Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc 10-K for FY2024
Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. (CWBHF)
10-K
2025-03-19
For: 2024-12-31
View Original
Added on
April 09, 2026
About this 10-K
Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc filed this 10-K on March 19, 2025, covering the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (FY2024).
Headline figures
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, as reported in this filing, compared with the same period a year earlier where the filing states it.
- Revenue
- $49.67M
- down 21.4% from $63.16M a year earlier
- Net loss
- $29.85M
- compared with a net loss of $23.8M a year earlier
- Diluted EPS
- -$0.19
- compared with -$0.16 a year earlier
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||||
For the fiscal year ended December 31 , 2024
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||||
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-56364
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||||||||||
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(720) 484-8930
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer | o | Accelerated filer | o | ||||||||
x | Smaller reporting company | ||||||||||
Emerging growth company | |||||||||||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. o
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and no-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of the shares of the Registrant's Common Stock on June 30, 2024 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $29.1 million.
The registrant had outstanding 158,009,541 shares of common stock as of March 17, 2025.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 are incorporated herein by reference in Part III.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Form 10-K") contains statements that are, or may be considered to be, "forward-looking statements". Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based on current beliefs, expectations or assumptions regarding the future of the business, future plans and strategies, operational results and other future conditions. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-K regarding the prospects of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc., ("Charlotte’s Web", the "Company" or "we") the industry or its prospects, plans, financial position or business strategy may constitute forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "look forward to", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "will continue", "intends", "the intent of", "have the potential", "anticipates", "does not anticipate", "believes", "should", "should not", or variations of such words and phrases that indicate that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might", or "will", "be taken", "occur", or "be achieved", or the negative of these terms or variations of them or similar terms. Furthermore, forward-looking statements may be included in various filings that the Company makes with the SEC or press releases or oral statements made by or with the approval of one of the Company’s authorized executive officers. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure that these expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in these forward-looking statements.
By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on these statements as a number of important factors could cause the actual results to differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, as applicable, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information and statements include, but are not limited to the risks described in Item 1A—"Risk Factors" of this Form 10-K.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to any forward-looking statements. Readers are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures the Company makes in its reports to the SEC. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this Form 10-K.
Risks Factors Summary
Set forth below is a summary of the principal risks the Company faces:
Risks Relating to the Regulatory Environment
•The regulatory environment surrounding hemp is uncertain, varies among jurisdictions, and is subject to change.
•The future of hemp regulation at the Federal level is unclear.
•The Company’s products are subject to numerous and diverse regulatory requirements which may restrict the Company’s ability to sell its product, and regulatory compliance costs may affect the Company’s business and financial results.
•Compliance with changes in legal, regulatory and industry standards may adversely affect the Company’s business.
•The Company is subject to regulations that could impact its ability to sell its product internationally.
•Entry into international markets diverts management attention and requires financial resources that could be spent elsewhere and poses increased costs due to numerous banking, compliance, financial, legal, market, and reputational issues.
•The designation of cannabinoids as a New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) or as an impermissible adulterant are uncertain.
•The FDA interpretation of IND Preclusion could be disruptive to the Company’s ability to sell its products.
•The FDA enforcement against the sale and marketing of CBD products under the FD&C Act could target the Company and adversely impact the Company’s business and financial position.
•The FTC may take enforcement actions against companies selling CBD products, including the Company.
•The DEA Interpretation of the 2018 Farm Bill could cause the DEA to take enforcement action against the Company’s intermediate hemp products.
•Any inability to obtain required regulatory approval and permits could limit the Company’s ability to conduct its business.
•The Company is subject to environmental, health and safety laws, compliance with such laws may be costly, and any failure to comply with such laws could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
•Regulatory uncertainty with respect to anti-money laundering laws and regulations impact on the CBD and marijuana-related businesses, if revised or resolved unfavorably to the Company’s interests, may have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.
•The Company could be adversely affected by violations of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (Canada), the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other similar anti-bribery laws.
•As a marijuana/cannabis related business, the Company may have difficulty accessing banking services due to the illegality of marijuana under federal law.
•The Company may have difficulty accessing public and private capital and banking services, which could negatively impact its ability to finance its operations.
•The Company could be liable for fraudulent or illegal activity by its employees, contractors and consultants resulting in significant financial losses due to claims against the Company.
Risks Relating to the Company’s Business and Industry
•The Company faces security risks related to its physical facilities.
•The Company depends on the success of its products, and those products may not achieve the desired market acceptance.
•There is no assurance that the Company’s cash flows and debt or other financing will be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations.
•The Company’s products have a limited shelf life and product inventory may reach its expiration prior to sale.
•The Company’s quality control systems may not prove successful.
•The Company depends on various third parties for the supply, manufacture, and testing of some of the Company’s products. No assurance can be given that these relationships will continue on favorable terms, or at all.
•The Company’s manufacturers and suppliers must meet cGMP requirements and failure on their part to do so could have adverse consequences for the Company.
•The Company’s manufacturers and suppliers must remain in compliance with the hemp production and manufacturing laws of the states in which they operate.
•If product liability claims are brought against the Company, it could incur substantial liabilities.
•The Company's operations and industry may be subject to reputational risk.
•The Company is dependent upon agricultural production of hemp for part of the Company's operations, which are subject to seasonal and weather-related risks.
•There may be adverse consequences to the Company's end users should they test positive for trace amounts of THC attributed to use of the Company's products.
•The Company may be unable to obtain adequate crop insurance.
•The Company may be unable to obtain or maintain high quality farmland sufficient for its hemp cultivation needs.
•Climate change could exacerbate certain of the risks inherent in the Company’s agricultural operations.
•Hemp is subject to specific agricultural risks, which could negatively impact the Company’s cultivation efforts.
•The Company relies on third-parties for the transportation of its hemp and hemp-derived products; any delay or failure by these third-parties to meet the Company’s transport needs could impact the Company’s operations and financial performance.
•The Company faces intense competition.
•Changing consumer preferences could impact the Company’s ability to attract and retain customers.
•The Company’s retail customers may not adequately support its products or its relationships with such retailers may deteriorate.
•The Company depends on the popularity and acceptance of its brand portfolio.
•Supply chain issues, including significant price fluctuations or shortages of materials, and distribution challenges may increase the Company’s cost of goods sold and cause its results of operations and financial condition to suffer.
•The Company may not be able to successfully implement its growth strategy on a timely basis, or at all.
•The market for the Company’s products and industry is difficult to forecast due to limited and unreliable market data.
•The Company depends on key personnel and its ability to attract and retain employees.
•From time to time, the Company may rely on debt financing for some of its business activities, and there can be no assurance the Company will be able to access such credit, or that it will be able to comply with the terms of such credit.
•The Company may have difficulty obtaining insurance to cover its operational risks.
•The Company may be subject to growth-related risks, including capacity constraints and pressure on its internal systems and controls.
•The Company may acquire other companies, which could divert management’s attention, result in additional dilution to the Company’s Shareholders and otherwise disrupt the Company and harm its operating results.
•The Company’s intellectual property may be difficult to protect.
•The Company is involved in litigation, including class action litigation, and there may be additional litigation in the future in which it will be involved.
•Trade secrets may be difficult to protect.
•The Company’s status as a public benefit company and a Certified B Corp may not result in the benefits that the Company anticipates.
•As a public benefit company, the Company has a duty to balance a variety of interests that may result in actions that do not maximize Shareholder value.
•As a public benefit company, the Company may be subject to increased legal proceedings concerning its duty to balance Shareholder and public benefit interests, the occurrence of which may have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
•The Company contracts with certain third parties for portions of its operations; should a third party be subject to insolvency or otherwise be unable or unwilling to perform their obligations to the Company, it could negatively impact the Company's operations.
Risks Relating to the Company’s Securities
•The Company has a history of losses and may continue to incur losses in the future.
•Debt and the Convertible Debenture Agreement that the Company currently has in place may limit other future potential strategic investor interests.
•The Company has required and, in the future, may require additional financing to operate its business, and it may face difficulties acquiring additional financing on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all.
•The Company has discretion in the use of proceeds from its securities issuances.
•There is a limited market for the Company’s Common Shares.
•The market price of the Company’s Common Shares and other listed securities may be volatile.
•The Company does not intend to pay dividends on its Common Shares and, consequently, the ability of investors to achieve a return on their investment will depend entirely on appreciation in the price of the Company’s Common Shares.
•The Company is a holding company and its earnings depend on the earnings and distributions of its subsidiaries.
•Future sales of Common Shares by Shareholders, directors or officers could create volatility in the Company’s share price.
•A small number of Shareholders may exercise significant influence on matters submitted to Shareholders for approval.
•The Company may issue an unlimited number of Common Shares, and additional issuances could dilute a Shareholder’s holdings.
•Purchasers of the Company’s Common Shares may experience immediate and substantial dilution of their investment.
•The elimination of monetary liability against the Company’s directors, officers, and employees under British Columbia law and the existence of indemnification rights for the Company’s obligations to its directors, officers, and employees may result in substantial expenditures by the Company and may discourage lawsuits against its directors, officers, and employees.
•There may be difficulty in enforcing judgments and effecting service of process on directors and officers who are not citizens of the United States.
•The Company’s Articles provide that the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada and the Court of Appeal of British Columbia, Canada shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for derivative actions, actions relating to breaches of fiduciary duty, and other matters, creating a conflict with U.S. federal securities laws, which may limit the ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with the Company.
•The Company is subject to U.S. and other income tax and is treated as a U.S. domestic company for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
General Risk Factors
•Investment in the Company’s Common Shares is speculative, involves risk, and there is no guarantee of a return.
•Product recalls and returns could adversely affect the Company’s operating results and financial condition.
•The Company may be subject to impairment of intangible and long-lived assets, which could adversely impact the Company’s financial results.
•Certain employees or directors of the Company may have interests that conflict with those of the Company.
•The future growth of the Company depends on the effectiveness and efficiency of its advertising and promotional expenditures to attract and retain customers.
•The use of customer information and other personal and confidential information creates compliance risks.
•The Company faces risks related to its information technology systems and potential cyber-attacks and security and privacy breaches.
•Demand for the Company’s products and services are influenced by general economic and consumer trends beyond the Company’s control.
•The costs of being a public company in both Canada and the United States are high and may strain the Company’s resources.
•The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting may not be effective, and the Company’s independent auditors may be unwilling or unable to provide us, when required, with an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
•The Company may have to amend prior financial reporting.
•If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports, or publish misleading, inaccurate or unfavorable research about the Company, its business or its market, its share price and trading volume could decline.
•Changes in tax laws could require the Company to pay additional tax amounts, decreasing the amount of capital available to the Company.
•Recent macroeconomic trends, including inflation, a recession or slowed economic growth, may adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results from operations.
CHARLOTTE'S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
* * * * * * *
Item 1. Business
General
Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc., ("Charlotte's Web", the "Company" or "we"), a benefit company under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) ("BCBCA"), S.B.C. 2002, c. 57, as amended, including the regulations promulgated thereunder, and a Certified B Corp headquartered in Louisville, Colorado, was incorporated under the BCBCA on May 18, 2018 under the name Stanley Brothers Holdings Inc. On July 12, 2018, the Company changed its name to Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. On August 29, 2018, the Company filed articles of amendment to amend its share capital in connection with its initial public offering to authorize the issuance of common shares ("Common Shares"), preferred shares and proportionate voting shares ("Proportionate Voting Shares") of the Company. On November 3, 2021, all outstanding Proportionate Voting Shares of the Company were converted by way of mandatory conversion in accordance with the Company's Articles and at the discretion of the Company, into Common Shares. Pursuant to the Company's Articles, the Company is no longer authorized to issue additional Proportionate Voting Shares. The Company's Common Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") under the symbol, "CWEB". The Company's Common Shares are also quoted on the over-the-counter stock market, the OTCQX, in the United States under the symbol, "CWBHF".
The Company is a market leader in the United States in innovative hemp extract and other botanical-based wellness products under a family of brands which includes Charlotte’s Web™, CBD Medic™, and CBD Clinic™. Charlotte's Web branded premium quality full-spectrum CBD products start with proprietary hemp genetics that are 100% North American farm grown and manufactured into hemp extracts containing naturally occurring phytocannabinoids including cannabidiol ("CBD"), cannabichromene ("CBC"), cannabigerol ("CBG"), cannabinol ("CBN"), terpenes, flavonoids and other beneficial hemp compounds. The Company operates from its cGMP (current good manufacturing practices) compliant production facility in Louisville, Colorado (the "LOFT") where it produces hemp oil tinctures and maintains distribution, quality control and research and development ("R&D") activities. Charlotte’s Web product categories include functional mushroom gummies, and hemp extract oil tinctures (liquid products), gummies, capsules, topical creams and lotions, and pet products. The Company also produces NSF Certified for Sport® broad-spectrum tincture and gummy products. Charlotte’s Web products are distributed to retail outlets and health care practitioners, as well as online through the Company’s website at www.charlottesweb.com and other third-party e-commerce sites. The information provided on the Company's website is not part of this report or any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC.
The business of the Company consists of the farming, manufacturing, sales, and marketing of hemp-derived CBD and other botanical-based wellness products, including functional mushroom gummies. As of December 31, 2024, the Company operated in a single operating and reportable segment, hemp-derived CBD wellness products, making up the majority of the revenue of the Company. The executive officers reviewed overall operating results in order to assess financial performance and to make resource allocation decisions, rather than assessing any lower-level unit of operations in isolation.
Hemp extracts are produced from the plant Cannabis sativa L. ("cannabis") and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol ("THC") concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis ("hemp"). The Company is engaged in research involving a broad variety of compounds derived from hemp, as well as other botanical-based wellness products such as functional mushrooms. Where such research indicates that a product may have a potential therapeutic use, the Company may consider pursuing development of that use in jurisdictions where it is legal to do so in accordance with applicable regulations and if consistent with the Company’s strategic vision.
The Company does not currently produce or sell medicinal or recreational marijuana or products derived from high-THC cannabis plants. On March 2, 2021, Charlotte's Web executed an Option Purchase Agreement (the "SBH Purchase Option") pursuant to which the Company has the option to acquire Stanley Brothers USA Holdings, Inc. ("Stanley Brothers USA"), a cannabis wellness incubator. Until the SBH Purchase Option is exercised, both Charlotte's Web and Stanley Brothers USA will continue to operate as standalone entities in the US. Outside of the US, the companies are able to explore opportunities where cannabis is federally permissible. At this time, however, the Company does not have any plans to expand into high-THC products in the near future.
1
The Company grows its proprietary hemp domestically in the United States on farms leased in northeastern Colorado and sources high quality hemp through contract farming operations in Arizona, Colorado, Kentucky, and Canada. The hemp grown in Canada is utilized exclusively for the Canadian market and not in the Company's products sold in the United States.
The Company continues to invest in R&D efforts to identify new product opportunities. Management is working to expand the Company’s production capacity, and to find opportunities for continuous improvement in the supply chain including in-sourcing production to reduce its dependence on third party contract manufacturers. The Company is working to capitalize on the rapidly emerging botanical-based wellness products industry by driving customer acquisition and retention, as well as accelerating national and international retail expansion. In addition, the Company may consider expanding its product line beyond hemp-based products and functional mushrooms should the science and the Company’s strategic vision support such expansion.
In furtherance of the Company’s R&D efforts, in February 2020, the Company established CW Labs, an internal division for R&D, to substantially expand the Company’s efforts around the science of hemp-derived compounds. CW Labs is currently engaged in clinical trials addressing hemp-based solutions. CW Labs is located at the LOFT in Louisville, Colorado.
Effective as of November 14, 2022, the Company entered into a subscription agreement (the "Subscription Agreement") with BT DE Investments, Inc. a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAT Group (LSE: BATS and NYSE: BTI), providing for the issuance of an approximately $56.8 million ("Canadian Dollar" C$75.3 million) convertible debenture (the "debenture"), convertible into 19.9% ownership of the Company’s Common Shares at a conversion price of C$2.00 per Common Share of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX"). The debenture will accrue interest at a stated annualized rate of 5% until such time that there is federal regulation permitting the use of cannabidiol, a phytocannabinoid derived from the plant Cannabis sativa L. ("CBD") as an ingredient in food products and dietary supplements in the United States. Following federal regulation of CBD, the stated annualized rate of interest shall reduce to 1.5%. The maturity date for the debenture is November 2029.
On April 6, 2023, the Company jointly formed an entity, DeFloria, Inc. ("DeFloria"), with AJNA BioSciences PBC ("AJNA"), and a subsidiary of British American Tobacco PLC (LSE: BATS and NYSE: BTI) ("BAT"). The entity was established to pursue FDA-approval for a botanical drug to target a neurological condition. The Company and AJNA each hold 4,000,000 or approximately 50%, respectively, of the entity’s voting common units. Additionally, AJNA holds an additional $2 million secured convertible indenture that can be converted upon an additional qualified financing or upon maturity of such indenture. BAT holds an equity interest (a) in the form of 2,000,000 or 100% preferred units, and (b) a $5 million secured convertible indenture that can be converted upon an additional qualified financing or upon maturity of such indenture.
In October 2022, the Company entered into a Promotional Rights Agreement (the "MLB Promotional Rights Agreement") with MLB Advanced Media L.P., on its own behalf and on behalf of Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, The MLB Network, LLC and the Major League Baseball Clubs (collectively, the "MLB"), pursuant to which the Company entered into an exclusive strategic partnership with MLB to promote the Company’s new NSF Certified for Sport® product line. On February 5, 2024, the Company and MLB entered into an amendment to extend the MLB Promotional Rights Agreement through December 31, 2027, with an aggregate rights fee of $23 million for the remainder of the term.
In September 2024, the Company launched its new functional mushroom gummy product line with three formulations: Focus Support, Stress Support, and Energy Support. These mushroom products are hemp-free and expand the Company's ongoing commitment to providing science-supported botanical-based solutions to its customers.
Public Benefit Company Status
The Company became a benefit company under the BCBCA on July 24, 2020. Benefit companies are a class of corporations in British Columbia that are formally and legally empowered to conduct their business in a responsible and sustainable manner and promote one or more public benefits. Under British Columbia law, benefit companies are required to identify in their Articles the public benefit or benefits they will promote. Their directors have a duty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to conducting business in a responsible and sustainable manner and to promote the company’s public benefits and must balance this duty with their general fiduciary duties under section 142(1)(a) of the BCBCA to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company. As a benefit company, the Company must balance a variety of interests that may result in actions that do not maximize Shareholder value as the board of directors of the Company (the "Board" or the "Board of Directors") must balance the interests of Shareholders and stakeholders in working to
2
achieve the Company’s public benefits. See "Risk Factors – As a public benefit company, the Company has a duty to balance a variety of interests that may result in actions that do not maximize Shareholder value."
In practice, the Board of Directors of the Company takes an expanded view of decision making to balance their fiduciary duties and their duty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to conducting business in a responsible and sustainable manner and to promote the Company’s public benefits, including weighing potential conflicts of interest and ultimately making decisions that the Board believes most appropriately address all of the Board’s duties. British Columbia courts have generally been deferential to the business decisions of directors, as directors are in the best position to take into account the diverse interests of a company and its stakeholders (including what weight to give to Shareholder interests), as long as the business decision lies within the range of reasonable alternatives. However, as a benefit company, there is uncertainty as to how British Columbia courts would view the balancing of these interests and the weighing of Shareholder and Stakeholder concerns. See "Risk Factors - As a benefit company, the Company may be subject to increased legal proceedings concerning its duty to balance Shareholder and public benefit interests, the occurrence of which may have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations."
Benefit companies also are required under the BCBCA to publish on their websites and provide to their Shareholders an annual benefit report that assesses, against a selected third-party standard, their performance, in carrying out the commitments set out in the benefit company’s benefit provisions. The Company’s annual benefit report discloses, in relation to the most recently completed fiscal year, (a) a fair and accurate description of the ways it demonstrated commitment to conducting its business in a responsible and sustainable manner, and to promoting the public benefits specified in its Articles; (b) a record of assessment based on a third-party standard; and (c) the circumstances, if any, that hindered the Company’s endeavors to carry out the commitments set out in the Company’s benefit provision. For so long as the Company is a benefit company under the BCBCA, the Company will include an annual benefit report as part of its annual proxy materials sent to its Shareholders and post the report to its website.
The Company’s public benefit, as provided in its Articles, is "to pioneer the way to healthier lives, stronger communities, and a more bountiful planet by making it easier for everyone to access the natural restorative power of plants." Accordingly, this social focus includes contributing to non-profit organizations and charities, which are made on an ad hoc basis, concentrating first on those entities that have historically supported the business through education of existing and potential customers. The Company also supports non-profits that it believes can utilize the wellness aspects of its products (i.e., military veterans, adaptive athletes, educational organizations, etc.). By doing so, the Company believes that socially oriented actions will ultimately have a positive impact on the Company, its employees, and its Shareholders.
In addition to being a benefit company, the Company is a "Certified B Corp", as certified by B Lab, the US non-profit organization which administers this certification. Certified B Corps (also referred to as "B Corps" or "B Corporations") are for-profit companies that use the power of business to build a more inclusive and sustainable economy. Certified B Corps are required to consider the impact of their decisions on all stakeholders: customers, workers, communities, and the environment. These requirements are aligned with the Company’s socially conscious strategic vision. The Company’s status as a Certified B Corp is distinct from and has no impact on its status as a benefit company under the BCBCA.
History and Development of the Company
The seven Stanley brothers (the "Stanley Brothers") founded CWB Holdings, Inc. (predecessor to Charlotte's Web, Inc. ("CW"), a subsidiary of the Company) on December 8, 2013. CWB Holdings, Inc. was initially formed under the Colorado Business Corporation Act ("CBCA") under the name Stanley Brothers Social Enterprises, LLC, and on June 19, 2015, changed its name to CWB Holdings, LLC. On December 30, 2015, it converted from a limited liability company to a corporation pursuant to Colorado law and changed its name to CWB Holdings, Inc. On August 30, 2018, CWB Holdings, Inc. merged into Stanley Brothers, Inc. and the resulting entity, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc., changed its name to Charlotte's Web, Inc.
On August 30, 2018, the Company announced the closing of its initial public offering and secondary offering of its Common Shares at a price of C$7.00 per Common Share for total gross proceeds of C$115,115,000. Charlotte’s Web sold 13,312,150 Common Shares under the initial public offering ("IPO"), for total gross proceeds to the Company of C$93,185,050, while certain selling Shareholders under the IPO sold an aggregate of 3,132,850 Common Shares, for total gross proceeds to the selling Shareholders of C$21,929,950.
On March 23, 2020, the Company announced it had entered into an arrangement (the "Arrangement Agreement") with Abacus Health Products ("Abacus"), pursuant to which the Company proposed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding subordinate voting shares of
3
Abacus (the "Abacus Shares"). Under the terms of the Arrangement Agreement, Shareholders of Abacus would receive 0.85 of a Common Share for each Abacus Share held. Effective as of June 11, 2020, the Company and Abacus completed the arrangement (the "Arrangement") pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement and the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding Abacus Shares. Upon completion of the Arrangement, Abacus became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Financial year ended December 31, 2022
On January 4, 2022, the Company’s Board designated Jared Stanley, the Company’s Chief Cultivation and Innovation Officer, as an executive officer of the Company.
On January 12, 2022, the Company announced the completion of a reorganization of the corporate structure and a movement to a horizontal organizational structure to empower employees with increased decision making and accountability.
On February 1, 2022, the Company's Board appointed Andrés de Gortari as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company. Mr. de Gortari joined the Company in July 2021 as the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Accounting.
On March 9, 2022, the Company announced that the Charlotte's Web line of CBD Gummies has been named Product of the Year for 2022. Product of the Year is the largest consumer-voted award for product innovation, determined by 40,000 American shoppers through a national survey conducted by Kantar, a global leader in consumer research.
On April 25, 2022, the Company announced the departure of Wes Booysen as its Chief Financial & Operating Officer and the appointments of Lindsey Jensen as the Chief Financial officer and Jared Stanley as the Chief Operating officer.
On June 2, 2022, the Company and Jared Stanley, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, entered into an offer letter memorializing the terms of Mr. Stanley’s service as Chief Operating Officer.
On June 20, 2022, the Company announced the appointment of Gregory A. Gould, as the Company’s Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administration Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, replacing former Chief Financial Officer, Lindsey Jensen, who notified the Company of her intended resignation from the Company, effective July 8, 2022.
Following the Company's annual general Shareholders' meeting on June 22, 2022, the elected Board of Directors were Jacques Tortoroli (Chief Executive Officer), John Held, Jean Birch, Tim Saunders, and Susan Vogt.
On July 27, 2022, the Company entered into a payoff letter with J.P. Morgan to voluntarily terminate all commitments and obligations under the Company's credit agreement with J.P. Morgan (the "Credit Agreement"), with termination effective as of July 27, 2022. In connection with the execution of the payoff letter, the Company paid J.P. Morgan approximately $20,000 in commitment fees and legal fees and expenses. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement at the time the Company entered into the payoff letter or at the time of termination.
Effective as of July 31, 2022, the Company entered into an Extension and Second Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement (the "First Extension Agreement") with Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company ("Licensor"). Pursuant to the First Extension Agreement, the term of the Name and Likeness and License Agreement dated August 1, 2018 between the Company and Licensor, as amended by the Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness Agreement effective April 16, 2021, was extended from July 31, 2022 to August 31, 2022.
Effective August 2, 2022, the Company entered into an amendment (the "Amendment") to the offer of employment, dated December 16, 2021, with Jacques Tortoroli, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company. Pursuant to the Amendment, Mr. Tortoroli's annual base salary and grants under the Company’s 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan were adjusted to better align with those of the Shareholders of the Company.
Effective August 10, 2022, the board of directors of the Company, appointed Thomas Lardieri to the Company's board of directors. Mr. Lardieri's appointment to the Company’s board of directors was effective immediately.
4
Effective as of August 31, 2022, the Company entered into an Extension and Third Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement (the "Second Extension Agreement") with Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company ("Licensor"). Pursuant to the Second Extension Agreement, the term of the Name and Likeness and License Agreement dated August 1, 2018 between the Company and Licensor, as amended by the Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness Agreement effective April 16, 2021, was extended from August 31, 2022 to September 30, 2022.
On September 1, 2022, the Company moved its corporate headquarters from 1801 California Street, Suite 4800, Denver, Colorado 80202 to its existing office space located at 700 Tech Court, Louisville, Colorado 80027.
Effective as of September 30, 2022, the Company entered into an Extension and Fourth Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement (the "Fourth Extension Agreement") with Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company ("Licensor"). Pursuant to the Fourth Extension Agreement, the term of the Name and Likeness and License Agreement dated August 1, 2018 between the Company and Licensor, as amended by the Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness Agreement effective April 16, 2021 (as amended, the "Name and Likeness Agreement"), was extended from September 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022. Additionally, the Name and Likeness Agreement was also amended to provide the payment of a Company event fee of $1,500 per diem for each Stanley brother that, at the request of the Company’s chief executive officer, participates in any of the following events: (i) customer meetings; (ii) strategic partner meetings; (iii) speaking engagements; (iv) presentations; (v) social media postings; (vi) podcasts; (vi) public relations events; (vii) media interviews; (viii) trade show appearances; and (ix) events substantively similar to any of the foregoing.
On October 11, 2022, Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") entered into a Promotional Rights Agreement (the "MLB Promotional Rights Agreement") with MLB Advanced Media L.P., on its own behalf and on behalf of Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, The MLB Network, LLC and the Major League Baseball Clubs (collectively, the "MLB"), pursuant to which the Company entered into an exclusive strategic partnership with MLB to promote the Company’s new NSF Certified for Sport® product line. In consideration for the MLB Promotional Rights Agreement, the Company pays MLB over the term of the MLB Promotional Rights Agreement, a promotional rights fee and a royalty on the Company’s gross revenue from MLB branded products of the Company sold after prior sales of all such branded products exceed $18.0 million. The Company also entered into a subscription agreement (the "Subscription Agreement") pursuant to which the Company issued to MLB Common Shares equal to four percent (4%) of the Company’s fully diluted outstanding Common Shares (such Common Shares, the "MLB Shares"). The total number of MLB Shares issued to MLB was 6,119,121 common shares of the Company, issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. The Company did not receive any proceeds in respect of the MLB Shares.
Effective as of November 1, 2022, the Company entered into a Manufacturing and Sales License Agreement with Aphria, Inc., an Ontario corporation and an affiliate of Tilray Brands, Inc. ("Tilray"), providing for a strategic alliance between the Company and Tilray, pursuant to which Tilray has the rights to licensing, manufacturing, quality, marketing and distribution of Charlotte’s WebTM CBD hemp extract products in Canada.
Effective as of November 14, 2022, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with BT DE Investments, Inc. a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAT Group (LSE: BATS and NYSE: BTI), providing for the issuance of an approximately US$56.8 million (C$75.3 million) convertible debenture that is convertible into 19.9% ownership of Common Shares at a conversion price of C$2.00 per Common Share of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX").
Effective December 6, 2022, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Alicia Morga to the Company’s board of directors. Ms. Morga’s appointment to the Company’s board of directors was effective immediately following the departure of Jean Birch, who notified the Company and the board of directors of her retirement from the board of directors, which the Company’s board of directors accepted.
On December 19, 2022, the Company announced the departure of Greg Gould as the Chief Financial Officer and the subsequent appointment of Ms. Jessica Saxton to the position of Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer effective January 1, 2023.
Financial Year Ended December 31, 2023
Effective as of February 22, 2023, the Company entered into an Extension and Fifth Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement (the "Fourth Extension Agreement") with Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado
5
limited liability company ("Licensor"). Pursuant to the Fourth Extension Agreement, the term of the Name and Likeness and License Agreement dated August 1, 2018 between the Company and Licensor, as amended by the Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness Agreement effective April 16, 2021, was extended to June 30, 2023.
Effective March 14, 2023, Jonathan Atwood was appointed as the designee to the board of directors by BT DE Investments Inc., pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement between the Company and BT DE Investments Inc., dated November 14, 2022. The Investor Rights Agreement was entered into by the Company and BT DE Investments Inc. in connection with the Company’s issuance of the $56.8 million debenture to BT DE Investments Inc. and permits BT DE Investments Inc. to appoint up to 20% of the members of the Company's Board of Directors.
Effective March 30, 2023, the Company entered into an amendment to the offer of employment, dated December 19, 2022, with Jessica Saxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Pursuant to the amendment, Ms. Saxton’s relocation reimbursement was increased from $40,000 to $45,000, she was provided a 12-month housing assistance allowance of $1,500 per month through March 31, 2024, and she was provided a vehicle assistance allowance of $1,120 per month through January 31, 2025.
On April 6, 2023, the Company issued a press release announcing the formation of an entity with AJNA BioSciences PBC ("AJNA"), and a subsidiary of British American Tobacco PLC (LSE: BATS and NYSE: BTI) ("BAT") for the purpose of clinical development of a novel hemp botanical Investigational New Drug application.
On June 13, 2023, the Company issued a press release, responding to a letter and subsequent press release issued by Joel and Jesse Stanley regarding the replacement of a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company.
The Company announced on June 20, 2023 that following the 2023 annual general meeting ("AGM"), the Board of Directors of the Company was comprised of John Held, Jonathan Atwood, Thomas Lardieri, Alicia Morga, Jacques Tortoroli, and Susan Vogt. The Company announced that certain of the directors received less than majority support at the AGM and that each such director complied with the Company's majority voting policy and provided an offer to resign to the Board.
Effective as of June 30, 2023, the Company entered into an Extension and Sixth Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement with Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company. Pursuant to the extension, the term of the Name and Likeness and License Agreement was extended to December 31, 2023.
Effective August 28, 2023, the Company appointed Sarah Cambridge as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company.
On September 13, 2023, the Company issued a press release announcing the appointment of Mr. Morachnick as Chief Executive Officer, effective as September 13, 2023 and the departure of Mr. Tortoroli as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Director. The Company also announced the rejection of the offers to resign of John Held, Thomas Lardieri, Alicia Morga and Jacques Tortoroli that had been offered pursuant to the Company’s Majority Voting Policy.
Effective October 11, 2023, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Angela McElwee to the Company’s Board of Directors.
Effective December 28, 2023, the Company entered into an amendment to extend until November 13, 2024, the maturity date of a secured promissory note, as lender, where the Company loaned $1,000,000 to one of the Stanley Brothers.
Financial Year Ending December 31, 2024
On February 5, 2024, the Company and MLB entered into an amendment to the MLB Promotional Rights Agreement, whereby the term of the MLB Promotional Rights Agreement was extended through December 31, 2027, with an aggregate rights fee of $23 million for the remainder of the term.
Effective as of February 1, 2024, the Company accelerated the vesting and settlement of outstanding restricted stock units ("RSU’s") granted under the Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. Amended 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan for the Company’s Principal Financial Officer, Jessica Saxton, Chief Financial Officer, and certain of its named executive officers, Stephen Rogers and Jared Stanley.
6
Effective February 6, 2024, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Matthew McCarthy to the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. McCarthy’s appointment to the Company's Board of Directors followed the departure of Susan Vogt, who notified the Company and the Board of Directors of her immediate retirement from the Board of Directors.
Effective February 12, 2024, the Company and DeFloria, Inc. entered into a Master Services Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will be compensated for the provision of certain services to DeFloria, Inc.
On April 29, 2024, the Company announced that John Held, Thomas Lardieri, and Alicia Morga will not stand for re-election at the Company's 2024 Annual General and Special Meeting.
On June 14, 2024, the Company announced that following the 2024 annual general meeting, the Board of Directors of the Company was comprised of Angela McElwee, Jonathan Atwood, Matthew McCarthy, Bill Morachnick, Jared Stanley, and Maureen Usifer.
On June 18, 2024, the Company announced the departure of Jessica Saxton and the appointment of Erika Lind as Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
On August 21, 2024, the Company announced the appointment of PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP and the dismissal of Ernst & Young as the Company's independent registered accounting firm.
On September 24, 2024, the Company announced emergency regulations enacted in the State of California.
On November 1, 2024, the Company announced that it had entered into a retention agreement with Erika Lind, the Company's Chief Financial Officer.
Financial Year Ending December 31, 2025
On January 17, 2025, the Company announced the departure of Sarah Cambridge as the Company's Principle Accounting Officer and that Erika Lind, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, would also assume the role of Principal Accounting Officer for the Company.
On February 24, 2025, the Company announced that DeFloria, Inc. received notification from the FDA which allows DeFloria to proceed with Phase 2 human clinical trials.
Business of the Company
Business Objectives and Strategy
The Company is a market leader in the production and distribution of innovative hemp-derived wellness products. Through its substantially vertically integrated business model, the Company strives to improve customers’ lives and meet their demands for stringent product quality and consistency.
Charlotte’s Web’s mission is to unearth the science of nature to revolutionize wellness. The Company does this primarily by growing its proprietary non-GMO hemp genetics on family farms that are made into premium, full-spectrum phytocannabinoid health and wellness products. Charlotte’s Web products are manufactured both in-house and at third-party certified FDA-registered facilities.
The above statements capture the essence of the Company’s business strategy and the pioneering vision of its founders. The Company strives to realize significant growth by expanding further into the health and wellness sector, while capitalizing on the Company’s unique differentiators to create sustainable value. In 2024 the Company expanded its product portfolio with the introduction of hemp-free functional mushroom gummies. In accordance with the Company’s social responsibility goals, Charlotte’s Web supports several non-profit organizations that utilize its products or that further consumer education, advocacy, and research in the hemp, CBD and wellness marketplaces.
7
Industry Overview
The Company’s primary products are made from high quality and proprietary strains of whole-plant hemp extracts containing a full spectrum of phytocannabinoids, including naturally occurring CBD. Full-spectrum hemp extracts ("FSHE") are produced from hemp. The Company does not produce or sell medicinal or recreational marijuana or products derived from high-THC marijuana plants.
Historically, the health and wellness benefits of hemp-based products focused on protein and nutritional oil content. Hemp seeds are known to provide both protein and valuable omega fatty acids. However, beginning with the publication of United States Patent No. 6,630,507 (cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuro-protectants) issued to the United States Department of Health and Human Services on October 7, 2003, consumer interest surrounding the health and wellness benefits of cannabinoids grew significantly. This interest continued until the passage of 2014 Farm Bill, which created a path for institutions of higher education and state departments of agriculture to cultivate hemp for research purposes under certain conditions.
Hemp extracts contain an assortment of naturally-occurring substances, including phytocannabinoids, terpenes, flavonoids and other hemp compounds. The Company believes the presence of various phytocannabinoids, terpenes and flavonoids work synergistically to heighten the effects of the products, making full-spectrum and broad-spectrum hemp extracts superior and distinctly different to single-compound CBD isolates. This assortment of hemp compounds is the basis for the theory known as the "entourage effect" as introduced by Israeli chemists, Shimon Ben-Shabat and Raphael Mechoulam, in 1998.
Although research regarding the potential therapeutic uses of CBD and FSHE continues to evolve, industry reports suggest consumers are using CBD for various applications including assistance with sleep, daily stress, anxiety, pain relief, cognitive function and immune health, among other applications.
Product Overview
Product Portfolio The Company offers a mix of products that have been strategically developed to fit with its objective of delivering a full suite of best-in-class FSHE wellness products that meet its customers’ demands for stringent quality and consistency. The Company currently markets its products under the "Charlotte’s Web", "CBD CLINIC", and "CBD MEDIC" trade names. The Company’s current product categories include human ingestible products (tinctures, capsules, and gummies), topicals, pet products, and NSF Certified for Sport® broad-spectrum products.
Tinctures A human ingestible liquid product is a combination of oil and full-spectrum hemp extracts containing naturally occurring CBD. Ingestible liquid products are delivered in either coconut-based medium chain triglyceride ("MCT") oil or olive oil, in some cases with flavor. Liquid products are meant to be consumed by direct ingestion.
Capsules Ingestible capsule products have standardized amounts of FSHE. Original capsule products were in the form of a dry powder, inside a hard-capsule shell. In 2019, Charlotte's Web innovated its capsule offering, introducing liquid capsules. Ingredients in liquid capsules include carrier oil (extra-virgin organic olive oil) and FSHE. The capsules are constructed with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, which reduces oxidation to naturally extend shelf life and maintain the integrity of the high-quality ingredients. Capsule products are meant to be consumed by direct ingestion.
Gel Caps In 2024 Charlotte’s Web introduced its new Soft Gel Capsule, offering easy-to-swallow gel caps that provide precise, potent dosing of full-spectrum CBD. The ingestible gel caps are designed for portability, convenience, and effectiveness.
Gummies The Company’s FSHE gummies are made from whole-plant hemp extract and nutraceutical blends and are flavored with natural juices. The product is meant to be consumed by direct ingestion.
Topicals The Company’s topical products are delivered in cream, balm, gel, roll-on, ointment, other cosmetic type forms. These products are combinations of hemp, plant-based oils, herbal extracts and other ingredients. Topical products are meant to be applied externally and by topical application.
Pet The Company's pet products are currently intended for canine use. Ingestible pet products are delivered in liquid (drops) and solid (chew) forms. Ingredients are a combination of oil and FSHE. Liquid canine products are delivered in coconut-based MCT oil with or without flavor. The liquid and solid products are meant to be consumed by direct ingestion.
8
Mushrooms Gummies The Company's new line of adaptogenic mushroom gummies is formulated with high-quality mushrooms and functional botanicals for direct ingestion. These products are hemp-free and expand the Company's commitment to providing effective science supported plant-based wellness solutions.
Key Competitive Advantages of Product Offering
In addition to Charlotte’s Web brand and substantial goodwill generated from the Company’s legislative efforts and media exposure, the Company believes the following are also competitive advantages of the Company:
a.Cultivation Experience and Capacity — With years of experience in plant cultivation, the Company has selected prime farmland to grow its hemp with access to substantial additional farmland for future capacity. In addition to third-party cultivation in Canada, the Company is exploring additional international cultivation and distribution opportunities. The Company believes there is no other entity in the world with more experience bringing large-scale, hemp-based operations to the market while maintaining impeccable product quality.
b.Industry-leading Manufacturing Capability — Charlotte's Web leases a 136,610-square-foot industrial building located in Louisville, Colorado, which houses its primary production and R&D divisions. This facility is staffed with professional personnel responsible for production management, quality control/assurance, analytical chemistry, product development and process engineering to ensure product quality.
c.Control of Supply Chain — The Company is substantially vertically-integrated and maintains control over its proprietary genetics throughout the entire cultivation and extraction processes — from seed/clone to packaged products. The Company currently uses select contract manufacturers for gummies, topicals, pet and capsules who manufacture products according to the Company’s specifications and standards. Some companies in the CBD industry produce their products from imported hemp pastes of unknown origin, quality, and purity.
d.Rigid Quality Management System — The Company has implemented a rigid quality management system that includes documented internal quality processes and both internal testing laboratories as well as independent third-party testing laboratories.
e.Proprietary Genetics — The Company has been granted U.S. and Canadian Utility Patents for its hemp genetics. The Company has earned a total of six U.S. Utility Patents and five Canadian Utility Patent covering hemp varieties as it advances the science of hemp horticulture. The Company believes that the positive media exposure surrounding its proprietary strains have made Charlotte’s Web one of the most sought-after brands in the emerging hemp and CBD markets.
f.Protection of Intangible Assets — The ownership and protection of the Company's intellectual property is a significant aspect of the Company’s future success. Currently the Company protects its intangible assets through trade secrets, technical know-how, and proprietary information. The Company protects its intellectual property by seeking and obtaining registered protection (including patents and trademarks) where possible, developing and implementing standard operating procedures and entering into agreements with parties that have access to the Company's inventions, trade secrets, technical know-how and proprietary information such as business partners, collaborators, employees, and consultants, to protect the Company’s confidentiality and ownership of its intellectual property. The Company also seeks to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of its inventions, trade secrets, trademarks, technical know-how, and proprietary information by maintaining physical security of the Company’s premises and physical and electronic security of the Company’s information technology systems.
The Company has sought trademark and patent protection in the United States, Canada and other countries. The Company’s patent portfolio (patents and patent applications) covers, among other things, the Company’s plant genetics, extraction and cannabinoid isolation, and conversion processes and designs. There can be no guarantee, however, that the Company’s efforts to secure trademark or patent protection will be successful. The duration of the protection afforded by the Company’s registered intellectual property varies by the nature of the registration, but the Company manages renewals and notices on an on-going basis to ensure that the Company’s intellectual property is protected to the full extent possible under applicable law. See Item 1A - "Risk Factors – Risks Relating to the Company's Business and Industry – The Company's intellectual property may be difficult to protect."
9
g.Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights — The Company requires employees and third parties to sign non-disclosure agreements prior to receiving any of the Company’s confidential information. Employees are also required to sign proprietary rights agreements regarding intellectual property they create for the Company. The Company uses standard precautions to protect confidentiality, including physical and electronic security measures.
Cultivation The Company's proven cultivation practices have been engineered for scalability to meet long-term sales demand projections. The Company has conducted extensive development over the past several years to demonstrate that it can scale its cultivation operations significantly without sacrificing quality and consistency.
The Company has established infrastructure across multiple states in order to diversify the seed supply and maintain hemp biomass consistency through standardized mechanization. If needed, the Company believes it will be able to continue to rapidly scale cultivation by: (i) expanding cultivation sites; (ii) diversifying cultivation geographies to extend growing seasons and mitigate crop risk; (iii) increase seed production capabilities; and (iv) further mechanizing cultivation processes to ensure that raw material demand is satisfied without sacrificing quality and consistency.
The Company maintains title to its hemp plants throughout the growing process. The Company grows its hemp plants outdoors on farms and is therefore subject to seasonal weather patterns in North America. The seeds or propagation are typically planted in the May-June timeframe and have no CBD content until September. The plants are then typically completely harvested and processed by the end of November of each year.
Cultivation Overview The Company has grown its proprietary hemp plants in Arizona, Colorado, Kentucky, and Canada on owned and/or leased farmland operated by the Company or third-party farming operators. The Company is actively involved in all aspects of genetics development, propagation, seed production, cultivation, and harvesting. All hemp cultivation activities are done under the oversight of, and licensed by, each state’s Department of Agriculture, or Health Canada, each of which rigorously tests the Company’s crops to ensure compliance with each department’s hemp programs (including THC content of less than 0.3% on a dry weight basis). The Company and its third-party farming operators are in compliance with the regulations as outlined by Health Canada and each applicable Department of Agriculture and all hemp produced and sold by the Company constitutes hemp under the 2018 Farm Bill, as well as the laws of the states in which it produces and sells such hemp.
Cultivation Research & Development Since its first crop production in 2014, the Company has taken a leadership position in advancing the technology surrounding all aspects of hemp production. The Company’s R&D efforts are being driven both by the increasing demand for the Company’s products and its desire to create an expanded portfolio of products that serve the customers’ needs.
Breeding Division The breeding division's main purpose is to expand the Company’s proprietary hemp variety portfolio. This allows for successful cultivation expansion in both US and international markets, as well as creating innovative cannabinoid development for expanded product development. The breeding program has six variety patents, including two hemp hybrid varieties with proven disease resistance and increased yield which lowers cultivation costs of production. In addition to hybrid development, the division oversees the Company’s seed production and supply, import/export requirements, R&D hemp regulatory compliance, assists in state and federal legislative efforts and supports cultivation operations.
Harvesting Harvesting continues to be a significant challenge in the broader hemp industry with current practices following the processes of the tobacco industry. Once the plants are harvested from the fields, they are hung upside down in outdoor dry structures. The dried plants are then further processed off the plant stalk for final storage. If processed at the correct moisture content, the shelf life of the harvested plants is proven to remain stable for at least four years. However, this method of drying creates scalability issues and can also cause potency loss in the raw material. With this harvesting process, there are limitations applicable to both available infrastructures and labor in agricultural regions. To mitigate these challenges, the Company has focused its Arizona, Colorado, Kentucky, and Canada cultivation teams on the development of new, more scalable processes to mechanize harvesting without sacrificing quality. The Company has successfully scaled the harvesting and drying process and believes it has enough capacity to meet the Company’s needs.
Manufacturing The Company’s manufacturing operations are centered around the quality of its products and the efficiency of their production. The Company has proprietary extraction processes currently in use and is developing the next generation of processes and equipment to serve the Company’s expanding production requirements and product offerings. The Company operates its finished products manufacturing in accordance with cGMP to create high quality products in the market.
10
In 2020, the Company began operating from the LOFT, its 136,610-square foot manufacturing and extraction, warehouse, and distribution facility. The LOFT has been constructed using state of the art processes and equipment to deliver superior products to the Company’s customers. The facility efficiently executes the Company’s core competencies in R&D, product development, quality control, tincture manufacturing and filling, and product delivery. The Company also expects to begin manufacturing gummy and topical products at the LOFT in 2025. The Company believes it has sufficient capabilities to meet its core production requirements over the long term. The facility also has been designed to accommodate incremental manufacturing capacity as business needs require, including the strategic in-sourcing of contract manufactured products beyond tinctures.
Arrangements with Suppliers and Manufacturers The Company currently contracts key parts of supply chain management, including manufacturing, production, and packaging for non-proprietary aspects of its manufacturing process for certain of its products. These large-scale manufacturers reduce the reliance on internal manufacturing resources and allow for rapid scaling of production on an as needed basis.
Extraction and Product Formulation The Company’s harvested hemp is delivered to the Company’s production facility in a coarse-ground form. At the facility, the extraction processes do not commence until the raw hemp material passes initial screenings for moisture content and toxic mold by-products (aflatoxins). Upon passing these screenings, the raw hemp material passes through one of two different extraction processes. The Company utilizes both Carbon Dioxide super critical fluid extraction ("SFE") and Alcohol Extraction ("AE") processes. These two processes and the resultant extracts have differing phytochemical profiles, which appeal to different customer bases.
After processing, both the SFE and AE extracts are rigorously batch tested both internally and by third-party laboratories for cannabinoid potency, residual solvents, heavy metals, and pesticides. After passing these quality control tests, both the SFE and AE extracts are released into finished products production, where they are diluted with carrier food oils, either medium chain triglycerides from coconut oil or olive oil, or otherwise added to the Company’s products, including the chews or topical products. Some of the SFE extract is dedicated to capsule production.
The Company’s topical, chews, and liquid products are currently blended, flavored, filled, labeled, and packaged into consumer cartons at either its production facility or at contract manufacturer facilities. The Company is continuously working to qualify additional third-party contract manufacturers to ensure adequate encapsulation, bottling, and packaging capabilities necessary to meet demand for the Company’s products.
Quality Management Systems In 2020, the Company was the first hemp extract company to receive an NSF certification. NSF International’s dietary supplements certification is a globally recognized standard that establishes requirements for the ingredients in dietary and nutritional supplements and is considered the gold standard for products in the dietary supplement space. In October 2022, Charlotte’s Web SPORT – Daily Edge, became the first broad-spectrum hemp-derived tincture to be Certified for Sport® by NSF. NSF's Certified for Sport® program verifies that products do not contain unsafe levels of contaminants, prohibited substances or masking agents, and that what is on the label matches what is in the product. The Certified for Sport® certification is the only independent third-party certification program recognized by Major League Baseball©.
Additionally, in January 2022, the Company was the first hemp extract company to achieve International Organization for Standardization ("ISO") 17025 certification. This certifies that the Company meets the technical and quality benchmarks by ISO 17025 for analytical chemistry testing methods.
The Company employs cGMP at each stage of its production. cGMP refers to the current Good Manufacturing Practices regulations enforced by the FDA.1 Adherence to cGMP regulations assures the identity, strength, quality, purity, and composition of products by requiring that manufacturers adequately design, monitor, and control manufacturing operations. This includes establishing strong quality management systems, obtaining appropriate quality raw materials, establishing comprehensive standard operating procedures, detecting and investigating product quality deviations and maintaining reliable testing practices. This formal system of controls helps in preventing instances of contamination, deviations, failures, and errors. This ensures products manufactured under cGMP meet quality standards.
The Company’s products meet regulatory guidelines for contaminants and are tested by independent third-party laboratories. Products are tested for, among other items: identity, potency, residual solvents, microbial contaminants, aflatoxin, heavy metals, and pesticides.
1 See 21 C.F.R. Part 111.
11
To create the highest quality products, the Company, when applicable, closely controls every step in the production process, including propagation, cultivation, harvesting, drying, manufacturing, and packaging. The control and visibility maintained through the Company’s substantial vertical integration allows for the continual monitoring and refinement of critical processes, resulting in high quality standardized products.
Sales and Distribution Strategy The Company’s products are distributed through its e-commerce website (www.charlottesweb.com), third-party e-commerce websites, select distributors, health practitioners, and a variety of brick-and-mortar retailers across multiple channels of business. The Company’s products are sold in chiropractic and doctors’ offices, gyms, massage therapy offices, salons, direct delivery services, and pet stores.
The Company distributes its products within the United States and in select international markets through local or regional distribution partners. Retail distribution strategy is focused on gaining broad distribution within the natural channel and conventional food and mass market ("FDM") retailers.
The Company believes broad brand recognition and increasing market demand in the adaptogenic supplements category (where CBD is typically positioned) results in strong brand sales, which helps promote increased category development and new account acquisition. The Company believes these accounts will enable it to achieve broader distribution, opening new consumer segments and driving growth by increasing awareness, consideration, and purchase. The Company believes it is leading the way in the category by opening conventional channels that have historically been resistant to place CBD items on their shelves. Key to this success has been the relationships and partnerships with key natural accounts.
The Company continues to sell its CBD CLINIC products into the practitioner market comprised of naturopathies, chiropractors, acupuncturists, physical and massage therapists, and functional practitioners, and continues to expand the total number of health care practitioners in the CBD CLINIC network. The market for the CBD CLINIC products is primarily served through national distributors. The Company believes that it can continue to capture and increase its market share in this market by increasing its sales and marketing efforts targeted at this market.
The Company’s sales are executed through customized strategies depending on the retail verticals. For example, in specialty food accounts, a combination of sales brokers and distributors are strategically located within geographical markets. Depending on the size of the account, some locations are deemed to be "national accounts" that receive additional support from the Company’s internal sales team. This allows the Company’s brokers and distributors to manage multiple independent specialty food locations, while still achieving the same level of support that is expected by the Company’s larger chain retail customers.
The Company utilizes e-commerce to reach consumers and guide them through the hemp and CBD buying process. The Company believes consumers rely heavily on digital research. Key to this approach is the ability to access consumers organically who are searching the web for "CBD" or "Charlotte’s Web" both on the Company's website as well as through linking from reliable providers of content and education. The Company’s website delivers on this through high levels of product purchase and engagement via opting into the Company’s email newsletter subscription. This indicates a higher level of interest in educational resources and product knowledge.
Currently, orders are fulfilled through a LOFT fulfillment center located in Louisville, Colorado, and the use of third-party logistics providers.
Marketing and Promotion The Company benefits from an authentic origination story linked to its first consumer served, Charlotte Figi. The story of how Charlotte’s mom, Paige Figi, desperately reached out to the Stanley Brothers seeking an alternative solution for her daughter’s wellness was captured and broadcasted in a CNN documentary by Dr. Sanjay Gupta.
Data collection and customer analysis from e-commerce sales continues to be a significant component of the Company’s marketing strategy. Direct-to-consumer e-commerce sales give an unprecedented opportunity to gain meaningful insight into how to better support the customer based on data including buying habits, purchase frequency, and in many cases, why the product is being used.
The Company has a subscription program. Through its subscription program, the Company utilizes a discount structure to encourage enrollment with a similar structure to online "subscribe and save" models. This is expected to deliver upside demand and repeat purchases from existing customers by enabling scheduled reorders and improved continuity in consumption.
12
The Company continues to promote the awareness of its brands through investment in marketing programs, sponsorships and continued participation in events that offer wide exposure to both trade partners and consumer retail markets. For example, the Company currently has a category exclusive sponsorship arrangement with Major League Baseball©.
Growth from the Existing Product Portfolio Through Marketing Initiatives
The Company’s marketing mix strives to connect with audiences and the consumer journey through:
•Paid, earned, and affiliate media to build awareness of the sector and the unique qualities of the Company’s brand equity and products
•Search engine optimization ("SEO") and email marketing to drive consumer purchase and subscriptions on charlottesweb.com, the Company’s e-commerce platform
•Partnerships and affiliates that reach expanded consumer segments
•Public relations campaigns and events to amplify targeted social and media marketing communications
•Trade marketing to increase visibility and differentiation of the Company's products in customer stores
•Word of mouth and referrals from health care practitioners, their colleagues, and patients
•Event marketing and support of various social responsibility initiatives
Competition The Company is substantially vertically integrated from seed to packaged product, which helps ensure product quality. Being substantially vertically integrated and focusing on quality and standardization creates an important competitive differentiator for the Company, as the majority of its competitors are not substantially vertically integrated. The Company's knowledge of hemp cultivation, combined with its scientific and financial resources, allow it to maintain a strong market position amongst its competitors.
The Company's principal competitors in the CBD wellness products space include companies such as, Medterra, SUNMED, Global Widget, CBD American Shaman, CBDfx, Wyld and PlusCBD.
Information Systems The Company's primary enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system is a cloud-based system well-known for manufacturing, shipping, and receiving, inventory control, supply chain management, sales, accounting, and finance. In addition to this centralized ERP system, supplemental peripheral software applications are used for specialized activities in finance, human resources, customer support, manufacturing, distribution, and marketing.
Intellectual Property The Company's intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to its business. In efforts to secure, maintain, and protect its intellectual and proprietary rights, the Company relies on a combination of patent, trademark, trade secret, trade dress and other rights in the United States and Canada. The Company also has confidentiality and/or license agreements with certain employees, contractors and other third parties, which limit access to and use of the Company's proprietary intellectual property.
Effective January 5, 2023, the Company entered into a Brand License and Option Agreement ("License Agreement") with JMS Brands LLC, an entity owned by Jesse Stanley. Pursuant to the Brand License and Option Agreement, the Company licensed certain intellectual property from JMS Brands LLC, for an annual license fee of $500,000. On January 5, 2024, the License Agreement expired.
The Company currently has a portfolio of pending U.S. plant, utility and design patent applications directed to Charlotte's Web’s most promising plant genetics, proprietary extraction technology, cannabinoid isolation methods and cannabinoid conversion processes and industrial designs. The Company also has pending U.S. and Canadian trademark applications.
The Company now has earned a total of six U.S. Utility Patents covering hemp varieties as it advances the science of hemp horticulture. The Company also has five Canadian Utility Patents covering the 'CW1AS1','Lindorea', 'Kirsche', 'AF15B15-21', and ‘EM15B2A170' hemp varieties.
13
For each of the Company’s material patents, the chart below identifies (i) the patent, (ii) the type of intellectual property ("IP") subject to the patent, (iii) the jurisdiction where the patent is held, (iv) the title of the patent, (v) the inventor(s) and assignee(s), and (vi) the status of the patent. The patents listed below expire between 2039 and 2042, and cover novel hemp strains used or with potential use in Company products, or for other commercialization opportunities.
Patent / Publication Type of IP / Jurisdiction | Title / Inventor(s) / Assignee (s) | Status / Comments | ||||||
US 11,666,016 2023-06-06 Utility - United States | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'AF14B15-21' Campbell, Brian CHARLOTTE'S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'AF14B15-21' hemp line. | ||||||
US 10,653,085 2020-05-19 Utility - United States | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'CW1AS1' Stanley, Joel Reel, Keri CHARLOTTE'S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'CW1AS1' hemp line. | ||||||
US 10,736,295 2020-08-11 Utility - United States | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'CW1AS1' Stanley, Joel Reel, Keri CHARLOTTE'S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'CW1AS1' hemp line. | ||||||
US 10,888,059 2021-01-12 Utility- United States | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'LINDOREA' Reel, Keri CHARLOTTE’S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'LINDOREA' hemp line. . | ||||||
US 10,888,060 2021-01-12 Utility- United States | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'KIRSCHE' Reel, Keri CHARLOTTE’S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'KIRSCHE' hemp line. | ||||||
US 11,503,787 2022-11-22 Utility- United States | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'EM15B2A170' Campbell, Brian CHARLOTTE’S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'EM15B2A170' hemp line. | ||||||
14
Patent / Publication Type of IP / Jurisdiction | Title / Inventor(s) / Assignee (s) | Status / Comments | ||||||
CA 3,101,952 2022-01-25 Utility- Canada | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'CW1AS1' Stanley, Joel Reel, Keri CHARLOTTE’S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'CW1AS1' hemp line. . | ||||||
CA 3,169,404 2023-02-07 Utility- Canada | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'LINDOREA' Reel, Keri CHARLOTTE’S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'LINDOREA' hemp line. . | ||||||
CA 3,169,446 2023-03-07 Utility- Canada | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'KIRSCHE' Reel, Keri CHARLOTTE’S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'KIRSCHE' hemp line. | ||||||
CA 3,155,121 2023-01-31 Utility- Canada | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'AF14B15-21' Campbell, Brian CHARLOTTE’S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'AF14B15-21' hemp line. | ||||||
CA 3,157,865 2023-02-07 Utility- Canada | HEMP PLANT NAMED 'EM15B2A170' Campbell, Brian CHARLOTTE’S WEB, INC. | ISSUED Related Technologies: •Protection for 'EM15B2A170' hemp line. | ||||||
The Company is subject to certain risks related to its intellectual property. For more information, see "Risk Factors –Risks Relating to the Company's Business and Industry – The Company’s intellectual property may be difficult to protect."
Employees and Human Capital As of December 31, 2024, the Company had 112 full time employees. Of these employees, 11 were employed in manufacturing operations positions, 16 were employed in sales and marketing positions, 78 were employed in general, quality, and administrative positions, 3 were employed in cultivation positions, and the remaining 4 employees were engaged in R&D aspects of the business.
The Company believes it has an advantage in attracting employees with its purpose-based mission, B-Corp status, and its leadership position in the industry, and prides itself in attracting, retaining and developing individuals with complementary mix of professional experiences and industry knowledge. The Company values diversity in culture, race, and sexual differences and that employees may realize their professional goals through development programs and mentoring.
The Company has assembled a management team with significant professional expertise in distribution, cultivation, sales, science, intellectual property, technology, finance, customer service, consumer packaged goods ("CPG"), marketing, business development,
15
acquisitions, capital markets and market analysis. The Company’s management team includes executives with many years of experience in their respective fields. See "Risk Factors – Risks Relating to the Company's Business and Industry – The Company depends on key personnel and its ability to attract and retain employees."
Third-Party Suppliers, Service Providers and Distribution Although the Company is substantially vertically integrated, the Company obtains certain input components, such as packaging components, flavors, and certain raw materials, from third-party suppliers. None of the third-party suppliers are considered to be material to the business on a standalone basis and all supply input components are readily available from other suppliers in the market.
If any given supplier or distributor is lost in a specific region, the Company believes these could be replaced without material disruption as it could contract with multiple alternative suppliers or distributors to provide the requisite service(s) and product(s). The Company is a substantially vertically integrated company that performs its own manufacturing for proprietary elements in the manufacturing process. The Company utilizes contract manufacturers for non-proprietary elements in its manufacturing process such as bottling and packaging. The Company manages risks that are associated with third-party distributors, manufacturers and suppliers by identifying and qualifying alternative distributors, manufacturers and suppliers. The Company regularly assess its supply chain for threats to business continuity.
See "Risk Factors – Risks Relating to the Company’s Business and Industry – The Company relies on third-parties for the transportation of its hemp and hemp-derived products, any delay or failure by these third-parties to meet the Company’s transport needs could impact the Company’s operations and financial performance; Supply chain issues, including significant price fluctuations or shortages of materials, and distribution challenges may increase the Company’s cost of goods sold and cause its results of operations and financial condition to suffer."
Building Brand Awareness Management believes the Charlotte’s Web brand is among the strongest in the hemp-derived CBD industry. Brand recognition will continue to be driven by several factors including: (i) earned media events similar to what has historically occurred with the Company with entities such as CNN, Today Show, the New York Times and Forbes; (ii) paid media and affiliate programming through targeted consumer campaigns on major platforms; (iii) email, social media and blogs; (iv) partnerships and influencer marketing; (v) use of subject matter experts; (vi) legislative participation; (vii) public speaking engagements at key industry and cultural events; and (viii) B-Corporation certification and social impact partnerships. In addition to these active outlets to build brand awareness, the Company supports word-of-mouth endorsements and testimonials from its customers who are advocates for its brands and products. Marketing activations and marketing-driven innovations are developed with the support of industry data through various insight partners.
International Expansion The Company continues to explore increased global distribution. Expansion into additional jurisdictions will be done in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements in such jurisdictions and the cost and complexity of such compliance will form part of the strategic evaluation process for any proposed expansion. International penetration will be done primarily via local and regional sales and distribution partnerships.
Regulatory Framework As a hemp-related business, the Company is subject to extensive regulation. The industry in which the Company operates is subject to regulation and control resulting from legislation enacted by the various levels of government. All applicable legislation is a matter of public record, and the Company is unable to predict what additional legislation or amendments governments may enact in the future. Changes to government regulation could impact the Company’s existing and planned operations or increase its operating expenses, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For additional details on the regulatory risks facing the Company, see "Risk Factors – Risks Relating to the Regulatory Environment."
United States Regulatory Matters The Company does not produce or sell medicinal or recreational marijuana or products derived therefrom. It sells hemp-based CBD products. While such products come from the same plant genus and species, hemp and marijuana are legally distinct and are generally regulated, respectively, by the 2018 Farm Bill (which refers to the Agricultural Act of 2018) and the CSA (which refers to the U.S. Controlled Substances Act, 21 USC § 801 et. seq.). Hemp, by legal definition, contains 0.3% THC or less on a dry weight basis.
Consequently, the Company’s products are not sold pursuant to the rules and regulations governing the cultivation, transportation, and sale of medicinal or recreational marijuana. The Company cultivates, processes, transports, and sells its products pursuant to the 2018 Farm Bill and in accordance with applicable state and local laws. All hemp produced and sold by the Company constitutes hemp under the 2018 Farm Bill as well as under the laws of the states in which the Company cultivates, manufactures, and sells such hemp-based products. If sold internationally, products are sold in accordance with the laws of the importing and exporting jurisdiction.
16
The 2018 Farm Bill permanently removed hemp and its derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers from the purview of the CSA. Hemp is now deemed an agricultural commodity, and is no longer classified as a controlled substance, like marijuana. Furthermore, by defining hemp to include its derivatives, extracts, and cannabinoids,2 Congress impliedly removed popular hemp products, such as hemp-derived CBD, from the purview of the CSA. Accordingly, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA") no longer has regulatory authority to interfere with the interstate commerce of hemp products, so long as the THC level of such products is at or below 0.3% on a dry weight basis. The 2018 Farm Bill also provides that state and Native American tribal governments may impose separate restrictions or requirements on hemp growth and the sale of hemp products. However, they cannot interfere with the interstate transportation or shipment of lawfully produced hemp or hemp products. As a result of the 2018 Farm Bill, federal law now provides that CBD derived from hemp is not a controlled substance under the CSA; however, states take varying approaches to regulating the production and sale of hemp and hemp-derived CBD. Hemp cultivation is now permitted in all 50 states.3 A number of states prohibit the sale of ingestible CBD products based on the FDA's position that, pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the "FD&C Act"), it is unlawful to introduce food containing added CBD or THC into interstate commerce, or to market CBD or THC products as, or in, dietary supplements, regardless of whether the substances are hemp-derived. Several states have also enacted or are considering enacting THC limits and age-related sales restrictions for hemp-derived products that contain THC, such as full-spectrum hemp extracts.
The Company's activities related to the production, marketing and sale of its products comply with the 2018 Farm Bill, as applicable to its operations. However, certain government agencies (such as the FDA) and certain federal officials have challenged the scope of permissible commercial activity. FDA representatives, for example, have stated they believe that producers of some CBD-based products, including the Company, produce and sell their products in violation of the FD&C Act. Similarly, the Company’s marketing activities fall within the FDA’s jurisdiction, and in 2017, the FDA issued a Warning Letter to the Company for FD&C Act non-compliance, which the Company has responded to, in part to comply with the Warning Letter and in part to challenge FDA’s assertions in the letter. The Company has not received a response from the FDA and the Warning Letter remains open. Over the past several years, FDA has issued numerous Warning Letters to companies marketing CBD products with disease or unlawful drug claims. The letters reiterate the agency’s position that CBD cannot be added to food and dietary supplements and targeted companies whose products violated the FD&C Act’s prohibition against: i) marketing CBD as or in a dietary supplement, human and animal food, or food additives; ii) marketing a dietary supplement, human and animal food, or cosmetic with disease or drug claims (i.e., claims suggesting that a product is intended to treat, cure, or prevent disease); iii) including a substance in human or animal food when that substance is not GRAS; and iv) selling products that are misbranded due to their failure to include "adequate directions for use by a layperson". The FDA’s enforcement against the sale and marketing of CBD products has to date been limited to the issuance of Warning Letters, although enforcement could include civil and criminal penalties. The legal status of CBD non-drug products remain under active consideration by the FDA as of the date of this Form 10-K, as the agency continues to evaluate the potential regulatory frameworks that should apply to cannabis-derived products intended for non-drug uses. In January 2023, the FDA issued a statement concluding that existing regulatory frameworks for dietary supplements and foods are not appropriate for CBD due to potential safety risks, and that it will work with Congress to develop an appropriate pathway for the regulation of CBD products. While the Company disagrees with the position of the FDA, there is risk that this agency could take enforcement or regulatory actions against the Company.
Legal barriers applicable to, and risks associated with, selling hemp and hemp-derived CBD products result from a number of factors, including the fact that hemp and marijuana are both derived from the Cannabis sativa L. plant, the rapidly changing patchwork of state laws governing hemp and hemp-derived CBD, and the FDA’s position that it is unlawful to introduce food containing added CBD or THC into interstate commerce, or to market CBD or THC products as, or in, dietary supplements, i.e., the FDA’s position that CBD cannot be marketed in a dietary supplement on the basis that substantial clinical trials studying CBD as a new drug were made public prior to the marketing of any food or dietary supplement containing CBD, and therefore food or dietary supplements are precluded from containing this ingredient, referred to as the IND Preclusion. However, the Company believes that the removal of hemp and its extracts, including CBD, from the CSA pursuant to the 2018 Farm Bill, and the establishment of multiple state regulatory frameworks that permit the sale of hemp-derived CBD products are positive developments. Currently it is unclear whether Congress will move forward with legislation to allow CBD in dietary supplements in light of the FDA’s determination that a new regulatory pathway is needed. Timing for the FDA to develop a new pathway is also uncertain, but is likely to take several years.
2 Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (section 10113) (defining hemp under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, 7. U.S.C. 1621).
3 The District of Columbia does not currently permit hemp cultivation.
17
United States Federal Regulation of Hemp
Development of Current Regulatory Framework
Summary
In addition to customary regulations applicable to any commercial business, the Company’s operations are subject to state and federal regulation in respect of the cultivation of hemp and the production, distribution and sale of products intended for human ingestion or topical application and, with respect to certain products, by animals.
Botanically, hemp is categorized as Cannabis sativa L., a subspecies of the cannabis genus. Numerous unique, chemical compounds are extractable from hemp, including THC and CBD. These cannabinoids are responsible for a range of potential psychological and physiological effects. Hemp, as defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, is distinguishable from marijuana, which also comes from the Cannabis sativa L. subspecies, by its absence of more than trace amounts (0.3% or less) of the psychoactive compound THC. Although international standards vary, other countries, such as Canada, have used the same THC potency standards to define hemp.
The 2014 Farm Bill In 2014, Congress enacted the 2014 Farm Bill. The 2014 Farm Bill, the provisions of which expired as of December 31, 2021, authorized institutions of higher education and state departments of agriculture (and their contractual designees) to cultivate hemp, notwithstanding the CSA or any other federal law, provided that certain conditions are met.4 The scope of the 2014 Farm Bill was limited to cultivation that was: (a) for research purposes (inclusive of market research, which multiple federal agencies have confirmed includes commercial sales with a research purpose); (b) part of an "agricultural pilot program" or other agricultural or academic research; and (c) permitted by state law. Many states that adopted pilot programs under the 2014 Farm Bill have since replaced them with approved programs under the 2018 Farm Bill, which is further described below.5
FDA Approval of Epidiolex On June 25, 2018, the FDA issued to GW Pharmaceuticals plc its approval for Epidiolex, the first cannabis-derived prescription medicine to be available in the U.S. The active ingredient in Epidiolex is CBD isolate created from Marijuana-based plants.
The 2018 Farm Bill The 2018 Farm Bill became law on December 20, 2018. Prior to this law, all non-exempt cannabis plants grown in the United States were scheduled as a controlled substance under the CSA, and as a result, the cultivation of hemp for any purpose in the United States without a Schedule I registration with the DEA was, unless exempted by the 2014 Farm Bill, illegal under federal law. The passage of the 2018 Farm Bill materially changed federal laws governing hemp by removing hemp from the CSA and establishing a federal regulatory framework for hemp cultivation. Specifically, the 2018 Farm Bill: (a) explicitly amended the CSA to exclude from the definition of marijuana all parts of the cannabis plant (including its derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not) containing a THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; (b) allows the commercial production and sale of hemp in interstate commerce; (c) establishes the USDA as the primary federal agency regulating the cultivation of hemp in the United States, while allowing states to adopt their own plans to regulate the same; and (d) affords farmers the opportunity to obtain crop insurance and research grants. The 2018 Farm Bill also excluded from the CSA definition of "tetrahydrocannabinol" any material, compound, mixture, or preparation that falls within the definition of hemp. By defining hemp to include its derivatives, extracts, and cannabinoids, popular hemp products, such as hemp-derived CBD, are no longer subject to DEA control. Accordingly, the DEA no longer has regulatory authority to interfere with the interstate commerce of hemp products, so long as the THC level of such products is at or below 0.3%.
Although the DEA no longer regulates hemp, marijuana continues to be classified as a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA. As a result, CBD and other cannabinoids, if derived from marijuana as defined by the CSA, also remain Schedule I controlled substances under U.S. federal law. Though chemically and genetically distinct, hemp and marijuana appear similar to the naked eye. The active enforcement against illegal marijuana and marijuana-based products under current federal law may inadvertently result in enforcement actions taken against hemp or hemp-derived products.
The 2018 Farm Bill amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to categorize hemp as an agricultural commodity under the regulatory purview of the USDA in coordination with state departments of agriculture. Although the USDA is the primary federal regulatory agency
4 See http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-medical-marijuana-laws.aspx.
5 https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/hemp/state-and-tribal-plan-review.
18
overseeing hemp cultivation in the United States, states, U.S. territories, and Indian tribes desiring to obtain (or retain) primary regulatory authority over hemp activities within their borders are allowed to do so after submitting a plan for regulation to the USDA, and receiving approval from the USDA for the same. Pursuant to the 2018 Farm Bill, states, U.S. territories, and tribal governments can adopt their own regulatory plans for hemp cultivation, even if more restrictive than federal regulations, so long as the plans meet minimum federal standards and are approved by the USDA. Hemp cultivation in states and tribal territories that do not choose to submit their own plans (and that do not prohibit hemp cultivation) will be governed by USDA regulation.
On January 19, 2021, the USDA released the USDA Final Rule ("USDA FR"), which governs the domestic production of hemp under the 2018 Farm Bill. The USDA FR also specifies the provisions that a state or tribal hemp plan must contain to be in compliance with the 2018 Farm Bill. To date, the USDA has approved over 90 state and tribal hemp production plans.
As noted above, state and tribal governments may impose separate restrictions or requirements on hemp cultivation and the sale of hemp products; however, states may not interfere with the interstate transportation or shipment of lawfully produced hemp or hemp products. This was confirmed in a May 2019 memorandum released by the USDA’s Office of General Counsel. That memorandum reiterateed that, due to enactment of the 2018 Farm Bill, states and Native American tribes may not prohibit the interstate transportation or shipment of hemp lawfully produced under the 2014 or 2018 Farm Bills.
It is important to note that the 2018 Farm Bill preserves the authority and jurisdiction of the FDA, under the FD&C Act, to regulate the manufacture, marketing, and sale of food, drugs, dietary supplements, and cosmetics, including products that contain hemp extracts and derivatives, such as CBD. As a result, the FD&C Act will continue to apply to hemp-derived food, drugs, dietary supplements, cosmetics, and devices introduced, or prepared for introduction, into interstate commerce. As a producer and marketer of hemp-derived products, the Company must comply with the FDA regulations applicable to manufacturing and marketing of FDA-regulated products. See "FDA Regulation", below.
On May 4, 2022, the FDA issued Warning Letters to five companies for selling products labeled as containing delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-8 THC) in ways that violate FD&C Act. This action was the first time the FDA issued Warning Letters for products containing delta-8 THC. In addition to the violations related to FDA-regulated products containing delta-8 THC, several of the Warning Letters outlined additional violations of the FD&C Act, including marketing CBD products claiming to treat medical conditions in humans and animals, promoting CBD products as dietary supplements, and adding CBD to human and animal foods.
On November 21, 2022, the FDA posted Warning Letters to five companies selling products containing CBD, stating that these companies were selling CBD containing products that people may confuse for traditional foods or beverages which may result in unintentional consumption or overconsumption of CBD. The FDA also stated that CBD-containing products in forms that are appealing to children, such as gummies, hard candies and cookies, are especially concerning.
On January 26, 2023, the FDA issued a statement denying three Citizen Petitions that had asked the agency to conduct rulemaking to allow the marketing of CBD products as dietary supplements, and further stated that a new regulatory pathway would benefit consumers by providing safeguards and oversight to manage and minimize risks related to CBD products. The agency suggested that Congress create a new regulatory pathway that balances individuals' access to CBD products with the necessary oversight to manage risks, adding it is prepared to work with Congress on this matter.
In addition, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") has pursued enforcement actions against companies making deceptive marketing claims related to CBD products, including scientifically unsupported claims about the products’ ability to treat serious health conditions, such as cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. On December 20, 2022 the FTC released a new Health Products Compliance Guidance. The document replaces and expands upon previous guidance focused on substantiating health-related claims for dietary supplements, clarifying that the scope will cover all health-related product advertising.6 The guidance describes in detail the amount and type of evidence needed to substantiate health-related claims, with more emphasis on the fact that the FTC, as a general rule, expects high quality randomized, placebo-controlled human clinical trials. On April 13, 2023, the FTC sent the Company and over 600 other companies a Notice of Penalty Offense letter.7 The Notice letters are intended to put advertisers on notice that they should avoid deceiving consumers with advertisements that make unsubstantiated product claims. The Notice letters also focus on the competent and reliable scientific evidence standard in the Health Products Compliance Guidance. Importantly, the letters are not Warning Letters and do not indicate or allege any wrongdo
6 https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Health-Products-Compliance-Guidance.pdf.
7 https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Sample-cover-letter-substantiaton.pdf.
19
ing; rather, the Notice letters are a procedural tool used by the FTC to collect monetary penalties in future actions, whereby the FTC can attempt to argue that a company receiving the Notice letter knowingly violated the law as it was on "notice" of a potential violation. Although this approach is untested and may not be defensible in court, the issuance of the Notice letters may signal the FTC is prepared to more closely scrutinize and potentially demand a higher level of substantiation to support health-related claims than in previous years.
On July 5, 2023, the FDA and FTC jointly issued cease-and-desist letters to six companies for marketing "copycat" food products containing delta-8 THC8. Similar to the FDA Warning Letters issued in November 2022, the letters assert that the products are adulterated foods that can easily be mistaken for traditional foods like chips, cookies, candy, gummies or other snack food items and raised concerns that such products can be accidentally ingested by consumers, including children, or consumed at higher amounts than intended.
On July 16, 2024, the FDA and FTC issued a second set of cease-and-desist letters to five companies marketing delta-8 THC products that resemble popular snacks and treats popular with children. Like the previous letters, the FTC stated that manufacturers’ online marketing of the products were deemed to be unfair or deceptive practices that put the health of young children at risk. These letters are part of the FDA and FTC’s ongoing joint effort to take action against companies selling copycat food products containing delta-8 THC9.
DEA IFR On August 21, 2020, the DEA issued an interim final rule (the "DEA IFR") concerning implementation of the 2018 Farm Bill. Even though the 2018 Farm Bill removed hemp from scheduling under the CSA, the DEA IFR purports to clarify that material that exceeds 0.3% delta-9 THC remains controlled in Schedule I of the CSA. Additionally, the DEA IFR states that the 2018 Farm Bill does not impact the control status of synthetically derived THCs, for which the DEA claims that the amount of delta-9 THC is not a determining factor in whether the material is a controlled substance.
The DEA IFR has caused consternation throughout the hemp industry because of concerns that it confuses the legality of in-process hemp extract material that may temporarily and unintentionally exceed 0.3% delta-9 (before returning to or below 0.3% delta-9 THC in finished form). However, DEA spokesperson Sean Mitchell has indicated that the DEA is aware of the hemp industry’s policy concerns and "has higher enforcement priorities, such as opioids and methamphetamine." Moreover, more than 3,300 public comments were submitted in response to the interim rule, many of which emphasized that the DEA IFR is inconsistent with the 2018 Farm Bill and would create serious challenges for the hemp products industry. Further, in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Congress included report language that directed the USDA to develop regulations to protect the transportation, sale, and storage of in-process hemp extract. To date, the DEA has not enforced the IFR and the Company believes the DEA IFR is improper and unconstitutional. It is possible that legal protections for in-process hemp extract and issues such as raising the THC limit for hemp in the field and establishing permissible THC levels in finished hemp products may be addressed in the upcoming Farm Bill. However, given the delayed passage of a new Farm Bill in 2024, non-core issues like hemp and controversial issues like THC thresholds may not be included in the final legislation, or its passage may be further delayed. The American Relief Act, 2025, signed into law on December 21, 2024, extended the 2018 Farm Bill for one year through September 30, 2025.
Congress Currently, the timing for legislation that may include a new potential regulatory pathway for CBD developed by the FDA is uncertain. While authorizing legislation could be introduced in 2025, the FDA’s development and implementation of a new pathway would likely take several years. As such, it is possible Congress may introduce and move forward with legislation that would authorize a pathway for hemp-derived CBD in a more efficient manner, and would permit the use of CBD in dietary supplements and/or food.
State Regulation of Hemp in the United States At present, the Company sources its hemp and hemp-derived ingredients from farming operations and ingredient suppliers that are in compliance with state and federal regulations. However, the Company is aware of variations in certain states’ definition of hemp as compared with the definition of hemp in the 2018 Farm Bill, although the majority of states have aligned their definition of hemp with the federal definition. All hemp produced and sold by the Company constitutes hemp under the 2018 Farm Bill as well as under the laws of the states in which the Company cultivates, manufactures and sells such hemp-based products.
Under the 2018 Farm Bill, states retain significant discretion and authority to adopt their own regulatory regimes governing hemp production. As a result, regulation of hemp and the products derived therefrom will likely continue to vary on a state-by-state basis even
8https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/07/ftc-sends-cease-desist-letters-fda-companies-selling-edible-products-containing-delta-8-thc.
9https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/07/ftc-fda-send-second-set-cease-desist-letters-companies-selling-products-containing-delta-8-thc.
20
though the 2018 Farm Bill has been fully implemented. In addition, states take varying approaches to regulating the production and sale of hemp-derived CBD. While some states explicitly authorize and regulate the sale of hemp-derived CBD products, or otherwise provide legal protection for authorized individuals to engage in commercial hemp activities, other states maintain outdated drug laws that do not distinguish between marijuana, hemp and/or hemp-derived CBD, resulting in hemp being classified as a controlled substance under state law. Additionally, a number of states prohibit the sale of ingestible CBD products based on FDA’s position that, pursuant to the FD&C Act, it is unlawful to introduce food containing added CBD or THC into interstate commerce, or to market CBD or THC products as, or in, dietary supplements, regardless of whether the substances are hemp-derived. Since the Company’s products are specifically excepted from the CSA by the 2018 Farm Bill’s definition of hemp, it is the Company’s position that such state laws would specifically except them as well.
Accordingly, the sale of CBD at the retail level in some U.S. states remains a gray and evolving area of the law. A number of states have passed legislation that explicitly permits the sale of CBD. Several states also place additional requirements on the sale of CBD products such as specific testing, labeling, packaging, or registration of products. Recently, some states have enacted milligram limits on the amount of THC in hemp-derived products and have prohibited the sale of products containing THC to those under 21. Several states are currently considering legislation imposing similar restrictions. The Company understands that there are risks of state and local law enforcement or regulatory action, and the state-specific requirements may vary significantly.
FDA Regulation The governing food and drug law in the United States is the FD&C Act. One purpose of the FD&C Act is to forbid the movement in interstate commerce of adulterated and misbranded food, drugs, devices and cosmetics.10 The FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices; and by ensuring the safety of the nation's food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.11 The FD&C Act prohibits the use in a food or dietary supplement of an ingredient that has already been approved as a new drug, or an article authorized for investigation as a new drug for which substantial clinical investigations have been instituted and made public. To date, the FDA has approved one product containing CBD as a drug, and continues to take the position that CBD cannot be marketed as a dietary supplement or added to food because a product containing CBD was approved as a drug and substantial clinical trials studying CBD as a new drug were made public prior to the marketing of any food or dietary supplements containing CBD, and therefore dietary supplements or food are precluded from containing this ingredient. While the Company disagrees with the FDA's position, this creates additional barriers to selling certain CBD and CBD-based products in the U.S.
Notably, the FDA does not impose the same restrictions on the use of CBD in cosmetic products. The agency states on its website that "[c]ertain cosmetic ingredients are prohibited or restricted by regulation, but currently that is not the case for any cannabis or cannabis-derived ingredients."12 However the FDA further notes that such products must comply with all applicable legal requirements including the adulteration and misbranding provisions of the FD&C Act specific to cosmetic products.
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (the "DSHEA"), an amendment to the federal FD&C Act, established a framework governing the composition, safety, labeling, manufacturing, and marketing of dietary supplements in the United States. Generally, under the DSHEA, dietary ingredients marketed in the United States prior to October 15, 1994 may be used in dietary supplements without notifying the FDA. "New" dietary ingredients (i.e., dietary ingredients "not marketed in the United States before October 15, 1994") must be the subject of a new dietary ingredient notification submitted to the FDA unless the ingredient has been "present in the food supply as an article used for food" and is not "chemically altered". Any NDI notification must provide the FDA with evidence of a "history of use or other evidence of safety" establishing that use of the dietary ingredient "will reasonably be expected to be safe."13
As noted above, the FDA has taken the position that CBD cannot be marketed as a dietary supplement because it has been the subject of investigation as a new drug (referred to as "IND Preclusion"). According to the FDA, the submission of the IND for Epidiolex and Sativex by Greenwich Biosciences, the U.S. subsidiary of London-based GW Pharmaceuticals, preceded the sales and marketing of CBD as a dietary supplement. Excluded from the DSHEA definition of a dietary supplement is: "an article authorized for investigation as a new drug, antibiotic, or biological for which substantial clinical investigations have been instituted and for which the existence of such investigations
10 https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-basics/how-did-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act-come-about.
11 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Mission Statement: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/what-we-do.
12 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "FDA Regulation of Cannabis and Cannabis-Derived Products, Including Cannabidiol (CBD), Questions and Answers," https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/fda-regulation-cannabis-and-cannabis-derived-products-including-cannabidiol-cbd#qandas.
13 21 U.S. Code § 350b(a)(2).
21
has been made public, which was not before such approval, certification, licensing, or authorization marketed as a dietary supplement or as a food unless the Secretary, in the Secretary’s discretion, has issued a regulation, after notice and comment, finding that the article would be lawful under this Act."14 It is the FDA’s interpretation of the IND Preclusion that the preclusion date is the date in which it authorized the drug for investigation; however, the Company believes there are significant arguments against this position in that all conditions of the statute must be met before the IND Preclusion applies, including (1) authorization for investigation as a new drug; (2) substantial clinical investigations must be instituted; (3) such substantial investigations must be made public; and (4) all of the above must occur prior to the marketing of the article as a food or dietary supplement.
On July 23, 2021, the Company was advised by the FDA of its objection to a New Dietary Ingredient Notification ("NDIN") submitted by the Company earlier in 2021. The FD&C Act requires that manufacturers who wish to market dietary supplements that contain NDIs notify the FDA with their basis for concluding that a dietary supplement containing the NDI will reasonably be expected to be safe. The Company’s submission was objected to on the basis that its CBD-containing a full-spectrum hemp extract does not meet the definition of a dietary supplement due to the IND Preclusion and insufficient safety data. The Company does not agree with a number of conclusions reached by the FDA, in particular, its analysis of safety data provided. While the objection has not impacted the Company’s existing business, the Company will continue to engage with the FDA and lawmakers with the objective of securing a favorable ruling and/or facilitating the enactment of definitive legislation establishing an appropriate regulatory environment to protect consumers and to establish guidance for manufacturers and marketers of CBD-containing dietary supplements.
The CBD CLINIC and CBD MEDIC brands include products that are OTC drug products regulated by the FDA. To legally market an OTC drug product, the FD&C Act and FDA regulations promulgated under its authority require FDA approval of a New Drug Application ("NDA") that includes substantial evidence of effectiveness based on adequate and well-controlled studies, or an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA"). Alternatively, an OTC drug product may be marketed without an FDA approved NDA or ANDA if the drug product is manufactured in compliance with an OTC drug regulation, referred to as a monograph, which has been established for that therapeutic class of drug. The OTC drug monographs identify permissible active ingredients, labeling, and claims. OTC monographs generally do not specify inactive ingredients that may be used in the manufacture of OTC drugs. OTC drugs marketed in compliance with a final monograph are generally recognized and safe and effective, and are exempt from premarket approval requirements.
On May 2, 2023, the FDA issued the final monograph titled "Over-the-Counter (OTC) Monograph M017: External Analgesic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use." The FDA allows drugs products that comply with the tentative final monograph to be marketed under its enforcement discretion policy. Formulation, labeling, and marketing must conform to the final monograph, or the OTC drug products may be considered adulterated or misbranded under the FD&C Act.
The active ingredients in the Company’s products offered under CBD CLINIC and CBD MEDIC brands (menthol and camphor) are currently covered by the Over-the-Counter (OTC) Monograph M017: External Analgesic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use. The final monograph does not specify or otherwise address what inactive ingredients may be used in external analgesic drug products.
Inactive ingredients do not require individual approval by the FDA. The FDA evaluates an inactive ingredient within the context of an NDA. After approval of the NDA, the FDA will list the inactive ingredients in the approved drug product in the FDA’s Inactive Ingredient Database. Based on the listings in this Database, the FDA has not approved an NDA for a new drug containing CBD as an inactive ingredient. FDA does not list OTC inactive ingredients in the Inactive Ingredient Database for OTC drug products manufactured and marketed in accordance with an OTC monograph. It is the drug manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure the suitability and safety of the inactive ingredients in its OTC monographed drug products. On March 22, 2021, the FDA issued a news release announcing the issuance of Warning Letters to two companies for selling OTC products labeled as containing CBD, alleging that the products are illegally marketed unapproved drugs.15 Similar Warning Letters were issued to CBD companies in 2021 and 2022. The letters explain that, because CBD has known pharmacological effects on humans, with demonstrated risks, it cannot be legally marketed as an inactive ingredient in OTC drug products that are not reviewed and approved by the FDA. In the letters, the FDA also alleged the products are misbranded due to the prominent featuring of CBD on the labeling, which the FDA stated is misleading because it presents the CBD inactive ingredients "in a manner that creates an impression of value greater than their true functional role in the formulation." 16 Since 2022, the FDA has not issued similar letters to
14 21 U.S. Code § 321(ff)(3)(B).
15 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "FDA Warns Companies Illegally Selling Over-the-Counter CBD Products for Pain Relief," https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-warns-companies-illegally-selling-over-counter-cbd-products-pain-relief.
16 See 21 CFR 201.10(c)(4), Drugs; statement of ingredients.
22
marketers of CBD-containing OTC products, or issued any public statements with respect to the use of CBD in OTC drugs.
The Company's CBD CLINIC and CBD MEDIC products are manufactured by a third-party manufacturer, Aidance, in an FDA-registered facility which complies with GMP requirements. The CBD CLINIC and CBD MEDIC products are manufactured under the Aidance Manufacturing and Services Agreement and are marketed in compliance with the Over-the-Counter (OTC) Monograph M017: External Analgesic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use as described above. As such, the Company takes the position that these products are exempt from the requirements for an NDA or ANDA pre-market approval. Aidance, as the manufacturer, has registered its facility as a drug establishment and Aidance and Company have submitted to FDA for National Drug Code ("NDC") numbers for the OTC drug products. There is no assurance that the position taken by the Company that its products are exempt from the requirements for an NDA or ANDA pre-market approval will not, in the future, be challenged by the FDA, which could result in material adverse effects to the Company and its business.
The FD&C Act provides that a substance added to food is unsafe unless the substance is GRAS ("Generally Recognized as Safe"). The FDA has not recognized CBD as GRAS for human consumption, although certain hemp seed derivatives may be considered GRAS.17 Further research is needed to determine if other cannabinoids would be considered GRAS or what steps would be necessary for them to be recognized as GRAS. In the meantime, stakeholders including the Company are collecting data to pursue a GRAS determination for CBD, as the FDA has indicated it cannot conclude that CBD is GRAS due to the current lack of information to support this determination. As discussed below on March 6, 2020, the Company achieved self-affirmed GRAS status for its hemp extract, adding to the current body of scientific literature on the safe use of CBD. Enforcement of this prohibition on the use of CBD in food has been generally limited to products making unlawful drug or disease claims, with the FDA also asserting its position that CBD is not a permissible food or dietary supplement ingredient. The Company’s products containing CBD derived from hemp are not marketed or sold using claims that the products are intended to diagnose, mitigate, treat, cure, or prevent disease in violation of the FD&C Act.
As noted above, in January 2023, the FDA stated that a new regulatory pathway is necessary to provide safeguards and manage the risks related to CBD products. In the statement, the agency suggested that Congress create a new regulatory pathway that balances individuals' access to CBD products with the necessary oversight to manage these risks, adding it is prepared to work with Congress on this matter. The FDA also noted that it "will continue to take action against CBD and other cannabis-derived products to protect the public, in coordination with state regulatory partners, when appropriate" and "will remain diligent in monitoring the marketplace, identifying products that pose risks and acting within our authorities." Based on this statement, a significant shift in the enforcement landscape is not expected. In the past year, Warning Letters for cannabis-derived products have primarily focused on delta-8 THC products18.
Despite the position taken by the FDA that there is no evidence of CBD being marketed as a food or dietary supplement prior to drug trials being commenced and made public, the Company believes there is substantial uncertainty and different interpretations among state and federal regulatory agencies, legislators, academics and businesses as to whether cannabinoids including CBD were present in the food supply and marketed prior to October 15, 1994 or whether such inclusion of cannabinoids is otherwise permitted by the FDA as dietary ingredients. As a result, the Company believes the federal legality regarding the distribution and sale of hemp-based products intended for human consumption must be considered on a case-by-case basis and that the uncertainties cannot be resolved without further federal legislation, regulation or a definitive judicial interpretation of existing legislation and rules. However, if the FDA were to enforce the IND Preclusion based on its interpretation of the legislation, this would have a materially adverse effect upon the Company and its business. Currently it is unclear whether Congress will move forward with legislation to permit the use of CBD in dietary supplements, given FDA’s January 2023 determination that existing regulatory frameworks are not appropriate for CBD. Continued delays in the development of a regulatory pathway for CBD may have a materially adverse effect on the Company and its business.
Future Uncertainty of Legal Status There remain a number of considerations and uncertainties regarding the cultivation, sourcing, production and distribution of hemp and products containing hemp derivatives. Applicable laws and regulations remain subject to change as there are different interpretations among federal, state and local regulatory agencies, legislators, academics and businesses with respect to the treatment of the importation of derivatives from exempted portions of the cannabis plant and the scope of operation of 2018 Farm Bill-compliant hemp programs. These different federal, state and local agency interpretations, as discussed above, touch on the regulation
17 In December 2018, FDA stated it had no questions following the submission of three GRAS notifications concluding that hulled hemp seed, hemp see protein powder, and hemp seed oil are GRAS for the intended conditions of use outlined in the notifications: https://www.fda.gov/food/cfsan-constituent-updates/fda-responds-three-gras-notices-hemp-seed-derived-ingredients-use-human-food.
18 https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/warning-letters-cannabis-derived-products
23
of cannabinoids by the FDA and the extent to which the 2018 Farm Bill-compliant cultivators and processors may engage in interstate commerce, whether under federal and/or state law. The uncertainties likely cannot be resolved without further federal and state legislation, regulation or a definitive judicial interpretation of existing legislation and rules.
Environmental Regulation The Company’s hemp extract wellness products and cultivation operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulations and permitting requirements regarding air emissions, water discharges and the handling and disposal of hazardous wastes, among other matters. Compliance with such regulations and requirements have not had, nor are they expected to have, any direct material effect on the Company’s capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. However, such factors could indirectly affect the Company and its business, operations, vendors or suppliers, or could impact those with whom the Company serves or is served by in the supply chain for the Company’s products. While the Company has no reason to believe the operation of its facilities violates any such regulations or requirements, if such a violation were to occur, or if environmental regulations were to become more stringent in the future, the Company could be adversely affected.
International Regulatory Matters Legislative approaches to the regulation of CBD-related products vary country by country, including local regulations with respect to THC content, and continue to evolve. In some cases, there may be a disconnect between a foreign country’s import requirements and the United States’ export requirements with respect to hemp. The Company makes decisions as to international expansion upon completion of a regulatory review and assessment of risk.
The Company has sold its products in Canada, and other jurisdictions through third-party distributors who take delivery in bulk and manage individual orders. Each of these countries regulates the import of cannabis-derived products and requires some form of importation license, permit or other documentation for products. The exact nature of the importation documentation varies from country to country, and is affected by various factors, including the level of THC content and the intended use of the product. For example, in certain international jurisdictions, CBD products may be regulated as a dietary supplement and subject to local packaging and labelling requirements, whereas in certain jurisdictions a prescription from a licensed medical practitioner is required. See "Risk Factors – Risks Relating to the Regulatory Environment – The Company is subject to regulations that could impact its ability to sell its product internationally."
Additional Information
The Company’s head office is located at 700 Tech Court, Louisville, Colorado, United States 80027 and its registered and records office is located at Suite 2700 Park Place, 1133 Melville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 4E5. The Company's website address is www.charlottesweb.com. The Company has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics posted on this site. The information provided on the Charlotte’s Web website is not part of this or any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company is subject to a number of risks potentially impacting its business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows, many of which are beyond its control. The risks and uncertainties described in this Form 10-K are those the Company currently believes to be material, but they are not the only ones faced by the Company. If any of the following risks, or any other risks and uncertainties not identified or currently not considered to be material, actually occur or become material risks, the Company's business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and consequently the price of the Common Shares could be materially and adversely affected. In all these cases, the trading price of the Company's securities could decline, and investors could lose all or part of their investment.
Investors should carefully consider the risk factors set out below and consider all other information contained herein and in the Company’s other public filings when evaluating an investment decision.
Risks Relating to the Regulatory Environment
The regulatory environment surrounding hemp is uncertain, varies among jurisdictions, and is subject to change. The 2018 Farm Bill provides that states and Native American tribes may assume primary regulatory authority over the production of hemp in their jurisdictions through a hemp plan approved by the USDA. As of the date hereof, the USDA has approved over 90 state and tribal hemp production plans submitted after the USDA FR became effective. If a state does not elect to devise a hemp regulatory program, the USDA’s program will govern licensees in such states. Continued development of the hemp industry will depend on continued legislative authorization of hemp at the state level, and further amendment or supplementation of legislation at the federal level. Any number of events or occurrences
24
could slow or halt progress all together in this space. Numerous factors may impact or negatively affect the legislative process(es) within the various states the Company has business interests in. Any one of these factors could slow or halt use of hemp or hemp cannabinoids such as CBD, which would negatively impact the Company’s business or growth, including possibly causing the Company to discontinue operations as a whole.
Legislative and regulatory uncertainties, along with difficulties concerning potential enforcement activities by U.S. federal, state and local governments (or discretion exercised thereby), also represent significant risks to the Company’s business activities. Possible risks include, but are not limited to:
•positions asserted by the FDA concerning products containing derivatives from hemp;
•uncertainty surrounding the characterization of cannabinoids as a dietary ingredient by the FDA; and
•enforcement activities by state and/or local law enforcement and regulatory authorities under the auspice of individual state law, regardless of any potential conflict thereby with federal law.
If the Company’s operations are found to be in violation of any of such laws or any other governmental regulations, or if applicable laws or regulations change or the enforcement of applicable laws or regulations changes, the Company may be subject to penalties, including, without limitation, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of the Company’s operations or asset seizures, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s business and financial results.
The future of hemp regulation at the Federal level is unclear. Federal regulations under the 2018 Farm Bill were promulgated in the USDA FR on January 19, 2021. The USDA FR governs the domestic production of hemp under the 2018 Farm Bill and also specifies the provisions that a state or tribal hemp plan must contain to be in compliance with the 2018 Farm Bill. DEA’s interpretation of the 2018 Farm Bill has been promulgated in the DEA IFR, published on August 21, 2020. The DEA IFR remains subject to change. FDA regulations have not been issued and it is not clear at this time how the FDA will treat hemp products. Additional unfavorable requirements from the DEA or FDA may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company’s products are subject to numerous and diverse regulatory requirements which may restrict the Company’s ability to sell its product, and regulatory compliance costs may affect the Company’s business and financial results. The production, labeling and distribution of the Company’s products are regulated by various federal, state and local agencies. These governmental authorities may commence regulatory or legal proceedings, which could restrict the permissible scope of the Company’s product claims or the ability to sell its products in the future.
The Company is subject to regulation by various agencies as a result of the manufacture and sale of its hemp-based wellness products. The shifting compliance environment, and the need to build and maintain robust systems to comply with different regulations in multiple jurisdictions, increases the possibility that the Company may violate one or more of the requirements. If the Company’s operations are found to be in violation of any of such laws or any other governmental regulations, or perceived to be in violation thereof, the Company may be subject to penalties or other negative effects, including, without limitation, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of the Company’s operations or asset seizures and the denial of regulatory applications (including those regulatory regimes outside of the scope of the FDA's jurisdiction, but which may rely on the positions of the FDA in the application of its regulatory regime), any of which could adversely affect the Company’s business and financial results. In addition, the FDA is expected to make determinations as to how certain CBD products will be regulated and is expected to, in the long term, consider modernization in its regulation of dietary supplements generally. The FDA and/or Congress may also develop a new regulatory pathway or pursue legislation that imposes requirements beyond those currently applicable to dietary supplements. There can be no assurance that any such new or additional regulations would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to comply with FDA requirements may result in, among other things, injunctions, product withdrawals, recalls, product seizures, fines and criminal prosecutions. The Company’s advertising is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") under the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act") as well as subject to regulation by the FDA under the DSHEA. In recent years, the FTC has initiated numerous investigations of dietary and nutritional supplement products and companies based on allegedly deceptive or misleading claims, and also released guidance aimed at strengthening its substantiation requirements for health-related claims. At any point, enforcement strategies of a given agency can change as a result of other litigation in the space or changes in political landscapes, and could result in increased enforcement efforts, which could materially impact the Company’s business. Additionally, some states also permit
25
advertising and labeling laws to be enforced by state attorneys general, who may seek relief for consumers, class action certifications, class wide damages and recalls of products sold by the Company. Private litigants may also seek relief for consumers, class action certifications, class wide damages and recalls of products sold by the Company. Any actions against the Company by governmental authorities or private litigants could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Compliance with changes in legal, regulatory and industry standards may adversely affect the Company’s business. The formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labelling, handling, distribution, importation, exportation, licensing, sale and storage of the Company’s products are affected by extensive laws, governmental regulations, administrative determinations, court decisions and similar constraints. Such laws, regulations and other constraints may exist at the federal, state, provincial or local levels. There is currently no uniform regulation applicable to natural health products nationally or worldwide. There can be no assurance that the Company is in compliance with all of these laws, regulations and other constraints, and changes to such laws, regulations and other constraints may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations. Through December 31, 2024, several states have adopted new regulations that may impact the Company's ability to sell certain of its products as currently formulated or packaged in these states.
There is substantial uncertainty and different interpretations among federal, state and local regulatory agencies, legislators, academics and businesses as to the importation of derivatives from exempted portions of the cannabis plant and the emerging regulation of cannabinoids. These different opinions include, but are not limited to, the regulation of cannabinoids by the FDA and the extent to which manufacturers of products containing imported raw materials and/or 2018 Farm Bill compliant cultivators and processors may engage in interstate commerce. The uncertainties cannot be resolved without further federal, and potentially state-level, legislation, regulation or a definitive judicial interpretation of existing legislation and rules. If these uncertainties continue, they may have an adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows or growth prospects, and the introduction of its products in different markets.
The Company is subject to regulations that could impact its ability to sell its product internationally. The Company has conducted sales in various international jurisdictions and the Company intends to expand internationally. As a result, it is and will become further subject to the laws and regulations of (as well as international treaties among) the foreign jurisdictions in which it operates or imports or exports products or materials. In addition, the Company may avail itself of proposed legislative changes in certain jurisdictions to expand its product portfolio, which expansion may include business and regulatory compliance risks as yet undetermined. Failure by the Company to comply with the current or evolving regulatory framework in any jurisdiction could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. There is the possibility that any such international jurisdiction could determine that the Company was not or is not compliant with applicable local regulations. If the Company’s historical or current sales or operations were found to be in violation of such international regulations, the Company may be subject to enforcement actions in such jurisdictions including, but not limited to civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of the Company’s operations or asset seizures and the denial of regulatory applications.
Cannabis-related financial transactions are subject to a variety of laws that vary by jurisdiction, many of which are unsettled and still developing. While the interpretations of these laws are unclear in some jurisdictions, financial benefit, directly or indirectly, arising from conduct that would be considered unlawful in such jurisdiction may be viewed to be within the purview of such laws, and persons receiving any such benefit, including investors in an applicable jurisdiction, may be subject to liability. Each prospective investor should contact their own legal advisor.
There has been an increasing movement in certain markets to increase the regulation of natural health products, which will impose additional restrictions or requirements. In addition, there has been increased regulatory scrutiny of nutritional supplements and marketing claims under existing and new regulations. Such anticipated regulatory and standards changes may introduce some risk and harm the Company’s operations if its products or advertising activities are found to violate existing or new regulations, or if the Company is not able to affect necessary changes to its products in a timely and efficient manner to respond to new regulations.
Entry into international markets diverts management attention and requires financial resources that could be spent elsewhere and poses increased costs due to numerous banking, compliance, financial, legal, market, and reputational issues. The Company’s entry into new international markets requires management attention and financial resources that would otherwise be spent on other parts of its business. The Company’s international sales could expose it to risks and expenses inherent in operating or selling products in foreign jurisdictions, and developing and emerging markets in particular where the risks may be heightened. These risks and expenses include:
•adverse currency exchange rate fluctuations;
26
•risks associated with complying with laws and regulations in the countries in which the Company’s products are sold, such as requirements to apply for and obtain licenses, permits or other approvals for the Company’s products, and the delays associated with obtaining such licenses, permits or other approvals;
•the costs of adapting products for sale in foreign countries, including changes to formulations, formats, labelling or packaging;
•multiple, changing, and often inconsistent enforcement of laws, rules and regulations, including regulations and standards relating to consumer health products;
•risks associated with the reliance on the Company’s international distributors, including the possible failure of its international distributors to appropriately understand, represent and effectively market and sell the Company’s products;
•damage to the Company’s reputation or brand if counterfeit versions of the Company’s products are introduced into its international markets;
•damage to the Company’s brand or reputation, or consumer confusion, if CBD products are categorized according to local regulation as marijuana, medical marijuana or a similar category;
•the imposition of additional foreign governmental controls or regulations, new or enhanced trade restrictions or non-tariff barriers to trade, or restrictions on the activities of foreign agents, representatives, employees and distributors;
•increases in taxes, tariffs, customs and duties, or costs associated with compliance with import and export licensing and other compliance requirements;
•downward pricing pressure on the Company’s products in international markets, due to competitive factors or otherwise;
•laws and business practices favoring local companies;
•political, social or economic unrest or instability, including, without limitation, disruptions due to armed conflicts;
•greater risk on credit terms, longer payment cycles and difficulties in enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through certain foreign legal systems;
•difficulties in enforcing or defending intellectual property rights; and
•the effect of disruptions caused by severe weather, natural disasters, outbreak of disease or other events that make travel to a particular region less attractive or more difficult.
The Company’s international efforts may not produce desired levels of sales. Furthermore, its experience with selling products in its current international markets may not be relevant or may not necessarily translate into favorable results if the Company sells in other international markets. If and when the Company enters into new markets in the future, it may experience different competitive conditions, less familiarity with its brands and/or different consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns. As a result, the Company may be less successful than expected in expanding its sales in its current and targeted international markets. Sales into new international markets may take longer to ramp up and reach expected sales and profit levels, or may never do so, thereby affecting its overall growth and profitability. To build brand awareness in new markets, the Company may need to make greater investments in advertising and promotional activity than originally planned, which could negatively impact the profitability of its sales in those markets. These, or one or more of the factors listed above, may harm the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition. Any material decrease in the Company’s international sales or profitability could also adversely impact its business, results of operations or financial condition.
Additionally, the Company may expand its product offerings and/or expand into new international markets, each of which will require management attention and financial resources that would otherwise be spent on other parts of its business. Such expansion would expose the Company to risks and expenses inherent in selling new products and offering products in new foreign jurisdictions, which could increase its operational, regulatory, compliance, reputational and foreign exchange rate risks. The failure of the Company’s operating infrastructure to support such expansion could result in operational failures and regulatory fines or sanctions. Future product, market or
27
international expansion could require the Company to incur a number of up-front expenses, including those associated with obtaining regulatory clearance or approvals, as well as additional ongoing expenses, including those associated with infrastructure, staff and regulatory compliance. Any expansion efforts will be subject to various laws, regulations and guidelines that are subject to change over time, and result in increased costs and risk associated with regulatory compliance. In addition, product and market expansion could impact the Company’s current product offerings, brand, and reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
The designation of cannabinoids as a New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) or as an impermissible adulterant are uncertain. The FD&C Act requires that manufacturers who wish to market dietary supplements that contain "new dietary ingredients" ("NDI") notify the FDA with their basis for concluding that a dietary supplement containing such dietary ingredient will reasonably be expected to be safe. There is substantial uncertainty and different interpretations among state and federal regulatory agencies, legislators, academics and businesses as to whether cannabinoids were present in the food supply and marketed prior to October 15, 1994, or whether such inclusion of cannabinoids are permissible dietary ingredients under the FD&C Act. The uncertainties cannot be resolved without further federal legislation, regulation, or a definitive judicial interpretation of existing legislation, regulation and rules. For instance, on July 23, 2021, the Company was advised by the FDA of its objection to a New Dietary Ingredient Notification ("NDIN") submitted by the Company earlier in 2021. The Company's submission was objected to on the basis that a full-spectrum hemp extract does not meet the definition of a dietary supplement because the FDA has taken the position that CBD was not marketed as a dietary supplement or conventional food prior to its authorization for investigation as a new drug. The Company disagrees with the FDA’s position that CBD was not marketed as dietary supplement or food prior to the investigation of CBD as a new drug, and believes there are arguments against this position. There is no guarantee that federal legislation, regulation, or judicial action will override the FDA’s position and permit the use of CBD as an NDI, or as a dietary ingredient generally. If the FDA’s position is not modified, this would have a materially adverse effect upon the Company and its business.
The FDA interpretation of IND Preclusion could be disruptive to the Company’s ability to sell its products. The FDA has taken the position that CBD cannot be added to food or marketed as a dietary supplement because it was the subject of investigation as a new drug (i.e., IND Preclusion). The FDA has asserted its IND Preclusion position in a Warning Letter to the Company. The Company responded to the Warning Letter with its position that CBD was marketed in a dietary supplement or food prior to substantial clinical investigations being instituted and being made public. Any attempt by the FDA to enforce the IND Preclusion could adversely impact the Company’s business and management focus as the Company would need to take appropriate actions to defend its position.
The FDA enforcement against the sale and marketing of CBD products under the FD&C Act could target the Company and adversely impact the Company’s business and financial position. The FDA continues to enforce against violations of the FD&C Act by issuing warning letters to companies marketing and selling hemp-derived CBD products. Over the past several years, the FDA has issued warning letters to companies marketing and selling unapproved hemp-derived CBD products. The letters reiterate the agency’s position that CBD cannot be added to food and dietary supplements and targeted companies whose products violated the FD&C Act’s prohibition against: i) marketing CBD as or in a dietary supplement, human and animal food, or food additives; ii) marketing a dietary supplement, human and animal food, or cosmetic with disease or drug claims (i.e., claims suggesting that a product is intended to treat, cure, or prevent disease); iii) including a substance in human or animal food when that substance is not GRAS; and iv) selling products that are misbranded due to their failure to include "adequate directions for use by a layperson". The FDA also issued a consumer update reaffirming its position that CBD cannot lawfully be added to a food or marketed as a dietary supplement due to existing provisions of the FD&C Act, and outlining the data and potential safety issues it is considering as part of its ongoing evaluation of potential regulatory frameworks for CBD. Notably, the FDA states that it could not conclude based on available data that CBD is "generally recognized as safe" for use in human or animal food. While this is broad and may not be applicable in all instances, it nevertheless could materially and adversely impact the Company’s business and financial condition. Further, the FDA has recently stated that it will continue to police the market and enforce against CBD products, and on March 22, 2021, the agency issued warning letters to two companies for selling OTC products labeled as containing CBD, alleging the products were illegally marketed unapproved drugs and misbranded due to prominent featuring of CBD on the labeling, followed by additional warning letters issued in 2021 and 2022. The FDA’s enforcement against the unlawful sale and marketing of CBD products has to date been limited to the issuance of warning letters, but other enforcement means are available to the FDA, including civil and criminal penalties. The FDA’s current prohibition on certain hemp-derived products and the unknowns and associated risks of potential future regulations governing hemp-derived CBD products create risk for the Company’s business.
On January 26, 2023, the FDA announced its conclusion that existing regulatory pathways are not appropriate for CBD and that a new regulatory pathway would benefit consumers by providing safeguards and oversight to manage and minimize risks related to CBD products. The agency also stated it is prepared to work with Congress on this matter and that it "will continue to take action against CBD
28
and other cannabis-derived products to protect the public, in coordination with state regulatory partners, when appropriate" by "monitoring the marketplace, identifying products that pose risks and acting within our authorities." If the FDA does not work expeditiously with Congress to develop a new pathway, or if Congress does not proceed with its own legislative initiatives to advance a regulatory framework for CBD products, this could delay the development of a regulatory regime for CBD and have an adverse effect on the business of the Company. In addition, it is possible a new framework could impose additional regulatory requirements for the marketing of CBD products, which may have an adverse impact on the business of the Company.
The FTC may take enforcement actions against companies selling CBD products, including the Company. The FTC and the FDA often coordinate enforcement efforts where the agencies have overlapping jurisdiction, including with respect to the advertising, labeling, and promotion of food, cosmetics, medical devices, and OTC drugs. In the CBD product marketplace, the FTC has joined the FDA in the issuance of a number of warning letters to companies warning that the company’s advertisements were not supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence and thus violate the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41 et. seq. The FTC has also issued independent warning letters to companies selling CBD products. These warning letters allege that companies make exaggerated or false and misleading claims about their CBD products without rigorous scientific evidence to substantiate the claims. While historically, the FTC enforcement actions related to CBD have been limited to warning letters, in December 2020, the FTC initiated its first law enforcement administrative action against six companies selling CBD products. These companies were alleged to have violated the FTC Act by allegedly making unsupported health claims. The FTC entered into settlement agreements with these companies, which required, among other things, that the companies stop making such unsupported health claims and pay a monetary judgment to the FTC. The FTC’s enforcement was publicized by the agency as part of its ongoing effort to protect consumers from false, deceptive, and misleading health claims made in advertisements on websites and through social media companies. An additional enforcement action against a CBD company was announced in May 2021. Further, on December 20, 2022, the FTC released a Health Products Compliance Guidance that covers all health-related product advertising and to substantiate health-related claims that emphasizes the need to support health-related claims with high quality randomized, placebo-controlled human clinical trials, which may signal the FTC is preparing to more closely scrutinize such claims compared to previous years. The unknowns and associated risks of potential future FTC enforcement actions create risk for the Company’s business.
The DEA Interpretation of the 2018 Farm Bill could cause the DEA to take enforcement action against the Company’s intermediate hemp products. Through the DEA IFR, the DEA takes the position that material that exceeds 0.3% delta-9 THC remains controlled in Schedule I of the CSA, regardless of its status as in-process material that may only temporarily have a THC content over 0.3%. The DEA IFR may create risk for the Company’s business. Enforcement of the DEA IFR, or any Final Rule that carries forward the rulemaking in the DEA Rule, may result in, among other things, injunctions, product withdrawals, recalls, product seizures, fines, and criminal prosecutions. Additionally, enforcement of the DEA IFR could jeopardize the legality of the Company’s intermediate hemp products, such as in-process hemp extract that is incorporated in the Company’s finished products. Such enforcement would not only disrupt the Company’s operations, but it would also constrict the Company’s supply chain.
Any inability to obtain required regulatory approval and permits could limit the Company’s ability to conduct its business. The Company may be required to obtain and maintain certain permits, licenses and approvals in the jurisdictions where its products are sold. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain or maintain any necessary licenses, permits or approvals. Any material delay or inability to receive these items is likely to delay and/or inhibit the Company’s ability to conduct its business, and would have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company is subject to environmental, health and safety laws, compliance with such laws may be costly, and any failure to comply with such laws could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations or financial position. The Company is subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which the Company operates. Such regulations govern, among other things, emissions of pollutants into the air, wastewater discharges, waste disposal, the investigation and remediation of soil and groundwater contamination, and the health and safety of the Company’s employees. For example, the Company’s products and the raw materials used in its production processes are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations. The Company may be required to obtain environmental permits from governmental authorities for certain of its current or proposed operations. The Company may not have been, nor may it be able to be at all times, in full compliance with such laws, regulations and permits. If the Company violates or fails to comply with these laws, regulations or permits, the Company could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators.
As with other companies engaged in similar activities, or that own or operate real property, the Company faces inherent risks of environmental liability at its current and historical production sites. Certain environmental laws impose strict and, in certain circumstances, joint and several liability on current or previous owners or operators of real property for the cost of the investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous substances as well as liability for related damages to natural resources. In addition, the Company may discover
29
new facts or conditions that may change its expectations, or be faced with changes in environmental laws or their enforcement that would increase its liabilities.
The Company’s costs of complying with current and future environmental and health and safety laws, liabilities arising from past or future releases of, or exposure to, regulated materials, or more vigorous enforcement of environmental and employee health and safety laws, may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Regulatory uncertainty with respect to anti-money laundering laws and regulations impact on the CBD and marijuana-related businesses, if revised or resolved unfavorably to the Company’s interests, may have an adverse effect on the Company’s business. The Company is subject to a variety of laws and regulations in Canada and the United States and elsewhere that involve money laundering, financial recordkeeping and proceeds of crime, including the U.S. Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 (commonly known as the "Bank Secrecy Act"), as amended by Title III of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 ("USA Patriot Act"), the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (Canada), the Criminal Code ("Canada"), as amended and the rules and regulations thereunder, and any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines, issued, administered or enforced by governmental authorities in the United States and Canada.
In February 2014, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") of the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a memorandum providing instructions to banks seeking to provide services to marijuana related businesses (the "FinCEN Memo"). The FinCEN Memo states that in some circumstances, it may not be appropriate to prosecute banks that provide services to marijuana-related businesses for violations of federal money laundering laws. It refers to supplementary guidance that Deputy Attorney General Cole issued to federal prosecutors relating to the prosecution of money laundering offenses predicated on cannabis-related violations of the CSA. It is unclear at this time whether the current administration will follow the guidelines of the FinCEN Memo. Under U.S. federal law, banks or other financial institutions that provide a cannabis-related business with a checking account, debit or credit card, small business loan, or any other service could be found guilty of money laundering, aiding and abetting, or conspiracy.
On December 3, 2019, the Federal Reserve Board, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FinCEN, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in consultation with the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, issued a statement to provide clarity regarding the legal status of commercial growth and production of hemp and relevant requirements for banks under the Bank Secrecy Act. The statement emphasized that banks were no longer required to file suspicious activity reports for customers solely because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. On June 29, 2020, FinCEN issued a guidance document explaining how financial institutions can conduct due diligence for hemp-related businesses. Regulatory uncertainty in respect of the laws, rules, regulations and directives facing banks which provide services to CBD and cannabis industry participants, if revised or resolved unfavorably to the Company’s interest, may materially and adversely affect the business of the Company.
If any of the Company’s investments, or any proceeds thereof, any dividends or distributions therefrom, or any profits or revenues accruing from such investments in the United States or Canada were found to be in violation of money laundering legislation or otherwise, such transactions may be viewed as proceeds of crime under one or more of the statutes noted above or any other applicable legislation. This could restrict or otherwise jeopardize the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends, effect other distributions or subsequently repatriate such funds back to Canada. Furthermore, while the Company has no current intention to declare or pay dividends on its Common Shares in the foreseeable future, the Company may decide or be required to suspend declaring or paying dividends without advance notice and for an indefinite period of time.
The Company could be adversely affected by violations of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (Canada), the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other similar anti-bribery laws. The Company's business is subject to the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (Canada) and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") and other similar laws which generally prohibit companies and employees from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. In addition, the Company is or will be subject to the anti-bribery laws of any other countries in which it conducts business now or in the future. The Company's employees or other agents may, without its knowledge and despite its efforts, engage in conduct prohibited under its policies and procedures and under anti-bribery laws, for which it may be held responsible. The Company's policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. However, there can be no assurance that the Company's internal control policies and procedures will always protect it from recklessness, fraudulent behavior, dishonesty or other inappropriate acts committed by the Company's affiliates, employees, contractors or agents. If the Company's employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, it could suffer severe penalties and other consequences that may have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
30
As a marijuana/cannabis related business, the Company may have difficulty accessing banking services due to the illegality of marijuana under federal law. Since the production and possession of cannabis is currently illegal under U.S. federal law and the Company relies on exemptions promulgated pursuant to the 2018 Farm Bill, it is possible that banks may refuse to open bank accounts for the deposit of funds from businesses adjacent to the cannabis industry. The inability to open bank accounts with certain institutions could materially and adversely affect the business of the Company.
On December 3, 2019, the Federal Reserve Board, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FinCEN, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in consultation with the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, issued a statement to provide clarity regarding the legal status of commercial growth and production of hemp and relevant requirements for banks under the Bank Secrecy Act. The statement emphasized that banks were no longer required to file suspicious activity reports for customers solely because they are engaged in the growth or cultivation of hemp in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Regulatory uncertainty in respect of the laws, rules, regulations and directives facing banks which provide services to CBD and cannabis industry participants, if revised or resolved unfavorably to the Company’s interest, may materially and adversely affect the business of the Company.
The Company may have difficulty accessing public and private capital and banking services, which could negatively impact its ability to finance its operations. The Company anticipates that funding sources may be available pursuant to private and public offerings of equity and/or debt and bank lending. However, if equity and/or debt financing was not available in the public capital markets, then the Company expects that it would have access to raise equity and/or debt financing through private placement including possible strategic partnerships. Commercial banks, private equity firms and venture capital firms have approached the cannabis industry cautiously to date. Although there has been an increase in the amount of financing available to companies in the cannabis industry over the last several years, there is neither a broad nor deep pool of institutional capital that is available to cannabis industry participants. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if raised privately or publicly, will be available to the Company when needed or on acceptable terms. The Company’s inability to raise financing to fund capital expenditures or acquisitions could limit its growth and may have a material adverse effect upon future profitability. If the Company cannot achieve profitability, it may be forced to cease operations and investors may suffer a total loss of investment.
The Company could be liable for fraudulent or illegal activity by its employees, contractors and consultants resulting in significant financial losses due to claims against the Company. The Company is exposed to the risk that its employees, independent contractors and consultants may engage in fraudulent or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to the Company that violates: (i) government regulations; (ii) manufacturing standards; (iii) U.S. federal fraud and abuse laws and regulations; or (iv) laws that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data. It is not always possible for the Company to identify and deter misconduct by its employees and other third parties, and the precautions taken by the Company to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting the Company from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against the Company, and it is not successful in defending itself or asserting its rights, those actions could have a significant impact on its business, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, the curtailment of the Company’s operations or asset seizures, any of which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to the Company’s Business and Industry
The Company faces security risks related to its physical facilities. The Company may be an attractive target for criminals seeking to steal product, cash, or property, or to vandalize or destroy property or even cause physical harm to others. In particular, would-be criminals may confuse the Company’s products for marijuana, a controlled substance with an underground market, or take interest in the expensive equipment or technology used by the Company or its contract manufacturers. Accordingly, the Company’s operations may raise its profile and increase the probability of break-ins, theft, or vandalism, and there can be no assurance that the measures employed by the Company to prevent theft, vandalism, attack, or other criminal behavior will be successful. The Company may not be able to secure insurance coverage for losses incurred in connection with such activities on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Any criminal activities could have a negative impact on the Company and its businesses, and the inability or failure to obtain adequate insurance coverage would worsen the impact.
The Company depends on the success of its products, and those products may not achieve the desired market acceptance. If the products the Company sells are not perceived to have the effects intended by the consumer, its business may suffer. Many of the Company’s
31
products contain innovative ingredients or combinations of ingredients. There is limited long-term data with respect to potential therapeutic use or safety in humans or animals. As a result, the Company’s products could have certain side effects if not taken as directed or if taken by a consumer that has certain known or unknown medical conditions.
There is no assurance that the Company’s cash flows and debt or other financing will be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had total current liabilities of $15,936 and $23,646 respectively, and cash and cash equivalents of $22,618 and $47,820, respectively, to meet its current obligations. The Company’s ability to fund operating expenses and capital expenditures will depend on its future operating performance and there are no assurances that the Company will be able to access debt or other financing. If the Company is unable to achieve targeted operating performance or raise additional capital or debt financing on favorable terms, if at all, the Company may be forced to decelerate or curtail certain of its operations until such time as additional debt or capital financing becomes available.
See "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources" for additional discussion regarding its liquidity position.
The Company’s products have a limited shelf life and product inventory may reach its expiration prior to sale. The Company holds goods in inventory and its products have a limited shelf life. Its inventory may reach its expiration date and not be sold. Although the Company manages its inventory, it may be required to write-down the value of any inventory that has reached its expiration date, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Company’s quality control systems may not prove successful. The quality of the Company’s products is critical to the success of its business and operations. As such, it is imperative that the Company’s (and its service provider’s) quality control systems operate effectively and successfully. Quality control systems can be negatively impacted by their design, the quality training program, and adherence by employees to quality control guidelines. Although the Company strives to ensure that all of its service providers have implemented and adhere to high caliber quality control systems, any significant failure or deterioration of such quality control systems could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and operating results.
The Company depends on various third parties for the supply, manufacture, and testing of some of the Company’s products. No assurance can be given that these relationships will continue on favorable terms, or at all. The Company intends to maintain a full supply chain for the material portions of the production and distribution process of its products. The Company’s suppliers, service providers and distributors may elect, at any time, to breach or otherwise cease to participate in supply, service or distribution agreements, or other relationships, on which the Company’s operations rely. Loss of its suppliers, service providers or distributors would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and operational results.
The Company currently relies on certain third-party manufacturers. Disruption of operations at any of these facilities could adversely affect inventory supplies and the Company’s ability to meet product delivery deadlines.
The Company currently relies on a single manufacturer, Aidance, to manufacture its CBD CLINIC and CBD MEDIC products. Accordingly, the Company is highly dependent on the uninterrupted and efficient operation of Aidance’s manufacturing facility. Aidance may not continue to maintain its FDA registration or continue or be willing or able to produce the products at reasonable prices, or at all. If for any reason Aidance discontinues production of the CBD CLINIC or CBD MEDIC products, it would likely result in significant delays in production of products and interruption of the Company’s sales as it seeks to establish a relationship and commence production with another manufacturer. The Company may be unable to make satisfactory production arrangements with another manufacturer on a timely basis or at all. If operations at Aidance’s manufacturing plant were to be disrupted as a result of equipment failures, natural disasters, fires, accidents, work stoppages, power outages or other reasons, the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, the Company depends on third parties to obtain certain raw materials, including CBD necessary to develop and produce its products. The raw materials required to produce the Company’s products may not be available to the Company on favorable pricing terms in the future or at all when they are needed. If the Company is no longer able to obtain raw materials from one or more of its suppliers on terms reasonable to the Company, or at all, the Company’s revenues, business, financial condition, and operations would be negatively affected. This could also have a significant impact on the Company’s capacity to complete certain of its current or projected R&D projects and, accordingly, would negatively affect its projected commercial and financial growth. Any significant increase in the price of raw materials that cannot be passed on to the Company’s customers could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of
32
operations or financial condition. While potential alternative suppliers of raw materials may be identified, they must first pass intensive validation tests to ensure their compliance with product specifications. No assurance can be given regarding the successful outcomes of such tests or the Company’s ability to secure alternate sources of supply at competitive pricing and upon fair and reasonable contractual terms and conditions.
Part of the Company’s strategy is to enter into and maintain arrangements with third parties related to the development, testing, marketing, manufacture, distribution and commercialization of its products. The Company’s revenues are dependent on the successful efforts of these third parties, including the efforts of the Company’s distribution partners. Entering into strategic relationships can be a complex process and the interests of the Company’s distribution partners may not be or remain aligned with the Company’s interests. Some of the Company’s current and future distribution partners may decide to compete with the Company, refuse or be unable to fulfill or honor their contractual obligations to the Company, or change their plans to reduce their commitment to, or even abandon, their relationships with the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company’s distribution partners will market the Company’s products successfully or that any such third-party collaboration will be on favorable terms.
The profit margins of the Company and the timely delivery of its products are dependent upon the ability of its outside suppliers and manufacturers to supply it with products in a timely and cost-efficient manner. The Company’s ability to develop its business, enter new markets, and sustain satisfactory levels of sales in each market depends upon the ability of its outside suppliers and manufacturers to produce the ingredients and products and comply with all applicable regulations. The failure of the Company’s primary suppliers or manufacturers to supply ingredients or produce its products could adversely affect its business operations.
The Company’s manufacturers and suppliers must meet cGMP requirements and failure on their part to do so could have adverse consequences for the Company. All manufacturers and suppliers must comply with applicable cGMP regulations for the manufacture of the Company’s products, which are enforced by the FDA through its facilities inspection program. The FDA may conduct inspections of the Company’s manufacturing facility or third-party manufacturers to assure they are in compliance with such regulations. These cGMP requirements include quality control, quality assurance and the maintenance of records and documentation, among other items. The Company’s manufacturing facility or third-party manufacturers may be unable to comply with these cGMP requirements and with other regulatory requirements. A failure to comply with these requirements may result in fines, product recalls or seizures and related publicity requirements, injunctions, total or partial suspension of production, civil penalties, warning or untitled letters, Form 483s, import or export bans or restrictions, and criminal prosecution and penalties. Any of these penalties could delay or prevent the promotion, marketing or sale of certain of the Company’s products. If the safety of any products supplied to the Company is compromised due to a third-party manufacturer’s failure to adhere to applicable laws or for other reasons, the Company may not be able to successfully sell its products. The Company cannot assure that its third-party manufacturers will continue to reliably supply products to the Company at the levels of quality or the quantities it requires and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including cGMP requirements.
The Company’s manufacturers and suppliers must remain in compliance with the hemp production and manufacturing laws of the states in which they operate. State laws governing the production and manufacturing of hemp are different from state to state. The companies the Company contracts with as suppliers and manufacturers of its products are subject to the hemp-related laws and regulations of their state, as well as USDA regulations. Failure of any of the Company’s production or manufacturing partners to stay in compliance with the laws and regulations of their state may threaten their operations and the Company’s supply and manufacturing expectations. If any of the Company’s production or manufacturing partners must cease operations temporarily or permanently due to a regulatory violation or failure to maintain their permits and licenses in good standing, it could adversely affect the Company’s business operations.
If product liability claims are brought against the Company, it could incur substantial liabilities. The Company’s products will be produced for sale directly to end consumers, and therefore there is an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims, regulatory action and litigation if the products are alleged to have caused loss or injury. In addition, the production and sale of the Company’s products involves the risk of injury to end consumers due to tampering by unauthorized third parties or product contamination. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from human or animal consumption of the Company’s products alone or in combination with other medications or substances could occur. The Company may be subject to various product liability claims, including, among others, that its products caused injury or illness, include inadequate instructions for use or include inadequate warnings concerning possible side effects or interactions with other substances. A product liability claim or regulatory action against the Company could result in increased costs, could adversely affect the Company’s reputation, and could have a material adverse effect on its business and operational results.
The Company's operations and industry may be subject to reputational risk. Public opinion and perception on the use of CBD is inconsistent and may be negatively influenced by future clinical research or media reports that may be unfavorable to CBD, which may
33
have an adverse effect on public opinion and the demand for the Company’s products. The Company believes that the CBD industry (and the cannabis industry in general) is highly dependent upon consumer perception regarding the safety, efficacy and quality of the products. Consumer perception can be significantly influenced by scientific research or findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention and other publicity regarding the consumption of CBD or cannabis products. There can be no assurance that future scientific research, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other research findings or publicity will be favorable to the CBD or cannabis markets or any particular product, or consistent with currently held views. Future research reports, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other publicity that are perceived as less favorable than, or that question, earlier research reports, findings or publicity could have a material adverse effect on the cannabis industry and demand for its products and services, which could impact the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations and cash flows. The Company’s dependence upon consumer perception means that adverse scientific research reports, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other publicity, whether or not accurate or with merit, could have a material adverse impact on the Company, its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Further, adverse publicity, reports or other media attention regarding the safety, potential therapeutic use, and quality of CBD or cannabis in general, or the Company’s products specifically, or associating the consumption of CBD or cannabis with illness or other negative effects or events, could have a material adverse effect. Such adverse publicity reports or other media attention could arise even if the adverse effects associated with such products resulted from consumers’ failure to consume such products legally, appropriately, or as directed.
Certain international jurisdictions in which the Company may sell products may not differentiate between hemp and recreational or medical marijuana. In particular, the Company's products may be categorized and labelled as marijuana, medical marijuana or a similar category notwithstanding that the product is, by U.S. regulatory standards, an industrial hemp-based product. This may cause confusion among customers, industry partners such as financial institutions, institutional investors, retailers and distributors as well as other parties upon whom the Company's business relies.
The Company is dependent upon agricultural production of hemp for part of the Company’s operations, which are subject to seasonal and weather-related risks. The Company’s business can be affected by unusual weather patterns. The production of some of the Company’s products relies on the availability and use of live plant material, which is grown in Arizona, Colorado, Kentucky and Canada. Growing periods can be impacted by weather patterns and these unpredictable weather patterns may impact the Company's ability to harvest its industrial hemp and produce products. In addition, severe weather, including drought, fire, hail and freezing temperatures, can destroy a crop, which could result in the Company having no or limited hemp to process. If the Company is unable to harvest hemp through its proprietary operations or contract farming arrangements, its ability to meet customer demand, generate sales, and maintain operations could be impacted. Given the proprietary nature of the Company’s crops, it may not be practicable for the Company to source adequate, or any, replacement hemp to produce some downstream products.
The Company’s business is dependent on the outdoor growth and production of hemp, an agricultural product. As such, the risks inherent in engaging in agricultural businesses apply. Potential risks include the risk that crops may become diseased or victim to insects, fungus or other pests or contaminants; subject to extreme weather conditions such as excess rainfall, hail, freezing temperature or drought; wild and domestic animal conflicts; and crop-raiding, sabotage or vandalism—all of which could result in low crop yields, decreased availability of industrial hemp, inadequate inventory levels for future expected growth, and higher acquisition prices. Climate change may increase the frequency or intensity of extreme weather such as storms, floods, heat waves, droughts and other events that could affect the quality, volume and cost of seed produced for sale as well as demand and product mix. Climate change may also affect the availability and suitability of arable land and contribute to unpredictable shifts in the average growing season and types of crops produced. The Company may also encounter difficulties with the importation of agro-inputs and securing a supply of spares and maintenance items. In the event of a delay in the delivery from suppliers of agro-inputs and machinery, the Company may be unable to achieve its production targets. There can be no guarantee that an agricultural event will not adversely impact the business and operating results.
There may be adverse consequences to the Company's end users should they test positive for trace amounts of THC attributed to use of the Company's products. The Company's products are made from cannabis, which contains THC. As a result, certain of the Company's products contain low levels of THC. THC is considered a banned substance in many jurisdictions. Moreover, the regulatory framework for legal amounts of consumed THC is evolving. Whether or not ingestion of THC (at low levels or otherwise) is permitted in a particular jurisdiction, there may be adverse consequences to end users who test positive for trace amounts of THC attributed to use of the Company's products. In addition, certain metabolic processes in the body may cause certain molecules to convert to other molecules which may negatively affect the results of drug tests. Positive tests may adversely affect the end user's reputation, ability to obtain or retain
34
employment and participation in certain athletic or other activities. A claim or regulatory action against the Company based on such positive test results could adversely affect the Company's reputation and could have a material adverse effect on its business and operational results.
The Company may be unable to obtain adequate crop insurance. The Company may not be able to obtain crop insurance at economically feasible rates, on acceptable terms, or at all. As a result, the Company may have limited or no recourse in the event of a failed crop or other event that standard crop insurance would typically insure against. Such inability may adversely impact the Company’s business and operating results.
The Company may be unable to obtain or maintain high quality farmland sufficient for its hemp cultivation needs. The Company may be unable to maintain or obtain high quality farmland in sufficient acreage to support production levels or sustained accelerated growth. Moreover, where farmland is available in sufficient acreage, it may not be available at rental rates or otherwise on acceptable economic terms. Inability to obtain sufficient farmland for operations (with or without significant product demand growth) could negatively affect the Company’s operations and financial condition.
The agricultural landscape continues to evolve as a result of factors including farm and industry consolidation, agricultural productivity and development, and climate change. Farm consolidation in the United States and other developed markets has been ongoing for decades, It is expected to continue as grower demographics shift and advancements in innovative technology and equipment enable farmers to manage larger operations to create economies of scale in a lower-margin, more capital-intensive environment. Increased consolidation in the crop nutrient industry has resulted in greater resources dedicated to expansion and R&D opportunities, leading to increased competition in advanced product offerings and innovative technologies. Some of these competitors have greater total resources or are state-supported, which makes them less vulnerable to industry downturns and better positioned to pursue new expansion and development opportunities.
The advancement and adoption of technology and digital innovations in agriculture and across the value chain have increased and are expected to further accelerate as grower demographics shift and pressures from consumer preferences, governments and climate change initiatives evolve. The development of seeds that require less crop nutrients, development of full or partial substitutes for the Company’s products or developments in the application of crop nutrients such as improved nutrient use or efficiency through use of precision agriculture could also emerge, all of which have the potential to adversely affect the demand for the Company’s products and results of operations.
Climate change could exacerbate certain of the risks inherent in the Company’s agricultural operations. Climate change could result in increasing frequency and severity of weather-related events, fires, resource shortages, changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages and changing temperatures, any of which can damage or destroy crops, resulting in the Company having no or limited hemp to process. If the Company is unable to harvest hemp through its proprietary operations or contract farming arrangements, its ability to meet customer demand, generate sales, and maintain operations will be impacted. Furthermore, severe weather-related events may result in substantial costs to the Company, including costs to respond during the event, to recover from the event, and to possibly modify existing or future infrastructure requirements to prevent recurrence. Climate changes could also disrupt the Company’s operations by impacting the availability and costs of materials needed for production and could increase insurance and other operating costs.
A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are introducing regulatory changes in response to concerns about the potential impact of climate change. The Company faces the risk that its operations could be subject to government initiatives aimed at countering climate change, which could impose constraints on the Company’s operations, for example, due to increased costs for fossil fuels, electricity and transportation and costs associated with monitoring and reporting.
Hemp is subject to specific agricultural risks, which could negatively impact the Company’s cultivation efforts. Hemp plants can be vulnerable to various pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, viruses and other miscellaneous pathogens. Such instances often lead to reduced crop quality, stunted growth and/or death of the plant. Moreover, hemp is phytoremediative, meaning that it may extract toxins or other undesirable chemicals or compounds from the ground in which it is planted. Furthermore, hemp is cultivated in agricultural growing regions across the US, which plant heavily in seed, row and vegetable crops. While the Company uses certified organic practices, conventional neighbors may use harmful chemicals that can cause drift or water contamination risk of unwanted contaminants in the Company's harvested hemp biomass. Various regulatory agencies have established maximum limits for pathogens, toxins, chemicals and other compounds that may be present in agricultural materials. If the Company’s hemp is found to have levels of pathogens, toxins, chemicals or other undesirable compounds that exceed established limits, the Company may have to destroy the applicable portions of its hemp crop. Furthermore, if the Company’s crops in any state in which it operates are tested by a regulator and found to contain more than
35
0.3% THC on a dry weight basis, significant portions of the crops may be ordered to be destroyed. Should the Company’s crops be lost due to pathogens, toxins, chemicals, other undesirable compounds, or regulatory enforcement, it may have a material adverse impact on its business and financial condition.
The Company relies on third-parties for the transportation of its hemp and hemp-derived products; any delay or failure by these third-parties to meet the Company’s transport needs could impact the Company’s operations and financial performance. In order for the Company's customers to receive its product, the Company relies on third-party transportation services. This can cause logistical problems with, and delays in, end consumers obtaining fulfillment of their orders, which the Company cannot control. Any delay by third-party transportation services may adversely affect the Company’s financial performance.
The Company faces risks related to the transportation of hemp and hemp-derived products and its reliance on third-party transportation services. These risks include, but are not limited to, risks resulting from the continually evolving federal and state regulatory environment governing hemp production, THC testing, and transportation.
Moreover, transportation to and from the Company’s facilities is critical. A breach of security during transport could have material adverse effects on the Company’s business, financials and prospects. Any such breach could impact the Company’s operations and financial performance.
The Company faces intense competition. The number of competitors in the Company’s market segment has expanded and may continue to increase, which could negatively impact the Company’s market share and demand for products. The markets for businesses in the CBD and hemp extracts industries are competitive and evolving. In particular, the Company faces strong competition from both existing and emerging companies that offer similar but not full-spectrum products. Some of the Company’s current and potential competitors may have longer operating histories, greater financial, marketing and other resources, and larger customer bases.
Given the rapid changes affecting the global, national, and regional economies generally, and the hemp industry in particular, the Company may be unable to create and maintain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. The Company faces competition from companies outside the CBD and hemp oil industry from legitimate companies with more experience and financial resources than the Company has and from unlicensed and unregulated participants. In addition, the broader market for hemp-based products may soften, contract or remain stable, any of which may result in increased competition among market participants, including the Company. The Company’s success will depend on its ability to keep pace with any changes in the markets in which it operates, especially legal and regulatory changes and shifting consumer behavior. The Company’s success will also depend on its ability to respond to, among other things, changes in the economy, market conditions, and regulatory and competitive pressures. Any failure by the Company to anticipate or respond adequately to such changes could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, operating results, liquidity, cash flow and operational performance.
The introduction of a recreational model for marijuana production and distribution in various jurisdictions may cause producers in those jurisdictions to expand beyond the medical marijuana market and compete with the Company’s products. The impact of this potential development may be negative for the Company and could result in increased levels of competition in its existing market and/or the entry of new competitors into the overall hemp market in which the Company operates.
There is potential that the Company will face intense competition from other companies, some of which can be expected to have longer operating histories, more financial resources, and more manufacturing and marketing experience than the Company. Increased competition from larger and better-financed competitors could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
The Company also faces competition from producers who may not comply with applicable regulations. As a result, such producers may have lower operating costs, make impermissible claims and utilize other competitive advantages based on circumvention of regulatory requirements. The Company will require continued significant investment in R&D, marketing, sales, and customer support to remain competitive. The Company may not have sufficient resources to maintain R&D, marketing, sales, and customer support efforts on a competitive basis, which could materially and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
The legal landscape for the Company’s products is changing internationally. More countries have passed laws that allow for the production and distribution of cannabis in some form or another. Increased international competition might lower the demand for the Company’s products on a global scale.
36
Changing consumer preferences could impact the Company’s ability to attract and retain customers. As a result of changing consumer preferences, many dietary supplements and other innovative products attain financial success for a time. Even if the Company’s products find retail success, there can be no assurance that any of its products will continue to see extended financial success. The Company’s success will be depend on its ability to price, develop new, and improve product lines. Even if the Company successfully introduces new products or further develops current products, a failure to properly price or update products with compelling content could cause a decline in its popularity, reducing revenues and harming the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. Failure to introduce new features and product lines and to achieve and sustain market acceptance could result in the Company being unable to meet consumer preferences and generate revenue, which would have a material adverse impact on its profitability and financial results from operations.
The Company’s success depends on its ability to attract and retain customers. Many factors could impact the Company’s ability to attract and retain customers, including but not limited to the Company’s ability to continually produce desirable products, the successful implementation of the Company’s customer acquisition plan, and the continued growth in the aggregate number of people selecting CBD and botanical-based wellness products. The Company’s failure to acquire and retain customers could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and financial position.
The Company’s retail customers may not adequately support its products or its relationships with such retailers may deteriorate. The Company relies significantly on retailers to display, present and sell its products to consumers in their brick-and-mortar stores and through their online e-commerce sites. The Company’s retailers stock and display its products, and, in certain health food and other specialty stores, also explain the attributes and health benefits of its products. The Company’s relationships with these retailers and their e-commerce platforms are important for maintaining and building consumer trust in its brands and for executing the advertising and educational programs the Company continues to deploy. The Company’s failure to maintain these relationships with its retailers and platforms, or difficulties experienced by these groups, could harm the Company’s business.
The Company does not receive long-term purchase commitments from its retailers, and confirmed orders received from retail partners may be difficult to enforce. In some instances, it is obliged to accept returned inventory. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able, in the future, to continue to sell its products to its retail customers on favorable trading terms or at all. The Company may be obligated to stop shipments to its retail customers, or such customers may refuse shipments from the Company while negotiating the resolution of trading issues with such customers. Factors that could affect the Company’s ability to maintain or expand its sales to these retailers include: (i) failure to accurately identify the needs of the Company’s customers; (ii) lack of customer acceptance of new products or product expansions; (iii) unwillingness of the Company’s retailers to attribute premium value to the Company’s existing and new products relative to competing products; (iv) failure to obtain shelf space from retailers; and (v) new, well-received product introductions by competitors. In part, the Company’s sales depend on retailers effectively displaying its products, including providing attractive space in their stores, including online e-commerce platforms, and, in certain channels, having knowledgeable employees that can explain the Company’s products and their benefits. If the Company loses any of its key retailers, or if any key retailer reduces their purchases of the Company’s existing or new products, reduces their number of stores or operations, promotes products of competitors over the Company, or suffers financial difficulty or insolvency, the Company may experience reduced sales of its products, resulting in lower revenue and gross profit margin, which would harm the Company’s profitability and financial condition.
The Company depends on the popularity and acceptance of its brand portfolio. Management believes maintaining and promoting the Company’s brand is critical to expanding its customer base. Maintaining and promoting the Company’s brand will depend largely on its ability to continue to provide quality, reliable and innovative products, which it may not do successfully. The Company may introduce new products that customers do not like, which may negatively affect the brands and reputation. Maintaining and enhancing the Company’s brands may require it to make substantial investments, which may not achieve the desired goals. If the Company fails to promote and maintain its brand successfully, or if there are excessive expenses in this effort, its business and financial results from operations could be materially adversely affected.
Supply chain issues, including significant price fluctuations or shortages of materials, and distribution challenges may increase the Company’s cost of goods sold and cause its results of operations and financial condition to suffer. If the Company is unable to secure materials at a reasonable price, it may have to alter or discontinue selling some of its products or attempt to pass along the cost to its customers, any of which could adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition.
Additionally, any significant interruption in or increasing labor, freight and energy costs could increase the Company’s and its suppliers’ cost of goods and have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results from operations. If the Company’s suppliers are affected by increases labor, freight and energy costs, they may attempt to pass these cost increases on to the Company. If the Company
37
pays such increases, it may not be able to offset them through increases in its pricing. The direct and indirect impacts of the Company’s ability to secure materials and move products could adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition.
The Company may not be able to successfully implement its growth strategy on a timely basis, or at all. The Company’s future success depends, in part, on its ability to implement its growth strategy, including (i) brand product innovations within existing categories and growth into adjacent categories and continued growth of existing products in existing categories; (ii) further penetration into new products and channels; (iii) expansion into select international markets; and (iv) in support of its profitability targets, improvements in the Company’s operating income, gross profit and Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA") margins. The Company’s ability to implement this growth strategy depends, among other things, on its ability to:
•selectively innovate with new products, product line extensions and formats that appeal to consumers and will be supported by retailers and distributors;
•increase consumer traffic to the Company's e-commerce sales portal through paid and earned media, SEO, and expanded consumer experiences;
•maintain and expand brand loyalty and brand recognition by effectively implementing its marketing strategy and advertising initiatives;
•maintain and improve its competitive position with the Company’s brands in the channels in which it competes through the growth of availability and customer-facing initiatives;
•identify and successfully enter and market the Company’s products in new consumer channels, geographic markets, and market segments and categories; enter into successful distribution arrangements with new distributors and retailers of its products;
•selectively develop and expand in new and existing international markets efficiently and cost-effectively with supportive distribution partners;
•maintain and, to the extent necessary, improve the Company’s high standards for product quality, safety and integrity;
•simplify, rationalize and maximize the Company's existing product portfolio;
•successfully and efficiently scale up operations in the Company’s manufacturing and distribution processes to buoy improvements in the Company’s operating income, gross profit and Adjusted EBITDA margins; and
•maintain sources for the required supply of quality raw ingredients to meet the Company’s growing demand.
The Company may not be able to successfully implement its growth strategy and reach its revenue and profitability improvement targets.
The market for the Company's products and industry is difficult to forecast due to limited and unreliable market data. The Company will need to rely largely on its own market research to forecast industry trends and statistics as detailed forecasts are, with certain exceptions, not generally available from other sources at this stage of the hemp industry. A failure in the demand for the Company’s products to materialize as a result of competition, technological change, change in the regulatory or legal landscape, or other factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company depends on key personnel and its ability to attract and retain employees. The Company's success and future growth will depend, to a significant degree, on the continued efforts of the Company’s directors and officers to develop the business and manage operations and on their ability to attract and retain key technical, scientific, sales, and marketing staff or consultants. The loss of any key person or the inability to attract and retain new key personnel could have a material adverse effect on the business and financial results from operations. The U.S. hemp and cannabis industries may have more stringent requirements for personnel, including but not limited to requirements that they complete criminal background checks, submit financial information, and demonstrate proof of residency, which may make it more challenging for the Company to hire and retain employees. Competition for qualified technical, scientific, sales, and marketing staff, as well as officers and directors, can be intense, and no assurance can be provided that the Company will be able to attract or retain key personnel in the future. From time to time, share-based compensation may comprise a significant component of the
38
Company’s compensation for key personnel. If the price of the Common Shares declines, it may be challenging to recruit and retain such individuals.
Executive and other management transitions can be inherently difficult to manage, cause significant and costly disruption to the Company's business, lead to additional departures of existing personnel, and have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition and internal controls over financial reporting.
From time to time, the Company may rely on debt financing for some of its business activities, and there can be no assurance the Company will be able to access such credit, or that it will be able to comply with the terms of such credit. From time to time, the Company may attempt to rely on debt financing for a portion of its business activities, including capital and operating expenditures. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to comply at all times with the covenants applicable under such types of debt arrangements; nor are there assurances that the Company will be able to secure new financing that may be necessary to finance its operations and capital growth program. Any failure of the Company to secure financing, to obtain new financing or to comply with applicable covenants could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results. Further, any inability of the Company to obtain new financing may limit its ability to support future growth.
The Company may have difficulty obtaining insurance to cover its operational risks. Due to the Company’s involvement in the hemp industry, it may have difficulty obtaining the various insurances that are desired to operate its business, which may expose the Company to additional risk and financial liability. Insurance that is otherwise readily available, such as general liability and directors’ and officers’ insurance, may be more difficult to find and more expensive because of the regulatory regime applicable to the industry. There are no guarantees that the Company will be able to find such insurance coverage in the future or that the cost will be affordable. If the Company is unable to obtain insurance coverage on acceptable terms, it may prevent it from entering into certain business sectors, may inhibit growth, and may expose the Company to additional risk and financial liabilities.
The Company may be subject to growth-related risks, including capacity constraints and pressure on its internal systems and controls. The ability of the Company to manage growth effectively will require it to continue to implement and improve its operational and financial systems and to expand, train and manage its employee base. The inability of the Company to deal with this growth may have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. In addition, specific risks are inherent in the growth of the Company’s business-to-business distribution and direct-to-consumer sales, including increased competition and risks related to the use of the Company’s information systems.
The Company may acquire other companies, which could divert management’s attention, result in additional dilution to the Company’s Shareholders and otherwise disrupt the Company and harm its operating results. The Company may acquire, partner, or otherwise transact with other companies in the future, and there are risks inherent in any such activities. Specifically, there could be unknown or undisclosed risks or liabilities of such companies for which the Company is not sufficiently indemnified. Any such unknown or undisclosed risks or liabilities could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial performance and results of operations. The Company could encounter additional transaction and integration-related costs or experience an impact on its operations or results of operation as a result of the failure to realize all of the anticipated benefits from such acquisitions or partnerships or an inability to integrate an acquisition as anticipated successfully. All of these factors could cause dilution to the Company’s earnings per Common Share or decrease or delay the anticipated accretive effect of the acquisition or partnership and cause a decrease in the market price of the Company’s securities or have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations or results from operations. The Company may be unable to successfully integrate and combine the operations, personnel, and technology infrastructure of any such acquired company with its existing operations. As a result of integration efforts, the Company may experience interruptions in its business activities, deterioration in its employee and customer relationships, increased costs of integration and harm to its reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company may experience difficulties combining corporate cultures, maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees. Integrating any such acquired companies may also impose substantial demands on the management of the Company. There is no assurance that these acquisitions will be successfully integrated in a timely manner or without additional expenses being incurred. In addition, the Company may be responsible for any legacy liabilities of businesses it acquires or be subject to additional liability in connection with other strategic transactions. The existence or amount of these liabilities may not be known at the time of acquisition or other strategic transactions and may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business.
39
In respect of potential future acquisitions or partnerships, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to identify acquisition or partnership opportunities that meet its strategic objectives or that it will be able to negotiate acceptable terms to the extent such opportunities are identified.
The Company’s intellectual property may be difficult to protect. The Company’s success is heavily dependent upon its intangible property and technology. The Company relies upon copyrights, patents, trade secrets, unpatented proprietary know-how and continuing innovation to protect the intangible property, technology and information that is considered important to the development of the business. The Company relies on various methods to protect its proprietary rights, including confidentiality agreements with consultants, service providers and management that contain terms and conditions prohibiting unauthorized use and disclosure of confidential information. However, despite efforts to protect intangible property rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or replicate intangible property, technology or processes. There can be no assurances that the steps taken by the Company to protect its intangible property, technology and information will be adequate to prevent misappropriation or independent third-party development of the Company’s intangible property, technology or processes. Other companies can likely duplicate a production process similar to the Company’s. Other companies may also be able to materially duplicate the Company’s proprietary plant strains. To the extent that any of the above would occur, revenue could be negatively affected. In the future, the Company may have to litigate to enforce its intangible property rights, which could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and the Company's resources.
The Company’s ability to successfully implement its business plan depends in part on its ability to obtain, maintain and build brand recognition using its trademarks, service marks, trade dress, domain names and other intellectual property rights, including the Company’s names and logos. If the Company’s efforts to protect its intellectual property are unsuccessful or inadequate, or if any third party misappropriates or infringes on its intellectual property, the value of its brands may be harmed, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and might prevent its brands from achieving or maintaining market acceptance.
The Company may be unable to obtain registrations for its intellectual property rights for various reasons, including refusal by regulatory authorities to register trademarks or other intellectual property protections, prior registrations of which it is not aware, or it may encounter claims from previous users of similar intellectual property in areas where it operates or intends to conduct operations. This could harm its image, brand or competitive position and cause the Company to incur significant penalties and costs.
The United States has enacted and implemented wide-ranging patent reform legislation. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to the Company's ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken the Company's ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents that it has licensed or that it might obtain in the future. Similarly, changes in patent law and regulations in other countries or jurisdictions or changes in the governmental bodies that enforce them or changes in how the relevant governmental authority enforces patent laws or regulations may weaken the Company's ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents that it has licensed or that it may obtain in the future. For example, the complexity and uncertainty of European patent laws have also increased in recent years. In Europe, a new unitary patent system was introduced in 2023, significantly impacting European patents, including those granted before the introduction of the new system. Under the unitary patent system, European applications can become a Unitary Patent upon the grant of a patent, which will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Unitary Patent Court (UPC). As the UPC is a new court system, there is no precedent for the court, increasing the uncertainty of any litigation. Patents granted before the implementation of the UPC have the option of opting out of the jurisdiction of the UPC and remaining as national patents in the UPC countries. Patents that remain under the jurisdiction of the UPC will be potentially vulnerable to a single UPC-based revocation challenge that, if successful, could invalidate the patent in all countries that are signatories to the UPC. The Company cannot predict with certainty the long-term effects of these changes.
Further, under certain circumstances, patent term covering the Company's products or product candidates may be extended for time spent during the pendency of the patent application in the U.S. PTO (referred to as PTA, or Patent Term Adjustment). The laws and regulations underlying how the PTO calculates the PTA are subject to change, and a third party could challenge any such PTA. If the Company does not prevail under such a challenge, the PTA may be reduced or eliminated, resulting in a shorter patent term, which may negatively impact its ability to exclude competitors. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently handed down a decision in the In re Cellect case that introduces particular uncertainty around PTA calculations. In that case, the court determined that patents with a term that exceeded the term of other patents in the same family—due to a PTA extension—were invalid for obvious-type double patenting. If that decision is not overturned or reversed by Congress, then any PTA in a patent that the Company has or will obtain in the future could be
40
vulnerable to similar invalidity challenges based on other earlier-expiring patents. While the In re Cellect case focused on such challenges from patents in the same family, the court did not address challenges to a PTA from patents in other families that the Company or others may own, and this creates additional uncertainty with respect to PTA calculations. Because a PTA added to the term of patents covering biological or pharmaceutical products and methods of their use have particular value, the Company business may be adversely affected if a third party successfully challenges the PTA, and its ability to exclude competitors is reduced or eliminated. In addition, for issued patents where the Company has a PTA, it may determine that it is prudent not to file additional applications in that family to preserve that PTA. Such a decision would negatively impact the Company's ability to obtain patents with a different scope from the same patent family, even though the Company could be otherwise entitled to such patent protection. If the Company does not obtain patents on all the subject matter that it is entitled to in its patent applications, the Company's ability to exclude competitors may be harmed.
In addition to changes in patents laws, geopolitical dynamics may also impact the Company's ability to obtain and enforce patents in particular jurisdictions. If the Company is unable to obtain and enforce patents as needed in particular markets, its ability to exclude competitors in those markets may be reduced.
Companies in the retail and wholesale consumer packaged goods industries frequently own trademarks and trade secrets and often enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intangible property rights. The Company may be subject to intangible property rights claims in the future, and its products may not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use. Any intangible property claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming and expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management resources and attention. An adverse determination also could prevent the Company from offering its products to others and may require it to procure substitute products or services for these members.
With respect to any intangible property rights claim, the Company may have to pay damages or stop using intangible property found to violate a third party’s rights. The Company may have to seek a license for the intangible property, which may not be available on reasonable terms and may significantly increase operating expenses. The technology also may not be available for license at all. As a result, the Company may also be required to pursue alternative options, which could require significant effort and expense. If the Company cannot license or obtain an alternative for the infringing aspects of its business, it may be forced to limit product offerings and be unable to compete effectively. These results could harm the Company’s brand and prevent it from generating sufficient revenue or achieving profitability.
The Company is involved in litigation, including class action litigation, and there may be additional litigation in the future in which it will be involved. The Company is currently involved in ordinary litigation. An adverse decision in any litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. The Company may become party to litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business, which could adversely affect the Company’s business. Should any litigation in which the Company becomes involved be determined against it, such a decision could materially adversely affect the Company’s ability to continue operating and the market price for the Common Shares and could use significant resources.
Furthermore, as a manufacturer, processor and distributor of products designed to be ingested by humans, the Company faces an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims, regulatory action and litigation if its products are alleged to have caused significant loss or injury. In addition, the manufacture and sale of the Company’s products involve the risk of consumer injury due to tampering by unauthorized third parties or product contamination. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from human consumption of the Company’s products alone or combined with other medications or substances could occur. Although the Company will have quality control procedures in place, it may be subject to various product liability claims, including, among others, that the products produced by the Company, or the products the Company will purchase from third-party licensed producers, caused injury, illness or death, include inadequate instructions for use or include inadequate warnings concerning possible side effects or interactions with other substances. A product liability claim or regulatory action against the Company could result in increased costs, adversely affect the Company’s reputation with its customers and consumers generally, and have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurances that the Company can obtain or maintain product liability insurance on acceptable terms or with adequate coverage against potential liabilities. Such insurance is expensive and may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. The inability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage on reasonable terms or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of the Company’s potential products.
Monitoring and defending against legal actions, whether or not meritorious, is time-consuming for management and detracts from management’s ability to focus internal resources on business activities fully. In addition, legal fees and costs incurred in connection with such activities may be significant. In the future, the Company could be subject to judgments or enter into settlements of claims for
41
significant monetary damages. A decision adverse to the interests of the Company could result in the payment of substantial damages. It could have a material adverse effect on cash flow, results of operations and financial position. With respect to any litigation, the Company’s insurance may not reimburse or be sufficient to reimburse the Company for the expenses or losses it may suffer in contesting and concluding such litigation. Even if successful, substantial litigation costs may adversely impact the Company’s business, operating results or financial condition.
Trade Secrets may be difficult to protect. The Company’s success depends upon the skills, knowledge and experience of its scientific and technical personnel, consultants, advisors, and contractors. Because the Company operates in a highly competitive industry, it relies in part on trade secrets to protect its proprietary products and processes. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. The Company enters into confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements with its corporate partners, employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, developers, and other advisors. These agreements generally require that the receiving party keep confidential and not disclose to third parties confidential information developed by the receiving party or made known to the receiving party by the Company during the receiving party’s relationship with the Company. These agreements also generally provide that inventions conceived by the receiving party wihle rendering services to the Company will be its exclusive property, and the Company enters into assignment agreements to perfect its rights.
These confidentiality, inventions and assignment agreements, where in place, may be breached and may not effectively assign intellectual property rights to the Company. The Company’s trade secrets could also be independently discovered by competitors, in which case the Company would not be able to prevent its competitors' use of such trade secrets. The enforcement of a claim alleging that a party illegally obtained and was using the Company’s trade secrets could be difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, and the outcome could be unpredictable. Failure to obtain or maintain effective trade secret protection could adversely affect the Company’s competitive position.
The Company’s status as a public benefit company and a Certified B Corp may not result in the benefits that the Company anticipates. The Company has elected to be classified as a "Benefit Company" under the BCBCA, in connection with which it will pursue the public benefits identified in its Articles. There is no assurance, however, that the expected positive impact from being a benefit company will be realized.
As a benefit company, the Company is required to disclose to Shareholders an annual benefit report outlining how the Company conducts its business responsibly and sustainably and how it promotes its public benefit. In addition, the Company’s directors and officers are required to act honestly and in good faith conduct business responsibly and sustainably and promote the Company’s public benefits, which must be balanced with their duty under the BCBCA to act honestly and in good faith in the best interests of the Company. If the Company is unable to provide this report in a timely manner, or if the report is not viewed favorably by the parties with which the Company does business, its regulators, or others reviewing its credentials, its reputation and status as a benefit company may be harmed.
In addition to being a benefit company, the Company has been certified by B Lab as a "Certified B Corp," referring to companies that are certified as meeting certain levels of social and environmental performance, accountability and transparency. The standards for Certified B Corporation certification are set by B Lab and may change over time. The Company’s continued certification is at the sole discretion of B Lab. To maintain certification, the Company is required to update its assessment and verify its updated score with B Lab every three years. The Company was first certified in August 2020 and re-certified in April 2024. There is no guarantee that the Company will continue to be re-certified. The Company’s reputation could be harmed if it loses its status as a Certified B Corp, whether by its choice or its failure to continue to meet the certification requirements. Likewise, the Company’s reputation could be harmed if its publicly reported Certified B Corp score declines.
As a public benefit company, the Company has a duty to balance a variety of interests that may result in actions that do not maximize Shareholder value. As a benefit company, the Company is required to balance the financial interests of its Shareholders with the best interests of those stakeholders materially affected by its conduct, including particularly those affected by the specific benefit purposes set forth in the Company’s Articles. Accordingly, being a benefit company and complying with the related obligations could negatively impact the Company’s ability to provide the highest possible return to its Shareholders.
As a benefit company under British Columbia law, the Company’s directors and officers are required to act honestly and in good faith with a view to conducting business responsibly and sustainably and promoting the Company’s public benefits, which must be balanced with their duty under the BCBCA to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. While the Company believes its public benefit designation and obligation will benefit Shareholders, in balancing these interests, the Board of Directors may
42
take actions that do not maximize Shareholder value. Any benefits to Shareholders resulting from the Company’s public benefit purposes may not materialize within the expected timeframe, or at all, and may have negative effects. For example:
•the Company may choose to revise its policies in ways that it believes will be beneficial to its stakeholders, including but not limited to, the Company’s Shareholders, employees, suppliers, creditors and consumers, as well as the government and the environment and the community and society in which the Company operates, even though the changes may be costly;
•the Company may take actions, such as making contributions to non-profit organizations and charities, which are made on an ad hoc basis, concentrating first on those entities that have historically supported the business through education of existing and potential customers. The Company also supports non-profits that it believes can utilize the wellness aspects of its products (i.e., military veterans, adaptive athletes, educational organizations, etc.). By doing so, the Company believes that socially oriented action will ultimately have a positive impact on the Company, even though these actions may be more costly than other alternatives;
•the Company may be influenced to pursue programs and services to demonstrate its commitment to the communities it serves even though there is no immediate return to its Shareholders; or
•in responding to a possible proposal to acquire the Company, the Board of Directors may be influenced by the interests of the Company’s stakeholders, including its employees, customers, the environment, and the communities where its employees live and where it does business, whose interests may be different from the interests of the Company’s Shareholders.
The Company may be unable or slow to realize the benefits it expects from actions taken to benefit its stakeholders, including farmers, suppliers, crew members and local communities, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, which in turn could cause the Company’s share price to decline. In the event of a conflict or dispute regarding the Company’s Board of Directors’ balancing of interests and the duty to act responsibly and sustainably, there is uncertainty as to how such a conflict may be resolved as British Columbia courts have not yet developed as substantive a body of law on this topic as with traditional director duties.
As a public benefit company, the Company may be subject to increased legal proceedings concerning its duty to balance Shareholder and public benefit interests, the occurrence of which may have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. As a British Columbia benefit company, the Company’s Shareholders (if they, individually or collectively, own at least 2% of the Company’s outstanding capital stock or shares having at least C$2 million in market value (whichever is less)) are entitled to commence a legal proceeding claiming that the Company’s directors failed to balance Shareholder and public benefit interests. However, the BCBCA clarifies that despite any rule of law to the contrary, a court may not order monetary damages in relation to any breach by the Company’s directors of these additional duties. This potential liability does not exist for traditional corporations. As a new class of corporate entity, there is uncertainty over how British Columbia courts would view a board’s balancing of interests as little jurisprudence exists to offer insights or guidance. Therefore, the Company may be subject increased legal proceedings, which would require management's attention and, as a result, may adversely impact management’s ability to execute the Company’s strategy effectively. Any such derivative litigation may be costly and have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Company contracts with certain third parties for portions of its operations; should a third party be subject to insolvency or otherwise be unable or unwilling to perform their obligations to the Company, it could negatively impact the Company's operations. The Company's business relies on full compliance under applicable laws and regulations relating to selling its products across the United States and internationally. The regulation of third-party suppliers may significantly impact the Company's business. Any enforcement activity or any additional uncertainties that may arise in the future could cause substantial interruption or cessation of the Company's business, including adverse impacts to the Company's supply chain and distribution channels and other civil and/or criminal penalties at the federal level.
The Company is party to business relationships, transactions and contracts with various third parties, pursuant to which such third parties have performance, payment and other obligations to the Company. If any of these third parties were to become subject to bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, the Company's rights and benefits in relation to its business relationships, contracts and transactions with such third parties could be terminated, modified in a manner adverse to the Company, or otherwise impaired. The Company cannot make any assurances that it could arrange alternate or replacement business relationships, transactions or contracts on terms as favorable as
43
existing business relationships, transactions or contracts, if at all. Any inability on the Company's part to do so could have a material adverse effect on its business and results of operations.
While discussing potential business relationships or other transactions with third parties, the Company may disclose confidential information relating to its business, operations or affairs. Although confidentiality agreements are to be signed by third parties before disclosing confidential information, a breach of such an agreement could put the Company at competitive risk and cause significant damage to its business. The harm to the Company's business from a breach of confidentiality cannot presently be quantified but may be material and may not be compensable in damages. There can be no assurance that, in the event of a breach of confidentiality, the Company will be able to obtain equitable remedies, such as injunctive relief from a court of competent jurisdiction in a timely manner, if at all, in order to prevent or mitigate any damage to its business that such a breach of confidentiality may cause.
Risks Relating to the Company’s Securities
The Company has a history of losses and may continue to incur losses in the future. The Company has incurred both operating and net losses in each of its last fiscal years, and may continue to incur losses in the future as it continues to build its brand and invest in its products. This lack of profitability limits the resources available to the Company to fund its operations and to invest in new products and services and otherwise improve its business operations. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to operate profitably or generate positive cash flows. If the Company cannot achieve profitability, it may be forced to cease operations and investors may suffer a total loss of investment.
Debt and the Convertible Debenture Agreement that the Company has in place may limit other future potential strategic investor interests. Effective as of November 14, 2022, the Company entered into the Subscription Agreement with BT DE Investments, Inc. a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAT Group (LSE: BATS and NYSE: BTI), providing for the issuance of an approximately $56.8 million (C$75.3 million) debenture convertible into 19.9% ownership of the Company’s Common Shares at a conversion price of C$2.00 per Common Share of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). The debenture will accrue interest at an annualized rate of 5% until such time that there is federal regulation permitting the use of cannabidiol, a phytocannabinoid derived from CBD as an ingredient in food products and dietary supplements in the United States. Following federal regulation of CBD, the annualized rate of interest shall reduce to 1.5%. The maturity date for the debenture is November 2029.
The material investment by BT DE Investments, Inc. and the resulting significant ownership interest in the Company may have the effect of delaying or preventing change of control transactions, including transactions that some or all of the Company's Shareholders might consider to be desirable.
The Company has required and, in the future, may require additional financing to operate its business, and it may face difficulties acquiring additional financing on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Given its lack of profitability, the Company has required, and in the future may require, additional capital to continue operations at its cultivation and production facilities, expansion of its product lines, development of its intellectual property base, increasing production capabilities and expanding its operations in states where it currently operates and states where it currently does not have operations. The Company may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to it, or at all. If the Company fails to raise additional capital, as needed, its ability to implement its business model and strategy could be compromised.
The capital needs of the Company will depend on numerous factors including: (i) profitability; (ii) the release of competitive products by competitors; (iii) the level of investment in R&D; (iv) operating expenses and (v) the amount of the Company’s capital expenditures, including acquisitions. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain capital in the future to meet its needs.
The Company is continually assessing a range of public and private financing options, including secured and unsecured debt, equity, and convertible debt. Although the Company has accessed private financing in the past, there is neither a broad nor deep pool of institutional capital that is available to companies in the U.S. hemp industry. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if raised privately, will be available to the Company when needed or on terms which are acceptable.
The Company has discretion in the use of proceeds from its securities issuances. Generally, when the Company issues securities, management of the Company will have broad discretion with respect to the application of net proceeds received by the Company from the sale of the securities and may spend such proceeds in ways that do not improve the Company’s results of operations or enhance the value of the securities issued and outstanding from time to time. Any failure by management to apply these funds effectively could result in
44
financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or cause the price of the securities of the Company issued and outstanding from time to time to decline.
There is a limited market for the Company’s Common Shares. The Common Shares are listed on the TSX under the symbol "CWEB". However, there can be no assurance that an active and liquid market for the Common Shares or warrants will be maintained and an investor may find it difficult to resell any securities of the Company.
The market price of the Company’s Common Shares and other listed securities may be volatile. The market price of the Common Shares may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. This volatility may affect the ability of holders of the Common Shares to sell their securities at an advantageous price. Such volatility could be subject to significant fluctuations in response to numerous factors including:
•the public’s reaction to the Company’s press releases, announcements and filings with regulatory authorities and those of its competitors;
•fluctuations in broader stock market prices and volumes or adverse changes in general market conditions or economic trends;
•changes in market valuations of similar companies;
•investor perception of the Company, its prospects or the industry in general;
•additions or departures of key personnel;
•commencement of or involvement in litigation;
•changes in the regulatory landscape applicable to the Company, the dietary supplement and/or the hemp industry;
•media reports, publications or public statements relating to, or public perceptions of, the regulatory landscape applicable to the Company, the dietary supplement and/or the hemp industry, whether correct or not;
•announcements by the Company or its competitors of strategic alliances, significant contracts, new technologies, acquisitions, dispositions, commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
•variations in the Company’s quarterly results of operations or cash flows or those of other comparable companies;
•revenues and operating results failing to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors in a particular quarter;
•downward revision in securities analysts’ estimates;
•changes in the Company’s pricing policies or the pricing policies of its competitors;
•future issuances and sales of Common Shares or other securities of the Company, including as a result of the conversion of Proportionate Voting Shares and sale of Common Shares issuable thereafter;
•sales of Common Shares by insiders of the Company;
•third party disclosure of significant short positions;
•demand for and trading volume of Common Shares and other listed securities of the Company;
•changes in securities analysts’ recommendations and their estimates of the Company’s financial performance;
•short-term fluctuation in share price caused by changes in general conditions in the domestic and worldwide economies or financial markets;
45
•changes in global financial markets and global economics and general market conditions, such as interest rates and product price volatility; and
•the other risk factors described in this Form 10-K.
The realization of any of these risks and other factors beyond the Company’s control could cause the market price of the Common Shares to decline significantly.
In addition, broad market and societal factors, as well as political, social and economic instability globally or in the markets the Company serves may harm the market price of the Common Shares and other listed securities of the Company. Hence, the price of the Common Shares and such other securities could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with the Company, and these fluctuations could materially reduce the price of the Common Shares or such other securities regardless of the Company’s operating performance. Additionally, these factors, as well as other related factors, may cause decreases in asset values that are deemed to be other than temporary, which may result in impairment losses. There can be no assurance that continuing fluctuations in price and volume will not occur. If such increased levels of volatility and market turmoil continue, the Company’s operations could be adversely impacted, and the trading price of the Common Shares or other listed securities of the Company may be materially adversely affected.
In the past, following a significant decline in the market price of a company’s securities, there have been instances of securities class action litigation having been instituted against that company. If the Company were involved in any similar litigation, it could incur substantial costs, management’s attention and resources could be diverted and it could harm the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.
The Company does not intend to pay dividends on its Common Shares and, consequently, the ability of investors to achieve a return on their investment will depend entirely on appreciation in the price of the Company’s Common Shares. The Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends on the Common Shares in the foreseeable future. The Company currently intends to retain all future earnings to fund the development and growth of its business. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of the directors and will depend on, among other things, the Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to the payment of dividends, and other considerations that the directors deem relevant. Investors must rely on sales of their Common Shares after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize a return on their investment.
The Company is a holding company and its earnings depend on the earnings and distributions of its subsidiaries. The Company is a holding company and substantially all of its assets consist of shares of Charlotte’s Web, Inc. and Abacus Health Products, Inc. (including its subsidiaries). As a result, investors are subject to the risks attributable to Charlotte’s Web, Inc. and any and all future affiliates. The Company does not have any significant assets and conducts substantially all of its business through its subsidiaries, which generate all or substantially all of the Company’s revenues. The ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to distribute funds to the Company will depend on their operating results, tax considerations (both domestic and cross-border) and will be subject to applicable laws and regulations which require that solvency and capital standards be maintained by these subsidiaries and contractual restrictions contained in the instruments governing their debt, existing or if incurred. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of one or more of the Company’s subsidiaries, or any other future subsidiary, holders of indebtedness and trade creditors will generally be entitled to payment of their claims from the assets of those subsidiaries before any assets are made available for distribution to the Company.
Future sales of Common Shares by Shareholders, directors or officers could create volatility in the Company’s share price. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws and the terms of any applicable lock-up arrangements, the Company’s officers, directors, promoters and their affiliates may sell some or all of their Common Shares in the future. No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, such future sales of Common Shares will have on the market price of the Common Shares prevailing from time to time. However, the future sale of a substantial number of Common Shares by the Company’s officers and directors, promoters and their affiliates, or the perception that such sales could occur, could materially adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Common Shares of the Company and other listed securities of the Company.
All of the currently outstanding Common Shares are, subject to applicable securities laws, generally immediately available for resale in the public markets. Additional Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options may also become available for sale in the public market, which may also cause the market price of the Common Shares to fall. Accordingly, if substantial amounts of Common Shares are sold in the public market, the market price could fall.
46
A small number of Shareholders may exercise significant influence on matters submitted to Shareholders for approval. The Company has a small number of Shareholders who, to the knowledge of the Company, own, in the aggregate, in excess of 5.0% equity interest in the Company. Although such Shareholders may not have an agreement to act in concert, such Shareholders may have the ability to exercise significant influence over matters submitted to Shareholders for approval, whether subject to approval by a majority of the Shareholders or special resolution. On June 16, 2023, a group of three Shareholders filed a statement on Schedule 13D with the SEC indicating that they, collectively, held over 5% interest in the Company and had taken certain steps with the objective of replacing certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors.
The Company may issue an unlimited number of shares, and additional issuances could dilute a Shareholder’s holdings. The Company may issue additional Common Shares in the future which may dilute a Shareholder’s holdings in the Company. The Articles permit the issuance of an unlimited number of Common Shares, and an unlimited number of Preferred Shares issuable in series, and Shareholders have no preemptive rights in connection with any further issuances. The directors of the Company have the discretion to determine the provisions attaching to the Common Shares and the price and the terms of issue of further Common Shares.
Additional equity financing, including pursuant to an at-the-market offering, may be dilutive to Shareholders and could contain rights and preferences superior to those of the Common Shares. Debt financing may involve restrictions on the Company’s financing and operating activities. Debt financing may be convertible into other securities of the Company which may result in immediate or resulting dilution. In either case, additional financing may not be available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to raise additional funds as needed, the scope of its operations or growth may be reduced and, as a result, the Company may be unable to fulfil its long-term goals. In this case, investors may lose all or part of their investment. Any default under such debt instruments could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its business, or the results of operations.
Purchasers of the Company’s Common Shares may experience immediate and substantial dilution of their investment. The offering price of Common Shares may significantly exceed the net tangible book value per share of the Common Shares. Accordingly, a purchaser of Common Shares may incur immediate and substantial dilution of his, her or its investment. If outstanding options and warrants to purchase Common Shares are exercised or securities convertible into Common Shares are converted, additional dilution will occur. The Company has disclosed the dilutive effect of the BAT convertible debenture within the notes of the financial statements. The Company may sell additional Common Shares or other securities that are convertible or exchangeable into Common Shares in future offerings or may issue additional Common Shares or other securities to finance future acquisitions.
The Company cannot predict the size or nature of future sales or issuances of securities or the effect, if any, that such future sales and issuances will have on the market price of the Common Shares. Sales or issuances of substantial numbers of Common Shares or other securities that are convertible or exchangeable into Common Shares, or the perception that such sales or issuances could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of the Common Shares. With any additional sale or issuance of Common Shares or other securities that are convertible or exchangeable into Common Shares, investors will suffer dilution to their voting power and economic interest in the Company. Furthermore, to the extent holders of the Company’s stock options or other convertible securities convert or exercise their securities and sell the Common Shares they receive, the trading price of the Common Shares on the TSX may decrease due to the additional amount of Common Shares available in the market.
The elimination of monetary liability against the Company’s directors, officers, and employees under British Columbia law and the existence of indemnification rights for the Company’s obligations to its directors, officers, and employees may result in substantial expenditures by the Company and may discourage lawsuits against its directors, officers, and employees. The Company’s Articles contain a provision permitting the Company to eliminate the personal liability of its directors to the Company and its Shareholders for damages incurred as a director or officer to the extent provided by British Columbia law. The Company also has contractual indemnification obligations under employment agreements with certain of its officers and agreements entered into with its directors. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in the Company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which the Company may be unable to recoup. These provisions and the resulting costs may also discourage the Company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by the Company’s Shareholders against the Company’s directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit the Company and its Shareholders.
There may be difficulty in enforcing judgments and effecting service of process on directors and officers who are not citizens of the United States. Certain of the Company’s directors and officers reside outside of the United States and some or all of the assets of such persons are located outside of the United States. Therefore, it may not be possible for Shareholders to collect or to enforce judgments or
47
liabilities against them under U.S. securities laws. Moreover, it may not be possible for Shareholders to effect service of process upon such persons. Generally, original actions to enforce liabilities under U.S. federal securities laws may not be brought in a Canadian or other court. Such actions must be brought in a court in the United States with applicable jurisdiction. Persons obtaining judgments against the Company in United States courts, including judgments obtained under U.S. federal securities laws, will then be required to bring an application in a Canadian court to enforce such judgments in Canada.
The Company’s Articles provide that the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada and the Court of Appeal of British Columbia, Canada shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for derivative actions, actions relating to breaches of fiduciary duty, and other matters, creating a conflict with U.S. federal securities laws, which may limit the ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with the Company. The Company’s Articles contain a forum selection provision, which, among other things, identifies British Columbia courts as the exclusive forum for certain litigation. Given that, under United States law, investors cannot waive compliance by the Company with U.S. federal securities laws, it is uncertain whether the forum selection provision applies to actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws, and if it does, whether British Columbia Courts would enforce such provision. It is also uncertain whether a breach of U.S. securities law in and of itself would give rise to a direct cause of action in British Columbia Courts, although indirect causes of action may arise thereunder as a result of, without limitation, breach or misrepresentation. In the event it was determined that the forum selection provision applies to actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws or, if British Columbia Courts refused to enforce such provisions, if a breach of U.S. securities law did not give rise to a cause of action in British Columbia Courts, there is a risk that the Company would be required to litigate any such breach in a jurisdiction which is less favorable to the Company which could result in additional costs and financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. These provisions may limit the Company’s Shareholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum they find favorable for disputes with the Company or its directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against the Company and its directors, officers, and other employees.
The Company is subject to U.S. and other income tax and is treated as a U.S. domestic company for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company takes the position that the Company is treated as a U.S. domestic Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes under section 7874 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and this treatment is expected to continue indefinitely. As a result, the Company is, and anticipates that it will continue to be, subject to U.S. income tax on its worldwide income.
Furthermore, the Company is subject to Canadian and Israel income tax. Consequently, the Company is, and anticipates that it will continue to be, liable for U.S., Canadian and Israel income tax, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
General Risk Factors
Investment in the Company’s Common Shares is speculative, involves risk, and there is no guarantee of a return. There is no guarantee that the Common Shares will earn any positive return in the short term or long term. A holding of Common Shares is speculative and involves a high degree of risk and should be undertaken only by holders whose financial resources are sufficient to enable them to assume such risks and who have no need for immediate liquidity in their investment. A holding of Common Shares is appropriate only for holders who have the capacity to absorb a loss of some or all of their holdings.
Product recalls and returns could adversely affect the Company’s operating results and financial condition. Manufacturers and distributors of products are sometimes subject to the recall or return of their products for a variety of reasons, including product defects, such as contamination, unintended harmful side effects or interactions with other substances, packaging safety and inadequate or inaccurate labeling disclosure. If any of the Company’s products are recalled, the Company could incur the unexpected expense relating to the recall and any legal proceedings that might arise in connection with the recall. The Company may lose revenue due to loss of sales and may not be able to compensate for or replace that revenue.
In addition, a product recall may require significant management attention. Recall of products could lead to adverse publicity, decreased demand for the Company’s products and could have significant reputational and brand damage. Although the Company has detailed procedures in place for testing its products, there can be no assurance that any quality, potency or contamination problems will be detected in time to avoid unforeseen product recalls, regulatory action or lawsuits. A recall for any product could lead to adverse publicity, decreased demand for the Company’s products and could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company. Additionally, product recalls may lead to increased scrutiny of the Company’s operations by regulatory agencies, requiring further management attention and potential legal fees and other expenses.
48
In addition, product returns are a customary part of the Company's business. Products may be returned for various reasons, including expiration dates or lack of sufficient sales volume. Any increase in product returns could negatively impact the Company's results of operations.
The Company may be subject to impairment of intangible and long-lived assets, which could adversely impact the Company’s financial results. Intangible and long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that fair value has been reduced to less than its carrying value. Determining the fair value is judgmental and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates, strategic plans, and future market conditions, among others. There can be no assurance that the Company’s estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the impairment will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. Adverse market conditions, including a decrease in the Company’s market capitalization, temporary or permanent loss of key customers and distribution channels, among other factors, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations and could result in impairment of the Company's intangible and long-lived assets.
Certain employees or directors of the Company may have interests that conflict with those of the Company. Certain of the employees and directors of the Company may also be directors, officers, consultants or stakeholders of other companies or enterprises, some of which may be in similar sectors, and conflicts of interest may arise between their duties to the Company and their duties to or interests in such other companies or enterprises. Certain of such conflicts may be required to be disclosed in accordance with, and subject to, such procedures and remedies as applicable under the BCBCA and applicable securities laws, however, such procedures and remedies may not fully protect the Company.
The future growth of the Company depends on the effectiveness and efficiency of its advertising and promotional expenditures to attract and retain customers. The Company’s future growth and profitability will depend on the effectiveness and efficiency of advertising and promotional expenditures, including its ability to: (i) create greater awareness of its products; (ii) determine the appropriate creative message and media mix for future advertising expenditures; and (iii) effectively manage advertising and promotional costs in order to maintain acceptable operating margins. There can be no assurance that advertising and promotional expenditures will result in revenues in the future or will generate awareness of the Company’s technologies, products or services. Specifically, ineffective marketing could reduce e-commerce traffic, which will reduce new consumer acquisition place overreliance on existing consumers. In addition, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to manage its advertising and promotional expenditures on a cost-effective basis.
In addition, periodic changes to search engine algorithms, which retrieve data from search indices and deliver ranked search results, produce changes in search engine results pages. Any changes to these algorithms or in how these algorithms are applied, and therefore search engine results pages, could reduce visibility of, and traffic on, the Company’s e-commerce website and negatively impact the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
The use of customer information and other personal and confidential information creates compliance risks. The Company collects, processes, maintains and uses data, including sensitive information on individuals, available to the Company through online activities and other customer interactions with its business. The Company’s current and future marketing programs may depend on its ability to collect, maintain and use this information, and its ability to do so is subject to evolving international, U.S. and Canadian laws and enforcement trends. The Company strives to comply with all applicable laws and other legal obligations relating to privacy, data protection and customer protection, including those relating to the use of data for marketing purposes. It is possible, however, that these requirements may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another, conflict with other rules, conflict with the Company’s practices or fail to be observed by its employees or business partners. If so, the Company may suffer damage to its reputation and be subject to proceedings or actions against it by governmental entities or others. Any such proceeding or action could hurt the Company’s reputation, force it to spend significant amounts to defend its practices, distract its management or otherwise have an adverse effect on its business.
Certain of the Company’s marketing practices rely upon e-mail, social media and other means of digital communication to communicate with consumers on its behalf. The Company may face risk if its use of e-mail, social media or other means of digital communication is found to violate applicable laws. The Company posts its privacy policy and practices concerning the use and disclosure of user data on its websites. Any failure by the Company to comply with its posted privacy policy or other privacy-related laws and regulations could result in proceedings which could potentially harm its business. In addition, as data privacy and marketing laws change, the Company may incur additional costs to ensure it remains in compliance. If applicable data privacy and marketing laws become more restrictive at the international, federal, provincial or state levels, the Company’s compliance costs may increase, its ability to effectively engage customers
49
via personalized marketing may decrease, its investment in its e-commerce platform may not be fully realized, its opportunities for growth may be curtailed by its compliance burden and its potential reputational harm or liability for security breaches may increase.
The Company faces risks related to its information technology systems and potential cyber-attacks and security and privacy breaches. The Company’s operations depend, in part, on how well it and its third-party service providers protect networks, equipment, information technology ("IT") systems and software against damage from a number of threats, including, but not limited to, cable cuts, natural disasters, intentional damage and destruction, fire, power loss, hacking, computer viruses, vandalism and theft. The Company’s operations also depend on the timely maintenance, upgrade and replacement of networks, equipment, IT systems and software, as well as preemptive expenses to mitigate the risks of failures. Any of these and other events could result in information system failures, delays and/or increase in capital expenses. The failure of information systems or a component of information systems could, depending on the nature of any such failure, adversely impact the Company’s reputation and results of operations.
The Company or its third-party service providers collect, process, maintain and use sensitive personal information relating to its customers and employees, including customer financial data (e.g., credit card information) and their personally identifiable information, and rely on third parties in connection with the operation of its e-commerce site and for the various social media tools and websites it uses as part of its marketing strategy. Any perceived, attempted or actual unauthorized disclosure of customer financial data (e.g., credit card information) or personally identifiable information regarding the Company’s employees, customers or website visitors could harm its reputation and credibility, reduce its e-commerce sales, impair its ability to attract website visitors, reduce its ability to attract and retain customers and could result in litigation against the Company or the imposition of significant fines or penalties.
Recently, data security breaches suffered by well-known companies and institutions have attracted a substantial amount of media attention, prompting new foreign, federal, provincial and state laws and legislative proposals addressing data privacy and security. As a result, the Company may become subject to more extensive requirements to protect the customer information that it processes in connection with the purchase of its products, resulting in increased compliance costs.
The Company’s information technology systems and online activities, including its e-commerce websites, also may be subject to denial of service, malware or other forms of cyber-attacks. While the Company has taken measures to protect against those types of attacks, those measures may not adequately protect its online activities from such attacks. If a denial-of-service attack or other cyber event were to affect the Company’s e-commerce sites or other information technology systems, its business could be disrupted, it may lose sales or valuable data, and its reputation may be adversely affected. The Company’s risk and exposure to these matters cannot be fully mitigated because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats. As a result, cyber security and the continued development and enhancement of controls, processes and practices designed to protect systems, computers, software, data and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access is a priority. As cyber threats continue to evolve, the Company may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance protective measures or to investigate and remediate any security vulnerabilities.
Demand for the Company’s products and services are influenced by general economic and consumer trends beyond the Company’s control. There can be no assurance that the Company’s business and corresponding financial performance will not be adversely affected by general economic or consumer trends. In particular, global economic conditions remain constrained, and if such conditions continue, recur or worsen, this may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the recent trends towards rising inflation may also materially adversely the Company's business and corresponding financial position and cash flows.
Furthermore, such economic conditions have produced downward pressure on share prices and on the availability of credit for financial institutions and corporations. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue, the Company might experience reductions in business activity, increased funding costs and funding pressures, as applicable, a decrease in the market price of the Common Shares, a decrease in asset values, additional write-downs and impairment charges and lower profitability.
Future crises may be precipitated by any number of causes, including natural disasters, public health crises, geopolitical instability, or sovereign defaults. These factors may impact the Company’s operations and the ability of the Company to obtain equity or debt financing in the future and, if obtained, on terms favorable to the Company. Increased levels of volatility and market turmoil can adversely impact the Company’s operations and share price.
The costs of being a public company in both Canada and the United States are high and may strain the Company’s resources. The Company incurs significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses as a result of being a public company in both Canada and the
50
United States, which may negatively impact its performance and could cause its results of operations and financial condition to suffer. Compliance with applicable securities laws in Canada and the United States and the rules of the TSX and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") (including, but not limited to, preparation and delivery of prescribed continuous disclosure forms, payment of listing fees, potential costs associated with Shareholder actions or dissenting Shareholder activity, costs associated with regulatory reviews and costs associated with changes in laws or regulations) constitutes a significant expense, including legal and accounting costs, and makes some activities more time-consuming and costly. Reporting and other obligations as a public company may place a strain on the Company’s financial and management systems, processes and controls, as well as on personnel.
The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting may not be effective, and the Company’s independent auditors may be unwilling or unable to provide us, when required, with an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Company is subject to reporting and other obligations under applicable Canadian securities laws and rules of any stock exchange on which the Common Shares are listed, including National Instrument 52-109 – Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings of the Canadian Securities Administrators, and is subject to U.S. securities reporting and regulatory requirements. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on the Company’s management, administrative, operational and accounting resources. If the Company is unable to accomplish any such necessary objectives in a timely and effective manner, the Company’s ability to comply with its financial reporting obligations and other rules applicable to reporting issuers could be impaired. Moreover, any failure to maintain effective internal controls could cause the Company to fail to satisfy its reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in its financial statements. If the Company cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its reputation and operating results could be materially adversely affected which could also cause investors to lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, which could result in a reduction in the trading price of the Common Shares.
The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error or fraud. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues within an organization are detected. The inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can also be circumvented by individual acts of certain persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. Due to the inherent limitations in a control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected in a timely manner or at all.
The Company may have to amend prior financial reporting. The Company's auditors (former and current) are subject to standard review by the Canadian Public Accountability Board, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and similar oversight bodies and regulatory authorities in Canada and the United States. Such reviews could result in the Company being required to amend prior financial reporting, which could divert Company resources to such process.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports, or publish misleading, inaccurate or unfavorable research about the Company, its business or its market, its share price and trading volume could decline. The trading market for Common Shares could be influenced by the research and reports that industry and/or securities analysts may publish about the Company, its business, the market or competitors. If any of the analysts who may cover the Company’s business change their recommendation regarding the Common Shares adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about its competitors, the Company's share price would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover the Company’s business were to cease coverage or fail to regularly publish reports on the Company, it could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the share price or trading volume to decline.
Changes in tax laws could require the Company to pay additional tax amounts, decreasing the amount of capital available to the Company. New income, sales, use or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be enacted at any time. Further, existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to the Company. These enactments and events could require the Company to pay additional tax amounts on a prospective or retroactive basis, thereby substantially increasing the amount of taxes the Company is liable to pay in the relevant tax jurisdictions. Accordingly, these events could decrease the capital that the Company has available to operate its business. Any or all of these events could harm the business and financial performance of the Company.
Recent macroeconomic trends, including inflation, a recession or slowed economic growth, may adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Rising inflation could have an adverse impact on expenses, as these costs could increase at a higher rate than revenues. The Company's costs are subject to fluctuations, particularly due to changes in the prices of raw
51
product and packaging materials and the costs of labor, transportation and energy. Inflation pressures could also result in increases in these input costs. Therefore, The Company's business results depend, in part, on its continued ability to manage these fluctuations through pricing actions, cost saving projects and sourcing decisions, while maintaining and improving margins and market share. Failure to manage these fluctuations could adversely impact the Company's results of operations or cash flows. In addition, unfavorable macroeconomic conditions, such as a recession or continued slowed economic growth, could negatively affect consumer demand for cannabis products, which consequently, may negatively affect the results of operations. Under difficult economic conditions, consumers may seek to reduce discretionary spending by forgoing purchases of cannabis products, negatively impacting the Company's net sales and margins. Softer consumer demand for cannabis products could reduce the Company's profitability and could negatively affect its overall financial performance.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Risk Management and Strategy:
The Company has processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats. The Company has designed and implemented a cybersecurity incident response plan and related processes, which are overseen by a team of internal cybersecurity professionals, including individuals with over ten years’ experience handling vulnerability and security management, system upgrades, mitigation initiatives, user education and system re/accreditation. The Company provides regular desk-top educational training and incident simulation exercises to better address potential cyber security incidences and response thereto.
Cybersecurity threats are identified by the Incident Response Team ("Response Team") pursuant to the Cybersecurity Response Policy ("Cybersecurity Policy") and escalated to the Enterprise Risk Management Executive Committee ("ERM Committee") or member thereof pursuant to criteria set forth in this policy (See “Governance—Management” below for further discussion of the ERM Committee and the members of management comprising the ERM Committee). These processes also include overseeing and identifying risks from cybersecurity threats associated with the use of third-party service providers.
The Company's Senior Director of IT ("SDIT") oversees the Company's incident response plan and related processes designed to assess and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats. The SDIT is informed about and monitors the prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents pursuant to criteria set forth in the Company’s incident response plan and related processes. The experience of the Company's Response Team includes cybersecurity incident response, in-depth security assessments and security evaluation exercises to evaluate security profile, security research, education and outreach, and security tool development.
The Company uses a third-party consultant for monitoring, management and identification of cyber security risks. The Response Team also conducts regular internal testing of the Company’s cyber security systems.
Governance:
Board of Directors
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Audit Committee oversees, among other things, a system of internal controls, including internal controls designed to assess, identify, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats. The Audit Committee is also responsible for the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls, including those internal controls that are designed to assess, identify, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats.
52
Management
Item 2. Properties
The following table sets forth the Company’s principal physical properties used in its single operating and reportable segment.
Material Properties | ||||||||
| Type | Location | Leased / Owned | ||||||
Manufacturing, Production, Research and Development | 700 Tech Court, Louisville, Colorado | Leased | ||||||
| Office | 1801 California Street, Denver, Colorado* | Sublease | ||||||
| Office | 1600 Pearl Street, Boulder, Colorado* | Sublease | ||||||
*As of June 1, 2021, the Company executed a sublease agreement to cover its obligations concerning the 1600 Pearl Street property. Additionally, as of September 1, 2024, the Company executed a sublease agreement to cover a portion of its obligations concerning 1801 California Street property.
Facilities Overview
The Company operates several Colorado-based facilities to house administrative work, processing, R&D, distribution, horticulture, breeding and greenhouse space. In 2019, the Company leased a 136,610-square-foot industrial building located at 700 Tech Court in the Colorado Technology Center in Louisville, Colorado. This cGMP facility, the LOFT, enables the Company for production, distribution, quality control and R&D expansion. This facility was used for supply chain activities commencing in the second quarter of 2020 and manufacturing and operations commencing in the third quarter of 2020.
Through its subsidiaries, the Company has entered into material lease agreements related to its operations. Those agreements are discussed below.
53
700 Tech Court
On May 7, 2019, EJ 700 Tech Court LLC entered into a lease agreement with Charlotte’s Web, Inc. for a period of 126 months commencing on September 1, 2019 for the premises located at the LOFT at 700 Tech Court, Louisville, Colorado (the "Tech Court Lease Agreement"), a cGMP facility. Following a lease abatement period for the first six months of no monthly rent payments, the monthly base rent for the remainder of the term of the lease is an average of $143,732 per month. The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Tech Court Lease Agreement
1801 California Street
On May 11, 2021, Molson Coors Beverage Company ("Molson Coors"), as tenant and sublandlord, and Charlotte’s Web, Inc., as subtenant, entered in a sublease agreement covering and describing the premises known as the entire 47th floor of a building located at 1801 California Street in Denver, Colorado comprising 22,389 rentable square feet (the "1801 California Sublease"), leased by Molson Coors from BOP 1801 California Street II LLC and BPREP 1801 California Street JV, LLC (collectively, as the landlord), in that certain Lease of Office Space agreement dated November 26, 2014, as amended from time-to-time. Pursuant to the terms of the 1801 California Sublease, the term of the sublease was to begin on July 1, 2021 and end on March 31, 2027. The 1801 California Sublease contained a lease abatement provision for the first seven months with no rent due, and a monthly base rent for the remainder of the first 12 months of the lease term of $37,315.00. The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 1801 California Sublease.
On June 15, 2021, Molson Coors and the Company entered into that certain First Amendment to Sublease Agreement (the "First Amendment to the 1801 California Sublease"), whereby the Company agreed to sublease the 48th floor of 1801 California Street given that the 47th floor as contemplated in the 1801 California Sublease was unavailable to the Company. The First Amendment to the 1801 California Sublease contained same rent abatement term for the first seven months of the lease term, and thereafter includes a monthly installment for the term of the lease of approximately $39,269. The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the First Amendment to the1801 California Sublease.
On May 24, 2024, Charlotte’s Web, Inc. and Bachus & Schanker, LLC (“B&S”). entered into a sublease agreement whereby Charlotte’s Web, Inc. agreed to sublease to B&S, as subtenant, the entirety of the rentable square feet under the 1801 California Sublease. The B&S Sublease Agreement average monthly installment for the term of the lease is $31,289. The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the B&S Sublease Agreement.
1600 Pearl Street
On May 12, 2021, Charlotte’s Web, Inc. and Outside Interactive, Inc. ("Outside Interactive") entered into a sublease agreement whereby Charlotte’s Web, Inc. agreed to sublease to Outside Interactive, as subtenant, the entirety of the 42,191 of rentable square feet (consisting of Suite 300, Suite 100, and the Basement/Garden Level) under the 1600 Pearl Street Sublease Agreement commencing on June 1, 2021 and expiring on August 31, 2025 (the "Outside Interactive Sublease Agreement"). The Outside Interactive Sublease Agreement included a rent abatement period during the first seven months of the lease providing for $0 monthly rent. The average monthly installment for the term of the lease after the rent abatement period is $90,695. Upon receiving the landlord’s consent to the sublease, Outside Interactive delivered to Charlotte’s Web, Inc. an unconditional, irrevocable, and transferrable letter of credit in the amount of $500,000 to secure Outside Interactive’s full performance of its obligations under the Outside Interactive Sublease Agreement, naming Charlotte’s Web, Inc. as beneficiary. The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Outside Interactive Sublease Agreement.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company may be involved in various regulatory issues, claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
At present, the Company is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business. Nor is the Company or its property the subject of any legal proceedings, known or contemplated, that involve a claim for damages exclusive of interest and costs that meet or exceed 10% of its current assets.
54
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
55
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
The Common Shares of the Company are traded on the TSX under the symbol "CWEB". The following table sets forth trading information for the Common Shares for the periods indicated, as quoted on the TSX.
| Period | Low Trading Price (C$) | High Trading Price (C$) | ||||||||||||
Year Ending December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||||
First Quarter (through March 17, 2025) | C$ | 0.13 | C$ | 0.19 | ||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter (December 31, 2024) | C$ | 0.12 | C$ | 0.22 | ||||||||||
Third Quarter (September 30, 2024) | C$ | 0.19 | C$ | 0.27 | ||||||||||
Second Quarter (June 30, 2024) | C$ | 0.18 | C$ | 0.37 | ||||||||||
First Quarter (March 31, 2024) | C$ | 0.18 | C$ | 0.30 | ||||||||||
The Common Shares of the Company are also traded on the OTCQX Market under the symbol "CWBHF". But there is otherwise no established public trading market for the Common Shares in the U.S. The following table sets forth trading information for the Common Shares for the periods indicated, as quoted on the OTCQX. The OTCQX market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
| Period | Low Trading Price (U$) | High Trading Price (U$) | ||||||||||||
Year Ending December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||||
First Quarter (through March 17, 2025) | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter (December 31, 2024) | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||||
Third Quarter (September 30, 2024) | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||||
Second Quarter (June 30, 2024) | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||||
First Quarter (March 31, 2024) | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||||
Holders
As of March 17, 2025, there were 270 holders of record of the Company’s Common Shares. The actual number of holders of the Company's Common Shares is greater than the number of record holders, and includes holders who are beneficial owners, but whose securities are held in "nominee" or "street name" by brokers and other nominees.
Dividends
Other than the requirements of the BCBCA, there are no restrictions in the Company’s Articles on its ability to pay dividends. However, (i) the Company has never paid a dividend nor made a distribution on any of its securities, (ii) the Company has no history of income or sources of funds from which to pay dividends, and (iii) the Company does not anticipate paying dividends in the near future.
The payment of future dividends, if any, by the Company will be at the sole discretion of the Board. In this regard, the Company expects it will retain any earnings to finance further growth of the Company.
56
Performance Graph
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
The Company did not sell securities during the year ended December 31, 2024, which were not registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("U.S. Securities Act") or were not previously reported on a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Use of Proceeds from Registered Offerings
None.
Repurchases
None.
Item 6. [Reserved]
* * * * * * *
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Except for historical information, this section's discussion contains forward-looking statements involving risks and uncertainties. Future results could differ materially from those discussed below for many reasons, including the risks described in Item 1A—"Risk Factors."
MD&A of Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc.
For purposes of this discussion, "Charlotte's Web," "CW," "we," "our," "us," or the "Company" refers to Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries: Charlotte’s Web, Inc. and Abacus Products, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries; Abacus Health Products, Inc., Abacus Wellness, Inc. and CBD Pharmaceuticals Ltd. This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ("MD&A") is provided as of March 19, 2025 and should be read together with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. The results herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP").
Amounts are presented in thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. is a Certified B Corp headquartered in Louisville, Colorado, which conducts the majority of its business in the United States. The Company is a market leader in innovative hemp extract wellness products under a family of brands which includes Charlotte’s Web™, CBD Medic™, and CBD Clinic™. Charlotte's Web premium quality products start with proprietary hemp genetics that are 100% North American farm-grown and are then manufactured into hemp extracts containing naturally occurring phytocannabinoids including cannabidiol ("CBD"), cannabichromene ("CBC"), cannabigerol ("CBG"), terpenes, flavonoids and other cannabinoids and beneficial hemp compounds. The Company is headquartered in a cGMP compliant facility in Louisville, Colorado, where the Company conducts its production of tinctures, distribution, and quality control activities as well as research and development ("R&D"). Charlotte's Web product categories include full-spectrum hemp extract oil tinctures (liquid products), gummies, capsules, CBD topical creams and lotions, broad-spectrum botanical CBD, functional mushrooms, and pet products. The Company also offers NSF Certified for Sport® broad-spectrum tincture and gummy products. Charlotte's Web products are distributed to retailers and health care practitioners, and online through the Company's website at www.CharlottesWeb.com. The information provided on the website is not part of this MD&A.
57
The Company's business consists of the farming, manufacturing, marketing, and sales of hemp-derived CBD and botanical-based wellness products. As of December 31, 2024, the Company operated in a single operating and reportable segment, hemp-derived CBD wellness products, making up the majority of the revenue of the Company. The executive officers reviewed overall operating results in order to assess financial performance and to make resource allocation decisions, rather than assessing any lower-level unit of operations in isolation.
The Company's primary products are made from proprietary strains of whole-plant hemp extracts containing a full spectrum of phytocannabinoids, terpenes, flavonoids, and other hemp compounds. The Company believes the presence of these various compounds work synergistically to heighten the effects of the products, making them superior to single-compound isolates.
Hemp extracts are produced from cannabis and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis. The Company is engaged in research involving a broad variety of compounds derived from hemp. Where research provides evidence that a greater than 0.3% THC level may have a potential therapeutic use, the Company may consider pursuing development of that use in jurisdictions where it is legal to do so in accordance with applicable regulations and if consistent with the Company's strategic vision. The Company does not currently have any plans to expand into high THC products in the near future.
The Company grows its proprietary hemp domestically in the United States on farms leased in northeastern Colorado and sources hemp through contract farming operations in Arizona, Colorado, Kentucky, and Canada. The hemp grown in Canada is utilized exclusively in the Canadian markets or for research purposes and not in the Company's products sold within the United States.
Recent Developments
With an increased commitment to innovation, Charlotte's Web has refreshed its mission to "Unearth the Science of Nature to Revolutionize Wellness," and is evolving its wellness offerings both to strengthen the Company's core leadership in CBD, and extend beyond CBD to include a broader range of botanical-based wellness solutions, including minor cannabinoids. A testament to this expansion is the launch of Charlotte's Web Stay Asleep Cannabidiol ("CBN") gummies. Similar to CBD, CBN is a non-intoxicating cannabinoid found in the hemp plant. At the cutting edge of innovative natural sleep solutions, these new melatonin free gummies could offer distinct benefits for the approximately 67% of adults who report waking up during the night (Phillips Global Sleep Survey, 2019). This is the first CBN sleep product supported by placebo-controlled peer-reviewed research study, offering a 20 mg dose of CBN. The Stay Asleep gummy demonstrates Charlotte's Web's commitment to science-backed products, providing an effective alternative to more traditional sleep supplements and medications. Charlotte's Web believes expanding beyond CBD leverages the Company's brand recognition, intellectual property, and partnerships, including an ongoing collaboration with DeFloria, Inc. ("DeFloria") for botanical drug development.
In September 2024, the Company launched its new functional mushroom line which included three products: Focus Support, Stress Support, and Energy Support. The products are hemp-free and expand the Company's ongoing commitment to providing science-supported botanical-based solutions to its customers.
The Company's ReCreate brand has been absorbed under the recognized Charlotte’s Web brand to better penetrate the lifestyles category.
As of December 31, 2024, several states have adopted new regulations that will impact the Company's ability to sell certain products as currently formulated or packaged in these states. Many of these states have also implemented new THC/CBD limits, age verification, testing, labeling and packaging requirements. The Company continues to assess the business and financial impacts of the new regulations, including steps that can be taken to address the new product formulation and labeling requirements, as well as costs and potential revenue impacts and anticipated timing for such impacts to the Company in these states.
The Company continues to invest in R&D efforts to identify new product opportunities. The Company is working to capitalize on the rapidly emerging botanical-based wellness products industry by driving customer acquisition and retention, as well as accelerating retail expansion. In addition, the Company is expanding its product line beyond hemp-based products should the science and the Company’s strategic vision support such expansion.
On February 24, 2025, the Company announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") has completed its review of the Phase 1 data and Investigational New Drug ("IND") application submitted by DeFloria. The FDA has concluded that DeFloria may now proceed with its planned FDA Phase 2 clinical trial for its botanical pharmaceutical candidate, AJA001 Oral Solution, a treatment for
58
symptoms of autism spectrum disorder ("ASD"). DeFloria is a collaboration including the Company and AJNA to develop AJA001 as a treatment for irritability associated with autism spectrum disorder. AJA001 employs the Company's proprietary full-spectrum cannabidiol hemp extract derived from one of its patented cultivars.
Selected Financial Information
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 49,667 | $ | 63,155 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 28,407 | 27,589 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 21,260 | $ | 35,566 | ||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 53,247 | 75,630 | ||||||||||||
Asset impairments | — | 548 | ||||||||||||
| Operating loss | $ | (31,987) | $ | (40,612) | ||||||||||
| Gain on initial investment in unconsolidated entity | — | 10,700 | ||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of financial instruments | 615 | 9,339 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 1,565 | (2,694) | ||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | (39) | (529) | ||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (29,846) | $ | (23,796) | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 113,442 | $ | 152,548 | ||||||||||
| Long-term liabilities | $ | 70,419 | $ | 73,344 | ||||||||||
Revenue
The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from sales of branded products to consumers via the Company’s DTC e-commerce website, distributors, and retail B2B customers.
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | % Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product revenue | $ | 49,019 | $ | 63,155 | (22.4) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Service revenue | 648 | — | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 49,667 | $ | 63,155 | (21.4) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $49,667, a decrease of 21.4% compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Total product revenue decreased 22.4% compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by lower comparable average order value sales through the Company’s web store, reflecting a price reduction of the Company’s oil tincture products introduced at the beginning of 2024. However, comparable year-over-year unit volume sales began improving in the second half of 2024. Revenue was also negatively impacted by inflationary impacts on consumer spending, reduced retailer shelf allocations to the CBD category, and the fallout of some retailers exiting the CBD category as a result of increased state regulatory pressures.
The service revenue is attributable to the Company and DeFloria, Inc. ("DeFloria") entering into a Master Services Agreement ("Services Agreement") pursuant to which the Company is compensated for the provision of certain services to DeFloria.
59
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold includes the cost of inventory sold, changes in inventory provisions, and other production costs expensed. Other production costs include direct and indirect production costs, including direct labor, processing, testing, packaging, quality assurance, security, shipping, depreciation of production equipment, indirect labor, including production management, and other related expenses. The primary factors that can impact cost of goods sold on a period-to-period basis include the volume of products sold, mix of products sold, third-party quality costs, transportation, overhead allocations, and changes in inventory provisions.
The components of cost of goods sold are as follows:
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | % Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory expensed to cost of goods sold | 16,030 | 19,757 | (18.9) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory provision, net | 4,154 | 1,039 | 299.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other production costs | 4,188 | 3,222 | 30.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Service costs | 647 | — | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 3,388 | 3,571 | (5.1) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of goods sold | $ | 28,407 | $ | 27,589 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold increased 3.0% for the year ended December 31, 2024 despite lower revenue compared to the same period in 2023. The increase was primarily due to a $4.2 million increase in inventory provisions in 2024 due to the revaluation of aged hemp biomass based on current market conditions. The increase was partially offset by lower inventory expense and other variable costs associated with lower revenue in 2024.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $9,979 and $15,160, respectively, of which $3,388 and $3,571, respectively, was expensed to cost of goods sold. The remaining depreciation and amortization expenses of $6,591 and $11,589, respectively, was expensed to Selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Gross Profit
The primary factors that can impact gross profit margins include the volume of products sold, revenue mix between DTC e-commerce and B2B, product sales mix, promotional and sales discount rate, manufacturing spend, transportation costs, and changes in inventory provisions.
Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 is as follows:
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | % Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 21,260 | $ | 35,566 | (40.2) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross margin | 42.8 | % | 56.3 | % | (24.0) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $21,260, compared to $35,566 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease primarily related to the revenue decrease of 21.4%, impacting fixed cost absorption, and lowering blended margin following price reductions on oil tincture products initiated in the first quarter of 2024. Additionally, gross profit was reduced by the $4.2 million inventory provision as described within Cost of Goods Sold.
60
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Total Selling, general, and administrative expenses are as follows:
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | % Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general, and administrative expenses | $ | 53,247 | $ | 75,630 | (29.6) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $53,247 and $75,630, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the 29.6% decrease was primarily due to the cost cutting measures undertaken by the company in the second half of the year, These measures included adjusting the size of the workforce to properly align with the revenue scope, improving the Company's insurance program, aligning with more cost-efficient software options, and making prudent travel decisions, among others.
Depreciation and amortization expensed to Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $6,591 and $11,589, respectively, and decreased due to the amendment to the MLB agreement that allowed for the extension of the payments and amortization.
Total research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $2,332 and $2,964, respectively, expensed to Selling, general, and administrative expense. Research and development expenses primarily include personnel costs related to the Company's R&D science division as well as R&D related projects advancing hemp cannabinoid science through research programs that provide a better understanding of the therapeutic uses of cannabinoids.
Gain on Initial Investment in Unconsolidated Entity
The initial gain on investment in unconsolidated entity is as follows:
| Year Ended | % (Decrease)/ Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on initial investment in unconsolidated entity | $ | — | $ | 10,700 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total change in gain on investment in unconsolidated entity the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $0 and $10,700 respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the gain was due to the Company jointly forming an entity, DeFloria, with AJNA, and BAT. DeFloria was established to pursue FDA approval for a novel botanical drug to target a neurological condition, with the botanical drug being developed from certain proprietary hemp genetics of the Company. The initial investment was measured at fair value and is remeasured at each reporting date, with changes recognized in changes in fair value of financial instruments.
Total Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The total change in fair value of financial instruments is as follows:
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | % Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of financial instruments | $ | 615 | $ | 9,339 | 93.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total change in fair value of financial instruments for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 was a gain of $615 and $9,339, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the gain in fair value of financial instruments was primarily due to the
61
revaluation of the fair value of the Company's debt conversion option and debt interest rate conversion feature resulting in a gain of $2.5 million, compared to a net gain of $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The fair value of the Company's embedded derivatives and options are revalued at each reporting date, with changes impacted by variability in the Company's share price and implied debt yields.
Asset Impairments
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | % Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Impairment | $ | — | $ | 548 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded an impairment loss due to the decline in market conditions at the Company's hemp farm that indicated a fair value less than the carrying value.
Provision for Income Taxes
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | % Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | $ | (39) | $ | (529) | (92.6) | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | (0.1) | % | (2.3) | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Company’s effective tax rate during the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 was (0.1)% and (2.3)%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2024 is (0.1)% as the Company continues to believe its deferred tax assets are more likely to not be realized and a full valuation allowance remains recorded against net deferred taxes as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. The increase in the effective rate for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, is primarily due to the remeasurement of the valuation allowance.
62
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s objective when managing its liquidity and capital resources is to provide sufficient short and long-term liquidity to fund net operating losses and capital expenditures while executing strategic growth plans. In the near to mid-term, it is focused on reducing negative cash flows from operations.
On November 14, 2022, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with BT DE Investments, Inc. a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAT Group (LSE: BATS and NYSE: BTI), providing for the issuance of an approximately $56.8 million convertible debenture (the "debenture"). The debenture is convertible into 19.9% ownership of the Company’s Common Shares at a conversion price of C$2.00 per Common Share of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX"). The debenture will accrue interest at a stated annualized rate of 5% until such time that there is federal regulation permitting the use of CBD as an ingredient in food products and dietary supplements in the United States. Following federal regulation of CBD, the stated annualized rate of interest shall be reduced to 1.5%. Interest is accrued annually and payable on the maturity date or date of earlier conversion. The maturity date for the debenture is November 2029. The funds from this debenture can be used for operating purposes to fund the Company, as approved by the board of directors or in accordance with the Company’s board-approved budget.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had total cash and cash equivalents of $22,618, compared to $47,820 at December 31, 2023. The decrease over the twelve-month period is primarily a result of cash used in operating activities of $21,261, and capital expenditures of $3,851 primarily allocated to enabling in-house production of topical and gummy products.
As a result of delays in federal regulation of the hemp CBD industry and lower-than-expected revenue, management began taking actions in 2022 to reduce annual operating costs by lowering employee costs, simplifying the business through rationalizing the number of products produced and sold, reducing the number of third-party co-manufacturers, and lowering spend on non-employee-related SG&A costs. Other than an increase in MLB spend, management has continued these cost saving measures throughout 2024.
The Company filed a final short form base shelf prospectus on May 5, 2021, with Canadian regulators, with a term of 25 months, which allowed the Company to qualify the distribution by way of prospectus in Canada of up to C$350,000 of common shares, preferred shares, warrants, subscription receipts, units, or any combination thereof. The final short-form base prospectus was set to expire on June 6, 2023. The Company filed a prospectus supplement to distribute up to C$60,000 of common shares of the Company (the "Offered Shares") under the ATM Program. As of January 4, 2022, the ATM Program ceased to be available to the Company. Thereafter, the manner in which the Company raises capital will likely require that the Company file registration statements with the SEC related to such activities, which will likely increase the time and expense associated with such activities.
Management believes that the Company's existing cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments will provide sufficient liquidity to fund operations and planned capital expenditures for the next 12 months. The Company’s ability to fund its operations for the longer term will depend on the future operating performance, particularly revenue growth, which can be affected by general economic conditions, industry regulatory changes, and other factors beyond the Company’s control.
In addition to cash provided by operations, the Company may fund long-term liquidity requirements through various sources of capital. The Company regularly considers fundraising opportunities and may decide, from time to time, to raise capital through borrowings or issuances of additional equity and/or debt securities. The Company’s ability to raise funds through the issuance of additional equity and/or debt securities is dependent on a number of factors, including the current state of the capital markets, investor sentiment, and intended use of proceeds.
Cash Flows
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (21,261) | $ | (15,386) | ||||||||||
63
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the increase in cash used in operations of $5.9 million is primarily due to the Company's collection of $4.3 million from income tax refunds during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (3,796) | $ | (3,506) | ||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the increase in cash used in investing activities was driven primarily by machinery purchases as part of the Company's plan to in-source topical and gummy production.
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (145) | $ | (251) | ||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the change was primarily due to the vesting of restricted stock units.
Outstanding Share Data
The Company’s authorized share capital consists of (i) an unlimited number of common shares; (ii) an unlimited number of proportionate voting shares (each proportionate voting share is equal to 400 common shares in terms of voting and economic rights); and (iii) an unlimited number of preferred shares, issuable in series. On November 3, 2021, all outstanding proportionate voting shares of the Company were converted by way of mandatory conversion in accordance with the Company’s Articles, and at the discretion of the Company, into common shares. Following this conversion, and as of the close of business on November 3, 2021, 142,335,464 common shares were issued and outstanding, nil proportionate voting shares were issued and outstanding, and nil preferred shares were issued and outstanding. Pursuant to the Company’s Articles, the Company is no longer authorized to issue additional proportionate voting shares.
As of March 17, 2025, 158,009,541 common shares were issued and outstanding, and nil preferred shares were issued and outstanding. As of March 17, 2025, potential dilutive securities include (i) stock options exercisable to purchase 985,012 common shares pursuant to the Company’s 2015 legacy option plan with a weighted average exercise price of $0.56; (ii) stock options exercisable to purchase 2,366,675 common shares pursuant to the Company’s 2018 option plan, as amended, with a weighted average exercise price of $0.72; (iii) 4,409,234 restricted share units ("RSUs"). Each option, restricted share award, and convertible share entitles the holder to purchase one common share.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2024, the Company does not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on the results of operations or financial condition, including, and without limitation, such considerations as liquidity and capital resources.
64
Related party transactions
Effective November 2020, the Company issued a secured promissory note, where $1,000 was loaned to one of the Stanley Brothers. The note receivable was secured by equity instruments with certain of the Stanley Brothers, bore interest at 3.25% per annum, and required the unpaid principal and unpaid interest balances to be paid on or before the maturity date of November 13, 2021, which was subsequently extended. Effective November 13, 2024, the Company entered into a third amendment of the promissory note to extend the maturity date until November 13, 2029. According to the terms of the agreement, no additional interest will accrue through the payment date. The note has been fully reserved for as of December 31, 2024.
On March 2, 2021, the Company entered into the SBH Purchase Option with Stanley Brothers USA as discussed above (Note 3 "Fair Value Measurement"). The SBH Purchase Option was purchased for total consideration of $8,000. Certain of the Stanley Brothers, who are or were employees of the Company at the time, are the majority Shareholders of Stanley Brothers USA.
Effective January 5, 2023, the Company entered into a Brand License and Option Agreement with JMS Brands LLC, an entity owned by one of the Stanley Brothers. Pursuant to the Brand License and Option Agreement, the Company licensed certain intellectual property from JMS Brands LLC, for an annual license fee of $500. As of January 5, 2024, the Brand License and Option Agreement has expired.
On April 6, 2023, the Company jointly formed an entity, DeFloria, with AJNA and BAT. AJNA is a botanical drug development company. AJNA is partially owned and was co-founded by certain of the Stanley Brothers. BAT holds an equity interest in the entity in the form of 2,000,000, preferred units following its $10 million investment and has the right to participate in future equity issuances to maintain its pro rata equity position. The Company and AJNA each hold 4,000,000 of the entity’s voting common units (Note 3). Effective May 1, 2023, the Company entered into an 8% interest bearing note receivable with DeFloria for the sale of lab equipment in the amount of $170. The principal and interest of the note receivable will be paid in 36 monthly installments. As of December 31, 2024, the remaining note receivable of $71 is presented in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, on February 12, 2024, the Company and DeFloria entered into a separate master services agreement pursuant to which the Company will be compensated for the provision of certain services to DeFloria. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized $648 in revenue and cost of goods sold, respectively, related to the service agreement with DeFloria. The Company has an accounts receivable balance due from DeFloria of $648 as of December 31, 2024.
On June 21, 2024, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Jared Stanley, former executive of the Company, and current member of the Board of Directors. In consideration for Mr. Stanley's services, he will receive a bi-weekly fee of $6.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2023 the FASB issued ASU 2023-07—Segment Reporting. The guidance was issued to provide financial statement users with more disaggregated expense information about a public entity’s reportable segments. The guidance is effective for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the expanded interim disclosures are effective in entities in 2025 and will be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Listed below are the accounting policies and estimates believed to be critical to the Company's financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue, or expense being reported. Please also refer to note "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates" of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion on recently adopted and issued accounting pronouncements.
Fair Value Option
The Company has elected the fair value option in accordance with ASC 825-10 guidance to record its SBH Purchase Option. Under ASC 825-10, a business entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The SBH Purchase Option is classified as a financial asset in the consolidated balance sheets and is remeasured at fair value at each reporting date, with changes to fair value recognized in the statements of operations for the period. The use of assumptions for the fair value determination includes a high degree of subjectivity and judgment using unobservable inputs (level 3 on the fair value hierarchy), which results in estimation uncertainty. Changes in assumptions that reasonably could have been different at the
65
reporting date may result in a higher or lower determination of fair value. The Monte Carlo valuation model considers multiple revenue and EBITDA outcomes for Stanley Brothers USA and other probabilities in assigning a fair value. Primary assumptions utilized include financial projections of Stanley Brothers USA and the probability and timing of exercise asserted by the Company.
Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
The Company has a variable interest in the investment in DeFloria; however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of DeFloria as it lacks the power to direct DeFloria's key activities. The Company concluded that the investment in DeFloria should not be consolidated. In accordance with ASC 825-10, equity method investments are eligible for the fair value option as they represent recognized financial assets. As the Company was not required to consolidate the investment and does not meet any of the other scope exceptions, the Company had the ability to adopt the fair value option for the investment at inception. The investment was remeasured at fair value after each reporting date, with changes recognized in consolidated statements of operations, as changes in fair value of financial instruments for the period.
The use of assumptions for the fair value determination of the investment in Defloria included a high degree of subjectivity and judgment using unobservable inputs (level 3 on the fair value hierarchy), which results in estimation uncertainty. To determine the value of the investment, the Company utilizes an Option Pricing Model (OPM). The OPM considers the various terms of the stockholder agreements, including the level of seniority among the securities, dividend policy, conversion ratios, and cash allocations upon liquidation of the entity. The OPM is appropriate when the range of potential future outcomes is difficult to predict with any certainty.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less any applicable selling expenses. Cost includes all expenses for direct raw materials inputs, as well as costs directly attributable to the manufacturing process, as well as suitable portions of related production overheads, based on normal operating capacity. Cost is determined by use of the weighted average method. To determine if a provision for inventories is required, the Company periodically reviews the value of items in inventory and provides write-downs or write-offs of inventory based on its assessment of market conditions, including forecasted demand compared to quantities on hand, as well as other factors such as potential excess or aged inventories based on product shelf life, and other factors that affect inventory obsolescence. The Company’s inventories of harvested hemp are recorded at cost to grow and harvest. Raw materials costs, as well as production costs, are included in the carrying value of the Company’s finished goods inventory. The Company's inventory production process for cannabinoid products includes cultivating botanical raw material. Because of the duration of the cultivation process, a portion of the inventory will not be sold within one year. Consistent with the practice in other industries that cultivate botanical raw materials, all inventory is classified as a current asset.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for impairment at least annually and reviews all intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to depreciation and amortization, as well as indefinite-lived intangibles and goodwill, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable or that the useful life is shorter than the Company had originally estimated. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of each asset or asset group to the future undiscounted cash flows the asset or asset group is expected to generate over their remaining lives. If the asset or asset group is considered to be impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset or asset group. If the useful life is shorter than originally estimated, the Company amortizes the remaining carrying value over the new shorter useful life. Impairment losses are recorded in selling, general, and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. There was $0 and $548 of impairment losses recognized related to long-lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.
Convertible Debenture
The Company determined that the debenture is a freestanding financial instrument which includes embedded derivatives. The embedded derivatives have been bifurcated from the debenture and accounted for separately in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Company reviewed the terms of the debenture and identified two material embedded features which required bifurcation and separate accounting pursuant to the provisions of ASC 815: 1) the interest rate conversion feature based on changes in federal regulations, and 2) the debt conversion option to common shares. The debt interest rate conversion feature is classified
66
as a derivative asset and measured at fair value using a probability-weighted income approach. The debt conversion option is classified as a derivative liability and measured at fair value using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company allocated proceeds first to the derivatives measured at fair value and the residual amount was allocated to the debenture. Debt issuance costs are allocated to the debenture. The debt issuance costs are presented as a direct reduction from the face value of the debenture and amortized over the stated term of the debenture.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the temporary difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal income tax rate in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is based on the changes in the deferred income tax assets or liabilities from period to period. A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. The Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered as deductions from future taxable income. The evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance is performed on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis and includes a review of all available positive and negative evidence. Factors reviewed include projections of pre-tax book income for the foreseeable future, determination of cumulative pre-tax book income or loss, earnings history, forecasting reliability. It is the Company's policy to offset indefinite lived deferred tax assets with indefinite lived deferred tax liabilities. The Company provided a full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets because it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company accounts for uncertainties in income taxes under ASC Topic 740, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement methodology to recognize and measure an income tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. With respect to any tax positions that do not meet the recognition threshold, a corresponding liability, including interest and penalties, is recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The Company may be subject to examination by tax authorities where the Company conducts operations. The earliest income tax year that may be subject to examination is 2019. The Company has recorded an uncertain tax position as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties on taxes, if any, within the statement of operations as income tax expense.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer ("ASC 606"). The Company elected to early adopt ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018, as permitted by the standard. The Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The Company applies the five-step model to arrangements that meet the definition of a contract under the standard, including when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of revenue accounting, the Company evaluates the goods or services promised within each contract-related performance obligation and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.
The Company recognizes revenue from customers when control of the goods or services is transferred to the customer, generally when products are shipped, at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. Freight revenue is included in revenue on the consolidated statements of operations and is generally exempt from state sales taxes. Sales tax collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis and therefore are excluded from revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. Contracts are written to include standard discounts and allowances. Contracts are not written to include advertising allowances, tiered discounts, or any other performance obligation. Since the Company’s contracts involve the delivery of various tangible products, the arrangements are considered to contain only a single performance obligation; as such, there is no allocation of the transaction price. The Company also offers e-commerce discounts and promotions through its online rewards program. The Charlotte’s Web Loyalty Program offers customers rewards points for every dollar spent through the Company website to earn store credit for future purchases. The Company defers recognition of revenue for unredeemed awards until the
67
following occurs: (1) rewards are redeemed by the consumer, (2) points or certificates expire, or (3) an estimate of the expected unused portion of points or certificates is applied, which is based on historical redemption patterns.
Any product that does not meet the customer’s expectations can be returned within the first 30 days of delivery in exchange for another product or for a full refund. Generally, any product sold through a distributor or retailer must be returned to the original purchase location for any return or exchange. The Company accounts for customer returns utilizing the "expected value method". Expected amounts are excluded from revenue and recorded as a "refund liability" that represents the Company’s obligation to return the customer’s consideration. Estimates are based on actual historical and current specific data.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Fair Value
The Company’s financial assets include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, notes receivable, investments in unconsolidated entities, an SBH purchase option, and other derivative assets. Financial liabilities include accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities, cultivation liabilities, notes payable, lease obligations, convertible debenture, and derivative liability. The carrying amounts of current assets and liabilities approximate their fair value due to their short period to maturity. The derivative financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value through profit or loss ("FVTPL"). The fair value measurement of the Company’s financial and non-financial assets and liabilities utilizes market observable inputs and data as far as possible. Inputs used in determining fair value measurements are categorized into different levels based on how observable the inputs used in the valuation technique utilized are (the 'fair value hierarchy'):
- Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical items (unadjusted);
- Level 2: Observable direct or indirect inputs other than Level 1 inputs; and
- Level 3: Unobservable inputs (i.e., not derived from market data).
The classification of an item into the above levels is based on the lowest level of the inputs used that has a significant effect on the fair value measurement of the item. Transfers of items between levels are recognized in the period they occur. The Company's cash and cash equivalents are subject to a level 1 valuation. The Company’s derivative liabilities are subject to a level 2 valuation. The Company’s SBH purchase option, other derivative assets, and investment in unconsolidated entity are subject to a level 3 valuation. The basis of the valuation of the derivative financial assets and liabilities, as well as the investment in an unconsolidated entity, are fair value. Refer to the "Fair Value Measurements" note in the consolidated financial statements for additional analysis of fair value instruments.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates and interest rates, will affect the Company’s income or the value of it holding financial instruments. The Company conducts sales transactions with foreign entities. The transactions are primarily denominated in USD, the functional currency. On November 11, 2022, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with BAT Group for $56.8 million convertible debenture. The debenture was denominated in Canadian Dollars ("CAD" or "C$") C$75.3 million per the subscription agreement and translated to USD on the transaction date. The Company remeasures the debenture and the derivatives associated with the debenture at each balance sheet date using the CAD to USD exchange rate as of that balance sheet date. The Company recognizes the resulting foreign currency gain or loss within the statement of operation during the period. See additional discussion of foreign currency translation related to the convertible debenture within note Note 8 - "Debt" in the consolidated financial statements.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market interest rates. The Company’s accounts receivable and accounts payable are non-interest bearing. Financial assets and financial liabilities with variable interest rates expose the Company to cash flow interest rate risk. The Company does not have any debt instruments outstanding with variable interest rates at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 (see note Note 8 - "Debt" in the consolidated financial statements). Changes in market interest rates cause the fair value of long-term debt with fixed interest rates to fluctuate; however, does not impact net income as the Company records debt at amortized cost, and the carrying value does not change as interest rates change.
68
Credit Risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligation, resulting in financial loss to the Company. Such risks arise primarily from certain financial assets held by the Company consisting of accounts receivable, note receivables, and deposits. The Company applies the current expected credit loss ("CECL") standard to estimate its allowance for credit losses on all receivables. The loss allowance provision is based on the Company’s historical collection and loss experience as well as forward-looking factors, where appropriate.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its obligations as they become due. The Company manages liquidity risk by evaluating working capital and forecasting long-term financial liabilities, as well as forecasting cash inflows and outflows from business operations. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents balances at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, were $22,618 and $47,820, respectively. Net working capital at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, was $31,046 and $54,526, respectively.
69
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | |||||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: | |||||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: | |||||
70
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Charlotte’s Web Holdings Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Charlotte’s Web Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, the related consolidated statement of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Notes 2 and 15 to the financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Accounting Standard Update 2023-07 Segment Information in 2024 on a retrospective basis. We have also audited the adjustments necessary to retrospectively apply the change in the December 31, 2023 segment information as provided in Note 15. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the Company’s December 31, 2023 financial statements other than with respect to the adjustment and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the December 31, 2023 financial statements as whole.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit includes performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since August 2024.
March 19, 2025
71
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply Accounting Standards Update 2023-07—Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements To Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”) described in Notes 2 and 15, the consolidated balance sheet of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2023, the related consolidated statement of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”) (the 2023 consolidated financial statements, before the effects of the adjustments discussed in Notes 2 and 15, are not presented herein). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply ASU 2023-07 described in Notes 2 and 15, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Change in Accounting Principle
We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively apply ASC 2023-07 described in Notes 2 and 15 and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We served as the Company’s auditor from 2019 to 2024.
March 21, 2024
72
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||||
Current assets: | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | |||||||||||
Inventories, net | |||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |||||||||||
Total current assets | |||||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | |||||||||||
| License and media rights | |||||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | |||||||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated entity | |||||||||||
| SBH purchase option and other derivative assets | |||||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | |||||||||||
| Other long-term assets | |||||||||||
Total assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | $ | |||||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities | |||||||||||
Lease obligations – current | |||||||||||
| License and media rights payable - current | |||||||||||
Total current liabilities | |||||||||||
| Convertible debenture | |||||||||||
Lease obligations | |||||||||||
| License and media rights payable | |||||||||||
Derivative and other long-term liabilities | |||||||||||
Total liabilities | |||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | |||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | |||||||||||
Common shares, nil par value; unlimited shares authorized; | |||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | |||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | $ | |||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
73
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Cost of goods sold | |||||||||||
| Gross profit | |||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | |||||||||||
Asset impairment | |||||||||||
Operating loss | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Gain on initial investment in unconsolidated entity | |||||||||||
Change in fair value of financial instruments | |||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | ( | ||||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
Income tax expense | ( | ( | |||||||||
Net loss | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
Per common share amounts (Note 12) | |||||||||||
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
74
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except share amounts)
Common Shares | Additional Paid-in Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance—December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common shares issued upon vesting of restricted share units, net of withholdings | — | ( | — | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance—December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common shares issued upon vesting of restricted share units, net of withholding | — | ( | — | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance—December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
75
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||
Net loss | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | |||||||||||
Change in fair value of financial instruments | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Gain on initial investment in unconsolidated entity | ( | ||||||||||
| Convertible debenture and other accrued interest | |||||||||||
Gain on foreign currency transaction | ( | ||||||||||
Share-based compensation | |||||||||||
| Changes in right-of-use assets | |||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses | |||||||||||
Inventory provision | |||||||||||
| Asset impairment | |||||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | ( | ||||||||||
Inventories, net | ( | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | ( | ( | |||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities | ( | ||||||||||
| License and media rights payable | ( | ( | |||||||||
Income tax and other receivable | |||||||||||
Other operating assets and liabilities, net | ( | ||||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | ( | ( | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||
| Purchases of property and equipment and intangible assets | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of assets | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities | ( | ( | |||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||
| Other financing activities | ( | ( | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | ( | ( | |||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | ( | ( | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents —beginning of year | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents —end of year | $ | $ | |||||||||
Non-cash activities: | |||||||||||
| Non-cash issuance of note receivable | ( | ||||||||||
Non-cash purchases of property and equipment and intangibles | ( | ( | |||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
76
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Description of the Business
Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. together with its subsidiaries, (collectively "Charlotte's Web" or the "Company") is a public company incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Province of British Columbia and a Certified B Corp. The Company's common shares are publicly listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") under the symbol "CWEB" and quoted on the OTCQX under the symbol "CWBHF." The Company's corporate headquarters is located in Louisville, Colorado, in the United States of America. The majority of the Company's business is conducted in the United States of America.
The Company's primary products are made from proprietary strains of whole-plant hemp extracts containing a full spectrum of phytocannabinoids, terpenes, flavonoids, and other hemp compounds. Hemp extracts are produced from the plant Cannabis sativa L. ("cannabis" or "CBD"), and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol ("THC") concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis ("hemp"). The Company is engaged in research involving the effectiveness of a broad variety of compounds derived from hemp. The Company does not currently produce or sell medical or recreational marijuana or products derived from high THC cannabis plants. The Company does not currently have any plans to expand into such high THC products in the near future.
The Company's current product categories include full-spectrum hemp extract oil tinctures (liquid product), gummies, capsules, soft-gels, CBD topical creams and lotions, broad-spectrum botanical CBD, functional mushrooms, and pet products. The Company’s products are distributed through its e-commerce website, third-party e-commerce websites, select distributors, health practitioners, and a variety of brick-and-mortar specialty retailers.
The Company grows its proprietary hemp domestically in the United States on farms leased in northeastern Colorado and sources hemp through contract farming operations in Arizona, Colorado, Kentucky, and Canada. The hemp grown in Canada is utilized exclusively in the Canadian markets or for research purposes and not in products sold within the United States.
In furtherance of the Company's research and development ("R&D") efforts, the Company established CW Labs, an internal division for R&D, to expand the Company's efforts around the science of hemp-derived compounds. CW Labs is currently engaged in clinical trials addressing hemp-based health solutions. CW Labs is located in Louisville, Colorado at the Company's current good manufacturing practice ("cGMP") production and distribution facility.
Emerging Growth Company Status
The Company is an emerging growth company ("EGC"), as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the "JOBS Act"). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. The Company has elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, and as a result of this election, the consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company FASB standards' effective dates. The Company can elect to early adopt, if permitted by the accounting standard. The Company may take advantage of these exemptions up until the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of an offering or such earlier time that it is no longer an EGC.
Smaller Reporting Company Status
The Company is a "smaller reporting company" as defined in the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act") Rule 12b-2. As a result, the Company is eligible to take advantage of certain reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise applicable to public companies including; however, not limited to, not being subject to the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Company will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the aggregate worldwide market value of its common shares held by non-affiliates equaled or exceeded $250 million as of the prior June 30th, or (2) its annual revenues equaled or exceeded $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the aggregate worldwide market value of its common shares held by non-affiliates equaled or exceeded $700 million as of the prior June 30th.
77
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND USE OF ESTIMATES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Unless otherwise indicated, comparisons are to comparable prior periods, and 2024 and 2023 refer to the 12 months ended December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make informed estimates, judgments, and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, and the disclosures in the accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates such estimates and assumptions for continued reasonableness. In particular, management makes estimates with respect to any (i) inventory provision, (ii) underlying assumptions that affect the potential impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets, (iii) ability to realize income tax benefits associated with deferred tax assets, (iv) underlying assumptions that affect the fair value of the SBH purchase option, other derivative instruments, and investments in unconsolidated entities. Appropriate adjustments, if any, to the estimates used are made prospectively based upon such periodic evaluation. Management's estimates are based on historical information available at the date of the consolidated financial statements and various other assumptions management believes are reasonable based on the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Reclassifications and prior period presentations
Certain amounts presented in prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation.
Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the allocated net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share is computed by dividing the allocated net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares together with the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common shares had been issued. Since the Company was in a loss position for the periods presented, basic net loss per share is the same as diluted net loss per share since the effects of potentially dilutive securities are antidilutive.
Segments
Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which discrete financial information is available that is regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. As such, the Company has one operating segment, which is the business of hemp-based CBD wellness products, which makes up substantially all of the revenue at this time. Substantially all long-lived assets are located in the United States and substantially all revenue is attributed to customers based in the United States.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
78
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company's financial instruments that are potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The cash amounts in deposit accounts held in excess of federally-insured limits were $22,367 and $47,570 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses on its cash deposits.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses
Accounts receivable is stated as the amount billed, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses ("ACL"). The Company's ACL is adjusted periodically and is based on management's consideration of the age and nature of the past due accounts as well as specific payment issues. The Company considers as past due any receivable balance not collected within its contractual terms. Changes in the Company's estimate to the ACL is recorded through bad debt expense and individual accounts are charged against the allowance when all reasonable collection efforts are exhausted.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less any applicable selling expenses. Cost includes all expenses for direct raw materials inputs, as well as costs directly attributable to the manufacturing process as well as suitable portions of related production overheads, based on normal operating capacity. Cost is determined by use of the weighted average method. The Company periodically reviews the value of items in inventory and provides write-downs or write-offs of inventory based on its assessment of market conditions, including forecasted demand compared to quantities on hand, as well as other factors such as potential excess or aged inventories, historical annihilation trends of finished goods applied to current inventory of finished goods to estimate current reserve needs, and other factors that affect inventory obsolescence, including State and Federal regulatory considerations. The Company's raw materials inventories of harvested hemp are recorded at cost to harvest. Raw materials costs as well as production costs are included in the carrying value of the Company's finished goods inventory. The Company's inventory production process for cannabinoid products includes the cultivation of botanical raw material. Due to the duration of the cultivation process, a portion of the inventory will not be sold within one year. Consistent with the practice in other industries that cultivate botanical raw materials, all inventory is classified as a current asset. Refer to Note 4 "Inventories" for further discussion.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets were comprised of the following amounts (in thousands):
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | |||||||||||
| License and media rights | |||||||||||
| Other miscellaneous receivables | |||||||||||
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
79
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
| Building | |||||
| Machinery and equipment | |||||
| Furniture and fixtures | |||||
| Leasehold improvements | Shorter of useful life or term of lease ( | ||||
Construction-in-process assets are capitalized during construction and depreciation commences when the asset is placed into service. Significant improvements that extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance which do not extend the useful lives of assets are expensed as incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gains or losses are recognized.
Intangible Assets, Net
Finite Lived Intangible Assets
Finite lived intangible assets consist of software, patents, and licenses. These intangible assets were determined to have finite lives and are amortized over their useful lives. Software is stated at cost less accumulated amortization. The costs of obtaining a patent are capitalized and amortized over its useful life.
Amortization is calculated on the straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives of the assets:
Software | |||||
Patents | |||||
Capitalized Software Development Costs
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
80
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
The Company has a variable interest in the investment in DeFloria; however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of DeFloria as it lacks the power to direct DeFloria's key activities. The Company concluded that the investment in DeFloria should not be consolidated. In accordance with ASC 825-10, equity method investments are eligible for the fair value option as they represent recognized financial assets. As the Company was not required to consolidate the investment and does not meet any of the other scope exceptions, the Company had the ability to adopt the fair value option for the investment at inception. The investment was remeasured at fair value after each reporting date, with changes recognized in consolidated statements of operations, as changes in fair value of financial instruments for the period.
Leases
The Company determines if an arrangement contains a lease at inception based on whether there is an identified asset and whether the Company controls the use of the identified asset throughout the period of use. Arrangements containing leases are classified as either finance or operating. The Company does not have any finance leases. For operating leases, right-of-use ("ROU") assets are recognized at the lease commencement date and represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term. Lease obligations are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of future lease payments over the remaining lease term.
Present value of lease payments are discounted based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate, as the Company’s operating leases generally do not provide an implicit rate. The estimated incremental borrowing rate is based on the information available at the lease commencement date for collateralized borrowings with a similar term, an amount equal to the lease payments and in a similar economic environment where the leased asset is located. The collateralized borrowings were based on the Company’s credit rating corroborated with market credit metrics like debt level and interest coverage.
Options to renew or terminate the lease are recognized as part of the Company’s ROU assets and lease liabilities when it is reasonably certain the options will be exercised. ROU assets are also assessed for impairments consistent with the Company’s long-lived asset policy.
Operating lease expense for fixed lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments for real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance, and utilities, which are generally based on the Company’s pro rata share of the total property, are not included in the measurement of the ROU assets or lease liabilities and are expensed as incurred.
Operating leases are presented separately as operating lease right-of-use assets, net and lease obligations, current and non-current, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less, that do not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise, are not recorded on the balance sheet.
Convertible Debenture
The Company determined that the debenture is a freestanding financial instrument, which includes embedded derivatives. The embedded derivatives have been bifurcated from the debenture and accounted for separately in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Company reviewed the terms of the debenture and identified two material embedded features which required bifurcation and separate accounting pursuant to the provisions of ASC 815: i) the interest rate conversion feature based on changes in federal regulations, and ii) the debt conversion option to common shares. The debt interest rate conversion feature is classified as a derivative asset and measured at fair value using a probability weighted income approach. The debt conversion option is classified as a derivative liability and measured at fair value using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company allocated proceeds first to the derivatives measured at fair value and the residual amount is allocated to the debenture. Debt issuance costs are allocated to the debenture. The debt issuance costs are presented as a direct reduction from the face value of the debenture and amortized over the stated term of the debenture. Refer to Note 3 "Fair Value Measurement" and Note 8 "Debt" for additional discussion regarding the convertible debenture and derivative instruments.
81
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from customers when control of the goods or services are transferred to the customer. This generally occurs when products are shipped, at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. Freight revenue is included in revenue on the consolidated statements of operations, and is generally exempt from state sales taxes. Sales tax collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis and therefore are excluded from revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.
Contracts are written to include standard discounts and allowances. Contracts are not written to include advertising allowances, tiered discounts or any other performance obligation. Since the Company’s contracts involve the delivery of various tangible products, the arrangements are considered to contain only a single performance obligation, as such there is no allocation of the transaction price.
The Company also offers e-commerce discounts and promotions through its online rewards program. The Charlotte’s Web Loyalty Program offers customers rewards points for every dollar spent through the Company website to earn store credit for future purchases. The Company defers recognition of revenue for unredeemed awards until the following occurs: i) rewards are redeemed by the consumer, ii) points or certificates expire, or iii) an estimate of the expected unused portion of points or certificates is applied, which is based on historical redemption patterns.
Any product that doesn't meet the customer’s expectations can be returned within the first 30 days of delivery in exchange for another product or for a full refund. Any product sold through a distributor or retailer must be returned in the original purchase location for any return or exchange. The Company accounts for customer returns utilizing the "expected value method". Expected amounts are excluded from revenue and recorded as a "refund liability" that represents the Company’s obligation to return the customer’s consideration. Estimates are based on actual historical and current specific data.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Product revenue | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Service revenue | |||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | $ | |||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold primarily consists of the inventory and production costs for the Company’s products sold during the period, and also includes amortization and depreciation, as well as allocated expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, cost of goods sold includes $4,154 and $1,039 in inventory provision, respectively. Refer to Note 4 "Inventories" for further discussion.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consists of compensation and other personnel-related costs, amortization and depreciation, share-based compensation, marketing and advertising expenses, professional services fees, rent and related costs, insurance premiums, as well as bank and merchant fees. Advertising expenses are expensed as incurred and primarily includes the cost of marketing activities such as online advertising, search engine optimization, promotional activities, and market research. For the year ended
82
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Defined Contribution Plan
Share-based Compensation
The Company accounts for compensation expense for share-based option awards to employees, non-employee directors, and other non-employees based on the estimated grant date fair value of the options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period for stock options. The fair value of stock options are estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires assumptions and judgments regarding stock price, volatility, risk-free interest rates, dividend yields, and expected option terms. The Company uses the historical volatility and grant date closing price of its publicly traded shares to estimate the grant-date fair value of its stock options. Share-based compensation is recognized net of actual forfeitures when they occur. All share-based compensation costs are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in selling, general and administrative expense.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the temporary difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal income tax rate in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is based on the changes in the deferred income tax assets or liabilities from period to period. A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. The Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered as deductions from future taxable income. The evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance is performed on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis and includes a review of all available positive and negative evidence. Factors reviewed include projections of pre-tax book income for the foreseeable future, determination of cumulative pre-tax book income or loss, earnings history, and reliability of forecasting. It is the Company's policy to offset indefinite lived deferred tax assets with indefinite lived deferred tax liabilities. The Company provided a full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets because it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company accounts for uncertainties in income taxes under Topic 740, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement methodology to recognize and measure an income tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. With respect to any tax positions that do not meet the recognition threshold, a corresponding liability, including interest and penalties, is recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The Company may be subject to examination by tax authorities where the Company conducts operations. The Company’s tax years prior to 2019 are closed for federal income tax purposes. The Company’s 2019 tax year was opened for examination by the IRS during the second half of 2023. The statute of limitations on assessment with respect to the Company’s 2019 Form 1120 remains open until December 31, 2025, pursuant to an agreed-upon extension to the applicable statute of limitations. The Company’s 2021 through 2023 tax years remain open until the general statute of limitations lapses for each respective tax year. Refer to Note 14 "Income Taxes" for disclosures on uncertain tax positions. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties on taxes, if any, as income tax expense.
83
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
New accounting pronouncements recently adopted
In November 2023 the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2023-07—Segment Reporting. The guidance was issued to provide financial statement users with more disaggregated expense information about a public entity’s reportable segments. The guidance is effective for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the expanded interim disclosures are effective in entities in 2025 and will be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented. Refer to Note 15 "Operating Segment" for additional disclosures.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Other than described below, no new accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB had or may have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20): Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments. The guidance clarifies the requirements for determining whether certain settlements of convertible debt instruments should be accounted for as an induced conversion. ASU 2024-04 is effective for the Company beginning December 31, 2025. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting this ASU.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The new guidance requires disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses for public business entities. ASU 2024-03 is effective for the Company beginning December 31, 2026. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting this ASU.
In December 2023 the FASB issued a final standard on improvements to income tax disclosures, ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The standard requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. The standard is intended to benefit investors by providing more detailed income tax disclosures that would be useful in making capital allocation decisions. For public business entities, the new requirements is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the updated standard will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value.
Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date
Level 2—Inputs are observable, unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities
Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market data for the related assets or liabilities
The categorization of a financial instrument within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and other receivables, notes receivable and payable, SBH purchase option and asset derivatives, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, cultivation liabilities, convertible debenture, liability derivatives, investment in unconsolidated entity, and other current assets and liabilities. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and other receivables, accounts payable and other current assets and liabilities approximated fair values because of their short-term nature. The carrying value of the notes
84
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
receivable and cultivation liability approximates the fair value as the stated interest rate approximates market rates currently available to the Company. The carrying value of the convertible debenture approximates the fair value after adjustments for the bifurcated embedded derivatives and other discounts, refer to Note 8 "Debt" note for additional fair value disclosures.
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2024 and 2023, by level within the fair value hierarchy:
| December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stanley Brothers USA Holdings purchase option | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Debt interest rate conversion feature | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total financial assets | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated entity: | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt conversion option | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stanley Brothers USA Holdings purchase option | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Debt interest rate conversion feature | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total financial assets | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated entity: | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt conversion option | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
There were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy and there were no changes in the fair value methodologies during the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
Investment in Unconsolidated Entity
On April 6, 2023, the Company jointly formed an entity, DeFloria, with AJNA BioSciences ("AJNA"), and a subsidiary of British American Tobacco ("BAT"). AJNA is a botanical drug development company. AJNA is partially owned and was co-founded by a member of the Stanley Brothers. The entity was established to pursue FDA-approval for a botanical drug to target a certain neurological condition.
As of December 31, 2024, BAT holds an equity interest in DeFloria in the form of 2,000,000 or 100 % preferred units (200,000 preferred units as of December 31, 2023) following its $10 million initial investment and has the right to participate in future equity issuances to maintain its pro rata equity position. In 2024, BAT and AJNA invested an additional $5 million and $2 million, respectively, into DeFloria in exchange for a convertible debenture. The Company and AJNA each hold 4,000,000 50 400,000
85
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
which the Company supplies the oils at cost used to produce and develop the new drug. AJNA's contribution to the entity is laboratory and regulatory services, clinical expertise, and the provision of clinical services. DeFloria used the investments for the clinical development of a hemp botanical Investigational New Drug application and has concluded Phase I clinical development.
Concurrently with the formation of DeFloria, the Company was issued a warrant to purchase 865,052 shares of Class A Common Stock of AJNA for an exercise price of $2.89 per share. Management determined the warrant should be accounted for in accordance with ASC 321, which requires the warrant to be measured at fair value at issuance and subsequently remeasured at fair value each reporting period. All changes from the remeasurement of the warrant will be recorded as a change in fair value of financial instruments in the statements of operations. The Company determined the fair value of the AJNA warrants to be de minimis and as such no value was recorded as of December 31, 2024.
The Company determined that it has a variable interest in the investment in DeFloria; however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of DeFloria as it lacks the power to direct DeFloria's key activities. The Company concluded that the investment in DeFloria should not be consolidated. The maximum exposure to loss in the investment in DeFloria is limited to the Company's investment, which is represented by the financial statement carrying amount of its retained interest.
In accordance with ASC 825-10, equity method investments are eligible for the fair value option as they represent recognized financial assets. As the Company is not required to consolidate the investment and does not meet any of the other scope exceptions, the Company had the ability to adopt the fair value option for the investment at inception. Upon formation of the entity, the Company elected the fair value option because it allowed the investment to be valued based on current market conditions. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized a gain for the initial investment in DeFloria of $10,700 within the consolidated statement of operations.
The investment has been remeasured at fair value at each reporting date, with changes recognized in consolidated statements of operations as changes in fair value of financial instruments for the period. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, a loss of $200 and a gain of $300 , respectively, related to the investment in DeFloria was recognized as a change in fair value of financial instruments in the consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the DeFloria investment represents an investment of $10,800 and $11,000 , respectively, within the consolidated balance sheets.
The use of assumptions for the fair value determination includes a high degree of subjectivity and judgment using unobservable inputs (level 3 on the fair value hierarchy), which results in estimation uncertainty. To determine the value of the investment, the Company utilizes an Option Pricing Model ("OPM"). The OPM considers the various terms of the stockholder agreements, including the level of seniority among the securities, dividend policy, conversion ratios, and cash allocations upon liquidation of the entity. The OPM is appropriate when the range of potential future outcomes is difficult to predict with any certainty.
The following additional assumptions are used in the model:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
Expected term (years) | |||||||||||||||||
| Volatility | |||||||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | |||||||||||||||||
| Expected dividend yield | |||||||||||||||||
| Discount for lack of marketability | |||||||||||||||||
Convertible Debt Derivatives
On November 14, 2022, the Company entered into a subscription agreement (the "Subscription Agreement") with BT DE Investments, Inc. a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAT Group (LSE: BATS and NYSE: BTI) (the "Lender"), providing for the issuance of a $56.8 million (C$75.3 million) convertible debenture (the "debenture"). The debenture is convertible into 19.9 % ownership of the Company's common
86
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
shares at a conversion price of C$2.00 per common share of the Company on the TSX. The debenture will accrue interest at a stated annualized rate of 5 % until such time that there is federal regulation permitting the use of cannabidiol, a phytocannabinoid derived from the plant Cannabis sativa L. as an ingredient in food products and dietary supplements in the United States. (The term "federal regulation" is defined as the date that federal laws in the United States permit, authorize or do not prohibit the use of CBD as an ingredient in food products and dietary supplements). Following federal regulation of CBD, the annualized rate of interest shall reduce to 1.5 %. The maturity date for the debenture is November 14, 2029 (the "Maturity Date").
The Company determined that the debenture did not meet the definition of a freestanding derivative under ASC 815 "Fair Value Measurement for financial statement", and required the bifurcation of two embedded derivatives, the debt interest rate conversion feature and the debt conversion option.
Debt Interest Rate Conversion Feature
The debt interest rate conversion feature is classified as a financial asset and is remeasured at fair value at each reporting date, with changes recognized in consolidated statements of operations as changes in fair value of financial instruments for the period. The use of assumptions for the fair value determination includes a high degree of subjectivity and judgment using unobservable inputs (level 3 on the fair value hierarchy), which results in estimation uncertainty. The debt interest rate conversion feature, if triggered, reduces the stated interest rate of the debenture to 1.5 % upon federal regulation of CBD in the United States.
For the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, a gain of $228 and a loss of $471 , respectively, related to the debt interest rate conversion feature was recognized as a change in fair value of financial instruments in the consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the debt interest rate conversion feature represents a financial asset of $1,023 and $872 , respectively, within in the consolidated balance sheets.
To determine the value of the option, the Company utilizes a probability weighted income approach. This method calculates the present value of the reduced interest accrued on the debenture assuming the feature is triggered at a certain time, after accounting for the probability of federal regulation of CBD. This approach is useful when ultimate valuation is based on an unverifiable outcome, such as an event outside of the Company’s influence. The following additional assumptions are used in the model:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
| Stated interest rate | |||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted interest rate | |||||||||||||||||
| Implied debt yield | |||||||||||||||||
| Federal regulation probability | various | various | |||||||||||||||
| Year of event | various | various | |||||||||||||||
Debt Conversion Option
Per the debenture, the Lender has the option, at any time before the Maturity Date at no additional consideration, for all or any part of the principal amount to be converted into fully paid and non-assessable common shares. The Company assessed this conversion feature and determined that the debt conversion option is an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation and is classified as a financial liability. The debt conversion option is initially measured at fair value and is revalued at each reporting period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on Level 2 observable inputs. The assumptions used by the Company are the quoted price of the Company’s common shares in an active market, risk-free interest rate, volatility and expected life, and assumes no dividends. Volatility is based on the actual historical market activity of the Company’s shares. The expected life is based on the remaining contractual term of the debenture and the risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury Securities with a maturity equivalent to the expected maturity of the debenture.
87
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
For the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, a gain of $2,265 and $10,080 , respectively, related to the debt conversion option was recognized as a change in fair value of financial instruments in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the debt conversion option represents a financial liability of $786 and $3,213 , respectively, within in the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table provides the assumptions regarding Level 2 fair value measurements inputs at their measurement dates:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
Expected volatility | |||||||||||||||||
Expected term (years) | |||||||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | |||||||||||||||||
Expected dividend yield | |||||||||||||||||
Value of underlying share | C$ | C$ | |||||||||||||||
| Exercise price | C$ | C$ | |||||||||||||||
Stanley Brothers USA Holdings Purchase Option
In 2021, the Company entered into an optionpurchase agreement (the "SBH Purchase Option") with Stanley Brothers USA Holdings, Inc. ("Stanley Brothers USA"). The SBH Purchase Option was purchased for total consideration of $8,000 and has a term of five years (extendable for an additional two years upon payment of additional consideration). The SBH Purchase Option provides the Company the option to acquire all or substantially all the shares of Stanley Brothers USA, at a purchase price to be determined at the time of exercise of the SBH Purchase Option. Upon exercise of the SBH Purchase Option, the purchase price will be determined based on application of predetermined multiples of Stanley Brothers USA revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") measures. The Company is not obligated to exercise the SBH Purchase Option. As part of the SBH Purchase Option agreement, Stanley Brothers USA issued the Company a warrant exercisable to purchase 10 % of the outstanding Stanley Brothers USA shares and convertible securities that are considered in-the-money, subject to certain conditions and exclusions. The warrant is exercisable at the Company's election for a nominal exercise price in the event the Company elects not to acquire all or substantially all shares of Stanley Brothers USA and expires 60 days after the expiration of the option.
The Company elected the fair value option in accordance with ASC 825-10 guidance to record its SBH Purchase Option. The SBH Purchase Option is classified as a financial asset and is remeasured at fair value at each reporting date, with changes to fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the period. The use of assumptions for the fair value determination includes a high degree of subjectivity and judgment using unobservable inputs (level 3 on the fair value hierarchy), which results in estimation uncertainty. Changes in assumptions that reasonably could have been different at the reporting date may result in a higher or lower determination of fair value. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, a loss of $1,678 and $570 , respectively, related to the SBH Purchase Option was recognized as change in fair value of financial instruments in the statements of operations. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the SBH Purchase Option represents a financial asset of $52 and $1,730 , respectively, within SBH purchase option and other derivative assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
88
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
The Monte Carlo valuation model considers multiple revenue and EBITDA outcomes for Stanley Brothers USA and other probabilities in assigning a fair value. Primary assumptions utilized include financial projections of Stanley Brothers USA and the probability and timing of exercise. The following additional assumptions are used in the fair value model of the SBH Purchase Option:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Expected volatility | |||||||||||
Expected term (years) | |||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | |||||||||||
Weighted average cost of capital | |||||||||||
4. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Harvested hemp and seeds | $ | $ | |||||||||
Raw materials | |||||||||||
Finished goods | |||||||||||
Less: inventory provision | ( | ( | |||||||||
Total | $ | $ | |||||||||
Inventory Provision
For the year ended December 31, 2024, inventory provisions of $4,154 were expensed through cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2024, write-offs of inventory previously reserved of $6,386 were recognized. For the year ended December 31, 2023, inventory provisions of $1,039 were expensed through cost of goods sold and write-offs of inventory previously reserved for of $29,238 were recognized.
89
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment consist of the following:
December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Building | $ | $ | |||||||||
Machinery and equipment | |||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | |||||||||||
Leasehold improvements | |||||||||||
| $ | $ | ||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | ( | ( | |||||||||
Construction-in-process | |||||||||||
Total property and equipment, net | $ | $ | |||||||||
Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, was $4,111 and $5,080 , respectively, of which $1,135 and $1,901 , respectively, was recorded in in the consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, depreciation expense of $2,976 and $3,179 , respectively, was recorded in Cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, an impairment loss to building assets of $548 was recorded within Asset Impairment in the consolidated statement of operations. The impairment resulted from a decline in market conditions at the Company's hemp farm that indicated a fair value less than the carrying value.
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Details of the Company’s intangible assets subject to amortization and indefinite-lived intangible assets and their respective carrying amounts are as follows:
As of December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Remaining Useful Life (in years) | Gross | Accumulated Amortization | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Definite-lived intangible assets: | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Remaining Useful Life (in years) | Gross | Accumulated Amortization | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||
Definite-lived intangibles assets : | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Indefinite lived intangible assets: | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
90
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
For the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, amortization expense of intangible assets of $218 and $849 , respectively, was recorded in Selling, general, and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2024, expected amortization of intangible assets is as follows:
Year Ending December 31: | |||||
| 2025 | $ | ||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
| 2028 | |||||
| 2029 | |||||
Thereafter | |||||
Total future amortization | $ | ||||
7. LICENSE AND MEDIA RIGHTS
MLB Promotion Rights Agreement
On October 11, 2022, the Company entered into a Promotional Rights Agreement (the "MLB Promotional Rights Agreement") with MLB Advanced Media L.P., on its own behalf and on behalf of Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, The MLB Network, LLC and the Major League Baseball Clubs (collectively, the "MLB"), pursuant to which the Company entered into a strategic partnership with MLB to promote the Company’s NSF Certified for Sport® product line. On February 5, 2024, the Company and MLB entered into the First Amendment to the Promotional Rights Agreement ("First Amendment"). The First Amendment extended the agreement through December 31, 2027, with an aggregate rights fee of $23.0 million for the remainder of the term.
As consideration under the MLB promotional rights agreement, the Company has paid and is committed to pay a combination of cash over the license period, along with upfront non-cash consideration in the form of equity, as well as contingent consideration in the form of contingent payments based on revenue. The consideration was as follows: 4 % of the Company’s fully diluted outstanding common shares; $31.5 million in cash consideration from 2022 through 2027, paid in accordance with the payment schedule below; 10 % royalty on the Company’s gross revenue from the sale of MLB branded products, after cumulative gross sales of all such branded products exceed $18.0 million.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying value of the licensed properties was $11,691 and $14,589 , respectively, recorded as a license and media rights asset within the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying value of the media rights was $3,000 and $4,982 recorded as a prepaid asset and a license and media rights asset within the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognized $4,897 and $9,794 , respectively, in amortization expense related to the license and media rights assets for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Licensed properties are amortized straight line and media rights are amortized as incurred.
For the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company paid MLB $5,000 and $8,000 as part of the committed cash payments.
91
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Maturities of the MLB license and media rights payable as of December 31, 2024 are as follows:
Year Ending December 31: | |||||
| 2025 | |||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | $ | ||||
Total payments | $ | ||||
Less: Imputed interest | ( | ||||
Total license and media rights payable | $ | ||||
Less: Current license liabilities | ( | ||||
Total non-current license and media rights payable | $ | ||||
As of December 31, 2024, expected amortization of licensed properties is as follows:
Year Ending December 31: | |||||
| 2025 | $ | ||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
Total future amortization | $ | ||||
8. DEBT
Convertible Debenture
On November 2022, the Company entered into the Subscription Agreement with BT DE Investments, Inc., providing for the issuance of a $56.8 million (C$75.3 million) convertible debenture. The debenture was denominated in Canadian Dollars ("CAD" or "C$"). The debenture is convertible into 19.9 % ownership of the Company’s Common Shares at a conversion price of C$2.00 per Common Share of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX"). The debenture will accrue interest at a stated annualized rate of 5 % until such time that there is federal regulation permitting the use of CBD as an ingredient in food products and dietary supplements in the United States. Following federal regulation of CBD, the stated annualized rate of interest shall be reduced to 1.5 %. Interest is accrued annually and payable on the maturity date or date of earlier conversion. The maturity date for the debenture is November 14, 2029.
The following is a summary of the Company's convertible debenture as of December 31, 2024:
As of December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||
| Principal Amount | Unamortized Debt Discount and Costs | Net Carrying Amount | |||||||||
| Convertible Debenture | |||||||||||
| Convertible debenture due November 2029 | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||
The following is a summary of the Company's convertible debenture as of December 31, 2023:
As of December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||
| Principal Amount | Unamortized Debt Discount and Costs | Net Carrying Amount | |||||||||
| Convertible Debenture | |||||||||||
| Convertible debenture due November 2029 | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||
92
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
The debenture was C$75.3 million per the subscription agreement and translated to USD on the transaction date. The Company remeasures the debenture at each balance sheet date using the CAD to USD exchange rate as of that balance sheet date. The Company recognizes the resulting foreign currency gain or loss within the statement of operations during the period. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized a foreign currency gain of $3,546 and a loss of $866 , respectively, related to the net carrying value of the debenture within other income (expense), net in the statement of operations.
Interest is accrued annually and payable on the maturity date or date of earlier conversion. On conversion, accrued interest will either be converted into common shares equal to the amount of accrued interest or will be paid in cash if agreed with the Lender. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the principal amount of the debenture includes $6,078 and $3,182 , respectively, of accrued interest expense.
The following is a summary of the interest expense and amortization expense, recorded within the statement of operation, of the Company's convertible debenture for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| Interest and Amortization Expense | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of debt discounts and costs | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Contingencies
10. LEASES
The Company has lease arrangements related to office space, warehouse and production space, and land to facilitate agricultural operations. The leases have remaining lease terms of less than 0.7 years to 10.2 years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 5 years. Generally, the lease agreements do not include options to terminate the lease.
The weighted average remaining lease term was 9.1 years for operating leases as of December 31, 2024. The weighted average discount rate was 5.7 % for operating leases as of December 31, 2024.
The components of lease cost, including variable lease costs primarily consisting of common area maintenance charges and real estate taxes, for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Operating Lease Cost: | |||||||||||
Fixed lease cost | $ | $ | |||||||||
Variable lease cost | |||||||||||
Total lease cost | $ | $ | |||||||||
Sublease income | |||||||||||
93
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Other information related to leases was as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: | |||||||||||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |||||||||||
Operating cash flows for operating leases | $ | $ | |||||||||
Maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2024 are as follows:
| Operating Leases | |||||
Year Ending December 31: | |||||
| 2025 | $ | ||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
| 2028 | |||||
| 2029 | |||||
Thereafter | |||||
Total lease obligation | $ | ||||
Less: Imputed interest | ( | ||||
Total lease liabilities | $ | ||||
Less: Current lease liabilities | |||||
Total non-current lease liabilities | $ | ||||
11. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company’s share capital consists of one class of issued and outstanding shares: Common Shares. The Company is also authorized to issue preferred shares issuable in series. To date, no
Common Shares
As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company was authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, which have nil par value.
Dividend Rights – Holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends out of the assets available for the payment of dividends at such times and in such amount and form as the Board of Directors may determine from time to time. The Company is permitted to pay dividends unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that the Company is insolvent or the payment of the dividend would render the Company insolvent.
Voting Rights – Holders of common shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend and vote at all meetings of Shareholders of the Company except a meeting at which only the holders of another class or series of shares is entitled to vote. Each common share shall entitle the holder thereof to one vote at each such meeting.
Liquidation Rights – Holders of common shares will be entitled to receive all of the Company's assets remaining after payment of all debts and other liabilities, subject to any preferential rights of the holders of any outstanding preferred shares.
94
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
12. LOSS PER SHARE
The Company computes loss per share of common shares. Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares together with the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common shares had been issued, unless anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and dilutive net loss per share attributable to Common Shareholders:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
| Weighted-average number of common shares - basic | |||||||||||
| Dilutive effect of stock options and awards | |||||||||||
Weighted-average number of common shares - diluted | |||||||||||
| Loss per common share – basic and diluted | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, potentially dilutive securities include stock options, restricted share units, and convertible debenture conversion. When the Company recognizes a net loss from continuing operations, all potentially dilutive shares are anti-dilutive and are consequently excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share. The potentially dilutive awards outstanding for each year are presented in the table below:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Outstanding options | |||||||||||
| Outstanding restricted share units | |||||||||||
Total | |||||||||||
Convertible debenture conversion
The Company's debenture is convertible into 19.9 % ownership of the Company’s common shares at a conversion price of C2.00 per common share of the Company. The Company can settle the convertible debenture in shares. If the convertible debenture in diluted EPS is anti-dilutive, or if the conversion value of the debenture does not exceed their conversion price for a reporting period, then the shares underlying the notes will not be reflected in the Company’s calculation of diluted EPS. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the price of the Company’s shares did not exceed the conversion price and therefore there was no impact to potential common share diluted EPS during those periods. Conversely, income available to common stockholders will be impacted by interest expense of $6,078 and amortization of debt issuance costs of $3,352 related to the debenture.
Additionally, the Company evaluated the calculation for diluted EPS for the non-contingent conversion feature. Non-contingent features are considered at the option of the Lender at any time before maturity. The Company noted that only the non-contingent conversion feature requires further analysis for diluted EPS as there are no contingencies under the Subscription Agreement and common shares will be issued on conversion. The Company evaluated that the potential adjustments to the income available to common stockholders will include the after-tax amount of interest and other consequential changes in income or expense that would result from the assumed conversion, if any. The potential adjustment to the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding is based on the additional common shares resulting from the assumed conversion. The Company will consider the conversion feature only if it will have dilutive impact, not anti-dilutive.
95
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
13. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Share Incentive Plans
2015 Plan
On December 31, 2015, the Company adopted the Stanley Brothers, Inc. 2015 Stock Option Plan (the "2015 Plan"), which provides for grants of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to employees (including officers), consultants, and directors. The 2015 Plan, and grants made under the 2015 Plan, were designed to align Shareholder and participant interests. The Company’s board of directors established the terms and conditions of the grants under the 2015 Plan. No further grants are authorized to be made under the 2015 Plan.
2018 Plan
On August 31, 2018, the Company adopted the Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2018 Plan"), which provides for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, share awards, share units, performance shares, performance units, and other share-based awards (collectively the "Awards") to eligible individuals on the terms and subject to conditions set forth in the 2018 Plan. The 2018 Plan is designed to attract and retain key personnel and service providers. The Company’s board of directors, or appointed administrators, establish the terms and conditions of any grants under the 2018 Plan.
The aggregate number of common shares of the Company as to which share incentive awards may be granted from time to time under both the 2015 Plan and 2018 Plan shall not exceed 15,408,505 shares. The maximum exercise period of any option grant shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The share incentive awards vest over a time-based service period, generally a period of to four years , and are settled in equity. The number of available awards at December 31, 2024, was 7,083,172 .
Stock options
Stock options vest over a prescribed service period and are approved by the board of directors on an award-by-award basis. Options have a prescribed service period generally lasting up to four years , with certain options vesting immediately upon issuance. Upon the exercise of any stock options, the Company issues shares to the award holder from the pool of authorized but unissued common shares.
96
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
There were no options granted for the year ended December 31, 2024. The fair values of options granted for the year ended December 31, 2023 were determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model, which requires assumptions and judgments regarding stock price, volatility, risk-free interest rates, dividend yields and expected option terms. The Company uses the historical volatility and grant date closing price of its publicly traded shares to estimate the grant date fair value of its stock options. Due to the lack of historical exercise history, the expected term of the Company’s stock options for employees has been determined utilizing the "simplified" method for awards. The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant of the award for time periods approximately equal to the expected term of the award. Expected dividend yield is zero based on the fact that the Company has never paid cash dividends and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Share-based compensation is recognized net of actual forfeitures when they occur. All share-based compensation costs are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in selling, general and administrative expense.
The following principal inputs were used in the valuation of awards issued for the year ended December 31, 2023:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2023 | |||||||||||
Expected volatility | |||||||||||
Expected term (years) | |||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | |||||||||||
Expected dividend yield | |||||||||||
Value of underlying share | $ | ||||||||||
Detail of the number of stock options outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 under the 2015 and 2018 plans is as follows:
Number of Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Option | Weighted- Average Remaining Contract Term (in years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Granted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited (and expired) | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable/vested as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
For the options outstanding at December 31, 2024, the weighted average remaining contractual life is 7.30 years. There were no options granted during the year ended December 31, 2024.
For the options outstanding at December 31, 2023, weighted average remaining contractual life is 8.56 years. The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2023 was $0.38 .
For the year ending December 31, 2024 and 2023 there were no
97
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Vesting of awards under these plans were generally time based over a period of to four years . For the 1,918,063 option awards vested during the year ended December 31, 2024, the weighted average grant date fair value was $0.64 . For the 1,000,642 option awards vested during the year ended December 31, 2023, the weighted average grant date fair value was $0.72 .
Of the 3,513,079 options outstanding at December 31, 2024, the 2015 Plan has 985,012 options outstanding with an exercise price of $0.56 , and the remaining 2,528,067 options per the 2018 Plan have an exercise price ranging between $0.32 and $11.92 .
Restricted share units
The Company has issued time-based restricted share units to certain employees as permitted under the 2018 Plan. The restricted share units granted vest in accordance with the board-approved agreement, typically over equal installments over to four years . Upon vesting, one share of the Company’s common shares is issued for each restricted share awarded. The fair value of each restricted share unit granted is equal to the market price of the Company’s shares at the date of the grant. The fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $1,089 and $1,450 , respectively.
Details of the number of restricted share units outstanding under the 2018 Plan is as follows:
Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2023 | $ | ||||||||||
Granted | |||||||||||
Forfeited | ( | ||||||||||
Vested | ( | ||||||||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2024 | $ | ||||||||||
Share-based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense for all equity arrangements for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $1,520 and $2,100 , respectively, included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2024, and 2023, there was approximately $1,164 and $2,656 of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense, related to unvested options granted to employees under the Company’s share option plan that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.87
14. INCOME TAXES
Income Taxes
Loss before provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 consists of the following:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
U.S. loss | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
| Foreign income (loss) | |||||||||||
| Total current | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
98
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
The major components of income tax expense attributable to loss from operations consists of:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Current: | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | $ | |||||||||
State | ( | ||||||||||
Foreign | |||||||||||
| Total current | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||
Federal | ( | ||||||||||
State | ( | ||||||||||
Foreign | |||||||||||
| Total deferred | ( | ||||||||||
Total income tax (expense) benefit | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
Income tax expense attributable to loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rates of 21.0 %, as a result of the following:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| U.S. federal statutory tax rate | |||||||||||
| State taxes, net of federal benefit | |||||||||||
| Share based compensation | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Change in fair value of financial instruments and other | |||||||||||
| Disallowed convertible debt expense | ( | ( | |||||||||
Change in valuation allowance(1) | ( | ( | |||||||||
| R&D credit | |||||||||||
| Rate change | ( | ||||||||||
| Other, net | ( | ||||||||||
Effective tax rate | ( | ( | |||||||||
(1)During the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company maintained a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets.
99
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||||
Net operating loss and other carryforwards | $ | $ | |||||||||
Inventory provision and UNICAP 263A | |||||||||||
| Lease liability | |||||||||||
| Section 174 capitalized costs | |||||||||||
Share-based compensation | |||||||||||
Other | |||||||||||
Total deferred tax assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
Valuation allowance | ( | ( | |||||||||
Total deferred tax assets, net | $ | $ | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Right of use assets | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Investment in unconsolidated entity | ( | ( | |||||||||
Other | ( | ( | |||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
| Net deferred taxes | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
The realization of deferred income tax assets may be dependent on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient income in future years in the associated jurisdiction to which the deferred tax assets relate. The Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial performance. Based on the review of all positive and negative evidence, including a three-year cumulative pre-tax loss, the Company continues to believe its deferred tax assets are more likely to not be realized and, as such, a full valuation allowance is recorded against net deferred taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company’s valuation allowance increased by $6,525 and $8,062 , respectively, primarily related to the incremental net operating losses and an increase to the inventory provision.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company has US federal, US state, and Canadian net operating losses of approximately $283,708 , $236,746 , and $11,432 respectively. The entire US federal NOLs are post-2017 NOL and therefore can be carried forward indefinitely and the US state NOLs will begin to expire in 2030. The Canada NOLs will begin to expire in 2039. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company also has a research and development credit carryforward of $2,404 and $2,791 , respectively, which begin to expire in 2040.
Tax laws impose restrictions on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and research and development credit carryforwards in the event of a change in ownership of the Company as defined by Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and 383. The Company may have experienced ownership changes in the past that impact the availability of its net operating losses and tax credits. Should there be additional ownership changes in the future, the Company's ability to utilize existing carryforwards could be substantially restricted.
100
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Uncertain tax positions
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 is as follows:
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | ||||
| Additions for current year tax positions | |||||
| Additions for prior year tax positions | |||||
| Reductions for prior year tax positions | ( | ||||
| Reductions as a result of settlement with tax authority | |||||
| Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | ||||
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | ||||
| Additions for current year tax positions | |||||
| Additions for prior year tax positions | |||||
| Reductions for prior year tax positions | |||||
| Reductions as a result of settlement with tax authority | |||||
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | ||||
The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is probable that the tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits. The Company measures and records the tax benefits from such a position based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company’s estimated liabilities related to these matters are adjusted in the period in which the uncertain tax position is effectively settled, the statute of limitations for examination expires or when additional information becomes available. The Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits requires the use of assumptions and significant judgment to estimate the exposures associated with the Company's various filing positions. Although the Company believes that the judgments and estimates made are reasonable, actual results could differ and resulting adjustments could materially affect the Company's effective income tax rate and income tax provision. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties on taxes, if any, as income tax expense.
If recognized, no ne of the uncertain tax positions would affect the effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes to the uncertain tax positions in the next twelve months.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state jurisdictions, Canada, and Israel. In the normal course of business, it is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s tax years prior to 2019 are closed for federal income tax purposes. The Company’s 2019 tax year was opened for examination by the IRS during the second half of 2023. The statute of limitations on assessment with respect to the Company’s 2019 Form 1120 remains open until December 31, 2025, pursuant to an agreed-upon extension to the applicable statute of limitations. The Company’s 2021 through 2023 tax years remain open until the general statute of limitations lapses for each respective tax year.
Other Taxes
Employee Retention Credit
The Company qualified for federal government assistance through employee retention credit ("ERC") provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the company received $4,261 , which includes $155 of interest income, related to the ERC.
101
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
15. OPERATING SEGMENT
Segment information
The Company has determined that it operates in a single operating and reportable segment, which is the production and sale of hemp-based CBD wellness products, which makes up substantially all of the revenue at this time. This is consistent with how the chief operating decision maker (the "CODM") allocates resources and assesses performance. The Company’s CODM is the executive operations committee that includes the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the chief operations officer and the chief people officer. The Company’s products have similar characteristics due to the same raw material ingredient (CBD and derivatives), similar nature of cultivation process, the type of customer and the regulatory nature of the industry.
The accounting policies of the production and sale of the hemp-based CBD wellness segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The CODM assesses performance for this segment and decides how to allocate resources based on pre-tax net income/(loss) that is reported on the consolidated statement of operations. The measure of segment assets is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as total assets. The CODM uses pre-tax net income/(loss) to evaluate income generated from segment assets in deciding whether to reinvest profits into the segment or into other parts of the Company. Pre-tax net income/(loss) are used to monitor budget versus actual results.
For the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the segment's revenues and pre-tax net loss were $49,667 and $(29,807 ); and $63,155 and $(23,267 ), respectively. Further details of the segment's revenues are included in Note 2 under Revenue Recognition. Further details of the segment's expenses are included in the consolidated statements of operations. Further details of the segment's reconciliation between pre-tax net income/(loss) are included in the results of operations measures section of this Form 10-K.
There are no difference between segment revenues, pre-tax net income/(loss) and the Company's consolidated revenues and pre-tax net income/(loss).
General Information
Factors used to Identify Reportable Segments: The Company operates as a single reportable segment, focusing on the production and sale of hemp-based CBD wellness products.
Products and Services: The Company's revenue is primarily derived from the production and sale of hemp-based CBD wellness products.
Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM): The Company's Chief Executive Officer is William Morachnick, the Chief Financial Officer is Erika Lind, the Chief Operations Officer is Ray Kunkel and the Chief People Officer is Mindy Garrison.
Measure of Segment Profit or Loss and Total Assets: The accounting policies of the single reportable segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The CODM evaluates performance and allocates resources based on pre-tax net income/(loss), as presented in the accompanying financial statements. The measure of segment assets is reported on the balance sheet as total consolidated assets.
Significant Segment Expenses
The following significant expenses are regularly reviewed by the CODM for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023: Cost of goods sold $28,407 and $27,589 , respectively; Selling, general, and administrative expenses $53,247 and $75,630 , respectively; Asset impairment $— and $548 , respectively; Change in fair value of financial instruments $615 and $20,039 , respectively; and Depreciation and Amortization $9,979 and $15,160 , respectively.
102
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
Reconciliation to Consolidated Financial Statements
As the Company operates as a single reportable segment, the amounts presented above align directly with the consolidated totals in the financial statements.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
Product Revenue | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Service Revenue | ||||||||||||||
| Total Revenue | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Gross profit % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | ||||||||||||||
| Asset impairment | ||||||||||||||
| Operating loss | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||
| Change in fair value of financial instruments | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | ( | |||||||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||
Other segment information | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation/Amortization | ||||||||||||||
| Total assets | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term liabilities | ||||||||||||||
16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Effective November 2020, the Company issued a secured promissory note, where $1,000 was loaned to one of the Stanley Brothers. The note receivable was secured by equity instruments with certain of the Stanley Brothers, bore interest at 3.25 % per annum, and required the unpaid principal and unpaid interest balances to be paid on or before the maturity date of November 13, 2021, which date was subsequently extended. Effective November 13, 2024, the Company entered into a third amendment of the promissory note to extend the maturity date until November 13, 2029. According to the terms of the agreement, no additional interest will accrue through the payment date. The note has been fully reserved for as of December 31, 2024.
On March 2, 2021, the Company entered into the SBH Purchase Option with Stanley Brothers USA as discussed above (Note 3 "Fair Value Measurement"). The SBH Purchase Option was purchased for total consideration of $8,000 . Certain members of the Stanley Brothers, who are or were employees of the Company at the time, are the majority Shareholders of Stanley Brothers USA.
Effective January 5, 2023, the Company entered into a Brand License and Option Agreement with JMS Brands LLC, an entity owned by one of the Stanley Brothers. Pursuant to the Brand License and Option Agreement, the Company licensed certain intellectual property from JMS Brands LLC, for an annual license fee of $500 . As of January 5, 2024, the Brand License and Option Agreement has expired.
103
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share, per share, per unit, and number of years)
On April 6, 2023, the Company jointly formed an entity, DeFloria, with AJNA and BAT. AJNA is a botanical drug development company. AJNA is partially owned and was co-founded by a member of the Stanley Brothers. BAT holds an equity interest in the entity in the form of 2,000,000 preferred units following its $10 million investment and has the right to participate in future equity issuances to maintain its pro rata equity position. The Company and AJNA each hold 4,000,000 8 % interest bearing note receivable with DeFloria for the sale of lab equipment in the amount of $170 . The principal and interest of the note receivable will be paid in 36 monthly installments. As of December 31, 2024, the remaining note receivable of $71 is presented in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, on February 12, 2024, the Company and DeFloria entered into a separate master services agreement pursuant to which the Company will be compensated for the provision of certain services to DeFloria. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized $648 in revenue and cost of goods sold, respectively, related to the service agreement with DeFloria. The Company has an accounts receivable balance due from DeFloria of $648 as of December 31, 2024.
On June 21, 2024, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Jared Stanley, former executive of the Company, and current member of the Board of Directors. In consideration for Mr. Stanley's services, he will receive a bi-weekly fee of $6 .
104
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act were effective for the period ending December 31, 2024.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, it conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013), management has concluded that the internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the independent registered public accounting firm due to the Company being considered an emerging growth company.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ending December 31, 2024 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
For the year ended December 31, 2024, none of the Company’s directors or officers adopted terminated
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
None.
105
PART III
* * * * * * *
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in the proxy statement for the 2025 annual stockholders' meeting and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain information concerning the Company's executive officers is included in Item 1 of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is hereby incorporated by reference.
* * * * * * *
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in the proxy statement for the 2025 annual stockholders' meeting and is hereby incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
* * * * * * *
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in the proxy statement for the 2025 annual stockholders' meeting and is hereby incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
* * * * * * *
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in the proxy statement for the 2025 annual stockholders' meeting and is hereby incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
* * * * * * *
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in the proxy statement for the 2025 annual stockholders' meeting and is hereby incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
* * * * * * *
106
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules
Documents filed as part of this report
(1) All Financial Statements
The Company's consolidated financial statements are listed in the "Index to Consolidated Financial Statements" under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted, since the required information is not applicable or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-K.
(3) Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
| Exhibit No. | Description | Location | ||||||||||||
| 3.1 | Articles | Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 3.2 | Notice of Articles | Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 4.1∔ | Supplemental Warrant Indenture between Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. and Abacus Health Products, Inc. Odyssey Trust Company dated as of June 11, 2020. | Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 4.2∔ | Warrant Indenture between Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. and Odyssey Trust Company dated as of June 18, 2020. | Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 4.3 | Filed herewith. | |||||||||||||
| 10.1 | Name and Likeness and License Agreement by and between Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company and CWB Holdings, Inc. and Charlotte's Web Holdings Inc. dated August 1, 2018. | Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 10.2 | Amending Agreement dated April 16, 2021 to the Name and Likeness and License Agreement by and between Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company and CWB Holdings, Inc. and Charlotte's Web Holdings Inc. dated August 1, 2018. | Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 10.3∔ | Extension and Second Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement, effective as of July 31, 2022, by and between Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Charlotte’s Web, Inc., and Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2022. | ||||||||||||
107
| Exhibit No. | Description | Location | ||||||||||||
| 10.4∔ | Extension and Third Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement, effective as of August 31, 2022, by and between Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Charlotte’s Web, Inc., and Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 2022. | ||||||||||||
| 10.5∔ | Option Purchase Agreement Among Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. and Stanley Brothers USA Holdings, Inc. dated March 2, 2021. | Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 10.6 | Extension and Fourth Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement, effective as of September 30, 2022, by and between Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Charlotte's Web, Inc., and Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. | Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on October 4, 2022 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.7 | Extension and Fifth Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement, effective as of February 17, 2023, by and between Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Charlotte's Web, Inc., and Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. | Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on February 22, 2023 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.8 | Extension and Sixth Amending Agreement to Name and Likeness and License Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2023, by and between Leeland & Sig LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Charlotte's Web, Inc., and Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. | Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on July 3, 2023 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.9 | Lease of Space made as of May 7, 2019 between EJ 700 Tech Court LLC and Charlotte’s Web, Inc. | Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.10∔ | Sublease made as of May 31, 2019 between Boulder Brands USA, Inc. and Charlotte’s Web, Inc. | Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.11 | First Amendment to Sublease dated as of August 30, 2019 between Boulder Brands USA, Inc. and Charlotte’s Web, Inc. | Exhibit 10.9 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.12 | Sublease made as of May 12, 2021 by and among Charlotte’s Web, Inc. and Outside Interactive, Inc. | Exhibit 10.10 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.13 | Sublease Agreement made as of May 11, 2021 by and between Molson Coors Beverage Company and Charlotte’s Web, Inc. | Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.14 | First Amendment to Sublease Agreement made as of June 15, 2021 by and between Molson Coors Beverage Company and Charlotte’s Web, Inc. | Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
108
| Exhibit No. | Description | Location | ||||||||||||
10.15† | CWB Holdings, Inc. 2015 Stock Option Plan dated as February 2, 2016. | Exhibit 10.13 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.16† | CWB Holdings, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to 2015 Stock Option Plan. | Exhibit 99.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-262006) filed with the SEC on January 5, 2022 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.17† | Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan dated August 23, 2018. | Exhibit 10.14 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.18† | Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. Amended 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan dated April 29, 2021. | Exhibit 10.15 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 10.18.1† | Amendment No. 1 to Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. Amended 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan dated April 29, 2021. | Filed herewith. | ||||||||||||
10.19† | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees to the 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan. | Exhibit 10.16 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.20† | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees to the 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2021 amendment) | Exhibit 10.16.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.21† | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors to the 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan. | Exhibit 10.17 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.22† | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors to the 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (2021 amendment). | Exhibit 10.17.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on January 25, 2022 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.23† | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award to the 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan. | Exhibit 10.18 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.24† | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award to the 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2021 amendment). | Exhibit 10.18.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.25† | Form of Director’s Service Agreement, with Form of Director’s Indemnification Agreement. | Exhibit 10.28 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.26∔ | Consulting Agreement dated April 16, 2021, by and between Leeland & Sig, LLC d/b/a Stanley Brothers Brand Company, the Stanley Brothers, and Charlotte's Web Inc. | Exhibit 10.29 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.27∔, ++ | Brand License and Option Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2023 by and between JMS Brands LLC, and Charlotte’s Web, Inc. | Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on March 23, 2023 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.28† | Letter dated as of March 30, 2023 to Jessica Saxton re: Amendment to Offer of Employment with Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on April 3, 2023 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
109
| Exhibit No. | Description | Location | ||||||||||||
10.28.1† | Letter dated as of March 19, 2024 to Jessica Saxton re: Amendment to Offer of Employment with Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Filed herewith. | ||||||||||||
10.29† | Offer Letter from Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. to William Morachnick, dated September 12, 2023. | Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on September 13, 2023 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.30++ | Manufacturing and Sales License Agreement, effective November 1, 2022 by and among Aphria, Inc. and Charlotte’s Web, Inc. | Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2022. | ||||||||||||
10.31∔, ++ | Subscription Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2022, by and among MLB Advanced Media, L.P. and Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on March 23, 2023 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.32++ | Promotional Rights Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2022, by and among MLB Advanced Media L.P., on its own behalf and on behalf of Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, The MLB Network, LLC and the Major League Baseball Clubs and Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on March 23, 2023 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
| 10.32.1++ | First Amendment to Promotional Rights Agreement, executed February 5, 2024, by and among MLB Advanced Media L.P., on its own behalf and on behalf of Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, The MLB Network, LLC and the Major League Baseball Clubs and Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||
10.33∔, ++ | Subscription Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2022, by and among BT DE Investments, Inc. and Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-56364) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2022. | ||||||||||||
10.34∔, ++ | Convertible Debenture, dated as of November 14, 2022, by and among BT DE Investments, Inc. and Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. | Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-56364) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2022. | ||||||||||||
10.35∔, ++ | Investor Rights Agreement, dated November 14, 2022, by and between Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. and BT DE Investments, Inc. a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAT Group. | Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File No. 000-56364) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2022. | ||||||||||||
10.36 | Secured Promissory Note between Jesse Stanley and the Master and a Hound Revocable Trust, as borrower, and Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc., as Lender, dated November 13, 2020. | Exhibit 10.30 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2021 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.37 | Amendment to Secured Promissory Note between Jesse Stanley and the Master and a Hound Revocable Trust and Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. dated March 22, 2022. | Exhibit 10.36 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on March 24, 2022 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
10.38 | Third Amendment to Secured Promissory Note, dated November 13, 2024 | Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-56364) filed with the SEC on March 21, 2024 is incorporated herein by reference. | ||||||||||||
19.1 | Filed herewith | |||||||||||||
| 21.1 | Filed herewith | |||||||||||||
23.1 | Filed herewith | |||||||||||||
110
| Exhibit No. | Description | Location | ||||||||||||
23.2 | Filed herewith | |||||||||||||
31.1 | Filed herewith | |||||||||||||
31.2 | Filed herewith | |||||||||||||
32.1* | Furnished herewith | |||||||||||||
32.2* | Furnished herewith | |||||||||||||
97.1 | Filed herewith | |||||||||||||
| 101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||
| 101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||
| 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||
| 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||
| 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||
| 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||
| † | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. | |||||||||||||
| ∔ | Certain identified information has been excluded from the exhibit pursuant to Item 601(a)(6) and/or Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K. | |||||||||||||
| ++ | Exhibits, schedules and annexes have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K and will be supplementally provided to the SEC upon request. | |||||||||||||
| * | Document has been furnished, is not deemed filed and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing. | |||||||||||||
* * * * * * *
111
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
* * * * * * *
112
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| CHARLOTTE'S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. | ||||||||
| March 19, 2025 | By: | /s/ Erika Lind | ||||||
| (Date) | Erika Lind | |||||||
| (Chief Financial Officer) | ||||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signatures | Title | Date | ||||||||||||
| /s/ William Morachnick | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | March 19, 2025 | ||||||||||||
William Morachnick | ||||||||||||||
/s/ Erika Lind | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | March 19, 2025 | ||||||||||||
Erika Lind | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Angela McElwee | Director | March 19, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Angela McElwee | ||||||||||||||
/s/ Jared Stanley | Director | March 19, 2025 | ||||||||||||
Jared Stanley | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Jonathan Atwood | Director | March 19, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Jonathan Atwood | ||||||||||||||
/s/ Matthew McCarthy | Director | March 19, 2025 | ||||||||||||
Matthew McCarthy | ||||||||||||||
/s/ Maureen Usifer | Director | March 19, 2025 | ||||||||||||
Maureen Usifer | ||||||||||||||
113
Exhibit 4.3
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a description of the common shares of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. (the "Company", "we" "our" or "us") based on the terms and provisions of the Company’s notice of articles and articles, as amended (the "Articles"), which are included as Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 to our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (this "Form 10-K"). The following description may not be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the terms and provisions of the Articles. We encourage you to read our Articles and applicable provisions of Canadian law for additional information. Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined in this exhibit, have the meanings ascribed to them in the Form 10-K to clarify.
General
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares, of which there are 158,009,541 Common Shares outstanding as of March 17, 2025. The Company’s authorized share capital consists of the Common Shares, as well as an unlimited number of Proportionate Voting Shares, none of which were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2024, and an unlimited number of preferred shares, issuable in series, none of which were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2024. Holders of Proportionate Voting Shares are entitled to 400 votes per Proportionate Voting Share and holders of Common Shares are entitled to one vote per Common Share on all matters upon which holders of shares are entitled to vote. On November 3, 2021, all Proportionate Voting Shares converted into Common Shares by way of mandatory conversion in accordance with the Articles. Following the conversion of all Proportionate Voting Shares into Common Shares, no further Proportionate Voting Shares may be issued by the Company.
Each holder of a Common Share is entitled to: (i) one vote at all meetings of Shareholders; (ii) a pro rata share of any dividends or other distributions declared payable by the Board; and (iii) a pro rata share of any distribution of the Issuer’s assets on any winding up or dissolution of the Issuer. Other than as disclosed herein, there are no pre-emptive rights; conversion or exchange rights; redemption, retraction, purchase for cancellation or surrender provisions; sinking or purchase fund provisions; provisions permitting or restricting the issuance of additional securities; or any other material restrictions or provisions requiring a security holder to contribute additional capital, which are applicable to the Company's Common Shares.
Effective as of November 14, 2022, the Company entered into a subscription agreement (the "Subscription Agreement") with BT DE Investments, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAT Group (LSE: BATS and NYSE: BTI), providing for the issuance of an approximately $56.8 million ("Canadian Dollar" C$75.3 million) convertible debenture (the "debenture") convertible into 19.9% ownership of the Company’s Common Shares at a conversion price of C$2.00 per Common Share of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX"). The debenture will accrue interest at a stated annualized rate of 5% until such time that there is federal regulation permitting the use of cannabidiol, a phytocannabinoid derived from the plant Cannabis sativa L. ("CBD") as an ingredient in food products and dietary supplements in the United States. Following federal regulation of CBD, the stated annualized rate of interest shall reduce to 1.5%. The maturity date for the debenture is November 2029. Concurrently with the issuance of the debenture, the Company and BT DE Investments, Inc. entered into an investor rights agreement.
Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar of the Company's Common Shares is Odyssey Trust Company located at 350 - 409 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 1T2, Canada.
Voting Rights
All holders of Common Shares will be entitled to receive notice of any meeting of Shareholders of the Company, and to attend, vote and speak at such meetings, except those meetings at which only holders of a specific
class of shares, other than the Common Shares, are entitled to vote separately as a class under the BCBCA. A quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of Shareholders is present if two Shareholders who, together, hold not fewer than 25% of the votes attaching to the outstanding voting shares entitled to vote at the meeting, are present in person or represented by proxy.
On all matters upon which holders of Common Shares are entitled to vote, each Common Share is entitled to one vote per Common Share.
Our director, Mr. Jonathan Atwood, was appointed as the designee to the board of directors by BT DE Investments, Inc., pursuant to the investor rights agreement between the Company and BT DE Investments, Inc., dated November 14, 2022. The investor rights agreement was entered into by the Company and BT DE Investments, Inc. in connection with the Company’s issuance of the $56.8 million debenture to BT DE Investments, Inc. on the terms of the subscription agreement, dated November 14, 2022 by and among the Company and BT DE Investments, Inc. The investor rights agreement provides BT DE Investments, Inc. with certain rights, including the right to nominate 20% of the members of the Company’s board of directors for so long as BT DE Investments, Inc. and its affiliates’ partially diluted ownership of the Company’s common shares is at least 15% (with a stepdown in its nomination rights to 10% of the members of the board of directors). BT DE Investments, Inc. nomination rights terminate upon its and its affiliates’ partially diluted ownership of the Company’s common shares declining below 10% for, subject to certain exceptions in the investor rights agreement, a 30 day period.
Dividend Rights
Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive dividends out of the assets available for the payment or distribution of dividends at such times and in such amount and form as the Company’s Board may from time to time determine, subject to any preferential rights of the holders of any outstanding preferred shares. The Company is permitted to pay dividends unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that: (i) the Company is insolvent; or (ii) the payment of the dividend would render the Company insolvent.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company or any other distribution of its assets among its Shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, the holders of Common Shares will be entitled to receive all of the Company’s assets remaining after payment of all debts and other liabilities, subject to any preferential rights of the holders of any outstanding preferred shares.
Pre-emptive and Redemption Rights
Holders of Common Shares will not have any pre-emptive or redemption rights.
Certain Amendments
In addition to any other voting right or power to which the holders of Common Shares shall be entitled by law or regulation or other provisions of the Articles from time to time in effect, but subject to the provisions of the Articles, holders of Common Shares shall each be entitled to vote separately as a class, in addition to any other vote of Shareholders that may be required, in respect of any alteration, repeal or amendment of the Company’s Articles which would adversely affect the rights or special rights of the holders of Common Shares.
The rights, privileges, conditions and restrictions attaching to the Common Shares may be modified if the amendment is authorized by not less than 66 2/3% of the votes cast at a meeting of holders of Common Shares duly held for that purpose.
Forum Selection
The Company’s Articles include a forum selection provision that provides that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, British Columbia courts shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for:
•any derivative action or proceeding brought by any person on behalf of the Company;
•any action or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed to the Company by any director, officer or other employee of the Company;
•any action or proceeding asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Business Corporations Act or the Company’s Articles (as either may be amended from time to time); and
•Any action or proceeding asserting a claim otherwise related to the relationships among the Company, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers or any of them, but excluding claims relating to the business carried on by the Company or such affiliates.
As written, the forum selection provision is intended to apply to any of above classes of actions. The forum selection provision also provides that shareholders are deemed to have consented to personal jurisdiction in the Province of British Columbia and to service of process on their counsel in any foreign action initiated in violation of the foregoing provisions.
The forum selection provision may impose additional litigation costs on shareholders in pursuing any such claims. It is uncertain whether such provision would apply to actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws, and if it does, whether British Columbia courts would enforce such provision given that neither the Company nor its investors can waive compliance with U.S. federal securities laws. It also remains uncertain as to whether a breach of U.S. securities law in and of itself would give rise to a direct cause of action in British Columbia courts, although indirect causes of action may arise thereunder as a result of, without limitation, breach or misrepresentation. The forum selection provision is not explicitly intended to apply to, nor is it specifically directed at, actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws. However, the provision does not explicitly state that actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws are excluded from the application of the provision. In the event it was determined that the forum selection provision applies to actions arising under U.S. federal securities laws, or if British Columbia courts refused to enforce such provisions, or if a breach of U.S. securities law did not give rise to a cause of action in British Columbia courts, there is a risk that the Company would be required to litigate any such breach in a jurisdiction which is less favorable to the Company, which could result in additional costs and financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
These provisions may limit the Company’s shareholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum they find favorable for disputes with the Company or its directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against the Company and its directors, officers, and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in the Company’s Articles to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, the Company may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm its business, operating results and financial condition.
Public Benefit Company Status
In August 2019, at the annual general and special meeting of the Shareholders of the Company's voting shares, the Company’s Shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Notice of Articles and Articles to allow the Company to become a benefit company under the BCBCA, as a demonstration of its long-term commitment to conducting its business in a responsible and sustainable manner and promoting one or more public benefits. The Company became a benefit company under the BCBCA on July 24, 2020.
Benefit companies are corporations in British Columbia that are formally and legally empowered to conduct their business in a responsible and sustainable manner and promote one or more public benefits. Under British Columbia law, benefit companies are required to identify in their Articles the public benefit or benefits they will promote. Their directors have a duty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to conducting business in a responsible and sustainable manner and to promote the company’s public benefits and must balance this duty with
their general fiduciary duties under section 142(1)(a) of the BCBCA to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company. As a benefit company, the Company must balance a variety of interests that may result in actions that do not maximize shareholder value as the Board must balance the interests of shareholders and stakeholders in working to achieve the Company’s public benefits.
In practice, the Board of Directors of the Company takes an expanded view of decision making to balance their fiduciary duties and their duty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to conducting business in a responsible and sustainable manner and to promote the Company’s public benefits, including weighing potential conflicts of interest and ultimately making decisions that the Board believes most appropriately address all of the Board’s duties. British Columbia courts have generally been deferential to the business decisions of directors, as directors are in the best position to take into account the diverse interests of a company and its stakeholders (including what weight to give to shareholder interests), as long as the business decision lies within the range of reasonable alternatives.
As a British Columbia benefit company, the Company’s Shareholders (if they, individually or collectively, own at least 2% of the Company’s outstanding capital stock or shares having at least C$2 million in market value (whichever is less)) are entitled to commence a legal proceeding claiming that the Company’s directors failed to balance Shareholder and public benefit interests, although the BCBCA clarifies that despite any rule of law to the contrary, a court may not order monetary damages in relation to any breach by the Company’s directors of these additional duties. This potential liability does not exist for traditional corporations.
Benefit companies also are required under the BCBCA to publish on their websites and provide to their shareholders an annual benefit report that assesses, against a selected third-party standard, their performance, in carrying out the commitments set out in the benefit company’s benefit provisions. The Company’s annual benefit report discloses, in relation to the most recently completed fiscal year, (a) a fair and accurate description of the ways it demonstrated commitment to conducting its business in a responsible and sustainable manner, and to promoting the public benefits specified in its Articles; (b) a record of assessment based on a third-party standard; and (c) the circumstances, if any, that hindered the Company’s endeavors to carry out the commitments set out in the Company’s benefit provision. For so long as the Company is a benefit company under the BCBCA, the Company will include an annual benefit report as part of its annual proxy materials sent to its Shareholders and post the report to its website.
For the Company’s most recent benefit report relating to the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company selected B Lab as the third-party standard against which to measure its performance. B Lab conducted a B Impact Assessment of the Company. The B Impact Assessment is an assessment of a company’s governance and its impact on its workers, customers, community, and environment. The B Impact Assessment of the Company is posted on the B Lab website and was included in the Company’s benefit report in respect of the year ended December 31, 2023.
The Company’s public benefit, as provided in its Articles, is "to pioneer the way to healthier lives, stronger communities, and a more bountiful planet by making it easier for everyone to access the natural restorative power of plants." Accordingly, this social focus includes contributing to non-profit organizations and charities, which are made on an ad hoc basis, concentrating first on those entities that have historically supported the business through education of existing and potential customers. The Company also supports non-profits that it believes can utilize the wellness aspects of its products (i.e., military veterans, adaptive athletes, educational organizations, etc.). By doing so, the Company believes that socially oriented actions will ultimately have a positive impact on the Company, its employees, and its Shareholders. The Company’s stated mission is to “unleash the healing power of botanicals with compassion and science benefitting the planet and all who live upon it.” Becoming a benefit company underscores the Company’s commitment to its purpose and its Shareholders.
In addition to being a benefit company, the Company is a "Certified B Corp", as certified by B Lab, the US non-profit organization which administers this certification . Certified B Corps (also referred to as B Corps) are for-profit companies that use the power of business to build a more inclusive and sustainable economy. Certified B Corps are required to consider the impact of their decisions on all stakeholders: customers, workers, communities, and the environment. These requirements are aligned with the Company’s socially conscious founding principles,
and formalizes its commitment to environmental, social, and governance issues for stakeholders. The Company’s status as a Certified B Corp is distinct from and has no impact on its status as a benefit company under the BCBCA. Though the Company has chosen to use B Lab’s criteria for its required annual impact assessment under the BCBCA, the Company is not required to do so and could select another criteria if it desired.
Provisions of British Columbia Law Governing Business Combinations
All provinces of Canada have adopted National Instrument 62-104 - Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids and related forms to harmonize and consolidate take-over bid and issuer bid regimes nationally (“NI 62-104”). The Canadian Securities Administrators, or CSA, have also issued National Policy 62-203 - Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids (the “National Policy”), which contains regulatory guidance on the interpretation and application of NI 62-104 and on the conduct of parties involved in a bid. The National Policy and NI 62-104 are collectively referred to as the “Bid Regime”. The National Policy does not have the force of law, but is an indication by the CSA of what the intentions and desires of the regulators are in the areas covered by their policies. Unlike some regimes where the take-over bid rules are primarily policy-driven, in Canada, the regulatory framework for take-over bids is primarily rules-based, which rules are supported by policy.
A “take-over bid” or “bid” is an offer to acquire outstanding voting or equity securities of a class made to any person who is in Canada or to any securityholder of an offeree issuer whose last address as shown on the books of a target is in Canada, where the securities subject to the offer to acquire, together with the securities “beneficially owned” by the offeror, or any other person acting jointly or in concert with the offeror, constitute in the aggregate 20% or more of the outstanding securities of that class of securities at the date of the offer to acquire. For the purposes of the Bid Regime, a security is deemed to be “beneficially owned” by an offeror as of a specific date if the offeror is the beneficial owner of a security convertible into the security within 60 days following that date, or has a right or obligation permitting or requiring the offeror, whether or not on conditions, to acquire beneficial ownership of the security within 60 days by a single transaction or a series of linked transactions. Offerors are also subject to early warning requirements, where an offeror who acquires “beneficial ownership of”, or control or direction over, voting or equity securities of any class of a reporting issuer or securities convertible into, voting or equity securities of any class of a target that, together with the offeror’s securities, would constitute 10% or more of the outstanding securities of that class must promptly publicly issue and file a news release containing certain prescribed information, and, within two business days, file an early warning report containing substantially the same information as is contained in the news release.
In addition, where an offeror is required to file an early warning report or a further report as described and the offeror acquires or disposes of beneficial ownership of, or the power to exercise control or direction over, an additional 2% or more of the outstanding securities of the class, or disposes of beneficial ownership of outstanding securities of the class below 10%, the offeror must issue an additional press release and file a new early warning report. During the period commencing on the occurrence of an event in respect of which an early warning report is required and terminating on the expiry of one business day from the date that the early warning report is filed, the offeror may not acquire or offer to acquire beneficial ownership of any securities of the class in respect of which the early warning report was required to be filed or any securities convertible into securities of that class. This restriction does not apply to an offeror that has beneficial ownership of, or control or direction over, securities that constitute 20% of more of the outstanding securities of the class.
Related party transactions, issuer bids and insider bids are subject to additional regulation that may differ depending on the particular jurisdiction of Canada in which it occurs.
Advance Notice Provisions
Pursuant to Article 29 in the Company’s Articles relating to the advance notice of nominations of directors, which we refer to as the Advance Notice Provisions, Shareholders seeking to nominate candidates for election as directors other than pursuant to a proposal or requisition of Shareholders made in accordance with the provisions of the BCBCA, must provide timely written notice to the Company’s Secretary. To be timely, a Shareholder’s notice must be received (i) in the case of an annual general meeting of shareholders, not less than 30 days prior to the date
of the annual general meeting of shareholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting of shareholders is to be held on a date that is less than 50 days after the date on which the first public announcement of the date of the annual meeting was made, notice by the shareholder must be received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the date of such public announcement; and (ii) in the case of any other general meeting of shareholders called for the purpose of electing directors (whether or not also called for other purposes), not later than the 15th day following the day on which the first public announcement of the date of the general meeting of shareholders was made; and (iii) if notice-and-access (as defined in National Instrument 54-101 – Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer) is used for delivery of proxy related materials in respect of a meeting described in (i) or (ii) above, and the notice date in respect of the meeting is not fewer than 50 days prior to the date of the applicable meeting, the notice must be received not later than the close of business on the 40th day before the applicable meeting. The Advance Notice Provisions also prescribes the proper written form for a shareholder’s notice.
In addition to satisfying the requirements of the Advance Notice Provisions in the company’s Articles, in order to comply with universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s must also provide notice that sets forth the information required in and meets the advance notice requirements of Rule 14a-19 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In order to comply with the universal proxy rules under the Exchange Act, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than 60 days before the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting (as well as comply with the Advance Notice Provisions of our Articles).
Impediments to Change of Control
The Company’s Articles do not contain any change of control limitations with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring that involves us.
The material investment by BT DE Investments, Inc. in the debenture and the resulting significant ownership interest in the Company may have the effect of delaying or preventing change of control transactions, including transactions that some or all of our shareholders might consider to be desirable.
Ownership and Exchange Controls
Limitations on the ability to acquire and hold our shares may be imposed by the Competition Act (Canada). This legislation establishes a pre-merger notification regime for certain types of merger transactions that exceed certain statutory shareholding and financial thresholds. Transactions that are subject to notification cannot be closed until the required materials are filed and the applicable statutory waiting period has expired or been waived by the Commissioner of Competition, or the Commissioner. Further, the Competition Act (Canada) permits the Commissioner to review any acquisition of control over or of a significant interest in the Company, whether or not it is subject to mandatory notification. This legislation grants the Commissioner jurisdiction, for up to one year, to challenge this type of acquisition before the Canadian Competition Tribunal if it would, or would be likely to, substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in Canada.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
The Company is subject to the provisions of Part 5, Division 5 of the BCBCA. Under Section 160 of the BCBCA, the Company may, subject to Section 163 of the BCBCA:
(a)indemnify an individual who:
(i)is or was a director or officer of the Company;
(ii)is or was a director or officer of another corporation at a time when such corporation is or was an affiliate of the Company; or
(iii)at the Company’s request, is or was, or holds or held a position equivalent to that of, a director or officer of a partnership, trust, joint venture or other unincorporated entity, including, subject to certain limited exceptions, the heirs and personal or other legal representatives of that individual (collectively, an “eligible party”), against all eligible penalties, defined below, to which the eligible party is or may be liable; and
(b)after final disposition of an eligible proceeding, pay the expenses actually and reasonably incurred by an eligible party in respect of that proceeding, where:
(i)“eligible penalty” means a judgment, penalty or fine awarded or imposed in, or an amount paid in settlement of, an eligible proceeding,
(ii)“eligible proceeding” means a proceeding in which an eligible party or any of the heirs and personal or other legal representatives of the eligible party, by reason of the eligible party being or having been a director or officer of, or holding or having held a position equivalent to that of a director or officer of, the Company or an associated corporation (A) is or may be joined as a party, or (B) is or may be liable for or in respect of a judgment, penalty or fine in, or expenses related to, the proceeding,
(iii)“expenses” includes costs, charges and expenses, including legal and other fees, but does not include judgments, penalties, fines or amounts paid in settlement of a proceeding, and
(iv)“proceeding” includes any legal proceeding or investigative action, whether current, threatened, pending or completed.
Under Section 161 of the BCBCA, and subject to Section 163 of the BCBCA, the Company must, after the final disposition of an eligible proceeding, pay the expenses actually and reasonably incurred by an eligible party in respect of that proceeding if the eligible party (a) has not been reimbursed for those expenses and (b) is wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the outcome of the proceeding or is substantially successful on the merits in the outcome of the proceeding.
Under Section 162 of the BCBCA, and subject to Section 163 of the BCBCA, the Company may pay, as they are incurred in advance of the final disposition of an eligible proceeding, the expenses actually and reasonably incurred by an eligible party in respect of the proceeding, provided that the Company must not make such payments unless it first receives from the eligible party a written undertaking that, if it is ultimately determined that the payment of expenses is prohibited under Section 163 of the BCBCA, the eligible party will repay the amounts advanced.
Under Section 163 of the BCBCA, the Company must not indemnify an eligible party against eligible penalties to which the eligible party is or may be liable or pay the expenses of an eligible party in respect of that proceeding under Sections 160(b), 161 or 162 of the BCBCA, as the case may be, if any of the following circumstances apply:
(a)if the indemnity or payment is made under an agreement to indemnify or pay expenses and, at the time that the agreement to indemnify or pay expenses was made, the Company was prohibited from giving the indemnity or paying the expenses by the Company’s memorandum or Articles;
(b)if the indemnity or payment is made otherwise than under an earlier agreement to indemnify or pay expenses and, at the time that the indemnity or payment is made, the Company is prohibited from giving the indemnity or paying the expenses by the Company’s memorandum or Articles;
(c)if, in relation to the subject matter of the eligible proceeding, the eligible party did not act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company or the associated corporation, as the case may be; or
(d)in the case of an eligible proceeding other than a civil proceeding, if the eligible party did not have reasonable grounds for believing that the eligible party’s conduct in respect of which the proceeding was brought was lawful.
If an eligible proceeding is brought against an eligible party by or on behalf of the Company or by or on behalf of an associated corporation, the Company must not either indemnify the eligible party under Section 160(a) of the BCBCA against eligible penalties to which the eligible party is or may be liable, or pay the expenses of the eligible party under Sections 160(b), 161 or 162 of the BCBCA, as the case may be, in respect of the proceeding.
Under Section 164 of the BCBCA, and despite any other provision of Part 5, Division 5 of the BCBCA and whether or not payment of expenses or indemnification has been sought, authorized or declined under Part 5, Division 5 of the BCBCA, on application of the Company or an eligible party, the court may do one or more of the following:
(a)order the Company to indemnify an eligible party against any liability incurred by the eligible party in respect of an eligible proceeding;
(b)order the Company to pay some or all of the expenses incurred by an eligible party in respect of an eligible proceeding;
(c)order the enforcement of, or any payment under, an agreement of indemnification entered into by us;
(d)order the Company to pay some or all of the expenses actually and reasonably incurred by any person in obtaining an order under Section 165 of the BCBCA; or
(e)make any other order the court considers appropriate.
Section 165 of the BCBCA provides that the Company may purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of an eligible party or the heirs and personal or other legal representatives of the eligible party against any liability that may be incurred by reason of the eligible party being or having been a director or officer of, or holding or having held a position equivalent to that of a director or officer of, the Company or an associated corporation.
Under Article 20.2 of the Company’s Articles, and subject to the BCBCA, the Company must indemnify an eligible party and his or her heirs and legal personal representatives against all eligible penalties to which such person is or may be liable, and it must, after the final disposition of an eligible proceeding, pay the expenses actually and reasonably incurred by such person in respect of that proceeding. Each eligible party is deemed to have contracted with the Company on the terms of the indemnity contained in the Company’s Articles.
Under Article 20.3 of the Company’s Articles, and subject to any restrictions in the BCBCA, the Company may indemnify any person. The Company has entered into indemnity agreements or employment agreements containing indemnification provisions with certain of the Company’s directors and officers. Under these indemnification provisions, an executive officer is entitled, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, to the right of indemnification by the Company for certain expenses to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. The Company believes that these indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as directors and executive officers.
Pursuant to Article 20.4 of the Company’s Articles, the failure of an eligible party to comply with the BCBCA or the Company’s Articles does not invalidate any indemnity to which he or she is entitled under the Company’s Articles.
Under Article 20.5 of the Company’s Articles, the Company may purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any person (or his or her heirs or legal personal representatives) who: (1) is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company; (2) at the request of the Company, is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation at a time when the corporation is or was an affiliate of the Company; (3) at the request of the Company, is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation or a partnership, trust, joint venture or other unincorporated entity; (d) at the request of the Company, holds or held a position equivalent to that of a director or officer of a partnership, trust, joint venture or other unincorporated entity; against any liability incurred by him or her as such director, officer, employee or agent or person who holds or held such equivalent position.
Company has an insurance policy covering its directors and officers, within the limits and subject to the limitations of the policy, with respect to certain liabilities arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers.
Exhibit 19.1
INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY | ||
OCTOBER 3, 2018
Revised November 2, 2021, and November 13, 2023
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
The purpose of the Insider Trading and Reporting Policy (the “Policy”) is to summarize the insider trading restrictions to which directors, officers and employees are subject under applicable securities legislation, and to set forth a policy governing investments in the securities of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and the reporting thereof which is consistent with the applicable legislation.
This Policy is not intended to discourage investment in the Company’s securities. Rather, it is intended to highlight the obligations and the restrictions imposed on insiders by relevant securities legislation.
1.Summary of Legislation
Securities legislation prohibits any person in a “special relationship” with or with a duty of trust and confidence to the Company from either:
(a)purchasing or selling the Company’s securities with the knowledge of a material fact or material change concerning the Company that has not been generally disclosed; or
(b)informing (or “tipping”), other than when necessary, in the course of business, another person or company of a material fact or material change concerning the Company before the material fact or material change has been generally disclosed.
(c)A material change to the business or affairs of the Company or a material fact is one which would reasonably be expected to have (i) a significant influence on a reasonable investor’s decision to buy, hold, sell or otherwise trade the Company’s securities or (ii) an effect on the market price or value of any securities of a public issuer. Both positive and negative information may be material. A material change is specifically defined to include any decision by a board of directors to implement a material change, as well as any decision made to implement such a change by senior management, if board of director approval is probable.
This prohibition applies to persons who are deemed to have a “special relationship” with the Company, which include:
(a)directors, officers, employees, consultants and contractors of the Company; and
(b)persons or corporations who learn of a material fact or material change concerning the Company.
While the penalties for a breach of this prohibition vary among jurisdictions, a breach may render you personally liable to prosecution and, upon conviction, to a fine not exceeding CAD$5,000,000 or five years in jail, or both. Further, you may be subject to civil actions at the instance of all or any of security holders, the companies whose securities were traded, and regulators. In the U.S., you may be subject to (i) a civil penalty of up to three times the profit gained, or loss avoided; (ii) a criminal fine (no matter how small the profit) of up to US$5,000,000; and (iii) up to twenty years in prison for engaging in transactions in Company securities at a time when you have knowledge of material nonpublic information regarding the Company.
You should note that any person who is associated with you, including any member of your family, your spouse or any person living with you, is also deemed to be a person in a special relationship with the Company, and is subject to the same legal obligations and duties.
1
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. | INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY | ||||
2.Trading Prohibitions
In light of the foregoing, all directors, officers, employees will be subject to the following prohibitions relating to purchases, sales, or other trades in the Company’s securities and securities of other public issuers:
(a)If one has knowledge of a material fact or material change related to the affairs of the Company or any public issuer involved in a transaction with the Company which is not generally known, no purchase, sale or trade may be made (nor may any recommendations or advice be made to purchase, sell or trade) until the information has been generally disclosed to the public and the blackout periods set forth below have expired;
(b)Knowledge of a material fact or material change must not be conveyed to any other person other than in the necessary course of business until the information has been generally disclosed to the public and the blackout periods set forth below have expired;
(c)Any hedging activities, including the practice of selling “short” securities of the Company at any time, are not permitted;
(d)The practice of buying or selling financial instruments, including a “call” or “put” or any other prepaid forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, units of exchange funds or derivative security in respect of any securities of the Company is not permitted; and
(e)Trading is prohibited in the event that the Company has provided notice of a pending material fact or material change until the information has been generally disclosed to the public and the blackout periods set forth below have expired.
For purposes of this Policy, public issuer includes any issuer, whether the Company or otherwise, whose securities are traded in a public market, whether on a stock exchange or “over the counter” and the term “trade” includes any transaction in Company securities and securities of other public issuers, including gifts and pledges.
The above prohibitions and the insider reporting obligations provided below apply equally to the trading or exercising of options to acquire shares or other securities of the public issuer.
Notwithstanding the above prohibitions in subsection 2(c) but subject to any other applicable sections of this Policy and any other applicable policies of the Company, the Company’s directors, officers, and employees will be able to sell a security which such person does not own if such person owns another security convertible into the security sold or an option or right to acquire the security sold and, within 10 days after the sale, such person: (i) exercises the conversion privilege, option or right and delivers the security so associated to the purchaser; or (ii) transfers the convertible security, option or right, if transferable, to the purchaser. The Company requires that anyone subject to this Policy provide advance written notice to the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel of such activity at least two days prior to such activity.
This Policy continues to apply to the Company’s directors, officers and employees following termination of employment or other relationship with the Company until after the second trading day that any material non-public information in your possession has become public or is no longer material. Each employee, officer, consultant and director is personally responsible for the actions of their family members and other persons with whom they have a relationship who are subject to this Policy, including any pre-clearances required.
2
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. | INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY | ||||
3.Insider Reporting Obligations
A person or corporation who becomes a “reporting insider” of the Company must file insider reports in Canada and the U.S. within 10 calendar days of the date of becoming a “reporting insider”. Furthermore, securities legislation requires reporting insiders to prepare and file a report of nearly every trade they make in securities of the Company. This includes the granting and exercise of stock options or any other rights to acquire securities. Under securities legislation, reporting insiders are personally responsible for ensuring that insider reports are filed within five (5) calendar days of the trade in Canada and within two (2) business days of the trade in the U.S. Assistance with filing these reports on the SEDI and EDGAR websites may be obtained from the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel. In order to allow the Company to comply with its reporting obligations, reporting insiders must also advise the Company immediately of any trade in securities of the Company even after pre-clearing such trades in accordance with this Policy. In addition, a reporting insider whose direct or indirect beneficial ownership of or control or direction over securities of the Company changes, must file an insider report of the change within five (5) calendar days of the date of the change in Canada and within two (2) business days of the date of the change in the U.S.
In Canada, National Instrument 55-104 - Insider Reporting Requirements and Exemptions (“NI 55-104”) defines a “reporting insider” to include, among others, an insider of the issuer if the insider is:
(a)the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer and each director of the issuer, of a significant shareholder of the issuer or of a major subsidiary of the issuer;
(b)a person or corporation responsible for a principal business unit, division or function of the issuer;
(c)a significant shareholder of the issuer; and
(d)any other insider that in the ordinary course of business receives or has access to information as to material facts or material changes concerning the issuer before the material facts or material changes are generally disclosed and directly or indirectly, exercises, or has the ability to exercise, significant power or influence over the business, operations, capital or development of the issuer.
In the U.S., a “Section 16 officer” required to file insider reports is defined in Rule 16a-1 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a U.S. reporting company’s president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer (or, if there is no such accounting officer, the controller), any vice-president of the company in charge of a principal business unit, division or function (such as sales, administration or finance), any other officer who performs a policy-making function, or any other person who performs similar policy-making functions for the issuer. Officers of the company’s subsidiaries can be deemed officers of the company if they perform such policy-making functions for the issuer.
It is each insider’s personal responsibility to determine if they are a “reporting insider” as defined in NI 55-104 or “Section 16 officer” as defined in 16a-1, and they should review the complete definition of such terms in making such determination. It is each reporting insider’s responsibility to ensure that all requisite insider trading reports are filed with the appropriate securities commissions within the statutory time limits.
Copies of the insider reports may be obtained from the Company and are required to be filed electronically on SEDI and EDGAR.
3
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. | INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY | ||||
4.Insider Trading Compliance Oversight.
5.The Company’s Chief Financial Officer/and or General Counsel shall oversee compliance with this Policy provided, however, that if the Chief Financial Officer is a party to a proposed trade, transaction or inquiry relating to this Policy, the Company’s General Counsel shall oversee compliance with respect to such proposed trade, transaction or inquiry and vice versa. The Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel may delegate his or her authority to oversee compliance with this Policy as he or she deem necessary or appropriate in his or her sole discretion. The duties and powers of the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel and his or her delegees may include the following:
1.Administering, monitoring and enforcing compliance with this Policy.
2.Responding to all inquiries related to this Policy
3.Designating and announcing special trading blackout periods during which specified persons may trade in Company securities.
4.Providing copies of this Policy and other appropriate materials to all current and new directors, officers and employees, and such other persons as the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel determines have access to material nonpublic information concerning the Company.
5.Administering, monitoring and enforcing compliance with Canadian and U.S. federal and state insider trading laws and regulations.
6.Assisting in the preparation and filing of all required SEC reports filed by Section 16 Insiders relating to their trading in Company securities, including Forms 3, 4, 5 and 144 and Schedules 13D and 13G.
7.Maintaining as Company records originals or copies of all documents required by the provisions of this Policy, and copies of all required Canadian and U.S. insider reports relating to insider trading,
8.Designing and requiring training about the obligations of this Policy as the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel considers appropriate.
9.The Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel may designate one or more individuals who may perform their duties under this Policy in the event that a Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel is unable or unavailable to perform such duties.
10.Additional Restrictions for Directors, Officers and Employees
11.Blackout Periods
No trades or other transactions in securities of the Company (including the exercise of stock options or transactions involving other forms of equity-based compensation) shall be carried out by:
(a)directors of the Company;
(b)officers of the Company; and
4
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. | INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY | ||||
(c)any employees of the Company,
at any time, except during the 30-calendar day period beginning on the morning of the third business day following the date the quarterly or annual financial results have been disclosed by the Company by way of a news release.
Trading black-out periods may also be prescribed from time to time as a result of special circumstances relating to the Company. All directors and officers and employees with knowledge of such special circumstances will be covered by the black-out.
12.Pre-Clearance of Trades
In order to assist in preventing even the appearance of an improper insider trade, all proposed transactions in securities of the Company (including the exercise of stock options) by directors and officers of the Company and those employees who receive notice pursuant to Section 4(c) above must be pre-cleared with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel.
Persons subject to the pre-clearance restriction should contact the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel, orally or in writing, at least two business days (or such shorter period as the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel may determine) in advance and may not effect any transaction subject to the pre-clearance request unless given clearance to do so. A pre-clearance request should include the following information:
•The nature of the proposed transaction.
•The expected date of the transaction.
•The number of shares involved.
•If the transaction involves a stock option exercise, the specific option to be exercised.
•Contact information for the broker who will execute the transaction.
•A confirmation that the insider has carefully considered whether he or she may be aware of any material nonpublic information relating to the Company (describing any borderline matters or items of potential concern) and has concluded that he or she does not.
•Whether the transaction complies with all rules and regulations, including Rule 144, Rule 701, Form S-8, and Section 16 of the Exchange Act, applicable to securities transactions by the insider.
•Any other information that is material to the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel’s consideration of the proposed transaction.
Any pre-clearance request that has been granted will be valid only for three business days following the approval date, provided that the insider complies with all other securities law and Company requirements, unless terminated earlier by the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel. If a transaction for which pre-clearance has been granted is not effected within such period, the transaction must be pre-cleared again.
5
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. | INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY | ||||
To the extent that a material event or development affecting the Company remains non-public, persons subject to the pre-clearance requirement will not be given permission to effect transactions in securities of the Company. Such persons may not be informed of the reason why they may not trade. Any person that is made aware of the reason for an event-specific prohibition on trading shall not disclose the reason for the prohibition to third parties and should avoid disclosing the existence of the prohibition.
13.Pre-Clearance of Rule 10b5-1 Plans
Pre-clearance by the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel is required for directors, officer and employees (each a “Pre-Clearance Person”) to enter into or modify a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan (a “10b5-1 Plan”). Plans that are not pre-cleared may not be used by a Pre-Clearance Person. Pre-clearance must be requested at least five full trading days prior to entry into or modification of the 10b5-1 Plan and be accompanied by a copy of the plan. However, pre-clearance will not be required for individual transactions effected pursuant to a pre-cleared 10b5-1 Plan. When adopting a new or modified Trading Plan, a director or officer must include a representation in the Trading Plan certifying that, on the date of adoption or modification of such plan, the individual director or officer is not aware of any material, non-public information and the individual director or officer is adopting the Trading Plan in good faith and not as part of a plan or scheme to evade the prohibitions of Rule 10b5-1.
All Section 16 officers must immediately report the results of transactions effected under a trading plan to the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel since they will be reportable on Form 4 within two business days following the execution of the trade.
All Pre-Clearance Persons must ensure that their broker does not execute any transaction for the Pre-Clearance Person (other than under a pre-cleared Rule 10b5-1 Plan) until the broker has verified with the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel that the transaction has been pre-cleared.
To facilitate timely reporting under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, Section 16 officers are required to on the same day as the trade date, or, with respect to transactions effected pursuant to a 10b5-1 Plan, on the day the Section 16 officer is advised of the terms of the transaction, (a) report the details of each transaction to the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel and (b) arrange with persons whose trades must be reported by the Section 16 officer (such as immediate family members living in the insider’s household) to immediately report directly to the Company and to the Section 16 officer the following transaction details:
•Transaction date (trade date)
•Number of shares involved.
•Price per share at which the transaction was executed (before addition or deduction of brokerage commission and other transaction fees).
•For stock option exercises, the specific option exercised.
•Contact information for the broker who executed the transaction.
•Specific representation that the insider is not in possession of material non-public information.
•For a Section 16 officer, a specific representation whether the transaction was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
6
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. | INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY | ||||
The transaction details must be reported to the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel, with copies to Company personnel (if any) who assist the Section 16 officer in preparing his or her Form 4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an insider will not be deemed to have violated this Policy for transactions pursuant to a 10b5-1 Plan that has been pre-cleared by the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel. The Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel may withhold or condition pre-clearance of any proposed 10b5-1 Plan (each, a “Proposed Plan”) for any reason, in his or her sole discretion.
The Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel will not pre-clear a Proposed Plan if he or she concludes that the Proposed Plan:
•Fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1, as amended from time to time;
•Would permit a transaction to occur before the later of (i) 90 days after adoption (including deemed adoption) of the Proposed Plan or (ii) two business days after disclosure of the issuer’s financial results in a Form 10-Q or Form 10-K for the quarter in which the Proposed Plan was adopted (subject to a maximum of 120 days after adoption of the Proposed Plan).
•Is established during a blackout period, or the insider is unable to represent to the satisfaction of the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel that the insider is not in possession of material nonpublic information regarding the Company.
•Lacks appropriate mechanisms to ensure that the insider complies with all rules and regulations, including Rule 144, Rule 701, Form S-8, and Section 16 of the Exchange Act, applicable to securities transactions by the insider.
•Does not provide the Company the right to suspend all transactions under the Proposed Plan if the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, deems such suspension necessary or advisable, including suspensions to comply with any “lock-up” agreement the Company agrees to in connection with a financing or other similar events.
•Exposes the Company to liability under any other applicable state or federal rule, regulation or law;
•Creates any appearance of impropriety;
•Fails to meet guidelines established by the Company; or
•Otherwise fails to satisfy the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel for any reason.
Any modifications to or deviations from a 10b5-1 Plan are deemed to be the insider entering into a new 10b5-1 Plan and, accordingly, require pre-clearance of such modification or deviation.
Any termination of a 10b5-1 Plan must be immediately reported to the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel. If an insider has pre-cleared a new 10b5-1 Plan (the “Second Plan”) intended to succeed an earlier pre-cleared 10b5-1 Plan (the “First Plan”), the Insider may not affirmatively terminate the First Plan without pre-clearance because such termination is deemed to be entering into the Second Plan.
7
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. | INSIDER TRADING AND REPORTING POLICY | ||||
None of the Company, the Chief Financial Officer and/or General Counsel, nor any of the Company’s officers, employees or other representatives shall be deemed, solely by their pre-clearance of a Proposed Plan, to have represented that it complies with Rule 10b5-1 or to have assumed any liability or responsibility to the Insider or any other party if the 10b5-1 Plan fails to comply with Rule 10b5-1.
Upon entering into or amending a 10b5-1 Plan, the director or officer must promptly provide a copy of the plan to the Company and, upon request, confirm the Company’s planned disclosure regarding the entry into or termination of a plan (including the date of adoption or termination of the plan, duration of the plan, and aggregate number of securities to be sold or purchased under the plan.
14.This Policy Is Subject to Revision.
The Company may change the terms of this Policy from time to time to respond to developments in law and practice and will take steps to inform all affected persons of any material changes.
8
Exhibit 21.1
Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc.
Subsidiaries
•Charlotte’s Web, Inc. (Delaware)
•Abacus Products, Inc. (British Columbia)
•Abacus Health Products, Inc. (Delaware)
•Abacus Wellness, Inc. (Delaware)
•CBD Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (Israel)
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 19, 2025 with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2024 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2024.
PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP
New York, New York
March 19, 2025
Exhibit 23.2
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1)Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-271596) of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc.,
(2)Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-278138) pertaining to the Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. Amended 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and
(3)Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-272055) pertaining to the Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. Amended 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
of our report dated March 21, 2024, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2024.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 19, 2025
Denver, Colorado
March 19, 2025
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A‑14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES‑OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, William Morachnick, certify that:
1.I have reviewed the 2024 Annual Report on Form 10‑K of Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc.;
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and
b.Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and
c.Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 19, 2025
| /s/ William Morachnick | ||
William Morachnick
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A‑14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES‑OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Erika Lind, certify that:
1.I have reviewed the 2024 Annual Report on Form 10‑K of Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc.;
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and
b.Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and
c.Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 19, 2025
| /s/ Erika Lind | ||
Erika Lind
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2024, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William Morachnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
Dated: November 14, 2024
/s/ William Morachnick | ||
William Morachnick
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2024, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Erika Lind, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
Dated: November 14, 2024
| /s/ Erika Lind | ||
Erika Lind
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 97.1
CHARLOTTE’S WEB HOLDINGS, INC.
CLAWBACK POLICY
July 10, 2019
Revised November 13, 2023
CHARLOTTE'S WEB HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Company")
The board of directors (the "Board") of the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to adopt a formal written policy (the "Policy") providing for the Company’s recoupment of erroneously awarded incentive compensation paid to the Covered Executives in cases of a material financial statement restatement or wrongful conduct which improperly resulted in the overpayment of incentive compensation to those executive officers. In such circumstances, the Board may determine to recoup incentive compensation which was paid or granted based upon (i) the achievement of a financial reporting measure, to the extent that the amount of such compensation would have been lower if the financial results had been properly reported, or (ii) performance targets that were achieved through wrongful conduct and, in either case, may seek to cancel Share Awards (as defined below) where the financial results of the Company or improperly attained performance targets were considered in granting such awards.
1. Definitions
For purposes of this Policy, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
a)"Compensation Committee" shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee as the Board may, from time to time, appoint to oversee the Company’s executive compensation policies.
b)"Covered Executives" shall mean the current and past Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel, Principal Accounting Officer and other executive officers, as determined by the Board.
c)“Erroneously Awarded” shall mean the amount of Incentive Compensation during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date on which the Company was required to prepare the restatement, to the extent such amount exceeds the amount that otherwise would have been received had the amount been determined based on the restatement.
d)“Financial Reporting Measure” shall mean any measure that is determined and presented in accordance with the accounting principles used in preparing the Company’s financial statements, and any measures that are derived wholly or in part from such measures, whether or not such measure is presented within the financial statements or included in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Stock price and total shareholder return are Financial Reporting Measures.
e)"Incentive Compensation" shall mean all bonus payments, grants and awards under any share-based incentive compensation plans in effect from time to time and shall include all Share Awards and all payments made on or in connection with the vesting or exercise of any Share Awards and any other incentive compensation that may be paid or granted from time to time based on the achievement of financial results.
f)“Restatement” means an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, including any required accounting restatement to correct an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements (i.e., a “Big R” restatement), or that would result in a material misstatement if the error was corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period (i.e., a “little r” restatement).
g)"Share Awards" shall mean stock options, deferred share units, restricted share awards, restricted share units, performance granted restricted share awards, performance granted restricted share units, performance granted share units or other similar forms of share awards granted to Covered Executives from time to time under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, as amended or adopted by the Company from time to time.
h)"Wrongful Conduct" shall mean fraud, gross negligence or intentional misconduct.
2. Recoupment of Incentive Compensation
In the event of:
(a) a Restatement of financial results due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities laws, other than as a result of a change or amendment in accounting principles or applicable securities laws (a "Restatement"); or
(b) the determination by the Board that Wrongful Conduct has occurred,
the Board will review all Incentive Compensation paid or granted to the Covered Executives on the basis of having met or exceeded specific performance targets for performance periods during the time period covered by the Restatement or in which the Wrongful Conduct occurred.
Subject to the limitation period in Section 4, to the extent permitted by applicable law and taking into account all factors considered relevant by the Board in its sole discretion, the Board may seek to recoup Incentive Compensation paid or granted to any current or former Covered Executive in the 36 month period preceding the date of the Restatement or the Wrongful Conduct, if and to the extent that:
(a) the amount or the granting of Incentive Compensation was calculated based upon the achievement of certain financial results or performance targets that were subsequently reduced or otherwise determined not to have been properly achieved due to the Restatement or Wrongful Conduct; and
(b) the amount or the granting of Incentive Compensation that would have been paid or granted to the Covered Executive had the financial results been properly reported or the performance targets been properly determined would have been lower than the amount actually paid or granted to the Covered Executive.
If the Restatement or Wrongful Conduct affects financial results or performance targets in multiple years within the limitation period prescribed by Section 4, the Incentive Compensation will be recalculated for all years and any recoupment will be limited to the net impact over that multiple year period.
3. Recoupment from Covered Executives in Connection with a Restatement
The Board may seek recoupment in connection with a Restatement under Section 2 of this Policy from a Covered Executive whether or not the Covered Executive engaged in the Wrongful Conduct that caused the need for the Restatement.
4. Sources of Recoupment
The Board may seek recoupment from the Covered Executives from any of the following sources: (a) prior Incentive Compensation payments; (b) future payments of Incentive Compensation; (c) cancellation of vested or unvested Share Awards; (d) future Share Awards; and (e) direct repayment.
5. No Indemnification or Insurance
The Company will not indemnify, insure or otherwise reimburse any Covered Officer against the recovery of Incentive Compensation Erroneously Awarded.
6. Recoupment Net of Non-Recoverable Income Taxes
In connection with the recoupment of Incentive Compensation hereunder, the Board may, at its discretion, either:
(a) offset the full pre-tax amount of Incentive Compensation to be recouped from a Covered Executive under this Policy against future Incentive Compensation payable to such Covered Executive; or
(b) limit the recoupment from a Covered Executive to the amount of Incentive Compensation subject to recoupment less any income taxes in respect of the amounts being recouped that were actually paid or are actually payable, and not recoverable, by such Covered Executive. In such case, the amount of the income taxes paid or payable by a Covered Executive shall be calculated at the highest marginal federal and provincial or state income tax rate that the Covered Executive would have paid in the Covered Executive’s province or state of residence assuming the Covered Executive had no other sources of income or loss.
7. Binding Effect of Determinations by Board; Delegation
The Board may delegate to the Compensation Committee all determinations to be made and actions to be taken by the Board under this Policy. Any determination made by the Board or the Compensation Committee under this Policy shall be final, binding and conclusive on all parties.
8. Effective Date
This Policy shall be effective as of July 10, 2019 (the "Effective Date"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Incentive Compensation received by a person in his or her capacity as a Covered Executive prior to the Effective Date could nonetheless be subject to recoupment under this Policy, subject to the limitation prescribed by Section 4. This Policy may be terminated or amended at any time by the Board in its sole discretion.
9. Severability
If any provision of this Policy or the application of any such provision to any Covered Executive shall be adjudicated to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions of this Policy, and the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision(s) shall be deemed amended to the minimum extent necessary to render any such provision(s) or application enforceable.
10. No Impairment of Other Remedies
This Policy does not preclude the Company from taking any other action to enforce a Covered Executive’s obligations to the Company, including termination of employment or institution of civil or criminal proceedings upon a finding of Wrongful Conduct or other misconduct on the part of the Covered Executive.
11. Governing Law
This Policy shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the Province of British Columbia and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.