Skip to main content

Hp Inc Q1 FY2023 Earnings Call

Hp Inc (HPQ)

Earnings Call FY2023 Q1 Call date: 2023-02-28 Concluded

Call artefacts

Transcript

Speaker-labelled transcript of the call.

Read transcript
8-K earnings release

Item 2.02 release filed around the call (2023-02-28).

View 8-K filing
10-Q filing

The quarterly report covering this quarter (filed 2023-03-01).

View 10-Q filing
Audio

Call audio is not captured yet.

Slides

A slide deck is not captured yet.

Transcript

Auto-generated speakers
Operator

Good day, everyone, and welcome to the First Quarter 2023 HP Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Lisa, and I will be your conference moderator for today's call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the call over to Orit Keinan-Nahon, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Orit Keinan-Nahon Head of Investor Relations

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to HP's First Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. With me today are Enrique Lores, HP's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Marie Myers, HP's Chief Financial Officer. Before handing the call over to Enrique, let me remind you that this call is a webcast and a replay will be available on our website shortly after the call for approximately one year. We posted the earnings release and accompanying slide presentation on our Investor Relations web page at investor.hp.com. As always, elements of this presentation are forward-looking and are based on our best view of the world and our businesses as we see them today. For more detailed information, please see disclaimers in the earnings materials relating to forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. For a discussion of some of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, please refer to HP's SEC reports, including our most recent Form 10-K. HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update any such forward-looking statements. We also note that the financial information discussed on this call reflects estimates based on information available now and could differ materially from the amounts ultimately reported in HP's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2023, and HP's other SEC filings. During this webcast, unless otherwise specifically noted, all comparisons are year-over-year comparisons with the corresponding year-ago period. In addition, unless otherwise noted, references to HP channel inventory refer to Tier 1 channel inventory. For financial information that has been expressed on a non-GAAP basis, we've included reconciliations to the comparable GAAP information. Please refer to the tables and slide presentation accompanying today's earnings release for those reconciliations. With that, I'd now like to turn the call over to Enrique.

Thank you, Orit, and thank you to everyone for joining today. Since our Q4 call last November, the macro volatility we described has continued. Our approach remains consistent. We are taking decisive actions to improve our performance while continuing to invest in long-term growth. By doing what we said we would do, we delivered on our Q1 EPS guidance. And we are reaffirming our full-year outlook. Today, I'm going to focus my comments on three areas: I will begin by summarizing our results and progress against our future-ready plan. I will then cover our business unit performance. And I will conclude with our outlook before handing the call to Marie. Starting with our results. Net revenue was $13.8 billion in the quarter. That's down 19% nominally and 15% in constant currency. This reflects industry-wide headwinds, including corporate budget tightening that has started to impact large enterprise demand. Despite this top-line pressure, we delivered non-GAAP EPS of $0.75. This is in line with our previously provided outlook, and it reflects the actions we are taking on cost as well as disciplined execution on pricing and mix. The future-ready plan we shared with you last quarter is already having an impact. As a reminder, the plan has two primary objectives. One is to further reduce our cost structure. The second is to continue to assess and optimize our overall portfolio and to develop the required operational capabilities to deliver long-term sustainable growth. We are making clear progress in both areas. In terms of costs, our teams have done an excellent job reducing spend and driving efficiencies. We delivered on our Q1 cost target, and we are on track to deliver at least 40% of our three-year savings by the end of fiscal year '23. This is allowing us to maintain our investments in long-term growth. Collectively, our key growth businesses grew double digits in Q1, including Poly. We're investing in a down market so we can accelerate our growth when the external environment improves. For example, new hybrid work models are fueling demand for peripherals and other collaboration solutions. We will now refer to this part of our business as hybrid systems. Our hybrid systems business more than doubled year-over-year, and our Poly integration is going very well. The combined HP and Poly portfolio is creating better experiences for customers and building a strong funnel. Hybrid work is a long-term secular trend driving innovation across our portfolio. We introduced more than 25 new products that earned over 50 innovation awards at CES. This included our new Dragonfly Pro series, which we co-engineered with AMD. It reflects how we are building deeper partnerships with our silicon partners to co-create better experiences for customers. In addition, we launched our new Poly Voyager wireless earbuds, which, with three mics per earbud, deliver higher quality voice transmission and audio experiences. We are also doubling down on services and subscriptions. There is a growing demand for new consumption models that allow us to deliver a better value proposition. And we have created dedicated teams to drive greater focus on these growth opportunities. This supports our strategy to foster lifetime customer relationships and drive recurring revenue. Last year, we created our Workforce Services & Solutions organization. It is providing customers with an integrated set of offerings and expanding our addressable market. We delivered healthy WSS revenue growth in Q1, and we drove margin expansion by shifting more of our mix to digital services and achieving cost efficiencies. We are excited about the opportunities ahead. Our investments in software, security, and AI will enable us to develop new solutions. For example, our HP workstations and data science stack is accelerating machine learning and AI workflows, which is leading to the creation of a new category of high-performance PCs specifically designed for data science and AI applications. We are partnering closely with NVIDIA on new products and platforms for this growing use case. And this quarter, we also created a new organization focused on consumer subscriptions. It's designed to expand upon the success of Instant Ink. Our long-term goal is to ultimately offer the HP portfolio as a subscription. Let me now touch on our business unit performance, starting with Personal Systems. At the market level, we continue to see soft demand in consumer and commercial. We also see pricing pressure given elevated channel inventory across the industry. In addition, corporate budget tightening began to affect large enterprise demand. This is leading to longer sales cycles in our commercial business. Against that backdrop, Personal Systems revenue was $9.2 billion. That's down 24% or 20% in constant currency. Rollout to our customers was higher than selling to the channel with a corresponding reduction in channel inventory. Our estimate is that end-user demand was stronger than revenue shipments. PS operating margin was better than expected at 5.4%, and we grew operating profit sequentially. This reflects our actions on cost and a favorable mix shift improving our performance. We accelerated the growth of our hybrid systems and PS services businesses, and we remain focused on growing profitable share. In calendar Q4, we grew share sequentially in the high-value segments we have prioritized. Our commercial PC share increased by 2.8 points, and our overall PC share grew by 2.5 points as we regained the #1 or #2 position in all regions. Turning to Print. Current market conditions are more stable, and we see different dynamics playing out by business. The consumer print market continues to see demand softness and pricing pressure. In supplies, the situation in Q1 was better than expected and we continue to see strong adoption of profit upfront and subscription models. The commercial print market is being impacted by macro uncertainty, corporate budget tightening and the uneven pace of return to office. Within commercial, office printing has seen improvement as the supply situation normalizes. Taking all this into account, our Q1 Print revenue was $4.6 billion. That's down 4.5% or 2% in constant currency. We delivered Print operating margin of 18.9%. Operating profit was flat year-over-year in a very tough market. This shows that our strategy is working. Disciplined cost management and favorable pricing in office had a positive impact. Our office hardware revenue grew 13% year-over-year or 5% sequentially, and we gained share in office quarter-over-quarter in calendar Q4. Although return to office is uneven, the pages per device remain in the range of 80% of pre-COVID expected levels. We also continued to rebalance system profitability. HP+ and big tank printers represented 56% of printer shipments in Q1, and we gained share sequentially in big tank. We now offer the industry's broadest lineup of tanks from the low end of the market to the world's first and only laser tank printer. We delivered double-digit revenue growth in Instant Ink, surpassing 12 million subscribers. We drove early adoption of our Instant Ink with paper add-on. Industrial graphics and 3D were impacted by macro headwinds, with revenue down year-over-year. We view this as a short-term situation, and we plan to continue investing in these areas to drive long-term growth and value creation. This quarter, we expanded our Jet Fusion lineup and we drove adoption of our metal jet solution with key customers such as John Deere and Schneider Electric. Across our business, sustainable impact remains at the core of our strategy and our leadership on important topics like climate change, human rights, and digital equity is building trust in our brand, and it's helping us win new business. It's also driving innovation. Our new all-in-one lineup is a great example. It includes the world's first PC with recycled coffee grounds, which are used in the finish of the device. The enclosure is made with more than 40% post-consumer recycled plastics. The arm stand uses 75% recycled aluminum, and the stand base uses 100% reclaimed polyester. We have also reduced the product's packaging, so we can ship up to 66% more units per pallet. I am proud we were recently named America's Most Responsible Company by Newsweek for the fourth consecutive year. Let me turn to capital allocation. As we said last quarter, we plan to maintain our current capital allocation approach, and we are applying the same framework we have used for the last few years. We are committed to returning 100% of free cash flow to shareholders over time, unless opportunities with a better return on investment arise. And as long as our gross leverage ratio remains under 2x EBITDA. Given the volatility of the market and our growing contractual business, we believe it's important to maintain a healthy balance sheet through prudent financial management. Therefore, we moderated our share repurchase activity in Q1 as planned while maintaining a leverage ratio within our target range. Looking ahead, we are not expecting a significant economic recovery during fiscal year 2023. We continue to expect our second half performance to improve relative to the first half, driven by our cost-saving measures and as the improved channel inventory levels create a more normalized pricing environment. This is consistent with the view we shared in November. The PC market in units may regress to pre-COVID levels in the short term, but we expect it will remain at a structurally higher level with more premium and high-value mix. As we said last quarter, we expect the overall print market to be down low single digits this year. This is mainly driven by the challenging macro environment and slower-than-expected return to the office. And as I said at the top of the call, we are maintaining our full-year financial outlook. To sum up, we are operating in a tough market right now. But we are taking decisive actions as part of our future-ready plan to improve our performance, and we remain confident in our ability to deliver. By focusing on what we can control, we believe we are well positioned to navigate near-term volatility. And by maintaining investments in our growth priorities, we are strengthening the company for the future. This is what we did in Q1, and it's what you can expect from us moving forward. Let me now hand the call over to Marie for more details.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. As Enrique said, we continue to focus on what we can control and deliver on the commitments we have made. In Q1, we remained disciplined in rigorously managing our costs and investing strategically while delivering on our outlook. However, our results were impacted by ongoing soft demand. Macroeconomic challenges persisted, and corporate budget tightening began to affect large enterprise demand this quarter. We are adapting quickly to the current environment, but see continued opportunity to drive further improvement in our cost structure and operational execution. Let me give you a closer look at the details. Net revenue was $13.8 billion in the quarter, down 19% nominally and 15% in constant currency, driven by the declines across each of our regions. In constant currency, Americas declined 16%, EMEA declined 15%, and APJ declined 13%. Gross margin was 20.3% in the quarter, up 0.4 points year-on-year, primarily due to improved commodities and favorable print mix, partially offset by competitive pricing, including currency. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $1.7 billion or 12.5% of revenue. The decrease in operating expenses was driven primarily by lower variable compensation, rigorous cost management, and favorable currency impacts, partially offset by the Poly acquisition. Non-GAAP operating profit was $1.1 billion, down 28.3%. Non-GAAP net OI&E expense was $183 million, up primarily due to higher interest expense driven by an increase in both debt outstanding and interest rates. Non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share decreased $0.35 or 32% to $0.75, with a diluted share count of approximately 1 billion shares. Non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share excludes a net expense totaling $262 million, primarily related to restructuring and other charges, amortization of intangibles, acquisition and divestiture-related charges, debt extinguishment costs, and other tax adjustments, partially offset by nonoperating retirement-related credits. As a result, Q1 GAAP diluted net earnings per share was $0.49. Now let's turn to segment performance. Let me start with pointing out that we have changed our revenue reporting presentation for Personal Systems this quarter. We are now reporting revenue by business capability, consumer and commercial, versus our previous disclosure by product category, which better aligns with how we think about and manage the business. The composition of our consumer and commercial business capabilities remains consistent with what we have outlined in the past, with the exception of Poly, which is now included in commercial. Also note that Q1 reflects the first full quarter of Poly results. In Q1, Personal Systems revenue was $9.2 billion, down 24% or 20% in constant currency, with FX headwinds as expected. Total units were down 28% with declines in both consumer and commercial, driven by soft demand and a tough prior-year compare. And while commercial constituted about 60% of our units, it represented approximately 70% of our revenue mix for the quarter. We made solid progress on reducing our channel inventory levels sequentially. However, levels remained elevated for us and across the industry. With that, combined with improved supply availability, pricing competition intensified incrementally in the quarter. Our backlog remains consistent with prepandemic levels and still skews favorably towards commercial higher-value units. Drilling into the details, consumer revenue was down 36% and commercial was down 18%. Lower volumes, FX, and increased promotional pricing were again headwinds. Within commercial, these were partially offset by favorable mix. During calendar Q4, we improved our go-to-market execution and grew our overall market share sequentially. We also increased our market share in high-value, more profitable segments, including commercial, desktops, and notebooks. Our focus continues to be on driving profitable share growth, especially in the premium segment of our consumer and commercial markets. Personal Systems delivered almost $500 million of operating profit with operating margins of 5.4%. Our margin declined 2.4 points year-over-year, primarily due to currency headwinds, increased promotional pricing, and favorable prior period R&D partner funding. This was partially offset by Poly contributions and lower costs, including variable compensation and commodity costs. In Print, our results reflect our focus on execution and growing our NPV positive units as well as the strength of our portfolio as we navigate the supply chain environment. In Q1, total Print revenue was $4.6 billion, down 5% nominally or 2% in constant currency. The decline was driven mostly by lower supplies revenue and currency. Hardware revenue was relatively flat, driven by favorable pricing actions in Commercial, partially offset by unfavorable mix and competitive pricing actions. Industrial Graphics and services revenue declined slightly, reflecting emerging demand weakness in the enterprise space. Total hardware units increased 2% as component availability and logistics constraints improved sequentially, augmented by better-than-expected China demand. We continued to make solid progress reducing our backlog and are largely back to our pre-pandemic level. By customer segment, Commercial revenue increased 2% or 5% in constant currency, with units down 8%. Consumer revenue was down 3% or up 1% in constant currency with units up 3%. Consumer printer demand remained soft in the Americas and EMEA regions, driving incremental promotional activity as supply constraints continue to ease. Commercial hardware demand remained tepid due to both the slow and uneven pace at which the return to office is progressing and enterprise budget tightening. Supplies revenue was $2.9 billion, declining 7% nominally and 6% in constant currency. The decline was driven primarily by further normalization in home printing and a gradual recovery in Commercial. This was partially offset by favorable pricing actions and continued market share gains in ink and toner. Print operating profit was $870 million, essentially flat year-over-year and operating margin was 18.9%. Operating margin increased 0.8 points driven by pricing actions and cost improvements, partially offset by promotional pricing of favorable currency and higher commodity costs. The cost improvements were largely due to lower variable comp expense management and transformation savings. Now let me turn to our future-ready efforts. We saw strong progress on our plan in Q1 and are on track to deliver at least 40% of our targeted $1.4 billion in gross annual run rate structural cost savings by the end of FY '23. In Personal Systems, we are targeting structural savings by streamlining our portfolio to better target customer needs. We are increasing leverage in our product and engineering operations by standardizing on fewer platforms to reduce component complexity. We expect these initiatives to reduce duplication and improve our agility and response time to shifting market needs. We also took actions to optimize costs in our corporate business where we drove significant savings. We continue to optimize and reduce structural costs across our core businesses, particularly in office print and in our supplies supply chain, including headcount reductions. In addition, we continue to see benefits from our investments to transform our customer support and services organization enhancing our capabilities to provide a more digital-enabled customer-centric support experience. We continue digitizing our customer support engagement assets using AI-based interactive voice response technology. We expect this initiative will help automate our processes to deliver a more seamless and connected support experience. Lastly, in January, as part of our future-ready target to reduce employee head count by 4,000 to 6,000, we announced a voluntary early retirement program in the United States. The offer provided eligible employees the opportunity to retire from HP with enhanced benefits. More than 900 participants have opted into the plan, with the majority expected to exit during Q2. I continue to be confident in our ability to drive operating cost reductions consistent with our future-ready goals, enabling investments in our key growth areas. Now let me move to cash flow and capital allocation. Q1 cash flow from operations was nominally negative, and free cash flow was an outflow of $0.2 billion, in line with our expectations. Our results were impacted by normal seasonality associated with the timing of variable comp payments as well as restructuring charges and lower volumes in Personal Systems. Additionally, our free cash flow was favorably impacted by the timing of receipts and payments related to our factoring program. This is expected to be net neutral to our full-year free cash flow. The cash conversion cycle was minus 22 days in the quarter. This increased 7 days sequentially, primarily due to an increase in strategic buys driving up DOI and an unfavorable business mix impacting both DOI and DPO. While we decreased our inventory by $0.3 billion sequentially in Q1, we have more work to better align our inventory to our business volumes through operational excellence. We will, however, continue to take advantage of economic opportunities like strategic buys, or more seed transit, both of which would result in carrying more inventory. In Q1, we returned approximately $360 million to shareholders, including $100 million in share repurchases and $259 million in cash dividends. We finished the quarter towards the high end of our target leverage range. Consistent with our disciplined financial management and our strategy to prudently manage our leverage profile and maintain our credit rating in the current challenging environment, we limited our Q1 share repurchases to an amount needed to offset share dilution. Looking forward to Q2 and the rest of FY '23, we expect the macro and demand environment will remain challenged and that our customer end markets will remain competitive. We remain focused on what we can control as we navigate these difficult market conditions. We will continue to rigorously manage costs, streamline operations, and improve our performance as the year progresses while continuing to invest in our growth businesses. In particular, keep the following in mind related to our Q2 and overall financial outlook. Given the challenging macro environment, we are modeling multiple scenarios based on several assumptions. For FY '23, we continue to see a wide range of potential outcomes, which are reflected in our outlook ranges I will discuss shortly. Consistent with the view we shared in November, we are not expecting a significant economic recovery during fiscal 2023. We will continue to focus on driving structural cost savings and efficiencies in our business consistent with the progress we made in Q1 regarding our future-ready transformation strategy. We expect these cost savings will scale into the back half of the year. Given recent weakness in the U.S. dollar, we now expect currency to be about a 3 percentage year-over-year headwind for FY '23. Regarding OI&E expense, we now expect it will be approximately $0.7 billion for FY '23 based on Q1 as a run rate for the year. We continue to expect free cash flow to be in the range of $3 billion to $3.5 billion for FY '23, with the second half of FY '23 stronger than the first. As a reminder, our FY '23 free cash flow outlook includes approximately $400 million of restructuring cash outflows. Turning to Personal Systems. We now expect the overall PC market unit TAM to decline by a high teens percent in FY '23. Specifically, for Q2, we expect Personal Systems revenue will remain under pressure near term and decline sequentially by a high single digit. We expect revenue to improve over the course of the back half of the year as elevated channel inventory levels are expected to normalize by early fiscal Q3. We expect to continue to drive improved mix shifts toward high value, more profitable units and services and expect this will help partially offset the headwinds we've discussed today. We expect Personal Systems margins to be in the lower half of our 5% to 7% long-term range in Q2 as commodities and logistics costs improve in the quarter. But given elevated industry and HP channel inventory levels, pricing continues to be very competitive. For FY '23, we expect margins to be solidly in our target range driven by the gradual improvement in PC revenue in the back half of the year and increasing future-ready transformation savings. In Print, we expect consumer demand softness will persist and macro uncertainty and corporate budgeting tightening will remain headwinds for commercial. Disciplined cost management and further normalization and mix as office gradually improves should help to partially offset these trends. With regard to print supply chain, similar to what we saw in Q1, we expect component shortages will continue to improve but persist into at least Q2, particularly for office hardware, providing continued support for favorable pricing. Regarding supplies, we expect Q2 revenue in constant currency to decline by a high single digit versus our previous expectation to be down closer to double digits. Given its variability, we do not believe inter-quarter growth is indicative of our long-term supplies growth. We continue to expect revenue to decline in FY '23 by low to mid-single digits in constant currency. We now expect print margins to be above the high end of our 16% to 18% range for Q2, driven by continued hardware constraints. We expect FY '23 margins also will be above the high end of our range, driven by disciplined pricing, continued progress on rebalancing our system profitability, and rigorous cost management, including future-ready transformation savings. Taking these considerations into account, we are providing the following outlook for Q2 and fiscal year 2023. We expect second quarter non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $0.73 to $0.83 and second quarter GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $0.40 to $0.50. We expect FY '23 non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $3.20 to $3.60 and FY '23 GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $2.22 to $2.62. We continue to make meaningful progress against both our short- and long-term strategic priorities in a demanding environment. I am confident we are taking the right actions and making the right decisions to create long-term value for our shareholders. I'll stop here so we could open the line for your questions.

Operator

Our first question comes from Shannon Cross with Credit Suisse.

Speaker 4

Can you talk a bit about what's going on in terms of PCs with regard to end demand? And I think you're not alone in saying that the second half of '23 should be better because inventory levels will normalize. But I'm wondering where you're seeing pockets of strength, what you're hearing, how you're thinking about discounting or what features are kind of going to drive an improvement as we get to the second half? And then I have a follow-up.

Sure. Thank you, Shannon. Let me take the question. So first of all, something that has not changed this quarter is the weakness that we have seen in the consumer space that we started to talk about a couple of quarters ago. Something new, though, has been, as we shared in the script, that we have seen weakening demand on the corporate enterprise space as we have seen especially large companies becoming more conscious about how they use their budget, being slowly hiring people, and this has had an impact on the PC side. On the positive side, we have seen reductions of inventory, especially that one that addresses the consumer and SMB business, the more transactional side of the business, which reflects that end-user demand has been stronger than shipments. Our current view is that we will be getting to a normalized channel inventory situation by the end of Q2, early Q3, which means that in the second half, we will not have this headwind. This is one of the reasons why we are optimistic about the evolution of the PC business during the year. We think that demand will evolve similar to previous seasonality before COVID, and this is one of the reasons why we expect our second half to be stronger than the first half.

Speaker 4

Okay. And then, Marie, can you talk about working capital and how we should think about it as we go through the year? I understand factoring helped receivables this quarter. I don't know if that's sort of an immediate bounce back or a reversal. And then just in general, maybe where you think we can end the year in terms of inventory in that given some of the prebuys versus ability to work through what you have?

Shannon, so maybe it's a good time for me just to start out first with how I think about inventory and DOI sort of going forward. I mean, look, candidly, we need to be good at doing both operationally and excellent actually and driving value where we see opportunities. So as you've seen, we've been very focused on driving up our inventory turns. And when we see economic value, we will pursue strategic buys, right, and look for lower-cost modes of transport. But let me sort of hit up specifically your question around Q1. What we saw is that inventory turns declined but not necessarily in line with all our business volumes, and that was really largely a result, Shannon, of the strategic buys that we did in the quarter. So we want to remain open to evaluate those economic opportunities, both for strategic buys and frankly, for lower-cost modes of transport throughout the year.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Erik Woodring with Morgan Stanley.

Speaker 5

Marie, maybe this one is for you. You obviously just guided the PC market a little weaker than you communicated three months ago. I think of that as a headwind to cash just given the strong negative cash conversion cycle. At the same time, as you just alluded to, your inventory is still at relatively elevated levels, and Q1 free cash flow was negative with a tailwind from factoring. And so I guess my question is really just what gives you confidence in maintaining the full-year free cash flow guide? What is it you see in the data? What are some of the specific factors that you think ultimately get you back or get you into that range for the full year? And then I have a follow-up.

So in terms of how we look at cash for the year, I'd say first out, our free cash flow for Q1 was absolutely in line with what we expected. Plus, if you look at the earnings outlook that I gave in the guide for the rest of the year. It's absolutely in line with what we guided last quarter. So really, it is the combination of both that give me confidence in our guide of $3 billion to $3.5 billion for the year. A couple of other points of note to pivot off what Enrique said early about seasonality. Now we do expect cash flow to sort of line up with the seasonality comments that Enrique made earlier. So we expect it to be better and materially stronger in the second half of the year. With that said, we do expect cash flow in Q2, therefore, to be roughly in line with Q1. Just remember, in the second half of the year, PS revenue will grow on the top line. And as you know, that PS contributes cash when it grows sequentially because of its negative cash conversion cycle. Another source of cash just to hit on it. I know Shannon brought up that point a moment ago, another source is obviously continued inventory reductions. And actually, this quarter, we did reduce inventory. So both of those, I think, are just really good examples of how we think about cash flow for the year.

Speaker 5

Okay. That's really helpful. And then maybe my second question is just on print operating margins. Another really strong quarter. That's five consecutive quarters above your 16% to 18% target range. Do you expect to be above that range for the full year? So are we entering a new paradigm maybe where print operating margins are going to be above that long-term range? Or are there other factors that you expected to become offset such that longer term, we should think about print operating margins more within that 16% range?

Yes. Erik, I'll address that question. As we have indicated, we do anticipate print margins to exceed the upper end of our projected range for at least 2023. The performance in Q1 illustrates this, as print margins are significantly influenced by our effective strategy. This is evident in several aspects, such as improving profitability between hardware and supplies and transitioning more of our business to HP+ and big tank models. In fact, over 50%—56%—of units shipped last quarter were in that HP+ and big tank category. Additionally, our execution has been strong. The actions we took last quarter showcase effective cost management and future-ready initiatives, along with resilient pricing, all contributing to the strong margins. What we observed in Q1 is what we expect for the remainder of the year in print.

Let me add that we are pleased both with the strategic progress we have made at executing the strategies that we defined three years ago but also taking advantage and getting the benefit from all the work on cost that we did during the last three years and that we are continuing to do now.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Ananda Baruah with Loop Capital.

Speaker 6

Really appreciate it. I may have missed it, Enrique and Marie, but did you mention of the growth business category what percentage of revenue those are now? And what's the growth profile was for the quarter? And then I have a follow-up as well.

Thank you for the question, as this is something we wanted to clarify. We briefly mentioned it in the script but want to provide more details. During this quarter, we made changes to the definition of our growth categories to better align our external communication with some internal changes. The growth categories refer to the six businesses we believe will grow faster than our core business and will have better margins than the core. They share a strategic intent to create more value for our customers by focusing on long-term relationships with them. This drives our expansion into services, subscriptions, and other businesses. Last quarter, we made two internal changes: first, we established a focused organization to advance Workforce Solutions and Services, with the goal of enhancing service-driven opportunities. Second, we formed a consumer subscriptions team to expand this opportunity across the company, beginning with our work on Instant Ink and eventually covering the entire HP portfolio. We also decided to align the HyperX business with our gaming PC team, creating a single group responsible for the complete gaming experience. As we implemented these changes, we also realigned how we report them externally, especially in the Workforce Solutions and Services area, as we focus on service-enabled businesses.

Speaker 6

And Enrique, I'll keep it here. Are you saying that you will no longer provide us with information about the previous grouping, such as the percentage of revenue and the growth rates of that grouping? I also have a quick clarification after that.

No, we will continue to do that. I was just highlighting the changes because, for example, as we have done that, the overall size of Workforce Solutions is going to be smaller than what it was because we have redesigned, redefined the business. This is what I was highlighting. Every quarter, we will provide visibility as we have done over the last quarter of the growth of the different businesses, you see that on the deck. And every year, we will be reporting the total size as we have done in the past, Ananda.

And they did grow double digits collectively in the quarter as well and other just to answer part of your question.

Speaker 6

And then my quick follow-up is, Enrique, you mentioned in the prepared remarks and you just mentioned a moment ago, shifting the HP portfolio towards subscription. Is that to say the entirety of the HP portfolio, you guys have an eye on moving towards the subscription model? I just want to make sure I understand the context of those remarks.

So this is something that we shared already in our Investor Day a couple of years ago, so it's not new. But we see an opportunity to better serve our customers by expanding our subscription business from supplies to eventually other parts of the portfolio. Our long-term direction is to enable a large part of the HP portfolio, but this is a journey that is going to take multiple quarters. You will see us making progress in the next quarters. We are now including paper. We will be including some of our PCs and printers in the coming quarters. And over time, we will continue to expand the offering.

Operator

We'll take our next question from David Vogt with UBS.

Speaker 7

Maybe just a question for both Enrique and Marie. When I think about your comments about how the TAM develops in fiscal '23, if I extrapolate what you've done in the past pre-COVID it would suggest that by, let's say, by fiscal Q4, your PC segment could be basically flat on a year-over-year basis. Is that the right way to think about the business as it sort of plays out over the next couple of quarters? And then I have a follow-up.

Yes. Maybe I can sort of talk to just the PC outlook and how to think about the guide. So obviously, a big part of this is, I think what Enrique said earlier around the channel inventory. We do expect that, that channel inventory will get cleaned up through the course of Q2 and then into Q3. And I think Enrique mentioned that some of that pressure that we're seeing in the corporate enterprise space. And I think this is largely in line with what the industry is assuming. So at this point, if you look at the midpoint of our guide, we're not expecting any type of macro recovery. But if you sort of group all this together, what we're expecting is we're going to see better PS revenue in the back half as that channel sort of corrects and cleans up.

Speaker 7

Okay. As a follow-up, considering the profitability of PC for the entire year and your comments about revenue in the second half, it suggests that in the latter half of the year, the quarterly profitability per share will need to exceed $0.90. This puts you roughly flat with last year. Do you anticipate this kind of leverage as the cost reductions begin to take effect more significantly in the July and October quarters compared to where we are in the April quarter?

Yes. So that ties very much to the comments I made earlier around the channel but also just combined with the fact that we do expect, I think I said in my prepared remarks, to see ourselves in the lower half of the range in Q2 as we go through that channel correction. Then as we get into the back half, we're going to see the margin rates lift back up to be fully in the range. And so it's a combination of the channel plus we've got the impact of our future-ready efforts. We've already seen some of that impact play out here in Q1. We expect those actions to continue to take a stronger hold throughout the year. So expect to see some of that in the rates as well. And then I would add another factor which did help and contribute actually to the margin in Q1, and that was the mix inside the PS business. So remember, we have now a full quarter of Poly in our numbers and that overall mix shift is also a driver and contributing to the overall margin structure as well.

Yes. Maybe let me add a comment on TAM that I think will help to understand these numbers from Marie. As you were saying from a unit perspective, we expect the TAM of the year to be flattish compared to what it was in 2019, but we expect it to be higher from a revenue perspective because of the change of mix that Marie was explaining. So from a revenue perspective, this has an impact on total TAM, and it will also have an impact on our performance.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Toni Sacconaghi with Bernstein.

Speaker 8

Yes. Thank you. I have two as well. Perhaps you can just give us an update on how much progress and savings were realized in Q1, and specifically, it looks like SG&A went up considerably sequentially, even though revenues were down. And I thought you had two months of Poly last quarter, so there's some incremental Poly, but maybe you can just reconcile what happened with SG&A on a sequential basis? And then how much of the progress towards 40% of the savings do you feel you captured in Q1? And I have a follow-up, please.

It's Marie. So maybe I will just hit up quickly SG&A, what drove that increase sequentially? So primarily, Toni, that was due to the increase in incentive comp and stock comp. So you might recall that Q1 is a normal quarter for our annual equity grants for employees. So that's what you've seen there relative to what drove that increase. And then with respect to the transformation savings, I would say that we're off to a very strong start. And in fact, these savings contributed to the overall results in the quarter. And you saw that obviously in the evidence and the strength of the margins in both PS and print. And I'd say, look, we are absolutely confident we're on track for the plan for the year. And we're continuing to work that funnel, put more into the funnel. So at this point in time, I'd say we're absolutely committed to delivering at least that $560 million of gross structural run rate savings by the end of this fiscal year.

We have initiatives underway in all the areas we outlined last quarter, focusing on portfolio simplification by removing certain elements and streamlining processes through digital tools. We are seeking efficiencies across the board, and I believe we have a comprehensive program throughout the company driving these efforts. We are making significant progress.

Speaker 8

If I could follow up on cash flow, the midpoint of your guidance suggests about $3.3 billion in net income. After accounting for $400 million in restructuring costs, that brings it down to $2.9 billion. Additionally, there is a negative mix shift as PCs are likely growing slower than the overall company. Considering these factors, it appears you're looking at figures below $3 billion. What steps will you take to bridge that gap to exceed $3 billion? Are you expecting significant improvements in working capital? You mentioned potential strategic adjustments, which could affect inventory levels. Based on this information, could you clarify what else is needed to achieve comfort with targets between $3 billion and $3.5 billion?

Sure, Toni. I want to emphasize that we remain committed to the Q1 numbers and the earnings guidance provided last quarter. Additionally, regarding working capital, we successfully reduced our owned inventory by approximately $300 million during the quarter. We plan to continue reducing our owned inventory throughout the year while remaining open to any economic opportunities for strategic purchases. Another key point is the anticipated improvement in Personal Systems revenue in the second half of the year. Personal Systems generates cash when it grows sequentially due to its negative cash conversion cycle. These points should help you model the cash flow for the year.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Sidney Ho with Deutsche Bank.

Speaker 9

My first question is on the print side. It does look like the supply is a little better than you expected and you also slightly upticked the guidance for Q2. Just curious about the dynamics that you're seeing there? And do you think the overall business for Print has reached a bottom in Q1, considering supplies are starting to improve and commercial constraints are starting to ease as well. And then I have a follow-up.

Yes, I can address your question regarding supplies. You're correct that we observed better performance in Q1, and our guidance indicates that we anticipate a decline of only high single digits in Q2. Looking ahead for the year, we expect supplies revenue growth to align with what we shared during our Analyst Day, aiming for low to mid-single digits. Key factors contributing to this include strong consumer usage and favorable share trends, as well as the pricing resilience we are witnessing in print, particularly within supplies. Additionally, in response to the inquiries about channel imagery, our entire multitiered ecosystem shows that supplies channel inventory is in excellent condition.

And let me add one comment. And we have said that when results were below the expectations we had. And I will say now, it also when we are above, looking at quarter-on-quarter comparison one year, is really not the best way to look at the health of the business. This is why Marie was saying we continue to maintain the guide that we had for the year for supplies. Year-on-year comparisons are much better. Small changes one quarter could have a big impact on the quarter-on-quarter comparison, so easily not the right way to look at the health of the business.

Speaker 9

Great. That's helpful. A quick follow-up here is that if I look at the full year EPS guide being unchanged, obviously, but there are a lot of different moving parts. Partly, on the goods on the positive side, you've got foreign exchange being better, margins seem to be better. It sounds like on the negative side, there's some PC demand weaker than you expected. Just maybe if you can help us bridge the various components that get you back to the original guidance, that would be helpful.

Yes. Look, maybe I'll start out and say, look, the outlook, as you know, we've got a pretty broad range there. So it does contemplate multiple scenarios. And obviously, it's prudent, and as always, I think you see that from us. If we can do better, we absolutely will. So - but a couple of drivers there. I'll just walk you through to kind of get you through the puts and takes on the guide. First and foremost, we've talked a bit about our cost actions today for future-ready. We do expect that they're going to continue to yield quite positive results in the back half of the year. And as I said earlier with Toni, we're working that funnel to pull even more savings into FY '23. So that will be a contributor. We've talked about channel contribution in terms of Personal Systems. Plus, we did get a chance to hit on today, just the continued improvement in the supply chain. I think that's a very important point we didn't get much time to talk about. And then finally, just remember, at the midpoint, we don't expect a macro, but we're working multiple scenarios. So that's why we've got the range that we have on the guide this time.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Amit Daryanani with Evercore.

Speaker 10

This is Lauren on for Amit. I just wanted to double-click into your views on the PC TAM beyond 2023. What kind of gives you the confidence in a structurally larger PC TAM versus some of the comments that IDC has made and some of the revisions they've made to their long-term forecast?

I believe there are two major positive trends worth mentioning. Currently, the installed base is much higher than it used to be, which means that eventually, these PCs will need to be upgraded. This creates a favorable environment for our business. Additionally, from a revenue standpoint, as I mentioned earlier, the current usage of PCs and the applications being utilized require better specifications. Combining these factors presents us with an opportunity for growth. Furthermore, we recognize the potential around PCs, such as in the hybrid video conferencing sector, and we believe that hybrid work is a lasting trend. This represents an additional opportunity compared to what we saw in 2019. Lastly, the shift towards services, including contractual services for businesses and subscriptions for consumers, also provides us with avenues to expand our business and increase the total addressable market.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Jim Suva with Citigroup.

Speaker 11

Congratulations on the impressive results and outlook, especially given the macro conditions. I have a question for Enrique. My family and I are subscribers to Instant Ink, and we really enjoy it. You mentioned a shift to subscriptions. Does this apply to all your product options, or do you see a future where sales will predominantly be subscription-based? I'm curious if you think both models can coexist, but you suggested that subscriptions will be used across everything. How far do you envision this approach going for every single transaction? Or will it depend more on your customers' preferences?

It will be more options depending on the clientele. We know that there are customers that will be willing to buy subscriptions and others that prefer not to. And of course, we will be offering both. But since you are a customer already of Instant Ink, let me do a small commercial: you should enroll now to the paper program because now you can get not only ink, but you can get paper, which is an addition to the program. Over time, you will be able to buy the next printer and other types of services from us. So this is part of the road map that we have of expanding the portfolio of subscriptions that we shared in the past and that now is starting to become real.

Yes, no worries. I’d say nothing's changed. We continue to make the same capital allocation approach that we've used for the last sort of three years or so. But I would say one point, which I think you hit on there, is that we are very focused on keeping our gross leverage under 2. And you would have seen in the quarter that we actually bought back only $100 million shares. So consistent with maintaining our leverage ratio, we don't anticipate buying back shares in Q2, but we do expect that we'll have room for share repurchases in the back half of the year. So I'd just like to close and say, look, we're committed to staying within our target leverage range. For us, maintaining a strong balance sheet and an investment-grade credit rating is just critical to our business, Jim. I don't know, Enrique, if you have anything you want to add.

Yes, I would like to add, as our leverage ratio will allow us, we continue to believe that buying back shares is a great way to return value to our shareholders, and this is something that we plan to continue to do as we have done in the last years. And I think with that, this was the last question. Thank you, everybody, for joining. Thank you for spending time with us today. And maybe let me confirm some of the key messages that we have driven today. First of all, that even in a challenging environment, we have delivered on the commitments that we made a quarter ago based on the progress we have made in the areas that we can control whether it's costs, price, mix, growing share in profitable categories. We know that this is how we can manage where we need to focus and what we have been doing during the last quarter. And at the same time, we have maintained investment in the growth areas because we think our goal continues to be to position HP in a strong way for whenever the economic recovery will happen. Thank you again for joining us today and looking forward to talking again in a quarter. Thank you.

Operator

And that does conclude today's presentation. Thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect.