Please stand by. Good day and welcome to the GCM Grosvenor Fourth Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this call will be recorded. I would now like to hand the call over to Stacie Selinger, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you. Good morning and welcome to GCM Grosvenor's fourth quarter and full year 2021 earnings call. Today I am joined by GCM Grosvenor's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michael Sacks; President, Jon Levin; and Chief Financial Officer Pam Bentley. Before we discuss this quarter's results, a reminder that all statements made on this call that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements. This includes statements regarding our current expectations for the business, our financial performance, and projections. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that may cause our actual results or performance to be materially different from any of our expectations of future results. Please refer to the factors discussed in the Risk Factors section of our 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31st, 2020, our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and our earnings release available on the Public Shareholder section of our website. These factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements on this call. We'll also refer to non-GAAP measures that we view as important in assessing the performance of our business. A reconciliation of non-GAAP metrics to the nearest GAAP metric can be found in our earnings presentation and earnings supplement, both of which are available on the Public Shareholder section of our website. Our goal is to continually improve how we communicate with and engage with our shareholders. In that spirit, we look forward to your feedback. Thank you again for joining us. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Michael.

Thank you, Stacie. Our business performed really well in the fourth quarter and for the full year of 2021. As you can see on slide three, we met or exceeded consensus and our own guidance for fundraising revenue growth and profitability. Importantly, we added value to client portfolios enjoying good investment results across our various verticals. For the fourth quarter and full year of 2021 as compared to the fourth quarter and full year of 2020, we grew fee-related revenue by 17% and 12%, fee-related earnings by 37% and 27%, adjusted EBITDA by 19% and 22%, and adjusted net income by 23% and 31%. Based on the strength of these results, our Board has increased our stock and warrant buyback program by an additional $20 million. The strength of 2021 has set us up well for 2022. And we reiterate our 2022 guidance for fee-related revenue growth of 12% to 15% and fee-related earnings growth of 20% to 25%. Last year's success was led by $9.4 billion of fundraising across the firm. Our fundraising was highly diversified across vertical, geography, client channel, and account structure as you can see on slides four and five. On slide five, we provided more information on specialized fundraising that we hope you find helpful. In 2021, we raised $1.5 billion for diverse managers. That total was comprised of $1 billion for our private equity vertical and $500 million for our real estate vertical. The $1 billion of diverse manager capital raised for our private equity vertical includes a successful first fundraise of $770 million for our advanced fund. We look forward to delivering good results for advanced fund investors, bringing successor advanced funds to market, and growing that fund series over time. Infrastructure captured the largest share of our overall fundraising at $3.5 billion last year, both our non-institutional or retail fundraising and our ESG and impact fundraising were important contributors. We believe both of these areas provide opportunity for significant growth going forward. Absolute return strategies had net flows in 2021 that were flat, and that was and remains our base case assumption. While 2021 strong fundraising and fee-paying AUM growth provide strong momentum for 2022, it's also important to look at the growth in our incentive fee opportunity that occurred last year. On slide 10, you can see that our run-rate annual performance fees increased by 15% this past year, while the firm's share of carry at net asset value grew by $34 million or 11% in the fourth quarter and $198 million or 149% for the full year. The firm's investments also grew, increasing by $25 million or 22% in the fourth quarter and $58 million or 72% for the year. Importantly, in the fourth quarter and for the year, the firm captured a higher share of the increase in carry at net asset value, which should continue over time as our larger ownership of later carry vintages comes through. Looking at 2022, we like what we see. Our fundraising pipeline is larger than the one we enjoyed a year ago. We start the year with more business development resources than we have ever had before, and we have four specialized funds with solid track records in market, none of which are first-time funds. The key drivers of our 2022 FRR growth are pretty straightforward. Our 12% to 15% guidance means that we need $42 million to $52 million of FRR. We enter the year with approximately $17 million to $20 million of that growth, pretty secure as it relates to the full-year impact of our 2021 fundraising and the normal operation of our CNYFPAUM less distributions. That leaves us with $25 million to $32 million of FRR growth to achieve, and we get that from $3.5 billion to $4.5 billion of funds raised into FPAUM. Our plan has us raising those funds roughly equally between specialized funds and custom separate accounts. Just as 2021's success set us up with all for 2022, repeating that success in 2022 will set us up well for 2023. Looking at slide 11, you can see the various opportunities that we think have legs and give us confidence regarding the future. Consequently, we believe our FRR can continue to grow in 2023 and beyond as it did in 2021 and as we have guided for 2022. In closing, I want to say that I think our stock affords good value at these levels. As of Friday's close, we were trading at 15.6 times trailing FRE and 14.4 times trailing adjusted net income. We had a 4.4% dividend yield. We have solid growth prospects, and we've been around for a while. Someone once said to me that when looking at PE ratios, it's management's job to drive the E and the PE will sort itself out. We continue to see a lot of opportunity for Grosvenor, and we're focused on driving the E. And with that, I'll turn it over to Jon.

Thank you, Michael. As Michael said in his remarks, it was a strong year for the firm in which we successfully drove returns for clients and harnessed the platform's flexibility to deliver solutions to clients across the full spectrum of alternatives. Our first job is to deliver strong risk-adjusted returns for our clients on an absolute and relative basis. We were pleased to deliver on that front, and what was admittedly a positive environment for risk assets. Gross performance for Absolute Return Strategies was 7.2% for the year and 9.3% annualized over the last three years, which means we exceeded client objectives and also generated significant alpha. We think the environment of heightened volatility and increasing interest rates sets us up well for Absolute Return Strategies generally. Even though January was negative for performance, it was in line with their expectations, given the broader market sell-off. Moving to our Strategic Investments Group, it's just a really exciting story. We have a unique origination engine, and we are leveraging it well to deliver for our clients. As a reminder, the SIG group pursues opportunistic direct and co-investments sourced in some way, shape, or form from the full breadth of the firm's open architecture, multi-alternatives platform. We primarily run three strategies out of this group: a more liquid strategy we call the special opportunities fund; a longer duration, private equity-like strategy, which we refer to as the Mac franchise; and a credit-only capability, which we call strategic credit. Returns across each strategy last year and since inception are fantastic. More broadly across private markets, we saw strong performance in every strategy, which in addition to delivering value to our clients caused total unrealized carry to double during the year. Private equity had exceptional returns last year, returning more than 30%. This includes our most recent vintages for our secondaries and co-investment funds, setting those funds up well for strong overall performance. Our real estate vertical typically pursues value-add or opportunistic-type investments through partnerships with smaller fund managers, our operating partners. After a period of modest impact from the pandemic, we have seen a strong returns recovery and are quite excited about the forecast of returns for our clients in those strategies. In infrastructure, we generally target longer-date time horizons and lower return targets than in PE and real estate. We are pleased that even through the pandemic, we have continued to deliver on our goals, generating low single-digit cash yields and low double-digit net returns for clients. Michael spoke about 2022, and I want to dive a bit deeper on two areas that were significant drivers of our growth last year. First, infrastructure was the largest contributor to our fundraising, with $3.5 billion of capital raised. Infrastructure assets under management increased 34% in 2021 to $9.1 billion, the highest AUM increase in any strategy. The combination of cash yield generation, long-dated capital appreciation, inflation protection, and a generally growing market opportunity has led to significant growth in infrastructure appetite globally. Layered on top of that is the natural opportunity to drive ESG and impact initiatives through infrastructure capital deployment. We think this is only the beginning of this market's evolution. Our infrastructure platform is ideally positioned to benefit from these dynamics. In an asset class with a longer time horizon, having a long-standing track record is paramount and we've been investing for two decades and have a cycle-tested track record. We have experienced scale and deep relationships in multiple ways to implement our investment ideas, investing through the full range of primaries, secondaries, co-investments, and directs. In an increasingly in-demand strategy, our platform-based approach provides a comprehensive solution to investors seeking diversified global exposure to infrastructure. The second driver, which we see accelerating and is important, is investors' focus on co-investment, secondaries, and direct investments. Our platform for these complementary strategies benefits from our scale and relationships. The intelligence and insight into thousands of fund managers we actively track and invest with are critical to this effort. Further, successfully executing transactions requires experienced and deep teams that can move efficiently to complete transactions. The market increasingly recognizes the strength of this value proposition, which has resulted in significantly higher flows into these areas. Last year, for example, 70% of our flows into private equity were into these transaction-oriented investments. We see this dynamic persisting, which has the opportunity to impact not only our flows but also our revenues. The economics to us for co-investing, secondary, and direct investing are accretive to our business while importantly still representing a compelling economic value proposition to investors. And, of course, we can only win when our clients win. Each quarter, we will attempt to address a couple of the key themes driving the business, and there are many exciting stories to tell. Now I'll turn the call over to Pam to address our financial performance.

Thank you, Jon. We are very pleased with our results for the fourth quarter and full year, and enter 2022 in a position of strength with highly attractive tailwinds. Fee-related revenue grew 17% for the quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 2020 and 12% year-over-year, both in line with or ahead of our guidance and indicative of the continued momentum in capital formation and investment performance. As Michael mentioned, the growth in fee-paying AUM combined with our anticipated activation of contracted, not yet fee-paying AUM yields approximately 6% of fee-related revenue growth in 2022, nearly half of what we have guided before any incremental fundraising. And as Jon noted, we continue to see a very strong market for capital formation across the full breadth of the platform. A primary driver of this dynamic is our private market specialized fundraising, which we perceive as a meaningful contributor to revenue next year. Catch-up management fees associated with these funds compound over time, so typically are higher in the back half of the year. To that point, catch-up fees in the fourth quarter of 2021 were $4.3 million, the highest of any quarter during the year. In the first quarter of 2022, we do not anticipate any significant specialized fund closings. Therefore, there will be limited to no catch-up fees in Q1, and we expect first quarter fee-related revenue to be almost $3 million lower than the fourth quarter. As was the case in 2021, we expect our 12% to 15% revenue growth to be non-linear and weighted heavily toward the back half of 2022. Our fee rates continue to be very stable across the business, a sign of our value proposition resonating in the market. We also continue to experience a mix shift towards higher fee activities, such as co-investments, direct investments, and secondaries. Mid last year, we noted that we expected our administration fees would level off at less than $1 million per quarter, and we expect that to occur starting in the first quarter of 2022. As a reminder, we provide administrative services primarily to private markets clients for over a quarter of a trillion dollars in assets. This is an ancillary service we offer to many of our clients, which has significant benefits in the form of client retention and data. Our fee-related earnings compensation of $39.1 million was relatively flat in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter of 2021 and less than 2% higher than the fourth quarter of 2020. As we discussed last quarter, we have aligned a greater portion of our compensation with achievement of investment performance and resulting incentive fees, given the growing incentive fee earnings power that Michael mentioned. With the broader inflationary environment, we expect fee-related earnings compensation to increase by 6% to 8% in 2022, which is already incorporated into our fee-related earnings guidance and anticipated margin expansion. Non-GAAP general and administrative and other expenses were $17.3 million in the quarter, in line with the third quarter levels and again, lower than normalized level due to COVID impact on travel and office-related expenses. As activity in that regard has already begun to return, we expect increases in general and administrative expenses in the first quarter that will continue to modestly increase through the rest of the year. Importantly, this trend is already factored into our fee-related earnings growth guidance of 20% to 25% and the implied margin expansion that goes along with that. Our fee-related earnings margin was 35% in 2021, up from 31% a year ago. Given significant operating leverage in our platform, we foresee continued margin expansion in 2022 and beyond. Turning to incentive fees. I won't repeat Michael's comments other than to emphasize the broader trend that the growth in our incentive fee earnings power is accelerating. As a reminder, realized carried interest is difficult to predict and historically has been most significant in the back half of each year. Similarly, the majority of annual performance fees crystallize in the fourth quarter of each year based on annual investment performance. Consequently, and as I mentioned earlier, we had an opportunity to better align our cash incentive fee compensation framework last quarter, which created more stability in our fee-related earnings compensation while further aligning our team with the interests of our clients and shareholders. Importantly, the right way to look at our cash incentive fee compensation is relative to our firm share of incentive fees, which are net of contractual obligations. This is most clearly shown on slide 10. As we've noted in the past, we expect to retain 50% to 60% of the firm's share of incentive fees in 2022. Turning to stock compensation, the vast majority of this continues to relate to awards made in conjunction with our transaction to go public. The second third of those awards vest in March of 2022 and the last third vest in March of 2023. Outside of that original transaction grant, we expect 2022 dilution to total shares outstanding from normal course restricted stock awards to be minimal, around two-tenths of a percent. The business continues to generate strong cash flow. As you'll see on slide 12, our cash balance at quarter-end was $96 million. As Michael noted, we have increased our stock repurchase plan to $45 million, of which we have spent more than $9 million in 2021. We continue to view the repurchase of shares and warrants as an attractive use of cash in creating shareholder value. So anticipate a continuation of our repurchase activities. Finally, we have often cited strong free cash flow generation and the ability to return capital to shareholders as attractive features of our business. Last quarter, we increased our dividend to $0.10 per share, and this quarter we are maintaining that dividend, which will be payable on March 15th to shareholders of record on March 1st. We continue to be excited by the positive trend of the business and the significant earnings power we are creating. Thank you again for joining us, and we're now happy to take your questions.

Thank you. Our first question will come from Ken Worthington with JP Morgan.

Hi, good morning. First, I'd love to get an update on the insurance side of the business. If I recall correctly, you closed I think $500 million in insurance solutions in 3Q and sort of the inaugural close. And if I'm backing into numbers correctly, it looks like there may be some additional in 4Q. So, can you talk about any milestones reached during the fourth quarter? And how we should think about the pipeline for that business going forward?

Sure. Thanks, Ken. We have, as you know, high hopes for that insurance channel. We've made a couple of additional hires there since our first hire and since launching that. I think that the third quarter success that you mentioned was, in a way, early and larger than anybody should have been expecting. We did have some modest success in the fourth quarter, but not something that I would signal or say as a milestone or of the magnitude of the success that you reference. Our pipeline there is full, our activity set is significant and robust, and we are enjoying the type of interaction, exchange, and opportunity that we thought we saw when we committed to the space. So, I would expect for that to grow. It's one of the things that we think will help us make our 2022 numbers. It's one of the reasons we're confident putting out some thoughts on 2023, and I'd expect it to continue to grow pretty consistently throughout 2022 and 2023 and beyond.

Okay. Great. Thank you. And I forgot to thank you when I started for the additional disclosure. Amazing, super helpful. So, thank you there. Just for sort of a follow-up question on the absolute return business. I guess, maybe my opinion was the hedge fund industry had kind of a mediocre year in 2021, and it looks to me like Grosvenor performed pretty much in line with that. You did nail your projections on the business, all different parts of your projection. But given the backdrop for market conditions, I guess maybe today and the hedge fund environment, what are you doing to make Grosvenor better than breakeven for sales else for 2022 and beyond? Like, I heard your guidance for breakeven, but I assume you're kind of working behind the scenes to hopefully do better than that. So, what are you doing and what are sort of the opportunities there? And with the equity market and interest rate environment where they are to begin 2022, do those help or hurt the outlook for net sales and interest in absolute return as we sort of move through the year?

Great. So, thanks. I just want to start with, as Jon mentioned in his comments, for one-and-three-year periods, and frankly, even if you go look at a five-year period, our results are in line with or exceed client expectations. So, it's always important to remember what the investors are looking for when they make commitments, what that risk-reward profile is, and then how are we doing relative to that risk-reward profile. And we're doing well in that regard. So, while those returns may look a bit lackluster compared to the tremendous returns we've seen from the equity markets, they are actually exceeding the objectives of the client base, which is obviously incredibly important. I want to make sure to point that out. Generally, as we've said before, market conditions where there's a lot of volatility, where the markets aren't one way, where there's more uncertainty, those tend to be better environments for alternative strategies and better environments for hedge portfolios. We tend to have less volatility in our returns than traditional portfolios do. So, I think that that's a decent backdrop for us and for the strategy set. The last thing I just want to remind everybody of is that within absolute return, we have different strategies. We have different offerings, and some of our offerings, in particular, our Strategic Investments Group offering has performed quite well in tough markets and has really added value. So, we are optimistic that we can see some growth in that offering, and you've all noticed that the fees in that space have stayed stable for some time now. We're not moving off our base case assumptions. We're obviously to your point, Ken, working all the time to drive flows and grow assets there through additions and new hires. But we're staying with that base case assumption, and we think we can generate good growth with the base case assumption.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

And our next question comes from Chris Kotowski with Oppenheimer and Company.

Good morning. Thank you. Last year, you mentioned plans to raise $7.5 billion across six funds. Are these the six funds listed on page five? When I total the figures presented, it amounts to about $2.5 billion so far. Is this aligning with your expectations from last year?

We feel very positive about our overall fundraising efforts. Our specialized fundraising is going well, and the same goes for our separate account fundraising. I noted that our pipeline has grown compared to last year, and we have significantly increased our presence on the ground. Overall, we are optimistic about our situation, and we wanted to give you more detailed information to help you understand the funds better. From our perspective, everything is progressing quite well.

Okay. Great. And then, last year you were saying, expect the fundraising to be backend loaded. If I understood your comments right, you kind of thought this year is going to be more rateable across the quarters. Did I get that correctly?

I want to ensure we emphasize this point clearly. The timing of our fundraising is closely tied to when we have specialized fund closes. As mentioned during the call, we do not expect any significant closes in Q1, so more fundraising is anticipated in Q2. However, when we discuss being backend loaded, it pertains more to the revenue build rather than the fundraising itself. Even if fundraising occurs consistently throughout the year, the revenue pattern indicates growth will be more pronounced in the latter half of the year, specifically in the third and fourth quarters. Consequently, our revenue growth will mirror last year's trend, leaning towards the end of the year.

Okay. And then, I guess, last thing on the fundraising. Looking at slide five, which is really interesting, and just from all the companies we look at generally, private equity is bigger than infrastructure. Is this what you would've guessed at the beginning of last year, that infrastructure would be significantly larger than private equity, or did that strike you as surprising?

Go ahead, Jon.

Yeah. I was just going to say, Chris, this is Jon. We felt good about the fundraising landscape as we entered the year, and Michael highlighted this. The past couple of years have seen a lot of activity in infrastructure for us. We came into 2021 with a strong pipeline, and we have a strong pipeline for 2022 as well. Therefore, it wasn’t surprising for us to see the interest in this space, which has been evident for us and others. I believe our platform is particularly strong, given its longevity and proven track record, including various implementation methods. I expect we will continue to see a significant amount of activity in the infrastructure sector.

And for you infrastructure here, it it's in particular, I should think U.S., or I should think power and transmission pipelines, that kind of thing.

I think from a sector standpoint, you should think about multiple parts of the infrastructure space, sub-sector standpoint, so transportation, social, renewable, et cetera. From a geography standpoint, you should think about it being roughly equally balanced between the U.S. and Europe. But we've also actually seen a small pickup in Asia infrastructure activity in recent periods.

Okay. Great. All right. That's it for me. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question will come from Adam Beatty with UBS.

Good morning. Thank you for the question. I really appreciate all the information provided, especially on slide five. Focusing on the separate account channel, the pace of fundraising appears to be quite steady. I'd like to understand your perspective on the outlook for re-ups and client demand. Do you think this pace will continue, or perhaps even pick up this year? Thank you.

Thanks, Adam. Our pipeline is larger today than it was a year ago. Our re-up rates have been excellent, and we expect them to continue to be excellent. I don't see any reason for a change in that pattern as we move forward.

Excellent. Thank you. And then, just on the retail distribution, just wanted to get maybe a little more detail around your strategy there. What channels, and maybe either third-party facilitators or intermediaries that might be important for your success there? Thanks.

Thank you. To date, it's been predominantly high net worth and working with wealth management platforms. We think we've got a lot of room to drive that and so, we are super happy to see north of 10% of our fundraising coming from that channel as compared to 5% or so of our AUM with frankly, in our opinion, a lot of ability still in front of us to continue to drive that channel. As we said, we think for 2022 and for 2023 and beyond, we think there's a lot of promise there.

And that does conclude the question-and-answer session. Ms. Selinger, I now turn the conference back over to you.

Thank you. And thank you again to everybody for joining us today. We appreciate the continued interest. If you have follow-up questions or feedback, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you again.

Thank you. And that does conclude today's conference. We do thank you for your participation. Have an excellent day.