Churchill Downs Inc DEF 14A, filed Mar 12, 2026
Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN)
About this DEF 14A
Churchill Downs Inc filed this DEF 14A on March 12, 2026.
Table of Contents
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
| ☒ | No fee required. | |||
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
| ☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
Table of Contents
| DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS,
| ||||
| In 2025, we delivered exceptional record financial performance from our diversified portfolio of businesses, generating record net revenue of $2.9 billion, net income of $383.0 million, and record Adjusted EBITDA of $1.2 billion. | ||||
| Key Highlights
● Celebrated the 151st running of the Kentucky Derby:
— Achieved all-time wagering records and record peak viewership on NBC.
— Completed the new Starting Gate Pavilion and Courtyard.
— Renewed the NBC broadcast contract with significantly enhanced economics.
● Continued the expansion of our HRM businesses:
— Opened Owensboro Racing & Gaming in Owensboro, Kentucky, in February 2025.
— Expanded Rosie’s Richmond in Richmond, Virginia, in August 2025.
— Opened Roseshire Gaming Parlor in Henrico County, Virginia, in September 2025.
● Returned $456.3 million to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.
● Announced our 15th consecutive year of increased dividends per share.
We enter 2026 with strong momentum and a compelling slate of projects designed to enhance the Kentucky Derby experience, expand our HRM footprint, and generate long-term shareholder value.
Growth Initiatives:
● We continue to invest in and elevate the Derby as a week long event:
— The 152nd Kentucky Oaks will premier in primetime on NBC Friday evening, May 1, 2026, further strengthening Derby Week’s national reach.
— Renovations of the Finish Line Suites and The Mansion – two of our most exclusive hospitality areas – will debut for Derby Week in 2026.
— Victory Run, a new reserved seating structure featuring suites, covered seating, and elevated hospitality offerings, is scheduled to debut for the 2028 Kentucky Derby.
● We remain committed to expanding our historical horse racing machine entertainment venues and supporting the broader horse racing ecosystem:
— Opened Marshall Yards Racing & Gaming in Calvert City, Kentucky in February 2026.
— Continued development of Rockingham Grand Casino in Salem, New Hampshire.
Over the past several years, our team has demonstrated the ability to successfully execute high-return growth projects while maintaining a strong balance sheet and disciplined capital allocation. We remain focused on sustainable growth and delivering consistent long-term total shareholder return. On behalf of our Board of Directors and our entire team, we thank you for your continued investment in Churchill Downs Incorporated. | ||||
|
R. Alex Rankin Chairman of the Board |
William C. Carstanjen Chief Executive Officer |
Table of Contents
600 N. HURSTBOURNE PARKWAY, STE. 400
LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40222
| NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2026
Time: 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
Place: Via a live audio-only webcast at www.proxydocs.com/CHDN. |
Agenda:
I. To elect the two (2) Class III Directors identified in this Proxy Statement for a term of three (3) years (Proposal No. 1);
II. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026 (Proposal No. 2);
III. To conduct an advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Proposal No. 3); and
IV. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, including matters incident to its conduct.
|
Record Date:
The close of business on March 2, 2026 has been fixed as the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Only shareholders of record at that time will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments thereof.
Voting:
| To attend and vote during the Annual Meeting, visit www.proxydocs.com/CHDN. All shareholders, including those who expect to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, are urged to vote prior to the Annual Meeting by telephone or Internet or by requesting and promptly signing and returning a proxy card, as more fully described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. |
|
|
|
Vote by Telephone | ||
|
|
|
|
Vote by Internet | |||
|
|
|
|
Vote by Mail |
March 12, 2026
By Order of the Board of Directors.
BRADLEY K. BLACKWELL
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel,
Secretary
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 21, 2026
The Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Annual Report to
Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 are available at
http://www.churchilldownsincorporated.com/proxy
Table of Contents
| TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
||||
| 1 | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
5 | |||
| 7 | ||||
| 8 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| Director Compensation for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025 |
13 | |||
| 14 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2026 (Proposal No. 2) | 21 | |||
| 22 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| Churchill Downs Incorporated Audit Committee Report | 23 | |||
| Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Proposal No. 3) | 25 | |||
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 26 | |||
| 27 | ||||
| 27 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
The letter to shareholders and the accompanying proxy statement contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “scheduled,” and similar words or similar expressions (or negative versions of such words or expressions), although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Important factors, that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations are described under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement
600 N. HURSTBOURNE PARKWAY, STE. 400
LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40222
| PROXY STATEMENT
|
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 21, 2026
The Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) of Churchill Downs Incorporated (“Company” “or “CHDN”) is soliciting proxies to be voted at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time (the “Annual Meeting”), and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only. You will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting online by visiting www.proxydocs.com/CHDN. Certain officers and directors of the Company and persons acting under their instruction may also solicit proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors by means of telephone calls, personal interviews and mail at no additional expense to the Company. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) was first mailed to shareholders on or about March 12, 2026.
Voting Rights
Only holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock, no par value (“Common Stock”), as of the close of business on March 2, 2026 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On that date, 69,696,376 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each shareholder has one vote per share on all matters coming before the Annual Meeting. The shareholders of the Company do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.
To ensure your votes are counted, please vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail as instructed in these materials as promptly as possible.
VOTING INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION
When and where is our virtual Annual Meeting?
We will hold our virtual Annual Meeting on Tuesday, April 21, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time online at www.proxydocs.com/CHDN.
How are we distributing our proxy materials?
In accordance with the “notice and access” rules and regulations adopted by the SEC, instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each shareholder of record (the “full set delivery” option), we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders over the Internet (the “notice only” option). A company may use either option, “notice only” or “full set delivery,” for all of its shareholders or may use one method for some shareholders and the other method for others. We believe the “notice only” process expedites shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials and reduces the costs and environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. The Company will bear the entire cost of the solicitation.
On or about March 12, 2026, we began mailing a Notice to our shareholders containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K and vote online, as well as instructions on how to receive paper copies of these documents for shareholders who so select. This Proxy Statement and the 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K are also available at http://www.churchilldownsincorporated.com/proxy.
Who can vote and ask questions at the Annual Meeting?
You are entitled to vote or direct the voting of your shares of CHDN Common Stock if you were a shareholder of record or if you held CHDN Common Stock in “street name” at the close of business on the Record Date (Monday, March 2, 2026). On that date, 69,696,376 shares of CHDN Common Stock were outstanding. Each share of CHDN Common Stock held by you on the Record Date is entitled to one vote.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
1 |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement
To vote during the Annual Meeting, you must be properly logged into the meeting website, as explained below under “What do I need to attend, and vote at, the Annual Meeting?” We will respond to questions submitted that are applicable to our business and otherwise in compliance with the rules of conduct for the meeting.
How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?
We must have a “quorum” to conduct the Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote, represented in person by virtual attendance or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum. Once a share is represented for any purpose at the Annual Meeting, it will be deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the Annual Meeting and for any adjournment of the Annual Meeting, unless a new record date must be set for the adjourned meeting.
What do I need to attend, and vote at, the Annual Meeting?
In order to attend the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/CHDN prior to the deadline of April 19, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time). Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link that will allow you access to the Annual Meeting and to submit questions prior to the Annual Meeting. Only CHDN shareholders of record as of the close of business on the Record Date will be permitted to attend the Annual Meeting. If you hold shares in “street name,” you will also need a valid “legal proxy” in order to vote at the Annual Meeting, which you can obtain by contacting your account representative at the broker, bank or similar institution through which you hold your shares. This legal proxy must be submitted with your registration to be able to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.
If you encounter any technical difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting log-in page.
What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
The following proposals from the Company will be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting:
| 1. | To elect the two (2) Class III Directors identified in this Proxy Statement for a term of three (3) years (Proposal No. 1); |
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026 (Proposal No. 2); and |
| 3. | To conduct an advisory vote to approve the executive compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (Proposal No. 3). |
You may also vote on any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, including matters incident to the Annual Meeting’s conduct.
How does the Board of Directors recommend I vote?
CHDN’s Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote:
| 1. | “FOR” each of the two (2) Class III director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement. |
| 2. | “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026. |
| 3. | “FOR” the proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the executive compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. |
| 2 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement
What vote is required to approve each proposal?
| Proposal |
Vote Required for Approval | Effect of Abstentions, Withhold Votes and Broker Non-Votes | ||
| Proposal No. 1
Election of Directors |
Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. The individuals nominated for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting receiving the highest number of “FOR” votes will be elected. | A withhold vote will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors. Broker discretionary voting is not permitted. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. Votes may not be cumulated. | ||
| Proposal No. 2
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock present virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such matter. | An abstention has the same effect as a vote “against” this proposal. Broker discretionary voting is permitted. Because broker discretionary voting is permitted, there will be no broker non-votes on this proposal. | ||
| Proposal No. 3
Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the executive compensation of the Company’s named executive officers |
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock present virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such matter. | An abstention has the same effect as a vote “against” this proposal. Broker discretionary voting is not permitted. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. | ||
How do I vote?
You may cast your vote in one of four ways:
| ● | By Submitting a Proxy by Internet. Go to the following website: www.proxypush.com/CHDN. You may submit a proxy by Internet 24 hours a day. To be valid, your proxy by Internet must be received by the time of the Annual Meeting. When you access the website, follow the instructions to create an electronic voting instruction form. |
| ● | By Submitting a Proxy by Telephone. To submit a proxy using the telephone, call 1-866-284-6863 any time on a touch-tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call in the United States or Canada. International calling charges apply outside the United States and Canada. You may submit a proxy by telephone 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Follow the simple prompts and instructions provided by the recorded message. To be valid, your proxy must be received by the time of the Annual Meeting. |
| ● | By Submitting a Proxy by Mail. If you have requested and received a proxy card by mail, mark your proxy card, sign and date it, and return it in the prepaid envelope that was provided or return it to: Proxy Tabulator for Churchill Downs Incorporated, P.O. Box 8016, Cary, North Carolina 27512-9903. To be valid, your proxy must be received by April 20, 2026. |
| ● | During the Annual Meeting. To vote during the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, you must first register at www.proxydocs.com/CHDN. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link that will allow you access to the Annual Meeting and to submit questions prior to the Annual Meeting. Please be sure to follow instructions found on your proxy card and/or voting authorization form and subsequent instructions that will be delivered to you via email. Shareholders will be able to attend the Annual Meeting platform with the webcast beginning at 8:45 a.m. (Eastern Time) on April 21, 2026 pursuant to the unique access instructions they receive following their registration at www.proxydocs.com/CHDN. |
How can I revoke my proxy or substitute a new proxy or change my vote?
You can revoke your proxy or substitute a new proxy by use of any of the following means:
For a Proxy Submitted by Internet or Telephone
| ● | Submitting in a timely manner a new proxy through the Internet or by telephone that is received prior to the time of the Annual Meeting; |
| ● | Requesting, executing and mailing a later-dated proxy card that is received by April 20, 2026; or |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
3 |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement
| ● | Voting during the virtual Annual Meeting. |
For a Proxy Submitted by Mail
| ● | Executing and mailing another proxy card bearing a later date that is received by April 20, 2026; |
| ● | Giving written notice of revocation to CHDN’s Secretary at 600 N. Hurstbourne Parkway, Ste. 400, Louisville, Kentucky 40222 that is received by CHDN by April 20, 2026; or |
| ● | Voting during the virtual Annual Meeting. |
What is a broker non-vote?
Brokers, banks or other nominees holding shares on behalf of a beneficial owner may vote those shares in their discretion on certain “routine” matters even if they do not receive timely voting instructions from the beneficial owner. With respect to “non-routine” matters, the broker, bank or other nominee is not permitted to vote shares for a beneficial owner without timely received voting instructions. The only routine matter to be presented at the Annual Meeting is the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026. The remaining proposals to be presented at the Annual Meeting are considered non-routine.
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee does not vote on a non-routine matter because the beneficial owner of such shares has not provided voting instructions with regard to such matter. If a broker, bank or other nominee exercises its discretionary voting authority on the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026, such shares will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for purposes and broker non-votes will occur as to each of the other proposals presented at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes will have no impact on the voting results of the election of directors or the other proposals to be presented at the Annual Meeting.
How will my shares be voted if I return a blank proxy card or a blank voting instruction card?
If you are a holder of record of shares of our Common Stock and you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted:
| 1. | “FOR” each of the two (2) Class III director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement. |
| 2. | “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026. |
| 3. | “FOR” the proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the executive compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. |
If you hold your shares in street name via a broker, bank or other nominee and return a signed but blank voting instruction card (and do not otherwise provide the broker, bank or other nominee with voting instructions), your shares:
| ● | will be counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum; |
| ● | will be voted in accordance with the broker’s, bank’s or other nominee’s discretion on “routine” matters, which includes only the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026; and |
| ● | will not be counted in connection with the election of directors, the proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the executive compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, or any other non-routine matters that are properly presented at the Annual Meeting. For each of these proposals, your shares will be treated as “broker non-votes.” |
Our Board knows of no matter to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals described above. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting upon which a vote properly may be taken, shares represented by all proxies received by us on the proxy card will be voted with respect thereto as permitted and in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders.
| 4 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information as of the Record Date (except as otherwise indicated below) regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock by the only persons known by the Company to beneficially own more than five percent (5%) of the Common Stock, each director and director nominee of the Company, each named executive officer (as defined in “Executive Compensation—2025 Summary Compensation Table” herein), and the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The percentage of beneficial ownership is calculated based on 69,696,376 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date. We are not aware of any pledge of our Common Stock or any other arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our Company.
| Name of Beneficial Owner |
Amount and Nature Of Beneficial Ownership |
Percent of Class | ||||||
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. and affiliates 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 |
6,723,558(1) | 9.65 | ||||||
| BlackRock, Inc. and affiliates 50 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 |
6,675,848(2) | 9.58 | ||||||
| Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Andréa Carter |
5,701(3) | * | ||||||
| Douglas C. Grissom |
39,983(4) | * | ||||||
| Daniel P. Harrington |
1,269,182(5) | 1.82 | ||||||
| Karole F. Lloyd |
38,060(6) | * | ||||||
| R. Alex Rankin |
99,211(7) | 0.14 | ||||||
| Paul C. Varga |
33,300(8) | * | ||||||
| Named Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| William C. Carstanjen |
1,685,609(9) | 2.42 | ||||||
| William E. Mudd |
732,067(10) | 1.05 | ||||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
153,843(11) | 0.22 | ||||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
30,934(12) | * | ||||||
| 10 Directors and Executive Officers as a Group |
4,087,890 | 5.87 | ||||||
| * | Less than 0.1%. |
| (1) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024, reporting the beneficial ownership of The Vanguard Group and its subsidiaries specified therein (“Vanguard”) as of December 29, 2023. As reported in such filing, Vanguard has sole voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over 6,629,885 shares, shared voting power over 29,927 shares and shared dispositive power over 93,673 shares. |
| (2) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on April 24, 2025, reporting the beneficial ownership of BlackRock, Inc. and its subsidiaries specified therein (“BlackRock”) as of March 31, 2025. As reported in such filing, BlackRock has sole voting power over 6,486,849 shares, sole dispositive power over 6,675,848 shares and no shared voting or dispositive power over any shares. |
| (3) | Includes 870 deferred stock units, which Ms. Carter has elected to defer pursuant to the Company’s deferred compensation plan. Also includes 3,572 restricted stock units awarded by the Company for her board service, over which Ms. Carter has neither voting nor dispositive power until immediately following her resignation or retirement from the Board. |
| (4) | Includes 12,223 deferred stock units, which Mr. Grissom has elected to defer pursuant to the Company’s deferred compensation plan. Also includes 18,069 restricted stock units awarded by the Company for his board service, over which Mr. Grissom has neither voting nor dispositive power until immediately following his resignation or retirement from the Board. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
5 |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement
| (5) | Mr. Harrington shares voting and investment power with respect to 1,145,352 shares held by TVI Corp. He specifically disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Amount in chart includes 72,069 deferred stock units, which Mr. Harrington has elected to defer pursuant to the Company’s deferred compensation plan. Also includes 51,761 restricted stock units awarded by the Company for his board service, over which Mr. Harrington has neither voting nor dispositive power until immediately following his resignation or retirement from the Board. Amount in chart does not include 195,204 shares held by the Veale Foundation. Mr. Harrington is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Veale Foundation, but Mr. Harrington disclaims beneficial ownership of those shares. |
| (6) | Includes 2,339 restricted stock awards that will vest within 60 days of March 2, 2026 and 13,233 restricted stock unit awards, over which Ms. Lloyd has neither voting nor dispositive power until immediately following her resignation or retirement from the Board. |
| (7) | Includes 51,761 restricted stock units awarded by the Company for his board service, over which Mr. Rankin has neither voting nor dispositive power until immediately following his resignation or retirement from the Board. |
| (8) | Includes 10,241 restricted stock units awarded by the Company for his board service, over which Mr. Varga has neither voting nor dispositive power until immediately following his resignation or retirement from the Board. |
| (9) | Excludes 70,900 restricted stock units and 7,803 shares deferred under the Company’s Deferral Plan. Excludes 105,706 restricted stock units, tied to Mr. Carstanjen’s continued service to the Company, over which Mr. Carstanjen has neither voting nor dispositive power until December 31, 2026, at which time 46,787 units shall vest without restriction; December 31, 2027, at which time 37,572 units shall vest without restriction; and December 31, 2028, at which time 21,347 units shall vest without restriction. Excludes 76,317 performance stock units awarded under the Company’s executive long term incentive compensation plan over which Mr. Carstanjen has neither voting nor dispositive power until December 31, 2026, at which time the performance period ends with regard to 27,643 performance stock units; and December 31, 2027, at which time the performance period ends with regard to 48,674 performance stock units. Further excludes all performance stock units to be awarded to Mr. Carstanjen under the Company’s executive long-term incentive compensation plan for the performance period of January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2028. |
| (10) | Excludes 36,232 restricted stock units, tied to Mr. Mudd’s continued service to the Company, over which Mr. Mudd has neither voting nor dispositive power until December 31, 2026, at which time 16,591 units shall vest without restriction; December 31, 2027, at which time 12,525 units shall vest without restriction; and December 31, 2028, at which time 7,116 units shall vest without restriction. Excludes 28,421 performance stock units awarded under the Company’s executive long term incentive compensation plan over which Mr. Mudd has neither voting nor dispositive power until December 31, 2026, at which time the performance period ends with regard to 12,196 performance stock units; and December 31, 2027, at which time the performance period ends with regard to 16,225 performance stock units. Further excludes all performance stock units to be awarded to Mr. Mudd under the Company’s executive long-term incentive compensation plan for the performance period of January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2028. |
| (11) | Excludes 10,860 restricted stock units deferred under the Company’s Deferral Plan. Excludes 21,478 restricted stock units, tied to Ms. Dall’s continued service to the Company, over which Ms. Dall has neither voting nor dispositive power until December 31, 2026, at which time 10,184 units shall vest without restriction; December 31, 2027, at which time 7,202 units shall vest without restriction; and December 31, 2028, at which time 4,092 units shall vest without restriction. Excludes 18,274 performance stock units awarded under the Company’s executive long term incentive compensation plan over which Ms. Dall has neither voting nor dispositive power until December 31, 2026, at which time the performance period ends with regard to 8,944 performance stock units; and December 31, 2027, at which time the performance period ends with regard to 9,330 performance stock units. Further excludes all performance stock units to be awarded to Ms. Dall under the Company’s executive long-term incentive compensation plan for the performance period of January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2028. |
| (12) | Excludes 15,164 restricted stock units, tied to Mr. Blackwell’s continued service to the Company, over which Mr. Blackwell has neither voting nor dispositive power until December 31, 2026, at which time 6,815 units shall vest without restriction; December 31, 2027, at which time 5,324 units shall vest without restriction; and December 31, 2028, at which time 3,025 units shall vest without restriction. Excludes 11,368 performance stock units awarded under the Company’s executive long term incentive compensation plan over which Mr. Blackwell has neither voting nor dispositive power until December 31, 2026, at which time the performance period ends with regard to 4,472 performance stock units; and December 31, 2027, at which time the performance period ends with regard to 6,896 performance stock units. Further excludes all performance stock units to be awarded to Mr. Blackwell under the Company’s executive long-term incentive compensation plan for the performance period of January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2028. |
| 6 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Company’s executive officers, as listed below, are elected annually to their executive offices and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.
| Name and Age |
Position(s) With Company and Term of Office | |
| William C. Carstanjen(1) Age: 58 |
Chief Executive Officer since August 2014; President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2011 to August 2014; Chief Operating Officer from January 2009 to March 2011; Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer from June 2005 to January 2009; General Counsel from June 2005 to December 2006 | |
| William E. Mudd(2) Age: 54 |
President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2015; President and Chief Financial Officer from August 2014 to October 2015; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from October 2007 to August 2014 | |
| Marcia A. Dall(3) Age: 62 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2015 | |
| Bradley K. Blackwell(4) Age: 54 |
Executive Vice President and General Counsel since February 2023; Senior Vice President and General Counsel from March 2017 to February 2023; Vice President, Operations from February 2015 to March 2017; Vice President, Legal from April 2011 to February 2015; Vice President, Legal and Regulatory Affairs for TwinSpires from January 2007 to April 2011; Corporate Counsel from April 2005 to January 2007 | |
| (1) | Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Carstanjen was employed at General Electric Company (“GE”). From 2004 through June 2005, he served as the Managing Director and General Counsel of GE Commercial Finance, Energy Financial Services. From 2002 to 2004, he served as General Counsel of GE Specialty Materials and, from 2000 to 2002, he served as Transactions and Finance Counsel of GE Worldwide Headquarters. Mr. Carstanjen began his career as an attorney with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions. |
| (2) | Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mudd was employed at GE. From 2006 through October 2007, he served as Chief Financial Officer, Global Commercial & Americas P&L of GE Infrastructure, Water & Process Technologies. From 2004 to 2006, he served as Chief Financial Officer, Supply Chain, Information Technology and Technology Finance, GE Consumer & Industrial Europe, Middle East, & Africa, Budapest and Hungary and, from 2002 to 2004, he served as Manager, Global Financial Planning & Analysis and Business Development at GE FANUC in Charlottesville, Virginia. |
| (3) | Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Dall was employed at Erie Indemnity Company, a company providing sales, underwriting and administrative services to Erie Insurance Exchange, where from March 2009 through October 2015, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From January 2008 until March 2009, she served as Chief Financial Officer of the Healthcare division at CIGNA Corporation. Prior to CIGNA, Ms. Dall was a corporate officer and the Chief Financial Officer for the International and U.S. Mortgage Insurance segments of Genworth Financial, a former subsidiary of GE. Ms. Dall began her career in 1985 in the Financial Management Program at GE and held various leadership roles both in finance and operations over her twenty-plus year tenure with GE. Ms. Dall is a Certified Public Accountant. |
| (4) | Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Blackwell served as Assistant General Counsel and Secretary at Michaels Stores, Inc. (“Michaels”), a NYSE publicly traded specialty retailer with over 1,000 stores across 49 states, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Prior to Michaels, Mr. Blackwell served as an attorney with Jones Day in Dallas, Texas, focusing on mergers and acquisitions and corporate counseling. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
7 |
Table of Contents
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
| ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (Proposal No. 1)
|
At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote to elect the two (2) persons identified below to serve in Class III of the Board of Directors and to hold office for a term of three (3) years expiring at the 2029 annual meeting of shareholders and thereafter until their respective successors shall be duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of their resignation, death or removal.
The Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company provide that the Board of Directors shall be composed of not fewer than three (3) nor more than fifteen (15) members, the exact number to be established by the Board of Directors, and further provide for the division of the Board of Directors into three (3) approximately equal classes, of which one (1) class is elected annually to a three (3) year term. Currently, the Board of Directors is comprised of seven (7) directors, with three (3) directors in Class I, two (2) directors in Class II, and two (2) directors in Class III.
The Nominating and Governance Committee has recommended, and the Board has approved, the nomination of the two (2) persons named in the following table for election as directors in Class III. The nominees currently serve as directors in Class III and have agreed to serve if re-elected.
Directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast by the shares entitled to vote in the election at a meeting at which a quorum is present. With each shareholder having one vote per share to cast for each director position, the nominees receiving the greatest number of “FOR” votes will be elected. The biographical information for our directors and director nominees below includes information regarding certain of the experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills that led to the determination that such individuals are qualified to serve on the Board of Directors.
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each director in Class III named below. |
| 8 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
Election of Directors
The following table sets forth information relating to the Class III director nominees of the Company who are proposed to the shareholders for election to serve as directors for a term of three (3) years, expiring at the 2029 annual meeting of shareholders, and thereafter until their respective successors shall be duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of their resignation, death or removal.
Class III—Nominated for Terms Expiring in 2029(1)(2)
| Douglas C. Grissom | ||
|
Age: 58 Director since 2017 |
Background, Skills and Experience
Mr. Grissom is a Senior Advisor on Madison Dearborn Partners’ (“MDP”) Technology & Government Solutions team. Prior to February 2024, Mr. Grissom served as a Managing Director on MDP’s Business & Government Software and Services team. Prior to joining MDP, he was with Bain Capital, McKinsey & Company, and Goldman Sachs. Through MDP, Doug has previously served on the Board of Directors at @stake, Aderant, Asurion, BlueCat Networks, Cbeyond, CoVant Technologies, Fieldglass, Fleet Complete, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, Intelsat, LGS Innovations, Lightspeed Systems, LinQuest Corporation, and Neoworld. Outside MDP, he is a Board Member at Amherst College, Endeavor Southeast, Harvard Business School Fund Council, Harvard Business School Midwest Advisory Board, James Graham Brown Foundation, Kentucky Squash Racquets Association, Louisville Brands, Louisville Squash Plus, Princeton Theological Seminary, and the West End School.
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Grissom has extensive financial and board experience within a variety of industries. Mr. Grissom also has extensive private equity, mergers and acquisitions, and finance experience through his years of experience as an investment banker, consultant, and investor. | |
| Daniel P. Harrington | ||
|
Age: 70 Director since 1998 |
Background, Skills and Experience
Mr. Harrington serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of HTV Industries, Inc., a private holding company with diversified business interests that include manufacturing, distribution, technology, and banking. Mr. Harrington also serves as a Trustee of The Veale Foundation. Previously, Mr. Harrington has served as a Director of First Guaranty Bank, First State Financial Corporation, and Portec Rail Products, Inc. (serving on its Audit and Compensation Committees).
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Harrington has extensive financial, accounting, and chief executive experience within a variety of industries. He also has board, compensation, and audit experience, including serving for years as the Audit Chair for the Company and qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert. | |
| (1) | Except as noted with respect to Mr. Grissom, there has been no change in principal occupation or employment of any Class III director during the past 5 years. |
| (2) | Summaries above include directorships at any time within the last 5 years in companies with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, in the case of certain nominees, other present or former directorships or positions considered significant by them. |
The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unavailable to serve as a director. If any nominee should become unavailable before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy, or their substitutes, reserve the right to vote for substitute nominees selected by the Board of Directors.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
9 |
Table of Contents
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
Continuing Directors
The following tables set forth information relating to the Class I and Class II directors of the Company who will continue to serve as directors until the expiration of their respective terms of office and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
Class I—Terms Expiring in 2027(1)(2)
| William C. Carstanjen | ||
|
Age: 58 Director since 2015 |
Background, Skills and Experience
Mr. Carstanjen was named the Company’s twelfth Chief Executive Officer in August 2014 and appointed to the Board of Directors in July 2015. Mr. Carstanjen served as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer (2011-2014), the Company’s Chief Operating Officer (2009-2011) and as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Development Officer for the Company (2005-2009). Mr. Carstanjen joined the Company in July 2005 after serving as an executive with General Electric Company. Mr. Carstanjen began his career as an attorney with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City, specializing in mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance, and corporate governance. Mr. Carstanjen brings a wealth of experience and knowledge to his leadership role at the Company. Throughout his tenure, Mr. Carstanjen has led the Company’s diversification strategy into its online business lines, historical horse racing operations and regional casino gaming, as well as led the growth of the Kentucky Oaks and Kentucky Derby events. Mr. Carstanjen is a Director of Glenview Trust Company and the American Gaming Association.
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Carstanjen has many years of leadership, strategy, mergers and acquisition, corporate finance, corporate governance and legal experience. He brings a wealth of experience and knowledge through his leadership roles at the Company. | |
| Karole F. Lloyd | ||
|
Age: 67 Director since 2018 |
Background, Skills and Experience
Mrs. Lloyd was elected to the Board of Directors in 2018 and serves as Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee. Mrs. Lloyd has served on the Board of Directors of Aflac Inc. since January 2017 and is chair of the Audit and Risk Committee and a member of the Executive Committee, Finance and Investment Committee, and Corporate Development Committee of the Aflac Inc. Board of Directors. Mrs. Lloyd is the retired Vice Chair and Southeast Regional Managing Partner for Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”). From 2009 through 2016, she served as a member of the US Executive Board, Americas Operating Executive, and the Global Practice Group for EY. In her 37-year career at EY, Mrs. Lloyd served many of EY’s clients through mergers, IPOs, acquisitions, divestitures, and across numerous industries including banking, insurance, consumer products, healthcare, transportation, real estate, manufacturing, and retail. Mrs. Lloyd has been active in the Atlanta community, working with the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce and The Rotary Club of Atlanta. She was previously the Chair of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra Board of Directors. Mrs. Lloyd is active in supporting many colleges and universities throughout the southeast, including serving on the President’s Advisory Council and the Board of Visitors at the University of Alabama. Mrs. Lloyd received her NACD cyber-risk oversight certification in 2022.
Key Qualifications and Experience
Ms. Lloyd has extensive accounting and advisory experience that includes financial reporting, regulatory compliance, internal audit, and risk management to go along with her leadership skills. She also brings experience from serving as a public company board member and qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert. | |
| 10 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
| Paul C. Varga | ||
|
Age: 62 Director since 2020 |
Background, Skills and Experience
Mr. Varga was appointed to the Board of Directors on February 25, 2020. Mr. Varga served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brown-Forman Corporation, a public global spirits and wine company, from August 2007 until his retirement in December 2018. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Brown-Forman Beverages, a division of Brown-Forman Corporation, from 2003 to 2007, and as Global Chief Marketing Officer for Brown-Forman Spirits from 2000 to 2003. Mr. Varga currently serves on the Board of Directors of Macy’s, Inc. as Lead Independent Director and as a member of both the Compensation and Management Development Committee and Finance Committee. He previously served on the Board of Directors of Brown-Forman Corporation from 2003 until July 2019.
Key Qualifications and Experience
In addition to Mr. Varga’s many years of leadership experience in the role of chief executive officer and as a public company board member, he also has considerable expertise and experience in corporate finance, strategy, building brand awareness, product development, marketing, distribution, and sales. | |
| (1) | There has been no change in principal occupation or employment of any Class I director during the past 5 years. |
| (2) | Summaries above include directorships at any time within the last 5 years in companies with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, in the case of certain nominees, other present or former directorships or positions considered significant by them. |
Class II—Terms Expiring in 2028(1)(2)
| R. Alex Rankin | ||
|
Age: 70 Director since 2008 |
Background, Skills and Experience
Mr. Rankin is the Chairman of the Board of Sterling G. Thompson Company, LLC, a private insurance agency and broker, and the President of Upson Downs Farm, Inc., a thoroughbred breeding and racing operation. He is also Vice Chairman and Director of Glenview Trust Company, a private Trust and Investment Management Company, and a member and former Steward of The Jockey Club. Mr. Rankin is a former Trustee and Chairman of the James Graham Brown Foundation, a private, non-profit foundation that fosters the well-being, quality of life, and image of Louisville and Kentucky by actively supporting and funding projects in the fields of civic affairs, economic development, education, and health and general welfare, which since 1954 has awarded over 3,200 grants totaling over $620 million.
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Rankin has expertise in finance and risk management. He also has years of experience in, and a deep understanding of, the thoroughbred horseracing industry. | |
| Andréa Carter | ||
|
Age: 56 Director since 2022 |
Background, Skills and Experience
Ms. Carter was appointed to the Board of Directors on December 15, 2022. She has amassed over 25 years of professional experience in the field of human resources across multiple industries and major organizations and is currently serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer for Allstate Corporation based in Chicago. Prior to joining Allstate in May 2025, Ms. Carter served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer for Global Payments, Inc. in Atlanta. Ms. Carter was Chief Human Resources Officer for Habitat for Humanity and has held various executive Human Resources roles at Ralph Lauren, Newell Rubbermaid, and The Home Depot. She holds a bachelor’s degree in interdisciplinary studies from Tennessee State University and is a graduate of the Executive Leadership Council Class of 2022. Ms. Carter has been recognized with a number of distinctions and awards in recent years, which include: Atlanta Business Chronicle, “Women who Mean Business,” Atlanta Magazine, “Women Making a Mark,” Savoy Magazine, “Power 300 Most Influential Black Executives,” Women’s Inc., “Most Influential Women Execs in Corporate America,” and is a 2021 recipient of the UNCF MASKED award (Mankind Assisting Students Kindle Educational Dreams).
Key Qualifications and Experience
Ms. Carter has extensive leadership and human resources experience across multiple public companies. | |
| (1) | Except as noted with respect to Ms. Carter, there has been no change in principal occupation or employment of any Class II director during the past 5 years. |
| (2) | Summaries above include directorships at any time within the last 5 years in companies with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, in the case of certain nominees, other present or former directorships or positions considered significant by them. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
11 |
Table of Contents
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE MATRIX
| Experience and Attributes | ||||||||||||||||
| Executive Leadership
|
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||
| Finance / Capital Markets
|
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||
| Mergers & Acquisitions / Business Development / Strategy
|
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||
| Human Capital / Talent Development / Compensation
|
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||
| Risk Management / Regulatory
|
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||
| Industry / Horseracing
|
● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||||
| Corporate Governance and Diversity
|
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||
The table below provides certain diversity information regarding our Board members.
| Background | ||||||||||||||||
| Age | 58 | 56 | 58 | 70 | 67 | 70 | 62 | |||||||||
| Gender Identity | ||||||||||||||||
| Male |
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||
| Female |
● | ● | ||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity | ||||||||||||||||
| Black / African American |
● | |||||||||||||||
| White |
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||
| 12 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
Retirement Age Policy
The Company has a mandatory retirement age policy in the Corporate Governance Guidelines with regard to directors, which provides that a person is not qualified to serve as a director unless he or she is less than seventy-five (75) years of age on the date of election. No director nominees in Class III will have met the mandatory retirement age as of the date of the Annual Meeting.
Director Compensation for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025
During 2025, each non-employee director of the Board of Directors received the compensation set forth below (all fees shown are annual fees). After considering market data and the input of the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the Company increased the Retainer Fee from $75,000 to $105,000 and the Stock Award from $155,000 to $205,000 and eliminated the Meeting Fee that was provided to reimburse travel expenses for directors not residing in Louisville, Kentucky.
| Retainer Fee ($)(1) |
Stock Awards ($)(2) |
Chairman Fee ($) |
Non-Chairman Fee ($) |
|||||||||||||
| Board of Directors |
105,000 | 205,000 | 155,000 | (3) | ||||||||||||
| Compensation Committee |
25,000 | 12,500 | ||||||||||||||
| Nominating and Governance Committee |
20,000 | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Audit Committee |
35,000 | 15,000 | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Retainer fee is paid in arrears, in equal quarterly installments. |
| (2) | Each non-employee director received a grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), with an aggregate grant date fair value of $205,000. Each non-employee director may elect to receive all or a portion of such grant as restricted stock (“RSAs”), which are legally issued common stock at the time of grant, with certain restrictions placed on them. |
| (3) | Represents an additional fee for serving as non-employee Chairman of the Board of Directors. |
In accordance with the fees described above, in 2025, we provided the following compensation to our non-employee directors. Occasionally, a spouse or other guest may accompany a non-employee director on corporate aircraft when the aircraft is already scheduled for business purposes and can accommodate additional passengers. In those cases, there is no aggregate incremental cost to the Company and, as a result, no amount is reflected in the compensation table below. Mr. Carstanjen, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), is not separately compensated for his service on our Board. Please see the 2025 Summary Compensation Table on page 42 for a summary of the compensation paid to our CEO with respect to 2025.
| Name | Fees earned or paid in cash ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(3) |
Total ($) | |||||||||
| Ulysses L. Bridgeman, Jr.(1) |
28,750 | 0 | 28,750 | |||||||||
| Andréa Carter |
127,500 | (2) | 205,000 | 332,500 | ||||||||
| Douglas C. Grissom |
137,500 | (2) | 205,000 | 342,500 | ||||||||
| Daniel P. Harrington |
145,000 | (2) | 205,000 | 350,000 | ||||||||
| Karole F. Lloyd |
150,000 | 205,000 | 355,000 | |||||||||
| R. Alex Rankin |
260,000 | 205,000 | 465,000 | |||||||||
| Paul C. Varga |
132,500 | 205,000 | 337,500 | |||||||||
| (1) | Mr. Bridgeman served on the Board until his death on March 11, 2025. |
| (2) | The Churchill Downs Incorporated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan allows directors to defer receipt of all or part of their retainer and meeting fees in a deferred share account until after their service on the Board has ended. This account allows the director, in effect, to invest all or part of his or her deferred cash compensation in Company Common Stock. Funds in this account are credited as hypothetical shares of Common Stock based on the market price of the stock at the time the compensation would otherwise have been earned. Hypothetical dividends are reinvested |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
13 |
Table of Contents
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
| in additional shares based on the market price of the stock on the date dividends are paid. All shares in the deferred share accounts are hypothetical and are not issued or transferred until the director ends his or her service on the Board. Upon the end of Board service, the shares are issued or transferred to the director. Payout options under the plan are limited to either a single lump sum payment or equal annual installments over a term not to exceed ten years. In 2025, Mr. Grissom deferred all of his 2025 directors’ fees into a deferred share account under the plan, while Mr. Bridgeman deferred 50% of his 2025 directors’ fees into a deferred share account under the plan. As of December 31, 2025, Ms. Carter had 866 deferred shares, Mr. Grissom had 12,176 deferred shares, and Mr. Harrington had 71,790 deferred shares. |
| (3) | On April 24, 2025, each then-serving non-employee director received a grant of RSUs or RSAs, valued in the amount of $205,000, calculated based upon the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant. The RSUs or RSAs vest one year from the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service through the vesting date. If RSUs are awarded, at the time a director ceases being a director of the Company, the Company will issue one share of Common Stock for each vested RSU held by such director. As of December 31, 2025, Mr. Bridgeman had 0 RSUs and 0 RSAs, Ms. Carter had 3,558 RSUs, Mr. Grissom had 18,000 RSUs, Mr. Harrington had 51,562 RSUs, Ms. Lloyd had 13,182 RSUs and 2,330 RSAs, Mr. Rankin had 51,562 RSUs, and Mr. Varga had 10,201 RSUs. |
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
As memorialized in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board expects all directors to display confidence in the Company by ownership and retention of a meaningful amount of Common Stock. Pursuant to the Company’s insider trading policy, all directors are subject to the Company’s anti-hedging policy, which prohibits hedging and monetization transactions with respect to Common Stock. In addition, each director is expected to own shares with a fair market value equal to five times the director’s annual retainer. Each director appointed or elected to the Board has five years from the date of appointment or election to the Board to meet this requirement. Each director’s continuing compliance with the ownership guidelines will be measured in the year he or she stands for re-election and will be considered as one of the criteria for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee.
The chart below shows each current director’s compliance with the ownership guidelines calculated as of December 31, 2025, other than with respect to Mr. Carstanjen, who is subject to maintaining holdings of Common Stock equal to at least six times his annual base salary, pursuant to the Key Executive Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines, as further described in the “Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines” section below. In addition, deferred shares acquired by directors under the Churchill Downs Incorporated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan and RSUs and RSAs granted as director compensation are included for purposes of measuring compliance with the Company’s share ownership guidelines.
| Director | Ownership Guidelines |
Met Guidelines | ||
| Andréa Carter |
5x | Transition Period(1) | ||
| Douglas C. Grissom |
5x | ✓ | ||
| Daniel P. Harrington |
5x | ✓ | ||
| Karole F. Lloyd |
5x | ✓ | ||
| R. Alex Rankin |
5x | ✓ | ||
| Paul C. Varga |
5x | ✓ | ||
| ✓ | = | Met guidelines. | ||
| (1) | Ms. Carter became a director in December 2022 and will not be required to satisfy the Director Stock Ownership Guidelines until December 2027. |
| 14 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The Board of Directors is responsible for providing effective governance over the Company’s affairs. The Company’s corporate governance practices are designed to align the interests of the Board and management with those of our shareholders and to promote honesty and integrity throughout the Company.
We annually review our corporate governance policies and practices and compare them to those suggested by various authorities in corporate governance and the practices of other public companies, as well as any updated SEC and Nasdaq rules.
Copies of the current charter, as approved by our Board, for each of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees, as well as copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct (along with any amendments or waivers related to the Code of Conduct), are available on our corporate website, http://www.churchilldownsincorporated.com, under the “Governance” subheading under the “Investors” tab. Please note that information available through our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
The Company has adopted an insider trading policy governing the purchase and sale and other disposition of Company securities by our directors, officers and employees. The Company believes this policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and Nasdaq listing standards. It is also our policy that the Company will not trade in company securities in violation of applicable securities laws or stock exchange listing standards. Our insider trading policy was filed as Exhibit 19 to our Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
Shareholder Communications
Shareholders and other interested parties may send communications to the Company’s Board of Directors addressed to the Board of Directors or to any individual director c/o Churchill Downs Incorporated, 600 N. Hurstbourne Parkway, Ste. 400, Louisville, Kentucky 40222. Any correspondence addressed to the Board of Directors in care of the Company is forwarded to the Board of Directors without review by management.
Board Leadership Structure
R. Alex Rankin is the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Board continues to deem it advisable to maintain certain aspects of its governance structure to assure effective independent oversight. These governance practices include maintaining executive sessions of the independent directors after each Board meeting, annual performance evaluations of the CEO by the independent directors, and separate roles for the CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines state that the offices of the Chairman of the Board and CEO may be either combined or separated, in the Board’s discretion; provided, that if the Board designates one individual to serve as the Chairman of the Board and the CEO, the Board will then designate an independent director to serve as the Lead Independent Director. The Board will review the designation of Lead Independent Director periodically, but in no event less often than every two years. The Board is currently led by an independent Chairman, Mr. Rankin. The Board believes that separating the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board is the most appropriate structure at this time. Separating the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board ensures that our CEO is able to more exclusively focus on this role. The Board also believes that an independent Chairman of the Board allows for independent oversight of management, increases management accountability, and encourages an objective evaluation of management’s performance relative to compensation.
The Chairman of the Board has the following responsibilities (in conjunction with the Lead Independent Director, if applicable): (i) preside at all Board meetings and meetings of shareholders, (ii) serve as liaison between the Board and Company management; (iii) work with the CEO to formulate the Company’s business strategies; and (iv) represent the Company, Board and management to the shareholders and the public. Additionally, the Chairman of the Board serves as an ex officio member of each Board committee on which the Chairman does not already serve as a voting member. The duties of the Lead Independent Director, if applicable, are set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Oversight of Company Risk
As part of its responsibility to oversee the management, business and strategy of the Company, the Board of Directors has overall responsibility for risk oversight. While the Board of Directors performs certain risk oversight functions directly, such as its ongoing review, approval and monitoring of the Company’s fundamental business and financial strategies and major corporate actions, the majority of the Board of Directors’ risk oversight functions are carried out through the operation of
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
15 |
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance
its committees. Each committee oversees risk management within its assigned areas of responsibility, as described below in the discussion of committee responsibilities. Enterprise risk management falls under the leadership of our executive team with oversight from the Audit Committee. The purpose of this program is to promote risk-intelligent decision making and, in turn, increase the likelihood of achieving our operational objectives. Our Board of Directors is regularly advised of potential organizational risks and supporting mitigating policies, including quarterly reports from management on cybersecurity matters. For further details on cybersecurity oversight, please see Item 1C. Cybersecurity in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk assessment and risk management practices, as well as its compliance programs. The Audit Committee is also responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of the Company’s information technology security and control, which includes insurance coverage for protection against cyber-attacks. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include oversight of the risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies and practices, as well as its managerial development and succession plans. The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the risks related to the Company’s corporate governance structure and processes, including risks related to environmental and sustainability matters.
Board Evaluations
The Board conducts an annual self-evaluation to assist in determining whether it and its committees are functioning effectively. The Nominating and Governance Committee solicits comments from all directors and reports annually to the Board with an assessment of the Board’s performance and how its committees are functioning. This is discussed with the full Board following the end of each fiscal year. The assessment focuses on the Board’s contribution to the Company and specifically focuses on areas in which the Board or management believes that the Board could improve.
Board Meetings and Committees
Seven (7) meetings of the Board of Directors were held during the last fiscal year. During the fiscal year, all incumbent directors attended at least 75% of their Board and committee meetings for the period for which they served. The Company encourages its directors to attend the annual meeting of shareholders each year. Each of the directors on the Board attended the Company’s annual meeting in 2025.
The Board has determined that all of the directors of the Company who served during any part of the last completed fiscal year are “independent directors,” as defined under Nasdaq Rule 5605(a)(2), except William C. Carstanjen, due to his position as CEO of the Company.
As required by the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board of Directors currently has four (4) standing committees: the Executive, Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees. The current composition of the committees is illustrated in the table below, along with the number of meetings held in 2025.
| Director Name |
Board of Directors |
Executive Committee |
Audit Committee |
Compensation Committee |
Nominating and Governance Committee | |||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
Member |
|||||||||
| Douglas C. Grissom |
Member |
Member |
Chair | |||||||
| Daniel P. Harrington |
Member |
Member |
Member |
Chair |
||||||
| Karole F. Lloyd |
Member |
Chair |
Member | |||||||
| R. Alex Rankin |
Chair |
Chair |
||||||||
| Paul C. Varga |
Member |
Member |
Member |
|||||||
| Andréa Carter |
Member |
Member |
Member | |||||||
| Number of meetings in 2025 |
7 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 | |||||
| = | Ex-officio Member | |||
| 16 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The Executive Committee is authorized, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, to exercise the authority of the Board of Directors between Board meetings. The Executive Committee does not meet on a regular basis, but instead meets as and when needed.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The primary purposes of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility in monitoring management’s conduct of the Company’s financial reporting process and overseeing the Company’s risk assessment and risk management practices. The Audit Committee is generally responsible for monitoring the integrity of the financial reporting process, systems of internal controls and financial statements and other financial reports provided by the Company to any governmental or regulatory body, the public or other users thereof, as well as overseeing the processes by which management assesses the Company’s exposure to cybersecurity and other risks and evaluating the guidelines and policies governing the Company’s monitoring, control and minimization of such exposures.
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities are as follows, among others:
| ● | To monitor the performance of the Company’s internal audit function. |
| ● | To appoint, remove, compensate, retain and oversee the independent registered public accounting firm engaged by the Company for the purpose of preparing or issuing audit opinions on the Company’s financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting. |
| ● | To monitor the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as well as the Company’s Code of Conduct and compliance policies. |
| ● | To consider the effectiveness of the company’s internal control system including information technology security and control. |
| ● | To inquire of management, including its internal auditor, and the Company’s independent auditors regarding significant risks or exposures, including those related to fraudulent activities, facing the Company; to assess the steps management has taken or proposes to take to minimize such risks to the Company; and to periodically review compliance with such steps. |
| ● | In discharging its oversight role, to investigate any matter brought to its attention with full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company and to retain outside counsel, auditors or other experts for this purpose. |
| ● | To assist the Board in overseeing the Company’s enterprise risk management process, including reviewing risks relating to cybersecurity as well as major legislative and regulatory developments that could materially impact the Company’s risk. |
| ● | To conduct an annual performance evaluation of the Audit Committee. |
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors operates under a written charter which is reviewed annually and the Company’s Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Company’s Audit Committee are independent as defined under Nasdaq Rule 5605(a)(2) and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act.
The Board of Directors has determined that Daniel P. Harrington and Karole F. Lloyd are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by regulations promulgated by the SEC.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Responsibilities of the Compensation Committee
The Board established the Compensation Committee to assist it in discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the CEO, each of the Company’s other executive officers, and the Company’s non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for decisions relating to all compensation plans, policies and perquisites as they affect the CEO and other executive officers and may form and delegate authority to subcommittees when it deems appropriate.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
17 |
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance
The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities are as follows, among others:
| ● | To oversee the development and implementation of the Company’s compensation policies and programs for executive officers, including the CEO. |
| ● | To establish the annual goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO and the executive officers and to present such to the Board annually. |
| ● | To evaluate the performance of the CEO and other executive officers in light of the agreed-upon goals and objectives and to determine and approve the compensation level of the CEO, including the balance of the components of total compensation, based on such evaluation and to present its report to the Board annually. |
| ● | To develop guidelines for the compensation and performance of the Company’s executive officers and to determine and approve the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, including the balance of the components of total compensation. |
| ● | To establish appropriate performance targets, participation and levels of awards with respect to the Company’s incentive compensation plans. |
| ● | To administer the Company’s equity-based compensation plans, including the establishment of criteria for the granting of stock-based awards and the review and approval of such grants in accordance with the criteria. |
| ● | To review and approve hiring, retention and termination agreements and/or deferred compensation arrangements with the Company’s executive officers. |
| ● | To establish and periodically review Company policies relating to senior management perquisites and other non-cash benefits. |
| ● | To review periodically the operation of the Company’s overall compensation program for key employees and evaluate its effectiveness in promoting shareholder value and Company objectives. |
| ● | To review the results of any advisory shareholder votes on executive compensation and consider whether to recommend adjustments to the Company’s compensation policies and programs as a result of such results. |
| ● | To consider, at least annually, whether risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and practices for all employees, including non-executive officers, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company, including whether the Company’s incentive compensation arrangements encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking. |
| ● | To approve any compensation “clawback” policy required by law or otherwise adopted by the Company. |
| ● | To oversee regulatory compliance with respect to matters relating to executive officer compensation. |
| ● | To approve plans for managerial development and succession within the Company and to present such plans to the Board annually. |
| ● | To periodically review the Company’s key human capital management strategies, policies, programs and practices, including those relating to diversity, equity and inclusion, employee engagement and talent recruitment, development and retention. |
| ● | To review, assess and recommend to the Board appropriate compensation for non-employee directors. |
| ● | To oversee the production of and approve the report on executive compensation to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders. |
| ● | To review and discuss with management the compensation discussion and analysis, and based on such discussion, make a recommendation to the Board as to whether or not the compensation discussion and analysis should be included in the proxy statement. |
| ● | To review and reassess the adequacy of its charter annually and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval. |
| ● | To conduct an annual performance evaluation of the Compensation Committee. |
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors operates under a written charter which is reviewed annually and is comprised entirely of directors meeting the independence requirements of Nasdaq and Rule 10C-1(b)(1) under the Exchange Act.
| 18 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the directors who served on the Compensation Committee at any time during the last fiscal year were officers or employees of the Company or were former officers of the Company. None of the members who served on the Compensation Committee at any time during fiscal 2025 had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Finally, no executive officer of the Company serves, or in the past fiscal year has served, as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee.
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee performed an assessment of whether risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and practices for all employees during 2025, including non-executive officers, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Each policy and plan was evaluated based on certain elements of risk, including, but not limited to, (i) the mix of fixed and variable pay, (ii) types of performance metrics, (iii) performance goals and payout curves, (iv) payment timing and adjustments, (v) equity incentives, and (vi) stock ownership requirements and trading policies. Based on this evaluation, an assessment of each plan was performed, along with an overall assessment of compensation risk to the Company. After evaluation and discussion, the Committee determined that the Company’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
The Company’s Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, evaluating, and recommending individuals qualified to become members of the Board, overseeing annual performance of the Board and Committees, and establishing the criteria for and reviewing the effectiveness of the Company’s Board of Directors. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee provides oversight regarding the Company’s environmental, sustainability and governance efforts and progress and corporate governance policies.
The Company’s Nominating and Governance Committee operates under a written charter and is comprised entirely of directors meeting the independence requirements of Nasdaq.
Pursuant to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Governance Committee determines and recommends to the Board criteria regarding personal qualifications needed for Board membership, and the Committee considers, reviews qualifications, and recommends qualified candidates for Board membership. In doing so, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the composition of the Board and the Company’s strategic plans to determine its needs regarding Board composition and identify candidates with the appropriate skill sets and qualifications. While the Company does not have a formal policy on diversity for members of the Board of Directors, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines specifically provide that diversity of race and gender, as well as general diversity of backgrounds and experience represented on the Board of Directors are factors to consider in evaluating potential directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to include diverse individuals with respect to self-identified characteristics such as gender, race, and ethnicity when conducting a search for qualified candidates for Board membership. The Nominating and Governance Committee may employ an outside consultant to identify nominees with the skill sets, experience and backgrounds that suit the Company’s needs.
A candidate for the Company’s Board of Directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the Company’s various constituencies. In considering a candidate for nomination as a member of the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider criteria such as independence; occupational background, including principal occupation (i.e., chief executive officer, attorney, accountant, investment banker, or other pertinent occupation); level and type of business experience (i.e., financial, lending, investment, media, racing industry, technology, etc.); self-identified diversity characteristics; number of boards on which the individual serves; and the general diversity of backgrounds and experience represented on the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee periodically reviews the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and, when appropriate, recommends changes to the Board. It also evaluates the performance of the Board and provides feedback to the Board on how the directors, the committees and the Board are functioning. Finally, it evaluates Board of Director practices at the Company and leadership on an annual basis and recommends appropriate changes to the Board and/or its practices.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
19 |
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance
The Nominating and Governance Committee receives and considers issues raised by shareholders or other stakeholders in the Company and recommends appropriate responses to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider recommendations for director candidates submitted by shareholders. Such questions, comments or recommendations should be submitted in writing to the Nominating and Governance Committee in care of the Office of the Secretary at 600 N. Hurstbourne Parkway, Ste. 400, Louisville, Kentucky 40222. The Nominating and Governance Committee, in having adopted criteria to be considered for membership on its Board, considers such candidates applying such criteria and follows the recommendation process noted above. Recommendations by shareholders that are made in accordance with these procedures will receive the same consideration as recommendations from other sources.
| 20 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2026 (Proposal No. 2)
| PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2026 (Proposal No. 2)
|
The Board of Directors, on recommendation from the Audit Committee, selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. PwC has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since the Company’s 1990 fiscal year.
Although the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws do not require that the Company’s shareholders ratify the appointment of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Board of Directors is submitting the appointment of PwC to the Company’s shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. This proposal will be approved if the votes cast favoring the action exceed the votes cast opposing the action. If the appointment is not ratified, the Company’s Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Company’s Audit Committee, in its sole discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.
| The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee recommend that the shareholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal year 2026. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
21 |
Table of Contents
Independent Public Accountants
| INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
|
Audit Fees
The audit fees incurred by the Company for services provided by PwC (i) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, were $3,708,000 and (ii) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, were $3,159,500. Audit fees include services related to the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, involvement with registration statement filings, statutory audits and consultations related to miscellaneous SEC and financial reporting matters.
Audit-Related Fees
The Company incurred fees in the amount of $1,790,000 for 2025 and $4,600 for 2024 for assurance and related services performed by PwC that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements that are not reported in the preceding section.
Tax Fees
The Company did not incur any tax fees for services provided by PwC in 2025 or 2024. Tax fees include services related to tax return preparation for a related entity, tax consultation and tax advice.
All Other Fees
All other fees incurred by the Company for services provided by PwC relate to the use of Inform, PwC’s accounting research software, and PwC’s disclosure checklist software, which amounted to $2,000 in each of 2025 and 2024. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services to the Company is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence.
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy of evaluating and pre-approving all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to a member, provided that decisions of such member shall be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors in 2025.
| 22 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Churchill Downs Incorporated Audit Committee Report
| CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
|
The following is the report of the Company’s Audit Committee (the “Committee”), each member of which has been determined by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) to meet the current standards of the SEC and the Nasdaq exchange to be considered an “independent director.” The Board has also determined that two members, Daniel P. Harrington and Karole F. Lloyd, are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC.
The Committee has an Audit Committee Charter (the “Charter”). The Charter sets forth certain responsibilities of the Committee, which include oversight of the integrity of the financial reporting process and financial statements of the Company, the systems of internal controls over financial reporting which management has established, the independence and performance of the Company’s internal and independent auditors, the Company’s compliance with financial, accounting, legal and regulatory requirements, and the effectiveness of the Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) function. The Committee reviews the work of the Company’s management, the internal audit staff and the independent auditors on behalf of the Board.
Specifically, the Committee:
| • | Met four (4) times during the year, during which the Committee reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditors the Company’s interim and annual financial statements for 2025; at each of such meetings, the Committee met in executive session with the Company’s Vice President of Internal Audit, independent auditors, General Counsel, CFO, and CEO. |
| • | Discussed with the independent auditors all matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC. |
| • | Received the written disclosures and letters from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with the independent auditors the independent auditors’ independence. |
| • | Based on the review and discussions referred to in the first three bullets above, the Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. |
| • | Reviewed and discussed reports from the Company’s internal audit department and reports from the Company’s legal and compliance department. |
| • | Discussed with management and the independent auditors the quality of the Company’s internal controls. |
| • | Review the Company’s significant financial, business, and other risk exposures and the steps management has taken to prevent, detect, and monitor such exposures as part of the ERM function. |
| • | Reviewed and approved all related person transactions, if any. |
| • | Self-evaluated the effectiveness of the Committee. |
| • | Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit function. |
| • | Inquired of management, including its internal auditor, and the Company’s independent auditors regarding significant risks or exposures, including those related to fraudulent activities, facing the Company; assessed the steps management has taken or proposes to take to minimize such risks to the Company; and reviewed compliance with such steps. |
| • | Reviewed and approved the 2025 audit and non-audit services and related fees provided by the independent auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”). The non-audit services approved by the Audit Committee were also reviewed to ensure compatibility with maintaining the auditor’s independence. |
| • | In February 2025, the Committee selected PwC to be reappointed as independent auditors for the calendar year 2025. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
23 |
Table of Contents
Churchill Downs Incorporated Audit Committee Report
No portion of this Audit Committee Report shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), through any general statement incorporating by reference in its entirety the Proxy Statement in which this report appears, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this report or a portion of it by reference. In addition, this report shall not be deemed to be filed under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
Members of the Audit Committee
Karole F. Lloyd, Chair
Daniel P. Harrington
Paul C. Varga
R. Alex Rankin, ex officio
| 24 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Proposal No. 3)
| ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (Proposal No. 3)
|
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company’s shareholders are entitled to a vote to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (“NEOs”) as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules. In accordance with the preference expressed by shareholders, the Company is holding such advisory votes on an annual basis and the next advisory vote following the Annual Meeting will occur at the 2027 annual meeting of shareholders.
The Company has a “pay-for-performance” philosophy that forms the foundation of all decisions regarding compensation of the Company’s NEOs. We believe that this compensation philosophy, and the program structure approved by the Compensation Committee, is central to the Company’s ability to attract, motivate and retain individuals who can achieve superior financial results while also aligning the interests of the executives with the interests of shareholders over the long-term. This approach has resulted in the Company’s ability to attract and retain the executive talent deemed necessary to guide the Company successfully during a period of growth and transformation and react quickly to potential threats to the Company’s financial health. Please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Summary” for an overview of the compensation of the Company’s NEOs.
This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to approve the compensation of the Company’s NEOs by voting FOR the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure in this Proxy Statement.”
This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company. The Board of Directors and Compensation Committee value the opinions of the Company’s shareholders. Should there be a significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the Board will consider those shareholders’ concerns and will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
This proposal will be approved if the votes cast favoring the action exceed the votes cast opposing the action.
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the advisory resolution relating to the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
25 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (our “CD&A”) provides an overview of our executive compensation program for 2025 and our executive compensation philosophies and objectives.
| Table of Contents |
| |||
| 27 | ||||
| 27 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 32 | ||||
| 33 | ||||
| 33 | ||||
| 34 | ||||
| 36 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
| 40 | ||||
| 40 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
Our NEOs were:
| William C. Carstanjen Chief Executive Officer |
William E. Mudd President and Chief Operating Officer |
Marcia A. Dall Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Bradley K. Blackwell Executive Vice President and General Counsel |
Maureen Adams(1) Former Executive Vice President, Gaming Operations |
| (1) | Maureen Adams retired from the Company effective December 31, 2025. |
| 26 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
The Company has been creating extraordinary entertainment experiences for over 150 years, beginning with the Company’s most iconic and enduring asset, the Kentucky Derby. Headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, the Company has expanded through the acquisition, development, and operation of live and historical racing entertainment venues, the growth of the online wagering businesses, and the acquisition, development, and operation of regional casino gaming properties. Our long-term success depends on our ability to attract, engage, motivate and retain highly talented executives and key employees to achieve our strategic plans and deliver financial returns to shareholders over both the short-term and long-term. One of the key objectives of our executive compensation program is to link executives’ pay to their performance and their advancement of the Company’s long-term performance and business strategies. Other objectives include aligning the executives’ interests with those of shareholders and encouraging high-performing executives to remain with the Company over the course of their careers. We believe that the amount of compensation for each NEO reflects each individual’s extensive management experience, high performance and exceptional service to the Company and our shareholders. We also believe that the Company’s compensation strategies have been effective in attracting executive talent and promoting performance and retention.
This CD&A describes the Company’s executive compensation policies and programs and how these policies and programs apply to our NEOs. It also describes the actions and decisions of the Compensation Committee (or, in this CD&A and related tables, “Committee”), which oversees the executive compensation program and determines the compensation of the NEOs. A detailed discussion of the Committee’s structure, roles and responsibilities, and related matters can be found under “Compensation Committee” on pages 17-19.
Our long-term incentive goals are based on operational results that the Committee believes help drive Company and shareholder success over multi-year performance periods. Certain metrics the Company uses for incentive purposes are as follows (Please refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 for reconciliation of these metrics to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, and the discussion of the Company’s Executive Annual Incentive Plan (“EAIP”) beginning on page 34 and the Company’s Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan (“ELTI”) beginning on page 36):
| ● | Adjusted EBITDA—Adjusted EBITDA used for compensation purposes under the EAIP in fiscal year 2025 was $1,205.3 million, which is approximately 100.8% of the Adjusted EBITDA target of $1,195.5 million under the EAIP; |
| ● | Cash Flow Metric—Cash Flow Metric for compensation purposes for the three-year performance for our 2023 performance stock units (“PSUs”) under the ELTI was $1,903.8 million, which is approximately 117.4% of the Cash Flow Metric target of $1,621.0 million under the ELTI; and |
| ● | Total Shareholder Return—Total Shareholder Return from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2025, the three-year performance period for our 2023 PSUs under the Company’s ELTI, was 7%. |
2025 Highlights
In 2025, we delivered strong performance and made investments in the Kentucky Derby and new entertainment venues that we believe will provide long-term sustainable value creation for our shareholders.
| ● | Record net revenue was $2.9 billion, up $191.6 million or 7.0%; |
| ● | Net income was $383.0 million, down $43.8 million or 10.3%; |
| ● | Record adjusted EBITDA was $1.2 billion, up $46.1 million, or 4.0%; |
Live and Historical Racing Segment:
| ● | Adjusted EBITDA was $637.0 million, up $62.4 million or 10.9% from fiscal year 2024. |
| ● | Churchill Downs Racetrack: |
| — | Churchill Downs Racetrack ran the 151st Kentucky Derby on the first Saturday of May, generating all-time handle record for the Kentucky Derby Race, Kentucky Derby Day Program, and Kentucky Derby Week races with nearly 147,000 fans gathered in person to watch the most exciting two minutes in sports. |
| — | The Starting Gate Pavilion and Courtyard was completed for the 151st running of the Kentucky Derby. The renovations updated seating options and created a more upscale social environment with new concessions, bars, and wagering windows. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
27 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
| — | We announced NBC Sports will showcase the Kentucky Oaks in prime time for the first time ever in 2026. |
| — | We are investing up to $30.0 million to renovate the existing Finish Line Suites and The Mansion for the 152nd Kentucky Derby in May 2026. |
| — | We are investing $280.0 to $300.0 million to build a new building on the first turn of the Churchill Downs Racetrack between the First Turn Club and the Skye Terrace. The Company anticipates construction of this new building will begin following the 2026 Kentucky Derby and will be completed by the 2028 Kentucky Derby. |
| ● | Kentucky: |
| — | Western Kentucky: Opened Owensboro Racing & Gaming in Owensboro, Kentucky in February 2025 with 600 HRMs, food and beverage offerings, a retail sportsbook, and a simulcast wagering area. |
| — | Southwestern Kentucky: Held the grand opening for Marshall Yards Racing & Gaming on February 25, 2026 in Calvert City, Kentucky. The new HRM entertainment venue has 225 HRMs, a sports bar, a retail sportsbook, and a simulcast wagering area. |
| ● | Virginia: |
| — | Northern Virginia: Continued to grow The Rose Gaming Resort (“The Rose”) in Dumfries, Virginia during its first full year of operation. The Rose has 1,610 HRMs, a 102-room hotel, food and beverage offerings, a simulcast wagering area, and event space. |
| — | Central Virginia: |
| — | Completed the expansion of the Richmond, Virginia HRM in August 2025. |
| — | Opened Roseshire Gaming Parlor in Henrico County in September 2025 with 175 HRMs, food and beverage offerings, and a simulcast wagering area. |
| ● | New Hampshire: |
| — | Acquired 90% of the outstanding equity interests related to Casino Salem in Salem, New Hampshire in August 2025. The Company announced in January 2026 that Casino Salem will be redeveloped as Rockingham Grand Casino (“Rockingham”). Rockingham will occupy a 160,000 square-foot facility at Rockingham Mall. The venue will feature 825 historical racing machines, 32 table games, 12 electronic table game seats, a 900-seat live entertainment venue, and several food and beverage concepts, including a center bar and full-service sports bar and restaurant. The Company plans to open Rockingham in mid-2027 with an expected capital investment of $180.0 to $200.0 million. |
Wagering Services and Solutions Segment:
| ● | Adjusted EBITDA was $177.3 million, up $11.7 million or 7.1% from fiscal year 2024. |
| ● | We expanded Exacta technology and product offerings to customers in new states. |
Gaming Segment:
| ● | Adjusted EBITDA was $483.0 million, down $23.9 million or 4.7% from fiscal year 2024. |
| ● | Terre Haute Casino Resort (“Terre Haute”): Continued to grow the Terre Haute Casino Resort during its first full year of operation. Terre Haute has over 1,000 slot machines, table games, a 400,000 square-foot entertainment venue, food and beverage offerings, and a retail sportsbook. |
All Other:
| ● | We repurchased $425.3 million of shares under our share repurchase program in 2025, based on trade date. |
| ● | We continued in our ESG efforts with the ongoing promotion of responsible gaming; initiatives at our properties to lessen energy and water usage, to decrease carbon emissions, and to responsibly manage waste; increasing investments in the communities in which we operate and supporting our teams through educational and leadership development; and increasing engagement with our shareholders. |
We remain committed to delivering strong financial results and long-term sustainable growth. Our businesses generate strong cash flow, and we have a solid balance sheet that supports our organic growth as well as strategic acquisitions that we believe will create long-term value for our shareholders.
| 28 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Key 2025 Compensation Actions
| ● | The primary elements of our total direct compensation program for the NEOs and a summary of the actions taken by the Committee during 2025 are set forth below. |
| Compensation Component |
Link to Business and Talent Strategies | 2025 Compensation Actions | ||
| Base Salary |
• Competitive base salaries help attract and retain executive talent. |
• Market-based increases of 3% for Mr. Mudd, Ms. Dall, Mr. Blackwell, and Ms. Adams, with Mr. Carstanjen’s base salary remaining the same as compared to 2024. | ||
| Annual Cash |
• Focus executives on achieving annual financial and non-financial results that are considered key indicators of financial and operational performance.
• Annual cash incentives are earned based on achievement of Adjusted EBITDA and other strategic, operational and financial measures. |
• The target opportunities for all NEOs remained the same as compared to 2024.
• Annual cash incentive awards were earned at 128% of target for Mr. Carstanjen, Mr. Mudd, Ms. Dall, and Mr. Blackwell and 103% of target for Ms. Adams due to strong Company and executive performance. | ||
| Long-Term Equity |
• 2025 annual equity-based awards consist of PSUs and RSUs.
• 2025 PSUs vest based on achievement of 3-year Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA and 3-year Cumulative Cash Flow metrics that are considered key indicators of long-term performance, with vesting adjusted based on relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance to additionally incorporate a measure of shareholder value creation over the performance period.
• RSUs provide focus on stock price growth and serve our talent retention objectives. |
• Merit and market-based increases to each NEO, except for Ms. Adams who did not receive a 2025 equity-based award.
• The target value of the equity award mix is generally balanced between PSUs (50%) and RSUs (50%).
• 2025 PSUs are subject to a multi-year performance period and will be earned based on goals relating to Adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%) and Cash Flow (weighted 50%) measured over the 2025-2027 performance period, with a relative TSR modifier of +/- 25% for TSR performance over the 2025-2027 performance period.
• RSUs vest over three years in equal annual installments. | ||
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
29 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Core Principles
|
|
What We Do |
|
|
|
What We Don’t Do |
| ||||||||||
| ✓ |
Generally Target Median Compensation Among Peer Group | × |
No Employment Agreements | |||||||||||||
| ✓ |
Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines | × |
No Re-pricing of SARs or Stock Options | |||||||||||||
| ✓ |
PSUs Vesting over Multi-year Performance Period | × |
No Excessive Perquisites | |||||||||||||
| ✓ |
Capped Bonus Payments under EAIP | × |
No Service Based Defined Benefit Pension Plans | |||||||||||||
| ✓ |
Capped PSU Vesting Levels | × |
No Excise Tax Gross Ups upon Change in Control | |||||||||||||
| ✓ |
Payouts Tied to Individual and Company Performance, with Majority of Payout Determined by Pre-Established Formula and Goal | |||||||||||||||
| ✓ |
Use of an Independent Compensation Consultant | |||||||||||||||
| ✓ |
Anti-Hedging Policy Applicable to Directors and Employees | |||||||||||||||
| ✓ |
Annual Say-on-Pay Vote | |||||||||||||||
The fundamental philosophy of the Committee is to provide an executive compensation program that links pay to business strategy and performance in a manner that is effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives while also aligning the interests of the executives with the interests of shareholders over the long-term. To that end, the Committee evaluates the pay practices of its peers and generally considers the median of the peer group. In order to continue to support the Company’s high-performance and entrepreneurial culture, the Company’s key principles underlying the executive compensation program are to:
| ● | Attract and retain executives with the skills and experience needed to successfully grow the Company and create value for shareholders; |
| ● | Create an entrepreneurial culture and mindset by de-emphasizing fixed pay (primarily salary) and focusing a significant percentage of compensation on at-risk pay elements (annual and long-term incentives); and |
| ● | Motivate and reward executives for achieving exceptional performance supportive of creating value for shareholders over the long-term. |
The Committee will continue to evaluate its pay practices and, when it deems appropriate, adjust its pay practices to support these principles over time.
2025 “Say-on-Pay” Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
The Committee monitors closely the results of the annual advisory “say-on-pay” vote and evaluates such results as one of the many factors considered in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities. In 2025, the Company provided shareholders a “say-on-pay” advisory vote on its executive compensation program, as disclosed in the Company’s 2025 proxy statement. At the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders, approximately 97% of the votes cast for the “say-on-pay” proposal were in favor of our executive compensation program. We believe that this result indicates significant shareholder support for our executive compensation program, and therefore made no changes to our executive compensation program as a result of this vote. At the Annual Meeting, we are again holding an advisory vote on executive compensation and will continue to engage with our shareholders as we constantly consider further improvements to our executive compensation program.
Role of Management and Independent Advisors
The Committee meetings are regularly attended by the CEO, the Senior Vice President of Human Resources, the Vice President of Human Resources, and the General Counsel. The Committee may request the participation of management or outside consultants as it deems necessary or appropriate. The Committee regularly reports to the Board on compensation matters and annually reviews the CEO’s compensation with the independent members of the Board.
The Committee also meets in executive session without any members of management for the purpose of discussing and approving compensation for the CEO, as well as other topics. The CEO reviews the performance of, and makes
| 30 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
recommendations to, the Committee regarding total compensation to be paid to the Company’s executive officers other than himself, including salary, annual bonus, and long-term incentive awards, as appropriate. Management also develops and presents to the Committee recommendations for the performance measures and targets to be used to evaluate annual performance incentives.
After the end of each fiscal year, the Committee conducts a review of the CEO’s performance. As part of this process, the CEO provides a written assessment of the Company’s performance. The Committee sets the compensation of the CEO in executive session after considering its assessment of the CEO’s performance, including due consideration of the CEO’s written assessment of the Company’s performance. Neither the CEO nor any other members of management are present during this session.
The Committee has sole discretion, at the Company’s expense, to retain and terminate independent advisors, including sole authority to approve the fees and retention terms for such advisors, if it shall determine the services of such advisors to be necessary or appropriate. Such advisors are engaged by, and report directly to, the Committee. Since March 2015, the Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent compensation consultant. The scope of the engagement of FW Cook includes:
| ● | Assisting the Chair of the Committee in establishing appropriate agendas for the Committee meetings; |
| ● | Reviewing management reports and recommendations to the Committee related to executive compensation matters; |
| ● | Attending Committee meetings and providing the Committee with input and advice based on the advisor’s broad experience with market practices, including a perspective regarding the competitive market; |
| ● | Assisting with the review of pay and performance and the evaluation of payouts under the Company’s annual and long-term incentive programs; |
| ● | Assisting with the review and evaluation of non-employee director compensation; |
| ● | Assisting the Committee in identifying similarly-situated peer group companies; |
| ● | Providing the Committee and management with data on market practices for executive pay; |
| ● | On behalf of the Committee, assisting management with disclosures, including this CD&A; |
| ● | Providing updates to the Committee regarding regulatory developments; and |
| ● | Assisting the Committee in evaluating future equity grants and cash compensation for the NEOs, including the CEO. |
FW Cook did not provide any services to the Company other than advising the Committee as provided above. The Committee assessed FW Cook’s independence considering the SEC requirements and Nasdaq listing standards, and the Company determined that FW Cook’s work did not raise any conflict of interest or independence concerns.
Factors Used to Evaluate Pay Decisions
The Company seeks to obtain and retain the services of executives who bring the skills, experience, and motivation deemed necessary to significantly expand the scope and scale of the Company’s operations. Therefore, compensation decisions for individual executives are made based on a balance of many subjective factors as evaluated by the CEO in the case of his direct reports (with Committee review and approval) and the Committee in the case of the CEO. These factors include:
| ● | The scope and responsibility of the executive’s position and the perceived level of contribution; |
| ● | Internal comparisons among the executive’s peers at the Company; |
| ● | Comparisons among the executive’s peers at the peer group companies, generally with a target of median among peers; |
| ● | The recruitment and development of talent in a competitive market; |
| ● | Target annual incentive opportunities based on the Company’s annual goals with regard to the executive’s position, as approved by the Committee; and |
| ● | Long-term incentive opportunities driven by the perceived level of contribution expected of the executive toward achieving the Company’s growth objectives. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
31 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Each element of compensation is evaluated independently based on the role of that component in achieving the Company’s overall compensation objectives, with an emphasis on long-term incentives and retention.
In making executive pay decisions, the Committee considers the advice and experience of FW Cook, its independent advisor, and the CEO to evaluate the reasonableness of executive pay. While the Committee considers input from its independent advisor and the CEO, all of the decisions with respect to the Company’s executive compensation programs are made by the Committee alone and may reflect factors and considerations other than the information and recommendations provided by management or its independent advisor. In addition, the CEO does not make recommendations with respect to his own compensation. The Committee determines pay levels and practices based on the talent needs of the organization as defined by our strategy of growing and diversifying revenues and with the guidance of the Committee’s independent advisor.
The Committee believes that it is important for the Company to provide a competitive compensation program and the Committee, with the assistance of the Committee’s independent advisor, conducts periodic reviews of compensation relative to similarly-situated businesses, which can lead to adjustments in compensation and program offerings. The compensation peer group was selected to represent a reasonable match to the Company in terms of size and business characteristics. The group consists of public, similarly sized gaming and entertainment companies, where the median net income and market capitalization approximate the Company’s net income and market capitalization. The Company periodically reviews the peer group and adjusts, as deemed necessary, for continued appropriateness as a market reference for informing executive compensation levels. The Company’s peer group for 2025 was as follows, which did not change as compared to the 2024 peer group:
| Fiscal 2025 Peer Group |
||||
| Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ALL) | ||||
| Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) | ||||
| Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) |
||||
| Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLTR) | ||||
| Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc. (GLPI) | ||||
| MGM Resorts International (MGM) | ||||
| PENN Entertainment, Inc., Inc. (PENN) | ||||
| Red Rock Resorts Inc. (RRR) | ||||
| Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) | ||||
| Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) |
Non-Disclosure of Certain Metrics and Targets
The Company believes in transparency and strives to disclose as much information to shareholders as possible except in situations where we believe that providing full, or even limited, disclosure would be detrimental to the interests of the Company and our shareholders. We believe certain disclosures could provide our competitors with insight regarding confidential business strategies without meaningfully adding to our shareholders’ understanding of the metric. Although we set compensation metrics and targets in advance of applicable performance periods, we do not disclose such metrics and targets in advance due to potential risk to the interests of the Company and our shareholders. We disclose such metrics and targets alongside actual performance in our annual filings following the completion of the applicable performance periods.
| 32 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Components of Compensation
During 2025, the Company used multiple components to provide an overall compensation and benefits package designed to attract and retain the needed level of executive talent for the Company and to incentivize their performance. The Committee believes that the goals that were set for the executives and executive compensation are aligned with the interests of our investors to support enhancing long-term shareholder value. The following table sets forth the principal compensation elements of the Company’s 2025 executive compensation program and how each element fits into the Company’s overall compensation program and is supportive of the Company’s executive compensation objectives.
| Motivation | ||||||||||
| Element of Compensation | Attraction | Short-Term | Long-Term | Alignment with Stockholder Interests |
Retention | |||||
| Base Salary |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Annual Incentive |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Long-Term Incentive |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
Base Salary
The Committee’s philosophy is that base salaries should meet the objectives of attracting and retaining the executive talent needed to grow the business and create shareholder value. Upon promotion or other adjustment of responsibilities, executives receive base pay increases that are intended to be commensurate with their new role or responsibilities, the pay levels for colleagues at similar levels in the organization and market pay practices, with increases thereafter based on an assessment of performance and the competitive market.
Peer group market analyses were performed for each of the NEO positions, generally targeting the median compensation levels among our peer group.
Based on the above considerations, the Committee set the following base salaries for the NEOs for 2025:
| Name | Position | 2024 Base Salary ($)(1) |
2025 Base Salary ($)(2) |
Percent Increase | ||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
Chief Executive Officer | 1,800,000 | 1,800,000 | 0% | ||||||||
| William E. Mudd |
President & COO | 1,236,000 | 1,273,080 | 3% | ||||||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
EVP & CFO | 919,275 | 950,000 | 3% | ||||||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
EVP & General Counsel | 750,000 | 775,000 | 3% | ||||||||
| Maureen Adams |
EVP, Gaming Operations | 643,750 | 663,062 | 3% | ||||||||
| (1) | Annual rate of base compensation shown as of December 31, 2024. |
| (2) | Annual rate of base compensation shown as of December 31, 2025. Actual salaries paid in 2025 are shown in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table on page 42. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
33 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Annual Incentive Plan
Our executive annual incentive plan is designed to motivate and reward our NEOs for achieving annual performance objectives by tying the majority of the EAIP award to attainment of a pre-established financial goal. We believe this program supports our “pay-for-performance” culture. 75% of the target EAIP award is determined formulaically based on corporate Adjusted EBITDA performance, and the remaining 25% is based on a qualitative assessment of the attainment of other financial, strategic, operational and individual goals established by the Committee.
The Committee utilized Adjusted EBITDA as elements in both the Company’s EAIP and ELTI in recognition that Adjusted EBITDA is viewed as a core driver of the Company’s performance and shareholder value creation. In designing the Company’s executive compensation program, the Committee supplemented this measure with additional performance measures in order to strike an appropriate balance with respect to incentivizing top-line growth, profitability, non-financial business imperatives and shareholder returns over both the short-term and long-term horizons.
Financial Component (75%)
As noted above, 75% of the target EAIP payout was determined formulaically based on achievement of the annual Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025) target (the “Financial Component”). In February 2025, the Committee set an Adjusted EBITDA target of $1,195.5 million, which was set higher than the actual 2024 Adjusted EBITDA performance of $1,159.2 million. The Compensation Committee believed at the time that the performance targets were rigorous yet achievable, and therefore established the targets so that the targets would be achieved, at the target performance level, if the Company successfully executed against its operating plan for 2025. Consistent with the 2024 EAIP design, potential EAIP payouts for the Financial Component ranged from 0% to 200% (i.e., 0% to 150% of total target EAIP award) based on the achievement of the pre-established financial goal in accordance with the following table:
| Percentage of Adjusted EBITDA Goal Achieved* |
Percentage of Financial Component Awarded |
Percentage of Total Target EAIP Award Awarded | ||
| Below 80% |
0% |
0% | ||
| 80% |
50% |
37.5% | ||
| 100% |
100% |
75% | ||
| 110% |
150% |
112.5% | ||
| 120% |
200% |
150% | ||
| * | Amounts in between based on interpolation between the points |
In 2025, the actual Company performance was $1,205.3 million in Adjusted EBITDA, which was 100.8% of the target of $1,195.5 million. This performance resulted in a payout for each NEO at 104.1% of target for the Financial Component (i.e., 78% of the target EAIP award) as detailed below.
| 2025 Adjusted EBITDA Target (in millions) |
2025 Actual Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) |
Actual Performance as a percentage of Adjusted EBITDA Target |
Percentage of Financial Component |
Percentage of Total Target EAIP Award | ||||
| $1,195.5 | $1,205.3 | 100.8% | 104.1% | 78% | ||||
| 34 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Qualitative Component (25%)
Pursuant to the EAIP, the Committee established secondary performance goals for the Company and its executives to be used to determine the vesting of the qualitative component under the EAIP, weighted 25% (the “Qualitative Component”).
The Committee set performance goals for 2025, based upon a comprehensive assessment of the Company against its long-term strategic plan and its ability to achieve said goals with its current leadership team and key employees.
Individual performance by the NEOs (as measured by various factors, including, but not limited to, continued growth and diversification of the Company’s asset portfolio, customer and employee satisfaction, and the completion of certain specified legislative and regulatory outcomes), and business unit performance led by the Company’s key employees (as measured by, among other things, revenue performance) was also considered in evaluating the Company’s performance, and determining the level of compensation deemed necessary to incent and reward the NEOs and key employees to continue to drive growth. These goals relate to the Company’s overall financial goals, strategic goals, and business segment goals, respectively, with no specific weighting attributed to any one goal.
In evaluating 2025 performance, a few of the accomplishments that were considered to be significantly above target by the Committee included:
| ● | The acquisition of Casino Salem, a charitable gaming facility located in Salem, New Hampshire, in August 2025. |
| ● | The completion and opening of Owensboro Racing and Gaming, a new HRM facility located in Owensboro, Kentucky, in February 2025. |
| ● | The completion of the Starting Gate Pavilion and Courtyard project at Churchill Downs Racetrack prior to the 151st Kentucky Derby in May 2025. |
| ● | The ongoing capital management execution enabling the Company to fund capital projects, grow dividends, and buy back shares while maintaining one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry. |
| ● | The strengthening of relationships with investors and analysts that has increased shareholder engagement and created substantial support for long-term shareholder value creation. |
| ● | The ongoing strengthening of the Company’s leadership team and development of team members with varied backgrounds across the Company to support long-term sustainable business growth. |
In determining the EAIP payouts for the Qualitative Component, the Compensation Committee exercises its discretion to determine whether to payout at, above, or below the target opportunities based upon its review of the outcomes evaluated against Company and individual performance. The individual Qualitative Component awards for Mr. Carstanjen, Mr. Mudd, Ms. Dall, and Mr. Blackwell were equal to 200% of target (50% of total target EAIP award) and for Ms. Adams was equal to 100% of target (25% of total target EAIP award), in each case made pursuant to the EAIP in recognition of the NEOs’ respective roles in driving performance during the period ending December 31, 2025.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
35 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Summary of 2025 EAIP Awards
As noted above, the Company exhibited strong overall financial performance in 2025 and the NEOs were viewed by the Committee to be the primary parties responsible for the actual performance relative to the performance goals established with respect to 2025. The Committee, after considering the Company’s overall performance, awarded Mr. Carstanjen, Mr. Mudd, Ms. Dall, and Mr. Blackwell the total EAIP awards equal to 128% of target and Ms. Adams the total EAIP award equal to 103% of target, in each case as shown in the table below and in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table in the column labeled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”
| Name | Target Incentive Award as a Percentage of Salary(1) |
Target Incentive Award in ($) |
Maximum Salary |
Maximum Incentive Award in ($) |
Actual 2025 Incentive Award in ($) |
|||||||||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
|
250 |
% |
|
4,500,000 |
|
|
500 |
% |
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
5,763,331 |
| |||||
| William E. Mudd |
|
125 |
% |
|
1,591,350 |
|
|
250 |
% |
|
3,182,700 |
|
|
2,038,106 |
| |||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
|
110 |
% |
|
1,045,000 |
|
|
220 |
% |
|
2,090,000 |
|
|
1,338,374 |
| |||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
|
100 |
% |
|
775,000 |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
1,550,000 |
|
|
992,574 |
| |||||
| Maureen Adams |
|
90 |
% |
|
596,756 |
|
|
180 |
% |
|
1,193,512 |
|
|
615,101 |
| |||||
Long-Term Incentives
The objective of the Company’s long-term incentive compensation program is to support the entrepreneurial mindset desired of management by the Board of Directors by providing an opportunity to earn significant equity in the Company for achieving significant performance improvements.
The Company maintains the ELTI, pursuant to which the NEOs may earn variable equity payouts based upon the Company achieving certain key performance metrics. While the purpose of the ELTI is to provide participants with a long-term incentive program that is designed to be market-competitive and provides long-term incentives on a regular, predictable, and annual basis, participation each year is at the discretion of the Committee. Eligible participants (as determined by the Committee) may be members of the Company’s senior executive team and/or such other executives and key contributors as the Committee may designate from time to time. As and to the extent determined by the Committee as part of the annual compensation planning process for participants, the CEO will participate in the ELTI at a rate determined by the Committee. No individual will have an automatic right to participate in the ELTI. Factors considered when making grants include the compensation practices within the peer group, potential succession planning considerations, the retentive element of the existing ELTI awards held by the potential participant and Company and individual performance.
The Committee and senior management monitor the Company’s equity grant practices to evaluate whether such policies comply with governing regulations and are consistent with good corporate practices. When making regular annual equity grants, the Committee’s practice is to approve them at its meeting in February of each year as part of the annual compensation review and after results for the preceding fiscal year become available. Because the Committee’s regular meeting schedule is determined in the prior fiscal year, the proximity of any awards to other significant corporate events is coincidental. In addition, the Committee may make grants at any time during the year it deems appropriate, including with respect to new hires or transitions. A summary of the 2025 terms and applicable award opportunities, granted by the Committee to the NEOs, is provided below.
During the beginning of 2025, the CEO recommended employees (other than with respect to himself) to the Committee for participation in the ELTI for 2025 and their respective specific levels of proposed participation. Awards granted to eligible employees under the ELTI may be in the form of RSUs, PSUs, or both. To pursue the key objective of linking executive compensation with Company performance, the Committee generally aims to deliver at least 50% of the grant value of the 2025 awards as PSUs.
The Committee approved the 2025 RSU awards and PSU awards (for the 36-month performance period of January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027) on February 6, 2025. The 2025 awards are as follows. The Committee approved target LTI
| 36 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
awards for the NEOs as follows: Mr. Carstanjen, $12,000,000; Mr. Mudd, $4,000,000; Ms. Dall, $2,300,000; and Mr. Blackwell, $1,700,000. In light of the existing retentive hold of her existing compensation arrangements and long-term succession planning considerations, Ms. Adams did not participate in the 2025 LTI program. Once the target LTI awards were established, the number of shares subject to the 2025 RSU awards and the 2025 PSU awards was determined based on the closing stock price as of February 6, 2025. The table below sets forth the number of shares subject to the RSUs and PSUs granted to each NEO, which were based on an allocation of approximately 50% RSUs and 50% PSUs. The table also reflects the grant date fair value of the RSUs and PSUs for accounting purposes. Because the accounting value for the PSUs is based on the Monte-Carlo simulation model using the stock price as of the PSU grant date of March 10, 2025, the grant date fair value of the PSUs for accounting purposes may differ from the target LTI award.
| RSUs | PSUs | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Officer | # | $(1) | # | $(2) | # | $(3) | ||||||||||||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
|
48,675 |
|
|
6,000,167 |
|
|
48,674 |
|
|
5,443,213 |
|
|
97,349 |
|
|
11,443,380 |
| ||||||
| William E. Mudd |
|
16,227 |
|
|
2,000,302 |
|
|
16,225 |
|
|
1,814,442 |
|
|
32,452 |
|
|
3,814,744 |
| ||||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
|
9,330 |
|
|
1,150,109 |
|
|
9,330 |
|
|
1,043,374 |
|
|
18,660 |
|
|
2,193,483 |
| ||||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
|
6,897 |
|
|
850,193 |
|
|
6,896 |
|
|
771,180 |
|
|
13,793 |
|
|
1,621,373 |
| ||||||
| (1) | The grant date fair value of the time-vesting RSUs was calculated utilizing the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock as of February 6, 2025 multiplied by the total number of time-vesting RSUs granted. |
| (2) | The grant date fair value for the PSUs was calculated based on the probable achievement of the performance goals and a Monte-Carlo simulation model, which factors in the value of the relative TSR modifier (defined below) that is applied to the award before the share-based payment vests. The PSUs represent the target opportunity, and corresponding fair value, available to the grantees should the Company achieve the pre-determined performance metrics. Actual shares that vest pursuant to the PSUs may be more or less given the performance on the selected metrics discussed below. |
| (3) | Peer group market analyses were performed by FW Cook for the NEO positions, and NEO long-term incentive levels were adjusted after considering those analyses, as deemed appropriate by the Committee. Consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy, adjustments to the target long-term incentive levels were made to better position their long-term incentives compared to the peer group and based on individual and Company performance. |
With respect to the PSU awards in the table above, performance will be based on the following three performance measures during the 36-month period from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027 (the “Performance Period”):
| 1) | 3-Year Cumulative Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) (50% weight). Adjusted EBITDA measured during the three-year period beginning as of the start of the Performance Period relative to the pre-established goals set for such measurement period, will be derived from the Company’s consolidated financial statements with any necessary adjustments similar to those described further below; |
| 2) | 3-Year Cumulative Cash Flow Metric (“Cash Flow Metric”) (50% weight). Cumulative Cash Flow (i.e. the sum of the free cash flows from the annual periods ending December 31 of each of 2025, 2026, and 2027, respectively, where the Cash Flow Metric goals are set at the beginning of each of those three periods) will also be derived from the Company’s consolidated financial statements with any necessary adjustments similar to those described further below; and |
| 3) | Relative Total Shareholder Return Modifier. The Company’s TSR modifier will be determined by ranking the return on the Company’s shares against those of the companies in the Russell 1000 index, in each case, over the Performance Period. The PSU awards determined by the Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Flow Metric performance goals described above will then be adjusted based on the Company’s relative TSR performance, by increasing the PSU awards by 25% if the Company’s TSR is in the top quartile of the Russell 1000 index, decreasing the PSU awards by 25% if the Company’s TSR is in the bottom quartile of the Russell 1000 index, and providing no change to the PSU awards if the Company’s TSR is in the middle two quartiles. |
The maximum number of PSUs that can be earned for the Performance Period is 250% of target, with payout for each performance measure determined by a payout curve, as achievement that lies between two goals will be interpolated. At the end of the Performance Period, the Committee will review performance achieved on each pre-established performance measure. The Committee determined to measure the Adjusted EBITDA performance measure applicable to the 2025 PSUs over three years instead of over a two-year period like the 2024 PSUs in order to increase the long-term focus of the program.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
37 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
With respect to the RSU awards, the RSUs vest in one third (1/3) increments on each of December 31, 2025, December 31, 2026, and December 31, 2027 respectively, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date or as otherwise provided for in the underlying award agreement. The Committee elected to cash-settle the portion of the 2025 RSU awards vesting on December 31, 2025 for Mr. Carstanjen, Mr. Mudd, and Mr. Blackwell. The cash amounts paid to the participating NEOs with respect to the 2025 RSU awards vesting on December 31, 2025 were based upon the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2025 ($113.78 per share). Mr. Carstanjen had elected to defer settlement of 50% of the portion of the 2025 RSU awards vesting on December 31, 2025 and Ms. Dall had elected to defer settlement of the entire portion of the 2025 RSU awards vesting on December 31, 2025, in each case pursuant to the Amended and Restated Churchill Downs Incorporated Equity Award Deferral Plan.
With respect to the performance period and related PSU awards under the ELTI for January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025, the actual performance was certified by the Committee at its February 2026 meeting (with a TSR at 7%, in the top 65% of the Russell 2000 over the performance period) as set forth below:
| $ in Millions | Target | Maximum | Actual | % of Target | Projected Payout |
Weighted Payout |
||||||||||||||||||
| 2-year Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA: |
$ |
2,165.0 |
|
$ |
2,598.0 |
|
$ |
2,183.1 |
|
|
100.8 |
% |
|
102.8 |
% |
|
51.4 |
% | ||||||
| 3-year Cumulative Cash Flow Metric: |
$ |
1,621.0 |
|
$ |
1,945.2 |
|
$ |
1,903.8 |
|
|
117.4 |
% |
|
174.4 |
% |
|
87.2 |
% | ||||||
| Total Weighted Payout: |
|
138.6% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| TSR Modifier: |
|
100% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Target Multiplier: |
|
138.6% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| • | Adjusted EBITDA—as defined in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. |
| 2023 | 2024 | |||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA for Compensation Purposes ($ in millions) |
$ |
1,023.9 |
|
$ |
1,159.2 |
| ||
| • | Cash Flow Metric—Our cash flow metric is defined as Cash Flows from Operating Activities and Discontinued Operations in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, not including the impact from the change in restricted cash, plus distributions of capital from equity investments less capital maintenance expenditures. |
| $ in millions | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |||||||||
| Cash Flow from Operating Activities |
$ |
605.3 |
|
$ |
771.7 |
|
$ |
769.8 |
| |||
| Operating Activities of Discontinued Operations |
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
N/A |
| |||
| Capital Maintenance Expenditures |
$ |
(77.7 |
) |
$ |
(83.6 |
) |
$ |
(70.2 |
) | |||
| Change in Restricted Cash |
$ |
12.0 |
(1) |
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) | |||
| Proceeds from Equity Transaction |
|
N/A |
|
$ |
(14.4 |
) |
$ |
N/A |
| |||
| Cash Flow Metric |
$ |
540.1 |
|
$ |
674.8 |
|
$ |
688.9 |
| |||
| (1) | Change in Restricted Cash excludes receipt of proceeds from the pending United Tote Company equity transaction. |
| • | Total Shareholder Return—defined as the Company’s stock price as of the end of the measurement period, assuming reinvestment of dividends, divided by the Company’s stock price as of the beginning of the measurement period. The Company’s Total Shareholder Return for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025 was 7%. |
| 38 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Name (1) |
Target PSU Award |
Target Multiplier |
PSU Payout (1) |
|||||||||
William C. Carstanjen |
27,222 |
138.6 |
% |
37,726 |
||||||||
William E. Mudd |
12,010 |
138.6 |
% |
16,644 |
||||||||
Marcia A. Dall |
8,808 |
138.6 |
% |
12,207 |
||||||||
Bradley K. Blackwell |
4,404 |
138.6 |
% |
6,103 |
||||||||
Maureen Adams |
4,404 |
138.6 |
% |
6,103 |
||||||||
| (1) | In 2026, the Committee offered the cash-settlement of the 2023 PSU awards to each then-serving NEO. Mr. Carstanjen and Mr. Mudd accepted the Committee’s offer to settle the awards in cash. Accordingly, in February 2026, the 2023 PSU awards were settled in cash after certification by the Committee that the Company achieved the required level of performance. The cash amounts paid to the participating NEOs with respect to the 2023 PSU awards were based upon the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on February 5, 2026 ($93.69 per share). Ms. Dall and Mr. Blackwell elected to receive settlement of the awards in Company Common Stock. |
Executive Officer |
Ownership Guidelines |
Met Guidelines | ||||
William C. Carstanjen |
6x | ✓ | ||||
William E. Mudd |
4x | ✓ | ||||
Marcia A. Dall |
3x | ✓ | ||||
Bradley K. Blackwell |
3x | ✓ | ||||
✓ |
= | Met guidelines. | ||
2026 Proxy Statement |
39 |
40 |
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
that we include these expenses in the total value of personal benefits paid to our CEO, and the aggregate incremental costs of the Company for these expenses are accordingly reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the 2025 Summary Compensation Table.
Post-Termination Arrangements. The Committee believes that arrangements that provide benefits upon termination or a change in control of the Company support the goals of attracting and retaining qualified executives. Such benefits include clarifying the terms of employment and reducing the risks to the executive where the executive believes that either the Company may undergo a merger or be acquired. In addition, the Committee believes that such agreements align the interests of executives with the interests of shareholders if a qualified offer to acquire the Company is made, in that each of the executives would likely be aware of or involved in any such negotiation and it is to the benefit of shareholders to have the executives negotiating in the best interests of the Company without regard to their personal financial interests. The Committee has adopted forms of Executive Change in Control, Severance and Indemnity Agreements (the “Change in Control Agreements”) applicable to the NEOs. The terms of the Change in Control Agreements were determined after considering market data and the input of the Committee’s independent compensation consultant at the time. The Change in Control Agreements provide, subject to the Company receiving a general release of claims from the executive, severance benefits in the event the executive’s employment is terminated (i) by the Company other than for “Cause” (as defined in the Change in Control Agreements) or due to “Disability” (as defined in the Change in Control Agreements) or death or (ii) by the executive for “Good Reason” (as defined in the Change in Control Agreement), with enhanced benefits for a termination in connection with a “Change in Control” (as defined in the Change in Control Agreement). All equity-based awards in effect at the time of termination for the aforementioned reasons will remain governed by the applicable plan or award agreement. The Change in Control Agreements do not provide for any tax gross-ups for excise taxes payable following a Change in Control.
In connection with the announcement of her retirement, Ms. Adams entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Company, which provided for (i) a 2025 bonus under the EAIP, with payout determined based on actual performance for the year, (ii) continued vesting with respect to her outstanding RSU awards and PSU awards as if she remained employed with the Company through the last applicable vesting date and based on actual performance with respect to her PSU awards, (iii) a retention payment of $550,000, subject to her continued employment through December 31, 2025, and (iv) the termination of her Change in Control Agreement. The Company entered into the Memorandum of Understanding to induce Ms. Adams to remain with the Company through December 31, 2025 to allow for an orderly transition of her responsibilities and to minimize disruption within the organization.
Please see the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” section for a summary of the severance benefits payable to the NEOs under their applicable Change in Control Agreements.
Compensation Committee Report
The Committee has reviewed and discussed the information appearing above under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management and, based on that review and discussion, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section be included in this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:
Daniel P. Harrington, Chair
Douglas C. Grissom
Andréa Carter
Paul C. Varga
R. Alex Rankin, ex officio
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
41 |
Table of Contents
2025 Summary Compensation Table
| 2025 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
The following table provides information regarding compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer, President & Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Gaming Operations (sometimes referred to in this proxy statement as the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) in 2025, 2024 and 2023.
| Name and Principal Position |
Year | Base Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2) |
All Other Compensation ($)(3) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen Chief Executive Officer |
2025 | 1,800,000 | -0- | 11,443,380 | 5,763,331 | 166,128 | 19,172,839 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 1,776,923 | -0- | 6,585,361 | 6,714,460 | 26,919 | 15,103,663 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 1,626,923 | -0- | 7,051,043 | 3,511,979 | 21,689 | 12,211,634 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| William E. Mudd President and Chief Operating Officer |
2025 | 1,265,949 | -0- | 3,814,744 | 2,038,106 | 90,687 | 7,209,486 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 1,230,462 | -0- | 2,905,577 | 2,305,298 | 21,561 | 6,462,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 1,184,615 | -0- | 3,111,080 | 1,824,405 | 20,175 | 6,140,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Marcia A. Dall Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
2025 | 944,091 | -0- | 2,193,483 | 1,338,374 | 76,354 | 4,552,302 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 915,156 | -0- | 2,130,886 | 1,508,817 | 28,539 | 4,583,398 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 885,961 | -0- | 2,281,448 | 1,194,073 | 22,945 | 4,384,427 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell Executive Vice President and General Counsel |
2025 | 770,192 | -0- | 1,621,373 | 992,574 | 22,225 | 3,406,364 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 742,308 | -0- | 1,065,443 | 1,119,077 | 20,212 | 2,947,040 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 684,615 | -0- | 1,140,724 | 851,389 | 18,746 | 2,695,474 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Maureen Adams Former Executive Vice President, Gaming Operations |
2025 | 659,349 | 550,000(4) | -0- | 615,101 | 32,932 | 1,857,382 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 640,865 | -0- | 1,065,443 | 864,487 | 26,895 | 2,597,690 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 617,308 | -0- | 1,140,724 | 684,152 | 21,317 | 2,463,501 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | In accordance with the SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, the amounts shown in 2025 for stock awards represent the grant date fair value of such awards determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), but disregarding the estimate of forfeitures, in connection with service-based RSUs and PSUs granted pursuant to the ELTI to each of our NEOs in 2025. The amounts included in the Stock Awards column for the PSUs granted during 2025 are calculated based on the probable satisfaction of the performance conditions for such awards as of the date of grant. Assuming the highest level of performance is achieved for the 2025 PSUs, the maximum value of such PSUs at the grant date would be as follows: Mr. Carstanjen—$13,331,809; Mr. Mudd—$4,444,028; Ms. Dall—$2,555,487; and Mr. Blackwell—$1,888,814. See Note 10 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the amounts reported for 2025. |
| (2) | Amounts in this column represent payments for performance under the EAIP. The NEOs received their 2025 EAIP awards in February 2026. |
| (3) | The table below shows the components of this column for 2025, which include the Company match for each individual’s defined contribution plan contributions, life insurance premiums, supplemental long-term disability insurance premiums, perquisites and other personal benefits. |
| (4) | On June 25, 2025, Ms. Adams notified the Company of her decision to retire from the Company effective December 31, 2025. To incentivize Ms. Adams to remain employed with the Company through December 31, 2025, the Company awarded Ms. Adams a retention award, with payment contingent on Ms. Adams’ continued employment through December 31, 2025. |
| 42 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025
| ALL OTHER COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025
|
| Name |
Company ($) |
Life ($) |
Supplemental ($) |
Perquisites ($) |
Total All Other ($) |
|||||||||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
|
14,000 |
|
|
21,414 |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
128,913 |
|
|
166,128 |
| |||||
| William E. Mudd |
|
14,000 |
|
|
7,055 |
|
|
3,260 |
|
|
66,372 |
|
|
90,687 |
| |||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
|
14,000 |
|
|
16,193 |
|
|
7,041 |
|
|
39,120 |
|
|
76,354 |
| |||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
|
14,000 |
|
|
4,888 |
|
|
3,337 |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
22,225 |
| |||||
| Maureen Adams |
|
14,000 |
|
|
12,668 |
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
32,932 |
| |||||
| (1) | This amount consists of Company contributions to 401(k) plans. |
| (2) | The NEOs receive the following life insurance coverage: (a) Basic Employee Life Insurance policy (“Base Life”) equal to two times (2x) base salary with a $650,000 maximum, and (b) Executive Life Insurance policy (“Executive Life”) equal to two times (2X) base salary. The amounts in this column are the total premiums for the NEOs’ coverage of Base Life and Executive Life. With respect to Base Life, the premiums were $3,096 for Mr. Carstanjen, $1,656 for Mr. Mudd, $4,752 for Ms. Dall, $1,656 for Mr. Blackwell, and $4,752 for Ms. Adams. With respect to Executive Life, the premiums were $18,318 for Mr. Carstanjen, $5,399 for Mr. Mudd, $11,441 for Ms. Dall, $3,232 for Mr. Blackwell, and $7,916 for Ms. Adams. |
| (3) | The NEOs receive long-term disability coverage equal to sixty percent (60%) of their base salary with a $10,000 per month maximum in the event of a long-term disability. The Company offers supplemental long-term disability income insurance to help fill the gap between the executive’s regular monthly net income and the amount that would be paid under the Company’s standard long-term disability insurance policy that is available to other salaried employees. The amounts in this column are the premiums for the NEOs’ supplemental coverage paid by the Company. |
| (4) | For Mr. Carstanjen, Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits consisted of (a) $92,287 representing the aggregate incremental cost for use of the Company’s aircraft, and (b) $36,626 representing security upgrades to his personal residence. For Mr. Mudd and Ms. Dall, Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits represent the aggregate incremental cost for such NEO’s use of the Company’s aircraft. The aggregate incremental cost for use of the aircraft is calculated based on the incremental cost to the Company for fuel, crew travel expenses, landing fees, trip-related hangar/parking costs, and other miscellaneous variable costs of operating the aircraft. Since the Company’s aircraft is used primarily for business travel, we do not include the fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilots’ salaries, depreciation of the purchase costs of our aircraft, and the cost of maintenance not specifically related to trips. From time to time, certain family members or other guests will accompany the NEOs on personal trips when using Company-owned aircraft, at a nominal or no incremental cost to the Company. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
43 |
Table of Contents
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025
| GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025
|
The grants in the following table are generally described in the CD&A, beginning on page 26.
| Estimated Future Payout under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
Estimated Future Payout under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(3) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name |
Approved Date |
Grant Date |
Threshold ($)(4) |
Target ($) |
Max ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Max (#) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
1,687,500 | 4,500,000 | 9,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/06/2025 | 02/06/2025 | 48,675 | 6,000,167 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/06/2025 | 03/10/2025 | 18,253 | 48,674 | 121,685 | 5,443,213 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William E. Mudd |
596,756 | 1,591,350 | 3,182,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/06/2025 | 02/06/2025 | 16,227 | 2,000,302 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/06/2025 | 03/10/2025 | 6,084 | 16,225 | 40,563 | 1,814,442 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
391,875 | 1,045,000 | 2,090,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/06/2025 | 02/06/2025 | 9,330 | 1,150,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/06/2025 | 03/10/2025 | 3,499 | 9,330 | 23,325 | 1,043,374 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
290,625 | 775,000 | 1,550,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/06/2025 | 02/06/2025 | 6,897 | 850,193 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/06/2025 | 03/10/2025 | 2,586 | 6,896 | 17,240 | 771,180 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maureen Adams |
223,784 | 596,756 | 1,193,512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents annual incentive bonus opportunities under the EAIP for each of the NEOs. See “Executive Annual Incentive Plan” beginning on page 34. Actual bonus payments for 2025 are listed under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table on page 42. |
| (2) | Represents the PSUs granted under the ELTI to each of the participating NEOs, which vest based on the Company’s performance with respect to Adjusted EBITDA for compensation purposes and a cash flow metric (each measured over the 2025-2027 performance period). The vesting of these awards is also subject to a TSR modifier measured over the 2025-2027 performance period), which could increase or decrease the number of shares earned under an award by 25%, as more fully explained on pages 36-39. |
| (3) | Represents RSUs granted under the ELTI to each of the participating NEOs, which are scheduled to vest over three years in equal annual installments (on December 31, 2025, December 31, 2026, and December 31, 2027), subject generally to the NEO’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The Committee elected to cash-settle the portion of the 2025 RSU awards vesting on December 31, 2025 for Mr. Carstanjen, Mr. Mudd, and Mr. Blackwell. The cash amounts paid to the participating NEOs with respect to the 2025 RSU awards vesting on December 31, 2025 were based upon the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2025 ($113.78 per share). Mr. Carstanjen had elected to defer settlement of 50% of the portion of the 2025 RSU awards vesting on December 31, 2025 and Ms. Dall had elected to defer settlement of the entire portion of the 2025 RSU awards vesting on December 31, 2025, in each case pursuant to the Amended and Restated Churchill Downs Incorporated Equity Award Deferral Plan. |
| (4) | The EAIP threshold represents a 50% payout of the pre-established financial performance goal, which constitutes 75% of the target EAIP payout, based upon achievement of the minimum annual Adjusted EBITDA target. The individual performance goal has a range of 0% to 200% payout depending on achievement of goals, which constitutes the remaining 25% of the total EAIP payout and is not included in the threshold. |
| 44 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025
| OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025
|
The following table provides information regarding unvested stock awards held by each of the NEOs on December 31, 2025. As of such date, none of our NEOs held any outstanding option awards.
| Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||
| Name |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) |
Equity Incentive Plan Have Not Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) |
||||||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
41,665 | 4,740,644 | 76,317 | 8,683,348 | ||||||||||||
| William E. Mudd |
14,884 | 1,693,502 | 28,421 | 3,233,741 | ||||||||||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
9,202 | 1,047,004 | 18,274 | 2,079,216 | ||||||||||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
6,089 | 692,806 | 11,368 | 1,293,451 | ||||||||||||
| Maureen Adams |
1,491 | 169,646 | 4,472 | 508,824 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Represent awards under the ELTI consisting of RSUs and PSUs for continued employment periods from January 1, 2024—December 31, 2027. The 41,665 RSUs for Mr. Carstanjen vest as follows: 25,440 units on December 31, 2026; and 16,225 units on December 31, 2027. The 14,884 RSUs for Mr. Mudd vest as follows: 9,475 units on December 31, 2026; and 5,409 units on December 31, 2027. The 9,202 RSUs for Ms. Dall vest as follows: 6,092 units on December 31, 2026; and 3,110 units on December 31, 2027. The 6,089 RSUs for Mr. Blackwell vest as follows: 3,790 units on December 31, 2026; and 2,299 units on December 31, 2027. The 1,491 RSUs for Ms. Adams vest on December 31, 2026. |
| (2) | Based on the December 31, 2025 closing price of CHDN of $113.78 per share. |
| (3) | Represent awards under the ELTI consisting of PSUs for certain performance periods from January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2027, which are subject to vesting upon meeting the performance criteria at the end of each applicable performance period. The 76,317 PSUs for Mr. Carstanjen are subject to vesting on the following dates: 27,643 units on December 31, 2026 and 48,674 units on December 31, 2027. The 28,421 PSUs for Mr. Mudd are subject to vesting on the following dates: 12,196 units on December 31, 2026 and 16,225 units on December 31, 2027. The 18,274 PSUs for Ms. Dall are subject to vesting on the following dates: 8,944 units on December 31, 2026 and 9,330 units on December 31, 2027. The 11,368 PSUs for Mr. Blackwell are subject to vesting on the following dates: 4,472 units on December 31, 2026 and 6,896 units on December 31, 2027. The 4,472 PSUs for Ms. Adams are subject to vesting on December 31, 2026. For purposes of this table, the PSUs are reported assuming target performance. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
45 |
Table of Contents
Stock Vested for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025
| STOCK VESTED FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025
|
The following table provides information concerning vesting of stock awards during 2025 for each of the NEOs. None of our NEOs held any stock options during 2025.
| Stock Awards | ||||||||
| Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting |
Value Realized on Vesting(1) |
|||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
|
224,182 |
|
$ |
22,716,539 |
| ||
| William E. Mudd |
|
125,089 |
|
$ |
12,627,630 |
| ||
| Marcia A. Dall |
|
21,235 |
|
$ |
2,170,854 |
| ||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
|
12,995 |
|
$ | 1,370,130 | |||
| Maureen Adams |
|
10,548 |
|
$ |
1,090,430 |
| ||
| (1) | The RSUs vested reflect the market value of the stock on the day the stock vested. In 2026, the Committee offered the then-serving NEOs cash-settlement of the 2023 PSU awards and Mr. Carstanjen and Mr. Mudd accepted the Committee’s offer to settle the awards in cash. Accordingly, in February 2026, the 2023 PSU awards for the participating NEOs were settled in cash after certification by the Committee that the Company achieved the required level of performance, based upon the closing price of the Company’s Common stock on February 5, 2026 ($93.69 per share). Ms. Dall and Mr. Blackwell elected to receive settlement of the awards in Company Common Stock. |
| 46 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025
| NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025
|
The following table provides information regarding the Deferral Plan adopted by the Company, effective January 1, 2020 and compensation that had been previously deferred by the NEOs pursuant to the terms of the Company’s legacy nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
| Name |
Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) |
Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Aggregate Withdrawals Distributions ($) |
Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($)(1)(2) |
|||||||||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferral Plan |
887,825 | -0- | (1,366,648 | ) | -0- | 8,923,725 | ||||||||||||||
| Legacy Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan |
-0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||||||||
| William E. Mudd |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferral Plan |
-0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||||||||
| Legacy Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan |
-0- | -0- | 230,155 | -0- | 1,467,792 | |||||||||||||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferral Plan |
337,699 | -0- | (152,117 | ) | -0- | 1,232,149 | ||||||||||||||
| Legacy Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan |
-0- | -0- | 60,590 | -0- | 462,313 | |||||||||||||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferral Plan |
-0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||||||||
| Legacy Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan |
-0- | -0- | 16,115 | -0- | 127,910 | |||||||||||||||
| Maureen Adams |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferral Plan |
-0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||||||||
| Legacy Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan |
-0- | -0- | 13,511 | -0- | 97,104 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | Amounts in this column represent the market value of RSUs which vested on December 31, 2025 but were elected to be deferred under the Deferral Plan. For purposes of this disclosure, market value is determined using the December 31, 2025 closing price of CHDN of $113.78 per share. |
| (2) | Of the totals in this column, the following totals have been reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the previous three (3) years: |
| Name |
2023 ($) |
2024 ($) |
2025 ($)(1) |
|||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
|
1,358,161 |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
887,825 |
| |||
| William E. Mudd |
|
-0- |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
-0- |
| |||
| Marcia A. Dall |
|
-0- |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
337,699 |
| |||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
|
-0- |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
-0- |
| |||
| Maureen Adams |
|
-0- |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
-0- |
| |||
| (1) | Amounts in this column represent the market value of RSUs which vested on December 31, 2025 but were elected to be deferred under the Deferral Plan. For purposes of this disclosure, market value is determined using the December 31, 2025 closing price of CHDN of $113.78 per share. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
47 |
Table of Contents
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025
Under the Deferral Plan, an account has been established and maintained for each participant, and each participant’s account has been credited with all RSUs and any applicable dividend equivalents allocated to such participant. In December 2024, the Deferral Plan was amended and restated in order to permit participants approved by the Committee to elect to have their earnings on their balances under the plan be calculated based on deemed investment allocations other than notional investments in Company common stock. A participant’s account under the Deferral Plan will be settled on the earlier of: (i) the participant’s separation from service with the Company or (ii) the date fixed in such participant’s plan participation agreement.
The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table above shows information about the Company’s legacy nonqualified deferred compensation plan. In December 2019, this plan was frozen with respect to future contributions. Participants can elect to receive their deferred compensation balance (i) upon termination of employment through a lump sum payment or (ii) while employed by the Company provided that the initial distribution date is at least five years from the initial participation date, in which case distributions may be made on a monthly basis or in a lump sum.
| 48 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
| POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL
|
The Company has entered into certain agreements and maintains certain plans that will require the Company to provide compensation to the NEOs in the event of a termination of employment. None of our compensation arrangements with our NEOs provide for single trigger vesting or severance benefit upon a change in control (“CIC”) of the Company without a related or subsequent qualifying termination of employment. The amount of compensation payable to each continuing NEO in each situation as of December 31, 2025 is listed in the table below. Ms. Adams is excluded from the table below as she retired effective December 31, 2025. Please see below for a description of the payments and benefits received by Ms. Adams in connection with her retirement.
| Name | Cash Severance Payment ($) |
Acceleration & Continuation of Equity Awards ($)(1) |
Total Benefits ($) | |||||||||
| William C. Carstanjen |
||||||||||||
| Involuntary or good reason termination |
17,109,770 | 8,683,500 | (3) | 25,793,270 | ||||||||
| Change in control without termination |
-0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||
| Death or Disability |
4,500,000 | (2) | 8,683,500 | (4) | 13,183,500 | |||||||
| Involuntary or good reason termination within 2 years of a CIC |
17,109,770 | 13,423,992 | (5) | 30,533,762 | ||||||||
| William E. Mudd |
||||||||||||
| Involuntary or good reason termination |
5,891,797 | 3,233,969 | (3) | 9,125,766 | ||||||||
| Change in control without termination |
-0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||
| Death or Disability |
1,591,350 | (2) | 3,233,969 | (4) | 4,825,319 | |||||||
| Involuntary or good reason termination within 2 years of a CIC |
7,324,012 | 4,927,243 | (5) | 12,251,255 | ||||||||
| Marcia A. Dall |
||||||||||||
| Involuntary or good reason termination |
2,993,967 | 2,079,292 | (3) | 5,073,259 | ||||||||
| Change in control without termination |
-0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||
| Death or Disability |
1,045,000 | (2) | 2,079,292 | (4) | 3,124,292 | |||||||
| Involuntary or good reason termination within 2 years of a CIC |
3,991,467 | 3,126,219 | (5) | 7,117,686 | ||||||||
| Bradley K. Blackwell |
||||||||||||
| Involuntary or good reason termination |
2,331,069 | 1,293,565 | (3) | 3,624,634 | ||||||||
| Change in control without termination |
-0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||
| Death or Disability |
775,000 | (2) | 1,293,565 | (4) | 2,068,565 | |||||||
| Involuntary or good reason termination within 2 years of a CIC |
3,106,069 | 1,986,257 | (5) | 5,092,326 | ||||||||
| (1) | Represents the market value as of December 31, 2025 of stock awards accelerated or continued in each scenario. For purposes of this disclosure, market value is determined using the December 31, 2025 closing price of CHDN of $113.78 per share. |
| (2) | Represents the pro rata bonus for the year of death or disability based on the target bonus the executive was eligible to receive for that year. |
| (3) | Represents (i) continued vesting of all unvested RSUs as of the termination date, plus (ii) continued vesting of all PSUs based on performance through the entire performance period, pro-rated for the time the NEO was employed during that performance period. For purposes of this table, all PSUs values are based on target performance. |
| (4) | Represents (i) accelerated vesting of all unvested RSUs as of the termination date, plus (ii) continued vesting of all PSUs based on performance through the entire performance period, pro-rated for the time the NEO was employed during that performance period. For purposes of this table, all PSUs values are based on target performance. |
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
49 |
Table of Contents
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
| (5) | Represents one hundred percent (100%) of all unvested RSU and PSU awards (based on to-date performance as of the termination date) granted under the 2016 Plan and the 2025 Plan. |
Non-Solicit Provisions
The NEOs each entered into an Executive Change in Control, Severance and Indemnity Agreement (the “Change in Control Agreements”) with the Company. Pursuant to each of these agreements, each continuing NEO is subject to a two-year non-solicitation period after the termination of their employment with the Company for any reason, during which they may not solicit any employee of the Company to leave employment with the Company or solicit any customer of the Company for the purpose of engaging in business with them that competes with the business engaged in by the Company. Ms. Adams’ Change in Control Agreement was terminated in connection with her retirement pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between her and the Company.
Severance Benefits
The Change in Control Agreements provide for the following principal severance provisions upon termination by the Company without cause or by the executive upon constructive termination or for good reason (as defined in each agreement):
Mr. Carstanjen and Mr. Mudd. The Change in Control Agreement executed by Mr. Carstanjen and Mr. Mudd in 2018 provides that, upon termination by the Company without cause or by the executive upon constructive termination or for good reason, the executive will be entitled to receive (a) an amount in cash equal to, in the case of Mr. Carstanjen, 2 times and, in the case of Mr. Mudd, 1.5 times the sum of (x) the executive’s annual base salary and (y) the amount of the executive’s annual target bonus for the year in which the executive was terminated, (b) a lump sum amount equal to the prorated in-cycle bonus of executive’s target bonus for the year in which the executive’s termination of employment occurs, (c) treatment of all equity-based awards per the terms of the applicable plan, award or agreement, and (d) a lump sum cash payment equal to the total premiums for medical, dental and vision benefits for a three-month period.
Ms. Dall and Mr. Blackwell. The Change in Control Agreement executed by Ms. Dall in 2020, and Mr. Blackwell in 2022, provides that, upon termination by the Company without cause or by the executive upon constructive termination or for good reason, the executive will be entitled to receive (a) an amount in cash equal to 1.5 times the sum of (x) the executive’s annual base salary and (y) the amount of the executive’s annual target bonus for the year in which the executive was terminated, (b) treatment of all equity-based awards per the terms of the applicable plan, award or agreement, and (c) a lump sum cash payment equal to the total premiums for medical, dental and vision benefits for a three-month period.
Change in Control Benefits. The current agreements for the NEOs also provide for the following change in control provisions: if the executive is terminated within two years following a change in control, the NEO will receive severance as provided above, except that the salary and bonus severance multiple shall in each case be 2x.
In the event that any payments to any of the NEOs are subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, such payments shall be reduced to one dollar ($1) below the maximum amount of payments that will not be subject to such tax; provided, however, that the foregoing limitation shall not apply in the event the total payments to the NEO, on an after-tax basis, would exceed the after-tax benefits to the NEO if such limitation applied. The NEO shall bear the expense of any and all excise taxes due on any payments that are deemed to be “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Code.
Maureen Adams Memorandum of Understanding In connection with the announcement of her retirement, Ms. Adams entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Company, which provided for (i) a 2025 bonus under the EAIP, with payout determined based on actual performance for the year ($615,101), (ii) continued vesting with respect to her outstanding RSU awards and PSU awards as if she remained employed with the Company through the last applicable vesting date and based on actual performance with respect to her PSU awards ($678,470, based on the December 31, 2025 closing price of CHDN of $113.78 and assuming target performance with respect to her PSU awards), (iii) a retention payment of $550,000, subject to her continued employment through December 31, 2025, and (iv) the termination of her Change in Control Agreement.
| 50 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Pay Ratio
| PAY RATIO
|
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing the following disclosure about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees to the annual total compensation of Mr. Carstanjen, our Chief Executive Officer. To understand this disclosure, we think it is important to give context to our operations. Our business is seasonal and relies heavily on seasonal, part-time and hourly workers. In addition, our gaming business operation also employs many part time hourly employees. In total, approximately 75.2% of our workforce consists of hourly employees.
We strive to create a compensation program that is competitive in terms of both the position and the geographic location in which the employee is located. Accordingly, our pay structures vary among employees based on position and geographic location.
Identification of Median Employee
For 2025, we elected to use December 31, 2025 as the date on which to determine our median employee. As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately 8,685 employees. For purposes of identifying the median employee, we ran a report for all year-to-date taxable compensation for employees as of the selection date, and sorted by the total compensation.
Using this methodology, we determined our median employee was a full-time, hourly employee with an annual total compensation of $33,486. We used base cash compensation as our compensation measure as it is the principal form of compensation delivered to all of our employees and annualized compensation for full-time and part-time employees hired during 2025 who did not work an entire year. In determining the annual total compensation of the median employee, we calculated such employee’s compensation in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K as required pursuant to SEC executive compensation disclosure rules. This calculation is the same calculation used to determine total compensation for purposes of the 2025 Summary Compensation Table with respect to each of the NEOs.
Ratio (2025)
|
Median Annual Total Compensation (excluding CEO) |
$ |
33,486 |
| |
|
CEO Annual Total Compensation |
$ |
19,172,839 |
| |
|
Pay Ratio |
|
573 to 1 |
| |
SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and assumptions and, as a result, the pay ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
51 |
Table of Contents
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE |
Year (1) |
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO ($) (2) |
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO ($) (3) |
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($) (2) |
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs ($) (3) |
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: (4) |
Net Income (Loss) (in millions) ($) |
Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) (6) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shareholder Return ($) (4) |
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return ($) (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2024 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
| – | 2025: William E. Mudd; Marcia A. Dall; Bradley K. Blackwell; and Maureen Adams |
| – | 2024: William E. Mudd; Marcia A. Dall; Bradley K. Blackwell; and Maureen Adams |
| – | 2023: William E. Mudd; Marcia A. Dall; Bradley K. Blackwell; and Maureen Adams |
| – | 2022: William E. Mudd; Marcia A. Dall; Bradley K. Blackwell; and Maureen Adams |
| – | 2021: William E. Mudd; Marcia A. Dall; and Austin Miller |
| (2) | Amounts reported in this column represent (i) the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year in the case of Mr. Carstanjen and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the Company’s NEOs other than Mr. Carstanjen. |
| (3) | To calculate “Compensation Actually Paid” under SEC disclosure rules, adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. Reconciliations of the adjustments for Mr. Carstanjen and for the average of the other NEOs are set forth in the tables below. Based on the required methodology for calculating “Compensation Actually Paid” under SEC disclosure rules, “Compensation Actually Paid” fluctuates most significantly based on changes in the Company’s stock price during the vesting period of the award. Accordingly, the values shown as “Compensation Actually Paid” reflect the increase or decrease in the value of such equity awards based on our stock price performance and, for the years prior to vesting, do not reflect compensation actually realized or earned by the NEO. Accordingly, the “Compensation Actually Paid” reflected below includes values for equity awards that may not be earned due to failure to satisfy the vesting conditions or may be earned at levels that differ from the amounts reported below based on the stock price as of the vesting date. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value for purposes of determining the “Compensation Actually Paid” are consistent with the methodology used for calculating the grant date fair value for financial reporting purposes and, in the case of PSUs, are valued based on the probable achievement of the performance condition as of the applicable measurement date or, upon vesting, based on actual achievement. |
52 |
2026 Proxy Statement |
PEO ($) |
Other NEOs Average ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary Compensation Table - Total Compensation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year |
( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||||||||||||||
+ Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
+/- Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years |
( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
+ Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
+/- Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year |
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
= Compensation Actually Paid |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (4) | Pursuant to SEC rules, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2020. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. |
| (5) | The TSR Peer Group consists of the following peer group, which represents the same peer group used for our competitive compensation analysis, as described in “Factors Used to Evaluate Pay Decisions” in the CD&A. |
| – | For 2024 and 2025, the peer group included Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ALL); Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD); Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR); DraftKings Inc. (DKNG); Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLTR); Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc. (GLPI); MGM Resorts International (MGM); PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN); Red Rock Resorts Inc. (RRR); Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW); and Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). |
| – | For 2021, 2022, and 2023, the peer group included Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ALL); Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD); Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR); DraftKings Inc. (DKNG); Flutter Entertainment PLC (FLTR); Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc. (GLPI); Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp (MSGE) (for 2023, subsequent to its selection as part of the peer group, this entity spun-off Sphere Entertainment Co (SPHR) into a stand-alone public company, with Sphere becoming the relevant peer company); MGM Resorts International (MGM); PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN); Red Rock Resorts Inc. (RRR); Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW); and Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). |
| (6) | As noted in the CD&A, 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. |
2026 Proxy Statement |
53 |
● |
Relationship Between “Compensation Actually Paid” to the PEO and Average Other NEOs and the Company’s Cumulative TSR— 7-Year Grant. Similarly, the other NEOs’ “Compensation Actually Paid” was impacted primarily by the effect of the change in stock price on Mr. Mudd’s 7-Year Grant. This relationship is further illustrated in the following chart which shows the alignment between our “Compensation Actually Paid” and TSR performance. |
54 |
2026 Proxy Statement |
● |
Relationship Between “Compensation Actually Paid” to the PEO and Average Other NEOs and the Company’s Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA— |
2026 Proxy Statement |
55 |
● |
Relationship Between the Company’s TSR and the Peer Group TSR— |
56 |
2026 Proxy Statement |
● |
● |
● |
3-Year Cumulative Cash Flow |
● |
2026 Proxy Statement |
57 |
Table of Contents
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION(1)
|
| Plan Category |
(a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
(b) Weighted-Average |
(c) Number of Securities |
|||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(2) |
688,875 | (3)(4) | -0- | 3,054,205 | (5) | |||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
-0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||
| Total |
688,875 | -0- | 3,054,205 | |||||||||
| (1) | This table provides information, as of December 31, 2025, about CHDN Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and settlement of other equity awards under all compensation plans under which equity securities are reserved for issuance. |
| (2) | The equity compensation plans of the Company which have been approved by the shareholders of the Company and pursuant to which equity securities are authorized for issuance are the Churchill Downs Incorporated 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Stock Purchase Plan”), the 2016 Plan, and the 2025 Plan. |
| (3) | Includes 150,224 PSUs and 232,769 RSUs that were outstanding on December 31, 2025 under the 2016 Plan and the 2025 Plan. For purposes of this table, we have included the number of shares issuable under outstanding PSUs assuming performance targets are achieved. Please see the CD&A for further information regarding the 2025 PSUs, including performance metrics applicable to such awards. |
| (4) | Because each participant in the Stock Purchase Plan has one option each plan year and that option consists of the number of shares which can be purchased, through exercise, at the end of the plan year using compensation deductions made throughout the plan year, no outstanding options, warrants or rights for a specific number of the Company’s securities to be issued upon exercise existed at December 31, 2025 and, therefore, none are included in this total for the Stock Purchase Plan. |
| (5) | Of this total, as of December 31, 2025, 941,294 shares of Common Stock of the Company remained available for future issuance under the Stock Purchase Plan and 2,112,911 shares of Common Stock of the Company remained available for future issuance under the 2025 Plan. Stock awards under the 2025 Plan will be counted against the maximum number of shares as to which stock awards may be granted on a ratio of 1-to-1. |
| 58 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
| CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
The Company has adopted written policies and procedures for identifying and approving or ratifying related person transactions. The policies and procedures cover all related person transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. The Audit Committee is responsible for applying the policies and procedures. In evaluating related person transactions, the Audit Committee considers all factors it deems appropriate, including without limitation, whether the related person transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction, and whether products or services of a similar nature, quantity, or quality are readily available from alternative sources.
Directors of the Company may from time to time own or have interests in horses racing at the Company’s tracks. All such races are conducted, as applicable, under the regulations of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, the Louisiana State Racing Commission, the Ohio State Racing Commission, the Maryland Racing Commission, the Virginia Racing Commission, and the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission, and no director receives any extra or special benefit with regard to having his or her horses selected to run in races or in connection with the actual running of races.
In its ordinary course of business, the Company may enter into transactions with certain of its officers and directors for the sale of personal seat licenses and suite accommodations at its racetracks, and tickets for its live racing events. The Company believes that each such transaction has been on terms no less favorable for the Company than could have been obtained in a transaction with a third party and no such person received any extra or special benefit in connection with such transactions.
Since January 1, 2025, no transaction was identified as a related party transaction.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
59 |
Table of Contents
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
| DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS
|
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s Common Stock file certain reports with the SEC with regard to their beneficial ownership of the Common Stock. The Company is required to disclose in this Proxy Statement any failure to file or late filings of such reports. Based solely on our review of the forms filed with the SEC or written representations from certain reporting persons received by us, we believe that our directors, officers and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s Common Stock have complied with all applicable filing requirements.
| 60 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Multiple Shareholders Sharing the Same Address
| MULTIPLE SHAREHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME ADDRESS
|
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Proxy Statement or Notice addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies.
At this time, one or more brokers with accountholders who are Company shareholders will be “householding” our proxy materials. A single Proxy Statement or Notice will be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholder. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate Proxy Statement or Notice, please notify your broker. You may direct your written request for a copy of the Proxy Statement or Notice to Churchill Downs Incorporated, Attn: Joseph Quinn, 600 N. Hurstbourne Parkway, Ste. 400, Louisville, Kentucky 40222, or at (502) 636-4400. If your broker is not currently “householding” (i.e., you received multiple copies of the Company’s Proxy Statement or Notice), and you would like to request delivery of a single copy, you should contact your broker.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
61 |
Table of Contents
Proposals by Shareholders
| PROPOSALS BY SHAREHOLDERS
|
Any shareholder proposal that may be included in the Board of Directors’ Proxy Statement and proxy for presentation at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2027 must be received by the Company at the principal executive office at 600 N. Hurstbourne Parkway, Ste. 400, Louisville, Kentucky 40222, Attention of the Secretary, no later than November 12, 2026. Pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the Company’s 2027 annual meeting of shareholders, but not included in the Proxy Statement, must be received by the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, any shareholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2027 annual meeting of shareholders of the Company must be received in writing by the Company at its principal executive offices no later than January 21, 2027, and no sooner than December 22, 2026 and otherwise comply with the requirements set forth in the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws. Any proposal submitted before or after those dates will be considered untimely, and the Chairman shall declare that the business is not properly brought before the meeting and such business shall not be transacted at the annual meeting. In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the management’s nominees at the Company’s 2027 annual meeting of shareholders must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than February 22, 2027.
| By Order of the Board of Directors |
| R. ALEX RANKIN |
| Chairman |
| BRADLEY K. BLACKWELL |
| Executive Vice President and |
| General Counsel, |
| Secretary |
Louisville, Kentucky
March 12, 2026
PLEASE VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR OVER THE INTERNET
IF YOU CANNOT ATTEND VIRTUALLY
| 62 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix A
| APPENDIX A
|
We use non-GAAP measures, including Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). We believe that the use of Adjusted EBITDA as a key performance measure of results of operations enables management and investors to evaluate and compare from period to period our operating performance in a meaningful and consistent manner. Our chief operating decision maker utilizes Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate segment performance, develop strategy, and allocate resources. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental measure of our performance that is not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (as determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our operating results.
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted for the following:
Adjusted EBITDA includes our portion of EBITDA from our equity investments and the portion of EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests.
Adjusted EBITDA excludes:
| ● | Transaction expense, net which includes: |
| – | Acquisition, disposition, and property sale related charges; and |
| – | Other transaction expense, including legal, accounting, and other deal-related expense; |
| ● | Stock-based compensation expense; |
| ● | Rivers Des Plaines’ impact on our investments in unconsolidated affiliates from legal reserves, and transaction costs; |
| ● | Asset impairments, net; |
| ● | Gain on property sales; |
| ● | Legal reserves; |
| ● | Pre-opening expense; and |
| ● | Other charges, recoveries, and expenses |
The property associated with Arlington International Racecourse (“Arlington”) was sold on February 15, 2023 to the Chicago Bears. Arlington’s results and exit costs in 2023 are treated as an adjustment.
On June 26, 2023, the Company’s management agreement for Lady Luck in Farmington, Pennsylvania expired and was not renewed.
| 2026 Proxy Statement |
|
A-1 |
Table of Contents
Appendix A
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in millions) |
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||
| Net income attributable to Churchill Downs Incorporated |
$ | 383.0 | $ | 426.8 | $ | 417.3 | ||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
2.5 | 2.3 | ||||||||||
| Net income |
385.5 | 429.1 | 417.3 | |||||||||
| Adjustments: |
||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
233.1 | 199.1 | 169.0 | |||||||||
| Interest expense |
297.7 | 289.8 | 268.4 | |||||||||
| Income tax provision |
146.9 | 144.1 | 144.5 | |||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense |
30.2 | 36.1 | 32.9 | |||||||||
| Legal reserves |
— | — | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||
| Pre-opening expense |
11.7 | 29.6 | 18.6 | |||||||||
| Arlington exit costs |
— | — | 9.4 | |||||||||
| Other expense, net |
10.1 | 4.2 | 7.0 | |||||||||
| Transaction (benefit) expense, net |
5.1 | (12.1 | ) | 4.8 | ||||||||
| Asset impairments, net |
47.5 | 3.9 | 24.6 | |||||||||
| Other income, expense: |
||||||||||||
| Interest, depreciation and amortization expense related to equity investments |
38.6 | 42.0 | 40.2 | |||||||||
| Rivers Des Plaines’ legal reserves and transactions costs |
— | 0.3 | — | |||||||||
| Other charges and recoveries, net |
(1.1 | ) | (6.9 | ) | 2.4 | |||||||
| Gain on the sale of assets |
— | — | (114.0 | ) | ||||||||
| Total adjustments |
819.8 | 730.1 | 606.6 | |||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 1,205.3 | $ | 1,159.2 | $ | 1,023.9 | ||||||
| A-2 |
|
2026 Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
|
Mediant P.O. BOX 8016, CARY, NC 27512-9903 |
| Churchill Downs Incorporated
|
|
Internet: www.proxypush.com/CHDN • Cast your vote online • Have your Proxy Card ready • Follow the simple instructions to record your vote
Phone: 1-866-284-6863 • Use any touch-tone telephone • Have your Proxy Card ready • Follow the simple recorded instructions
Mail: • Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card • Fold and return your Proxy Card in the postage-paid envelope provided
Virtual: You must register to attend the meeting online and/or participate at www.proxydocs.com/CHDN | ||||
|
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
|
||||||
|
For Shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 2, 2026 |
||||||
|
Tuesday, April 21, 2026 9:00 AM, Eastern Time |
||||||
|
Annual Meeting to be held live via the Internet. Please visit |
||||||
|
www.proxydocs.com/CHDN for more details.
|
||||||
| YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! | ||||||
This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints Karole F. Lloyd and Paul C. Varga (the “Named Proxies”), and each or either of them, as the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of them, to vote all the shares of capital stock of Churchill Downs Incorporated which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said meeting and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given.
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, SHARES WILL BE VOTED IDENTICAL TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATION. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The Named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign (on the reverse side) and return this card.
PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD AND MARK ON THE REVERSE SIDE
Copyright © 2026 BetaNXT, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved
Table of Contents
|
Churchill Downs Incorporated Annual Meeting of Shareholders
|
| Please make your marks like this: |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE:
FOR ON PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3
| PROPOSAL
|
YOUR
|
BOARD OF | ||||||||
| 1. | Election of Class III Directors | |||||||||
| FOR | WITHHOLD | |||||||||
| 1.01 Douglas C. Grissom | ☐ | ☐ | FOR | |||||||
| 1.02 Daniel P. Harrington | ☐ | ☐ | FOR | |||||||
| FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | ||||||||
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | FOR | |||||
| 3. | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | FOR | |||||
You must register to attend the meeting online and/or participate at www.proxydocs.com/CHDN
Authorized Signatures - Must be completed for your instructions to be executed.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your account. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy/Vote Form.
|
|
| |||||||
| Signature (and Title if applicable) | Date | Signature (if held jointly) | Date | |||||