Welcome to the Opera Limited First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during this period, you will need to press star 1 on your telephone keypad. If you want to remove yourself from the queue, please press star 2. Please be advised that today's call is being recorded. Lastly, if you should need operator assistance, please press star zero. I would now like to turn the call over to your speaker today, Matt Wolfson, Head of Investor Relations. Please begin.

Thank you for joining us. This morning, I am joined by our CEO, Song Lin, and our CFO, Rhoda Jacobson. Before I hand over the call to Song Lin, I would like to remind you that some of the statements that we make today regarding our business, operations, and financial performance may be considered forward-looking. Such statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially as a result of various factors, including those set forth in today's earnings press release and in our most recent annual report on Form 20F filed with the SEC. We undertake no obligations to update any forward-looking statements. During this call, we will present both IFRS and non-IFRS financial measures. A reconciliation of IFRS to non-IFRS measures is included in today's earnings press release. The earnings price release and accompanying investor presentation are available on our investor relations website at investor.opera.com. Our comments will be on a year-over-year comparison unless we state otherwise. With that, let me turn the call over to our CEO, Song Lin, who will cover our first quarter operational highlights and strategy, and then Frodo Jacobson will discuss the details of our financials and expectations for the second

quarter and full year. Song? Sure. Thank you, Matt, and good day, everyone. It's been less than two months since we reported our fourth quarter 2025 results with the trajectory for 2026 well ahead of internal expectations, and today we announced that we surpassed even those recent forecast. Q1 revenue exceeded the high end of our guidance range by $4 million and adjusted EBITDA exceeded the high end of our guidance range by $2 million. That translated to year-over-year revenue growth of 23% to $176 million with $42 million adjusted EBITDA, or a 24% margin. It is also worth noting that revenue growth was comparable across advertising and query revenue, and 24% and 23% respectively, both contributing to an excellent starting position for the remainder of the year. On the advertising side, first-color revenue was a new all-time high of $117 million. Our momentum and underlying growth was strong enough to more than offset seasonality. Our advertising partners run performance-based campaigns, so we would not see this level of growth if our partners were not also experiencing success. As a result, we are able to continue increasing our share of wallets with a continued focus on scaling our e-commerce partnerships. As an example, just two weeks ago, we were awarded Affiliate of the year from AliExpress, and in late 2025, we received a similar recognition from Shopee, another key partner. We are humbled by the appreciation shown and operate Opera Ads with their continued success as a North Star. Our partners appreciate the three core pillars of opera ads. First is a unified media technology ecosystem that combines our own ad inventory augmented with the wider programmatic landscape and advanced targeting algorithms to deliver hyper relevant placements and the precise moment of user intent. Second is consistent execution that delivers daily volume without sacrificing quality. And finally, a deep collaborative alignment that fosters a transparent, closely aligned working relationship with our partners. Working with such global partners will translate demonstrated performance in active markets to continued regional expansion. And while e-commerce opportunities will only increase as the year progresses, I'm also excited about taking our learnings from that vertical and applying it more broadly. For example, as we enter the travel-heavy second and third callers, we see a clear potential to establish opera ads as a source of well-targeted audiences for the travel industry. All in all, there is no shortage of opportunity, and it's all about execution to deliver the best results for our partners. Within the 23% growth of query revenue, search revenue growth continued expanding and reached 14% in the caller, a level we have not seen since 2024. The remainder of query growth was driven by non-search query revenue, which continues to be multiple times larger than the year-ago caller, where its underlying growth also offsetting seasonality. In total, query revenue was $58 million in the first quarter and representing 33% of our revenue. As we've discussed before, the AI age comes with completely new query monetization potentials for our browsers, both from conversation with the native Opera AI assistant and as it relates to the back-end understanding of a user's intentions, presenting relevant products and services natively in the user interface. The browser is unlike any other app. It's a gateway to almost every service available online. And as the browser gets smarter, the user can more efficiently act on their intentions. For example, if the user starts formulating a query in a URL bar, the browser can understand the intention and expand the interface to present relevant destinations. Or if a user was interrupted during a session, the browser can organize that history and enable a seamless continuation later on. In fact, AI unlocks both advertising and query revenue opportunities for us. On the advertising side, deep learning and agentic AI are leading to greater optimization and better targeting of user intent, resulting in greater conversion rates for our advertising partners. On the query side, we are witnessing an evolution in search. Historically, search has been limited to the keywords users are searching for, but over the past few years we have seen this transform from simple keywords to more complex and longer question-based queries and more recently to chat conversations. As a browser with control of the URL bar and omnibox, we are well positioned as an entry node to search and AI chats. As these more complex searches and conversations begin to be monetized, we are in an excellent position to benefit. Now, turning to our products and recent innovations, standing on the key topic of AI potentials for the browser. We recently introduced Browser Connector, available both in our subscription-based agentic browser, Opera Neo, and in our mainstream browsers, Opera One and GX. Browser Connector allows users to plug their favorite AI tools directly into their live browser sessions via a protocol known as the MCP, providing the AI platform of their choice with full real-time context of open tabs and active content. Think of this as bring your own AI. The MCP protocol is an open standard that enables a secure connection between a browser host and AI models, giving users the freedom to choose their preferred combination of browser and AI backends. With the browser connector, the user no longer needs to act as the personal secretary of their own online AI tools, copy and pasting links and context. Instead, the browser enables the AI of choice to access and read page content, understand open tabs, and even take screenshots to analyze images or graphs. Beyond the technical upgrades, Browser Connector reinforces or offers long-standing advocacy for user choice over ecosystem lock-in. Product innovation translates to user appreciation and increased usage of our browsers, which again translates to revenue tailwinds. Looking at key Western markets, we see users who engage with AI within our browsers, spend over an hour more per day in the browser, and even perform 50% more traditional searches than comparable users who are not yet engaged in AI, all of which directly contributes to upgrowth. Our broad approach to monetization puts us in a differentiated position as most companies that are monetizing AI today are either chip and compute providers, or those relying exclusively on subscriptions and usage-based models. In terms of our user base, we added 4 million users during the first caller, bringing our total monthly average users to 288 million. We added 400,000 Western users on top of the Seasonally Strong First Caller, and we benefited from both continued Android adoption and PC platform growth, and 1 million new Opera GX users globally. In total, our analyzed output was $2.43, a 25% increase year-over-year. The final topic I would like to discuss is Minipay, our non-custodial stablecoin wallet with deep ecosystem roots. Minipay is the leading stablecoin wallet in Africa, appreciated for its technical ease and seamless integrations with great opportunities and real-life benefits with access to stable coins both within emoji markets and as a global payment framework. Just last week, we announced a $1 million incentive for local developers of mini-apps that take advantage of the transaction opportunities of Minipay. And we are using our underground presence in Africa and largely America to provide in-person support. This supports the continued expansion of mini apps available in Minipay, covering a broad range of services from finance, shopping, entertainment, and utility tools. Minipay has now activated over 15 million wallets and processed over 430 million total transactions. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Frida Jacobson, our CFO, to discuss our financial results, guidance, and capital allocation in greater detail. Frida?

Thanks, Song. As Song Lin mentioned, we are very pleased with the start of 2026 and the trajectory we are on now well into the second quarter. Yet again, we overperformed our estimates and delivered an incremental $4 million of revenue on top of the guidance range with over 50% conversion to incremental adjusted EBITDA. This level of outperformance is particularly impressive in the face of seasonal headwinds following the holiday-heavy fourth quarter. Instead of a seasonal dip, our underlying commercial momentum overpowered those trends and drove sequential advertising revenue higher in the first quarter. Q1 also marks our 20th consecutive quarter as a rule of 40 company, and we are well on track for 2026 to be the sixth consecutive year where we meet that high bar. In fact, our average annual revenue growth, or CAGR, stands at 21% over the past 10-year period, a feat few public companies achieve even more so for companies that have been around for over 30 years like opera in these times filled with innovation and opportunity we continue to benefit from the resilience and agility of our business model disciplined execution and our consistency in pairing rapid and organic growth with healthy profitability our outperformance continues to be broad-based with total revenue growth of 23%, as opposed to the midpoint guidance of 19% growth. Within our total quarterly revenue of $176 million, advertising was $117 million, or 67% of the total, and query revenue was $58 million. Advertising revenue grew at 24%, and the evolution of our search business into a broader query approach resulted in query revenue growth of 23 percent, a level we haven't seen since the post-COVID rebound in 2021 as we better monetize high-intent user actions across the browser interface. In terms of cost, I want to highlight the fact that we scale the business beyond expectations while also improving gross margin by about 60 basis points versus the prior quarter. Cost of revenue items combined represented 36.8% of revenue, down from the 37.4% we saw in Q4, and according to margin expectations from our prior costs commentary. Also as expected, cash-based compensation ticked slightly down from the Q4 level to 21.5 million. Marketing spend came in just below what we had built into guidance at $38.5 million, while the of all other OPEX items, pre-adjusted EBITDA, came in at $9 million, or just above expectations, but still resulting in a slight net benefit. All in all, our continued cost discipline underpinned our adjusted EBITDA overperformance, coming in at $42 million for the quarter, or a 24% margin. Operating cash flow was also $42 million in the quarter, representing a 100% conversion of adjusted EBITDA, a strong net collection more than offset the limited tax payments we incurred. Free cash flow from operations was $35.5 million, or 85% of adjusted EBITDA. We continue to expect fluctuations quarter to quarter due to the size and timing of tax and bonus payments, as well as other working capital movements, though I will reiterate my statement from last quarter that the full year conversion ratio of EBITDA to these cash flow metrics as achieved in 2025 continue to be reasonable expectations, also for 2026. turning to capital allocation and return of cash to our shareholders where we combine a recurring dividend program of 80 cents per year with our recently launched 300 million dollar buyback program the dividend is paid out semi-annually with 40 cents or 36 million dollars paid out in January. In terms of the buyback, we repurchased 1.14 million shares in March for a total spend of 17 million, pro rata distributed between public buybacks and repurchases from our majority shareholder at the same price per share, $14.88. This reduced the total number of shares outstanding as of 31st March to 89.55 million. You'll see 12.8 million of the spend in our Q1 cash flow with the settlement of the remaining 4.1 million taking place in Q2. Now turning to our guidance. In terms of our full year outlook, our solid start to the year allows us to raise revenue guidance to 727 to 740 million, or 18 to 20% growth for the year as a whole. With that, we are raising the low end of guidance by 7 million and the high end by 5 million from the range we provided just two months ago, adding about one percentage point of growth to our expectations. Still, in line with our guidance logic, this range continues to allow for later upside potential in the second half of the year. We let just over 40% of the incremental revenue flow through to our adjusted EBITDA guidance and update our annual range to become 170 to 174 million, or a 23.4% margin at the midpoints. That means that our prior high end of the range has now become the midpoint. For the second quarter, we guide revenue of 176 to 178 million, or 23 to 25% growth. The quarter is already well underway, and both our operational and commercial performance supports the nice step-up versus prior implicit expectations. We guide adjusted EBITDA of 40 to 42 million, representing a 23.2% margin and 28% adjusted EBITDA growth at the midpoints. In terms of costs, we then implicitly guide to a full-year OPEX base, pre-adjusted EBITDA of 562 million at the midpoints, of which 136 million in Q2. We continue to expect cost of revenue items combined to represent about 38% of revenue for the year, with mid-year coming in around the annual average before we go slightly higher in Q4 with its seasonal advertising peak. As discussed before, Opera Ads has a different gross margin profile compared to our O&O revenue streams, resulting in a greater cost of revenue component in our overall results even as our upper ads gross margin is ticking up. Apart from the business mix effect, we continue to see the upper ads gross margin expanding as the platform scales and our optimization algorithms evolve in addition to benefiting from no marketing costs and limited OPEC space. Cash-based compensation expense is expected to grow just above 10% for the year as a whole, which is slightly lower than our earlier expectation of growth in the low teens. We expect costs to increase modestly in Q2 with annual salary adjustments effective as of April. Post-Q2, compensation costs are expected to show smaller movements quarter to quarter. Full-year marketing cost remains expected to grow by about 10% from the 2025 level, with Q2 costs quite similar to Q1, followed by a slightly higher spend level in the later quarters. In sum, cash-based compensation and marketing will then decline from representing 36% of revenue in 2025 to representing about 33% of revenue in 2026. For all other OPEX items pre-adjusted EBITDA, we increase our full year estimate to represent just over 20% growth year over year, up from our earlier expectation at about 15% growth. This is explained by hosting costs and the effects of our rapid business scaling, increased AI usage, and pricing impact of constrained supply, while other items included in the total remain stable overall. We expect the cost category to increase quite linearly as the year progresses. In sum, while we continue to focus on building scale over accelerating margin expansion, as we refresh our estimates, we see a slight further widening of the gap between revenue and cost growth, allowing us to lift our adjusted EBITDA margin by about 15 basis points at the midpoints of full-year guidance two months after providing the first caller on 2026. In light of our performance and outlook, we remain very pleased with having expanded shareholder returns beyond our recurring dividend program to also include our new buyback program. We repurchased 1.3% of shares outstanding in the program's first month at an attractive $14.88 per share, Accelerating ROI Upside for Our Shareholders While it's only been a couple of months since our last release we've been excited to share today's updates with you and look forward to keeping you posted on our progress With that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for your questions

Thank you As a reminder to ask a question please press star 1 on your telephone keypad To withdraw your question, press star 2. When posing your question, we ask that you please pick up your handset for optimal sound quality. And we'll take our first question from Eric Sheridan with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Thanks so much for taking the question. I wanted to know if we could go a little bit deeper into the learnings you have to date with respect to the adoption of AI tools across your user base. And when you look longer term, what do you see as the opportunity set either at the browser level or maybe even for the rise of agentic commerce behavior by users that could bode well for both user growth as well as monetization opportunities? Thanks so much.

Sure. So it's only here I'll try to answer. So, yeah, so high level, I guess, number one, I would almost say that I think more like we're always an advocate for AI, and that's also why we almost try to embed it. in many of the aspects within the browser anyway, as we also talk about in the scripts that we also have it, for instance, from the URL bar, omnibar, to of course also the Opera AI assistant that the user can engage from sidebar, and then further on to allow users to use AI with their own subscription, bring your own AI. So that's consistent with all offerings, and I would almost say that number one, in general, we see that once we're provided in the right context, in the right moment, you know, are very happy about it. So that's why I think we also talk about it briefly in the script that whoever uses AI, we saw that they almost spend one hour more in, say, desktop browsers, which is already a very long hour spent compared with any other thing. And then they also typically, you know, search almost one time more, right, than the others, search or engage with AI in different ways. So I think in general we are very positive about it because those basically transfer to better opportunity to capture user intents and also the monetization opportunities as follow-on. So I think that's, in general, where we see that why it's beneficial. And on the other end, though, I think maybe the only thing we'll just say that we should, of course, never forget that in the end of the day, user is the first, right? So, you know, as Opera, for instance, we never tried to push user 2020 may not be what they want. So I think the number one priority should always be that you give what you want. And also it's also equally important to be aware that, of course, it's not all about efficiency, for instance, because for many of the times, it's either just want to kill time, they just want to enjoy what they do, and we should also respect that. So I think that's what also we see, that people in the longer term, whoever wins will be, who respect user behavior, give them the AI and the right context and right time, helping them use their own stuff instead of giving something with the lock-in ecosystem, whatever that is. And I think that's what we see at least a major growth of us, both for the use of all those AI features, but also for how we actually see quite a good growth of user base. As you can see that even though Q1 is actually traditionally almost a bit lower season, It's actually, you know, we have been done very well on the user base-wise. And we actually almost see one of the highest growths of MAUs on desktop, for instance, likely as a result. So that's, yeah, more like that's some high-level feeders.

We'll move next to Navid Han with Be Reilly Securities. Your line is open.

Thank you very much. So two questions from me. One is, you know, this metric you shared about users who engage with AI spend an hour more per day, and you see a 50% increase in searches. I'm curious what percentage of your base is engaging with the AI chat features that you currently have, and what are the levers that you control to drive this higher? And the second question I have is just on the Google renewal that's coming up at the end of the year. How are those conversations going? Are you confident about renewing it or just giving us a thought there?

So, yeah, it's only how I think I also tried to answer it. I captured the last question first because I think I just revolved on that. So, yeah, I think for Google, I think we also talked about, I believe, two months ago, you know, Q4 release, that we are very happy to be one of the first to sign with Google the renewed, let's say, agreement for the year due to the DOJ requirement, right, with them in the U.S., so very happy. We are very happy. I think they are also very happy that we are one of the first partners to do that. And moving forward, we don't expect any surprises. We have very good dialogue with them. Hopefully there will be also some interesting openness of new potentials that we can cooperate with Google, both on the search but potentially on the AI side and a few other sites. And yeah, for the renewal, I think we typically have a standard process of renewing with them by the second half of the year. I think we'll continue the right path on that trend and we'll provide an update when search is available. But for now, I think cooperation is fantastic, and as you also see that we even have one of the highest growths of traditional search queries ever. So I think both sides are very happy, and hopefully we can expand that partnership moving forward. Yeah, and then I guess also super quickly comment a bit on your questions on AI, right? So yeah, I guess in short, for now we have not disclosed the exact AI usage percent. I think the reason just because now there's so many touch points and entry points of AI that it's almost a bit hard for us to define a particular entry. Well, you know, what kind does the user use AI or not, you know, because that can happen both from Omnibar, whenever there is a suggestion, which is of course we are always updating, so that's also why you see a good growth of query revenues. Most of them are actually resulted of the many of the AI that we are trying to recommend, but of course it's also possible for users to both access AI from the sidebar with Opera AI, but with the latest introduced of a browser with your own AI, you can actually control the browser by browser connector from your chat GPT subscription inside the browser directly, or from your cloud and other chatbots directly from a web page. So I guess it will become a hurdle for us to define particularly what content AI usage, because I think that will be almost prolific, that almost the majority, I think we do expect the majority of the interactions within the browser will encounter AI in one form or another. And I think our goal is basically just to make sure that we are the browser of choice, we are the standalone player, we give them all the options available, and hopefully, you know, for instance, if you have a clouded subscription, our goal is just to make sure that Opera is the best go-to place for you to use. And saying that if you have ChatGPT, you know, subscription, but you also want to use Gemini sometimes, we should also be the go-to choice. So I think that's our aim, and I think we're actually moving further to that goal. Thank you. We'll move next to Ron

Josie with Citi. Your line is open. Great. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to ask a little bit more on search, specifically with query growth accelerating in the quarter. And Fodor, I think you talked about as search evolves into a broader query approach overall. So talk to us about the evolution as search as we see accelerating query growth and specifically, you know, the tie between call it the new browser AI tools and engagement as search revenues growth and query grow, in fact, accelerate. So any insights on the evolution here would be super, super helpful. And And then bigger picture, understood with guidance here, but any insights on the broader advertising environment would be very helpful. Are there any verticals to call out one way or the other?

Hi, Ron. Frodo here, I'll start. So I think in the first quarter we saw the year-over-year search, like pure search revenue was growing at about 14% year-over-year, which was very strong. and up from the growth that we saw in all the quarters in 2025. And then on top of that, we have the broadening of the category, including also the non-search query revenues that drove it up to 23% total overall. So I think we look at that category in an enthusiastic way because as these new tools evolve and as people can engage with the browser in new ways, We have more opportunities to direct the people to the things they are looking for in native ways in the browser.

And further to that, as engagement wraps, Ramsey talked about more opportunity to direct. And then we heard in the call earlier, I think, Song, you talked about broader engagement for those who have adopted AI tools. And I know we've talked about that on this Q&A section. But any insights on adoption of AI tools to the browser and the user base overall?

Yeah, so, yeah, it's only here, right? So I guess I'll just compliment a bit on what Buda is saying that, I mean, as I said, I think now the way we see it, it's becoming really proliferating that, you know, like, for instance, if you just use Opera Browser, you can go to ChatGPT by just using the Browser Connector, you can basically from there to control the Opera Browser. And the same way that, let's say if you type a regular URL, we will actually use AI to say that, oh, maybe this is Amazon tools, a product that you would like. Right, you will pop up, you will click on it, they will go to it, and same as the booking.com is also a perfect example that now it actually works that way. So I would almost say that I think now we're basically coming to a stage where you could arguably say that the majority of the browser, of the user sessions probably have AI involved in one form or the other and I think we'll see that there will be the future moving forward and I think the key is just as we also maybe mentioned a bit earlier that I think the key is just maybe find the right you know design and combination that it should it's you know it should really facilitate you those browsing behaviors I think maybe that's something which people have forgotten that at the end of the day, it's always, you know, consumer force is always end user force. It's very important that it's something facilitating. For instance, that's also why we provide this browser connector, instead of pushing them to force them to use some particular operator tool, but actually they can use whatever existing air tool they like. And I think that's a very important philosophy that we believe in. And we actually feel strongly that that should be the direction of what a browser should do, right? As an independent player, the user can choose whatever AI they like. It can be from existing big players. It can be even from open source if they choose. And then we just have to make sure that we provide this browser connector in MCP protocol that people can access. That is great. And then they can do whatever to control it. And I think we are basically in the best position to provide it. So maybe perhaps that's also why I would almost say that so far for the browser come up by the particular AI providers, I don't think there's too much acceptance of it, but rather we actually see very nice growth. Actually we have the higher growth of our users, say for desktop, that we have not seen for years. So I think we are very encouraged by that.

Great. Thank you very much.

We'll take our next question from I'm Jim Callahan with Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

All right, thanks for taking the question. I'm interested in the comments on travel, rolling out this sort of performance-based product there. Would you just be curious how much of these pieces are in place to kind of roll that out, or is that something that's kind of already in the model today?

So I'll go in terms of the model. So our guidance is always quite bottom-up estimate where we look at what we have today. And then we rather leave upside for things to scale better than what we build into guidance in the later parts of the year. And, of course, travel is a big opportunity. We can use our lessons from the e-commerce opportunity to scale into this vertical. It's also interesting seasonality-wise that it has a different annual profile with sort of mid-year travels, etc., whereas e-commerce and shopping tends to be or is definitely strongest around year-end and the holiday season.

Okay, got it. That is helpful. And then anything in terms of guidance for, I don't know, either 2Q or a full year, just relative growth between query and advertising?

I will be a bit careful to break it down into detail because it evolves as we evolve the opportunity, especially the non-search parts of query is relatively new, and then search as a whole is also quite market-based on top of how we move our user base. And then on the advertising side, of course, we have a baseline and we have a guidance, and we also have opportunities that you just touched on. So for now, I would say Q1 was very strong on the query overall. I think we don't need to continue a year-over-year growth of over 20% on a query basis to meet our guidance, but it's a bit too soon to discuss specifics for the later parts of the year. Great. Thank you.

And as a reminder, task question, that is star 1 on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, press star 2. We'll move next to Jacob Steffen with Lake Street Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Congrats on a nice quarter. Maybe just to start off for me, I'll ask on the MCP. This kind of positions you as kind of the central call point for several AI tools, but do you think that this kind of risks cannibalizing any of the Opera Neon subscriptions or economics, or is this kind of a complementary funnel? Curious your thoughts here.

Yeah, so, yeah, it's actually a very good question. So, as, like, yeah, it's a very relevant question, right? So I guess, yes, we do have a choice, right? Like any given AI feature, which are quite interesting, we do have a choice of do we only give it to open here and hopefully we will push more for subscription revenue or do we think that it's more relevant for the broader audience and as a result, hopefully, also attract more users in the generic Opera 1 or GX product, right? But I think basically, as also demonstrated by our numbers, I think we are in a bit slightly luxurious situation that we are not burning money like all those base model companies. We are quite profitable and we have good revenue and also, you know, because our revenue model is because of advertisement, right, that where we do not really have to rely on fixed subscription revenue, and then be aware that typically that subscription revenue is also, if you are a traditional AI company, that subscription revenue also has coupled heavily with a burning token cost, which is almost many times not sustainable. So I would almost say that, you know, for in this particular case you ask, it's a bit easy, simple decision, because we see We saw that there's a great user feedback, people liked it, and then we calculated that it's economically much better to put it outside, really just because, remember, this is bringing your own AI, right? So we don't even need to use our own tokens. These are tokens from JGBT or whatever, based on what you already have. And so we don't really have any cost, really, whatsoever. But that, you know, if that causes a higher retention, how to use a search, how to use a user browser, because at the end of the day you don't have to use it inside the browser anyway that we would be able to capture all the intent and monetize if needed anyway. So this particular case is actually a very easy decision that it makes more sense to have it available on the general product and make money by regular browsers which are already demonstrated to be very profitable anyway. I'm sure that there will be certain features may be tailored to particular, you know, vertical audiences, that would only be available in NEO, like many of the current NEO features is, and those will be more subscription-based. But yeah, for the Browser Connector, it's an obvious choice that it's better to make it wisely available.

Okay, very helpful. Maybe just last one for me on Minipay. Obviously, nice momentum there. At what point does this kind of become more of a P&L contributor versus, you know, just the strategic investment? Do you kind of, I guess, looking longer term, you know, what are your plans for Minipay

Yeah, I can comment a bit on Minipay. So Minipay is already meaningfully contributing. We generate about $20 million of revenue from the broader ecosystem around it. it is a very successful product as you say and it does allow people we we've tailored it initially for emerging markets to have an easy way to access stable coins and and other other blockchain types of assets and we we continue to think it has a huge potential ahead and and can really scale Still, this is one of those items that is quite early, still a bit early in terms of how big it can get and what the trajectory looks until that point. But on Opay, which is a separate topic, that's a company that Opera founded back in 2017, and we have a 9.5% stake in that, that we carry on our balance sheet at about $300 million of book value. That company is by now operating completely independently from Opera and is advancing on its own. So while we're not operationally working together, we of course share a history and we're very proud to see how that company has scaled and is sort of working towards what we expect will ultimately be an IPO, which we think is also very positive for Opera because it would sort of immediately make visible the market value of that company and offer a stake in it. Got it. Makes sense. I appreciate all the color. Thanks, guys.

We'll take our next question from Jonathan Navarrete with TD Cowan. Your line is open.

Thanks. How are buybacks going in two keys so far, and how should we think about the pacing through the year?

Hey, so I don't think we'll get into sort of talking ahead beyond sort of the historical period. But overall, we're, of course, very pleased to have that program in place. I guess it's the third or fourth time that we launched a buyback program and the by far biggest one that we have launched. I think we already are, you know, we reported our March trades, essentially, since the program became, was launched in late Feb and we could start trading in March. And already, I think it can contribute to accelerating ROI for our shareholders as we take shares out of the denominator. And then sort of going ahead, I think we continue to be, as we've always been with buybacks, opportunistic and adjust the program to maximize the value that we can create. I think just the fact that we are in that position, we talked about it a bit on the last quarter as well. We are growing fast and we are self-funded in the sense that, you know, the business is generating very healthy cash flows. And our CapEx model, as Song touched on, on the AI side is very limited compared to other companies that you would think about in that space. So we don't have like a massive investment need to drive our business. It's a software layer. It's a service. And that is what we are good at. So we don't want to compete in the hardware race. And that also means that the cash we generate, we can actually return it to shareholders. We like the recurring dividend. And the buyback just helps us drive incremental upside.

Great. And just one more question. There were some reports this morning that OpenAI missed some internal self-targets. And just wondering, what could be the read-through, if any, for you guys?

OpenAI? I think, okay, it's actually convenient that you ask the question immediately after my prior response. because I think that we are quite distinguished. If you think about companies that have an, let's say, AI opportunity, then, of course, we have the major platforms like OpenAI, et cetera. But you also have Opera, right? But we do it as a service in a browser. We don't try to compete against the big LLMs out there, whether it's ChatGPT or Gemini or Quad. or any of the other ones but we are very good at providing an interface for llms to exist very close to the user to control the browser to take into account context of the user and to enable it to be as productive as possible right that so for example as we talked about with the browser connector our own open opera ai in the browser like you as a human you don't have to sit and be like the personal secretary of an AI model and copy paste links and text right you you can just you can you can operate the these tools in the browser with the context included so I think comparing us to open AI in some ways flattering that you ask but at the same time I I think our cost and capital need structure is completely different.

Maybe I'll just add that I think in general, I think hopefully as we also demonstrated, that both Opera and the potential our users are already demonstrated to be very AI-savvy, I would say. Otherwise, unlike some other maybe old-fashioned browser companies, People who ever use AI, whoever use Opera tends to be AI savvy, tends to be very interested. So I would almost say that I think, of course, 300 million MEU of that is a very attractive partner that whoever, you know, want to grow AI is, I think we must be a very attractive partner that they can work with. You know, for instance, if you compare with many other equally similarly big players, like even Claudia or X or whatever, I think, I believe their MAU are in a range of almost one-tenth of our MAUs, right? I'm sure Open Air has a bit more, but at least our 300 million, there must be a very interesting partnership opportunities. So I guess that will also be our, you know, hopefully with the year moving on, we can see what can be done there.

And it does appear that there are no further questions at this time. I would now like to hand the call back to Song Lin for any additional or closing remarks.

Sure. So, yeah, I guess thank you to everyone for joining us today. 2026 is, again, to a great start. Our continued moment in a truly exciting landscape has already resulted in a solid foundation for continued strength through the remainder of the year and well beyond. Have a good day, everyone.

Thank you. This brings us to the end of today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation. You may now disconnect.