MBAI 20-F
Check-Cap Ltd (MBAI)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
OR
For the fiscal year ended
OR
OR
Commission file number
(Exact name of the Registrant as specified in its charter)
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(Address of principal executive offices)
Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer
Check-Cap Ltd.
1271
Telephone:
Email:
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of
each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: As of December 31,
2025, the registrant had
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☐
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company.
| ☐ Large Accelerated filer | ☐ Accelerated filer | ☒ |
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or
issued its audit report.
If securities are registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction
of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
| ☒ | ☐ International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board | ☐ Other |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of the securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes ☐ No ☐
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | ||
| Part I | 1 | |
| Item 1. | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers | 1 |
| A. | Directors and Senior Management | 1 |
| B. | Advisers | 1 |
| C. | Auditors | 1 |
| Item 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable | 1 |
| Item 3. | Key Information | 1 |
| A. | [Reserved.] | 1 |
| B. | Capitalization and Indebtedness | 1 |
| C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds | 1 |
| D. | Risk factors | 1 |
| Item 4. | Information On Our Company | 44 |
| A. | History and Development of the Company Our History | 44 |
| B. | Business | 45 |
| C. | Organizational Structure | 75 |
| D. | Property, Plants and Equipment | 75 |
| Item 4A. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 75 |
| Item 5. | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects | 76 |
| A. | Operating Results | 77 |
| B. | Liquidity and Capital Resources | 82 |
| C. | Research and development, patents and licenses, etc. | 85 |
| D. | Trend Information | 85 |
| E. | Critical Accounting Estimates | 86 |
i
ii
| Part II | 126 | |
| Item 13. | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies | 126 |
| Item 14. | Material Modifications to The Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds | 126 |
| Item 15. | Controls and Procedures | 126 |
| Item 16. | [Reserved] | 126 |
| Item 16A. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. | 126 |
| Item 16B. | Code of Ethics. | 127 |
| Item 16C. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. | 127 |
| Item 16D. | Exemptions From The Listing Standards for Audit Committees. | 128 |
| Item 16E. | Purchases of Equity Securities By The Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers. | 128 |
| Item 16F. | Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant. | 128 |
| Item 16G. | Corporate Governance. | 130 |
| Item 16H. | Mine Safety Disclosure. | 131 |
| Item 16I. | Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections. | 131 |
| Item 16J. | Insider Trading Policies. | 131 |
| Item 16K. | Cybersecurity. | 131 |
| Part III | 133 | |
| Item 17. | Financial Statements | 133 |
| Item 18. | Financial Statements | 133 |
| Item 19. | Exhibits | 133 |
| Signatures | 136 | |
iii
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Check-Cap Ltd. (“Check-Cap”, the “Company” or “we”) is a clinical stage medical diagnostics company with a limited operating history. On June 6, 2023, Check-Cap announced that after further review of additional data and interaction with the Food and Drug Administration on a revised pivotal study protocol together with the anticipated time and investment necessary to further develop the technology, it was reducing its workforce significantly to reduce cash burn, concentrating its resources on essential research activities, discontinuing its calibration studies, and evaluating and pursuing strategic options. As a result of its evaluation and pursuit of strategic options, on August 16, 2023, Check-Cap entered into a business combination agreement (the “Keystone BCA”) with Keystone Dental Holdings, Inc. (“Keystone”), Capstone Dental PubCo, Inc (“PubCo”) and other direct, wholly owned subsidiaries of PubCo. At its 2023 annual general meeting of shareholders, such business combination transactions did not receive the requisite majority required for approval under Section 320 of the Israeli Companies Law 5759-1999. On December 24, 2023, Check-Cap received a notice on behalf of Keystone, terminating the Keystone BCA in light of the results. On March 25, 2024, Check-Cap entered into a business combination agreement (the “Apollo BCA”) with Apollo Technology Capital Corporation (formerly known as Nobul AI Corp.) (“Apollo”), a private Ontario corporation (the “Check-Cap/Apollo Business Combination”). On September 12, 2025, Check-Cap entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with MBody AI Inc. (“MBody AI”), a Nevada corporation, and CC Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Check-Cap (the “Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into MBody AI, with MBody AI surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Check-Cap (the “Merger”). The Merger and a proposed reverse share split of Check-Cap’s ordinary shares within a range of 1 for 2 to 1 for 100 were approved by Check-Cap’s shareholders on November 14, 2025. The exact ratio of the reverse share split will be determined by further action of Check-Cap’s board of directors and will be effective on a date to be determined by Check-Cap’s board of directors. The Merger is expected to consummate in the first half of 2026; however, the timing of the completion of the Merger is subject to various conditions and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that the Merger will be completed within this timeframe or at all. Immediately after the Merger, former MBody AI equityholders are expected to own approximately 90% of the issued and outstanding ordinary shares of the combined company on a fully diluted basis, and former Check-Cap equityholders are expected to own approximately 10% of the issued and outstanding ordinary shares of the combined company on a fully diluted basis. The combined company will change its name from “Check-Cap Ltd.” to “MBody AI Ltd.” On December 1, 2025, Check-Cap changed its ticker symbol from “CHEK” to “MBAI” effective at the opening of trading on December 2, 2025.
At the effective time of the closing of the Merger, the Apollo BCA will be terminated by mutual consent of the parties such that no termination fee will be due to Apollo or Check-Cap. Upon the closing of the Merger, the loans made by Check-Cap to Apollo that are currently outstanding will be converted into a 7.5% equity position in Apollo that will be owned by Check-Cap, and each of the related loan agreements between Check-Cap and Apollo will be cancelled for no further consideration.
iv
CERTAIN INFORMATION
Unless otherwise stated, all of our financial information presented in this annual report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP.
In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, or the Annual Report, unless the context indicates otherwise, references to “NIS” are to the legal currency of Israel, “U.S. dollars,” “$” or “dollars” are to United States dollars, and the terms “we,” “us,” “our Company,” “our,” and “Check-Cap” refer to Check-Cap Ltd. Unless otherwise indicated, U.S. dollar translation of NIS amounts presented in this Annual Report are translated using the rate of $1.00 = NIS 3.1870, the exchange rate published by the U.S. Treasury’s official report on December 31, 2025, and U.S. dollar translation of GBP amounts presented in this Annual Report are translated using the rate of $1.00 = GBP 0.7912, based on the exchange rates published by the U.S. Treasury’s official report on December 31, 2025.
USE OF TRADE NAMES AND TRADEMARKS
Throughout this Annual Report, we refer to various trademarks, service marks and trade names that we use in our business. The “CHECK-CAP” and “C-Scan” trademarks and design logos are the property of Check-Cap Ltd. Other trademarks and service marks appearing in this Annual Report are the property of their respective holders. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ tradenames, trademarks or service marks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by these other companies. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Annual Report appear without the ® or TM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names.
v
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements about our expectations, beliefs or intentions regarding, among other things, our plans with respect to our evaluation and pursuit of strategic options including the transactions contemplated by the Apollo BCA and the Merger Agreement, our ongoing and planned product development and clinical trials and lack thereof; the timing of, and our ability to make, regulatory filings and obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for our product candidates; our intellectual property position; the degree of clinical utility of our products, particularly in specific patient populations; our ability to develop commercial functions; expectations regarding product launch and revenue; our results of operations; cash needs; our ability to raise capital, including but not limited to capital raised pursuant to our existing equity line of credit; financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth and strategies; the industry in which we operate; and the trends that may affect the industry or us. In addition, from time to time, we or our representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements, orally or in writing. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “should” or “anticipate” or their negatives or other variations of these words or other comparable words or by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. These forward-looking statements may be included in, but are not limited to, various filings made by us with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, press releases or oral statements made by or with the approval of one of our authorized executive officers. Forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results as of the date they are made. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the factors summarized below.
This Annual Report identifies important factors which could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements, particularly those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors.” The risk factors included in this Annual Report are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| ● | our previously announced Merger Agreement with MBody AI and the proposed termination of the Apollo BCA upon the closing of the Merger, and our ability to consummate the Merger; |
| ● | our ability to successfully integrate MBody AI’s business and operations following the closing of the Merger; |
| ● | our ability to capitalize on the Ghost Kitchen franchise rights; |
| ● | our ability to raise capital, including pursuant to our existing equity line of credit; |
| ● | our ability to maintain compliance with The Nasdaq Capital Market LLC’s (“Nasdaq”) continued listing requirements; |
| ● | our history of losses; |
| ● | our needs for additional capital to fund our operations and our inability to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all; |
| ● | our ability to continue as a going concern; |
| ● | the initiation, timing, progress and results of our clinical trials and other product development efforts; |
vi
| ● | our reliance on one product; |
| ● | the clinical development, commercialization and market acceptance of C-Scan; |
| ● | our ability to receive de novo classification or premarket approval and other regulatory approvals for C-Scan; |
| ● | our ability to successfully complete clinical trials and obtain desired performance. |
| ● | our reliance on single-source suppliers; |
| ● | our ability to achieve an acceptable cost of goods; |
| ● | our reliance on third parties, such as for purposes of our clinical trials and clinical development and the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of C-Scan; |
| ● | our ability to establish and maintain strategic partnerships and other corporate collaborations; |
| ● | our ability to achieve reimbursement and coverage from government and private third-party payors; |
| ● | the implementation of our business model and strategic plans for our business; |
| ● | the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering C-Scan and our ability to operate our business without infringing the intellectual property rights of others; |
| ● | competitive companies, technologies and our industry; |
| ● | current or future adverse developments with respect to financial institutions and associated liquidity risk; |
| ● | unfavorable economic and market conditions, including uncertainties around the impact of inflation, cost of capital and the impact from the changes in economic policies and regulations, such as trade policies and tariffs; and |
| ● | those factors referred to in “Item 3. Key Information - D. Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company,” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, as well as in this Annual Report generally. |
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf speak only as of the date of this Annual Report and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Annual Report. We undertake no obligations to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In evaluating forward-looking statements, you should consider these risks and uncertainties.
vii
MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA
Market data and certain industry data and forecasts used throughout this Annual Report were obtained from internal company surveys, market research, consultant surveys commissioned by the Company, publicly available information, reports of governmental agencies and industry publications and surveys. Industry surveys, publications, consultant surveys commissioned by the Company and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, this information may prove to be inaccurate because of the method by which some of the data for the estimates is obtained or because this information cannot always be verified with complete certainty due to the limits on the availability and reliability of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other limitations and uncertainties. As a result, the market and industry data and forecasts included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report, and estimates and beliefs based on that data, may not be reliable. We have relied on certain data from third-party sources, including internal surveys, industry forecasts and market research, which we believe to be reliable based on our management’s knowledge of the industry. However, we have not ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein. Forecasts are particularly likely to be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time. In addition, we do not necessarily know what assumptions regarding general economic growth were used in preparing the forecasts we cite. Statements as to our market position are based to the best of our knowledge on the most currently available data. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding the industry data presented in this Annual Report, our estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.
viii
Part I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
A. Directors and Senior Management
Not required.
B. Advisers
Not required.
C. Auditors
Not required.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not required.
Item 3. Key Information
A. [Reserved]
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not required.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not required.
D. Risk factors
In conducting our business, we face many risks that may interfere with our business objectives. Some of these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, we are subject to various risks resulting from changing economic, political, industry, regulatory, business and financial conditions. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business operations.
You should carefully consider the following factors and other information in this Annual Report before you decide to invest in our ordinary shares. These disclosures reflect our beliefs and opinions as to factors that could materially and adversely affect us and our securities in the future. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not such factors have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future. If any of the risks referred to below occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. In any such case, the trading price of our ordinary shares could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
1
Summary Risk Factors
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section titled “Risk Factors” immediately following this summary. The principal factors and uncertainties that make investing in our ordinary shares risky, include, among others:
Risks Related to the Merger
| ● | The issuance of ordinary shares in connection with the Merger will substantially dilute the relative voting power of holders of Check-Cap ordinary shares prior to the closing of the Merger, and, as a result, such holders will exercise substantially less influence over the management and policies of the combined company following the consummation of the Merger; |
| ● | The Company has incurred and expects to continue to incur substantial non-recurring transaction-related costs in connection with the Merger, including legal, accounting, regulatory filing, and other professional fees, which will be incurred regardless of whether the Merger is completed; |
| ● | The Company may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger, including as a result of difficulties in integrating the operations and personnel of the two companies, failure to retain key employees, higher-than-expected integration or transaction costs, and unforeseen market or economic conditions; |
| ● | The Company may become involved in securities class action litigation or shareholder derivative litigation in connection with the Merger, which could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources, and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations; |
| ● | If the Merger is not completed for any reason, the Company will need to evaluate its strategic alternatives and will require significant additional funding in order to continue operations, and if such funding is not available on acceptable terms, the Company may be forced to significantly curtail or cease operations; and |
| ● | The Apollo BCA remains in effect and will not terminate unless and until the Merger closes, and the Company has outstanding other payables due to Apollo in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $1.4 million as of December 31, 2025, the conversion of which to equity in Apollo is contingent on the closing of the Merger. |
Risks Related to Our Financial Position
| ● | We have a history of losses, may incur future losses and require additional funding in order to complete the development of our products and technology. If additional capital is not available and we cease the development of our products and technology or are obligated to relinquish rights to our intellectual property, we may not ever achieve profitability and be forced to liquidate; and |
| ● | We may not recover amounts loaned to Apollo, and any equity interest in Apollo we ultimately hold may be illiquid and of uncertain value. The Company has made loans to Apollo in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $16.3 million, which are to be exchanged for common shares representing a 7.5% equity interest in Apollo, pursuant to an Exchange Agreement (defined below) and a BCA Termination Agreement dated September 12, 2025, by and between Apollo and the Company (the “BCA Termination Agreement”), conditioned on the closing of the Merger. If the Merger does not close, the Exchange Agreement will not close and the Company may not recover these amounts. If the Merger closes, the Company will hold a minority interest in a private company with no readily determinable fair value, and there can be no assurance the Company will realize the carrying value, or any value, from such investment. |
Risks Related to MBody AI’s Business and Operations
| ● | MBody AI has a limited operating history and an evolving business model, which makes it difficult to evaluate its future prospects and may adversely affect the MBody AI’s ability to achieve its business objectives; |
| ● | MBody AI currently relies on a limited number of customers, and the loss or reduction of business from any customer could materially adversely affect its results of operations; |
2
| ● | MBody AI’s operations depend on a small number of third-party vendors, deployment partners, and hardware suppliers, and any failure by its suppliers to deliver on schedule, in sufficient quantities, or at anticipated price points could delay customer implementations or impair revenue targets; |
| ● | MBody AI operates in regulated environments, including hospitality, gaming, and potentially healthcare, and regulatory requirements may change over time, differ by jurisdiction, or impose additional compliance costs that could adversely affect its ability to deploy its platform or expand into new markets; |
| ● | MBody AI may face liability or compliance exposure related to the operation of autonomous systems, and the evolving regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence, robotics, and autonomous systems could impose additional obligations or restrict certain applications; |
| ● | MBody AI has a history of operating losses since inception and may not achieve or sustain profitability, and will require additional capital to execute its business plan, which may not be available on acceptable terms; |
| ● | MBody AI operates in a rapidly evolving and competitive market, and new technologies, business models, or competitors may emerge that could reduce demand for its platform or render its offerings less competitive; and |
| ● | MBody AI’s success depends on its ability to attract and retain key management and technical personnel, and the loss of key personnel or inability to attract additional talent could materially adversely affect its business. |
Risks Related to the ARC ELOC Facility
| ● | It is not possible to predict the actual number of shares we will sell under that certain Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) entered with ARC Group International Ltd. (“ARC”) on December 17, 2025 (the “ARC ELOC Facility”), or the actual gross proceeds resulting from those sales, and the total proceeds could be substantially less than the $30.0 million total commitment amount; |
| ● | We may require additional financing to sustain our operations beyond the Purchase Agreement, and such financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations; |
| ● | Future sales and issuances of our ordinary shares, including pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, might result in significant dilution to existing shareholders and could cause the price of our ordinary shares to decline; and |
| ● | We undertake to seek shareholder approval to re-designate our ordinary shares as no-par value, and any delay or failure to complete the re-designation could limit our flexibility to issue shares under the Purchase Agreement and adversely affect our ability to raise capital. |
Risks Related to the Acquisition of Ghost Kitchen Franchise Rights in New Jersey
| ● | There can be no assurance that the Company will realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Ghost Kitchen franchise rights in New Jersey, including generating revenue from the acquired operations; and |
| ● | The Company issued 1,169,596 ordinary shares as consideration for the acquisition of Ghost Kitchen franchise rights in New Jersey, and while the shares are subject to a two-year lock-up period and a voting agreement, the eventual availability of those shares for resale in the public market could adversely affect the price of our ordinary shares. |
3
Risks Related to Our Historical Business Operations
| ● | Although we received Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval of our investigational device exemption (“IDE”) (including our IDE amended application) for our U.S. pivotal study, the most recent efficacy results from our studies did not meet the goal to proceed to the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study, as such we cannot provide any assurance that we will ever be able to redesign such study or redeploy our technology into other potentially viable products; |
| ● | Clinical failure can occur at any stage of clinical development, and we may not succeed in completing the development of our product. Any product we advance through clinical trials may require further clinical validation and may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval; |
| ● | We may face a number of challenges with respect to our commercialization efforts and may not succeed in the commercialization of our product, obtain required regulatory approvals or manufacture commercial quantities of C-Scan at an acceptable cost to enable us to generate significant revenues; |
| ● | We have limited manufacturing experience and capabilities and if we are unable to scale up our manufacturing operations to develop our products, our growth could be limited and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected; |
| ● | Our reliance on sole or single source suppliers could harm our ability to conduct clinical trials and meet demand for our product in a timely manner or within our budget; |
| ● | The use of any of our C-Scan Cap, C-Scan Track, C-Scan View or any new products and technology could result in product liability or similar claims that could be expensive to defend, damage our reputation and harm our business; |
| ● | We have historically depended on third parties to manage our clinical studies and trials, perform related data collection and analysis, and to enroll patients for our clinical trials, and, as a result, we may face costs and delays that are beyond our control; |
| ● | We currently expect to sell our products mainly in the United States, Europe, Israel and Japan and, if we are unable to manage our operations in these territories, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected; |
| ● | We may not be successful in establishing and maintaining strategic partnerships, which could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our products and technology; |
| ● | A security breach or disruption or failure in a computer or communications systems could adversely affect us; |
| ● | We or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely affected by natural disasters and/or health epidemics or pandemics and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster; and |
| ● | Shareholder activism could result in potential operational disruption, divert our resources and management’s attention and have an adverse effect on our business. |
Risks Related to Regulations Applicable to Our Historical Business
| ● | If we or our future manufacturers or distributors do not obtain and maintain the necessary regulatory clearances or approvals, or equivalent third country approvals in a specific country or region, we or our future distributors will not be able to market and sell C-Scan or future products in that country or region; |
| ● | If the indications for use or instructions for use for which the iodinated oral contrast medium is approved are not sufficiently broad to support its use throughout the C-Scan procedure, the FDA or the competent regulatory authorities in the European Union (“EU”) Member States and other foreign countries may consider that contrast agent is being used off-label; |
4
| ● | The results of any future clinical trials may not support our product candidate requirements or intended use claims or may result in the discovery of adverse side effects; |
| ● | Even if C-Scan or future products are cleared or approved by regulatory authorities or after obtaining CE Certificates from a notified body, modifications to C-Scan or future products may require new regulatory clearances or approvals, new CE Certificates, or may require us to recall or cease marketing it until the necessary clearances, approvals or CE Certificates are obtained; |
| ● | Our failure to comply with radiation safety or radio frequency regulations in a specific country or region could impair our ability to conduct our clinical trials, or commercially distribute and market C-Scan or any similar product in that country or region; |
| ● | Our products may in the future be subject to product recalls that could harm our reputation, business and financial results; |
| ● | If C-Scan or future products cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury, or malfunction in such a way that causes or contributes to a death or serious injury, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in corrective actions or enforcement actions from regulatory authorities; |
| ● | Our business is subject to complex environmental and health legislation in various jurisdictions that may increase our costs and our risk of noncompliance; |
| ● | Federal and state privacy laws, and equivalent laws of third countries, may increase our costs of operation and expose us to civil and criminal sanctions; |
| ● | If we fail to comply with the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state and third-country laws, we could be subject to criminal and civil penalties and exclusion from federally funded healthcare programs including the Medicare and Medicaid programs and equivalent third-country programs, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations; |
| ● | Our failure to comply with the necessary regulatory approval regarding the use of radioactive materials could significantly impair our ability to develop, manufacture and/or sell C-Scan or similar products; and |
| ● | Our ability to source and distribute our products profitably or at all could be harmed if new trade restrictions are imposed or existing trade restrictions become more burdensome. |
Risks Related to Our Legacy Intellectual Property
| ● | If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed; |
| ● | Because the medical device industry is litigious, we are susceptible to intellectual property suits that could cause us to incur substantial costs or pay substantial damages or prohibit us from selling C-Scan or any similar products we may develop; |
| ● | The steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the market; |
| ● | Third parties may challenge the validity of our issued patents or challenge patent applications in administrative proceedings before various patent offices which, if successful, could negatively affect our future business and financial performance; |
5
| ● | We may need to initiate lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, which could be expensive and, if we lose, could cause us to lose some of our intellectual property rights, which would harm our ability to compete in the market; |
| ● | We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors; however, if a third party is entitled to use our trademark, we could be forced to rebrand, which could result in loss of brand recognition and our ability to distinguish our products may be impaired, which could adversely affect our business; and |
| ● | We may not be able to enforce covenants not to compete at all or, we may be unable to enforce them for the duration contemplated in our employment contracts and may, therefore, be unable to prevent competitors from benefiting from the expertise of some of our former employees involved in research and development activities. |
Risks Related to Our Operations in Israel
| ● | Our principal offices, research and development facilities, our manufacturing sites and some of our suppliers are located in Israel and, therefore, our business, financial condition and results of operation may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel; |
| ● | Pursuant to the terms of the Israeli government grants we received for research and development expenditures related to our historical business, we are obligated to pay certain royalties on our revenues from our legacy products to the Israeli government. In addition, the terms of an Israeli government grant we received require us to satisfy specified conditions and to make additional payments in addition to repayment of the grants upon certain events; |
| ● | Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder are governed by Israeli law, which differ in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies; |
| ● | It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of a U.S. court against us, certain of our officers and directors or the Israeli experts named in this Annual Report in Israel or the United States, to assert U.S. securities laws claims in Israel or to serve process on certain of our officers and directors and these experts; |
| ● | Provisions of Israeli law and our amended articles of association may delay, prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, us, even when the terms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders; and |
| ● | We may become subject to claims for payment of compensation for assigned service inventions by our current or former employees relating to our historical business, which could result in litigation and adversely affect our business. |
Risks Related to Ownership of our Ordinary Shares
| ● | We incur and will continue to incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company in the United States, and our management is required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives; |
| ● | If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, the price of our ordinary shares may be adversely affected; |
| ● | We may be unable to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, which could result in the delisting of our ordinary shares from Nasdaq; |
| ● | We are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, we are not subject to U.S. proxy rules and are subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reporting obligations that, to some extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those applicable to a U.S. issuer; |
6
| ● | As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted, to follow, and follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of otherwise applicable Nasdaq requirements, which may result in less protection than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic U.S. issuers; |
| ● | If we lose our status as a foreign private issuer under the SEC’s rules, our compliance costs will increase; |
| ● | Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the NIS and the Euro and inflation may negatively affect our earnings and we may not be able to hedge our currency exchange risks successfully; |
| ● | We have never declared or paid a dividend and currently do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our securities; |
| ● | If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about us or our business or publish unfavorable research about us or our business, the price of our securities and their trading volume could decline; |
| ● | Our stock price has and may be subject to fluctuation, and purchasers of our securities could incur substantial losses; |
| ● | The trading market for our ordinary shares is not always active, liquid and orderly, which may inhibit the ability of our shareholders to sell ordinary shares; |
| ● | We have broad discretion in how we use the net proceeds from our financings, and we may not use these proceeds effectively; and |
| ● | Our business, operating results and growth rates may be adversely affected by current or future unfavorable economic and market conditions and adverse developments with respect to financial institutions and associated liquidity risk. |
Risks Related to Taxation
| ● | There is a risk that we could be treated as a domestic (U.S.) corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes by reason of the transactions related to our acquisition of all of the business operations and substantially all of the assets of Check-Cap LLC on May 31, 2009 (the “Reorganization”); |
| ● | We may be eligible for tax benefits from government programs relating to our historical assets, which require us to meet certain conditions, including regarding the location of our property, plant and equipment and manufacturing in Israel. We can provide no assurance that we would continue to be eligible for such benefits and/or that any such benefits will not be terminated in the future; and |
| ● | There is a risk that we may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors. |
7
Risks Related to the Merger
The consummation of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, which may not be satisfied on a timely basis, if at all.
On September 12, 2025, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into MBody AI, with MBody AI surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Merger was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 14, 2025. The consummation of the Merger remains subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions, including, among others, that no governmental authority shall have issued any order preventing the Merger, the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting periods under antitrust laws, the accuracy of representations and warranties of each party, the performance by each party of its covenants and obligations in all material respects, and the absence of a material adverse effect with respect to either party. We cannot assure you that all of the conditions will be satisfied or waived. If the conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Merger will not occur or will be delayed, and we may lose some or all of the intended benefits of the Merger. The Merger Agreement provides that either party may terminate the agreement if the Merger is not consummated by June 30, 2026.
Our shareholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest in, and will exercise less influence over the management of, the Company following the consummation of the Merger.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each share of MBody AI capital stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be converted into the right to receive ordinary shares of the Company such that, following the closing, the former MBody AI shareholders will own approximately 90% of the Company’s outstanding share capital on a fully diluted and as-converted basis, and the Company’s shareholders prior to the closing will own approximately 10%. Accordingly, the issuance of ordinary shares to MBody AI’s shareholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement will significantly reduce the relative voting power of each ordinary share held by the Company’s existing shareholders. Consequently, existing shareholders will exercise substantially less influence over the management and policies of the Company than they did prior to the consummation of the Merger.
During the pendency of the Merger, the Company is subject to operating restrictions and limitations on its ability to pursue alternative transactions, which could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
The Merger Agreement contains covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to operate its business during the period between signing and closing. During this interim period, the Company is required to operate in the ordinary course of business and is subject to restrictions on, among other things, declaring dividends or distributions, amending its organizational documents, issuing securities (subject to limited exceptions), making capital expenditures in excess of $50,000, entering into material contracts, and acquiring or disposing of material assets, in each case without the prior written consent of MBody AI. In addition, the Company is subject to a no-solicitation covenant under which it is prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging, or entering into certain transactions with third parties. The Company may consider a Superior Offer (as defined in the Merger Agreement), subject to compliance with specific notice and procedural requirements. These restrictions may prevent the Company from pursuing other opportunities that may arise or from taking actions that would otherwise be in the best interests of shareholders and may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Company has incurred and expects to continue to incur substantial transaction-related costs in connection with the Merger.
The Company has incurred, and expects to continue to incur, a number of non-recurring transaction-related costs associated with the Merger and the related transactions, which cannot be accurately estimated at this time. These fees and costs have been, and will continue to be, substantial. Non-recurring transaction costs include, but are not limited to, fees paid to legal, financial, and other advisors, SEC filing costs, printing costs, and other regulatory expenses. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the Company’s business, which may be higher than expected and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.
The Company may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger.
The success of the Merger will depend on the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives following the closing, including successfully integrating MBody AI’s business and operations, retaining key personnel, maintaining and expanding customer relationships, and raising the necessary capital to fund operations. The integration of MBody AI’s business involves a number of risks, including difficulties in combining operations and personnel, the potential disruption of each company’s ongoing business, the possible inability to maintain uniform standards, controls, policies, and procedures, and unanticipated expenses and liabilities. If the Company is not able to achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the Merger may not be realized fully, may take longer to realize than expected, or may not be realized at all.
8
MBody AI has a limited operating history and an evolving business model, which makes it difficult to evaluate its prospects and may increase the risk that the Merger will not achieve its objectives.
MBody AI was incorporated in October 2024 and has a limited operating history. MBody AI’s business model is still evolving and its future success depends on, among other things, its ability to develop and commercialize its robotics and artificial intelligence platform, attract and retain customers, and scale its operations. There can be no assurance that MBody AI’s business strategy will be successful or that its technology and services will achieve broad market acceptance. The Company has limited historical financial data on which to base its evaluation of MBody AI’s prospects, and MBody AI’s limited operating history makes it difficult to predict future performance. If MBody AI’s business does not develop as expected, the Company may not realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger and the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
The Company may become involved in securities litigation or shareholder derivative litigation in connection with the Merger, and this could divert the attention of management and harm the Company’s business.
Securities litigation or shareholder derivative litigation frequently follows the announcement of certain significant business transactions. The Company may become involved in this type of litigation in connection with the Merger and is currently involved in shareholder derivative litigation relating to the Apollo BCA. Litigation often is expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect the business of the Company.
We are substantially dependent on our remaining key employees to facilitate the consummation of the Merger and the transition of the Company’s business.
As a result of our cash conservation activities, we maintain a significantly reduced workforce. Our ability to successfully complete the Merger and integrate with MBody AI’s business operations depends in large part on our ability to retain certain key personnel. Despite our efforts to retain these employees, one or more may terminate their employment on short notice. The loss of the services of any of these employees could potentially harm our ability to complete the Merger, run our day-to-day business operations, and fulfill our reporting obligations as a public company.
If the Merger is not completed, the Company will require significant additional funding in order to continue operations, and if additional capital is not available, the Company may have to cease operations.
The Merger was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 14, 2025. The consummation of the Merger remains subject to the satisfaction of certain customary closing conditions. There can be no assurance that these conditions will be satisfied on a timely basis, if at all. If the Merger is not completed for any reason, the Company will need to evaluate its strategic alternatives and will require significant additional funding in order to continue its operations. The Company previously entered into the Keystone BCA in August 2023, which was terminated in December 2023 after failing to receive the requisite shareholder approval, and the Apollo BCA in March 2024, which will be subsequently terminated upon closing of the Merger. The Company has incurred significant costs in connection with each of these transactions. A failure to complete the Merger would further deplete the Company’s limited resources. In addition, if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to pay MBody AI a termination fee of up to $2.5 million. If adequate additional financing on acceptable terms is not available, the Company’s ability to continue to support its business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited, and the Company may have to curtail or cease operations.
9
The termination of the Apollo BCA is contingent on the closing of the Merger, and if the Merger is not completed, the Apollo BCA an the related loan agreements will remain in effect.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and the BCA Termination Agreement, at the effective time of the closing of the Merger, the Apollo BCA will be terminated by mutual consent of the parties such that no termination fee will be due to Apollo or the will remain in effect. In such event, the Company would need to evaluate its options with respect to the Apollo BCA, which could include pursuing the transactions contemplated thereby, negotiating a termination, or taking other actions, any of which could require the expenditure of additional resources and management attention. There can be no assurance that the resolution of the Apollo BCA on terms favorable to the Company would be achieved outside the context of the Merger.
Risks Related to MBody AI’s Business and Operations
MBody AI has a limited operating history and an evolving business model, which makes it difficult to evaluate its future prospects.
MBody AI was incorporated in October 2024 and has a limited operating history as an embedded AI software and service company. As a result, there is limited historical information upon which investors can evaluate its business, operating results, or future prospects. MBody AI’s business model, technology platform, and go-to-market strategy continue to evolve, and there can be no assurance that its current approach will result in sustainable growth or profitability.
MBody AI currently relies on a limited number of customers, and the loss or reduction of business from any customer could materially adversely affect its results of operations.
MBody AI currently derives a significant portion of its revenue from a small number of enterprise customers. While certain customer arrangements have multi-year terms, some customer agreements may be terminable under certain circumstances. The loss of a customer, a reduction in deployment scope, delays in implementation, or a failure to expand existing deployments could materially and adversely affect MBody AI’s revenue, operating results, and business prospects.
MBody AI’s platform is deployed through a phased and evolving feature set, which may affect the timing and scope of customer adoption.
MBody AI’s platform is deployed through a staged rollout of features, with certain capabilities delivered incrementally or provided to customers through asynchronous analysis and reporting rather than fully integrated real-time operation. While this approach is intended to support ongoing refinement and optimization of the platform, there can be no assurance that all planned features will be completed on schedule, fully integrated, or deliver the anticipated operational benefits. Delays in development, integration challenges, or performance limitations could affect customer satisfaction, the pace of deployment expansion, or the renewal of customer arrangements. MBody AI relies in part on asynchronous deployment, data collection, and analysis, which in certain circumstances may limit customer adoption, expansion, or perceived value of the platform.
MBody AI’s operations depend on third-party vendors, deployment partners, and hardware suppliers.
MBody AI does not manufacture robots or autonomous hardware and relies on third-party vendors, integrators, and partners for hardware procurement, deployment, financing, and maintenance. This comprehensive service model involves customized deployments and coordination with customer personnel. As a result, MBody AI’s operations are subject to several material risks related to these third-party dependencies:
Procurement and Inventory Risk: MBody AI is responsible for the procurement of third-party hardware to fulfill turnkey customer orders. Any failure by its suppliers to deliver units on schedule, in sufficient quantities, or at anticipated price points could delay customer implementations, increase deployment costs, or impair our ability to meet its revenue targets.
10
Integration and Technical Compatibility: MBody AI’s proprietary AI Orchestrator™ must integrate with various types of third-party hardware to deliver a “unified command layer”. Disruptions in technical relationships, changes to Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) firmware, or lack of access to critical APIs could cause service failures, limit platform functionality, or hinder its ability to coordinate heterogeneous robot fleets.
Geopolitical and Supply Chain Sensitivity: Certain components or systems may be sourced from vendors located outside the United States, including in jurisdictions subject to evolving trade policies, export controls, or geopolitical tensions. These factors could increase MBody AI’s deployment costs, compress hardware margins, or result in supply chain delays that materially adversely affect its results of operations.
Dependence on Financing and Maintenance Partners: MBody AI’s business involves complex implementation and ongoing operational support. MBody AI relies on third-party partners for hardware, parts and software updates. Any failure by these partners to perform could result in increased costs, contractual disputes, reputational harm, or reduced demand for MBody AI’s offerings causing a material adverse effect on its business.
MBody AI’s business involves complex implementation and service delivery, which may expose it to operational risks.
MBody AI’s services often involve customized deployments across customer facilities, coordination with customer personnel, and ongoing operational support. These activities may involve unforeseen technical, logistical, or operational challenges. Failure to effectively manage deployments, services, or customer expectations could result in increased costs, contractual disputes, reputational harm, or reduced demand for MBody AI’s offerings.
Customer Adoption, ROI, and Budget Cycles could adversely affect MBody AI’s revenue, growth, and operating results.
Customer adoption, expansion, and renewal of MBody AI’s platform may depend on customers achieving expected operational benefits and on customer budget cycles. MBody AI’s customers may evaluate continued or expanded deployment of the Company’s platform based on perceived operational savings, efficiency improvements, or return on investment. These evaluations may be influenced by customer-specific factors, including budget cycles, capital allocation priorities, labor conditions, macroeconomic factors, and internal approval processes. Even if customers are satisfied with MBody AI’s platform, delays in expansion decisions, reductions in deployment scope, or changes in customer priorities could adversely affect MBody AI’s revenue, growth, and operating results.
Dependence on Customer Facilities and Operating Environments could delay deployments, increase costs, or affect the performance or scalability of MBody AI’s platform.
MBody AI’s deployments depend on customer-controlled facilities and operating environments, which are outside of its control. MBody AI’s platform is deployed within customer facilities and physical environments that are owned and operated by customers. Deployment timelines, system performance, and operational outcomes may be affected by factors outside MBody AI’s control, including facility layout, network infrastructure, physical access constraints, operational schedules, and coordination with customer personnel. Limitations or changes in customer-controlled environments could delay deployments, increase costs, or affect the performance or scalability of MBody AI’s platform.
Integration with Third-Party Software and Systems could increase deployment costs, delay implementations, or reduce customer satisfaction.
MBody AI’s platform may require integration with third-party software systems used by customers, which may present technical and operational challenges. Customer deployments of MBody AI’s platform may require integration with third-party software systems, including facility management, scheduling, or reporting systems. Such integrations may involve technical complexity, reliance on third-party interfaces or application programming interfaces, and coordination with customers or third-party vendors. Changes to third-party systems, integration delays, or compatibility issues could increase deployment costs, delay implementations, or reduce customer satisfaction.
11
MBody AI operates in regulated environments and may be subject to regulatory requirements that could increase costs or limit growth.
MBody AI’s customers operate in regulated industries, including hospitality, gaming, and potentially healthcare and data centers. In certain jurisdictions, deployment of autonomous systems may require regulatory approvals, licenses, or compliance with industry-specific rules, including gaming or safety regulations. Regulatory requirements may change over time, differ by jurisdiction, or impose additional compliance costs, which could adversely affect MBody AI’s ability to deploy its platform or expand into new markets.
MBody AI may face liability or compliance exposure related to the operation of autonomous systems.
Although MBody AI does not manufacture hardware, it sells, procures, finances, and/or supports the deployment of third-party autonomous hardware in connection with its software platform. MBody AI’s software influences the operation and coordination of autonomous systems deployed in customer environments, and its involvement in hardware procurement, deployment, or ongoing services may increase its exposure to claims, investigations, or regulatory scrutiny related to system performance, safety incidents, or operational failures, whether or not caused by its software. Such matters could result in litigation, regulatory action, reputational harm, or increased insurance, indemnification, or compliance costs.
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence, robotics, and autonomous systems is evolving and may adversely affect its business.
Laws and regulations governing artificial intelligence, robotics, and autonomous systems are evolving in the United States and internationally. New or modified requirements related to safety, accountability, transparency, data use, or deployment of AI-enabled systems could impose additional compliance obligations, restrict certain applications, or increase regulatory oversight. Because MBody AI’s platform influences the operation and coordination of autonomous systems deployed in physical environments, regulatory changes may require modifications to its technology, deployment practices, or business model, increase operating costs, delay deployments, or limit market opportunities. Failure to comply with applicable or future regulations could result in fines, penalties, litigation, or reputational harm, any of which could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
MBody AI has a history of operating losses and may not achieve or sustain profitability.
MBody AI has incurred operating losses since inception and expects to continue to incur expenses as it grows its operations, develops its platform, and expands customer deployments. Although MBody AI may achieve profitability in future periods, there can be no assurance that it will do so or that profitability, if achieved, will be sustainable.
MBody AI will require additional capital to execute its business plan, and such capital may not be available on acceptable terms.
MBody AI expects to require additional financing to fund its operations, growth initiatives, and platform development. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available when needed, on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain additional financing could materially adversely affect MBody AI’s ability to continue operations or execute its business strategy.
Future financings may result in dilution and could adversely affect shareholders.
MBody AI may raise capital through equity issuances, convertible securities, debt financings, or other structured transactions. Such financings may result in significant dilution to existing shareholders, impose restrictive covenants, or grant preferential rights to new investors. Market conditions, stock price volatility, and Nasdaq compliance considerations may further limit financing alternatives.
MBody AI operates in a rapidly evolving and competitive market.
The markets for artificial intelligence, automation, and autonomous systems are rapidly evolving and highly competitive. New technologies, business models, and competitors may emerge that could reduce demand for MBody AI’s platform or render its offerings less competitive.
12
MBody AI’s success depends on its ability to attract and retain key personnel.
MBody AI’s future success depends on the continued services of its management team and technical personnel. Competition for qualified employees is intense, and the loss of key personnel or inability to attract additional talent could materially adversely affect its business.
If the Merger does not close, the debt-for-equity exchange with Apollo will not close, the Apollo BCA will remain in effect, and approximately $16.3 million of loans to Apollo may not be recoverable.
The Company has made loans to Apollo in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $16.3 million (the “Apollo Loans”). On June 30, 2025, the Company and Apollo entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) providing for the Apollo Loans to be exchanged for common shares representing a 7.5% equity interest in Apollo. Closing of the Exchange Agreement is conditioned on the closing of the Merger. If the Merger does not close, the Exchange Agreement will not close, the Company will continue to hold the Apollo Loans as receivables, recovery is uncertain, and the Apollo BCA will remain in effect and may limit the Company’s flexibility to pursue alternative strategic transactions.
The Company recognized the exchange effective November 14, 2025 following 98.01% shareholder approval of the Merger, based on management’s determination that the closing condition ceased to be substantive at that date. As of December 31, 2025, the equity investment is carried at $6,525,000 under ASC 321, and a payable of approximately $1,400,000 remains outstanding to Apollo. Legal closing of the Exchange Agreement has not occurred. If the Merger closes and the Exchange Agreement closes, the Company will hold an illiquid minority interest in a private company with no governance rights and no readily determinable fair value, and there can be no assurance the Company will realize the carrying value, or any value, from the investment.
Risks Related to Our Financial Position
We have a history of losses, may incur future losses and require additional funding in order to complete the development of our products and technology. If additional capital is not available and we cease the development of our products and technology or are obligated to relinquish rights to our intellectual property, we may not ever achieve profitability and be forced to liquidate.
We are a clinical and development-stage medical diagnostics company with a limited operating history, and our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash. We have historically incurred net losses since we commenced operations in 2009. We incurred net income of $4.1 million in 2025, and net losses of $25.1 million in 2024, and $17.6 million in 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, our accumulated deficit was $165.9 million. On March 21, 2023, we announced that following our internal assessment of the clinical data collected from the calibration studies until such date, we determined that the most recent efficacy results from our calibration studies did not meet the goal to proceed to the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study and, as such, the initiation of the second part of the U.S. pivotal study that was expected in mid-2023 was also postponed. On June 6, 2023, we announced that after further review of additional data and interaction with the FDA on a revised pivotal study protocol together with the anticipated time and investment necessary to further develop the technology, we were reducing our workforce significantly to reduce cash burn, concentrating our resources on essential research activities, discontinuing our calibration studies, and evaluating and pursuing strategic options. As a result of our evaluation and pursuit of strategic options, on August 16, 2023, we entered into the Keystone BCA. At our 2023 annual general meeting of shareholders, such business combination transactions did not receive the requisite majority required for approval under Section 320 of the Israeli Companies Law 5759-1999. On December 24, 2023, we received a notice on behalf of Keystone, terminating the Keystone BCA in light of the results. On March 25, 2024, we entered into a business combination agreement with Apollo. In May 2024, we reimbursed Apollo $3,808,815 pursuant to the provisions of the Apollo BCA. On September 4, 2025, the Company acquired certain assets relating to a Ghost Kitchen area representative business. On September 12, 2025, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement.
13
We expect that we will need substantial amounts of cash resources in order to complete the development of the products and technology derived from our intellectual property so that we can find new or alternative ways to redeploy them into other existing or new products and technologies. We intend to use our limited cash resources to support these efforts, including through the Business Combination. See Item 5B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Sources of Liquidity.”
Moreover, we may seek additional funding through equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, licensing arrangements or any other means. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, you may experience significant dilution of your ownership interest, and the newly issued securities may have rights senior to those of the holders of our ordinary shares. In addition, the issuance of additional equity securities by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline. Alternatively, if we raise funds by obtaining loans from third parties, the terms of those financing arrangements may include negative covenants, may require us to grant a lender a security interest in our assets or may include other restrictions on our business that could impair our operational flexibility, and could also result in high interest expense. If we raise additional funds through collaborations, licensing arrangements or other structured financing transactions, we may relinquish rights to certain of our technologies or products, grant security interests in our assets or grant licenses to third parties on terms that are unfavorable to us.
Securing additional financing may divert our management’s attention from its day-to-day activities, which may adversely further delay and affect our ability to complete the development of our products and technology and such additional financing may not be available to us on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Accordingly, the extent of our future operating losses, the timing or even the potential of becoming profitable are highly uncertain, and we may never achieve or sustain profitability. Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The issuance of ordinary shares in connection with the Merger will substantially dilute the relative voting power of shareholders of Check-Cap prior to the closing of the Merger, and, as a result, such shareholders prior to the closing of the Merger will exercise substantially less influence over the management of the Company following the consummation of the Merger.
Following the closing of the Merger, shareholders of Check-Cap prior to the closing of the Merger (the “Previous Shareholders”) are expected to own approximately 10% of the Company’s outstanding share capital, on a fully diluted and as-converted basis, and the MBody AI shareholders are expected to own approximately 90% of the Company’s outstanding share capital, on a fully-diluted and as-converted basis. Accordingly, the issuance of ordinary shares to MBody AI’s shareholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement will significantly reduce the relative voting power of each ordinary share held by the Previous Shareholders. Consequently, the Previous Shareholders will exercise substantially less influence over the management and policies of the Company than they did prior to the consummation of the Merger.
The Company has incurred and expects to continue to incur substantial transaction-related costs in connection with the Merger.
The Company has incurred, and expects to continue to incur, a number of non-recurring transaction-related costs associated with the Merger and the related transactions, which cannot be accurately estimated at this time. These fees and costs have been, and will continue to be, substantial. Non-recurring transaction costs include, but are not limited to, fees paid to legal and other advisors, SEC filing costs and printing costs. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the Company’s business, which may be higher than expected and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.
14
The Company may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger.
The success of the Merger and the related transactions will depend on the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives and raise the necessary capital to fund its operations. If the Company is not able to achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the Merger and the related transactions may not be realized fully, may take longer to realize than expected, or may not be realized at all.
The Company may become involved in securities litigation or shareholder derivative litigation in connection with the Merger, and this could divert the attention of management and harm the Company’s business.
Securities litigation or shareholder derivative litigation frequently follows the announcement of certain significant business transactions. The Company may become involved in this type of litigation in connection with the Merger and is currently involved in shareholder derivative litigation relating to the Apollo BCA. Litigation often is expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect the business of the Company.
If the Merger is not completed, the Company will require significant additional funding in order to continue operations, and if additional capital is not available, the Company may have to cease operations.
The Merger was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 14, 2025. The consummation of the Merger remains subject to the satisfaction of certain customary closing conditions. There can be no assurance that these conditions will be satisfied on a timely basis, if at all. If the Merger is not completed for any reason, the Company will need to evaluate its strategic alternatives and will require significant additional funding in order to continue its operations. The Company previously entered into a business combination agreement with Apollo in March 2024, and the Company incurred significant costs in connection with that transaction, including the reimbursement of approximately $3.8 million to Apollo. A failure to complete the Merger would further deplete the Company’s limited resources. If adequate additional financing on acceptable terms is not available, the Company’s ability to continue to support its business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited, and the Company may have to curtail or cease operations.
Our management and board of directors have concluded that a substantial doubt is deemed to exist concerning our ability to continue as a going concern.
Accounting standards require management to assess our ability to continue as a going concern for one year after the date the financial statements are issued. As discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, conditions exist that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for the one-year period from the date these financial statements are issued. Management’s plans to address these conditions — principally the pending Merger and the ARC ELOC Facility — depend on external approvals and market conditions outside our sole control and are not, under ASC 205-40, probable of alleviating that doubt. These conditions could materially adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares, our access to additional capital, our ability to complete the Merger, and our relationships with counterparties and employees. If our plans do not materialize, we may be required to wind down operations or liquidate our assets, and the values realized could be materially less than those reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
Risks Related to the ARC ELOC Facility
It is not possible to predict the actual number of shares we will sell under the Purchase Agreement to ARC, or the actual gross proceeds resulting from those sales.
On December 17, 2025, we entered into the Purchase Agreement with ARC, pursuant to which ARC has committed to purchase up to $30.0 million of our ordinary shares, subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement. The ordinary shares that may be issued under the Purchase Agreement may be sold by us to the ARC at our discretion from time to time over a three-year period commencing on the date of the Purchase Agreement. We generally have the right to control the timing and amount of any sales of our ordinary shares to ARC under the Purchase Agreement. Sales of our ordinary shares, if any, to ARC under the Purchase Agreement will depend upon market conditions and other factors. We may ultimately decide to sell to ARC all, some or none of the ordinary shares that may be available for us to sell to ARC pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. Because the purchase price per share to be paid by ARC for the ordinary shares that we may elect to sell to ARC under the Purchase Agreement, if any, will fluctuate based on the market prices of ordinary shares during the applicable purchase valuation period for each purchase made pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, it is not possible for us to predict, as of the date of this annual report and prior to any such sales, the total number of ordinary shares that we will sell to ARC under the Purchase Agreement, the purchase price per share that ARC will pay for shares purchased from us under the Purchase Agreement, or the aggregate gross proceeds that we will receive from those purchases by ARC under the Purchase Agreement.
15
Investors who buy shares at different times will likely pay different prices.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we will have discretion, subject to market demand, to vary the timing, prices, and numbers of shares sold to ARC. If and when we do elect to sell ordinary shares to ARC pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, ARC may resell, some or none of such shares at any time or from time to time in its discretion and at different prices. As a result, investors who purchase shares from ARC at different times will likely pay different prices for those shares, and therefore, may experience different levels of dilution and in some cases substantial dilution and different outcomes in their investment results. In addition, investors may experience a decline in the value of the shares they purchase from ARC as a result of future sales made by us to ARC at prices lower than the prices such investors paid for their shares.
We may require additional financing to sustain our operations, and such financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
The extent to which we rely on ARC as a source of funding will depend on a number of factors, including the prevailing market price of our ordinary shares, our ability to meet the conditions necessary to deliver Advance Notices (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) under the Purchase Agreement and the extent to which we are able to secure funding from other sources. Regardless of the amount of funds we ultimately raise under the Purchase Agreement, if any, we may continue to seek other sources of funding. Even if we were to sell to ARC the total commitment of $30.0 million under the Purchase Agreement, we may still need additional capital to fully implement our business plan. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and any inability to obtain such financing could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Future sales and issuances of our ordinary shares or other securities might result in significant dilution and could cause the price of our ordinary shares to decline.
To raise capital, including pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we may sell ordinary shares, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. We may sell shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is less than the price per share paid by investors, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing shareholders. The price per share at which we sell additional ordinary shares, or securities convertible or exchangeable into ordinary shares, in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share previously paid by investors. Any sales of additional shares will dilute our shareholders. Sales of a substantial number of ordinary shares in the public market or the perception that these sales might occur could depress the market price of our ordinary shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to predict the effect that sales may have on the prevailing market price of our ordinary shares. In addition, the sale of substantial numbers of our ordinary shares could adversely impact their price.
We undertake to seek shareholder approval to re-designate our ordinary shares as no-par value, and there can be no assurance that such re-designation will be completed.
The ordinary shares currently have a nominal value of NIS 48.0 per share. Our board of directors undertakes that it will not seek to make calls on or forfeit the shares offered at any time if the nominal amount per share has not been paid. We also undertake to include on the agenda for our next annual general meeting of shareholders a proposal to amend our amended articles of association to re-designate the ordinary shares as no-par value shares, subject to applicable law and shareholder approval. Any delay or failure to complete the re-designation could limit our flexibility to issue ordinary shares, including under the Purchase Agreement, and could adversely affect our ability to raise capital.
Risks Related to the Acquisition of Ghost Kitchen Franchise Rights in New Jersey
The Company may not realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Ghost Kitchen franchise rights in New Jersey, including generating revenue from the acquired Ghost Kitchen area representative operations.
On September 4, 2025, the Company entered into that certain Asset Purchase Agreement with Parea LLC (the “Parea APA”) to acquire certain assets relating to a Ghost Kitchen area representative business for the State of New Jersey. The acquisition is intended to provide the Company with a source of near-term revenue from franchise area representative operations. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will successfully integrate the acquired assets, generate revenue from the Ghost Kitchen operations, or realize the anticipated benefits of this acquisition. The Company’s ability to generate revenue from the acquired operations will depend on a number of factors, including the performance of the Ghost Kitchen franchise system, the Company’s ability to manage area representative operations, and prevailing market conditions in the New Jersey territory. If the Company is unable to generate expected revenue or if the Ghost Kitchen franchise system experiences operational difficulties, the acquisition may not contribute to the Company’s financial performance as anticipated.
16
The Company issued 1,169,596 ordinary shares as consideration for the Parea APA, and the eventual availability of those shares for resale in the public market could adversely affect the price of our ordinary shares.
In connection with the Parea APA, the Company issued 1,169,596 Ordinary Shares as consideration to the sellers. While these shares are subject to a two-year lock-up period and a two-year voting agreement with the Company, upon expiration of the lock-up period the shares will become available for resale in the public market. The resale of a significant number of these shares, or the perception that such resales may occur, could adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares. In addition, the issuance of the consideration shares resulted in dilution to existing shareholders.
Risks Related to Our Historical Business Operations
Although we received FDA approval of our IDE (including our IDE amended application) for our U.S. pivotal study, the most recent efficacy results from our studies did not meet the goal to proceed to the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study, as such we cannot provide any assurance that we will ever be able to redesign such study or redeploy our technology into other potentially viable products.
We received FDA approval of our IDE and our IDE amended application for our planned U.S. pivotal study. While we initiated the first part of the U.S. pivotal study in May 2022, the initiation of the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study was dependent upon successful completion of the calibration portion of the U.S. pivotal study. On March 21, 2023, we announced that following our internal assessment of the clinical data collected from the calibration studies until such date, we determined that the most recent efficacy results from our calibration studies did not meet the goal to proceed to the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study and, as such, the initiation of the second part of the U.S. pivotal study that was expected in mid-2023 was also postponed. On June 6, 2023, we announced that after further review of additional data and interaction with the FDA on a revised pivotal study protocol together with the anticipated time and investment necessary to further develop the technology, we were reducing our workforce significantly to reduce cash burn, concentrating our resources on essential research activities, discontinuing our calibration studies, and evaluating and pursuing strategic options.
In light of such developments, we cannot provide any timeline or assurance of when, if ever, or whether we will be able to compile an IDE supplement for submission to the FDA. There can be no assurance that the FDA would approve any such an IDE supplement or that we will be ever able to commence or complete the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study. Furthermore, even if we were able to redesign the study and submit such IDE supplement, the FDA or other regulatory authority may require us to complete additional studies or satisfy other FDA or other regulatory requests, which would further delay any further U.S. pivotal studies.
As a result of the foregoing, our ability to redesign our U.S. studies, complete the development of our products and technology for the redeployment into other potentially viable products is inherently uncertain, and may take significant time to complete, if any such options are ever completed at all.
17
Clinical failure can occur at any stage of clinical development and we may not succeed in completing the development of our product. Any product we advance through clinical trials may require further clinical validation and may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval.
Clinical failure can occur at any stage of clinical development, and we may not succeed in completing the development of our product. To date, we have performed clinical studies with iterative versions of both scanning and non-scanning capsules, in conjunction with iterative versions of the C-Scan Track, C-Scan View application. The C-Scan system utilizes ultra-low-dose X- rays to scan the inner lining of the colon for precancerous polyps, and other structural abnormalities. In addition, our clinical trials to date were conducted under differing protocols, while using specific inclusion criteria and enrolling both average risk and high-risk patients (e.g., “enriched population”). Therefore, our ability to identify potential problems and/or inefficiencies concerning current and future versions of C-Scan in advance of its use in general and expanded groups of average risk patients has been limited and we cannot assure you that the actual clinical performance will be satisfactory to support proposed indications, obtain regulatory approvals and gain clinical acceptance and adoption, or that its use will not result in unanticipated complications. Although we continuously collect additional clinical data to improve reliability of our products and technology, we cannot provide any assurance that such studies will yield favorable results. For example, we conducted a study in Israel for which we initially enrolled both average risk and high-risk patients and subsequently shifted to enrollment of only average risk patients commencing in May 2022. The purpose of the additional study was to improve calibration of the C-Scan system, in parallel to conducting the first stage of the U.S. pivotal study that was initiated in May 2022. As part of the approved amended IDE, we designed the U.S. pivotal study to include two stages: the first stage, aimed to support our C-Scan calibration among the average risk population, which is intended to include up to 200 patients in the U.S.; and the second stage, which was intended to include up to 800 subjects (400 in the U.S. and 400 in Israel), aimed to compare the performance of C-Scan to traditional colonoscopy through a statistically powered and randomized study. The initiation of the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study was dependent upon successful completion of the calibration portion of the U.S. pivotal study. Because we determined that the efficacy results from our calibration studies did not meet the goal to proceed to the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study and discontinued further studies, we reduced our workforce to preserve and concentrate our resources on essential research activities and evaluated and pursued strategic options.
Furthermore, results from laboratory, non-clinical and completed clinical studies, as well as results from any ongoing clinical trials may not always be indicative of final clinical results. As such, any product we advance through clinical trials may require further clinical validation and may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval. In addition, the results of clinical trials are subject to human analyses and interpretation of the data accumulated, which could be affected by various errors due to, among others, lack of sufficient clinical experience with C-Scan, assumptions used in the statistical analysis of results, interpretation errors in the analysis of the clinical trials results, including the reconstructed images by C-Scan, or due to uncertainty in the actual efficacy of C-Scan in its current clinical stage. Therefore, the safety and efficacy of C-Scan and the clinical results to date will require further independent professional validation and require further clinical study. If C-Scan does not function as expected over time, we may not be able to develop C-Scan at the rate or to the stage we desire, we could be subject to liability claims, our reputation may be harmed, C-Scan may not achieve regulatory clearances, and C-Scan may not be widely adopted by healthcare providers and patients.
18
We may face a number of challenges with respect to our commercialization efforts and may not succeed in the commercialization of our product, obtain required regulatory approvals or manufacture commercial quantities of C-Scan at an acceptable cost to enable us to generate significant revenues.
Since commencing our operations, we focused on the research and development and limited clinical trials of C-Scan and then reduced investment in research and development activities in anticipation of the initiation of our strategic development plan. Although we previously received a CE-certificate from a notified body according to the EU Regulation 2017/745 on Medical Devices for the marketing and sale of C-Scan in the European Union, valid until December 1, 2026, we were unable to commence marketing and sales in the European Union and, to extent we are able to redesign any study protocols or C-Scan, additional or new regulatory approval in Member States of the European Union, for instance from the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, BfS) may be required before we are able to launch any such redesigned studies or deploy redesigned products or technology. Furthermore, we may require additional regulatory certifications, registrations and/or approvals from regulatory authorities in European jurisdictions outside the European Union, including with the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and the Swiss National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Nagra). In Israel, we received approval from the Medical Devices and Accessories Division of the Israeli Ministry of Health, or AMAR, for the marketing and sale of C-Scan in Israel, which was valid until December 31, 2024. We have not received approvals in other jurisdictions, including the United States, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to receive regulatory approvals to commence marketing and sales for C-Scan in the foreseeable future or ever. Our ability to generate revenues and achieve profitability depends on our ability to successfully complete the development of our C-Scan product, demonstrate sufficient clinical evidence, obtain required regulatory approvals and commercial licenses, and manufacture commercial quantities of C-Scan at an acceptable cost to enable us to generate significant revenues.
The future success of our business cannot be determined at this time, and, in light of recent developments, we do not anticipate generating any revenues from product sales for the foreseeable future. In addition, we have no experience in commercializing C-Scan, so even if we are able to redesign such clinical studies, we may face a number of challenges with respect to our commercialization efforts, including, among others, that:
| ● | we may not have adequate financial or other resources to complete the development of our product, demonstrate adequate clinical results, attain required regulatory approvals and licensures, obtain adequate manufacturing and capacity and begin the commercialization efforts for C-Scan; |
| ● | we may fail to obtain or maintain required regulatory approvals and licensures for C-Scan in our target markets or may face adverse regulatory or legal actions relating to our system even if regulatory approval is obtained; |
| ● | we may not demonstrate adequate clinical safety and clinical effectiveness results from our current or future versions of C-Scan, to support regulatory body approval or market acceptance and adoption; |
| ● | we may face ongoing limitations imposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or NRC, or other nuclear regulatory commissions in jurisdictions in which we intend to commercialize C-Scan in relation to the disposal of our C-Scan Cap in the sanitary system, such as requiring patients to retrieve our C-Scan Cap after use, which could impact engagement with clinical sites and enrollment pace in our clinical studies and make C-Scan less attractive; |
| ● | we may not be able to maintain an adequate supply chain due to reliance on single or sole suppliers for critical components and scale up the manufacture of C-Scan to commercial quantities at an adequate quality or at an acceptable cost; |
19
| ● | we may not be able to establish adequate sales, marketing and distribution channels; |
| ● | healthcare professionals and patients may not accept C-Scan; |
| ● | we may not be aware of possible complications from the continued use of C-Scan because we have limited clinical experience with respect to the actual use of C-Scan; |
| ● | other technological breakthroughs in colorectal cancer, or CRC, screening, treatment and prevention may reduce the demand for C-Scan; |
| ● | changes in the market for CRC screening, new alliances between existing market participants and the entrance of new market participants may interfere with our market penetration efforts; |
| ● | government and private third-party payors may not agree to provide coding, coverage and payment adequate to reimburse healthcare providers and patients for any or all of the purchase price in conjunction with clinical effectiveness of C-Scan, which may adversely affect healthcare providers’ and patients’ willingness to purchase C-Scan; |
| ● | uncertainty as to market demand may result in inefficient pricing of C-Scan; and |
| ● | we may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property or may face third-party claims of intellectual property infringement. |
If we determine to resume the development of C-Scan and are unable to meet any one or more of these challenges successfully, our ability to complete the development of and effectively commercialize C-Scan could be limited, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have limited manufacturing experience and currently have no manufacturing capabilities. If we resume development of C-Scan and are unable to scale up our manufacturing operations to develop our products, our growth could be limited and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We currently have limited resources, facilities and experience in manufacturing. Following the determination to discontinue our clinical studies and conserve our resources, on September 8, 2023, we terminated our sub-lease agreement and service agreement with the sole supplier of the X-ray source used in C-Scan pursuant to which we leased approximately 70 square meters of laboratory production space at the supplier premises and independently produced the X-ray source using our own production employees. See “Information on Our Company - Business - Manufacturing and Suppliers.”
We have in the past, and we may in the future, continue to face technical challenges to obtain, increase or adjust manufacturing capacity, including, among others, equipment design and automation, material procurement and lower than expected yields and increased scrap costs, as well as challenges related to maintaining quality control and assurance standards, manufacturing commercial quantities of products at an acceptable cost and logistics associated with the handling of radioactive materials, such as was the case in our C-Scan Cap, which have resulted in and could result in delays in our clinical trial and commercialization plans and lost revenue. We may be unable to establish or maintain reliable, high-volume manufacturing capacity. Even if we can establish and maintain this capacity, the cost of doing so may increase the cost of our products and reduce our ability to compete successfully. If we resume development of C-Scan and are unable to scale up our manufacturing capabilities to meet market demand, or to achieve adequate product cost, our growth could be limited and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
20
In addition, we received and may receive in the future grants from the Government of the State of Israel through the Innovation Authority of the Ministry of Economy and Industry (the “IIA”) for the financing of a portion of our research and development expenditures and to support the funding of our transition from research and development to manufacturing, pursuant to the Encouragement of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 5744-1984 (formerly known as the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development Law 5744-1984), or the Innovation Law. The terms of the IIA grants subject us to certain restrictions relating to (among other things) the transfer of the manufacturing of IIA-funded products outside Israel. See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Operations in Israel - Pursuant to the terms of the Israeli government grants we received for research and development expenditures, we are obligated to pay certain royalties on our revenues to the Israeli government. In addition, the terms of Israeli government grants we received require us to satisfy specified conditions and to make additional payments in addition to repayment of the grants upon certain events.” Such restrictions may impair our ability to outsource or transfer development or manufacturing activities with respect to any product or technology outside of Israel.
Our reliance on sole or single source suppliers could harm our ability to conduct clinical trials and meet demand for our product in a timely manner or within budget.
We have historically depended on sole or single source suppliers for some of the components and materials necessary for the production of C-Scan. If we determine to resume the development of C-Scan and are required to change the supplier of any of these key components, there may be a significant delay in locating a suitable alternative manufacturer. In addition, we may be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with FDA and other applicable quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines. To the extent we ever are able to redesign the clinical studies for submission to the FDA or other regulatory authorities or redeploy our technology into other potentially viable products, we will be required to find new suppliers, which we may not be able to do in a timely manner. The delays associated with the introduction of a new manufacturer for certain key components or new suppliers for certain materials, could delay our ability to manufacture any redesigned products in a timely manner or within budget. Furthermore, in the event that the manufacturer of a key component of any our products ceases operations or otherwise ceases to do business with us, we may not have access to the information necessary to enable an alternative supplier to manufacture the component. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our ability to complete the development of our products and meet demand in a timely manner or within budget.
The use of any of our C-Scan Cap, C-Scan Track, C-Scan View or any new products and technology could result in product liability or similar claims that could be expensive to defend, damage our reputation and harm our business.
Our business exposes us to an inherent risk of potential product liability or similar claims related to the manufacturing, marketing and sale of medical devices. The medical device industry has historically been litigious, and we face financial exposure to product liability or similar claims if the use of any of our C-Scan Cap, C-Scan Track or C-Scan View were to cause or contribute to injury or death, including, without limitation, harm to the body caused by the procedure or inaccurate diagnoses from the procedure that could affect treatment options. There is also the possibility that defects in the design or manufacture of any of these products or any new products and technology we redesign or redeploy might necessitate a product recall. We do not currently maintain product liability insurance. A product liability claim, regardless of merit or ultimate outcome, or any product recall could result in substantial costs to us, damage to our reputation, customer dissatisfaction and frustration, and a substantial diversion of management attention. A successful claim brought against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have historically depended on third parties to manage our clinical studies and trials, perform related data collection and analysis, and to enroll patients for our clinical trials, and, as a result, we may face costs and delays that are beyond our control.
We have historically relied on third parties, such as third-party clinical research organizations, or CROs, clinical investigators, clinical research coordinators, physicians and clinical sites, to manage our clinical trials and perform data collection and analysis, and to enroll patients for our clinical trials. Although we have and expect to continue to have contractual arrangements with these third parties, we control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on such third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. If such third parties fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications, which would delay the regulatory approval process. Furthermore, we may not be able to control the amount and timing of resources that these parties devote to our studies and trials or the quality of these resources. In addition, our engagement with clinical centers for conducting our clinical trial in the U.S depends upon site-specific licensing and regulatory requirements associated with the X-ray technology within our C-Scan capsules related to nuclear regulatory compliance.
21
If these third parties fail to properly manage our studies and trials or enroll patients for our clinical trials, we will be unable to complete them at all or in a satisfactory or timely manner, which could delay or prevent us from obtaining regulatory approvals for, or achieving market acceptance of, our product.
In addition, termination of relationships with third parties may result in delays, inability to enter into arrangements with alternative third parties or do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional clinical sites involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new clinical site commences work. As a result, delays occur, which can materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines.
We may sell our products in the United States, Europe, Israel and Japan and, if we are unable to manage our operations in these territories, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Our headquarters and substantially all of our operations and employees are presently located in Israel, but we may market our products in the United States, Europe, Israel and Japan. Accordingly, we may be subject to risks associated with international operations, and our international sales and operations may require significant management attention and financial resources. In addition, our international sales and operations may subject us to risks inherent in international business activities, many of which are beyond our control and include, among others:
| ● | foreign certification, registration and other regulatory requirements; |
| ● | customs clearance and shipping delays; |
| ● | import and export controls; |
| ● | trade restrictions; |
| ● | multiple and possibly overlapping tax structures; |
| ● | difficulty forecasting the results of our international operations and managing our inventory due to our reliance on third-party distributors; |
| ● | differing laws and regulations, business and clinical practices, licensures, government and private third-party payor reimbursement policies and patient preferences; |
| ● | differing standards of intellectual property protection among countries; |
| ● | difficulties in staffing and managing our international operations; |
| ● | difficulties in penetrating markets in which our competitors’ products are more established and achieving a competitive sale price for our product; |
| ● | currency exchange rate fluctuations and foreign currency exchange controls and tax rates; and |
| ● | political and economic instability, war or acts of terrorism or natural disasters, emergence of a pandemic, or other widespread health emergencies (or concerns over the possibility of such an emergency, including for example, the COVID-19 pandemic). |
If we are unable to manage our international operations effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
22
We may not be successful in establishing and maintaining strategic partnerships, which could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our products and technology.
A part of our strategy is to evaluate and, as deemed appropriate, enter into partnerships in the future when strategically attractive, including potentially with major medical device companies. We face significant competition in seeking appropriate partners for our products and technology, and the negotiation process is time-consuming and complex. Potential partners must view our products and technology as economically valuable in markets they determine to be attractive in light of the terms that we are seeking and other available products for licensing by other companies. Even if we are successful in our efforts to establish strategic partnerships, the terms that we agree upon may not be favorable to us, and we may not be able to maintain such strategic partnerships if, for example, development or approval of a product is delayed or sales of an approved product are disappointing. Any delay in entering into strategic partnership agreements for our products and technology could delay the development and commercialization of any product candidates and reduce their competitiveness even if they reach the market.
In addition, our strategic partners may breach any future agreement with us, and we may not be able to adequately protect our rights under these agreements. Furthermore, our strategic partners will likely negotiate for certain rights to control decisions regarding the development and commercialization of our products and technology, and may not conduct those activities in the same manner as we would do so.
If we fail to establish and maintain strategic partnerships, we will bear all the risks and costs related to the development and commercialization of our products and technology, and we will need to seek additional significant financing, hire additional employees and otherwise develop expertise which we do not have and for which we have not budgeted.
A security breach or disruption or failure of our computer or communications systems could adversely affect us.
Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems, and those of our CROs and other third parties on which we rely, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, cyber-attacks, natural disasters, fire, terrorism, war, and telecommunication and electrical failures. If such an event were to occur and interrupt our operations, it could result in a material disruption to our business. To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, loss of trade secrets or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, including protected health information or personal data of clinical trial participants or employees or former employees, access to our clinical data, or disruption of the manufacturing process, we could incur liability and the further development of our products and technology could be delayed. We may also be vulnerable to cyber-attacks by hackers or other malfeasance. This type of breach of our cybersecurity may compromise our confidential information and/or our financial information and adversely affect our business or result in legal proceedings. Further, these cybersecurity breaches may inflict reputational harm upon us that may result in decreased market value and erode public trust.
We or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely affected by natural disasters, health epidemics or pandemics, and/or war and conflicts and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.
Natural disasters could severely disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our office, manufacturing and/or lab spaces, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as the manufacturing facilities of our third-party contract manufacturers, subcontractors, suppliers, CROs, clinical sites, clinical investigators, clinical coordinators, third parties ongoing activities and schedules or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible for us to continue our plans and business for a substantial period of time. See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Operations in Israel - Our principal offices, research and development facilities our manufacturing sites and some of our suppliers are located in Israel and, therefore, our business, financial condition and results of operation may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel.”
23
Our principal offices, research and development facilities, manufacturing sites and certain key suppliers are located in Israel. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel.
Since October 2023, Israel has experienced heightened and sustained armed conflict and security tensions, including military operations in Gaza, hostilities along Israel’s northern border, missile and drone attacks, and broader regional instability involving neighboring states and non-state actors. Although the intensity and geographic scope of these events have fluctuated, the situation remains unpredictable and could escalate further or persist for an extended period. Past conflicts have disrupted commercial activity in Israel, and similar or more severe disruptions could occur in the future.
In particular, military operations such as Operation Epic Fury and Israel’s ongoing actions against Hezbollah have heightened security risks in northern Israel, including in areas near the Company’s headquarters, resulting at times in rocket alerts, air-defense activity, transportation disruptions and temporary limitations on business operations. These conditions increase the risk of operational interruptions, employee unavailability and logistical delays affecting facilities and personnel located in this region. These conditions have resulted, and may continue to result, in a range of adverse effects on our operations, including, but not limited to:
| ● | Workforce availability constraints, including due to military service obligations of Israeli employees, restrictions on movement, safety concerns, or displacement of personnel; |
| ● | Disruptions to research, development and manufacturing activities, including temporary facility closures, reduced productivity, or delays in product development or commercialization; |
| ● | Supply chain interruptions, including delays in the delivery of raw materials, components or finished goods, higher logistics and shipping costs, increased transit times, or the need to source alternative suppliers; |
| ● | Infrastructure and operational risks, including disruptions to transportation networks, ports, utilities, communications or other critical infrastructure; |
| ● | Increased operating expenses, including costs associated with security measures, insurance, employee support, facility hardening, redundancy planning and business continuity efforts; |
| ● | Restrictions on trade or investment, including the impact of actual or potential sanctions, export control restrictions, trade embargoes, or changes in diplomatic relations between Israel and other countries; |
| ● | Macroeconomic impacts, including volatility in the Israeli economy, currency fluctuations, interest rate changes, credit rating actions, inflationary pressures or reduced access to capital; |
| ● | Reputational risks, including negative perceptions by customers, partners, investors or other stakeholders arising from our presence or activities in Israel, which could affect commercial relationships or demand for our products; and |
| ● | Insurance limitations, including increased premiums, exclusions or the unavailability of coverage for losses resulting from acts of war, terrorism or civil unrest. |
If our facilities, suppliers or logistics partners in Israel were damaged, destroyed or rendered inoperable, or if we were required to suspend or significantly modify operations there for any reason, we may not be able to replace such capacity, personnel or capabilities in a timely or cost-effective manner, if at all. Any prolonged interruption could materially impair our ability to manufacture products, meet customer demand, execute our growth strategy or maintain our competitive position.
24
In addition, regional instability could negatively affect global financial markets, international trade routes or investor confidence more broadly, which could further adversely impact our business, liquidity or market valuation.
Shareholder activism could result in potential operational disruption, divert our resources and management’s attention and have an adverse effect on our business.
Shareholder activism, which may arise in various forms and situations, could divert management’s attention from its current strategies, require us to incur substantial legal, consulting, and public relations fees, and could result in potential operational disruption. For example, on September 29, 2023, Symetryx Corporation, a self-described family office based in Toronto, Canada (“Symetryx”) delivered a letter to Check-Cap in which it demanded that Check-Cap convene an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, the purpose of which would be to dismiss all five then current members of the Check-Cap Board and to appoint five director nominees as proposed by Symetryx. It then filed with the Haifa District Court (Economic Department) a claim against Check-Cap and its directors, to instruct Check-Cap to comply with the resolutions that shall be adopted at the extraordinary general meeting convened by Symetryx. On November 12, 2023, Check-Cap and Symetryx reached a settlement under which Symetryx cancelled the extraordinary shareholders meeting that it purported to self-convene and Check-Cap converted the extraordinary shareholder meeting Symetryx convened to an annual general meeting of shareholders held on December 18, 2023, where the five director nominees proposed by the shareholder were elected to the Board of the Company.
Perceived uncertainties as to our future direction and control arising from shareholder activism may result in the loss of potential business opportunities and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified employees, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results.
Risks Related to Regulations Applicable to Our Historical Business
If we or our future manufacturers or distributors do not obtain and maintain the necessary regulatory clearances or approvals, or equivalent third country approvals in a specific country or region, we or our future distributors will not be able to market and sell C-Scan or future products in that country or region.
To be able to market and sell C-Scan or any future products in a specific country or region, we and/or our distributors must comply with the regulations of that country or region. These regulations, and the time required for regulatory review, vary from country to country. Obtaining regulatory approvals is expensive and time-consuming, and we cannot be certain that we or our distributors will receive regulatory approvals required for C-Scan or any future products in each country or region in which we plan to market such products. We currently do not have a notified body. If we modify C-Scan or any future products, we or our distributors may need to apply for new regulatory approvals, or a notified body may need to review the planned changes before we are permitted to sell the respective products. We may not meet the quality and safety standards required to maintain the authorizations that we or our distributors have received. If we or if permitted, our distributors are unable to maintain our authorizations or CE Certificates in a particular country or region, we will no longer be able to sell C-Scan and/or any potential future products in that country or region, and our ability to generate revenues will be materially and adversely affected.
25
If the indications for use or instructions for use for which the iodinated oral contrast medium is approved are not sufficiently broad to support its use throughout the C-Scan procedure, the FDA or the competent regulatory authorities in the European Union (EU) Member States and other foreign countries may consider that contrast agent is being used off-label.
Ingestion of C-Scan requires the preparatory use of iodinated oral contrast medium to provide a coating for colonic imaging. We cannot be sure that the indications for which iodinated oral contrast medium are approved in the United States, or in other countries is sufficiently broad to cover such use. If the FDA or the competent regulatory authorities in other countries consider that iodinated oral contrast medium is not approved for the purpose for which it is used with the system, we may be considered to promote the off-label use of the iodinated oral contrast medium. Because the promotion of off-label use of drugs or medicinal products is prohibited in the United States, and in other countries, we could face both related issues with the FDA and/or the competent authorities of and/or other countries. In these circumstances, the FDA and/or the competent regulatory authorities and/or other countries may require us to obtain appropriate regulatory approvals for the iodinated oral contrast medium prior to marketing C-Scan with such substances. Under such circumstances, should we fail to obtain approval of the contrast agent for use with C-Scan, in a timely fashion, or at all, this could delay or prevent regulatory clearance or approval of the C-Scan, and our business and financial condition will be adversely affected.
The results of any future clinical trials may not support our product candidate requirements or intended use claims or may result in the discovery of adverse side effects.
Even if future clinical trials are completed, we cannot be certain that their results will support our product requirements or intended use claims, which could inhibit our marketing strategies, or that the FDA, foreign authorities or a notified body will agree with our conclusions regarding them. Success in non-clinical studies and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and we cannot be sure that clinical trials will replicate the results of prior trials. The clinical trial process may fail to demonstrate that C- Scan, or any future products, are safe and effective for the desired or proposed indicated uses, which could cause us to abandon a product and may delay development of others. Any delay or termination of our clinical trials will delay the filing of our product submissions and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize C-Scan, or any future products, and generate revenues. It is also possible that patients enrolled in clinical trials will experience adverse side effects that are not currently part of the product candidate’s profile.
Even if C-Scan or future products are cleared or approved by regulatory authorities or after obtaining CE Certificates from a notified body, modifications to C-Scan or future products may require new regulatory clearances or approvals, new CE Certificates, or may require us to recall or cease marketing it until the necessary clearances, approvals or CE Certificates are obtained.
Once cleared, approved or marketed, modifications to C-Scan or future products may require new regulatory approvals, clearances, including CE Certificates from a notified body, 510(k) clearances or PMAs, or require us to recall or cease marketing the modified devices until these clearances or approvals are obtained. Obtaining clearances and approvals, or new or amended CE Certificates for device modifications can be a time-consuming process, and delays in obtaining required future clearances, approvals, or CE Certificates could adversely affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn could harm our future growth.
Even if C-Scan and future products are cleared or approved by regulatory authorities or after obtaining CE Certificates from a notified body, if we or our suppliers fail to comply with ongoing FDA or other foreign regulatory authority requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products, our products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.
The manufacturing processes, reporting requirements, post-approval clinical data and promotional activities associated with any product for which we obtain clearance, approval or CE Certificates, or equivalent third country approval will be subject to continuous regulatory review, oversight and periodic inspections by the FDA other domestic and foreign regulatory authorities. If any adverse actions relating to the foregoing were to occur, our reputation would be harmed, our product sales and profitability would suffer and we may not be able to generate revenue. Furthermore, our key suppliers may not currently be or may not continue to be in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements which could result in our failure to produce our products on a timely basis and in the required quantities, if at all. Even if regulatory clearance or approval of a product is granted, or after obtaining CE Certificates, such clearance or approval, or CE Certificates may be subject to limitations on the intended uses for which the product may be marketed and reduce our potential to successfully commercialize the product and generate revenue from the product.
26
Our failure to comply with radiation safety or radio frequency regulations in a specific country or region could impair our ability to conduct our clinical trials, or commercially distribute and market C-Scan or any similar product in that country or region.
C-Scan includes a small X-ray source and wireless radio frequency transmitter and receiver and is therefore subject to equipment authorization requirements in a number of countries and regions. In the United States, the EU and Japan, authorities often require advance clearance of all radiation and radio frequency devices before they can be sold or marketed in these jurisdictions, subject to limited exceptions. Competent authorities for such additional approval requirements include the Swiss National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Nagra) and the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, BfS). Modifications to the approved C-Scan version design and specifications may require new or further regulatory clearances or approvals before we are permitted to market and sell a modified C-Scan version. If we are unable to obtain any required clearances or approvals from the authorities responsible for the radiation as well as the radio frequency regulations in these and other jurisdictions, the sale or use of C-Scan or any similar product could be prevented in these countries. Any such action could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our products may in the future be subject to product recalls that could harm our reputation, business and financial results.
The FDA and similar foreign governmental authorities have the authority to require the recall of commercialized products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture or a public health/safety issue. In the case of the FDA, the authority to require a recall must be based on an FDA finding that there is a reasonable probability that the device would cause injury or death. In addition, foreign governmental bodies have the authority to require the recall of our products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues. Once marketed, recalls of any of our products, including C-Scan, would divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. FDA requires that certain classifications of recalls be reported to the FDA within 10 working days after the recall is initiated. Companies are required to maintain certain records of recalls, even if they are not reportable to FDA. We may initiate voluntary recalls involving our products in the future that we determine do not require us to notify the FDA. If the FDA disagrees with our determinations, they could require us to report those actions as recalls. A future recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers and negatively affect our sales. In addition, the FDA could take enforcement action against us based on our failure to report the recalls when they were conducted.
If C-Scan or future products cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury, or malfunction in such a way that causes or contributes to a death or serious injury, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in corrective actions or enforcement actions from regulatory authorities.
If we resume development of C-Scan and obtain approval to commercialize our product, we expect that we will be required to conduct post-market testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or effectiveness of our products, which is costly, and we must comply with medical device reporting requirements, including the reporting of adverse events and malfunctions related to our products.
Under FDA medical device reporting regulations, medical device manufacturers are required to report to the FDA information that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or has malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction of our device (or any similar future product) were to recur. If we fail to investigate and report these events to FDA within the required timeframes, or at all, the FDA could take enforcement action against us.
Under the EU MDR we will now have to comply with the increased requirements of medical devices vigilance provisions. In particular, according to Art. 83 MDR, we are required to have a post-market surveillance system in place in a manner that is proportionate to the risk class and appropriate for the type of device, as an integral part of the quality management system. Depending on the devices’ risk class, either a post market surveillance report or a periodic safety update report, or PSUR, must be created and provided to the competent authority upon request. The PSUR also has to be provided to a notified body. Furthermore, requirements on vigilance and incident reporting are increased and market surveillance competencies of the authorities are strengthened.
27
Accordingly, later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, including unanticipated adverse side effects or adverse side effects of unanticipated severity or frequency, manufacturing problems, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements such as the Quality System Regulations, may result in changes to labeling, restrictions on such products or manufacturing processes, withdrawal of the products from the market, voluntary or mandatory recalls, a requirement to repair, replace or refund the cost of any medical device we manufacture or distribute, fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals or CE Certificates, product seizures, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. If any such adverse event results in legal action taken against us, it will require us to devote sufficient time and capital to the matter, distract management from operating our business, and may harm our reputation. Any such occurrence would adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results and prospects.
Our business is subject to complex environmental and health legislation in various jurisdictions that may increase our costs and our risk of noncompliance.
Our research and development and manufacturing processes, including through our service providers, involve the handling of potentially harmful radioactive and other hazardous materials. Therefore, we and our service providers may be subject to various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including governing the use, shipping, handling, storage and disposal of these materials, and we incur expenses related to compliance with these laws and regulations. If we are found to have violated applicable environmental, health and safety laws, whether as a result of human error, equipment failure or other causes, we could be held liable for damages, penalties and costs of remedial actions and could be subject to work stoppages or delays, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The risk of contamination or injury from these materials cannot be eliminated. If an accident or release of any radioactive or other hazardous material occurs, we could be held liable for resulting damages, including for investigation, remediation and monitoring of the contamination, including the costs of which could be substantial. In addition, we may be required to pay damages or civil judgments in respect of third-party claims, including those relating to personal injury (including exposure to radioactive materials) or contribution claims. In the future, we could be subject to additional environmental requirements or existing environmental laws could become more stringent, which could lead to greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with violations. For example, changes to, or restrictions on, permitting requirements or processes, hazardous or radioactive material storage or handling might require an unplanned capital investment or relocation. If we or our service providers fail to comply with existing or new environmental laws or regulations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Federal and state privacy laws, and equivalent laws of third countries, may increase our costs of operation and expose us to civil and criminal sanctions.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended, and the regulations that have been issued under it, to which we refer collectively as HIPAA, and similar laws outside the United States, contain substantial restrictions and requirements with respect to the use and disclosure of individuals’ protected health information. The HIPAA privacy rules prohibit “covered entities,” such as healthcare providers and health plans, from using or disclosing an individual’s protected health information, unless the use or disclosure is authorized by the individual or is specifically required or permitted under the privacy rules. Under the HIPAA security rules, covered entities must establish administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic protected health information maintained or transmitted by them or by others on their behalf. While we do not believe that we are a covered entity under HIPAA, many of our customers may be covered entities subject to HIPAA. Such customers may require us to enter into business associate agreements, which will obligate us to safeguard certain health information we obtain in the course of our relationship with them, restrict the manner in which we use and disclose such information and impose liability on us for failure to meet our contractual obligations.
In addition, under The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, which was signed into law as part of the U.S. stimulus package in February 2009, certain of HIPAA’s privacy and security requirements are now also directly applicable to “business associates” of covered entities and subject them to direct governmental enforcement for failure to comply with these requirements. We may be deemed as a “business associate” of some of our customers. As a result, we may be subject as a “business associate” to civil and criminal penalties for failure to comply with applicable privacy and security rule requirements. Moreover, HITECH created a new requirement obligating “business associates” to report any breach of unsecured, individually identifiable health information to their covered entity customers and imposes penalties for failing to do so.
28
In addition to HIPAA, most U.S. states have enacted patient confidentiality laws that protect against the disclosure of confidential medical information, and many U.S. states have adopted or are considering adopting further legislation in this area, including privacy safeguards, security standards, and data security breach notification requirements. These U.S. state laws, which may be even more stringent than the HIPAA requirements, are not preempted by the federal requirements, and we are therefore required to comply with them to the extent they are applicable to our operations.
These and other possible changes to HIPAA or other U.S. federal or state laws or regulations, or comparable laws and regulations in countries where we conduct business, could affect our business and the costs of compliance could be significant. Failure by us to comply with any of the standards regarding patient privacy, identity theft prevention and detection, and data security may subject us to penalties, including civil monetary penalties and in some circumstances, criminal penalties. In addition, such failure may damage our reputation and adversely affect our ability to retain customers and attract new customers.
The protection of personal data, particularly patient data, is subject to strict laws and regulations in many countries. The collection and use of personal health data in the EU is governed by the General Data Protection Regulation Reg. EU 2016/679, which became applicable on May 25, 2018, or the GDPR. The GDPR imposes a number of requirements, including an obligation to seek the consent of individuals to whom the personal data relate, the information that must be provided to the individuals, notification of data processing obligations to the competent national data protection authorities of individual EU Member States and the security and confidentiality of the personal data. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the EU to the U.S. Failure to comply with the requirements of the GDPR and the related national data protection laws of the EU Member States may result in fines and other administrative penalties and harm our business. We may incur extensive costs in ensuring compliance with these laws and regulations, particularly if we are considered to be a data controller within the meaning of the GDPR.
If we fail to comply with the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state and third-country laws, we could be subject to criminal and civil penalties and exclusion from federally funded healthcare programs including the Medicare and Medicaid programs and equivalent third-country programs, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
A provision of the Social Security Act, commonly referred to as the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, prohibits the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward the referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for, or recommending the ordering, purchasing or leasing of, items or services payable, in whole or in part, by Medicare, Medicaid or any other federal healthcare program. PPACA, among other things, clarified that a person or entity needs not to have actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it. Although there are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors to the federal Anti- Kickback Statute protecting certain common business arrangements and activities from prosecution or regulatory sanctions, the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that do not fit squarely within an exemption or safe harbor may be subject to scrutiny. The federal Anti-Kickback Statute is very broad in scope and many of its provisions have not been uniformly or definitively interpreted by existing case law or regulations. In addition, most of the states have adopted laws similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, and some of these laws are even broader than the federal Anti-Kickback Statute in that their prohibitions may apply to items or services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs or, in several states, apply regardless of the source of payment. Violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute may result in substantial criminal, civil or administrative penalties, damages, fines and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs.
All of our financial relationships with healthcare providers, purchasers, and others who provide products or services to federal healthcare program beneficiaries are potentially governed by the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state laws. We believe our operations are in compliance with the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state laws. However, we cannot be certain that we will not be subject to investigations or litigation alleging violations of these laws, which could be time-consuming and costly to us and could divert management’s attention from operating our business, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, if our arrangements were found to violate the federal Anti- Kickback Statute or similar state laws, the consequences of such violations would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
29
There are other federal and state laws that may affect our ability to operate, including the federal civil False Claims Act, which prohibits, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment of government funds or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay money to the government or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing, or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. PPACA amended the Social Security Act to provide that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti- Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act. Moreover, we may be subject to other federal false claim laws, including, among others, federal criminal healthcare fraud and false statement statutes that extend to non-government healthcare benefit programs. Moreover, there are analogous state laws. Violations of these laws can result in substantial criminal, civil or administrative penalties, damages, fines and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs.
Similar restrictions are imposed by the national legislation of many third countries in which our medical devices will be marketed. Moreover, the provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1997 and other similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from providing money or anything of value to officials of foreign governments, foreign political parties, or international organizations with the intent to obtain or retain business or seek a business advantage. Recently, there has been a substantial increase in anti-bribery law enforcement activity by U.S. regulators, with more aggressive and frequent investigations and enforcement by both the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice. A determination that our operations or activities violated United States or foreign laws or regulations could result in imposition of substantial fines, interruption of business, loss of supplier, vendor or other third-party relationships, termination of necessary licenses and permits, and other legal or equitable sanctions. In addition, lawsuits brought by private litigants may also follow as a consequence.
Our failure to comply with the necessary regulatory approval regarding the use of radioactive materials could significantly impair our ability to develop, manufacture and/or sell C-Scan or similar products.
The manufacture of C-Scan requires the use and storage of radioactive materials. In order to use such materials in the development and manufacture of C-Scan in Israel, we are required to obtain a permit from the Israeli Commissioner for Environmental Radiation, or the Commissioner, pursuant to the Israeli Pharmaceutical Regulations (Radioactive Elements and By-Products), 5740-1980. Should we fail to comply with the conditions of our currently existing permit, the Commissioner would have authority to cancel our permit. Should the Commissioner determine that our activities or facilities, or the activities or facilities adjacent to our premises, constitute a danger to the health and well-being of a person, the public or the environment, the cancellation or suspension of our permit could be immediate and without prior notice. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee the annual renewal of our permit and/or annual renewal subject to identical conditions, as the approval of an annual application and the conditions thereof are at the discretion of the Commissioner. Similar requirements and regulations may apply to the manufacture of C-Scan or similar products in other countries. Cancellation of or failure to renew our permit could have materially adverse consequences on our ability to manufacture and sell our products and therefore on our ability to continue our business and operations.
Our ability to source and distribute our products profitably or at all could be harmed if new trade restrictions are imposed or existing trade restrictions become more burdensome.
There have been significant changes and proposed changes in recent years to U.S. trade policies, tariffs and treaties affecting imports. The Trump administration has announced additional tariffs on imports from a number of countries. Such tariffs and any further legislation or actions taken by the U.S. or other countries that restrict trade, such as additional tariffs, trade barriers, tax policies related to international commerce, export controls, sanctions and investment restrictions, renegotiation of existing trade agreements with U.S. trading partners, and other protectionist or retaliatory measures taken by such governments, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any forms of duties or tariffs are imposed on our products, we may be required to charge higher prices in the United States than we expect, which may result in fewer customers and harm our operating performance. Alternatively, we or our contractors may seek manufacturers and/or suppliers in countries not affected, or less affected by the tariffs, resulting in significant costs and disruption to our operations and business. Our business could also be impacted by retaliatory trade measures taken by other countries in response to existing or future tariffs, causing us to raise prices or make changes to our operations, any of which could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and other countries may also disrupt global supply chains or result in significant price increases. The imposition of tariffs or other similar trade restrictions may also be inflationary, which could cause the cost of inputs to increase. Volatile trade relations have also caused and may continue to cause significant volatility in the global financial markets. Further, political tensions as a result of trade policies could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange, and other economic activities between major international economies, resulting in a material adverse effect on global economic conditions. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
30
Risks Related to Our Legacy Intellectual Property
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed.
Our success and ability to compete depends in large part upon our ability to protect our intellectual property. Although we have patents issued in Israel, Europe, United States, Japan, China, India, Hong Kong, Canada, South Korea, Brazil and Australia, we continue to file and prosecute in many of the same countries and additional countries. We face several risks and uncertainties in connection with our intellectual property rights, including, among others:
| ● | pending and future patent applications may not result in the issuance of patents or, if issued, may not be issued in a form that will be advantageous to us; |
| ● | our issued patents may be challenged, invalidated or legally circumvented by third parties; |
| ● | our patents may not be upheld as valid and enforceable or prevent the development of competitive products; |
| ● | the eligibility of certain inventions related to diagnostic medicine, more specifically diagnostic methods and processes, for patent protection in the United States has been limited recently which may affect our ability to enforce our issued patents in the United States or may make it difficult to obtain broad patent protection going forward in the United States; |
| ● | the eligibility to protect methods for treating humans, which is available in the US, is generally not available in other countries, for example in Europe; |
| ● | for a variety of reasons, we may decide not to file for patent protection on various improvements or additional features; and |
| ● | intellectual property protection and/or enforcement may be unavailable or limited in some countries where laws or law enforcement practices may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, the European Union, Canada or Israel. |
Consequently, our competitors could develop, manufacture and sell products that directly compete with our products, which could decrease our sales and diminish our ability to compete. In addition, competitors could attempt to develop their own competitive technologies that fall outside of our intellectual property rights. If our intellectual property does not adequately protect us from our competitors’ products and methods, our competitive position could be materially adversely affected.
Because the medical device industry is litigious, we are susceptible to intellectual property suits that could cause us to incur substantial costs or pay substantial damages or prohibit us from selling C-Scan or any similar products we may develop.
There is a substantial amount of litigation over patent and other intellectual property rights in the medical device industry. Whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Searches typically performed to identify potentially infringed patents of third parties are often not conclusive and because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be applications now pending, which may later result in issued patents which our current or future products may infringe. In addition, our competitors or other parties may assert that C-Scan or any similar products we may develop and the methods they employ may be covered by patents held by them. If C-Scan, any similar products we may develop or any of their components infringes a valid patent, we could be prevented from manufacturing or selling it unless we can obtain a license or redesign the product to avoid infringement. Third parties may currently have, or may eventually be issued, patents on which our current or future products or technologies may infringe.
31
In addition, litigation in which we are accused of infringement may cause negative publicity, adversely impact prospective customers, cause product shipment delays, prohibit us from manufacturing, marketing or selling our current or future products, require us to develop non-infringing technology, make substantial payments to third parties or enter into royalty or license agreements, which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If a successful claim of infringement were made against us and we could not develop non-infringing technology or license the infringed or similar technology in a timely and cost-effective manner, our ability to generate significant revenues may be substantially harmed and we could be exposed to significant liability. A court could enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily or permanently enjoin us, our suppliers, distributors or our customers from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing our current or future products, or could enter an order mandating that we undertake certain remedial activities. Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties can have a similar negative impact on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.
We may also become involved in litigation in connection with our brand name rights. We do not know whether others will assert that our brand name infringes their trademark rights. In addition, names we choose for our products may be claimed to infringe names held by others. If we have to change the names we use, we may experience a loss in goodwill associated with our brand name, customer confusion and a loss of sales. Infringement and other intellectual property claims, with or without merit, can be expensive and time-consuming to litigate and could divert our management’s attention from operating our business.
The steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the market.
In addition to patents, we rely on confidentiality, non-compete, non-disclosure and assignment of inventions provisions, as appropriate, with our employees, consultants, subcontractors, suppliers and clinical investigators to protect and otherwise seek to control access to, and distribution of, our proprietary information. These measures may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property from unauthorized disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation, for the following reasons:
| ● | the agreements may be breached, may not provide the scope of protection we believe they provide or may be determined to be unenforceable, in part or in whole; |
| ● | we may have inadequate remedies for any breach; |
| ● | proprietary information could be disclosed to our competitors; or |
| ● | others may independently develop substantially equivalent or superior proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose such technologies. |
If, for any of the above reasons, our intellectual property is disclosed or misappropriated, it could harm our ability to protect our rights and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
32
Furthermore, although our employees and consultants have agreed to assign to us all rights to any intellectual property created in the scope of their employment or engagement with us and most of our current employees and consultants, have agreed to waive their economic rights with respect to our intellectual property, we cannot assure you that such claims will not be brought against us by current or former employees or consultants, despite their contractual representations and obligations toward us, or by any of the medical and/or governmental institutions that employ or engage such consultants, claiming alleged rights to our intellectual property or demanding remuneration in consideration for assigned intellectual property rights, which could result in litigation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Operations in Israel - We may become subject to claims for payment of compensation for assigned service inventions by our current or former employees, which could result in litigation and adversely affect our business.”
Third parties may challenge the validity of our issued patents or challenge patent applications in administrative proceedings before various patent offices which, if successful, could negatively affect our future business and financial performance.
Various patent offices, including in the United States and Europe, provide administrative proceedings by which a third party can challenge the validity of an issued patent or challenge an application that is being examined absent any threat of litigation. In some instances, including in the United States, the administrative proceedings provide a more efficient and favorable forum to challenge our patents which may lead to more opportunities for competitors to do so, particularly smaller competitors with limited resources. Moreover, the standards utilized in these administrative proceedings, at least in the United States, provide certain legal advantages versus challenging the validity of a patent in a district court. If a third party is successful in one of these administrative proceedings, the patent will no longer be enforceable in the corresponding jurisdiction. In addition, we did not renew certain patents in pursuit of strategic options. With this loss in patent rights, we will not be able to prevent third parties from offering identical or similar competing products which may result in lower profits and a less substantial market share.
We may need to initiate lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, which could be expensive and, if we lose, could cause us to lose some of our intellectual property rights, which would harm our ability to compete in the market.
We rely on patents to protect a portion of our intellectual property and our competitive position. Patent law relating to the scope of claims in the technology fields in which we operate is still evolving and, consequently, patent positions in the medical device industry are generally uncertain. In order to protect or enforce our patent rights, we may initiate patent and related litigation against third parties, such as infringement suits or interference proceedings. Any lawsuits that we initiate could be expensive, take significant time and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns and the outcome of litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights in patents, copyrights, trade secrets or trademarks is highly unpredictable. Litigation also puts our patents and other registered intellectual property at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not being issued. In addition, we may provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, including attorney fees, if any, may not be commercially valuable. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors; however, if a third party is entitled to use our trademark, we could be forced to rebrand, which could result in loss of brand recognition and our ability to distinguish our products may be impaired, which could adversely affect our business.
We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors. In jurisdictions where we have not registered our trademarks and logos and are using them, and as permitted by applicable local law, we rely on common law trademark protection. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks, and may be able to use our trademarks in jurisdictions where they are not registered or otherwise protected by law. If our trademarks are successfully challenged or if a third party is using confusingly similar or identical trademarks in particular jurisdictions before we do, we may be prevented from using our brands and/or domain names and/or could be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote additional resources to marketing new brands. If others are able to use our trademarks, our ability to distinguish our products may be impaired, which could adversely affect our business. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.
33
We may not be able to enforce covenants not to compete at all or, we may be unable to enforce them for the duration contemplated in our employment contracts and may, therefore, be unable to prevent competitors from benefiting from the expertise of some of our former employees involved in research and development activities.
We historically have entered into non-compete agreements that prohibit our employees, if they cease working for us, from directly competing with us or working for our competitors for a limited period of time following termination of employment. In many jurisdictions, courts are increasingly refusing to enforce restrictions on competition by former employees or have interpreted them narrowly. For example, in Israel, where currently all of our employees reside, courts have required employers seeking to enforce non-compete undertakings of a former employee to demonstrate that the competitive activities of the former employee will harm one of a limited number of material interests of the employer which have been recognized by the courts, such as the secrecy of a company’s confidential commercial information or its intellectual property. If we cannot demonstrate that harm would be caused to us, an Israeli court may refuse to enforce our non-compete restrictions or reduce the contemplated period of non- competition such that we may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of our former employees. A growing number of states in the U.S. have refused to enforce non-compete provisions in employment contracts and the federal government has recently done the same. While employees may compete against us, they cannot use our trade secrets and other confidential information. If that were to occur, we would have to prove such activities. Intellectual property litigation is expensive, diverts management time and the results are uncertain.
Risks Related to Our Operations in Israel
Our principal offices, research and development facilities, our manufacturing sites and some of our suppliers are located in Israel and, therefore, our business, financial condition and results of operation may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel.
Our principal offices are located in Israel. In addition, all of our employees are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel may directly affect our business. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its neighboring countries. Although Israel has entered into various agreements with Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority, there has been an increase in unrest and terrorist activity, which began in September 2000 and continued with varying levels of severity throughout 2025. Following the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas terrorists in Israel’s southern border, Israel declared war against Hamas and since then, Israel has been involved in military conflicts with Hamas, Hezbollah, a terrorist organization based in Lebanon, Syria and Iran, both directly and through proxies. Although a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas took effect on October 10, 2025, there is no assurance that this agreement will continue to be upheld. On February 28, 2026 the U.S. and Israel initiated air strikes against Iranian military targets and leadership. Since then, retaliation by Iran against U.S. and Israeli interests in the Middle East has been widespread. As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, military activity and hostilities continue to escalate in the Middle East, and the situation throughout the region remains volatile, with the potential for continued escalation into a broader and more sustained regional conflict.
To date, none of our facilities or infrastructure, including our technology platform and IT system, have been damaged nor have our supply chains been significantly impacted since the war broke out. However, a prolonged war could adversely impact our supply chain and our ability to ship products from Israel, which could disrupt our operations. Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with war and terrorism, and the war and terrorism insurance we maintain may not be adequate to cover any losses we may incur associated with armed conflicts and terrorist attacks. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained or that it will sufficiently cover our potential damages. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In the past, the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to economic boycotts. Several countries still restrict business with the State of Israel and with Israeli companies. These restrictive laws and policies may have an adverse impact on our operating results, financial condition or the expansion of our business. A campaign of boycotts, divestment and sanctions has been undertaken against Israel, which could also adversely impact our business. Parties with whom we may do business could decline to travel to Israel during periods of heightened unrest or tension. In addition, the political and security situation in Israel may result in parties with whom we may have agreements involving performance in Israel claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions in such agreements. In addition, any hostilities involving Israel could have a material adverse effect on our facilities including our corporate office or on the facilities of our local suppliers, in which event all or a portion of our inventory may be damaged, and our ability to deliver products to customers could be materially adversely affected.
34
In addition, our operations could also be disrupted by the obligations of personnel to perform military service. All our employees and independent contractors are based in Israel. Some of our personnel in Israel may be obligated to perform annual military reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces, depending on their age and position in the army. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence of one or more of our executive officers or key employees for a significant period due to military service and any significant disruption in our operations could harm our business. The full impact on our workforce or business if some of our executive officers and employees are called upon to perform military service, especially in times of national emergency, is difficult to predict. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence of a significant number of employees related to military service, which could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Any hostilities involving Israel, terrorist activities or political instability in the region or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners, or significant downturns in the economic or financial condition of Israel, could adversely affect our operations and product development, cause our revenues to decrease and adversely affect our share price.
Furthermore, the Israeli government has pursued, and continues to debate, significant changes to Israel’s judicial system. While the scope and timing of these measures have evolved over time, and certain initiatives have been delayed, modified or suspended, the underlying issues remain a source of political division and public controversy. In response to these developments, individuals, organizations and institutions, both within and outside of Israel, have expressed concerns that actual or proposed changes to the judicial framework could negatively affect Israel’s business environment, including through reduced willingness of foreign investors to invest or conduct business in Israel, increased currency volatility, adverse actions or outlooks by credit rating agencies, higher interest rates, increased volatility in securities markets, and other adverse macroeconomic effects. These developments could also adversely affect the Israeli labor market or contribute to political instability or civil unrest. To the extent that any of these factors persist or intensify, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms, or at all.
Pursuant to the terms of the Israeli government grants we received for research and development expenditures, we are obligated to pay certain royalties on our revenues to the Israeli government. In addition, the terms of Israeli government grant we received require us to satisfy specified conditions and to make additional payments in addition to repayment of the grants upon certain events.
Our research and development efforts have been financed, in part, through funding from the IIA and the BIRD Foundation. We have received grants from the Government of the State of Israel through the IIA (formerly the OCS) for the financing of a portion of (i) our research and development expenditures and (ii) a portion of the development of our manufacturing line, pursuant to the Innovation Law and related regulations and guidelines. As of December 31, 2025, we had received funding from the IIA and the BIRD Foundation in the total amount of approximately $5.6 million and $0.11 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, we had not paid any royalties to the IIA and had a contingent obligation to the IIA with respect to such funding in the amount of approximately $6.2 million. In addition, in January 2021, we received an IIA grant approval to support the funding of our transition from research and development to manufacturing. The final IIA grant amounted to $620,000 (NIS 2.25 million) (along with a co-investment by us of the same amount), which we are not required to repay to the IIA, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the grant approval, of which we received approximately $0 (NIS 0) in 2025 and 2024, and $225,000 (NIS 816,075) in February 2023. We may apply for additional IIA grants in the future; however, there is no assurance that such applications will be approved in the amount requested or at all. Furthermore, the funds available for IIA grants out of the annual budget of the State of Israel have been reduced in the past and may be further reduced in the future. We cannot predict whether we will be entitled to any future grants, or the amounts of any such grants.
35
Under the terms of the Innovation Law as currently in effect, products developed with IIA funding are required to be manufactured in Israel, unless the IIA approved grant program includes a pre-determined portion of manufacturing that may be performed outside Israel (as certain of our IIA approved grants included). The approval of the IIA is required for the transferring of manufacturing outside Israel in excess of such pre-determined portion (however, only a notice to the IIA, as opposed to approval, is required for the transfer outside Israel of up to 10% of the cumulative manufacturing in excess of such pre-approved portion). If manufacturing of IIA-funded products is transferred outside Israel (following IIA approval) in excess of the pre-determined percentage included in the grant approval, then the royalty repayment rate will be increased by 1% with respect to the additional approved percentage to be manufactured outside Israel and the royalty repayment for the entire approved program may be increased to up to three times the amount of the grants received, depending on the percentage manufactured outside Israel (plus accrued interest). We may explore from time to time whether certain other components of C-Scan can be assembled outside of Israel. For example, we may in the future explore whether it would be possible to assemble the capsule without the X-ray source in Israel and have the X-ray source subsequently manufactured and assembled into C-Scan at a certified radioisotope production facility or at a distribution center outside Israel.
Over the years, we received approval of grant applications that included a certain predetermined percentage of manufacturing to be performed outside of Israel of the X-ray source but additional examination of these approvals and consequent manufacturing is required to determine liabilities to the IIA, if any. IIA prior approval is also required for the transfer of IIA-funded know-how to a third party outside of Israel (including by way of license), which we may not receive (and any such approval would typically be subject to payment of a redemption fee, calculated according to a formula under the Innovation Law, which may be in the amount of up to six times the amount of the grants received less paid royalties, if any, and depreciation, but no less than the total grants received), plus accrued interest. Even following the full repayment of any IIA grants, we must nevertheless continue to comply with the requirements of the Innovation Law and related regulations and guidelines. The foregoing restrictions and requirements for payment may impair our ability to sell our technology assets outside of Israel or to outsource or transfer development or manufacturing activities with respect to any product or technology outside of Israel. Furthermore, the consideration available to our shareholders in a transaction involving the transfer outside of Israel of technology or know-how developed with IIA funding (such as a merger or similar transaction) may be reduced by any amounts that we are required to pay to the IIA.
If we fail to comply with any of the conditions and restrictions imposed by the Innovation Law and related regulations and guidelines, or by the specific terms under which we received the grants, we may be required to refund any grants previously received together with interest and penalties, and, in certain circumstances, may be subject to criminal charges.
Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder are governed by Israeli law, which differ in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies.
The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our amended articles of association and by Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in U.S. based corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith and in a customary manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations towards the company and other shareholders, and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at a general meeting of shareholders on matters such as amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and certain related party transactions requiring shareholder approval under Israeli law. In addition, a controlling shareholder of an Israeli company or a shareholder who is aware that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or executive officer in the company or has other powers towards the company, has a duty of fairness toward the company. There is limited case law available to assist us in understanding the nature of this duty or the implications of these provisions. These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.
36
It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of a U.S. court against us, certain of our officers and directors or the Israeli experts named in this Annual Report in Israel or the United States, to assert U.S. securities laws claims in Israel or to serve process on certain of our officers and directors and these experts.
We are incorporated in Israel. A majority of our executive officers and directors are not residents of the United States, and a substantial portion of our assets are located outside the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us, or any of these persons, including a judgment based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult for you to effect service of process on these persons in the United States or to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws on the grounds that Israel is not the most appropriate forum in which to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proven as a fact by expert witnesses, which can be a time consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel that addresses the matters described above. As a result of the difficulty associated with enforcing a judgment against us in Israel, you may not be able to collect any damages awarded by either a U.S. or foreign court.
Provisions of Israeli law and our amended articles of association may delay, prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, us, even when the terms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders.
Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to such types of transactions. For example, a full tender offer for all of a public company’s issued and outstanding shares can only be completed if the acquirer receives positive responses from the holders of at least 95% of the issued share capital and the approval of a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in the tender offer, unless at least 98% of the company’s outstanding shares are tendered. Furthermore, the shareholders, including those who indicated their acceptance of the tender offer (unless the acquirer stipulated in its tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek appraisal rights), may, at any time within six months following the completion of the tender offer, petition an Israeli court for an appraisal right, to alter the consideration for the acquisition. In addition, a statutory merger may not be consummated unless at least 50 days have passed from the date on which a proposal for approval of the merger was filed by each party with the Israeli Registrar of Companies and at least 30 days have passed from the date on which the merger was approved by the shareholders of each party.
We may become subject to claims for payment of compensation for assigned service inventions by our current or former employees, which could result in litigation and adversely affect our business.
Under the Israeli Patents Law, 5727-1967, or the Patents Law, inventions conceived by an employee during the scope of his or her employment are regarded as “service inventions” and are owned by the employer, absent a specific agreement between the employee and employer giving the employee service invention rights. Section 134 of the Patents Law provides that if no agreement between an employer and an employee exists that prescribes whether, to what extent, and on what conditions the employee is entitled to remuneration for his or her service inventions, then such matters may, upon application by the employee, be decided by a government-appointed compensation and royalties committee established under the Patents Law, or the Committee. Although our employees have agreed to assign to us all rights to any intellectual property created in the scope of their employment and most of our current employees, including all those involved in the development of our intellectual property, have agreed to waive their economic rights with respect to service inventions, we cannot assure you that claims will not be brought against us by current or former employees demanding remuneration in consideration for assigned service inventions. If any such claims were filed, we could potentially be required to pay remuneration to our current or former employees for such assigned service inventions, or be forced to litigate such claims, which could negatively affect our business.
37
Risks Related to Ownership of our Ordinary Shares
We incur and will continue to incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company in the United States, and our management is required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives.
As a public company whose securities are traded in the United States, we incur and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules and regulations implemented by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq, impose various requirements on public companies, including requiring the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls. Our management and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Changes in the laws, rules and regulations affecting public companies would result in increased costs to us as we respond to their requirements. These rules and regulations could make it more difficult or more expensive for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantial costs to obtain or maintain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, our Board committees or as executive officers. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur in order to comply with such requirements.
If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, the price of our ordinary shares may be adversely affected.
Our internal control over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions that could require correction or remediation, the disclosure of which may have an adverse impact on the price of our ordinary shares. We are required to establish and maintain appropriate internal control over financial reporting. Failure to establish those controls, or any failure of those controls once established, could adversely affect our public disclosures regarding our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors. In addition, as a “non-accelerated filer,” we are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Decreased disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status as a “non-accelerated filer” may make it harder for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects and may make our ordinary shares a less attractive investment. Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure of management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the price of our ordinary shares.
We may be unable to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, which could result in the delisting of our ordinary shares from the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Nasdaq has established certain standards for the continued listing of a security on Nasdaq. On September 3, 2025, we received a deficiency letter from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department notifying us that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), which requires us to maintain a minimum of $2,500,000 in shareholders’ equity. The letter further stated that we had 45 calendar days, or by October 20, 2025, to submit a plan to regain compliance with respect to the deficiency identified in the letter. We submitted the plan on October 20, 2025. On January 30, 2026, we announced that we had regained compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum shareholders’ equity requirement; however, such compliance is conditional on our ability to maintain compliance on an ongoing basis. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements in the future. If we are delisted from Nasdaq, our ordinary shares may be eligible for trading on an over-the-counter market in the United States. In the event that we are not able to obtain a listing on another U.S. stock exchange or quotation service for our ordinary shares, it may be extremely difficult or impossible for shareholders to sell their ordinary shares in the United States. Moreover, if we are delisted from Nasdaq, but obtain a substitute listing for our ordinary shares in the United States, it will likely be on a market with less liquidity, and therefore, experience potentially more price volatility than experienced on Nasdaq. Shareholders may not be able to sell their ordinary shares on any such substitute U.S. market in the quantities, at the times, or at the prices that could potentially be available on a more liquid trading market. As a result of these factors, if our ordinary shares are delisted from Nasdaq, the price of our ordinary shares is likely to decline. A delisting of our ordinary shares from Nasdaq could also adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for our operations and/or result in a loss of confidence by investors, or employees.
38
We are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, we are not subject to U.S. proxy rules and are subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reporting obligations that, to some extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those applicable to a U.S. issuer.
We report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act as a foreign private issuer. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. public companies, including (i) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; (ii) the liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and (iii) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information, or current reports on Form 8-K, upon the occurrence of specified significant events. We intend to furnish quarterly reports to the SEC on Form 6-K for so long as we are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(g) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, although the information we furnish may not be the same as the information that is required in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for U.S. domestic issuers. In addition, while U.S. domestic issuers that are not large-accelerated filers or accelerated filers are required to file their annual reports on Form 10-K within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, foreign private issuers are not required to file their annual report on Form 20-F until 120 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from the Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure), aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information. Although we intend to make interim reports available to our shareholders in a timely manner, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are not foreign private issuers.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted, to follow, and follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of otherwise applicable Nasdaq requirements, which may result in less protection than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic U.S. issuers.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those otherwise required under the listing rules of the Nasdaq for domestic U.S. issuers. For instance, we follow home country practice in Israel with regard to, among other things, director nomination procedures, the approval of compensation of officers and quorum requirements at general meetings of our shareholders. In addition, we follow our home country law instead of the listing rules of the Nasdaq that require us to obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as the establishment or amendment of certain equity based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the Company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or greater interest in the Company, and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company. Following our home country governance practices as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a United States company listed on Nasdaq may provide less protection to you than what is accorded to investors under the listing rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market applicable to domestic U.S. issuers.
If we lose our status as a foreign private issuer under the SEC’s rules, our compliance costs will increase.
We would lose our foreign private issuer status if more than 50 percent of our outstanding voting securities are directly or indirectly held of record by residents of the United States and if a majority of our directors or executive officers are U.S. citizens or residents and we fail to meet additional requirements necessary to avoid loss of foreign private issuer status. Although we have elected to comply with certain U.S. regulatory provisions, our loss of foreign private issuer status would make such provisions mandatory. The regulatory and compliance costs for us under U.S. securities laws as a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher. If we are not a foreign private issuer, we will be required to file periodic reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer. We would also be required to follow U.S. proxy disclosure requirements, including the requirement to disclose more detailed information about the compensation of our senior executive officers on an individual basis. We may also be required to modify certain of our policies to comply with corporate governance practices associated with U.S. domestic issuers. Such conversion and modifications will involve additional costs. In addition, we may lose our ability to rely upon exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements on U.S. stock exchanges that are available to foreign private issuers.
39
Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the NIS and the Euro and inflation may negatively affect our earnings and we may not be able to hedge our currency exchange risks successfully.
The dollar is our functional and reporting currency. However, a significant portion of our operating expenses, including personnel and facilities related expenses, are incurred in NIS. As a result, we are exposed to the risks that the NIS may appreciate relative to the U.S. dollar, or, if the NIS instead depreciates relative to the U.S. dollar, that the inflation rate in Israel may exceed such rate of depreciation of the NIS, or that the timing of such depreciation may lag behind inflation in Israel. In any such event, the dollar cost of our operations in Israel would increase and our dollar- denominated results of operations would be adversely affected. In 2025, the NIS appreciated by approximately 12.5% relative to the U.S. dollar, compared to a depreciation of 0.80% in 2024, a depreciation of 3.07% in 2023, and a depreciation of 13.2% in 2022. The rate of inflation in Israel was 2.6% in 2025, compared to 3.2% in 2024, and 4.2% and 5.3% in 2023 and 2022, respectively. Although we do not expect such appreciation and inflation to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition into fiscal 2026, we cannot predict any future trends in the rate of inflation in Israel or whether the NIS will appreciate or depreciate against the U.S. dollar. In addition, we may incur operating expenses denominated in Euros, and therefore, our operating results may also be subject to fluctuations due to changes in the U.S. dollar/Euro exchange rate. We cannot predict any future trends in the rate of inflation in Israel or the rate of devaluation (if any) of the NIS, the Euro and other foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. Although we engage in currency hedging arrangements from time to time, these measures may not adequately protect us from fluctuations in the exchange rates of the NIS, the Euro and other foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar (and/or from inflation of such foreign currencies) and involve costs and risk of their own.
We have never declared or paid a dividend and currently do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our securities.
We have never declared and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. Our Board of Directors has discretion to declare and pay dividends on our ordinary shares and will make any determination to do so based on a number of factors, such as our operating results, financial condition, current and anticipated cash needs and other business and economic factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, we are only permitted to pay dividends out of “profits” (as defined by the Israeli Companies Law, 1999, or the Israeli Companies Law), provided that there is no reasonable concern that the dividend distribution will prevent us from meeting our existing and foreseeable obligations, as they become due. If we do not pay dividends, our ordinary shares may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if the trading price of our securities appreciates. Further, you should not rely on an investment in us if you require dividend income from your investments.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about us or our business or publish unfavorable research about us or our business, the price of our securities and their trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our securities will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Management is not aware of any research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our securities, the price of our securities would likely decline. We do not have control over these analysts, and we do not have commitments from them to continue to write research reports about us or our business. The price of our ordinary shares could decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade our ordinary shares or if those analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or cease publishing reports about us or our business.
40
Our stock price has and may be subject to fluctuation, and purchasers of our securities could incur substantial losses.
Our stock price has been subject to considerable fluctuation since our initial public offering in February 2015. The stock market in general has experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, investors may not be able to sell their securities at or above the purchase price. The market price for our ordinary shares on Nasdaq may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including, among others:
| ● | we may not be able to complete the development of or redesign our products and technology, or redeploy our technology into other potentially viable products; |
| ● | inability to complete the Merger; |
| ● | inability to obtain the approvals necessary to commence further clinical trials and/or unsatisfactory results of clinical trials; |
| ● | announcements of regulatory approval or the failure to obtain it, or specific label indications or patient populations for its use, or changes or delays in the regulatory review process; |
| ● | any intellectual property infringement actions in which we may become involved; |
| ● | announcements concerning our competitors or the medical device industry in general; |
| ● | achievement of expected product sales and profitability or our failure to meet expectations; |
| ● | our commencement of, or involvement in, litigation; |
| ● | any major changes in our Board of Directors or management; |
| ● | legislation in the United States relating to the sale or pricing of medical device; |
| ● | future substantial sales of our ordinary shares; |
| ● | changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, if our ordinary shares are covered by analysts; |
| ● | the trading volume of our ordinary shares; or |
| ● | natural disasters and political and economic instability, including wars, terrorism, political unrest, results of certain elections and votes, emergence of a pandemic, or other widespread health emergencies (or concerns over the possibility of such an emergency, including for example, the COVID-19 pandemic), boycotts, adoption or expansion of government trade restrictions, and other business restrictions. |
In addition, the stock market in general, and Nasdaq in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of small companies. Broad market and industry factors may negatively affect the market price of our ordinary shares, regardless of our actual operating performance. Further, a systemic decline in the financial markets and related factors beyond our control may cause our share price to decline rapidly and unexpectedly. See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Ownership of our Ordinary Shares - We may be unable to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, which could result in the delisting of our ordinary shares from the Nasdaq Capital Market.”
41
The trading market for our ordinary shares is not always active, liquid and orderly, which may inhibit the ability of our shareholders to sell ordinary shares.
Since our initial public offering in February 2015, the trading market for our ordinary shares has not always been active, liquid or orderly. The lack of an active market at times may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your shares. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares.
We have broad discretion in how we use the net proceeds from our financings, and we may not use these proceeds effectively.
Our management has broad discretion as to the application of the net proceeds of our financings. Our shareholders may not agree with the manner in which our management chooses to allocate and spend the net proceeds. Moreover, our management may use the net proceeds for corporate purposes that may not increase our market value.
Our business, operating results and growth rates may be adversely affected by current or future unfavorable economic and market conditions and adverse developments with respect to financial institutions and associated liquidity risk.
Our business depends on the economic health of the global economies. If the conditions in the global economies remain uncertain or continue to be volatile, or if they deteriorate, including as a result of the impact of military conflict, such as the war between Russia and Ukraine, armed conflict in Israel and Gaza, terrorism or other geopolitical events, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Operations in Israel - Our principal offices, research and development facilities our manufacturing sites and some of our suppliers are located in Israel and, therefore, our business, financial condition and results of operation may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel.” Economic weakness, inflation and increases in interest rates, limited availability of credit, liquidity shortages, trade restrictions and constrained capital spending could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, the military conflict may affect the ability to purchase materials sourced in Russia. For example, one of our suppliers sources the enriched X-ray isotope substance used in C-Scan from Russia. To the extent we continue to use such component in any redesigned or future products, we could experience disruptions in our supply chain in the future if sanctions and export control restrictions on Russian entities and individuals are still imposed, and we may not be able to find alternative sources for such key material in a timely manner.
Increases in inflation raise our costs for commodities, labor, materials and services and other costs required to operate our business, and failure to secure these on reasonable terms may adversely impact our financial condition. Additionally, increases in inflation, geopolitical developments and global supply chain disruptions, have caused, and may in the future cause, global economic uncertainty and uncertainty about the interest rate environment, which may make it more difficult, costly or dilutive for us to secure additional financing. A failure to adequately respond to these risks could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In addition, adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as the closures of SVB and Signature Bank and their placement into receivership with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, other actual events or concerns involving liquidity and defaults or non-performance by financial institutions or transactional counterparties, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
42
Risks Related to Taxation
There is a risk that we could be treated as a domestic (U.S.) corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes by reason of the transactions related to our acquisition of all of the business operations and substantially all of the assets of Check-Cap LLC on May 31, 2009, or the Reorganization.
Section 7874(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, generally provides that a foreign corporation (i.e., a corporation created or organized under the laws of a jurisdiction outside of the United States) would be treated as a domestic (U.S.) corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes if, pursuant to a plan or a series of related transactions, (1) the foreign corporation acquires, directly or indirectly, substantially all of the assets of a domestic corporation (or substantially all of the properties constituting a trade or business of a domestic partnership), (2) after the acquisition, the former shareholders of the acquired corporation by reason of holding shares of the acquired corporation (or, in the case of an acquisition with respect to a domestic partnership, the former partners of the domestic partnership by reason of holding a capital or profits interest in the domestic partnership) own at least 80% of the stock (by vote or value) of the acquiring corporation, and (3) after the acquisition, the expanded affiliated group that includes the acquiring corporation does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which, or under the laws of which, the acquiring corporation is created or organized when compared to the total business activities of such expanded affiliated group. On the basis of analysis of the relevant facts and circumstances and the relevant law (including the temporary regulations under Section 7874 applicable at the time of the Reorganization), it was determined that the third condition described in the preceding sentence was not met with respect to the Reorganization and, therefore, that the inversion tax rules of Section 7874(b) would not apply to treat us as a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, since this determination was made on the basis of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, and it is not clear which facts and circumstances the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, may consider more important than others, this conclusion is not free from doubt.
If Section 7874(b) were to apply to the Reorganization (and we were to be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes), then, among other things, (i) we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our worldwide taxable income (if and when we have taxable income); (ii) certain payments (e.g., interest and dividends) that we make (or have made) to our foreign investors may be (or may have been) subject to U.S. withholding taxes; (iii) we may be subject to significant penalties for the failure to file certain tax returns and reports, including reports with respect to our foreign bank accounts; and (iv) the U.S. unitholders of Check-Cap LLC would not have been subject to U.S. federal income tax on royalties that are deemed to be paid to them under Section 367(d) of the Code as a result of the Reorganization. As discussed under Item 5B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates - Royalties provision - Reimbursement liability to Check-Cap LLC unitholders,” as part of the Reorganization, we committed to reimburse the unitholders of Check-Cap LLC for any tax burdens that may be imposed on them due to the Reorganization, including royalties that are deemed to be paid to the U.S. unitholders under Section 367(d) of the Code.
Prospective investors are urged to consult their own advisors on these issues. The balance of this discussion, including the discussion under Item 10E “Additional Information - Taxation - U.S. Federal Income Taxation,” assumes that we will be and have been treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
We may be eligible for tax benefits from government programs, which require us to meet certain conditions, including regarding the location of our property, plant and equipment and manufacturing in Israel. We can provide no assurance that we would continue to be eligible for such benefits and/or that any such benefits will not be terminated in the future.
Our manufacturing facilities in Israel may qualify as a “Benefited Enterprise” under the Israeli Law for Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959, which would entitle us to receive certain tax benefits. In order to be eligible for such benefits, we would be required to meet certain conditions, including the making of a minimum capital investment in our productive assets and the carrying on of a required portion of our manufacturing in Israel. The amount of the benefit will be determined in accordance with various conditions, including the location of our property, plant and equipment and the location of certain of our sub-contractors. If we cease to meet the required conditions for eligibility, the tax benefits could be cancelled and we could be required to pay increased taxes or to refund the amounts of the benefits received with interest and penalties. We can provide no assurance as to the amount of future capital investment in our productive assets, our future manufacturing location and the future location of our property, plant and equipment and certain of our sub-contractors, and therefore, we cannot provide assurance that we will be eligible for such tax benefits or assurance as to the amount of such tax benefits. Even if we continue to meet the relevant requirements, the tax benefits that Benefited Enterprises receive may not be continued in the future at their current levels or at all. If these tax benefits were reduced or eliminated, the amount of taxes that we would be required to pay would likely increase, as all of our operations would consequently be subject to corporate tax at the standard rate, which could adversely affect our results of operations. See Item 10E “Additional Information-Taxation-Israeli Tax Considerations and Government Programs-Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959” for additional information concerning these tax benefits.
43
There is a risk that we may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors.
In general, we will be treated as a passive foreign investment company, or a PFIC, for any taxable year in which either (1) at least 75% of our gross income (including our pro rata share of the gross income of our 25% or more- owned corporate subsidiaries) is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the average value of our assets (including our pro rata share of the assets of our 25% or more-owned corporate subsidiaries) is attributable to assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents, royalties, and gains from the disposition of passive assets. If we are determined to be a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder (as defined in Item 10E “Additional Information-Taxation-U.S. Federal Income Taxation”) of our securities, the U.S. Holder may be subject to increased U.S. federal income tax liability upon a sale or other disposition of our securities or the receipt of certain excess distributions from us and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. Based on the past and projected composition and classification of our income and assets, we believe that we were a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2025 and may be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2026. Our actual PFIC status for our current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year is uncertain and will not be determinable until after the end of such taxable year. Accordingly, there can be no assurance with respect to our status as a PFIC for our taxable year ending December 31, 2026 or any subsequent taxable year.
U.S. investors are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules. For more information, see Item 10E “Additional Information-Taxation-U.S. Federal Income Taxation-U.S. Holders-Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”
Item 4. Information On Our Company
A. History and Development of the Company Our History
Our legal and commercial name is Check-Cap Ltd. We were formed as a company in Israel on April 5, 2009. On May 31, 2009, we acquired all of the business operations and substantially all of the assets of Check-Cap LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formed in December 2004. On May 15, 2015, we formed our wholly-owned subsidiary Check-Cap US, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
On February 24, 2015, we successfully completed an initial public offering in the United States and the listing of our securities on Nasdaq.
On August 16, 2023, we entered into the Keystone BCA with Keystone, PubCo and other direct, wholly owned subsidiaries of PubCo. At our 2023 annual general meeting of shareholders, such business combination transactions did not receive the requisite majority required for approval under Section 320 of the Israeli Companies Law 5759-1999. On December 24, 2023, we received a notice on behalf of Keystone, terminating the Keystone BCA in light of the results.
On March 25, 2024, we entered into the Apollo BCA. On September 4, 2025, we entered into the Parea APA to acquire certain assets relating to a Ghost Kitchen area representative business. On September 12, 2025, we entered into the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which MBody AI will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Also on September 12, 2025, we entered into the BCA Termination Agreement, pursuant to which the Apollo BCA will terminate upon the closing of the Merger. The Merger was approved by our shareholders on November 14, 2025, and closing is anticipated in the first half of 2026. Upon closing of the Merger, the Company expects to change its name to “MBody AI Ltd.” or a similar name approved by the Israeli Registrar of Companies and continue as a publicly traded company on Nasdaq, with MBody AI’s business comprising its principal operations. At the effective time of the closing of the Merger, the Apollo BCA will be terminated by mutual consent of the parties such that no termination fee will be due to Apollo or the Company, so long as the Company continues to be open to future integration with Apollo. Upon the closing of the Merger, the loans made by the Company to Apollo that are currently outstanding will be converted into a 7.5% equity position in Apollo that will be owned by the Company, and each of the related loan agreements between the Company and Apollo will be cancelled for no further consideration
44
See “— Evaluation and Pursuit of Strategic Options” below for further details regarding the Apollo BCA, the Merger Agreement, the Parea APA and the ARC ELOC Facility.
We are subject to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law. Our principal executive offices are located at Check-Cap Building, 29 Abba Hushi Avenue, P.O. Box 1271, Isfiya, 3009000, Israel. Our telephone number is +972-4-8303400 and our website is located at www.check-cap.com (the information contained therein or linked thereto shall not be considered incorporated by reference in this Annual Report). Our U.S. agent is Puglisi & Associates, located at 850 Library Avenue, Suite 204, Newark, Delaware 19711.
We use our website (http://www.check-cap.com) as a channel of distribution of company information. The information we post through this channel may be deemed material. Accordingly, investors should monitor our website, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. The contents of our website are not, however, a part of this Annual Report. Our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) are available to you on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding us that we have filed electronically with the SEC. The information on our website is not part of this annual report and is not incorporated by reference herein. Further, references to website URLs are intended to be inactive textual references only.
Principal Capital Expenditures
For a discussion of our capital expenditures, see Item 5 “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
B. Business
Overview of Our Company
Historical Operations
We are a clinical stage medical diagnostics company aiming to redefine CRC screening through the introduction of C-Scan®, a screening test designed to detect polyps before they may transform into cancer to enable early intervention and cancer prevention.
The disruptive capsule-based screening technology aims to increase screening adherence worldwide and enable people to stay healthy. The system utilizes ultra-low-dose X- rays to scan the inner lining of the colon for precancerous polyps, and other structural abnormalities. CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer, with more than 1.9 million new cases identified every year globally. It can take up to 10 years before a pre-cancerous polyp develops into invasive cancer. As such, there is a crucial detection window for the prevention of colorectal cancer, through the detection of these benign polyps. While routine screening is recommended by The American Cancer Society for healthy people aged 45 years and older, screening adherence remains low. Currently, colonoscopy is the gold standard for the detection of colorectal polyps, but about 1 in 3 adults among the targeted screening population avoids having a colonoscopy in the U.S., and adherence in other regions of the world such as Europe and Asia is even lower, due to the invasiveness of the procedure and bowel preparation. Most patient-friendly CRC screening tests currently available, or poised to enter the market, such as fecal or liquid biopsy tests, are primarily designed to detect cancer and demonstrate low sensitivity in detecting pre-cancerous polyps. As such, they do not necessarily provide patients with the time window to pre-empt the disease. C-Scan is non-invasive and requires no bowel cleansing or sedation, allowing the patients to continue their daily routine with no interruption as the capsule is propelled through the gastrointestinal tract by natural motility. C-Scan is comprised of three main components: (1) C-Scan Cap, an ingestible X-ray scanning capsule; (2) C-Scan Track, three miniaturized patches worn on the patient’s back for integrated positioning, control and data recording; and (3) C-Scan View, a proprietary software to process and represent 2D and 3D maps of the inner surface of the colon. We believe that this solution has the potential to become an alternative for both physicians and patients and to increase the number of people completing CRC screening.
45
Our C-Scan Cap is swallowed and propelled by natural motility through the gastrointestinal tract and excreted naturally with no need for retrieval for data collection (currently, during clinical trials in the U.S., the C-Scan capsule is not intended to be disposed of in the sanitary sewer system, and is therefore collected by the patient, and returned to the medical facility administering the device for further decay and disposal). Unlike other existing CRC screening methods, this process should not disrupt a patient’s normal activities or require fasting. Our C-Scan Cap employs ultra-low-dose X-rays, which allow the C-Scan system to scan the interior lining of the colon even when surrounded by intestinal content. As such, we believe that patients using C-Scan will not be required to undergo any prior bowel cleansing.
Our C-Scan Cap is being designed to transmit position, motility and the data it collects to the C-Scan Track that will be attached to the patient’s back. The external data recorder is being designed to enable the download of the data to our C-Scan View application to allow physicians to analyze the data collected by our C-Scan Cap. The C-Scan Track is being designed to provide the physician with localization data to yield a reconstructed image intended to enable physicians to review the colon’s inner structural information.
Colonic polyps are tissue growths that occur on the lining of the colon. Polyps in the colon are common, and certain types of polyps may become cancerous over time. In the event that polyps are identified by C-Scan, the patient may be advised to undergo a subsequent traditional colonoscopy procedure to examine, remove and biopsy the polyps. For those patients who require a subsequent colonoscopy, concerns regarding pain, discomfort and embarrassment may still remain. We do not, however, believe that these concerns will make the use of C-Scan any less attractive to physicians and patients. Although patients who are initially screened utilizing a traditional colonoscopy could avoid the need for a second colonoscopy if polyps are discovered, we believe that C-Scan will still be attractive option for physicians and patients who object to or cannot undergo a colonoscopy in the first instance, as we believe a large number of these patients if screened will not require a subsequent colonoscopy and those found with suspicious findings, will likely agree to undergo colonoscopy.
We initiated our first clinical studies in 2010, consisting of two single-center feasibility studies with non-scanning (no X-ray source) capsules for the purposes of measuring gastrointestinal tract activity, colon contractions and associated capsule motility, and shortening capsule transit time.
On June 6, 2023, we announced that after further review of additional data and interaction with the FDA on a revised pivotal study protocol together with the anticipated time and investment necessary to further develop the technology, we were reducing our workforce significantly to reduce cash burn, concentrating our resources on essential research activities, discontinuing our calibration studies, and evaluating and pursuing strategic options. We have discontinued development of our C-Scan technology and do not currently have any manufacturing capabilities. Our current operations are focused on evaluating and pursuing strategic options and maintaining the inventory we manufactured prior to our change in strategic priority.
Since our formation, we have not generated any significant revenue. We do not anticipate generating any significant revenue for the foreseeable future and we do not yet have any specific launch dates for our product. We incurred net income of $4.1 million in 2025, and net losses of $25.1 million in 2024, and $17.6 million in 2023, respectively. We expect that we will continue to generate losses from our operations for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $165.9 million and a total shareholders’ equity of $3.4 million. We have funded our operations to date primarily through equity financings, sales of ordinary shares and warrants, the exercise of warrants and other funding transactions and through grants from the IIA.
Evaluation and Pursuit of Strategic Options
As a result of our evaluation and pursuit of strategic options, on August 16, 2023, we entered into the Keystone BCA with Keystone, PubCo and other direct, wholly owned subsidiaries of PubCo. At our 2023 annual general meeting of shareholders, such business combination transactions did not receive the requisite majority required for approval under Section 320 of the Israeli Companies Law 5759-1999. On December 24, 2023, we received a notice on behalf of Keystone, terminating the Keystone BCA in light of the results.
46
On March 25, 2024, we entered into the Apollo BCA. In May 2024, we reimbursed Apollo $3,808,815 pursuant to the provisions of the Apollo BCA. On September 8, 2024, our Board of Directors approved and ratified a Loan Agreement (the “September 2024 Loan Agreement”) with Apollo. Pursuant to the September 2024 Loan Agreement, we agreed to provide Apollo a loan in the principal amount of US$6.0 million. The principal outstanding under the loan will bear interest at 5% per annum, both before and after demand, default, and judgment, and will be payable annually in arrears. The aggregate amount of the loan and any accrued and unpaid interest thereon will be due and be paid on the date that is 30 days following the date the Apollo BCA is terminated, or the Check-Cap/Apollo Business Combination is consummated.
In addition, on September 8, 2024, our Board of Directors approved and ratified an amending letter (the “Amending Letter”) with Apollo. The Amending Letter amends the Apollo BCA and obligates Check-Cap to deposit US$11.0 million into a designated, segregated and interest-bearing bank account. Funds deposited into this account may be disbursed upon the mutual written agreement of the designated representatives of Apollo and Check-Cap (being their respective board chairs) in order to fund the pursuit of accretive acquisition targets or other growth initiatives of Apollo and for no other purpose. Any funds so disbursed will reduce the Net Cash Target (as defined in the Apollo BCA) on a dollar-for-dollar basis. In the event that the Apollo BCA is terminated, then, subject to the payment of any termination fees triggered by Section 9.3(c) of the Apollo BCA, funds remaining in the segregated account upon termination, together with interest earned thereon, will accrue to and will be for the account and benefit of Check-Cap.
On December 23, 2024, our Board of Directors approved a Loan Agreement (the “December 2024 Loan Agreement”) with Apollo. Pursuant to the December 2024 Loan Agreement, the Company agreed to provide Apollo a loan in the principal amount of US$6.0 million. The principal outstanding under the loan will bear interest at 5% per annum, both before and after demand, default, and judgment, and will be payable annually in arrears. The aggregate amount of the loan and any accrued and unpaid interest thereon will be due and be paid on the date that is 30 days following the date the Apollo BCA is terminated, or the Check-Cap/Apollo Business Combination is consummated.
The US$6.0 million loan will be funded from the previously created designated, segregated and interest-bearing bank account. Funds deposited into the Segregated Account may be disbursed upon the mutual written agreement of the designated representatives of Apollo and Check-Cap (being their respective board chairs) in order to fund the pursuit of accretive acquisition targets or other growth initiatives of Apollo and for no other purpose. Check-Cap and Apollo have identified acquisition targets and growth initiatives for which the proceeds of the US$6.0 million loan will be used.
As of December 31, 2025, US$2.1 million of the Segregated Account had been used for acquisition targets and growth initiatives, US$0.7 million had been used for certain expenses incurred by the Company, and US$2.2 million remained in the Segregated Account. In July 2025, in connection with the audit of the Company’s December 31, 2024 financial statements, the Company classified the $2.1 million used for acquisition targets and growth initiatives as a $2.1 million loan to Apollo and entered into a loan agreement with Apollo on the same terms as the December 2024 Loan Agreement to document such classification. Also, in July 2025, in connection with the audit of the Company’s December 31, 2024 financial statements, the Company classified the $2.2 million remaining in the Segregated Account as of December 31, 2024 as a $2.2 million loan to Apollo and entered into a loan agreement with Apollo on the same terms as the December 2024 Loan Agreement to document such classification, given that the Segregated Account is in the name of an affiliate of Apollo.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had provided total loan funding of approximately $16.3 million to Apollo under a series of loan agreements. Management recorded a full allowance for credit losses against these loans under ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, as of December 31, 2024. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, management reversed the impairment and reinstated the loan receivable at $6,525,000, reflecting the recoverable 7.5% interest based on the management-assessed equity value of Apollo at June 30, 2025. On November 14, 2025, following the 98.01% shareholder vote in favor of the Merger at the 2025 Annual General Meeting, the Company recognized a noncash debt-for-equity exchange: the loan receivable of $6,525,000 was derecognized and an equity investment in Apollo was recognized at cost of $6,525,000 with no gain or loss recorded. See Note 14 to our audited consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this Annual Report. As of December 31, 2025, a payable to Apollo of approximately $1,400,000 is presented as a standalone liability, representing amounts paid by Apollo on behalf of the Company, net of settlements during the second half of 2025.
47
On September 4, 2025, we entered into the Parea APA with Parea to acquire certain assets relating to a Ghost Kitchen area representative business.
On September 12, 2025, we entered into the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which MBody AI will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Merger was approved by our shareholders on November 14, 2025, and closing is anticipated in the first half of 2026. Upon closing of the Merger, the Company expects to change its name to “MBody AI Ltd.” or a similar name approved by the Israeli Registrar of Companies and continue as a publicly traded company on Nasdaq, with MBody AI’s business comprising its principal operations. Check-Cap’s legacy business will continue its research and development activities. Check-Cap will continue to hold its legacy assets, consisting primarily of patents and proprietary medical equipment. The Merger is also expected to complement and create potential synergies with Check-Cap’s Ghost Kitchen franchise rights in New Jersey. At the effective time of the closing of the Merger, current MBody AI shareholders are expected to hold approximately 90% and current Check-Cap shareholders are expected to hold approximately 10% of the outstanding ordinary shares of the combined company on a fully diluted basis, subject to certain adjustments.
At the effective time of the closing of the Merger, the Apollo BCA will be terminated by mutual consent of the parties such that no termination fee will be due to Apollo or the Company, so long as the Company continues to be open to future integration with Apollo. Upon the closing of the Merger, the loans made by the Company to Apollo that are currently outstanding will be converted into a 7.5% equity position in Apollo that will be owned by the Company, and each of the related loan agreements between the Company and Apollo will be cancelled for no further consideration.
On December 17, 2025, we entered into the Purchase Agreement with ARC, pursuant to which ARC has committed to purchase up to $30.0 million of the Company’s ordinary shares.
MBody AI
Overview
MBody AI” is a Nevada corporation incorporated on October 7, 2024 and headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada. MBody AI is an artificial intelligence technology company that designs, integrates, and manages AI-enabled robotic and software systems for large commercial environments, including hotels, casinos, convention centers, and other high-traffic facilities. MBody AI’s core business combines its proprietary AI software platform, the AI Orchestrator™, with robotic automation and data analytics to provide solutions for the hospitality, property management, and commercial cleaning sectors.
MBody AI provides turnkey solutions to enterprise customers, including hardware procurement, deployment, financing, and ongoing operational management of autonomous systems. MBody AI does not manufacture robots or autonomous hardware; rather, it procures third-party robotic equipment from suppliers and integrates such equipment with its proprietary software platform to deliver coordinated autonomous solutions to its customers. MBody AI’s customers include large-scale hospitality groups and other enterprises with complex operational environments.
On September 12, 2025, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement with MBody AI, pursuant to which MBody AI will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. For additional information regarding MBody AI and the Merger, see the Company’s Report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on September 12, 2025, which includes the proxy statement for the Company’s annual general meeting of shareholders. For MBody AI’s audited financial statements as of December 31, 2024 and for the period from October 7, 2024 (date of formation) to December 31, 2024, and as of June 30, 2025 and for the six months then ended, see the Company’s Report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on January 30, 2026.
48
Technology and Products
MBody AI’s AI Orchestrator platform is a proprietary, hardware-agnostic software platform designed to integrate and coordinate diverse robotic and autonomous systems within a single operating environment. The platform provides enterprise customers with a unified interface for managing heterogeneous robot fleets, enabling coordination, monitoring, and optimization of autonomous hardware from multiple original equipment manufacturers. The platform incorporates machine learning capabilities intended to enable the system to adapt and optimize its operations over time based on data collected from customer deployments.
The AI Orchestrator platform is deployed through a phased rollout of features, with certain capabilities delivered incrementally to customers. Customer deployments are typically customized to the specific requirements of each customer’s facilities and operating environments, and may involve coordination with customer personnel and third-party vendors.
MBody AI historically deployed robotic equipment at customer sites under 36-month lease agreements, with customers making fixed monthly lease payments that bundled the use of hardware together with maintenance, warranty, and service support. Beginning in 2025, MBody AI commenced a strategic transition toward a software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) and AI-platform subscription model, which is intended to emphasize recurring, higher-margin software revenues. Under this model, customers are provided continuous access to MBody AI’s proprietary software platform and AI-driven analytics suite. MBody’s subscription agreements range from 24-60 months.
MBody AI’s revenue is derived from the following sources:
| ● | AI Platform Subscription Revenue. Recurring monthly or annual fees charged to customers for access to MBody AI’s cloud-based platform, including fleet management, task scheduling, AI analytics dashboards, and model updates. |
| ● | AI-Enabled Services Revenue. Fees for integration services, customization of AI models, data insights, and advanced analytics modules tailored to individual customer requirements. |
| ● | Deployment and Support Revenue. Fees for installation, on-site setup, calibration, and initial operator training associated with new customer deployments. |
| ● | Maintenance and Warranty Revenue. Fees for extended maintenance, service, and warranty support, typically over a 36-month term. |
| ● | Hardware Enablement Revenue. Revenue from the delivery of robotic equipment procured from third-party vendors, which is provided to customers as part of MBody AI’s turnkey deployment model. |
Market Opportunity
MBody AI operates in the markets for artificial intelligence, automation, and autonomous systems. The adoption of autonomous systems and robotics in enterprise environments has been increasing across a number of industry verticals, including hospitality, gaming, healthcare, and data center operations. MBody AI’s platform is designed to address the need of enterprise customers to coordinate and manage multiple autonomous systems from different manufacturers within a single integrated environment.
MBody AI’s target customers include large enterprises with complex, high-traffic operational environments that may benefit from the deployment of autonomous systems to improve operational efficiency. MBody AI has entered into arrangements with enterprise customers in the hospitality and gaming sectors and seeks to expand the scope and number of its customer deployments over time. MBody AI’s customers operate in regulated industries, and deployment of autonomous systems in certain jurisdictions may require regulatory approvals, licenses, or compliance with industry-specific rules, including gaming and safety regulations.
Competition
The markets for artificial intelligence, automation, and autonomous systems are rapidly evolving and highly competitive. MBody AI faces competition from companies that develop and deploy robotics and autonomous systems, as well as other technology companies that offer solutions for enterprise automation. New technologies, business models, and competitors may emerge that could reduce demand for MBody AI’s platform or render its offerings less competitive. MBody AI’s ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including the functionality and reliability of its platform, the breadth of its hardware integrations, and its ability to continue to innovate and adapt to evolving market requirements.
49
Ghost Kitchens New Jersey
On September 5, 2025, the Company entered into the Parea APA, pursuant to which the Company acquired all right, title, and interest in a contract granting exclusive Ghost Kitchen area representative rights across the state of New Jersey. As consideration for the acquired assets, the Company issued 1,169,596 ordinary shares to Parea.
Ghost Kitchen operations involve commercial kitchen facilities that operate in non-retail environments and are designed exclusively for the preparation of food for take-out and delivery. As the exclusive area representative for Ghost Kitchen in New Jersey, the Company has the right to drive franchise sales, deliver training, and provide ongoing support to Ghost Kitchen franchisees throughout the state. Under the Ghost Kitchen Area Representative Agreement, the Company is entitled to receive 50% of all initial franchise fees and 50% of all ongoing royalties paid by Ghost Kitchen franchisees in New Jersey.
The acquisition of Ghost Kitchen franchise rights in New Jersey represents a component of the Company’s strategy to pursue revenue-generating opportunities while it evaluates and pursues strategic alternatives. The Company’s ability to generate revenue from the Ghost Kitchen area representative rights is dependent on the successful sale of Ghost Kitchen franchises in New Jersey and the ongoing operations of those franchisees. For additional information regarding the Parea APA, see the Company’s Report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on September 5, 2025.
C-Scan
CRC screening can reduce the incidence of and mortality from the disease by enabling detection of precancerous polyps in the colon at an earlier, more treatable stage. CRC is one of the few cancers that can be prevented through screening because pre-cancerous polyps, from which colon cancers often develop, can be identified and removed. Today, there is a range of options for CRC screening in the average-risk population, with current technology falling into two general categories: (i) structural exams that enable physicians to visualize the colon for abnormalities, such as optical colonoscopy (which is currently regarded as the “gold standard” for CRC screening), sigmoidoscopy, CTC and optical capsules-all of which require aggressive bowel preparation and are invasive exams; and (ii) stool and serum based tests, such as FOBTs, FITs, stool DNA, and blood tests, which test for blood in stool and irregularities in blood and DNA. Notwithstanding the proven clinical value of screening for CRC, the many CRC screening alternatives and the fact that screening is encouraged by clinicians and insurers, a large portion of the population is still reluctant to perform CRC screening.
C-Scan is designed to enable early detection of precancerous polyps while providing a patient friendly solution without requiring any colon cleansing. The purpose of C-Scan is to detect colorectal polyps in subjects who, based on demographics and medical history factors, are considered average risk for CRC. If polyps are detected, the patient is elevated to high risk for CRC and referred for a colonoscopy. Studies have shown the detection of polyps through C-Scan, increases the likelihood of patients to agree (i.e., “adherence”) to undergo a colonoscopy procedure.
Although C-Scan utilizes X-Ray technology (exposing the patient to approx. 0.05 mSv), we believe that the potential risks associated with such radiation exposure are low compared to the potential risks associated with other procedures such as perforation, bleeding or sedation related effects (optical colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy) and dehydration and damage to kidneys. Unlike FOBTs, FITs and stool DNA tests, our capsule-based imaging modality generates structural information on the colon, which could assist in the detection of pre-cancerous polyps. We therefore do not believe that the ultra-low-dose radiation in our capsule will make C-Scan less attractive to physicians and patients than other less-effective products that do not employ any radiation.
50
Our Technology
Our technology is based on an ingestible capsule (C-Scan Cap), which is swallowed by the patient and propelled by natural motility through the gastrointestinal tract. Our capsule transmits information to a receiving device (C-Scan Track) worn on the patient’s body that stores the information for off-line analysis. Our C-Scan Cap consists of an X-ray source and several X- ray detectors. The X-ray source is contained in a rotating radiation shield, enabling the generation of 360-degree angular scans. The collection of successive angular scans is intended to enable the virtual reconstruction of a portion of the colon’s inner surface. During movement of our capsule longitudinally through the colon, successive images of portions of the colon enable the three- dimensional reconstruction of the colon. C-Scan is also intended to enable structural identification of polyps, and masses, which protrude inward into the colon, through the detection of irregularities in the topography of the colon’s inner surface.
C-Scan is intended to be prescribed to patients by physicians. Prior to capsule ingestion, patients will swallow 15ml of iodinated oral contrast medium, three times a day, combined with oral fiber, and continue to do so in order to enhance the contrast of the colon surface. The capsule is propelled by natural motility through the gastrointestinal tract. During transit, information is transmitted to the C-Scan Track, which stores the information for off-line analysis. After our C-Scan Cap is expelled from a patient’s body, the C-Scan Track data will be downloaded into our workstation (C-Scan View) and uploaded to a cloud-based server, through which an expert analyst will perform pre-analysis to be followed by a physician’s final interpretation that includes a findings report and a determination of whether the patient is considered average or elevated risk.
C-Scan consists of the following three main subsystems that together enable the generation of high-resolution 3D imaging of the colon’s inner surface, further described below: (i) an ultra- low-dose X-ray based colon scanning capsule (C-Scan Cap); (ii) C-Scan Track; and (iii) a client\server PC-based application (C-Scan-View).
The C-Scan system enables a patient-friendly, preparation free and painless evaluation of colorectal abnormalities. Using the C-Scan system, suspicious findings that may be colorectal polyps can be identified, thus assisting the physician in deciding whether to elevate the patient to high-risk category and refer the patient to a colonoscopy procedure. Studies have shown that the adherence of an elevated-risk patient to undergo a colonoscopy procedure is higher than that of an average risk patient.
The C-Scan system provides information for the physician, enabling him to make a “YES / NO” decision for suspected presence of polyps in the colon, based on the premise that the presence of polyps in the colon is associated with the potential development of CRC. The C-Scan system is intended to be used as a preliminary tool to assist in the detecting of subjects who are at elevated risk for polyps and thus potentially increase the adherence of those subjects to undergo colonoscopy.
The C-Scan system is designed to evaluate the presence of polyps, without the need for fasting and prior bowel cleansing, through identifying suspects in the human colon supported by physiological data, such as measured transit time of the capsule through the GI tract.
The C-Scan system presented in Figure 1 includes three main units, C-Scan Cap, C-Scan Track and C-Scan View. The C-Scan procedure steps are illustrated in Figure 2. The C-Scan Track is attached to the patient’s back, after which, the patient ingests the C-Scan capsule. The capsule starts moving through the patient’s gastrointestinal system until it reaches the colon where it starts scanning the colon walls and transmitting the acquired data to the C-Scan Track. Following the natural excretion of the capsule, the patient returns the C-Scan Track to enable data loading and analysis using C-Scan View. The analysis report includes an indication of either “NO- Average Risk” in cases where no suspicious findings were identified or “YES- Elevated Risk” in cases where suspicious findings were identified. An operational block diagram is presented below in Figure 4.
51
Figure 1: Illustration of C-Scan system units
Figure 2: Illustration of C-Scan system procedure
C-Scan Cap
C-Scan Cap is an X-ray scanning capsule, which enables detection of suspected polyps. C-Scan Cap is ingested by the patient and propelled by peristalsis, natural motility, it passes through the gastrointestinal tract and is excreted naturally, with either no need for retrieval or required retrieval of the capsule, depending on the local agency guidance (currently, during clinical trials in the U.S., the C-Scan capsule is not intended to be disposed of in the sanitary sewer system, and is therefore collected by the patient, and returned to the medical facility administering the device for further decay and disposal).
C-Scan Cap is designed to measure, collect and transmit structural information, and is comprised of the following components:
| ● | X-ray Source - Including radioactive material sealed in a cylindrical housing. |
| ● | Collimator - Radiation shield around the source, which absorbs most of the radiation. Several radial holes enable emission of radiation in defined directions. |
| ● | X-ray Sensor - Comprised of several solid state X-ray detectors for measuring the scattered radiation intensity. |
| ● | Tilt Sensor - Indication of capsule motion (3D acceleration). |
| ● | Rotation Motor - For rotating the collimator and X-ray Source. |
| ● | Compass sensor - Indication of true north (reference coordinate system). |
| ● | Pressure sensor - indicating the hydrostatic pressure inside the colon. |
| ● | Source Concealment Mechanism - Conceals the source inside the radiation shield. |
| ● | R-T - Radio frequency transceiver device to communicate with the receiver. |
| ● | Batteries - Electrical power supply for the capsule. |
| ● | Memory - Data storage. The capsule should be able to store up to an hour of measured data. |
| ● | C-Scan Track Coil - Transmits a continuous electromagnetic field utilized by an external localization system to track 3D position. |
52
Image for illustration purpose only
Figure 3: C-Scan Cap
C-Scan Track
C-Scan Track is a small, disposable system attached to the patient’s back via biocompatible adhesive skin patches. C-Scan Track communicates with the C-Scan Cap and enables data download for analysis purposes. Both the C-Scan Track and C-Scan Capsule are equipped with an electromagnetic capability allowing for capsule position and orientation estimations through the C-Scan Track. A dedicated scan control algorithm (SCA) identifies the C-Scan Cap’s movements in the colon and, accordingly, commands the C-Scan Cap when to perform a scan. C-Scan Track also measures the transit time from capsule ingestion to excretion through radio frequency communication to a non-volatile memory device, and enable data retrieval, to an external processor.
The C-Scan Track is comprised of the following components:
| ● | Sticker Housings - Biocompatible and water-resistant stickers and housing integrating all functional components, attached to the patient’s back, enabling approximately five days of continuous operation. |
| ● | Recorder - Consists of receiver electronics embedded software and nonvolatile memory. |
| ● | Antennas - Radio frequency antennas are embedded into the sticker housings and used to communicate with the capsule. |
| ● | Activation/Deactivation Circuit - Used to activate/deactivate the C-Scan Track through a specialized protocol. |
| ● | UI Indicators - Provides user with vocal and vibration indication as required. |
| ● | PCB - Electronics’ printed circuit boards. |
| ● | Microcontroller - Runs embedded software, logic that manages the C-Scan Track and SCA. |
| ● | RF Transceivers - Several transceivers used to communicate with the capsule. |
53
| ● | TILT/Compass Sensors - To determine the patient’s body movements. |
| ● | Batteries - Electrical power supply for the C-Scan Track. |
| ● | Memory - Non-volatile data storage to store data acquired by the system. |
Image for illustration purpose only
C-Scan View
The C-Scan View software is a client/server-based application that enables procedure data to be downloaded from the C-Scan Track, data analysis and report generation. The C-Scan View’s main functions are:
| ● | Load and display procedure information and data; |
| ● | Image review, enabling the user to view structural information of the colon wall; |
| ● | Produce procedure report; and |
| ● | Store procedure results on server. |
The data from the C-Scan Track is loaded and processed to create a reconstruction model of the colon wall, which is displayed in the C-Scan View as structural information of the colon wall, as well as Whole-Gut-Transit-Time (WGTT) data. The data is analyzed by a team that includes expert analysts, who review the structural information to identify suspicious findings that are protruding or bulging on the colon wall. The analysts consider the capsule’s WGTT as part of the analysis process. The gastroenterology physician reviews the analysis in the C-Scan View and generates the final report as to whether the patient is assessed to be at average or at elevated risk, determined through a combined analysis consisting of both structural analysis and transit time analyses.
Figure 4: Conceptual block-diagram of the C-Scan system
C-Scan System Non-Clinical and Clinical History
We have developed and validated our capsule-based imaging modality for providing structural information on colonic polypoid lesions and masses for CRC screening. Below is a summary of the validation tests carried out by us in the laboratory, in phantoms, animals and humans, which were designed to evaluate this new imaging modality’s performance and potential clinical value.
54
Non-Clinical Testing
Imaging Performance Testing
The C-Scan Cap transmits data as it transits the colon. This data consists of imaged slices perpendicular to the capsule’s longitudinal axis; slices are then reconstructed by the C-Scan View to produce 2D and 3D images of the inner surface of the colon. Following are performance measurements of the capsule imaging.
| ● | Modulation Transfer Function, or MTF. The capsule was moved along a longitudinal-edge phantom setup in 3mm steps. The figure below shows a typical raw signal after filtering for peak detection. The same test was carried out using an angular-edge phantom setup, which demonstrated similar results to those shown below. These tests do not take into account noise characteristics. |
Image for illustration purpose only
For each position of the capsule in the phantom, the mean signal intensity (peak) was measured, the result of which is shown in the right figure below. Resulting line spread function, or LSF, which is the differential of the curve in the left figure below.
Image for illustration purpose only
The graphs above demonstrate that the existing design of C-Scan can detect objects of approximately 2-3mm when noise is not taken into account.
| ● | Resolution Limit: Estimation of the Smallest Visible Object Size. In order to estimate the size of the smallest visible object, both spatial resolution and noise characteristics must be taken into account. The graph below presents the estimated MTF of C-Scan. Noise analysis indicates MTF 1/3 for minimum visibility, which demonstrates that the smallest visible object that can be detected with the existing design of C-Scan (in the conditions used, which included a colon diameter of 30mm) is of approximately 5-6 mm (see graph below). |
Image for illustration purpose only
Image Reconstruction
Two main characteristics of C-Scan contribute to the image reconstruction performance:
| ● | The number of photons hitting the detector per time frame. |
| ● | The angular spread of the photon beam coming out of the capsule collimator. |
55
Based on the laboratory tests performed with a previous version of C-Scan, polyps of 6 mm and larger should be visible and 10 mm polyps and larger are expected to be detected at higher sensitivity. To further enhance the visibility of 6 mm - 9 mm polyps, a new design of the collimator, which is expected to enable 1.5 times the number of photons to be detected by the detectors, was successfully incorporated and tested in our advanced C-Scan Cap.
Animal Testing and Tissue Equivalent Phantom Image Reconstruction
The physics of our imaging modality was tested in the laboratory on phantoms with tissue equivalent material and in animals to ensure that laboratory conditions mimic real life clinical scenarios.
Following the initial proof of concept, we performed a series of studies in order to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary safety of our technology.
The animal studies conducted to date demonstrate that our technology provides sufficient resolution, in these studies, for the detection of 10 mm polyps which is the size of clinically significant polyps. The animal studies also demonstrated that 5 mm polyps can be detected, though with lower resolution than 10 mm polyps in the first animal capsule. Animal health was maintained throughout the studies. No adverse effects related to passage of our capsule were noted.
The capsules evaluated in the animal studies were significantly larger than the capsules that we are using with humans. The differences in anatomy, physiology, and capsules may have several effects on the data compared to use in the human population. Motility of the capsules through the digestive C-Scan was slow due to the specific shape of the porcine gastrointestinal tract. In addition, because of the size of the capsule, it was retained in the stomach for many hours and even days. Accordingly, the animal model required that normal ingestion be replaced by direct insertion of the capsule into the small bowel. In order to simplify the development and animal testing, we used Tungsten radiation source with long half-life (120 days).
Following the success of the animal testing, a series of in-vitro tests were conducted to simulate different clinical scenarios in the laboratory using a miniaturized human capsule. Polyps were created and reconstruction of the laboratory phantoms with a human capsule was generated to assess the ability to detect polyps as the capsule advances in the colon. The in-vitro tests demonstrated the imaging capabilities of our imaging technology. Below is the reconstruction of a laboratory phantom image.
Image for illustration purpose only
Polyp Detection Analysis
Laboratory tests were carried out to estimate the capsule’s ability to detect polyps in phantoms and demonstrate sensitivity and specificity of such detection. Below is an example of the reconstruction of a scan composed of three slices: XRF, CMT and a fused (combined) image.
Image for illustration purpose only
56
Receiver Operating Characteristics
Standard receiver operating characteristics, or ROC, curves were generated from phantom data with 8 mm polyp in a 30 mm barrel phantom with 3% iodine concentration mimicking the colon contents. CMT, XRF and fused (combined) data were analyzed based on 2D slices that were generated and standard deviation indicator. There were a few cases where the noise in the phantoms was high enough to generate polyp false positive condition separately for each data type, especially in CMT. However, fusion of CMT and XRF data contributed to noise reduction and enabled to demonstrate 100% true positive and 0% false positive.
Image for illustration purpose only
Clinical Trials
We initiated our first clinical study at University Hospital, Hamburg, Germany in 2010. The purpose of this study was to monitor and record the colon contractions and the associated motility of the capsule in the colon. This study was conducted with a passive capsule that contained no X-ray source or detectors. It included several electronic components of C-Scan and had similar dimensions to the current capsule. 63 healthy volunteers were enrolled, and no adverse events were reported.
We completed a limited, single-center, feasibility study at Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel to assess the motility of a non-scanning capsule in healthy subjects. The objective of the study was to optimize the daily routine of the subjects in order to shorten the transit time of our capsule. 15 subjects participated and swallowed a capsule with the same weight and dimensions as our current C-Scan capsule. No adverse events were reported and all capsules were retrieved. A structured daily routine determined the timing of the following: capsule ingestion, the subjects’ daily meals, the contrast agent ingestion and one evening dose of 10 mg of Bisacodyl. All subjects continued their regular active lifestyles (such as work and exercise). The average transit time of the capsule in the 15 subjects was approximately 38 ± 19 hours, which is comparable to the average transit time of our capsule in subjects participating in the multi-center feasibility study, in which the participants do not ingest a daily dose of Bisacodyl, and participants are released to their homes and continue their regular lifestyles during the study.
A 10 subject clinical proof-of-concept study, conducted at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in Israel using a prior version of C-Scan, did not identify any material safety or feasibility issues. The study demonstrated the applicability of C-Scan to the human colon, generating images of the colon without any prior bowel preparation. All subjects ingested the capsule easily with smooth passage within the designated transit time, on average, within 48-72 hours. There were no reported device-related adverse events. Mild effects on bowel movements were noted, which were determined to be related to the contrast agent and passed within one to two days after the capsule excretion. Estimated total radiation exposure was calculated using standard established factors for calculating effective radiation exposure, such as the duration of the capsule inside the body, and was based on the activity of the radiation source inside the C-Scan Cap and radiation energy, both of which were measured for each case study. The average calculated exposure for the entire procedure in the 10-case study, from ingestion of the capsule to excretion, was 0.03 mSv (STD 0.007 mSv). This level of radiation exposure is similar to a single chest X-ray (approximately 0.06mSv) and two orders of magnitude less than a CTC.
57
The 10-subject study constituted the initial phase of a multi-center, prospective clinical feasibility study to establish the safety, functionality and preliminary efficacy of C-Scan in patients eligible for CRC screening, by comparing results from the clinical feasibility study with those from non-invasive, low-sensitivity FITs, as well as from optical colonoscopies. The feasibility study has been designed to allow for the recruitment of 100 subjects. The study was conducted at multiple centers in Israel. The clinical feasibility study was used to evaluate the image resolution generated by the capsule in a human colon without cathartic preparation, assess polyp imaging in various shapes and in different segments of the colon, evaluate the safety of the device in terms of total and segmental transit time, and analyze the effects of the presence of polyps and variable colon dimensions on these parameters. During the feasibility study we collected data regarding the overall imaging of the colon’s internal surfaces during the passage of the capsule to support the development of a correlation map of polyps identified through our imaging system with polyps imaged by optical colonoscopy and CTC. Additionally, the feasibility study allowed for the measurement of total radiation exposure and the distribution of contrast material within the colon.
Analysis conducted on the first 66 capsules swallowed by participants enrolled in the multi-center, prospective clinical feasibility study showed that 65 of 66 capsules swallowed were naturally eliminated, without major or minor side effects, after 62±40.7 hours. The average calculated radiation exposure was 0.06 ± 0.04 mSv (similar to a single chest radiograph). Image reconstructions allowed 2D/3D views of the colonic wall and lumen with the typical contour of different segments (hepatic flexure, triangular shape of the transverse colon). Both pedunculated and sessile polyps were detected in several patients and validated later by colonoscopy.
In September 2017, we completed a multi-center study of C-Scan in support of CE Mark submission. The objective of the study was to assess safety and the clinical performance of C- Scan in detecting patients with polyps. The three-center trial enrolled 66 patients, with a mean age of 59 years. Following capsule ingestion, subjects swallowed small doses of contrast agent and fiber supplements with each meal throughout capsule passage. Average capsule transit time was 52±32 hours, and the average total X-ray dose was 0.05 mSv (CT colonography effective dose is ~ 6.0 mSv). No bowel preparation, sedation, or change in diet was required. Both confirmatory colonoscopy, performed by an independent investigator, and C-Scan review, performed by a central review group, were blinded to results. The study demonstrated a 44% sensitivity in the 45 subjects included in the analysis for polyps, with specificity (ability to correctly identify lack of polyps) of 89%. Sensitivity strongly correlated (R-squared = 0.98) to the percentage of the colon scanned. Sensitivity was 78% (p<0.05) and 100% (p<0.05) for subjects where greater than 50% and 70% of the colon was scanned, respectively. Specificity was consistent for all subjects.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, we initiated an interim clinical study for the purpose of introducing an advanced C-Scan version, Version 3, which incorporated the then latest algorithms and system optimization and tailored scanning of the colon to the patient’s natural colonic movements to maximize the amount of the colon that is tracked and imaged. In March 2018, we announced results from the interim study. Evaluable results of 21 patients showed average colon imaging coverage of 64%, a 40% improvement over 46% average colon imaging coverage in the multi-center study. Sensitivity was 78% (p<0.05) for subjects with greater than 50% colon imaging coverage and 100% (p<0.05) for subjects with greater than 70% colon imaging coverage. Specificity was consistent at around 89%.
During the first quarter of 2018, we initiated a multi-center, open label, home monitoring, prospective study, designed to determine the performance characteristics of C-Scan Version 3, for detecting pre-cancerous polyps compared with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), in each case using colonoscopy as the reference method, for the purpose of collecting additional evidence of clinical effectiveness and clinical utility to support market adoption. The study included 90 evaluable patients who either had known polyps or were considered to be of average risk. Each patient ingested a C-Scan capsule and also underwent a FIT and a comparative colonoscopy performed by independent gastroenterologists, who were blinded to the corresponding test’s results. The C-Scan clinical evaluation was obtained using the evaluable patient population implementing a gender-based motility analysis and the results of both C-Scan and FIT were compared to colonoscopy. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was sensitivity (ability to correctly identify patients with polyps) and specificity (ability to correctly identify patients with lack of polyps) of the C-Scan system compared to FIT in detecting subjects with polyps ≥10 mm. In July 2019, we announced final results from our post-CE approval study. The results demonstrate that C-Scan achieved a sensitivity of 76% (p=0.0005) in patients with polyps ≥10 mm, while FIT achieved a sensitivity of 29% (p=0.005) in patients with polyps ≥10 mm. C-Scan achieved a specificity of 82% in all patients, while FIT achieved a specificity of 96% in all patients. In addition, C-Scan detected all 4 patients (100%) with polyps ≥40 mm, while the FIT detected only 1 of the 4 patients (25%) with polyps ≥40mm. Overall, C-Scan achieved a sensitivity of 66% (p=0.01) in all patients, including patients with polyps <10mm, while FIT achieved a sensitivity of 23% (p<0.0001) in all patients, including patients with polyps <10mm. In total, 142 patients enrolled in the study and after factoring in technical and physiological dropouts and protocol violations, the number of evaluable patients was 90. No SAEs were reported, and the adverse events were mild in severity.
58
In December 2018, we received from the FDA conditional approval of our IDE application to initiate a U.S. pilot study of the C-Scan Version 3 and received final approval from the FDA in February 2019. In April 2019, we initiated the U.S. pilot study of C-Scan. The U.S. pilot study (NCT03735407) was a prospective, multi-center, open label, single arm study designed to evaluate the safety, usability and subject compliance of the C-Scan. The study included 28 evaluable patients, more than two thirds of whom were considered to be of average risk for colorectal cancer. Each patient ingested a C-Scan capsule and also underwent a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) as well as a comparative colonoscopy, which was performed by an independent gastroenterologist who was blinded to the corresponding test results. The study was performed at two sites, the NYU Grossman School of Medicine and Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate the incidence of device or procedure related SAEs. Secondary endpoints included patient compliance, subject satisfaction and device and procedure related performance. Due to sample size, the study was not designed to be powered for statistical significance. In December 2019, we announced the results of the study. No device or procedure related SAEs were reported and all device or procedure related adverse events were mild in severity. In total, 45 patients enrolled in the study, of which 40 patients underwent the study procedure. 39 patients complied with the procedure and completed a questionnaire following the procedure and reported higher satisfaction with C-Scan procedure compared to colonoscopy. A total of 28 patients were evaluable after factoring in technical and physiological dropouts and protocol violations. Analysis of the evaluable patient results revealed agreement between C-Scan and colonoscopy in detection of polyps was consistent with data from the post-CE approval study.
In preparation of the U.S. pivotal study, we continued to optimize the functionality of our advanced version of C-Scan, which incorporates mainly advanced algorithms, improved detection capability and reduced energy consumption, through additional clinical data collection in a study in Israel (initially on average risk and high-risk patients and in May 2022, shifted to enrollment of only average risk patients), for the purpose of further calibration of the C-Scan system, which we have continued in parallel to conducting the first stage of the U.S. pivotal study that was initiated in May 2022.
In November 2020, we finalized our proposed U.S. pivotal study design and submitted our IDE application to the FDA and in March 2021, our IDE application was approved by the FDA. In January 2022, we submitted a supplement to the FDA to amend the U.S. pivotal study design to add a first part to the study that is designed to enable further device calibration of the C-Scan system and enhancement of C-Scan algorithms, specifically for the average risk U.S. population. In February 2022, we received the FDA’s approval for our IDE supplement. Following this amended IDE, the U.S. pivotal study consists of two parts. The first part is designed to enable further calibration of the C-Scan system for the average risk U.S. population, and is intended to include up to 200 patients in the U.S. The second part is a statistically powered, randomized study which will compare the performance of C-Scan to traditional colonoscopy, and is intended to include up to 800 patients. The goal of the pivotal study in the United States is to (i) demonstrate device safety as evidenced by a lack of device related SAEs; and (ii) provide efficacy data concerning C- Scan’s performance.
In May 2022, we initiated the first part of the U.S. pivotal study, which focuses on device calibration and enhancement of C-Scan algorithm among average risk population, initially at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota and New York University (NYU) School of Medicine. In addition, we recently added a new site as well as expanded the NYU site.
In January 2023, we obtained approval from the FDA for our protocol amendment to lower the patient age enrollment criteria to 45-75 years (from 50-75 years previously) in the U.S. pivotal study. Our NYU site has already obtained approval of this amendment from its Institutional Review Board (IRB) and begun to implement it to recruit younger patients as part of the first part of our U.S. pivotal study.
59
The initiation of the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study was dependent upon successful completion of the calibration portion of the U.S. pivotal study. On March 21, 2023, we announced that following our internal assessment of the clinical data collected from the calibration studies until such date, we had determined that the most recent efficacy results from our calibration studies did not meet the goal to proceed to the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study and, as such, the initiation of the second part of the U.S. pivotal study that was expected in mid-2023 was also temporarily postponed. As a result, we adopted a plan of action that included conducting additional clinical data analysis and approaching the FDA to make amendments to the U.S. pivotal study and a cost reduction plan in order to extend its cash runway to longer than initially planned.
On June 6, 2023, we announced that after further review of additional data and interaction with the FDA on a revised pivotal study protocol together with the anticipated time and investment necessary to further develop the technology, we were reducing our workforce significantly to reduce cash burn, concentrating our resources on essential research activities, discontinuing our calibration studies, and evaluating and pursuing strategic options. Currently, we do not have manufacturing capabilities, nor do we have any active studies.
Research and Development
Our research and development strategy has been centered on developing C-Scan. On June 6, 2023, we announced that after further review of additional data and interaction with the FDA on a revised pivotal study protocol together with the anticipated time and investment necessary to further develop the technology, we were reducing our workforce significantly to reduce cash burn, concentrating our resources on essential research activities, discontinuing our calibration studies, and evaluating and pursuing strategic options.
We have received grants from the Government of the State of Israel through the IIA (formerly the OCS) for the financing of a portion of our research and development expenditures and a portion of our expenditures relating to our transition to manufacturing pursuant to the Innovation Law and related regulations and guidelines. As of December 31, 2025, we had received funding from the IIA for research and development of our C-Scan in the aggregate amount of approximately $5.6 million. As of December 31, 2025, we had not paid any royalties to the IIA and had a contingent liability to the IIA with respect to such funding in the amount of approximately $6.2 million. In addition, in January 2021, we received an IIA grant approval to support the funding of our transition from research and development to manufacturing. The final IIA grant amounted to approximately $620,000 (NIS 2.25 million) (along with a co-investment by us of the same amount), which we are not required to repay to the IIA, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the grant approval, of which we received approximately $225,000 (NIS 816,075) in February 2023 and $82,000 (NIS 297,414) in January 2022. We may apply for additional IIA grants in the future; however, there is no assurance that such applications will be approved in the amount requested or at all. We cannot predict whether we will be entitled to any future grants, or the amounts of any such grants. See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Operations in Israel - Pursuant to the terms of the Israeli government grants we received for research and development expenditures, we are obligated to pay certain royalties on our revenues to the Israeli government. In addition, the terms of Israeli government grants we received require us to satisfy specified conditions and to make additional payments in addition to repayment of the grants upon certain events.”
We incurred approximately $0, $0 and $8.3 million in research and development expenses, net (after deducting participation by government grants) for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. For additional information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations- Financial Operations Overview-Research and Development Expenses, Net.”
Intellectual Property
An important part of our competitive strategy is to seek, when appropriate, protection for our products and proprietary technology through a combination of U.S. and foreign patents, trademarks, trade secrets, non-disclosure and confidentiality, assignment of invention and other contractual arrangements with our employees, consultants and suppliers. These measures, however, may not be adequate to protect our technology from unauthorized disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation as these parties may breach these agreements, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. We intend to prosecute and defend our proprietary technology. The primary test for patent protection eligibility includes patentability, novelty, non- obviousness, and utility.
60
We submit applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, which is an international patent law treaty that provides a unified procedure for filing a single initial patent application to seek patent protection for an invention simultaneously in each of the member states. Although a PCT application is not itself examined and cannot issue as a patent, it allows the applicant to seek protection in any of the member states through national-phase applications.
While our policy is to obtain patents by application, to maintain trade secrets and to seek to operate without infringing on the intellectual property rights of third parties, technologies related to our business have been rapidly developing in recent years. Additionally, patent applications that we may file may not result in the issuance of patents, and our issued patents and any issued patents that we may receive in the future may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. For example, we cannot predict the extent of claims that may be allowed or enforced in our patents nor be certain of the priority of inventions covered by pending third-party patent applications. If third parties prepare and file patent applications that also claim technology or therapeutics to which we have rights, we may have to partake in proceedings to determine priority of invention, which could result in substantial costs to us, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. Moreover, because of the extensive time required for clinical development and regulatory review of a product we may develop, it is possible that, before C-Scan can be commercialized, related patents will have expired or will expire a short period following commercialization, thereby reducing the advantage of such patent. Loss or invalidation of certain of our patents, or a finding of unenforceability or limited scope of certain of our intellectual property, could have a material adverse effect on us. See Item 3D “Key Information-Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Legacy Intellectual Property.”
In addition to patent protection, we rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology innovation, drawings, technical specifications and other proprietary. We also rely on protection available under trademark laws, and hold the following registered trademarks in the United States and Hong Kong: “CHECK CAP”, CHECK CAP (logo), “C-Scan” and C-Scan (logo) and the following registered trademarks in the European Union: CHECK CAP (logo), “C-Scan” and C-Scan (logo), and the following trademark applications are pending in China: “CHECK CAP”, CHECK CAP (logo), “C-Scan” and C-Scan (logo).
In March 2021, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with the University of Missouri with respect to certain patents held by the University of Missouri that the University of Missouri claimed included background intellectual property in C-Scan. In consideration for the grant of an exclusive license to those patents in the medical field, we agreed to pay royalties ranging from $0.30 to $5.00 per C-Scan unit depending on the number of units sold up to $15,000,000 in the aggregate.
C-Scan Competition
Competition for C-Scan comes from traditional well-entrenched manufacturers of tests and equipment for CRC screening, such as colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, CTC, optical capsule endoscopy, FOBTs and FITs. The principal manufacturers of equipment for optical colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy include Olympus, Pentax, Hoya and Fuji Film. The principal manufacturers of equipment for CTC include General Electric Healthcare Systems, Siemens Medical Solutions, Philips Healthcare and Toshiba Corporation. The principal manufacturer of equipment for optical capsule endoscopy includes Medtronic plc. All of these companies have substantially greater financial resources than we do, and they have established reputations as well as worldwide distribution channels for providing medical instruments to physicians.
In addition, several companies have developed or are developing non-invasive technologies based on stool, serum (from blood and other bodily fluids), or molecular diagnostics (MDx), tests that are used to indicate the presence of CRC and polyps in the colon. These companies include Exact Sciences, Polymedco, Epigenomics AG, Gene News, EDP Biotech Corporation, Illumina, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, VolitionRx Nu.Q diagnostic, Freenome, Grail, Guardant, Genoscopy and Universal DX. Exact Sciences commenced sales of its Cologuard ®, a non-invasive stool DNA screening test for colorectal cancer in 2015, and is constantly seeking performance improvements through additional studies, alongside commercial expansion. During the past years, there has been an extensive effort on the part of our competitors to utilize molecular biology and advanced computational techniques to develop methods capable of identifying cell-free cancer biomarkers.
61
Procedures for bowel cleansing that are less onerous are constantly being developed, which could make our entry into the market more difficult. For instance, bowel cleansing initiated by the ingestion of pills or food-substitute diet regimes rather than through drinking large amounts of distasteful liquids may be viewed as an improvement to the cleansing process, but other screening methods may be even more palatable to patients.
Sales and Marketing
We are not currently engaged in any sales or marking activities. If we determine to resume the development of our C-Scan technology, we will need to rebuild and recommence our sales and marking efforts. Any resumption of our sales and marketing efforts will be subject to certain challenges, including, among others, that:
| ● | our technology has been tested on a limited basis and therefore we cannot assure the product’s clinical value; |
| ● | we need to raise an amount of capital sufficient to complete the development of our technology, obtain the requisite regulatory approvals and commercialize our current and future products; |
| ● | following the receipt of CE Mark of conformity to protection standards for sale of the C-Scan system in the European Union, we may need to obtain additional regulatory approvals in certain local jurisdictions in the European Union before we can commence marketing and sale of C-Scan and will need to obtain the requisite regulatory approvals in the United States, Japan and other markets where we plan to focus our commercialization efforts; |
| ● | we need to obtain reimbursement coverage from third-party payors for procedures using C-Scan; |
| ● | we need to scale-up our manufacturing capabilities of C-Scan in commercial quantities at an adequate quality and at an acceptable cost; and |
| ● | we need to establish and expand our user base while competing against other sellers of capsule endoscopy systems as well as other current and future CRC screening technologies and methods. |
Our ability to operate our business and achieve our goals and strategies is subject to numerous risks as described more fully in “Risk Factors.”
Manufacturing and Suppliers
We do not currently have any manufacturing capabilities. Prior to winding down our manufacturing capabilities, our manufacturing operations were conducted at our facility located in Isfiya, Israel and in our own X-ray production line in Petach Tikva. On January 26, 2021, we entered into a new lease agreement, as amended (the “Amended Lease Agreement”), according to which, effective as of April 1, 2021, we leased a total of approximately 1,550 square meters at our facility located in Isfiya, Israel. The Amended Lease Agreement expired on December 31, 2023. Monthly rental expenses under the lease agreement are $16,100. Prior to entering into the Amended Lease Agreement, we leased approximately 900 square meters at the same facility under a lease agreement, originally scheduled to expire on May 31, 2022. Following the determination of our Board of Directors on June 6, 2023 to discontinue our clinical studies, we did not extend the Amended Lease Agreement that expired on December 31, 2023. However, on November 11, 2023, we agreed with the lessor to lease part of the premises in Isfiya (the “New Leased Premises”) until February 29, 2024, for a monthly rental fee of $8,300. On April 15, 2024, we and the lessor agreed on extending the lease of the New Leased Premises for a two-year period commencing on March 1, 2024, for a monthly rental fee of $8,300. We may terminate such lease upon a 60 days prior notice to the lessor.
62
On December 30, 2021, we entered into a Sub-lease Agreement (the “Sub-lease Agreement”) with one of our suppliers, according to which we leased approximately 70 square meters laboratory space for the production of certain components, at the supplier’s premises in Petach Tikva, Israel. The Sub-lease Agreement entered into effect on September 21, 2022, after receipt of certain permits including a business license from Petach Tikva municipality. The Sub-lease Agreement was due to expire on January 31, 2025. We had the right to terminate the Sub-lease Agreement at any time, upon at least 90 days prior written notice. The Sub Lease Agreement was part of an amended service agreement with the supplier for certain additional services. Total monthly rental expenses under the Sub-lease Agreement and the payment for such other services was $26,900. As the Sub-lease Agreement is part of a service agreement with the supplier, management was required to evaluate the fair market amount attributed to the lease per month and based on its estimations, the amount allocated to the lease was approximately $2,800 and the portion allocated to monthly services was $24,100. Following the determination of our Board of Directors on June 6, 2023 to discontinue our clinical studies, on June 8, 2023, we terminated the Sub-lease Agreement and such service agreement in Petach Tikva, and the Sub-lease Agreement terminated on September 8, 2023.
On March 1, 2022, we entered into a lease agreement of certain offices in Petach Tikva Israel, according to which, we leased approximately 140 square meters offices. The lease agreement expired on February 28, 2024, and we had an option to extend the lease period for two additional periods of one year each. Total monthly rental expense under the lease agreement was approximately $1,700. In September 2023, the office lease agreement in Petach Tikva was terminated by the parties.
In July 2016, we entered into an agreement with GE Healthcare to develop and demonstrate proof of principle of the process for high-volume manufacturing for the production of the X- ray source and its assembly into our C-Scan capsule. The agreement was amended in November 2017 in order to further our manufacturing collaboration with GE Healthcare. The agreement involves GE’s final assembly, packaging and shipping of C-Scan capsules. We supplied GE Healthcare with supporting calibration and final assembly methodology and equipment and in August 2019, we announced the completion of manufacturing line transfer implementation and qualification for C-Scan operated by GE Healthcare, primarily to enable the availability of C-Scan for U.S. clinical trials.
In January 2021, we received an IIA grant approval to support the funding of our transition from research and development to manufacturing. The final IIA grant amounted to $620,000 (NIS 2.25 million) including for the purpose of the establishment of our own X-Ray source manufacturing line in Israel. We do not currently have any sales. During 2022 and 2023, we expanded our manufacturing capacity to support the expected larger clinical volume and subsequent higher volumes expected in the early commercialization stage.
Environmental Health and Safety Matters
We are subject to environmental health and safety laws and regulations in Israel, governing, among other things, the use of radioactive materials, including the Israeli Radioactive Elements and their Products, Regulation, 1980, the Hazardous Substances Law, 5753-1993 and regulations thereunder, including the Licensing of Business Regulations (Disposal of Hazardous Substances), 5750-1990, the Israeli Work Safety Regulations (Occupational Safety and Health of Ionizing Radiation Practitioners) 1992-5753 and Women Employment Regulations (Work with Ionizing Radiation), 1979-5739. Our current research and development activities, including our production activities, require (and our currently contemplated commercial activities will require) permits from various governmental authorities including, Israel’s Ministry of Environmental Protection, Israel’s Ministry of Health, local municipal authorities and the NRC and Agreement State regulators. Failure to obtain or maintain any such permits or to comply with their conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Health conduct from time to time periodic inspections in order to review and ensure our compliance with the various regulations.
These laws, regulations and permits could potentially require expenditure by us for compliance or remediation. If we fail to comply with such laws, regulations or permits, we may be subject to fines and other civil, administrative or criminal sanctions, including the revocation of permits and licenses necessary to continue our business activities and could be subject to work stoppages or delays. In addition, we may be required to pay damages or civil judgments in respect of third-party claims, including those relating to personal injury (including exposure to radioactive materials) or contribution claims. Some environmental, health and safety laws apply strict, joint and several liability. We may be identified as a responsible party under such laws. Such developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
63
In addition, laws and regulations relating to environmental, health and safety matters are often subject to change. In the event of any changes or new laws or regulations, we could be subject to new compliance measures or to liabilities for activities which were previously permitted.
U.S. Government Regulation
C-Scan is a medical device subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other U.S. federal and state regulatory bodies. To ensure that medical products distributed in the United States are safe and effective for their intended use, the FDA has promulgated regulations that govern, among other things, the following activities that we or our partners perform and will continue to perform:
| ● | product design and development; |
| ● | product testing; |
| ● | validation and verifications; |
| ● | product manufacturing (good manufacturing practices); |
| ● | product labeling; |
| ● | product storage, shipping and handling; |
| ● | premarket clearance or approval; |
| ● | advertising and promotion; |
| ● | product marketing, sales and distribution; |
| ● | product recalls; and |
| ● | post-market surveillance reporting death or serious injuries and medical device reporting. |
FDA’s Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements
Unless an exemption applies, before we can commercially distribute medical devices in the United States, we must obtain, depending on the type of device, either prior premarket notification, or 510(k) clearance, de novo authorization or approval of a PMA from the FDA. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes:
| ● | Class I devices, which are subject to only general controls (e.g., labeling, medical devices reporting, and prohibitions against adulteration and misbranding) and, in some cases, to the 510(k) premarket clearance requirements; |
| ● | Class II devices, generally requiring 510(k) premarket clearance before they may be commercially marketed in the United States; and |
| ● | Class III devices, consisting of devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices, or devices deemed not substantially equivalent to a predicate device, generally requiring the submission of a PMA approval supported by clinical trial data. |
64
510(k) Clearance Pathway
To obtain 510(k) clearance, we must submit a premarket notification, or 510(k) notice, demonstrating that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to a previously cleared 510(k) device or a device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, for which the FDA has not yet called for the submission of PMA applications. By regulation, a premarket notification must be submitted to the FDA at least 90 days before we intend to market a device, and we must receive 510(k) clearance from the FDA before we actually market the device. The Medical Device User Fee Amendments, or the MDUFA, performance goal for a traditional 510(k) clearance is 90 days. As a practical matter, however, the 510(k)clearance pathway may take approximately between 6 to 9 months, but it can take significantly longer. FDA may require additional information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence.
There are three types of 510(k)s: traditional, special, and abbreviated. Special 510(k)s are typically for devices that have certain technological, design or labelling changes that require a new 510(k) but where the method(s) to evaluate the changes are well established and the results of change evaluation can be sufficiently reviewed in a summary or risk analysis format. Abbreviated 510(k)s are for devices that conform to special controls for the device type or to a recognized standard. The special and abbreviated 510(k)s are intended to streamline review, and the FDA intends to process special 510(k)s within 30 days of receipt.
After a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a new or major change in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or, depending on the modification, require PMA. The FDA requires each manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change requires submission of a 510(k), or a PMA, but the FDA can review any such decision and can disagree with a manufacturer’s determination. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s determination, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance or PMA is obtained. If the FDA requires us to seek 510(k) clearance or PMA for any modifications to a previously cleared product, we may be required to cease marketing or recall the modified device until we obtain this clearance or approval. Also, in these circumstances, we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.
De Novo Reclassification
Medical device types that the FDA has not previously classified as Class I, II or III are automatically classified into Class III regardless of the level of risk they pose. To market low to moderate risk medical devices that are automatically placed into Class III due to the absence of a predicate device, a manufacturer may request a de novo down-classification. This procedure allows a manufacturer whose novel device is automatically classified into Class III to request classification of its medical device into Class I or Class II on the basis that the device presents low or moderate risk, rather than requiring the submission and approval of a PMA application. A medical device may be eligible for de novo classification if the manufacturer first submitted a 510(k) premarket notification and received a determination from the FDA that the device was not substantially equivalent or a manufacturer may request de novo classification directly without first submitting a 510(k) premarket notification to the FDA and receiving a not substantially equivalent determination. The FDA is required to classify the device within 120 calendar days following receipt of the de novo application, although in practice, the FDA’s review may take significantly longer. During the pendency of the FDA’s review, the FDA may issue an additional information letter, which places the de novo request on hold and stops the review clock pending receipt of the additional information requested. In the event the de novo requestor does not provide the requested information within 180 calendar days, the FDA will consider the de novo request to be withdrawn. If the manufacturer seeks reclassification into Class II, the manufacturer must include a draft proposal for special controls that are necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the medical device. In addition, the FDA may reject the de novo request for classification if it identifies a legally marketed predicate device that would be appropriate for a 510(k) or determines that the device is not low to moderate risk or that general controls would be inadequate to control the risks and special controls cannot be developed. In the event the FDA determines the data and information submitted demonstrate that general controls or general and special controls are adequate to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, the FDA will grant the de novo request for classification. When the FDA grants a de novo request for classification, the device is granted marketing authorization and further can serve as a predicate for future devices of that type, through a 510(k) premarket notification.
Alternatively, if a 510(k) clearance is sought and the device is found not substantially equivalent, or NSE, a de novo petition must be filed within 30 days from the receipt of the NSE determination. The request should include a description of the device, labeling for the device, reasons for the recommended classification and information to support the recommendation. The de novo process following an NSE determination has a 60-day review period, although it is typical for the review to take far longer. If the FDA classifies the device into class II, the company will then receive an approval order to market the device. This device type can then be used as a predicate device for future 510(k) submissions. However, if the FDA subsequently determines that the device will remain in the class III category, then the device may not be marketed until the company has obtained an approved PMA.
65
Premarket Approval Pathway
A PMA application must be submitted if the device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) process or is found ineligible for de novo reclassification. PMAs are generally required for Class III devices that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury. The PMA application process is generally more costly and time consuming than the 510(k) process. A PMA application must be supported by extensive data including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trials, manufacturing and labeling to demonstrate to the FDA’s satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use.
After a PMA application is submitted, the FDA has 45 days to determine whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review and thus whether the FDA will file the application for review. After a PMA application is sufficiently complete, the FDA will accept the application and begin an in-depth review of the submitted information. By statute, the FDA has 180 days to review the “accepted application,” although, generally, review of the application may take at least 12 to 18 months, but it may take significantly longer. During this review period, the FDA may request additional information or clarification of information already provided. Also, during the review period, an advisory panel of experts from outside FDA may be convened to review and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. In addition, the FDA will conduct a preapproval inspection of the manufacturing facility to ensure compliance with quality system regulations.
Upon completion of the PMA application review, the FDA may: (i) approve the PMA which authorizes commercial marketing with specific prescribing information for one or more indications, which can be more limited than those originally sought; (ii) issue an approvable letter which indicates the FDA’s belief that the PMA application is approvable and states what additional information the FDA requires, or the post-approval commitments that must be agreed to prior to approval; (iii) issue a not approvable letter which outlines steps required for approval, but which are typically more onerous than those in an approvable letter, and may require additional clinical trials that are often expensive and time consuming and can delay approval for months or even years; or (iv) deny the application. If the FDA issues an approvable or not approvable letter, the applicant has 180 days to respond, after which the FDA’s review clock is reset.
New PMA applications or PMA application supplements are required for modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, including, for example, certain types of modifications to the device’s indication for use, manufacturing process, labeling and design. PMA supplements often require the submission of the same type of information as a PMA application, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original PMA application and may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel.
Breakthrough Device Program
The FDA has implemented a Breakthrough Device Program that is intended to provide patients and providers with expedited access to breakthrough medical technologies that have the potential to provide more effective treatment or diagnosis for life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases or conditions by expediting their development, assessment and review while preserving the statutory standards for premarket approval. A device also must meet one of the following criteria: (i) it represents breakthrough technology; (ii) there is no approved or cleared alternative; (iii) it offers significant advantages over existing cleared or approved devices; or (iv) availability of the device is in the best interest of patients. In February 2021, the FDA granted us a Breakthrough Device designation for C-Scan. For further information, see “-Regulatory Pathway for C-Scan.”
66
Under the program, we are eligible to receive priority review and interactive communications from the FDA regarding device development and clinical trial protocols, all the way through to commercialization decisions. In addition, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has created expedited and special reimbursement pathways and programs based on FDA’s Breakthrough Device designation, for which we may be eligible.
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials are almost always required to support a PMA application or de novo reclassification petition and are sometimes required for a 510(k) premarket notification. If the device presents a “significant risk,” as defined by the FDA, to human health, the FDA requires the device sponsor to file an IDE application with the FDA and obtain IDE approval prior to commencing the human clinical trials. During the trial, the sponsor must comply with the FDA’s IDE requirements for investigator selection, trial monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping. The investigators must obtain patient informed consent, rigorously follow the investigational plan and study protocol, control the disposition of investigational devices, and comply with all reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Clinical trials for significant risk devices may not begin until the IDE application is approved by the FDA and the appropriate institutional review boards, or IRBs, at the clinical trial sites. An IRB is an appropriately constituted group that has been formally designated to review and monitor medical research involving subjects and which has the authority to approve, require modifications in, or disapprove research to protect the rights, safety and welfare of human research subjects. A nonsignificant risk device does not require FDA approval of an IDE; however, the clinical trial must still be conducted in compliance with various requirements of the FDA’s IDE regulations and be approved by an IRB at the clinical trials sites. We, the FDA, or the IRB at each site at which a clinical trial is being performed may withdraw approval of a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a belief that the risks to study subjects outweigh the benefits or a failure to comply with FDA or IRB requirements. Even if a trial is completed, the results of clinical testing may not demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the device, may be equivocal or may otherwise not be sufficient to obtain approval or clearance of the product.
Similarly, in Europe the clinical study must be approved by the local ethics committee and in some cases, including studies of high-risk devices, by the Ministry of Health in the applicable country. For further information, see “- Regulation in Europe, Israel, Japan and Other Countries.”
Sponsors of clinical trials of devices are required to register with clinicaltrials.gov, a public database of clinical trial information. Information related to the device, patient population, phase of investigation, study sites and investigators, and other aspects of the clinical trial is made public as part of the registration.
Pervasive and Continuing FDA Regulation
After a device is cleared or approved for marketing, numerous and pervasive regulatory requirements continue to apply. These include:
| ● | establishment registration and device listing with the FDA; |
| ● | QSR requirements, which require manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the design and manufacturing process; |
| ● | labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of investigational products, or the promotion of “off-label” uses of cleared or approved products; |
| ● | requirements related to promotional activities; |
| ● | clearance or approval of product modifications to 510(k)-cleared devices that could significantly affect safety or effectiveness or that would constitute a major change in intended use of one of our cleared devices, or approval of certain modifications to PMA-approved devices; |
67
| ● | medical device reporting regulations, which require that a manufacturer report to the FDA if a device it markets may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or has malfunctioned and the device or a similar device that it markets would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, if the malfunction were to recur; |
| ● | correction, removal and recall reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that may present a risk to health; |
| ● | the FDA’s recall authority, whereby the agency can order device manufacturers to recall from the market a product that is in violation of governing laws and regulations; and |
| ● | post-market surveillance activities and regulations, which apply when deemed by the FDA to be necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device. |
Quality Systems Regulation Requirements
Our manufacturing processes are required to comply with the applicable portions of the QSR, which cover the methods and the facilities and controls for the design, manufacture, testing, production, processes, controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, distribution, installation and servicing of finished devices intended for human use. The QSR requires that each manufacturer establish a quality systems program by which the manufacturer monitors the manufacturing process and maintains records that show compliance with FDA regulations and the manufacturer’s written specifications and procedures relating to the devices. The QSR also requires, among other things, maintenance of records and certain documentation, a device master file, device history file, and complaint files. QSR compliance is necessary to receive and maintain FDA clearance or approval to market new and existing products. As a manufacturer, we are subject to periodic scheduled or unscheduled audits or inspections by the FDA. Our failure to maintain compliance with the QSR requirements could result in the shut-down of, or restrictions on, our manufacturing operations and the recall or seizure of our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. The discovery of previously unknown problems with any of our products, including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of increasing severity or frequency, whether resulting from the use of the device within the scope of its clearance or off-label by a physician in the practice of medicine, could result in restrictions on the device, including the removal of the product from the market or voluntary or mandatory device recalls.
The FDA has broad regulatory compliance and enforcement powers. As manufacturers, we and our third-party manufacturers are subject to announced and unannounced inspections by the FDA to determine our compliance with quality system regulation and other regulations. We have not yet been inspected by the FDA. If the FDA determines that we failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can take a variety of compliance or enforcement actions, which may result in any of the following sanctions:
| ● | FDA untitled letters, FDA Form 483s, FDA warning letters, it has come to our attention letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties; |
| ● | unanticipated expenditures to address or defend such actions; |
| ● | customer notifications or repair, replacement, refunds, recall, detention or seizure of our products; |
| ● | recall, detention or seizure of our products; |
| ● | operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production; |
| ● | refusing or delaying our requests for regulatory approvals or clearances of new products or modified products; |
| ● | withdrawing of 510(k) clearances or PMA approvals that have already been granted; |
68
| ● | refusal to grant export approval for our products; or |
| ● | civil or criminal prosecution. |
The FDA can also publish Safety Communications or Letters to Health Care Providers when the agency becomes aware of new issues involving a specific product or, or more broadly, a product family. These communications are posted on the FDA’s website and describe the FDA’s analysis of a current issue and provide specific regulatory approaches and clinical recommendations for patient management.
FCC Clearance and Regulation
Because C-Scan includes a wireless radio frequency transmitter and receiver, it is subject to equipment authorization requirements in the United States. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, requires authorization of radio frequency devices before they can be sold or marketed in the United States, subject to limited exceptions. The authorization requirements are intended to confirm that the proposed products comply with FCC radio frequency emission, power level standards, and other technical requirements and will not cause interference. Our system is using the same frequency band as other approved capsules. The current design of C-Scan complies with the FCC’s technical requirements and received FCC authorization. We expect that our future advanced design will also comply with the FCC’s technical requirements, so we expect that it will also be authorized by the FCC.
Third-Party Coverage and Reimbursement
Coverage of and reimbursement for C-Scan and related procedures, after approval, will be subject to the requirements of various third-party payors, including government-sponsored healthcare payment systems and private third-party payors. Coverage policies and reimbursement methodologies vary significantly from program-to-program and may be subject to federal and state regulations. For example, the Social Security Act requires all items and services to be “reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member” in order to be covered by Medicare. While Medicare might not provide separate reimbursement for a device, it may include payment for the device in the payment to the facility or physician for the related procedure. Third-party payors’ coverage and reimbursement policies, including their interpretations of whether an item or service is “reasonable and necessary” or experimental and/or investigational, and their payment methodologies, are subject to change pursuant to legislation, regulation, or, in the case of private payors, negotiations with industry and providers.
Fraud and Abuse Laws
In the United States, the healthcare industry is subject to extensive federal, state, and local regulation. Both federal and state governmental agencies subject the healthcare industry to intense regulatory scrutiny, including heightened civil and criminal enforcement efforts. These laws constrain the sales, marketing and other promotional activities of manufacturers of medical devices, by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements (including sales programs) we may have with hospitals, physicians and other potential purchasers of the medical devices. The laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to:
| ● | The federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, knowingly or willingly offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward the purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease or order of any health care items or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, by federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between medical device manufacturers on one hand and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other. Further, PPACA, among other things, clarified that a person or entity needs not to have actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it. Although there are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute protecting certain common business arrangements and activities from prosecution or regulatory sanctions, the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that do not fit squarely within an exemption or safe harbor may be subject to scrutiny; |
69
| ● | The federal civil False Claims Act, which prohibits, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment of government funds or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay money to the government or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing, or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. In addition, PPACA amended the Social Security Act to provide that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act. Many medical device manufacturers and other healthcare companies have been investigated and have reached substantial financial settlements with the federal government under the civil False Claims Act for a variety of alleged improper marketing activities, including providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product; providing consulting fees, grants, free travel, and other benefits to physicians to induce them to use the company’s products. In addition, in recent years the government has pursued civil False Claims Act cases against a number of manufacturers for causing false claims to be submitted as a result of the marketing of their products for unapproved, and thus non-reimbursable, uses. Device manufacturers also are subject to other federal false claim laws, including, among others, federal criminal healthcare fraud and false statement statutes that extend to non-government health benefit programs; |
| ● | Analogous state laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, may apply to items or services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor. Several states now require medical device manufacturers to report expenses relating to the marketing and promotion or require them to implement compliance programs or marketing codes. For example, California, Connecticut and Nevada mandate the implementation of corporate compliance programs, while Massachusetts and Vermont impose more detailed restrictions on device manufacturers’ marketing practices and tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation and other remuneration to healthcare providers; |
| ● | The federal Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1997 and other similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from providing money or anything of value to officials of foreign governments, foreign political parties, or international organizations with the intent to obtain or retain business or seek a business advantage. Recently, there has been a substantial increase in anti-bribery law enforcement activity by U.S. regulators, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Violations of these laws can result in the imposition of substantial fines, interruptions of business, loss of supplier, vendor or other third-party relationships, termination of necessary licenses and permits, and other legal or equitable sanctions. Other internal or government investigations or legal or regulatory proceedings, including lawsuits brought by private litigants, may also follow as a consequence; and |
| ● | The federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act, being implemented as the Open Payments Program, requires manufacturers of “covered products” (drugs, devices, biologics, or medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program) to track and publicly report payments and other transfers of value that they provide to U.S. physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as any ownership interests that U.S. physicians hold in applicable manufacturer. Applicable manufacturers must submit a report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, by the 90th day of each calendar year disclosing payments and transfers of value made in the preceding calendar year. |
Violations of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, may cause us to be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from government-funded healthcare programs, like Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.
Privacy Laws
HIPAA/HITECH and related U.S. federal and state laws protect the confidentiality of certain patient health information, including patient records, and restrict the use and disclosure of that protected information. In particular, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services promulgated patient privacy rules under HIPAA.
70
These privacy rules protect medical records and other personal health information by limiting their use and disclosure, giving individuals the right to access, amend and seek accounting of their protected health information and limiting most use and disclosures of health information to the minimum degree reasonably necessary to accomplish the intended purpose. Because, once approved, we intend to sell products to persons and entities subject to HIPAA and are exposed to personally-identifiable health information in the course of our operations, we also may be subject to certain elements of HIPAA, particularly as a business associate to covered entities, as well as similar state laws. HIPAA imposes civil and criminal penalties for violations of its provisions, which could be substantial. State privacy laws have their own penalty provisions with which we would also be expected to comply.
NRC Regulatory Matters
As a manufacturer of a medical device containing a sealed, radioactive source, we are subject to regulation by various governmental authorities that oversee the possession, use, and disposal of radioactive material. These regulations govern, among other things, the design, development, testing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution, import/export, sale, and marketing and disposal of our product.
The C-Scan capsule contains within the device a radioactive sealed source, which contains a small amount of radioactive material. This material aids in the imaging and scanning capabilities of the device as it passes through the patient. The C-Scan capsule is ingested by the patient, and passes through the patient’s gastrointestinal tract before exiting the human body.
Depending on where we manufacture and distribute the device, various countries’ nuclear regulatory laws and regulations may apply. Israeli nuclear regulatory laws apply to the radioactive material in the device. We adhere to the Israeli regulations and guidance for the design, development, testing, manufacturing and packaging, as well as the applicable nuclear regulations in the manufacturing phase.
In the United States, the C-Scan capsule is undergoing clinical trials. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or the NRC, and state nuclear regulatory agencies oversee the use of radioactive materials in the United States. The NRC regulates the use of radioactive materials in medical devices under several parts of its regulations, including 10 C.F.R. Part 20, “Standards for Protection Against Radiation,” 10 C.F.R. Part 30, “Rules of General Applicability to Domestic Licensing of Byproduct Material,” and 10 C.F.R. Part 35, “Medical Use of Byproduct Material.” NRC Agreement States implement similar regulations under a nuclear regulatory framework developed by the state pursuant to authority delegated by the NRC.
In accordance with applicable NRC regulations, and relevant NRC Agreement State requirements, we comply with the radioactive materials safety and handling requirements applicable for our development of our C-Scan technology applicable to clinical trials. The NRC also places conditions and limitations on the disposal of radioactive material in the sanitary sewer. In 2022, after extensive engagement with the NRC, we submitted a petition for rulemaking to the NRC, requesting that the agency amend the NRC regulations at 10 CFR 20.2003(b), which pertains to disposal of radioactive material into the sanitary sewer system, to include the disposal of the C-Scan capsule. Under the NRC’s current interpretation of the 10 CFR 20.2003(b) regulations, disposal of a device like the C-Scan capsule into the sanitary sewer system is not currently permitted. The NRC’s review of the rulemaking request remains ongoing. Therefore, during the U.S. pivotal study, the C-Scan capsule is not intended to be disposed of in the sanitary sewer system, and is instead intended to be collected by the patient and returned to the medical facility administering the device for further storage, decay and disposal. For the collection and disposal phase of the U.S. pivotal study, we have established, through a third party, a decay and disposal process of the C-Scan capsule that is in accordance with the NRC Agreement State requirements.
In the U.S, engagement with various sites to participate in the U.S. pivotal study has been progressing slower than expected, in part due to compliance with, and the need for, the site-specific licensing and compliance with radioactive materials regulatory requirements associated with the X-ray technology contained within our C-Scan capsule.
71
The commercial sale of C-Scan will also be subject to extensive nuclear regulations in various jurisdictions around the world where the C-Scan capsule will be used, and we intend to comply with such regulations as they become applicable. We expect the commercial manufacture and distribution of C-Scan will also require us, or a company affiliated with us, to obtain a number of licenses and certifications related to nuclear regulatory compliance. We also expect that in commercialization, clinical centers/hospitals will need to obtain a number of licenses and certifications related to nuclear regulatory compliance.
Regulation in Europe, Israel, Japan and Other Countries
The European Union has adopted numerous directives and standards regulating the design, manufacture, clinical trials, labeling and adverse event reporting for medical devices. Each European Union member state has implemented legislation applying these directives and standards at the national level. Other countries, such as Switzerland, have voluntarily adopted laws and regulations that mirror those of the European Union with respect to medical devices. Devices that comply with the requirements of the laws of the relevant member state applying the applicable European Union directive are entitled to bear CE conformity marking and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed throughout the member states of the European Union and other countries that comply with or mirror these directives. The method of assessing conformity varies depending on the type and class of the product, but normally involves a combination of self-assessment by the manufacturer and a third-party assessment by a “notified body,” an independent and neutral institution appointed to conduct conformity assessment. This third-party assessment consists of an audit of the manufacturer’s quality system and clinical information, as well as technical review of the manufacturer’s product. An assessment by a notified body in one country within the European Union is required in order for a manufacturer to commercially distribute the product throughout the European Union. In addition, compliance with ISO 13845:2016 on quality systems issued by the International Organization for Standards, among other standards, establishes the presumption of conformity with the essential requirements for a CE marking. In addition, many countries apply requirements in their reimbursement, pricing or health care systems that affect companies’ ability to market products.
On January 9, 2018, we obtained the CE mark of conformity for C-Scan. On December 21, 2021, the European MDR issued a renewal of our CE mark according to the EU Regulation 2017/745 on Medical Devices for the marketing and sale of C-Scan in the European Union, valid until December 1, 2026.
C-Scan and our operations are also subject to regulation by AMAR, which is responsible for the registration of medical devices in Israel, issuance of import licenses and monitoring of marketing of medical equipment. In September 2018, we received approval from AMAR for the marketing and sale of C-Scan in Israel. Following the approval we received from our previous notified body according to the EU Regulation 2017/745, the AMAR approval was renewed and is valid until December 31, 2024.
In Japan, manufacturing and marketing medical devices are regulated by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law, or PAL. In accordance with the PAL, manufacturers must obtain a license for manufacturing medical devices from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or MHLW. A license is required for each manufacturing plant specified by an MHLW Ministerial Ordinance.
A licensed manufacturer is responsible only for manufacturing medical devices. In regard to the marketing of medical devices, the PAL specifies that a Marketing Authorization Holder, or MAH, licensed by MHLW is responsible for putting medical devices into marketplace. Licenses for marketing medical devices are divided into the following 3 types, which correspond to the classifications below:
| ● | No. 1 type license for marketing - Specially controlled medical devices (Class III, IV) |
| ● | No. 2 type license for marketing - Controlled medical devices (Class II) |
| ● | No. 3 type license for marketing - General medical devices (Class I) |
72
Generally, the process for obtaining marketing clearance for medical devices in Japan ranges from 12 months (for products with only very minor modifications from previously cleared product versions) to a few years in the case of a completely new device.
In order for us to market our products in countries other than the United States, Israel, the EU and Japan (which were described above), we must obtain regulatory approvals and comply with extensive safety and quality regulations in those countries. These regulations, including the requirements for approvals or clearance and the time required for regulatory review varies from country to country. It is customary that once a product has been cleared for sales in the US and is CE marked in the EU, many other countries will follow. Failure to obtain regulatory approval or clearance in any foreign country in which we plan to market our product may harm our ability to generate revenue and harm our business.
United Kingdom
As of January 1, 2021, the UK is a “third country” with regard to the EU (subject to the terms of the EU UK Trade Agreement) and EU law ceased to apply directly in the UK. However, the UK has retained the EU regulatory regime with certain modifications as standalone UK legislation. Therefore, the UK regulatory regime is currently similar to EU regulations, but under new legislation, the Medicines and Medical Devices Act, the UK may adopt changed regulations that may diverge from the EU legislative regime for medicines and medical devices and their research, development and commercialization. For a two-year period starting January 1, 2021, the UK adopted transitional provisions, which inter alia applied to the importation of medical devices into the UK and the acceptance of CE-certificates until the end of June 2023, subject to certain registrations with the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. From July 1, 2023, certification under the new UK medical device legislation is required to place products on the market in the UK. Medical devices will need to be registered with the MHRA before they are placed in the UK market. Medical device manufacturers based outside the UK that wish to place a device in the UK market, will need to appoint a single UK Responsible Person, who will act on its behalf to carry out specified tasks, such as registration.
Third-Party Reimbursement
Reimbursement in the United States
In the United States, healthcare providers that purchase and/or prescribe medical devices generally rely on third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid, or private health insurance plans, to reimburse all or a portion of the cost of the devices, as well as any related healthcare services utilizing the device.
Coverage is not guaranteed simply because a product has received FDA clearance or approval or has a CPT or HCPCS code that describes the product or service. For example, Medicare’s general definition of a medically necessary service is one that is reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of an illness or injury, or that improves the functioning of a malformed body member.
Since the 1990s, Medicare has covered a number of CRC screening tests from non-invasive fecal based tests to colonoscopy, providing a range of choices for patients to choose the most individually suitable modalities.
The cost-effectiveness of a device (or the service in which a device is used) may be a key factor in obtaining third-party payer reimbursement for such device or service, but is not commonly a factor for Medicare. Medicare covers certain CRC screening tests and procedures for Medicare beneficiaries that meet certain eligibility criteria, as authorized by Sections 1861(s)(2)(R) and 1861(pp) of the Social Security Act and regulations at 42 CFR 410.37. However, Medicare coverage of CRC screening tests as defined under Section 1861(pp)(1)(D) states “Such other tests or procedures, and modifications to tests and procedures under this subsection, with such frequency and payment limits, as the Secretary determines appropriate, in consultation with appropriate organizations.” (emphasis added).
A key factor affecting the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening is patient adherence. Adherence is strongly affected by patients’ willingness to use the device (or service incorporating a device) as a screening tool for CRC.
73
Several models have been designed to demonstrate the cost effectiveness of optical colonoscopy, CTC, fecal testing and capsule endoscopy. Today, several technologies - FOBT / FIT, Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, Optical Colonoscopy, Barium Enema, and multi-target stool DNA - are covered for Medicare beneficiaries meeting certain eligibility criteria for screening for colorectal cancer, while other technologies including CTC, capsule endoscopy, and liquid biopsy are not currently covered by Medicare for CRC screening.
Third-party payors in the United States began issuing coverage policies for capsule endoscopy in early 2002, subsequent to FDA approval and availability of the technology. Initially, reimbursement policies provided coverage for capsule endoscopy of the small bowel only for the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Subsequently, reimbursement coverage has been expanded to include other diagnoses.
Currently, there is no Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial insurance reimbursement for capsule endoscopy of the colon in the United States for CRC screening, despite the availability of CPT code 91113 Gastrointestinal tract imaging, intraluminal (e.g., capsule endoscopy), colon, with interpretation and report, which became effective January 1, 2022.
In the past CRC screening NCDs, CMS has discussed appropriate test performance criteria such as point sensitivity and specificity compared to colonoscopy. The determination of appropriateness is similar to the consideration of what is appropriate for the device to be, “at least as beneficial as an existing and available medically appropriate alternative.” Through the evaluation of evidence from published studies, the clinical data for the device must reach the threshold for being appropriate. The direct evidence suggests that there is clinical utility in using FOBT and FIT for early detection of CRC because these tests reduce mortality of the disease. Conversely, there is no direct evidence on outcomes such as mortality for blood-based biomarker tests used in screening for colorectal cancer. By comparing the test performance characteristics, defined as sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, of new screening tests to gFOBT or FIT, CMS can assess whether blood-based tests might translate into similar reductions in disease mortality for Medicare beneficiaries. Thus, if the sensitivity and specificity of the new screening tests are as good as or better than the sensitivity and specificity of gFOBT or FIT, then there is indirect evidence suggesting that the new blood-based biomarker tests may reduce colorectal cancer mortality.
In January 2021, CMS updated National Coverage Determination 210.3, stating that, effective for dates of service on or after January 19, 2021, a blood-based biomarker test is covered as an appropriate CRC screening test once every 3 years for Medicare beneficiaries (i) when performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA)-certified laboratory, (ii) when ordered by a treating physician and (iii) when all of the following requirements are met: The patient is: age 50-85 years; and, asymptomatic (no signs or symptoms of colorectal disease including but not limited to lower gastrointestinal pain, blood in stool, positive guaiac fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test); and, at average risk of developing CRC (no personal history of adenomatous polyps, CRC, or inflammatory bowel disease, including Crohn’s Disease and ulcerative colitis; no family history of CRC or adenomatous polyps, familial adenomatous polyposis, or hereditary nonpolyposis CRC). The blood-based biomarker screening test must have all of the following: FDA market authorization with an indication for CRC screening; and, proven test performance characteristics for a blood-based screening test with both sensitivity greater than or equal to 74% and specificity greater than or equal to 90% in the detection of CRC compared to the recognized standard (accepted as colonoscopy at this time), as minimal threshold levels, based on the pivotal studies included in the FDA labeling.
CMS concluded that the published evidence does not show that the available blood-based biomarker CRC screening test improves health outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries. The indirect evidence (comparing a blood-based screening test to another test that has been shown to improve mortality such as screening fecal immunochemical test) does not show that blood- based screening test is equivalent in the detection of large adenomas or early stage cancer. The test performance of the Epi proColon® test does not meet sensitivity and specificity levels established by prior evidence at which the benefits of using the screening test outweigh harms to Medicare patients.
There can be no assurance that coverage of the C-Scan by Medicare and/or commercial payors will be obtained in the near future or at all. Third-party payors may deny coverage of the C-Scan if they determine that a procedure was not reasonable or necessary as determined by the payor, was experimental, does not improve health outcomes, is not equivalent in the detection of large adenomas or early-stage cancers, and/or was used for an unapproved indication (among other factors).
74
Coverage Outside the United States
In countries outside the United States, coverage for CRC screening may be obtained from various sources, including governmental authorities, private health insurance plans, and labor unions. In some countries, private insurance systems may also offer payments for some therapies. Although not as prevalent as in the United States, health maintenance organizations are emerging in certain European countries. Coverage systems in international markets vary significantly by country and, within some countries, by region. Coverage approvals must be obtained on a country-by- country or region-by-region basis.
C. Organizational Structure
On September 9, 2025, we formed CC Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Check-Cap. On May 15, 2015, we formed our wholly-owned subsidiary Check-Cap US, Inc., a Delaware corporation. On April 9, 2024, we formed our wholly-owned subsidiary Check-Cap Canada, Inc.
D. Property, Plants and Equipment
Our manufacturing operations are conducted at our facility located in Isfiya, Israel and in our own X-ray production line in Petach Tikva. On January 26, 2021, we entered into the Amended Lease Agreement, according to which, effective as of April 1, 2021, we leased a total of approximately 1,550 square meters at our facility located in Isfiya, Israel. The Amended Lease Agreement expired on December 31, 2023. Monthly rental expenses under the lease agreement are $16,100. Prior to entering into the Amended Lease Agreement, we leased approximately 900 square meters at the same facility under a lease agreement, originally scheduled to expire on May 31, 2022. Following the determination of our Board of Directors on June 6, 2023 to discontinue our clinical studies, we did not extend the Amended Lease Agreement that expired on December 31, 2023. However, on November 11, 2023, we agreed with the lessor to lease part of the premises in Isfiya until February 29, 2024, for a monthly rental fee of $8,300. On April 15, 2024, we and the lessor agreed on extending the lease of the New Leased Premises for a two-year period commencing on March 1, 2024, for a monthly rental fee of $8,300. We may terminate such lease upon a 60 days prior notice to the lessor.
On December 30, 2021, we entered into the Sub-lease Agreement with one of our suppliers, according to which we leased approximately 70 square meters laboratory space for the production of certain components, at the supplier’s premises in Petach Tikva, Israel. The Sub-lease Agreement entered into effect on September 21, 2022, after receipt of certain permits including a business license from Petach Tikva municipality. The Sub-lease Agreement was due to expire on January 31, 2025. We had the right to terminate the Sub-lease Agreement at any time, upon at least 90 days prior written notice. The Sub Lease Agreement was part of an amended service agreement with the supplier for certain additional services. Total monthly rental expenses under the Sub-lease Agreement and the payment for such other services was $26,900. As the Sub-lease Agreement is part of a service agreement with the supplier, management was required to evaluate the fair market amount attributed to the lease per month and based on its estimations, the amount allocated to the lease was approximately $2,800 and the portion allocated to monthly services was $24,100. Following the determination of our Board of Directors on June 6, 2023 to discontinue our clinical studies, on June 8, 2023, we terminated the Sub-lease Agreement and such service agreement in Petach Tikva, and the Sub-lease Agreement terminated on September 8, 2023.
On March 1, 2022, we entered into a lease agreement of certain offices in Petach Tikva Israel, according to which, we leased approximately 140 square meters offices. The lease agreement expired on February 28, 2024, and we had an option to extend the lease period for two additional periods of one year each. Total monthly rental expense under the lease agreement was approximately $1,700. In September 2023, the office lease agreement in Petach Tikva was terminated by the parties.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
75
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Annual Report beginning on page F-1. The following discussion and analysis contain forward-looking statements about our expectations, beliefs or intentions regarding, among other things, our evaluation and pursuit of strategic options, including the pending Merger with MBody AI, the Parea APA and the ARC ELOC Facility; our ability to consummate the Merger; the operations of the combined company following the closing of the Merger; our financing activities and ability to raise capital; our ability to maintain compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements; our results of operations; cash needs; financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth and strategies; the industry in which we operate; our ongoing and planned product development and clinical trials and lack thereof; the timing of, and our ability to make, regulatory filings and obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for our product candidates; our intellectual property position; the degree of clinical utility of our products, particularly in specific patient populations; our ability to develop commercial functions; and expectations regarding product launch and revenue. In addition, from time to time, we or our representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements, orally or in writing. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “should” or “anticipate” or their negatives or other variations of these words or other comparable words or by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. These forward-looking statements may be included in, but are not limited to, various filings made by us with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, press releases or oral statements made by or with the approval of one of our authorized executive officers. Forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results as of the date they are made. Our actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under Item 3D “Key Information - Risk factors,” the section titled “Forward-Looking Statement” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
The Company is a clinical stage medical diagnostics company that develops C-Scan®, a capsule-based screening technology for the detection of precancerous colorectal polyps. In June 2023, the Company announced it was reducing its workforce significantly to reduce cash burn, concentrating its resources on essential research activities, discontinuing its calibration studies, and evaluating and pursuing strategic options. For a more detailed description of the Company’s business and strategic alternatives, see Item 4B “Information on Our Company — Business Overview.”
As a result of the Company’s evaluation and pursuit of strategic options, the Company entered into the Keystone BCA in August 2023, which was terminated in December 2023 after the transaction did not receive the requisite shareholder approval. In March 2024, the Company entered into the Apollo BCA. During the term of the Apollo BCA, the Company provided loans to Apollo and deposited funds into a segregated account, as described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. In September 2025, the Company entered into the Parea APA, pursuant to which the Company acquired exclusive Ghost Kitchen area representative rights in New Jersey in exchange for the issuance of 1,169,596 ordinary shares. On September 12, 2025, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which MBody AI will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Merger was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 14, 2025, and closing is anticipated in the first half of 2026. In December 2025, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which ARC committed to purchase up to $30.0 million of the Company’s ordinary shares, subject to certain limitations and conditions.
Since our formation, we have not generated any significant revenue. We incurred net income of $4.1 million in 2025, and net losses of $25.1 million in 2024, and $17.6 million in 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $165.9 million and total shareholders’ equity of $3.4 million. We expect that we will continue to incur losses from our operations for the foreseeable future.
We have funded our operations to date primarily through equity financings, sales of our ordinary shares and warrants, the exercise of warrants and other funding transactions and through grants from the IIA. In December 2025, we entered into the Purchase Agreement with ARC, which provides for the purchase of up to $30.0 million of the Company’s ordinary shares over a three-year period, subject to certain limitations and conditions. Our financing activities are described below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to consummate the Merger, raise additional capital, including through the ARC ELOC Facility, and generate positive cash flows from operations. As further discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report, substantial doubt is deemed to exist about our ability to continue as a going concern for the one-year period from the date of issuance of these financial statements. In the event we are unable to consummate the Merger or raise additional capital, we may need to pursue a plan to license or sell our assets, seek to be acquired by another entity, cease operations, and/or seek bankruptcy protection.
76
During the year ended December 31, 2024, management fully impaired the Apollo Loans (as defined below) due to uncertainty surrounding their recoverability, recording a full allowance for credit losses in accordance with ASC 326. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, based on new information regarding Apollo’s financial condition, including a management valuation analysis in September 2025 estimating Apollo’s equity value at approximately $87 million as of June 30, 2025, management determined that the original impairment indicators no longer existed and reversed the previously recorded impairment, reinstating the loan receivable at $6,525,000 — being 7.5% of the management-assessed equity value of Apollo at that date — in accordance with ASC 310-10-35-23.
On November 14, 2025, following the 98.01% vote of Check-Cap shareholders in favour of the Merger at the 2025 Annual General Meeting, the Company recognized a noncash debt-for-equity exchange under which the loan receivable of $6,525,000 was derecognized and an equity investment in Apollo was recognized at cost of $6,525,000, with no gain or loss recorded on exchange. A payable to Apollo of approximately $1,400,000 is presented as a standalone liability as of December 31, 2025, representing amounts paid by Apollo on behalf of the Company, net of settlements during the second half of 2025. For further discussion of the Apollo loan receivable, the impairment history, and the debt-for-equity exchange, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements and “Results of Operations” below.
For a more detailed description of our business and plans, see Item 4B “Information on Our Company — Business Overview.”
A. Operating Results
Financial Operations Overview
Revenue
We have not generated any significant revenue since our inception. To date, we have funded our operations primarily through equity financings, as well as from grants that we received from the IIA. If our product development efforts result in clinical success, regulatory approval and the successful commercialization, we expect to generate revenue from sales of C-Scan.
Operating Cost and Expenses
Our operating costs and expenses are classified into two categories: research and development expenses and general and administrative expenses. For each category, the largest component is personnel costs, which consists of salaries, employee benefits and share-based compensation. Operating costs and expenses also include allocated overhead costs for depreciation of equipment. Operating costs and expenses are generally recognized as incurred. On March 21, 2023, we announced that following our internal assessment of the clinical data collected from the calibration studies until such date, we had determined that the most recent efficacy results from our calibration studies did not meet the goal to proceed to the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study and, as such, the initiation of the second part of the U.S. pivotal study that was expected in mid-2023 was also temporarily postponed. On June 6, 2023, we announced that after further review of additional data and interaction with the FDA on a revised pivotal study protocol together with the anticipated time and investment necessary to further develop the technology, we were reducing our workforce significantly to reduce cash burn, concentrating our resources on essential research activities, discontinuing our calibration studies, and evaluating and pursuing strategic options. Despite these measures, we expect personnel costs and operating costs to continue to constitute a significant portion of our expenses.
Research and Development Expenses, Net
Research and development activities have been central to our business model. Our total research and development expenses, net of participations in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 were approximately $0, $0, and $8.3 million, respectively. All research and development expenses are expensed as incurred. In anticipation of the initiation of the strategic development plan, management terminated the majority of our research and development activities. For additional information, see “Information on Our Company - Business - Research and Development.”
Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for our development activities, including:
| ● | employee-related expenses for research and development staff (including research and development, clinical, operations, production and Q&A staff), including salaries, benefits and related expenses, share-based compensation and travel expenses; |
| ● | payments associated with clinical activities including payments made to third-party CROs, investigative sites, patients, materials and consultants; |
| ● | payments associated with the development activities of our advanced C-Scan system and non-clinical activities, including payments made to third-party subcontractors, providers and consultants; |
| ● | manufacturing development costs and manufacturing scale up costs; |
| ● | costs associated with regulatory operations; |
77
| ● | facilities, depreciation and other expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities; and |
| ● | costs associated with obtaining and maintaining patents. |
Our research and development expenses, net, are net of grants for the research and development for C-Scan and for the transition from research and development to manufacturing that we have received from the Government of Israel through the IIA. Under the terms of the Innovation Law as currently in effect, in exchange for the research and development grants we received, we are required to pay the IIA royalties from our revenues up to an aggregate of 100% (which may be increased under certain circumstances) of the U.S. dollar-linked value of the grant, plus interest at the rate of 12-month LIBOR. Pursuant to regulations under the Innovation Law, the rate of royalty repayment is 3% or 4% of revenues (which may be increased under certain circumstances) from sales of products and services based on know-how funded by the IIA research and development grants we have received. As of December 31, 2025, we had received funding from the IIA for the research and development of C-Scan in the aggregate amount of approximately $5.6 million. As of December 31, 2025, we had not paid any royalties to the IIA and had a contingent obligation to the IIA in respect of such research and development grants in the amount of approximately $6.2 million. In addition, in January 2021, we received an IIA grant approval to support the funding of our transition from research and development to manufacturing. The final IIA grant amounted to $620,000 (NIS 2.25 million) (along with a co-investment by us of the same amount), which we are not required to repay to the IIA, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the grant approval, of which we received approximately $0 (NIS 0) in 2025 and 2024, and $225,000 (NIS 816,075) in February 2023. For additional information regarding the IIA grants, see Item 10E “Additional Information - Taxation - Israeli Tax Considerations and Government Programs - The Encouragement of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 5744-1984 (formerly the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development Law, 5744-1984).” There can be no assurance that we will continue to receive grants from the IIA in amounts sufficient for our operations, if at all. See also Item 3D “Key Information - Risk Factors- Risks Related to Our Operations in Israel-Pursuant to the terms of the Israeli government grants we received for research and development expenditures, we are obligated to pay certain royalties on our revenues to the Israeli government. In addition, the terms of the Israeli government grants we received require us to satisfy specified conditions and to make additional payments in addition to repayment of the grants upon certain events.”
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs, including share-based compensation expense, for persons serving as our directors and executives, finance, legal, human resources and administrative personnel, professional service fees, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and other general corporate expenses, such as communication, office and travel expenses.
Finance Income, net
Our finance income, net in fiscal year 2025, 2024, and 2023consists primarily of interest earned on our cash equivalents and short-term bank deposits and changes in provision for royalties.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are re-measured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized to “finance income, net” in the consolidated statement of operations.
Taxes on Income
The standard corporate tax rate in Israel is 23% for the 2018 tax year and thereafter.
We do not generate taxable income in Israel, as we have historically incurred operating losses resulting in net operating loss carryforwards totaling approximately 129.6 million as of December 31, 2025. We anticipate that we will be able to carry forward these tax losses indefinitely to future tax years. However, a tax loss that can be utilized in a certain tax year cannot be carried forward to future tax years. Accordingly, we do not expect to pay taxes in Israel until we have taxable income after the full utilization of our carry forward tax losses.
Under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959 and other Israeli legislation, we may be entitled to certain additional tax benefits, including reduced tax rates, accelerated depreciation and amortization rates for tax purposes on certain assets, deduction of public offering expenses in three equal annual installments and amortization of other intangible property rights for tax purposes. See Item 10E “Additional Information - Taxation- Israeli Tax Considerations and Government Programs” for additional information concerning these tax benefits.
Results of Operations
For convenience purposes, the numbers set forth in the management’s discussion and analysis below are, where applicable, rounded up and presented in millions, whereas the numbers in the tables below are presented in thousands. As result, the percentages set forth in the year-over-year comparisons below are based on numbers that have (where applicable) been rounded up to millions, which may slightly differ than the percentages that would result from the corresponding numbers set forth in the table that are presented in thousands.
78
Apollo Loan Receivable — Impairment, Reversal, and Debt-for-Equity Exchange
During 2024, the Company entered into a series of loan agreements with Apollo Technology Capital Corporation (“Apollo”, formerly known as Nobul AI Corp.) in connection with the Apollo BCA (the “Apollo Loans”), including the September 2024 Loan Agreement, the December 2024 Loan Agreement, the Third Apollo Loan, and the Fourth Apollo Loan. The aggregate principal of the Apollo Loans totaled approximately $16.3 million. The principal outstanding under each loan bore interest at 5% per annum.
Initial Impairment (Year Ended December 31, 2024)
During the year ended December 31, 2024, management determined that, due to uncertainty surrounding the recoverability of the Apollo Loans, the appropriate course was to fully impair the outstanding loan balances. At that time, Apollo exhibited severe financial distress, recurring operating losses, and negative working capital. In accordance with ASC 326, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses, management recorded a full allowance for credit losses of $16.5 million, reducing the net carrying value of the Apollo Loans to zero. The impairment was recognized within “Impairment of loans receivable” in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Reversal of Impairment (Six Months Ended June 30, 2025)
During the six months ended June 30, 2025, new information regarding Apollo’s financial condition became available, including a management valuation analysis in September 2025 which estimated Apollo’s equity value at approximately $87 million as of June 30, 2025. This represented a significant improvement compared to the conditions that existed as of December 31, 2024. Management determined that the original impairment indicators no longer existed and that the previously impaired receivable should be re-recognized in accordance with ASC 310-10-35-23. Accordingly, the Company reversed the previously recorded impairment and reinstated the recoverable portion of the loan receivable at $6.5 million, representing 7.5% of the management-assessed equity value of Apollo at June 30, 2025. The reversal of impairment of $6.5 million was recognized as a credit loss recovery in the consolidated statement of operations. The reinstated loan receivable was presented net of a payable owed by the Company to Apollo of $2.2 million, giving a net carrying value of $4.3 million as reported in the Form 6-K filed December 30, 2025.
Debt-for-Equity Exchange (November 14, 2025)
On June 30, 2025, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Apollo under which the exchange indebtedness — comprising the Apollo Loans and certain third-party notes held for the benefit of the Company, totaling approximately $16.3 million in aggregate principal — would be exchanged for common shares of Apollo representing a 7.5% shareholding at the date of issuance. The Exchange Agreement was conditional on the completion of the Merger .
On November 14, 2025, Check-Cap shareholders voted 98.01% in favor of the Merger at the 2025 Annual General Meeting, at which point the closing condition in the Exchange Agreement ceased to be substantive. Accordingly, the Company recognized the debt-for-equity exchange for accounting purposes on November 14, 2025. The loan receivable of $6.5 million was derecognized and an equity investment in Apollo was recognized at cost of $6.5 million — being the carrying value of the consideration surrendered — with no gain or loss recorded on exchange.
The equity investment in Apollo is carried at cost of $6.5 million under the ASC 321 measurement alternative. A payable to Apollo of approximately $1.4 million is presented as a standalone liability as of December 31, 2025, representing amounts paid by Apollo on behalf of the Company, net of settlements during the second half of 2025. The closing of the Merger remains subject to Nasdaq listing approval for the combined entity; no further accounting impact is anticipated from the closing. For further information, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
79
Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| (US$ in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
| Research and development expenses, net | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| General and administrative expenses | 2,373 | 9,462 | ||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (2,373 | ) | (9,462 | ) | ||||
| Impairment of loans receivable | - | (16,487 | ) | |||||
| Income on Debt Extinguishment and Conversion | 6,525 | - | ||||||
| Finance income, net | (12 | ) | 800 | |||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 4,140 | $ | (25,149 | ) | |||
Operating Income (Loss). Our operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2025 was approximately $2.4 million, as compared with approximately $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of approximately $7.1 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower general and administrative expenses in 2025.
Finance Income, net. Our finance income, net for the year ended December 31, 2025 was approximately $0.01 million, as compared to approximately $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of approximately $0.8 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to higher bank charges exceeding interest income in 2025, as well as lower interest income on short-term deposits.
Net Income (Loss). Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 was approximately $4.1 million, as compared to a net loss of approximately $25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of approximately $29.3 million.
80
Research and Development Expenses, net. Research and development expenses, net for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were $0.
| 2025 | 2024 | Change | ||||||||||
| (US$ in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Salaries and related expenses | $ | 200 | $ | 799 | $ | (599 | ) | |||||
| Share-based compensation | (12 | ) | 12 | (24 | ) | |||||||
| Professional services | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Office rent and maintenance | 105 | 81 | 24 | |||||||||
| Depreciation | - | 161 | (161 | ) | ||||||||
| Amortization | 34 | - | 34 | |||||||||
| Other general and administrative expenses | 2,046 | 8,409 | (6,363 | ) | ||||||||
| Total general and administrative expenses | $ | 2,373 | $ | 9,462 | $ | (7,089 | ) | |||||
General and Administrative Expenses. Our general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 were approximately $2.4 million, as compared to approximately $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of approximately $7.1 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower other general and administrative expenses, as well as decreases in salaries and related expenses and depreciation.
Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| (US$ in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
| Research and development expenses, net | $ | - | $ | 8,311 | ||||
| General and administrative expenses | 9,462 | 9,550 | ||||||
| Impairment of fixed assets | - | 1,426 | ||||||
| Operating loss | 9,462 | 19,287 | ||||||
| Impairment of loans receivable | (16,487 | ) | - | |||||
| Finance income, net | 800 | 1,719 | ||||||
| Net loss | $ | 25,149 | $ | 17,568 | ||||
Operating Loss. Our operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 was approximately $9.5 million, as compared with approximately $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of approximately $9.8 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to the absence of research and development expenses in 2024.
Finance Income, net. Our finance income, net for the year ended December 31, 2024 was approximately $0.8 million, as compared to approximately $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of approximately $0.9 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower interest income on short-term bank deposits.
81
Net loss. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 was approximately $25.1 million, as compared to approximately $17.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of approximately $7.6 million.
| 2024 | 2023 | Change | ||||||||||
| (US$ in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Salaries and related expenses | $ | - | $ | 4,926 | $ | (4,926 | ) | |||||
| Share-based compensation | - | (144 | ) | 144 | ||||||||
| Materials | - | 1,530 | (1,530 | ) | ||||||||
| Subcontractors and consultants | - | 800 | (800 | ) | ||||||||
| Depreciation | - | 121 | (121 | ) | ||||||||
| Cost for registration of patents | - | 78 | (78 | ) | ||||||||
| Other research and development expenses | - | 983 | (983 | ) | ||||||||
| Total research and development expenses | - | 8,294 | (8,294 | ) | ||||||||
| Less participation of the IIA (formerly the OCS) | - | 17 | (17 | ) | ||||||||
| Total research and development expenses, net | $ | - | $ | 8,311 | $ | (8,311 | ) | |||||
Research and Development Expenses, net. Research and development expenses, net for the year ended December 31, 2024 were approximately $0, as compared with approximately $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of $8.3 million or 100%. The decrease in research and development expenses, net between 2024 and 2023 was primarily due to absence of research and development activities during the year.
| 2024 | 2023 | Change | ||||||||||
| (US$ in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Salaries and related expenses | $ | 799 | $ | 2,055 | $ | (1,256 | ) | |||||
| Share-based compensation | 12 | 87 | (75 | ) | ||||||||
| Professional services | - | 4,383 | (4,383 | ) | ||||||||
| Office rent and maintenance | 81 | 235 | (154 | ) | ||||||||
| Depreciation | 161 | 88 | 73 | |||||||||
| Other general and administrative expenses | 8,409 | 2,702 | 5,707 | |||||||||
| Total general and administrative expenses | $ | 9,462 | $ | 9,550 | $ | (88 | ) | |||||
General and Administrative Expenses. Our general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 were approximately $9.5 million, as compared to approximately $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. While other general and administrative expenses increased by $5.7 million, this was largely offset by lower professional services, office rent, and salaries and related expenses.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
To date, we have funded our operations primarily through equity financings consummated prior to our initial public offering, our initial public offering, private placements, registered direct and underwritten public offerings, our warrant exercise transaction and grants that we received from the IIA (formerly the OCS) and the BIRD Foundation. In addition, in December 2025 we entered into the Purchase Agreement to establish the ARC ELOC Facility. As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $1,600 of cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, and had invested most of our available cash in short term bank deposits.
During the first quarter of 2021, certain warrant holders exercised warrants to purchase 1,210,235 ordinary shares at exercise prices ranging from $15 to $16 per share, for total gross proceeds of approximately $19.2 million. On July 2, 2021, we consummated a registered direct offering of 1,296,297 ordinary shares and warrants to purchase up to 1,296,297 ordinary shares at a combined purchase price of $27 per share and accompanying warrant, for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $35.0 million, or the July 2021 Offering. On March 3, 2022, we consummated a registered direct offering of 1,000,000 ordinary shares and warrants to purchase up to 750,000 ordinary shares at a combined purchase price of $10 per share and accompanying warrant, for aggregate gross proceeds of $10.0 million, or the March 2022 Offering. In connection with the March 2022 Offering, certain warrants to purchase up to 926,297 ordinary shares issued in the July 2021 Offering were amended to have a reduced exercise price of $13 per share and an extended exercise period to January 2, 2025. As of December 31, 2025, warrants to purchase 84,996 ordinary shares remained outstanding.
82
Since our inception through December 31, 2025, we had received funding from the IIA for research and development of C-Scan in the aggregate amount of approximately $5.6 million, of which $31,000 was received in the year ended December 31, 2020. We did not receive IIA funding for research and development for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. As of December 31, 2025, we had not paid any royalties to the IIA and had a contingent obligation to the IIA with respect to such funding in the amount of approximately $6.2 million. In addition, in January 2021, we received an IIA grant approval to support the funding of our transition from research and development to manufacturing. The final IIA grant amounted to $620,000 (NIS 2.25 million) (along with a co-investment by us of the same amount), which we are not required to repay to the IIA, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the grant approval, of which we received approximately $0 (NIS 0) in 2025 and 2024, and $225,000 (NIS 816,075) in February 2023. Royalties associated with the grant plan mentioned are not anticipated to be payable in the foreseeable future and have been accounted for as a reduction in research and development expenses in the corresponding years.
On July 13, 2014, we entered into a cooperation and project funding agreement with the BIRD Foundation and Synergy and during 2014-2017, we, together with Synergy, had received funding from the BIRD Foundation in the aggregate amount of approximately $127,000. We do not anticipate to receive additional funding from the BIRD Foundation for the project, which is no longer active. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had not paid any royalties to the BIRD Foundation and had a contingent obligation to the BIRD foundation in the amount of approximately $209,000. Royalties associated with the grant plan mentioned are not anticipated to be payable in the foreseeable future and have been accounted for as a reduction in research and development expenses in the corresponding years.
We are a clinical and development-stage medical diagnostics company and have not yet generated revenues. We have historically incurred net losses since we commenced operations in 2009. We incurred net income of $4.1 million in 2025, and net losses of $25.1 million and $17.6 million in 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, our accumulated deficit was $165.9 million. The extent of our future operating losses and the timing of becoming profitable are uncertain.
As further discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report, substantial doubt is deemed to exist about our ability to continue as a going concern for the one-year period from the date of issuance of these financial statements. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to consummate the Merger, raise additional capital, including through the ARC ELOC Facility, and generate positive cash flows from operations.
Furthermore, Management has determined that, due to uncertainty surrounding the recoverability of the loans related to the September 2023 Loan Agreement, the December 2024 Loan Agreement, the First July 2025 Loan Agreement and the Second July 2025 Loan Agreement (collectively the “Apollo Loans”), the appropriate and conservative course is to fully impair the Apollo Loans as of December 31, 2024. This assessment was made in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326 Financial Instruments — Credit Losses. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, new information regarding Apollo’s financial condition became available, including a management valuation analysis in September 2025 which estimated Apollo’s equity value at approximately $87 million as of June 30, 2025. This represented a significant improvement compared to the conditions that existed as of December 31, 2024. Management determined that the original impairment indicators no longer existed and that the previously impaired receivable should be re-recognized in accordance with ASC 310-10-35-23. Accordingly, the Company reversed the previously recorded impairment and reinstated the recoverable portion of the loan receivable at $6.5 million, representing 7.5% of the management-assessed equity value of Apollo at June 30, 2025. The reversal of impairment of $6.5 million was recognized as a credit loss recovery in the consolidated statement of operations. The reinstated loan receivable was presented net of a payable owed by the Company to Apollo of $2.2 million, giving a net carrying value of $4.3 million as reported in the Form 6-K filed December 30, 2025. See “Results of Operations” for additional information on the Apollo Loans.
As we continue to conserve cash and evaluate strategic alternatives, including the Merger, we anticipate that we will need to raise substantial additional financing in the future to fund our operations. In order to meet these additional cash requirements, we may incur debt, license certain intellectual property, and seek to sell additional equity or convertible securities that may result in dilution to our shareholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible securities, these securities could have rights or preferences senior to those of our ordinary shares and could contain covenants that restrict our operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional equity or debt financing on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
| ● | our ability to obtain funding from third parties, including any future collaborative partners; |
| ● | our ability to consummate the Merger and integrate the operations of MBody AI; |
| ● | costs associated with the Merger and related transactions; |
| ● | our ability to raise capital through the ARC ELOC Facility or other financing transactions; |
| ● | the costs of operating the Ghost Kitchen area representative business; |
83
| ● | the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing patents, patent applications, patent claims, trademarks and other intellectual property rights; |
| ● | any product liability or other lawsuits related to our product; |
| ● | the expenses needed to attract and retain skilled personnel; |
| ● | the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including product manufacturing, marketing, sales, and distribution; |
| ● | the revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product; |
| ● | the general and administrative expenses related to being a public company; |
| ● | the effect of competition and market developments |
| ● | future clinical trial results, if any; and |
| ● | the political and security situation in Israel. |
Historical Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| US$ (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (46 | ) | $ | (8,004 | ) | $ | (16,954 | ) | |||
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | 48 | $ | (840 | ) | $ | 21,356 | |||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $0.05 million, as compared to $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating costs.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 were approximately $0.05 million, as compared to net cash used in investing activities of approximately $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to lower investment in short-term bank deposits in 2025.
Financing Activities
There was no net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
We expect that our sources of cash for the year ended December 31, 2025 will include cash held in our bank accounts and may include proceeds from the exercise of warrants.
84
Capital and Operating Expenditures
We expect to incur losses from operations for the foreseeable future.
Our expected future expenditures related to product, clinical and regulatory clearances include the following:
| ● | completion of the clinical development of C-Scan; |
| ● | conducting clinical trials in the United States and other territories for purposes of regulatory approval and post-marketing validation; |
| ● | development of advanced version and future generations of C-Scan and future products; |
| ● | FDA and additional regulatory filing activities in countries we intend to commercialize our system; |
| ● | Manufacturing scale up costs; and |
| ● | Capital expenditures. |
For additional information on the capital expenditures related to our strategics transactions, see Item 3D “Key Information - Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Financial Position.”
We have operating lease obligations consisting of payments pursuant to a lease agreement for office facilities in effect as of December 31, 2025. See Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Royalties provision
Provision for royalties to an ASIC designer
In December 2007, we entered into an agreement for the development of an ASIC component to be used as an amplifier for the capture of signals at low frequencies from X-ray detectors contained in our product. The ASIC developer is entitled to receive royalties from us in the amount of €0.5 (approximately $0.53) for every ASIC component that we will sell, up to €200,000 (approximately $213,299). The net present value of the royalty liability to the ASIC designer is dependent upon our management estimates and assumption as to future product shipments and interest rates used to calculate the present value of the cash payments required to repay the royalties to the ASIC designer. In calculating the present value of future royalty payments to the ASIC designer, we used a discount factor of 17.6%, commensurate with our risk at the date of initial recognition of the liability. Any updates in the expected product shipments and the liability will be recorded to profit and loss each period.
As more information is gathered to assist our management in making forecasts, the liability will be updated.
C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.
For a description of our research and development programs and the amounts that we have incurred over the last three years pursuant to those programs, see Item 4B “Information on Our Company-Business Overview-Research and Development.”
D. Trend Information
Our results of operations and financial condition may be affected by various trends and factors discussed in Item 3D “Key Information-Risk factors,” Item 4 “Information on Our Company” and elsewhere in this Item 5 “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
85
E. Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. We base our estimates, judgments and assumptions on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. See Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this Annual Report for a description of the significant accounting policies that we used to prepare our consolidated financial statements.
We believe the following critical policies reflect the more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Share-based compensation
We recognize expense for our share-based compensation based on the fair value of the awards granted. We estimate the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in our consolidated statement of operations.
We recognize compensation expenses for the value of our awards granted based on the graded-vesting method over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
We recognize compensation cost for awards with performance conditions if and when we conclude that it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. We reassess at each reporting period the probability of vesting for awards with performance conditions and adjust compensation cost based on our probability assessment.
We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model for our share-based awards. The option-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which the most significant are the fair market value of the underlying ordinary shares, expected share price volatility and the expected option term. In the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, expected volatility was calculated based upon actual historical stock price movements over the most recent periods ending on the grant date, equal to the expected term of the options.
The expected option term represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected option term is determined based on the simplified method in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110, as adequate historical experience is not available to provide a reasonable estimate.
The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from U.S. treasury bonds with an equivalent term. We have historically not paid dividends and have no foreseeable plans to pay dividends.
Equity
In the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we completed certain financing transactions in which we issued ordinary shares and warrants. The warrants are immediately exercisable at a fixed exercise price per ordinary share, subject to certain adjustments and will expire on the expiring date as determined in the applicable warrant. The warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis if at the time of exercise thereof, there is no effective registration statement registering the ordinary shares underlying the warrants. We analyzed the terms of the warrants and concluded that the terms of the warrants did not include features that would preclude equity classification. Therefore, we classified the warrants as equity.
In September 2025, we entered into the Parea APA, pursuant to which we acquired exclusive Ghost Kitchen area representative rights in New Jersey in exchange for the issuance of 1,169,596 ordinary shares. In December 2025, we entered into the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which ARC committed to purchase up to $30.0 million of our ordinary shares, subject to certain limitations and conditions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this Annual Report for a description of the recent accounting policies.
86
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A. Directors and senior management
The following table sets forth information for our executive officers and directors as of April 27, 2026. Unless otherwise stated, the address for our directors and executive officers is c/o Check-Cap Ltd., 29 Abba Hushi Avenue, P.O. Box 1271, Isfiya, 3009000, Israel.
| Name(1) | Age | Position(s) | ||
| David Lontini | 45 | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||
| Alan Lewis | 51 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Carlos Cheung | 35 | Director | ||
| Michael Hutton | 54 | Director | ||
| Daniel Kokiw | 53 | Director |
Executive Officers and Directors
Alan Lewis
Alan Lewis has served as our Chief Financial Officer since April 6, 2025. Mr. Lewis is a digital transformation leader and Co-Founder/Global Chief Strategy Officer of The Aeon Group, Inc. He serves concurrently as Chief Financial Officer of INVENT Ventures, helping guide the technology startup incubator back to “Pink Current” status on the OTC Markets. He leads fund administration services as Managing Member of AeonX. A U.S. Army veteran and EdD candidate in Learning Technology at Pepperdine University, Mr. Lewis merges decades of entrepreneurial, financial, and philanthropic expertise to drive transformative and socially responsible growth.
David Lontini
David Lontini, who has served on our Board of Directors since January 25, 2024, is an experienced business owner / operator who has successfully completed M&A transactions. Mr. Lontini has held senior leadership positions at a variety of sports and media organizations such as Pointstreak Sports Technologies, Maru/Matchbox and the Toronto Argonauts Football Club. Mr. Lontini holds a B.A. in Liberal Arts and Political Science from York University.
Carlos Cheung
Carlos Cheung has served on our Board of Directors since September 2024. Mr. Cheung is a seasoned technology entrepreneur and business leader with a strong background in software development and strategic growth. Since September 2017, Mr. Cheung has been on the founding team of FOSSA, Inc. (“FOSSA”) to build the company from the ground up in enterprise software and cyber security. Prior to FOSSA, Mr. Cheung helped lead other software companies from inception to growth. Mr. Cheung has also played a key role in mergers and acquisitions, particularly in conducting software due diligence, assessing technological assets, evaluating potential risks and opportunities, and guiding strategic decision-making in complex business transactions. Mr. Cheung holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration (BSBA) from Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business. Mr. Cheung’s unique combination of entrepreneurial spirit, technical knowledge, and strategic business acumen positions him as a valuable asset for public company boards, particularly those in the technology sector or companies undergoing digital transformation. Mr. Cheung has been appointed to the Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Audit Committee.
Michael Hutton
Michael Hutton, who has served on our Board of Directors since January 25, 2024, has spent the past 28 years at medical device technology companies and for the last 15 years has held leadership positions at Phonak Canada, of Sonova Holding AG and WSAudiology. In these leadership roles, Mr Hutton gained significant experience with M&A and strategic business development. Mr. Hutton’s education includes studying at the Toronto School of Business and the University of St. Gallen. Mr. Hutton has been appointed to the Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Audit Committee.
87
Daniel Kokiw
Daniel Kokiw, who has served on our Board of Directors since January 25, 2024, is an experienced business owner / operator who has successfully completed M&A transactions. For over 8 years, Mr Kokiw was in a senior operational role at Zodiac Recreational of North America, of Zodiac Nautic and prior to that he ran the operations of Rokan Laminating. Currently, Mr Kokiw owns and operates a highly successful business in food retail. Mr. Kokiw’s education includes studying Psychology at Carlton University. Mr. Kokiw has been appointed to the Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Audit Committee.
Arrangements Concerning Election of Directors; Family Relationships
We are not a party to, and are not aware of, any voting agreements among our shareholders. In addition, there are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors.
B. Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers
The aggregate compensation paid and share-based compensation and other payments expensed by us to our directors and executive officers with respect to the year ended December 31, 2025 was $0.2 million. At our 2023 annual general meeting held on December 18, 2023, our shareholders approved, following the approval of our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, the payment to each of our directors of the following fees: (i) an annual fee of $25,000 for service on the Board of Directors and $2,500 for service on the Audit Committee; and (ii) a per meeting fee of $850 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof attended in person or via telephone or any resolution approved by written consent. In addition, our shareholders approved an annual fee of (i) $10,000 for service as Chairman of the Board of Directors (other than an Active Chairman, who may be entitled to an increased fee in accordance with our Compensation Policy) and (ii) $5,000 for service as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Our directors also benefit from directors’ and officers’ indemnification and exculpation agreements as well as from our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy. The directors are also entitled to reimbursement of expenses (including travel, stay and lodging), subject to the Israeli Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and in accordance with our company practices and our Compensation Policy for Executive Officers and Directors, or the Compensation Policy. The foregoing fees are the same annual and per meeting fees that have been paid to our directors since our 2017 annual general meeting.
The directors are also entitled to reimbursement of expenses (including travel, stay and lodging), subject to the Israeli Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and in accordance with our company practices and our Compensation Policy for Executive Officers and Directors, or the Compensation Policy.
We do not have any written agreements with any current director providing for benefits upon the termination of such director’s relationship with us.
To our knowledge, there are no agreements and arrangements between any director and any third party relating to compensation or other payment in connection with their candidacy or service on our Board of Directors.
Employment Agreements with Covered Executives
We have entered into written agreements with Alan Lewis relating to their employment.
In connection with Mr. Lewis’ appointment as Chief Financial Officer, we entered into a Services Agreement by and between Check-Cap and Mr. Lewis (the “Services Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Services Agreement, we will pay Mr. Lewis a monthly fee in an amount equal to US$12,000 in consideration of his services.
C. Board Practices
Board of Directors
Under the Israeli Companies Law, the management of our business, including strategy and policies, is vested in our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may exercise all powers and may take all actions that are not specifically granted to our shareholders or to management. Our executive officers are responsible for our day-to-day management and have individual responsibilities established by our Board of Directors. Our chief executive officer is appointed by, and serves at the discretion of, our Board of Directors, subject to the employment agreement that we have entered into with him. All other executive officers are appointed by our chief executive officer, and are subject to the terms of any applicable employment agreements that we may enter into with them.
Under our amended articles of association, our Board of Directors must consist of at least four and not more than eleven directors, including the external directors (if external directors serve on the Board of Directors).
Our Board of Directors currently consists of four members, each of whom satisfy the independence requirements of the Nasdaq Listing Rules, such that we comply with the Nasdaq Listing Rule that requires that a majority of our Board of Directors be comprised of independent directors, within the meaning of Nasdaq Listing Rules.
88
On July 18, 2025, we appointed Mr. David Lontini to serve as the Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In connection with such appointment, Mr. Lontini ceased serving as a member of the Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee of the Board but remains a director of the Company and the chair of the Board.
Our directors are elected by the general meeting of our shareholders by the vote of a majority of the ordinary shares present, in person or by proxy, and voting at that meeting. Each director will hold office until the first annual general meeting of shareholders following his or her appointment, unless the tenure of such director expires earlier pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law or unless he or she is removed from office as described below. In addition, our amended articles of association allow our Board of Directors to appoint directors (other than the external directors) to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors, for a term of office equal to the remaining period of the term of office of the director(s) whose office(s) have been vacated.
Our Board of Directors elected to rely on the exemption available to foreign private issuers under the Nasdaq Listing Rules and follow Israeli law and practice with regard to the process of nominating directors, in accordance with which the board of directors (or a committee thereof) is authorized to recommend to the shareholders director nominees for election (other than directors elected by the board of directors to fill a vacancy). Our Board of Directors established a Nominating Committee, whose role is to select and recommend to the Board of Directors for selection, director nominees, while considering the appropriate size and composition of the Board of Directors, the requirements of applicable law regarding service as a member of our Board of Directors and the criteria for the selection of new members of the Board of Directors, and determined that our Nominating Committee need not be composed solely of independent directors (within the meaning of Nasdaq Listing Rules). However, our Nominating Committee currently consists solely of independent directors.
Under the Israeli Companies Law and our amended articles of association, nominations for directors may also be added to the agenda of a future general meeting of shareholders, at the request of any one or more shareholders holding at least 1% of our outstanding voting power. Any director nominated by a shareholder is required to certify to us, as required by all director nominees, that he or she meets all the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law for election as a director of a public company, and possesses the necessary qualifications and is able to dedicate sufficient time, to fulfill his or her duties as a director of our company, taking into consideration our company’s size and special needs.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, our Board of Directors must determine the minimum number of directors who are required to have accounting and financial expertise (as defined in regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law). In determining the number of directors required to have such expertise, our Board of Directors must consider, among other things, the type and size of the company and the scope and complexity of its operations. Our Board of Directors has determined that the minimum number of directors of our company who are required to have accounting and financial expertise is one.
External Directors
Under the Israeli Companies Law, companies incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel that are “public companies,” must appoint at least two external directors who meet the qualification requirements in the Companies Law.
However, pursuant to regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law, Israeli companies whose shares are listed on certain stock exchanges outside of Israel (including the Nasdaq Capital Market) with no controlling shareholder (within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law), such as ourselves, that satisfy the requirements of the laws in the foreign jurisdiction where the company’s shares are listed, as they apply to companies incorporated in such jurisdiction, with respect to the appointment of independent directors and the composition of the audit committee and compensation committee, may elect to exempt themselves from the requirements of Israeli law with respect to (i) the requirement to appoint outside directors and that one outside director serve on each committee of the board of directors authorized to exercise any of the powers of the board of directors; (ii) certain limitations on the employment or service of an outside director or his or her spouse, children or other relatives, following the cessation of the service as an outside director, by or for the company, its controlling shareholder or an entity controlled by the controlling shareholder; (iii) the composition, meetings and quorum of the audit committee; and (iv) the composition and meetings of the compensation committee. If a company has elected to avail itself from the requirement to appoint external directors and at the time a director is appointed all members of the board of directors are of the same gender, a director of the other gender must be appointed.
89
Following analysis of our qualification to rely on the exemption, our Board of Directors determined to adopt the exemption, subject to and effective as of the approval by our shareholders of a certain amendment to our articles of association, which was obtained at our 2017 annual general meeting held on June 22, 2017. If in the future we were to have a controlling shareholder, we would again be required to comply with the requirements relating to external directors and the composition of the audit committee and compensation committee under Israeli law.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee is currently comprised of Michael Hutton, Daniel Kokiw, and Carlos Cheung. Michael Hutton serves as the Chairman of the audit committee.
Composition of the Audit Committee
In accordance with regulations promulgated under the Companies Law described above, we elected to “opt out” from the Israeli Companies Law requirement to appoint external directors and related rules concerning the composition of the audit committee and compensation committee. Under such exemption, among other things, the composition of our audit committee must comply with the requirements of SEC and Nasdaq rules.
Under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, we are required to maintain an audit committee consisting of at least three independent directors, within the meaning of the Exchange Act and Nasdaq Listing Rules, each of whom must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including the company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement (and one of whom has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting or other comparable experience or background that leads to financial sophistication) and none of whom has participated in the preparation of our or any of our subsidiary’s financial statements at any time during the prior three years.
All members of our audit committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Listing Rules. Our Board of Directors has determined that Michael Hutton is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and has the requisite financial sophistication required by the Nasdaq Listing Rules.
Each of the members of the audit committee qualifies as an “independent director” within the meaning of Nasdaq Listing Rules and is “independent” as such term is defined in Rule 10A- 3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which is different from the general Nasdaq test for independence of board and committee members.
Audit Committee Role
Our Board of Directors adopted an audit committee charter, which became effective upon the listing of our securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market, as subsequently amended, which sets forth the responsibilities of the audit committee consistent with the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Listing Rules, as well as the requirements for audit committees under the Israeli Companies Law, including the following:
| ● | oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm and recommending the engagement, compensation or termination of engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm to the Board of Directors or shareholders for their approval, as applicable, in accordance with the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law; |
| ● | recommending the engagement or termination of the person filling the office of our internal auditor; and |
| ● | recommending the terms of audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm for pre-approval by our Board of Directors or shareholders for their approval, as applicable, in accordance with the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law. |
Our audit committee provides assistance to our Board of Directors in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions by pre-approving the services performed by our independent accountants and reviewing their reports regarding our accounting practices and systems of internal control over financial reporting. Our audit committee also oversees the audit efforts of our independent accountants and takes those actions that it deems necessary to satisfy itself that the accountants are independent of management.
90
Under the Israeli Companies Law, our audit committee is responsible for:
| ● | determining whether there are deficiencies in the business management practices of our company, including in consultation with our internal auditor or the independent auditor, and making recommendations to the Board of Directors to improve such practices; |
| ● | determining whether to approve certain related party transactions (including transactions in which an office holder has a personal interest) and whether such transaction is extraordinary or material under Israeli Companies Law (see “- Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law”); |
| ● | determining whether a competitive process must be implemented for the approval of certain transactions with controlling shareholders or its relative or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest (whether or not the transaction is an extraordinary transaction), under the supervision of the audit committee or other party determined by the audit committee and in accordance with standards to be determined by the audit committee, or whether a different process determined by the audit committee should be implemented for the approval of such transactions; |
| ● | determining the process for the approval of certain transactions with controlling shareholders or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest that the audit committee has determined are not extraordinary transactions but are not immaterial transactions; |
| ● | where the Board of Directors approves the working plan of the internal auditor, to examine such working plan before its submission to the Board of Directors and proposing amendments thereto; |
| ● | examining our internal controls and internal auditor’s performance, including whether the internal auditor has sufficient resources and tools to dispose of its responsibilities; |
| ● | examining the scope of our auditor’s work and compensation and submitting a recommendation with respect thereto to our Board of Directors or shareholders, depending on which of them is considering the compensation of our auditor; and |
| ● | establishing procedures for the handling of employees’ complaints as to the management of our business and the protection to be provided to such employees. |
Compensation Committee and Compensation Policy
Our compensation committee is currently comprised of Michael Hutton, Daniel Kokiw, and Carlos Cheung. Mr. Kokiw serves as the Chairman of the compensation committee.
Composition of the Compensation Committee
In accordance with regulations promulgated under the Companies Law described above, we elected to “opt out” from the Israeli Companies Law requirement to appoint external directors and related rules concerning the composition of the audit committee and compensation committee.
Under the Nasdaq Listing Rules, we are required to maintain a compensation committee consisting of at least two directors, each of whom is an independent director within the meaning of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. Our compensation committee currently complies with the provisions of Nasdaq Listing Rules relating to composition requirements.
91
Compensation Committee Role
Our Board of Directors adopted a compensation committee charter, which became effective upon the listing of our shares on the Nasdaq Capital Market, as subsequently amended, which sets forth the responsibilities of the compensation committee consistent with the Nasdaq Listing Rules and the requirements for compensation committees under the Israeli Companies Law, including the following:
| ● | recommending to the Board of Directors for its approval (i) a compensation policy; (ii) whether a compensation policy should continue in effect, if the then-current policy has a term of greater than three years (approval of either a new compensation policy or the continuation of an existing compensation policy must in any case occur every three years); and (iii) periodic updates to the compensation policy. See “- Compensation Committee and Compensation Policy.” In addition, the compensation committee is required to periodically examine the implementation of the compensation policy; |
| ● | the approval of the terms of employment and service of office holders (including determining whether the compensation terms of a candidate for chief executive officer of the company need not be brought to approval of the shareholders); and |
| ● | reviewing and approving grants of options and other incentive awards to persons other than office holders to the extent such authority is delegated by our Board of Directors, subject to the limitations on such delegation as provided in the Israeli Companies Law. |
Compensation Policy
Under the Israeli Companies Law, the duties of the compensation committee include the recommendation to the company’s board of directors of a policy regarding the terms of engagement of office holders, as such term is defined in the Israeli Companies Law, to which we refer to as a compensation policy, and any extensions and updates thereto. The compensation policy must be approved at least once every three years, first, by our Board of Directors, upon recommendation of our compensation committee, and second, by the shareholders by the Special Approval for Compensation (as defined below under “- Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law - Disclosure of Personal Interests of an Office Holder and Approval of Certain Transactions”).
Our current Compensation Policy for Executive Officers and Directors, which was approved by our shareholders at the 2023 annual general meeting held on December 18, 2023, serves as the basis for decisions concerning the financial terms of employment or engagement of our office holders, including exculpation, insurance, indemnification and any benefit, monetary payment or obligation of payment in respect of employment or engagement, including and any severance payment or benefit.
The Compensation Policy must be determined and later reevaluated according to certain factors, including: (i) the advancement of a company’s objectives, business plan and its long- term strategy; (ii) the creation of appropriate incentives for executives, while considering (among other things) the company’s risk management policy; (iii) the size and the nature of the company’s operations; and (iv) with respect to variable compensation, the contribution of the office holder towards the achievement of the company’s long-term goals and the maximization of its profits, all with a long-term objective and in accordance with the position of the office holder.
In accordance with the Israeli Companies law, our Compensation Policy refers to the following factors:
| ● | the knowledge, skills, expertise, professional experience and accomplishments of the relevant office holder; |
| ● | the office holder’s roles and responsibilities and prior compensation agreements with him or her; |
| ● | with respect to variable compensation - the possibility of reducing variable compensation at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and the possibility of setting a limit on the exercise value of non-cash variable equity-based compensation; and |
| ● | with respect to severance compensation, the period of employment or service of the office holder, the terms of his or her compensation during such period, the company’s performance during such period, the person’s contribution towards the company’s achievement of its goals and the maximization of its profits, and the circumstances under which the person is leaving the company. |
92
In addition, in according with the Israeli Companies Law, our Compensation Policy includes the following principles:
| ● | the link between variable compensation (e.g., bonuses) and long-term performance and measurable criteria (i.e., variable compensation must be determined based on long-term performance and measurable criteria). Only “non-material” portion of variable compensation may be determined based on criteria that is not measurable, taking into account office holders’ contribution to the company; |
| ● | the ratio of variable to fixed compensation, and the ceiling for the value of variable compensation, which is determined at the time of payment, except that the ceiling for equity-based compensation is determined at the time of grant; |
| ● | the conditions under which an office holder would be required to repay compensation paid to him or her if it was later shown that the data upon which such compensation was based was inaccurate and was required to be restated in the company’s financial statements; |
| ● | the minimum holding or vesting period for variable, equity-based compensation, while taking into account long-term objectives; and |
| ● | maximum limits for severance compensation. |
Nominating Committee
Our Board of Directors has established a Nominating Committee, whose role is to select and recommend to the Board of Directors for selection, director nominees, while considering the appropriate size and composition of the Board of Directors, the requirements of applicable law regarding service as a member of our Board of Directors and the criteria for the selection of new members of the Board of Directors. While our Board of Directors elected to rely on the exemption available to foreign private issuers under the Nasdaq Listing Rules with respect to the process of nominating directors and determined that our Nominating Committee need not be composed solely of independent directors (within the meaning of Nasdaq Listing Rules), our Nominating Committee currently consists solely of independent directors. The Nominating Committee is currently comprised of the following directors: Michael Hutton, Daniel Kokiw, and Carlos Cheung. Daniel Kokiw serves as the Chairman of the Nominating Committee.
Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law
Fiduciary Duties of Directors and Executive Officers
The Israeli Companies Law codifies the fiduciary duties that office holders owe to a company. Each person listed in the table under “Management-Executive Officers and Directors” is an office holder under the Israeli Companies Law.
An office holder’s fiduciary duties consist of a duty of care and a duty of loyalty. The duty of care requires an office holder to act with the level of care with which a reasonable office holder in the same position would have acted under the same circumstances. The duty of care includes a duty to use reasonable means to obtain:
| ● | information on the advisability of a given action brought for his or her approval or performed by virtue of his or her position; and |
| ● | all other important information pertaining to any such action. |
The duty of loyalty requires an office holder to act in good faith and in the best interests of the company, and includes, among other things, the duty to:
| ● | refrain from any conflict of interest between the performance of his or her duties to the company and his or her other duties or personal affairs; |
| ● | refrain from any activity that is competitive with the company; |
| ● | refrain from exploiting any business opportunity of the company to receive a personal gain for himself or herself or others; and |
| ● | disclose to the company any information or documents relating to the company’s affairs which the office holder received as a result of his or her position as an office holder. |
We may approve an act specified above which would otherwise constitute a breach of the office holder’s duty of loyalty, provided that the office holder acted in good faith, the act or its approval does not harm the company and the office holder discloses his or her personal interest a sufficient amount of time before the date for discussion of approval of such act.
93
Disclosure of Personal Interests of an Office Holder and Approval of Certain Transactions
Disclosure of Personal Interests of an Office Holder
The Israeli Companies Law requires that an office holder promptly disclose to the company any “personal interest” that he or she may be aware of and all related material information or documents concerning any existing or proposed transaction with the company. An interested office holder’s disclosure must be made promptly and in any event no later than the first meeting of the board of directors at which the transaction is considered. A personal interest includes an interest of any person in an act or transaction of a company, including a personal interest of such person’s relative or of a corporate entity in which such person or a relative of such person holds 5% or more of the outstanding shares or voting rights, is a director or general manager or in which he or she has the right to appoint at least one director or the general manager, but excluding a personal interest arising from one’s ownership of shares in the company. A personal interest includes the personal interest of a person for whom the office holder holds a voting proxy or the personal interest of the office holder with respect to his or her vote on behalf of a person for whom he or she holds a proxy even if such shareholder has no personal interest in the matter. An office holder is not, however, obliged to disclose a personal interest if it derives solely from the personal interest of his or her relative in a transaction that is not considered an extraordinary transaction. Under the Israeli Companies Law, an extraordinary transaction is defined as any of the following: a transaction other than in the ordinary course of business; a transaction that is not on market terms; or a transaction that may have a material impact on a company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.
Generally, a person who has a personal interest in a matter which is considered at a meeting of the board of directors or the audit committee shall not be present at such a meeting or vote on that matter unless, with respect to an office holder, the chairman of the audit committee or board of directors (as applicable) determines that the office holder should be present during the discussions in order to present the transaction that is subject to approval (provided that the office holder may not vote on the matter). If a majority of the members of the audit committee or the board of directors (as applicable) has a personal interest in the approval of a transaction, then all directors may participate in discussions of the audit committee or the board of directors (as applicable) on such transaction and the voting on approval thereof. If a majority of the members of the board of directors has a personal interest in the approval of a transaction, shareholder approval is also required for such transaction.
Approval of Transactions with Officer Holders
If it is determined that an office holder has a personal interest in a transaction that is not an extraordinary transaction, approval by the board of directors is required for the transaction, unless the company’s articles of association provide for a different method of approval. Further, so long as an office holder has disclosed his or her personal interest in a transaction, the board of directors may approve an act by the office holder that would otherwise be deemed a breach of his or her duty of loyalty, provided that the transaction is in the company’s best interest and the office holder acted in good faith. An extraordinary transaction in which an office holder has a personal interest requires approval first by the company’s audit committee and subsequently by the board of directors.
Compensation of Officers Other than the Chief Executive Officer
The compensation of an office holder (other than the chief executive officer) who is not a director generally requires approval first by the company’s compensation committee, then by the company’s board of directors, according to the company’s compensation policy. In special circumstances the compensation committee and board of directors may approve a compensation arrangement that is inconsistent with the company’s compensation policy, provided that they have considered the same considerations and matters required for the approval of a compensation policy in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and such arrangement must be approved by a majority vote of the shares present and voting at a shareholders meeting on the matter, provided that either: (i) such majority includes at least a majority of the shares held by all shareholders who are not controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in such compensation arrangement present and voting on the matter, excluding abstentions; or (ii) the total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the matter and who vote against the matter does not exceed 2% of the company’s aggregate voting rights. We refer to this as the Special Approval for Compensation. However, if the shareholders of the company do not approve a compensation arrangement with an executive officer that is inconsistent with the company’s compensation policy, the compensation committee and board of directors may, in special circumstances, override the shareholders’ decision if each of the compensation committee and the board of directors discuss the arrangement again, analyze the shareholders’ objection and provide detailed reasons for their decision.
94
An amendment to an existing arrangement with an office holder (other than the chief executive officer) who is not a director requires only the approval of the compensation committee, if the compensation committee determines that the amendment is not material in comparison to the existing arrangement. However, according to regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law, an amendment to an existing arrangement with an office holder (who is not a director) who is subordinate to the chief executive officer shall not require the approval of the compensation committee, if (i) the amendment is approved by the chief executive officer and the company’s compensation policy determines that a non-material amendment to the terms of service of an office holder (other than the chief executive officer) may be approved by the chief executive officer and (ii) the engagement terms are consistent with the company’s compensation policy.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer
The compensation of a public company’s chief executive officer generally requires the approval of first, the company’s compensation committee; second, the company’s board of directors and third (except for a number of exceptions), the company’s shareholders by the Special Approval for Compensation. However, if the shareholders of the company do not approve a compensation arrangement with a chief executive officer, the compensation committee and board of directors may, in special circumstances, override the shareholders’ decision if each of the compensation committee and the board of directors discuss the arrangement again, analyze the shareholders’ objection and provide detailed reasons for their decision. However, an amendment to an existing arrangement with a chief executive officer who is not a director requires only the approval of the compensation committee, if the compensation committee determines that the amendment is not material in comparison to the existing arrangement.
According to regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law, the renewal or extension of an existing arrangement with a chief executive officer shall not require shareholder approval if (i) the renewal or extension is not beneficial to the chief executive officer as compared to the prior arrangement or there is no substantial change in the terms and other relevant circumstances; and (ii) the engagement terms are consistent with the company’s compensation policy and the prior arrangement was approved by the shareholders by the Special Approval for Compensation.
Compensation of Directors
Arrangements regarding the compensation of a director require the approval of the compensation committee, board of directors and (except for a number of exceptions) shareholders by ordinary majority, in that order. The approval of the compensation committee and board of directors must be in accordance with the compensation policy. In special circumstances, the compensation committee and board of directors may approve a compensation arrangement that is inconsistent with the company’s compensation policy, provided that they have considered the same considerations and matters required for the approval of a compensation policy in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and that shareholder approval was obtained by the Special Approval for Compensation.
With respect to compensation of an officer (including chief executive officer) or director who is also a controlling shareholder, see “- Disclosure of Personal Interests of Controlling Shareholders and Approval of Certain Transactions.”
Disclosure of Personal Interests of Controlling Shareholders and Approval of Certain Transactions
Pursuant to Israeli law, the disclosure requirements regarding personal interests that apply to directors and executive officers also apply to a controlling shareholder of a public company. In the context of a transaction involving a shareholder of the company, a controlling shareholder also includes a shareholder who holds 25% or more of the voting rights in the company if no other shareholder holds more than 50% of the voting rights in the company. For this purpose, the holdings of all shareholders who have a personal interest in the same transaction will be aggregated. Extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, including a private placement in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, and the terms of engagement with a controlling shareholder or a relative thereof, directly or indirectly (including through a corporation controlled by a controlling shareholder), for the provision of services to the company and his or her terms of employment or service as an office holder or employment as other than an office holder, require the approval of each of (i) the audit committee or the compensation committee with respect to the terms of service or employment by the company as an office holder, an employee or service provider; (ii) the board of directors; and (iii) the shareholders, in that order. The shareholder approval requires one of the following, which we refer to as a Special Majority:
| ● | a majority of the shares held by all shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the transaction and who are present and voting on the matter approves the transaction, excluding abstentions; or |
| ● | the shares voted against the transaction by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and who are present and voting at the meeting do not exceed 2% of the voting rights in the company. |
95
Each shareholder voting on the approval of an extraordinary transaction with a controlling shareholder must inform the company prior to voting whether or not he or she has a personal interest in the approval of the transaction, otherwise, the shareholder is not eligible to vote on the proposal and his or her vote will not be counted for purposes of the proposal.
To the extent that any such transaction with a controlling shareholder is for a period of more than three years, approval is required once every three years, unless, with respect to any such extraordinary transactions, the audit committee determines that the duration of the transaction is reasonable given the related circumstances.
The compensation committee and board approval for arrangements regarding the terms of service or employment of a controlling shareholder must be in accordance with the company’s compensation policy. In special circumstances, the compensation committee and board of directors may approve a compensation arrangement that is inconsistent with the company’s compensation policy, provided that they have considered the same considerations and matters required for the approval of a compensation policy in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law and that shareholder approval was obtained by the Special Majority.
Pursuant to regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law, certain transactions with a controlling shareholder or his or her relative, or with directors, relating to terms of service or employment that would otherwise require approval of a company’s shareholders may be exempt from shareholder approval upon certain determinations of the audit committee and board of directors. In addition, disclosure of a personal interest in a private placement of a public company (including disclosure of any material fact or document) is required by (i) a shareholder holding 5% or more of the company’s issued and outstanding capital or its voting rights whose holdings will increase as result of the private placement and a shareholder who will hold 5% or more of the company’s issued and outstanding capital or its voting rights as a result of the private placement, if 20% or more of the company’s outstanding share capital prior to the private placement is issued in the private placement and the payment for which is not only in cash or listed securities or the transaction is not on market terms; and (ii) a person or entity that will become a controlling shareholder as a result of the private placement.
Shareholder Duties
Pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, a shareholder has a duty to act in good faith and in a customary manner toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing his or her power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at a meeting of shareholder with respect to the following matters:
| ● | an amendment to the company’s articles of association; |
| ● | an increase of the company’s authorized share capital; |
| ● | a merger; and |
| ● | the approval of related party transactions and acts of office holders that require shareholder approval. |
In addition, a shareholder has a general duty to refrain from discriminating against other shareholders.
Certain shareholders have a duty of fairness toward the company. These shareholders include any controlling shareholder, any shareholder who knows that he or she has the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote and any shareholder who has the power to appoint or to prevent the appointment of an office holder of the company or other power towards the company. The Israeli Companies Law does not define the substance of the duty of fairness, except to state that the remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply in the event of a breach of the duty to act with fairness.
96
Exculpation, Insurance and Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Under the Israeli Companies Law, a company may not exculpate an office holder from liability for a breach of the duty of loyalty. An Israeli company may exculpate an office holder in advance from liability to the company, in whole or in part, for damages caused to the company as a result of a breach of duty of care, but only if a provision authorizing such exculpation is included in its articles of association. Our amended articles of association include such a provision, to the fullest extent permitted by law. The company may not exculpate in advance a director from liability arising out of a prohibited dividend or other distribution to shareholders.
Under the Israeli Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law, 5728-1968, or the Israeli Securities Law, a company may indemnify an office holder in respect of the following liabilities and expenses incurred for acts performed by him or her as an office holder, either pursuant to an undertaking made in advance of any such event or following an event, provided its articles of association include a provision authorizing such indemnification:
| ● | a financial liability imposed on him or her in favor of another person pursuant to a judgment, including a settlement or arbitrator’s award approved by a court. However, if an undertaking to indemnify an office holder with respect to such liability is provided in advance, then such an undertaking must be limited to events which, in the opinion of the board of directors, can be foreseen based on the company’s activities when the undertaking to indemnify is given, and to an amount or according to criteria determined by the board of directors as reasonable under the circumstances, and such undertaking shall detail the abovementioned foreseen events and amount or criteria; |
| ● | reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder (1) as a result of an investigation or proceeding instituted against him or her by an authority authorized to conduct such investigation or proceeding, provided that (i) no indictment was filed against such office holder as a result of such investigation or proceeding; and (ii) no financial liability was imposed upon him or her as a substitute for the criminal proceeding as a result of such investigation or proceeding or, if such financial liability was imposed, it was imposed with respect to an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent; and (2) in connection with a monetary sanction; |
| ● | reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder or imposed by a court in proceedings instituted against him or her by the company, on its behalf, or by a third party, or in connection with criminal proceedings in which the office holder was acquitted, or as a result of a conviction for an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent; and |
| ● | expenses, including reasonable litigation expenses and legal fees, incurred by an office holder in relation to an administrative proceeding instituted against such office holder, or certain compensation payments made to an injured party imposed on an office holder by an administrative proceeding, pursuant to certain provisions of the Israeli Securities Law. |
Under the Israeli Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law, a company may insure an office holder against the following liabilities incurred for acts performed by him or her as an office holder if and to the extent provided in the company’s articles of association:
| ● | a breach of the duty of loyalty to the company, provided that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not harm the company; |
| ● | a breach of the duty of care to the company or to a third party, to the extent such a breach arises out of the negligent conduct of the office holder; |
| ● | a financial liability imposed on the office holder in favor of a third party; and |
| ● | expenses, including reasonable litigation expenses and legal fees, incurred by an office holder in relation to an administrative proceeding instituted against such office holder or certain compensation payments to an injured party imposed on an office holder by an administrative proceeding, pursuant to certain provisions of the Securities Law. |
97
Under the Israeli Companies Law, a company may not indemnify, exculpate or enter into an insurance contract for office holder liability, for any of the following:
| ● | a breach of the duty of loyalty, except for indemnification and insurance for a breach of the duty of loyalty to the company to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company; |
| ● | a breach of the duty of care committed intentionally or recklessly, excluding a breach arising out of the negligent conduct of the office holder; |
| ● | an act or omission committed with intent to derive illegal personal benefit; or |
| ● | a fine, monetary sanction or forfeit levied against the office holder. |
Under the Israeli Companies Law, exculpation, indemnification and insurance of office holders in a public company must be approved by the compensation committee and the board of directors and, with respect to the chief executive officer and a director or (under certain circumstances), also by the shareholders. See “- Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law.” However, the insurance of office holders shall not require shareholder approval and may be approved only by the compensation committee, if the engagement terms are determined in the company’s compensation policy and that policy was approved by the shareholders by the Special Approval for Compensation, provided that the policy is on market terms and is not likely to materially impact the company’s profitability, assets or obligations.
Our amended articles of association permit us to exculpate, indemnify and insure our office holders to the fullest extent permitted under the Israeli Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law. We have obtained directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for the benefit of our office holders and intend to continue to maintain such coverage and pay all premiums thereunder to the fullest extent permitted by the Israeli Companies Law.
We have entered into indemnification and exculpation agreements with each of our current officers and directors exculpating them from a breach of their duty of care to us to the fullest extent permitted by the Israeli Companies Law and undertaking to indemnify them to the fullest extent permitted by the Israeli Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law, to the extent that these liabilities are not covered by insurance. This indemnification is limited to events determined as foreseeable by our Board of Directors based on our activities and excludes expenses and liabilities incurred by a breach of the duty of loyalty to the Company, willful neglect of the duty of care towards the Company, realization of personal unlawful profits and other circumstances as set forth in the indemnification agreements. Under such indemnification agreements, the maximum aggregate amount of indemnification that we may pay to any and all of our currently serving or future officers and directors together may not exceed the higher of $5 million and 25% of our shareholders equity according to our most recent financial statements at the time of payment. In the opinion of the SEC, however, indemnification of directors and office holders for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is against public policy and therefore unenforceable.
D. Employees
As of December 31, 2025, we had a limited number of employees and independent contractors. Under Israeli law, we and our employees are subject to protective labor provisions, including the length of the workday, minimum wages for employees, annual leave, sick pay, determination of severance pay and advance notice of termination of employment, as well as procedures for hiring and dismissing employees and equal opportunity and anti-discrimination laws. While none of our employees are party to any collective bargaining agreements, orders issued by the Israeli Ministry of Economy and Industry may make certain industry-wide collective bargaining agreements applicable to us. These agreements affect matters such as the length of the workday and week, recuperation pay, travel expenses and pension rights. We have never experienced labor-related work stoppages and believe that our relationships with our employees are a significant part of our operations and that we maintain a good and positive relationship with our employees.
Israeli law generally requires the payment of severance compensation by employers upon the retirement, death or dismissal of an employee. We fund our ongoing severance obligations by making monthly payments to insurance policies. All of our current employees have agreed that upon termination of their employment, they will be entitled to receive only the amounts accrued in the insurance policies with respect to severance pay. Furthermore, Israeli employees and employers are required to pay predetermined sums to the National Insurance Institute, which is similar to the U.S. Social Security Administration. These amounts also include payments for national health insurance.
In addition, we have various consulting arrangements with experts including in regulatory, research and clinical matters, including with physicians.
98
E. Share Ownership
Share Ownership of Executive Officers and Directors
For information concerning the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares by our executive officers and directors, see the table in Item 7A. “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions-Major shareholders.”
Option and Incentive Plans
In connection with the transfer of all of the business operations and substantially all of the assets of Check-Cap LLC to us in 2009, we assumed the Check-Cap LLC 2006 Unit Option Plan, or the 2006 Plan. On June 23, 2015, our Board of Directors approved and adopted the Check-Cap Ltd. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2015 Israeli Plan, and the Check-Ltd. 2015 United States Sub-Plan to Check-Cap Ltd. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2015 U.S. Sub-Plan. The 2015 Israeli Plan and 2015 U.S. Sub-Plan are referred together as the 2015 Plan. As of such date, we ceased to grant options under the 2006 Plan and all equity-based awards made after such date shall be made under the 2015 Plan. Our shareholders approved the 2015 Plan at an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders held on August 13, 2015.
The primary provisions of the 2006 Plan and 2015 Plan are described below.
2006 Plan
General. The 2006 Plan provided for the grant of options to purchase our ordinary shares to our employees, consultants and service providers. For the purpose of the 2006 Plan: (i) an “employee” means any person, including officers, directors or affiliates who are employed by us or by our affiliates; (ii) a “consultant” means any person who is engaged by us to render consulting or advisory services to us or to any of our entities provided that such services are provided in good faith and are (a) not in connection with the offer or sale of our securities in a capital raising transaction and (b) not directly or indirectly promoting or maintaining a market for our securities; (iii) a “service provider” means an employee, director, supplier or officer holder as defined in the Israeli Companies Law; and (iv) an “affiliate” means any entity which is directly or indirectly our parent or subsidiary.
Administration of the 2006 Plan. Our Board of Directors has had the authority to administer the 2006 Plan and to grant options under the 2006 Plan, including, the authority to determine the persons to whom options would be granted, the number of shares subject to each option, the time or times at which the options would be granted, restrictions on the transferability of the options, and the schedule and conditions on which such options may be exercised.
Awards under the 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan provided for the grant of options pursuant to Sections 102 and 3(i) of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance New Version, 5721-1961, which we refer to as the Tax Ordinance. The 2006 Plan provides that Section 102 options may be granted only to employees who are Israeli residents and who do not own interests possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our equity or the equity of our affiliates immediately before such option is granted. Options granted to optionees who are Israeli residents that are not intended to qualify as Section 102 Options are granted under Section 3(i) of the Tax Ordinance, which does not provide for similar tax benefits, and are referred to as Section 3(i) options. The 2006 Plan was submitted for the approval of the Israeli Tax Authority, which we refer to as the ITA, as required by applicable law. Options granted to employees under the 2006 Plan were granted under Section 102(b)(2) of the Tax Ordinance, which permits the issuance to a trustee under the “capital gains track.” In order to comply with the terms of the capital gains track, all options granted under a specific plan and subject to the provisions of Section 102 of the Tax Ordinance, as well as the shares issued upon exercise of such options and other shares received subsequently following any realization of rights with respect to such options, such as share dividends and share splits, must be registered in the name of a trustee selected by the Board of Directors and held in trust for the benefit of the relevant employee, director or officer for a period of two years from the date of the grant. However, under this track, we are not allowed to deduct an expense with respect to the issuance of the options or shares.
Exercise Price; Vesting. The exercise price of an option granted under the 2006 Plan has been determined by the Board of Directors or a committee appointed by it. The first option grant to an employee generally vested over a period of three years and nine months commencing on the date of grant, such that 8.33% vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant and an additional 8.33% vest on each subsequent three-month period thereafter, for 33 months. Additional options granted to an employee generally vest over a period of three years commencing on the three months anniversary of the date of grant, such that 8.33% is fully vested on the date of grant and an additional 8.33% vest on each subsequent three-month period thereafter, for 33 months.
99
Options Term; Termination of Employment or Service. Options granted under the 2006 Plan generally expire within ten years of the grant date or upon the earlier termination of employment of, or services provided by, the optionee, as applicable, subject to the extended period of exercisability upon termination of employment or services, as applicable. Upon termination of the employment of or services rendered by an optionee, as applicable (other than for cause, disability or death), generally vested options may be exercised within three months after the date of such termination or within such shorter time period (not to be less than 30 days) or such longer time period (not to exceed five years) as our Board of Directors or a committee appointed by it shall determine, but in any event no later than the expiration date of the options. If the employment or services of the optionee are terminated because of death or disability (or if the optionee dies within three months after termination of employment or services other than for cause), the optionee’s options may be exercised by the optionee or the optionee’s legal representative or authorized assignee to the extent exercisable on the date of such termination or within 12 months thereafter or as otherwise determined by the Board of Directors or a committee appointed by it. If the employment or services of the optionee are terminated for cause, all outstanding options will, to the extent not previously exercised, be of no force and effect as of the date of termination, unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors or a committee appointed by it.
M&A Transaction. The 2006 Plan provides that in the event of a merger or consolidation of our company in which our company is not the surviving entity, an acquisition of all or substantially all of the outstanding capital of our company or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, the optionee shall be provided the opportunity to (i) exercise his or her options in connection with the transaction and to receive in the transaction such consideration as the holder of ordinary shares shall receive in the transaction; or (ii) retain his or her options or receive a substitute option from the surviving company, if any.
2015 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards under the 2015 Plan. Awards under the 2015 Plan may be options granted pursuant to Section 102 of the Tax Ordinance, or Section 102 Options, or Section 3(i) of the Tax Ordinance, or Section 3(i) Options, “incentive stock options”, or ISOs, within the meaning of Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and options not intended to qualify as ISOs, or Non-statutory Stock Options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock awards, or RSAs, and restricted stock units, or RSUs, or any combination of the foregoing.
Unless the Administrator (as defined below) determines otherwise and subject to applicable law, Section 102 Options may be granted only to Israeli employees, executives and directors (excluding controlling shareholders) and Section 3(i) Options may be granted to consultants, controlling shareholders and non-Israeli employees, executives and directors, in each case of our company or any subsidiary. The Section 102 Options may be granted either pursuant to Section 102(c) of the Tax Ordinance, which are not required to be held in trust by a trustee, or pursuant to Section 102(b), which are required to be held in trust for a specified period to qualify for certain tax benefits. Options granted pursuant to Section 102(b) shall be designated to qualify for capital gain tax treatment in accordance with Section 102(b)(2) of the Tax Ordinance or ordinary income tax in accordance with Section 102(b)(1) of the Tax Ordinance and thereafter, only such type of Section 102(b) options shall be granted until the Administrator has determined otherwise in accordance with applicable law (which may not be prior to one year after the first grant of such type of Section 102(b) options).
Unless the Administrator determines otherwise and subject to applicable law, ISOs may be granted only to non-Israeli employees and Non-statutory Stock Options may be granted to non- Israeli employees and consultants, in each case of our company or any subsidiary. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of the ordinary shares with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by a participant during any calendar year under all company plans exceeds $100,000, then unless the Administrator determines otherwise at any time and subject to applicable law, such options shall be treated as Non-statutory Stock Options.
100
Administration of the 2015 Plan. The Plan 2015 will be administered by the Board of Directors or, subject to applicable law, a committee appointed by the Board of Directors, or Committee and the Administrator. Subject to the provisions of the 2015 Plan and, in the case of a Committee, the specific duties delegated by the Board of Directors, and subject to the approval of any relevant authorities and compliance with all applicable laws, the Administrator shall have the full power and authority at its sole discretion, from time to time and at any time, among other things:
| ● | To determine whether and to what extent awards are to be granted to participants under the 2015 Plan and to select the eligible recipients of awards under the 2015 Plan; |
| ● | To approve forms of agreement for use under the 2015 Plan; |
| ● | To determine the terms and conditions of any award under the 2015 Plan, including the exercise price, the time or times and the extent to which the awards may be exercised (which may be based on performance criteria), any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, and any restriction or limitation regarding any award or the ordinary shares relating thereto, based in each case on such factors as the Administrator, at its sole discretion, shall determine; |
| ● | To determine the fair market value of the shares covered by each award; |
| ● | To make an election as to the type of Section 102 Option; |
| ● | To prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the 2015 Plan, including rules and regulations relating to sub-plans established for the purpose of qualifying for preferred tax treatment under foreign tax laws; |
| ● | To authorize conversion or substitution under the 2015 Plan of any or all awards and to cancel or suspend awards, as necessary, provided the material interests of the participants are not harmed; |
| ● | To construe and interpret the terms of the 2015 Plan and awards granted pursuant to the 2015 Plan; and |
| ● | To alter, revise or otherwise adjust the terms of the 2015 Plan and the award agreement, as may be required pursuant to any applicable laws of local or foreign jurisdictions. |
Term of Awards. The term of each option shall be stated in the award agreement but in no event may it be more than ten years from the date of grant. Unless the Administrator determines otherwise and subject to applicable law, no ISO may be granted under the 2015 Plan to a grantee who possess more than 10% of the total combined voting power of our company or any of our affiliate (a “10% Shareholder”) unless the option terminates on a date that is not later than the day preceding the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable award agreement, the term of a SAR will be ten years.
Exercise Price. The exercise price of any award under the 2015 Plan shall be determined by the Administrator, subject to applicable law. Unless the Administrator determines otherwise and subject to applicable law, in the case of ISOs and Non-Statutory Stock Options, the exercise price per share shall be no less than the fair market value per ordinary share on the date of grant and in the case of an ISO granted to a 10% Shareholder, no less than 110% of the fair market value per ordinary share on the date of grant.
Non-Transferability of Awards. Unless the Administrator determines otherwise and subject to applicable law: (i) options and SARs may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the participant, only by the participant. For as long as options or shares purchased upon the exercise of options are held by a trustee on behalf of the participant, all rights of the participant with respect to such options and shares shall be personal, and may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or mortgaged, other than by will or laws of descent and distribution; (ii) RSUs may not be sold, pledged, transferred, assigned or encumbered; and (iii) RSAs may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise disposed of during the restricted period, provided that the Administrator may provide for the lapse of such restrictions in installments and may accelerate or waive such restrictions in whole or in part.
101
Termination of Employment or Service.
Options and SARs. If a participant ceases to be an employee or consultant, in the absence of specified period in the award agreement and unless the Administrator determines otherwise, such participant may exercise his/her options (to the extent vested on the date of such termination) or SARs within three months following such termination (but in no event later than the expiration date of the option or SAR). If a participant retires, he/she may continue to enjoy such rights with respect to awards under the 2015 Plan, on such terms and conditions as the Administrator may determine. If the participant’s employment or service is terminated as a result if his/her death or permanent disability, the participant (or, if the participant died, the participant’s estate or any person who acquired the right to exercise the option by bequest or inheritance), may exercise his/her options (to the extent vested on the date of such termination) and/or SARs within such additional period of time following such termination as specified in the award agreement (which may not be less than six months), or in the absence of a specified period in the award agreement, until 12 months following such termination or any longer period determined by the Administrator, but in no event later than the expiration date of the option or SAR.
RSAs. If a participant’s service of employment is terminated prior to the restricted period, subject to the terms of the award agreement or as otherwise determined by the Administrator, the participant’s restricted stock and any associated dividends that remain subject to forfeiture will then be forfeited automatically.
RSUs. If a participant’s service of employment is terminated prior to the RSU vesting, subject to the terms of the award agreement or as otherwise determined by the Administrator, the participant’s RSUs that remain subject to forfeiture will then be forfeited automatically.
M&A Transaction. In the event of a Transaction (as defined in the 2015 Plan, which generally includes (among other things) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets or shares, a merger, consolidation or amalgamation with or into another company or a scheme of arrangement for effecting any of the foregoing or such other transaction determined as such by the Administrator, all subject to the conditions and limitations in the 2015 Plan), unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, any award granted under the 2015 shall be assumed or substituted by us or the successor company, under terms determined by the Administrator or the terms of the 2015 Plan applied by the successor company to such assumed or substituted awards, all in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Plan. Regardless of whether or not the awards are assumed or substituted, the Administrator may, at its sole discretion, among other things, provide for the exercise of any exercisable and vested awards, the cancellation of unexercised and unvested awards, the acceleration of unvested awards, or the cancellation of awards for payment in cash, shares or other property of our company or the acquiring company or other party to the Transaction, under such terms as the Administrator may determine, all in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Plan.
Term and Termination of the 2015 Plan. The 2015 Plan became effective upon its adoption by our Board of Directors and shall continue in effect for a term of ten years. Our Board of Directors may at any time amend, alter, suspend or terminate the 2015 Plan. No amendment, alteration, suspension or termination of the 2015 Plan shall impair the rights of any participant, unless mutually agreed otherwise in writing between the participant and the Administrator.
F. Disclosure of a registrant’s action to recover erroneously awarded compensation.
Not applicable.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A. Major shareholders
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding ordinary shares as of March 1, 2026, by each person who we know beneficially owns 5.0% or more of the outstanding ordinary shares. Each of our shareholders has identical voting rights with respect to its shares. All of the information with respect to beneficial ownership of the ordinary shares is given to the best of our knowledge.
The percentage of beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares is based on 7,020,502 ordinary shares, NIS 48.00 par value per share, outstanding as of January 31, 2026. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting power or investment power with respect to securities. All ordinary shares subject to options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2026, and underlying RSUs that are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 1, 2026, are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the shareholder holding such options, warrants or RSUs for the purpose of computing the number of shares beneficially owned by such shareholder. Such shares are also deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding the option, warrant or RSU. They are not, however, deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other shareholder.
102
Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, we believe that the shareholders named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown to be beneficially owned by them, based on information provided to us by such shareholders. Unless otherwise noted below, each shareholder’s address is: c/o 29 Abba Hushi Avenue, P.O. Box 1271, Isfiya, 3009000, Mount Carmel, Israel.
| Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||
| Number | Percent | |||||||
| 5% or Greater Shareholders | ||||||||
| Vijay Ramanathan (1) | 360,000 | 5.1 | % | |||||
| Symetryx Corporation (2) | 338,626 | 4.8 | % | |||||
| EquityLine Alternate Assets GP Inc.(3) | 762,724 | 10.9 | % | |||||
| Parea LLC | 1,169,596 | 16.7 | % | |||||
| Directors and Executive Officers | ||||||||
| Alan Lewis | - | - | ||||||
| David Lontini | - | - | ||||||
| Carlos Cheung | - | - | ||||||
| Michael Hutton | - | - | ||||||
| Daniel Kokiw | - | - | ||||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (5 persons) | - | - | ||||||
| (1) | Based solely upon, and qualified in its entirety with reference to, Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on December 18, 2023. The address of the reporting person is 20 Adelaide St E, Suite 1105, Toronto, ON M5C 2T6, Canada. |
| (2) | Based solely upon, and qualified in its entirety with reference to, Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on September 29, 2023, as amended on October 30, 2023 and November 14, 2023. The address of the reporting person is 2828 Bathurst Street, Suite 400, Toronto, Canada M6B3A7. |
| (3) | Based solely upon, and qualified in its entirety with reference to, Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on April 1, 2024, as amended on April 8, 2024. Sergiy Shchavyelyev, as the sole director of EquityLine Alternate Assets GP Inc., may be deemed to beneficially own the 762,724 Shares owned by EquityLine Alternate Assets GP Inc. The address of the reporting person is 550 Highway 7 East, 338 Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3Z4. |
As of March 1, 2026, based on information provided to us by our transfer agent in the United States and other information reasonably available to us, we had 77 holders of record of our ordinary shares in the United States.
None of our shareholders have voting rights different from the voting rights of other shareholders. To the best of our knowledge, we are not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by another corporation or by any government. We are not aware of any arrangement that may, at a subsequent date, result in a change of control of our company.
To our knowledge, other than as disclosed in the table above, our other filings with the SEC and this Annual Report, there has been no significant change in the percentage ownership held by any major shareholder since January 1, 2022.
103
B. Related Party Transactions
Other than the executive and director compensation, executive officer employment agreements, indemnification and exculpation arrangements and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy discussed in “Management,” and the transactions described below, since January 1, 2021, we have not been or are not a party to any related party transactions. The descriptions provided below are summaries of the terms of such agreements, do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the complete agreements. In addition, we note that certain shareholders of Check-Cap are also shareholders of Apollo.
Pontifax Warrants
On October 14, 2014, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 924 of our ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 48 per share, or the Pontifax Warrants, to the Pontifax Funds in consideration of their commitment to provide to us, for no consideration, the following services, if and to the extent requested by us: (i) business development services, in such scope and substance as shall be agreed between us and the Pontifax; and (ii) a representative designated by Pontifax to serve as the Chairman of our Board of Directors. The Pontifax Funds subsequently agreed that the exercise price of fifty-percent of their warrants will increase to equal the price at which our ordinary shares are sold to the public in the initial public offering of our securities, or if units are sold in the initial public offering of our securities, the exercise price per share will increase to be equal to the effective price per share of the ordinary shares underlying the units sold to the public in the offering. The Pontifax Funds also agreed that such portion of their warrants would vest and become exercisable only upon the consummation of the initial public offering of our securities prior to their expiration date. The remaining warrants with an NIS 48 exercise price would vest on a quarterly basis in eight equal installments during a period of 24 months from issuance. In addition, the Pontifax Funds agreed to reduce the term of their respective warrants such that these warrants will now expire after eight years (instead of ten years) following their issuance, i.e., on October 14, 2022. Upon the closing of our initial public offering any unvested portion of the warrants became fully vested and exercisable. In September 2018, Pontifax exercised 462 of the Pontifax Warrants, with an exercise price of 48 per share, into 376 ordinary shares on a cashless basis. On October 14, 2022, the remaining Pontifax Warrants to purchase 462 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of $1,214.4 per share, expired.
Transactions with Check-Cap LLC and the Members and Manager of Check-Cap LLC
On May 31, 2009, we entered into an asset transfer agreement with Check-Cap LLC pursuant to which Check-Cap LLC transferred all of its business operations and substantially all of its assets to us. Our shareholders’ holdings on the date of the asset transfer transaction reflected their interests as members of Check-Cap LLC. In the framework of the asset transfer agreement and under the Shareholders Agreement, we undertook to use commercially reasonable efforts to procure that distributions or advance funds are made to our shareholders holding (at the date of the transaction) ordinary shares, Series A preferred shares and/or Series B preferred shares (i.e., the shareholders who are also members of Check-Cap LLC), as would be necessary to eliminate the tax impact on such shareholders of the Reorganization and the transfer of all of the business operations and substantially all of the assets from Check-Cap LLC to us. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we will not advance payments to such shareholders to address the fact that they will no longer receive a “pass through” of losses generated by us as they previously received while owning units of Check-Cap LLC. These advances, if and to the extent made, will be deducted from any distributions such shareholders are entitled to receive from us. Since we do not expect to be profitable in year 2025, the liability based on the discounted outflows is $0. As a result, as of December 31, 2025, the balance of the reimbursement liability totaled $0 ($0 as of December 31, 2024 and $0 as of December 31, 2023).
In connection with the asset transfer agreement entered into in May 2009, we assumed the former obligation of Check-Cap LLC to distribute any proceeds it collects on the $1 million key man life insurance policy with respect to Yoav Kimchy, the Company’s chief technology officer and a former director, to the former holders of the Series A preferred units in an amount equal to their respective capital contributed to Check-Cap LLC, less any amounts previously distributed to them, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends due to them as of the date of distribution. On November 16, 2016, we cancelled the key man life insurance policy with respect to Yoav Kimchy.
104
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.
Consolidated Financial Statements
See Item 18 “Financial Statements.”
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we may be involved in litigation that arises through the normal course of business. The following legal proceedings were pending as of December 31, 2025.
On October 7, 2024, a minority shareholder of the Company filed an application in the Haifa District Court (the “Court”) seeking certification of a shareholders’ derivative lawsuit against the Company, certain present and former directors, and a third party. The claim seeks damages in excess of NIS 2.5 million (approximately $784,000) and relates primarily to corporate governance matters, including the validity of certain board decisions and the legality of certain corporate transactions. We filed a response with the Court requesting that certification of the claim as a derivative action be denied. The parties are currently engaged in mediation.
We believe the claims in the derivative action are without merit and we intend to defend vigorously against this action.
During 2024, two former senior executives filed separate claims against the Company seeking an aggregate of approximately NIS 620,000 (approximately $195,000) in respect of alleged unpaid compensation and contractual entitlements following the termination of their respective engagements. We have denied both claims. Statements of Defense were filed in both matters and management believes it is probable the Company will be successful in defending against both claims.
Also during 2024, a former legal services provider filed a claim seeking approximately NIS 175,000 (approximately $55,000) for alleged unpaid legal fees. We have denied the claim, a Statement of Defense has been filed, and the parties are engaged in concurrent mediation proceedings. Management believes it is probable the Company will be successful in defending against this claim.
In September 2024, we ceased making rent payments in respect of our leased premises in Usfiyeh, Israel. The landlord commenced legal proceedings against us and an eviction order was subsequently granted by the court. We have engaged legal counsel in connection with this matter. We have ceased active business operations at the facility, and certain Company property and documentation remain on the premises pending resolution of access and logistical matters. The landlord’s claim for unpaid rent and damages totals approximately NIS 207,000 (approximately $65,000). For further information, see Note 8C to our audited consolidated financial statements.
For all of the above matters, based on the information currently available and after consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe an unfavorable outcome is probable and, accordingly, no provision has been recorded in these consolidated financial statements.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid dividends on our ordinary shares and currently do not intend to pay cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. See Item 3D “Key Information - Risk factors - Risks Related to the Company.”
105
Our ability to distribute dividends also may be limited by future contractual obligations and by Israeli law. The Israeli Companies Law restricts our ability to declare dividends. Unless otherwise approved by a court, we can distribute dividends only from “profits” (as defined by the Israeli Companies Law), and only if there is no reasonable concern that the dividend distribution will prevent us from meeting our existing and foreseeable obligations as they become due. Subject to the foregoing, payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on various factors, such as our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs and other business and economic factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant. See Exhibit 2.1 “Description of Securities-Dividend and Liquidation Rights.” The payment of dividends may be subject to Israeli withholding taxes. See Item 10E. “Additional Information-Taxation-Israeli Tax Considerations and Government Programs-Taxation of Our Shareholders-Taxation of Non-Israeli Shareholders on Receipt of Dividends.” Furthermore, if we pay a dividend out of income attributed to our Benefited Enterprise that was generated during the tax exemption period, we may be subject to tax on the grossed- up amount of such distributed income at the corporate tax rate which would have been applied to our Benefited Enterprise’s income had we not enjoyed the exemption. See Item 10E. “Additional Information-Taxation - Israeli Tax Considerations and Government Programs - Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959 - Tax Benefits Subsequent to the 2005 Amendment.”
B. Significant Changes
Except as disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report and in Note 17 to our audited consolidated financial statements, there have been no other significant changes since December 31, 2025, until the date of the filing of this Annual Report.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
A. Offer and Listing Details
Our units were listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market on February 19, 2015 under the symbol “CHEKU.” Prior to that date, there was no public trading market for our securities. Our initial public offering was priced at $1,440 per unit on February 20, 2015. Each unit consisted of one ordinary share and one-half of a Series A Warrant to purchase one ordinary share. Each unit was issued with one and one-half non-transferrable Long Term Incentive Warrants. On March 18, 2015, the units separated and ceased to exist. Since such date, our ordinary shares and Series A Warrants were listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “CHEK” and “CHEKW”, respectively. The Series A Warrants expired on February 24, 2020 and ceased to be listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market since February 20, 2020. The Long Term Incentive Warrants expired on February 24, 2022. Since May 1, 2023, our Series C Warrants are no longer listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. On April 4, 2018, we effected a 1-for-12 reverse share split of our ordinary shares. On November 23, 2022, we effected a 1-for-20 reverse share split of our ordinary shares. On December 1, 2025, we changed our ticker symbol from “CHEK” to “MBAI” effective at the opening of trading on December 2, 2025.
B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets for Ordinary Shares
See “-Offer and Listing Details” above.
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
106
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
A copy of our amended and restated articles of association is incorporated by reference attached as Exhibit 1.1 to this Annual Report. Other than as disclosed below, the information called for by this Item is set forth in Exhibit 2.1 to this Annual Report and is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
Registration Number and Purposes of the Company
Our registration number with the Israeli Registrar of Companies is 51-425981-1. Our purpose as set forth in our amended articles of association is to engage in any lawful activity.
Shareholder Meetings
Under Israeli law, we are required to hold an annual general meeting of our shareholders once every calendar year that must be held no later than 15 months after the date of the previous annual general meeting. All meetings other than the annual general meeting of shareholders are referred to in our amended articles of association as special general meetings. Our Board of Directors may call special general meetings whenever it sees fit, at such time and place, within or outside of Israel, as it may determine. In addition, the Israeli Companies Law provides that our Board of Directors is required to convene a special general meeting upon the written request of (i) any two of our directors or one-quarter of the serving members of our Board of Directors; or (ii) one or more shareholders holding, in the aggregate, either (a) 5% or more of our outstanding shares and 1% of our outstanding voting power or (b) 5% or more of our outstanding voting power.
Furthermore, the Israeli Companies Law requires that resolutions regarding the following matters be approved by our shareholders at a general meeting:
| ● | approval of certain related party transactions; |
| ● | increases or reductions of our authorized share capital; |
| ● | mergers; and |
| ● | the exercise of our Board of Director’s powers by a general meeting, if our Board of Directors is unable to exercise its powers and the exercise of any of its powers is essential for our proper management. |
Subject to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law and regulations promulgated thereunder, shareholders entitled to participate and vote at general meetings are the shareholders of record on a date to be decided by the Board of Directors, which, as a company listed on an exchange outside Israel, may be between four and 40 days prior to the date of the meeting.
107
The Israeli Companies Law requires that a notice of any annual general meeting or special general meeting be provided to shareholders at least 21 days prior to the meeting and if the agenda of the meeting includes, among other things, the appointment or removal of directors, the approval of transactions with office holders or interested or related parties, an approval of a merger or the approval of the compensation policy, notice must be provided at least 35 days prior to the meeting.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, our shareholders are not permitted to take action via written consent in lieu of a meeting.
Borrowing powers
Pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law and our amended articles of association, our Board of Directors may exercise all powers and take all actions that are not required under law or under our amended articles of association to be exercised or taken by our shareholders, including the power to borrow money for company purposes.
For details regarding the approvals required under the Israeli Companies Law for the approval of director compensation, see Item 6C “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Board Practices -Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law - Disclosure of Personal Interests of an Office Holder and Approval of Certain Transactions-Compensation of Directors.”
C. Material Contracts
Other than as described below, in Item 4. “Information on Our Company,” Item 7B “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions - Related Party Transactions” or elsewhere in this Annual Report, we have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course of business.
Merger Agreement with MBody AI
On September 12, 2025, the Company, Merger Sub, and MBody AI entered into the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into MBody AI, with MBody AI surviving the Merger as a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
At the effective time of the Merger, each share of MBody AI capital stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (excluding treasury shares and certain excluded shares) will be converted solely into the right to receive a number of Check-Cap ordinary shares such that, following the effective time, holders of MBody AI capital stock will own ninety percent (90%) of the issued and outstanding Check-Cap ordinary shares on a fully diluted basis. No fractional Check-Cap ordinary shares will be issued in connection with the Merger.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, and covenants made by the parties, including covenants relating to obtaining requisite shareholder approvals, indemnification of directors and officers, and the conduct of each party’s business between the date of the Merger Agreement and the closing. The closing of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including, among other things: (i) the absence of any order or law preventing the consummation of the transactions; (ii) approval by both Check-Cap and MBody AI shareholders; (iii) the expiration or termination of any applicable antitrust waiting periods; and (iv) the parties’ commercially reasonable efforts to secure a private financing on terms reasonably acceptable to each of the parties.
The Merger Agreement may be terminated by either party if the Merger has not been consummated by June 30, 2026, subject to certain exceptions. The Merger Agreement also provides for certain termination fees. Under specified circumstances, the Company may be required to pay MBody AI an expense reimbursement fee of up to $1,500,000, and in certain other circumstances, the Company may be required to pay MBody AI a termination fee of $2,500,000.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Merger is intended to constitute a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The Merger was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 14, 2025, and closing is anticipated in the first half of 2026. The Apollo BCA is expected to be terminated in connection with the closing of the Merger.
108
Business Combination Agreement with Apollo
On March 25, 2024, the Company entered into the Apollo BCA, pursuant to which a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apollo was to merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Apollo. Under the exchange ratio formula in the Apollo BCA, Check-Cap security holders were expected to own approximately 15% and Apollo security holders were expected to own approximately 85% of the combined entity on a fully diluted basis, subject to certain net cash adjustments. In May 2024, the Company reimbursed Apollo $3,808,815 pursuant to the provisions of the Apollo BCA.
The Apollo BCA remains in effect as of the date of this Annual Report and is expected to be terminated in connection with the closing of the Merger with MBody AI.
Apollo Loan Agreements and Segregated Account
During 2024 and 2025, the Company entered into a series of loan agreements with Apollo, including the September 2024 Loan Agreement ($6.0 million), the December 2024 Loan Agreement ($6.0 million), the First July 2025 Loan Agreement ($2.1 million), and the Second July 2025 Loan Agreement ($2.2 million). The principal outstanding under each loan bears interest at 5% per annum and is payable 30 days following the termination of the Apollo BCA or the consummation of the business combination contemplated thereunder.
In addition, on September 8, 2024, the Company entered into the Amending Letter with Apollo, which amended the Apollo BCA and obligated the Company to deposit $11.0 million into a designated, segregated and interest-bearing bank account (the “Segregated Account”). Funds deposited into the Segregated Account may be disbursed upon the mutual written agreement of the designated representatives of Apollo and the Company in order to fund the pursuit of accretive acquisition targets or other growth initiatives of Apollo and for no other purpose. In the event that the Apollo BCA is terminated, then, subject to the payment of any termination fees triggered by Section 9.3(c) of the Apollo BCA, funds remaining in the Segregated Account upon termination, together with interest earned thereon, will accrue to and will be for the account and benefit of the Company.
As of December 31, 2025, $2.1 million of the Segregated Account had been used for acquisition targets and growth initiatives, $0.7 million had been used for certain expenses incurred by the Company, and $2.2 million remained in the Segregated Account. In July 2025, in connection with the audit of the Company’s December 31, 2024 financial statements, the Company classified the $2.1 million used for acquisition targets and growth initiatives and the $2.2 million remaining in the Segregated Account as loans to Apollo and entered into loan agreements with Apollo on the same terms as the December 2024 Loan Agreement to document such classifications, given that the Segregated Account is in the name of an affiliate of Apollo.
For a discussion of the impairment and subsequent reversal of the Apollo Loans, see Item 5A “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Results of Operations.”
Asset Purchase Agreement with Parea
On September 5, 2025, the Company entered into the Parea APA, pursuant to which the Company acquired all right, title, and interest in a contract granting exclusive Ghost Kitchen area representative rights across the state of New Jersey. As consideration for the acquired assets, the Company issued 1,169,596 ordinary shares to Parea LLC. For a description of the Ghost Kitchen area representative business, see Item 4B “Information on Our Company — Business Overview — Parea.”
109
Purchase Agreement with ARC
In December 2025, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with ARC, pursuant to which ARC committed to purchase up to $30.0 million of the Company’s ordinary shares over a period of three years from the effective date of the registration statement filed in connection therewith. The Company may direct ARC to purchase ordinary shares by delivering advance notices from time to time, subject to certain conditions and limitations. In consideration for ARC’s commitment under the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 267,857 ordinary shares as a commitment fee, having an aggregate value of $450,000.
The purchase price for shares sold pursuant to the first advance notice is 97% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the ordinary shares during three consecutive trading days commencing on the date the advance notice is received by ARC. Any sale of ordinary shares pursuant to the Purchase Agreement is subject to certain limitations, including that ARC and its affiliates may not own more than 9.99% of the then outstanding ordinary shares at any time. In addition, the aggregate number of ordinary shares that the Company may issue to ARC under the Purchase Agreement may not exceed 19.99% of the ordinary shares outstanding as of the date of the Purchase Agreement (the “Exchange Cap”), unless the Company obtains the requisite shareholder approval or Nasdaq grants an exception; provided that because the Company as a foreign private issuer follows home country practice, the Exchange Cap does not apply.
In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form F-1 with the SEC on January 30, 2026, as amended on February 2, 2026, which became effective on February 23, 2026, registering the resale by ARC of up to 2,000,000 ordinary shares issuable under the Purchase Agreement.
D. Exchange controls
There are currently no Israeli currency control restrictions on remittances of dividends on our ordinary shares, proceeds from the sale of the shares or interest or other payments to non- residents of Israel, except for shareholders who are subjects of countries that are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel.
E. Taxation
The following description is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to our ordinary shares, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants (sometimes referred to collectively or individually as our “securities”). You should consult your own tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of your particular situation, as well as any tax consequences that may arise under the laws of any state, local, non-U.S. or other taxing jurisdiction.
Israeli Tax Considerations and Government Programs
The following is a brief summary of the material Israeli tax laws applicable to us and certain Israeli Government programs that benefit us. This section also contains a discussion of material Israeli tax consequences concerning the ownership and disposition of our securities purchased by investors who are non-Israeli resident shareholders. This summary does not discuss all the aspects of Israeli tax law that may be relevant to a particular investor in light of his or her personal investment circumstances or to some types of investors subject to special treatment under Israeli law. Examples of such investors include residents of Israel or traders in securities who are subject to special tax regimes not covered in this discussion. Because parts of this discussion are based on new tax legislation that has not yet been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation, we cannot assure you that the appropriate tax authorities or the courts will accept the views expressed in this discussion. The discussion below is subject to change, including due to amendments under Israeli law or changes to the applicable judicial or administrative interpretations of Israeli law, which change could affect the tax consequences described below.
110
General Corporate Tax Structure in Israel
Israeli resident companies are generally subject to corporate tax, currently at the rate of 23% (effective as of January 1, 2018) of a company’s taxable income. However, the effective tax rate payable by a company that derives income from an Approved Enterprise, a Benefited Enterprise a Preferred Enterprise or a Preferred Technological Enterprise (as discussed below) may be considerably less. Capital gains derived by an Israeli resident company are subject to tax at the prevailing corporate tax rate.
Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 5729-1969
The Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 5729-1969, generally referred to as the Industry Encouragement Law, provides several tax benefits for “Industrial Companies.” The Industry Encouragement Law defines an “Industrial Company” as a company resident in Israel, of which 90% or more of its income in any tax year, other than income from defense loans, is derived from an “Industrial Enterprise” owned by it and located in Israel or in the “Area” (as such term is defined under Section 3A of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance (New Version), 5721-1961, referred to as the Ordinance). An “Industrial Enterprise” is defined as an enterprise whose principal activity in a given tax year is industrial production.
The following corporate tax benefits, among others, are available to Industrial Companies:
| ● | amortization over an eight-year period, beginning from the year in which such rights were first used, of the cost of purchased know-how and patents and rights to use a patent and know-how which are used for the development or advancement of the Industrial Enterprise; |
| ● | under limited conditions, a Parent Company (as such term defined in the Industry Encouragement Law) may elect to file consolidated tax returns with related Israeli Industrial Companies; and |
| ● | expenses related to a public offering are deductible in equal amounts over three years beginning from the year of the offering. |
Eligibility for the benefits under the Industry Encouragement Law is not subject to receipt of prior approval from any governmental authority. We believe that we may qualify as an “Industrial Company” within the meaning of the Industry Encouragement Law; however, there can be no assurance that we will qualify as an Industrial Company or that the benefits described above will be available in the future.
Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959
The Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959, generally referred to as the Investment Law, was originally enacted in order to provide certain incentives for capital investments in production facilities (or other eligible assets).
The Investment Law has been amended several times in recent years, primarily: Amendment 60, effective as of April 1, 2005, referred to as the 2005 Amendment; Amendment 68, effective as of January 1, 2011, referred to as the 2011 Amendment; Amendment 71, effective as of January 1, 2014, referred to as the 2014 Amendment; Amendment 73, effective as of January 1, 2017, referred to as the 2017 Amendment; and Amendment 74, effective as of August 15, 2021, referred to as the 2021 Amendment. Pursuant to the foregoing amendments, generally tax benefits that were granted in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Law prior to each such amendment remain in force; however, any benefits granted subsequent to the respective amendment are subject to the provisions of the Investment Law as amended.
Tax Benefits Prior to the 2005 Amendment
Prior to the 2005 Amendment, a capital investment in eligible production facilities (or other eligible assets) could, upon application to the Investment Center of the Israeli Ministry of Economy (formerly named the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor), be designated as an “Approved Enterprise” and accordingly, entitled to certain tax benefits under the Investment Law. Each certificate of approval for an Approved Enterprise relates to a specific investment program in the Approved Enterprise, delineated both by the financial scope of the investment and by the physical characteristics of the facility or the asset. We do not have any Approved Enterprises.
111
Tax Benefits Subsequent to the 2005 Amendment
Pursuant to the 2005 Amendment, a company whose facilities meet certain criteria set forth in the 2005 Amendment may claim certain tax benefits offered by the Investment Law (as further described below) directly in its tax returns, without the need to obtain prior approval. In order to receive the tax benefits, a company must make an investment which meets all of the conditions, including exceeding a minimum entitling investment amount, set forth in the Investment Law. Such investment allows a company to receive “Benefited Enterprise” status, and may be made over a period of no more than three years ending at the end of the year in which the company chose to have the tax benefits apply to its Benefited Enterprise, referred to as the “Year of Election.”
The extent of the tax benefits available under the 2005 Amendment to qualifying income of a Benefited Enterprise depends on, among other things, the geographic location in Israel of the Benefited Enterprise. The location will also determine the period for which tax benefits are available. Under the “Exemption Track” the tax benefits include an exemption from corporate tax on undistributed income generated by the Benefited Enterprise for a period of two to ten years, depending on the geographic location of the Benefited Enterprise in Israel, and a reduced corporate tax rate of 10% to 25% for the remainder of the benefits period, depending on the level of foreign investment in the company in each year. The benefits period is for a duration of seven or ten years, depending on the location of the Benefited Enterprise, from the later of the first year in which the company generated taxable income from its Benefited Enterprise and the Year of Election, but in any event not more than 12 or 14 years from the Year of Election, depending on the location of the Benefited Enterprise. A company qualifying for tax benefits under the Exemption Track which pays a dividend (as well as a deemed dividend, such as investments in foreign resident subsidiaries, granting loans to related parties, repurchases of shares, acquisitions of securities/shares, capital reductions and additional events which reflect the transfer of funds out of the Benefitted Enterprise activity) out of income derived during the tax exemption period by its Benefited Enterprise will be subject to corporate tax in respect of the amount of the dividend (grossed-up to reflect the pre-tax income that it would have had to earn in order to distribute the dividend) at the corporate tax rate which would have otherwise been applicable. Dividends paid out of income attributed to a Benefited Enterprise are generally subject to withholding tax at source at the rate of 20% or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty. With respect to such dividends, the recently enacted 2021 Amendment introduced a new dividend distribution ordering rule as well as a Temporary Order to incentivize the distribution thereof (see discussion below under “Tax Benefits under the 2021 Amendment”). Applying reduced tax rates in accordance with a certain tax treaty is subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the Israel Tax Authority allowing for a reduced tax rate.
The benefits available to a Benefited Enterprise are subject to the fulfillment of conditions stipulated in the Investment Law and its regulations. If a company does not meet these conditions, it may be required to refund the amount of tax benefits, as adjusted by the Israeli consumer price index, plus interest, or other monetary penalties.
We currently have one Benefited Enterprise program under the Investment Law, which, we believe, entitles us to certain tax benefits with respect to income to be derived from our Benefited Enterprise. We chose 2010 as the Year of Election. We believe that we are located in the Zone A specified development zone and therefore, believe we are entitled to a 10-year benefit period, during which taxable income from our Benefited Enterprise program (once generated) will be tax exempt, commencing with the year we will first earn taxable income relating to such enterprise, subject to a 14-year limitation from the Year of Election, and therefore, the tax benefit period will in any event end in 2023.
Tax Benefits under the 2011 Amendment and the 2014 Amendment
The 2011 Amendment canceled the availability of the benefits granted to companies under the Investment Law prior to 2011 and, instead, introduced new benefits for income generated by a “Preferred Company” through its “Preferred Enterprise” or “Special Preferred Enterprise” (as such terms are defined in the Investment Law) as of January 1, 2011. The definition of a Preferred Company includes, among other limitations detailed under the Investment Law, a company incorporated in Israel that is not wholly-owned by a governmental entity, and that, among other things, owns a Preferred Enterprise or Special Preferred Enterprise and is controlled and managed from Israel. Under the 2014 Amendment, effective as of January 1, 2014, a Preferred Company is entitled to a reduced corporate tax rate of 16% with respect to its income derived by its Preferred Enterprise in 2014 and thereafter, unless the Preferred Enterprise is located in a specified development zone (referred to as “Zone A”), in which case the rate will be 9% for the tax years 2014-2016 and, pursuant to the 2017 Amendment (as discussed below), 7.5% from 2017 and thereafter. We believe our facilities are located in the Zone A specified development zone.
112
Dividends paid out of income attributed to a Preferred Enterprise are generally subject to withholding tax at source at the rate of 20% or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty. However, if such dividends are paid to an Israeli company, no tax is required to be withheld (although, if such dividends are subsequently distributed to individuals or a non-Israeli company, withholding tax at a rate of 20% or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty will apply).
The 2011 Amendment also provided transitional provisions to address companies already enjoying existing tax benefits under the Investment Law. These transitional provisions provide, among other things, that unless an irrevocable request is made to apply the provisions of the Investment Law as amended in 2011 with respect to income to be derived as of January 1, 2011, a Benefited Enterprise can elect to continue to benefit from the benefits provided to it before the 2011 Amendment came into effect, provided that certain conditions are met.
We are currently examining whether we are eligible for the tax benefits under the 2011 Amendment and the possible effect, if any, of the provisions of the 2011 Amendment on our financial statements.
Tax Benefits under the 2017 Amendment
The 2017 Amendment was enacted as part of the Economic Efficiency Law that was published on December 29, 2016, and became effective as of January 1, 2017. The 2017 Amendment provides new tax benefits for two types of “Technological Enterprises”, as described below, and is in addition to the other existing tax beneficial programs under the Investment Law.
The 2017 Amendment provides two new tax incentive tracks - the “Preferred Technological Enterprise” track and “Special Preferred Technological Enterprise” track (as such terms are defined in the Investment Law). The benefits available to a Preferred Technological Enterprise or Special Preferred Technological Enterprise are subject to the fulfillment of conditions stipulated in the Investment Law.
A Preferred Technological Enterprise is entitled (among other things) to a reduced corporate tax rate of 12% with respect to its income which qualifies as “Preferred Technology Income”, as defined in the Investment Law, unless the Preferred Technological Enterprise is located in a specified development zone (referred to as “Zone A”), in which case the rate will be 7.5%. A Special Preferred Technological Enterprises is entitled to a reduced corporate tax rate of 6% with respect to its Preferred Technology Income, regardless of the company’s enterprise geographic location within Israel.
We are currently examining whether we are eligible for the tax benefits under the 2017 Amendment and the possible effect, if any, of the provisions of the 2017 Amendment on our financial statements.
Tax Benefits under the 2021 Amendment
The 2021 Amendment introduced a new dividend distribution ordering rule to cause the distribution of earnings that were tax-exempt under the historical Approved or Beneficial Enterprise regimes (Trapped Earnings), to be on a pro-rata basis from any dividend distribution, which is applicable to distributions starting from August 15, 2021 onwards. Accordingly, the corporate income tax claw-back will apply to any dividend distribution, as long as the company has Trapped Earnings.
The termination or substantial reduction of any of the benefits available under the Investment Law could materially increase our future tax liabilities.
113
The Encouragement of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 5744-1984 (formerly known as the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development Law, 5744-1984)
Under the Encouragement of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 5744-1984 (formerly known as the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development Law, 5744-1984), referred to as the Innovation Law, research and development programs that meet specified criteria and are approved by the IIA are eligible for grants. As of December 31, 2025, we had received funding from the IIA for the financing of a portion of our research and development expenditures for C-Scan in the aggregate amount of approximately $5.6 million. As of December 31, 2025, we had not paid any royalties to the IIA and had a contingent liability to the IIA with respect to such funding in the amount of approximately $6.2 million. In addition, in January 2021, we received an IIA grant approval to support the funding of our transition from research and development to manufacturing. The final IIA grant amounted to $620,000 (NIS 2.25 million) (along with a co-investment by us of the same amount), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the grant approval, which we are not required to repay to the IIA, of which we received approximately $0 (NIS 0) in 2025 and 2024, and $225,000 (NIS 816,075) in February 2023.
Under the Innovation Law as currently in effect, the research and development grants are typically up to 50% of the project’s approved expenditures. The grantee is required to pay royalties to the State of Israel from the sale of products (and associated services) developed using IIA research and development funding. Regulations under the Innovation Law, as currently in effect, generally provide for the payment of royalties of 3% or 4% (and at an increased rate under certain circumstances) on sales of products and services based on technology and know-how developed using such IIA research and development grants, until 100% (which may be increased under certain circumstances) of the grant, linked to the U.S. dollar and bearing interest at the LIBOR rate, is repaid.
The terms of IIA grants that we have received (the research and development grants and the transition to manufacturing grants) require that products developed with IIA funded be manufactured in Israel, unless the IIA approved grant program includes a pre-determined portion of manufacturing that may be performed outside Israel (as certain of our IIA approved grants included). The approval of the IIA is required for the transferring of manufacturing outside Israel in excess of such pre-determined portion (however, only a notice to the IIA, as opposed to approval, is required for the transfer outside Israel of up to 10% of the cumulative manufacturing in excess of such pre-approved portion). If manufacturing of IIA-funded products is transferred outside Israel (following IIA approval) in excess of the pre-determined percentage included in the grant approval, then the royalty repayment rate is increased by 1% with respect to the additional approved percentage to be manufactured outside Israel and the royalty repayment for the entire approved program may be increased to up to three times the amount of the grants received, depending on the percentage manufactured outside Israel (plus accrued interest). We may explore from time to time whether certain other components of C-Scan can be assembled outside of Israel. For example, we may in the future explore whether it would be possible to assemble the capsule without the X-ray source in Israel, and have the X-ray source subsequently manufactured and assembled into C-Scan at a certified radioisotope production facility or at a distribution center outside Israel.
Over the years, we received approval of grant applications (research and development grants and the transition to manufacturing grant) that included a certain predetermined percentage of manufacturing of the X-ray source to be performed outside of Israel but additional examination of these approvals and consequent manufacturing is required to determine liabilities to the IIA, if any.
IIA prior approval is also required for the transfer of IIA-funded know-how to a third party outside of Israel (including by way of license), which we may not receive (and any such approval would be subject to payment of a redemption fee, calculated according to a formula under the Innovation Law, which may be in the amount of up to six times the amount of the grants received, (less paid royalties, if any, and depreciation, but no less than the total grants received), plus accrued interest). Even following the full repayment of any IIA grants, we must nevertheless continue to comply with the requirements of the Innovation Law. If we fail to comply with any of the conditions and restrictions imposed by the Innovation Law and regulations and guidelines thereunder, or by the specific terms under which we received the grants, we may be required to refund any grants previously received together with interest and penalties, and, in certain circumstances, may be subject to criminal charges.
114
Taxation of our Shareholders
Capital Gains Taxes Applicable to Non-Israeli Resident Shareholders. A non-Israeli resident who derives capital gains from the sale of securities of an Israeli resident company will be exempt from Israeli tax so long as (i) the capital gains are not attributed to a permanent establishment that the non-resident maintains in Israel, (ii) the securities were not received from a relative or in a tax free reorganization transaction and (iii) the securities are not traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange on the date of sale (provided, however, that other exemptions may apply if a an Israeli resident company is listed for trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange). However, non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemption if Israeli residents: (i) have a controlling interest of 25% or more in such non-Israeli corporation; or (ii) are the beneficiaries of, or are entitled to, 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such non-Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly.
Additionally, a sale of securities by a non-Israeli resident may be exempt from Israeli capital gains tax under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty. For example, under the Convention Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the State of Israel with respect to Taxes on Income, as amended, generally referred to as the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, the sale, exchange or other disposition of shares by a shareholder who (i) is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the treaty); (ii) holds the shares as a capital asset; and (iii) is entitled to claim the benefits afforded to such person by the treaty, is generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax. Such exemption will not apply if, among other things: (i) the capital gain arising from such sale, exchange or other disposition is treated as industrial or commercial profits attributed to a permanent establishment in Israel, subject to certain conditions; (ii) the shareholder holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of the voting capital of the corporation during any part of the 12-month period preceding the disposition, subject to certain conditions; (iii) the capital gain arising from such sale, exchange or disposition is treated as royalties; or (iv) such U.S. resident is an individual and was present in Israel for 183 days or more during the relevant taxable year. In such case, the sale, exchange or disposition of our securities would be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable; however, under the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, the taxpayer would be permitted to claim a credit for such taxes against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to such sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations under U.S. law applicable to foreign tax credits. The United States-Israel Tax Treaty does not relate to U.S. state or local taxes. The United States-Israel Tax Treaty is currently under review and subject to change.
In some instances where our shareholders may be liable for Israeli tax on the sale of their securities, the payment of the consideration may be subject to the withholding of Israeli tax at source. Shareholders may be required to demonstrate that they are exempt from tax on their capital gains and to obtain an exemption from withholding tax certificate from the Israel Tax Authority in order to avoid withholding at source at the time of sale.
Taxation of Non-Israeli Shareholders on Receipt of Dividends. Non-Israeli residents are generally subject to Israeli withholding tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our ordinary shares at the rate of 25%, unless relief is provided in a treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence (subject to the receipt of a valid certificate from the Israeli Tax Authority allowing for a reduced tax rate). With respect to a person who is a “substantial shareholder” at the time of receiving the dividend or at any time during the preceding 12 months, the applicable withholding tax rate is 30%, unless such “substantial shareholder” holds such shares through a nominee company, in which case the rate is 25%. A “substantial shareholder” is generally a person who alone or together with such person’s relative (as such term is defined in the Ordinance) or another person who collaborates with such person on a permanent basis, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of any of the “means of control” of the corporation. “Means of control” generally include the right to vote, receive profits, nominate a director or an executive officer, receive assets upon liquidation, or order someone who holds any of the aforesaid rights how to act, regardless of the source of such right.
However, a distribution of dividends to non-Israeli residents is subject to withholding tax at source at a rate of 15% if the dividend is distributed from income attributed to an Approved Enterprise or a Benefited Enterprise and 20% if the dividend is distributed from income attributed to a Preferred Enterprise or a Preferred Technological Enterprise, unless a reduced tax rate is provided under an applicable tax treaty. The corporate income tax claw-back may apply upon any dividend distribution, as long as the company has Trapped Earnings (see discussion above under “Tax Benefits under the 2021 Amendment”). We cannot assure you that in the event we declare a dividend we will designate the income out of which the dividend is paid in a manner that will reduce shareholders’ tax liability.
115
Under the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, the maximum rate of tax withheld at source in Israel on dividends paid to a holder of our ordinary shares who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the United States-Israel Tax Treaty) is 25%. With respect to dividends paid to a U.S. corporation that held 10% or more of the capital of the paying corporation throughout the tax year in which the dividend is distributed and the preceding tax year and provided that not more than 25% of the gross income of the paying corporation for such prior taxable year (if any) consists of certain interest or dividends, the maximum rate of tax withheld at source is 12.5%; provided, however, that if the paying corporation is an Approved Enterprise, the applicable withholding tax rate under such circumstances is reduced to 15% (rather than 12.5%). We believe that the reference in the United States-Israel Tax Treaty to an Approved Enterprise under the Investment Law is deemed to include also a Benefitted Enterprise Preferred Enterprise and Preferred Technological Enterprise under the Investment Law. The United States-Israel Tax Treaty is currently under review and subject to change.
U.S. residents who are subject to Israeli withholding tax on a dividend may be entitled to a credit or deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the amount of the taxes withheld, subject to detailed rules contained in U.S. tax legislation.
Exercise or Lapse of Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant. A holder of a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant generally will not recognize gain or loss upon the exercise of a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant for cash. An ordinary share acquired pursuant to the exercise of a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant for cash generally will have a tax basis equal to the holder’s tax basis in the Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant (as the case may be), increased by the amount paid to exercise the Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant. The holding period of such ordinary share generally would begin on the day after the date of exercise of the Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant. If a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, the holder generally will recognize a capital loss equal to such holder’s tax basis in the Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant (as the case may be).
It is possible that a cashless exercise would be treated as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss is recognized. In such event, a holder could be deemed to have surrendered a number of Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants with a fair market value equal to the exercise price for the number of Series C Warrants or Series D deemed exercised. For this purpose, the number of Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed exercised would be equal to the number of Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants, as applicable, that would entitle the holder to receive upon exercise the number of ordinary shares issued pursuant to the cashless exercise of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants (as the case maybe). In this situation, the holder would recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed surrendered to pay the exercise price and the holder’s tax basis in the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed surrendered.
Adjustments with Respect to Warrants. The terms of the Series C Warrant and Series D Warrant provide for an adjustment to the number of ordinary shares for which the warrant may be exercised or adjustment to the exercise price of the warrant in certain events. An adjustment of the exercise price or an adjustment that has the effect of preventing dilution generally is not taxable. However, the holders of the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants may be treated as receiving a constructive distribution from us if, for example, the adjustment increases the warrant holders’ proportionate interest in our assets or earnings and profits (e.g., through a decrease in the exercise price of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants) as a result of a distribution of cash to the holders of our ordinary shares, which is taxable to the holders of such ordinary shares as described under “-Taxation of our Shareholders” above. Such constructive distribution would be subject to tax as described under that section in the same manner as if the holders of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants received a cash distribution from us equal to the fair market value of such increased interest. Holders of Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants are urged to consult their own tax advisors on these issues.
Surtax
Subject to the provisions of an applicable tax treaty, individuals who are subject to tax in Israel are also subject to an additional tax at a rate of 3% on annual income (including, but not limited to, dividends, interest and capital gain) exceeding NIS 721,560 for 2024, which amount is linked to the annual change in the Israeli consumer price index.
Estate and Gift Tax
Israeli law presently does not impose estate or gift taxes.
EACH HOLDER OF OUR SECURITIES IS URGED TO CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO SUCH HOLDER OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR SECURITIES, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF ANY ISRAELI TAX LAWS AND ANY APPLICABLE TAX TREATIES.
116
If a United States person is treated as owning at least 10% of our shares, such holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.
If a United States person is treated as owning (directly, indirectly or constructively) at least 10% of the value or voting power of our shares, such person may be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” in our group (if any). A United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to annually report and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangible low-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property by controlled foreign corporations, whether or not we make any distributions, and may be subject to tax reporting obligations. An individual that is a United States shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a United States shareholder that is a U.S. corporation. A failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject you to significant monetary penalties and may prevent the statute of limitations with respect to your U.S. federal income tax return for the year for which reporting was due from starting. We cannot provide any assurances that we will assist any shareholder in determining whether such shareholder is treated as a United States shareholder with respect to any “controlled foreign corporation” in our group (if any) or furnish to any United States shareholders information that may be necessary to comply with the aforementioned reporting and tax paying obligations. A United States investor should consult its tax advisors regarding the potential application of these rules to its investment in the shares.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation
The following are certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our securities.
The discussion below of the U.S. federal income tax consequences to “U.S. Holders” will apply to a beneficial owner of our securities that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
| ● | an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
| ● | a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation) that is created or organized (or treated as created or organized) in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
| ● | an estate whose income is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source; or |
| ● | a trust if (i) a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust; or (ii) it has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. |
A beneficial owner of our securities that is described above is referred to herein as a “U.S. Holder.” If a beneficial owner of our securities is not described as a U.S. Holder and is not an entity treated as a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such owner will be considered a “Non-U.S. Holder.” Certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our securities applicable specifically to Non-U.S. Holders are described below under the heading “Non-U.S. Holders.”
This discussion is based on the Code, its legislative history, U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, or the Treaty, published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect. These authorities are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.
This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to any particular holder based on such holder’s individual circumstances. In particular, this discussion considers only holders that own and hold our securities as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment), and does not address the potential application of the alternative minimum tax or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders that are subject to special rules, including, but not limited to:
| ● | financial institutions or financial services entities; |
| ● | broker-dealers; |
117
| ● | persons that are subject to the mark-to-market accounting rules under Section 475 of the Code; |
| ● | tax-exempt entities; |
| ● | retirement plans; |
| ● | governments or agencies or instrumentalities thereof; |
| ● | insurance companies; |
| ● | regulated investment companies; |
| ● | real estate investment trusts; |
| ● | grantor trusts; |
| ● | certain expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States; |
| ● | persons that actually or constructively own 5% or more of our shares (by vote or value); |
| ● | persons that acquired our securities pursuant to an exercise of employee options, in connection with employee incentive plans or otherwise as compensation; |
| ● | persons that hold our securities as part of a straddle, constructive sale, hedging, conversion or other integrated transaction; |
| ● | persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; |
| ● | passive foreign investment companies; or |
| ● | controlled foreign corporations. |
This discussion does not address any aspect of U.S. federal non-income tax laws, such as gift or estate tax laws, or state, local or non-U.S. tax laws or, except as discussed herein, any tax reporting obligations applicable to a holder of our securities. Additionally, this discussion does not consider the tax treatment of partnerships or other pass-through entities or persons who hold our securities through such entities. If a partnership (or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is the beneficial owner of our securities, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner (or person or entity treated as a partner) in the partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. This discussion also assumes that any distribution made (or deemed made) to a holder in respect of our securities and any consideration received (or deemed received) by a holder in connection with the sale or other disposition of our securities will be in U.S. dollars. In addition, as described in “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Taxation”, there is a risk that we could be treated as a domestic (U.S.) corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes by reason of the Reorganization; this discussion also assumes that we will be and have been treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Moreover, this discussion assumes that a holder owns a sufficient number of Series C Warrants and/or Series D Warrants, such that the holder will not have a fractional warrant upon the exercise of a Series C Warrant and/or, Series D Warrant, as the case may be.
We have not sought, and will not seek, a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of counsel as to any U.S. federal income tax consequence described herein. The IRS may disagree with the description herein, and its determination may be upheld by a court. Moreover, there can be no assurance that future legislation, regulations, administrative rulings or court decisions will not adversely affect the accuracy of the statements in this discussion.
EACH HOLDER OF OUR SECURITIES IS URGED TO CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO SUCH HOLDER OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR SECURITIES, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, AND NON-U.S. TAX LAWS, AS WELL AS U.S. FEDERAL TAX LAWS AND ANY APPLICABLE TAX TREATIES.
118
U.S. Holders
Taxation of Cash Distributions
As noted above, we currently do not intend to pay cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. Subject to the passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally will be required to include in gross income as ordinary income the amount of any cash dividend paid in respect of our ordinary shares. A cash distribution on our ordinary shares generally will be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes). Such dividend generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S. corporations. The portion of such cash distribution, if any, in excess of such earnings and profits will be applied against and reduce (but not below zero) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ordinary shares. Any remaining excess generally will be treated as gain from the sale or other taxable disposition of such ordinary shares. We do not intend to calculate our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, a U.S. Holder should expect that a distribution will be reported as a dividend even if that distribution would otherwise be treated as a non-taxable return of capital or as capital gain under the rules described above.
With respect to non-corporate U.S. Holders, any such cash dividends may be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the lower applicable regular long term capital gains tax rate (see “- Taxation on the Disposition of Ordinary Shares or Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants” below) provided that (a) our ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States or we are eligible for the benefits of the Treaty, (b) we are not a PFIC, as discussed below, for either the taxable year in which the dividend was paid or the preceding taxable year, and (c) certain holding period requirements are met. Therefore, if our ordinary shares are not readily tradable on an established securities market, and we are not eligible for the benefits of the Treaty, then cash dividends paid by us to non-corporate U.S. Holders will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the lower regular long term capital gains tax rate. Under published IRS authority, shares are considered for purposes of clause (a) above to be readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States only if they are listed on certain exchanges, which presently include the Nasdaq Capital Market. Although our ordinary shares are currently listed and traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market, U.S. Holders nevertheless should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the lower rate for any cash dividends paid with respect to our ordinary shares.
Dividends paid to a U.S. Holder with respect to our ordinary shares generally will be foreign source income, which may be relevant in calculating such U.S. Holder’s foreign tax credit limitations. Subject to certain conditions and limitations, non-refundable Israeli tax withheld on dividends may be deducted from such U.S. Holder’s taxable income or credited against such U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The election to deduct, rather than credit, foreign taxes, is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid by a U.S. Holder or withheld from a U.S. Holder that year. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, dividends that we distribute generally should constitute “passive category income,” or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “general category income.” A foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on distributions may be denied if a U.S. Holder does not satisfy certain minimum holding period requirements. In addition, U.S. Treasury regulations that apply to taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021 may preclude a U.S. Holder from claiming a foreign tax credit with respect to Israeli taxes on gain from dispositions of ordinary shares unless the U.S. Holder is eligible for benefits under the Treaty and elects its application and other applicable requirements are satisfied. However, a recent notice from the IRS indicates that the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS are considering proposing amendments to such U.S. Treasury regulations and allows, subject to certain conditions, taxpayers to defer the application of many aspects of such U.S. Treasury regulations for taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021 and ending before the date that a notice or other guidance withdrawing or modifying the temporary relief is issued (or any later date specified in such notice or other guidance). The rules relating to the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex, and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors to determine whether and to what extent they will be entitled to this credit.
119
Adjustments with Respect to Warrants
The terms of each Series C Warrant and Series D Warrant provide for an adjustment to the number of ordinary shares for which the warrant may be exercised or to the exercise price of the warrant in certain events. An adjustment that has the effect of preventing dilution generally is not taxable. However, the U.S. Holders of the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants would be treated as receiving a constructive distribution from us if, for example, the adjustment increases the warrant holders’ proportionate interest in our assets or earnings and profits (e.g., through a decrease in the exercise price of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants) as a result of a distribution of cash to the holders of our ordinary shares, which is taxable to the U.S. Holders of such ordinary shares as described under “- Taxation of Cash Distributions,” above. Such constructive distribution would be subject to tax as described under that section in the same manner as if the U.S. Holders of the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants received a cash distribution from us equal to the fair market value of such increased interest. U.S. Holders of Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants are urged to consult their own tax advisors on these issues.
Taxation on the Disposition of Ordinary Shares or Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants
Upon a sale or other taxable disposition of our ordinary shares or the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants, and subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the securities.
The regular U.S. federal income tax rate on capital gains recognized by U.S. Holders generally is the same as the regular U.S. federal income tax rate on ordinary income, except that long term capital gains recognized by non-corporate U.S. Holders generally are subject to U.S. federal income tax at a maximum regular rate of 20%. Capital gain or loss will constitute long term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the securities exceeds one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to various limitations. Any such gain or loss that a U.S. Holder recognizes generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
As discussed in “Israel Tax Consideration and Government Programs − Taxation of our Shareholders” above. an Israeli capital gains tax may apply to any gains from the disposition of our ordinary shares or the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants by a U.S. Holder. If such Israeli tax applies to any such gain, Treasury regulations that apply to taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021 may preclude a U.S. Holder from claiming a foreign tax credit for such tax unless the U.S. holder is eligible for benefits under the Treaty, if such holder is considered a resident of the United States for purposes of the Treaty, and otherwise meets the requirements for claiming benefits under the Treaty. However, a recent notice from the IRS indicates that the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS are considering proposing amendments to such Treasury regulations and allows, subject to certain conditions, taxpayers to defer the application of many aspects of such Treasury regulations for taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021 and ending before the date that a notice or other guidance withdrawing or modifying the temporary relief is issued (or any later date specified in such notice or other guidance). In lieu of claiming a credit, a U.S. Holder may be able to elect to deduct the Israeli taxes in computing taxable income, subject to applicable limitations. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all foreign taxes paid or accrued in the relevant taxable year. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the deduction or credit for any such Israeli tax and their eligibility for the benefits of the Treaty.
Additional Taxes
U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts and whose income exceeds certain thresholds generally may be subject to a 3.8% Medicare contribution tax on unearned income, including, without limitation, dividends on, and gains from the sale or other taxable disposition of, our ordinary shares or the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of such tax on their ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares or the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants.
120
Exercise or Lapse of a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally will not recognize gain or loss upon the exercise of a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant for cash. An ordinary share acquired pursuant to the exercise of a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant for cash generally will have a tax basis equal to the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant, as applicable, increased by the amount paid to exercise the Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant. The holding period of such ordinary share generally would begin on the day after the date of exercise of the Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant. If a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize a capital loss equal to such holder’s tax basis in the Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant.
The tax consequences of a cashless exercise of Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants are not clear under current tax law. A cashless exercise may be tax-free, either because it is not a realization event (i.e., not a transaction in which gain or loss is realized) or because the transaction is treated as a recapitalization for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In either tax-free situation, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the ordinary shares received would equal the U.S. Holder’s basis in the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants surrendered. If the cashless exercise were treated as not being a realization event, the U.S. Holder’s holding period in the ordinary shares could be treated as commencing on the date following the date of exercise of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants. If the cashless exercise were treated as a recapitalization, the holding period of the ordinary shares received would include the holding period of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants, as applicable.
It is also possible that a cashless exercise could be treated as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss is recognized. In such event, a U.S. Holder could be deemed to have surrendered a number of Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants, as applicable, with a fair market value equal to the exercise price for the number of Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed exercised. For this purpose, the number of Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed exercised would be equal to the amount needed to receive on exercise the number of ordinary shares issued pursuant to the cashless exercise of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants. In this situation, the U.S. Holder would recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed surrendered to pay the exercise price and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed surrendered. Such gain or loss would be long-term or short-term depending on the U.S. Holder’s holding period in the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants, as applicable. In this case, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the ordinary shares received would equal the sum of the fair market value of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed surrendered to pay the exercise price and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants deemed exercised, and a U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares should commence on the date following the date of exercise of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants. There also may be alternative characterizations of any such taxable exchange that would result in similar tax consequences, except that a U.S. Holder’s gain or loss would be short-term.
Due to the absence of authority on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a cashless exercise of Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants, it is unclear which, if any, of the alternative tax consequences and holding periods described above would be adopted by the IRS or a court of law. Accordingly, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of a cashless exercise of Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
A foreign (i.e., non-U.S.) corporation will be a PFIC if either (a) at least 75% of its gross income in a taxable year of the foreign corporation, including its pro rata share of the gross income of any corporation in which it is considered to own at least 25% of the corporation by value, is passive income, or (b) at least 50% of the average value of its assets in a taxable year of the foreign corporation, including its pro rata share of the assets of any corporation in which it is considered to own at least 25% of the corporation by value, are held for the production of, or produce, passive income. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents and royalties (other than certain rents or royalties derived from the active conduct of a trade or business), and gains from the disposition of passive assets.
We believe that we were a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2025 and may be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2026. Our PFIC status for our current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year is uncertain and will not be determinable until after the end of such taxable year. Accordingly, there can be no assurance with respect to our status as a PFIC for our taxable year ending December 31, 2026 or any subsequent taxable year.
121
If we are determined to be a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder of our ordinary shares or Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants, and, in the case of our ordinary shares, the U.S. Holder did not make a timely qualified electing fund or a QEF, election for our first taxable year as a PFIC in which the U.S. Holder held (or was deemed to hold) the ordinary shares, a purging election, a QEF election along with a purging election, or a mark-to-market election, each as described below, such holder generally will be subject to special rules for regular U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to:
| ● | any gain recognized by the U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of its ordinary shares or Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants; and |
| ● | any “excess distribution” made to the U.S. Holder (generally, any distributions to such U.S. Holder during a taxable year of the U.S. Holder that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by such U.S. Holder in respect of the ordinary shares during the three preceding taxable years of such U.S. Holder or, if shorter, such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares). |
Under these rules,
| ● | the U.S. Holder’s gain or excess distribution will be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares or Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants; |
| ● | the amount allocated to the U.S. Holder’s taxable year in which the U.S. Holder recognized the gain or received the excess distribution or to the period in the U.S. Holder’s holding period before the first day of our first taxable year in which we qualified as a PFIC will be taxed as ordinary income; |
| ● | the amount allocated to other taxable years (or portions thereof) of the U.S. Holder and included in its holding period will be taxed at the highest ordinary tax rate in effect for that year and applicable to the U.S. Holder; and |
| ● | the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed in respect of the tax attributable to each such other taxable year of the U.S. Holder. |
Although a determination as to our PFIC status is made annually, an initial determination that we are a PFIC generally will apply for subsequent years to a U.S. Holder that held (or was deemed to hold) our ordinary shares or Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants while we were a PFIC, whether or not we meet the test for PFIC status in those subsequent years. If we are determined to be a PFIC in any taxable year, and then cease to meet the test for PFIC status in a subsequent taxable year, a U.S. Holder may be able to make a purging election to eliminate this continuing PFIC status with respect to its ordinary shares in certain circumstances. A purging election generally creates a deemed sale of such ordinary shares at their fair market value on the last day of our tax year during which we qualified as a PFIC (or, in the case of a purging election made in connection with a QEF election, the first day of our taxable year in which qualify as a QEF with respect to such U.S. Holder). Any gain recognized by the purging election generally will be treated as an excess distribution subject to the special tax and interest charge rules described above. As a result of the purging election, the U.S. Holder generally will increase the adjusted basis in its ordinary shares by the amount of gain recognized and will also have a new holding period in its ordinary shares for purposes of the PFIC rules.
In general, if we are determined to be a PFIC, a U.S. Holder may avoid the PFIC tax consequences described above with respect to the ordinary shares by making a timely QEF election (or a QEF election along with a purging election). Pursuant to the QEF election, a U.S. Holder generally will be required to include in income its pro rata share of our net capital gains (as long term capital gain) and other earnings and profits (as ordinary income), on a current basis, in each case whether or not distributed, in the taxable year of the U.S. Holder in which or with which our taxable year ends if we are treated as a PFIC for that taxable year. However, a U.S. Holder may make a QEF election only if we agree to provide certain tax information to such holder annually. At this time, we do not intend to provide U.S. Holders with such information as may be required to make a QEF election effective. In any event, a QEF election may not be made with respect to warrant.
122
Alternatively, if a U.S. Holder, at the close of its taxable year, owns ordinary shares in a PFIC that are treated as marketable stock, the U.S. Holder may make a mark-to-market election with respect to such ordinary shares for such taxable year. If the U.S. Holder makes a valid mark-to-market election for the first taxable year of the U.S. Holder in which the U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) the ordinary shares and for which we are determined to be a PFIC, such holder generally will not be subject to the PFIC rules described above with respect to its ordinary shares as long as such shares continue to be treated as marketable stock. Instead, in general, the U.S. Holder will include as ordinary income for each year that we are treated as a PFIC the excess, if any, of the fair market value of its ordinary shares at the end of its taxable year over the adjusted tax basis in its ordinary shares. The U.S. Holder also will be allowed to take an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of its ordinary shares over the fair market value of its ordinary shares at the end of its taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market election). The U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its ordinary shares will be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amounts, and any further gain recognized on a sale or other taxable disposition of the ordinary shares in a taxable year in which we are treated as a PFIC generally will be treated as ordinary income. Special tax rules may also apply if a U.S. Holder makes a mark-to-market election for a taxable year after the first taxable year in which the U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) our ordinary shares and for which we are determined to be a PFIC. Currently, a mark-to-market election may not be made with respect to warrants.
The mark-to-market election is available only for stock that is regularly traded on a national securities exchange that is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Nasdaq Capital Market, or on a foreign exchange or market that is regulated or supervised by a governmental authority of the country in which the exchange or market is located and which (A) meets certain requirements, that are enforced by law, relating to trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, surveillance and other requirements that are designed to (i) prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, (ii) remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open, fair and orderly market and (iii) protect investors and (B) has rules that effectively promote the active trading of listed stock. Although our ordinary shares are currently listed and traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market, U.S. Holders nevertheless should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability and tax consequences of a mark-to-market election with respect to our ordinary shares under their particular circumstances.
If we are a PFIC and, at any time, have a foreign subsidiary that is classified as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder of our ordinary shares generally should be deemed to own a portion of the shares of such lower-tier PFIC, and generally could incur liability for the deferred tax and interest charge described above if we receive a distribution from, or dispose of all or part of our interest in, or the U.S. Holder were otherwise deemed to have disposed of an interest in, the lower-tier PFIC. A mark-to-market election generally would not be available with respect to such a lower-tier PFIC. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax issues raised by lower-tier PFICs.
A U.S. Holder that owns (or is deemed to own) ordinary shares in a PFIC during any taxable year of the U.S. Holder generally is required to file an IRS Form 8621 (whether or not a mark-to-market election is or has been made) with such U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax return and provide such other information as may be required by the U.S. Treasury Department. Failure to file IRS Form 8621 for each applicable taxable year may result in substantial penalties and the statute of limitations on the assessment and collection of U.S. federal income taxes of such U.S. Holder for the related taxable year may not close until three years after the date on which the required information is filed.
The rules dealing with PFICs and purging and mark-to-market elections are very complex and are affected by various factors in addition to those described above. Accordingly, U.S. Holders of our securities should consult their own tax advisors concerning the application of the PFIC rules to our securities under their particular circumstances.
Non-U.S. Holders
Cash dividends paid or deemed paid to a Non-U.S. Holder with respect to our ordinary shares generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless such dividends are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that such holder maintains or maintained in the United States).
In addition, a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain attributable to a sale or other taxable disposition of our securities unless such gain is effectively connected with its conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that such holder maintains or maintained in the United States) or the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of such sale or other disposition and certain other conditions are met (in which case, such gain from U.S. sources generally is subject to U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate or a lower applicable tax treaty rate).
123
Dividends and gains that are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that such holder maintains or maintained in the United States) generally will be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax at the same regular U.S. federal income tax rates as applicable to a comparable U.S. Holder and, in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, may also be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or a lower applicable tax treaty rate.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, information reporting for U.S. federal income tax purposes should apply to distributions made on our securities within the United States to a U.S. Holder (other than an exempt recipient) and to the proceeds from sales and other dispositions of our securities by a U.S. Holder (other than an exempt recipient) to or through a U.S. office of a broker. Payments made (and sales and other dispositions effected at an office) outside the United States will be subject to information reporting in limited circumstances. In addition, certain information concerning a U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its securities and adjustments to that tax basis and whether any gain or loss with respect to such securities is long term or short term also may be required to be reported to the IRS, and certain holders may be required to file an IRS Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets) to report their interest in our securities.
Moreover, backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax, currently at a rate of 24%, generally will apply to dividends paid on our securities to a U.S. Holder (other than an exempt recipient) and the proceeds from sales and other dispositions of our securities by a U.S. Holder (other than an exempt recipient), in each case who:
| ● | fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number; |
| ● | is notified by the IRS that backup withholding is required; or |
| ● | in certain circumstances, fails to comply with applicable certification requirements. |
A Non-U.S. Holder generally may eliminate the requirement for information reporting and backup withholding by providing certification of its foreign status, under penalties of perjury, on a duly executed applicable IRS Form W-8 or by otherwise establishing an exemption.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s or a Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding information reporting, the application of backup withholding, and the availability of and procedures for obtaining an exemption from backup withholding in their particular circumstances.
THE DISCUSSION ABOVE IS A GENERAL SUMMARY. IT DOES NOT COVER ALL TAX MATTERS THAT MAY BE OF IMPORTANCE TO A PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR. EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR IS URGED TO CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR ABOUT THE TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES, SERIES C WARRANTS OR SERIES D WARRANTS, IN EACH CASE IN LIGHT OF THE INVESTOR’S OWN CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING THE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY PROPOSED CHANGE IN APPLICABLE LAWS.
F. Dividends and paying agents
Not applicable.
124
G. Statement by experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on display
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 20-F and reports on Form 6-K. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt under the Exchange Act from, among other things, the rules prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the short swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants like us that file electronically with the SEC. You can also inspect this Annual Report on such website.
A copy of each document (or a translation thereof to the extent not in English) concerning our company that is referred to in this Annual Report is available for public view (subject to confidential treatment of certain agreements pursuant to applicable law) at our principal executive offices at Check-Cap Building, 29 Abba Hushi Avenue, P.O. Box 1271, Isfiya, 3009000, Israel.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
J. Annual Report to Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Some of our assets and liabilities are affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the NIS and between the U.S. dollar and the Euro. For example, salaries and related expenses for Israeli employees are paid in NIS and some of our suppliers are located in Europe and require payment in Euros.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the NIS decreased by 12.5% and the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Euro decreased by 2.5%. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the NIS increased by 1.09% and the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Euro increased by 5.25%. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the NIS increased by 3.07% and the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Euro decreased by 4.26%.
Interest Rate Risk
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing the interest income we receive from our investments, without increasing risk. Currently, we have short-term bank deposits, which are held primarily in interest-bearing accounts..
In addition, we invest and intend to invest our cash balances, including certain of the net proceeds from our financings pending their ultimate use, primarily in bank deposits, and fixed-income securities issued by corporations and securities issued by the U.S. and Israeli governments. We are exposed to market risks resulting from changes in interest rates relating primarily to our financial investments in cash and deposits. We do not use derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to interest rate risk. Our interest rates may decline in the future as a result of changes in the financial markets.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
125
Part II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
Not applicable.
Item 14. Material Modifications to The Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, including our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, or the Evaluation Date. Based on such evaluation, the Interim Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our management including our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) as of the Evaluation Date. Based on that evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the Evaluation Date. As all internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
(c) Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm. Not applicable (we are exempt from this requirement due to our status under the Exchange Act as a non-accelerated filer as of the current time).
(d) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Based on the evaluation conducted by our Interim Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) under the Exchange Act, our management has concluded that there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2025 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 16. [Reserved]
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Our Board of Directors has determined that Michael Hutton, a member of our audit committee is an audit committee financial expert as defined by rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and is an independent director under Nasdaq Listing Rules.
126
Item 16B. Code of Ethics.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors and employees, including our interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, controller or principal accounting officer, or other persons performing similar functions, which complies with the “code of ethics” contemplated by Item 16B of Form 20-F promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at http://ir.check-cap.com/corporate-governance. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report and is not incorporated by reference herein. If we make any amendment to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grant any waivers, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website to the extent required by the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under Item 16B of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Form 20-F, if a waiver or amendment of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and relates to standards promoting any of the values described in Item 16B(b) of Form 20-F, we will disclose such waiver or amendment on our website in accordance with the requirements of Instruction 4 to such Item 16B.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
On February 15, 2024, we received a notice of resignation from Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co., a firm in the Deloitte global network (“Brightman”), as our independent registered public accounting firm. At the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders held on April 25, 2024, our shareholders appointed Fahn Kanne & Co. as our independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2023, and until the close of the following year’s annual general meeting. On April 6, 2025, we appointed RBSM LLP to replace Fahn Kanne & Co. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2024. On December 19, 2025, we appointed BCRG Group as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2025. We intend to ratify such appointment at our next annual general meeting.
The following table represents aggregate fees billed to us for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023.
| December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Fahn Kanne & Co. | ||||||||||||
| Audit Fees (1) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 300,715 | ||||||
| Tax Fees (2) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 11,943 | ||||||
| Other Fees (3) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 17,519 | ||||||
| Subtotal | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 330,177 | ||||||
| RBSM LLP | ||||||||||||
| Audit Fees (1) | $ | — | $ | 150,000 | $ | — | ||||||
| Tax Fees (2) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| Other Fees (3) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| Subtotal | $ | — | $ | 150,000 | $ | — | ||||||
| BCRG Group | ||||||||||||
| Audit Fees (1) | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | ||||||
| Tax Fees (2) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| Other Fees (3) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| Subtotal | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 30,000 | $ | 180,000 | $ | 360,177 | ||||||
| (1) | Audit fees represent fees for professional services rendered for the audit or re-audit of our consolidated financial statements, consents, and in connection with certain of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. BCRG Group was appointed on December 19, 2025 as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2025, and subsequently re-audited and issued superseding unqualified opinions on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. BCRG Group fees attributed to 2024 and 2023 reflect re-audit services performed during 2025. RBSM LLP fees reflect their original audit of fiscal year 2024. Fahn Kanne & Co. fees reflect their original audit of fiscal year 2023. |
127
| (2) | Tax fees for the year ended December 31, 2023 were for services rendered by Fahn Kanne & Co. in connection with a tax audit and tax study. No tax fees were incurred for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. |
| (3) | Other fees for the year ended December 31, 2023 were for services rendered by Fahn Kanne & Co. in connection with a benchmark study. No other fees were incurred for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. |
Audit Committee Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
Our audit committee has adopted a pre-approval policy for the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm to perform certain audit and non-audit services. Pursuant to this policy, which is designed to assure that such engagements do not impair the independence of our auditors, the audit committee pre-approves annually a catalog of specific audit and non-audit services in the categories of audit services, audit-related services and tax services that may be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. If a type of service, that is to be provided by our auditors, has not received such general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by our audit committee. The policy prohibits retention of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform the prohibited non-audit functions defined in applicable SEC rules.
Our audit committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided to us during the periods listed above.
Item 16D. Exemptions From The Listing Standards for Audit Committees.
Not applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities By The Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.
On December 19, 2025, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee") approved the dismissal of RBSM LLP ("RBSM") as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, and the appointment of BCRG Group ("BCRG") as the Company's new independent registered public accounting firm, effective as of such date. BCRG was engaged to review the Company's interim financial statements for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025 and to serve as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for all audit and review services for subsequent periods. BCRG also re-audited the Company's consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, issuing superseding unqualified opinions for both years. The re-audit was undertaken to enable BCRG to serve as the Company's sole independent registered public accounting firm of record for current and prior periods, including for purposes of providing opinions and consents in the Company's anticipated registration statements and other securities filings. The re-audit did not result in any restatement, revision, or other change to the Company's previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 or December 31, 2023.
128
The Audit Committee's decision to dismiss RBSM was not the result of any disagreements with RBSM on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure. The audit report of RBSM on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 and the subsequent interim period through December 19, 2025, there were: (i) no disagreements with RBSM on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which if not resolved to RBSM's satisfaction would have caused it to make reference thereto in connection with its reports on the Company's financial statements; and (ii) no reportable events of the type described in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 and the subsequent interim period prior to engaging BCRG, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted with BCRG with respect to (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered with respect to the Company's consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that BCRG concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was the subject of any disagreement of the type described in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F or a reportable event of the type described in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F.
The change from Grant Thornton (the Company's predecessor auditor for the year ended December 31, 2023) to RBSM was previously reported (as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) under Item 16F of the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2024, and, accordingly, is not repeated herein.
The Company provided RBSM with a copy of the disclosures above on April 17, 2026 and requested that RBSM furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made by the Company herein in response to Item 16F(a) of Form 20-F and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. A copy of such letter, dated April 22, 2026, is filed as Exhibit 15.6 to this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
The re-audit was undertaken to enable BCRG to serve as the Company's sole independent registered public accounting firm of record for current and prior periods, including for purposes of providing opinions and consents in the Company's anticipated registration statements and other securities filings. The re-audit did not result in any restatement, revision, or other change to the Company's previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 or December 31, 2023.
129
Item 16G. Corporate Governance.
Under the Israeli Companies Law, companies incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel whose shares are publicly traded, including companies with shares listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, are considered public companies under Israeli law and are required to comply with various corporate governance requirements relating to such matters as external directors, the audit committee, the compensation committee and an internal auditor. These requirements are in addition to the corporate governance requirements imposed by the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market and other applicable provisions of U.S. securities laws to which we became subject (as a foreign private issuer) upon the closing of our initial public offering and the listing of our securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Under the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, a foreign private issuer, such as us, may generally follow its home country rules of corporate governance in lieu of the comparable requirements of the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, except for certain matters including (among others) the composition and responsibilities of the audit committee and the independence of its members within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We currently rely on this “home country practice exemption” solely with respect to the following items:
| ● | Nomination of our directors. Israeli law and our amended articles of association do not require director nominations to be made by a nominating committee of our Board of Directors consisting solely of independent directors, as required under the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Our Board of Directors elected to rely on the exemption available to foreign private issuers under the Nasdaq Listing Rules and follow Israeli law and practice with regard to the process of nominating directors, in accordance with which directors are recommended by the board of directors for election by the shareholders (other than directors elected by the board of directors to fill a vacancy). Our Board of Directors established a Nominating Committee, whose role is to select and recommend to the Board of Directors for selection, director nominees, while considering the appropriate size and composition of the Board of Directors, the requirements of applicable law regarding service as a member of our Board of Directors and the criteria for the selection of new members of the Board of Directors, and determined that our Nominating Committee need not be composed solely of independent directors (within the meaning of Nasdaq Listing Rules). However, our Nominating Committee currently consists solely of independent directors (within the meaning of Nasdaq Listing Rules). |
| ● | Compensation of officers. We follow Israeli law and practice with respect to the approval of officer compensation. While our compensation committee currently complies with the provisions of the Nasdaq Listing Rules relating to composition requirements and Israeli law generally requires that the compensation of the chief executive officer and all other executive officers be approved, or recommended to the board for approval, by the compensation committee (and in certain instances, shareholder approval is required), Israeli law includes relief from compensation committee approval in certain instances. For details regarding the approvals required under the Israeli Companies Law and regulation promulgated thereunder for the approval of compensation of the chief executive officer, all other executive officers and directors, see Item 6C “Directors, Senior Management and Employees- Board Practices - Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law - Disclosure of Personal Interests of an Office Holder and Approval of Certain Transactions”. |
| ● | Shareholder approval. We will seek shareholder approval for all corporate actions requiring such approval under the requirements of the Israeli Companies Law, rather than seeking approval for corporate actions in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635. In particular, under the Nasdaq Listing Rule, shareholder approval is generally required for: (i) an acquisition of shares/assets of another company that involves the issuance of 20% or more of the acquirer’s shares or voting rights or if a director, officer or 5% shareholder has greater than a 5% interest (or such persons collectively have a 10% or greater interest) in the target company or the assets to be acquired or the consideration to be received and the present or potential issuance of ordinary shares, or securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares, could result in an increase in outstanding common shares or voting power of 5% or more; (ii) the issuance of shares leading to a change of control; (iii) adoption/amendment of a stock option or purchase plan or other equity compensation arrangements, pursuant to which stock may be acquired by officers, directors, employees or consultants (with certain limited exception); and (iv) issuances of 20% or more of the shares or voting rights (including securities convertible into, or exercisable for, equity) of a listed company via a private placement (and/or via sales by directors/officers/5% shareholders) if such equity is issued (or sold) at below the greater of the book or market value of shares. We will seek shareholder approval for all actions requiring such under the Israeli Companies Law. Under the Israeli Companies Law, the adoption of, and material changes to, equity-based compensation plans generally require the approval of the board of directors. For details regarding the approvals required under the Israeli Companies Law for the approval of compensation of the chief executive officer, all other executive officers and directors, see Item 6C “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Board Practices -Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law - Disclosure of Personal Interests of an Office Holder and Approval of Certain Transactions.” For details regarding the approvals required under the Israeli Companies Law for the approval of transactions with and compensation of controlling shareholders, see Item 6C “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Board Practices - Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law - Disclosure of Personal Interests of Controlling Shareholders and Approval of Certain Transactions.” For details regarding the approvals required under the Israeli Companies Law for certain acquisitions of our shares and mergers, see Exhibit 2.1. “Description of Securities - Acquisitions under Israeli Law.” |
130
| ● | Quorum requirement. Under our amended and restated articles of association and as permitted under the Israeli Companies Law, a quorum for any meeting of shareholders shall be the presence of at least two shareholders present in person, by proxy or by a written ballot, who hold at least 25% of the voting power of our shares (or if a higher percentage is required by law, such higher percentage) instead of 33 1/3% of the issued share capital required under the Nasdaq Listing Rules. If the meeting was adjourned for lack of a quorum, at the adjourned meeting, at least two shareholders present in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum, unless the meeting of shareholders was convened at the demand of shareholders, in which case, the quorum shall be the presence of one or more shareholders holding at least 5% of our issued share capital and at least one percent of the voting power of our shares, or one or more shareholders with at least 5% of the voting power of our shares. |
Except as stated above, we currently intend to comply with the rules generally applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on Nasdaq. We may in the future decide to use the foreign private issuer exemption with respect to some or all of the other Nasdaq corporate governance rules. Following our home country governance practices, as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a company listed on Nasdaq, may provide less protection than is accorded to investors under Nasdaq listing requirements applicable to domestic issuers. For more information, see Item 3D “Key Information - Risk Factors Risks Related to the Company”- As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted, and intend, to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of otherwise applicable Nasdaq requirements, which may result in less protection than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic U.S. issuers.”
Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure.
Not applicable.
Item 16I. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
Item 16J. Insider Trading Policies.
We have
Item 16K. Cybersecurity.
Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy
Our cybersecurity risk management strategy focuses on several areas:
| ● | Identification and Reporting: We have implemented a comprehensive, cross-functional approach to assessing, identifying and managing material cybersecurity threats and incidents. Our program includes controls and procedures to properly identify, classify and escalate certain cybersecurity incidents to provide management visibility and obtain direction from management as to the public disclosure and reporting of material incidents in a timely manner. |
| ● | Technical Safeguards: We implements technical safeguards that are designed to protect the our information systems from cybersecurity threats, including firewalls, intrusion prevention and detection systems, anti-malware functionality, and access controls, which are evaluated and improved through vulnerability assessments and cybersecurity threat intelligence, as well as outside audits and certifications. |
131
| ● | Incident Response and Recovery Planning: We have established and maintains comprehensive incident response, business continuity, and disaster recovery plans designed to address our response to a cybersecurity incident. We conduct regular tabletop exercises to test these plans and ensure personnel are familiar with their roles in a response scenario. |
| ● | Third-Party Risk Management: We maintain a comprehensive, risk-based approach to |
| ● | Education and Awareness: We provide regular, mandatory training for all levels of employees regarding cybersecurity threats as a means to equip our employees with effective tools to address cybersecurity threats, and to communicate our evolving information security policies, standards, processes, and practices. |
We conduct periodic assessment and testing of our policies, standards, processes, and practices in a manner intended to address cybersecurity threats and events. The results of such assessments, audits, and reviews are evaluated by management and reported to the Audit Committee and the Board, and we adjust our cybersecurity policies, standards, processes, and practices as necessary based on the information provided by these assessments, audits, and reviews.
Governance
Material Effects of Cybersecurity Incidents
Risks from cybersecurity
threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, have
132
Part III
Item 17. Financial Statements
Not applicable.
Item 18. Financial Statements
Our Financial Statements are hereby incorporated herein by reference. These Financial Statements are filed as part of this Annual Report.
Item 19. Exhibits
Exhibit Index
133
| * | Filed herewith. |
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of the Registrant (File No. 333-201250). |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference to Annex B of Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities Exchange Commission on July 6, 2015. |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2016. |
| (4) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 24, 2015. |
134
| (5) | Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-1/A by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2018. |
| (6) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2018. |
| (7) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2019. |
| (8) | Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 6, 2020. |
| (9) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 22, 2020. |
| (10) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2020. |
| (11) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2020. |
| (12) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 24, 2020. |
| (13) | Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 by the Registrant with the SEC on May 20, 2020. |
| (14) | Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2016. |
| (15) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 21, 2020. |
| (16) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2021. |
| (17) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2022. |
| (18) | Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 18, 2021. |
| (19) | Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by the Registrant with the SEC on April 6, 2022. |
| (20) | Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-1/A by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2015. |
| (21) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 22, 2017. |
| (22) | Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 15, 2016. |
| (23) | Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 31, 2023. |
| (24) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 28, 2024. |
| (25) | Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed by the Registrant with the SEC on August 27, 2025. |
| (26) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the SEC on September 12, 2025. |
| (27) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 6-K filed by the Registrant with the SEC on December 22, 2025. |
135
Signatures
The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.
| Date: April 27, 2026 | CHECK-CAP LTD. | |
| By: | /s/ David Lontini | |
| Name: | David Lontini | |
| Title: | Interim Chief Executive Officer | |
| By: | /s/ Alan Lewis | |
| Name: | Alan Lewis | |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer | |
136
CHECK-CAP LTD.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024
Table of Contents
F-1
200 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 1300 Irvine, CA 92618 (714) 234-5980 www.bcrgcpas.com |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Check-Cap Ltd.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Check-Cap Ltd. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F-2
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
1. Investment in Apollo Technology Capital Corporation / Conversion of Loan Receivable to Equity Investment
As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, during 2025 the Company converted loans receivable and accrued interest due from Apollo Technology Capital Corporation (“Apollo”) into an equity investment representing approximately 7.5% of Apollo’s fully diluted equity, which the Company accounts for under ASC 321 (Investments—Equity Securities). The Company recorded a full expected credit loss allowance on the loans receivable prior to conversion. The initial carrying value of the equity investment was determined by reference to an independent third-party valuation.
We identified this as a critical audit matter due to the non-routine nature of the transaction and significant judgment required to evaluate (i) the transaction terms, (ii) classification of the investment, (iii) timing of derecognition of the loan and recognition of the investment, and (iv) initial valuation and impairment considerations. Limited observable market data increased audit complexity.
Our audit procedures included inspecting loan agreements, amendments, approvals, and conversion documents; testing loan balances, interest accrual, and conversion calculations; assessing valuation methodology and assumptions; evaluating impairment indicators at year-end; evaluating management’s accounting under ASC 321 (Investments—Equity Securities) and ASC 326 (Financial Instruments—Credit Losses) expected credit loss analysis; reviewing Apollo’s available financial information and liquidity; assessing the adequacy of the related financial statement disclosures
/s/ BCRG Group
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2025.
April 27, 2026
F-3
CHECK CAP LTD
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
| December 31, | ||||||||||
| Note | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||
| Current assets | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2(D) | $ | $ | |||||||
| Short-term Bank Deposit | 2(E) | |||||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term deposits | ||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 3 | |||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||||
| Non-current assets | ||||||||||
| Intangible Asset, net | ||||||||||
| Investments | ||||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 4 | |||||||||
| Right of Use Assets | 5 | |||||||||
| Total non-current assets | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Liabilities and shareholders’ (deficit) equity | ||||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accruals | ||||||||||
| Trade | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||
| Employees and payroll accruals | 6 | |||||||||
| Other Accrued Liabilities | ||||||||||
| Operating lease liabilities – current | 5 | |||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||||
| Non-current liabilities | ||||||||||
| Royalties provision | 8(A) | |||||||||
| Operating lease liabilities - non-current | 5 | |||||||||
| Total non-current liabilities | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 10 | |||||||||
| Share capital, Ordinary shares | ||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | $ | ||||||||
| (1) |
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of them.
F-4
CHECK CAP LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| Note | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||
| Research and development expenses, net | 12 | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Impairment of fixed assets | 4(2) | |||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||
| Impairment of loans receivable | 14 | ( | ) | |||||||||||
| Income on Debt Extinguishment and Conversion | ||||||||||||||
| Finance income, net | 15 | ( | ) | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||
| Income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) per ordinary share - basic and diluted | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding - basic and diluted | 16 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of them.
F-5
CHECK CAP LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
| Additional | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| paid-in | Accumulated | Shareholders’ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Amount | capital | deficit | Deficit | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2022 | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Changes during 2022: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU vesting | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | - | ( | ) | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Changes during 2024: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU vesting | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Changes during 2025: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares - Ghost Kitchens ARA | ||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU vesting | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2025 | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | All share amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect a 1-for-20 share reverse split, see Note 1(A)(11). |
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of them.
F-6
CHECK CAP LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
| Note | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||
| Adjustments required to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||||
| Impairment of loans receivable | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Impairment of fixed assets | ||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Financial expense (income), net | ||||||||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities items: | ||||||||||||||
| Operation leasing | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in prepaid and other current assets and non-current assets | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in trade accounts payable, accruals and other current liabilities | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Decrease in employees and payroll accruals | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Decrease in royalties provision | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Issuance of loans receivable | 1(A)8 | ( | ) | |||||||||||
| Changes (investment) in short-term bank and other deposits | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided in (used in) investing activities | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||
| Issuance of ordinary shares in the registered direct offerings, net of issuance expenses | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the year | ||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the year | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Supplemental information for Cash Flow:
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information | ||||||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment | ||||||||||||
| Assets acquired under operating lease | ||||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | ||||||||||||
| Cash paid for taxes | ||||||||||||
| Interest received | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of them.
F-7
CHECK CAP LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH TO THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET | ||||||||||||
| Cash and Cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Restricted cash included current assets | ||||||||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of them.
F-8
CHECK CAP LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTE 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION
| A. | General |
| (1) | Check Cap Ltd. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel. The registered address of its offices is 29 Abba Hushi Avenue, Isfiya 3009000, Israel. |
| (2) | The Company has three wholly-owned subsidiaries: Check-Cap US, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on May 15, 2015; Check-Cap Canada Inc., incorporated on April 9, 2024, and CC Merger Sub Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 9, 2025. |
| (3) | The Company was engaged in a clinical-stage medical diagnostics company that aimed to redefine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening through the introduction of C-Scan®, a screening test designed to detect polyps before they may transform into colorectal cancer. C-Scan uses an ultra-low dose X-ray capsule, an integrated positioning, control and recording system, as well as proprietary software to generate a 3D map of the inner lining of the colon. C-Scan is non-invasive and requires no preparation or sedation. |
| (4) | On March 21, 2023, the Company announced that the most recent efficacy results from its calibration studies did not meet the goal required to proceed to the powered portion of the U.S. pivotal study. On June 6, 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors determined it was appropriate to pursue strategic options, approved a significant reduction in workforce, discontinued the calibration studies, and concentrated resources on strategic alternatives. |
| (5) | On December 24, 2023, the Company received a notice terminating the Keystone BCA pursuant to Section 10.1(e) thereof, in light of the failure by the Company’s shareholders to approve the transaction at the December 18, 2023 Annual General Meeting. At the same meeting, the then-existing Board of Directors was replaced by five new board members. |
| (6) | Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all of its efforts to research and development, clinical trials, recruiting management and technical staff, acquiring assets, and raising capital. The Company has not yet generated revenues from operations. |
| (7) | On March 25, 2024, the Company entered into a business combination
agreement (the “Apollo BCA”) with Apollo Technology Capital Corporation (formerly known as Nobul AI Corp.) (“Apollo”),
a private Ontario corporation. Subsequently, the Company’s primary strategic focus shifted to a proposed business combination with
MBody AI Corp., a Nevada corporation (“MBody AI”) (the “Merger”). On November 17, 2025, the Company held a special
general meeting of shareholders at which approximately |
F-9
| (8) | During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company entered
into a series of financing arrangements with Apollo in connection with the Apollo BCA. On September 8, 2024, the Board approved the First
Apollo Loan ($ |
On December 23, 2024, the Board approved
the Second Apollo Loan ($
In July 2025, in connection with the
audit of the Company’s December 31, 2024 financial statements, the Company reclassified the $
Also in July 2025, management evaluated the recoverability of the Apollo Loans (First through Fourth) in accordance with ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, and recorded a full allowance for credit losses on the Apollo Loans as of December 31, 2024. As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Apollo Loans are contractually current and not in default. See Note 14.
| (9) | The Company’s ordinary shares are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “MBAI” (formerly “CHEK”, prior to December 2, 2025). The Company has conducted multiple registered direct offerings and warrant exercise transactions since its IPO on February 24, 2015. The Company’s Series A Warrants expired on February 24, 2020 and Series C Warrants expired on May 8, 2023. |
| (10) | The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Check Cap Ltd., Check-Cap US, Inc., and Check-Cap Canada Inc. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. |
| (11) | Effective November 23, 2022, the Company effected a |
| (12) | Following the October 7, 2023 attacks in Israel, the country has been involved in ongoing military conflicts. Although certain ceasefire agreements have been reached, the situation remains volatile with potential for escalation. The Company continues to monitor developments and their potential impact on operations. |
F-10
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND GOING CONCERN
| A. | Going Concern |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $
Notwithstanding net income of $
| B. | Basis of Presentation |
The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The functional currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar.
| C. | Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Check Cap Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Check-Cap US, Inc. and Check-Cap Canada Inc. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
| D. | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
| E. | Short-term Bank Deposit |
Bank deposits with original maturities of more than three months but less than twelve months are included in short-term bank deposits and bear interest at market rates.
| F. | Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives: laboratory equipment
| G. | Intangible Assets |
Intangible assets are recorded at cost and amortized on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The Ghost Kitchens ARA intangible asset, recorded at $
| H. | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset.
F-11
| I. | Investments in Equity Securities |
The Company accounts for investments in equity securities
without a readily determinable fair value under ASC 321, using the measurement alternative (cost less impairment, adjusted for observable
price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer). The Apollo equity investment of $
| J. | Research and Development Expenses |
Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred, net of participation from the Israeli Innovation Authority.
| K. | Share-Based Compensation |
The Company measures share-based compensation awards at grant-date fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
| L. | Income Taxes |
The Company uses the asset and liability method for income taxes. A full valuation allowance has been established against all deferred tax assets given the Company’s history of losses.
| M. | Loss (Earnings) Per Share |
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share equals basic in loss years as all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive.
| N. | Fair Value Measurements |
The Company applies ASC 820, using a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted prices), Level 2 (observable inputs other than Level 1), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs).
| O. | Leases |
The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC 842. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has one operating lease for office facilities in Isfiya, Israel.
| P. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
ASU 2023-07 (Segment Reporting) and ASU 2023-09 (Income Tax Disclosures) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 and 2024, respectively. The Company is evaluating their impact. No other recently issued but not yet effective pronouncements are expected to have a material impact.
| Q. | Severance Pay |
All Company employees are subject to Section 14 of the Israeli Severance Pay Law. The Company’s monthly deposits release it from future severance obligations; accordingly, no related assets or liabilities are presented on the balance sheet.
| R. | Deferred Income Taxes |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases. Given the Company’s history of losses, a full valuation allowance has been established against all deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards.
F-12
NOTE 3 – PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Composition:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Government institutions | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | ||||||||
| Deposits | ||||||||
| Other assets | ||||||||
| Total prepaid expenses and other current assets | ||||||||
NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Composition:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Cost: | ||||||||
| Office furniture and equipment | ||||||||
| Laboratory equipment | ||||||||
| Computers and auxiliary equipment | ||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation | ||||||||
| Impairment of fixed assets | ||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | ||||||||
| (1) | Depreciation expenses amounted to $ |
| (2) | Impairment of fixed assets: The Company recorded an impairment
loss of $ |
NOTE 5 – LEASES
| (1) | The Company’s office lease in Isfiya, Israel (approximately
|
| (2) | The Petach Tikva sub-lease (laboratory space) was terminated effective September 8, 2023. |
| (3) | The Petach Tikva office lease was terminated by the parties in September 2023. |
| (4) | As of December 31, 2025, operating lease right-of-use assets
and current lease liabilities were $ |
F-13
NOTE 6 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND PAYROLL ACCRUALS
| A. | Composition: |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Short-term employee benefits: | ||||||||
| Benefits for vacation and recreation pay | ||||||||
| Liability for payroll, bonuses and wages | ||||||||
| B. | Post-employment benefits |
All Company employees elected to be included under Section
14 of the Israeli Severance Pay Law. The Company’s monthly deposits at a rate of
| C. | Short-term employee benefits |
Employees are entitled to paid vacation days in accordance with the Yearly Vacation Law-1951. Accrued but unused vacation days are payable upon termination.
NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES
| A. | The Company |
Check-Cap Ltd. is taxed according to Israeli tax laws:
| 1. | Corporate tax rates in Israel |
The Israeli corporate tax rate in years 2022, 2023, 2024,
2025 and onwards is
| 2. | The Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (the “Investments Law”) |
Under the Investments Law, including Amendment No. 60 as published in April 2005, by virtue of the “Benefited Enterprise” status, the Company is entitled to various tax benefits as follows:
| a) | Reduced tax rates |
The Company has one Benefited Enterprise program under the
Investments Law, which entitles it to certain tax benefits with respect to income to be derived from its Benefited Enterprise. The Company
chose 2010 as the year of election (the “Year of Election”). Due to the location of the Company’s offices, the Company
believes it is entitled to a
| b) | Conditions for entitlement to the benefits |
The benefits available to a Benefited Enterprise are subject to the fulfillment of conditions stipulated in the Investments Law and its regulations.
| c) | Amendment of the Investments Law |
The Investments Law was amended as part of the Economic Policy Law for the years 2011-2012, passed by the Israeli Knesset on December 29, 2010 (the “Capital Investments Law Amendment”). The Capital Investments Law Amendment set alternative benefit tracks. Under the transitional provisions, the Company was entitled to elect that the Capital Investments Law Amendment applies; however, the Company elected not to have the Capital Investments Law Amendment apply to the Company.
On December 22, 2016, the Knesset approved amendment number
73 to the Investments Law introducing reduced corporate tax rate tracks of
In accordance with the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance [New Version], 1961, as of December 31, 2025, all of the Company’s tax assessments through tax year 2017 are considered final. Tax years 2018 through 2025 remain open to examination by the Israeli Tax Authority.
F-14
| B. | Check-Cap US, Inc. |
Check-Cap US, Inc. is taxed according to U.S. tax laws at
a federal rate of
Check-Cap US, Inc. had net operating loss carryforwards
as of December 31, 2025 (December 31, 2024: $
Utilization of any U.S. NOL carryforwards may be subject to substantial annual limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, due to ownership changes that have occurred or could occur in the future. The Company has not completed a detailed study to determine whether such ownership changes have occurred.
| C. | Deferred income taxes |
As of December 31, 2025, Check-Cap Ltd. has accumulated
Israeli net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $
As of December 31, 2025, Check-Cap US, Inc. has U.S. federal or state net operating loss carryforwards.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Based on the Company’s history of losses, its cessation of operations in June 2023, the absence of revenue since that date, and the absence of objectively verifiable projections of future taxable income, the Company has established a full valuation allowance against all net operating loss carryforwards. The Company does not expect to pay taxes in Israel until it has taxable income sufficient to fully utilize its carryforward tax losses.
Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||||||
| NOL carryforwards – Israel (at | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| NOL carryforwards – U.S. (at | ||||||||||||
| Total gross deferred tax asset | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Valuation Allowance | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
| Net Deferred Tax Asset | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
All amounts in USD thousands. The Israeli NOL DTA is
computed at the
Movement in accumulated Israeli net operating loss carryforwards:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Israeli NOL Rollforward (USD thousands) | ||||||||
| Opening accumulated Israeli NOL | $ | $ | ||||||
| Current year estimated tax loss | $ | $ | ||||||
| Closing accumulated Israeli NOL | $ | $ | ||||||
The current year tax loss is estimated from the GAAP
net income/(loss) after the following adjustments applied consistently in both years: (i) the Apollo loan impairment charge of $
F-15
Movement in valuation allowance:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Valuation Allowance Rollforward (USD thousands) | ||||||||
| Opening valuation allowance | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Increase — current year tax loss × | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Closing accumulated Israeli NOL | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
The Company has not recorded any liability for unrecognized
tax benefits under ASC 740 as of December 31, 2025 or 2024, and does not anticipate significant changes in uncertain tax positions within
the next
| D. | Current tax provision |
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Current: | ||||||||
| Federal (U.S.) | $ | $ | ||||||
| State (U.S.) | ||||||||
| Foreign — Israel | ||||||||
| Total current tax provision | $ | $ | ||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||
| Federal (U.S.) | $ | $ | ||||||
| State (U.S.) | ||||||||
| Foreign — Israel | ||||||||
| Total deferred tax benefit | $ | $ | ||||||
| Total provision (benefit) for income taxes | $ | $ | ||||||
| E. | Reconciliation of theoretical to actual tax expense |
The following table reconciles the statutory Israeli corporate tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate:
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Statutory Israeli corporate tax rate | % | % | ||||||
| Effect of full valuation allowance on NOL carryforwards | ( | )% | ( | )% | ||||
| Other permanent differences (immaterial) | ||||||||
| Effective tax rate | % | % | ||||||
The Company generated no taxable income in Israel or the United States in 2025 or 2024. No income taxes were paid in either jurisdiction in 2025 or 2024. The primary reconciling item between the statutory rate and the effective rate is the full valuation allowance established against all net operating loss carryforwards, reflecting management’s conclusion that it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized given the Company’s history of losses, absence of revenue since June 2023, and the uncertainty of future taxable income pending completion of the merger
F-16
NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
| A. | Royalties provision |
| 1. | Royalties to an ASIC designer: The Company had a liability to
pay royalties of |
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Royalties to an ASIC designer | ||||||||
| 2. | Reimbursement liability to Predecessor Entity’s unit holders: The Company committed to reimburse unit holders of Check Cap LLC for tax burdens arising from the 2009 reorganization under Section 367(d) of the Code. Since no profitability is expected, the liability based on discounted cash outflows is . |
| B. | Commitments |
| (1) | Royalties – IIA and BIRD Foundation: Since inception through
December 31, 2023, the Company received IIA funding of approximately $ |
| (2) | Rental agreements: See Note 5. |
| C. | Legal |
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The following legal proceedings were outstanding as of December 31, 2025.
Derivative action. On October
7, 2024, a minority shareholder of the Company filed an application in the Haifa District Court seeking certification of a shareholders’
derivative lawsuit against the Company, certain present and former directors, and a third party, seeking damages in excess of NIS
Former executive compensation claims.
During 2024, two former senior executives filed separate claims against the Company seeking an aggregate of approximately NIS
Legal fee dispute. During 2024,
a former legal services provider filed a claim against the Company seeking approximately NIS
Lease and eviction proceedings. In
September 2024, the Company ceased making rent payments in respect of its leased premises in Usfiyeh, Israel. The landlord subsequently
commenced legal proceedings and an eviction order was granted by the court. The Company has ceased active business operations at the facility.
Certain Company property and documentation remain on the premises pending resolution of access and logistical matters. The landlord’s
claim for unpaid rent and damages totals approximately NIS
Management’s assessment. For all of the above matters, based on the information currently available and after consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe an unfavorable outcome is probable for any of the above proceedings. Accordingly, no provision has been recorded in these consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2025. Management will reassess at each reporting date and will record a provision in the period in which it becomes probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
F-17
NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In accordance with ASC 820, the Company measures financial instruments at fair value using a three-level hierarchy. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis through the income statement.
Equity Investment in Apollo Technology
Capital Corporation — ASC 321. The Company holds an equity investment in Apollo Technology Capital Corporation (“Apollo”),
representing approximately
NOTE 10 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| A. | General |
Effective November 23, 2022, the Company effected a
| B. | Ordinary shares |
| 1. | Ordinary shares confer upon their holders the right to receive
dividends, to participate in liquidation distributions, and |
| 2. | Changes in ordinary share capital: The Company has conducted
multiple offerings from 2015 through 2022, including its IPO (February 2015), warrant exercises, and registered direct offerings. As
of December 31, 2024, |
CLA Warrants to purchase
NOTE 11 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
| A. | General |
The Company grants options and RSUs under the 2006 Plan and the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (including the 2015 U.S. Sub-Plan). No new options or RSUs were granted during 2025 or 2024. As of December 31, 2025, the same number of options and RSUs remain outstanding as at December 31, 2024, with no forfeitures or exercises occurring in 2025.
| B. | Details of share-based grants |
The last options were granted on March 30, 2023 (
F-18
| C. | Options Fair Value – Black-Scholes parameters |
The parameters used in applying the Black-Scholes model are as follows:
| For the year ended December 31, 2025 | For the year ended December 31, 2024 | For the year ended December 31, 2023 | ||||||||
| Expected volatility | % | |||||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | |||||||||
| Dividend yield | % | |||||||||
| Expected term (years) | ||||||||||
| Share price | $ | |||||||||
| D. |
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Research and development, net | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||
| General and administrative, net | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||
| Total | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | |||||
| E. | Option activity |
Year ended December 31, 2025:
Number | Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price ($) | Wtd. Avg. Remaining Life (yrs) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000s) | |||||||||||||
| Options outstanding – beginning of year | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Options granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeited | ||||||||||||||||
| Options exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding – end of year | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Options exercisable – end of year | $ | |||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2024:
Number | Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price ($) | Wtd. Avg. Remaining Life (yrs) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000s) | |||||||||||||
| Options outstanding – beginning of year | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Options granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeited | ||||||||||||||||
| Options exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding – end of year | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Options exercisable – end of year | $ | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | Weighted average grant date fair values: 2023: $ |
| (2) | As of December 31, 2025, all outstanding options ( |
F-19
| F. |
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Unvested – beginning of year | ||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||
| Vested | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Forfeited | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Unvested – end of year | ||||||||||||
| (3) | No RSUs were granted in 2025 or 2024. Weighted average grant
date fair value of RSUs awarded during 2022 was $ |
| (4) | As of December 31, 2025, unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested arrangements is approximately $– (all prior grants are fully vested or their remaining cost is immaterial). |
NOTE 12 – RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES, NET
Composition:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Salaries and related expenses | ||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Materials | ||||||||||||
| Subcontractors and consultants | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||
| Cost for registration of patents | ||||||||||||
| Others | ||||||||||||
| Less participation of the IIA | ||||||||||||
| Total research and development expenses, net | ||||||||||||
NOTE 13 – GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Composition:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Salaries and related expenses | ||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation, net | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Professional services* | ||||||||||||
| Office rent and maintenance | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||
| Amortization | ||||||||||||
| Others | ||||||||||||
| Total general and administrative expenses | ||||||||||||
| * |
F-20
NOTE 14 – IMPAIRMENT OF LOANS RECEIVABLE AND GAIN ON DEBT EXTINGUISHMENT
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company entered
into a series of financing arrangements with Apollo (Apollo) totaling $
During the six months ended June 30, 2025, management reversed
the full impairment allowance and reinstated the loan receivable at $
Composition:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Impairment of loans receivable | ||||||||||||
| Gain on debt extinguishment and conversion | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Net | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||
NOTE 15 – FINANCE INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
Composition:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Interest income on short-term deposits and other | ||||||||||||
| Bank fees and interest expenses | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Changes in provision for royalties | ||||||||||||
| Exchange rate differences | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Changes in fair value of derivatives | ||||||||||||
| Total financing income, net | ( | ) | ||||||||||
F-21
NOTE 16 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share equals basic in periods of net loss, as all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive. In periods of net income, diluted EPS reflects the dilutive effect of outstanding options and warrants, to the extent dilutive.
All outstanding options and warrants were excluded from the 2024 and 2023 diluted loss per share calculations as their effect was anti-dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2025, outstanding options and warrants are out of the money and accordingly also excluded from diluted EPS.
Computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||
| Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding – basic and diluted | ||||||||||||
| Earnings (loss) per ordinary share – basic and diluted | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||
Note: Weighted average shares for 2025 reflect the issuance
of
Anti-dilutive instruments excluded from diluted EPS:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| (number) | ||||||||||||
| Warrants and share options | ||||||||||||
NOTE 17 – RELATED PARTIES
| A. |
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Fees, including reimbursement of expenses | ||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | ||||||||||||
| B. | Transactions with related parties: |
Sigalit Kimchy: No consulting fees were paid to Sigalit Kimchy (wife of Yoav Kimchy, the Company’s Chief Technology Officer) during the year ended December 31, 2025. Ms. Kimchy had previously served as marcom and user interface lead under an employment agreement dated April 4, 2016.
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Consulting fees, including share-based compensation and reimbursement of expenses | ||||||||||||
F-22
NOTE 18 – APOLLO TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL CORPORATION – LOAN RECEIVABLE, EXCHANGE, AND EQUITY INVESTMENT
Background
The Company holds an equity investment in Apollo Technology Capital
Corporation (“Apollo”, formerly Apollo AI Corp.), a technology-driven AI marketplace platform connecting homebuyers, real
estate agents, and mortgage providers across North American residential real estate markets. The investment arose from the conversion
of a series of loan receivables from Apollo (the “Exchange Indebtedness”) with aggregate principal of USD
Initial Impairment – Year Ended December 31, 2024
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company fully impaired its loan receivable from Apollo under ASC 310 and ASC 326, reducing the net carrying value to , reflecting Apollo’s financial distress, recurring operating losses, and negative working capital at that date.
Reversal of Impairment and Loan Reinstatement – Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
During the six months ended June 30, 2025, management determined that
the impairment indicators no longer existed and reinstated the recoverable portion of the loan at USD
Debt-for-Equity Exchange – November 14, 2025
On June 30, 2025, the (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Apollo
under which the Exchange Indebtedness would be exchanged for common shares of Apollo representing a
On November 14, 2025, the Company derecognized the loan receivable
of USD
Equity Investment – Classification and Subsequent Measurement
The equity investment is classified as an equity security under ASC
321. The Company holds
The investment is carried at cost of USD
F-23
Impairment Assessment – December 31, 2025
At December 31, 2025, management performed a qualitative impairment
assessment supported by an independent external valuation report, effective date December 31, 2025. The valuation concluded a Fair Market
Value of CAD
Check-Cap’s
Carrying Value Summary (USD)
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Loan receivable – gross principal | $ | $ | ||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net loan receivable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Equity investment in Apollo (at cost) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Payable to Apollo | $ | $ | ||||||
NOTE 19 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through January 1, 2026 and the date on which these consolidated financial statements were issued, and has determined that there are no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in these consolidated financial statements.
F-24