Costco Wholesale Corp DEF 14A, filed Dec 11, 2024
Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)
DEF 14A
2024-12-11
For: 2024-09-01
View Original
Added on
June 12, 2026
About this DEF 14A
Costco Wholesale Corp filed this DEF 14A on December 11, 2024.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
_____________________________
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||||
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as Permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||||
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | ||||
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | ||||
| ☐ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 | ||||
Costco Wholesale Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
| ☒ | No fee required | ||||
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials | ||||
| ☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 | ||||
999 Lake Drive
Issaquah, Washington 98027
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:
The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Costco Wholesale Corporation (the “Company”) will be held by live webcast, on Thursday, January 23, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. Pacific time, to:
1.Elect the nine directors nominated by the Board of Directors to hold office until the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified;
2.Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP ("KPMG") as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2025;
3.Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for fiscal 2024 as disclosed in these materials;
4.Vote on the shareholder proposal described in the accompanying proxy statement, if properly presented at the meeting; and
5.Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
Our 2025 Annual Shareholders' Meeting will be held in a virtual format only, and shareholders can participate from any location with Internet connectivity. We believe this enhances accessibility and reduces the carbon footprint of our activities. Shareholders may view a live webcast of the Annual Meeting and submit questions digitally prior to and during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COST2025. Please refer to the "Participating in the Annual Meeting" section of the Proxy Statement for more details.
Shareholders can vote their shares before the meeting online at www.proxyvote.com, by calling 1-800-690-6903, by mailing a completed proxy card, or by mobile device by scanning the QR code on the proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Shareholders may also vote online during the virtual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COST2025.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2024, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. All shareholders are requested to be present virtually or by proxy. Any shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is voted.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting. We are mailing to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, rather than a full paper set of the materials. The notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials online, as well as instructions on obtaining a paper copy. All shareholders who do not receive such a notice, including shareholders who have previously requested to receive a paper copy, will receive a full set of paper proxy materials by U.S. mail. This process reduces our carbon footprint and our costs to print and distribute materials.
Voting by the Internet or telephone is fast and convenient, and your vote is immediately confirmed and tabulated. If you receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, you may also vote by completing, signing, dating and returning the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed return envelope furnished for that purpose. By using the Internet or telephone you help the Company reduce postage and proxy tabulation costs.
Please do not return the enclosed paper ballot if you are
voting over the Internet or by telephone.
| VOTE BY INTERNET | VOTE BY TELEPHONE | |||||||
http://www.proxyvote.com 24 hours a day/7 days a week | (800) 690-6903 via touch-tone phone toll-free 24 hours a day/7 days a week | |||||||
| Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 22, 2025. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website, and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. | Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 22, 2025. Have your proxy card in hand when you call, and then follow the instructions. | |||||||
You may also vote online during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COST2025
Your cooperation is appreciated, because a majority of the common stock must be represented, either in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business.
| By order of the Board of Directors, | |||||
| John Sullivan | |||||
| Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | |||||
December 11, 2024
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for
the Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on January 23, 2025
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at
https://investor.costco.com.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | |||||
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD
January 23, 2025
SOLICITATION AND REVOCATION OF PROXY
Proxies in the form furnished are solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on January 23, 2025, or any adjournments (the “Annual Meeting”). The individuals named as proxy are Hamilton E. James and Ron M. Vachris. A Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials was first sent to shareholders and the accompanying notice of meeting, this Proxy Statement and the form of proxy are first being made available to shareholders on or about December 11, 2024.
All shares represented by proxies received will be voted in accordance with instructions contained in the proxies. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote:
1.FOR the nine nominees for director named in this Proxy Statement;
2.FOR the ratification of the selection of the Company’s independent auditors;
3.FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for fiscal 2024 as disclosed in these materials; and
4.AGAINST the shareholder proposal.
In the absence of voting instructions to the contrary, shares represented by validly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the foregoing recommendations. A shareholder giving a proxy has the power to revoke it any time before it is voted by providing written notice to the Secretary of the Company, by delivering a later-dated proxy, or by voting virtually at the Annual Meeting.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2024 (the "Record Date") will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 443,960,469 shares of common stock outstanding, which represent all of the voting securities of the Company. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. Shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.
A majority of the common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present either virtually or by proxy, will constitute a quorum. Shareholders who abstain from voting on any or all proposals will be included in the number of shareholders present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be included in the total of votes cast and will not affect the outcome of the vote on proposals 1 through 4.
With respect to proposal 1, the Company’s bylaws provide that in an uncontested election for directors, as at this meeting, a nominee will be elected if the number of votes cast for the nominee's election exceeds the number of votes cast against the nominee's election. An incumbent director nominee who fails to receive the requisite votes for election will not be elected but will continue to serve as a director until the earliest of: (i) 90 days from the date on which the voting results of the election are determined; (ii) the date on which an individual is selected by the Board to fill the position held by such director; or (iii) the date of the
director's resignation. With respect to proposals 2 through 4, to approve each proposal the votes that shareholders cast “for” must exceed the votes cast “against.”
If shares are held by a broker or other financial institution on your behalf (that is, in “street name”), and you do not instruct that firm as to how to vote them, Nasdaq rules allow the firm to vote your shares only on routine matters. Proposal 2, the ratification of the selection of the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2025, is the only matter for consideration at the meeting that Nasdaq rules deem to be routine. For all other proposals, you must submit voting instructions to the firm that holds your shares if you want your vote to count. When a firm votes a client’s shares on some but not all of the proposals, the missing votes are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Please instruct your broker or other financial institution so your vote can be counted.
In addition to mailing the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to shareholders, the Company has asked banks and brokers to forward copies of the notice, and upon request, paper copies of the proxy materials, to persons for whom they hold stock of the Company and to request authority for execution of the proxies. The Company will reimburse banks and brokers for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in doing so. Officers and employees of the Company may, without being additionally compensated, solicit proxies by mail, telephone, email or personal contact. All proxy-soliciting expenses will be paid by the Company in connection with the solicitation of votes for the Annual Meeting. Alliance Advisors may solicit proxies at a cost we anticipate will not exceed $14,500.
Participating in the Annual Meeting
We are conducting a virtual Annual Meeting. Shareholders can participate from any location with Internet connectivity.
•To participate in the Annual Meeting, including to vote and to view the list of registered shareholders as of the record date during the meeting, you must access the meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COST2025 and enter the 16-digit control number found on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on the proxy card or voting instruction form provided to you with this Proxy Statement.
•Whether or not you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. We encourage you to access www.proxyvote.com or call 1-800-690-6903 and vote in advance of the Annual Meeting.
•Shareholders are able to submit questions for the Annual Meeting’s question and answer session before and during the meeting through www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/COST2025. When submitting questions shareholders must identify themselves and provide contact information. We will respond as practical to appropriate questions during the meeting. A recording of the event and responses to unanswered questions (consolidating repetitive questions) will be posted and available after the meeting at https://investor.costco.com. Additional information regarding the rules and procedures for participating in the Annual Meeting will be set forth in our meeting rules of conduct, which shareholders can view during the meeting at the meeting website or during the ten days prior to the meeting at www.proxyvote.com.
•We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting before it begins. Online check-in will be available approximately 15 minutes before the meeting starts. If you have difficulty accessing the meeting, please call 844-986-0822 (toll free) or 303-562-9302 (international).
•Closed captioning will be available for the meeting. For assistance with accommodations please email us at investor@costco.com by January 22, 2025.
Note about Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Proxy Statement, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, statements regarding our environmental and other sustainability plans and goals, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
2
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may appear throughout this Proxy Statement. They generally are identified by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” "likely," “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” or similar expressions and the negatives of those terms. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events, results or performance to differ materially from those indicated by such statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, domestic and international economic conditions, including exchange rates, inflation or deflation, the effects of competition and regulation, uncertainties in the financial markets, consumer and small business spending patterns and debt levels, breaches of security or privacy of member or business information, conditions affecting the acquisition, development, ownership or use of real estate, capital spending, actions of vendors, rising costs associated with employees (generally including health-care costs and wages), workforce interruptions, energy and certain commodities, geopolitical conditions (including tariffs), the ability to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, regulatory and other impacts related to environmental and social matters, public-health related factors, and other risks identified from time to time in the Company’s public statements and reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). A detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included in the section titled “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K and 10-Q. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake to update these statements, except as required by law.
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Directors are elected annually for terms expiring at the next annual meeting of shareholders. In the case of any vacancy on the Board, including a vacancy created by an increase in the number of directors, the vacancy may be filled by the Board for a term continuing until the next election of directors by the shareholders. W. Craig Jelinek and Richard A. Galanti were not nominated by the Board for re-election. The Board has not nominated individuals to fill these vacancies. Each of Susan L. Decker, Kenneth D. Denman, Helena B. Foulkes, Hamilton E. James, Sally Jewell, Jeffrey S. Raikes, John W. Stanton, Ron M. Vachris, and Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter is nominated to serve for a one-year term until the annual meeting of shareholders in 2026 and until a successor is elected and qualified. All nominees are current directors.
Each nominee has indicated a willingness and ability to serve as a director. If any nominee becomes unable or unwilling to serve, the accompanying proxy may be voted for the election of such other person as will be designated by the Board. The proxies being solicited will be voted for no more than nine nominees at the Annual Meeting. Each director will be elected by a majority of the votes cast, virtually or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting, assuming a quorum is present.
The candidates for election have been nominated by the Board based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee. In addition to the information presented below regarding each nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to conclude that he or she should serve as a director, the Board believes that each nominee has demonstrated: outstanding achievement in his or her professional career; relevant experience; personal and professional integrity; ability to make independent, analytical inquiries; experience with and understanding of the business environment; and willingness and ability to devote adequate time to Board duties. We also believe that our directors collectively have the skills and experience that make them well-suited to oversee the Company. They are or have been established leaders in important areas of business, government, and non-profit service. In addition, members of our Board have a great diversity of experiences and bring a wide variety of views that strengthen their ability to guide our Company.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 1.
3
DIRECTORS
The following tables set forth information regarding the nine nominees for election as a director, each to hold office until the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.
| Name | Current Position with the Company | Age | ||||||||||||
| Hamilton E. James | Chairman of the Board of Directors | 73 | ||||||||||||
| Susan L. Decker | Director | 62 | ||||||||||||
| Kenneth D. Denman | Director | 66 | ||||||||||||
| Helena B. Foulkes | Director | 60 | ||||||||||||
| Sally Jewell | Director | 68 | ||||||||||||
| Jeffrey S. Raikes | Director | 66 | ||||||||||||
| John W. Stanton | Director | 69 | ||||||||||||
Ron M. Vachris1 | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | 59 | ||||||||||||
| Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter | Director | 69 | ||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) Mr. Vachris succeeded Mr. Jelinek as Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2024.
BOARD DIVERSITY MATRIX (As of 12/11/2024) | ||||||||||||||
| Female | Male | |||||||||||||
| Part I: Gender Identity | ||||||||||||||
| Directors | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||
| Part II: Demographic Background | ||||||||||||||
| African American or Black | — | 1 | ||||||||||||
| White | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
| INDIVIDUAL BOARD SKILLS MATRIX | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Qualifications, Skills, and Experience | Hamilton E. James | Susan L. Decker | Kenneth D. Denman | Helena B. Foulkes | Sally Jewell | Jeffrey S. Raikes | John W. Stanton | Ron M. Vachris | Maggie Wilderotter | ||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Leadership: Service in senior leadership positions, in government and/or business, including past CEO experience, with expertise in governance, strategy, development, human capital management, and workforce development | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Expertise: Understanding of financial markets, accounting, and/or financial reporting processes | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail Industry Experience: Understanding of operational, financial, and strategic issues facing large retail companies | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technology or E-commerce: Leadership and expertise in technology, e-commerce and digital platforms | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk Management: Governmental public policy, legal and risk management experience and expertise, including data security and/or experience managing cybersecurity and information security risks | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||
Global Operations: Experience at multinational companies or in international markets | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and Brand Management: Experience in consumer marketing, sales or brand management | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4
DIRECTOR BIOGRAPHIES
Set forth below is information with respect to each director of the Company.
Hamilton E. James has been a director of the Company since August 1988. He was the Lead Independent Director from 2005 until becoming the non-executive Chairman of the Board in August 2017. He is chairman of Jefferson River Capital, his family investment firm. He was Executive Vice Chairman of The Blackstone Group, a global alternative asset manager and provider of financial advisory services, until January 31, 2022, and served as its President and Chief Operating Officer from 2002 until 2018. He was also a member of the board of directors of its general partner, Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., until January 31, 2022. Mr. James’s qualifications to serve on the Board include the knowledge and experience he has gained, and contributions he has made, during his tenure as a director of our Company and his broad-ranging experiences in the financial services industry, including senior leadership positions.
Susan L. Decker has been a director of the Company since October 2004. She is Chief Executive Officer and founder of Raftr, Inc., a community experience platform for campuses, founded in 2018. From 2000 to 2009, Ms. Decker served in various executive management roles at Yahoo! Inc., including President from 2007 to 2009 and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2007. She is a director of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Vail Resorts, Inc., and of private corporations Vox Media, Inc., Automattic, Inc. and Chime Financial, Inc. She was previously a director of Intel Corporation, Pixar and Momentive Global Inc. Ms. Decker’s qualifications to serve on the Board include the knowledge and experience she has gained, and contributions she has made, during her tenure as a director of our Company, her service on the boards of other public companies, and her broad-ranging experiences, including senior leadership positions, in the areas of finance, technology and marketing.
Kenneth D. Denman has been a director of the Company since March 2017. He has been a General Partner at Sway Ventures, a venture capital firm, since March 2017. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Emotient, Inc., a developer of software technology to analyze facial expressions, until the company was acquired by Apple in January 2016. Previously, Mr. Denman was the Chief Executive Officer of Openwave Systems, Inc., chairman and CEO of iPass, Inc., and a Senior Vice President and COO for MediaOne. He is a member of the boards of directors of Motorola Solutions, Inc., where he is the lead independent director and chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Previously he was a director at
5
VMware Inc., Mitek Systems Inc., LendingClub Inc., ShoreTel, Inc., and United Online, Inc. Mr. Denman sits on the board of the University of Washington's Foster School of Business, he is the chairman of the University of Washington Foundation Board, and is a member of the Hospital Board of Trustees of Seattle Children's. Mr. Denman’s qualifications to serve on the Board include knowledge and experience from service on the boards of other public companies, and his broad-ranging experiences, including chief executive and other leadership positions, in the areas of technology and international business.
Helena B. Foulkes has been a director of the Company since August 2023. She was CEO and member of the board of directors of Hudson's Bay Company from February 2018 to March 2020. Prior to that, she spent 25 years at CVS Health Corporation, including as President of CVS Pharmacy from January 2014 to January 2018, and Executive Vice President and Chief Health Care Strategy and Marketing Officer from 2011 to 2013. Ms. Foulkes is also a member of the board of directors of Skillsoft Corp. and private companies Follett Higher Education Group, where she serves as Executive Chair, PM Pediatrics Care, and Harry's Inc. She was previously a director of The Home Depot, Inc. Ms. Foulkes recently completed her service as President of Harvard University's Board of Overseers for the 2021-2022 academic year. Ms. Foulkes qualifications to serve on the Board include her substantial experience in retail and as a board member of prominent companies.
Sally Jewell has been a director since January 2020. From June 2019 until May 2020, she served as the interim Chief Executive Officer of The Nature Conservancy, a global environmental non-profit organization, where she continues to serve as a global board member and treasurer. She served as U.S. Secretary of the Interior under President Barack Obama from 2013 to 2017. Prior to her government service, she was CEO of Recreational Equipment Inc., a retailer of outdoor recreation equipment and services, from 2005 to 2013, COO from 2000 to 2005 and a board member from 1996 to 2013. Previously, she worked in commercial banking for 19 years, including in various executive capacities. She serves as chair of the board of Symetra Financial Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sumitomo Life Insurance Company. Mrs. Jewell’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her extensive board service at other public and private corporations and non-profit organizations, and her diverse experience, including serving as chief executive and other leadership positions in government, retail and other businesses, and environmental matters.
Jeffrey S. Raikes has been a director of the Company since December 2008. He is a co-founder of the Raikes Foundation, which invests in youth-serving institutions and systems to make them more effective in supporting young people, especially those that have been most marginalized. Mr. Raikes served as a trustee of Stanford University from 2012 to May 2022, including as board chair from 2017 to 2021. He was the Chief Executive Officer of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation from 2008 to 2014. Mr. Raikes held several positions with Microsoft Corporation from 1981 to 2008, including President of the Business Division from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Raikes' qualifications to serve on the Board are broad-ranging experiences, including senior leadership positions, in the areas of technology, agriculture, marketing, academia, and at one of the world's largest foundations.
John W. Stanton has been a director of the Company since October 2015. He is the Chairman of Trilogy Equity Partners, which invests in wireless-related companies, and Chairman of First Avenue Entertainment LLLP, which is the owner of the Seattle Mariners. Mr. Stanton founded and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a wireless telecommunications company, from 1992 until shortly after its acquisition by ALLTEL Corporation in 2005. He was Chairman and a director of T-Mobile USA, formerly VoiceStream Wireless Corporation, a mobile telecommunications company, from 1994 to 2004, and was Chief Executive Officer from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Stanton was a director of Clearwire Corp. from 2008 to 2013, Chairman between 2011 and 2013, and interim Chief Executive Officer during 2011. He is currently a director of Microsoft Corporation and was previously a director of Trilogy International Partners and Columbia Sportswear Company. Mr. Stanton's qualifications to serve on the Board are his broad-ranging experiences, including senior leadership positions, in the areas of telecommunications and technology, and service on the boards of other companies.
6
Ron M. Vachris has been a director of the Company since February 2022, and Chief Executive Officer and President since January 2024. Mr. Vachris previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2022 to January 2024. He served as Executive Vice President of Merchandising from June 2016 to January 2022, as Senior Vice President of Real Estate Development from August 2015 to June 2016, and Senior Vice President, General Manager of the Northwest Region, from 2010 to July 2015. He spent the previous 28 years in various management positions in warehouse operations. Mr. Vachris’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive knowledge of the Company’s business developed over the course of his long career with the Company, particularly in the areas of operations and merchandising.
Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter has been a director of the Company since October 2015. She served as Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Grand Reserve Inn from December 2016 to June 2023. Mrs. Wilderotter was the Interim CEO of DocuSign, Inc. from June through October 2022. Currently, she is providing senior advisor work for several private equity venture firms. Mrs. Wilderotter was the Executive Chairman of Frontier Communications, a public telecommunications company, from April 2015 until April 2016 and served as Frontier's Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to 2015 and Chair of the Board from December 2005. Prior to joining Frontier, she was a Senior Vice President of Microsoft Corporation from 2002 to 2004. From 1997 to 2002, she was President and Chief Executive Officer of Wink Communications, an interactive telecommunications and media company. Mrs. Wilderotter was previously a director of Xerox Corporation, DreamWorks Animation SKG, Cadence Design Systems, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, The Procter & Gamble Company and Lyft, Inc. She is currently a director of Sana Biotechnology, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., and Chairman of the Board at DocuSign, Inc. and serves on the board of private companies Sonoma Biotherapeutics, Inc. and Tanium, Inc. Her qualifications to serve on the Board include the knowledge and experience she has gained, and contributions she has made, during her service on the boards of over thirty public companies in her career, and her broad-ranging corporate experiences, including senior leadership positions, in the areas of telecommunications, retail, media, healthcare, and technology.
No family relationship exists among any of the directors or executive officers. No arrangement or understanding exists between any director or executive officer and any other person pursuant to which any director was selected as a director or executive officer of the Company.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board has determined that each member of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees meets Nasdaq listing standards regarding independence, including committee independence requirements. Each committee has a written charter, which may be viewed at https://investor.costco.com. Directors currently serving on the Board who are deemed independent are Mmes. Decker, Foulkes, Jewell and Wilderotter and Messrs. Denman, James, Raikes and Stanton, who constitute a majority of the Board (Mr. Munger was also deemed independent while he served on the Board). The non-executive directors of the Company met in executive session presided over by the non-executive Chairman at four meetings in fiscal 2024.
Audit Committee. The functions of the Audit Committee include (among others):
•Providing direct communication between the Board and the Company’s internal and external auditors;
•Monitoring the design and maintenance of the Company’s system of internal accounting controls;
•Selecting, evaluating and, if necessary, replacing the external auditors;
•Reviewing the results of internal and external audits as to the reliability and integrity of financial and operating information;
•Maintaining procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of any complaints received by the Company about its accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
•Reviewing the relationships between the Company and the external auditors to ascertain the independence of the external auditors; and
•Approving compensation of the external auditors.
7
The members of the committee are Mr. Denman (chair) and Mmes. Decker, Foulkes, and Jewell. The Board has determined that all members of the committee are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the rules of the SEC. To ensure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the external auditors. In conjunction with the mandated rotation of the external auditor's lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its chairperson are directly involved in the selection of the new lead engagement partner. The Board and the Audit Committee periodically review with members of management of the Company issues and developments relating to information security, fraud, data security and cybersecurity risk, including controls to monitor and mitigate the related risks. The Audit Committee met nine times during fiscal 2024. A report of the Audit Committee is set forth below.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews the salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation provided to executive officers of the Company and oversees the overall administration of the Company’s compensation and stock-based compensation programs. The committee has authority to administer the Company's policies with respect to the recovery or "clawback" of compensation granted, awarded or paid to the CEO, senior executives or other employees of the Company. Except with respect to setting the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, the committee may delegate its authority to a subcommittee of the committee (consisting either of a subset of members of the committee or any members of the Board who would be eligible to serve on the committee). In addition, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the committee may delegate to one or more executive officers of the Company the authority to grant stock awards to employees who are not executive officers or members of the Board. The committee has delegated certain authority to the Chief Executive Officer with respect to such awards not involving executive officers. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis below for a further description of the role of the committee. The members of the committee, which met five times during fiscal 2024, are Mr. Stanton (chair) and Mmes. Jewell and Wilderotter. A report of the Compensation Committee is set forth below.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The functions of the Nominating and Governance Committee are to identify and approve individuals qualified to serve as members of the Board, select director nominees for the annual meeting of shareholders, evaluate the Board’s performance, develop and recommend to the Board corporate governance guidelines, and provide oversight with respect to corporate governance, ethical conduct and environmental and sustainability policies and initiatives. The committee is authorized by its charter to engage its own advisors. The Board is responsible for nominating members for election to the Board and for filling vacancies on the Board that may occur between annual meetings of shareholders. The committee is responsible for identifying, screening and recommending to the Board candidates for Board membership. The committee approved the nomination of the candidates reflected in proposal 1. When formulating its recommendations, the committee will also consider advice and recommendations from others as it deems appropriate. The members of the committee, which met five times in fiscal 2024, are Mr. Raikes (chair) and Mmes. Foulkes and Wilderotter.
The committee will consider shareholder recommendations for candidates to serve on the Board. In accordance with section 2.1 of our bylaws, which may be viewed at https://investor.costco.com, the name of any recommended candidate, together with pertinent biographical information, a document indicating the candidate’s willingness to serve if elected, and evidence of the nominating shareholder’s ownership of Company stock should be sent to the Secretary of the Company. The Company may require additional information, as described in our bylaws. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that nominees for director will be selected on the basis of, among other things, knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, integrity, diversity, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, and understanding of the Company’s business environment, all in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at the time. Nominees should also be willing to devote adequate time and effort to Board responsibilities. The Nominating and Governance Committee does not set specific, minimum qualifications that nominees must meet in order for the committee to recommend them to the Board, but rather believes that each nominee should be evaluated based on individual merit, taking into account the needs of the Company and the composition of the Board.
8
We believe that the Company benefits from having directors with a diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, and experiences. Currently, of the nine directors on the Board, four are women and one is African American. In addition, as discussed above, our directors bring a diversity of viewpoints and experiences as established leaders in important areas of business, government and non-profit service that we believe strengthens the Board’s ability to guide our Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees a self-assessment of the Board’s or its committees performance every year. The assessment seeks to identify specific areas, if any, in need of improvement or strengthening, including with respect to the diversity of our Board in terms of viewpoints, backgrounds and experiences. Since 2014, the Board, led by the Nominating and Governance Committee, has been engaged in a process to refresh its membership; five new independent directors have been added and, as of the 2025 Annual Meeting, ten members have ceased to serve.
Our bylaws provide for proxy access shareholder nominations for director candidates by eligible shareholders. Shareholder nominations require compliance with section 2.1 of the bylaws. A shareholder who wishes to formally nominate a candidate, whether for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement or not, must follow the procedures described in our bylaws (which includes information required under SEC Rule 14a-19). There is otherwise no formal process prescribed for identifying and evaluating nominees, except as described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which may be viewed at https://investor.costco.com.
Board Structure. The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board does not require the separation of the offices of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer and shall be free to choose its Chairman in any way that it deems best for the Company at any given point in time. Currently the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are filled separately. Our Chief Executive Officer has primary responsibility for the operational leadership and strategic direction of the Company, while our non-executive Chairman facilitates our Board’s independent oversight of management, promotes communication between management and the Board, and leads the Board’s consideration of key governance matters. The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Company at this time.
The Role of the Board in Risk Oversight. The Board seeks to ensure that management has processes for dealing appropriately with risk. It is the responsibility of the Company’s senior management to develop and implement the Company’s short- and long-term objectives and to identify, evaluate, manage and mitigate the risks inherent in seeking to achieve those objectives. Management is responsible for identifying risk and risk controls related to significant business activities and Company objectives, and developing programs to determine the sufficiency of risk identification, the balance of potential risk to potential reward, the appropriate manner in which to control risk, and the support of the risk-controlling behavior and the risk to Company strategy.
The Board implements its risk oversight responsibilities primarily through the Audit Committee, which receives management reports on the potentially significant risks, including (without limitation) cybersecurity matters, that the Company faces and how the Company is seeking to control risk where appropriate. The committee also oversees internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee reports to the full board on its risk-management tasks, including the enterprise risk management review. In more limited cases, such as with risks of significant new business concepts and substantial entry into new markets, risk oversight is addressed as part of the full Board’s engagement with the Chief Executive Officer and management. Board members also often discuss risk as a part of their review of the ongoing business, financial, and other activities of the Company. The Board also has overall responsibility for executive-officer succession planning. The Nominating and Governance Committee also exercises oversight regarding risks associated with corporate governance matters and certain issues relating to the Company’s ethics, environmental, social and governance (ESG), and compliance programs.
9
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
For fiscal 2024, each non-employee director earned $37,000 for serving on the Board. Each non-employee director also received a grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), with a target value of $270,000. Based on the closing share price at the time of grant, October 22, 2023, each director received 489 restricted stock units. The number of shares subsequently was adjusted in connection with the special dividend paid in January 2024. RSUs vest one-third annually, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and are subject to accelerated vesting upon the director’s retirement: 50% and 100% with five and ten years of service, respectively. Stock ownership requirements mandate that within five years of joining the Board a non-executive board member shall own and retain shares of Company common stock worth at least $1 million based on the value at the time of acquisition. All non-executive board members are in compliance. Board members receive a free Costco executive membership and are reimbursed for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties.
FISCAL 2024 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes compensation for the non-employee directors of the Company for fiscal 2024.
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)1 | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| Hamilton E. James | 37,000 | 265,999 | 302,999 | |||||||||||||||||
| Susan L. Decker | 37,000 | 265,999 | 302,999 | |||||||||||||||||
| Kenneth D. Denman | 37,000 | 265,999 | 302,999 | |||||||||||||||||
Helena B. Foulkes2 | 41,675 | 265,999 | 307,674 | |||||||||||||||||
| Sally Jewell | 37,000 | 265,999 | 302,999 | |||||||||||||||||
| Charles T. Munger | 37,000 | 265,999 | 302,999 | |||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey S. Raikes | 37,000 | 265,999 | 302,999 | |||||||||||||||||
| John W. Stanton | 37,000 | 265,999 | 302,999 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter | 37,000 | 265,999 | 302,999 | |||||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) Represents the grant-date fair value, adjusted for the effects of the special dividend, of the RSUs granted in October 2023. The value is calculated as the market value of the common stock on the grant date less the present value of the expected dividends forgone during the vesting period. These amounts thus do not reflect the amount of compensation actually received during the fiscal year. For a description of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity awards, see Note 1 of our financial statements in our Form 10-K for the year ended September 1, 2024.
(2) Ms. Foulkes was elected in August 2023 and received a pro-rated quarterly fee during fiscal 2024 for services in fiscal 2023.
At the end of fiscal 2024, non-employee directors held the following outstanding equity awards and shares:
| Name | Restricted Stock Units | Shares Owned | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Hamilton E. James | 1,071 | 55,029 | 56,100 | |||||||||||||||||
| Susan L. Decker | 1,071 | 10,704 | 11,775 | |||||||||||||||||
| Kenneth D. Denman | 1,071 | 4,849 | 5,920 | |||||||||||||||||
| Helena B. Foulkes | 498 | 39 | 537 | |||||||||||||||||
| Sally Jewell | 1,071 | 1,953 | 3,024 | |||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey S. Raikes | 1,071 | 29,410 | 30,481 | |||||||||||||||||
| John W. Stanton | 1,071 | 22,852 | 23,923 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter | 1,071 | 11,297 | 12,368 | |||||||||||||||||
10
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD
Shareholders may contact an individual director, the Board as a group, or a specified Board committee or group, including the non-employee directors as a group, at the following address: Corporate Secretary, Costco Wholesale Corporation, 999 Lake Drive, Issaquah, WA 98027 Attn: Board of Directors. The Company will receive and process communications before forwarding them to the addressee. Directors generally will not be forwarded shareholder communications that are primarily commercial in nature, relate to improper or irrelevant topics, or request general information about the Company.
Meeting Attendance
During the Company’s last fiscal year, the Board met four times. Each member of the Board attended all of the Board meetings. Each member of the Board attended all meetings of the committees on which he or she served. As set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are encouraged to attend meetings of shareholders. All directors attended the meeting in 2024.
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding ownership of the common stock by each person or group known to the Company to own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the common stock on November 15, 2024.
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Shares | Percent1 | ||||||||||||
| Vanguard Group, Inc. | 41,746,567(2) | 9.40% | ||||||||||||
| 100 Vanguard Blvd., | ||||||||||||||
| Malvern, PA 19355 | ||||||||||||||
| BlackRock, Inc. | 33,555,577(3) | 7.56% | ||||||||||||
| 50 Hudson Yards | ||||||||||||||
| New York, NY 10001 | ||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) Based on 443,960,469 shares of common stock outstanding. In accordance with SEC rules, percent of class as of this date is calculated for each person and group by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by the sum of the total shares outstanding plus the number of shares subject to securities exercisable by that person or group within 60 days.
(2) Information based on Form 13F-HR filed with the SEC by Vanguard Group, Inc. on November 13, 2024.
(3) Information based on Form 13F-HR filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. on November 13, 2024.
11
The following table sets forth the shares of the common stock owned on November 15, 2024 by each director, each nominee for election as a director, the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, and all directors and executive officers as a group.
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Shares Beneficially Owned1 | Percent of Class2 | ||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | 44,677 | * | ||||||||||||
| W. Craig Jelinek | 356,409(3) | * | ||||||||||||
| Susan L. Decker | 12,078 | * | ||||||||||||
| Kenneth D. Denman | 6,223 | * | ||||||||||||
| Helena B. Foulkes | 840(4) | * | ||||||||||||
| Richard A. Galanti | 35,126(5) | * | ||||||||||||
| Hamilton E. James | 56,403(6) | * | ||||||||||||
| Sally Jewell | 3,327 | * | ||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | 10,203(7) | * | ||||||||||||
| Gary Millerchip | 13,412 | * | ||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | 9,746 | * | ||||||||||||
| Jeffrey S. Raikes | 30,784 | * | ||||||||||||
| Pierre Riel | 10,210 | * | ||||||||||||
| John W. Stanton | 24,226(8) | * | ||||||||||||
| Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter | 12,671 | * | ||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (22 persons) | 810,849 | * | ||||||||||||
_______________________
*Less than 1%.
(1) Includes RSUs outstanding.
(2) Based on 443,960,469 shares of common stock outstanding, and 2,331,019 RSUs outstanding. In accordance with SEC rules, percent of class as of this date is calculated for each person and group by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by the sum of the total shares outstanding plus the number of shares subject to securities that will vest within 60 days.
(3) Includes 150,027 shares held by grantor annuity trusts, of which Mr. Jelinek is the sole grantor, trustee, and annuity beneficiary.
(4) Includes 39 shares held by trusts of which Ms. Foulkes or her spouse is a trustee.
(5) Includes 7,000 shares owned by a limited liability company, of which Mr. Galanti is the manager. Mr. Galanti disclaims ownership of these shares. Also includes 726 shares owned by Mr. Galanti's spouse.
(6) Includes 1,151 shares held by trusts of which Mr. James is a trustee.
(7) Includes 10,202 shares held by a trust of which Mr. Miller is a trustee.
(8) Includes 422 shares held by a trust of which Mr. Stanton is a trustee. Mr. Stanton disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
(at Fiscal Year-End)
Plan category1 | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights2 | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($)3 | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (1))4 | |||||||||||||||||
Total equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 2,799,016 | — | 7,277,767 | |||||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) There are no plans besides those approved by security holders.
(2) Shares of common stock issuable upon vesting and release of outstanding RSUs granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan.
(3) There were no options, warrants, or rights outstanding at September 1, 2024.
(4) Available for issuance under the 2019 Incentive Plan, assuming issuance as RSUs. Includes the effect of adjustments made for special dividends.
12
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Following is a discussion and analysis of our compensation programs as they apply to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated individuals who served as executive officers in fiscal 2024 and our former Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers. These individuals are referred to as the “Named Executive Officers" and include: Ron M. Vachris, Chief Executive Officer; W. Craig Jelinek, former Chief Executive Officer; Gary Millerchip, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; Richard A. Galanti, Executive Vice President and former Chief Financial Officer; Russ D. Miller, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer - Warehouse Operations, U.S. and Mexico; Pierre Riel, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer - International Division; and Javier Polit, Executive Vice President, Chief Information and Digital Officer.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our compensation programs are designed to motivate our executives and employees and enable them to participate in the growth of our business. The Company believes it has been very successful in attracting and retaining quality employees, generally achieving low turnover in our executive, staff and warehouse management ranks. In addition, in the judgment of the Compensation Committee, the programs have contributed to the financial and competitive success of the Company. Accordingly, the Committee believes it is desirable to continue these programs.
At the 2024 Annual Meeting, the advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation was 94.55% in favor. The Committee did not determine to make any changes to the compensation programs as a result of the vote. Compensation levels approved by the Committee for the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2024 did not materially change from those approved for the prior year, except for the changes associated with the Chief Executive Officer transition and the hiring of the two new executive officers, as described below under "2024 Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer" and "2024 Compensation of Other Named Executive Officers." Discussions by certain directors and management with a number of shareholders since the 2024 Annual Meeting have not revealed significant concerns about the structure or operation of the Company's compensation programs.
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Committee determines the amounts and elements of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer. For other executive officers, it reviews the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer, with which it generally agrees. The Committee’s function is more fully described under “Committees of the Board — Compensation Committee.”
During fiscal 2024, the Committee consisted of Mr. Stanton (chair), and Mmes. Jewell and Wilderotter. The Committee has authority under its charter to engage compensation consultants but did not use any. The Committee’s primary activity occurs in the fall, following the close of the fiscal year, when the Committee: (i) approves grants of RSUs, including performance targets for RSUs granted to executive officers for the current fiscal year; (ii) determines whether performance targets have been satisfied for RSUs granted during the prior fiscal year; (iii) approves total compensation levels for executive officers for the fiscal year just concluded, including any salary increases and cash bonuses; and (iv) approves the executive officer cash-bonus program for the current fiscal year. The bonuses concerning environmental and social progress are overseen jointly with the Nominating and Governance Committee.
Elements of Compensation
The components of our executive compensation programs are equity compensation (consisting generally of performance-based RSUs), base salary, cash bonuses, and other benefits (primarily consisting of health plans, a 401(k) plan and a deferred compensation plan). The Committee believes that these components are appropriate and are consistent with the Company’s long-standing approach to executive compensation, which has made equity awards the most significant form of compensation. The Committee did not reevaluate this year whether there is an optimal mix of equity, salary, bonus and other compensation
13
components for each executive officer. Rather, it relied upon the fact that the current structure has been utilized successfully in years past and gave more particular attention to the incremental changes in the components of the mix and the value of the total compensation packages.
RSUs. RSU grants represent the largest component of compensation, based on their fair value at the time of grant. The Committee believes that emphasizing this form of compensation helps align the interests of employee-grantees with those of shareholders, both in the shorter term (with one-year performance conditions) and in the longer term (with share ownership requirements and time-based vesting of up to five years, subject to earlier vesting for long service, as described below). All named executive officers received performance-based RSU grants for fiscal 2024, except for Mr. Jelinek, who received time-based RSUs. Messrs. Millerchip and Polit also received time-based RSUs in consideration of compensation, including equity awards, from their previous employers that were forfeited as a result of resigning their former positions.
Base salary. Base salary is the second largest compensation component. It is consistent with the need for executive officers to have predictable cash compensation, which has been subject generally to modest annual increases.
Cash bonus. Cash bonuses are based on a variety of metrics. They address short-term incentives and are linked to performance during the fiscal year. Historically, at least some portion of the cash bonuses has been paid each year. The Committee believes that maintaining cash bonuses in the current proportion is consistent with preferring long-term equity incentives as being in the greater interest of the Company and its shareholders. Over 7,000 employees were eligible for cash bonuses for fiscal 2024. To be eligible for the annual bonus, the individual must be employed by the Company at the time the bonuses are paid (historically in November).
Other elements. Consistent with its position as a low-overhead operator, the Company has modest “other compensation.” Significant components of this compensation include health care and helping executives fund their retirement needs (through the 401(k) and the deferred compensation plans); the Company provides no pensions.
These components of compensation mix incentives that are intended to reward shorter-term (twelve months) and longer-term performance (five years and beyond). Shorter-term incentives come primarily from the initial award of RSUs being subject to achievement of a one-year performance metric and, to a significantly lesser extent, cash bonuses that are subject to one-year performance metrics. Longer-term incentives come primarily from the RSU award vesting of up to five years, and, to a lesser extent, share ownership requirements for executive officers and vesting elements in certain benefit plans (such as the deferred compensation and 401(k) plan matches).
The Committee believes that these elements do not promote unreasonable risk-taking behavior. The value of shorter-term incentives (including cash bonus awards and performance conditions for awards of RSUs) is substantially exceeded by longer-term incentives (including equity awards that vest over up to five years) and share ownership requirements, which the Committee believes reward sustained performance that is aligned with shareholder interests. In addition, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Rule 10D-1 Policy on Recovery of Incentive Compensation (described more fully below) require or enable the Committee to seek the return of incentive compensation improperly earned, depending on the circumstances.
Peer Companies
For fiscal 2024, the Committee primarily considered executive compensation data obtained from proxy statements for the following peer companies: Walmart Inc., The Home Depot, Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc., The TJX Companies, Inc., Target Corporation, The Kroger Company, Best Buy Inc., BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, Ross Stores Inc., and Wesfarmers Ltd. The peer companies were selected because they are recognized as successful retailers and two of them operate membership clubs. PriceSmart, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Carrefour SA were removed from last year's list and CVS Health Corporation and Ross Stores, Inc. were added due to their capitalization and other elements of comparability. The Committee took into account that the current market capitalization of one of the companies is substantially larger than the Company. The Committee did not use the comparable company data to set
14
mid-points or other specific quantitative comparisons of executive compensation; it used them only for general reference.
Equity Compensation
If fully earned based upon the achievement of performance targets and fully vested, equity compensation is the largest component of compensation for executive officers. RSU grants to executive officers are generally performance-based (with the exceptions noted above for certain time-based grants to Messrs. Jelinek, Millerchip and Polit), with performance-vesting over a one-year period, time-vesting over up to five years, and vesting for long service. Following satisfaction of performance targets, RSUs become time-vested RSUs that, subject to accelerated vesting for long service (described below) vest 20% upon the first anniversary of the grant date (following the determination by the Committee that the performance criteria have been satisfied) and 20% vest over each of the ensuing four years. (Vesting of RSUs awarded to non-executive officers and employees is not performance-based.) To the extent accelerated or time-vesting requirements are met, RSUs are settled and paid in shares of common stock (net of shares withheld for taxes). Recipients are not entitled to vote or receive dividends on unvested and undelivered RSUs.
Except as noted below, all officers and employees who receive RSU grants receive accelerated vesting once they have achieved long service with the Company (33% vesting credited on the first anniversary of the date of grant after 25 years of service, 66% vesting after 30 years of service, and 100% vesting after 35 years of service, with any remainder vesting ratably over the remaining vesting period). This accelerated vesting, following satisfaction of the performance conditions as to executive officers, entitles individuals to receive shares within ten business days of the anniversary of the grant date or of the initial grant date if the years of service requirement has been met prior to the grant date. All grants in fiscal 2024 prior to January 2024 were adjusted for the 2024 special dividend as provided for in the plan.
Mr. Jelinek's awards and Mr. Vachris's fiscal 2024 awards are not subject to accelerated vesting prior to termination for long service and instead vest under the five-year vesting schedule. Mr. Millerchip's time-based RSU awards vest 33% over each of the ensuing three years from the grant date. Mr. Polit's time-based RSU awards vested one-fifth on October 22, 2024, and will vest one-fifth on October 22, in each of the ensuing four years. The performance-based awards granted to Mr. Millerchip and Mr. Polit in fiscal 2024 vested one-fifth on October 22, 2024 and will vest one-fifth on October 22, in each of the ensuing four years. For awards vested on October 22, 2023, all other Named Executive Officers received 100% long-service vesting.
The criteria for the fiscal 2024 performance-based grants were (versus fiscal 2023) a 3% increase in net sales or a 7% increase in pre-tax income (both adjusted for changes in foreign currencies and normalized for one less week in fiscal 2024). The Committee determined that both goals were exceeded. Accordingly, the executive officers who received performance-based grants earned all of the RSUs granted, subject to time-based and long-service vesting. All recipients, other than Messrs. Vachris, Millerchip and Polit received accelerated vesting for long service for these RSUs.
The Board adopted in July 2008 a fixed date of October 22 for RSU grants, with exceptions as approved in advance by the Committee. For fiscal 2024, RSU grants were made on October 22, 2023 (with the exception of Mr. Polit, who received his grant in December 2023, and Mr. Millerchip who received his grant in March 2024, each when they joined the Company), and the performance criteria for the grants were established in November 2023. All grants in fiscal 2024 were made under the Company’s 2019 Incentive Plan, approved by the shareholders in January 2019.
Other Compensation
The Company provides the Named Executive Officers with benefits of a type offered to all other U.S. employees in most respects. The value of these benefits constitutes a small percentage of each executive’s total compensation. Key benefits include paid vacation, premiums for long-term disability insurance, a matching contribution and a discretionary 401(k) plan contribution, and basic life insurance. In addition, the Company maintains a non-qualified deferred-compensation plan for the benefit of over 1,000 employees, including the Named Executive Officers. The plan provides that the first $10,000 of an employee’s
15
contributions may be matched 50% by the Company, subject to certain limitations. This match vests over time. The Company does not maintain a pension plan or post-retirement medical plan for any employee. There are Company matching contributions, which are capped, for charitable contributions by many employees, including the Named Executive Officers. The Committee believes the benefits are modest and consistent with its overall objective of attracting and retaining highly-qualified executive officers.
2024 Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer
In addition to considering the Company’s compensation policies generally, the Committee reviews executive compensation and concentrates on the compensation packages for the Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Jelinek served as Chief Executive Officer through December 31, 2023, at a salary of $1,150,000. For fiscal 2024, the Committee granted Mr. Jelinek 27,129 time-based RSUs, which was the same dollar value as the prior year. All of Mr. Jelinek's outstanding RSUs vested upon his retirement as an employee in April 2024. Mr. Jelinek requested that he not receive a bonus for fiscal 2024.
Mr. Vachris has served as Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 2024. Near the end of calendar 2023, the Committee approved a written employment contract with Mr. Vachris, related to service during calendar 2024, providing for a salary of $1,150,000. Separately, the Committee approved the RSU award and target cash bonus described below.
For fiscal 2024, the Committee granted Mr. Vachris 18,809 performance-based RSUs, which represented an increase of 49% over the prior year, due to his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer. The Committee determined after the end of the fiscal year that the performance criteria were exceeded, and all of the performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Vachris were earned.
For fiscal 2024, the bonus amount for Mr. Vachris reflects a blended base for his time served as President until December 31, 2023, and as President and Chief Executive Officer starting January 1, 2024. The bonus was determined by the Committee in November 2023: (i) $220,000 of bonus eligibility was determined by the Company's attainment of its pre-tax income goal, which was exceeded in fiscal 2024 (the goal was $9.6 billion, on a generally accepted accounting principles basis; actual pre-tax income, adjusted for changes in foreign currencies based on budgeted rates, as provided for in the plan, was $9.8 billion); (ii) $220,000 of bonus eligibility was determined based on net sales (the goal was $253.8 billion; actual net sales, adjusted for changes in foreign currencies based on budgeted rates, as provided for in the plan, were $250.4 billion, achieving 98.7% of the target); and (iii) $93,333 of bonus eligibility was determined by environmental and social objectives for achievement of quantitative performance metrics (including metrics concerning diversity, equity and inclusion, resource consumption, and other environmental-related areas). The potential payment attributable to the first two performance measures was from zero to up to 120%, based on the level of achievement. The potential payment attributable to the third performance measure was all or nothing, depending on whether a majority of the quantitative metrics was achieved. For fiscal 2024, the pre-tax income component of the bonus earned was $231,000, based on the Company's achieving 102% of the pre-tax profit target. The sales component of the bonus was $110,000, based on the Company's achieving 98.7% of the sales target. The quantitative environmental and social targets were met, entitling Mr. Vachris to $93,333.
Apart from the change-in-control provision in the Company’s equity plan applicable to all grantees and in the deferred compensation plan applicable to all participants (described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control”), none of Messrs. Jelinek, Vachris, or any other employee has or had any change-in-control arrangement with the Company.
2024 Compensation of Other Named Executive Officers
The most significant component of compensation in fiscal 2024 was performance-based RSUs. Performance-based RSU amounts awarded to Messrs. Galanti, Millerchip, Miller, Riel, and Polit were 9,315, 3,922, 7,302, 7,302, and 6,618. Messrs. Millerchip and Polit also received time-based RSUs in the amount of 9,803 and 3,618 as part of signing on with the Company. Performance-based RSU levels increased 3% for Messrs. Galanti and Miller and 14% for Mr. Riel over the prior year, based on the closing share price at the
16
time of the grant. The amounts awarded were based on the recommendations of Mr. Jelinek (Mr. Vachris in the case of Mr. Millerchip's awards) and approved by the Committee before the grants. The performance criteria were, as noted above, exceeded, and the Named Executive Officers earned all of the RSUs granted, with accelerated-vesting for long service and further time-based vesting.
Salaries for other Named Executive Officers, except for Messrs. Millerchip and Polit, were based upon the recommendation of Mr. Jelinek, who focused on the amount of increase deserved over the prior year’s salary level. Base salary levels for these officers increased between 2% and 4% over the previous fiscal year. Salaries for Messrs. Millerchip and Polit were based on agreements reached for them in connection with their joining the Company.
Other Named Executive Officers received cash bonuses of $164,000, with Messrs. Millerchip and Polit receiving a pro rata portion based on their term of service as an executive officer during the year and sign-on bonuses of $4 million and $3.1 million, respectively. The potential bonus amount was $232,000, which did not change from last year. This amount included $80,000 based on the achievement of targets relating to net sales and $80,000 based on the achievement of targets relating to pre-tax income. The potential payment attributable to each of these performance goals was from zero up to 120% of the award target amount, based on the level of achievement. Up to $40,000 in potential related to environmental and social objectives: $24,000 relating to achievement of quantitative performance metrics (including metrics concerning diversity, equity and inclusion, resource consumption, and other environmental-related areas) on an all or nothing basis depending upon whether a majority of the quantitative metrics were satisfied; and up to $16,000 based on discretionary assessment by the Chief Executive Officer of the officer's environmental and social achievements (including, without limitation, progress in controlling emissions). For fiscal 2024, the pre-tax income component of the bonus earned was $84,000, based on the Company's achieving 102% of the pre-tax profit target. The net sales component of the bonus earned was $40,000, based on the Company's achieving 98.7% of the net sales target. The environmental and social objective bonus was fully earned, which included the achievement of quantitative performance metrics and 100% of the discretionary amount, as recommended by Mr. Vachris.
Clawback Policy
The Compensation Committee adopted a Rule 10D-1 Policy on Recovery of Incentive Compensation, effective October 2, 2023, in accordance with Rule 10D-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Nasdaq listing standards. The Rule 10D-1 Policy applies to current and former executive officers of the Company as defined in Rule 10D-1, including the Named Executive Officers, and will be administered by the Compensation Committee. In the event the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement to correct material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. federal securities laws, including restatements that correct an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements or that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period, it is the Company's policy to recover erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation received by its executive officers. The recovery of such compensation applies regardless of whether an executive officer engaged in misconduct or otherwise cause or contributed to the requirement for a restatement.
In addition, under the clawback policy in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which applies to the extent not superseded by the Rule 10D-1 Policy, the Company will seek to recover, at the direction of the Committee after it has considered the costs and benefits, incentive compensation (including, without limitation, any bonus, incentive payment, and equity award) awarded or paid to an officer for a fiscal period if the result of a performance measure upon which the award was based or paid is subsequently restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of the award or payment. Where the incentive compensation is not awarded or paid on a formulaic basis, the Committee may determine in its discretion the amount, if any, by which the payment or award should be reduced. In addition, if an officer engaged in intentional misconduct (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion) that contributed to the award or payment of incentive compensation to the officer that is greater than would have been paid or awarded in the absence of the misconduct, the Company may take other remedial and recovery action, as determined by the Committee.
17
Stock Ownership Requirements
Executive officers are required by the end of each calendar year to own and retain shares of Company common stock representing in value at least three times (seven times for the Chief Executive Officer) the base salary of the officer in effect at the beginning of the fiscal year. Newly-promoted officers have twenty-four months to achieve compliance. The Nominating and Governance Committee may authorize an extension should the timing present an undue burden. All executive officers were in compliance at the end of calendar 2023.
Hedging and Pledging Policies
The Corporate Governance Guidelines prohibit transactions involving hedging of the Company's equity securities by directors, officers, and employees and prohibit pledging of the Company's equity securities by directors and executive officers. The prohibition on transactions involving hedging includes any instrument or transaction, including put options and forward-sale contracts, through which an individual offsets or reduces exposure to the risk of price fluctuations in a corresponding equity security. Equity securities include common stock, voting preferred stock and options and other securities exercisable for, or convertible into, settled in, or measured by reference to, any other equity security determined on an as-exercised and as-converted basis. The equity securities attributable to a director or executive officer for these purposes are those attributable under either Section 13 or Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All directors and executive officers are in compliance with this policy.
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures
The Company has an Insider Trading Policy governing the purchase, sale and other dispositions of our securities by directors, officers and employees that is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and listing standards. A copy of the policy was filed as Exhibit 19.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 1, 2024.
Conclusion
The Committee believes that each element of compensation and the total compensation provided to each of the Named Executive Officers is reasonable and appropriate. The compensation of the Named Executive Officers is significantly tied to the Company’s performance and the return to shareholders. The Committee believes that its compensation programs will allow the Company to continue to attract and retain a top-performing management team.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors has submitted the following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement:
The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement. Based on the review and discussions with management, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 1, 2024, for filing with the SEC.
John W. Stanton, Chair
Sally Jewell
Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter
18
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation for the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022.
_______________________
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)1 | Bonus ($)2 | Stock Awards ($)3 | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)4 | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)5 | All Other Compensation ($)6 | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | 2024 | 1,078,077 | — | 10,592,029 | 434,333 | 69,138 | 56,164 | 12,229,741 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | 2023 | 937,500 | — | 7,151,883 | 248,000 | 62,801 | 52,658 | 8,452,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 993,308 | 15,483 | 6,066,880 | 232,246 | 27,042 | 73,685 | 7,408,644 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
W. Craig Jelinek7 | 2024 | 838,173 | — | 14,620,472 | — | 422,661 | 168,564 | 16,049,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Former Chief Executive Officer | 2023 | 1,154,808 | — | 14,937,824 | 362,500 | 360,133 | 55,358 | 16,870,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 1,230,769 | — | 7,915,928 | 500,000 | 159,954 | 98,419 | 9,905,070 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary Millerchip8 | 2024 | 456,923 | 4,008,615 | 9,651,671 | 79,693 | — | 82,542 | 14,279,444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard A. Galanti9 | 2024 | 916,615 | 16,000 | 5,374,408 | 148,000 | 703,348 | 55,334 | 7,213,705 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, Former Chief Financial Officer | 2023 | 919,231 | 16,000 | 5,108,767 | 108,000 | 612,858 | 51,543 | 6,816,399 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 850,000 | 13,600 | 4,394,735 | 204,000 | 282,168 | 72,730 | 5,817,233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | 2024 | 743,231 | 16,000 | 4,212,982 | 148,000 | 32,763 | 61,862 | 5,214,838 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Executive Vice President, COO - U.S. and Mexico Operations | 2023 | 728,135 | 16,000 | 4,004,156 | 108,000 | 32,752 | 59,403 | 4,948,446 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 698,366 | 13,600 | 3,976,572 | 204,000 | 14,890 | 97,013 | 5,004,441 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pierre Riel10 Executive Vice President, COO - International Division | 2024 | 680,250 | 16,000 | 4,212,982 | 148,000 | — | 331,811 | 5,389,043 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, COO - International Division | 2023 | 679,258 | 16,000 | 3,629,438 | 108,000 | — | 616,169 | 5,048,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | 2024 | 370,000 | 3,112,308 | 6,140,740 | 113,846 | — | 75,965 | 9,812,859 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, Chief Information and Digital Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Salaries in 2023 reflect the additional week in that year with certain salaries restated to reflect retroactive pay when earned rather than received. Salaries in 2022 include required vacation payout.
(2) Awarded under the Company’s cash bonus program based on a discretionary assessment by the Chief Executive Officer of the executive officer's environmental and social accomplishments. Messrs. Millerchip and Polit bonus also includes a sign-on bonus of $4M and $3.1M, respectively, when they joined the Company.
(3) The award value represents the grant-date fair value of performance-based and time-based RSUs granted to the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022. Performance-based RSUs were earned upon attainment of performance criteria and subject to additional time-based vesting. The performance criteria for fiscal 2024 are described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Equity Compensation.” The value of both type of awards are calculated as the market value of the common stock on the measurement date less the present value of the expected dividends forgone during the vesting period. For a description of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of RSUs, see Note 1 of our financial statements in our Form 10-K for the year ended September 1, 2024. The measurement date for performance-based RSUs are the date that the Compensation Committee establishes the performance conditions, near the end of the first fiscal quarter. The measurement date for time-based RSUs is the date that the CEO approves the grants. These amounts thus do not reflect the amount of compensation actually received by the Named Executive Officer during the fiscal year.
(4) Awarded under the Company's cash bonus program for fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022.
(5) Each Named Executive Officer (among certain other employees) is eligible to participate in the Company’s non-qualified deferred-compensation plan, which allows the employee to defer up to 80% of salary and 90% of bonus and to receive a Company match of 50% of the deferred amount, up to a maximum annual match of $5,000. The minimum deferral period is five years, unless a participant elects to receive distributions upon separation from service. The matching contribution vests ratably over five years, unless the participant has attained a sum of age and years of service totaling 65, in which case the Company match vests immediately when credited to the executive's account. Interest accrues on deferred amounts at the Bank of America prime rate. An additional 1% interest is credited upon the participant’s attaining a sum of age and years of service totaling 65. The amounts reported in this column represent the interest on the officer’s balance to the extent that it is “above market” – greater than 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate.
(6) Detail is provided below in the All Other Compensation table.
(7) Mr. Jelinek served as Chief Executive Officer through December 2023 and continued as an employee until his retirement in April 2024.
(8) Mr. Millerchip became Chief Financial Officer on March 15, 2024.
(9) Mr. Galanti served as Chief Financial Officer until March 15, 2024 and continues to serve as an employee.
(10) Mr. Riel's compensation earned in Canada was converted to USD using the average exchange rate for each fiscal period during 2024 and 2023 equaling $1.360 CAD and $1.346 CAD.
19
FISCAL 2024 ALL OTHER COMPENSATION
| Deferred Compensation Match ($) | 401(k) Matching Contribution ($)1 | 401(k) Discretionary Contribution ($)1 | Executive Life Insurance ($) | Long-Term Disability Premiums ($)2 | Tax Gross-Up ($)3 | Other ($)4 | Total All Other Compensation ($)5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | 5,000 | 500 | 29,700 | 3,653 | 10,624 | 6,567 | 120 | 56,164 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W. Craig Jelinek | 5,000 | — | 29,700 | 5,962 | 4,060 | 5,222 | 118,620 | 168,564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gary Millerchip | — | — | — | 1,600 | 6,321 | 29,796 | 44,825 | 82,542 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Galanti | 5,000 | 500 | 29,700 | 6,930 | 8,153 | 4,931 | 120 | 55,334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | 5,000 | 500 | 29,700 | 6,242 | 12,528 | 7,772 | 120 | 61,862 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pierre Riel | — | 500 | 28,038 | 3,682 | 11,820 | 110,435 | 177,336 | 331,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | — | 500 | — | 6,060 | 8,210 | 15,249 | 45,946 | 75,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) The Company has a 401(k) retirement plan that is available to all U.S. employees who have completed 90 days of employment. For all U.S. employees, with the exception of employees covered by union contracts, the plan allows for both pre-tax and/or after-tax (Roth) deferral, for which the Company matches 50% of the first $1,000 of employee contributions. In addition, the Company provides each eligible participant an annual discretionary contribution based on salary and years of service. The matching and discretionary contributions vest ratably until fully vested, after five years of service.
(2) Long-term disability insurance is extended to all employees who are either at the level of senior vice-president and above or who are eligible to participate in the deferred compensation plan and who have 20 or more years of service.
(3) Executives are compensated for their additional tax costs associated with the Company’s payments on their behalf for long-term disability insurance and relocation costs.
(4) Executives receive a free executive membership card. Mr. Jelinek's other compensation also includes a $100,000 regulatory filing fee paid by the Company and $18,500 in pro-rated fees for serving as a non-employee director from April 2024. Messrs. Millerchip and Polit includes relocation expenses paid by the Company and Mr. Riel's includes housing reimbursement and tax equalization.
(5) Executives, their families, and invited guests occasionally fly on the corporate aircraft as additional passengers on existing business flights. Any incremental cost to the Company is de minimis, and no amount is reflected in the table.
FISCAL 2024 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table provides information regarding grants of awards under any plan during fiscal 2024.
| Name | Type of Award | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards1 | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (Units)2 | All Other Stock Awards (Units)3 | Grant-Date Fair Value of Awards ($)4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Target ($) | Maximum ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | Annual Incentive | 10/16/2024 | 533,333 | 621,333 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance RSUs | 10/22/2023 | — | — | 19,148 | — | 10,592,029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W. Craig Jelinek | Annual Incentive | 10/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Time-based RSUs | 10/22/2023 | — | — | — | 27,617 | 14,620,472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gary Millerchip | Annual Incentive | 10/16/2024 | 99,077 | 116,308 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance RSUs | 3/11/2024 | — | — | 3,922 | — | 2,744,226 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Time-based RSUs | 3/11/2024 | — | — | — | 9,803 | 6,907,445 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Galanti | Annual Incentive | 10/16/2024 | 184,000 | 216,000 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance RSUs | 10/22/2023 | — | — | 9,483 | — | 5,374,408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | Annual Incentive | 10/16/2024 | 184,000 | 216,000 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance RSUs | 10/22/2023 | — | — | 7,433 | — | 4,212,982 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pierre Riel | Annual Incentive | 10/16/2024 | 184,000 | 216,000 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance RSUs | 10/22/2023 | — | — | 7,433 | — | 4,212,982 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | Annual Incentive | 10/16/2024 | 141,538 | 166,154 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance RSUs | 12/18/2023 | — | — | 6,737 | — | 3,726,835 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Time-based RSUs | 12/18/2023 | — | — | — | 3,683 | 2,413,905 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) The amounts shown represent the target and maximum amounts of annual cash bonus compensation that, depending on Company and individual performance, might have been paid for fiscal 2024 performance. The actual amount paid for fiscal 2024 is included in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column and corresponding footnote of the Summary Compensation Table on page 19. See
20
description under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2024 Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer" and "2024 Compensation of Other Named Executive Officers."
(2) The number of performance-based RSUs granted during fiscal 2024, subject to attainment of the performance criteria described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Equity Compensation.” After the end of fiscal 2024, the Compensation Committee determined that the performance criteria had been exceeded and the awards were earned. The earned awards vested 20% on October 22, 2024, and will vest 20% on October 22 for the following four years, with acceleration of vesting for long service. Reflects adjustments for the special dividend in fiscal 2024.
(3) Represents the time-based sign-on RSU awards granted to Messrs. Millerchip and Polit. Mr. Millerchip's awards will vest ratably over the next three years on the anniversary of the grant date and Mr. Polit's awards vested one-fifth on October 22, 2024, and will vest one-fifth annually on October 22 for the following four years. Mr. Jelinek's awards represents time-based RSUs granted during 2024. These awards fully vested in April 2024 upon his retirement as an employee.
(4) The grant-date fair value of RSU awards granted, computed as described in footnote 3 to the Summary Compensation Table.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2024 YEAR-END
The following table sets forth information regarding unvested stock awards held at September 1, 2024.
| Name | Type of Award | Stock Award Grant Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock Unvested at Fiscal Year-End1,2 | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock Unvested at Fiscal Year-End ($)3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | Performance RSUs | 10/22/2023 | 19,148 | 17,087,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
W. Craig Jelinek4 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gary Millerchip | Performance RSUs | 3/11/2024 | 3,922 | 3,499,914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Time-based RSUs | 3/11/2024 | 9,803 | 8,748,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Galanti | Performance RSUs | 10/22/2023 | 9,483 | 8,462,440 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | Performance RSUs | 10/22/2023 | 7,433 | 6,633,061 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pierre Riel | Performance RSUs | 10/22/2023 | 7,433 | 6,633,061 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | Performance RSUs | 12/18/2023 | 6,737 | 6,011,964 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Time-based RSUs | 12/18/2023 | 3,683 | 3,286,636 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) Reflects adjustments for the special dividend in fiscal 2024.
(2) Performance RSUs are subject to satisfaction of one-year performance conditions. RSUs are also subject to accelerated vesting prior to termination for long service (other than grants to the Chief Executive Officer). RSUs with the following grant dates vest as follows:
| Grant Date | Type of Award | Vesting | ||||||||||||
| 10/22/2023, 12/18/2023 & 3/11/2024 | Performance RSUs | After the end of fiscal 2024, the Compensation Committee certified that the performance criteria had been exceeded and that the awards were earned. The earned awards vested 20% on October 22, 2024, and will vest 20% on October 22 for the following four years. All grants are made annually on October 22, except for grants made to Messrs. Millerchip and Polit, which were made in connection with their joining the Company. The shares above do not reflect accelerated vesting for long service as the awards were not yet released. | ||||||||||||
| 12/18/2023 | Time-based RSUs | Vest 20% annually on each subsequent October 22, over the next five years. | ||||||||||||
| 3/11/2024 | Time-based RSUs | Vest 33% annually on each subsequent March 11, over the next three years. | ||||||||||||
(3) Based on the closing market price of $892.38 on August 30, 2024.
(4) Mr. Jelinek's officer equity awards fully vested in April 2024 upon his retirement as an employee, under the long service vesting policy.
21
FISCAL 2024 RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS VESTED
The following table provides information regarding restricted stock units that vested during fiscal 2024.
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting1 | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | 14,639 | 8,144,554 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W. Craig Jelinek | 84,417 | 58,091,859 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gary Millerchip | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Galanti | 10,457 | 5,817,857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | 8,196 | 4,559,927 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pierre Riel | 7,429 | 4,133,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) Includes shares withheld for payment of taxes associated with the vesting.
FISCAL 2024 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The following table provides information relating to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. See footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table for additional information about the plan.
| Name | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)1 | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)2 | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)3 | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | 120,787 | 5,000 | 158,083 | (192,117) | 1,724,873 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W. Craig Jelinek | 375,962 | 5,000 | 954,315 | — | 10,613,218 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gary Millerchip | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Galanti | 540,523 | 5,000 | 1,588,349 | — | 17,745,923 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | 57,025 | 5,000 | 75,819 | (176,260) | 800,068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pierre Riel | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) Amounts were included in “Salary,” “Bonus,” or "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2) Amounts were included in "All Other Compensation" in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3) Amounts representing interest on the Named Executive Officer's balance that is "above market" (greater than 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate) are included in "Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings" in the Summary Compensation Table.
(4) Of these amounts, the following amounts have also been reported in the Summary Compensation Table:
| Name | Reported for Fiscal 2024 ($) | Previously Reported for Fiscal 2023 ($) | Previously Reported for Fiscal 2022 ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | 194,925 | 209,340 | 148,091 | |||||||||||||||||
| W. Craig Jelinek | 803,623 | 930,518 | 683,531 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gary Millerchip | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Galanti | 1,248,871 | 1,085,358 | 746,207 | |||||||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | 94,788 | 76,566 | 34,890 | |||||||||||||||||
| Pierre Riel | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
22
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
The Company does not have any individual change-in-control agreements with any executive officer, director, or employee. Plans under which RSUs have been granted provide for accelerated vesting under certain circumstances in the event of a change in control. The amounts shown in the following table reflect the potential value to the Named Executive Officers as of the end of fiscal 2024 of full acceleration of all unvested RSUs under certain circumstances in connection with a change in control of the Company and acceleration of unvested RSUs upon certain terminations of employment.
The amounts shown assume that a change in control or termination was effective as of the last business day of fiscal 2024 and that the price of Costco common stock on which the calculations were based was the closing price on August 30, 2024 ($892.38). They are estimates of the incremental amounts that would be received upon a change in control or termination of employment; the actual amount could be determined only at the time of any actual change in control or termination of employment. In the event of a termination other than for cause: (i) proportional vesting (measured on a quarterly basis) occurs for the time period between termination and the grant date or grant date anniversary; and (ii) accelerated vesting for long service occurs based on years of service. For purposes of the foregoing, the vesting formula for long service is: 33% for 25 or more years of service; 66% for 30 or more years of service; and 100% for 35 or more years of service. RSUs also provide for accelerated vesting for long service prior to termination. There is no accelerated vesting in the event of a termination for cause.
The following table provides information regarding the estimated potential incremental payments upon termination or change in control.
| Change in Control | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Total Value of RSUs Vested Upon Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason ($)1 | Total Value of RSUs That May Vest ($)1, 2 | Total Value of RSUs Vested Upon Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason ($)1, 2, 3 | |||||||||||||||||
| Ron M. Vachris | 17,087,292 | 17,087,292 | 17,087,292 | |||||||||||||||||
W. Craig Jelinek4 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Gary Millerchip | — | 12,247,915 | 12,247,915 | |||||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Galanti | — | 8,462,440 | 8,462,440 | |||||||||||||||||
| Russ D. Miller | — | 6,633,061 | 6,633,061 | |||||||||||||||||
| Pierre Riel | — | 6,633,061 | 6,633,061 | |||||||||||||||||
| Javier Polit | — | 9,298,600 | 9,298,600 | |||||||||||||||||
_______________________
(1) Total value calculated assuming a termination or change-in-control date of September 1, 2024, and utilizing the closing market price on August 30, 2024.
(2) Maximum value of RSUs that in the event of a change in control of the Company are not assumed or substituted under the 2019 Plan.
(3) Maximum value of RSUs that in the event of termination without cause or for good reason after a change in control are not assumed or substituted under the 2019 Plan.
(4) All of Mr. Jelinek's outstanding RSUs vested for long service upon his retirement as an employee in April 2024.
Deferred Compensation Plan. In the event that a Named Executive Officer’s employment with the Company is terminated, either voluntarily or involuntarily, the officer will receive the balance of the deferred compensation account no sooner than six months following termination of employment or death. The balance of each Named Executive Officer’s deferred compensation account as of the end of fiscal 2024 is set forth in the table titled “Fiscal 2024 Non-qualified Deferred Compensation.” In the event of a threatened change in control of the Company, the Compensation Committee may act to protect the participants, including accelerating vesting or terminating the plan and paying benefits to participants.
Potential Payments Under Mr. Vachris’s Employment Agreement. In December 2023, the Company and Mr. Vachris entered into an employment agreement effective January 1, 2024, with a one-year term. If Mr. Vachris’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by Mr. Vachris with good reason, Mr. Vachris will receive a lump-sum cash payment equal to 1.5 times his annual base salary and target bonus and full acceleration of unvested RSUs. The estimated amount Mr. Vachris would have received as cash
23
severance in the event of such termination as of September 1, 2024, is $2.5 million. The actual amount could be determined only at the time of any actual termination. Upon termination due to disability, Mr. Vachris would be eligible for continued medical coverage and receive full acceleration of unvested RSUs as described above.
“Good reason” is defined in the agreement as a material diminution in Mr. Vachris's salary or target bonus, in authority, duties or responsibilities, or in the budget over which he retains authority, causing him to report to anyone other than the Board, a material change in geographic location at which he must perform services, or any breach by the Company of the employment agreement.
“Cause” is defined in the agreement as an intentional tort causing substantial loss, damage or injury to the Company, any serious crime or intentional, material act of fraud or dishonesty against the Company, the commission of a felony that results in other than immaterial harm to the Company’s business or to the reputation of the Company or Mr. Vachris; habitual neglect of reasonable duties, disregard of written, material policies of the Company that causes other than immaterial loss, damage or injury to the property or reputation of the Company, or any material breach of Mr. Vachris's obligation to not disclose confidential information or to assign intellectual property developed during employment.
Under the terms of Mr. Vachris’s fiscal employment agreement, in the event of termination of his employment for any reason other than cause, if the Compensation Committee of the Board determines that the performance goals established for the outstanding performance RSU award have been met, Mr. Vachris will receive the award, subject to the long service and quarterly vesting provisions generally applied for terminations in connection with RSU awards as described above. The table above shows the estimated incremental amounts Mr. Vachris would receive in respect of his fiscal 2024 award in connection with a hypothetical termination of employment at December 31, 2024.
Potential Payments under Mr. Millerchip's offer letter. Under Mr. Millerchip’s offer letter entered into in January 2024, if at the time of a termination other than for cause he has achieved ten years of service he will vest in 25% of his unvested RSUs, subject to the achievement of any outstanding performance conditions. This is in addition to the long service and quarterly vesting provisions generally applied for terminations in connection with RSU awards as described above.
Equity Compensation Plans. Under the Company’s 2019 Incentive Plan, in the event of a “fundamental transaction” or “change in control”: (i) with respect to stock awards that are assumed, substituted or continued, if the Company terminates the participant’s employment without “cause” or the participant terminates with “good reason” upon or during the 12-month period following the fundamental transaction or change in control, the stock award will become fully vested and any performance conditions imposed with respect to the award will be deemed to be achieved at the greater of the actual levels of achievement as of the date of such termination and the target performance levels; and (ii) if the stock award is not assumed, substituted or continued, the Board will fully accelerate time-based awards and provide for pro-rata acceleration of performance-based stock awards at the greater of actual levels of achievement or target, or cancel the awards in exchange for cash payments to the participant. The plan has detailed definitions of “good reason”, “cause,” “change in control” and “fundamental transaction.” Generally speaking, “good reason,” except as otherwise defined in an employment agreement, is defined as a material diminution in the participant’s authority, duties or responsibilities or a material change in geographic location at which the participant must perform services. “Cause” is defined as dishonesty, fraud, misconduct, disclosure or misuse of confidential information, conviction of, or a plea of guilty or no contest to, a felony or similar offense, habitual absence from work for reasons other than illness, intentional conduct that could cause significant injury to the Company or an affiliate, or habitual abuse of alcohol or a controlled substance. “Change in control” is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) a majority of the Board is replaced in any two-year period other than by directors approved by existing directors; or (ii) any person or group acquires shares having 30% or more of the voting power of all outstanding shares; or (iii) a merger or in which outstanding shares are converted into shares of another company or other securities (of either the Company or another company) or cash or other property. “Fundamental transaction” is defined as the merger of the Company with another entity in a transaction in which the Company is not the surviving entity or if, as a result
24
of any other transaction or event, other securities are substituted for Company shares or shares may no longer be issued.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee is an executive officer or former officer of the Company. No executive officer of the Company served on the board of directors of any entity whose executive officers included a director of the Company.
CEO PAY RATIO
As required by SEC rules, we are reporting the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our “median employee.” The latter is an estimate calculated consistent with SEC rules, based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. SEC rules allow a variety of methodologies and exclusions and permit reasonable estimates and assumptions.
Identification of the Median Employee
The year to date period ended June 30th, 2024, was utilized to determine the median employee. At that date, we had approximately 328,000 employees worldwide, of which approximately 216,800 were located in the United States and its territories. As permitted by SEC rules, we excluded as de minimis employees of the following when identifying the median employee: Spain, France, China, Iceland, Spain, New Zealand and Taiwan. As a result, the “considered population” for identifying the median employee was approximately 316,000. The pool included full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary employees. For determining the median employee, we used a combination of salary, bonus, equity compensation, and other measurable benefits considered in determining that employee's identity. Non-U.S. employees’ compensation was converted to U.S. dollars using an average exchange-rate for the year to date period. The median employee in the considered population had a total compensation of $47,092.
Ratio
During fiscal 2024, Mr. Jelinek served as CEO until December 31, 2023, and Mr. Vachris served thereafter. For purposes of calculating the pay ratio, we annualized the salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation of Mr. Vachris. All other components of his compensation are the same amounts as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Vachris's total compensation for the purposes of this calculation was $12,354,831. Based upon the estimates, assumptions, and methodology described above, the pay ratio is 262:1. This ratio may not be comparable to that reported by other companies due to differences in industries, scope of international operations, business models and scale, as well as the differences in estimates, assumptions, methodologies, and companies not having two CEOs during the year.
Supplemental Ratio
Approximately 39% of the “considered population” were part-time, seasonal or temporary workers, which significantly impacts the ratio shown above. We believe it is appropriate to present a supplemental calculation using the same methodology as above except that it includes only workers who are full-time. Using this methodology, the median employee has a total compensation of $64,318, resulting in a pay ratio of 192:1.
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, this section describes the relationship between compensation actually paid and certain financial performance measures of the Company. For information about the philosophy, objectives and criteria of executive pay as they pertain to the Company's performance, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section.
25
| Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO($)1 | Summary Compensation Table Total for Former PEO($)1 | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO($)1,2 | Compensation Actually Paid to Former PEO($)1,2 | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs($)1 | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs($)1,2 | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | Net Income($)5 (in millions) | (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TSR($)3 | Peer Group TSR($)4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The principal executive officer(s) (PEOs), Former PEO and Non-PEO named executive officers (Non-PEO NEOs) for each year were as follows:
| Year | PEO | Former PEO | Non-PEO NEOs | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | Gary Millerchip, Richard A. Galanti, Russ D. Miller, Pierre Riel, Javier Polit | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | Ron M. Vachris, Richard A. Galanti, Russ D. Miller, Pierre Riel | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | Ron M. Vachris, Richard A. Galanti, Russ D. Miller, James P. Murphy | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | Ron M. Vachris, Richard A. Galanti, James P. Murphy, Joseph P. Portera | |||||||||||||||||||
(2) The dollar amounts represent the amount of "compensation actually paid" or "CAP" as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned or paid to the PEO or Non-PEO NEOs during the applicable year. The following table represents the adjustments made to the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) total compensation for fiscal 2024 to calculate the compensation actually paid. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of the grant.
| PEO($) | Former PEO($) | Average for Non-PEO NEOs($) | ||||||||||||||||||
| SCT Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Deduct, amounts reported under "stock awards" column in the SCT Table | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||
| Add, fair value at vesting date of stock awards granted and vested in the current fiscal year | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Add, fair value at fiscal year end of outstanding and unvested stock awards granted in the current fiscal year | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Add, change in fair value of outstanding and unvested stock awards granted in prior fiscal years | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Add, change in fair value as of vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) for stock awards granted in any prior fiscal year for which vesting conditions were satisfied during the fiscal year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation Actually Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||
(3) The Total Shareholder Return (TSR) represents the cumulative total return on an initial fixed investment of $100 invested in the Company's common stock from the last day of trading in fiscal 2020 to the last day of trading in each of the applicable fiscal years. The return assumes reinvestment of dividends.
(4) The Peer Group TSR represents the S&P Retail Select Index, the index we use in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K, included in our fiscal year 2024 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2024.
(5) Represents net income reflected in the Company's audited financial statements.
(6) Represents net sales adjusted for changes in foreign currencies. This selected measure is used as a performance condition for certain annual performance-based awards for both the PEO and Non-PEO NEOs. Please refer to Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial Measures for a reconciliation of net sales adjusted for changes in foreign currencies, which is a non-GAAP measure, to net sales under GAAP.
Relationship among Compensation Actually Paid and Performance Measures
The charts below reflect the relationship among compensation actually paid compared to the Company's TSR and peer group TSR, net income, and net sales adjusted for changes in foreign currencies over the past four fiscal years. Compensation actually paid reflects the value of outstanding performance-based grants at specified fiscal year ends and does not have a direct comparison to performance trends.
26
The following chart shows the relationship among compensation actually paid to our PEO, Former PEO, the average compensation actually paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and TSR for the applicable fiscal years. Our peer group TSR is also included. Refer to footnotes 3 and 4 in the table above for TSR methodology for Costco and the peer group.
The following chart shows the relationship among compensation actually paid to our PEO, Former PEO, the average compensation actually paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and net income for the applicable fiscal years.
27
The following chart shows the relationship among compensation actually paid to our PEO, Former PEO, the average compensation actually paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and net sales adjusted for changes in foreign currencies for the applicable fiscal years. Refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to net sales under GAAP.
Financial Performance Measures
The following list represents the most important metrics used to link Company performance to compensation actually paid for the most recently completed fiscal year. Only two measures are identified because they are the only measures used by the Company to link executive compensation to Company performance.
•Net Sales Adjusted for Changes in Foreign Currencies
•Income Before Income Taxes Adjusted for Changes in Foreign Currencies and Unusual Items
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
Jim Klauer, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Northern Division, has a daughter-in-law who was employed by the Company during fiscal 2024, with annual compensation of $128,644. She also participated in benefit plans generally available to employees in comparable positions under similar terms and conditions.
Teresa Jones, Executive Vice President, Global Depots and Traffic, has three brothers who were employed by the Company during fiscal 2024: one with annual compensation of $240,723 and a grant of 728 RSUs; one with annual compensation of $143,331 and a grant of 217 RSUs; and one with annual compensation of $119,748. The number of shares were all subsequently adjusted due to the special dividend paid in January 2024. All three brothers also participated in benefit plans generally available to employees in comparable positions under similar terms and conditions.
These relationships and related transactions were approved by the Audit Committee. The charter of the Audit Committee requires the Committee to review and approve all related-person transactions that are required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. There were no transactions required to be reported in this Proxy Statement since the beginning of fiscal 2024 where this policy did not require review, approval or ratification or where this policy was not followed. No family members of executive officers or directors are executive officers of the Company.
28
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
October 29, 2024
To the Board of Directors:
We reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended September 1, 2024. We discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission and the matters required to be reported to the Audit Committee by the independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 2.07.
We received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors’ communications with this Committee concerning independence and have discussed with the auditors their independence. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 1, 2024.
Kenneth D. Denman, Chair
Susan L. Decker
Helena B. Foulkes
Sally Jewell
CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS
The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. A copy may be obtained at no charge by sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary, 999 Lake Drive, Issaquah, Washington 98027. If the Company makes any amendments to this code (other than technical, administrative, or non-substantive amendments) or grants any waivers, including implicit waivers, from this code to the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or controller, we will disclose (on our website at https://investor.costco.com or in a Form 8-K report filed with the SEC) the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date, and to whom it applies.
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Information Regarding Our Independent Auditors
KPMG has served as our independent auditors since May 13, 2002. Upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board has appointed KPMG as our independent auditors for fiscal 2025.
Services and Fees of KPMG
The following table presents fees for services rendered by KPMG for fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023:
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
| Audit fees | $ | 10,748,000 | $ | 10,181,000 | ||||||||||
| Audit-related fees | 384,000 | 609,000 | ||||||||||||
| Tax fees | 900,000 | 604,000 | ||||||||||||
| All other fees | — | 3,000 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 12,032,000 | $ | 11,397,000 | ||||||||||
29
KPMG was paid fees for the following types of services during fiscal 2024:
•Audit Fees consist of fees paid for the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K and review of interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for the audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Audit fees also include fees for any services associated with statutory audits of subsidiaries and affiliates of the Company, and with registration statements, reports and documents filed with the SEC, including out of pocket expenses associated with the audits, and certain acquisitions and accounting consultations about the application of generally accepted accounting principles to proposed and executed transactions.
•Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for audits of financial statements and attest services not required by statute or regulations, and certain regulatory certifications.
•Tax Fees consist of fees for the review or preparation of international income, franchise, value-added tax or other tax returns, including consultations on such matters, assistance with studies supporting amounts presented in tax returns, and consultations on various tax compliance matters.
Audit Committee Preapproval Policy
All services to be performed for the Company by KPMG must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or a designated member of the Audit Committee, as provided in the committee’s written policies. All services provided by KPMG in fiscal 2024 were properly pre-approved.
Annual Independence Determination
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision by KPMG of non-audit services to the Company in fiscal 2024 is compatible with KPMG’s maintaining its independence.
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Subject to ratification by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the Board, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, has selected KPMG to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2025. KPMG has issued its reports, included in the Company’s Form 10-K, on the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended September 1, 2024. Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal will constitute ratification of the appointment of KPMG.
The Audit Committee and Board of Directors unanimously recommend that you vote FOR Proposal 2.
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
As required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we request your advisory (non-binding) vote on the following resolution (“say on pay”): “Resolved, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.”
In 2023, following an advisory vote of the shareholders on frequency, the Board determined to continue to include say on pay votes in the Company's proxy materials annually until the next required shareholder vote on frequency.
The Board and the Compensation Committee, which is composed of independent directors, expect to take into account the outcome of the say on pay vote when considering future executive compensation decisions to the extent they can determine the cause or causes of any significant negative voting results.
30
As described in detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our compensation programs are designed to motivate our executives to continue the success of the Company. If fully earned through achievement of performance targets, equity compensation in the form of restricted stock units (which are subject to further time-based vesting) is the largest component of executive compensation. We believe that our compensation program rewards sustained performance that is aligned with long-term shareholder interests. Shareholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure.
PROPOSAL 4: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING REPORT ON THE RISKS OF MAINTAINING DEI EFFORTS
The following shareholder proposal has been submitted to the Company for action at the Annual Meeting by the National Center for Public Policy Research, 2005 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC 20036. The proposal will be voted on at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the proponent.
PROPONENT’S STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
Supporting Statement: Last year, the US Supreme Court ruled in SFFA v. Harvard that discriminating on the basis of race in college admissions violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.1 Prior legal advice regarding the legality of corporate Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs has been called into question post-SFFA.2 As such, Attorneys General of 13 States warned Fortune 100 companies that SFFA implicated corporate DEI programs.3
Since SFFA, a number of DEI-related lawsuits have been filed. A corporation was successfully sued for a single case of discrimination against a white employee resulting in an award of more than $25 million,4 and the risk of being sued for such discrimination appears to be rising.5 Additionally, many major companies have begun to roll back prior DEI commitments and lay off employees from DEI departments.6 Alphabet and Meta cut DEI staff and DEI-related investments,7 Microsoft laid off an entire a [sic] DEI team,8 as did Zoom,9 and John Deere publicly stated that it has halted many policies that were previously part of its DEI efforts10 after Tractor Supply explicitly stated that it has "eliminate[d] DEI roles and retire[d] our current DEI goals."11
It's clear that DEI holds litigation, reputational and financial risks to the Company, and therefore financial risks to shareholders.
1 https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-fellows-of-harvard-college/
2 https://freebeacon.com/democrats/starbucks-hired-eric-holder-to-conduct-a-civil-rights-audit-the-policies-he-blessed-got-the-coffee-maker-sued/
3 https://ag.ks.gov/docs/default-source/documents/corporate-racial-discrimination-multistate-letter.pdf?sfvrsn=968abc1a_2
4 https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/starbucks-manager-shannon-phillips-wins-25-million-lawsuit-fired-white-donte-robinson-rashon-nelson
5 https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-files-class-action-lawsuit-against-progressive-insurance-for-illegal-racial-dsicrimination/ ; https://aflegal.org/afl-files-federal-civil-rights-complaint-against-activision-for-illegal-racist-sexist-and-discriminatory-hiring-practices-and-sends-letter-to-activision-board-demanding-they-end-unlawful-dei-polici/ ; https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-files-federal-civil-rights-complaint-against-kelloggs-warns-management-that-its-violating-fiduciary-duties/
6 https://techcrunch.com/2024/07/29/dei-backlash-stay-up-to-date-on-the-latest-legal-and-corporate-challenges/
7 https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/22/google-meta-other-tech-giants-cut-dei-programs-in-2023.html
8 https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-layoffs-dei-leader-email-2024-7
9 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-06/zoom-dei-workers-fired-in-recent-round-of-job-cuts
10 https://x.com/JohnDeere/status/1813318977650847944
11 https://corporate.tractorsupply.com/newsroom/news-releases/news-releases-details/2024/Tractor-Supply-Company-Statement/default.aspx
31
And yet Costco still has such a program, though it was apprehensive enough to recognize this as it recently and quietly rebranded its DEI program to "People and Communities."12 But sticking a new label on discriminatory practices does not protect Costco and its shareholders from these risks.
The renamed program still openly expresses a "commitment to equity"13 (which means equality of outcome, not opportunity), still employs a "Chief Diversity Officer,"14 still has a supplier diversity program that picks suppliers based on their race and sex,15 still appears to factor in race and sex in hiring and promotion, and still contributes shareholder money to organizations that advance the discriminatory agenda of DEI.16 All of these practices are staples of corporate DEI programs and are consistent with Costco's DEI program prior to its rebranding.
With 310,000 employees,17 Costco likely has at least 200,000 employees who are potentially victims of this type of illegal discrimination because they are white, Asian, male or straight.18 Accordingly, even if only a fraction of those employees were to file suit, and only some of those prove successful, the cost to Costco could be tens of billions of dollars.
Resolved: Shareholders request that the Board conduct an evaluation and publish a report, omitting proprietary and privileged information, on the risks of the Company maintaining its current DEI (including "People & Communities") roles, policies and goals.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSE
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
Our Board has considered this proposal and believes that our commitment to an enterprise rooted in respect and inclusion is appropriate and necessary. The report requested by this proposal would not provide meaningful additional information to our shareholders, and the Board thus unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
Our success at Costco Wholesale has been built on service to our critical stakeholders: employees, members, and suppliers. Our efforts around diversity, equity and inclusion follow our code of ethics:
For our employees, these efforts are built around inclusion – having all of our employees feel valued and respected. Our efforts at diversity, equity and inclusion remind and reinforce with everyone at our Company the importance of creating opportunities for all. We believe that these efforts enhance our capacity to attract and retain employees who will help our business succeed. This capacity is critical because we owe our success to our now over 300,000 employees around the globe.
We welcome members from all walks of life and backgrounds. As our membership diversifies, we believe that serving it with a diverse group of employees enhances satisfaction. Among other things, a diverse group of employees helps bring originality and creativity to our merchandise offerings, promoting the "treasure hunt" that our customers value. That group also helps to provide insights into the tastes and preferences of our members. And we believe (and member feedback shows) that many of our members like to see themselves reflected in the people in our warehouses with whom they interact.
Having diversity in our supplier base, including appropriate attention to small businesses, is beneficial for many of the same reasons diversity benefits our Company. We believe that it fosters creativity and innovation in the merchandise and services that we offer our members.
12 https://web.archive.org/web/20220610163412/https://www.costco.com/sustainability-employees.html#diversity-equity-inclusion; https://www.costco.com/sustainability-people-communities.html
13 https://mobilecontent.costco.com/live/resource/img/23w10059/2a-InclusionNEW_121223.pdf
14 Id.
15 https://mobilecontent.costco.com/live/resource/img/23w10059/2d-SupplierDiversity_NEW.pdf
16 https://mobilecontent.costco.com/live/resource/img/23w10059/2c-CommunitiesNEW1_121323.pdf
17 https://www.costco.com/sustainability-people-communities.html
18 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222
32
Consistent with our commitment to "obey the law," we regularly evaluate our practices concerning compliance with law, including evolving Supreme Court decisions. We believe that our diversity, equity and inclusion efforts are legally appropriate, and nothing in the proposal demonstrates otherwise. As part of our obeying the law, all decisions regarding recruiting, hiring, promotion, assignment, training, termination, and other terms and conditions of employment will be made without unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, age, pregnancy, disability, work-related injury, covered military or veteran status, political ideology or expression, genetic information, marital status, or other protected status.
Combined with our obedience to the law, service to our employees, members and suppliers has rewarded our shareholders. This is our code of ethics. Our focus on diversity, equity and inclusion is not, however, only for the sake of improved financial performance but to enhance our culture and the well-being of people whose lives we influence.
The proponent professes concern about legal and financial risks to the Company and its shareholders associated with the diversity initiatives. The supporting statement demonstrates that it is the proponent and others that are responsible for inflicting burdens on companies with their challenges to longstanding diversity programs. The proponent's broader agenda is not reducing risk for the Company but abolition of diversity initiatives. A 2023 federal district court decision, in a case brought by the proponent, noted that the proponent had "published a document called 'Balancing the Boardroom 2022,' which describes its shareholder activism as 'fighting back' against 'the evils of woke politicized capital and companies.' [The proponent went] on to describe 'CEOs and other corporate executives who are most woke and most hard-left political in their management of their corporations' as 'inimical to the Republic and its blessings of liberty' and 'committed to critical race theory and the socialist foundations of woke' or 'shameless monsters who are willing to sacrifice our future for their comforts.'" National Center for Public Policy Research v. Schultz, E.D. WA. (Sept. 11, 2023). And the proponent's efforts to demonstrate retrenchment on the part of companies are misleading, at best. For example, the assertion that "Microsoft laid off an entire a [sic] DEI team" is simply wrong. It was later reported that Microsoft stated that the two positions eliminated were redundant roles on its events team and that Microsoft’s diversity and inclusion commitments remain unchanged, according to Jeff Jones, a Microsoft spokesperson: “Our focus on diversity and inclusion is unwavering and we are holding firm on our expectations, prioritizing accountability, and continuing to focus on this work.” Colvin, Caroline. Amid DEI cuts, Microsoft works to distinguish itself from those responding to ‘woke’ backlash. HR Dive, July 24, 2024.
We believe that the proponent's request for a study reflects a policy bias with which we disagree and that further study and reporting would not be an efficient use of Company resources.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 4.
OTHER MATTERS
Neither the Board nor management intends to bring before the Annual Meeting any business other than the matters referred to in the Notice of Meeting and this Proxy Statement. If any other business should properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, the persons named in the proxy will vote on such matters according to their judgment.
33
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2026 ANNUAL MEETING
For a shareholder proposal to be included in the proxy statement for the 2026 annual meeting, it must comply with SEC Rule 14a-8 and be received by the Secretary of the Company at the address below no later than August 13, 2025.
To be properly brought before the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders, a notice of a proxy access nomination under section 2.12 of our bylaws must be received by the Secretary of the Company at the address below no earlier than July 14, 2025, and no later than the close of business (5:30 p.m. Pacific Time) on August 13, 2025. Any such notice must meet the other requirements set forth in our bylaws.
A shareholder who intends to present a proposal at the Company’s 2026 annual meeting other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or a proxy access director nomination must comply with our bylaws, which provide that the notice of such intentions must be received by the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth below no earlier than September 25, 2025, and no later than October 25, 2025, and such proposal must be a proper matter for shareholder action under Washington law, or management of the Company will have discretionary voting authority at the 2026 annual meeting with respect to any such proposal without discussion of the matter in the Company’s proxy statement.
Shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in reliance on the SEC's universal proxy rule for director nominees submitted under the advance notice requirements of our bylaws must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b).
Notices of intention to present proposals or nominate directors at the 2026 annual meeting, and all supporting materials required by our bylaws, must be submitted by mail to Secretary, Costco Wholesale Corporation, 999 Lake Drive, Issaquah, Washington 98027.
The Company reserves the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal or nomination that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements. The submission of a shareholder proposal or proxy access or other director nomination does not guarantee that it will be included in our proxy statement.
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND FORM 10-K
The fiscal 2024 Annual Report to Shareholders (which is not a part of our proxy soliciting materials) is being mailed with this Proxy Statement to shareholders that were mailed proxy materials. For shareholders that received the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, this Proxy Statement and our fiscal 2024 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at https://investor.costco.com. Additionally, and in accordance with SEC rules, you may access our Proxy Statement at www.proxyvote.com, a “cookie-free” website that does not identify visitors to the site. A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC will be provided to shareholders without charge upon written request directed to Investor Relations. The Company makes available on or through our website free of charge our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to such reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after filing.
34
GENERAL INFORMATION
List of Shareholders of Record. A list of shareholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available at the Annual Meeting as described above. It will also be available for ten business days prior to the Annual Meeting between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Pacific time, at the office of the Secretary, Costco Wholesale Corporation, 999 Lake Drive, Issaquah, Washington 98027. A shareholder may examine the list for a legally valid purpose related to the Annual Meeting. This list will also be available during the entire time of the Annual Meeting on the meeting website.
Electronic Delivery. The Company is incorporated under Washington law, which specifically permits electronically transmitted proxies, provided that the transmission set forth or be submitted with information from which it can reasonably be determined that the transmission was authorized by the shareholder. The electronic voting procedures provided for the Annual Meeting are designed to authenticate each shareholder by use of a control number to allow shareholders to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.
Householding Information. As permitted by SEC rules, the Company will deliver one Annual Report or Proxy Statement to multiple shareholders sharing the same address unless the Company has received contrary instructions. The Company will, upon written or oral request, deliver a separate copy of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement was delivered and will include instructions as to how the shareholder can notify the Company that the shareholder wishes to receive a separate copy of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement in the future. Registered shareholders wishing to receive a separate Annual Report or Proxy Statement in the future or registered shareholders sharing an address wishing to receive a single copy of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement in the future may contact the Company’s Transfer Agent: Computershare, Inc., P.O. Box 43006, Providence, RI 02940; (800) 249-8982.
| By order of the Board of Directors, | ||
| John Sullivan | ||
| Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | ||
35
APPENDIX A: NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The Compensation Committee uses net sales adjusted for changes in foreign currencies, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as a performance target for RSUs and for a portion of the bonuses granted to executive officers. The Company also uses the non-GAAP measure as its selected financial measure under "Pay Versus Performance." Management believes that this provides a fairer measure (as compared to U.S. dollars) of performance subject to the Company's control. Non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be used as an alternative to direct comparable measures in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies.
In the discussion of net sales adjusted for changes in foreign currencies, we refer to the impact of changes in foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar, which are differences between the foreign-exchange rates we use to convert the financial results of our international operations from local currencies into U.S. dollars. This impact of foreign-exchange rate changes is calculated based on the difference between the current and prior fiscal year currency exchange rates.
The following table reflects the calculation of net sales adjusted for changes in foreign currencies:
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | 249,625 | $ | 237,710 | $ | 222,730 | $ | 192,052 | |||||||||||||||
| Changes in foreign currencies | 474 | 3,484 | 1,762 | (2,759) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales adjusted for changes in foreign currencies | $ | $ | 241,194 | $ | 224,492 | $ | 189,293 | ||||||||||||||||
36