Welcome to Monroe Capital Corporation's First Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. Before we begin, I'd like to take a moment to remind our listeners that remarks made during this call today may contain certain forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our goals, strategies, beliefs, future potential, operating results or cash flows particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although, we believe these statements are reasonable based on management's estimates, assumptions and projections, these statements are not guarantees of future performance. Furthermore, time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate as of the time of any replay or listening. Actual results may differ materially as a result of risks, uncertainty or other factors, including but not limited to the risk factors described from time to time in the company's filings with the SEC. Monroe Capital takes no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements. I will now turn the conference over to Ted Koenig, Chief Executive Officer of Monroe Capital Corporation. Sir, you may now begin.

Good morning and thank you to everyone who has joined us on our call today. Welcome to our first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. I am joined by Aaron Peck, our CFO and Chief Investment Officer; and also Mick Solimene, our Senior Portfolio Manager for MRCC. Last evening we issued our first quarter 2022 earnings press release and filed our 10-Q with the SEC. After a very strong fourth quarter in 2021, activity during the first quarter of 2022 slowed in the M&A and financing markets. In addition, both risk premiums and volatility increased across asset classes as concerns about the impact of inflation and global growth, a more aggressive Fed tone, ongoing supply chain issues, and geopolitical unrest in Russia and Ukraine moved investors to the sidelines, especially in the more liquid markets. In 2021, sponsored middle market loan volume grew by over 82% year-over-year according to Refinitiv and we expect the trend of direct lenders taking market share from traditional institutional lending sources will continue, especially during periods of market uncertainty like today when issuers are seeking certainty of execution. Monroe's ability to offer underwritten solutions is a real advantage for our clients during a variety of market environments. Our pipeline of quality actionable financing opportunities at the platform level remains very strong in the face of today's more uncertain market backdrop. Turning now to the first quarter results. We are pleased to report adjusted net investment income of $5.4 million or $0.25 per share. We also reported NAV of $244.9 million or $11.30 per share as of March 31, 2022, a decrease of $0.21 per share from NAV of $249.5 million or $11.51 per share as of December 31, 2021. A modest decline in NAV was primarily the result of a one-time book loss and the extinguishment of debt associated with the redemption of the remaining SBA debentures during the quarter and net unrealized losses on the portfolio. During the quarter, MRCC's debt-to-equity leverage decreased slightly from 1.35 times debt-to-equity to 1.30 times debt to equity. This modest decrease in leverage was primarily driven by a decrease in size of the portfolio as a result of portfolio syndication and repayment activity near the end of the quarter. New origination activity at Monroe remains strong and we expect a modestly increased leverage to within our targeted leverage range of 1.3 times to 1.4 times debt to equity. As we have discussed on prior calls, our continued focus is on making new investments with attractive risk-return dynamics, while proactively managing and constructing our portfolio. We believe that our existing portfolio companies will be able to navigate a higher interest rate environment and they are generally well-positioned to manage the inflationary supply chain and geopolitical headwinds they are facing. Our loan underwriting focus continues to be on those companies with defendable market positions, resilient business models, exceptional management teams and strong sponsors or owners. MRCC enjoys a strategic advantage in being affiliated with a best-in-class middle market private credit asset management firm, with approximately $13.5 billion in assets under management, and over 160 employees as of March 31, 2022. We will continue to focus on generating adjusted net investment income that meets or exceeds our dividend and positive long-term NAV performance. I am now going to turn the call over to Aaron, who is going to walk you through our financial results.

Thank you, Ted. As of March 31, 2022, our investment portfolio totaled $546 million, down $15.7 million from $561.7 million as of December 31, 2021. Our investment portfolio consisted of debt and equity investments in 97 portfolio companies at March 31, 2022, as compared to debt and equity investments in 96 portfolio companies at December 31. During the quarter we made investments in three new portfolio companies, with loan funding totaling $5.6 million. In addition, we had revolver add-on or delayed draw fundings to existing portfolio companies totaling $16 million. During the quarter we received three full payoffs totaling $22.4 million and had loan sales and other ordinary course loan repayments aggregating $13.8 million. At March 31, 2022, we had total borrowings of $318.3 million, including $188.3 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility and $130 million of our 2026 notes. Total borrowings outstanding decreased by $19.6 million, primarily as a result of portfolio repayments and syndications near the end of the quarter. We are well situated to continue to carefully grow our portfolio through participating in the substantial pipeline of opportunities generated at Monroe. The revolving credit facility had $66.7 million of availability as of March 31, subject to borrowing base capacity. Turning to our results, for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, adjusted net investment income, a non-GAAP measure was $5.4 million or $0.25 per share, compared to $5.4 million or $0.25 per share in the prior quarter. When considering our target leverage and current credit performance at MRCC, we believe that on a run-rate basis our adjusted NII can cover the $0.25 per share quarterly all other things being equal. As of March 31, our net asset value was $244.9 million which decreased from the $249.5 million in net asset value as of December 31. And our NAV per share decreased from $11.51 per share at December 31 to $11.30 per share as of March 31. The $0.21 per share NAV decrease was substantially the result of a loss on the extinguishment of debt associated with the redemption of the remaining SBA debentures during the quarter and net unrealized losses on the portfolio. I will now turn it over to Mick Solimene, who will provide some more details on our first quarter operating performance.

Thank you, Aaron. Looking to our statement of operations, total investment income was $12.5 million during the first quarter, down from $13 million in the fourth quarter due to lower fee income and reduced pre-payment gains. During the first quarter, we placed no additional borrowers on non-accrual status. Total non-accruals approximate 2.2% of the portfolio, at fair value at March 31, down from 2.6% of the portfolio at fair value at December 31, 2021 and 4.1% of the portfolio at fair value at December 31, 2020. At March 31, 2022, the effective yield on our debt and preferred equity portfolio was 8%, unchanged from December 31, 2021. LIBOR rates, which had been at historically low levels, rose during the quarter with three-month LIBOR at approximately 95 basis points as of March 31 versus approximately 21 basis points as of December 31. We maintain LIBOR floors in nearly all our deals with the majority of floors at a level of at least 1%. All other things being equal, a rising interest rate environment will improve the yield on our investment portfolio and increase net investment income as market LIBOR levels exceed floor LIBOR levels. On most amendments and on virtually all of our newly-originated deals, we are focused on pricing our deals spread to the secured overnight financing rate or SOFR in advance of LIBOR going away, which is anticipated to occur in 2023. Moving to the expense side. Total expenses for the quarter decreased from $7.6 million in the fourth quarter to $7.1 million in the first quarter, primarily due to lower incentive fees, net of associated fee waivers as a result of lower net investment income. Net realized losses for the first quarter totaled $1.1 million, primarily related to the one-time book loss on the repayment of the SBA debentures, which represented the unamortized deferred financing costs under debentures at the time of their repayment. Net change in unrealized losses for the quarter totaled $3.4 million. As discussed earlier, on March 1, the MRCC SBIC subsidiary repaid all its remaining SBA debentures and transferred its loan positions to MRCC. This was achieved through borrowings on our revolving credit facility with ING and the use of the restricted cash which was on hand in our SBIC subsidiary. While the repayment of the SBA debentures increased the level of regulatory leverage at MRCC, it slightly reduced total leverage all other things being equal. In recent quarters, we have had substantial restricted cash in the SBIC subsidiary resulting from loan repayments, which could only be used to repay SBA debentures on a semi-annual basis. The full repayment of our SBA debentures will help reduce drag associated with the large cash balance previously held at the subsidiary and positively impact net investment income going forward. As of March 31, the SLF had investments in 60 different borrowers aggregating $195.3 million at fair value with a weighted average interest rate of 6%. The SLF had borrowings under its non-recourse credit facility of $120.1 million and $54.9 million of available capacity under this credit facility subject to borrowing base availability. I will now turn the call back to Ted for some closing remarks before we open the line for questions.

Thanks, Mick. In closing, while there are a number of headwinds that are creating today's market uncertainty, we feel that MRCC is well-positioned to deliver differentiated risk-adjusted returns for our shareholders. Our overall Monroe Capital platform continues to remain a very strong -- maintain a very strong pipeline of high-quality investment opportunities for all funds at Monroe including MRCC. As an example, we put to work over $6.5 billion at the Monroe Capital platform in 2021. We remain highly selective focusing on market-leading businesses with high free cash flow and will continue our conservative underwriting model, where we generally fund less than 5% of all the deals we review on an annual basis. We have constructed a purposefully defensive portfolio under the watch of a tenured senior leadership team and we benefit from a large portfolio management organization that has managed credit through multiple economic cycles going back to the year 2000 over 20 years ago. As a result, we remain confident that our dividend, which is currently at a yield of approximately 10%, can be supported by consistent adjusted net investment income. We are excited about our investment portfolio and our prospects to continue to believe that Monroe Capital Corporation, which is affiliated with an award-winning best-in-class external manager of Monroe Capital, provides a very attractive investment opportunity to our shareholders and other investors. Thank you all for your time today and this concludes our prepared remarks. I'm going to ask the operator to open the call now for questions. Thank you.

Thank you, speakers. Participants, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of Christopher Nolan of Ladenburg Thalmann. Your line is now open.

Okay, given all of the moving pieces in the economy supply chain, inflation likely Fed tightenings and also your stock is trading below book, what are your thoughts in terms of the capital structure? Are you going to look for more fixed-rate notes? Is a share repurchase in consideration? Any details would be helpful.

Thanks, Christopher. Good question. Everything is on the table, Christopher. We're looking at all options to increase shareholder value. So I will tell you that as soon as we make a decision, you will know. But right now our platform is humming. As I said in my prepared remarks, we put $6.5 billion to work in 2021, and in the first quarter of 2022, we're almost at $2 billion across the platform and we see demand coming from traditional buyouts, liquidity investments, and secondary events. And right now we're navigating what's the best way for MRCC to participate in those transactions and increase value.

Great. And my follow-up question is on asset quality. Your asset quality has really improved over the last quarters. Will – if you can get your non-accruals down to let's say less than 1% of investments of cost, would – and your income would actually go up, would you start lowering the overall balance sheet leverage?

Another good question. I told you this several quarters ago that our number one goal is to get our hands around collecting some of the underperforming assets. And I think we've proven that if you look at where we were two years ago, if you look at where we were a year ago, we've done exactly what we said we were going to do. So I anticipate we will continue to make progress on that front in 2022. And once we do that, I think you're going to see income go up. I think you'll see a lot of good things from MRCC and we can make those decisions as appropriate.

Great.

And I'll just add, Chris. On the leverage side, I don't think we're really looking at leverage as tied to what happens with our non-accrual assets. So I don't think you would see any material change in our leverage strategy with regards to a reduction in non-accruals. I think we would continue to be targeting the range that Mick talked about in our presentation of 1.3 to 1.4 times total leverage. That's the current expectation.

Okay. Thanks.

Hi, good morning and thank you for taking my question. First question, originations were understandably light in the first quarter, given the slowdown in M&A activity and a seasonally slower quarter overall. Can you give us a sense how origination activity is tracking so far this quarter?

Yes, I can do that. I can talk about the platform. I mean we're seeing a fair amount of demand still. Usually what happens is Q1 and Q2 are heavy-demand quarters, and then things slow a little bit in Q3 and then they pick up in Q4. We're seeing a little bit of a drop off in Q2 from Q1 and I think that's got to do with more with interest rates rising and some uncertainty over the future in the near-term. There's $2.2 trillion of private equity dry powder sitting on the sidelines and there's about $750 billion of dry powder in private credit. So that's a 3:1 ratio in private equity dry powder to private credit dry powder, where usually the cake-making recipe is kind of a 1:1. So there's going to be a big tailwind behind private credit. It's I think a function of just getting comfortable with the market. There are a bunch of industries that are doing well that had, kind of, a COVID bump. There are other industries that have had a COVID challenge and we've transitioned our portfolio pretty much towards more of a market economy, business services, software, things that generate consistent earnings and defensible positions. So I think we'll continue to see a steady stream of new business and originations. I know our pipeline internally has -- out through the end of Q2 and into Q3 a pretty full list of deals. And it's really going to be a geopolitical question, I think. If you see more activity coming out of Russia and Ukraine, which is what the newspapers are quoting this morning, I think that's going to potentially be a driver for a more measured approach to deal flow in the U.S.

And Kevin I'll just add. MRCC specifically, we don't need to put a lot of new assets into MRCC to hit our targeted leverage. I think the challenge is always, and we talk about this every quarter, is we can absolutely control what comes in the front door, but it's more difficult to control what goes out the back door. So we try to allocate deals MRCC that are both accretive on the yield side, accretive from a diversity standpoint, accretive from all things Ted talked about that are positive from an industry choice based on the environment we're in. But we just don't know what's going to come out of the back door and oftentimes it comes out on the refinancing side at the very end of the quarter. And so it shows up in our ending quarter leverage. It's very common. We see those repayments at end of month or end of quarter. So we're still feeling really good even with reduced origination activity should that be the case that we should have plenty of opportunities that fit MRCC to grow our portfolio and then just a matter of whether the refinancing activity slows down on what's currently on MRCC.

Okay. That makes sense. I appreciate your comments there. And then just a follow-up. In regards to portfolio positioning, are there any pockets or industries that you find particularly attractive in the current climate?

Yes. I'll take a quick run at that and then Aaron you can follow up if you want. We really like recurring revenue right now and these tend to be data, iCloud, subscription-based models, business service-based models because we found that during COVID those industries tended to perform the best and we're able to best predict the future in those industries. Long-term contracts, sticky revenues, sticky supply relationships, key business services, key software elements for businesses. That was a very good place to be during COVID and we had really ramped up our -- as a platform our firm's exposure in those areas and we reduced our exposure to the highly cyclical industries relating to transport, travel, leisure, and some of the elective health, and we continue to feel we're in the right spot going forward.

Yes. And I would just add, Ted, we still also like to invest in what we believe are non-correlated businesses which takes advantage of some of the flow that we see in specialty finance, litigation finance, and some of the less traditional assets which we put into all of our vehicles on a measured basis. So that's a nice yield pickup and adds non-correlated risk so we carefully and selectively will add some of that origination and have been for many years.

Okay. Great. I'll leave it there. Congratulations on the quarter.

Thanks, Kevin.

[Operator Instructions] Speakers the next question is from the line of Robert Dodd of Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Hi guys. Going back to a topic you kind of touched on Ted, on improvements in asset quality, right? I mean the non-accruals have come down. You've made a lot of progress. You indicated that you expect to make additional progress this year. Can you give us any -- without giving anything away I guess any color on what your comfort level is on where that kind of progress is going to come from? I mean obviously you eventually got marked down a little bit in the quarter, but that happens. But what are the dynamics that make you confident that you're going to see continued progress in those few coupled assets that are left?

I think it's a good question and it's a particularly relevant question for you, Robert. Because two years ago you and I had this discussion on one of these calls and I promised you then that we were going to deal with this aggressively and that was my number one priority. And we've dealt with it aggressively and exactly what I said at the time two years ago has occurred. We've got a -- we've got a few credits, not a lot, but a few credits that we're very focused on. And as I've mentioned to you before, as opposed to moving them out at a mark or less, we've decided as a firm, the best thing to do is to generate the highest possible recovery that we can in those assets. Now, mind you these assets are not only in MRCC. Many and most of all these assets are in other funds across the firm. MRCC has a small position; other investment funds have larger positions. We have a portfolio management team of 10 people that are focused on our watchlist in our call it high-risk credits. And it's as good of a team as there is in the industry. And if you look at what we've been able to do over the last two years in bringing that exposure in instances where private equity firms for one reason or another have decided not to invest. And we've taken over and very often changed out management, changed direction, changed direction of businesses, added businesses, acquired businesses, supplemented management, brought in consulting, brought in new investment strategies. Across the board, our work I think has been validated by the success we've had in the last two years. We've got a couple of positions left that we're making good progress on. There's a number of alternative decisions we're going to be making here over the next few quarters. And I'm hopeful that because of the hard work we've done over the last couple of years that we're going to see some good results, some nice results. So, I can't tell you that's a linear focus. But if you look at the last two years, we've made a heck of a progress on reducing this. And my goal, like you say, is to get this down below 1% here in the near-term.

I appreciate that and I do remember the conversation a while back. One additional one if I can. I mean you mentioned new recurring revenue loans. I mean Monroe, the platform has, if I remember right, a recurring revenue dedicated fund. Obviously, MRCC can participate in those deals as well etc. How do you think you're positioned relative -- in your approach to ARR versus obviously at the large end of this mega-platforms out there doing multibillion-dollar LBOs for SaaS businesses that you're not necessarily participating or focusing? I mean, you can, but you're not leading those kind of deals currently. How does your approach differ from that mega-end of the market?

Yes, good question. There are about a half dozen platforms, Monroe being one of them, that have developed a real expertise in SaaS lending and in ARR lending and in software. Like everything, we've chosen the market that we want to play in and the market that we like to play in is the more fragmented middle market, lower middle marketplace. So as opposed to underwriting several billion-dollar transactions of SaaS investments, we're underwriting $200 million to $300 million to $400 million investments in the SaaS area. These are high-quality companies with high-quality sponsors. Very often some of the larger sponsors with dual strategies, one at the higher end of the market, one at the lower end of the market to build these companies. As a way -- the way SaaS companies get built today, it's very hard to go acquire a platform because most of these platforms are trading at 12 times to 13 times to 14 times revenue today. So the way most of the private equity firms are building SaaS platforms is to start with the smaller firms, something that they can acquire for between $200 million and $500 million. And again remember it's usually 30% or so debt and 70% equity and then doing a number of add-on transactions, tuck-ins, bolt-ons, to create a very large platform. And we are very, very involved in that business. We did as a platform last year about $2.5 billion in investments in this space. We have a dedicated team based in San Francisco and Chicago, with origination sourcing and underwriting credit, self-contained in that team. And then the larger Monroe platform brings its underwriting and consistent credit expertise to bear and it's a significant part of our portfolio. I'd say probably of our $14 billion $15 billion today, we're probably close to 25% 30% in this asset class. So it's an important part of the overall term, MRCC shares and all of those deals and they've been our best-performing deals, if you look at the last four or five years in the firm.

I appreciate that color. Thank you, Ted.

Thank you participants. I'll now turn the conference back over to CEO Ted Koenig for final remarks.

Thank you all for joining us today. As I promised to you, we're going to continue to block and tackle and do what we do best which is generate current return. I appreciate the questions. I appreciate the line of questions, even if they're multi-year questions as Robert and I talk to from time to time. And I'm very much looking forward to speaking to all of you again next quarter. In the meantime, look for Aaron and Mick to reach out intra-quarter to check further and provide you any more information that you'd like on a one-on-one basis. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.