Excelerate Energy, Inc DEF 14A, filed Apr 16, 2026
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE)
About this DEF 14A
Excelerate Energy, Inc filed this DEF 14A on April 16, 2026.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ |
No fee required |
☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials |
☐ |
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
Excelerate Energy, Inc.
2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6
The Woodlands, Texas 77381
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
June 4, 2026
9:00 AM Central Time
www.proxydocs.com/EE
To Our Stockholders:
We are pleased to invite you to attend the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Excelerate Energy, Inc. (“Excelerate” or the “Company”) on Thursday, June 4, 2026 at 9:00 AM Central Time, online via live audio webcast by visiting www.proxydocs.com/EE (the “Annual Meeting”) for the following purposes:
The Company’s board of directors has determined to hold the Annual Meeting virtually. We believe that this is the right choice for Excelerate as it provides expanded stockholder access regardless of the location of the Annual Meeting or resources available to stockholders, may improve communications, and allows the participants to attend the Annual Meeting conveniently from any location.
Holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock (together, “Common Stock”) are entitled to one vote for each such share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock will vote together as a single class on all matters presented to our stockholders for their vote or approval, except as otherwise required by applicable law or otherwise provided in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Stockholders are not permitted to cumulate votes with respect to the election of directors. Only stockholders of record of our Common Stock as of the close of business on April 7, 2026 are entitled to notice of, and, as described in this paragraph, to vote at, the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are providing access to our proxy materials online under the SEC’s “notice and access” rules. As a result, unless you previously requested electronic or paper delivery on an ongoing basis, we are mailing to our stockholders a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) instead of a paper copy of the proxy statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (the “Annual Report”) and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card (together, the “proxy materials”). The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials online. The Notice also contains instructions on how stockholders can receive a paper copy of our proxy materials and how to vote your shares. This process allows us to expedite our stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the costs of printing and mailing the proxy materials and reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. If you received the Notice, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. If you elect and request to receive a paper copy, our proxy materials will be mailed to you. The Notice is first being mailed, and the proxy materials are first being made available, to our stockholders on or about April 16, 2026.
All stockholders of record as of the record date are cordially invited to attend our Annual Meeting, conducted virtually via live audio webcast at www.proxydocs.com/EE. The Company has endeavored to provide stockholders attending the Annual Meeting with the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.proxydocs.com/EE. You will also be able to vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting.
To attend the Annual Meeting, vote, submit questions, or view the list of registered stockholders during the Annual Meeting, stockholders of record will be required to register at www.proxydocs.com/EE using their 12-digit control number included on their proxy card or Notice. Beneficial owners should review the proxy materials and their voting instruction form or Notice for how to vote in advance of, and how to participate in, the Annual Meeting. Specifically, if you are a beneficial owner and your voting instruction form or the Notice does not indicate that you may vote the shares through the http://www.proxypush.com/EE website, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee (preferably at least five days before the Annual Meeting) and obtain a “legal proxy” (which will contain a 12-digit control number that will allow you to attend, participate in, or vote at the Annual Meeting). When accessing our Annual Meeting, please allow ample time for online check-in, which will begin at 8:54 AM Central Time on Thursday, June 4, 2026. On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you experience technical difficulties either during the check-in process or during the Annual Meeting, please call 888-491-1002. For additional details, see “—How can I attend, participate in and vote at the Annual Meeting online?” in the “Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting” section below. This proxy statement provides detailed information about the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to read this proxy statement carefully and in its entirety.
Your vote is important. Regardless of whether you participate in the Annual Meeting, we hope you vote as soon as possible. You may vote online or by phone, or, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may submit your proxy or voting instruction card for the annual meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy or voting instruction card in the pre-addressed envelope provided. Voting online or by phone, written proxy or voting instruction card ensures your representation at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether you attend our virtual Annual Meeting online.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Steven M. Kobos
President and Chief Executive Officer
The Woodlands, Texas
April 16, 2026
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON June 4, 2026 |
The Notice, the proxy statement and the Company’s Annual Report are available at www.proxydocs.com/EE. |
PROXY SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider in voting your shares. Please read the complete proxy statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 carefully before voting.
Meeting Information
|
|
|
Date: |
|
Thursday, June 4, 2026 |
Time: |
|
9:00 AM Central Time |
Virtual Meeting: |
|
www.proxydocs.com/EE |
Record Date: |
|
April 7, 2026
|
How to Vote
Your vote is important. You may vote your shares in advance of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders via the Internet, by telephone or by mail, or during the meeting by attending and voting electronically. Please refer to the section “How do I vote?” on page 48 for detailed voting instructions. If you vote via the Internet, by telephone or plan to vote electronically during the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, you do not need to mail in a proxy card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
INTERNET |
|
TELEPHONE |
|
|
To vote before the meeting, visit www.proxypush.com/EE. To vote at the meeting, visit www.proxydocs.com/EE. You will need the control number printed on your notice, proxy card or voting instruction form. |
|
Dial toll-free (866-625-7841) or the telephone number on your voting instruction form. You will need the control number printed on your notice, proxy card or voting instruction form. |
|
If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, send your completed and signed proxy card or voting instruction form using the enclosed postage-paid envelope. |
We first began sending our stockholders a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, and made our proxy materials available, on or about April 16, 2026.
Voting Matters
Proposals
|
|
|
PROPOSAL #1 |
|
To elect the seven director nominees named in the proxy statement as directors of the Company, each to serve for a one-year term and until his |
Director Election |
|
or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, removal, retirement or disqualification (Proposal 1). ✓ Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR ALL” of the director nominees. |
|
|
|
PROPOSAL #2 |
|
To approve, on a non-binding and advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 2). |
Say-on-Pay |
|
✓ Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” approval, on a non-binding and advisory basis, of the 2025 compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL #3 |
|
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year |
Auditor Ratification |
|
ending December 31, 2026 (Proposal 3). ✓ Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. |
Board Nominees
Name |
Age |
Director Since |
Occupation |
Independent |
Committee Memberships |
Other Public Boards |
Nisha D. Biswal |
57 |
2025 |
Partner at The Asia Group |
Yes |
AC |
None |
Deborah L. Byers |
64 |
2022 |
Former Partner of Ernst & Young LLP |
Yes |
AC (Chairperson)† |
Kinetik Holdings Inc., |
Paul T. Hanrahan |
68 |
2022 |
Chairperson of Cubico Sustainable Investments, Former Chief Executive Officer and a director of The AES Corporation and former Interim Chief Executive Officer and a director of Hygo Energy Transitions Ltd. |
Yes |
AC† |
None |
Steven M. Kobos |
61 |
2021 |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Excelerate Energy, Inc. |
|
None |
None |
Don P. Millican |
73 |
2022 |
Former Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser-Francis Oil Company |
|
None |
None |
Tyler D. Todd |
38 |
2024 |
Senior Vice President of Business Development at Kaiser-Francis Oil Company |
|
CC |
None |
Robert A. Waldo |
50 |
2022 |
President of Kaiser-Francis Oil Company |
|
CC |
BOK Financial Corporation |
AC: Audit Committee
CC: Compensation Committee
NCGC: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
† Audit Committee Financial Expert
Fiscal 2025 Financial Performance Highlights
*Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure included as a supplemental disclosure because we believe it is a useful indicator of our operating performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, accretion, non-cash long-term incentive compensation expense and items such as charges and non-recurring expenses that management does not consider as part of assessing ongoing operating performance. We adjust net income for the items listed above to arrive at Adjusted EBITDA because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within our industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indicator of our operating performance or liquidity. This measure has limitations as certain excluded items are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets, none of which are components of Adjusted EBITDA. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. Our computations of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. For the foregoing reasons, Adjusted EBITDA has significant limitations that affect its use as an indicator of our profitability and valuation, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information. For reconciliation to Net Income, see Item 7 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Procedures for Recommending Individuals to Serve as Directors |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Insider Trading Policy and Prohibitions and Restrictions on Hedging and Pledging Transactions |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 2 —NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|||
17 |
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
33 |
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Procedures for Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Submission of Stockholder Proposals for the 2027 Annual Meeting |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
51 |
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements and Website References
This document includes forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, concerning expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding our environmental and other sustainability plans and goals, and the inclusion of such statements or references to “materiality” (for sustainability and corporate responsibility purposes) is not an indication that these contents are necessarily material to investors or required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC. Although we believe that the expectations and assumptions reflected in these statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties, including the risk factors that we identify in our SEC filings, and actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements. We undertake no duty to update publicly any forward-looking statement that we may make, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable law, regulation or other competent legal authority. In addition, our sustainability initiatives are aspirational and may change. Statements regarding our goals are not guarantees or promises that they will be met. Website references throughout this document are provided for convenience only, and the content on the referenced websites is not incorporated by reference into this document.
ii
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Status as a Controlled Company
As of April 7, 2026, George B. Kaiser (“Kaiser”), through his ownership of Excelerate Energy Holdings, LLC (“EE Holdings”), controls approximately 71.9% of the voting power of our outstanding Common Stock. So long as Kaiser controls a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting power, he will thereby control the outcome of matters submitted to a stockholder vote. As a result of the voting power currently controlled by Kaiser, we qualify as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power with respect to director elections is held by another person or group of persons acting together is a “controlled company.” Consistent with this, we have elected not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that (i) a majority of our board of directors must consist of independent directors, (ii) the nominating and governance committee must be composed entirely of independent directors, and (iii) the compensation committee must be composed entirely of independent directors. We intend to rely on all of the controlled company exemptions, and, unless consented to otherwise by Kaiser, will be required to do so under the Stockholder’s Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2022, by and among the Company, Excelerate Energy Limited Partnership (“EELP”) and EE Holdings, as amended (the “Stockholder’s Agreement”), for so long as we remain a controlled company. For details, see “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Related Person Transactions—Transactions in Connection with our Reorganization and Initial Public Offering—Stockholder’s Agreement” below. Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements. If at any time we cease to be a controlled company, we will take all action necessary to comply with SEC rules and regulations and the NYSE rules, including appointing a majority of independent directors to our board of directors (our “board” or our “board of directors”) and ensuring that we have a nominating and corporate governance committee and compensation committee each composed entirely of independent directors, subject to the permitted “phase-in” periods.
Composition of our Board of Directors
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors. In accordance with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, the number of directors on our board will be determined from time to time by the board of directors within the range included in the amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Our board of directors currently consists of seven members with Mr. Millican serving as chairperson.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that currently our board of directors is subject to annual elections. Each director holds office until the next annual meeting of our stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. However, from and after such time when EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) ceases to own at least 40% of the combined voting power of our then-outstanding capital stock entitled to vote generally in director elections (which we refer to as the Trigger Date), the board of directors will be divided into three classes of directors, with staggered three-year terms. For details, see “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Related Person Transactions—Transactions in Connection with our Reorganization and Initial Public Offering—Stockholder’s Agreement” below.
In addition, subject to the board’s fiduciary duties, as long as certain ownership thresholds are satisfied, the Stockholder’s Agreement gives EE Holdings the right to designate the chairperson of our board of directors and a certain number of nominees for election to our board of directors and, also subject to listing exchange requirements, each committee thereof. Additionally, EE Holdings has certain observer rights as long as EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) has the right to designate director-designees under the Stockholder’s Agreement. For details, see “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Related Person Transactions—Transactions in Connection with our Reorganization and Initial Public Offering—Stockholder’s Agreement” below.
Pursuant to the Stockholder’s Agreement, EE Holdings has nominated Steven M. Kobos, Don P. Millican, Tyler D. Todd, and Robert A. Waldo as its designees to serve on our board. The board of directors evaluated the designees and determined that they are qualified to serve on the board and that it is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders to nominate them for election at the annual meeting.
1
The following table sets forth information with respect to our directors as of the record date:
Name |
Age |
Director |
Position at the Company |
Committee Membership |
||
|
|
|
|
AC |
CC |
NCGC |
Nisha D. Biswal |
57 |
2025 |
Director |
M* |
|
C |
Deborah L. Byers |
64 |
2022 |
Director |
C*† |
|
|
Paul T. Hanrahan |
68 |
2022 |
Director |
M*† |
C |
|
Steven M. Kobos |
61 |
2021 |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
Don P. Millican |
73 |
2022 |
Director and Chairperson |
|
|
|
Tyler D. Todd |
38 |
2024 |
Director |
|
M |
M |
Robert A. Waldo |
50 |
2022 |
Director |
|
M |
M |
AC: Audit Committee CC: Compensation Committee NCGC: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
|
M – Member C – Chairperson |
* Independent Director
† Audit Committee Financial Expert
2
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended, and our board has approved, Nisha D. Biswal, Deborah L. Byers, Paul T. Hanrahan, Steven M. Kobos, Don P. Millican, Tyler D. Todd, and Robert A. Waldo as nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting. If elected at the Annual Meeting, each nominee will serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or, if sooner, until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal. Information concerning these nominees and other continuing directors appears under “Nominees for Director” below. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unavailable or, if elected, will decline to serve. If any nominee becomes unable or unwilling to stand for election as a director, proxies will be voted for any substitute as designated by our board, or alternatively, our board may leave a vacancy on our board or reduce the size of our board.
Each director is elected by a plurality of the votes cast. “Plurality” means that the seven nominees who receive the largest number of votes cast “For” such nominees are elected as directors. Stockholders may vote “For All,” “Withhold All,” or “For All Except” with respect to the nominees named in this Proposal 1. Any shares voted “Withhold All” and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast for the foregoing purpose and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL |
|
OUR BOARD, UPON RECOMMENDATION OF OUR NOMINATING AND |
3
Nominees for Director
The names of the nominees for director, their ages as of the record date, principal occupations, employment and other public company board service during at least the last five years, periods of service as a director of the Company, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nisha D. Biswal |
|
Age: 57 |
|
Director |
|
Committees: AC, NCGC (Chairperson) |
|
|
|
|
Background
Nisha D. Biswal joined Excelerate’s board of directors in January 2025. Ms. Biswal is a Partner at The Asia Group, an international strategic advisory firm, where she oversees the Middle East and South Asia practice areas as well as the Energy and Sustainability practice areas. Ms. Biswal previously served as the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (“DFC”), a development finance institution and agency of the United States federal government, a position she held from August 2023 through January 2025. In her position with DFC, Ms. Biswal oversaw operations and strategy supporting private-sector-led global projects in energy, infrastructure, health, agriculture, and climate and also ensured the adequacy of DFC’s risk management and environmental and social compliance measures. From October 2017 to August 2023, Ms. Biswal was the Senior Vice President, International Strategy & Global Initiatives for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In her position with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Ms. Biswal led the U.S.-India Business Council and U.S.-Bangladesh Business Council, oversaw teams across multiple regions and managed cross-cutting measures. From 2013 to 2017, Ms. Biswal was the Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs with the U.S. Department of State, and from 2010 to 2013, Ms. Biswal was the Assistant Administrator for Asia for the U.S. Agency for International Development. Ms. Biswal previously served as a director on the Board of two not-for-profit organizations, the National Democratic Institute (January 2022 to June 2023) and the Institute for Sustainable Communities (March 2017 to February 2021). Ms. Biswal holds a Bachelor of Arts, Arts & Sciences from the University of Virginia.
Qualifications and Skills
Her deep foreign policy and international experience in both the governmental and private sectors qualifies her to serve on our board of directors.
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deborah L. Byers |
|
Age: 64 |
|
Director |
|
Committees: AC (Chairperson) |
|
|
|
|
Background
Deborah L. Byers joined Excelerate’s board of directors in July 2022. Ms. Byers retired as a Partner from Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), a multinational professional services partnership on July 1, 2022, after 36 years of service in Public Accounting, while holding multiple leadership roles. From July 2018 until her retirement, she was EY’s Americas Industry Leader overseeing the market and growth strategy across its primary industry markets including Energy, Industrials & Automotive, Consumer, Technology, Telecom, Media & Entertainment, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Real Estate, Private Equity, and Government. Ms. Byers was EY’s Houston Office Managing Partner and U.S. Energy Leader from July 2013 to July 2018 and Managing Partner of the Southwest Region Strategy & Transactions business unit from July 2008 to July 2013. In these roles, she was a leader in the global energy market and worked with corporations and investment funds in all phases of energy investment across the sector. She was admitted to the EY Partnership in October 1997 after joining the firm in July 1986. Ms. Byers has served as a director of Kinetik Holdings Inc., a midstream energy company, since July 2022, and of DTE, a public utility since May 2023. She previously served as a director of Civitas Resources, Inc., an upstream energy company, from February 2023 to Q1 2026. She also serves as a Senior Advisor to Veriten, an energy research and strategy firm. Ms. Byers holds a BBA from Baylor University and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Qualifications and Skills
Her financial expertise and deep sector knowledge in global energy markets and systems qualify her to serve on our board of directors.
|
|
|
||||
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul T. Hanrahan |
|
Age: 68 |
|
Director |
|
Committees: AC, CC (Chairperson) |
|
|
|
|
Background
Paul T. Hanrahan joined Excelerate’s board of directors in April 2022. Mr. Hanrahan serves as the Chairman of Cubico Sustainable Investments, a privately-owned world leader in providing renewable energy. Mr. Hanrahan previously served as Interim Chief Executive Officer and a director of Hygo Energy Transitions Ltd., a company that developed and operated integrated LNG-to-Power facilities globally, from October 2020 until its acquisition by New Fortress Energy in April 2021. Mr. Hanrahan served as the Chief Executive Officer of Globeleq Advisors Limited, an independent power producer operating and developing power projects in Africa, from September 2017 to December 2019. Mr. Hanrahan has served on Globeleq’s board of directors since January 2020. Previously, Mr. Hanrahan served as the Chief Executive Officer of American Capital Energy & Infrastructure Management, LLC, an investment company formed to raise, invest and manage funds in the energy and infrastructure industries, from September 2012 until its acquisition by Ares Capital Corporation in December 2016. Mr. Hanrahan served as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of The AES Corporation, an independent power producer, from June 2002 to September 2011. Mr. Hanrahan served as a director of Ingredion Inc. from March 2006 to October 2023. Mr. Hanrahan served as a director of BMR Energy, owned by Virgin, until BMR Energy was sold in December 2024, and Mr. Hanrahan serves as a board member for the Infrastructure Acceleration Fund (Africa 50). Mr. Hanrahan earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy and a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard Business School.
Qualifications and Skills
His extensive executive and public company board experience and knowledge of the industry qualify him to serve on our board of directors.
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Kobos |
|
Age: 61 |
|
Director |
|
Committees: None |
|
|
|
|
Background
Steven M. Kobos has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of EELP since March 2018 and President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Excelerate since September 2021. Prior to his current role, Mr. Kobos served as a board member of EELP since 2017 and its counsel for the previous 11 years. Prior to joining EELP, Mr. Kobos formally supported our company as Managing Counsel with primary legal responsibility for EELP global projects, while also employed by Frederic Dorwart, Lawyers PLLC. Mr. Kobos earned a bachelor’s degree and Juris Doctorate from the University of Oklahoma.
Qualifications and Skills
His in-depth knowledge of the issues, challenges and opportunities relevant to the Company and his expertise managing complex energy and infrastructure development projects qualify him to serve on our board of directors.
|
|
|
||||
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don P. Millican |
|
Age: 73 |
|
Director |
|
Committees: None |
|
|
|
|
Background
Don P. Millican has served as a member of the board of directors of EELP since 2008 and as a director of Excelerate since April 2022. Until his retirement in July 2024, Mr. Millican served as the Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser-Francis Oil Company (“Kaiser-Francis”), an upstream oil and gas company owned by Kaiser, our controlling stockholder, and was also affiliated with other Kaiser-controlled entities in various senior capacities. Prior to Kaiser-Francis, Mr. Millican was a partner in the international accounting firm of Ernst & Young, LLP between 1982 and 2003. Mr. Millican previously served as Chief Financial Officer of EELP from December 2003 to May 2008. Since October 2024, Mr. Millican has served on the Board of Directors of the George Kaiser Family Foundation. Mr. Millican is engaged in many civic activities, having served on the board of Community Action Project, Tulsa Educare, Inc., Neighbor for Neighbor, Oklahoma Policy Institute, Tulsa Neighborhood Networks and Crossover Community Impact. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of Oklahoma Christian University, having formerly served as Chairman. Mr. Millican serves as a director of Memjet, Ltd. and Memjet Home and Office, Inc. He is a Certified Public Accountant. He earned a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of North Texas.
Qualifications and Skills
His executive leadership experience in the oil and gas industry, his broad perspective gained from involvement in diverse industries and his knowledge of our business qualify him to serve on our board of directors.
|
|
|
||||
Tyler D. Todd |
|
Age: 38 |
|
Director |
|
Committees: CC, NCGC |
|
|
|
|
Background
Tyler D. Todd joined Excelerate’s board of directors in October 2024. Since 2023, Mr. Todd has served as Senior Vice President of Business Development at Kaiser-Francis and is also affiliated with other Kaiser-controlled entities in various senior capacities. From 2019 to 2023, Mr. Todd served as the Director of Business Development for Kaiser-Francis, and from 2015 to 2019, Mr. Todd served as an Associate in Business Development for Kaiser-Francis. Prior to joining Kaiser-Francis, Mr. Todd worked at WPX Energy where he held various petroleum engineering roles. Mr. Todd currently serves as a member of the industry advisory board for the Mewbourne School of Petroleum & Geologic Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Todd earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Oklahoma and a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard Business School.
Qualifications and Skills
His executive experience in the oil and gas industry along with his experience in acquisition and divestiture transactions qualify him to serve on our board of directors.
|
|
|
||||
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. Waldo |
|
Age: 50 |
|
Director |
|
Committees: CC, NCGC |
|
|
|
|
Background
Robert A. Waldo has served as a member of the board of directors of EELP since 2014 and as a director of Excelerate since April 2022. Since 2016, Mr. Waldo has served as the President of Kaiser-Francis, and is also affiliated with other Kaiser-controlled entities in various senior capacities. From 2012 to 2015, Mr. Waldo was the Executive Vice President of Kaiser-Francis. Mr. Waldo has worked at Kaiser-Francis in various roles since 2004 and, in addition to the upstream oil and gas business, he is involved in various investment activities of Mr. Kaiser, including Cactus Drilling and multiple private and public equity investments. In April 2025, Mr. Waldo was elected to serve as a director of BOK Financial Corporation. Mr. Waldo served as a director of StepStone Group Inc. (including its predecessor) from 2007 to 2021. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Waldo worked as an associate at Evercore Partners, where he focused on mergers and acquisitions and private equity investments, and from 1998 to 2000, he was an analyst in the investment banking division of Merrill Lynch. Mr. Waldo earned a bachelor’s degree from Harvard University and a master’s degree in business administration from Duke University.
Qualifications and Skills
His extensive experience in the oil and gas industry and private equity investments qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.
|
|
|
||||
Director Independence
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our board have conducted their annual review of the independence of each director nominee under the applicable NYSE and SEC independence standards. Based upon the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and our board’s own review and assessment, our board has affirmatively determined in its business judgment that each of Nisha D. Biswal, Deborah L. Byers, and Paul T. Hanrahan is “independent” as defined under the NYSE rules and Rule 10A-3 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Board also previously determined that Carolyn J. Burke, who served as director until January 21, 2025, was independent during the period that she served as director.
Board Leadership Structure
We do not have a policy regarding whether the role of the chairperson of the board and chief executive officer should be separate or combined, and our board of directors believes that we should maintain the flexibility to select the chairperson and chief executive officer and reorganize the leadership structure, from time to time, based on criteria that are in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. The board believes that presently it is in the best interests of the Company to separate the roles of the chairperson of the board and chief executive officer. In accordance with the Stockholder’s Agreement, the board of directors determined that Don P. Millican should serve as chairperson of the board. Our board of directors believes its administration of its risk oversight function has not affected its leadership structure.
Executive Sessions
In order to promote open discussion among non-management directors, our board holds executive sessions of non-management directors at least quarterly. These executive sessions are chaired by the chairperson of the board. In addition, as required under the NYSE rules, the board holds an executive session of independent directors at least once per year. In 2025 our independent directors met in executive session on a quarterly basis.
Board Qualifications
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews, and recommends to our board, the skills, experience, characteristics and other criteria for identifying and evaluating directors. The board expects directors to be open and forthright, to develop a deep understanding of the Company’s business, to understand their role in furthering the Company’s mission, values and commitment to environmental, social and governance principles, and to exercise sound judgment in fulfilling their oversight responsibilities. Directors should embrace the Company’s values and culture and should possess the highest levels of integrity.
The board considers a variety of occupational and personal backgrounds, perspectives and viewpoints among its members and expects that its members will have a range of skills and expertise sufficient to provide guidance and oversight with respect to the Company’s strategy and operations. The board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also actively seek to achieve an array of occupational and personal backgrounds and viewpoints on the board, including with respect to demographics such as backgrounds, perspectives and experiences. As part of the search process for each new director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee actively seeks out qualified diverse candidates to expand the pool from which Board nominees are ultimately chosen based on merit.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the qualifications of director candidates and incumbent directors in light of the criteria approved by our board and recommends the Company’s candidates to our board for election by the Company’s stockholders at the stockholders’ annual meeting. We also assess qualifications and characteristics of our directors as part of our board’s annual self-evaluation process. We believe our board is well positioned to provide effective oversight and strategic advice to our management.
7
Key skills, qualifications, and attributes of our director nominees include, but are not limited to:
|
Biswal |
Byers |
Hanrahan |
Kobos |
Millican |
Todd |
Waldo |
Senior Executive Leadership |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Public Company Experience |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Energy Industry Expertise |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Operational / Safety Expertise |
|
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Legal / Regulatory / Government Relations |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
|
Strategy / M&A |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Financial / Accounting |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Risk Management |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
Environment / Sustainability |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
Information Technology and Systems |
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
|
Geopolitical Knowledge |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
Procedures for Recommending Individuals to Serve as Directors
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers director candidates recommended by our stockholders. Any stockholder who wishes to propose director nominees for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, but does not wish to present such proposal at the Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, may do so at any time by directing a description of each nominee’s name and qualifications for board membership to the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o our Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Excelerate Energy, Inc., 2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6, The Woodlands, Texas 77381. The recommendation should contain all of the information regarding the nominee under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, including, among other things, the particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of the nominee that, in light of our business and structure, led to the stockholder’s conclusion that the nominee should serve on the board, and any additional requirements included in the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Bylaws relating to director nominations brought before an annual meeting. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates any nominee proposed by stockholders in the same manner in which it evaluates other nominees.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. These committees are each described below. Each of our board’s committees acts under a written charter, which was adopted and approved by our board of directors. Copies of the committees’ charters are available on our website at https://ir.excelerateenergy.com/governance/governance-documents.
Committee Membership; Meetings and Attendance
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025:
8
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, no incumbent director attended fewer than 75% of the meetings of our board of directors and the respective committees of which he or she was a member held during the period such incumbent director was a director.
Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting absent unusual circumstances. All seven of our then-sitting directors attended the 2025 Annual Meeting.
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee consists of Nisha D. Biswal, Deborah L. Byers, and Paul T. Hanrahan. Ms. Byers serves as the chairperson of the Audit Committee. Each of Ms. Biswal, Ms. Byers, and Mr. Hanrahan qualifies as an “independent” director for purposes of the SEC and NYSE independence rules that are applicable to audit committee members. Ms. Biswal, Ms. Byers, and Mr. Hanrahan have each been determined by the board of directors to be financially literate and have sufficient financial experience and ability to discharge their responsibilities. In addition, each of Ms. Byers and Mr. Hanrahan qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. Our Audit Committee, among other things, has responsibility for:
Compensation Committee
Our Compensation Committee consists of Paul T. Hanrahan, Tyler D. Todd and Robert A. Waldo. Mr. Hanrahan serves as the chairperson of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Hanrahan qualifies as an “independent” director for purposes of the SEC and NYSE independence rules that are applicable to compensation committee members. As a controlled company, we rely upon the exemption from the NYSE requirement that we have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. Our Compensation Committee, among other things, has responsibility for:
9
The Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to one or more subcommittees, members of the Board, the chairperson of the Compensation Committee or officers of the Company, to the extent permitted by law, when it deems appropriate and in the best interests of the Company.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Nisha D. Biswal, Tyler D. Todd and Robert A. Waldo. Ms. Biswal serves as the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Biswal qualifies as an “independent” director for purposes of the NYSE independence rules that are applicable to board members. As a controlled company, we rely upon the exemption from the NYSE requirement that we have a nominating and corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, among other things, has responsibility for:
Risk Oversight
Our board of directors believes that risk management is an important part of establishing, updating and executing on our business strategy. Our board of directors, as a whole and at the committee level, has oversight responsibility relating to risks that could affect our corporate strategy, business objectives, compliance, operations and financial condition and performance. Our board of directors focuses its oversight on the most significant risks facing us and on its processes to identify, prioritize, assess, manage and mitigate those risks. Our board of directors and its committees receive regular reports from members of our senior management on areas of material risk to us, including strategic, operational, financial, legal and regulatory risks. While our board of directors has an oversight role, management is principally tasked with direct responsibility for management and assessment of risks and the implementation of processes and controls to mitigate their effects on us.
While our board is ultimately responsible for the risk oversight of our Company, our Audit Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing processes regarding management and mitigation of the risks facing our Company, including major financial, cybersecurity and control risks, and oversight of the measures initiated by management to monitor and control such risks and the process by which our board of directors is informed about such risks. Our Audit Committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and considers and approves or disapproves any related person transactions. Our Compensation Committee has responsibility to review the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices applicable to all employees and evaluate policies and practices that could mitigate any such risks. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has responsibility to review risks relating to our corporate governance practices. These committees provide regular reports on our risk management practices to our full board, as necessary. Our board believes that the Company’s current leadership structure supports its risk oversight function.
Among other things, our Audit Committee is also responsible for the oversight of risks from cybersecurity threats and the process by which our board is informed about such risks. Our Chief Information Officer reports to the Audit Committee on a periodic basis on data protection and cybersecurity matters. In addition, our Audit Committee receives regular reports on our Company’s cyber risks, exposures and threats, and mitigation plans directly from our information technology department. Our Audit Committee updates our board on such matters at least annually and more frequently as needed. Our cybersecurity program aligns with industry standards, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework and the guidelines of the International Maritime Organization. We rely upon a multi-layered controls approach, including monitoring, security engineering, incident management and resiliency. The efficacy of our cybersecurity program is assessed through monitoring and the engagement of third-party experts. Our global information security team assesses cyber risks on an on-going basis and adjusts our program as needed. Our employees regularly participate in information security training and awareness campaigns designed to strengthen adoption of secure behaviors. For additional information, please refer to Section 1C of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
10
Stockholder Engagement
We respect and benefit from interactions with stockholders, prospective investors and institutional analysts. Our Investor Relations team coordinates these engagements, which include, but are not limited to, participation at investment conferences, quarterly earnings conference calls, one-on-one meetings and visits throughout the year as well as our annual stockholder meeting. These meetings often include participation by our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and/or functional business leaders. Topics generally focus on corporate performance, strategy, governance, market conditions and corporate responsibility issues.
Engagements with stockholders offer our management team an opportunity to solicit stockholder views and input, which in turn, is shared with our board of directors.
Our Principles of Corporate Governance codify our board of directors’ oversight of stockholder engagement and reflect their understanding of the critical role stockholder engagement plays in governance.
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Sustainability
We strive to operate our business in a responsible manner, incorporating social responsibility, environmental stewardship and transparent governance throughout our operations. This is consistent with our corporate values of stewardship, accountability, improvement and leadership in everything we do, everywhere we operate around the world. It also aligns with our business objectives to help bring cleaner and more accessible energy to global markets.
Our board of directors oversees our sustainability efforts, related strategic planning and risk management, policies, and procedures. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has oversight of our sustainability strategy and practices. This Committee receives regular updates on sustainability and corporate responsibility activities. At the operating level, sustainability responsibility resides with our Chief Executive Officer and is guided by a Sustainability steering committee, which includes, among others, our Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, and General Counsel. In addition, we have sustainability and corporate responsibility working teams who are responsible for implementing strategies in the areas of employee safety, business ethics, corporate social responsibility, greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions, air quality and regulatory reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We are continuing to develop our GHG inventory, enhancing our controls for annual emissions measurement and reporting, further integrating our sustainability and corporate responsibility strategy throughout our operations, and implementing new policies on Human Rights and Supplier Code of Conduct. Our sustainability and corporate responsibility strategy guides our efforts to operate responsibly, enabling us to deliver an essential service that is helping secure a sustainable future for all. We evaluate our sustainability and corporate responsibility matters through a structured materiality assessment process informed by the principles of double materiality. This process incorporates internal subject matter expertise, recognized external reference frameworks, and engagement with a broad range of relevant stakeholders, including senior leadership, members of the Board of Directors, investors, customers, think tanks, public organizations, suppliers and non-governmental entities. The assessment process enhances organizational awareness of sustainability related impacts, risks, and opportunities and supports management and Board oversight by informing enterprise risk management, strategic planning and disclosure readiness. We actively monitor developments in sustainability related regulations and reporting standards and consider how evolving requirements may inform future governance, risk management, and reporting practices. Through this process, we are able to prioritize sustainability and corporate responsibility focus areas, outlined below, where we can have the most impact:
Human Capital Resources
Our human capital is one of our most valuable assets. As of December 31, 2025, we had a global headcount of 1,046 colleagues, consisting of 348 full-time onshore employees and 698 seafarers. The seafarers and Belgium employees are represented by labor unions or covered under collective bargaining agreements.
We place a high premium on attracting, developing and retaining a talented and high-performing workforce. Our employees are expected to act with integrity, responsibility and compliance and uphold governance and ethics best practices, including adherence to an equal opportunity policy that prohibits discrimination in any form. We believe our employees’ commitment is fundamental to having a sustainable business. We offer our employees a variety of company-paid benefits, which we believe are competitive relative to others in our industry. Our onshore employees earn a base salary plus
11
an annual bonus (short term incentive plan) with targets aligned with organizational goals. Our seafarers earn salaries and other compensation commensurate with terms outlined in their collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
For over two decades, we have worked to provide safe, efficient and cost-effective LNG solutions, and we believe that our success has been in large part due to our employees’ commitment to excellence. Our core values of stewardship, accountability, improvement and leadership (“SAIL”) represent not only our beliefs in how we conduct our business but also how we engage our employees. We have worked to establish a corporate culture with a focus on creating a collaborative environment that fosters the personal intellectual growth of each of our employees.
We aim to create an environment where every team member feels valued and empowered to contribute their unique ideas and perspectives. As a U.S.-based company with global operations, we collaborate with a diverse range of colleagues, vendors, customers, partners and local communities. The collective sum of our employees’ individual differences, life experiences, knowledge, inventiveness, innovation, self-expression and talent has been an important driver of our success over the years.
Health, Safety & Environmental
Our health, safety and environmental function is responsible for maintaining the safety of all our employees, operations and assets as well as compliance with all applicable laws and regulations related to our environmental impact. We have a health, safety, security, environmental and quality policy, which is independently certified under the International Safety Management Code, an international standard for the safe management and operation of ships. In addition, we have training programs and tools tailored to both onshore and fleet personnel and positions. Safety performance is measured, monitored and audited on a regular basis.
Corporate Social Responsibility
We are invested in the communities and markets in which we operate. Our efforts to help improve the quality of life and resilience of these communities are focused on education, health, climate, and emergency relief. In 2025, we funded online learning opportunities for recent graduates and young professionals in Argentina, Bangladesh, and Brazil to earn digital certificates through Cornell University’s eCornell platform. In response to the devastation caused by the category 5 Hurricane Melissa, we funded several NGO partners, including Food for the Poor, Project C.U.R.E., and World Central Kitchen to deliver food, potable water, and humanitarian relief supplies to communities across Jamaica. We continued our support of U.S.-based charities 9/11 Day, Coast Guard Foundation, and YMCA of Greater Houston to enhance food security, health and wellness, and STEM education for local families and communities. The global Excelerate team also participated in World Cleanup Day, partnering with NGOs to remove litter and debris from beaches, parks, and coastal areas.
Communications with Directors
Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with our board, the chairperson of the board, the independent directors as a group, or any individual director may do so by sending an email to corporatesecretary@excelerateenergy.com or in writing, c/o our Executive Vice President and General Counsel at 2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6, The Woodlands, Texas 77381. Communications we receive that relate to accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters or securities law matters will be referred to the Audit Committee unless the communication is directed otherwise. You may communicate anonymously and/or confidentially. Each communication will be reviewed to determine whether it is appropriate for presentation to our board or the applicable director(s). The purpose of this screening is to allow our board (or the applicable individual director(s)) to avoid having to consider irrelevant or inappropriate communications (such as advertisements, solicitations, product inquiries or any offensive or otherwise inappropriate materials).
Code of Conduct and Ethics
Our board adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) relating to the conduct of our business by all of our employees, executive officers (including our principal executive officers, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer (or persons performing similar functions)), and directors. This Code satisfies the requirement that we have a “code of conduct” under the NYSE and SEC rules and is available on our website at https://excelerateenergy.com/our-values/. To the extent required under the listing rules and SEC rules, we intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of this Code, or waivers of such provisions, applicable to any of our executive officers or directors, on our website identified above.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our board also adopted principles of corporate governance to formalize its governance practices and serve as a flexible framework within which our board of directors and its committees operate. These guidelines cover a number of areas, including, among others, the role of our board of directors, board composition and leadership structure, director independence, director selection, qualification and election, director compensation, executive sessions, chief executive officer evaluation, succession planning, annual board assessments, board committees, director orientation and continuing education and board communications with stockholders. A copy of our corporate governance guidelines is posted on our website at https://ir.excelerateenergy.com/governance/governance-documents/.
12
Insider Trading Policy and Prohibitions and Restrictions on Hedging and Pledging Transactions
2025 Director Compensation
Mr. Kobos, as well as Don P. Millican, Tyler D. Todd and Robert A. Waldo, who are the directors affiliated with Kaiser, our controlling stockholder, do not receive additional compensation for their services on our board of directors. Our 2025 compensation program for independent, unaffiliated directors was comprised of the following elements.
Each director also receives reimbursement for reasonable travel and miscellaneous expenses incurred in attending meetings and activities of our board of directors and its committees.
Set forth below are details on the 2025 compensation earned or granted to each of the independent, unaffiliated directors who served during 2025.
Name |
Fees earned or paid in cash (1) |
Stock awards |
All Other Compensation (3) |
Total |
Nisha D. Biswal |
$77,083 |
$135,420 |
|
$212,503 |
Carolyn J. Burke |
$4,375 |
$0 |
$270,017 |
$274,392 |
Deborah L. Byers |
$98,000 |
$125,002 |
|
$223,002 |
Paul T. Hanrahan |
$99,806 |
$125,002 |
|
$224,807 |
Director Compensation Policy Changes
In 2026, the board of directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved an increase to the annual cash retainer, raising it to $90,000, an increase to the annual equity retainer to a grant date value of $140,000 and an increase to the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee chairperson retainers, raising such to $25,000 and $20,000, respectively. After reviewing both compensation reference group and survey data, such increases were approved to better align our director compensation package with our compensation reference group and industry practice. See “Compensation Reference Group and Survey Data” in our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below for additional information on our compensation reference group.
13
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following individuals constitute our executive officers:
Name |
Age* |
Position |
Steven M. Kobos |
61 |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Dana A. Armstrong |
54 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
David A. Liner |
53 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
Oliver L. Simpson |
44 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer |
Alisa Newman Hood |
51 |
Executive Vice President and General Counsel |
Amy Thompson Broussard |
49 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer |
Michael A. Bent |
59 |
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
* As of the proxy filing date.
The biography of Mr. Kobos appears above under “Nominees for Director.” Biographies of the remaining executive officers appear below:
Dana A. Armstrong has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of EELP since April 2020 and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Excelerate since September 2021. Prior to joining EELP, from September 2015 to April 2020, Ms. Armstrong served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Drilling International, a leading energy services provider and manufacturer. Before joining Scientific Drilling International, between 2007 and 2015, Ms. Armstrong served in various leadership roles at ION Geophysical, a global provider of technology-driven geophysical solutions including as the Vice President and Treasurer from 2012 to 2015. Prior to that, Ms. Armstrong served in various senior financial leadership roles at Thermo Fisher Scientific, a world leader in serving science. Ms. Armstrong serves as a director of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation. Ms. Armstrong earned a bachelor’s degree in accounting and a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Houston. She is also a licensed Certified Public Accountant.
David A. Liner has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Excelerate since January 2023. Previously, Mr. Liner served as Vice President of Operations and Maintenance of EELP from August 2021 through December 2022. Prior to joining EELP, Mr. Liner served in various leadership roles over his 20-year career at SeaRiver Maritime, Inc., a U.S. marine transportation company and wholly owned subsidiary of ExxonMobil. These roles included the Americas Freight Trading Manager (2021), Americas Crude & Feedstocks Manager (2020), Planning & Strategy Manager (2018-2020), and the Chief Commercial and Planning Officer for Qatar Gas Transport Company Ltd. (Nakilat) (on secondment from ExxonMobil) (2015-2018). Mr. Liner also served in various roles for SeaRiver Maritime Inc. and ExxonMobil Development Company from 2001 to 2015, as an engineer for BMT Designs & Planners, Inc. from 2000 to 2001, and as an engineer for the American Bureau of Shipping from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Liner holds a bachelor’s degree in Ocean Engineering from the Florida Institute of Technology.
Oliver L. Simpson has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer of Excelerate since November 2023. Mr. Simpson joined EELP in 2014 and has served in various roles, including as Vice President, Commercial of EELP from 2017 to 2023, where he was responsible for managing the commercial shipping business and supporting and executing a wide range of transactions on behalf of EELP. Prior to joining EELP in 2014, Mr. Simpson served in various roles at affiliates of Astrup Fearnley Group, an international ship brokering and consulting company, and was responsible for overseeing various roles in the LNG division, including the LNG chartering department. Between 2004 and 2008, Mr. Simpson served in various trading and risk positions within the Gas & Power division of Total Energies in London and Houston. Mr. Simpson earned a Master of Arts in Modern History from University of St. Andrews in Scotland.
Alisa Newman Hood has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of EELP since January 2021. Ms. Newman Hood has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Excelerate since September 2021. Previously, Ms. Newman Hood served as General Counsel at ARTIC, a Qatari real estate holding company, between September 2017 and April 2019; Akfel Commodities, the largest private importer of natural gas in Turkey, between August 2016 and September 2017; and Aluminium Bahrain B.S.C., traded on the London Stock Exchange and one of the world’s largest aluminium smelters, between December 2009 and October 2012. From 2012 to 2016, Ms. Newman Hood served as Senior Advisor to the U.S. Special Envoy for International Energy Affairs at the State Department. She began her legal career in the project finance and energy practice at White & Case LLP in New York and Washington. Ms. Newman Hood earned a bachelor’s degree from Brown University and a Juris Doctorate from Georgetown University Law Center, where she has been on the adjunct faculty teaching oil and gas law since 2007.
Amy Thompson Broussard has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of EELP since December 2020. Ms. Thompson Broussard has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Excelerate since September 2021. Prior to joining EELP between May 2018 and September 2020, Ms. Thompson Broussard served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Apergy Corporation, a leading oil and gas technology and services company, and was responsible for establishing the company’s human resources function, talent management processes, and executive compensation programs. Before that, between 2014 and 2018, Ms. Thompson Broussard served as Segment HR Vice President for Dover Energy, a segment of Dover Corporation, a diversified global manufacturer. Prior to that, between 1998 and 2014, she held various human resources roles within Baker Hughes, an international industrial service company and one of the world’s largest oil field services companies, and she served as a Human Resources Advisor for Oxy Oil and Gas, a hydrocarbon exploration company. Ms. Thompson Broussard earned a bachelor’s degree from Louisiana State University and a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Dallas.
Michael A. Bent has served as Vice President, Controller of EELP since May 2021 and Vice President, Controller of Excelerate since September 2021 and was appointed Chief Accounting Officer of Excelerate in January 2022. Prior to joining EELP, Mr. Bent served in various leadership positions at Exterran Corporation, a global systems and process company offering solutions in oil, gas, water and power markets, including as its Vice President Accounting, Tax and Treasurer, responsible for the company’s accounting function, from September 2019 to April 2021, its Vice President Tax and Treasurer from March 2017 to September 2019 and its Vice President Finance and Treasurer from November 2015 to March 2017.
14
Mr. Bent joined Exterran Corporation’s predecessor Exterran Holdings, Inc. (now Archrock Inc. and previously Hanover Compressor Company) in 2001 and served in various accounting and finance roles at the company. Prior to joining Exterran, Mr. Bent served as Alpha Technologies Group’s Corporate Controller. Mr. Bent has served as a director of Luzon LNG Terminals Inc. since 2023. He began his career in public accounting at Pannell Kerr Forster of Texas. He earned a bachelor’s degree in accounting and finance from Loyola University, New Orleans and is a licensed Certified Public Accountant.
15
PROPOSAL 2—NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with the Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, we are asking our stockholders to approve, on a non-binding and advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules. This proposal is commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote.
As described in detail in the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” section of this proxy statement, including the related tables and narrative, our compensation program is designed to attract, retain, incentivize and reward talented leaders with the skills and experience necessary to successfully execute on our business plan and objectives. We further believe that our compensation program aligns our executive’s incentives with those of our stockholders and provides pay levels commensurate with both individual and Company performance.
For the reasons discussed, the board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on a non-binding and advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure contained in this proxy statement.)”
The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory and is therefore not binding on us, our Compensation Committee or our board. However, our board and Compensation Committee values the opinions expressed by stockholders in their vote on this proposal and will review and consider the outcome of the stockholder vote when making future decisions regarding compensation for named executive officers. Our board’s current policy is to hold annual Say-on-Pay votes, and thus, we expect that we will conduct our next Say-On-Pay vote after the Annual Meeting at our 2027 annual meeting of stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING AND ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. |
16
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and design and each element of our executive compensation program with regard to the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officers (“NEOs”) for 2025, as well as certain changes we have made to our executive compensation program since the end of 2025.
Our NEOs for 2025 are:
|
||||
Steven M. Kobos
|
Dana A. Armstrong |
David A. Liner |
Oliver L. Simpson |
Alisa Newman Hood |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer |
Executive Vice President and General Counsel |
Summary of 2025 Performance Achievements
We delivered strong results in 2025, seeing continued financial success and significant operational achievements, including the following:
* Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP metric. For a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA, see Item 7 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Compensation Philosophy, Objectives & Elements
Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, retain, incentivize and reward talented leaders with the skills and experience necessary to successfully execute on our business plans and objectives. We further seek to align our executive’s incentives with those of our stockholders and to provide pay levels commensurate with both individual and Company performance. This alignment motivates executives to achieve pre-determined goals and create long-term stockholder value. We also believe our compensation programs and policies should mitigate excessive risk-taking, prevent misconduct and protect stockholder value. Therefore, our executive compensation program includes key features that align those interests, such as:
17
Compensation Objectives: What our Compensation Programs Aim to Achieve
Our compensation programs intend to attract, retain, motivate, and develop key executive talent, in alignment with the following objectives:
Key Design Principles and Compensation Elements: What we pay, and why we pay it
Consistent with these objectives, the 2025 compensation program for the NEOs was comprised of a balanced mix of fixed and variable compensation, with a substantial portion delivered through at-risk incentives and a greater emphasis on long-term, equity-based compensation, as follows:
Pay Element |
Key Features |
|
Purpose of Pay Element |
||
Base Salary |
• |
Reflects an executive officer’s role, experience, scope of responsibility, and sustained performance |
|
• |
Provides a fixed level of annual cash compensation. |
Short-Term Incentives “STIP” |
Annual cash performance-based incentive that may be earned based on the attainment of the following objectives: |
|
Motivates and rewards achievement of short‑term goals and objectives that are important to the execution of our annual business plan. |
||
|
Target incentive opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary, with actual payouts varying from 0% to 200% of target based on performance results. Achieving target performance generally requires exceeding prior year results. |
|
|
||
Long-Term Equity |
Comprised of: |
|
Aligns executive compensation with long-term Company performance and shareholder value creation, while also supporting key talent retention. |
||
18
Setting Executive Compensation
Before each year begins, we review executive compensation levels and programs to assess their competitiveness and alignment with business priorities. This assessment is conducted by our Compensation Committee, with assistance from its independent compensation consultant (as further discussed below), and our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). In reviewing our executive compensation programs, the Compensation Committee considers publicly-available compensation benchmarking information and market survey data, which are used to assess executive target pay levels against both the executives of our compensation reference group as well as general industry and energy industry perspectives. The Compensation Committee also considers the following when making decisions on executive officer compensation: individual skills, experience, expertise and performance, known differences in the scope of roles between Excelerate and our compensation reference group and/or industry survey companies, Excelerate’s relative size, financial condition and prospects for future performance, relative business complexity, perspectives on the practical labor market for a given position and internal positioning.
Roles in the Compensation Determination Process
The Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners (“Meridian”) to advise on preliminary executive compensation benchmarking and the design of the 2025 STIP and LTIP. Following a competitive request‑for‑proposal process that concluded in August 2025, the Compensation Committee retained FW Cook as its new independent compensation consultant, after which FW Cook advised on compensation reference group updates as well as director and executive compensation benchmarking for establishing 2026 target compensation levels. Meridian and FW Cook, as applicable, are referred to herein as the “Independent Compensation Consultant”.
Participant |
Role |
Compensation Committee |
The Compensation Committee assists the Board in overseeing executive and director compensation. Its responsibilities include but are not limited to: • Overseeing the Company’s overall compensation philosophy, and assessing whether it is aligned with the Company’s business strategy and stockholder interests; • Reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of executive officers, evaluating performance in light of those goals and objectives, and setting compensation level based on this evaluation; and • Overseeing the assessment of the risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and programs.
|
Chief Executive Officer |
The CEO presents to the Compensation Committee his performance assessments and compensation recommendations for each executive officer, other than himself. Decisions regarding the CEO’s compensation take place during an executive session, where all members of management are excused.
|
Independent Compensation Consultant
|
The Independent Compensation Consultant attends every Compensation Committee meeting, and advises the Compensation Committee on matters related to executive officer compensation, plan design, and regulatory and industry updates as well as provides objective insights on the CEO’s compensation recommendations.
The Independent Compensation Consultant provides their assessment to the Compensation Committee via an annual review of our compensation programs, to determine if our compensation programs encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking, and to advise on any risk inherent in our compensation programs that could have a material adverse effect on us.
Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews the Independent Compensation Consultant and completes an assessment of any potential conflicts of interest raised by the consultant’s work. In 2025, the Compensation Committee conducted a formal review of Meridian and concluded that Meridian is independent and there are no conflicts of interest. In early 2026, the Compensation Committee conducted a formal review of FW Cook and concluded that FW Cook is independent and there are no conflicts of interest. Neither Meridian nor FW Cook provided services to the Company outside of advising on executive and director compensation during 2025.
|
Compensation Committee Decision Timeline
Q2 Meeting |
Q3 Meeting |
Q4 Meeting |
Q1 Meeting |
Review proxy season outcomes and say-on-pay results, institutional investor reports, and other factors that may inform executive compensation program design considerations
|
Confirm benchmarking approach and compensation reference group for assessing executive compensation levels and programs |
Review benchmarking results and analysis of our target compensation levels and program designs |
Approve target compensation levels, STIP and LTIP designs for the year, and equity awards to be granted |
19
Every Meeting: • Review compensation trends, legislative and governance updates • Track progress of STIP and LTIP performance metrics • Meet in Executive Sessions as appropriate
|
Compensation Reference Group and Survey Data
With the Independent Compensation Consultant’s assistance, the Compensation Committee established a compensation reference group to benchmark target pay levels and incentive plan design for executive officers. In addition to data prepared by the Independent Compensation Consultant regarding this compensation reference group, the Committee also considered general industry and energy industry survey data when setting compensation levels. When assessing companies for potential inclusion in our compensation reference group, the Compensation Committee focused on companies similar in size, industry sector, operational scope and business model who provided sufficient and comparable compensation disclosures. In evaluating companies for potential inclusion in our compensation reference group based on market capitalization, we calculate our market capitalization based on the combined number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding as of the measurement date.
The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation reference group annually and determines if adjustments are necessary or appropriate. For fiscal 2025, the Compensation Committee approved the same compensation reference group as was used in fiscal 2024, except Crestwood Energy Partners, LP and Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P., which were removed from the group due to recent merger and acquisition activity.
The following companies comprised the compensation reference group for fiscal 2025:
Chart Industries, Inc. |
Genesis Energy, L.P. |
NuStar Energy L.P. |
Dorian LPG Ltd. |
Green Plains Inc. |
Oceaneering International, Inc. |
DT Midstream, Inc. |
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. |
Oil States International, Inc. |
EnLink Midstream, LLC |
International Seaways, Inc. |
Tidewater Inc. |
Equitrans Midstream Corporation |
Kirby Corporation |
Western Midstream Partners, LP |
Genco Shipping and Trading Ltd. |
New Fortress Energy Inc. |
|
In October 2025, with assistance from the Independent Compensation Consultant, the Compensation Committee established an updated compensation reference group for purposes of evaluating 2026 target pay levels and incentive plan design for executive officers. This group includes companies of similar size and scope of Excelerate Energy, as well as companies with comparable financial and business characteristics, including select companies outside of the Company’s core industry. When compared with the compensation reference group used for fiscal 2025, this new fiscal 2026 compensation reference group both (a) aligns Excelerate more closely to the median of such group with respect to key size and scope metrics and (b) provides for a larger data set allowing for a more robust and potentially less volatile source for comparative analysis. In establishing this compensation reference group, five of Excelerate’s prior compensation reference group members were removed, nine companies remained as compensation reference group members, and 17 new companies across broader energy, industrials and utilities sectors were added.
Archrock, Inc. |
Genco Shipping and Trading Ltd. |
Oceaneering International, Inc. |
Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. |
Genesis Energy, L.P. |
Seadrill Ltd. |
Black Hills Corp |
Helios Technologies, Inc. |
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. |
Chesapeake Utilities Corp |
International Seaways, Inc. |
Spire, Inc. |
Dorian LPG Ltd. |
Kinetik Holdings Inc. |
Standex International Corp |
DT Midstream, Inc. |
Kirby Corporation |
Tidewater Inc. |
Enerpac Tool Group Corp |
McGrath RentCorp |
TransAlta Corporation |
Enpro Inc. |
MGE Energy, Inc. |
Valaris Ltd. |
ESCO Technologies Inc. |
New Fortress Energy Inc. |
|
Although the Compensation Committee considers reference group benchmarking data as well as industry survey data when setting target pay levels and generally targets pay within a competitive range for each position, it retains discretion to pay above or below such level after considering the executive’s role, experience, responsibilities, performance and retention needs.
For our LTIP, the Compensation Committee also established a separate performance peer group against which our relative TSR performance is measured. For 2025, consistent with 2024, the performance peer group consisted of the companies included in the Vanguard Energy ETF Market Index as of January 1, 2025.
2025 Compensation Decisions
Base Salary
Each NEO’s base salary is a fixed component of compensation for performing specific job duties and functions and is established at a level commensurate with the NEO’s expertise, experience, and tenure. In February 2025, the Compensation Committee reviewed base salary levels for all executive officers as part of its annual compensation review process and approved increases to Ms. Armstrong’s, Mr. Liner’s and Ms. Newman Hood’s
20
base salaries retroactive to the first pay period of 2025, to more closely align their compensation with compensation reference group and industry survey data for their respective roles.
Set forth below are our NEO’s annual base salary levels as in effect as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2025.
NEO |
Annual Base Salary in Effect as of 12/31/2024 |
Annual Base Salary in Effect as of 12/31/2025 |
Year-Over-Year Change |
Steven M. Kobos |
$850,000 |
$850,000 |
No Change |
Dana A. Armstrong |
$460,000 |
$475,000 |
3% |
David A. Liner |
$460,000 |
$480,000 |
4% |
Oliver L. Simpson |
$460,000 |
$460,000 |
No Change |
Alisa Newman Hood |
$455,000 |
$470,000 |
3% |
Short-Term Incentive Plan
Our short-term incentive plan (“STIP”) provides a meaningful portion of cash compensation in a form that flexes with Company performance, motivating our NEOs to deliver on key business objectives. Awards under the STIP may be earned based upon the achievement of annual Company and individual performance goals. Each NEO has a target STIP opportunity set as a percentage of his or her STIP-eligible annual base salary. The Compensation Committee increased the 2025 STIP targets for Ms. Armstrong, Mr. Liner and Ms. Newman Hood as reflected in the following table, in recognition of their individual performance and to more closely align their compensation with compensation reference group and industry survey data for their respective roles.
For 2025, our NEOs’ STIP targets were as follows:
NEO |
2024 Target STIP Award |
2025 Target STIP Award |
Steven M. Kobos |
100% |
100% |
Dana A. Armstrong |
70% |
75% |
David A. Liner |
65% |
70% |
Oliver L. Simpson |
65% |
65% |
Alisa Newman Hood |
65% |
70% |
The 2025 STIP was earned based on the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the performance of each NEO and our achievement of the following enterprise performance measures:
Threshold, target, stretch, and maximum performance goals are established for the Incentive Adjusted EBITDA measure. STIP payouts for performance relative to these goals are as follows:
Payouts for achievement between goal levels are calculated using linear interpolation. These performance levels do not apply for Business Development, Safety Performance, and Strategic Goals.
Below is a summary of the performance measures applicable to the 2025 STIP, as well as the achievement of those goals, in each case before application of the Strategic Goals achievement for each individual:
21
Performance Goal |
Description of Performance Goal |
|
Achievement |
Weighted |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Incentive Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
Incentive Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure with threshold, target, stretch, and maximum performance goals. If performance falls below the threshold, there is no payout, otherwise payouts for achievement between goal levels are calculated using linear interpolation. The 2025 Incentive Adjusted EBITDA goals, and their relevant payout percentage of target, are set forth below: |
|
108% |
59.4% |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Goals |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Stretch |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
||||
|
(millions) |
|
(millions) |
|
(millions) |
|
(millions) |
|
|
|
||||
|
$ |
367.6 |
|
$ |
420.1 |
|
$ |
472.6 |
|
$ |
504.1 |
|
|
|
|
Payout upon Achievement of Goal: |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Stretch |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
||||
|
(payout) |
|
(payout) |
|
(payout) |
|
(payout) |
|
|
|
||||
|
50% of target |
|
100% of target |
|
150% of target |
|
200% of target |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
For 2025, the actual achievement was equal to $453.4 million. |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Business Development |
Qualitative metric based on advancement of objective, critical business development milestones including value-accretive placement of Acadia (our new build vessel), binding contracts in place to sell-off majority of VG volumes and execution of new business upgrades/extensions and successful integration of newly-acquired Jamaica business. |
|
180% |
45.0% |
||||||||||
Safety Performance(2) |
Comprehensive metric based on achievement of safety and environmental metrics as noted below, as well as qualitative inputs including overall enterprise safety culture enhancements. |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Lost Time Injury Frequency |
|
106% |
6.4% |
||||||||||
|
Total Recordable Case Frequency |
|
126% |
1.6% |
||||||||||
|
Zero Hydrocarbon Spills to Sea |
|
100% |
2.7% |
||||||||||
Final Achievement Prior to Strategic Goals |
115.1% |
|||||||||||||
The Compensation Committee also evaluated the NEO’s achievement of the Strategic Goals, which had been established by the Compensation Committee at the start of the year (weighted 20%, with a 0% to 200% payout opportunity). Individual NEO achievement for this portion ranged from 150% to 160%.
Areas of achievement for 2025 considered in arriving at these results included:
22
In February 2026, the Compensation Committee assessed the performance of our NEOs and the Company as a whole and determined 2025 STIP payouts as follows:
NEO |
Annual Base Salary in Effect as of 12/31/2025 |
2025 Target STIP % of Base Salary |
2025 Target STIP Award |
2025 |
Steven M. Kobos |
$850,000 |
100% |
$850,000 |
$1,250,350 |
Dana A. Armstrong |
$475,000 |
75% |
$356,250 |
$516,920 |
David A. Liner |
$480,000 |
70% |
$336,000 |
$494,260 |
Oliver L. Simpson |
$460,000 |
65% |
$299,000 |
$439,830 |
Alisa Newman Hood |
$470,000 |
70% |
$329,000 |
$477,380 |
The resulting overall STIP award payouts as a percentage of target for the NEOs ranged from 145.1% to 147.1%.
Long-Term Equity Incentives
The Company maintains the Excelerate Energy, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) to promote and closely align the interests of the Company’s employees, officers, non-employee directors and other service providers and its stockholders by providing stock-based compensation and other performance-based compensation. The LTIP allows for the grant of stock options (both incentive stock options and “non-qualified” stock options), stock appreciation rights (alone or in conjunction with other awards), restricted stock and RSUs (including grants of RSUs that are subject to the attainment of performance conditions), incentive bonuses (which may be paid in cash, stock or a combination thereof), and other stock-based awards.
Effective March 5, 2025, the board approved long-term incentive awards for the NEOs, delivered in the form of 50% RSUs and 50% PSUs. The RSU awards vest ratably in annual installments over three years from the date of grant generally subject to continued employment. Similar to 2024, the 2025 PSUs were divided among two separately-measured metrics: relative total shareholder and absolute total shareholder return. The PSUs vest based on the Company’s performance over a three-year performance period (January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027). Earned awards are settled in shares. NEOs must also generally remain employed through the certification (anticipated February 2028) in order to receive any earned and vested PSUs.
The number of RSUs and the target number of PSUs granted to each NEO was determined by dividing the target dollar value of each award by the closing market price per share of our Class A Common Stock on the last trading day prior to the date of grant, March 4, 2025, which was $30.15.
NEO |
Quantity of RSUs Granted |
|
Target Quantity of PSUs Granted |
|
Total Value of RSUs and PSUs Approved |
|
|||
Steven M. Kobos |
|
53,483 |
|
|
53,482 |
|
|
3,225,000 |
|
Dana A. Armstrong |
|
18,773 |
|
|
18,772 |
|
|
1,132,000 |
|
David A. Liner |
|
15,489 |
|
|
15,490 |
|
|
934,000 |
|
Oliver L. Simpson |
|
12,438 |
|
|
12,438 |
|
|
750,000 |
|
Alisa Newman Hood |
|
9,967 |
|
|
9,966 |
|
|
601,000 |
|
ATSR PSUs
The 50% component of the PSUs allocated to ATSR performance are earned based on Excelerate’s three-year cumulative total shareholder return as compared to the following pre-established goals, set at the start of the January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027 performance period.
At the end of the performance period, a percentile ranking is calculated and applied to the payout scale to determine the number of earned PSUs, which may range from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs awarded. The Compensation Committee will determine the Company’s percentile ranking and the associated number of ATSR PSUs earned by multiplying the target shares allocated as ATSR PSUs by the applicable payout percentage, determined in accordance with the following payout scale (with straight-line interpolation for any attained percentile within two designated percentile levels):
Performance Level |
Annualized |
Payout % |
Less than Threshold |
Less than 5% |
0% |
Threshold |
5% |
50% |
Target |
10% |
100% |
Maximum |
15% or higher |
200% |
RTSR PSUs
The 50% component of the PSUs allocated to RTSR performance are earned based on Excelerate’s cumulative total shareholder return relative to the constituent companies of the Vanguard Energy ETF market index as of January 1, 2025, over the January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027 performance period.
23
At the end of the performance period, a percentile ranking is calculated and applied to the payout scale to determine the number of earned PSUs, which may range from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs awarded. If absolute total shareholder return over the performance period is negative, payouts in respect of this award will be capped at 100% of the target number of PSUs granted, regardless of the Company’s RTSR positioning. The Compensation Committee will determine the Company’s percentile ranking and the associated number of RTSR PSUs earned by multiplying the target shares allocated as RTSR PSUs by the applicable payout percentage, determined in accordance with the following payout scale (with straight-line interpolation for any attained percentile within two designated percentile levels):
Percentile Rank Relative TSR |
Payout % of Target # of RTSR PSUs |
<25th |
0% |
25th |
50% |
50th |
100% |
60th |
125% |
70th |
150% |
80th |
175% |
90th or better |
200% |
Looking ahead to 2026, the Compensation Committee approved continued use of the RTSR metric, weight and payout scale, including the target payout cap if ATSR is negative. However, the ATSR metric (representing 1/2 of the annual PSU award) was replaced with a 3-year Adjusted EBITDA compound annual growth rate metric. The Compensation Committee made this change to emphasize Company focus on long-term EBITDA growth while maintaining strong stockholder alignment. In addition, the Committee maintained time-based RSU’s at 50% of the total target LTIP value weight.
2023 PSU Payouts
Each of the NEOs was granted PSUs in March 2023 that vested in February 2026, based on the Company’s achievement of average annual Incentive Adjusted EBITDA and RTSR performance metrics over a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2025. The Company’s RTSR over the performance period was at the 48.4th percentile among the companies in the Vanguard Energy ETF Market Index as of January 1, 2023, resulting in a 96.8% payout for this portion of the award. The Incentive Adjusted EBITDA targets established for 2023, 2024 and 2025 were $288 million, $323 million, and $420.1 million, respectively, with actual achievement at $324.5 million, $338 million, and $453.4 million, respectively, resulting in a 132% payout for this portion of the award, and a total payout at 114.4% of the target PSUs granted. Mr. Kobos and Mr. Liner deferred settlement of their PSUs under the NQDC Plan.
NEO |
2023 PSUs Earned |
|
|
Steven M. Kobos |
|
66,144 |
|
Dana A. Armstrong |
|
17,198 |
|
David A. Liner |
|
10,582 |
|
Oliver L. Simpson |
|
1,672 |
|
Alisa Newman Hood |
|
8,599 |
|
Other Compensation Items
401(k) Plan
Excelerate sponsors a tax-qualified 401(k) plan in which the NEOs and all other eligible U.S. employees may participate. The 401(k) plan provides for Company matching contributions equal to 100% of a participant’s contributions up to 3% of their eligible compensation and 50% of a participant’s contributions up to 5% of eligible compensation. Matching contributions provided to our NEOs are reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table below.
Deferred Compensation Plan
Excelerate maintains the Excelerate Energy Deferred Compensation Plan (the “NQDC Plan”), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan under which our independent directors and certain highly compensated employees, including each of the NEOs, are permitted to elect to defer the receipt of certain compensation until a separation from service or other designated future payment date. Excelerate may make discretionary contributions to any participant’s account under the NQDC Plan from time to time. Amounts deferred under the plan or contributed to the plan accrue deemed earnings based on the returns of a menu of designated investment funds. For additional information on this plan, including 2025 contributions thereto, see “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan” below.
Of our NEOs, only Mr. Kobos, Mr. Liner and Mr. Simpson participated in the NQDC Plan in 2025. The Company provided employer contributions to certain NEOs in respect of foregone company match opportunity under the 401(k) plan for 2024 (which contributions are reflected in “All Other Compensation” as part of the Summary Compensation Table).
24
Limited Perquisites
The Company provides limited perquisites to executive officers. The Company does not provide a tax-gross up to offset imputed income realized by any of our NEOs as a result of such perquisites. When the aggregate value of such perquisites and personal benefits is $10,000 or more for the year, it is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Compensation Arrangements
Employment Agreements
We are not party to any employment agreements with our NEOs although certain officers have entered into offer letters that established their initial compensation levels.
Other Compensation Matters
Hedging and Pledging Policies
Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our directors, officers and employees and members of their immediate families and households and their controlled entities (i.e., corporations or other business entities controlled or managed by any such person and trusts or other entities for which any such person is the trustee or in which any such person has a beneficial pecuniary interest) from (i) engaging in speculative transactions (including short sales and puts or calls), (ii) hedging Company securities (including through the purchase of financial instruments such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) and (iii) pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan or holding Company securities in a margin account.
Equity Grant Policies and Practices
Clawback And Forfeiture Policies
We are committed to conducting business with integrity in accordance with high ethical standards and in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, including those applicable to the accuracy of the Company’s publicly reported financial information. The Compensation Committee maintains our Clawback and Forfeiture Policy. The policy applies to all equity (whether time- or performance-based) and incentive compensation paid, granted, earned, vested or otherwise awarded to current or former executive officers. The Compensation Committee may claw back such covered compensation if (i) the Company is required to restate its financial statements due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirements or the Company calculated performance achievement in a materially inaccurate manner and the Compensation Committee determines that incentive compensation would have been lower under the restated financial results or correct calculation of the performance metric or (ii) the executive officer has engaged in egregious conduct that is substantially detrimental to the Company.
The Compensation Committee has also adopted an additional mandatory Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy (the “Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy”) designed to comply with final listing standards adopted by the New York Stock Exchange to implement Exchange Act Rule 10D-1. Under the Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy, the Company will recoup any excess incentive-based compensation earned by an executive officer (including each of our NEOs), on or after October 2, 2023 and during a three fiscal year lookback period, in the event of a financial restatement if a lesser amount of incentive-based compensation would have been earned had such incentive-based compensation been determined based on the restated results.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We believe in aligning the interests of the Company’s leaders with those of the Company’s stockholders. To promote this alignment and the Company’s commitment to sound corporate governance, the Company maintains a Stock Ownership and Retention Policy. The policy applies to each independent member of the board and to each of our executive officers, who are subject to the following ownership guidelines:
Position |
Ownership Level |
Independent Directors |
5x annual cash retainer |
Chief Executive Officer |
5x annual base salary |
Chief Financial Officer |
3x annual base salary |
Other Executive Officers |
2x annual base salary |
Shares of common stock owned directly, owned by a spouse, minor child, any other immediate family member residing in the same household or held in a trust for the benefit of any such individual and shares underlying all outstanding Company equity awards (whether vested or unvested) other than unexercised stock options and any unearned performance-based stock awards are counted as owned under the policy. Participants have five years from the later of (i) November 7, 2022 and (ii) the date of appointment to their position to comply with the minimum ownership requirement.
Until the Minimum Ownership Requirement is met and if a Participant’s Company Equity holdings drop below the applicable Minimum Ownership Requirement as of annual measurement dates, Participants are (i) prohibited from selling or otherwise disposing of any company equity, and (ii) required to hold 75% of the Net Shares (as defined below) acquired through the Company’s equity compensation programs, in each case until the
25
applicable Minimum Ownership Requirement is met. “Net Shares” are those shares of Company common stock that remain after shares are sold or withheld to pay the exercise price of stock options (if applicable) and any applicable payroll and withholding taxes.
Each of our NEOs have achieved their Minimum Ownership Requirement or are on track to achieve their Minimum Ownership Requirement within the requisite time period.
Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee has reviewed our compensation programs in consultation with its independent consultant and has determined that our executive and non-executive compensation programs do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking, and any risk inherent in our compensation programs is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on us.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included herein with management, and based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Compensation Committee
Paul T. Hanrahan (Chairperson)
Tyler D. Todd
Robert A. Waldo
26
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
Summary Compensation Table
The table below sets forth the annual compensation paid to, earned by, or granted to the NEOs during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023. Mr. Simpson was not a NEO for fiscal year 2023.
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary |
Bonus |
Stock Awards (1) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (2) |
All Other |
Total |
Steven M. Kobos |
2025 |
$850,000 |
$0 |
$3,988,484 |
$1,250,350 |
$15,980 |
$6,104,814 |
President and Chief Executive |
2024 |
$850,000 |
$0 |
$3,514,051 |
$1,058,888 |
$15,069 |
$5,438,007 |
Officer |
2023 |
$859,615 |
$68,250 |
$2,335,210 |
$804,200 |
$14,469 |
$4,081,744 |
Dana A. Armstrong |
2025 |
$475,001 |
$0 |
$1,372,379 |
$516,920 |
$14,690 |
$2,378,990 |
EVP & Chief Financial Officer |
2024 |
$460,000 |
$0 |
$866,688 |
$417,200 |
$14,473 |
$1,758,361 |
|
2023 |
$425,000 |
$53,850 |
$607,133 |
$342,100 |
$13,873 |
$1,441,956 |
David A. Liner |
2025 |
$480,000 |
$0 |
$1,115,835 |
$494,260 |
$24,270 |
$2,114,365 |
EVP & Chief Operating Officer |
2024 |
$460,000 |
$0 |
$664,724 |
$387,400 |
$4,909 |
$1,517,033 |
|
2023 |
$400,000 |
$54,000 |
$373,638 |
$296,300 |
$4,638 |
$1,128,576 |
Oliver L. Simpson |
2025 |
$460,000 |
$0 |
$864,719 |
$439,830 |
$24,372 |
$1,788,922 |
EVP & Chief Commercial Officer |
2024 |
$376,327 |
$0 |
$925,108 |
$289,400 |
$4,028 |
$1,594,863 |
Alisa Newman Hood |
2025 |
$470,000 |
$0 |
$726,169 |
$477,380 |
$14,690 |
$1,688,240 |
EVP & General Counsel |
2024 |
$455,000 |
$0 |
$473,375 |
$377,300 |
$14,473 |
$1,320,148 |
|
2023 |
$455,000 |
$68,250 |
$303,553 |
$365,700 |
$6,869 |
$1,199,372 |
Name |
Company Contributions to 401(k) Plan |
Company Contributions to NQDC Plan |
Life & |
Total All Other Compensation |
Steven M. Kobos |
$14,000 |
$0 |
$1,980 |
$15,980 |
Dana A. Armstrong |
$14,000 |
$0 |
$690 |
$14,690 |
David A. Liner |
$14,000 |
$9,580 |
$690 |
$24,270 |
Oliver L. Simpson |
$14,000 |
$10,072 |
$300 |
$24,372 |
Alisa Newman Hood |
$14,000 |
$0 |
$690 |
$14,690 |
27
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information with respect to (1) the short term incentive opportunities provided to each NEO for 2025 under the STIP and (2) the stock awards granted to each NEO under our LTIP.
Name |
Award Type |
Grant |
Approval |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares or Stock Units |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (5) |
||||
|
|
|
|
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
(#) |
($) |
Steven M. |
STIP |
|
|
$191,250 |
$850,000 |
$1,625,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kobos |
RSU |
3/5/2025 |
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,483 |
1,612,512 |
|
PSU (2) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
13,371 |
26,741 |
53,482 |
|
911,333 |
|
PSU (3) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
13,371 |
26,741 |
53,482 |
|
1,161,362 |
|
PSU (4) |
3/27/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
4,819 |
9,637 |
19,274 |
|
303,276 |
Dana A. |
STIP |
|
|
$80,156 |
$356,250 |
$681,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Armstrong |
RSU |
3/5/2025 |
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,773 |
566,006 |
|
PSU (2) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
4,693 |
9,386 |
18,772 |
|
319,875 |
|
PSU (3) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
4,693 |
9,386 |
18,772 |
|
407,634 |
|
PSU (4) |
3/27/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
2,506 |
5,012 |
|
78,864 |
David A. |
STIP |
|
|
$75,600 |
$336,000 |
$642,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liner |
RSU |
3/5/2025 |
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,489 |
466,993 |
|
PSU (2) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
3,873 |
7,745 |
15,490 |
|
263,950 |
|
PSU (3) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
3,873 |
7,745 |
15,490 |
|
336,365 |
|
PSU (4) |
3/27/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
771 |
1,542 |
3,084 |
|
48,527 |
Oliver L. |
STIP |
|
|
$67,275 |
$299,000 |
$571,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
Simpson |
RSU |
3/5/2025 |
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,438 |
375,006 |
|
PSU (2) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
3,110 |
6,219 |
12,438 |
|
211,944 |
|
PSU (3) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
3,110 |
6,219 |
12,438 |
|
270,091 |
|
PSU (4) |
3/27/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
122 |
244 |
488 |
|
7,679 |
Alisa |
STIP |
|
|
$74,025 |
$329,000 |
$629,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
Newman |
RSU |
3/5/2025 |
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,967 |
300,505 |
Hood |
PSU (2) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
4,983 |
9,966 |
|
169,821 |
|
PSU (3) |
3/5/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
4,983 |
9,966 |
|
216,412 |
|
PSU (4) |
3/27/2025 |
2/19/2025 |
|
|
|
627 |
1,253 |
2,506 |
|
39,432 |
28
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows outstanding stock options, RSUs, and PSUs held by each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2025.
|
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options |
|
Option Exercise Price |
|
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested |
|
|
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (2) |
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (2) |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable (1) |
|
($) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
(#) |
($) |
|
|||||||||
Steven M. |
4/13/2022 |
|
53,333 |
|
|
35,556 |
|
|
24.00 |
|
4/13/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Kobos |
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,272 |
|
(3) |
|
540,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,983 |
|
(4) |
|
784,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,161 |
|
(5) |
|
1,070,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,047 |
|
(3) |
|
1,964,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,070 |
|
(6) |
|
2,947,214 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,070 |
|
(7) |
|
2,947,214 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,483 |
|
(3) |
|
1,500,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,371 |
|
(10) |
|
375,043 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,741 |
|
(11) |
|
750,085 |
|
|||||
Dana A. |
4/13/2022 |
|
12,000 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
24.00 |
|
4/13/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Armstrong |
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,011 |
|
(3) |
|
140,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,276 |
|
(4) |
|
204,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,922 |
|
(5) |
|
278,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,234 |
|
(3) |
|
483,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,852 |
|
(6) |
|
725,149 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,850 |
|
(7) |
|
725,093 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,773 |
|
(3) |
|
526,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,693 |
|
(10) |
|
131,639 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,386 |
|
(11) |
|
263,277 |
|
|||||
David A. |
4/13/2022 |
|
4,800 |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
24.00 |
|
4/13/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liner |
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
(3) |
|
86,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,477 |
|
(4) |
|
125,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,105 |
|
(5) |
|
171,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,342 |
|
(3) |
|
374,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,014 |
|
(6) |
|
561,393 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,012 |
|
(7) |
|
561,337 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,489 |
|
(3) |
|
434,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,873 |
|
(10) |
|
108,624 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,745 |
|
(11) |
|
217,247 |
|
|||||
Oliver L. |
4/13/2022 |
|
3,466 |
|
|
2,312 |
|
|
24.00 |
|
4/13/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Simpson |
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
(3) |
|
40,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
(4) |
|
19,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965 |
|
(5) |
|
27,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,327 |
|
(3) |
|
457,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,342 |
|
(6) |
|
374,243 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,342 |
|
(7) |
|
374,243 |
|
|||||
|
11/1/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
(3) |
|
101,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
11/1/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,444 |
|
(8) |
|
152,704 |
|
|||||
|
11/1/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,444 |
|
(9) |
|
152,704 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,438 |
|
(3) |
|
348,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,110 |
|
(10) |
|
87,221 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,219 |
|
(11) |
|
174,443 |
|
|||||
Alisa |
4/13/2022 |
|
5,333 |
|
|
3,556 |
|
|
24.00 |
|
4/13/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Newman |
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
(3) |
|
70,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Hood |
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
(4) |
|
102,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/31/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,961 |
|
(5) |
|
139,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,451 |
|
(3) |
|
265,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,176 |
|
(6) |
|
397,637 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,176 |
|
(7) |
|
397,637 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,967 |
|
(3) |
|
279,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,492 |
|
(10) |
|
69,887 |
|
|||||
|
3/5/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
(11) |
|
139,773 |
|
|||||
29
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
None of our NEOs exercised any stock options during 2025.
The following table reflects the value of RSUs that vested during the year:
|
Stock Awards |
|
||||
Name |
Number of Shares Acquired On Vesting |
|
Value Realized on Vesting (1) |
|
||
Steven M. Kobos |
|
54,296 |
|
$ |
1,595,395 |
|
Dana A. Armstrong |
|
13,627 |
|
$ |
400,032 |
|
David A. Liner |
|
9,754 |
|
$ |
287,424 |
|
Oliver L. Simpson |
|
11,436 |
|
$ |
333,953 |
|
Alisa Newman Hood |
|
7,231 |
|
$ |
212,602 |
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Excelerate sponsors and maintains the Excelerate Energy Deferred Compensation Plan, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan under which our directors and certain highly compensated employees, including each of the NEOs, are permitted to elect to defer the receipt of certain compensation until a separation from service or other designated future payment date. Excelerate may also make discretionary contributions to any participant’s account under the NQDC Plan from time to time.
Deferred compensation is credited with deemed earnings based on the returns of certain investment fund options from which plan participants may select. Participants may elect to receive a distribution of their NQDC Plan balance in a single lump sum or in five annual installments upon separation from service. Accelerated distributions may also be provided upon becoming disabled, a severe unforeseeable emergency, or a change in control event. All NQDC Plan contributions are fully vested at all times. Participation elections are made voluntarily on an annual basis.
30
The Excelerate Energy, Inc. LTI Plan also permits eligible participants to elect the deferred receipt of full-value stock awards, which none of our NEOs received in 2025.
The following table shows the contributions, earnings, and account balances for the participating NEOs under the NQDC Plan. For 2025, only Messrs. Kobos, Liner and Simpson participated in the NQDC Plan.
Name |
Executive contributions |
Registrant contributions |
Aggregate earnings |
Aggregate withdrawals/ distributions |
Aggregate balance at last FYE (4) |
Steven M. Kobos |
|
|
|
|
|
NQDC Plan - Cash |
— |
— |
$27,167 |
— |
$218,620 |
NQDC Plan - LTIP Awards |
$1,595,395 |
— |
$(114,790) |
— |
$2,063,582 |
David A. Liner |
|
|
|
|
|
NQDC Plan - Cash |
$120,352 |
$9,580 |
$39,345 |
— |
$473,609 |
NQDC Plan - LTIP Awards |
$287,424 |
— |
$(20,609) |
— |
$360,106 |
Oliver L. Simpson |
|
|
|
|
|
NQDC Plan - Cash |
— |
$10,072 |
$96 |
— |
$10,168 |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control
We maintain the Excelerate Energy, Inc. Executive Severance Plan and the Excelerate Energy, Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan, each of which provide for certain payments and benefits to the Company’s executive officers, including each of the NEOs, in the event of a termination of employment both outside the context of a change in control and within 24 months following a change in control of the Company. The plans provide that upon a termination of employment by the Company other than for cause, death or disability, a participant will be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits, subject to the execution and delivery of a separation agreement containing, among other provisions, an effective release of claims in favor of the Company:
In January 2025, the Compensation Committee amended the Change in Control Severance Plan to increase the severance multiple from 2.0X to 2.5X for the NEOs other than Mr. Kobos.
In addition to our severance plans, under the terms of our outstanding equity awards, certain awards may accelerate and vest in connection with a qualifying termination of employment. With respect to our stock option awards, upon an NEO’s termination of employment without cause or resignation for good reason within 24 months following a change in control, or upon an NEO’s death or termination of employment by reason of disability, all unvested options fully accelerate and remain exercisable for a period of 12 months (or until the earlier expiration of the term of such option). Under our RSU awards, upon an NEO’s termination of employment without cause or a resignation for good reason within 24 months following a change in control, or upon an NEO’s death or termination of employment by reason of disability, all unvested RSUs fully accelerate and vest in full. Upon an NEO’s death or termination of employment by reason of disability, all unvested PSUs accelerate and vest in full at the “target” level of performance, and upon an NEO’s termination of employment without cause or a resignation for good reason within 24 months of a change in control, PSUs will vest in full at the greater of (i) the “target” level of performance and (ii) actual performance as of the date of the change in control. No accelerated vesting is provided under the terms of the awards in the case of a termination without cause or resignation for good reason outside the context of a change in control.
31
The following table summarizes the payments and benefits that each NEO would have been eligible to receive upon his or her termination of employment under the various circumstances described below as of December 31, 2025.
Name |
Death or Disability |
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason Not in Connection with a Change in Control |
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason in Connection with a Change in Control |
Steven M. Kobos |
|
|
|
Cash Severance |
$0 |
$3,400,000 |
$5,083,000 |
Benefits Continuation |
$0 |
$88,788 |
$110,986 |
Outplacement Benefits |
$0 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
Accelerated Vesting of Options (1) |
$144,002 |
$0 |
$144,002 |
Accelerated Vesting of RSU Awards (2) |
$4,005,596 |
$0 |
$4,005,596 |
Accelerated Vesting of PSU Awards (3) |
$6,069,150 |
$0 |
$6,069,150 |
Total |
$10,218,748 |
$3,498,788 |
$15,422,734 |
Dana A. Armstrong |
|
|
|
Cash Severance |
$0 |
$1,246,875 |
$1,662,500 |
Benefits Continuation |
$0 |
$52,504 |
$70,005 |
Outplacement Benefits |
$0 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
Accelerated Vesting of Options (1) |
$32,400 |
$0 |
$32,400 |
Accelerated Vesting of RSU Awards (2) |
$1,150,555 |
$0 |
$1,150,555 |
Accelerated Vesting of PSU Awards (3) |
$1,673,323 |
$0 |
$1,673,323 |
Total |
$2,856,278 |
$1,309,379 |
$4,598,782 |
David A. Liner |
|
|
|
Cash Severance |
$0 |
$1,224,000 |
$1,632,000 |
Benefits Continuation |
$0 |
$66,592 |
$88,789 |
Outplacement Benefits |
$0 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
Accelerated Vesting of Options (1) |
$12,960 |
$0 |
$12,960 |
Accelerated Vesting of RSU Awards (2) |
$895,216 |
$0 |
$895,216 |
Accelerated Vesting of PSU Awards (3) |
$1,255,350 |
$0 |
$1,255,350 |
Total |
$2,163,525 |
$1,300,592 |
$3,894,314 |
Oliver L. Simpson |
|
|
|
Cash Severance |
$0 |
$1,138,500 |
$1,518,000 |
Benefits Continuation |
$0 |
$66,592 |
$88,789 |
Outplacement Benefits |
$0 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
Accelerated Vesting of Options (1) |
$9,364 |
$0 |
$9,364 |
Accelerated Vesting of RSU Awards (2) |
$949,633 |
$0 |
$949,633 |
Accelerated Vesting of PSU Awards (3) |
$916,786 |
$0 |
$916,786 |
Total |
$1,875,783 |
$1,215,092 |
$3,492,572 |
Alisa Newman Hood |
|
|
|
Cash Severance |
$0 |
$1,198,500 |
$1,598,000 |
Benefits Continuation |
$0 |
$4,317 |
$5,757 |
Outplacement Benefits |
$0 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
Accelerated Vesting of Options (1) |
$14,402 |
$0 |
$14,402 |
Accelerated Vesting of RSU Awards (2) |
$614,940 |
$0 |
$614,940 |
Accelerated Vesting of PSU Awards (3) |
$759,792 |
$0 |
$759,792 |
Total |
$1,389,134 |
$1,212,817 |
$3,002,890 |
32
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards and shares remaining available for grant under the Excelerate Energy, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is our only outstanding equity compensation plan, as of December 31, 2025.
Plan Category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) |
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) (2) |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) (3) |
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders |
1,555,124 |
$24.00 |
12,005,527 |
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders (1) |
— |
— |
— |
Total |
1,555,124 |
$24.00 |
12,005,527 |
CEO PAY RATIO
We present below the ratio of annual total compensation of our median compensated employee to the annual total compensation of Mr. Kobos.
The ratio presented below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported below, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
For 2025, we identified our median compensated employee from the 348 workers who were included as employees on our payroll records as of December 31, 2025. We used the sum of each employee’s annual base salary, target annual incentive, and recurring allowances, such as housing and car allowances, with conforming adjustments for permanent employees who were hired during that period but did not work the full calendar year as our consistently applied compensation measure to identify a range of median-compensated employees. We then disregarded employees at the median range who had anomalous compensation characteristics in selecting the median compensated employee.
The 2025 total compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, for Mr. Kobos was $6,104,814. The 2025 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for our median compensated employee was $118,448. The ratio of Mr. Kobos’ total compensation to our median compensated employee’s total annual compensation for fiscal year 2025 is 52 to 1.
33
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (“CAP”) and certain performance measures of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s pay for performance philosophy and how the Company’s aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: |
|
|
|
Year |
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO |
Compensation Actually Paid |
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs (2) |
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs (3) |
Cumulative Total Shareholder Return (4) |
Peer Group Cumulative Total Shareholder Return (5) |
Net Income |
Adjusted |
2025 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
2024 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
2023 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
2022 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO |
2025 |
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total |
$ |
|
|
Less, value of “Stock Awards” reported in Summary Compensation Table |
$ |
( |
) |
Plus, year-end fair value of outstanding and unvested equity awards granted in the year |
$ |
|
|
Plus (less), year over year change in fair value of outstanding and unvested equity awards granted in prior years |
$ |
( |
) |
Plus (less), change in fair value from last day of prior fiscal year to vesting date for equity awards granted in prior years that vested in the year |
$ |
( |
) |
Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Kobos |
$ |
|
|
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs |
2025 |
|
|
Average Summary Compensation Table Total |
$ |
|
|
Less, average value of “Stock Awards” reported in Summary Compensation Table |
$ |
( |
) |
Plus, average year-end fair value of outstanding and unvested equity awards granted in the year |
$ |
|
|
Plus (less), average year over year change in fair value of outstanding and unvested equity awards granted in prior years |
$ |
( |
) |
Plus (less), average change in fair value from last day of prior fiscal year to vesting date for equity awards granted in prior years that vested in the year |
$ |
( |
) |
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs |
$ |
|
|
34
Description of Certain Relationships between Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table
As described in more detail in the section “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. While the Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance, all those Company measures are not presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with SEC rules) for a particular year. In accordance with SEC rules, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table.
Compensation Actually Paid, Cumulative TSR and Peer Group TSR
35
Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
Compensation Actually Paid and Adjusted EBITDA
Financial Performance Measures
As described in greater detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy. The metrics that the Company uses for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our stockholders. The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are as follows:
36
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following is a summary of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s fees for professional services rendered to us for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
Audit Fees (1) |
$3,118,695 |
$2,872,510 |
Audit-related Fees |
$50,000 |
$— |
Tax Fees (2) |
$71,177 |
$167,303 |
All Other Fees (3) |
$2,132 |
$— |
Total |
$3,242,004 |
$3,039,813 |
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services Policy
The Audit Committee adopted a policy for pre-approving all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Audit Committee annually pre-approves a list of specific services and categories of services, subject to a specified cost level. Part of this approval process includes making a determination as to whether permitted non-audit services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee has delegated authority to the chairperson of the Audit Committee to pre-approve audit and non-audit services in amounts up to $500,000 (1) per engagement, (2) per additional category of services, or (3) to the extent otherwise required under the policy, for services exceeding the pre-approved budgeted fee levels for the specified service. All of the services and fees incurred following our initial public offering were approved in accordance with SEC and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requirements and pursuant to the pre-approval policy described in this paragraph.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT*
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence. Based upon such review and discussion, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 for filing with the SEC.
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,
Nisha D. Biswal
Deborah L. Byers (Chairperson)
Paul T. Hanrahan
* This report of the Audit Committee is required by the SEC rules and, in accordance with the SEC’s rules, will not be deemed to be part of or incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Exchange Act, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and will not otherwise be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” under either the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.
37
PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee evaluates the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence at least annually.
Our Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2021. The members of the Audit Committee and our board of directors believe that the continued retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Excelerate’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of Excelerate and its stockholders. Our board of directors and Audit Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and consider the selection of such firm to be an important matter of stockholder concern. The selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is accordingly being submitted for ratification of stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify this selection, our board of directors and Audit Committee will consider the outcome of the vote in determining whether to retain this firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. Even if the selection is ratified, our Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our Company and stockholders.
The ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the voting power of the stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter. Stockholders may vote “For,” “Against,” or “Abstain” with respect to this Proposal 3. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against” on the outcome of Proposal 3. Because we expect broker discretionary voting to be permitted with respect to Proposal 3, we expect there will be no broker non-votes with respect to this Proposal.
One or more representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting online and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and be available to respond to appropriate questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
OUR BOARD, UPON RECOMMENDATION OF OUR AUDIT COMMITTEE, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING December 31, 2026. |
38
Procedures for Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions
Our board of directors has adopted a written policy regarding the review, approval, or disapproval by our Audit Committee of transactions in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries are a participant and any related person (defined in the policy to include any person who is or was (since the beginning of the Company’s last completed fiscal year, even if they do not presently serve in that role) an executive officer, director or nominee for election as a director, greater than 5% beneficial owner of any class of our Common Stock, and any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons) who has or will have a direct or indirect material interest and in which the amount involved since the beginning of our last completed fiscal year exceeds, or is expected to exceed, $100,000. In approving or disapproving any such transaction, our Audit Committee considers the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the Audit Committee. Any director who is a related person, or whose immediate family member is a related person, with respect to a transaction under review will not be permitted to participate in the deliberations or vote on approval or disapproval of the transaction.
Other than the transactions described below under the “Related Person Transactions,” there have been no other “related person transactions” that require disclosure under the SEC rules since the beginning of our last completed fiscal year.
Transactions in Connection with our Reorganization and Initial Public Offering
The Reorganization
In connection with the Reorganization (i.e., the series of transactions immediately before the Company’s initial public offering (the “offering”), which was completed on April 12, 2022), we (i) entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement, the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement, (ii) acquired from EELP all of the Class A interests of EELP, (iii) contributed all of the proceeds of the offering to EELP, (iv) contributed 26,254,167 shares of Class A common stock to EELP, which were used to acquire certain assets, (v) issued 82,021,389 shares of Class B common stock to EE Holdings, and (vi) from time to time after the offering, will allow for the exchange of Class B interests (in combination with the cancellation of the corresponding shares of Class B common stock) for shares of our Class A common stock or, at our election, for cash, on an ongoing basis.
The following are summaries of certain provisions of our related party agreements, which are qualified in their entirety by reference to all of the provisions of such agreements. Because these descriptions are only summaries of the applicable agreements, they do not necessarily contain all of the information that you may find useful. We therefore encourage you to review the agreements in their entirety.
Tax Receivable Agreement
EE Holdings (or certain permitted transferees) may exchange its Class B interests in EELP for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis or, at our election, for cash. As a result of EELP’s purchase of certain assets from the George Kaiser Family Foundation (the “Foundation”), we became entitled to a proportionate share of the existing tax basis of the assets of EELP. In addition, EELP will have in effect an election under Section 754 of the Code for the taxable year of the offering and each taxable year in which an exchange occurs, which is expected to result in increases to the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of EELP attributable to Excelerate. These increases in tax basis are expected to increase Excelerate’s depreciation and amortization deductions for tax purposes and create other tax benefits and may also decrease gains (or increase losses) on future dispositions of certain assets and therefore may reduce the amount of tax that Excelerate would otherwise be required to pay.
Excelerate is party to the Tax Receivable Agreement with EE Holdings. The Tax Receivable Agreement provides for payment by Excelerate to EE Holdings of 85% of the amount of the net cash tax savings, if any, that Excelerate is deemed to realize as a result of our utilization of certain tax benefits resulting from (i) certain increases in the tax basis of assets of EELP and its subsidiaries resulting from exchanges of EELP partnership interests in the future, (ii) certain tax attributes of EELP and subsidiaries of EELP (including the existing tax basis of assets owned by EELP or its subsidiaries and the tax basis of Excelsior, LLC and FSRU Vessel (Excellence), LLC (f/k/a Excellence, LLC) (collectively, the “Foundation Vessels”)) that existed as of the time of the offering or may exist at the time when Class B interests of EELP are exchanged for shares of Class A common stock, and (iii) certain other tax benefits related to Excelerate entering into the Tax Receivable Agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments that Excelerate makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
Excelerate retains the benefit of the remaining 15% of these deemed net cash tax savings. The obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement are Excelerate’s obligations and not obligations of EELP. For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, the net cash savings deemed realized by Excelerate are computed by comparing Excelerate’s U.S. federal, state and local income tax liability, adjusted for certain assumptions, to the amount of such U.S. federal, state and local taxes that Excelerate would have been required to pay had it not been able to utilize any of the benefits subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement. The actual tax benefits realized by Excelerate may differ from the tax benefits used for purposes of calculating payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement as a result of the use of certain assumptions in the Tax Receivable Agreement, including, for example, (i) the assumption that if Excelerate holds interests of EELP through one or more wholly owned subsidiaries, no such subsidiary exists and Excelerate holds all of its EELP interests directly and (ii) the assumption that the increase in tax basis of the assets of EELP that result from exchanges of Class B interests for shares of Class A common stock will be determined by assuming that the assets of EELP have no tax basis other than (to the extent necessary to avoid double counting) that tax basis that is otherwise already being taken into account in calculating payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. In addition, the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement provides that EELP may elect to apply an allocation method with respect to certain of EELP’s investment assets that were held at the time of the closing of the offering that is expected to result in the future, solely for tax purposes, in certain items of loss being specially allocated to Excelerate and corresponding items of gain being specially allocated to the other partners of EELP.
39
The term of the Tax Receivable Agreement will continue until all tax benefits that are subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement have been utilized or have expired, unless Excelerate exercises its right to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement (or the Tax Receivable Agreement is terminated due to a change in control or our breach of a material obligation thereunder), in which case Excelerate will be required to make the termination payment specified in the Tax Receivable Agreement, as detailed below.
Estimating the amount and timing of payments that may be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement is by its nature imprecise, insofar as the calculation of amounts payable depends on a variety of factors and future events. The actual increase in tax basis and utilization of tax attributes, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including (without limitation):
In addition, the depreciation and amortization periods that apply to the increases in tax basis, the timing and amount of any earlier payments that Excelerate may have made under the Tax Receivable Agreement and the portion of Excelerate’s payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that constitute imputed interest or give rise to depreciable or amortizable tax basis are also relevant factors.
Excelerate has the right to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement, in whole or in part, at any time. The Tax Receivable Agreement provides that if (i) Excelerate exercises its right to early termination of the Tax Receivable Agreement in whole (that is, with respect to all benefits due to all beneficiaries under the Tax Receivable Agreement) or in part (that is, with respect to some benefits due to all beneficiaries under the Tax Receivable Agreement), (ii) Excelerate experiences certain changes in control, (iii) the Tax Receivable Agreement is rejected in certain bankruptcy proceedings, (iv) Excelerate fails (subject to certain exceptions) to make a payment under the Tax Receivable Agreement within 180 days after the due date or (v) Excelerate materially breaches its obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, Excelerate will be obligated to make an early termination payment to the beneficiaries under the Tax Receivable Agreement equal to the present value of all payments that would be required to be paid by Excelerate under the Tax Receivable Agreement. The amount of such payments will be determined on the basis of certain assumptions in the Tax Receivable Agreement, including (i) the assumption that Excelerate would have enough taxable income to fully utilize the tax benefit resulting from the tax assets which are the subject of the Tax Receivable Agreement; (ii) the assumption that any item of loss deduction or credit generated by a basis adjustment or imputed interest arising in a taxable year preceding the taxable year that includes an early termination will be used by Excelerate ratably from such taxable year through the earlier of (x) the scheduled expiration of such tax item or (y) 15 years; (iii) the assumption that any non-amortizable assets are deemed to be disposed of in a fully taxable transaction on the fifteenth anniversary of the earlier of the basis adjustment and the early termination date; (iv) the assumption that U.S. federal, state and local tax rates will be the same as in effect on the early termination date, unless scheduled to change; and (v) the assumption that any interests (other than those held by Excelerate) outstanding on the termination date are deemed to be exchanged for an amount equal to the market value of the corresponding number of shares of Class A common stock on the termination date. The amount of the early termination payment is determined by discounting the present value of all payments that would be required to be paid by Excelerate under the Tax Receivable Agreement at a rate equal to the lesser of (a) 6.5% and (b) SOFR plus 400 basis points.
The payments that we are required to make under the Tax Receivable Agreement, including those made if we elect to terminate the agreement early, have the potential to be substantial. Based on certain assumptions, including no material changes in the relevant tax law and that Excelerate earns sufficient taxable income to realize the full tax benefits that are the subject of the Tax Receivable Agreement, we expect that future payments to EE Holdings in respect of the Reorganization and the offering will equal $58.8 million in the aggregate, although the actual future payments to EE Holdings will vary based on the factors discussed above, and estimating the amount of payments that may be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement is by its nature imprecise, insofar as the calculation of amounts payable depends on a variety of factors and future events. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we made a payment under the Tax Receivable Agreement of $1.5 million.
Decisions made in the course of running our business, such as with respect to mergers and other forms of business combinations that constitute changes in control, may influence the timing and amount of payments we make under the Tax Receivable Agreement in a manner that does not correspond to our use of the corresponding tax benefits. In these situations, our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes in control.
Payments are generally due under the Tax Receivable Agreement within a specified period of time following the filing of Excelerate’s tax return for the taxable year with respect to which the payment obligation arises, although interest on such payments will begin to accrue at a rate of SOFR
40
plus 300 basis points from the due date (without extensions) of such tax return. Late payments generally accrue interest at a rate of SOFR plus 500 basis points. Because of our structure, our ability to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement is dependent on the ability of EELP to make distributions to us. The ability of EELP to make such distributions will be subject to, among other things, restrictions in the agreements governing our debt. If we are unable to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid.
Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that we determine. Excelerate will not, in the event of a successful challenge, be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the Tax Receivable Agreement (although Excelerate would reduce future amounts otherwise payable to EE Holdings to the extent EE Holdings has received excess payments). No assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with our tax reporting positions, including the allocation of value among our assets. In addition, the required final and binding determination that a holder of rights under the Tax Receivable Agreement has received excess payments may not be made for a number of years following commencement of any challenge, and Excelerate will not be permitted to reduce its payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement until there has been a final and binding determination, by which time sufficient subsequent payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may not be available to offset prior payments for disallowed benefits. As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement significantly in excess of the benefit that Excelerate is deemed to realize in respect of its utilization of tax benefits resulting from (i) Excelerate’s acquisition of EELP interests from EE Holdings in future exchanges, (ii) the acquisition of certain assets from the Foundation and (iii) any payments Excelerate makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Excelerate may not be able to recoup those payments, which could adversely affect Excelerate’s financial condition and liquidity.
No holder of rights under the Tax Receivable Agreement (including the right to receive payments) may transfer its rights to another person without the written consent of Excelerate, except that all such rights may be transferred to another person to the extent that the corresponding EELP (if any) interests are transferred in accordance with the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement.
EELP Limited Partnership Agreement
In connection with the offering and the Reorganization, the partners of EELP amended and restated the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement. In May 2023, the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement was amended to, among other items, clarify that an exchange of Class B interests for cash at the election of the Company, as EELP’s general partner, will require Excelerate to contribute the net cash proceeds raised by it through an offering of Class A common stock to settle such exchange in full. In December 2025, the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement was amended to implement an intermediate holding company between Excelerate and EELP, with Excelerate owning 100% of the new holding company and the new holding company being the general partner of EELP. In its capacity as the owner of the general partner of EELP, Excelerate controls all of EELP’s business and affairs. Excelerate indirectly (through the intermediate holding company) holds all of the Class A interests of EELP. Holders of Class A interests are generally entitled to one vote per interest with respect to all matters as to which partners are entitled to vote under the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement and through its indirect ownership of the Class A interests of EELP, Excelerate has the power to vote all Class A interests of EELP. No person has any voting rights in EELP on account of the Class B interests, except for the right to approve amendments to the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement that adversely affect the rights of holders of Class B interests. Each Class A interest and Class B interest has the same economic rights per interest.
At any time Excelerate issues a share of Class A common stock for cash, the net proceeds received by Excelerate will be promptly used to acquire (through the intermediate holding company) a Class A interest unless used to settle an exchange of a Class B interest for cash. Any time Excelerate issues a share of Class A common stock upon an exchange of a Class B interest or settles such an exchange for cash, as described below, Excelerate will contribute (through the intermediate holding company) the exchanged interest to EELP and EELP will issue to the intermediate holding company a Class A interest. If Excelerate issues other classes or series of equity securities, EELP will issue to the intermediate holding company an equal amount of equity securities of EELP with designations, preferences and other rights and terms that are substantially the same as Excelerate’s newly issued equity securities. Conversely, if Excelerate retires any shares of Class A common stock (or equity securities of other classes or series) for cash, EELP will, immediately prior to such retirement, redeem an equal number of Class A interests (or its equity securities of the corresponding classes or series) held indirectly by Excelerate (through the intermediate holding company), upon the same terms and for the same price, as the shares of Excelerate’s Class A common stock (or equity securities of such other classes or series) are retired. In addition, partnership interests of EELP, as well as our Common Stock, will be subject to equivalent stock splits, dividends, reclassifications and other subdivisions. As intended by the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement, Excelerate will hold (through its ownership of the intermediate holding company) Class A interests equivalent to the number of outstanding shares of Class A common stock.
Excelerate will have the right to determine when distributions will be made to holders of interests and the amount of any such distributions, other than with respect to tax distributions as described below. If a distribution is authorized, except as described below, such distribution will be made to the holders of Class A interests and Class B interests on a pro rata basis in accordance with the number of interests held by such holder. No adjustments to the redemption or exchange ratio of EELP interests for shares of our Class A common stock will be made as a result of either (i) any cash distribution by us or (ii) any cash that we retain and do not distribute to our stockholders. To the extent that we do not distribute such excess cash as dividends on our Class A common stock and instead, for example, hold such cash balances or lend them to EELP, holders of EELP interests would benefit from any value attributable to such cash balances as a result of their ownership of Class A common stock following a redemption or exchange of their EELP interests.
The holders of interests, including Excelerate, will incur U.S. federal, state and local income taxes on their proportionate share of any taxable income of EELP. In addition, Excelerate may incur additional taxes attributable to its ownership in the general partner of EELP. Net profits and net losses of EELP will generally be allocated to holders of interests on a pro rata basis in accordance with the number of interests held by such holder; however, under applicable tax rules, EELP will be required to allocate net taxable income disproportionately to its partners in certain circumstances. The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement provides for periodic cash distributions, which we refer to as “tax distributions,” to the holders of the interests generally equal to the taxable income allocated to each holder of interests (with certain adjustments) multiplied by an assumed tax rate. Generally, these tax distributions will be computed based on our estimate of the net taxable income of EELP allocable per interest (based on the partner which is allocated the largest amount of taxable income on a per interest basis) multiplied by an assumed tax rate generally equal to the highest combined U.S.
41
federal and applicable state and local tax rate applicable to any Class B interest holder, plus the taxes applicable to Excelerate’s ownership in the general partner of EELP (taking into account certain other assumptions, and subject to adjustment to the extent that state and local taxes are deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes). The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement generally requires tax distributions to be pro rata based on the ownership of EELP interests, however, if the amount of tax distributions to be made exceeds the amount of funds available for distribution, Excelerate (through its ownership of the intermediate holding company) shall receive a tax distribution calculated using the corporate tax rate, before the other members receive any distribution and the balance, if any, of funds available for distribution shall be distributed first to the other partners pro rata in accordance with their assumed tax liabilities (also using the corporate tax rate), and then to all partners (including Excelerate through its ownership of the intermediate holding company) pro rata until each partner receives the full amount of its tax distribution. EELP will also make non-pro rata payments to its general partner to reimburse it for corporate and other overhead expenses (which payments from EELP will not be treated as distributions under the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, no distribution will be made pursuant to the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement to any partner if such distribution would violate applicable law or result in EELP or any of its subsidiaries being in default under any material agreement governing indebtedness.
The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement provides that EELP may elect to apply an allocation method with respect to certain of its investment assets that were held at the time of the closing of the offering that is expected to result in the future, solely for tax purposes, in certain items of loss being specially allocated to us and corresponding items of gain being specially allocated to the other partners of EELP. In conjunction herewith, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that Excelerate will pay over to EE Holdings 85% of the deemed net tax savings to Excelerate attributable to those tax losses.
The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement provides that it may generally be amended, supplemented, waived or modified by its general partner in its sole discretion without the approval of any other holder of interests, except that no amendment can adversely affect the rights of a holder of any class of interests without the consent of holders of a majority of the interests of such class.
The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement entitles partners (and certain permitted transferees thereof) to exchange their Class B interests for shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis or, at our election, for cash.
The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement permits the Class B partners to exercise their exchange rights subject to certain timing and other conditions. The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement provides that an owner does not have the right to exchange Class B interests if the general partner of EELP determines that such exchange would be prohibited by law or regulation or would violate other agreements with our company, EELP or any of our or its subsidiaries, respectively, to which EELP partner is subject.
The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement also provides for mandatory exchanges under certain circumstances, including upon any transfer of partnership interests to a person other than in a qualified transfer (as defined therein), in the case of violation of the transfer provisions of the EELP Limited Partnership Agreement and if the number of interests outstanding (other than those held by the general partner) is less than a minimum percentage.
When a Class B interest is surrendered for exchange, it will not be available for reissuance.
The EELP Limited Partnership Agreement contains certain drag-along and tag-along rights. If Excelerate or its affiliates desires to transfer interests that would constitute a change of control of EELP to a third party that is not our affiliate, we may require each other partner of EELP to either sell the same ratable share of its interests or to exchange its interests in EELP. There are no dissenters’ rights, appraisal rights or similar rights in connection with the exercise of drag-along rights. If we or our affiliates desire to transfer interests in EELP to a third party that is not our affiliate, each other partner will have the option to sell the same ratable share of its interests.
Registration Rights Agreement
In connection with the offering, we entered into the Registration Rights Agreement with EE Holdings and the Foundation, which grants them certain registration rights as described below:
Demand Registration. EE Holdings and the Foundation and their respective permitted transferees may request in writing that we effect a registration (which may be a shelf registration or a registration for an underwritten offering) under the Securities Act of 1933 (as amended, the “Securities Act”) with respect to Class A common stock issuable upon the exchange of EE Holdings’ Class B interests and Class A common stock held by the Foundation, provided that we are under no obligation to effect more than one resale registration within any 90 day period, and we are obligated to effect a resale registration only if the aggregate offering price proposed to be sold pursuant to such registration exceeds $25 million (in the case of a resale shelf registration on Form S-3) or $50 million (in the case of an underwritten offering). Depending on certain conditions, we may defer a demand registration for up to 60 days but not more than 120 days in any twelve-month period. If the holders requesting registration intend to distribute their shares by means of an underwritten offering, the managing underwriter of such offering will have the right to limit the numbers of shares to be underwritten for reasons related to the marketing of the shares. We are obligated to effect shelf takedowns for underwritten offerings upon request, subject to certain limitations.
Piggyback Registration. In the event that we propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act, either for our account or for the account of our other stockholders, EE Holdings and the Foundation and their respective permitted transferees will be entitled to certain piggyback registration rights allowing each to include its shares in the registration, subject to certain marketing and other limitations. As a result, whenever we propose to file a registration statement under the Securities Act, other than with respect to a demand registration, a registration statement on Form S-4 or S-8 or a registration statement solely relating to securities issuable upon the conversion, exchange or exercise of other securities, these holders will be entitled to notice of the registration and will have the right to include their registrable securities in the registration, subject to certain limitations.
42
Expenses; Indemnification. We must pay all registration expenses in connection with effecting any demand registration, shelf registration or piggyback registration. The Registration Rights Agreement contains customary indemnification and contribution provisions.
Term. Any securities covered by the Registration Rights Agreement will no longer be entitled registration rights if such securities have been disposed of pursuant to an effective registration statement or Rule 144, can be immediately sold under Rule 144 without any volume or manner of sale restrictions thereunder or cease to be outstanding.
Stockholder’s Agreement
In connection with the completion of the offering, we entered into a Stockholder’s Agreement with EE Holdings. The Stockholder’s Agreement was amended in August 2023 to remove EE Holdings’ consent right over hiring or terminating Excelerate’s chief executive officer and his or her successors. As described above under “—Composition of our Board of Directors,” subject to the fiduciary duties of the board of directors, the Stockholder’s Agreement grants EE Holdings (including, for purposes of these and consent rights described below, its permitted transferees under the Stockholder’s Agreement) the right to nominate to our board of directors a number of designees equal to at least: (i) a majority of the total number of directors serving on our board, so long as EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) beneficially owns 50% or more of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock; (ii) 40% of the total number of directors, so long as EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) beneficially owns 40% or more, but less than 50%, of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock; (iii) 30% of the total number of directors, so long as EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) beneficially owns 30% or more, but less than 40%, of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock; (iv) 20% of the total number of directors, so long as that EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) beneficially owns 20% or more, but less than 30%, of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock; and (v) 10% of the total number of directors, in the event that EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) beneficially owns 5% or more, but less than 20%, of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock. For purposes of calculating the number of director designees that EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) is entitled to designate as described above, ownership will be adjusted for stock splits, combinations, reclassifications and similar transactions, if any, and any fractional amounts will be automatically rounded up to the nearest whole number (e.g., one and one-quarter of director designees shall equate to two director designees). In addition, in the event a vacancy on the board of directors is created by the death, disability, retirement or resignation of an EE Holdings’ director designee, EE Holdings shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law and subject to the fiduciary duties of the board of directors, have the right to have the vacancy filled by a new EE Holdings’ director-designee. Subject to the Waiver Agreement (as described below), in the event that EE Holdings ceases to have the right to designate one or more director(s), if requested by the chairperson of our board of directors or a majority of the directors then in office, the director designee selected by EE Holdings shall resign or, if no such request is made, serve until the end of such director’s term (the “Resignation Provision”).
Subject to the fiduciary duties of the board of directors, EE Holdings also has the right to include at least two of its director designees (so long as EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) beneficially owns more than 50% of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock) or one director designee (if the beneficial ownership is at least 20% but less than or equal to 50%) on each committee of our board of directors (other than the audit committee), subject to any requirements, including independence requirements, for such committee members imposed by applicable law or by the applicable NYSE rules. In addition, subject to the fiduciary duties of the board of directors so long as EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) beneficially owns 50% or more of the then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock, EE Holdings will also have a right to designate the chairperson of our board of directors. Finally, EE Holdings has certain observer rights as long as EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) has the right to designate director-designees under the Stockholder’s Agreement.
The Stockholder’s Agreement requires that, to the extent that we are a “controlled company,” we avail ourselves of all controlled company exceptions to the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE or other exchange on which our Class A common stock is listed.
Subject to the Waiver Agreement (as described below), the Stockholder’s Agreement additionally specifies that we will not take certain significant actions specified therein (the “Specified Actions”) without the prior written consent of EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) as long as EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) beneficially owns (directly or indirectly) a specified percentage of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, reclassifications and similar transactions) (the “Consent Rights”). Specifically, as long as such ownership is at least 15% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, such Specified Actions include:
In addition, if such ownership is at least 25% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, reclassifications and similar transactions), such additional specified actions will also include:
43
All of the above-mentioned nomination and consent rights will transfer to the Foundation (including its affiliates) for five years following George B. Kaiser’s death as long as the Foundation and its affiliates (when combined with shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned by EE Holdings (including its permitted transferees) immediately prior to Mr. Kaiser’s death and bequeathed to the Foundation) meet the applicable ownership thresholds described above. Unless terminated earlier by EE Holdings, the Stockholder’s Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of EE Holdings no longer having the right to designate one or more directors under the agreement or the fifth anniversary of Mr. Kaiser’s death.
In 2024, in an opinion captioned West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company (“Moelis”), the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware declared invalid certain rights that are similar to those held by EE Holdings under the Stockholder’s Agreement. In light of the Moelis decision, on April 4, 2024, Excelerate, EELP and EE Holdings entered into a Waiver Agreement with respect to the Stockholder’s Agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”). The Waiver Agreement was effective immediately and (i) reaffirms that the board- and composition-related rights summarized above are subject to the fiduciary duties of the directors so that the board of directors and the Company need only comply with such rights to the extent doing so is consistent with the fiduciary duties that the Company’s directors have in their capacity as directors, and waives such rights to the extent necessary to reflect this reaffirmation (the “Confirmation Waivers”); (ii) waives the Resignation Provision if the director designee subject to the Resignation Provision determines in good faith that resigning is inconsistent with his or her fiduciary duties (the “Resignation Provision Waiver”), and (iii) waives the Consent Rights in respect of the Specified Actions (the “Consent Rights Waiver” and together with the Confirmation Waiver and Resignation Provision Waiver, the “Waivers”). Each of the Waivers shall terminate, and be of no further force and effect, upon the occurrence of either (a) a final judicial decision from which there is no further right of appeal (which decision need not be issued in litigation involving the Company) or (b) the enactment of a law in the State of Delaware, where, in either case, the parties to the Waiver Agreement mutually agree that the decision or the new law results in the obligations waived in the Waiver Agreement, as applicable, being enforceable absent the relevant Waiver. In addition, the Waiver Agreement provides that, if such a decision or new law requires approval of our board of directors or stockholders to have such a result, then the Company and our board of directors shall take all Necessary Action (as defined in the Stockholder’s Agreement, including to limit any required action of our board of directors to those consistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties) to obtain such approval. On January 20, 2026, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the Court of Chancery’s Moelis decision on grounds that did not address the substantive findings of the Court of Chancery that declared invalid certain rights similar to those held by EE Holdings under the Stockholders’ Agreement. Because the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision did not address the substantive findings of the Court of Chancery in Moelis, it is unclear whether the Court of Chancery’s decision invalidating stockholder rights similar to those held by EE Holdings under the Stockholder’s Agreement remains good law. Thus, the Waiver Agreement remains in effect and has not been terminated, and the Waivers continue to be operative.
Transactions with Kaiser
Prior to, or in connection with, the Reorganization and the offering, EELP and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates entered into the following transactions with Kaiser and affiliates of Kaiser.
In connection with Excelerate’s acquisition from the Foundation of FSRU Vessel (Excellence), LLC, a Marshall Islands limited liability company and the entity which holds title to the vessel Excellence, and as part of the Reorganization, Kaiser has agreed to indemnify EELP in respect of all liabilities related to the vessel Excellence arising from actions prior to Excelerate’s acquisition of FSRU Vessel (Excellence), LLC.
Northeast Gateway Related Transactions
In connection with our operation of Excelerate New England Lateral, LLC, Excelerate Northeast Gateway Energy Bridge, LP and Excelerate New England GP, LLC, Kaiser issued an uncapped construction and operational guarantee dated May 14, 2007 (the “Kaiser – MARAD Guarantee”) in favor of the Secretary of Transportation, United States of America, as represented by the Maritime Administrator (“MARAD”). Specifically the Kaiser – MARAD Guarantee guarantees Northeast Gateway Energy Bridge, LP’s obligations related to design, construction, operations and decommissioning under the deepwater port license issued by MARAD. In addition, Kaiser obtained a letter of credit in favor of MARAD to cover decommissioning costs in the amount of approximately $15.4 million (the “Kaiser – MARAD LOC”), which Kaiser – MARAD LOC was amended and increased to $18.7 million in September 2024. EELP has agreed to (i) indemnify Kaiser in respect of Kaiser’s obligations under the Kaiser-MARAD Guarantee and the
44
Kaiser – MARAD LOC, (ii) pay a nominal fee to Kaiser to maintain such Kaiser-MARAD Guarantee and (iii) reimburse Kaiser for any fees actually incurred under the MARAD LOC.
Indemnification Agreements
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), subject to certain exceptions contained in our amended and restated bylaws. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that our directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors. The indemnification agreements provide the executive officers and directors with contractual rights to indemnification, and expense advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL, subject to certain exceptions contained in those agreements.
There is no pending litigation or proceeding naming any of our directors or officers to which indemnification is being sought, and we are not aware of any pending litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director or officer.
45
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES
The following table sets forth information as of April 7, 2026 (or as of the date otherwise indicated below) regarding beneficial ownership by:
Unless otherwise noted, the mailing address of each listed beneficial owner is c/o Excelerate Energy, Inc., 2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6, The Woodlands, Texas 77381.
The number of shares beneficially owned by each entity or individual is determined under the SEC rules, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the entity or individual has sole or shared voting or investment power and also any shares that the entity or individual has the right to acquire as of June 6, 2026 (60 days after April 7, 2026) through the exercise of any stock options, through the vesting/settlement of RSUs payable in shares, or upon the exercise of other rights. Beneficial ownership excludes options or other rights vesting after June 6, 2026 and any RSUs vesting/settling, as applicable, on or before June 6, 2026 that may be payable in cash or shares at Excelerate’s election. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power (or shares such power with his or her spouse, as applicable) with respect to the shares set forth in the following table.
The number of shares of Class A common stock listed in the table below represents shares of Class A common stock directly owned, and assumes no exchange of Class B interests for Class A common stock. As described in “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Transactions in Connection with our Reorganization and Initial Public Offering—EELP Limited Partnership Agreement,” each Class B stockholder will be entitled to have their Class B interests exchanged for Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, or, at our election, for cash.
The number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock outstanding and percentage of beneficial ownership set forth below is computed on the basis of 32,073,880 shares of our Class A common stock and 82,021,389 shares of our Class B common stock issued and outstanding as of April 7, 2026.
Name of Beneficial Owner |
Class A Common Stock Owned |
|
Class B Common Stock Owned |
|
Total Voting Power in Company |
||||||
|
Number |
|
|
% |
|
Number |
|
|
% |
|
% |
Named Executive Officers and Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Kobos |
482,059 |
|
(1) |
1.50% |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Dana A. Armstrong |
53,702 |
|
(2) |
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Alisa Newman Hood |
23,986 |
|
(3) |
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
David A. Liner |
32,684 |
|
(4) |
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Oliver L. Simpson |
20,636 |
|
(5) |
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Nisha D. Biswal |
4,212 |
|
(6) |
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Deborah L. Byers |
29,065 |
|
(7) |
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Paul T. Hanrahan |
28,683 |
|
(8) |
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Don P. Millican |
6,700 |
|
|
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Tyler D. Todd |
- |
|
|
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
Robert A. Waldo |
20,833 |
|
|
* |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
All executive officers and directors as a group |
751,150 |
|
(9) |
2.34% |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
* |
46
Name of Beneficial Owner |
Class A Common Stock Owned |
|
Class B Common Stock Owned |
|
Total Voting Power in Company |
||||||
|
Number |
|
|
% |
|
Number |
|
|
% |
|
% |
Other 5% Beneficial Owners: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excelerate Energy Holdings, LLC |
— |
|
|
—% |
|
82,021,389 |
|
(10) |
100% |
|
71.89% |
George Kaiser Family Foundation |
7,854,167 |
|
(11) |
24.49% |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
6.88% |
Wellington Management Group, LLP |
3,641,087 |
|
(12) |
11.35% |
|
— |
|
|
—% |
|
3.19% |
* Represents less than one percent.
47
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
This proxy statement is being provided to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors of the Company for use at the Annual Meeting to be held on Thursday, June 4, 2026 at 9:00 AM Central Time, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Our board of directors has determined that the Annual Meeting should be held online via live audio webcast at www.proxydocs.com/EE in order to permit stockholders from any location with access to the Internet to participate.
Stockholders will be asked to consider the following proposals at the Annual Meeting:
Additionally, stockholders are entitled to vote on such other business as may properly be presented at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. We are not aware of any matters to be voted on by stockholders at the Annual Meeting other than those included in these proxy materials. If any matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your executed proxy gives your proxy holder discretionary authority to vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment with respect to the matter.
Stockholders of record of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock as of the close of business on April 7, 2026, the record date, are entitled to participate in and vote at the Annual Meeting. Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “certificate of incorporation”), holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock are each entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock will vote as a single class on all matters described in this proxy statement.
As of the record date, there were 32,073,880 shares of our Class A common stock and 82,021,389 shares of our Class B common stock issued and outstanding. Pursuant to our certificate of incorporation, holders of Class A and Class B common stock are not entitled to cumulative voting.
48
During the Annual Meeting, to participate in the Annual Meeting, including to vote, ask questions, and view the list of registered stockholders as of the record date during the meeting, stockholders of record should go to the Annual Meeting website at www.proxydocs.com/EE, enter the 12-digit control number found on your proxy card or Notice, and follow the instructions on the website.
If your shares are held in street name and your Notice or voting instruction form indicates that you may vote those shares through the http://www.proxypush.com/EE website, then you may access, participate in, and vote at the Annual Meeting with the 12-digit access code indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice. Otherwise, as mentioned above, stockholders who hold their shares in street name should contact their bank, broker or other nominee (preferably at least five days before the Annual Meeting) and obtain a “legal proxy” in order to be able to attend, participate in, or vote at the Annual Meeting.
The Annual Meeting will begin at 9:00 AM Central Time on Thursday, June 4, 2026. Online check-in will begin at approximately 8:54 AM. Central Time, and we encourage you to provide sufficient time before the Annual Meeting begins to check-in. On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you experience technical difficulties either during the check-in process or during the Annual Meeting, please call 888-491-1002. We will make a replay of the Annual Meeting available on our Investor Relations website until the next annual meeting.
Stockholders may submit questions during the Annual Meeting on the Annual Meeting website. More information regarding the question and answer process, including the number and types of questions permitted, and how questions will be recognized and answered, will be available in the meeting rules of conduct, which will be posted on the Annual Meeting website.
Our board of directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR ALL” of the nominees for director named in Proposal 1; “FOR”, approval, on a non-binding and advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers in Proposal 2; and “FOR” the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 in Proposal 3.
In order for us to conduct the Annual Meeting, a quorum, consisting of a majority of the voting power of the stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, must be present or represented by proxy. Abstentions and withhold votes are counted as “shares present” at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. Proxies submitted by brokers or other holders of record holding shares for you as a beneficial owner that do not indicate a vote for some or all of the proposals because that holder does not have voting authority and has not received voting instructions from you (so-called “broker non-votes”) are also considered “shares present” for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.
The proxy card enables you to appoint Steven M. Kobos, our Chief Executive Officer, Dana A. Armstrong, our Chief Financial Officer, and Alisa Newman Hood, our General Counsel, as your representatives at the Annual Meeting. By completing and returning the proxy card, you are authorizing such persons to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions on the proxy card. This way, your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is strongly recommended that you complete and return your proxy card before the date of the Annual Meeting in case your plans change. If a proposal comes up for vote at the Annual Meeting that is not on the proxy card, the proxies will vote your shares, under your proxy, according to their best judgment.
If you hold your shares directly in your own name, they will not be voted if you do not provide a proxy.
Your shares may be voted under certain circumstances if they are held in the name of a broker. Brokers generally have the authority, but are not required, to vote shares not voted by customers on certain “routine” matters, as determined by the NYSE. Because the ratification of an independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3) is the only matter that we expect to be considered to be “routine” at the Annual Meeting, your shares may only be voted by your broker for the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm. Whether a proposal is considered routine or non-routine is subject to NYSE rules and final determination by the NYSE. Even with respect to routine matters, some brokers are choosing not to exercise discretionary voting authority. We expect that there will be no broker non-votes (as described below) with respect to Proposal 3.
Brokers are prohibited from exercising discretionary authority on non-routine matters. We expect that the election of directors (Proposal 1) and Say-on-Pay (Proposal 2) will be considered non-routine matters, and, therefore, brokers are not expected to be able to exercise discretionary authority regarding these proposals for beneficial owners who have not returned proxies to the brokers (so-called “broker non-votes”). As mentioned above, in the case of broker non-votes, and in cases where you or the broker(s) abstain from voting on a matter when present at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, those shares will still be counted for purposes of determining if a quorum is present.
49
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. As a result, the seven nominees who receive the highest number of shares voted “For” his or her election will be elected.
Any shares voted “Withhold All” and broker non-votes, if any, will have no direct effect on his or her election. However, our board has adopted a director resignation policy, under which each director is expected to tender his or her offer to resign to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in advance of the Annual Meeting in case the director receives a greater number of votes “withheld” for the director’s election than “for” such election. If any director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” for the director’s election than “for” such election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the board whether to accept or reject the resignation offer, or whether other action should be taken. In determining whether to recommend that our board accept any resignation offer, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider all factors that the Committee’s members believe are relevant. Our board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the election results. Any director who tenders a resignation offer will not participate in the proceedings of either the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or our board with respect to such director’s own resignation offer.
Approval of Proposal 2 requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the voting power of the stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter, voting as a single class.
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against” on the outcome of Proposal 2, and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on Proposal 2.
Approval of Proposal 3 requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the voting power of the stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter, voting as a single class.
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against” on the outcome of Proposal 3. Because we expect broker discretionary voting to be permitted with respect to Proposal 3, we expect there will be no broker non-votes with respect to Proposal 3.
You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your previously delivered proxy and vote again by signing and returning a new proxy card or voting instruction form with a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting online and voting. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting online will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote at the Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering to the Company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel at 2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6, The Woodlands, Texas 77381 a written notice of revocation prior to the Annual Meeting.
Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct your broker, bank or other nominee that you wish to change your vote by following the procedures on the voting form provided to you by the broker, bank or other nominee.
If you sign your proxy card without providing further instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR ALL” of the director nominees (Proposal 1); “FOR” approval, on a non-binding and advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 2); and “FOR” the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 (Proposal 3).
The final voting results will be tallied by the inspector of election and published in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, which the Company will file with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.
The Company will bear the cost of soliciting proxies in the accompanying form and will reimburse brokerage firms and others for expenses involved in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners or soliciting their execution. In addition to solicitations by mail, the Company, through its directors and officers, may solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by electronic means. Such directors and officers will not receive any special remuneration for these efforts.
50
OTHER MATTERS
Other Business
We are not currently aware of any business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting other than the matters discussed in this proxy statement. The form of proxy accompanying this proxy statement confers discretionary authority upon the named proxy holders with respect to amendments or variations to the matters identified in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and with respect to any other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. If other matters do properly come before the Annual Meeting, or at any such adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, we expect that shares of our Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies will be voted by the proxy holders in accordance with the recommendations of our board.
Submission of Stockholder Proposals for the 2027 Annual Meeting
Rule 14a-8 Proposals. For any proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy for submission to the stockholders at our 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, it must be submitted in writing and comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. Such proposals must be received by the Company by email at corporatesecretary@excelerateenergy.com or in writing, c/o our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, at Excelerate Energy, Inc., 2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6, The Woodlands, Texas 77381 no later than the close of business on December 17, 2026.
Advance Notice Proposals and Nominations. In addition, our bylaws provide notice procedures for stockholders to nominate a person as a director and to propose business to be considered by stockholders at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders (but not for inclusion in the proxy statement). Notice of a nomination or other proposal of business must be delivered to the Company by email at corporatesecretary@excelerateenergy.com or in writing, c/o our Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Excelerate Energy, Inc., 2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6, The Woodlands, Texas 77381 no later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 30 days after such anniversary date, to be timely notice by the stockholder must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made by us. Accordingly, for our 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, notice of a nomination or proposal must be delivered to us no earlier than the close of business on February 4, 2027 and no later than the close of business on March 6, 2027. Nominations and proposals also must satisfy other requirements set forth in the bylaws. In addition to satisfying the deadlines in the advance notice provisions of our bylaws, a stockholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of nominees submitted under these advance notice provisions must provide the notice required under Rule 14a-19 to our Executive Vice President and General Counsel no later than April 5, 2027.
For purposes of these proposals, “close of business” shall mean 6:00 p.m. local time at the principal executive offices of the Company on any calendar day, whether or not the day is a business day.
Householding Information
Unless we have received contrary instructions, we may send a single copy of the Notice or this proxy statement to any household at which two or more stockholders reside. This process, known as “householding,” reduces the volume of duplicate information received at any one household, helps to reduce our expenses, and benefits the environment. However, if stockholders prefer to receive multiple sets of our disclosure documents at the same address this year or in future years, the stockholders should follow the instructions described below. Similarly, if an address is shared with another stockholder and together, both of the stockholders would like to receive only a single set of our disclosure documents, the stockholders should follow these instructions: If the shares are registered in the name of the stockholder, the stockholder should notify us by email at corporatesecretary@excelerateenergy.com, by telephone at 1-832-813-7100, or in writing, c/o our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, at Excelerate Energy, Inc., 2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6, The Woodlands, Texas 77381 to inform us of his or her request. If a broker holds the shares, the stockholder should contact such broker directly.
Where You Can Find More Information
We file annual and quarterly reports and other reports and information with the SEC. We distribute to our stockholders annual reports containing financial statements audited by our independent registered public accounting firm and, upon request, quarterly reports for the first three quarters of each fiscal year containing unaudited financial information. In addition, the reports and other information are filed through Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system and are publicly available on the SEC’s website, located at http://www.sec.gov.
We will provide without charge to you, upon written or oral request, a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, including the financial statements and schedules. Any requests for copies of information, reports or other filings with the SEC should be directed to the Executive Vice President and General Counsel, at Excelerate Energy, Inc., 2445 Technology Forest Blvd., Level 6, The Woodlands, Texas 77381. The Annual Report and this proxy statement are also available online at https://ir.excelerateenergy.com/financials/sec-filings.
51
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be Held on June 4, 2026:
The Notice of 2026 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and 2025 Annual Report are available
at www.proxydocs.com/EE.
We will be conducting our 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders virtually
at www.proxydocs.com/EE.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —