eaton | $ | 300,000 | 75 | % | ||||||||||
| George T. Papanier | $ | 950,000 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
| Robeson M. Reeves | $ | 850,000 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
2022 Annual Cash Incentive Outcomes
Based on the continued changes the Company underwent in 2022 by integrating the multiple acquisitions it closed in 2021 (which were primarily efforts focused on the integration of Gamesys), the 2022 Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal was abandoned for purposes of determining the outcome of the Annual PFP. Instead, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to award cash incentives to the NEOs. In making such discretionary determination, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the breadth of responsibility of each NEO and the results of each business segment supported by each respective NEO. Division EBITDA, product development and delivery, leadership vision and the impact of cross divisional support were among the items considered by the Compensation Committee for purposes of determining the relevant business segment’s success for 2022. The Compensation Committee then aligned the cash incentive awards to results that reflected overall success of the following business segments proportionate to each NEO’s level of influence on such segments (reflected as percentages) as follows: Casinos and Resorts Division: 90%, Interactive Division: 80%, Corporate Support: 85%, and CEO: Enterprise 25%.
As a result, the Compensation Committee awarded a discretionary cash incentive to each of Messrs. Papanier and Eaton equal to 90% of their target Annual PFP amounts, resulting in payments equal to $855,000 and $270,000, respectively, for 2022. The Compensation Committee awarded a discretionary cash incentive to Mr. Lavan equal to 85% of his target Annual PFP amount, resulting in payment equal to $446,250, for 2022. Mr. Capp was not awarded a discretionary cash incentive by the Compensation Committee for 2022 but he ultimately received payments in lieu of such cash incentive upon his termination pursuant to the Capp Separation Agreement (as defined below).
With respect to Messrs. Fenton and Reeves, after this evaluation, the Compensation Committee awarded a discretionary cash incentive equal to 25% and 80%, respectively, of their target Annual PFP amounts, resulting in payments equal to $275,000 and $680,000, respectively, for 2022, and such payments were paid to each in GBP.
21
Long-Term Incentives - Equity-Based Compensation
In addition to short-term cash incentive award opportunities under the Annual PFP, certain NEOs have in the past received long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity-based compensation under the Company’s equity plans. The Compensation Committee has utilized equity-based incentives because equity-based incentives effectively align the executives’ interests with those of Bally’s stakeholders. Toward this end, the Compensation Committee has traditionally delivered a portion of each NEO’s long-term incentive compensation in the form of time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and a portion in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”), both granted pursuant to the Company’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) or since its adoption, the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan,” and together with the 2015 Plan, the “Plans”). Time-based RSUs function as a retention tool and we view them as inherently performance-based because the ultimate value delivered to the NEO upon settlement of the RSUs is directly tied to Bally’s share price. PSUs are designed to incentivize the NEO to achieve performance goals that are typically tied to both Bally’s annual level of Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal achievement and the achievement of other strategic initiatives. The Compensation Committee has chosen to use the Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal for both our Annual PFP and for our PSUs because the Compensation Committee believes that this approach balances short-term and long-term decision making and is consistent with the basic compensation philosophy that earnings growth will lead to long-term stakeholder value.
Time-based RSUs
On March 11, 2022, pursuant to his new employment agreement which provides for annual equity grants, Mr. Lavan was granted a time-based RSU grant of 30,313 shares under the 2021 Plan scheduled to vest over three years, with 8,072 shares that vested on December 31, 2022 and 10,297 and 11,944 shares scheduled to vest on December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024, respectively, in each case, subject generally to Mr. Lavan’s continued service with Bally’s through each such vesting date.
The other NEOs did not receive RSU awards in 2022 because none had a contractual entitlement to any equity-based awards pursuant to their respective employment agreements.
2022 PSU Awards
Mr. Lavan was granted 30,313 target PSUs on March 11, 2022 under the 2021 Plan in accordance with his new employment agreement and appointment as Bally’s Chief Financial Officer. The shares subject to Mr. Lavan’s PSU award are eligible to vest based on the achievement of certain performance goals over three separate, one-year performance periods ending December 31, 2022, December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024, subject generally to his continued service with Bally’s through the last day of the applicable performance period. The PSUs attributable to each performance period will have their own grant date (determined each year based on the date on which the Compensation Committee establishes the applicable performance goals for such period, which serves as the date on which such PSUs will be effectively granted for accounting purposes).
In reviewing Mr. Lavan’s performance throughout 2022 against certain corporate and individual objectives, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to abandon the Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal set in January 2022, as it similarly did with respect to the 2022 Annual PFP, and exercised its discretion to determine that a portion of the PSUs attributable to the 2022 performance year should vest and be paid to Mr. Lavan.
The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Lavan should earn and vest in a number of PSUs for the 2022 performance period following the completion of the Company’s 2022 financial statement audit and filing of its Form 10-K equal to 85% of the target number of PSUs that were granted under his 2022 PSU award. As a result, on March 1, 2023 Mr. Lavan received 6,861 shares of Bally’s common stock related to the 2022 performance period of his 2022 PSU award.
No other NEOs were granted PSUs in 2022 because they did not have contractual entitlement to any equity-based awards pursuant to respective employment agreements.
22
2021 PSU Awards
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Gamesys, the Compensation Committee approved, on October 1, 2021, PSU award opportunities for Messrs. Fenton and Reeves (with a target number of 70,648 PSUs and 56,518 PSUs, respectively) that are contingent on the establishment of performance goals and metrics for three separate, one-year performance periods starting January 1 and ending December 31 of 2022, 2023 and 2024. The PSUs attributable to each performance period will have their own grant date (determined each year based on the date on which the Compensation Committee establishes the applicable performance goals for such period, which serves as the date on which such PSUs will be effectively granted for accounting purposes).
Mr. Lavan was granted 8,627 target PSUs on May 1, 2021 under the 2015 Plan in connection with his original start date with the Company. The shares subject to Mr. Lavan’s PSU award are eligible to vest based on the achievement of certain performance goals over three separate, one-year performance periods ending December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023, subject generally to his continued service with Bally’s through the last day of the applicable performance period. The PSUs attributable to each performance period have (or will have) their own grant date (determined each year based on the date on which the Compensation Committee establishes the applicable performance goals for such period, which serves as the date on which such PSUs will be effectively granted for accounting purposes).
Messrs. Papanier and Capp were granted 57,241 and 19,011 target PSUs on January 19, 2021 and February 23, 2021, respectively, under the 2015 Plan in connection with the amendment of their employment agreements, which provided for such grant. The shares subject to Mr. Papanier’s PSU award are eligible to vest based on the achievement of certain performance goals over three separate, one-year performance periods ending December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023, and the shares subject to Mr. Capp’s PSU award were eligible to vest based on the achievement of certain performance goals over two separate, one-year performance periods ending December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, in each case, subject generally to his continued service with Bally’s through the last day of the applicable performance period.
Mr. Eaton was not granted PSUs in 2021 because he did not have contractual entitlement to any equity-based awards pursuant to his employment agreement.
In reviewing the performance of Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, Papanier and Reeves throughout 2022 against certain corporate and individual objectives, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to abandon the Adjusted EBITDA Performance Goal set in January 2022, as it similarly did with respect to the 2022 Annual PFP, and exercised its discretion to determine a payout of the portion of the PSUs attributable to the 2022 performance year.
The Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, Papanier and Reeves should earn and vest in a number of PSUs for the 2022 performance period following the completion of the Company’s 2022 financial statement audit and filing of its Form 10-K equal to 25%, 85%, 90% and 80% of the target number of PSUs attributable to the 2022 performance period, respectively, that were granted under their 2021 PSU awards. As a result, on March 1, 2023 Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, Papanier and Reeves received 5,887, 2,933, 17,172 and 15,071 of Bally’s common shares, respectively, related to the 2022 performance period of their 2021 PSU awards.
For the 2022 performance period of the 2021 PSU Award, Mr. Capp, per his separation agreement, vested in 4,270 shares. For a detailed description of the separation agreement with Mr. Capp, see “Agreements with NEOs” of this proxy statement.
Employment, Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Arrangements
Bally’s does not maintain stand-alone change-in-control agreements with any of its NEOs or with any of its other officers. However, certain employment agreements with the NEOs, as described below, provide for severance benefits in connection with certain terminations following a change-in-control and certain equity award agreements with the NEOs, as described below, provide for equity vesting or payment in connection with either the occurrence of a change-in-control or certain terminations following a change-in-control. Bally’s does not provide any of the NEOs or any of its other officers with a “gross up” for so-called “golden parachute” excise tax obligations payable by the executive in connection with a change in control or a subsequent termination of the executive’s employment.
23
During 2022, the NEOs were each party to an employment agreement with Bally’s or a subsidiary of Bally’s.
Bally’s maintains employment agreements with each of the NEOs because employment agreements can help set the expectations of the parties and may also provide comfort to executives during periods of transition. The employment agreements with Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier (and, prior to his termination of employment in April 2022, Mr. Capp) provide for severance payments and benefits in the event of certain involuntary termination events (including following a change in control). In addition, the award agreements pursuant to which RSUs and PSUs have been granted to each of the NEOs provide for vesting upon certain termination events and, with respect to the RSUs, for double-trigger vesting in the event of a change in control. This generally means that the RSUs will only automatically vest in full upon a change in control if the acquiring or surviving entity does not provide a replacement award (as described in the 2015 Plan or 2021 Plan, as applicable) to the holder.
If the acquiring or surviving entity provides a replacement award in connection with a change in control, the vesting of the NEO’s RSUs will only accelerate upon the “involuntary termination” of employment (as defined in the applicable Plan or award agreement) within two years following the change in control. An “involuntary termination” for awards granted under the 2015 Plan generally includes a termination due to death, disability or retirement but excludes a termination by the Company for “cause” or by the NEO without “good reason.” For awards granted under the 2021 Plan, an “involuntary termination” is generally limited to a termination by the Company without “cause” or by the NEO for “good reason” (as defined in the applicable award agreement).
The RSU award agreements also provide that, upon a termination of employment due to the NEO’s death or disability, the number of RSUs scheduled to vest on the next applicable vesting date will vest. The 2020 RSU award agreements for Messrs. Papanier and Capp do not provide for any accelerated vesting upon a termination without “cause” or a termination by the NEO for “good reason.” However, the 2021 RSU award agreements for Messrs. Papanier and Capp and the 2022 RSU award agreement for Mr. Lavan do provide for accelerated vesting of the RSUs upon a termination without “cause” (and for Messrs. Fenton and Reeves, also upon a termination by them for “good reason”).
The PSUs will fully vest at the “target” performance level upon the change in control. In the event of termination of employment due to the individual’s death, (1) any PSUs earned in respect of any previously completed performance periods will vest at the “target” performance levels, (2) the unvested PSUs attributable to the performance period during which the termination occurs will vest at the “target” level on a pro-rata based (based upon the number of days of the NEO’s service during the applicable performance period), and (3) any unvested PSUs attributable to any subsequent performance periods will be forfeited. In the event of a termination of employment by the Company without “cause” or due to the NEO’s disability, or a termination by the NEO for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the 2015 Plan, or, if granted under the 2021 Plan, the award agreement), all PSUs (including for prior, current and future performance periods) will vest based on actual performance.
For a detailed description of the employment agreements with Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, Eaton, Papanier and Reeves and the separation agreement with each of Messrs. Capp and Fenton, see “Agreements with NEOs” of this proxy statement.
Other Benefits and Limited Perquisites
During 2022, for the months of February and March, Mr. Fenton received health insurance through the Company-sponsored medical plan. For the remaining calendar months of 2022, Mr. Fenton opted to receive health insurance outside of the Company-sponsored medical plan. Mr. Fenton was also eligible for group life insurance covering at least four times his annual base salary and permanent health insurance covering at least 75% of his annual base salary from the Company-sponsored income protection plan. For the month of January, Mr. Fenton participated in the Company-sponsored pension plan, to which Gamesys contributed GBP 3,309 ($4,080) for 2022 (using an average foreign exchange rate of 1.233 for the year ended December 31, 2022). For the rest of the calendar months in 2022, Mr. Fenton opted out of the Company-sponsored pension plan and received a cash allowance in lieu thereof equal to GBP 31,986 ($39,435) for 2022 (using an average foreign exchange rate of 1.233 for the year ended December 31, 2022). In addition, Mr. Fenton is eligible to receive tax protection such that he may receive a tax reimbursement and/or tax gross-up to reimburse him for any increase in income or social security taxes under U.S. tax law that are in excess of the taxes that would have been applicable to his compensation had he performed all activities in the United Kingdom.
24
During 2022, for the months of January, February and March, Mr. Reeves received health insurance through the Company-sponsored medical plan. For the remaining calendar months in 2022, Mr. Reeves opted to receive health insurance outside of the Company-sponsored medical plan. Mr. Reeves was also eligible for group life insurance covering at least four times his annual base salary and permanent health insurance covering at least 75% of annual base salary from the Company-sponsored income protection plan. For the month of January, Mr. Reeves participated in the Company-sponsored pension plan, to which Gamesys contributed GBP 2,557 ($3,153) for 2022 (using an average foreign exchange rate of 1.233 for the year ended December 31, 2022). For the rest of the calendar months, Mr. Reeves opted out of the Company-sponsored pension plan and received a cash allowance in lieu thereof equal to GBP 24,717 ($30,473) for 2022 (using an average foreign exchange rate of 1.233 for the year ended December 31, 2022). In addition, Mr. Reeves is eligible to receive tax protection such that he may receive a tax reimbursement and/or tax gross-up to reimburse him for any increase in income or social security taxes under U.S. tax law that are in excess of the taxes that would have been applicable to his compensation had he performed all activities in the United Kingdom.
During 2022, Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier received health and welfare benefits under the same programs, and were subject to the same eligibility requirements, that applied to employees of Bally’s generally. Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier were also eligible to participate in Bally’s 401(k) plan. In connection with such participation, in 2022, Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier received a matching contribution from Bally’s in the amount of $2,815, $3,046, $3,692, and $4,346, respectively. Bally’s does not sponsor or maintain any deferred compensation programs. In addition, Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier received the following additional benefits in 2022: Company-paid group term life insurance premiums in the amount of $945 for Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier and $315 for Mr. Capp; Company contributions for the executive long-term disability policy in the amount of $1,100 for Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier and $370 for Mr. Capp; and Company contributions for the executive accidental death and dismemberment policy in the amount of $135 for Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier and $45 for Mr. Capp.
Bally’s Share Ownership Guidelines and Policies for Directors and Officers
In 2019, Bally’s adopted share ownership guidelines applicable to its directors and officers. The guidelines require that non-employee directors beneficially own, during their service on the Bally’s Board, common shares of Bally’s equal in value to at least five times their annual cash retainer. Bally’s officers are required to meet the following share ownership guidelines:
| Officer Position | Value of Shares Owned | |||||||
| Chief Executive Officer | 5 times base salary | |||||||
| Executive Vice Presidents | 3 times base salary | |||||||
| Other officers | 2 times base salary | |||||||
Non-employee directors and officers have five years from their initial election to the Board or beginning of their employment, as applicable, to meet the target stock ownership guidelines, and they are expected to continuously own sufficient shares to meet the guidelines once attained. When calculating whether a director or officer owns a sufficient number of shares under these guidelines, the following are included: (1) shares owned (including restricted shares, shares obtained upon option exercise, shares purchased in the open market, shares in a savings or interest plan, etc.), (2) shared ownership (for example, shares owned or held in trust by immediate family), (3) shares the receipt of which have been deferred, (4) restricted stock units, (5) shares owned by a trust or other entity as to which the director or officer has voting or investment authority, and (6) unexercised stock options and performance stock units.
25
As of March 21, 2023, the following Bally’s executive officers were not yet within the applicable guidelines due to the date on which their employment commenced: Mr. Lavan, who joined the Company in May 2021, and Ms. Barker Lee, who joined the Company in December 2022. As of March 21, 2023, the following non-directors were not within the applicable guidelines due to the date of their election to the board: Ms. Wilson and Mr. Downey, who were appointed as non-employee directors in 2019, Mr. Patel, who was appointed in 2021, and Ms. Harris, who was appointed in 2023. Directors and NEOs of Bally’s beneficially own 26.3% of the outstanding common shares of Bally’s as of March 21, 2023. An affiliate of Bally’s director Soohyung Kim beneficially owns 23.1%. See the section titled “Ownership of Securities and Related Shareholder Matters” of this proxy statement.
Prohibition on Insider Trading and Hedging of Company Stock
Bally’s has adopted an insider trading policy, effective March 28, 2019, prohibiting trading in designated blackout periods by directors, officers and certain key employees or members of their immediate families, other than in a fiduciary capacity. In addition, these persons are prohibited from purchasing, selling or writing calls, puts or other options or derivative instruments on common shares of Bally’s, or otherwise hedging or pledging shares of Bally’s securities they own as collateral or security for indebtedness. This policy is intended to apply to transactions that could be deemed to be speculative, such as short sales, options trading or other similar derivative transactions in Bally’s securities, and hedging transactions, including zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts in which the individual continues to own the underlying security without the full risks and rewards of ownership. The pledging restriction is intended to apply to shares owned by the individual officer or director, and not shares owned for the benefit of others. In 2020, a waiver was granted by the Company to Mr. Rollins in regard to the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Insider Trading Policy prohibiting the pledge of shares. Mr. Rollins owned shares of Dover Downs in a brokerage margin account and as such were pledged as security for the account. Those shares were exchanged for shares of the Company in the acquisition of Dover Downs. After examining the facts and circumstances pertaining to the pledge, the Company waived the provisions of the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Insider Trading Policy in respect of those shares.
Clawback Recoupment
On January 18, 2019, Bally’s adopted a compensation recovery policy applicable to executive officers effective as of March 28, 2019 that allows Bally’s to clawback previously earned performance-based incentive compensation, including equity compensation, for conduct constituting fraud, or other intentional misconduct, that results in material or financial or reputational harm to the Company, including such conduct that requires Bally’s to restate its previously published financial results. In the event of a restatement, the result of which is that any performance-based compensation paid would have been a lower amount had it been calculated based on such restated results, an independent director committee may recover the after-tax portion of the difference between the awarded compensation and the amount of the compensation had it been calculated based on the restated financial statements. In the event an executive officer engages in detrimental activity more generally, the committee may seek to recover any performance-based compensation previously paid to such officer. We intend to review and, if necessary, revise our current compensation recovery policy to reflect the final SEC rules implementing the incentive-based compensation recovery provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the listing standards to be adopted by the NYSE during the required timeframe in compliance with those standards.
Other Compensation-Related Matters
As a general matter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and considering the various tax and accounting implications of the compensation and benefits programs it implements. Share-based compensation is expensed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. In general, Bally’s recognizes share-based compensation expenses in the period in which the employee or director is required to provide service, which is generally over the vesting period of the individual share-based award. The Compensation Committee and Bally’s management also review existing compensation arrangements for tax efficiency and compliance.
26
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee has a process in place for reviewing its compensation programs for risk. When designing its compensation programs, the Compensation Committee strives to mitigate risks while retaining the design features that it believes work best to incentivize and motivate employees. The Compensation Committee reviews its compensation programs annually to help ensure that its compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk-taking behavior. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee does not believe that its compensation programs and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Bally’s.
Compensation Committee Report *
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement with management. Based on such review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Bally’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and in this proxy statement.
The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who constitute the Compensation Committee.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Jeffrey W. Rollins (Chair)
Terrence Downey
Wanda Y. Wilson
| * | The material in this report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC, and is not incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made on, before, or after the date of this proxy statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing. | ||||
27
2022 Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides information concerning the compensation of the 2022 NEOs for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, as applicable.
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary(1) | Bonus(2) | Stock Awards(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | All Other Compensation(4) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee D. Fenton(5)(6)(7) | 2022 | 1,100,000 | 275,000 | 844,232 | — | 44,156 | 2,263,388 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Former Chief Executive Officer | 2021 | 275,000 | 939,817 | 4,338,145 | — | 18,267 | 5,571,229 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert M. Lavan(6) | 2022 | 470,992 | 446,250 | 1,333,099 | — | 8,102 | 2,258,443 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| EVP & Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen H. Capp | 2022 | 275,676 | — | 459,310 | — | 600,511 | 1,335,497 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Former EVP & Chief Financial Officer | 2021 | 787,500 | 206,250 | 2,185,564 | — | 19,601 | 3,198,915 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 600,000 | — | 2,147,690 | 632,967 | 20,604 | 3,401,261 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Craig L. Eaton(5) | 2022 | 392,123 | 270,000 | — | — | 15,166 | 677,289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SVP, Rhode Island Operations and Corporate Secretary | 2021 | 378,604 | 270,375 | — | — | 18,068 | 667,047 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 360,500 | — | 811,134 | 142,409 | 13,711 | 1,327,754 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
George T. Papanier(5) | 2022 | 931,291 | 855,000 | 684,018 | — | 15,820 | 2,486,129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| President | 2021 | 940,458 | 950,000 | 3,768,400 | — | 19,601 | 5,678,459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 721,000 | — | 2,088,281 | 760,639 | 31,508 | 3,601,428 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robeson M. Reeves(5)(6)(7) | 2022 | 850,000 | 680,000 | 675,378 | — | 34,205 | 2,239,583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer | 2021 | 212,500 | 775,413 | 3,500,656 | — | 15,861 | 4,504,430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | For Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, Capp, Eaton, Papanier and Reeves, the amount represents the base salary paid to each of them during the relevant year and reflects any increase in base salary that became effective during the applicable year. | ||||
| (2) | The amounts in this column reflect amounts paid to each NEO as a discretionary annual incentive awarded by the Compensation Committee for the 2022 performance year. Refer to the “2022 Annual Cash Incentives” section of the CD&A for further explanation. | ||||
| (3) | Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of awards of time-based vesting RSUs and PSUs at the target level as computed under ASC 718, granted during the fiscal year indicated. For additional information, please refer to Note 16 “Equity Plans” in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 included in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For PSUs, grant date fair value is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance result (i.e., target level of performance) for each of the performance periods. These amounts do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that were paid to, or may be realized by, the NEO for any of the fiscal years reflected. | ||||
| (4) | Amounts shown for 2022 consist of (1) a gross-up for Company-paid health insurance premiums paid for Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier, (2) pay received in lieu of benefits for Messrs. Fenton and Reeves, (3) Bally’s contributions under a Company-sponsored defined contribution plan for Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, Capp, Eaton, Papanier and Reeves in the amount of $4,080, $2,815, $3,046, $3,692, $4,346, and $3,153, respectively, (4) Bally’s payment of group term life insurance premiums for each of Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier in the amount of $945 and Mr. Capp in the amount of $315, (5) contributions for the executive long-term disability policy for each of Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier in the amount of $1,100 and Mr. Capp in the amount of $370, (6) contributions for the executive AD&D policy for each of Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier in the amount of $135 and Mr. Capp in the amount of $45, (7) cash payments of $275,000 paid to Mr. Capp in two installments in 2022 pursuant to the Capp Separation Agreement (as defined below), and (8) for Mr. Capp, vesting of 4,270 of his unvested RSUs and 4,270 of his unvested PSUs, in each case, on April 30, 2022 pursuant to the terms of the Capp Separation Agreement, with values of $127,417 and $127,417, respectively. | ||||
| (5) | Mr. Fenton’s service as Bally’s Chief Executive Officer ended on March 30, 2023, Mr. Reeves assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer of Bally’s on March 31, 2023, Mr. Papanier was appointed Bally’s President as of March 31, 2023, and Mr. Eaton’s title became Senior Vice President, Head of Rhode Island Operations and Corporate Security effective February 16, 2023. | ||||
| (6) | Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, and Reeves were not NEOs for all three years listed in this table, and accordingly, compensation information for 2020, and additionally 2021 in the case of Mr. Lavan, is not provided. | ||||
| (7) | All amounts under “All Other Compensation” were converted to USD from GBP using an average foreign exchange rate of 1.233 for 2022. | ||||
28
2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The table below provides information regarding awards granted during 2022 to our NEOs.
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(3) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grant Date | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | ($) | ($) | ($) | (#) | (#) | (#) | (#) | ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lee D. Fenton | January 25, 2022 | — | — | — | — | 23,549 | — | — | 844,232 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N/A | 550,000 | 1,100,000 | 1,100,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robert M. Lavan | January 25, 2022 | — | — | — | — | 3,451 | — | — | 123,718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 11, 2022 | 8,072 | 289,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 11, 2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30,313 | 920,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N/A | 262,500 | 525,000 | 1,050,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen H. Capp | January 25, 2022 | — | — | — | — | 12,812 | — | — | 459,310 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N/A | 412,500 | 825,000 | 1,650,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Craig L. Eaton | N/A | 150,000 | 300,000 | 600,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| George T. Papanier | January 25, 2022 | — | — | — | — | 19,080 | — | — | 684,018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N/A | 475,000 | 950,000 | 1,900,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robeson M. Reeves | January 25, 2022 | — | — | — | — | 18,839 | — | — | 675,378 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N/A | 425,000 | 850,000 | 850,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | This column shows the possible payouts to the NEOs under our Annual PFP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 for each of “threshold”, “target” and “maximum” performance. | ||||
| (2) | The awards in this column represent the number of PSUs that may be earned with respect to the 2022 performance period at “target” level of performance. The PSUs granted to Mr. Fenton were originally awarded on October 1, 2021, to Mr. Lavan on May 1, 2021 and March 11, 2022 (3,451 PSUs and 8,072 PSUs, respectively), to Mr. Capp on February 23, 2021, to Mr. Papanier on January 19, 2021, and to Mr. Reeves on October 1, 2021. However, because the performance criteria and the target levels applicable to each performance year comprising the awards are established in connection with each one-year performance period, the amounts shown above and referenced in the immediately preceding sentence only reflect the portion of the respective award that is attributable to the 2022 performance period and effectively granted during 2022. Vesting of these PSUs for the year ended December 31, 2022 was determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. The PSUs earned by the NEO will be settled in the same number of common shares of Bally’s. For a detailed discussion of Bally’s long-term equity compensation program for 2022 (including the applicable performance factors and achievement levels), see the “Long-Term Incentives” section of the CD&A. | ||||
| (3) | The awards represent time-based vesting RSUs granted in 2022 to the NEOs. The RSU award granted to Mr. Lavan on March 11, 2022 will vest in three installments: 8,072 RSUs on December 31, 2022, 10,297 RSUs on December 31, 2023 and 11,944 RSUs on December 31, 2024. Messrs. Fenton, Capp, Eaton, Papanier and Reeves did not receive RSU awards in 2022. | ||||
| (4) | Amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU and PSU awards determined in accordance with ASC 718. | ||||
29
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End Table
The following table sets forth certain information concerning common shares of Bally’s subject to unvested equity incentive plan awards held as of December 31, 2022 by the NEOs. There were no unexercised stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2022. Mr. Eaton did not have any unvested equity incentive awards outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
| Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grant Date | (#) | ($) | (#) | ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lee D. Fenton | October 1, 2021 | 47,099 | (4) | 912,779 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| November 4, 2021 | 13,697 | (5) | 265,448 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70,648 | (9) | 1,369,158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robert M. Lavan | May 1, 2021 | 3,451 | (6) | 66,880 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 11, 2022 | 22,241 | (7) | 431,031 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37,215 | (9) | 721,227 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| George T. Papanier | January 19, 2021 | 19,080 | (8) | 369,770 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | — | 38,160 | (9) | 739,541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robeson M. Reeves | October 1, 2021 | 37,679 | (4) | 730,219 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| November 4, 2021 | 11,660 | (5) | 225,971 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56,518 | (9) | 1,095,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents unvested time-based restricted stock units. | ||||
| (2) | Amounts shown in this column represent the number of outstanding RSUs and PSUs multiplied by $19.38 per share, the closing price of Bally’s common shares on the NYSE on December 30, 2022 (December 31, 2022 was not a trading day). | ||||
| (3) | Represents the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to PSUs based on achievement at “target” level. The actual number of shares to be issued for each of these grants, if any, has not been determined and will be determined based on the relevant performance criteria over the applicable performance periods. | ||||
| (4) | RSUs awarded to Messrs. Fenton and Reeves on October 1, 2021 vest in equal installments on December 31 of each of 2022, 2023 and 2024. | ||||
| (5) | RSUs awarded to Messrs. Fenton and Reeves on November 4, 2021 vest in equal installments on January 1 of each of 2023 and 2024. | ||||
| (6) | RSUs awarded to Mr. Lavan on May 1, 2021 vest as follows: 1,725 shares on December 31, 2021, 3,451 shares on December 31, 2022 and 3,451 shares on December 31, 2023. | ||||
| (7) | RSUs awarded to Mr. Lavan on March 11, 2022 vest as follows: 8,072 shares on December 31, 2022, 10,297 shares on December 31, 2023 and 11,944 shares on December 31, 2024. | ||||
| (8) | RSUs awarded to Mr. Papanier on January 19, 2021 vest in equal installments on December 31 of each of 2021, 2022 and 2023. | ||||
| (9) | Represents (1) the PSUs granted to Messrs. Fenton and Reeves on October 1, 2021, one-third of which is attributable to the 2022 performance period; (2) the PSUs granted to Mr. Lavan on May 1, 2021 and March 11, 2022, 11,523 of which is attributable to the 2022 performance period; and (3) the PSUs granted to Mr. Papanier on January 19, 2021, one-third of which were attributable to the 2022 performance period. For Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, Papanier and Reeves 5,887, 9,797, 17,172 and 15,071 PSUs vested on March 1, 2023, respectively, reflecting 25%, 85%, 90% and 80%, respectively, of the target number of PSUs attributable to the 2022 performance period. | ||||
30
2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table contains information about restricted stock units held by the applicable NEO that vested during 2022. No options were exercised by the NEOs during 2022.
| Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(1) | Value Realized on Vesting(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (#) | ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lee D. Fenton | 23,549 | 456,380 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robert M. Lavan | 13,248 | 284,139 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen H. Capp | 37,088 | 1,327,894 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Craig L. Eaton | 10,696 | 407,090 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| George T. Papanier | 58,534 | 1,817,963 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robeson M. Reeves | 18,839 | 365,100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________________________
| (1) | In connection with the vesting of RSUs and PSUs, our NEOs surrendered shares of stock to cover withholding taxes, thereby reducing the actual value received upon vesting and settlement. The number of shares surrendered but included in this table was: Mr. Fenton—11,069; Mr. Lavan—3,319; Mr. Capp—13,126; Mr. Eaton—3,438; Mr. Papanier—23,226; Mr. Reeves—8,855. | ||||
| (2) | Represents the product of the number of shares or shares underlying units vested and the closing price of Bally’s common shares on the NYSE on the vesting date. | ||||
2022 Pension Plan Benefits
None of the NEOs participate in any pension plans providing for payment or other benefits at, following or in connection with retirement.
2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
None of the NEOs participate in any deferred compensation plans or programs.
Agreements with NEOs
Employment Agreements
Certain elements of compensation set forth in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table and 2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table reflect the terms of our employment agreements with our NEOs as described below. Bally’s or a subsidiary of Bally’s is a party to an employment agreement with each of Messrs. Fenton, Lavan, Eaton, Papanier and Reeves (and, prior to his termination of employment in April 2022, Mr. Capp). For the sake of clarity, any reference to Mr. Capp’s employment agreement in this section describes the terms of such agreement as in effect prior to his termination of employment in April 2022.
31
Lee D. Fenton - The service agreement with Mr. Fenton which sets forth the terms and conditions relating to his appointment as Bally’s CEO was originally entered into effective as of October 1, 2021 and subsequently amended effective June 1, 2022 (the “Fenton Service Agreement”). The Fenton Service Agreement provides for the following: Mr. Fenton’s annual compensation which consists of an annual base salary equal to $1,100,000 (which is converted monthly from U.S. dollars into GBP based on the average exchange rate in respect of the applicable calendar month in which it is paid unless Gamesys elects to use a rate as of a different date or dates) and a potential target bonus of 100% of base salary (which, if earned, is also payable in GBP); eligibility to participate in the Gamesys benefit programs (which include, but are not limited to, private medical insurance, life assurance, permanent health insurance, and a personal pension scheme (which is similar to a U.S.-style defined contribution plan) to which Gamesys will make contributions equal to 10% of Mr. Fenton’s annual base salary); 30 days of paid time off each year (in addition to paid time off during public holidays observed in the United Kingdom); and customary restrictive covenants and confidentiality provisions that include non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions during Mr. Fenton’s employment with the Company and for 12 months thereafter. The Fenton Service Agreement also provides that, although Mr. Fenton will be liable for any applicable U.S. taxes paid on his compensation, Gamesys will implement a “tax protection policy” such that Mr. Fenton will be entitled to a tax reimbursement and/or tax gross-up to reimburse him for any increase in income or social security taxes under U.S. tax law that are in excess of the taxes that would have been applicable to his compensation had he performed all activities in the United Kingdom (the “Tax Protection Benefits”). The amendment to the Fenton Service Agreement permits Gamesys to use a different exchange rate other than the rate on the date of payment for converting Mr. Fenton’s base salary payments from U.S. dollars into GBP.
Robert M. Lavan - The employment agreement entered into with Mr. Lavan was effective as of March 14, 2022 and provides for a term that runs until December 31, 2024, with automatic one-year extensions for each year thereafter, an annual base salary equal to $525,000, which will be adjusted annually, and eligibility to receive a target annual cash bonus equal to his base salary and annual equity grants.
Steven H. Capp - The employment agreement entered into with Mr. Capp was originally effective as of January 1, 2019 (the “Capp Employment Agreement”). On February 23, 2021, Bally’s amended the Capp Employment Agreement effective as of February 23, 2021. The amendment extended the term of Mr. Capp’s employment agreement through December 31, 2022 (the “Capp Initial Period”) (with automatic one-year extensions following the Capp Initial Period), increased Mr. Capp’s annual base salary to $825,000 for the remainder of the Capp Initial Period and entitled Mr. Capp to receive two one-time equity awards. The first is an equity award of 12,398 shares, of which 50% was to be granted in the form of time-based equity awards and 50% was to be granted in the form of PSUs, with both portions of the award vesting on December 31, 2021. The second is an equity award of 25,624 shares, of which 50% was to be granted in the form of time-based equity awards and 50% was to be granted in the form of PSUs, with both portions of the award vesting on December 31, 2022. The Capp Employment Agreement also provided Mr. Capp with eligibility to receive a target annual cash bonus equal to his base salary.
Craig L. Eaton - The employment agreement entered into with Mr. Eaton was effective as of July 10, 2013 and provides for an initial term that ended on July 10, 2015 with automatic one-year extensions for each year thereafter, annual base salary equal to $350,000, and eligibility to receive a target annual cash bonus equal to 50% of Mr. Eaton’s base salary.
George T. Papanier - The employment agreement entered into with Mr. Papanier was originally effective as of March 29, 2016 and subsequently amended on January 13, 2020 (the “Papanier Employment Agreement”). On January 20, 2021, the Papanier Employment Agreement was amended again, effective as of January 16, 2021. The latest amendment remained in effect during 2022 and extended the term of Mr. Papanier’s employment agreement through December 31, 2023 (the “Papanier Initial Period”) (with automatic one-year extensions following the Papanier Initial Period), increased Mr. Papanier’s annual base salary to $950,000 for the remainder of the Papanier Initial Period and entitled Mr. Papanier to receive a one-time equity award of 114,482 shares, of which 50% was to be granted in the form of time-based equity awards and 50% was to be granted in the form of PSUs, with both portions of the award vesting ratably on December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023. The Papanier Employment Agreement also provides that Mr. Papanier is eligible to receive a target annual cash bonus equal to his base salary.
32
Robeson M. Reeves - The service agreement with Mr. Reeves which sets forth the terms and conditions relating to his employment with Bally’s was originally entered into effective as of October 1, 2021 and subsequently amended effective June 1, 2022 (the “Reeves Service Agreement”). The Reeves Service Agreement provides for the following: annual compensation which consists of an annual base salary equal to $850,000 (which is converted monthly from U.S. dollars into GBP based on the average exchange rate in respect of the applicable calendar month in which it is paid unless Gamesys elects to use a rate as of a different date or dates) and a potential target bonus of 100% of base salary (which, if earned, is also payable in GBP); eligibility to participate in the Gamesys benefit programs (which include, but are not limited to, private medical insurance, life assurance, permanent health insurance, and a personal pension scheme to which Gamesys will make contributions equal to 10% of Mr. Reeves’ annual base salary); 30 days of paid time off each year (in addition to paid time off during public holidays observed in the United Kingdom); and customary restrictive covenants and confidentiality provisions that include non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions during Mr. Reeve’s employment with the Company and for 12 months thereafter. Mr. Reeves is also entitled to the Tax Protection Benefits as described above for Mr. Fenton. Pursuant to the Reeves Service Agreement, Mr. Reeves’ employment will continue until terminated by either party in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The amendment to the Reeves Service Agreement permits Gamesys to use a different exchange rate other than the rate on the date of payment for converting Mr. Reeve’s base salary payments from U.S. dollars into GBP.
Upon a termination of employment by Bally’s or a subsidiary, as applicable, without “justifiable cause” with respect to Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier or by Messrs. Capp and Papanier for “good reason,” Bally’s will pay, as applicable, (or would have paid in the case of Mr. Capp), the following separation payments and benefits: (1) any earned but unpaid annual bonus for the year prior to the year of termination, (2) a pro-rated annual bonus for the year in which the termination of employment occurs, and (3) continued payment of annual base salary for the longer of (a) the amount of time remaining until the end of the term of the employment agreement and (b) a period of 12 months following the termination date other than with respect to Mr. Lavan, who will receive continued payment of annual base salary for 12 months following the termination date) (the “Base Salary Continuation”). The agreement with Mr. Capp would have provided for continued payment of his annual bonus for the same period of time during which the Base Salary Continuation is paid. In addition, during the applicable severance period, Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier (and, prior to his termination of employment in April 2022, Mr. Capp), as applicable, will continue (or would have continued, in the case of Mr. Capp) to be eligible to participate in Bally’s group health and dental plans or, if the executive is ineligible to continue to participate in such plans, Bally’s will pay the executive’s COBRA premiums during the applicable period and, during the applicable severance period, Bally’s will pay Mr. Lavan monthly payments equal to his COBRA premiums on the termination date.
If Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier’s employment is terminated by Bally’s or a subsidiary, as applicable, without “justifiable cause” or by Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier for “good reason” within 12 months following a “change in control,” Bally’s will pay (or would have paid, in the case of Mr. Capp prior to his termination of employment), to the applicable individual, the same severance payments and benefits described above, except that the Base Salary Continuation (and annual bonus in the case of Mr. Capp) and health continuation benefits will continue for Messrs. Lavan and Papanier (or would have continued for Mr. Capp) for the longer of: (1) the amount of time remaining until the end of the term of the employment agreement and (2) a period of 24 months following the termination date, and for Mr. Eaton, for 24 months. In addition, if Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier’s employment is terminated as a result of the applicable individual’s death or disability, the applicable individual (or their estate, if applicable) will be (or would have been, in the case of Mr. Capp) eligible to receive a pro-rated portion of their annual bonus payable under the Annual PFP for the year in which such termination of employment occurred.
For purposes of Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier’s employment agreements, “good reason” generally means (1) a material diminution in his base salary (or in the case of Mr. Lavan, a reduction in the amount of 15% or more), other than a general reduction in base salary that affects all similarly situated executives of Bally’s, (2) a material diminution in his responsibilities to Bally’s (or for Mr. Lavan, a material adverse change to his duties, reporting line or responsibilities) (in each NEO’s case, other than temporarily during periods of physical or mental incapacity or as required by applicable law), or (3) a relocation of his principal place of employment such that, for Messrs. Capp, Eaton and Papanier, the distance between his primary residence as of such relocation and his principal place of employment is increased by more than 50 miles, and for Mr. Lavan, his principal place of employment is more than 50 miles from its location at the date of hire.
33
For purposes of the employment agreements with Messrs. Papanier and Capp, a “change in control” is defined by reference to the definition included in the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan. A “change in control” for purposes of the employment agreements with Messrs. Lavan and Eaton is defined in Section 7(b)(ii) of his respective agreement. Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier’s right to receive the severance benefits set forth in their respective employment agreements is subject to their execution of an effective release of claims against Bally’s and its affiliates.
During the employment term and for the longer of the period of Base Salary Continuation or 12 months following the NEO’s termination date, Messrs. Capp, Eaton and Papanier will be subject to certain geographically-limited non-competition restrictions. During the employment term and for 12 months following his termination date, Mr. Lavan will also be subject to certain geographically-limited non-competition restrictions. Additionally, Messrs. Lavan, Capp, Eaton and Papanier will also be subject to certain non-solicitation, non-disparagement and non-disclosure restrictions.
With respect to the Fenton Service Agreement and the Reeves Service Agreement, each of Messrs. Fenton and Reeves is entitled to 12 months’ advance notice (the “Notice Period”) in the event that the Company decides to terminate their respective employment with the Company for any reason other than for cause as defined in the applicable agreement. Alternatively, in lieu of notice, the Company may elect to terminate either NEO’s employment immediately, in which case the applicable NEO will receive a payment equal to his base salary for the remainder of the Notice Period, which amount may be paid in a lump sum or in equal monthly installments during the remainder of the Notice Period, as elected by the Company in its discretion. The Fenton Service Agreement and the Reeves Service Agreement also require each NEO to seek alternative income during the Notice Period and to notify the Company of any such income received (in which case the installment payments will be reduced accordingly). In addition, Messrs. Fenton and Reeves will be entitled to payment for any unused and accrued paid time off for the year in which the termination occurs (unless the Company elects to require each NEO to use such accrued paid time off during the Notice Period).
Separation Agreements
Certain elements of compensation set forth in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table and 2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table reflect the terms of our separation agreement and release with Mr. Capp that was entered into on March 11, 2022 (the “Capp Separation Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Capp’s employment relationship with Bally’s terminated as of April 30, 2022. Pursuant to the Capp Separation Agreement, in exchange for Mr. Capp’s general release of claims against Bally’s and its affiliates, Bally’s provided Mr. Capp with the following amounts: (i) a payment equal to $275,000 (payable in two equal installments and less applicable withholding taxes); (ii) vesting of 4,270 of his unvested RSUs and 4,270 of his unvested PSUs, in each case, on April 30, 2022; (iii) reimbursement for his COBRA premiums for a 6-month period following his termination of employment; and (iv) a reduction in the length of Mr. Capp’s post-termination non-competition obligation (as set forth in his employment agreement) from 12 months to 6 months following his termination of employment. The Capp Separation Agreement also subjects Mr. Capp to certain non-solicitation, non-disparagement and non-disclosure restrictions.
Gamesys entered into a settlement agreement with Mr. Fenton on February 12, 2023 (the “Fenton Separation Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Fenton will remain on garden leave from February 12, 2023 until March 31, 2024, on which date his employment relationship will terminate with Gamesys (such period of time, the “Garden Leave Period”). Pursuant to the Fenton Separation Agreement, in exchange for Mr. Fenton’s waiver of claims against Gamesys and its affiliates: (i) Mr. Fenton will continue to receive base salary payments and other contractual benefits during the Garden Leave Period (with such salary payments to be converted from U.S. dollars into sterling pounds (GBP) based on the applicable exchange rate); (ii) Gamesys agrees to provide (A) payment of reasonable legal fees (up to a maximum of £2,500.00 plus VAT) incurred by Mr. Fenton in obtaining advice on the termination of his employment and the terms of the Fenton Separation Agreement and (B) reimbursement for any reasonable expenses properly incurred by Mr. Fenton during the Garden Leave Period (in accordance with Gamesys policies); and (iii) Mr. Fenton will vest in one-third of his Bally’s RSUs (granted in October 2021) on December 31, 2023, 25% of his Bally’s PSUs (granted in October 2021) for the 2022 performance period, and 100% of his Bally’s
34
PSUs (granted in October 2021) for the 2023 performance period. The Fenton Separation Agreement also subjects Mr. Fenton to certain non-disparagement and non-disclosure restrictions.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table
The chart below outlines the potential payments to our NEOs upon the occurrence of certain termination triggering events. As required, the amounts quantified in the chart below reflect the theoretical potential payments and benefits to which the NEOs would have been entitled to upon termination of employment or service, or in connection with a change in control, had the applicable event occurred on December 30, 2022.
| Name | Termination without Justifiable Cause or for Good Reason | Termination for Death or Disability | Termination without Justifiable Cause or for Good Reason in Connection with a Change in Control | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($) | ($) | ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lee D. Fenton | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash Severance | 2,200,000 | (1) | 2,200,000 | (1) | 2,200,000 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 2,547,385 | (4) | 1,045,493 | (4) | 2,547,385 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 4,747,385 | 3,245,493 | 4,747,385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robert Lavan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash Severance | 1,050,000 | (1) | 525,000 | (2) | 1,575,000 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Health Benefits | 17,709 | (3) | — | 35,418 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 1,219,138 | (4) | 489,752 | (4) | 1,219,138 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 2,286,847 | 1,014,752 | 2,829,556 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Craig L. Eaton | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash Severance | 700,000 | (1) | 300,000 | (2) | 1,100,000 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Health Benefits | 30,507 | (3) | — | 61,014 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | — | (4) | 407,090 | (4) | 407,090 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 730,507 | 707,090 | 1,568,104 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| George T. Papanier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash Severance | 1,900,000 | (1) | 950,000 | (2) | 2,850,000 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Health Benefits | 30,452 | (3) | — | 60,904 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 1,109,311 | (4) | 739,541 | (4) | 1,109,311 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 3,039,763 | 1,689,541 | 4,020,215 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Robeson M. Reeves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash Severance | 1,625,413 | (1) | 1,625,413 | (1) | 1,625,413 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 2,594,855 | (4) | 938,902 | (4) | 2,594,855 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 4,220,268 | 2,564,315 | 4,220,268 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
35
| (1) | Assuming that a termination occurred on December 30, 2022, (a) Messrs. Papanier and Eaton are each entitled to receive continued annual base salary payments for the longer of the remainder of the initial term of his employment agreement (as amended, if applicable) or 12 months following termination plus a pro-rata portion of his earned bonus under the Annual PFP for 2022, (b) Mr. Lavan is entitled to receive continued annual base salary payments for 12 months following termination, plus a pro-rata portion of his earned bonus under the Annual PFP for 2022 and monthly COBRA benefits for 12 months following termination, and (c) Messrs. Fenton and Reeves are each entitled to receive either 12 months’ notice of a termination of employment by the Company or payment in lieu of notice equal to 12 months of annual base salary payments, as well as a pro-rata portion of his target annual bonus for the year in which the termination occurs and payment for any accrued and unused paid time off (to the extent not required to be taken during the notice period). For purposes of these calculations, (i) target-level bonus amounts are reflected as earned bonuses under the Annual PFP for 2022 and (i) it is assumed (for Messrs. Fenton and Reeves) that the Company exercised its right to terminate each such NEO’s employment and make the required payment in lieu of notice as set forth in the applicable employment agreement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (2) | Upon a termination of employment as a result of death or disability, each of Messrs. Lavan, Eaton and Papanier would receive a pro-rata payment of his earned Annual PFP for 2022. For purposes of these calculations, target-level bonus amounts are reflected as earned bonuses under the Annual PFP for 2022. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (3) | Represents estimated costs to Bally’s of continued health benefits for 12 months. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (4) | Upon termination of employment due to death or disability (other than for “cause” or as a result of the NEO’s termination of his employment without “good reason”), each NEO would vest in the “next-tranche” of his unvested time-based RSUs (30,398 RSUs for Mr. Fenton, 13,748 RSUs for Mr. Lavan, 19,080 RSUs for Mr. Papanier, and 24,669 RSUs for Mr. Reeves). The RSUs granted to Messrs. Fenton and Reeves on October 1, 2021 will vest in full upon a termination without “cause” or a termination by the NEO for “good reason.” The RSUs granted to Messrs. Papanier in 2021 and the RSUs granted to Messrs. Fenton and Reeves on November 4, 2021 will fully vest only upon a termination without “cause.” Upon termination of employment without “cause” or due to the NEO’s disability, or as a result of the NEO’s termination of his employment without for “good reason,” the number of PSUs eligible to vest in respect of the applicable performance periods would also vest, assuming performance at actual performance levels (equal to 19,080 PSUs for Mr. Papanier). Upon termination of employment due to the NEO’s death, any PSUs earned in respect of the prior and current performance periods will vest assuming target performance levels (but will be pro-rated for the performance period in which death occurs based on the length of the NEO’s service during such period), and unvested PSUs for subsequent performance periods will be forfeited. The total number of accelerated RSUs and PSUs was multiplied by $19.38 per share, the closing price of Bally’s common shares on the NYSE on December 30, 2022 (December 31, 2022 was not a trading day). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (5) | Assuming that a termination occurred on December 30, 2022 and that such termination occurred within one year following a change in control, (a) Mr. Lavan would have received continued payments of annual base salary for the longer of the remainder of the initial term of his employment agreement or 24 months following termination plus his earned bonus under the Annual PFP for 2022; (b) Mr. Eaton would have received continued annual base salary payments for 24 months following termination plus his earned bonus under the Annual PFP for 2022 and monthly COBRA premiums for the applicable severance period; and (c) Mr. Papanier would have received continued annual base salary payments for the longer of the remainder of the initial term of his employment agreement or 24 months following termination plus his earned bonus under the Annual PFP for 2022. For purposes of these calculations, target-level bonus amounts are reflected as earned bonuses under the Annual PFP for 2022. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (6) | Represents estimated costs to Bally’s of continued health benefits for 24 months. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (7) | Assumes a change in control date of December 30, 2022 and that no “replacement award” is provided to the award holder in connection with such change in control. The amount shown represents the accelerated vesting of all time-based RSUs (60,796 RSUs for Mr. Fenton, 25,692 RSUs for Mr. Lavan, 19,080 RSUs for Mr. Papanier, and 49,339 RSUs for Mr. Reeves) and the accelerated vesting of all outstanding and unearned PSUs (assuming target level achievement) for the applicable performance period(s) (equal to 70,648 PSUs for Mr. Fenton, 37,215 PSUs for Mr. Lavan, 38,160 PSUs for Mr. Papanier and 56,518 PSUs for Mr. Reeves). The total number of accelerated RSUs and PSUs was multiplied by $19.38 per share, the closing price of Bally’s common shares on the NYSE on December 30, 2022 (December 31, 2022 was not a trading day). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
36
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The table below presents information as of December 31, 2022 with respect to shares issuable under our equity compensation plans:
| Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights(1) | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights(2) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column)(3) | |||||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 716,460 | $ | — | 6,218,080 | ||||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | 716,460 | $ | — | 6,218,080 | ||||||||||||||||
__________________________________
| (1) | Includes an aggregate 654,327 unvested RSUs and 62,133 unvested PSUs (based on target performance for the PSUs) outstanding at December 31, 2022. The number of shares reported for the PSUs may overstate dilution. | ||||
| (2) | Represents weighted-average exercise price of stock options outstanding under the plans. The weighted-average exercise price does not apply to restricted shares, RSUs or PSUs because there is no exercise price associated with such awards. | ||||
| (3) | With respect to PSUs, this column assumes that the target number of shares underlying the PSUs will be issued at the end of the relevant performance periods, and therefore all such shares have been excluded. As of December 31, 2022, the actual number of shares to be issued, if any, had not been determined and will be determined based on the relevant performance criteria over the applicable performance periods. Includes 2,977,223 shares available for issuance from the Bally’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | ||||
CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of Mr. Fenton, who served as Chief Executive Officer for 2022, and the annual total compensation of all of our employees. We believe this pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
For purposes of determining the median employee in respect of 2022, we determined that as of December 31, 2022, the employee population of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries consisted of approximately 10,500 employees as reflected in our internal payroll records excluding the Chief Executive Officer for 2022. This population included full-time, part-time and seasonal employees employed by us on that date. Approximately 19% of our employee population is located outside of the US.
To identify our median employee from this population for 2022, we used cash compensation paid during 2022, consisting of base wages for salaried employees and gross cash compensation paid to non-salaried employees, including hourly pay and other cash-based wages, such as tip income. We used the average exchange rate for the 12-month period ended December 31, 2022 to convert each non-U.S. employee’s total compensation to U.S. dollars. We did not make any assumptions or estimates with respect to total annual compensation. We did not annualize cash compensation for any employees who were hired or furloughed during 2022. We then calculated the compensation for our median employee based upon the same components of compensation used to determine Mr. Fenton’s pay for purposes of Summary Compensation Table disclosure. We determined that the median employee’s annual total compensation for 2022 was $50,077 and the annual total compensation of our CEO was $2,263,388 as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Based on this information, for 2022 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Fenton to the annual total compensation of the median employee was 45 to 1.
Because the SEC rules for identifying the median employee of the annual total compensation of our employees and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to our pay ratio, as other companies may utilize different methodologies in calculating their pay ratios.
37
Pay Versus Performance
| Year | Lee Fenton | George Papanier | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non‑PEO Named Executive Officers | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non‑PEO Named Executive Officers (2) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | Net Income (Loss) (5) | Adjusted EBITDA (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (2) | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (2) | Total Shareholder Return (3) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | $ | ( | $ | — | $ | — | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Mr. Fenton Mr. Papanier
(2) For each of 2022, 2021 and 2020 (each, a “Covered Year”), the values included in this column for the compensation actually paid to our PEOs and the average compensation actually paid to our Non-PEO NEOs for purposes of this Pay Versus Performance table (“PVP Table”):
| Compensation Actually Paid represents the Summary Compensation Table Totals adjusted for the following items: | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
For Lee Fenton: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| — | Summary Compensation Table “Stock Awards” value | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | — | |||||||||||||
| + | Year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in covered year that are outstanding and unvested as of the Covered Year-end | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| — | Year-over-year change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the Covered Year-end | ( | — | |||||||||||||||||
| — | Year-over-year change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that vested in Covered Year | ( | — | |||||||||||||||||
For George Papanier: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| — | Summary Compensation Table “Stock Awards” value | $ | — | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||||
| + | Year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in covered year that are outstanding and unvested as of the Covered Year-end | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| — | Year-over-year change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the Covered Year-end | — | ( | |||||||||||||||||
| + | Vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| — | Year-over-year change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that vested in Covered Year | — | ||||||||||||||||||
For Non-PEO NEOs (Average): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| — | Summary Compensation Table “Stock Awards” value | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||||
| + | Year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in covered year that are outstanding and unvested as of the Covered Year-end | |||||||||||||||||||
| — | Year-over-year change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the Covered Year-end | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||
| + | Vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year | |||||||||||||||||||
| — | Year-over-year change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that vested in Covered Year | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||
(3) For each Covered Year, our total shareholder return was calculated as the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, measured as the quotient of (a) the sum of (i) the cumulative amount of dividends for a period beginning with our closing price on NYSE on December 31, 2019 through and including the last day of the fiscal year covered (the “Measurement Period”), assuming dividend reinvestment, plus (ii) the difference between our closing stock price at the end versus the beginning of the Measurement Period, divided by (b) our closing share price at the beginning of the Measurement Period. Each of these yearly percentage changes was then applied to a deemed fixed investment of $100 at the beginning of the Measurement Period to produce the Covered Year-end values of such investment as of the end of 2022, 2021 and 2020, as applicable. Because Covered Years are presented in the table in reverse chronological order (from top to bottom), the table should be read from bottom to top for purposes of understanding cumulative returns over time.
(4) For purposes of this pay versus performance disclosure, our peer group is the Dow Jones US Gambling Index (the “Peer Group”). For each Covered Year, our peer group cumulative total shareholder return was calculated based on a deemed fixed investment of $100 through the Measurement Period, assuming all dividends were reinvested.
(5) Amounts represent net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year and is calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
38
(6) Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings for the Company, before interest expense, net of interest income, provision (benefit) for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-operating income, acquisition and other transaction related costs, share-based compensation and certain other gains or losses.
The following table lists the only two financial performance measures that we use to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs for fiscal 2022 to our performance:
| Most Important Financial Performance Measures | ||
39
40
PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte and Touche, LLP (“Deloitte”) has served as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company since 2015, and has been appointed by the Audit Committee to continue as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023.
In the event that the shareholders do not ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will review its selection of auditors and a change in its selection may or may not occur. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the fiscal year without resubmitting the matter to shareholders for ratification.
A Deloitte representative is expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and respond to appropriate questions.
The Audit Committee considered whether Deloitte’s provision of any professional services, other than its audits of our annual financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, reviews of quarterly financial statements and other audit-related services, is compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by Deloitte in connection with services rendered during the last two fiscal years.
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| Fee Category | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Audit Fees | $ | 5,794,625 | $ | 3,870,000 | ||||||||||
| Audit Related Fees | 683,222 | 715,000 | ||||||||||||
| Tax Fees | 928,812 | 1,209,050 | ||||||||||||
| All Other Fees | 1,895 | 1,895 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 7,408,554 | $ | 5,795,945 | ||||||||||
Audit Fees consists of fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, including fees related to the review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, and services that are normally provided by Deloitte in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Fees consists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include, assurance engagements related to the Company’s filings with the SEC, private placements under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, accounting consultations and reviews and due diligence in connection with acquisitions, attest services that are not required by law and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
41
Tax Fees consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal and state tax compliance, tax audit defense and mergers and acquisitions.
All Other Fees consists of fees for services other than the services reported above. In 2022 and 2021, we utilized Deloitte for a subscription to an online accounting research tool.
We did not incur any other audit and non-audit fees in 2022 and 2021.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
The Board adopted a pre-approval policy that provides guidelines for the audit, audit-related, tax and other permissible non-audit services that may be provided by the independent auditors. The policy identifies the guiding principles that must be considered by the Audit Committee in approving services to ensure that the auditors’ independence is not impaired. Under the policy, the Audit Committee annually, and from time to time, pre-approves the audit engagement fees and terms of all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022.
42
PROPOSAL 3
APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
As required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, to approve the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The Board has adopted a policy providing for annual “say-on-pay” advisory votes. Although the vote is non-binding, the Board and Compensation Committee will review and consider the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
We believe that NEO compensation should be focused on promoting Company performance and shareholder value. To achieve these goals, our NEO compensation program emphasizes pay for performance and aligning the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders through the use of long-term incentives and the encouragement of equity ownership. In addition, our NEO compensation program is designed to allow us to recruit, retain and motivate employees who play a significant role in our current and future success. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above and the related tables and narratives for more information about the compensation of our NEOs.
The vote on this proposal is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the overall compensation of our NEOs. This vote is advisory only and is not binding. Although the vote is non-binding, our Board and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders, and our Board and Compensation Committee expect to consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs. At our 2022 Annual Meeting, our shareholders voted in favor of us to hold a “say-on-pay” vote annually. As a result of that advisory vote, we are holding a “say-on-pay” vote this year and we expect to hold the next “say-on-pay” vote in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2024.
For the reasons discussed above, the Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote in favor of the following resolution:
“Resolved, that the shareholders approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other related disclosures in this Proxy Statement.”
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON YOUR PROXY, YOUR SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
43
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE*
The Board has appointed an Audit Committee composed of three non-employee directors: Ms. Wilson (Chair), Mr. Patel and Mr. Rollins. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined under the NYSE listing standards. The Board has determined that Ms. Wilson is an “audit committee financial expert” under applicable rules of the SEC, and the members of the Audit Committee satisfy the NYSE financial literacy standards.
The Audit Committee is responsible for providing independent oversight of the Company’s accounting functions and internal controls. The Audit Committee oversees Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board, reviews financial disclosures, and meets privately, outside of the presence of management, with the Company’s internal auditor and with representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also selects and appoints the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviews the independent registered public accounting firm’s fees. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 with the Company’s management and with Deloitte & Touche, LLP (“Deloitte”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also reviewed the report of management contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC, as well as Deloitte’s report included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K related to its audit of (1) the consolidated financial statements and (2) the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte its independence.
Based on the Audit Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 for filing with the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Wanda Y. Wilson (Chair)
Jaymin B. Patel
Jeffrey W. Rollins
* | The material in this report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC, and is not incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made on, before, or after the date of this proxy statement except as otherwise explicitly specified in any such filing. | ||||
44
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a written policy for the review, approval or ratification of Related Party Transactions by the Audit Committee of our Board. For this purpose, “Related Party Transactions” are transactions between us and related persons in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds or may be expected to exceed $120,000 and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Our policy regarding transactions between us and related persons provide that a related person is defined as a director, executive officer, nominee for director or greater than 5% beneficial owner of our common stock, in each case since the beginning of the most recently completed fiscal year, and any of their immediate family members. In considering such transactions, our Audit Committee considers the relevant facts and circumstances available to it regarding the transaction, including the material facts as to the related person’s relationship to or interest in the transaction.
PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS
Shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2024 (the “2024 Annual Meeting”) pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices not less than 120 calendar days before the anniversary date of the Company’s proxy statement released to shareholders in connection with the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, any shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices no later than December 6, 2023. Pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), notices of nomination for director by shareholders to be included in the proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, any nominations for director by shareholders to be included in the proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting must be received in writing by the Company at its principal executive offices no later than February 17, 2024 and no sooner than January 18, 2024.
Pursuant to the Bylaws, proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the 2024 Annual Meeting, but not included in the proxy statement, must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, any shareholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2024 Annual Meeting outside of Rule 14a-8 must be received in writing by the Company at its principal executive offices no later than February 17, 2024 and no sooner than January 18, 2024.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under the Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than 60 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, any shareholder proposals in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must be received in writing by the Company at its principal executive offices no later than March 18, 2024. If the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting changes by more than 30 calendar days from the date of the Annual Meeting, such notice must instead by provided by the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting or the 10th calendar day following public announcement by the Company of the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting.
45
OTHER MATTERS
Delivery of Proxy Materials to Households
SEC rules allow companies, brokers, banks or other intermediaries to deliver a single copy of an annual report, proxy statement or notice of internet availability of proxy materials to any household at which two or more shareholders reside. We believe this rule benefits everyone. It eliminates duplicate mailings that shareholders living at the same address receive, and it reduces our printing and mailing costs.
Shareholders sharing an address who have been previously notified by their broker, bank or other intermediary and have consented to householding, either affirmatively or implicitly by not objecting to householding, will receive only one copy of our annual report, proxy statement or notice of internet availability of proxy materials. If you would like to opt out of or into this practice for future mailings and receive separate or multiple annual reports, proxy statements or notice of internet availability of proxy materials for shareholders sharing the same address, please contact your broker, bank or other intermediary.
You may also obtain a separate annual report, proxy statement or notice of internet availability of proxy materials without charge by sending a written request to Bally’s Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, 100 Westminster Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, or by calling us at (401) 475-8474. We will promptly send additional copies of the annual report or proxy statement or notice of internet availability of proxy materials upon receipt of such request. Shareholders sharing an address who now receive multiple copies of our annual report, proxy statement or notice of internet availability of proxy materials may request delivery of a single copy by contacting us as indicated above, or by contacting their broker, bank or other intermediary. Householding does not apply to shareholders with shares registered directly in their name.
Solicitation
We will bear the cost of this solicitation of proxies, including the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the proxy, proxy statement and other material that may be sent to the shareholders in connection with this solicitation. Brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries may be requested to forward soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares, in which case they will be reimbursed by us for their expenses in doing so. Proxies are being solicited primarily by mail, but, in addition, our officers and regular employees may solicit proxies personally, by telephone, by telegram or by special letter. We will not pay any additional compensation to officers or other employees for such services, but may reimburse them for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.
Other Business
The Board does not intend to present to the Annual Meeting any other matter not referred to above and does not presently know of any matters that may be presented to the Annual Meeting by others. However, if other matters come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intent of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment.
| By Order of the Board of Directors | |||||
| BALLY’S CORPORATION | |||||
| Soohyung Kim | |||||
| Chairman of the Board of Directors | |||||
46