Executive readout · one minute
Call research workspace
Read the call alongside every captured source. Transcript, audio, 6-K call announcement stay in one workspace.
Earnings call · FY2026 Q2
Executive readout · one minute
Read the call alongside every captured source. Transcript, audio, 6-K call announcement stay in one workspace.
Management tone
Confident
Net tone +82 · low hedging
Forward guidance
2 guided metrics
Management's latest ranges and targets are included below.
Research coverage
3 live sources
Switch sources without leaving this page or losing your listening position.
Open the source you need; every reader stays inside this workspace.
Stated verbally and extracted from the transcript.
| Metric | Period | Guided | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Operational cash flow
2027
|
$700M – $1B | — | |
|
New building installments (capex commitments)
end of this year
|
$375M – $390M | — |
Listen and read together
The spoken word highlights as audio plays. Select any word to seek to that moment.
good morning good afternoon and welcome to the earnings conference call for the second quarter of 2026 of cmb tech my name is alexander saveris i'm the ceo of cmb tech and i'm joined by my colleagues joris damman and enya dirkindren we will start as always with our financials and some highlights and before we do we give you an overview of the fleet of cmb tech you can see that we have 206 vessels on the water, with another 26 new buildings coming. Our contract backlog is stable at $3.3 billion. The fleet is young. We have an average age below six years. Our capex commitments, we will discuss a bit later, have now gone down to less than $1 billion. We have a market cap of $5.2 billion, a fair market value of the fleet of $11.2 billion. And for those who might not know, but we are still listed in New York, in Brussels, and in Oslo. Our second quarter, financials. The title of our press release was Making Hay, Making Hay While the Sun Shines. These are exceptional times for shipping and also exceptional times for CMB Tech. The company has made a profit of $364.4 million in the second quarter. This was on the back of an increased revenue of over $700 million and an exceptional profit that we made on the sale of assets of $127 million. You can see the other items in our profit and loss that stick out. One of them is the net finance expense. We are reducing our quarterly net finance expense to $76 million, which is a 5% reduction compared to the first quarter. This is led by cheaper refinancings and also just a general repayment of our debt. Our EBITDA stood at $552 million. Our liquidity slightly below $400 million. equity on total assets book value stands at above 35 percent and our equity on total assets value adjusted is now above 50 percent at 51.5 percent for the highlights during the quarter i already mentioned our net profit and our ebitda the liquidity which stands at around 400 million We have a contract backlog which is stable. We have added during the quarter two two-year charters on our CSOVs and one one-year VLCC charter. We have the intention to distribute an amount of 64 cents per share which will be split in an intermediary dividend of $21 per share and a payment of $0.43, so $0.21 per share, and $0.43 per share out of the share premium reserve, which is exempt from any withholding tax. We have taken delivery in the second quarter and quarter to date of nine new building vessels. These were four Newcastle Maxis, one VLCC, two brand new Suez Maxes, one CSOV and one CTV. We have sold quite a few ships so far this year. In the second quarter, we have delivered to their new owners two VLCCs, the Ilma and the Ingrid, on which we booked a capital gain of 98 million dollars. We have sold an older Suez Max, the Sienna, with a capital gain of 29 million dollars. So total gain in second quarter was 127 million in the third quarter we will book a gain of 100 million dollars on the sale of two Suez maxes and in the fourth quarter we will add a gain of 130 million dollars on the sale of the Donusa which is a VLCC and one more Suez max the sales of our tankers We believe are very well timed. We are at historic high prices for VLCCs and Suez Maxes. On this slide, you can basically see the 10-year average for a five-year-old VLCC and a five-year-old Suez Max compared to today's values and also compared to the last 10 years minimum and maximum. And as you can see, on VLCCs and Suez Maxes, we are well above the 10-year average. We are also well above the maximum of over the last 10 years that we have seen. We therefore believe it's a good time to sell some of our assets, particularly our older assets. And then we have put a comparison where other segments stand, like Panamax and Cape Sizes. As you can see that today's values, even though they're at the top end of what we have seen over the last 10 years, they are still in line of that bracket. Same goes for VLGCs. Of course on the container vessels the situation is different and also on LNGs. We wanted to show you what we believe in 2027 our operational cash flow could be based on certain rate assumptions. So we have put the rate assumptions at the bottom right of the slide, with a 10% and 20% uplift. Rate assumptions for 2027 have been based on FFAs and assumptions for next year. You can see the numbers there. What you then see is, after having repaid or paid all our CapEx investments, we still are forecasting a cash flow of $700 million to $1 billion. I would say that's a very powerful figure to see, that even after all our capexes have been repaid, our operational cash flow will be between $700 million and $1 billion. Of course, if the market changes, the numbers will change, but it gives you an indication of the cash flow generating potential of all our different divisions. The most important, of course, are Newcastle Maxes and Cape Sizes, our VLCCs and Suez Maxes. I mentioned the CAPEX. We still have $890 million of new buildings to be delivered, of new building installments to be made. Of that number, the vast majority has already been financed. We have an unfunded CAPEX of $119 million, which is basically spread out this year, $43 million, and then other amounts in 27, 28, and 29, which are relatively small. At the end of this year, our outstanding CAPEX commitment will be between $375 and $390 million. So we've come to the end of our large two-and-a-half-year new building investment plan. I want to give you an update on the market and talk about Bosimar, Euronav, Delphys, Bochem, and Windcat. And I always start with an overview of the different markets we operate in. And what we feel is the sentiment and the state of the market, starting with dry bulk. Clearly, we are positive on dry bulk. We see that demand on the major commodities we are moving is growing. That goes for iron ore, bauxite, grain and coal. The order book to fleet has increased a little bit on capesizes, actually decreased a little bit on Panamax. We are around the 15% mark, which we still think is something that the market can take for the next couple of years. The age of the fleet, 41% of our capes are older than 15 years. More than one third of the Panamaxes are older than 15 years. The balance between supply and demand on dry bulk, we believe, is positive. Moving to tankers, you can see that we have colored from positive to cautious and basically kept a positive and cautious approach. No doubt the market is very positive today. We are seeing all time high rates on second hand numbers, on the freight numbers, on the spot market. So the market is very, very, very strong. The reason we are becoming a little bit more cautious is that on the demand side, we don't know what the effect will be of a potential solution in the Strait of Hormuz. Obviously, we don't know the timing, but that solution could lead to softer markets. What worries us a bit more is the order book to fleet. We are now seeing an order book to fleet on VLCCs and Suez Maxes of over 30%. This is not impacting the market right now. The order book for 2026 is still very reasonable, but as from next year and the year after, we will see a tsunami of VLCC and Suez Maxis coming to the market. Moving to containers and the chemical tankers, we have had a cautious approach to both markets. Actually, the container market has surprised to the upside. The unwinding of the Red Sea rerouting has been postponed with the renewed tensions around Bappermandeep and the Houthi attacks. But when you look at the order book, we would still be quite cautious for containers going forward. But right now, the market on containers is still quite good. On the chemical tankers, the order book is something we are watching closely. The market has actually performed relatively well, but going forward, we take a slight cautious approach. As you know, both in Delphys and Bochem, our container and chemical tanker division, we have close to no spot exposure, so we are very well covered and shielded from any market fluctuations. Our last division, wind cut, offshore energy. We are seeing good rates. We believe if you look at the demand for the offshore wind energy projects, but also offshore oil and gas projects, combined with the order book with the fleet that is coming. There is a substantial fleet of CSOVs coming to the market next year and in 2028, but combined with the demand that we see in oil and gas and wind, we believe that the balance is positive. I want to zoom in on certain specific dynamics in our subsectors, starting with dry bulk. First, our dashboard, what we have done in the second quarter. Our fleet today is 40 Newcastle Maxes on the water, 37 Capes and 30 Kamzhar Maxes and Panama Maxes. The performance in the second quarter was very good. We earned $46,000 on our nukes, close to $40,000 on our capes, and $20,000 on our Panamaxes. The rates for the third quarter are in line with the rates of the second quarter. So far, what we have booked in Q3 is slightly below Q2 because we have positioned quite some vessels into interesting front hole positions. And we would normally see a bump on our rates towards the end of Q3 and into Q4. A lot of the indicators on dry bulk are green. Some indicators like iron ore inventories and steel ore inventories are slightly negative. But overall, we see that the demand side of things is looking very positive. Looking at order book to fleet, before we zoom in on the demand, one can see that the order book has grown. we are now in a cape size order book to fleet of 17 percent panamax has actually gone down slightly we're at 14 spread out nicely over the next couple of years so so far we don't believe that the order book to fleet is an issue the average age of the fleet is actually a very positive the fleet is aging very little scrapping going on so that has the potential to help the market in the next couple of years. The volumes, we are seeing iron ore, coal actually supporting the market. So on our Cape sizes, it's iron ore, bauxite, and a little bit of coal. On the Panamax, it's coal, grain, and some of the other commodities. When you look at what has been transported, we see that there is growth. Bauxite seasonally dips in the second quarter, but we have seen a very interesting pickup recently so strong second quarter volumes on all dry bulk commodities when we look at the iron ore specifically it's a china australia brazil story and an interesting story that we are seeing is the fe content overall chinese iron ore imports and chinese iron ore imports are reducing in fe content a little bit and we are seeing a lower production domestic production in china on the iron ore both these elements if you compare 2026 with what we are expecting for 2027 could add another 2.5 percent of extra iron ore imports into china so something to watch the fe content and domestic chinese production which is going down and being replaced by higher fe content iron ore coming from abroad and being imported via sea but there's a new kid on the block since a couple of years the importance of africa is increasing we wanted to highlight this on this slide here you can see the volumes from some major commodities from major export areas some of which have been around for a long time some of which are new to the game like Simandu in Guinea, you can see that the growth from 25 to 26 is massive, but is actually expected to grow even further at an average rate of 11 percent. Why do we believe this could be a very interesting dynamic for our markets in the next three to four years? The Simandu iron ore particularly is being produced at a relatively low breakeven cost and could replace shorter whole iron ore going forward we have tried to list some of the break-even costs of some mines on the right side of the slide if that iron ore would be replaced by cheaper simandu iron ore you could get a kick of seven percent in tonne miles for the cape size fleet so africa is definitely someone something to watch and it's particularly simandu and the effects in the next couple of years. I wanted to say a word about El Nino as well. We have two slides on El Nino and I'm sure my colleague Yoris can talk to you about that for a little bit longer than what I will do now. But what we wanted to do here is to show that based on previous experience and the El Nino phenomenon in 2023 and 2024, we could see a positive effect for the dry bulk market and particularly for the panamax fleet in dry bulk and it's basically three dynamics on the one hand less water in the panama canal could limit the transits now typically panamaxes carry low value commodities and cannot compete in the auction system to go through the panama canal with the container vessels and therefore don't transit anymore and therefore have to reroute and have a longer distance. There is a grain kicker to the dry block market as well, thanks to El Nino, where short haul grain trades, for instance, Australia, where it's hotter and drier, produce less grain, are being replaced by longer haul grain, for instance, from South America, where better crops are being grown. And then there's another one on the coal, where hotter weather leads to higher electricity demand. And obviously, on coal, we also have the impact of Hormuz. So all combined, we think that El Nino could have a slight positive effect on the dry bulk market and Panamax in particular. And we tried to show this and prove this with this slide here, where you can basically see the effect of the May 2023 to May 2024 last El Nino and what it has an effect on rates, and basically rates doubled, even tripled over the space of six months. Moving to tankers and Euronav dashboard on our VLCCs and Swissmaxes, we have five VLCCs, four on the water, one that we'll deliver towards the end of this year. We have 15 Swissmaxes. You can see the results that we achieved in the second quarter, above 120 000 in q2 for v's uh already so far fixed in q3 uh the same number on our suez maxis we reached a rate of hundred and twenty three thousand dollars we are slightly below 120 000 q3 to date so stellar numbers very good numbers obviously we have sold some vessels the new sales are the Donussa and the Bristol, but we have delivered as well VLCCs to their new owners in the second quarter. And you can see all the capital gains that we did there, which I mentioned in the introduction. When you look at the dashboard and all the specific indicators, one stands out, of course, it's the oil supply from OPEC countries year on year, which is significantly down but i will highlight some more details in the next couple of slides first talk about the order book this it is big and it is growing um you can see here year per year on vlccs and our sues maxes what is on order um 370 v's 250 sues maxes this is a very very large order book which is not going to be an issue this year but as from next year in 2027 2028 we will get a delivery of 1v or suiz max every two days which eventually could lead to an oversupply even though we know there is still an aging fleet but when you look at the old vessel numbers they are now inferior to the order book whereas over the last four five years it was the opposite So, order book, something to watch for the next couple of years. On the demand side, we have analyzed what happened with seaborne crude. What we can see between January 2026 and June 2026, we went from 31 million barrels per day to 22.3 million barrels per day. And it's very interesting to see where the reduction came from. All in all, when you look at the total lost export volumes to the different major destinations, you come to a number of 8.5 million spread out, China 4.3 million barrels lost, India 1.8, Japan 600,000 barrels, the US close to 400,000 barrels, and the rest of the world 400,000 barrels. What is interesting is that the Chinese lost import is basically a combination of less volumes from the Middle East, but also less volumes from other places in the world. Whereas you see that the other destinations, they surely have lost volumes from the Middle East, but they have actually increased their exports from other places in the world. And the reason we're saying this is that China is the single reason that we have not seen the barrel of oil at a much higher price than we have seen. They have basically single-handedly balanced the supply and demand story in oil by controlling it thanks to their massive reserves. And you can actually see here how the stockpiles of China have been evolving and how it allows them to be picky on when they decide to import, depending on the price and depending on how they position themselves geopolitically. We believe that the power of OPEC as a producing block is now in the oil markets moving to even more to China as a big buyer. And the numbers show it. And actually, you see this on this slide as well, whereas you see that the non-Chinese Asian importers have very quickly increased their imports above the levels that we saw last year. China is still way below the levels that they had last year or at the beginning of the year. And this is really something to watch because as a situation in the Middle East normalizes, it will be very interesting to see how quickly China will start restocking or whether they will wait for lower prices. Moving to the container markets. As I said, the exposure of our company on containers is not very high. I think the one thing I can say about the container markets is that it has been much better performing than what we would have expected this red sea unwinding has been delayed meaning that more vessels are rerouting via africa meaning more vessels are needed volumes have been actually also better than expected so all in all container markets are good but i've said this in the previous quarters we are cautious when we look at the supply and demand going forward because there's still a lot of ships on order. Chemical tankers, our fleet of 16 vessels, eight are on the water, another eight will be delivered. Most of our fleet is fixed on 10-year and seven-year contracts. We have two ships operating in a pool. You can see the results there. The chemical market is actually doing relatively okay. We are watching the product tanker markets, whether they will keep up at a certain level or where they will start eating into the chemical tanker market but so far we believe we are in an okay situation we are watching the order book for 27 and 28 and then finishing off with a very nice picture of our windcat rotterdam and the offshore wind markets. We have recently fixed two of our CSOVs to the offshore oil and gas for two years. We are seeing in the CSOV market, it's a market of the wind on the one hand, which is necessitating extra CTVs, extra CSOVs, but where projects have been a little bit slow to materialize over the past two years, and a combination of the offshore oil and gas markets, which are actually needing modern vessels and are pulling away some of the wind vessels into their market. If you combine both, even with the order books of CSOVs that we are seeing this year in 27 and in 28, the market is very well balanced. And actually, the market is quite strong. You can see that we achieved some very good rates in the second quarter on our CSOVs of $64,000. For Q3, we have already booked two-thirds of our days at $50,000, which, as you can see with the break-even numbers, are very good and profitable for our WindCat division. That sums up the presentation. There is one point I wanted to mention, which we have not tackled, but we have received quite a few questions about our bond.
As you know, on the 14th of September, our bond expires we have decided to repay the bond from our own cash that we have available so we intend to repay the bond on the 14th of september we will not refinance the bond we will repay it i would hand over now to enya for the q a yes we will now start with the q a session if you would like to ask a question please raise your hand make sure to introduce yourself and unmute before asking your question if you are unable to unmute you can also use the q a section to ask your question and then for telephone participants please type star five to raise your hand and star six to unmute and if you have any follow-up questions you can always send an email to joris his email address is here and also in the press release So now we will take the first question that is coming from Frode Mörkedal. You can now unmute and ask your question, please.
Yeah, thank you. Yeah, this is Frode from Clarkson.
Yeah, since you started with the bond, just to confirm, that won't impact the dividends. As you see it, hopefully. No, we don't expect this to impact the dividends. yeah so the dividend has been uh two quarters right now with 50 payout so that seems like a new trend as we expected so yeah uh i guess investors should still think 50 of net profit including vessel sales gains is the de facto policy i i of course understand that you have like you know you can change it but uh seems like a good good target i think it seems like a very good target but as you correctly say um we are not going to change our policy um but look uh it's been two quarters uh where we have uh tried to achieve that level um and uh depending on our investments depending on new projects that might come up uh we believe that uh trying to reward our shareholders at this level is is a thing we want to continue to do that's very good um yeah so it seems like you're a bit concerned on the tanker order book uh and you have uh sold off ships so uh how do you weigh let's say and you even sold this modern uh ship Swissmax 2014 built right um or 2024 built but before yeah yeah so how do you weigh you know continue holding on
to these ships that make a lot of cash flow versus selling at this time there's always three things you can do you operate spot you fix on tc or you sell your vessel and we believe that definitely on some of the vessels that we have sold the price that we saw was something that we should do because of the extreme value that we could create. Does that mean that we will sell even more vessels? No, it's really on a case-per-case basis. We like the tanker market. As you know, we have some charter cover on some of our vessels. We have some very modern assets still in our fleet. But I think, you know, just look at the numbers of the past 30 years. prices we are seeing today, particularly for some of our VLCCs and Suez Maxes, are an opportunity we want to take and then take some money off the table.
Yeah, makes sense and any capital gain that's included in the dividend, that's very good. Just like the last question I had, like a bigger picture, you know, it seems like some of these Middle East companies that are buying up tankers, you know, to run the shuttle services and, you know, it can pay a lot, basically, for tanker assets today. So how do you feel about the current, let's say, vessel value and potential for further increases?
I think it's already very high. Can it increase more? It can definitely increase more. i agree with you that some of the middle eastern operators are taking a strategic view where the price they pay for the ship is not as important as having the security of an access to a vessel that can shuttle out their oil it remains to be seen how long this will last but for the time being there are still definitely buyers out there that want to buy secondhand tonnage at these kind of prices yeah which makes sense of course if you are one these guys that can ship out oil from the inside the middle east you're making more than 500 000 per day or something like that right so obviously the payback on any ship is quite high and so you
know you have a group of people that basically sets the price for the market so that's very interesting dynamics anyway that's uh all the question i had thank you very much thank you then we move on uh christophe somewhere you can now unmute and ask your question please yes um uh good afternoon christophe sama kbc securities uh congrats on on on um on the results uh alexander um yeah seems like the pieces of the puzzle are falling perfectly in place for you guys i mean you're you're recycling cash in in crew tankers uh gold notion acquisition was very well time this was the the new build ordering of the nukes at bossimar um yeah and and and then i come back again on on on on capital allocation because you you indicate that uh new builds is is expensive steel is expensive you declared a new cash return of 64 cents um the loan to value is coming down You have an across the cycle LTV target of 50%, but could you maybe give a hint for a range at peak or trough asset values where you feel comfortable at being a diversified shipping platform? that would be uh the first and then second on um on bunker fuels um could you quantify the impact if any on on on vessel supply through uh speed reductions in in in the dry bulk segment that you uh that you have seen uh in in the market over the past quarter and then um as a follow-up um concerning the situation in the middle east um is there any risk in a certain region that there will not be you know that there will be bunker fuel shortages that could impact your operations
thank you okay thanks a lot christoph um so first your question on the target on ltv we have a target throughout the cycle of 50 and your question is If that significantly improves, will this change your capital allocation strategy, for instance, on dividends or investments or divestments? I would say that today it's probably a little bit too early to say because we are only in the second quarter of this very strong market. We would like to see how much legs this market has before we really want to change our capital allocation strategy. So we will keep a discretionary dividend policy. We will keep on telling you that even though we come at the end of our CapEx program, there could be investments down the line. I'm not seeing any obvious ones right now. I've said this in the last quarterly call. New buildings are very expensive. I'm not excluding one of new buildings, you know, interesting projects that we could do. But it's too early, Kistof, to basically state something new than we have said in the past. If this changes, if we see, you know, after another one or two very strong quarters, more visibility on cash flows into 2027, then we might change it. On the availability of fuels, it's a very good question. You have the general availability in the market, I think, is relatively okay. There are some places where fuel availability is more challenging, and there are certain ship owners and operators that have more difficulty accessing their fuel because they don't have the same network than we have. As you know, we are partners with TFG on the bunkering side, And definitely on the CMB tech fleet, fuel availability has not been a major issue over the last couple of months. Continuing on to your question on fuel availability in the Middle East, are we expecting big shortages in certain areas? Again, I can say what I just said on the previous question. So far, we think we will find the fuels that are necessary. You never know, of course, what the future will bring. But there's no specific shortage in a specific area where we go. We normally find our fuels.
Okay.
Thank you.
That's all for me for now.
I go back in the queue. Thanks, Christophe.
And the next person is Clement Mullins.
Can you please unmute and ask your question?
Hi, this is Clement Mullins. I'm from Value Investors Edge.
I want to follow up on Frodo's question and your stance on tankers. Should a peace agreement be reached with Iran? What do you think would happen with the dark fleet previously involved in that trade? In other words, to what extent would the scrapping of the dark fleet offset the potential impact from new wheels on your scenarios?
Okay, so I'm going to give you my opinion, which you might agree or disagree with. I don't think the dark fleet will disappear overnight. I think there's 50 shades of grey now. It's not just a dark fleet and a white fleet. There's very different trades going on now, from totally illegal trades to totally legal trades. All the vessels that are active in these trades will, in my humble opinion, continue to find trades even if a peace deal with Iran is achieved. okay that's helpful and we've seen a lot of container ship owners ordering new builds in recent months and but you haven't pulled the trigger could you talk a bit about the reasoning for holding off on additional investments on that space despite the long-term charters attached to most of these new builds very good question um we have not seen an opportunity that's interesting enough for us to move on but we keep on monitoring what is happening okay makes sense
And last one for me. I wanted to ask about the time charter design with Fortescue. Could you talk a bit about the underlying dynamics of the contracts?
Yeah, good question, Clement. And you're not the only one asking. So what we announced, again, there's a lot of confidential items to the deal. But what I can say, it's a framework agreement over 12 ships, which is a combination of ammonia-ready vessels, fully fitted ammonia ships, and ships that we will retrofit at a later stage. And we are working together with Fortescue within this framework as the vessels deliver and come on the water to see on which period we will deploy them at which rates and whether we will use ammonia on board, yes or no. So it's an ongoing process under a framework agreement with Fortescue.
Makes sense. I'll turn it over. Thank you for taking my questions.
Thank you, Clement. and um leading can you please unmute and ask your question yes hello thank you first of all for letting me ask my question i'm a lady married sheets i'm 32 years old i live in belgium and i'm really happy to be investing in cmb tech which is uh quietly uh large-scale business so So my question is very simple. Would there be an impact or negative impact on the numbers when, for example, Iran and the United States come to a peace deal? Thank you.
Well, thank you, Liriem, for dialing in. Very happy that you are an investor in our company. The impact of a peace deal between Iran and U.S. is very difficult to assess because you would have to look at what what does a peace deal mean what are the consequences of a peace deal now one of the consequences that you could see is that the strait of hormuz opens up and that tankers can again freely go in and out of the strait of hormuz now many things can happen then you could see a very positive impact for tanker rates if suddenly china imports a lot more oil to restock their reserves and then they would send a lot of tankers to the Middle East and ship all that oil to China. You could actually also see a negative impact if China does not do that and countries like India, Vietnam, Thailand source their oil from the Middle East because they can go through Hormuz instead of from the Atlantic Basin. The distance the oil will travel to and from is much shorter, which means that you will see less demand for ships. The answer to your question, therefore, lies, there's many different aspects to it, but I think predominantly in what will China do? If there's a peace deal between Iran and U.S., is China going to massively re-import oil and go back to the situation before January 2026, or will they wait and hold off a little bit, in which case i think you could see the market the freight market cool off okay thank you for your response thanks for your question tolber you can now unmute and ask your question please hello tolber steel from the tate i was wondering when we expect a lot of new build ships coming
to the market for swiss marks and and uh vlccs does mean that this is markets which will become less attractive for your uranuf and and that's it's time to scale back operations in in oil tanking markets thanks for your question tobe uh it is clear that uh when all the vessels deliver and if at the same time freight rates go down uranav will make less money than what we are making today.
We are trying to counter that by selling some of our vessels at these rates that we see today and by trying to take some charter cover so that when the market's correct, we still enjoy higher rates. The big issue that we have, Tobe, which I cannot predict, is when will this happen? And as we don't know when it will happen, we want to be prudent and make sure that we have done some part of our homework in taking cover before the market turns okay thank you very much thank you we have also received some questions in the q a so we'll go to those ones now first question what are your expectations for the upcoming imo meeting that's a very good question um Well, let me tell you first what my hope is. I truly hope that the world can come together at the IMO and agree on a clear and simple and certain framework. The uncertainty surrounding a decarbonization framework is not good for the shipping industry, whether you invest in decarbonized solutions like us or where you don't invest in decarbonized solutions. Uncertainty is not good for business. So I'm hoping that there will be clarity at the next meeting. Now, what my expectations are, I have low expectations. I don't think we should be fooled after the United States put a lot of pressure together with some other countries last year to cancel or postpone the deal. I don't think their viewpoint has changed, but we can be surprised to the upside. i do believe there's a big role for china in discussions there's a big role for europe to try to see if they can make a coalition of the willing and push through some legislation so hoping for the best low expectations let's see what happens in november and then we have um two questions on the tanker so i'll ask them together first question if we We compare the spot TCE rate you realize in Q2 on your VLCCs seems to be a bit below compared to other tanker names.
Is it because the routes you have exposure to, or are there any other factors that could explain the difference? Then the second one, how is CMB Tech thinking in regards to the mix between TC and spot exposure?
So on the first question, we had some new building deliveries. We had some positioning voyages, which in the second quarter affected our results a little bit on the split between TCE and spot. It's just a financial exercise. If we can charter out our vessels at good rates, we will do so. If we think being spot will generate more revenue than we will do so as well. We've done both. We have fixed some of our Suez Maxes on period business, whilst we've kept some of our VLCCs on the spot market.
Perfect.
I think this concludes the q and e session thank you very much thank you enya and i would like to thank all the participants to the call for dialing in as we said before if you have any follow-up questions don't hesitate to contact my colleague yuris and he will gladly answer your questions thank you and see you next time
SEC call announcement
Filed Aug 28, 2026 · complete as-filed document