Good morning, welcome to the CEMEX third quarter 2024 conference call and webcast. My name is Charlie and I'll be the operator for today. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session. If at any time you require operator assistance, please press star followed by zero and we'll be happy to assist you. And now I will turn the conference over to Lucy Rodriguez, Chief Communications Officer. Please proceed.

Good morning. Thank you for joining us today for our fourth quarter 2024 conference call and webcast. We hope this call finds you well. I am joined today by Fernando Gonzalez, our CEO, and Mahir Al-Hafar, our CFO. As always, we will spend a few minutes reviewing the business and outlook for 2025, and then we will be happy to take your questions. As you know, in connection with the announced asset sales in 2024. We closed the sale of our Guatemala and Philippines operations as well as the remaining minority stake in New York. Our Dominican Republic operations remained accounted for as discontinued operations as of the end of 2024. This divestment was closed last week on January 30th. Our reported results assume the sale of these operations for the full year and year-over-year like-to-like variations are for the current footprint. And now, I will hand it over to Fernando.

Thanks, Lucy, and good day to everyone. I'm very pleased with our achievements in 2024, which represents a pivotal year in the corporate transformation we envisioned in 2020. Set in the backdrop early in the year, we achieved our long-running goal of recovering our investment-grade rating. While we remain committed to additional credit improvements in the near term, this achievement provides a runway to more aggressively pursue our growth strategy and lay the foundation for a sustainable shareholder return program. Our leverage ratio stood at 1.81 times, its lowest level since the outbreak of the global financial crisis. With the restoration of our financial health and several years of progress on our growth strategy, we took the first step on a shareholder return policy with announcement of a progressive dividend program in March 2024. We expect to expand this in the future years with opportunistic use of our 500 million share buyback program. Through the execution of 2.2 billion dollars in announced divestitures in 2024. We significantly rebalance our portfolio towards developed markets with more consistent and attractive growth potential. Approximately 90% of our EBITDA is now generated in the U.S., Europe, and Mexico. Divestment proceeds will free up additional resources for future organic growth opportunities and small to medium-sized acquisitions focus primarily on the U.S. in urbanization solutions and aggregates. As we move towards introducing an organic growth to the portfolio, we expect to gradually reduce our strategic APEX spending. Net income for the year reached $939 million, a record level in recent history. On future in action, we continue making progress on profitable decarbonization, reducing the our Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2 emissions by 15% and by about 17% respectively, compared to 2020. In addition, as we look towards developing the new technology necessary to decarbonize beyond 2030, a CEMEX-led consumption was selected to receive 157 million euros of EU innovation funding for carbon capture at Rudelsdorf, which is expected to become CEMEC's first net-zero plant. We are optimistic about the future. In the last three years, we have undergone a cyclical downturn in demand in several of our key markets, most notably in the U.S. and Europe. While we have been able to more than upset this decline with pricing, cost efficiencies, and growth investments, this is an opportunity for the future as demand returns to these markets. We expect volumes to begin recovering in the U.S. and Europe this year, which sustain demand growth over the medium term. While we are confident on the medium term fundamentals in Mexico, we have limited visibility on 2025 outlook with a difficult comparable base, FX, headwinds, a new administration setting into office in Mexico and the United States. In this environment, we are focusing on the variables we can control. While we have achieved a significant improvement in our consolidated profitability metrics, reaching higher operating efficiency levels, EBITDA margins, and free cash flow generation, there is more to be done. We are launching our project Cutting Edge, which encompasses a three-year $350 million cost program anticipated to deliver EBITDA savings of $150 million in 2025. Macher will elaborate on this initiative. After an exceptional year in 2023, we delivered strong results in 2024. In fact, last year, we posted the second strongest sales on EBITDA. We also achieved the highest free cash flow after maintenance CAPEX in 2017, adjusting for the extraordinary payment of the Spanish tax fine. As you know, the guidance we provide at the beginning of each year is based on prevailing FX rates. Adjusting for significant FX volatility experience during the year, we achieved our 2024 initial guidance of a low to mid-single-digit EBITDA growth. In 2024, in a muted volume environment, we focused our attention on costs as well as optimizing production with increases in operating efficiency in key markets. As a result of these efforts, consolidated EBITDA was relatively stable in 2024 and grew by 3% in fourth quarter. EBITDA margin was also resilient and grew in four quarters driven by positive price cost dynamics in all regions. Free cash flow benefited from an impressive turnaround in working capital. Maher will provide additional details on our working capital efforts. Consolidated prices increased by 3% in cement and ready mix and by 2% in aggregates during 2024, reflecting higher price levels in most markets. While pricing gains have moderated compared to recent years, they more than upset cost inflation despite an adverse demand environment. Inflation in our products decelerated in 2024 to a low single-digit percentage. Going forward, our pricing strategy remains unchanged, aiming to more than recover cost inflation in our markets. In 2024, volumes were stable to lower in all regions. Importantly, volume decline has moderated sequentially in four quarters in virtually all regions. EMEA continued its second half recovery trend with high single-digit growth in cement and aggregates in Europe, while Middle Eastern Africa reported double-digit growth in ready mix and aggregates in four quarters. In the U.S., weather continued to impact volumes in four quarters, largely due to the devastation caused by Hurricane Milton in October in Florida. In 2024, Mexico posted relatively stable volumes as pre-election demand dynamics were offset by slower construction activity in the second half. During the year, we saw strong price-cost dynamics, with pricing contribution to EBITDA more than compensating for decelerating input cost inflation. This positive effect was offset by lower volumes and adverse effects dynamics resulting in a roughly flat performance and stable margin. Importantly, in fourth quarter, volume impact to consolidated EBITDA moderated as volumes stabilized. Growth investments continue supporting EBITDA performance. On the cost side, we've benefited from a 13% decline in energy costs, mainly driven by lower fuel prices. During the quarter, this favorable energy environment continued driving higher EBITDA and margin. We expect both pricing dynamics and energy costs to remain a tailwind into 2025. However, we expect FX rates to be a headwind, mainly in our operations in Mexico and to lesser extent in Europe, particularly in the first half of the year. Importantly, our FX hedging strategy mitigates the impact of a strong dollar and protects our leverage ratio. Evidying our urbanization solutions increased 4% in 2024, with margin expanding by 1.1 percentage points. Positive performance is mainly driven by growth in higher margin businesses such as construction and demolition waste recycling, mortars and admixtures. Since 2019 EBDI in these three segments has grown at double digit rates. Our urbanization solutions portfolio addresses the changing landscape of the construction industry focusing on sustainability and climate resiliency solutions. On future in action, our successful decarbonization efforts in 2024 continue to rely on existing profitable technology as we look to abate before relying in carbon capture technology. We have reduced our scope 1 and scope 2 CO2 emissions by 15% and by about 17% respectively compared to 2020, a reduction that historically would have taken us 16 years to achieve. Based on our progress, we are well on our way to reach our 2025 and 2030 SBTI verified CO2 emissions targets. In this decade to deliver, we continue innovating around carbon capture and other technologies to drive the carbonization beyond 2030. As I mentioned earlier, a CEMEX-led consumption was selected to receive EU innovation funding for carbon capture at Rudersdorf, which is expected to become our first net-zero plant. And more recently, our Knoxville cement plant was awarded funding from the U.S. Department of Energy to develop a pioneering carbon capture removal and conversion test center. These awards are recognition of our commitment to advancing decarbonization solutions in our industry. Finally, we are very pleased with the adoption of our lower-carbon family of products, Vertua. In 2024, we increased the adoption rate by 7 percentage points of Vertua cement and ready mix. We have already surpassed our 2025 adoption target of 50%, with more than 63% of cement volumes and 55% of ready-mix volumes having BERTWA attributes. Over the last four years, consolidated EBITDA has shown solid growth with a 9% annual growth rate driven not only by our organic performance, but also by our growth strategy. Close to 50% of our $3.1 billion growth investment pipeline has come online, contributing $344 million in EBITDA in 2024. These projects are delivering average IRRs of 35% or an EBITDA multiple of about four times. These projects offer important synergies with our existing portfolio and customers in our key markets. We expect this pipeline to contribute approximately $700 million in EBITDA by 2028, with close to 50% coming from investments in the U.S. As we continue developing the strategy and relying more on small to medium-sized acquisitions, we expect overall return metrics to be somewhat tighter. And now, back to you, Lucy.

Thank you, Fernanda. In our operations in Mexico, despite a challenging volume backdrop in the second half, EBITDA for the full year increased by 3% with margin improvement of almost one percentage point. EBITDA declined in fourth quarter due to a tough prior year comparison base where we posted the highest fourth quarter EBITDA on record. Mexican demand had two speeds in 2024 with cement volumes growing six percent in the first half and declining seven percent in the second half post-election. In the fourth quarter we continued to see volume deceleration aligned to third quarter behavior in cement and continued out performance in ReadyMix. ReadyMix volumes remains supported by the formal sector in the Northeast and Central regions. Depreciation of the Mexican Peso resulted in an EBITDA effect of $48 million in the quarter and $52 million in full-year results. As Fernando explained, our dynamic FX hedging strategy is paying off, mitigating impact on our leverage ratio. In January, we announced price increases of approximately 15 percent in cement and 12 percent in ready mix to offset rising input cost inflation while we are optimistic on medium-term growth prospects we expect in 2025 to see the typical decline in public construction spending of the first year of a new government the infrastructure sector continues to face a difficult year-over-year comparison due to unusually high project execution pre-election. While the 2025 federal budget contemplates new projects such as rail and port renovations, highway and rural road construction, it will take time to ramp up the spending. We continue to see ongoing projects at the state level, however, such as the San Miguel de Allende-Volores Highway, the Metro in Monterey, and Los Mochis Airport, to name a few. While industrial sector demand continued to grow in fourth quarter, our ReadyMix order book did experience some disruption late last year. We believe this sector will resume its growth once there is more clarity around US-Mexico trade policy. After many years of a subdued formal housing sector, we expect growth driven by the recently announced National Housing Program, where the government is targeting 125,000 homes to be built in 2025. This will, of course, take time, but we are encouraged by the fact that some potential projects are already under discussion. The combination of high remittances, high employment levels, increased wages, and lower inflation should support the self-construction sector going forward. Similar to 2024, we expect this year will be a story of two distinct halves. The year-over-year volume comparison and FX rate differential create headwinds in the first half with more favorable performance expected in the back half. In 2024, our operations in the U.S. have been affected by extreme weather events with four major hurricanes and a deep freeze in Texas. We estimate these events were responsible for an EBITDA impact of approximately $38 million. Adjusting for these weather events, EBITDA would have increased 3% for the whole year. The most significant event occurred in October with Hurricane Milton in Florida, our largest market, with an estimated impact of $17 million in fourth quarter. Largely, due to the hurricane, cement and ready-mix volumes declined 3% in fourth quarter, while aggregates declined 7%. On a sequential basis, while cement and ready-mix prices remained stable in fourth quarter, aggregate prices increased by 2%. Importantly, even with lower volumes, full-year EBITDA was stable, while margins expanded due to cost optimization efforts, lower fuel prices, and imports. Investment maintenance over the last years is paying off with higher operational efficiency, allowing us to substitute more profitable domestic production or imports. For 2025, we expect demand to be driven by infrastructure as transportation projects under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act continue to roll out. Peak spending years for IIJA are expected to be 2025 and 2026, and indeed, the new high reached in December construction start data backs up this projection. While mortgage rates have remained at high levels, we believe that the more cement-intensive single-family housing starts bottomed out in third quarter 2024. While there is substantial upside in housing over the medium term, we expect residential to stabilize at current levels in 2025. The industrial sector should continue to benefit from large investments in our states as manufacturing projects roll out. In addition, we expect significant demand from the construction of AI-empowered data centers in our key states, which have been the primary recipients of such investment to date. We see further upside going forward from Microsoft's $40 billion spending program in the U.S. in 2025, as well as the $500 billion Stargate program recently announced by the Trump administration. In 2025, we expect volumes, pricing, and continued optimization efforts to drive results. Over the medium term, we continue to believe the U.S. offers the best risk-weighted returns. Our investment focus remains on the U.S., where we intend to expand our aggregates business, which already accounts for 35 percent of U.S. EBITDA, and further develop our urbanization solutions portfolio. We are pleased with our results in EMEA, where we are seeing continued improvement in our European operations. In fourth quarter, EBITDA grew by an impressive 43%, while margin expanded by 3.6 percentage points. EBITDA growth and margin improvement was driven by volumes, operational leverage, as well as a one-off adjustment in our UK operation. Europe's EBITDA increased by 30%, marking the second consecutive quarter of growth, and with all countries in Europe showing year-over-year cement volume growth. We continue to see Eastern Europe benefiting from EU-funded infrastructure spending, while Western Europe shows signs of recovery against an easier comparison base. Prices for our three core products for the full year more than offset decelerating cost inflation, particularly in energy. On climate action, with a 5% reduction in CO2 emissions in 2024, Cemex Europe continues delivering record levels of decarbonization. Our region is very close to reaching both the European Cement Associations and Cemex's consolidated 2030 CO2 emissions targets. Finally, in the Middle East and Africa, EBITDA improved due to better pricing dynamics in Egypt and increased construction activity in Israel. For 2025, we expect continued EMEA volume recovery driven by Europe's improved construction activity with a low single-digit increase for cement and ready mix and stable volumes in aggregates. Our operations in South Central America and the Caribbean once again delivered positive results in 2024 amidst a challenging demand backdrop with growth in EBITDA led by positive pricing dynamics. Cement and ReadyMix prices grew 4% and 11% respectively, offsetting cost pressures and leading to a stable EBITDA margin. The formal sector continues driving demand in the region with large infrastructure projects such as Bogota Metro in which CEMEX has been awarded more than 80 percent of total volumes and the fourth bridge over the canal in Panama. Our urbanization solutions business is expanding rapidly, hosting record EBITDA growth of 36 percent in 2024 with a margin expansion of 5.3 percentage points. For 2025, we expect a mid-single-digit and low-double-digit increase in cement and ready-mix volumes, respectively, as formal construction continues growing on the back of infrastructure projects. And now, I will pass the call to Maher to review our financial developments.

Thank you, Lucy, and good day to everyone. As Fernando mentioned earlier, we are very pleased in delivering strong results on the back of a phenomenal 2023, regaining investment grade rating and advancing on our decarbonization agenda in line with our 2030 goals. Despite volume headwinds, our full year 2024 EBITDA margin showed remarkable resilience and was flat the last year at 19%. This performance was supported by our pricing strategy, which outpaced inflation in our business, as well as cost containment and business optimization efforts. 2024 free cash flow after maintenance capex, adjusted for the payment of the Spanish tax fine, was slightly higher than the prior year, driven by a $215 million divestment in working capital. This improvement is the result of targeted management actions to increase efficiency of our assets across the organization on the cost side fuel costs on a per ton of cement basis declined by 23 driven by lower fuel prices the increased use of lower cost and lower carbon fuels and our continued reduction in clinker factor for 2025 we have closed hedges for almost 70 percent of our annual spend related to electricity diesel freight petco and natural gas net income for 2024 was 939 million dollars driven primarily by a lower effective tax rate and the gain from the sale of operations in guatemala and our minority stake in new yorks given the volatility in the mexican peso i would like to highlight our ongoing mexican peso hedging strategy fully covering our operating cash flow from our operations that effectively lowers the volatility of the exchange rate at which we convert pesos into dollars for tenors of up to two years. The benefit of this strategy in our consolidated net debt reached $215 million in 2024, including conversion gains on peso-denominated debt. Our leverage ratio stood at 1.81 times in December 2024, due primarily to divestments, FX hedging strategies, and free cash flow. We are pleased to announce the launch of our Project Cutting Edge, a project to capture recurring savings by changing the way we execute key business processes and accelerating efficiencies in our operations. After several years of post-pandemic business normalization and portfolio rebalancing, this project was developed during last year and responds to recent years of high inflation, supply chain disruptions, evolving market dynamics, and greater availability and scalability of emerging technologies. As Fernando mentioned, we expect this program to provide recurrent yearly EBITDA savings of $350 million by 2027. In 2025, we expect EBITDA savings of approximately $150 million, with some additional benefits in working capital. Project Cutting Edge targets several key elements of how we do business, including supply chain, logistics, procurement, operations, and others. We are redesigning, simplifying, and automating many of our current processes and workflows, leveraging artificial intelligence and data analytics. Our supply chain management will be enhanced end-to-end, leading to an improved client and supplier interface and experience. In operations, we will accelerate our progress in optimizing cement and ready mix networks, enhance fuel mix, continue improving cement efficiency in the U.S., along with other SG&A initiatives. In addition, Project Cutting Edge contemplates important savings at the free cash flow level for 2025 and onwards. We will update you on the program's progress as we move along in its implementation. And now back to you, Fernando.

We are optimistic about growth in the U.S., EMEA, and South Central America and the Caribbean in 2025. As I explained earlier, visibility for Mexico is currently low, but we believe we face a challenging landscape both in terms of demand in the first year of a new administration and PESO FX rates, particularly in the first half of 2025. After a very volatile year for the PESO, assuming December 2024 FX rates, this will imply a depreciation of close to 20% in the first half of 2025. After incorporating $150 million in EBITDA savings from Project Cotton Edge, as well as the PESO headwind, we are guiding to flattish EBITDA performance for 2025. It is important to know that our guidance assumes a low single-digital growth excluding FX impact. We anticipate volume growth in all regions as at Mexico. Full volume guidance can be found in the appendix. We expect that pricing will continue to more than compensate for decelerating input cost inflation, particularly in energy. On a consolidated basis, we expect continued tailwinds with total energy cost per ton of cement produced declining by a high single-digit rate in 2025. With regards to free cash flow items, Project Cutting Edge incorporates certain efficiencies which we are reflecting in our 2025 guidance as well as additional free cash flow savings for future years. For 2025, we are guiding to a reduction in maintenance capex taxes as well as cash interest expense versus last year. In total, we expect approximately $500 million in savings in free cash flow after maintenance capex, representing about 65% growth versus 2024. And I'm even more pleased to tell you that now that we have regained our financial footing, we have more opportunities in future years to build on this success. With more cash from operations available, as well as proceeds from $2.2 billion in divestments, we have resources to pursue more aggressively our capital allocation priorities. First, on growth. We still have a $1.6 billion of accretive projects in execution stage in our growth pipeline. 2025 is the year where we expect to have the largest spend and we are guiding to 600 million in strategic capex this year you should expect however that over the next few years spending on growth capex will cycle down while our small to mid-size acquisition strategy ramps up Asset sales proceeds are intended to be recycled for acquisitions, focusing primarily on the U.S. market. This will take time to identify, win, and execute transactions under our discipline M&A framework. In the interim, this cash will be used to reduce debt. Additionally, we intend to direct a portion of our operational free cash flow to reduce debt and lower our financial burden to better reflect our improved credit standing. We remain committed to reach our leverage target of 1.5 times in the near term. Finally, cash from operations allow us to increase shareholder return both in terms of delivering on our progressive dividend commitment as well as eventually taking opportunistic use of our share buyback program. and now back to you Lucy.

Before we go into our Q&A session, I would like to remind you that any forward-looking statements we make today are based on our current knowledge of the markets in which we operate and could change in the future due to a variety of factors beyond our control. In addition, unless the context indicates otherwise, all references to pricing initiatives, price increases or decreases refer to prices for our products and now we will be happy to take your questions in the interest of time and to give other people an opportunity to participate we kindly ask that you limit yourself to only one question if you wish to ask a question please press star followed by one on your touchtone telephone if your question has already been answered or you wish to withdraw your question, press star followed by two. Press star one to begin. And the first question comes from Ben Thurer from Barclays. Ben?

Yeah, good morning, Fernando, Lucy, Maher. First of all, congrats on the strong finish still. So the question I wanted to ask really comes back to what Fernando started to elaborate on as it relates to capital allocation And maybe you help us a little bit in terms of prioritization. Clearly, you have the layout of the $600 million on the strategic capex, but there is obviously a lot left over that could go either into what you said, the dividends of the potential share buybacks, but also M&A at some point. So as we think about the onset and the opportunities in 2025, where do you think the largest opportunities lie within your capital allocation framework that you've just introduced? And how should we think about the dividend itself from what does progressive growth mean? So that would be like the key question I have. And then if you could give me just a one-time answer on what the one-off was in your UK operations.

Yeah, maybe I'll take the... Hi, Ben. Thank you very much for your comments. And maybe I'll take the first stab of answering the question. and then Fernando can help me out if I miss out on anything here. I think the first thing to think about in terms of capital allocation going forward is the emphasis that we are putting on further free cash flow generation. And I think you heard Fernando's comments about how we're expecting to be improving our free cash flow generation for this year by close to $500 million, dollars um which is very important that that translates to a huge change in in conversion of even to uh free cash flow for the year and that that should go towards capital allocation as well and you know don't want to guide beyond 25 but certainly you know uh psychologically strategically that's the the approach and uh the other thing that is also important to mention is that this year is probably going to be the highest um it's gonna be probably the peak year in terms of strategic CapEx spending. And going forward, you know, we are probably going to be much more biased towards focusing on small and medium M&A activity, which should be as accretive as the investments that we have made and should be, you know, contributing to the bottom line kind of immediately as we make that. So those two points are very important to keep in mind. Today, you know, as we've discussed, we believe that growth investments are the most accretive use of our cash. The majority of the investments are generating in excess of 30% IRRs. They have payback periods of three to four years. And as you know, we've already completed close to a billion and a half in the last few years. And that is contributing, for this year at least, close to $350 million of EBITDA. And this is being done at a very attractive, effective multiple of close to four times, you know, which compares favorably to where we're currently trading at in the market. Now, the investment pipeline is, of course, much more than that. You know, we're expecting almost an equal amount to be executed by 28, which should take us to a close contribution of about $700 million by 2028. Now, in terms of priorities, I mean, clearly, because of these return dynamics, we will continue to invest in growth and M&A. Having said that, we do believe that our interest expense, when we take a look at our peers and our leverage compared to our peers. We think that we have a lot of upside here, both in terms of reducing leverage, reducing interest expense. I mean, we're almost double, if we take a look at our interest expense as a percentage of EBITDA, we're almost double our global peers. And so that's something that we would like to bring down. Leverage, we're probably a turn away from global peers. So that's something that we will be working on. And of course, as we achieve all of that, You know, we will definitely take a look at returning capital to shareholders, either in the form of dividends, as we have done and will continue to do, or eventually, you know, exercising share buybacks under our program. I don't know, Fernando, you want to add anything to that?

Well, maybe – thanks, Ben, for your comments. Maybe just commenting that you can most probably perceive that in the last few years, we have been adjusting our, let's say, our strategies and the use of capital, if you remember, and we constantly communicate what we are planning to do. And we started in 2020 with the idea of using a portion of our free cash flow to make some growth investments both on businesses that are related with our own portfolio with high synergies short paybacks and the likes and of course we didn't have the muscle to do everything in the first year but we started building it and now we have a a pipeline of very attractive projects of that type of investments but at the same time we have been improving our balance sheet And this year, I mean, last year in our CEMEX Day, we did communicate that we wanted to move from that focus to a more equilibrated one in terms of we want to continue the leveraging. And we mentioned another half a turn in a couple of years, but we wanted to start a progressive dividend and at the same time continue with these investments. But in this investments, as Maher said, and I think it's just natural, we're going to be moving from mostly growth capex to, and we will continue doing that, but we will add some small to mid-sized acquisitions. So, the growth portfolio is going to be evolving into that equation more M&A and a figure that is going to be lower on the type of investments we have been doing in the last four years. So, that's the only clarification I have.

And Ben, maybe I can take your question on EMEA. We had great results in EMEA in fourth quarter we're seeing that european recovery that we were expecting um you know both emia evita as well as european evita was up in the 30 area now a portion of that we did mention was you know because of a one-off legal case that was resolved during the quarter commercial case and that contributed about 10 million of the 50 million incremental ebitda we saw both at the European and EMEA levels, just to give you some sense of magnitude of that. So, hopefully, we've answered your questions.

Very clear. Thank you very much.

Okay. And the next question comes from Carlos Perilong from Bank of America. Carlos?

Thank you, Lucy. Thank you for the call, Fernanda Maher. My question is to the pricing. You mentioned some remarks in the call. Just wanted to see if you could provide some more color on your pricing strategy, including the U.S. and Europe. And in the case of Mexico, you mentioned an increase in the double digits. I don't know if you could comment how the traction is doing in Mexico would be great as well. Thank you.

Yeah, Carlos. Hi, good morning. Thank you very much for your question. I mean, I think, you know, our pricing strategy going forward has not changed really from what we have followed in the last three years, frankly. And that is, you know, our pricing strategy has always been to be calibrated to what's happening on our input cost inflation, which is very important. And of course, you know, when input cost inflation was at hyper levels, as we saw, I mean, and you saw that over the last three years, our cumulative inflation total cost was close to 40%. On the other hand, we were able to implement very successful pricing strategy in virtually all of our markets, you know, exceeding that performance. Now, of course, in the last few months, you know, we have definitely seen a slowdown in our input cost inflation in all of our poor businesses. And accordingly, I think the the whole market has calibrated pricing increases uh accordingly now we do anticipate to continue our pricing strategy when we compare uh price increases compared to cost increases to be above that so we will always target a positive gap between price and cost and and we believe that the uh you know the announcements that have been made in both the us and mexico are targeted towards that. And of course, we're very optimistic that we will be able to get those positive increases. I don't know if you're aware, but we had pricing increases at a national level, both in Mexico and in the U.S. markets. And in the U.S., it's a mid-single-digit increase. In Mexico, it's a double-digit increase across all sectors, both in bulk and bags, and we're cautiously optimistic or constructive about those pricing increases because I don't think anybody in any of our businesses has a sustainable lower cost curve, frankly, that could behave in a different way than we are. Now, one thing that you have to consider, of course, is that these increases and announcements are very local market specific, and they may, you know, so when you take a look at what others are doing, there's definitely a distinct difference between where we are and the specific market dynamics, supply-demand dynamics, other potential movers in each one of those markets, right? So it's very important to take that into consideration. Fernando, I don't know if you want to.

Yes, I want to compliment Maher in terms of, again, clarifying what has been the dynamics or what has been the trend in prices and inflation in the last few years. I'm intentionally using 22, 23, and 24 because if you remember, we started seeing very high levels of inflation uh in in 22 at least in our uh cost uh inflation at the levels of between 20 and 22 and and in 22 we started um moving our pricing strategies on a very simple basis our Our pricing should at least assure that we can maintain margins. So prices of each and every product should be able to achieve that. In 2022, we didn't do it because inflation came, you know, very fast and you cannot change prices, you know, just in a jiffy. So it takes some time. So in 22, our pricing strategy didn't recover inflation, but then in 2023, the opposite happened. Our pricing strategy, because of the tailwind and all the efforts that were applied in 22, were like between six and eight percentage points higher than inflation. That was 2023. What happened in 2024 is that the gap between inflation and prices almost disappeared. uh but good enough to continue maintaining and slightly increasing our margins now even though price increases now are much lower than the 20 something percent we did in in 22 the basis of the strategy is still the same we need to assure that we maintain or increase if market dynamics allow our margins. So you can imagine we have detailed all the information needed for our sales force and managers to assure that every time we think on a pricing strategy, this idea of maintaining or increasing margins is assured. So, you know, I wish we could increase prices 20% with an inflation of, I don't know, 3%, but no, that is not necessarily doable. But you can count that we will continue insisting that our prices at least assure maintaining our margins.

Thank you, Fernando. Thank you, Fernando. Thank you, Majer.

Thank you, Carlos. The next question comes from Alejandro Obregón from Morgan Stanley.

Hi. Thank you for taking my question. It's actually a follow-up on all the prior questions on capital allocation. So I just want to make sure that I understand that this $600 million off strategic CAPEX, I mean, if we apply this sort of like three, four times multiple, it's around $100, $150 million of incremental EBTA. Is this coming on top of your EBTA guidance? and if you can sort of talk of, you know, where should we expect these incremental EBTA be coming from? And just on the buybacks and dividends comment that you mentioned, just to make sure this is happening this year, how are you thinking of dividends and buybacks for 2025? Thank you so much.

Thank you, Alejandra. Yeah, I mean, look, you know, the guidance that we've given essentially takes into consideration all of the capital allocation decisions that we have discussed. So, you know, there's no additional things to add to that. But in terms of what is the additional amount going to, I mean, obviously, we are increasing strategic CapEx from last year by a bit. Last year, we think we underperformed our guidance. You know, this year, we're definitely looking at a slight bit of an increase um as you remember last year was close to about 500 this year we're guiding 600 um the the investments are are really targeted into three areas in in in that order of perform of uh of importance uh one is uh you know expanding uh cement capacity and uh and bolt-ons um and then you know climate investments which you know, we think are doing two things. Number one is making sure that we execute on our, you know, decarbonization roadmaps, as well as improving, you know, margins in some of those businesses. And then, you know, the third bucket is aggregates replenishment. In terms of geographic I mean, we're going to continue to be biased towards the U.S. market, followed by Mexico and the U.S. And so I think but there's no additional contribution that has not been included in the guidance that we've given so far in the comments that we made before we started the Q&A. Now, in terms of dividends and buybacks, I mean, all I can tell you is to, again, repeat what Fernando said, is that, you know, we do aspire, we have indicated that our dividends should be progressive. Of course, you know, dividends will have to be proposed and approved at our AGM, which is going to happen next month. So I can't, frankly, comment on that in terms of share buybacks. Definitely, that is an area that we're always looking at. I mean, it's not something that we take off the table or put on the table from a strategic basis because of the valuation that we have for the company today. So we're always looking at that. We have the ability to do up to $500 million, as you know, and we're always calibrating. And to the extent that it makes sense to do it, we will do it. And 2025 is no different than prior years, frankly.

So, Maher, maybe if I could just add a little bit on the cadence of the contribution of our growth investments, of our growth portfolio, because I think that was part of Ali's question. You know, right now, our growth portfolio contributed about $350 million far. We expect that by 2028, that number will be 700. So, it will literally double by that point. And for this year, included in the guidance that we're giving isn't $80 million in incremental EBITDA we expect from our growth investments. And of course, when you look at our growth investment pipeline, it's about $3.1, $3.2 billion in total, and a half of that has already been completed. So hopefully that helps.

Great.

Thanks, Lucy.

Gotcha. That was very clear. Thank you, Mahan and Lucy.

The next question comes from Gordon Lee from BTG Pachual.

Hi, good morning. Thank you very much for the call. It's a bit of a housekeeping question, but linked to free cash flow, and it has to do with the Spanish tax penalty or fine. It seems to me, and I just want to confirm, that it wasn't fully paid in 2024, that it will take a little bit of that, we'll slip over to 2025. I just wanted to confirm that that was the case, and if so, that that's in your cash taxes guidance for 2025. And And I guess the second related question is, you know, sort of 15 months later, do you still think that that extra $100 million that you provisioned on the income statement in the fourth quarter of last year, is that something you may reverse or is that something that you're thinking of leaving there for the moment? Thank you.

Yeah, thanks. Thanks a lot, Gordon. Nice to hear from you. So I guess just for clarity for all of the listeners, I mean, cash taxes for the year last year was $870 million. You know, that included about $370 plus related to the Spanish tax assessments for a number of tax returns over the years. And, you know, this year, as you heard from, you know, from Fernando, that the expectation for cash taxes is 450. Now, Gordon, in terms of provisions, last year we did reverse $387 million of the tax provision that we took on three different tax matters. The biggest one, of course, is the tax returns from 2006 to 2009. And then as you recall, we had two other open tax matters in Spain that went from 2010 to 2018. We also reached an agreement with the tax authorities there and we reversed some of that provision. So the total reversal was about 300, a little bit over $380 million. dollars. We have two hundred million dollars remaining covering the additional two hundred million dollars of of the the larger tax penalty from 06 to 09 which we expect to occur over the next four years and as we pay those tax fines you know we will reverse the provisions in our income statement so I hope that answers the question and just to be clear yeah yeah just to be clear the 450 guidance for this year includes whatever portion of that penalty you expect to pay right that's included there yes it does yes it does yeah it does exactly yeah yeah perfect super

thank you very much thank you okay thanks Gordon and the next question comes from Adrienne Huerta from J.P. Morgan. Adrian?

Thank you, Lucy. Hi, Fernando Anmager, and congrats on the results. My questions are regarding the U.S. first on pricing. If you can give us a little bit more details on what happened during the year regarding pricing across different markets within the U.S. I mean, the overall price increase that you had was less versus what peers have reported for the full year. So I wonder if you were not able to push price increases in coastal markets, et cetera. So if you can just provide more details on that. And the second one is if you can just explain why the expectation on lower aggregate volumes for this year in the U.S.

Great. Thanks, Adrienne. Maybe first on pricing. We've reported low single-digit pricing increases for 2024. We were successful with mid-single-digit increases in most of our portfolio, but as you know, pricing is very local in the United States. So in about 75 to 80 percent of our volumes, we were able to get mid-single-digit pricing. Where we had a very difficult time was specifically in texas and of course in texas in the first six months of the year right when pricing normally takes place there were um there was quite a bit of dislocation with volumes down in texas houston in particular is a large import market and you had a lot of imports literally stuck on ships offshore that had to be you know had to be sent to where they needed to go fairly quickly when were openings in weather so i think that that really delayed pricing increases in the u.s we have seen a recovery in volumes in texas very very importantly in the back half of the year but it really the issue for us in the past year was specifically in texas and it had a lot to do with weather in the first six months we're hoping we don't get a repeat of a weather phenomena but i think we're very optimistic regarding pricing increases in the u.s and in texas specifically for this year. In the case of aggregates, the decline that we're guiding to largely reflects the closing of some quarries that are at end of life, effectively. We have a couple of those. These are fairly low contributions in terms of profitability relative to other quarries, and they are approaching end of life. We, of course, are looking to invest more to substitute for these, but so far we haven't found appropriate substitutes yet. So we think that that will come with time with our strategy on aggregates in the U.S. Hopefully that helps.

Yes, thank you, Lucy.

Okay, thanks, Adrienne. And the next question comes from the webcast from Anne Milne from Bank of America. A question on tariffs. Could you please give us an update on the exports you currently have from Mexico to the US and how this could shift if tariffs were to be imposed by Trump on all Mexican imports? If you were to redirect this production, would it be resolved within Mexico or to other destinations. So just quickly on this, well, not quickly, but just to answer this. First, covering it from the Mexico point of view, Mexico last year exported about 5% of their volumes to the U.S. And as you know, imports and where we import from change all the time based on the economics and where we can find the right quality and price for imports in due specific markets. Our plan for this year, even before there was any whiff of potential tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China, was to reduce, because of the profitability and where we could get imports, was to continue to reduce those imports coming from Mexico. So just within our plan, it was to you know cut it to about half of Mexican volume so 2.5 percent of total Mexican volumes more or less looking at it more from the United States perspective again imports have continued to decline for us they currently in 2024 were about 17 percent of total volumes and imports coming from Mexico have been declining as well quite significantly and the plan this year was to continue to decline. Obviously, at tariffs, we believe firmly that if tariffs are imposed within a local market on all players, that that would be positive. It would increase in import parity. It would be positive for pricing. If you see a more limited tariff action in a specific market where it only applies to one or two origins of imports, we think it would be fairly neutral in terms of pricing. So I hope that covers it, Anne. And the next question comes from Paco Suarez from Scotiabank. Paco, are you there? Maybe I will move on then. The next question comes from Jarell Gilotti from Goldman Sachs.

Thank you for taking my question. So I wanted to get a better sense of how you view the rebuilding effort for the LA area following the unfortunate wildfires earlier this year do you have any estimates about how much capex could take place over the next few years and how much of it could be related to building materials in a quick follow-up on the answer question i didn't quite understand what what was the the key driver for aggregate's uh demand uh aggregate's uh forecast to go down in 2025 in the us thank you yeah lucy do you want to take that uh sure um sorry i was I was on mute and talking to it.

So just going back to the aggregates question, we have a couple quarries that are approaching end of life, which is very normal in an aggregate cycle. And what you would like to do is have new quarries that come online to replace those, but sometimes you can't always do that in a timely manner. Our expectation at the moment is that we have a couple quarries that are going to be closing um because they're at end of life so we won't have that production in the early part of next year and again you know just reminding everyone that our strategy in the united states is to continue to boost our aggregates resources and obviously this has to be very local in nature but we are looking at opportunities to replace these aggregates that are um that are depleting okay did did that was i clear yeah yeah so this is more uh uh supply land demand yes correct okay and the first part of your question if you could remind me i'm sorry i was so focused on the ags now i've forgotten the first part right just wanted to get a sense of how you viewed the rebuilding effort in nla uh la wildfires earlier uh look you know our focus in the case of LA at the moment is obviously on the immediate crisis and the fires aren't out there. So, you know, we have been focused on making sure that our employees are safe, that they themselves have housing. And we have had a couple that I believe have been at least temporarily displaced and also aiding our community as well. There has been a lot of destruction i think that there have been 12 000 um residents or houses that have been you know destroyed in this process just to give you some sense in california 50 000 homes typically are built each year so you know you can see that that will be quite impactful going forward but um you know at the moment again we're focused on the immediate crisis and you know we'll think about what we can do to help with sustainable construction going forward um when the government and when our customers are ready to have that discussion but they definitely aren't there yet thank you okay i think we have time for one last question and the last question comes from danielle sesson from itau danielle unfortunately danielle has retracted their question Okay, then I think we have time for one last question from Yassine Tawiri from OnField. Yassine?

Yes, good morning and congratulations for the very resilient results. I would just have a question about, I remember in your CEMEX day, you were mentioning about the sum of the parts in CEMEX and the big mismatch between the valuation of peers and your valuation. And when I look at the past five, 10 years, you've done a fantastic job at leveraging the business, becoming investment grade, and finding a trajectory for growth. What do you think the market is missing when you look at your share price today? And is there anything that you can do to convince investors in the equity story of CIMEX?

Yes. Hi, Yasin. Thank you very much for your question. And And look, I, you know, we're obviously very disappointed at that current valuation of our share, you know, clearly and have been for a while. You know, we think that probably the biggest contributor to that, especially, you know, since the first quarter of 24, has been kind of the expectations of what's likely to happen in Mexico more important than anything else. And, you know, obviously in a transition year, you have, you know, demand issues, you have currency volatility issues, of course, which we have suffered from, especially in the last couple of quarters. So, you know, I think the market is probably going to wait to see how that normalizes over time. We're optimistic about that. clearly deleveraging is going to continue to probably take place. I mean, I don't know if you looked at the numbers, but when I take a look at where we are in terms of our investment grade ratings versus our peers and the leverage levels that we are at versus our peers, we have a potential, definitely potential upside in continuing to deleverage. And as I mentioned in one of the questions earlier, our interest expense, when you consider everything, meaning including the coupons that we pay on our subordinated notes, is probably close to 20 plus percent of our EBITDA. And that's more than double than our peers. And that's a huge number of capital, of free cash that can be invested in growth or can be returned to shareholders at the end of the day. And I think that's one area that perhaps either the market is not yet paying us for or is not discounting that is also probably going to happen over the next couple of years. I also think that, you know, there's definitely a discount that is being given by the market today in terms of valuation for, you know, for markets like Mexico compared to the U.S. I mean, on a risk adjusted basis, I think that's and that's something that will take time. I mean, I think the Mexican business has demonstrated phenomenal resilience. And I think that as we continue to deliver as a company and as a macroeconomy and as there's more integration between Mexico and the U.S., I think the value and the risk adjustment to the earnings coming out of our U.S. business, out of our Mexican business, is going to get higher. And that's when we believe that we will start seeing, you know, I don't want to talk from an investor perspective, but that's when we should see a re-rating on valuations of those earnings. What can we do in the interim is very simple, frankly, is continue to focus on doing the great things that we can do more of and taking a look at the, and I know it sounds like motherhood and apple pie, but taking a look at some of the upsides, which as you heard from our cost containment effort program, which we started last year, I mean, that is also going to be an important contributor to growth going forward. Again, we're not expecting the market to pay us for it immediately, but certainly that's something that also is going to translate to growth. The other thing that is also very important for everybody to realize is that over the last three years um we had a headwind of volumes at the level that is close to 750 million dollars okay for a variety of of reasons now i'm not i'm not saying here that we're going to necessarily recover all the 750 but clearly there is a natural tendency or should be a natural tendency of recovering a big chunk of that over the next you know couple of years at least and uh so when When you add all of those things together, and us delivering, of course, I mean, we need to continue to deliver quarter after quarter. I believe the market will see the attractiveness of the earnings that we can deliver. And hopefully, our valuation will be more realistic and aligned with our expectations going forward. I hope that answers your question, Yasin. I don't know if there's a, yeah. Thank you, Yassim. Thank you so much.

Thank you, Yassim.

We appreciate you joining us today for our fourth quarter results. We hope you'll come back again for first quarter 2025 webcast on April 28th. And if you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to the IR team. Many thanks.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the presentation. you may now disconnect. Good day.